natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, any legitimate expectations and any situation of legal uncertainty as to the fact that the measures in question had to be approved by the Commission in accordance with Article 88, if they constituted State aid, ceased to exist, at the very latest, on 2 February 2002, when the Commission's decisions to initiate the procedure laid down Article 88(2) of the Treaty with respect to the exemptions were published in the Official Journal.
Zato so najpozneje 2. februarja 2002, ko je bila odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi postopka v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe glede oprostitev objavljena v Uradnem listu, prenehala obstajati vsa legitimna pričakovanja in položaj pravne negotovosti v zvezi z dejstvom, da bi morala v skladu s členom 88 zadevne ukrepe, če predstavljajo državno pomoč, odobriti Komisija.
The fact that Ireland systematically reported on the Irish measure from 1995 and that the aid was included in the Commission's annual surveys on State aid, does not create any legitimate expectations in respect of the period as from 3 February 2002.
Dejstvo, da je Irska od leta 1995 sistematično poročala o irskem ukrepu in da je bila pomoč vključena v letne preglede Komisije o državni pomoči, ne ustvarja nikakršnih legitimnih pričakovanj v zvezi z obdobjem od 3. februarja 2002.
On the contrary, this confirms that the Irish authorities were aware of the State aid character of the measure, while they also knew that it had never been authorised under State aid rules.
Nasprotno, to potrjuje, da so se irski organi zavedali značaja državne pomoči ukrepa, pri čemer so prav tako vedeli, da ukrep nikoli ni bil odobren na podlagi pravil državne pomoči.
Reporting on a measure cannot substitute for a Member State's obligation to notify State aid pursuant to Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Poročanje o ukrepu ne more nadomestiti obveznosti države članice, da državno pomoč priglasi v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
Moreover, the surveys report on the amounts of State aid granted irrespective of whether or not it is compatible with the common market or not.
Poleg tega pregledi poročajo o zneskih državne pomoči, ki so bili odobreni ne glede na to, ali je državna pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom ali ne.
In addition, the various annual surveys on State aid discuss aid in the form of tax exemptions in general, but do not refer to the aid for alumina production specifically.
Prav tako različni letni pregledi državne pomoči o pomoči razpravljajo v obliki davčnih oprostitev na splošno in se ne nanašajo izrecno na pomoč za proizvodnjo aluminijevega oksida.
The reference to the Irish measure in its notifications to the World Trade Organisation does not raise legitimate expectations as these notifications are made in a different legal context for different purposes.
Sklicevanje na irski ukrep v obvestilih Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji ne ustvarja legitimnih pričakovanj, saj so ta obvestila sestavljena v drugačnem pravnem okviru za drugačne namene.
In conclusion, the incompatible aid granted from 3 February 2002 until 31 December 2003 should be recovered from its beneficiaries as no general principles of Community law can be invoked to preclude such recovery.
Nezdružljivo pomoč, odobreno od 3. februarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2003, se izterja od upravičencev, saj se ni mogoče sklicevati na nobeno splošno načelo prava Skupnosti za preprečitev takšne izterjave.
It is concluded that the exemptions from excise duty on heavy fuel oils used in the production of alumina granted by France, Ireland and Italy until 31 December 2003 constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Sklenjeno je, da oprostitve plačila trošarine za težka kurilna olja, ki se uporabljajo kot gorivo v proizvodnji aluminijevega oksida, ki so jih odobrile Francija, Irska in Italija do 31. decembra 2003, pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
The aid granted by Ireland before 17 July 1990 constitutes existing aid.
Pomoč, ki jo je dodelila Irska pred 17. julijem 1990, pomeni veljavno pomoč.
The aid granted between 17 July 1990 and 2 February 2002 is to a large extent incompatible with the common market.
Pomoč, dodeljena med 17. julijem 1990 in 2. februarjem 2002, je v veliki meri nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
However, it is not appropriate to order the recovery of that incompatible aid as to do so would be contrary to fundamental principles of Community law.
Vendar pa ni primerno odrediti vračila te nezdružljive pomoči, saj bi to bilo v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli prava Skupnosti.
For the period between 3 February 2002 and 31 December 2003, the aid is partially incompatible with the common market as the beneficiaries did not pay a rate higher than the Community minimum.
Za obdobje med 3. februarjem 2002 in 31. decembrom 2003 velja, da je pomoč delno nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, saj upravičenci niso plačevali višje stopnje kot je najnižja stopnja Skupnosti.
This means that the part of the exemption which exceeds the rate EUR 13,01 per 1000 kg for that period constitutes compatible aid.
To pomeni, da za to obdobje del oprostitve, ki presega stopnjo 13,01 EUR na 1000 kg, pomeni združljivo pomoč.
The remaining aid constitutes incompatible aid.
Preostala pomoč pomeni nezdružljivo pomoč.
Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 provides that where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission must decide that the Member State concerned is to take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
Člen 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 določa, da če se v primerih nezakonite pomoči sprejmejo negativne odločbe, Komisija odloči, da mora zadevna država članica sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da upravičenec vrne pomoč.
France, Ireland and Italy should therefore take all necessary measures to recover the incompatible aid granted from 3 February 2002 onward from the recipients.
Zato morajo Francija, Irska in Italija sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, da prejemniki vrnejo nezdružljivo pomoč, dodeljeno od 3. februarja 2002.
To that end, France, Ireland and Italy should require the respective beneficiaries to repay the aid within two months of notification of this decision.
V ta namen bi morale Francija, Irska in Italija od ustreznih upravičencev zahtevati vračilo pomoči v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi.
The aid to be recovered should include interest calculated in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [35].
Pomoč, ki se izterja, mora vključevati obresti, izračunane v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 [35].
France, Ireland and Italy should send to the Commission an appropriate form reporting progress in recovering the aid, specifying clearly the actual measures taken to effect immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Francija, Irska in Italija morajo Komisiji poslati ustrezen obrazec, s katerim poročajo o napredku vračila pomoči, pri čemer podrobno navedejo dejansko sprejete ukrepe za izvedbo takojšnjega in učinkovitega vračila pomoči.
In addition, they should, within two months of the notification of this Decision, send the documents proving that recovery of the unlawful and incompatible aid from the recipients is under way (for example, circulars, recovery orders issued, etc.) to the Commission.
Poleg tega morajo Komisiji v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi poslati dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da prejemniki dejansko vračajo nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč (na primer okrožnice, izdani nalogi za izterjavo itd.).
In light of the foregoing considerations, the Commission has doubts as to the compatibility with the common market of the exemptions from excise duty on heavy fuel oils used in the production of alumina granted by France, Ireland and Italy since 1 January 2004.
Glede na navedeno Komisija dvomi, da so oprostitve plačila trošarine za težka kurilna olja, ki se uporabljajo kot gorivo v proizvodnji aluminijevega oksida, ki so jih odobrile Francija, Irska in Italija od 1. januarja 2004, združljive s skupnim trgom.
Therefore, on the basis of Articles 4(4) and Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, the Commission decides to extend the formal investigation procedure on these measures in respect of the period after 31 December 2003 and requests the French, Irish and Italian authorities to submit their comments and to provide all information that may assist it in the assessment of those measures within one month of the date of receipt of notification of this decision.
Zato se Komisija glede obdobja po 31. decembru 2003 na podlagi člena 4(4) in člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 odloči za širitev formalnega postopka preiskave teh ukrepov in od francoskih, irskih in italijanskih organov zahteva, da v enem mesecu od datuma prejema uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi predložijo svoje pripombe in zagotovijo vse podatke, ki bi ji pri presoji teh ukrepov lahko pomagali.
Comments can be submitted with regard to both the State aid nature of the measures, within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, and its compatibility with the common market.
Predložene pripombe lahko zadevajo bodisi značaj državne pomoči, ki ga imajo ukrepi v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, ali združljivost pomoči s skupnim trgom.
The Commission requests the French, Irish and Italian authorities to forward a copy of this decision to the beneficiaries of the measures immediately.
Komisija od francoskih, irskih in italijanskih organov zahteva, da kopijo te odločbe nemudoma pošljejo upravičencem ukrepov.
The Commission wishes to remind the France, Italy and Ireland that Article 88(3) of the Treaty has suspensive effect, and would draw their attention to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 which provides that all unlawful aid may be recovered from the recipient.
Komisija želi Francijo, Italijo in Irsko opomniti, da ima člen 88(3) Pogodbe odložilni učinek, in jih opozoriti na člen 14 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999, ki določa, da mora upravičenec vrniti vso nezakonito pomoč.
The Commission warns France, Italy and Ireland that it will inform interested parties by publishing this decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija opozarja Francijo, Italijo in Irsko, da bo obvestila zainteresirane stranke z objavo te odločbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
It will also inform interested parties in the EFTA countries which are signatories to the EEA Agreement, by publication of a notice in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union and will inform the EFTA Surveillance Authority by sending a copy of this decision.
Z objavo obvestila v Dopolnilu EGP k Uradnemu listu Evropske unije bo obvestila tudi zainteresirane stranke v državah Efte, ki so podpisnice Sporazuma EGP, ter s kopijo te odločbe obvestila nadzorni organ Efte.
All such interested parties will be invited to submit their comments within one month of the date of such publication,
Vse zainteresirane stranke bodo povabljene, da predložijo svoje pripombe v enem mesecu od datuma takšne objave –
The exemptions from excise duty granted by France, Ireland and Italy in respect of heavy fuel oils used in the production of alumina until 31 December 2003 constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Oprostitve plačila trošarine, ki so jih do 31. decembra 2003 odobrile Francija, Irska in Italija glede težkih kurilnih olj, uporabljenih v proizvodnji aluminijevega oksida, pomenijo državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
Aid granted between 17 July 1990 and 2 February 2002, to the extent that it is incompatible with the common market, shall not be recovered as this would be contrary to the general principles of Community law.
Pomoč, dodeljena med 17. julijem 1990 in 2. februarjem 2002, kolikor je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, se ne povrne, saj bi bilo to v nasprotju s splošnimi načeli prava Skupnosti.
The aid referred to in Article 1 granted between 3 February 2002 and 31 December 2003 is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3) of the Treaty insofar as the beneficiaries pay at least a rate of EUR 13,01 per 1000 kg of heavy fuel oils.
Pomoč, navedena v členu 1, dodeljena med 3. februarjem 2002 in 31. decembrom 2003, je združljiva s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3) Pogodbe, kolikor upravičenci plačajo najmanj stopnjo 13,01 EUR na 1000 kg težkega kurilnega olja.
The aid referred to in Article 1 granted between 3 February 2002 and 31 December 2003 is incompatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3) of the Treaty insofar as the beneficiaries did not pay a rate of EUR 13,01 per 1000 kg of heavy fuel oils.
Pomoč, navedena v členu 1, dodeljena med 3. februarjem 2002 in 31. decembrom 2003, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom v smislu člena 87(3) Pogodbe, kolikor upravičenci niso plačali stopnje 13,01 EUR na 1000 kg težkega kurilnega olja.
France, Ireland and Italy shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the incompatible aid referred to in Article 4.
Francija, Irska in Italija bodo sprejele vse potrebne ukrepe, da bodo upravičenci vrnili nezdružljivo pomoč, navedeno v členu 4.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law, provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this Decision.
Vračilo se izvede nemudoma in skladno s postopki, določenimi v nacionalni zakonodaji zadevne države članice, če omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvajanje te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall bear interest throughout the period running from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Pomoč, ki se izterja, vključuje obresti, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bila pomoč na razpolago upravičencu, do datuma njene dejanske izterjave.
The interest shall be calculated in conformity with the provisions laid down in Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty.
Obresti se izračunajo v skladu z določbami iz Poglavja V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES.
France, Ireland and Italy shall order, within two months of the date of notification of this Decision, the beneficiaries of the incompatible aid referred to in Article 4 to repay, the aid unlawfully granted plus interest.
Francija, Irska in Italija v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi od upravičencev nezdružljive pomoči, navedenih v členu 4, zahtevajo vračilo nezakonito dodeljene pomoči, skupaj s pripadajočimi obrestmi.
France, Ireland and Italy shall inform the Commission, within two months following notification of this Decision, of the measures planned and already taken to comply with it.
Francija, Irska in Italija v dveh mesecih uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi Komisijo obvestijo o načrtovanih ukrepih in ukrepih, ki so jih že sprejele za uskladitev s to odločbo.
They shall provide information on the recovery using the questionnaire set out in Annex.
Z izpolnitvijo vprašalnika iz Priloge zagotovijo informacije o vračilu.
This Decision is addressed to the French Republic, the Republic of Ireland and the Italian Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Francosko republiko, Republiko Irsko in Italijansko republiko.
OJ C 30, 2.2.2002, p. 17, p. 21 and p. 25.
UL C 30, 2.2.2002, str. 17, str. 21 in str. 25.
OJ L 316, 31.10.1992, p. 19.
UL L 316, 31.10.1992, str. 19.
OJ L 316, 31.10.1992, p. 16.
UL L 316, 31.10.1992, str. 16.
OJ L 182, 10.7.1997, p. 22.
UL L 182, 10.7.1997, str. 22.
OJ L 331, 23.12.1999, p. 73.
UL L 331, 23.12.1999, str. 73.
OJ L 84, 23.3.2001, p. 23.
UL L 84, 23.3.2001, str. 23.
OJ L 321, 23.12.1993, p. 29.
UL L 321, 23.12.1993, str. 29.
OJ L 102, 25.4.1996, p. 40.
UL L 102, 25.4.1996, str. 40.
OJ L 99, 14.4.1999, p. 26.
UL L 99, 14.4.1999, str. 26.
Documents available on www.wto.org The last notification is dated 15 December 2003 with reference number 03-6591 and symbol G/SCM/N/95/EEC/Add.8.
Dokumentacija je na voljo na www.wto.org. Zadnji dopis je datiran 15. decembra 2003 z referenčno številko 03-6591 in oznako G/SCM/N/95/EEC/Add.8.
See, for instance, Commission Decision 2002/174/EC in Case COMP/M.1693 — Alcoa/Reynolds (OJ L 58, 28.2.2002, p. 25).
Glej na primer Odločbo Komisije 2002/174/ES v zadevi COMP/M.1693 – Alcoa/Reynolds (UL L 58, 28.2.2002, str. 25).
See www.glencore.com
Glej www.glencore.com
See www.eurallumina.com, www.comalco.com and www.riotinto.com
Glej www.eurallumina.com, www.comalco.com in www.riotinto.com
See www.alcan.com
Glej www.alcan.com
By comparison, the minimum rate that was established by Directive 92/82/EEC was EUR 13 per tonne.
Za primerjavo, najnižja stopnja, določena z Direktivo 92/82/EGS, je bila 13 EUR na tono.
For heavy oil with sulphur content of less than 2 %.
Za težka olja z manj kot 2 % vsebnostjo žvepla.
OJ C 72, 10.3.1994, p. 3.
UL C 72, 10.3.1994, str. 3.
Commission Decision in Case N 449/2001 — Germany — Ecological Tax Reform (OJ C 137, 8.6.2002, p. 24).
Odločba Komisije v zadevi N 449/2001 – Nemčija – Ekološka davčna reforma (UL C 137, 8.6.2002, str. 24).
See Case 120/73 Lorenz [1973] ECR 1471 and Case C-99/98 Austria v Commission [2001] ECR I-1101.
Glej zadevo 120/73 Lorenz [1973] Recueil 1471 in zadevo C-99/98 Avstrija proti Komisiji [2001] Recueil I-1101.
See Judgment of 6 October 2005 in Case C-276/03 P Scott v Commission, not yet reported.
Glej sodbo z dne 6. oktobra 2005 v zadevi C-276/03 P Scott proti Komisiji, še neobjavljeno.
Communication on Environmental Taxes and Charges in the single Market (COM(97) 9 final of 26.3.1997).
Sporočilo o okoljskih dajatvah in bremenitvah na enotnem trgu (COM(97) 9 končna različica z dne 26.3.1997).
See footnote 21.
Glej opombo 21.
OJ C 31, 3.2.1979.
UL C 31, 3.2.1979.
Addendum au projet de process verbal, 14140/03, of 24.11.2003, http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/fr/03/st14/st14140-ad01.fr03.pdf
Addendum au projet de process verbal, 14140/03, z dne 24.11.2003, http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/fr/03/st14/st14140-ad01.fr03.pdf
See e.g. Commission Decision of 30.6.2004 in Case C 42/2003 (OJ L 165, 25.6.2005, p. 21), decision of 13.2.2002 in Case N449/01 (OJ C 137, 8.6.2002, p. 24), decision of 11.12.2002 in Case N74/A/2002 (OJ C 104, 30.4.2003, p. 9) and decision of 11.12.2001 in cases NN3A/2001 and NN4A/2001 (OJ C 104, 30.4.2003).
Glej npr. Odločbo Komisije z dne 30.6.2004 v zadevi C 42/2003 (UL L 165, 25.6.2005, str. 21), Odločbo z dne 13.2.2002 v zadevi N 449/01 (UL C 137, 8.6.2002, str. 4), Odločbo z dne 11.12.2002 v zadevi N 74/A/2002 (UL C 104, 30.4.2003, str. 9) in Odločbo z dne 11.12.2001 v zadevah NN 3A/2001 ter NN 4A/2001 (UL C 104, 30.4.2003, str. 6).
These cases are particularly relevant, as they also concerned exemptions from energy taxes.
Te zadeve so še posebej pomembne, saj prav tako zadevajo oprostitve plačila energetskih davkov.
An indication as to what the Commission might consider as too low on the other hand is contained in the Commission Decision on the partial refund of the waste water tax in Denmark, decision of 3.4.2002 in case NN30/A-C/2001 (OJ C 292, 27.11.2002, p. 6).
Na drugi strani pa je v Odločbi Komisije o delnem vračilu davka za odpadne vode na Danskem mogoče najti pojasnila za to, kaj bi Komisija štela kot prenizko: Odločba z dne 3.4.2002 v zadevi NN 30/A-C/2001 (UL C 292, 27.11.2002, str. 6).
Case C-5/89 Commission v Germany [1990] ECR I-3437, paragraph 14, and Case C-169/95 Spain v Commission [1997] ECR I-135, paragraph 51; Case T-55/99 CETM v Commission [2000] ECR II-3207, paragraph 121.
Zadeva C-5/89 Komisija proti Nemčiji [1990] Recueil I-3437, odstavek 14 in zadeva C-169/95 Španija proti Komisiji [1997] Recueil I-135, odstavek 51; zadeva T-55/99 CETM proti Komisiji [2000] Recueil II-3207, odstavek 121.
OJ L 316, 31.10.1992, p. 12.
UL L 316, 31.10.1992, str. 12
Judgement of 1 July 2004 in Case T-308/00, Salzgitter AG v. Commission, not yet reported, paragraph 180.
Sodba z dne 1. julija 2004 v zadevi T-308/00, Salzgitter AG proti Komisiji, še neobjavljena, odstavek 180.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION DECISION C(2005) 4436
INFORMACIJE O IZVAJANJU ODLOČBE KOMISIJE C(2005) 4436
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful State aid that has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje informacije o znesku nezakonite državne pomoči, ki je bila dana na razpolago upravičencu:
Date(s) of payment [1]
Datum(i) plačila [1]
Identity of beneficiary
Upravičenec
Please explain in detail how the interests to be paid on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated?
Prosimo, natančno razložite, kako so bile izračunane obresti, ki se morajo plačati za znesek pomoči, ki jo je treba izterjati.
Measures planned and already taken to recover the aid
Načrtovani ukrepi in že sprejeti ukrepi za vračilo pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures have already been taken and what measures are planned to effect an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, natančno opišite že sprejete ukrepe in načrtovane ukrepe za takojšnje in učinkovito vračilo pomoči.
Please also explain what alternative measures are available under national law to effect recovery?
Prav tako razložite, kateri nadomestni ukrepi so na voljo po nacionalnem pravu za izvajanje vračila pomoči.
Please also indicate where relevant the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Kjer je to potrebno, navedite tudi pravno podlago za sprejete/načrtovane ukrepe.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Kdaj bo izterjava pomoči zaključena?
Recovery already effected
Vračilo, ki se že izvaja
Please provide the following details on the amounts of aid that have been recovered from the beneficiary:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje informacije o zneskih pomoči, ki jih je upravičenec že vrnil:
Identify of beneficiary
Upravičenec
Please attach information documenting the repayment of the aid amounts specified in the table under point 3.1 above.
Prosimo, priložite informacije, ki dokazujejo vračilo zneskov pomoči, navedenih v preglednici pod točko 3.1 zgoraj.
(°) Date(s) on which (individual instalments of) the aid has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in so far as a measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements use separate rows).
(°) Datum(i), ko je bila pomoč (posamezni obroki) dana na razpolago upravičencu (kolikor je ukrep sestavljen iz številnih obrokov povračil, uporabljajte ločene vrstice).
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in gross aid equivalents).
Znesek pomoči, dan na razpolago upravičencu (v bruto ekvivalentih pomoči).
(°) Date(s) on which the aid has been repaid.
(°) Datum(i), ko je bila pomoč povrnjena.
The beneficiary of the Italian exemption is Eurallumina.
Upravičenec italijanske oprostitve je Eurallumina.
It is located in Sardinia.
Sedež družbe je na Sardiniji.
A further factor to be taken into account is what the firms concerned have to do in return, to reduce their pollution’. First of all, the measures were not limited to extra production costs.
Nadalje je treba upoštevati, kaj morajo zadevna podjetja storiti v zameno na področju zmanjševanja onesnaževanja.“ Prvič, ukrepi niso bili omejeni na dodatne proizvodne stroške.
All this, however, does not detract from the assessment in recital 60. To the contrary, it confirms that the excise reductions were explicitly intended to strengthen the competitiveness of the beneficiaries vis-à-vis their competitors by reducing their costs.
Vendar pa vse to ne spreminja presoje v uvodni izjavi 60.