natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the anti-dumping duties originally imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 be amended, both of the applicants offered price undertakings in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bil predviden predlog za spremembo protidampinških dajatev, ki so bile prvotno uvedene z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92, sta oba vložnika ponudila cenovne zaveze v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission, by Decision 2005/802/EC [9] accepted the undertakings offered by the applicants.
Komisija je s Sklepom 2005/802/ES [9] sprejela zaveze, ki sta jih ponudila vložnika.
The reasons for accepting these undertakings are set out in that Decision.
Razlogi za sprejetje te zaveze so pojasnjeni v navedenem sklepu.
FORM OF THE MEASURES WITH REGARD TO THE APPLICANTS
OBLIKA UKREPOV V ZVEZI Z VLOŽNIKOMA
The existing measures are applicable to eight CN codes and comprise fixed amounts ranging from EUR 19,61/tonne to EUR 40,63/tonne, depending on the product type.
Obstoječi ukrepi se uporabljajo za osem oznak KN in vključujejo nespremenljive zneske, ki se gibljejo od 19,61 EUR/tono do 40,63 EUR/tono, odvisno od vrste izdelka.
During the current investigation period, however, it was found that almost all the exports by the applicants to the Community were limited to a product type falling under one CN code.
Kljub temu je bilo med obdobjem preiskave ugotovljeno, da je bil skoraj ves izvoz vložnikov v Skupnost omejen na vrsto izdelka, ki je uvrščen pod eno oznako KN.
Accordingly, in view of the absence of information on the other product types, and as the particular type of potash concerned appears now to be the most commercialised, the most reasonable approach for implementing the amended duties is considered to be the replacement of all the fixed amounts with a single ad valorem duty for all potash types manufactured by the applicants,
Ker informacij o ostalih vrstah izdelka ni in ker je videti, da se posebna vrsta zadevne pepelike največ trži, se zdi najbolj smiseln pristop za spremembo dajatev nadomestitev vseh nespremenljivih zneskov z enotno dajatvijo ad valorem za vse vrste pepelike, ki jih proizvajata vložnika –
Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EGS) št. 3068/92 se spremeni kot sledi:
Article 1 shall be amended as follows:
člen 1 se spremeni kot sledi:
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of potassium chloride falling within CN codes 31042010, 31042050, 31042090, and on special mixtures falling within CN codes ex31052010 (TARIC codes 3105201010 and 3105201020), ex31052090 (TARIC codes 3105209010 and 3105209020), ex31056090 (TARIC codes 3105609010 and 3105609020), ex31059091 (TARIC codes 3105909110 and 3105909120), ex31059099 (TARIC codes 3105909910 and 31059920), originating in Belarus or Russia.’;
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz kalijevega klorida, ki se uvršča pod oznake KN 31042010, 31042050, 31042090, in na posebne zmesi, ki se uvrščajo pod oznake KN ex31052010 (oznaki TARIC 3105201010 in 3105201020), ex31052090 (oznaki TARIC 3105209010 in 3105209020), ex31056090 (oznaki TARIC 3105609010 in 3105609020), ex31059091 (oznaki TARIC 3105909110 in 3105909120), ex31059099 (oznaki TARIC 3105909910 in 3105909920), s poreklom iz Belorusije ali Rusije.“;
in paragraph 3, the heading for the table relating to ‘Russia’ shall be replaced by the following:
v odstavku 3 se naslov preglednice v zvezi z „Rusijo“ nadomesti z:
‘Russia (all companies excluding JSC Silvinit and JSC Uralkali — TARIC additional code A999)’;
„Rusija (vse družbe razen družb JSC Silvinit in JSC Uralkali – dodatna oznaka TARIC A999)“;
For the imports of the exporting producers mentioned below, the rate of the anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for the products described in paragraph 1 shall be as follows:
Stopnja protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve, je za uvoz izdelkov, opisanih v odstavku 1, od spodaj navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, naslednja:
JSC Silvinit, Solikamsk, Russia
JSC Silvinit, Solikamsk, Rusija
JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Russia
JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Rusija
in Article 1a, paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:
v členu 1a se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Imports declared for release into free circulation shall be exempt from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Article 1, provided that they are produced by companies from which undertakings are accepted by the Commission and whose names are listed in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 858/2005 and in Commission Decision No 2005/802/EC, as from time to time amended, and have been imported in conformity with the provisions of the same Commission acts.’
Uvoženo blago, ki je deklarirano za sprostitev v prosti promet, se oprosti protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih na podlagi člena 1, pod pogojem, da so ga proizvedle družbe, katerih zaveze je Komisija sprejela in katerih imena so navedena v ustrezni od časa do časa spremenjeni Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 858/2005 in Sklepu Komisije št. 2005/802/ES, ter da je bilo uvoženo v skladu z določbami istih aktov Komisije.“.
See page 79 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 79 tega Uradnega lista.
This was considered sufficient for the purposes of the present partial interim review as an exact determination of sales prices on such markets is not an absolute requirement.
Za namene tega delnega vmesnega pregleda se je to štelo kot zadostno, ker se ne zahteva brezpogojno točne določitve prodajnih cen na takšnih trgih.
In the absence of detailed data, and in view of (i) the variety of delivery terms used for such sales (e.g. cif, fob, FCA etc.)
Ker ni bilo podrobnih podatkov in glede na (i) različne dobavne pogoje za takšno prodajo (na primer CIF, FOB, FCA itd.)
the different logistical arrangements and combinations (e.g. rail + sea, rail only etc.)
različne logistične ureditve in kombinacije (na primer po železnici in morju, samo po železnici itd.)
the differences in distances and transport and handling costs to various destinations in Asia and South America, the Commission was not in a position to determine with exactitude the sales prices to each country.
razlike v razdaljah ter prevoznih in manipulativnih stroških do različnih namembnih krajev v Aziji in Južni Ameriki, Komisija ni mogla natančno določiti prodajnih cen za vsako državo.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1892/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1892/2005
terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
On 9 September 1993, the Council, by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [2] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 30,6 % on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China (the PRC), (the original measures).
septembra 1993 je Svet z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 30,6 % na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) („prvotni ukrepi“).
On 18 January 1997, following an anti-circumvention investigation, this duty was extended by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 to imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the PRC.
januarja 1997, po preiskavi proti izogibanju, se je z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 71/97 ta dajatev razširila na uvoz nekaterih delov za kolesa s poreklom iz LRK.
On 14 July 2000, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 [3], decided that the abovementioned measures should be maintained.
julija 2000, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe, je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1524/2000 [3] sklenil, da se zgoraj omenjeni ukrepi ohranijo.
On 14 July 2005, following an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (the previous investigation), the Council by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005, amended the definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the PRC.
julija 2005, po vmesnem pregledu v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („predhodna preiskava“), je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005 spremenil dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK.
The amended rate of the duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, is 48,5 % for imports of bicycles originating in the PRC.
Spremenjena stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko na meji Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, za kolesa s poreklom iz LRK znaša 48,5 %.
Current investigation
Sedanja preiskava
The Commission received a request lodged by Giant China Co., Ltd (the applicant) for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek, ki ga je vložila družba Giant China Co., Ltd. („vložnik“), za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The request was based on the prima facie evidence, provided by the applicant, that the circumstances on the basis of which measures were established have changed and that these changes are of lasting nature.
Zahtevek je temeljil na prima facie dokazih, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in sicer da so se okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili vzpostavljeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so spremembe trajne narave.
The applicant alleged, inter alia, that the circumstances with regard to market economy status (MES) had changed significantly.
Vložnik je med drugim trdil, da so se okoliščine glede na status tržnega gospodarstva („STG“) bistveno spremenile.
In particular, the applicant claimed that it now fulfilled the requirements to be granted MES pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zlasti je vložnik trdil, da je sedaj izpolnil zahteve za odobritev STG v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, the applicant provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to the enlarged European Union, would lead to a dumping margin significantly below the level of the current measure.
Vložnik je tudi predložil dokaze, ki so pokazali, da bi primerjava normalne vrednosti, ki temelji na njegovih lastnih stroških/domačih cenah in njegovih izvoznih cenah v primerjavi z razširjeno Evropsko unijo, pomenila stopnjo dampinga, ki bi bila bistveno pod ravnjo sedanjega ukrepa.
Accordingly, the applicant alleged that the continued imposition of the measure at its current level was no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Zato je vložnik trdil, da nadaljevanje ukrepov na sedanji ravni ni več potrebno za preprečevanje dampinga.
The Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, initiated on 19 February 2005 by a notice [4] a partial interim review limited in scope to the examination of whether the applicant operated under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively whether the applicant fulfilled the requirements to have an individual duty in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je po posvetu s Svetovalnim odborom 19. februarja 2005 z obvestilom [4] objavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, omejenega na preiskavo o tem, ali je vložnik opravljal dejavnost pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, kakor določa člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, oziroma ali je vložnik izpolnjeval zahteve za individualno dajatev v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sent a questionnaire and a claim form for MES pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation to the applicant.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe vložniku poslala vprašalnik in obrazec zahtevka za STG.
The investigation covered the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2004 (hereinafter referred to as investigation period or IP).
Preiskava je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do 31. decembra 2004 (v nadaljevanju besedila „obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producer, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je proizvajalca izvoznika, predstavnike države izvoznice in proizvajalce Skupnosti uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing, to submit information and to provide supporting evidence and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost pisno izraziti svoje stališče, predložiti podatke in zagotoviti ustrezna dokazila ter zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, ki je bil naveden v obvestilu o začetku.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so vložile ustrezni zahtevek in dokazale, da obstajajo razlogi, da se jih zasliši, je bilo odobreno zaslišanje.
The product concerned is the same as that covered by the original and previous investigations, namely bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles), not motorised, currently classifiable within CN codes 87120010, 87120030 and 87120080 (product concerned).
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot tisti, zajet v prvotno in predhodno preiskavo, in sicer kolesa in druga podobna kolesa (tudi dostavni tricikli), brez motornega pogona, trenutno uvrščena pod oznakami KN 87120010, 87120030 in 87120080 (zadevni izdelek).
No evidence was found suggesting that circumstances with regard to the product concerned had significantly changed since the imposition of the measures.
Nobenega dokaza ni bilo, ki bi kazal, da so se okoliščine glede na zadevni izdelek od uvedbe ukrepov bistveno spremenile.
RESULT OF THE INVESTIGATION
REZULTAT PREISKAVE
In the framework of the investigation which was concluded by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005, it was established that all the Chinese exporting producers applying for MES did not meet the criteria set in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, for the reasons set out in recitals 31 to 33 of the said Regulation.
V okviru preiskave, ki je bila zaključena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005, je bilo ugotovljeno, da vsi kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so vložili zahtevo za STG, niso izpolnili meril, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (31) do (33) omenjene uredbe.
The applicant was amongst the companies denied MES within the framework of that investigation.
Vložnik je bil med družbami, ki jim STG v okviru navedene preiskave ni bil odobren.
In view of the fact that findings regarding the MES claims of the previous investigation remain valid also for the year 2004, i.e. the IP of the current investigation, it was decided, after consulting the Advisory Committee, not to grant MES to the applicant, since it did not meet the criteria set in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na dejstvo, da ostajajo ugotovitve v zvezi z zahtevkom STG prejšnje preiskave veljavne tudi za leto 2004, tj. OP sedanje preiskave, je bilo po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom sklenjeno, da se vložniku ne odobri STG, ker ni izpolnjeval meril, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
In the framework of the previous investigation it was also concluded that the Chinese exporting producers having applied for IT did not meet the necessary requirements for individual treatment as set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation for the reasons set out in recitals 45 to 47 of Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005.
V okviru prejšnje preiskave je bilo tudi sklenjeno, da kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so vložili zahtevek za IO, niso izpolnjevali potrebnih zahtev za individualno obravnavo, kot je določeno v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe, zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (45) do (47) Uredbe (ES) št. 1095/2005.
The applicant was amongst the companies that did not meet the necessary requirements for individual treatment in the framework of the previous investigation and the findings of that investigation remain valid also for the IP of the current investigation.
Vložnik je bil med družbami, ki niso izpolnjevale potrebnih zahtev za individualno obravnavo v okviru prejšnje preiskave, zato ostajajo ugotovitve te preiskave veljavne tudi za OP te preiskave.
In this respect, it was established, that all PRC exporting producers were subject to significant State control with regard to determining their export prices and quantities of the product concerned as explained in recital 13.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bili vsi kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki pod znatnim državnim nadzorom, kar zadeva določitev njihovih izvoznih cen in količin zadevnega izdelka, kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (13).
It was, therefore, concluded that the applicant does not meet the requirements for individual treatment in the framework of the current investigation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da vložnik ne izpolnjuje zahtev za individualno obravnavo v okviru sedanje preiskave.
Given the above, neither MES nor IT could be granted to the applicant.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno vložniku nista bila odobrena niti STG niti IO.
On this basis, it is considered that, in the case of the applicant, the circumstances with regard to dumping have not changed significantly compared to the situation prevailing during the investigation period used in the investigation which led to the amended measures.
Na podlagi tega se šteje, da se v primeru vložnika okoliščine glede dampinga niso bistveno spremenile v primerjavi z razmerami, ki so prevladovale v obdobju preiskave, uporabljene v preiskavi, ki je pripeljala do sprememb prvotnih ukrepov.
Therefore, it is concluded that the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports into the Community of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China should be terminated without amending the measures in force,
Zato se sklene, da se delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske v Skupnost, zaključi brez spreminjanja veljavnih ukrepov –
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se zaključi.
The definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 shall be maintained.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1524/2000, se ohrani.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 71/97 (UL L 16, 18.1.1997, str. 55).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005 (UL L 183, 14.7.2005, str. 1).
OJ C 44, 19.2.2005, p. 24.
UL C 44, 19.2.2005, str. 24.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1893/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1893/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 November 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 19. novembra 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 18 November 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 18. novembra 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1894/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1894/2005
establishing a prohibition of fishing for hake in ICES zone Vb (EC waters), VI, VII, XII, XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain
o prepovedi ribolova na osliča na območjih ICES Vb (vode Skupnosti), VI, VII, XII in XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod špansko zastavo
Hake (Merluccius merluccius)
Oslič (Merluccius merluccius)
Vb (EC waters), VI, VII XII, XIV
Vb (vode Skupnosti), VI, VII, XII, XIV
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1895/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1895/2005
on the restriction of use of certain epoxy derivatives in materials and articles intended to come into contact with food
o omejitvi uporabe nekaterih epoksi derivatov v materialih in izdelkih, namenjenih za stik z živili
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC [1], and in particular Article 5(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1935/2004 z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o materialih in izdelkih, namenjenih za stik z živili, in o razveljavitvi direktiv 80/590/EGS in 89/109/EGS [1] ter zlasti člena 5(1) Uredbe,
To avoid risks to human health and barriers to the free movement of goods, Commission Directive 2002/16/EC of 20 February 2002 on the use of certain epoxy derivatives in materials and articles intended to come into contact with food [2], lays down specific migration limits for 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane bis(2,3-epoxypropyl) ether (‘BADGE’ i.e. Bisphenol-A DiGlycidyl Ether), bis(hydroxyphenyl)methane bis(2,3-epoxypropyl)ethers (‘BFDGE’ i.e. Bisphenol-F DiGlycidyl Ether) and novolac glycidyl ethers (NOGE) and some of their derivatives.
Zaradi izogibanja tveganju za zdravje ljudi in oviram pri prostem pretoku blaga, je direktiva Komisije 2002/16/ES z dne 20. februarja 2002 o uporabi nekaterih epoksi derivatov v materialih in izdelkih, namenjenih za stik z živili [2], določila meje specifične migracije za 2,2-bis(4-hidroksifenil)propan bis(2,3-epoksipropil)eter („BADGE“, tj. bisfenol-A diglicidil eter), bis(hidroksifenil)metan bis(2,3epoksipropil)eter („BFDGE“, tj. bisfenol-F diglicidil eter), novolac glicidil eter („NOGE“) in nekatere njihove derivate.
Directive 2002/16/EC provides that the use and/or the presence of BFDGE and NOGE may only be continued until 31 December 2004.
Direktiva 2002/16/ES določa, da se lahko BFDGE in NOGE uporabljata in/ali sta prisotna le do 31. decembra 2004.
For BADGE the transitional period was extended until 31 December 2005 pending the expected submission of new toxicological data and their evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority (the Authority).
Prehodno obdobje za BADGE je bilo podaljšano do 31. decembra 2005, ko bodo predvidoma pridobljeni novi toksikološki podatki in njihova ocena, ki jo poda Evropska agencija za varnost hrane („Agencija“).
The toxicological data required for BADGE have been transmitted.
Zahtevani toksikološki podatki za BADGE so bili poslani.
The Authority concluded that BADGE, BADGE.H2O and BADGE.2H2O do not raise concern about carcinogenicity and genotoxicity in vivo and that a Tolerable Daily Intake of 0,15 mg/kg body weight can be established for BADGE, BADGE.H2O and BADGE.2H2O.
Agencija ni ugotovila nikakršne grožnje pri BADGE, BADGE.H2O in BADGE.2H2O zaradi rakotvornosti in genotoksičnosti in vivo, zato ugotavlja, da je mogoče določiti dopustni dnevni vnos v višini 0,15 mg/kg za BADGE, BADGE.H2O in BADGE.2H2O.
Therefore a higher specific migration limit SML(T) can be established for BADGE BADGE.H2O and BADGE.2H2O.
Zato je mogoče določiti višjo mejo specifične migracije SML(T) za BADGE BADGE.H2O in BADGE.2H2O.
As regards the BADGE chlorohydrins, in view of the lack of data on genotoxicity in vivo, the Authority considers that the current specific migration limit of 1 mg/kg of food or food simulants remains appropriate.
Ker podatkov o genotoksičnosti in vivo za BADGE.2HCl ni na voljo, Agencija glede produktov BADGE s klorovodikovo kislino meni, da je sedanja meja specifične migracije v višini 1 mg/kg živil in živilskih modelnih raztopin ustrezna.