natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, the comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the previous investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation's IP, expressed as a percentage of the cif price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, showed dumping for the imports of coumarin to the Community from Indonesia.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določene v prejšnji preiskavi, ter tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen v OP te preiskave, izraženih kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, pokazala damping za uvoz kumarina iz Indonezije v Skupnost.
The dumping margin found, expressed as a percentage of the cif price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, was above 100 %.
Ugotovljena stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, je bila višja od 100 %.
In order to determine whether evidence of dumping could be found with respect to the exports of coumarin from Malaysia to the Community during the IP, Eurostat data were used pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Da bi ugotovili, ali je mogoče najti dokaze za damping v zvezi z zadevnim izvozom kumarina iz Malezije v Skupnost v OP, so bili uporabljeni podatki Eurostata v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 2(11) and 2(12) of the basic Regulation, the comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the previous investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation's IP, expressed as a percentage of the cif price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, showed dumping for the imports of coumarin to the Community from Malaysia.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določene v prejšnji preiskavi, ter tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen v OP te preiskave, izraženih kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, pokazala damping za uvoz kumarina iz Malezije v Skupnost.
In view of the above findings of circumvention within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the existing anti-dumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC should be extended to the same product consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or Malaysia or not.
Glede na zgoraj navedene ugotovitve o izogibanju v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe je treba obstoječe protidampinške ukrepe na uvoz zadevnega proizvoda s poreklom iz LRK razširiti na enake proizvode, poslane iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali Malezije ali ne.
The duty extended should be the one established in Article 1(2) of the original Regulation.
Razširjena dajatev mora biti dajatev, določena v členu 1(2) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provide that any extended measures shall be applied against registered imports from the date of registration, the anti-dumping duty should be collected on imports of coumarin consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, which entered the Community under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation.
V skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določata, da se razširjeni ukrepi uporabljajo za registrirani uvoz od dneva registracije, je treba protidampinško dajatev pobrati na uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ki je vstopil v Skupnost z registracijo, ki jo je uvedla začetna uredba.
Although during this investigation no genuine producer of coumarin was found to exist in Indonesia or Malaysia or made itself known to the Commission, new producers which would consider lodging a request for an exemption from the extended anti-dumping measure pursuant to Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation are informed that they will be required to complete a questionnaire in order to enable the Commission to determine whether an exemption may be warranted.
Čeprav v času te preiskave ni bil dokazan obstoj nobenega dejanskega proizvajalca kumarina v Indoneziji ali Malezije in se noben takšen izvoznik ni javil Komisiji, bodo morali novi proizvajalci, ki nameravajo predložiti zahtevek za izvzetje od razširjene protidampinške dajatve v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe, izpolniti vprašalnik, da bo Komisija lahko ugotovila, ali je izvzetje utemeljeno.
Such exemption may be granted after the assessment of, for instance, the market situation of the product concerned, production capacity and capacity utilisation, procurement and sales and the likelihood of continuation of practices for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification and the evidence of dumping.
Tako izvzetje se lahko odobri po oceni, na primer, razmer na trgu zadevnega proizvoda, proizvodne zmogljivosti in izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, naročil in prodaje, verjetnosti nadaljevanja praks, za katere ni zadostno upravičenih razlogov ali gospodarske utemeljitve, ter dokazov o dampingu.
The Commission would normally also carry out an on the spot verification visit.
Komisija ponavadi izvede tudi preveritveni obisk na kraju samem.
The request would have to be addressed to the Commission forthwith, with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production and sales.
Zahtevek je treba nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo, in sicer z vsemi pomembnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe, povezane s proizvodnjo in prodajo.
Importers could still benefit from exemption from the measures to the extent that their imports are from exporting producers, which are granted such an exemption, and in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Uvozniki so lahko še vedno upravičeni do izvzetja ukrepov, če uvažajo od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je takšno izvzetje odobreno, in je v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
Where an exemption is warranted, the Council will amend this Regulation accordingly.
V primeru utemeljenega izvzetja bo Svet to uredbo ustrezno spremenil.
Subsequently, any exemption granted will be monitored by the Commission to ensure compliance with the conditions set therein.
Nato bo Komisija spremljala vsa odobrena izvzetja, da se zagotovi skladnost s pogoji, določenimi v tej uredbi.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Council intended to extend the definitive anti-dumping measures in force and were given the opportunity to comment and to be heard.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je Svet nameraval razširiti veljavne dokončne protidampinške ukrepe, dana pa jim je bila tudi možnost, da predložijo pripombe in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
No comments which were of a nature to change the above mentioned conclusions were received,
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb, zaradi katerih bi se spremenili zgoraj navedeni sklepi –
The definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 on imports of coumarin, falling within CN code ex29322100 originating in the People's Republic of China is hereby extended to imports of coumarin, falling within CN code ex29322100 consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or Malaysia or not (TARIC code 2932210016).
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002 na uvoz kumarina, uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex29322100, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se razširi na uvoz kumarina, uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex29322100, poslanega iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali Malezije ali ne (oznaka TARIC 2932210016).
The duty extended by paragraph 1 shall be collected on imports registered in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 499/2006 and Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Dajatev, razširjena z odstavkom 1, se pobere za uvoz, registriran v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 499/2006 in členoma 13(3) in 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96.
The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabljajo veljavne carinske določbe.
Requests for exemption from the duty extended by Article 1 shall be made in writing in one of the official languages of the European Union and must be signed by a person authorised to represent the applicant.
Zahtevki za izvzetje iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, se predložijo v pisni obliki v enem od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije in jih podpiše oseba, pooblaščena za zastopanje vložnika.
Fax (32 2) 295 65 05
Telefaks (32 2) 295 65 05
In accordance with Article 13(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the Council may decide to exempt imports which do not circumvent the anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 from the duty extended by Article 1.
V skladu s členom 13(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko Svet odobri izvzetje dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, za uvoz, ki se ne izogiba protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 499/2006.
Carinskim organom se naroči, da ustavijo registracijo uvoza, določeno v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 499/2006.
OJ L 91, 29.3.2006, p. 3.
UL L 91, 29.3.2006, str. 3.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1651/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1651/2006
terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
The measures currently in force are definitive anti-dumping duties imposed on imports of bicycles originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China (PRC) by Council Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 [2] (the original regulation).
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi za uvoz koles s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Skupnost so dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1524/2000 [2] („prvotna uredba“).
On 10 January 2006, the Commission initiated by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], on its own initiative, an investigation pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 10. januarja 2006 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], na lastno pobudo začela preiskavo v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The interim review is limited in scope to dumping aspects as far as one exporting producer of bicycles, Giant China Co. Ltd. (Giant China or the company) is concerned.
Vmesni pregled je omejen na vidike dampinga v zvezi z enim proizvajalcem izvoznikom koles, Giant China Co. Ltd. („Giant China“ ali „družba“).
There was sufficient prima facie evidence available to the Commission that the circumstances on the basis of which the existing measures were established have changed and that these changes were of a lasting nature.
Komisiji so bili na voljo zadostni prima facie dokazi, o tem, da so bile okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni ukrepi, spremenile, in da so spremembe trajne narave.
The information at the Commission's disposal indicated that market economy conditions prevail for the company as demonstrated by the fact that it appeared to fulfil the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Informacije, ki so bile na voljo Komisiji, so pokazale, da za družbo veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, kar je razvidno iz dejstva, da izpolnjuje merila, določena v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The partial interim review was therefore initiated with a view to determine whether the company operates under market economy conditions as defined in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation or alternatively whether the company fulfils the requirements to have an individual duty established in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation and, if so, to determine the company's individual margin of dumping and, should dumping be found, the level of the duty to which its imports of the product concerned into the Community should be subject.
Namen delnega vmesnega pregleda je bil ugotoviti, ali družba opravlja dejavnost pod pogoji tržnega gospodarstva, kakor določa člen 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, oziroma ali družba izpolnjuje zahteve za določitev individualne dajatve v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe in, če je tako, da se za družbo določi individualna stopnja dampinga, ter če je ta ugotovljen, za določitev stopnje dajatve na uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
The Commission officially advised Giant China, the Community industry and the authorities of the PRC of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je družbo Giant China, industrijo Skupnosti in organe v LRK uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In order to allow the company to submit a claim for market economy treatment (MET) or individual treatment (IT), the Commission sent claim forms to the company and to the authorities of the PRC.
Da bi družba lahko predložila zahtevek za tržno-gospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), je Komisija družbi in organom v LRK poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Subsequently, claims for MET were received from Giant China and its related company.
Pozneje sta bila prejeta zahtevka za TGO, ki sta jih vložili Giant China in njena povezana družba.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of Giant China and its related company Giant Chengdu Co. Ltd.
Preveritveni obisk je bil izveden v prostorih Giant China in njene povezane družbe Giant Chengdu Co., Ltd.
The product concerned is, as defined in Article 1 of the original regulation, bicycles and other cycles (including delivery tricycles, but excluding unicycles), not motorised originating in the PRC (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN codes ex87120010, 87120030 and ex87120080.
Zadevni izdelek, kot je opredeljen v členu 1 prvotne uredbe, so kolesa in druga kolesa (vključno z dostavnimi tricikli, vendar brez enokoles) brez motorja, s poreklom iz LRK, („zadevni izdelek“) trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex87120010, 87120030 in ex87120080.
The investigation covered the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005.
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2005.
It was found during the investigation that the company was related to another manufacturer of the product concerned in the PRC, which did, however, not submit a reply to the MET claim form within the deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Med preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo podjetje povezano z drugim proizvajalcem zadevnega izdelka v LRK, ki pa v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku, ni izpolnil zahtevka za TGO.
It has to be noted that it is the Commission's consistent practice to examine whether a group of related companies, as a whole, fulfils the conditions for MET.
Opozoriti je treba, da je ustaljena praksa Komisije, da ugotovi, ali skupina povezanih družb kot celota izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
This is deemed to be necessary to avoid that sales of a group of companies are channelled via one of the related companies in the group, should measures be imposed.
V primeru uvedbe ukrepov, se to šteje za nujno, da se skupini proizvajalcev prepreči prodaja preko ene od povezanih družb.
Therefore, in cases where a subsidiary or any other related company is a producer and/or a seller of the product concerned, all such related companies have to provide a reply to the MET claim form in order that an examination can be made as to whether they also meet the criteria set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato morajo v primerih, ko je odvisna ali katera koli druga povezana družba proizvajalec in/ali prodajalec zadevnega izdelka, vse tako povezane družne izpolniti zahtevek za TGO, da se prouči, ali tudi te družbe izpolnjujejo merila, določena v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, failure in that respect leads to the result that it cannot be established that the group, as a whole, fulfils all the conditions for MET.
Če ta pogoj ni izpolnjen, ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali skupina kot celota, izpolnjuje pogoje za TGO.
Furthermore, no determination as to whether the company fulfilled the requirements of Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation could be made as the facts available did not allow for such a determination.
Ker razpoložljiva dejstva ne dopuščajo take določitve, ni mogoče določiti, ali družba izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The company was informed by the Commission of the above conclusions.
Komisija je družbo obvestila o zgornjih sklepih.
It declared its intention to no longer cooperate in this review proceeding.
Družba je izjavila, da v postopkih zadevnega pregleda nima več namena sodelovati.
In light of the above, it is concluded that the partial interim review concerning imports into the Community of the product concerned produced by Giant China should be terminated and the measures as described in recital 1 should be maintained,
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da se delni vmesni pregled v zvezi z uvozom zadevnega izdelka, ki ga izdeluje Giant China, v Skupnost zaključi, in da se ukrepi, navedeni v uvodni izjavi (1) ohranijo –
The partial interim review, pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, with regard to the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of bicycles produced by Giant China Co. Ltd. and originating in the People's Republic of China by virtue of Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005, is hereby terminated.
Delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 v zvezi s protidampinškimi ukrepi, uvedenimi z Uredbo (ES) št. 1524/2000, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1095/2005, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles, ki jih izdeluje Giant China Co. Ltd., s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, se zaključi.
The anti-dumping measures currently in force with regard to Giant China Co. Ltd. are maintained.
Trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi v zvezi z družbo Giant China Co. Ltd. se ohranijo.
OJ C 5, 10.1.2006, p. 2.
UL C 5, 10.1.2006, str. 2.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1652/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1652/2006
terminating the new exporter review of Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of synthetic staple fibres of polyesters originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China
o zaključku pregleda zaradi novega izvoznika v okviru Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz sintetičnih rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom, med drugim, iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] the ‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 11(4) Uredbe,
The measures currently in force on imports into the Community of polyester staple fibres (‘PSF’) originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’) are definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 [2].
Trenutno veljavni ukrepi za uvoz rezanih vlaken iz poliestra („RVP“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Skupnost so dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 [2].
After the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of PSF originating in the PRC, the Commission received a request to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review of Regulation (EC) No 428/2005, pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, from the Chinese company Huvis Sichuan (the applicant).
Po uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz RVP s poreklom iz LRK je Komisija v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe od kitajske družbe Huvis Sichuan (v nadaljevanju „vložnik“) prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda zaradi „novega izvoznika“ v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2005.
The applicant claimed that it had not exported the product concerned to the Community during the period of investigation on which the anti-dumping measures were based, i.e. the period from 1 January to 31 December 2003 (the original investigation period) and that it was not related to any of the exporting producers of PSF in the PRC subject to the anti-dumping measures in force.
Vložnik je trdil, da v obdobju preiskave, na podlagi katerega so bili uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi, to je od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2003 („prvotno obdobje preiskave“), v Skupnost ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka in da ni povezan z nobenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom RVP iz LRK, za katerega veljajo trenutno veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Furthermore, it claimed that it had started to export PSF to the Community after the end of the original investigation period.
Vložnik je tudi trdil, da je začel RVP v Skupnost izvažati po koncu prvotnega obdobja preiskave.
Initiation of a ‘new exporter’ review
Začetek pregleda zaradi „novega izvoznika“
The Commission examined the prima facie evidence submitted by the applicant and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila prima facie dokaze, ki jih je predložil vložnik, in ugotovila, da so zadostni za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
After consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Community industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EC) No 342/2006 [3], a review of Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 with regard to the applicant and commenced its investigation.
Potem, ko se je Komisija posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom in dala zadevni industriji Skupnosti možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (ES) št. 342/2006 [3] začela pregled Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005 v zvezi z vložnikom in uvedla preiskavo.
Pursuant to Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 342/2006, an anti-dumping duty of 49,7 % imposed by Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 on imports of PSF produced, inter alia, by the applicant was repealed.
V skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 342/2006 je bila protidampinška dajatev v višini 49,7 %, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 428/2005 na uvoz RVP, ki ga je, med drugim, proizvajal vložnik, razveljavljena.
Simultaneously, pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, customs authorities were directed to take appropriate steps to register the imports of PSF produced by the applicant.
Hkrati so carinski organi v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe dobili navodilo, da izvedejo ustrezne ukrepe za registracijo uvoza RVP, ki ga je proizvedel vložnik.
The product concerned by the current review is the same as that in the investigation that led to the imposition of the measures in force on imports of PSF originating in, inter alia, the PRC (original investigation), i.e. synthetic staple fibres of polyesters, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently classifiable within CN code 55032000.
Zadevni izdelek sedanje preiskava je isti kot izdelek iz preiskave, na podlagi katere so bili uvedeni veljavni ukrepi za uvoz RVP s poreklom, med drugim, iz LRK („prvotna preiskava“), tj. sintetična rezana vlakna iz poliestra, nemikana, nečesana ali drugače pripravljena za predenje, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN 55032000.
The Commission officially advised the Community industry, the applicant and the representatives of the exporting country of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je industrijo Skupnosti, vložnika in predstavnike države izvoznice uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda.