natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Even the 90000 tonnes of spare capacity estimated by the Commission make it likely that Indonesian producers, which already have commercial contacts in the Community for sales of polyester filament, will significantly increase their exports to the Community once the measures are repealed.
Celo v primeru 90000 neizkoriščenih zmogljivosti, ki jih predvideva Komisija, je možno, da bodo indonezijski proizvajalci, ki v Skupnosti že imajo gospodarske stike za prodajo poliestrskih filamentov, v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov znatno povečali obseg svojega izvoza v Skupnost.
As their margins on exports to third countries are still above de minimis levels, imports originating in Indonesia would be made at injurious dumped prices.
Ker so njihove stopnje dampinga pri izvozu v tretje države še vedno višje od de minimis, bi uvoz s poreklom iz Indonezije potekal po škodljivih dampinških cenah.
CIRFS and certain Community producers noted that dumping margins of 10 % to 15 % on exports of Thai cooperating producers to third countries, significant spare capacity and the fact that Thai PSF producers are already exporting polyester textile filament to the Community clearly indicate a likelihood of a rapid recurrence of dumping on imports originating in Thailand should measures be repealed.
CIRFS in nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti so opozorili, da stopnje dampinga pri izvozu sodelujočih tajskih proizvajalcev v tretje države, ki znašajo od 10 do 15 %, znatne neizkoriščene zmogljivosti in dejstvo, da tajski proizvajalci RVP v Skupnost že izvažajo poliestrske filamente, jasno kažejo, da v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov v bližnji prihodnosti obstaja verjetnost ponovnega pojava dampinga pri uvozu s poreklom iz Tajske.
They also claimed that countries such as China, India and Vietnam, which were until recently net importers of PSF and important export markets for the countries concerned, have built up capacity to an extent that they will be soon net exporters, thus putting further pressure on the countries concerned to resume exports of significant quantities to the Community at injurious dumped prices.
Trdili so tudi, da so države, kot so Kitajska, Indija in Vietnam, ki so bile do nedavnega neto uvoznice RVP in pomembni izvozni trgi za zadevne države, vzpostavile zmogljivosti v takem obsegu, da bodo kmalu postale neto izvoznice in tako zadevne države prisilile, da začnejo ponovno izvažati znatne količine RVP v Skupnost po škodljivih dampinških cenah.
Finally, a Community producer stressed the strategic importance of upstream recycling industries, which could be negatively affected by the downsizing or even closure of Community producers of PSF.
Nenazadnje je proizvajalec Skupnosti poudaril strateški pomen reciklažne industrije, na katero lahko zmanjšanje števila proizvajalcev RVP v Skupnosti ali celo zaprtje njihovih obratov vpliva negativno.
In an expiry review, the findings on likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury are prospective and, therefore, include an element of appreciation.
V pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa so ugotovitve o verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode opravljene na podlagi možnega prihodnjega razvoja in zato vključujejo element presoje.
Overall, the facts concerning capacity and capacity utilisation in the countries concerned as established in the investigation were not challenged.
Dejstva v zvezi z zmogljivostjo in izkoriščenostjo zmogljivosti v zadevnih državah, ugotovljena v okviru preiskave, se na splošno niso izpodbijala.
CIRFS and certain Community producers have simply made a different forecast on the likelihood of recurrence of dumped PSF exports to the Community for the countries concerned.
CIRFS in nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti so preprosto prišli do drugačnih sklepov v zvezi z verjetnostjo ponovnega pojava dampinškega izvoza RVP iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost.
It has tried to support its forecast by references to products other than PSF.
Svoje sklepe so skušali podpreti tako, da so poleg RVP navedli druge izdelke.
However, the fact that certain producers in the countries concerned may export other products to the Community does not show by itself that there is a likelihood of resumption of significant quantities of dumped exports of PSF to the Community should measures be repealed.
Vendar pa dejstvo, da lahko nekateri proizvajalci v zadevnih državah v Skupnost izvažajo druge izdelke, samo po sebi ni dokaz, da v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov obstaja verjetnost ponovnega pojava znatnega dampinškega uvoza RVP v Skupnost.
In the current case, the fact that the price difference between exports from India, Indonesia and Thailand to third countries and their domestic sales in the RIP was found significantly lower than that established in the original investigations on their exports to the Community is an indication that the price situation in the markets has changed.
V sedanjem primeru je dejstvo, da je bila ugotovljena razlika v cenah pri izvozu iz Indije, Indonezije in Tajske v tretje države in v cenah pri njihovi domači prodaji med OPP znatno manjša, od razlike, ugotovljene v prvotnih preiskavah v zvezi z njihovim izvozom v Skupnost, dokaz, da se je položaj cen na trgih spremenil.
Furthermore, the fact that prices in the Community are significantly higher than prices for sales to third countries indicates that such price differences may even be lower, if not negative, if significant exports to the Community from these three countries were to resume.
Dejstvo, da so cene v Skupnosti znatno višje od prodajnih cen v tretjih državah, poleg tega kaže, da bi bile lahko te razlike v cenah celo manjše ali negativne, če bi se ponovno začelo izvažati v znatnem obsegu iz teh treh držav v Skupnost.
Thus, under the current circumstances it is not expected that dumping could take place on exports to the Community from these countries.
Zato se v trenutnih okoliščinah ne pričakuje, da bi lahko pri izvozu iz teh držav v Skupnost prišlo do dampinga.
It is recalled that there were no exports from Australia whatsoever in the RIP and, thus, such assertions cannot be made for this country.
Opozoriti je treba, da med OPP sploh ni bilo izvoza iz Avstralije, zato takih sklepov za to državo ni mogoče sprejeti.
Furthermore, the capacity utilisation in India, Indonesia and Thailand was generally high and their domestic markets important and in some cases growing fast.
Poleg tega je bil obseg izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti v Indiji, Indoneziji in na Tajskem na splošno velik, njihovi domači trgi pa pomembni in v nekaterih primerih celo hitro rastoči.
In India, 90 % of the sales of the cooperating producers were made on the domestic market in the RIP.
V Indiji je bilo v OPP 90 % prodaje sodelujočih proizvajalcev opravljenih na domačem trgu.
In Indonesia, the same ratio was 80 %.
V Indoneziji je v istem primeru delež prodaje 80 %.
In Thailand, where this ratio was around 40 %, the estimated spare capacity was rather low and in any event significantly lower than that in India and Indonesia.
Na Tajskem je bil delež prodaje približno 40 %, obseg predvidenih presežnih zmogljivosti je bil razmeroma majhen, v vsakem primeru pa znatno nižji kot v Indiji in Indoneziji.
No evidence was submitted that the situation of non-cooperating producers in these countries was different.
Predloženih ni bilo nobenih dokazov, da je bil položaj nesodelujočih proizvajalcev v teh državah drugačen.
As far as Australia is concerned, there are no indications that the old capacity of the sole producer could be easily reinstalled and used to resume exports to the Community should measures be repealed.
Kar zadeva Avstralijo, ni videti, da bi se lahko v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov prejšnje zmogljivosti edinega proizvajalca zlahka ponovno vzpostavile in uporabile za ponovni izvoz v Skupnost.
As already indicated, the existing capacity in Australia, even if it is to be used completely for exports to the Community, could not reach a share above the de minimis threshold of 1 % of the Community market.
Kot je bilo že navedeno, obstoječe zmogljivosti v Avstraliji, tudi če bi se v celoti porabile za izvoz v Skupnost, ne bi mogle doseči višjega deleža od de minimis praga v višini 1 % trga Skupnosti.
It is, thus, considered that there are no indications that spare capacities could be used to resume significant exports to the Community should measures be repealed.
Zato se sklepa, da ni znakov, da bi se lahko v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov neizkoriščene zmogljivosti porabile za ponovni izvoz v Skupnost v znatnih količinah.
With regard to the argument that certain third countries have built new capacities and may reduce or even stop imports in the future, thus allowing more spare capacities for exports to the Community, it is noted that there is no indication that the fast growing demand for PSF worldwide would stop in the near future.
Kar zadeva trditev, da so nekatere tretje države vzpostavile nove zmogljivosti in lahko v prihodnosti zmanjšajo ali celo prekinejo uvoz ter tako neizkoriščene zmogljivosti namenijo za izvoz v Skupnost, je treba opomniti, da ni znakov, da bi se v bližnji prihodnosti hitro rastoče povpraševanje po RVP po vsem svetu prenehalo.
In this respect, it is also noted that the existing capacity in the Community could cover maximum 60 % of the growing Community demand in the RIP.
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti tudi, da lahko med OPP obstoječe zmogljivosti v Skupnosti pokrijejo največ 60 % naraščajočega povpraševanja Skupnosti.
Consequently, it is not expected that a world wide overcapacity situation is imminent or that it could affect significantly the Community market.
Zato se v bližnji prihodnosti ne pričakuje, da bodo po vsem svetu obstajale presežne zmogljivosti ali da bi to lahko imelo znaten negativen vpliv na trg Skupnosti.
Finally, it is true that upstream recycling industries could be negatively affected by the downsizing or even closure of Community producers of PSF, as the latter are the most important consumers of bottle flakes.
Nenazadnje je res, da lahko zmanjšanje števila proizvajalcev RVP v Skupnosti ali celo zaprtje njihovih obratov negativno vpliva na reciklažno industrijo, saj so ti najpomembnejši porabnik granulatov iz recikliranih plastenk.
However, this consideration is irrelevant to the determination on the likelihood of resumption of dumped exports from the countries concerned.
Vendar pa ta premislek ni pomemben pri ugotavljanju verjetnosti ponovnega pojava dampinškega izvoza iz zadevnih držav.
It is therefore considered that the comments of CIRFS and certain Community producers cannot change the conclusion that there is no likelihood of resumption of significant quantities of dumped exports to the Community from the countries concerned and, thus, the measures should be repealed and the proceedings terminated,
Zato se meni, da pripombe CIRFS in nekaterih proizvajalcev Skupnosti ne morejo spremeniti sklepne ugotovitve, da ni verjetnosti za ponoven pojav znatnega dampinškega izvoza iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost, zato je treba ukrepe razveljaviti in postopke zaključiti –
The anti-dumping measures on imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning originating in Australia, India, Indonesia and Thailand imposed by Regulations (EC) No 1522/2000 and (EC) No 2852/2000 are hereby repealed and the proceedings concerning these imports are terminated.
Protidampinški ukrepi za uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra, nemikanih, nečesanih ali drugače pripravljenih za predenje, s poreklom iz Avstralije, Indije, Indonezije in Tajske, uvedeni z uredbama (ES) št. 1522/2000 in (ES) št. 2852/2000, se razveljavijo, postopki v zvezi s tem uvozom pa se zaključijo.
The partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning originating in Thailand is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra, nemikanih, nečesanih ali drugače pripravljenih za predenje, s poreklom iz Tajske, se zaključi.
OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 116.
UL L 332, 28.12.2000, str. 116.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1333/2005 (OJ L 211, 13.8.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1333/2005 (UL L 211, 13.8.2005, str. 1).
OJ C 261, 23.10.2004, p. 2.
UL C 261, 23.10.2004, str. 2.
OJ C 130, 27.5.2005, p. 8.
UL C 130, 27.5.2005, str. 8.
OJ C 174, 14.7.2005, p. 15; OJ C 307, 3.12.2005, p. 2; OJ C 323, 20.12.2005, p. 21.
UL C 174, 14.7.2005, str. 15; UL C 307, 3.12.2005, str. 2; UL C 323, 20.12.2005, str. 21.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1516/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1516/2006
to Commission Regulation of 12 October 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1517/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1517/2006
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine [1], and in particular point (f) in the second subparagraph of Article 33(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino [1] in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 33(1)(f) Uredbe,
Such measures may be limited to certain categories of wine and/or certain areas of production, and may apply to quality wines psr at the request of the Member State concerned.
Ta ukrep se lahko omeji na nekatere kategorije vina ali nekatera področja pridelave in se na prošnjo zadevne države članice lahko uporabi za kakovostna vina, pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem območju.
Spain has requested that crisis distillation be opened for quality red wines produced in specified regions (psr) of its territory.
Španija je zaprosila za odprtje krizne destilacije za kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem območju na njenem ozemlju.
In particular, this concerns quality red wines produced in the specified region of Jumilla and quality red wines produced in the specified regions of Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona and Terra Alta.
Natančneje gre za kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenem območju Jumilla, ter kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenih pridelovalnih območjih Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona in Terra Alta.
Considerable surpluses have been recorded on the market in quality red wines psr, which are reflected in a fall in prices and a worrying rise in stocks towards the end of the current marketing year.
Ugotovljeni so bili večji presežki na trgu za ta kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem območju. To se odraža v padcu cen in zaskrbljujočem povečanju zalog ob koncu tekočega tržnega leta.
Since the conditions laid down in Article 30(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 are satisfied, a crisis distillation measure should be opened for a maximum of 100000 hectolitres of quality red wines produced in Jumilla and for a maximum of 85000 hectolitres of quality red wines produced in the specified regions of Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona and Terra Alta.
Ker so pogoji iz člena 30(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 izpolnjeni, je primerno predvideti odprtje krizne destilacije za največ 100000 hektolitrov kakovostnih rdečih vin, pridelanih na Jumilli, in za največ 85000 hektolitrov kakovostnih rdečih vin, pridelanih na določenih pridelovalnih območjih Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona in Terra Alta.
The crisis distillation opened by this Regulation must comply with the conditions laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms [2] as regards the distillation measure provided for in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999.
Krizna destilacija, ki se odpre s to uredbo, mora biti v skladu s pogoji iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1623/2000 z dne 25. julija 2000 o določitvi podrobnih izvedbenih pravil za Uredbo (ES) št. 1493/1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino ob upoštevanju tržnih mehanizmov [2] v zvezi z ukrepom destilacije iz člena 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999.
Crisis distillation as provided for in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 is hereby opened for a maximum of 100000 hectolitres of quality red wines produced in the specified region of Jumilla and of 85000 hectolitres of quality red wines produced in the specified regions of Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona and Terra Alta, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 concerning this type of distillation.
Krizna destilacija iz člena 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 se v skladu z določbami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1623/2000 v zvezi s to vrsto destilacije odpre za največjo količino 100000 litrov za kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem območju Jumilla, in za 85000 hektolitrov za kakovostna rdeča vina, pridelana na določenih pridelovalnih območjih Conca de Barberà, Costers del Segre, Empordà, Penedès, Tarragona in Terra Alta.
Producers may conclude contracts as provided for in Article 65 of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 (hereinafter referred to as the contracts) from 16 October to 17 November 2006.
Vsak proizvajalec lahko od 16. oktobra 2006 do 17. novembra 2006 sklene pogodbo o dostavi iz člena 65 Uredbe (ES) št. 1623/2000 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „pogodba“).
Spain shall take the administrative steps necessary to approve the contracts by 1 December 2006 at the latest.
Država članica sprejme potrebne administrativne postopke, da najpozneje do 1. decembra 2006 odobri pogodbe.
Spain shall notify the Commission before 12 December 2006 of the quantities of wine covered by approved contracts.
Država članica do 12. decembra 2006 sporoči Komisiji količino vina, zajetega v odobrenih pogodbah.
The quantities of wine covered by approved contracts shall be delivered to the distilleries not later than 11 May 2007.
Količine vina iz odobrenih pogodb se v destilarne dostavijo najpozneje do 11. maja 2007.
The alcohol obtained shall be delivered to the intervention agency in accordance with Article 6(1) not later than 31 July 2007.
Pridobljeni alkohol mora biti v skladu s členom 6(1) v intervencijsko agencijo dostavljen najpozneje do 31. julija 2007.
The minimum price paid for wine delivered for distillation under this Regulation shall be EUR 3/ % vol/hl.
Najnižja odkupna cena vina, dostavljenega v destilacijo v skladu s to uredbo, je 3,00 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
The price the intervention agency must pay distillers for raw alcohol delivered shall be EUR 3,367/ % vol/hl.
Cena, ki jo intervencijska agencija plača destilarni za dostavljeni surovi alkohol, je 3,367 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
Distillers may receive an advance of EUR 2,208/ % vol/hl on that amount.
Destilarna lahko na ta znesek prejme predujem 2,208 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1518/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1518/2006
The rates of the refunds applicable from 29 September 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1431/2006 [2].
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 29. septembra 2006 uporablajo za proizvode, navedene v Prilogi, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1431/2006 [2].
It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 1431/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,
Iz uporabe pravil in meril iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1431/2006 za informacije, ki so trenutno na razpolago Komisiji, izhaja, da je izvozna nadomestila, ki se trenutno uporabljajo, treba spremeniti v skladu s Prilogo k Uredbi –
The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1431/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.
Stopnje nadomestil, določene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1431/2006, se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k Uredbi.
OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 51.
UL L 270, 29.9.2006, str. 51.
Rates of the refunds applicable from 13 October 2006 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil od 13. oktobra 2006 za nekatere mlečne izdelke, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1519/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1519/2006
Rates of the refunds applicable from 13 October 2006 to certain cereals and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 13. oktobra 2006 uporabljajo za nekatere proizvode iz žit in riža, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1520/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1520/2006
These prices and duties have been last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1509/2006 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1509/2006 [4].
OJ L 280, 12.10.2006, p. 14.
UL L 280, 12.10.2006, str. 14.
Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029099 applicable from 13 October 2006
Spremenjeni zneski reprezentativnih cen in dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za beli sladkor, surovi sladkor in proizvode pod oznako KN 17029099, ki se uporabljajo od 13. oktobra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1521/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1521/2006
Export refunds on milk and milk products applicable from 13 October 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za mleko in mlečne izdelke, ki se uporabljajo od 13. oktobra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1522/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1522/2006
Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 10 October 2006.
Na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 580/2004 z dne 26. marca 2004 o določitvi postopka razpisa o izvoznih nadomestilih za nekatere mlečne izdelke [3] in po pregledu oddanih ponudb na razpis je ustrezno, da se določi največje izvozno nadomestilo za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 10. oktobra 2006.
For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 10 October 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za stalni razpis, ki ga začenja Uredba (ES) št. 581/2004 za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 10. oktobra 2006, je največji znesek nadomestila za izdelke iz člena 1(1) navedene Uredbe, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 October 2006.
Ta Uredba začne veljati 13. oktobra 2006.
Commission Regulation (EC) Νo 1523/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1523/2006
to Commission Regulation of 12 October 2006 fixing the export refunds on products processed from cereals and rice
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za predelane proizvode iz žit in riža
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1524/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1524/2006
establishing a prohibition of fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and Mediterranean by vessels flying the flag of France
o prepovedi ribolova na tuna v Atlantskem oceanu, vzhodno od zemljepisne dolžine 45° Z, in Sredozemskem morju s plovili, ki plujejo pod francosko zastavo