natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considers that if the premiums collected may prove insufficient to cover all the losses due to defaults, then they are even less likely to be sufficient to cover all the administrative costs as well.
Poleg tega Komisija meni, da če zbrane premije ne bi zadostovale za kritje vse izgub zaradi neplačil obveznosti, takšno premijsko tveganje še toliko bolj verjetno ne bi zadostovalo za kritje vse administrativnih stroškov.
Lastly, the Italian authorities have informed the Commission that the Law has allocated EUR 258228449,54 (LIT 500 billion) for the operation of the Fund, which the State has earmarked in the budget; no return on this capital is provided for.
Italijanski organi so obvestili Komisijo, da je bilo z zakonom dodeljenih 58228449,54 EUR (500 bilijonov LIT), ki jih je država v svojem proračunu določila za delovanje Sklada. Vendar donos kapitala ni predviden.
It follows from the argument set out so far that the premium or the range of premiums proposed by the Italian authorities are not capable of ensuring that the scheme is self-financing and that all administrative costs are covered.
Vsi zgornji elementi dokazujejo, da se premija ali lestvica premij, ki so ju predlagali italijanski organi, ne zdita sposobni zagotoviti samofinanciranja sheme in kritja vseh administrativnih stroškov.
In addition, the terms of the scheme are not based on a realistic assessment of the risks.
Zdi se, da tudi pogoji sheme ne temeljijo na realni oceni tveganj.
A fortiori, therefore, the private investor test is not met.
Zato tudi test zasebnega investitorja ni primeren.
On this basis, the Commission believes that the proposed measure is capable of conferring an economic advantage on the beneficiaries of the Fund.
Na tej podlagi Komisija meni, da je predlagani ukrep sposoben dodeliti gospodarsko prednost upravičencem Sklada.
Use of State resources and selectivity of the measure
Udeležba državnih sredstev in selektivnost ukrepa
It is clear that State resources are to be used, given that the measure is a scheme providing public guarantees and that the financing will be provided by the State budget.
Jasno je, da gre za državna sredstva, glede na to, da je obravnavani ukrep shema, ki zagotavlja državna jamstva, in da bo državni proračun zagotovil finančna sredstva.
State guarantees may constitute a drain on the resources of the State if the State takes a financial risk and forgoes an appropriate premium payable by the beneficiaries.
Državna jamstva lahko dejansko pomenijo odtekanje državnih sredstev, če država prevzame finančno tveganje in se odreče ustrezni premiji, ki bi jo morali plačati upravičenci.
It is likewise evident that the measure is selective, as these State guarantees are to be available only to shipowners who intend to have shipbuilding or conversion work carried out in Italian shipyards (and who meet the criteria set out in the Italian legislation).
Očitno je, da je ukrep selektiven, saj lahko državna jamstva koristijo le lastniki ladij, ki nameravajo izvajati dela gradnje in predelave ladij v italijanskih ladjedelnicah (in ki izpolnjujejo merila, ki jih določa italijanska zakonodaja).
Distortion of competition and effect on intra-Community trade
Izkrivljanje konkurence in vpliv na trgovino znotraj Skupnosti
The economic advantage conferred by the Fund on specific undertakings may, by its very nature, distort competition, as the State guarantees may facilitate access by these undertakings to certain activities otherwise not open to them.
Gospodarska prednost, ki jo Sklad dodeli določenim podjetjem, lahko po svoji naravi izkrivlja konkurenco, glede na to, da lahko državna jamstva tem podjetjem omogočajo določene dejavnosti, ki jih sicer ne bi mogla izvajati.
The granting of the guarantees by the State, without an adequate remuneration on the part of the beneficiaries, may give these undertakings and the Italian shipbuilding industry a competitive advantage over European and non-European competitors who have not got the benefit of similar measures.
Odobritev jamstev države, brez ustreznega plačila upravičencev, lahko tem družbam in italijanskemu ladjedelniškemu sektorju zagotovi konkurenčno prednost v primerjavi z njihovimi evropskimi in neevropskimi konkurenti, ki ne koristijo podobnih ukrepov.
There is ample intra-Community trade within the global shipbuilding market.
V smislu globalnega trga ladjedelniškega sektorja obstaja v Skupnosti obsežna trgovina.
The measure is thus capable of affecting trade between Member States.
Obravnavani ukrep tako lahko vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
In conclusion, as all the criteria of Article 87(1) are met, the proposed measure constitutes State aid within the meaning of the EC Treaty.
Ker so izpolnjeni vsi elementi člena 87(1), predlagani ukrep pomeni državno pomoč v smislu Pogodbe ES.
The conditions under which aid is compatible or may be considered compatible with the common market are set out in Article 87(2) and (3).
Člen 87(2) in (3) določa pogoje, v skladu s katerimi je pomoč združljiva ali se lahko šteje za združljivo s skupnim trgom.
Article 87(3)(e) enables the Council to specify categories of aid that may be considered compatible with the common market by taking a decision by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission.
Člen 87(3)(e) omogoča Svetu, da navede kategorije pomoči, ki bi lahko bile združljive s skupnim trgom, s sprejetjem odločitve s kvalificirano večino, na podlagi predloga Komisije.
At the time of the notification, aid to the shipbuilding sector was regulated by Council Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 of 29 June 1998 establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding [7] (the ‘Shipbuilding Regulation’).
V času obvestila je pomoč ladjedelniškemu sektorju urejala Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1540/98 z dne 29. junija 1998, ki je uvedla nova pravila o pomoči ladjedelništvu [7] („ladjedelniška uredba“).
According to the Shipbuilding Regulation aid could be granted to the industry only under the conditions and for the objectives which the Regulation laid down.
V skladu z ladjedelniško uredbo bi bila pomoč temu sektorju dovoljena samo pod pogoji in za namene, ki so določeni v takšnih pravnih instrumentih.
Operating aid was not permissible for shipbuilding contracts concluded after 31 December 2000.
Tudi operativna pomoč v ladjedelniškem sektorju ni bila dovoljena za ladjedelniške pogodbe, sklenjene po 31.12.2000.
On 1 January 2004 the new Framework on State Aid to Shipbuilding (the ‘Shipbuilding Framework’) [8] entered into force: it confirmed the prohibition of any operating aid within this sector.
januarja 2004 je začel veljati novi okvir o državni pomoči ladjedelništvu („ladjedelniški okvir“) [8], ki je potrdil prepoved operativne pomoči v sektorju.
Consequently, only aid in compliance with the requirements indicated and for the purposes provided for in the Framework could be considered compatible.
Posledično se lahko za združljivo šteje samo pomoč, ki je v skladu z določenimi zahtevami in nameni, določenimi v okviru.
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice [9], unless otherwise specified in transitional transitory rules, notified State aid measures have to be assessed according to the rules in force at the time the decision on their compatibility is adopted.
Glede na sedanjo sodno prakso [9] in v kolikor začasna pravila ne določajo drugače, morajo biti priglašene državne pomoči ocenjene v skladu s pravili, ki veljajo v času sprejema odločitve o njihovi združljivosti.
In the case at issue, therefore, the aid has to be assessed under the Shipbuilding Framework.
V zadevnem primeru je treba pomoč oceniti glede na ladjedelniški okvir.
The decision to initiate proceedings was adopted when the Shipbuilding Regulation was in force, and it was accordingly based on the Shipbuilding Regulation.
Odločitev o začetku postopkov je bila sprejeta v času veljavnosti ladjedelniške uredbe in zato temelji na ladjedelniški uredbi.
But there is no need to initiate the administrative procedure afresh when the relevant provisions of two consecutive legislative acts are not substantially different.
Vendar pa ponovna uvedba upravnih postopkov ni potrebna, če se ustrezne določbe dveh zaporednih pravnih besedil bistveno ne razlikujejo.
This requirement is clearly fulfilled in the present case [10].
Ta zahteva je v zadevnem primeru v celoti izpolnjena [10].
In the Shipbuilding Framework and the Shipbuilding Regulation, aid to shipbuilding includes all aid granted directly or indirectly to shipyards, to shipowners or to third parties which are available as aid for the building or conversion of ships, such as credit facilities, guarantees and tax concessions [11].
Odobrena pomoč v ladjedelniškem okviru in ladjedelniški uredbi neposredno ali posredno vključuje vse oblike pomoči ladjedelnicam, lastnikom ladij ali tretjim osebam, ki so na voljo kot pomoč za gradnjo ali predelavo ladij, kot so krediti, jamstva in davčne ugodnosti [11].
As regards the compatibility of the aid with the common market, the decision to initiate proceedings was based on the fact that the aid was operating aid and as such was incompatible under the Shipbuilding Regulation since 1 January 2001 [12].
Odločitev o začetku postopkov je v zvezi z združljivostjo pomoči temeljila na dejstvu, da je bila takšna pomoč operativna pomoč, ki je od 1. januarja 2001 načeloma nezdružljiva v skladu z ladjedelniško uredbo [12].
The same rule continues to apply under the Shipbuilding Framework, which does not allow the granting of operating aid.
To še vedno velja glede na ladjedelniški okvir, ki ne dovoljuje odobritve operativne pomoči.
This is still the case [14].
To še vedno velja [14].
The initiating decision did not assess the aid in the light of other compatibility provisions of the Shipbuilding Regulation, as it was obvious that the aid was not closure aid, rescue or restructuring aid, innovation aid, aid for research and development or environmental aid.
Ocena pomoči glede drugih določb o združljivosti iz ladjedelniške uredbe ni bila opravljena, ker je bilo očitno, da pomoč ni bila namenjena zaprtju, reševanju in prestrukturiranju, inovacijam, regionalnim naložbam, raziskavam in razvoju, okolju ali mednarodnemu razvoju.
It is likewise obvious that the aid does not aim at favouring these objectives within the meaning of the Shipbuilding Framework either, even though the provisions of the Framework are slightly different.
Jasno je tudi, da pomoč ni namenjena podpiranju teh ciljev, četudi so določbe ladjedelniškega okvira v določenih primerih v zvezi s tem nekoliko drugačne.
Similarly, it is obvious that the aid does not pursue other horizontal objectives now authorised under the Shipbuilding Framework (training, employment, or promotion of SMEs).
Očitno je tudi, da pomoč ni namenjena drugim horizontalnim ciljem (usposabljanje, zaposlovanje, napredovanje MSP), ki so zdaj odobreni v skladu z ladjedelniškim okvirom.
It should also be stressed that the Italian authorities have never argued that the measure should be considered compatible.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da italijanski organi niso nikoli trdili, da je treba zadevni ukrep obravnavati kot združljivo pomoč.
They have consequently never provided any information to the Commission in order to allow it to consider whether the aid qualifies for any of the exemptions from the general prohibition laid down in Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Tako Komisiji niso nikoli zagotovili kakršnih koli informacij, na podlagi katerih bi lahko ugotovila, ali ta pomoč spada v okvir kršitev splošne prepovedi, določenih v členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission accordingly takes the view that none of the exemptions from the prohibition of State aid to the shipbuilding industry is applicable in the present case, and consequently that the measure, which constitutes State aid, is not compatible with the common market.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je Komisija mnenja, da se nobena izmed izjem od prepovedi državne pomoči ladjedelniškemu sektorju ne more uporabiti v zadevnem primeru in zato, ukrep, ki ga je Komisija označila kot državno pomoč, ni združljiv s skupnim trgom.
The Commission concludes that the Fund scheme is a State aid scheme which is incompatible with the common market,
Komisija na podlagi navedenega ugotavlja, da garancijska shema, zagotovljena v skladu s Fondo speciale di garanzia per il credito navale pomeni državno pomoč in je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom –
The State aid for ship financing which Italy is planning to implement on the basis of Article 5 of Law No 261 of 31 July 1997, as amended by Article 1 of Law No 413 of 30 November 1998 and supplemented by the Decree of the Minister for the Treasury, the Budget and Economic Planning dated 14 December 2000, is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo Italija namerava izvajati za financiranje ladij na podlagi člena 5 Zakona št. 261 z dne 31. julija 1997, kakor je dopolnjen s členom 1 Zakona št. 413 z dne 30. novembra 1998 in z uredbo ministra z dne 14. decembra 2000, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may accordingly not be implemented.
Zato se pomoč ne sme izvajati.
Italy shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Italija mora v roku dveh mesecev obvestiti Komisijo o notifikaciji te odločbe in ukrepih, ki jih je izvedla za njeno izpolnitev.
OJ C 145, 21.6.2003, p. 48.
UL C 145, 21.6.2003, str. 48.
Points 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 of the Notice.
Točki 2.1.1 in 2.1.2 Obvestila.
OJ C 62, 11.3.2004, p. 2.
UL C 62, 11.3.2004, str. 2.
It should be pointed out that the market for shipbuilding appears to be global, and the market for finance to shipbuilding appears to be at least pan-European.
Poudariti je treba, da je ladjedelniški trg videti globalen in da je financiranje ladjedelništva videti vsaj panevropsko.
Therefore, important lessons could be learnt from the German case irrespective of the fact that the schemes there assessed did not concern Italy.
Zato se pomembne elemente lahko prevzame iz nemškega primera, ne glede na dejstvo, da se tam ocenjene sheme ne nanašajo na Italijo.
Framework on State Aid to Shipbuilding (2003/C 317/06) (OJ C 317, 30.12.2003, p. 11).
Okvir o državni pomoči ladjedelništvu (2003/C 317/06) v (UL C 317, 30.12.2003, str. 11).
See judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-176/01 Ferriere Nord SpA v Commission of the European Communities [2004] ECR, 18 November 2004, not yet reported, in particular paragraphs 134 to 140.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 18.11.2004 v primeru T-176/01, Ferriere Nord SpA proti Komisiji, zlasti točke 134 do 140.
See also Case T-136/01 Ferriere Nord, paragraphs 74 to 82.
Glej zgoraj navedeni primer T-136/01, točke 74 do 82.
See Article 2(2) of the Shipbuilding Regulation and paragraph 11 of the Shipbuilding Framework.
Glej člen 2(2) ladjedelniške uredbe in točko 11 ladjedelniškega okvira.
See Article 3(1) of the Shipbuilding Regulation.
Glej člen 3(1) ladjedelniške uredbe.
See Article 3(4) of the Shipbuilding Regulation.
Glej člen 3(4) ladjedelniške uredbe.
See paragraph 23 of the Shipbuilding Framework, which refers to the same OECD provisions as the decision initiating proceedings.
Glej točko 23 Okvira za ladjedelništvo, ki se sklicuje na enake OECD določbe, kot so bile navedene v začetni odločbi.
That Article was amended by Law No 413 of 30 November 1998. On 16 May 2001 Italy notified the Commission of the adoption of a decree of the Minister for the Treasury, the Budget and Economic Planning, which supplemented the guarantee scheme, arguing that, with these modifications and additions, the scheme should be considered free of aid.
Italija je 16. maja 2001 obvestila Komisijo o sprejetju izvedbene uredbe, ki je uskladila in spremenila pravila, ki urejajo garancijsko shemo, pri čemer je trdila, da je treba garancijsko shemo z upoštevanjem teh sprememb obravnavati brez pomoči.
The decision to initiate proceedings also considered the possibility of assessing the compatibility of the aid in the light of the OECD rules on credit facilities granted for the building and conversion of vessels [13].
Odločitev o začetku postopkov je podrobneje ocenila združljivost pomoči v zvezi z določbami, povezanimi z odobritvijo kreditov tretjim osebam za gradnjo plovil [13].
It stated that although the OECD Arrangement and Sector Understanding made provision for guarantees, the provisions of the Arrangement in relation to minimum premium benchmarks did not apply until such time as they had been reexamined by the parties to the Sector Understanding.
Navedla je, da se dogovori v zvezi z merili za najmanjšo premijo ne bodo uporabljali za ladje v skladu s sporazumom sektorja, čeprav obstajajo pravila glede jamstev v okviru dogovora OECD in sporazuma sektorja.
of 4 September 2006
z dne 4. septembra 2006
establishing the classes of external fire performance for certain construction products as regards double skin metal faced sandwich panels for roofs
o določitvi razredov požarne odpornosti pri požarih z zunanje strani za nekatere gradbene proizvode glede dvoslojnih kovinskih sendvič plošč za strehe
(notified under document number C(2006) 3883)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3883)
Directive 89/106/EEC envisages that in order to take account of different levels of protection for the construction works at national, regional or local levels, it may be necessary to establish in interpretative documents classes corresponding to the performance of products in respect of each essential requirement.
Direktiva 89/106/EGS predvideva, da se lahko zaradi upoštevanja različnih ravni zaščite gradbenih objektov na nacionalnih, regionalnih ali lokalnih ravneh v razlagalnih dokumentih za vsako bistveno zahtevo določijo razredi, ki ustrezajo značilnostim proizvodov.
Those documents have been published as the ‘Communication of the Commission with regard to the interpretative documents of Directive 89/106/EEC [2]’.
Ti dokumenti so bili objavljeni kot „Obvestilo Komisije v zvezi z razlagalnimi dokumenti Direktive 89/106/EGS [2]“.
The level of that limitation may be expressed only in terms of the different levels of reaction-to-fire performance of the products in their end-use application.
Raven te omejitve se lahko izrazi samo z različnimi ravnmi požarne odpornosti proizvodov pri njihovi končni uporabi.
By way of a harmonised solution, a system of classes was adopted in Commission Decision 2001/671/EC of 21 August 2001 implementing Council Directive 89/106/EEC as regards the classification of the external fire performance of roofs and roof coverings [3].
Kot usklajena rešitev je bil v Odločbi Komisije 2001/671/ES z dne 21. avgusta 2001 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 89/106/EGS v zvezi z razvrstitvijo požarne odpornosti streh in strešnih kritin pri požarih z zunanje strani sprejet sistem razredov [3].
In the case of certain construction products, it is necessary to use the classification established in Decision 2001/671/EC.
V primeru nekaterih gradbenih proizvodov je treba uporabiti razvrstitev, določeno v Odločbi 2001/671/ES.
The external fire performance of some roofs and roof coverings, within the classification provided for in Decision 2001/671/EC, is well established and sufficiently well known to fire regulators in Member States, so that they do not require testing for this particular performance characteristic.
Požarna odpornost nekaterih streh in strešnih kritin pri požarih z zunanje strani v okviru razvrstitve, opredeljene v Odločbi 2001/671/ES, je dobro uveljavljena in dovolj poznana pri organih, ki so v državah članicah pristojni za protipožarno zaščito, tako da ne zahtevajo preskušanja te posebne značilnosti.
The construction products which satisfy all the requirements of the external fire performance characteristics without need for further testing are set out in the Annex.
Gradbeni proizvodi, ki izpolnjujejo vse zahteve glede značilnosti „obnašanje pri požarih z zunanje strani“ brez potrebe po nadaljnjih preskusih, so navedeni v Prilogi.
The specific classes to be applied to different construction products, within the external fire performance classification adopted in Decision 2001/671/EC, are set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Posebni razredi, ki jih je treba uporabiti za različne gradbene proizvode v okviru razvrstitve požarne odpornosti pri požarih z zunanje strani, ki je bila sprejeta z Odločbo 2001/671/ES, so navedeni v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 4 September 2006.
V Bruslju, 4. septembra 2006
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
The table set out in this Annex lists the construction products which satisfy all of the requirements for the external fire performance without need for testing.
Tabela v tej prilogi navaja gradbene proizvode, ki izpolnjujejo vse zahteve glede značilnosti „obnašanje pri požarih z zunanje strani“ brez potrebe po preskusih.
CLASSES OF EXTERNAL FIRE PERFORMANCE FOR DOUBLE SKIN METAL FACED SANDWICH PANELS FOR ROOFS
RAZREDI POŽARNE ODPORNOSTI PRI POŽARIH Z ZUNANJE STRANI ZA DVOSLOJNE KOVINSKE SENDVIČ PLOŠČE ZA STREHE
Symbols used: PUR = polyurethane; MW = mineral wool; PVC = polyvinyl chloride; PCS = gross calorific potential.
Uporabljeni simboli: PUR = poliuretan; MW = mineralna volna; PVC = polivinil klorid; PCS = toplotni potencial.
Product detail
Podrobni podatki o proizvodu
Core material with minimum density
Jedro z najmanjšo gostoto
Class [2]
Razred [2]
Steel, stainless steel or aluminium faced sandwich panels for roofs
Jeklo, nerjavno jeklo ali aluminijaste sendvič plošče za strehe
In accordance with EN 14509 [1]
V skladu z EN 14509 [1]
MW (lamellas) 80 kg/m3
MW (lamele) 80 kg/m3
MW (full width boards) 110 kg/m3
MW (plošče s polno širino) 110 kg/m3
Panels with a profiled external metal facing incorporating:minimum thickness 0,4 mm for facings of steel and stainless steel;minimum thickness 0,9 mm for facings of aluminium;at each longitudinal joint between two panels an overlap of the external metal facing extending across the crown and a minimum 15 mm down the opposite face of the crown, or a metal cover cap completely covering the joint crown, or a raised standing metal seam along the joint;at each transverse joint between two panels an overlap of the external metal facing of at least 75 mm;a protective weather coating comprising a liquid applied PVC paint of maximum nominal dry film thickness 0,200 mm, a PCS of not greater than 8,0 MJ/m2 and a maximum dry mass of 300 g/m2;or any thin paint coating less than the above;minimum reaction to fire classification of D-s3, d0 without edge protection in accordance with EN 13501-1.
Plošče s profilirano zunanjo kovinsko oblogo:najmanjša debelina 0,4 mm za obloge iz jekla in nerjavnega jekla;najmanjša debelina 0,9 mm za obloge iz aluminija;na vsakem vzdolžnem spoju med dvema ploščama prekritje zunanje obloge, ki sega čez oglavje in najmanj 15 mm navzdol ob nasprotni strani oglavja ali kovinski vrhnji pokrov, ki popolnoma prekriva spojno oglavje ali dvignjen stoječi kovinski pregib vzdolž spoja;na vsakem prečnem spoju med dvema ploščama prekritje zunanje obloge najmanj 75 mm;zaščitna vremenska prevleka vsebuje premaz PVC, ki se nanaša v tekoči obliki, z nominalno debelino suhega nanosa največ 0,200 mm, s PCS, ki ni večji od 8,0 MJ/m2 in s suho maso največ 300 g/m2ali kakršenkoli tanjši premaz z nižjimi vrednostmi od zgornjega;najnižji razred požarne odpornosti D-s3, d0 brez zaščite robov v skladu z EN 13501-1.
Class as provided for in the table of the Annex to Decision 2001/671/EC.
Razred, kakor je opredeljen v tabeli Priloge k Odločbi 2001/671/ES.
BROOF (t1)
Bstreha (t1)
BROOF (t2)
Bstreha (t2)
BROOF (t3)
Bstreha (t3)
of 5 September 2006
z dne 5. septembra 2006
on emergency measures regarding the non-authorised genetically modified organism ‘LL RICE 601’ in rice products
o izrednih ukrepih glede nedovoljenega gensko spremenjenega organizma „LL RICE 601“ v riževih proizvodih
(notified under document number C(2006) 3932)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3932)