natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since Belarus is considered a non-market economy country, the Commission had to determine the normal value in this case on the basis of data obtained from producers in a market economy third country, in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Ker se Belorusija obravnava kot država z netržnim gospodarstvom, je morala Komisija v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe v tem primeru določiti normalno vrednost na podlagi podatkov proizvajalcev v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom.
In the notice of initiation, Canada was envisaged as an appropriate analogue country.
V obvestilu o začetku je bila Kanada predvidena kot ustrezna primerljiva država.
Canada was also the analogue country used in all previous investigations in this proceeding.
Kanada je bila kot primerljiva država uporabljena tudi v prejšnjih preiskavah v tem postopku.
All interested parties were given the opportunity to comment on the choice of the analogue country.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost predložiti svoje stališče o izbiri primerljive države.
The Belarusian authorities argued that Russia would be a more suitable analogue country than Canada because, after the previous investigation, Russia has been acknowledged as a market economy country by the Community.
Beloruski organi so menili, da bi bila Rusija ustreznejša primerljiva država od Kanade, ker je po prejšnji preiskavi Skupnost Rusijo priznala kot državo s tržnim gospodarstvom.
Furthermore, it was alleged that the Canadian domestic market is not more competitive than that of Russia.
Poleg tega se je domnevalo, da kanadski notranji trg ni konkurenčnejši od ruskega.
Finally, they alleged that one of the major Canadian producers is related through a third company to some producers in the Community and, therefore, it would not be appropriate to calculate the normal value for Belarus on the basis of information provided by Canadian companies.
Nazadnje so trdili, da je eden glavnih kanadskih proizvajalcev povezan prek tretje družbe z nekaterimi proizvajalci v Skupnosti in zato ne bi bilo primerno izračunati normalne vrednosti za Belorusijo na podlagi informacij, ki so jih zagotovile kanadske družbe.
Furthermore the Belarusian authorities suggested that Russia should be selected as the analogue country because (i) the Belarusian and Russian potash producers used to be part of one industry in the USSR period, (ii) the Russian potash industry has a level of development which is most comparable to that of Belarus, and (iii) the production volume in Russia is more comparable to Belarus than that of Canada.
Poleg tega so Beloruski organi želeli, da se Rusija izbere za primerljivo državo, ker so bili (i) beloruski in ruski proizvajalci pepelike v obdobju ZSSR del ene industrije, (ii) ker je ruska industrija pepelike na ravni razvoja, ki je najbolj primerljiva z belorusko, in (iii) ker je obseg proizvodnje v Rusiji bolj primerljiv z beloruskim kot kanadski.
Moreover, Russia would be a more suitable choice as an analogue country because access to raw materials and labour costs in Russia are comparable to these conditions in Belarus.
Rusija bi bila tudi primernejša izbira za primerljivo državo, ker so dostop do surovin in stroški dela v Rusiji primerljivi z razmerami v Belorusiji.
Finally, it was claimed that Russia should be selected since the Russian exporting producers are taking part in the expiry review and the risk of non-cooperation by the Russian companies is negligible.
Nazadnje so zahtevali, da se mora izbrati Rusijo, ker ruski proizvajalci izvozniki sodelujejo pri pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa in je tveganje za nesodelovanje ruskih družb zanemarljivo.
Belaruskali alleged that comparability between the access to raw materials and production process in Canada and Belarus was not sufficiently substantiated.
Belaruskali je trdil, da primerljivost med dostopom do surovin in proizvodnim procesom v Kanadi in Belorusiji ni bila dovolj utemeljena.
Moreover, it alleged that the fact that Canada is the largest producer of potash is of no direct relevance to the selection of the analogue country and that selection of Russia for this purpose would be more suitable.
Poleg tega je trdil, da dejstvo, da je Kanada največji proizvajalec pepelike, nima neposredne povezave z izbiro primerljive države in da bi bila izbira Rusije zaradi tega primernejša.
The Community industry claimed that the Belarusian and the Canadian mines are comparable in respect of cost structure and efficiency and that the access to raw materials is largely similar in both countries.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da so beloruski in kanadski rudniki primerljivi glede stroškovne strukture in učinkovitosti ter da je dostop do surovin v obeh državah zelo podoben.
Furthermore, it claimed that the potash prices in Canada are governed by normal market forces and are not distorted by market isolation or by other factors.
Poleg tega je tudi trdila, da se cene pepelike v Kanadi uravnavajo z normalnimi tržnimi silami in niso izkrivljene zaradi izolacije trga ali drugih dejavnikov.
Moreover, the Community industry alleged that there are clear indications that some cost factors in Russia do not represent correctly the real cost situation and would need to be adjusted in any event.
Industrija Skupnosti je tudi trdila, da obstajajo jasni znaki, da nekateri stroškovni dejavniki v Rusiji ne predstavljajo dejanskih razmer pravilno in bi jih bilo treba v vsakem primeru prilagoditi.
Finally, it was submitted that there is a close relationship between at least one of the Russian producers of potash and the Belarusian producer via a joint sales company and, therefore, this company would have an interest to demonstrate a low normal value on the Russian market.
Nazadnje so trdili, da najmanj en ruski proizvajalec pepelike in beloruski proizvajalec tesno sodelujeta prek skupne prodajne družbe in bi zato ta družba lahko želela prikazati nizke normalne vrednosti na ruskem trgu.
As regards the claims made concerning the suitability of Canada to be used as an analogue country, it has to be recalled that the normal values for Belarus have been established by using Canada as a suitable analogue country in the previous investigations in the same proceeding and that there is no evidence indicating that this choice would no longer be appropriate.
V zvezi s trditvami, ki zadevajo ustreznost Kanade kot primerljive države, je treba opozoriti, da so bile normalne vrednosti za Belorusijo določene z upoštevanjem Kanade kot ustrezne primerljive države v prejšnjih preiskavah v enakem postopku in da ni dokaza, ki bi navajal, da ta izbira ni več ustrezna.
Furthermore, it is recalled that Canada is the main producer and exporter of potash world-wide, ahead of Belarus and Russia.
Poleg tega se opozarja, da je Kanada ena glavnih svetovnih proizvajalk in izvoznic pepelike, pred Belorusijo in Rusijo.
With regard to the competition on the Canadian market and the Russian market, it was found that both in terms of production and of the number of operators the Canadian market is at least as competitive as the Russian market.
V zvezi s konkurenčnostjo na kanadskem in ruskem trgu je bilo ugotovljeno, da je glede proizvodnje in števila družb kanadski trg vsaj tako konkurenčen kot ruski.
Furthermore, the investigation showed that no duties or other limitations apply to the imports of potash into Canada.
Nadalje je preiskava pokazala, da za uvoz pepelike v Kanado ne veljajo nobene carine ali druge omejitve.
With regard to the manufacturing process and access to raw materials, it is to be recalled that the previous investigations have already established that the manufacturing process and access to raw materials are, to a large extent, similar in Canada and in Belarus and no evidence has been put forward indicating that this would have changed.
V zvezi s proizvodnim postopkom in dostopom do surovin je treba opozoriti, da so prejšnje preiskave že potrdile, da sta si proizvodni postopki in dostop do surovin v Kanadi in Belorusiji večinoma podobna ter da ni bil predložen noben dokaz, ki navaja spremembo.
As regards the appropriateness of Russia to be used as the analogue country, it was concluded that no compelling reasons were presented by the parties why the information obtained from the Russian market instead of that of the Canadian market should be used as a better basis for establishing the normal value of potash in Belarus.
V zvezi z ustreznostjo Rusije kot primerljive države je bilo sklenjeno, da stranke niso predstavile nobenih nujnih razlogov, zakaj je treba kot boljšo podlago za določanje normalne vrednosti pepelike v Belorusiji uporabiti informacije z ruskega in ne s kanadskega trga.
In this regard, it has to be recalled that certain cost elements in Russia were not reasonably reflected in the cost of production of the Russian producers and that these cost elements had to be adjusted in significant amounts as explained in recital 54.
Pri tem je treba opozoriti, da nekateri stroškovni elementi v Rusiji niso bili upravičeno prikazani v proizvodnih stroških ruskih proizvajalcev in da je te stroškovne elemente v znatnih količinah treba prilagoditi, kot pojasnjuje uvodna izjava 54.
However, it was considered that the relationship of one Russian producer with the Belarusian producer would not necessarily have been preclusive to the possible selection of Russia as the analogue country.
Vendar se je oblikovalo mnenje, da sodelovanje enega ruskega proizvajalca z beloruskim proizvajalcem ne bi nujno onemogočilo morebitnega izbora Rusije za primerljivo državo.
The claim that the Russian company would have an interest in demonstrating a low normal value ignores the fact that data used in, inter alia, analogue countries is subject to strict scrutiny before it can be used.
Trditev, da bi ruska družba želela prikazati nizko normalno vrednost, ne upošteva dejstva, da so podatki, ki se med drugim uporabljajo v primerljivih državah, pred uporabo temeljito pregledani.
The institutions took note of the allegations presented by the Belarusian authorities concerning the relationship between at least one producer in the analogue country and the Community producers.
Institucije so se seznanile s predstavljenimi trditvami beloruskih organov v zvezi z odnosom med najmanj enim proizvajalcem v primerljivi državi in proizvajalci v Skupnosti.
Consequently, it was examined if such relationship existed between the companies providing the information in Canada and the Community producers.
Preverjeno je bilo, ali je takšen odnos med družbami, ki so zagotovile informacije v Kanadi, in proizvajalci v Skupnosti res obstajal.
In this regard, the investigation showed that one Canadian producer providing the necessary information was indirectly related to some producers in the Community.
V tej zvezi je preiskava pokazala, da je bil en kanadski proizvajalec, ki je zagotovil potrebne informacije, posredno povezan z nekaterimi proizvajalci v Skupnosti.
The information submitted by this company was verified at the premises of the company and it was found to be accurate and reliable and to thereby be a sound basis for establishing normal value.
Informacije, ki jih je predložila ta družba, so bile preverjene v prostorih družbe in ugotovljeno je bilo, da so točne in zanesljive ter kot take dobra podlaga za določitev normalne vrednosti.
It was concluded that the relationship of one company in the analogue country with some of the Community producers was not preclusive to selecting Canada as the analogue country.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da sodelovanje ene družbe v primerljivi državi z nekaterimi proizvajalci Skupnosti ne ovira izbora Kanade kot primerljive države.
Moreover, it was considered that the Belarusian and Russian producers being part of one industry during the USSR period did not make Russia a more suitable analogue country than Canada, as it was not substantiated how this fact would have contributed to Russia being a more suitable analogue country.
Poleg tega je bilo sprejeto stališče, da Rusija zaradi dejstva, da so bili beloruski in ruski proizvajalci v času ZSSR del ene industrije, ni primernejša primerljiva država kot Kanada.
With regard to the production volume in Canada, it has to be recalled that Canada is the biggest producer of potash world-wide, selling potash in substantial quantities both domestically and for export.
Glede na obseg proizvodnje v Kanadi je treba upoštevati, da je Kanada največja proizvajalka pepelike na svetu, ki velike količine pepelike proda na domačem in tujem trgu.
The individual Canadian producers, however, differ from each other in terms of production and sales quantities.
Posamezni kanadski proizvajalci se med seboj razlikujejo v smislu količine proizvodnje in prodaje.
This contributes to that the information available concerning the Canadian market is balanced and objective.
To pa prispeva k uravnoteženosti in objektivnosti informacij o kanadskem trgu.
It should also be recalled that the size of the market is not decisive for the selection of the analogue country and that based on economies of scale the bigger market could only contribute to the benefit of the Belarusian producer.
Treba je tudi upoštevati, da velikost trga ni odločilna pri izboru primerljive države in da večji trg, ki temelji na ekonomiji obsega, lahko pomeni zgolj prednost za beloruskega proizvajalca.
Therefore also this claim was rejected.
Ta trditev je bila zato ovržena.
Finally, as the claim concerning the level of development was not substantiated, it had also to be rejected.
Prav tako je bila ovržena trditev v zvezi s stopnjo razvoja, ker ni bila dokazana.
Therefore, the investigation confirmed that Canada should be used as an appropriate analogue country.
Preiskava je potrdila, da je treba uporabiti Kanado kot ustrezno primerljivo državo.
Consequently, calculations were based on the verified information from the two Canadian producers.
Posledično so izračuni temeljili na preverjenih informacijah dveh kanadskih proizvajalcev.
The domestic sales of the Canadian producer (who provided a complete questionnaire response) of the like product were found to be representative as they represented a major percentage in relation to the product concerned exported to the Community by the exporting producer in Belarus.
Domača prodaja podobnega izdelka kanadskega proizvajalca (ki je v celoti izpolnil vprašalnik) je bila reprezentativna, ker je predstavljala velik odstotek v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom, ki ga je v Skupnost izvozil proizvajalec iz Belorusije.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each product type, sold domestically in representative quantities, could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the product type in question.
Preučilo se je tudi, ali se domača prodaja posamezne vrste izdelka, ki se na domačem trgu prodaja v reprezentativnih količinah, lahko šteje za običajen potek trgovine, in sicer tako, da se je ugotovil delež dobičkonosne prodaje zadevne vrste izdelka neodvisnim strankam.
In cases where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Kjer je obseg prodaje posamezne vrste izdelka po neto ceni, enaki izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višji od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % skupnega obsega prodaje te vrste in kjer je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste enaka proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste med OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
This was found to be the case for one product type of Agrium which was sold on the Canadian market and exported to the Community by Belaruskali.
To je bilo ugotovljeno za eno vrsto izdelka družbe Agrium, ki se je prodajala na kanadskem trgu in jo je v Skupnost izvažala družba Belaruskali.
For three product types which were not sold on the domestic market in representative quantities, constructed normal value was used in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za tri vrste izdelkov, ki se niso prodajali na domačem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Normalna vrednost je bila konstruirana tako, da je bil proizvodnim stroškom izvozne vrste izdelka prištet razumni znesek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA-stroški) ter ustrezna stopnja dobička.
In this regard and in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for SG&A and profits were based on actual data pertaining to the production and sale, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product on the domestic market.
V zvezi s tem in v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe so PSA-stroški in dobiček temeljili na dejanskih podatkih o proizvodnji in prodaji v običajnem poteku trgovine podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu.
The information regarding the cost of production was based on the responses received from the two cooperating Canadian producers.
Informacije v zvezi s stroški proizvodnje so temeljile na odzivih dveh sodelujočih kanadskih proizvajalcev.
Given that the export sales of the cooperating exporter represented the totality of the imports into the Community of the product concerned originating in Belarus during the IP, the determination of the export price was based on the information provided by the cooperating exporting producer in Belarus.
Če je izvoz sodelujočega izvoznika med OP predstavljal celoten uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije v Skupnost, je določitev izvozne cene temeljila na informacijah sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika v Belorusiji.
It was found that potash sales of Belaruskali to the Community during the investigation period were made (1) directly to independent customers in the Community, (2) through related importers in the Community or (3) through a related trader located in Russia (IPC).
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je prodaja pepelike družbe Belaruskali v Skupnost med preiskavo potekala 1) neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, 2) prek povezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti ali 3) prek povezanega trgovca v Rusiji (IPC).
The related trader in Russia sold the product either to unrelated customers in the Community or to related importers in the Community.
Povezani trgovec v Rusiji je prodal izdelek nepovezanim strankam v Skupnosti ali povezanim uvoznikom v Skupnosti.
With regard to the sales made directly to independent customers in the Community, the prices actually paid or payable to Belaruskali or to IPC by these customers were taken as the basis for calculating the export price.
V zvezi z neposredno prodajo neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti so bile cene, dejansko plačane ali plačljive družbi Belaruskali ali IPC, upoštevane kot podlaga za izračun izvozne cene.
With regard to the sales to related importers in the Community by Belaruskali or IPC, the export price was constructed on the basis of the price at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer.
V zvezi s prodajo povezanim uvoznikom v Skupnosti s strani družbe Belaruskali ali IPC je bila izvozna cena konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri so bili uvoženi izdelki prvič nadalje prodani neodvisni stranki.
Adjustments were made for all costs incurred between importation and resale by those importers, including SG&A and duties and assuming a reasonable profit margin.
Prilagoditve so bile narejene za vse stroške, ki so jih ti uvozniki imeli med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s PSA-stroški in dajatvami ter ob domnevi ustrezne stopnje dobička.
A profit margin of 7,9 % was considered to be reasonable for this type of market and was also found in line with the profit of unrelated importers.
Stopnja dobička 7,9 % se je štela za ustrezno za to vrsto trga in je v skladu z dobičkom nepovezanih uvoznikov.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi zagotovili pravično primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, so bila odobrena nadomestila v obliki prilagoditve za razlike, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, adjustments were made where appropriate with regard to transport (including handling costs), ocean freight and insurance costs, packing and credit costs.
Na tej podlagi so bile po potrebi narejene prilagoditve v zvezi s stroški prevoza (vključno s stroški pretovarjanja), stroški čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovanja, stroški pakiranja in kredita.
The adjustments in the export price in respect of inland freight in the exporting country and credit costs were made based on the costs established in the analogue country.
Prilagoditve izvozne cene glede na notranji prevoz v izvozni državi in stroške kredita so bile narejene na podlagi stroškov, ugotovljenih v primerljivi državi.
For the export sales made via the related trader in Russia, an adjustment was also made to the export price, pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Za izvoz prek povezanega trgovca v Rusiji je bila narejena tudi prilagoditev za izvozno ceno v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The adjustment pursuant to this Article was made at the level of 3 % since this level was considered reasonable to reflect commissions paid to independent agents involved in the trade of the product concerned.
Prilagoditev v skladu s tem členom je bila narejena na ravni 3 %, saj naj bi ta raven ustrezno odražala provizije, plačane neodvisnim posrednikom, vpletenim v trgovino z zadevnim izdelkom.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price per product type.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno za posamezno vrsto izdelka.
A comparison of the normal value and the export price of Belaruskali showed a dumping margin of 27,5 % during the IP.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene družbe Belaruskali je med OP pokazala stopnjo dampinga v višini 27,5 %.
The comparison of the data concerning exports to the Community provided by Belaruskali and the total volume of imports as derived from the Eurostat import statistics indicated that the level of cooperation was high, since as mentioned above, Belaruskali's exports represented the totality of all Community imports from Belarus during the IP.
Primerjava podatkov o izvozu v Skupnost, ki jih je predložila družba Belaruskali, in skupnega obsega uvoza, ugotovljenega na podlagi statističnih podatkov Eurostata o uvozu, je pokazala, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka, ker je, kot je omenjeno zgoraj, izvoz družbe Belaruskali predstavljal celoto vsega uvoza Skupnosti iz Belorusije med OP.
It was first established for each of the two cooperating exporting producers whether its total domestic sales of the like product were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community, in accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za oba sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika je bilo najprej ugotovljeno, ali je bila celotna domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna, tj., ali je celotni obseg takšne prodaje predstavljal vsaj 5 % njunega celotnega obsega izvoza v Skupnost, v skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
This was found to be the case for both exporting producers.
To je bilo potrjeno za oba proizvajalca izvoznika.