natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Those claims were analysed in detail, and where clerical mistakes were identified or certain adjustments could be supported by factual evidence, the necessary amendments to the calculations have been applied.
Navedene trditve so bile podrobno analizirane, če pa so bile ugotovljene stvarne napake ali pa je bilo mogoče na podlagi dejanskih dokazov podpreti nekatere prilagoditve, so bile uvedene potrebne spremembe izračunov.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison, at the same level of trade, of the weighted average import price, as established for the price undercutting calculations, with the non-injurious price of products sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Potrebno povišanje cen je bilo nato, na enaki stopnji trgovine, določeno na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne uvozne cene, kot je bila določena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen, z neškodljivo ceno izdelka, ki ga je na trgu Skupnosti prodala industrija Skupnosti.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adjusting the sales price of each company composing the Community industry to a break-even point and by adding the above-mentioned profit margin.
Neškodljiva cena je bila izračunana s prilagoditvijo prodajne cene vsake družbe, ki sestavlja industrijo Skupnosti, na prag dobička ter z dodano zgoraj navedeno stopnjo dobička.
This resulted in underselling margins of 23 % and 29,5 % for PRC and Vietnam respectively.
To je pomenilo stopnje prodaje pod ceno v višini 23 % za LRK oziroma 29,5 % za Vietnam.
Particularities of the present proceeding
Posebnosti tega postopka
However, as mentioned above, the present proceeding is characterised by distinct and exceptional features, which need to be adequately reflected in the anti-dumping measures.
Kot je bilo navedeno zgoraj, ima ta postopek posebne in izjemne značilnosti, ki jih morajo protidampinški ukrepi ustrezno odražati.
In this respect it is notably important to recall that until January 2005 a substantial part of the product concerned was subject to quantitative restrictions.
V zvezi s tem je še posebej pomembno spomniti, da je bil do januarja 2005 velik del zadevnega izdelka predmet količinskih omejitev.
This background calls for a closer consideration of the adequate level of definitive anti-dumping measures to address the particularities of the present case.
To zahteva podrobnejši premislek o ustrezni stopnji dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov glede na posebnosti tega primera.
As a result a more refined methodology for definitive measures had to be considered, notably with a view to the impact of the quantities imported throughout the period considered upon the situation of the Community industry.
Zato je bilo treba razmisliti o izboljšani metodologiji dokončnih ukrepov, zlasti z vidika vpliva uvoženih količin v obravnavanem obdobju na položaj industrije Skupnosti.
In this respect the existence of the quota covering imports from PRC had a dampening effect and to that extent prevented any material injury being caused to the Community industry as compared to the situation during the IP.
V zvezi s tem je imela kvota na uvoz iz LRK zaviralni učinek in je v tem primeru v primerjavi s stanjem med OP preprečila nastanek kakršne koli znatne škode v industriji Skupnosti.
This is clearly shown in the injury and causality analysis, notably in recitals 187 seq. and 216 seq.
To je jasno razvidno iz analize škode in vzročnosti, zlasti v uvodnih izjavah 187 in naslednje ter 216 in naslednje.
Indeed, in the case at hand it can be observed that the increase in the volume element of dumped imports had a particularly decisive injurious effect on the Community industry after the lapse of the quota.
Dejansko je v tem primeru mogoče opaziti, da je imelo povečanje količine dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti po odpravi kvote odločilen negativni vpliv.
In fact, the economic indicators concerning the situation of the Community industry in particular deteriorated in the first quarter of 2005 although clear indications of material injury can already be found for the last three quarters of 2004 making up the rest of the IP.
Dejansko so se gospodarski kazalniki glede položaja industrije Skupnosti poslabšali zlasti v prvi četrtini 2005, čeprav obstajajo natančni podatki o znatni škodi že za zadnja tri četrtletja leta 2004, ki predstavljajo preostanek OP.
In line with the lesser duty rule as set out in Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, due to the particularities of the case at hand, notably the existence of the quota until the end of 2004, special consideration and attention was therefore given to the quantitative element of injurious dumping.
V skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe je bila zaradi posebnosti tega primera, zlasti obstoja kvote do konca leta 2004, posebna obravnava in pozornost namenjena količinski prvini škodljivega dampinga.
It is considered that only imports above a certain volume threshold prior to the lapsing of the quota can cause material injury so that the injury threshold determined on the basis of the results of the IP has to reflect the fact that certain import quantities did not cause such material injury.
Velja, da lahko samo uvoz nad določenim pragom količine pred odpravo kvote povzroči znatno škodo, tako da mora prag škode, določen na podlagi rezultatov OP, odražati dejstvo, da nekatere uvožene količine niso povzročile takšne znatne škode.
Consequently, the non-materially injurious import quantities had to adequately be reflected in the injury elimination levels.
Zato so morale stopnje odprave škode ustrezno odražati uvožene količine, ki ne povzročajo znatne škode.
In this respect based on Eurostat data the value of total import volumes for the year 2003 from the countries concerned was considered as not yet materially injurious and formed the basis for a proportional adaptation of the injury elimination levels established above.
V zvezi s tem vrednost celotnega obsega uvoza iz zadevnih držav za leto 2003 na podlagi podatkov Eurostata še ni povzročila znatne škode in je bila osnova za sorazmerno prilagoditev stopenj odprave škode, določenih zgoraj.
In a second step this total non-materially injurious value amount (‘NIV’) was allocated to the PRC and Vietnam on the basis of the comparative imports ratio of the product concerned from the countries concerned during the IP.
V drugem koraku je bila ta vrednost celotnega obsega uvoza, ki ne povzroča znatne škode („non-materially injurious value amount – NIV“), dodeljena LRK in Vietnamu na podlagi primerjalnega razmerja uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz zadevnih držav med OP.
In a further step, these two non-materially injurious amounts were set into proportion to the year 2005 imports for the respective country concerned as the first and most recent full year available which was not subject to quantitative restrictions with regard to the product concerned.
Ta dva zneska sta bila nato za zadevno državo postavljena v razmerje z uvozom leta 2005, ki je bilo prvo in zadnje razpoložljivo polno leto, v katerem ni bilo količinskih omejitev za zadevni izdelek.
Finally, in these proportions the duty levels established for the IP were reduced.
Končno so bile stopnje dajatev za OP v teh razmerjih znižane.
This resulted in injury thresholds of 16,5 % and 10 % for the PRC and Vietnam respectively.
Na podlagi tega so bili določeni pragi škode v višini 16,5 % za LRK oziroma 10 % za Vietnam.
On the basis of the same methodology the injury threshold for Golden Step remained well above the established dumping margin of 9,7 % for this particular company, so that in this case in line with the lesser duty rule as set out in Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation the dumping margin shall set the duty level.
Na podlagi enake metodologije je prag škode za družbo Golden Step ostal veliko nad stopnjo dampinga 9,7 %, določeno za to družbo, tako da v tem primeru v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve iz člena 9(4) osnovne uredbe stopnja dampinga določa stopnjo dajatve.
Upon additional definitive disclosure several interested parties commented upon the course of action outlined above.
Po dodatnem dokončnem razkritju je več zainteresiranih strank predložilo pripombe o poteku zgornjega postopka.
Some interested parties declared a preference for a delayed duty system (‘DDS’), which would have left certain annual volume amounts of imports out of the scope of measures.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so izrazile željo po sistemu odloženih dajatev, ki bi nekatere letne količine uvoza izločil iz obsega ukrepov.
However, it should be noted that for administrative and legal reasons it was deemed inappropriate to implement such DDS.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da se zaradi upravnih in pravnih razlogov izvajanje takšnega sistema odločenih dajatev ni zdelo primerno.
Others put the opinion forward that the present case would not warrant a deviation from the standard ad valorem approach based on dumping and underselling margins only.
Drugi so menili, da ta primer ne bo omogočil odstopanja od standardnega pristopa ad valorem, ki temelji zgolj na stopnjah dampinga in prodaje pod ceno.
It is recalled, as set out above, that in particular the fact that the product concerned originating in the PRC was subject to a quota until 2004 necessitated a special methodology in this particular case to duly take account for non-materially injurious imports.
Treba je opozoriti, da, kot je navedeno zgoraj, zlasti dejstvo, da je bil izdelek s poreklom iz LRK predmet kvote do leta 2004, poudarja potrebo po posebni metodologiji, ki mora v tem primeru ustrezno upoštevati uvoz, ki ne povzroča znatne škode.
Therefore, this submission had to be rejected as well.
Zato je bilo treba zavrniti tudi to stališče.
Other interested parties, in particular both from the PRC and from Vietnam, questioned the methodology to identify and to allocate the NIV.
Druge zainteresirane stranke, zlasti iz LRK in Vietnama, so dvomile v metodologijo za določitev in dodelitev NIV.
Firstly, it was argued that the basic Regulation generally does not provide for such approach.
Najprej se je trdilo, da osnovna uredba na splošno ne predvideva takšnega pristopa.
Secondly, it was claimed that an adjustment of underselling margins based on an NIV would be inappropriate because the NIV is allegedly a volume based element, whereas underselling margins are the result of price-comparisons, i.e. only value based.
Drugič se je trdilo, da bi bila prilagoditev stopenj prodaje pod ceno na podlagi NIV neustrezna, ker naj bi bil NIV element, ki temelji na količini, medtem ko so stopnje prodaje pod ceno rezultat primerjave cen, tj. temeljijo samo na vrednosti.
Thirdly, it was put forward that the economic impact of the NIV should not have been assessed on the basis of imports during 2005 but, instead on the basis of the IP.
Tretjič se je trdilo, da gospodarskega vpliva NIV ne bi smeli oceniti na podlagi uvoza med 2005, ampak med OP.
In reply to these submissions it is recalled that the basic Regulation does not set out any specific methodology to establish injury elimination levels.
V odgovoru na te trditve je treba opozoriti, da osnovna uredba ne določa nobene posebne metodologije za določitev stopenj odprave škode.
Consequently, no legal provision restricts the analysis to establishing only underselling margins.
Zato nobena pravna določba ne omejuje analize na določanje zgolj stopenj prodaje pod ceno.
Instead the legal framework provides for discretion to adopt an injury elimination calculation to the specificities of a particular case, provided the circumstances warrant this.
Namesto tega predvideva pravni okvir diskrecijsko pravico do prilagoditve izračuna za odpravo škode posebnostim posameznega primera, če to dovoljujejo okoliščine.
Secondly, it is recalled that the NIV data are value based as they are derived from the 2003 import value amount.
Drugič je treba opozoriti, da podatki NIV temeljijo na vrednosti, saj so pridobljeni iz zneska uvozne vrednosti iz leta 2003.
Consequently such data can clearly be used to adjust underselling margins.
Zato se lahko ti podatki brez dvoma uporabijo za prilagoditev stopenj prodaje pod ceno.
A volume element was only applied in the context of the allocation of the NIV to the PRC and to Vietnam by using the respective volume ratio during the IP.
Element količine je bil na podlagi ustreznega količinskega razmerja med OP uporabljen samo v okviru dodelitve NIV LRK in Vietnamu.
Rationale behind this allocation key was to (i) properly reflect the situation during the IP and (ii) to even out distortions due to differences in average per unit values of Chinese and Vietnamese imports.
S tem ključem za dodelitev naj bi se (i) ustrezno pokazal položaj med OP in (ii) izravnala izkrivljanja zaradi razlik v povprečnih vrednostih kitajskega in vietnamskega uvoza na enoto.
Finally, with regard to the economic impact assessment of the allocated NIV's it was considered to be necessary to refer to the most recent full annual period of imports not subject to a quota regime, i.e. 2005, because the very reason to apply the NIV adjustment essentially to account for the quota peculiarity over the period considered.
Končno, v zvezi z oceno gospodarskega vpliva dodeljenih NIV se je štelo, da se je treba sklicevati na najnovejše enoletno obdobje uvoza, ki ni predmet režima kvot, tj. na leto 2005, saj je bil razlog za prilagoditev NIV predvsem upoštevanje posebnosti glede kvot v obravnavanem obdobju.
While it is admitted that as a rule information subsequent to the IP should not be taken into consideration, Article 6(1) of the basic Regulation provides for exceptions as in the case at hand.
Medtem ko se priznava, da se informacij po OP praviloma ne sme upoštevati, člen 6(1) osnovne uredbe v tem primeru predvideva izjeme.
It should further be noted that Vietnam could not be disregarded in the adjustment exercise because the Chinese quota regime indirectly had an impact on imports originating in Vietnam as well and overall lead to the result that the imports from the countries concerned until 2003 were considered to be not materially injurious.
Nadalje je treba opozoriti, da je bilo treba Vietnam pri izvajanju prilagoditve upoštevati, saj je imel kitajski režim kvot posreden vpliv tudi na uvoz s poreklom iz Vietnama in je na splošno privedel do tega, da se je uvoz iz zadevnih držav do leta 2003 obravnaval kot uvoz, ki ne povzroča znatne škode.
Some interested parties submitted that this approach would discriminate against Chinese exporters.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da bo ta pristop diskriminiral kitajske izvoznike.
In this respect concerns were raised with regard to the result of the methodology, i.e. that despite a higher underselling margin for Vietnam (29,5 %) as compared to the PRC (23 %) this approach leads to overall lower injury elimination levels for Vietnam (10 %) as compared to the PRC (16,5 %).
V zvezi s tem so bili izraženi pomisleki glede rezultata metodologije, tj. da ta pristop kljub višji stopnji prodaje pod ceno za Vietnam (29,5 %) v primerjavi z LRK (23 %) povzroča na splošno nižje stopnje odprave škode za Vietnam (10 %) v primerjavi z LRK (16,5 %).
However, the methodology only takes different import trends from the PRC and Vietnam to the EC into due account.
Vendar metodologija ustrezno upošteva samo različna uvozna gibanja iz LRK in Vietnama v ES.
The respective Vietnamese import share of the product concerned over the period considered was higher.
Posamezni delež uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Vietnama je bil v obravnavanem obdobju višji.
Consequently, its share of non-materially injurious imports was larger as well.
Posledično je bil višji tudi njegov delež uvoza, ki ne povzroča znatne škode.
However, this inevitably results in a larger impact of this adjustment methodology on the Vietnamese underselling margin.
Vendar pa to neizogibno vodi do večjega vpliva te metodologije prilagoditve na vietnamsko stopnjo prodaje pod ceno.
Because the methodology only duly reflects factual differences it is not unjustified discriminatory.
Ker metodologija ustrezno odraža samo dejanske razlike, ne povzroča neupravičene diskriminacije.
Eventually, several interested parties argued that the time to submit comments on the additional definitive disclosure would have been to short and not in line with Article 20(5) of the basic Regulation.
Nazadnje je več zainteresiranih strank trdilo, da je bil čas za predložitev pripomb o dodatnem dokončnem razkritju prekratek in v nasprotju s členom 20(5) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect it is noted that (i) due consideration being given to the urgency of the matter and (ii) given that the additional definitive disclosure concerned only one specific and limited aspect of the case at hand it was considered to be necessary, in line with the provisions of the basic Regulation to set a five days deadline instead of the generally applicable ten days disclosure deadline.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da se je (i) glede na ustrezno obravnavo nujnosti zadeve in (ii) glede na to, da je dodatno dokončno razkritje zadevalo samo določen in omejen vidik tega primera, v skladu z določbami osnovne uredbe zdelo nujno določiti petdnevni rok za razkritje, namesto splošno veljavnega desetdnevnega roka.
However, in this context it should further be noted that where a substantiated request for an extension of this deadline was made by interested parties it was granted.
Vendar je treba nadalje poudariti, da je bila v primeru utemeljene zahteve zainteresiranih strank po podaljšanju tega roka, ta zahteva tudi odobrena.
Some parties, exporting producers as well as importers came forward with price undertaking requests.
Nekatere stranke, proizvajalci izvozniki in uvozniki so predložili zahteve glede cenovne zaveze.
In such cases, an undertaking would have committed the respective exporting producer not to sell below such price level that would have eliminated injurious dumping.
V takšnih primerih bi zaveza posameznega proizvajalca izvoznika obvezala, da ne prodaja pod ravnijo cen, ki bi odpravila škodljivi damping.
In the case of importers, these requests were deemed irrelevant because dumping is caused by exporters for which reason the exporter is responsible and in the actual position to eliminate such dumping by appropriate pricing.
V primeru uvoznikov so se te zahteve zdele nepomembne, saj damping povzročajo izvozniki, ki so tudi odgovorni in dejansko sposobni odpraviti takšen damping z ustreznim oblikovanjem cen.
In the case of exporting producers, the requests had to be rejected because they were made by parties that did not obtain market economy treatment.
V primeru proizvajalcev izvoznikov so bile zahteve zavrnjene, ker so jih predložile stranke, ki niso bile deležne tržnogospodarske obravnave.
In addition, for a product like shoes which is continuously changing due to fashion, it would be practically impossible to set a non-discriminatory price level that equally eliminates injurious dumping for a huge variety of entirely different models.
Poleg tega bi bilo za izdelek, kot so čevlji, ki se zaradi modnih smernic nenehno spreminja, dejansko nemogoče določiti nediskriminacijsko raven cen, ki enakovredno odpravlja škodljiv damping za celo vrsto popolnoma različnih modelov.
Following the definitive disclosure document one sampled Vietnamese exporting producer came forward with a price undertaking request.
Po obvestilu o dokončnem razkritju je vzorčen proizvajalec izvoznik iz Vietnama predložil zahtevo o cenovni zavezi.
Nevertheless, this request had to be rejected for the reasons explained above.
Kljub temu je bila zahteva zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov zavrnjena.
Other parties expressed a preference for a general minimum price respectively a minimum-price in combination with an ad valorem duty, i.e. duties should apply only to imports below a certain minimum price.
Druge stranke so izrazile željo po splošni najnižji ceni oziroma najnižji ceni v povezavi z dajatvijo ad valorem, tj. dajatve morajo veljati samo za uvoz pod določeno najnižjo ceno.
This preference has been reiterated by the Chinese authorities and several other interested parties upon the additional definitive disclosure concerning the form of measures.
Po dodatnem dokončnem razkritju o obliki ukrepov so to željo ponovno poudarili kitajski organi in več drugih zainteresiranih strank.
Such proposals had to be rejected because a combined duty would have led to an unjustified burden on cheap shoes against the favour of more expensive shoes.
Takšni predlogi so bili zavrnjeni, ker bi kombinirana dajatev neupravičeno obremenila poceni čevlje v primerjavi z dražjimi.
It would practically be impossible to identify adequate price categories for a product as diverse as the one under investigation to avoid such unjustified burden.
Skoraj nemogoče bi bilo določiti ustrezne cenovne kategorije za tako raznolik izdelek, kot je izdelek, ki je predmet preiskave, da bi se izognili takšnemu neupravičenemu bremenu.
Furthermore, past experience has shown that a minimum price duty is difficult to monitor and may easily lead to circumvention.
Poleg tega so pretekle izkušnje pokazale, da je dajatev najnižje cene težko nadzirati in da lahko ta dajatev privede do izogibanja ukrepom.
Therefore, a minimum price solution was considered to be impractical and inadequate.
Zato se je rešitev najnižje cene štela za nesmiselno in neustrezno.
A number of importers and non-sampled Vietnamese exporting producers claimed that the proposed course of action gives no consideration to Vietnam's developing country status.
Številni uvozniki in nevzorčeni proizvajalci izvozniki iz Vietnama so trdili, da predlagani potek postopka ne upošteva statusa Vietnama kot države v razvoju.
In this respect, it is noted that the purpose of the measures are to objectively address unfair dumping practices that cause injury.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so ukrepi namenjeni objektivni obravnavi nepoštenega dampinga, ki povzroča škodo.
The economic or development status of any country concerned by a certain proceeding is not taken into account under Articles 2 and 3 of the basic Regulation as a relevant element when determining dumping and injury.
Gospodarski in razvojni položaj katere koli države, ki jo zadeva določen postopek, se po členih 2 in 3 osnovne uredbe ne obravnava kot pomembna prvina pri določanju dampinga in škode.
Adjustments under other factors non-specified in the basic Regulation can only be made if it is demonstrated that they affect price comparability.
Prilagoditve v okviru drugih dejavnikov, ki niso opredeljeni v osnovni uredbi, se lahko izvedejo samo, če se dokaže, da vplivajo na primerljivost cen.
Since the latter was not substantiated by interested parties the aforesaid argument on Vietnam's developing country status had to be rejected.
Ker zainteresirane stranke tega niso dokazale, je bila zgoraj navedena utemeljitev o statusu Vietnama kot države v razvoju zavrnjena.
DEFINITIVE DUTIES
DOKONČNE DAJATVE
In the light of the foregoing, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, it is considered that definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on imports originating in PRC and Vietnam at the level of the lowest of the dumping and injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule as refined by the methodology set out above.
Glede na že navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe velja, da je treba v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve, ki je bilo izboljšano z zgoraj določeno metodologijo, uvesti dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz s poreklom iz LRK in Vietnama v višini nižje od obeh določenih stopenj, stopnje dampinga in škode.
In this respect for the country wide duty levels the injury elimination levels set the ceiling for the anti-dumping duty.
V zvezi s tem stopnje odprave škode določajo zgornjo mejo protidampinške dajatve za stopnje dajatev na ravni države.
However, with regard to Golden Step the duty level was established on the basis of its dumping margin, which was lower than the injury elimination level.
Vendar je bila v zvezi z družbo Golden Step stopnja dajatve določena na podlagi njene stopnje dampinga, ki je bila nižja od stopenj odprave škode.
On the basis of the above, the proposed definitive duties are as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega so predlagane dokončne dajatve naslednje: