natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recurrent fixed costs: general RDF costs: verification whether failed coverage (gemiste dekkingen) is appropriate and has not been met by other means; verification of actual accounting, legal and banking cost; verification of actual costs for other elements
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: splošni stroški peči RDF: preveritev, ali je neustrezno kritje (gemiste dekkingen) primerno in ni bilo doseženo z drugimi sredstvi; preveritev dejanskih računovodskih, pravnih in bančnih stroškov; preveritev dejanskih stroškov za druge elemente
Recurrent fixed costs: security, canteen, purchasing, administrative facilities at Professor Gerbrandyweg: actual costs of transporting electricity based on the actual date on which the facility with Eneco was ended or bought back; costs forgone of rent for offices, etc., taking account of any proceeds from actual re-use; verification whether failed coverage for purchasing function for restaurant, warehouse and security is appropriate and has not been met by other means
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: varovanje, menza, nabava, administrativni prostori na naslovu Professor Gerbrandyweg: dejanski stroški transporta električne energije na podlagi dejanskega datuma, ko je bila zmogljivost pri podjetju Eneco zaključena ali odkupljena; opuščeni stroški najemnine za pisarne itd., ob upoštevanju morebitnih prihodkov od dejanske ponovne uporabe; preveritev, ali je neustrezno kritje za nabave za restavracijo, skladišče in varovanje primerno in ni bilo doseženo z drugimi sredstvi
Recurrent fixed costs: ICT infrastructure: verification whether missed coverage for ICT infrastructure has not been met by other means
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: infrastruktura ICT: preveritev, ali neustrezno kritje za infrastrukturo ICT ni bilo doseženo z drugimi sredstvi
Recurrent fixed costs: personnel costs: actual costs of central telephone function and leased lines
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: stroški dela: dejanski stroški telefonske centrale in zakupljenih vodov
Recurrent fixed cost: rent/lease of equipment: actual missed coverage of specialised trucks and forklift trucks and actual proceeds from sales or alternative use within AVR
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: najem/zakup opreme: dejansko neustrezno kritje specializiranih tovornjakov in viličarjev ter dejanski prihodki od prodaje ali alternativne uporabe znotraj podjetja AVR
Recurrent fixed cost: other overheads: actual costs and actual reduction in costs of maintenance and cleaning contracts
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški: drugi režijski stroški: dejanski stroški in dejansko znižanje stroškov vzdrževanja in pogodbe o čiščenju
Recurrent fixed costs
Ponavljajoči se stalni stroški
Verification of actual removal and decontamination costs for the installations directly used for the SGEI
Preveritev dejanskih stroškov odstranitve in dekontaminacije za naprave, ki se uporabljajo neposredno za storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
The verification includes a calculation showing that the aid does not lead to a higher rate of return than the return on Dutch government bonds plus 2 percentage points.
Preveritev vključuje izračun, ki kaže, da pomoč ne povzroča stopnje donosa, ki je višja od stopnje donosa nizozemskih državnih obveznic, povečane za 2 odstotni točki.
Information regarding the implementation of the Commission decision in Case C 43 2003 - Netherlands, operating aid in favour of AVR for dealing with hazardous waste
Podatki o izvajanju odločbe Komisije v zadevi C 43 2003 – Nizozemska, pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, namenjena podjetju AVR za ravnanje z nevarnimi odpadki
Calculation of the amount to be recovered
Izračun zneska, ki ga je treba povrniti
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful state aid that has been put at the disposal of the recipient:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje podrobne podatke o znesku nezakonite državne pomoči, ki je bila dana na razpolago prejemniku:
Date(s) of payment [1]
Datum(i) plačil [1]
Identity of recipient
Ime prejemnika
Please explain in detail how the interest payable on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated.
Prosimo, da podrobno razložite, kako se bodo izračunale obresti na znesek pomoči, ki ga je treba povrniti.
Recovery measures planned and already taken
Načrtovani in že sprejeti ukrepi za povračilo
Please describe in detail what measures have been taken and what measures are planned to bring about an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, da podrobno razložite, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti in katere ukrepe načrtujete za takojšnje in učinkovito povračilo pomoči.
Please explain what alternative measures are available under national law to effect recovery.
Navedite, kateri alternativni ukrepi so na voljo v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje za izvršitev povračila.
Where relevant, please indicate the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Kjer je to primerno, navedite pravno podlago za sprejete/načrtovane ukrepe.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Do katerega datuma bo povračilo pomoči izvedeno?
Recovery already effected
Povračilo, ki je že izvedeno
Please provide the following details of aid that has been recovered from the recipient:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje podrobne podatke o pomoči, ki so jo prejemniki povrnili:
Date(s) [3]
Datum(i) [3]
Identify of recipient
Ime prejemnika
Please attach supporting documents for the repayments shown in the table at point 3.1.
Prosimo, priložite dokazila o povračilih, navedenih v tabeli pod točko 3.1.
(°) Date(s) on which the aid or individual instalments of aid were put at the disposal of the recipient; if the measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements, use separate rows.
(°) Datum(i), ko je prejemnik dobil na razpolago pomoč ali posamezne obroke pomoči; če ukrep sestavlja več obrokov in nadomestil, uporabite ločene vrstice.
For the period 2002-03, in addition to the predetermined deficit, AVR Nuts incurred losses of €12 million.
V obdobju 2002–2003 je poleg vnaprej določenega primanjkljaja podjetje AVR Nuts utrpelo 12 milijonov EUR izgub.
Secondly, the actual compensation to be granted by the Netherlands for the closure of the RDFs was significantly lower than AVR’s own cost calculation of €45 million and the calculation of almost €40 million made by an independent accountant of these same costs.
Drugič, dejansko nadomestilo, ki naj bi ga Nizozemska dodelila za zaprtje peči RDF, je bilo precej nižje od lastnega izračuna stroškov podjetja AVR v višini 45 milijonov EUR in izračuna istih stroškov v višini skoraj 40 milijonov EUR, ki ga je opravil neodvisen računovodja.
The main difference stemmed from the different cost calculations for redundancies.
Glavna razlika je izhajala iz različnih izračunov stroškov odpuščanja delavcev.
For 2002 and 2003, moreover, accidents and technical difficulties caused losses that exceeded the predetermined deficits by a total of €12 million. Any overcompensation in favour of AVR Nuts during that period is, therefore, ruled out.
V letih 2002 in 2003 so nesreče in tehnične težave povzročile celo izgube, ki so presegle vnaprej določene primanjkljaje za skupaj 12 milijonov EUR. Možnost prekomernega nadomestila v prid podjetja AVR Nuts v tem obdobju je zato izključena.
In addition, the supply of RDF waste for export varies from year to year and depends on the situation on the international market.
Poleg tega se dobava odpadkov RDF iz leta v leto spreminja in je odvisna od razmer na mednarodnem trgu.
The situation varies as well for different categories of waste.
Razmere se razlikujejo tudi glede različnih kategorij odpadkov.
It confers on AVR IW a discriminatory advantage for a specific activity that is in direct competition with other waste management companies.
Podjetju AVR IW namreč daje diskriminacijsko prednost za določeno dejavnost, ki neposredno konkurira drugim podjetjem za ravnanje z odpadki.
Such acquisition is not directly in the public interest that justifies the aid, and this is certainly the case with RDF waste acquired abroad.
Tako pridobivanje ni neposredno v interesu javnosti, ki bi upravičil pomoč, zagotovo pa je prisotno tudi vprašanje odpadkov RDF, pridobljenih v tujini.
By letter of 7 January 2003 (registered as received on 10 January under No A/30189), the Netherlands notified operating aid for AVR Nutsbedrijf Gevaarlijk Afval B.V.
Z dopisom z dne 7. januarja 2003 (evidentiranim 10. januarja pod številko A/30189) je Nizozemska prijavila pomoč za tekoče poslovanje za podjetje AVR Nutsbedrijf Gevaarlijk Afval B.V.
(hereinafter ‘AVR Nuts’) for treating hazardous waste in the Netherlands with a view to disposal.
(v nadaljevanju „AVR Nuts“) za ravnanje z nevarnimi odpadki na Nizozemskem z namenom odstranjevanja.
The C2 depot and the various RDFs were originally set up by AVR Chemie C.V.
Deponijo C2 in različne peči RDF je prvotno ustanovilo podjetje AVR Chemie C.V.
(‘AVR Chemie’), which is owned 30 % by the State and 70 % by Holding AVR Bedrijven N.V. (‘AVR-Holding’ or ‘AVR’ in short).
(„AVR Chemie“), ki je v 30-odstotni državni lasti, 70 % podjetja pa je v lasti podjetja Holding AVR Bedrijven N.V. („AVR-Holding“ ali skrajšano „AVR“).
AVR-Industrial Waste Services Rotterdam B.V.
Ustanovljeno je bilo podjetje AVR-Industrial Waste Services Rotterdam B.V.
(‘AVR IW’) was set up to take over the remaining activities on the (hazardous) waste markets, on which AVR wanted to remain active for its own commercial reasons.
(„AVR IW“), ki naj bi prevzelo ostale dejavnosti na trgih (nevarnih) odpadkov, kjer je podjetje AVR želelo ostati aktivno iz lastnih komercialnih razlogov.
Member States are free to define what they regard as services of general economic interest on the basis of the specific features of the activities.
Države članice lahko na podlagi posebnih značilnosti dejavnosti prosto določijo, kaj po njihovem velja za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
This definition can only be subject to control for manifest error [17].
Ta določitev se lahko preveri le, kar zadeva očitne napake.
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the recipient (in gross grant equivalent)
Znesek pomoči, ki jo je prejemnik dobil na razpolago (v bruto protivrednosti donacije)
(°) Date(s) on which the aid was repaid.
(°) Datum(i) povračila pomoči.
By virtue of the decision, the State ‘grants AVR Nuts the exclusive right for a period of 5 years to operate the C2 depot and deal with hazardous waste in the RDFs subject to the obligation to offer the services of these installations as services of general economic interest to the public on reasonable, transparent and non-discriminatory conditions and against socially acceptable tariffs, in compliance with the conditions and provisions laid down in greater detail in the concession agreement.’ The agreement determines in detail the conditions for AVR Nuts’ operations.
Država z odločbo „dodeli AVR Nuts izključno pravico za obdobje 5 let, da upravlja z deponijo C2 in ravna z nevarnimi odpadki v pečeh RDF pod pogojem, da javnosti ponuja storitve teh naprav kot storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena pod primernimi, preglednimi in nediskriminacijskimi pogoji ter po družbeno sprejemljivih tarifah v skladu s pogoji in določbami, ki so podrobneje določene v koncesijski pogodbi.“ Pogodba podrobno določa pogoje za delovanje podjetja AVR Nuts.
The predetermined deficits for 2004 and thereafter were expected to be much higher than foreseen and, indeed, the predetermined deficit for 2004 amounted to €8,898 million [12]. The calculation took account of the decision to close the RDFs.
Pričakovalo se je, da bodo vnaprej določeni primanjkljaji za leto 2004 in naslednja leta mnogo višji, kot je bilo predvideno, in res je vnaprej določen primanjkljaj za leto 2004 znašal 8,898 milijona EUR. [12] V izračunu je bila upoštevana odločitev o zaprtju peči RDF.
on the measure implemented by France for Mines de potasse d’Alsace
glede ukrepa Francije za Mines de Potasse d’Alsace
(notified under document number C(2005) 4204)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 4204)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
In 1994, the Commission approved a EUR 76 million capital injection by the French State for Entreprise minière et chimique (hereinafter EMC), to be transferred by EMC to the company Mines de potasses d’Alsace (MDPA) in the form of a capital increase.
Leta 1994 je Komisija odobrila kapitalski vložek 76 milijonov EUR francoske države v Entreprise Minière et Chimique (Podjetje za rudarstvo in kemikalije) (v nadaljevanju „EMC“), namenjen, da ga EMC prenese na družbo Mines de Potasses d’Alsace (v nadaljevanju „MDPA“) v obliki povečanja kapitala.
In its decision [2], the Commission considered the measure to be compatible with the common market since it was intended to offset the extra social costs of retired workers (heating, accommodation, bridging allowance and severance grant) borne by MDPA by virtue of the special legal status of miners [3].
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi [2] ocenila, da je ukrep v skladu s skupnim trgom, saj je bil namenjen nadomestitvi dodatnih prispevkov upokojencev za socialno varnost (ogrevanje, nastanitev, nadomestila za priključke in odpravnine), ki jih podpira MDPA zaradi posebnega zakonskega statuta rudarjev [3].
In 1996, the Commission approved [4] for the same reasons, three capital injections each of EUR 38 million by the French State for EMC for the years 1995, 1996 and 1997, to be transferred by EMC to MDPA in the form of capital increases.
Leta 1996 je Komisija zaradi istih razlogov odobrila [4] tri kapitalske vložke francoske države EMC po 38 milijonov EUR za leta 1995, 1996 in 1997, namenjene, da jih EMC prenese na MDPA v obliki povečanja kapitala.
On 7 December 1998, the French authorities notified three more capital injections each of EUR 42 million that would be granted in 1998, 1999 and 2000 to EMC and transferred to MDPA.
Dne 7. decembra 1998 so francoski organi priglasili tri nove kapitalske vložke po 42 milijonov EUR, ki jih je bilo leta 1998, 1999 in 2000 treba dodeliti EMC in jih prenesti na MDPA.
According to the French authorities, these measures were designed to compensate MDPA for certain social and environmental costs incurred as a result of its closure.
Po mnenju Francije je bil v tem primeru namen ukrepov nadomestiti MDPA nekatere socialne in okoljske stroške zaradi zaprtja MDPA.
The additional information communicated by France to the Commission on 22 January 1999 revealed that, in addition to the transfer of the aid granted by France, EMC had subscribed to capital increases for MDPA every year since 1995.
Dodatni podatki, ki jih je Francija sporočila Komisiji 22. januarja 1999, so pokazali, da je EMC poleg prenosa pomoči, ki jo je dodelila Francija, vpisala povečanje kapitala MDPA vsa leta od leta 1995 naprej.
By letter of 14 March 2000, the French authorities informed the Commission that part of the aid notified in 1998 had already been granted to the firm.
V dopisu z dne 14. marca 2000 so francoski organi obvestili Komisijo, da je bilo del pomoči, priglašenih leta 1998, podjetju že dodeljenih.
In its reply of 10 April 2000, the Commission stated that this aid was to be regarded as unlawful.
V svojem odgovoru z dne 10. aprila 2000 je Komisija izjavila, da je treba te pomoči šteti za nezakonite.
By letter of 10 October 2000, the Commission informed France that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the above measures.
Z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2000 je Komisija obvestila Francijo o svoji odločitvi, da bo sprožila postopek, predviden v členu 88(2) Pogodbe, glede prej navedenih ukrepov.
The decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [5].
Ta odločitev je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [5].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je povabila zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnih pomočeh.
The Commission received comments from the French authorities on 28 November 2000 and on 21 and 23 March 2001.
Komisija je prejela pripombe francoskih organov 28. novembra 2000 ter 21. in 23. marca 2001.
A meeting between the French authorities and Commission representatives took place on 2 December 2004.
Francoski organi in predstavniki Komisije so se sestali 2. decembra 2004.
France sent information to the Commission by letters dated 8 February 2005 and 23 September 2005.
Francija je poslala informacije Komisiji v dopisih z dne 8. februarja 2005 in 23. septembra 2005.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURES
OPIS UKREPOV
The recipient
Upravičenec
MDPA had been working a sylvinite deposit in Alsace since 1904 in order to obtain potassium chloride, which is used as a fertiliser or as a raw material for industry.
MDPA je od leta 1904 izkoriščal alzaško nahajališče silvinita za zagotovitev pridobivanja kalijevega klorida, ki se uporablja kot gnojilo ali kot industrijska surovina.
In 1967 France set up EMC [6] an industrial/commercial establishment in the public sector, and reorganised MDPA into a Société anonyme à directoire et conseil de surveillance [7], that was a wholly owned subsidiary of EMC.
Leta 1967 je Francija ustanovila EMC [6], javno ustanovo industrijske ali trgovinske narave in preoblikovala MDPA v delniško družbo z upravo in nadzornim svetom [7], ki je hčerinska družba v 100-odstotni lasti EMC.
With the deposit being almost worked out, MPDA negotiated in 1996 a social plan for gradually winding down its activity until its complete closure in 2004.
Zaradi svojega izčrpanega nahajališča je MPDA leta 1996 sprejela socialni načrt, ki organizira postopno zmanjšanje dejavnosti do končnega zaprtja leta 2004.
In addition to MPDA, EMC then held, directly or through its holding company EMC société anonyme (EMC SA), interests in a number of companies operating in the chemical, animal food, environmental and waste reprocessing sectors.
Poleg MPDA je EMC takrat neposredno ali prek svojega holdinga delniške družbe EMC (v nadaljevanju „EMC SA“) imela kapitalske deleže še v nekaj družbah na področju kemikalij, krme, okolja in predelave odpadkov.
In its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, the Commission took the view that MDPA was the only recipient of the measures under examination.
V odločitvi o začetku formalnega postopka preiskave je Komisija menila, da je bil MDPA edini upravičenec ukrepov, ki se preiskujejo.
This decision concurs with that view.
Ta odločitev potrjuje to mnenje.
There is no evidence to show that EMC subsidiaries benefited from the aid granted to MDPA.
Dejansko noben element ne kaže na to, da bi hčerinske družbe EMC imele koristi od pomoči, namenjene MDPA.
In particular, there is no doubt that all the funds concerned were transferred to MDPA by EMC in the form of capital increases.
Zlasti ni nobenega dvoma, da je EMC vsa sredstva prenesla na MDPA v obliki povečanja kapitala.
In 2002, a fire brought MDPA's mining activities prematurely to an end.
Požar leta 2002 je predčasno končal rudarske dejavnosti MDPA.
The company's objective was amended to reflect this development: whereas, when it was set up, MDPA's objective was ‘to work the potassium salt and ancillary salt mines granted to the former public establishment Mines domaniales de potasse d’Alsace’, Article 3, as amended, of its memorandum and articles now states that the company’s objective is ‘to perform the tasks associated with the closure of the potassium mines in the area to the north of Mulhouse as regards the old workings, installations, annexes and outbuildings’.
Poslovna dejavnost podjetja je bila spremenjena tako, da odseva to spremembo: ob ustanovitvi je MDPA imela za cilj „izkoriščati rudnike kalijeve soli in s tem povezane soli, dodeljene prejšnji javni ustanovi Mines domaniales de potasse d'Alzace“, spremenjeni člen 3 njihovega statuta pa odslej določa, da je namen podjetja „zagotoviti opravljanje nalog, povezanih s prenehanjem izkoriščanja rudnikov kalija v bazenu na severu mesta Mulhouse v zvezi s prejšnjimi obrati, njihovo opremo, prizidki in stranskimi poslopji“.
These tasks consist mainly in supporting redeployment of the workforce and in reconverting, making safe and transferring the sites.
Te naloge predvsem obsegajo podporo za prerazporeditev osebja ter saniranje lokacij, zagotavljanje njihove varnosti in njihovo opuščanje.
MDPA will be wound up on completion of those tasks, scheduled for the end of 2009.
Družba MDPA bo na koncu te faze, ki je predvidena za konec leta 2009, prenehala z delom.
On 1 January 2005, EMC transferred its capital holding in MDPA to the State, free of charge [8].
Dne 1. januarja 2005 je EMC brezplačno opravila prenos svoje udeležbe v kapitalu MDPA na državo [8].
The decision to initiate the procedure relates to two distinct measures:
Odločitev o začetku postopka se nanaša na dva različna ukrepa:
Measure 1 or notified measures
Ukrep 1 ali priglašeni ukrepi
France paid to MDPA the aid notified in 1998 (i.e. EUR 42 million in 1998, in 1999 and in 2000) without awaiting the Commission's decision.
Francija je MDPA izplačala pomoči, priglašene leta 1998 (42 milijonov EUR leta 1998, 1999 in 2000), ne da bi čakala na odločitev Komisije.
This aid is therefore unlawful.
Te pomoči so torej nezakonite.
Measure 2 or additional aid
Ukrep 2 ali dodatne pomoči
In order for MDPA to continue its activities until 2004, the date scheduled for closure of the mines, EMC subscribed each year after 1996 to a capital injection for its subsidiary equivalent to the losses incurred by the latter the previous year.
Za zagotovitev nadaljevanja dejavnosti MDPA do leta 2004, načrtovanega datuma za prenehanje izkoriščanja rudnikov, je EMC vsako leto od leta 1996 povečevala kapital svoje hčerinske družbe, povečanje pa je bilo enako izgubi, ki jo je ta ugotovila v prejšnjem letu.
Table 1 shows that the amounts thus paid to MDPA are higher than the aid authorised by the Commission in its 1996 decision and the aid notified for the period 1998 to 2000.
Preglednica 1 kaže, da so zneski, ki so bili tako izplačani MDPA, višji od pomoči, ki jih je Komisija dovolila v svoji odločitvi iz leta 1996, in od pomoči, priglašenih za obdobje 1998–2000.
Table 1: Details of the non-notified aid granted to MDPA between 1995 and 2000
Preglednica 1: podrobni podatki nepriglašenih pomoči, dodeljenih MDPA med 1996 in 2000
Aid approved by the Commission in its 1996 decision
Pomoči, ki jih je Komisija dovolila v svoji odločitvi iz leta 1996
Aid notified 1998 to 2000 = Measure 1
Priglašene pomoči 1998–2000 = Ukrep 1
Result for MDPA
Poslovni rezultat MDPA
Capital increase granted to MDPA by EMC
Povečanje kapitala, ki ga je EMC dodelila MDPA
Measure 2
Ukrep 2
The Commission notes that the recipient is now wholly owned by France, that it has definitively ceased all economic activities in the potassium sector and that the mines will not be reopened.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je upravičenec odslej neposredno v 100-odstotni lasti Francije, da je dokončno prenehal opravljati vse gospodarske dejavnosti v sektorju kalija in da rudniki ne bodo ponovno odprti.
The sole rationale for MDPA's continued existence is to carry out the tasks associated with the shutdown of mining activity and, in particular, to adapt the site to safety and environmental protection requirements.
Edini razlog za obstoj MDPA je uspešna izvedba nalog, povezanih s prenehanjem izkoriščanja rudnikov, in zlasti zagotoviti, da so lokacije v skladu z varnostnimi zahtevami ter zahtevami o varstvu okolja.
This latter responsibility would, in any event, be incumbent on the State if MDPA had folded [9].
Ta zadnja odgovornost se v primeru, da MDPA preneha obstajati, v vsakem primeru prenese na državo [9].
Once these tasks have been carried out, MDPA will be wound up.
Ko bo ta naloga opravljena bo družba MDPA prenehala z delom.