natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to all other companies.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom v izvedbenem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti in za njih velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company countervailing and anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [9] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities,
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj izravnalnih in protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [9], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezani s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov –
Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty for imports produced in India by the companies listed below, shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, ki jih v Indiji proizvajajo družbe, navedene v nadaljevanju, je:
Flex Industries Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (UP), India
Flex Industries Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (U.P.), Indija
Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1676/2001 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, shall be as follows for products originating in:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke s poreklom iz, je:
Ester Industries Limited, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part-1, New Delhi 110 003, India
Ester Industries Limited, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part-1, New Delhi 110 003, Indija
Korea
Južna Koreja
KP Chemical Corporation, No 89-4, Kyungun-Dong, Chongro-Ku, Seoul, Korea
89-4, Kyungun-Dong, Chongro-Ku, Seoul, Koreja
OJ L 68, 8.3.2006, p. 15.
UL L 68, 8.3.2006, str. 15.
OJ L 68, 8.3.2006, p. 6.
UL L 68, 8.3.2006, str. 6.
OJ C 172, 12.7.2005, p. 5.
UL C 172, 12.7.2005, str. 5.
Notification No 1/2002-07 of 31.3.2002 of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the Government of India.
Uradno obvestilo št. 1/2002–2007 z dne 31.3.2002 Ministrstva za trgovino in industrijo indijske vlade.
Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 057, India
Garware Polyester Limited, Garware House, 50-A, Swami Nityanand Marg, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai 400 057, Indija
India Polyfilms Limited, 112 Indra Prakash Building, 21 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
India Polyfilms Limited, 112 Indra Prakash Building, 21 Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001, Indija
Jindal Poly Films Limited, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
Jindal Poly Films Limited, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, Indija
MTZ Polyfilms Limited, New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400 039, India
MTZ Polyfilms Limited, New India Centre, 5th Floor, 17 Co-operage Road, Mumbai 400 039, Indija
Flex Industries Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (U.P.), India
Flex Industries Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (U.P.), Indija
Kolon Industries Inc., Kolon Tower, 1-23, Byulyang-dong, Kwacheon-city, Kyunggi-do, Korea
Kolon Industries Inc., Kolon Tower, 1-23, Byulyang-dong, Kwacheon-city, Kyunggi-do, Koreja
SKC Co. Ltd, Kyobo Gangnam Tower, 1303-22, Seocho 4 Dong, Seocho Gu, Seoul 137-074, Korea
SKC Co. Ltd, Kyobo Gangnam Tower, 1303-22, Seocho 4 Dong, Seocho Gu, Seoul 137-074, Koreja
Toray Saehan Inc. 17F, LG Mapo B/D, 275 Kongdug-Dong, Mapo-Gu, Seoul 121-721, Korea
Toray Saehan Inc. 17F, LG Mapo B/D, 275 Kongdug-Dong, Mapo-Gu, Seoul 121-721, Koreja
HS Industries Co. Ltd, Kangnam Building 5th Floor, 1321, Seocho-Dong, Seocho-Ku, Seoul, Korea
HS Industries Co. Ltd, Kangnam Building 5th Floor, 1321, Seocho-Dong, Seocho-Ku, Seoul, Koreja
Hyosung Corporation, 450, Kongduk-Dong, Mapo-Ku, Seoul, Korea
Hyosung Corporation, 450, Kongduk-Dong, Mapo-Ku, Seoul, Koreja
Garware
Družba Garware
The numerator was established as follows: the subsidy amount was calculated, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of unpaid customs duty on imported capital goods spread over a period which reflects the normal depreciation period of such capital goods in the PET film industry. Interest was added to this amount in order to reflect the full value of the benefit over time.
Števec je bil izračunan na naslednji način: znesek subvencije je bil izračunan v skladu s členom 7(3) osnovne uredbe na podlagi neplačanih carin na uvoženo investicijsko blago v obdobju, ki odraža običajno amortizacijsko dobo takšnega investicijskega blaga v industriji folije iz PET. Temu znesku so bile dodane obresti, da bi se upoštevala polna vrednost ugodnosti v določenem času.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1289/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1289/2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain side-by-side refrigerators originating in the Republic of Korea
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz nekaterih ameriških hladilnikov s poreklom iz Republike Koreje
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’) and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
On 2 June 2005, the Commission published a notice [2] initiating an anti-dumping proceeding on imports into the Community of certain side-by-side refrigerators originating in the Republic of Korea.
Komisija je 2. junija 2005 objavila obvestilo [2], s katerim je uvedla protidampinški postopek glede uvoza nekaterih ameriških hladilnikov s poreklom iz Republike Koreje v Skupnost.
On 1 March 2006, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 355/2006 [3] (‘the provisional Regulation’) imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on the same product.
Komisija je 1. marca 2006 z Uredbo (ES) št. 355/2006 [3] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na isti izdelek.
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was decided to impose provisional anti-dumping measures, several interested parties made written submissions making their views known on the provisional findings.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta uvedba začasnih protidampinških ukrepov, je več zainteresiranih strank predložilo pisna stališča v zvezi z začasnimi ugotovitvami.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain side-by-side refrigerators originating in the Republic of Korea and the definitive collection of the amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz nekaterih ameriških hladilnikov s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
They were also granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which definitive measures are imposed.
Po razkritju bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih so bili uvedeni dokončni ukrepi, je bil določen tudi rok za predložitev stališč.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Po preučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
The same exporting producer as referred to under recitals 11 and 12 of the provisional Regulation reiterated and elaborated further its arguments on the issue of the product scope.
Proizvajalec izvoznik, ki je naveden tudi v uvodnih izjavah 11 in 12 začasne uredbe, je ponovno poudaril in podrobneje pojasnil svojo utemeljitev glede obsega izdelka.
In particular, this exporter claimed that the product scope should have covered all large capacity combined refrigerator-freezers (‘CRF’) with a capacity above 400 litres since a segmentation of those refrigerators would be inconsistent with the past practice of the Community institutions, would disregard evidence from other interested parties and would ignore market reality (claim (i)).
Ta izvoznik je zlasti trdil, da bi moral obseg izdelka zajeti vse modele z veliko prostornino, ki so kombinacija hladilnika in zamrzovalnika („KHZ“), s prostornino nad 400 litrov, saj delitev teh hladilnikov ne bi bila skladna s preteklo prakso institucij Skupnosti, upoštevali pa se ne bi niti dokazi zainteresiranih strank niti tržna stvarnost (zahtevek (i)).
This exporter further claimed that should claim (i) be rejected, any attempt to segment the CRF market should exclude three-door side-by-side models (as described in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation) from the scope of the product concerned.
Ta izvoznik je tudi trdil, da bi v primeru zavrnitve zahtevka (i) vsakršen poskus delitve trga KHZ povzročil izključitev ameriških hladilnikov s troje vrati (kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe) iz obsega izdelka.
In essence, this exporter argued that it is not the external characteristics (notably the doors) of the models which are relevant, but the internal configuration.
Ta izvoznik je trdil, da v bistvu niso pomembne zunanje lastnosti teh modelov (npr. vrata), ampak notranja postavitev.
In particular, the exporter considered that the alignment of the fresh food and freezer compartments was the essential basic distinguishing characteristic of a side-by-side refrigerator (claim (ii)).
Izvoznik je zlasti menil, da je vzporedna namestitev hladilnega predelka in zamrzovalnega predelka bistvena osnovna razpoznavna lastnost ameriškega hladilnika (zahtevek (iii)).
Claim (i)
Zahtevek (i)
It is the standing practice of the Community institutions when defining the product concerned to consider primarily the basic physical and technical characteristics of the said product.
Ustaljena praksa institucij Skupnosti pri opredelitvi zadevnega izdelka je, da se upoštevajo predvsem osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti zadevnega izdelka.
Furthermore, models classified in different product segments are usually considered to form one single product unless clear dividing lines exist between the various segments.
Modele, uvrščene v različne segmente izdelkov, se običajno šteje za en sam izdelek, razen če so različni segmenti med seboj jasno ločeni.
Having paid careful attention to all the submissions made by all the interested parties to this proceeding, the investigation has identified that the CRF market is traditionally divided into three segments: the segment of the bottom-mount refrigerators (i.e. fresh-food compartment placed on top of the freezer compartment), the segment of the top-mount refrigerators (i.e. freezer compartment placed on top of the fresh-food compartment) and the segment of the side-by-side refrigerators (i.e. two doors side-by-side opening on two compartments placed side-by-side).
Ob natančnem upoštevanju vseh ugotovitev vseh zainteresiranih strank v tem postopku je preiskava pokazala, da je trg KHZ tradicionalno razdeljen na tri segmente: segment hladilnikov z zamrzovalnikom spodaj (tj. predelek za hlajenje nameščen nad predelkom za zamrzovanje), segment hladilnikov z zamrzovalnikom zgoraj (tj. predelek za zamrzovanje nameščen nad predelkom za hlajenje) in segment ameriških hladilnikov (tj. dvoje vzporednih vrat na dveh vzporedno nameščenih predelkih).
This market categorisation into three distinct segments is undisputed and is familiar to all operators in this particular business.
Ta tržna razvrstitev na tri različne segmente je nesporna in je poznana vsem gospodarskim subjektom v tem poslu.
It has even been acknowledged by the said exporter in several written submissions.
To je potrdil tudi imenovani izvoznik v več pisnih stališčih.
Furthermore, the claim based on the ‘evidence from other interested parties’ reflects in fact selective reading by this exporter of a fragment of a submission from a white goods producer that supports measures but does not manufacture the like product (see recitals 10 and 104 of the provisional Regulation).
Poleg tega je iz zahtevka na podlagi „dokazov drugih zainteresiranih strank“ razvidno, da se izvoznik zgolj delno sklicuje na stališče proizvajalca bele tehnike, ki sicer podpira ukrepe, ampak sam ne izdeluje enakega izdelka (glej uvodni izjavi 10 in 104 začasne uredbe).
In this submission, the manufacturer of white goods indicates that it has faced negative knock-on effects on its sales of non-like products in the Community due to dumped imports.
V tej trditvi proizvajalec bele tehnike navaja, da je imel dampinški uvoz škodljiv učinek na njegovo prodajo drugih izdelkov v Skupnosti.
However, the fact that this manufacturer has allegedly suffered such a knock-on effect is not in itself conclusive evidence that all large capacity CRFs with a capacity above 400 litres should be considered to be the product concerned regardless of the segments as described above into which they fall.
Vendar domnevni škodljivi učinek pri navedenem proizvajalcu sam po sebi ni trden dokaz, da je treba KHZ z veliko prostornino, s prostornino nad 400 litrov, šteti za zadevni izdelek ne glede na to, v katerega od zgoraj opisanih segmentov spadajo.
Indeed, it was established that the technological and physical characteristics underlying these two products are totally different.
Pravzaprav je bilo ugotovljeno, da imata popolnoma različne tehnične in fizikalne značilnosti.
It is therefore considered that there exists a clear dividing line between the three segments constituting the universe of the CRF market.
Zato se šteje, da obstaja jasna ločnica med temi tremi segmenti, ki sestavljajo skupni trg KHZ.
It is concluded that there is no justification for expanding the scope of the product concerned in order to encompass all CRFs as requested by the exporter concerned.
Sklene se, da razširitev obsega zadevnega izdelka, da bi zajel vse KHZ, kot je zahteval zadevni izvoznik, ni utemeljena.
As a consequence, claim (i) had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba zahtevek (i) zavrniti.
Claim (ii)
Zahtevek (ii)
In claim (ii), the same exporter seeks the exclusion from the scope of the product concerned of a particular model of CRF (hereafter referred to as ‘the three-door model’) which has already been described in recital 12 of the provisional Regulation.
V zahtevku (ii) je isti izvoznik zahteval, da se iz obsega zadevnega izdelka izključi posebni model KHZ (v nadaljevanju „model s troje vrati“), ki je opisan v uvodni izjavi 12 začasne uredbe.
Since the start of this proceeding, the Commission had defined the scope of the product on the basis of external characteristics, namely the presence of at least two separate swing doors, placed side-by-side.
Komisija je že na začetka tega postopka opredelila obseg izdelka na podlagi zunanjih značilnosti, namreč najmanj dvoje ločenih nihajnih vrat, ki so nameščena vzporedno.
This approach was deemed appropriate on both grounds of physical characteristics and consumer perception.
Ta pristop se je zdel primeren tako glede na fizikalne lastnosti kot na dojemanje potrošnikov.
As to physical characteristics, the presence of the two swing doors placed side-by-side was considered the most immediately visible feature.
Glede fizikalnih lastnostih se je za najhitreje opazno značilnost štela prisotnost dvoje nihajnih vrat, nameščenih vzporedno.
As to consumer perception, a key element was the fact that the claimant itself had repeatedly marketed and advertised the three-door model as a side-by-side refrigerator.
V zvezi z dojemanjem potrošnikov pa je bil ključni element dejstvo, da je model s troje vzporedno nameščenimi vrati celo sam vložnik pogosto tržil in oglaševal kot ameriški hladilnik.
The Commission was informed that inner compartments were placed differently in a typical side-by-side refrigerator and in a three-door model, but this distinction was not considered decisive for the exclusion of three doors side-by-side refrigerators from the product definition since no conclusive evidence had been submitted in this respect.
Po informacijah, ki jih je imela Komisija, je namestitev notranjih predelkov v ameriškem hladilniku drugačna kot v modelu s troje vrati, vendar se ta razlika ni zdela odločilna za izključitev hladilnikov s troje vrati iz opredelitve izdelka, saj za to bilo predloženih trdnih dokazov.
On the basis of the information available at that time, the Commission had indicated in recital 14 of the provisional Regulation that ‘there is no commonly used definition of side-by-side refrigerators’.
Na podlagi takrat razpoložljivih informacij je Komisija v uvodni izjavi začasne uredbe 14 navedla, da „ni splošno določene opredelitve ameriških hladilnikov“.
This issue continued to be examined after provisional measures.
To vprašanje se je po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov še dodatno preučilo.
Additional evidence supporting a definition of the segment of side-by-side refrigerators on the basis of the inner configuration of the compartments and not on the basis of the position of the doors was submitted by the above-mentioned exporter.
Zgoraj navedeni izvoznik je priložil dodatne dokaze, ki podpirajo opredelitev segmenta ameriških hladilnikov na podlagi notranje postavitve predelkov in ne na podlagi postavitve vrat.
After definitive disclosure, in the light of further evidence provided by the same exporter, the positions expressed by some leading research institutes and classification bodies, most of which classify side-by-side refrigerators on the basis of the inner configuration and not on the basis of the position of the doors, were further assessed.
Glede na dodatne dokaze, ki jih je predložil isti izvoznik, so bili po dokončnem razkritju dodatno ocenjena stališča nekaterih vodilnih raziskovalnih inštitutov in organov za razvrščanje, med katerimi večina ameriške hladilnike razvršča na podlagi notranje postavitve in ne postavitve vrat.
This lead to the conclusion that, from the point of view of physical characteristics, the three-door model cannot be considered as part of the side-by-side segment, as referred to under recital 10 above.
Na podlagi tega je mogoče sklepati, da se glede na fizikalne lastnosti model s troje vrati ne more šteti za del segmenta ameriških hladilnikov iz uvodne izjave 10.
As to consumer perception, both the claimant and the Community industry submitted consumer surveys supporting their respective views and contradicting each other.
Glede dojemanja potrošnikov so tako vložnik kot industrija Skupnosti predložili potrošniške raziskave, ki podpirajo njihova stališča in si med seboj nasprotujejo.
In this respect, therefore, no clear conclusion could be drawn in one direction or the other.
Zato v zvezi s tem ni mogoč jasen zaključek v nobeno smer.
It stems from the above that the three-door model should be regarded as belonging to the segment of the bottom-mount refrigerators and not to the segment of the side-by-side refrigerators.
Iz zgoraj navedenega izhaja, da mora model s troje vrati spadati v segment hladilnikov z zamrzovalnikom spodaj in ne v segment ameriških hladilnikov.
Claim (ii) was therefore accepted.
Zato je bil zahtevek (ii) sprejet.
As a consequence, it was deemed appropriate to revise the product scope definition as determined in the provisional Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se je zdelo primerno popraviti opredelitev obsega izdelka iz začasne uredbe.
Therefore, the product concerned is definitively defined as combined refrigerator-freezers with a capacity exceeding 400 litres and with the freezer and refrigerator compartments placed side-by-side, originating in the Republic of Korea, currently classifiable within CN code ex84181020.
Zadevni izdelek se zato dokončno opredeli kot kombinacija hladilnika in zamrzovalnika prostornine nad 400 litrov, z vzporedno namestitvijo zamrzovalnega in hladilnega predelka, s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex84181020.
In the absence of any comments, the content of recitals 18 to 22 of the provisional Regulation concerning normal value is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se vsebina uvodnih izjav 18 do 22 začasne uredbe v zvezi z normalno vrednostjo potrdi.
As stipulated in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation, the export price for sales into the Community made via related importers was constructed on the basis of the resale price to the first independent customer in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je bilo določeno v uvodni izjavi 23 začasne uredbe, je bila izvozna cena za prodajo v Skupnost, ki je potekala prek povezanih uvoznikov, konstruirana na podlagi cene pri nadaljnji prodaji prvi neodvisni stranki v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
In this export price construction, a profit margin of a company which was considered to be an independent importer of the product concerned had been used.
Za konstruiranje te izvozne cene se je uporabila stopnja dobička družbe, ki se je štela za neodvisnega uvoznika zadevnega izdelka.
After final disclosure was made to the interested parties, one exporting producer submitted that the company used for establishing this profit margin was not an unrelated importer but a first independent customer of one of its related importers.
Po dokončnem razkritju zainteresiranim strankam je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da družba, ki se je uporabila za določanje te stopnje dobička, ni bila nepovezan uvoznik, temveč prva neodvisna stranka enega od njegovih povezanih uvoznikov.
The claim was duly investigated and it was concluded that the company concerned indeed did not qualify as an unrelated importer.
Po ustrezni preučitvi zahtevka je bilo sklenjeno, da se zadevna družba dejansko ne more šteti za nepovezanega uvoznika.
Consequently, it was decided that its profit margin could not be used in the construction of the export prices.
V skladu s tem je bilo odločeno, da se njegova stopnja dobička ne more uporabiti za konstruiranje izvoznih cen.
Therefore, an alternative source had to be found to establish a reasonable margin for profit as required under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo treba za določitev ustrezne stopnje dobička v skladu z zahtevo iz člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe najti drug vir.
No alternative independent importer's profit information could be acquired within the framework of this investigation.
V okviru te preiskave ni bilo mogoče dobiti nobenih informacij o dobičku drugih neodvisnih uvoznikov.