natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Monetary claim as certified
Denarni zahtevek, kot je potrjen
Principal Amount:
Glavnica:
Amount of reimbursable costs if specified in the court settlement:
Znesek povračljivih stroškov, če so navedeni v sodni poravnavi:
The court settlement is enforceable in the Member State of origin Done at Date
Sodna poravnava je izvršljiva v državi članici izvora V , dne
EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER CERTIFICATE — AUTHENTIC INSTRUMENT
POTRDILO O EVROPSKEM NALOGU ZA IZVRŠBO – JAVNA LISTINA
Member State of origin: Belgium Czech Republic Germany Estonia Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Cyprus Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Hungary Malta Netherlands Austria Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Finland Sweden United Kingdom
Država članica izvora: Belgija Češka Nemčija Estonija Grčija Španija Francija Irska Italija Ciper Latvija Litva Luksemburg Madžarska Malta Nizozemska Avstrija Poljska Portugalska Slovaška Slovenija Finska Švedska Združeno kraljestvo
Court/Authority issuing the certificate
Sodišče/organ, ki izdaja potrdilo
If different, Court/Authority drawing up or registering the authentic instrument
Če je drugače, sodišče/organ, ki sestavi ali overi javno listino
Authentic instrument
Javna listina
Amount of reimbursable costs if specified in the authentic instrument:
Znesek povračljivih stroškov, če so navedeni v javni listini:
The authentic instrument is enforceable in the Member State of origin Done at Date
Javna listina je izvršljiva v državi članici izvora V dne
CERTIFICATE OF LACK OR LIMITATION OF ENFORCEABILITY
POTRDILO O NEIZVRŠLJIVOSTI ALI OMEJITVI IZVRŠLJIVOSTI
(Article 6(2))
(Člen 6(2))
If different, Court/Authority issuing the judgment/Court settlement/Authentic instrument (*)
Če je drugače, sodišče/organ, ki izda sodbo/sodno poravnavo/javno listino (*)
Judgment/Court settlement/ Authentic instrument (*)
Sodba/sodna poravnava/javna listina (*)
This judgment/Court settlement/Authentic instrument (*) was certified as a European Enforcement Order but
Ta sodba/sodna poravnava/javna listina (*) je bila potrjena kot evropski nalog za izvršbo, toda
the judgment/Court settlement/Authentic instrument (*) is no longer enforceable
sodba/sodna poravnava/javna listina (*) ni več izvršljiva
Enforcement is temporarily
Izvršba je začasno
stayed
prekinjena
limited to protective measures
omejena na zaščitne ukrepe
conditional upon the provision of a security which is still outstanding
odvisna od pologa varščine, ki je še neporavnana
Amount of the security:
Znesek varščine:
Other (explain) Done at Date
Drugo (razložite) V , dne
EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE FOLLOWING A CHALLENGE
NADOMESTNO POTRDILO O EVROPSKEM NALOGU ZA IZVRŠBO PO VLOŽITVI PRAVNEGA SREDSTVA
(Article 6(3))
(Člen 6(3))
The following judgment/court settlement/authentic instrument (*) certified as a European Enforcement Order was challenged
Zoper naslednjo sodbo/sodno poravnavo/javno listino (*), potrjeno kot evropski nalog za izvršbo, je bilo vloženo pravno sredstvo.
If different, Court/Authority issuing the judgment/Court settlement/Authentic Instrument (*)
Če je drugače, sodišče/organ, ki izda sodbo/sodno poravnavo/javno listino (*)
Judgment/Court settlement/Authentic Instrument (*)
Sodba/sodna poravnava/javna listina (*)
Upon that challenge the following decision has been handed down and is hereby certified as a European Enforcement Order replacing the original European Enforcement Order.
Po vložitvi pravnega sredstva je bila izdana naslednja odločba in se potrdi kot evropski nalog za izvršbo, ki zamenjuje prvotni evropski nalog za izvršbo.
Court
Sodišče
Principal amount
Glavnica
If the claim is for periodic payments
Če se zahtevek glasi na občasna plačila
… % above the base rate of the ECB
… % nad temeljno obrestno mero ECB
Amount of reimbursable costs if specified in the decision:
Znesek povračljivih stroškov, če so navedeni v odločbi:
Decision is enforceable in the Member State of origin
Odločba je izvršljiva v državi članici izvora
Decision is still subject to the possibility of a further appeal
Na odločbo se lahko še nadalje pritoži
Decision is in compliance with Article 6(1)(b)
Odločba je v skladu s členom 6(1)(b)
The decision concerns matters relating to consumer contracts
Odločba se nanaša na zadeve v zvezi s potrošniškimi pogodbami
The debtor is domiciled in the Member State of origin in the meaning of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
ima dolžnik stalno prebivališče oziroma sedež v državi članici izvora v smislu člena 59 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001
At the time of the decision following the challenge, the claim is uncontested within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) or (c)
V času odločbe o pravnem sredstvu je zahtevek nesporen v smislu člena 3(1)(b) ali (c)
Service of the document instituting the challenge.
Vročitev listine o vložitvi pravnega sredstva.
Did the creditor lodge the challenge?
Ali je upnik vložil pravno sredstvo?
Service of the decision was effected in compliance with Article 13
Vročitev odločbe je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 13
or Service of the decision was effected in compliance with Article 14
ali vročitev odločbe je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 14
or it is proved in accordance with Article 18(2) that the debtor has received the decision
ali je v skladu s členom 18(2) dokazano, da je dolžnik prejel odločbo
The debtor was informed in compliance with Article 18(1)(b) Done at Date
Dolžnik je bil obveščen v skladu s členom 18(1)(b) V , dne
APPLICATION FOR RECTIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF THE EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER CERTIFICATE
ZAHTEVA PO POPRAVKU ALI UMIKU EVROPSKEGA NALOGA ZA IZVRŠBO POTRDILO
(Article 10(3))
(Člen 10(3))
THE FOLLOWING EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER CERTIFICATE
NASLEDNJE POTRDILO O EVROPSKEM NALOGU ZA IZVRŠBO
Judgment/Court settlement/Authentic Instrument
Sodba/sodna poravnava/javna listina
HAS TO BE
MORA BITI
RECTIFIED as due to a material error there is the following discrepancy between the European Enforcement Order certificate and the underlying judgment/court settlement/authentic instrument (explain)
POPRAVLJENO zaradi vsebinske napake, zato obstaja naslednje neskladje med potrdilom o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo in osnovno sodbo/sodno poravnavo/javno listino (razložite)
WITHDRAWN because:
UMAKNJENO, ker:
the certified judgment was related to a consumer contract but was given in a Member State where the consumer is not domiciled within the meaning of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
je bila potrjena sodba povezana s potrošniško pogodbo, vendar je bila izdana v državi članici, v kateri potrošnik nima stalnega prebivališča oziroma sedeža v smislu člena 59 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001
the European Enforcement Order certificate was clearly wrongly granted for another reason (explain) Done at Date
je bilo potrdilo o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo očitno napačno odobreno zaradi drugega razloga (razložite) V , dne
Tel./fax/e-mail:
Tel./faks/e-naslov:
Latvian lats Slovak koruna
estonska krona latvijski lats slovaška krona
Currency: Euro Pound sterling
Valuta:
Maltese lira Slovenian tolar other (explain)
euro funt šterling malteška lira slovenski tolar drugo (razložite)
Cyprus pound Hungarian forint Polish zloty
ciprski funt madžarski forint poljski zlot
Czech koruna Lithuanian litas
češka krona litovski litas
Swedish kronor Estonian kroon
švedska krona
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1870/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1870/2005
opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas and introducing a system of import licences and certificates of origin for garlic imported from third countries
o odprtju in upravljanju tarifnih kvot in uvedbi sistema uvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o poreklu za česen, uvožen iz tretjih držav
Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 41 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške ter zlasti člena 41(1) Akta,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables [1], and in particular Articles 31(2) and 34(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2200/96 z dne 28. oktobra 1996 o skupni ureditvi trga za sadje in zelenjavo [1], in zlasti člena 31(2) in 34(1) Uredbe,
Following negotiations conducted in accordance with Article XXVIII of GATT 1994, the Community amended the conditions governing imports of garlic.
Po pogajanjih, ki so potekala v skladu s členom XXVIII GATT 1994, je Skupnost spremenila pogoje za uvoz česna.
Since 1 June 2001 the normal customs duty for imports of garlic falling within CN code 07032000 has consisted of an ad valorem customs duty of 9,6 % and a specific amount of EUR 1200 per tonne net.
Od 1. junija 2001 je bila običajna carina za uvoz česna pod oznako KN 07032000 sestavljena iz 9,6 % carine ad valorem in posebnega zneska 1200 EUR za neto tono.
However, a quota of 38370 tonnes free of specific duty was opened by an Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and the Argentine Republic pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 for the modification of concessions with respect to garlic provided for in Schedule CXL annexed to the GATT, approved by Council Decision 2001/404/EC [2] (hereinafter the GATT quota).
Vendar je bila s Sporazumom v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko skupnostjo in Argentinsko republiko v okviru člena XXVIII Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 za spremembo koncesij za česen, predvidenih v listi CXL, priloženi GATT, odobrenem s Sklepom Sveta 2001/404/ES [2] (v nadaljevanju „kvota GATT“), odprta kvota 38370 ton brez posebnih carin.
The Agreement stipulates that the quota is to be divided up into 19147 tonnes for imports from Argentina (order numbers 09.4104 and 09.4099), 13200 tonnes for imports from China (order numbers 09.4105 and 09.4100) and 6023 tonnes for imports from other countries (order numbers 09.4106 and 09.4102).
Sporazum določa, da se kvota razdeli na 19147 ton za uvoz iz Argentine (zaporedni številki 09.4104 in 09.4099), 13200 za uvoz iz Kitajske (zaporedni številki 09.4105 in 09.4100) in 6023 ton za uvoz iz drugih držav (zaporedni številki 09.4106 in 09.4102).
Garlic may also be imported outside the GATT quota at the normal duty or on preferential terms under agreements concluded between the Community and certain third countries.
Česen se lahko tudi uvaža poleg kvote GATT z običajno carino ali po preferencialnih pogojih v skladu s sporazumi, sklenjenimi med Skupnostjo in nekaterimi tretjimi državami.
Garlic is an important product of the European Union’s fruit and vegetables sector, with an annual production of around 250000 tonnes in the EU.
Česen je pomemben proizvod sektorja Evropske unije za sadje in zelenjavo z letno proizvodnjo približno 250000 ton v EU.
The annual import from third countries is also significant, ranging from 60000 to 80000 tonnes.
Pomemben je tudi letni uvoz iz tretjih držav, saj znaša 60000 do 80000 ton.
The two main third country suppliers are China (30000 to 40000 tonnes per year) and Argentina (around 15000 tonnes per year).
Dve glavni tretji državi dobaviteljici sta Kitajska (30000 do 40000 ton na leto) in Argentina (približno 15000 ton na leto).
The conditions governing the administration of these quotas are laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/2002 of 2 April 2002 establishing the method for managing tariff quotas and introducing a system of certificates of origin for garlic imported from third countries [3].
Pogoji, ki urejajo upravljanje teh kvot, so določeni v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 565/2002 z dne 2. aprila 2002 o določitvi postopka za upravljanje tarifnih kvot in uvedbi sistema potrdil o poreklu za česen, uvožen iz tretjih držav [3].
In the light of experience gained in the application of that Regulation, some of the current conditions need to be amended in order to simplify and clarify the system.
Z vidika izkušnje pri uporabi navedene uredbe je treba nekatere sedanje pogoje spremeniti, da bi poenostavili in razjasnili sistem.
Since there is a specific duty on non-preferential imports outside the GATT quota, the management of the GATT quota requires the introduction of a system of import licences.
Zaradi posebne carine za nepreferencialni uvoz poleg kvote GATT zahteva upravljanje kvote GATT uvedbo sistema uvoznih dovoljenj.
Such a system should permit the detailed monitoring of all garlic imports.
Tak sistem bi moral omogočati podrobno spremljanje vsega uvoza česna.
The detailed rules for that system should supplement, and might need to derogate from, those laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products [4].
Podrobna pravila za navedeni sistem morajo dopolnjevati pravila, določena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1291/2000 z dne 9. junija 2000 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode [4] ali po potrebi odstopati od teh pravil.
In order to monitor all imports as closely as possible, in particular following recent incidents involving fraud, two categories of import licences should also be introduced for all imports of garlic.
Da bi kar najtesneje spremljali ves uvoz, zlasti po nedavnih zapletih pri goljufiji, je treba uvesti tudi dve kategoriji uvoznih dovoljenj za ves uvoz česna.
Experience shows that fraud is typically carried out by transhipping Chinese garlic through third countries having preferential trade agreements with the European Community.
Izkušnje kažejo, da se goljufije običajno izvajajo s pretovarjanjem kitajskega česna prek tretjih držav, ki imajo preferencialne trgovinske sporazume z Evropsko skupnostjo.
The garlic enters the EU with false documents.
Česen pride v EU z lažnimi dokumenti.
The switchover from one system to the other should be as smooth as possible.
Prehod iz enega sistema na drugega mora biti čim lažji.
To that end, certain of the detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 565/2002 should be carried over and the traditional import timetable should be maintained.
Zato je treba nekatera podrobna pravila za uporabo Uredbe (ES) št. 565/2002 prenesti, standardni časovni razpored za uvoz pa ohraniti.
Imports of garlic should be monitored in accordance with Article 308d of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [5].
Uvoz česna se lahko spremlja v skladu s členom 308d Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [5].
There should continue to be an adequate supply of garlic on the Community market at stable prices whilst avoiding unnecessary market disruptions in the form of severe price fluctuations and adverse effects on the Community producers.
Na trgu Skupnosti bi se morala še nadalje zagotavljati primerna preskrba s česnom po stabilnih cenah ob izogibanju nepotrebnim motnjam na trgu zaradi močnih nihanj cen in neugodnega vpliva na proizvajalce Skupnosti.
To that end, greater competition amongst importers should be encouraged and administrative burdens on importers reduced.
Zato je treba spodbujati večjo konkurenčnost med uvozniki in zmanjšati administrativne obremenitve uvoznikov.
In the interest of existing importers, who normally import substantial quantities of garlic, and also in that of new importers joining the market, who should also have a fair opportunity to apply for import licences for a quantity of garlic under tariff quotas, a distinction should be drawn between traditional importers and new importers.
V interesu obstoječih uvoznikov, ki običajno uvažajo večje količine česna, in tudi v interesu novih uvoznikov na trgu, ki bi tudi morali imeti pravične možnosti, da zaprosijo za uvozna dovoljenja za količino česna v okviru tarifnih kvot, je treba razlikovati med tradicionalnimi uvozniki in novimi uvozniki.
A clear definition of those two categories of importers should be provided and certain criteria relating to the status of the applicants and the use of the import licences allocated should be laid down.
Treba je zagotoviti jasno opredelitev navedenih dveh kategorij uvoznikov in nekatera merila v zvezi s statusom vlagateljev in določiti uporabo dodeljenih uvoznih dovoljenj.
The quantities to be allocated to those categories of importers should be determined on the basis of the quantities actually imported rather than on the basis of the import licences issued.
Količine, ki se dodelijo navedenim kategorijam uvoznikov, je treba določiti na podlagi dejansko uvoženih količin in ne na podlagi izdanih uvoznih dovoljenj.
In order to allow importers in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (hereinafter the new Member States) to benefit under this Regulation, arrangements should be laid down covering the 2005/06 and 2006/07 import periods to ensure that a distinction is made between, on the one hand, traditional importers and new importers within the Community as constituted at 30 April 2004 and, on the other hand, traditional importers and new importers in the new Member States.
Da bi uvozniki iz Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške (v nadaljevanju „nove države članice“) lahko koristili ugodnosti iz te uredbe, je treba določiti režim za uvozno obdobje 2005/2006 in 2006/2007 z namenom zagotovitve razlikovanja na eni strani med tradicionalnimi uvozniki in novimi uvozniki v Skupnosti, kakor je bila sestavljena 30. aprila 2004, in na drugi strani med tradicionalnimi uvozniki in novimi uvozniki v novih državah članicah.
In order to take account of the different trade patterns in the different new Member States, the competent authorities of the new Member States should be allowed to choose between two methods for establishing the reference quantity of their traditional importers.
Da bi upoštevali različne trgovinske vzorce v različnih novih državah članicah, je treba pristojnim organom novih držav članic dovoliti izbiro med dvema metodama za določitev referenčne količine njihovih tradicionalnih uvoznikov.
Applications for import licences to import garlic from third countries presented by importers of both categories should be subject to certain restrictions.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za uvoz česna iz tretjih držav, ki jih predložijo uvozniki obeh kategorij, morajo biti predmet nekaterih omejitev.
Such restrictions are necessary to ensure not only that competition between importers is safeguarded but also that importers genuinely engaged in commercial activity in the fruit and vegetable market are given the opportunity to defend their legitimate trading positions vis-à-vis other importers and that no single importer is able to control the market.
Take omejitve so potrebne, da se upošteva konkurenca med uvozniki in tudi da se uvoznikom, ki se dejansko ukvarjajo s trgovinsko dejavnostjo na trgu s sadjem in zelenjavo, da možnost, da branijo svoje legitimno poslovanje pred drugimi uvozniki, in da noben posamezen uvoznik ne more nadzorovati trga.
In order to safeguard competition between genuine importers and to prevent speculation in the allocation of import licences and any abuse of the system that would run contrary to the legitimate trading positions of new and traditional importers, more stringent controls on the correct use of import licences should be put in place.
Da se zavaruje konkurenca med dejanskimi uvozniki in prepreči špekulacije pri dodeljevanju uvoznih dovoljenj in kakršna koli zloraba sistema, ki bi bila v nasprotju z legitimnim poslovanjem novih in tradicionalnih uvoznikov, je treba uvesti strožji nadzor nad pravilno uporabo uvoznih dovoljenj.
To that end, the transfer of import licences should be prohibited.
Zato je treba prepovedati prenos uvoznih dovoljenj.
With a view to reducing the importers’ administrative burden and the possibilities of fraud, import licence applications should be presented only in the Member State where the importer is entered in a register.
Z namenom, da se zmanjšajo administrativna obremenitev uvoznikov in možnosti goljufij, je treba zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja predložiti samo v državi članici, kjer je uvoznik registriran.
Measures are also needed to keep to a minimum speculative applications for import licences that may result in the tariff quotas not being fully utilised.
Potrebni so tudi ukrepi, da se kar najbolj omejijo špekulativni zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja, ki lahko povzročijo, da se tarifne kvote ne uporabijo v polnosti.
Because of the nature and the value of the product, a security as referred to in Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 should be lodged in respect of each tonne of garlic for which an import licence application is lodged.
Zaradi narave in vrednosti proizvoda je treba položiti varščino iz člena 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1291/2000 za vsako tono česna, za katero je bil vložen zahtevek za uvozno dovoljenje.
The security should be of an amount that is high enough to discourage speculative applications but not so high as to discourage those genuinely engaged in commercial activity in garlic.
Varščina mora biti dovolj visoka, da preprečuje špekulativne zahtevke, vendar ne tako visoka, da bi odvračala tiste, ki se dejansko ukvarjajo s trgovinsko dejavnostjo s česnom.
The most appropriate objective level for the security is 5 % of the average additional duty applicable to imports of garlic falling within CN code 07032000.
Najustreznejša objektivna stopnja varščine je 5 % povprečne dodatne carine, ki se uporablja za uvoz česna pod tarifno oznako KN 07032000.
To ensure that the GATT quota is managed properly, the measures to be taken by the Commission where the quantities of garlic of a specific origin or for a specific quarter covered by import licence applications exceed those fixed by Decision 2001/404/EC, added to the unused quantities from import licences previously issued, should be determined.
Za ustrezno upravljanje kvote GATT je treba določiti ukrepe, ki jih mora sprejeti Komisija, kadar količine česna posebnega porekla ali za posebno četrtletje, ki jih zajemajo zahtevki za uvozno dovoljenje, presegajo količine, določene v Sklepu 2001/404/ES, zvišane za neuporabljene količine iz predhodno izdanih uvoznih dovoljenj.
Where such measures involve applying an allocation coefficient when the import licences are issued, it should be possible to withdraw applications for those import licences with immediate release of the security.
Če taki ukrepi pri izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj vključujejo dodelitveni koeficient, bi moral biti za navedena uvozna dovoljenja omogočen umik zahtevkov s takojšnjo sprostitvijo varščine.
To ensure that the quotas are used properly, the Member States should regularly notify the Commission of the quantities covered by import licences issued by the competent authorities of the Member States and not used by importers.
Da se zagotovi, da se kvote uporabljajo ustrezno, morajo države članice Komisijo redno obveščati o količinah, zajetih z uvoznimi dovoljenji, ki jih izdajo pristojni organi držav članic in ki jih uvozniki niso uporabili.
The quantities covered by import licences issued should take account of import licence applications withdrawn by importers.
Pri količinah, zajetih v izdanih uvoznih dovoljenjih, je treba upoštevati zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, ki so jih uvozniki umaknili.
For the purposes of administering the tariff quotas for garlic, importers lodging applications for import licences should attach a declaration to their applications to the competent authorities of the Member State to the effect that they undertake to comply with the restrictions laid down in this Regulation.
Za upravljanje tarifnih kvot za česen morajo uvozniki, ki na pristojne organe države članice vlagajo zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, tem priložiti izjavo, da se zavezujejo izpolnjevati omejitve iz te uredbe.