natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The cooperating Thai exporting producers also contended that the injury might have been caused by unstable market conditions.
Sodelujoči tajski proizvajalci izvozniki so tudi trdili, da so škodo lahko povzročile tudi nestabilne razmere na trgu.
In this context, they referred to the temporary steel price increases and the bargaining power of large customers.
V tem okviru so se sklicevali na začasno zvišanje cen jekla in pogajalsko moč večjih kupcev.
It is noted, however, that the temporary steel price increases have not inflicted any injury on the sampled Community producers.
Obenem pa je treba opomniti, da začasno zvišanje cen jekla ni povzročilo nobene škode vzorčenim proizvajalcem Skupnosti.
To the contrary, it was beneficial to them, since profitability temporarily increased.
Nasprotno, zanje je bilo celo ugodno, saj se je dobičkonosnost začasno povečala.
With regard to the impact of large customers, it is noted that unfair competition in the form of dumped imports essentially contributes to their bargaining power.
Glede vpliva večjih kupcev je treba opomniti, da nepoštena konkurenca v obliki dampinškega uvoza bistveno vpliva na njihovo pogajalsko moč.
Thus, a direct linkage between imports from the countries concerned and the behaviour of importers/distributors can be observed.
Zato se lahko opazi neposredna povezava med uvozom iz zadevnih držav in obnašanjem uvoznikov/distributerjev.
Overall, therefore, the conditions on the Community market have not broken the causal link between dumped imports and the injury sustained by the Community industry.
V celoti gledano razmere na trgu Skupnosti torej niso pretrgale vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom in škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Conclusion on causation
Sklep o vzročni zvezi
In summary, an appreciation of the above comments on causation and for the reasons set out in recitals 151 to 162 of the provisional Regulation, it is confirmed that no other factor has broken the causal link between the imports from the five countries concerned taken together and the material injury sustained by the Community industry.
Če povzamemo, ob upoštevanju zgornjih pripomb o vzročnosti in razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (151) do (162) začasne uredbe se potrdi, da vzročne zveze med uvozom iz zadevnih petih držav skupaj in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, ni prekinil noben drug dejavnik.
A number of importers/distributors and Thai exporting producers alleged that measures may not be in the interests of the Community.
Več uvoznikov/distributerjev in tajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdilo, da ukrepi niso nujno v interesu Skupnosti.
Impact of the measures on importers and users
Vpliv ukrepov na uvoznike in uporabnike
The importers/distributors, pointed out that measures would have a direct impact on their profit margins as they would not be able to pass on the costs of measures to their customers through higher prices.
Uvozniki/distributerji so poudarili, da bi ukrepi neposredno vplivali na njihove stopnje dobička, saj stroškov izvedbe ukrepov ne bi mogli prenesti na svoje kupce z dvigom cen.
First of all, these parties did not substantiate their allegations.
Prvič, te stranke niso utemeljile svojih domnev.
Moreover, as already stated in the provisional Regulation, no indication exists that anti-dumping measures would put the economic viability of importers/distributors at risk.
Nadalje, kakor je že omenjeno v začasni uredbi, ne obstaja nobena navedba o tem, da bi protidampinški ukrepi ogrozili ekonomsko upravičenost uvoznikov/distributerjev.
Moreover, their profit margins were, over the period considered, well above the profitability of the Community industry.
Poleg tega so njihove stopnje dobička v obravnavanem obdobju znatno presegale dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti.
It is therefore confirmed that any advantage importers/distributors may gain from the non-imposition of anti-dumping measures is outweighed by the interest of the Community industry in having the unfair and injurious trading practices from the countries concerned redressed.
Zato se potrdi, da interes industrije Skupnosti, da odpravi nepoštene in škodljive prakse zadevnih držav presega vsako prednost, ki so jo uvozniki/distributerji lahko imeli zaradi neuvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
The findings set out in recitals 164 to 170 of the provisional Regulation should be therefore confirmed.
Zato je treba ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (164) do (170) začasne uredbe potrditi.
The Thai exporting producers commented that the imposition of measures would increase costs for the European car industry and this would not be in the Community’s interest.
Tajski proizvajalci izvozniki so pripomnili, da bi uvedba ukrepov povečala stroške v evropski avtomobilski industriji, kar ne bi bilo v interesu Skupnosti.
However, they did not substantiate this alleged impact on users.
Vendar pa niso utemeljili tega domnevnega vpliva na uporabnike.
On the basis of information available, i.e. the reply of one user, a rolling stock vehicles producer, the impact of measures on downstream users would be negligible.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij, tj. odgovora uporabnika, proizvajalca tirnih vozil, bi bil vpliv ukrepov na uporabnike na nižjih stopnjah zanemarljiv.
The findings set out in recitals 173 and 174 of the provisional Regulation concerning interests of users and consumers should therefore be confirmed.
Zato je treba ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (173) in (174) začasne uredbe v zvezi z interesom uporabnikov in potrošnikov potrditi.
Having examined the various interests involved, it is confirmed for the reasons given in recitals 163 to 175 of the provisional Regulation that from an overall Community interest perspective no interest overweighs the Community industry’s interest to have anti-dumping measures imposed with the aim of eliminating the trade distorting effects resulting from dumped imports.
Po proučitvi različnih vpletenih interesov se zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav (163) do (175) začasne uredbe potrdi, da z vidika splošnega interesa Skupnosti noben interes ne presega interesa industrije Skupnosti za uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov z namenom odpraviti učinke, ki izkrivljajo trgovino, povzročene z dampinškim uvozom.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest, it is considered appropriate to impose definitive anti-dumping measures in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročnostjo in interesom Skupnosti se šteje za primerno, da se uvedejo dokončni protidampinški ukrepi, ki bodo preprečili nadaljnjo škodo, povzročeno industriji Skupnosti zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
For the purpose of determining the level of these measures, account was taken of the dumping margins found during the IP and of the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury sustained by the Community industry.
Za namen določitve stopnje teh ukrepov so se upoštevale stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene med OP, in znesek dajatve, potrebne za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
The necessary price increase to eliminate injury was determined on a per-company basis, by comparing the weighted average import price of the product concerned with the non-injurious price of the like product sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Potrebno povečanje cen za odpravo škode je bilo določeno za vsako družbo posebej na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka in neškodljivo ceno podobnega izdelka, ki ga je industrija Skupnosti prodajala na trgu Skupnosti.
The price difference was expressed as a percentage of the CIF import value.
Razlika v ceni je bila izražena kot odstotek uvozne vrednosti CIF.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by taking the weighted cost of production of the Community industry together with a profit margin of 5 %.
Za izračun neškodljive cene se je upoštevala tehtana cena proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti skupaj s stopnjo dobička 5 %.
In the absence of comments, this profit margin is confirmed to be that that the Community industry could achieve in the absence of dumped imports.
Ker ni bila predložena nobena pripomba, se ta stopnja dobička potrdi kot stopnja, ki jo industrija Skupnosti lahko doseže, kadar dampinški uvoz ne obstaja.
It reflects the achievable profit margin for similar product groups of the Community industry not subject to unfair competition, e.g. fasteners which do not fall under the CN codes of the product scope of the present investigation.
Odraža dosegljivo stopnjo dobička za podobne skupine izdelkov industrije Skupnosti, ki niso podvržene nepošteni konkurenci, npr. za pritrdilne elemente, ki se ne uvrščajo pod oznake KN izdelkov, zajetih v to preiskavo.
Form and level of the duty
Oblika in stopnja dajatve
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of SSF from the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno velja, da se mora v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe uvesti dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz PENJ iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indonezije, Tajvana, Tajske in Vietnama.
With regard to the level of duty, in the case of two cooperating exporting producers (one in Taiwan and one in the PRC), the injury elimination level was found to be lower than the dumping margin.
Glede stopnje dajatve se je v primeru dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov (eden v Tajvanu in eden v LRK) stopnja odprave škode izkazala za nižjo od stopnje dampinga.
In these cases, the level of the duty should be restricted to the injury elimination level.
V teh primerih je treba stopnjo dajatve omejiti na stopnjo odprave škode.
In all other cases, the level of the duty should be set at the level of the dumping margin found pursuant to Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation.
V vseh drugih primerih mora biti v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe stopnja dajatve enaka kot ugotovljena stopnja dampinga.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duty rates should be as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega bi morale biti dokončne stopnje dajatve naslednje:
Cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample
Sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki, ki niso bili zajeti v vzorcu
The Thai exporting producers drew attention to Article 15 of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement, which provides that special regard is to be given to the special situation of developing countries when consideration is being given to the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Tajski proizvajalci izvozniki so opozorili na člen 15 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, ki določa, da je treba pri premisleku o uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov posebej upoštevati posebne razmere v državah v razvoju.
However, it was not substantiated that the case at hand affects the essential interests of Thailand, as stipulated by this provision.
Vendar pa ni bilo dokazano, da so v tem primeru osnovni interesi Tajske prizadeti v smislu te določbe.
In these circumstances, it is considered appropriate to impose an anti-dumping duty on imports from Thailand at the abovementioned rates.
V teh okoliščinah se šteje, da je uvedba protidampinške dajatve na uvoz iz Tajske po zgoraj omenjenih stopnjah ustrezna.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe, navedene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev sedanje preiskave.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the countries concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvedejo družbe in torej posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvede katera koli druga družba, ki v izvedbenem delu te uredbe ni posebej navedena z imenom, vključno s pravnimi osebami, povezanimi s tistimi posebej navedenimi, ne morejo biti upravičeni do teh stopenj in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezani s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Če bo primerno, se bo ta uredba ustrezno spremenila s posodobljenim seznamom družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatve.
In view of the magnitude of the dumping margins found and in the light of the level of the injury caused to the Community industry, it is considered necessary that the amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by the provisional Regulation, i.e. Regulation (EC) No 771/2005, be collected definitively to the extent of the amount of the duty definitively imposed by the present Regulation.
Glede na obseg ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in glede na stopnjo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, je treba zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo, uvedeno z začasno uredbo, tj. Uredbo (ES) št. 771/2005, dokončno pobrati v višini zneska dajatve, ki jo dokončno uvaja ta uredba.
For exporting producers whose rate of definitive duty is lower than the provisional duty, the amounts provisionally secured in excess of the definitive duty should be released,
Za proizvajalce izvoznike, katerih stopnja dokončne dajatve je nižja od začasne dajatve, bi morali biti začasno zavarovani zneski, ki presegajo dokončno dajatev, sproščeni –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof, falling within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 and 73181570 and originating in the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Na uvoz določenih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov, ki se uvrščajo pod oznake KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 in 73181570 ter s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indonezije, Tajvana, Tajske in Vietnama, se uvede dokončna protidampinška dajatev.
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products manufactured by the Taiwanese exporting producers listed in the Annex shall be 15,8 % (TARIC additional code A649).
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, pred plačilom dajatve, za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti za izdelke tajvanskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, navedenih v Prilogi, je 15,8 % (dodatna oznaka TARIC A649).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, pred plačilom dajatve, za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj naštete družbe, je:
All companies other than the above and those listed in the Annex
Vse družbe, ki niso navedene zgoraj ali v prilogi
Amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 771/2005 imposing an anti-dumping duty on imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof, falling within CN codes 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 and 73181570 originating in the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam shall be definitively collected, in accordance with the rules set out below.
Zneske, zavarovane z začasno protidampinško dajatvijo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 771/2005 o uvedbi protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenih pritrdilnih elementov in njihovih delov, ki se uvrščajo pod oznake KN 73181210, 73181410, 73181530, 73181551, 73181561 in 73181570, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indonezije, Tajvana, Tajske in Vietnama, se v skladu s pravili, določenimi v nadaljevanju, dokončno poberejo.
The amounts secured in excess of the definitive rates of the anti-dumping duty shall be released.
Zneski, zavarovani z začasno dajatvijo, ki presegajo dokončne stopnje protidampinške dajatve, se sprostijo.
The proceeding concerning imports of certain stainless steel fasteners and parts thereof originating in Malaysia and the Philippines is hereby terminated.
Postopek v zvezi z uvozom določenih pritrdilnih elementov iz nerjavnega jekla in njihovih delov s poreklom iz Malezije in Filipinov se zaključi.
OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 19.
UL L 128, 21.5.2005, str. 19.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate B, J-79 5/17, rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat B, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
(TARIC additional code A649)
(Dodatna oznaka TARIC A649)
A-STAINLESS INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD, Taipei
A-STAINLESS INTERNATIONAL CO LTD, Tajpej
DIING SEN FASTENERS & INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD, Taipei
DIING SEN FASTENERS & INDUSTRIAL CO LTD, Tajpej
JOHN CHEN SCREW IND. CO. LTD, Taipei
JOHN CHEN SCREW IND CO LTD, Tajpej
KWANTEX RESEARCH INC., Taipei
KWANTEX RESEARCH INC, Tajpej
LIH LIN ENTERPRISES & INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD, Taipei
LIH LIN ENTERPRISES & INDUSTRIAL CO LTD, Tajpej
ZYH YIN ENTERPRISE CO. LTD, Kaohsiung.
ZYH YIN ENTERPRISE CO LTD, Kaohsiung.
This is also obvious from the description of the HS-code 731815: ‘other screws or bolts whether or not with their nuts or washers’.
To je razvidno tudi iz opisa oznake HS 731815: „drugi vijaki, sorniki, s svojimi maticami ali podložkami ali brez njih“.
Furthermore, it is pertinent to note that the Community industry does not keep the necessary machinery to produce nuts and did not manifest any intention to produce nuts in the future.
Poleg tega je primerno opozoriti, da industrija Skupnosti nima potrebnih strojev za izdelavo matic in ni izrazila nobenega namena za izdelavo matic v prihodnosti.
Tengzhou Tengda Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd, Tengzhou City 21,5 %
Tengzhou Tengda Stainless Steel Product Co. Ltd., Tengzhou City 21,5 %
Stainless Fasteners Co. Ltd, Ayutthaya 11,1 %
Stainless Fasteners Co. Ltd., Ayutthaya 11,1 %
Bunyat Industries 1998 Co. Ltd, Samutsakorn 10,8 %
Bunyat Industries 1998 Co. Ltd., Samutsakorn 10,8 %
Tong Hwei Enterprise, Co. Ltd, Kaohsiung 16,1 %
Tong Hwei Enterprise Co. Ltd., Kaohsiung 16,1 %
Min Hwei Enterprise Co. Ltd, Pingtung 16,1 %
Min Hwei Enterprise Co. Ltd., Pingtung 16,1 %
Tengzhou Tengda Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd, Tengzhou City
Tengzhou Tengda Stainless Steel Product Co. Ltd., Tengzhou City
Council Regulation (EC) No 1891/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1891/2005
amending Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus, Russia or Ukraine
o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 3068/92 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu kalijevega klorida s poreklom iz Belorusije, Rusije ali Ukrajine
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe,
Previous investigations and existing measures
Prejšnje preiskave in obstoječi ukrepi
Following an investigation (the previous investigation), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 969/2000 [2], amended the measures originally imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 [3] on imports of potassium chloride originating, inter alia, in Russia (the existing measures).
Po preiskavi („prejšnja preiskava“) je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 969/2000 [2] spremenil ukrepe prvotno uvedene z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3068/92 [3] o uvozu kalijevega klorida s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije („obstoječi ukrepi“).
In March 2004, by means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4], the Commission launched, on its own initiative, a partial interim review of the existing measures to examine whether they should be amended to take account of the enlargement of the European Union to 25 Member States on 1 May 2004 (Enlargement).
Marca 2004 je Komisija na lastno pobudo z objavo uradnega obvestila v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] uvedla delni vmesni pregled obstoječih ukrepov, da bi raziskala, ali jih je zaradi širitve Evropske unije na 25 držav članic 1. maja 2004 („širitev“) treba spremeniti.
The results of that partial interim review showed that it was in the interests of the Community to provide for the temporary adaptation of the existing measures so as to avoid a sudden and excessively negative impact on importers and users in the ten new Member States immediately following Enlargement.
Izsledki delnega vmesnega pregleda so pokazali, da je v interesu Skupnosti, da v izogib nenadnemu in pretirano negativnemu učinku na uvoznike in uporabnike v desetih novih državah članicah, takoj po širitvi določi začasno prilagoditev obstoječih ukrepov.
To this end, in May 2004, by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2004 [5], the Commission accepted undertakings from two exporting producers in Russia, namely JSC Silvinit and JSC Uralkali for a period of one year.
V ta namen je maja 2004 Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 1002/2004 [5] sprejela zaveze dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji, in sicer družb JSC Silvinit in JSC Uralkali, za obdobje enega leta.
In June 2005, by Commission Regulation (EC) No 858/2005 [6] new undertakings, which expire on 13 April 2006, were accepted from the two exporting producers in Russia.
Junija 2005 so bile z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 858/2005 [6] sprejete nove zaveze dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji, ki bodo potekle 13. aprila 2006.
In addition, in order to provide for the exemption from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 on imports made under the terms of the undertakings, Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 was amended by Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 [7].
Poleg tega je bila z Uredbo (ES) št. 992/2004 [7] spremenjena Uredba (EGS) št. 3068/92, da bi se pri uvozu v okviru zavez zagotovila oprostitev protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92.
It should also be noted that all references to ‘the Community’ or ‘the Community of 15’ in the present Regulation shall be taken to mean, unless otherwise specified, the Community as constituted immediately before Enlargement.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da vsa sklicevanja na „Skupnost“ ali „Skupnost petnajsterice“ v tej uredbi pomenijo, razen če ni drugače določeno, Skupnost neposredno pred širitvijo.
Grounds for the present reviews
Razlogi za sedanji pregled