natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They can either be used without any other part and fixed into the wood (wood screws) or metal sheets (self-tapping screws) or be combined with a nut and washers to form a bolt.
Lahko se uporabljajo brez kakršnega koli drugega dela in pritrdijo v les (lesni vijaki) ali kovinske plošče (samorezni vijaki) ali se kombinirajo z matico in podložkami, da oblikujejo sornik.
Screws may have a variety of head shapes (cup, socket, flat, hexagonal, etc.), shank lengths and diameters.
Vijaki imajo lahko različne oblike glav (čašasto, udrto, plosko, šesterokotno itd.), dolžine pecljev in premere.
The shank may be totally or partially threaded.
Pecelj je lahko v celoti ali deloma izrezan z navoji.
SSF are used by a variety of consumer industries and in a wide range of final applications where resistance to both atmospheric and chemical corrosion is necessary and where hygiene may also be essential, such as equipment for processing and storing food products, plants in the chemical industry, manufacture of medical equipment, public lighting equipment, shipbuilding, etc.
Pritrdilni elementi iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovi deli se uporabljajo v različnih potrošniških panogah in v širokem razponu končnih aplikacij, kjer je potrebna odpornost proti rjavenju zaradi vplivov ozračja in kemičnih vplivov in kjer je morda bistvena tudi higiena, kot so oprema za obdelavo in shranjevanje prehrambnih izdelkov, oprema v kemični industriji, izdelava medicinske opreme, oprema javne razsvetljave, ladjedelništvo itd.
SSF, i.e. bolts, nuts and screws of stainless steel which are used to mechanically join two or more elements, are normally declared within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561, 73181570 and 73181630.
Pritrdilni elementi iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovi deli, tj. sorniki, matice in vijaki iz nerjavnega jekla, ki se uporabljajo za mehanično združevanje dveh ali več elementov, so običajno prijavljeni pod oznakami KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561, 73181570 in 73181630.
There are many types of SSF, each one being defined by its specific physical and technical characteristics and by the grade of stainless steel from which it is made.
Tipov pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov je precej, vsak pa je opredeljen s svojimi posebnimi fizičnimi in tehničnimi lastnostmi ter razredom nerjavnega jekla, iz katerega je izdelan.
In the course of the investigation, it was alleged by importers and by a German importer/distributor association that nuts should be excluded from the scope of the investigation, because of an alleged lack of production in the Community.
Med preiskavo so uvozniki in nemško združenje uvoznikov oziroma distributerjev navedli, da bi bilo treba matice zaradi domnevnega pomanjkanja proizvodnje v Skupnosti izvzeti iz obsega preiskave.
This issue was considered.
To vprašanje je bilo obravnavano.
In the course of the provisional investigation, doubts arose as to whether nuts could indeed be regarded as a single product with other SSF.
Med začasno preiskavo so se pojavili dvomi, ali bi lahko matice zares obravnavali kot samostojen izdelek med drugimi pritrdilnimi elementi iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovimi deli.
In this respect, a number of aspects need to be explored further, e.g. whether and to what extent bolts and nuts are marketed together as a system, to what extent these types are developed together etc. Further examination will also be needed to what extent the producers in the Community are able to offer these systems.
V zvezi s tem je treba dodatno raziskati številne vidike, npr. ali in koliko se sorniki in matice tržijo skupaj kot sistem, koliko se ti tipi razvijajo skupaj itd. Dodatno bo treba proučiti tudi, koliko so proizvajalci v Skupnosti zmožni ponuditi te sisteme.
On this basis, it was provisionally decided not to include nuts normally declared within CN code 73181630 in the definition of the product concerned.
Na tej podlagi je bilo začasno odločeno, da matice, ki so običajno prijavljene pod oznako KN 73181630, ne bodo vključene v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
In this respect, it is pertinent to note that virtually all imports from the Philippines appear to consist of nuts.
V zvezi s tem je primerno omeniti, da celoten uvoz iz Filipinov pravzaprav zajema matice.
Therefore, should it be decided at the definitive stage of the investigation that nuts are to be excluded from the product scope, the proceeding will have to be terminated with regard to the Philippines.
Če bo torej na določeni stopnji preiskave odločeno, da matice ne bodo vključene v obseg izdelka, bo treba postopek v zvezi s Filipini zaključiti.
It was further claimed by importers and the German importer/distributor association that the product scope should be limited to CN codes 73181561 and 73181570, i.e. hexagon socket head screws of stainless steel and hexagon bolts of stainless steel, because there is no sufficient production of all other kinds of SSF in the Community.
Uvozniki in nemško združenje uvoznikov/distributerjev so še trdili, da bi bilo treba obseg izdelka omejiti na oznaki KN 73181561 in 73181570, tj. vijake iz nerjavnega jekla s šesterokotno udrto glavo in šesterokotne sornike iz nerjavnega jekla, ker v Skupnosti proizvodnja vseh drugih vrst pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov ni bila zadostna.
However, the investigation confirmed that these other types of SSF are produced in the Community.
Vendar pa je preiskava potrdila, da se ti drugi tipi pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov proizvajajo v Skupnosti.
Thus, the claim could not be accepted.
Tako zahtevka ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
It was found that all types, other than nuts, fall under the broad definition of fasteners and have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, the same basic uses and the same distribution channels.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so razen matic vsi tipi zajeti pod široko opredelitvijo pritrdilnih elementov in imajo enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti, enake osnovne načine uporabe in enake distribucijske poti.
Consequently, all different types of SSF, with the exception of nuts, normally declared within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 and 73181570 originating in the PRC, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam form provisionally one product for the purpose of the present investigation (the product concerned).
Zato vsi različni tipi pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov, razen matic, ki so običajno prijavljene pod oznakami KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 in 73181570 in so s poreklom iz LRK, Indonezije, Malezije, Tajvana, Tajske in Vietnama, za namen te preiskave začasno tvorijo en sam izdelek („zadevni izdelek“).
The Commission found that any SSF produced and sold on the respective domestic markets in the PRC, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam and those exported to the Community from the countries concerned as well as those produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry have the same physical, chemical and technical characteristics and uses.
Komisija je ugotovila, da imajo vsi pritrdilni elementi iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovi deli, proizvedeni in prodani na ustreznih domačih trgih v LRK, Indoneziji, Maleziji, Tajvanu, na Tajskem in v Vietnamu, in tisti, ki so iz zadevnih držav izvoženi v Skupnost, ter tisti, ki jih v Skupnosti proizvede in proda industrija Skupnosti, enake fizične, kemične in tehnične značilnosti ter načine uporabe.
It is therefore provisionally concluded that all are like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno sklene, da so vsi ti izdelki podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
SAMPLING
VZORČENJE
Sampling for exporting producers in the PRC and Taiwan
Vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in Tajvanu
In view of the large number of exporting producers in the PRC and Taiwan, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Tajvanu je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and/or selling of the product concerned.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, se je od proizvajalcev izvoznikov zahtevalo, da se v 15 dneh od dneva začetka preiskave javijo ter zagotovijo osnovne informacije o svojem izvozu in domači prodaji, natančen opis svojih dejavnostih glede proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka ter imenih in dejavnostih vseh svojih povezanih družb, udeleženih v proizvodnji in/ali prodaji zadevnega izdelka.
The authorities in the PRC and Taiwan were also consulted.
Komisija se je posvetovala tudi z organi oblasti v LRK in Tajvanu.
Pre-selection of cooperating exporting producers
Predizbira sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov
Only two exporting producers in the PRC came forward and provided the requested information within the three weeks period set by Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
V LRK sta se odzvala samo dva proizvajalca izvoznika in zagotovila zahtevane informacije v tritedenskem roku, določenem v členu 17(2) osnovne uredbe.
In these circumstances, the Commission decided that sampling was not necessary for exporting producers in the PRC.
V teh okoliščinah se je Komisija odločila, da vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK ni potrebno.
Forty nine companies in Taiwan came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline set by Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
V Tajvanu se je odzvalo devetinštirideset podjetij in zagotovilo zahtevane informacije v roku, določenem v členu 17(2) osnovne uredbe.
However, only 37 exporting producers reported exports to the Community during the investigation period.
Vendar pa je med obdobjem preiskave le sedemintrideset proizvajalcev izvoznikov prijavilo izvoz v Skupnost.
Those exporting producers that exported the product concerned to the Community during the investigation period and expressed a wish to participate in the sample, were initially considered as cooperating companies and were taken into account in the selection of the sample.
Tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, ki so med obdobjem preiskave izvažali zadevni izdelek v Skupnost in izrazili željo po sodelovanju v vzorcu, se je na začetku obravnavalo kot sodelujoča podjetja in se jih je upoštevalo pri izbiri vzorca.
Eleven out of the 12 remaining companies were either traders or exporting producers without exports to the Community during the investigation period.
Enajst od preostalih dvanajstih podjetij so bili trgovci ali proizvajalci izvozniki, ki med obdobjem preiskave niso izvažali v Skupnost.
Therefore, these companies cannot be taken into account for the purposes of a dumping calculation.
Zato teh podjetij ni mogoče upoštevati za izračun dampinga.
It should finally be noted that one of the remaining 12 companies was an exclusive exporting producer of nuts and is consequently not concerned by the provisional measures.
Na koncu je treba omeniti, da je bilo eno od preostalih dvanajstih podjetij ekskluzivni proizvajalec izvoznik matic in ga začasni ukrepi zato niso zadevali.
The cooperating exporting producers represented around 78 % of total exports of the product concerned from Taiwan to the Community.
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki so predstavljali okrog 78 % celotnega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Tajvana v Skupnost.
Exporting producers which did not make themselves known within the aforesaid period were considered as non-cooperating with the investigation.
Za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki se v zgoraj omenjenem obdobju niso javili, je veljalo, da pri preiskavi ne sodelujejo.
Selection of the sample
Izbira vzorca
According to Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the selection was based on the largest representative volume of exports, which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je izbira temeljila na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu izvoza, ki bi ga bilo mogoče razumno preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
On this basis, five Taiwanese exporting producers were selected for the sample.
Na tej podlagi je bilo za vzorec izbranih pet tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The selected companies represented around 47 % of Taiwanese exports to the Community and around 57 % of domestic sales in Taiwan.
Izbrana podjetja so predstavljala okrog 47 % tajvanskega izvoza v Skupnosti in okrog 57 % domače prodaje v Tajvanu.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the Taiwanese authorities were consulted and raised no objection.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe se je posvetovalo s tajvanskimi oblastmi in te niso imele nobenega ugovora.
The thirty two cooperating exporting producers, which were not finally retained in the sample, were informed through the Taiwanese authorities that any anti-dumping duty on their exports would be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Dvaintrideset sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki na koncu niso bili obdržani v vzorcu, je bilo prek tajvanskih oblasti obveščenih, da se bo protidampinška dajatev za njihov izvoz izračunala v skladu z določbami člena 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
Questionnaires were sent for completion to all five sampled companies and replies from all of them were received within the given deadlines.
Vsem petim v vzorcu zajetim podjetjem so bili poslani vprašalniki za izpolnitev in odgovore vseh petih je Komisija prejela v danih rokih.
Individual examination
Individualna preiskava
Two exporting producers in Taiwan which have not been included in the sample have claimed an individual dumping margin and duty rate, if any, with a view to the application of Articles 9(6) and 17(3) of the basic Regulation.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika v Tajvanu, ki nista bila vključena v vzorec, sta zahtevala individualno stopnjo dampinga in stopnjo morebitne dajatve glede na uporabo členov 9(6) in 17(3) osnovne uredbe.
In view of the large number of countries and parties involved and the time constraints, the Commission concluded that no individual examination of exporting producers in Taiwan could be granted because this would be unduly burdensome and would prevent completion of the investigation in good time.
Glede na veliko udeleženih držav in strank ter časovnih omejitev je Komisija sklenila, da proizvajalcem izvoznikom na Tajskem ni mogoče odobriti individualne preiskave, ker bi bilo to preveč obremenilno in bi preprečilo pravočasen zaključek preiskave.
Furthermore, it should be noted that one of the exporting producers requesting such individual examination was only producing nuts, which, as stated above, are provisionally excluded from the scope of this proceeding.
Poleg tega je treba omeniti, da je eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki sta zahtevala takšno individualno preiskavo, izdeloval le matice, ki so, kakor je navedeno zgoraj, začasno izločene iz obsega tega postopka.
Sampling of Community producers
Vzorčenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti
In view of the large number of Community producers, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko proizvajalcev Skupnosti je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
For these purposes, the Commission requested Community producers to provide information concerning production and sales of the like product.
Zato je Komisija prosila proizvajalce Skupnosti, da zagotovijo informacije v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka.
Eight Community producers came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline set by Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation.
Odzvalo se je osem proizvajalcev Skupnosti in zagotovilo zahtevane informacije v roku, določenem v členu 17(2) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected four companies in two Member States, three in Italy and one in Germany, for the sample as they represented the largest representative volume of production in the Community (around 50 %), which could be reasonably investigated within the time available.
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe je Komisija za vzorec izbrala štiri podjetja v dveh državah članicah, tri v Italiji in eno v Nemčiji, saj so predstavljala največji reprezentativni obseg proizvodnje v Skupnosti (okrog 50 %), ki bi jih upravičeno bilo mogoče preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the association of Community producers was consulted and raised no objection.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe se je Komisija posvetovala z združenjem proizvajalcev Skupnosti in to ni imelo nobenega ugovora.
In addition, the remaining four producers, situated in Belgium, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom, were requested to provide certain general data for the injury analysis.
Poleg tega se je od preostalih štirih proizvajalcev, ki se nahajajo v Belgiji, Nemčiji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu, zahtevalo, da zagotovijo določene splošne podatke za analizo škode.
All sampled Community producers and two other Community producers cooperated and sent questionnaire replies within the deadlines.
Sodelovali so vsi v vzorcu zajeti proizvajalci Skupnosti in dva druga proizvajalca Skupnosti in v roku poslali odgovore na vprašalnik.
However, one of the two non-sampled cooperating companies was an exclusive producer of certain special nuts which have provisionally been excluded from the scope of the investigation and, therefore, this company was not considered further for the provisional findings.
Eno od dveh sodelujočih podjetij, ki nista bili zajeti v vzorcu, je bilo ekskluzivni proizvajalec določenih posebnih matic, začasno izvzetih iz obsega preiskave, zato se to podjetje ni več obravnavalo za začasne ugotovitve.
Sampling of Importers
Vzorčenje uvoznikov
In view of the large number of importers in the Community, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko uvoznikov v Skupnosti je bilo v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
For these purposes, the Commission requested importers to provide information concerning imports and sales of the product concerned.
Zato je Komisija pozvala uvoznike, naj zagotovijo informacije o uvozu in prodaji zadevnega izdelka.
On the basis of the information received, the Commission selected five importers in four Member States, two in Germany, one in Italy, one in Sweden and one in the United Kingdom, for the sample.
Na podlagi prejetih informacij je Komisija za vzorec izbrala pet uvoznikov v štirih državah članicah, dva v Nemčiji, enega v Italiji, enega na Švedskem in enega v Združenem kraljestvu.
Two known associations of importers were consulted.
Opravljena so bila posvetovanja z dvema znanima združenjema uvoznikov.
These importers represented the largest representative volume of sales of known importers in the Community (around 37 %), which could be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Ti uvozniki so predstavljali največji reprezentativni obseg prodaje znanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti (okrog 37 %), ki bi ga upravičeno bilo mogoče preiskati v razpoložljivem času.
Four importers cooperated and sent questionnaire replies.
Štirje uvozniki so sodelovali in poslali odgovore na vprašalnik.
The Swedish importer failed to cooperate further and only two importers provided complete replies with all information requested.
Švedski uvoznik sodelovanja ni nadaljeval, popolne odgovore z vsemi zahtevanimi informacijami pa sta prispevala le dva uvoznika.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC and Vietnam, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those exporting producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se pri protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom, s poreklom iz LRK in Vietnama, normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce izvoznike, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila, določena v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer je razvidno, da v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka prevladujejo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in a summarised form below:
Zgolj zaradi lažjega sklicevanja so ta merila na kratko povzeta spodaj:
business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions, and without significant State interference;
poslovne odločitve in stroški se oblikujejo kot odziv na tržne pogoje in brez večjega vmešavanja države;
accounting records are independently audited, in line with International Accounting Standards (IAS) and applied for all purposes;
računovodska dokumentacija se neodvisno revidira v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („IAS“) in uporablja za vse namene;
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
ni večjih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz prejšnjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva;
legal certainty and stability is provided by bankruptcy and property laws;
pravna gotovost in stabilnost se zagotavljata s stečajnim in premoženjskim pravom;
currency exchanges are carried out at the market rate.
menjave valut se izvajajo po tržni stopnji.
Two Chinese producers and one Vietnamese producer requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers within the given deadlines.
Dva kitajska in en vietnamski proizvajalec so v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe zahtevali MET, in v določenih rokih odgovorili na obrazec zahtevka za MET za proizvajalce izvoznike.
One Chinese producer was in a start-up phase and did not have either audited or any other sort of financial accounts.
En kitajski proizvajalec je bil v fazi zagona in ni imel nobenih revidiranih oziroma kakršnih koli drugih finančnih poročil.
The Commission concluded that the lack of such accounts prevents the determination on whether criteria 2 and 3 are met.
Komisija je menila, da pomanjkanje takšnih poročil preprečuje ugotovitev, ali sta izpolnjeni merili 2 in 3.
Consequently, it was concluded that the company did not meet the requirements for MET.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da podjetje ni izpolnjevalo zahtev za MET.
The company was informed accordingly and raised no objection.
Podjetje je bilo ustrezno obveščeno in ni podalo nobenega ugovora.
For the other Chinese exporting producer, the Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified all information submitted in the MET claim at the premises of the company in question.
Za drugega kitajskega proizvajalca izvoznika je Komisija poiskala vse informacije, ki so se zdele potrebne, in v prostorih zadevnega podjetja preverila vse informacije, predložene v zahtevku za MET.
The verification established that the company did not have one clear set of basic accounting records which are prepared and audited in line with IAS.
Preverjanje je pokazalo, da podjetje ni imelo niti enega popolnega kompleta osnovne računovodske dokumentacije, ki se pripravlja in revidira v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi.
Even though the accounts had been audited by independent external auditors, numerous problems and discrepancies persisted.
Čeprav so poročila revidirali neodvisni zunanji revizorji, so še naprej ostali številni problemi in neskladja.