natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, in December 2001 all employees were placed on mandatory leave for two to three weeks which, for employees who had already exhausted their annual vacation allowance, was unpaid (Micron post-hearing submission, 18 February 2003, p. 62).
Poleg tega so bili decembra 2001 vsi zaposleni za dva do tri tedne poslani na prisilni dopust, ki je bil za zaposlene, ki so že izrabili svoj letni dopust, neplačan. Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Microna, 18. februar 2003, str. 62.
In addition to these wage and benefit reductions, in February 2003 Micron was compelled to lay off 10 % (more than 1850) of its company-wide workforce (see Micron post-hearing submission), and Infineon ‘was obliged to reduce the number of employees in the fourth quarter of 2001 as a result of the losses related to subsidised imports from Korea.’ (Infineon post-hearing submission, 14 March 2003, p. 36).
Poleg znižanja plač in ugodnosti je moral Micron februarja 2003 odpustiti deset odstotkov (več kot 1850) vseh zaposlenih družbe (id.), Infineon pa „je moral zaradi izgub, povezanih s subvencioniranim uvozom iz Koreje, zmanjšati število zaposlenih v četrtem četrtletju leta 2001.“ Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Infineona, 14. marec 2003, str. 36.
Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation states that ‘[t]his list [of relevant economic factors having a bearing on the state of the industry] is not exhaustive, nor can one or several of these factors necessarily give decisive guidance.’
Člen 8(5) osnovne uredbe navaja, da „[t]a seznam [ustreznih gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na stanje industrije] ni izčrpen niti ni nujno, da je eden ali več navedenih dejavnikov odločilnega pomena.“
Report of the Panel, United States — Definitive safeguard measures on imports of certain steel products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, adopted December 10, 2003, as modified by the Appellate Body report (on other grounds), paragraphs 10.440 and 10.443.
… Kakor je razvidno iz zgornjega diagrama, ki je bil oblikovan z uporabo podatkov USITC, pa gibanja dobička iz poslovanja očitno niso odvisna od gibanja stroškov prodanega blaga.“ Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, Združene države – Dokončni zaščitni ukrepi pri uvozu nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, sprejeto 10. decembra 2003, kakor je bilo spremenjeno s poročilom pritožbenega organa (iz drugih razlogov), odstavka 10.440 in 10.443.
In particular, the Panel stated: ‘While … reluctant to prescribe what may amount to a reasoned and adequate explanation, the Panel considers that the USITC could have, for example, demonstrated that there was no linkage between demand declines during the period of investigation and injury suffered in this particular case.
Preiskovalni odbor je navedel zlasti naslednje: „Čeprav preiskovalni odbor ne želi predpisati nečesa, kar bi bilo mogoče utemeljeno in ustrezno razložiti, pa meni, da bi lahko USITC na primer dokazal, da ni bilo povezave med zmanjšanjem povpraševanja v obdobju preiskave in škodo, povzročeno v tem posebnem primeru.
More particularly, the USITC could have explained that operating margin, perhaps the most relevant injury factor in this regard, declined irrespective of demand trends.
USITC bi lahko zlasti razložil, da se je dobiček iz poslovanja, verjetno najpomembnejši škodljiv dejavnik v zvezi s tem, zmanjšal ne glede na gibanje povpraševanja.
This analysis could have been bolstered by an explanation that declines in operating margin coincided with increases in imports rather than declines in demand’ (emphasis added).
To analizo bi lahko podprli z razlago, da zmanjšanje dobička iz poslovanja sovpada s povečanjem uvoza in ne z zmanjšanjem povpraševanja“ (podčrtani del besedila je tu dodan).
Report of the Panel, United States — Definitive safeguard measures on imports of certain steel products, paragraph 10.558.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, Združene države – Dokončni zaščitni ukrepi pri uvozu nekaterih jeklenih izdelkov, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, sprejeto 10. decembra 2003, kakor je bilo spremenjeno s poročilom pritožbenega organa (iz drugih razlogov), odstavek 10.558.
They derived from the confidential questionnaire responses of companies cooperating with the original investigation, as verified, and publicly available external sources like Gartner Dataquest and In-Stat MDR.
Podatki so bili pridobljeni na podlagi zaupnega vprašalnika, na katerega so odgovarjali predstavniki družb, ki so sodelovali v prvotni preiskavi ter tudi na podlagi javno razpoložljivih zunanjih virov, kot sta Gartner Dataquest in In-Stat MDR.
GOK letter dated 13 February 2006; Hynix letter dated 14 February 2006; Infineon letter dated 13 February 2006; Micron letter dated 13 February 2006, with exhibits 1 to 27, including an Expert Report from Professor J. Hausman dated 13 February 2006.
Korejska vlada z dopisom dne 13. februarja 2006; Hynix z dopisom dne 14. februarja 2006; Infineon z dopisom dne 13. februarja 2006; Micron z dopisom dne 13. februarja 2006, z dokazi 1 do 27, vključno s izvedenskim poročilom prof. J. Hausmana z dne 13. februarja 2006.
The official stated: ‘If KorAm does not honour the agreement, we will not forgive the bank’ [19].
Uradnik je izjavil: „Če KorAm ne bo spoštoval dogovora, tega banki ne bomo odpustili“ [19].
He further stated that the FSS would take stern measures against the bank, such as disapproving new financial instruments and subjecting the bank to a tighter audit [20].
Dodal je še, da bo FSS proti banki strogo ukrepala, na primer z neodobritvijo novih finančnih instrumentov in strožjo revizijo banke [20].
In January 2001, UBS Warburg explained that Hynix's ‘debt refinancing agreement with KDB … merely puts off the evil day but does not solve (Hynix's) core problem, that it is not profitable and is not paying off debt at a sufficiently fast rate from internal cash flow or asset disposals’ [43].
Januarja 2001 je UBS Warbung pojasnila, da „dogovor Hynixa s KDB o refinanciranju dolga (…) zgolj prelaga temni dan za Hynix, ne rešuje pa njegovega ključnega problema, tj. da ni dobičkonosen in dolga ne odplačuje dovolj hitro z notranjimi denarnimi tokovi ali s prodajo sredstev“ [43].
UBS Warburg subsequently stated that Hynix's lack of product diversity was a concern and that Hynix's excessive focus on commodity DRAMs would contribute to its ‘deteriorating fundamentals’ throughout the first half of 2001 [44].
UBS Warbung je še dodal, da pomanjkanje raznovrstnosti izdelkov Hynixa zbuja skrb in da bo njegova pretirana osredotočenost na DRAM „zamajala njegove temelje“ v prvi polovici leta 2001 [44].
‘[T]he Panel does consider that the USITC was probably correct in concluding that changes in input costs were not a cause of serious injury.
„[P]reiskovalni odbor meni, da je USITC pravilno ugotovil, da spremembe vstopnih stroškov niso povzročile resne škode.
If, indeed, COGS played a significant role in [the] situation of the domestic industry, one would have expected operating profits to increase while COGS was decreasing … However, as can be seen from the graph below, which has been generated using USITC data, the trends in operating margin appear to be independent of trends in COGS.’
Če bi stroški prodanega blaga dejansko imeli bistveni vpliv na stanje domače industrije, bi se po pričakovanjih dobiček iz poslovanja povečal, stroški prodanega blaga pa znižali.
These so-called Option 1 banks were the KEB, Woori Bank, Chohung Bank, KDB, NACF and Citibank. Eight banks refused to extend new loans, so they swapped approximately one-third of their loans into equity and wrote-off the rest as a loss. The remaining banks objected to the restructuring and elected to receive the liquidation value of their loans, and had to write the remaining debt off as a loss. The loans remaining with the banks of the first category were subject to maturity extensions and interest rate cuts as explained above.
Pri bankah, ki so izbrale možnost 1, so bili podaljšani roki zapadlosti posojil in znižane obrestne mere v skladu z zgornjo razlago.
We consider that the standard of review in Article 11 of the DSU prevents us from embarking upon this exercise.’
Menimo, da zaradi meril o preiskavi iz člena 11 Sporazuma SIU tega ni možno izvesti.
The ‘target ratio’ for healthy firms is 2 or better, and a ratio below 1 ‘signals a firm in extreme financial distress.’
„Ciljno razmerje“ za podjetja, ki normalno poslujejo, je 2,0, ali še bolje, razmerje pod 1,0 „pomeni, da gre za podjetje v izjemno težkem finančnem stanju.
Expert report of Anthony Saunders, p. 12.
Izvedensko poročilo Anthonyja Saundersa, str. 12.
[47]. Another report stated that ‘Especially in the latter half of last year, it was nearly impossible for a company to issue junk bonds based on its own credit and the junk bonds market existed through primary collateralised bond obligations, collateral loan obligations and a government-initiated bond-refinancing plan.’ [48].
Njihov pogled lahko pritegnejo le družbe z močnimi denarnimi tokovi, zmožnostjo servisiranja dolgov in možnostmi za rast.“ [47] V nekem drugem članku je bilo objavljeno: „Zlasti v drugi polovici prejšnjega leta je bilo skoraj nemogoče, da bi družbe izdale ‚junk bonds‘ na osnovi lastnega posojila in trg ‚junk bonds‘ je temeljil na ‚kritih obveznicah‘ (‚primary collateralised bond obligations‘) ‚kritih posojilih‘ in na načrtu za refinanciranje obveznic, ki ga je osnovala vlada.“ [48].
The Commission recalls that, normally, having determined that the benefit is equivalent to the full amount of the financial contribution (in this case, a loan or loan guarantee), the Commission treats it as a ‘non-recurring’ subsidy and allocates it over a period of time corresponding to the normal depreciation of fixed assets in the industry concerned. The Commission uses a straight-line allocation and does not increase the total amount of benefit by using the ‘time value of money’ method; it merely adds interest to each annual allocated portion.
Komisija opozarja, da običajno po ugotovitvi, da je ugodnost enaka skupnemu znesku finančnega prispevka (v tem primeru posojila ali jamstva za posojilo), to ugodnost obravnava kot „enkratno“ subvencijo in jo porazdeli v določenem časovnem obdobju, ki ustreza običajni amortizacijski dobi sredstev v zadevni industriji Komisija pri razporeditvi uporablja linearno metodo in ne zvišuje skupnega zneska ugodnosti z uporabo metode „časovna vrednost denarja“; enostavno porazdeli obresti na enake dele za vsako leto.
The financial institutions were given three options by the CFIC in the 31 October meeting. The first option was to agree with the proposals by extending new credit and participating in a debt-to-equity swap (Option 1).
Na sestanku z dne 31. oktobra je CFIC dal finančnim institucijam tri možnosti.
No major change in this overcapacity situation has been observed during the period under consideration and in particular at the end of this period leading to the IP. This worldwide overcapacity may have asserted pressure on prices during the period under consideration, which may have contributed to the injury suffered by the Community industry.
V obdobju obravnave, zlasti ob koncu tega obdobja, ki mu je sledil OP, ni bilo ugotovljenih večjih sprememb glede presežne zmogljivosti Presežna zmogljivost po vsem svetu je mogoče povzročila obremenitev cen v obdobju obravnave, kar je mogoče prispevalo k škodi, povzročeni industriji Skupnosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 585/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 585/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 12. aprila 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 11 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 11. aprila 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 586/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 586/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 13. aprila 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 12 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. aprila 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 587/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 587/2006
In the week of 3 to 7 April 2006 applications were presented to the competent authorities in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 for import licences for a total quantity exceeding a country's delivery obligation quantity of ACP-India preferential sugar determined pursuant to Article 9 of that Regulation.
Zahtevki so bili predloženi zadevnim organom v tednu od 3. do 7. aprila 2006, v skladu s členom 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za celotno količino, ki presega obvezno količino za dostavo za zadevno državo, določeno v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003 za preferenčni sladkor AKP–Indija.
In the case of import licence applications presented from 3 to 7 April 2006 in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 licences shall be issued for the quantities indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženih od 3. do 7. aprila 2006 v okviru člena 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, se dovoljenja izdajo v mejah količin, določenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 18. aprila 2006.
Week of 3.4.2006-7.4.2006: percentage of requested quantity to be granted
% za dostavo zahtevanih količin v tednu od 3.4.2006–7.4.2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 588/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 588/2006
Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006.
Na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 580/2004 z dne 26. marca 2004 o določitvi postopka razpisa o izvoznih nadomestilih za nekatere mlečne izdelke [3] in po pregledu oddanih ponudb na razpis je ustrezno, da se določi največje izvozno nadomestilo za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 11. aprila 2006.
For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za stalni razpis, ki ga začenja Uredba (ES) št. 581/2004 za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 11. aprila 2006, je največji znesek nadomestila za izdelke iz člena 1(1) navedene Uredbe, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 April 2006.
Ta Uredba začne veljati 13. aprila 2006.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 409/2006 (UL L 71, 10.3.2006, str. 5).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 589/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 589/2006
Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006.
Na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 580/2004 z dne 26. marca 2004 o določitvi postopka razpisa o izvoznih nadomestilih za nekatere mlečne izdelke [3] in po pregledu ponudb, predloženih na razpis, je ustrezno, da se določi največje izvozno nadomestilo za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 11. aprila 2006.
For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 11 April 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 7,00 EUR/100 kg.
Za stalni razpis, ki ga uvaja Uredba (ES) št. 582/2004 za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 11. aprila 2006, je največji znesek nadomestila za izdelek in namembne kraje, navedene v členu 1(1) navedene Uredbe 7,00 EUR/100 kg.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati na dan 13. aprila 2006.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 590/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 590/2006
amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of countries and territories
o spremembi Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede seznama držav in ozemelj
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 lays down a list of third countries and territories from which movement of pet animals to the Community may be authorised, provided that certain requirements are met.
Uredba (ES) št. 998/2003 določa seznam tretjih držav in ozemelj, iz katerih se lahko ob izpolnjevanju določenih zahtev dovoli vnos hišnih živali v Skupnost.
That provisional list, which has already been amended several times, includes third countries and territories which are free of rabies and third countries and territories in respect of which the risk of rabies entering the Community as a result of movements from those third countries and territories has been found to be no higher than the risk associated with movements between Member States.
Navedeni začasni seznam, ki je bil že večkrat spremenjen, vključuje tretje države in ozemlja, proste stekline ter tretje države in ozemlja, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da tveganje za prenos stekline pri vstopu v Skupnost kot posledica premikov iz navedenih tretjih držav in ozemelj ni nič večje kot tveganje, povezano s premiki med državami članicami.
From information supplied by Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bulgaria, it appears that the risk of rabies entering the Community as a result of movements of pet animals from these countries has been found to be no higher than the risk associated with movements between Member States or from third countries already listed in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Iz podatkov, ki sta jih posredovali Bosna in Hercegovina ter Bolgarija, je razvidno, da tveganje za prenos stekline pri vstopu v Skupnost kot posledica premikov hišnih živali iz teh držav ni nič večje kot tveganje, povezano s premiki med državami članicami ali iz tretjih držav, ki so že navedene v Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003.
Therefore those third countries should be included in the provisional list of third countries and territories set out in part C of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003.
Zato se navedeni tretji državi vključita na začasni seznam tretjih držav in ozemelj, določenih v delu C Priloge II k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003.
In the interest of clarity the list of countries and territories set out in Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 should be replaced in its entirety.
Zaradi jasnosti je seznam držav in ozemelj, določen v Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003, treba v celoti nadomestiti.
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 998/2003 je treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga II k Uredbi (ES) št. 998/2003 se nadomesti z besedilom priloge k tej Uredbi.
DK Denmark, including GL — Greenland and FO — Faeroes Islands;
DK Danska, vključno z GL – Grenlandijo in FO – Ferskimi otoki;
ES Spain, including the Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla;
ES Španija, vključno z Balearskimi otoki, Kanarskimi otoki, Ceuto in Melillo;
FR France, including GF — French Guiana, GP — Guadeloupe, MQ — Martinique and RE — Réunion;
FR Francija, vključno z GF – Francosko Gvajano, GP – Guadeloupom, MQ – Martinikom in RE – Réunionom;
PT Portugal, including the Azores Islands and Madeira Islands;
PT Portugalska, vključno z Azorskimi otoki in Madeiro;
Member States other than those listed in Part A and points (a), (b), (c) and (e) of this Section.
Države članice, ki niso navedene v delu A in točkah (a), (b), (c), in (e) tega oddelka.
LI Liechtenstein
LI Lihtenštajn
AC Ascension Island
AC Otok Ascension
AG Antigua and Barbuda
AG Antigua in Barbuda
BA Bosnia and Herzegovina
BA Bosna in Hercegovina
TT Trinidad and Tobago
TT Trinidad in Tobago
US United States of America (including GU — Guam)
US Združene države Amerike (vključno z GU – Guam)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 591/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 591/2006
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Article 29(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov [1] in zlasti člena 29(1) Uredbe,
Annex III.A to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 [2] sets out the maximum quantity of cheddar cheese originating in Australia to be imported by quota period.
Priloga III.A k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 2535/2001 [2] določa največjo količino sira cheddar s poreklom iz Avstralije, ki se uvozi v posameznem kvotnem obdobju.
Council Regulation (EC) No 267/2006 of 30 January 2006 concerning the implementation of the Agreements concluded by the EC following negotiations in the framework of Article XXIV.6 to GATT 1994, amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff [3] provides for an additional allocation of 461 tonnes of cheddar originating in Australia under the annual import tariff quota.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 267/2006 z dne 30. januarja 2006 o izvajanju sporazumov, ki jih je ES sklenila po pogajanjih v okviru člena XXIV.6 GATT 1994, in o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2658/87 o tarifni in statistični nomenklaturi ter skupni carinski tarifi [3] določa v okviru letne uvozne tarifne kvote dodatno dodelitev 461 ton sira cheddar s poreklom iz Avstralije.
It is therefore appropriate to adjust the quantity of cheese under quota No 09.4521 referred to in Annex III.A to Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001.
Zato je ustrezno prilagoditi količino sira v okviru kvote št. 09.4521 iz Priloge III.A k Uredbi (ES) št. 2535/2001.
Since the yearly tariff quota concerned opens on 1 January, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2006 and should enter into force as soon as possible.
Ker se zadevna letna tarifna kvota odpre 1. januarja, bi bilo treba to uredbo uporabljati od 1. januarja 2006 in bi morala začeti veljati čim prej.
In Annex III.A to Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 the part relating to quota number 09.4521 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
V Prilogi III.A k Uredbi (ES) št. 2535/2001 se del, ki se nanaša na kvoto številka 09.4521, nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 316/2006 (OJ L 52, 23.2.2006, p. 22).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 316/2006 (UL L 52, 23.2.2006, str. 22).
OJ L 47, 17.2.2006, p. 1.
UL L 47, 17.2.2006, str. 1.
Annual quota from January to December (quantities in tonnes)
Letna kvota od januarja do decembra (v tonah)
Import duty (EUR/100 kg net weight)
Uvozna dajatev (EUR/100 kg neto mase)
Whole Cheddar cheeses (of the conventional flat cylindrical shape of a net weight of not less than 33 kg but not more than 44 kg and cheeses in cubic blocks or in parallelepiped shape, of a net weight of 10 kg or more) of a fat content of 50 % or more by weight in the dry matter, matured for at least three months
Celi sir cheddar v običajnih oblikah (v hlebih z neto maso ne manj kot 33 kg in ne več kot 44 kg in siri v hlebih ali siri v obliki kocke ali kvadra z neto maso 10 kg ali več) z vsebnostjo maščobe 50 mas. % ali več v suhi snovi, ki je zorel vsaj tri mesece
See Annex XI(B)’
Glej Prilogo XI(B)“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 592/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 592/2006