natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As concerns the financial contributions directly transferred by KBM to the machinery rings, the same considerations set out in recitals 85 and 86 apply mutatis mutandis.
V zvezi s finančnimi prispevki, ki jih je KBM neposredno namenil kmetijskim strojnim zadrugam, se smiselno uporabljajo navedbe iz uvodnih izjav (85) in (86).
It cannot be ruled out that a component of aid was retained by the machinery rings, and possibly passed on to their subsidiaries, as a result of an insufficient separation of their respective activities.
Ni mogoče izključiti, da so del pomoči zaradi neustrezne razmejitve med kmetijskimi strojnimi zadrugami in njihovimi hčerinskimi družbami zadržale kmetijske strojne zadruge in ga morda prenesle na hčerinske družbe.
On the other hand, the German authorities have provided figures showing that a large proportion of this aid was indeed passed on to farmers.
Po drugi strani je Nemčija predložila številke, ki kažejo, da je bil velik del pomoči dejansko prenesen na kmete.
The Commission is of the opinion that it can be assumed that payments made by Bavaria through KBM to the machinery rings were passed on to farmers to the extent that they correspond to the average costs of the service as demonstrated by the German authorities.
Komisija meni, da iz tega lahko sledi, da so bila plačila, ki jih je Bavarska preko KBM namenila kmetijskim strojnim zadrugam, prenesena na kmete, pod pogojem, da ustrezajo povprečnim stroškom storitev, ki jih je predložila Nemčija.
Therefore, any sums exceeding the amount demonstrably passed on to farmers on the basis of a calculation of the average costs of the relevant service, and exceeding the ceiling of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over any period of three years laid down in Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 constitute operating aid incompatible with the common market.
Iz tega sledi, da se plačila, ki so bila posledično prenesena na kmete na podlagi izračuna povprečnih stroškov zadevne storitve in presegajo zgornjo mejo 100000 EUR na upravičenca v obdobju treh let iz Uredbe (ES) št. 69/2001, uvrščajo med pomoči za tekoče poslovanje, ki niso združljive s skupnim trgom.
Selection of KBM
Izbor KBM
The Bavarian Agricultural Promotion Act provides that only one such organisation can be approved and supported in Bavaria.
Zakon o spodbujanju bavarskega kmetijstva predvideva, da se lahko odobri in spodbuja le ena taka bavarska organizacija.
KBM was already approved in 1972.
KBM je bil odobren že leta 1972.
Germany stated in its comments that the organisation is a self-help organisation of Bavarian farmers which occupies a special position since there are no comparable organisations with which it could be in competition.
Nemčija je v stališčih sporočila, da je to organizacija kmetov za samopomoč, ki ima poseben položaj, ker ni nobene primerljive organizacije, ki bi ji lahko konkurirala.
At first sight, the selection of KBM does not appear to contravene Community rules on the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts.
Izbor KBM na prvi pogled ni v nasprotju z določbami Skupnosti na področju usklajevanja postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil.
However, the Commission reserves the right to carry out a further analysis of the measure from the angle of Community procurement law.
Komisija si pridržuje pravico do nadaljnje analize ukrepa s stališča zakona Skupnosti o javnih naročilih.
The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid measure at issue, in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Nemčija nezakonito izvajala ukrep, ki je predmet zadevne odločbe, in s tem kršila člen 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
For the reasons set out above the Commission considers that:
Zaradi navedenih razlogov Komisija meni:
Aid granted to farmers for the coordination of the provision of machinery and labour does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Pomoč, ki se odobri kmetom v obliki posredovanja strojev in delovne sile, ni državna pomoč v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
Aid granted to KBM, in so far as it has not been passed on to the machinery rings, is incompatible with the common market.
Pomoč KBM ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, če ni bila prenesena na kmetijske strojne zadruge.
Germany must therefore be required, in accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, to recover such incompatible aid in so far as it does not fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 69/2001.
Zato mora Nemčija izterjati pomoči, ki niso združljive s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, če pomoči ne sodijo na področje uporabe Uredbe (EG) št. 69/2001.
Aid granted to the machinery rings and/or their subsidiaries is incompatible with the common market, in so far as it has not been passed on to farmers.
Pomoči kmetijskim strojnim zadrugam in njihovim hčerinskim družbam niso združljive s skupnim trgom, če niso prenesene na kmete.
The amount passed on to farmers will have to be demonstrated by the German authorities.
Nemčija mora dokazati višino pomoči, ki je bila prenesena na kmete.
The calculation should be based on the average cost of services provided by machinery rings without their commercial subsidiaries, since otherwise those costs may incorporate amounts which may have flowed to the subsidiaries.
Izračun mora temeljiti na povprečnih stroških storitev, ki so jih izvajale kmetijske strojne zadruge brez svojih gospodarskih hčerinskih družb, da se prepreči vključitev zneskov, ki so jih morda izkoristile hčerinske družbe, v izračun.
Germany must be required, under Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, to recover such incompatible aid in so far as it does not fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 69/2001,
Zato mora Nemčija izterjati pomoči, ki niso združljive s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, če pomoči ne sodijo na področje uporabe Uredbe (EG) št. 69/2001 –
The financial contributions granted by Germany to Bavarian farmers through the Bavarian machinery rings in the form of subsidised services involving the coordination of provision of machinery and labour do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Finančni prispevki, ki jih je Nemčija dodelila bavarskim kmetom prek bavarskih kmetijskih strojnih zadrug v obliki subvencioniranih storitev za posredovanje strojev in delovne sile, niso državne pomoči v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The State aid which Germany has granted to the Kuratorium bayerischer Maschinen- und Betriebshilferinge e.V., in so far as it has not been passed on to the machinery rings, and in so far as it exceeds the ceiling of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over any period of three years laid down in Regulation (EC) No 69/2001, is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija odobrila kuratoriju bavarskih kmetijskih strojnih zadrug in zadrug za gospodarsko pomoč, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, če finančna sredstva niso bila prenesena na kmetijske strojne zadruge in če presegajo zgornjo mejo 100000 EUR na upravičenca v obdobju treh let iz Uredbe (ES) št. 69/2001.
The State aid which Germany has granted to machinery rings and their subsidiaries, in so far as it has not been passed on to farmers as demonstrated by the German authorities in accordance with Article 4, and in so far as it exceeds the ceiling of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over any period of three years laid down in Regulation (EC) No 69/2001, is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija odobrila kmetijskim strojnim zadrugam in njihovim hčerinskih družbam, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, če finančna sredstva niso bila prenesena na kmete, kot je ugotovila Nemčija v skladu s členom 4, in presegajo zgornjo mejo 100000 EUR na upravičenca v obdobju treh let, določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 69/2001.
For the purposes of establishing the incompatible aid referred to in Articles 2 and 3, the German authorities shall submit a calculation of the average cost of services provided to farmers by machinery rings having no commercial subsidiary.
Za določitev pomoči iz členov 2 in 3, ki ni združljiva s skupnim trgom, Nemčija predloži izračun povprečnih stroškov storitev, ki so jih kmetijske strojne zadruge, ki nimajo hčerinskih družb, izvedle za kmete.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aid unlawfully paid to them referred to in Articles 2 and 3.
Nemčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da od upravičencev izterja pomoči, ki so bile nezakonito odobrene v skladu s členoma 2 in 3.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this Decision.
Izterjava se izvede brez zamude in v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, pod pogojem, da dovoljujejo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvajanje te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the beneficiaries up to the date of its recovery.
Pomoči, ki jih je treba izterjati, vključujejo obresti od dneva, ko so bile na voljo upravičencem, do dneva vračila.
Interest shall be calculated as laid down in Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [20].Article 6
Obresti bodo izračunane, kot je določeno v Poglavju V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [20].Člen 6
OJ C 82, 5.4.2003, p. 12.
UL C 82, 5.4.2003, str. 12.
C(2004) 1629 final.
C(2004) 1629 konč.
For the purposes of this Decision, ‘core tasks’ means those activities which are eligible for aid under German law.
Glavne naloge v smislu te odločbe so dejavnosti, ki v skladu z nemško zakonodajo prejemajo pomoč.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 (OJ L 63, 28.2.2004, p. 22).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 364/2004 (UL L 63, 28.2.2004, str. 22).
As the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance of the European Communities have ruled, operating aid, i.e. aid intended to relieve an undertaking of the expenses which it would itself normally have had to bear in its day-to-day management or its usual activities, in principle distorts competition (judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-459/93 Siemens SA v Commission [1995] ECR II-1675, paragraphs 48 and 77 and the case law cited therein).
Kot sta odločila Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti, načeloma izkrivljajo pogoje konkurence pomoči za poslovanje in tudi pomoči, s katerimi je podjetje razbremenjeno stroškov, ki bi jih navadno moralo plačati v okviru svojega tekočega poslovanja (sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. junija 1995 v zadevi T-459/93, Siemens SA/Komisija, PSES 1995, str. II-1675, odstavka 48 in 77, in tam imenovana sodna praksa).
ECR I-7747.
PSES 2003, str. I-7747.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities has consistently held that, in the context of competition law, the concept of an undertaking covers any entity engaged in an economic activity, regardless of the legal status of the entity or the way in which it is financed (see, inter alia, the judgment in joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and others v Stichting Pensionsfonds Meidische Specialisten [2000] ECR I-6451, paragraph 74).
V skladu s stalno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti pojem podjetja v skladu z zakonom o konkurenci zajema vsako enoto, ki opravlja gospodarsko dejavnost, neodvisno od pravne oblike in načina financiranja (glej med drugim sodbo z dne 12. septembra 2000 v skupnih zadevah C-180/98 do C-184/98, Pavlov in drugi/Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten, PSES 2000, str. I-6451, odstavek 74).
It has also been consistently held that any activity consisting in offering goods and services on a given market is an economic activity (judgements in Case C-118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7 and in Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851, paragraph 36, as well as the previously cited Pavlov judgment, paragraph 75).
V skladu s stalno sodno prakso je gospodarska dejavnost tista dejavnost, ki je sestavljena iz ponujanja blaga ali storitev na danem trgu (sodbe z dne 16. junija 1987 v zadevi 118/85, Komisija/Italija, PSES 1987, str. 2599, odstavek 7, in z dne 18. junija 1998 v zadevi C-35/96, Komisija/Italija, PSES 1998, str. I-3851, odstavek 36, in navedena sodba Pavlov in drugi, odstavek 75).
See footnote 10.
Glej opombo 10.
OJ L 325, 28.10.2004, p. 4.
UL L 325, 28.10.2004, str. 4.
C(2004) 2669 of 14 July 2004 — France — aid to milk producers who suffered losses as a result of the bankruptcy of Parmalat.
Referenčna številka C(2004) 2669, 14. julij 2004 – Francija – pomoči za proizvajalce mleka, ki so s stečajem podjetja Parmalat utrpeli škodo.
See footnote 4.
Glej opombo 10.
of 14 August 2006
z dne 14. avgusta 2006
(notified under document number C(2006) 3622)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3622)
Commission Decision 2005/648/EC of 8 September 2005 concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria [3] was adopted following an outbreak of Newcastle disease in the administrative region of Vratsa.
Po izbruhu atipične kokošje kuge v regiji Vratsa je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2005/648/ES z dne 8. septembra 2005 o zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo v Bolgariji [3].
Bulgaria confirmed an outbreak of Newcastle disease in the administrative district (county) of Kardzhali in Bulgaria.
Bolgarija je potrdila izbruh atipične kokošje kuge v regiji Kardjali v Bolgariji.
Taking account of the current epidemiology situation in Bulgaria in relation to Newcastle disease and the fact that this country has applied certain disease control measures and has sent further information on the disease situation to the Commission, it appears that the situation in Bulgaria, except for the regions of Vratsa, Blagoevgrad, Kardzhali and Burgas (excluding the municipalities of Burgas and Sungurlare) is still satisfactory.
Ob upoštevanju trenutnega epidemiološkega stanja v Bolgariji v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo in dejstva, da je ta država izvajala nekatere ukrepe nadzora bolezni in je Komisiji poslala nadaljnje podatke o stanju bolezni, se zdi, da je stanje v Bolgariji – razen v regijah Vratsa, Blagoevgrad, Kardjali in Burgas (z izjemo občin Burgas in Sungurlare) – še vedno zadovoljivo.
In Decision 2005/648/EC the Annex is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 2005/648/ES se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 14 August 2006.
V Bruslju, 14. avgusta 2006
Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/354/EC (OJ L 132, 19.5.2006, p. 34).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/354/ES (UL L 132, 19.5.2006, str. 34).
Administrative district of Blagoevgrad
Regija Blagoevgrad
Administrative district of Burgas, excluding the municipalities of Burgas and Sungurlare
Regija Burgas, razen občin Burgas in Sungurlare
Adminsitrative district of Kardzhali’
Regija Kardjali“
of 18 August 2006
z dne 18. avgusta 2006
(notified under document number C(2006) 3700)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3700)
Directive 2000/75/EC lays down control rules and measures to combat bluetongue in the Community, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones and a ban on animals leaving those zones.
Direktiva 2000/75/ES določa pravila nadzora in ukrepe za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika v Skupnosti, vključno z določitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij ter prepovedjo premikov živali z navedenih območij.
Spain has informed the Commission that the presence of the vector has been detected in a number of new peripheral areas of the restricted zone.
Španija je obvestila Komisijo, da so odkrili prisotnost vektorja na številnih novih obrobnih območjih območja z omejitvami.
Consequently, the restricted zone related to Spain should be extended taking into account of the data available on the ecology of the vector and the evolution of its seasonal activity.
Zato je treba ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih podatkov o ekologiji vektorja in razvoju njegove sezonske aktivnosti razširiti območje z omejitvami za Španijo.
Portugal has informed the Commission that no virus has circulated in the councils of Oleiros, Sertã and Vila de Rei since November 2005.
Portugalska je obvestila Komisijo, da virus že od novembra 2005 ni prisoten v provincah Oleiros, Sertã in Vila de Rei.
Consequently, these councils should be considered free of bluetongue and, on the basis of the substantiated request submitted by Portugal, deleted from the areas listed for restricted zones.
Navedene province torej veljajo za proste bolezni modrikastega jezika in se ob predložitvi obrazložene zahteve Portugalske črtajo s seznama območij, ki so navedena kot območja z omejitvami.
Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2005/393/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
This Decision shall apply from the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta odločba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 18 August 2006.
V Bruslju, 18. avgusta 2006
Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/273/EC (OJ L 99, 7.4.2006, p. 35).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/273/ES (UL L 99, 7.4.2006, str. 35).
In Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC, the list of restricted zones in Zone E (serotype 4) which relates to Spain is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Odločbi 2005/393/ES se seznam območij z omejitvami v območju E (serotip 4) za Španijo nadomesti z naslednjim:
Autonomous Region of Extremadura: provinces of Cáceres, Badajoz
avtonomna regija Ekstremadura: provinci Cáceres, Badajoz
Autonomous Region of Andalucia: provinces of Cádiz, Córdoba, Huelva, Jaén (comarcas of Alcalá la Real, Andújar, Huelma, Jaén, Linares, Santiesteban del Puerto, Ubeda), Málaga, Sevilla
avtonomna regija Andaluzija: province Cádiz, Córdoba, Huelva, Jaén (comarcas Alcalá la Real, Andújar, Huelma, Jaén, Linares, Santiesteban del Puerto, Ubeda), Málaga, Sevilla
Autonomous Region of Castilla-La Mancha: provinces of Albacete (comarca of Alcaraz), Ciudad Real, Toledo
avtonomna regija Castilla-La Mancha: province Albacete (comarca Alcaraz), Ciudad Real, Toledo
Autonomous Region of Castilla y León: provinces of Avila (comarcas of Arenas de San Pedro, Candeleda, Cebreros, Las Navas del Marqués, Navaluenga, Sotillo de la Adrada), Salamanca (comarcas of Béjar, Ciudad Rodrigo and Sequeros)
avtonomna regija Castilla y León: province Avila (comarcas Arenas de San Pedro, Candeleda, Cebreros, Las Navas del Marqués, Navaluenga, Sotillo de la Adrada), Salamanca (comarcas Béjar, Ciudad Rodrigo in Sequeros)
Autonomous Region of Madrid: province of Madrid (comarcas of Alcalá de Henares, Aranjuez, Arganda del Rey, Colmenar Viejo, El Escorial, Griñón, Municipio de Madrid, Navalcarnero, San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Torrelaguna, Villarejo de Salvanés).’
avtonomna regija Madrid: provinca Madrid (comarcas Alcalá de Henares, Aranjuez, Arganda del Rey, Colmenar Viejo, El Escorial, Griñón, Municipio de Madrid, Navalcarnero, San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Torrelaguna, Villarejo de Salvanés).“
In Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC, the list of restricted zones in Zone E (serotype 4) which relates to Portugal is replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Odločbi 2005/393/ES se seznam območij z omejitvami v območju E (serotip 4) za Portugalsko nadomesti z naslednjim:
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Algarve: all concelhos
regionalni kmetijski urad Algarve: vsi concelhos
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Alentejo: all concelhos
regionalni kmetijski urad Alentejo: vsi concelhos
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Ribatejo e Oeste: concelhos of Almada, Barreiro, Moita, Seixal, Sesimbra, Montijo, Coruche, Setúbal, Palmela, Alcochete, Benavente, Salvaterra de Magos, Almeirim, Alpiarça, Chamusca, Constância, Abrantes and Sardoal
regionalna kmetijska urada Ribatejo in Oeste: concelhos Almada, Barreiro, Moita, Seixal, Sesimbra, Montijo, Coruche, Setúbal, Palmela, Alcochete, Benavente, Salvaterra de Magos, Almeirim, Alpiarça, Chamusca, Constância, Abrantes in Sardoal
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Beira Interior: concelhos of Penamacor, Fundão, Idanha-a-Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-Nova, Vila Velha de Ródão and Mação.’
regionalni kmetijski urad Beira Interior: concelhos Penamacor, Fundão, Idanha-a-Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-Nova, Vila Velha de Ródão in Mação.“
appointing members of the Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents for a new term of office
o imenovanju članov Znanstvenega odbora za omejitve poklicne izpostavljenosti kemičnim snovem za nov mandat
Having regard to Commission Decision 95/320/EC of 12 July 1995 setting up a Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents [1], hereinafter referred to as ‘the Committee’, and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije 95/320/ES z dne 12. julija 1995 o ustanovitvi Znanstvenega odbora za omejitve poklicne izpostavljenosti kemičnim snovem [1], v nadaljevanju „Odbor“, in zlasti člena 3 Sklepa,
Having regard to the list of candidates submitted by the Member States,
ob upoštevanju seznama kandidatov, ki so ga predložile države članice,
Article 3(1) of Decision 95/320/EC provides that the Committee shall be composed of not more than 21 members selected from among suitable candidates proposed by the Member States and reflecting the full range of scientific expertise which is necessary to fulfil the mandate of the Committee.
Člen 3(1) Sklepa 95/320/ES določa, da je Odbor sestavljen iz največ 21 članov, izbranih med primernimi kandidati, ki jih predlagajo države članice in ki predstavljajo vsa znanstvena področja, potrebna za izpolnitev pooblastil Odbora.
Article 3(2) of Decision 95/320/EC provides that the Commission shall appoint the members of the Committee, on the basis of their proven scientific expertise and experience, having regard to the need to ensure that the various specific areas are covered.
Člen 3(2) Sklepa 95/320/ES določa, da Komisija imenuje člane Odbora na podlagi dokazanega strokovnega znanja in izkušenj ter ob tem upošteva potrebo po pokritosti različnih specifičnih področij.
Article 3(4) of Decision 95/320/EC provides that the term of office of the members of the Committee shall be three years and that their appointment shall be renewable.
Člen 3(4) navedenega Sklepa določa, da traja mandat za člane Odbora tri leta in da so lahko ponovno imenovani.
After the expiry of the three-year period, members of the Committee remain in office until they are replaced or until their appointments are renewed.
Po koncu triletnega obdobja člani Odbora še naprej opravljajo svoje funkcije, dokler jih ne zamenjajo ali ponovno imenujejo.
The Commission Decision of 2 October 2002 appointed the members of the Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents for the third term of office from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2005 [2].
Komisija je s Sklepom z dne 2. oktobra 2002 imenovala člane Znanstvenega odbora za omejitve poklicne izpostavljenosti kemičnim snovem za tretji mandat od 1. aprila 2002 do 31. marca 2005 [2].
It is therefore necessary to appoint the members of that Committee for a fourth term of office (from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2009).
Zato je treba imenovati člane omenjenega Odbora za četrti mandat (od 1. julija 2006 do 30. junija 2009).
The Commission consulted the Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of Decision 95/320/EC,
Komisija se je posvetovala z državami članicami v skladu s členom 3(2) Sklepa 95/320/ES –
The Commission appoints the following members of the Scientific Committee for Occupational Exposure Limits to Chemical Agents for the term of office from 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2009:
Komisija imenuje naslednje člane Znanstvenega odbora za omejitve poklicne izpostavljenosti kemičnim snovem za mandat od 1. julija 2006 do 30. junija 2009:
Italy
Italija,
Germany
Nemčija,
Dominique, Dr Lison
Dr. Lison Dominique,
Belgium
Belgija,
Fabiánová, Dr Eleonóra
Dr. Eleonóra Fabiánová,
Slovakia
Slovaška,
González, Dr Enrique
Dr. Enrique González,
Spain
Španija,
Hudak, Dr Aranka
Dr. Aranka Hudak,
Hungary
Madžarska,
Sweden
Švedska,
Meldrum, Mrs Maureen
Maureen Meldrum,
Pospischil, Dr Erich
Dr. Erich Pospischil,
Austria
Avstrija,
Pratt, Dr Iona
Dr. Iona Pratt,
Ireland
Irska,