natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
 (iv) Decision of a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters regarding a decision as referred to in point iii.
 (iv) Odločba sodišča, ki ima pristojnost zlasti v kazenskih zadevah, v zvezi z odločbo iz točke iii.
The decision was made on (date)
Odločba je bila izdana (datum)
The decision became final on (date)
Odločba je postala pravnomočna (datum)
Reference number of the decision (if available):
Referenčna številka odločbe (če je na voljo):
The financial penalty constitutes an obligation to pay (tick the relevant box(es) and indicate the amount(s) with indication of currency):
Denarna kazen pomeni obveznost plačila (odkljukajte ustrezno(-a) polje(-a) ter navedite znesek(-e) in valuto):
 (i) A sum of money on conviction of an offence imposed in a decision.
 (i) denarnega zneska iz odločbe o obsodbi zaradi kršitve;
Amount:
Znesek:
 (ii) Compensation imposed in the same decision for the benefit of victims, where the victim may not be a civil party to the proceedings and the court is acting in its exercise of its criminal jurisdiction.
 (ii) odškodnine iz iste odločbe za oškodovance, kadar oškodovanec ne more biti civilna stranka v postopku, sodišče pa izvršuje svojo kazensko pristojnost;
 (iii) A sum of money in respect of the costs of court or administrative proceedings leading to the decision.
 (iii) denarnega zneska za stroške sodnega ali upravnega postopka, ki se zaključi z izdajo odločbe;
 (iv) A sum of money to a public fund or a victim support organisation, imposed in the same decision.
 (iv) denarnega zneska javnemu skladu ali organizaciji za podporo oškodovancem, ki je določen v isti odločbi;
The total amount of the financial penalty with indication of currency:
skupnega zneska denarne kazni z navedbo valute:
A summary of facts and a description of the circumstances in which the offence(s) has(have) been committed, including time and place:
Povzetek dejstev in opis okoliščin, v katerih je bila/so bile povzročena(-e) kršitev/kršitve, vključno s časom in krajem:
Nature and legal classification of the offence(s) and the applicable statutory provision/code on basis of which the decision was made:
Vrsta in pravna klasifikacija kršitve/kršitev ter zakonski predpis/zakon, na podlagi katerega je bila izdana odločba:
To the extent that the offence(s) identified under point 2 above constitute(s) one or more of the following offences, confirm that by ticking the relevant box(es):
Kolikor kršitev/kršitve iz točke 2 pomeni(-jo) eno ali več naslednjih kršitev, to potrdi tako, da odkljukate ustrezno(-a) polje(-a):
 participation in a criminal organisation;
 udeležba v hudodelski združbi,
 terrorism;
 terorizem,
 trafficking in human beings;
 trgovina z ljudmi,
 sexual exploitation of children and child pornography;
 spolna zloraba otrok in otroška pornografija,
 illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances;
 nedovoljen promet s prepovedanimi drogami in psihotropnimi snovmi,
 illicit trafficking in weapons, munitions and explosives;
 nedovoljena trgovina z orožjem, strelivom in razstrelivi,
 corruption;
 korupcija,
 fraud, including that affecting the financial interests of the European Communities within the meaning of the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests;
 goljufije, vključno s tistimi, ki škodijo finančnim interesom Evropskih skupnosti v smislu Konvencije z dne 26. julija 1995 o varovanju finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti,  pranje premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem,
 laundering of the proceeds of crime;
 ponarejanje denarja, vključno z eurom,
 counterfeiting currency, including of the euro;
 kazniva dejanja, povezana z računalništvom,
 facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence;
 omogočanje nezakonitega vstopa in bivanja,
 murder, grievous bodily injury;
 umor, huda telesna poškodba,
 illicit trade in human organs and tissue;
 nedovoljeno trgovanje s človeškimi organi in tkivi,
 kidnapping, illegal restraint and hostage-taking;
 ugrabitev, protipraven odvzem prostosti in jemanje talcev,
 racism and xenophobia;
 rasizem in ksenofobija,
 organised or armed robbery;
 organiziran ali oborožen rop,
 illicit trafficking in cultural goods, including antiques and works of art;
 nedovoljen promet s kulturnimi dobrinami, vključno s starinami in umetniškimi deli,
 swindling;
 goljufija,
 racketeering and extortion;
 izsiljevanje in oderuštvo,
 counterfeiting and piracy of products;
 ponarejanje in piratstvo,
 forgery of administrative documents and trafficking therein;
 ponarejanje uradnih dokumentov in promet z njimi,
 forgery of means of payment;
 ponarejanje plačilnih sredstev,
 illicit trafficking in hormonal substances and other growth promoters;
 nedovoljena trgovina s hormonskimi snovmi in drugimi pospeševalci rasti,
 illicit trafficking in nuclear or radioactive materials;
 nedovoljen promet z jedrskimi ali radioaktivnimi snovmi;
 trafficking in stolen vehicles;
 promet z ukradenimi vozili,
 rape;
 posilstvo,
 arson;
 požig,
 crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court;
 kazniva dejanja, ki sodijo v pristojnost Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča,
 unlawful seizure of aircraft/ships;
 protipravna ugrabitev letal/ladij,
 sabotage;
 sabotaža,
 conduct which infringes road traffic regulations, including breaches of regulations pertaining to driving hours and rest periods and regulations on hazardous goods;
 ravnanja, ki so v nasprotju s predpisi o varnosti v cestnem prometu, vključno s kršitvamipravil o številu ur vožnje in času počitka, ter predpisov o nevarnem blagu,
 smuggling of goods;
 tihotapljenje blaga,
 infringements of intellectual property rights;
 kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine,
 threats and acts of violence against persons, including violence during sport events;
 grožnje in nasilna dejanja nad osebami, vključno z nasiljem na športnih prireditvah,
 criminal damage;
 kaznivo dejanje povzročitve škode,
 theft;
 kraja,
 offences established by the issuing State and serving the purpose of implementing obligations arising from instruments adopted under the EC Treaty or under Title VI of the EU Treaty.
 kršitve, ki jih ugotovi država izdajateljica in pri katerih velja izvajanje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz pravnih aktov, sprejetih na podlagi Pogodbe ES ali naslova VI Pogodbe EU.
If this box is ticked, indicate the exact provisions of the instrument adopted on the basis of the EC Treaty or the EU Treaty that the offence relates to:
Če odkljukate to polje, navedite natančne določbe pravnega akta, sprejetega na podlagi Pogodbe ES ali Pogodbe EU, v zvezi s kršitvijo:
To the extent that the offence(s) identified under point 2 above are not covered by point 3, give a full description of the offence(s) concerned:
Kolikor kršitev/kršitve iz točke 2 ni(-so) zajeta(-e) v točki 3, podaj popolni opis zadevne(-ih) kršitve/kršitev:
Status of the decision imposing the financial penalty
Status odločbe o plačilu denarne kazni
Confirm that (tick the boxes):
Potrjujemo, da (ustrezno odkljukajte):
 (a) the decision is a final decision
 (a) je odločba dokončna.
 (b) to the knowledge of the authority issuing the Certificate, a decision against the same person in respect of the same acts has not been delivered in the executing State and that no such decision delivered in any State other than the issuing State or the executing State has been executed.
 (b) po vedenju organa, ki je izdal potrdilo, odločba zoper isto osebo v zvezi z istimi dejanji v državi izvršiteljici ni bila izdana in nobena odločba, izdana v drugi državi, razen države izdajateljice ali države izvršiteljice, ni bila izvršena.
Indicate if the case been subject to a written procedure:
Navedite, če se je v primeru uporabil pisni postopek:
 (a) No, it has not.
 (a) Ne.
 (b) Yes, it has.
 (b) Da.
It is confirmed that the person concerned was, in accordance with the law of the issuing State, informed personally or via a representative competent according to national law of his right to contest the case and of time limits of such a legal remedy
Potrjujemo, da je bila zadevna oseba osebno ali prek zastopnika, pooblaščenega v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, obveščena o pravici izpodbijanja odločbe in o rokih za takšno pravno sredstvo.
Indicate if the person concerned appeared personally in the proceedings:
Navedite, ali je bila oseba osebno navzoča pri postopku.
 (a) Yes, he or she did.
 (a) Da.
 (b) No, he or she did not.
 (b) Ne.
It is confirmed:
Potrjujemo,
 that the person was informed personally, or via a representative competent according to national law, of the proceedings in accordance with the law of the issuing State,
 da je bila oseba o postopku v skladu s pravom države izdajateljice obveščena osebno ali preko zastopnika, pooblaščenega v skladu z nacionalnim pravom,
 that the person has indicated that he or she does not contest the case
 da je oseba navedla, da ne bo izpodbijala odločbe.
Partial payment of the penalty
Delno plačilo kazni
If any part of the penalty has already been paid to the issuing State, or, to the knowledge of the authority issuing the Certificate, to any other State, indicate the amount which has been paid:
Če je bil del kazni že plačan državi izdajateljici ali, po vednosti organa izdajatelja potrdila, kateri drugi državi, navedite višino plačanega zneska:
Alternative sanctions, including custodial sanctions
Nadomestne kazni, vključno z zaporno kaznijo
State whether the issuing State allows for the application by the executing State of alternative sanctions in case it is not possible to enforce the decision imposing a penalty, either totally or in part:
Navedite, ali država izdajateljica dovoli, da država izvršiteljica odredi nadomestne kazni v primeru, če odločbe o plačilu kazni v celoti ali delno ni mogoče izvršiti:
 no
 ne
If yes, state which sanctions may be applied (nature of the sanctions, maximum level of the sanctions):
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, navedite, katere kazni se lahko odredijo (vrsta kazni in najvišja možna kazen):
Other circumstances relevant to the case (optional information):
Druge okoliščine, ki so pomembne za zadevo (navedba neobvezna):
The text of the decision imposing the financial penalty is attached to the certificate.
Besedilo odločbe o plačilu denarne kazni je priloženo potrdilu.
Signature of the authority issuing the certificate and/or its representative certifying the content of the certificate as accurate:
Podpis organa, ki je potrdilo izdal, in/ali njegovega zastopnika, s katerim potrdi točnost njegove vsebine:
Post held (title/grade):
Delovno mesto (naziv/rang):
Official stamp (if available)
Uradni žig (če je na voljo)
Where a decision is transmitted to the executing State because the legal person against whom the decision has been passed has its registered seat in that State, Registration number and Registered seat must be completed.
Če se odločba posreduje državi izvršiteljici, ker ima pravna oseba, zoper katero je bila izdana odločba, v tej državi registrirani sedež, je treba navesti številko registracije in registrirani sedež.
 Custody.
 Pripor.
Maximum period:
Najdaljše možno trajanje:
 Community service (or equivalent).
 Javna dela (ali enakovredno).
Maximum period
Najdaljše možno trajanje:
 Other sanctions.
 Druge kazni.
computer-related crime, environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties,
kazniva dejanja zoper okolje, vključno z nedovoljenim prometom z ogroženimi živalskimi vrstami ter z ogroženimi rastlinskimi vrstami in podvrstami,
 computer-related crime;  environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties;
 kazniva dejanja zoper okolje, vključno z nedovoljenim prometom z ogroženimi živalskimi vrstami ter z ogroženimi rastlinskimi vrstami in sortami,
Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2005/222/PNZ
on attacks against information systems
o napadih na informacijske sisteme
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 30(1)(a), 31(1)(e) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 29, 30(1)(a), 31(1)(e) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
The objective of this Framework Decision is to improve cooperation between judicial and other competent authorities, including the police and other specialised law enforcement services of the Member States, through approximating rules on criminal law in the Member States in the area of attacks against information systems.
Cilj tega okvirnega sklepa je s približevanjem določb kazenskega prava držav članic izboljšati sodelovanje med pravosodnimi in drugimi pristojnimi organi, vključno s policijo in drugimi specializiranimi službami kazenskega pregona držav članic, na področju napadov na informacijske sisteme.
There is evidence of attacks against information systems, in particular as a result of the threat from organised crime, and increasing concern at the potential of terrorist attacks against information systems which form part of the critical infrastructure of the Member States.
Obstajajo dokazi o napadih na informacijske sisteme, zlasti kot posledica groženj s strani organiziranega kriminala, ter vse večja zaskrbljenost zaradi možnosti terorističnih napadov na informacijske sisteme, ki so del ključne infrastrukture držav članic.
This constitutes a threat to the achievement of a safer information society and an area of freedom, security and justice, and therefore requires a response at the level of the European Union.
To predstavlja grožnjo doseganju cilja varnejše informacijske družbe ter območja svobode, varnosti in pravice in zato zahteva odgovor na ravni Evropske unije.
An effective response to those threats requires a comprehensive approach to network and information security, as underlined in the eEurope Action Plan, in the Communication by the Commission ‘Network and Information Security: Proposal for a European Policy Approach’ and in the Council Resolution of 28 January 2002 on a common approach and specific actions in the area of network and information security [2].
Učinkovit odgovor na te grožnje zahteva celovit pristop do varnosti omrežij in informacij, kot je poudarjeno v akcijskem načrtu eEvropa, v sporočilu Komisije „Varnost omrežij in informacij: predlog evropske politike pristopa“ in Resoluciji Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o skupnem pristopu in posebnih ukrepih na področju varnosti omrežij in informacij [2].
The need to further increase awareness of the problems related to information security and provide practical assistance has also been stressed in the European Parliament Resolution of 5 September 2001.
Potreba po nadaljnjem ozaveščanju o problemih, povezanih z informacijsko varnostjo, in zagotavljanju praktične pomoči je prav tako poudarjena v Resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. septembra 2001.
Significant gaps and differences in Member States’ laws in this area may hamper the fight against organised crime and terrorism, and may complicate effective police and judicial cooperation in the area of attacks against information systems.
Velike vrzeli in razlike v zakonodaji držav članic na tem področju lahko ovirajo boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu ter otežijo učinkovito policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje na področju napadov na informacijske sisteme.
The transnational and borderless character of modern information systems means that attacks against such systems are often trans-border in nature, thus underlining the urgent need for further action to approximate criminal laws in this area.
Ker so sodobni informacijski sistemi nadnacionalni in brezmejni, so napadi na takšne sisteme pogosto čezmejne narave; zato so nujno potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi za približevanje določb kazenskega prava na tem področju.
The Action Plan of the Council and the Commission on how to best implement the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam on an area of freedom, security and justice [3], the Tampere European Council on 15 to 16 October 1999, the Santa Maria da Feira European Council on 19 to 20 June 2000, the Commission in the ‘Scoreboard’ and the European Parliament in its Resolution of 19 May 2000 indicate or call for legislative action against high technology crime, including common definitions, incriminations and sanctions.
Akcijski načrt Sveta in Komisije o čim boljšem izvajanju določb Pogodbe iz Amsterdama na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice [3], zasedanje Evropskega sveta v Tampereju 5. in 16. oktobra, zasedanje Evropskega svet v Santa Marii da Feiri 19. in 20. junija 2000, Komisija v „preglednici dosežkov“ in Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 19. maja 2000 navajajo ali pozivajo na zakonodajne ukrepe proti kriminalu na področju visokih tehnologij, vključno s skupnimi opredelitvami, obtožnicami in sankcijami.
It is necessary to complement the work performed by international organisations, in particular the Council of Europe’s work on approximating criminal law and the G8’s work on transnational cooperation in the area of high tech crime, by providing a common approach in the European Union in this area.
Z zagotovitvijo skupnega pristopa do tega področja v Evropski uniji je treba dopolniti delo, ki so ga opravile mednarodne organizacije, zlasti delo Sveta Evrope na področju približevanja kazenske zakonodaje in delo skupine G8 o transnacionalnem sodelovanju na področju kriminala na področju visokih tehnologij.
This call was further elaborated by the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on ‘Creating a Safer Information Society by Improving the Security of Information Infrastructures and Combating Computer-related Crime’.
Ta poziv je bil še podrobneje opredeljen v sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o „oblikovanju varnejše informacijske družbe z izboljšanjem varnosti informacijskih infrastruktur in bojem proti računalniškem kriminalu“.
Criminal law in the area of attacks against information systems should be approximated in order to ensure the greatest possible police and judicial cooperation in the area of criminal offences related to attacks against information systems, and to contribute to the fight against organised crime and terrorism.
Kazensko zakonodajo na področju napadov na informacijske sisteme je treba približati, da se zagotovi največje možno policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje na področju kaznivih dejanj, povezanih z napadi na informacijske sisteme, ter pripomore k boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu.
All Member States have ratified the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data.
Vse države članice so ratificirale Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov pri avtomatski obdelavi osebnih podatkov.
The personal data processed in the context of the implementation of this Framework Decision should be protected in accordance with the principles of the said Convention.
Osebne podatke, obdelane v okviru izvajanja tega okvirnega sklepa, je treba varovati v skladu z načeli te konvencije.
Common definitions in this area, particularly of information systems and computer data, are important to ensure a consistent approach in Member States in the application of this Framework Decision.
Skupne opredelitve na tem področju, zlasti informacijskih sistemov in računalniških podatkov, so pomembne za zagotovitev doslednega pristopa pri uporabi tega okvirnega sklepa v državah članicah.
There is a need to achieve a common approach to the constituent elements of criminal offences by providing for common offences of illegal access to an information system, illegal system interference and illegal data interference.
Z zagotovitvijo skupnih opredelitev kaznivega dejanja nezakonitega dostopa do informacijskega sistema, nezakonitega poseganja v sistem in nezakonitega poseganja v podatke je treba doseči skupni pristop do sestavnih elementov kaznivih dejanj.
In the interest of combating computer-related crime, each Member State should ensure effective judicial cooperation in respect of offences based on the types of conduct referred to in Articles 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Vsaka država članica mora v interesu boja proti računalniškemu kriminalu zagotoviti učinkovito pravosodno sodelovanje glede dejanj, ki temeljijo na ravnanjih, opisanih v členih 2, 3, 4 in 5.
There is a need to avoid over-criminalisation, particularly of minor cases, as well as a need to avoid criminalising right-holders and authorised persons.
Treba se je izogniti prekomerni kriminalizaciji, zlasti v primerih majhnega pomena, in tudi kriminalizaciji imetnikov pravic in pooblaščenih oseb.
There is a need for Member States to provide for penalties for attacks against information systems.
Države članice zagotovijo potrebne kazni za napade na informacijske sisteme.
The penalties thus provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Takšne kazni so učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
It is appropriate to provide for more severe penalties when an attack against an information system is committed within the framework of a criminal organisation, as defined in the Joint Action 98/733 JHA of 21 December 1998 on making it a criminal offence to participate in a criminal organisation in the Member State of the European Union [4].
Primerno je predvideti strožje kazni za napade na informacijske sisteme, ki se izvedejo v okviru hudodelske združbe, kakor je opredeljena v Skupnem ukrepu 98/733/PNZ z dne 21. decembra 1998 o kaznivosti udeležbe v hudodelski združbi v državah članicah Evropske unije [4].
It is also appropriate to provide for more severe penalties where such an attack has caused serious damages or has affected essential interests.
Prav tako je primerno predvideti strožje kazni, kadar takšen napad povzroči veliko škodo ali so bili prizadeti bistveni interesi.
Measures should also be foreseen for the purposes of cooperation between Member States with a view to ensuring effective action against attacks against information systems.
Predvideti je treba tudi ukrepe za sodelovanje med državami članicami zaradi zagotavljanja učinkovitega ukrepanja proti napadom na informacijske sisteme.
Member States should therefore make use of the existing network of operational contact points referred to in the Council Recommendation of 25 June 2001 on contact points maintaining a 24-hour service for combating high-tech crime [5], for the exchange of information.
V ta namen morajo države članice za izmenjavo informacij uporabiti obstoječo mrežo operativnih točk za stike iz Priporočila Sveta z dne 25. junija 2001 o točkah za stike s 24-urnim delovanjem za boj proti kriminalu na področju visokih tehnologij [5].
Since the objectives of this Framework Decision, ensuring that attacks against information systems be sanctioned in all Member States by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties and improving and encouraging judicial cooperation by removing potential complications, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, as rules have to be common and compatible, and can therefore be better achieved at the level of the Union, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty.
Ker ciljev tega okvirnega sklepa, to je zagotoviti, da so za napade na informacijske sisteme v vseh državah članicah predpisane učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazenske sankcije, ter izboljšati in spodbujati pravosodno sodelovanje z odstranjevanjem morebitnih zapletov, ne morejo v zadostni meri doseči države članice same, ker morajo pravila biti skupna in združljiva in se jih torej lažje doseže na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Framework Decision does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz omenjenega člena ta okvirni sklep ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za dosego teh ciljev.