natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the general principles laid down in point 1.2 of the Guidelines, aid which is granted without imposing any obligations on the part of recipients and which is intended to improve the situation of undertakings and increase their business liquidity, or is calculated on the quantity produced or marketed, products prices, units produced or the means of production, and which has the effect of reducing the recipient’s production costs or improving the recipient’s income is, as operating aid, incompatible with the common market.
Glede na splošna načela, opredeljena v točki 1.2. smernic, je pomoč, ki je odobrena brez obveznosti s strani prejemnika in ki je namenjena izboljšanju stanja podjetij ter izboljšanju poslovne likvidnosti ali je izračunana na podlagi proizvedene količine ali količine, dane v promet, cen proizvodov, proizvedenih enot ali proizvajalnih sredstev ter vpliva na zmanjšanje proizvodnih stroškov prejemnika ali izboljšanje prejemnikovega prihodka, kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
With regard to such operating aid, it is pointed out in that point of the Guidelines that the Commission is required to assess it on a case-by-case basis where it is linked to a restructuring plan considered to be compatible with the common market.
Glede takšne pomoči za tekoče poslovanje je v navedeni točki smernic poudarjeno, da jo mora Komisija oceniti na osnovi posameznega primera, če je povezana s programom prestrukturiranja, za katerega se šteje, da je združljiv s skupnim trgom.
The United Kingdom has not provided any restructuring plan for the Commission to assess.
Združeno kraljestvo ni pripravilo nobenega programa prestrukturiranja, ki bi ga Komisija lahko ocenila.
Since, according to the Guidelines, operating aid can only be declared compatible with the common market if such aid is linked to a restructuring plan compatible with the common market, the investments do not comply with the Guidelines.
Ker se lahko v skladu s smernicami pomoč za tekoče poslovanje razglasi kot združljivo s skupnim trgom le, če je takšna pomoč povezana s programom za prestrukturiranje, združljivim s skupnim trgom, naložbe niso skladne s smernicami.
Recovery of the aid.
Vračilo pomoči
Under Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, where negative decisions are taken in case of unlawful aid, the Commission must decide that the Member State concerned must take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
Na podlagi člena 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999, kjer so sprejete negativne odločbe v primeru nezakonite pomoči, mora Komisija odločiti, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za vračilo pomoči od upravičenca.
The Commission should not require recovery of the aid if that would be contrary to a general principle of Community law.
Komisija ne sme zahtevati vračila pomoči, če je to v nasprotju s splošnim načelom prava Skupnosti.
The principle of protection of legitimate expectations is a general principle of Community law.
Načelo varovanja pravno utemeljenih pričakovanj je splošno načelo prava Skupnosti.
The Commission considers that, in the present case, that principle precludes recovery for the following reasons.
Komisija meni, da v tem primeru to načelo onemogoča vračilo iz naslednjih razlogov:
On 3 June 2003 the Commission, by Decision 2003/612/EC, took a negative decision regarding loans granted for the purchase of fishing quotas in the Shetland Islands [8].
junija 2003 je Komisija z Odločbo 2003/612/ES sprejela negativno odločbo glede odobrenih posojil za nakup ribolovnih kvot na Shetlandskih otokih [8].
In its decision the Commission stated that whilst there was no necessary link between actions and decisions of the Commission in relation to the Community Structural Funds in the context of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 [9] and Commission decisions on State aid, in the specific circumstances in the case in question, legitimate expectations as to the private nature of the fund in question may have been created through the combination of a number of events.
V svoji odločbi je Komisija navedla, da čeprav ni bilo nobene potrebne povezave med dejanji in odločbami Komisije glede strukturnih skladov Skupnosti v zvezi z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1260/1999 [9] in odločbami Komisije o državni pomoči, v posebnih okoliščinah zadevnega primera, so se pravno utemeljena pričakovanja o zasebni naravi zadevnega sklada lahko porajala zaradi številnih dogodkov.
The Commission found that both it and the United Kingdom government had consistently acted in such a way as to suggest that the fund was a private fund for the purposes of the rules governing the Community Structural Funds, and that even if, legally speaking, there was no automatic link between the two issues, this may have led to a reasonable assumption on the part of the national authorities and fishermen, that grants from such a fund did not fall under the rules on State aid, thus creating legitimate expectations in this respect.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je tako kot vlada Združenega kraljestva dosledno ravnala, kot da je sklad zasebni sklad zaradi pravil, ki urejajo strukturne sklade Skupnosti, in da četudi iz pravnega vidika ne obstaja samodejna povezava med tema dvema zadevama, je to lahko vodilo do upravičene domneve nacionalnih organov in ribičev, da za prejete subvencije iz takšnega sklada ne veljajo pravila za državne pomoči, kar je izzvalo pravno utemeljena pričakovanja v zvezi s tem.
In addition, it considered in its Decision that, in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Highlands and Islands Objective I programme 1994-1996, the funding from SLAP was regarded as a private contribution.
Poleg tega je Komisija v svoji odločbi menila, da se je v Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (ESRR), v okviru cilja I Programa za Škotsko višavje in otoke 1994-1996, financiranje, ki ga je izvedel SLAP, štelo za zasebni prispevek.
Furthermore, given the close links between Orkney and Shetland, the Shetland Islands authorities were probably aware of the fact that the parallel Orkney Reserve Fund (Case C 87/2001 [10]) was considered in practice by the United Kingdom authorities and the Commission as being of a private nature, thus making it permissible to provide a private co-financing contribution in the context of financing from the European Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF).
Če upoštevamo tesne vezi med Orkneyjem in Shetlandom, so bili organi Shetlanskih otokov verjetno seznanjeni z dejstvom, da sta Združeno kraljestvo in Komisija vzporedni rezervni sklad Orkney (primer C 87/2001) [10] štela za zasebni sklad in tako dopuščala zasebni prispevek sofinanciranja v okviru financiranja iz Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS).
Accordingly, the Commission took the view that those elements, taken together, had created a legitimate expectation among the Shetland authorities and the bodies involved, as well as among the fishermen; the Commission concluded that, in view of that, they might have wrongly assumed that the State aid rules of the Treaty did not apply, even if legally speaking there was no automatic link between the two issues.
Zato Komisija meni, da so ti elementi skupaj osnovali pravno utemeljeno prepričanje med organi Shetlanda in udeleženimi organi ter med ribiči. Komisija je zaključila, da so s tega vidika morda napačno sklepali, da pravila za državno pomoč iz Pogodbe ne veljajo, čeprav iz pravnega vidika ni bilo samodejne povezave med tema dvema zadevama.
The investments of SLAP currently under investigation are funded from the same type of funding, during the same timeframe.
Naložbe SLAP, ki se trenutno raziskujejo, so financirane iz iste vrste sredstev, v istem časovnem okviru.
Just as in that case, the actions of SLAP were considered to be the actions of a private company, concerning private funding from the Shetland Islands Charitable Trust.
Tako kot v tem primeru se dejanja SLAP štejejo za dejanja zasebnega podjetja, ki zadevajo zasebnega financiranja Dobrodelnega sklada Shetlandskih otokov.
In addition, given the circumstances and the specific features of the Shetland community, Shetland Seafish Ltd must have been aware of the loan scheme for the purchasing of fishing quotas and in particular the explanatory leaflet referred to in paragraph 68 of Decision 2003/612/EC, stating that the grants and loans from the Charitable Trust would be regarded as private contributions.
Poleg tega, glede na okoliščine in posebnosti Shetlandske skupnosti, mora Shetland Seafish Ltd. upoštevati sheme posojil za nakup ribolovnih kvot in zlasti obrazložitvenega navodila, navedena v odstavku 68 Odločbe 2003/612/ES, ki navaja, da se subvencije in posojila Dobrodelnega sklada štejejo za zasebni prispevek.
It is established case law that there can be no legitimate expectations in favour of the beneficiary of an aid deriving from the behaviour of a national authority when the procedure laid down in Article 88 of the Treaty had not been followed (judgment of the Court in Alcan Deutschland [11]).
Uveljavljena sodna praksa določa, da niso možna pravno utemeljena pričakovanja v korist upravičenca pomoči, ki izhaja iz vedenja nacionalnega organa, kadar se ne ravna v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 88 Pogodbe (sodba sodišča v primeru Alcan Deutschland [11].
However, since the Commission has also consistently acted in such a way as to suggest that the fund is a private fund, the Commission considers that, given the circumstances of the case and the decision of the Commission referred to above, both SLAP and Shetland Seafish Ltd, the beneficiary of the aid, could assume that only private funds are involved and that, therefore, the State aid rules of the Treaty did not apply.
Ker pa je Komisija dosledno delovala tako, kot da je sklad zasebni sklad, Komisija meni, da bi upravičenca pomoči SLAP in Shetland Seafish Ltd. glede na okoliščine primera in zgoraj navedeno odločbo Komisije lahko predvidevala, da so udeleženi le zasebni skladi in da zato pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe ne veljajo.
On those grounds and on the basis of Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, since the principle of protection of legitimate expectations is a ‘general principle of Community law’, recovery of the aid from which Shetland Seafish Ltd has benefited will not be required.
Na podlagi tega in na osnovi člena 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 in ker je načelo varovanja pravno utemeljenih pričakovanj „splošno načelo prava Skupnosti“, ni potrebno vračilo pomoči, ki jo je prejel Shetland Seafish Ltd.
V CONCLUSION
V SKLEP
In the light of the assessment made in Section IV, the Commission finds that the United Kingdom has, in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, unlawfully granted aid to Shetland Seafish Ltd by acquiring shares in the company under circumstances and conditions that would not have been acceptable to a normal private market-economy investor.
Glede na oceno iz oddelka IV Komisija ugotavlja, da je Združeno kraljestvo s kršitvijo člena 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito dodelilo pomoč Shetland Seafish Ltd. z nakupom delnic podjetja v okoliščinah in ob pogojih, ki ne bi bili sprejemljivi običajnemu zasebnemu vlagatelju v tržnem gospodarstvu.
The Commission considers that these investments are not compatible with the common market inasmuch as they cannot be considered normal commercial investments which could have been decided upon by any normal private investor,
Komisija meni, da te naložbe niso združljive s skupnim trgom, ker jih ni mogoče šteti za običajne gospodarske naložbe, za katere bi se odločil običajni zasebni vlagatelj.
The aid granted in 1999 and 2000 by way of investments made by Shetland Leasing and Property Ltd in Shetland Seafish Ltd is not compatible with the common market.
Pomoč, ki je bila dodeljena v letih 1999 in 2000 v obliki naložb Shetland Leasing and Property Ltd. v Shetland Seafish Ltd., ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid mentioned in Article 1 does not have to be recovered.
Pomoči, omenjene v členu 1, ni potrebno vračati.
OJ C 141, 10.6.2005, p. 12.
UL C 141, 10.6.2005, str. 12.
OJ C 100, 27.3.1997, p. 12.
UL C 100, 27.3.1997, str. 12.
OJ L 211, 21.8.2003, p. 63.
UL L 211, 21.8.2003, str. 63.
Case C 482/99 France v Commission, [2002] ECR I-4397.
Primer C 482/99 Francija proti Komisiji, [2002] PSES I-4397.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2468/98 of 3 November 1998 laying down the criteria and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries and aquaculture sector and the processing and marketing of its products (OJ L 312, 20.11.1998, p. 19).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2468/98 z dne 3. novembra 1998, ki določa merila in predpise glede strukturne pomoči Skupnosti v ribiškem in ribogojskem sektorju ter predelave in trženja njenih proizvodov (UL L 312, 20.11.1998, str. 19).
OJ C 38, 12.2.2002, p. 2.
UL C 38, 12.2.2002, str. 2.
Case 24/95, Land Rheinland-Pfalz v. Alcan Deutschland [1997] ECR I-01591.
Primer 24/95, dežela Rheinland-Pfalz proti Alcan Deutschland [1997] PSES I-01591.
The other shareholders of ordinary shares were the Shetland Seafish Producers Organisation Ltd (43750 shares), Mr. L.A.
Drugi delničarji navadnih delnic so bili Shetland Seafish Producers Organisation Ltd. (43750 delnic), L.A.
Williamson (18750 shares), Mr. R.A.
Williamson (18750 delnic), R.A.
Carter (18750 shares) and the Shetland Fisheries Centre Ltd (12500 shares).
Carter (18750 delnic) in Shetland Fisheries Centre Ltd. (12500 delnic).
According to point 2.3 of the Guidelines, aid to investment in the processing and marketing of fishery products may be deemed compatible with the common market provided that the conditions for granting it are comparable with those laid down in Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 and are at least as stringent, and provided further that the level of the aid does not exceed, in subsidy equivalent, the overall level of the national and Community subsidies permitted under those rules. In addition, if the aid concerns investments that are, according to Regulation (EC) No 3699/93, not eligible for Community assistance, the Commission has to assess its compatibility with the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy on a case-by-case basis.
V skladu s točko 2.3. smernic je pomoč za naložbo v predelavo in trženje ribiških proizvodov lahko združljiva s skupnim trgom, če so pogoji za njeno dodelitev primerljivi s tistimi iz Uredbe (ES) št. 3699/93 in so vsaj tako strogi ter če znesek pomoči kot protivrednosti subvencije ne presega skupnega zneska državnih subvencij in subvencij Skupnosti, dovoljenih po teh pravilihPoleg tega mora Komisija, če se pomoč nanaša na naložbe, ki v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 3699/93 niso upravičene do pomoči Komisije, oceniti skladnost pomoči s cilji skupne ribiške politike za vsak posamezen primer.
of 17 March 2006
z dne 17. marca 2006
concerning certain interim protection measures in relation to a suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Israel
o nekaterih začasnih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s sumom na visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v Izraelu
(notified under document number C(2006) 902)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 902)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC [1], and in particular Article 18 (1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS ter 90/675/EGS [1], in zlasti člena 18(1) Direktive,
Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming.
Aviarna influenca je nalezljiva virusna bolezen pri perutnini in ptičih, ki povzroča smrt in motnje, ki lahko hitro dobijo epizootske razsežnosti ter lahko postanejo resna nevarnost za zdravje živali in ljudi ter močno zmanjšajo donosnost reje perutnine.
Isarel has notified to the Commission the isolation of an H5 avian influenza virus collected from a clinical case.
Izrael je obvestil Komisijo o odkritju enega kliničnega primera virusa aviarne influence H5.
The clinical picture allows the suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza pending the determination of the neuraminidase (N) type.
Iz klinične slike je mogoče sumiti na visoko patogeno aviarno influenco, dokler se ne določita nevraminidazni (N) tip.
In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate as an immediate measure to suspend imports of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game birds, live birds other than poultry and hatching eggs of these species from Israel.
Glede na tveganje prenosa bolezni na živali v Skupnosti je zato ustrezno, da se kot takojšnji ukrep začasno ustavi uvoz žive perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ter gojene pernate divjadi, živih ptic, ki niso perutnina, in valilnih jajc teh vrst iz Izraela.
As Israel is authorised for imports of game trophies and eggs for human consumption, imports into the Community of these products should be suspended as well because of the animal health risk involved.
Glede na to, da ima Izrael dovoljenje za uvoz lovskih trofej in jajc za prehrano ljudi, je treba uvoz teh proizvodov v Skupnost začasno ustaviti zaradi tveganja za zdravje živali.
Furthermore the importation into the Community from Israel should be suspended for fresh meat of poultry, ratites and wild and farmed feathered game and importation of meat preparations, minced meat, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species.
Poleg tega je treba začasno ustaviti uvoz svežega perutninskega mesa, mesa ratitov ter pernate divjadi in gojene pernate divjadi ter uvoz mesnih pripravkov, mletega mesa, mehansko izkoščenega mesa in mesnih proizvodov, ki so sestavljeni iz ali vsebujejo meso tistih vrst iz Izraela v Skupnost.
Certain products derived from poultry slaughtered before 15 February 2006 should also continue to be authorised, taking into account the incubation period of the disease.
Ob upoštevanju inkubacijske dobe bolezni je treba še naprej dovoliti uvoz nekaterih proizvodov iz perutnine, zaklane pred 15. februarjem 2006.
Commission Decision 2005/432/EC [3] laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC lays down the list of third countries from which Member States may authorise the importation of meat products and establishes treatment regimes considered effective in inactivating the respective pathogens.
Odločba Komisije 2005/432/ES [3] o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in javnozdravstvenim varstvom ter vzorcih spričeval za uvoz mesnih izdelkov za prehrano ljudi iz tretjih držav in o razveljavitvi odločb 97/41/ES, 97/221/ES in 97/222/ES določa seznam tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice lahko odobrijo uvoz mesnih proizvodov in predpisuje režime obdelave, ki veljajo za učinkovite pri inaktivaciji zadevnih patogenov.
It appears therefore appropriate, that imports of poultry meat products originating in Israel and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product should continue to be authorised.
Zato se zdi primerno, da se še naprej dovoli uvoz proizvodov iz perutninskega mesa po poreklu iz Izraela, ki so bili obdelani pri temperaturi najmanj 70 °C v celotnem proizvodu.
The situation shall be reviewed at the next meeting of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Stanje se ponovno pregleda na naslednji seji Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali –
Member States shall suspend the importation from the territory of Israel of:
Države članice z ozemlja Izraela začasno ustavijo uvoz:
live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game, live birds other than poultry as defined in Article 1, third indent, of Decision 2000/666/EC, and hatching eggs of these species,
žive perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ter gojene pernate divjadi, živih ptic, ki niso perutnina, kakor so opredeljene v tretji alinei člena 1 Odločbe 2000/666/ES,
minced meat, meat preparations, mechanically separated meat and meat products consisting of or containing meat of those species,
mletega mesa, mesnih pripravkov, mehansko izkoščenega mesa in mesnih proizvodov, ki so sestavljeni iz ali vsebujejo meso navedenih vrst,
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of those species,
surove hrane za hišne živali in nepredelanih posamičnih krmil, ki vsebujejo katere koli dele teh vrst, jajc za prehrano ljudi,
eggs for human consumption, and
neobdelanih lovskih trofej katerih koli ptic ter
non-treated game trophies from any birds.
nepredelanega perja in delov peres.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of the products covered by paragraph 1 first to fourth indent, which have been obtained from birds slaughtered before 15 February 2006.
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice dovolijo uvoz proizvodov, zajetih s prvo do četrto alineo tega odstavka, ki so bili pridobljeni iz ptic, zaklanih pred 15. februarjem 2006.
In the veterinary certificates/commercial documents accompanying consignments of the products referred to in paragraph 2 the following words as appropriate to the species shall be included:
V veterinarska spričevala/trgovinske dokumente, ki spremljajo pošiljke proizvodov iz odstavka 2, se primerno vrsti vključi naslednje besedilo:
‘Fresh poultry meat/fresh ratite meat/fresh meat of wild feathered game/fresh meat of farmed feathered game/meat product consisting of, or containing meat of poultry, ratites, farmed or wild feathered game meat/meat preparation consisting of, or containing meat of poultry, ratites, farmed or wild feathered game meat/raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of poultry, ratites, farmed or wild feathered game obtained from birds slaughtered before 15 February 2006 and in accordance with Article 1(2) of Commission Decision 2006/227/EC.
„Sveže perutninsko meso/sveže meso ratitov/sveže meso pernate divjadi/sveže meso gojene pernate divjadi/mesni proizvod, ki sestoji iz ali vsebuje meso perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ali gojene pernate divjadi/mesni pripravek, ki je sestavljen iz ali vsebuje meso perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ali gojene pernate divjadi/surova hrana za hišne živali in nepredelana posamična krmila, ki vsebujejo katere koli dele perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ali gojene pernate divjadi pridobljene iz ptic, zaklanih pred 15. februarjem 2006, in v skladu s členom 1(2) Odločbe Komisije 2006/227/ES.
By derogation from paragraph 1, third indent, Member States shall authorise the importation of meat products consisting of or containing meat of poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game under the condition that the meat of these species has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to under points B, C or D in Part IV of Annex II to Commission Decision 2005/432/EC.
Z odstopanjem od tretje alinee odstavka 1 države članice dovolijo uvoz mesnih proizvodov, ki so sestavljeni iz ali vsebujejo meso perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi in gojene pernate divjadi, kadar je bilo meso teh vrst obdelano na enega od posebnih načinov iz točk B, C ali D dela IV Priloge II k Odločbi Komisije 2005/432/ES.
Done at Brussels, 17 March 2006.
V Bruslju, 17. marca 2006
OJ L 81, 18.3.2006, p. 35.’
UL L 81, 18.3.2006, str. 35.“
Council Decision 2006/228/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2006/228/PNZ
fixing the date of application of certain provisions of Decision 2005/211/JHA concerning the introduction of some new functions for the Schengen Information System, including the fight against terrorism
o določitvi datuma uporabe nekaterih določb Sklepa 2005/211/PNZ o uvedbi nekaterih novih funkcij za schengenski informacijski sistem, vključno v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu