natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These deficiencies have been identified by Germany, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [5].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, opravljenim po programu SAFA [5], ugotovila Nemčija.
In reply to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Germany, Air West Co. Ltd indicated that an action plan had been established in order to correct the safety deficiencies identified during ramp inspections.
Airwest Co. Ltd se ni odzval na preiskavo Uprave za civilno letalstvo Nemčije in je navedel, da je bil vzpostavljen akcijski načrt z namenom, da popravi varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med preverjanji na ploščadi.
However, there is still no evidence of the implementation of an appropriate action plan for the specific operations for which safety deficiencies have been identified.
Vendar ni dokazov o izvajanju ustreznega akcijskega načrta za določene dejavnosti, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
The authorities of Sudan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air West Co. Ltd have not provided sufficient information about the safety of these specific operations by Air West Co, when concerns were raised by Germany and the Commission.
Organi Sudana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor Air West Co. Ltd, niso priskrbeli zadostnih informacij o varnosti določenih dejavnosti Air West, ko sta Nemčija in Komisija izrazili pomisleke.
A recent inspection conducted by Germany with respect to aircraft IL-76, registration mark ST-EWX yielded no serious finding [6].
Nedavno preverjanje, ki ga je izvedla Nemčija glede zrakoplova IL-76 z registrsko oznako ST-EWX, ni prineslo resne ugotovitve [6].
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air West Co. Ltd does not meet the relevant safety standards, except for flights operated with the aircraft IL-76, registration number ST-EWX and should, therefore, be included in Annex B with respect to any other operations.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Airwest Co. Ltd ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov, razen glede letov, ki jih se opravljajo z zrakoplovom IL-76 z registrsko oznako ST-EWX, in ga je zato treba vključiti v Prilogo A glede vseh drugih dejavnosti.
There is verified evidence of non-compliance with specific safety standards established by the Chicago Convention.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o tem, da Blue Wing Airlines ne deluje v skladu z ustreznimi varnostnimi standardi iz Čikaške konvencije.
These deficiencies were identified by France, during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [7].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanjem na ploščadi, opravljenim po programu SAFA [7], ugotovila Francija.
Blue Wing Airlines did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of France and the Commission regarding the safety aspect of its operation.
Blue Wing Airlines se ni ustrezno odzval na preiskavo Uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije in Komisije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Blue Wing Airlines does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Blue Wing Airlines ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
While Sky Gate International Aviation’s Air Operator’s Certificate was issued by the Kyrgyz Republic, there is evidence showing that the airline does not have its principal place of business in Kyrgyzstan as indicated by the Kyrgyz civil aviation authority, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Čeprav je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Sky Gate International Aviation izdala Kirgiška republika, je dokazano, da prevoznik glavnega sedeža poslovanja nima v Kirgizistanu, kot je navedla Uprava za civilno letalstvo Kirgizije, kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
Sky Gate International Aviation did not respond adequately to enquiries by the civil aviation authority of United Kingdom and by the Commission regarding its principal place of business.
Sky Gate International Aviation se ni ustrezno odzval na preiskavo Uprave za civilno letalstvo Združenega kraljestva in Komisije glede svojega glavnega sedeža poslovanja.
The authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sky Gate International Aviation have not provided evidence of their ability to conduct the safety oversight operations of this carrier.
Organi Kirgiške republike, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Sky Gate International Aviation, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvajanje varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Sky Gate International Aviation does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Sky Gate International Aviation ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
While Star Jet’s Air Operator’s Certificate was issued by the Kyrgyz Republic, there is evidence showing that the airline does not have its principal place of business in Kyrgyzstan, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Čeprav je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika Star Jet izdala Kirgiška republika, se je izkazalo, da prevoznik nima glavnega sedeža v Kirgizistanu, kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
Star-Jet operates three Lockheed L-1011 Tristar aircraft whose serial numbers match the serial numbers for the three aircraft operated by Star Air certified by the authorities of Sierra Leone with responsibility for regulatory oversight and subject to an operating ban within the Community.
Star-Jet upravlja zrakoplov 3 Lockheed L-1011 Tristar, čigar serijska številka se ujema s serijskimi številkami treh zrakoplovov, ki jih upravlja Star Air, certificiran pri organih Sierre Leone, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor in za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti.
Star Jet did not respond adequately to enquiries by the civil aviation authority of the United Kingdom and to the Commission regarding its principal place of business.
Star Jet se ni ustrezno odzval na preiskavo Uprave za civilno letalstvo Združenega kraljestva in Evropske komisije glede svojega glavnega sedeža.
The authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Star Jet have not provided evidence of their ability to conduct the safety oversight operations of this carrier.
Organi Kirgiške republike, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor Star Jetom, niso priskrbeli dokazov o svoji sposobnosti za izvajanje varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Star Jet does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Star Jet ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
The authorities of Kazakhstan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of GST Aero Air Company have provided Italy with a list of three aircraft with valid certificates of airworthiness and equipped with the necessary safety equipment.
Organi Kazahstana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor GST Aero Air Company, so Italiji priskrbeli seznam treh zrakoplovov, ki imajo veljavna spričevala o plovnosti skupaj s potrebno varnostno opremo.
In addition they have informed Italy that a corrective action plan has been established in order to correct the safety deficiencies identified during ramp inspections performed by Italy on GST Aero Company [8].
Poleg tega so obvestili Italijo, da je vzpostavljen korekcijski akcijski načrt z namenom, da popravi varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovila Italija med preverjanji na ploščadi GST Aero Company [8].
However there is still no evidence of the implementation of an appropriate action plan for the deficiencies which have been identified in the operational procedures of GST Aero Air Company.
Vendar ni dokazov o izvajanju ustreznega akcijskega načrta glede pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile ugotovljene v operativnih postopkih GST Aero Air Company.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that GST Aero Air Company does not meet the relevant safety standards and it should consequently remain included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da GST Aero Air Company ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov in zato ostane v Prilogi A.
Air carriers from Mauritania
Letalski prevozniki iz Mavretanije
As envisaged in recital 99 of Regulation (EC) No 474/2006, an evaluation of the authorities of Mauritania with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Mauritanie and the undertakings under its responsibility should have been conducted before 23 May 2006.
Kot je predvideno v uvodni izjavi 99 Uredbe (ES) št. 474/2006, bi bilo treba opraviti oceno organov Mavretanije, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor Air Mauritanie, in podjetij pod njegovo odgovornostjo pred 23. majem 2006.
A team of European experts flew to Mauritania on 22 May 2006 for an evaluation visit.
Skupina evropskih strokovnjakov je odpotovala v Mavretanijo 22. maja 2006, da opravi oceno.
Its report shows that the common criteria for consideration of an operating ban of the Annex to the basic Regulation are not met.
Poročilo kaže, da niso izpolnjena skupna merila iz Priloge k osnovni uredbi.
As a consequence, Air Mauritanie should not be put on the list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community.
Zato se Air Mauritanie ne vključi na seznam letalskih prevoznikov, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v skupnosti za vse dejavnosti.
The civil aviation sector in Mauritania has been going through a considerable change, in particular with the adoption of a full set of new civil aviation legislation.
Sektor civilnega letalstva v Mavretaniji se znatno spreminja, zlasti s sprejetjem novega niza zakonodaje civilnega letalstva.
A further assessment of the progress in the implementation of the new legislation, requirements and procedures should be carried out in the first half of 2007.
Nadaljnja ocena o napredku izvajanja nove zakonodaje, zahtev in postopkov se mora opraviti v prvi polovici leta 2007.
General considerations concerning the other carriers included in the list
Splošne ugotovitve glede drugih prevoznikov, vključenih na seznam
No evidence of the full implementation of appropriate remedial actions by the other carriers included in the list established on 24 March 2006 and by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of these air carriers has been communicated to the Commission so far in spite of specific requests submitted by the latter.
Ne glede na njeno zahtevo Komisiji do sedaj niso bili sporočeni dokazi, iz katerih bi bilo razvidno, da so drugi letalski prevozniki, vključeni na seznam, ki je bil vzpostavljen 24. marca 2006, in tudi ne organi, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor teh prevoznikov, izvajali ustrezne sanacijske ukrepe.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that these air carriers should continue to be subject to an operating ban.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za te letalske prevoznike, še naprej veljati prepoved opravljanja letov.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu –
Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 474/2006 se spremeni:
Annex A is replaced by the Annex A to this Regulation.
Priloga A se nadomesti s Prilogo A k tej uredbi.
Annex B is replaced by the Annex B to this Regulation.
Priloga B se nadomesti s Prilogo B k tej uredbi.
Done at Brussels, 20 June 2006
V Bruslju, 20. junija 2006
Established by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonisation of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4).
Ustanovljen s členom 12 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 z dne 16. decembra 1991 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva (UL L 373, 31.12.1991, str. 4).
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE COMMUNITY [1]
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, ZA KATERE VELJA PREPOVED OPRAVLJANJA LETOV V SKUPNOSTI ZA VSE DEJAVNOSTI [1]
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if different)
Naziv pravne osebe letalskega prevoznika, kot je naveden na spričevalu letalskega prevoznika (in njegovo tržno ime, če se razlikuje)
Air Operator Certificate (AOC) No or Operating Licence No
Številka spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC) ali številka operativne licence
ICAO airline designation No
Oznaka ICAO
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)
Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja (DPRK)
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC), including,
Vsi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Demokratične republike Kongo, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor (DRK), vključno z
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial Guinea, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno z
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Liberije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor Liberije, vključno z
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone, including,
Vsi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Sierre Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno z
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Swaziland, including,
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Svazija, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno z
Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Vsem letalskim prevoznikom iz Priloge A lahko uresničujejo prometne pravice tako, da uporabljajo čarterske zrakoplove letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, če so izpolnjeni ustrezni varnostni standardi.
The operating ban on Ariana Afghan Airlines applies to all aircraft operated by this air carrier except the following one: A310 registration number F-GYYY.
Prepoved opravljanja letov za Ariana Afghan Airlines velja za vse zrakoplove, ki jih upravlja ta letalski prevoznik, razen za zrakoplov: A310 z registrsko številko F-GYYY.
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY [1]
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, KATERIH DEJAVNOSTI SO PREDMET OMEJITVE OPRAVLJANJE DEJAVNOSTI V SKUPNOSTI [1]
Air Operator Certificate (AOC) No
Številka spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC)
State of the operator
Država operaterja
Registration mark(s) and, when available, construction serial No(s)
Registrska(-e) številka(-e) in serijska(-e) številka(-e), če je na voljo
All fleet with the exception of: IL-76
Vsa flota razen: IL-76
All fleet with the exception of: ST-EWX (construction No 1013409282)
Vsa flota razen: ST-EWX (serijska številka: 1013409282)
All fleet with the exception of: L-101
Vsa flota razen: L-101
All fleet with the exception of: 9Q-CHC (construction No 193H-1209)
Vsa flota razen: 9Q-CHC (serijska št. 193H-1209
Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Letalskim prevoznikom iz Priloge B lahko uresničujejo prometne pravice tako, da uporabljajo čarterske zrakoplove letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, če so izpolnjeni ustrezni varnostni standardi.
Hewa Bora Airways is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.
Hewa Bora Airways lahko pri svojih sedanjih dejavnostih v Evropski skupnosti uporablja samo navedeni zrakoplov.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 911/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 911/2006
The applications for import licences submitted between 1 to 10 June 2006, expressed in terms of boned meat, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, do not exceed, in respect of products originating from Botswana, Kenya, Madagascar, Swaziland, Zimbabwe and Namibia, the quantities available from those States.
Število zahtevkov, vloženih od 1. do 10. junija 2006, za odkoščeno meso, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2247/2003, ne presega, za proizvode s poreklom iz Bocvane, Kenije, Madagaskarja, Svazija, Zimbabveja in Namibije, razpoložljivih količin za te države.
The quantities in respect of which licences may be applied for from 1 July 2006 should be fixed within the scope of the total quantity of 52100 t.
Treba je določiti količine, za katere je mogoče zaprositi uvozna dovoljenja od 1. julija 2006, v okviru skupne količine 52100 t.
The following Member States shall issue on 21 June 2006 import licences for beef and veal products, expressed as boned meat, originating in certain African, Caribbean and Pacific States, in respect of the following quantities and countries of origin:
Naslednje države članice izdajo 21. junija 2006 uvozna dovoljenja za proizvode iz govejega in telečjega mesa, izražene v odkoščenem mesu, s poreklom iz nekaterih afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav, za naslednje količine in države porekla:
120 t originating in Botswana,
120 t s poreklom iz Bocvane,
450 t originating in Namibia;
450 t s poreklom iz Namibije.
422 t originating in Namibia.
422 t s poreklom iz Namibije,
Licence applications may be submitted, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2247/2003, during the first 10 days of July 2006 for the following quantities of boned beef and veal:
Zahtevki za dovoljenja se lahko vložijo v skladu s členom 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2247/2003 tekom prvih deset dni meseca julija 2006 za naslednje količine odkoščenega govejega in telečjega mesa:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 912/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 912/2006
In the week of 12 to 16 June 2006 applications were presented to the competent authorities in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 for import licences for a total quantity exceeding a country's delivery obligation quantity of ACP-India preferential sugar determined pursuant to Article 9 of that Regulation.
Zahtevki so bili predloženi zadevnim organom v tednu od 12. do 16. junija 2006, v skladu s členom 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za celotno količino, ki presega obvezno količino za dostavo za zadevno državo, določeno v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003 za preferenčni sladkor AKP–Indija.
In the case of import licence applications presented from 12 to 16 June 2006 in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 licences shall be issued for the quantities indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženih od 12. do 16. junija 2006 v okviru člena 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, se dovoljenja izdajo v mejah količin, določenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 22 June 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 22. junija 2006.
Week of 12.-16.6.2006: percentage of requested quantity to be granted
% za dostavo zahtevanih količin v tednu od 12.–16.6.2006
Council Regulation (EC) No 913/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 913/2006
amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan
o spremembi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sistemov televizijskih kamer s poreklom iz Japonske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], (the basic Regulation),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“),
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems (TCS) originating in Japan.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1015/94 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev za uvoz sistemov televizijskih kamer (TCS) s poreklom iz Japonske.
In September 2000, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 [3], confirmed the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 (as subsequently amended) pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Septembra 2000 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000 [3] potrdil dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki so bile uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1015/94 (kot je bila naknadno spremenjena) v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
In Article 1(3)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000, the Council specifically excluded from the scope of the anti-dumping duty camera systems listed in the Annex to that Regulation (the Annex), representing high-end professional camera systems technically falling within the product definition under Article 1(2) of that Regulation, but which cannot be regarded as television camera systems.
V členu 1(3)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2000 je Svet iz uporabe protidampinške dajatve izrecno izključil sisteme kamer, navedenih v prilogi k navedeni uredbi („priloga“), ki so visokokakovostni sistemi profesionalnih kamer in s tehničnega vidika sodijo v opredelitev izdelka iz člena 1(2) navedene uredbe, vendar se ne morejo šteti za sisteme televizijskih kamer.
The Commission, by notice of 29 September 2005 [4], initiated a review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation concerning the anti-dumping measures in force on imports of TCS originating in Japan.
Komisija je 29. septembra 2005 [4] uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z veljavnimi protidampinškimi ukrepi za uvoz TCS s poreklom iz Japonske.
Two Japanese exporting producers, Matsushita and Hitachi Denshi (Europa) GmbH (Hitachi) informed the Commission that they intended to introduce new models of professional camera systems into the Community market and requested the Commission to add these new models of professional camera systems and their accessories to the Annex of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 and thus exempt them from the scope of the anti-dumping duties.
Dva japonska proizvajalca izvoznika, Matsushita in Hitachi Denshi (Evropa) GmbH („Hitachi“) sta obvestila Komisijo, da nameravata na trg Skupnosti uvesti nove modele sistemov profesionalnih televizijskih kamer, in od Komisije zahtevala, naj te nove modele sistemov profesionalni televizijskih kamer in njihovo opremo doda na seznam priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 in jih tako izvzame iz področja uporabe protidampinških dajatev.
The Commission informed the Community industry accordingly and commenced an investigation limited to the determination of whether the products under consideration fall within the scope of the anti-dumping duties and whether the operative part of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 should be amended accordingly.
Komisija je o tem obvestila industrijo Skupnosti in začela preiskavo, omejeno na opredelitev, ali obravnavani izdelki sodijo v področje uporabe protidampinških dajatev in ali je treba izvedbeni del Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2000 ustrezno spremeniti.
MODELS UNDER INVESTIGATION
MODELI V PREISKAVI
The requests for exemption were received for the following models of camera systems, supplied with the relevant technical information:
Skupaj z ustreznimi tehničnimi podatki so bili predloženi zahtevki za izvzetje naslednjih modelov sistemov kamer:
Camera head AK-HC910L,
glava kamere AK-HC910L,
Camera head AK-HC1500G,
glava kamere AK-HC1500G,
Camera control unit AK-HRP900,
krmilna enota kamere AK-HRP900,
Camera control unit AK-HRP150.
krmilna enota kamere AK-HRP150.