natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As outlined under recital (4), the anti-dumping measures in force were extended to cover, in addition, imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi (4), so bili veljavni protidampinški ukrepi razširjeni, tako da zajemajo tudi uvoz folije iz PET, poslane iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Braziliji ali Izraelu ali ne.
The amended anti-dumping measures, as set out in recital (59), should continue to be extended to imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Kot je opredeljeno v uvodni izjavi (59), bi morali spremenjeni protidampinški ukrepi še naprej zajemati uvoz folije iz PET, poslane iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je njihovo poreklo deklarirano v Braziliji ali Izraelu ali ne.
The Brazilian and Israeli exporting producers who were exempted from the measures as extended by Regulation (EC) No 1975/2004 and amended by Regulation (EC) No 101/2006 should also be exempted from the measures as amended by this Regulation.
Brazilske in izraelske proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere ukrepi, razširjeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1975/2004, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 101/2006, ne veljajo, je treba izvzeti tudi iz ukrepov, spremenjenih s to uredbo.
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose an amendment to Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameravala biti predlagana sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, in jim je bila dana možnost, da podajo svoje pripombe.
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvedejo družbe, in torej posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom v operativnem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti in za njih velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates, for instance following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities, should be addressed to the Commission forthwith with all relevant information, in particular, any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic sales and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe, npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov, je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji, skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezani npr. s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duties.
Po potrebi bo Uredba (ES) št. 1676/2001 ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama družb, za katere veljajo individualne dajatve.
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporters, but also to those companies which did not have any exports during the IP.
Za zagotavljanje ustreznega uveljavljanja protidampinške dajatve bi morala stopnja preostale dajatve veljati ne le za nesodelujoče izvoznike, ampak tudi za družbe, ki niso izvažale v OP.
It should be noted that the Indian exporter MTZ changed its address with effect from July 2005, with no other changes to the company's ownership, structure or operations.
Treba je opomniti, da je indijski izvoznik MTZ spremenil svoj naslov, ki je veljaven od julija 2005, ne da bi to vplivalo na lastništvo družbe, njeno strukturo ali delovanje.
The address of the company should therefore be amended.
Naslov družbe se zato spremeni.
For the purpose of transparency and having regard to Regulation (EC) No 365/2006, adopted on the same day as this Regulation and also concerning a review of the definitive anti-dumping measures, a new consolidated version of Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 should be included in the operative part of this Regulation,
Za namene preglednosti in ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 365/2006, sprejete istočasno s to uredbo in ki ravno tako zadeva pregled dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, je treba novo prečiščeno različico člena 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001 vključiti v operativni del te uredbe –
Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen z Uredbo (ES) št. 365/2006, se nadomesti z naslednjim:
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 (TARIC codes 3920621903, 3920621906, 3920621909, 3920621913, 3920621916, 3920621919, 3920621923, 3920621926, 3920621929, 3920621933, 3920621936, 3920621939, 3920621943, 3920621946, 3920621949, 3920621953, 3920621956, 3920621959, 3920621963, 3920621969, 3920621976 and 3920621994) and ex39206290 (TARIC codes 3920629033 and 3920629094) and originating in India and the Republic of Korea.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (‚PET’), ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 (oznake TARIC: 3920621903, 3920621906, 3920621909, 3920621913, 3920621916, 3920621919, 3920621923, 3920621926, 3920621929, 3920621933, 3920621936, 3920621939, 3920621943, 3920621946, 3920621949, 3920621953, 3920621956, 3920621959, 3920621963, 3920621969, 3920621976 in 3920621994) in ex39206290 (oznaki TARIC 3920629033 in 3920629094), s poreklom iz Indije in Republike Koreje.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be as follows for products originating in:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve na neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred carinjenjem, je naslednja za izdelke s poreklom iz:
Definitive Duty (%)
Dokončna dajatev (%)
Where any party provides sufficient evidence to the Commission:
Če katera koli stranka Komisiji zagotovi zadostne dokaze,
that it did not export the goods described in Article 1(1) during the original investigation period,
da ni izvažala blaga, opisanega v členu 1(1), med prvotnim obdobjem preiskave,
that it is not related to any exporter or producer subject to the measures imposed by this Regulation,
da ni povezana z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, uvedeni s to uredbo,
that it has exported the goods concerned after the investigation period, or that it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community,
da je izvažala zadevno blago po obdobju preiskave ali da je prevzela nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozi znatno količino v Skupnost,
the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend Article 1(2) by adding that party to the list of companies subject to anti-dumping measures as appears in the table in Article 1(2).
lahko Svet z navadno večino in na predlog Komisije ter po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom spremeni člen 1(2) tako, da doda to stranko na seznam družb, ki so predmet protidampinških ukrepov, navedenih v tabeli v členu 1(2).
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.’
Če ni drugače določeno, se uporabljajo veljavne carinske določbe.“ .
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1975/2004 (OJ L 342, 18.11.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1975/2004 (UL L 342, 18.11.2004, str. 1).
OJ C 40, 17.2.2005, p. 8.
UL C 40, 17.2.2005, str. 8.
OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 1.
UL L 17, 21.1.2006, str. 1.
For the purpose of calculating the final anti-dumping duty for ‘all other companies’, the export subsidy margin of the company on the basis of which the dumping margin for ‘all other companies’ is based was taken into consideration.
Za izračun končne protidampinške dajatve za „vse druge družbe“ se je upoštevala stopnja izvozne subvencije družbe, na kateri temelji stopnja dampinga za „vse druge družbe“.
Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006
imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2026/97
o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) št. 2026/97
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not member of the European Community [1] (hereinafter referred to as the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljevanju „osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 18 Uredbe,
EXISTING MEASURES AND TERMINATED INVESTIGATIONS CONCERNING THE SAME PRODUCT
OBSTOJEČI UKREPI IN KONČANE PREISKAVE, KI ZADEVAJO ISTI IZDELEK
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2], imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 and originating in India (hereinafter referred to as the definitive countervailing measures).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“), uvrščene pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 in s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljevanju „dokončni izravnalni ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 19,1 % imposed on imports from all other companies.
Ti ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem v razponu med 3,8 % in 19,1 % uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, s preostalo stopnjo dajatve 19,1 %, uvedeno na uvoz od vseh drugih družb.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [3], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of PET film originating in India and the Republic of Korea.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [3] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije in Republike Koreje.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 0 % and 62,6 % on imports of PET film originating in India (hereinafter referred to as the definitive anti-dumping measures), with the exception of imports from five Indian companies (Ester Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as Ester), Flex Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as Flex), Garware Polyester Limited (hereinafter referred to as Garware), MTZ Polyesters Limited (hereinafter referred to as MTZ), and Polyplex Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as Polyplex)) from whom undertakings had been accepted by Commission Decision 2001/645/EC [4].
Ti ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem v razponu med 0 % in 62,6 % uvedeni na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije (v nadaljevanju „dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“), razen na uvoz petih indijskih družb (Ester Industries Limited (v nadaljevanju „Ester“), Flex Industries Limited (v nadaljevanju „Flex“), Garware Polyester Limited (v nadaljevanju „Garware“), MTZ Polyesters Limited (v nadaljevanju „MTZ“) in Polyplex Corporation Limited (v nadaljevanju „Polyplex“)), katerih zaveze so bile sprejete s Sklepom Komisije 2001/645/ES [4].
It is noted that the company formerly known as MTZ Polyesters Limited changed name.
Treba je opomniti, da je družba, prej poznana kot MTZ Polyesters Limited, spremenila svoje ime.
Its new name is MTZ Polyfilms Limited.
Njeno novo ime je MTZ Polyfilms Limited.
This change of name in no way affected the findings of Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 and the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to it under its previous name.
Ta sprememba imena nikakor ni vplivala na ugotovitve Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/1999 in upravičenost družbe do individualne stopnje dajatve, ki se je za to družbo uporabljala pod njenim prejšnjim imenom.
The Commission announced on 17 February 2005 the change of name of MTZ by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5].
Komisija je 17. februarja 2005 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], objavila spremembo imena družbe MTZ.
It is further noted that MTZ changed its address with effect from July 2005, with no other changes to either the company's ownership, structure or operations.
Treba je tudi opomniti, da je družba MTZ spremenila svoj naslov, ki je veljaven od julija 2005, ne da bi to vplivalo na lastništvo družbe, njeno strukturo ali delovanje.
The Council, by Regulations (EC) No 1975/2004 [6] and (EC) No 1976/2004 [7], extended the definitive countervailing and anti-dumping measures on imports of PET film originating in India, to imports of the same product consigned from Brazil and Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1975/2004 [6] in (ES) št. 1976/2004 [7] sta razširili dokončne izravnalne in protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije na uvoz enakega izdelka, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in iz Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne.
On 28 June 2002 [8], the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to the form of the definitive countervailing measures and, in particular to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by one Indian exporting producer, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 28. junija 2002 [8] začela delni vmesni pregled, omejen le na dokončne izravnalne ukrepe in zlasti na preiskavo sprejemljivosti zavez, ki jih je ponudil indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
This investigation has been terminated by Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 [9].
Ta preiskava je bila končana z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 365/2006 [9].
On 22 November 2003 [10], the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to the form of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 22. novembra 2003 [10] začela delni vmesni pregled, omejen le na dokončne protidampinške ukrepe.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 365/2006.
On 4 January 2005 [11], the Commission initiated a partial interim review limited to the level of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 4. januarja 2005 [11] začela delni vmesni pregled, omejen le na stopnjo dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006, which amended the level of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Ta preiskava je bila končana z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 365/2006, ki je spremenila stopnjo dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
On 23 August 2005 [12], the Commission initiated a review of Regulations (EC) No 1975/2004 and (EC) No 1976/2004 with respect to the application of an Israeli producer for an exemption from the extended measures.
Komisija je 23. avgusta 2005 [12] začela pregled uredb (ES) št. 1975/2004 in (ES) št. 1976/2004 samo v zvezi z vlogo izraelskega proizvajalca za izvzetje iz podaljšanih ukrepov.
This investigation has been terminated by Council Regulation (EC) No 101/2006.
Ta preiskava je bila končana z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 101/2006.
REQUEST FOR AN EXPIRY REVIEW
ZAHTEVEK ZA PREGLED ZARADI IZTEKA UKREPA
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry [13] of the definitive countervailing measures in force, the Commission received a request for the initiation of an expiry review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation, from Community producers of the like product, i.e. DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH, Nuroll SpA and Toray Plastics Europe (hereinafter referred to as the applicants).
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku [13] veljavnih dokončnih izravnalnih ukrepov je Komisija prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2597/1999 v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe od proizvajalcev Skupnosti podobnega izdelka, tj. DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH, Nuroll SpA in Toray Plastics Europe (v nadaljevanju „vložniki“).
The applicants represent a major proportion, in this case over 50 %, of the total Community production of PET film.
Vložniki predstavljajo znaten delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 %, celotne proizvodnje folije iz PET Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in the continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek je bil utemeljen s tem, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti teh ukrepov subvencioniranje in škoda za industrijo Skupnosti verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovno pojavila.
Prior to the initiation of the expiry review, and in accordance with Articles 10(9) and 22(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission notified the Government of India (hereinafter referred to as the GOI) that it had received a properly documented review request and invited the GOI for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as regards the contents of the complaint and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
Komisija je pred začetkom pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in v skladu s členoma 10(9) in 22(1) osnovne uredbe uradno obvestila vlado Indije („VI“), da je prejela ustrezno dokumentiran zahtevek za pregled, ter jo povabila k posvetovanjem, da bi se pojasnil položaj glede vsebine pritožbe in da bi se dosegla vzajemno dogovorjena rešitev.
However, the Commission did not receive any answer from the GOI regarding its offer for consultation.
Vendar pa Komisija ni prejela odgovora VI glede svoje ponudbe za posvetovanje.
INITIATION OF AN EXPIRY REVIEW
ZAČETEK PREGLEDA ZARADI IZTEKA UKREPA
The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the applicants and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with the provisions of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je preučila dokaze, ki so jih predložili vložniki, in ugotovila, da zadoščajo za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu z določbami člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Commission initiated an expiry review of Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 by means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [14].
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija začela pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2597/1999 z objavo obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [14].
The investigation covered the period from 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004 (hereinafter referred to as the review investigation period or IP).
Preiskava je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2003 do 30. septembra 2004 (v nadaljevanju „obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends in the context of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 up to the end of the review investigation period (hereinafter referred to as the period considered).
Preiskava gibanj v smislu škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom (v nadaljevanju „obravnavano obdobje“).
PARTIES CONCERNED BY THE INVESTIGATION
STRANKE, KI JIH ZADEVA PREISKAVA
The Commission officially advised the applicants, other known Community producers, exporting producers, importers, upstream suppliers, users and the GOI of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je uradno obvestila vložnike, druge znane proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, začetne dobavitelje, uporabnike in VI o začetku preiskave.
Interested parties had the opportunity to make their views known in writing.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost, da svoja stališča predložijo v pisni obliki.
The written and oral comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih dale stranke, so bile obravnavane in glede na ustreznost tudi upoštevane.
In view of the apparently large number of exporting producers of PET film in India which were named in the request, the use of sampling techniques for the investigation of subsidisation was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov folije iz PET v Indiji, ki so bili navedeni v zahtevku, so bili v obvestilu o začetku preiskave subvencioniranja v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe predvideni postopki vzorčenja.
In order to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers were asked to make themselves known and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the IP.
Da bi se odločilo, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi se izbralo vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki pozvani, da se javijo in zagotovijo, kot je bilo določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne podatke o svojih dejavnostih, ki se nanašajo na zadevni izdelek v OP.
After examination of the information submitted, and given the high number of exporting producers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was necessary.
Po preiskavi predloženih podatkov in glede na visoko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje, je bilo odločeno, da je vzorčenje potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned or who made themselves known within the deadlines set in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ali ki so se javile v roku obvestila o začetku postopka, poslala vprašalnik.
Replies were received from four Community producers, eight exporting producers, one importer/user, one up-stream supplier and the GOI.
Odgovore je prejela od štirih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, osmih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, enega uvoznika/uporabnika, enega začetnega dobavitelja in od VI.
From the eight Indian exporting producers, four companies (Ester, Flex, Garware and Jindal Poly Films Limited (hereinafter referred to as Jindal)), were selected for the sample.
Izmed osmih indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov so bile štiri družbe (Ester, Flex, Garware in Jindal Poly Films Limited (v nadaljevanju „Jindal“)) izbrane za vzorčenje.