natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in povzročanja škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 („OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2000 to the end of the investigation period (‘period considered’).
Ocenjevanje trendov, ki so pomembni pri ocenjevanju škode, je zajemalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2000 do konca OP („zadevno obdobje“).
The product concerned is finished polyester filament apparel fabrics (‘FPFAF’) which is woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn containing 85 % or more by weight of textured or non textured polyester filaments, dyed or printed.
Zadevni izdelek so dokončane tkanine za oblačila iz poliestrskih filamentov („FPFAF“), ki so tkanine iz preje iz umetnih filamentov, ki vsebujejo 85 masnih % ali več teksturiranih ali neteksturiranih poliestrskih filamentov, barvanih ali tiskanih.
It is normally used for apparel applications, i.e. inter alia for making lining for clothing and for making anoraks, sports wear, ski wear, underwear and fashion items.
Običajno se uporabljajo pri oblačilih, tj. med drugim za podloge oblek in za izdelavo vetrovk s kapuco tipa anorak, športnih oblačil, smučarskih oblačil, spodnjega perila in modnih izdelkov.
The product concerned is produced by weaving polyester filament yarn (which is not pre-dyed) and then printed or dyed in order to obtain a specific design or colour.
Zadevni izdelek se proizvaja s tkanjem preje poliestrskih filamentov (ki ni predbarvana), ki se nato natiska ali obarva tako, da je rezultat določena oblika ali barva.
It is therefore distinguished from unbleached or bleached woven fabric of synthetic filament yarn that is a product formed after weaving but before dyeing, and which forms the raw material for the product concerned.
Zato se razlikuje od nebeljenih ali beljenih tkanin iz preje iz umetnih filamentov, izdelek, ki nastane po tkanju, a pred barvanjem, in ki predstavlja surovino za zadevni izdelek.
It can also be distinguished from woven polyester filament fabrics for which pre-dyed yarn is woven into cloth, and the design is created by weaving the pattern.
Razlikovati ga je mogoče tudi od tkanin iz filamentov, za katere je predbarvana preja stkana v tkanino, oblika pa se ustvari s tkanjem vzorca.
The latter product has different basic physical and chemical characteristics, since the raw material used (pre-dyed yarn) is different, and the design is obtained through weaving and not printing or dyeing.
Omenjeni proizvod ima drugačne osnovne fizične in kemične lastnosti, saj se zanj uporablja drugačna surovina (predbarvana preja), oblika pa se ustvari s tkanjem, ne s tiskanjem ali barvanjem.
In addition, such type of finished fabric is normally used for soft furnishing applications, whereas the product concerned is almost exclusively used for making clothing.
Poleg tega se takšen tip dokončanih tkanin ponavadi uporablja za oblazinjeno pohištvo, medtem ko se zadevni izdelek uporablja skoraj izključno za izdelavo oblačil.
The investigation has shown that all types of the product concerned as defined in recital 11, despite differences in a variety of factors such as colour, size of the yarns and finish, have the same basic physical, and chemical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vsi tipi zadevnega izdelka, definiranega v uvodni izjavi 11, kljub razlikam v vrsti dejavnikov, kot so barva, velikost prej in končna obdelava, enake osnovne fizične in kemične lastnosti ter da se uporabljajo za enake namene.
Therefore, and for the purpose of the present anti-dumping proceeding, all types of the product concerned are regarded as one product.
Zato in zaradi trenutnega protidampinškega postopka se vsi tipi zadevnega izdelka obravnavajo kot en proizvod.
The product concerned falls within CN codes 54075200, 54075400, 54076130, 54076190 and ex54076990.
Zadevni izdelek spada pod oznake KN 54075200, 54075400, 54076130, 54076190 in ex54076990.
No differences were found between the product concerned and the FPFAF produced and sold on the domestic market in the PRC or in Turkey, which served as an analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value with respect to certain imports from the PRC.
Med zadevnim izdelkom in FPFAF, ki se proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v LRK ali v Turčiji, ki je služila kot analogna država za vzpostavitev normalne vrednosti v zvezi z določenim uvozom iz LRK, niso bile ugotovljene nobene razlike.
Indeed, they both have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Pokazalo se je, da imata oba enake osnovne fizične in kemične lastnosti ter možnosti uporabe.
Likewise, no differences were found between the product concerned and the FPFAF produced by the Community industry and sold on the Community market.
Tudi med zadevnim izdelkom in FPFAF, ki ga proizvaja industrija Skupnosti in se prodaja na trgu Skupnosti, niso bile ugotovljene nobene razlike.
They both also were found to share the same physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Pokazalo se je, da imata tudi ta dva proizvoda enake fizične in kemične lastnosti ter možnosti uporabe.
Therefore, these products are provisionally considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ti proizvodi začasno obravnavajo kot enaki v okviru pomena člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
Market economy treatment (MET)
Obravnavanje z vidika tržnega gospodarstva (MET)
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c).
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe, se v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom iz LRK za tiste proizvajalce, ki izpolnjujejo kriterije, določene v členu 2(7)(c), normalna vrednost določi v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 člena 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Briefly, and for ease of reference only, the MET criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Kriteriji MET so na kratko in zaradi lažjega sklicevanja v povzeti obliki navedeni spodaj:
Business decisions and costs are made in response to market conditions and without State interference;
poslovne odločitve in stroški so izvedeni kot odgovor na razmere na trgu in brez vmešavanja države;
Acounting records independently audited in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes;
računovodske evidence se neodvisno revidirajo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in veljajo za vse namene;
There are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system;
iz prejšnjega netržnega gospodarskega sistema niso prenesena nobena večja izkrivljanja;
Legal certainty and stability is provided by bankruptcy and property laws;
pravno varnost in stabilnost zagotavljajo zakoni o stečaju in pravo lastninskih razmerij;
Currency exchanges are carried out at the market rate.
izmenjava valut poteka po tržni stopnji.
In the present investigation, 49 exporting producers in the PRC made themselves known and requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V tej preiskavi se je prijavilo 49 proizvajalcev-izvoznikov iz LRK in zahtevalo MET v skladu s členom 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Each single MET application was analysed.
Analiziran je bil vsak zahtevek za MET.
In view of the large number of companies concerned, on-spot investigations were carried out only at the premises of eight companies (see recital (7)).
Zaradi velikega števila zadevnih družb so bile preiskave na kraju samem izvedene samo v prostorih osmih družb (glej uvodno izjavo (6)).
For the remaining companies, a detailed desk analysis of all information submitted was carried out, and an extensive exchange of correspondence took place with the companies concerned, where elements in their submission were missing or unclear.
V zvezi z ostalimi družbami je bila izvedena podrobna analiza vseh predloženih podatkov, potekalo pa je tudi izčrpno dopisovanje z zadevnimi družbami, kjer so v predložitvah podatki manjkali ali pa so bili nejasni.
Where a subsidiary or any other company related to the applicant in the People’s Republic of China is a producer and/or an exporter of the product concerned, the related party was also invited to complete the MET claim form.
Če je odvisna družba ali kakšna druga družba, povezana z vlagateljem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, proizvajalec in/ali izvoznik zadevnega izdelka, je bila tudi ta povezana stranka povabljena, da izpolni obrazec zahtevka MET.
Indeed, MET can be granted only if all related companies meet the criteria set above.
MET je mogoče odobriti le, če vse povezane družbe izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene zgoraj.
As regards the companies for which on-spot investigations were carried out, the investigation revealed that three of the eight Chinese exporting producers fulfilled all the conditions for MET (see list of companies in recital (23)).
V zvezi z družbami, pri katerih so bile izvedene preiskave na kraju samem, se je pokazalo, da trije od osmih kitajskih proizvajalcev-izvoznikov izpolnjujejo vse pogoje za MET (glej seznam družb v uvodni izjavi (23)).
The remaining five claims had to be rejected.
Preostalih pet zahtevkov je bilo zavrnjenih.
The criteria not met by the five exporting producers are set out in the table below.
Kriteriji, ki jih pet proizvajalcev-izvoznikov ni izpolnjevalo, so navedeni v tabeli spodaj.
As regards the remaining 41 companies, the analysis carried out individually for each company concluded that MET should not be granted to 19 companies, since they manifestly did not meet the criteria of Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s preostalimi 41 družbami je analiza, izvedena za vsako posamezno družbo, pokazala, da MET ni mogoče odobriti 19 družbam, saj očitno niso izpolnjevale kriterijev člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was considered that 10 out of these 19 companies did not sufficiently co-operate in the investigation by not submitting the necessary information requested.
Zaključeno je bilo, da 10 od teh 19 družb v preiskavi ni sodelovalo v zadostni meri, saj niso predložile zahtevanih potrebnih podatkov.
Indeed, even after a deficiency letter, those companies failed to sufficiently demonstrate that either themselves, or any related company(ies) involved in the production/sales of the product concerned, fulfilled the relevant MET criteria.
Te družbe celo po prejetju pisma, v katerem so jim bile pojasnjene pomanjkljivosti, niso ustrezno dokazale, da one same ali kakšna povezana družba (družbe), ki sodeluje v proizvodnji/prodaji zadevnega izdelka, izpolnjujejo ustrezne kriterije MET.
For the other 9 out of these 19 companies, the criteria not met are also set out in the table below.
Tudi za preostalih 9 od 19 družb so kriteriji, ki jih ne izpolnjujejo, navedeni v spodnji tabeli.
The remaining 22 companies could successfully demonstrate that they met the five relevant MET criteria.
22 preostalih družb je uspešno dokazalo, da izpolnjujejo pet ustreznih kriterijev MET.
The following table summarises the determination for each company not granted MET, against each of the five criteria as set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation:
Spodnja tabela povzema odločitve za vse družbe, ki jim MET ni bil odobren, za vsakega od petih kriterijev, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Source: verified questionnaire replies of cooperating Chinese exporters.
Vir: preverjeni odgovori sodelujočih kitajskih izvoznikov na vprašalnik.
Not MET
Neizpolnjen
On this basis, the exporting producers in the PRC which obtained MET are the following:
Na podlagi tega so proizvajalci-izvozniki iz LRK, ki so pridobili MET, naslednji:
Individual treatment (IT)
Individualna obravnava (IT)
Further to article 2(7)(a), a country-wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under Article 2(7), except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate that they meet all criteria set out in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation for receiving individual treatment.
Glede na člen 2(7)(a) se za države, ki spadajo v okviru člena 2(7), vzpostavi carina na ravni države, če sploh, razen v primerih, ko države lahko dokažejo, da izpolnjujejo vse pogoje, določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe, za individualno obravnavo.
The exporting producers which requested MET, also claimed individual treatment in the event of not being granted MET.
Proizvajalci-izvozniki, ki so zahtevali MET, so zahtevali tudi individualno obravnavo, v primeru, da jim MET ne bi bil odobren.
Seven additional exporting producers requested only individual treatment.
Dodatnih sedem proizvajalcev-izvoznikov je zahtevalo samo individualno obravnavo.
Firstly, as regards the companies that claimed but failed to obtain MET, it was found that 13 companies met all the requirements for IT set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi z družbami, ki so zahtevale MET, a jim ni bil odobren, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je 13 družb izpolnjevalo vse pogoje za IT, določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
As far as the other companies are concerned, ten of them did not sufficiently co-operate in order to be granted MET, and their level of cooperation was so low that they did not even submit enough evidence to justify their request for IT.
Kar se tiče drugih družb, jih deset ni sodelovalo v zadostni meri, da bi jim bil odobren MET, stopnja njihovega sodelovanja pa je bila tako nizka, da niso predložile niti dovolj dokazov, da bi upravičile zahtevek za IT.
One other company could not be granted IT because it could not properly and sufficiently demonstrate that its export prices and quantities, and conditions and terms of sale are freely determined.
Eni družbi IT ni bil odobren, ker ni pravilno in v zadostni meri dokazala, da svobodno določa svoje izvozne cene in količine ter pogoje prodaje.
Indeed, for the majority of the export sales it was not possible to verify the final customer or payment of the goods, and the company could not clarify the strong doubts that, under those circumstances, the State was involved in the price setting of the company.
Za večino izvozne prodaje ni bilo mogoče preveriti plačil blaga niti kdo je končni kupec, družba pa ni razjasnila niti močnih dvomov, da je v teh okoliščinah država vpletena v določanje cen te družbe.
Secondly, from the seven companies that only requested IT, five were found to meet the requirements set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Nadalje je bilo ugotovljeno, da pet od sedmih družb, ki so zahtevale samo IT, izpolnjuje pogoje, določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The other two companies could not sufficiently demonstrate that their export prices and quantities as well as the conditions and terms of the sales were freely determined, and without any State interference.
Preostali dve družbi nista ustrezno dokazali, da svobodno in brez vmešavanja države določata svoje izvozne cene in količine ter pogoje prodaje.
Indeed, both companies did not provide the necessary requested information, namely their Articles of Association in force during the whole IP, and one of them was also found to be State owned during the major part of the IP.
Nobena od teh dveh družb ni predložila potrebnih zahtevanih informacij, to je statuta, ki je veljal v času OP; za eno od njih je bilo celo ugotovljeno, da je bila v večjem delu OP v lasti države.
It was therefore concluded that IT should be granted to the following 18 companies:
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se IT odobri naslednjim 18 družbam:
Shaoxing Ronghao Textiles Co. Ltd (and related company Shaoxing County Qing Fang Cheng Textile import and export Co. Ltd.)
Shaoxing Ronghao Textiles Co. Ltd (in povezana družba Shaoxing County Qing Fang Cheng Textile import and export Co. Ltd.).
It is recalled that in view of the large number of companies involved, it was decided to make use of the provisions for sampling, and that for this purpose, a sample of eight companies, with the largest export volumes to the EU was chosen, in agreement with the Chinese authorities.
Opozarja se, da je bilo zaradi velikega števila vpletenih družb sklenjeno, da se uporabijo določbe za vzorčenje; v ta namen je bil, v soglasju s kitajskimi oblastmi, izbran vzorec osmih družb z največjimi izvoznimi obsegi v EU.
In this respect, the analysis subsequently revealed that from the eight companies originally selected, MET could be granted to three companies, and IT to four of the companies concerned.
V zvezi s tem se je v analizi kasneje pokazalo, da je od osmih družb, ki so bile izbrane v vzorec, MET mogoče odobriti trem, IT pa štirim družbam.
The provisions on sampling have therefore been applied on that basis.
Določbe o vzorčenju se torej uporabljajo na tej podlagi.
Determination of normal value for exporting producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce-izvoznike, ki jim je bil MET odobren
As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, the Commission first established, for each exporting producer concerned, whether its total domestic sales of FPFAF were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Komisija je pri določitvi normalne vrednosti za vsakega vpletenega proizvajalca-izvoznika najprej določila, ali je njegova skupna domača prodaja FPFAF reprezentativna v primerjavi s skupno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume of each exporting producer was at least 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se je štelo, da je domača prodaja reprezentativna, če je bil skupen obseg domače prodaje vsakega proizvajalca-izvoznika vsaj 5 % njegovega skupnega obsega izvozne prodaje v Skupnost.
For the exporting producers having overall representative domestic sales, the Commission subsequently identified the types of FPFAF sold domestically which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je za tiste proizvajalce-izvoznike, ki so imeli v celoti reprezentativno domačo prodajo, nato določila tipe FPFAF, ki so jih prodajali na domačem trgu in ki so bili identični ali neposredno primerljivi s tipi, ki so jih prodajali za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each of those types, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsakega od teh tipov je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za člen 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določenega tipa se je obravnavala kot dovolj reprezentativna, če je skupen obseg domače prodaje tistega tipa v času OP predstavljal 5 % ali več skupnega obsega prodaje primerljivega tipa, ki ga je določeni proizvajalec-izvoznik izvažal v Skupnost.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each type of the product concerned could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the type in question.
Z ugotavljanjem deleža dobičkonosne prodaje zadevnega tipa neodvisnim strankam je bilo preučeno tudi, ali je mogoče domačo prodajo vsakega tipa zadevnega izdelka obravnavati, kot da je bila izvedena v običajnem poteku trgovine.
In cases where the sales volume of a type of FPFAF, sold at a net sales price equal to or above its cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above its cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price.
V primerih, kjer je obseg prodaje tipa FPFAF, ki se je prodajala po neto prodajni ceni, enaki ali višji od stroškov proizvodnje, predstavljal več kot 80 % skupnega obsega prodaje tega tipa in kjer je bila tehtana povprečna cena tega tipa enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni.
This price was calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Ta cena je bila izračunana kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje tega tipa v času OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Where the volume of profitable sales of a type of FPFAF represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below its cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, which was calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only, provided that these sales represented 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
V primerih, kjer je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje tipa FPFAF predstavljal 80 % ali manj skupnega obsega prodaje tistega tipa ali kjer je bila tehtana povprečna cena tistega tipa nižja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje tistega tipa le, če je ta prodaja predstavljala 10 % ali več skupnega obsega prodaje tistega tipa.
Finally, where the volume of profitable sales of any type of FPFAF represented less than 10 % of the total sales volume of that type, it was considered that this particular type was sold in insufficient quantities for the domestic price to provide an appropriate basis for the establishment of the normal value.
Končno, kjer je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje katerega koli tipa FPFAF predstavljal manj kot 10 % skupnega obsega prodaje tistega tipa, se je obravnavalo, kot da tisti tip proizvoda ni bil prodan v zadostnih količinah, da bi domača cena zagotovila primerno osnovo za vzpostavitev normalne vrednosti.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular type sold by an exporting producer could not be used, constructed normal value was used in preference to domestic prices of other exporting producers.
Kjer ni bilo mogoče uporabiti domačih cen določenega tipa, ki ga je prodajal proizvajalec-izvoznik, se je uporabila sestavljena normalna vrednost namesto domačih cen drugih proizvajalcev-izvoznikov.
Due to the number of different types and the variety of factors (such as the type of the fibres, the size of the yarns, the finishing of the fabrics) affecting them, using domestic prices of other exporting producers would have meant in this case making numerous adjustments, most of which would have had to be based on estimates.
Zaradi števila različnih tipov in vrste dejavnikov (kot so tip vlaken, velikost prej in dokončna obdelava tkanin), ki na njih vplivajo, bi uporaba domačih cen drugih proizvajalcev v tem primeru pomenila, da bi bilo treba izvesti številne prilagoditve, večina katerih bi temeljila na ocenah.
It was therefore considered that the construction of the normal value for each exporting producer formed a more appropriate method.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je bolj primerno uporabiti sestavljeno normalno vrednost za vsakega proizvajalca-izvoznika.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to each exporter’s manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (‘SG&A’) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Na podlagi tega je bila v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost sestavljena tako, da sta se proizvodnim stroškom izvoznih tipov vsakega proizvajalca prištela znesek, prilagojen, kjer je bilo potrebno, za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške, ter razumna stopnja dobička.