natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the start of the transitional period, the situation as regards translation from and into Maltese has improved considerably, so that an extension of the temporary derogation measures is not justified.
Splošne možnosti za prevajanje iz malteščine in v malteščino so se od začetka prehodnega obdobja znatno izboljšale, in sicer tako, da za podaljšanje ukrepov v zvezi z začasnim odstopanjem ni zadostnega razloga.
By Decision of 24 October 2006, the Council accordingly decided that there were no grounds for such an extension.
Svet je s sklepom z dne 24. oktobra 2006 odločil, da za tako podaljšanje ni več podlage.
The transitional period will therefore come to an end on 30 April 2007.
Zaradi tega se bo prehodno obdobje končalo 30. aprila 2007.
However, Article 3 of the said Regulation stipulates that, at the end of the transitional period, all acts which at that time have not already been published in the Maltese language are also to be published in that language; it would nevertheless appear to be very difficult for all those acts to be translated and published immediately after 30 April 2007.
Vendar pa člen 3 omenjene uredbe določa, da se ob koncu prehodnega obdobja vsi akti, ki do tedaj še ne bodo objavljeni v malteškem jeziku, objavijo tudi v tem jeziku. Ne zdi se pa zelo verjetno, da bodo vsi zadevni akti prevedeni in objavljeni takoj po 30. aprilu 2007.
Article 3 should therefore be amended in order to give the institutions a further space of time to enable them to absorb the backlog of all the acts that will not have been published in Maltese by the end of the transitional period,
Zato je treba spremeniti omenjeni člen 3, da bi institucije razpolagale z dodatnim rokom, ki bi jim omogočil objavo vseh aktov, ki ob koncu prehodnega obdobja še ne bodo objavljeni v malteškem jeziku –
Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 930/2004 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 930/2004 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
All acts which have not been published in Maltese by 30 April 2007 will also be published in that language by 31 December 2008 at the latest.’
Vsi akti, ki do 30. aprila 2007 še ne bodo objavljeni v malteškem jeziku, se objavijo tudi v tem jeziku najpozneje do 31. decembra 2008.“
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 920/2005 (OJ L 156, 18.6.2005, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 920/2005 (UL L 156, 18.6.2005, str. 3).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 920/2005.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 920/2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1739/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1739/2006
terminating the partial interim review of anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of silicon originating in the Russian Federation
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ruske federacije
Previous investigations and measures in force
Prejšnje preiskave in veljavni ukrepi
By Council Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 [2], a definitive anti-dumping duty was imposed on imports of silicon originating in Russia.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2229/2003 [2] je bila uvedena protidampinška dajatev na uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Rusije.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to imports from SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia and its related company ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia is 22,7 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za uvoz družbe SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Uralska regija, Rusija, in njene povezane družbe ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, regija Irkutsk, Rusija, je 22,7 %.
The Commission, by Decision 2004/445/EC [3] accepted an undertaking offered by those companies.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2004/445/ES [3] sprejela zavezo, ki so jo ponudile te družbe.
On 6 February 2006, the Commission received a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of silicon originating in the Russian Federation.
Komisija je 6. februarja 2006 prejela zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe v zvezi s protidampinškimi ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ruske federacije.
The request was made by SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia and its related company ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia (the applicant) and was limited in scope to the determination of dumping as far as the applicant is concerned.
Zahtevek sta vložili družbi SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Uralska regija, Rusija, in njena povezana družba ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Regija Irkutsk, Rusija, („vložnik“) in je bil omejen na določitev dampinga v zvezi s tem vložnikom.
The request contained prima facie evidence that the circumstances on the basis of which measures were established have changed and that these changes are of a lasting nature.
Zahtevek je vseboval zadostne prima facie dokaze, ki pričajo, da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile, in da so spremembe trajne narave.
The Commission, by a notice (notice of initiation) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4], accordingly initiated a partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of silicon, currently classifiable within CN code 28046900 and originating in the Russian Federation.
Komisija je z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4], začela delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicija, trenutno uvrščenega pod oznako KN 28046900 in s poreklom iz Ruske federacije.
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the representatives of the exporting country and the association of Community producers of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je vložnika, predstavnike države izvoznice in združenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation and questionnaires were sent to the applicant.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku, vsi vložniki pa so prejeli vprašalnike.
The investigation period was 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006.
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. marca 2006.
WITHDRAWAL OF THE REQUEST AND TERMINATION OF THE INTERIM REVIEW
UMIK ZAHTEVKA IN ZAKLJUČEK VMESNEGA PREGLEDA
On 29 May 2006, i.e. before the submission of a reply to the questionnaire, the applicant formally withdrew their request.
Vložnik je 29. maja 2006, tj. pred predložitvijo izpolnjenega vprašalnika, uradno umaknil svoj zahtevek.
It was considered whether it would be warranted to continue the investigation ex officio despite the above mentioned withdrawal.
Proučeno je bilo, ali je kljub zgoraj navedenemu umiku zahtevka utemeljeno nadaljevati preiskavo po uradni dolžnosti.
However, given that the request had been withdrawn at an early stage of the investigation, no evidence relating to the current IP was available and no preliminary findings were obtained at this stage which would have allowed continuing with the investigation.
Ker je bil zahtevek umaknjen v zgodnji fazi preiskave, ni bilo na voljo nobenega dokaza v zvezi s sedanjim OP, v tej fazi pa tudi še ni bilo uvodnih ugotovitev, na podlagi katerih bi se lahko preiskava nadaljevala.
Information provided for in the applicant's request had not brought to light any considerations showing that the termination of the review would not be in the Community interest.
Informacije iz vložnikovega zahtevka niso razkrile nobenih premislekov, zaradi katerih zaključek sedanjega pregleda ne bi bil v interesu Skupnosti.
All interested parties were informed about the intention to terminate the present proceeding.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o nameri, da se zaključi sedanji postopek.
One interested party argued that the applicant was still exporting the product concerned to the EC at dumped prices and that therefore the investigation should continue.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da je vložnik še vedno izvažal zadevni izdelek v ES po dampinških cenah in da bi bilo treba zato preiskavo nadaljevati.
However, it should be noted that the termination of this investigation does not result in the elimination of the anti-dumping measure which is already in force in order to re-establish fair trade practises.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da posledica zaključka tega postopka ni odprava že veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov, potrebnih za vzpostavitev pravične trgovine.
Therefore, this argument had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba to utemeljitev zavrniti.
Two other interested parties argued also in favour of continuing the present investigation in order to remove the measures, given the alleged shortage of supply in the EC.
Dve drugi zainteresirani stranki sta prav tako zahtevali nadaljevanje sedanje preiskave za odpravo ukrepov, saj naj bi domnevno obstajalo pomanjkanje ponudbe v ES.
However, this argument is outside the scope of this investigation which is limited to the reassessment of the dumping margin of one exporter.
Vendar ta utemeljitev ne spada v obseg preiskave, ki je omejena na ponovno oceno stopnje dampinga za enega izvoznika.
Therefore, the continuation of this investigation would in any event not change the level of measures to which other exporters are subject to.
Zato nadaljevanje te preiskave v nobenem primeru ne bi spremenilo stopnje ukrepov, ki veljajo za druge izvoznike.
It could not, consequently, address the issue of short supply in a non-discriminatory way.
Vendar pa ni bilo mogoče obravnavati vprašanja pomanjkanja ponudbe na nediskriminatoren način.
It was therefore concluded that the current interim review of definitive anti-dumping measures applicable to imports into the Community of silicon originating in the Russian Federation should be terminated.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je treba sedanji vmesni pregled dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ruske federacije v Skupnost, zaključiti.
The anti-dumping measures with regard to the applicant currently in force should be maintained without affecting the duration of the measures,
Trenutno veljavne protidampinške ukrepe v zvezi z vložnikom je treba ohraniti, ne da bi to vplivalo na trajanje ukrepov –
The partial interim review, pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, with regard to the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of silicon originating in the Russian Federation by virtue of Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003, is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 v zvezi s protidampinškimi ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicija s poreklom iz Ruske federacije, uvedenimi z Uredbo (ES) št. 2229/2003, se zaključi.
The anti-dumping measures currently in force with regard to SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Ural Region, Russia and ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Irkutsk Region, Russia are maintained.
Trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi v zvezi z družbama SKU LLC, Sual-Kremny-Ural, Kamensk, Uralska regija, Rusija, in ZAO KREMNY, Irkutsk, Regija Irkutsk, Rusija, se ohranijo.
OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 3.
UL L 339, 24.12.2003, str. 3.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 821/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 821/2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 1).
OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 114.
UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 114.
OJ C 82, 5.4.2006, p. 64.
UL C 82, 5.4.2006, str. 64.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1740/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1740/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 25 November 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 25. novembra 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 24 November 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 24. novembra 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1741/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1741/2006
laying down the conditions for granting the special export refund on boned meat of adult male bovine animals placed under the customs warehousing procedure prior to export
o pogojih za dodelitev posebnega izvoznega nadomestila za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola, dano v postopek carinskega skladiščenja pred izvozom
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1964/82 of 20 July 1982 laying down the conditions for granting special export refunds on certain cuts of boned meat of bovine animals [2] lays down the conditions under which a special refund may be granted on boned cuts of meat of adult male bovine animals exported to third countries.
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 1964/82 z dne 20. julija 1982 o določitvi pogojev za dodelitev posebnih izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kose odkoščenega govejega mesa [2] je podrobno navedla pogoje, pod katerimi se lahko posebno nadomestilo dodeli za kose odkoščenega mesa odraslega goveda moškega spola, ki se izvozijo v tretje države.
For the smooth operation of the arrangements instituted by Regulation (EEC) No 1964/82, the legislator provided in particular for the possibility for operators to make use, in the case of boned meat of adult male bovine animals, of the customs warehousing or free zone procedure provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 565/80 of 4 March 1980 on the advance payment of export refunds in respect of agricultural products [3].
Da bi zagotovili gladek potek postopka, uvedenega z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1964/82, je zakonodajalec zlasti predvidel možnost, da za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola izvajalci uporabijo postopek carinskega skladiščenja ali proste cone, predviden v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 565/80 z dne 4. marca 1980 o predplačilu izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [3].
The rules and general conditions for applying the advance payment of the refund on products placed under the customs warehousing or free zone procedure are laid down in Chapter 3 of Title II of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products [4].
Podrobna pravila in splošni pogoji za izvajanje predplačila nadomestila za proizvode, dane v postopek carinskega skladiščenja ali proste cone, so bili podrobno opredeljeni v poglavju 3 naslova II Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 800/1999 z dne 15. aprila 1999 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [4].
The specific conditions for applying the advance payment on boned meat of adult male bovine animals placed under the customs warehousing or free zone procedure are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 456/2003 of 12 March 2003 laying down special rules on the pre-financing of export refunds for certain beef and veal products placed under a customswarehousing or freezone procedure [5].
Posebni pogoji za izvajanje predplačila nadomestila za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola, dano v postopek carinskega skladiščenja ali proste cone, so bili določeni z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 456/2003 z dne 12. marca 2003 o posebnih pravilih za predfinanciranje izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere proizvode iz govejega in telečjega mesa, dane v postopek carinskega skladiščenja ali proste cone [5].
They were adopted to amplify and clarify the provisions of Regulations (EEC) No 565/80 and (EC) No 800/1999, particularly in terms of controls, for boned meat of adult male bovine animals.
Sprejeti so bili, zato da bi dopolnili in podrobno opredelili določbe uredb (EGS) št. 565/80 in (ES) št. 800/1999, zlasti kar zadeva preglede, za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola.
The measures introduced by Regulation (EEC) No 565/80 and the corresponding implementing measures laid down in Chapter 3 of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 were repealed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1713/2006.
Ukrepi, ki jih določa Uredba (EGS) št. 565/80, in ustrezni ukrepi za uporabo, določeni v poglavju 3 naslova II Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999, so bili razveljavljeni z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1713/2006.
As a result of the repeal of these measures, the specific measures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 456/2003 were rendered obsolete and were also repealed.
Zaradi razveljavitve navedenih ukrepov so posebni ukrepi, določeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 456/2003, zastarali in so bili prav tako razveljavljeni z isto uredbo.
Advance payment of the refund on boned meat of adult male bovine animals under the customs warehousing procedure has been and is still used for exports to third countries.
Predplačilo nadomestila za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola, dano v postopek carinskega skladiščenja, se je uporabljalo in se še vedno uporablja za izvoz v tretje države.
The interest in this system shown by operators is due in particular to the flexibility which it offers for the preparation of orders, especially the possibility for operators to store the meat for a maximum period of four months prior to export and freeze it during that period of intermediate storage.
Zanimanje, ki so ga izvajalci pokazali za tako ureditev, je povezano predvsem s prožnostjo, ki jo omogoča pri pripravi naročil, zlasti ker imajo izvajalci možnost, da dajo navedeno meso za največ štiri mesece pred izvozom v skladišče in ga med tem obdobjem skladiščenja zamrznejo.
In the absence of new provisions, operators will lose the flexibility provided by the previous procedure and will encounter additional difficulties on external markets in exporting boned meat of adult male bovine animals.
Ker ni novih določb, bodo izvajalci izgubili prožnost, ki jo omogoča predhodna ureditev, in bodo imeli pri izvozu odkoščenega mesa odraslega goveda moškega spola dodatne težave na zunanjih trgih.
The consequences of the repeal of those measures should be restricted as far as possible.
Treba je čim bolj omejiti posledice razveljavitve navedenih ukrepov.
To achieve that, operators should be able to continue to place boned meat of adult male bovine animals under the customs warehousing procedure prior to export, and the conditions for granting the special refund on such meat when exported after storage should be laid down.
Zato je nujno predvideti možnost, da lahko izvajalci tudi v prihodnje odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola dajo v postopek carinskega skladiščenja pred izvozom, in za tako meso določiti podrobne pogoje za dodelitev posebnega izvoznega nadomestila po skladiščenju.
Within that framework, it is essential to specify the conditions for meat entering that regime and, in order to ensure the traceability of the meat of adult male bovine animals during storage, provision should be made for operators to set up and update a computerised database approved by the customs authority beforehand.
V okviru tega je bistveno, da se določijo podrobni pogoji za vključitev mesa v tak postopek in da se za zagotovitev sledljivosti mesa odraslega goveda moškega spola med skladiščenjem predvidi, da morajo izvajalci vzpostaviti in voditi računalniško zbirko podatkov, ki jo predhodno potrdi carinski organ.
To improve the transparency of operations and increase the speed and effectiveness of controls, the number of declarations of entry into storage that may be submitted per boning operation and the number of boned meat certificates involved in entry into the supervised storage arrangements should be restricted.
Da bi izboljšali preglednost postopkov ter povečali hitrost in učinkovitost pregledov, je treba omejiti število deklaracij za uskladiščenje, ki se lahko predložijo na podlagi postopkov odkoščevanja, in število izdanih potrdil za odkoščeno meso, na katere se nanaša postopek skladiščenja pod nadzorom.
For the smooth operation of the regime, provision should be made for derogations from Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products [6], in particular as regards the moment when the licences are to be presented and attributed and management of the associated security.
Za pravilno delovanje sistema je treba predvideti odstopanja od določb Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1291/2000 z dne 9. junija 2000 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode [6], zlasti kar zadeva čas predložitve in odobritve dovoljenj ter upravljanje ustrezne varščine.
A maximum storage period should also be laid down and the operations that may be carried out during that period specified.
Določiti je treba tudi najdaljše obdobje skladiščenja in podrobno določiti ravnanje, ki je mogoče v navedenem obdobju.
The criteria for controls during the storage period should also be laid down, and their frequency and the consequences to be drawn in the event of discrepancies between the data recorded in the database and actual stocks specified.
Določiti je treba tudi merila pregleda med obdobjem skladiščenja, njegovo pogostnost in posledice, ki izhajajo iz morebitnega neskladja med podatki, zabeleženimi v zbirki podatkov, in fizično zalogo.
Without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 1964/82, payment of the special export refund on boned meat of adult male bovine animals placed under the customs warehousing procedure prior to their exportation shall be subject to the conditions laid down in this Regulation.
Ne glede na določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 in Uredbe (EGS) št. 1964/82 za izplačilo posebnega izvoznega nadomestila za odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola, ki je pred izvozom dano v postopek carinskega skladiščenja, veljajo pogoji iz te uredbe.
‘boned meat of adult male bovine animals’ means products falling within codes 0201 30 00 9100 and 0201 30 00 9120 of the agricultural product nomenclature for export refunds established by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 [7];
„odkoščeno meso odraslega goveda moškega spola“ pomeni proizvode z oznakama 0201 30 00 9100 in 0201 30 00 9120 nomenklature kmetijskih proizvodov za izvozna nadomestila, določene z Uredbo Komisije (EGS) št. 3846/87 [7];
‘customs warehousing procedure’ means the procedure as defined in Article 98(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 [8];
„postopek carinskega skladiščenja“ pomeni postopek, opredeljen v členu 98(2) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 [8];
‘operator’ means the exporter as defined in Article 2(1)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999;
„izvajalec“ pomeni izvoznika, opredeljenega v členu 2(1)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999;
‘boning operation’ means the meat boned on a single day or part of a day;
„odkoščevanje“ pomeni proizvodnjo odkoščenega mesa v enem dnevu ali delu dneva;
‘boned meat certificate’ means the certificate referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1964/82.
„potrdilo za odkoščeno meso“ pomeni potrdilo iz člena 4(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1964/82.
Admission to the customs warehousing procedure
Sprejetje v postopek carinskega skladiščenja
Admission of boned meat of adult male bovine animals to the customs warehousing procedure shall be conditional on the issue of written authorisation by the customs authority responsible for the management and control of the scheme.
1 Sprejetje odkoščenega mesa odraslega goveda moškega spola v postopek carinskega skladiščenja je pogojeno z izdajo pisnega dovoljenja carinskega organa, odgovornega za upravljanje in nadzor navedenega postopka.