natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to estimate the share of the liabilities linked to BNFL sites that originate from non-commercial activities, the United Kingdom had taken the approach that only financial liabilities still recognised by either the Ministry of Defence (MOD) or the UKAEA were non-commercial.
Združeno kraljestvo je za oceno deleža obveznosti, ki so povezane z lokacijami družbe BNFL in ki izhajajo iz negospodarskih dejavnosti, menilo, da so negospodarske narave le tiste finančne obveznosti, ki jih še vedno priznavata bodisi Ministrstvo za obrambo ali UKAEA.
Liabilities linked to assets with dual (commercial/non-commercial) use which were still not recognised by either the MOD or the UKAEA were attributed to BNFL's commercial activities, since BNFL was the operator and owner of these assets, even if they had been used by the MOD or UKAEA in the past.
Obveznosti, ki so povezane s sredstvi z dvojno (gospodarsko in negospodarsko) uporabo in ki jih Ministrstvo za obrambo ali UKAEA še vedno ne priznavata, so bile pripisane gospodarskim dejavnostim družbe BNFL, ker je ta bila upravljavec in lastnik teh sredstev, čeprav sta jih v preteklosti uporabljala Ministrstvo za obrambo ali UKAEA.
The estimated liabilities associated with sites then owned by BNFL, split between commercial and non-commercial activities, was as follows:
Naslednja tabela prikazuje ocenjene obveznosti, povezane z lokacijami, ki so bile takrat v lasti družbe BNFL, razdeljene na gospodarske in negospodarske dejavnosti.
Nuclear Liabilities to be transferred to the NDA, estimates as of March 2003, 2003 prices, discounted at 5.4 % nominal, amounts in billion GBP [4].
Jedrske obveznosti, ki naj bi se prenesle na NDA, ocena iz marca 2003, cene v letu 2003, znižane za 5,4 % v nominalni vrednosti, zneski v milijardah GBP [4].
Non-commercial
Negospodarske
Commercial
Gospodarske
Total Liabilities
Skupaj obveznosti
Magnox stations sites (except Calder Hall/Chapelcross)
Elektrarne Magnox (razen Calder Hall/Chapelcross)
Sellafield site (except Calder Hall station)
Lokacija Sellafield (razen elektrarne Calder Hall)
Springfields site
Lokacija Springfields
Capenhurst site
Lokacija Capenhurst
For physical assets, the economic value was considered to be equal to the cash flows that their continued operation was expected to generate.
Za opredmetena sredstva je veljalo, da je tržna vrednost enaka finančnim tokovom, ki naj bi se ustvarili z njihovim nadaljnjim upravljanjem.
Difference between commercial liabilities and assets value as of 31 March 2004, 2004 prices, discounted at 5,4 % nominal, amounts in billion GBP [6].
Razlika med gospodarskimi obveznostmi in vrednostjo sredstev na dan 31. marca 2004, cene v letu 2004, znižane za 5,4 % v nominalni vrednosti, zneski v milijardah GBP [6].
Total commercial nuclear liabilities
Skupaj gospodarske jedrske obveznosti
Magnox stations future cash flows
Prihodnji finančni tokovi elektrarn Magnox
Sellafield operations cash flow (THORP & SMP)
Finančni tokovi iz dejavnosti lokacij Sellafield (THORP in SMP)
Springfields future cash flows
Prihodnji finančni tokovi lokacij Springfields
Nuclear Liabilities Investment Portfolio
Investicijski portfelj za jedrske obveznosti
Magnox Undertaking
Zaveza Magnox
Other customer contributions not included above
Drugi prispevki strank, ki niso zajeti zgoraj
Cash and liquid assets
Gotovinska in likvidna sredstva
GROUNDS FOR OPENING THE PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA SPROŽITEV POSTOPKA
In the Opening of Procedure, the Commission first raised doubts as to which entity would be in receipt of State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je v okviru sprožitve postopka najprej sprožila vprašanje, kateri gospodarski subjekt bi bil prejemnik državne pomoči v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission took account not only of the situation of the NDA, which might receive direct payments from the State, but also that of BNFL, which could be relieved of charges that it might otherwise have had to bear under the polluter-pays principle.
Komisija je upoštevala ne le položaj NDA, ki lahko prejme neposredna plačila od države, temveč tudi položaj družbe BNFL, ki bi lahko bila oproščena stroškov, ki bi jih sicer morala nositi po načelu „onesnaževalec plača“.
The Commission then analysed whether such State aid could be found compatible with the EC Treaty.
Komisija je nato proučila, ali bi taka državna pomoč lahko bila združljiva s Pogodbo ES.
It expressed serious doubts that this aid was compatible under the guidelines on State aid for environmental protection.
Izrazila je resen dvom glede združljivosti pomoči s smernicami o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja.
It also expressed serious doubts that the aid could be found compatible with the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing or restructuring firms in difficulty.
Prav tako je izrazila resen dvom glede združljivosti pomoči s smernicami Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah.
The Commission then assessed whether such State aid could be found compatible in direct application of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, and in the light of the objectives of the Euratom Treaty.
Komisija je nato ocenila, ali bi taka državna pomoč lahko bila združljiva z neposredno uporabo člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES in glede na cilje Pogodbe Euratom.
The Commission took the view that such an approach could indeed be undertaken in principle, but also expressed doubts that the United Kingdom authorities had submitted sufficient proof that the positive impact of the aid on fulfilling the objectives of the Euratom Treaty outweighed its negative impact on competition in the internal market.
Komisija je bila mnenja, da bi se tak pristop načeloma res lahko uporabil, vendar je izrazila dvom o tem, ali so organi Združenega kraljestva predložili zadostne dokaze o tem, da so pozitivni učinki pomoči na izpolnitev ciljev Pogodbe Euratom prevladali nad njenim negativnim učinkom na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
Finally, the Commission raised doubts about the possible absence of State aid due to the fact that, before actual competitive procedures can take place, BNFL would act as SLC on a temporary basis.
Na koncu je Komisija izrazila tudi dvome glede morebitne odsotnosti državne pomoči, ker bi družba BNFL, preden bi se lahko izvedli dejanski razpisni postopki, začasno delovala kot SLC.
It considers that it is necessary to establish proper conditions for the final disposal of nuclear waste.
Družba EDF meni, da je treba ustvariti primerne pogoje za končno odlaganje jedrskih odpadkov.
As regards the financing of the decommissioning of nuclear sites, EDF considers that financial and industrial responsibility must go together and that proper funds must be set aside and secured during operation time.
V zvezi s financiranjem razgradnje jedrskih lokacij pa meni, da sta potrebni finančna in industrijska odgovornost in da je treba dajati na stran in zagotoviti ustrezna sredstva med obratovanjem.
EDF supports the Commission's actions to set up a Community-wide framework for solving such problems, and welcomes the fact that the Commission takes account of the Euratom Treaty in the matter.
Družba EDF podpira ukrepe Skupnosti za ustanovitev okvira za reševanje takih težav po vsej Skupnosti in odobrava dejstvo, da Komisija glede tega vprašanja upošteva Pogodbo Euratom.
BE welcomes the establishment of the NDA.
BE pozdravlja ustanovitev NDA.
It does not see the Measure as likely to have anti-competitive effects in its regard.
Po njenem mnenju ni verjetno, da bi sam ukrep imel protikonkurenčne učinke.
BE points out that it is also a customer of BNFL's current fuel supply and waste management activities.
Družba BE poudarja, da je tudi sama stranka družbe BNFL, kar zadeva trenutno dobavo goriva in dejavnosti ravnanja z odpadki.
After the transfer of these activities to the NDA and the tendering of their operation by the authority, it may well be that one of the selected new operators will be a competitor of BE.
Ko se bodo te dejavnosti prenesle na NDA, ki bo objavil razpis za njihovo upravljanje, se prav lahko zgodi, da postane eden od izbranih novih upravljavcev konkurent družbe BE.
BE is concerned by this situation where it could end up being a customer of one of its competitors.
Družba BE je zaskrbljena zaradi takšnega položaja, saj lahko postane stranka enega od svojih konkurentov.
BE also draws the Commission's attention to the fact that the setting up of the NDA and its analysis by the Commission should not endanger its own restructuring plan, as approved by the Commission.
Družba BE opozarja Komisijo tudi na dejstvo, da ustanovitev NDA in njegova proučitev, ki ga bo izvedla Komisija, ne sme ogroziti načrta družbe BE za prestrukturiranje, ki ga je odobrila Komisija.
BE goes on to explain that it does not believe that the Measure has any impact on trade as regards the supply of AGR fuel and reprocessing of AGR spent fuel because, even if BNFL's only EU competitor, AREVA, were to settle in the United Kingdom, BE would not be in a position to switch to it because it already has arrangements with BNFL for the lifetime requirements of its AGR stations.
BE tudi ne verjame, da ima ukrep kakršen koli vpliv na trgovino, kar zadeva dobavo goriva za plinsko hlajeni reaktor (AGR) in predelavo izrabljenega goriva iz plinsko hlajenega reaktorja. Tudi če bi namreč AREVA, ki je edini konkurent družbe BNFL v EU, ustanovil sedež v Združenem kraljestvu, se družba BE ne bi mogla preusmeriti nanj, ker ima že sklenjene ureditve z družbo BNFL za potrebe svojih elektrarn s plinsko hlajenim reaktorjem za celotno življenjsko dobo.
As regards Magnox power plants and the electricity market, BE believes that the Measure, even if it reduces BNFL's power plants' Short Run Marginal Costs (SRMCs), cannot have an effect on the price at which BE can sell its own nuclear and fossil output.
Kar zadeva elektrarne Magnox in trg z električno energijo, družba BE meni, da ukrep, četudi zmanjšuje kratkoročne mejne stroške elektrarn družbe BNFL, ne more vplivati na ceno, po kateri lahko BE prodaja svojo jedrsko in fosilno energijo.
Based on its own experience, BE also believes that the Measure will not artificially prolong the lifetime of BNFL's plants, since, still according to BE's estimates, these power plants should reasonably be in a position to cover their SRMCs.
Na podlagi lastnih izkušenj družba BE tudi verjame, da ukrep ne bo umetno podaljšal življenjske dobe elektrarn družbe BNFL, ker bi bilo po njenih ocenah upravičeno pričakovati, da so te elektrarne sposobne same pokriti svoje kratkoročne mejne stroške.
BE gives its view of the interactions between the EC and Euratom Treaties.
Družba BE je predstavila tudi svoje stališče glede povezanosti med Pogodbo ES in Pogodbo Euratom.
This aspect of the company's comments, though not easy to interpret, seems to suggest that only measures that are not necessary for or that go beyond what is necessary for achieving the objectives of the Euratom Treaty can be analysed under the EC Treaty.
Pripomb, ki jih je družba BE predstavila v zvezi s to temo, sicer ni lahko razložiti, vendar se zdi, da je mnenja, da se v skladu s Pogodbo ES lahko analizirajo samo ukrepi, ki niso potrebni oziroma ki presegajo tisto, kar je nujno potrebno za doseganje ciljev Pogodbe Euratom.
Greenpeace considers that the Measure includes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Greenpeace meni, da ukrep vključuje državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
It states that it is fundamental to ensure the safe decommissioning of nuclear sites, and equally fundamental that the polluter-pays principle should apply to the nuclear industry.
Navaja, da je bistvenega pomena zagotoviti varno razgradnjo jedrskih lokacij in da je enako pomembno, da načelo „onesnaževalec plača“ velja za jedrsko industrijo.
Greenpeace considers that the aid should not be found compatible with the common market.
Po mnenju Greenpeacea se pomoč ne bi smela obravnavati, kot da je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
It considers that the positive impact on the achievement of the safe and efficient management of nuclear liabilities does not outweigh the impact of the Measure on competition.
Po njegovem mnenju pozitivni učinki na doseganje varnega in učinkovitega upravljanja jedrskih obveznosti ne prevladajo nad vplivom ukrepa na konkurenco.
Greenpeace's submission is very substantial in size and includes many annexes.
Greenpeace je predložil zelo obsežne pripombe, ki vključujejo tudi številne priloge.
An important part of the comments relate to Greenpeace's scepticism about nuclear energy in general and the way it has been handled in Britain in particular.
Velik del pripomb se nanaša na Greenpeaceov dvom o jedrski energiji na splošno in posebej o načinu ravnanja z njo v Veliki Britaniji.
According to Greenpeace, nuclear energy entails very significant risks for the environment.
Greenpeace meni, da jedrska energija pomeni zelo velika tveganja za okolje.
Also, the reprocessing of nuclear waste, as opposed to direct disposal, would be a dangerous and costly option.
V nasprotju z neposrednim odlaganjem bi bila predelava jedrskih odpadkov nevarna in draga.
According to Greenpeace, BNFL, one of the most important actors of this sector in the United Kingdom and under public ownership, has been managed in a particularly hazardous and opaque way.
Greenpeace trdi, da se upravljanje družbe BNFL, ki je eden najpomembnejših akterjev v tem sektorju v Združenem kraljestvu v javni lasti, izvaja na zelo nevaren in nepregleden način.
Its accounts are difficult to analyse.
Njene računovodske izkaze je težko analizirati.
Poor management of cash and risky investments that have ultimately proved uneconomic have jeopardised the company's ability to fund its nuclear liabilities.
Zaradi slabega upravljanja z denarnimi sredstvi in tveganih naložb, ki so se na koncu izkazale za negospodarne, je bila ogrožena sposobnost podjetja za financiranje svojih jedrskih obveznosti.
Part of the provisions aimed at matching these liabilities are not liquid, or, as in the case of the Magnox Undertaking, are of a virtual nature.
Del rezervacij, namenjenih pokrivanju teh obveznosti, ni likviden, oziroma je, kot v primeru zaveze Magnox, virtualne narave.
Furthermore, BNFL has always underestimated its liabilities and overestimated its future income, which has worsened its position further.
Poleg tega je družba BNFL vedno prenizko ocenila svoje obveznosti in previsoko ocenila svoje prihodnje prihodke, kar je njen položaj še bolj poslabšalo.
Greenpeace submits a report that analyses and criticises BNFL's investment policy and accounts.
Greenpeace je predložil poročilo, v katerem analizira in kritizira naložbeno politiko in računovodske izkaze družbe BNFL.
As regards the Measure more specifically, Greenpeace contends that it should be looked upon as a way for the United Kingdom Government to restructure an ailing company — BNFL — by ridding it of its worst assets and the potentially unfunded liabilities attached to them, in order to allow it to stay on the market and continue as a successful company.
Kar zadeva sam ukrep, Greenpeace trdi, da ga je treba obravnavati kot način, ki omogoča vladi Združenega kraljestva, da prestrukturira podjetje v težavah (BNFL) tako, da ga osvobodi njegovih najslabših sredstev in potencialno nefinanciranih obveznosti, povezanih s temi sredstvi, in mu tako omogoči, da ostane na trgu in še naprej posluje kot uspešno podjetje.
Greenpeace also questions the nature of the future relationship between BNFL and the NDA.
Greenpeace izraža tudi dvom glede narave prihodnjih odnosov med družbo BNFL in NDA.
According to Greenpeace, with BNFL becoming an SLC for the NDA, it is difficult to tell which of the two entities is of a commercial nature.
Po njegovem mnenju bi bilo s tem, ko bi družba BNFL postala SLC za NDA, težko določiti, katero od teh dveh subjektov je gospodarske narave.
If it were the NDA, deriving profit from commercial activities would be contrary to its aim.
Če bi to bil NDA, bi bilo ustvarjanje dobička na podlagi gospodarskih dejavnosti v nasprotju z njegovim namenom.
Furthermore, because of this difficulty in deciding which of the two entities is actually the commercial one, it would be also very difficult to decide who is in receipt of State aid.
Ker bi bilo težko določiti, kateri od teh dveh subjektov je dejansko gospodarski subjekt, bi bilo težko določiti tudi, kdo od njiju je prejemnik državne pomoči.
Greenpeace adds that the NDA will probably be creating new waste with its operations, and that it is not clear whether it will set aside monies to pay for waste management.
Greenpeace dodaja tudi, da bo NDA s svojim poslovanjem verjetno ustvarjal nove odpadke in da ni jasno, ali bo dajal na stran denarna sredstva za ravnanje z odpadki.
Greenpeace also questions the future of Westinghouse, a company owned by BNFL but not transferred to the NDA.
Greenpeace prav tako izraža dvom o prihodnosti podjetja Westinghouse, ki je v lasti družbe BNFL, vendar ni preneseno na NDA.
Greenpeace questions the viability of Westinghouse without its parent's support.
Greenpeace dvomi o sposobnosti preživetja podjetja Westinghouse brez podpore njegove matične družbe.
The Commission understands that Greenpeace suggests that, should Westinghouse continue its operations as a part of the BNFL, the historic as well as future ties between BNFL and the NDA might result in a cross-subsidisation from the NDA to Westinghouse.
Komisija je razumela, da Greenpeace meni, da bi v primeru, če bi podjetje Westinghouse še naprej poslovalo v okviru družbe BNFL, lahko zgodovinske in prihodnje povezave med družbo BNFL in NDA povzročile navzkrižno subvencioniranje med NDA in podjetjem Westinghouse.
Greenpeace also fears that such a cross-subsidisation might affect the interests of Westinghouse's competitors in the nuclear reactor design business.
Greenpeace se boji tudi, da bi lahko tako navzkrižno subvencioniranje vplivalo na interese konkurentov podjetja Westinghouse na področju projektiranja jedrskih reaktorjev.
These cross-subsidisation concerns would be increased if, as Greenpeace suspects, there are plans to sell parts of BNFL to the private sector.
Še večja nevarnost navzkrižnega subvencioniranja pa bi bila prisotna, če bi obstajali, kot sumi Greenpeace, načrti za prodajo delov družbe BNFL zasebnemu sektorju.
Greenpeace goes on to consider the specific case of BNFL's reprocessing activities.
V nadaljevanju je Greenpeace posebej proučil predelovalne dejavnosti družbe BNFL.
Greenpeace challenges the United Kingdom authorities' argument that State support to these activities cannot affect trade because nuclear wastes are difficult to transport, and it would therefore be uneconomic for competitors to invest in new reprocessing assets in Britain.
Nasprotoval je trditvi organa Združenega kraljestva, da državna podpora za te dejavnosti ne more vplivati na trgovino, ker je jedrske odpadke težko prevažati in bi zato bilo za konkurente negospodarno vlagati v nova predelovalna sredstva v Veliki Britaniji.
According to Greenpeace, this disregards the fact that nuclear wastes do not necessarily have to be reprocessed, but can also be disposed of via direct storage.
Po mnenju Greenpeacea taka trditev ne upošteva dejstva, da ni nujno, da se jedrski odpadki predelajo, ampak se lahko tudi odstranjujejo z neposrednim skladiščenjem.
New investment in direct storage facilities would be a viable economic alternative to be offered by BNFL's competitors.
Nova naložba v objekte za neposredno skladiščenje bi bila izvedljiva gospodarska možnost, ki bi jo lahko ponudili konkurenti družbe BNFL.
Greenpeace also notes that, according to figures available to it, prices offered by BNFL in its fuel reprocessing contracts appear to be too low to cover costs.
Greenpeace iz podatkov, ki jih ima na voljo, ugotavlja, da se zdijo cene, ki jih družba BNFL ponuja v svojih pogodbah za predelavo goriva, prenizke, da bi pokrile stroške.
BNFL, and hence the NDA, would therefore generate even greater losses with these activities, creating the need for operating aid.
Družba BNFL in s tem tudi NDA bi zato s temi dejavnostmi ustvarila še večje izgube, kar bi povzročilo potrebo po pomoči za tekoče poslovanje.
To support this comment, Greenpeace quotes a figure of GBP 140000/tonne for fixed payments by BE to BNFL for managing its spent fuel.
Greenpeace kot dokaz navaja številko 140000 GBP za tono kot fiksno plačilo, ki ga družba BE plačuje družbi BNFL za ravnanje z njenim izrabljenim gorivom.
Greenpeace compares this figure to estimates of between GBP 330000/tonne and GPB 533000/tonne for the comprehensive management of such waste according to independent studies from the University of Harvard and NIREX.
Greenpeace to številko primerja z ocenami iz neodvisnih študij, ki sta jih opravila univerza Harvard in NIREX, ki navajajo od 330000 GBP/t do 533000 GPB/t za celovito ravnanje s takimi odpadki.
Greenpeace questions the forecasts for the operation of the SMP.
Greenpeace dvomi tudi o napovedih glede poslovanja obrata SMP.
SMP would be difficult to commission, and MOX fabrication would be a decreasingly attractive option for plutonium management.
Obrat SMP bi bilo težko usposobiti za zagon in proizvodnja mešanega oksidnega goriva bi bila vse manj privlačna možnost za ravnanje s plutonijem.
Regarding the Magnox plants, Greenpeace considers that their continued operation affects competition in the electricity market, in particular from renewable energies.
Kar zadeva elektrarne Magnox, Greenpeace meni, da njihovo nadaljnje poslovanje vpliva na konkurenco na trgu z električno energijo, zlasti iz obnovljivih energetskih virov.
Greenpeace also submits that Magnox spent fuel should be directly disposed of rather than reprocessed.
Greenpeace predlaga tudi, da je odlaganje izrabljenega goriva iz elektrarn Magnox primernejše kot njegova predelava.
COMMENTS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM ON THE OPENING OF PROCEDURE
PRIPOMBE ZDRUŽENEGA KRALJESTVA GLEDE SPROŽITVE POSTOPKA
The United Kingdom first recalls its commitment to nuclear decommissioning and clean-up.
Združeno kraljestvo najprej ponovno poudarja svojo zavezanost k jedrski razgradnji in čiščenju.
The United Kingdom views the establishment of the NDA as a unique means in Europe attempt to deal with historical nuclear liabilities in a systematic way.
Po mnenju Združenega kraljestva je ustanovitev NDA edinstveno orodje v prizadevanjih Evrope za sistematično obravnavanje zgodovinskih jedrskih obveznosti.
The NDA would be expected not only to make decommissioning safer and more efficient but also to pave the way for a real nuclear decommissioning market.
Od NDA se pričakuje, da bo ne le zagotovil varnejšo in učinkovitejšo razgradnjo, temveč tudi omogočil oblikovanje resničnega trga za razgradnjo.
The United Kingdom believes that the Measure does not constitute State aid to BNFL, since BNFL will no longer own any of the assets whose decommissioning costs may be funded in part by the State.
Združeno kraljestvo meni, da ukrep ne pomeni državne pomoči družbi BNFL, ker ta ne bo več imela v lasti nobenih sredstev, katerih stroške razgradnje lahko delno financira država.
The United Kingdom adds that the transition period during which BNFL will be SLC before SLCs can actually be selected by competitive procedures will not lead to any State aid to BNFL either, since all payments to the company in this period will be benchmarked against international comparators.
Združeno kraljestvo dodaja, da prehodno obdobje, med katerim bi družba BNFL bila SLC, preden bi se ti lahko izbrali prek razpisnih postopkov, ne bo omogočilo, da bi družba BNFL prejela kakršno koli državno pomoč, ker se bodo vsa plačila družbi v tem obdobju primerjala na podlagi mednarodnih primerjav.