natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the applicant has filed another application for asylum stating other personal data; or
je prosilec vložil drugo prošnjo za azil, v kateri je navedel druge osebne podatke; ali
the applicant has not produced information establishing with a reasonable degree of certainty his/her identity or nationality, or it is likely that, in bad faith, he/she has destroyed or disposed of an identity or travel document that would have helped establish his/her identity or nationality; or
prosilec ni priskrbel podatkov, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče z razumno stopnjo verjetnosti ugotoviti njegovo identiteto ali državljanstvo, ali če je verjetno, da je zlonamerno uničil ali odsvojil osebni dokument ali potno listino, ki bi pomagala pri ugotavljanju njegove identitete ali državljanstva; ali
the applicant has made inconsistent, contradictory, improbable or insufficient representations which make his/her claim clearly unconvincing in relation to his/her having been the object of persecution referred to in Directive 2004/83/EC; or
so bile prosilčeve navedbe nekonsistentne, protislovne, malo verjetne ali nezadostne, zaradi česar je njegova prošnja očitno neprepričljiva glede trditve, da je prosilec žrtev preganjanja v smislu Direktive 2004/83/ES; ali
the applicant has submitted a subsequent application which does not raise any relevant new elements with respect to his/her particular circumstances or to the situation in his/her country of origin; or
je prosilec vložil naknadno prošnjo, ki ne navaja nikakršnih novih pomembnih elementov o okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ali o razmerah v njegovi izvorni državi; ali
the applicant has failed without reasonable cause to make his/her application earlier, having had opportunity to do so; or
prosilec brez upravičenega razloga ni vložil svoje prošnje že prej, če je imel za to možnost; ali
the applicant is making an application merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of an earlier or imminent decision which would result in his/her removal; or
je prosilec vložil prošnjo samo zaradi tega, da bi odložil ali onemogočil izvršitev prejšnje ali skorajšnje odločbe, na podlagi katere bi moral biti odstranjen; ali
the applicant has failed without good reason to comply with obligations referred to in Article 4(1) and (2) of Directive 2004/83/EC or in Articles11(2)(a) and (b) and 20(1) of this Directive; or
prosilec brez pravega razloga ni uspel izpolniti obveznosti iz člena 4(1) in (2) Direktive 2004/83/ES ali iz členov 11(2)(a) in (b) ter 20(1) te direktive; ali
the applicant entered the territory of the Member State unlawfully or prolonged his/her stay unlawfully and, without good reason, has either not presented himself/herself to the authorities and/or filed an application for asylum as soon as possible, given the circumstances of his/her entry; or
je prosilec nezakonito vstopil na ozemlje države članice ali nezakonito podaljšal svoje bivanje in se brez pravega razloga ni javil oblastem in/ali vložil prošnje za azil v najkrajšem možnem času glede na okoliščine njegovega vstopa; ali
the applicant is a danger to the national security or public order of the Member State, or the applicant has been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of public security and public order under national law; or
prosilec predstavlja grožnjo za nacionalno varnost ali javni red države članice ali če je bil prosilec zaradi resnih razlogov javne varnosti in javnega reda po nacionalnem pravu prisilno izgnan; ali
the applicant refuses to comply with an obligation to have his/her fingerprints taken in accordance with relevant Community and/or national legislation; or
prosilec noče izpolniti obveznosti dati prstne odtise v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti in/ali nacionalno zakonodajo; ali
the application was made by an unmarried minor to whom Article 6(4)(c) applies, after the application of the parents or parent responsible for the minor has been rejected and no relevant new elements were raised with respect to his/her particular circumstances or to the situation in his/her country of origin.
je prošnjo vložil neporočen mladoletnik, za katerega se uporablja člen 6(4)(c), potem ko je bila prošnja staršev ali starša, ki zanj odgovarja(-ta), zavrnjena, in v njej ni navedel nikakršnih novih pomembnih elementov o okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ali o razmerah v njegovi izvorni državi.
Specific procedures
Posebni postopki
Member States may provide for the following specific procedures derogating from the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II:
Države članice lahko predvidijo naslednje posebne postopke, ki odstopajo od temeljnih načel in jamstev iz Poglavja II:
a preliminary examination for the purposes of processing cases considered within the framework set out in Section IV;
predhodno obravnavo za obravnavanje primerov, ki se rešujejo v okviru Oddelka IV;
procedures for the purposes of processing cases considered within the framework set out in Section V.
postopke za obravnavanje primerov, ki se rešujejo v okviru Oddelka V.
Member States may also provide a derogation in respect of Section VI.
Države članice lahko predvidijo odstopanje tudi za primere iz Oddelka VI.
Inadmissible applications
Nedopustne prošnje
In addition to cases in which an application is not examined in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 343/2003, Member States are not required to examine whether the applicant qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Directive 2004/83/EC where an application is considered inadmissible pursuant to this Article.
Poleg primerov, v katerih se prošnja ne preučuje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 343/2003, se od držav članic ne zahteva, da preučijo, ali prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za begunca v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES, kadar se prošnja šteje za nedopustno v skladu s tem členom.
Member States may consider an application for asylum as inadmissible pursuant to this Article if:
Države članice lahko štejejo prošnjo za azil za nedopustno v skladu s tem členom, če:
another Member State has granted refugee status;
je status begunca priznala druga država članica;
a country which is not a Member State is considered as a first country of asylum for the applicant, pursuant to Article 26;
se država, ki ni država članica, šteje za prvo državo azila za prosilca na podlagi člena 26;
a country which is not a Member State is considered as a safe third country for the applicant, pursuant to Article 27;
se država, ki ni država članica, šteje za varno tretjo državo za prosilca na podlagi člena 27;
the applicant is allowed to remain in the Member State concerned on some other grounds and as result of this he/she has been granted a status equivalent to the rights and benefits of the refugee status by virtue of Directive 2004/83/EC;
se prosilcu dovoli, da ostane v zadevni državi članici iz drugih razlogov in se mu na tej podlagi prizna status, ki nudi enake pravice in ugodnosti kot status begunca na podlagi Direktive 2004/83/ES;
the applicant is allowed to remain in the territory of the Member State concerned on some other grounds which protect him/her against refoulement pending the outcome of a procedure for the determination of status pursuant to point (d);
se prosilcu dovoli, da ostane na ozemlju zadevne države članice iz drugih razlogov, ki ga ščitijo pred izročitvijo do zaključka postopka za priznanje statusa v skladu s točko (d);
the applicant has lodged an identical application after a final decision;
je prosilec po dokončni odločbi vložil enako prošnjo;
a dependant of the applicant lodges an application, after he/she has in accordance with Article 6(3) consented to have his/her case be part of an application made on his/her behalf, and there are no facts relating to the dependant’s situation, which justify a separate application.
nepreskrbljena oseba prosilca vloži prošnjo, potem ko je v skladu s členom 6(3) podala soglasje, da bo njen primer del prošnje, ki je bila vložena v njenem imenu, in ne obstajajo nikakršna dejstva v zvezi z nepreskrbljeno osebo, ki bi upravičevala ločeno prošnjo.
A country can be considered to be a first country of asylum for a particular applicant for asylum if:
Za posameznega prosilca za azil se šteje država za prvo državo azila, če:
he/she has been recognised in that country as a refugee and he/she can still avail himself/herself of that protection; or
je bil prosilcu v tej državi priznan status begunca in se lahko še vedno sklicuje na to zaščito; ali
he/she otherwise enjoys sufficient protection in that country, including benefiting from the principle of non-refoulement;
sicer v tej državi uživa zadostno zaščito, vključno z načelom nevračanja,
provided that he/she will be re-admitted to that country.
pod pogojem, da bo v to državo ponovno sprejet.
In applying the concept of first country of asylum to the particular circumstances of an applicant for asylum Member States may take into account Article 27(1).
Pri uporabi pojma prve države azila za okoliščine posameznega prosilca za azil lahko države članice upoštevajo člen 27(1).
The safe third country concept
Koncept varne tretje države
Member States may apply the safe third country concept only where the competent authorities are satisfied that a person seeking asylum will be treated in accordance with the following principles in the third country concerned:
Države članice lahko uporabijo koncept varne tretje države samo, če so pristojni organi prepričani, da se z osebo, ki išče azil, v zadevni tretji državi ravna v skladu z naslednjimi načeli:
life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion;
življenje in svoboda nista ogroženi zaradi rase, vere, državljanstva, pripadnosti določeni družbeni skupini ali političnega prepričanja;
the principle of non-refoulement in accordance with the Geneva Convention is respected;
v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo se spoštuje načelo nevračanja;
the prohibition of removal, in violation of the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as laid down in international law, is respected; and
spoštuje se prepoved odstranitve, ki bi kršila prepoved mučenja ter krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, kakor je določena v mednarodnem pravu; in
the possibility exists to request refugee status and, if found to be a refugee, to receive protection in accordance with the Geneva Convention.
možnost zaprositi za status begunca ter, če je ugotovljeno, da je oseba res begunec, pridobiti zaščito v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo.
The application of the safe third country concept shall be subject to rules laid down in national legislation, including:
Uporaba koncepta varne tretje države je možna na podlagi pravil nacionalne zakonodaje, vključno:
rules requiring a connection between the person seeking asylum and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for that person to go to that country;
pravil, ki zahtevajo zvezo med osebo, ki išče azil, in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katerih bi bilo smiselno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
rules on the methodology by which the competent authorities satisfy themselves that the safe third country concept may be applied to a particular country or to a particular applicant.
metodoloških pravil, ki pristojnim organom omogočajo, da ugotovijo, da lahko koncept varne tretje države uporabijo za posamezno državo ali v zvezi s posameznim prosilcem.
Such methodology shall include case-by-case consideration of the safety of the country for a particular applicant and/or national designation of countries considered to be generally safe;
Takšna metodologija vključuje preučitev varnosti države od primera do primera za določenega prosilca in/ali nacionalne označitve zadevnih držav, ki se na splošno štejejo za varne;
rules in accordance with international law, allowing an individual examination of whether the third country concerned is safe for a particular applicant which, as a minimum, shall permit the applicant to challenge the application of the safe third country concept on the grounds that he/she would be subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
pravil, ki v skladu z mednarodnim pravom omogočajo posamično preučitev, ali je zadevna tretja država za določenega prosilca varna, in ki morajo prosilcu omogočati vsaj izpodbijanje uporabe koncepta varne tretje države zaradi podvrženosti mučenju, krutemu, nečloveškemu ali ponižujočemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju.
When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, Member States shall:
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice:
inform the applicant accordingly; and
o tem obvestijo prosilca; in
provide him/her with a document informing the authorities of the third country, in the language of that country, that the application has not been examined in substance.
posredujejo prosilcu dokument, s katerim oblastem tretje države v jeziku te države sporočajo, da prošnja vsebinsko ni bila obravnavana.
Where the third country does not permit the applicant for asylum to enter its territory, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Kadar tretja država zadevnemu prosilcu za azil ne dovoli vstopa na njeno ozemlje, države članice zagotovijo dostopnost postopka v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II.
Member States shall inform the Commission periodically of the countries to which this concept is applied in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
Države članice redno obveščajo Komisijo o državah, za katere se v skladu z določbami tega člena uporablja ta koncept.
Unfounded applications
Neutemeljene prošnje
Without prejudice to Articles 19 and 20, Member States may only consider an application for asylum as unfounded if the determining authority has established that the applicant does not qualify for refugee status pursuant to Directive 2004/83/EC.
Brez poseganja v člena 19 in 20 lahko države članice štejejo prošnjo za azil za neutemeljeno le, če je organ za presojo ugotovil, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za status begunca v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES.
In the cases mentioned in Article 23(4)(b) and in cases of unfounded applications for asylum in which any of the circumstances listed in Article 23(4)(a) and (c) to (o) apply, Member States may also consider an application as manifestly unfounded, where it is defined as such in the national legislation.
V primerih iz člena 23(4)(b) in v primerih neutemeljenih prošenj za azil, za katere se uporablja katera koli od okoliščin, ki so naštete v členu 23(4)(a) in (c) do (o), lahko države članice prošnjo štejejo tudi za očitno neutemeljeno, če jo kot tako predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja.
Minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin
Minimalni skupni seznam tretjih držav, ki se štejejo za varne izvorne države
The Council shall, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, adopt a minimum common list of third countries which shall be regarded by Member States as safe countries of origin in accordance with Annex II.
Svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom s kvalificirano večino sprejme minimalni skupni seznam tretjih držav, ki jih države članice v skladu s Prilogo II štejejo za varne države.
The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Svet lahko na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom s kvalificirano večino spremeni minimalni skupni seznam tako, da v skladu s Prilogo II doda ali črta tretje države.
The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council or by a Member State to submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.
Komisija preuči vsako prošnjo Sveta ali države članice, da naj predloži predlog za spremembo minimalnega skupnega seznama.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Pri pripravi predloga po odstavkih 1 ali 2 Komisija uporabi podatke držav članic, lastne podatke in po potrebi podatke UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
Where the Council requests the Commission to submit a proposal for removing a third country from the minimum common list, the obligation of Member States pursuant to Article 31(2) shall be suspended with regard to this third country as of the day following the Council decision requesting such a submission.
Kadar Svet od Komisije zahteva pripravo predloga za črtanje tretje države z minimalnega skupnega seznama, obveznost držav članic v zvezi s to tretjo državo v skladu s členom 31(2) začasno preneha z dnem, ki sledi sklepu Sveta, s katerim zahteva predložitev predloga.
Where a Member State requests the Commission to submit a proposal to the Council for removing a third country from the minimum common list, that Member State shall notify the Council in writing of the request made to the Commission.
Kadar država članica od Komisije zahteva, naj Svetu predloži predlog za črtanje tretje države z minimalnega skupnega seznama, ta država članica pisno uradno obvesti Svet o zahtevi, ki jo je naslovila na Komisijo.
The obligation of this Member State pursuant to Article 31(2) shall be suspended with regard to the third country as of the day following the notification to the Council.
Obveznost te države članice v skladu s členom 31(2) v zvezi s tretjo državo začasno preneha z dnem, ki sledi uradnemu obvestilu Svetu.
The European Parliament shall be informed of the suspensions under paragraphs 4 and 5.
6. Evropski parlament je obveščen o začasnih prenehanjih obveznosti iz odstavkov 4 in 5.
The suspensions under paragraphs 4 and 5 shall end after three months, unless the Commission makes a proposal before the end of this period, to withdraw the third country from the minimum common list.
Začasna prenehanja obveznosti iz odstavkov 4 in 5 se končajo v treh mesecih, razen če Komisija pred iztekom tega obdobja predlaga črtanje tretje države z minimalnega skupnega seznama.
The suspensions shall in any case end where the Council rejects a proposal by the Commission to withdraw the third country from the list.
Začasna prenehanja obveznosti se v vsakem primeru končajo, ko Svet zavrne predlog Komisije za črtanje tretje države s seznama.
Upon request by the Council, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on whether the situation of a country on the minimum common list is still in conformity with Annex II.
Komisija na zahtevo Sveta poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, ali so razmere v državi, ki je na minimalnem skupnem seznamu, še vedno v skladu s Prilogo II.
When presenting its report, the Commission may make such recommendations or proposals as it deems appropriate.
Ob predložitvi svojega poročila lahko Komisija poda priporočila in predloge, za katere meni, da so ustrezni.
National designation of third countries as safe countries of origin
Nacionalna označitev tretjih držav za varne izvorne države
Without prejudice to Article 29, Member States may retain or introduce legislation that allows, in accordance with Annex II, for the national designation of third countries other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum.
Brez poseganja v člen 29 lahko države članice ohranijo ali sprejmejo zakonodajo, ki v skladu s Prilogo II dopušča nacionalno označitev dodatnih tretjih držav, ki jih ni na minimalnem skupnem seznamu, za varne izvorne države za namene obravnavanja prošenj za azil.
This may include designation of part of a country as safe where the conditions in Annex II are fulfilled in relation to that part.
To lahko vključuje označitev dela države za varnega, kadar so v tem delu izpolnjeni pogoji iz Priloge II.
By derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may retain legislation in force on 1 December 2005 that allows for the national designation of third countries, other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum where they are satisfied that persons in the third countries concerned are generally neither subject to:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 lahko države članice ohranijo zakonodajo, ki je bila v veljavi dne 1. decembra 2005 in ki dopušča nacionalno označitev dodatnih tretjih držav, ki jih ni na minimalnem skupnem seznamu, za varne izvorne države za namene obravnavanja prošenj za azil, če se prepričajo, da osebe v zadevnih tretjih državah na splošno niso podvržene:
persecution as defined in Article 9 of Directive 2004/83/EC; nor
preganjanju, kot je opredeljeno v členu 9 Direktive 2004/83/ES; niti
torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
mučenju ali nečloveškemu ali ponižujočemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju.
Member States may also retain legislation in force on 1 December 2005 that allows for the national designation of part of a country as safe, or a country or part of a country as safe for a specified group of persons in that country, where the conditions in paragraph 2 are fulfilled in relation to that part or group.
Države članice lahko prav tako ohranijo zakonodajo, ki je bila v veljavi dne 1. decembra 2005 in ki dopušča nacionalno označitev dela države za varnega ali državo ali del države za varna za določeno skupino ljudi v tej državi, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz odstavka 2 glede tega dela ali te skupine.
In assessing whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3, Member States shall have regard to the legal situation, the application of the law and the general political circumstances in the third country concerned.
Pri ocenjevanju, ali je država varna izvorna država v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, države članice upoštevajo pravni položaj, uporabo prava in splošne politične razmere v zadevni tretji državi.
The assessment of whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with this Article shall be based on a range of sources of information, including in particular information from other Member States, the UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Ocenjevanje, ali je država varna izvorna država v skladu s tem členom, temelji na različnih virih podatkov, vključujoč zlasti podatke iz drugih držav članic, UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
Member States shall notify to the Commission the countries that are designated as safe countries of origin in accordance with this Article.
Države članice obveščajo Komisijo o državah, ki so v skladu s tem členom označene za varne izvorne države.
The safe country of origin concept
Koncept varne izvorne države
A third country designated as a safe country of origin in accordance with either Article 29 or 30 may, after an individual examination of the application, be considered as a safe country of origin for a particular applicant for asylum only if:
Tretja država, ki je bila bodisi v skladu s členom 29 bodisi s členom 30 označena za varno izvorno državo, se lahko po individualnem obravnavanju prošnje šteje za določenega prosilca za azil za varno izvorno državo samo, če:
he/she has the nationality of that country; or
ima prosilec državljanstvo te države; ali
he/she is a stateless person and was formerly habitually resident in that country;
je prosilec oseba brez državljanstva in je imel prej stalno prebivališče v tej državi
and he/she has not submitted any serious grounds for considering the country not to be a safe country of origin in his/her particular circumstances and in terms of his/her qualification as a refugee in accordance with Directive 2004/83/EC.
ter če ni izkazal nikakršnih resnih razlogov, zaradi katerih bi se štelo, da ta država glede na njegove osebne okoliščine z ozirom na njegovo prošnjo za status begunca v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES ni varna izvorna država.