natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the Commission, on the basis of the declaration made by Bulgaria and Romania or the report from the independent body or its own audit findings, reaches the conclusion that deficiencies persist which are so serious as to affect the proper functioning of the overall system for the management and control of agricultural expenditure covered by the IACS and that, therefore, there remains an imminent risk of a serious breach of the functioning of the internal market, it should provisionally reduce for a fixed period of one year the monthly and intermediate payments to be made to Bulgaria and Romania under Articles 14 and 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Če Komisija na podlagi izjave Bolgarije in Romunije ali poročila neodvisnega organa ali svojih ugotovitev revizije ugotovi pomanjkljivosti, ki so tako hude, da vplivajo na pravilno delovanje celotnega upravnega in kontrolnega sistema kmetijskih odhodkov, zajetih v IACS, in da zato obstoja neposredna nevarnost za hujšo nepravilnost v delovanju notranjega trga, mora začasno za določeno obdobje enega leta zmanjšati mesečna in vmesna plačila, ki se izplačujejo Bolgariji in Romuniji v skladu s členoma 14 in 26 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
The provisional reduction should correspond to the percentage that the Commission applies in accordance with its own guidelines in the context of the conformity clearance if a Member State’s control system is gravely deficient and there is evidence of widespread irregularities.
Začasno zmanjšanje mora ustrezati odstotku, ki ga Komisija uporablja skladno s svojimi smernicami v smislu potrditve skladnosti, če je kontrolni sistem države članice zelo pomanjkljiv in je dokazana velika neskladnost.
Such a provisional reduction is necessary to make the State concerned remedy the deficiencies of its IACS so as to prevent or detect irregular payments and fraudulent practices and recover any unduly spent amounts, thereby eliminating the risk of a serious breach of the functioning of the Community’s internal market.
Takšno začasno zmanjšanje je potrebno, da se zadevno državo članico prisili odpraviti pomanjkljivosti IACS, da se prepreči ali odkrije nepravilna plačila in goljufije ter izterja neupravičeno izplačane zneske in s tem odpravi nevarnost za hujšo nepravilnost v delovanju notranjega trga Skupnosti.
The Commission should review after 12 months whether or not to continue with the provisional reduction of the monthly and intermediate payments.
Komisija mora čez dvanajst mesecev proučiti, ali naj nadaljuje ali preneha z začasnim zmanjšanjem mesečnih in vmesnih plačil.
The provisional reduction should be applied only in respect of support measures that are managed and controlled through IACS.
Začasno zmanjšanje se uporablja samo v zvezi z ukrepi podpore, ki se upravljajo in nadzorujejo s pomočjo IACS-a.
The provisional reduction should be followed up in the context of the conformity clearance procedure referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 and should be without prejudice to the decisions to be taken in that context,
Začasno zmanjšanje je treba spremljati v smislu postopka potrditve skladnosti iz člena 31 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 ne sme posegati v sklepe, ki se sprejmejo v tem okviru –
By the end of the third month following the accession, Bulgaria and Romania shall each make a declaration at ministerial level to the Commission stating whether:
Do izteka tretjega meseca po pristopu Bolgarija in Romunija na ministrski ravni predložita Komisiji izjavo, v kateri navedeta, ali:
the elements of the integrated administration and control system, hereinafter IACS, referred to in Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 have been set up within their respective territories in accordance with the relevant Community legislation, to the extent that they relate to the management and control of the aid regimes applicable in Bulgaria and Romania;
so na ozemlju zadevnih držav vzpostavljeni elementi integriranega upravnega in kontrolnega sistema, v nadaljnjem besedilu „IACS“, iz člena 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti tako, da se nanašajo na upravljanje in nadzor režimov pomoči, ki se uporabljajo v Bolgariji in Romuniji;
the IACS and the other elements necessary to ensure the correct payment of the support referred to in Article 3 of this Regulation are operational within their respective territories.
ali so elementi IACS in ostali elementi, potrebni za zagotavljanje pravilnega plačevanja podpore iz člena 3 te uredbe, operativni na zadevnih ozemljih.
The declaration provided for in paragraph 1 shall be made on the basis of a report established by a body which has the necessary expertise and is independent from the paying agency and the coordinating body referred to in, respectively, Article 6(1) and 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Izjava, določena v odstavku 1, se predloži na podlagi poročila, ki ga pripravijo organ, ki ima potrebno strokovno znanje in je neodvisen od plačilne agencije in usklajevalnega organa, navedenih v tem vrstnem redu v členu 6(1) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
Bulgaria and Romania shall each nominate the body delivering the report.
Bolgarija in Romunija imenujeta vsaka svoj organ, ki pripravi poročilo.
The report shall express an opinion on whether the requirements provided for in paragraph 1 are fulfilled.
V poročilu se izrazi mnenje, ali so zahteve iz odstavka 1 izpolnjene.
It shall be made available to the Commission.
Poročilo je na voljo Komisiji.
The Commission shall take a Decision provisionally reducing the monthly and intermediate payments referred to in Articles 14 and 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 by 25 % if it concludes, either on the basis of the declaration or the report referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation or its own audit findings, and after giving the Member State concerned opportunity to submit its comments within a reasonable period of time, that:
Komisija sprejme sklep o začasnem zmanjšanju mesečnih in vmesnih plačil iz členov 14 in 26 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 za 25 %, če ugotovi na podlagi izjave ali poročila iz člena 1 te uredbe ali svojih lastnih ugotovitev in po tem, ko je zadevni državi članici zagotovila možnost, da v razumnem času predloži svoje pripombe, da:
Bulgaria or Romania does not comply with its obligations under Article 1(1) and (2);
Bolgarija ali Romunija ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti iz člena 1(1) in (2);
the elements referred to in Article 1(1)(a) have not been set up;
elementi iz točke (a) člena 1(1) niso bili vzpostavljeni;
although the elements referred to in Article 1(1)(a) have been set up, the IACS or the other elements necessary to ensure the correct payment of the support referred to in Article 3 are so seriously deficient as to affect the proper functioning of the overall system.
čeprav so elementi iz točke (a) člena 1(1) bili vzpostavljeni, so IACS ali ostali elementi, potrebni za zagotavljanje pravilnega plačevanja podpore iz člena 3, tako zelo pomanjkljivi, da vplivajo na pravilno delovanje celotnega sistema.
Bulgaria and Romania shall take all the necessary measures to remedy immediately any deficiencies identified.
Bolgarija in Romunija sprejmeta vse potrebne ukrepe za takojšnjo odpravo kakršnih koli nepravilnosti.
The provisional reduction shall be applied in respect of the monthly and intermediate payments made from 1 December 2007 up to 30 November 2008.
Začasno zmanjšanje se uporablja v zvezi z mesečnimi in vmesnimi plačili, opravljenimi od 1. decembra 2007 do 30. novembra 2008.
The Commission shall prolong the provisional reduction for further periods of 12 months if one or more of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 continue to be fulfilled.
Komisija podaljša začasno zmanjšanje za dodatna obdobja dvanajstih mesecev, če je eden ali več pogojev iz odstavka 1 še vedno izpolnjen.
The provisional reduction shall be without prejudice to any reductions or suspensions pursuant to Articles 17 and 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Začasno zmanjšanje ne posega v druga zmanjšanja ali začasne prekinitve v skladu s členoma 17 in 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
The provisional reduction provided for in Article 2 shall be applied in respect of support granted under the following measures:
Začasno zmanjšanje iz člena 2 se uporabi v zvezi s podporo, dodeljeno z naslednjimi ukrepi:
the transitional simplified income support for farmers in the new Member States provided for in Article 143b of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 or the aid regimes referred to in Titles III and IV of that Regulation;
s prehodno poenostavljeno dohodkovno podporo za kmete v novih državah članicah iz člena 143b Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 ali z režimi pomoči iz naslovov III in IV navedene uredbe;
the complementary national direct payments provided for in Article 143c of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, financed under subsection E of section I of Annex VIII to the Act of Accession;
z dopolnilnimi nacionalnimi neposrednimi plačili iz člena 143c Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, ki se financirajo v skladu s poddodelkom E oddelka I Priloge VIII k Aktu o pristopu;
the payments provided for in points (i) to (v) of Article 36(a) and in points (i) to (v) of Article 36(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 [3] with the exception of those relating to the measures referred to in Article 39(5) of that Regulation and the measures pursuant to Article 36(b)(i) and (iii) as far as establishment costs are concerned.
s plačili iz točk (i) do (v) člena 36(a) in točk (i) do (v) člena 36(b) Uredbe Sveta (EC) št. 1698/2005 [3] z izjemo tistih, ki se nanašajo na ukrepe iz člena 39(5) navedene uredbe in ukrepe iz člena 36(b)(i) in (iii) kar zadeva stroške zagona dejavnosti.
Any decision taken on the basis of this Regulation or the absence of such a decision shall be without prejudice to the conformity clearance referred to in Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Kakršna koli odločitev, sprejeta na podlagi te uredbe, ali odsotnost takšne odločitve ne vpliva na preverjanje skladnosti iz člena 31 Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005.
This Regulation shall enter into force subject to and on the date of the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati le pod pogojem in z dnem začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1424/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1424/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating in India and the Republic of Korea
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene pri uvozu polietilentereftalatske folije s poreklom iz Indije in Republike Koreje
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/1996 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/1996 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“),
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 of 13 August 2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating in India and the Republic of Korea [2], and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1676/2001 z dne 13. avgusta 2001 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene pri uvozu polietilentereftalatske folije s poreklom iz Indije in Republike Koreje [2] ter zlasti člena 1(3) Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of polyethylene terephthalate film (PET film) originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz polietilentereftalatske folije (folije PET) s poreklom med drugim iz Indije v Skupnost.
Given the large number of exporting producers of PET film in India, during the investigation which led to the adoption of that Regulation (the original investigation) a sample of exporting producers was selected in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov folije PET v Indiji je bil med preiskavo, na podlagi katere je bila sprejeta navedena uredba („prvotna preiskava“), v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbran vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Individual dumping margins ranging from 0 % to 65,3 % were calculated for companies individually investigated and a dumping margin of 57,7 % was also calculated, in accordance with Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation, for cooperating companies not part of the sample.
Za posamično preiskovana podjetja so bile izračunane individualne stopnje dampinga v višini od 0 % do 65,3 %, poleg tega je bila za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso bila del vzorca, izračunana stopnja dampinga v višini 57,7 %, v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
Anti-dumping duties were subsequently imposed ranging from 0 % to 62,6 %, taking also into account the countervailing duties resulting from export subsidies imposed on the same products originating from India, which were then applicable by virtue of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [3].
Posledično so bile uvedene protidampinške dajatve v višini od 0 % do 62,6 %, pri čemer so se upoštevale izravnalne dajatve zaradi izvoznih subvencij, uvedenih na enak izdelek s poreklom iz Indije, ki so začele veljati z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2597/1999 [3].
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [4] (the amending Regulation), amended the level of dumping margins calculated by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 366/2006 [4] („uredba o spremembah“), spremenil stopnjo dampinga, izračunanega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1676/2001.
The new dumping margins range between 3,2 % and 29,3 % and the new anti-dumping duty range between 0 % and 18 %, again in order to take account of the countervailing duties resulting from export subsidies imposed on the same products originating from India, as modified according to Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [5], which has been adopted following an expiry review of Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999.
Nove stopnje dampinga znašajo med 3,2 % in 29,3 %, nova protidampinška dajatev pa znaša med 0 % in 18 %, pri čemer so se prav tako upoštevale izravnalne dajatve zaradi izvoznih subvencij, uvedenih na enak izdelek s poreklom iz Indije, kakor so bile spremenjene v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006 [5], ki je bila sprejeta po pregledu zaradi prenehanja veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/1999.
Furthermore, Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 sets the countervailing duty applicable to companies other than those individually listed in its Article 1(2) at 19,1 %, the export subsidy margin for those companies being calculated at the level of 12 %.
Poleg tega določa Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006 izravnalno dajatev v višini 19,1 %, ki se uporablja za družbe, ki niso navedene v členu 1(2), stopnja izvozne subvencije za te družbe pa znaša 12 %.
Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 366/2006, establishes three criteria, as detailed in recital (7) below, which, when met, give the possibility to Indian exporting producers which were not subject to anti-dumping measures following the original investigation to be granted new exporting producer treatment.
Člen 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 366/2006, določa tri merila, ki so natančno opredeljena v uvodni izjavi 7, ob izpolnjevanju katerih se indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere v skladu s prvotno preiskavo niso veljali protidampinški ukrepi, odobri obravnava novih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Applicants which are granted this treatment are attributed the same duty rate as the companies which had cooperated in the original investigation but were not included in the sample.
Vložnikom, katerim je bila odobrena ta obravnava, se pripiše ista višina dajatve kot družbam, ki so sodelovale pri prvotni preiskavi, vendar niso bile vključene v vzorec.
They are therefore subject to a duty which corresponds to the weighted average margin of dumping established for the companies included in the sample during the original investigation, being understood that any zero and de minimis margin are disregarded, pursuant to Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Zato zanje velja dajatev, ki ustreza tehtani povprečni stopnji dampinga, določeni za družbe, ki so bile med prvotno preiskavo vključene v vzorec, pri čemer se zanemarijo vse ničelne in de minimis stopnje v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
During the original investigation, the above mentioned weighted average dumping margin was calculated as the weighted average of the dumping margins of three sampled companies, since one of the four originally sampled companies had a zero margin.
Med prvotno preiskavo se je zgoraj navedena tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga izračunala kot tehtano povprečje stopenj dampinga treh vzorčenih družb, ker je imela ena od štirih prvotno vzorčenih družb ničelno stopnjo.
The weighted average margin of dumping so calculated in the original investigation was, as mentioned in recital (1), 57,7 %.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 1, je tako izračunana tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga v prvotni preiskavi znašala 57,7 %.
The amending Regulation reduces significantly the margin of dumping of the three above mentioned companies.
Uredba o spremembi znatno zmanjšuje stopnjo dampinga treh zgoraj navedenih družb.
The new weighted average margin of dumping, to be applied to companies fulfilling the requirements of Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, recalculated following the findings of the amending Regulation is therefore 15,5 %.
Nova tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, ki se mora uporabljati za družbe, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve člena 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, preračunana na podlagi ugotovitev uredbe o spremembi, znaša torej 15,5 %.
NEW EXPORTING PRODUCER REQUESTS
ZAHTEVE NOVIH PROIZVAJALCEV IZVOZNIKOV
The Indian exporting producer SRF Limited (the applicant) has applied to be granted the same treatment as the companies cooperating in the original investigation not included in the sample (new exporting producer treatment).
Indijski proizvajalec izvoznik SRF Limited („vložnik“) je vložil zahtevek za odobritev iste obravnave kot družbe, ki so sodelovale pri prvotni preiskavi in niso bile vključene v vzorec („obravnava novega proizvajalca izvoznika“).
An examination has been carried out in order to determine whether the applicant fulfils the criteria for being granted new exporting producer treatment as set out in Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, namely it was examined:
Da bi preučili, ali vložnik izpolnjuje merila za odobritev obravnave novega proizvajalca izvoznika, kakor je določeno v členu 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, je bila opravljena preiskava o naslednjem:
that it did not export to the Community the goods described in Article 1(1) of that Regulation during the original investigation period (1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000),
ali vložnik v obdobju prvotne preiskave (od 1. aprila 1999 do 31. marca 2000) v Skupnost ni izvažal blaga, opisanega v členu 1(1) navedene uredbe,
that it is not related to any exporter or producer in India subject to the measures imposed by the Regulation,
ali ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Indiji, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, uvedeni z Uredbo,
that it has exported the goods concerned after the investigation period, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community.
ali je izvažal zadevno blago po obdobju preiskave oziroma ali je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozi znatno količino v Skupnost.
A questionnaire was sent to the applicant which was also asked to provide evidence to demonstrate that it meets the three criteria mentioned above.
Vložniku je bil poslan vprašalnik, obenem pa je bil zaprošen, da predloži dokaze o izpolnjevanju zgoraj navedenih meril.
The applicant replied to the questionnaire and provided evidence that is considered sufficient to consider it as a new exporting producer.
Vložnik je izpolnil vprašalnik in predložil dokaze, ki se štejejo za zadostne za obravnavanje vložnika kot novega proizvajalca izvoznika.
The anti-dumping duty rate applicable to the applicant should be based on the weighted average margin of dumping established for the parties selected in the sample in the original investigation, as modified following the amending Regulation, i.e. 15,5 %, as indicated in recital (5) above.
Protidampinška stopnja, ki se uporablja za vložnika, mora temeljiti na tehtani povprečni dampinški stopnji, ki je bila določena za stranke, izbrane v vzorcu v originalni preiskavi, kakor je bila spremenjena v skladu z uredbo o spremembi, tj. 15,5 %, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 5.
Since, pursuant to Article 14(1) of the basic Regulation, no product shall be subject to both anti-dumping and countervailing duties for the purpose of dealing with one and the same situation arising from dumping or from the provision of export subsidies, this duty rate is to be reduced by the applicant’s export subsidy margin as ascertained in the anti-subsidy investigation which led to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 (see recital (59) of Regulation (EC) No 366/2006).
Ker v skladu s členom 14(1) osnovne uredbe za noben izdelek ne smejo hkrati veljati protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za obravnavanje iste situacije, ki izhaja iz dampinga ali iz subvencioniranega izvoza, se navedena stopnja dajatve zmanjša za stopnjo izvozne subvencije vložnika, ugotovljeno v protisubvencijski preiskavi, na podlagi katere je bila sprejeta Uredba (ES) št. 367/2006 (glej uvodno izjavo 59 Uredbe (ES) št. 366/2006).
Since the applicant does not have an individual countervailing duty, the duty rate established for all other companies should apply.
Ker za vložnika ne velja individualna izravnalna dajatev, se uporablja stopnja dajatve, ki je bila določena za vse druge družbe.
The anti-dumping duty rate applicable to the applicant should therefore be calculated as indicated in the table below.
Stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za vložnika, se mora zato izračunati v skladu z navedbami iz spodnje tabele.
Total subsidy margin
Skupna stopnja subvencije
The applicant and the Community industry have been informed of the findings of the examination and have had the opportunity to submit their comments.
Vložnik in industrija Skupnosti so bili seznanjeni z ugotovitvami preiskave in so imeli možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
The applicant submitted comments on the calculation of the margin of dumping.
Vložnik je predložil pripombe glede izračuna stopnje dampinga.
These comments have been taken into account and are reflected in the above.
Te pripombe so bile upoštevane in se odražajo zgoraj.
All other arguments and submissions made by the parties were analysed and duly taken into account where warranted.
Vsi argumenti in predlogi strank so bili analizirani in upoštevani, kadar so bili utemeljeni –
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be as follows for products originating in:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke s poreklom iz spodaj navedenih družb:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006 (OJ L 236, 31.8.2006, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006 (UL L 236, 31.8.2006, str. 1).
Regarding the Republic of Korea this Regulation has expired on 24 August 2006 (OJ C 199, 24.8.2006, p. 8).
Za Republiko Korejo je ta uredba prenehala veljati 24. avgusta 2006 (UL C 199, 24.8.2006, str. 8).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1288/2006.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1288/2006.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1425/2006