natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Signature of the authority issuing the certificate and/or its representative certifying the content of the certificate as accurate:
Podpis organa, ki izdaja potrdilo in/ali njegovega zastopnika, ki potrjuje točnost vsebine potrdila:
Post held (title/grade):
Delovno mesto (naziv/položaj):
Official stamp (if available):
Uradni pečat (če obstaja):
is liable to confiscation resulting from the application in the issuing State of any of the extended powers of confiscation specified in Article 3(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA,
ga je treba zapleniti zaradi uporabe katere koli razširjene pristojnosti zaplembe v državi izdajateljici po členu 3(1) in (2) okvirnega sklepa 2005/212/PNZ;
where it is considered necessary to have the confiscation order or parts thereof translated at the expense of the executing State, for the time necessary to obtain its translation, or
kadar menijo, da je treba odredbo ali del odredbe prevesti na stroške države izvršiteljice, za toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno za prevod; ali
two or more confiscation orders concerning an amount of money, which have been issued against the same natural or legal person, and the person concerned does not have sufficient means in the executing State to enable all the orders to be executed,
dve ali več odredb o zaplembi denarnih zneskov, ki so bile izdane proti isti fizični ali pravni osebi in zadevna oseba nima zadostnih sredstev v državi izvršiteljici, ki bi omogočili izvršitev vseh odredb,
the specific item(s) of property is(are) located in the executing State.
se določen del premoženja nahaja v državi izvršiteljici.
(See point (i))
Glej točko (i).
Where the confiscation of the specific item(s) of property involves action in more than one executing State, description of the action to be taken:
Kadar odredba o zaplembi dela premoženja zahteva ukrepanje v več kot eni državi izvršiteljici, opis ukrepov, ki jih je treba izvesti:
The Court has decided that the property (tick the relevant box(es)):
Sodišče je sklenilo, da je premoženje (označite ustrezno okence (-a)):
The property concerned has not been frozen under Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence.
Zadevno premoženje ni bilo predmet ukrepov za zamrznitev na podlagi Okvirnega sklepa 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvršbi odredb o zamrznitvi premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji.
The value of the property which may be confiscated in the issuing State and any one executing State is not likely to be sufficient for the execution of the full amount covered by the confiscation order.
Vrednost premoženja, ki se lahko zaseže v državi izdajateljici in v katerikoli državi izvršiteljici, verjetno ni zadostna za izvršbo celotnega zneska, ki ga zajema odredba o zaplembi.
Other reason(s) (to be specified):
Drug(-i) razlog(-i) (pojasnite):
Registered Seat in the executing State:
Statutarni sedež registracije v državi izvršiteljici:
constitutes the instrumentalities of such an offence, or
predstavlja predmete za izvršitev takšne kršitve;
the specific item(s) of property is (are) located in the executing State.
se deli premoženja nahajajo v državi izvršiteljici.
(See point (i)).
Glej točko (i).
computer-related crime, environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties,
kazniva dejanja zoper okolje, vključno z nedovoljenim prometom z ogroženimi živalskimi vrstami ter z ogroženimi rastlinskimi vrstami in sortami,
Registration number (if available) (1): Registered seat (if available) (1):
Sedež registracije (če je na voljo)) (1):
computer related crime; environmental crime, including illicit trafficking in endangered animal species and in endangered plant species and varieties;
kazniva dejanja zoper okolje, vključno z nedovoljenim prometom z ogroženimi živalskimi vrstami in ogroženimi rastlinskimi vrstami in sortami;
Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2006/960/PNZ
on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union
o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 30(1)(a) and (b) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 30(1)(a) in(b) in 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Sweden,
ob upoštevanju pobude Kraljevine Švedske,
One of the core objectives of the European Union is to provide its citizens with a high level of security within an area of freedom, security and justice.
Eden od temeljnih ciljev Evropske unije je svojim državljanom zagotoviti visoko stopnjo varnosti v območju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
That objective is to be achieved by preventing and combating crime through closer cooperation between law enforcement authorities in the Member States, while respecting the principles and rules relating to human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law on which the Union is founded and which are common to the Member States.
Ta cilj je treba doseči s preprečevanjem kaznivih dejanj in bojem proti njih prek tesnejšega sodelovanja med organi kazenskega pregona v državah članicah ob hkratnem spoštovanju načel in pravil v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami, temeljnimi svoboščinami in pravno državo, na katerih temelji Unija in so skupna državam članicam.
Exchange of information and intelligence on crime and criminal activities is the basis for law enforcement cooperation in the Union serving the overall objective of improving the safety of the Union's citizens.
Izmenjava informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov o kaznivih dejanjih in kriminalnih dejavnostih je temelj sodelovanja na področju kazenskega pregona v Uniji, ki služi splošnemu cilju izboljšanja varnosti državljanov Unije.
The timely access to accurate and up to date information and intelligence is a crucial element for the possibility of law enforcement authorities to successfully detect, prevent and investigate crime or criminal activity, in particular within an area where internal border controls have been abolished.
Pravočasen dostop do točnih in najnovejših informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov je ključni element, ki organom kazenskega pregona omogoča uspešno odkrivanje, preprečevanje in preiskovanje kaznivega dejanja ali kriminalne dejavnosti, zlasti na območju, na katerem je bil odpravljen nadzor notranjih meja.
As the activities of criminals are carried out clandestinely, they need to be controlled, and information relating to them needs to be exchanged particularly expeditiously.
Ker se dejavnosti kriminalcev izvajajo tajno, jih je treba nadzirati, z njimi povezane informacije pa je treba še posebej hitro izmenjati.
It is important that the possibilities for law enforcement authorities to obtain information and intelligence concerning serious crime and terrorist acts from other Member States be viewed horizontally and not in terms of differences with regard to type of crime or division of competencies between law enforcement or judicial authorities.
Pomembno je, da se možnosti organov kazenskega pregona, da od drugih držav članic pridobijo informacije in obveščevalne podatke o hudih kaznivih dejanjih in terorističnih dejanjih, obravnavajo na horizontalnem nivoju in ne na ravni razlik glede vrste kaznivih dejanj ali delitve pristojnosti med organi kazenskega pregona in sodnimi organi.
Currently, effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities is seriously hampered by formal procedures, administrative structures and legal obstacles laid down in Member States' legislation; such a state of affairs is unacceptable to the citizens of the European Union and it therefore calls for greater security and more efficient law enforcement while protecting human rights.
Učinkovito in hitro izmenjavo informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona trenutno resno ovirajo uradni postopki, upravne strukture in pravne ovire v zakonodajah držav članic; takšne razmere so za državljane Evropske unije nesprejemljive, in za to zahtevajo večjo varnost in učinkovitejši kazenski pregon ob hkratnem varovanju človekovih pravic.
It is necessary for law enforcement authorities to be able to request and obtain information and intelligence from other Member States at different stages of investigation, from the phase of gathering criminal intelligence to the phase of criminal investigation.
Nujno je, da lahko organi kazenskega pregona zaprosijo za informacije in obveščevalne podatke in te pridobijo od drugih držav članic v različnih fazah preiskave, od faze zbiranja obveščevalnih podatkov o kaznivem dejanju do faze preiskave kaznivega dejanja.
The Member State's systems are different in that respect, but this Framework Decision does not purport to change these systems.
Sistemi držav članic so si v tem pogledu različni, toda namen tega okvirnega sklepa ni spreminjati teh sistemov.
However, it seeks, as regards certain types of information and intelligence, to ensure that certain information vital for law enforcement authorities is exchanged expeditiously within the Union.
Njegov namen je, da glede določenih vrst informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov znotraj Unije zagotovi hitro izmenjavo nekaterih informacij, ki so bistvenega pomena za organe kazenskega pregona.
The absence of a common legal framework for the effective and expeditious exchange of information and intelligence between the law enforcement authorities of the Member States is a deficiency that will have to be remedied; the Council of the European Union therefore deems it necessary to adopt a legally binding instrument on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence.
Odsotnost skupnega pravnega okvira za učinkovito in hitro izmenjavo informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic je pomanjkljivost, ki jo bo treba odpraviti; Svet Evropske unije zato meni, da je treba sprejeti pravno zavezujoč instrument o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov.
This Framework Decision should not affect existing or future instruments which allow the objectives of this Framework Decision to be extended or which facilitate the procedures for exchanging information and intelligence, such as the Convention of 18 December 1997 drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union on Mutual Assistance and Cooperation between Customs Administrations [1].
Ta okvirni sklep ne bi smel vplivati na obstoječe ali prihodnje instrumente, ki omogočajo razširitev ciljev tega okvirnega sklepa ali ki poenostavljajo postopke za izmenjavo informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov, kot je Konvencija z dne 18. decembra 1997, pripravljena na podlagi člena K.3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, o medsebojni pomoči in sodelovanju med carinskimi upravami [1].
As regards the exchange of information, this Framework Decision is without prejudice to essential national security interests, the jeopardizing of the success of a current investigation or the safety of individuals, or specific intelligence activities in the field of State security.
Glede izmenjave informacij ta okvirni sklep ne posega v bistvene interese nacionalne varnosti in ne ogroža uspešnega poteka tekoče preiskave, varnosti posameznikov ali posebnih obveščevalnih dejavnosti na področju državne varnosti.
It is important to promote the exchange of information as widely as possible, in particular in relation to offences linked directly or indirectly to organised crime and terrorism, and in a way which does not detract from the required level of cooperation between Member States under existing arrangements.
Pomembno je spodbujati čim širšo izmenjavo informacij, zlasti glede kaznivih dejanj, ki so neposredno ali posredno povezana z organiziranim kriminalom in terorizmom, ter na način, ki ne znižuje zahtevane stopnje sodelovanja med državami članicami v okviru obstoječih ureditev.
The common interest of Member States in fighting crime of a cross-border nature must strike the appropriate balance between fast and efficient law enforcement cooperation and agreed principles and rules on data protection, fundamental freedoms, human rights and individual liberties.
Skupni interes držav članic v boju proti čezmejnemu kriminalu mora vzpostaviti ustrezno ravnovesje med hitrim in učinkovitim sodelovanjem pri kazenskem pregonu ter dogovorjenimi načeli in pravili o varstvu podatkov, temeljnih svoboščinah, človekovih pravicah in osebnih svoboščinah.
In the Declaration on combating terrorism as adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 25 March 2004, the European Council instructed the Council to examine measures for simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States.
Evropski svet v Izjavi o boju proti terorizmu, ki jo je sprejel na zasedanju Evropskega sveta 25. marca 2004, Svetu naroča, da preuči ukrepe za poenostavitev izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic.
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Framework Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in Article 1 of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [2].
Za Islandijo in Norveško ta okvirni sklep predstavlja razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda, ki spadajo v področje iz člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo Sporazuma, sklenjenega med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško, v zvezi s pridružitvijo teh dveh držav k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [2].
The procedures set out in that Agreement have been followed in respect of this Framework Decision.
Postopki iz tega sporazuma so bili upoštevani pri tem okvirnem sklepu.
As regards Switzerland, this Framework Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the association of the Swiss Confederation with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1(H) of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/860/EC [3] on the signing on behalf of the European Community and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Agreement, and with Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/849/EC [4] on the signing on behalf of the European Union, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Agreement,
Kar zadeva Švico, predstavlja ta okvirni sklep razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma, podpisanega med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo v zvezi s pridružitvijo Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, ki spadajo v področje iz člena 1(H) Sklepa 1999/437/ES v povezavi s členom 4(1) Sklepa Sveta 2004/860/ES z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o podpisu v imenu Evropske Skupnosti in začasni uporabi nekaterih določb navedenega Sporazuma [3], in s členom 4(1) Sklepa Sveta 2004/849/ES z dne 25. oktobra 2004 o podpisu v imenu Evropske unije in o začasni uporabi nekaterih določb navedenega Sporazuma [4].
SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
PODROČJE UPORABE IN OPREDELITVE POJMOV
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish the rules under which Member States' law enforcement authorities may exchange existing information and intelligence effectively and expeditiously for the purpose of conducting criminal investigations or criminal intelligence operations.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je oblikovati pravila, po katerih lahko organi kazenskega pregona držav članic učinkovito in hitro izmenjujejo obstoječe informacije in obveščevalne podatke zaradi vodenja preiskav kaznivih dejanj ali operacij zbiranja obveščevalnih podatkov o kaznivih dejanjih.
This Framework Decision shall be without prejudice to bilateral or multilateral agreements or arrangements between Member States and third countries and to instruments of the European Union on mutual legal assistance or mutual recognition of decisions regarding criminal matters, including any conditions set by third countries concerning the use of information once supplied.
Ta okvirni sklep ne posega v dvostranske ali večstranske sporazume ali ureditve med državami članicami in tretjimi državami ter instrumente Evropske unije o medsebojni pravni pomoči ali vzajemnem priznavanju odločb v kazenskih zadevah, vključno z vsemi pogoji, ki jih tretje države postavijo v zvezi s posredovanimi informacijami.
This Framework Decision covers all information and/or intelligence as defined in Article 2(d).
Ta okvirni sklep zajema vse informacije in/ali obveščevalne podatke, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 2(d).
It does not impose any obligation on the part of the Member States to gather and store information and intelligence for the purpose of providing it to the competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States.
Držav članic ne zavezuje, da zbirajo in shranjujejo informacije in obveščevalne podatke z namenom njihovega posredovanja pristojnim organom kazenskega pregona drugih držav članic.
This Framework Decision does not impose any obligation on the part of the Member States to provide information and intelligence to be used as evidence before a judicial authority nor does it give any right to use such information or intelligence for that purpose.
Ta okvirni sklep držav članic ne zavezuje, da zagotovijo informacije in obveščevalne podatke, ki naj bi bili uporabljeni kot dokaz pred sodnimi organi, niti jim ne daje pravice do uporabe teh informacij ali obveščevalnih podatkov v ta namen.
Where a Member State has obtained information or intelligence in accordance with this Framework Decision, and wishes to use it as evidence before a judicial authority, it has to obtain consent of the Member State that provided the information or intelligence, where necessary under the national law of the Member State that provided the information or intelligence, through the use of instruments regarding judicial cooperation in force between the Member States.
Kadar država članica pridobi informacije ali obveščevalne podatke v skladu s tem okvirnim sklepom in jih želi uporabiti kot dokaz pred sodnimi organi, mora pridobiti soglasje države članice, ki je te informacije ali obveščevalne podatke priskrbela, če tako zahteva nacionalna zakonodaja države članice, ki je priskrbela informacije ali obveščevalne podatke, in sicer z uporabo instrumentov o pravosodnem sodelovanju, ki veljajo med državama članicama.
Such consent is not required where the requested Member State has already given its consent for the use of information or intelligence as evidence at the time of transmittal of the information or intelligence.
Soglasje ni potrebno, če je država članica, od katere so se zahtevale informacije ali obveščevalni podatki, že dala soglasje za uporabo informacij ali obveščevalnih podatkov kot dokaza ob njihovem posredovanju.
This Framework Decision does not impose any obligation to obtain any information or intelligence by means of coercive measures, defined in accordance with national law, in the Member State receiving the request for information or intelligence.
Ta okvirni sklep ne zavezuje k pridobivanju kakršnih koli informacij ali obveščevalnih podatkov v državi članici, ki je prejela zaprosilo za informacije ali obveščevalne podatke, z uporabo prisilnih ukrepov, opredeljenih v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
Member States shall, where permitted by and in accordance with their national law, provide information or intelligence previously obtained by means of coercive measures.
Če to dovoljuje nacionalna zakonodaja, države članice v skladu s slednjo zagotovijo informacije ali obveščevalne podatke, ki so jih predhodno pridobile z uporabo prisilnih ukrepov.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and any obligations incumbent on law enforcement authorities in this respect shall remain unaffected.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, prav tako pa ostanejo nespremenjene tudi vse obveznosti organov kazenskega pregona v zvezi s tem.
‘competent law enforcement authority’: a national police, customs or other authority that is authorised by national law to detect, prevent and investigate offences or criminal activities and to exercise authority and take coercive measures in the context of such activities.
„pristojni organ kazenskega pregona“ pomeni državno policijo, carino ali drug organ, ki mu nacionalna zakonodaja daje pooblastila za odkrivanje, preprečevanje in preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj ali kriminalnih dejavnosti ter za izvajanje pooblastil in uporabo prisilnih ukrepov v okviru takšnih dejavnosti.
Agencies or units dealing especially with national security issues are not covered by the concept of competent law enforcement authority.
Agencije ali enote, ki se ukvarjajo posebej z vprašanji državne varnosti, niso zajete v pojem pristojnega organa kazenskega pregona.
Every Member State shall, by 18 December 2007, state in a declaration deposited with the General Secretariat of the Council which authorities are covered by the concept of ‘competent law enforcement authority’.
Vsaka država članica do 18 decembra 2007 v izjavi, deponirani pri generalnem sekretariatu Sveta, navede, kateri organi so zajeti s pojmom „pristojni organ kazenskega pregona“.
Such a declaration may be modified at any time.
Takšna izjava se lahko kadar koli spremeni;
‘criminal investigation’: a procedural stage within which measures are taken by competent law enforcement or judicial authorities, including public prosecutors, with a view to establishing and identifying facts, suspects and circumstances regarding one or several identified concrete criminal acts;
„preiskava kaznivega dejanja“: pomeni stopnjo v postopku, znotraj katere pristojni organi kazenskega pregona ali sodni organi, vključno z državnimi tožilci, izvajajo ukrepe za ugotovitev in pojasnitev dejstev, osumljencev in okoliščin enega ali več ugotovljenih konkretnih kaznivih dejanj;
‘criminal intelligence operation’: a procedural stage, not yet having reached the stage of a criminal investigation, within which a competent law enforcement authority is entitled by national law to collect, process and analyse information about crime or criminal activities with a view to establishing whether concrete criminal acts have been committed or may be committed in the future;
„operacija zbiranja obveščevalnih podatkov o kaznivem dejanju“: pomeni stopnjo v postopku, ki še ni dosegla stopnje preiskave kaznivega dejanja, znotraj katere pristojni organ kazenskega pregona, ki je po nacionalni zakonodaji pristojen za zbiranje, obdelovanje in analizo informacij o kaznivih dejanjih in kriminalnih dejavnostih, ugotavlja, ali so bila storjena oziroma bi lahko bila v prihodnosti storjena konkretna kazniva dejanja;
‘information and/or intelligence’:
„informacije in/ali obveščevalni podatki“ pomenijo:
any type of information or data which is held by law enforcement authorities;
kakršne koli informacije ali podatke, ki jih imajo organi kazenskega pregona;
any type of information or data which is held by public authorities or by private entities and which is available to law enforcement authorities without the taking of coercive measures, in accordance with Article 1(5).
kakršne koli informacije ali podatke, ki jih imajo organi oblasti ali zasebni subjekti, in s katerimi razpolagajo organi kazenskega pregona, ne da bi izvajali prisilne ukrepe v skladu s členom 1(5).