natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Given the large number of cooperating exporting producers of the product concerned in India, a sample was selected in accordance with Article 27 of the basic Regulation and individual duty rates ranging from 4,4 % to 10,4 % were imposed on the companies included in the sample, while other cooperating companies not included in the sample were attributed a duty rate of 7,6 %.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v Indiji je bil vzorec izbran v skladu s členom 27 osnovne uredbe, individualna stopnja dajatve v višini od 4,4 % do 10,4 % pa je bila uvedena za družbe, vključene v vzorec, medtem ko je bila drugim sodelujočim družbam, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, določena stopnja dajatve v višini 7,6 %.
A residual duty rate of 10,4 % was imposed on all other companies.
Za vse druge družbe je bila uvedena preostala dajatev v višini 10,4 %.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 stipulates that where any new exporting producer in India provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that it did not export to the Community the products described in Article 1(1) during the investigation period (1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002) (the first criterion), that it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in India which are subject to the anti-subsidy measures imposed by that Regulation (the second criterion) and that it has actually exported to the Community the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community (the third criterion), then Article 1(3) of that Regulation can be amended by granting the new exporting producer the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 7,6 %.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 določa, da če kateri koli nov proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji Komisiji zagotovi zadostne dokaze, da v obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002) v Skupnost ni izvažal izdelkov iz člena 1(1) („prvi pogoj“), da ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Indiji, za katerega veljajo protisubvencijski ukrepi, uvedeni z navedeno uredbo („drugi pogoj“), in je po obdobju preiskave v Skupnost dejansko izvozil zadevne izdelke, za katere veljajo ukrepi, ali je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost za izvoz znatne količine v Skupnost („tretji pogoj“), potem se člen 1(3) navedene uredbe lahko spremeni tako, da se novemu proizvajalcu izvozniku dodeli stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, to je 7,6 %.
The original Regulation has been amended twice by amending Regulations, namely Council Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004 [3], and Council Regulation (EC) No 122/2006 [4].
Prvotna uredba je bila spremenjena dvakrat, in sicer z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2143/2004 [3] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 122/2006 [4].
Both Regulations have added to the list of Indian exporting producers in the Annex to the Regulation the names of companies exporting the product concerned originating in India who satisfied the Commission's services that they met the criteria set out in the original Regulation.
V obeh uredbah so na seznam indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Prilogi k Uredbi dodana imena družb, ki izvažajo zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz Indije in so izpolnile merila pogoje služb Komisije iz prvotne uredbe.
NEW EXPORTERS/PRODUCERS' REQUESTS
ZAHTEVKI NOVIH IZVOZNIKOV/PROIZVAJALCEV
Nineteen Indian companies applied to be granted the same status of the companies cooperating in the original investigation not included in the sample (newcomer status) since the publication of the previous amending Regulation.
19 indijskih družb je po objavi predhodno spremenjene Uredbe zaprosilo za isti status, kot ga imajo družbe, ki so sodelovale v preiskavi, vendar niso bile vključene v vzorec („status novinca“).
The 19 applicants were:
Teh 19 družb prosilk je:
Applicant Company
Družba
Four companies requesting newcomer status did not reply to the questionnaire intended to verify that they met the conditions set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004, and their requests had, therefore, to be rejected.
Štiri družbe, ki so zahtevale status novinca, niso izpolnile vprašalnika, s katerim naj bi se preverilo, ali izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004, zato je bilo treba njihov zahtevek zavrniti.
One company returned the questionnaire twice, both times incomplete and with contradictory information.
Ena družba je dvakrat izpolnila vprašalnik, ampak vsakič nepopolno in z navedbo nasprotujočih si informacij.
The third questionnaire sent to the company was not returned and as such it was unable to prove that it complied with the criteria to be granted new exporting producer status.
Tretjega vprašalnika, ki ji je bil poslan, družba ni izpolnila in zato ni bilo mogoče dokazati, da izpolnjuje pogoje za odobritev statusa novega proizvajalca izvoznika.
That company's request was therefore rejected.
Zato je bil zahtevek družbe zavrnjen.
The remaining 14 companies submitted complete replies to the questionnaire and were therefore considered for newcomer status.
Preostalih štirinajst družb je predložilo v celoti izpolnjene vprašalnike in status novinca jim je bil odobren.
The evidence provided by six of the above-mentioned Indian exporters/producers is considered sufficient to grant them the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and consequently to add them to the list of exporters/producers in the Annex (the Annex) to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Dokazi šestih zgoraj navedenih indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev se štejejo za zadostne, da se jim odobri stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec (tj. 7,6 %), in se jih doda na seznam izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Prilogi („Priloga“) k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 74/2004.
The remaining eight companies had their applications for new exporting producer status rejected for the following reasons:
Zahtevke preostalih osmih družb za status novega proizvajalca izvoznika je bilo treba zavrniti iz naslednjih razlogov:
Seven companies failed to provide evidence that they had exported the product concerned after the investigation period to the EC or that they had irrevocable contractual obligations to export the product concerned in significant quantities to the EC.
Sedem družb ni zagotovilo dokazov, da so po obdobju preiskave zadevni izdelek izvažale v ES ali da so prevzele nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost, da izvozijo znatne količine v ES.
One company is related to one company already listed in the original Regulation and its application for newcomer status was therefore rejected as it failed the second criterion mentioned in Article 2 of the original Regulation.
Ena družba je povezana z družbo, ki je že na seznamu v prvotni uredbi, in njen zahtevek za status novinca je bilo treba zavrniti, saj ni izpolnila drugega pogoja iz člena 2 prvotne uredbe.
Companies for which newcomer status was not granted were informed of the reasons of this decision and given an opportunity to make their views known in writing.
Družbe, ki jim status novinca ni bil odobren, so bile obveščene o razlogih te odločitve in dana jim je bila priložnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča.
All arguments and submissions made by interested parties were analysed and duly taken into account where warranted,
Vsi argumenti in predlogi zainteresiranih strank so bili analizirani in upoštevani, če so bili utemeljeni –
The following companies shall be added to the list of producers from India listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004:
Naslednje družbe se dodajo na seznam proizvajalcev iz Indije, navedenih v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 122/2006 (OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 122/2006 (UL L 22, 26.1.2006, str. 3).
OJ L 22, 26.1.2006, p. 3.
UL L 22, 26.1.2006, str. 3.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1841/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1841/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 December 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 15. decembra 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 14 December 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 14. decembra 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1842/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1842/2006
Export refunds on milk and milk products applicable from 15 December 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za mleko in mlečne izdelke, ki se uporabljajo od 15. decembra 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1843/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1843/2006
Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products [3] and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 12 December 2006.
Na podlagi člena 5 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 580/2004 z dne 26. marca 2004 o določitvi postopka razpisa o izvoznih nadomestilih za nekatere mlečne izdelke [3] in po pregledu oddanih ponudb na razpis je ustrezno, da se določi največje izvozno nadomestilo za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 12. decembra 2006.
For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 12 December 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.
Za stalni razpis, ki ga začenja Uredba (ES) št. 581/2004 za razpisno obdobje, ki se konča 12. decembra 2006, je največji znesek nadomestila za izdelke iz člena 1(1) navedene Uredbe, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 December 2006.
Ta Uredba začne veljati 15. decembra 2006.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1844/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1844/2006
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1713/2006 (OJ L 321, 21.11.2006, p. 11).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1713/2006 (UL L 321, 21.11.2006, str. 11).
Rates of the refunds applicable from 15 December 2006 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil od 15. decembra 2006 za nekatere mlečne izdelke, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1845/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1845/2006
establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in ICES zone Vb, VIaN (EC waters), VIb by vessels flying the flag of France
o prepovedi ribolova na atlantski sled v coni ICES Vb, VIaN (vode ES), VIb s plovili, ki plujejo pod francosko zastavo
Vb, VIaN (EC waters), VIb
Vb, VIaN (vode ES), VIb
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1846/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1846/2006
establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in ICES zone IIa (non-EC waters), Vb (EC waters), VI, VII, VIIIa, b, d, e, XII, XIV by vessels flying the flag of France
o prepovedi ribolova na skušo v coni ICES II a (vode zunaj ES), V b (vode ES), VI, VII, VIII a, b, d, e, XII, XIV s plovili, ki plujejo pod francosko zastavo
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to common fisheries policy [2], and in particular Article 26(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 z dne 12. oktobra 1993 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike [2] in zlasti člena 21(3) Uredbe,
IIa (non-EC waters), Vb (EC waters), VI, VII, VIIIa, b, d, e, XII, XIV
II a (vode zunaj ES), V b (vode ES), VI, VII, VIII a, b, d, e, XII, XIV
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1847/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1847/2006
adapting certain horizontal Regulations in the common agricultural policy by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
o prilagoditvi nekaterih horizontalnih uredb v skupni kmetijski politiki zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji
In view of the accession to the Community of Bulgaria and Romania (hereinafter referred to as ‘the new Member States’), Commission Regulations (EEC) No 120/89 of 19 January 1989 laying down common detailed rules for the application of export levies and charges on agricultural products [1], (EEC) No 3515/92 of 4 December 1992 laying down common detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1055/77 on the storage and movement of products bought in by an intervention agency [2], (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products [3], (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products [4], (EC) No 2298/2001 of 26 November 2001 laying down detailed rules for the export of products supplied as food aid [5], (EC) No 2090/2002 of 26 November 2002 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 as regards physical checks carried out when agricultural products qualifying for refunds are exported [6] and (EC) No 639/2003 of 9 April 2003 laying down detailed rules pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 as regards requirements for the granting of export refunds related to the welfare of live bovine animals during transport [7] should be adapted and provision should be made for certain indications in the languages of the new Member States.
Zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije (v nadaljnjem besedilu „novi državi članici“) k Skupnosti je treba prilagoditi uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 120/89 z dne 19. januarja 1989 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo izvoznih prelevmanov in dajatev za kmetijske proizvode [1], (EGS) št. 3515/92 z dne 4. decembra 1992 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1055/77 o skladiščenju in premikanju proizvodov, ki jih odkupi intervencijska agencija [2], (ES) št. 800/1999 z dne 15. aprila 1999 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [3], (ES) št. 1291/2000 z dne 9. junija 2000 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode [4], (ES) št. 2298/2001 z dne 26. novembra 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za izvoz proizvodov, dobavljenih kot pomoč v hrani [5], (ES) št. 2090/2002 z dne 26. novembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 386/90 glede fizičnih pregledov, opravljenih pri izvozu kmetijskih proizvodov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za nadomestila [6], in (ES) št. 639/2003 z dne 9. aprila 2003 o določitvi podrobnih pravilih v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1254/1999 glede zahtev za odobritev izvoznih nadomestil v zvezi z dobrim počutjem živega goveda med prevozom [7] ter določiti nekatere navedbe v jezikih novih držav članic.
The abovementioned Regulations should therefore be amended accordingly,
Navedeni uredbi je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 120/89 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EGS) št. 120/89 se spremeni:
In Article 4a(2), the third subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 4a(2) se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘The document sent to the customs office where the export formalities were carried out is completed by the customs office of exit to include one of the entries listed in Annex I.’
„Dokument, ki se pošlje carinskem uradu, kjer so bile opravljene carinske izvozne formalnosti, izpolni carinski urad izstopa, ki vključi enega od vnosov iz Priloge I.“.
In the second subparagraph of Article 13(2), ‘Annex’ is replaced by ‘Annex II’.
V drugem pododstavku člena 13(2) se „Prilogi“ nadomesti s „Prilogi II“.
Regulation (EC) No 3515/92 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EGS) št. 3515/92 se spremeni:
The second subparagraph of Article 2 is replaced by the following:
Drugi pododstavek člena 2 se nadomesti:
‘The export declaration and, should the occasion arise, the external Community transit document or the equivalent national document shall show one of the entries listed in Annex I.’
„Izvozna deklaracija in po potrebi zunanji tranzitni dokument Skupnosti ali ustrezni nacionalni dokument navajata enega od vnosov iz Priloge I.“.
The first subparagraph of Article 5 is replaced by the following:
Prvi pododstavek člena 5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘In cases coming within the second indent of Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 1055/77, where products are dispatched to another Member State as a transfer operation, the products shall be accompanied by a Control Copy T5 as referred to in Articles 912a to 912g of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93.
„V primerih po drugi alinei člena 2 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1055/77, ko se proizvodi pošljejo v drugo državo članico v obliki premestitve, mora proizvode spremljati kontrolni izvod T5 v smislu členov 912a do 912g Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93.
The Control Copy T5 shall be issued by the intervention agency which sends the products and shall show in box 104 one of the entries listed in Annex II.3.
Kontrolni izvod T5 izda intervencijska agencija, ki pošlje proizvode, in v polju 104 navaja enega od vnosov iz Priloge II.3.
The text in Annex II to this Regulation is added as Annex I and Annex II.
Besedilo v Prilogi II k tej uredbi se doda kot Priloga I in Priloga II.
In Article 9(1)(c), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 9(1)(c) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘In such cases, one of the entries listed in Annex Ia shall be added by the competent authorities of the Member State of destination of the T5 control copy or the Member State where a national document is used as proof under the heading “Remarks” in the section headed “Control of use and/or destination” on the T5 control copy or under the corresponding heading of the national document.’
„V takšnih primerih pristojni organi namembne države članice kontrolnega izvoda T5 ali države članice, v kateri se nacionalni dokument uporablja kot dokaz pod ‚Pripombami‘ v rubriki z naslovom ‚Nadzor uporabe in/ali destinacije‘ na kontrolnem izvodu T5 ali pod ustrezni naslov nacionalnega dokumenta, vpišejo enega od vpisov iz Priloge Ia.“.
in paragraph 4, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V odstavku (4) se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Where a product circulating under the external Community transit procedure or the common transit procedure is placed in a Member State other than that of export under a procedure as provided for in paragraph 1 for carriage to a station of destination or delivery to a consignee outside the customs territory of the Community, the customs office at which the product has been placed under a procedure as referred to above shall insert one of the entries listed in Annex Ib under “Remarks” in the section headed “Control of use and/or destination” on the back of the original of the T5 control copy.’;
„Če se proizvod, ki se ga pošilja v okviru zunanjega tranzitnega postopka Skupnosti ali skupnega tranzitnega postopka, v državi članici, ki ni država članica izvoza, obravnava po postopku iz odstavka 1 za prevoz do namembne postaje ali za dobavo prejemniku izven carinskega območja Skupnosti, carinski urad, pri katerem se proizvod obravnava po zgoraj navedenem postopku, pod ‚Pripombe‘ v rubriki z naslovom ‚Nadzor uporabe in/ali destinacije‘ na zadnji stani izvirnika kontrolnega izvoda T5 vpiše enega od vpisov iz Priloge Ib.“.
in paragraph 5, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V odstavku (5) se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Where a product is taken over by the railways in the Member State of export or in another Member State and circulates under the external Community transit procedure or the common transit procedure under a contract of carriage for combined road-rail transport by rail to a destination outside the customs territory of the Community, the customs office competent for or nearest to the rail terminal at which the product is taken over by the railways shall insert one of the entries listed in Annex Ic under “Remarks” in the section headed “Control of use and/or destination” on the back of the original of the T5 control copy.’
„Če železnica prevzame proizvod v državi članici izvoza ali v drugi državi članici in se proizvod pošilja v destinacijo izven carinskega območja Skupnosti v okviru zunanjega Skupnostnega tranzitnega postopka ali skupnega tranzitnega postopka po prevozni pogodbi za kombinirani cestno-železniški prevoz po železnici, pristojni carinski urad ali carinski urad, ki je najbližji železniškemu terminalu, kjer proizvod prevzame železnica, pod ‚Pripombe‘ v rubriki z naslovom ‚Nadzor uporabe in/ali destinacije‘ na zadnji stani izvirnika kontrolnega izvoda T5 vpiše enega od vpisov iz Priloge Ic.“.
In Article 41(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 41(2) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Boxes 33, 103 and 104 and, where appropriate, 105 of the T5 control copy shall be completed.
„Med drugim morajo biti izpolnjena polja 33, 103, 104 in, kadar je to ustrezno, 105 kontrolnega izvoda T5.
Box 104 of the T5 control copy shall be completed, under the heading “Other”, with one of the entries listed in Annex IIa.’
Polje 104 kontrolnega izvoda T5 se pod ‚Drugo‘ vpiše eden od vpisov iz Priloge IIa.“.
Article 44(5) is replaced by the following:
Člen 44(5) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where Article 8 applies to deliveries to a rig, one of the entries listed in Annex IIb shall be entered under “Other” in box 104 of the T5 control copy.’
Če se za dobave na ploščad uporablja člen 8, se pod ‚Drugo‘ v polju 104 kontrolnega izvoda T5 vpiše eden od vpisov iz Priloge IIb.“.
The text in Annex III to this Regulation is inserted as Annex Ia, Annex Ib, Annex Ic, Annex IIa and Annex IIb.
Besedilo v Prilogi III k tej uredbi se vstavi kot Priloga Ia, Priloga Ib, Priloga Ic, Priloga IIa in Priloga IIb.
In Annex IV, ‘Bulgaria’ and ‘Romania’ are deleted.
V Prilogi IV se črtata „Bolgarija“ in „Romunija“.
‘In such cases, one of the entries listed in Annex Ia shall be made by the issuing agency in section 6 of the licence or certificate.’
„V takšnih primerih organ izdaje v oddelek 6 licence ali spričevala vpiše enega izmed vnosov iz Priloge Ia.“.
The first paragraph of Article 16 is replaced by the following:
Prvi odstavek člena 16 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Applications for licences and licences with advance fixing of the refund which are drawn up in connection with a food-aid operation within the meaning of Article 10(4) of the Agreement on Agriculture, concluded as part of the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations, shall contain in section 20 at least one of the entries listed in Annex Ib.’
„Zahtevki za licence in licence z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila, sestavljeni v zvezi z ukrepi pomoči v hrani v smislu člena 10(4) Sporazuma o kmetijstvu, sklenjenega med urugvajskim krogom večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj, vsebujejo v oddelku 20 vsaj enega od vnosov iz Priloge Ib.“.
In Article 18(4) ‘BG’ for Bulgaria and ‘RO’ for Romania is added.
V četrtem pododstavku člena 18(4) se doda „BG“ za Bolgarijo in „RO“ za Romunijo.
Article 33 is amended as follows:
Člen 33 se spremeni:
In paragraph 2, the third subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V odstavku 2 se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Where the sole purpose of the T5 control copy is the release of the security, the T5 control copy shall contain in section 106 one of the entries listed in Annex Ic.’
„Če je edini namen kontrolnega izvoda T 5 sprostitev jamstva, kontrolni izvod T 5 v razdelku 106 vsebuje enega izmed vnosov iz Priloge Ic.“.
In paragraph 3, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V odstavku 3 se prvi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim: