natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission moreover considers that the costs for the demolition of the building that were incurred in 2005 (point 11) are not eligible as this demolition is not part of the investment project to modernise and rationalise the production process.
Po mnenju Komisije do podpore prav tako niso upravičeni leta 2005 nastali stroški za rušenje stavbe (točka 11), saj to rušenje ni del naložbenega projekta za posodobitev in racionalizacijo proizvodnega postopka.
Instead it is related to the normal activities of Magog and as such does not fulfil the definition of an investment in tangible and intangible assets under Regulation (EC) No 70/2001.
Nasprotno, rušenje je del običajnega poslovanja podjetja Magog in kot tako ne ustreza opredelitvi naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva Uredbe (ES) št. 70/2001.
As regards the remaining part of the architect's fee (point 12) not linked to ‘hall 2005’, the Commission considers that this measure is not part of the investment project either as these fees are not linked to any investments that are considered to be part of the modernisation and rationalisation project.
Tudi preostali del honorarja za arhitekta (točka 12), ki ni povezan s „halo 2005“, po mnenju Komisije ni del naložbenega projekta, saj ta honorar ni povezan z naložbami, ki so del projekta posodobitve in racionalizacije.
The Commission considers that none of the other Community guidelines and regulations, such as those for rescue and restructuring aid, for environmental aid, for training aid, for employment aid, or for risk capital, could apply to the case.
Komisija je mnenja, da se v tem primeru ne uporabljajo druge smernice ali uredbe Skupnosti, ki se na primer nanašajo na pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, pomoč za varstvo okolja, za usposabljanje ter za zaposlovanje ali tvegani kapital.
The Commission also investigated the compatibility of the aid with the common interest in general and in particular with the objective of the protection of workers' health and safety, as set out in Article 137 of the Treaty.
Komisija je tudi preverila, ali je pomoč združljiva s skupnim interesom in zlasti s ciljem varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev v smislu člena 137 Pogodbe ES.
Article 137 of the Treaty provides that the Community will support and complement the activities of the Member States inter alia in the following fields: (a) improvement in particular of the working environment to protect workers' health and safety and (b) working conditions.
V skladu s členom 137 Pogodbe ES Skupnost podpira in dopolnjuje dejavnost držav članic med drugim na področju (a) izboljševanja zlasti delovnega okolja z namenom varovanja zdravja in varnosti delavcev ter na področju (b) delovnih razmer.
The Commission comes to the conclusion that the aid cannot be considered compatible on this basis as the primary objective of the aid was not the improvement of the working environment to protect worker's health and safety but the rationalisation and modernisation of the production process of Magog.
Komisija je sklenila, da pomoči na tej podlagi ni mogoče označiti kot združljive s skupnim trgom, ker v prvi vrsti ne služi izboljšanju delovnega okolja za varovanje zdravja in varnosti delavcev, temveč racionalizaciji in posodobitvi proizvodnega postopka podjetja Magog.
The fact that the project (as a side effect) also contributed to an improvement of the working conditions of the employees as it reduced manual work and noise at the work place does not invalidate this conclusion.
Dejstvo, da je projekt (kot stranski učinek) prispeval tudi k izboljšanju delovnih pogojev za delavce in zmanjšal količino ročnega dela ter hrup na delovnem mestu, tega sklepa ne izpodbija.
The remaining amount of EUR 285410 is incompatible with the common market and has to be recovered,
Preostali znesek v višini 285410 EUR s skupnim trgom ni združljiv in ga je treba vrniti –
The state aid amounting to EUR 416683 which Germany has implemented for Schiefergruben Magog GmbH & Co. KG is compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Državna pomoč v višini 416683 EUR, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila za Schiefergruben Magog GmbH & Co. KG, je v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The state aid amounting to EUR 285410 which Germany has implemented for Schiefergruben Magog GmbH & Co. KG is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 285410 EUR, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila za Schiefergruben Magog GmbH & Co. KG, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the recipient the aid referred to in Article 2 and unlawfully made available to the recipient.
Nemčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da prejemnik vrne v členu 2 navedeno nezakonito dodeljeno pomoč.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the Decision.
Izterjava se izvrši nemudoma v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, pod pogojem, da le-ti omogočajo takojšnjo izvršitev Odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the recipient's until the date of its recovery.
Pomoč, ki se vrne, vključuje obresti od datuma, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč dodeljena prejemniku(om), do datuma vračila pomoči.
The interest to be recovered under paragraph 2 shall be calculated in accordance with the procedure laid down in Articles 9 and 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Obresti, ki jih je treba plačati po odstavku 2, se obračunajo v skladu s členoma 9 in 11 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months of notification of this Decision Germany shall formerly request the aid recipient referred to in Article 2 to reimburse the unlawful and incompatible aid and the interest due.
Nemčija prejemnika pomoči, navedenega v členu 2, v roku dveh mesecev po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi uradno pozove, naj vrne nezakonito in s skupnim trgom nezdružljivo pomoč skupaj s pripadajočimi obrestmi.
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Nemčija v roku dveh mesecev po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti za izpolnjevanje te odločbe.
It will provide this information using the questionnaire attached in Annex 1 to this Decision.
V ta namen uporabi vprašalnik v prilogi te odločbe.
OJ C 282, 19.11.2004, p. 3.
UL C 282. 19.11.2004, str. 3.
Figures do not add up because of rounding.
Zaradi zaokroževanja se vsota ne ujema.
The figures do not fully add up because of rounding.
Zaradi zaokroževanja se vsota ne ujema.
OJ L 140, 30.11.2004, p. 1.
UL L 140,30.11.2004, str. 1.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMISSION DECISION C(2006) 641
PODATKI O IZVAJANJU ODLOČBE KOMISIJE C(2006) 641
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful state aid that has been put at the disposal of the recipient:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje podatke o znesku nezakonite državne pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena prejemniku
Date(s) of payment [1]
Datum(i) izplačila [1]
Identity of recipient
Podatki o prejemniku
Please explain in detail how the interest payable on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated.
Prosimo, natančno pojasnite, kako se obračunavajo obresti za terjani znesek pomoči.
Measures planned and already taken to recover the aid
Načrtovani in že sprejeti ukrepi za izterjavo pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures are planned and what measures have already been taken to bring about the immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, natančno opišite, kateri ukrepi so načrtovani in kateri so že bili sprejeti za izvršitev takojšnje in učinkovite izterjave pomoči.
Please also explain what alternative measures are available in national law to bring about recovery?
Prosimo, pojasnite tudi, kateri nadomestni ukrepi za izvedbo terjatve obstajajo v nacionalni zakonodaji.
Please also indicate, where relevant, the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Kjer je to primerno, navedite tudi pravno podlago za sprejete/načrtovane ukrepe.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Kdaj bo postopek izterjave pomoči zaključen?
Recovery already effected
Že plačane terjatve
Please provide the following details on the amounts of aid that have been recovered from the recipient:
Prosimo, navedite naslednje podatke o zneskih pomoči, ki jih je prejemnik že vrnil:
Amount of aid repaid
Vrnjen znesek pomoči
Identify of recipient
Podatki o prejemniku
Please attach proof of repayment of the aid amounts specified in the table under point 3.1 above.
Prosimo, priložite dokazila o vračilu zneskov pomoči, navedenih v tabeli pod točko 3.1.
(°) Date(s) on which the aid or individual instalments of aid were put at the disposal of the recipient if the measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements, use separate rows)
Datum(i), ko je bila pomoč (ali posamezne tranše) dodeljena prejemniku (če ukrep vključuje več tranš, uporabite ločene vrstice)
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the recipient (in gross aid equivalent)
Znesek, ki je bil dodeljen prejemniku (v bruto ekvivalentih pomoči)
(°) Date(s) on which the aid was repaid
Datum(i), ko je bila pomoč vrnjena
Comments were submitted by letter dated 14 December 2004, registered as received on 16 December 2004, from Rathscheck Schiefer und Dach-Systeme KG, I.B.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 14. decembra 2004, evidentiranim 16. decembra 2004, prejela pripombe podjetij Rathscheck Schiefer und Dach-Systeme KG, I.B.
Rathscheck Söhne KG Moselschiefer-Bergwerke and Theis-Böger GmbH (‘Rathscheck and Theis-Böger’) and by letter dated 7 December 2004, registered as received on 13 December 2004, from a third party that wished to remain anonymous.
Rathscheck Söhne KG Moselschiefer-Bergwerke in Theis-Böger GmbH (v nadaljevanju „Rathscheck in Theis-Böger“) in z dopisom z dne 7. decembra 2004, evidentiranim 13. decembra 2004, pripombe tretje stranke, ki je želela ostati neimenovana.
The second stage foresaw the construction of a hall, which was to be followed by the implementation of the new technology as a third stage.
Druga faza je predvidevala zgraditev hale, v tretji fazi pa naj bi bila vpeljana nova tehnologija.
According to the application, the project ‘development and testing of digitally controlled and robot-supported roofing slate production’ consisted of three stages.
V skladu s prošnjo je bil celoten projekt „Razvoj in preizkušanje digitalno krmiljenega in z roboti podprtega pridobivanja strešnega skrilavca“ razdeljen na tri faze.
In a first stage a prototype was to be developed.
V prvi fazi je bil predviden razvoj prototipa.
On the basis of the above the Commission comes to the conclusion that the total eligible costs for investments in tangible and intangible assets under Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 are EUR 733970 for stage 1 and EUR 522859 for stages 2 and 3.
Komisija je končno sklenila, da znašajo po Uredbi (ES) št. 70/2001 do podpore upravičeni stroški za naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva 733970 EUR za prvo fazo in 522859 EUR za drugo in tretjo fazo.
The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully granted aid amounting to EUR 702093 to Magog in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty. The Commission considers that an amount of EUR 416683 can be considered compatible with the common market under Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 (EUR 228158 for R&D and EUR 188524 for investment in tangible and intangible assets.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Nemčija podjetju Magog v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES nezakonito dodelila pomoči v višini 702093 EUR. Po mnenju Komisije je mogoče znesek v višini 416683 EUR (228158 EUR za R&R in 188524 EUR za naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva) po Uredbi (ES) št. 70/2001 označiti kot združljivega s skupnim trgom.
They thus amount to EUR 1256829 in total. As the allowable aid intensity is 15 % for small enterprises, this results in an allowable aid amount of EUR 188524 for investments in tangible and intangible assets.
Skupaj tako znašajo 1256829 EUR. Ker je dovoljena intenzivnost pomoči za majhna podjetja 15 %, znaša dovoljeni znesek pomoči za naložbe v opredmetena in neopredmetena sredstva 188524 EUR.
on State Aid — France — Aid to rescue and restructure the Air Lib company
o državni pomoči – Francija – pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje družbe Air Lib
(notified under document number C(2006) 649)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 649)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above,
ob pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi določbami in ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
By letter of 22 January 2002 France notified the European Commission of aid to rescue the airline parent holding company AOM Air Liberté (hereinafter referred to as ‘Air Lib’ or ‘the company’).
V dopisu z dne 22. januarja 2002 je Francija obvestila Evropsko komisijo o pomoči za reševanje krovne letalske holdinške družbe AOM Air Liberté (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Air Lib“ ali „podjetje“).
Having been implemented unlawfully, before its approval by the Commission, this measure was registered as non-notified aid under number NN 42/2002.
Ker se je pomoč izvajala nezakonito, tj. preden jo je odobrila Komisija, je bil ukrep evidentiran kot nepriglašena pomoč pod št. NN 42/2002.
By letter of 24 January 2003 (SG (2003) D/228222), the Commission informed France of its decision to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of this aid.
V dopisu z dne 24. januarja 2003 (SG (2003) D/228222) je Komisija obvestila Francijo o svoji odločitvi, da bo glede te pomoči sprožila postopek po členu 88(2) Pogodbe.
The Commission decision initiating the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
Odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission invited interested parties to comment on the aid in question within one month of the date of publication, i.e. by 11 May 2003.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, da svoje pripombe predložijo najpozneje en mesec po objavi, tj. do 11. maja 2003.
The Commission has received comments on this subject from one interested party by letters of 9 and 12 May 2003.
Komisija je prejela pripombe ene zainteresirane stranke v dopisih z dne 9. in 12. maja 2003.
Following the Commission's request made on 21 May, this third party agreed to waive the confidentiality of its comments.
Na zahtevo Komisije z dne 21. maja se je tretja oseba odrekla zaupnosti svojih pripomb.
The comments were therefore conveyed to France by letter of 23 June 2003 and France was given one month to respond.
Te so bile zato posredovane Franciji v dopisu z dne 23. junija 2003, Francija pa je dobila mesec dni časa, da predloži svoj odgovor.
At the same time, France responded to the initiation of the procedure by letter of 19 May 2003.
Istočasno je Francija z dopisom z dne 19. maja 2003 odgovorila na obvestilo o sprožitvi postopka.
Context
Ozadje
Following the decision by their former shareholders, and particularly Swissair, to no longer continue their investment strategy, and confronted with a lack of new investors, the companies Air Liberté AOM (formerly AOM Minerve), Air Liberté and five subsidiary companies were subject to compulsory administration proceedings by the Créteil Commercial Court on 19 June 2001.
Po odločitvi bivših delničarjev, zlasti družbe Swissair, da ne bodo več izvajali strategije naložb, in zaradi pomanjkanja novih investitorjev je 19. junija 2001 gospodarsko sodišče v Créteilu sprožilo stečajni postopek proti družbama Air Liberté AOM (prej AOM Minerve) in Air Liberté ter petim hčerinskim družbam.
On 27 July 2001, the Court handed over the assets of the administered companies for one symbolic franc to the Holco company, then to any subsidiary which it controlled.
Sodišče je 27. julija za simbolični znesek enega franka predalo sredstva družb v stečaju družbi Holco, tj. kateri koli hčerinski družbi, ki jo ta nadzira.
Air Lib (the trade name of the parent holding company AOM Air Liberté SA), a subsidiary of Holco SAS, itself owned almost 100 % by Mr Corbet, was constituted to this effect on 24 August 2001.
Air Lib (trgovsko ime krovne holdinške družbe AOM Air Liberté SA), hčerinska družba družbe Holco SAS, ki je v skoraj 100-odstotni lasti gospoda Corbeta, je bila zato ustanovljena 24. avgusta 2001.
On 1 August 2001, the Court also endorsed the principle of the transaction proposed by the former shareholders through which Swissair undertook to pay FRF 1,5 billion (i.e. €228,7 million).
Sodišče je 1. avgusta 2001 tudi odobrilo načelo transakcije, ki so jo predlagali nekdanji delničarji, po kateri naj bi družba Swissair plačala 1,5 milijarde FRF (tj. 228,7 milijone EUR).
By the beginning of September 2001, before its own bankruptcy, Swissair had in fact paid over only FRF 1050 million (or €160 million).
Do začetka septembra 2001 je družba Swissair še pred lastnim stečajem plačala le 1050 milijonov FRF (160 milijonov EUR).
This aid would have covered only a part of the company's short-term requirements.
Ta pomoč bi pokrila le del kratkoročnih potreb družbe.
In the absence of any notification of a plan to restructure the company or proof that the loan had been reimbursed, the Commission pointed out to France on 9 July 2002 that it was pursuing its analysis of this dossier from the angle of an aid for restructuring that had been granted unlawfully.
Ker Komisija ni prejela ne uradnega obvestila o načrtu za prenovo družbe ne potrdilo, da je posojilo treba vrniti, je 9. julija 2002 Franciji sporočila, da analizo dokumentacije izvaja s stališča nezakonito dodeljene pomoči za prenovo.
In its comments to the Commission, the interested party, the French airline SA Corse Air International (hereinafter referred to as ‘Corsair’) basically transmitted legal documents showing the action it had taken before the French courts.
V svojih pripombah, posredovanih Komisiji, je zainteresirana stranka, francoski letalski prevoznik SA Corse Air International (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Corsair“), predložila pravne listine, ki so dokazovale, da je na francoskem sodišču sprožila pravni spor.
At the beginning of 2003, Corsair had summoned Air Lib to appear before the Créteil Commercial Court because of the unlawful aid from which Air Lib had benefited according to Corsair, demanding that the aid be paid back and asking the Court to order the cessation of the abovementioned commercial activities which Corsair deemed to be unfair practices resulting from the said unlawful aid.
Na začetku leta 2003 je družba Corsair dosegla, da se družba Air Lib pojavi na gospodarskem sodišču v Créteilu zaradi nezakonite pomoči, ki naj bi jo po mnenju družbe Corsair prejemala; družba Corsair je zahtevala, da se pomoč vrne, in od sodišča zahtevala, da odredi prekinitev tovrstnih gospodarskih dejavnosti, ki so bile po mnenju družbe Corsair nepoštene in so izhajale iz navedene nezakonite pomoči.
By a ruling of 12 February 2003, the Court, having regard inter alia to the procedure initiated by the Commission, declared that it had no jurisdiction in this matter.
Sodišče je 12. februarja 2003 odločilo, da ni pristojno za to zadevo, ker je v zvezi z njo sprožila postopek tudi Komisija.
By submitting information, Corsair had hoped that the Commission would formulate the opinion that the decision of the Court was in conflict with its own decision-making practice and with Community case law.
S posredovanjem podatkov je družba Corsair upala, da bo Komisija v svojem mnenju izrazila stališče, da je navedeno sodišče ravnalo v nasprotju z lastno prakso in s sodno prakso Skupnosti.
Corsair had also adduced arguments in support of the criticism levelled by the Commission at the initial State aid, the company's commercial development and the other fiscal and social support measures from which the company was alleged to have benefited.
Družba Corsair je navedla tudi argumente v prid kritike, ki jo je izrazila Komisija glede začetne državne pomoči, gospodarskega razvoja družbe ter drugih podpornih ukrepov v zvezi z davki in socialnimi prispevki, od katerih naj bi družba imela koristi.
COMMENTS BY FRANCE
PRIPOMBE FRANCIJE
On 19 May 2003 the French authorities informed the Commission that, following the failure of IMCA's bid to take over Air Lib, they had decided on 5 February 2003 not to renew Air Lib's temporary operating permit which expired on that date.
Francoski organi so 19. maja 2003 obvestili Komisijo, da so se po neuspehu ponudbe skupine IMCA za prevzem družbe Air Lib 5. februarja 2003 odločili, da družbi Air Lib ne podaljšajo začasnega dovoljenja za poslovanje, ki je poteklo na ta dan.
Consequently, faced with serious financial difficulties, Air Lib filed for bankruptcy with the Créteil Commercial Court on 13 February 2003 and the Court ruled on 17 February that the company should be wound up; this ruling was upheld on appeal on 4 April.
Posledično je družba Air Lib 13. februarja 2003 na gospodarskem sodišču v Créteilu zaradi hudih finančnih težav vložila zahtevo za uvedbo stečajnega postopka, sodišče pa se je 17. februarja izreklo, da mora družba v stečaj; odločitev sodišča je ostala v veljavi kljub pritožbi z dne 4. aprila.
As there appeared to be no way of resuming the company's activity, the coordinator of the airports of Paris in the meantime reallocated the slots, totalling about 35000 , that had thus become available.
Ker je bilo videti, da ni možnosti za obnovitev poslovanja družbe, je koordinator pariških letališč prerazporedil približno 35000 slotov, ki so s stečajem postali razpoložljivi.
Accordingly, France has pointed out that in its opinion the formal investigation procedure initiated on 21 January 2003 was now no longer relevant as court-ordered liquidation is one of the grounds for ending entitlement to State rescue aid provided for in the Community guidelines.
V skladu s tem je Francija poudarila, da po njenem mnenju formalni postopek preiskave, sprožen 21. januarja 2003, ni več relevanten, ker je likvidacija, ki jo je odredilo sodišče, podlaga za izgubo upravičenja do državne pomoči za reševanje, kot to določajo smernice Skupnosti.
V. CONCLUSIONS
SKLEP
The Commission notes that the activities of the beneficiary of the aid came to an end without its activities being taken over by any third party in the course of legal proceedings or any other procedure.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je prejemnik pomoči prenehal poslovati in da slednjega ni prevzela tretja oseba ne s sodnim postopkom ne s kakršnim koli drugim postopkom.
Consequently, this ended all potential distortion of competition resulting from the measure implemented by the French authorities for the benefit of Air Lib.
S tem se je končalo tudi vsakršno morebitno izkrivljanje konkurence, ki bi bilo posledica ukrepa francoskih organov v korist družbe Air Lib.
Moreover, the Commission recalls that paragraph 23d of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty, published in 1999, provides that the liquidation of a company is one of the grounds for terminating rescue aid.
Poleg tega Komisija opozarja, da odstavek 23(d) Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah določa, da je likvidacija družbe ena od podlag za ustavitev pomoči za reševanje.
In view of the above, the formal investigation procedure initiated on 21 January 2003 pursuant to Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty has become devoid of purpose,
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je formalni postopek preiskave, sprožen 21. januarja 2003 na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES, izgubil svoj namen –
The procedure of Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty initiated on 21 January 2003 against the holding company AOM Air Liberté, known as ‘Air Lib’, shall be terminated.
Postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES, sprožen 21. januarja 2003 proti holdinški družbi AOM Air Liberté, znani kot „Air Lib“, se ustavi.
Done at Brussels, 8 March 2006.
V Bruslju, 8. marca 2006.
Decision of 21 January 2003 published in OJ C 88, 11.4.2003, p. 11.
Odločitev z dne 21. januarja 2003, objavljena v UL C 88, 11.4.2003, str. 11.
See footnote on page 1.
Glej opombo 1.