natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
serological tests for classical swine fever have been carried out with negative results on samples collected from the consignment of pigs to be dispatched, during the seven-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch; the minimum number of pigs to be sampled must be sufficient to allow for the detection of 10 % seroprevalence with 95 % confidence in the consignment of pigs to be dispatched.
kjer so bili v sedmih dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem opravljeni serološki testi za klasično prašičjo kugo z negativnimi rezultati na vzorcih, ki so bili odvzeti od skupine prašičev, namenjenih za odpošiljanje; najmanjše število prašičev za vzorčenje mora biti zadostno, da se v skupini prašičev, namenjenih za odpošiljanje, omogoči odkrivanje 10-odstotne serološke obolelosti s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja.
However, point (c) shall not apply to pigs to be dispatched directly to slaughterhouses for the purpose of immediate slaughter.
Vendar se (c) ne uporablja za prašiče, ki jih je treba odposlati neposredno v klavnice zaradi takojšnjega zakola.
When dispatching the pigs referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, the Member States concerned shall ensure that the health certificate referred to in point (a) of Article 6 includes additional information concerning the dates of the clinical examination, sampling and serological testing as provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, the number of samples tested, the type of test used and the results of the tests.
Pri odpošiljanju prašičev iz odstavka 1 tega člena zadevne države članice zagotovijo, da zdravstveno spričevalo iz člena 6(a) vključuje dodatne podatke o datumih kliničnega pregleda, vzorčenja in serološkega testiranja, ki jih predvideva odstavek 1 navedenega člena, številu testiranih vzorcev, vrsti uporabljenega testa in rezultatih testa.
Derogations concerning certain consignments from areas listed in Part III of the Annex
Odstopanja, ki zadevajo nekatere pošiljke z območij, navedenih v delu III Priloge
By way of derogation from Article 5, the Member States concerned with areas listed in Part III of the Annex may authorise the dispatch of fresh meat of pigs, and meat products and preparations consisting of, or containing meat of pigs from holdings located in those areas, to other Member States if the products:
Z odstopanjem od člena 5 lahko zadevne države članice z območji, navedenimi v delu III Priloge, dovolijo odpošiljanje svežega prašičjega mesa, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih izdelkov, ki so sestavljeni iz prašičjega mesa ali vsebujejo prašičje meso z gospodarstev na navedenih območjih, v druge države članice, če so izdelki:
have been produced and processed in compliance with Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2002/99/EC;
bili proizvedeni in obdelani v skladu s členom 4(1) Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES;
are subjected to the veterinary certification in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 2002/99/EC; and
predmet veterinarskih spričeval v skladu s členom 5 Direktive 2002/99/ES ter
are accompanied by the appropriate intra-Community trade health certificate as laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2004 of which Part II shall be completed by the following:
jih spremlja ustrezno zdravstveno spričevalo za trgovino znotraj Skupnosti, ki ga določa Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 599/2004, katere del II se dopolni z naslednjim besedilom:
‘Product in accordance with Commission Decision 2006/805/EC of 24 November 2006 concerning animal health control measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States.’
„Izdelek v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2006/805/ES z dne 24. novembra 2006 glede nadzornih ukrepov za zdravje živali v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah.“
Information requirements of the Member States concerned
Zahteve po informacijah za zadevne države članice
The Member States concerned shall inform the Commission and the Member States, in the framework of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, of the results of the sero-surveillance for classical swine fever carried out in the areas listed in the Annex, as provided for in the plans for the eradication of classical swine fever or in emergency vaccination plans against that disease approved by the Commission and referred to in the second paragraph of Article 1.
Zadevne države članice v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali obvestijo Komisijo in države članice o rezultatih serološkega nadzora za klasično prašičjo kugo, ki so bili opravljeni na območjih, navedenih v Prilogi, kakor je to predvideno v načrtih za izkoreninjenje klasične prašičje kuge ali cepljenje proti tej bolezni v izrednih okoliščinah, odobrenih s strani Komisije in navedenih v drugem odstavku člena 1.
Decision 2003/526/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2003/526/ES se razveljavi.
Article14
Člen14
Done at Brussels, 24 November 2006.
V Bruslju, 24. novembra 2006
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33); corrected version (OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33).
Directive as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/327/EC (OJ L 120, 5.5.2006, p. 24).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/327/ES (UL L 120, 5.5.2006, str. 24).
OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 206; corrected version (OJ L 226, 25.6.2004, p. 83).
UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str. 206.
OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 55; corrected version (OJ L 226, 25.6.2004, p. 22).
UL L 139, 30.4.2004, str. 55.
In the ‘Eifel’ part:
v delu „Eifel“:
the Kreis: Südliche Weinstraße;
v okrožju: Südliche Weinstraße;
in the Kreis Südwestpfalz: the municipalities Waldfischbach-Burgalben, Rodalben, Hauenstein, Dahner-Felsenland, Pirmasens-Land and Thaleischweiler-Fröschen, the localities Schmitshausen, Herschberg, Schauerberg, Weselberg, Obernheim-Kirchenarnbach, Hettenhausen, Saalstadt, Wallhalben and Knopp-Labach.
v okrožju Südwestpfalz: občine Waldfischbach – Burgalben, Rodalben, Hauenstein, Dahner – Felsenland, Pirmasens – Land in Thaleischweiler – Fröschen, kraji Schmitshausen, Herschberg, Schauerberg, Weselberg, Obernheim – Kirchenarnbach, Hettenhausen, Saalstadt, Wallhalben in Knopp – Labach.
In the ‘Pfalz’ part:
V delu „Pfalz“:
the Kreise: Ahrweiler and Daun;
okrožja: Ahrweiler in Daun;
in the Kreis Bitburg-Prüm: the municipality Prüm, the localities Burbach, Balesfeld and Neuheilenbach (in the municipality Kyllburg);
v okrožju Bitburg – Prüm: občina Prüm, kraji Burbach, Balesfeld in Neuheilenbach (v občini Kyllburg);
in the Kreis Cochem-Zell: the municipalities Kaisersesch and Ulmen;
v okrožju Cochem – Zell: občini Kaisersesch in Ulmen;
in the Kreis Mayen-Koblenz: the municipality Vordereifel, the municipality Mendig in the west of the motorway A 61 and the Bundesstrasse B 262 and the city Mayen in the west of the Bundesstrasse B 262 and in the north of the Bundesstrasse 258.
v okrožju Mayen – Koblenz: občina Vordereifel, občina Mending zahodno od avtoceste A 61 in magistralne ceste B 262 in mesto Mayen zahodno od magistralne ceste B 262 in severno od magistralne ceste 258.
North Rhine-Westfalia
Severno Porenje-Vestfalija
in the Kreis Rhein-Sieg: the cities Meckenheim and Rheinbach, the municipality Wachtberg, the localities Witterschlick, Volmershofen, Heidgen (in the municipality Alfter) and the localities Buschhoven, Morenhoven, Miel and Odendorf (in the municipality Swisttal);
v okrožju Rhein - Sieg: mesti Meckenheim in Rheinbach, občina Wachtberg, kraji Witterschlick, Volmershofen, Heidgen (v občini Alfter) in kraji Buschhoven, Morenhoven, Miel in Odendorf (v občini Swisttal);
the city Aachen: south of the motorways A4, A544 and the Bundesstrasse B1;
mesto Aachen: južno od avtocest A 4, A 544 in magistralne ceste B1;
in the Kreis Düren: the cities Heimbach and Nideggen, the municipalities Hürtgenwald and Langerwehe.
v okrožju Aachen: mesti Monschau in Stolberg, občini Simmerath in Roetgen;
France:
v okrožju Düren: mesti Heimbach in Nideggen, občini Hürtgenwald in Langerwehe;
The territory of the Department of Bas-Rhin and Moselle located west of the Rhine and the channel Rhine Marne, north of the motorway A 4, east of the river Sarre and south of the border with Germany and the municipalities Holtzheim, Lingolsheim and Eckbolsheim.
Francija: Ozemlje departmajev Bas-Rhin in Moselle, ki leži zahodno od Rena in kanala Ren-Marna, severno od avtoceste A4, vzhodno od reke Saare in južno od meje z Nemčijo, ter občine Holtzheim, Lingolsheim in Eckbolsheim.
Slovakia:
Slovaška:
The territory of the District Veterinary and Food Administrations (DVFA) of Trenčín (comprising Trenčín and Bánovce nad Bebravou districts), Prievidza (comprising Prievidza and Partizánske districts), Púchov (comprising Ilava district only), Žiar nad Hronom (comprising Žiar nad Hronom, Žarnovica and Banská Štiavnica districts), Zvolen (comprising Zvolen, Krupina and Detva districts), Lučenec (comprising Lučenec and Poltár districts) and Veľký Krtíš.
Območja Okrožnih uprav za veterino in prehrano (DVFA) Trenčín (obsega okrožji Trenčín in Bánovce nad Bebravou), Prievidza (obsega okrožji Prievidza in Partizánske), Púchov (obsega samo okrožje Ilava), Žiar nad Hronom (obsega okrožja Žiar nad Hronom, Žarnovica in Banská Štiavnic), Zvolen (obsega okrožja Zvolen, Krupina in Detva), Lučenec (obsega okrožji Lučenec in Poltár) in Veľký Krtíš.
Bulgaria:
Bolgarija:
the city Bonn: south of the Bundesstrasse 56 and the motorway A 565 (Bonn-Endenich to Bonn-Poppelsdorf) and southwest of the Bundesstrasse 9; (e) in the Kreis Aachen: the cities Monschau and Stolberg, the municipalities Simmerath and Roetgen;
mesto Bonn: južno od magistralne ceste 56 in avtoceste A 565 (Bonn – Endenich do Bonn – Poppelsdorf) in jugozahodno od magistralne ceste 9;
recognising in principle the completeness of the dossier submitted for detailed examination in view of the possible inclusion of orthosulfamuron in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC
o načelnem priznavanju popolnosti dokumentacije, predložene v podroben pregled zaradi možne vključitve ortosulfamurona v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS
(notified under document number C(2006) 5539)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 5539)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], and in particular Article 6(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1] in zlasti člena 6(3) Direktive,
A dossier for the active substance orthosulfamuron was submitted by Isagro SpA to the authorities of Italy on 4 July 2005 with an application to obtain its inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Isagro SpA je 4. julija 2005 italijanskim organom predložil dokumentacijo za aktivno snov ortosulfamuron z zahtevkom za vključitev zadevne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The authorities of Italy have indicated to the Commission that, on preliminary examination, the dossier for the active substance concerned appears to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Pristojni organi Italije so Komisiji sporočili, da se po predhodni proučitvi dokumentacije za zadevno aktivno snov zdi, da izpolnjuje zahteve o podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
The dossier submitted appears also to satisfy the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned.
Poleg tega organi menijo, da predložena dokumentacija izpolnjuje zahteve glede podatkov in informacij iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS za eno fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje zadevno aktivno snov.
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossier was subsequently forwarded by the applicant to the Commission and other Member States, and was referred to the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je vlagatelj dokumentacijo naknadno poslal Komisiji in drugim državam članicam, predložena pa je bila tudi Stalnemu odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali.
By this Decision it should be formally confirmed at Community level that the dossier is considered as satisfying in principle the data and information requirements provided for in Annex II and, for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance concerned, the requirements set out in Annex III to Directive 91/414/EEC.
S to odločbo mora biti na ravni Skupnosti uradno potrjeno, da dokumentacija načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II, in da za najmanj eno fitofarmacevtsko sredstvo, ki vsebuje zadevno aktivno snov, izpolnjuje zahteve iz Priloge III k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Without prejudice to Article 6(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC, the dossier concerning the active substance identified in the Annex to this Decision, which was submitted to the Commission and the Member States with a view to obtaining the inclusion of this substance in Annex I to that Directive, satisfies in principle the data and information requirements set out in Annex II to that Directive.
Brez poseganja v člen 6(4) Direktive 91/414/EGS dokumentacija o aktivni snovi, opredeljeni v Prilogi k tej odločbi, ki je bila predložena Komisiji in državam članicam zaradi vključitve te snovi v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge II k navedeni direktivi.
The dossier also satisfies the data and information requirements set out in Annex III to that Directive in respect of one plant protection product containing the active substance, taking into account the uses proposed.
Dokumentacija izpolnjuje tudi zahteve po podatkih in informacijah iz Priloge III k navedeni direktivi v zvezi z enim fitofarmacevtskim sredstvom, ki vsebuje aktivno snov, ob upoštevanju predlaganih načinov uporabe.
The rapporteur Member State shall pursue the detailed examination for the dossier concerned and shall report the conclusions of its examinations accompanied by any recommendations on the inclusion or non-inclusion of the active substance concerned in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and any conditions related thereto to the European Commission as soon as possible and at the latest within a period of one year from the date of publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Države članice poročevalke podrobno pregledajo zadevno dokumentacijo ter čim prej in najpozneje v enem letu od dneva objave te odločbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije poročajo Evropski komisiji o ugotovitvah svojih pregledov, skupaj s priporočili o vključitvi ali nevključitvi zadevne aktivne snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS in o vseh s tem povezanih pogojih.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/85/EC (OJ L 293, 24.10.2006, p. 3).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2006/85/ES (UL L 293, 24.10.2006, str. 3).
Active substance concerned by this Decision
Aktivna snov, ki jo zadeva ta odločba
CIPAC No not yet allocated
Številka CIPAC še ni dodeljena
4 July 2005
julij 2005
Council Decision 2006/807/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2006/807/SZVP
of 20 November 2006
z dne 20. novembra 2006
implementing Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories
o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 2005/797/SZVP o Policijski misiji Evropske unije za Palestinska ozemlja
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP of 14 November 2005 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories [1], and in particular Article 14(2) thereof, in conjunction with the second indent of the first subparagraph of Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2005/797/SZVP z dne 14. novembra 2005 o Policijski misiji Evropske unije za Palestinska ozemlja [1] in zlasti člena 14(2) Skupnega ukrepa v povezavi z drugo alineo prvega pododstavka člena 23(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
By Joint Action 2005/797/CFSP the Council established a European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian territories (hereinafter EUPOL COPPS) for a period of three years.
Svet je s Skupnim ukrepom 2005/797/SZVP ustanovil Policijsko misijo Evropske unije za Palestinska ozemlja (v nadaljnjem besedilu „EUPOL COPPS“) za obdobje 3 let.
The operational phase of the EUPOL COPPS started on 1 January 2006.
Operativna faza EUPOL COPPS se je začela 1. januarja 2006.
In accordance with Article 14(2) of that Joint Action, the final budget of EUPOL COPPS for the year 2007 should be decided,
V skladu s členom 14(2) Skupnega ukrepa 2005/797/SZVP bi bilo treba določiti končni proračun EUPOL COPPS za leto 2007 –
The final budget of EUPOL COPPS for the period from 1 January until 31 December 2007 shall be EUR 2800000.
Končni proračun EUPOL COPPS za obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2007 znaša 2800000 EUR.
Done at Brussels, 20 November 2006.
V Bruslju, 20. novembra 2006
amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the Pericles programme)
o spremembah in podaljšanju Sklepa 2001/923/ES o vzpostavitvi programa izmenjave, pomoči in usposabljanja za zaščito eura proti ponarejanju (program „Pericles“)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the third sentence of Article 123(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti tretjega stavka člena 123(4) Pogodbe,
Article 13(3)(a) of Council Decision 2001/923/EC [2] provided that the Commission was to send to the European Parliament and to the Council by 30 June 2005 a report that was independent of the programme manager, evaluating the relevance, the efficiency and the effectiveness of the programme and a communication on whether this programme should be continued and adapted, accompanied by an appropriate proposal.
V členu 13(3)(a) Sklepa Sveta 2001/923/ES [2] je bilo predvideno, da mora Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poslati do 30. junija 2005 poročilo, ki je neodvisno od izvajalca programa, v katerem se ovrednoti ustreznost, učinkovitost in uspešnost programa, in sporočilo, ali naj se program nadaljuje in prilagodi, opremljeno z ustreznim predlogom.
The evaluation report provided for in Article 13 of that Decision was issued on 30 November 2004.
Poročilo o oceni iz člena 13 navedenega sklepa je bilo izdano 30. novembra 2004.
It concluded that the programme had achieved its objectives and recommended its continuation.
V poročilu se je zaključilo, da je program dosegal svoje cilje in predlagano je bilo njegovo nadaljevanje.
A financial reference amount, within the meaning of point 38 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [3] is included in this Decision for the entire duration of the programme, without thereby affecting the powers of the budgetary authority as they are defined by the Treaty.
Referenčna finančna vsota v smislu točke 38 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju [3] je vključena v ta sklep za celotno obdobje programa, ne da bi to vplivalo na pristojnosti proračunskega organa, kot so opredeljene v Pogodbi.
The continuation of the programme reflects the need for continuing vigilance, training and technical assistance necessary to sustain the protection of the euro against counterfeiting, by providing a stable framework for the planning of Member States programmes, particularly over a period during which new countries adopt the single currency.
Nadaljevanje programa odraža potrebo po neprestanem nadzoru, usposabljanju in tehnični pomoči za zaščito eura pred ponarejanjem z zagotovitvijo stabilnega okvira za načrtovanje programov držav članic, zlasti v obdobju, ko bodo nove države članice sprejele enotno valuto.
In this spirit, the Commission submitted on 8 April 2005 a proposal for the continuation of the Pericles programme [4] until 31 December 2011.
V tem smislu je Komisija 8. aprila 2005 predložila predlog za nadaljevanje programa „Pericles“ [4] do 31. decembra 2011.
Pending final agreement on the Community Financial Framework for 2007-2013, the Council decided to extend the Pericles programme for the year 2006.
Dokler ni dosežen končni dogovor o finančnem okviru Skupnosti za obdobje 2007–2013 se je Svet odločil podaljšati program Pericles za leto 2006.
In its declaration of 30 January 2006 the Council considered that the Pericles programme has a multi-annual nature and that it should be extended to 2011.
V svoji izjavi z dne 30. januarja 2006 je Svet menil, da je program Pericles večletnega značaja in bi ga bilo treba podaljšati do leta 2011.
To this effect, it invited the Commission to present a proposal for extending the programme for the period starting from 2007, as soon as an agreement on the Financial Framework for 2007-2013 had been reached.
Zato je Komisijo pozval, naj predloži predlog za podaljšanje programa za obdobje, ki se začne leta 2007, in sicer takoj, ko bo dosežen dogovor o prihodnjem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013.
It is appropriate that the Community programmes be in line with the Community's Financial Framework.
Primerno je, da so programi Skupnosti usklajeni s finančnim okvirom Skupnosti.
In order to avoid overlaps and to ensure consistency and complementarity of actions under the Pericles programme, it is important to develop synergies between actions financed by the Commission, the European Central Bank and Europol.
Da bi se izognili prekrivanju ter zagotovili usklajenost in dopolnjevanje ukrepov v okviru programa Pericles, je pomembno razvijati medsebojno dopolnjevanje med ukrepi, ki jih financirajo Komisija, Evropska centralna banka in Europol.
Consequently, and in view of the need for continuous training and assistance for the protection of the euro, the Pericles programme should be extended until 31 December 2013.
Na podlagi navedenega in ob upoštevanju potrebe po nenehnem usposabljanju in pomoči za zaščito eura je treba program Pericles podaljšati do 31. decembra 2013.
Decision 2001/923/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
Zato je treba ustrezno spremeniti Sklep 2001/923/ES –
Decision 2001/923/EC is amended as follows:
Sklep 2001/923/ES se spremeni, kakor sledi:
in Article 1(2), the last sentence shall be replaced by the following:
Zadnji stavek člena 1(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘It shall run from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2013.’;
„Traja od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2013.“;
the following subparagraph is added at the end of Article 6:
Na koncu člena 6 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘The financial reference amount for the implementation of the Community programme of action for the period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013 shall be EUR 7000000.’;
„Referenčna finančna vsota za izvedbo akcijskega programa Skupnosti v obdobju od 1. januarja 2007 do 31. decembra 2013 znaša 7000000 EUR.“;
Article 13(3) shall be amended as follows:
Člen 13(3) se spremeni, kakor sledi:
in point (a), ‘30 June 2005’ is replaced by ‘30 June 2013’;
v točki (a) se referenčni datum „30. junija 2005“ nadomesti s „30. junija 2013“;
on completion of the initial and the additional periods of the programme and no later than 30 June 2006 and 2014 respectively, detailed reports on the implementation and the results of the programme setting out in particular the added value of the Community's financial assistance.’
ob zaključku začetnega in poznejših obdobij programa in najpozneje do 30. junija 2006 in 2014, kakor je ustrezno, podrobni poročili o izvedbi in rezultatih programa, v katerem je opredeljena zlasti dodana vrednost finančne pomoči Skupnosti.“.