natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nevertheless, such sales could not be regarded as being made in the ordinary course of trade by reason of price.
Kljub temu pa te prodaje zaradi cene ni bilo mogoče obravnavati, kot da je bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Consequently, and in the absence of reliable data from other producers in the exporting country, normal value had to be constructed, as determined by Article 2(3) of the Basic Regulation.
Zato in zaradi pomanjkanja zanesljivih podatkov od drugih proizvajalcev v državi izvoznici, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana, kot je določeno v členu 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
To construct normal value actual SG&A expenses incurred by the cooperating exporting producer concerned on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period, were added to its own average cost of manufacturing, of each exported type, during the investigation period.
Pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti so bili lastnim povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje vsakega izvoznega tipa, ki jih je imel zadevni sodelujoči proizvajalec-izvoznik v obdobju preiskave, dodani dejanski stroški PS&A, ki jih je ta proizvajalec-izvoznik v obdobju preiskave imel v domači prodaji podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Since no reliable data was available for other exporting producers in Saudi Arabia (see recitals (104) to (106)) and since no information pertaining to production and sales of the same general category of products was made available by the exporting producer concerned, the profit margin had to be determined on the basis of any other reasonable method, as determined by Article 2(6)(c) of the Basic Regulation.
Ker za proizvajalce-izvoznike v Saudovi Arabiji zanesljivi podatki niso bili na voljo (glej uvodne izjave od (104) do (106)) in ker zadevni proizvajalec-izvoznik ni predložil informacij glede proizvodnje in prodaje izdelkov enake splošne kategorije, je bila stopnja dobička določena na podlagi kakršne koli druge primerne metode, kot je določeno v členu 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect it was considered that a profit margin of 5 % was reasonable.
V zvezi s tem je bilo sklenjeno, da je primerna petodstotna stopnja dobička.
No information was available which would indicate that such profit margin exceeds the profit normally realized by other exporters or producers on sales of products of the same general category in the domestic market of Saudi Arabia, as required by Article 2(6)(c) of the Basic Regulation.
Na voljo ni bilo nobenih informacij, ki bi nakazovale, da takšna stopnja dobička presega dobiček, ki ga imajo navadno drugi izvozniki ali proizvajalci pri prodaji izdelka enake splošne kategorije na domačem trgu v Saudovi Arabiji, kot zahteva člen 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
All sales were made to the Community via a related importer, which resold the product to both related and unrelated customers.
Vsa prodaja v Skupnost je potekala preko povezanega uvoznika, ki je izdelek prodajal tako povezanim kot nepovezanim strankam.
Those related customers, in turn, resold the product concerned to other independent customers.
Povezane stranke so zadevni izdelek prodajale drugim neodvisnim strankam.
Consequently, the export price was constructed pursuant to Article 2(9) of the Basic Regulation.
Zato je bila izvozna cena konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made for differences in transportation, insurance, packing, and credit costs.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za razlike v prevozu, zavarovanju, pakiranju in kreditnih stroških.
An allowance to the normal value was also claimed by this exporting producer for after sales costs on the domestic market.
Ta proizvajalec-izvoznik je zahteval tudi odbitek od normalne vrednosti za stroške, ki jih je imel na domačem trgu po prodaji.
Besides the fact that no evidence was available substantiating the amount claimed, it could not be concluded, on the basis of the information made available, that this factor affected price comparability.
Poleg dejstva, da niso bili predloženi nobeni dokazi, ki bi utemeljevali zahtevani znesek, na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij prav tako ni bilo mogoče določiti, ali je ta dejavnik vplival na primerljivost cen.
In particular, it could not be shown that domestic customers consistently paid different prices due to this factor.
Zlasti ni bilo mogoče dokazati, da so domače stranke zaradi tega dejavnika vedno plačevale različne cene.
In addition, it was established that these expenses related not only to sales of the like product in the domestic market but also to other markets, including sales of the product concerned to the Community.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno tudi, da so se ti stroški nanašali ne le na prodajo podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu, ampak tudi na prodajo na drugih trgih, vključno s prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
On the basis of the above, the allowance claimed had to be rejected, since it did not meet the requirements of Article 2(10).
Na podlagi zgornjega je bil zahtevek za odbitek zavrnjen, ker ni izpolnjeval zahtev člena 2(10).
The questionnaire reply submitted by this exporting producer was significantly deficient and contained contradictory information.
Odgovor na vprašalnik, ki ga je predložil ta proizvajalec-izvoznik, je bil popolnoma nezadosten in je vseboval protislovne informacije.
Although the company was requested to correct, complete and clarify its reply, it did not provide the missing information and did not make appropriate corrections.
Čeprav je bila družba pozvana, da popravi, dopolni in razjasni svoj odgovor, tega ni storila, niti ni predložila manjkajočih informacij.
Furthermore, the on-spot verification revealed that NPF did not report more than half of its domestic sales of PSF in the IP.
Med preverjanjem na kraju samem se je pokazalo, da NPF ni poročala o več kot polovici domače prodaje RVP, ki jo je imela v OP.
In addition, it was not possible to reconcile the company's reported total sales, including export sales to the Community, with its accounting documents.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče uskladiti skupne prodaje, ki jo je družba navedla v poročilu, vključno z izvozno prodajo v Skupnost, z njenimi računovodskimi listinami.
It was therefore considered that the sales data submitted in the questionnaire reply could not be regarded as a reliable basis to establish a dumping margin.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da podatkov o prodaji, ki jih je družba navedla v odgovoru na vprašalnik, ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanesljivo podlago za določitev stopnje dampinga.
Furthermore, data pertaining to cost of production could not be reconciled with the company's internal accounting documents and no substantiating evidence was made available showing that the reported data was indeed complete and correct.
Nadalje, tudi podatkov o stroških proizvodnje ni bilo mogoče uskladiti z internimi računovodskimi listinami družbe in podani niso bili nobeni dokazi, ki bi utemeljevali, da so bili sporočeni podatki resnično popolni in pravilni.
It was therefore concluded that the information submitted on the cost of production of the like product was not reliable and could not be used as a basis to determine the normal value.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da predložene informacije o stroških proizvodnje podobnega izdelka niso zanesljive in jih ni mogoče uporabiti kot podlago za določitev normalne vrednosti.
In view of the above, it was considered that the dumping margin for this exporting producer could not be established on the basis of its own data.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjega je bilo zaključeno, da stopnje dampinga za tega proizvajalca-izvoznika ni mogoče določiti na podlagi njegovih podatkov.
The dumping margin was therefore determined on the basis of facts available, as foreseen by Article 18 of the Basic Regulation.
Zato je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov, kot to predvideva člen 18 osnovne uredbe.
In this regard, and given the insufficient information submitted by NPF, there were no reasons to conclude that NPF dumped at a different level than the other exporting producer in Saudi Arabia.
V tej zvezi, pa tudi zaradi nezadostnih informacij, ki jih je predložil NPF, ni bilo razlogov za sklep, da je NPF izvajal damping po drugačni stopnji kot drugi proizvajalci-izvozniki v Saudovi Arabiji.
Therefore, it was considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for NPF at the same level as the one established for the other exporting producer in Saudi Arabia.
Zato se je zdelo primerno, da se stopnja dampinga za NPF določi enako, kot je stopnja dampinga, določena za drugega proizvajalca-izvoznika v Saudovi Arabiji.
The company contested the approach arguing that it had acted with total transparency and that any errors in the information provided were unintentional and purely clerical.
Družba je takšnemu pristopu nasprotovala in trdila, da je delovala popolnoma pregledno in da so kakršne koli napake v predloženih podatkih nenamerne in izključno tipkarske.
Nevertheless, no further verifiable information was provided which could allow the Commission to revise its findings.
Kljub temu pa niso bili predloženi nobeni preverljivi podatki, ki bi Komisiji omogočali, da pregleda svoje ugotovitve.
The other Saudi exporting producer disagreed with the above approach, arguing that it would constitute a bonus for non-cooperation.
Drugi proizvajalec-izvoznik iz Saudove Arabije se z zgornjim pristopom ni strinjal, saj naj bi predstavljal bonus za nesodelovanje.
It was further argued that NPF exported other product types, which are not comparable to the types exported by Sabic.
Trdil je tudi, da je NPF izvažal druge vrste izdelkov, ki niso primerljive s tipi izdelkov, ki jih je izvažal Sabic.
In this respect it should be noted that the determination of the dumping margin for NPF was made on the basis of the best information available.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je bila določitev stopnje dampinga za NPF izpeljana na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih informacij.
The vast majority (81 %) of exports of the product concerned from Saudi Arabia to the Community were made by Sabic. Therefore, in the absence of any other reasonable method, this was considered an appropriate basis for the setting of the dumping margin for NPF.
Ker Sabic izvaža veliko večino (81 %) zadevnega izdelka iz Saudove Arabije v Skupnost, se je zaradi odsotnosti drugih ustreznih metod, zdelo primerno, da se vzame kot podlaga za določitev stopnje dampinga za NPF.
Furthermore, as stated above, there were no reasons to conclude that NPF dumped at a different level than the other exporting producer in Saudi Arabia.
Nadalje, kot je navedeno zgoraj, ni bilo razlogov za domnevo, da je NPF izvajal damping po drugačni stopnji kot drugi proizvajalec -izvoznik v Saudovi Arabiji.
Regarding the different product types exported by the two companies it is noted that they all fall within the definition of the product concerned.
V zvezi z različnimi vrstami izdelkov, ki sta jih družbi izvažali, se opozarja, da spadata obe pod isto definicijo zadevnega izdelka.
In these circumstances, the approach set out in recital (106) is considered reasonable.
V teh okoliščinah se pristop Komisije obravnava kot ustrezen.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the company's weighted average normal value with its weighted average export prices per product type, as determined above.
Stopnja dampinga je bila določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti družbe z njenimi tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami po tipu izdelka, kot je določeno zgoraj.
As explained in recital (106), the dumping margin for the other exporting producer in Saudi Arabia, namely NPF, was established at the same level as the margin found for the cooperating producer in Saudi Arabia (Sabic).
Kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (103), je bila stopnja dampinga za drugega proizvajalca-izvoznika v Saudovi Arabiji, torej NPF, določena enako kot stopnja, ki je bila ugotovljena za drugega sodelujočega proizvajalca v Saudovi Arabiji (Sabic).
The comparison between the normal value and the export price showed the existence of dumping.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je pokazala obstoj dampinga.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, are:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek neto cene franko meja Skupnosti CIF, neocarinjeno, so:
Since the aforementioned two companies represented all export sales from Saudi Arabia to the Community, as explained in recital (48), the residual duty was also set at the level of the cooperating company with the highest dumping margin.
Ker sta zgoraj omenjeni družbi predstavljali vso izvozno prodajo iz Saudove Arabije v Skupnost, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (48), je bila tudi preostala dajatev določena po stopnji sodelujoče družbe z najvišjo stopnjo dampinga.
Thus, the residual duty expressed as a percentage of the CIF net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, is 31,7 %.
Zato je preostala dajatev, izražena kot odstotek neto cene franko meja Skupnosti CIF, neocarinjena, 31,7 %.
Questionnaire replies were received from the three exporting producers selected in the sample.
Odgovore na vprašalnik so poslali trije proizvajalci-izvozniki, izbrani v vzorcu.
One exporting producer initially submitted data for all products containing polyester.
En proizvajalec-izvoznik je sprva predložil podatke za vse izdelke, ki vsebujejo poliester.
However, since the present review concerns only synthetic staple fibres of polyester, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning which are currently classifiable within CN code 55032000 (i.e. with 50 % or more of polyester), all products that were declared by the exporting producer as containing less than 50 % of polyester were disregarded.
Ker pa trenutni pregled zadeva samo sintetična rezana vlakna iz poliestra, nemikana, nečesana in ne drugače pripravljena za predenje, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznako KN 55032000 (tj. s 50 % ali več poliestra), so se upoštevali samo izdelki, ki jih je proizvajalec-izvoznik označil, da imajo 50 % ali več poliestra.
For the three exporting producers selected in the sample, sales of the like product were representative as defined in recitals (29) to (31).
Prodaja podobnega izdelka treh proizvajalcev-izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorcu, je bila reprezentativna, kot je opredeljeno zgoraj v uvodnih izjavah od (29) do (31).
To a large extent, normal value was based on prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in the Republic of Korea, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the Basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je v veliki meri temeljila na cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani neodvisnih strank v običajnem poteku trgovine v Republiki Koreji v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, for those product types where the domestic sales were insufficient to be considered representative or not made in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, as explained in recital (34).
Za tiste tipe izdelka, kjer domača prodaja ni bila zadostna, da bi se obravnavala kot reprezentativna, ali se ni izvajala v običajnem poteku trgovine, pa je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (34).
One exporting producer in the Republic of Korea reported sales made to Korean manufacturing companies as domestic sales, although the product was ultimately destined for export.
En proizvajalec-izvoznik v Republiki Koreji je izdelke, ki jih je prodajal korejskim proizvodnim podjetjem, navedel kot domačo prodajo, čeprav so bili v končni fazi namenjeni izvozu.
The exporting producer argued that these sales were intended for domestic consumption.
Proizvajalec-izvoznik je trdil, da je bila ta prodaja namenjena za domačo porabo.
However, these sales were subject to administrative arrangements specific to export sales as they were not subject to domestic sales tax, they were normally invoiced in US dollars and paid for by letters of credit, they were subject to duty drawback arrangements and normally classified as local export sales in the companies' accounting records.
V resnici pa je bila ta prodaja predmet upravnih dogovorov, specifičnih za izvozno prodajo, saj ni bila predmet domačih prometnih davkov, fakturirana je bila v ameriških dolarjih, plačana z akreditivi, bila je predmet dogovorov za povračilo dajatev in v računovodskih listinah družbe razvrščena kot lokalna izvozna prodaja.
Under these circumstances, and in accordance with the approach taken in the investigation mentioned in recital (2) (the ‘original investigation’), these sales were excluded for the purpose of calculating normal value for that company.
V teh okoliščinah in v skladu s pristopom, izbranim v preiskavi, omenjeni v uvodni izjavi (2) („prvotna preiskava“), je bila ta prodaja izključena iz izračuna normalne vrednosti za tisto družbo.
The same exporting producer in the Republic of Korea benefited from a national programme designed to help Korean companies in financial difficulties, the so called ‘work out programme’.
Isti proizvajalec-izvoznik v Republiki Koreji je imel korist tudi od nacionalnega programa, namenjenega pomoči korejskim družbam, ki so v finančnih težavah, imenovanega „work out programme“.
Under this programme, the company was able to transform debts into equity, accounting for a significant amount booked as an income and offsetting thus artificially the company's SG&A expenses to a large extent.
V okviru tega programa je lahko družba dolgove preoblikovala v lastniški kapital, kar ustreza precejšnjemu znesku, evidentiranemu kot dohodek, ki tako v veliki meri umetno kompenzira za stroške PS&A družbe.
It was therefore considered that this amount should not be considered as an ordinary income to be taken into account in the calculation of the SG&A.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se ta znesek ne obravnava kot običajen dohodek, ki se upošteva pri izračunu PS&A.
The reported SG&A, including the artificial income, consequently did not reasonably reflect the costs incurred in the production and sales of the like product.
Navedeni PS&A, ki je vključeval umetni dohodek, zato ni ustrezno odražal stroškov, nastalih pri proizvodnji in prodaji podobnega izdelka.
Therefore, and in accordance with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation, this amount was not taken into account in the calculation of the SG&A.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe se ta znesek ni upošteval pri izračunu PS&A.
The company also claimed a gain resulting from reversal of bad debts in the SG&A calculation.
Družba je zahtevala tudi korist od obrata slabih dolgov v izračunu PS&A.
Since these debts were not related to the product concerned and referred to benefits under the work out programme, they do not constitute an ordinary income to be taken into account in the calculation of the SG&A.
Ker ti dolgovi niso bili povezani z zadevnim izdelkom in so se nanašali na koristi v okviru nacionalnega programa „work out programme“, ne predstavljajo navadnega dohodka, ki se upošteva pri izračunu PS&A.
The company claimed that reversal of bad debts occur every year and therefore should not be excluded from the calculation.
Družba je trdila, da do obrata slabih dolgov pride vsako leto, zato naj se to ne izključi iz izračuna.
This is in contradiction with the audited reports of the company, which show that no such reversal took place over the two last financial years and that it is specifically linked to the work out programme.
To je v nasprotju z revidiranimi poročili družbe, ki kažejo, da do takšnega obrata v preteklih dveh finančnih letih ni prišlo in da je ta obrat očitno povezan z nacionalnim programom „work out programme“.
Therefore, the exclusion of this gain from the SG&A calculation is maintained.
Na podlagi tega se ta korist še naprej ne upošteva pri izračunu PS&A.
The company claimed that the adjustments to the SG&A resulted from its normal business operations and should therefore not be disregarded.
Družba je trdila, da je do sprememb v PS&A prišlo zaradi normalnega poslovanja in bi se zato morale upoštevati.
It submitted new information after the disclosure which indicated, however, that the two gains referred to in the previous recitals did not relate to the product concerned.
Po obvestilu je predložila nove podatke, ki pa so pokazali, da koristi, ki sta omenjeni v prejšnjih uvodnih izjavah, nista povezani z zadevnim izdelkom.
Furthermore, the new unverified information contradicted the information collected during the on-spot investigation and could therefore not be accepted.
Nadalje, novi nepreverjeni podatki so bili v nasprotju s podatki, zbranimi med preverjanjem na kraju samem, zato niso bili sprejeti.
On these grounds, the claims relating to the work out programme are rejected.
Na podlagi tega se zahtevki v zvezi z nacionalnim programom „work out programme“ zavrnejo.
The same exporting producer declared a high insurance income during the IP due to a fire in one of the production lines of the product concerned, which occurred before the IP.
Isti proizvajalec-izvoznik je navedel velik dohodek od zavarovanja v času OP zaradi požara v eni izmed proizvodnih linij zadevnega izdelka, ki se je zgodil pred OP.
The company deducted this income from the SG&A expenses related to the domestic sales of the product concerned.
Družba je ta dohodek odštela od stroškov PS&A, povezanih z domačo prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
On the other hand, it did not take into account the costs incurred during the IP as a result of that fire.
Po drugi strani pa ni upoštevala stroškov, ki so v času OP nastali zaradi tega požara.
SG&A expenses were therefore largely understated.
Zato so bili stroški PS&A zelo podcenjeni.
The income from the insurance was used to install a new production line not producing the product concerned anymore.
Dohodek od zavarovanja je bil porabljen za namestitev nove proizvodnje linije, ki več ne proizvaja zadevnega izdelka.
It was consequently considered that any costs and income resulting from the fire were either outside the IP or not related to the product concerned and should therefore be disregarded when calculating the SG&A for the purpose of the calculation of the normal value.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da so bili vsi stroški in dohodki, ki so nastali zaradi požara, ali izven časa OP ali pa nepovezani z zadevnim izdelkom in se jih zato ne upošteva pri izračunu PS&A za izračun normalne vrednosti.
After disclosure, this company objected to the above conclusions claiming that it had incurred costs because of a loss of business.
Po razkritju je ta družba nasprotovala zgornjim zaključkom, saj naj bi utrpela stroške zaradi izgube posla.
However, this claim was already investigated during the on-spot verification visit where the company failed to submit any supporting evidence which could show the part of the insurance income which was allegedly destined for the loss of business.
Ta zahtevek pa je že bil preučen med preverjanjem na kraju samem, kjer družba ni predložila nobenih ustreznih dokazil, ki bi prikazovala del dohodka od zavarovanja, ki naj bi bil namenjen za izgubo posla.
This claim had therefore to be rejected.
Zahtevek se zato zavrne.
One exporting producer notified that in the original investigation, the company had a related importer in the Community.
En proizvajalec je opozoril, da je imela družba v prvotni preiskavi povezanega uvoznika v Skupnosti.
The exporting producer claimed that this situation had changed, and that the importer in the Community, even if it was still existing, was not anymore related to them.
Proizvajalec-izvoznik je trdil, da se je stanje spremenilo in da uvoznik, četudi še obstaja, ni več povezan z njim.
It is to be noted that the importer accounted for a significant amount of the sales of the product concerned to the Community made by the Korean exporting producer.
Treba je opozoriti, da je uvoznik prejemal velik znesek od prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost, ki jo je izvajal korejski proizvajalec-izvoznik.