natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This was carried out by comparing each exporting producer’s export prices to the Community with the MIPs in order to establish whether or not they could be considered as having been set independently of those MIPs.
To je bilo izvedeno s primerjavo izvoznih cen vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika za Skupnost z MUC, da bi se ugotovilo, ali se te cene lahko obravnavajo kot cene, ki so bile določene neodvisno od teh MUC, ali ne.
As explained in recital (28), in cases where those prices were sufficiently above the MIPs it was concluded that they had not been influenced by the MIPs and that the prices could be used for the dumping calculation as they were reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which the exporting producer would be likely to show in the future.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (28), se je štelo, da v primerih, kjer so bile te cene v zadostni meri višje od MUC, nanje MUC ni vplival in bi bile lahko uporabljene za izračun dampinga, saj so bile zanesljiv kazalnik možne politike določanja cen, ki bi jo lahko proizvajalci izvozniki uporabljali v prihodnje.
Where it was considered that the prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, then those prices were not considered reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which the exporter would be likely to show in the future and were not used for the dumping calculation, prices to third countries being used as an alternative.
Kjer je bilo ocenjeno, da je na cene za Skupnost vplival obstoj MUC, so se te cene štele za nezanesljiv kazalnik možne politike določanja cen, ki bi jo lahko izvozniki uporabljali v prihodnje, in se niso upoštevale pri izračunu dampinga, namesto njih pa so se uporabile cene za tretje države.
The fact therefore that actual export prices of some exporters were used, while for other exporters their export prices to third countries were used, is not a discrimination of treatment between exporters.
Zato se dejstvo, da so se pri nekaterih izvoznikih upoštevale njihove dejanske izvozne cene, pri drugih izvoznikih pa njihove izvozne cene za tretje države, ne šteje za diskriminatorno obravnavanje izvoznikov.
A number of Indian exporting producers disagreed with the conclusion that their export prices to the Community were very close to the MIPs and therefore could not be used for the calculation of dumping.
Več indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je izrazilo nestrinjanje z ugotovitvijo, da so njihove izvozne cene za Skupnost zelo podobne MUC in se zato niso mogle upoštevati pri izračunu dampinga.
They considered that their prices were sufficiently above the MIPs and pointed out that under the price undertaking they were merely required not to sell below the MIPs.
Menili so, da so njihove cene v zadostni meri višje od MUC, in poudarili, da se je v skladu z zavezami glede cen od njih zahtevalo zgolj to, da ne prodajajo pod višino MUC.
One exporter argued that comparison against the MIPs was not a satisfactory basis to determine whether or not prices to the Community were reasonable and reliable, but that a comparison with the prices of other Indian exporting producers or of the Community industry would be more suitable.
En izvoznik je trdil, da primerjava z MUC ni zadostna podlaga za ugotovitev, ali so cene za Skupnost verodostojne in zanesljive ali ne, in da bi bila primerjava s cenami drugih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali cenami industrije Skupnosti ustreznejša.
In this respect, as explained in recital (30), the Community institutions found that the prices of three exporting producers were not sufficiently above the level of the MIPs so as to demonstrate that they had been set independently of the MIPs.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (30), so institucije Skupnosti v zvezi s tem ugotovile, da cene treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov niso bile nad stopnjo MUC v tolikšni meri, da bi bilo mogoče dokazati, da so bile določene neodvisno od MUC.
Therefore, such prices did not form a suitable basis for the dumping calculation.
Zato te cene niso bile primerna podlaga za izračun dampinga.
The fact that, under the price undertakings, the exporting producers were merely required not to sell below the MIPs was therefore not only not contested but irrelevant for this type of analysis.
Dejstvo, da se je v skladu z zavezami glede cen od proizvajalcev izvoznikov zahtevalo zgolj to, da ne prodajajo pod višino MUC, se zato sploh ni izpodbijalo in za tovrstno analizo nikakor ni bilo bistveno.
In the context of considering whether or not the prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, it should be noted that when undertakings are present it is necessary to consider whether or not export prices are reliable and form a proper basis for the calculation of dumping margins.
Glede presoje, ali je na cene za Skupnost vplival obstoj MUC, je treba opozoriti na to, da je pri zavezah treba upoštevati, ali so izvozne cene zanesljive in so ustrezna podlaga za izračun stopnje dampinga ali ne.
When prices to the Community are influenced by factors other than market forces, such as the undertaking MIPs, then these prices are considered as not reasonable or reliable.
Kadar na cene za Skupnost poleg tržnih sil vplivajo tudi drugi dejavniki, kot je na primer zaveza glede MUC, se te cene ne štejejo za verodostojne in zanesljive.
In this case, it must be pointed out that a comparison with the prices of each exporting producer to other third countries, as mentioned in recital (28), was considered more appropriate to determine the price-setting behaviour of a particular exporting producer, than a comparison with the prices of other Indian exporting producers or the Community industry, since it provided a better insight into the individual exporting producer's business behaviour.
V tem primeru je treba poudariti, da je bila za ugotovitev politike določanja cen določenega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjava s cenami vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika za druge tretje države, kakor je omenjena v uvodni izjavi (28), ustreznejša kot pa primerjava s cenami drugih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ali cenami industrije Skupnosti, saj je omogočila boljši vpogled v način poslovanja posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The Community industry argued that in view of the distorting effect of the undertaking MIPs, actual sales prices to the Community should have been rejected and use made instead of prices to third countries in the case of all the Indian exporting producers.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da se glede na učinek zavez glede MUC dejanske prodajne cene za Skupnost ne bi smele upoštevati in da bi se namesto njih morale uporabljati cene za tretje države v primeru vseh indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
They also expressed concern that those Indian exporting producers with low dumping margins calculated using export prices to the Community, would not continue to maintain their prices at the same level in the future.
Izrazila je tudi zaskrbljenost, da bodo tisti indijski proizvajalci izvozniki, katerih nizke stopnje dampinga so bile izračunane na osnovi izvoznih cen za Skupnost, tudi v prihodnje ohranjali svoje cene na isti ravni.
As concerns this argument, and as explained at recital (32), the same approach was adopted in respect of all Indian exporting producers.
Glede na to utemeljitev in kakor je bilo razloženo v uvodni izjavi (32), je bil za vse indijske proizvajalce izvoznike uporabljen isti pristop.
The use or non-use of each exporter's prices to the Community was based on the result of the assessment of whether or not those prices were influenced by the existence of the MIPs and on the difference between their price to the Community and export prices to third countries, as explained in recital (28).
Upoštevanje ali neupoštevanje cen vsakega izvoznika za Skupnost je temeljilo na rezultatih ocene, ali je na te cene vplival obstoj MUC ali ne, in na razliki med njihovo ceno za Skupnost in izvoznimi cenami za tretje države, kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (28).
The Community industry also maintained that the comparison on a weighted average basis of export prices with the MIPs, in order to determine whether prices to the Community were representative of future behaviour and reliable for the assessment of dumping, was contradictory to the findings of the review of the form of the measures that the MIPs were no longer appropriate.
Industrija Skupnosti je zagovarjala tudi stališče, da je primerjava na podlagi tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen z MUC, da bi se ugotovilo, ali so cene za Skupnost reprezentativne za napoved ravnanja izvoznikov v prihodnje in zanesljive za oceno dampinga, v nasprotju z ugotovitvami pregleda oblike ukrepov, tj. da MUC ni bil več ustrezen.
In this regard it is to be noted that the question under the review of the form of the anti-dumping measures was whether or not the price undertakings were still appropriate or relevant (in the sense that they would have the same effect as the imposition of an anti-dumping duty) to the products being exported under them (see recital (8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006).
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bilo vprašanje, zastavljeno v okviru pregleda oblike protidampinških ukrepov, ali so zaveze glede cen še vedno ustrezne ali smotrne (v tem smislu, da bi imele isti učinek kot uvedba protidampinške dajatve) za izdelke, ki se izvažajo v skladu z njimi (glej uvodno izjavo (8) Uredbe (ES) št. 365/2006).
In that review it was found that for some product groupings the range of actual prices to the Community had changed (either widened or narrowed) significantly from the original investigation and it was concluded that the specific MIPs based on the original prices were inappropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping in respect of current sales.
V tem pregledu je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je za nekatere skupine izdelkov razpon dejanskih cen za Skupnost občutno spremenil (povečal ali zmanjšal) v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo in da določene minimalne uvozne cene, ki temeljijo na prvotnih cenah, niso bili več primerni za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga glede na sedanjo prodajo.
Under the present review, the question was whether or not the prices to the Community were influenced by the existence of the undertaking MIPs, i.e. whether or not they are lasting.
Vprašanje v okviru sedanjega pregleda je bilo, ali je na cene v Skupnost vplival obstoj zavez glede MUC ali ne, tj. ali so te cene trajne ali ne.
It is maintained that where prices are substantially above the MIPs, those prices are not influenced by the MIPs.
Trdi se, da na tiste cene, ki so občutno višje od MUC, slednji ne vpliva.
This applies irrespective of whether price undertakings are appropriate for the product.
To velja ne glede na to, ali so zaveze glede cen ustrezne za izdelek.
In this case, the prices are therefore set by market forces and form a suitable basis for the assessment of dumping behaviour.
V tem primeru cene določajo tržne sile in ustvarjajo primerno podlago za oceno ravnanja glede dampinga.
This argument is therefore rejected.
Zato se ta utemeljitev zavrne.
Due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Razlike, ki vplivajo na ceno in primerljivost cene, so bile ustrezno popravljene v obliki prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Accordingly, adjustments were made for differences in discounts, rebates, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing, credit and commissions, where applicable and supported by verified evidence.
V skladu s tem in kjer je bilo to potrebno ter podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v popustih, rabatih, prevoznih, zavarovalniških, manipulativnih, nakladalnih in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških pakiranja, posojil ter provizij.
Adjustments to the export price were also made for some models of Ester, Garware and MTZ, as regards differences for physical characteristics of the product sold to third markets vis-à-vis the product sold to the Community, pursuant to Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Tudi pri izvoznih cenah nekaterih vrst izdelka, ki so jih prodajale družbe Ester, Garware in MTZ, so bile izvedene prilagoditve za razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih izdelka, prodanega na trge tretjih držav, v primerjavi z izdelkom, prodanim v Skupnost, v skladu s členom 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Two exporting producers claimed also, for a limited number of exports, an adjustment on the export price pursuant to Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation, based on the amount of the benefits received on exportation under the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPB) on a post-export basis.
(4 7) Proizvajalci izvozniki so za omejeno količino izvoza zahtevali tudi prilagoditev izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, kar ustreza višini ugodnosti, ki so bile dodeljene za izvoz v okviru sheme „Duty Entitlement Passbook“ (DEPB) na podlagi proizvoda.
In this respect, it was found that under this scheme, the credits received when exporting the product concerned could be used to offset customs duties due on imports of any goods or could be freely sold to other companies.
V tem smislu je bilo ugotovljeno, da se lahko v okviru te sheme posojila, prejeta ob izvozu zadevnega izdelka, uporabijo za nadomestilo carine, predpisane za uvoz kakršnega koli blaga, ali za prosto prodajo drugim družbam.
The producers did therefore not demonstrate that the benefit under the DEPB scheme on a post-export basis affected price comparability and, in particular, that the customers consistently paid different prices on the domestic market because of the DEPB benefits.
Proizvajalci zato niso dokazali, da je ugodnost v okviru sheme DEPB na podlagi proizvoda vplivala na primerljivost cen in zlasti, da so stranke na domačem trgu dosledno plačevale različne cene zaradi ugodnosti DEBP.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
Where export prices were based on prices to third countries, appropriate CIF values were calculated by increasing the ex-works price to third countries by the weighted average difference, by product type, between the ex-works and CIF level prices to the Community.
Kjer so izvozne cene temeljile na cenah za tretje države, so bile ustrezne vrednosti CIF izračunane tako, da se je ceni franko tovarna za tretje države prištela razlika v tehtanem povprečju, glede na vrsto izdelka, med izvoznimi cenami za Skupnost na ravni franko tovarna in na ravni CIF.
Given the considerable reduction of the individual dumping margins compared to the initial measures, it was also considered appropriate to modify the residual duty.
Glede na občutno znižanje individualnih stopenj dampinga v primerjavi s tistimi, ki so bile podlaga za prvotne ukrepe, se je štelo za primerno, da se spremeni preostala dajatev.
The latter was established, pursuant to Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the highest dumping margin established for the five Indian exporting producers subject to the current review, since the five companies concerned were considered to be representative of the sampled cooperating producers in terms of export volumes on which basis the initial residual duty was calculated.
Slednja je bila v skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi najvišje ugotovljene stopnje dampinga za pet indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz sedanjega pregleda, ki so bili ocenjeni za reprezentativne med vzorčenimi sodelujočimi proizvajalci, na podlagi katerih je bila izračunana prvotna preostala dajatev.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are as follows:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek vrednosti CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, so:
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, an analysis was made as to whether the change in circumstances with regard to dumping could reasonably be said to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je bila narejena analiza, da se ugotovi, ali se sprememba okoliščin glede dampinga lahko utemeljeno šteje za trajno.
In this regard, it should be noted that normal value was established on the basis of the applicants' costs and prices.
V tem smislu je treba opomniti, da je bila normalna vrednost določena na podlagi stroškov in cen vložnika.
The exporters have a substantial domestic market for the product concerned, and domestic prices have increased in comparison with the original investigation.
Izvozniki imajo velik domači trg za zadevni izdelek in domače cene so višje, kot so bile med prvotno preiskavo.
No indications could be found that the normal value established during the present review could not be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Nobena ugotovitev ne opozarja na to, da bi normalna vrednost, določena med sedanjo preiskavo, ne bila trajne narave.
It could be argued that the evolution of the prices of the raw materials, highly correlated to the oil prices, could have a significant influence on the normal value.
Lahko bi trdili, da lahko razvoj cen surovin, tesno povezanih s cenami nafte, pomembno vpliva na normalno vrednost.
It was however considered that since the raw materials are commodities for which the price is internationally determined, the effect of the price increase would affect all actors on the market and therefore have an impact on both the normal value and the export price.
Vendar pa se je glede na to, da so materiali bazični proizvodi, katerih cena je določena na mednarodni ravni, upoštevalo, da bo povišanje cen vplivalo na vse udeležence na trgu in s tem tudi na normalno vrednost ter izvozno ceno.
As already mentioned in recitals (22) and (23), given the existence of undertakings, in order to examine whether export prices to the Community could be considered to be of a lasting nature or not, the latter needed to be analysed in relation to the MIPs set in the undertakings.
Kakor je bilo omenjeno že v uvodnih izjavah (22) in (23), je bilo treba glede na obstoj zavez in z namenom, da bi se preučilo, ali bi se izvozne cene za Skupnost lahko štele za trajne ali ne, narediti analizo slednjih glede na MUC, določene v zavezah.
In addition, a price comparison was made between the prices of the product concerned sold for export to the Community and for export to third countries during the investigation period.
Ravno tako je bila narejena primerjava med cenami zadevnega izdelka, prodanega za izvoz v Skupnost, in cenami zadevnega izdelka, namenjenega za izvoz v tretje države, med obdobjem preiskave.
As explained in recital (23), it was considered that when export prices to the Community were not sufficiently above the MIPs and were significantly above export prices to third countries, the former were not considered to be a reliable indication of the price-setting behaviour which exporters would be likely to show in the future.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (23), se je štelo, da v primeru, ko izvozne cene za Skupnost niso bile znatno višje od MUC in so bile občutno višje od izvoznih cen za tretje države, prve niso bile zanesljiv kazalnik možne politike določanja cen, ki bi jo lahko izvozniki uporabljali v prihodnosti.
Instead, export prices to third countries were used in order to determine future export prices that could be considered as lasting.
Namesto tega so se za določitev prihodnjih izvoznih cen, ki bi se lahko štele za trajne, upoštevale izvozne cene za tretje države.
On that basis, it is concluded that the changed circumstances with respect to the original investigation regarding dumping could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature, with the particularity that for three Indian exporters, as concluded in recital (26), the lasting change in circumstances regarding their dumping behaviour, in particular regarding export prices, had to be established on the basis of prices actually paid or payable to other third countries for those models sold to the Community rather than on the basis of their export price to the Community.
Na podlagi tega se sklene, da se lahko spremenjene okoliščine glede na osnovno preiskavo v zvezi z dampingom utemeljeno štejejo za trajne, s tem pridržkom, da je bilo treba za tri indijske izvoznike, kakor je sklenjeno že v uvodni izjavi (26), trajno spremembo okoliščin v zvezi z njihovim ravnanjem glede dampinga, zlasti glede izvoznih cen, določiti na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih cen za ostale tretje države za vrste izdelka, prodanega v Skupnost, in ne na podlagi njihovih izvoznih cen za Skupnost.
The considerable reduction of the individual dumping margins of the companies in the sample, as compared to the initial measures, and the lasting nature thereof, can be considered to be representative for all other companies as well.
Občutno znižane individualne stopnje dampinga vzorčenih družb v primerjavi z začetnimi ukrepi in njihova trajna narava so lahko reprezentativni tudi za vse ostale družbe.
Therefore, the residual duty had to be modified accordingly, as explained in recital (30).
Zato je treba preostalo dajatev ustrezno spremeniti, kakor je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (30).
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping and the lasting nature of the changed circumstances, and having regard to the conclusions of Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 as regards the form of the anti-dumping measures (withdrawal of the undertakings in force), the anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in India, should be amended in order to reflect the new dumping margins found.
Ob upoštevanju sklepnih ugotovitev v zvezi z dampingom in trajno naravo spremenjenih okoliščin ter glede na sklepne ugotovitve Uredbe (ES) št. 365/2006 v zvezi z obliko protidampinških ukrepov (odprava veljavnih zavez) je treba protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije spremeniti, da bodo v skladu z novimi ugotovljenimi stopnjami dampinga.
Since, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation, no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from export subsidisation, the countervailing duty in force that corresponds to export subsidies was deducted from the anti-dumping duty to be applied.
V skladu s členom 14(1) osnovne uredbe se za noben izdelek ne smejo uporabljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za namene obravnavanja enih in istih okoliščin, ki so posledica dampinga ali subvencioniranega izvoza, zato se je veljavna izravnalna dajatev, ki ustreza izvoznim subvencijam, odštela od protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja.
For the residual duty, the deduction corresponds to the export subsidy margin of the company on the basis of which the residual dumping margin was established.
Pri preostali dajatvi odbitek ustreza stopnji izvozne subvencije družbe, na podlagi katere je bila določena preostala stopnja dampinga.
On the basis of the above, and taking into account the findings of the expiry review of the definitive countervailing duties (Regulation (EC) No 367/2006), the proposed duty amounts, expressed on the CIF Community border price, customs duty unpaid, are as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ob upoštevanju ugotovitev pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev (Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006) so predlagani zneski dajatev, izraženi kot cena CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane carinske dajatve, naslednji:
Export Subsidy Margin
Stopnja izvozne subvencije
Total Subsidy Margin
Stopnja celotne subvencije
CVD duty
Izravnal-na dajatev
AD duty
Protidam-pinška dajatev
Total duty rate
Skupna stopnja dajatve