natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
intends to explore the possibility of supporting the establishment of a generic second level domain name reserved for monitored sites committed to respecting minors and their rights, such as .KID.eu;
namerava raziskati možnost podpore vzpostavitvi splošnega imena domene na drugi ravni, rezerviranega za spremljane strani, ki so zavezane k spoštovanju mladoletnikov in njihovih pravic, kakor na primer .KID.eu;
continues to maintain a constructive and ongoing dialogue with content providers' organisations, consumer organisations and all parties concerned;
nadaljuje z ohranjanjem konstruktivnega in trajnega dialoga z organizacijami ponudnikov vsebin, organizacijami potrošnikov in vsemi udeleženimi stranmi;
intends to facilitate and support the formation of networks by self-regulatory bodies and the exchanging of experience among them, so as to assess the effectiveness of codes of conduct and approaches based on self-regulation in order to ensure the highest possible standards of protection for minors;
namerava olajšati in podpirati vzpostavljanje mrež samoregulativnih organov ter medsebojno izmenjavo izkušenj med njimi, da se lahko oceni učinkovitost kodeksa ravnanja in pristopov na podlagi samoreguliranja, z namenom zagotavljanja najvišjih možnih standardov varstva mladoletnikov;
intends to submit to the European Parliament and the Council, on the basis of information supplied by the Member States, a report on the implementation and effectiveness of the measures specified in this Recommendation, and to review this Recommendation if and when the need arises.
namerava na podlagi informacij iz držav članic Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo o izvajanju in učinkovitosti ukrepov, opredeljenih v tem priporočilu, in to priporočilo po potrebi pregledati.
Done at Brussels, on 20 December 2006
V Bruslju, 20. decembra 2006
OJ C 221, 8.9.2005, p. 87.
UL C 221, 8.9.2005, str. 87.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 7 September 2005 (OJ C 193 E, 17.8.2006, p. 217), Council Common Position of 21 September 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Position of the European Parliament of 12 December 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. septembra 2005 (UL C 193 E, 17.8.2006, str. 217), Skupno stališče Sveta z dne 21. septembra 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 270, 7.10.1998, p. 48.
UL L 270, 7.10.1998, str. 48.
Directive as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 202, 30.7.1997, str. 60).
Decision No 276/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 January 1999 adopting a multiannual Community action plan on promoting safer use of the Internet by combating illegal and harmful content on global networks (OJ L 33, 6.2.1999, p. 1).
Odločba št. 276/1999/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. januarja 1999 o sprejetju večletnega akcijskega načrta Skupnosti za pospeševanje varnejše uporabe interneta s preprečevanjem nezakonitih in škodljivih vsebin v globalnih omrežjih (UL L 33, 6.2.1999, str. 1).
Decision No 1151/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 amending Decision No 276/1999/EC adopting a multiannual Community action plan on promoting safer use of the Internet by combating illegal and harmful content on global networks (OJ L 162, 1.7.2003, p. 1).
Odločbe št. 1151/2003/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. junija 2003 o spremembi Odločbe št. 276/1999/ES o sprejetju večletnega delovnega načrta za pospeševanje varnejše uporabe internata s preprečevanjem nezakonitih in škodljivih vsebin v globalnih omrežjih (UL L 162, 1.7.2003, str. 1).
OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60.
UL L 202, 30.7.1997, str. 60.
OJ C 296, 10.11.1995, p. 15.
UL C 296, 10.11.1995, str. 15.
INDICATIVE GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION, AT NATIONAL LEVEL, OF MEASURES IN DOMESTIC LAW OR PRACTICE SO AS TO ENSURE THE RIGHT OF REPLY OR EQUIVALENT REMEDIES IN RELATION TO ON-LINE MEDIA
OKVIRNE SMERNICE ZA IZVAJANJE, NA NACIONALNI RAVNI, UKREPOV V NACIONALNEM PRAVU ALI PRAKSI, DA SE ZAGOTOVI PRAVICA DO ODGOVORA ALI ENAKOVREDNA PRAVNA SREDSTVA V ZVEZI S SPLETNIMI MEDIJI
Objective: introducing measures in the domestic law or practice of the Member States in order to ensure the right of reply or equivalent remedies in relation to on-line media, with due regard for their domestic and constitutional provisions and without prejudice to the possibility of adjusting its exercise to the particularities of each type of medium.
Cilj: uvesti ukrepe v nacionalno pravo ali prakso držav članic, da bi zagotovili pravico do odgovora ali enakovredna pravna sredstva v zvezi s spletnimi mediji, ob upoštevanju njihovih nacionalnih in ustavnih določb ter brez poseganja v možnost prilagoditve izvrševanja le-te glede na posebnosti katere koli vrste medija.
The term ‘medium’ refers to any means of communication for dissemination to the public of edited information on-line such as newspapers, periodicals, radio, television and Internet-based news services.
Izraz „medij“ se sklicuje na katero koli sredstvo komunikacije za razširjanje urejenih spletnih informacij javnosti, kot so časopisi, revije, radio, televizija in internetne informativne storitve.
Without prejudice to other provisions adopted by the Member States under civil, administrative or criminal law, any natural or legal person, regardless of nationality, whose legitimate interests, in particular, but not limited to, reputation and good name, have been affected by an assertion of facts in a publication or transmission should have the right of reply or equivalent remedies.
Brez poseganja v druge predpise, ki so jih sprejele države članice po civilnem, upravnem ali kazenskem pravu, bi morale imeti vse fizične in pravne osebe, ne glede na nacionalnost, katerih legitimni interesi, kot sta ugled in dobro ime, so bili prizadeti zaradi izjave o dejstvih pri objavi ali prenosu, pravico do odgovora ali do enakovrednih pravnih sredstev.
Member States should ensure that the actual exercise of the right of reply or equivalent remedies is not hindered by the imposition of unreasonable terms or conditions.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da dejansko izvajanje pravice do odgovora ali enakovrednih pravnih sredstev ni ovirano s prejetjem nerazumnih pogojev ali določb.
The right of reply or equivalent remedies should exist in relation to on-line media under the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Pravica do odgovora ali enakovredna pravna sredstva bi morala biti na voljo v zvezi s spletnimi mediji pod sodno pristojnostjo države članice.
Member States should adopt the measures needed to establish the right of reply or equivalent remedies and should determine the procedure to be followed for the exercise thereof.
Države članice bi morale sprejeti ukrepe, potrebne za vzpostavitev pravice do odgovora ali enakovrednih pravnih sredstev ter naj določijo postopek, s katerim se jih uresničuje.
In particular, they should ensure that a sufficient time span is allowed and that the procedures are such that the right of reply or equivalent remedies can be exercised appropriately by natural or legal persons resident or established in other Member States.
Zlasti bi morale zagotoviti, da je na voljo dovolj časa in da so postopki takšni, da lahko fizične ali pravne osebe, ki prebivajo ali so registrirane v drugi državi članici, uporabijo to pravico ali enakovredno pravno sredstvo.
The right of reply can be ensured not only through legislation, but also through co-regulatory or self-regulatory measures.
Pravica do odgovora se lahko, razen s pomočjo zakonodaje, zagotovi tudi s pomočjo koregulativnih in samoregulativnih ukrepov.
The right of reply is a particularly appropriate remedy in the on-line environment because it allows for an instant response to contested information and it is technically easy to attach the replies from the persons affected.
Pravica do odgovora je pravno sredstvo, ki je še posebej primerno za spletno okolje, saj se je mogoče takoj odzvati na sporne informacije in je odgovore oseb, ki jih te informacije zadevajo, mogoče zlahka priložiti.
However, the reply should be within a reasonable time after the request has been substantiated and at a time and in a manner appropriate to the publication or transmission to which the request refers.
Vendar bi moral odgovor slediti v razumnem roku po utemeljitvi zahteve ter bi moral biti časovno in po načinu primeren za javno objavo ali prenos, na katerega se zahteva nanaša.
Provision should be made for procedures whereby disputes as to the exercise of the right of reply or the equivalent remedies could be subject to review by the courts or similar independent bodies.
Sprejeti bi bilo treba ustrezne določbe za postopke, s katerimi spore, ki se nanašajo na uresničevanje pravice do odgovora ali enakovrednih pravnih sredstev, lahko ponovno pregledajo sodišča ali podobni neodvisni organi.
An application for exercise of right of reply or the equivalent remedies may be rejected if the claimant does not have a legitimate interest in the publication of such a reply, or if the reply would involve a punishable act, would render the content provider liable to civil law proceedings or would transgress standards of public decency.
Zahtevek za uresničevanje pravice do odgovora ali enakovrednih pravnih sredstev se sme zavrniti, če upravičenec nima legitimnega interesa do objave takšnega odgovora ali če bi odgovor vseboval kaznivo dejanje in bi s tem postal ponudnik vsebin odgovoren v skladu s postopki civilnega prava ali če bi z njim prekoračili pravila javne spodobnosti.
The right of reply is without prejudice to other remedies available to persons whose right to dignity, honour, reputation or privacy have been breached by the media.
Pravica do odgovora ne posega v uporabo drugih pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo osebam, katerih pravice do dostojanstva, časti, ugleda ali zasebnosti so bile kršene v medijih.
Examples of possible actions concerning media literacy:
Primeri možnih ukrepov glede medijskega opismenjevanja:
continuing education of teachers and trainers, in liaison with child protection associations, on using the Internet in the context of school education so as to maintain awareness of the possible risks of the Internet with particular regard to chatrooms and fora;
trajno izobraževanje učiteljev in mentorjev, v sodelovanju z društvi za zaščito otrok, o uporabi interneta v okviru šolskega izobraževanja, da se ohrani ozaveščenost v zvezi z možnimi nevarnostmi interneta, še zlasti klepetalnicami in forumi,
introduction of specific Internet training aimed at children from a very early age, including sessions open to parents;
uvedba posebnega poučevanja o internetu za otroke od malega naprej, vključno z odprtimi učnimi urami za starše,
an integrated educational approach forming part of school curricula and media literacy programmes, so as to provide information on using the Internet responsibly;
celostni izobraževalni pristop, vključen v šolske učne programe in programe medijskega opismenjevanja, da se zagotovijo informacije o odgovorni uporabi interneta,
organisation of national campaigns aimed at citizens, involving all communications media, to provide information on using the Internet responsibly;
organiziranje nacionalnih kampanj za državljane, ki vključujejo vsa komunikacijska sredstva, da se zagotovijo informacije o odgovorni uporabi interneta,
distribution of information packs on possible risks of the Internet (‘how to surf the Internet safely’, ‘how to filter unwanted messages’) and the setting up of hotlines to which reports or complaints concerning harmful or illegal content could be addressed;
razdeljevanje informacijskih zloženk o možnih nevarnostih interneta („kako varno deskati po internetu“, „kako izločati nezaželena sporočila“) in o vzpostavitvi telefonskih linij, na katere se je mogoče obrniti s poročili ali pritožbami, ki zadevajo škodljive ali nedovoljene vsebine,
adequate measures to establish or improve the performance of telephone hotlines, so as to make it easier to lodge complaints and to make it possible to report harmful or illegal content.
ustrezni ukrepi za vzpostavitev ali izboljšanje učinkovitosti telefonskih linij, da se olajša postopek vložitev pritožb in omogoči poročanje o škodljivih ali nedovoljenih vsebinah.
Examples of possible actions by the industries and the parties concerned for the benefit of minors:
Primeri možnih ukrepov industrije in udeleženih strani, ki so v korist mladoletnikov:
systematically providing users with an effective, updatable and easy-to-use filtering system when they subscribe to an access provider;
sistematično vzpostavljanje učinkovitega, posodobljenega in enostavnega sistema filtriranja ob vpisu novega naročnika pri ponudniku dostopa;
offering access to services specifically intended for children which are equipped with automatic filtering systems operated by access providers and mobile telephone operators;
ponujanje dostopa do storitev, ki so izrecno namenjene otrokom in ki so opremljene s sistemi avtomatskega filtriranja, s katerimi upravljajo dobavitelji dostopa in operaterji mobilne telefonije;
introducing incentives to provide a regularly updated description of the sites available, making it easier to classify sites and assess their content;
uvedba spodbujevalnih ukrepov za zagotavljanje tako redno posodabljenih opisov dostopnih spletnih strani za lažje razvrščanje spletnih strani, kakor tudi ocenjevanje njihove vsebine;
posting banners on search engines drawing attention to the availability both of information about responsible use of the Internet and of telephone hotlines.
uvedba pasic na spletnih iskalnikih, ki opozarjajo, da so na razpolago tako informacije o odgovorni uporabi interneta in vroče telefonske linije.
on transnational mobility within the Community for education and training purposes: European Quality Charter for Mobility
o transnacionalni mobilnosti v Skupnosti zaradi izobraževanja in usposabljanja: Evropska listina kakovosti za mobilnost
(Τext with EEA relevance)
(Besedilo velja za EGP)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 149(4) and Article 150(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 149(4) in 150(4) Pogodbe,
Mobility in education and training is an integral part of the freedom of movement of persons — a fundamental freedom protected by the Treaty — and one of the main objectives of the European Union's action in the field of education and training, based both on common values and on respect for diversity.
Mobilnost na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja je sestavni del prostega gibanja oseb – temeljna svoboščina, zaščitena s Pogodbo – in eden glavnih ciljev dejavnosti Evropske unije na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja, ki temelji tako na skupnih vrednotah kakor na spoštovanju raznolikosti.
It is an essential tool for creating a genuine European area of lifelong learning, for promoting employment and reducing poverty, and for helping to promote active European citizenship.
Je bistveno orodje pri nastajanju resničnega evropskega prostora vseživljenjskega učenja, za spodbujanje zaposlovanja in zmanjševanje revščine ter za pomoč pri spodbujanju dejavnega evropskega državljanstva.
Mobility brings citizens closer to one another and improves mutual understanding.
Mobilnost zbližuje državljane in izboljšuje medsebojno razumevanje.
It promotes solidarity, the exchange of ideas and a better knowledge of the different cultures which make up Europe; thus, mobility furthers economic, social and regional cohesion.
Spodbuja solidarnost, izmenjavo idej ter boljše poznavanje različnih kultur, ki tvorijo Evropo; s tem pa prispeva h gospodarski, socialni in regionalni koheziji.
Intensifying European mobility and exchanges for education and training purposes, and events such as the 2006 European Year of Workers' Mobility, have a key role to play in achieving the Lisbon goal of making Europe the most innovative and competitive knowledge-based economy by 2010.
Močnejša evropska mobilnost in izmenjave zaradi izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter dogodki, kot je Evropsko leto mobilnosti 2006, imajo ključno vlogo pri doseganju lizbonskega cilja, da postane Evropa do leta 2010 najbolj inovativno in konkurenčno gospodarstvo, temelječe na znanju.
Providing a better framework for mobility for education and training purposes within the EU will help to contribute towards the achievement of a knowledge-based economy central to the creation of employment, sustainable development, research and innovation in the Member States.
Ustvarjanje boljšega okvira za mobilnost zaradi izobraževanja in usposabljanja v EU bo prispevalo k doseganju na znanju temelječega gospodarstva, ki je bistveno za ustvarjanje delovnih mest, trajnostni razvoj ter raziskave in inovacije v državah članicah.
Increased support from all stakeholders, including public authorities, for mobility within the EU is needed to improve the quality and effectiveness of education and training systems in Europe.
Vse zainteresirane strani, vključno z državnimi organi, bi morali v večji meri podpirati mobilnost znotraj EU, da bi izboljšali kakovost in učinkovitost sistemov izobraževanja in usposabljanja v Evropi.
Recommendation 2001/613/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 July 2001 on mobility within the Community for students, persons undergoing training, volunteers, teachers and trainers was the first recommendation adopted with the aim of facilitating Community action to encourage mobility.
Priporočilo 2001/613/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 10. julija 2001 o mobilnosti znotraj Skupnosti za študente, osebe, ki se usposabljajo, prostovoljce, učitelje in vodje usposabljanja je bilo prvo priporočilo, sprejeto z namenom olajšati dejavnosti Skupnosti za spodbujanje mobilnosti.
The work of the group of experts set up by the Commission in accordance with point III(a) of that Recommendation, and the first follow-up report, while showing the progress made both at national and at European level as regards mobility for education and training purposes, demonstrate the need to focus not only on increasing mobility in quantitative terms but, above all, on improving its quality.
Delo skupine izvedencev, ki jo je ustanovila Komisija v skladu s točko III(a) tega priporočila, in njihovo prvo poročilo o nadaljnjem spremljanju sicer kažeta napredek, ki je bil dosežen na področju mobilnosti zaradi izobraževanja in usposabljanja na nacionalni in evropski ravni, vendar hkrati opozarjata, da se je treba osredotočiti ne le na količinsko povečanje mobilnosti, ampak predvsem na izboljšanje njene kakovosti.
This objective may be pursued, inter alia, by adopting, in the form of a Recommendation, a Quality Charter for Mobility, laying down a set of principles in this field, to be implemented on a voluntary basis.
Za ta cilj si je mogoče med drugim prizadevati tako, da se v obliki priporočila sprejme Listino kakovosti za mobilnost, ki določa sklop načel na tem področju in se izvaja prostovoljno.
The European Quality Charter for Mobility (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Charter’) should also allow for the specific needs of people with disabilities and for disadvantaged groups.
V Evropski listini kakovosti za mobilnost (v nadaljevanju „Listina“) bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi posebne potrebe invalidov in zapostavljenih skupin.
The Charter should help increase exchanges, facilitate the recognition of periods dedicated to education or training, and the recognition of titles and qualifications, and establish mutual trust so as to improve and strengthen cooperation between the relevant authorities, organisations and all the stakeholders in mobility.
Listina naj bi pomagala povečati število izmenjav, olajšati priznavanje obdobij, namenjenih izobraževanju ali usposabljanju ter priznavanje nazivov in kvalifikacij ter oblikovati medsebojno zaupanje, s katerim bi se izboljšalo in okrepilo sodelovanje med zadevnimi organi, organizacijami in vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, udeleženimi v mobilnosti.
Attention should be paid to the issue of the portability of loans, grants and social security benefits.
Pozorno bi bilo treba obravnavati vprašanje prenosljivosti posojil, štipendij in plačil prispevkov socialnega zavarovanja.
The Charter is intended to complement, but not replace, the specific provisions outlined in the Erasmus Student Charter.
Namen te listine ni nadomestiti, temveč dopolniti posebne določbe, predstavljene v Študentski listini Erasmus.
The Charter, in the respective languages of the recipients, should be made readily available by the authorities to all students and persons undergoing training, organisations and other stakeholders in mobility in countries of origin and host countries, and should be treated as a basic reference framework.
Organi iz držav porekla ali držav gostiteljic bi morali poskrbeti, da bi vsi slušatelji in udeleženci usposabljanja, organizacije ali druge za mobilnost zainteresirane strani imeli vedno na voljo Listino v svojem jeziku ter da bi ta služila kot temeljna referenca.
The advantages of mobility strongly depend on the quality of the practical provisions: information, preparation, support and recognition of the experience and qualifications acquired by participants during the study and training periods.
Koristi mobilnosti so v marsičem odvisne od kakovosti praktičnih dejavnikov: informacij, priprave, podpore in priznavanja izkušenj in kvalifikacij, ki so jih sodelujoči pridobili med študijem in v obdobjih usposabljanja.
The people and organisations involved can considerably improve its value by careful planning and suitable evaluation.
Ljudje in organizacije, udeleženi v mobilnosti, lahko s skrbnim načrtovanjem in ustreznim vrednotenjem zelo izboljšajo kakovost mobilnosti.
Europass is a particularly useful instrument for developing transparency and recognition in order to aid mobility.
Europass je nadvse uporaben instrument za razvijanje preglednosti in priznavanja, kar pripomore k mobilnosti.
It is desirable that the principles laid down in the Charter apply not only to the period of mobility itself but also to the periods preceding and following it.
Zaželeno je, da se načela, določena v tej listini, ne uporabljajo zgolj za dejansko obdobje mobilnosti, ampak tudi za obdobje pred in po njej.
A learning plan should be drawn up in advance.
Načrt učenja bi bilo treba pripraviti vnaprej.
General preparation of the participants is also necessary, taking account of linguistic preparation.
Prav tako je potrebna splošna priprava udeležencev, pri kateri se upošteva jezikovno pripravo.
In this regard, the competent authorities and organisations should provide assistance.
Pristojni organi in organizacije bi morali pri tem nuditi pomoč.
All administrative and financial questions, such as what financial support is available, who bears the costs, and insurance cover in the host country, should be solved before departure.
Pred odhodom bi bilo treba rešiti vsa administrativna in finančna vprašanja, na primer kakšna finančna podpora je na voljo in kdo krije stroške, ter zavarovanje v državi gostiteljici.
For the period spent abroad, the quality of mobility can be enhanced by the provision of schemes such as mentoring for participants.
Kar zadeva obdobje bivanja v tujini, se lahko kakovost mobilnosti poveča z zagotavljanjem programov, kot je mentorstvo za udeležence.
A detailed and clear description of any courses or training followed in the host country, including the duration of the course or training, should help to facilitate their recognition on returning to the home country.
Podroben in jasen opis vseh tečajev ali usposabljanja, ki jih je udeleženec opravil v državi gostiteljici, vključno s podatki o njihovem trajanju, bi pomagal olajšati njihovo priznavanje ob vrnitvi v matično državo.
Transparency and good administration call for a clear definition of the stakeholders responsible for each stage and action of the mobility programme.
Zaradi preglednosti in dobrega upravljanja je potrebna jasna opredelitev zainteresiranih strani, odgovornih za posamezno stopnjo in dejavnost programa mobilnosti.