natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such direct transfer of funds in the form of loans under certain conditions would normally be vested in the government and, within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a)(iv) of the basic Regulation, the practice, in no real sense, differs from practices normally followed by governments.
Takšen neposreden prenos sredstev v obliki posojil pod določenimi pogoji bi bil običajno v pristojnosti vlade in ta praksa se v smislu člena 2(1)(a)(iv) osnovne uredbe ne razlikuje bistveno od praks, ki jih običajno vlade izvajajo.
Furthermore, this subsidy is deemed to be specific and countervailable since the preferential interest rates are only available in relation to export financing and are therefore contingent upon export performance within the meaning of Article 3(4)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega se ta subvencija šteje za specifično in takšno, da se v zvezi z njo lahko sprejmejo izravnalni ukrepi, ker so preferencialne obrestne mere dostopne samo za financiranje izvoza in torej pogojene z opravljenim izvozom v smislu člena 3(4)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The subsidy amount has been calculated on the basis of the difference between the interest accrued for export credits used during the review investigation period and the amount that would have been payable if the same interest rates were applicable as for ordinary commercial credits used by the applicant.
Znesek subvencije je bil izračunan na podlagi razlike med obrestmi, obračunanimi za izvozne kredite, uporabljene v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, in zneskom, ki bi bil plačljiv, če bi se uporabljale enake obrestne mere, kot veljajo za običajne komercialne kredite, ki jih uporabljal vlagatelj.
This subsidy amount (numerator) has been allocated over the total export turnover during the review investigation period as appropriate denominator in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, because the subsidy is contingent upon export performance and it was not granted by reference to the quantities manufactured, produced, exported or transported.
Ta znesek subvencije (števec) je bil dodeljen na skupni izvozni promet v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom kot ustrezen imenovalec v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe, ker je subvencija pogojena z opravljenim izvozom in ni bila dodeljena glede na izdelane, proizvedene, izvožene ali prevožene količine.
The ECS subsidy rate so established is 0,4 %.
Tako vzpostavljena stopnja subvencije SIK je 0,4 %.
West Bengal Incentive Scheme (WBIS)
Shema industrijskih spodbud Zahodne Bengalije (West Bengal Incentive Scheme (WBIS))
The detailed description of the WBIS is set out in Government of West Bengal (GOWB) Commerce & Industries Department notification No 588-CI/H of 22 June 1999 (WBIS 1999) which was last replaced by notification No 134-CI/O/Incentive/17/03/I of 24 March 2004 (WBIS 2004).
Podroben opis WBIS je določen v Sporočilu vlade Zahodne Bengalije, oddelek za trgovino in industrijo, št. 588-CI/H z dne 22. junija 1999 („WBIS 1999“), nazadnje zamenjan s Sporočilom št. 134-CI/O/Incentive/17/03/I z dne 24. marca 2004 („WBIS 2004“).
The investigation established that the benefit obtained by the applicant was insignificant and, thus, WBIS is not analysed further.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile ugodnosti, ki jih je pridobil vlagatelj, zanemarljive, in zato ni bilo nadaljnje analize WBIS.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF COUNTERVAILABLE SUBSIDIES
CELOTNI ZNESEK SUBVENCIJ, PROTI KATERIM SE LAHKO UVEDEJO IZRAVNALNI UKREPI
Taking account of the definitive findings relating to the schemes as set out above, the rate of countervailable subsidies for the applicant is as follows:
Ob upoštevanju dokončnih ugotovitev v zvezi z zgoraj določenimi shemami je stopnja subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, naslednja:
AMENDMENT OF THE MEASURES BEING REVIEWED
SPREMEMBA UKREPOV, KI SE PREGLEDUJEJO
In accordance with Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, the amount of the countervailing duty should be less than the total amount of countervailable subsidies, if such lesser duty were to be adequate to remove the injury to the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe bi moral biti znesek izravnalnih dajatev manjši kot celoten znesek subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, če taka nižja dajatev zadošča za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
In the original investigation a general injury elimination level of 44,3 % was established, which is higher than the subsidy rate established for the applicant.
V prvotni preiskavi je bila vzpostavljena splošna raven odprave škode 44,3 %, kar je več kot stopnja dajatve, vzpostavljena za vlagatelja.
On the basis of the findings made during the review investigation, it is considered that imports of the product concerned into the Community produced and exported by the applicant should be subject to a level of countervailing duty corresponding to the individual rate of subsidies established for this company, i.e. 13,9 %.
Na podlagi ugotovitev med preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom velja, da bi za uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost, ki ga je proizvedel in izvozil vlagatelj, morala veljati stopnja izravnalne dajatve, ki ustreza individualni stopnji subvencij za to družbo, tj. 13,9 %.
Since the duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 took the form of a specific amount per tonne, the abovementioned duty rate for the applicant has also been converted into a specific amount of EUR 106,5 per tonne.
Ker je dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2603/2000, v obliki posebnega zneska na tono, je bila zgoraj omenjena stopnja dajatve za vlagatelja prav tako spremenjena v poseben znesek 106,5 EUR na tono.
Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 2603/2000 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The applicant offered a price undertaking concerning its exports of the product concerned to the Community, in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Vlagatelj je ponudil cenovno zavezo za svoj izvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost v skladu s členom 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
After examination of the offer, the Commission considered the undertaking as acceptable since it would eliminate the injurious effects of subsidisation.
Po proučitvi ponudbe je Komisija menila, da je zaveza sprejemljiva, saj odpravlja škodljive učinke subvencioniranja.
Moreover, the regular and detailed reports which the applicant undertook to provide to the Commission will allow effective monitoring.
Poleg tega bodo redna in podrobna poročila, za katera se je vlagatelj zavezal, da jih bo zagotovil Komisiji, omogočila učinkovit nadzor.
Furthermore, the nature of the product and the sales structure of the applicant are such that the Commission considers that the risk of circumvention of the undertaking is limited.
Tudi narava izdelka in struktura prodaje vlagatelja sta takšna, da je po mnenju Komisije nevarnost izogibanja dogovorjeni zavezi majhna.
In order to ensure the effective respect and monitoring of the undertaking, when the request for release for free circulation pursuant to the undertaking is presented, exemption from the duty is conditional upon presentation to the customs authorities of the Member State concerned a valid ‘Commercial Invoice’ issued by the applicant and containing the information listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000.
Da se zagotovi učinkovito izpolnjevanje zavez in njihov nadzor, je treba ob predložitvi zahtevka za sprostitev v prost promet, ki je v skladu z zavezo, carinski službi zadevne države članice za oprostitev plačila dajatve predložiti veljavno „trgovinsko fakturo“, ki jo izda vlagatelj in vsebuje podatke, navedene v prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 2603/2000.
Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate rate of the countervailing duty should be payable in order to ensure the effective application of the undertaking.
Če se takšna faktura ne predloži ali če ne ustreza izdelku, predloženemu carinskim organom, bo plačana ustrezna stopnja izravnalne dajatve, da se zagotovi učinkovita uporaba zaveze.
In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking, a countervailing duty may be imposed pursuant to Article 13(9) and (10) of the basic Regulation.
V primeru kršitve ali umika zaveze se v skladu s členoma 13(9) in (10) osnovne uredbe lahko uvede izravnalna dajatev.
DISCLOSURE AND DURATION OF THE MEASURES
RAZKRITJE IN TRAJANJE UKREPOV
The applicant and the GOI were informed of the essential facts and considerations upon which it was intended to propose that Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 be amended and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vlagatelj in indijska vlada sta bila seznanjena z bistvenimi dejstvi in premisleki, na osnovi katerih naj bi se predlagala sprememba Uredbe (ES) št. 2603/2000, ter sta imela možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Only the applicant made comments, essentially on the EOUS, which have been addressed in the context of the respective conclusions under section 2.1.1.(d),
Pripombe, ki jih je predvsem glede SIUE predložil samo vlagatelj, so se upoštevale v ustreznih sklepih zgoraj v točki 2.1.1(d) –
Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 shall be amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 2603/2000 se spremeni, kakor sledi:
In Article 1(3), the following shall be inserted into the table under producers in India:
V preglednico iz člena 1(3) se med proizvajalce v Indiji vstavi naslednje:
(EUR per tonne)
(EUR na tono)
In Article 2(3), the following shall be inserted into the table:
V preglednico iz člena 2(3) se vstavi naslednje:
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 822/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 822/2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 3).
Notification No 1/2002-07 of 31.3.2002 of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the GOI.
Uradno obvestilo št. 1/2002-07 z dne 31.3.2002 Ministrstva za trgovino in industrijo indijske vlade.
Export Credit Scheme, Export Oriented Unit Scheme/Special Economic Zones Scheme,
shema izvozno usmerjenih enot („SIUE“)/shema posebnih ekonomskih con („SPEC“),
ECS
SIC
Council Regulation (EC) No 1646/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1646/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) with a coefficient of viscosity of 78 ml/g or higher, according to DIN (Deutsche Industrienorm) 53728 (the product concerned) normally declared within CN code 39076020 originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2604/2000 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampiško dajatev na uvoz določenega polietilen tereftalata (PET) s koeficientom viskoznosti 78 ml/g ali več, v skladu z DIN (Deutsche Industrienorm) 53728 („zadevni izdelek“), navadno uvrščen pod oznako KN 39076020 s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
The measures take the form of a specific duty rate of EUR 181,7 per tonne with the exception of imports from several companies expressly mentioned which are subject to individual duty rates.
Ukrepi se uvedejo kot posebna stopnja dajatve 181,7 EUR na tono z izjemo uvoza posameznih izrecno omenjenih družb, za katere veljajo individualne stopnje dajatev.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 [3], imposed at the same time a definitive countervailing duty of EUR 41,3 per tonne on imports into the Community of the same product originating in India, with the exception of imports from several companies expressly mentioned which are subject to individual duty rates.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2603/2000 [3] istočasno uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev 41,3 EUR na tono za uvoz enakega izdelka s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije, v Skupnost, z izjemo uvoza posameznih izrecno omenjenih družb, za katere veljajo individualne stopnje dajatev.
Subsequent to the imposition of definitive measures, the Commission received an application to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review of Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000, pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, from an Indian exporting producer, i.e. South Asian Petrochem Limited (the company).
Po vzpostavitvi dokončnih ukrepov je Komisija od indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika, tj. South Asian Petrochem Limited („družba“), prejela zahtevek za začetek pregleda za „novega izvoznika“ iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000, v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The company claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers in India subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Družba je trdila, da ni povezana z nobenim proizvajalcem izvoznikom v Indiji, za katerega se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom izvajajo veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Furthermore, it claimed that it had not exported the product concerned during the original period of investigation (1 October 1998 to 30 September 1999), but had exported the product concerned to the Community after that period.
Trdila je tudi, da zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost ni izvažala v prvotnem obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 1998 do 30. septembra 1999), pač pa je zadevni izdelek v Skupnost izvažala po navedenem obdobju.
The Commission examined the evidence submitted by the company and considered it sufficient to justify the initiation of a review in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila dokaze, ki jih je predložila družba, in ugotovila, da so zadostni za utemeljitev začetka pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
After the consultation of the Advisory Committee and after the Community industry concerned had been given the opportunity to comment, the Commission initiated, by Regulation (EC) No 33/2005 [4], a review of Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 with regard to the company and commenced its investigation.
Potem ko se je Komisija posvetovala s svetovalnim odborom in je zadevni industriji Skupnosti dala možnost za pripombe, je z Uredbo (ES) št. 33/2005 [4] začela pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000 v zvezi z družbo in začela preiskavo.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 33/2005, the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 was repealed with regard to imports of the product concerned produced and exported to the Community by the company.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 33/2005 je bila razveljavljena protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2604/2000 za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je družba proizvajala in izvažala v Skupnost.
Simultaneously, customs authorities were directed, pursuant to Article 14(5) of the basic Regulation, to take appropriate steps to register such imports.
Istočasno so carinski organi v skladu s členom 14(5) osnovne uredbe dobili navodilo, da uvedejo ustrezne ukrepe za registriranje tega uvoza.
At the same time and on the same grounds, following a request from the company, the Commission initiated an accelerated review of Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 pursuant to Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [5].
Istočasno in iz istih razlogov je Komisija po prejemu zahtevka družbe začela pospešen pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 2603/2000 v skladu s členom 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [5].
Parties concerned
Stranke v postopku
The Commission officially informed the company and representatives of India (the exporting country) of the initiation of the ‘new exporter’ review.
Komisija je uradno obvestila družbo in predstavnike Indije („država izvoznica“) o začetku pregleda za „novega izvoznika“.
However, no such request was received by the Commission.
Vendar Komisija ni prejela nobenega takšnega zahtevka.
The Commission sent a questionnaire to the company and received a reply within the deadline.
Komisija je družbi poslala vprašalnik in v roku prejela odgovor.
The Commission also sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the determination of dumping.
Komisija je tudi poiskala in preverila vse podatke, ki so bili po njenem mnenju potrebni za določitev dampinga.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of the company.
Opravljen je bil obisk zaradi preveritve poslovnih prostorov družbe.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2004 (the investigation period).
Preiskava dampinga je zajela obdobje od 1. oktobra 2003 do 30. septembra 2004 („obdobje preiskave“).
RESULT OF THE INVESTIGATION
RAZULTAT PREISKAVE
The investigation confirmed that the company had not exported the product concerned during the original period of investigation and that it had begun exporting to the Community after this period.
Preiskava je potrdila, da družba v prvotnem obdobju preiskave ni izvažala zadevnega izdelka in da ga je začela v Skupnost izvažati po tem obdobju.
Furthermore, the company was able to satisfactorily demonstrate that it did not have any links, direct or indirect, with any of the Indian exporting producers subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to the product concerned.
Družba je lahko tudi zadovoljivo dokazala, da ni neposredno ali posredno povezana z nobenim indijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katerega se v zvezi z zadevnim izdelkom uporabljajo veljavni protidampinški ukrepi.
Accordingly, it is confirmed that the company should be considered a ‘new exporter’ in accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, and thus an individual margin should be determined for it.
Prav tako je potrjeno, da je družbo treba obravnavati kot „novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe in je zato treba zanjo določiti individualno stopnjo dampinga.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the company’s total domestic sales of PET were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej proučila, ali je celotna domača prodaja družbe izdelka PET reprezentativna v primerjavi z njeno celotno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost.
Since these sales amounted to more than 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community, they were considered representative.
Ker je ta prodaja znašala več kot 5 % njene celotne izvozne prodaje v Skupnost, se je štela kot reprezentativna.
The Commission subsequently identified those types of PET sold domestically by the company that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je nato določila tiste vrste PET, ki jih je družba prodala na domačem trgu in so bili enaki ali neposredno primerljivi z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
The investigation revealed that only two product types exported to the Community are identical or directly comparable to the products sold on the domestic market.
Preiskava je pokazala, da sta samo dve vrsti izdelkov, izvoženi v Skupnost, enaki ali neposredno primerljivi z izdelki, prodanimi na domačem trgu.
For each of these two product types it was then examined whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative with respect to the corresponding export sales.
Za vsako od teh dveh vrst izdelka je bilo proučeno, ali je bila domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna glede na ustrezno izvozno prodajo.
Since the domestic sales of each of these types were significantly above the 5 % threshold, both product types were considered representative.
Ker je bila domača prodaja obeh vrst precej nad mejo 5 %, sta se obe vrsti izdelka šteli kot reprezentativni.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each product type could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of the sales volume of the like product sold at a net sales price equal to or above the cost of production (profitable sales) to independent customers of the type in question.
Z ugotavljanjem deleža prodaje primerljivega izdelka po neto prodajnih cenah, ki so enake ali višje kot proizvodni stroški (dobičkonosna prodaja), neodvisnim odjemalcem se je proučilo tudi, ali se lahko domačo prodajo posameznih vrst zadevnega izdelka šteje za običajen potek trgovine.
Since the volume of profitable sales of the product concerned represented less than 80 % but 10 % or more of the total sales volume, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of each type only.
Ker je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje zadevnega izdelka predstavljal manj kot 80 %, vendar 10 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje posamezne vrste.
Since all export sales of the product concerned to the Community were made directly to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Ker se je zadevni izdelek izvažal neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, se pravi na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between normal value and export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da se zagotovi nepristranska primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, so bile razlike, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cene, ustrezno popravljene v obliki prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
All the allowances claimed by the company on export sales have been accepted.
Vsi popravki, ki jih je glede izvozne prodaje zahtevala družba, so bili sprejeti.
These allowances are related to commissions, inland freight, ocean freight, insurance, handling charges, packaging expenses and bank charges.
Ti popravki se nanašajo na provizije, kopenske in čezmorske prevozne stroške, zavarovanje, manipulativne stroške, stroške embaliranja in bančne stroške.
On domestic sales, allowances claimed for commissions, inland freight, insurance, packaging expenses and bank charges were accepted.
Glede domače prodaje so bili popravki v zvezi s provizijami, kopenskimi prevoznimi stroški, zavarovanjem, stroški embaliranja in bančnimi stroški sprejeti.
However, allowances claimed by the company for indirect tax and import charges on the basis of Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation and branch office expenses on the basis of Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation were rejected for the reasons set out below.
Vendar so bili popravki, ki jih je družba zahtevala za posredni davek in uvozne dajatve na podlagi člena 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe ter za stroške podružnice na podlagi člena 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe, zavrnjeni zaradi spodaj navedenih razlogov.
The claimed allowance for indirect taxes is based on the argument that the company’s domestic customers paid a non-recoverable amount of excise duty when purchasing the product concerned on the domestic market, whereas the company’s export customers were not subject to such duty.
Zahtevek za popravek posrednih davkov temelji na trditvi, da so domače stranke zadevne družbe ob nakupu zadevnega izdelka na domačem trgu plačale znesek trošarine, ki ga ni mogoče povrniti, medtem ko za izvozne stranke družbe takšna dajatev ni veljala.
This non-recoverable excise duty amount was claimed as an adjustment to normal value.
Zahtevan je bil popravek normalne vrednosti, da bi se upošteval ta znesek trošarine, ki ga ni mogoče povrniti.
However, the normal value which was compared to the export price was established on the basis of the net domestic sales price excluding all taxes.
Vendar je bila normalna vrednost, primerjana z izvozno ceno, določena na podlagi neto cene domače prodaje brez vseh davkov.