natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ‘necessity requirement’ for Anstaltslast does not apply to such a normal economic decision by the Land as joint owner of the bank.
„Zasilni predpis“ programa pomoči Anstaltslast pa ne velja za tako običajno ekonomsko odločitev dežele kot (so)lastnice.
Since there is no other existing aid scheme under Articles 87(1) and 88(1) of the EC Treaty, the capital injection ranks as new aid within the meaning of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty and must be investigated accordingly.
Ob odsotnosti drugega obstoječega programa pomoči v skladu s členoma 87(1) in 88(1) Pogodbe ES je treba vložek kapitala označiti kot novo pomoč v smislu členov 87(1) in 88(3) Pogodbe ter ustrezno preučiti.
The aid cannot be regarded as compatible either under Article 87(2) or (3) or under any other provision of the EC Treaty.
Pomoč se niti v skladu s členom 87(2) ali (3) niti v skladu s katero koli drugo določbo Pogodbe ES ne more obravnavati kot združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid is therefore declared incompatible with the common market and must be discontinued and the aid element of the measure illegally put into effect must be recovered by the German Government,
V skladu s tem se pomoč spozna za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom, se mora odpraviti, element pomoči nezakonitega ukrepa pa mora Nemčija zahtevati nazaj –
The state aid of €432,3 million which Germany granted to Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein Girozentrale, now HSH Nordbank AG, from 1 January 1999 to 31 May 2003 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 432,3 milijona EUR, ki jo je Nemčija v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1999 in 31. majem 2003 odobrila v korist Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein Girozentrale, zdaj HSH Nordbank AG, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the recipient the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlawfully made available to the recipient.
Nemčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da prejemnica vrne pomoč, navedeno v členu 1 in nezakonito dano na razpolago.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the recipient until the date of its recovery.
Znesek, ki se mora vrniti, vključuje obresti, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč prejemnici na razpolago, do dejanskega vračila.
Using the questionnaire set out in the Annex, Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to implement it.
Nemčija obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po objavi te odločbe z izpolnitvijo vprašalnika, prikazanega v Prilogi, o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe.
Brussels, 20 October 2004.
V Bruslju, 20.10.2004.
OJ C 76, 28.3.2003, p. 2.
UL C 76, 28.3.2003, str. 2.
ECR I-435.
[2003], ZOdl. II-435.
Norddeutsche Landesbank: OJ C 81, 4.4.2003, p. 2; Bayerische Landesbank: OJ C 81, 4.4.2003, p. 13; Hamburgische Landesbank: OJ C 81, 4.4.2003, p. 24; Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen: OJ C 73, 26.3.2003, p. 3.
Norddeutsche Landesbank: UL C 81, 4.4.2003, str. 2; Bayerische Landesbank: UL C 81, 4.4.2003, str. 13; Hamburgische Landesbank: UL C 81, 4.4.2003, str. 24; Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen: UL C 73, 26.3.2003, str. 3.
See its annual report for 1998, p. 1.
Glej njeno letno poročilo iz leta 1998, str. 1.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 84.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 84.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 89.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 89.
Confidential information.
Zaupen podatek.
Communication from Germany, 30 September 2004.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 30. september 2004.
Now the Federal Agency for the Supervision of Financial Services (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht — ‘BaFin’).
Sedaj Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht („BaFin“).
OJ L 386, 30.12.1989, p. 14; replaced by Directive 2001/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 126, 26.5.2000, p. 1).
UL L 386, 30.12.1989, str. 14; nadomeščena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/12/ES (UL L 126, 26.5.2000, str. 1).
In fact, the new own funds requirements should have entered into force on 1 January 1993; they were introduced late in Germany.
Dejansko bi morale nove zahteve po lastnem kapitalu začeti veljati že 1. januarja 1993, ampak so v Nemčije stopile v veljavo z zamudo.
Under the Solvency Directive, credit insitutions must have own funds equivalent to at least 8 % of their risk-adjusted assets, whereas the previous German legislation required a ratio of 5,6 %; however, this ratio was based on a narrower definition of own funds than that which has applied since the entry into force of the Own Funds Directive.
Kreditne institucije morajo po Direktivi o solventnosti razpolagati z lastnimi sredstvi v višini najmanj 8 % svoje tveganju prilagojene tehtane aktive, po stari nemški zakonodaji pa je bil zahtevan delež 5,6 %; ta delež je sicer temeljil na opredelitvi lastnih sredstev, ki je bila ožja od tiste, ki velja od začetka veljavnosti Direktive o lastnih virih sredstev.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 90.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 90.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 91.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 91.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 94.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 94.
See footnote 3; paragraph 64 of the Decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 3; odstavek 64.
Letter from BAKred, 25.5.99.
Pismo BAKred, 25. maj 1999.
Communication from Germany, 3.5.01, p. 2.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 3. maj 2001, str. 2.
Communications from Germany of 8 December 1999, p. 96, and 29 October 2003, p. 18.
Sporočili Nemčije, 8. december 1999, str. 96, in 29. oktober 2003, str. 18.
Communications from Germany, 14 April 2003 (Annex 1) and 30 September 2004.
Sporočili Nemčije, 14. april 2003, Priloga 1, in 30. september 2004.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 86.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8.december 1999, str. 86.
Communication from Germany, 8.12.99, p. 88.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 8.december 1999, str. 88.
Communication from Germany, 29.10.03, p. 2.
Sporočilo Nemčije, 29. oktober 2003, str. 2.
In LSH's annual report for 1990, values of between 8,8 % and over 9 % are mentioned (p. 28).
V poslovnem poročilu LSH za leto 1990 so na strani 28 navedene vrednosti med 8,8 % in več kot 9 %.
In the annual report for 1991, values for that year of between 8,4 % and 9,17 % are mentioned (page 27).
V poslovnem poročilu za leto 1991 so na strani 27 navedene vrednosti za to leto med 8,4 % in 9,17 %.
Since the transfer of WAK's and WKA's assets occurred on 1 January 1991, any agreement on a normal market remuneration would have been tailored to the normal returns for 1990.
Ker je bil prenos sredstev WAK in WKA opravljen 1. januarja 1991, bi se dogovor za običajno tržno nadomestilo opiral na običajne donose za leto 1990.
Moreover, a risk or liability premium was paid primarily because of the risk of loss in the event of insolvency.
Sicer se premija tveganja ali jamstva v prvi vrsti plačuje zaradi tveganja izgube v primeru insolventnosti.
To offset the effects of inflation, the rate of return on a long-term government bond should be determined for each transfer period, initially disregarding the inflation expectations.
Za izravnavo posledic inflacije je treba za vsako obdobje prenosa določiti stopnjo donosa na dolgoročne državne obveznice, sprva brez upoštevanja predvidene inflacije.
For the purposes of comparison, the BdB also gives the theoretical beta values calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which, as it indicates, differ very little from the empirically determined values.
BdB za namene primerjave navaja tudi teoretične beta vrednosti, izračunane z modelom vrednotenja dolgoročnih naložb (CAPM), ki se, kakor ugotavlja, le malo razlikujejo od empirično določenih vrednosti.
See footnote 4.
Glej sprotno opombo 4.
Although this communication deals expressly with manufacturing, the principle doubtless applies likewise to all other sectors of the economy.
V tem sporočilu gre sicer izključno za predelovalno industrijo, vendar se lahko načelo nedvomno na enak način uporablja v vseh drugih gospodarskih panogah.
See footnote 4; paragraphs 206 et seq. of the decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 4; odstavki 206 in dalje.
See footnote 3; paragraphs 161 et seq. of the decision
Glej sprotno opombo 3; odstavki 161in dalje.
See footnote 4; paragraphs 241 and 314 of the decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 4; odstavka 241, 314.
See footnote 4; paragraphs 320 and 335 of the decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 4; odstavka 320, 335.
Contrast this with the WestLB case, in which only part of the established cash value of the housing-promotion assets shown in the balance sheet as own funds was recognised as equity capital for supervisory purposes.
Zadevni primer se tako razlikuje od primera WestLB, v katerem je bil le del denarne vrednosti sredstev za pospeševanje gradnje stanovanj, določene in v bilanci stanja vknjižene kot lastna sredstva, za potrebe nadzorstva priznan kot lastni kapital.
See footnote 3; paragraph 19 of the decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 3; odstavek 19.
The situation does not change if one takes into account the possibility of raising additional own funds up to the same amount of original own funds (a factor of 25 instead of 12,5 for original own funds).
Položaj se ne spremeni, če upoštevamo možnost povečanja dodatnih lastnih sredstev do višine temeljnih sredstev (faktor 25 namesto 12,5 za temeljna sredstva).
As confirmed by the Court of First Instance, see footnote 4; paragraphs 321 to 331 of the decision.
Potrjeno s sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje, glej sprotno opombo 4; odstavki 321 do 331.
The parties use as a basis the risk-free interest rate calculated according to the REX10 Performance Index of Deustche Börse AG.
Stranke so pri tem uporabile netvegane temeljne obrestne mere, izračunane glede na indeks uspešnosti REX10 Performance Index nemške borze Deutsche Börse AG.
See footnote 3; paragraph 221 of the decision.
Glej sprotno opombo 3; odstavek 221.
After recognition by BAKred, i.e. for the last four months of 1991, it was also available for use to underpin competitive business.Since 1 January 1999, marks have been converted into euros at a rate of EUR1 = DEM 1,95583.
Po priznanju s strani BAKred, t.j. zadnje štiri mesece v letu 1991, se je lahko uporabljal tudi za kritje konkurenčnih dejavnosti.Po 1. januarju 1999 se nemške marke preračunavajo v eure po tečaju 1EUR = 1,95583 DEM.
Date(s) of paymento [1]
Datum izplačila [1]
(‘BdB’), an association representing private banks established in Germany, informed the Commission that, among other things, WKA and WAK, together with their entire assets, had been transferred to LSH with effect from 1 January 1991.
(„BdB“), združenje, ki predstavlja zasebne banke s sedežem v Nemčiji, je v pismih z dne 31. maja in 21. decembra 1994 Komisijo med drugim obvestilo o tem, da sta bili z dnem 1. januarja 1991 WKA in WAK skupaj s celotnimi sredstvi preneseni na LSH.
Moreover, since 1 January 1994 the Land had not increased but reduced its share of this increase in value.
Poleg tega dežela po 1. januarju 1994 ni povečala svojega deleža pri tem povečanju vrednosti, temveč celo zmanjšala.
The Commission therefore concluded in its decision to initiate the procedure that the measures in favour of LSH, which conducts business mainly at regional level but also operates nationally and internationally, constituted state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je zato v svojem Sklepu o sprožitvi postopka zaključila, da gre pri navedenih ukrepih v korist LSH, ki je dejavna predvsem na regionalni, a tudi na državni in mednarodni ravni, verjetno za državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
In the WestLB case, the Commission applied a deduction of around half as much, citing as justification the reduction in the bank's taxable income and the resulting lower level of corporation tax liability. This approach is said to be incorrect.
Približno pol manjši odbitek, ki ga je Komisija v postopku zoper WestLB utemeljila z zmanjšanjem obdavčljivega dohodka banke in s tem manjšo obremenitvijo z davkom od dobička pravnih oseb, naj bi bil napačen.
In material terms, the corporation tax payable on a standard investment is an advance payment on the investor's income or corporation tax.
Davek od dobička pravnih oseb pri običajni naložbi je v materialnem smislu predplačilo na davek od dohodka ali dobička vlagatelja.
This immediately excluded from any comparison non-voting preference shares, profit participation rights and perpetual preferred shares.
Pri primerjavi se torej takoj izključijo neglasovalne prednostne delnice, pravice za udeležbo pri dobičku in tako imenovane trajne prednostne delnice.
In Germany these three equity instruments are recognised not as core capital but as additional capital (‘tier 2 capital’).
Ti trije instrumenti lastnega kapitala v Nemčiji niso priznani kot temeljni kapital temveč kot dodatni kapital (kapital „razred 2“).
According to this definition, silent partnership contributions must be recognised for supervisory purposes as no more than lower tier 1 capital, which may account for no more than 15 % of the requisite core-capital ratio.
Po tej opredelitvi so vložki tihe družbe s strani bančnega nadzorstva priznane zgolj kot tako imenovani nižji kapital razreda 1.
In other words, where the core-capital ratio is 4 %, 3,4 % must be made up of nominal capital and open reserves (e.g. the special-purpose reserves transferred to the Landesbanks).
Ta kapital lahko predstavlja le še 15 % potrebnega deleža temeljnega kapitala, torej kadar je delež temeljnega kapitala 4 %, morajo 3,4 % predstavljati osnovni kapital in javne rezerve (na primer rezerve za posebne namene, prenesene na deželne banke).
For balance-sheet purposes IB's capital was transferred as of 1 January 1991. It was available to LSH as a guarantee function for the first eight months of 1991.
Kapital IB je bil zaradi bilance stanja vložen 1.1.1991 in je bil LSH prvih osem mesecev v letu 1991 na razpolago za funkcijo jamstva.
OJ L 150, 23.6.2000, p. 1; actions challenging that decision have been brought by Germany (Case C-376/99), by North Rhine-Westphalia (Case T-233/99) and by WestLB (Case T-228/99). The Commission has also brought proceedings for infringement of the Treaty (Case C-209/00).
UL L 150 23.6.2000, str. 1; pravna sredstva so vložili Nemčija (Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, zadeva C 376/99), dežela Severno Porenje-Vestfalija (Sodišče prve stopnje, zadeva T 233/99) in WestLB (Sodišče prve stopnje, zadeva T 228/99); Komisija pa je začela postopek glede kršitev Pogodbe (Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, C 209/00).
An ‘incorporation agreement’ of 2 January 1991 between the Land and LSH regulated the transfer of WAK's assets, including all rights and obligations, with effect from 1 January 1991. (32) Under Section 14(1) of the IBG, IB continued to perform all of WAK's tasks, which are listed in Annex 2 to the IBG.
V skladu s poglavjem 14(1) IBG je IB nadaljevala z opravljanjem vseh nalog WAK, navedenih v Prilogi 2 k IBG.
[…] Aid element
Element pomoči
Rather, the capital injection was made in order to enable the Landesbank to increase its capital in the light of the tighter rules on core capital/own resources ratios introduced on 30 June 93 so as to avoid an otherwise necessary reduction in its business volume/risk assets and (in addition) to enable it to expand in future. This conscious economic calculation by the Land as joint owner also enabled LSH to seize future opportunities in its competitive business.
Do vloge kapitala je verjetneje prišlo, da bi deželni banki omogočili, da se s povečanjem obsega kapitala ob upoštevanju od 30. junija 1993 veljavne poostritve predpisov za deleže temeljnega kapitala in lastnih sredstev izogne sicer potrebnemu zmanjšanju obsega poslovanja/tveganih sredstev, in da bi ji (poleg tega) omogočili širjenje v prihodnosti.. Ta zavestni ekonomski izračun dežele kot solastnice je LSH omogočil, da tudi v prihodnosti izkorišča tržne priložnosti na področju konkurenčnih dejavnosti.
on aid granted by Germany Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen — Girozentrale
o pomoči Nemčije za Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen – Girozentrale
(notified under document number C(2004) 3931)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2004) 3931)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above and having regard to their comments,
ob pozivu zainteresiranih strank, da na podlagi zgoraj navedenih določb izrazijo svoje pripombe in ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
In its second letter, the BdB accordingly lodged a formal complaint and called on the Commission to initiate proceedings under Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty (now Article 88(2)) against Germany.
V drugem navedenem pismu je BdB zato vložilo uradno pritožbo in od Komisije zahtevalo, da proti Nemčiji začne postopek v skladu s členom 93(2) Pogodbe ES (zdaj člen 88(2) Pogodbe).
In February and March 1995 and December 1996, several banks associated themselves individually with the complaint lodged by their association.
Februarja in marca 1995 ter decembra 1996 se je pritožbi združenja pridružilo več njegovih posameznih bank.
By letters dated 6 August 1997 and 30 July 1998, the BdB informed the Commission of two further transfers of assets, to Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein in Schleswig-Holstein and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen in Hessen.
BdB je v pismih z dne 6. avgusta 1997 in 30. julija 1998 obvestilo Komisijo o še dveh prenosih sredstev, v zvezni deželi Schleswig-Holstein na Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein in zvezni deželi Hessen na Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen.
As regards the latter transaction, the Commission wrote to Germany on 31 July 1998 requesting information.
Kar zadeva slednji prenos, je Komisija v pismu z dne 31. julija 1998 Nemčijo prosila za informacije.
Germany answered by letter dated 2 October 1998 that this was currently still only at the planning stage and that the Commission had no cause for concern either now or at a later stage.
Nemčija je v pismu z dne 2. oktobra 1998 odgovorila, da je prenos šele v postopku načrtovanja in da Komisija nima razloga za skrb in ga tudi ne bo imela.
The Commission first examined the transfer of assets to Westdeutsche Landesbank (‘WestLB’), but announced that it would review the transfers to the other banks in the light of the findings in that case.
Komisija je najprej preiskala prenos sredstev na Westdeutsche Landesbank (WestLB), a napovedala preiskavo prenosov na druge banke glede na ugotovitve v primeru WestLB.
It finally adopted a decision on the WestLB case in 1999, concluding that there was a state aid component equal to the difference between the remuneration paid and the normal market remuneration, which was incompatible with the common market and should be recovered.
Glede tega primera je nato leta 1999 sprejela Odločbo 2000/392 z dne 8. julija 1999 o ukrepu Nemčije v prid banki Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, v kateri je ugotovila, da ukrep pomoči (razlika med izplačanim nadomestilom in običajnim tržnim nadomestilom) ni združljiv s skupnim trgom, ter odredila vračilo pomoči.
The decision was annulled by the Court of First Instance on 6 March 2003 for not setting out sufficient reasons as regards two of the factors used to calculate the appropriate remuneration, but it was confirmed in all other respects.
Sodišče prve stopnje je to odločbo 6. marca 2003 razveljavilo zaradi nezadostnih razlogov za dva izmed dejavnikov, uporabljenih pri izračunu višine nadomestila.
On 20 October 2004, the Commission issued a new decision which took account of the Court's criticisms.
Komisija je 20. oktobra 2004 izdala novo odločbo, v kateri je upoštevala kritiko Sodišča.
On 1 September 1999, the Commission sent Germany a request for information on the transfers of assets to the other Landesbanks, including Helaba.
Komisija je v pismu z dne 1. septembra 1999 Nemčijo zaprosila za informacije o prenosih na druge deželne banke, med katerimi je tudi Helaba.
By letter dated 8 December 1999, Germany submitted information on the transfer of the special assets of the Land to Helaba, which it supplemented, following a further request for information from the Commission sent on 31 October 2000, by letter dated 21 January 2001.
Zvezna vlada je nato v pismu z dne 8. decembra 1999 predložila informacije o prenosu posebnih sredstev na Helabo, ki jih je dopolnila v pismu z dne 21. januarja 2001 kot odgovoru na prošnjo Komisije za nadaljnje informacije z dne 31. oktobra 2000.
By letter dated 13 November 2002, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided, with regard to the transfer of the special assets by the Land of Hessen as a silent partnership contribution to Helaba, to initiate formal proceedings under Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je v pismu z dne 13. novembra 2002 Nemčijo obvestila o svojem sklepu, da bo v zvezi s prenosom posebnega sklada dežele Hessen v obliki vložka tihe družbe na Helabo sprožila uradni postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
At the same time, the Commission also initiated proceedings in respect of similar transfers of assets to Norddeutsche Landesbank — Girozentrale (‘NordLB’), Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein — Girozentrale (‘LSH’), Hamburgische Landesbank — Girozentrale (‘HLB’) and Bayerische Landesbank-Girozentrale (‘Bayern LB’).
Istočasno je sprožila preiskovalni postopek v zvezi s podobnimi prenosi sredstev na Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale (NordLB), Landesbank Schleswig-Holstein – Girozentrale (LSH), Hamburgische Landesbank – Girozentrale (HLB) in Bayerische Landesbank – Girozentrale (BayernLB).
It had already initiated proceedings in respect of a further similar transfer of promotion-related assets by the Land of Berlin to Landesbank Berlin back in July 2002.
Komisija je pred tem že julija 2002 sprožila postopek v zvezi s še enim podobnim prenosom sredstev za pospeševanje s strani zvezne dežele Berlin na Landesbank Berlin.
The decisions initiating proceedings were published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Odločitve o sprožitvi postopka so bile objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
By letter dated 9 April 2003, Germany submitted comments on the initiation of proceedings in the Helaba case.
Nemčija je v pismu z dne 9. aprila 2003 izrazila svoje pripombe glede začetka postopka v primeru Helaba.
By letter dated 29 July 2003, the BdB submitted comments on all the decisions taken on 13 November 2002 to initiate proceedings, and those comments were forwarded to Germany by letter dated 28 July 2003 for its opinion.
BdB je v pismu z dne 29. julija 2003 izrazilo skupne pripombe glede vseh odločitev o sprožitvi postopka z dne 13. novembra 2002, to pa se je skupaj s prošnjo za pripombe posredovalo Nemčiji v pismu z dne 28. julija 2003.
By letters dated 10 October and 4 December 2003, Germany submitted comments on the BdB's remarks in the Helaba case.
Nemčija je v pismih z dne 10. oktobra in 4. decembra 2003 izrazila pripombe glede ugotovitev BdB v primeru Helaba.
By letter dated 30 October 2003, Germany also forwarded comments by the Government of North Rhine-Westphalia and by WestLB on the BdB's remarks.
V pismih z dne 30. oktobra 2003 je predložila odgovor vlade dežele Severno Porenje-Vestfalija in WestLB na pripombe združenja Bundesverband deutscher Banken.
By letter dated 7 April 2004, the Commission requested further information from Germany on all the Landesbank proceedings, and wrote specifically requesting information on the Helaba case by letters dated 19 May and 3 August 2004.
Komisija je v pismu z dne 7. aprila Nemčijo prosila za nadaljnje informacije o postopkih v primerih vseh deželnih bank in posebej primeru Helaba v pismih z dne 19. maja 2004 in 3. avgusta 2004.
Germany replied by letters dated 1 June, 23 June and 23 August 2004.
Nemčija je nato odgovorila v pismih z dne 1. junija 2004, 23. junija 2004 in 23. avgusta 2004.
In September and October 2004, talks took place between the BdB, the Land of Hessen and Helaba on the question of an appropriate remuneration for the capital provided.
Septembra in oktobra 2004 so potekali pogovori med BdB, deželo Hessen in Helabo o vprašanju primernega nadomestila za razpoložljiv kapital.
No understanding was reached.
Do sporazuma ni prišlo.
By letter dated 28 September 2004, the BdB sent comments on the proceedings.
BdB je v pismu z dne 28. septembra 2004 znova podalo pripombe glede postopka.