natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Wherever the operating air carrier or carriers is or are changed after reservation, the air carriage contractor shall, irrespective of the reason for the change, take immediately all appropriate steps to ensure that the passenger is informed of the change as soon as possible.
Vedno kadar se dejanski prevoznik ali prevozniki spremenijo po opravljeni rezervaciji, pogodbenik za zračni prevoz ne glede na razlog za spremembo nemudoma opravi vse potrebno za zagotovitev, da so potniki takoj, ko je to mogoče, obveščeni o spremembi.
In all cases, passengers shall be informed at check-in, or on boarding where no check-in is required for a connecting flight.
V vsakem primeru so potniki obveščeni ob prijavi ali ob vkrcanju na zrakoplov v primeru, ko prijava za povezovalni let ni potrebna.
The air carrier or the tour operator, as the case may be, shall ensure that the relevant air carriage contractor is informed of the identity of the operating air carrier or carriers as soon as this is known, in particular in the event of a change of such identity.
Letalski prevoznik ali organizator potovanja zagotovita, da je ustrezni pogodbenik za zračni prevoz obveščen o identiteti dejanskega letalskega prevoznika takoj, ko je le-ta znana, predvsem v primerih ko pride do spremembe identitete.
If a ticket seller has not been informed of the identity of the operating air carrier, it shall not be responsible for not complying with the obligations provided for in this Article.
Če prodajalec vozovnic ni bil obveščen o identiteti dejanskega prevoznika, ne odgovarja, če ne ravna v skladu z obveznostmi iz tega člena.
The obligation of the air carriage contractor to inform passengers of the identity of the operating air carrier or carriers shall be specified in the general terms of sale applicable to the contract of carriage.
Obveznost pogodbenika za zračni prevoz, da potnike obvesti o identiteti dejanskega prevoznika ali prevoznikov, je navedena v splošnih prodajnih pogojih, ki se uporabljajo za prevozno pogodbo.
Right to reimbursement or re-routing
Pravica do povračila stroškov ali spremembe poti
This Regulation shall not affect the right to reimbursement or re-routing as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 261/2004.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na pravico do povračila stroškov ali spremembe poti, kakor je predvidena v Uredbi (ES) št. 261/2004.
In cases where Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 does not apply, and
V primerih, za katere se Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004 ne uporablja in
the operating air carrier notified to the passenger has been entered on the Community list and is subject to an operating ban which has led to the cancellation of the flight concerned, or which would have led to such cancellation if the flight concerned had been operated in the Community
je bil sporočeni dejanski letalski prevoznik uvrščen na seznam Skupnosti ter mu je bilo prepovedano opravljanje letov, kar je povzročilo preklic zadevnega leta ali kar bi ga povzročilo, če bi se zadevni let opravil znotraj Skupnosti;
the operating air carrier notified to the passenger has been replaced by another operating air carrier which has been entered on the Community list and is subject to an operating ban which has led to the cancellation of the flight concerned, or which would have led to such cancellation if the flight concerned had been operated in the Community,
je sporočenega dejanskega letalskega prevoznika zamenjal drugi dejanski letalski prevoznik, ki je bil uvrščen na seznam Skupnosti in mu je bilo prepovedano opravljanje letov, kar je povzročilo preklic zadevnega leta ali kar bi ga povzročilo, če bi se zadevni let opravil znotraj Skupnosti,
the air carriage contractor which is party to the contract of carriage shall offer the passenger the right to reimbursement or re-routing provided for in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, provided that, where the flight has not been cancelled, the passenger has chosen not to take that flight.
pogodbenik za zračni prevoz, ki je stranka prevozne pogodbe, potniku ponudi pravico do povračila stroškov ali spremembe poti, kakor je predvidena v členu 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004, pod pogojem, da se je potnik odločil, da se na ta let ne bo vkrcal, čeprav let ni bil odpovedan.
Paragraph 2 of this Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004.
Odstavek 2 tega člena se uporablja brez poseganja v člen 13 Uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004.
Member States shall ensure compliance with the rules set out in this Chapter and shall lay down penalties for infringement of these rules.
Države članice zagotovijo spoštovanje pravil, ki so določena v tem poglavju, in določijo kazni za njihovo kršitev.
The penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Kazni so učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Information and amendment
Obveščanje in spremembe
By 16 January 2009, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation.
Komisija do 16. januarja 2009 poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te uredbe.
The report shall be accompanied, where necessary, by proposals for the amendment of this Regulation.
Poročilu se, kjer je to potrebno, priložijo predlogi za spremembo te uredbe.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee referred to in Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 (the Committee).
Komisiji pomaga odbor iz člena 12 Uredbe (EGS) št. 3922/91 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Odbor“).
The period referred to in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
Rok iz člena 5(6) Sklepa 1999/468/ES je tri mesece.
The Commission may consult the Committee on any other matter concerning the application of this Regulation.
Komisija se lahko posvetuje z odborom o vseh drugih vprašanjih, povezanih z uporabo te uredbe.
Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/EC is hereby repealed.
Člen 9 Direktive 2004/36/ES se razveljavi.
Articles 10, 11 and 12 shall apply from 16 July 2006 and Article 13 shall apply from 16 January 2007.
Členi 10, 11 in 12 se uporabljajo od 16. julija 2006 in člen 13 se uporablja od 16. januarja 2007.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 November 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 5 December 2005.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. novembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 5. decembra 2005.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2871/2000 (OJ L 333, 29.12.2000, p. 47).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2871/2000 (UL L 333, 29.12.2000, str. 47).
OJ L 220, 29.7.1989, p. 1.
UL L 220, 29.7.1989, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 323/1999 (OJ L 40, 13.2.1999, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 323/1999 (UL L 40, 13.2.1999, str. 1).
OJ L 95, 21.4.1993, p. 29.
UL L 95, 21.4.1993, str. 29.
Common criteria for consideration of an operating ban for safety reasons at Community level
Skupna merila za obravnavo prepovedi opravljanja letov iz varnostnih razlogov na ravni Skupnosti
Decisions on action at Community level shall be taken according to the merits of each individual case.
Odločitve o ukrepih na ravni Skupnosti se sprejmejo po proučitvi vsakega posameznega primera.
Depending upon the merits of each case, a carrier or all the carriers certified in the same state might be eligible for action at Community level.
Glede na dejansko stanje posameznega primera se lahko za prevoznika ali vse prevoznike, ki so certificirani v isti državi, uporabijo ukrepi na ravni Skupnosti.
In considering whether an air carrier should be totally or partially banned, it shall be assessed whether the air carrier is meeting the relevant safety standards taking into account the following:
Pri odločanju, ali naj se letalskemu prevozniku naloži popolno ali delno prepoved se oceni, ali letalski prevoznik izpolnjuje ustrezne varnostne standarde ob upoštevanju:
Verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of an air carrier:
Preverjenih dokazil o resnih pomanjkljivostih glede varnosti na strani letalskega prevoznika:
Reports showing serious safety deficiencies, or persistent failure by the carrier to address deficiencies identified by ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme previously communicated to the carrier.
Poročil, ki kažejo na resne pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti ali trajne nesposobnosti prevoznika za odzivanje na pomanjkljivosti, zabeležene med preverjanji na letališki ploščadi, ki so se izvajala v okviru programa SAFA, o katerih so bili prevozniki predhodno obveščeni.
Serious safety deficiencies identified within the framework of the provisions for the gathering of information in Article 3 of Directive 2004/36/EC on the safety of third-country aircraft.
Resne pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti, zabeležene v okviru določb o zbiranju informacij iz člena 3 Direktive 2004/36/ES o varnosti zrakoplovov tretjih držav.
Operating ban imposed on a carrier by a third country because of substantiated deficiencies related to international safety standards.
Prepoved opravljanja letov prevozniku s strani tretje države zaradi dokazanih pomanjkljivosti, povezanih z mednarodnimi varnostnimi standardi.
Substantiated accident-related information or serious incident-related information indicating latent systemic safety deficiencies.
Utemeljenih informacij, povezanih z nesrečami ali resnimi incidenti, ki kažejo na latentne sistemske pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti.
Lack of ability and/or willingness of an air carrier to address safety deficiencies as demonstrated by:
Pomanjkanje sposobnosti in/ali pripravljenosti letalskega prevoznika za odzivanje na pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti, ki se izkazuje:
Lack of transparency or adequate and timely communication on the part of a carrier in response to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of a Member State regarding the safety aspect of its operation.
S pomanjkanjem preglednosti ali primernega in pravočasnega obveščanja s strani prevoznika v odgovor na poizvedbe organa civilnega letalstva države članice v zvezi z varnostnimi vidiki njegovih operacij.
Inappropriate or insufficient corrective action plan presented in response to an identified serious safety deficiency.
Z neprimernim ali nezadostnim korekcijskim akcijskim načrtom kot odgovorom na ugotovljeno resno varnostno pomanjkljivost.
Lack of ability and/or willingness of the authorities responsible for the oversight of an air carrier to address safety deficiencies as demonstrated by:
Pomanjkanje sposobnosti in/ali pripravljenosti organov, pristojnih za nadzor letalskega prevoznika, za odzivanje na pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti, ki se izkazuje:
Lack of cooperation with the civil aviation authority of a Member State by the competent authorities of another state, when concerns about the safety of the operation of a carrier licensed or certified in that state have been raised.
S pomanjkanjem sodelovanja z organi civilnega letalstva države članice s strani pristojnih organov druge države članice pri obravnavanju problematike varnosti delovanja prevoznika, ki ima licenco ali je certificiran v tej državi.
Insufficient ability of the competent authorities with regulatory oversight of the carrier to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards.
Z nesposobnostjo pristojnih organov, ki imajo regulativni nadzor nad prevoznikom, da izvajajo in krepijo ustrezne varnostne standarde.
Particular account should be taken of the following:
Še posebej je treba upoštevati:
audits and related corrective action plans established under ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme or under any applicable Community law;
preglede in povezane korekcijske akcijske načrte, predvidene v sklopu programa „Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme“ Mednarodne organizacije za civilni letalski promet ali na podlagi katerega koli veljavnega predpisa Skupnosti;
whether the operating authorisation or technical permission of any carrier under the oversight of that state has previously been refused or revoked by another state;
ali je bilo dovoljenje za opravljanje prometa ali tehnično dovoljenje katerega koli prevoznika pod nadzorom tiste države predhodno zavrnjeno ali preklicano s strani druge države;
the air operator’s certificate has not been issued by the competent authority of the state where the carrier has its principle place of business.
ali je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika izdano s strani pristojnega organa države, kjer ima prevoznik glavni kraj poslovanja.
Insufficient ability of the competent authorities of the state in which the aircraft used by the air carrier is registered to oversee the aircraft used by the carrier in accordance with its obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Z nesposobnostjo pristojnih organov države, v kateri je registriran zrakoplov, ki ga letalski prevoznik uporablja, da bi v skladu z obveznostmi, ki za državo izhajajo iz Čikaške konvencije, nadzorovali zrakoplov.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2112/2005
The untying of aid is not an aim in itself, but should be used as a tool to cross-fertilise other elements in the fight against poverty, such as ownership, regional integration and capacity building, with a focus on empowering local and regional suppliers of goods and services in developing countries.
Sproščanje pomoči ni cilj samo po sebi, ampak mora biti uporabljeno kot pripomoček, ki bi spodbudil uspešnost ostalih elementov v boju proti revščini, kot so lastništvo, regionalno povezovanje in večanje zmogljivosti, s poudarkom na okrepitvi moči lokalnih in regionalnih dobaviteljev blaga in storitev v državah v razvoju.
In March 2001, the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) adopted a ‘Recommendation on Untying Official Development Assistance to the Least Developed Countries’ [2].
Marca 2001 je Odbor za razvojno pomoč (DAC) Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) sprejel „Priporočilo o sproščanju uradne razvojne pomoči najmanj razvitim državam“ [2].
The Member States adopted that recommendation and the Commission recognised the spirit of this recommendation as guidance for Community aid.
Države članice so sprejele to priporočilo in Komisija je sprejela idejo tega priporočila kot smernico za pomoč Skupnosti.
On 14 March 2002, the General Affairs Council held in parallel with the European Council in Barcelona in preparation for the International Conference on Financing for Development, convened in Monterrey on 18 to 22 March 2002, concluded that the European Union would ‘implement the DAC recommendation on untying of aid to least developed countries and continue discussions in view of further untying bilateral aid.
marca 2002 je Svet za splošne zadeve, ki je zasedal istočasno z Evropskim svetom v Barceloni, pri pripravah na mednarodno konferenco o financiranju razvoja, ki je potekala v Monterreyu od 18. do 22. marca 2002, sklenil, da bo Evropska unija „izvedla priporočila DAC o sproščanju pomoči najmanj razvitim državam in nadaljevala razprave o nadaljnjem sproščanju dvostranske pomoči.
It presented the Commission’s views on the issue and possible options for the implementation of the abovementioned Barcelona commitment within the EU aid assistance system.
V njem so predstavljena stališča Komisije o tej zadevi in morebitne možnosti za izvajanje zgoraj imenovane obveze iz Barcelone na podlagi sistema pomoči EU.
On 4 September 2003, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on the abovementioned Commission communication [3], in which it noted the need to further untie Community aid.
septembra 2003 je Evropski parlament sprejel resolucijo o zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije [3], v kateri je ugotovil potrebo po nadaljnjem sproščanju pomoči Skupnosti.
Specific provisions concerning humanitarian aid are laid down in Article 9.
Posebne določbe za potrebe humanitarne pomoči so določene v členu 9.
Access to Community external assistance is defined in the basic acts regulating such assistance, in conjunction with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [4] (hereinafter the Financial Regulation).
Dostop do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti je opredeljen v temeljnem aktu, ki ureja tovrstno pomoč, v povezavi z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [4] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „finančna uredba“).
For the interpretation of the terms used in this Regulation, reference is made to the Financial Regulation and to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5].Article 3
Za razlago pojmov iz te uredbe se je treba sklicevati na finančno uredbo in Uredbo Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [5].Člen 3
Such a decision shall be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [6] under the procedures and relevant committee associated with the act concerned.
Taka odločitev se sprejme v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [6] po postopkih v pristojnem odboru, povezanim z zadevnim aktom.
Derogations as provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 may be justified on the basis of the unavailability of products and services in the markets of the countries concerned, for reasons of extreme urgency, or if the eligibility rules would make the realisation of a project, a programme or an action impossible or exceedingly difficult.
Odstopanja, predvidena v odstavkih 1 in 2, so lahko utemeljena, če izdelki in storitve na trgih zadevnih držav niso dostopni, v izredno nujnih primerih, ali če pravila o upravičenosti onemogočijo uresničitev projekta, programa ali dejavnosti ali ga prekomerno otežijo.
For the purposes of humanitarian aid, within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid [7] and for the purposes of aid channeled directly through NGOs, within the meaning of Council Regulation (EC) No 1658/98 of 17 July 1998 on co-financing operations with European non-governmental development organisations (NGOs) in fields of interest to the developing countries [8], the provisions of Article 3 shall not apply to the eligibility criteria established for the selection of grant beneficiaries.
Za človekoljubno pomoč v smislu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/96 z dne 20. junija 1996 o humanitarni pomoči [7] in za namen pomoči, ki jo direktno posredujejo NVO, v smislu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1658/98 z dne 17. julija 1998 o sofinanciranju ukrepov z evropskimi nevladnimi razvojnimi organizacijami (NVO) na področjih v interesu držav v razvoju [8], se določbe iz člena 3 te uredbe ne uporabljajo za merila o ustreznosti, ki so uvedena za izbiro upravičencev.
Beneficiaries of these grants shall abide by the rules established in this Regulation where the implementation of the assisted humanitarian action and aid channeled directly through NGOs within the meaning of Regulation (EC) no 1658/98 requires the award of procurement contracts.
Upravičenci teh nepovratnih sredstev se držijo pravil iz te uredbe, kadar izvajanje ukrepov, za katere je odobrena pomoč, in pomoč, ki jo direktno posredujejo NVO v smislu Uredbe (ES) št. 1658/98, zahteva oddajo javnih naročil.
In order to accelerate the eradication of poverty through the promotion of local capacities, markets and purchases, special consideration shall be given to local and regional procurement in partner countries.
Da bi pospešili izkoreninjenje revščine s pospeševanjem lokalnih zmogljivosti, trgov in nakupov, je treba posebej preučiti lokalna in regionalna javna naročila v partnerskih državah.
OECD/DAC 2001 Report, 2002, Volume 3, No 1, p. 46.
Poročilo OECD/DAC za leto 2001, 2002, zvezek 3, št. 1, str. 46.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1261/2005 (OJ L 201, 2.8.2005, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1261/2005 (UL L 201, 2.8.2005, str. 3).
The following amendments are made to the Community instruments listed hereafter.
Spodaj našteti instrumenti Skupnosti se spremenijo na naslednji način:
PART A — Community instruments with a thematic scope
DEL A – Instrumenti Skupnosti s tematskim področjem uporabe
Council Regulation (EC) No 1725/2001 of 23 July 2001 concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in third countries other than developing countries [1]:
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1725/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih za boj proti protipehotnim minam v tretjih državah z izjemo držav v razvoju [1]:
Article 4(2) is replaced by the following:
člen 4(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Eligibility for participation in tendering procedures under this Regulation shall be determined in accordance with the rules of eligibility, and the derogations therefrom, set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 of 21 November 2005 on access to Community external assistance:
Upravičenost do udeležbe v razpisnih postopkih v skladu s to uredbo je določena glede na pravila o upravičenosti ter odstopanja od njih, kakor je določeno v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2112/2005 z dne 21. novembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti.
‘Participation in contractual procedures implemented through an international organisation or co-financed with a third country is defined in the Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005.’
„Udeležba v pogodbenih postopkih, ki jih izvaja mednarodna organizacija ali jih sofinancira tretja država, je določena v Uredbi (ES) št. 2112/2005.“
Council Regulation (EC) No 976/1999 of 29 April 1999 laying down the requirements for the implementation of Community operations, other than those of development cooperation, which, within the framework of Community cooperation policy, contribute to the general objective of developing and consolidating democracy and the rule of law and to that of respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms in third countries [3]:
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 976/1999 z dne 29. aprila 1999 o določitvi zahtev za izvajanje dejavnosti Skupnosti, razen razvojnega sodelovanja, ki v okviru politike sodelovanja Skupnosti prispevajo k splošnemu cilju razvijati in krepiti demokracijo in pravno državo ter spoštovati človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine v tretjih državah [3]:
in Article 5(1) the following sentence is added:
v členu 5(1) se doda naslednji stavek:
‘Eligibility for grant contracts shall be further determined in accordance with the rules of eligibility, and the derogations therefrom, set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005 0f 21 November 2005 on access to Community external assistance.Article 6 is replaced by the following:
„Upravičenost do naročil na podlagi nepovratnih sredstev se nadalje določi glede na pravila o upravičenosti ter odstopanja od njih, kakor je določeno v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2112/2005 z dne 21. novembra 2005 o dostopu do zunanje pomoči Skupnosti.člen 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
To be eligible for Community aid, the partners referred to in Article 5(1) must have their main headquarters in a country eligible for Community aid under this Regulation, as well as under Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005.
Da so upravičeni do pomoči Skupnosti, morajo imeti partnerji iz člena 5(1) svoj glavni sedež v državi, ki je upravičena do pomoči Skupnosti v skladu s to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 2112/2005.
Such headquarters must be the effective decision-making centre for all operations financed under this Regulation.
Ta sedež mora biti dejansko središče sprejemanja odločitev za vse dejavnosti, ki se financirajo v skladu s to uredbo.
Exceptionally, the headquarters may be in another third country.’
Izjemoma je lahko sedež v drugi tretji državi.“ ,
Article 9 is replaced by the following:
člen 9 se nadomesti z naslednjim: