natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, a definitive countervailing duty on imports of CD-Rs from India was imposed on 6 June 2003 [4].
Poleg tega je bila 6. junija 2003 uvedena dokončna izravnalna dajatev na uvoz CD-ROM-ov iz Indije [4].
It amounts to 7,3 %.
Dajatev znaša 7,3 %.
The product concerned is recordable compact disks (CD-Rs) originating in the PRC, Hong Kong and Malaysia, which was classifiable in 2005 within CN code ex85239000.
Zadevni izdelek zajema kompaktne diske (CD-ROM-i) s poreklom iz LRK, Hongkonga in Malezije, leta 2005 uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex85239000.
Due to changes in the Combined Nomenclature and as no CD/Rs exists with a recording capacity exceeding 900 megabytes, from 2006 on, the product concerned falls within CN code ex85239010.
Zaradi sprememb kombinirane nomenklature in, ker CD/R-ji s snemalno zmogljivostjo več kot 900 megabajtov od leta 2006 ne obstajajo več, je zadevni izdelek uvrščen pod oznako KN ex85239010.
The product concerned is a polycarbonate disc, which is coated with a layer of dye, a layer of reflective material and a protective layer.
Zadevni izdelek je polikarbonaten disk, prevlečen s slojem barve, odsevnim slojem in zaščitnim slojem.
The disc is an optical storage medium for digital data or sound.
Disk je optični medij za shranjevanje podatkov ali glasbe v digitalni obliki.
CD-Rs can be distinguished according to the type of data stored (data CD-Rs versus music CD-R), the storage capacity, the reflective metal layer and whether or not the CD-Rs are printed upon.
CD-ROM-e se razlikujejo po vrsti shranjenih podatkov (podatkovni CD-ROM-i napram glasbenim CD-ROM-om), zmogljivosti shranjevanja, plasti odsevne kovine in po tem, ali je CD-ROM potiskan.
The investigation has shown that all types of CD-Rs share the same basic physical and technical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse vrste CD-ROM-ov enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti ter osnovno uporabo.
Therefore, they are considered to constitute one single product.
Zato se jih šteje za en sam izdelek.
No differences were found between the product concerned and the CD-Rs produced and sold on the domestic market in the PRC, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Japan, which served as an analogue country, as well as the CD-Rs produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry.
Med zadevnim izdelkom in CD-ROM-i, ki so izdelani in prodani na domačem trgu v LRK, Hongkongu, Maleziji in na Japonskem, ki je predstavljala primerljivo državo, ter CD-ROM-i, ki jih je v Skupnosti izdelala in prodala industrija Skupnosti, ni bilo ugotovljenih razlik.
They were all found to have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Za vse je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske lastnosti in končno uporabo.
It is therefore concluded that all types of CD-Rs form one product and are considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se sklene, da vse vrste CD-ROM-ov predstavljajo en izdelek in se štejejo za podobne v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation established a level of dumping of more than de minimis for each of co-operating exporting producers from the countries concerned.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je stopnja dampinga za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika iz zadevnih držav večja od de minimis.
However, given the conclusions as set out below, it is not necessary to detail these findings.
Vendar pa na podlagi spodnjih sklepov teh ugotovitev ni treba natančno opredeliti.
Community Production
Proizvodnja Skupnosti
In the light of the definition of Community industry as set out in Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, the output of the following Community manufacturers was considered for inclusion in the definition of the Community production at the initiation of the investigation:
V skladu z opredelitvijo industrije Skupnosti, določene v členu 4(1) osnovne uredbe, je bila ob začetku preiskave vključena v opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti štela tudi proizvodnja naslednjih proizvajalcev Skupnosti:
Five complainant Community manufacturers:
pet pritožnikov proizvajalcev Skupnosti:
Two other Community producers who fully cooperated in the investigation, and who supported the proceeding:
dva druga proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki sta v celoti sodelovala v preiskavi in podprla postopek:
Thirteen other manufacturers, as listed in the complaint, to whom questionnaires were sent but none of whom replied to the questionnaire.
trinajst drugih proizvajalcev, navedenih v pritožbi, ki so prejeli vprašalnik, vendar ga niso izpolnili.
Exclusion of Community manufacturers from the definition of Community production for reasons of significant imports during or after the end of the IP
Izvzetje proizvajalcev Skupnosti iz opredelitve proizvajalcev Skupnosti zaradi znatnega uvoza med ali po koncu OP.
Company A
Družba A
In the questionnaire response by company A, it appeared that company A, in addition to its own Community manufacturing, also had imported the product concerned from the countries concerned.
Iz izpolnjenega vprašalnika družbe A, je razvidno, da je poleg lastne proizvodnje v Skupnosti uvažala zadevni izdelek iz zadevnih držav.
The proportion of the imported product sold on the Community market significantly exceeded the volumes of the like product manufactured and sold within the Community.
Delež uvoza, ki je bil prodan na trgu Skupnosti, je znatno presegel delež podobnega izdelka, ki je bil izdelan in prodan v Skupnosti.
It was thereafter considered whether, despite the significant import volumes, the centre of interest for company A still was within the Community and/or whether the imported volumes could be of a temporary nature.
Nato se je proučilo, ali je kljub znatnemu uvozu, središče dejavnosti družbe A še vedno v Skupnosti in/ali je obseg uvoza lahko samo začasne narave.
It appeared that the imports of company A were not of a temporary nature but rather based on a strategic decision to source its production from Original Design Manufacturers (‘ODM’) which are companies that design and manufacture products that are then sold under other brand names.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da uvoz družbe A ni bil začasne narave, pač pa je temeljil na strateški odločitvi družbe, da svojo proizvodnjo utemelji na t. i. „Original Design Manufacturers („ODM“)“, torej na družbah, ki svoje izdelke oblikujejo in proizvajajo, vendar prodajajo pod tujimi blagovnimi znamkami.
It could therefore not be concluded that company A’s centre of interest for the manufacturing of CD-Rs was still within the Community as it appeared likely that company A would continue to import significant volumes of its sales on the Community market from the countries concerned.
Zato ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da je središče dejavnosti družbe A za proizvodnjo CD-ROM-ov še vedno v Skupnosti, saj je verjetno, da bi družba A za svojo prodajo na trgu Skupnosti nadaljevala z znatnim uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
It was also found that, during the IP, company A’s sales on the Community market consisted to a large majority of imported CD-Rs.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so v OP uvoženi CD-ROM-i predstavljali večino prodaje družbe A na trgu Skupnosti.
This casts company A more as an importer than a producer.
To družbo uvršča bolj med uvoznike kot proizvajalce.
It was also noted that company A’s head office and main R&D centre for CD-Rs are located outside the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je glavna uprava družbe A in središče R&R za CD-ROM-e izven Skupnosti.
Thus, it was concluded that company A should not be included in the definition of Community industry and that its production should therefore be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da družba A ne sme biti vključena v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti in, da se njena proizvodnja izvzame iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Furthermore, company A has meanwhile withdrawn its support for the complaint and decided to oppose the imposition of anti-dumping measures on imports from the countries concerned which confirms the above evaluation of company A’s shift of interest.
Poleg tega je družba A v vmesnem času umaknila svojo podporo pritožbi ter se izrekla proti uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz iz zadevnih držav, kar potrjuje zgoraj navedeno oceno spremembe središča interesa družbe A.
Company B
Družba B
In the questionnaire response by company B, it appeared that company B, in addition to its own Community manufacturing, had also imported the product concerned during the period considered.
Iz izpolnjenega vprašalnika družbe B je razvidno, da je v obravnavanem obdobju poleg lastne proizvodnje v Skupnosti zadevni izdelek tudi uvažala.
However, during the IP, these imports have decreased to less than 1 % of its total sales and were therefore deemed insignificant.
Vendar se je uvoz med OP zmanjšal za manj kot 1 % skupne prodaje, zato se zmanjšanje šteje kot nepomembno.
The Commission also received a questionnaire reply from another company (‘B-Rel’) that turned out to have the same mother company (‘company B-corporation’) as company B. Company B-Rel and company B are thus considered related within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation.
Poleg tega je Komisija prejela tudi izpolnjen vprašalnik druge družbe („B-Rel“), za katero se je izkazalo, da ima isto matično družbo („korporacijo družbe B“) kot družba B. Zato se družbo B-Rel in družbo B šteje za povezani, v skladu s členom 4(2) osnovne uredbe.
Being company B-corporation’s distributor of CD-Rs for the retail market in the Community, company B-Rel has purchased all the CD-Rs that are destined for the retail market from company B. In addition, company B-Rel has also imported significant volumes from third countries including the countries concerned.
Kot distributer CD-ROM-ov družbe B za maloprodajni trg v Skupnosti je B-Rel kupila vse CD-ROM-e, ki jih je družba B namenila za maloprodajni trg. Poleg tega je družba B-Rel uvozila znatne količine iz tretjih držav, vključno z zadevnimi državami.
When comparing company B-Rel sales of CD-Rs originating in the countries concerned with those manufactured by company B (which subsequently were either sold directly by company B to business customers or sold via company B-Rel to retailers), it appeared that for company B-corporation the proportion of the imported product sold on the Community market significantly exceeded the volumes of the like product manufactured and sold within the Community.
Primerjava prodaje CR-ROM-ov družbe B-Rel s poreklom iz zadevnih držav in tistih, ki jih je izdelala družba B (in jih nato neposredno prodala poslovnim strankam ali preko družbe B-Rel trgovcem na drobno) je pokazala, da je za korporacijo družbe B delež uvoza izdelka, ki se je prodal na trgu Skupnosti, znatno presegel delež podobnega izdelka, ki je bil izdelan in prodan v Skupnosti.
It was thereafter considered whether, despite the significant import volumes, the centre of interest for company B-corporation was still within the Community and/or whether the imported volumes could be of a temporary nature.
Nato se je proučilo, ali je kljub znatnemu uvozu središče dejavnosti družbe B še vedno v Skupnosti in/ali je obseg uvoza lahko samo začasne narave.
The findings of the investigation indicate that the imports could not be considered as being done only on a temporary basis (as the volume of own manufactured CD-R would not increase considerably in the foreseeable future even taking into account possible extension of the production capacity of company B).
Iz ugotovitev preiskave je mogoče razbrati, da se uvoza ne more šteti za začasnega (saj se obseg lastne proizvodnje CD-ROM-ov v bližnji prihodnosti ne bi znatno povečal, tudi če se upošteva možna širitev proizvodnih zmogljivosti družbe B).
Thus, it appeared likely that company B-corporation would also continue to source major parts of its sales on the Community market from the countries concerned.
Zato se zdi verjetno, da bi korporacija družbe B, velik delež izdelkov, ki bi jih prodala v Skupnosti, pridobila iz zadevnih držav.
It was also noted that company B-corporation’s head office and main R&D centre for CD-Rs are located outside the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je glavna uprava korporacije družbe B in središče R&R za CD-ROM-e izven Skupnosti.
It could therefore not be concluded that company B-corporation’s centre of interest for the manufacturing of CD-Rs is within the Community.
Zato ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da je središče dejavnosti korporacije družbe B za proizvodnjo CD-ROM-ov v Skupnosti.
Thus, it was concluded that company B should not be included in the definition of Community industry and that its production should therefore be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se družbe B ne more vključiti v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti in da se njena proizvodnja zato izvzame iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Company C
Družba C
The Commission received a questionnaire from the Community producer company C as well as from company C-Rel, a distributor of CD-Rs located in Germany.
Komisija je prejela izpolnjen vprašalnik proizvajalca Skupnosti družbe C, ter družbe C-Rel, distributerja CD-ROM-ov s sedežem v Nemčiji.
It appeared that company C and company C-Rel are related within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation, as they have the same owner.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da imata družba C in družba C-Rel istega lastnika in sta tako povezani v skladu s členom 4(2) osnovne uredbe.
During the investigation period, company C-Rel was distributing CD-Rs manufactured by company C. However, after the end of the investigation period, i.e. as from July 2005 onwards, on the basis of supplementary information requested from all Community producers for the period July 2005 to February 2006, company C-Rel has been found to have started to import significant (at a level equivalent to the production of company C in the IP) quantities of CD-Rs from third countries including significant volumes from the countries concerned.
Med obdobjem preiskave je družba C-Rel prodajala in nakupovala CD-ROM-e, ki jih je izdelala družba C. Vendar je bilo na podlagi dodatnih informacij, zahtevanih od vseh proizvajalcev Skupnosti za obdobje od julija 2005 do februarja 2006, ugotovljeno, da je družba C-Rel po koncu obdobja preiskave, tj. od julija 2005 naprej, začela uvažati znatne količine (na ravni, ki je enaka proizvodnji družb C v OP) CD-ROM-ov iz tretjih držav, vključno z znatnim obsegom iz zadevnih držav.
In order to verify whether these imports were of a temporary nature, the Commission sent an additional request for supplementary information, this time for the period March 2006 to May 2006.
Komisija je, da bi preverila, ali je zadevni uvoz začasne narave, zahtevala dodatne podatke, tokrat za obdobje od marca 2006 do maja 2006.
On this basis, as significant volumes of imports continued, it had to be concluded that these imports were not of a temporary nature, but rather a strategic decision to source significant parts of its future sales from imports.
Na podlagi tega je, ker je obseg uvoza ostal enak, treba skleniti, da zadevni uvoz ni začasne narave, ampak strateška odločitev, da se v prihodnje znaten del izdelkov za prodajo uvozi.
In accordance with the principles presented above and applied vis-à-vis companies A and B and given that company C-Rel/company C will be shielded from the effects of any dumped imports in the future, it was concluded that company C should not be included in the definition of the Community production.
V skladu z načeli, predstavljenimi zgoraj in uporabljenimi v zvezi z družbama A in B, ter ob dejstvu, da bo družba C-Rel/družba C v prihodnosti zavarovana pred vplivi dampinškega uvoza, je bilo sklenjeno, da družba C ne sme biti vključena v opredelitev proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Exclusion of Community manufacturers from the definition of Community production for reasons of cessation of production during or after the end of the IP
Izvzetje proizvajalcev Skupnosti iz opredelitve proizvajalcev Skupnosti zaradi prenehanja proizvodnje med ali po koncu OP.
Company D
Družba D
After the end of the IP, the complainant Community producer company D filed for liquidation.
Po in med OP je pritožnik proizvajalec Skupnosti družba D začela postopek likvidacije.
Several parties argued that, pursuant to Community practice, company D should be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Več strank je trdilo, da je treba v skladu s prakso Skupnosti družbo D izvzeti iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti.
In January 2006, the liquidator announced its intention to sell all the assets of company D, including all of its production lines.
Likvidacijski upravitelj je januarja 2006 objavil, da namerava prodati vsa sredstva družbe D, vključno z njenimi proizvodnimi linijami.
The complainant subsequently informed the Commission that a subsidiary of company D, the complainant Community producer company E, would acquire the production lines of its parent company and would re-install them and utilize them for continuous CD-Rs production at the premises of company E. For this purpose, company E would be re-capitalized and be sold to an external party.
Pritožnik je nato obvestil Komisijo, da namerava odvisna družba družbe D, pritožnik proizvajalec Skupnosti družba E, pridobiti proizvodne linije svoje nadrejene družbe, ter jih v svojih prostorih ponovno namestiti ter uporabiti za nadaljevanje proizvodnje CD-ROM-ov, v ta namen bi bila družba E dokapitalizirana in prodana zunanji stranki.
Thus, at the time of the Interim Report, it could not be concluded that company D should be excluded from the definition of Community production as the production lines allegedly were to be reinstalled and re-utilized at the premises of its Community subsidiary, company E.
Zato v času vmesnega poročila ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da je treba družbo D izvzeti iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti, saj naj bi se proizvodne linije verjetno ponovno namestile in uporabile v prostorih njene odvisne družbe v Skupnosti, družbe E.
However, on the basis of supplementary information requested from Community producers for the period July 2005 to May 2006 (i.e. after the IP), this supplementary information showed that production lines indeed had not been reinstalled as production and capacity were in line with those before the acquisition of production lines.
Vendar je bila na podlagi zahtevanih dodatnih informacij za obdobje od julija 2005 do maja 2006 (tj. po OP) ugotovljeno, da proizvodne linije dejansko niso bile ponovno nameščene, saj sta proizvodnja in zmogljivost ustrezali tistima, pred nakupom proizvodnih linij.
Furthermore, no valid business plan had been presented to the Commission’s services that demonstrated that company D’s production lines were being installed at the premises of company E.
Poleg tega ni bil službam Komisije predložen noben veljaven poslovni načrt, ki bi dokazal, da so bile proizvodne linije nameščene v prostorih družbe E.
It is Community practice that manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of Community industry within the meaning of Article 4 of the basic Regulation.
Praksa Skupnosti je, da proizvajalci, ki so dokončno prenehali s svojo proizvodnjo med ali po OP, ne morejo biti vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti v skladu s členom 4 osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, company D’s production should be excluded from the definition of the Community production as company D’s production lines closed definitely after the end of IP and it has not been demonstrated that these production lines are again being utilized.
Zato je treba proizvodnjo družbe D izvzeti iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti, saj so proizvodne linije družbe D ostale dokončno zaprte po koncu OP in ni dokazov, da bodo začele ponovno obratovati.
CDA & BOC SA
CDA & BOC SA
Subsequent to the publication of the notice of initiation, two further companies, CDA and BOC SA, informed the Commission that they had ceased their production within the Community for the foreseeable future.
Po objavi obvestila o začetku sta še dve družbi CDA in BOC SA obvestili Komisijo, da sta v bližnji prihodnosti prenehali s proizvodnjo v Skupnosti.
Consequently, CDA and BOC SA were excluded from the definition of the Community industry and their production was excluded from the definition of Community production.
Zato sta bili družbi CDA in BOC SA izvzeti iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti, njuna proizvodnja pa iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Other Community producers
Ostali proizvajalci Skupnosti
The complainant had provided a list of 13 other producers in the Community.
Pritožnik je predložil seznam trinajstih drugih proizvajalcev v Skupnosti.
With the exception of BOC SA, none of these producers have co-operated during the investigation.
Z izjemo družbe BOC SA ni nihče od teh proizvajalcev sodeloval v preiskavi.
Nevertheless, they should be accounted for when defining Community production.
Kljub temu jih je treba pri opredelitvi proizvodnje Skupnosti upoštevati.
On the basis of information in the complaint, the production of these companies has been estimated to be around 264 Mio Units (for calendar year 2004).
Na podlagi informacij pritožnika je bila proizvodnja teh družb ocenjena na približno 264 milijonov enot (za koledarsko leto 2004).
Recent information by the complainant suggests that at least four of those other Community producers ceased their production during or after the end of the IP.
Iz nedavnih informacij pritožnika je razvidno, da so vsaj štirje od navedenih ostalih proizvajalcev Skupnosti med ali po OP prenehali s proizvodnjo.
As stated above, manufacturers that definitively cease their production during or after the end of the IP should not be included in the definition of the Community industry.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, se proizvajalcev, ki so dokončno prenehali s svojo proizvodnjo med ali po OP, ne sme vključiti v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti.
Consequently, also the production of these four companies should be excluded from the definition of Community production.
Zato je treba iz opredelitve proizvodnje Skupnosti izvzeti tudi zadevne štiri družbe.
To conclude, Community production of CD-Rs within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation has been defined as:
Sklene se, da se proizvodnja CD-ROM-ov Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe, opredeli kot:
CD-Rs produced by the original 20 companies listed in recital (28), minus
CD-ROM-i, ki jih proizvaja prvotnih 20 družb, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (28), razen
the CD-Rs produced by the three companies which, as described in recitals (29) to (44) , have been excluded for reasons of imports, and
CD-ROM-ov, ki jih proizvajajo tri družbe, ki so, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (29) do (44), izvzete zaradi uvoza; in
the output of the three cooperating companies which, as described in recitals (45) to (51) have been excluded as their production within the Community ceased,
proizvodnje treh sodelujočih družb, ki so bile, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (45) do (51), izvzete zaradi prenehanja proizvodnje v Skupnosti;
the output of the four non-cooperating companies which, as described in recitals (52) to (55) have been excluded as their production within the Community ceased.
proizvodnje štirih nesodelujočih družb, ki so bile, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (52) do (55), izvzete zaradi prenehanja proizvodnje v Skupnosti.
The total production of those remaining 10 producers, which constitute Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, has been estimated to be 168 Mio units during the IP.
Skupna proizvodnja preostalih desetih proizvajalcev, ki sestavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe, je bila med OP ocenjena na 168 milijonov enot.
Definition of Community Industry
Opredelitev industrije Skupnosti
It follows from recital (57) above that Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation was constituted by the 10 producers whose collective output was estimated to 168 Mio Units.
Iz uvodne izjave (57) zgoraj je razvidno, da je proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe, sestavljalo deset proizvajalcev, katerih skupna proizvodnja je bila ocenjena na 168 milijonov enot.