natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to Italy, many investments planned at Cutro would not be necessary in the alternative solution because of the possibility of outsourcing the relevant operations (painting and engine testing) or of renting existing facilities (test track in the vicinity of Modena).
Po podatkih Italije številne naložbe, načrtovane za Cutro, na alternativnih lokacijah ne bi bile potrebne zaradi možnosti zunanje izvedbe zadevnih postopkov (lakiranje in testiranje motorja) ali dajanja v najem obstoječih obratov (testna steza v bližini Modene).
As regards painting of the sports cars, Italy provided an estimate of the cost of investing in a new paintshop at Modena to show that in-house painting at Modena would be cheaper than outsourcing and would therefore slightly increase the handicap at Cutro.
V zvezi z lakiranjem športnih avtomobilov je Italija podala oceno stroškov vlaganja v novo lakirnico v Modeni, da bi pokazala, da bi bilo interno lakiranje v Modeni ceneje kot če bi delo opravili zunanji izvajalci in bi se zato delno povečala prikrajšanost v Cutru.
As regards the engine test bench, Italy pointed out that the Cutro facility would also allow De Tomaso to develop specific versions of the engines for future productions.
V zvezi s preskusno napravo za motorje, je Italija opozorila na to, da bi obrat Cutro skupini De Tomaso tudi omogočil razvoj specifičnih verzij motorjev za prihodnje proizvodnje.
Regarding operating aspects of the CBA, Italy explained that the difference noted in headcounts was due partly to a mistake in the CBA, by which the number of managers and white collar workers was underestimated in the alternative solution, and partly to the fact that less labour would be needed at Modena since painting could be outsourced.
V zvezi z vidiki delovanja analize stroškov in koristi (CBA) je Italija pojasnila, da sta delna razloga za razliko, opisano v številu zaposlenih, napaka v analizi CBA, kjer je bilo število upravljavcev in uslužbencev za alternativno rešitev podcenjeno, in dejstvo, da bi bilo v Modeni potrebno manjše število delavcev, saj bi lakiranje lahko opravili zunanji izvajalci.
Taking these two factors into account, Italy arrived at similar workforce needs in the alternative solutions.
Ob upoštevanju teh dveh dejavnikov je Italija ugotovila, da obstajajo za alternativni rešitvi podobne potrebe po delovni sili.
As far as outward transport costs were concerned, Italy provided updated information and documentation on the transport costs for the Simbir model from the Timisoara site, according to which outward transport costs would not be higher from Cutro than from the Timisoara alternative.
V zvezi s stroški zunanjega prevoza je Italija podala posodobljene podatke in dokumentacijo o prevoznih stroških za model Simbir na lokaciji Timisoara, skladno s katerimi stroški zunanjega prevoza iz Cutra ne bi presegali alternativne Timisoare.
Finally, Italy remarked that the company had been suffering from the length of the procedure.
Nazadnje je Italija pripomnila, da je družba trpela zaradi dolgotrajnosti postopka.
The measure notified by Italy for De Tomaso constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Ukrep, ki ga je Italija prijavila za skupino De Tomaso, predstavlja državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
Lastly, there is extensive trade between Member States in the automobile market.
Nazadnje, trgovanje med državami članicami na avtomobilskem trgu je znatno.
This is not contested by Italy.
Tega Italija ne spodbija.
Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty lists certain types of aid that are compatible with the common market.
Člen 87(2) Pogodbe ES navaja nekatere vrste pomoči, ki so združljive s skupnim trgom.
In view of the nature and purpose of the aid, and the geographic location of the firm, subparagraphs (a), (b) and (c) are not applicable to the plan in question.
Glede na naravo in namen pomoči ter zemljepisne lege podjetja, se pododstavki (a), (b) in (c) ne uporabljajo za zadevni načrt.
Article 87(3) specifies other forms of aid which may be regarded as compatible with the common market.
Člen 87(3) Pogodbe določa druge oblike pomoči, ki se lahko upoštevajo kot združljive s skupnim trgom.
The Commission notes that the project is located in Calabria, a region which qualifies for assistance under Article 87(3)(a), with a maximum regional ceiling of 50% net grant equivalent (nge) for large companies [7].
Komisija ugotavlja, da je projekt lociran v Kalabriji, regiji, upravičeni do pomoči po členu 87(3)(a), z najvišjo regionalno zgornjo mejo 50 % neto ekvivalenta dotacije (nge) za velike družbe [7].
The Commission considers that the beneficiary of the aid under scrutiny is De Tomaso, the group that includes the companies Società Consortile De Tomaso srl and UAZ Europa srl, which will be the recipients of the aid.
Komisija meni, da je upravičenec do pomoči pod nadzorom skupina De Tomaso, ki vključuje družbi Societá Consortile De Tomaso srl in UAZ Europa srl, ki bosta prejemnici pomoči.
De Tomaso plans to manufacture and assemble cars.
Skupina De Tomaso načrtuje proizvodnjo in sestavo avtomobilov.
The firm is therefore part of the motor vehicle industry within the meaning of the Community framework for state aid to the motor vehicle industry [8] (‘the motor vehicle framework’), which applies to the project in question as the aid was notified to the Commission before 1 January 2003.
Zato je to podjetje del industrije motornih vozil v smislu okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč industriji motornih vozil [8] („okvir za motorna vozila“), ki se uporablja za zadevni projekt, saj je bila pomoč priglašena Komisiji pred 1. januarjem 2003.
Both the total cost of the project and the amount of aid exceed the notification thresholds in the motor vehicle framework.
Tako skupni stroški projekta in znesek pomoči presegajo priglašene prage v okviru za motorna vozila.
According to the motor vehicle framework, the Commission must ensure that the aid granted is both necessary for the implementation of the project and proportional to the gravity of the problems it intended to solve.
Glede na okvir za motorna vozila mora Komisija zagotoviti, da je dodeljena pomoč potrebna za izvedbo projekta in tudi sorazmerna glede na resnost problemov, ki naj bi jih rešila.
Both tests, necessity and proportionality, must be satisfied if the Commission is to authorise state aid in the motor vehicle industry.
Izpolnjeni morata biti obe zahtevi, potrebnost in sorazmernost, da lahko Komisija odobri državno pomoč v industriji motornih vozil.
According to point 3.2.(a) of the motor vehicle framework, in order to demonstrate the necessity for regional aid, the aid recipient must clearly prove that it has an economically viable alternative location for its project.
Skladno z odstavkom 3.2(a) okvira za motorna vozila mora prejemnik pomoči, da bi pokazal potrebo po regionalni pomoči, jasno dokazati, da ima za svoj projekt ekonomsko izvedljivo alternativno lokacijo.
If the project consists in modernisation and rationalisation of an existing plant, or if there is no alternative industrial site, whether new or in existence, capable of receiving the investment in question within the group, the undertaking would be compelled to carry out its project in the chosen location, even in the absence of aid.
Če projekt sestavlja modernizacija in racionalizacija obstoječega obrata ali ni alternativne industrijske lokacije, nove ali že obstoječe, ki bi lahko prejela zadevno naložbo znotraj skupine, bi bilo podjetje prisiljeno v izvajanje projekta na izbrani lokaciji, tudi brez pomoči.
In the present case, the geographic alternative to Cutro for the project would be to assemble the Simbir model at Timisoara (Romania) and produce the Vallelunga and Pantera models at Modena (Italy).
V tem primeru bi bila za projekt geografska alternativa Cutru sestava modela Simbir v Timisoari (Romunija) in proizvodnja modelov Vallelunga in Pantera v Modeni (Italija).
Taking into account the nature of the investment (greenfield project on a completely new site) and on the basis of the documents received, the Commission concludes that the project is mobile and that there is a viable alternative location.
Ob upoštevanju narave naložbe (popolnoma nov projekt na popolnoma novi lokaciji) in na podlagi prejete dokumentacije je Komisija sklenila, da je projekt mobilen in obstaja izvedljiva alternativna lokacija.
According to point 3.2.(b) of the motor vehicle framework, the Commission determines whether or not costs relating to the mobile aspects of the project are eligible.
Skladno s točko 3.2.(b) okvira za motorna vozila Komisija odloči, ali so stroški v zvezi z mobilnimi vidiki projekta upravičeni ali ne.
According to point 3.2.(c) of the motor vehicle framework the Commission needs to ensure that the planned aid is in proportion to the regional problems it is intended to resolve.
Skladno s točko 3.2.(c) okvira za motorna vozila mora Komisija zagotoviti, da je načrtovana pomoč v sorazmerju z regionalnimi problemi, ki jih namerava rešiti.
To that end, a CBA is used.
Za to se uporablja analiza stroškov in koristi (CBA).
The CBA compares, with regard to the mobile elements, the costs which an investor would bear in order to carry out the project in the region in question with those it would bear for an identical project in a different location.
Analiza stroškov in koristi v zvezi z mobilnimi elementi primerja stroške vlagatelja pri izvedbi projekta v zadevni regiji s stroški vlagatelja za enak projekt na drugi lokaciji.
This makes it possible to determine the specific handicaps of the assisted region concerned.
S tem je mogoče določiti specifično prikrajšanost zadevne regije – prejemnice pomoči.
The Commission authorises regional aid within the limit of the regional handicaps resulting from the investment in the comparator plant.
Komisija odobri regionalno pomoč v okviru regionalne prikrajšanosti, nastale zaradi naložbe v primerjalni obrat.
In accordance with point 3.2.(c) of the motor vehicle framework, operating handicaps of Cutro as compared with Timisoara and Modena are assessed over five years in the CBA since the project is to be carried out on a greenfield site.
V skladu s točko 3.2.(c) okvira za motorna vozila se prikrajšanosti pri delovanju Cutra v primerjavi s Timisoaro in Modeno v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA) ocenijo v petih letih, saj se bo projekt izvedel na povsem novi lokaciji.
The time period covered by the CBA submitted by the Italian authorities is 2005-09, that is three years [9] from the beginning of production in compliance with point 3.3 of Annex I to the motor vehicle framework.
Časovno obdobje, zajeto v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA), ki so jo predložile italijanske oblasti, je od leta 2005 do 2009, to je tri leta [9] od začetka proizvodnje v skladu s točko 3.3 Priloge I okvira za motorna vozila.
The notified CBA indicates a net cost handicap of EUR 158248977 in present values for the location at Cutro in comparison with the alternative locations.
Priglašena analiza stroškov in koristi nakazuje prikrajšanost v neto stroških v višini 158248977 EUR v trenutni vrednosti za lokacijo v Cutru v primerjavi z alternativnimi lokacijami.
Consequently, the ‘regional handicap ratio’ of the project would be 76,48% [10].
Zato bi „razmerje regionalne prikrajšanosti“ znašalo 76,48 % [10].
As a preliminary technical point, the Commission notes that the CBA presented by Italy takes 2003 as the base year for discounting the relevant figures.
Kot predhodno tehnično točko Komisija navaja, da analiza stroškov in koristi (CBA), ki jo je predložila Italija, kot izhodiščno leto uporablja leto 2003 za diskontiranje zadevnih številk.
The correct year is 2002, which is the year of notification of the planned aid to the Commission.
Pravilno leto je 2002, ki je leto prijave načrtovane pomoči Komisiji.
Since the discount rate applied is, correctly, that of 2002 (5,06%), the change in reference year does not however alter in any way the relevant ratios and figures, and can therefore be maintained.
Pravilno uporabljena diskontna stopnja je iz leta 2002 (5,06 %), vendar sprememba referenčnega leta na noben način ne spreminja zadevna razmerja in številke ter se zato lahko ohrani.
Turning to the substance of the CBA, the Commission has assessed the information provided by Italy with the aid of an external automotive expert.
Pri vsebini analize stroškov in koristi (CBA) je Komisija informacije, ki jih je predložila Italija, ocenila s pomočjo zunanjega avtomobilskega strokovnjaka.
The assessment has confirmed the doubts expressed in the decision to initiate formal proceedings regarding the comparability of the projects at Cutro and the alternative location.
Presoja je potrdila dvome, izražene v sklepu o sprožitvi postopka v zvezi s primerljivostjo projektov v Cutru in na alternativni lokaciji.
The reasons that lead to this conclusion are detailed below in points (40) to (63).
Razlogi za to odločitev so podrobno opisani v točkah (40) do (63).
As noted in the decision initiating formal investigation proceedings, the Commission has consistently interpreted the ‘identical projects’ requirement in the motor vehicle framework as meaning projects that concern the production of comparable motor vehicles, in comparable numbers, and that involve comparable production processes.
Kot je navedeno v sklepu o sprožitvi formalnega postopka preiskave, je Komisija zahtevo „identičnih projektov“ v okviru za motorna vozila dosledno razlagala kot projekte, ki zadevajo proizvodnjo primerljivih motornih vozil, v primerljivih številkah in vključujejo primerljive proizvodne postopke.
The Commission usually accepts that differences may exist in projects carried out at different sites, for example, regarding final product quality levels or varying degrees of plant automation as a function of labour costs.
Komisija ponavadi sprejema dejstvo, da obstajajo pri projektih, izvedenih na različnih lokacijah, razlike v zvezi z ravnmi kakovosti končnega proizvoda ali različnimi stopnjami avtomatizacije obrata kot funkcijo stroškov dela.
However, the Commission does not accept the comparison of substantially different projects, such as projects where important investments in equipment and machinery would be undertaken in one location, while no investments for the corresponding production would be undertaken at the comparator site.
Vendar Komisija ne sprejema primerjave bistveno drugačnih projektov, kot so projekti, kjer se pomembne naložbe v opremo in stroje izvedejo na eni lokaciji, medtem ko na primerjalni strani v ustrezno proizvodnjo niso izvedene nobene naložbe.
In the present case, the information provided by Italy has not allowed the Commission to fully compare the investment costs.
V tem primeru Komisija na podlagi informacij, ki jih je predložila Italija, ni mogla v celoti primerjati stroškov naložb.
Italy itself stated, in its comments in response to the decision initiating proceedings, that a comparison ‘operation by operation’ for the investments in the alternative solutions as required by the Commission for the CBA was not feasible.
Italija je v svojih pripombah kot odgovor na sklep o sprožitvi postopka sama izjavila, da primerjava „delovanje z delovanjem“ za naložbe v alternativni rešitvi, kot je zahtevala Komisija, ni izvedljiva.
Indeed, the projects in the chosen location of Cutro and in the alternative locations of Modena and Timisoara are, according to the information provided by Italy, substantially different from the point of view of the technological content of the investments and the degree of vertical differentiation.
Projekti na izbranih lokacijah v Cutru in na alternativnih lokacijah v Modeni in Timisoari so, v skladu z informacijami, ki jih je predložila Italija, bistveno drugačni z vidika tehnološke vsebine naložb in stopnje vertikalne diferenciacije.
Taking this constraint into account, the Commission has examined the available information with the aim of understanding the reasons underpinning the different investment choices and ascertaining whether the substantial difference in investment costs is acceptable within the CBA.
Ob upoštevanju te omejitve je Komisija pregledala razpoložljive informacije, da bi razumela razloge za podporo različnim naložbenim izbiram in ugotovila ali je v analizi stroškov in koristi (CBA) sprejemljiva bistvena razlika v naložbenih stroških.
In carrying out its assessment, the Commission does not contest the fact that projects can differ greatly between different locations, for example as a result of different industrial choices.
Pri izvedbi svoje ocene Komisija ne spodbija dejstva, da se lahko projekti na različnih lokacijah zelo razlikujejo, na primer zaradi različnih industrijskih odločitev.
The Commission notes first of all that investment costs at Cutro are much higher than at the alternative sites for land, building and construction, machinery and equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling.
Komisija je naprej ugotovila, da so naložbeni stroški zemljišča, gradnje in konstrukcije, strojev in opreme, orodja in barvil ter orodja dobavitelja v Cutru bistveno višji kot na alternativnih lokacijah.
As regards the costs of land and building and construction, the Commission considers that the difference reported in the CBA (EUR 41530657 at Cutro as against EUR 10084237 in the alternative) can be justified on the one hand by the fact that these assets are much cheaper in Romania than in Italy and on the other hand by the fact that De Tomaso already possesses in Modena the land and part of the buildings that would be necessary for the project.
Komisija v zvezi s stroški zemljišča, gradnje in konstrukcije meni, da je mogoče razliko, navedeno v analizi stroškov in koristi (41530657 EUR v Cutru proti 10084237 EUR v alternativi) na eni strani utemeljiti z dejstvom, da so ta sredstva v Romuniji veliko cenejša kot v Italiji, na drugi strani pa z dejstvom, da ima skupina De Tomaso v Modeni že v lasti zemljišče in del stavb, potrebnih za projekt.
Conversely, as regards machinery and equipment, tools and dies and supplier tooling, De Tomaso would have to purchase them in large part anew both at Cutro and at the alternative locations.
Nasprotno bi morala skupina De Tomaso stroje, opremo, orodja, barvila in orodja za dobavitelje v Cutru in na obeh alternativnih lokacijah v veliki meri kupiti nove.
For these assets, which are usually bought internationally, large differences in investment costs (EUR 165381681 at Cutro as against EUR 75624552 in the alternative) can be explained only by the fact that the project at Cutro foresees higher levels of automation and higher vertical integration.
Za ta sredstva, ki so ponavadi kupljena mednarodno, je mogoče velike razlike v naložbenih stroških (165381681 EUR v Cutru proti 75624552 EUR na alternativnih lokacijah) pojasniti le z dejstvom, da projekt v Cutru predvideva višjo stopnjo avtomatizacije in višjo vertikalno integracijo.
The Commission has assessed the available information in order to ascertain whether these cost differences are justified by the specific conditions of the different locations, and whether they are compatible with the comparability requirements of the CBA.
Komisija je razpoložljive informacije ocenila, da bi ugotovila ali posebni pogoji različnih lokacij te razlike v stroških upravičujejo in ali so združljive z zahtevami analize stroškov in koristi (CBA).
The Commission notes that Italy ascribes the cost difference between Cutro and Timisoara mainly to higher labour costs (higher automation is foreseen to reduce headcount) and to tighter social, safety and environmental legislation (newer and more complicated equipment is required to comply with it).
Komisija ugotavlja, da Italija razlike v stroških med Cutrom in Timisoaro pripisuje večinoma višjim stroškom dela (predvidena je večja avtomatizacija za zmanjšanje števila zaposlenih) in strožji socialni, varnostni in okoljski zakonodaji (novejša in bolj zapletena oprema se mora z njo skladati).
The cost difference between Cutro and Modena is, in Italy’s view, mainly the result of a lower skilled workforce (more automation needed to compensate for lack of manual skills) and the lack of an established supplier network (need for more vertical integration).
Po mnenju Italije je razlika v stroških med Cutrom in Modeno posledica manj usposobljene delovne sile (za nadomestilo pomanjkanja usposobljenosti delovne sile bo potrebna večja avtomatizacija) in pomanjkanja vzpostavljene dobaviteljske mreže (potreba po večji vertikalni integraciji).
According to the figures in the CBA, the workforce in 2009 would be 786 at Cutro, compared with 685 at Modena and Timisoara combined.
V skladu s podatki iz analize stroškov in koristi (CBA), bi štela delovna sila v Cutru leta 2009 786 zaposlenih, v primerjavi z 685 zaposlenimi v Modeni in Timisoari skupaj.
Even taking into account the higher level of vertical integration at Cutro (which results in a larger workforce for the operations carried out in-house), it is evident that higher automation brings hardly any savings in the number of workers employed.
Tudi ob upoštevanju višje stopnje vertikalne integracije (ki ima za posledico večjo delovno silo za dejavnosti, izvedene znotraj podjetja) je razvidno, da se z večjo avtomatizacijo komaj kaj zmanjša število zaposlenih.
Secondly, while it is true that social, safety and environmental legislation in Italy is more stringent than in Romania and therefore may require higher investments, this factor should not be overestimated.
Drugič, čeprav je res, da je socialna, varnostna in okoljska zakonodaja v Italiji strožja kot v Romuniji in bi zato zahtevala večje naložbe, se tega dejavnika ne sme precenjevati.
When medium to long term investment is decided, car makers tend to look at prospective legislation as well as existing laws.
Pri odločanju za srednje in dolgoročne naložbe proizvajalci avtomobilov poleg obstoječih zakonov navadno pregledajo tudi bodočo zakonodajo.
In the case of Romania, a convergence in standards towards western European levels seems reasonable in the medium term, also taking into account the country’s likely accession to the European Union.
V primeru Romunije se zdi zbliževanje s standardi zahodno evropskih ravni v srednjeročnem obdobju razumno, tudi ob upoštevanju verjetnega pristopa države k Evropski uniji.
Thirdly, it is not always the case that higher automation is needed to compensate for lower workforce skills.
Tretjič, ne velja vedno, da je za nadomestilo manjše usposobljenosti delovne sile potrebna večja avtomatizacija.
Indeed, the contrary is often true: automated machines require a highly skilled workforce for their operation and maintenance, while a lower skilled workforce can operate more easily simpler machinery.
Pogosto velja nasprotno: avtomatizirane naprave za svoje delovanje in vzdrževanje potrebujejo visoko usposobljeno delovno silo, medtem ko lahko manj usposobljena delovna sila lažje upravlja preprostejše stroje.
This is often not the case in the case under scrutiny.
To za primer pod nadzorom pogosto ne velja.
For example, in its comments in response to the decision initiating formal proceedings, Italy argued that outsourcing the painting operations for the sports cars in Modena did not artificially increase the handicap for Cutro.
Italija je na primer v svojih pripombah kot odgovor na sklep o sprožitvi formalnega postopka trdila, da zunanje opravljanje del lakiranja športnih avtomobilov v Modeni ni umetno povečalo prikrajšanosti za Cutro.
To support this claim, Italy provided estimates of the investment and operating costs for in-house painting at Modena, showing that the impact of this change on the CBA was very small, and was in the direction of increasing Cutro’s handicap.
V podporo svoji trditvi je Italija predložila oceno naložbe in stroškov delovanja za interno lakiranje v Modeni in pokazala, da je bil vpliv te spremembe na analizo stroškov in koristi zelo majhen ter v smeri povečanja prikrajšanosti Cutra.
However, the investment cost of the paintshop at Modena would be significantly lower than what is foreseen for Cutro (EUR 4.5 million as against EUR 6.3 million), due to its lower automation content.
Vendar bi bili naložbeni stroški lakirnice v Modeni zaradi manj avtomatizirane vsebine znatno nižji kot predvideni stroški za Cutro (4,5 milijonov EUR proti 6,3 milijonov EUR).