natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant claimed that certain information submitted subsequently to the questionnaire reply should have been used to calculate the adjustment for transport and handling costs on the export price.
Vlagatelj je trdil, da bi bilo treba uporabiti nekatere informacije, ki so bile naknadno priložene k izpolnjenemu vprašalniku, za izračun transportnih stroškov in stroškov ravnanja z izdelkom v izvozni ceni.
This claim was accepted and the export price was adjusted upwards.
Ta trditev je bila sprejeta in izvozna cena je bila prilagojena navzgor.
The applicant argued that an adjustment should be made to the normal value for after-sales costs, guarantees and credit costs.
Vlagatelj je trdil, da bi bilo treba izvesti prilagoditev normalne vrednosti za poprodajne stroške in stroške garancije ter kreditiranja.
It also claimed that the costs resulting from the agreement signed between one of the Indonesian producer’s related companies and a distributor in Indonesia should be deducted from the normal value.
Prav tako je trdil, da bi bilo treba stroške, izhajajoče iz sporazuma, podpisanega med enim izmed indonezijskih povezanih podjetij proizvajalca in distributerjem v Indoneziji, odšteti od normalne vrednosti.
These claims had to be rejected because the costs mentioned by the applicant were not included either in the manufacturing costs or in the SGA expenses used to construct normal value.
Te zahteve je bilo treba zavrniti, ker stroški, ki jih je omenil vlagatelj, niso bili vključeni niti v proizvodne stroške niti v PSA stroške za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti.
Therefore, there is no reason to deduct such costs from the normal value.
Zato ni nobenega razloga, da bi se takšni stroški odšteli od normalne vrednosti.
According to the applicant, Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation does not allow to deduct a commission from the export prices of its related companies because no actual commission was paid.
Po mnenju vlagatelja člen 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe ne omogoča, da se provizija odšteje od izvoznih cen povezanih podjetij, ker dejansko ni bila izplačana nobena provizija.
In any event, when making such an adjustment on the export price, a similar adjustment should have been made to the normal value as the company related to the Indonesian producer performed the same functions as those of the applicant’s related companies.
V vsakem primeru, ko se izvaja prilagoditev izvozne cene, bi bilo treba izvesti podobno prilagoditev normalne cene, ker je imelo podjetje, povezano z indonezijskim proizvajalcem, enake funkcije kot povezana podjetja vlagatelja.
Furthermore, as regards the sales through Taiwan, the applicant argued that the calculation of the adjustment included costs concerning production and management.
Razen tega, kar zadeva prodajo preko Tajvana, je vlagatelj trdil, da so bili v izračun prilagoditve vključeni stroški v zvezi s proizvodnjo in upravljanjem.
The apportionment key used should have been based on the number of employees working in the distribution and sales of REWS in the Taiwanese company instead of the total number of employees working in distribution and sales.
Uporabljeni model porazdelitve bi moral temeljiti na številu zaposlenih v distribuciji in prodaji REWS v tajvanskem podjetju namesto celotnega števila zaposlenih v distribuciji in prodaji.
Article 2(10)(i) does not require that a commission in the form of a mark-up has actually been paid, in particular when the trader is related to the exporting producer, if the functions of the trader are similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis.
Člen 2(10)(i) ne zahteva, da bi morala biti provizija v obliki pribitka dejansko plačana, še posebej, kadar je trgovec povezan s proizvajalcem izvoznikom, če so funkcije trgovca podobne funkcijam zastopnika, ki dela na podlagi provizij.
An adjustment for commissions should be made if the parties do not act on the basis of a principal — agent relationship, but achieve the same economic result by acting as buyer and seller.
Prilagoditev provizij je treba izvesti, če stranke ne delujejo na podlagi odnosa naročnik – zastopnik, vendar dosegajo enake gospodarske rezultate, kadar delujejo kot kupci ali prodajalci.
The applicant’s related companies invoiced all the export sales to unrelated customers and determined the selling prices, while the latter placed the orders with them.
Povezana podjetja vlagatelja so fakturirala vso izvozno prodajo nepovezanim strankam in določila prodajne cene, medtem ko so ti zadnji izvedli naročila pri njih.
This was not the case of the company related to the Indonesian producer, whose SGA expenses were used to construct normal value.
Temu ni bilo tako pri podjetju, povezanem z indonezijskem proizvajalcem, čigar PSA stroški so se uporabili za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti.
In fact, the sales on the Indonesian market were made by another related company and, as already explained in recital 51, the SGA expenses of this company were not used to construct normal value.
Pravzaprav je prodajo na indonezijskem trgu opravljalo drugo povezano podjetje, kot je bilo že pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (51), in PSA stroški tega podjetja se niso uporabili za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti.
It was, therefore, not appropriate to make such an adjustment to the normal value and the applicant’s claims could not be accepted.
Zato ni bilo primerno izvesti takšne prilagoditve normalne vrednosti in zahtev vlagatelja ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
As regards the calculation of the adjustment for commissions, it should be stressed that the applicant, although specifically requested, has not provided sufficient details which would have allowed a different allocation of its SGA expenses.
Kar zadeva izračun prilagoditve za provizije, je treba poudariti, da vlagatelj, čeprav se je od njega posebej zahtevalo, ni posredoval dovolj podrobnih podatkov, ki bi omogočili drugačno porazdelitev njegovih PSA stroškov.
In this context, the applicant’s claim on the calculation of the adjustment for commissions had to be rejected.
V tem smislu je bilo treba vlagateljevo zahtevo o izračunu prilagoditve za provizije zavrniti.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value by type was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe se je tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste zadevnega izdelka.
The comparison showed the existence of dumping.
Primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga.
In accordance with the consistent practice of the Community, one dumping margin has been calculated for the two related exporting producers.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso Skupnosti je bila za oba povezana proizvajalca izvoznika izračunana stopnja dampinga.
This dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, duty unpaid, for the related companies Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co., Ltd and Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co., Ltd is 52,6 %.
Stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek neplačane neto cene franko na meji Skupnosti, je za povezana podjetja Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd. in Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd. 52,6 %.
AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING REVIEWED
SPREMEMBA UKREPOV V PREGLEDU
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed for the applicant at the level of the dumping margin found.
Glede na rezultate preiskave je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev za vlagatelja na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
This margin is below the country-wide injury elimination level established for the PRC in the original investigation.
Ta stopnja je pod stopnjo odprave škode za celo državo, določeno za LRK v prvotni preiskavi.
In this context, the amended anti-dumping duty applicable to imports of REWS from Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co., Ltd and Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co., Ltd is 52,6 %.
V tem smislu je spremenjena protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za uvoz REWS podjetij Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd. in Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd. 52,6 %.
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty applicable to the applicant should be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1408/2004.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve se protidampinška dajatev, ki se uporablja za vlagatelja, retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1408/2004.
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose on imports of REWS from the applicant an amended definitive anti-dumping duty and to levy this duty retroactively on imports made subject to registration.
Vse zadevne stranke so bile obveščene o osnovnih dejstvih in preudarkih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala uvesti spremenjena protidampinška dajatev na uvoz REWS vlagatelja in retroaktivno obračunati ta dajatev na uvoz, za katerega velja registracija.
Their comments were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Njihove pripombe so bile preučene in upoštevane, kjer je bilo to primerno.
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation,
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe ta pregled ne vpliva na datum prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2605/2000 –
The table in Article 1(2) Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Preglednici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2605/2000 se spremeni z dodatkom naslednjega:
Rate of duty
Stopnja dajatev
The People’s Republic of China
Ljudska republika Kitajska
The duty hereby imposed shall also be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1408/2004.
Uvedena protidampinška dajatev se retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki je bil registriran v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1408/2004.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co., Ltd and Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co., Ltd.
Carinskim organom je naročeno, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga proizvajata podjetji Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd. in Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise Co. Ltd.
Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1408/2004 (OJ L 256, 3.8.2004, p. 8).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1408/2004 (UL L 256, 3.8.2004, str. 8).
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 692/2005 of 28 April 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain electronic weighing scales (REWS) originating, inter alia, in the People’s Republic of China
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 692/2005 z dne 28. aprila 2005 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2605/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz nekaterih elektronskih trgovskih tehtnic (REWS) po poreklu, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
(Official Journal of the European Union L 112 of 3 May 2005)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 112 z dne 3. maja 2005)
On page 7 in Article 1(1), table, column ‘Company’:
Na strani 7, člen 1(1), tabela, stolpec „Podjetje“:
for ‘Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co., Ltd
namesto „Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd. No.
People’s Republic of China’,
People’s Republic of China“,
read ‘Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd
beri „Shanghai Adeptech Precision Co. Ltd
People’s Republic of China’;
People’s Republic of China“;
for ‘Shanghai Excell M & E Enterprise Co., Ltd
namesto „Shanghai Excell M & E Enterprise Co. Ltd. No.
read ‘Shanghai Excell M & E Enterprise Co. Ltd
beri „Shanghai Excell M & E Enterprise Co. Ltd
People’s Republic of China’.
People’s Republic of China“.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 693/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 693/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 May 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 3. maja 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 2 May 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 2. maja 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 694/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 694/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1555/96 as regards the trigger levels for additional duties on cucumbers and cherries, other than sour cherries
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1555/96 glede sprožitvene ravni za dodatne dajatve za kumare in češnje razen višenj
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1555/96 of 30 July 1996 on rules of application for additional import duties on fruit and vegetables [2] provides for surveillance of imports of the products listed in the Annex thereto.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1555/96 z dne 30. julija 1996 o predpisih glede uporabe dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za sadje in zelenjavo [2] določa nadzor uvoza proizvodov, navedenih v Prilogi k Uredbi.
That surveillance is to be carried out in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 308d of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [3].
Ta nadzor se izvaja v skladu s pravili iz člena 308d Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [3].
For the purposes of Article 5(4) of the Agreement on Agriculture [4] concluded during the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations and in the light of the latest data available for 2002, 2003 and 2004, the trigger levels for additional duties on cucumbers and cherries other than sour cherries should be amended.
Za uporabo člena 5(4) Sporazuma o kmetijstvu [4], sklenjenega v okviru urugvajskega kroga večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj, in na podlagi najnovejših razpoložljivih podatkov za leta 2002, 2003 in 2004 je treba spremeniti sprožitvene ravni za dodatne dajatve za kumare in češnje razen višenj.
Without prejudice to the rules governing the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, the description of the products is deemed to be indicative only.
Brez poseganja v pravila za razlaganje kombinirane nomenklature se šteje, da ima besedilo poimenovanja blaga le okvirni pomen.
The scope of the additional duties for the purposes of this Annex is determined by the scope of the CN codes as they exist at the time of the adoption of this Regulation.
Področje uporabe dodatnih dajatev v tej prilogi je določeno z oznakami KN, kakršne obstajajo v času sprejetja te uredbe.
Where “ex” appears before the CN code, the scope of the additional duties is determined both by the scope of the CN code and the corresponding trigger period.
Kjer so navedene oznake ‚ex’ KN, je področje uporabe dodatnih dajatev hkrati določeno z oznako KN in ustreznim obdobjem veljave.
from 1 October to 31 May
od 1. oktobra do 31. maja
from 1 June to 30 September
od 1. junija do 30. septembra
from 1 May to 31 October
od 1. maja do 31. oktobra
from 1 November to 30 April
od 1. novembra do 30. aprila
from 1 November to 30 June
od 1. novembra do 30. junija
from 1 January to 31 December
od 1. januarja do 31. decembra
from 1 December to 31 May
od 1. decembra do 31. maja
from 1 November to end February
od 1. novembra do konca februarja
Mandarins (including tangerines and satsumas); wilkings and similar citrus hybrids
Mandarine (vključno s tangerinkami in satsuma mandarinami); wilking mandarine in podobni hibridi agrumov
from 1 June to 31 December
od 1. junija do 31. decembra
from 1 January to 31 May
od 1. januarja do 31. maja
From 21 July to 20 November
od 21. julija do 20. novembra
from 1 January to 31 August
od 1. januarja do 31. avgusta
from 1 January to 30 April
od 1. januarja do 30. aprila
from 1 July to 31 December
od 1. julija do 31. decembra
from 21 May to 10 August
od 21. maja do 10. avgusta
Council Regulation (EC) No 695/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 695/2005
amending Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 laying down general rules for the financing of interventions by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section
o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 1883/78 o splošnih pravilih za financiranje intervencij s strani Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada, Jamstvenega oddelka
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [1], and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1258/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [1] in zlasti člena 2(3) Uredbe,
For intervention operations for which a unit amount has not been set by market organisation rules, basic Community financing rules have been set by Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 [2], in particular as to the method of establishing the amounts to be financed, the financing of expenditure resulting from tying up the funds needed for intervention purchasing, the valuation of stocks to be carried over from one year to another and the financing of expenditure resulting from the physical operations of storage.
Za intervencijske ukrepe, za katere znesek na enoto ni bil določen s pravili tržne ureditve, so osnovna pravila, ki se uporabljajo za financiranje Skupnosti določena v Uredbi (EGS) št. 1883/78 [2], zlasti glede metode za določanje zneskov, ki jih je treba financirati, glede financiranja izdatkov, ki nastanejo s sprostitvijo sredstev, potrebnih za intervencijski odkup proizvodov, glede ovrednotenja zalog, ki jih je treba prenesti iz enega proračunskega leta v drugo, in glede financiranja izdatkov, ki nastajajo s fizičnim skladiščenjem.
Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 provides that the interest charges incurred by Member States for the purchase of intervention products are to be financed by the Community according to a uniform method and a uniform interest rate.
V skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1883/78 stroške obresti za intervencijski nakup, ki so jih nosile države članice, financira Skupnost po enotni obračunski metodi in enotni obrestni meri.
It may appear that in a Member State the buying into public intervention of agricultural products can be financed only at interest rates which are substantially higher than the uniform interest rate.
Lahko se izkaže, da je odkup kmetijskih proizvodov v okviru javne intervencije v državi članici možno financirati samo po obrestnih merah, ki so občutno višje kot enotna obrestna mera.
Where the difference between interest rates is more than twice the uniform interest rate for a given Member State, provision should be made for a correcting mechanism to be applied.
Za primer, ko so obrestne mere v zadevni državi članici večje kot dvakratnik enotne obrestne mere, je treba predvideti uporabo korekcijskega mehanizma.
That difference should nevertheless be partially borne by the Member State concerned in order to encourage it to seek the least costly financing method.
Primerno je, da zadevna država članica vseeno krije del te razlike, da bi se jo s tem spodbudilo k iskanju najcenejšega načina financiranja.
Application of this mechanism should be temporary and, consequently, be carried out during the financial years 2005 and 2006.
Uporaba tega mehanizma bi morala biti začasna in jo je tako treba uporabljati v proračunskih letih 2005 in 2006.
It should apply from the beginning of the current financial year,
Uporabljati bi jo bilo treba od začetka tekočega proračunskega leta –
The third subparagraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 is hereby replaced by the following:
Tretji odstavek člena 5 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1883/78 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
‘By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, if the interest rate borne by a Member State is more than twice the uniform interest rate, the Commission may, for the financial years 2005 and 2006, in financing the interest costs incurred by that Member State, cover the amount which corresponds to the uniform rate of interest plus the difference between double that rate and the actual rate borne by the Member State.’
„Ne glede na prvi odstavek lahko Komisija v proračunskih letih 2005 in 2006, če je obrestna mera, ki jo je nosila država članica, več kot dvakratnik enotne obrestne mere, v okviru financiranja stroškov obresti zadevne države članice krije znesek, ki ustreza enotni obrestni meri, povečani za razliko med dejansko obrestno mero, ki jo je nosila država članica, in dvakratnikom enotne obrestne mere.“.
It shall apply to expenditure incurred from 1 October 2004.
Uporablja se za stroške, nastale po 1. oktobru 2004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 696/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 696/2005
to Commission Regulation of 3 May 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 3. maja 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 697/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 697/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 462/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of barley held by the German intervention agency
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 462/2005 glede količine iz stalnega javnega razpisa za izvoz ječmena iz zalog nemške intervencijske agencije
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 [2], lays down the procedure and conditions for the disposal of cereals held by intervention agencies.
Uredba Komisije [2] (EGS) št. 2131/93 določa postopek in pogoje za prodajo žit iz intervencijskih agencij.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 462/2005 [3], opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 500693 tonnes of barley held by the German intervention agency.
Uredba Komisije [3] (ES) št. 462/2005 je odprla stalni javni razpis za izvoz 500693 ton ječmena iz zalog nemške intervencijske agencije.
Germany has informed the Commission of the intention of its intervention agency to increase by 500000 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export.
Nemčija je obvestila Komisijo, da njena intervencijska agencija namerava za 500000 ton povečati količino, razpisano na javnem razpisu za izvoz.
In view of the market situation, the request made by Germany should be granted.
Ob upoštevanju razmer na trgu je treba ugodno odgovoriti na zahtevo Nemčije.
This increase in the quantity put out to tender makes it necessary to alter the quantity stored by region of storage referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 462/2005.
Ob upoštevanju povečanja količine, razpisane na javnem razpisu, je treba spremeniti količine, uskladiščene po regijah iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 462/2005.
Regulation (EC) No 462/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 462/2005 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 462/2005 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 462/2005 se spremeni:
Article 2 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 1000693 tonnes of barley for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Switzerland and the United States of America.
Javni razpis zadeva največjo količino 1000693 ton ječmena za izvoz v vse tretje države, razen v Albanijo, Bolgarijo, Kanado, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Združene države Amerike, Lihtenštajn, Mehiko, Romunijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter Švico.
The regions in which the 1000693 tonnes of barley are stored are listed in Annex I.
Regije, kjer je uskladiščenih 1000693 ton ječmena, so navedene v Prilogi I.
Annex I is replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.