natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the significant margins applied between purchase and resales, it is evident that the two percentages simply cannot be compared.
Glede na znatne stopnje, ki veljajo med nakupom in ponovno prodajo, je očitno, da teh dveh odstotkov enostavno ni mogoče primerjati.
Concerning the claim that wholesalers and retailers would not accept any price increase, it is again stressed that this is conflicting with the claim by many importers that price increases will be passed on fully to the consumers, thus also distributors, and could therefore not be accepted.
Glede na trditev, da prodajalci na debelo in drobno ne bi sprejeli nobenega zvišanja cen, je treba ponovno poudariti, da je to v nasprotju s trditvijo mnogih uvoznikov, da bodo zvišanja cen v celoti prenesena na potrošnike, torej tudi na distributerje, in tega zato ni mogoče sprejeti.
In any event, it is indeed true that wholesalers and retailers may indeed switch to suppliers than can deliver without anti-dumping duties, including the Community industry that would thus benefit from measures.
V vsakem primeru drži, da se lahko prodajalci na debelo in drobno dejansko preusmerijo na dobavitelje, ki lahko dobavljajo brez protidampinških dajatev, vključno z industrijo Skupnosti, ki bi tako imela koristi od ukrepov.
An association of importers contested the Commission's description of the two categories of importers, submitting that it does not reflect the market reality and that it is the product-mix, sales channels that are relevant for differentiating importers.
Združenje uvoznikov je izpodbijalo Komisijin opis dveh kategorij uvoznikov in predložilo stališče, da ne odraža tržne stvarnosti in da je za razlikovanje med uvozniki pomembna različna ponudba blaga in prodajne poti.
It further claimed that it is the net margin, and not the mark-up that is relevant when assessing the effect of measures.
Poleg tega je združenje trdilo, da je pri oceni učinka ukrepov pomemben neto dobiček in ne pribitek.
In this respect it should be noted that no sampling was applied, that cooperation from importers was significant and that therefore the Commission was in a position to draw its conclusion on a very detailed factual basis.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da ni bilo uporabljeno nobeno vzorčenje, da je bilo sodelovanje uvoznikov precejšnje in da je zato Komisija lahko sklepala na podlagi zelo podrobnih dejstev.
It is conceded that product-mix and sales channels are indeed relevant for the categorisation of importers.
Priznava se, da je za kategorizacijo uvoznikov dejansko pomembna različna ponudba blaga in prodajne poti.
In this respect those elements were also duly taken into consideration in the analysis.
V zvezi s tem so bile navedene prvine v analizi tudi ustrezno upoštevane.
As a matter of fact, the Commission differentiated between companies active in the high end of the market and the importers active in the lower end of the market, and indeed considered that those two categories of importers have different product mix and sales channels.
Komisija je pravzaprav razlikovala med družbami, dejavnimi na trgu visokokakovostnih izdelkov, in uvozniki, dejavnimi na trgu nizkokakovostnih izdelkov, ter dejansko upoštevala, da imata navedeni kategoriji uvoznikov različno ponudbo blaga in prodajne poti.
Furthermore, none of the comments given by the association of importers was such as to alter the conclusions that in the case of the importers active on the higher end of the market any ad valorem duty has a moderate impact as compared to the much higher selling price (thus profit), and that for those active on the lower end of the market the ad valorem duty would result only in a moderate absolute price increase and that given the level of their average margin of profit they would not be significantly affected by measures.
Poleg tega nobena pripomba združenja uvoznikov ni bila takšna, da bi spremenila sklepne ugotovitve, po katerih ima v primeru uvoznikov, dejavnih na trgu visokokakovostnih izdelkov, vsaka dajatev ad valorem zmeren učinek v primerjavi z veliko večjo prodajno ceno (in s tem dobičkom), in po katerih bi za subjekte, dejavne na trgu nizkokakovostnih izdelkov, dajatev ad valorem povzročila samo zmerno povečanje absolutne cene in jih glede na raven njihove povprečne stopnje dobička ukrepi ne bi bistveno prizadeli.
The conclusions set out in the recitals 265 to 275 of the provisional Regulation are therefore confirmed.
Zato se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 265 do 275 začasne uredbe.
It is therefore definitively confirmed that the imposition of measures is unlikely to have a significant negative impact on the situation of the importers in the Community in general, but also that such imposition may nevertheless have some negative effects on the financial situation of certain individual importers.
S tem se dokončno potrdi, da uvedba ukrepov na splošno verjetno ne bo bistveno negativno vplivala na položaj uvoznikov v Skupnosti pa tudi da lahko ima takšna uvedba vseeno nekatere negativne učinke na finančno stanje nekaterih neodvisnih uvoznikov.
On balance, however, those negative effects are not expected to have a significant impact on the overall financial situation of the importers.
Na splošno pa ni pričakovati, da bi navedeni negativni učinki bistveno vplivali na splošno finančno stanje uvoznikov.
Other considerations
Drugi premisleki
It has also been argued that measures were not in the Community interest because Vietnam is a developing country which needs to export shoes, because duties on imports from the PRC might imperil good economic relations with this country with a potentially large market, and because workers in Vietnam and the PRC could suffer from such measures.
Trdilo se je tudi, da ukrepi niso v interesu Skupnosti, ker je Vietnam država v razvoju, ki mora izvažati čevlje, ker bi lahko dajatve na uvoz iz LRK ogrozile dobre gospodarske odnose s to državo, ki ima potencialno velik trg, in ker bi lahko takšni ukrepi prizadeli delavce v Vietnamu in LRK.
In accordance with Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation and in line with consistent practice of the Institutions since the current basic Regulation entered into force, this type of arguments are not part of the Community interest analysis.
V skladu s členom 21(1) osnovne uredbe in v skladu z ustaljeno prakso institucij od začetka veljavnosti sedanje osnovne uredbe te vrste utemeljitve niso del analize interesa Skupnosti.
The Community interest analysis is an economic analysis focussing on the economic impact of taking/not taking anti-dumping measures on operators within the Community.
Analiza interesa Skupnosti je ekonomska analiza gospodarskega vpliva uvedbe/neuvedbe protidampinških ukrepov na gospodarske subjekte v Skupnosti.
It is not a tool by which anti-dumping investigations can be instrumentalised for general political considerations relating to foreign policy, development policy etc. This is also confirmed by the list of parties which have standing under Article 21 of the basic Regulation.
Analiza ni orodje, s katerim bi protidampinške preiskave namenili splošnim političnim razmišljanjem o zunanji politiki, razvojni politiki itd. To potrjuje tudi seznam strank, ki imajo po členu 21 osnovne uredbe pravico do pripomb.
While this list is not exhaustive (in some investigations, suppliers of the raw materials for the product concerned have also made comments and these comments have been taken into account), it follows clearly from the types of parties mentioned that only the economic effects on parties within the Community are at stake in this test.
Ker ta seznam ni izčrpen (v nekaterih preiskavah so dobavitelji surovin za zadevni izdelek prav tako predložili pripombe, ki so bile upoštevane), je iz tipov navedenih strank razvidno, da gre pri tem testiranju zgolj za gospodarske učinke na stranke znotraj Skupnosti.
At the same time, the Community interest test is not a cost/benefit analysis in the strict sense.
Istočasno testiranje interesa Skupnosti ni analiza stroškov in koristi v ožjem smislu.
While the various interests are put in balance, they are not weighed against each other in a mathematical equation, not least because of obvious methodological difficulties in quantifying each factor with a reasonable margin of security within the time available, and because there is not just one generally accepted model for a cost-benefit analysis.
Medtem ko so različni interesi uravnoteženi, to ravnotežje ni vzpostavljeno z matematično enačbo, zlasti zaradi očitnih metodoloških težav pri kvantifikaciji vsakega dejavnika z razumno stopnjo varnosti v razpoložljivem času in zato, ker ni samo enega splošno sprejetega modela analize stroškov in koristi.
This is also the reason why Article 21(1) of the basic Regulation stipulates that the need to restore effective competition shall be given special consideration and that measures may not be applied, on the basis of information submitted, where it can clearly be concluded that it is not in the Community interest to apply such measures.
Zato člen 21(1) osnovne uredbe določa, da se posebna pozornost nameni potrebi po vzpostavitvi učinkovite konkurence in da se ukrepov na podlagi predloženih informacij ne sme uporabiti, kadar je mogoče jasno sklepati, da uporaba takšnih ukrepov ni v interesu Skupnosti.
In other words, the law accepts that anti-dumping measures have certain negative effects on those parties which are typically not in favour of such measures.
Z drugimi besedami, zakonodaja priznava, da imajo protidampinški ukrepi nekatere negativne učinke na tiste stranke, ki teh ukrepov ponavadi ne podpirajo.
Measures would only be considered as not in the interest of the Community, if they had disproportionate effects on the aforementioned parties.
Ukrepi bi bili v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti samo, če bi imeli nesorazmeren učinek na navedene stranke.
At the beginning of the investigation and also at provisional stage, the Commission invited all parties to submit information as to the possible effects of taking/not taking measures on them.
Komisija je na začetku preiskave in tudi v začasni fazi vse stranke pozvala k predložitvi informacij o možnih učinkih uvedbe/neuvedbe ukrepov nanje.
As explained in detail at the provisional stage, but also in this Regulation, no information has been received which points to such disproportionate effects.
Kot je bilo podrobno pojasnjeno v začasni fazi in tudi v tej uredbi, ni bila prejeta nobena informacija o takšnih nesorazmernih učinkih.
There is nothing in the file, which could even remotely confirm the allegation made that the economic impact of duties is such that every euro which European producers may gain as a result of the duties will equally result in a loss of EUR 8 for consumer and user industries as claimed by one Member State.
V dokumentaciji ni ničesar, kar bi lahko vsaj na daleč potrdilo trditev, da je gospodarski vpliv dajatev takšen, da bo vsak euro, ki bi ga lahko evropski proizvajalci dobili kot rezultat dajatev, istočasno pomenil izgubo 8 EUR za potrošnika in predelovalno industrijo, kot trdi ena država članica.
As far as the argument of taking measures against developing countries is concerned, it is the Community's constant practice to take such actions indiscriminately against developing and developed countries, whenever warranted.
Kar zadeva utemeljitev o sprejetju ukrepov proti državam v razvoju, je stalna praksa Skupnosti, da uporablja takšne ukrepe, kadar je to upravičeno, enako za države v razvoju in razvite države.
With regard to the argument that anti-dumping measures might put into danger good economic relations with the PRC, it should be considered that if this argument was pushed to its logical consequence, the Community's anti-dumping actions would be dependent on whether or not the third country concerned threatens with some negative consequences in the event of taking measures.
Kar zadeva utemeljitev, da bi lahko protidampinški ukrepi ogrozili dobre gospodarske odnose z LRK, je treba upoštevati, da bi bila logična posledica te utemeljitve ta, da so protidampinški ukrepi Skupnosti odvisni od tega, ali zadevna tretja država v primeru sprejetja ukrepov grozi s kakšnimi negativnimi posledicami ali ne.
Moreover, such an approach would be an invitation to the third country to raise the prospect of some negative consequences.
Poleg tega bi takšen pristop pomenil poziv tretji državi, da poveča možnost nekaterih negativnih posledic.
Finally, both considerations are not compatible with the notion of a rules-based instrument and a quasi-judicial investigation.
Navsezadnje noben razmislek ni združljiv z instrumentom, ki temelji na pravilih, in parasodno preiskavo.
It was also argued that one Member State was dependent on footwear imports.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je ena država članica odvisna od uvoza obutve.
However, nothing in the file suggests that these imports can only be sourced from the two countries concerned.
Vendar nič v dokumentaciji ne navaja, da je mogoče te izdelke uvažati samo iz dveh zadevnih držav.
There are ample sources of supply within the Community and in third countries not concerned.
V Skupnosti in tretjih državah, ki jih to ne zadeva, je ogromno virov oskrbe.
Imports can also continue to be sourced from the PRC and Vietnam and the effect of the duties is not such as to foreclose the market.
Lahko se tudi še naprej uvaža iz LRK in Vietnama, učinek dajatev pa ne bo povzročil izključitve iz trga.
In sum, neither the current law nor the results of the investigation justify not to take anti-dumping action on any of the grounds mentioned at the beginning of this section.
Če povzamemo, niti sedanja zakonodaja niti rezultati preiskave ne upravičujejo neuvedbe protidampinškega ukrepa zaradi katerih koli razlogov, navedenih na začetku tega oddelka.
The above analysis has taken into account, and addressed where necessary, the comments submitted by the various interested parties.
Zgornja analiza je upoštevala in po potrebi obravnavala pripombe, ki so jih predložile različne zainteresirane stranke.
Those did however not alter the conclusions drawn at provisional stage.
Navedene pripombe pa niso spremenile sklepnih ugotovitev iz začasne faze.
It is therefore definitively confirmed that:
Zato se dokončno potrdi, da:
it is in the interest of the Community industry to impose measures, since those measures are expected to, at least, restrain the high level of imports at dumped prices which proved to have a significant negative impact on the financial situation the Community industry,
je uvedba ukrepov v interesu Skupnosti, saj je pričakovati, da bodo navedeni ukrepi vsaj omejili visoko stopnjo dampinškega uvoza, ki dokazano znatno negativno vpliva na finančni položaj industrije Skupnosti,
consumers will not be affected by the effect of anti-dumping measures or, if at all, only to a very marginal extent,
učinek protidampinških ukrepov ne bo vplival na potrošnike oziroma bo vplival le v zelo omejenem obsegu,
the distributors and retailers may see their purchase prices of the product concerned increase, but as compared to their overall costs and situation, they will probably not be significantly affected by measures,
se bodo nakupne cene zadevnega izdelka za distributerje in prodajalce na drobno morda zvišale, vendar v primerjavi z njihovimi celotnimi stroški in položajem ukrepi nanje verjetno ne bodo bistveno vplivali,
on average, importers would be in a position to accommodate the imposition of measures, although depending on their specific situation, some may indeed face certain adverse effects, especially those exclusively supplied by footwear from the countries concerned,
bi se v povprečju uvozniki lahko uspešno prilagodili uvedbi ukrepov, čeprav bi se lahko pri nekaterih glede na njihov posebni položaj pojavili določeni škodljivi učinki, zlasti pri tistih, ki se oskrbujejo izključno z obutvijo iz zadevnih držav,
other interests, even if they were to be taken into account, are not as such that they would override the interest of taking anti-dumping measures.
drugi interesi, tudi če bi se jih upoštevalo, ne bi prevladali nad interesom uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
Therefore, and on balance, it is considered that imposing measures, i.e. removing materially injurious dumping, would allow the Community industry to maintain its activity and bring an end to the successive closures and job losses it faced in the last years, and that the adverse effects that the measures may have on certain other economic operators in the Community are not disproportionate as compared to those beneficial effects for the Community industry.
Zaradi navedenega in na splošno velja, da bi uvedba ukrepov, tj. odprava dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, industriji Skupnosti omogočila, da nadaljuje s svojimi dejavnostmi in da se prenehajo zaporedna zapiranja tovarn in izgube delovnih mest, s katerimi se je soočala v preteklih letih, ter da škodljivi učinki, ki bi jih ukrepi lahko imeli na nekatere gospodarske subjekte v Skupnosti, niso nesorazmerni v primerjavi z navedenimi koristnimi učinki za industrijo Skupnosti.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, resulting injury and Community interest, definitive measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and in Vietnam should be imposed.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, posledično škodo in interesom Skupnosti je treba uvesti dokončne ukrepe na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK in Vietnama.
The level of the definitive anti-dumping measures should be sufficient to eliminate the material injury to the Community industry caused by the dumped imports, without exceeding the dumping margins found.
Stopnja dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov mora zadostovati za odpravo znatne škode, ki jo je industriji Skupnosti povzročil dampinški uvoz, ne da bi presegla ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the materially injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports taking into account the existence of a quota regime covering imports from PRC until the end of 2004.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, je bilo sklenjeno, da morajo ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočiti, da pokrije svoje proizvodne stroške in ustvari dobiček pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga industrija te vrste v sektorju lahko ustvarila v okviru normalnih konkurenčnih pogojev, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza, ob upoštevanju obstoječega režima kvot za uvoz iz LRK do konca leta 2004.
Underselling
Prodaja pod ceno
At provisional stage it was considered that a profit margin of 2 % of turnover could be regarded as an appropriate level that the Community industry could be expected to obtain in the absence of materially injurious dumping, on the grounds that this corresponds to the highest level of profit achieved by the Community industry during the period under examination.
V začasni fazi se je štelo, da se lahko stopnja dobička v višini 2 % prometa obravnava kot ustrezna stopnja, ki bi jo lahko industrija Skupnosti dosegla brez obstoja dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, ker to ustreza najvišji stopnji dobička, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti dosegla med obravnavanim obdobjem.
This was however strongly contested by the Community industry on the grounds that the economic situation of the Community industry during the whole period considered did not reflect the level of profit that it could achieve in the absence of materially injurious dumping, because prices were already depressed when the industry reached that level of profit, and with that level of profit the industry could not make the necessary investments in order to remain competitive.
Industrija Skupnosti pa je temu močno nasprotovala, ker gospodarski položaj industrije Skupnosti med celotnim obravnavanim obdobjem ni odražal stopnje dobička, ki bi jo lahko industrija dosegla brez obstoja dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, saj so bile cene, ko je industrija dosegla navedeno stopnjo dobička, že znižane, z navedeno stopnjo dobička pa industrija ne bi mogla uresničiti ustreznih naložb za ohranitev svoje konkurenčnosti.
Lastly, the Community industry claimed that the 2 % used was far below the profit margin achieved by importers, and that using a profit level of 10 % would be the absolute minimum.
Nazadnje je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je uporabljena 2-odstotna stopnja precej nižja od stopnje dobička, ki so jo dosegli uvozniki, in da bi bila uporaba 10-odstotne stopnje dobička absolutni minimum.
This claim was carefully analysed, and the issue of the determination of profit level to be used for the injury calculation was re-examined.
Ta trditev je bila skrbno analizirana, prav tako pa se je ponovno preučilo vprašanje določitve stopnje dobička, ki ga je treba uporabiti pri izračunu škode.
Firstly, it should be noted that the level of profit achieved by the importers is not a proper benchmark because of the different nature of those operators, and can therefore not be used as a reference.
Najprej je treba upoštevati, da stopnja dobička, ki so jo dosegli uvozniki, zaradi različne narave navedenih subjektov ni ustrezno merilo uspešnosti in je zato ni mogoče uporabiti kot referenčno vrednost.
Secondly, with regard to a reasonably achievable profit margin, upon disclosure, substantiated comments were submitted by the Community industry that a profit margin not just of 2 % but of 6 % on turnover should be regarded as an appropriate level that the Community industry could be expected to obtain in the absence of materially injurious dumping.
Drugič, kar zadeva stopnjo dobička, ki je razumno dosegljiva, je industrija Skupnosti po razkritju predložila utemeljene pripombe, da je ustrezna stopnja, ki bi jo lahko industrija Skupnosti dosegla brez obstoja dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, stopnja dobička v višini 6 % in ne le 2 % prometa.
In this respect the Community industry provided evidence that with regard to footwear not subject to materially injurious dumping it indeed achieved such higher margins.
V zvezi s tem je industrija Skupnosti predložila dokaze, da je pri obutvi, ki ni predmet dampinga, ki povzroča znatno škodo, dejansko dosegla tako visoke stopnje.
Consequently, the applicable profit margin was reconsidered and adjusted to a 6 % level on turnover.
Zato se je veljavna stopnja dobička ponovno proučila in prilagodila stopnji v višini 6 % prometa.
Some interested parties claimed that it is the Commission's consistent practice to calculate an injury margin only when the Community industry is making losses, or otherwise the level of injury should be limited to the undercutting.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je ustaljena praksa Komisije izračunavati stopnjo škode samo takrat, ko industrija Skupnosti ustvarja izgubo, drugače pa mora biti stopnja škode omejena na nelojalno nižanje cen.
This claim was however rejected because the injury margin is regularly established for the purpose of applying the lesser-duty-rule while the undercutting margin is established pursuant to Article 3(3) of the basic Regulation.
Ta trditev pa je bila zavrnjena, saj se stopnja škode redno določa za uporabo pravila nižje dajatve, medtem ko je stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen določena v skladu s členom 3(3) osnovne uredbe.
In this context, the injury margin is relevant if the dumped imports have depressed prices, and this can be the case even if the industry is still profitable.
V tem okviru je stopnja škode pomembna, kadar so cene dampinškega uvoza znižane, to pa lahko velja tudi, če industrija še vedno posluje z dobičkom.
Finally, like in the case of the undercutting margin, various comments were received with respect to the injury margin calculations.
Nazadnje so bile kot v primeru stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen predložene različne pripombe tudi glede izračunov stopnje škode.