natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the progress report on implementation of the annual work programme and a declaration of expenditure accounting for at least 70 % of the amount of the initial payment provided for by Article 23(3) of Decision 2004/904/EC
poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju letnega programa dela in izjava o izdatkih, da je bilo porabljeno najmanj 70 % zneska začetnega izplačila, predvidenega v členu 23(3) Odločbe 2004/904/ES
has been supplied
je bilo predloženo
is enclosed
je priloženo
the annual programme’s final implementation report and the final declaration of expenditure provided for by Articles 24(4) and 28 (2) of Decision 2004/904/EC
končno poročilo o izvajanju letnega programa in končna izjava o izdatkih, določena v členih 24(4) in 28(2) Odločbe 2004/904/ES
the decisions of the responsible authority are consistent with the total amount of Fund contribution to the priorities concerned
odločitve odgovornega organa so v skladu s skupnim zneskom prispevka Sklada za zadevne prednostne naloge
any recommendations for improving the monitoring and management arrangements made by the Commission under Article 27 of Decision 2004/904/EC
kakršna koli priporočila za izboljšanje načinov spremljanja in upravljanja, ki jih je podala Komisija v skladu s členom 27 Odločbe 2004/904/ES
have been acted upon
je bila upoštevana
explanations have been given
je bila podana obrazložitev
no recommendations made
ni bilo priporočil
any request for corrective measures under Article 26 of Decision 2004/904/EC
katera koli zahteva za korektivne ukrepe, navedene v členu 26 Odločbe 2004/904/ES
have been commented on
so bile dane pripombe
no expenditure included
ni vsebovala izdatkov
no requests made
ni bilo zahtev
Payment should be made to:
Zneski se izplačajo:
Beneficiary
Upravičenec:
Bank
Banka:
Account no
Račun št.:
Account holder (if different from beneficiary)
Imetnik računa (če drug kot upravičenec):
Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of competent authority
Ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, žig, funkcija in podpis pristojnega organa)
MODEL FOR THE DECLARATION OF EXPENDITURE (Article 25)
VZOREC IZJAVE O IZDATKIH (člen 25)
To the European Commission, Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security
Evropski komisiji, Generalnemu direktoratu za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost
DECLARATION BY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY
IZJAVA ODGOVORNEGA ORGANA
I, … (state name in capitals, title and department) hereby submit the final declaration of expenditure for the European Refugee Fund annual programme for the year … and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
Spodaj podpisani … (navedite ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, naziv in oddelek/službo) prilagam končno izjavo o izdatkih za letni program Evropskega sklada za begunce za leto … in vlogo za Komisijo za izplačilo preostalega zneska sofinanciranja Skupnosti.
I can provide assurance on the national annual programme for the year … that:
Za nacionalni letni program za leto … zagotavljam, da:
for the purposes of certification, the Certifying Authority has received adequate information from the Responsible Authority on the management procedures operated, the projects co-financed by the fund and the controls carried out in relation to expenditure included in statements of expenditure;
je organ za potrjevanje za namene potrjevanja od odgovornega organa prejel ustrezne podatke o opravljenih postopkih upravljanja, o projektih, ki jih sofinancira Sklad, ter o preverjanjih, opravljenih v zvezi z izdatki, vključenimi v izjave o izdatkih;
Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority.
Ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, žig, funkcija in podpis odgovornega organa
EXPENDITURE BY ACTIVITY
IZDATKI PO DEJAVNOSTIH
Total eligible expenditure paid [1]
Izplačani skupni upravičeni izdatki [1]
Reception & asylum procedures
Sprejem in azilni postopki
Voluntary return
Prostovoljno Vračanje
Projects covering more than one activity
Projekti, ki zajemajo več kot eno dejavnost
ERF Total
Skupaj ERF
Amounts recovered since the last declaration of expenditure included in this declaration of expenditure (grouped by measure)
Vrnjeni zneski v obdobju od prejšnje izjave o izdatkih, vključenih v to izjavo o izdatkih (v skupinah po ukrepih)
Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of responsible authority
Ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, žig, funkcija in podpis odgovornega organa
CERTIFICATION
POTRDILO
I, … (state name in capitals, title and department), have examined the final statement of expenditure for the European Refugee Fund in … (indicate period covered) and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance.
Spodaj podpisani … (navedite ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, naziv in službo) sem proučil končno izjavo o izdatkih za Evropski sklad za begunce v … (navedite zajeto obdobje) in vlogo za Komisijo za izplačilo preostalega zneska.
SCOPE OF THE EXAMINATION
OBSEG PROUČITVE
The certification aimed to provide assurance that:
Cilj potrjevanja je zagotoviti, da:
OBSERVATIONS
OPOMBE
The scope of the examination has been limited by the following:
Obseg proučitve je bil omejen z naslednjim:
(Indicate any obstacles encountered in the examination, for example systemic problems, management weaknesses, lack of audit trail, lack of supporting documentation, cases under legal proceedings, etc; estimate the amounts of expenditure affected by these obstacles and the corresponding Community co-financing)
(Navedite vse nastale ovire pri preverjanju, na primer sistemske težave, pomanjkljivosti v upravljanju, pomanjkanje revizijske sledi, pomanjkanje dokaznih listin, zadeve v sodnih postopkih itd.; ocenite znesek izdatkov, na katerega vplivajo te ovire, in zadevni znesek sofinanciranja Skupnosti)
The examination, together with the conclusions of other national or Community controls to which I have had access, reveal a low/high (indicate as appropriate; if high please explain) frequency of errors/irregularities.
Proučitev, skupaj z zaključki ostalih nacionalnih pregledov ali pregledov Skupnosti, do katerih sem imel dostop, razkriva nizko/visoko (navedite ustrezno; če visoko, obrazložite) stopnjo pogostosti napak/nepravilnosti.
The errors/irregularities reported have been satisfactorily dealt with by the responsible authorities and they do not appear to affect the amount of Community co-financing payable, with the following exceptions:
Odgovorni organi so prijavljene napake/nepravilnosti zadovoljivo rešil in ne zdi se, da vplivajo na znesek, ki se izplača kot sofinanciranje Skupnosti, z naslednjimi izjemami:
(Indicate the errors/irregularities which have not been satisfactorily dealt with, and for each case, the possible systemic character and extent of the problem and the amounts of Community co-financing which appear to be affected)
(Navedite napake/nepravilnosti, ki niso bile zadovoljivo rešene, in za vsak primer posebej tudi možen sistemski značaj in razsežnost težave ter zneske sofinanciranja Skupnosti, na katere se zdi, da vpliva.)
If no obstacles were encountered in the examination, the frequency of errors found is low and all problems have been satisfactorily dealt with:
Če se pri proučitvi ne odkrije ovir, stopnja pogostosti napak je nizka in so bile vse težave zadovoljivo rešene:
In the light of the examination and the conclusion of other national or community checks to which I have access, it is my opinion that the final statement of expenditure presents fairly, in all material aspects, the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC, and the request to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.
Glede na proučitev in sklepne ugotovitve drugih pregledov s strani nacionalnih organov ali Skupnosti, do katerih imam dostop, menim, da končna izjava o izdatkih v vseh materialnih vidikih pravilno predstavlja izdatke, nastale v skladu z Odločbo 2004/904/ES, in da se zdi zahteva Komisiji za izplačilo preostalega zneska sofinanciranja Skupnosti veljavna.
If certain obstacles were encountered in the examination, but the frequency of errors is not high, or if some problems have not been satisfactorily dealt with:
Če se pri proučitvi odkrijejo nekatere ovire, vendar stopnja pogostosti napak ni visoka ali če nekateri problemi niso bili zadovoljivo rešeni:
Except for the matters referred to at point 3 and/or the errors/irregularities referred to at point 4 which do not appear to have been satisfactorily dealt with, it is my opinion, based on the examination and the conclusions of other national or Community checks to which I have had access, that the final statement presents fairly, in all material respects the expenditure incurred in accordance with Decision 2004/904/EC and its implementing rules, and that the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing appears to be valid.
Razen za zadeve iz točke 1 in/li napake/nepravilnosti iz točke 2, za katere se zdi, da niso bile zadovoljivo rešene, na podlagi proučitve in sklepnih ugotovitev drugih pregledov s strani nacionalnih organov ali Skupnosti, do katerih sem imel dostop, menim, da končna izjava v vseh materialnih vidikih pravilno predstavlja izdatke, nastale v skladu z Odločbo 2004/904/ES in njenimi izvedbenimi pravili, ter da se zdi vloga za Komisijo za izplačilo preostalega zneska sofinanciranja Skupnosti veljavna.
If major obstacles were encountered in the examination or the frequency of errors found is high even if the reported errors/irregularities have been satisfactorily dealt with:
Če se pri proučitvi odkrijejo večje ovire ali je stopnja pogostosti odkritih napak visoka, tudi če so bile prijavljene napake/nepravilnosti zadovoljivo rešene:
in view of the matters referred to at point 3 and/or given the high frequency of errors reported at point 4, I am not in a position to express an opinion on the final statement of expenditure and the application to the Commission for payment of the balance of the Community co-financing.
Glede na zadeve iz točke 1 in/ali glede na visoko stopnjo pogostosti prijavljenih napak iz točke 2, ne morem podati mnenja o končni izjavi o izdatkih in vlogi za Komisijo za izplačilo preostalega zneska sofinanciranja Skupnosti.
Name in capital letters, stamp, position and signature of certifying authority.
Ime in priimek z velikimi črkami, žig, funkcija in podpis organa za potrjevanje
Please refer to Article 16 of this Decision.
Glej člen 16 te odločbe.
E-mail: …
E-naslov: …
Max 7 % of MS annual allocation, plus EUR 30000. No obligation for co-financing.
Največ 7 % letnih dodeljenih sredstev držav članic, plus 30000 EUR. Sofinanciranje ni obvezno.
Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security
Generalni direktorat za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost
Unit B/4 European Refugee Fund
Enota B/4 Evropski sklad za begunce
Timetable (Starting dates for projects should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year.
Časovni razpored
Timetable (Starting dates for technical assistance measures should be in the period between 1st January and 31st December of the programme year.
Časovni razpored
The Member State shall lay down all the arrangements governing its relations with the said authorities. Without prejudice to the provisions of this Decision, the Member State lays down all the arrangements governing the relations between the said authorities, which shall act in full compliance with the institutional, legal and financial systems of the Member State concerned.
Država članica določi brez poseganja v določbe te odločbe vse podrobnosti, ki urejajo odnose med navedenimi organi, ki delujejo popolnoma v skladu z instituticionalnim, pravnim in finančnim sistemom zadevne države članice.
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline) Refer to the actions detailed under Article 5 of Decision 2004/904/EC
Sklic na dejavnosti, navedene v členu 5 Odločbe 2004/904/ES
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline) Refer to the actions detailed under Article 6 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
Sklic na dejavnosti, navedene v členu 6 Odločbe 2004/904/ES
v. Actions to be implemented (operational outline) Refer to the actions detailed under Article 7 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
Sklic na dejavnosti, navedene v členu 7 Odločbe 2004/904/ES
establishing the Community Eco-label working plan
o vzpostavitvi delovnega načrta za znak Skupnosti za okolje
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 on a revised Community Eco-label award scheme [1], and in particular Article 5 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1980/2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. julija 2000 o spremenjenem sistemu Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje [1] in zlasti člena 5 Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 provides that the Commission is to establish a Community Eco-label working plan.
Uredba (ES) št. 1980/2000 predvideva, da mora Komisija vzpostaviti delovni načrt za znak Skupnosti za okolje.
The working plan should include a strategy for the development of the scheme, setting out objectives for environmental improvement and market penetration, a non-exhaustive list of product groups which should be considered as priorities for Community action, and plans for co-ordination and co-operation between the Community scheme and other Eco-label award schemes in Member States.
Delovni načrt naj bi vseboval strategijo za razvoj sistema, določitev ciljev za izboljšanje stanja okolja in uveljavitev na trgu, okviren seznam skupin proizvodov, ki bodo imele prednost pri ukrepanju Skupnosti, ter načrte za usklajevanje in sodelovanje med sistemom Skupnosti in drugimi sistemi za podeljevanje znakov za okolje v državah članicah.
Furthermore the working plan should provide measures for the implementation of the strategy and include the planned financing of the scheme.
Nadalje je treba v delovnem načrtu predvideti ukrepe za izvajanje strategije in vključiti načrtovano financiranje sistema.
The revised working plan should be drafted on the basis of the experience gained during the implementation of the first Community Eco-label working plan [2].
Spremenjeni delovni načrt se pripravi na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih pri izvajanju prvega delovnega načrta za znak Skupnosti za okolje [2].
The working plan should be reviewed periodically.
Delovni načrt je treba redno pregledovati.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega po členu 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1980/2000 –
The revised Community Eco-label working plan for the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007, set out in the Annex, is adopted.
Sprejme se spremenjeni delovni načrt za znak Skupnosti za okolje, določen v Prilogi, za obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2007.
A review of the working plan shall be initiated before 31 December 2007.
Pregled delovnega načrta se začne pred 31. decembrom 2007.
Done at Brussels, 9 February 2006.
V Bruslju, 9. februarja 2006.
OJ L 7, 11.1.2002, p. 28.
UL L 7, 11.1.2002, str. 28.
COMMUNITY ECO-LABEL WORKING PLAN
DELOVNI NAČRT ZA ZNAK SKUPNOSTI ZA OKOLJE
The Community Eco-label was introduced in 1992 to encourage businesses to develop goods and services with a reduced environmental impact throughout their whole life-cycle and to provide consumers with better information about these impacts.
Znak Skupnosti za okolje je bil uveden leta 1992, da bi spodbudil podjetja k razvijanju blaga in storitev, ki imajo v celotnem življenjskem ciklusu manjši vpliv na okolje, ter zagotovil boljše obveščanje potrošnikov o teh vplivih.
The Community Eco-label scheme is part of a broader strategy aimed at promoting sustainable production and consumption.
Sistem Skupnosti za podeljevanje znaka za okolje je del širše strategije, katere cilj je pospeševanje trajnostne proizvodnje in potrošnje.
This aim can be achieved in the context of a ‘framework for an integrated life-cycle oriented product policy’, as indicated in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme (6EAP).
Kot je navedeno v šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu (6EAP), je ta cilj lahko dosežen v okviru „okvira za integrirano, v življenjski krog usmerjeno politiko do proizvodov“.
The key objectives are to ensure a high level of protection and to break the link between environmental pressures and economic growth, thus working in the framework of the European Union’s Lisbon Strategy of Economic and Social Renewal (2000) [1] and Sustainable Development Strategy (Gothenburg, 2001) [2].
Ključni cilji so zagotoviti visoko raven varstva in prekiniti povezavo med pritiski na okolje in gospodarsko rastjo ter tako delovati v okviru lizbonske strategije o gospodarski in socialni obnovitvi (2000) [1] in strategije za trajnostni razvoj (Göteborg, leta 2001) [2] Evropske unije.
More specifically, the Communication on Integrated Product Policy [3] (IPP) proposes a new strategy to strengthen and refocus product-related environmental policies and develop the market for greener products.
Natančneje, sporočilo o integrirani politiki do proizvodov [3] (IPP) predlaga novo strategijo za utrditev in preusmerjanje okoljskih politik v zvezi s proizvodi in za razvijanje trga za okolju prijaznejše proizvode.
The Community Eco-label is one of the tools that can help to reach this aim.
Znak Skupnosti za okolje je eno izmed orodij, ki lahko pomagajo doseči ta cilj.
Within the Eco-label Scheme there is considerable information and expertise on product policy based on life-cycle thinking which should be made available to stakeholders involved in further developing the Integrated Product Policy approach.
V sistemu znaka Skupnosti za okolje je veliko informacij in strokovnega znanja o politiki do proizvodov, ki temelji na upoštevanju življenjskega kroga, ki ga je treba približati interesnim skupinam, sodelujočim v nadaljnjem razvijanju pristopa integrirane politike do proizvodov.
In the framework of the shift towards sustainable consumption and production, the new public procurement Directives [4] integrating environmental considerations into public procurement and the recently published Handbook on Environmental Public Procurement open new opportunities for the Community Eco-label.
V okviru premika k trajnostni porabi in proizvodnji novih direktiv [4] o javnih naročilih, ki vključujejo okoljske vidike v javna naročila, in pred kratkim izdan Priročnik o okoljskih javnih naročilih prinašajo nove možnosti za znak Skupnosti za okolje.
While public purchasers may not explicitly demand products and services bearing the Community Eco-label in their tenders, the new directives offer possibilities to use criteria set out by the Scheme or equivalent when defining performance-based or functional environmental requirements.
Medtem ko javni kupci lahko v svojih razpisih ne zahtevajo izrecno, da so proizvodi in storitve v ponudbah opremljeni z znakom Skupnosti za okolje, pa nove direktive, kadar opredeljujejo zahteve na podlagi kakovosti ali okoljske funkcionalnosti, omogočajo uporabo meril, določenih s sistemom ali ekvivalentom.
This should encourage public authorities to take the political decision to green their purchasing via the Community Eco-label and its criteria or other equivalent schemes, which provide a strong product information basis.The Community Eco-label also interrelates with a wide variety of instruments aiming at cleaner production, development and use of environmental technologies.
To bi moralo spodbuditi javne organe, da sprejemajo politične odločitve, zaradi katerih bo njihova nabava prek sistema za znak Skupnosti za okolje in njegovih meril ali drugih ekvivalentnih sistemov, ki zagotavljajo trdno podlago za podatke o proizvodih, zelena.Znak Skupnosti za okolje je tudi medsebojno povezan s številnimi instrumenti, katerih cilji so čistejša proizvodnja, razvoj in uporaba okoljskih tehnologij.
Its structures, procedures and knowledge are recognised as a strong starting point for designing the implementing measures for the proposed directive on the Eco-design of Energy-using Products.
Njegove strukture, postopki in znanje so poznani kot močno izhodišče za načrtovanje, kako izvajati ukrepe predlagane direktive o okoljskem oblikovanju proizvodov, ki za svoje delovanje potrebujejo energijo.
A priority field of activities under the Environmental Technologies Action Plan (ETAP), namely design and implementation of performance targets, includes exploring the relationship between the concept of performance targets and the environmental performance of goods and services addressed by EU initiatives like the Community Eco-label.
Prednostno področje dejavnosti v okviru akcijskega načrta okoljskih tehnologij (ETAP), in sicer načrtovanje in izvajanje ciljnih zmogljivosti, vključuje raziskovanje odnosa med zasnovo ciljnih zmogljivosti in okoljsko uspešnostjo blaga in storitev, ki jih obravnavajo pobude EU, kot je znak Skupnosti za okolje.
Enlargement, with 10 New Member States in May 2004, has created new conditions for the development of the Community Eco-label and for contributing to the field of environmental communication and awareness-raising.
Širitev maja 2004, z desetimi novimi državami članicami, je ustvarila nove razmere za razvoj znaka Skupnosti za okolje ter za prispevanje k okoljski komunikaciji in ozaveščanju.
A clear, pan-European Eco-label like the Flower, could make it much easier for consumers to buy green across Europe, while it also helps their understanding of Type I labelling.
Jasen, vseevropski znak Skupnosti za okolje, npr. Flower (cvet), bi potrošnikom olajšal zeleno nakupovanje po Evropi in jim hkrati pomagal razumeti označevanje tipa I.
Well designed, market-based environmental labelling schemes will remain attractive to consumers because of their immediacy and simplicity and because they ensure better and more accessible information on the environment for citizens.
Dobro zasnovani sistemi okoljskega označevanja na tržni podlagi bodo ostali za potrošnike privlačni zaradi svoje neposrednosti in preprostosti in ker državljanom zagotavljajo boljše in dostopnejše informacije o okolju.
They are also business-friendly because they act as product enhancers that offer marketing advantages at the point of sale, if they are developed in partnership with manufacturers and come at a reasonable cost for enterprises.
Če so razviti v partnerstvu s proizvajalci in v okviru razumnih stroškov za podjetja, so prijazni tudi do podjetništva, saj povečujejo prodajno privlačnost proizvodov na prodajnem mestu.
It is clear that the Community Eco-label has not yet achieved satisfactory market penetration.
Jasno je, da znak Skupnosti za okolje še ni zadovoljivo prodrl na trg.
It is now in a better situation than before, with a continuously widening range of product groups (including both goods and services) and with new applications coming in steadily, nevertheless it is clear that the scheme has to be revised if it is to properly achieve its original aims and in particular its active take-up by the business community.
S čedalje širšo vrsto skupin proizvodov (vključno blago in storitve), in s stalno na novo prihajajočimi zahtevki je sedaj v boljšem položaju, kot je bil, a jasno je, da bo sistem za dosego prvotnih ciljev treba spremeniti, predvsem za njegov dejaven začetek v poslovnem svetu.
In view of the revision of the Community Eco-label Scheme an evaluation study is being carried out assessing its overall effectiveness in reducing negative environmental impacts.
Zaradi revizije sistema znaka Skupnosti za okolje se izvaja ocenjevalna študija, s katero se ocenjuje njegovo celotno učinkovitost pri zmanjševanju negativnih vplivov na okolje.
The Scheme’s contribution to sustainable consumption and production will be assessed, and proposals will be made on how, through its revision, it should best meet the challenge of promoting sustainable development in Europe, as well as making it more attractive to economic operators and in particular to SMEs.
Ocenjen bo prispevek sistema k trajnostni porabi in proizvodnji ter pripravljeni predlogi, kako z revizijo sistema najbolje odgovoriti na izzive pospeševanja trajnostnega razvoja v Evropi in kako ga narediti privlačnejšega za gospodarske subjekte, predvsem za mala in srednja podjetja.