natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Within that overrun, Cyprus has overrun its threshold.
V okviru te prekoračitve je Ciper prekoračil svoj prag.
The amounts of aid for mandarins, clementines and satsumas indicated in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 2202/96 for the 2004/05 marketing year should therefore be reduced by 17,83 % in Cyprus.
Zato je treba zneske pomoči za mandarine, klementine in mandarine satsuma iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 2202/96 za tržno leto 2004/2005 za Ciper znižati za 17,83 %.
Producers in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia did not submit aid applications for citrus fruits for processing in respect of the 2004/05 marketing year.
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 proizvajalci Češke, Estonije, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške niso predložili nobenega zahtevka za pomoč glede agrumov za predelavo.
No additional amount for that marketing year should therefore be paid in those Member States,
Zato za navedeno tržno leto v teh državah članicah ni treba plačati dodatnega zneska –
Where Cyprus is concerned, and for the 2004/05 marketing year, the additional amounts of aid to be granted under Regulation (EC) No 2202/96 for lemons, grapefruit, pomelos, oranges and small citrus fruits delivered for processing shall be as indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 so za Ciper dodatni zneski pomoči, dodeljene v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2202/96 za limone, grenivke, pomele, pomaranče in male agrume za predelavo, navedeni v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 2112/2004 (OJ L 366, 11.12.2004, p. 8).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2112/2004 (UL L 366, 11.12.2004, str. 8).
Grapefruit and pomelos
Grenivke in pomeli
Satsumas
Mandarine satsuma
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2123/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2123/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1555/96 as regards the trigger levels for additional duties on pears, lemons, apples and courgettes
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1555/96, o količinah za dodatne uvozne dajatve za hruške, limone, jabolka in bučke
For the purposes of Article 5(4) of the Agreement on Agriculture [4] concluded during the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and in the light of the latest data available for 2002, 2003 and 2004, the trigger levels for additional duties on pears, lemons, apples and courgettes should be adjusted.
V členu 5(4) Sporazuma o kmetijstvu [4], sklenjenega med urugvajskim krogom večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj, in glede na najnovejše razpoložljive podatke za 2002, 2003 in 2004 je treba spremeniti sprožitvene ravni za dodatne carinske dajatve za. hruške, limone, jabolka in bučke.
Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2003 (OJ L 7, 11.1.2003, p. 64).
Uredba, kakor je nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 47/2003, (UL L 7, 11.1.2003, str. 64).
Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1796/2005 (OJ L 288, 29.10.2005, p. 42).
Uredba, kakor je nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1796/2005, (UL L 288, 29.10.2005, str. 42).
OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.
UL L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1.
Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 883/2005 (OJ L 148, 11.6.2005, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 883/2005, (UL L 148, 11.6.2005, str. 5).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2124/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št 2124/2005
laying down derogations from Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 as regards products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty exported to third countries other than Romania
o odstopanjih od Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 v zvezi s proizvodi kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, ki se izvažajo v tretje države razen Romunije
Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 of 30 June 2005 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 as regards the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds [2] provides that Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products [3] shall apply as regards exports of products in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty.
Člen 4 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1043/2005 z dne 30. junija 2005 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93 glede sistema dodeljevanja izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in merilih za določanje višine teh nadomestil [2] določa, da se Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 800/1999 z dne 15. aprila 1999 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [3] uporablja v zvezi z izvozom proizvodov v obliki blaga, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi.
Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, provides that entitlement to the export refund is acquired on importation into a specific third country when a differentiated refund applies for that third country.
Člen 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 določa, da se pravico do izvoznega nadomestila pridobi pri uvozu v določeno tretjo državo, kadar se za to tretjo državo uporablja diferencirano nadomestilo.
Articles 14, 15 and 16 of that Regulation lay down the conditions for the payment of the differentiated refund, in particular the documents to be supplied as proof of the goods' arrival at destination.
Členi 14, 15 in 16 navedene uredbe določajo pogoje za plačilo diferenciranega nadomestila, zlasti dokumente, ki jih je treba predložiti kot dokazilo o prispetju blaga v namembni kraj.
In the case of a differentiated refund, Article 18(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 provides that part of the refund, calculated using the lowest refund rate, is paid on application by the exporter once proof is furnished that the product has left the customs territory of the Community.
Člen 18(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 določa, da se v primeru diferenciranega nadomestila del nadomestila, izračunan po najnižji stopnji nadomestila, izplača na podlagi zahtevka izvoznika, ko je predloženo dokazilo, da je proizvod zapustil carinsko območje Skupnosti.
EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 of 5 July 2005 concerning the improvement of the trade arrangements for processed agricultural products provided in Protocol 3 of the Europe Agreement [4] provides for the abolition of refunds on processed agricultural products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty when exported to Romania, from 1 December 2005.
Sklep Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija z dne 5. julija 2005 o izboljšavi trgovinskih režimov za predelane kmetijske proizvode iz Protokola 3 Evropskega sporazuma [4] predvideva odpravo nadomestil za predelane kmetijske proizvode, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, kadar se izvažajo v Romunijo, s 1 decembrom 2005.
Romania has undertaken to grant the preferential import arrangements to goods imported into its territory only if the goods concerned are accompanied by documents stating that they are not eligible for payment of export refunds.
Romunija se je zavezala, da bo za blago, uvoženo na njeno ozemlje, dodelila preferencialne uvozne režime, samo če je zadevno blago opremljeno z dokumentacijo, ki navaja, da ni upravičeno do plačila izvoznih nadomestil.
In the light of those arrangements, as a transitory measure in view of the possible accession of Romania to the European Union and in order to avoid the imposition of unnecessary costs on operators in their commercial trade with other third countries, it is appropriate to derogate from Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 in so far as it requires proof of import in the case of differentiated refunds.
Z vidika teh režimov je primerno, da se kot prehodni ukrep zaradi možnega pristopa Romunije k Evropski uniji in da bi se izognili nepotrebnim stroškom za izvajalce pri trgovanju s tretjimi državami, določi odstopanje od Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999, kolikor slednja v primeru diferenciranih nadomestil zahteva dokazilo o uvozu.
Since the measures laid down in EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 will apply as from 1 December 2005 this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication.
Ker se bodo ukrepi, določeni v Sklepu Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija, uporabljali od 1. decembra 2005, mora ta uredba začeti veljati dan po objavi.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee on horizontal questions concerning trade in processed agricultural products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za horizontalna vprašanja v zvezi s trgovino s predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi –
By way of derogation from Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, where the differentiation of the refund is the result solely of a refund not having been fixed for Romania proof that the customs import formalities have been completed shall not be a condition for payment of the refund in respect of all goods listed in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005, which are covered by EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005.
Z odstopanjem od člena 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 kadar je diferenciranje nadomestila rezultat tega, da nadomestilo ni bilo določeno za Romunijo, dokazilo, da carinske uvozne formalnosti niso bile izvedene, ni pogoj za plačilo nadomestila v zvezi z blagom, navedenim v Prilogi II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1043/2005, zajetim v Sklepu Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija.
The fact that no export refund has been fixed in respect of the export to Romania of the goods listed in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005, which are covered by EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005, shall not be taken into account in determining the lowest rate of refund within the meaning of Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999.
Dejstvo, da ni bilo določeno izvozno nadomestilo glede izvoza blaga, navedenega v Prilogi II k Uredbi (ES) št. 1043/2005, zajetega v Sklepu Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija, v Romunijo, se ne upošteva pri določanju najnižje stopnje nadomestila v smislu člena 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999.
OJ L 324, 10.12.2005, p. 26.
UL L 324, 10.12.2005, str. 26.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2125/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2125/2005
laying down transitory measures arising from the adoption of improved trade arrangements concerning the export of certain processed agricultural products to Romania
o določitvi prehodnih ukrepov, ki izhajajo iz sprejetja izboljšanih trgovinskih režimov v zvezi z izvozom nekaterih predelanih kmetijskih proizvodov v Romunijo
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products [1], and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3448/93 z dne 6. decembra 1993 o trgovinskih režimih za nekatero blago, pridobljeno s predelavo kmetijskih [1] proizvodov, in zlasti člena 8(3) Uredbe,
The Community has recently concluded a trade agreement for processed agricultural products with Romania in preparation for its accession to the Community.
Skupnost je z Romunijo nedavno sklenila trgovinski sporazum za predelane kmetijske proizvode kot pripravo za njen pristop k Skupnosti.
This agreement provides for concessions involving on the Community side the abolition of export refunds on certain processed agricultural products.
Ta sporazum predvideva ugodnosti s strani Skupnosti v obliki odprave izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere predelane kmetijske proizvode.
EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 of 5 July 2005 concerning the improvement of the trade arrangements for processed agricultural products provided in Protocol 3 of the Europe Agreement [2] provides for the abolition of refunds on processed agricultural products not listed in Annex I to the Treaty when exported to Romania, from 1 December 2005.
Sklep Sveta št. 3/2005 z dne 5. julija 2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija o izboljšavi trgovinskih sporazumov za predelane kmetijske proizvode iz Protokola 3 Evropskega sporazuma [2] predvideva odpravo nadomestil za predelane kmetijske proizvode, ki niso navedeni v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, kadar se izvažajo v Romunijo, s 1. decembrom 2005.
In return for the abolition of export refunds as set out in EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005, the Romanian authorities have undertaken to grant reciprocal preferential import arrangements to goods imported into their territory if the goods concerned are accompanied by a copy of the export declaration containing a special mention indicating that they are not eligible for payment of export refunds.
V zameno za odpravo izvoznih nadomestil, kot je določeno v Sklepu Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija, so se romunske oblasti zavezale, da bodo za blago, uvoženo na njihovo ozemlje, dodelile vzajemne preferencialne uvozne režime, če je tako blago opremljeno s kopijo izvozne deklaracije, ki posebej navaja, da blago ni upravičeno do plačila izvoznih nadomestil.
The full rate of duty applies in the absence of such documentation.
Če take dokumentacije ni, se uporabi polna stopnja dajatve.
With the entry into force of EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005, goods for which operators have applied for refund certificates in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 of 30 June 2005 implementing Council Regulation 3448/93 as regards the system of granting export refunds on certain agricultural products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, and the criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds [3] will no longer be eligible for refund when they are exported to Romania.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Sklepa Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija blago, za katero so izvajalci zaprosili za izvozna nadomestila v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1043/2005 z dne 30. junija 2005 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3448/93 glede sistema dodeljevanja izvoznih nadomestil za nekatere kmetijske proizvode, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, in meril za določanje višine teh nadomestil [3], ne bo več upravičeno do nadomestila ob izvozu v Romunijo.
Reduction of refund certificates and pro rata release of the corresponding security should be allowed where operators can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the national competent authority that their claims for refunds have been affected by the entry into force of EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005.
Dovoliti je treba znižanje zneska potrdil o nadomestilu in sprostitev sorazmernega deleža ustrezne varščine, kadar izvozniki lahko zadovoljivo dokažejo pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu, da je na njihove zahtevke za nadomestila vplival začetek veljavnosti Sklepa Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija.
When assessing requests for reduction of the amount of the refund certificate and proportional release of the relevant security, the national competent authority should, in cases of doubt, have regard in particular to the documents referred to in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 of 21 December 1989 on scrutiny by Member States of transactions forming part of the system of financing by the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund and repealing Directive 77/435/EEC [4] without prejudice to the application of the other provisions of that Regulation.
Pri obravnavi zahtevkov za znižanje zneska potrdila o nadomestilu in sorazmerne sprostitve ustrezne varščine mora v primeru dvoma nacionalni pristojni organ zlasti upoštevati dokumentacijo iz člena 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4045/89 z dne 21. decembra 1989 o pregledu transakcij, ki so del sistema financiranja Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada, s strani držav članic in o razveljavitvi Direktive 77/435/EGS [4], ne da bi to vplivalo na uporabo drugih določb te uredbe.
For administrative reasons it is appropriate to provide that requests for reduction of the amount of the refund certificate and release of the security are to be made within a short period and that the amounts for which reductions have been accepted are to be notified to the Commission in time for their inclusion in the determination of the amount for which refund certificates for use from 1 February 2006 shall be issued, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005.
Iz upravnih razlogov je ustrezno zagotoviti, da se zahtevki za znižanje zneska potrdila o nadomestilu in sprostitev varščine oddajo v kratkem času in da se o zneskih, za katere so bila znižanja sprejeta, pravočasno obvesti Komisijo, da se lahko vključijo v določitev zneska, za katerega se izdajo potrdila o nadomestilu z uporabnostjo od 1. februarja 2006 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1043/2005.
Goods in respect of which export refunds have been abolished by EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 shall be imported free of customs duties, free of customs duties within quotas, or at reduced rates of customs duties into Romania if the goods concerned are accompanied by a duly completed copy of the export declaration with the following entry in Box 44:
Blago, za katero so bila odpravljena izvozna nadomestila s Sklepom Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija se uvozi v Romunijo brez carin, brez carin v okviru kvot ali po znižanih carinskih stopnjah, če je zadevno blago opremljeno z ustrezno izpolnjeno kopijo izvozne deklaracije z naslednjo navedbo v okencu 44:
‘Export Refund: 0 EUR/EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005’.
„Izvozno nadomestilo: 0 EUR/Sklep Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija“.
Refund certificates issued in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 in respect of exports of the goods for which export refunds have been abolished by EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 may, at request of the interested party, be reduced under the conditions provided for in paragraph 2.
Potrdila o nadomestilu, izdana v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1043/2005 v zvezi z izvozom blaga, za katero so bila izvozna nadomestila s Sklepom Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija odpravljena, se lahko na zahtevo zainteresiranih strank znižajo pod pogoji iz odstavka 2.
To be eligible for reduction of the amount of the refund certificate, the certificates referred to in paragraph 1 must have been applied for before the date of entry into force of EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005 and their validity period must expire after 30 November 2005.
Da bi bila potrdila iz odstavka 1 upravičena do znižanja zneska potrdila o nadomestilu, je treba zanje zaprositi pred dnem začetka veljavnosti Sklepa Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES–Romunija, njihovo obdobje veljavnosti pa mora poteči po 30. novembru 2005.
The certificate shall be reduced by the amount for which the interested party is unable to claim export refunds following the entry into force of EU-Romania Association Council Decision No 3/2005, as demonstrated to the satisfaction of the national competent authority.
Znesek potrdila se zniža za znesek, za katerega zainteresirana stranka ne more zahtevati izvoznih nadomestil po začetku veljavnosti Sklepa Sveta št. 3/2005 o pridružitvi ES– Romunija, kot je zadovoljivo dokazano pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu.
To be eligible for consideration under Article 2, the national competent authority must receive the requests by 7 January 2006, at the latest.
Da bi bili zahtevki upravičeni do obravnave iz člena 2, jih mora pristojni nacionalni organ prejeti najpozneje do 7. januarja 2006.
Member States shall notify the Commission not later than 14 January 2006 of the amounts for which reductions have been accepted in accordance with Article 2(3) of this Regulation.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo najpozneje do 14. januarja 2006 o zneskih znižanj, ki so jih sprejele v skladu s členom 2(3) te uredbe.
The notified amounts shall be taken into account for the determination of the amount for which refund certificates for use from 1 February 2006 shall be issued, pursuant to point (c) of Article 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005.
Priglašeni zneski se upoštevajo pri določitvi zneska, za katerega se bodo v skladu s točko (c) člena 33 Uredbe (ES) št. 1043/2005 izdala potrdila o nadomestilu, ki se bodo uporabljala od 1. februarja 2006.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2154/2002 (OJ L 328, 5.12.2002, p. 4).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2154/2002 (UL L 328, 5.12.2002, str. 4).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2126/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2126/2005
amending Regulation (EEC) No 350/93 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 350/93 o uvrstitvi določenega blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [1], and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2658/87 z dne 23. julija 1987 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi in skupni carinski tarifi [1], zlasti člena 9(1)(a) te uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 350/93 of 17 February 1993 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature [2] lays down measures concerning the classification in the Combined Nomenclature of a pair of shorts described in point 8 of the Annex to that Regulation (photo 509).
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 350/93 z dne 17. februarja 1993 o uvrstitvi določenega blaga v kombinirano nomenklaturo [2] določa ukrepe glede uvrstitve kratkih hlač v kombinirano nomenklaturo, ki so opisane v točki 8 priloge k tej uredbi (fotografija 509).
It is necessary to specify the description of the pockets of the garment in question and to align the second paragraph of the reasons accordingly, in order to avoid divergent classification.
Treba je opredeliti opis žepov zadevnega oblačila in drugi odstavek utemeljitev ustrezno prilagoditi, da se bomo izognili različnim uvrstitvam.
Up to now, the fact that the pockets have no closing system was merely illustrated in photo 509.
Do sedaj je bilo dejstvo, da žepi nimajo zapenjalnega sistema, samo ilustrirano na fotografiji 509.
Moreover, in the reasons given for the classification of the garment in question reference is made to Note 8 of Chapter 62 of the Combined Nomenclature without mentioning which paragraph of that Note has been applied, which might lead to divergent classifications.
Poleg tega se dane utemeljitve za uvrstitev zadevnega oblačila sklicujejo na opombo 8 k poglavju 62 kombinirane nomenklature, ni pa navedeno, kateri odstavek opombe je bil uporabljen, kar bi lahko povzročilo različne uvrstitve.
In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature it should be made clear that the classification laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 350/93 was not based on the first paragraph of Note 8 and was therefore not determined by the reason that the garment in question has a cut which clearly indicates that it is designed for women.
Zaradi zagotovitve enotne uporabe kombinirane nomenklature je treba pojasniti, da uvrstitev, določena z uredbo (EGS) št. 350/93, ni temeljila na prvem odstavku opombe 8 in zato ni bila opredeljena z utemeljitvijo, da je iz kroja zadevnega oblačila jasno razvidno, da je namenjeno ženskam.
Provision should be made that the second paragraph of Note 8 to Chapter 62 was applied and that the garment in question was classified within CN code 62046390 because the cut of the garment in question does not give ample indications as to whether it was intended for men or women and therefore cannot be identified as either men's or boy's garment or as women's or girls' garment.
Vnesti je treba določbo, da je bil uporabljen drugi odstavek opombe 8 k poglavju 62 in da je bilo zadevno oblačilo uvrščeno pod oznako KN 62046390, ker iz kroja zadevnega oblačila ni popolnoma razvidno, ali je namenjeno moškim ali ženskam, in ga zato ni mogoče opredeliti kot moško oziroma deško oblačilo ali kot žensko oziroma dekliško oblačilo.
Regulation (EEC) No 350/93 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zaradi tega je treba uredbo (EGS) št. 350/93 ustrezno spremeniti.