natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The review was limited in scope to the examination of dumping by the five Indian exporting producers from which undertakings were accepted and to the level of the residual duty, in order to assess the need for the continuation, removal or amendment of the level of the existing measures.
Pregled se je omejil na preučitev dampinga petih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerih zaveze so bile sprejete, in na raven preostale dajatve, da bi se ocenila potreba po nadaljevanju, odpravi ali spremembi stopnje obstoječih ukrepov.
The investigation period was from 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004.
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. oktobra 2003 do 30. septembra 2004.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers of the initiation of the partial interim review.
Komisija je proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike države izvoznice in proizvajalce Skupnosti uradno obvestila o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers concerned, which all cooperated by replying to the questionnaire.
Za pridobitev informacij, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za njeno preiskavo, je Komisija poslala vprašalnike zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so sodelovali in izpolnili vprašalnik.
As in the original investigation, it was found that PET film produced and sold on the domestic market in India and PET film exported to the Community from India have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and uses.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno že v prvotni preiskavi, imata folija iz PET, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v Indiji, ter folija iz PET, ki se izvaža v Skupnost iz Indije, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
Therefore, they are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejeta za podobna izdelka.
In order to establish normal value, it was first verified that the total domestic sales of each of the exporting producers were representative in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, i.e. that they accounted for 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Da bi določili normalno vrednost, se je najprej preverilo, ali je bila skupna domača prodaja proizvajalcev izvoznikov reprezentativna v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe, tj. ali predstavlja 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost.
For all companies, overall sales were found to be representative.
Skupna prodaja je bila v vseh družbah reprezentativna.
It was then ascertained whether total domestic sales of each product type constituted 5 % or more of the sales volume of the same type exported to the Community.
Potem se je ugotavljalo, ali je skupna domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka predstavljala 5 % ali več obsega prodaje iste vrste, izvožene v Skupnost.
For two companies it was found that they sold second grade film on the domestic market but not to the Community.
Za dve družbi je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta prodajali drugorazredno folijo na domačem trgu, ne pa tudi v Skupnost.
Since second grade film is not directly comparable to first grade film, sales of second grade film were excluded from the calculation of normal value.
Ker drugorazredna folija ni neposredno primerljiva s prvorazredno folijo, se prodaja drugorazredne folije ni upoštevala pri izračunu normalne vrednosti.
Another company sold three different grades of film on the domestic market but only the best quality film to the Community.
Neka druga družba je na domačem trgu prodajala tri različno kakovostne vrste folije, v Skupnost pa samo prvorazredno folijo.
In selling the three grades of film, the company often sold the first and second grade films en masse with third grade film but all at the price of the third grade film.
Ta družba je tri vrste folije pogosto prodajala tako, da je prvo- in drugorazredne folije prodajala v velikih količinah skupaj s tretjerazredno folijo, vse pa po ceni tretjerazredne folije.
This was explained as being a form of stock clearance.
To je bilo utemeljeno z razlago, da gre za obliko razprodaje zalog.
Again, these sales were excluded from the calculation.
Tudi tukaj se prodaja ni upoštevala pri izračunu.
One company sold to traders on the domestic market goods which were destined for export.
Ena družba je trgovcem na domačem trgu prodajala blago, ki je bilo namenjeno za izvoz.
The goods were readily identifiable as being destined for export, as they were subject to a different tax regime from normal sales on the domestic market.
To blago je bilo zlahka prepoznavno kot blago, namenjeno za izvoz, saj je zanj veljal drugačen davčni režim kot za normalno prodajo na domačem trgu.
The company could not indicate whether the final destination of the goods would be the Community or a third country.
Družba ni mogla navesti, ali je bil namembni kraj blaga Skupnost ali tretja država.
These sales were therefore excluded from the calculation.
Ta prodaja se zato ni upoštevala pri izračunu.
For those product types where domestic sales constituted 5 % or more of the sales volume of the same type exported to the Community, it was then examined whether sufficient sales had been made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, kjer je domača prodaja predstavljala 5 % ali več obsega prodaje iste vrste izdelka, izvožene v Skupnost, se je potem preverilo, ali je bila zadostna količina prodana v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
For each product type where the volume of domestic sales made at a net sales price equal to or above the cost of production represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was established on the basis of the weighted average price actually paid for all domestic sales of that type, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Za vse vrste izdelka, katerih obseg domače prodaje po neto prodajni ceni, ki je bila enaka proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, je predstavljal več kakor 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje in katerih tehtana povprečna cena je bila enaka proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, je normalna vrednost temeljila na tehtanem povprečju dejansko plačanih cen za vso domačo prodajo navedene vrste, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
For those product types where the volume of profitable sales was equal to or lower than 80 %, but not lower than 10 % of sales, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the weighted average price actually paid for the profitable domestic sales of that type only.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, katerih obseg dobičkonosne prodaje je bil 80 % ali manj, vendar ne manj kot 10 % prodaje, ali katerih tehtana povprečna cena te vrste izdelka je bila nižja od stroškov prodaje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na tehtanem povprečju dejansko plačanih cen zgolj dobičkonosne domače prodaje te vrste izdelka.
For the product types where domestic prices of the exporting producers could not be used to establish normal value owing to insufficient representativity or to a lack of sufficient sales in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was constructed on the basis of the manufacturing costs of the product types exported to the Community incurred by the exporting producers concerned plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A costs) and for profits, in accordance with Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelka, pri katerih domačih cen proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bilo mogoče uporabiti za določitev normalne vrednosti zaradi nezadostne reprezentativnosti ali pomanjkanja zadostne prodaje v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, je bila normalna vrednost oblikovana na podlagi stroškov izdelave vrst izdelka, izvoženih v Skupnost, ki so jih imeli zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki, ter razumnega zneska za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA stroški“) in za dobiček, v skladu s členom 2(3) in (6) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation the SG&A costs were based on such costs incurred by the exporting producers with regard to their domestic sales of the product concerned, which were found to be representative.
V skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe so PSA stroški temeljili na stroških, ki so jih imeli proizvajalci izvozniki pri svoji domači prodaji zadevnega izdelka in so bili reprezentativni.
The profit margin was calculated on the basis of the weighted average profit margin of each company for those product types sold on the domestic market in sufficient quantities in the ordinary course of trade.
Stopnja dobička je bila izračunana na podlagi tehtanega povprečja stopnje dobička vsake družbe za tiste vrste izdelka, ki so bile prodane na domačem trgu v zadostnih količinah v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja.
Following disclosure, one exporting producer contested the adjustment made to the price paid in respect of one specific raw material.
Na podlagi razkritja je en proizvajalec izvoznik ugovarjal prilagoditvi cene, ki jo je bilo treba plačati za neko določeno surovino.
The contested adjustment was re-examined, following which the level of adjustment was revised and the dumping margin recalculated accordingly.
Sporna prilagoditev je bila ponovno preučena, stopnja prilagoditve pa je bila nato popravljena in stopnja dampinga v skladu s tem ponovno izračunana.
Another company argued that film which was not of top-quality should be included in the calculation and that ‘adjustments’ should be made in order to make that film comparable at the level of first grade film.
Neka druga družba je trdila, da bi se morala folija, ki ni najboljše kakovosti, upoštevati pri izračunu in da bi zato bile potrebne „prilagoditve“, na podlagi katerih bi ta folija postala primerljiva s prvovrstno folijo.
It was also argued that further to the inclusion of these transactions a re-calculation of the profit margin would be necessary.
Trdila je tudi, da bi bilo zaradi upoštevanja teh transakcij potrebno ponovno izračunati stopnje dobička.
The volume of second and third grade film excluded from the calculation represented less than 3 % of all domestic sales.
Obseg drugo- in tretjerazredne folije, ki se nista upoštevali pri izračunu, predstavlja manj kot 3 % celotne domače prodaje.
As such, it is considered that the remaining domestic transactions are sufficiently representative for an accurate calculation of normal value.
Preostale domače transakcije so, kot take, dovolj reprezentativne za natančen izračun normalne vrednosti.
No re-calculation of the profit margin is therefore required.
Zato ponoven izračun stopnje dobička ni potreben.
The exporting producers received disclosure of the calculations and submitted certain comments.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so prejeli obvestilo o izračunu in predložili določene pripombe.
The Commission took into account those comments and, to the extent that they were found to be justified, adjusted the calculations accordingly.
Komisija je te pripombe preučila in ustrezno prilagodila izračune, v kolikor je presodila, da so pripombe upravičene.
As regards the determination of export prices, it should be recalled that the present investigation seeks to establish whether the levels of dumping have changed and whether these changes can be considered to be of a lasting nature.
Glede določitve izvoznih cen je treba opomniti, da želi sedanja preiskava ugotoviti, ali so se stopnje dampinga spremenile in ali bi lahko bile te spremembe trajne.
In that context, the determination of export prices cannot be limited to an examination of exporters' past behaviour, but has to examine also the likely development of export prices in the future.
V tem smislu določitev izvoznih cen ne more biti omejena na preučitev preteklega ravnanja izvoznikov, temveč mora preučiti tudi možen razvoj izvoznih cen v prihodnosti.
In this case, and in view of the fact that undertakings were accepted, it was examined in particular whether the existence of such undertakings has influenced the past export prices, so as to make them unreliable for the establishment of future export behaviour.
V tem primeru in glede na dejstvo, da so bile zaveze sprejete, je bilo preučeno predvsem to, ali je obstoj takšnih zavez vplival na pretekle izvozne cene na tak način, da so postale nezanesljiva podlaga za določitev gibanja prihodnjih izvoznih cen.
In order to examine whether export prices to the Community were reliable and given the existence of undertakings, export prices to the Community were analysed in relation to the minimum import prices (MIPs) of the undertakings.
Glede na obstoj zavez in da bi se preučilo, ali so bile izvozne cene za Skupnost zanesljive, je bila narejena analiza izvoznih cen za Skupnost glede na minimalne uvozne cene (MUC) zavez.
It was in fact necessary to ascertain whether export prices to the Community were set at a certain level mainly as the effect of the existence of the MIPs established by the undertakings and therefore whether they were sustainable or not.
Dejansko je bilo treba ugotoviti, ali so bile stopnje izvoznih cen v Skupnost oblikovane predvsem zaradi obstoja MUC, določenega z zavezami, in ali so bile zato trajnostne ali ne.
It was therefore considered, on a weighted average basis at the level of each company, whether the prices practised for sales to the Community market were substantially above the MIPs or not, taking into consideration the particularities of the product concerned and the markets on which it was being sold during the IP, and how these prices related to prices for exports to third countries.
Zato se je na osnovi tehtanega povprečja za vsako posamezno družbo preverilo, ali so bile cene prodaje na trg Skupnosti znatno višje od MUC ali ne, ob upoštevanju posebnosti zadevnega izdelka in trgov, na katerih se je prodajal med OP, ter zveze med temi cenami in cenami za izvoz v tretje države.
When export prices to the Community were on average well above the MIPs at company level, it was considered that these export prices were set sufficiently independently from the undertakings, and therefore reliable as an indication of the price-setting behaviour which exporters would be likely to show in the future.
Kjer so bile izvozne cene za Skupnost v povprečju precej višje od MUC v posamezni družbi, se je štelo, da so bile te izvozne cene določene sorazmerno neodvisno od zavez in so bile zato zanesljiv kazalnik možne politike določanja cen, ki bi jo lahko izvozniki uporabljali v prihodnosti.
On the contrary, when export prices to the Community were on average not sufficiently above the MIPs and in addition significantly above export prices to third countries, the former were considered to be influenced by the undertakings and therefore not reliable enough to be used for the dumping calculation, pursuant to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, in the context of an interim review.
Kjer pa izvozne cene za Skupnost v povprečju niso bile znatno višje od MUC, hkrati pa so bile občutno višje od izvoznih cen za tretje države, se je štelo, da so na prve vplivale zaveze in zato niso bile dovolj zanesljive, da bi se lahko v okviru vmesnega pregleda upoštevale pri izračunu dampinga v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
For two Indian exporters, Flex and Polyplex, it was found that their export prices to the Community were substantially above the MIPs.
Za dva indijska izvoznika, Flex in Polyplex, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile njune izvozne cene za Skupnost znatno višje od MUC.
Therefore, these export prices to the Community were considered as reliable and were used in the dumping calculations.
Zato so bile te izvozne cene za Skupnost ocenjene za zanesljive in so se upoštevale pri izračunu dampinga.
For the other three exporting producers, Ester, Garware and MTZ, it was found that the export prices to the Community were very close to the MIPs.
Za ostale tri proizvajalce izvoznike, Ester, Garware in MTZ, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile izvozne cene za Skupnost zelo blizu MUC.
Moreover, it was also found that the export prices of these three companies to other third countries were, when considered on a type by type basis, considerably below the prices to the Community, thus making it likely that, in the absence of undertakings such prices to the Community would be aligned to the prices made for the same types to other third countries.
Poleg tega je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da so bile izvozne cene teh treh družb za tretje države, obravnavane po vrsti izdelka, občutno nižje od cen za Skupnost, zaradi česar obstaja verjetnost, da se bodo takšne cene za Skupnost brez obstoja kakršnih koli zavez poenotile s cenami za enake vrste izdelka za tretje države.
It was therefore concluded that the export prices of these three companies to the Community could not be used to establish reliable export prices in the meaning of Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, in the context of the present interim review.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se v okviru sedanjega vmesnega pregleda izvozne cene teh treh družb za Skupnost ne morejo upoštevati pri določanju zanesljivih izvoznih cen v smislu člena 2(8) osnovne uredbe.
It was considered, however, that the absence of a reliable price for these three Indian exporters, due to the existence of the undertakings in this case, should not lead to the termination of the review for these exporters, if a lasting change in circumstances regarding their dumping behaviour, in particular regarding export prices, could nevertheless be otherwise established.
Kljub temu pa se je štelo, da odsotnost zanesljive cene za te tri indijske izvoznike, zaradi obstoja zavez v tem primeru, ne sme imeti za posledico zaključka pregleda, če se lahko trajna sprememba okoliščin v zvezi z njihovim ravnanjem glede dampinga, zlasti v zvezi z izvoznimi cenami, ugotovi tudi na drugačen način.
To this end and, given that the exporting producers were selling the product concerned on the world market, it was decided to establish the export price on the basis of prices actually paid or payable to all third countries for those models sold to the Community.
V ta namen in glede na to, da so proizvajalci izvozniki prodajali zadevni izdelek na svetovnem trgu, je bilo sklenjeno, da se izvozna cena določi na osnovi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih cen za vse tretje države, in sicer za vrste, prodane v Skupnost.
Following disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose an amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, a number of parties came forward with comments.
Po razkritju osnovnih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je nameravala biti predlagana sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, je več strank izrazilo pripombe.
A number of Indian exporting producers and the Indian Government maintained that no legal basis existed under Articles 2(8) or 2(9) of the basic Regulation for basing export prices on those to third countries.
Več indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in indijska vlada so trdili, da v skladu s členom 2(8) ali 2(9) osnovne uredbe ne obstaja nobena pravna podlaga za to, da bi izvozne cene temeljile na cenah, ki veljajo za tretje države.
They argued that export prices to the Community existed and that it was not satisfactorily demonstrated that there was a sufficient basis to reject the use of those export prices.
Trdili so, da so izvozne cene za Skupnost že obstajale in da razlog za zavrnitev teh izvoznih cen ni bil utemeljen v zadostni meri.
They maintained that the export prices to the Community were reliable and that they should be used instead of prices to third countries.
Vztrajali so pri svojem stališču, da so izvozne cene za Skupnost zanesljive in bi jih bilo treba upoštevati namesto cen za tretje države.
In respect of the use of export prices to third countries, it must be stated that the purpose of this review under Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation is to determine whether the continued imposition of the measures is still necessary to offset dumping.
Glede upoštevanja izvoznih cen za tretje države je treba poudariti, da je v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe namen tega pregleda ugotoviti, ali je nadaljnje izvajanje ukrepov za preprečevanje dampinga še vedno potrebno.
In examining the level of dumping of the exporters concerned, it is necessary to examine the change in the level of dumping compared to the original findings on dumping.
Pri preučitvi stopnje dampinga za zadevne izvoznike je treba preveriti spremembo stopnje dampinga v primerjavi s prvotnimi ugotovitvami o dampingu.
It should be noted that the use of the prices to third countries rather than those to the Community in the case of three Indian exporting producers is not based on the application of Articles 2(8) and 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Opozoriti je treba, da v primeru treh indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov upoštevanje cen za tretje države namesto cen za Skupnost ne temelji na uporabi člena 2(8) in 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
As explained in recitals (27) and (28), this is justified by the need to assess the likelihood of those prices to the Community being maintained in the future and, consequently, the likelihood of recurrence of dumping.
Kakor je razloženo v uvodnih izjavah (27) in (28), je to utemeljeno s potrebo po tem, da se oceni, kakšna je verjetnost, da se te cene za Skupnost ohranijo v prihodnje in posledično, kakšna je verjetnost ponovnega pojava dampinga.
The conclusion drawn from this assessment was that, in the case of three Indian exporting producers, their prices to the Community had been influenced by the existence of the MIPs, since they were set very close to the MIPs.
Sklep, ki izhaja iz te ocene je ta, da je v primeru treh indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov na njihove cene za Skupnost vplival obstoj MUC, saj med njimi ni bilo velike razlike.
Thus, they were not a result of only market forces and were unlikely to be maintained at the same level into the future.
Torej niso bile posledica delovanja zgolj tržnih sil in ni bilo verjetno, da se bodo v prihodnje ohranile na isti stopnji.
Consequently, it was considered that there were no prices to the Community which could be used for the calculation of dumping.
Zato se je štelo, da se za izračun dampinga ne more upoštevati nobena cena za Skupnost.
In the absence of an export price to the Community, it was considered that prices to third countries formed an accurate and reasonable alternative basis for the establishment of export prices during the investigation period and for the calculation of dumping.
Zaradi neobstoja izvozne cene za Skupnost se je štelo, da lahko cene za tretje države verodostojno in smiselno nadomestijo osnovo za določitev izvoznih cen med obdobjem preiskave in se uporabijo za izračun dampinga.
One Indian exporting producer argued that the rejection of its sales prices to the Community and the use of its prices to third countries constituted discrimination in that it was treated differently from those exporters for which their actual sales prices to the Community were used.
En indijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je neupoštevanje njegovih prodajnih cen za Skupnost in uporaba njegovih cen za tretje države diskriminatorno ravnanje, in sicer v tem smislu, da je bil obravnavan na drugačen način kot tisti izvozniki, katerih dejanske prodajne cene za Skupnost so bile upoštevane.
In this respect, it should be noted that no discrimination occurred in establishing export prices since the same approach was taken in respect of all Indian exporters.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da pri določanju izvoznih cen ni prišlo do diskriminacije, saj je bil za vse indijske izvoznike uporabljen isti pristop.
In respect of each exporting producer, the existence of suitable export prices to the Community for the purpose of the calculation of dumping was assessed.
Za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika je bilo ocenjeno, ali obstajajo ustrezne izvozne cene za Skupnost za izračun dampinga.