natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The registration number(s) of rail-wagon or lorry and the name of the ship should be given as appropriate.
Ustrezno naj se navede registrska(-e) številka(-e) železniškega vagona ali tovornjaka in ime ladje.
If known, the flight number of the aircraft.
Če je znana, se navede številka leta.
In case of transport in containers or boxes, the total number, their registration and seal numbers, if present, should be indicated under point 7.3.
V primeru prevoza v zabojnikih ali škatlah naj se v točki 7.3 navede njihovo skupno število, registrska številka in številka plomb (če so nameščene).
Keep as appropriate.
Neustrezno črtati.
Complete if appropriate.
Izpolniti po potrebi.
If appropriate, indicate “matured” and/or “minced”.
Po potrebi se navede ‚zorjeno‘ in/ali ‚mleto‘.
If frozen, indicate the date of freezing (mm/yy) of the cuts/pieces.
Če je zamrznjeno, se navede datum zamrzovanja (mm/ll) kosov.
Trimmed offal of domestic bovines must be exclusively those offal from which the bones, cartilage, trachea and main bronchi, lymphatic glands adhering connective tissue, fat and mucus have been completely removed.
Obrezani klavnični odpadki domačega goveda morajo biti izključno klavnični odpadki, s katerih so bili popolnoma odstranjeni kosti, hrustanec, sapnik in glavni bronhiji, limfne žleze, pripadajoče vezno tkivo, maščoba in sluznice.
Whole masseter muscles, incised in accordance with paragraph 41, A (a) of Chapter VIII of Annex I to Council Directive 64/433/EEC (as last amended), are also permitted.
Dovoljene so tudi cele žvečne mišice, zarezane v skladu s točko A (a) odstavka 41 v Poglavju VIII Priloge I k Direktivi Sveta 64/433/EGS (kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Minced meat is meat which has been minced into fragments or passed through a spiral-screw mincer and that must have been prepared exclusively from striated muscle (including the adjoining fatty tissues) except heart muscle.
Mleto meso je meso, ki je bilo sesekljano na koščke ali zmleto v mesoreznici in je bilo pripravljeno izključno iz progastih mišic (vključno s pripadajočim maščobnim tkivom), razen iz srčne mišice.
Regarding fresh meat, the provisions of Council Directive 72/462/EEC (as last amended) shall apply.
Za sveže meso se uporabljajo določbe Direktive Sveta 72/462/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
From 8 June 2003, fresh meat shall come from establishments implementing checks on general hygiene, in accordance with Commission Decision 2001/471/EC (as last amended).
Od 8. junija 2003 dalje sveže meso prihaja iz obratov, v katerih v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2001/471/ES (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) izvajajo preglede splošne higiene.
For minced meat, those of Council Directive 94/65/EC are also applicable as last amended.
Za mleto meso se uporabljajo tudi določbe Direktive Sveta 94/65/ES, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena.
Regarding welfare at slaughter, the provisions of Council Directive 93/119/EC (as last amended) shall apply.
Glede dobrega počutja živali ob zakolu se uporabljajo določbe Direktive Sveta 93/119/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Regarding BSE, in accordance with the provisions of European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 999/2001, (as last amended).
Glede BSE se uporabljajo določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Only countries listed in Annex XI, Chapter A point 15(b) to European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (as last amended).
Samo države iz točke 15(b) Poglavja A v Prilogi XI k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Insert the exact wording as laid down in Annex XI, Chapter A point 15(b) to the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 (as last amended).
Vstaviti natančno besedilo iz točke 15(b) Poglavja A v Prilogi XI k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Only matured de-boned meat fulfilling the supplementary guarantees mentioned under (13) below, or in the case of trimmed-offal fulfilling the supplementary guarantees mentioned under (14) below.
Samo zorjeno izkoščeno meso, ki izpolnjuje dodatna jamstva iz opombe (13) spodaj, v primeru obrezanih klavničnih odpadkov pa tisti, ki izpolnjujejo dodatna jamstva iz opombe (14) spodaj.
Delete when the exporting country carries out vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease with serotypes A, O or C, and this country is allowed for export to the European Community matured de-boned meat or trimmed-offal, which fulfils the supplementary guarantees described under, respectively, (13) or (14) below.
Črtati, kadar država izvoznica izvaja cepljenje proti slinavki in parkljevki s serotipi A, O ali C in kadar ima ta država dovoljenje, da v Evropsko skupnost izvaža zorjeno izkoščeno meso ali obrezanih klavničnih odpadkov, ki izpolnjujejo dodatna jamstva iz opomb (13) in (14) spodaj.
Supplementary guarantees regarding matured de-boned meat to be provided when required in column 5 "SG" of Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (as last amended), with the entry “A”.
Kadar je v stolpcu 5 ‚DJ‘ Dela 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) vnos ‚A‘, je treba zagotoviti dodatna jamstva glede zorjenega izkoščenega mesa.
Supplementary guarantees regarding matured trimmed offal to be provided when required in column 5 "SG" of Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (as last amended), with the entry “B”.
Kadar je v stolpcu 5 ‚DJ‘ dela 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) vnos ‚B‘, je treba zagotoviti dodatna jamstva glede zorjenih obrezanih klavničnih odpadkov.
Date or dates of slaughter.
Datum(-i) zakola.
Imports of this meat shall not be allowed when obtained from animals slaughtered either prior to the date of authorisation for exportation to the European Community of the territory mentioned under (3), or during a period where restrictive measures have been adopted by the European Community against imports of this meat from this territory.
Uvoz tega mesa se ne dovoli, če je pridobljeno iz živali, zaklanih pred datumom dovoljenja za izvoz v Evropsko skupnost z ozemlja, navedenega pod (3), ali med obdobjem, v katerem je Evropska skupnost sprejela omejevalne ukrepe za uvoz tega mesa s tega ozemlja.
Supplementary guarantees concerning tuberculosis test, to be provided when required in column 5 “SG” of Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (as last amended), with the entry “E”.
Kadar je v stolpcu 5 ‚DJ‘ dela 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) vnos ‚E‘, je treba zagotoviti dodatna jamstva glede testov za tuberkulozo.
Intra-dermal tuberculosis test to be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Annex B to Council Directive 64/432/EEC (as last amended).
Interdermalni test na tuberkulozo mora biti izveden v skladu z določbami Priloge B k Direktivi Sveta 64/432/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena).
Supplementary guarantees regarding matured de-boned meat to be provided when required in column 5 "SG" of Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (as last amended), with the entry “F”.
Kadar je v stolpcu 5 ‚DJ‘ dela 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) vnos ‚F‘, je treba zagotoviti dodatna jamstva glede zorjenega izkoščenega mesa.
The matured de-boned meat shall not be allowed for importation into the European Community until 21 days after the date of slaughter of the animals.
Uvoz zorjenega izkoščenega mesa v Evropsko skupnost ni dovoljen v obdobju 21 dni po datumu zakola živali.
Supplementary guarantees regarding import of matured de-boned meat to be provided when required in column 5 "SG" of Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC (as last amended)with the entry “H”’.
Kadar je v stolpcu 5 ‚DJ‘ dela 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena) vnos ‚H‘, je treba zagotoviti dodatna jamstva glede uvoza zorjenega izkoščenega mesa.“
Without prejudice to specific certification requirements provided for by Community agreements with third countries.
Brez poseganja v posebne zahteve glede izdaje spričeval, ki so določene v sporazumih Skupnosti s tretjimi državami.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; provisional code that does not prejudge in any way the definitive nomenclature for this country, which will be agreed following the conclusion of negotiations currently taking place on this subjet in the United Nations.
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija; začasna oznaka, ki na noben način ne vpliva na dokončno poimenovanje te države, ki bo sprejeto po zaključku pogajanj, ki trenutno na to temo potekajo v Združenih narodih.
Serbia and Montenegro are Republics with individual customs territory forming a State Union and therefore have to be listed separately.
Srbija in Črna gora sta republiki z ločenima carinskima območjema, ki sestavljata državno skupnost, zato sta navedeni vsaka posebej.
State of Espíritu Santo;
Zvezna država Espíritu Santo;
State of Goias and;
Zvezna država Goias in
State of Mato Grosso do Sul and
Zvezna država Mato Grosso do Sul in
State of Sao Paulo.
zvezna država Sao Paulo
on the State aid which Italy is planning to implement for Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl, both part of the De Tomaso group
o državni pomoči ki jo namerava Italija izvajati za Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl, ki sta del skupine De Tomaso
(notified under document number C(2005) 40)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 40)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE–
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskega gospodarskega prostora, zlasti člena 62(1)(a) Pogodbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1],
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi določbami [1],
By letter dated 18 December 2002 the Italian authorities notified to the Commission a plan to grant regional aid to Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl.
V pismu z dne 18. decembra 2002 so italijanske oblasti Komisiji priglasile načrt za dodeljevanje regionalne pomoči družbama Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl.
The Commission requested further information on 4 February 2003.
Komisija je 4. februarja 2003 zahtevala dodatne informacije.
After requesting extensions of the deadline for replying on 12 March and 22 April 2003, the Italian authorities provided the information by letter dated 26 May 2003.
Po zahtevi za podaljšanje roka za odgovor 12. marca in 22. aprila 2003 so italijanske oblasti v pismu z dne 26. maja 2003 zagotovile informacije.
By letter dated 24 July 2003, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
V pismu z dne 24. julija 2003 je Komisija Italijo obvestila, da se je v zvezi s pomočjo odločila sprožiti postopek, določen v členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Komisija od zainteresiranih strank ni prejela nobenih pripomb.
Italy submitted its comments in response to the decision opening proceedings on 13 October 2003.
Italija je 13. oktobra 2003 svoje pripombe predložila v odgovor na sklep o sprožitvi postopka.
Italy sent further information by letter dated 23 April 2004.
V pismu z dne 23. aprila 2004 je Italija poslala dodatne informacije.
On 30 April 2004, the Italian Minister for Production Activities addressed a letter to the Commission asking for an early decision on the case.
Italijanski minister za proizvodne dejavnosti je 30. aprila 2004 na Komisijo naslovil pismo, v katerem je zaprosil za hitro odločitev o zadevi.
The Commission replied to this letter on 18 June 2004.
Komisija je na to pismo odgovorila 18. junija 2004.
The planned aid would be granted to Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl, which form part of the De Tomaso group (‘De Tomaso’).
Načrtovana pomoč bi bila dodeljena družbama Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl, ki sta del skupine De Tomaso („De Tomaso“).
De Tomaso is currently active in the production of a very limited number of high performance sports cars.
Skupina De Tomaso se trenutno ukvarja s proizvodnjo zelo omejenega števila visoko zmogljivih športnih avtomobilov.
According to Italy, De Tomaso qualifies as a small or medium-sized enterprise under the definition given in Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid to small and medium-sized enterprises [3] (‘the SME Regulation’).
Po podatkih Italije velja skupina De Tomaso po opredelitvi, navedeni v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja [3] („Uredba MSP“), za majhno ali srednje veliko podjetje.
De Tomaso plans to set up a new greenfield production plant that when completed will have an installed capacity for:
Načrti skupine De Tomasa za izgradnjo povsem novega proizvodnega obrata, ki bo ob koncu izgradnje imel vgrajene zmogljivosti za:
final assembly of around 40000 units/year of the Simbir model, an off-road vehicle produced by the Russian motor vehicle manufacturer UAZ;
končno sestavljanje okoli 40000 enot/leto modela Simbir, terenskega vozila, ki ga proizvaja ruski proizvajalec motornih vozil UAZ;
production of around 8000 units/year of the Vallelunga, a sports sedan model, and 300 units/year of the Pantera, a luxury sports model.
proizvodnjo okoli 8000 enot/leto modela Vallelunga, športnega modela sedan in 300 enot/leto luksuznega športnega modela Pantera.
The project is planned to start as soon as the Commission authorises the state aid and completion is scheduled for 2006.
Začetek projekta je načrtovan takoj, ko Komisija odobri državno pomoč, zaključek projekta je predviden za leto 2006.
Motor vehicle production would start in 2005.
Proizvodnja motornih vozil bi se začela leta 2005.
According to the Italian authorities, the project is mobile and De Tomaso is considering the alternative sites of Timisoara (Romania) for the Simbir model and Modena (Italy) for the Vallelunga and Pantera models.
Po podatkih italijanskih oblasti projekt ni vezana na določeno lokacijo in skupina De Tomaso obravnava kot alternativni lokaciji za izvedbo projekta Timisoaro (Romunija) za model Simbir ter Modeno (Italija) za modela Vallelunga in Pantera.
The investment at Timisoara would be carried out on a greenfield site, while the investment at Modena would consist in the expansion of an existing De Tomaso plant that currently produces a very limited number of the Guara model, a high performance sports car.
V Timisoari bi se naložba izvedla na povsem novi lokaciji, medtem ko bi naložbo v Modeni predstavljala razširitev obstoječega obrata skupine De Tomaso, ki trenutno proizvaja zelo omejeno število modela Guara, visoko zmogljivega športnega avtomobila.
According to the notification, De Tomaso intends to invest a nominal amount of EUR 218760000 (EUR 206912337 in present values, calculated using 2003 as the base year and a discount rate of 5,06% [5].
V skladu s priglasitvijo namerava skupina De Tomaso vložiti nominalni znesek v višini 218760000 EUR (206912337 EUR v trenutni vrednosti, izračunani z uporabo leta 2003 kot izhodiščnega leta in diskontne stopnje v višini 5,06 % [5]).
The entire investment amount was considered eligible by the Italian authorities.
Italijanske oblasti so potrdile upravičenost celotnega naložbenega zneska.
Legal basis and aid amounts
Pravna podlaga in zneski pomoči
The notified aid was granted, subject to approval by the Commission, in two phases to two companies belonging to De Tomaso.
Priglašena pomoč je bila ob upoštevanju odobritve Komisije dodeljena dvema družbama v lasti skupine De Tomaso v dveh fazah .
The aid would be granted under schemes approved by the Commission [6] and provided for by the Law on measures to promote production activities in depressed areas (‘Law No 488/1992’) and the Law on measures to rationalise public finances (‘Law No 662/1996’).
Pomoč bi bila dodeljena na podlagi programov, odobrenih s strani Komisije [6] in predvidenih z Zakonom o ukrepih za spodbujanje proizvodnih dejavnosti v območjih v krizi („Zakon št. 488/1992“) in z Zakonom o ukrepih za racionaliziranje javnih financ („Zakon št. 662/1996“).
Since the two grants relate to the same project, the Italian authorities notified them jointly.
Ker se obe odobritvi nanašata na enak projekt, so ju italijanske oblasti prijavile skupaj.
Total aid to De Tomaso would therefore amount to a nominal EUR 178008817 (EUR 155640104 in present values, calculated using 2003 as the base year and a discount rate of 5,06 %).
Skupni znesek pomoči skupini De Tomaso bi tako znašal nominalno 178008817 EUR (155640104 EUR v sedanji vrednosti, izračunani z uporabo leta 2003 kot izhodiščnega leta in diskontne stopnje v višini 5,06 %).
The aid intensity notified by the Italian authorities is 75,22 % gge.
Intenzivnost pomoči, ki so jo priglasile italijanske oblasti, znaša 75,22 % bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge).
According to Italy, no other Community aid or financing has been allocated to the project.
Po podatkih Italije projektu ni bila dodeljena nobena druga pomoč ali financiranje s strani Skupnosti.
In its decision of 23 July 2003 to initiate proceedings, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether De Tomaso qualified as an SME.
Komisija je v svojem sklepu z dne 23. julija 2003 o sprožitvi postopka izrazila dvom o opredelitvi skupine De Tomaso kot MSP.
It also expressed doubts concerning a number of elements of the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), and in particular:
Izrazila je tudi dvome glede števila elementov analize stroškov in koristi (CBA) ter zlasti glede:
the comparability of the projects in the chosen and alternative locations;
primerljivosti projektov na izbranih in alternativnih lokacijah;
the comparison of investment costs in the CBA;
primerjave naložbenih stroškov v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA);
the comparison of operating costs in the CBA, with special reference to labour and outward transport costs.
primerjave poslovnih stroškov v analizi stroškov in koristi, s posebnim sklicevanjem na stroške dela in stroške zunanjega prevoza.
COMMENTS FROM ITALY
PRIPOMBE S STRANI ITALIJE
On 13 October 2003, Italy sent its comments in response to the decision opening proceedings.
Italija je 13. oktobra 2003 poslala svoje pripombe v odgovor na sklep o sprožitvi postopka.
Further information and documents were supplied to the Commission during the meeting that took place on 17 February 2004 and with the letters of 23 and 30 April 2004.
Nadaljnje informacije in dokumenti so bili Komisiji predloženi med srečanjem, ki je potekalo 17. februarja 2004 in v pismih z dne 23. in 30. aprila 2004.
Regarding the SME status of De Tomaso, Italy provided detailed information on the ownership structure as well as the financial statements for the enterprise Alejandro S.A. and an extract of Mr De Tomaso’s last will.
V zvezi s statusom MSP skupine De Tomaso je Italija zagotovila podrobne informacije o lastniški strukturi kot tudi računovodski izkazi za podjetje Alejandro S.A. in izvleček oporoke g. De Tomasa.
On the comparability of the projects in the chosen and alternative locations, Italy affirmed first of all that the projects compared identical productions, in identical numbers, for the same product mix and with identical prices.
Glede primerljivosti projektov na izbrani in alternativnih lokacijah je Italija potrdila, da v primerjavi med projekti samimi ti ponujajo identično proizvodnjo, v identičnih številkah, za enako ponudbo in z identičnimi cenami.
The difference in the investments necessary in the alternatives could be explained by considering the specificity of the chosen location, which was similar to the northern part of Italy from the standpoint of labour costs and social, safety and environmental legislation, but lacked a skilled workforce and a solid industrial tradition.
Razliko v naložbah, potrebnih za alternativni lokaciji, je mogoče razložiti z upoštevanjem specifičnosti izbrane lokacije, ki je bila z vidika stroškov dela in socialne, varnostne ter okoljevarstvene zakonodaje podobna severnem delu Italije, vendar ni imela usposobljene delovne sile in zanesljive industrijske tradicije.
The situation in the alternative locations was, according to Italy, very different: a highly skilled workforce was available at Modena, as was a dense network of automotive suppliers and producers.
Po podatkih Italije je bil položaj na alternativnih lokacijah zelo drugačen: v Modeni je bila na voljo visoko usposobljena delovna sila kot tudi zgoščena mreža avtomobilskih dobaviteljev in proizvajalcev.
At Timisoara, skilled labour was available at a fraction of the cost it would command at Cutro.
V Timisoari so bili na voljo usposobljeni delavci za samo delček stroškov, ki bi jih zahtevala lokacija v Cutru.
Timisoara also presented a logistic advantage for the production of the Simbir model.
Timisoara je predstavlja tudi logistično prednost za proizvodnjo modela Simbir.
Italy reaffirmed the strategic value of the Cutro project for the industrial development of the area.
Italija je ponovno potrdila strateško vrednost projekta Cutro za industrijski razvoj območja.
In this context, the technological choices aimed at establishing an advanced production facility that incorporated the most innovative techniques and equipment and allowed De Tomaso to carry out in-house research and development.
V tem kontekstu je bil namen tehnološke izbire vzpostavitev izpopolnjenega proizvodnega obrata, ki je vključeval najbolj inovativne tehnologijo in opremo ter skupini De Tomaso omogočil izvedbo interne raziskave in razvoja.
The projects for the alternative sites opted, on the contrary, for more traditional technological solutions.
Nasprotno so bile v projektih za alternativni lokaciji izbrane bolj tradicionalne tehnološke rešitve.
Based on these considerations, Italy affirmed that the Commission’s demand that a comparison be made between totally identical projects was wrong and misleading, as it would force a comparison between ‘hypothetical’ solutions that were not based on the real intention of the company carrying out the investments.
Na podlagi teh premislekov je Italija zatrdila, da je zahteva Komisije po primerjavi med popolnoma identičnima projektoma napačna in zavajajoča, saj bi izsilila primerjavo med „hipotetičnimi“ rešitvami, ki ne temeljijo na resničnih namerah družbe, ki izvaja naložbe.
Italy claimed that the comparison ‘operation by operation’ for the investments in the alternative solutions as required by the Commission for the CBA was not feasible because it would require the complete development of the alternative projects, something that De Tomaso could afford to do only after the location choice was made.
Italija je trdila, da primerjava „delovanje z delovanjem“ za naložbe v alternativnih rešitvah, kot je zahtevala Komisija za analizo stroškov in koristi (CBA) ni izvedljiva, saj bi zahtevala popolni razvoj alternativnih projektov, kar pa bi lahko skupina De Tomaso zagotovila šele po izbiri lokacije.
This notwithstanding, Italy provided new, more detailed, information comparing the investments at Cutro and the alternative sites for pressing, welding and painting for the sports cars (Cutro versus Modena) and for final assembly and painting for the Simbir model (Cutro versus Timisoara).
Ne glede na to je Italija podala nove, podrobnejše informacije o primerjavi naložb v Cutru in alternativnih lokacijah namenjenih stiskanju, varjenju in lakiranju športnih avtomobilov (Cutro proti Modena) ter končnemu sestavljanju in lakiranju modela Simbir (Cutro proti Timisoara).