natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this case, it was considered appropriate to increase the safety factors used in the setting of an acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL).
V tem primeru se je zdelo primerno okrepiti varnostne dejavnike, uporabljene pri določanju dopustne ravni izpostavljenosti uporabnikov (AOEL).
The exposure resulting from the handling of the substance and its application at the rates, i.e. the intended doses per hectare, proposed by the notifier, would exceed this level and, in other words, lead to an unacceptable risk for the operators.
Izpostavljenost zaradi ravnanja s snovjo in zaradi njene uporabe v količinah, tj. načrtovanih odmerkih na hektar, ki jih predlaga prijavitelj, bi presegala to raven in, povedano drugače, za uporabnike predstavljala nesprejemljivo tveganje.
Consequently, as these concerns remain unresolved, assessments made on the basis of the information submitted have not demonstrated that it may be expected that, under the proposed conditions of use, plant protection products containing alachlor satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5(1)(a) and (b) of Directive 91/414/EEC
Ker ostajajo ti problemi nerešeni, ocene, izdelane na podlagi predloženih podatkov, niso pokazale, da bi fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo alaklor, pod predvidenimi pogoji uporabe lahko izpolnjevala splošne zahteve iz člena 5(1)(a) in (b) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Alachlor should therefore not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Alaklor zato ne sme biti vključen v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Measures should be taken to ensure that existing authorisations for plant protection products containing alachlor are withdrawn within a prescribed period and are not renewed and that no new authorisations for such products are granted.
Sprejeti je treba ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se obstoječe registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo alaklor, prekličejo v predpisanem roku in se ne podaljšajo ter da se ne izdajo nove registracije za taka sredstva.
Any period of grace for disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks of plant protection products containing alachlor allowed by Member States, should be limited to a period no longer than 12 months to allow existing stocks to be used in no more than one further growing season.
Vsakršno podaljšanje roka za odstranjevanje, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog fitofarmacevtskih sredstev z alaklorom, ki ga dovolijo države članice, je treba omejiti na obdobje, ki ni daljše od dvanajstih mesecev, da se omogoči uporaba obstoječih zalog v največ eni nadaljnji rastni sezoni.
This Decision does not prejudice any action the Commission may undertake at a later stage for this active substance within the framework of Council Directive 79/117/EEC of 21 December 1978 prohibiting the placing on the market and use of plant protection products containing certain active substances [8], as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 [9].
Ta odločba ne posega v noben ukrep, ki ga bo Komisija morda sprejela pozneje v zvezi s to aktivno snovjo v okviru Direktive Sveta 79/117/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1978 o prepovedi dajanja v promet in uporabe fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo nekatere aktivne snovi [8], kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 850/2004 [9].
This decision does not prejudice the submission of an application for alachlor according to the provisions of Article 6 (2) of Directive 91/414/EEC in view of a possible inclusion in its Annex I.
Ta odločba ne vpliva na predložitev zahtevka za alaklor v skladu z določbami člena 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS zaradi morebitne uvrstitve v Prilogo I Direktive.
Alachlor shall not be included as active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Alaklor se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Authorisations for plant protection products containing alachlor are withdrawn by 18 June 2007;
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo alaklor, prekličejo do 18. junija 2007;
from 19 December 2006 no authorisations for plant protection products containing alachlor are granted or renewed under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
se od 19. decembra 2006 ne odobri ali podaljša nobena registracija fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo alaklor, na podlagi odstopanja iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with the provisions of Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible and shall expire not later than 18 June 2008.
Vsakršno podaljšanje roka, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu z določbami člena 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, je čim krajše in poteče najpozneje 18. junija 2008.
OJ L 230, 19.8.1991, p. 1, Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/75/EC (OJ L 248, 12.9.2006, p. 3).
UL L 230, 19.8.1991, str. 1. Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2006/7/ES (UL L 248, 12.9.2006, str. 3).
OJ L 366, 15.12.1992, p. 10, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) N° 2266/2000 (OJ L 259, 13.10.2000, p. 27.)
UL L 366, 15.12.1992, str. 10. Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2266/2000 (UL L 259, 13.10.2000, str. 27).
OJ L 107, 28.4.1994, p. 8, Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) N° 2230/95 (OJ L 225, 22.9.1995, p. 1.).
UL L 107, 28.4.1994, str. 8. Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2230/95 (UL L 225, 22.9.1995, str. 1).
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant health, Plant protection products and their Residues on a request from the Commission related to the evaluation of alachlor in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (Question No EFSA-Q-2004-48) adopted on 28 October 2004.
Mnenje Znanstvenega odbora za zdravstveno varstvo rastlin, fitofarmacevtska sredstva in njihove ostanke glede ocene alaklora v okviru Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS, na zahtevo Komisije (vprašanje št. EFSA-Q-2004-48), sprejeto 28. oktobra 2004.
OJ L 33, 8.2.1979, p. 36.
UL L 33, 08.2.1979, str. 36.
on State aid which Italy plans to grant to agricultural undertakings in Sicily
o državni pomoči Italije, predvideni za kmetijska podjetja v deželi Siciliji
(notified under document number C(2005) 52)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 52)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu [1] zainteresiranih strani k predložitvi pripomb v skladu z navedenim členom in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 15 December 1999, registered on 20 December 1999, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission of Regional Law No 22/1999 on emergency measures in the agricultural sector (hereinafter ‘Law No 22/1999’) in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
S pismom z dne 15. decembra 1999, vpisanim v evidenco 20. decembra 1999, je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe Komisijo uradno obvestilo o sprejetju zakona dežele Sicilije št. 22 z dne 22. septembra 1999 o „nujnih ukrepih za kmetijski sektor“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu zakon št. 22/1999).
By letters dated of 6 October 2000, registered on 9 October 2000, 1 February 2001, registered on 5 February 2001, and 30 July 2001, registered on 1 August 2001, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union sent the Commission the further information requested from the Italian authorities by letters dated 23 February 2000, 20 November 2000 and 27 March 2001.
S pismom z dne 6. oktobra 2000, vpisanim v evidenco 9. oktobra 2000, z dne 1. februarja 2001, vpisanim v evidenco 5. februarja 2001, in z dne 30. julija 2001, vpisanim v evidenco 1. avgusta 2001, je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji sporočilo Komisiji dodatne podatke, ki jih je ta zahtevala s pismi z dne 23. februarja 2000, 20. novembra 2000 in 27. marca 2001.
By letter dated 25 September 2001, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
S pismom z dne 25. septembra 2001 je Komisija obvestila Italijo o svojem sklepu, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe v zvezi z zadevno pomočjo.
The Commission invited the third parties concerned to submit their comments on the aid in question.
Komisija je povabila zainteresirane tretje stranke, da predložijo pripombe v zvezi z zadevno pomočjo.
The Commission did not receive any comments from interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb v zvezi s tem s strani zainteresiranih tretjih strank.
On 29 November 2001 the Commission and the Italian authorities met in Brussels.
Dne 29. novembra 2001 je bilo v Bruslju srečanje služb Komisije in italijanskih organov.
By letter dated 29 April 2002, registered on 30 April 2002, Italy sent the Commission further information on the planned aid.
S pismom z dne 29. aprila 2002, vpisanim v evidenco 30. aprila 2002, je Italija Komisiji sporočila nadaljnje podatke v zvezi z načrtovanim ukrepom.
The measures originally planned under the Regional Law in question are set out in points 9 to 21, broken down by Article:
Ukrepi, ki so bili prvotno določeni v zadevnem zakonu, so po členih opisani v uvodnih izjavah (9)–(21):
Article 1: Extension of agricultural loans
Člen 1: odlog plačila kmetijskih menic
The article provides for agricultural credit institutes to extend until 31 December 2000 agricultural loans due for repayment in 1998 and 1999.
Člen določa, da kreditne institucije in družbe, ki odobrijo kmetijsko posojilo, odložijo obveznosti s področja kmetijstva, ki zapadejo med letoma 1998 in 1999, do 31. decembra 2000.
Such extensions would be subject to the reference rate applicable at the date the loans fall due, with any related charges being borne by the borrowers.
Za dejavnosti odloga velja referenčni tečaj, veljaven na datum zapadlosti obveznosti, pri čemer vsi zadevni stroški bremenijo upravičence.
Extension of the agricultural loans does not entail government action but is a matter for the contractual parties (farmers and credit institutes).
Odlog plačila kmetijskih menic ne predvideva vključevanja uprave, vendar je to odvisno od pogodbenega dogovora strank (kmetov in kreditnih institucij).
However, Italy has undertaken not to apply this measure.
Vseeno se je Italija zavezala, da zadevnega ukrepa ne bo uporabila.
Article 2: Renegotiation of agricultural loans
Člen 2: ponovna preučitev kmetijskih posojil
The article provides for institutes offering special conditions for loans [3], and the borrowers, to request the renegotiation of these loans where their reference rate is above the rate applicable at the time of the entry into force of the law.
Člen določa, da lahko družbe, ki dodeljujejo nekatere finančne olajšave [3], in upravičenci do zadevne pomoči zahtevajo ponovno preučitev posojil, če je njihov tečaj višji od tečaja, ki velja ob začetku veljavnosti zakona.
The agricultural loans qualifying for renegotiation will continue to benefit from the subsidy on the outstanding interest payments, even where the negotiating institute receives a request to accept early repayment of the loan.
Dejavnosti s področja kmetijskih posojil, predložene v ponovno preučitev, še naprej vključujejo plačilo nezapadlih obresti, tudi če se instituciji, ki posojilo ponovno preuči, predloži zahtevek za odplačilo posojila.
Article 3: Agri-environmental measures
Člen 3: kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi
The article provides for the payment of agri-environmental aid that had been granted to the region of Sicily under Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside [4] but which did not qualify for funding by the European Union.
Člen dovoljuje poravnavo kmetijsko-okoljske pomoči, ki jo je odobrila dežela Sicilija v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 2078/92 z dne 30. junija 1992 v zvezi z metodami kmetijske proizvodnje, ki so združljive z zahtevami varstva okolja in ohranjanja podeželja [4], vendar ne vključuje prispevka Evropske unije.
It relates to agri-environmental measures set out in the programme drawn up by the Region of Sicily for 1999 and which had already been notified to farmers when the Commission declared such expenditure inadmissible under the co-financing provisions of the Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92.
To so ukrepi, ki jih določa kmetijsko-okoljski načrt dežele Sicilije za leto 1999 in so jih kmetje že začeli izvajati, takoj ko je Komisija izrazila negativno stališče o upravičenosti takšnih stroškov na področju sofinancirane pomoči iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 2078/92.
The funding requirement comprises LIT 25 billion (EUR 12911420), as against a budget allocation of LIT 10 billion (EUR 5160000).
Finančna potreba je 25000 milijonov ITL (12911420 EUR). Odobrena sredstva so 10000 milijonov ITL (5160000 EUR).
Sicily's agri-environmental programme had been approved by the Commission [5] up until the end of 1999, whereas for the majority of Italian regions the programmes had been approved up to 1998.
Komisija [5] je odobrila kmetijsko-okoljski načrt Sicilije do konca leta 1999, načrti večine italijanskih dežel pa so bili odobreni do leta 1998.
In March 1998 the Commission had decided to make the continuation of any programmes due to expire (or any amendments) conditional upon the submission of evaluations of programmes already carried out.
Marca 1998 se je Komisija za nadaljevanje programov, katerih veljavnost se izteka (ali morebitne spremembe), odločila uvesti obvezno predložitev ocene izvedenih načrtov.
In October 1998 Sicilian farmers had undertaken the commitments in question, thus incurring expenditure and losing income.
Oktobra 1998 so sicilijanski kmetje sprejeli zadevne obveznosti, vključno s stroški in izgubo dohodkov.
In November 1998 the Commission refused to underwrite new agri-environmental commitments until an evaluation had been carried out [6].
Novembra 1998 je Komisija izrazila nesoglasje v zvezi s sprejetjem novih kmetijsko-okoljskih obveznosti brez predložitve ocene [6].
The Commission stated that a definitive decision on this matter would be taken following a discussion with the competent authorities in the Member States.
Komisija je pojasnila, da bo končno odločitev dejansko sprejela po razpravi z organi držav članic.
Sicily submitted the evaluation report in January 1999.
Sicilija je poročilo o oceni predložila januarja 1999.
Italy plans to grant the same types of aid as set out in the approved agri-environmental programme and in accordance with the same criteria, at the rate of 50 % of the planned amounts.
Italija ima namen dodeliti pomoč v enaki obliki in pod enakimi pogoji, kot jih določa odobreni kmetijsko-okoljski načrt, v višini 50 % predvidenega zneska.
This percentage reflects the effective duration of the commitments, in other words from October 1998 to May 1999 (six months instead of one year).
Ta odstotek po načelu časovnega sorazmerja ustreza dejanskemu trajanju obveznosti, to je od oktobra 1998 do maja 1999 (šest mesecev namesto enega leta).
Article 4: Measures to promote greenhouse crops
Člen 4: ukrepi v zvezi z gojenjem v rastlinjakih
The article provides for aid to promote greenhouse crops, comprising 40 % of the cost of soil sterilisation, 50 % of the purchase price of sterilisation equipment and a subsidy of LIT 250/kg for the purchase of plastic sheeting for tunnel greenhouses.
Člen zagotavlja dodelitev pomoči za gojenje v rastlinjakih, ki zajema 40 % stroškov sterilizacije površin, 50 % nakupne cene materiala za sterilizacijo ter subvencijo v višini 250 ITL/kg plastike, kupljene za izdelavo rastlinjakov s tunelom.
The Italian authorities have noted their intention to use, as the legal basis for this measure, Article 49 of Law 86/82 of 5 August 1982 (hereinafter ‘Law 86/1982’), already approved by the Commission as aid intended to compensate for losses caused by adverse weather conditions.
Italijanski organi so pojasnili, da je Komisija kot pravno podlago za takšno pomoč že odobrila uporabo člena 49 zakona št. 40 z dne 5. avgusta 1982 (v nadaljnjem besedilu zakon št. 86/1982) kot pomoč za nadomestilo škode, ki so jo povzročile slabe vremenske razmere.
The budget for this measure is LIT 20 billion (EUR 10329000).
Za ta ukrep so odobrena sredstva v višini 20000 milijonov ITL (10329000 EUR).
Article 5: Co-financing of the national citrus cultivation plan
Člen 5: sofinanciranje načrta za gojenje agrumov
The article includes a budget provision for action under the national citrus cultivation plan.
Člen določa odobritev sredstev za financiranje ukrepov iz nacionalnega načrta za gojenje agrumov.
After excluding this measure from the dossier, the Commission approved the aid as part of aid C 65/A/2001 by Decision SG(2003) 232301 of 15 October 2003.
Po izločitvi ukrepa iz tega akta je Komisija odobrila pomoč kot del pomoči C 65/A/2001 z Odločbo SG (2003) 232301 z dne 15. oktobra 2003.
Article 6: Crop protection associations
Člen 6: konzorciji za zaščito kmetijske proizvodnje
The article provides for the grant to crop protection associations of aid to cover 50 % of the expenditure incurred by an insurance fund covering its members' crops.
Člen določa odobritev prispevka v korist konzorcijev za zaščito kmetijske proizvodnje v višini do 50 % stroškov podpornega sklada za zaščito pridelkov partnerjev.
The aid comprises a contribution to both insurance premiums and the management costs of the associations (0,5 % of the sum insured), up to a maximum expenditure of LIT 100 million (EUR 51645) per association.
Takšna pomoč vključuje prispevek k plačilu zavarovalnih premij in stroškov upravljanja konzorcijev (0,50 % zavarovanega kapitala) s stroškovno mejo 100 milijonov ITL (51645 EUR) na konzorcij.
Article 7: Upgrading of livestock farming
Člen 7: ukrepi za posodobitev živinoreje
The article provides for funding for the measure set out in Article 11 of Regional Law No. 40 of 7 November 1997 (hereinafter ‘Law No 40-1997’).
Člen določa odobritev finančne pomoči za ukrep iz člena 11 deželnega zakona št. 40 z dne 7. novembra 1997 (v nadaljnjem besedilu zakon št. 40/1997).
This measure was studied during the examination of file NN 37/98 and approved by Commission letter SG(2002) 233136 dated 11 December 2002.
Takšen ukrep je bil preverjen na podlagi akta NN 37/98 in odobren s pismom Komisije št. SG (2002) 233136 z dne 11. decembra 2002.
Granting of the above aid is subject to approval by the Commission.
Zgoraj opisano pomoč mora odobriti Komisija.
REASONS FOR INITIATING PROCEEDINGS
RAZLOGI ZA ZAČETEK POSTOPKA
The Commission had initiated proceedings in respect of the scheme in question for the reasons set out at points 22 to 29:
Komisija je začela postopek v zvezi z zadevnim ukrepom zaradi razlogov iz uvodnih izjav od (22) do (29).
Article 1 (extension of agricultural loans): despite Italy's assurances that the measure would not be applied, it had not been officially removed from the wording of the law, and the information provided was too limited to enable its compatibility to be assessed.
Člen 1 (odlog plačila kmetijskih menic): Kljub zagotovilom Italije, da se ukrep ne bo uporabljal, ta uradno ni bil odstranjen iz besedila zakona, predloženi podatki pa so bili preveč pomanjkljivi za oceno njegove združljivosti.
Article 2 (renegotiation of agricultural loans): the Italian authorities had stated that the loans subject to renegotiation were those granted under a regional law (Regional Law No 13 of 25 March 1986, hereinafter ‘Law No 13/1986’, approved by the Commission [8] and some national laws [9].
Člen 2 (ponovna preučitev kmetijskih posojil): Italijanski organi so razglasili, da so posojila, ki se morajo ponovno preučiti, tista, ki so bila odobrena v skladu z deželnim predpisom (deželni zakon št. 13 z dne 25. marca 1986, v nadaljnjem besedilu zakon št. 13/86, ki ga je odobrila Komisija [8]) in nekaterimi nacionalnimi predpisi [9].
It was not clear whether the national legal basis of the measure had been notified to the Commission and approved by it.
Ni bilo jasno, ali je Komisija priglasila in odobrila nacionalno pravno podlago ukrepa.
If the loans with special conditions to be renegotiated under this measure were considered to constitute illegal and incompatible aid, any increase in the intensity of the aid would also be incompatible.
Če bi pomenilo posojilo z ugodnimi pogoji, namenjeno ponovni preučitvi, nezakonito in nezdružljivo pomoč, bi bilo nezdružljivo tudi vsako povečanje intenzivnosti pomoči.
Furthermore, it could not be inferred from the wording whether the renegotiation of the loans would simultaneously bring about the alignment of the rates of aid with those provided for by the Community Guidelines on State aid in the agriculture sector [10] (hereinafter ‘the Guidelines’).
Razen tega iz besedila ni bilo razvidno, ali bi dejavnosti ponovne preučitve posojil povzročile sočasno uskladitev stopnje pomoči s stopnjo, predvideno v Smernicah Skupnosti o državni pomoči v kmetijskem sektorju [10] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Smernice“).
According to the aid scheme, such an alignment would have had to be made by 30 June 2000 or 31 December 2001 at the latest.
Takšna uskladitev bi se morala v skladu s programom pomoči izvesti najpozneje 30. junija 2000 ali 31. decembra 2000.
Article 3 (agri-environmental measures): for the purposes of excluding any possible overcompensation of the additional costs and loss of income sustained by farmers as a result of the adoption of agri-environmental commitments, it could not be inferred from the available information whether the maximum amounts and conditions had been observed. These are:
Člen 3 (kmetijsko-okoljski ukrepi): Pri ugotavljanju, da ne gre za morebitno prekomerno nadomestilo dodatnih stroškov in izgube dohodka kmetov zaradi sprejetja kmetijsko-okoljskih obveznosti, razpoložljivi podatki niso zadostovali za potrditev dejanskega upoštevanja najvišjih zneskov in pogojev iz:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and amending and repealing certain Regulations [11], and
Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) ter o spremembi in razveljavitvi določenih uredb [11] in
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1750/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) [12].
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1750/1999 z dne 23. julija 1999 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/1999 o podpori razvoja podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) [12].
Article 4 (measures in favour of greenhouse crops): regarding the application of point 11.3 of the Guidelines (aid to compensate farmers for losses caused by adverse weather conditions), it would seem that only aid to purchase material to rebuild tunnel greenhouses would meet the requirements of the Guidelines.
Člen 4 (ukrepi v zvezi z gojenjem v rastlinjakih): v primeru uporabe točke 11.3 Smernic (pomoč kmetom za nadomestilo izgub, ki so jih povzročile slabe vremenske razmere) bi ustrezal zahtevam Smernic le prispevek za nakup materiala za izdelavo rastlinjakov s tuneli.
However, aid for soil sterilisation or purchasing sterilising machinery would not seem to be admissible as the Guidelines permit compensation only for damage caused to buildings and machinery by adverse weather conditions.
Prispevek za sterilizacijo površin in prispevek za nakup opreme za sterilizacijo ne bi bila upravičena, ker Smernice dovoljujejo le nadomestilo škode, ki so jo slabe vremenske razmere povzročile na zgradbah in opremi.
Furthermore, Italy had not provided guarantees that any compensation received from insurance policies, and any costs not incurred by farmers, would be deducted from the aid.
Razen tega Italija ni zagotovila, da bi se od pomoči odštelo kakršno koli nadomestilo na podlagi zavarovalne police in stroški, ki ne bremenijo kmeta.