natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
See point 9 of the letter initiating the procedure.
Glej točko 9 dopisa o sprožitvi postopka.
OJ L 91, 6.4.1990, p. 1.
UL L 91 z dne 6. 4. 1990, str. 1.
Point 3.6 of the guidelines lays down that ‘aid which is granted retrospectively in respect of activities which have already been undertaken by the beneficiary cannot be considered to contain the necessary incentive element, and must be considered to constitute operating aid which is simply intended to relieve the beneficiary of a financial burden.
Točka 3.6 smernic določa, da „pomoč, odobrena z retroaktivnim učinkom, za dejavnosti, ki jih je upravičenec že začel izvajati, ne vsebuje potrebne spodbude in se zato šteje kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, saj je njen edini namen lajšanje finančne obveznosti upravičenca.
Except in the case of aid schemes which are compensatory in nature, all aid schemes should therefore provide that no aid may be granted in respect of work begun or activities undertaken before an application for aid has been properly submitted to the competent authority concerned.’
V vseh shemah pomoči, razen pri kompenzacijah, je zato treba prepovedati dodeljevanje pomoči za že začeta dela ali za dejavnosti, začete preden je bila prošnja za pomoč ustrezno vložena pri pristojnem organu.“
Decisions of 28 November 2000, SG(2000) D/108799 (Aid N 226/2000), 13 March 2001, SG(2001) D 286857 (Aid N 729/a/2000), 28 February 2001 SG(2001) D/286508 and 4 August 2000, SG(2000) D/105958.
Odločbe z dne 28 novembra 2000, SG(2000) D/108799 (Pomoč N 226/2000), z dne 13. marca 2001, SG(2001) D/286857 (Pomoč N 729/a/2000), z dne 28. februarja 2001 SG(2001) D/286508 in z dne 4. avgusta 2000, SG(2000) D/105958.
Article 11 of the Law lays down that ‘initiatives forming part of a business plan … may be implemented before the decision to grant aid is adopted provided that they are begun after submission of the aid application…’.
Člen 11 navedenega zakona določa, „da se lahko pobude, vključene v načrt podjetja, izvedejo tudi pred postopkom odobritve pomoči pod pogojem, da se začnejo izvajati za tem, ko je bila vložena prošnja za pridobitev zadevne pomoči …“.
Aid N 63/2001 and aid N 24/2001.
Pomoč N 63/2001 in pomoč N 24/2001.
Joined Chambers of the Court of Cassation 500/1999.
Kasacijsko sodišče združeni oddelki 500/1999.
OJ L 108, 25.4.1997, p. 9.
UL L 108 z dne 25. 4. 1997, str. 9.
Most recent data available from Eurostat, which are from 2003 and therefore refer to the EU-15.
Zadnji razpoložljivi podatki Evrostata iz leta 2003 za EU-15.
OJ L 1, 1.1.2004, p. 1.
UL L 1, 1.1.2004.
The Commission has previously so ruled with regard to Aid 715/1999, letter SG(2000) D/105754 dated 2 August 2000.
Komisija je tako odločila že pri pomoči N 715/1999, dopisi SG (2000) D/105754 z dne 2. avgusta 2000.
This is stipulated in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2004, see footnote 20.
Tako določa člen 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2004, glej opombo 20.
OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
UL L 140 z dne 30.4.2004, str. 1.
The budget of ITL 5 billion or EUR 2,5 million announced by the regional authorities would be sufficient to finance only a small part of the expenditure already incurred by the potential beneficiaries (around ITL 70 billion or EUR 35 million). The Commission cannot therefore understand why the Italian authorities stated that ‘the capital grant will not exceed verified eligible expenditure’, since, on the basis of the information available to the Commission, the aid intensity would be less than 10 %.
Razpoložljiva sredstva, ki jih je objavila dežela Benečija, in sicer v višini 5 milijard ITL = 2,5 milijona EUR, bi zadostovala za financiranje samo dela stroškov, ki so jih porabili potencialni upravičenci (približno 70 milijard ITL = 35 milijonov EUR); zato ni jasno, zakaj so italijanski organi navedli, da „denarni prispevek ne bo presegel potrjenih upravičenih stroškov“ glede na to, da je po podatkih, ki jih ima na voljo Komisija, intenzivnost pomoči manjša od 10 %.
The Italian authorities simply supplied a copy of a letter (dated 1o April 1999) from the authorities of the Region of Veneto acknowledging the receipt by an office (responsible for structural measures in the agrifood sector) of an application from a potential beneficiary for the purposes of the usual technico-administrative enquiry. This communication is compulsory under the law on the publication of official acts (see footnote 6).
Italijanski organi so samo posredovali kopijo dopisa (z dne 1. aprila 1999) uprave Benečije, s katerim je potencialnega upravičenca obvestila, da je določen urad (odgovoren za strukturne intervencije v živilskopredelovalnem sektorju) prejel njegovo prošnjo v običajni tehničen in upravni pregled, se pravi obvestilo, ki je obvezno po Zakonu o preglednosti aktov javne uprave (glej opombo 6).
Decision of the Regional Government No 4202 of 1993 lays down that applications must be submitted to the regional authorities by 31 January and 30 September each year. The ranking list of applications submitted is then drawn up and the authorities must notify those applicants whose applications have been rejected because they fail to fulfil the requirements laid down.
Sklep Deželnega odbora št. 4202 iz leta 1993 določa, da se prošnje predložijo Deželnemu odboru vsako leto do 31. januarja in do 30. septembra; nato se sestavi prednostni seznam in obvestijo vse prosilce, katerih prošnje so bile zavrnjene zaradi neizpolnjevanja zahtev.
They state that the sum made available (ITL 5 billion, or around EUR 2,5 million) is to be used so as to ensure a significant contribution, i.e. 30 % of the investments eligible for aid, which total ITL 15 billion, or around EUR 7,5 million. This total for eligible investments is purely hypothetical, since a technical re-evaluation of projects has to be carried out, as have a new analysis of projects, a new verification of the eligibility of applicants, a new calculation of the investment volume, etc. The re-examination will be carried out when there are definite prospects for financing so as not to cause potential beneficiaries any further problems.
Izplačana vsota (5 milijard LIT oziroma približno 2,5 milijona EUR) bi se uporabila tako, da bi ohranila pomembno vlogo ukrepa, tj. 30 % vrednosti upravičenih naložb, kar znaša 15 milijard LIT oziroma približno 7,5 milijona EUR. Navedena vrednost upravičenih naložb je zgolj teoretična, saj se bodo projekti znova tehnično in drugače pregledali, znova se bo preverila upravičenost podjetij do financiranja in na novo določile vrednosti naložb itn. … Taka ponovna preučitev bi se opravila pri konkretnih možnostih financiranja, da se ne bi dodatno obremenila podjetja, ki so potencialni upravičenci do pomoči.
on the State Aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for the establishment of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
o državni pomoči, ki jo namerava Združeno kraljestvo izvajati za ustanovitev Organa za jedrsko razgradnjo
(notified under document number C(2006) 650)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 650)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi, in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 19 December 2003, registered by the Commission on 22 December 2003, the United Kingdom notified the Commission of the State aid implications of the draft law setting up the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), hereinafter ‘the Measure’.
V dopisu z dne 19. decembra 2003, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 22. decembra 2003, je Združeno kraljestvo uradno obvestilo Komisijo o posledicah, ki jih bo imel osnutek zakona o ustanovitvi Organa za jedrsko razgradnjo (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, NDA), v nadaljevanju „ukrep“, za državno pomoč.
By letter D/51248 of 20 February 2004, the Commission asked questions on the Measure.
V dopisu D/51248 z dne 20. februarja 2004 je Komisija zastavila vprašanja glede ukrepa.
The United Kingdom replied by letter dated 29 March 2004, registered by the Commission on 15 April 2004.
Združeno kraljestvo je odgovorilo z dopisom z dne 29. marca 2004, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 15. aprila 2004.
By letter D/54319 of 16 June 2004, the Commission asked further questions on the Measure.
V dopisu D/54319 z dne 16. junija 2004 je Komisija zastavila nadaljnja vprašanja glede ukrepa.
The United Kingdom replied by letter dated 14 July 2004, registered by the Commission on 19 July 2004.
Združeno kraljestvo je odgovorilo z dopisom z dne 14. julija 2004, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 19. julija 2004.
The United Kingdom submitted additional information on the Measure by letter dated 10 September 2004, registered by the Commission on 14 September 2004, and by letter dated 14 October 2004, registered by the Commission on 19 October 2004.
V dopisu z dne 10. septembra 2004, ki ga je Komisije evidentirala 14. septembra 2004, in v dopisu z dne 14. oktobra 2004, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 19. oktobra 2004, je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo dodatne informacije o ukrepu.
By letter dated 1 December 2004, the Commission informed the United Kingdom that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
V dopisu z dne 1. decembra 2004 je Komisija obvestila Združeno kraljestvo, da se je odločila sprožiti postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES glede pomoči.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure (hereafter ‘the Opening of Procedure’) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži postopek preiskave (v nadaljnjem besedilu „sprožitev postopka“), je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission called upon interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe.
The United Kingdom provided the Commission with its comments on the Opening of Procedure by letter dated 31 January 2005, registered by the Commission on the same day.
V dopisu z dne 31. januarja 2005, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala istega dne, je Združeno kraljestvo Komisiji predložilo pripombe glede sprožitve postopka.
The Commission received comments from interested parties.
Komisija je prejela pripombe od zainteresiranih strank.
It forwarded them to the United Kingdom, which was given the opportunity to react.
Posredovala jih je Združenemu kraljestvu in mu dala možnost odgovora.
The United Kingdom's comments were received by letter dated 4 March 2005, registered by the Commission on 7 March 2005.
Združeno kraljestvo je posredovalo pripombe z dopisom z dne 4. marca 2005, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 7. marca 2005.
Meetings between the United Kingdom authorities and the Commission took place on 20 April, 25 August and 11 October 2005.
Sestanki med organi Združenega kraljestva in Komisijo so potekali 20. aprila, 25. avgusta in 11. oktobra 2005.
The United Kingdom submitted additional information on the Measure by letter dated 23 January 2006, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo dodatne informacije o ukrepu z dopisom z dne 23. januarja 2006, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala istega dne.
An amendment to this letter was sent by letter of 1 February 2006, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Ta dopis je bil spremenjen z dopisom z dne 1. februarja 2006, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala istega dne.
Further additional information on the Measure was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter of 7 February 2006, registered by the Commission on the same day.
Združeno kraljestvo je v dopisu z dne 7. februarja 2006, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala istega dne, predložilo dodatne informacije.
Further additional information was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter of 7 February 2006, registered by the Commission on 10 February 2006.
Združeno kraljestvo je v dopisu z dne 7. februarja 2006, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 10. februarja 2006, predložilo nadaljnje dodatne informacije.
Further additional information was submitted by the United Kingdom by letter dated 29 March 2006, registered by the Commission on 30 March 2006.
Združeno kraljestvo je v dopisu z dne 29. marca 2006, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 30. marca 2006, predložilo nadaljnje dodatne informacije.
The United Kingdom was one of the first countries worldwide to engage in nuclear technologies, both for civil and military purposes.
Združeno kraljestvo je bilo eno od prvih držav na svetu, ki se je začelo ukvarjati z jedrsko tehnologijo za civilne in tudi vojaške namene.
At the time these technologies were first introduced, the emphasis of the industry was on scientific improvements and on gains in efficiency.
Ko so se te tehnologije prvič začele uvajati, je bil poudarek industrije na znanstvenih izboljšavah in večji učinkovitosti.
The management of nuclear liabilities was generally not taken into consideration, or only in a very limited way.
Upravljanje jedrskih obveznosti se običajno ni upoštevalo ali se je upoštevalo v zelo omejenem obsegu.
The rising awareness of the need to ultimately decommission nuclear sites progressively resulted in funds being set aside for the management of nuclear liabilities.
Zaradi vse večje ozaveščenosti o potrebi po končni razgradnji jedrskih lokacij so se postopoma začela namenjati sredstva za upravljanje jedrskih obveznosti.
However, these funds were generally insufficient to face liabilities the estimated amount of which was still very uncertain, but growing.
Ta sredstva pa večinoma niso zadostovala za izpolnitev obveznosti, katerih ocenjeni znesek je bil še vedno zelo negotov, čeprav je nenehno naraščal.
Even at the end of the 20th century, the management of nuclear liabilities was still handled independently by each of their owners, and very much on a case by case basis.
Celo ob koncu 20. stoletja je vsak lastnik še vedno neodvisno upravljal svoje jedrske obveznosti, in sicer običajno od primera do primera.
The UK Government considered that this kind of management had reached its limits and that a new and more efficient method should be put in place in order for nuclear liabilities to be more efficiently handled, while preserving the highest level of safety.
Vlada združenega kraljestva je menila, da tako upravljanje ni več primerno in da je treba uvesti novo in učinkovitejšo metodo za učinkovitejše ravnanje z jedrskimi obveznostmi, pri čemer je treba ohraniti najvišjo raven varnosti.
In 2001, the United Kingdom Government decided to start a review of ways in which the management of public sector nuclear liabilities could be concentrated in the hands of a single public body.
Leta 2001 je vlada Združenega kraljestva sklenila proučiti, kako bi upravljanje jedrskih obveznosti v javnem sektorju lahko prešlo v pristojnost enega javnega organa.
A White Paper entitled Managing the Nuclear Legacy — A strategy for action was published in July 2002.
Julija leta 2002 je bila objavljena Bela knjiga z naslovom Upravljanje jedrske dediščine – strategija ukrepov.
After a consultation process, the ideas of the White Paper were implemented in legislation in the form of the 2004 Energy Act.
Po postopku posvetovanja so se zamisli iz Bele knjige vključile v zakonodajo v obliki Energetskega zakona iz leta 2004.
Under the provisions of this legislation, a new non-departmental public body, known as the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), was created.
V skladu z določbami navedene zakonodaje je bil oblikovan nov neresoren javni organ, znan kot Organ za jedrsko razgradnjo (Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, NDA).
The NDA will progressively be made responsible for the management of most public sector nuclear liabilities in the United Kingdom.
NDA bo postopoma prevzel odgovornost za upravljanje večine jedrskih obveznosti v javnem sektorju v Združenem kraljestvu.
For this purpose, the ownership of nuclear sites and assets will be transferred to the NDA.
V ta namen se bo lastništvo nad jedrskimi lokacijami in sredstvi preneslo na NDA.
Along with the ownership of the assets and sites, the NDA will take over the responsibility for the nuclear liabilities linked to them as well as all financial assets that are clearly attached to these sites.
NDA bo skupaj z lastništvom nad sredstvi in lokacijami prevzel tudi odgovornost za povezane jedrske obveznosti ter vsa finančna sredstva, ki so jasno povezana s temi lokacijami.
The management of nuclear liabilities in an efficient and safe way is the NDA's objective.
Cilj NDA je upravljanje jedrskih obveznosti na učinkovit in varen način.
The NDA can continue to operate the physical assets that are transferred to it if the continued operation of these assets covers more than their avoidable costs and therefore contributes to reducing the value of their liabilities.
NDA lahko še naprej upravlja opredmetena sredstva, ki so nanj prenesena, če nadaljnje upravljanje teh sredstev vključuje več, kot so njihovi izogibni stroški, in zato prispeva k zmanjšanju vrednosti obveznosti.
The continued operation of nuclear assets may similarly be contracted by the NDA.
NDA lahko podobno odda v izvedbo tudi nadaljnje upravljanje jedrskih sredstev.
Later on, they will be selected via competitive procedures, with a view to triggering the development of a real nuclear decommissioning and clean-up market.
Na začetku bodo SLC nekdanji lastniki lokacij, kasneje pa bodo izbrani prek razpisnih postopkov, z namenom spodbuditve razvoja resničnega trga za razgradnjo in čiščenje.
In order to fund its activities, the NDA uses the value of the transferred financial assets and the net revenues that the transferred physical assets generate.
Za financiranje svojih dejavnosti NDA uporablja vrednost prenesenih finančnih sredstev in čiste prihodke, ustvarjene s prenesenimi opredmetenimi sredstvi.
Since it is very likely that these resources will not be sufficient to pay for the entire costs of management of the nuclear liabilities, the State will finance the shortfall.
Ker je zelo verjetno, da ti viri ne bodo zadostovali za plačilo vseh stroškov upravljanja jedrskih obveznosti, bo država financirala primanjkljaj.
Assets belonging to the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency (UKAEA) have been transferred to the NDA.
Sredstva, ki pripadajo Agenciji Združenega kraljestva za atomsko energijo (United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, UKAEA), so se prenesla na NDA.
This aspect of the Measure has already been decided upon by the Commission in the decision referred to in recital (5) above.
Komisija je o tem vidiku ukrepa že sprejela odločitev, navedeno v dopisu iz uvodne izjave (5).
The Commission found that this aspect of the Measure did not include State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je ugotovila, da ta vidik ukrepa ne vključuje državne pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The NDA has also received assets belonging to British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL).
NDA je prejel tudi sredstva, ki so pripadala družbi British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL).
This aspect of the Measure is the object of the present decision.
Ta vidik ukrepa je predmet te odločbe.
It must be noted that transitional arrangements were put in place by the United Kingdom to ensure that, even though BNFL's assets were formally transferred to the NDA, no State aid is granted until the Commission takes a final decision on the case.
Poudariti je treba, da je Združeno kraljestvo uvedlo prehodne ureditve, da bi zagotovilo, da se kljub temu, da so sredstva BNFL uradno prenesena na NDA, državna pomoč ne dodeljuje, dokler Komisija ne sprejme končne odločitve o tem primeru.
BNFL is a publicly owned limited company that operates in many fields in the nuclear sector.
BNFL je družba z omejeno odgovornostjo v javni lasti, ki deluje na številnih področjih v sektorju jedrske energije.
It is present in nearly all steps of the nuclear fuel cycle: it enriches uranium (through Urenco), supplies nuclear fuel, generates electricity and manages spent nuclear fuel.
Prisotna je v skoraj vseh fazah jedrskega gorivnega cikla: obogatitvi urana (v okviru Urenco), dobavi jedrskega goriva, proizvodnji električne energije in ravnanju z izrabljenim jedrskim gorivom.
Most but not all of BNFL's nuclear activities and sites have been transferred to the NDA.
Na NDA so bile prenesene skoraj vse jedrske dejavnosti in lokacije družbe BNFL.
It has received:
NDA je prejel:
all Magnox electricity generation sites and the Mawntrog station;
vse elektrarne Magnox in elektrarno Mawntrog;
the Sellafield site, including in particular the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant (THORP) and the Sellafield Mox Plant (SMP).
lokacijo Sellafield, zlasti obrat za predelavo oksidnega goriva termičnih reaktorjev (Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant, THORP) in obrat za predelavo mešanega oksidnega goriva v Sellafieldu (Sellafield Mox Plant, SMP).
The Sellafield site also includes one of the Magnox plants referred to above (the Calder Hall station) and a small Combined Heat and Power plant (the Fellside plant);
Lokacija Sellafield vključuje tudi eno od zgoraj navedenih elektrarn Magnox (elektrarna Calder Hall) in majhno elektrarno za sočasno proizvodnjo toplotne in električne energije (elektrarna Fellside);
the Springfields site, which is dedicated to nuclear fuel manufacturing;
lokacijo Springfields, ki je namenjena proizvodnji jedrskega goriva;
the Drigg low level waste disposal site;
deponijo odpadkov z nizko stopnjo radioaktivnosti Drigg;
the Capenhurst site, the decommissioning of which is nearly completed, and which will eventually focus on the storage of uranium materials.
lokacijo Capenhurst, katerega razgradnja je že skoraj končana in ki bo namenjena skladiščenju uranovih materialov.
Together with the sites mentioned above, BNFL transfers to the NDA a number of financial assets linked to these sites, which were set up in the past to fund at least in part their decommissioning.
Skupaj z navedenimi lokacijami bo BNFL prenesel na NDA tudi določena finančna sredstva, povezana s temi lokacijami, ki so bila ustanovljena za vsaj delno financiranje njihove razgradnje.
These assets are:
Ta sredstva so:
the Nuclear Liabilities Investment Portfolio;
investicijski portfelj za jedrske obveznosti (Nuclear Liabilities Investment Portfolio);
the Magnox Undertaking;
zaveza Magnox (Magnox Undertaking);
other, more minor, contributions, including in particular the Springfields gilts, which are funds earmarked to cover decommissioning costs at the Springfields site.
drugi manjši prispevki, ki zajemajo zlasti državne obveznice za Springfields, ki so sredstva, namenjena kritju stroškov razgradnje lokacije Springfields.
Technically, these assets are not transferred directly to the NDA, but rather consolidated in a Government fund, the Nuclear Decommissioning Funding Account.
Tehnično ta sredstva niso prenesena neposredno na NDA, temveč so združena v državnem skladu, ki se imenuje Sklad za jedrsko razgradnjo.
The Government will in turn fund the NDA by grants.
Vlada bo NDA financirala s subvencijami.
In their notification, the UK authorities had provided the Commission with an estimate of the nuclear liabilities and assets that would be transferred to the NDA, together with a split of these amounts between the ones that originate from commercial activities and the ones that originate from non-commercial activities.
Organi Združenega kraljestva so v svojem uradnem obvestilu Komisiji posredovali oceno jedrskih obveznosti in sredstev, ki se bodo prenesla na NDA, skupaj s porazdelitvijo teh zneskov na zneske, ki izhajajo iz gospodarskih dejavnosti, in na zneske, ki izhajajo iz negospodarskih dejavnosti.
All liabilities linked to UKAEA sites were viewed as non-commercial in the Opening of Procedure.
Vse obveznosti, ki so povezane z lokacijami UKAEA, so se v sprožitvi postopka obravnavale, kot da izhajajo iz negospodarskih dejavnosti.