natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(Only the Spanish, German, Greek, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedila v španskem, nemškem, grškem, francoskem, nizozemskem, portugalskem, finskem in švedskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 8(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section [3] provide that the Commission is to make the necessary verifications, inform the Member States of its findings, take account of the Member States' comments, initiate bilateral discussions with a view to reaching agreement with the Member States concerned and then formally communicate its conclusions to them, referring to Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section [4].
Člen 5 Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 in člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999, kot tudi člen 8(1) in (2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1663/95 z dne 7. julija 1995 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 v zvezi s postopkom za potrditev obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS [3] določajo, da Komisija opravi potrebna preverjanja, državam članicam sporoči rezultate teh preverjanj, upošteva pripombe držav članic, začne dvostranske razprave za dogovor z zadevnimi državami članicami in le-tem uradno sporoči svoje zaključke sklicujoč se na Odločbo Komisije 94/442/ES z dne 1. julija 1994 o določitvi spravnega postopka v zvezi s potrjevanjem obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada [4].
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than 24 months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the checks to the Member States.
Treba je navesti zneske, ki se ne pokrivajo iz Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS in se ne nanašajo na izdatke, nastale več kot štiriindvajset mesecev pred pisnim sporočilom, v katerem je Komisija države članice obvestila o rezultatih preverjanj.
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgments of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 15 October 2006 and relating to its content,
Ta odločba ne vpliva na finančne posledice, ki bi jih Komisija lahko imela zaradi sodb Sodišča v primerih, ki so 15. oktobra 2006 še nerešeni in se nanašajo na zadeve iz te odločbe –
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Portuguese Republic and the Republic of Finland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Helensko republiko, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Portugalsko republiko in Republiko Finsko.
Total corrections — Budget item 6701
Skupaj popravki – Proračunska postavka 6701
Deductions already made
Že izvedeni odbitki
Financial impact
Finančne posledice
Financial audit — Late payments
Finančna revizija – Zapoznela plačila
one-off
enkratno
Financial audit — Clearance of accounts
Finančna revizija – Potrditev obračunov
Clearance of EAGGF Guarantee accounts for financial year 2002
Potrditev obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS za proračunsko leto 2002
Financial audit — Overshooting
Finančna revizija – Prekoračitev
Overshooting of the financial ceilings
Prekoračitev zgornje meje finančnih sredstev
Fruit and Veg's — Fig & Prune Processing
Sadje in zelenjava – Predelava fig in sliv
Fruit and Veg's — Peach & Pear Processing
Sadje in zelenjava – Predelava breskev in hrušk
Fruit and Veg's — Tomato Processing
Sadje in zelenjava – Predelava paradižnikov
Fruit and Veg's — Withdrawals
Sadje in zelenjava – Umiki
Control does not cover the final use of distributed product
Končna uporaba trženega proizvoda ni nadzorovana
flat-rate
pavšalno
Failure to meet environmental conditions
Neupoštevanje okoljskih razmer
Unsatisfactory quality of controls carried out on withdrawn product
Nezadovoljiva kakovost nadzora umaknjenega proizvoda
Arable Crops
Poljščine
Undue application of a tolerance for administrative cross-checks, shortcoming in controls on eligibility criteria
Neprimerna uporaba dovoljenega odstopanja pri upravnem navzkrižnem preverjanju, nezadosten nadzor meril o upravičenosti
Butterfats in Food Processing
Maslene maščobe v predelavi hrane
Reimbursement following erroneous calculation of financial correction (Commission Decision 2006/334/EC)
Povračilo zaradi napačnega izračuna finančnega popravka (Odločba Komisije 2006/334/ES)
Weaknesses in controls on producer organisations and processors
Nezadovoljiv nadzor v organizacijah proizvajalcev in predelovalcev
Weaknesses in quality controls
Pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru kakovosti
Non-eligible payments
Neupravičena plačila
Shortcomings in controls of areas sown and failure to ensure compatibility with IACS
Pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru zasejanih površin in neskladnost z IAKS
Fruit and Veg's — Processed dried grape products (other measures)
Sadje in zelenjava – Predelani proizvodi iz rozin (drugi ukrepi)
Overestimated area, lack of geographical location for parcel identification, unsatisfactory control of harvested grape destination
Precenitev površine, odsotnost zemljepisnega položaja za identifikacijo parcel, pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru namembnega kraja obranega grozdja
Fruit and Veg's — Citrus Processing
Sadje in zelenjava – Predelava citrusov
Weaknesses in accounting controls on producer organisations and processors
Pomanjkljiv računovodski nadzor v organizacijah proizvajalcev in predelovalcev
Olive Oil — Production aid
Oljčno olje – Proizvodna pomoč
Computer files are not operational, crop declarations controls are ineffective
Računalniške datoteke ne delujejo, nadzor prijav pridelka ni učinkovit
RD Guarantee new measures
Jamstveni sklad za razvoj podeželja – novi ukrepi
Ineligible expenditure claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF
Neupravičeni izdatki, ki se jih uveljavlja v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS
Expenditure approved under the Guidance Section, but claimed under the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF
Neupravičeni izdatki, ki se jih uveljavlja v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS
Inadequate verification of the eligibility of claims paid for durum wheat
Neustrezno preverjanje upravičenosti zahtevkov, plačanih za pšenico durum
Fruit and Veg's — Operational Funds
Sadje in zelenjava – Operativni skladi
Failure to meet deadlines
Neupoštevanje plačilnih rokov
on the continuation in the year 2007 of Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of Prunus domestica L. and of Malus Mill. under Council Directive 92/34/EEC started in 2003 and 2004
o nadaljevanju primerjalnih poskusov in testiranj Skupnosti pri razmnoževalnem in sadilnem materialu vrst Prunus domestica L. in Malus Mill. v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/34/EGS, ki so se začeli leta 2003 in 2004, v letu 2007
Having regard to Commission Decision 2002/745/EC of 5 September 2002 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on propagating and planting material of fruit plants under Council Directive 92/34/EEC [2], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2002/745/ES z dne 5. septembra 2002 o postopkih za primerjalne poskuse in testiranje razmnoževalnega in sadilnega materiala sadnih rastlin Skupnosti po Direktivi Sveta 92/34/EGS [2] in zlasti člena 3 Odločbe,
Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. pursuant to Council Directive 92/34/EEC [3], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Batsch, Malus Mill. in Rubus idaeus L. v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/34/EGS [3], in zlasti člena 3 Odločbe,
Decision 2002/745/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Prunus domestica L. from 2003 to 2007.
Z Odločbo 2002/745/ES so določeni postopki za primerjalne poskuse in testiranja, ki se bodo izvajali v skladu z Direktivo 92/34/EGS za vrsto Prunus domestica L. od leta 2003 do leta 2007.
Tests and trials carried out in 2003 to 2006 should be continued in 2007.
Testiranja in poskuse, ki so se izvajali v letih od 2003 do 2006, je treba nadaljevati v letu 2007.
Decision 2003/894/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Directive 92/34/EEC as regards Malus Mill. from 2004 to 2008.
Z Odločbo 2003/894/ES so določeni postopki za primerjalne poskuse in testiranja, ki se bodo izvajali v skladu z Direktivo 92/34/ES za vrsto Malus Mill. od leta 2004 do leta 2008.
Tests and trials carried out in 2004 to 2006 should be continued in 2007,
Testiranja in poskuse, izvedene v letih od 2002 do 2006, je treba nadaljevati v letu 2007 –
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2003 on propagating and planting material of Prunus domestica L. shall be continued in 2007 in accordance with Decision 2002/745/EC.
V skladu z Odločbo 2002/745/ES se primerjalni poskusi in testiranja Skupnosti pri razmnoževalnem in sadilnem materialu vrste Prunus domestica L., ki so se začeli izvajati v letu 2003, nadaljujejo v letu 2007.
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2004 on propagating and planting material of Malus Mill. shall be continued in 2007 in accordance with Decision 2003/894/EC.
V skladu z Odločbo 2001/894/ES se primerjalni poskusi in testiranja Skupnosti pri razmnoževalnem in sadilnem materialu vrste Malus Mill., ki so se začeli izvajati v letu 2004, nadaljujejo v letu 2007.
on the continuation in the year 2007 of Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of Asparagus officinalis L. under Council Directive 2002/55/EC started in 2005
o nadaljevanju primerjalnih poskusov in testiranj Skupnosti pri semenu in razmnoževalnem materialu vrste Asparagus officinalis L. v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2002/55/ES, ki so se začeli v letu 2007
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed [1],
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/55/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena zelenjadnic [1],
Having regard to Commission Decision 2005/5/EC of 27 December 2004 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of certain plants of agricultural and vegetable species and vine under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 92/33/EEC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC for the years 2005 to 2009 [2], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2005/5/ES z dne 27. decembra 2004 o postopkih Skupnosti za primerjalne poskuse in testiranje semen in razmnoževalnem materialu nekaterih sort poljščin in zelenjadnih vrst in trte v skladu z Direktivami Sveta 66/401/EGS, 66/402/EGS, 68/193/EGS, 92/33/EGS, 2002/54/ES, 2002/55/ES, 2002/56/ES in 2002/57/ES za leta od 2005 do 2009 [2] in zlasti člena 3 Odločbe,
Decision 2005/5/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to be carried out under Council Directive 2002/55/EC as regards Asparagus officinalis L. from 2005 to 2009.
Odločba 2005/5/ES določa ureditev primerjalnih poskusov in testiranj, ki se v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2002/55/ES za vrsto Asparagus officinalis L. izvajajo v letih od 2005 do 2009.
Tests and trials carried out in 2005 and 2006 should be continued in 2007,
Testiranja in poskuse, ki so se izvajali v letih 2005 in 2006, je treba nadaljevati v letu 2007 –
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2005 on seeds and propagating material of Asparagus officinalis L. shall be continued in 2007 in accordance with Decision 2005/5/EC.
V skladu z Odločbo 2005/5/ES se primerjalni poskusi in testiranja Skupnosti pri semenu in razmnoževalnem materialu vrste Asparagus officinalis L, ki so se začeli izvajati v letu 2005, nadaljujejo v letu 2007.
(notified under document number C(2006) 6498)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6498)
Appendix B to Annex XII to the 2003 Act of Accession has been amended by Commission Decisions 2004/458/EC [2], 2004/471/EC [3], 2004/474/EC [4], 2005/271/EC [5], 2005/591/EC [6], 2005/854/EC [7], 2006/14/EC [8], 2006/196/EC [9], 2006/404/EC [10] and 2006/555/EC [11].
Dodatek B k Prilogi XII k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 je bil spremenjen z odločbami Komisije 2004/458/ES [2], 2004/471/ES [3], 2004/474/ES [4], 2005/271/ES [5], 2005/591/ES [6], 2005/854/ES [7], 2006/14/ES [8], 2006/196/ES [9], 2006/404/ES [10] in 2006/555/ES [11].
According to an official declaration from the Polish competent authority certain establishments in the meat, fish and milk sectors have completed their upgrading process and are now in full compliance with Community legislation.
Glede na uradno izjavo poljskega pristojnega organa so nekateri obrati v sektorjih mesa, rib in mleka zaključili postopek posodabljanja in so zdaj v celoti usklajeni z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 52; corrected by OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 39.
UL L 156, 30.4.2004, str. 52.
OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 58; corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 31.
UL L 160, 30.4.2004, str. 58.
OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 74; corrected by OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 44.
UL L 160, 30.4.2004, str. 74.
OJ L 218, 9.8.2006, p. 17.
UL L 218, 9.8.2006, str. 17.
Meat establishmments
Obrati za proizvodnjo mesa
on the clearance of the accounts of certain paying agencies in Germany and the United Kingdom concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, for the 2003 financial year
o potrditvi obračunov nekaterih plačilnih agencij v Nemčiji in Združenem kraljestvu v zvezi z izdatki, financiranimi iz Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) za proračunsko leto 2003
(notified under document number C(2006) 6506)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 6506)
(Only the German and English texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem in nemškem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Commission Decisions 2004/451/EC [2] and 2005/738/EC [3] cleared, for the 2003 financial year, the accounts of all the paying agencies except for the German paying agency ‘Bayern-Umwelt’ and the British paying agencies ‘DARD’ and ‘NAW’.
Z odločbama Komisije 2004/451/ES [2] in 2005/738/ES [3] so bili za proračunsko leto 2003 potrjeni obračuni vseh plačilnih agencij, razen za nemško plačilno agencijo „Bayern-Umwelt“ ter britanski plačilni agenciji „DARD“ in „NAW“.
Following the transmission of new information by Germany and the United Kingdom, and after additional checks, the Commission can now take a decision on the integrality, accuracy and veracity of the accounts submitted by the German paying agency ‘Bayern-Umwelt’ and the British paying agencies ‘DARD’ and ‘NAW’.
Potem ko sta Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo poslala nove informacije in po izvedbi dodatnih preverjanj, lahko Komisija odloča o celovitosti, točnosti in verodostojnosti obračunov, ki so jih predložile nemška plačilna agencija „Bayern-Umwelt“ in britanski plačilni agenciji „DARD“ in „NAW“.
In clearing the accounts of the German and British paying agencies concerned, the Commission must take account of the amounts already withheld from Germany and the United Kingdom on the basis of Decision 2004/451/EC and Decision 2005/738/EC.
Pri potrditvi obračunov zadevne nemške plačilne agencije in zadevnih britanskih plačilnih agencij mora Komisija upoštevati zneske, ki sta jih Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo že zadržali na podlagi Odločbe 2004/451/ES in Odločbe 2005/738/ES.
In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, this Decision does not prejudice to decisions adopted subsequently by the Commission excluding from Community financing expenditure not effected in accordance with Community rules,
V skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 7(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999 ta odločba ne posega v poznejše odločitve Komisije, s katerimi se iz financiranja Skupnosti izločijo izdatki, ki niso bili izvedeni v skladu s predpisi Skupnosti –
The accounts of the German paying agency ‘Bayern-Umwelt’ and the British paying agencies ‘DARD’ and ‘NAW’ concerning expenditure financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, for the 2003 financial year are hereby cleared.
Potrdijo se obračuni nemške plačilne agencije „Bayern-Umwelt“ ter britanskih plačilnih agencij „DARD“ in „NAW“ v zvezi z izdatki, financiranih iz Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) za proračunsko leto 2003.
The amounts which are recoverable from, or payable to, each of the Member States concerned pursuant to this Decision are set out in the Annex.
Zneski, ki se izterjajo od vsake države članice ali plačajo vsaki državi članici v skladu s to odločbo, so opredeljeni v Prilogi I.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo in Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
OJ L 193, 1.6.2004, p. 102.
UL L 193, 1.6.2004, str. 102.
OJ L 276, 21.10.2005, p. 58.
UL L 276, 21.10.2005, str. 58.
Amount recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under Decision 2005/738/EC
Znesek, izterjan od (–) ali plačan (+) državi članici v skladu z Odločbo 2005/738/ES
Amomunt to be recovered from (–) or paid to (+) the Member State under this Decision [1]
Znesek za izterjavo (–) ali plačilo (+) državi članici v skladu s to odločbo [1]
= expenditure declared in the monthly declaration
= odhodki, prijavljeni v emesečnem poročilu
For calculating the amount to be recovered from or paid to the Member State, the amount considered is either the total of the annual declaration for cleared expenditure (column a) or the aggregate of the monthly declarations for disjoined expenditure (column b).
Za izračun zneska za izterjavo ali plačilo državam članicam je upoštevani znesek celotni znesek letnega poročila za potrjene odhodke (stolpec a) ali skupni znesek mesečnih poročil za ločene odhodke (stolpec b)
The reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the system of advances, to which are added, in particular, corrections for failure to meet the payment deadlines established in August, September and October 2003.
Znižanja in opustitve so predvsem tisti, ki so upoštevani v sistemu predplačil, h katerim se dodajo predvsem popravki zaradi nespoštovanja plačilnih rokov za mesece avgust, september in oktober 2003
Total (= j)
Skupaj (= j)
Applicable exchange rate: Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2006.
Menjalni tečaj: Člen 7 (2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 883/2006.
of 5 July 2005
z dne 5 julij 2005
on State aid C 20/04 (ex NN 25/04) in favour of Huta Częstochowa SA
o državni pomoči št. C 20/04 (prej NN 25/04) za Huta Częstochowa S.A.
(notified under document number C(2005) 1962)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 1962)
(Only the Polish version is authentic)
(Besedilo v poljskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to Protocol No 8 of the Accession Treaty on the restructuring of the Polish steel industry (hereinafter referred to as ‘Protocol No 8’).
ob upoštevanju Protokola št. 8 k Pristopni pogodbi o prestrukturiranju poljske jeklarske industrije (v nadaljevanju „Protokol št. 8“),
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above and having regard to their comments.
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi določbami in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 4 August 2003 the Commission requested information on the control of state aid in Poland including, if applicable, measures to restructure the recipient.
V dopisu z dne 4. avgusta 2003 je Komisija zaprosila za informacije o nadzorovanju državne pomoči na Poljskem, vključno z, če je to primerno, ukrepi za prestrukturiranje prejemnika.
Thereafter the matter was discussed by the Commission and the Polish authorities at various technical meetings and formed the subject of intensive correspondence between the Commission and Poland.
Nato so Komisija in poljske oblasti razpravljale o tem vprašanju na različnih tehničnih sestankih in oblikovale predmet intenzivne korespondence med Komisijo in Poljsko.
On 23 January 2004 the consultant in charge of the independent evaluation of the restructuring programme in Poland under Protocol No 8 submitted his assessment of the case to the Commission.
Dne 23. januarja 2004 je strokovnjak, odgovoren za neodvisno ovrednotenje programa prestrukturiranja Poljske, v skladu s Protokolom št. 8 predložil svojo oceno zadeve Komisiji.
By letter dated 19 May 2004 the Commission informed Poland that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the measures and asked for information to be provided on a number of matters.
V dopisu z dne 19. maja 2004 je Komisija sporočila Poljski, da bo sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES glede ukrepov in zahtevala, da se zagotovijo informacije o številnih vprašanjih.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] OJ C 204, 12.8.2004, p. 6.
Odločitev Komisije, da bo sprožila postopek, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] UL C 204, 12.8.2004, str. 6.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe o ukrepu.
By letter of 26 June 2004, Poland replied to the questions raised.
V dopisu z dne 26. junija 2004 se je Poljska odzvala na zastavljena vprašanja.
Poland also requested a Commission decision under point 10 of Protocol No 8 obtaining agreement to amend the Polish national iron and steel restructuring programme.
Poljska je prav tako zahtevala odločbo Komisije iz točke 10 Protokola št. 8 za dosego dogovora za spremembo poljskega nacionalnega programa prestrukturiranja železa in jekla.
The Commission received comments from interested parties and forwarded them to Poland by letter of 27 September 2004.
Komisija je prejela pripombe zainteresiranih strank in jih v dopisu z dne 27. septembra 2004 posredovala Poljski.
By letter dated 22 November 2004, Poland replied to the comments from interested parties.
V dopisu z dne 22. novembra 2004 je Poljska odgovorila na pripombe zainteresiranih strank.
The Commission subsequently met the Polish authorities on several occasions.
Kasneje so se Komisija in poljske oblasti večkrat srečale.
Additional information was eventually provided by letter of 8 June 2005.
Z dopisom z dne 8. junija 2005 so bile sčasoma zagotovljene dodatne informacije.
The recipient is a company in difficulties, namely steel producer Huta Częstochowa S.A (hereinafter referred to as ‘HCz’; see point 2 a).
Prejemnik je podjetje v težavah, proizvajalec jekla Huta Częstochowa S.A (v nadaljevanju „HCz“; glej točko 2a).
Two types of measure are concerned: the financial restructuring of HCz (see point 3) and several other direct measures (see point 4).
Gre za dve vrsti ukrepov: finančno prestrukturiranje HCz (glej točko 3) in več drugih neposrednih ukrepov (glej točko 4).
The ‘restructuring’ took place in three phases, of which only the last one is of interest for the purposes of monitoring state aid: A first attempt in November 2001 under a court-led conciliation procedure ended in a fiasco.
„Prestrukturiranje“ je potekalo v treh stopnjah, od katerih je samo tretja aktualna za namene nadzorovanja državne pomoči: Prvi poskus novembra 2001 v okviru spravnega postopka, ki ga je vodilo sodišče, ni uspel.
As a result, HCz was obliged to file for bankruptcy in October 2002.
Posledično je HCz moral oktobra 2002 prijaviti stečaj.