natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This claim was examined, and where it was found that such feed costs had been included twice, the necessary adjustment was made to remove this double counting.
Ta zahtevek je bil proučen in če je bilo ugotovljeno, da so se ti stroški za krmo upoštevali dvakrat, se je opravila potrebna prilagoditev za odpravo dvojnega štetja.
In the absence of comments on the determination of the export price, the provisional conclusions as set out in recitals 32 to 34 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker na določitev izvozne cene ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (32) do (34) začasne uredbe.
In the absence of comments on the comparison of normal value and export prices, the provisional conclusions as set out in recital 35 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker na primerjavo normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi (35) začasne uredbe.
Sampled companies
Vzorčene družbe
Definitive individual dumping margins have been established for all 10 companies in the sample, following the methodology outlined in recital 36 of the provisional Regulation, adjusted where necessary to take account of the claims outlined in recitals 11 to 26 of this Regulation.
Za vseh deset vzorčenih družb so bile določene dokončne individualne stopnje dampinga po metodi, opisani v uvodni izjavi (36) začasne uredbe, po potrebi prilagojene, da se upoštevajo zahtevki, opisani v uvodnih izjavah (11) do (26) te uredbe.
Non-sampled companies
Nevzorčene družbe
In the absence of comments on the determination of the dumping margin for non-sampled companies, the provisional conclusions as set out in recitals 38 and 39 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker na določitev stopnje dampinga za nevzorčene družbe ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (38) in (39) začasne uredbe.
Non-cooperating companies
Nesodelujoče družbe
Similarly, in the absence of comments on the determination of the dumping margin for non-cooperating companies, the provisional conclusions as set out in recitals 40 and 41 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker na določitev stopnje dampinga za nesodelujoče družbe prav tako ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (40) in (41) začasne uredbe.
On this basis, the definitive dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Na tej podlagi so dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Marine Harvest Norway AS, Postbox 4102 Dreggen, N-5835 Bergen
Marine Harvest Norway AS, Postbox 4102 Dreggen, 5835 Bergen, Norveška
Fjord Seafood Sales AS and Fjord Seafood Norway AS, Toftsundet, N-8900 Brønnøysund
Fjord Seafood Sales AS in Fjord Seafood Norway AS, Toftsundet, 8900 Brønnøysund, Norveška
Pan Fish Norway AS, Grimmergata 5, N-6002 Ålesund
Pan Fish Norway AS, Grimmergata 5, 6002 Ålesund, Norveška
Stolt Sea Farm AS, Grev Wedels plass 5, N-0151 Oslo
Stolt Sea Farm AS, Grev Wedels plass 5, 0151 Oslo, Norveška
Follalaks AS, N-8286 Nordfold
Follalaks AS, 8286 Nordfold, Norveška
Nordlaks Oppdrett AS, Boks 224, N-8455 Stokmarknes
Nordlaks Oppdrett AS, Boks 224, 8455 Stokmarknes, Norveška
Hydrotech AS, Bentnesveien 50, N-6512 Kristiansund
Hydrotech AS, Bentnesveien 50, 6512 Kristiansund, Norveška
Grieg Seafood AS, C. Sundtsgt 17/19, N-5804 Bergen
Grieg Seafood AS, C. Sundtsgt 17/19, 5804 Bergen, Norveška
Sinkaberg-Hansen AS, Postbox 134, N-7901 Rørvik
Sinkaberg-Hansen AS, Postbox 134, 7901 Rørvik, Norveška
Seafarm Invest AS, N-8764 Lovund
Seafarm Invest AS, 8764 Lovund, Norveška
Weighted average for cooperating companies not included in the sample
Tehtano povprečje za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec.
Residual margin
Preostala stopnja
In accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, it is concluded that the dumping margin for Nordlaks Oppdrett AS is de minimis, as its margin of dumping is below 2 %.
V skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe se sklene, da je stopnja dampinga za Nordlaks Oppdrett AS de minimis stopnja, saj je stopnja dampinga te družbe nižja od 2 %.
Definition of Community production and Community industry
Opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti in industrije Skupnosti
Following disclosure of the provisional findings, a large number of claims and allegations concerning the assessment of Community production, the definition of the Community industry and the selection of the sample of Community producers was received.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev so bili prejeti številni zahtevki in trditve v zvezi z oceno proizvodnje Skupnosti, opredelitvijo industrije Skupnosti in izbiro vzorca proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The Commission thus deepened the injury investigation and carried out additional analysis on data provided by all Community producers.
Zato je Komisija razširila preiskavo škode in izvedla dodatno analizo podatkov, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Skupnosti.
In addition, where necessary, more detailed information was requested from all the companies forming the Community industry at provisional stage.
Poleg tega so se od vseh družb, ki so bile del industrije Skupnosti v začasni fazi, zahtevale natančnejše informacije.
This has allowed to establish the final determinations for the Community production, the Community industry and to strengthen the accuracy and consistency of the data used for assessing all the injury indicators.
To je omogočilo oblikovanje končnih ugotovitev v zvezi s proizvodnjo Skupnosti in industrijo Skupnosti ter večjo natančnost in doslednost podatkov, ki so bili uporabljeni pri ocenjevanju kazalnikov škode.
Several exporting producers and producers related to Norwegian exporters repeated their claim that they should be included in the definition of the Community production.
Več proizvajalcev izvoznikov in proizvajalcev, povezanih z norveškimi izvozniki, je ponovno zahtevalo, da se jih vključi v opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti.
The Commission re-examined all the arguments, which were already raised at provisional stage, in support of the claim.
Komisija je ponovno proučila vse utemeljitve, navedene v podporo zahtevku, ki so bile izpostavljene že v začasni fazi.
However, in the light of the provisions of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, it was considered, that the relationship between these related producers and the exporters or importers of the dumped product was such as to cause the related producers concerned to behave differently from non-related producers.
Vendar pa je v okviru določb člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe veljalo, da so se zaradi razmerja med temi povezanimi proizvajalci in izvozniki oziroma uvozniki dampinškega proizvoda zadevni povezani proizvajalci vedli drugače od nepovezanih proizvajalcev.
Indeed, it is recalled that five producers located in the EU, which are part of large Norwegian groups involved in the production and sales of the product concerned, provided written submissions and submitted questionnaire replies.
Res pa je treba opomniti, da je pet proizvajalcev, ki se nahajajo v EU in pripadajo večjim skupinam norveških proizvajalcev, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega proizvoda, predložilo pisna stališča in izpolnjene vprašalnike.
The written submissions largely mirrored the arguments raised by Norwegian producers in the context of the investigation.
Pisna stališča so v glavnem odražala utemeljitve, ki so jih v okviru preiskave izpostavili norveški proizvajalci.
Although it was found that these EU companies also suffered from the price depression and lost market share in view of dumped imports from Norway, they opposed the initiation of investigation and the imposition of any anti-dumping measures.
Čeprav je bilo ugotovljeno, da so te družbe EU prav tako utrpele padec cen in izgubile tržni delež zaradi dampinškega uvoza iz Norveške, pa so nasprotovale začetku preiskave in uvedbi kakršnih koli protidampinških ukrepov.
It is considered that this behaviour is largely influenced by their relationship to exporters in the country concerned.
Meni se, da je na tak odziv vplivala njihova povezava z izvozniki v zadevni državi.
Consequently, in accordance with the basic Regulation the output of these other producers was not taken into consideration when calculating Community production.
Zato se v skladu z osnovno uredbo proizvodnja teh proizvajalcev ni upoštevala pri izračunu proizvodnje Skupnosti.
The findings set out in recital 44 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (44) začasne uredbe se zato potrdijo.
The further investigation confirmed that the estimated total Community production of the product concerned was around 22000 tonnes during the IP.
V nadaljnji preiskavi je bilo potrjeno, da je bila predvidena celotna proizvodnja zadevnega proizvoda Skupnosti v OP približno 22000 ton.
With regard to Community industry, the detailed analysis of the data received from the salmon industry indicated that some companies either did not produce salmon any longer, or they did not produce it during the IP, or they exclusively produced certain types of salmon, or that they fell into receivership during the IP, or did not provide data in the format requested.
Glede industrije Skupnosti je natančna analiza podatkov, ki jih je posredovala industrija lososa, pokazala, da določene družbe lososa ne proizvajajo več, da ga niso več proizvajale v OP, da so proizvajale samo določene vrste lososa, da so bile v OP v postopku prisilne poravnave ali da niso predložile podatkov v zahtevani obliki.
This led to the conclusion that only data supplied by 15 Community producers which were complainants or which explicitly supported the complaint could be taken into account for the definition of the Community industry.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se pri opredelitvi industrije Skupnosti upoštevajo samo podatki, ki jih je predložilo 15 proizvajalcev Skupnosti pritožnikov ali proizvajalcev, ki so pritožbo izrecno podprli.
This had an impact on the macroeconomic injury indicators, established on the level of the whole Community industry, in particular, production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, employment and productivity.
To je vplivalo na makroekonomske kazalnike škode, določene na ravni celotne industrije Skupnosti, zlasti na ravni proizvodnje, proizvodne zmogljivosti, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, obsega prodaje, tržnega deleža, zaposlovanja in produktivnosti.
The revised data is described in detail in recitals 61 to 75 below.
Spremenjeni podatki so natančneje opisani v uvodnih izjavah (61) do (75) v nadaljevanju.
The further investigation showed that the 15 cooperating complaining Community producers had produced around 18000 tonnes of salmon during the IP.
Nadaljnja preiskava je pokazala, da je v OP 15 sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti pritožnikov proizvedlo približno 18000 ton lososa.
This represents around 82 % of the estimated total Community production of the product concerned, as established in recital 38 above, in other words it constitutes a major proportion of the Community production.
To predstavlja 82 % predvidene celotne proizvodnje zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnosti, določene v uvodni izjavi (38) zgoraj, kar pomeni večji delež proizvodnje Skupnosti.
The complaining Community producers are therefore deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Šteje se, da so proizvajalci Skupnosti pritožniki del industrije Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Sampling for injury assessment purposes
Vzorčenje za namene ocene škode
It is recalled that in view of the large number of producers of farmed salmon in the Community, the application of sampling techniques was foreseen in the notice of initiation for the assessment of injury.
Treba je opomniti, da je bila zaradi številnih proizvajalcev gojenega lososa v Skupnosti v obvestilu o začetku za oceno škode predvidena uporaba tehnik vzorčenja.
In the submissions received after disclosure of the provisional findings some interested parties claimed that the sample of Community producers was not representative.
V stališčih, prejetih po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev, so nekatere zainteresirane stranke trdile, da vzorec proizvajalcev Skupnosti ni bil reprezentativen.
It has been alleged that some companies are specialised and fully dependent on the production of organic salmon, which is different from conventional salmon and that the injury indicators have not been established in an accurate manner.
Trdilo se je, da so nekatere družbe specializirane in popolnoma odvisne od ekološke proizvodnje lososa, ki se od običajne proizvodnje razlikuje, ter da kazalniki škode niso bili določeni natančno.
The Commission carried out additional analysis of data provided by Community producers, including all producers forming the sample.
Komisija je izvedla dodatno analizo podatkov, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Skupnosti, v kateri so bili vključeni vsi vzorčeni proizvajalci.
The additional analysis confirmed that the core production of the Community producers remained conventional salmon.
Dodatna analiza je potrdila, da je glavni del proizvodnje proizvajalcev Skupnosti še vedno običajna proizvodnja lososa.
However, where it was found that the sampled companies produced organic salmon, it was considered that organic salmon should be disregarded in this investigation given that organic salmon has in general a higher cost of production and a higher sales price.
Kadar je bilo ugotovljeno, da vzorčene družbe proizvajajo lososa ekološko, pa se je menilo, da se tako gojeni losos v tej preiskavi ne upošteva, glede na to, da sta z ekološko proizvodnjo povezana višji strošek proizvodnje in višja prodajna cena.
Therefore, all the injury indicators discussed below have been re-assessed, by excluding organic salmon from the analysis.
Zato so bili vsi kazalniki škode, obravnavani v nadaljevanju, ponovno ocenjeni, ekološka proizvodnja pa v analizo ni bila vključena.
Injury investigation and sampling techniques
Preiskava škode in tehnike vzorčenja
Some exporting producers observed that some injury indicators were established on the basis of the information verified at the level of the sample and some on the basis of data collected at the level of the Community industry as a whole.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so opazili, da so bili nekateri kazalniki škode določeni na podlagi informacij, preverjenih na ravni vzorca, nekateri pa na podlagi podatkov, zbranih na ravni industrije Skupnosti kot celote.
On this basis, they alleged that the injury analysis has not been established in an objective manner.
Na podlagi tega so trdili, da analiza škode ni bila izvedena objektivno.
This allegation has to be rejected.
To trditev je treba zavrniti.
In case of sampling, it is established practice to assess and analyse the microeconomic or performance-related injury indicators at the level of the sampled Community industry and to assess and analyse the macroeconomic injury indicators on the basis of information collected at the level of the entire Community industry.
V primeru vzorčenja je ustaljena praksa, da se ocenijo in analizirajo makroekonomski in s storilnostjo povezani kazalniki škode na ravni vzorčene industrije Skupnosti ter da se ocenijo in analizirajo makroekonomski kazalniki škode na podlagi informacij, zbranih na ravni celotne industrije Skupnosti.
It is recalled that the analysis of injury is based on:
Treba je opomniti, da analiza škode temelji na:
the injury indicators, such as sales prices, stocks, profitability, return on investment, cash flow, investments, ability to raise capital and wages, which were established on the basis of the information verified at the level of the sample; and
kazalnikih škode, na primer prodajnih cenah, zalogah, dobičkonosnosti, donosnosti naložb, denarnem toku, naložbah, zmožnosti zbiranja kapitala in plačah, ki so bili določeni na podlagi informacij, preverjenih na ravni vzorca; ter
the other injury indicators, such as production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity and magnitude of the margin of dumping which were established on the basis of data collected at the level of the Community industry as a whole.
drugih kazalnikih škode, na primer na proizvodnji, proizvodni zmogljivosti, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, obsegu prodaje, tržnemu deležu, zaposlovanju, produktivnosti in višini stopnje dampinga, ki so bili določeni na podlagi podatkov, zbranih na ravni industrije Skupnosti kot celote.
The information mentioned supra (b) can be obtained from different sources, such as the complaint and questionnaire replies from individual producers and can be cross-checked with data available from producer associations or government sources.
Informacije, omenjene v (b) zgoraj, se lahko pridobijo iz različnih virov, na primer iz pritožbe in izpolnjenih vprašalnikov posameznih proizvajalcev, in se lahko navzkrižno preverijo s podatki, ki jih predložijo združenja proizvajalcev ali vladni viri.
The exporting producers did not substantiate or explain how and why the injury investigation using the two sources mentioned supra (a) and (b) was not objective or which injury factor was not objectively examined.
Proizvajalci izvozniki niso utemeljili ali razložili v kakšnem smislu in zakaj preiskava škode z uporabo dveh virov, omenjenih v (a) in (b) zgoraj, ni bila objektivna ali kateri dejavnik škode ni bil objektivno preverjen.
On this basis, their claim had to be rejected.
Na podlagi tega je bilo treba njihov zahtevek zavrniti.
Some interested parties further claimed that the approach chosen by the Commission to establish the injury may lead to unrepresentative results because at provisional stage data from one company selected for the sample, Celtic Atlantic Salmon, was only used for the purpose of calculating undercutting and underselling, but not for establishing the other injury indicators.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so nadalje trdile, da so lahko zaradi pristopa, ki ga je za določitev škode izbrala Komisija, rezultati nereprezentativni, ker so bili podatki vzorčene družbe Celtic Atlantic Salmon v začasni fazi uporabljeni samo za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen in prodaje po prenizkih cenah, ne pa za določitev drugih kazalnikov škode.
After having carefully considered this claim and deepened the investigation, it was considered that the undercutting and underselling should be established by excluding this company from the sample because this producer did not produce farmed salmon during the period considered and therefore some of the data and information requested in the questionnaire was simply not available for that producer.
Po natančni obravnavi zahtevka in razširjeni preiskavi je bilo ocenjeno, da je treba nelojalno nižanje cen in prodajo po prenizkih cenah določiti z izključitvijo te družbe iz vzorca, saj ta proizvajalec lososa ni gojil med zadevnim obdobjem, zato nekateri podatki in informacije, zahtevani v vprašalniku, za tega proizvajalca preprosto niso bili na voljo.
However, the exclusion of the data submitted by this company did not lead to significantly different undercutting or underselling calculations.
Vendar pa neupoštevanje podatkov, ki jih je predložila ta družba, ni povzročilo velikih razlik pri izračunu nelojalnega nižanja cen in prodaje po prenizkih cenah.
On this basis, it is confirmed that the injury indicators as well as undercutting and underselling calculations at definitive stage are now established on the basis of the verified information provided by the other five producers in the Community, listed in recital 7 of the provisional Regulation.
Na podlagi tega se potrdi, da se sedaj, v zaključni fazi, kazalniki škode ter izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen in prodaje po prenizkih cenah določijo na podlagi preverjenih informacij, ki jih je predložilo preostalih pet proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, naštetih v uvodni izjavi (7) začasne uredbe.
The further investigation showed that the accumulated production of the five Community producers which were selected for the sample and fully cooperated in the investigation was around 48 % of the Community industry’s production of farmed salmon supporting the complaint.
Nadaljnja preiskava je pokazala, da je skupna proizvodnja petih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so bili izbrani za vzorec in so pri preiskavi v celoti sodelovali, znašala približno 48 % proizvodnje gojenega lososa v industriji Skupnosti, zaradi česar je pritožba utemeljena.
It is therefore confirmed that the selection of the sample of Community producers was based on the largest representative volume of production that could be reasonably investigated within the time available in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation and that the sample is fully representative.
Na podlagi tega se potrdi, da je izbira vzorca proizvajalcev Skupnosti temeljila na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu proizvodnje, ki ga je bilo mogoče ustrezno pregledati v razpoložljivem času v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe, zato je vzorec popolnoma reprezentativen.
Information available for inspection by interested parties
Informacije, ki so na voljo zainteresiranim strankam
Some Norwegian exporting producers further claimed that most of the Community producers’ files available for inspection by interested parties were not complete.
Nekateri norveški proizvajalci izvozniki so nadalje trdili, da večina dokumentov proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so bili na voljo zainteresiranim strankam, ni bilo popolnih.
They observed that some Community producers (including companies in the sample) did not reply to the sampling form intended for the selection of a sample of Community producers.
Ugotovili so, da nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti (vključno z vzorčenimi družbami) niso izpolnili obrazca za vzorčenje, ki je bil namenjen izbiri vzorca proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Furthermore, they argued that two companies selected in the sample did not reply to the anti-dumping questionnaire intended for Community producers in the format requested.
Nadalje so trdili, da dve vzorčeni družbi vprašalnika glede protidampinških ukrepov, predvidenega za proizvajalce Skupnosti, nista izpolnili v zahtevani obliki.
The exporting producers therefore concluded that their selection in the sample was not warranted and thus that the sample was unrepresentative.
Zato so proizvajalci izvozniki ugotovili, da izbira teh proizvajalcev za vzorec ni utemeljena, vzorec pa ni reprezentativen.
It is recalled that in the light of the comments received during the investigation and after disclosure of provisional findings, the Commission deepened its investigation and requested all parties to complete their files in view of Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Treba je opozoriti, da je Komisija na podlagi pripomb, prejetih med preiskavo in po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev, svojo preiskavo razširila in od vseh strank zahtevala, da svoje dokumente dopolnijo v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
Companies which did not provide the requested information or which did not give more detailed precisions were excluded from the investigation.
Družbe, ki zahtevanih informacij niso predložile ali niso zagotovile natančnejših podatkov, so bile iz preiskave izključene.
In this context, it should be recalled, however, that all sampled companies have been investigated on the spot and that any missing information was provided during the investigation.
V zvezi s tem pa je treba opomniti, da je bila v primeru vseh vzorčenih družb opravljena preiskava na kraju samem in so bili vsi manjkajoči podatki predloženi med preiskavo.
The completed files in public versions were also made available to all interested parties, some of which inspected them several times.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam je bila na voljo javna različica izpolnjenih dokumentov in nekatere stranke so jih pregledale večkrat.
It is therefore considered that the selection of those Community producers was warranted and that the sample of Community producers is representative.
Zato se ocenjuje, da je bila izbira omenjenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti utemeljena in je vzorec proizvajalcev Skupnosti reprezentativen.