natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lucite’s evidence for this period was therefore not used against it for the purposes of setting the amount of the fine.
Dokazi podjetja Lucite za to obdobje zato niso bili uporabljeni proti njemu za namen določanja zneska globe.
Point 23 (b), third indent (reduction of up to 20 %)
Točka 23 (b), tretja alinea (znižanje za do 20 %)
ICI applied for leniency on 18 October 2004, after the Commission had received leniency submissions from Degussa (20 December 2002), Atofina (3 April 2003) and Lucite (11 July 2003).
Podjetje ICI je zaprosilo za prizanesljivost dne 18. oktobra 2004, potem ko je Komisija prejela prošnje za prizanesljivost od podjetij Degussa (20. december 2002), Atofina (3. april 2003) in Lucite (11. julij 2003).
Pursuant to the Leniency Notice, the Commission examined ICI’s submission in the chronological order in which submissions have been made to evaluate whether it constitutes significant added value within the meaning of point 21.
V skladu z Obvestilom o prizanesljivosti je Komisija pregledala dokaze, predložene s strani podjetja ICI, v kronološkem vrstnem redu njihove predložitve, da bi ugotovila, ali predstavljajo znatno dodatno dokazno vrednost v smislu točke 21.
Based on these criteria the Commission informed ICI that the evidence submitted by ICI did not represent significant added value within the meaning of the Leniency Notice.
Na podlagi teh kriterijev je Komisija obvestila podjetje ICI, da njihovi predloženi dokazi ne predstavljajo znatne dodatne dokazne vrednosti v smislu Obvestila o prizanesljivosti.
CLOSURE OF PROCEEDINGS
ZAKLJUČEK POSTOPKA
In view of the elements brought forward by the undertakings in their replies to the Statement of Objections and at the Oral Hearing, the Commission decided firstly to drop objections against all undertakings in relation to the MMA part of the infringement, secondly to drop objections against BASF AG, Repsol YPF SA, Repsol Quimica SA, Repsol Brønderslev A/S and Repsol Polivar SpA also in relation to PMMA-moulding compounds, PMMA-solid sheet and PMMA-sanitaryware, thirdly to drop objections against Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV, Quinn Plastics GmbH, Quinn Plastics SA in relation to PMMA-moulding compounds and lastly to drop objections against Quinn Plastics SA in relation to PMMA-solid sheet.
Zaradi argumentov, ki so jih predložila podjetja v svojih odgovorih na obvestilo o nasprotovanju in na ustnem zaslišanju je Komisija sklenila, prvič, opustiti nasprotovanje v zvezi z delom kršitve glede MMA, drugič, opustiti nasprotovanje podjetjem BASF AG, Repsol YPF SA, Repsol Quimica SA, Repsol Brønderslev A/S in Repsol Polivar SpA tudi v zvezi s PMMA komponentami za modeliranje, PMMA trdnimi ploščami in PMMA sanitarno opremo, tretjič, opustiti nasprotovanje podjetjem Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV, Quinn Plastics GmbH in Quinn Plastics SA v zvezi s PMMA komponentami za modeliranje, in zadnjič, opustiti nasprotovanje podjetju Quinn Plastics SA v zvezi s PMMA trdnimi ploščami.
The addressees of the Decision and the duration of their involvement were as follows:
Naslovljenci te odločbe in obdobja njihove vpletenosti so naslednji:
Degussa AG, Röhm GmbH & Co. KG (the former Agomer GmbH and Röhm GmbH) and Para-Chemie GmbH, from 23 January 1997 until 12 September 2002;
podjetja Degussa AG, Röhm GmbH & Co. KG (prej Agomer GmbH in Röhm GmbH) ter Para-Chemie GmbH od 23. januarja 1997 do 12. septembra 2002;
Altuglas International SA, Altumax Europe SAS, Arkema SA (formerly Atofina SA) and Elf Aquitaine SA, from 23 January 1997 until 12 September 2002 and Total SA from 1 May 2000 until 12 September 2002;
podjetja Altuglas International SA, Altumax Europe SAS, Arkema SA (prej Atofina SA) in Elf Aquitaine SA od 23. januarja 1997 do 12. septembra 2002 in podjetje Total SA od 1. maja 2000 do 12. septembra 2002;
ICI PLC from 23 January 1997 until 1 November 1999;
podjetje ICI PLC od 23. januarja 1997 do 1. novembra 1999;
Lucite International Ltd and Lucite International UK Ltd from 2 November 1999 until 12 September 2002; and
podjetji Lucite International Ltd in Lucite International UK Ltd od 2. novembra 1999 do 12. septembra 2002; ter
Quinn Barlo Ltd (formerly Barlo Group plc), Quinn Plastics NV (formerly Barlo Plastics NV) and Quinn Plastics GmbH (formerly Barlo Plastics GmbH) from 30 April 1998 until 21 August 2000.
podjetja Quinn Barlo Ltd (prej Barlo Group plc), Quinn Plastics NV (prej Barlo Plastics NV) in Quinn Plastics GmbH (prej Barlo Plastics GmbH) od 30. aprila 1998 do 21. avgusta 2000.
Following the above recitals, the following fines were imposed:
V skladu z zgornjimi določbami so bile naložene naslednje globe:
Degussa AG, Röhm GmbH & Co. KG and Para-Chemie GmbH: EUR 0;
podjetjem Degussa AG, Röhm GmbH & Co. KG in Para-Chemie GmbH: 0 EUR;
Arkema SA, Altuglas International SA and Altumax Europe SAS, jointly and severally liable: EUR 219,13125 million; of this amount Total SA is jointly and severally liable for EUR 140,4 million and Elf Aquitaine SA is jointly and severally liable for EUR 181,35 million;
podjetja Arkema SA, Altuglas International SA in Altumax Europe SAS so skupno in solidarno odgovorna za: 219,13125 milijona EUR; od te vsote je podjetje Total SA skupno in solidarno odgovorno za 140,4 milijona EUR in podjetje Elf Aquitaine SA je skupno in solidarno odgovorno za 181,35 milijona EUR;
ICI PLC: EUR 91,40625 million;
podjetju ICI PLC: 91,40625 milijona EUR;
Lucite International Ltd and Lucite International UK Ltd, jointly and severally liable : EUR 25,025 million; and
podjetji Lucite International Ltd in Lucite International UK Ltd sta skupno in solidarno odgovorni za: 25,025 milijona EUR; ter
Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV and Quinn Plastics GmbH, jointly and severally liable: EUR 9 million.
podjetja Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV in Quinn Plastics GmbH so skupno in solidarno odgovorna za: 9 milijonov EUR.
The undertakings listed above were ordered to bring to an end immediately the infringement referred to in recital 3, insofar as they had not already done so and to refrain from repeating any act or conduct described in recital 3, and from any act or conduct having an identical or similar object or effect.
Zgoraj naštetim podjetjem je bilo odrejeno takojšnje prenehanje s kršitvijo, na katero se nanaša točka 3, če tega še niso storila, in opustitev ponovitve kakršnih koli dejanj, opisanih v določbi 3, ter vseh dejanj, ki bi imela enak ali podoben cilj ali učinek.
Such decisions include:As regards Degussa: Commission decision of 23 November 1984 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/30.907 — Peroxygen products, OJ L 35 of 7.2.1985, p. 1); Commission decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 — Polypropylene, OJ L 230 of 18.8.1986, p. 1).As regards Atofina: Commission decision of 23 November 1984 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/30.907 — Peroxygen products, OJ L 35 of 7.2.1985, p. 1); Commission decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 — Polypropylene, OJ L 230 of 18.8.1986, p. 1) and Commission decision of 27 July 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.865 — PVC II, OJ L 239 of 14.9.1994, p. 14).As regards ICI: Commission decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 — Polypropylene, OJ L 230 of 18.8.1986, p. 1); Commission decision of 27 July 1994 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.865 — PVC II, OJ L 239 of 14.9.1994, p. 14).
Te odločbe vključujejo:Za podjetje Degussa: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. novembra 1984 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/30.907 – Izdelki iz peroksida, UL L 35, 7.2.1985, str. 1); Odločba Komisije z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.149 – Polipropilen, UL L 230, 18.8.1986, str. 1).Za podjetje Atofina: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. novembra 1984 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/30.907 – Izdelki iz peroksida, UL L 35, 7.2.1985, str. 1); Odločba Komisije z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.149 – Polipropilen, UL L 230, 18.8.1986, str. 1) in Odločba Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.865 – PVC II, UL L 239, 14.9.1994, str. 14).Za podjetje ICI: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.149 – Polipropilen, UL L 230, 18.8.1986, str. 1); Odločba Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.865 – PVC II, UL L 239, 14.9.1994, str. 14).
on the European Capital of Culture event for the year 2010
o razglasitvi evropske prestolnice kulture za leto 2010
Having regard to Decision No 1419/1999/EC of 25 May 1999 of the European Parliament and the Council establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2005 to 2019 [1], and in particular Articles 2 paragraph 3 and 4, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi aktivnosti Skupnosti za dogodek Evropske prestolnice kulture za leta 2005 do 2019 [1] in zlasti člena 2(3) in (4) Sklepa,
Having regard to the Selection Panel report of April 2006 submitted to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 2 paragraph 2 of Decision 1419/1999/EC,
ob upoštevanju poročila izbirne komisije iz aprila 2006, predloženega Komisiji, Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v skladu s členom 2(2) Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES,
Considering that the criteria laid down in Article 3 and Annex II of Decision No 1419/1999/EC are entirely fulfilled,
ob upoštevanju, da so merila iz člena 3 in Priloge II Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES, v celoti izpolnjena,
Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission of 23 October 2006,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2006 –
Essen and Pécs are designated as ‘European Capital of Culture 2010’ in accordance with Article 2 paragraph 1 of Decision No 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.
Za evropski prestolnici kulture za leto 2010 v skladu s členom 2(1) Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES, se razglasita Essen in Pécs.
Istanbul is designated as a ‘European Capital of Culture 2010’ in accordance with Article 4 of Decision No 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.
Za evropsko prestolnico kulture za leto 2010 v skladu s členom 4 Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES, se razglasi Carigrad.
All cities designated shall take the necessary measures in order to ensure the effective implementation of Articles 1 and 5 of Decision 1419/1999/EC as amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC.
Vsa razglašena mesta sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi poskrbijo za učinkovito izvajanje členov 1 in 5 Sklepa št. 1419/1999/ES.
As amended by Decision No 649/2005/EC (OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p. 20).
Sklep, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom št. 649/2005/ES (UL L 117, 4.5.2005, str. 20).
of 22 November 2006
z dne 22. novembra 2006
concerning the non-inclusion of ammonium sulphamate, hexaconazole, sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these active substances
o nevključitvi amonijevega sulfamata, heksakonazola, natrijevega tetratiokarbonata in 8-hidroksikinolina v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo te aktivne snovi
(notified under document number C(2006) 5535)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 5535)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1] and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1] in zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 8(2) Direktive,
Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I of that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS določa, da lahko država članica v dvanajstih letih od notifikacije navedene direktive registrira za dajanje v promet fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, ki niso uvrščene v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, in so že v prometu dve leti po datumu notifikacije, medtem ko se te snovi postopno preučujejo v okviru delovnega programa.
Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 [2] and (EC) No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [2] in Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1490/2002 [3] določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge in tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
For active substances for which a notifier fails to fulfil its obligations under these Regulations no completeness check or evaluation of the dossier shall be performed.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere prijavitelj ne izpolni svojih obveznosti v skladu s tema uredbama, se ne opravi pregleda popolnosti ali ocene dokumentacije.
For ammonium sulphamate, hexaconazole, sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline no complete dossier has been submitted within the prescribed time limit.
Za amonijev sulfamat, heksakonazol, natrijev tetratiokarbonat in 8-hidroksikinolin ni bila predložena popolna dokumentacija v predpisanem roku.
Therefore it has not been demonstrated that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing these active substances satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Zato ni bilo dokazano, da pod predlaganimi pogoji uporabe fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo te aktivne snovi, izpolnjujejo splošne zahteve, določene v členu 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
As a consequence, these active substances should not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and Member States should withdraw all authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances.
Zaradi tega se te aktivne snovi ne smejo vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS in države članice morajo odvzeti vse registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo te snovi.
For the active substances for which there is only a short period of advance notice for the withdrawal of plant protection products containing such substances, it is reasonable to provide for a period of grace for disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks for a period no longer than 12 months to allow existing stocks to be used in no more than one further growing.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere je rok predhodnega obvestila o umiku fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo take snovi, kratek, je smiselno predvideti podaljšanje roka za odstranitev, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog za obdobje, ki ni daljše od dvanajstih mesecev zato, da se obstoječe zaloge ne uporabljajo dlje kakor v enem nadaljnjem rastnem obdobju.
For sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline information has been presented and evaluated by the Commission together with Member States experts which has shown a need for further use of the substances concerned.
Podatki za natrijev tetratiokarbonat in 8-hidroksikinolin ki jih je Komisija skupaj s strokovnjaki držav članic predstavila in ocenila podatke, ki so pokazali potrebo po nadaljnji uporabi zadevnih snovi.
It is therefore justified in the present circumstances to prescribe under strict conditions aimed at minimising risk a longer period for the withdrawal of existing authorisations for the limited uses considered as essential for which no efficient alternatives appear currently to be available.
V sedanjih okoliščinah je zato upravičeno, da se pod strogimi pogoji, katerih cilj je zmanjšati tveganje na minimum, predpiše daljši rok za odvzem registracij za omejeno rabo, ki velja za nujno in za katero pri nadzoru škodljivih organizmov trenutno ni na voljo učinkovitih nadomestnih rešitev.
Ammonium sulphamate, hexaconazole, sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline shall not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Amonijev sulfamat, heksakonazol, natrijev tetratiokarbonat in 8-hidroksikinolin se ne vključijo v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Authorisations for plant protection products containing ammonium sulphamate, hexaconazole, sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline are withdrawn by 22 May 2007;
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo amonijev sulfamat, heksakonazol, natrijev tetratiokarbonat in 8-hidroksikinoline odvzamejo do 22. maja 2007;
From 23 November 2006 no authorisations for plant protection products containing ammonium sulphamate, hexaconazole, sodium tetrathiocarbonate and 8-hydroxyquinoline are granted or renewed under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
se po 23. novembru 2006 za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo amonijev sulfamat, heksakonazol, natrijev tetratiokarbonat in 8-hidroksikinoline, ne izda ali podaljša nobena registracija na podlagi odstopanja, predvidenega v členu 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
By derogation from Article 2, a Member State listed in column B of the Annex may maintain authorisations for plant protection products containing substances listed in column A for uses listed in column C of that Annex until 31 May 2010 at the latest.
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 lahko države članice, navedene v stolpcu B Priloge, obdržijo registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo snovi, navedene v stolpcu A, za vrste uporabe, navedene v stolpcu C navedene priloge, najpozneje do 31. maja 2010.
such plant protection products remaining on the market after 22 May 2007 are relabelled in order to match the restricted use conditions;
taka fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki ostanejo na trgu po 22. maju 2007, se ponovno označijo, tako da ustrezajo pogojem za omejeno uporabo;
The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission about the measures taken in application of paragraph 1, and in particular about the actions taken pursuant to points (a) to (d), by 31 December of each year.
Najpozneje do 31. decembra vsako leto zadevna država članica obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, izvedenih na podlagi odstavka 1, in zlasti o ukrepih, izvedenih v skladu s točkami (a) do (d).
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 2 by 22 May 2007 at the latest, the period shall expire on 22 May 2008 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 2 najpozneje do 22. maja 2007 takrat rok poteče najpozneje dne 22. maja 2008.
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 3(1) by 31 May 2010 at the latest, the period shall expire on 30 November 2010 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 3(1) najpozneje do 31. maja 2010, takrat rok poteče najpozneje 30. novembra 2010.
Done at Brussels, 22 November 2006.
V Bruslju, 22. novembra 2006
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/20/EC (OJ L 70, 9.3.2004, p. 32).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/20/ES (UL L 70, 9.3.2004, str. 32).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1044/2003 (OJ L 151, 19.6.2003, p. 32).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1044/2003 (UL L 151, 19.6.2003, str. 32).
Sodium tetrathiocarbonate
Natrijev tetratiokarbonat
Soil disinfection in horticulture.
Razkuževanje zemlje v vrtnarstvu.
Soil disinfection in horticulture and woody crops.
Razkuževanje zemlje v vrtnarstvu in pri gozdnih rastlinah.
Vine cuttings application.
Uporaba pri potaknjencih vinske trte.
Localised soil disinfection in horticulture, orchards, olive orchards and vineyards.
Omejeno razkuževanje zemlje v vrtnarstvu, sadovnjakih, oljčnih nasadih in vinogradih.
Protection of pruning wounds on woody crops.
Zaščita gozdnih rastlin pred poškodbami obrezovanja.
Localised soil disinfection in horticulture.
Razkuževanje zemlje v vrtnarstvu.
establishing revised ecological criteria and the related assessment and verification requirements for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers
o določitvi spremenjenih okoljskih meril in s tem povezanih zahtev za ocenjevanje in preverjanje za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje sredstvom za izboljšanje tal
(notified under document number C(2006) 5369)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 5369)
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a timely review has been carried out of the ecological criteria, as well as of the related assessment and verification requirements, established by Commission Decision 2001/688/EC [2] for the award of the Community eco-label to soil improvers and growing media.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1980/2000 je bil izveden pravočasni pregled okoljskih meril, kakor tudi s tem povezanih zahtev za ocenjevanje in preverjanje, ki jih je določila Odločba Komisije 2001/688/ES [2] za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje sredstvom za izboljšanje tal in rastnim substratom.
In the light of that review, it is appropriate to divide the product group into two separate product groups.
V luči navedenega pregleda je primerno razdeliti skupino proizvodov v dve ločeni skupini proizvodov.
Decision 2001/688/EC should therefore be replaced by two separate Decisions, for soil improvers and growing media respectively.
Odločbo 2001/688/ES je treba zato nadomestiti z dvema ločenima odločbama za sredstva za izboljšanje tal in za rastne substrate.
As regards soil improvers, it is also appropriate in the light of the review, in order to take account of scientific and market developments, to revise the criteria and requirements relating to soil improvers, the period of validity of which expires on 28 August 2007.
Glede sredstev za izboljšanje tal je v luči pregleda tudi primerno, da se upošteva znanstven in tržni razvoj, da se spremenijo merila in zahteve v zvezi s sredstvi za izboljšanje tal, katerih čas veljavnosti poteče 28. avgusta 2007.
The revised ecological criteria and requirements should be valid for a period of four years.
Pregledana okoljska merila in zahteve morajo veljati za obdobje štirih let.
It is appropriate to allow a transitional period of not more than 18 months for producers whose products have been awarded the eco-label before 1 October 2006 or who have applied for such an award before that date, so that they have sufficient time to adapt their products to comply with the revised criteria and requirements.
Primerno je, da se proizvajalcem, ki so za svoje proizvode dobili znak za okolje pred 1. oktobrom 2006 ali so za takšen znak zaprosili pred navedenim datumom, omogoči prehodno obdobje največ osemnajst mesecev, da bodo imeli dovolj časa za prilagoditev svojih proizvodov tako, da bodo ustrezali spremenjenim merilom in zahtevam.
The product group ‘soil improvers’ shall comprise materials to be added to the soil in situ primarily to maintain or improve its physical properties, and which may improve its chemical and/or biological properties or activity.
Skupino proizvodov „sredstva za izboljšanje tal“ sestavljajo materiali, ki se dodajajo tlom na mestu samem predvsem za ohranjanje ali izboljševanje njihovih fizikalnih lastnosti in lahko izboljšajo njihove kemične in/ali biološke lastnosti ali delovanje.
In order to be awarded the Community eco-label for soil improvers, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000, a product must fall within the product group ‘soil improvers’ as defined in Article 1, and must comply with the ecological criteria set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Da se sredstvom za izboljšanje tal podeli znak za okolje na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 1980/2000 mora proizvod spadati v skupino proizvodov „sredstva za izboljšanje tal“, kakor je opredeljena v členu 1, in mora izpolnjevati ekološka merila iz Priloge k tej odločbi.