natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This shows that the higher investment at Cutro for the paintshop cannot be attributed to the lack of an established supplier network, but is rather the consequence of different technological choices in the alternative locations.
To kaže, da večje naložbe v lakirnico v Cutru ni mogoče pripisati pomanjkanju vzpostavljene dobaviteljske mreže, temveč je to posledica drugačnih tehnoloških odločitev na alternativnih lokacijah.
A similar reasoning applies to the test track at Cutro.
Podobni razlogi veljajo za testno stezo v Cutru.
While it is true that in the alternative of Modena De Tomaso could rent existing facilities for testing the sports cars, no such facilities would be available for the Simbir model in Timisoara.
Res je, da bi lahko na alternativni lokaciji v Modeni skupina De Tomaso obstoječe možnosti oddajala v najem za testiranje športnih avtomobilov, medtem ko takšnih možnosti za model Simbir v Timisoari ni.
Indeed, Italy affirms that the Simbir model would be tested on normal roads around the Romanian plant.
Italija je zatrdila, da bi model Simbir testirali na normalnih cestah v okolici romunskega obrata.
Yet a specific investment is foreseen at Cutro for dedicated tracks to test the Simbir model.
V Cutru je predvidena posebna naložba v testno stezo za testiranje modela Simbir.
The Commission notes furthermore that other factors that could justify a higher degree of automation between different locations do not apply in the present case.
Komisija nadalje ugotavlja, da v tem primeru ne veljajo drugi dejavniki, ki bi lahko upravičili višjo stopnjo avtomatizacije na različnih lokacijah.
Investment in automation is often justified by high volume production, but this is not the case for De Tomaso, which would be a small volume producer both at Cutro and in the alternative location.
Naložbe v avtomatizacijo so pogosto upravičene s proizvodnjovelikega obsega, vendar to ne velja za skupino De Tomaso, saj je to proizvajalec majhnega obsega tako v Cutru, kot tudi na alternativnih lokacijah.
Similarly, quality levels would be identical in the alternative locations.
Podobno bi bile ravni kakovosti na alternativnih lokacijah identične.
The above elements have led the Commission to conclude that the very high differences in investment costs between Cutro and the alternative locations can only be explained by the fact that the projects compared are very different in nature.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenih elementov je Komisija sklenila, da je mogoče zelo velike razlike v naložbenih stroških med Cutrom in alternativnima lokacijama razložiti le z dejstvom, da se primerjana projekta zelo razlikujeta po naravi.
This conclusion is supported by the detailed description of the investments that Italy has provided for some operations.
Ta sklep podpira podroben opis naložb, ki ga je Italija predložila za nekatere dejavnosti.
The latest information shows that the project at Cutro consists in an up-to-date fully automated production system designed for high volume production, while the alternative project is based on a low automation and low volume production concept.
Najnovejše informacije kažejo, da sestavlja projekt v Cutru najnovejši, povsem avtomatiziran proizvodni sistem, namenjen proizvodnji velikega obsega, medtem ko temelji alternativni projekt na nizki avtomatizaciji in konceptu proizvodnje majhnega obsega.
The following examples are indicative of the different nature of the projects compared:
Primeri v nadaljevanju kažejo na različno naravo primerjanih projektov:
for the assembly of the Simbir model at Cutro an investment of over EUR 2 million is foreseen for a very sophisticated and fully robotised station for the installation of windscreens.
za sestavo modela Simbir v Cutru je predvidena naložba več kot 2 milijona EUR za zelo visoko razvito in popolnoma robotizirano postajo za vgradnjo vetrobranskih stekel.
This machinery is usually preferred over manual installation processes only for very high volume productions, largely in excess of the 50000 units envisaged in this project.
Običajno se daje tem strojem prednost pred ročnimi postopkom vgradnje samo za proizvodnje velikega obsega, ki zelo presegajo 50000 enot, predvidenih v tem projektu.
No such investments are foreseen at Timisoara;
V Timisoari takšne naložbe niso predvidene:
similarly, assembly of the Simbir model at Cutro would employ robots for installing dashboards, front end assemblies, roof panels and for seat and door handling.
podobno bi pri sestavi modela Simbir v Cutru uporabili robote za vgradnjo armaturnih plošč, sestavljanje prednjih delov, streh ter za ravnanje s sedeži in vrati.
No such machinery is foreseen at Timisoara;
V Timisoari takšni stroji niso predvideni;
for the pressing and welding of the sports cars, a high cost laser cut station is planned for Cutro, with no similar investment foreseen at Modena;
za stiskanje in varjenje športnih avtomobilov je za Cutro načrtovana draga postaja za lasersko rezanje, medtem ko v Modeni podobna naložba ni predvidena;
investments at Cutro include an expensive, completely equipped metrological unit with a coordinate based measuring system for both a complete body and sub-components.
naložbe v Cutru vključujejo drago, v celoti opremljeno meroslovno enoto z merilnim sistemom na osnovi koordinat za celotno karoserijo in pod-sestavinami.
No similar investment is foreseen in the alternative;
V alternativi podobna naložba ni predvidena;
The alternative solution does not include this capability;
Alternativna rešitev te zmožnosti nima;
the Cutro investment plans include a centralised IT monitoring and diagnostic system for the assembly lines.
naložbeni načrti Cutra vključujejo centralizirano spremljanje informacijske tehnologije in diagnostični sistem za tekoče trakove.
No such system is foreseen for the alternative solution, although the final products are expected to reach the same quality levels;
Za alternativno rešitev takšen sistem ni predviden, čeprav se pričakuje, da bodo končni proizvodi dosegli enako raven kakovosti;
the Cutro solution includes investments for the creation of a permanent training centre with multimedia facilities, open also to suppliers’ personnel.
rešitev Cutro vključuje naložbe za vzpostavitev trajnega centra za usposabljanje z multimedijskimi sredstvi, ki bo dostopen tudi osebju dobaviteljev.
There is no such centre in the alternative solution;
V alternativni rešitvi takega centra ni;
the investment at Cutro includes an engine test bench.
naložba v Cutru vključuje preskusno napravo za motorje.
The facility would allow De Tomaso to carry out both standard production tests and fine tuning, and research and development on the engines (petrol engines for the sports cars and diesel engines for the Simbir) bought from external suppliers and assembled in the cars at Cutro.
Naprava bi skupini De Tomaso omogočila izvajanje standardnih proizvodnih testov in natančnih nastavitev ter raziskave in razvoj motorjev (bencinski motorji za športne avtomobile in dizelski motorji za Simbir), kupljenih od zunanjih dobaviteljev in montiranih v avtomobile v Cutru.
Taking all these factors into account, the Commission concludes that the investment costs for machinery and equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling at Cutro are excessive and not comparable with the investment costs in the alternative solution.
Ob upoštevanju vseh teh dejavnikov Komisija ugotavlja, da so naložbeni stroški za stroje in opremo, orodja in barvila ter orodja dobaviteljev v Cutru previsoki in niso primerljivi z naložbenimi stroški v alternativni rešitvi.
On the basis of the available information, the Commission, with the aid of its external automotive expert, has estimated that the objective differences between the alternative locations in terms of the existence of a supplier network, labour costs, legislative requirements and workforce skills could justify a handicap of 25% at Cutro with respect to the alternative solution.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je Komisija s pomočjo svojih zunanjih avtomobilskih strokovnjakov ocenila, da lahko objektivne razlike med alternativnima lokacijama glede obstoja dobaviteljske mreže, stroškov delovne sile, zakonskih zahtev in usposobljenosti delovne sile upravičijo 25 % prikrajšanost v Cutru glede alternativne rešitve.
The Commission therefore concludes that the investment costs for machinery and equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling that can be considered eligible for aid at Cutro amount to EUR 94530690 [11], as against EUR 165381681 according to Italy.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da naložbeni stroški za stroje in opremo, orodja in barvila ter orodja dobaviteljev, ki upravičeni do pomoči, v Cutru znašajo 94530690 EUR [11], v primerjavi z 165381681 EUR po podatkih Italije.
Regarding the estimate of the eligible costs carried out above, the Commission remarks firstly that its objective is not to decide which investment should or should not be carried out at Cutro, but to determine which of the investments that De Tomaso plans to carry out are comparable, within the meaning of the motor vehicle framework, with the investments that would be carried out in the alternative locations and are therefore eligible for aid.
V zvezi z zgoraj izvedeno oceno upravičenih stroškov Komisija najprej poda pripombo, da ni njen namen odločiti, katera naložba se mora ali ne sme izvesti v Cutru, temveč ugotoviti katere naložbe, ki jih namerava skupina De Tomaso izvesti, so primerljive, v smislu okvira za motorna vozila, z naložbami, ki bi bile izvedene na alternativnih lokacijah in so zato upravičene do pomoči.
Secondly, the Commission remarks that it has not had the possibility to carry out a more detailed comparison of the alternative projects, owing to Italy’s claim that such more detailed comparison was not feasible.
Drugič, Komisija poda pripombo, da ni imela možnosti izvesti podrobnejše primerjave alternativnih projektov zaradi trditve Italije, da takšna primerjava ni izvedljiva.
The Commission therefore had to rely on the information that was made available to it.
Zato se je morala Komisija zanesti na informacije, ki so ji bile na voljo.
The Commission therefore concludes that total eligible costs for the project amount to EUR 136061346 [12] in present values.
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da znašajo skupni upravičeni stroški za projekt 136061346 EUR [12] v trenutni vrednosti.
Therefore, only these investments have been taken into account for the calculation of the regional handicap at Cutro.
Zato so se pri izračunu regionalne prikrajšanosti v Cutru upoštevale le te naložbe.
This modification has led to a reduction in the handicap for investment costs and other eligible expenses from EUR 89757129 to EUR 18906138 [13].
Zaradi te spremembe se je zmanjšala prikrajšanost za naložbene stroške in druge upravičene stroške z 89757129 EUR na 18906138 EUR [13].
The Commission has also assessed the comparison of operating costs in the CBA submitted by Italy with its comments in response to the decision opening proceedings.
Komisija je tudi ocenila primerjavo poslovnih stroškov v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA), ki jo je predložila Italija s svojimi pripombami kot odgovor na sklep o sprožitvi postopka.
Regarding the workforce needs, the Commission accepts the corrections made by Italy for the number of managers and white collar workers in the alternative solution.
V zvezi s potrebami delovne sile Komisija sprejema popravke s strani Italije za število upravljavcev in uslužbencev v alternativni rešitvi.
However, the Commission notes that the increased workforce has not been correctly included in the CBA for the calculation of labour costs.
Komisija vseeno ugotavlja, da za izračun stroškov dela povečana delovna sila ni bila pravilno vključena v analizo stroškov in koristi (CBA).
The number of workers in the alternative solution reported in the CBA is 642 in 2009, while the supporting documentation gives the number as 685.
Število delavcev, ki je v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA) navedeno za alternativno rešitev, znaša 642 v letu 2009, medtem ko spremljajoča dokumentacija navaja število 685.
The Commission considers that the latter figure is the correct one and has amended the CBA accordingly.
Komisija meni, da je slednje število pravilno in je ustrezno spremenila analizo stroškov in koristi (CBA).
Total labour costs in the alternative solution consequently increase from EUR 23448521 to EUR 28526739, and the handicap for this item is reduced by EUR 5078218 (EUR 62658707 instead of EUR 67736925).
Posledično se skupni delovni stroški v alternativni rešitvi povečajo z 23448521 EUR na 28526739 EUR, prikrajšanost za ta predmet se zmanjša za 5078218 EUR (62658707 EUR namesto 67736925 EUR).
Regarding outward transport costs, the Commission accepts the correction made by Italy, which reduces the overall outward transport costs handicap to EUR 745269 (the Italian authorities had originally calculated EUR 754916).
Komisija v zvezi s stroški zunanjega prevoza sprejema popravek Italije, s katerim se zmanjša prikrajšanost skupnih stroškov zunanjega prevoza na 745269 EUR (italijanske oblasti so prvotno izračunale 754916 EUR).
The modifications introduced in the analysis produce cost-benefit results that differ from those notified by Italy.
Spremembe, uvedene v analizi, prinašajo rezultate stroškov in koristi, ki se razlikujejo od tistih, ki jih je prijavila Italija.
The modified CBA indicates a net cost handicap for Cutro of EUR 82310114 [14] in 2003 values (compared to EUR 158248977 as notified).
Spremenjena analiza stroškov in koristi (CBA) nakazuje na prikrajšanost v neto stroških v Cutru v višini 82310114 EUR [14] v vrednostih iz leta 2003 (v primerjavi s priglašenimi 15248977 EUR).
The resulting handicap ratio of the project is 60,49% [15] (instead of 76,48% as initially notified).
Iz tega izhajajoče razmerje prikrajšanosti projekta je 60,49 % [15] (namesto 76,48 %, kot prvotno priglašeno).
Finally, in accordance with point 3.2.(d) of the motor vehicle framework, the Commission considered the question of a ‘top-up’, which is an increase in the allowable aid intensity intended as a further incentive to the investor to invest in the region in question.
Končno, v skladu s točko 3.2.(d) okvira za motorna vozila, je Komisija obravnavala vprašanje „doplačila“, ki pomeni povečanje dovoljene intenzivnosti pomoči, predvidene za nadaljnjo spodbudo vlagateljev, da vlagajo v zadevno regijo.
It is clear that De Tomaso will increase dramatically its capacity as consequence of the investment, as its production levels are currently extremely low.
Seveda bo skupina De Tomaso zaradi naložbe zelo povečala svojo zmogljivost, saj so njene proizvodne stopnje trenutno zelo nizke.
According to the motor vehicle framework, the ‘regional handicap ratio’ resulting from the CBA is therefore reduced by one percentage point (‘high’ impact on competition for an investment project in an Article 87(3)(a) region), resulting in a final ratio of 59,49% gge, which is lower than the regional ceiling of 50% nge for large enterprises in Calabria (which, for the project under scrutiny, corresponds to 73,83% gge) and, a fortiori, for SMEs.
Zato se skladno z okvirom za motorna vozila „regionalno razmerje prikrajšanosti“, ki je rezultat analize stroškov in koristi (CBA) zniža za eno odstotno točko („velik“ vpliv na konkurenco za naložbeni projekt v regiji iz člena 87(3)(a)), zaradi česar je končno razmerje 59,49 % bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge), kar je nižje od regionalne zgornje meje 50 % neto ekvivalenta dotacije (nge) za velika podjetja v Kalabriji (ki za projekt pod nadzorom ustreza 73,83 % gge) in še zlasti za MSP.
Given that the ‘regional handicap ratio’ remains in any event below the regional ceiling of 73,83% gge for the project, there is no longer any need to determine whether De Tomaso is an SME.
Glede na dejstvo, da ostaja „razmerje regionalne prikrajšanosti“ v vsakem primeru pod regionalno zgornjo mejo 73,83 % bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge) za projekt, ni več treba ugotoviti, ali je skupina De Tomaso MSP.
The Commission finds that the regional aid that Italy plans to grant to De Tomaso for the project in question is compatible with the common market insofar as it does not exceed an aid intensity of 59,49% gge of the eligible costs.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je regionalna pomoč, ki jo namerava Italija dodeliti skupini De Tomaso za zadevni projekt, združljiva s skupnim trgom, v kolikor ne presega intenzivnosti pomoči 59,49 % bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge) upravičenih stroškov.
The Commission finds that the eligible costs for the project in question amount to EUR 136061346 in 2003 values (discount rate 5,06%).
Komisija meni, da znašajo upravičeni stroški za zadevni projekt 136061346 EUR v vrednostih iz leta 2003 (diskontna stopnja 5,06 %).
Therefore, the Commission finds that the regional aid that Italy plans to grant to De Tomaso for the project in question is compatible with the common market insofar as it does not exceed EUR 80949501 gge (in 2003 values, discount rate 5,06%).
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je regionalna pomoč, ki jo namerava Italija dodeliti skupini De Tomaso za zadevni projekt, združljiva s skupnim trgom, v kolikor ne presega 80949501 EUR bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge) (v vrednostih iz leta 2003, diskontna stopnja 5,06 %).
Any additional state aid for the investment projects in question is incompatible with the common market,
Vsaka dodatna državna pomoč za zadevne naložbene projekte je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom–
The state aid which Italy is planning to implement for the companies Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty, up to a maximum amount of EUR 80949501 gross grant equivalent in 2003 values (discount rate 5,06%).
Državna pomoč, ki jo namerava Italija izvajati za družbi Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl, je združljiva s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, do največjega zneska 80949501 EUR bruto ekvivalenta dotacije v vrednostih iz leta 2003 (diskontna stopnja 5,06 %).
Any state aid in addition to the aid amount referred to in Article 1 that Italy plans to grant to the companies Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl for the project under scrutiny shall be incompatible with the common market.
Vsaka dodatna državna pomoč, poleg zneska navedenega v členu 1, ki jo namerava Italija dodeliti družbama Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl za projekt pod nadzorom, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
OJ C 227, 23.9.2003, p. 2.
UL C 227, 23.9.2003, str. 2.
Factual error: should read ‘net grant equivalent’.
Dejanska napaka: se glasi „ neto ekvivalenta dotacije “.
The rate of 5,06% is taken from the table ‘State Aid - Reference and discount rates (in %) since 01.08.1997’ (see http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html) and corresponds to the rate for 2002, which was the year of notification.
Stopnja 5,06 % je vzeta iz preglednice „Državna pomoč – Referenčne mere in diskontne stopnje (v %), ki veljajo od 1. 8. 1997“ (glej http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html) in ustrezajo stopnji za leto 2002, ki je bilo leto priglasitve.
Commission Decision of 12 July 2000 not to raise objections in case N 715/99, published in OJ C 278, 30.9.2000, p. 26.
Sklep Komisije z dne 12. julija 2000 o nenasprotovanju v zadevi N 715/99, objavljena v UL C 278, 30.9.2000, str. 26.
According to Article 4(3) of the SME Regulation, when SMEs undertake investment projects in areas which qualify for regional aid under Article 87(3)(a) of the Treaty, the maximum aid intensity for regional investment aid determined in the map approved by the Commission can be increased by up to 15 percentage points gge, provided that the total net aid intensity for the project does not exceed 75%.
Skladno s členom 4(3) Uredbe MSP, če se MSP lotijo naložbenih projektov na območjih, upravičenih za regionalno pomoč po členu 87(3)(a) Pogodbe, se lahko najvišja intenzivnost pomoči za regionalno pomoč v naložbah, določena v karti, ki jo je odobrila Komisija, poveča za največ 15 odstotnih točk bruto ekvivalenta dotacije (gge), pod pogojem, da skupna neto intenzivnost pomoči za projekt ne presega 75 %.
OJ C 279, 15.9.1997, p. 1 and OJ C 368, 22.12.2001, p. 10.
UL C 279, 15.9.1997, str. 1 in UL C 368, 22.12.2001, str. 10.
Factual error: should read ‘five years’.
Dejanska napaka: se glasi „pet let“.
Regional handicap ratio = InvestmentNet cost handicap (both in present values).In the present case, the investment amounts to EUR 206912337 [see point 10 above].Regional handicap ratio = 158248977206912337 = 76,48%.
Razmerje regionalne prikrajšanosti = Naložbaoba v sedanji vrednosti Prikrajšanost v neto stroških.V tem primeru znaša naložba 206912337 EUR [glej točko 10 zgoraj].Razmerje regionalne prikrajšanosti = 158248977206912337 = 76,48 %.
(Investment in machinery and equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling in the alternative) x (1+handicap rate at Cutro) = 75624552 [see point 46 above] x 1.25 = 94530690.
(Naložbe v stroje in opremo, orodja in barvila ter orodja dobaviteljev v alternativi) x (1+ stopnja prikrajšanosti v Cutru) = 75624552 [glej točko 46 zgoraj] x 1,25 = 94530690.
Eligible costs of land, building and construction (41530657) [see point 45 above] + eligible costs of machinery, equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling (94530690) [see point 59 above] = 136061346.
Upravičeni stroški zemljišča, gradnje in konstrukcije (41530657) [glej točko 45 zgoraj] + upravičeni stroški za stroje, opremo, orodje in barvila ter orodja dobaviteljev (94530690) [glej točko 59 zgoraj] = 136061346.
Offset of any handicap in terms of investment costs for machinery, equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling equal to eligible costs of these items as calculated (94530690) [see point 59 above] – costs of these items in the alternative (75624552) [see point 46 above] = 18906138.
Nadomestilo vsake prikrajšanosti glede naložbenih stroškov za stroje, opremo, orodja in barvila ter orodja dobaviteljev enako upravičenim stroškom za te namene kot je izračunano (94530690 EUR) [glej točko 59 zgoraj] – stroški za te namene v alternativi (75624552 EUR) [glej točko 46 zgoraj] = 18906138.
18906138 (investment costs [see point 61 above]) + 62658707 (operating costs [see point 62 above]) + 745269 (transport costs [see point 63 above]) = 82310114.
18906138 (naložbeni stroški [glej točko 61 zgoraj]) + 62658707 (poslovni stroški [glej točko 62 zgoraj]) + 745269 (prevozni stroški [glej točko 63 zgoraj]) = 82310114.
Net cost handicapInvestment = 82310114136061346 = 60,49% [see point 61 for the new investment cost as corrected].
Prikrajšanost v neto stroškihNaložba = 82310114136061346 = 60,49% [glej točko 61 za stroške nove naložbe kot je popravljeno].
These thresholds are: (i) total cost of the project equalling EUR 50 million, (ii) total gross aid for the project, whether state aid or aid from Community instruments, equalling EUR 5 million. In notifying the proposed aid for De Tomaso, the Italian authorities have complied with the requirements of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Ti pragi so: (i) skupni stroški projekta enaki 50 milijonom EUR, (ii) skupna bruto pomoč za projekt, bodisi državna pomoč, bodisi pomoč instrumentov Skupnosti, enaka 5 milijonom EUR. S prijavo predlagane pomoči za skupino De Tomaso so italijanske oblasti ravnale v skladu z zahtevami člena 88(3) Pogodbe.
Firstly, for a low volume manufacturer like De Tomaso the extent to which automation can help reduce headcount is limited: investments in automation usually pay off only for high or very high volume production.
Prvič, za proizvajalca majhnega obsega kot je skupina De Tomaso, je mera, do katere lahko avtomatizacija pomaga zmanjšati število zaposlenih, omejena: naložbe v avtomatizacijo se ponavadi izplačajo le za proizvodnje velikega ali zelo velikega obsega.
Indeed, the Cutro solution would hardly save any workforce with respect to the alternatives.
Rešitev Cutro bi rešila zelo malo delovne sile glede alternativ.
The project would be carried out in Cutro, Calabria.
Projekt bi bil izveden v Cutru, Kalabrija.