natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed actual prices decreased due to the new rebate scheme introduced by TV2.
Dejanske cene so se res znižale zaradi novega sistema popustov, ki ga je uvedla TV2.
As a result TV2 expanded its capacity utilisation by 33 % over the preceding year.
Tako je TV2 od leta poprej povečala izkoriščenost svojih zmogljivosti za 33 %.
However, the pricing measures led to an increase in its nationwide advertising income of 8,4 %.
Toda cenovni ukrepi so pripeljali do povečanja prihodkov TV2 iz oglaševanja po celotni državi za 8,4 %.
In 2001 TV2 again increased its prices.
Leta 2001 je TV2 spet zvišala svoje cene.
Despite the rising prices TV2's advertising income and capacity utilisation decreased to the level of 1999.
Kljub zvišanim cenam so se prihodki TV2 iz oglaševanja in izkoriščenost njenih zmogljivosti zmanjšali na raven iz leta 1999.
In 2002 TV2 reduced prices again and there was a slight decrease in total turnover in that year.
Leta 2002 je TV2 znova znižala cene in imela na koncu rahlo nižji celotni promet.
However, turnover on the overall advertising market decreased even more.
Toda na celotnem oglaševalskem trgu je bila stopnja manjšega prometa celo večja.
What has been indicated above shows that the use of extensive rebates resulted in a reduction in the actual price level.
Na podlagi zgornjega lahko sklepamo, da je uporaba obsežnih popustov povzročila znižanje dejanske ravni cen.
was able to compensate for the decrease in prices by expanding capacity utilisation.
je znala izravnati to znižanje cen s povečanjem izkoriščenosti svojih zmogljivosti.
Since its competitors lack the same capacity reserve they could not follow suit.
Ker konkurenti niso imeli na razpolago enake rezerve zmogljivosti, niso imeli enakih možnosti.
In order to survive on the market they have had to follow TV2's actions.
Da bi bili uspešni na trgu, so morali slediti ukrepom TV2.
During years when TV2 increased its prices its advertising turnover fell.
V letih, ko je TV2 zvišala svoje cene, je doživela upad svojega skupnega prometa iz oglaševanja.
On the other hand, when TV2 has reduced its prices it was able to increase its total turnover.
Ko pa je TV2 znižala svoje cene, je lahko povečala svoj skupni promet.
The Commission therefore concludes that TV2's price cuts have actually brought it higher overall income.
Komisija zato sklepa, da so znižanja cen, ki jih je uvedla TV2, dejansko pripeljala do višjega skupnega prometa.
As a consequence, TV2's pricing behaviour would not indicate that it refrained from seeking to maximise its income.
Kot posledica tega oblikovanje cen pri TV2 ne kaže, da podjetje ni poskušalo kar najbolj povečati svojih prihodkov.
Television advertising expenditure in Denmark compared to the EU as a whole
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje na Danskem v primerjavi z EU kot celoto
A comparison of prices between the Danish operators and an analysis of TV2's pricing behaviour do not provide evidence whether overall prices on the Danish television advertising market were too low.
Primerjava cen med danskimi operaterji in analiza oblikovanja cen TV2 ne kažeta, ali je bila raven cen na danskem trgu za televizijsko oglaševanje prenizka ali ne.
Such a depressed level of prices could stem from TV2's use of its stronger position to bring down the overall level of television advertising expenditure below where it would have been in a normal competitive situation.
Takšna nizka raven cen bi lahko izhajala iz dejstva, da je TV2 izkoristila svoj superiorni položaj, da je spravila skupno stopnjo izdatkov za televizijsko oglaševanje pod običajno konkurenčno raven.
To address this issue, the Commission analysed economic data on the advertising market in all EU countries and compared these with Denmark.
Komisija je z namenom, da bi obravnavala to vprašanje, analizirala gospodarske podatke, dobljene na oglaševalskem trgu v vseh državah EU, in jih primerjala z Dansko.
As Danish television advertising is most comparable with other Northern countries, the Commission also compared data for Denmark and other Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden and Norway).
Ker je danski oglaševalski trg najbolj primerljiv z drugimi nordijskimi državami, je Komisija opravila tudi primerjavo podatkov med dansko in drugimi nordijskimi državami (Finsko, Švedsko in Norveško).
The key figures for television advertising expenditure that have been analysed are: (1) television advertising expenditure expressed as a share of total advertising expenditure; (2) television advertising expenditure per capita; (3) television advertising expenditure expressed as a percentage of GDP.
Ključne analizirane številke za izdatke za televizijsko oglaševanje so: 1. izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež ( %) skupnih izdatkov za oglaševanje; 2. izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje na osebo; 3. izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež ( ‰) BDP.
The table below gives an overview of these figures:
Spodnja preglednica je pregled teh ključnih številk:
Key figures for television advertising expenditure in Denmark, the EU and other Nordic countries
Ključne številke za izdatke za televizijsko oglaševanje na Danskem, v EU in drugih nordijskih državah
Source: European Audiovisual Observatory, EuroStat.
Vir: European Audiovisual Observatory, EuroStat.
TV advertising expenditure as share of total advertising expenditure (in per cent)
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež (%) skupnih izdatkov za oglaševanje
Nordic
Nordijske države
TV advertising expenditure per capita (in EUR)
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje na osebo (v eurih)
TV advertising expenditure as a percentage share of GDP
Izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež (‰) BDP
The above table shows that the share of advertising out of total advertising expenditure was lower in Denmark (27 %) in comparison to the EU average (37 %).
Iz zgornje preglednice lahko razberemo, da je bil delež oglaševanja iz skupnih izdatkov za oglaševanje na Danskem manjši (27 %) v primerjavi s povprečjem EU (37 %).
However, it also shows that there is a general divide between the north and the south of Europe.
Podatki pa kažejo, da obstaja splošna delitev med severno in južno Evropo.
In the southern Member States television advertising expenditure is considerably higher than in the northern Member States.
V državah članicah na jugu so izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje bistveno večji kakor v državah članicah na severu.
The same pattern can be seen for television advertising expenditure as a portion of GDP.
Enak vzorec je opaziti za izdatke za televizijsko oglaševanje kot delež BDP.
In addition television advertising expenditure per capita shows a marked difference between the Member States.
Tudi izdatki za televizijsko oglaševanje na osebo kažejo veliko razliko med državami članicami.
When these ratios are set in the context of the Nordic countries, the Danish spending pattern is in line with other Nordic countries.
Ko primerjamo ta razmerja v okviru nordijskih držav, je vzorec danskih izdatkov v skladu z vzorcem drugih nordijskih držav.
In view of what has been indicated above, the Commission concludes that there is no clear and equivocal evidence that the Danish television advertising market was systematically and consistently depressed due to TV2's pricing behaviour.
Ob upoštevanju vsega tega Komisija sklepa, da ni jasnih in dvoumnih dokazov o tem, da bi bil danski trg za televizijsko oglaševanje sistematično in stalno v krizi zaradi oblikovanja cen pri TV2.
Inter-media prices
Cene med mediji
The complainant also submitted data comparing contact prices (expressed in CPM) across borders for one media type and across media types in one particular country.
Pritožnik je predložil tudi podatke, ki primerjajo povezane cene (izražene v CPM onkraj meja za eno vrsto sredstev javnega obveščanja in po vseh vrstah sredstev javnega obveščanja v neki državi.
This information compares the cost of contacting 1000 persons by an advertisement using either printed media or television in Denmark, Norway and Sweden.
Podatki, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, primerjajo stroške, s katerimi oglas doseže 1000 posameznikov bodisi z uporabo tiskanih medijev ali televizije na Danskem, Norveškem in Švedskem.
The data show that television advertising is less expensive in Denmark than Sweden and Norway, whereas the opposite is true for print media.
Podatki kažejo, da je televizijsko oglaševanje na Danskem cenejše kakor na Švedskem in Norveškem, obratno pa velja za tiskane medije.
However, the Commission cannot verify the reliability of the data provided and no such data are publicly available.
Komisija pa ne more preveriti zanesljivosti predloženih podatkov in ti podatki niso javno objavljeni.
Since the information is very limited and does not take possible cultural differences into account, the Commission cannot draw any valid conclusions on the level of contact prices for the different media in the Scandinavian countries.
Glede na dejstvo, da so podatki razmeroma omejeni in ne upoštevajo morebitnih kulturnih razlik, Komisija ne more potegniti tehtnih sklepov o ravni povezanih cen za različne medije v skandinavskih državah.
The Commission therefore concludes that TV2 had the highest prices on the Danish market during the period under investigation since it was able to price its product 15 to 40 % higher than its competitors, depending on the size of the target group.
Komisija zato sklepa, da je imela TV2 najvišje cene za oglaševanje na danskem trgu v preiskovanem obdobju, ker je imela možnost postaviti za 15–40 % višjo ceno za svoj proizvod kakor njeni konkurenti, odvisno od dostopa do zadevne ciljne skupine.
In comparison to Sweden and Norway, prices are approximately 20 % lower in Denmark.
V primerjavi s Švedsko in Norveško so cene na Danskem približno 20 % nižje.
On the basis of the above analyses, the Commission concludes that from a State aid perspective there is currently no clear evidence that TV2 did not attempt to maximise its advertising revenue and that this behaviour would have led to an increased need for State funding.
Glede na zgornje analize Komisija sklepa, da z vidika državne pomoči v tem trenutku ni jasnih dokazov o tem, da TV2 ne bi poskušala kar najbolj povečati svojih prihodkov iz oglaševanja in da bi takšno ravnanje pripeljalo do večje potrebe po državnem financiranju.
In any event, the Commission is of the opinion that any loss of TV2's income from advertising activities does not exceed the level of overcompensation already established.
V vsakem primeru Komisija meni, da morebitna izguba dohodka s strani TV2 zaradi njenih oglaševalskih dejavnosti ne presega ravni že ugotovljenega prekomernega nadomestila.
For the reasons set out above, the Commission concludes that the aid covered by this investigation has overcompensated TV2 by an amount of DKK 628,2 million (EUR 84,3 million) and that this amount it is not compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 86(2) and must be recovered.
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov Komisija sklepa, da je bil dodeljen znesek pomoči TV2, ki jo obravnava ta preiskava, previsok za 628,2 milijona DKK ((84,3 milijona EUR), in da ta znesek ni združljiv s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 86(2), zato ga je treba vrniti.
Regarding the person from whom the amount must be recovered, the Commission notes that in December 2003, when TV2 altered its legal status by incorporation as the limited liability company TV2/Danmark A/S (hereinafter referred to as TV2 A/S), the full amount of the advantage was transferred to TV2 A/S.
Kar zadeva dejstvo, kdo mora vrniti ta znesek, Komisija navaja, da je TV2 decembra 2003 spremenila svoj pravni status, ker je bila združena v družbo z omejeno odgovornostjo TV2/DANMARK A/S (v nadaljevanju „TV2 A/S“), in se je celotni znesek te ugodnosti prenesel na TV2 A/S.
It follows that the full amount of the overcompensation now benefits TV2 A/S and must be recovered from it.
Celotni znesek prekomerne pomoči bremeni zdaj TV2 A/S, zato bi ga moralo vrniti to podjetje.
The amount of the overcompensation has been calculated annually, on the basis the situation at the end of each year (31 December).
Znesek prekomerne pomoči se je izračunal na letni osnovi, ki predstavlja stanje ob koncu vsakega leta (31. decembra).
This date must be applied for calculating interest,
Za izračun obresti je treba uporabiti ta datum –
The aid granted between 1995 and 2002 to TV2/Danmark in the form of licence fee resources and the other measures described in this Decision is compatible with the common market under Article 86(2) of the Treaty with the exception of an amount of DKK 628,2 million.
Pomoč, dodeljena TV2/DANMARK v obdobju od leta 1995 do leta 2002 prek naročnin in drugih ukrepov, opisanih v tej odločbi, je združljiva s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 86(2) Pogodbe, razen zneska v višini 628,2 milijona DKK.
Denmark shall take all the measures necessary to recover the said amount of DKK 628,2 million.
Danska bo ukrenila vse potrebno, da ji TV2 A/S vrne omenjeni znesek v višini 628,2 milijona DKK.
Recovery shall be effected without delay in accordance with the procedures under national law, provided these allow the immediate and effective implementation of this Decision.
Vračilo se izvrši takoj v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, če slednji dopuščajo takojšnje in veljavno izvajanje te odločbe.
The amount to be recovered shall bear interest throughout the period running from the date on which it was first put at the disposal of the recipient until its actual recovery.
Znesek, ki ga je treba vrniti, bremenijo obresti za celotno obdobje, ki poteka od datuma, ko je upravičenec dobil na razpolago prve dele zneska, do njihovega dejanskega vračila.
The compound interest shall therefore be calculated starting from the first year when overcompensation occurred.
Obresti se izračunajo z obrestnimi obrestmi, ki začnejo teči od prvega leta, ko se je prvič pojavilo prekomerno nadomestilo.
For subsequent years, interest shall be correspondingly payable on all other amounts of overcompensation provided in that year.
Za vsa naslednja leta se obresti zaračunavajo podobno za vsak dodatni znesek, s katerim se je dodelilo prekomerno nadomestilo v nekem letu.
The interest to be recovered under paragraph 3 shall be calculated in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 9 and 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti, za katere se zahteva vračilo v skladu z odstavkom 3, se izračunajo v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členih 9 in 11 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Denmark shall inform the Commission within two months following notification of this Decision of the measures planned and already taken to comply with it.
Danska obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po notifikaciji te odločbe o ukrepih, ki jih načrtuje in jih je že sprejela, da bi bila v skladu s to odločbo.
It shall provide this information using the questionnaire in the Annex to this Decision.
Te podatke bo predložila v vprašalniku iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
OJ C 59, 14.3.2003, p. 2.
UL C 59, 14.3.2003, str. 2.
By Act No 335 of 4 June 1986, which entered into force on 1 July 1986.
Z Zakonom št. 335 z dne 4. junija 1986, ki je začel veljati dne 1. julija 1986.
Act No 578 of 24 June 1994, as amended by Act No 666 of 5 July 1996, Act No 75 of 29 January 1997, Act No 138 of 19 February 1998, Act No 208 of 6 April 1999, Act No 551 of 20 June 2000, Act No 203 of 22 March 2001, Act No 701 of 15 July 2001 and Act No 1052 of 17 December 2002.
Zakon št. 578 z dne 24. junija 1994, kakor je bil spremenjen z Zakonom št. 666 z dne 5. julija 1996, Zakonom št. 75 z dne 29. januarja 1997, Zakonom št. 138 z dne 19. februarja 1998, Zakonom št. 208 z dne 6. aprila 1999, Zakonom št. 551 z dne 20. junija 2000, Zakonom št. 203 z dne 22. marca 2001, Zakonom št. 701 z dne 15. julija 2001 in Zakonom št. 1052 z dne 17. decembra 2002.
Section 18(1) of the Broadcasting Act.
Oddelek 18(1) Zakona o oddajanju.
Section 6a(2) of the Broadcasting Act.
Oddelek 6a(2) Zakona o oddajanju.
Order No 1346 of 18 December 2000.
Odredba št. 1346 z dne 18. decembra 2000.
Order No 874 of 9 December 1998 on radio and television services provided by satellite or cable; Order No 1349 of 18 December 2000 on local radio and television services.
Odredba št. 874 z dne 9. decembra 1998 o radijskih in televizijskih storitvah prek satelita ali kabla; Odredba št. 1349 z dne 18. decembra 2000 o lokalnih radijskih in televizijskih storitvah.
Section 6e and Section 6e(5) of the Broadcasting Act.
Oddelka 6e in 6e(5) Zakona o oddajanju.
Order No 740 of 21 August 2001 on keeping separate accounts for Danmarks Radio's and TV2's public service activities and any other activities, adopted for the implemention of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 75).
Odredba št. 740 z dne 21. avgusta 2001 za izvajanje Direktive Komisije 2000/52/ES (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 75) o ločenem računovodstvu za izvajanje javnih storitev in za izvajanje drugih storitev Danmarks Radio in TV2.
Sections 61 to 63 of the Broadcasting Act.
Oddelki 61–63 Zakona o oddajanju.
Section 38 of the Act on radio communications and the assignment of radio frequencies and Section 48 of the Radio Frequencies Act.
Oddelek 38 danskega Zakona o radijskih komunikacijah in dodeljevanju radijskih frekvenc ter oddelek 48 danskega Zakona o radijskih frekvencah.
The Media Agreement 1997 to 2000.
Sporazum o sredstvih javnega obveščanja 1997–2000.
Introduced by Act No 1208 of 27 December 1996 and incorporated in Section 60a of the 1997 version of the Broadcasting Act and repealed on 1 January 2002 by Act No 259 of 8 May 2002.
Uvedeno z Zakonom št. 1208 z dne 27. decembra 1996 in vključeno v oddelek 60a različice Zakona o oddajanju iz leta 1997 ter razveljavljeno 1. januarja 2002 z Zakonom št. 259 z dne 8. maja 2002.
The rate of the fee was set per inhabitant of the local area covered by the fee and increased every year.
Stopnja pristojbine je bila določena na prebivalca lokalnega območja, pokritega s pristojbino, in povečana vsako leto.
Advertisers can purchase advertising time on Danish television stations on two bases: gross rating points (GRPs), which refer to the total audience of 12 years and over, or target rating points (TRPs), which refer to a narrower target group.
Oglaševalci lahko zakupijo oglaševalski čas na danskih televizijskih postajah na dva načina – s točkami bruto gledanosti (Gross Rating Points – GRP), ki se nanaša na celotno število gledalcev od starosti 12 let, ali s točkami ciljne gledanosti (Target Rating Points – TRP), ki se nanaša na ožjo ciljno skupino.
is the only station in Denmark that also sells time on the basis of GRPs.
je edina televizijska postaja na Danskem, ki prodaja tudi z GRP.
Judgment of the Court of 13 March 2001 Case C-379/98 PreussenElektra AG v Schleswag AG [2001] ECR I-2099, in particular paragraph 61.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. marca 2001, zadeva C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG proti Schleswag AG, [2001] PSES I-2099, predvsem odstavek 61.
Judgment of the Court of 16 May 2000 Case C-83/98 French Republic v Ladbroke Racing Ltd and Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR I-3271, paragraph 50.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2000, zadeva C-83/98, Francoska republika proti Ladbroke Racing Ltd in Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [2000] PSES I-3271, predvsem odstavek 50.
See point 17 of the Communication from the Commission on the application of State aid rules to public service broadcasting and Commission Decision (EC) No 631/2001 of 22 May 2002 concerning the BBC licence fee.
Glej točko 17 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil državne pomoči za storitve javne radiotelevizije in Odločbo Komisije št. 631/2001 z dne 22. maja 2002 v zvezi z naročninami BBC.
See in particular paragraph 58.
Op. cit., predvsem odstavek 58.
Point 10 of the Commission Notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
Točka 10 Sporočila Komisije o uporabi pravil državnih pomoči za ukrepe, ki se nanašajo na neposredno obdavčenje podjetij (UL C 384, 10.12.1998, str. 3).
Point 2.1.2 of the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 7).
Točka 2.1.2. Sporočila Komisije o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki jamstev (UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 7).
See Aid No NN 70/98, ‘State aid to public broadcasting channels Kinderkanal and Phoenix’ ( OJ C 238, 21. 8.1999, p. 3).
Glej Pomoč št. NN 70/98, „Državna pomoč za javno oddajanje televizijskih programov‚ ‚Kinderkanal in Phoenix‘‟ ( UL C 238, 21.8.1999, str. 3).
Judgment of the Court of 24 July 2003 Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-7747.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003, zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH in Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht, [2003] PSES I-7747.
Judgment of the Court of 13 July 1988 Case 102/87 French Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1988] ECR 4067 and Order of the President of the Court of 17 March 1989 Case 303/88 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1989] ECR 801.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. julija 1988, zadeva 102/87, Francoska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [1988] PSES-4067, in Sklep predsednika Sodišča z dne 17. marca 1989, zadeva 303/88, Italijanska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [1989] PSES-801.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2002 Joined Cases T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 and T-300/00 Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) and SIC — Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) v Commission of the European Communities [2002] ECR II-3805.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. oktobra 2002, združene zadeve T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 in T-300/00, Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) in SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [2002] PSES II-3805.
Judgment of the Court of 17 September 1980 Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11; Judgment of the Court of 21 March 1991 Case C-303/88 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; Judgment of the Court of 19 September 2000 Case C-156/98 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 33.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980, zadeva 730/79, Philip Morris Holland BV proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [1980] PSES-2671, odstavek 11; Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991, zadeva C-303/88, Italijanska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [1991] PSES I-1433, odstavek 17; Sodba Sodišča z dne 19. septembra 2000, zadeva C-156/98, Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [2000] PSES I-6857, odstavek 33.
Altmark see paragraphs 101 to 109.
Altmark op. cit., odstavki 101–109.
Judgment of the Court of 27 March 1974 Case 127-73 Belgische Radio en Televisie v SV SABAM and NV Fonior [1974] ECR 313.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. marca 1974, zadeva 127-73, Belgische Radio en Televisie proti SV SABAM in NV Fonior, [1974] ECR 313.
Recital 14 of Commission Decision 97/606/EC of 26 June 1997 pursuant to Article 90(3) of the EC Treaty on the exclusive right to broadcast television advertising in Flanders (OJ L 244, 6.9.1997, p. 18).
Odstavek 14 Odločbe Komisije 97/606/ES z dne 26. junija 1997 v skladu s členom 90(3) Pogodbe ES o izključni pravici do predvajanja televizijskih oglasov v Flandriji (UL L 244, 6.9.1997, str. 18).
Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 75).
Direktiva Komisije 2000/52/ES z dne 26. julija 2000 o spremembi Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 75).
Point 53 of the Broadcasting Communication.
Točka 53 Sporočila o oddajanju.