natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The anti-dumping proceeding was initiated, pursuant to Article 5 of the basic Regulation, following a complaint lodged on 11th April 2005 by the Committee of Industrial Ethanol Producers of the European Union (the ‘complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 30 %, of the Community production of ethyl alcohol.
Protidampinški postopek je bil v skladu s členom 5 osnovne uredbe začet zaradi pritožbe, ki jo je 11. aprila 2005 v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež proizvodnje etilnega alkohola v Skupnosti, v tem primeru več kakor 30 %, vložil Odbor proizvajalcev industrijskega etanola Evropske unije („pritožnik“).
The complaint contained prima facie evidence of the existence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze prima facie o dampingu zadevnega izdelka in dokaze o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za uvedbo postopka.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers in Guatemala and Pakistan, importers/traders, suppliers and users known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting countries concerned, the complainant and all other known Community producers of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike v Gvatemali in Pakistanu, uvoznike/trgovce, dobavitelje in uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic, pritožnika in vse druge znane proizvajalce Skupnosti.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation and questionnaires were sent to all parties concerned.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, ki je naveden v obvestilu o začetku postopka, vsem zadevnim strankam pa so bili poslani tudi vprašalniki.
By a letter dated 31st January 2006 and addressed to the Commission, the complainant formally withdrew its complaint.
Pritožnik je v pismu Komisiji z dne 31. januarja 2006 uradno umaknil svojo pritožbo.
According to the complainant, this withdrawal was prompted by the recent significant change in the Generalised System of Preferences on ethyl alcohol originating in Pakistan.
Pritožnik je pojasnil, da je umik spodbudila nedavna bistvena sprememba v splošnem sistemu tarifnih preferencialov za etilni alkohol s poreklom iz Pakistana.
According to the complainant, though this has not eliminated dumping practices, it has helped to significantly curb the large and injurious volumes of imports from Pakistan into the Community.
Čeprav to ni odpravilo izvajanja dampinga, je po mnenju pritožnika pripomoglo v veliki meri obvladati ogromne in škodljive količine uvoza iz Pakistana v Skupnost.
As the injury data in the complaint was based on the combined effect of imports from Guatemala and Pakistan, the complainant believed that the withdrawal of the complaint with regard to both countries is a reasonable course of action at the present time.
Ker so podatki o škodi v pritožbi temeljili na skupnem učinku uvoza iz Gvatemale in Pakistana, je pritožnik menil, da je primerno umakniti pritožbo v zvezi z obema državama.
In accordance with Article 9(1) of the basic Regulation, the proceeding may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn unless such termination would not be in the Community interest.
V skladu s členom 9(1) osnovne uredbe se postopek lahko ustavi, kadar je pritožba umaknjena, razen kadar takšna ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission considered that the present proceeding should be terminated since the investigation had not brought to light any consideration showing that such termination would not be in the Community interest.
Komisija je bila mnenja, da je treba sedanji postopek ustaviti, saj v preiskavi ni prišlo do nobenih ugotovitev, iz katerih bi bilo razvidno, da takšna ustavitev ne bi bila v interesu Skupnosti.
However, no comments which could alter this decision were received.
Vendar ni prispela nobena pripomba, ki bi to odločitev lahko spremenila.
The Commission therefore concludes that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of ethyl alcohol originating in Guatemala and Pakistan should be terminated without the imposition of anti-dumping measures,
Komisija zato ugotavlja, da je treba protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom etilnega alkohola s poreklom iz Gvatemale v Skupnost ustaviti brez uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of ethyl alcohol, whether denatured or undenatured, having an alcoholic strength by volume of 80 % vol or higher, originating in Guatemala and Pakistan, normally declared under CN codes 22071000 and ex22072000 is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek glede uvoza etilnega alkohola, denaturiranega ali nedenaturiranega, z vsebnostjo alkohola 80 vol. % ali več, s poreklom iz Gvatemale in Pakistana, običajno uvrščenega pod oznaki KN 22071000 in ex22072000, se ustavi.
Done at Brussels, 25 April 2006.
V Bruslju, 25. aprila 2006
OJ C 129, 26.5.2005, p. 22.
UL C 129, 26.5.2005, str. 22.
concerning the non-inclusion of methabenzthiazuron in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance
o nevključitvi metabenztiazurona v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo to aktivno snov
(notified under document number C(2006) 1653)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1653)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/20/EC [2], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1], kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/20/ES [2], in zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 8(2) Direktive,
Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I of that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS določa, da lahko država članica v 12 letih od notifikacije navedene direktive registrira za dajanje v promet fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, ki niso uvrščene v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, in so že v prometu dve leti po datumu notifikacije, medtem ko se te snovi postopno preučujejo v okviru programa dela.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1490/2002 [3] določa podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge in tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
For active substances for which a notifier fails to fulfil its obligations under these Regulations no completeness check or evaluation of the dossier shall be performed.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere prijavitelj ne izpolni svojih obveznosti v skladu z navedenimi uredbami, se ne opravi pregled popolnosti ali ocena dokumentacije.
For methabenzthiazuron no complete dossier has been submitted within the prescribed time limit.
Za metabenztiazuron ni bila predložena popolna dokumentacija v predpisanem roku.
As a consequence, this active substance should not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and Member States should withdraw all authorisations for plant protection products containing this substance.
Zaradi tega se navedena aktivna snov ne bi smela vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS in države članice bi morale odvzeti vse registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo to snov.
For the active substances for which there is only a short period of advance notice for the withdrawal of plant protection products containing such substances, it is reasonable to provide for a period of grace for disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks for a period no longer than twelve months to allow existing stocks to be used in no more than one further growing.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere je rok predhodnega obvestila o umiku fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo take snovi, kratek, je smiselno predvideti podaljšanje roka za odstranitev, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog za obdobje, ki ni daljše od dvanajstih mesecev zato, da se obstoječe zaloge ne uporabljajo dlje kakor v enem nadaljnjem rastnem obdobju.
For methabenzthiazuron information has been presented and evaluated by the Commission together with Member State experts which has shown a need for further use of the substance concerned.
Za metabentiazuron je Komisija skupaj s strokovnjaki držav članic predstavila in ocenila podatke, in ki so pokazali potrebo po nadaljnji uporabi zadevne snovi.
In such cases temporary measures should be provided for to enable the development of alternatives.
V takih primerih je treba predvideti začasne ukrepe, da bi omogočili razvoj drugih možnosti.
Methabenzthiazuron shall not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Metabenztiazuron se ne vključi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Authorisations for plant protection products containing methabenzthiazuron are withdrawn by 25 October 2006;
registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstev, ki vsebujejo metabenztiazuron se prekličejo do 25. oktobra 2006;
From 26 April 2006 no authorisations for plant protection products containing methabenzthiazuron are granted or renewed under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
od dne 26. aprila 2006 se ne odobrijo ali podaljšajo registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo metabenztiazuron, v skladu z odstopanjem od člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
By derogation from Article 2, a Member State listed in column B of the Annex may maintain authorisations for plant protection products containing substances listed in column A for uses listed in column C of that Annex until 30 June 2009 at the latest.
Z odstopanjem od člena 2 lahko država članica, navedena v stolpcu B Priloge, obdrži registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo snovi, navedene v stolpcu A, za vrste uporabe, navedene v stolpcu C navedene priloge, najpozneje do 30. junija 2009.
such plant protection products remaining on the market after 25 October 2006 are relabelled in order to match the restricted use conditions;
taka fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki ostanejo na trgu po 25. oktobru 2006, se ponovno označijo, tako da ustrezajo pogojem za omejeno uporabo;
all appropriate risk mitigation measures are imposed to reduce any possible risks;
uvedejo se vsi ustrezni ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja z namenom zmanjšanja vseh morebitnih tveganj;
alternatives for such uses are being seriously sought.
resno se iščejo druge možnosti za take vrste uporabe.
The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission about the measures taken in application of paragraph 1, and in particular about the actions taken pursuant to points (a) to (d), by 31 December of each year.
Najkasneje do 31. decembra 2006 vsako leto zadevna država članica obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, izvedenih na podlagi odstavka 1, in zlasti o ukrepih, izvedenih v skladu s točkami (a) do (d).
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible.
Kakršno koli podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu s členom 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, mora biti čim krajše.
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 2 by 25 October 2006 at the latest, the period shall expire on 25 October 2007 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 2 najkasneje do 25. oktobra 2006, takrat rok poteče najkasneje z dne 25. oktobra 2007.
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 3(1) by 30 June 2009 at the latest, the period shall expire on 31 December 2009 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 3(1) najkasneje do 30. junija 2009, takrat rok poteče najkasneje 31. decembra 2009.
Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1044/2003 of 18 June 2003 (OJ L 151, 19.6.2003, p. 32).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1044/2003 z dne 18. junija 2003 (UL L 151, 19.6.2003, str. 32).
List of authorisations referred to in Article 3(1)
Seznam registracij iz člena 3(1)
Leek, peas
Por, grah
Allium crops
Pridelek luka
Forage grasses
Trava za krmo
Leguminous crops
Pridelek stročnic
A Member State making use of the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall ensure that the following conditions are complied with:
Država članica, ki upošteva odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka, zagotovi, da se izpolnijo naslednji pogoji:
the continued use is only accepted so far as it has no harmful effects on human or animal health and no unacceptable influence on the environment;
nadaljnja uporaba je sprejemljiva le, kadar nima škodljivih posledic za zdravje ljudi ali živali in nima nesprejemljivega vpliva na okolje;
of 26 April 2006
z dne 26. aprila 2006
(notified under document number C(2006) 1716)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1716)
Commission Decision 2006/274/EC of 6 April 2006 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and repealing Decision 2006/254/EC [2] was adopted in order to maintain and extend the measures taken by Germany pursuant to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever [3].
Odločba Komisije 2006/274/ES z dne 6. aprila 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v Nemčiji in razveljavitvi Odločbe 2006/254/ES [2] je bila sprejeta, da se ohranijo in razširijo ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Nemčija v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2001/89/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad klasično prašičjo kugo [3].
On the basis of epidemiological information provided by Germany, certain rules for the movement of pigs from and within the different areas of Germany should be amended.
Na podlagi epidemioloških podatkov, ki jih je zagotovila Nemčija, je treba spremeniti nekatera pravila za premike prašičev iz in znotraj različnih območij Nemčije.
Decision 2006/274/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2006/274/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 2006/274/EC is amended as follows:
V členu 1 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
In Article 1, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
V členu 1 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Germany may authorise:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 Nemčija lahko dovoli:
the direct transport of slaughter pigs to a slaughterhouse outside Germany for immediate slaughter, provided that the vehicles used for transport of pigs comply with the requirements in Article 6(2)(a) and that the pigs originate from one single holding that is situated outside the areas listed in Annex I;
neposredni prevoz klavnih prašičev za takojšni zakol v klavnico zunaj Nemčije pod pogojem, da vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz prašičev, izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 6(2)(a) in da prašiči izvirajo z enega samega gospodarstva, ki je zunaj območij iz Priloge I;
the transport of breeding and production pigs to a holding outside Germany, provided that the vehicles used for transport of pigs comply with the requirements in Article 6(2)(a) and that the pigs have been resident for at least 45 days, or since birth if less than 45 days of age, on a single holding:
prevoz plemenskih prašičev in pitancev na gospodarstvo zunaj Nemčije pod pogojem, da vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz prašičev, izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 6(2)(a) in da so prašiči najmanj 45 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 45 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
which is situated outside the areas listed in Annex I;
ki je zunaj območij iz Priloge I;
which has not received live pigs during the 45-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch of the pigs;
na katero v 45 dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem prašičev niso bili sprejeti živi prašiči;
on which the clinical examination carried out in accordance with Chapter IV(D)(2) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC have been completed with negative results.’
na katerem so bili rezultati kliničnega pregleda, opravljenega v skladu s poglavjem IV(D)(2) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES, negativni.“
without prejudice to the measures provided for in Directive 2001/89/EC, and in particular Articles 9, 10 and 11 thereof:
brez poseganja v ukrepe iz Direktive 2001/89/ES in zlasti člene 9, 10 in 11 Direktive:
no pigs are transported from and to holdings within the areas listed in Annex I(A);
se prašiči ne prevažajo z gospodarstev in na gospodarstva, ki se nahajajo znotraj območij iz Priloge I(A);
transport of slaughter pigs coming from holdings situated outside the areas listed in Annex I(A) to slaughterhouses located within those areas and transit of pigs through those areas is only allowed:
se prevoz prašičev za zakol z gospodarstev izven območij iz Priloge I(A) v klavnice na navedenih območjih in premiki prašičev čez omenjena območja dovolijo samo:
via major roads or railways, and
po glavnih cestah ali železnici in
in accordance with the detailed instructions provided for by the competent authority to prevent the pigs in question coming into direct or indirect contact with other pigs during transport.
v skladu s podrobnimi navodili, ki jih zagotovi pristojni organ, da se med prevozom prepreči neposreden ali posreden stik zadevnih prašičev z drugimi prašiči.
no pigs are dispatched from the areas listed in Annex I(B) to other areas within Germany, except for direct transport of:
prašiči se ne odpošiljajo z območij iz Priloge I(B) na druga območja znotraj Nemčije, razen za neposredni prevoz:
slaughter pigs to a slaughterhouse for immediate slaughter, provided that the pigs originate from one single holding;
klavnih prašičev za takojšni zakol v klavnico pod pogojem, da prašiči izvirajo z enega samega gospodarstva;
breeding and production pigs to a holding, provided that the pigs have been resident for at least 45 days, or since birth if less than 45 days of age, on a single holding:
plemenskih prašičev in pitancev na gospodarstvo pod pogojem, da so prašiči najmanj 45 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 45 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
which has not received live pigs during the 45-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch of the pigs; and
na katero v 45 dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem prašičev niso bili sprejeti živi prašiči; in
on which the clinical examination carried out in accordance with Chapter IV(D)(2) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC have been completed with negative results.
na katerem so bili rezultati kliničnega pregleda, opravljenega v skladu s poglavjem IV(D)(2) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES, negativni.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1(a) the competent authority may authorise the transport of pigs from a holding situated within the areas listed in Annex I(A) but outside a protection or surveillance zone:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1(a) lahko pristojni organ dovoli prevoz prašičev z gospodarstva, ki je na območju iz Priloge I(A), vendar zunaj okuženega ali ogroženega območja:
directly to a slaughterhouse situated within those areas, or in exceptional cases, to designated slaughterhouses in Germany located outside those areas, for immediate slaughter, provided that the pigs are dispatched from a holding on which the clinical examination carried out in accordance with Chapter IV(D)(3) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC have been completed with negative results.
neposredno v klavnico, ki je na navedenih območjih, ali, v izjemnih primerih, za takojšni zakol v posebej določene klavnice v Nemčiji, ki so zunaj navedenih območij, pod pogojem, da se prašiči odpošiljajo z gospodarstva, na katerem so bili rezultati kliničnega pregleda, opravljenega v skladu s poglavjem IV(D)(3) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES, negativni;
to a holding situated within those areas, provided that the pigs have been resident for at least 45 days, or since birth if less than 45 days of age, on a single holding which:
na gospodarstvo znotraj navedenih območij, pod pogojem, da so prašiči najmanj 45 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 45 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
has not received live pigs during the 45-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch of the pigs;
na katero v 45 dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem prašičev niso bili sprejeti živi prašiči;
By way derogation from paragraph 1(a) the competent authority may authorise the direct transport of pigs from a holding situated within a surveillance zone to a designated holding in which no pigs are present and which is situated within the same surveillance zone ‘or protection zone it surrounds’, provided that:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1(a) lahko pristojni organ dovoli neposreden prevoz prašičev z gospodarstva na ogroženem območju na posebej določeno gospodarstvo, na katerem ni prašičev in ki je na istem ogroženem območju, ‚ali je v bližini okuženo območje‘, pod pogojem:
the examinations provided for in Chapter IV(D)(2) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC have been completed with negative results on the holding from which the pigs are dispatched.
da so bili rezultati preiskav za gospodarstvo, na katero se odpošiljajo prašiči, opravljenih v skladu s poglavjem IV(D)(2) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES, negativni.
The German authorities shall record the above movements and inform immediately the Commission thereof in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health’.
Nemški organi evidentirajo zgoraj navedene premike in o tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.“
Germany shall ensure that no consignments of the following commodities are dispatched to other member States and to third countries:
Nemčija zagotovi, da se v druge države članice in v tretje države ne odpošiljajo pošiljke s:
porcine semen, unless the semen originates from boars kept at a collection centre referred to in Article 3(a) of Directive 90/429/EEC and situated outside the areas listed in Annex I(A);
semenom prašičev, razen če seme izvira od plemenjakov, ki so v osemenjevalnem središču iz člena 3(a) Direktive 90/429/EGS, ki je zunaj območij iz Priloge I(A);
ova and embryos of swine, unless the ova and embryos originate from swine kept at a holding situated outside the areas listed in Annex I(A).’
jajčnimi celicami in zarodki prašičev, razen če jajčne celice in zarodki izvirajo od prašičev, ki so na gospodarstvu zunaj območij iz Priloge I(A).“
In Article 5, points 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
Točki 1 in 2 člena 5 se nadomestita z naslednjim besedilom: