natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
During the IP, farmed salmon was manufactured in the Community by
Med obdobjem preiskave so gojenega lososa v Skupnosti predelovali:
Community producers which were not related to Norwegian exporters or importers and which were complainants or explicitly supported the complaint;
proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki niso bili povezani z norveškimi izvozniki oziroma uvozniki ki so bili pritožniki oziroma so izrecno podpirali pritožbo;
Community producers which were not related to Norwegian exporters or importers, and which did not take a position on the complaint (‘silents’);
proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki niso bili povezani z norveškimi izvozniki oziroma uvozniki ki niso izrazili stališča v zvezi s pritožbo („molčeči“);
Several other producers which were found to be related to Norwegian exporters or importers (‘related’).
več drugih proizvajalcev, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so povezani z norveškimi izvozniki oziroma uvozniki („povezani“).
Several of the other producers related to Norwegian exporters or importers made themselves known and requested to be included in the definition of the Community production.
Več drugih proizvajalcev, povezanih z norveškimi izvozniki oziroma uvozniki, se je javilo in zaprosilo, da naj jih vključijo v opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti.
They also defined themselves as Community industry.
Opredelili so se tudi kot industrija Skupnosti.
However, this claim was rejected on the basis of the provisions of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar je bil ta zahtevek zavrnjen na podlagi določb člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
It was considered, in particular, that the relationship between these related producers and the exporters or importers of the dumped product could be such as to cause the producers concerned to behave differently from non-related producers.
Zlasti je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi lahko odnos med temi povezanimi proizvajalci in izvozniki oziroma uvozniki dampinškega proizvoda povzročil, da bi se zadevni proizvajalci obnašali drugače kakor nepovezani proizvajalci.
Consequently, the output of these other producers was not taken into consideration when calculating Community production.
Posledično proizvodnja teh drugih proizvajalcev ni bila upoštevana pri izračunu proizvodnje Skupnosti.
This constitutes a major proportion of the Community production.
To predstavlja večji delež proizvodnje Skupnosti.
The complaining Community producers are therefore deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Articles 4(1) and 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za proizvajalce Skupnosti, ki so se pritožili, zato velja, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
Sampling for injury assessment purposes
Vzorčenje za ocenjevanje škode
In view of the large number of producers of farmed salmon in the Community, the application of sampling techniques was foreseen in the notice of initiation for the assessment of injury.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev gojenega lososa v Skupnosti je bila za ocenjevanje škode v obvestilu o začetku predvidena uporaba tehnike vzorčenja.
The selection of the sample of Community producers was based on the largest representative volume of production that could be reasonably investigated within the time available, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Izbira vzorca proizvajalcev Skupnosti je v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe temeljila na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu proizvodnje, ki ga je v razpoložljivem času mogoče razumno preiskati.
On the basis of the information provided to the Commission, the six Community producers listed above in recital 7 were initially selected for the sample and were asked to reply to a questionnaire.
Na podlagi informacij, predloženih Komisiji, je bilo prvotno šest proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (7), izbranih v vzorec in zaprošenih, da odgovorijo na vprašalnik.
Verifications at the premises of these companies were carried out.
V teh podjetij so bila izvedena preverjanja.
The investigation showed that Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd did not produce farmed salmon within the whole period considered and therefore was not in a position to provide all the data and information requested in the questionnaire.
Preiskava je pokazala, da podjetje Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd ni proizvajalo gojenega lososa znotraj celotnega obravnavanega obdobja in zato ni bilo sposobno zagotoviti vseh podatkov in informacij, zahtevanih v vprašalniku.
Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd was established as a company in January 2004 after having purchased certain assets of a salmon producing company which was in receivership and could only provide data with regard to the IP.
Podjetje Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd je bilo ustanovljeno januarja 2004, potem ko je kupilo določeno premoženje podjetja za proizvodnjo lososa, ki je bilo v postopku prisilne poravnave, in je lahko zagotovilo podatke samo o obdobju preiskave.
Consequently, the injury indicators discussed below as from recital 63 have been established on the basis of the verified information provided by the other five companies listed above in recital 7.
Posledično so bili kazalniki škode, o katerih bo govor spodaj, začenši z uvodno izjavo (63), določeni na podlagi preverjenih informacij, ki jih je zagotovilo drugih pet podjetij, navedenih v zgornji izjavi (7).
However, data from Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd were used for the purpose of calculating undercutting and underselling.
Vendar so bili podatki podjetja Celtic Atlantic Salmon Ltd uporabljeni za izračun nelojalnega znižanja cen in nelojalnega nižanja ciljnih cen.
The accumulated production of the five Community producers selected for the sample that fully co-operated in the investigation was at around 8300 tonnes during the IP, or around 37 % of the estimated total Community production of farmed salmon.
Akumulirana proizvodnja petih proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki so bili izbrani v vzorec in ki so v celoti sodelovali v preiskavi, je znašala približno 8300 ton med obdobjem preiskave oziroma približno 37 % ocenjene celotne proizvodnje gojenega lososa v Skupnosti.
The analysis of injury is based on (a) the performance injury indicators such as sales prices, stocks, profitability, return on investment, cash flow, investments, ability to raise capital and wages, which were established on the basis of the information verified at the level of the sample and (b) the other injury indicators, such as production, production capacity, capacity utilisation, sales volume, market share, growth, employment, productivity and magnitude of the margin of dumping which were established on the basis of data collected at the level of the Community industry as a whole.
Analiza škode temelji na (a) kazalnikih škode poslovanja, kot so prodajne cene, donosnost, donos od naložb, denarni tok, naložbe, sposobnost zbiranja kapitala in dvigovanja plač, ki so bili določeni na podlagi informacij, preverjenih na ravni vzorca, ter (b) drugih kazalnikih škode, kot so proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost, izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, obseg prodaje, tržni delež, rast, zaposlovanje, produktivnost in višina stopnje dampinga, ki so bili določeni na podlagi podatkov, zbranih na ravni industrije Skupnosti kot celote.
During the period considered the Community consumption developed as follows:
Med obravnavanim obdobjem se je poraba Skupnosti razvijala na naslednji način:
Table 1
Tabela 1:
Source: Eurostat and data for Ireland, United Kingdom, France.
Vir: Eurostat in podatki za Irsko, Združeno kraljestvo in Francijo.
All figures relate to EU 25.
Vsi podatki se nanašajo na EU 25.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the total production by all producers in the Community plus imports from all third countries minus European Community exports.
Poraba Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi celotne proizvodnje vseh proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, povečane za uvoz iz vseh tretjih držav in zmanjšane za izvoz Evropske skupnosti.
Production by all producers established in the Community was established on the basis of data provided by the countries where production is located, i.e. Ireland, United Kingdom and France.
Proizvodnja vseh proizvajalcev iz Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih zagotovile države, v katerih poteka proizvodnja, tj. Irska, Združeno kraljestvo in Francija.
Imported and exported quantities were derived from Eurostat.
Uvozne in izvozne količine so bile pridobljene od Eurostata.
It should be noted that large scale farming of farmed salmon in the Community is confined to the United Kingdom (Scotland) and Ireland.
Treba je opozoriti, da je obsežno gojenje gojenega lososa v Skupnosti omejeno na Združeno kraljestvo (Škotska) in Irsko.
Certain adjustments were made to convert net weights as reported by Eurostat to round weights or ‘whole fish equivalents’ (WFE) [7] as it is common for comparisons in the industry to be made on WFE basis.
Narejene so bile nekatere prilagoditve za spremembo neto teže, kot jo je sporočil Eurostat, v skupni ulov oziroma „ekvivalent cele ribe“ (whole fish equivalents – WFE) [7], saj je običajno, da se primerjava v industriji opravi na podlagi WFE.
Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, the figures for fresh, chilled and frozen salmon excluding fillets and for fresh, chilled and frozen salmon fillets were, depending on the presentation of the salmon, divided by the conversion factors of 0,90 and 0,65 respectively, i.e. the commonly accepted conversion factors by the salmon industry.
Zato, razen če ni bilo določeno drugače, so bili podatki za sveži, hlajeni in zamrznjeni losos brez filetov ter za sveže, hlajene in zamrznjene lososove filete, odvisno od predstavitve lososa, deljeni s pretvorbenimi faktorji 0,90 oziroma 0,65, torej pretvorbenimi faktorji, ki jih je industrija za predelavo lososa splošno sprejela.
The above table shows that consumption increased between 2001 and 2003 by 16 %.
Zgornja tabela kaže, da je med letoma 2001 in 2003 poraba narasla za 16 %.
In the IP consumption remained nearly on the same level as in 2003, with a slight decrease of 0,5 %.
V obdobju preiskave je ostala poraba skoraj na enaki ravni kot leta 2003, z rahlim znižanjem za 0,5 %.
Overall the increase of consumption over the period considered was as high as 15 %.
V celoti je poraba v obravnavanem obdobju narasla za 15 %.
Imports into the Community from the country concerned
Uvoz iz zadevne države v Skupnost
Volume of the imports concerned
Obseg zadevnega uvoza
During the period considered the volume of the imports from Norway derived from Eurostat data using the methodology described in recital (51) above developed as follows:
Med obravnavanim obdobjem se je obseg uvoza iz Norveške, pridobljen na podlagi podatkov Eurostata z uporabo metodologije iz uvodne izjave (52), razvijal na naslednji način:
Table 2
Tabela 2:
Volume of imports concerned
Obseg zadevnega uvoza
Source: Eurostat.
Vir: Eurostat.
The above table shows that the volume of imports of farmed salmon from Norway increased by 35 % during the period considered.
Zgornja tabela kaže, da je obseg uvoza gojenega lososa iz Norveške med obravnavanim obdobjem narasel za 35 %.
The increase was as high as 31 % between 2001 and 2003 and it further increased by 3 % between 2003 and the IP.
Uvoz se je med letoma 2001 in 2003 povečal za 31 % ter je med letom 2003 in obravnavanim obdobjem narasel še za 3 %.
In other words, while consumption increased by nearly 80000 tonnes during the period considered, Norwegian exporters were able to increase their sales on the Community market by 93000 tonnes, which represents more than the total increase of consumption.
Z drugimi besedami, medtem ko se je poraba med obravnavanim obdobjem povečala za skoraj 80000 ton, so norveški izvozniki povečali svojo prodajo na trgu Skupnosti za 93000 ton, kar je več kot celotno povečanje porabe.
Market share of the imports concerned
Tržni delež zadevnega uvoza
The market share held by exporting producers in Norway developed as shown below:
Tržni delež proizvajalcev izvoznikov na Norveškem se je razvijal, kot je prikazano spodaj:
Table 3
Tabela 3:
Market share of the imports from Norway
Tržni delež zadevnega uvoza iz Norveške
Source: Eurostat, Community production and exports calculated from data for Ireland, United Kingdom, France and Latvia.
Vir: Eurostat, proizvodnja in izvoz Skupnosti, izračunana na podlagi podatkov za Irsko, Združeno kraljestvo, Francijo in Latvijo.
As was the case for the imports, Norwegian market share has continuously increased during the period considered.
Kakor je bilo pri uvozu, je med obravnavanim obdobjem tržni delež Norveške stalno naraščal.
Overall, the market share based on import volumes increased by 17 % or 8,6 percentage points during the period considered.
V celoti se je tržni delež na podlagi obsega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 17 % oziroma 8,6 odstotne točke.
The increase between 2002 and the IP was as high as 6,1 percentage points.
Med letom 2002 in obdobjem preiskave se je tržni delež povečal za 6,1 odstotne točke.
Average prices of dumped imports
Povprečne cene dampinškega uvoza
The price evolution of dumped imports from Norway sold on the Community market is shown below.
Gibanje cen dampinškega uvoza iz Norveške, prodanega na trgu Skupnosti, je prikazano spodaj:
Table 4
Tabela 4:
Average price of dumped imports from Norway (EUR/kg)
Povprečna cena dampinškega uvoza z Norveške (EUR/kg)
Over the period considered the average price of dumped imports decreased by 16 %.
Med obravnavanim obdobjem se je povprečna cena dampinškega uvoza znižala za 16 %.
The above table also shows a clear coincidence in time between the fall in price which plummeted downwards in 2003 and the surge of dumped imports on the Community market evidenced in recital 54.
Zgornja tabela prav tako kaže, da sta padec cen, ki so se hitro znižale leta 2003, in nenaden porast dampinškega uvoza na trg Skupnosti, kar kaže uvodna izjava (55), zagotovo časovno sovpadala.
For the purposes of calculating the level of price undercutting during the IP, the weighted average sales prices of the sampled Community industry producers were compared to the weighted average export prices of the sampled exporting producers from Norway.
Za izračun stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen med obravnavanim obdobjem so bile tehtane povprečne prodajne cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti primerjane s tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov z Norveške.
This comparison was made for comparable types of farmed salmon and at the same level of trade, namely for sales to the first independent customer.
Ta primerjava je bila narejena za primerljive tipe gojenega lososa in v isti fazi trgovine, in sicer za prodajo prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu.
The comparison was made after deduction of rebates and discounts and the prices of the imports were CIF Community frontier, adjusted for customs duties.
Primerjava je bila narejena po odbitku rabatov in popustov, cene uvoza pa so bile CIF na mejah Skupnosti, prilagojene carinam.
The prices of the sampled Community industry producers were taken at an ex-works level, i.e. excluding transport costs and at levels of trade considered to be comparable to those of the imports concerned.
Cene vzorčenih proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti so bile vzete na ravni franko tovarna, tj. brez transportnih stroškov in na stopnjah trgovanja, ki so se štele za primerljive s stopnjami zadevnega uvoza.
For those sampled Community industry producers which sold their fish at the farm gate with a deduction of a fee paid to a processing factory, an upward adjustment was made to reflect processing and packing costs in order to make their prices comparable to those of other producers in the sample.
Za tiste vzorčene proizvajalce industrije Skupnosti, ki so svoje ribe prodajali na vhodnih vratih kmetije z odbitkom provizije, ki se plača predelovalni tovarni, je bilo narejeno prilagajanje navzgor, da bi izražalo stroške predelave in embaliranja, da bi bila tako omogočena primerljivost njihovih cen s cenami drugih proizvajalcev v vzorcu.
This adjustment was made on the basis of the costs incurred by other producers in the sample for these activities or on the basis of the actual fee paid to the processing facility.
Ta prilagoditev je bila narejena na podlagi stroškov, ki so jih za te dejavnosti imeli drugi proizvajalci v vzorcu, ali na podlagi dejanske provizije, ki je bila plačana predelovalnemu obratu.
The results of the comparison on a weighted-average to weighted average basis showed that during the IP the products concerned originating in Norway were sold in the Community at prices which undercut the Community industry’s prices, when expressed as a percentage of the latter, at around 15 % on average.
Rezultati primerjave na podlagi razmerja med tehtanima povprečjema so pokazali, da so bili med obdobjem preiskave zadevni proizvodi, s poreklom iz Norveške, prodani v Skupnosti po cenah, ki so za približno 15 % nelojalno znižale cene industrije Skupnosti, če jih izrazimo kot odstotek zadnjih.
In accordance with Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the examination of the impact of the dumped imports on the Community industry included an evaluation of all economic factors and indices having a bearing on the State of the Community industry during the period considered.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je preiskava učinka dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti vključevala oceno vseh ekonomskih dejavnikov in kazalnikov, ki so vplivali na položaj industrije Skupnosti med obravnavanim obdobjem.
The production, the production capacity and the capacity utilization of the Community industry as a whole developed as follows:
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti kot celote so se razvijale na naslednji način:
Table 5
Tabela 5:
Source: Community industry.
Vir: Industrija Skupnosti.
Production (tonnes)
Proizvodnja (ton)
Production capacity (tonnes)
Proizvodna zmogljivost (ton)
Production of the Community industry first increased by 14 % between 2001 and 2002.
Proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti je prvič narasla za 14 % med letoma 2001 in 2002.
It subsequently decreased by 6 %, but increased again by 5 % in the IP, although remaining below the level of 2002.
Posledično se je znižala za 6 %, vendar se je ponovno zvišala za 5 % v obravnavanem obdobju, čeprav je ostala pod ravnijo iz leta 2002.
As shown in the table above, production overall increased by 13 % during the period considered.
Kot kaže zgornja tabela, je proizvodnja med obravnavanim obdobjem v celoti narasla za 13 %.
During the period considered production capacity increased by 18 %.
Med obravnavanim obdobjem je proizvodna zmogljivost narasla za 18 %.
The main increase took place in 2003 (+ 13 %).
Glavni porast je bil leta 2003 (+ 13 %).
It should be noted that farmed salmon production in the European Community is effectively limited by government licences specifying the maximum amount of live fish which may be held in the water at any place at any point in time.
Treba je opozoriti, da je proizvodnja gojenega lososa v Evropski skupnosti učinkovito omejena z vladnimi dovoljenji, ki določajo največjo količino živih rib, ki jih je dovoljeno imeti v vodi kjer koli in kadar koli.
Capacity figures given are theoretical capacity based on the total quantity licensed rather than the physical fish-holding capacity of the cages and other production material operated by the Community industry.
Dani podatki o zmogljivostih so teoretična zmogljivost, ki temelji na celotni odobreni količini, ter ne fizična zmogljivost kletk in drugega proizvodnega materiala za skladiščenje rib, ki jih upravlja industrija Skupnosti.
It is therefore considered that these capacity figures are not very meaningful in the analysis.
Zato se šteje, da podatki o zmogljivosti v analizi niso zelo smiselni.
Capacity utilisation first increased by 13 % between 2001 and 2002 but decreased in 2003 by around 18 % and remained more or less stable in the IP.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti se je prvič povečala za 13 % med letoma 2001 in 2002, vendar se je leta 2003 zmanjšala za približno 18 % in ostala bolj ali manj stabilna v obravnavanem obdobju.
It should be noted that farmed salmon is practically not stocked by the Community industry, but sold immediately after harvesting to downstream industries.
Treba je opozoriti, da industrija Skupnosti gojenega lososa skoraj ne skladišči, ampak ga takoj po spravljanju proda industrijam v proizvodni verigi za njo.
Therefore the evaluation of stocks does not appear to be a relevant factor in examining the economic situation of the Community industry.
Zato se ocenjevanje zalog ne zdi pomemben dejavnik pri preučevanju gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti.
Sales volume, market shares, average unit prices in the EC and growth
Obseg prodaje, tržni deleži, povprečne cene na enoto v ES in rast
The figures below represent the Community industry’s sales to independent customers on the Community market.
Spodnji podatki predstavljajo prodajo industrije Skupnosti neodvisnim kupcem na trgu Skupnosti.
Table 6
Tabela 6:
Sales volume, market shares, average unit sales prices in the EC
Obseg prodaje, tržni deleži, povprečne prodajne cene na enoto v ES
Source: Community industry with regard to sales volume and market share.
Vir: Industrija Skupnosti v zvezi z obsegom prodaje in tržnim deležem.
With regard to average unit sales prices sampled Community industry on ex-farm level.
V zvezi s povprečnimi prodajnimi cenami na enoto vzorčena industrija Skupnosti na ravni franko ribogojnica.
Sales volume (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje (ton)
Average unit sales prices (EUR/kg)
Povprečne prodajne cene na enoto (EUR/kg)
The Community industry’s sales volumes have increased between 2001 and the IP by 13 %.
Med letom 2001 in obravnavanim obdobjem je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti narasel za 13 %.
In other words, the Community industry was able to increase its sales volume by 2300 tonnes.
Z drugimi besedami, industrija Skupnosti je povečala svoj obseg prodaje za 2300 ton.
This performance should also be seen in the light of the increase in Community consumption which was as high as 80000 tonnes in the same period.
To izvedbo bi bilo treba obravnavati tudi z vidika povečanja porabe Skupnosti, ki je v enakem obdobju znašala 80000 ton.
The market shares of the Community industry overall decreased during the period considered (– 1 %).
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti se je med obravnavanim obdobjem v celoti znižal (– 1 %).
It first increased between 2001 and 2002, then sharply decreased in 2003, and increased again in the IP remaining slightly below the market share of the year 2001.
Prvič se je povečal med letoma 2001 in 2002, nato se je leta 2003 močno zmanjšal in v obdobju preiskave ponovno narasel ter ostal rahlo pod tržnim deležem iz leta 2001.
Given the small market share of the Community industry, it should be noted that every loss, be it even little, has a large impact on the Community industry.
Glede na majhen tržni delež industrije Skupnosti je treba opozoriti, da vsaka izguba, celo zelo majhna, močno vpliva na industrijo Skupnosti.
In the period 2001 to the IP the Community industry’s average sales prices decreased by 6 %.
V obdobju od leta 2001 do obdobja preiskave so se povprečne prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti znižale za 6 %.
The main decrease took place between 2002 and 2003 (– 13 percentage points), while between 2003 and the IP, prices recovered to some extent (+ 8 percentage points).
Največje znižanje je bilo med letoma 2002 in 2003 (- 13 %), medtem ko so se med letom 2003 in obdobjem preiskave cene nekoliko dvignile (+ 9 %).
Over the period considered the Community consumption grew by 15 % and the Community industry increased it sales volume by 13 %.
Med obravnavanim obdobjem je poraba Skupnosti narasla za 15 % in industrija Skupnosti je povečala svoj obseg prodaje za 13 %.
However, during the same period Community sales prices decreased (– 6 %) as well as market share (– 1 %).
Vendar so se v enakem obdobju prodajne cene Skupnosti (– 6 %) kot tudi tržni delež (– 1 %) znižali.