natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The company claimed that exports of the product concerned to the EC were used to satisfy the requirements under the ALS in respect of raw materials imported.
Družba je trdila, da je izvažala zadevni izdelek v ES zato, da bi izpolnila zahteve v okviru ALS glede uvoženih surovin.
No conclusion was made as to whether or not an adjustment was warranted for this claim, given that it would have no impact on the final outcome of the review investigation.
Sprejel se ni noben sklep o tem, ali je prilagoditev za ta zahtevek utemeljena ali ne, saj to ne bi vplivalo na končni izid preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Other adjustments
Druga nadomestila
The exporting producer claimed, for a limited number of exports, an adjustment on the export price pursuant to Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation, based on the amount of the benefits received on exportation under the Duty Entitlement Passbook Scheme (DEPB) on a post-export basis.
Proizvajalec – izvoznik je za omejeno količino izvoza zahteval prilagoditev izvozne cene v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, kar ustreza višini ugodnosti, ki je bila podeljena za izvoz v okviru sheme „Duty Entitlement Passbook“ („DEPB“) na podlagi naknadnega izvoza.
Under this scheme, the credits received when exporting the product concerned could be used to offset customs duties due on imports of any goods or could be freely sold to other companies.
V okviru te sheme se posojila, prejeta ob izvozu zadevnega izdelka, lahko uporabijo za nadomestilo carine, predpisane za uvoz kakršnega koli blaga, ali prosto prodajo drugim družbam.
In addition, there is no constraint that the imported goods should only be used in the production of the exported product.
Poleg tega ni omejitve, da se mora uvoženo blago uporabljati samo pri proizvodnji izvoznega izdelka.
The producer did not demonstrate that the benefit under the DEPB scheme on a post-export basis affected price comparability and, in particular, that the customers consistently paid different prices on the domestic market because of the DEPB benefits.
Proizvajalec ni dokazal, da je ugodnost v okviru sheme DEPB na podlagi naknadnega izvoza vplivala na primerljivost cen in zlasti, da so stranke na domačem trgu neprestano plačevale različne cene zaradi ugodnosti DEBP.
Therefore, the claim was rejected.
Zato je bila zahteva zavrnjena.
The dumping margin was established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi primerjave tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti s tehtanim povprečjem izvozne cene.
This comparison showed a dumping margin of 0 %.
Ta primerjava je pokazala stopnjo dampinga v višini 0 %.
On the basis of the above facts and considerations, and in view of the information available, it was concluded that, in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the current review investigation should be terminated and the anti-dumping duty of 0 % imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 on imports of PET film produced and exported to the European Community by Jindal Poly Films Limited should be maintained.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenih dejstev in premislekov in ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih informacij se ugotavlja, da je treba v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe zaključiti sedanjo preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom in ohraniti protidampinško dajatev v višini 0 %, ki je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 uvedena na uvoz folije iz PET, ki jo proizvaja in v ES izvaža družba Jindal Poly Films Limited.
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the decision to maintain the current anti-dumping duty was made and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse vpletene stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o ohranitvi sedanje protidampinške dajatve, in dana jim je bila možnost, da dajo pripombe.
The applicants argued that the dumping calculation should have been made on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value to individual export transactions, since they alleged that targeted dumping to a special category of purchaser existed.
Vlagatelji so dokazovali, da bi morala biti stopnja dampinga izračunana na podlagi primerjave tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti s posameznimi izvoznimi posli, saj so domnevali, da je bil damping usmerjen le na „posebno kategorijo kupcev“.
They argued that if sales of a particular film type were made only to customers within a specific end-use segment, this would amount to targeting by customer.
Dokazovali so, da bi se, če bi se določena vrsta folije prodajala samo strankam znotraj določenega segmenta posebne uporabe, lahko govorilo o dampingu, usmerjenem na skupine strank.
They also considered that their approach was justified in view of an increase in Indian production capacity, which they believed related mainly to that particular film type.
Menili so tudi, da je bil pristop utemeljen glede povečanja indijske proizvodne zmogljivosti, za katero se je domnevalo, da je bila pretežno povezana s to določeno vrsto folije.
In this regard, it should first be noted that the film type concerned was sold not only to customers solely purchasing that film type, but also to customers purchasing other film types.
Pri tem je treba najprej pripomniti, da zadevna vrsta folije ni bila prodana samo strankam, ki kupujejo to vrsto folije, ampak tudi strankam, ki kupujejo druge vrste folije.
A comparison of prices for the same film types sold to different customers did not show a pattern of price differentiation by customer.
Primerjava cen istih vrst folije, prodanih različnim strankam, ni pokazala vzorca za diferenciacijo cen po strankah.
In the absence of such a pattern, the existence of an alleged pattern of dumping by model is irrelevant for the purpose of the selection of the dumping calculation methodology, as indicated in Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi odsotnosti takšnega vzorca je obstoj domnevnega vzorca za damping po posameznem modelu nepomemben za izbiro metodologije za izračun stopnje dampinga, kot je navedeno v členu 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, it should also be noted that changes in production capacity are not a relevant factor in determining the methodology to be followed for the determination of the dumping margin either.
Poleg tega je treba tudi pripomniti, da tudi spremembe proizvodne zmogljivosti niso pomemben dejavnik pri določanju metodologije, ki ji je treba slediti pri določitvi stopnje dampinga.
Since no targeting by customer, region or time period was identified, the applicants’ claim was rejected and the comparison of normal value to export price on the basis of a weighted average to weighted average approach was maintained as the appropriate methodology,
Ker usmerjenost glede na skupine strank, regije ali časovno obdobje ni bila ugotovljena, se zahtevek industrije Skupnosti zavrne in primerjava normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno na podlagi pristopa tehtanega povprečja se ohrani kot ustrezna metodologija –
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
JE SPREJEL NASLEDNJO UREDBO:
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India, normally declared under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290, insofar as these measures concern the Indian exporting producer Jindal Poly Films Limited, is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov glede uvoza folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije, ki je navadno deklariran pod oznakami KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, je, kolikor ti ukrepi zadevajo indijskega proizvajalca – izvoznika Jindal Poly Films Limited s tem zaključen.
OJ C 297, 2.12.2004, p. 2.
UL C 297, 2.12.2004, str. 2.
The ALS permits the importation of raw materials free of duty, provided that the company exports a corresponding quantity and value of finished product determined in accordance with officially set standard input-output norms.
ALS dovoljuje dajatev prost uvoz surovin pod pogojem, da družba izvozi ustrezno količino in vrednost končnega izdelka, določeno v skladu z uradno postavljenimi standardnimi input-output normativi.
Imports under the ALS can either be used for the production of export goods or for the replenishment of domestic inputs used to produce such goods.
Uvoz v okviru ALS se lahko uporablja tako za proizvodnjo blaga za izvoz kot tudi za dopolnitev domačih vložkov, uporabljenih za proizvodnjo takšnega blaga.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 391/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 391/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 March 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 10. marca 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 9 March 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 9. marca 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 392/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 392/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 11. marca 2005.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 (OJ L 311, 12.12.2000, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2700/2000 (UL L 311, 12.12.2000, str. 17).
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2286/2003 (OJ L 343, 31.12.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2286/2003 (UL L 343, 31.12.2003, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 393/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 393/2005
With regard to live animals, for reasons of simplification export refunds should not be granted for categories with insignificant trade with third countries.
Kar zadeva žive živali, se zaradi poenostavitve izvozna nadomestila ne dodeljujejo za tiste kategorije, katerih izmenjave s tretjimi državami so zanemarljive.
The refunds on all frozen cuts should be brought into line with those on fresh or chilled cuts other than those from adult male bovine animals.
Zneske nadomestil za vse zamrznjeno meso je treba uskladiti z zneski za sveže ali ohlajeno meso, razen za meso odraslega goveda moškega spola.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2199/2004 (OJ L 380, 24.12.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2199/2004 (UL L 380, 24.12.2004, str. 1).
to the Commission Regulation of 9 March 2005 fixing export refunds on beef
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 9. marca 2005 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa
Commission Regulation (EC) No 394/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 394/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, and derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje sheme enotnega plačila, predvidenega v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, ter o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) No 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 [1], and in particular Article 145(c) and (d) and (q) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembi uredb (EGS) št. 2019/93, (ES) št. 1452/2001, (ES) št. 1453/2001, (ES) št. 1454/2001, (ES) št. 1868/94, (ES) št. 1251/1999, (ES) št. 1254/1999, (ES) št. 1673/2000, (EGS) št. 2358/71 in (ES) št. 2529/2001 [1], in zlasti člena 145(c), (d) in (q) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 [2] introduces the implementing rules for the single payment scheme that will apply from 2005.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 795/2004 [2] je uvedla pravila za izvajanje sheme enotnega plačila, ki se bodo uporabljala od leta 2005.
The administrative and operational implementation of the scheme which has started, on that basis, at national level, has shown the need of further detailed rules on some aspects of the scheme and to clarify and adapt certain aspects of the existing rules.
Administrativno in operativno izvajanje sheme, ki se je na navedeni podlagi začelo na nacionalni ravni, je pokazalo potrebo po dodatnih podrobnih pravilih za nekatere vidike sheme ter razjasnitvi in prilagoditvi nekaterih vidikov obstoječih pravil.
In particular, it is appropriate to specify the application of the definition of multiannual crops in relation to the eligibility conditions for land to be put on set-aside and in relation to the energy crops aid scheme referred to in Article 88 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Zlasti je primerno, da se podrobno opredeli uporaba opredelitve večletnih rastlin pri izpolnjevanju pogojev zemljišča za praho in shemi pomoči za energetske rastline iz člena 88 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
For administrative reasons, in order to limit the creation of fractions of payment entitlements to the extent necessary, Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 provides that in case of transfer, before splitting an existing entitlement, all existing fractions should be used.
Iz upravnih razlogov člen 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 določa, da je v primeru prenosa treba uporabiti vse obstoječe dele pred razdelitvijo obstoječe pravice, zato da bi se nastajanje delov pravic do plačila omejilo na nujni obseg.
It is appropriate to specify that that provision should refer to existing fractions of entitlements of the same nature, such as normal entitlements, set-aside entitlements, entitlements accompanied by an authorisation in accordance with Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.
Primerno je navesti, da se določba nanaša na obstoječe dele pravic iste narave, kot so navadne pravice, pravice za praho, pravice do plačil, ki jih spremlja dovoljenje v skladu s členom 60 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
According to Article 7(6) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004, farmers who leased or sold hectares shall not benefit from the mechanism provided for in that Article.
V skladu s členom 7(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 se mehanizem iz navedenega člena ne uporablja za kmete, ki dajo v zakup ali prodajo hektarje.
As far as the aim of that mechanism is not undermined by the fact of buying and selling or leasing an equivalent number of hectares, it should be provided that the mechanism should also apply in those cases.
Kolikor nakup in prodaja ali dajanje v zakup enakovrednega števila hektarjev ne ogrozijo namena mehanizma, je treba določiti, da se mehanizem uporablja tudi v navedenih primerih.
Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 provides for the reversion to the national reserve of a part of the reference amount in particular situations.
Člen 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 določa, da se v nekaterih primerih del referenčnega zneska vrne v nacionalno rezervo.
For administrative reasons it is appropriate to allow Member States to apply such reduction above a ceiling to be defined.
Iz upravnih razlogov je primerno omogočiti državam članicam, da tako zmanjšanje uporabijo nad zgornjo mejo, ki jo je treba določiti.
Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 assimilates lease to purchase of land for investment purpose.
Člen 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 enači zakup z nakupom zemljišča za naložbo.
Investments in production capacity made under the form of a lease should also be taken into account.
Upoštevati je treba tudi naložbe v proizvodno zmogljivost v obliki zakupa.
Article 22(2) of Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 aims to take into account the cases of farmers who find themselves in special situations deriving from the fact of having bought land that was under a lease during the reference period.
Člen 22(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 795/2004 je namenjen primeru kmetov, ki so se znašli v posebnem položaju zaradi nakupa zemljišča, ki je bilo v zakupu v referenčnem obdobju.
It is appropriate to specify the scope of application of the provision by giving a definition of the condition of the lease to be taken into account.
Primerno je opredeliti področje uporabe določbe z opredelitvijo pogojev zakupa, ki ga je treba upoštevati.
The second subparagraph of Article 46(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 provides that, except in case of force majeure or exceptional circumstances, a farmer may transfer his payment entitlements without land only after he has used, within the meaning of Article 44 of that Regulation, at least 80 % of his payment entitlements during at least one calendar year or, after he has given up voluntarily to the national reserve all the payment entitlements he has not used in the first year of application of the single payment scheme.
Drugi pododstavek člena 46(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 določa, da razen v primeru višje sile ali izjemnih okoliščin lahko kmet prenese svoje pravice do plačila brez zemljišča le, ko je v smislu člena 44 uporabil najmanj 80 % svojih pravic do plačila v najmanj enem koledarskem letu ali ko se je prostovoljno odrekel v korist nacionalne rezerve vsem pravicam do plačila, ki jih ni uporabil v prvem letu izvajanja sheme enotnega plačila.
It is appropriate to specify the conditions of application of that provision.
Primerno je opredeliti pogoje uporabe navedene določbe.
Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 795/2004 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
From 1 January 2006, Article 51 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 864/2004 [3], authorises Member States to allow secondary crops to be cultivated on the eligible hectares during a period of maximum three months starting each year on 15 August.
Od dne 1. januarja 2006 člen 51 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 864/2004 [3], dovoli državam članicam, da dovolijo pridelovanje naknadnih posevkov na upravičenih hektarjih, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, za obdobje največ treh mesecev, ki se vsako leto začne s 15. avgustom.
Taking into account that until 31 December 2004 such practices are compatible with the existing rules on direct payments and that farmers could again be authorised under that new provision from 1 January 2006, the fact of interrupting such practices for one year would result in severe economical problems for farmers used to such practices and would also provoke practical and specific problems in terms of eligibility of the land.
Ker so do 31. decembra 2004 te prakse združljive z obstoječimi pravili za neposredna plačila in da kmetje od 1. januarja 2006 lahko znova pridobijo dovoljenje na podlagi navedene nove določbe, bi enoletna prekinitev teh praks povzročila resne gospodarske težave kmetom, ki so navajeni na te prakse, pa tudi praktične in posebne težave pri pogojih za upravičenost zemljišča.
Therefore, in order to guarantee the continuity of the measure and to allow farmers, in Member States where such decision would be taken, to take their sowing decisions in time, it is necessary and duly justified to provide, by way of derogation from Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, for the application in 2005 of that option.
Da se zagotovi nepretrganost ukrepa v državah članicah, kjer se bodo tako odločili, in da se omogoči kmetom, da se pravočasno odločijo glede sejanja, je potrebno in ustrezno utemeljeno, da se predvidi uporaba navedene možnosti v letu 2005, z odstopanjem od Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
Due to the fact that the single payment scheme is applicable starting from 1 January 2005, it is appropriate that this Regulation applies retroactively from that date.
Ker se shema enotnega plačila uporablja z začetkom z dne 1. januarja 2005, je primerno, da se ta uredba uporablja retroaktivno od navedenega datuma.
Regulation (EC) No 795/2004 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 795/2004 se spremeni:
in Article 2, points (c) and (d) are replaced by the following:
V členu 2 se točki (c) in (d) nadomestita z naslednjim besedilom:
“permanent crops” shall mean non-rotational crops other than permanent pasture that occupy the land for five years or longer and yield repeated harvests including nurseries as defined in point (G/5) of Annex I to Commission Decision 2000/115/EC, with the exception of multiannual crops and the nurseries of such multiannual crops.
‚trajni nasad’ pomeni nasad rastlin, ki niso vključene v kolobar ter niso trajni travniki, ki so na istem zemljišču najmanj pet let in ki dajejo večkratne pridelke, vključno z drevesnicami, kakor so opredeljene v točki (G/5) Priloge I k Odločbi Komisije 2000/115/ES, razen večletnih rastlin in drevesnic le-teh;
For the purpose of Article 54(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and in case of areas which are also subject to an application for the aid for energy crops provided for in Article 88 of that Regulation, short rotation coppice (CN code ex06029041) Miscanthus sinensis (CN code ex06029051) Phalaris arundicea (reed canary grass) (CN code ex12149090) shall be considered as multiannual crops.
Za namen člena 54(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in v primeru površin, ki so predmet tudi zahtevka za pomoč za energetske rastline iz člena 88 navedene Uredbe, veljajo panjevec kratke rotacije (oznaka KN ex06029041) Miscanthus sinensis (kitajski prstasti trstikovec) (oznaka KN ex06029051), Phalaris arundinacea (pisana čužka) (oznaka KN ex12149090) za večletne rastline.
However, for the purpose of Article 44(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, shall be considered as eligible hectares:
Za namen člena 44(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 za upravičene hektarje veljajo:
the areas planted with those crops between 30 April 2004 and 10 March 2005,
površine, posejane z navedenimi rastlinami med 30. aprilom 2004 in 30. marcem 2005,
the areas planted with these crops before 30 April 2004 and leased or acquired, between 30 April 2004 and 10 March 2005 in view of applying for the single payment scheme.
površine, posejane z navedenimi rastlinami pred 30. aprilom 2004 in dane v zakup ali kupljene med 30. aprilom 2004 in 30. marcem 2005 zaradi vloge za shemo enotnega plačila.
“multiannual crops” shall mean crops of the following products:
„večletne rastline“ pomeni rastline naslednjih vrst:
Raspberries, blackberries, mulberries and loganberries
Maline, robide, murve in Loganove robide
Black-, white- or redcurrants and gooseberries
Črni, beli ali rdeči ribez in kosmulje
Cranberries, bilberries and other fruits of the genus Vaccinium’
Brusnice, borovnice in drugo sadje rodu Vaccinium“
in Article 3, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
V členu 3 se odstavek 4 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall apply only if the farmer still needs to declare or transfer a payment entitlement or a fraction of a payment entitlement with a fraction of a hectare after having declared or transferred existing payment entitlements or fractions of payment entitlements of the same nature.’;
Odstavka 2 in 3 se uporabita samo, če je kmetu še treba prijaviti ali prenesti pravico do plačila ali del pravice do plačila z delom hektarja, potem ko je prijavil ali prenesel obstoječe pravice do plačila ali dele pravic do plačila iste narave.“
in Article 7, paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:
V členu 7 se odstavek 6 nadomesti z naslednjim:
For the purpose of paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4, hectares transferred by sale or by lease, and not replaced by a corresponding number of hectares, shall be included in the number of hectares which the farmer declares.’;
Za namen odstavkov 1, 2, 3 in 4 se hektarji, ki se prenesejo s prodajo ali zakupom in se ne nadomestijo z ustreznim številom hektarjev, štejejo v število hektarjev, ki jih prijavi kmet.“