natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subdivision of lots into sublots depending on product and lot weight
Razdelitev lotov v sublote glede na proizvod in maso lota
No incremental samples
Št. primarnih vzorcev
Aggregate sample Weight
Masa sestavljenega vzorca
Cereals and cereal products
Žita in žitni proizvodi
Sampling procedure for cereals and cereal products for lots ≥ 50 tonnes
Metode vzorčenja za žita in žitne proizvode za lote ≥ 50 ton
On condition that the sublot can be separated physically, each lot must be subdivided into sublots following Table 1.
Če je sublot mogoče fizično ločiti, je treba vsak lot razdeliti na sublote po preglednici 1.
Taking into account that the weight of the lot is not always an exact multiple of the weight of the sublots, the weight of the sublot may exceed the mentioned weight by a maximum of 20 %.
Ob upoštevanju, da masa lota ni vedno natančen večkratnik mase sublotov, lahko masa sublota presega navedeno maso za največ 20 %.
Each sublot must be sampled separately.
Vsak sublot je treba vzorčiti ločeno.
If it is not possible to carry out the method of sampling set out in this point because of the commercial consequences resulting from damage to the lot such as packaging forms, means of transport, an alternative method of sampling may be applied provided that it is as representative as possible and is fully described and documented.
Če opisane metode vzorčenja ni mogoče izvesti zaradi posledic pri trženju, ki bi nastale zaradi poškodovanja lota, npr. zaradi oblik pakiranja, prevoznih sredstev, se lahko uporablja druga metoda vzorčenja, ki je kar najbolj reprezentativna ter v celoti opisana in dokumentirana.
Sampling procedure for cereals and cereal products for lots < 50 tonnes
Postopek za vzorčenje žit in žitnih proizvodov za lote < 50 ton
For lots of cereals and cereal products less than 50 tonnes, the sampling plan must be used with 10 to 100 incremental samples, depending on the lot weight, resulting in an aggregate sample of 1 to 10 kg.
Za lote žit pod 50 ton se uporablja načrt vzorčenja z 10 do 100 primarnih vzorcev, odvisno od mase lota, ki se združijo v sestavljeni vzorec z 1 do 10 kg.
For very small lots (≤ 0,5 tonnes) a lower number of incremental samples may be taken, but the aggregate sample uniting all incremental samples shall be also in that case at least 1 kg.
Pri zelo majhnih lotih (≤ 0,5 tone) se lahko vzame manjše število primarnih vzorcev, vendar mora sestavljeni vzorec, ki združuje vse primarne vzorce, tudi v tem primeru tehtati najmanj 1 kg.
The figures in Table 2 may be used to determine the number of incremental samples to be taken.
Za določitev števila primarnih vzorcev, ki jih je treba vzeti, se uporablja preglednica 2.
Number of incremental samples to be taken depending on the weight of the lot of cereals and cereal products
Število primarnih vzorcev, ki jih je treba vzeti, glede na maso lota žita in žitnih proizvodov
Lot weight (tonnes)
Masa lota (v tonah)
Sampling procedure for foods intended for infants and young children
Metode vzorčenja živil, namenjenih za dojenčke in majhne otroke
The sampling procedure for cereals and cereal products as set out in point 4.5 shall apply to food intended for infants and young children.
Metode vzorčenja žit in žitnih proizvodov, kot so določene v točki 4.5, se uporabljajo tudi pri živilih, namenjenih za dojenčke in majhne otroke.
Accordingly the number of incremental samples to be taken shall depend on the weight of the lot, with a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 100, in accordance with Table 2 at point 4.5.
Skladno s tem je število primarnih vzorcev, ki jih je treba vzeti, odvisno od mase lota in je najmanj 10 in največ 100, v skladu s preglednico 2 v točki 4.5.
Weight of the incremental sample must be about 100 grams.
Masa primarnega vzorca mora biti približno 100 gramov.
In the case of lots in retail packing, the weight of the incremental sample shall depend on the weight of the retail packing and in case of very small lots (≤ 0,5 tonnes) the incremental samples must have a weight as such that uniting the incremental samples results in an aggregate sample of at least 1 kg.
Če gre za lote, sestavljene iz pakiranj za prodajo na drobno, je masa primarnega vzorca odvisna od mase pakiranja za prodajo na drobno, v primeru zelo majhnih lotov (≤ 0,5 tone) morajo imeti primarni vzorci tako maso, da ob združitvi vsota mase sestavljenega vzorca znaša najmanj 1 kg.
Weight of aggregate sampling = 1-10 kg sufficiently mixed.
Masa sestavljenega vzorca = 1–10 kg, dobro premešano.
Sampling at retail stage
Vzorčenje na stopnji prodaje na drobno
Sampling of foodstuffs at the retail stage must be done where possible in accordance with the sampling provisions set out in points 4.4. and 4.5.
Vzorčenje živil na stopnji prodaje na drobno se po možnosti izvede v skladu z navedenimi določbami za vzorčenje iz točk 4.4 in 4.5.
Where that is not possible, other effective sampling procedures at retail stage may be used provided that they ensure sufficient representativeness for the sampled lot.
Če to ni mogoče, se uporabijo druge učinkovite metode vzorčenja na stopnji prodaje na drobno, če zagotavljajo zadostno reprezentativnost vzorčenega lota.
Acceptance of a lot or sublot
Sprejemljivost lota ali sublota
Acceptance if the aggregate sample conforms to the maximum limit, taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.
Sprejetje: če sestavljeni vzorec ustreza mejni vrednosti, ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti in popravka za izkoristek.
Rejection if the aggregate sample exceeds the maximum limit beyond reasonable doubt taking into account the measurement uncertainty and correction for recovery.
Zavrnitev: če sestavljeni vzorec brez utemeljenega dvoma presega mejno vrednost, ob upoštevanju merilne negotovosti in popravka za izkoristek.
Depending on the lot weight — see Table 2.
Odvisno od mase lota – glej preglednico 2.
SAMPLE PREPARATION AND CRITERIA FOR METHODS OF ANALYSIS USED IN OFFICIAL CHECKING OF THE LEVELS OF FUSARIUM TOXINS IN CERTAIN FOODSTUFFS
PRIPRAVA VZORCA IN ZAHTEVE METODE ANALIZE, KI SE UPORABLJAJO ZA URADNI NADZOR VSEBNOSTI TOKSINOV IZ RODU FUSARIUM V NEKATERIH ŽIVILIH
Precautions
Previdnostni ukrepi
As the distribution of Fusarium toxins is non-homogeneous, samples shall be prepared, and especially homogenised, with extreme care.
Ker je porazdelitev toksinov Fusarium nehomogena, je treba vzorce pripraviti in zlasti homogenizirati izredno pazljivo.
All the material received by the laboratory must be used for the preparation of test material.
Za pripravo testnega vzorca je treba uporabiti ves material, ki je prispel v laboratorij.
Treatment of the sample as received in the laboratory
Obdelava vzorca, prispelega v laboratorij
Each laboratory sample must be finely grinded and mixed thoroughly using a process that has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation.
Vsak laboratorijski vzorec se drobno zmelje in premeša po postopku, s katerim se dokazano doseže popolna homogenizacija.
In case the maximum level applies to the dry matter, the dry matter content of the product shall be determined on a part of the homogenised sample, using a procedure that has been demonstrated to determine accurately the dry matter content.
Če se mejna vrednost nanaša na suho snov, je treba določiti vsebnost suhe snovi proizvoda na delu homogeniziranega vzorca, pri tem pa se uporabi postopek, s katerim se dokazano ugotovi natančna vsebnost suhe snovi.
The replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised material unless such procedure conflicts with Member States’ rules on sampling.
Enakovredni vzorci za uradni nadzor, za potrebe nosilcev dejavnosti za pridobitev drugega mnenja in sodne namene se jemljejo iz homogenizirane snovi, če ta postopek ni v nasprotju s predpisi države članice o vzorčenju.
Method of analysis to be used by the laboratory and laboratory control requirements
Metoda analize, ki jo uporablja laboratorij, in nadzorne zahteve laboratorija
A number of the most commonly used definitions that the laboratory shall be required to use are the following:
V nadaljevanju so navedene nekatere splošne opredelitve, ki jih mora laboratorij upoštevati:
The most commonly quoted precision parameters are repeatability and reproducibility.
splošna parametra natančnosti sta ponovljivost in obnovljivost.
r Repeatability, the value below which the absolute difference between two single test results obtained under repeatability conditions, namely same sample, same operator, same apparatus, same laboratory, and short interval of time may be expected to lie within a specific probability (typically 95 %) and hence r = 2,8 × sr
r ponovljivost, vrednost manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preizkusa, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti, in sicer isti vzorec, isti izvajalec, ista naprava, isti laboratorij in kratek časovni interval, znotraj določene verjetnosti (ponavadi 95 %) in zato je r = 2,8 × sr
Standard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions
standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti
Relative standard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions sr
relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti sr
R Reproducibility, the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions, namely on identical material obtained by operators in different laboratories, using the standardised test method may be expected to lie within a certain probability (typically 95 %); R = 2,8 × sR
R obnovljivost, vrednost, manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preizkusa, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti, in sicer ista snov, ki so ga izvajalci dobili z uporabo standardizirane preskusne metode v različnih laboratorijih, znotraj določene verjetnosti (ponavadi 95 %); R = 2,8 × sR
Standard deviation, calculated from results under reproducibility conditions
standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti
Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions sR
relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti sR
Methods of analysis used for food control purposes must comply with the provisions of items 1 and 2 of the Annex to Directive 85/591/EEC.
Metode analize, uporabljene za nadzor živil, morajo biti v skladu z določbami iz točk 1 in 2 Priloge k Direktivi 85/591/EGS.
Performance Criteria
Izvedbena merila
Where no specific methods for the determination of Fusarium toxins levels in foodstuffs are required by Community legislation, laboratories may select any method provided the selected method meets the following criteria:
Kadar na ravni Skupnosti niso predpisane posebne metode za določanje ravni toksinov iz rodu Fusarium v živilih, lahko laboratoriji izberejo katero koli metodo, če izbrana metoda izpolnjuje naslednje zahteve:
Performance characteristics for deoxynivalenol
Izvedbena merila za deoksinivalenol
Level μg/kg
Vsebnost μg/kg
Recovery %
Izkoristek %
Performance characteristics for zearalenone
Izvedbena merila za zearalenon
Performance characteristics for Fumonisin B1 and B2
Izvedbena merila za fumonizina B1 in B2
Fumonisin B1 or B2
Fumonizina B1 ali B2
Performance characteristics for T-2 and HT-2 toxin
Izvedbena merila za toksinona T-2 in HT-2
The detection limits of the methods used are not stated as the precision values are given at the concentrations of interest.
Meje zaznavnosti uporabljenih metod niso navedene, ker so vrednosti za natančnost dane pri izbranih koncentracijah.
The precision values are calculated from the Horwitz equation:
Vrednosti za natančnost se izračunajo s Horwitzovo enačbo:
RSDR is the relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions sR
RSDR relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti sR
C is the concentration ratio (i.e. 1 = 100 g/100 g, 0,001 = 1000 mg/kg
C je razmerje koncentracije (tj. 1 = 100 g/100 g, 0,001 = 1000 mg/kg).
That is a generalised precision equation, which has been found to be independent of analyte and matrix but solely dependent on concentration for most routine methods of analysis.
To je posplošena enačba za natančnost, ki je neodvisna od analita in matrice ter je za vse običajne metode analize odvisna izključno od koncentracije.
‘Fitness-for-purpose’ approach
Pristop „ustreznost namenu“
In the case where there are a limited number of fully validated methods of analysis, alternatively, a ‘fitness-for-purpose’ approach, defining a single parameter, a fitness function, to evaluate the acceptability of methods of analysis may be used.
Kadar je število popolnoma validiranih metod analize omejeno, se lahko uporabi alternativen pristop, t. i. „pristop ustreznost namenu“, ki opredeli parameter, funkcijo ustreznosti, za ocenitev sprejemljivosti metod analize.
A fitness function is an uncertainty function that specifies maximum levels of uncertainty regarded as fit for purpose.
Funkcija ustreznosti je funkcija negotovosti, ki opredeli mejne vrednosti negotovosti z vidika ustreznosti svojemu namenu.
Given the limited number of methods of analysis, fully validated by a collaborative trial, especially for the determination of T-2 and HT-2 toxin, the uncertainty function approach, specifying the maximum acceptable uncertainty, may also be used to assess the suitability (the ‘fitness-for-purpose’) of the method of analysis to be used by the laboratory.
Zaradi omejenega števila metod analize, popolnoma validiranih z medlaboratorijskim primerjalnim preizkusom, predvsem za določanje toksinov T-2 in HT-2, se lahko za ocenjevanje primernosti analitskih metod („ustreznost namenu“), ki naj se uporabljajo v laboratoriju, uporabi tudi pristop funkcije negotovosti, ki določa najvišjo sprejemljivo negotovost.
The laboratory may use a method which produces results within the maximum standard uncertainty.
Laboratorij lahko uporabi metodo, ki daje rezultate v mejah najvišje standardne negotovosti.
The maximum standard uncertainty may be calculated using the following formula:
Najvišja standardna negotovost se izračuna po naslednji enačbi:
Uf is the maximum standard uncertainty (μg/kg)
Uf najvišja standardna negotovost (μg/kg),
LOD is the limit of detection of the method (μg/kg)
LOD meja zaznavnosti metode (μg/kg),
α is a constant, numeric factor to be used depending on the value of C. The values to be used are set out in Table 3
α konstanten, numerični faktor, ki se uporabi glede na vrednost C. Vrednosti, ki se uporabljajo, so določene v preglednici 3,
C is the concentration of interest (μg/kg).
C izbrana koncentracija (μg/kg).
If the analytical method provides results with uncertainty measurements less than the maximum standard uncertainty the method shall be considered being equally suitable to one which meets the performance characteristics given in point 4.3.1.
Če metoda analize daje rezultate z merilnimi negotovostmi nižjimi od najvišje standardne negotovosti, je ta metoda enako primerna kot metoda, ki izpolnjuje izvedbena merila, določena v točki 4.3.1.
Numeric values to be used for α as constant in formula set out in this point, depending on the concentration of interest
Numerične vrednosti, ki se uporabljajo za α kot konstanto v enačbi iz te točke glede na izbrano koncentracijo
Recovery calculation and reporting of results
Izračun izkoristka in poročanje rezultatov
The analytical result must be reported corrected or uncorrected for recovery.
Pri rezultatu analize je treba navesti, ali je pri izračunu upoštevan izkoristek ali ne.
The manner of reporting and the level of recovery must be reported.
Navesti je treba tudi način poročanja in vrednost izkoristka.
The analytical result corrected for recovery shall be used for checking compliance (see Annex I, point 5).
Rezultat analize z upoštevanjem izkoristka se uporabi za preverjanje skladnosti (glej Prilogo I, točka 5).
The analytical result must be reported as x +/– U whereby x is the analytical result and U is the expanded measurement uncertainty.
Rezultat analize je treba navesti kot x +/– U, kjer je x rezultat analize in U razširjena negotovost meritve.
U is the expanded uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 %.
U je razširjena negotovost z uporabo količnika zajetja 2, ki pomeni stopnjo zaupanja približno 95 %.
Laboratories must comply with Council Directive 93/99/EEC.
Laboratoriji morajo biti v skladu z določbami Direktive Sveta 93/99/EGS.
T-2 toxin
Toksin T-2
HT-2 toxin
Toksin HT-2
Directive 2005/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/39/ES
amending Council Directive 74/408/EEC relating to motor vehicles with regard to the seats, their anchorages and head restraints
o spremembi Direktive Sveta 74/408/EGS o motornih vozilih glede na sedeže, njihova pritrdišča in naslone za glavo
Research has shown that the use of safety belts and restraint systems can substantially reduce the number of fatalities and the severity of injuries in the event of an accident, even one due to rollover.
Raziskave so pokazale, da lahko v primeru nesreče, tudi s prevračanjem, uporaba varnostnih pasov in sistemov za zadrževanje potnikov prispeva k bistvenemu zmanjšanju števila smrtnih nesreč in resnosti poškodb.
Fitting them in all categories of vehicles will certainly constitute an important step forward in bringing about an increase in road safety and a consequent saving of lives.
Njihova vgradnja v vse kategorije vozil bo nedvomno predstavljala pomemben korak naprej pri zagotavljanju večje varnosti v cestnem prometu in posledično reševanje življenj.
A substantial benefit to society can be attained if all vehicles are fitted with safety belts.
Družbi lahko znatno koristi, če so vsa vozila opremljena z varnostnimi pasovi.
In its Resolution of 18 February 1986 on common measures to reduce road accidents, as part of the Community's programme for road safety [3], the European Parliament stressed the need for making the wearing of safety belts compulsory for all passengers, including children, except in public service vehicles.
Evropski parlament je v svoji Resoluciji z dne 18. februarja 1986 o skupnih ukrepih za zmanjševanje števila prometnih nesreč v okviru programa Skupnosti za varnost v cestnem prometu [3] poudaril potrebo, da postane uporaba varnostnih pasov obvezna za vse potnike, vključno z otroki, razen v javnih prevoznih sredstvih.
Therefore, a distinction has to be made between public service buses and other vehicles as regards the compulsory installation of safety belts and/or restraint systems.
Kar zadeva obvezno vgradnjo varnostnih pasov in/ali sistemov za zadrževanje potnikov, je treba torej razlikovati med javnimi avtobusi in drugimi vozili.
Pursuant to Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers [4], the Community type-approval system has only been implemented for all new vehicles of category M1 since 1 January 1998.
V skladu z Direktivo Sveta 70/156/EGS z dne 6. februarja 1970 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o homologaciji motornih in priklopnih vozil [4] je bil od 1. januarja 1998 dalje sistem homologacije v Skupnosti uporabljen samo za vsa nova vozila kategorije M1.
Consequently, only vehicles of category M1 type-approved after that date have to be fitted with seats, seat anchorages and head restraints complying with the provisions of Directive 74/408/EEC [5].
Zato morajo imeti samo vozila kategorije M1, homologirana po tem datumu, sedeže, pritrdišča sedežev in naslone za glavo, ki izpolnjujejo določbe Direktive 74/408/EGS [5].
Until the Community type-approval system is extended to all categories of vehicles, the installation of seats and seat anchorages compatible with the installation of seat belt anchorages should be required, in the interests of road safety, in vehicles belonging to categories other than M1.
Dokler se sistem homologacije v Skupnosti ne razširi na vse kategorije vozil, bi bilo treba zaradi varnosti v cestnem prometu vgradnjo sedežev in pritrdišč sedežev, ki so združljivi z vgradnjo pritrdišč varnostnih pasov, zahtevati tudi v vozilih, ki ne spadajo v kategorijo M1.
Directive 74/408/EEC already provides for all technical and administrative provisions allowing the type-approval of vehicles of categories other than M1.
Direktiva 74/408/EGS že določa vse tehnične in upravne določbe, ki omogočajo homologacijo vozil, drugih kategorij kot M1.
Therefore, the Member States do not need to introduce further provisions.
Državam članicam zato ni treba uvesti nadaljnjih določb.
Since the entry into force of Commission Directive 96/37/EC of 17 June 1996 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 74/408/EEC [6], several Member States have already made compulsory the provisions contained therein in respect of certain categories of vehicles other than M1.
Od začetka veljavnosti Direktive Komisije 96/37/ES z dne 17. junija 1996 o prilagajanju Direktive Sveta 74/408/EGS [6] tehničnemu napredku so določbe iz te direktive glede nekaterih kategorij vozil, drugih kot kategorije M1, v nekaj državah članicah že postale obvezne.
Manufacturers and their suppliers have thus developed the appropriate technology.
Proizvajalci in njihovi dobavitelji so tako razvili ustrezno tehnologijo.
Research has shown that it is not possible to provide side-facing seats with safety belts ensuring the same level of safety to the occupants as front-facing seats.
Raziskave so pokazale, da na sedeže, obrnjene vstran, ni mogoče namestiti varnostnih pasov, ki bi uporabnikom zagotavljali enako raven varnosti kakor sedeži, obrnjeni naprej.
For safety reasons, it is necessary to ban those seats in certain categories of vehicles.
Iz varnostnih razlogov je treba navedene sedeže prepovedati v nekaterih kategorijah vozil.
The provisions allowing side-facing seats with two-point belts in certain classes of vehicle of category M3 should be of a temporary nature, pending the entry into force of Community legislation recasting Directive 70/156/EEC and extending Community type-approval to all vehicles, including vehicles of category M3.
Določbe, ki v določenih kategorijah vozil M3 dovoljujejo sedeže, obrnjene vstran, opremljene z dvotočkovnimi varnostnimi pasovi, bi morale biti le prehodne narave, dokler ne začne veljati zakonodaja Skupnosti, ki prenavlja Direktivo 70/156/EGS in razširja homologacijo Skupnosti na vsa vozila, vključno z vozili kategorije M3.
Directive 74/408/EEC should be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 74/408/EGS bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely the improvement of road safety by making compulsory the fitting of safety belts in certain categories of vehicles, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer izboljšanja varnosti v cestnem prometu z uvedbo obvezne vgradnje varnostnih pasov v nekatere kategorije vozil, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker je ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa lažje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective,
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenega cilja —
Amendments to Directive 74/408/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 74/408/EGS
Directive 74/408/EEC is hereby amended as follows:
Direktiva 74/408/EGS se spremeni:
Article 1 shall be amended as follows:
člen 1 se spremeni:
the following subparagraph shall be added to paragraph 1:
v odstavku 1 se doda naslednji pododstavek: