natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation as supplemented by Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 1307/87 (OJ L 124, 13.5.1987, p. 6) and last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 860/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 26).
Uredba, kakor je bila dopolnjena z Uredbo (Euratom, ESPJ, EGS) št. 1307/87 (UL L št.124, 13.5.1987, str. 6), in kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, ESPJ, Euratom) št.860/2004 (UL L 161, 30.4.2004, str. 26).
Done at Brussels, 19 December 2006.
V Bruslju, 19. decembra 2006.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1750/2002 (OJ L 264, 2.10.2002, p. 15).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (Euratom, ESPJ, ES) št… 1750/2002 (UL L 264, 2.10.2002, str. 15).
Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Uredba (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
creating a European order for payment procedure
o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 61(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 61(c) Pogodbe,
The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured.
Skupnost si je zastavila cilj ohranjanja in razvijanja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, v katerem je zajamčen prosti pretok oseb.
For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Community is to adopt, inter alia, measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications and needed for the proper functioning of the internal market.
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja bi morala Skupnost med drugim sprejeti ukrepe na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi elementi, ki so potrebni za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
According to Article 65(c) of the Treaty, these measures are to include measures eliminating obstacles to the good functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States.
V skladu s členom 65(c) Pogodbe bi morali ti ukrepi vključevati odpravo ovir za nemoten potek civilnih postopkov, po potrebi s spodbujanjem združljivosti pravil o civilnih postopkih, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 invited the Council and the Commission to prepare new legislation on issues that are instrumental to smooth judicial cooperation and to enhanced access to law and specifically made reference, in that context, to orders for money payment.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 pozval Svet in Komisijo, naj pripravita novo zakonodajo o zadevah, ki so bistvenega pomena za dobro pravosodno sodelovanje in izboljšan dostop do pravnega varstva, ter je v zvezi s tem posebej izpostavil plačilne naloge.
On 30 November 2000, the Council adopted a joint Commission and Council programme of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters [3].
Svet je 30. novembra 2000 sprejel skupni program ukrepov Komisije in Sveta za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [3].
The programme envisages the possibility of a specific, uniform or harmonised procedure laid down within the Community to obtain a judicial decision in specific areas including that of uncontested claims.
Program predvideva možnost, da se v Skupnosti določi poseben, enoten ali usklajen postopek za izdajanje sodnih odločb na določenih področjih, vključno s področjem nespornih zahtevkov.
This was taken forward by the Hague Programme, adopted by the European Council on 5 November 2004, which called for work to be actively pursued on the European order for payment.
To je bilo upoštevano v Haaškem programu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel 5. novembra 2004, v katerem se poziva k aktivnemu nadaljevanju dela v zvezi z evropskim plačilnim nalogom.
The Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure and on measures to simplify and speed up small claims litigation on 20 December 2002.
Komisija je 20. decembra 2002 sprejela Zeleno knjigo o postopku za evropski plačilni nalog ter ukrepih za poenostavitev in pospešitev sodnih postopkov v sporih majhne vrednosti.
The Green Paper launched consultations on the possible objectives and features of a uniform or harmonised European procedure for the recovery of uncontested claims.
Zelena knjiga je odprla posvetovanje o možnih ciljih in značilnostih enotnega ali usklajenega evropskega postopka za izterjavo nespornih zahtevkov.
The swift and efficient recovery of outstanding debts over which no legal controversy exists is of paramount importance for economic operators in the European Union, as late payments constitute a major reason for insolvency threatening the survival of businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, and resulting in numerous job losses.
Hitra in učinkovita izterjava neporavnanih, a nespornih dolgov, je bistvenega pomena za gospodarske subjekte v Evropski uniji, saj so zamude pri plačilih glavni razlog za plačilno nesposobnost, ki ogroža preživetje podjetij, zlasti malih in srednje velikih, ter povzroča izgubo številnih delovnih mest.
All Member States are trying to tackle the issue of mass recovery of uncontested claims, in the majority of States by means of a simplified order for payment procedure, but both the content of national legislation and the performance of domestic procedures vary substantially.
Države članice poskušajo rešiti problem množičnosti izterjav nespornih zahtevkov, in sicer v večini držav z določitvijo poenostavljenega postopka za plačilni nalog, vendar se tako vsebina nacionalnih zakonodaj kot tudi učinkovitost domačih postopkov močno razlikujejo.
Furthermore, the procedures currently in existence are frequently either inadmissible or impracticable in cross-border cases.
Poleg tega so trenutno obstoječi postopki v čezmejnih zadevah pogosto nedopustni ali so neizvedljivi.
The resulting impediments to access to efficient justice in cross-border cases and the distortion of competition within the internal market due to imbalances in the functioning of procedural means afforded to creditors in different Member States necessitate Community legislation guaranteeing a level playing field for creditors and debtors throughout the European Union.
Zaradi ovir za dostop do učinkovitega pravnega varstva v čezmejnih zadevah, ki so posledica zgoraj navedenega, in izkrivljanja konkurence na notranjem trgu zaradi neenakega delovanja procesnih sredstev, ki so na voljo upnikom v različnih državah članicah, je potrebna zakonodaja Skupnosti, ki zagotavlja enake pogoje za dolžnike in upnike v vsej Evropski uniji.
The purpose of this Regulation is to simplify, speed up and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure, and to permit the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout the Member States by laying down minimum standards, compliance with which renders unnecessary any intermediate proceedings in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement.
Namen te uredbe je z uvedbo postopka za evropski plačilni nalog poenostaviti, pospešiti in zmanjšati stroške sodnih postopkov v čezmejnih zadevah v zvezi z nespornimi denarnimi zahtevki ter dopustiti prosti pretok evropskih plačilnih nalogov v vseh državah članicah z določitvijo minimalnih standardov, katerih upoštevanje povzroči nepotrebnost vseh vmesnih postopkov v državi članici izvršbe pred priznanjem in izvršbo.
The procedure established by this Regulation should serve as an additional and optional means for the claimant, who remains free to resort to a procedure provided for by national law.
Postopek, uveden s to uredbo, bi moral biti za tožečo stranko dodatno in neobvezno sredstvo, ki ji dopušča, da uporabi postopek, ki ga predvideva nacionalno pravo.
Accordingly, this Regulation neither replaces nor harmonises the existing mechanisms for the recovery of uncontested claims under national law.
Ta uredba ne nadomešča in ne usklajuje obstoječih mehanizmov za izterjavo nespornih zahtevkov v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
The procedure should be based, to the largest extent possible, on the use of standard forms in any communication between the court and the parties in order to facilitate its administration and enable the use of automatic data processing.
Zaradi olajšanja izvajanja postopka in uporabe avtomatske obdelave podatkov bi moral postopek v največji možni meri temeljiti na uporabi standardnih obrazcev za komunikacijo med sodiščem in strankami.
When deciding which courts are to have jurisdiction to issue a European order for payment, Member States should take due account of the need to ensure access to justice.
Pri odločanju, katera sodišča so pristojna za izdajo evropskega plačilnega naloga, bi morale države članice ustrezno upoštevati potrebo po zagotovitvi dostopa do pravnega varstva.
In the application for a European order for payment, the claimant should be obliged to provide information that is sufficient to clearly identify and support the claim in order to place the defendant in a position to make a well-informed choice either to oppose the claim or to leave it uncontested.
V vlogi za evropski plačilni nalog bi morala biti tožeča stranka obvezana predložiti podatke, ki zadostujejo za jasno opredelitev zahtevka in njegove utemeljitve, tako da se tožena stranka lahko na podlagi teh podatkov odloči, ali bo zahtevku ugovarjala ali ne.
In that context, it should be compulsory for the claimant to include a description of evidence supporting the claim.
V zvezi s tem bi morala biti tožeča stranka obvezana, da priloži opis dokazov, ki podpirajo zahtevek.
For that purpose the application form should include as exhaustive a list as possible of types of evidence that are usually produced in support of pecuniary claims.
V ta namen bi moral obrazec za vlogo vsebovati kar se da izčrpen seznam vrst dokazov, ki se običajno predložijo v podporo denarnim zahtevkom.
The lodging of an application for a European order for payment should entail the payment of any applicable court fees.
Predložitev vloge za evropski plačilni nalog bi morala predpostavljati plačilo vseh veljavnih sodnih taks.
The court should examine the application, including the issue of jurisdiction and the description of evidence, on the basis of the information provided in the application form.
Sodišče bi moralo na podlagi v vlogi navedenih podatkov preučiti zahtevek, vključno z vprašanjem pristojnosti in opisom dokazov.
This would allow the court to examine prima facie the merits of the claim and inter alia to exclude clearly unfounded claims or inadmissible applications.
To naj bi sodišču omogočilo, da na prvi pogled preuči vsebino zahtevka in med drugim izključi očitno neutemeljene zahtevke ali nedopustne vloge.
The examination should not need to be carried out by a judge.
Za preučitev naj ne bi bilo potrebno, da jo izvede sodnik.
There is to be no right of appeal against the rejection of the application.
Zoper zavrnitev vloge naj ne bi bilo pravnega sredstva.
This does not preclude, however, a possible review of the decision rejecting the application at the same level of jurisdiction in accordance with national law.
Vendar to ne izključuje možnosti ponovne preučitve odločbe o zavrnitvi zahtevka na isti stopnji.
The European order for payment should apprise the defendant of his options to pay the amount awarded to the claimant or to send a statement of opposition within a time limit of 30 days if he wishes to contest the claim.
Evropski plačilni nalog bi moral toženo stranko poučiti o možnosti, da bodisi plača znesek, ki je bil dodeljen tožeči stranki, bodisi da v 30 dneh pošlje ugovor, če želi izpodbijati zahtevek.
In addition to being provided with full information concerning the claim as supplied by the claimant, the defendant should be advised of the legal significance of the European order for payment and in particular of the consequences of leaving the claim uncontested.
Poleg vseh podatkov o zahtevku, ki jih predloži tožeča stranka, bi bilo treba toženo stranko poučiti o pravnih posledicah evropskega plačilnega naloga in zlasti o posledicah neizpodbijanja zahtevka.
Due to differences between Member States' rules of civil procedure and especially those governing the service of documents, it is necessary to lay down a specific and detailed definition of minimum standards that should apply in the context of the European order for payment procedure.
Zaradi razlik v civilnih postopkih med državami članicami in predvsem v pravilih, ki urejajo vročanje pisanj, bi bilo treba določiti posebno in podrobno opredelitev minimalnih standardov, ki naj se uporabljajo v postopku za evropski plačilni nalog.
In particular, as regards the fulfilment of those standards, any method based on legal fiction should not be considered sufficient for the service of the European order for payment.
Zlasti se noben način, ki temelji na pravni domnevi o izpolnitvi teh standardov, ne bi smel šteti kot zadosten za vročitev evropskega plačilnega naloga.
All the methods of service listed in Articles 13 and 14 are characterised by either complete certainty (Article 13) or a very high degree of likelihood (Article 14) that the document served has reached its addressee.
Za vse načine vročanja, navedene v členih 13 in 14, je značilna bodisi popolna gotovost (člen 13) bodisi zelo visoka stopnja verjetnosti (člen 14), da je vročeno pisanje dejansko prišlo v naslovnikove roke.
Personal service on certain persons other than the defendant himself pursuant to Article 14(1)(a) and (b) should be deemed to meet the requirements of those provisions only if those persons actually accepted/received the European order for payment.
Za osebno vročanje določenim osebam, ki niso tožene stranke, bi se na podlagi člena 14(1)(a) in (b) moralo šteti, da izpolnjuje zahteve navedenih določb samo, če so te osebe evropski plačilni nalog dejansko sprejele/prejele.
Article 15 should apply to situations where the defendant cannot represent himself in court, as in the case of a legal person, and where a person authorised to represent him is determined by law, as well as to situations where the defendant has authorised another person, in particular a lawyer, to represent him in the specific court proceedings at issue.
Člen 15 bi se moral uporabljati za primere, ko se tožena stranka ne more sama zastopati na sodišču, kot v primeru pravne osebe, in ko osebo, ki jo zastopa, določa zakon, kot tudi v primeru, ko je tožena stranka pooblastila drugo osebo, predvsem odvetnika, da jo zastopa v določenih sodnih postopkih v zadevi.
The defendant may submit his statement of opposition using the standard form set out in this Regulation.
Tožena stranka lahko predloži ugovor na standardnem obrazcu, ki je določen s to uredbo.
However, the courts should take into account any other written form of opposition if it is expressed in a clear manner.
Vendar bi morala sodišča upoštevati tudi ugovore, ki so predloženi v drugačni pisni obliki, iz katere je jasno razvidna vsebina ugovora.
A statement of opposition filed within the time limit should terminate the European order for payment procedure and should lead to an automatic transfer of the case to ordinary civil proceedings unless the claimant has explicitly requested that the proceedings be terminated in that event.
Pravočasen ugovor bi moral zaključiti postopek za evropski plačilni nalog in privesti do neposrednega prehoda zadeve na običajni civilni postopek, razen če je tožeča stranka izrecno zahtevala, da se postopek v tem primeru zaključi.
For the purposes of this Regulation the concept of ordinary civil proceedings should not necessarily be interpreted within the meaning of national law.
Za namene te uredbe se pojma običajni civilni postopek ne bi smelo nujno razlagati v smislu nacionalne zakonodaje.
After the expiry of the time limit for submitting the statement of opposition, in certain exceptional cases the defendant should be entitled to apply for a review of the European order for payment.
Po izteku roka za predložitev ugovora bi morala imeti tožena stranka v določenih izjemnih primerih pravico, da zahteva ponovno preučitev evropskega plačilnega naloga.
Review in exceptional cases should not mean that the defendant is given a second opportunity to oppose the claim.
Taka ponovna preučitev v izjemnih primerih ne bi smela pomeniti, da bi imela tožena stranka dvakrat možnost vložiti ugovor zoper zahtevek.
During the review procedure the merits of the claim should not be evaluated beyond the grounds resulting from the exceptional circumstances invoked by the defendant.
Med postopkom ponovne preučitve naj se vsebino zahtevka presoja le v delu, ki zadeva razloge, povezane z izjemnimi okoliščinami, ki jih je uveljavljala tožena stranka.
The other exceptional circumstances could include a situation where the European order for payment was based on false information provided in the application form.
Druge izjemne okoliščine bi lahko vključevale primer, ko evropski plačilni nalog temelji na neresničnih podatkih, navedenih v obrazcu za vlogo.
Court fees covered by Article 25 should not include for example lawyers' fees or costs of service of documents by an entity other than a court.
Sodne takse iz člena 25 ne bi smele na primer vključevati odvetniških stroškov ali stroškov vročanja pisanj s strani subjekta, ki ni sodišče.
A European order for payment issued in one Member State which has become enforceable should be regarded for the purposes of enforcement as if it had been issued in the Member State in which enforcement is sought.
Izvršljiv evropski plačilni nalog, izdan v eni državi članici, bi bilo treba za namene izvršbe obravnavati kot plačilni nalog, izdan v državi članici, v kateri se izvršba zahteva.
Mutual trust in the administration of justice in the Member States justifies the assessment by the court of one Member State that all conditions for issuing a European order for payment are fulfilled to enable the order to be enforced in all other Member States without judicial review of the proper application of minimum procedural standards in the Member State where the order is to be enforced.
Vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodje držav članic utemeljuje presojo sodišča ene države članice, da so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za izdajo evropskega plačilnega naloga ter da se nalog lahko izvrši v vseh drugih državah članicah brez sodnega nadzora pravilne uporabe minimalnih postopkovnih standardov v državi članici, kjer se zahteva izvršba.
Without prejudice to the provisions of this Regulation, in particular the minimum standards laid down in Article 22(1) and (2) and Article 23, the procedures for the enforcement of the European order for payment should continue to be governed by national law.
Brez poseganja v določbe te uredbe, zlasti v minimalne standarde, določene v členu 22(1) in (2) ter v členu 23, bi moralo postopke za izvršbo evropskega plačilnega naloga še naprej urejati nacionalno pravo.
For the purposes of calculating time limits, Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits [4] should apply.
Za štetje rokov bi se morala uporabljati Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov [4].
The defendant should be advised of this and should be informed that account will be taken of the public holidays of the Member State in which the court issuing the European order for payment is situated.
Toženo stranko bi bilo treba o tem poučiti in jo obvestiti, da se bodo upoštevali dela prosti dnevi v državi članici, katere sodišče je izdalo evropski plačilni nalog.
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to establish a uniform rapid and efficient mechanism for the recovery of uncontested pecuniary claims throughout the European Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of the Regulation, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te uredbe, in sicer oblikovanja enotnega in učinkovitega mehanizma za izterjavo nespornih denarnih zahtevkov v celotni Evropski uniji, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker te cilje zaradi obsega in učinkov te uredbe lažje doseže Skupnost, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenih ciljev.
The United Kingdom and Ireland, in accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, have given notice of their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sta v skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, priloženega k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, predložili uradno obvestilo, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te uredbe.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation, and is not bound by it or subject to its application,
Danska v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, priloženega k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ne sodeluje pri sprejetju te uredbe, ki zanjo ni zavezujoča in se v njej ne uporablja –
to simplify, speed up and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure;
z uvedbo postopka za evropski plačilni nalog poenostaviti, pospešiti in zmanjšati stroške sodnih postopkov v čezmejnih zadevah v zvezi z nespornimi denarnimi zahtevki;
to permit the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout the Member States by laying down minimum standards, compliance with which renders unnecessary any intermediate proceedings in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement.
dopustiti prosti pretok evropskih plačilnih nalogov v vseh državah članicah z določitvijo minimalnih standardov, katerih spoštovanje povzroči, da postanejo nepotrebni vsi vmesni postopki, ki bi jih bilo treba opraviti v državi članici izvršbe pred priznanjem in izvršbo.
This Regulation shall not prevent a claimant from pursuing a claim within the meaning of Article 4 by making use of another procedure available under the law of a Member State or under Community law.
Ta uredba tožeči stranki ne preprečuje, da bi vložila zahtevek v smislu člena 4 v okviru nekega drugega postopka v skladu s pravom ene od držav članic ali s pravom Skupnosti.
This Regulation shall apply to civil and commercial matters in cross-border cases, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Ta uredba se uporablja v čezmejnih civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, ne glede na vrsto sodišča.
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters or the liability of the State for acts and omissions in the exercise of State authority (‘acta iure imperii’).
Ne uporablja pa se zlasti za davčne, carinske ali upravne zadeve ali za odgovornost države za dejanja in opustitve dejanj pri izvajanju javne oblasti („acta iure imperii“).
rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship, wills and succession;
premoženjska razmerja med zakoncema, oporoke in dedovanja;