natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This should include an assessment of the quality and consistency of the controls and should involve on-site audit activities.
Obsegati mora oceno kakovosti in doslednosti nadzora ter vključevati presojevalske aktivnosti na kraju samem.
The audit team will require the relevant technical expertise in order to address this audit objective.
Presojevalna skupina mora imeti ustrezno tehnično strokovno znanje za doseganje tega cilja presoje.
The audit system should also seek to assess whether the planned arrangements are suitable to achieve the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004, and in particular the single integrated multi-annual national control plan.
Sistem presoj mora prav tako oceniti, ali je načrtovana ureditev primerna za doseganje ciljev Uredbe (ES) št. 882/2004 in zlasti enotnega združenega večletnega nacionalnega načrta nadzora.
This should include assessing the suitability of official controls, with regard, for example, to their frequency and the methods applied, having regard to the structure of the production chain(s) and to production practices and volume.
Vključevati mora ocenjevanje primernosti uradnih nadzorov v zvezi z, na primer, njihovo pogostostjo in uporabljenimi metodami, ob upoštevanju strukture proizvodne verige (proizvodnih verig) ter proizvodnih metod in obsega proizvodnje.
The audit team should have substantial knowledge and understanding of system auditing, together with relevant technical input to address this audit objective.
Presojevalna skupina mora imeti precejšnje znanje in razumevanje sistema presojanja ter ustrezne tehnične podatke za doseganje tega cilja presoje.
In order to determine whether the planned arrangements are suitable to achieve the objectives set out in (c) above, the following should be considered:
Da bi ugotovili, ali je načrtovana ureditev primerna za doseganje ciljev iz točke (c) zgoraj, je treba upoštevati naslednje:
Audit criteria should include strategic objectives stemming from Regulations (EC) No 178/2002 and (EC) No 882/2004 (including the single integrated multi-annual national control plan) and national legislation.
kriteriji presoje morajo vključevati strateške cilje iz uredb (ES) št. 178/2002 in (ES) št. 882/2004 (vključno z enotnim združenim večletnim nacionalnim načrtom nadzora) ter nacionalne zakonodaje;
The primary focus of audits should be the control arrangements relating to the critical points for control in the production chain(s).
glavni poudarek presoj mora biti na nadzornih ureditvah v zvezi s kritičnimi točkami za nadzor v proizvodni verigi (proizvodnih verigah).
The emphasis should be on assessing whether planned arrangements are capable of delivering sufficient guarantees on (a) the safety of the end-product(s) and (b) compliance with other feed and food law requirements and with animal health and welfare rules.
Poudarek mora biti na ocenjevanju, ali je načrtovana ureditev zmožna zagotoviti ustrezna jamstva za (a) varnost končnega(-ih) proizvoda(-ov) in (b) skladnost z drugimi zahtevami zakonodaje o krmi in živilih ter predpisi za zdravje in dobro počutje živali.
In order to achieve this, audit(s) should where possible extend beyond and across administrative boundaries.
Za doseganje tega je treba presojo(-e), kadar je to mogoče, razširiti preko in zunaj upravnih meja.
Audit Reporting
Poročanje o presoji
Audit reports should contain clear conclusions stemming from the audit findings and, where appropriate, recommendations:
Poročila o presojah morajo vsebovati jasne sklepe, izhajajoče iz ugotovitev presoje in, kadar je to primerno, priporočila.
Conclusions should address the compliance with the planned arrangements, the effectiveness of the implementation, and the suitability of the planned arrangements to achieve the stated objectives, as appropriate.
Sklepi morajo ustrezno obravnavati skladnost z načrtovano ureditvijo, uspešnost izvajanja in primernost načrtovane ureditve za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
They should be based on objective evidence.
Temeljiti morajo na objektivnih dokazih.
In particular, where conclusions are drawn as to the planned arrangements' suitability to achieve the stated objectives, evidence may be obtained from the compilation and analysis of results from several audits.
Še zlasti v primeru sklepov v zvezi s primernostjo načrtovane ureditve za doseganje navedenih ciljev se lahko dokaze pridobi z zbiranjem in analizo rezultatov različnih presoj.
In this case conclusions should extend beyond the boundaries of individual establishments, units of authorities and authorities,
V tem primeru se sklepi razširijo preko mej posameznih ustanov, enot organov in organov.
Recommendations should address the end-result to be delivered rather than means of correcting non-compliance.
Priporočila morajo obravnavati pričakovani končni rezultat in ne sredstev odpravljanja neskladnosti.
Recommendations should be based on sound conclusions.
Priporočila morajo temeljiti na tehtnih sklepih.
Follow-up of Audit Outcome
Aktivnosti, ki sledijo izidu presoje
Where appropriate, an action plan should be drawn up and delivered by the auditee.
Kadar je to primerno, mora presojanec sestaviti in predložiti akcijski načrt.
It should propose time-bound corrective and preventive action to address any weakness identified by the audit or audit programme.
Vsebovati mora predlog časovno omejenega korektivnega in preventivnega ukrepanja za odpravo kakršnih koli slabosti, ki jih je ugotovila presoja ali program presoj.
The audit team should assess the suitability of the action plan and may be involved in verifying its subsequent implementation:
Presojevalna skupina mora oceniti primernost akcijskega načrta in lahko sodeluje pri preverjanju njegovega poznejšega izvajanja.
an Action plan enables the audit team to assess whether the proposed corrective and preventive action is sufficient to address the recommendations of the audit report.
Akcijski načrt omogoča presojevalni skupini ocenjevanje ustreznosti predlaganih korektivnih in preventivnih ukrepov za izpolnjevanje priporočil poročila o presoji.
Action plans should include risk-based prioritisation and time frames for completion of corrective and preventive action.
Akcijski načrti morajo vključevati prednostno razvrščanje na podlagi tveganja in časovne okvire za zaključek korektivnih in preventivnih ukrepov.
A wide range of different action plans could be considered satisfactory.
Sprejemljivih je lahko več različnih akcijskih načrtov.
It is for the auditee to choose from the various options available,
Med številnimi razpoložljivimi možnostmi mora izbirati presojanec.
Corrective and preventive action should not be confined to addressing specific technical requirements but should, where appropriate, include system-wide measures (for example communication, cooperation, coordination, reviewing and streamlining of control processes, and so forth).
Korektivno in preventivno ukrepanje ne sme biti omejeno na obravnavo posebnih tehničnih zahtev, ampak mora, kadar je to primerno, vključevati ukrepe za celotni sistem (na primer obveščanje, sodelovanje, koordinacija, pregledovanje in poenostavitev procesov nadzora itd.).
A root cause analysis of any non-compliance should be conducted by the auditee in order to determine the most appropriate corrective and preventive action.
Presojanec mora izvesti analizo osnovnih vzrokov kakršne koli neskladnosti, da določi najustreznejši korektivni in preventivni ukrep.
Any differences of opinion between the auditee and audit team should be resolved,
Treba je razrešiti vsa morebitna razhajanja mnenj med presojancem in presojevalno skupino.
Close-out: Mechanisms should be established to ensure that action plans are appropriate and that corrective and preventive actions are effectively completed in a timely manner.
Zaključek: Vzpostaviti je treba mehanizme za zagotavljanje ustreznosti akcijskih načrtov ter pravočasen in učinkovit zaključek korektivnih in preventivnih ukrepov.
Procedures for verifying the close out of the action plan should be agreed between the auditee and the audit team.
O postopkih za preverjanje zaključka akcijskega načrta se morata dogovoriti presojanec in presojevalna skupina.
Audit Review and Dissemination of Best Practice
Pregled presoje in razširjanje najboljše prakse
The implications of audit findings for other sectors and regions should be considered, particularly in Member States where controls are delegated to a number of competent authorities or are decentralised.
Upoštevati je treba posledice ugotovitev presoje za druge sektorje in regije, zlasti v državah članicah, kjer je pristojnost nadzora podeljena več pristojnim organom ali decentralizirana.
In particular, examples of best practice should be disseminated.
Še zlasti je treba razširjati primere najboljše prakse.
For this purpose, reports should be made available to other sectors and regions within the Member State and to the Commission.
Zato morajo biti poročila dostopna drugim sektorjem in regijam v državah članicah ter Komisiji.
Audit results should also be considered while planning the audit programme and in the context of the review of the single integrated multi-annual national control plan.
Izide presoje je treba upoštevati tudi pri načrtovanju programa presoj in v okviru pregleda enotnega združenega večletnega nacionalnega načrta nadzora.
Member States should ensure that competent authorities have sufficient implementing powers, and resources, with the appropriate authority, to establish, implement and maintain an effective audit system.
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da imajo pristojni organi ustrezna izvedbena pooblastila in vire ter ustrezen vpliv za vzpostavitev, izvajanje in ohranjanje učinkovitega sistema presoj.
The human and related resources required to manage, monitor and review the audit process should be made available, bearing in mind that all competent authorities and their control activities should be audited over a period not exceeding five years.
Na voljo morajo biti človeški in drugi z njimi povezani viri, potrebni za vodenje, spremljanje in pregledovanje procesa presoje, ob upoštevanju, da je treba vse pristojne organe in njihove nadzorne dejavnosti pregledati v obdobju največ petih let.
General guidance on the resources required for auditing is provided in ISO 19011.
Splošne smernice o virih, potrebnih za presojanje, so navedene v standardu ISO 19011.
In order to have the necessary expertise to fulfil the purpose and scope of the audit and audit programme(s), the audit team may include any combination of general and technical specialist auditors and technical experts.
Da bi zagotovili potrebno strokovno znanje za izpolnitev namena in obsega presoje in programa(-ov) presoj, lahko presojevalno skupino sestavlja kakršna koli kombinacija splošnih ali specializiranih presojevalcev in tehničnih izvedencev.
Care should be taken to ensure the objectivity and independence of the audit team, especially where technical experts are required.
Treba je zagotoviti objektivnost in neodvisnost presojevalne skupine, zlasti kadar so potrebni tehnični izvedenci.
To that end, the rotation of auditors and/or of audit teams may assist in achieving this.
K temu lahko pripomore kroženje presojevalcev in/ali presojevalnih skupin.
Auditor Competence
Kompetentnost presojevalca
Auditor competence and selection criteria should be defined under the following headings:
Kompetentnost presojevalca in merila za izbor morajo biti določena glede na naslednje točke:
generic knowledge and skills — audit principles, procedures and techniques; management/organisational skills,
splošno znanje in veščine – načela, postopki in tehnike presojanja; vodstvene/organizacijske sposobnosti,
specific technical knowledge and skills,
posebno tehnično znanje in veščine,
personal attributes,
osebne lastnosti,
education,
izobrazba,
work experience,
delovne izkušnje,
auditor training and experience.
usposabljanje za presojevalca in presojevalske izkušnje.
It is essential to put a mechanism in place to ensure auditors are consistent and their competencies are maintained.
Bistveno je vzpostaviti mehanizem, ki bo zagotovil doslednost presojevalcev in ohranjanje njihove kompetentnosti.
Competencies required by audit teams will vary depending on the area they are auditing within the control or supervision systems.
Kompetentnosti, ki jih potrebujejo presojevalne skupine, se bodo razlikovale glede na področje, ki ga presojajo v nadzornih sistemih.
As regards the technical knowledge and skills required by auditors, the training requirements for staff performing official controls (Chapter 1 of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004) should also be considered.
V zvezi s tehničnim znanjem in veščinami, ki jih potrebujejo presojevalci, je treba upoštevati tudi zahteve o usposobljenosti osebja, ki izvaja uradni nadzor (poglavje 1 Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 882/2004).
‘Guidelines for quality and/or environmental management systems auditing’, published by International Organisation for Standardisation, 1 October 2002.
„Smernice za presojanje sistemov vodenja kakovosti in/ali sistemov ravnanja z okoljem“, ki jih je 1. oktobra 2002 izdala Mednarodna organizacija za standardizacijo.
‘Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary’, published by the International Organisation for Standardisation, December 2000.
„Sistemi vodenja kakovosti – Osnove in slovar“, ki ga je decembra 2000 izdala Mednarodna organizacija za standardizacijo.
means the body that carries out the audit process. This may be an internal or external entity.
pomeni organ, ki izvaja proces presoje; lahko je notranji ali zunanji subjekt;
on the financial treatment to be applied, in the context of clearance of expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Section, in certain cases of irregularity by operators
o finančnih posledicah v okviru obračuna izdatkov, financiranih iz Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada, v določenih primerih nepravilnosti s strani gospodarskih subjektov
(notified under document number C(2006) 4324)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 4324)
(Only the Spanish, German, English, French, Italian, Dutch and Portuguese texts are authentic)
(Besedila v angleškem, francoskem, italijanskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, portugalskem in španskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [1], and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 729/70 z dne 21. aprila 1970 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [1] in zlasti člena 8(2) Uredbe,
After consulting the Fund Committee,
po posvetovanju z Odborom Sklada,
Article 8(1)(c) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 provides for the Member States to take the measures necessary to recover sums lost as a result of irregularities or negligence.
Člen 8(1)c Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 določa, da države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za izterjavo zneskov, izgubljenih zaradi nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti.
Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, in the absence of total recovery, the financial consequences of irregularities or negligence are to be borne by the Community, with the exception of the consequences of irregularities or negligence attributable to administrative authorities or other bodies of the Member States.
V skladu s členom 8(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70, če se zneski v celoti ne izterjajo, nosi finančne posledice nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti Skupnost, kar ne velja za posledice zaradi nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti, ki jih je mogoče pripisati upravam in ustanovam držav članic.
In its judgments in Cases C-34/89, Italy v Commission [2], C-54/95, Germany v Commission [3] and C-277/98 France v Commission [4], the Court of Justice has held that the Member States must take steps to rectify irregularities promptly.
V svojih sodbah v zadevah C-34/89 Italija proti Komisiji [2], C-54/95 Nemčija proti Komisiji [3] in C-277/98 Francija proti Komisiji [4] je Sodišče odločilo, da morajo države članice takoj sprejeti ukrepe za odpravljanje nepravilnosti.
It follows in particular from the judgment in Case C-34/89 that a Member State cannot be inactive for a period of four years from the moment of the first indication of an irregularity [5].
Iz sodbe v zadevi C-34/89 izhaja zlasti, da država članica v obdobju štirih let od trenutka prve navedbe nepravilnosti ne sme biti neaktivna [5].
Within that period the investigation should generally be conducted and a decision be taken on the initiation of recovery procedure.
V navedenem obdobju je treba običajno opraviti preiskavo in sprejeti odločitev o začetku postopka za izterjavo.
In Case C-54/95 the Court indicated that, in principle, the Member States have to start the recovery procedure within one year after the all relevant facts are known with regard to the irregularity.
V zadevi C-54/95 je sodišče navedlo, da mora država članica načeloma začeti s postopkom za izterjavo v roku enega leta po tem, ko so znana vsa pomembna dejstva v zvezi z nepravilnostjo.
To date, the Commission has evaluated the recovery proceedings carried out by the Member States as regards irregularities communicated under Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the common agricultural policy and the organisation of an information system in this field and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 283/72 [6] before 1 January 1999 and involving amounts of more than EUR 500000 in order to decide on the financial consequences of those irregularities in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70.
Do zdaj je Komisija ocenila postopke za izterjavo, ki jih opravljajo države članice v zvezi z nepravilnostmi, ki so bile v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 595/91 z dne 4. marca 1991 o nepravilnostih in povračilu napačno izplačanih vsot v zvezi s financiranjem skupne kmetijske politike ter o ustanovitvi informacijskega sistema na tem področju in razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 283/72 [6] sporočene pred 1. januarjem 1999 in se nanašajo na zneske v višini nad 500000 EUR, da se v skladu s členom 8(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 odloči o finančnih posledicah navedenih nepravilnosti.
In so doing, the Commission has followed the procedure set out in Article 5 of that Regulation and in Article 8 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section [7].
Pri tem je Komisija uporabila postopek, določen v členu 5 navedene uredbe in členu 8 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1663/95 z dne 7. julija 1995 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 729/70 v zvezi s postopkom za potrditev obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS [7].
The verifications and the bilateral discussions with the Member States have shown that in certain cases the Member States did not act with the necessary promptness and diligence.
Preverjanja in dvostranske razprave z državami članicami so pokazali, da v nekaterih primerih države članice niso ukrepale dovolj hitro in skrbno.
Therefore, the financial consequences of non-recovery should in such cases not be borne by the Community budget.
Zato se finančne posledice neizterjanih zneskov v takšnih primerih ne smejo kriti iz proračuna Skupnosti.
In all other cases the financial consequences of the irregularities examined should be borne by the Community budget.
V vseh ostalih primerih se morajo finančne posledice proučenih nepravilnosti kriti iz proračuna Skupnosti.
Cases notified under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 in which undue payments have been recovered in full or for which it has been found that no undue payment was made should be removed from the list of notifications provided for in Articles 3 and 5 of that Regulation.
Primeri, sporočeni v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 595/91, pri katerih so bila neupravičena plačila v celoti izterjana ali pri katerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da neupravičena plačila niso bila opravljena, se odstranijo s seznama poročil iz členov 3 in 5 navedene uredbe.
The Commission has informed the Member States in a summary report of the amounts to be excluded from the Community financing and of the grounds on which such exclusion should be decided,
Komisija je v zbirnem poročilu obvestila države članice o zneskih, ki se izključijo iz financiranja Skupnosti, in o vzrokih, na podlagi katerih se odloči o takšni izključitvi –
The cases listed in Annex I are hereby cleared and the corresponding amounts charged to the Member State concerned.
Primeri, našteti v Prilogi I, so s tem zaključeni in ustrezni zneski gredo v breme zadevne države članice.
The cases listed in Annex II are hereby cleared and the corresponding amounts charged to the Community budget.
Primeri, našteti v Prilogi II, so s tem zaključeni in ustrezni zneski gredo v breme proračuna Skupnosti.
The cases listed in Annex III are removed from the list of notifications provided for in Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91.
Primeri, našteti v Prilogi III, se odstranijo s seznama poročil iz členov 3 in 5 Uredbe (EGS) št. 595/91.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Portuguese Republic and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Portugalsko republiko ter Združeno kraljestvo Velike Britanije in Severne Irske.
Judgment of 11.10.1990, ECR 1990, p. I-3603.
Sodba z dne 11.10.1990, ECR 1990, str. I-3603.
Judgment of 21.1.1999, ECR 1999, p. I-35.
Sodba z dne 21.1.1999, ECR 1999, str. I-35.
Judgment of 13.11.2001, ECR 2001, p. I-8453.
Sodba z dne 13.11.2001, ECR 2001, str. I-8453.
Points 12 and 13.
Točki 12–13.
Amounts to be charged to the Member States
Zneski, ki gredo v breme držav članic
(budget item 6701)
(Proračunska postavka 6701)
Case
Št. primera
Amount in EUR
znesek v EUR
Amount in GBP
znesek v GBP
Amounts to be charged to the EAGGF Guarantee Fund
Zneski, ki gredo v breme Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS
Case number
Št. primera
Irregularity cases to be removed from the list under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91
Primeri nepravilnosti, ki jih je treba umakniti s seznama v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 595/91
concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system
o tehnični specifikaciji za interoperabilnost v zvezi s podsistemom vodenje-upravljanje in signalizacija vseevropskega železniškega sistema za konvencionalne hitrosti
(notified under document number C(2006) 964)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 964)
Having regard to Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the conventional rail system, and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/16/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. marca 2001 o interoperabilnosti železniškega sistema za konvencionalne hitrosti in zlasti člena 6(1) Direktive,
In accordance with Article 2(c) of Directive 2001/16/EC, the trans-European conventional rail system is subdivided into structural or functional subsystems.
V skladu s členom 2(c) Direktive 2001/16/ES je vseevropski železniški sistem za konvencionalne hitrosti razdeljen na strukturne ali funkcionalne podsisteme.
Each of these subsystems is to be covered by a technical specification for interoperability (TSI).
Vsakega od teh podsistemov mora urejati tehnična specifikacija za interoperabilnost (TSI).
The first step in establishing a TSI is to have a draft TSI drawn up by the European Association for Railway Interoperability (AEIF) which was appointed as the joint representative body.
Prvi korak pri določitvi TSI je, da Evropsko združenje za železniško interoperabilnost (AEIF), ki je bilo imenovano kot skupno predstavniško telo, izdela osnutek TSI.