natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Acceptance of this aid would entail including HCz in the list of recipients, and would increase the amount of state aid which could be granted to the Polish steel industry, which would disturb the balance between state aid commitments and distortion of competition.
Sprejetje te pomoči bi pomenilo, da je HCz na seznamu prejemnikov, in prispeva k zvišanju zneska državne pomoči, ki bi lahko bila odobrena poljski jeklarski industriji, kar bi vznemirilo ravnovesje med dodelitvijo sredstev za državno pomoč in izkrivljanjem konkurence.
The Commission could not approve such a change without the consent of the Council.
Komisija ne more sprejeti takšne spremembe brez soglasja Sveta.
COMPLIANCE WITH POINT 4 OF PROTOCOL NO 8
IZPOLNJEVANJE OBVEZNOSTI IZ TOČKE 4 PROTOKOLA ŠT. 8
The Commission does not consider the sale of the subsidiaries of HCz and HCSz to be in breach of Point 4 of Protocol No 8.
Komisija prodaje hčerinskih podjetij HCz in HCSz ne razume kot v nasprotju s točko 4 Protokola št. 8.
Point 4 of Protocol No 8 states that: ‘A benefiting company may not:
Točka 4 Protokola št. 8 navaja, da: „Upravičeno podjetje ne sme:
in the case of a merger with a company not included in Annex 1, pass on the benefit of the aid granted to the benefiting company,
v primeru združitve s podjetjem, ki ni vključeno v Prilogi 1, prenesti ugodnosti odobrene pomoči na upravičeno podjetje,
take over the assets of any company not included in Annex 1 which is declared bankrupt in the period up to 31 December 2006.’
prevzeti sredstev kateregakoli podjetja, ki ni vključeno v Prilogi 1 in je razglasilo stečaj v obdobju do 31. decembra 2006“.
The NRP (cf. point 25) reiterated that this provision was intended to prevent a recipient under Protocol No 8 acquiring HCz assets or shares.
NPP (primerjaj točko 26) ponavlja, da je bil namen te določbe, da se v skladu s Protokolom št. 8 prejemniku prepreči, da prevzame sredstva ali delnice HCz.
The Commission takes the view that point 4(a) and not point 4(b) of Protocol No 8 should be considered in the present case, as it does not involve a sale of assets but a sale of shares which is considered a merger.
Komisija je mnenja, da se mora v tem primeru uporabiti točka 4(a) in ne točka 4(b) Protokola št. 8, saj ne vključuje prodaje sredstev, temveč prodajo delnic, kar se smatra za združitev.
In practice, the strategic investor will acquire only shares in companies and not individual assets.
V praksi bo strateški investitor pridobil samo delnice v podjetjih in ne posameznih sredstev.
Moreover, application of point 4(b) suffices for bankruptcy of HCz, which has not been declared.
Uporaba točke 4(b) tudi zadostuje za stečaj HCz, ki ni bil razglašen.
The Commission does not see any infringement of point 4(a) of Protocol No 8, as the provision is clearly addressed to recipients under Protocol No 8 and neither Donbass nor LNM are recipients under that Protocol.
Komisija ne vidi nobene kršitve točke 4(a) Protokola št. 8, saj je določba jasno naslovljena na prejemnike v skladu s Protokolom št. 8 in niti Donbass niti LNM nista prejemnika v skladu s tem protokolom.
It is true that LNM has acquired a recipient, namely MSP.
Res je, da je LNM pridobil prejemnika, namreč MSP.
However, the Commission has no evidence that LNM is acting in behalf of or as an agent of MSP.
Vendar Komisija nima nobenih dokazov, da LNM deluje v imenu MSP ali kot njegov zastopnik.
Instead, LNM and MSP are run as separate companies on a stand-alone basis.
Namesto tega LNM in MSP delujeta kot ločeni podjetji na neodvisni osnovi.
Even if the Commission were to understand the rationale of the above provision as prohibiting any cross-subsidisation between recipients (possibly MSP) and non-recipients (here HCz), the Commission has been provided with sufficient assurances that any buyer will abstain from cross-subsidising HCz from the aid received under the NRP.
Tudi če bi Komisija razumela utemeljitev navedene določbe kot prepoved vsakega navzkrižnega subvencioniranja med prejemniki (po možnosti MSP) in neprejemniki (v tem primeru HCz), je Komisija pridobila zadostna zagotovila, da se bo vsak kupec vzdržal navzkrižnega subvencioniranja HCz iz pomoči, prejete skladno z NPP.
Indeed, not just Poland but also LNM have given undertakings (see points 78 and point 105) to underline these assurances,
Ne samo Poljska, temveč tudi LNM so se zavezali k obveznostim (glej točke 79 in točko 106), da še poudarijo svoja zagotovila.
The measures which Poland has implemented for the operation of Huta Stali Częstochowa Sp z o.o. do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Ukrepi, ki jih je Poljska izvajala za dejavnosti Huta Stali Częstochowa Sp z.o.o., ne predstavljajo pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The state aid which Poland awarded for R&D amounting to PLN 5461620 for Huta Częstochowa S.A. and PLN 1328000 for Huta Stali Częstochowa Sp z o.o. is compatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v znesku 5461620 PLN, ki jo je Poljska podelila za R&R za Huta Częstochowa S.A., in 1328000 PLN za Huta Stali Częstochowa Sp z o.o. je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The state aid which Poland awarded to Huta Częstochowa S.A. between 1997 and May 2002 as operating aid and aid for employment restructuring amounting to PLN 19699452 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Poljska podelila Huta Częstochowa S.A. med letom 1997 in majem 2002 kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje in pomoč za prestrukturiranje zaposlovanja v znesku 19699452 PLN, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Poland shall take all necessary measures to recover from Huta Częstochowa S.A., Regionalny Fundusz Gospodarczy, Majątek Hutniczy Sp. z o.o. and Operator Sp. z o.o. the aid referred to in paragraph 1 and unlawfully made available to Huta Częstochowa S.A. All these companies shall be jointly and severally liable.
Poljska sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da pomoč iz odstavka 1, ki je bila nezakonito na razpolago Huta Częstochowa S.A., izterja od Huta Częstochowa S.A., Regionalny Fundusz Gospodarczy, Majątek Hutniczy Sp. z o.o. in Operator Sp. z o.o.. Vsa ta podjetja so solidarno odgovorna.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective enforcement of the decision.
Izterjava se izvede brez zamude in v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje pod pogojem, da dopuščajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvrševanje odločbe.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were made available to Huta Częstochowa S.A. until their actual recovery.
Izterjana vsota vključuje obresti od dne, od katerega so bila sredstva na razpolago Huta Częstochowa S.A., do njihove dejanske izterjave.
The interest shall be calculated in conformity with the provisions laid down in Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti se izračunajo v skladu z določbami iz poglavja V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months of receiving notification of this Decision, Poland shall inform the Commission of the measures already taken and planned to comply with it.
Poljska v roku dveh mesecev od prejema obvestila o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih je že sprejela in ki jih namerava izvesti.
It shall provide this information using the questionnaire attached to Annex 1 of this Decision.
Informacije zagotovi s pomočjo vprašalnika, ki je priložen Prilogi 1 te odločbe.
In particular, Poland shall provide the Commission, within that deadline, with any documents which can prove that the recovery process has been initiated vis-à-vis the entities responsible for reimbursing the unlawful aid.
Poljska v tem skrajnem roku Komisiji zlasti zagotovi vse dokumente, s katerimi lahko dokaže, da se je postopek izterjave proti podjetjem, odgovornim za povračilo nezakonite pomoči, pričel.
The Commission approves the proposed change in the Polish National Restructuring Plan under point 10 of Protocol No 8 to the Accession Treaty in so far as it will permit the restructuring of Huta Częstochowa S.A. without state aid and without increasing capacity.
Komisija potrjuje predlagane spremembe poljskega nacionalnega načrta za prestrukturiranje v skladu s točko 10 Protokola št. 8 k Pristopni pogodbi, tako da bo dovolila prestrukturiranje Huta Częstochowa S.A. brez državne pomoči in brez povečanja zmogljivosti.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Poland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Poljsko.
Done at Brussels, 5 July 2005.
V Bruslju, 5 julij 2005.
OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 948.
UL L 236, 23.9.2003, str. 948.
OJ C 204, 12.8.2004, p. 6.
UL C 204, 12.8.2004, str. 6.
For details see: COMP/ECSC 1351 Usinor/Arbed/Aceralia, Commission decision of 21 November 2001, para. 88.
Za podrobnosti glej: COMP/ECSC 1351 Usinor/Arbed/Aceralia, Odločba Komisije z dne 21. novembra 2001, odstavek 88.
Rurexpol is specialised in the production of seamless tubes, products used for drilling applications and boilers.
Rurexpol je specializiran za proizvodnjo brezšivnih cevi, proizvodov za uporabo v vrtanju ter grelcev.
It has a capacity of 60,000 tonnes.
Njegova zmogljivost znaša 60000 ton.
Its sales in 2003 and 2004 exceeded PLN 200 million annually.
Njegova prodaja je v letih 2003 in 2004 presegla 200 milijonov PLN letno.
On the assumption that EUR 1 is about PLN 4,75.
Ob predpostavki, da je 1 EUR približno 4,75 PLN.
This was the average exchange rate in May 2004 when Poland joined the EU and the opening decision was taken.
To je bil povprečni menjalni tečaj maja 2004, ko se je Poljska pridružila EU in je bila sprejeta odločitev o uvedbi.
Legal Gazette No 111, item 1196.
Uradni list št. 111, točka 1196.
For more information on LNM holdings see Commission Decision PHS/LNM of 5 February 2004 in case COMP/M 3326, which clarified the acquisition of a Polish steel company under the Merger Regulation.
Za več podatkov o holdingu LNM glej Odločbo Komisije PHS/LNM z dne 5. februarja 2004 v zadevi COMP/M 3326, ki je razjasnila pridobitev poljskega jeklarskega podjetja po Uredbi o združitvi.
The other recipients are the following seven steel-producing companies: Huta Bankowa, Huta Buczek, Huta Lucchini-Warszawa, Huta Labędy, Huta Pokόj, Huta Andrzej and Huta Batory.
Med druge prejemnike spada naslednjih sedem podjetij, ki proizvajajo jeklo: Huta Bankowa, Huta Buczek, Huta Lucchini-Warszawa, Huta Labędy, Huta Pokόj, Huta Andrzej in Huta Batory.
The last two have since been declared bankrupt.
Zadnji dve sta med tem razglasili stečaj.
In fact the Council took two decisions, one in July 2002 prolonging the grace period under the conditions of a credible restructuring programme and individual business plans pursuant to Article 8(4) of Protocol 2 of the Europe Agreement and one in June 2003 endorsing the plans submitted in April 2003, with the result that the grace period to grant state aid was prolonged until the end of 2003.
Pravzaprav je Svet sprejel dve odločbi, eno julija 2002, ki je podaljšala plačilni rok pod pogoji verodostojnega programa prestrukturiranja in posameznih poslovnih načrtov v skladu s členom 8(4) Protokola 2 k Evropskem sporazumu, in drugo junija 2003, ki je potrdila načrte, predložene aprila 2003, kar je imelo za posledico, da je bil plačilni rok za dodelitev državne pomoči podaljšan do konca leta 2003.
Normally state aid to the steel sector is not allowed in the EU; see Communication from the Commission on Rescue and Restructuring aid and closure for the steel sector (OJ C 70 of 19.3.2002, p. 21).
Državna pomoč za jeklarski sektor v EU običajno ni dovoljena; glej Sporočilo Komisije o pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje ter zapiranja za jeklarski sektor (UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 21).
Regional investment aid is also prohibited; see point 27 of the Multisectoral framework on regional aid for large investment projects (OJ C 70 of 19.3.2002, p. 8).
Regionalna pomoč za naložbe je prav tako prepovedana; glej točko 27 Večsektorskega okvira za regionalno pomoč, namenjeno večjim investicijskim projektom (UL C 70, 19.3.2002, str. 8).
Law of 30 October 2002, Legal Gazette No 213 item 1800, amended by the Act of 14 November 2003, Legal Gazette No 229, item 2271.
Zakon z dne 30. oktobra 2002, Uradni list št. 213, točka 1800, spremenjen z zakonom z dne 14. novembra 2003, Uradni list št. 229, točka 2271.
This Act is the basis for several restructuring cases in Poland.
Ta zakon predstavlja osnovo za več primerov prestrukturiranja na Poljskem.
A detailed description of the Act is provided inter alia in the Commission decision of 1 June 2005, cases C(2005) 17 and 18, opening a formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC on restructuring aid for Polish shipyards Gdynia and Gdansk, OJ C 220 of 8.9.2005, p. 7.
Podroben opis zakona je med drugim na voljo v Odločbi Komisije z dne 1. junija 2005, zadeve C(2005) 17 in 18, ki pričenjajo formalni postopek preiskave v skladu s členom 88(2) ES o pomoči za prestrukturiranje za poljske ladjedelnice Gdynia in Gdansk, UL C 220, 8.9.2005, str. 7.
If application of the law varies slightly from one case to another, this is due to the description of the Polish authorities, as it concerns a matter of national law.
Če se uporaba zakona od enega do drugega primera rahlo razlikuje, je to zaradi opisa poljskih oblasti, ker zadeva vprašanje nacionalne zakonodaje.
The following are non-restructurable: pension insurance contributions and those parts of social security contributions which are employee contributions and are connected to salary payments (contributions have two main components which normally make up 50 % each).
Naslednje je neprestrukturljivo: prispevki pokojninskega zavarovanja in tisti deli prispevkov socialnega zavarovanja, ki jih plačujejo zaposleni in so povezani z izplačili plač (prispevki imajo dve glavni sestavini, ki ponavadi znašata vsaka 50 %).
This is because part of the contribution which should be paid by the employee is a liability of the employee (and not the employer), even if the employer has to pay it to ZUS.
To je zaradi tega, ker je del prispevkov, ki jih mora plačati zaposleni, odgovornost zaposlenega (in ne delodajalca), tudi če jih mora zaposleni plačati Skladu za socialno zavarovanje.
Hence the company remains fully liable for employees' contributions.
Zato podjetje ostaja v celoti odgovorno za prispevke zaposlenih.
In addition, if the amounts are overdue they result in statutory interest being charged.
Poleg tega se za zapadle zneske obračunavajo zakonske obresti.
However, this interest, together with the above-mentioned social security contributions paid by the insured party or pension insurance contributions may be deferred for 24 months (Article 32b of the Act of 30.10.2002).
Vendar so lahko te obresti skupaj z zgoraj navedenimi posebnimi prispevki zavarovanja, ki jih plača zavarovana stranka, ali prispevki pokojninskega zavarovanja odloženi za 24 mesecev (člen 32b zakona z dne 30. oktobra 2002).
On 31 March 2004 the OCCP submitted a paper to the Commission indicating why, in its opinion, the restructuring would pass the private creditor test.
marca 2004 je UKVP predložil Komisiji listino, ki navaja, zakaj po njegovem mnenju prestrukturiranje izpolnjuje zahteve preizkusa zasebnih upnikov.
However, the decision still did not comply with all the conditions introduced by the amendments to the Act of 30.10.2002, as it neither contained a detailed description of the public liabilities subject to the special restructuring scheme nor explained why assets would be transferred to the Operator (although that information is contained in the restructuring plan).
Vendar odločba še vedno ni bila v skladu z vsemi pogoji, ki so jih uvedle spremembe zakona z dne 30. oktobra 2002, saj ni vsebovala niti podrobnega opisa javnih obveznosti v skladu s posebno shemo za prestrukturiranje, niti ni razlagala, zakaj naj bodo sredstva prenesena na operaterja (čeprav te podatke vsebuje načrt za prestrukturiranje).
The Polish authorities have stated that this information will be provided in a new version which is scheduled for end-June 2005 and will reflect decisions taken by public institutional creditors.
Poljske oblasti so izjavile, da bodo ti podatki zagotovljeni v novi različici, ki je načrtovana konec junija 2005 in bo odsevala odločitve, ki jih bodo sprejeli javni institucionalni upniki.
The company ATEST ‘Zakład Usług Doradczych i Technicznych’ has been active on the Polish market since 1992 and specialises in valuations of companies, commercial real estate and production assets.
Podjetje ATEST „Zakład Usług Doradczych i Technicznych“ je na poljskem trgu prisotno od leta 1992 in je specializirano za vrednotenja podjetij, komercialnih nepremičnin in proizvodnih sredstev.
It has carried out valuations of a number of companies for the purposes of obtaining debt bank financing, privatisatioon and mergers between companies.
Izvajalo je vrednotenja številnih podjetij za namene pridobitve obveznosti bančnega financiranja, privatizacij in združitev med podjetji.
BRE Corporate Finance S.A. is a 100 % subsidiary of BRE Bank S.A., one of the largest banks in Poland, which is quoted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
BRE Corporate Finance S.A. je 100 % hčerinsko podjetje BRE Bank S.A., ene največjih bank na Poljskem, ki kotira na varšavski borzi.
Management control over BRE Bank is held by Commerzbank AG of Germany, which has over 72 % of the shares.
Nadzor vodstva v BRE Bank izvaja Commerzbank AG iz Nemčije, ki ima v lasti več kot 72 % delnic.
BRE Corporate Finance is involved in investment banking, M&A, restructuring and corporate finance activities.
BRE Corporate Finance je vključena v investicijsko bančništvo M&A, prestrukturiranje in dejavnosti financiranja podjetij.
Poland confirms that the company has been involved in many large privatisation and M&A deals in Poland on behalf of private clients as well as the Treasury.
Poljska potrjuje, da je bilo podjetje vključeno v dosti večjih privatizacij ter M&A na Poljskem sklepa posle v imenu zasebnih strank kot tudi zakladnice.
These projects have usually involved valuations of these companies using various methods.
Ti projekti so navadno vključevali vrednotenja teh podjetij z uporabo različnih metod.
This figure does not include three companies which are not being sold to the strategic investor.
Ta številka ne vključuje treh podjetij, ki niso prodana strateškemu investitorju.
Their value is estimated at between 0 and PLN 15 million.
Njihova vrednost je ocenjena med 0 in 15 milijonov PLN.
This is an estimate taking into amount proceeds as at March 2005 of PLN [...] million (see table 3 below), plus about PLN [...] million of monthly interest until October 2005, plus payment of about PLN [...] million for the receivables of those public creditors that have rejected restructuring.
Ta ocena vključuje prihodke za marec leta 2005 v znesku [...] milijonov PLN (glej tabelo 3), plus približno [...] milijonov PLN mesečnih obresti do oktobra 2005, plus plačilo približno [...] milijonov PLN za terjatve tistih javnih upnikov, ki so zavrnili prestrukturiranje.
Figures are estimates for end-June 2005.
Številke so ocene za konec junija 2005.
PWC's analysis is based on a simulation under the Bankruptcy and Restructuring Act of 28 February 2003.
Analiza PWC temelji na simulaciji v skladu z Zakonom o stečaju in prestrukturiranju z dne 28. februarja 2003.
On the basis of the Environmental Protection Act of 31 January 1980, Legal Gazette 1994/49, item 196.
Na podlagi Zakona za varstvo okolja z dne 31. januarja 1980, Uradni list 1994/49, točka 196.
By Decision No FEO/72752/E/97/TT under Articles 8(1) and 4(1) of the Employment and Rehabilitation (Disabled) Act of 9 May 1991 (Legal Gazette No 46, item 201 with amendments).
Odločba št. FEO/72752/E/97/TT v skladu s členoma 8(1) in 4(1) Zakona o zaposlovanju in rehabilitaciji (invalidov) z dne 9. maja 1991 (Uradni list št. 46, točka 201 s spremembami).
Within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act of 31 January 1980 (Legal Gazette 1994/49, item 196).
V smislu Zakona o varstvu okolja z dne 31. januarja 1980 (Uradni list 1994/49, točka 196).
By Decision of the Province No GKN.IV.7224/653/98 under Article 219(1) of the Real Estate Management Act of 21 August 1997 (Legal Gazette No 115, item 741).
Sklep province št. GKN.IV.7224/653/98 v skladu s členom 219(1) Zakona o upravljanju z nepremičninami z dne 21. avgusta 1997 (Uradni list št. 115, točka 741).
By Decision of the Board of FGSP No 205/99 under Article 4(1) of the Protection of Employees' Claims (Bankrupt Companies) Act of 29 December 1993 (Legal Gazette 1994/1, item 1).
Sklep odbora FGSP št. 205/99 v skladu s členom 4(1) Zakona o varstvu terjatev zaposlenih (podjetja v stečaju) z dne 29. decembra 1993 (Uradni list 1994/1, točka 1).
By Decision of the Head of the Tax Office (No DUS-PP-733/12/99) under Article 67 of the Tax Ordinance of 29 August 1997 (Legal Gazette No 137, item 926 with amendments).
Sklep vodje davčnega urada (št. DUS-E-924/424/99) v skladu s členom 64 Zakona o postopkih izvršbe in upravljanja (Uradni list 1991/36, točka 161).
On the basis of an agreement concerning the restructuring of HCz's debt resulting from non-payment of real estate tax.
Sklep vodje davčnega urada (št. DUS-PP-733/12/99) v skladu s členom 67 davčnega odloka z dne 29. avgusta 1997 (Uradni list št. 137, točka 926 s spremembami).
Under Article 36(1) of the 1999 Budget Act of 17 February 1999 (Legal Gazette 1999/17, item 154).
V skladu s členom 36(1) Zakona o proračunu z dne 17. februarja 2001 (Uradni list 1999/17, točka 154 in 1999/47, točka 466).
By Decision No 2/2000 under Article 67 of the Tax Ordinance of 29 August 1997 (Legal Gazette No 137, item 929 with amendments).
Na podlagi sporazuma glede prestrukturiranja dolga HCz, ki izhaja iz neplačevanja davka na nepremičnine.
Under Article 36(1) of the 2000 Budget Act of 21.01.2000 (Legal Gazette No 7, item 85).
Sklep št. 2/2000 v skladu s členom 67 Davčnega odloka z dne 29. avgusta 1997 (Uradni list št. 137, točka 929 s spremembami).
By Decision No II — 3130/4/01 under Article 67 of the Tax Ordinance of 29 August 1997 (Legal Gazette No 137, item 929 with amendments).
V skladu s členom 36(1) Zakona iz leta 2000 o proračunu z dne 21. januarja 2000 (Uradni list št. 7, točka 85).
Under Article 36(1) of the 2001 Budget Act of 1.3.2001 (Legal Gazette No 21, item 246).
V skladu s členom 36(1) Zakona iz leta 2000 o proračunu z dne 21. januarja 2000 (Uradni list št. 7, točka 85).
Under Article 36(1) of the 2000 Budget Act of 14 March 2002 (Legal Gazette No 30, item 275) and the Restructuring (Iron and Steel Industry) Act of 24 August 2001 (Legal Gazette No 111, item 1196).
Sklep št. II – 3130/4/01 v skladu s členom 67 Davčnega odloka z dne 29. avgusta 1997 (Uradni list št. 137, točka 929 s spremembami).
A State scientific institution which is the main scientific advisory body and is purely state funded.
V skladu s členom 36(1) Zakona iz leta 2000 o proračunu z dne 14. marca 2002 (Uradni list št. 30, točka 275) in Zakona o prestrukturiranju (jeklarske in železarske industrije) z dne 24. avgusta 2001 (Uradni list št. 111, točka 1196).
Of these costs, PLN 3870000 was allotted to industrial research and PLN 4050000 went into pre-competitive development activity.
Od teh stroškov je bilo 606800 PLN dodeljenih industrijskim raziskavam; preostanek je šel za predkonkurenčne razvojne dejavnosti.
All payments from KBN were made to the Institute of Metallurgy.
Znanstvena akademija ima sedaj pravice do gospodarskega izkoriščanja programov R&R.
The results of the research were passed on by the Polish Academy of Science to a number of other industrial plants which face the problem of having to use cooling water from sources containing large amounts of organic substances which damage the heat exchangers.
Državna znanstvena institucija, ki je glavni znanstveni svetovalni organ in jo financira samo država.
The purpose of the project was to develop technology for casting and rolling thick plate steel with a homogenous alloy structure across the whole depth of the plate. These types of steel were required by the shipbuilding industry and had not previously been made in Poland.
Od teh stroškov je bilo 3870000 PLN dodeljenih industrijskim raziskavam, 4050000 PLN pa je šlo za predkonkurenčne razvojne dejavnosti.