natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ningbo Liftstar Material Transport Equipment Factory, Zhouyi Village, Zhanqi Town, Yin Zhou District, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, 315144, PRC
Ningbo Liftstar Material Transport Equipment Factory, vas Zouji, mesto Zanki, okrožje Jin Zou, mesto Ningbo, provinca Zejang, 315144, LRK
Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 656 North Taoyuan Road, Ninghai, Zhejiang Province, 315600, PRC
Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 656, North Taoyuan Road, Ningaj, provinca Zejang, 315600, LRK
Ningbo Tailong Machinery Co. Ltd, Economic Developing Zone, Ninghai, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, 315600, PRC
Ningbo Tailong Machinery Co. Ltd, gospodarska cona, Ningaj, mesto Ningbo, provinca Zejang, 315600, LRK
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 58, Jing Yi Road, Economy Development Zone, Changxin, Zhejiang Province, 313100, PRC
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd, 58, Jing Yi Road, industrijska cona, Čangdžin, provinca Zejang, 313100, LRK
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Commission Regulation No 128/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts falling within CN codes ex84279000 and ex84312000 (TARIC codes 8427900010 and 8431200010) originating in the People’s Republic of China shall be definitively collected, in accordance with the rules set out below.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 128/2005 na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, uvrščenih pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000 (oznaki TARIC 8427900010 in 8431200010), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se dokončno poberejo v skladu s pravili, določenimi spodaj.
The amounts secured in excess of the amount of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo znesek dokončne protidampinške dajatve, se sprostijo.
Where the definitive duty is higher than the provisional duty, only the amounts secured at the level of the provisional duty shall be definitively collected.
Pri dokončni dajatvi, ki je višja od začasne dajatve, se dokončno poberejo samo zneski, zavarovani v fazi začasne dajatve.
OJ L 25, 28.1.2005, p. 16.
UL L 25, 28.1.2005, str. 16.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate B, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat B, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Bruselj, Belgija.
This significantly undermines the argument on comparison of costs. Consequently, the claim should be rejected.
To znatno spodbija navedbo o primerjavi stroškov, zato je treba zahtevek zavrniti.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1175/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1175/2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, ki ga je predložila po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom,
On 29 January 2005, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 145/2005 of 28 January 2005 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China [2] (hereinafter ‘the provisional Regulation’), imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of barium carbonate originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘the PRC’).
januarja 2005 je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 145/2005 dne 28. januarja 2005 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Skupnost.
Subsequently to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose the said provisional anti-dumping measures, several interested parties made written submissions containing their views on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta uvedba začasnih protidampinških ukrepov, je več zainteresiranih strank v pisni obliki predložilo svoja stališča glede začasnih ugotovitev.
No parties requested to be heard.
Nobena stranka ni zaprosila za zaslišanje.
The Commission continued to seek and verify all information it deemed necessary for the definitive findings.
Komisija je nadaljevala iskanje in preverjanje vseh informacij, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za njene dokončne ugotovitve.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih podjetij:
unrelated importer:
Nepovezani uvoznik:
Castle Colours Ltd, UK;
Castle Colours Ltd., Združeno kraljestvo;
Terreal SA, France,
Terreal S.A., Francija,
Torrecid SA, Spain.
Torrecid S.A., Španija.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations, on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of barium carbonate originating in the PRC and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti uvedbo dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz barijevega karbonata s poreklom iz LRK in dokončno pobiranje zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
The parties were also granted a period to make representations, subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov je bil strankam dan tudi rok za predložitev stališč.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po proučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
Since no new comments were received regarding the ‘product concerned’ and the ‘like product’, as defined in recitals 11 and 12 of the provisional Regulation, their contents are hereby confirmed.
Ker Komisija ni prejela novih pripomb v zvezi z „zadevnim izdelkom“ in „podobnim izdelkom“, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 11 in 12 začasne uredbe.
Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’)
Tržno gospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
In the absence of any comments, the contents of recitals 13 to 23 of the provisional Regulation concerning MET is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se glede TGO potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 13 do 23 začasne uredbe.
Individual Treatment (‘IT’)
Individualna obravnava („IO“)
In the absence of any comments, the contents of recitals 24 to 29 of the provisional Regulation concerning individual treatment is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve glede individualne obravnave iz uvodnih izjav 24 do 29 začasne uredbe.
Determination of normal value for cooperating producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za sodelujoče proizvajalce, katerim je bila odobrena TGO
For one exporting producer, in determining whether domestic sales were in the ordinary course of trade and also when constructing normal value for certain types of the product concerned, incorrect financing costs were used in calculating the provisional dumping margin.
Za enega proizvajalca izvoznika se je pri ugotavljanju, ali je bila domača prodaja opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine in tudi pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti nekaterih vrst zadevnega izdelka, pri izračunu začasne stopnje dampinga uporabil nepravilen znesek stroškov financiranja.
Therefore, for the calculation of the definitive dumping margin, the necessary corrections were made.
Zato so bili za izračun dokončne stopnje dampinga narejeni potrebni popravki.
For the other exporting producer, the sales value of waste was provisionally deducted from the cost of production.
Pri drugem proizvajalcu izvozniku se je prodajna vrednost odpadkov začasno odbila od proizvodnih stroškov.
However, after having reviewed the appropriate information, it was not certain whether the amount could be considered as deductible as waste.
Po pregledu ustreznih podatkov pa ni bilo jasno, ali je bilo znesek sploh upravičeno odšteti od stroškov proizvodnje kot vrednost odpadkov.
In this regard, and on the basis of the information available, it appeared that the ‘waste’ had actually a significant separate commercial value.
Glede na to in na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov se je izkazalo, da imajo „odpadki“ dejansko znatno ločeno tržno vrednost.
Moreover, in the absence of any inventories kept, it was not possible to properly quantify the amount under consideration.
Ker evidence niso bile vodene, prave višine obravnavanega zneska ni bilo mogoče določiti.
Finally, even in the event that this amount had to be deducted, the company attributed the whole amount to the product concerned whereas it also affected other products produced by this company.
Poleg tega je družba tudi v primerih, kadar bi bilo ta znesek treba odšteti, pripisala celotni znesek zadevnemu izdelku, čeprav je šlo tudi za druge izdelke, ki jih proizvaja ta družba.
Therefore, at the definitive stage, the deduction for waste was reversed.
Zato je bil odbitek za odpadke v okviru dokončne preiskave razveljavljen.
For the same exporting producer the value of the by-product was adjusted.
Za istega izvoznika se je vrednost stranskega proizvoda prilagodila.
The exporting producer concerned contested the approach taken and argued that waste, in the form of slag and lime, is disposed through synergy with an adjacent plant in a manner that reduced its total cost.
Zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik je ugovarjal in trdil, da odpadke v obliki žlindre in apna odstranjujejo v sodelovanju s sosednjo tovarno, kar znižuje skupne stroške.
It has to be noted that the said producer also claimed in its questionnaire that these sales should be considered as sales of a ‘by-product’.
Opozarja se, da je navedeni proizvajalec v svojem odgovoru na vprašalnik tudi izrazil stališče, da se mora ta prodaja šteti kot prodaja „stranskega proizvoda“.
In this regard, it is reiterated that the quantity of the product in question that was sold could not be established during the investigation.
V zvezi s tem se ponovno opozarja, da količine prodanega zadevnega izdelka med preiskavo ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti.
Furthermore, this revealed that sales to the neighbouring factory were of the by-product H2S only.
Poleg tega je preiskava razkrila, da je prodaja sosednji tovarni zajemala samo stranski proizvod H2S.
In this regard, it was considered that contradictory information was submitted, which could not be clarified after definitive disclosure.
V tem smislu se je štelo, da je bil predložen nasprotujoč si podatek, ki ga po dokončnem razkritju ni bilo mogoče razjasniti.
Secondly, this same producer claimed that the value of the by-product H2S, deducted from the cost of production, should have been higher.
Nadalje je ta isti proizvajalec trdil, da bi morala biti vrednost stranskega proizvoda H2S, odšteta od stroškov proizvodnje, višja.
However, the evidence collected during the investigation showed that this claim was overstated and had therefore to be rejected.
Vendar so med preiskavo zbrani dokazi pokazali, da je bila ta trditev pretirana, zato je bilo treba zavrniti.
Apart from the adjustments made, as set out in recitals 9 and 10 of this Regulation, and in the absence of any further comments, the contents of recitals 43 to 59 of the provisional Regulation concerning normal value is hereby confirmed.
Glede na to, da ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, se razen popravkov, določenih v uvodnih izjavah 9 in 10 te uredbe, potrdijo ugotovitve glede normalne vrednosti iz uvodnih izjav 43 do 59 začasne uredbe.
Determination of normal value for all cooperating producers not granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za vse sodelujoče proizvajalce, katerim ni bila odobrena TGO
One user-organisation objected to the use of the United States of America (‘USA’) as analogue country, in the meaning of recital 12 of the provisional Regulation.
Eno združenje uporabnikov je nasprotovalo uporabi Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“) kot primerljive države v smislu uvodne izjave 12 začasne uredbe.
This interested party did not substantiate its claim or provide any evidence, but referred rather generally to an alleged lack of competition on the USA market, due to anti-dumping measures in force there.
Ta zainteresirana stranka ni utemeljila svojega ugovora ali predložila kakršnih koli dokazil, ampak se je na splošno sklicevala na domnevno pomanjkanje konkurence na trgu ZDA zaradi tam veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
However, it is noted that the level of competition in the domestic market of the USA was investigated for the provisional determination.
Vendar se opozarja, da se je v okviru začasne določitve proučila raven konkurence na domačem trgu ZDA.
As mentioned in recital 37 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that there was indeed a fair level of competition on the USA domestic market.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 37 začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je raven konkurence na notranjem trgu ZDA v resnici zadostna.
One unrelated importer objected to the use of the USA as analogue country since the producer in the USA, whose data have been used for the determination of normal value, was related to a Community producer.
En nepovezan uvoznik je nasprotoval uporabi ZDA kot primerljive države, ker je proizvajalec v ZDA, katerega podatki so se uporabili za določitev normalne vrednosti, povezan s proizvajalcem Skupnosti.
It should be noted that during the investigation period (‘IP’), no such relationship existed.
Treba je opozoriti, da med obdobjem preiskave („OP“) ni bilo nobene takšne povezave.
Furthermore, this importer did not submit any information or evidence that this relationship which started only after the IP had an influence on the domestic costs and prices in the USA during the IP.
Poleg tega ta uvoznik ni predložil nobenih informacij ali dokazov o tem, da je ta povezava, ki je bila vzpostavljena šele po OP, vplivala na domače stroške in cene v ZDA med OP.
The unrelated importer’s argument had therefore to be rejected.
Argument tega nepovezanega uvoznika je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
Given the above, the choice of the USA as an analogue country is hereby confirmed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se potrdi izbira ZDA kot primerljive države.
In the absence of any comments, the contents of recital 60 of the provisional Regulation, concerning the determination of the export price, is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 60 začasne uredbe glede določanja izvozne cene.
The exporting producers noted that for the calculation of the provisional dumping margin, ocean freight and insurance costs were erroneously deducted from the export sales transactions made on a free on board (fob) or cost and freight (cfr) basis, whereas the sales price of these transactions did not include such costs.
Proizvajalci izvozniki so opozorili, da so se pri izračunu začasne stopnje dampinga od transakcij izvozne prodaje na podlagi cen franko ladje (FOB) ali stroški in prevoznina (CFR) pomotoma odšteli stroški pomorskega prevoza in zavarovanja, medtem ko v prodajnih cenah teh transakcij ti stroški niso bili vključeni.
These export sales transactions were corrected accordingly.
Te izvozno-prodajne transakcije so bile ustrezno popravljene.
Furthermore, it was found that one exporting producer did not report commissions paid to traders for export sales of the product concerned to the Community.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da en proizvajalec izvoznik ni prijavil provizije, plačane trgovcem za izvozno prodajo zadevnega izdelka Skupnosti.
The export prices were therefore adjusted accordingly.
Izvozne cene so bile zato ustrezno popravljene.
Apart from the adjustments made, as set out in recitals 9, 10 and 18 of this Regulation, and in the absence of any further comments, the contents of recitals 61 to 66 of the provisional Regulation in relation to the comparison of normal value and export prices, is hereby confirmed.
Razen popravkov, določenih v uvodnih izjavah 9, 10 in 18 te uredbe, in glede na to, da ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve opisane v uvodnih izjavah 61 do 66 začasne uredbe glede primerjave normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen.
In the light of the above corrections, the dumping margins finally determined, expressed as a percentage of the cost, insurance and freight (cif) Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Glede na zgoraj navedene popravke so končno določene stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene stroškov, zavarovanja in prevoznine (CIF) meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, naslednje:
All other companies
Vse ostale družbe
Community industry and Community consumption
Industrija Skupnosti in poraba Skupnosti
In the absence of any comments in this particular respect, the contents of recitals 72 to 74 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker s tem v zvezi ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 72 do 74 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, one cooperating exporting producer reiterated its claim that the higher prices charged by the Community industry are due to the higher reactivity of its products.
Po začasnem razkritju je en sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik večkrat ugovarjal, da industrija Skupnosti zaračunava višje cene zaradi višje reaktivnosti njenih izdelkov.
This request for an adjustment to the prices of the Community industry in respect of differences in reactivity had been rejected at the provisional stage, as indicated in recital 80 of the provisional Regulation.
Ta zahteva za prilagoditev cenam industrije Skupnosti zaradi razlik v reaktivnosti je bila začasno zavrnjena, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 80 začasne uredbe.
Although the claim was not sufficiently substantiated by the submission of new information, the issue was further examined, since the exporting producer claimed that differences in reactivity, alleged to be a characteristic present in all grades of the barium carbonate, should not have been assessed only in respect of the most reactive grades sold by the Community industry, as was done at the provisional stage.
Čeprav ugovor s predložitvijo novih podatkov ni bil dovolj utemeljen, se je primer nadalje proučil, saj je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da se razlike v reaktivnosti, ki naj bi bila domnevno lastnost vseh stopenj barijevega karbonata, ne bi smele ocenjevati samo pri najbolj reaktivnih stopnjah, ki jih prodaja industrija Skupnosti, kot je bilo to prvotno storjeno.
Since reactivity is a property of barium carbonate which is not shown as such on the producers’ production specification sheets, but can be inferred on the basis of the particle size and density of the ‘product concerned’, it is normal practice in the different end-use sectors to carry out control tests upon the delivery of the product to verify its properties.
Reaktivnost je lastnost barijevega karbonata, ki kot taka ni razvidna iz proizvodnih specifikacij proizvajalcev, temveč se lahko ugotovi na podlagi velikosti delcev in gostote zadevnega izdelka, zato je v različnih sektorjih končne uporabe običajen postopek, da izdelek ob dostavi testirajo in preverijo njegove lastnosti.
The fact that end-users in a sector such as the bricks and tiles industry, where reactivity is crucial, increase the quantity of barium carbonate they would normally need for their production process when they are using the product imported from the PRC, as opposed to that sourced from the Community industry, indicates that end-users attribute higher reactivity to the barium carbonate produced by the Community industry.
Dejstvo, da končni uporabniki v sektorju kot je industrija opeke in ploščic, kjer je reaktivnost bistvenega pomena, povečujejo količino barijevega karbonata, ki bi ga običajno potrebovali za proizvodni proces, kadar uporabljajo izdelek, uvožen iz LRK, v nasprotju z izdelkom, nabavljenim pri industriji Skupnosti, kaže na to, da končni uporabniki pripisujejo višjo reaktivnost barijevemu karbonatu, ki ga proizvaja industrija Skupnosti.
Moreover, a further analysis of the products sold in the Community market has shown that, in addition to the most reactive grades which represent less than 5 % of its sales in the EC, as referred to in recital 80 of the provisional Regulation, the Community industry in fact sold additional grades with considerably high reactivity, which accounted for about a further 20 % of its total sales in the Community.
Poleg tega je nadaljnja analiza izdelkov, prodanih na trgu Skupnosti, pokazala, da je industrija Skupnosti poleg najbolj reaktivnih stopenj, ki predstavljajo 5 % njene prodaje v ES, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 80 začasne uredbe, dejansko prodajala dodatne stopnje s precej visoko reaktivnostjo, katerih delež znaša dodatnih približno 20 % njene skupne prodaje v Skupnosti.
The balance of the Community industry’s sales are accounted for by sales of lower reactivity grades.
V prodajni bilanci industrije Skupnosti se je upoštevala prodaja izdelkov z nižjimi stopnjami reaktivnosti.
It was therefore concluded that, under these circumstances and contrary to the contents of recital 80 of the provisional Regulation, an adjustment for differences in reactivity was warranted.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je glede na te okoliščine in v nasprotju z uvodno izjavo 80 začasne uredbe, prilagoditev zaradi razlik v reaktivnosti upravičena.
For the purpose of analysing price undercutting, the selling price of the Community industry’s grades of barium carbonate with high reactivity was reduced by 14 %.
Za namen analiziranja nelojalnega nižanja cen se je prodajna cena stopenj barijevega karbonata z visoko reaktivnostjo, ki jih proizvaja industrija Skupnosti, znižala za 14 %.
This adjustment was based on the price difference between higher and lower reactivity grades sold by the Community industry.
Prilagoditev je temeljila na razliki v ceni med višjimi in nižjimi stopnjami, ki jih prodaja industrija Skupnosti.
The comparison showed that, during the IP, the product concerned originating in the PRC was sold in the Community at prices which undercut those of the Community industry by 20 to 26 %, when expressed as a percentage of the latter.
Primerjava je pokazala, da se je med OP zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz LRK v Skupnosti prodajal po cenah, ki so bile nižje od cen izdelkov industrije Skupnosti za 20 % do 26 %, izraženih v odstotkih slednjih.
Apart from the adjustments made as set out in recital 25 of this Regulation, and in the absence of any other comments, the contents of recitals 75 to 81 of the provisional Regulation concerning imports from the country concerned is confirmed.
Razen prilagoditev, določenih v uvodni izjavi 25 te uredbe, se glede na to, da ni bilo dodatnih pripomb, ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav 75 do 81 začasne uredbe glede uvoza iz zadevne države, potrdijo.
Situation of the Community industry and conclusion on injury
Razmere industrije Skupnosti in sklep o škodi
It was submitted by one cooperating exporter that the economic indicators analysed in recitals 84 to 94 of the provisional Regulation did not show material injury.
Eden od sodelujočih izvoznikov je predložil ugovor, da gospodarski kazalniki, analizirani v uvodnih izjavah 84 do 94 začasne uredbe, niso izkazovali znatne škode.