natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bilo omogočeno, da v pisni obliki predstavijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the large number of Community producers and of importers in the Community not related to an exporting producer in one of the countries concerned, it was considered appropriate, in conformity with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, to examine whether sampling should be used.
Glede na veliko število proizvajalcev Skupnosti in uvoznikov v Skupnosti, ki niso povezani s proizvajalcem izvoznikom v eni od zadevnih držav, se je zdelo ustrezno, da se v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe preuči, ali se mora vzorec uporabiti.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would indeed be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the above parties were requested, pursuant to Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, to make themselves known within two weeks of the initiation of the proceeding and to provide the Commission with the information requested in the notice of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje resnično potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bile zgoraj navedene stranke pozvane, da se v skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe v dveh tednih po začetku postopka javijo Komisiji in predložijo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku.
Seventeen Community producers properly completed the sampling form within the deadline and formally agreed to cooperate further in the investigation.
Sedemnajst proizvajalcev Skupnosti je obrazec za vzorčenje pravilno izpolnilo v roku in se uradno strinjalo, da bodo pri preiskavi še naprej sodelovali.
The sampling form requested, inter alia, information concerning the development of certain ‘macro’ injury indicators, namely production capacity, production volume, stocks, sales volumes and employment.
V obrazcu za vzorčenje so bile med drugim zahtevane informacije, ki zadevajo razvoj nekaterih „makro“ kazalcev škode, namreč proizvodno zmogljivost, obseg proizvodnje, zaloge, obseg prodaje in zaposlovanje.
From the above 17 producers, 5 companies, which were found to be representative of the Community industry in terms of volume of production and sales of the product concerned in the Community, were selected for the sample.
Od sedemnajstih zgoraj omenjenih proizvajalcev je bilo za vzorec izbranih pet družb, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so v smislu obsega proizvodnje in prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti predstavniki industrije Skupnosti.
Only one importer provided the information requested in the notice of initiation and expressed its willingness to further cooperate with the Commission services.
Le en uvoznik je predložil informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, in izrazil pripravljenost za nadaljnje sodelovanje s službami Komisije.
In view of this situation, the Commission services decided not to apply sampling in the case of the unrelated importers, but to send a questionnaire to the aforementioned importer.
Glede na te okoliščine so se službe Komisije odločile, da vzorca ne bodo uporabile v primeru nepovezanih uvoznikov, ampak bodo zgoraj omenjenemu uvozniku poslale vprašalnik.
Subsequently, the said importer failed to complete the questionnaire.
Vendar pozneje zadevni uvoznik ni izpolnil vprašalnika.
It is therefore considered that no cooperation could be obtained from the unrelated importers.
Zato se šteje, da nepovezani uvozniki niso sodelovali.
The Association representing the interests of the importers (EWRIA) made comments of a general nature, notably on the definition of the product concerned and the like product.
Združenje, ki predstavlja interese uvoznikov („EWRIA“), je dalo splošne pripombe, predvsem glede opredelitve zadevnega in podobnega izdelka.
These comments are addressed under recitals (19) and (20).
Te pripombe so obravnavane v uvodnih izjavah (19) in (20).
Questionnaires were therefore sent to the five sampled Community producers and to all known exporting producers.
Komisija je zato poslala vprašalnike petim vzorčenim proizvajalcem Skupnosti in vsem znanim proizvajalcem izvoznikom.
In addition, one producer in Turkey (analogue country) was contacted and received a questionnaire.
Poleg tega je Komisija stopila v stik z enim proizvajalcem v Turčiji („primerljiva država“) in mu poslala vprašalnik.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from the five sampled Community producers and three exporting producers in the countries concerned, as well as from two related importers and one producer in the analogue country.
Komisija je prejela odgovore na vprašalnike petih vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti in treh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v zadevnih državah, kakor tudi od dveh povezanih uvoznikov in enega proizvajalca v primerljivi državi.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
V ta namen so bili opravljeni preveritveni obiski v naslednjih družbah:
Sampled Community producers:
Vzorčeni proizvajalci Skupnosti:
BTS Drahtseile GmbH (Germany),
BTS Drahtseile GmbH (Nemčija),
Cables y Alambres especiales, SA (Spain),
Cables y Alambres especiales, SA (Španija),
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH (Germany),
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH (Nemčija),
Trefileurope (France).
Trefileurope, (Francija).
Producer in the exporting country:
Proizvajalec v državi izvoznici:
Usha Martin Ltd (India).
Usha Martin Ltd. (Indija).
Usha Martin UK (United Kingdom),
Usha Martin UK (Združeno kraljestvo),
Usha Martin Scandinavia (Denmark).
Usha Martin Scandinavia (Danska).
Producer in the analogue country:
Proizvajalec v primerljivi državi:
Celik Halat (Turkey).
Celik Halat (Turčija).
The investigation regarding the continuation and/or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 (investigation period or IP).
Preiskava glede nadaljevanja in/ali ponovnega pojava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2003 do 30. junija 2004 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 up to the end of the IP (period considered).
Preučitev gibanj, ki so pomembna za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovnega pojava škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is the same as that in the original investigation which led to the imposition of measures currently in force, i.e. steel ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, excluding ropes and cables of stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm. They are currently classifiable within CN codes ex73121082, ex73121084, ex73121086, ex73121088 and ex73121099.
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v prvotni preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe trenutno veljavnih ukrepov, to so jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, razen vrvi in kablov iz nerjavnega jekla, z največjim prečnim prerezom več kot 3 mm. Trenutno so uvrščeni pod oznake KN ex73121082, ex73121084, ex73121086, ex73121088 in ex73121099.
As established in the original investigation, this review investigation confirmed that the product concerned and the products manufactured and sold by the exporting producers on the domestic market, as well as those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market and by the producer in the analogue country on the domestic market of the analogue country have the same basic physical characteristics and end uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno v prvotni preiskavi, je preiskava v zvezi s pregledom potrdila, da imajo zadevni izdelek in izdelki, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci izvozniki na domačem trgu, kakor tudi tisti izdelki, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, ter proizvajalec v primerljivi državi na domačem trgu primerljive države, enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti ter končne uporabe, zato se štejejo za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
EWRIA reiterated the argument made in the original investigation that the product concerned differs substantially from the products manufactured and sold in the Community, and should not be compared.
Združenje EWRIA je ponovno navedlo utemeljitev iz prvotne preiskave, da se zadevni izdelek bistveno razlikuje od tistih izdelkov, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo v Skupnosti, in se jih ne sme primerjati.
The argument has been addressed in depth in the original Regulations imposing provisional and definitive measures on imports of the product concerned and it was found that the Community-produced and imported SWR were alike.
Utemeljitev je bila podrobneje obravnavana v prvotnih uredbah, ki uvajajo začasne in dokončne ukrepe na uvoz zadevnega izdelka, in ugotovljeno je bilo, da sta v Skupnosti proizveden JŽV in uvožen JŽV podobna.
As EWRIA did not bring any new element showing that the basis on which these original findings were made had changed, the conclusions reached in the original definitive Regulation are confirmed.
Ker združenje EWRIA ni predložilo novih elementov, ki bi pokazali, da se je osnova, na kateri temeljijo prvine prvotne ugotovitve, spremenila, se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve iz končne uredbe.
LIKELIHOOD OF A CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITEV DAMPINGA
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was currently taking place and, if so, whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo preverjeno, ali je damping trenutno prisoten in ali se bo v tem primeru zaradi izteka veljavnosti ukrepov nadaljeval.
During the IP, the total import volume, as recorded in Eurostat, of steel wire ropes from the PRC, India, South Africa and Ukraine (the countries concerned) amounted to 7784 tonnes, representing 4,4 % of the Community market share.
Po podatkih Eurostata je med OP celoten obseg uvoza jeklenih vrvi iz LRK, Indije, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine („zadevne države“) znašal 7784 ton, kar predstavlja 4,4 % tržnega deleža Skupnosti.
The investigation period of the original investigation covered 15 months (1 January 1997 to 31 March 1998) and only covered imports into the Community prior to Enlargement.
Obdobje preiskave prvotne preiskave je zajemalo 15 mesecev (1. januar 1997 do 31. marca 1998) in je zajelo le uvoz v Skupnost pred širitvijo.
Therefore, import figures from the original investigation period and the IP are not directly comparable.
Zato številke glede uvoza iz obdobja prvotne preiskave in OP niso neposredno primerljive.
In any case, total imports in EU-15 of the countries concerned in the original investigation period amounted to 21102 tonnes, representing 14,3 % of the Community market share.
V vsakem primeru je celoten uvoz zadevnih držav v EU-15 v obdobju prvotne preiskave znašal 21102 toni, kar predstavlja 14,3 % tržnega deleža Skupnosti.
In India one exporting producer cooperated, covering 75 % of the export volumes recorded in Eurostat.
V Indiji je sodeloval en proizvajalec izvoznik, ki po podatkih Eurostata zajema 75 % obsega izvoza.
In South Africa, the sole known exporting producer submitted information on its export sales to the Community during the IP, which represented all export sales of South Africa to the Community during the same period.
V Južni Afriki je edini znani proizvajalec izvoznik predložil informacije o svojem izvozu med OP, kar je v istem obdobju predstavljalo celoten izvoz Južne Afrike v Skupnost.
As regards the PRC, one exporting producer cooperated which represented 75 % of export sales of the product concerned from the PRC to the Community.
Sodeloval je en proizvajalec izvoznik iz LRK, ki predstavlja 75 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v Skupnost.
Finally, as regards Ukraine, none of the two known exporting producers cooperated in the present investigation.
Kar zadeva Ukrajino, pa v sedanji preiskavi ni sodeloval noben od dveh znanih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
Dumping of imports during the investigation period
Damping uvoza med obdobjem preiskave
In accordance with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, the same methodology was used as in the original investigation, whenever circumstances have not changed.
V skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe se je, kadar se okoliščine niso spremenile, uporabljala enaka metodologija kot v prvotni preiskavi.
During the IP, the total import volume, as recorded in Eurostat, of SWR from India amounted to 3869 tonnes, representing 2,2 % of the Community market share.
Po podatkih Eurostata je med OP celoten obseg uvoza JŽV iz Indije znašal 3869 ton, kar predstavlja 2,2 % tržnega deleža Skupnosti.
As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, it was first established for the cooperating Indian exporting producer whether its total domestic sales of the like product were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community.
Kar zadeva določitev normalne vrednosti, je bilo za sodelujočega indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika ugotovljeno, ali je njegova celotna domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna, to pomeni, ali celotni obseg te prodaje predstavlja vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega izvoza v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, this was found to be the case.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo ugotovljeno, da to za ta primer velja.
Further to the disclosure, the cooperating Indian exporting producer objected to the method used by the Commission.
Na podlagi razkritij je sodelujoči indijski proizvajalec izvoznik nasprotoval metodi, ki jo je uporabila Komisija.
He argued that for the representativity test the sales volume of the product concerned to the first independent customer in the Community and not to the related importer in the Community should have been used.
Trdil je, da bi moral biti za preskus reprezentativnosti uporabljen obseg prodaje zadevnega izdelka prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti in ne povezanemu uvozniku v Skupnosti.
However, Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation provides that for the determination whether domestic sales of the like product were representative, the domestic sales volume should be compared to the sales volume of the product concerned exported to the Community, without specifying whether export sales to the first independent customer or export sales to the related importer should be taken into consideration.
Vendar člen 2(2) osnovne uredbe določa, da je treba za določitev, ali je bila domača prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna, primerjati obseg domače prodaje z obsegom prodaje zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost, brez opredelitve, ali je treba upoštevati izvoz prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu ali izvoz povezanemu uvozniku.
Consequently, it was found that the method used by the Commission was reasonable and in line with the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila metoda, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, razumna in v skladu z osnovno uredbo.
Therefore this claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba ta zahtevek zavrniti.
The Commission subsequently identified those product types, sold domestically by the company concerned, that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je nato opredelila tiste vrste izdelka, ki jih je zadevna družba prodala na domačem trgu in ki so enake ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by the exporting producer on its domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the type of SWR sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki jo je proizvajalec izvoznik prodal na svojem domačem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto JŽV, ki je bila prodana za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type of SWR were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable type of SWR exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določene vrste JŽV se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste med OP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste JŽV, izvožene v Skupnost.
This was the case for 31 % of all types exported to the Community.
To je veljalo za 31 % vseh izvoženih vrst izdelka v Skupnost.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each product type, sold domestically in representative quantities, could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the product type in question.
Preučeno je bilo tudi, ali se lahko domača prodaja vsake vrste izdelka, prodanega na domačem trgu v reprezentativnih količinah, šteje kot prodaja, opravljena v običajnem poteku trgovine, pri čemer je določen delež dobičkonosne prodaje neodvisnim strankam zadevne vrste izdelka.
In cases where the sales volume of a product type, sold at a net sales price equal to or above the calculated cost of production, represented more than 80 % of the total sales volume of that type, and where the weighted average price of that type was equal to or above the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of that type made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
V primerih, ko je obseg prodaje zadevne vrste, prodane po neto prodajni ceni, ki je enaka izračunanim proizvodnim stroškom ali višja od njih, predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste in je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste enaka ali višja od stroškov proizvodnje, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje te vrste v OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
In cases where the volume of profitable sales of a product type represented 80 % or less of the total sales volume of that type, or where the weighted average price of that type was below the cost of production, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of profitable sales of that type only, provided that these sales represented 10 % or more of the total sales volume of that type.
V primerih, ko je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje vrste izdelka predstavljal 80 % ali manj celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste, ali je bila tehtana povprečna cena te vrste nižja od proizvodnih stroškov, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje dobičkonosne prodaje samo te vrste, pod pogojem, da je ta prodaja predstavljala 10 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje te vrste.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular product type sold by an exporting producer could not be used in order to establish normal value either because they had not been sold on the domestic market or not in the ordinary course of trade, another method had to be applied.
Kadar domače cene določene vrste izdelka, ki ga je prodal proizvajalec izvoznik, niso mogle biti uporabljene za določitev normalne vrednosti, ker te vrste izdelka niso bile prodane na domačem trgu ali v običajnem poteku trgovine, je bilo treba uporabiti drugo metodo.
In the absence of any other reasonable method, constructed normal value was used.
Ker ni bilo na voljo nobene druge razumne metode, je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost.
In all cases where constructed normal value was used and in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the manufacturing costs of the exported types, a reasonable percentage for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
V vseh primerih, kjer je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost in v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da je bil proizvodnim stroškom za izvožene vrste dodan razumen odstotek za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške („PSA stroški“) in primerna stopnja dobička.
In this regard and in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, the amounts for SG&A and profits were based on actual data pertaining to the production and sale, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product on the domestic market.
Glede na to in v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe so zneski za PSA stroške in dobički temeljili na dejanskih informacijah glede proizvodnje in prodaje podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu v običajnem poteku trgovine.
Further to the disclosure the cooperating Indian exporting producer argued that when calculating its domestic profit margin in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation, the Commission wrongly included domestic sales of products outside the scope of the investigation, i.e. locked coil wire ropes.
Po razkritju je sodelujoči indijski proizvajalec izvoznik trdil, da je Komisija pri izračunu njegove domače stopnje dobička v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe narobe vključila domačo prodajo izdelkov izven obsega preiskave, tj. zaprtih svitkov žičnatih vrvi.
However, as indicated in recital (18), locked coil ropes are expressively included in the definition of the product concerned not only for the present investigation, but they were also included in the original investigation.
Vendar so, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (18), svitki vrvi izrecno vključeni v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka ne le za sedanjo preiskavo, ampak tudi za prvotno preiskavo.
The Indian exporting producer claimed that the normal value used to calculate its dumping margin during the IP would not reasonably reflect domestic prices and costs, since it was determined on an unrepresentative basis, i.e. on the basis of 4 months of the IP instead of 12.
Indijski proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da normalna vrednost, uporabljena za izračun njegove stopnje dampinga med OP, ne odraža nujno domačih cen in stroškov, ker je bila določena na nereprezentativni podlagi, tj. na podlagi štirih mescev OP in ne dvanajstih.
It should be noted that in the framework of an expiry review and in accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it is examined whether the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.
Treba je opomniti, da se v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka roka in v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe preučuje, ali obstaja verjetnost, da bi iztek ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode.
As a result, definitive anti-dumping duties are either confirmed or repealed, while individual duty rates as such cannot be amended.
Zato se dokončne protidampinške dajatve niti ne potrdijo niti ne razveljavijo, medtem ko se individualne stopnje dajatev kot take ne morejo spremeniti.
Since the calculation of precise dumping margins in the framework of an expiry review is therefore not necessary, the examination of the continuation of dumping is based on a representative set of data during the IP.
Ker izračun natančnih stopenj dampinga v okviru pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa ni potreben, temelji preučitev nadaljevanja dampinga na reprezentativnem sklopu podatkov med OP.
In the present proceeding, data were requested for the months at the end of each quarter and the exporting producers were invited to comment on their representativity.
V sedanjem postopku so bili zahtevani podatki za mesece ob koncu vsakega četrtletja in proizvajalci izvozniki so bili pozvani, da dajo pripombe glede njihove reprezentativnosti.