natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Council Decision 2005/211/JHA of 24 February 2005 concerning the introduction of some new functions for the Schengen Information System, including in the fight against terrorism [1], and in particular to Article 2(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2005/211/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o uvedbi nekaterih novih funkcij za schengenski informacijski sistem, vključno v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu [1], in zlasti člena 2(4) Sklepa,
Those preconditions have been fulfilled in respect of Article 1(7) of Decision 2005/211/JHA, new Article 100(3)(f).
Omenjeni predpogoji so bili izpolnjeni v skladu s členom 1(7) Sklepa 2005/211/PNZ, novi člen 100, točka (3)(f).
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the association of the Swiss Confederation with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [2], which falls in the area referred to in Article 1(G) of Decision 1999/437/EC [3] read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of the Council Decisions 2004/849/EC [4] on the signing on behalf of the European Union and 2004/860/EC [5] on the signing on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Agreement,
Glede Švice predstavlja ta sklep nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [2], ki sodijo v področje točke G člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES [3] v povezavi s členom 4(1) sklepov Sveta 2004/849/ES o podpisu v imenu Evropske unije [4] in 2004/860/ES [5] o podpisu v imenu Evropske skupnosti ter o začasni uporabi nekaterih določb tega sporazuma –
Article 1(7) of Decision 2005/211/JHA, new Article 100(3)(f), shall apply from 31 March 2006.
Člen 1(7) Sklepa 2005/211/PNZ, novi člen 100, točka (3)(f), se uporablja od 31. marca 2006.
OJ L 368, 15.12.2004, p. 26.
UL L 370, 17.12.2004, str. 78.
OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 78.
UL L 368, 15.12.2004, str. 26.
Council Decision 2006/229/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2006/229/PNZ
Those preconditions have been fulfilled in respect of Article 1(7) of Decision 2005/211/JHA, new Article 100(3)(e).
Omenjeni predpogoji so bili izpolnjeni v skladu s členom 1(7) Sklepa 2005/211/PNZ, novi člen 100, točka (3)(e).
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the association of the Swiss Confederation with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [2], which falls in the area referred to in Article 1, point G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC [3] read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Council Decisions 2004/849/EC [4] on the signing on behalf of the European Union and 2004/860/EC [5] on the signing on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Agreement,
Glede Švice predstavlja ta sklep nadaljnji razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu sporazuma, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [2], ki sodijo v področje točke G člena 1 Sklepa 1999/437/ES [3] v povezavi s členom 4(1) sklepov Sveta 2004/860/ES z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o podpisu v imenu Evropske unije [4] in 2004/849/ES [5] z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o podpisu v imenu Evropske skupnosti, ter o začasni uporabi nekaterih določb tega sporazuma –
Article 1(7) of Decision 2005/211/JHA, new Article 100(3)(e), shall apply from 31 March 2006.
Člen 1(7) Sklepa 2005/211/PNZ, novi člen 100, točka (3)(e), se uporablja od 31. marca 2006.
of 21 March 2006
z dne 21. marca 2006
on special conditions governing fishery products imported from Indonesia and intended for human consumption
o posebnih pogojih za ribiške proizvode, uvožene iz Indonezije in namenjene za prehrano ljudi
(notified under document number C(2006) 843)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 843)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [2] and in particular Article 53(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [2], in zlasti člena 53(1) Uredbe,
In accordance with Directive 97/78/EC and Regulation (EC) 178/2002, the necessary measures must be adopted as regards imports of products from third countries that appear to involve any serious hazard for animal or human health or where such a hazard is on the increase.
V skladu z Direktivo 97/78/ES in Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 je treba sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za uvoz proizvodov iz tretjih držav, kadar bi ti lahko resno ogrozili zdravje živali ali ljudi, ali če možnost take nevarnosti narašča.
Histamine and heavy metals have been detected in fishery products imported from Indonesia and intended for human consumption.
V ribiških proizvodih, uvoženih iz Indonezije, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi, so bili odkriti histamin in težke kovine.
The presence of these substances in food presents a potential risk for human health.
Prisotnost teh snovi v hrani pomeni možno tveganje za zdravje ljudi.
Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products [3] establishes the sampling and analysis procedure for histamine and the authorised levels for the latter.
Direktiva Sveta 91/493/EGS z dne 22. julija 1991 o zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in dajanje na trg ribiških proizvodov [3] določa postopek vzorčenja in analiz histamina ter dovoljene mejne vrednosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) 466/2001 of 8 March 2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs [4] lays down maximum levels of heavy metals that are permitted in fish.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 466/2001 z dne 8. marca 2001 o določitvi mejnih vrednosti nekaterih kontaminantov v živilih [4] določa dovoljene mejne vrednosti težkih kovin v ribah.
The results of the latest Community inspection visits to Indonesia have revealed serious shortcomings as regards hygiene in the handling of fishery products.
Rezultati zadnjih inšpekcijskih obiskov Skupnosti v Indoneziji so pokazali resne pomanjkljivosti glede higiene pri ravnanju z ribiškimi proizvodi.
Such shortcomings mean that the fish is not as fresh as it should be and spoils quickly, with attendant high levels of histamine in the relevant species.
Pomanjkljivosti so v tem, da ribe niso tako sveže, kot bi morale biti, in se hitro pokvarijo ter da so v zadevnih vrstah prisotne visoke vrednosti histamina.
The inspections have also revealed serious shortcomings in the capacity of the Indonesian authorities to carry out reliable checks of fish, in particular to detect histamine and heavy metals in the relevant species.
Inšpekcijski pregledi so prav tako pokazali resne pomanjkljivosti pri zmogljivosti indonezijskih organov za izvajanje zanesljivih pregledov rib, zlasti pri odkrivanju histamina in težkih kovin v zadevnih vrstah.
Member States should carry out the appropriate checks of fishery products from Indonesia on arrival at the Community border in order to prevent products unfit for human consumption from being placed on the market.
Da države članice preprečijo dajanje na trg proizvodov, neprimernih za prehrano ljudi, morajo na meji Skupnosti izvajati ustrezne preglede ribiških proizvodov, ki prispejo iz Indonezije.
Regulation (EC) 178/2002 sets up the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed, which should used to implement the mutual information requirement provided for in Article 22(2) of Directive 97/78/EC.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 je vzpostavljen sistem hitrega opozarjanja za živila in krmo, ki se mora uporabljati pri izvajanju zahteve o medsebojnem obveščanju iz člena 22(2) Direktive 97/78/ES.
In addition the Member States will keep the Commission informed through periodical reports of all analytical results of official controls carried out in respect of consignments of fishery products from Indonesia.
Poleg tega morajo države članice Komisijo obveščati glede pošiljk ribiških proizvodov iz Indonezije z rednimi poročili o vseh rezultatih analiz uradnega nadzora.
This Decision should be reviewed in the light of the guarantees offered by the competent Indonesian authorities and on the basis of the results of the tests carried out by Member States.
To odločbo je treba pregledati ob upoštevanju zagotovil pristojnih organov Indonezije in na podlagi rezultatov preskusov, ki jih opravijo države članice.
This Decision shall apply to fishery products imported from Indonesia and intended for human consumption.
Ta odločba velja za ribiške proizvode, uvožene iz Indonezije in namenjene za prehrano ljudi.
Tests
Preskusi
Member States shall, using appropriate sampling plans and detection methods, ensure that each consignment of products covered by Article 1 undergoes necessary tests to make sure that the products concerned do not exceed the maximum levels laid down in Regulation (EC) 466/2001 for heavy metals;
Države članice uporabljajo ustrezne načrte vzorčenja in metode odkrivanja za zagotavljanje, da so proizvodi, navedeni v členu 1, iz vsake pošiljke, obvezno preskušeni, in za zagotavljanje, da zadevni proizvodi ne presegajo mejnih vrednosti za težke kovine, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 466/2001;
Furthermore, in the case of the species belonging to the families scombridae, clupeidae, engraulidae and coryphaenidae, a test to detect the presence of histamine must be done to be sure that the levels remain below those established by Directive 91/493.
Pri vrstah iz družin scombridae, clupeidae, engraulidae in coryphaenidae mora biti poleg tega opravljen preskus za odkrivanje prisotnosti histamina zaradi zagotovitve, da vrednosti ne presegajo mejnih vrednosti, določenih z Direktivo 91/493/EGS.
Member States shall submit to the Commission every three months a report of all analytical results of official controls on consignments of products covered by paragraph 1.
Države članice Komisiji vsake tri mesece predložijo poročilo o vseh rezultatih analiz uradnega nadzora nad pošiljkami proizvodov, zajetih v odstavku 1.
Unfavourable test results
Neugodni rezultati preskusov
Member States shall not authorise imports into their territory or consignments to another Member State of products as referred to in Article 1 that are found to exceed maximum levels in the tests referred to in Article 2(1).
Države članice ne dovolijo uvoza na svoje ozemlje ali pošiljanja proizvodov iz člena 1, za katere so s preskusi iz člena 2(1) ugotovljene presežene vrednosti, v drugo državo članico.
Member States shall immediately inform the Commission of the measures they take to comply with this Decision.
Države članice Komisijo nemudoma obvestijo o sprejetih ukrepih, potrebnih za uskladitev s to določbo.
This Decision shall be reviewed on the basis of the guarantees provided by the competent Indonesian authorities and on the basis of the results of the tests referred to in Article 2.
Ta odločba se ponovno pregleda na podlagi jamstev, ki jih zagotovijo pristojni organi Indonezije, ter rezultatov preskusov iz člena 2.
Done at Brussels, 21 March 2006.
V Bruslju, 21. marca 2006
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 882/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1642/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 4).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1642/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 245, 29.9.2003, str. 4).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 199/2006 (OJ L 32, 4.2.2006, p. 34).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 199/2006 (UL L 32, 4.2.2006, str. 34).
on the aid measures implemented by the Netherlands for AVR for dealing with hazardous waste
o ukrepih pomoči, ki jih izvaja Nizozemska za podjetje AVR za ravnanje z nevarnimi odpadki
(notified under document number C(2005) 1789)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 1789)
(Only the Dutch version is authentic)
(Besedilo v nizozemskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1] in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
The bulk of the aid was for the incineration of such waste in two rotating drum furnaces (‘RDFs’).
Večji del pomoči je bil namenjen sežiganju takih odpadkov v dveh pečeh z vrtečim bobnom (rotating drum furnace, „RDF“).
The Netherlands invoked Article 86(2) of the Treaty and asked the Commission to decide that the measure does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty since it represents appropriate compensation for the obligation to provide a service of general economic interest (‘SGEI’) within the meaning of Article 86(2) of the Treaty.
Nizozemska se je sklicevala na člen 86(2) Pogodbe in zaprosila Komisijo, da odloči, da ukrep ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe, saj je ustrezno nadomestilo za obveznost zagotavljanja storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena v smislu člena 86(2) Pogodbe.
The case was registered under No N 43/2003.
Zadeva je vpisana v evidenco pod številko N 43/2003.
The Commission requested additional information by letters of 7 February 2003 (D/50847) and 22 April 2003 (D/52566).
Komisija je zaprosila za dodatne informacije z dopisoma z dne 7. februarja 2003 (D/50847) in 22. aprila 2003 (D/52566).
The Netherlands submitted that information by letters of 24 March 2003 (registered as received on 28 March 2003 under No A/32279) and 19 June 2003 (registered as received on 25 June under No A/34394).
Nizozemska je te informacije predložila z dopisoma z dne 24. marca 2003 (evidentiranim 28. marca 2003 pod številko A/32279) in 19. junija 2003 (evidentiranim 25. junija pod številko A/34394).
Representatives of the Netherlands and of the Commission met on 21 May 2003.
Predstavniki Nizozemske in Komisije so se sestali 21. maja 2003.
Two competitors submitted a joint complaint on the aid by letter of 2 May 2003 (registered as received on 5 May under No A/33155).
Dva konkurenta sta vložila skupno pritožbo glede pomoči z dopisom z dne 2. maja 2003 (evidentiranim 5. maja pod številko A/33155).
By letter of 20 May 2003 (registered as received the same day under No A/33548), they informed the Commission that a subsidiary of one of them supported the complaint as well.
Z dopisom z dne 20. maja 2003 (evidentiranim istega dne pod številko A/33548) sta Komisijo obvestila, da hčerinsko podjetje enega od njiju prav tako podpira pritožbo.
By decision C(2003)1763 of 24 June 2003, the Commission initiated the Article 88(2) procedure in respect of the notified measure.
Komisija je s sklepom C(2003)1763 z dne 24. junija 2003 sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) glede prijavljenega ukrepa.
The case was registered as aid measure No C 43/2003.
Zadeva je bila evidentirana kot ukrep pomoči št. C 43/2003.
This decision was sent to the Netherlands by letter of 26 June 2003 (D/230250).
Sklep je bil poslan Nizozemski z dopisom z dne 26. junija 2003 (D/230250).
It was published in the Official Journal of the European Union dated 20 August 2003 [2].
Objavljen je bil v Uradnem listu Evropske unije20. avgusta 2003.
The Commission received comments from four interested parties (registered under Nos A/36309, A/36463, A/36645, A/36679, A/36870, A/37077, A/37480 and A/37569), including from the two competitors that had submitted the complaint in May, also on behalf of another company belonging to the group to which one of the two original competitors belongs (hereinafter these four entities together are referred to as ‘the two joint competitors’).
Komisija je prejela pripombe od štirih zainteresiranih strank (evidentirane pod številkami A/36309, A/36463, A/36645, A/36679, A/36870, A/37077, A/37480 in A/37569), vključno z dvema konkurentoma, ki sta vložila pritožbo maja, in sicer tudi v imenu drugega podjetja, ki sodi v skupino, kateri pripada eden od dveh prvotnih konkurentov (v nadaljevanju se ti štirje subjekti skupaj imenujejo „dva združena konkurenta“).
The Commission forwarded these comments to the Netherlands by letters of 1 October 2003 (D/56129), 29 October 2003 (D/56898), 7 November 2003 (D/57120) and 12 November 2003 (D/57185).
Komisija je te pripombe poslala Nizozemski z dopisi z dne 1. oktobra 2003 (D/56129), 29. oktobra 2003 (D/56898), 7. novembra 2003 (D/57120) in 12. novembra 2003 (D/57185).
These letters also contained some further questions from the Commission.
Ti dopisi so vsebovali tudi nekaj nadaljnjih vprašanj Komisije.
By letter of 13 August 2003 (registered as received on 14 August 2003 under No A/35706), the two joint competitors informed the Commission that part of the aid had been paid to AVR Nuts and they asked the Commission to take an injunction decision to suspend further payments and a decision ordering the Netherlands to provisionally recover the aid pursuant to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [3].
Z dopisom z dne 13. avgusta 2003 (evidentiranim 14. avgusta 2003 pod številko A/35706) sta dva združena konkurenta obvestila Komisijo, da je bil del pomoči plačan podjetju AVR Nuts, in jo prosila, da sprejme odločitev o začasnem odlogu nadaljnjih plačil in odločbo, s katero Nizozemski odredi, da začasno povrne pomoč v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES.
As requested by the Commission on 20 August 2003 (D/55321), the Netherlands confirmed by letter of 25 September 2003 (registered as received on 30 September under No A/36690) that, as regards 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, the notified aid had been paid to AVR Nuts.
Na podlagi prošnje Komisije z dne 20. avgusta 2003 (D/55321) je Nizozemska z dopisom z dne 25. septembra 2003 (evidentiranim 30. septembra pod številko A/36690) potrdila, da je bila prijavljena pomoč plačana podjetju AVR Nuts za leto 2002 in prvo četrtletje leta 2003.
By letter of 20 October 2003 (D/56735), the Commission informed the two joint competitors that it did not intend to take the decisions requested.
Z dopisom z dne 20. oktobra 2003 (D/56735) je Komisija obvestila združena konkurenta, da ne namerava sprejeti odločb, za kateri sta jo zaprosila.
The two joint competitors restated their request by letters of 14 November 2003 (registered as received on 17 November under No A/37909) and of 1 December 2003 (registered as received on 2 December under No A/38325).
Združena konkurenta sta na novo predložila svojo zahtevo z dopisoma z dne 14. novembra 2003 (evidentiran 17. novembra pod številko A/37909) in 1. decembra 2003 (evidentiran 2. decembra pod številko A/38325).
The letter of 1 December and the Commission’s reply of 24 November 2003 (D/57541) confirming its position actually crossed in the post.
Dopis z dne 1. decembra in odgovor Komisije z dne 24. novembra 2003 (D/57541), s katerim ta potrjuje svoje stališče, sta se dejansko srečala med pošiljanjem.
After requesting an extension (letter of 14 July 2003, registered as received on 18 July under No A/35109 and letter of 29 October 2003, registered as received on 5 November under No A/37568) that was granted by letter of 23 July 2003 (D/54737), the Netherlands commented on the Commission’s decision by letter of 18 December 2003 (registered as received on 8 January 2004 under No A/30088).
Nizozemska je, potem ko je zaprosila za podaljšanje (dopis z dne 14. julija 2003, evidentiran 18. julija pod številko A/35109, in dopis z dne 29. oktobra 2003, evidentiran 5. novembra pod številko A/37568), ki je bilo odobreno z dopisom z dne 23. julija 2003 (D/54737), dala pripombe na odločbo Komisije z dopisom z dne 18. decembra 2003 (evidentiranim 8. januarja 2004 pod številko A/30088).
It gave its observations on the comments from interested parties by letters of 23 December 2003 (registered as received on 8 January 2004 under No A/30090), 23 January 2004 (registered as received on 29 January under No A/30621), 25 February 2004 (registered as received on 27 February under No A/31451) and 23 April 2004 (registered as received on 30 April under No A/33118).
Navedla je svoja stališča glede pripomb zainteresiranih strank z dopisi z dne 23. decembra 2003 (evidentiran 8. januarja 2004 pod številko A/30090), 23. januarja 2004 (evidentiran 29. januarja pod številko A/30621), 25. februarja 2004 (evidentiran 27. februarja pod številko A/31451) in 23. aprila 2004 (evidentiran 30 aprila pod številko A/33118).
By means of the last two letters, the Netherlands also informed the Commission of ongoing developments at AVR Nuts.
Z zadnjima dvema dopisoma je Nizozemska tudi obvestila Komisijo o trenutnem razvoju dogodkov v AVR Nuts.
Since the mounting deficits would require increasing amounts of aid, it was decided to close one of the two RDFs with effect from 1 July 2004.
Ker bi bili zaradi naraščajočega primanjkljaja potrebni vse večji zneski pomoči, je bilo sklenjeno, da se ena od dveh peči RDF zapre z začetkom veljavnosti od 1. julija 2004.
Closure of the second RDF was still under consideration.
Zaprtje druge peči RDF se je še obravnavalo.
It transpired that the original aid contract contained provisions to the effect that the Netherlands would grant some compensation for the costs of closure.
Izkazalo se je, da je originalna pogodba o pomoči vsebovala določbe, v skladu s katerimi naj bi Nizozemska dodelila določeno nadomestilo za stroške zaprtja.
In view of the new information, the Commission adopted on 14 July 2004 decision C(2004) 2640 fin extending the Article 88(2) procedure to the compensation for the costs of the (possible) closure of the RDFs.
Glede na nove informacije je Komisija 14. julija 2004 sprejela odločbo C(2004)2640 konč., s katero je razširila postopek iz člena 88(2) na nadomestilo za stroške (možnega) zaprtja peči RDF.
On 16 July this decision was sent to the Netherlands, which asked for an extension of the deadline for comments and for a meeting to be convened to discuss the ongoing developments (letter of 30 July 2003, registered as received on 4 August under A/35996).
Ta odločba je bila 16. julija poslana Nizozemski, ki je zaprosila za podaljšanje roka za pripombe in za sestanek, na katerem naj bi razpravljali o trenutnem razvoju dogodkov (dopis z dne 30. julija 2003, evidentiran 4. avgusta pod številko A/35996).
A meeting between representatives of the Netherlands and of the Commission took place on 23 August 2004.
Predstavniki Nizozemske in Komisije so se sestali 23. avgusta 2004.
Another meeting between representatives of the Commission and of the two joint competitors took place on 26 August 2004.
Predstavniki Komisije in dveh združenih konkurentov so se sestali na drugem sestanku dne 26. avgusta 2004.
For the rest, the law firm represented yet another competitor.
Kar zadeva ostale, je odvetniška družba zastopala še enega konkurenta.
The Netherlands commented on the Commission’s decision by letter of 10 September 2004 (registered as received on 17 September under No A/36999).
Nizozemska je dala pripombe na odločbo Komisije z dopisom z dne 10. septembra 2004 (evidentiranim 17. septembra pod številko A/36999).