natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, it appeared that styling, design, sales channels and consumer service were not fundamentally different from other footwear types under investigation.
Poleg tega se je zdelo, da se oblika, prodajne poti in storitve za potrošnike bistveno ne razlikujejo od drugih vrst obutve v preiskavi.
Just the mere fact that children's footwear form a distinctive product sub-group within the scope of the product concerned does not warrant the exclusion from the product scope.
Samo dejstvo, da je otroška obutev posebna podskupina izdelka v okviru obsega zadevnega izdelka, še ne utemeljuje izključitve iz obsega izdelka.
Indeed, it was found that there is no clear dividing line between children's footwear and the product concerned, but that there is rather a large overlap regarding the definition of the product concerned, notably that it is a device to cover and protect the feet of human beings essentially for walking purposes.
Dejansko je bilo ugotovljeno, da med otroško obutvijo in zadevnim izdelkom ni jasne ločnice, ampak se pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka lastnosti v veliki meri prekrivajo, in sicer da gre za izdelek za pokritje in zaščito stopal, zlasti pri hoji.
In its reaction to the disclosure of the provisional Regulation, the Community industry claimed that children's footwear should be part of the product concerned.
Industrija Skupnosti je v svojem odgovoru na razkritje začasne uredbe zahtevala vključitev otroške obutve v zadevni izdelek.
In particular, evidence was submitted proving that there was still an important production of children's footwear in the Community.
Zlasti so bili predloženi dokazi, da obstaja v Skupnosti pomembna proizvodnja otroške obutve.
The submission of the Community industry only confirms the definitive findings.
Trditve industrije Skupnosti le še potrjujejo dokončne ugotovitve.
It is therefore definitively concluded that children footwear should be included in the definition of the product concerned.
Zato se dokončno sklene, da je treba otroško obutev vključiti v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
Other requests for exclusions
Drugi zahtevki za izključitev
Several interested parties claimed that certain other types of footwear within these CN codes were too different, in particular in terms of use, to belong to the same category of products.
Številne zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da se določene druge vrste obutve znotraj teh oznak KN preveč razlikujejo, zlasti glede uporabe, da bi lahko sodile v isto kategorijo izdelkov.
These claims are analysed below.
Analiza teh trditev sledi v nadaljevanju.
‘Hiking’, ‘climbing’ and other outdoor shoes
„Pohodniški“ in „planinski“ čevlji ter drugi čevlji za na prostem
Within the meaning of the Combined nomenclature, ‘hiking’, ‘climbing’ and other outdoor shoes (‘hiking shoes’) are not considered as a sporting activity and therefore these shoe types fall outside the definition of STAF footwear as defined in recital 13 of the provisional Regulation.
V smislu kombinirane nomenklature se za „pohodniške“, „planinske“ in druge čevlje za na prostem („pohodniški čevlji“) ne šteje, da se uporabljajo pri športnih aktivnostih, in zato te vrste čevljev ne sodijo v opredelitev obutve STAF, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 13 začasne uredbe.
However, certain parties requested that this product be excluded from the scope of the proceeding because (i) the requirements for such hiking shoes are allegedly very similar to STAF specifications, (ii) hiking shoes can allegedly be clearly distinguished from other footwear types in terms of sales channels and consumer perception and (iii) paying more duties on hiking footwear would have allegedly a detrimental effect on this specific market.
Vendar pa so nekatere stranke zahtevale, da se ta izdelek izključi iz postopka, ker (i) so zahteve za take pohodniške čevlje domnevno zelo podobne tehničnim zahtevam za obutev STAF, (ii) naj bi se pohodniški čevlji v smislu prodajnih poti in dojemanja potrošnika jasno razlikovali od druge vrste obutve in ker (iii) naj bi plačevanje več dajatev za pohodniško obutev odločilno vplivalo na ta poseben trg.
No additional evidence concerning specific technicalities and characteristics of hiking shoes was submitted to change the conclusion of recital 34 of the provisional Regulation which states that, although various types of footwear, e.g. hiking footwear, may indeed have some additional different specific characteristics, the basic characteristics of also this type of footwear remain identical.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni dodatni dokazi glede posebnih tehničnih podrobnosti in lastnosti pohodniških čevljev, ki bi spremenili sklep iz uvodne izjave 34 začasne uredbe, ki navaja, da čeprav imajo različne vrste obutve, tj. pohodniška obutev, dejansko nekaj dodatnih posebnih lastnosti, ostajajo osnovne lastnosti tudi te vrste obutve enake.
Furthermore, it was found that ‘hiking’ shoes are widely produced in the Community and that a clear dividing line between the imported ‘hiking shoes’ and Community production could not be drawn.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da se „pohodniški“ čevlji na veliko proizvajajo v Skupnosti in da ni mogoče določiti jasne ločnice med uvoženimi „pohodniškimi čevlji“ in proizvodnjo Skupnosti.
This was also confirmed by the decision to include the same type of footwear in the product scope regarding Council Regulation (EC) No 2155/97 [4].
To je potrdil tudi sklep o vključitvi iste vrste obutve v obseg izdelka glede na Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2155/97 [4].
Although hiking shoes may sometimes have specific characteristics, they share the same basic physical and technical characteristics of other footwear covered by the product scope.
Čeprav imajo včasih pohodniški čevlji posebne lastnosti, pa imajo enake fizične in tehnične lastnosti druge obutve, zajete v obseg izdelka.
Furthermore, as regards their use and consumer perception, it was also found that there is a large overlap with other types of footwear covered by the product definition.
V zvezi z njihovo uporabo in dojemanjem potrošnika je bilo ugotovljeno tudi, da se v veliki meri prekrivajo z drugo vrsto obutve, zajete v opredelitev izdelka.
Accordingly, it is considered that ‘hiking shoes’ should remain within the scope of the investigation.
Skladno s tem se šteje, da morajo „pohodniški čevlji“ ostati v obsegu preiskave.
Footwear with mechano-therapeutic applications
Obutev z mehanoterapevtsko uporabo
One importer requested the exclusion of certain footwear with mechano-therapeutic applications.
En uvoznik je zahteval izključitev določene obutve z mehanoterapavtsko uporabo.
Although the product currently falls within CN code 64039993, 64039996 and 64039998, it was claimed that this type of footwear should be excluded from the scope of the proceeding, because it has allegedly different physical and chemical characteristics, different sales channels and different consumer perception as a certified medical product, authorised to be sold as medical devices for mechano-therapeutic applications.
Čeprav se izdelek trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN 64039993, 64039996 in 64039998, se je trdilo, da je treba to vrsto obutve izključiti iz obsega preiskave, ker naj bi imela drugačne fizične in kemijske lastnosti ter drugačne prodajne poti in dojemanje potrošnika kot potrjeni medicinski izdelek, za katerega je odobreno, da se prodaja kot medicinski pripomoček za mehanoterapevtsko uporabo.
It was found that this type of footwear should be considered as part of the product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je treba to vrsto obutve šteti kot del zadevnega izdelka.
Although this product has a distinctive technology and application which might be applied for medical purposes, these specific features do not clearly and structurally differ from the product concerned.
Čeprav ima ta izdelek drugačno tehnologijo in uporabo, ki bi lahko veljala tudi za medicinske namene, pa teh posebnih lastnosti ni mogoče jasno in strukturno ločiti od zadevnega izdelka.
This is underlined by the fact that this type of footwear is also purchased by consumers who purchase it for their convenience, rather than for specific medical reasons, which was even acknowledged in the claim as submitted by the importer.
To podkrepljuje tudi dejstvo, da to vrsto obutve kupujejo potrošniki zaradi udobnosti in ne zaradi posebnih medicinskih vzrokov, kar je priznal tudi uvoznik v svojih navedbah.
For the above reasons it is considered that the claim to exclude footwear with mechano-therapeutic applications should be rejected.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov se šteje, da je treba zahtevo za izključitev obutve z mehanoterapevtsko uporabo zavrniti.
EVA beach sandals
Sandali za na plažo EVA
EVA beach sandals (‘EBS’) are shoes the upper of which is limited to a strip of leather material, this upper being attached to both sides of a thick lightweight sole, made of a combination of EVA and other materials.
Sandali za na plažo EVA („SPE“) so čevlji, katerih zgornji del je omejen na usnjeni trak, ki se pripne na obe strani debelega lahkega podplata, narejenega iz kombinacije etilen-vinil acetata in drugih materialov.
Certain interested parties claimed that such a product should be excluded from the scope of the present investigation since they allegedly have very specific and distinctive basic physical and technical characteristics that make them easy to recognise as beach sandals and, hence, have a different end use and consumer perception than other types of footwear covered by the product definition.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je treba tak izdelek izključiti iz obsega sedanje preiskave, ker naj bi imela ta obutev zelo specifične in drugačne osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti, po katerih se jo lahko enostavno prepozna kot sandale za na plažo, torej se od drugih vrst obutve, ki je zajeta v opredelitev izdelka, razlikuje po končni uporabi in dojemanju potrošnika.
Furthermore, it was alleged that the technology applying to EBS had been completely moved out of Europe.
Trdile so tudi, da se tehnologija, ki se uporablja za SPE, v Evropi ne uporablja več.
In this respect it was found that, while EBS indeed have some specific characteristics, they share the same basic physical and technical characteristics of other footwear covered by the product scope.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo SPE kljub dejanskim posebnim lastnostim vendarle enake fizične in tehnične lastnosti druge obutve, zajete v obseg izdelka.
Furthermore, as regards their use and consumer perception, it was also found that there is a large overlap with other types of footwear covered by the product definition, e.g. thongs and clogs.
Kar zadeva njihovo uporabo in dojemanje potrošnika pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da se v veliki meri prekrivajo z drugo vrsto obutve, zajete v opredelitev izdelka, tj. čevlji z zgornjim delom iz jermenov in coklji.
Moreover, sales channels, marketing, fashion etc. were found to be the same as for other types of footwear covered by the product definition.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da so prodajne poti, trženje, modni trendi itd. enaki kot pri drugih vrstah obutve, zajete v opredelitev izdelka.
In addition, the Community industry submitted evidence showing there is still a significant production of EBS in the EC.
Poleg tega je industrija Skupnosti predložila dokaze o tem, da je v ES še vedno na voljo znatna proizvodnja SPE.
Consequently, it is considered that this claim for exclusion should be rejected.
Zato se šteje, da je treba zahtevo za izključitev zavrniti.
Pigskin leather shoes
Čevlji iz svinjskega usnja
One interested party claimed that footwear with pigskin leather uppers should be excluded from the scope of the investigation because of alleged quality and price differences and an alleged lack of EC production with such kind of uppers.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je zahtevala, da se obutev z zgornjim delom iz svinjskega usnja zaradi domnevnih razlik v kakovosti in ceni ter domnevnem pomanjkanju proizvodnje ES obutve s takim zgornjim delom izključi iz obsega preiskave.
However, a clear distinction between the imported pigskin leather footwear and Community production could not be made, as both show the same basic physical and technical characteristics and use.
Vendar jasno razlikovanje med uvoženo obutvijo iz svinjskega usnja in proizvodnjo Skupnosti ni bilo mogoče, saj imata obe enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabo.
Furthermore, the sales channels proved to be generally the same which was also reflected in the fact that consumers do not perceive pigskin leather shoes differently.
Dokazano je tudi, da so prodajne poti na splošno enake, kar se odraža tudi v dejstvu, da potrošniki čevljev iz svinjskega usnja ne dojemajo drugače.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva zavrnjena.
Patented technology footwear
Obutev s patentirano tehnologijo
One interested party claimed that certain patented technology footwear should be excluded from the scope of the investigation, i.e. a technology consisting of a special shock absorbing heel, a cushioning mid-sole and a special technology that increased the flexibility of this type of footwear.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je zahtevala, da se določeno obutev s patentirano tehnologijo izključi iz obsega preiskave, tj. tehnologijo, ki vključuje peto s sistemom blaženja udarcev, srednji podplat s posebnimi elementi za oblazinjene ter posebno tehnologijo, ki omogoča večjo prožnost te vrste obutve.
However, when comparing this footwear type with the product concerned, a clear dividing line could not be drawn with regard to the basic physical and technical characteristics and uses of this type of footwear and the product concerned.
Vendar pri primerjavi te vrste obutve z zadevnim izdelkom glede osnovnih fizičnih in tehničnih lastnosti ter uporabe jasne ločnice med to vrsto obutve in zadevnim izdelkom ter uporabo ni bilo mogoče določiti.
While it is acknowledged that a patented technology may contribute to increasing comfort it does not by itself substantially change the characteristics of being footwear for ordinary usage.
Priznava se, da lahko patentirana tehnologija prispeva k povečanju udobnosti, vendar pa sama po sebi znatno ne spremeni lastnosti obutve za običajno rabo.
Moreover, the fact that certain technology is patented is as such not a reason to justify its exclusion from the product scope.
Dejstvo, da je določena tehnologija patentirana, kot tako tudi ne upravičuje izključitve te vrste obutve iz obsega izdelka.
Hence, even though it is acknowledged that this product may have special features, it remains in competition with EC production of the product under investigation.
Čeprav se priznava, da ima ta izdelek posebne lastnosti, pa še vedno konkurira s proizvodnjo ES izdelka v preiskavi.
Non STAF sports footwear
Druga vrsta športne obutve, ki ni STAF
Certain interested parties claimed that all types of sports footwear, thus not only STAF and sports footwear within the meaning of subheading note 1 to Chapter 64 of the Combined Nomenclature, should be excluded from the proceeding.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so zahtevale, da se vse vrste športne obutve, ne le obutev STAF in športna obutev v smislu opombe 1 k tarifnim podštevilkam v poglavju 64 carinske nomenklature, izključijo iz postopka.
These allegations are based on the same claims made for the exclusion of STAF and the alleged shortage of certain non-STAF footwear on the EC market should these types of footwear not be excluded.
Te zahteve temeljijo na istih zahtevah o izključitvi obutve STAF in domnevnem pomanjkanju določene druge obutve, ki ni STAF, na trgu ES, če se te vrste obutve ne izključijo.
The latter claim was not substantiated with concrete evidence.
Slednja zahteva ni bila podprta s konkretnimi dokazi.
Therefore, no new compelling information was submitted to change the conclusion in recital 27 of the provisional Regulation regarding the remaining types of non-STAF footwear.
Nove informacije, ki bi spremenile sklep iz uvodne izjave 27 začasne uredbe v zvezi s preostalimi vrstami obutve, ki ni obutev STAF, torej niso bile predložene.
Consequently, the provisional conclusions, modified as set out under B. 1.1. above, are therefore definitively confirmed.
Začasni sklepi, spremenjeni, kot je pojasnjeno v točki B. 1.1 zgoraj, se zato dokončno potrdijo.
For the purposes of this proceeding and in accordance with consistent Community practice, it is therefore considered that all types of the product concerned should be regarded as forming one single product.
Za namene tega postopka in v skladu z običajno prakso Skupnosti se zato šteje, da so vse vrste zadevnega izdelka en sam izdelek.
Since no comments were received regarding the like product, the contents and provisional conclusions are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile predložene nobene pripombe v zvezi s podobnim izdelkom, se vsebina in začasni sklepi potrdijo.
In view of the above, it is definitively concluded that, in accordance with Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, the product concerned and all corresponding types of footwear with uppers of leather produced and sold in the in the analogue country Brazil, as well as those produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market are alike.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se dokončno sklene, da so v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe zadevni izdelek in vse ustrezne vrste obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, izdelane in prodane v primerljivi državi Braziliji, ter obutev, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti izdelala in prodala na trgu Skupnosti, podobni.
SAMPLING FOR EXPORTING PRODUCERS IN THE PRC AND VIETNAM
VZORČENJE ZA PROIZVAJALCE IZVOZNIKE V LRK IN VIETNAMU
Some parties argued that the samples were not representative given the exclusion of STAF and children's shoes.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da vzorci glede na izključitev obutve STAF in otroških čevljev niso reprezentativni.
As mentioned in recital 61 of the provisional Regulation, the exclusion of the STAF products did not influence significantly the representativeness of the sample.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 61 začasne uredbe, izključitev izdelkov STAF ni znatno vplivala na reprezentativnost vzorca.
As regard children's shoes, the argument is irrelevant in view of the decision to keep these types of shoes in the scope of the investigation.
Glede na sklep, da se otroški čevlji ohranijo v obsegu preiskave, utemeljitev v zvezi z otroškimi čevlji ni bistvena.
Comments were made with regard to the sample percentages as established in the context of provisional measures.
Pripombe so bile predložene v zvezi z odstotnimi točkami vzorca, kot so bile določene v okviru začasnih ukrepov.
These comments were taken into account.
Te pripombe so bile upoštevane.
Including children's shoes, it was established that the companies selected in the samples accounted respectively for more than 12 % and more than 15 % of the export quantities to the Community of the Chinese and Vietnamese cooperating exporting producers of the product concerned.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, vključujoč otroške čevlje, da so vzorčene družbe predstavljale več kot 12 % oziroma 15 % izvoznih količin zadevnega izdelka kitajskih in vietnamskih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Skupnost.
Consequently, the sample is clearly representative.
Zato je vzorec jasno reprezentativen.
Reference is also made to the arguments set out in recital 56 below.
Navaja se tudi sklic na utemeljitve iz uvodne izjave 56.
It was also claimed that the selection of the samples was inconsistent with the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement (‘ADA’), since certain major exporters were chosen at the expense of the companies with smaller or non existent EC sales, but relatively large domestic sales.
Trdilo se je tudi, da izbira vzorcev ni bila v skladu s Protidampinškim sporazumom STO, ker so bili nekateri glavni izvozniki izbrani na račun družb z manjšo prodajo ES ali brez nje, toda s sorazmerno veliko domačo prodajo.
As already explained in recital 60 of the provisional Regulation, the methodology applied intended to ensure the highest possible representativeness of the samples and to include within the largest representative volume of exports that could reasonably be investigated within the time available, some companies with representative domestic sales.
Kot je že pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 60 začasne uredbe, je bil namen uporabljene metodologije zagotoviti najvišjo možno reprezentativnost vzorcev ter v največji reprezentativni obseg izvoza, ki ga je bilo v razpoložljivem času mogoče razumno preiskati, vključiti nekatere družbe z reprezentativno domačo prodajo.
This should allow a calculation of normal value on this basis in case some sampled exporting producers would qualify for Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’).
Na tej podlagi bi bilo mogoče izračunati normalno vrednost, če bi bili nekateri vzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki upravičeni do tržnogospodarske obravnave („TGO“).
The samples were not selected in contradiction with the WTO rules nor with Article 17 of the basic Regulation according to which the sample must be either a statistically valid one or must include the largest representative volume of production, sales or exports which can reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Vzorci niso bili izbrani v nasprotju s pravili STO ali členom 17 osnovne uredbe, v skladu s katerim mora biti vzorec bodisi statistično veljaven ali pa mora vključevati največji reprezentativni obseg proizvodnje, prodaje ali izvoza, ki ga je v razpoložljivem času mogoče razumno preiskati.
Therefore, the above mentioned rules allow the use of sales, domestic and/or for export, as a selection criterion.
Zato zgoraj navedena merila omogočajo, da se domača prodaje in/ali izvoz uporabi kot merilo za izbor v vzorec.
Moreover, it is recalled that as explained in recitals 57 and 58 of the provisional Regulation, the authorities of the countries concerned gave their full agreement to the samples chosen.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da so se, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah 57 in 58 začasne uredbe, organi zadevnih družb v celoti strinjali z izbranimi vzorci.
Some interested parties also claimed that agreement on the composition of the sample for the PRC should rather have been sought with the authorities of Hong Kong and Taiwan, given that Chinese producers are largely owned by shareholders in these countries.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so tudi trdile, da se je treba glede sestave vzorca za LRK dogovoriti s hongkongškimi in tajvanskimi organi, glede na to, da so kitajski proizvajalci večinoma v lasti delničarjev iz teh držav.
Therefore, parties in these countries were allegedly concerned by the proceeding.
Zato naj bi ta postopek domnevno zadeval stranke v teh državah.
It is the consistent practice of the Community to seek agreement with the authorities of the exporting country and/or the associations of producers in anti-dumping proceedings where sampling techniques are applied, in accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
Ustaljena praksa Skupnosti je, da se sklepajo dogovori z organi države izvoznice in/ali združenji proizvajalcev v protidampinških postopkih, v katerih se uporabljajo tehnike vzorčenja v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, in the present case the State authorities of the countries concerned were in close contact with the associations of producers of the countries.
V tem primeru so bile državne oblasti zadevnih držav tudi v tesnem stiku z združenji proizvajalcev teh držav.
Exporting countries in the current proceedings are the PRC and Vietnam.
Državi izvoznici v trenutnih postopkih sta LRK in Vietnam.
Therefore, the agreement of these authorities on the sample compositions was indeed sought and obtained.
Zato je dejansko prišlo do dogovora teh organov glede sestave vzorca.
One non-sampled Vietnamese exporting producer reiterated its comments that since it had duly completed an anti-dumping questionnaire it should have benefited from individual examination.
En nevzorčen vietnamski proizvajalec izvoznik je ponovil svojo pripombo, da mu mora biti odobrena individualna preiskava, ker je ustrezno izpolnil protidampinški vprašalnik.
Nevertheless, the fact that a non-sampled party submits an anti-dumping questionnaire reply does not automatically lead to individual examination.
Dejstvo, da nevzorčena stranka predloži izpolnjen protidampinški vprašalnik, še ne pomeni avtomatično, da se ji odobri individualna preiskava.