natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a consequence, these printers would be able to meet the time-constraints in the printing of magazines at least when using the sites closest to the German border.
Posledično bi ti tiskarji lahko, vsaj z uporabo krajev tiskanja v bližini nemške meje, upoštevali časovne omejitve tiskanja revij.
The differences in the distribution system and in the methods of finishing would require some adjustment of the foreign printers and close cooperation with German clients.
Razlike v distribucijskem sistemu in zaključnih metodah bi potrebovale določeno prilagoditev tujih tiskarjev in tesno sodelovanje z nemškimi strankami.
The example of RotoSmeets who currently is the only foreign printer who prints a German magazine shows that this adaptation process is possible.
Primer Roto Smeets, ki je trenutno edini tuj tiskar, ki tiska nemško revijo, kaže, da je ta prilagoditveni postopek mogoč.
RotoSmeets, Quebecor and Mondadori have currently at least 32 kt of free capacity which they could readily dedicate to German magazine publishers.
RotoSmeets, Quebecor in Mondadori imajo trenutno najmanj 32 kt proste zmogljivosti, ki bi jo lahko namenili založnikom nemških revij.
Additional capacity could be provided shortly following planned capacity extensions and shifts in the production mix.
Dodatna zmogljivost bi bila lahko kmalu zagotovljena, če bi sledili načrtovanemu povečanju zmogljivosti in preusmeritvam v mešano proizvodnjo.
Further competitive harm, apart from capacity considerations, could theoretically arise from the elimination of a competitor by the concentration.
Nadaljnja konkurenčna škoda bi, poleg upoštevanja zmogljivosti, lahko teoretično nastala, če bi koncentracija izločila konkurenta.
The concentration will remove Springer as an independent competitor.
Koncentracija bo odstranila Springerja kot neodvisnega konkurenta.
However, even if only the German rotogravure printers are considered, customers can still turn to three other significant players Schlott, TSB and Burda with a large installed capacity.
Vendar tudi če so upoštevane samo nemške rotacije za globoki tisk, se lahko stranke še vedno obrnejo na druge tri pomembne akterje Schlott, TSB in Burdo, ki imajo veliko obstoječo zmogljivost.
In addition credible potential competitors as mentioned above can enter the market.
Poleg tega, kot je zgoraj navedeno, lahko verodostojni potencialni konkurenti stopijo na trg.
On the basis of the above calculations, the three most important German competitors, namely Schlott, TSB and Burda, would be able to offer approximately additional 197 kt (17 kt spare capacity, 130 kt production shifting, 50 kt net capacity extension) for magazine printing in response to a potential price increase for the printing of German magazines while the Parties’ merchant market volume equals [100-150 kt] [4] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Na osnovi zgoraj navedenih izračunov bi trije najpomembnejši nemški konkurenti, in sicer Schlott, TSB in Burda lahko ponudili približno dodatnih 197 kt (17 kt dodatnih zmogljivosti, 120 kt preusmeritev zmogljivosti, 50 kt povečanja neto zmogljivosti) za tiskanje nemških revij, medtem ko količina, ki jo proizvedejo stranke na prodajnem trgu znaša [100–150 kt] [4] Deli tega besedila so bili prilagojeni, da zaupni podatki ne bi bili razkriti; ti deli so navedeni v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
Moreover, RotoSmeets, Quebecor and Mondadori can be considered as credible potential competitors to which German magazine customers could turn if the joint venture should undertake to raise prices.
RotoSmeets, Quebecor in Mondadori se lahko štejejo za verodostojne potencialne konkurente na katere se lahko naročniki nemških revij obrnejo, če bi skupno podjetje dvignilo cene.
Coordination on the market for magazine publishing
Usklajevanje na trgu za objavo revij
The Commission also assessed under Article 2(4) of the Merger Regulation whether the creation of the joint venture would lead to the coordination of the competitive behaviour of Bertelsmann (including G+J) and Springer’s competitive behaviour on the downstream market for magazine publishing.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(4) Uredbe o združitvah ocenila, ali bi nastanek skupnega podjetja vodil v usklajevanje konkurenčnega obnašanja Bertelsmanna (vključno z G+J) in konkurenčnega obnašanja Springerja na prodajnem trgu za objavo revij.
In view of the comparatively low part of printing costs in the total costs of a magazine and in view of the pre-eminent importance of the Parties’ magazine publishing business as compared to their rotogravure printing business, the Commission concluded that coordination in magazine publishing was not likely.
Ob upoštevanju razmeroma nizkega dela stroškov tiskanja v skupnih stroških za revijo in ob upoštevanju, da je posel založništva revij, v primerjavi s poslom globokega tiska, za stranke najpomembnejši, je Komisija zaključila, da usklajevanje na trgu za objavo revij ni bilo verjetno.
For the reasons set out above, the Commission concluded that the proposed concentration does not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it, in particular as a result of the creation or strengthening of a dominant position, and that it does not restrict competition within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Merger Regulation and Article 81 of the Treaty.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih razlogov je Komisija zaključila, da predlagana koncentracija ne ovira bistveno učinkovite konkurence na skupnem trgu ali na njegovem znatnem delu, zlasti kot posledica nastanka ali krepitve prevladujočega položaja in ne omejuje konkurence v smislu člena 2(4) Uredbe o združitvah in člena 81 Pogodbe ES.
The concentration is therefore to be declared compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Merger Regulation and with the EEA Agreement pursuant to Article 57 thereof.
Koncentracija se zato razglasi za združljivo s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 8(1) Uredbe o združitvah in členom 57 Sporazuma EGP.
OJ C 52, 2.3.2006, p. 2.
UL C 52, 2.3.2006, str. 2.
OJ C 52, 2.3.2006, p. 3.
UL C 52, 2.3.2006, str. 3.
Even on a hypothetical national German market for catalogues and/or advertisements the joint venture would reach market shares between 22 % and 35 % but would be smaller than the leader on these markets, Schlott.
Tudi na hipotetičnem nemškem nacionalnem trgu za kataloge in/ali oglase bi skupno podjetje doseglo tržni delež med 22 % in 35 %, ki bi vendar bil manjši od deleža vodilnega na teh trgih, Schlotta.
For Bertelsmann’s rotogravure printing activities remaining outside the joint venture, an additional [0-5] % [4] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Za Bertelsmannove dejavnosti globokega tiska, ki ostajajo zunaj skupnega podjetja, mora biti dodanih [0–5] % [4] Deli tega besedila so bili prilagojeni, da zaupni podatki ne bi bili razkriti; ti deli so navedeni v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
have to be added to each of these market shares.
na vsakega od teh tržnih deležov.
Planned capacity extensions: The parties’ three main competitors in Germany, Schlott, TSB and Burda, are planning to increase their net capacity by at least 50kt over the next two to three years.
Načrtovano povečanje zmogljivosti: trije največji konkurenti strank v Nemčiji Schlott, TSB in Burda načrtujejo povečanje svoje neto zmogljivosti do vsaj 50 kt v naslednjih dveh do treh letih.
In addition, they could further increase their net capacity, at least on a temporary basis, in deferring the planned gradual dismantlement of older but still operative presses.
Poleg tega bi lahko še nadalje povečali svojo neto zmogljivost, vsaj začasno, z odložitvijo načrtovane postopne odstranitve starejših, vendar še vedno delujočih tiskarskih strojev.
Imports account for [0-5] % [4] Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk. , which are to a very considerable extent supplied by Burda’s printing facilities in Vieux-Thann/France and Bratislava/Slovakia.
Uvozi, ki jih v znatnem obsegu prispevajo Burdini tiskarski obrati v Vieux-Thann/Francija in Bratislavi/Slovaška, znašajo [0–5] % [4] Deli tega besedila so bili prilagojeni, da zaupni podatki ne bi bili razkriti; ti deli so navedeni v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico. .
Council Decision 2006/172/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2006/172/SZVP
of 27 February 2006
z dne 27. februarja 2006
implementing Common Position 2004/852/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire
o izvajanju Skupnega stališča 2004/852/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Slonokoščeni obali
Having regard to Common Position 2004/852/CFSP of 13 December 2004 [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof, in conjunction with Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča 2004/852/SZVP z dne 13. decembra 2004 [1] in zlasti člena 6 Skupnega stališča v povezavi s členom 23(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
On 13 December 2004 the Council adopted Common Position 2004/852/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire in order to implement the measures imposed by the United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSC) 1572 (2004), hereinafter referred to as ‘UNSCR 1572 (2004)’, against Côte d'Ivoire.
Svet je 13. decembra 2004 sprejel Skupno stališče 2004/852/SZVP o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Slonokoščeni obali z namenom izvajanja ukrepov, uvedenih proti Slonokoščeni obali z Resolucijo Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov VSZN 1572 (2004), v nadaljnjem besedilu „VSZN 1572 (2004)“.
On 7 February 2006 the Committee established by paragraph 14 of UNSCR 1572 (2004) approved the list of individuals subject to the measures imposed by paragraphs 9 and 11 of UNSCR 1572 (2004) and renewed by paragraph 1 of UNSC Resolution 1643 (2005).
Odbor, ustanovljen na podlagi člena 14 VSZN 1572 (2004), je dne 7. februarja 2006 odobril seznam oseb, za katere veljajo ukrepi, ki jih uvajajo odstavki od 9 do 11 VSZN 1572 (2004) in katerih veljavnost je bila podaljšana z odstavkom 1 Resolucije VSZN 1643 (2005).
The Annex to Common Position 2004/852/CFSP should be completed accordingly,
Prilogo k Skupnemu stališču 2004/852/SZVP je treba ustrezno temu dopolniti –
The list of persons set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be inserted in the Annex to Common Position 2004/852/CFSP.
Seznam oseb iz priloge tega sklepa se vstavi v prilogo Skupnega stališča 2004/852/SZVP.
Done at Brussels, 27 February 2006.
V Bruslju, 27. februarja 2006
Common Position as last amended by Common Position 2006/30/CFSP (OJ L 19, 24.1.2006, p. 36).
Skupno stališče, kakor je bilo nazadnje spremenjeno s Skupnim stališčem 2006/30/SZVP (UL L 19, 24.1.2006, str. 36).
Surname, First Name: BLÉ GOUDÉ, Charles
Priimek in ime: BLÉ GOUDÉ, Charles
Function: Leader of COJEP (“Young Patriots”)
Funkcija: vodja COJEP (‚Mladi patrioti‘),
Date of birth: 1.1.1972
Datum rojstva: 1.1.1972
Passport or ID Number: PD.
Številka potnega lista ali osebne izkaznice: PD.
Nationality: Ivorian
Državljanstvo: Slonokoščene obale
Surname, First Name: DJUÉ, Eugène Ngoran Kouadio
Priimek in ime: DJUÉ, Eugène Ngoran Kouadio
Date of birth: 20.12.1969 or 1.1.1966
Datum rojstva: 20.12.1969 ali 1.1.1966
Surname, First Name: FOFIE, Martin Kouakou
Priimek in ime: FOFIE, Martin Kouakou
Function: Chief Corporal New Force Commandant, Korhogo Sector
Funkcija: poveljujoči naddesetnik ‚Forces Nouvelles‘ na območju Korhogo
Date of birth: 1.1.1968
Datum rojstva: 1.1.1968
Nationality: Ivorian’
Državljanstvo: Slonokoščene obale.“
repealing Decision 2001/645/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating, inter alia, in India
o razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2001/645/ES o sprejetju zavez, ponujenih v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom glede uvoza folije iz polietilen tereftalata s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (the basic Regulation) [1], and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti („osnovna uredba“) [1], in zlasti členov 8 in 9 Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [2], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1676/2001 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 0 and 62,6 % on imports of PET film originating in India.
Ukrepi na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini od 0 % do 62,6 %.
On 22 August 2001, the Commission, by Decision 2001/645/EC [3], accepted undertakings offered by five Indian producers: Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Flex Industries Limited (Flex), Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), MTZ Polyfilms Limited (MTZ) and Polyplex Corporation Limited (Polyplex).
Komisija je 22. avgusta 2001 s Sklepom 2001/645/ES [3] sprejela zaveze, ki jih je ponudilo pet indijskih proizvajalcev: Ester Industries Limited („Ester“), Flex Industries Limited („Flex“), Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“), MTZ Polyfilms Limited („MTZ“), in Polyplex Corporation Limited („Polyplex“).
On 22 November 2003 [4], the Commission initiated a partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 limited to the form of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 22. novembra 2003 [4] začela delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, omejen na obliko dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 [5], which amended Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 365/2006 [5], ki je spremenila Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001.
WITHDRAWAL OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF UNDERTAKINGS
UMIK SPREJETJA ZAVEZ
As set out in recitals 22 to 25 of Regulation (EC) No 365/2006, and after having consulted all parties concerned, the undertakings in their current form are not appropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping, since they present both considerable monitoring and enforcement difficulties and unacceptable risks.
Kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah 22 do 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 365/2006 in po posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi strankami, so zaveze v sedanji obliki neustrezne za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga, saj so povezane s preobsežnim nadzorom, težavnim izvrševanjem in nesprejemljivim tveganjem.
On this basis, and also in accordance with the relevant clauses of the undertakings in question, which authorise the Commission to unilaterally withdraw the acceptance of the undertakings, the Commission has decided to withdraw the acceptance of the undertakings.
Na podlagi tega in v skladu z ustreznimi klavzulami zadevnih zavez, ki pooblaščajo Komisijo, da enostransko umakne sprejetje zavez, se je ta odločila, da umakne sprejetje zavez.
The Commission informed the Indian authorities and the Indian exporting producers concerned in Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 that it proposed to withdraw the acceptance of the current undertakings.
Komisija je zadevne indijske organe in proizvajalce izvoznike z Uredbo (ES) št. 365/2006 obvestila, da je predlagala umik sprejetja sedanjih zavez.
The interested parties were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe.
These comments are addressed in recitals 27 to 31 of Regulation (EC) No 365/2006.
Pripombe so obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah 27 do 31 Uredbe (ES) št. 365/2006.
REPEAL OF DECISION 2001/645/EC
RAZVELJAVITEV SKLEPA 2001/645/ES
In the light of the above, Decision 2001/645/EC accepting undertakings from Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Flex Industries Limited (Flex), Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), MTZ Polyfilms Limited (MTZ) and Polyplex Corporation Limited (Polyplex) should be repealed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba Sklep 2001/645/ES o sprejetju zavez družb Ester Industries Limited („Ester“), Flex Industries Limited („Flex“), Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“), MTZ Polyfilms Limited („MTZ“) in Polyplex Corporation Limited („Polyplex“) razveljaviti.
In parallel to this Decision, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [6], has imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India,
Hkrati s tem sklepom je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 366/2006 [6] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije v Skupnost –
Decision 2001/645/EC is hereby repealed.
Sklep 2001/645/ES se razveljavi.
amending Decision 2000/24/EC in order to include the Maldives in the list of countries covered, following the Indian Ocean tsunamis of December 2004
o spremembi Sklepa 2000/24/ES, da bi se na seznam držav vključili Maldivi, po cunamijih v Indijskem oceanu decembra 2004
The tsunamis in the Indian Ocean region on 26 December 2004 caused widespread damage to certain coastal regions of surrounding countries.
Cunamiji v regiji ob Indijskem oceanu so 26. decembra 2004 povzročili obsežno škodo nekaterim obalnim regijam v okoliških državah.
The European Investment Bank has identified potential projects in the most seriously affected countries, including the Maldives, which could benefit entities which have suffered direct or indirect losses as a result of the tsunamis.
Evropska investicijska banka je opredelila možne projekte v najbolj prizadetih državah, vključno z Maldivi, kar bi lahko koristilo subjektom, ki so jih prizadele neposredne ali posredne izgube zaradi cunamijev.
Council Decision 2000/24/EC of 22 December 1999 granting a Community guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans for projects outside the Community (Central and Eastern Europe, Mediterranean countries, Latin America and Asia and the Republic of South Africa) [2] does not include the Maldives in the list of countries covered.
V Sklepu Sveta 2000/24/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o jamstvu Skupnosti, ki se odobri Evropski investicijski banki zaradi izgub pri posojilih za projekte zunaj Skupnosti (Srednja in Vzhodna Evropa, sredozemske države, Južna Amerika in Azija ter Južnoafriška republika) [2] se Maldivi niso vključili na seznam zajetih držav.
Decision 2000/24/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Sklep 2000/24/ES je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti –
In the fourth indent of Article 1(2) of Decision 2000/24/EC, ‘the Maldives’ shall be inserted between ‘Malaysia’ and ‘Mongolia’.
Člen 1(2) Sklepa 2000/24/ES se spremeni, kakor sledi: v četrti alinei se med besedi „Malezija“ in „Mongolija“ vstavi beseda „Maldivi“.
Opinion delivered on 17 January 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 17. januarja 2006 (še ni objavljeno v UL).
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/47/EC (OJ L 21, 25.1.2005, p. 9).
Sklep, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2005/47/ES (UL L 21, 25.1.2005, str. 9).
of 2 March 2006
z dne 2. marca 2006
amending Decision 2006/135/EC as regarding the establishment of areas A and B in France due to an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in that Member State
o spremembi Odločbe 2006/135/ES glede vzpostavitve območij A in B v Franciji zaradi izbruha visoko patogene aviarne influence v navedeni državi članici
(notified under document number C(2006) 721)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 721)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) 998/2003 of 26 May 2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC [3], and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 998/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 o zahtevah v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki se uporabljajo za netrgovske premike hišnih živali, in o spremembi Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS [3], in zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC [4], and in particular Article 66(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2005/94/ES z dne 20. decembra 2005 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS [4], in zlasti člena 66(2) Direktive,
France has notified the Commission and the other Member States of an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 in poultry in certain areas of its territory and has taken the appropriate measures provided for in Commission Decision 2006/135/EC of 22 February 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in the Community [5].
Francija je Komisijo in druge države članice obvestila o izbruhu visoko patogene aviarne influence, ki jo povzroča virus influence A seva H5N1, pri perutnini na določenih območjih svojega ozemlja in sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe, ki jih določa Odločba Komisije 2006/135/ES z dne 22. februarja 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v Skupnosti [5].
After notification of those measures, the Commission has examined them in collaboration with France, and is satisfied that areas A and B established by France are at sufficient distance to the outbreak in poultry and epidemiologically related cases in wild birds.
Te ukrepe je Komisija po tem, ko je bila uradno obveščena o njih, preučila skupaj s Francijo in presodila, da so območja A in B, ki jih je vzpostavila Francija, dovolj oddaljena od kraja izbruha pri perutnini in epidemiološko povezanih primerov pri prostoživečih pticah.
It is therefore necessary to amend Parts A and B of Annex I to that Decision accordingly and to fix the duration of that regionalisation.
Zato je treba ustrezno spremeniti dela A in B Priloge I k navedeni Odločbi ter določiti trajanje te regionalizacije.
Annex I to Decision 2006/135/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2006/135/ES se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 2 March 2006.
V Bruslju, 2. marca 2006
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33); corrected version (OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/41/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33); popravljena različica (UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
OJ L 52, 23.2.2006, p. 41.
UL L 52, 23.2.2006, str. 41.
Postcode
Poštna številka
The municipalities of:
Občine
Protection zone
Okuženo območje
Surveillance zone
Ogroženo območje
on Alitalia's industrial restructuring plan
o industrijskem načrtu prestrukturiranja Alitalie
(notified under document number C(2005) 1651)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 1651)
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru in zlasti točke a) člena 62(1),
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1], and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zadevnim strankam k predložitvi svojih pripomb v skladu z navedenima členoma [1] in ob upoštevanju navedenih pripomb,
On 15 October 2004 Italy notified the Commission of Alitalia's industrial restructuring plan, in particular the planned recapitalisation of the company and the investment which the State holding company Fintecna SpA intended to make in its groundhandling services.
Italija je 15. oktobra 2004 uradno obvestila Komisijo o načrtu prestrukturiranja družbe Alitalia in zlasti o predvideni dokapitalizaciji družbe ter predvidenih naložbah javnega holdinga Fintecna v njene oskrbovalne storitve na letališču.