natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For example, retrofitting of diesel vehicles with particulate filter could lead to higher emission reductions than those estimated by the Dutch authorities, if the budget allocated to this measure was increased and if particulate filters were installed in particular in vehicles with a high urban mileage (e.g. taxis).
Dodatno opremljanje dizelskih vozil s filtri za delce bi na primer omogočilo večje zmanjšanje emisij od ocen nizozemskih organov, če bi se povečala dodelitev proračunskih sredstev za ta ukrep in če bi se filtri za trdne delce namestili zlasti v tista vozila, ki opravljajo veliko voženj v mestnih območjih (na primer taksiji).
The costs of retrofitting ships with diesel particulate filters are estimated by the Dutch authorities to be lower than other retrofitting measures (in a range of EUR 10 to EUR 60 per kg of particulate matter reduction [13]) and would be lower than the health costs associated with particulate matter concentrations, as calculated by the Dutch authorities (i.e. EUR 340 per kg in urban environment and EUR 80 per kg in rural environment).
Nizozemski organi ocenjujejo, da so stroški dodatnega opremljanja ladij z dizelskimi filtri za delce nižji od drugih ukrepov glede dodatnega opremljanja (med 10 EUR in 60 EUR na kg zmanjšanja emisij trdnih delcev [13]) in po njihovih izračunih nižji od stroškov zdravstva v zvezi s koncentracijami trdnih delcev (tj. 340 EUR na kg v mestih in 80 EUR na kg podeželju).
It should be noted in this regard that, according to the projections from the RAINS models, while the relative importance of particulate emissions from light-duty vehicles will decrease in the next years, the importance of the emissions from inland shipping and maritime transport is going to increase.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da se bo v skladu s pojekcijami modelov RAINS pomembnost emisij trdnih delcev iz ladijskega prometa po notranjih plovnih poteh ter pomorskega prometa v naslednjih letih povečala, medtem ko se bo relativna pomembnost emisij trdnih delcev iz lahkih vozil zmanjšala.
The Dutch authorities could also consider an earlier implementation of some of the ‘soft measures’ included in the Budget Day measures falling under the competence of the Dutch government.
Nizozemski organi bi lahko razmislili tudi o predčasni izvedbi nekaterih „mehkih ukrepov“, ki so vključeni v ukrepe na dan predložitve proračuna in ki so v pristojnosti nizozemske vlade.
In this context, it is noted that the estimated particulate matter reduction potential of the total package of ‘soft measures’ of the Budget day proposal is higher than that of the ‘hard measures’.
V zvezi s tem se opozarja, da je verjetnost glede zmanjšanja emisij trdnih delcev v okviru paketa „mehkih ukrepov“ na dan predložitve proračuna večja od tiste v okviru „trdih ukrepov“.
This measure would probably have a bigger effect on less populated areas than in the cities.
Ta ukrep bi imel najbrž večji učinek na manj naseljena območja kot v mestih.
However, given the expected order of magnitude of reduction of the background concentration of particulate matter, and its favourable effect in terms of the protection of public health, it would probably be worth considering earlier implementation.
Kljub temu bi bilo glede na predvideni obseg osnovnega zmanjšanja koncentracij trdnih delcev in njegovih ugodnih učinkov glede varovanja javnega zdravja dobro razmisliti o predčasni izvedbi.
The Commission considers that the information provided by the Dutch authorities clearly indicate that less restrictive measures than the notified measure could be taken by the Dutch authorities to reach the stated objectives of environment and health protection.
Komisija meni, da informacije, ki so jih zagotovili nizozemski organi, jasno kažejo, da lahko nizozemski organi sprejmejo manj omejevalne ukrepe od priglašenega, da bi dosegli zastavljene cilje v zvezi z varstvom okolja in varovanjem zdravja.
While the notified measure would constitute a breach of the EC type-approval system for vehicles, the alternative measures would not, in principle, imply a derogation to existing EC harmonisation measures.
Medtem ko bi priglašeni ukrep kršil sistem ES-homologacije vozil, alternativni ukrepi načeloma ne bi pomenili odstopanja od veljavnih usklajevalnih ukrepov ES.
The reasons why such measures have not been finally proposed, even though contemplated by the Dutch authorities and despite the fact that they could yield at least the same amount of particulate matter reduction than the notified measure, do not clearly emerge from the documents submitted by the Netherlands.
Iz dokumentov, ki jih je predložila Nizozemska, niso jasno razvidni razlogi, zakaj takšni ukrepi nazadnje niso bili predlagani, čeprav so nizozemski organi o njih razmišljali in čeprav bi omogočili vsaj enako zmanjšanje emisij trdnih delcev kot priglašeni ukrep.
The Commission would like to stress in this respect that among the different options capable of reaching the pursued objective of health and environmental protection, Member States are obliged to choose those which are less disruptive to the internal market.
V zvezi s tem bi Komisija rada poudarila, da mora država članica med različnimi rešitvami za dosego zastavljenega cilja v zvezi z varstvom okolja in varovanjem zdravja izbrati tiste, ki so manj moteče za notranji trg.
In conclusion, the Commission believes that there is evidence indicating that the envisaged national measure is not the least restrictive measure to achieve the stated aim of environmental and health protection and that, once adopted, it will constitute a disproportionate obstacle to the functioning of the internal market.
V sklepni ugotovitvi Komisija verjame, da obstajajo dokazi, ki kažejo, da načrtovani nacionalni ukrep ni najmanj omejevalen ukrep za dosego navedenega cilja v zvezi z varstvom okolja in varovanjem zdravja in da bo, če bo sprejet, pomenil nesorazmerno oviro za delovanje notranjega trga.
International context
Mednarodni vidiki
The Commission would like to set out some considerations about the international context of the envisaged measure.
Komisija bi želela izpostaviti nekaj razmislekov glede mednarodnega vidika načrtovanega ukrepa.
By Council 97/836/EC Decision of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement’) [14], the European Community acceded to UN/ECE Regulation 83 [15] adopted under the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions ( ‘Revised 1958 Agreement’).
Evropska skupnost je s Sklepom Sveta 97/836/ES z dne 27. novembra 1997 v pričakovanju pristopa Evropske skupnosti k Sporazumu Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o sprejetju enotnih tehničnih predpisov za cestna vozila, opremo in dele, ki se lahko vgradijo v cestna vozila in/ali uporabijo na njih, in o pogojih za vzajemno priznanje homologacij, dodeljenih na podlagi teh predpisov („Revidiran sporazum iz leta 1958“) [14] pristopila k Pravilniku UN/ECE št. 83 [15], sprejetim v skladu s Sporazumom Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo o sprejetju enotnih tehničnih predpisov za cestna vozila, opremo in dele, ki se lahko vgradijo v cestna vozila in/ali uporabijo na njih, in o pogojih za vzajemno priznanje homologacij, dodeljenih na podlagi teh predpisov ( „Revidiran sporazum iz leta 1958“).
This Regulation sets the same emission limit values and has the same scope of application as Directive 70/220/EC, as lastly amended by Directive 98/69/EC.
Ta pravilnik določa enake mejne vrednosti emisij in ima enako področje uporabe kot Direktiva 70/220/ES, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 98/69/ES.
According to Article 3 of the 1958 Agreement, ‘Wheeled vehicles, equipment or parts for which type approvals have been issued by a Contracting Party in accordance with Article 2 of this Agreement and manufactured either in the territory of a Contracting Party applying the Regulation concerned, or in such other country as is designated by the Contracting Party which has duly approved the types of wheeled vehicles, equipment or parts concerned shall be held to be in conformity with the legislation of all the Contracting Parties applying the said Regulation through type-approval’.
V skladu s členom 3 Sporazuma iz leta 1958: „cestna vozila, oprema ali deli, za katere je pogodbenica izdala homologacije v skladu s členom 2 tega sporazuma in ki so izdelani na ozemlju pogodbenice, ki uporablja zadevni predpis, ali v drugi državi, ki jo določi pogodbenica, ki je opravila ustrezno homologacijo za zadevne tipe cestnih vozil, opreme in delov, veljajo za skladne z zakonodajo vseh pogodbenic, ki uporabljajo navedeni predpis v okviru homologacij“.
The measure notified by the Dutch authorities does not contain any provision allowing the use of vehicles for which type-approvals have been issued in accordance with UN/ECE Regulation 83.
Ukrep, o katerem so nizozemski organi poslali uradno obvestilo, ne vsebuje nobene določbe, ki omogoča uporabo vozil, za katere so bile izdane homologacije v skladu s Pravilnikom UN/ECE št. 83.
Thus, the measure would prevent vehicles from other Contracting Parties that fulfil the requirements of Regulation 83 from entering the Dutch market.
Tako bi ta ukrep vozilom drugih pogodbenic, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve iz Pravilnika 83, preprečil dostop na nizozemski trg.
If adopted, the measure would therefore constitute an infringement of the 1958 Agreement.
Zato bi ukrep, če bi bil sprejet, kršil Sporazum iz leta 1958.
Following the case-law of the Court of Justice, Community law has to be interpreted, as far as possible, in conformity with the Community’s international obligations.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča se mora zakonodaja Skupnosti čim bolj razlagati glede na njene mednarodne obveznosti.
Thus, the Commission needs to ensure that the Community fulfils its obligations under the 1958 Agreement.
Zato mora Komisija zagotoviti, da Skupnost izpolni svoje obveznosti iz Sporazuma iz leta 1958.
This implies that the Netherlands has to comply with UN/ECE Regulation 83.
To pomeni, da mora Nizozemska izpolniti zahteve iz Pravilnika UN/ECE št. 83.
Failure to do so could undermine the recognition of EU type-approvals by the other Contracting Parties and would thus have clearly disproportionate repercussions on the EC’s vehicle exports to those countries.
V nasprotnem primeru bi lahko druge pogodbenice priznanje homologacij EU postavile pod vprašaj, kar bi imelo jasne nesorazmerne posledice na izvoz vozil iz ES v te države.
In light of the elements which it had available to assess the merits of the justifications put forward for the national measures notified, and in light of the considerations set out above, the Commission considers that the request of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for introducing national provisions derogating from Directive 98/69/EC, submitted on 2 November 2005:
Glede na elemente, ki so bili na voljo za presojo utemeljenosti razlogov, predloženih za priglašene ukrepe, in na podlagi zgoraj navedenih premislekov Komisija meni, da zahtevek z dne 2. novembra 2005 za uvedbo nacionalnih določb, ki odstopajo od Direktive 98/69/ES:
is admissible,
je sprejemljiv,
does not fulfil all the conditions set out in Article 95 of the EC Treaty.
ne izpolnjuje vseh pogojev iz člena 95 Pogodbe ES.
The Netherlands has failed to prove the existence of a specific problem with regard to Directive 98/69/EC.
Nizozemska ni uspela dokazati prisotnosti specifičnega problema v zvezi z Direktivo 98/69/ES.
Even if it was admitted that the Netherlands has proved the existence of a specific problem with regard to Directive 98/69/EC the Commission considers that the notified measure is not proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Tudi če bi se ugotovilo, da je Nizozemska uspela dokazati prisotnost specifičnega problema v zvezi z Direktivo 98/69/ES, Komisija meni, da priglašeni ukrep ni sorazmeren z zastavljenimi cilji.
The Commission therefore has grounds to consider that the national provisions notified cannot be approved in accordance with Article 95 (6) of the EC Treaty,
Komisija ima zato utemeljene razloge, da ne more odobriti priglašenih nacionalnih določb v skladu s členom 95(6) Pogodbe ES –
The national provisions imposing a mandatory limit value for the emissions of particulate matter of 5 mg per kilometre on commercial vehicles with a maximum permissible weight of 1305 kg (N1 vehicles, class I) and passenger cars (M1 vehicles) notified by the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 95(5) of the EC Treaty are rejected.
Nacionalne določbe o uvedbi obvezne mejne vrednosti emisij trdnih delcev, in sicer 5 miligramov na kilometer za gospodarska vozila z največjo dovoljeno maso 1305 kg (vozila N1, razred I) in osebna vozila (vozila M1), o katerih je Kraljevina Nizozemska poslala uradno obvestilo na podlagi člena 95(5) Pogodbe ES, se zavrnejo.
Done at Brussels, 3 May 2006.
V Bruslju, 3. maja 2006
COM(2005) 683 final.
COM(2005) 683 konč.
OJ C 12, 18.1.2006, p. 5.
UL C 12, 18.1.2006, str. 5.
TNO report, 06.OR.VM.013.1/IJR ‘Evaluation of the Dutch request for derogation to Directive 98/69/EC’, March 27, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the TNO report).
Poročilo TNO, 06.OR.VM.013.1/IJR „Ocena zahtevka Nizozemske za odstopanje od Direktive 98/69/ES“, 27. marec 2006 (v nadaljevanju Poročilo TNO).
‘Health aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide’, Report on a WHO Working Group, 2003.
„Health aspects of Air Pollution with Particulate Matter, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide“, poročilo o delovni skupini Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije, 2003.
Meta-analysis of time-series studies and panel studies of Particulate matter (PM) and Ozone (O3), WHO Regional office for Europe, 2004.
„Meta-analysis of time-series studies and panel studies of Particulate matter (PM) and Ozone (O3)“, Regionalna pisarna Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije za Evropo, 2004.
See TNO report, p. 5.
Glej Poročilo TNO, str. 5.
See TNO report, p. 31.
Glej Poročilo TNO, str. 31.
See TNO report, p. 38.
Glej Poročilo TNO, str. 38.
See TNO report, p. 41.
Glej Poročilo TNO, str. 41.
UN/ECE Regulation 83 on ‘Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emission of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements’.
Pravilnik UN/ECE št. 83 o „Enotnih predpisih o homologaciji vozil v zvezi z emisijami okolju škodljivih snovi glede zahtev za gorivo“.
In particular, according to the estimation from the Dutch authorities, the introduction of combined ‘air washing systems’ in intensive stock farming would yield a particulate matter reduction in 2010 of 4.4 kt.
V skladu z ocenami nizozemskih organov bi zlasti uvedba kombiniranega „čiščenja zraka“ v intenzivni živinoreji omogočila zmanjšanje emisij trdnih delcev za 4,4 kt leta 2010.
This reduction is considerably higher than the expected particulate matter reduction which would be generated by the implementation of the notified measure (0,05 kt, see section 55 above).
To zmanjšanje je znatno večje od predvidenega zmanjšanja emisij trdnih delcev, ki bi nastalo z izvajanjem priglašenega ukrepa (0,05 kt, glej oddelek 55 zgoraj).
First, they argue that the Netherlands has been experiencing difficulties for around one and a half years in complying with Directive 99/30/EC. Secondly, they note that the number of diesel cars has risen in the Netherlands due to higher petrol prices, the wider availability of diesel car models, and the greatly improved performance and fuel efficiency of diesel engines. Such an increase in the share of diesel cars was not expected when Directive 98/69/EC was adopted.
Ko je bila Direktiva 99/69/ES sprejeta, ni bilo pričakovati takšnega povečanja deleža dizelskih avtomobilov.
on the allocation of import quotas for controlled substances for the period 1 January to 31 December 2006 under Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o dodelitvi uvoznih kvot za nadzorovane snovi za obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2006 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2006) 1819)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1819)
(Only the Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Slovenian and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v nizozemskem, angleškem, francoskem, nemškem, grškem, italijanskem, poljskem, slovenskem in španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council on ‘Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer’ [1], and in particular to Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta „o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč“ [1], in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
The quantitative limits for the placing on the market in the Community of controlled substances are set out in Article 4 and Annex III of the Regulation.
Količinske omejitve za dajanje nadzorovanih snovi v promet v Skupnosti so določene v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 in Prilogi III k Uredbi.
Article 4(2)(i)(d) prohibits each producer and importer placing any methyl bromide on the market or using any for their own account after 31 December 2004.
Člen 4(2)(i)(d) prepoveduje vsem proizvajalcem in uvoznikom, da dajejo metil bromid v promet ali ga uporabljajo za lastne potrebe po 31. decembru 2004.
The quantity of methyl bromide licensed for critical uses for the period 1 January to 31 December 2006 will be published in a separate Commission decision.
Količina metil bromida, dovoljenega za nujne uporabe za obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2006, se objavi v ločeni odločbi Komisije.
The amount of methyl bromide that can be imported or produced for these purposes in 2006 must not exceed the average of the calculated level of methyl bromide which a producer or importer placed on the market or used for its own account for QPS in the years 1996, 1997 and 1998.
Količina metil bromida, ki se lahko uvozi ali proizvede za te namene v letu 2006, ne sme presegati povprečja obračunske ravni metil bromida, ki ga je proizvajalec ali uvoznik dal v promet ali uporabljal pri karantenskih ukrepih in predtovornih opravilih v letih 1996, 1997 in 1998.
Article 4(4)(i) allows a derogation from Article 4(2) if methyl bromide is imported for destruction or if it is imported for feedstock use.
Člen 4(4)(i) dovoljuje odstopanje od člena 4(2), če se metil bromid uvaža za uničenje ali za surovine.
Article 4(3)(i)(e) sets out the total calculated level of hydrochlorofluorocarbons which producers and importers may place on the market or use for their own account in the period 1 January to 31 December 2006.
Člen 4(3)(i)(e) določa skupno obračunsko raven delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov, ki jih proizvajalci in uvozniki smejo dati v promet ali uporabljati za lastne potrebe v obdobju od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2006.
The Commission has published a notice to importers in the Community of controlled substances that deplete the ozone layer [2] and has thereby received declarations on intended imports in 2006.
Komisija je objavila obvestilo za uvoznike nadzorovanih snovi, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč [2], v Skupnost in tako prejela izjave o nameravanem uvozu v letu 2006.
For hydrochlorofluorocarbons the allocation of quotas to producers and importers is in accordance with the provisions of Commission Decision 2005/103/EC of 5 February 2005 determining a mechanism for the allocation of quotas to producers and importers for hydrochlorofluorocarbons for the years 2003 to 2009 under Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 [3].
Za delno halogenirane klorofluoroogljikovodike je dodelitev kvot proizvajalcem in uvoznikom skladna z določbami Odločbe Komisije 2005/103/ES z dne 5. februarja 2005 o določitvi mehanizma za dodelitev kvot proizvajalcem in uvoznikom delno halogeniranih klorofluoroogljikovodikov za leta od 2003 do 2009 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000 [3].
For the purpose of ensuring that operators and companies benefit from allocated import quotas in due time and thereby ensure the necessary continuity of their operations, it is appropriate that the present Decision shall apply from 1 January 2006.
Da lahko izvajalci in podjetja še naprej pravočasno koristijo uvozne kvote in tako zagotovijo potrebno kontinuiteto svojega poslovanja, je primerno, da se ta odločba uporablja od 1. januarja 2006.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so skladni z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 18(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2037/2000 –
The quantity of controlled substances of group I (chlorofluorocarbons 11, 12, 113, 114 and 115) and group II (other fully halogenated chlorofluorocarbons) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 which may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community shall be 6140000 ozone depleting potential (ODP) kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine I (klorofluoroogljikovodiki 11, 12, 113, 114 in 115) in skupine II (drugi popolnoma halogenirani klorofluoroogljikovodiki) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti, je 6140000 kilogramov ODP (dejavnik škodljivosti za ozon).
The quantity of controlled substances of group III (halons) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 that may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community shall be 9211000 ODP kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine III (haloni) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti, je 9211000 kilogramov ODP.
The quantity of controlled substances of group IV (carbon tetrachloride) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 that may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community shall be 12099230 ODP kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine IV (ogljikov tetraklorid) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti, je 12099230 kilogramov ODP.
The quantity of controlled substances of group V (1,1,1-trichloroethane) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 that may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community shall be 400060 ODP kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine V (1,1,1-trikloretan), za katere velja Uredba (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti, je 400060 kilogramov ODP.
The quantity of controlled substances of group VI (methyl bromide) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 which may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community for quarantine and pre-shipment uses shall be 502606 ODP kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine VI (metil bromid), za katere velja Uredba (ES) št. 2037/2000, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti za karantenske ukrepe in predtovorna opravila, je 502606 kilogramov ODP.
The quantity of controlled substances of group VI (methyl bromide) subject to Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000 for feedstock and destruction which may be released for free circulation in the Community in 2006 from sources outside the Community shall be 1503720 ODP kilograms.
Količina nadzorovanih snovi skupine VI (metil bromid), za katere velja Uredba (ES) št. 2037/2000 in se uporabljajo za surovine in za uničenje, ki se sme v letu 2006 sprostiti v prosti promet v Skupnosti iz virov zunaj Skupnosti, je 1503720 kilogramov ODP.