natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annex, Article 5(e)
Priloga, člen 5(e)
Article 5(e)(i) and (ii)
Člen 5(e), (i) in (ii)
Annex, Article 6, introductory wording
Priloga, člen 6, uvodno besedilo
Article 6, introductory wording
Člen 6, uvodno besedilo
Annex, Article 6, first to third indents
Priloga, člen 6, prva do tretja alinea
Article 6(a) to (c)
Člen 6(a) do (c)
Annex, Articles 7 to 9
Priloga, členi 7 do 9
Articles 7 to 9
Členi 7 do 9
Annex, Article 10(1), introductory wording
Priloga, člen 10(1), uvodno besedilo
Article 10(1), introductory wording
Člen 10(1), uvodno besedilo
Annex, Article 10(1), first to fourth indents
Priloga, člen 10(1), prva do četrta alinea
Article 10(1)(a) to (d)
Člen 10(1)(a) do (d)
Annex, Article 10(2) and (3)
Priloga, člen 10(2) in (3)
Article 10(2) and (3)
Člen 10(2) in (3)
Annex, Articles 11 and 12
Priloga, člena 11 in 12
Articles 11 and 12
Člena 11 in 12
Annex, Article 13, first paragraph
Priloga, člen 13, prvi odstavek
Article 13, first paragraph
Člen 13, prvi odstavek
Annex, Article 13, second paragraph, introductory wording
Priloga, člen 13, drugi odstavek, uvodno besedilo
Article 13, second paragraph, introductory wording
Člen 13, drugi odstavek, uvodno besedilo
Annex, Article 13, second paragraph, first and second indents
Priloga, člen 13, drugi odstavek, prva in druga alinea
Article 13, second paragraph, points (a) and (b)
Člen 13, drugi odstavek, točki (a) in (b)
Annex, Articles 14 to 16
Priloga, členi 14 do 16
Articles 14 to 16
Členi 14 do 16
Annex, Article 17, introductory wording
Priloga, člen 17, uvodno besedilo
Article 17, introductory wording
Člen 17, uvodno besedilo
Annex, Article 17, first and second indents
Priloga, člen 17, prva in druga alinea
Article 17(a) and (b)
Člen 17(a) in (b)
Annex, Article 18, introductory wording
Priloga, člen 18, uvodno besedilo
Article 18, introductory wording
Člen 18, uvodno besedilo
Annex, Article 18, first and second indents
Priloga, člen 18, prva in druga alinea
Article 18(a) and (b)
Člen 18(a) in (b)
Annex, Article 19
Priloga, člen 19
Annex 1, point A
Priloga 1, točka A
Annex I, point A
Priloga I, točka A
Annex 1, point B, introductory wording
Priloga 1, točka B, uvodno besedilo
Annex I, point B, first paragraph
Priloga I, točka B, prvi odstavek
Annex 1, point B, first indent
Priloga 1, točka B, prva alinea
Annex I, point B, second paragraph
Priloga I, točka B, drugi odstavek
Annex 1, point B, subindents 1 to 4 of the second indent
Priloga 1, točka B, prva do četrta podalinea druge alinee
Annex I, point B, third paragraph, (a) to (d)
Priloga I, točka B, tretji odstavek (a) do (d)
Annex 1, point C
Priloga 1, točka C
Annex I, point C
Priloga I, točka C
concerning initiation of dispute settlement proceedings against India under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes and other relevant WTO provisions as regards an obstacle to trade constituted by an Additional Duty on imported wines and spirits and an Extra Additional Duty on imported spirits maintained by India, and a ban on sale of imported wines and spirits maintained by the Indian State of Tamil Nadu
o začetku postopkov za poravnavo spora proti Indiji v okviru Sporazuma o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov in drugih ustreznih določb STO v zvezi s trgovinsko oviro, ki jo povzroča Indija z ohranjanjem dodatne dajatve na uvožena vina in alkoholne pijače in posebne dodatne dajatve na uvožene alkoholne pijače, ter indijska država Tamil Nadu z ohranjanjem prepovedi prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994, laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community’s rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation [1], and in particular Articles 12(1) and 13(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o določitvi postopkov Skupnosti na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Skupnosti po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije [1], in zlasti členov 12(1) in 13(2) Uredbe,
On 20 July 2005, the Commission received a complaint pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 (the ‘Trade Barriers Regulation’).
Komisija je 20. julija 2005 prejela pritožbo v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 3286/94 („Uredba o trgovinskih ovirah“).
The complaint was lodged jointly by the Comité européen des entreprises vins (‘CEEV’) and The European Spirits Organisation (‘CEPS’).
Pritožbo sta skupaj vložila CEEV (Comité européen des enterprises vins) in CEPS (The European Spirits Organisation).
The complaint concerned certain alleged Indian trade practices that adversely affected the importation and sale of wines and spirits in India [2].
Pritožba je zadevala nekatere domnevne indijske trgovinske prakse, ki so negativno vplivale na uvoz in prodajo vin in alkoholnih pijač v Indijo [2].
These practices included an Additional Duty applied upon importation by India to wines and spirits, indirect taxes applied by certain Indian States to imported wines and spirits and restrictions on the sale of imported wines and spirits applied by certain Indian States.
Te prakse so vključevale dodatno dajatev, ki jo je Indija uporabljala pri uvozu vin in alkoholnih pijač, posredne davke, ki so jih uporabljale nekatere indijske države pri uvozu vin in alkoholnih pijač ter omejitve prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač, ki so jih uporabljale nekatere indijske države.
The complainants alleged that these practices were inconsistent with Articles II, III and XI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (‘GATT 1994’).
Pritožnika sta trdila, da te prakse niso v skladu s členi II, III in XI Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini iz leta 1994 („GATT 1994“).
On that basis, the complainants asked the Commission to take the necessary action.
Na tej osnovi sta pritožnika zaprosila Komisijo, naj ustrezno ukrepa.
Consequently, the Commission initiated that procedure after consulting with the Member States in the framework of the Advisory Committee, on 17 September 2005 [3].
Komisija je zato 17. septembra 2005 [3] sprožila postopek, potem ko se je posvetovala z državami članicami v okviru svetovalnega odbora.
During the examination procedure, the complainants withdrew the claims made in relation to indirect taxes applied by certain Indian States to imported wines and spirits, and India introduced a new Additional Duty (‘Extra Additional Duty’) which is applied upon importation to wines and spirits.
Med postopkom pregleda sta pritožnika umaknila zahteve v zvezi s posrednimi davki, ki jih nekatere indijske države uporabljajo pri uvozu vin in alkoholnih pijač, Indija pa je uvedla novo dodatno dajatev („posebna dodatna dajatev“), ki se uporablja pri uvozu vin in alkoholnih pijač.
In the framework of that procedure, the Commission therefore carried out an investigation of the Additional Duty, the Extra Additional Duty and the alleged restrictions on the sale of imported wines and spirits applied by certain Indian States.
Komisija je zato v okviru navedenega postopka izvedla preiskavo dodatne dajatve, posebne dodatne dajatve in domnevnih omejitev prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač, ki jih uporabljajo nekatere indijske države.
The investigation considered the relevant Indian legislation and took into account the views expressed by the various Indian Government Ministries, as well as Community and Indian enterprises and Trade Associations.
Preiskava je upoštevala ustrezno indijsko zakonodajo in mnenja, ki so jih izrazila različna indijska vladna ministrstva, podjetja Skupnosti in indijska podjetja ter trgovinska združenja.
The investigation concluded that the Additional Duty is inconsistent with Article II:1 of GATT 1994, and not justified under Article II:2(a) of GATT 1994, to the extent that it applies to wines and spirits, and that the Extra Additional Duty is inconsistent with Article II:1 of GATT 1994, and not justified under Article II:2(a) of GATT 1994, to the extent that it applies to spirits.
V preiskavi je bilo sklenjeno, da dodatna dajatev ni v skladu s členom II:1 GATT 1994 in ni upravičena po členu II:2(a) GATT 1994, kolikor se uporablja za vina in alkoholne pijače, posebna dodatna dajatev pa ni v skladu s členom II:1 GATT 1994 in ni upravičena po členu II:2(a) GATT 1994, kolikor se uporablja za alkoholne pijače.
Since the WTO Agreement prohibits these practices, there is evidence of an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Ker sporazum STO prepoveduje te prakse, obstajajo dokazi za trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The investigation also concluded that further analysis of the alleged restrictions on the sale of imported wines and spirits in certain Indian States was required.
V preiskavi je bilo nadalje sklenjeno, da se zahteva dodatna analiza domnevnih omejitev prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač v nekaterih indijskih državah.
An analysis conducted after the completion of the investigation showed that the legislation of the Indian State of Tamil Nadu contains a ban on sale of imported wines and spirits, which is inconsistent with Article III:4 of GATT 1994.
Analiza, ki je bila izvedena po zaključku preiskave, je pokazala, da zakonodaja indijske države Tamil Nadu vsebuje prepoved prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač, kar ni v skladu s členom III:4 GATT 1994.
Since the WTO Agreement prohibits this practice, there is evidence of an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Ker sporazum STO prepoveduje to prakso, obstajajo dokazi za trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The investigation showed that despite the elimination, in 2001, of quantitative restrictions on the importation of wines and spirits following dispute settlement proceedings against India under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, imports of wines and spirits from the EC decreased in 2002 and have since 2003 increased only in line with the overall growth in consumption in India of wines and spirits.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je kljub odpravi količinskih omejitev za uvoz vin in alkoholnih pijač leta 2001 po postopkih za poravnavo spora proti Indiji v okviru Sporazuma o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov uvoz vina in alkoholnih pijač iz ES leta 2002 zmanjšal in se je od leta 2003 dalje večal le v skladu s splošno rastjo porabe vin in alkoholnih pijač v Indiji.
The effects that reasonably could be expected to flow from the elimination of the quantitative restrictions have therefore not occurred, due to the application of the measures under investigation.
Učinki odprave količinskih omejitev, ki so bili razumsko pričakovani, se niso pojavili zaradi uporabe ukrepov, ki se preiskujejo.
The investigation showed furthermore that Indian total consumption of wines and spirits amounted in 2004 to respectively 0,67 and 87,1 million nine-litre cases, with an expected growth of between 5 % and 10 % per year over the next decade, and that less than 0,5 % per cent of spirits and less than 9 % of wines consumed in India are imported products, which are subject to the Additional Duty and the Extra Additional Duty.
Preiskava je nadalje pokazala, da je celotna poraba vin in alkoholnih pijač v Indiji leta 2004 znašala 0,67 in 87,1 milijonov zabojev po devet litrov s pričakovano rastjo med 5 % in 10 % na leto v naslednjem desetletju in da je v Indiji manj kot 0,5 % alkoholnih pijač in manj kot 9 % vin, porabljenih v Indiji, uvoženih izdelkov, za katere velja dodatna dajatev in posebna dodatna dajatev.
The investigation confirmed that there is a large potential market in India for imported wines and spirits, and that elimination of the Additional Duty for wines and spirits and of the Extra Additional Duty for spirits would entail a reduction in retail prices of imported wines and spirits of respectively 22 % to 35 % and 23 % to 48 % in different Indian States.
Preiskava je potrdila, da v Indiji obstaja velik potencialen trg za uvožena vina in alkoholne pijače in da bi odprava dodatne dajatve za vina in alkoholne pijače in posebne dodatne dajatve za alkoholne pijače povzročila znižanje drobnoprodajnih cen za 22 % do 35 % za uvožena vina in za 23 % do 48 % za alkoholne pijače v različnih indijskih državah.
A reduction of that magnitude would significantly increase demand for imported wines and spirits given Indian consumer preferences and the expected growth of the Indian market for wines and spirits.
Tako veliko znižanje bi znatno povečalo povpraševanje po uvoženih vinih in alkoholnih pijačah ob upoštevanju preferenc indijskega potrošnika in pričakovane rasti indijskega trga za vino in alkoholne pijače.
This evidence clearly shows that the Community industry has suffered and continues to suffer adverse effects within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Ti dokazi jasno kažejo, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela škodo, saj so nanjo vplivali (in še vedno vplivajo) škodljivi učinki v smislu člena 2(4) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The complainants represent a major sector of the economy of the Community, consisting of producers of wines and spirits in respectively 11 and 21 EC Member States.
Pritožnika predstavljata pomemben gospodarski sektor v Skupnosti, sestavljen iz proizvajalcev vin v 11 in alkoholnih pijač v 21 državah članicah ES.
Those producers exported in 2005 goods amounting to EUR 10,45 billion to some 150 third country markets and employed over 600000 people directly.
Ti proizvajalci so leta 2005 izvozili blago v vrednosti 10,45 milijard EUR na približno 150 trgov tretjih držav in neposredno zaposlili več kot 600000 oseb.
The investigation showed that the Additional Duty and the Extra Additional Duty has prevented producers within this sector from gaining access to the potentially large Indian market
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta dodatna dajatev in posebna dodatna dajatev preprečili proizvajalcem iz tega sektorja dostop do potencialno velikega indijskega trga.
On the basis of the above, it can be concluded that it is in the Community’s interest in the sense of Article 12(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation to take action, within the WTO framework, to seek a rapid removal of the Indian Additional Duty on imported wines and spirits, the Indian Extra Additional Duty on imported spirits and the ban on sale of imported wines and spirits in the Indian State of Tamil Nadu, which represent a breach of fundamental WTO rules and an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je mogoče skleniti, da je v smislu člena 12(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah v interesu Skupnosti, da v okviru STO ukrepa v prizadevanju za hitro odpravo indijske dodatne dajatve na uvožena vina in alkoholne pijače, indijske posebne dodatne dajatve na uvožene alkoholne pijače in prepovedi prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač v indijski državi Tamil Nadu, kar predstavlja kršitev temeljnih pravil STO in trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
It is also of utmost importance for the Community to ensure that WTO partners fully comply with their obligations, just as the Community is required to do.
Za Skupnost je nadvse pomembno tudi zagotovilo, da partnerji STO v polni meri spoštujejo svoje obveznosti, kakor se to zahteva od Skupnosti.
Attempts to resolve this dispute through numerous meetings with the Indian authorities since the introduction of the Additional Duty, the Extra Additional Duty and the ban on sale in the Indian State of Tamil Nadu, and throughout the course of this investigation, have failed to identify a willingness on the part of the Indian authorities to reach a mutually agreed solution.
Poskusi, da bi se ta spor razrešil v okviru številnih sestankov z indijskimi organi, ki so potekali od uvedbe dodatne dajatve, posebne dodatne dajatve in prepovedi prodaje v indijski državi Tamil Nadu in v celotnem času poteka te preiskave, niso pokazali pripravljenosti indijskih oblasti za sporazumno dogovorjeno rešitev.
In the absence of any likelihood that the Indian position will change, the initiation of a procedure within the framework of the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes is therefore deemed necessary.
Ker ni verjetno, da se bo indijsko stališče spremenilo, je potreben začetek postopka v okviru Sporazuma STO o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the TBR Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah –
The maintenance and application of an Additional Duty on imported wines and spirits and of an Extra Additional Duty on imported spirits by India, and the maintenance and application of a ban on sale of imported wines and spirits by the Indian State of Tamil Nadu appear to be inconsistent with India's obligations under the Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation and, in particular, under the provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and constitute an obstacle to trade within the meaning of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94.
Ohranjanje in uporaba dodatne dajatve na uvožena vina in alkoholne pijače in posebne dodatne dajatve na uvožene alkoholne pijače s strani Indije in ohranjanje in uporaba prepovedi prodaje uvoženih vin in alkoholnih pijač s strani indijske države Tamil Nadu niso v skladu z obveznostmi Indije v okviru Marakeškega sporazuma o ustanovitvi Svetovne trgovinske organizacije in zlasti z določbami Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini 1994 ter predstavljajo trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 3286/94.
The Community will initiate dispute settlement proceedings against India pursuant to the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes and the other relevant WTO provisions with a view to securing removal of the obstacle to trade referred to in Article 1.
Skupnost bo za zagotovitev odprave trgovinske ovire iz člena 1 proti Indiji sprožila postopke za poravnavo sporov v skladu s Sporazumom o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov in drugimi ustreznimi določbami STO.
The proceeding concerns wines, vermouths, aromatised wines and spirits classified under HS headings 2204, 2205, 2206 and 2208.
Postopki zadevajo vina, vermute, aromatizirana vina in alkoholne pijače, uvrščene pod tarifne številke HS 2204, 2205, 2206 in 2208.
They include still and sparkling wines, vermouths and other fortified wines such as port and sherry, and spirit drinks distilled from raw materials of agricultural origin such as brandies and wine spirits, whiskies, gin, vodka, rum and liqueurs.
Vključujejo mirna in peneča vina, vermute in druga alkoholizirana vina, kot sta portovec in sherry, ter alkoholne pijače, destilirane iz surovin kmetijskega izvora, kot so brandyji in vinska žganja, viskiji, gin, vodka, rum in likerji.
OJ C 228, 17.9.2005.
UL C 228, 17.9.2005.
establishing the composition of the Gas Coordination Group
o sestavi Koordinacijske skupine za zemeljski plin
Having regard to Council Directive 2004/67/EC of 26 April 2004 concerning measures to safeguard security of natural gas supply [1], and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/67/ES z dne 26. aprila 2004 o ukrepih za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe z zemeljskim plinom [1] in zlasti člena 7(2) Direktive,
Article 7(1) of Directive 2004/67/EC has established a Gas Coordination Group in order to facilitate the coordination of security of supply measure.
Člen 7(1) Direktive 2004/67/ES je zaradi lažjega usklajevanja ukrepov za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe ustanovil Koordinacijsko skupino za zemeljski plin.
This Group shall be composed of the representatives of Member States and representative bodies of the industry concerned and of relevant consumers.
Skupino sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic ter predstavniška telesa vpletene industrije in pomembnih odjemalcev.
It is necessary to establish the detailed composition of the Gas Coordination Group.
Določiti je treba tudi natančno sestavo Koordinacijske skupine za zemeljski plin.
In the light of the provisions of Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in gas and repealing Directive 98/30/EC [2], the following bodies of the industry concerned should be considered to be representative:
V skladu z določbami Direktive 2003/55/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. junija 2003 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z zemeljskim plinom in o razveljavitvi Direktive 98/30/ES [2] morajo biti kot predstavniška telesa plinske industrije upoštevani:
the representative European association of the large network operators, i.e. the transmission system operators in the sense of Article 2(4) of Directive 2003/55/EC,
predstavniško evropsko združenje široke mreže operaterjev, to je upravljavcev prenosnega omrežja v smislu člena 2(4) Direktive 2003/55/ES,
the representative European association of the gas supplying industry,
predstavniško evropsko združenje industrije za dobavo plina,
the international association representing gas producers in Europe.
mednarodno združenje, ki predstavlja proizvajalce plina v Evropi.
As for the relevant consumers, three main sectors consuming natural gas should be distinguished:
Med pomembnimi odjemalci je treba razločevati tri glavne sektorje, ki rabijo zemeljski plin:
the industrial sector representing 35 % of total European gas consumption,
industrijski sektor predstavlja 35 % skupne evropske porabe plina,
the power sector using gas as a fuel and accounting for 22 % of total European gas consumption, and
energetski sektor, ki uporablja plin kot gorivo in predstavlja 22 % skupne evropske porabe plina, in
the household sector representing 39 % of total European gas consumption.
sektor gospodinjstev predstavlja 39 % skupne evropske porabe plina.
Representatives of the bodies representing these sectors should therefore also participate in the meetings of the Gas Coordination Group.
Zato se morajo predstavniki teles, ki predstavljajo te sektorje, udeleževati sestankov Koordinacijske skupine za zemeljski plin.
Rules on disclosure of information by participants of the group should be provided for, without prejudice to the Commission’s rules on security as set out in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom [3].
Za sodelujoče v skupini je treba določiti pravila o razkritju informacij brez poseganja v predpise Komisije o varnosti iz Priloge k Sklepu Komisije 2001/844/ES, ESPJ, Euratom [3].
The Gas Coordination Group should help to facilitate coordination of security of supply measures at Community level in the event of a major supply disruption and may also examine and, where appropriate, assist the Member States in coordinating the measures taken at national level to deal with the major supply disruption.
Koordinacijska skupina za zemeljski plin mora pri večjem izpadu oskrbe olajšati usklajevanje ukrepov za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe na ravni Skupnosti, poleg tega pa lahko preverja in po potrebi pomaga državam članicam pri usklajevanju ukrepov na nacionalni ravni pri večjem izpadu oskrbe.
In addition, it should exchange information on security of gas supply on a regular basis, and should consider aspects relevant in the context of a major supply disruption,
Poleg tega mora redno izmenjavati informacije glede zanesljivosti oskrbe s plinom in preučevati vidike, ki so pomembni v primeru večjega izpada oskrbe –
Composition of the Gas Coordination Group
Sestava Koordinacijske skupine za zemeljski plin
Each Member State may nominate not more than two representatives from its competent authorities.
Vsaka država članica lahko imenuje največ dva predstavnika iz svojih pristojnih organov.
The representative bodies of the industry concerned are:
Predstavniška telesa zadevnih industrij so: