natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this respect, it should be firstly noted that the Commission analysed the imports from Turkey separately, as they were the most significant in volume after those from the PRC.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opozoriti, da je Komisija uvoz iz Turčije analizirala ločeno, ker je bil po obsegu takoj za tistim iz LRK.
For the purpose of clarity, transparency and completeness of the analysis and in view of the revision of the statistical data mentioned in recital 19, a more detailed table with revised imports from third countries is presented below:
Zaradi jasnosti, preglednosti in popolnosti analize in glede na spremembo statističnih podatkov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi 19, so spodaj navedeni podrobnejši revidirani podatki o uvozu iz tretjih držav:
Turkey (thousand square feet)
Turčija (tisoč kvadratnih čevljev)
Average prices (EUR/square foot)
Povprečne cene (EUR/kvadratni čevelj)
Romania (thousand square feet)
Romunija (tisoč kvadratnih čevljev)
Pakistan (thousand square feet)
Pakistan (tisoč kvadratnih čevljev)
Mexico (thousand square feet)
Mehika (tisoč kvadratnih čevljev)
Other countries excluding those mentioned above (thousand square feet)
Druge države, razen držav, ki so navedene zgoraj (tisoč kvadratnih čevljev)
This table shows that solely imports from Turkey increased substantially, i.e. from 353 thousand square feet in 2001 to 1677 thousand square feet in the IP at downward prices below those of the Community industry.
Ta preglednica kaže, da se je samo uvoz iz Turčije znatno povečal, tj. od 353 tisoč kvadratnih čevljev leta 2001 na 1677 tisoč kvadratnih čevljev v OP po nizkih cenah, nižjih od cen industrije Skupnosti.
However, as explained in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, a significant part of these imports was made by a cooperating Community producer in order to complete its product range or to re-export the product after having been trimmed and repackaged and therefore these quantities could not have caused injury to the Community industry.
Kljub temu je, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 66 začasne uredbe, znaten del tega uvoza pripadel sodelujočemu proizvajalcu Skupnosti, da bi dopolnil svojo paleto izdelkov ali da bi izdelke, potem ko so bili ukrojeni in ponovno pakirani, ponovno izvozil, zato te količine niso mogle povzročiti škode industriji Skupnosti.
As for the remaining quantities, they represented a low and stable market share around 2 %, with the exception of the IP, and as also explained in recital 66 of the provisional Regulation, these imports may have contributed, albeit not significantly, to the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Preostale količine so predstavljale nizek in stabilen tržni delež okoli 2 %, z izjemo OP, in kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 66 začasne uredbe, obstaja verjetnost, da je ta uvoz prispeval k znatni škodi, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, čeprav v manjši meri.
With regard to the ‘other countries’ (excluding Turkey) mentioned in the table above, their imports represented a market share of close to or even lower than de minimis in the IP and with a downward or relatively stable trend over the period considered.
V zvezi z ostalimi državami (razen Turčije) iz zgornje preglednice je njihov uvoz v OP obsegal tržni delež blizu ali celo pod stopnjo de minimis s padajočim ali relativno stabilnim trendom v obravnavanem obdobju.
The overall market share of imports from these countries, decreased from 9,6 % in 2001 to 8,3 % in the IP.
Celotni tržni delež uvoza iz teh držav se je zmanjšal z 9,6 % leta 2001 na 8,3 % v OP.
On this basis, it is definitively considered that none of these countries could have caused injury to the Community.
Na podlagi tega se dokončno šteje, da nobena od teh držav ni mogla povzročiti škode industriji Skupnosti.
The argument of the Chinese trading company cited at the end of recital 33 according to which ‘the methodology used by the Commission to selectively use price trends is not compatible with rulings on several WTO provisions’ was vague and unsubstantiated and has therefore been rejected.
Trditev kitajske trgovske družbe, navedena na koncu uvodne izjave 33, v kateri je navedeno, da „metodologija, ki jo je uporabila Komisija za selektivno uporabo cenovnih trendov, ni v skladu s številnimi sklepi glede določb STO“, ni bila natančno opredeljena ter dovolj utemeljena in je bila zato zavrnjena.
On the basis of the above, and in the absence of any other submitted information substantiating the effect of imports from countries other than the PRC, it is definitively considered that such imports could not be a determining reason for the injurious situation of the Community industry.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in ker ni bilo predloženih nobenih drugih informacij, ki bi utemeljile vpliv uvoza iz drugih držav, razen LRK, se dokončno šteje, da takšen uvoz ni mogel biti odločujoč razlog za škodljive razmere industrije Skupnosti.
It was further argued that the injury suffered by the Community industry was in a significant part caused by its losses in export markets.
Nadalje se je trdilo, da je znatna škoda, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, v veliki meri nastala zaradi njenih izgub na izvoznih trgih.
It was submitted that if any losses in overseas market are attributed to a country subject to an anti-dumping investigation, the action itself points to a discriminatory intention.
Trdilo se je, da če se državi, proti kateri poteka protidampinška preiskava, pripiše kakršna koli izguba na čezmorskih trgih, ima sam ukrep diskriminatoren namen.
It should be firstly noted that the Commission's analysis of the Community industry's situation including its profitability takes account solely of its business activity for the product concerned within the Community.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da analiza Komisije o položaju industrije Skupnosti, vključno z njeno dobičkonosnostjo, upošteva samo njeno poslovno dejavnost v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom znotraj Skupnosti.
Therefore, any injury allegedly caused by losses in export markets is not taken into consideration in the framework of this investigation.
Zato se v okviru te preiskave ne upošteva škode, ki je domnevno nastala zaradi izgub na izvoznih trgih.
Furthermore, the exports of the Community industry were mentioned in so far as necessary to interpret some aggregated indicators such as for example stocks.
Poleg tega je bil izvoz industrije Skupnosti naveden, v kolikor je treba razložiti nekatere agregirane kazalce, kot so na primer zaloge.
Therefore, it is considered that the analysis of the situation in the Community industry was made in full accordance with the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da je bila analiza položaja industrije Skupnosti izvedena popolnoma v skladu z osnovno uredbo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning causality, recitals 59 to 72 set out in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe v zvezi z vzročnostjo, se uvodne izjave 59 do 72 začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments concerning Community interest, recitals 73 to 82 set out in the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobene druge pripombe v zvezi z interesom Skupnosti, se uvodne izjave 73 do 82 začasne uredbe potrdijo
In view of the claim referred to in recitals 15, 16 and 24, the import data used in the determination of the injury elimination level, as described in recital 86 of the provisional Regulation, was adjusted in order to take into account the fact that certain quantities of chamois leather exported to the Community from the PRC in the form of patchwork were of lower quality than the chamois leather sold by the Community industry.
Glede na trditve iz uvodnih izjav 15, 16 in 24 so bili podatki o uvozu za izračun stopnje odprave škode iz uvodne izjave 86 začasne uredbe prilagojeni, da bi se upoštevalo dejstvo, da je bila določena količina semiš usnja v kosih, ki ga je LRK izvozila v Skupnost, slabše kakovosti od semiš usnja, ki ga prodaja industrija Skupnosti.
In the light of the above, the injury elimination level finally determined was 58,9 %.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bila stopnja odprave škode dokončno določena na 58,9 %.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of chamois leather originating in the PRC at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Skupnosti in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz semiš usnja s poreklom iz LRK na ravni najnižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
In this case, the duty rate should accordingly be set at the level of the injury found.
Zato mora biti v tem primeru stopnja dajatve določena na ravni ugotovljene stopnje škode.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duty is 58,9 %.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je dokončna dajatev 58,9 %.
I. DEFINITIVE COLLECTION OF THE PROVISIONAL DUTY
I. DOKONČNO POBIRANJE ZAČASNIH DAJATEV
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margin found in the PRC and given the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation should be definitively collected to the extent of the amount of the definitive duty imposed.
Glede na velikost stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene v LRK, in glede na stopnjo škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti, se šteje za potrebno, da se zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, dokončno poberejo v višini uvedene dokončne dajatve.
As the definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty amounts provisionally secured in excess of the definitive rate of the anti-dumping duty should be released,
Ker je dokončna dajatev nižja od začasne dajatve, bi se zneski, zavarovani z začasno dajatvijo, ki presegajo dokončno stopnjo protidampinške dajatve, morali sprostiti –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of chamois leather and combination chamois leather, whether or not cut to shape, including crust chamois leather and combination crust chamois leather originating in the People's Republic of China, falling within CN codes 41141010 and 41141090.
Na uvoz semiš usnja in kombinacije semiš usnja, ne glede na to, ali je rezan v oblike ali ne, vključno s „crust“ semiš usnjem in kombinacijo „crust“ semiš usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN 41141010 in 41141090, se uvede dokončna protidampinška dajatev.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products produced by all companies in the People's Republic of China shall be 58,9 %.
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve na neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve za izdelke, ki so jih proizvedle vse družbe v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, je 58,9 %.
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 439/2006 on imports of chamois leather originating in the People's Republic of China shall be definitively collected at the rate of the definitive duty imposed pursuant to Article 1.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 439/2006 na uvoz na uvoz semiš usnja s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se dokončno poberejo na stopnji dokončne dajatve, ki jo uvaja člen 1.
The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo znesek dokončne dajatve, se sprostijo.
OJ L 80, 17.3.2006, p. 7.
UL L 80, 17.3.2006, str. 7.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1339/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1339/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 September 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 13. septembra 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 12 September 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. septembra 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1340/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1340/2006
determining the extent to which applications lodged in August 2006 for import licences for certain pigmeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 can be accepted
o določitvi obsega, v katerem se lahko sprejmejo zahtevki, vloženi augusta 2006 za uvozna dovoljenja za nekatere proizvode iz prašičjega mesa v okviru mesa v okviru režima, predvidenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1233/2006
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 of 16 August 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota of pigmeat allocated to the United States of America [1], and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1233/2006 z dne 16. avgusta 2006 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja uvoznih tarifnih kvot za prašičje meso, dodeljenih Združenim državam Amerike [1], in zlasti člena 5(5) Uredbe,
Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za obdobje od 1. julija do 30. septembra 2006, vloženi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1233/2006, se odobrijo, kot je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Application for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1233/2006 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za obdobje od 1. oktobra do 31. decembra 2006 se lahko vložijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1233/2006 za celotno količino, kot je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 14.
UL L 225, 17.8.2006, str. 14.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1341/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1341/2006
determining the extent to which applications lodged in August 2006 for import licences for certain poultrymeat sector products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 can be accepted
o določitvi obsega, v katerem se lahko sprejmejo zahtevki, vloženi avgusta 2006 za uvozna dovoljenja za nekatere proizvode iz perutninskega mesa v okviru mesa v okviru režima, predvidenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1232/2006
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 of 16 August 2006 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota of poultrymeat allocated to the United States of America [1] and in particular Article 5(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1232/2006 z dne 16. avgusta 2006 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja uvoznih tarifnih kvot za perutninsko meso, dodeljenih Združenim državam Amerike [1], in zlasti člena 5(5) Uredbe,
Applications for import licences for the period 1 July to 30 September 2006 submitted pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 shall be met as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za obdobje od 1. julija do 30. septembra 2006, vloženi v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1232/2006, se odobrijo, kot je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Application for import licences for the period 1 October to 31 December 2006 may be lodged pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1232/2006 for the total quantity as referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za obdobje od 1. oktobra do 31. decembra 2006 se lahko vložijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1232/2006 za celotno količino, kot je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
OJ L 225, 17.8.2006, p. 5.
UL L 225, 17.8.2006, str. 5.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1342/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1342/2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 921/2006 [6] should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new Regulation.
Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 921/2006 [6] je zato treba razveljaviti in jo nadomestiti z novo uredbo.
Regulation (EC) No 921/2006 is repealed.
Uredba (ES) št. 921/2006 se razveljavi.
OJ L 169, 21.6.2006, p. 21.
UL L 169, 21.6.2006, str. 21.
Export refunds on beef and veal applicable from 13 September 2006
Izvozna nadomestila v sektorju govejega mesa, ki se uporabljajo od 13. septembra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1343/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1343/2006
Rates of the refunds applicable from 13 September 2006 to eggs and egg yolks exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 13. septembra 2006 uporabljajo za jajca in jajčne rumenjake, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1344/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1344/2006
Export refunds on pigmeat applicable from 13 September 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za prašičje meso od 13. septembra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1345/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1345/2006
Export refunds on eggs applicable from 13 September 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za jajca od 13. septembra 2006 dalje
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1346/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1346/2006
Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 13 September 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za perutninsko meso od 13. septembra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1347/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1347/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 September 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 14. septembra 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 13 September 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1348/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1348/2006
Applications for import licences were submitted to the competent authority during the week of 4 to 8 September 2006, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 950/2006, for a total quantity equal to or exceeding the quantity available for serial number 09.4343.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja so bili pristojnim organom predloženi v tednu od 4. do 8. septembra 2006 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 950/2006 za skupno količino, ki je enaka ali presega razpoložljivo količino za zaporedno številko 09.4343.
Licences shall be issued within the quantitative limits set in the Annex to this Regulation in respect of applications for import licences submitted from 4 to 8 September 2006, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/2006.
Za zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja, predložene od 4. do 8. septembra 2006 v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 950/2006, se dovoljenja izdajo v okviru količin, ki so navedene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Week of 4 to 8 September 2006 % of requested quantity to be granted
% zahtevanih količin za izdajo za teden od 4. do 8. septembra 2006
2006/07 Marketing year
Tržno leto 2006/2007
ACP Protocol signatory countries
Države, podpisnice Protokola AKP
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1349/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1349/2006
Those increases should involve:
Navedeno povečanje se nanaša na:
300000 tonnes of common wheat in Hungary;
navadno pšenico, v višini 300000 ton na Madžarskem,
41294 tonnes of barley in the Czech Republic, 20636 tonnes in Slovakia, 17997 tonnes in Hungary.
ječmen v višini 41294 ton na Češkem, 20636 ton na Slovaškem, 17997 ton na Madžarskem.
Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2006 (OJ L 205, 27.7.2006, p. 15).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1138/2006 (UL L 205, 27.7.2006, str. 15).
no intervention stock of this cereal in this Member State’.
v tej državi članici ni intervencijskih zalog za to žito.“
Fax (32-2) 287 25 24
Telefaks : (32-2) 287 25 24
Fax (420) 296 80 64 04
Telefaks: (420) 296 80 64 04
Fax (45) 33 95 80 34
Telefaks: (45) 33 95 80 34
e-mail: mij@dffe.dk and pah@dffe.dk
E-naslov: mij@dffe.dk in pah@dffe.dk
Fax 1 (49-228) 6845-3985
Telefaks 1: (49-228) 6845-3985
Fax 2 (49-228) 6845-3276
Telefaks 2: (49-228) 6845-3276
Fax (372) 737 12 01
Telefaks: (372) 737 12 01
Telephone (30-210) 212 47 87 and 212 47 54
Telefon: (30-210) 212 47 87 in 212 47 54
Fax (30-210) 212 47 91
Telefaks: (30-210) 212 47 91
Fax (34-91) 347 48 38
Telefaks: (34-91) 347 48 38
Telephone (33-1) 44 18 22 29 and 23 37
Telefon: (33-1) 44 18 22 29 in 23 37
Fax (33-1) 44 18 20 08 and 44 18 20 80
Telefaks: (33-1) 44 18 20 08 in 44 18 20 80
e-mail: m.meizels@onigc.fr and f.abeasis@onigc.fr
E-naslov: m.meizels@onigc.fr in f.abeasis@onigc.fr
Fax (353-53) 914 28 43
Telefaks: (353-53) 914 28 43
Fax (39) 06 49 49 97 61
Telefaks: (39) 06 49 49 97 61
Fax (371) 702 78 92
Telefaks: (371) 702 78 92
Fax (370-5) 268 50 61
Telefaks: (370-5) 268 50 61
Fax (36-1) 219 89 05
Telefaks: (36-1) 219 89 05
Fax (31) 475 31 89 39
Telefaks: (31) 475 31 89 39
Fax (48) 22 661 78 26
Telefaks: (48) 22 661 78 26
Fax (386) 1 478 92 00
Telefaks: (386) 1 478 92 00
Fax (421-2) 53 412 665
Telefaks: (421-2) 53 412 665
Fax (46-3) 619 05 46
Telefaks: (46-3) 619 05 46
Fax (44-191) 226 58 24
Telefaks: (44-191) 226 58 24
e-mail: cerealsintervention@rpa.gov.uk
E-naslov: cerealsintervention@rpa.gov.uk
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1350/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1350/2006
imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tungsten electrodes originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 8, 9, 11(2) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 8, 9, 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe,
On 4 November 2005, the Commission received a complaint lodged pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Communities (the basic Regulation) by Eurometaux (the complainant) on behalf of a producer representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of certain tungsten electrodes.
Komisija je 4. novembra 2005 prejela pritožbo, ki jo je na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti („osnovna uredba“) vložil Eurometaux („pritožnik“) v imenu proizvajalca, ki predstavlja večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje nekaterih volframovih elektrod Skupnosti.
This complaint contained evidence of dumping of certain tungsten electrodes from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the opening of a proceeding.
Ta pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu nekaterih volframovih elektrod s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za upravičenost začetka postopka.
On 17 December 2005, the proceeding was opened by the publication of a notice of initiation in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Postopek se je začel 17. decembra 2005 z objavo obvestila o začetku postopka v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission officially advised the complainant, the other Community producer, the exporting producers, importers, users known to be concerned and representatives of the PRC of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike LRK uradno seznanila z začetkom postopka.
The complainant producer, the other Community producer, exporting producers, importers and an exporters’ association made their views known.
Proizvajalec pritožnik, drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti, proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki, in združenja izvoznikov so izrazili svoja stališča.