natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
for applying Articles 4(7) and 5(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 565/80.
pri uporabi člena 4(7) in člena 5(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 565/80.
Regulation (EEC) No 109/80 is repealed.
Uredba (EGS) št. 109/80 se razveljavi.
OJ L 14, 19.1.1980, p. 30.
UL L 14, 19.1.1980, str. 30.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2916/95 (OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2916/95 (UL L 305, 19.12.1995, str. 49).
REPEALED REGULATION WITH ITS SUCCESSIVE AMENDMENTS
RAZVELJAVLJENA UREDBA Z NJENIMI ZAPOREDNIMI SPREMEMBAMI
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 109/80
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 109/80
(OJ L 14, 19.1.1980, p. 30)
(UL L 14, 19.1.1980, str. 30)
Regulation (EEC) No 1475/80
Uredba (EGS) št. 1475/80
(OJ L 147, 13.6.1980, p. 15)
(UL L 147, 13.6.1980, str. 15)
Only the second indent of Article 1(3)
Samo druga alinea člena 1(3)
Regulation (EEC) No 3987/87
Uredba (EGS) št. 3987/87
(OJ L 376, 31.12.1987, p. 20)
(UL L 376, 31.12.1987, str. 20)
Only Article 4
Samo člen 4
Regulation (EEC) No 1737/90
Uredba (EGS) št. 1737/90
(OJ L 161, 27.6.1990, p. 25)
(UL L 161, 27.6.1990, str. 25)
Regulation (EEC) No 3779/90
Uredba (EGS) št. 3779/90
(OJ L 364, 28.12.1990, p. 9)
(UL L 364, 28.12.1990, str. 9)
Regulation (EC) No 2916/95
Uredba (ES) št. 2916/95
(OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49)
(UL L 305, 19.12.1995, str. 49)
Only the second indent of Article 1(1) and the first indent of Article 1(2)
Samo druga alinea člena 1(1) in prva alinea člena 1(2)
Regulation (EEC) No 109/80
Uredba (EGS) št. 109/80
Council Regulation (EC) No 1650/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1650/2006
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 on imports of coumarin originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of coumarin consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or Malaysia or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002 o uvozu kumarina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali Malezije ali ne
Following an expiry review, by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 [2] (the original Regulation), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of EUR 3479 per tonne on imports of coumarin, falling within CN code ex29322100 originating in the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 3479 EUR/tono na uvoz kumarina, uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex29322100, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
In December 2004, after circumvention practices via India and Thailand were found, the measures were extended by Regulation (EC) No 2272/2004 [3] to imports of coumarin consigned from India or Thailand, whether declared as originating in India or Thailand or not.
Decembra 2004, potem ko je bilo ugotovljeno izogibanje preko Indije in Tajske, so bili ukrepi z Uredbo (ES) št. 2272/2004 [3] razširjeni na uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indije ali Tajske, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indije oziroma Tajske ali ne.
On 13 February 2006, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC (the request).
Komisija je 13. februarja 2006 v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe prejela zahtevek za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim na uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK („zahtevek“).
The request was submitted by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) (the applicant) on behalf of the sole producer in the Community.
Zahtevek je vložil Svet evropske kemične industrije (CEFIC) („vložnik“) v imenu edinega proizvajalca v Skupnosti.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence that there had been a change in the pattern of trade following the imposition of the existing anti-dumping measures and anti-circumvention measures on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC, as shown by a significant increase in imports of the same product from Indonesia and Malaysia.
Zahtevek je vseboval dovolj prima facie dokazov, da se je vzorec trgovanja po uvedbi obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov in ukrepov proti izogibanju za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK spremenil, kar je bilo razvidno iz znatnega povečanja uvoza enakega proizvoda iz Indonezije in Malezije.
This change in the pattern of trade was alleged to stem from the transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via Indonesia and Malaysia.
Ta sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja je domnevno izvirala iz pretovarjanja kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Indonezije in Malezije.
It was further alleged that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for these practices other than the existence of the anti-dumping measures on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC.
Trdilo se je tudi, da te prakse ni bilo mogoče ekonomsko upravičiti ali najti drugih zadostnih razlogov kot je obstoj protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK.
Finally, the applicant submitted evidence that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on coumarin originating in the PRC were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices.
Vložnik je tudi predložil dokaz, da so popravljalni učinki obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov za kumarin s poreklom iz LRK oslabljeni v smislu količin in cen.
Significant volumes of imports of coumarin from Indonesia and Malaysia appeared to have replaced imports of coumarin from the PRC.
Zdi se, da je znaten obseg uvoza kumarina iz Indonezije in Malezije nadomestil uvoz kumarina iz LRK.
In addition, there was sufficient evidence that the increase in imports was made at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the investigation that led to the existing measures, and that dumping was taking place in relation to the normal values previously established for coumarin originating in the PRC.
Poleg tega obstajajo zadostni dokazi, da so bile cene povečanega uvoza bistveno nižje od neškodljive cene, določene v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov, in da se je damping izvajal v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, ki so bile pred tem določene za kumarin s poreklom iz LRK.
The Commission initiated an investigation by Regulation (EC) No 499/2006 [4] (the initiating Regulation) into the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC by imports of coumarin consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or Malaysia or not and, pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, directed the customs authorities to register imports of coumarin consigned from Indonesia or Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or Malaysia or not, falling within CN code ex29322100 (TARIC code 2932210016).
Komisija je začela preiskavo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 499/2006 [4] („začetna uredba“) zaradi domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK, z uvažanjem kumarina, poslanega iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali Malezije ali ne, in v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe carinskim organom naročila, da registrirajo uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indonezije ali Malezije, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali Malezije ali ne, uvrščenega pod oznako KN ex29322100 (oznaka TARIC 2932210016).
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, Indonesia and Malaysia, the producers/exporters, the importers in the Community known to be concerned and the applicant of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno seznanila organe LRK, Indonezije in Malezije, proizvajalce/izvoznike, uvoznike v Skupnost, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter vložnika.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC as well as to the importers in the Community named in the request.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK ter uvoznikom v Skupnosti, navedenim v zahtevku.
There were no known producers in Indonesia and Malaysia.
V Indoneziji in Maleziji ni znanih proizvajalcev.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and findings being made on the basis of the facts available.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene, da lahko nesodelovanje povzroči uporabo člena 18 osnovne uredbe in privede do ugotovitev na osnovi razpoložljivih dejstev.
No producer or exporter in the PRC, Indonesia or Malaysia submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Noben proizvajalec ali izvoznik v LRK, Indoneziji ali Maleziji ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
Indonesian authorities replied that there was no producer of coumarin known in Indonesia.
Indonezijski organi so odgovorili, da v Indoneziji ni znanega proizvajalca kumarina.
The investigation period covered the period from 1 March 2005 to 28 February 2006 (IP).
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. marca 2005 do 28. februarja 2006 („OP“).
Data from 2002 up to the end of the investigation period were collected to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
Podatki so bili zbrani od leta 2002 do konca obdobja preiskave, da bi se preiskala domnevna sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja.
Indonesia and Malaysia
Indonezija in Malezija
No producers or exporters of coumarin in Indonesia and Malaysia made themselves known or cooperated in the investigation.
Noben proizvajalec ali izvoznik kumarina v Indoneziji ali Maleziji se ni javil ali sodeloval v preiskavi.
Accordingly, findings in respect of the exports of coumarin consigned from Indonesia and Malaysia to the Community had to be made on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba do ugotovitev o izvozu kumarina, poslanega iz Indonezije in Malezije v Skupnost, priti na osnovi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
At the outset of the investigation, the authorities of Indonesia and Malaysia had been informed of the consequences of non-cooperation, as set out in Article 18(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na začetku preiskave so bili indonezijski in malezijski organi obveščeni o posledicah nesodelovanja, določenih v členu 18(6) osnovne uredbe.
It was made clear to the known companies that non-cooperation may lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Znanim družbam je bilo pojasnjeno, da lahko nesodelovanje privede do uporabe člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
Product concerned and like product
Zadevni proizvod in podobni proizvod
The product concerned by the alleged circumvention is, as defined in the original Regulation, coumarin currently classifiable within CN code ex29322100.
Proizvod, ki ga zadeva domnevno izogibanje, je, kot je opredeljeno v prvotni uredbi, kumarin, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex29322100.
Coumarin is a whitish crystalline powder with the characteristic odour of newly mown hay.
Kumarin je belkast kristaliničen prah z značilnim vonjem svežega sena.
However, coumarin produced through these two processes has the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and has the same uses.
Vendar ima kumarin, proizveden po teh dveh postopkih, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti in se ga uporablja v iste namene.
In the absence of cooperation by parties in Indonesia or Malaysia, it must be inferred, on the basis of the information available and in the absence of any contrary evidence, that coumarin exported to the Community from the PRC and coumarin consigned from Indonesia and Malaysia have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and have the same uses.
Zaradi nesodelovanja strank v Indoneziji oziroma Maleziji in odsotnosti kakršnih koli nasprotujočih si dokazov je treba na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij skleniti, da imata kumarin, izvožen iz LRK v Skupnost in kumarin, poslan iz Indonezije in Malezije, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti in se uporabljata v iste namene.
They are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Torej veljata v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe za podobna proizvoda.
As stated above, the change in the pattern of the trade was alleged to stem from transhipment via Indonesia and Malaysia.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja domnevno izvira iz pretovarjanja preko Indonezije in Malezije.
As no Indonesian company cooperated in the investigation, exports from Indonesia to the Community had to be established on the basis of the facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker nobena indonezijska družba ni sodelovala v preiskavi, je bilo treba izvoz iz Indonezije v Skupnost določiti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Eurostat data, the most appropriate information available, were therefore used to establish the export prices and quantities of imports from Indonesia.
S podatki Eurostata, najustreznejšimi razpoložljivimi informacijami, so bile določene izvozne cene in količine uvoza iz Indonezije.
Significant imports from Indonesia into the Community started immediately after the initiation of the previous anti-circumvention investigation against India and Thailand, at the level of 12,5 tonnes in 2004, 15 tonnes in 2005 and 10 tonnes in the investigation period (representing 1,7 % of the EU consumption).
Znaten uvoz iz Indonezije v Skupnost se je začel izvajati takoj po uvedbi prejšnje preiskave proti izogibanju proti Indiji in Tajski na stopnji 12,5 ton leta 2004, 15 ton leta 2005 in 10 ton v obdobju preiskave (kar pomeni 1,7 % potrošnje EU).
In parallel, Chinese exports into Indonesia have developed from 57 tonnes in 2003 to 83,8 tonnes in the investigation period.
Hkrati se je kitajski izvoz v Indonezijo povečal s 57 ton leta 2003 na 83,8 ton v obdobju preiskave.
In the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Indonesia and the Community from 2004 to the end of the investigation period, which stemmed from transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via Indonesia.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in pomanjkanja nasprotnih dokazov se sklene, da se je od leta 2004 do konca obdobja preiskave spremenil vzorec trgovanja med LRK, Indonezijo in Skupnostjo, vzrok za to spremembo pa je pretovarjanje kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Indonezije.
As no Malaysian company cooperated in the investigation, exports from Malaysia to the Community had to be established on the basis of the facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker nobena malezijska družba ni sodelovala v preiskavi, je bilo treba izvoz iz Malezije v Skupnost določiti na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Eurostat data, the most appropriate information available, were therefore used to establish the export prices and quantities of imports from Malaysia.
S podatki Eurostata, najustreznejšimi razpoložljivimi informacijami, so bile določene izvozne cene in količine uvoza iz Malezije.
Imports from Malaysia into the Community started in 2005, reaching a level of 13 tonnes in 2005 and 23 tonnes in the investigation period (representing 3,9 % of the EU consumption).
Malezija je začela v Skupnost uvažati leta 2005 in tega leta dosegla raven 13 ton ter 23 ton v obdobju preiskave (kar pomeni 3,9 % potrošnje EU).
At the same time, the Chinese exports into Malaysia have grown from 23,6 tonnes in 2004 to 43,76 tonnes in the investigation period.
Hkrati se je kitajski izvoz v Malezijo povečal s 23,6 ton leta 2004 na 43,76 ton v obdobju preiskave.
In the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Malaysia and the Community from 2005 to the end of the investigation period, which stemmed from transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via Malaysia.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in pomanjkanja nasprotnih dokazov se sklene, da se je od leta 2005 do konca obdobja preiskave spremenil vzorec trgovanja med LRK, Malezijo in Skupnostjo, vzrok za to spremembo pa je pretovarjanje kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Malezije.
In the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that, given that significant imports started immediately after the initiation of the previous anti-circumvention investigation against India and Thailand, in parallel with an increase of Chinese exports of coumarin to Indonesia, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the existence of the anti-dumping measures rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in ker niso bili predloženi kakršni koli nasprotni dokazi, se, glede na to, da se je začel znaten uvoz izvajati takoj po uvedbi prejšnje preiskave proti izogibanju proti Indiji in Tajski, istočasno s povečanjem kitajskega izvoza kumarina v Indonezijo, sklene, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročil obstoj protidampinških ukrepov, ne pa kateri koli drugi upravičen razlog ali ekonomska upravičenost v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect, it is also noted that there is no evidence of genuine production of coumarin in Indonesia.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti tudi, da ni dokazov o dejanski proizvodnji kumarina v Indoneziji.
In the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that, given that the imports started in 2005, after the extension of the measures on imports of coumarin consigned from India or Thailand and that, in parallel, the Chinese exports into Malaysia have grown from 23,6 tonnes in 2004 to 43,76 tonnes in 2005, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the existence of the anti-dumping measures rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in ker niso bili predloženi kakršni koli nasprotni dokazi, se, glede na to, da se je začel uvoz izvajati leta 2005, po razširitvi ukrepov na uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indije ali Tajske, in se je istočasno kitajski izvoz kumarina v Malezijo povečal s 23,6 ton leta 2004 na 43,76 ton leta 2005, sklene, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročil obstoj protidampinških ukrepov, ne pa kateri koli drugi upravičen razlog ali ekonomska upravičenost v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect, it is also noted that there is no evidence of genuine production of coumarin in Malaysia.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti tudi, da ni dokazov o dejanski proizvodnji kumarina v Maleziji.
Undermining of the remedial effects of the duty in terms of the prices and/or the quantities of the like products
Razvrednotenje popravljalnih učinkov dajatve v smislu cen in/ali količin podobnih proizvodov
Based on the trade flow analysis made above, it was found that a change in the pattern of the Community imports is linked to the fact that there were anti-dumping and anti-circumvention measures in place.
Na podlagi zgornje analize trgovinskih tokov je bilo ugotovljeno, da je sprememba v vzorcu uvoza v Skupnost povezana z dejstvom, da so obstajali protidampinški ukrepi in ukrepi proti izogibanju.
While imports declared as originating in Indonesia were absent on the Community market until 2003, they amounted to 4 tonnes in 2003, to 12,5 tonnes in 2004, to 15 tonnes in 2005 and to 10 tonnes in the investigation period, representing 1,7 % of Community consumption.
Medtem ko se uvoz, prijavljen kot s poreklom iz Indonezije, na trg Skupnosti do leta 2003 ni izvajal, je znašal leta 2003 4 tone, leta 2004 12,5 ton, leta 2005 15 ton in v obdobju preiskave 10 ton, kar pomeni 1,7 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
The investigation revealed that the imports from Indonesia have taken place at price levels below the export price in the original investigation and well below the original normal value.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je uvoz iz Indonezije izvajal po ravneh cene, ki je bila v obdobju preiskave pod izvozno ceno ter pod prvotno normalno vrednostjo.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that the change in trade flows, together with the abnormally low prices of exports from Indonesia have undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures both in terms of quantities and prices of the like products.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da je sprememba trgovinskih tokov skupaj z neobičajno nizkimi cenami izvoza iz Indonezije oslabila popravljalni učinek protidampinških ukrepov v smislu količin in cen podobnih proizvodov.
Based on the trade flow analysis made above, it was found that a change in the pattern of trade is linked to the fact that there were anti-dumping and anti-circumvention measures in place.
Na podlagi zgornje analize trgovinskih tokov je bilo ugotovljeno, da je sprememba v vzorcu uvoza v Skupnost povezana z dejstvom, da so obstajali protidampinški ukrepi in ukrepi proti izogibanju.
While there were no imports of coumarin into the Community before 2005, they amounted to 13 tonnes in 2005 and to 23 tonnes in the investigation period.
Medtem ko se pred letom 2005 kumarin v Skupnost ni uvažal, je uvoz leta 2005 znašal 13 ton, v obdobju preiskave pa 23 ton.
The investigation revealed that the imports from Malaysia have taken place at price levels below the export price in the original investigation and well below the original normal value.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je uvoz iz Malezije izvajal po ravneh cene, ki je bila v obdobju preiskave pod izvozno ceno ter pod prvotno normalno vrednostjo.
On the basis of the above, it is concluded that the change in trade flows, together with the abnormally low prices of exports from Malaysia have undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures both in terms of quantities and prices of the like products.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se sklene, da je sprememba trgovinskih tokov skupaj z neobičajno nizkimi cenami izvoza iz Malezije oslabila popravljalni učinek protidampinških ukrepov v smislu količin in cen podobnih proizvodov.
Evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for like or similar products
Dokazi o dampingu v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, ki so bile pred tem določene za podobne ali sorodne proizvode
In order to determine whether evidence of dumping could be found with respect to the exports of coumarin from Indonesia to the Community during the IP, Eurostat data were used pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Da bi ugotovili, ali je mogoče najti dokaze za damping v zvezi z zadevnim izvozom kumarina iz Indonezije v Skupnost v OP, so bili uporabljeni podatki Eurostata v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation requires evidence of dumping in relation to the normal value previously established for the like or similar products.
Člen 13(1) osnovne uredbe zahteva dokaz o dampingu glede na predhodno ugotovljeno normalno vrednost za podobne ali sorodne proizvode.
For the purpose of a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance, in the form of adjustments, was made for differences which affect prices and price comparability.
Zaradi poštene primerjave so bile med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno narejene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike, ki vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
These adjustments were made in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation in respect of transport and insurance, on the basis of the facts available, i.e. as given in the request, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Te prilagoditve so bile v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe narejene v zvezi s prevozom in zavarovanjem na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev, tj. kot so navedena v zahtevku, v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.