natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On an exporting producer basis these margins were found to range between 11,5 and 17,1 %.
Glede na proizvajalca izvoznika so te stopnje znašale med 11,5 % in 17,1 %.
Consequently, these price undercutting margins indicate continuous price pressure exerted by the Indian imports on the Community market despite the existence of measures.
Te stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen tako kažejo na stalen cenovni pritisk indijskega uvoza na trg Skupnosti, kljub obstoju ukrepov.
V. Economic situation of the Community industry
V. Gospodarsko stanje industrije Skupnosti
Index production
Indeks proizvodnje
Index capacity
Indeks zmogljivosti
Index capacity utilisation
Indeks izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti
As a consequence of the steady increase in Community consumption, the Community industry’s production of the like product increased continuously over the period considered.
Kot posledica uravnoteženega naraščanja porabe Skupnosti, je proizvodnja podobnega izdelka industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju stalno naraščala.
This positive trend became more pronounced during the review investigation period when one of the cooperating Community producers started the production in the Community of one type of the like product which it only had imported previously.
Ta pozitiven trend je postal bolj izrazit v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, ko je eden izmed sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v Skupnosti začel izdelovati eno vrsto podobnega izdelka, ki jo je prej samo uvažal.
The production capacity of the Community industry showed the same positive trend as its production.
Proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti je kazala enak pozitiven trend kot njena proizvodnja.
This is partly due to important investments in a new production plant which were made during the review investigation period by one of the cooperating Community producers.
To je bila deloma posledica pomembnih vlaganj v nov proizvodni obrat“, ki jih je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom izvajal eden izmed sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The capacity utilisation rate has been stable at a relatively high level over the period considered.
Stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti je bila v obravnavanem obdobju stabilna in na relativno visoki ravni.
Such a high rate of utilisation is common in this type of industry, because of the continuous batch process utilised for the manufacture of the like product and in the case of the Community industry in addition due to its captive use.
Tako visoka stopnja izkoriščenosti je v tej vrsti industrije običajna, zaradi nepretrganega serijskega postopka, ki se uporablja pri proizvodnji podobnega izdelka, v primeru industrije Skupnosti, pa tudi zaradi omejene uporabe.
Three exporters submitted upon disclosure that the development of these factors does not show any sign of injury.
Trije izvozniki so ob razkritju trdili, da razvoj teh dejavnikov ne kaže znakov škode.
However, it is noted that the conclusion on injury has not been based on these factors.
Toda opozarja se, da zaključek o škodi ne temelji na teh dejavnikih.
Sales volume, sales price, market share and growth
Obseg prodaje, prodajna cena, tržni delež in rast
Free market sales
prodaja na prostem trgu
Free market sales in the Community
Prodaja na prostem trgu v Skupnosti
Index volume
Indeks Obseg
Index average sales price
Indeks Povprečna prodajna cena
Index market share
Indeks Tržni delež
Based on the favourable evolution of Community consumption, the volume of free market sales of the Community industry in the Community increased over the period considered.
Na osnovi ugodnega razvoja porabe Skupnosti je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu v Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju narasel.
The Community industry’s free market sales volume showed a higher growth than the growth of Community consumption during the period considered.
Obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu v obravnavanem obdobju kaže višjo rast od porabe Skupnosti.
However, between 2000 and the review investigation period, the increase of the Community industry’s free market sales volume was less than the increase of the Community consumption.
Vendar pa je bila med letom 2000 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom rast obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu manjša od rasti porabe Skupnosti.
The large increase of the Community industry’s free market sales volume between 1999 and 2000 is mainly attributable to the taking over of another Community producer by the Community industry.
Veliko povečanje obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu med letoma 1999 in 2000 je v glavnem posledica prevzemov drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti s strani industrije Skupnosti.
Nevertheless, the 80 % increase of the free market sales volume of the Community industry in the Community during the period considered was less pronounced than the 159 % increase of imports of the product concerned during the same period.
Kljub temu je 80 % povečanje obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu v Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju manj izrazito kot 159 % povečanje uvoza zadevnega izdelka v istem obdobju.
The GOI and four exporters pointed to the overall increase in sales of the Community industry as a positive sign and contended that it does not support an injury finding.
IV in štirje izvozniki so opozorili na skupno povečanje prodaje industrije Skupnosti kot pozitiven znak in ugovarjali, da nasprotuje ugotovitvi škode.
It was further submitted that a comparison of the Community industry’s performance with the one of Indian exporters in relative terms would be misleading due to significant difference in the size of the competitors.
Poleg tega so pripomnili, da bi bila relativna primerjava med uspešnostjo industrije Skupnosti in enim izmed indijskih izvoznikov zavajajoča zaradi bistvene razlike v velikosti konkurentov.
In reply to these submissions it should be noted that sales volume development has not been considered in the present case as a key factor indicating the extent of injury suffered.
V odgovor na te pripombe je treba omeniti, da se v tem primeru razvoj obsega prodaje ne pojmuje kot ključni faktor, ki kaže na obseg povzročene škode.
However, since the growth in sales for the Community industry can largely be attributed to a take over in 2000, i.e. the integration of the sales of a former competitor as opposed to new sales, it cannot be considered as an indicator for the absence of injury either.
Ker je rast prodaje industrije Skupnosti mogoče v glavnem pripisati prevzemu leta 2000, tj. združitvi prodaje bivših konkurentov, in ne novi prodaji, je ni mogoče pojmovati niti kot dokaz, da škode ni bilo.
Furthermore, in 2001 and during the IP the sales volume of the Community industry on the free market decreased.
Poleg tega je leta 2001 in med OP obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu upadel.
Despite growing demand indicated by the increased Community consumption, average free market sales prices of the Community industry declined from 1999 to 2000.
Navkljub naraščajočemu povpraševanju, ki ga nakazuje povečana poraba Skupnosti, so povprečne prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu od leta 1999 do 2000 padale.
This indicates price pressure exercised by competitors.
To nakazuje cenovni pritisk konkurentov.
Prices remained practically stable at the lower level up to the end of the review investigation period although demand further grew.
Cene so do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ostale skoraj povsem stabilne na nižji ravni, kljub nadaljnji rasti povpraševanja.
The GOI and three exporters claimed that the price development should be considered as positive for the Community industry.
IV in trije izvozniki so trdili, da bi se moral razvoj cen pojmovati kot pozitiven za industrijo Skupnosti.
This claim cannot be accepted.
Ta trditev ne more biti sprejeta.
In fact, during the period considered the Community industry was at no time in the position to achieve non-injurious price levels.
Dejansko v obravnavanem obdobju industrija Skupnosti nikoli ni bila v položaju, da bi dosegala neškodljive ravni cen.
The Community industry increased its market share by 30 % from 1999 to 2000 to the detriment of the market shares held by the other Community producers and exporters from third countries other than India.
Industrija Skupnosti je od 1999 do 2000 povečala svoj tržni delež za 30 % na škodo tržnih deležev drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti in izvoznikov iz tretjih držav, razen Indije.
However, the Community industry’s market share fell from 2000 to the review investigation period when it reached its lowest level since 1999.
Vendar pa je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti od 2000 do obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom padal, dokler ni dosegel najnižjo vrednost od leta 1999.
This period coincided with a strong acceleration in growth of the share of imports from India.
To obdobje je sovpadalo z močno povečano rastjo deleža uvoza iz Indije.
One exporter argued that the decrease in market share of the Community industry in 2001 and the IP would be insignificant in light of the increase in 2000 and it further pointed to its overall increase in market share over the period considered.
En izvoznik je trdil, da je zmanjšanje tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti leta 2001 in v OP v primerjavi s povečanjem leta 2000 nepomembno, in opozoril na skupno povečanje tržnega deleža v obravnavanem obdobju.
However, this submission cannot be accepted, because it is based on an isolated focus 1999 versus the IP, which moreover neglects the exceptional nature of the increase in the year 2000.
Vendar pa ta trditev ne more biti sprejeta, ker temelji na izoliranem izpostavljanju leta 1999 nasproti OP, ki poleg tega zanemarja izjemno povečanje v letu 2000.
No explanation has been provided by this exporter why this obviously digressive development of the Community industry’s free market share after 2000 should not be considered as negative.
Izvoznik ni predložil nobenih dokazov, zakaj očitno padajoč razvoj tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu po letu 2000 ne bi smel biti opredeljen kot negativen.
In this context, two other exporters argued that, given the more positive development on the captive market, this would be the result of a deliberate choice of the Community industry to opt for the more profitable formulations market.
Dva druga izvoznika sta glede tega trdila, da je to, zaradi bolj pozitivnega razvoja na omejenem trgu, posledica zavestne odločitve industrije Skupnosti za usmeritev v bolj donosen trg formulacij.
This argument cannot be accepted as it ignores the increased stock which could have been sold to the free market.
Ta argument ne more biti sprejet, ker ne upošteva povečanih zalog, ki bi bile lahko prodane na prostem trgu.
Captive sales
omejene prodaje
Captive sales in the Community
Omejena prodaja v Skupnosti
While the Community industry’s sales volume on the free market increased by 80 % over the period considered, sales on the captive market increased by 89 %.
Medtem ko se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na prostem trgu v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 80 %, se je prodaja na omejenem trgu povečala za 89 %.
In particular since 2001 an expansion on the Community industry’s captive market can be observed, whereas its situation on the free market remained practically unchanged.
Zlasti je opaziti povečanje omejenega trga industrije Skupnosti po letu 2001, medtem ko je njen položaj na prostem trgu ostal praktično nespremenjen.
This coincides with a strong increase of imports from India on the free market, which implies that the Community industry used its option to switch markets at least to a certain extent in order to avoid direct competition with subsidised imports of the product concerned at low prices.
To sovpada z močnim povečanjem uvoza iz Indije na prostem trgu, kar nakazuje, da je industrija Skupnosti vsaj v določeni meri uporabila možnost menjave trga, da bi se izognila neposredni konkurenci subvencioniranega uvoza zadevnega izdelka po nizkih cenah.
A similar pattern can be observed by examining comparatively the trends in growth of the Community industry’s market share both on the free and on the captive market.
Podoben vzorec je opaziti pri primerjavi trendov rasti tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti na prostem in omejenem trgu.
This again indicates an increasing strategic relevance of the captive market for the Community industry since 2001.
To spet nakazuje povečan strateški pomen omejenega trga za industrijo Skupnosti od leta 2001.
Whereas prices on the free market started to decrease already in 2000, the transfer prices on the captive market continued to increase moderately until 2001.
Medtem ko so cene na prostem trgu začele padati že leta 2000, so transferne cene na omejenem trgu do leta 2001 zmerno naraščale.
However, with a time lag, starting in 2002 prices on the captive market showed a downward trend as well.
Vendar pa so, s časovnim zamikom, leta 2002 tudi cene na omejenem trgu začele kazati negativen trend.
This could be explained by the fact that transfer prices are generally not adjusted that quickly, because they are not shaped by direct competition.
To je mogoče razložiti z dejstvom, da se transferne cene običajno ne prilagodijo tako hitro, ker jih ne oblikuje neposredna konkurenca.
It is noted that the overall movement in prices of free market and captive sales during the period considered are similar.
Opozarja se, da sta trenda prodajnih cen na prostem in omejenem trgu v obravnavanem obdobju podobna.
The Community industry’s year-end stock levels in relation to production dropped by 26 % from 1999 to 2000 but then sharply increased by more than 115 % towards the end of the review investigation period.
Višina zalog industrije Skupnosti ob koncu leta glede na proizvodnjo je od 1999 do 2000 padla za 26 %, potem pa do konca obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom močno narasla za več kot 115 %.
This increase coincided in time with a doubling of the Indian imports over the same period.
To povečanje sovpada s podvojitvijo indijskega uvoza v istem obdobju.
The GOI and four exporters contended that the increase in stocks was not abnormally high, thus not showing injury.
IV in štirje izvozniki so trdili, da povečanje zalog ni nenormalno visoko in torej ni škodljivo.
Furthermore, the methodology of using year-end stock levels was contested.
Poleg tega so oporekali metodologiji uporabe količin zalog ob koncu leta.
Instead, other approaches, like moving average stock levels or stocks in terms of number of days sales, were suggested as more appropriate indicators.
Namesto tega so kot bolj primerne kazalce predlagali druge pristope, kot je premično povprečje količin zalog ali zaloge v obliki števila dnevne prodaje.
In reply to this submission it should be noted that the standard methodology of the Community to quantify stock levels was applied.
V odgovor na to pripombo je treba opozoriti, da je bila uporabljena standardna metodologija Skupnosti za kvantifikacijo višine zalog.
The approach is objective and in line with WTO obligations.
Ta pristop je objektiven in v skladu z obveznostmi do WTO.
Secondly, on the basis of verified facts it cannot be denied that stock levels increased sharply.
Poleg tega na osnovi preverjenih podatkov ni mogoče zanikati, da se je količina zalog močno povečala.
(Free market sales in the Community)
(prodaja na prostem trgu v Skupnosti)
The profitability of the Community industry expressed in terms of return on net sales on the free market improved significantly from a loss-making situation in 1999.
Dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti, izražena kot prihodki od neto prodaje na prostem trgu, se je leta 1999 znatno izboljšala od stanja ustvarjanja izgube.
Following the imposition of the existing measures in 1998, profitability increased up to 2001, but then deteriorated sharply towards the review investigation period.
Po uvedbi obstoječih ukrepov leta 1998 se je dobičkonosnost povečevala do leta 2001, potem pa se je močno zmanjšala do obdobja preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
In addition, it is pertinent that the Community industry was at no time during the period considered in a position to reach even half of the profit margin, which, according to the findings in the original investigation, it could reasonably have obtained in the absence of subsidised imports, i.e. 15 %.
Pomembno je tudi, da industrija Skupnosti nikoli v obravnavanem obdobju ni bila v položaju, da bi dosegla polovico stopnje dobička, ki bi jo glede na ugotovitve prvotne preiskave lahko dosegla ob odsotnosti subvencioniranega uvoza, tj. 15 %.
The development of the profitability and in particular its decline since 2002 is considered very important as it affects the level of financial resources available to the Community industry for investments in research and development that are necessary for further improvements to the production processes of existing products and the development of new products.
Razvoj dobičkonosnosti in zlasti njen upad po letu 2002 se pojmujeta kot zelo pomembna, ker vplivata na raven finančnih sredstev, s katerimi razpolaga industrija Skupnosti za vlaganje v raziskave in razvoj, ki je nujno za nadaljnje izboljšave proizvodnega postopka obstoječih izdelkov in razvoj novih izdelkov.
The GOI and four exporters submitted comments on the profitability analysis.
IV in štirje izvozniki so predložili pripombe na analizo dobičkonosnosti.
It was submitted that, (i) the Community industry achieved reasonable profitability levels, (ii) a non-injurious profitability margin of 10 % (see recital 260), would be too high and instead 5 % is sufficient, (iii) the profitability decline could be essentially attributed to the investment policy of the Community industry, (iv) the start up activities of one party qualify for self inflicted injury and (v) the profitability development should have been disclosed for each Community producer.
Trdili so, da (i) je industrija Skupnosti dosegla primerne stopnje dobičkonosnosti, (ii) bi bila neškodljiva stopnja dobička v višini 10 % (glej uvodno izjavo (260)) previsoka in bi zadostovalo že 5 %, (iii) je upad dobičkonosnosti v glavnem mogoče pripisati politiki vlaganja industrije Skupnosti, (iv) se zagon ene stranke pojmuje kot sebi povzročena škoda in da (v) bi moral biti razvoj dobičkonosnosti razkrit za vsakega proizvajalca Skupnosti.
It is reiterated that the Community industry was at no time, during the period considered, in a position to achieve reasonable profit margins as set out above.
Ponoviti je treba, da industrija Skupnosti nikoli v obravnavanem obdobju ni bila v položaju, da bi dosegala primerne stopnje dobička, kot so določene zgoraj.
Thus, the deterioration since 2002 only worsened an already unsatisfactory situation.
Tako je poslabšanje od leta 2002 samo še poslabšalo že tako nezadovoljivo stanje.
Further, in view of the special circumstances of the pharmaceutical sector a profit margin of 5 % is considered not to be sufficient.
Poleg tega se zaradi posebnih okoliščin v farmacevtskem sektorju 5 % stopnja dobička ne šteje za zadostno.
The Community industry has provided evidence that it can achieve for comparable bulk drugs profit figures of above 10 %.
Industrija Skupnosti je predložila dokaze, da lahko za primerljiva zdravila na debelo doseže donos nad 10 %.
Such profit levels are necessary to provide the pharmaceutical sector sustainably with the necessary financial resources to carry on pharmaceutical innovation with its high inherent economic risks.
Takšne stopnje dobičkonosnosti so nujne za trajen dotok potrebnih finančnih sredstev farmacevtskega sektorja za izvajanje farmacevtskih inovacij, ki so po svoji naravi gospodarsko tvegane.
In addition, the lack of reasonable profit margins achieved by the Community industry cannot just be explained by its investment policy.
Poleg tega neustreznih stopenj dobička, ki jih dosega industrija Skupnosti, ni mogoče razložiti samo z njeno politiko vlaganj.
Only one Community producer was in a start up phase during the period considered, but neither party achieved reasonable profit margins.
Samo en proizvajalec Skupnosti je bil v obravnavanem obdobju v fazi zagona, vendar nobena stranka ni dosegla ustreznih stopenj dobička.
Finally, in view of Article 29 of the basic Regulation (‘confidentiality’) it is not possible to disclose further details.
In končno, v smislu člena 29 osnovne uredbe („zaupnost“) ni mogoče razkriti nadaljnjih podrobnosti.
(Captive sales in the Community)
(omejene prodaje v Skupnosti)
The profitability trends of captive sales follow the same line, although on a higher level, i.e. increasing until 2001 and consecutively diminishing.
Trendi dobičkonosnosti za omejene prodaje so podobni, čeprav na višji ravni, torej naraščajo do leta 2001 in potem padajo.
The differences in profitability levels can mainly be attributed to the facts that, (i) selling general and administrative costs (SG & A) for captive sales are lower, because they do not necessitate marketing costs, and (ii) to higher transfer prices as compared with prices on the free market.
Razlike v ravni dobičkonosnosti je mogoče v glavnem pripisati dejstvu, da (i) so prodajni splošni in administrativni stroški („S&AS“) za omejeno prodajo nižji, ker oglaševalski stroški niso potrebni in (ii) da so transferne cene višje v primerjavi s cenami na prostem trgu.
In the absence of the higher profit levels achieved on captive sales, the industry would be in a worse overall financial situation.
Če industrija ne bi dosegala višje stopnje dobička pri omejeni prodaji, bi bila v še slabšem finančnem položaju.
Investments, return on investment, cash flow and the ability to raise capital
Naložbe, donosnost naložb, denarni tok in sposobnost zbiranja kapitala
Index investments
Indeks Naložbe
Index return on investment
Indeks Donosnost naložb
Index cash flow
Indeks Denarni tok
After 1999, the Community industry continually made investments for the manufacture of the like product.
Po letu 1999 je industrija Skupnosti stalno vlagala v proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka.
In particular in 2002, it strongly invested in new production techniques in order to remain competitive, improve environmental and security standards and increase production capacities.
Zlasti leta 2002 je močno vlagala v nove proizvodne tehnike, da bi ostala konkurenčna, izboljšala okoljske in varnostne standarde in povečala proizvodne zmogljivosti.
From 1999 to 2001, i.e. after the imposition of measures, return on investment improved.
Od 1999 do 2001, tj. po uvedbi ukrepov, se je donosnost naložb izboljšala.
Since then, however, it strongly declined.
Po tem pa je močno padla.
Although this can be partially attributed to the start-up phase of one new production plant, the unsatisfactory profitability situation, caused by competitors’ price pressure, contributed to this situation.
Čeprav je to mogoče delno pripisati zagonski fazi novega proizvodnega obrata, je na takšno stanje vplivalo tudi nezadovoljivo stanje dobičkonosnosti, ki ga je povzročil cenovni pritisk konkurentov.
During the period considered, the fluctuations of the cash flow generated by the sales of the like product are to a certain extent the consequence of the Community industry’s investment policy during this period.
V obravnavanem obdobju je nihanje denarnih tokov od prodaje podobnega izdelka v določeni meri posledica politike vlaganja industrije Skupnosti v tem obdobju.
However, the drastic decline in cash flow between 2002 and the review investigation period cannot only be explained by this factor.
Vendar pa drastičen upad denarnih tokov med letom 2002 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom ni posledica tega dejavnika.
Price pressure exercised by competitors contributed to the unsatisfactory cash flow development as well.
Na nezadovoljiv razvoj denarnih tokov je vplival tudi cenovni pritisk konkurentov.
The Community industry did not experience any significant difficulty to raise capital.
Industrija Skupnosti ni imela večjih težav pri zbiranju kapitala.