natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Another element influencing consumer perception is certainly the fact that there is a much higher turnover of children's shoes than of other footwear, because of children's physical development.
Še en dejavnik, ki vpliva na dojemanje potrošnika, je gotovo dejstvo, da je se zaradi otrokovega telesnega razvoja otroški čevlji zamenjajo precej pogosteje kot druga obutev.
On examination, at this stage of the proceeding, the arguments for and against the inclusion of children's shoes in the definition of the product concerned do not yet allow for a definitive conclusion.
Po proučitvi na tej stopnji postopka končni sklep na podlagi utemeljitev za vključitev otroških čevljev v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka in proti njej še ni mogoč.
Therefore, the Commission decided to provisionally treat children's shoes as forming part of the product concerned, pending further investigation and consideration at the definitive stage.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da bo otroške čevlje začasno obravnavala kot del zadevnega izdelka in bo počakala na nadaljnjo preiskavo in obravnavo v zaključni fazi.
Other claims
Drugi zahtevki
It was also claimed that the product definition is too broad to be considered one single product, since it includes many different styles, materials and levels of quality, and that all those various types should be analysed individually by various proceedings.
Trdilo se je tudi, da je opredelitev izdelka preširoka, da bi se lahko štel za en izdelek, saj vključuje več različnih oblik, materialov in ravni kakovosti ter da je treba narediti individualno analizo vseh teh različnih vrst izdelkov z različnimi postopki.
This claim is based on the fact that the product definition covers 33 different CN codes, thus allegedly giving an indication that many different products are covered, and that the various types of footwear have different characteristics, end-uses, production processes and are sold via different sales channels.
Ta zahtevek temelji na dejstvu, da zajema opredelitev izdelka 33 različnih oznak KN, kar domnevno kaže, da je zajetih več različnih izdelkov in da ima več vrst obutve različne lastnosti, končno uporabo, proizvodne postopke in se prodaja po različnih prodajnih poteh.
The number of different CN codes covered by the product definition is, as such, also irrelevant for the question as to whether a product definition is broad or narrow.
Število različnih oznak KN, ki jih zajema opredelitev izdelka, kot tako ni pomembno za vprašanje, ali je opredelitev izdelka široka ali ne.
The relevant criteria applied in order to determine whether or not the product, subject of an investigation, can be considered a single product, i.e. its basic physical and technical characteristics, are set out in detail above.
Ustrezna merila, ki se uporabljajo za ugotovitev, ali se lahko izdelek, ki je predmet preiskave, šteje za en izdelek ali ne, tj. njegove osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti, so podrobno določena zgoraj.
Furthermore, even though the various types of footwear may indeed have different specific characteristics, the investigation showed that, with the exception of STAF, their basic characteristics however remain identical.
Čeprav lahko imajo različne vrste obutve različne posebne lastnosti, pa je preiskava pokazala, da ostajajo osnovne lastnosti, razen pri obutvi STAF, enake.
In addition, the fact that the product concerned can be produced by using different processes is not in itself a criterion which could result in a finding of two or more distinct products.
Tudi dejstvo, da se lahko zadevni izdelek proizvaja z uporabo različnih postopkov, samo po sebi ni merilo, s katerim bi lahko dokazali obstoj dveh ali več različnih izdelkov.
Finally, the investigation also revealed that the various types of the product concerned were generally sold via the same sales channels.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da so se različne vrste zadevnega izdelka na splošno prodajale po enakih prodajnih poteh.
While some specialised shops may focus on certain specific types, the vast majority of the distributors (retailers, department stores, supermarkets) sell all various types of footwear, in order to offer a wide choice range to their customers.
Medtem ko se nekatere specializirane prodajalne osredotočajo na določene posebne vrste, pa večina distributerjev (prodajalci na drobno, veleblagovnice, supermarketi) prodaja različne vrste obutve, da lahko svojim potrošnikom ponudijo široko paleto.
Lastly, certain importers argued that the scope of the product, as defined in the notice of initiation, is even broader than the product definition given by the complainants themselves, which was allegedly limited to only three types of footwear.
Nekateri uvozniki so trdili, da je obseg izdelka, kot je opredeljeno v obvestilu o začetku, celo širši kot opredelitev izdelka, ki so jo predložili sami pritožniki, ta je bila namreč domnevno omejena le na tri vrste obutve.
In this respect, it is pointed out that the definition of the like product set out in the notice of initiation is exactly the same definition given in the complaint.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti dejstvo, da opredelitev podobnega izdelka, navedena v obvestilu o začetku, natančno odraža opredelitev, navedeno v pritožbi.
The three types of footwear to which it referred were given for illustrative purposes only.
Tri vrste obutve, na katero se pritožba nanaša, so navedene le zaradi ponazoritve.
The complaint clearly indicates that those three types represent the large majority of the imports from the countries concerned (more than 50 %).
Pritožba resnično jasno kaže, da navedene tri vrste predstavljajo večino uvoza iz zadevnih držav (več kot 50 %).
This can certainly not be understood as a limitation of the scope of the proceeding to only those three types.
To vsekakor ni mogoče razumeti kot omejevanje obsega postopka na le te tri vrste izdelka.
In view of the above, the claims that the product definition is too broad were rejected.
Glede na zgoraj omenjene prvine so bile trditve, da je opredelitev izdelka preširoka, zavrnjene.
All the remaining footwear types, i.e. all leather uppers footwear excluding STAF, although they cover a wide range of styles and types, their essential characteristics, their uses and consumer perception remain basically the same.
Bistvene lastnosti, uporaba in potrošnikovo dojemanje preostale vrste obutve, tj. vse obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, razen obutve STAF, ostajajo dejansko enake, čeprav zajemajo široko paleto oblik in vrst.
In addition to the fact that they share the same basic physical and technical characteristics, all those various styles and types are in direct competition and to a very large extent interchangeable.
Poleg dejstva, da imajo enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti, si vse te različne oblike in vrste neposredno konkurirajo in so v veliki meri zamenljive.
This is clearly illustrated by the fact that there are no clear dividing lines between the various types, i.e. there is quite some overlapping and competition between adjoining types.
To dobro kaže dejstvo, da ni jasnih ločnic med različnimi vrstami, tj. da prihaja do prekrivanj in konkurence med podobnimi vrstami.
In conclusion, for the purposes of this proceeding and in accordance with consistent Community practice, it is therefore considered that all types of the product described above, with the exception of STAF, should be regarded as forming one single product.
Za namene tega postopka in v skladu z običajno prakso Skupnosti se zato šteje, da so vse vrste zgoraj opisanega izdelka, razen obutve STAF, en sam izdelek.
The product concerned is footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, as described above, originating in PRC and in Vietnam.
Zadevni izdelek je obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja, kot je opisano zgoraj, s poreklom iz LRK in Vietnama.
The investigation has shown, as mentioned above, that all types of footwear with uppers of leather despite the differences in terms of type and style, have the same basic physical and technical characteristics, i.e. outdoor footwear with uppers of leather, they are basically used for the same purposes, and can be regarded as different types of the same product.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je preiskava pokazala, da imajo vse vrste obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja, čeprav so drugačnih vrst in oblik, enake osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti, tj. obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja, ki ni hišna obutev, se dejansko uporablja za iste namene in se lahko šteje kot različna vrsta enakega izdelka.
Therefore, for the purpose of this investigation the product concerned is footwear with uppers of leather, as described in the ‘General’ part above, originating in PRC and Vietnam (the product concerned).
Za namen te preiskave je zato zadevni izdelek obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja s poreklom iz LRK in Vietnama („zadevni izdelek“), kot je opisan v poglavju „Splošno“ zgoraj.
This product is currently classifiable within the following CN codes: ex64032000, ex64033000, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000.
Ta izdelek je trenutno uvrščen pod naslednje oznake KN: ex64032000, ex64033000, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 in ex64051000.
It should be noted that until 1 January 2005, the products originating in PRC and falling within the above CN codes were subject to a quantitative quota, with the exception of the products falling within CN codes 64032000 and ex64033000, and those footwear used for sporting activities and involving a special technology.
Treba je opomniti, da so do 1. januarja 2005 za izdelke s poreklom iz LRK, ki se uvrščajo pod zgoraj navedene oznake KN, veljale količinske kvote, razen za izdelke, ki se uvrščajo po oznaki KN 64032000 in ex64033000, ter tisto obutve, ki se uporablja za športne aktivnosti in je izdelana po posebni tehnologiji.
It is therefore concluded that, for the purpose of the present anti-dumping proceeding, all types of the product concerned are regarded as one product.
Zato se sklene, da se za namen tega protidampinškega postopka vse vrste zadevnega izdelka štejejo za en izdelek.
The investigation showed that the product concerned and the footwear with uppers of leather manufactured and sold domestically in PRC and Vietnam as well as footwear with uppers of leather produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry were similar as far as their basic physical and technical characteristics and uses are concerned, and that they are perceived by users as being interchangeable.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so zadevni izdelek in obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja, izdelana in prodana na domačem trgu v LRK in Vietnamu, ter obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti izdelala in prodala v Skupnosti, podobni, kar zadeva njihove osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti ter uporabo, in da so za uporabnike zamenljivi.
Certain interested parties argued that footwear with uppers of leather produced by the Community industry and sold on the Community market was not similar to the product concerned.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja, ki jo je izdelala in prodala industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, ni podobna zadevnemu izdelku.
They claimed that this is evidenced in particular by differences between products in terms of quality, consumer perceptions, channels of sales and segmentation.
Trdile so, da to zlasti dokazujejo razlike v kakovosti, dojemanju potrošnikov, prodajnih poteh in segmentaciji.
It was further claimed that the consumers in the Community usually perceive the product concerned as being a cheaper product and that those products do not benefit from any brand premium.
Trdile so tudi, da potrošniki v Skupnosti običajno zadevni izdelek dojemajo kot cenejši izdelek in da navedeni izdelki nimajo prednosti blagovnih znamk.
The investigation revealed contradictory statements by importers in that respect.
Preiskava je pokazala, da si navedbe uvoznikov v zvezi s tem nasprotujejo.
While some claimed that the product concerned is usually of inferior quality and remains in a different price category compared to Community made products, others claimed that brand footwear manufactured in the countries concerned is imported at higher prices, probably of mediocre quality, imported at an extremely low price, from those same countries.
Medtem ko so nekateri trdili, da je zadevni izdelek običajno nižje kakovosti in ostaja v drugačnem cenovnem razredu kot izdelki, izdelani v Skupnosti, so drugi trdili, da se obutev blagovnih znamk, izdelana v zadevnih državah, uvaža po cenah, ki so višje od izredno nizke cene in predvidoma tudi nizke kakovosti uvoza iz istih zadevnih držav.
On the other hand, the investigation confirmed that in the Community both, low and high quality footwear are manufactured and sold via the same distribution channels as the product concerned, i.e. independent retailers, non-specialised supermarkets, department stores, etc.
Po drugi strani pa je preiskava potrdila, da se v Skupnosti izdeluje tako obutev visoke in nizke kakovosti in se prodaja po enakih distribucijskih poteh (tj. neodvisni prodajalci na drobno, nespecializirani supermarketi, veleblagovnice itd.) kot zadevni izdelek.
In addition, footwear does not necessarily indicate its country of origin, and it is therefore often very difficult for the consumer to make the distinction between footwear manufactured in the countries concerned and Community made products.
Poleg tega pri obutvi ni nujno navedena država porekla in je zato pogosto za potrošnika zelo težko razlikovati med obutvijo, izdelano v zadevnih državah, in tisto, izdelano v Skupnosti.
For those reasons, it is considered that, whatever its origin, footwear produced in the countries concerned and in the Community compete at all levels of the market and are not subject to different consumer perceptions.
Zato se šteje, da si obutev, izdelana v zadevnih državah, in tista, izdelana v Skupnosti, ne glede na poreklo med seboj konkurirata na vseh ravneh trga in jih potrošnik ne dojema drugače.
While there may be some minor differences between the product concerned and Community production, it is considered that these differences do not affect the substantial basic characteristics, properties and uses of the product.
Ker lahko obstaja nekaj manjših razlik med zadevnim izdelkom in proizvodnjo Skupnosti, se šteje, da te razlike ne vplivajo na bistvene osnovne lastnosti in uporabo izdelka.
Likewise, no major differences were found between the product concerned and footwear with uppers of leather produced and sold both by the exporters/producers on their domestic market and sold by producers in Brazil, which served as an analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value for those companies that were not granted market economy treatment.
Prav tako ni bilo ugotovljenih večjih razlik med zadevnim izdelkom in obutvijo z zgornjim delom iz usnja, ki so jo izdelali in prodali izvozniki/proizvajalci na svojem notranjem trgu in tisto, ki so jo prodali proizvajalci v Braziliji, torej v državi, ki je v namen določitve normalne vrednosti za tiste družbe, ki jim tržnogospodarska obravnava ni bila odobrena, predstavljala primerljivo državo.
In view of the above, it is provisionally concluded that, in accordance with Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation, and for the purpose of this investigation, all types of footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather produced and sold in the countries concerned and in Brazil and those produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market are alike to those exported from the countries concerned to the Community.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se začasno sklene, da so v skladu s členom 1(4) osnovne uredbe in za namen te preiskave vse vrste obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja, izdelane in prodane v zadevnih državah in v Braziliji ter tista, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti izdelala in prodala na trgu Skupnosti, podobne tisti obutvi, ki je izvožena iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost.
Sampling for exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam
Vzorčenje za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in Vietnamu
In view of the large number of exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na veliko število znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Vietnamu je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za ugotavljanje dampinga predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers were requested to make themselves known within 15 days from the date of the initiation of the investigation and to provide basic information on their export and domestic sales, their precise activities with regard to the production of the product concerned and the names and activities of all their related companies involved in the production and/or selling of the product concerned.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki pozvani, da se javijo v 15 dneh od začetka preiskave in posredujejo osnovne informacije o svojem izvozu in domači prodaji, natančnih dejavnostih v zvezi s proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka in o imenih in dejavnostih vseh njihovih povezanih družb, vključenih v proizvodnjo in/ali prodajo zadevnega izdelka.
The authorities in the PRC and Vietnam were also consulted.
O tem so bili obveščeni tudi organi v LRK in Vietnamu.
Preselection of cooperating exporting producers
Predizbira sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov
Some 163 companies in the PRC and 86 companies in Vietnam came forward and provided the requested information within the given deadline set in the notice of initiation.
Javilo se je 163 družb v LRK in 86 družb v Vietnamu in v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, predložilo zahtevane informacije.
However, only 154 Chinese exporting producers and 81 Vietnamese exporting producers reported exports to the Community during the investigation period.
Vendar je le 154 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in 81 vietnamskih v obdobju preiskave prijavilo izvoz v Skupnost.
Those exporting producers that exported the product concerned to the Community during the investigation period and expressed a wish to participate in the sample, were initially considered as cooperating companies and were taken into account in the selection of the sample.
Tisti proizvajalci izvozniki, ki so v obdobju preiskave izvažali zadevni izdelek v Skupnost in izrazili željo, da bi sodelovali v vzorcu, so se na začetku šteli kot sodelujoče družbe in so bili upoštevani pri izbiri vzorca.
Exporting producers which did not make themselves known within the aforesaid period or did not provide the requested information in due time, were considered as non-cooperating with the investigation.
Za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki se niso javili v prej omenjenem roku ali niso pravočasno predložili zahtevanih informacij, se je štelo, da ne sodelujejo pri preiskavi.
In the case of the PRC, a sample of the four largest exporting producers was originally considered in line with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
V primeru LRK se je prvotno štelo, da je vzorec štirih največjih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
This would have allowed a limited investigation and still be reasonably representative.
To bi omogočilo omejitev preiskav s še vedno ustrezno stopnjo reprezentativnosti.
However, in the course of the consultation process with the interested parties, represented in this case by the Chinese authorities and the respective Chinese producers' association, the Chinese authorities insisted that more companies be added to the list in order to increase the representative level of the sample.
Vendar so med postopkom posvetovanj z zainteresiranimi strankami, ki so jih v tem primeru predstavljali kitajski organi in združenje kitajskih proizvajalcev, kitajski organi vztrajali, da se na seznam vključi več družb in se tako poveča stopnja reprezentativnosti vzorca.
Consequently, the sample was significantly extended to 13 Chinese exporting producers, representing over 20 % of the Chinese export volume to the Community.
Zato je bil vzorec znatno razširjen, in sicer na 13 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki predstavljajo 20 % obsega kitajskega izvoza v Skupnost.
The Chinese authorities gave their full agreement to the sample chosen.
Kitajski organi so se v celoti strinjali z izbranim vzorcem.
In the case of Vietnam, a sample of the four largest exporting producers was also originally considered in line with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation.
V primeru Vietnama se je prvotno štelo, da je vzorec štirih največjih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, given the request made by the Chinese authorities to increase the representative level of the sample of Chinese exporters, and in order not to have samples significantly different inrepresentative terms for the two countries concerned, it was decided to also increase the size of the sample of the Vietnamese exporters to eight companies.
Vendar je bilo glede na zahtevo kitajskih organov, da je treba povečati stopnjo reprezentativnosti vzorca kitajskih izvoznikov in da se vzorci v smislu reprezentativnost za ti dve zadevni družbi ne bi bistveno razlikovali, sklenjeno, da se razširi tudi vzorec vietnamskih izvoznikov, in sicer na osem družb.
At the end of the discussion process with the Vietnamese authorities, which were in contact with the Vietnamese association of producers, full agreement was reached with those authorities on a sample of eight companies in Vietnam.
Ob koncu postopka posvetovanj z vietnamskimi organi, ki so bili v stiku z vietnamskim združenjem proizvajalcev, je bil dosežen poln dogovor z navedenimi organi glede vzorca osmih vietnamskih družb.
In accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the following criteria were taken into account in the selection of the sample:
V skladu s členom 17(1) osnovne uredbe so se pri izbiri vzorca upoštevala naslednji merili:
size of exporting producer with regard to export sales to the Community,
velikost proizvajalca izvoznika glede izvoza v Skupnost,
size of exporting producer with regard to domestic sales.
velikost proizvajalca izvoznika glede domače prodaje.
Regarding the second criteria above, it was considered essential to include in the sample, some companies with domestic sales in order to have as representative a cross-section of the footwear industry in the samples as possible.
Kar zadeva drugo zgoraj navedeno merilo, se je zdelo pomembno v vzorec vključiti nekatere družbe z domačo prodajo, da bi dobili kolikor je mogoče reprezentativen prerez obutvene industrije v vzorcih.
This was necessary, in particular, to have information available, in the event that some or all exporters in the samples would fulfil the MET criteria, on prices and costs associated with producing and selling the product concerned on the domestic markets of the countries concerned.
To je bilo potrebno zlasti, da bi bile na razpolago informacije o cenah in stroških, povezanih s proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka na domačem trgu zadevnih držav, v primeru, da bi nekateri ali vsi v vzorec vključeni izvozniki izpolnjevali merila za TGO.
Therefore, only the major exporting companies which also represented a major part of the domestic sales have been selected.
Zato so bile izbrane le glavne družbe izvoznice, ki so tudi predstavljale večji del domače prodaje.