natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its opinion on the use of vaccines for the control of salmonella in poultry, EFSA concludes that vaccination of poultry is regarded as an additional measure to increase the resistance of birds against salmonella exposure and decrease the shedding.
V svojem mnenju o uporabi cepiv za nadzor salmonele pri perutnini EFSA navaja, da se cepljenje perutnine šteje za dodatni ukrep za povečanje odpornosti pričev proti izpostavljenosti salmoneli in zmanjšanje širjenja.
In its conclusions, EFSA also states in particular that provided that the detection methods are able to differentiate the vaccine strains from wild strains, both inactivated and live vaccines can be safely used throughout the life of the birds except during the withdrawal period before slaughter.
EFSA v svojih sklepih zlasti tudi navaja, da če je z metodami odkrivanja mogoče razlikovati med sevi cepiva in divjimi sevi, se lahko varno uporabljajo inaktivirana cepiva in živa cepiva skozi vse življenje ptic, razen med karenco pred zakolom.
Therefore, on the basis of the opinion of EFSA, it is appropriate to provide that live vaccines should not be used as part of national control programmes to be adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003, if the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of salmonella from vaccine strains.
Zato je na podlagi mnenja EFSA primerno zagotoviti, da se živa cepiva ne smejo uporabljati kot del nacionalnih programov nadzora, ki jih je treba sprejeti v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2160/2003, če proizvajalec ne zagotovi ustrezne bakteriološke metode za razlikovanje med divjimi sevi salmonele in sevi cepiva.
Use of antimicrobials
Uporaba protimikrobnih sredstev
Antimicrobials shall not be used as a specific method to control salmonella in breeding flocks of Gallus gallus in the framework of national control programmes adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003, except in the circumstances established in paragraph 2.
Protimikrobna sredstva se ne uporabljajo kot posebna metoda za nadzor salmonele pri matičnih jatah Gallus gallus v okviru nacionalnih programov nadzora, sprejetih v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2160/2003, razen v okoliščinah, navedenih v odstavku 2.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, and subject to the conditions specified in points (a), (b) and (c) and in paragraph 3, antimicrobials authorised in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC or Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 may be used in the following exceptional circumstances:
Z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 in pod pogoji, opredeljenimi v točkah (a), (b) in (c) in v odstavku 3, se lahko protimikrobna sredstva, dovoljena v skladu z Direktivo 2001/82/ES ali Uredbo 726/2004/ES, uprabljajo v naslednjih izjemnih okoliščinah:
animals presenting salmonella infection with clinical signs in a way likely to cause undue suffering to the animals; the infected breeding flocks treated with antimicrobials shall still be considered infected with salmonella, and appropriate measures shall be taken to reduce as much as possible the risk of spreading salmonella through the rest of the breeding pyramid;
živali, ki kažejo klinične znake okužbe s salmonelo na način, ki tem živalim verjetno povzroča prekomerno trpljenje; okužene matične jate, zdravljene z protimikrobnimi sredstvi, se še naprej štejejo za okužene s salmonelo, in sprejmejo se ustrezni ukrepi, da se čim bolj zmanjša tveganje za širjenje salmonele v preostali del vzrejne piramide;
salvaging of valuable genetic material, including ‘elite flocks’, flocks from endangered breeds, and flocks kept for research purposes, in order to establish new salmonella-free flocks; chicks born from hatching eggs collected from treated animals shall be subject to fortnightly sampling during the rearing phase, with a scheme aiming to detect 1 % prevalence of relevant salmonella with a 95 % confidence limit;
rešitev koristnega genetskega materiala, vključno z „elitnimi jatami“ iz ogroženih pasem, in jat, namenjenih za raziskave, da se pridobijo nove jate, ki niso okužene s salmonelo; piščanci, izvaljeni iz valilnih jajc, ki izvirajo iz zdravljenih živali, so predmet štirinajstdnevnega vzorčenja v fazi vzreje, s programom, namenjenim odkrivanju 1 % razširjenosti zadevne salmonele z 95 % mejo zaupanja;
authorisation given by the competent authority on a case by case basis for purposes other than salmonella control in a flock suspect of salmonella infection, in particular following detection of salmonella at the hatchery or at the holding; however, Member States may decide to allow treatment without prior authorisation in emergency situations, subject to reporting the treatment immediately to the competent authority.
dovoljenje zadevnega organa za vsak primer posebej za namene, ki niso nameni nadzora salmonele v jatah, za katere se sumi, da so okužene s salmonelo, zlasti po odkritju salmonele v valilnici ali v na kmetijskem gospodarstvu; vendar pa se lahko države članice odločijo, da dovolijo zdravljenje brez predhodnega dovoljeja v izrednih razmerah, pri čemer je treba o zdravljenju takoj poročati pristojnemu organu.
The use of antimicrobials shall be subject to authorisation and supervision of the competent authority and shall be based wherever possible on the results of bacteriological sampling and of susceptibility testing.
Za uporabo protimikrobnih sredstev je potrebno dovoljenje in nadzor s strani pristojnega organa ter, kjer je to mogoče, mora uporaba temeljiti na rezultatih bakteriološkega vzorčenja in testiranja odpornosti.
Use of vaccines
Uporaba cepiv
Live salmonella vaccines for which the manufacturer does not provide an appropriate method to distinguish bacteriologically wild-type strains of salmonella from vaccine strains shall not be used in the framework of national control programmes adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003.
Živa cepiva proti salmoneli, za katera proizvajalec ne zagotovi ustrezne bakteriološke metode za razlikovanje med divjimi sevi salmonele in sevi cepiva, se v okviru nacionalnih programov nadzora, sprejetih v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2160/2003, ne uporabljajo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1092/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1092/2005
suspending the system of advances of aid to compensate for loss of income from marketing in the banana sector in respect of 2005
o začasni opustitvi sistema predujmov pomoči za nadomestitev izpada dohodka od prodaje v sektorju banan za leto 2005
Articles 4, 5 and 7 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1858/93 [2], lay down rules applicable to the submission of applications for advances under the aid scheme to compensate for loss of income from marketing in the banana sector provided for in Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 404/93.
Členi 4, 5 in 7 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 1858/93 [2] vsebujejo določbe, ki se uporabljajo pri vlaganju zahtevkov za predujem iz sistema pomoči za nadomestitev izpada dohodka od prodaje v sektorju banan, določenega v členu 12 Uredbe (EGS) št. 404/93.
Prices in the Community production regions are much higher than those in the corresponding period in previous years, and remain at a relatively high level.
Cene v proizvodnih območjih Skupnosti so občutno višje od cen v ustreznih obdobjih preteklih let in ostajajo precej visoke.
If this situation continues, compensatory aid for 2005 will be fixed, in due course, at a level far below the amounts fixed in respect of previous years.
Če se bo takšno stanje nadaljevalo, bo znesek kompenzacijske pomoči za leto 2005 precej nižji od zneskov, določenih za pretekla leta.
As a result, producers will be required to reimburse a large proportion of the amounts received in the form of advances.
Zaradi določitve precej nižjega zneska pomoči bodo morali proizvajalci povrniti velik del zneskov, ki so jih prejeli v okviru predujma.
A substantial reduction in the unit value of the advances fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/2005 of 4 May 2005 fixing the compensatory aid for bananas produced and marketed in the Community in 2004 and the unit value of the advances for 2005 [3] will not remedy the consequences of such a situation.
Precejšnje znižanje zneska predujmov na enoto, določenega z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 703/2005 z dne 4. maja 2005 o določitvi zneska kompenzacijske pomoči za banane, pridelane in tržene v Skupnosti leta 2004, in vrednosti predujmov na enoto za leto 2005 [3], ne bo odpravilo posledic takšnega stanja.
In order to preserve the financial interests of the Community and to avoid the subsequent obligation on producers to repay advances, the application of rules on the submission of applications for advances and on the payment of such advances laid down by Regulation (EEC) No 1858/93 should be suspended.
Zaradi varovanja finančnih interesov Skupnosti in da proizvajalcem kasneje ne bo treba vračati predujmov, je treba začasno opustiti uporabo določb glede vlaganja zahtevkov za predujme in izplačevanje predujmov, določenih z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1858/93.
The payment of advances for bananas marketed after 30 April 2005 and the submission of new applications should accordingly be suspended.
Zato se začasno opusti plačevanje predujmov za banane, tržene po 30. aprilu 2005, kot tudi vlaganje novih zahtevkov.
This Regulation should therefore apply from 1 July 2005.
Ta uredba se uporablja z dnem 1. julija 2005.
The measures provided for in this regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Bananas,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za banane –
The submission of applications for advances on the compensatory aid provided for in Articles 4, 5 and 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1858/93 in respect of 2005 is hereby suspended.
Vlaganje zahtevkov za kompenzacijsko pomoč iz členov 4, 5 in 7 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1858/93 za leto 2005 se začasno opusti.
Notwithstanding Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 1858/93, no advances on the compensatory aid will be paid for bananas marketed after 30 April 2005.
Z odstopanjem od člena 10 Uredbe (EGS) št. 1858/93 se predujmi kompenzacijske pomoči za banane, tržene po 30. aprilu 2005, ne izplačajo.
It shall apply from 1 July 2005.
Uporablja se od 1. julija 2005 naprej.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 789/2005 (OJ L 132, 26.5.2005, p. 13).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 789/2005 (UL L 132, 26.5.2005, str. 13).
OJ L 118, 5.5.2005, p. 12.
UL L 118, 5.5.2005, str. 12.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1093/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1093/2005
on the issuing of system A3 export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes, apples and peaches)
o izdaji izvoznih dovoljenj sistema A3 za sadje in zelenjavo (paradižnike, pomaranče, namizno grozdje, jabolka in breskve)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 979/2005 [2] opens an invitation to tender setting the indicative refund rates and indicative quantities for system A3 export licences, which may be issued, other than those tendered for as part of food aid.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 979/2005 [2] se razpiše natečaj, pri čemer se določijo okvirne stopnje nadomestil in okvirne količine, za katere se lahko izdajo izvozna dovoljenja sistema A3.
In the case of tomatoes, oranges, table grapes, apples and peaches, the maximum rate necessary to award licences for the indicative quantity up to the quantities tendered for is not more than one-and-a-half times the indicative refund rate,
Za paradižnike, pomaranče, namizno grozdje, jabolka in breskve najvišja stopnja, potrebna za dodelitev dovoljenj za okvirno količino v meji ponujenih količin, ni večja od en- in pol-kratne okvirne stopnje nadomestil –
In the case of tomatoes, oranges, table grapes, apples and peaches, the maximum refund rates and the percentages for reducing the quantities awarded under the invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 979/2005 shall be fixed in the Annex.
Za paradižnike, pomaranče, namizno grozdje, jabolka in breskve so najvišje stopnje nadomestil in odstotki količin dodeljeni v okviru natečaja, razpisanega z Uredbo (ES) št. 979/2005, določeni v Prilogi.
OJ L 166, 28.6.2005, p. 5.
UL L 166, 28.6.2005, str. 5.
Issuing of system A3 export licences in the fruit and vegetable sector (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes, apples and peaches)
Izdaja izvoznih dovoljenj sistema A3 za sadje in zelenjavo (paradižniki, pomaranče, namizno grozdje, jabolka in breskve)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1094/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1094/2005
to the Commission Regulation of 12 July 2005 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. julija 2005 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za oljčno olje
Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1095/2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in Vietnam, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Vietnama in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1524/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu koles po poreklu iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Articles 9 and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 9 in 11(3) Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 [2] imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of 30,6 % on imports of bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China (the original measures).
Svet je z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2474/93 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 30,6 % na uvoz koles s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), („prvotni ukrepi“).
Following an anti-circumvention investigation, this duty was extended by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 [3] to imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Po preiskavi za preprečitev izogibanja se je z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 71/97 [3] ta dajatev razširila na uvoz določenih delov za kolesa s poreklom iz LRK.
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation (the previous investigation), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 [4], decided that the above mentioned measures should be maintained.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe („predhodna preiskava“) je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1524/2000 [4] sklenil, da se zgoraj omenjeni ukrepi ohranijo.
Present investigations
Trenutne preiskave
On 29 April 2004, the Commission announced, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Community of bicycles originating in Vietnam.
Komisija je 29. aprila 2004 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom koles s poreklom iz Vietnama v Skupnost.
On the same day, pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6], the initiation of an interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports into the Community of bicycles originating in the PRC.
Na isti dan je Komisija v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6], objavila začetek vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK v Skupnost.
The anti-dumping investigations were initiated following a complaint and a request lodged on 15 March 2004 by the European Bicycles Manufacturers Association (EBMA or the applicant), acting on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 35 % of the total Community production of bicycles.
Protidampinške preiskave so bile uvedene na podlagi pritožbe in zahtevka, ki ju je 15. marca 2004 vložil European Bicycles Manufacturers Association („EBMA“ ali „vlagatelj“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 35 %, skupne proizvodnje koles Skupnosti.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting thereof, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of the proceeding concerning imports of bicycles originating in Vietnam.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu zadevnega izdelka in znatni škodi, ki iz njega izvira, kar se je štelo kot zadostno za začetek postopka, ki zadeva uvoz koles s poreklom iz Vietnama.
The request contained sufficient evidence justifying the initiation of an interim review of the measures applicable to imports of bicycles originating in the PRC.
Zahtevek je vseboval zadostne dokaze za začetek vmesnega pregleda ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz koles s poreklom iz LRK.
The Commission officially advised the applicant, the Community producers mentioned in the complaint and the request, any other known Community producers, the exporting producers, importers as well as the associations known to be concerned, and the authorities of the PRC and Vietnam, of the initiation of the investigations.
Komisija je vlagatelja, proizvajalce Skupnosti, navedene v pritožbi in zahtevku, in ostale znane proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike in združenja, za katera je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter organe LRK in Vietnama uradno obvestila o začetku preiskave.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time-limits set in the notices of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila ponujena možnost, da v časovnih okvirih, ki so določeni v obvestilih o začetku, svoja stališča pisno izrazijo in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
A number of Community producers represented by the applicant, other cooperating Community producers, exporting producers, importers, suppliers and user associations made their views known.
Številni proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki jih predstavlja vlagatelj, drugi sodelujoči proizvajalci Skupnosti, proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki, dobavitelji in združenja uporabnikov so izrazili svoja mnenja.
All interested parties who so requested were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so to zahtevale, je bilo odobreno zaslišanje.
In view of the large number of exporting producers, Community producers and importers involved in the investigations, the application of sampling techniques was envisaged in both notices of initiation, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi velikega števila proizvajalcev izvoznikov, proizvajalcev Skupnosti in uvoznikov, vključenih v preiskavo, je bila v obeh obvestilih o začetku predvidena uporaba tehnik vzorčenja v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, exporting producers and representatives acting on their behalf, Community producers and importers were requested to make themselves known and to provide information as specified in the notices of initiation.
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če je, da bi izbrala vzorec, so bili proizvajalci izvozniki in zastopniki, ki delujejo v njihovem imenu, proizvajalci Skupnosti in uvozniki pozvani, da se javijo in posredujejo podatke, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku.
The Commission also contacted known associations of exporting producers and the authorities of the PRC and Vietnam.
Komisija je tudi stopila v stik z znanimi združenji proizvajalcev izvoznikov in oblastmi LRK in Vietnama.
These parties raised no objections to the use of sampling.
Te stranke niso imele pripomb na uporabo vzorčenja.
In total, 21 exporters/producers in the PRC, 6 exporters/producers in Vietnam, 54 Community producers and 6 importers replied to the sampling questionnaire within the time-limits and provided the requested information.
Skupno 21 izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v LRK, 6 izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Vietnamu, 54 proizvajalcev Skupnosti in 6 uvoznikov je v roku odgovorilo na vprašalnik za vzorčenje in posredovalo zahtevane podatke.
From the 21 Chinese exporting producers that responded to the sampling return, only 17 reported exports of bicycles to the Community during the investigation period.
Od 21 kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so se odzvali na vrnitev vzorcev, jih je samo 17 prijavilo izvoz koles v Skupnost med obdobjem preiskave.
Given the limited number of Vietnamese exporting producers which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was not necessary in respect of Vietnamese exporting producers.
Zaradi omejenega števila vietnamskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje, je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje za vietnamske proizvajalce izvoznike ni potrebno.
The selection of the sample was made in consultation with, and with the consent of the Chinese cooperating exporting producers and the authorities of the PRC.
Vzorec je bil izbran po posvetovanju s sodelujočimi kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki in oblastmi LRK ter z njihovim soglasjem.
The sample of the exporting producers was established on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Community, which could reasonably be investigated within the time available and on whether the companies intended to apply for Market Economy Treatment (MET).
Vzorec proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bil določen na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega izvoza v Skupnost, ki se lahko primerno preišče v razpoložljivem času, in namena podjetij, da zahtevajo obravnavo po načelih tržnega gospodarstva („OTG“).
Only companies that intended to apply for MET were included in the sample, since in an economy in transition, normal value for other companies is established on the basis of prices or constructed normal value of an analogue third country.
V vzorec so bila vključena samo podjetja, ki so nameravala zahtevati OTG, saj je v gospodarstvu v prehodu normalna vrednost za druga podjetja določena na podlagi cen ali konstruirane normalne vrednosti primerljive tretje države.
On this basis, a representative sample of four exporting producers was selected.
Na tej podlagi je bil izbran reprezentativen vzorec štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
The four sampled companies represented, according to the replies to the sampling exercise, 16 % of the Chinese exports of the product concerned to the Community and 35 % of all cooperating producers' exports.
Štiri vzorčene družbe so predstavljale, glede na odgovore pri vzorčenju, 16 % kitajskega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost in 35 % izvoza vseh sodelujočih proizvajalcev.
As for the Community producers, in accordance with Article 17(1) of the basic Regulation, the sample was selected after consultation of the relevant association and with their consent on the basis of the largest representative volume of sales and production within the Community.
Za proizvajalce Skupnosti je bil v skladu s 17(1) osnovne uredbe vzorec izbran po posvetovanju z ustreznimi združenji in z njihovim soglasjem na podlagi največjega reprezentativnega obsega prodaje in proizvodnje znotraj Skupnosti.
As a result, eight Community producers were selected in the sample.
Kot rezultat je bilo v vzorec izbranih osem proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the eight companies selected, which submitted complete replies.
Komisija je vprašalnike poslala osmim izbranim družbam, ki so predložile popolne odgovore.
Given the limited number of importers who replied to the sampling questionnaire and indicated their willingness to cooperate (six importers), it was decided that sampling was not necessary.
Zaradi omejenega števila uvoznikov, ki so odgovorili na vprašalnik za vzorčenje in pokazali pripravljenost za sodelovanje (šest uvoznikov), je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje ni potrebno.