natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 4(a) of Directive 72/166/EEC permits a Member State to act in derogation from the general obligation to take out compulsory insurance in respect of vehicles belonging to certain natural or public or private legal persons.
Člen 4(a) Direktive 72/166/EGS državam članicam dovoljuje, da glede vozil nekaterih fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, bodisi javnih ali zasebnih, odstopajo od splošne obveznosti obveznega zavarovanja.
For accidents caused by such vehicles, the Member State so derogating must designate an authority or body to compensate for the damage to victims of accidents caused in another Member State.
V primeru nesreč, ki jih povzročijo takšna vozila, mora država članica, ki tako odstopa, določiti organ, ki oškodovancem v nesrečah, povzročenih v drugih državah članicah, plača odškodnino.
In order to ensure that due compensation is paid not only to the victims of accidents caused by these vehicles abroad but also the victims of accidents occurring in the same Member State in which the vehicle is normally based, whether or not they are resident in its territory, the aforementioned Article should be amended.
Da se zagotovi plačilo ustrezne odškodnine ne samo oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih povzročijo ta vozila v tujini, temveč tudi oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki se zgodijo v državi članici, na ozemlju katere vozilo običajno je, ne glede na to, ali stalno prebivajo na njenem ozemlju ali ne, je treba zgoraj omenjeni člen spremeniti.
Furthermore, Member States should ensure that the list of persons exempt from compulsory insurance and the authorities or bodies responsible for compensation of victims of accidents caused by such vehicles is communicated to the Commission for publication.
Hkrati morajo države članice zagotoviti, da se Komisiji za objavo sporoči seznam oseb, izvzetih iz obveznega zavarovanja, in organov, ki so odgovorni za odškodnino oškodovancem v nesrečah.
Article 4(b) of Directive 72/166/EEC permits a Member State to act in derogation from the general obligation to take out compulsory insurance in respect of certain types of vehicles or certain vehicles having a special plate.
Člen 4(b) Direktive 72/166/EGS državam članicam dovoljuje, da glede nekaterih vrst vozil ali nekaterih vozil, ki imajo posebne tablice, odstopajo od splošne obveznosti obveznega zavarovanja.
In that case, the other Member States are allowed to require, at the entry into their territory, a valid green card or a frontier insurance contract, in order to ensure the provision of compensation to victims of any accident which may be caused by those vehicles in their territories.
V tem primeru lahko druge države članice pri vstopu na svoje ozemlje zahtevajo veljavno zeleno karto ali sklenitev obmejne pogodbe o zavarovanju, da zagotovijo odškodnino oškodovancem morebitnih nesreč, ki bi jih takšna vozila lahko povzročila na njihovem ozemlju.
However, since the elimination of border controls within the Community means that it is not possible to ensure that vehicles crossing frontiers are covered by insurance, compensation for victims of accidents caused abroad can no longer be guaranteed.
Vendar pa zaradi odprave mejnih kontrol znotraj Skupnosti ni več mogoče zagotavljati, da so vozila, ki prečkajo mejo, zavarovana, in tako ni več mogoče zagotavljati odškodnine oškodovancem v nesrečah, povzročenih v tujini.
Furthermore, it should also be ensured that due compensation is awarded not only to the victims of accidents caused by those vehicles abroad, but also in the same Member State in which the vehicle is normally based.
Hkrati je treba zagotoviti ustrezno odškodnino ne samo oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih ta vozila povzročijo v tujini, temveč tudi oškodovancem v isti državi članici, v kateri vozilo običajno je.
For this purpose, Member States should treat the victims of accidents caused by those vehicles in the same way as victims of accidents caused by non-insured vehicles.
V ta namen morajo države članice oškodovance nesreč, ki jih povzročijo taka vozila, obravnavati enako kot oškodovance nesreč, ki jih povzročijo nezavarovana vozila.
Indeed, as provided for in Directive 84/5/EEC, compensation to victims of accidents caused by uninsured vehicles should be paid by the compensation body of the Member State in which the accident took place.
V skladu z Direktivo 84/5/EGS mora odškodnino oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki jih povzročijo nezavarovana vozila, plačati organ za zagotavljanje odškodnine države članice, v kateri se je nesreča zgodila.
Where payments are made to victims of accidents caused by vehicles subject to the derogation, the compensation body should have a claim against the body of the Member State in which the vehicle is normally based.
V primeru plačila oškodovancem v nesrečah, ki so jih povzročila vozila, za katera se uporablja to odstopanje, mora imeti organ za zagotavljanje odškodnine zahtevek nasproti organu države članice, kjer vozilo običajno je.
After a period of five years from the date of entry into force of this Directive, the Commission should, if appropriate, in view of the experience with the implementation and application of this derogation, submit proposals for its replacement or repeal.
Po izteku obdobja petih let od začetka veljavnosti te direktive mora Komisija, če je to primerno, v luči izkušenj pri izvajanju in uporabi tega odstopanja, predložiti predloge za njegovo nadomestitev ali razveljavitev.
The corresponding provision in Directive 2000/26/EC should also be deleted.
Prav tako je treba črtati ustrezne določbe Direktive 2000/26/ES.
In order to clarify the scope of application of the motor insurance directives in accordance with Article 299 of the Treaty, the reference to the non-European territory of the Member States in Articles 6 and 7(1) of Directive 72/166/EEC should be deleted.
Da bi se natančneje določilo področje uporabe direktiv o avtomobilskem zavarovanju v skladu s členom 299 Pogodbe, je v členih 6 in 7(1) Direktive 72/166/EGS treba črtati sklicevanje na ozemlje držav članic zunaj Evrope.
Member States' obligations to guarantee insurance cover at least in respect of certain minimum amounts constitute an important element in ensuring the protection of victims.
Obveznosti držav članic, da zagotovijo zavarovalno kritje vsaj z določenimi minimalnimi vsotami, predstavlja pomemben element pri zagotavljanju varstva oškodovancev.
The minimum amounts provided for in Directive 84/5/EEC should not only be updated to take account of inflation, but also increased in real terms, to improve the protection of victims.
Minimalne vsote iz Direktive 84/5/EGS je treba posodobiti ne samo tako, da upoštevajo inflacijo, temveč tudi zvišati njihovo realno vrednost, da se izboljša varstvo oškodovancev.
The minimum amount of cover for personal injury should be calculated so as to compensate fully and fairly all victims who have suffered very serious injuries, whilst taking into account the low frequency of accidents involving several victims and the small number of accidents in which several victims suffer very serious injuries in the course of one and the same event.
Najnižji znesek zavarovalnega kritja za telesno poškodbo se izračuna tako, da se v celoti in pravično povrne škoda vsem oškodovancem, ki so utrpeli zelo hude poškodbe, pri čemer se upošteva nizka pogostost nesreč z več oškodovanci in majhno število nesreč, v katerih več oškodovancev utrpi zelo hude poškodbe v eni in isti nesreči.
A minimum amount of cover of EUR 1000000 per victim or EUR 5000000 per claim, regardless of the number of victims, is a reasonable and adequate amount.
Minimalna vsota kritja v višini 1000000 EUR na oškodovanca in 5000000 EUR na škodni dogodek, ne glede na število oškodovancev, je razumna in ustrezna.
With a view to facilitating the introduction of these minimum amounts, a transitional period of five years from the date of implementation of this Directive should be established.
Zaradi olajšanja uvedbe teh minimalnih vsot je treba predvideti prehodno obdobje petih let od datuma začetka izvajanja te direktive.
Member States should increase their amounts to at least a half of those levels within 30 months of the date of implementation.
Države članice morajo v tridesetih mesecih od datuma začetka izvajanja te direktive povečati svoje vsote na vsaj polovico teh minimalnih ravni.
In order to ensure that the minimum amount of cover is not eroded over time, a periodic review clause should be introduced using as a benchmark the European Index of Consumer Prices (EICP) published by Eurostat, as provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 of 23 October 1995 concerning harmonised indices of consumer prices [8].
Da se prepreči razvrednotenje minimalne vsote kritja s potekom časa, je treba uvesti klavzulo o rednem pregledu, ki za referenco uporablja evropski indeks cen življenjskih potrebščin (EICP), ki ga objavlja Eurostat in je predviden z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2494/95 z dne 23. oktobra 1995 o harmoniziranih indeksih cen življenjskih potrebščin [8].
The procedural rules governing such a review need to be established.
Treba je oblikovati postopkovna pravila za takšen pregled.
Directive 84/5/EEC, which allows Member States, in the interest of preventing fraud, to limit or exclude payments by the compensation body in the case of damage to property by an unidentified vehicle, may impede legitimate compensation of victims in some cases.
Direktiva 84/5/EGS, ki v interesu preprečevanja goljufij državam članicam dovoljuje, da omejijo ali izključijo plačila organa za zagotavljanje odškodnine v primeru materialne škode, ki jo povzroči neznano vozilo, lahko v nekaterih primerih onemogoči pravično povračilo škode oškodovancem.
The option of limiting or excluding compensation on the basis that the vehicle is not identified should not apply where the body has paid compensation for significant personal injuries to any victim of the same accident in which the damage to property was caused.
Možnost omejitve ali izključitve odškodnine iz razloga, da je vozilo neznano, se ne sme uporabljati, če je organ plačal odškodnino za hujše telesne poškodbe kateremu koli oškodovancu iste nesreče, v kateri je bila povzročena materialna škoda.
Member States may provide for an excess up to the limit set out in the said Directive for which the victim of the damage to property may be responsible.
Države članice lahko predvidijo franšizo do meje, ki jo določa omenjena direktiva, ki jo nosi oškodovanec, ki mu je bila povzročena materialna škoda.
The conditions in which personal injuries are to be considered significant should be determined by the national legislation or administrative provisions of the Member State where the accident takes place.
Pogoje, pod katerimi se telesne poškodbe štejejo za hujše, mora določiti nacionalna zakonodaja ali upravni predpisi države članice, kjer se je nesreča zgodila.
In establishing these conditions, the Member State may take into account, inter alia, whether the injury has required hospital care.
Pri določanju teh pogojev lahko države članice med drugim upoštevajo, ali je poškodba zahtevala bolnišnično oskrbo.
At present, an option contained in Directive 84/5/EEC allows Member States to authorise, up to a specified ceiling, excesses for which the victim would be responsible in the event of damage to property caused by uninsured vehicles.
Trenutno Direktiva 84/5/EGS predvideva možnost, ki državam članicam dopušča, da dovolijo franšize do določenega praga, ki jih v primeru materialne škode, ki jo povzročijo nezavarovana vozila, nosi oškodovanec.
That option unjustly reduces the protection of victims and creates discrimination with respect to victims of other accidents.
Ta možnost neupravičeno zmanjšuje varstvo oškodovancev in povzroča diskriminacijo v primerjavi z oškodovanci v drugih nesrečah.
It should therefore no longer be permitted.
Te možnosti zato ni mogoče več dopustiti.
Second Council Directive 88/357/EEC of 22 June 1988 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance and laying down provisions to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom to provide services [9] should be amended in order to permit branches of insurance undertakings to become representatives with respect to motor insurance activities, as already happens with respect to insurance services other than motor insurance.
Drugo direktivo Sveta 88/357/EGS z dne 22. junija 1988 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o neposrednem zavarovanju razen življenjskega zavarovanja, ki opredeljuje določbe za učinkovito uresničevanje svobode opravljanja storitev [9], je treba spremeniti tako, da podružnicam zavarovalnic dovoljuje, da postanejo pooblaščenke pri dejavnostih avtomobilskega zavarovanja, kar že velja pri drugih zavarovalnih storitvah, ki niso avtomobilsko zavarovanje.
The inclusion within the insurance cover of any passenger in the vehicle is a major achievement of the existing legislation.
Vključitev vseh potnikov v vozilu v zavarovalno kritje je pomemben dosežek veljavne zakonodaje.
This objective would be placed in jeopardy if national legislation or any contractual clause contained in an insurance contract excluded passengers from insurance cover because they knew or should have known that the driver of the vehicle was under the influence of alcohol or of any other intoxicating agent at the time of the accident.
Ta cilj bi bil ogrožen, če bi nacionalna zakonodaja ali kakšna pogodbena klavzula v pogodbi o zavarovanju izključevala potnike iz zavarovalnega kritja, ker so vedeli ali bi morali vedeti, da je bil voznik vozila v času nesreče pod vplivom alkohola ali drugih opojnih snovi.
The passenger is not usually in a position to assess properly the intoxication level of the driver.
Potnik navadno ne more pravilno oceniti stopnje voznikove opojenosti.
The objective of discouraging persons from driving whilst under the influence of intoxicating agents is not achieved by reducing the insurance cover for passengers who are victims of motor vehicle accidents.
Cilja odvračati ljudi od vožnje pod vplivom opojnih snovi se ne da doseči z zmanjševanjem zavarovalnega kritja za potnike, ki so oškodovanci v prometnih nesrečah.
Cover of such passengers under the vehicle's compulsory motor insurance does not prejudge any liability they might incur pursuant to the applicable national legislation, nor the level of any award of damages in a specific accident.
Kritje teh potnikov v okviru obveznega avtomobilskega zavarovanja ne vpliva na morebitno odgovornost, ki jo lahko nosijo v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo, niti na višine odmerjenih odškodnin v zvezi s posamezno nesrečo.
Personal injuries and damage to property suffered by pedestrians, cyclists and other non-motorised users of the road, who are usually the weakest party in an accident, should be covered by the compulsory insurance of the vehicle involved in the accident where they are entitled to compensation under national civil law.
Telesne poškodbe in materialno škodo, ki jo utrpijo pešci, kolesarji in drugi nemotorizirani udeleženci v prometu, ki so navadno šibkejši udeleženci v nesrečah, mora kriti obvezno zavarovanje vozila, udeleženega v nesreči, če so te osebe po nacionalnem civilnem pravu upravičene do odškodnine.
This provision does not prejudge the civil liability or the level of awards for damages in a specific accident, under national legislation.
Ta določba ne sme vplivati na civilnopravno odgovornost ali na višine odškodnin v zvezi s posamezno nesrečo po nacionalni zakonodaji.
Some insurance undertakings insert into insurance policies clauses to the effect that the contract will be cancelled if the vehicle remains outside the Member State of registration for longer than a specified period.
Nekatere zavarovalnice v zavarovalne police vključujejo klavzule, ki določajo, da bo pogodba razveljavljena, če bi vozilo dlje kot določeno obdobje ostalo zunaj države članice registracije.
This practice is in conflict with the principle set out in Directive 90/232/EEC, according to which the compulsory motor insurance should cover, on the basis of a single premium, the entire territory of the Community.
Takšna praksa je v nasprotju z načelom Direktive 90/232/EGS, v skladu s katerim mora obvezno avtomobilsko zavarovanje na podlagi ene same premije zagotavljati kritje na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti.
It should therefore be specified that the insurance cover is to remain valid during the whole term of the contract, irrespective of whether the vehicle remains in another Member State for a particular period, without prejudice to the obligations under Member States' national legislation with respect to the registration of vehicles.
Zato je treba določiti, da brez poseganja v obveznosti glede registracije vozil po nacionalni zakonodaji držav članic, zavarovalno kritje ostane veljavno celotno obdobje veljavnosti pogodbe, ne glede na to, ali vozilo ostane določeno obdobje v drugi državi članici.
Steps should be taken to make it easier to obtain insurance cover for vehicles imported from one Member State into another, even though the vehicle is not yet registered in the Member State of destination.
Treba je sprejeti ukrepe, ki bodo olajšali pridobitev zavarovalnega kritja za vozila, uvožena iz ene države članice v drugo, četudi vozilo še ni registrirano v namembni državi članici.
A temporary derogation from the general rule determining the Member State where the risk is situated should be made available.
Zagotoviti je treba začasno odstopanje od splošnega pravila za določanje države članice, v kateri je nevarnost.
For a period of 30 days from the date when the vehicle is delivered, made available or dispatched to the purchaser, the Member State of destination should be considered to be the Member State where the risk is situated.
V obdobju tridesetih dni od datuma, ko je vozilo dostavljeno, dano na razpolago ali odposlano kupcu, se mora namembna država članica šteti za državo članico, v kateri je nevarnost.
Any person wishing to take out a new motor insurance contract with another insurer should be in a position to justify his accident and claims record under the old contract.
Katera koli oseba, ki želi skleniti novo avtomobilsko zavarovanje z drugo zavarovalnico, mora imeti možnost dokazati svojo zgodovino nesreč in zahtevkov po stari pogodbi.
The policyholder should have the right to request at any time a statement concerning the claims, or the absence of claims, involving the vehicle or vehicles covered by the insurance contract at least during the preceding five years of the contractual relationship.
Imetnik police mora imeti pravico kadar koli zahtevati izjavo o zahtevkih oz. o njihovem neobstoju za vozilo oz. vozila, ki jih krije zavarovalna pogodba, najmanj za obdobje zadnjih petih let pogodbenega razmerja.
The insurance undertaking, or any body which may have been appointed by a Member State to provide compulsory insurance or to supply such statements, should provide this statement to the policyholder within 15 days of the request.
Zavarovalnica ali kateri koli organ, ki ga država članica imenuje za zagotavljanje obveznega zavarovanja ali izdajo takih izjav, mora takšno izjavo imetniku police zagotoviti v petnajstih dneh od prošnje.
In order to ensure due protection of victims of motor vehicle accidents, Member States should not permit insurance undertakings to rely on excesses against an injured party.
Da se zagotovi ustrezna zaščita oškodovancev prometnih nesreč, države članice zavarovalnicam ne smejo dopuščati, da se nasproti oškodovancem sklicujejo na franšize.
The right to invoke the insurance contract and to claim against the insurance undertaking directly is of great importance for the protection of victims of motor vehicle accidents.
Pravica neposrednega sklicevanja na zavarovalno pogodbo in neposrednih odškodninskih zahtevkov nasproti zavarovalnicam je zelo pomembna za varstvo oškodovancev v prometnih nesrečah.
Directive 2000/26/EC already provides victims of accidents occurring in a Member State other than the Member State of residence of the injured party, which are caused by the use of vehicles insured and normally based in a Member State, with a right of direct action against the insurance undertaking covering the person responsible against civil liability.
Direktiva 2000/26/ES oškodovancem nesreč, ki so se zgodile v državi članici, ki ni država članica stalnega prebivališča oškodovanca, in jo je povzročila uporaba vozil, ki so zavarovana v državi članici in so običajno v državi članici, predvideva pravico do neposrednega zahtevka proti zavarovalnici, ki krije civilno odgovornost povzročitelja nesreče.
In order to facilitate an efficient and speedy settlement of claims and to avoid as far as possible costly legal proceedings, this right should be extended to victims of any motor vehicle accident.
Za učinkovitejšo in hitrejšo obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov in da se v največji možni meri izogne dragim pravnim postopkom, je to pravico treba razširiti na vse oškodovance prometnih nesreč.
To enhance the protection of victims of motor vehicle accidents, the ‘reasoned offer’ procedure provided for in Directive 2000/26/EC should be extended to any kind of motor vehicle accident.
Za izboljšanje varstva vseh oškodovancev prometnih nesreč je postopek „utemeljene ponudbe“ iz Direktive 2000/26/ES treba razširiti na vse vrste prometnih nesreč.
This same procedure should also apply mutatis mutandis where the accident is settled by the system of national insurers' bureaux provided for in Directive 72/166/EEC.
Enak postopek je treba smiselno uporabljati v primerih, ko se nesreča obravnava v okviru sistema nacionalnih zavarovalnih birojev iz Direktive 72/166/EGS.
In order to make it easier for the injured party to seek compensation, the information centres set up in accordance with Directive 2000/26/EC should not be confined to providing information concerning the accidents covered by that Directive, but should be able to provide the same kind of information for any motor vehicle accident.
Da oškodovanci lažje zahtevajo odškodnino, informacijski centri, vzpostavljeni v skladu z Direktivo 2000/26/ES, ne smejo zagotavljati zgolj podatkov o nesrečah, ki jih zajema ta direktiva, temveč morajo zagotavljati enake podatke o vseh prometnih nesrečah.
Under Article 11(2) read in conjunction with Article 9(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [10], injured parties may bring legal proceedings against the civil liability insurance provider in the Member State in which they are domiciled.
V skladu s členom 11(2) v povezavi s členom 9(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [10] lahko oškodovanci sprožijo pravne postopke za civilno odgovornost proti zavarovalnici v državi članici, v kateri imajo stalno prebivališče.
As Directive 2000/26/EC was adopted before the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, which replaced the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on the same matter for a number of Member States, the reference to that Convention in that Directive should be adapted as appropriate.
Ker je bila Direktiva 2000/26/ES sprejeta pred sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001, ki je za številne države članice nadomestila Bruseljsko konvencijo z dne 27. septembra 1968, ki je urejala isto področje, je treba sklicevanje na to konvencijo v omenjeni direktivi ustrezno prilagoditi.
Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council should therefore be amended accordingly,
Direktive Sveta 72/166/EGS, 84/5/EGS, 88/357/EGS in 90/232/EGS ter Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/26/ES je treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Amendments to Directive 72/166/EEC
Spremembe Direktive 72/166/EGS
Directive 72/166/EEC shall be amended as follows:
Direktiva 72/166/EGS se spremeni:
Article 1(4) is amended as follows:
Točka 4 člena 1 se spremeni:
the first indent shall be replaced by the following:
prva alinea se nadomesti z naslednjim: