natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where authorised uses of plant protection products do not result in detectable levels of pesticide residues in or on the food product, or where there are no authorised uses, or where uses which have been authorised by Member States have not been supported by the necessary data, or where uses in third countries resulting in residues in or on food products which may enter into circulation in the Community market have not been supported with such necessary data, MRLs should be fixed at the lower limit of analytical determination.
Kadar registrirana uporaba fitofarmacevtskih sredstev nima za posledico zaznavnih količin ostankov pesticidov v ali na živilu, ali kadar ni registrirane uporabe, ali kadar uporabe, ki so jih države članice registrirale, niso podprte s potrebnimi podatki, ali kadar uporabe v tretjih državah, ki imajo za posledico ostanke v ali na živilu, ki se lahko dajo na trg v Skupnosti, niso podprte s takimi potrebnimi podatki, morajo biti MRL določene na spodnji meji analitičnega določanja.
Therefore it is appropriate to fix new MRLs for those pesticides.
Zato je za navedene pesticide ustrezno določiti nove MRL.
The setting or modification at Community level of provisional MRLs does not prevent the Member States from establishing provisional MRLs for fenhexamid, cyazofamid, linuron, pymetrozine, and pyraclostrobin in accordance with Article 4(1)(f) of Directive 91/414/EEC and Annex VI thereto.
Določitev ali sprememba začasnih MRL na ravni Skupnosti državam članicam ne preprečuje, da uvedejo začasne MRL za fenheksamid, ciazofamid, linuron, pimetrozin in piraklostrobin v skladu s členom 4(1)(f) Direktive 91/414/EGS in Prilogo VI k Direktivi.
It is considered that a period of four years is sufficient to permit further uses of these substances.
Šteje se, da je obdobje štirih let dovolj dolgo, da se dovoli nadaljnjo uporabo teh snovi.
In Annex I to Directive 90/642/EEC in the category ‘2.
V Prilogi I k Direktivi 90/642/EGS v kategoriji „2.
Vegetables, fresh or uncooked, frozen or dry, (v) Leaf vegetables and fresh herbs, (a) Lettuce and similar’, the entries ‘leaves and stems of brassica’ and ‘ruccola’ are added between the entries ‘Scarole’ and ‘others’.
Zelenjava, sveža ali nekuhana, zamrznjena ali sušena, (v) Listna zelenjava in presna zelišča, (a) Solata in podobno“ se med vnose „Endivija“ in „Drugo“ dodata vnosa „Listi in stebla kapusnic“ in „Rukola“.
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 8 December 2006 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 8. decembra 2006.
They shall apply those provisions from 9 December 2006 except for pyraclostrobine where they shall apply the provisions from 21 April 2007.
Te predpise uporabljajo od 9. decembra 2006 razen za piraklostrobin, za katerega predpise uporabljajo od 21. aprila 2007.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Države članice se v sprejetih predpisih sklicujejo na to direktivo, ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/30/EC (OJ L 75, 14.3.2006, p. 7).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2006/30/ES (UL L 75, 14.3.2006, str. 7).
Opinion regarding questions relating to amending the annexes to Council Directives 86/362/EEC, 86/363/EEC and 90/642/EEC (Opinion expressed by the SCP, 14 July 1998); opinion regarding variable pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables (opinion expressed by SCP on 14 July 1998) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scp/outcome_ppp_en.html
Mnenje o vprašanjih v zvezi s spremembo prilog k Direktivam Sveta 86/362/EGS, 86/363/EGS in 90/642/EGS (Mnenje izrazil Znanstveni odbor za rastline dne 14. julija 1998); Mnenje o spremenljivih ostankih pesticidov na sadju in zelenjavi (Mnenje izrazil Znanstveni odbor za rastline dne 14. julija 1998). http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scp/outcome_ppp_en.html
In part A of Annex II to Directive 90/642/EEC, the columns for fenbutatin oxide, fenhexamid, cyazofamid, linuron, triadimefon/triadimenol pymetrozine, and pyraclostrobin are replaced by the following:
V delu A Priloge II k Direktivi 90/642/EGS se stolpci za fenbutatin oksid, fenheksamid, ciazofamid, linuron, triadimefon/triadimenol pimetrozin in piraklostrobin nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Triadimefon and triadimenol (sum of triadimefon and triadimenol)
Triadimefon in triadimenol (vsota triadimefona in triadimenola)
Pyraclostrobine
Piraklostrobin
CITRUS FRUIT
CITRUSI
TREE NUTS (shelled or unshelled)
LUPINARJI (oluščeni ali neoluščeni)
Wild berries and wild fruit
Gozdno jagodičje in drobno sadje
Cucurbits — edible peel
Bučnice z užitno lupino
Leaves and stems of brassica
Listi in stebla kapusnic
Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2006/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast)
o uresničevanju načela enakih možnosti ter enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri zaposlovanju in poklicnem delu (preoblikovano)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 141(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti člena 141(3) Pogodbe,
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty,
v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe,
Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions and Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes have been significantly amended.
Direktiva Sveta 76/207/EGS z dne 9. februarja 1976 o izvrševanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnega usposabljanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev in Direktiva Sveta 86/378/EGS z dne 24. julija 1986 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti sta bili bistveno spremenjeni.
Council Directive 75/117/EEC of 10 February 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the application of the principle of equal pay for men and women and Council Directive 97/80/EC of 15 December 1997 on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex also contain provisions which have as their purpose the implementation of the principle of equal treatment between men and women.
Tudi Direktiva Sveta 75/117/EGS z dne 10. februarja 1975 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z uporabo načela enakega plačila za moške in ženske in Direktiva Sveta 97/80/ES z dne 15. decembra 1997 o dokaznem bremenu v primerih diskriminacije zaradi spola vsebujeta določbe, katerih namen je uresničevanje načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk.
Now that new amendments are being made to the said Directives, it is desirable, for reasons of clarity, that the provisions in question should be recast by bringing together in a single text the main provisions existing in this field as well as certain developments arising out of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (hereinafter referred to as the Court of Justice).
Ker se te direktive spet spreminjajo, je treba zadevne določbe zaradi jasnosti in združitve temeljnih določb na tem področju preoblikovati v eno besedilo, kakor tudi da bi se upošteval razvoj, ki izhaja iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Sodišče“).
Equality between men and women is a fundamental principle of Community law under Article 2 and Article 3(2) of the Treaty and the case-law of the Court of Justice.
V skladu s členoma 2 in 3(2) Pogodbe ter sodno prakso Sodišča je enakost moških in žensk temeljno načelo prava Skupnosti.
Those Treaty provisions proclaim equality between men and women as a ‘task’ and an ‘aim’ of the Community and impose a positive obligation to promote it in all its activities.
Iz navedenih členov Pogodbe izhaja, da je načelo enakosti moških in žensk „naloga“ in „cilj“ Skupnosti, ki ji nalaga pozitivno obveznost spodbujanja tega načela pri vseh njenih dejavnostih.
The Court of Justice has held that the scope of the principle of equal treatment for men and women cannot be confined to the prohibition of discrimination based on the fact that a person is of one or other sex.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se področje uporabe načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk ne more omejiti na prepoved diskriminacije, ki temelji na dejstvu, da je oseba enega ali drugega spola.
In view of its purpose and the nature of the rights which it seeks to safeguard, it also applies to discrimination arising from the gender reassignment of a person.
Zaradi namena in narave pravic, ki naj bi jih to načelo ščitilo, se uporablja tudi za diskriminacijo, ki izhaja iz spremembe spola osebe.
Article 141(3) of the Treaty now provides a specific legal basis for the adoption of Community measures to ensure the application of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment in matters of employment and occupation, including the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value.
S členom 141(3) Pogodbe je določena posebna pravna podlaga za sprejemanje ukrepov Skupnosti za zagotovitev uporabe načela enakih možnosti in enakega obravnavanja na področju zaposlovanja in poklica, vključno z načelom enakega plačila za enako delo ali delo enake vrednosti.
Articles 21 and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union also prohibit any discrimination on grounds of sex and enshrine the right to equal treatment between men and women in all areas, including employment, work and pay.
Tudi s členoma 21 in 23 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije je prepovedana vsaka diskriminacija zaradi spola ter je zagotovljena pravica do enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk na vseh področjih, vključno z zaposlovanjem, delom in plačilom.
Harassment and sexual harassment are contrary to the principle of equal treatment between men and women and constitute discrimination on grounds of sex for the purposes of this Directive.
Nadlegovanje in spolno nadlegovanje sta v nasprotju z načelom enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk ter pomenita diskriminacijo zaradi spola za namene te direktive.
These forms of discrimination occur not only in the workplace, but also in the context of access to employment, vocational training and promotion.
Te oblike diskriminacije ne obstajajo le na delovnem mestu, temveč tudi v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve, poklicnim usposabljanjem in napredovanjem.
They should therefore be prohibited and should be subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties.
Zaradi tega bi morale biti prepovedane in zanje predvidene učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazni.
In this context, employers and those responsible for vocational training should be encouraged to take measures to combat all forms of discrimination on grounds of sex and, in particular, to take preventive measures against harassment and sexual harassment in the workplace and in access to employment, vocational training and promotion, in accordance with national law and practice.
V tem smislu je treba delodajalce in tiste, ki so odgovorni za poklicno usposabljanje, spodbuditi, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za boj proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije zaradi spola in zlasti naj v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso sprejmejo preventivne ukrepe proti nadlegovanju in spolnemu nadlegovanju na delovnem mestu ter pri dostopu do zaposlitve, poklicnem usposabljanju in napredovanju.
The principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value as laid down by Article 141 of the Treaty and consistently upheld in the case-law of the Court of Justice constitutes an important aspect of the principle of equal treatment between men and women and an essential and indispensable part of the acquis communautaire, including the case-law of the Court concerning sex discrimination.
Načelo enakega plačila za enako delo ali delo enake vrednosti, kakor je določeno v členu 141 Pogodbe in potrjeno z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča, predstavlja pomemben vidik načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk ter bistven in nepogrešljiv del pravnega reda Skupnosti, vključno s sodno prakso Sodišča na področju diskriminacije zaradi spola.
It is therefore appropriate to make further provision for its implementation.
Zaradi tega je primerno omogočiti njegovo nadaljnje uresničevanje.
In accordance with settled case-law of the Court of Justice, in order to assess whether workers are performing the same work or work of equal value, it should be determined whether, having regard to a range of factors including the nature of the work and training and working conditions, those workers may be considered to be in a comparable situation.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je za ugotovitev, ali delavci opravljajo enako delo ali delo enake vrednosti, treba določiti, ali se za te delavce ob upoštevanju vrste dejavnikov, vključno z naravo dela in usposabljanjem ter delovnimi pogoji, lahko šteje, da se nahajajo v primerljivih okoliščinah.
The Court of Justice has established that, in certain circumstances, the principle of equal pay is not limited to situations in which men and women work for the same employer.
Sodišče je odločilo, da v določenih okoliščinah načelo enakega plačila ni omejeno samo na okoliščine, v katerih moški in ženske delajo za istega delodajalca.
The Member States, in collaboration with the social partners, should continue to address the problem of the continuing gender-based wage differentials and marked gender segregation on the labour market by means such as flexible working time arrangements which enable both men and women to combine family and work commitments more successfully.
Države članice bi si morale v sodelovanju s socialnimi partnerji še naprej prizadevati za rešitev problema razlik v plači med spoloma in izrazite segregacije zaradi spola na trgu delovne sile s pomočjo ureditev o gibljivem delovnem času, ki bi moškim in ženskam omogočile uspešnejšo uskladitev družinskih in poklicnih obveznosti.
This could also include appropriate parental leave arrangements which could be taken up by either parent as well as the provision of accessible and affordable child-care facilities and care for dependent persons.
To bi lahko vključevalo tudi ustrezne ureditve o starševskem dopustu, ki bi jih lahko koristila oba starša, kot tudi zagotavljanje dostopnega in finančno ugodnega otroškega varstva ter oskrbe za vzdrževane družinske člane.
Specific measures should be adopted to ensure the implementation of the principle of equal treatment in occupational social security schemes and to define its scope more clearly.
Sprejeti je treba posebne ukrepe za zagotovitev uresničevanja načela enakega obravnavanja v poklicnih sistemih socialne varnosti in jasneje opredeliti njegovo področje uporabe.
In its judgment of 17 May 1990 in Case C-262/88, the Court of Justice determined that all forms of occupational pension constitute an element of pay within the meaning of Article 141 of the Treaty.
V sodbi z dne 17. maja 1990 v zadevi C-262/88 je Sodišče odločilo, da so vse oblike poklicnih pokojnin sestavni del plačila v smislu člena 141 Pogodbe.
Although the concept of pay within the meaning of Article 141 of the Treaty does not encompass social security benefits, it is now clearly established that a pension scheme for public servants falls within the scope of the principle of equal pay if the benefits payable under the scheme are paid to the worker by reason of his/her employment relationship with the public employer, notwithstanding the fact that such scheme forms part of a general statutory scheme.
Čeprav pojem plačila v smislu člena 141 Pogodbe ne vključuje prejemkov za socialno varnost, je zdaj jasno opredeljeno, da spada pokojninska shema za javne uslužbence v okvir načela enakega plačila, če se prejemki iz sheme izplačujejo delavcu na podlagi delovnega razmerja z delodajalcem javnega sektorja, ne glede na dejstvo, da je taka shema del splošnega zakonsko predpisanega sistema.
According to the judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases C-7/93 and C-351/00, that condition will be satisfied if the pension scheme concerns a particular category of workers and its benefits are directly related to the period of service and calculated by reference to the public servant's final salary.
V skladu s sodbami Sodišča v zadevah C-7/93 in C-351/00 je ta pogoj izpolnjen, če se pokojninska shema nanaša na posebno kategorijo delavcev in so prejemki na podlagi pravic iz sheme neposredno povezani z delovno dobo ter se izračunavajo na podlagi zadnje plače javnega uslužbenca.
For reasons of clarity, it is therefore appropriate to make specific provision to that effect.
Zaradi jasnosti je torej primerno, da se s tem v zvezi sprejme posebna določba.
The Court of Justice has confirmed that whilst the contributions of male and female workers to a defined-benefit pension scheme are covered by Article 141 of the Treaty, any inequality in employers' contributions paid under funded defined-benefit schemes which is due to the use of actuarial factors differing according to sex is not to be assessed in the light of that same provision.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da so prispevki zaposlenih moških in žensk v pokojninsko shemo z vnaprej določenimi prejemki zajeti s členom 141 Pogodbe, vendar prispevkov, ki niso enaki in jih delodajalci plačujejo v naložbene pokojninske sheme z vnaprej določenimi prejemki zaradi uporabe aktuarskih faktorjev, ki se razlikujejo glede na spol, ni mogoče ocenjevati v okviru iste določbe.
By way of example, in the case of funded defined‐benefit schemes, certain elements, such as conversion into a capital sum of part of a periodic pension, transfer of pension rights, a reversionary pension payable to a dependant in return for the surrender of part of a pension or a reduced pension where the worker opts to take earlier retirement, may be unequal where the inequality of the amounts results from the effects of the use of actuarial factors differing according to sex at the time when the scheme's funding is implemented.
Tako so lahko na primer pri naložbenih pokojninskih shemah z vnaprej določenimi prejemki nekateri elementi, kot so pretvorba dela redne pokojnine v kapital, prenos pokojninskih pravic, pokojnina za preživele družinske člane, izplačljiva vzdrževancu v zameno za odstop dela pokojnine, ali znižana pokojnina, kadar se delavec odloči za predčasno upokojitev, neenaki, kadar ob izvajanju financiranja sheme različni zneski izhajajo iz uporabe aktuarskih faktorjev glede na spol.
It is well established that benefits payable under occupational social security schemes are not to be considered as remuneration insofar as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who initiated legal proceedings or brought an equivalent claim under the applicable national law before that date.
Ugotovljeno je, da se dajatve, ki se plačujejo na podlagi poklicnih sistemov socialne varnosti, ne štejejo za prejemke iz dela, če se nanašajo na zaposlitve pred 17. majem 1990, razen če so delavci ali osebe, ki jih zahtevajo, začele sodni postopek ali vložile podobno zahtevo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki se je uporabljala pred tem datumom.
It is therefore necessary to limit the implementation of the principle of equal treatment accordingly.
Zato je treba uresničevanje načela enakega obravnavanja ustrezno omejiti.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that the Barber Protocol does not affect the right to join an occupational pension scheme and that the limitation of the effects in time of the judgment in Case C-262/88 does not apply to the right to join an occupational pension scheme.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča Barberjev protokol ne vpliva na pravico do vključitve v poklicno pokojninsko shemo in se časovna omejitev učinkov sodbe v zadevi C-262/88 ne uporablja za pravico do vključitve v poklicno pokojninsko shemo.
The Court of Justice also ruled that the national rules relating to time limits for bringing actions under national law may be relied on against workers who assert their right to join an occupational pension scheme, provided that they are not less favourable for that type of action than for similar actions of a domestic nature and that they do not render the exercise of rights conferred by Community law impossible in practice.
Sodišče je tudi razsodilo, da se lahko za delavce, ki uveljavljajo pravico do vključitve v poklicno pokojninsko shemo, uporabijo nacionalni predpisi glede rokov za začetek postopkov po nacionalni zakonodaji, pod pogojem, da za tovrstne postopke niso manj ugodni kot za podobne domače postopke in da v praksi ne onemogočajo uveljavljanja pravic, dodeljenih s pravom Skupnosti.
The Court of Justice has also pointed out that the fact that a worker can claim retroactively to join an occupational pension scheme does not allow the worker to avoid paying the contributions relating to the period of membership concerned.
Sodišče je prav tako izpostavilo dejstvo, da lahko delavci retroaktivno zahtevajo vključitev v poklicno pokojninsko shemo, vendar jim s tem ni dovoljeno, da bi se izognili plačilu prispevkov za zadevno obdobje članstva.
Ensuring equal access to employment and the vocational training leading thereto is fundamental to the application of the principle of equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation.
Zagotavljanje enakega dostopa do zaposlitve in poklicnega usposabljanja zaradi zaposlitve je temelj uresničevanja načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk na področju zaposlovanja in poklicnega dela.
Any exception to this principle should therefore be limited to those occupational activities which necessitate the employment of a person of a particular sex by reason of their nature or the context in which they are carried out, provided that the objective sought is legitimate and complies with the principle of proportionality.
Izjeme v zvezi s tem načelom morajo biti zato omejene na tiste poklicne dejavnosti, ki zahtevajo zaposlitev osebe določenega spola zaradi narave dejavnosti ali okoliščin, v katerih se dejavnosti izvajajo, pod pogojem, da je zadani cilj zakonit in skladen z načelom sorazmernosti.
This Directive does not prejudice freedom of association, including the right to establish unions with others and to join unions to defend one's interests.
Ta direktiva ne posega v svobodo združevanja, vključno s pravico vsake osebe, da za zaščito svojih interesov ustanavlja sindikate in se v njih včlani.
Measures within the meaning of Article 141(4) of the Treaty may include membership or the continuation of the activity of organisations or unions whose main objective is the promotion, in practice, of the principle of equal treatment between men and women.
Ukrepi v smislu člena 141(4) Pogodbe lahko vključujejo članstvo ali nadaljevanje dejavnosti organizacij ali sindikatov, katerih glavni cilj je uveljavljanje načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk v praksi.
The prohibition of discrimination should be without prejudice to the maintenance or adoption of measures intended to prevent or compensate for disadvantages suffered by a group of persons of one sex.
Prepoved diskriminacije ne sme posegati v ohranjanje ali sprejemanje ukrepov, namenjenih preprečevanju ali nadomestilu za prikrajšanost skupine oseb istega spola.
Such measures permit organisations of persons of one sex where their main object is the promotion of the special needs of those persons and the promotion of equality between men and women.
Takšni ukrepi dovoljujejo organizacije oseb enega spola, kadar je njihov glavni cilj spodbujanje posebnih potreb teh oseb in spodbujanje enakosti moških in žensk.