natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To this end, they argued that neither bolts (CN code 73181570), nor self-tapping, slotted and cross-recessed screws of stainless steel (CN codes 73181410 and 73181551) should be considered as one single product category with the other fasteners under investigation because of alleged (i) different physical properties, nature and quality of these fasteners, (ii) different end-uses, (iii) different consumers’ tastes and habits and (iv) different CN codes, which in their view would show that bolts and screws do not constitute one single category of product.
V ta namen so trdili, da se niti sornikov (oznaka KN 73181570) niti samovreznih vijakov, vijakov z ravno ali križno zarezo iz nerjavnega jekla (oznake KN 73181410 in 73181551) ne bi smelo obravnavati kot kategorijo enega samega izdelka z drugimi pritrdilnimi elementi iz preiskave zaradi domnevnih (i) različnih fizikalnih lastnosti, narave in kakovosti teh pritrdilnih elementov, (ii) različnih končnih uporab, (iii) različnih okusov in navad potrošnikov ter (iv) različnih oznak KN, ki po njihovem mnenju kažejo na to, da sorniki in vijaki ne predstavljajo kategorije enega samega izdelka.
In the case at hand, the investigation has shown that all types of fasteners under consideration share, from a user’s perspective, similar basic physical and technical characteristic and uses, i.e. they are threaded stainless steel metal pins, used to join things, by means of rotation of the fastening devices.
V tem primeru je preiskava pokazala, da imajo vse obravnavane vrste pritrdilnih elementov z vidika potrošnikov podobne osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe, tj. gre za kovinske zatiče iz nerjavnega jekla z navojem, ki se z vrtenjem pritrdilnih naprav uporabljajo za spajanje stvari.
Thus, all these fasteners fall under the same four digit heading of the Combined Nomenclature.
Torej se vsi ti pritrdilni elementi uvrščajo pod isto štirimestno oznako kombinirane nomenklature.
Consequently, the claim to further limit the product scope has to be rejected.
Zato je treba zahtevek za dodatno omejitev obsega izdelka zavrniti.
Since no other comments were submitted, the findings concerning the product concerned and the like product as set out in recitals 10 to 18 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bila predložena nobena druga pripomba, se ugotovitve glede zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka iz uvodnih izjav (10) do (18) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
No comments concerning sampling of exporting producers in Taiwan, Community producers and importers have been submitted following the imposition of provisional measures.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov ni bila predložena nobena pripomba glede vzorčenja proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Tajvanu, proizvajalcev Skupnosti in uvoznikov.
The findings set out in recitals 19 to 32 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (19) do (32) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
No new comments concerning MET were submitted following the imposition of provisional measures.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov ni bila predložena nobena nova pripomba glede TGO.
The findings set out in recitals 33 to 54 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (33) do (54) začasne uredbe se potrdijo.
One cooperating exporting producer in Vietnam expressed its disappointment at the rejection of its claim for IT, despite its cooperation with the investigation.
En sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik v Vietnamu je izrazil razočaranje, ker je bil njegov zahtevek za IO kljub njegovemu sodelovanju v preiskavi zavrnjen.
It also said that the rejection of its claim for IT, as well as those of two other Vietnamese exporters, lead to the imposition of the same provisional anti-dumping duty on imports from all exporting producers in Vietnam.
Dodal je še, da je zavrnitev njegovega zahtevka za IO, kot tudi zahtevkov dveh drugih vietnamskih izvoznikov, privedla do uvedbe iste začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz vseh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Vietnamu.
As set out in recital 60 of the provisional Regulation, the company in question was not able to demonstrate that it met the conditions of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation for being granted IT.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (60) začasne uredbe, zadevna družba ni bila sposobna dokazati, da je izpolnila pogoje iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe, s čimer bi ji bila IO odobrena.
Furthermore, no argument or evidence was submitted which could alter this finding and, therefore, Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation had to apply to Vietnam, as a whole.
Poleg tega ni bila predložena nobena utemeljitev ali dokaz, ki bi lahko spremenil to ugotovitev, zato se je moral člen 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe uporabljati za ves Vietnam.
This means that the same measure applies to all exporting producers in Vietnam.
To pomeni, da se isti ukrep uporablja za vse proizvajalce izvoznike v Vietnamu.
In the absence of any other comments, the findings set out in recitals 55 to 61 of the provisional Regulation concerning individual treatment are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (55) do (61) začasne uredbe v zvezi z individualno obravnavo, potrdijo.
Taiwan had provisionally been chosen as the analogue market economy third country for the purpose of establishing normal value for exporting producers not granted MET.
Tajvan je bil začasno izbran kot primerljiva tržnogospodarska tretja država za namen določitve normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, no party raised any comments concerning the determination of the normal value in the analogue country.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov ni nobena stranka predložila kakršne koli pripombe glede določitve normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
Thus, the findings set out in recitals 62 to 64 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (62) do (64) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Methodology applied for the determination of normal value
Metodologija, uporabljena za določitev normalne vrednosti
Four Thai exporting producers argued that the selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses and the profit realised on domestic sales in another country, in this case Taiwan, cannot be used for constructing their normal value.
Štirje tajski proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da se prodajni, splošni in administrativni („PSA“) stroški ter dobiček, ustvarjen z domačo prodajo v drugi državi, v tem primeru na Tajskem, ne morejo uporabiti za konstruiranje njihove normalne vrednosti.
However, as set out in recital 80 of the provisional Regulation, these exporting producers had no representative sales of the like product, or other products in the same general category, in the ordinary course of trade.
Vendar pa, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (80) začasne uredbe, ti proizvajalci izvozniki med običajnim potekom trgovine niso imeli nobenih reprezentativnih količin podobnega izdelka ali drugih izdelkov v isti splošni kategoriji.
It was therefore, necessary to rely on another reasonable method for the calculation of SG&A expenses and profit as provided for by Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe nujno uporabiti drugo sprejemljivo metodo za izračun PSA stroškov in dobička.
In this respect, the use of Taiwanese SG&A expenses and profit was considered the most reasonable method because of (i) the representative domestic market, in terms of volumes and competition in terms of prices, for the like product in Taiwan; and (ii) the fact that the Taiwanese SSF industry controls the majority of SSF producers in all the countries under investigation, including some in Thailand (see recital 71 of the provisional Regulation).
V tem pogledu se je uporaba tajvanskih PSA stroškov in dobička izkazala za najbolj sprejemljivo metodo zaradi (i) reprezentativnega notranjega trga v smislu obsega in konkurence glede cen za podobni proizvod v Tajvanu; in (ii) dejstva, da tajvanska industrija PENJ nadzoruje večino proizvajalcev PENJ v vseh državah v preiskavi, vključno z nekaterimi na Tajskem (glej uvodno izjavo (71) začasne uredbe).
No information was provided to show that the profit so used would exceed the profit normally realised by other exporters or producers on sales of the same general category of products in Thailand.
Predložen ni bil noben podatek, ki bi pokazal, da bi tako uporabljen dobiček presegal dobiček, ki ga navadno ustvarijo drugi izvozniki ali proizvajalci pri prodaji iste splošne kategorije izdelkov na Tajskem.
No other comments were raised concerning the methodology applied for the determination of normal value and thus the methodology set out in recitals 65 to 72 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Izražena ni bila nobena druga pripomba v zvezi z metodologijo, uporabljeno za določitev normalne vrednosti, zato se metodologija iz uvodnih izjav (65) do (72) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments, the findings set out in recital 73 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (73) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the findings set out in recital 74 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (74) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the findings set out in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (76) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One Taiwanese exporting producer objected to the methodology used to determine normal value as set out in recital 79 of the provisional Regulation.
En tajski proizvajalec izvoznik je ugovarjal metodologiji, uporabljeni za določitev normalne vrednosti, kakor je določeno v uvodni izjavi (79) začasne uredbe.
The company claimed that it did not classify the different types of the product concerned according to the specifications given by the Commission as some of these fasteners were speciality fasteners.
Družba je trdila, da različnih vrst zadevnega izdelka ni razvrstila v skladu z navodili Komisije, ker so bili nekateri izmed teh pritrdilnih elementov posebni pritrdilni elementi.
It also claimed that the company had demonstrated during the on-spot verification, by way of drawings, samples and sales documentation, the unique product characteristics of its speciality fasteners exported to the Community.
Trdila je tudi, da je družba med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem s skicami, vzorci in prodajno dokumentacijo nazorno prikazala edinstvene lastnosti njenih posebnih pritrdilnih elementov, izvoženih v Skupnost.
In fact, the evidence collected during the verification visit indicated that these products are not falling within the CN codes under investigation.
Pravzaprav so dokazila, zbrana med preveritvenim obiskom, pokazala, da ti izdelki niso uvrščeni pod oznake KN v preiskavi.
In these circumstances, it was considered appropriate not to consider the exports of these products for the purposes of this investigation.
V teh okoliščinah se je zdelo primerno, da se izvoz teh izdelkov ne upošteva za namene te preiskave.
Findings for this company, including those on normal value as set out in recital 79 of the provisional Regulation, are based on its remaining exports which fell within the description of the product concerned.
Ugotovitve v zvezi s to družbo, vključno s tistimi iz uvodne izjave (79) začasne uredbe, temeljijo na preostalem izvozu, ki spada v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
For the normal value of its remaining exports, the company suggested some adjustments to the cost of production used for the provisional determination of its normal value (see recital 79 of the provisional Regulation).
V zvezi z normalno vrednostjo njenega preostalega izvoza je družba predlagala nekatere prilagoditve pri strošku proizvodnje, uporabljenem za začasno določitev njene normalne vrednosti (glej uvodno izjavo (79) začasne uredbe).
However, these adjustments were based on data which were not submitted either with the response to the questionnaire or during the verification visit and, thus, were not verifiable.
Vendar pa so te prilagoditve temeljile na informacijah, ki niso bile predložene ne k odgovoru na vprašalnik ne med preveritvenim obiskom in zato niso bile preverljive.
Furthermore, these adjustments were not supported by any information available on the record.
Poleg tega v evidenci ni bilo nobene informacije, ki bi podprla te prilagoditve.
Consequently, this claim concerning the cost of production should be rejected.
Zato je treba ta zahtevek v zvezi s stroškom proizvodnje zavrniti.
Another Taiwanese exporting producer claimed that there was certain double counting in the cost of production and the SG&A expenses used for the determination of normal value.
Nek drugi tajski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je prišlo do določenega dvojnega štetja pri strošku proizvodnje in PSA stroških, uporabljenih za določitev normalne vrednosti.
It argued that the SG&A expenses ratio submitted in the Profit and Loss table of its response to the questionnaire was not the correct one and that the SG&A expenses ratio given during the verification visit should be used instead.
Trdil je, da je razmerje med PSA stroški, predloženimi v izkazu poslovnega izida v njegovem odgovoru na vprašalnik, napačno in bi morali namesto njega upoštevati razmerje med PSA stroški, predloženimi med preveritvenim obiskom.
In this respect, it should be noted that the company did not make any correction on its Profit and Loss table before the verification visit.
V tem pogledu je treba opomniti, da družba pred preveritvenim obiskom ni vnašala nobenih popravkov v izkaz poslovnega izida.
The company provided a significantly revised table for the SG&A expenses at the very last stage of the verification, when it was too late for it to be verified.
Družba je predložila občutno spremenjen izkaz PSA stroškov v čisto zadnji fazi preiskave, ko je bilo že prepozno, da bi ga lahko preverili.
Consequently, and since the revised SG&A expenses did not link to other verified information available on the record, the claim was rejected and data derived from the Profit and Loss table submitted in the questionnaire response have been maintained in the dumping calculation, in line with the provisions of Article 6(8) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi tega in ker spremenjeni PSA stroški niso bili usklajeni z drugimi razpoložljivimi informacijami v evidenci, je bil zahtevek zavrnjen, informacije iz izkaza poslovnega izida, predložene ob izpolnjenem vprašalniku, pa so se upoštevale pri izračunu dampinga v skladu z določbami iz člena 6(8) osnovne uredbe.
The same Taiwanese exporting producer claimed that scrap materials must be deducted from the cost of the raw materials.
Isti tajvanski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da se morajo ostanki odšteti od stroška surovin.
The company claimed that since scrap is obtained from the production process, the income from its sales should be allowed to offset cost of production.
Ker se ostanki pridobijo v postopku proizvodnje, je družba trdila, da bi se moral dobiček od prodaje ostankov upoštevati pri izravnavi stroška proizvodnje.
However, it has not reported the amount of any such income.
Vendar pa ni prijavila zneska nobenega tovrstnega dobička.
In any event, any income from other products or by-products is not relevant for the calculation of the cost of production of the like product as it has not been a practice historically utilised by the company in allocating costs.
V nobenem primeru kakršen koli dobiček od drugih izdelkov ali stranskih izdelkov ni pomemben za izračun stroška proizvodnje podobnega izdelka, ker družba v preteklosti ni uporabila te prakse za razporeditev stroškov.
Therefore, the claim of the company should be rejected and the provisional findings confirmed.
Zato je treba zahtevek družbe zavrniti in potrditi začasne ugotovitve.
No other comments were submitted and, therefore, the findings set out in recitals 77 to 79 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Predložena ni bila nobena druga pripomba, zato se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (77) do (79) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One Thai exporting producer having some domestic sales made several claims relating to the calculation of the cost of production and the SG&A expenses used for the determination of its normal value.
En tajski proizvajalec izvoznik z nekaj domače prodaje se je večkrat pritožil v zvezi z izračunom stroška proizvodnje in PSA stroškov, uporabljenih za določitev njegove normalne vrednosti.
Furthermore, it stated that should the claims be accepted its domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade would be representative and could be used for the determination of normal value in Thailand.
Poleg tega je trdil, da bi v primeru sprejetja zahtevkov njegova domača prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovine bila reprezentativna in bi bila lahko uporabljena za določitev normalne vrednosti na Tajskem.
It should be noted that this company provided several revised versions of its questionnaire response during the verification visit to an extent that significantly impeded the investigation as it was not possible to reconcile any of the different versions with its accounts.
Opomniti je treba, da je ta družba med preveritvenim obiskom predložila več spremenjenih različic izpolnjenih vprašalnikov, tako da je občutno ovirala preiskavo, saj je bilo nemogoče uskladiti katero koli različico z njenim finančnim poročilom.
Nevertheless, all this information was examined as far as possible in line with the provisions of Article 6(8) of the basic Regulation.
Kljub vsemu so bili vse te informacije v skladu z določbami člena 6(8) osnovne uredbe proučene v največji možni meri.
It is noted that the cost of production, as reported by the company for a large number of product types, was significantly understated, in particular the cost of raw materials, and it was, therefore, corrected for the provisional dumping calculations.
Opomniti je treba, da je bil strošek proizvodnje, kakor ga je za več vrst izdelka prijavila družba, občutno podcenjen, zlasti strošek surovin, in je bil zato popravljen za začasne izračune dampinga.
As the company has not provided any substantiated information regarding its cost of production that would require a change in the dumping calculations, its claim regarding calculation of the cost of production has to be rejected.
Ker družba ni predložila nobenih utemeljenih informacij v zvezi z njenim stroškom proizvodnje, ki bi zahtevale spremembo v izračunih dampinga, je treba njen zahtevek v zvezi z izračunom stroška proizvodnje zavrniti.
This exporting producer claimed that income from sales of scrap should be deducted from the cost of raw materials in the cost of production of the like product.
Ta proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da bi se pri strošku proizvodnje podobnega izdelka moral dobiček od prodaje ostankov odšteti od stroška surovin.
However, no income from sales of scrap has been reported in the company’s Profit and Loss Table.
Vendar pa v izkazu poslovnega izida družbe ni bil prijavljen noben dobiček od prodaje ostankov.
Concerning the exporting producer’s claim to use a different level of SG&A expenses, it was established that, even if the claim was accepted, it would not lead to a situation where the company’s domestic sales could have been used as a basis for establishing normal value, as they would still not be made in the ordinary course of trade.
V zvezi z zahtevkom proizvajalcev izvoznikov za uporabo različnih ravni PSA stroškov je bilo ugotovljeno, da to tudi v primeru sprejetja zahtevka ne bi privedlo do stanja, kjer bi lahko bila za osnovo pri določitvi normalne vrednosti uporabljena domača prodaja družbe, saj slednja ne bi bila ustvarjena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Consequently, these claims regarding scrap and SG&A expenses should be rejected and the findings set out in recital 80 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato je treba te zahtevke v zvezi z ostanki in PSA stroški zavrniti in potrditi ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (80) začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, the findings set out in recital 81 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (81) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the findings set out in recitals 82 to 91 of the provisional Regulation concerning the establishment of the export price pursuant to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation for all countries concerned are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (82) do (91) začasne uredbe v zvezi z določitvijo izvozne cene za vse zadevne države v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the methodology and the findings set out in recitals 92 and 93 of the provisional Regulation concerning the comparison between normal value and export price are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, se metodologija in ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (92) in (93) začasne uredbe v zvezi s primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning the determination of the dumping margin, the methodology set out in recitals 94 to 100 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi z določitvijo stopnje dampinga, se metodologija iz uvodnih izjav (94) do (100) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe, veljajo naslednje dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve:
All other companies 27,4 %.
Vse druge družbe 27,4 %.
All other companies 24,6 %.
Vse druge družbe 24,6 %.
In the absence of any comments on the calculation of the provisional dumping margin for the two cooperating exporting producers in Malaysia, the findings as set out in recital 104 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi z izračunom začasne stopnje dampinga za dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika v Maleziji, se ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (104) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Consequently, as no dumping was found for any Malaysian exporting producer, the proceeding should be terminated as regards imports of the product concerned from Malaysia.
Ker za nobenega malezijskega proizvajalca izvoznika ni bil ugotovljen obstoj dampinga, se postopek glede uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Malezije zaključi.
In the absence of any comments on the situation concerning the Philippines, no dumping margin has been established.
Ker ni bilo nobene pripombe v zvezi s stanjem glede Filipinov, ni bila določena nobena stopnja dampinga.
Consequently, as stated above in recital 12, the proceeding should be terminated as regards imports of the product concerned from the Philippines.
Zato se, kakor je določeno v zgornji uvodni izjavi (12), postopek glede uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Filipinov zaključi.
In the absence of any further comments on the calculation of the provisional dumping margins for Taiwan, as set out in recitals 106 to 108 of the provisional Regulation, the definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
Ker ni bila predložena nobena dodatna pripomba v zvezi z izračunom začasnih stopenj dampinga za Tajvan, kakor je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (106) do (108) začasne uredbe, veljajo naslednje dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve:
Jin Shing Stainless Ind. Co. Ltd, Tao Yuan 18,8 %
Co. Ltd., Tao Yuan 18,8 %
Cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample 15,8 %
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili zajeti v vzorcu 15,8 %
All other companies 23,6 %.
Vse druge družbe 23,6 %.