natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property
o zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pripomočkov in premoženja, ki so povezani s kaznivimi dejanji
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti členov 29, 31(1)(c) in 34(2)(b),
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Denmark [1],
ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Danske [1],
The main motive for cross-border organised crime is financial gain.
Glavni motiv čezmejnega organiziranega kriminala je materialna korist.
In order to be effective, therefore, any attempt to prevent and combat such crime must focus on tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscating the proceeds from crime.
Poskusi preprečevanja in boja proti takemu kriminalu so lahko učinkoviti samo, če so osredotočeni na sledenje, zamrznitev, zaseg in zaplembo premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji.
However, this is made difficult, inter alia, as a result of differences between Member States’ legislation in this area.
Vendar pa je to oteženo med drugim tudi zaradi razlik med zakonodajami držav članic na tem področju.
In the conclusions of the Vienna European Council of December 1998, the European Council called for a strengthening of EU efforts to combat international organised crime in accordance with an action plan on how best to implement the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam in an area of freedom, security and justice [2].
V sklepih Evropskega sveta na Dunaju v decembru 1998 je Evropski svet pozval k okrepitvi prizadevanj EU v boju proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu v skladu z akcijskim načrtom o tem, kako kar najbolje izvajati določbe Amsterdamske pogodbe o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice [2].
Pursuant to paragraph 50(b) of the Vienna Action Plan, within five years of the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, national provisions governing seizures and confiscation of the proceeds from crime must be improved and approximated where necessary, taking account of the rights of third parties in bona fide.
V skladu z odstavkom 50(b) Dunajskega akcijskega načrta se morajo v petih letih po začetku veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe nacionalni predpisi, ki urejajo zasege in zaplembe premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji, izboljšati in približati, kjer je to potrebno, ob upoštevanju pravic dobrovernih tretjih oseb.
Paragraph 51 of the conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999 stresses that money laundering is at the very heart of organised crime, and should be rooted out wherever it occurs and that the European Council is determined to ensure that concrete steps are taken to trace, freeze, seize and confiscate the proceeds from crime.
Odstavek 51 sklepov Evropskega sveta v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 poudarja, da je pranje denarja v samem središču organiziranega kriminala in bi ga bilo treba izkoreniniti, kjer koli se pojavi, in da je Evropski svet odločen zagotoviti, da se sprejmejo konkretni ukrepi za sledenje, zamrznitev, zaseg in zaplembo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s tem kaznivim dejanjem.
The European Council also calls, in paragraph 55, for the approximation of criminal law and procedures on money laundering (e.g. tracing, freezing and confiscating funds).
V odstavku 55 Evropski svet poziva tudi k približevanju kazenske zakonodaje in postopkov, ki zadevajo pranje denarja (npr. sledenje, zamrznitev in zaplemba sredstev).
Pursuant to Recommendation 19 in the 2000 action plan entitled ‘The prevention and control of organised crime: a European Union strategy for the beginning of the new millennium’, which was approved by the Council on 27 March 2000 [3], an examination should be made of the possible need for an instrument which, taking into account best practice in the Member States and with due respect for fundamental legal principles, introduces the possibility of mitigating, under criminal, civil or fiscal law, as appropriate, the onus of proof regarding the source of assets held by a person convicted of an offence related to organised crime.
Na podlagi priporočila 19 akcijskega načrta iz leta 2000 z naslovom „Preprečevanje in nadzor organiziranega kriminala: strategija Evropske unije za začetek novega tisočletja,“ ki ga je Svet potrdil 27. marca 2000 [3], je treba preučiti, če obstaja potreba po pravnem instrumentu, ki bi ob upoštevanju najboljše prakse v državah članicah in s polnim spoštovanjem temeljnih pravnih načel v kazensko, civilno oziroma davčno pravo uvedel možnost olajšanja dokaznega bremena glede izvora sredstev osebe, ki je bila obsojena za kaznivo dejanje, povezano z organiziranim kriminalom.
Pursuant to Article 12, on confiscation and seizure, of the UN Convention of 12 December 2000 against Transnational Organised Crime, States Parties may consider the possibility of requiring that an offender demonstrate the lawful origin of alleged proceeds of crime or other property liable to confiscation, to the extent that such a requirement is consistent with the principles of their domestic law and with the nature of judicial proceedings.
Na podlagi člena 12 o zaplembi in zasegu Konvencije ZN z dne 12. decembra 2000 proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu lahko države pogodbenice preučijo možnost zahtevati od storilca, da dokaže zakonitost porekla premoženjske koristi, ki je bila domnevno pridobljena s kaznivim dejanjem, ali drugega premoženja, ki ga je treba zaseči, kolikor je taka zahteva v skladu z načeli njihovega notranjega prava in z naravo njihovih sodnih postopkov.
All Member States have ratified the Council of Europe Convention of 8 November 1990 on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime.
Vse države članice so ratificirale Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 8. novembra 1990 o pranju, odkrivanju, zasegu in zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem.
Some Member States have submitted declarations with regard to Article 2 of the Convention concerning confiscation so as to be obliged to confiscate proceeds only from a number of specified offences.
Nekatere države članice so na podlagi člena 2 Konvencije predložile izjave v zvezi z zaplembo, ki jih zavezujejo, da izvajajo zaplembe samo na podlagi natančno določenih kaznivih dejanj.
The Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA [4] lays down provisions on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds from crime.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2001/500/PNZ [4] z dne 26. junija 2001 predpisuje določbe o pranju denarja, identifikaciji, sledenju, zamrznitvi, zasegu in zaplembi pripomočkov za kazniva dejanja in premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem.
Under that Framework Decision, Member States are also obliged not to make or uphold reservations in respect of the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention concerning confiscation, insofar as the offence is punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a maximum of more than one year.
Poleg tega države članice v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom ne smejo zahtevati ali ohraniti pridržkov glede določb Konvencije Sveta Evrope o zaplembi, če gre za kaznivo dejanje, za katero je najvišja zagrožena kazen odvzem prostosti ali nalog za pridržanje več kot eno leto.
The existing instruments in this area have not to a sufficient extent achieved effective cross-border cooperation with regard to confiscation as there are still a number of Member States which are unable to confiscate the proceeds from all offences punishable by deprivation of liberty for more than one year.
Obstoječi pravni instrumenti na tem področju niso v zadostni meri dosegli učinkovitega čezmejnega sodelovanja glede zaplembe, ker nekatere države članice še vedno ne morejo zapleniti premoženjske koristi, pridobljene z vsemi kaznivimi dejanji, za katera je zagrožena kazen odvzema prostosti za več kot eno leto.
The aim of this Framework Decision is to ensure that all Member States have effective rules governing the confiscation of proceeds from crime, inter alia, in relation to the onus of proof regarding the source of assets held by a person convicted of an offence related to organised crime.
Cilj tega okvirnega sklepa je zagotoviti, da imajo vse države članice učinkovita pravila, ki urejajo zaplembo premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem, med drugim v zvezi z dokaznim bremenom glede vira sredstev osebe, ki je bila obsojena za kaznivo dejanje, povezano z organiziranim kriminalom.
This Decision is linked to a Danish draft Framework Decision on the mutual recognition within the European Union of decisions concerning the confiscation of proceeds from crime and asset-sharing, which is being submitted at the same time.
Ta okvirni sklep je povezan z danskim osnutkom okvirnega sklepa o vzajemnem priznavanju odredb o zaplembi premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji, in delitvijo sredstev, ki je bil predložen istočasno.
This Framework Decision does not prevent a Member State from applying its fundamental principles relating to due process, in particular the presumption of innocence, property rights, freedom of association, freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media,
Ta okvirni sklep državi članici ne preprečuje uporabe njenih temeljnih načel v zvezi s pravilnim postopkom, zlasti glede domneve nedolžnosti, premoženjskih pravic, svobode združevanja, svobode tiska in svobode izražanja v drugih medijih
HAS ADOPTED THIS FRAMEWORK DECISION:
SPREJEL NASLEDNJI OKVIRNI SKLEP:
For the purposes of this Framework Decision:
Za namene tega okvirnega sklepa:
‘proceeds’ means any economic advantage from criminal offences.
„premoženjska korist“ pomeni katero koli gospodarsko korist od kaznivih dejanj.
It may consist of any form of property as defined in the following indent,
Zajema lahko kakršno koli obliko premoženja, kot je opredeljeno v naslednji alinei;
‘property’ includes property of any description, whether corporeal or incorporeal, movable or immovable, and legal documents or instruments evidencing title to or interest in such property,
„premoženje“ pomeni vsakršno premoženje, materialno ali nematerialno, premično ali nepremično, ter pravne dokumente in listine, ki izkazujejo pravni naslov ali pravni interes na takšnem premoženju;
‘instrumentalities’ means any property used or intended to be used, in any manner, wholly or in part, to commit a criminal offence or criminal offences,
„pripomočki za kazniva dejanja“ pomenijo katero koli premoženje, ki se uporablja ali ki je na kakršen koli način, v celoti ali delno, namenjeno storitvi kaznivega dejanja ali kaznivih dejanj;
‘confiscation’ means a penalty or measure, ordered by a court following proceedings in relation to a criminal offence or criminal offences, resulting in the final deprivation of property,
„zaplemba“ pomeni kazen ali ukrep, ki ga sodišče izreče po zaključku postopkov v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem ali kaznivimi dejanji, kar vodi k dokončnemu odvzemu premoženja;
‘legal person’ means any entity having such status under the applicable national law, except for States or other public bodies in the exercise of State authority and for public international organisations.
„pravna oseba“ pomeni vsak pravni subjekt, ki mu veljavno nacionalno pravo podeljuje takstatus, razen državnih ali drugih javnih organov, ki izvršujejo državno oblast, in javnihmednarodnih organizacij.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to enable it to confiscate, either wholly or in part, instrumentalities and proceeds from criminal offences punishable by deprivation of liberty for more than one year, or property the value of which corresponds to such proceeds.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, ki ji omogočijo celotno ali delno zaplembo pripomočkov za kazniva dejanja in premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji, za katere je zagrožena kazen odvzema prostosti več kot eno leto, ali premoženja v vrednosti, ki ustreza tej premoženjski koristi.
In relation to tax offences, Member States may use procedures other than criminal procedures to deprive the perpetrator of the proceeds of the offence.
V zvezi z davčnimi kaznivimi dejanji lahko države članice proti storilcu za odvzem premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem, uporabijo tudi nekazenske postopke.
Extended powers of confiscation
Razširjene pristojnosti za zaplembo
Each Member State shall as a minimum adopt the necessary measures to enable it, under the circumstances referred to in paragraph 2, to confiscate, either wholly or in part, property belonging to a person convicted of an offence
Vsaka država članica sprejme vsaj potrebne ukrepe, ki ji omogočijo, da lahko v okoliščinah iz odstavka 2 v celoti ali delno zapleni premoženje osebe, obsojene za kaznivo dejanje:
committed within the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Joint Action 98/733/JHA of 21 December 1998 on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation in the Member States of the European Union [5], when the offence is covered by:
storjeno v okviru kriminalne združbe, kot je opredeljena v Skupnem ukrepu 98/733/PNZ z dne 21. decembra 1998 o kaznivosti udeležbe v hudodelski združbi v državah članicah Evropske unije [5], kadar je kaznivo dejanje zajeto z:
Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA of 29 May 2000 on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro [6],Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA of 26 June 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime [7],Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings [8],Council Framework Decision 2002/946/JHA of 28 November 2002 on the strengthening of the penal framework to prevent the facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence [9],Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 on combating the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography [10],Council Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA of 25 October 2004 laying down minimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking [11],(b) which is covered by the Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism [12],
Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2000/383/PNZ z dne 29. maja 2000 o povečanju zaščite s kaznimi in drugimi sankcijami za ponarejanje v zvezi z uvedbo eura [6],Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2001/500/PNZ z dne 26. junija 2001 o pranju denarja, identifikaciji, sledenju, zamrznitvi, zasegu in zaplembi pripomočkov za kazniva dejanja in premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/629/PNZ z dne 19. julija 2002 o boju proti trgovanju z ljudmi [7],Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/946/PNZ z dne 28. novembra 2002 o krepitvi kazenskega okvirja na področju preprečevanja nudenja pomoči pri nedovoljenem vstopu, tranzitu in prebivanju [8],Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2004/68/PNZ z dne 22. decembra 2003 o boju proti spolnemu izkoriščanju otrok in otroški pornografiji [9],Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2004/757/PNZ z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o opredelitvi minimalnih določb glede elementov kaznivih dejanj in kazni na področju nedovoljenega prometa s prepovedanimi drogami [10],(b) ki je zajeto z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu [11],
provided that the offence according to the Framework Decisions referred to above
pod pogojem, da je za kaznivo dejanje po zgoraj omenjenih okvirnih sklepih
regarding offences other than money laundering are punishable with criminal penalties of a maximum of at least between 5 and 10 years of imprisonment,
glede kaznivih dejanj, razen pranja denarja, zagrožena najvišja kazenska sankcija najmanj 5 do 10 let zapora,
regarding money laundering, are punishable with criminal penalties of a maximum of at least 4 years of imprisonment,
glede pranja denarja zagrožena najvišja kazenska sankcija najmanj 4 leta zapora
and the offence is of such a nature that it can generate financial gain.
in da je kaznivo dejanje take narave, da lahko prinaša materialno korist.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to enable confiscation under this Article at least:
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da lahko po tem členu izvede zaplembo vsaj:
where a national court based on specific facts is fully convinced that the property in question has been derived from criminal activities of the convicted person during a period prior to conviction for the offence referred to in paragraph 1 which is deemed reasonable by the court in the circumstances of the particular case, or, alternatively,
kadar je na podlagi določenih dejstev nacionalno sodišče z gotovostjo ugotovilo, da zadevno premoženje izhaja iz kriminalnih dejavnosti obsojenca v obdobju pred obsodbo iz odstavka 1, ki ga sodišče šteje za primerno dolgo glede na okoliščine posameznega primera; oziroma
where a national court based on specific facts is fully convinced that the property in question has been derived from similar criminal activities of the convicted person during a period prior to conviction for the offence referred to in paragraph 1 which is deemed reasonable by the court in the circumstances of the particular case, or, alternatively,
kadar je na podlagi določenih dejstev nacionalno sodišče z gotovostjo ugotovilo, da zadevno premoženje izhaja iz podobnih kriminalnih dejavnosti obsojenca v obdobju pred obsodbo iz odstavka 1, ki ga sodišče šteje za primerno dolgo glede na okoliščine posameznega primera; oziroma
where it is established that the value of the property is disproportionate to the lawful income of the convicted person and a national court based on specific facts is fully convinced that the property in question has been derived from the criminal activity of that convicted person.
kadar se ugotovi, da je vrednost premoženja nesorazmerna z zakonitimi dohodki obsojenca in je na podlagi določenih dejstev nacionalno sodišče z gotovostjo ugotovilo, da zadevno premoženje izhaja iz kriminalnih dejavnosti obsojenca.
Each Member State may also consider adopting the necessary measures to enable it to confiscate, in accordance with the conditions set out in paragraphs 1 and 2, either wholly or in part, property acquired by the closest relations of the person concerned and property transferred to a legal person in respect of which the person concerned — acting either alone or in conjunction with his closest relations — has a controlling influence.
Vsaka država članica se lahko odloči tudi za sprejetje potrebnih ukrepov, ki ji omogočijo celotno ali delno zaplembo premoženja, pridobljenega s strani najbližjih sorodnikov zadevne osebe, in zaplembo premoženja, prenesenega na pravno osebo, ki jo nadzoruje zadevna oseba sama ali skupaj s svojimi najbližjimi sorodniki, v skladu s pogoji iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
The same shall apply if the person concerned receives a significant part of the legal person’s income.
Isto velja, če zadevna oseba prejme precejšni del dohodka pravne osebe.
Member States may use procedures other than criminal procedures to deprive the perpetrator of the property in question.
Države članice lahko proti storilcu za odvzem zadevnega premoženja uporabijo tudi nekazenske postopke.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that interested parties affected by measures under Articles 2 and 3 have effective legal remedies in order to preserve their rights.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da imajo zainteresirane strani, na katere vplivajo ukrepi členov 2 in 3, na razpolago učinkovita pravna sredstva za varstvo svojih pravic.
Safeguards
Jamstva
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental principles, including in particular the presumption of innocence, as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva ali spreminja obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki vključujejo zlasti domnevo nedolžnosti.
Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to comply with this Framework Decision by 15 March 2007.
Države članice sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom, do 15. marca 2007.
Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission, by 15 March 2007, the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Framework Decision.
Države članice do 15. marca 2007 pošljejo Generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta in Komisiji besedila določb, ki v njihovo nacionalno pravo prenašajo obveznosti, ki jim jih nalaga ta okvirni sklep.
In accordance with a report established on the basis of this information and a written report from the Commission, the Council shall assess, by 15 June 2007, the extent to which Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Framework Decision.
V skladu s poročilom, pripravljenim na osnovi teh informacij, in pisnega poročila Komisije Svet do 15. junija 2007 oceni, v kolikšni meri so države članice sprejele ukrepe za uskladitev s tem okvirnim sklepom.
This Framework Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta okvirni sklep začne veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ C 184, 2.8.2002, p. 3.
UL C 184, 2.8.2002, str. 3.
OJ C 124, 3.5.2000, p. 1.
UL C 124, 3.5.2000, str. 1.
OJ L 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1.
UL L 203, 1.8.2002, str. 1.
OJ L 203, 1.8.2002, p. 1.
UL L 328, 5.12.2002, str. 1.
OJ L 328, 5.12.2002, p. 1.
UL L 13, 20.1.2004, str. 44.
OJ L 13, 20.1.2004, p. 44.
UL L 335, 11.11.2004, str. 8.
OJ L 335, 11.11.2004, p. 8. [12] OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3.
UL L 164, 22.6.2002, str. 3.
Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2005/214/PNZ
on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties
o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 31(a) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 31(a) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden [1],
ob upoštevanju pobude Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska, Francoske republike in Kraljevine Švedske [1],
The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 endorsed the principle of mutual recognition, which should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the Union.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 potrdil načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, ki mora postati temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja tako v civilnih kot v kazenskih zadevah znotraj Unije.
The principle of mutual recognition should apply to financial penalties imposed by judicial or administrative authorities for the purpose of facilitating the enforcement of such penalties in a Member State other than the State in which the penalties are imposed.
Načelo vzajemnega priznavanja je treba uporabljati za denarne kazni, ki jih izrečejo pravosodni ali upravni organi, da bi olajšali izvršbo takšnih kazni v državah članicah, razen v državi, kjer je bila kazen izrečena.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the Tampere conclusions, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters [3], giving priority to the adoption of an instrument applying the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (measure 18).
Svet je 29. novembra 2000 v skladu s sklepi iz Tampereja sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah [3], pri čemer je dal prednost sprejetju instrumenta, na podlagi katerega se bo uporabljalo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni (ukrep 18).