natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
to Commission Regulation of 4 February 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 4. februarja 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 204/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 204/2005
determining to what extent import right applications submitted during the month of January 2005 for live bovine animals weighing between 80 and 300 kg as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004 may be accepted
o določitvi, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko sprejmejo zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženi v mesecu januarju 2005 za živo govedo, ki je težko od 80 do 300 kg, v okviru tarifne kvote, predvidene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1204/2004
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004 of 29 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for live bovine animals weighing between 80 and 300 kg and originating in Bulgaria or Romania (1 July to 30 June 2005) [2], and in particular Articles 1(4) and 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1204/2004 z dne 29. junija 2004 o odprtju in upravljanju tarifne kvote za živo govedo s težo od 80 do 300 kilogramov s poreklom iz Bolgarije ali Romunije (od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005) [2], in zlasti člena 1(4) in člena 4 Uredbe,
Article 1(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004 lays down the number of head of live bovine animals weighing between 80 and 300 kg falling within CN code 01029005 and originating in Bulgaria or Romania which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 January to 31 March 2005.
Člen 1(3)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1204/2004 določa število glav živega goveda, ki je težko od 80 do 300 kilogramov, s poreklom iz Bolgarije ali Romunije, ki se lahko uvozi pod posebnimi pogoji v obdobju od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. marca 2005.
The quantities in respect of which licences may be applied for from 1 April 2005 should be fixed within the scope of the total quantity of 153000 animals, conforming to Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004,
Treba je določiti količine, za katere je mogoče zaprositi uvozna dovoljenja od 1. aprila 2005, v okviru skupne količine 153000 glav, v skladu s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1204/2004 –
All applications for import certificates made in the month of January 2005 pursuant to Article 3(3), second subparagraph, third indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004 are hereby met in full.
Vsakemu zahtevku za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženemu v mesecu januarju 2005, v skladu s členom 3(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1204/2004, se ugodi v celoti.
The number of animals referred to in Article 1(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1204/2004 is 66495.
Količine, za obdobje iz člena 1(3)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1204/2004 znašajo 66495 glav.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 205/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 205/2005
supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Valdemone — [PDO], Queso Ibores — [PDO], Pera de Jumilla — [PDO], Aceite de Terra Alta or Oli de Terra Alta — [PDO], Sierra de Cádiz — [PDO], Requeijão Serra da Estrela — [PDO], Zafferano dell’Aquila — [PDO], Zafferano di San Gimignano — [PDO], Mantecadas de Astorga — [PGI] and Pan de Cea — [PGI])
o dopolnitvi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2400/96 o vnosu nekaterih imen v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih oznak“ (Valdemone – [ZOP], Queso Ibores – [ZOP], Pera de Jumilla – [ZOP], Aceite de Terra Alta ali Oli de Terra Alta – [ZOP], Sierra de Cádiz – [ZOP], Requeijão Serra da Estrela – [ZOP], Zafferano dell’Aquila – [ZOP], Zafferano di San Gimignano – [ZOP], Mantecadas de Astorga – [ZGO] in Pan de Cea – [ZGO])
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 6(3) and (4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 z dne 14. julija 1992 o zaščiti geografskih oznak in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [1] in zlasti člena 6(3) in (4) Uredbe, prva alinea,
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the Italian application to register the three names ‘Valdemone’, ‘Zafferano dell’Aquila’ and ‘Zafferano di San Gimignano’, the Spanish application to register the six names ‘Queso Ibores’, ‘Pera de Jumilla’, ‘Aceite de Terra Alta’ or ‘Oli de Terra Alta’, ‘Sierra de Cádiz’, ‘Mantecadas de Astorga’ and ‘Pan de Cea’ and the Portuguese application to register the name ‘Requijão Serra da Estrela’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92 so bili zahtevek Italije za vnos treh poimenovanj „Valdemone“, „Zafferano dell’Aquila“ in „Zafferano di San Gimignano“; zahtevek Španije za vnos šestih poimenovanj „Queso Ibores“, „Pera de Jumilla“, „Aceite de Terra Alta“ ali „Oli de Terra Alta“, „Sierra de Cádiz“, „Mantecadas de Astorga“ in „Pan de Cea“ ter zahtevek Portugalske za vnos poimenovanja „Requeijão Serra da Estrela“ objavljeni v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije [2].
As no declaration of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 has been forwarded to the Commission, these designations can thus be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’,
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora v smislu člena 7 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92, je treba ta poimenovanja vpisati v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih oznak“ –
The names in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 [3].Article 2
Priloga Uredbe (ES) št. 2400/96 [3] se dopolni s poimenovanji iz Priloge k tej uredbi.Člen 2
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1215/2004 (OJ L 232, 1.7.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1215/2004 (UL L 232, 1.7.2004, str. 1).
OJ C 58, 6.3.2004, p. 10 (Valdemone).OJ C 58, 6.3.2004, p. 14 (Queso Ibores).OJ C 58, 6.3.2004, p. 17 (Pera de Jumilla).OJ C 61, 10.3.2004, p. 22 (Aceite de Terra Alta, also known as Oli de Terra Alta).OJ C 88, 8.4.2004, p. 6 (Sierra de Cádiz).OJ C 88, 8.4.2004, p. 10 (Requijão Serra da Estrela).OJ C 93, 17.4.2004, p. 23 (Zafferano dell’Aquila).OJ C 93, 17.4.2004, p. 27 (Zafferano di San Gimignano).OJ C 98, 23.4.2004, p. 24 (Mantecadas de Astorga).OJ C 98, 23.4.2004, p. 29 (Pan de Cea).
UL C 58, 6.3.2004, str. 10 (Valdemone).UL C 58, 6.3.2004, str. 14 (Queso Ibores).UL C 58, 6.3.2004, str. 17 (Pera de Jumilla).UL C 61, 10.3.2004, str. 22 (Aceite de Terra Alta ali Oli de Terra Alta).UL C 88, 8.4.2004, str. 6 (Sierra de Cádiz).UL C 88, 8.4.2004, str. 10 (Requeijăo Serra da Estrela).UL C 93, 17.4.2004, str. 23 (Zafferano dell’Aquila).UL C 93, 17.4.2004, str. 27 (Zafferano di San Gimignano).UL C 98, 23.4.2004, str. 24 (Mantecadas de Astorga).UL C 98, 23.4.2004, str. 29 (Pan de Cea).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1898/2004 (OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, p. 66).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1898/2004 (UL L 328, 30.10.2004, str. 66).
PRODUCTS LISTED IN ANNEX I TO THE TREATY, INTENDED FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION
PROIZVODI IZ PRILOGE I POGODBE, NAMENJENI ZA PREHRANO LJUDI
Fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)
Maščobe (maslo, margarina, olja itd.)
Valdemone (PDO)
Valdemone (ZOP)
Aceite de Terra Alta or Oli de Terra Alta (PDO)
Aceite de Terra Alta ali Oli de Terra Alta (ZOP)
Sierra de Cádiz (PDO)
Sierra de Cádiz (ZOP)
Queso Ibores (PDO)
Queso Ibores (ZOP)
Pera de Jumilla (PDO)
Pera de Jumilla (ZOP)
Other animal products (eggs, honey, various milk products except butter, etc)
Drugi proizvodi živalskega porekla (jajca, med, različni mlečni proizvodi razen masla itd.)
Requeijão Serra da Estrela (PDO)
Requeijão Serra da Estrela (ZOP)
Other Annex I products (spices, etc.)
Drugi proizvodi iz Priloge I – Začimbe
Zafferano dell’Aquila (PDO)
Zafferano dell’Aquila (ZOP)
Zafferano di San Gimignano (PDO)
Zafferano di San Gimignano (ZOP)
FOODSTUFFS REFERRED TO IN ANNEX I TO REGULATION (EEC) NO 2081/92
ŽIVILA IZ PRILOGE UREDBE (EGS) st. 2081/92
Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker's wares
Pekovski izdelki, slaščičarski izdelki ali piškoti
Pan de Cea (PGI)
Pan de Cea (ZGO)
Mantecadas de Astorga (PGI)
Mantecadas de Astorga (ZGO).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 206/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 206/2005
imposing definitive safeguard measures against imports of farmed salmon
o uvedbi dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepov proti uvozu gojenega lososa
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 of 22 December 1994 on common rules for imports and repealing Regulation (EC) No 518/94 [1], as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2474/2000 [2], and in particular Article 16 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3285/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 518/94 [1], kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2474/2000 [2], in zlasti člena 16 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 519/94 of 7 March 1994 on common rules for imports from certain third countries and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1765/82, (EEC) No 1766/82 and (EEC) No 3420/83 [3], as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 427/2003 [4], and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 519/94 z dne 7. marca 1994 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz iz nekaterih tretjih držav in o razveljavitvi Uredb (EGS) št. 1765/82, (EGS) št. 1766/82 in (EGS) 3420/83 [3], kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 427/2003 [4], in zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
After consultations within the Advisory Committee established under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 and of Regulation (EC) No 519/94 respectively,
po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, ustanovljenim v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 3285/94 in Uredbe (ES) št. 519/94,
On 6 February 2004, Ireland and the United Kingdom informed the Commission that trends in imports of farmed Atlantic salmon appeared to call for safeguard measures under Regulations (EC) No 3285/94 and 519/94; submitted information containing the evidence available as determined on the basis of Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 and Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 519/94; and requested the Commission to take safeguard measures under those instruments.
Dne 6. februarja 2004 sta Irska in Združeno kraljestvo Komisijo obvestili o trendu pri uvozu gojenega atlantskega lososa, ki zahteva zaščitne ukrepe v okviru Uredb (ES) št. 3258/94 in 519/94; poslane informacije so vsebovale razpoložljive dokaze, določene na podlagi člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 3285/94 in člena 8 Uredbe (ES) 519/94; državi sta od Komisije zahtevali, naj v okviru teh pravnih aktov uvede dodatne zaščitne ukrepe.
Ireland and the United Kingdom provided evidence that imports into the European Community of farmed Atlantic salmon are increasing rapidly both in absolute terms, and relative to Community production and consumption.
Irska in Združeno kraljestvo sta predložili dokaze, da se uvoz gojenega atlantskega lososa v Evropsko skupnost hitro povečuje tako absolutno kot v razmerju s proizvodnjo in potrošnjo na trgu Skupnosti.
They alleged that the increase in the volume of imports of farmed Atlantic salmon has, among other consequences, had a negative impact on the prices of like or directly competitive products in the Community, and on the market share held by the Community producers, resulting in damage to the Community producers.
Državi predvidevata, da je imelo povečanje uvoza gojenega atlantskega lososa med drugimi posledicami tudi negativen vpliv na cene podobnih ali neposredno konkurenčnih proizvodproizvodov v Skupnosti in na tržni delež proizvajalcev Skupnosti, kar škodi proizvajalcem Skupnosti.
Ireland and the United Kingdom further advised that, based on the information submitted by the Community producers, any delay in the adoption of safeguard measures by the European Community would cause damage which it would be difficult to repair, and that measures should therefore be adopted as a matter of urgency.
Irska in Združeno kraljestvo sta nadalje svetovali, na osnovi informacij, ki so jih posredovali proizvajalci Skupnosti, da bi kakršna koli zamuda pri uvajanju zaščitnih ukrepov povzročila težko popravljivo škodo in da je treba te ukrepe sprejeti takoj.
The Commission informed all Member States of the situation and consulted with them on the terms and conditions of imports, import trends and the evidence as to serious injury, and the various aspects of the economic and commercial situation with regard to the Community product in question.
Komisija je vse države članice obvestila o položaju ter se z njimi dogovorila o pogojih uvoza, gibanju uvoza in dokazilih o resni škodi ter različnih vidikih gospodarskega in trgovskega položaja v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi Skupnosti.
On 6 March 2004, the Commission initiated an investigation relating to serious injury or threat thereof to the Community producers of the product like or directly competitive with the imported product, which has been defined as farmed salmon, whether or not filleted, fresh, chilled or frozen (‘the product concerned’) [5] as explained below.
Dne 6. marca 2004 je Komisija začela s preiskovanjem resne škode ali grožnje o škodi, ki bi utegnila ogroziti proizvajalce Skupnosti, ki proizvajajo podoben ali neposredno konkurenčen proizvod uvoženemu proizvodu, ki je določen kot gojeni losos, predelan v filete, svež, ohlajen, zamrznjen („zadevni proizvod“) [5], kot je razloženo spodaj.
The investigation period (IP) is 2003, and the period under examination in the investigation is from the beginning of 2000 to the end of 2003.
Obdobje preiskave (OP) je leto 2003, v preiskavi pa je celotno obdobje od začetka leta 2000 do konca leta 2003.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers and importers as well as their representative associations known to be concerned, the representatives of exporting countries and the Community producers of the investigation.
Komisija je o preiskavi uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike in uvoznike, njihova predstavniška združenja, ki jih to zadeva in tudi predstavnike držav izvoznic ter proizvajalce Skupnosti.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all these parties, to representative associations of salmon farmers in the Community, and to those parties who made themselves known within the time limits set in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je vsem tem strankam, pa tudi predstavniškim združenjem gojiteljev lososov v Skupnosti ter vsem strankam, ki so se v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, javile, poslala vprašalnike.
Pursuant to Articles 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 519/94 and 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 the Commission also gave parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
V skladu s členom 5 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 519/94 in členom 6 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3285/94 je Komisija neposredno vpletenim strankam tudi dala priložnost, da podajo svoja mnenja v pisni obliki in da zahtevajo zaslišanje.
On 13 August 2004, the Commission imposed provisional safeguard measures.
Dne 13. avgusta 2004 je Komisija uvedla začasne zaščitne ukrepe.
These were referred to the Council under Articles 15(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 519/94 and 16(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 and subsequently lapsed on 6 December 2004.
Ti so bili Svetu predloženi skladno s členom 15(5) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 519/94 in členom 16(7) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3285/94 in so posledično prenehali veljati 6. decembra 2004.
Following the publication of the provisional measures, the Commission continued its investigation with a view to reaching definitive findings.
Po objavi začasnih ukrepov je Komisija nadaljevala s svojo preiskavo, da določi dokončne ugotovitve.
Certain governments, certain exporting producers and their representative associations, the Community producers, suppliers, processors and importers and their representative associations submitted comments in writing.
Nekatere vlade, proizvajalci izvozniki in predstavniška združenja, proizvajalci Skupnosti, dobavitelji, predelovalci in uvozniki ter njihova predstavniška združenja so posredovala pripombe v pisni obliki.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and taken into account in reaching the definitive findings.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih posredovale stranke, so bile obravnavane in upoštevane pri določanju dokončnih ugotovitev.
All the information which was deemed necessary for the purpose of a final determination was sought and verified.
Vse informacije, ki so nujno potrebne za dokončno odločitev, so bile poiskane in preverjene.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of eight Community producers.
Preverjanja so potekala na lokacijah osmih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
All cooperating parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose definitive safeguard measures and the form of the proposed measures.
Vse sodelujoče stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in mnenjih, na podlagi katerih se nameravajo uvesti dokončni zaščitni ukrepi in o obliki predlaganih ukrepov.
They were granted the opportunity to submit comments and these were considered, and, where deemed appropriate, taken into account in the definitive findings.
Vsem strankam je bilo omogočeno, da predložijo pripombe, ki so bile pregledane in upoštevane pri sestavi dokončnih ugotovitev.
Marine Harvest Ireland, County Donegal, Ireland.
Marine Harvest Ireland, County Donegal, Irska
Importers/Processors
Uvozniki/pridelovalci
Vensy Espana SA, Malaga, Spain.
Vensy Espana SA, Malaga, Španija.
Moulin de la Marche, Chateaulin, France
Moulin de la Marche, Chateaulin, Francija.
Group Labeyrie, St-Vincent-De-Tyrosse, France.
Group Labeyrie, St-Vincent-De-Tyrosse, Francija.
Faeroe Seafood Prime, Tórshavn, Faeroe Islands.
Faeroe Seafood Prime, Tórshavn, Ferski otoki.
Landshandilin P/F, Tórshavn, Faroe Island.
Landshandilin P/F, Tórshavn, Ferski otoki.
Viking Seafood P/F, Strendur, Faroe Island.
Viking Seafood P/F, Strendur, Ferski otoki.
Salmon Sp/f, Faeroe Island.
Salmon Sp/f, Ferski otoki.
PRG Export Limited, Gota, Faeroe Island.
PRG Export Limited, Gota, Ferski otoki.
P/F Vestsalmon, Kollafjørdur, Faeroe Islands.
P/F Vestsalmon, Kollafjřrdur, Ferski otoki.
Nordlaks Oppdrett AS Stokmarkers, Norway.
Nordlaks Oppdrett AS Stokmarkers, Norveška.
Seafarm Invest AS Lovund, Norway.
Seafarm Invest AS Lovund, Norveška.
The product in respect of which the Commission was informed that trends in imports appear to call for safeguard measures is farmed Atlantic salmon, whether or not filleted, fresh, chilled or frozen.
Zadevni proizvod, glede katerega je bila Komisija obveščena o gibanju uvoza in ki zahteva zaščitne ukrepe, je gojeni atlantski losos, obdelan ali ne na naslednji način: predelan v filete, svež, ohlajen ali zamrznjen.
However, it is considered that the product concerned should be all farmed salmon.
Vendar pa se razume, da bi morali biti vsi zadevni proizvodi gojen losos.
To restrict the product concerned to farmed Atlantic salmon would be to define the product concerned too narrowly.
Omejitev zadevnega proizvoda na gojenega atlantskega lososa pomeni preozko določanje proizvoda.
Based on the physical characteristics of different species of salmon (size, shape, taste etc), the production process, and the substitutability of all types of farmed salmon from the perspective of the consumer, it is considered that all farmed salmon is a single product.
Na podlagi fizičnih značilnosti različnih vrst lososa (velikost, oblike, okus idr.), postopkov predelave ter zamenljivosti vseh vrst gojenega lososa so z vidika potrošnika vsi gojeni lososi en proizvod.
Similarly, whilst farmed salmon is sold in different preparations (whole fish gutted, whole fish head-off and gutted, fillets), these different preparations all serve the same end use and are readily capable of being substituted.
Ker se gojeni losos prodaja različno pripravljen (brez drobovja, brez drobovja in glave, predelan v filete), služi ta različna priprava enaki končni porabi in se lahko nadomesti.
Some parties argued that frozen salmon is a different product to fresh salmon and should not be considered as part of the product concerned.
Nekatere stranke so ugovarjale, da je zamrznjeni losos drugačen proizvod kot sveži losos in da se ga ne sme obravnavati kot del zadevnega proizvoda.
One party noted that it is subject to a different classification for tariff purposes and claimed that it is intended for, and preferred by, industrial food processors and smokers, whilst consumers prefer fresh salmon.
Ena stranka je opozorila, da je predmet različnih razvrstitev carinskih tarif in trdila, da ga imajo raje predelovalci industrijske in prekajene hrane in je njim tudi namenjen, medtem ko imajo potrošniki raje sveži losos.
It was also argued that the infrastructure required by processors is different as between fresh and frozen salmon.
Dokazovalo se je tudi, da se infrastruktura, ki jo zahtevajo predelovalci, razlikuje med svežim in zamrznjenim lososom.
It was also claimed that there were entirely separate markets for fresh and frozen salmon indicated by a lack of correlation between fresh and frozen salmon prices and specific instances of retailers, processors and consumer profiles which required one preparation but not the other were provided.
Trdilo se je tudi, da sta obstajala popolnoma ločena trga za svež in zamrznjen losos, nakazana s pomanjkanjem povezave med cenami svežega in zamrznjenega lososa in posebnimi primeri prodajalcev na drobno, predelovalcev in profilov potrošnikov, ki so zahtevali en postopek, drugi pa niso bili preskrbljeni.
One party claimed that the normal presentations for frozen salmon (e.g. whole fish, fillet, etc.) were different to those for fresh salmon.
Ena stranka je trdila, da so bile običajne predelave zamrznjenega lososa (npr. cele ribe, fileti itd.) drugačne od tistih za svež losos.
However, these claims were found to be unsubstantiated.
Vendar pa so bili ti ugovori zavrnjeni kot neutemeljeni.
The existence of different classifications for tariff purposes is a single factor amongst others to be considered and is not in itself determinative.
Obstoj različnih razvrstitev carinskih tarif je edini dejavnik med drugimi, ki ga je treba upoštevati in ni sam po sebi odločujoč.
Processors use both fresh and frozen farmed salmon.
Predelovalci uporabljajo tako sveže kot zamrznjene gojene losose.
Both fresh and frozen preparations are commonly sold at retail level and commonly at the same outlets (though some outlets only sell either fresh or frozen salmon) even if there is evidence of a small price differential.
Tako sveži kot zamrznjeni lososi se običajno prodajajo na drobno in običajno v istih trgovinah (čeprav nekatere trgovine prodajajo samo sveže ali samo zamrznjene losose), četudi obstajajo dokazila o majhni razliki v ceni.
Both are available in different presentations and directly consumed by consumers.
Obe vrsti sta na voljo v različnih predelavah in za neposredno porabo potrošnikov.
Although some consumers may prefer to purchase the product in its fresh/chilled state and other in its frozen state, and some preparations are perceived to be of higher quality than others, these preferences and perceptions are not significant.
Čeprav nekateri potrošniki raje kupijo proizvod v sveži/ohlajeni obliki in drugi v zamrznjeni obliki in se nekatere priprave dojemajo kot bolj kakovostne od drugih, te prednosti in zaznavanja niso pomembna.
Both preparations serve the same end use and compete in the same market.
Oba postopka služita enaki končni uporabi in tekmujeta na istem trgu.
One party claimed that there is no cross-elasticity of demand between fresh and frozen salmon, and referred to the findings in Council Regulation (EC) No 930/2003 in support of this proposition.
Ena stran je trdila, da ne obstaja navzkrižna elastičnost povpraševanja med svežim in zamrznjenim lososom, in se v podporo temu predlogu sklicevala na ugotovitve Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 930/2003.