natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This argument could not be accepted because the information given by the exporter and the importer was not reconcilable.
Te navedbe ni možno sprejeti, saj informacije, ki sta jih predložila izvoznik in uvoznik niso bile usklajene.
During the on-spot verification visit at the premises of the exporting producer, the investigators were informed that the reason why export prices between the parties are much higher than normal is that a special arrangement or agreement exists between the exporting producer and the importer.
Med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem, opravljenim v prostorih proizvajalca izvoznika, so bili preiskovalci obveščeni, da je razlog za znatno višje izvozne cene med strankami, kakor so običajne, obstoj posebnega dogovora ali sporazuma med proizvajalcem izvoznikom in uvoznikom.
In addition, all export invoices referred for details to this agreement.
Poleg tega so se vsi izvozni računi sklicevali na določbe tega sporazuma.
The exporting producer denied the existence of a written agreement, but explained that the importer concerned was prepared to pay such higher prices in order to obtain and maintain the exclusivity of sales of certain products of the exporting producer for certain markets.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je zanikal obstoj pisnega sporazuma, vendar je razložil, da je bil zadevni uvoznik pripravljen plačati take višje cene, da bi pridobil in ohranil pogodbo o izključni pravici do prodaje določenih izdelkov proizvajalca izvoznika na določenih trgih.
The importer also denied the existence of any special relationship and explained during the on-spot verification visit that the prices paid to the exporting producer are higher because of the high quality of the products in question.
Uvoznik je tudi zanikal obstoj kakršnega koli posebnega razmerja in med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem razložil, da so cene, plačane proizvajalcu izvozniku, višje zaradi visoke kakovosti zadevnih izdelkov. Ta navedba ni bila podprta z nobenim dokazom in je bila dejansko v nasprotju z ugotovitvami raziskave.
It is considered that in these circumstances, the export prices were unreliable and have to be adjusted either because of the existence of some form of compensatory arrangement in the light of the provisions of Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, or for differences in physical characteristics reflecting the alleged higher quality of the products in the light of Article 2(10)(a) of the basic Regulation. However, the claim on quality was not supported by any evidence and was indeed contradicted by the findings of the investigation.
Šteje se, da so bile v teh okoliščinah izvozne cene nezanesljive in jih je treba popraviti bodisi zaradi obstoja neke vrste kompenzacijskega dogovora v smislu določb člena 2(9) osnovne uredbe bodisi zaradi razlik v fizičnih značilnostih, ki odražajo domnevno višjo kakovost izdelkov v smislu člena 2(10)(a) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any other information, the export prices were constructed as set out in recital (49) of the provisional Regulation.
Ob pomanjkanju drugih informacij so bile izvozne cene konstruirane v skladu z uvodno izjavo (49) začasne uredbe.
The same exporting producer and the importer also claimed that the calculation of constructed export prices was incorrect because the profit margin used in the calculation was significantly higher than the profit margins used for the same purposes in other cases in the past and, therefore, it was unreasonable.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik in uvoznik sta tudi trdila, da je bil izračun konstruiranih izvoznih cen nepravilen, ker je bila stopnja dobička, uporabljena pri izračunu, znatno višja od stopenj dobička, uporabljenih za iste namene v drugih primerih v preteklosti, in je bila zato neustrezna.
In this respect, it is noted that every case is considered on its own merits and the findings of one investigation cannot be simply transposed to another.
Glede tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da se vsak primer obravnava posamično in da ugotovitve ene preiskave ne morejo preprosto veljati tudi za drugo.
In this case, the profit margin used in the calculation was the weighted average of the actual net profits on sales of the ‘product concerned’ reported by eleven unrelated importers in the course of the investigation.
V tem primeru je bila stopnja dobička, uporabljena pri izračunu, tehtano povprečje dejanskega neto dobička pri prodaji zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je med preiskavo sporočilo enajst nepovezanih uvoznikov.
No evidence has been submitted which could challenge these data.
Predložen ni bil noben dokaz, ki bi izpodbijal te podatke.
Therefore, the claim should be rejected.
Zato se zahtevek zavrne.
However, it should be noted that following the verification visit at the premises of the importer concerned, the calculation of the constructed export prices has been revised in order to take into account necessary corrections on certain resale prices and the SG&A expenses of the importer.
Vendar je treba omeniti, da je bil po preveritvenem obisku na kraju samem, opravljenem v prostorih zadevnega uvoznika, izračun konstruiranih izvoznih cen popravljen, da bi upošteval nujne popravke določenih cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ter prodajne, splošne in upravne stroške uvoznika.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one exporting producer requested an adjustment on certain export prices for differences in levels of trade between direct export sales to the Community and sales for export to the Community via traders in the PRC, in accordance with Article 2(10)(d)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval prilagoditev določenih izvoznih cen zaradi razlik v ravneh trgovanja med neposredno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost in prodajo za izvoz v Skupnost prek trgovcev v LRK v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe.
It argued that export sales via Chinese traders involve further sales to traders, which normally are not necessary in cases of direct exports to the Community.
Trdil je, da izvozna prodaja prek kitajskih trgovcev vključuje nadaljnjo prodajo trgovcem, ki običajno ni potrebna v primerih neposrednega izvoza v Skupnost.
In this respect, it is noted that the abovementioned Article of the basic Regulation provides that an adjustment for differences in levels of trade may be granted where it is demonstrated that consistent and distinct differences exist in functions and prices of the seller for the different levels of trade in the domestic market of the exporting country.
S tem v zvezi je bilo ugotovljeno, da zgoraj navedeni člen osnovne uredbe predvideva, da se prilagoditev zaradi razlik v ravneh trgovanja lahko zagotovi, kadar se dokaže, da obstajajo stalne in jasne razlike v funkcijah in cenah prodajalca za različne ravni trgovanja na notranjem trgu države izvoznice.
In this case, the exporting producer claimed and tried to demonstrate the need for an adjustment by reference to the circumstances of its export sales, rather than its domestic sales.
V tem primeru je proizvajalec izvoznik trdil in si prizadeval dokazati potrebo po prilagoditvi s sklicevanjem na okoliščine njegove izvozne prodaje in ne njegove domače prodaje.
This is not a sufficient basis for claiming a level of trade adjustment.
To ni zadovoljiva podlaga za zahtevo prilagoditve ravni trgovanja.
Furthermore, the investigation established that all exports of the exporting producer concerned, as well as the domestic sales in the analogue country, were made to traders, i.e. no different levels of trade existed between export price and normal value.
Poleg tega je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da sta bila celoten izvoz zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika in tudi domača prodaja v primerljivi državi namenjena trgovcem, torej med izvozno ceno in normalno vrednostjo niso obstajale različne ravni trgovanja.
In calculating the dumping margin for all other exporting producers, as set out in recital (53) of the provisional Regulation, the exporting producer which was granted MET was no longer taken into account.
Pri izračunu stopnje dampinga za druge proizvajalce izvoznike (glej uvodno izjavo (53) začasne uredbe) proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu je bila odobrena TGO, ni bil več upoštevan.
No other comments were submitted on the findings set out in recitals (52) and (53) of the provisional Regulation which are hereby confirmed.
Predložena ni bila nobena druga pripomba glede ugotovitev iz uvodnih izjav (52) in (53) začasne uredbe, ki se zato potrdijo.
However, for the exporting producer which was granted MET, the dumping margin was established by comparing the weighted average normal value for each type exported to the Community as determined in recitals (28) to (35) of this Regulation to the weighted average export price of the corresponding type, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar je bila za proizvajalca izvoznika z odobreno TGO stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi primerjave tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti za vsako vrsto, izvoženo v Skupnost, kakor je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (28) do (35) te uredbe, s tehtanim povprečjem izvozne cene ustrezne vrste v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
The dumping margins finally determined following the amendments set out above, expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Dokončno določene stopnje dampinga po spremembah, navedenih zgoraj, izražene kot odstotek od neto cene franko meja Skupnosti, neocarinjeno, so:
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning the Community production, as set out in recitals (55) and (56) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi s proizvodnjo Skupnosti, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (55) in (56) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning the definition of the Community industry, as set out in recital (57) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z opredelitvijo pojma industrije Skupnosti, navedene v uvodni izjavi (57) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning the Community consumption, as set out in recitals (58) and (59) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi s porabo Skupnosti, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (58) in (59) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning imports of hand pallet trucks from the PRC into the Community, as set out in recitals (60) to (64) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z uvozom ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet iz LRK v Skupnost, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (60) do (64) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Situation of the Community industry
Razmere v industriji Skupnosti
Following the imposition of the provisional measures, one exporting producer questioned the injurious situation of the Community industry by pointing out that the production capacity of the Community industry has increased during the period considered, the development of stocks after 2001 cannot be regarded as a sign of injury but a sign of improvement of the Community industry, the sales price of the hand pallet trucks sold by the Community producers and their market share remained stable in 2003 and during the IP, the profitability of the Community industry increased between 2000 and 2001, the level of investments of the Community industry has more than doubled indicating that it had no problem to raise capital and the stability of wages must be perceived as a positive indicator.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik podvomil v škodljive razmere v industriji Skupnosti z navajanjem, da se je proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju povečala, gibanja zalog po letu 2001 ni mogoče šteti za škodo, temveč za znak izboljšanja v industriji Skupnosti, sta cena prodaje ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet, ki so jih prodali proizvajalci Skupnosti, in njihov tržni delež ostala stabilna v letu 2003 ter med OP, se je donosnost industrije Skupnosti povečala med letoma 2000 in 2001, se je raven naložb industrije Skupnosti več kakor podvojila, kar kaže, da ni imela težav s pridobivanjem kapitala, ter je stabilnost plač treba obravnavati kakor pozitiven pokazatelj.
As regards the argument that the production capacity of the Community industry has increased and this does not indicate injury, it should be noted that whilst the overall increase of production capacity during the period considered was 3 %, it decreased by almost 2 % between 2002 and the IP.
V zvezi z navedbo, da se je proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti povečala in da to ne kaže na škodo, je treba omeniti, da se je kljub skupnemu povečanju proizvodne zmogljivosti med obravnavanim obdobjem za 3 % ta med letom 2002 in obdobjem preiskave zmanjšala za skoraj 2 %.
In fact, the production capacity increased only in the years 2001 and 2002 when investments were made.
Dejansko se je proizvodna zmogljivost povečala samo v letih 2001 in 2002, ko so bile izvedene naložbe.
This development cannot be considered as indicating the absence of injury to the Community industry, in particular when the consumption increased by 17 % during the same period.
Tega razvoja ni mogoče razumeti kakor pokazatelja, da škode v industriji Skupnosti ni, zlasti ker se je poraba v istem obdobju povečala za 17 %.
As regards the argument that the development of stocks after 2001 cannot be regarded as a sign of injury but a sign of improvement of the Community industry, it should be noted that in addition to the explanation provided in recital (67) of the provisional Regulation as to why this factor is not regarded as a particularly relevant indicator of the economic situation of the Community industry, it should be recalled that stocks increased overall by 14 % during the period considered.
V zvezi z navedbo, da gibanja zalog po letu 2001 ni mogoče šteti za znak škode, temveč za znak izboljšanja v industriji Skupnosti, je treba omeniti, da je poleg razlage, predvidene v uvodni izjavi (67) začasne uredbe, zakaj ta dejavnik ni upoštevan kot posebno pomemben pokazatelj gospodarskega stanja v industriji Skupnosti, treba spomniti, da so se zaloge med obravnavanim obdobjem skupno povečale za 14 %.
The fact that there was a peak in 2001 does not alter the finding that stocks may have at least contributed to the injurious situation of the Community industry.
Dejstvo, da je bila leta 2001 dosežena najvišja točka, ne spremeni ugotovitve, da so zaloge vsaj prispevale k škodljivim razmeram v industriji Skupnosti.
As regards the argument that the sales price and the market share of the hand pallet trucks sold by the Community producers remained stable in 2003 and during the IP, it should be noted that the IP includes nine months of 2003.
V zvezi z navedbo, da sta prodajna cena in tržni delež ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet, ki so jih prodali proizvajalci Skupnosti, ostala stabilna v letu 2003 in med obdobjem preiskave, je treba omeniti, da obdobje preiskave vključuje 9 mesecev leta 2003.
It should be noted that the injury analysis covers a period of several years and that both the market share and the sales price of the Community industry declined significantly during the period considered.
Treba je omeniti, da analiza škode zajema obdobje več let in da sta se v obravnavanem obdobju tržni delež ter prodajna cena industrije Skupnosti znatno znižala.
This has not been challenged.
Tega ni nihče izpodbijal.
As regards the argument that the increase in the profitability of the Community industry between 2000 and 2001 does not indicate injury, it should be noted that the profitability increased marginally from 0,28 % in 2000 to 0,51 % in 2001 and then decreased constantly to reach – 2,31 % during the IP.
V zvezi z navedbo, da povečanje dobičkonosnosti industrije Skupnosti med letoma 2000 in 2001 ne kaže na škodo, je treba omeniti, da se je dobičkonosnost zanemarljivo povečala od 0,28 % leta 2000 do 0,51 % leta 2001 in se potem stalno zmanjševala do – 2,31 % med OP.
This is a clear indicator of injury.
To je jasen pokazatelj škode.
As regards the argument that the level of investments of the Community industry has more than doubled and thus it had no problem to raise capital, it is recalled, as explained in recital (76) of the provisional Regulation, that major investments were made in 2001 and 2002 to replace worn-out production facilities in order to allow the Community industry to remain competitive.
V zvezi z navedbo, da se je raven naložb v industriji Skupnosti več kakor podvojila in ta zato ni imela težav s pridobivanjem kapitala, je treba spomniti, kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (76) začasne uredbe, da so bile večje naložbe v letih 2001 in 2002 izvedene, da bi se nadomestile zastarele proizvodne naprave za ohranitev konkurenčnosti industrije Skupnosti.
Investments dropped by 40 % between 2002 and the IP, in parallel with the worsening profitability and this indicated problems in raising capital.
Naložbe so se med letom 2002 in obdobjem preiskave zmanjšale za 40 % vzporedno s poslabšanjem donosnosti in to je pokazalo na težave pri zbiranju kapitala.
This again clearly indicates a state of injury.
To ponovno jasno kaže na stanje škode.
As regards the argument that the stability of wages must be perceived as a positive indicator, it should be noted that this factor should be analysed in the context of development of wages and employment.
V zvezi z navedbo, da je treba stabilnost plač šteti za pozitiven pokazatelj, je treba omeniti, da je treba ta dejavnik analizirati v okviru razvoja plač in zaposlovanja.
The impairment of the industry can be clearly seen in the reduction of number of employees.
Poslabšanje v industriji je jasno vidno pri zmanjšanju števila zaposlenih.
The fact that the Community producers could not increase wages in line with inflation during the period considered due to unfair competition must be considered a negative indicator.
Dejstvo, da proizvajalci Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju plač niso mogli uskladiti z inflacijo zaradi nelojalne konkurence, je treba razumeti kot negativen pokazatelj.
The arguments of this exporting producer analysed in recitals (50) to (56) of this Regulation should, therefore, be rejected.
Navedbe tega proizvajalca izvoznika, analizirane v uvodnih izjavah (50) do (56) te uredbe, se zato zavrnejo.
Certain importers argued that the Community industry has offered hand pallet trucks for sale at prices much lower than any Chinese-made hand pallet trucks and this indicates that it is not being injured.
Določeni uvozniki so trdili, da je industrija Skupnosti ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet dala v prodajo po cenah, ki so bile veliko nižje od katerih koli ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet, narejenih na Kitajskem, in da to kaže, da ni bila oškodovana.
This argument is not supported by the finding of significant price undercutting of over 55 % as set out in recital (64) of the provisional Regulation and, therefore, cannot be accepted.
Te navedbe ne podpira ugotovitev o znatnem nelojalnem nižanju cen za več kakor 55 % (glej uvodno izjavo (64) začasne uredbe) in je zato nesprejemljiva.
In the absence of any other comments, the provisional findings concerning the situation of the Community industry, as set out in recitals (65) to (84) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z razmerami v industriji Skupnosti, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (65) do (84) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In conclusion, as already set out in the provisional Regulation, all relevant injury indicators showed negative trends.
Na koncu, kakor je navedeno v začasni uredbi, so vsi pomembni pokazatelji škode pokazali negativne trende.
In the absence of any other comments, the provisional findings concerning the conclusion on injury set out in recitals (85) to (87) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z zaključki o škodi, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (85) do (87) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
In the absence of any comment concerning the introduction on causation of injury, as set out in recital (88) of the provisional Regulation, the statement is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni nobenih pripomb v zvezi z uvodom glede povzročitve škode, kakor je določeno v uvodni izjavi (88) začasne uredbe, se izjava potrdi.
One exporting producer and certain importers alleged that the use of Eurostat import data are inappropriate in determining the volume and market share of imports of the product concerned since there is no separate CN code for it.
En proizvajalec izvoznik in določeni uvozniki so trdili, da uporaba podatkov Eurostata o uvozu ni ustrezna za določitev obsega in tržnega deleža uvoza zadevnega izdelka, saj zanj ni posebne oznake KN.
They argued that other products are also covered by the two CN codes in question, one covering the complete product and the other parts, and thus such Eurostat data cannot give an accurate picture of the effect of the dumped imports.
Trdili so, da so tudi drugi izdelki zajeti pod obema zadevnima oznakama KN, od katerih ena zajema popoln izdelek in druga dele, ter zato taki podatki Eurostata ne morejo dati točne slike učinka dampinškega uvoza.
It is noted that no evidence has been submitted indicating that any significant quantities of other products may have been classified under the CN code 84279000, which covers the complete product and which was used to determine the dumped imports volume.
Ugotavlja se, da ni bil predložen noben dokaz, ki bi navajal, da bi bile katere koli znatne količine drugih izdelkov razvrščene pod oznako KN 84279000, ki zajema popoln izdelek in je bila uporabljena za določitev obsega dampinškega uvoza.
In fact, the same interested parties used Eurostat import data from the same CN code to substantiate their claim concerning the trends of imports of hand pallet trucks from other third countries.
Dejansko so iste zainteresirane stranke uporabile podatke Eurostata o uvozu pod isto oznako KN za podporo svoje navedbe v zvezi s trendi glede uvoza ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet iz drugih tretjih držav.
It is also considered, that given the narrow definition of the CN code, the vast majority of products entering the Community under this heading are imports of the product concerned.
Šteje se tudi, da glede na ozko opredelitev oznake KN velika večina izdelkov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost pod to tarifno številko, predstavlja uvoz zadevnega izdelka.
As to other CN code 84312000 covering parts for use solely or principally with the machinery of heading 8427, it is noted that the imports reported by Eurostat for this code are small and have not been taken into account when establishing the volume and the market share of the imports of the product concerned.
Glede druge oznake KN 84312000, ki zajema dele za izključno ali pretežno uporabo s stroji pod tarifno številko 8427, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je uvoz, ki ga je sporočil Eurostat za to oznako, majhen in ni bil upoštevan pri določitvi obsega in tržnega deleža uvoza zadevnega izdelka.
In the absence of any other comment, the provisional findings concerning the effect of the dumped imports, set out in recitals (89) to (91) of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z učinkom dampinškega uvoza, navedene v uvodnih izjavah (89) do (91) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, one exporting producer argued that the export performance of the Community industry had been wrongly evaluated.
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je en proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je bil izvoz industrije Skupnosti napačno ocenjen.
Export sales were found to have fallen by nearly 50 % between 2000 and the IP, having a significant impact on the Community industry’s performance.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je med letom 2000 in obdobjem preiskave izvozna prodaja padla za skoraj 50 % ter znatno vplivala na industrijo Skupnosti.