natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Fault code(s) associated with a failure of the emission control monitoring system shall not be capable of being cleared from the system memory by any scan tool.
Vsem pregledovalnikom mora biti onemogočeno brisanje kod(-e) okvare v zvezi z okvaro sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij.
In the case of the removal or deactivation of elements of the emission control monitoring system, in accordance with section 6.5.7.1, a non-erasable fault code shall be stored in accordance with section 3.9.2 of Annex IV to Directive 2005/78/EC for a minimum of 400 days or 9600 hours of engine operation.
V primeru odstranitve ali deaktiviranja elementov sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij v skladu s točko 6.5.7.1 se neizbrisna koda okvare v skladu s točko 3.9.2 Priloge IV k Direktivi 2005/78/ES shrani za najmanj 400 dni ali 9600 ur delovanja motorja.
Demonstration of the emission control monitoring system
Prikaz delovanja sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij
As part of the application for type-approval provided for in section 3, the manufacturer shall demonstrate the conformity of the provisions of this section by tests on an engine dynamometer in accordance with sections 6.5.8.2 to 6.5.8.7.
Kot del vloge za homologacijo, kot je predvideno v poglavju 3, proizvajalec dokaže skladnost s predpisi iz tega poglavja s preskusi na dinamometru motorja, v skladu s točkami 6.5.8.2 do 6.5.8.7.
The compliance of an engine family or an OBD engine family to the requirements of this section may be demonstrated by testing the emission control monitoring system of one of the members of the family (the parent engine), provided the manufacturer demonstrates to the type approval authority that the emission control monitoring systems are similar within the family.
Skladnost celotne družine motorjev ali družine motorjev OBD z zahtevami iz tega poglavja se dokaže s preskušanjem sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij za enega od članov družine (starševski motor), če proizvajalec dokaže homologacijskemu organu, da so si sistemi za spremljanje nadzora emisij v družini podobni.
This demonstration may be performed by presenting to the type-approval authorities such elements as algorithms, functional analyses, etc.
Ta dokaz se lahko izvede s predstavitvijo elementov, kot so algoritmi, funkcionalne analize ipd., homologacijskim organom.
The parent engine is selected by the manufacturer in agreement with the type approval authority.
Starševski motor izbere proizvajalec v soglasju s homologacijskim organom.
The testing of the emission control monitoring system consists of the following three phases:
Preskušanje sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij sestavljajo naslednje tri faze:
Selection:
Izbira:
An incorrect operation of the NOx control measures or a failure of the emission control monitoring system is selected by the authority within a list of incorrect operations provided by the manufacturer.
Organ s seznama nepravilnega delovanja, ki ga predloži proizvajalec, izbere nepravilno delovanje nadzornih ukrepov za NOx ali okvaro sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij.
Qualification:
Kvalificiranje:
The influence of the incorrect operation is validated by measuring the NOx level over the ETC on an engine test bed.
Vpliv nepravilnega delovanja se na preskuševališču motorja preveri z merjenjem ravni NOx z ETC.
Demonstration:
Dokazovanje:
The reaction of the system (torque reduction, warning signal, etc.) shall be demonstrated by running the engine on four OBD test cycles.
Odziv sistema (zmanjšanje navora, opozorilni signal itd.) se dokaže s tekom motorja v štirih preskusnih ciklusih OBD.
For the selection phase, the manufacturer shall provide the type approval authority with a description of the monitoring strategies used to determine potential incorrect operation of any NOx control measure and potential failures in the emission control monitoring system that would lead either to activation of the torque limiter or to activation of the warning signal only.
Za fazo izbiranja proizvajalec predloži homologacijskemu organu opis strategij spremljanja, uporabljenih za določitev potencialno nepravilnega delovanja nadzornih ukrepov za NOx in potencialnih okvar sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij, ki lahko privedejo do sproženja omejevalnika navora ali samo sproženja opozorilnega signala.
Typical examples of incorrect operations for this list are an empty reagent tank, an incorrect operation leading to an interruption of reagent dosing activity, an insufficient reagent quality, an incorrect operation leading to low reagent consumption, an incorrect EGR flow or a deactivation of the EGR.
Značilni primeri nepravilnega delovanja za ta seznam so prazna posoda z reagentom, nepravilno delovanje, ki privede do prekinitve doziranja reagenta, neustrezna kakovost reagenta, nepravilno delovanje, ki privede do nizke porabe reagenta, nepravilni pretok EGR ali deaktiviranje EGR.
A minimum of two and a maximum of three incorrect operations of the NOx control system or failures of the emission control monitoring system shall be selected by the type approval authority from this list.
Homologacijski organ s tega seznama izbere najmanj dva in največ tri nepravilna delovanja sistema za nadzor NOx ali napake sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij.
For the qualification phase, the NOx emissions shall be measured over the ETC test cycle, according to the provisions of Appendix 2 to Annex III.
Za fazo kvalificiranja se merijo emisije NOx v preskusnem ciklusu ETC v skladu z določbami iz Dodatka 2 Priloge III.
The result of the ETC test shall be used to determine in which way the NOx control monitoring system is expected to react during the demonstration process (torque reduction and/or warning signal).
Rezultat preskusa ETC se uporablja za določanje predvidenega delovanja sistema za nadzor NOx med postopkom dokazovanja (zmanjšanje navora in/ali opozorilni signal).
The failure shall be simulated in a way that the NOx level does not exceed by more than 1 g/kWh any of the threshold levels given in sections 6.5.3.2 or 6.5.3.4.
Simulira se okvara, tako da raven NOx ne preseže nobene izmed mejnih vrednosti iz točke 6.5.3.2 ali 6.5.3.4 za več kot 1 g/kWh.
Emissions qualification is not required in case of an empty reagent tank or for demonstrating a failure of the emission control monitoring system.
Kvalificiranje emisij se ne zahteva v primeru prazne posode za reagent ali za prikaz okvare sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij.
The torque limiter shall be deactivated during the qualification phase.
Omejevalnik navora se deaktivira med fazo kvalificiranja.
For the demonstration phase, the engine shall be run over a maximum of four OBD test cycles.
Za fazo dokazovanja motor deluje v največ štirih preskusnih ciklusih OBD.
No failure other than the ones which are being considered for demonstration purposes shall be present.
Ne smejo se pojaviti druge okvare razen tistih, ki se pojavijo za namene dokazovanja.
Prior to starting the test sequence of section 6.5.8.3.3, the emission control monitoring system shall be set to a “no failure” status.
Pred začetkom preskusnega zaporedja iz točke 6.5.8.3.3 je treba sistem za spremljanje nadzora emisij postaviti v stanje „ni okvare“.
Depending on the NOx level selected, the system shall activate a warning signal and in addition, if applicable, the torque limiter at any time before the end of the detection sequence.
V odvisnosti od izbrane ravni NOx sistem kadar koli pred koncem zaporedja detekcij sproži opozorilni signal in, če je ustrezno, omejevalnik navora.
The detection sequence may be stopped once the NOx control monitoring system has properly reacted.
Zaporedje detekcije se prekine, ko se sistem za spremljanje nadzora NOx ustrezno odzove.
In the case of an emission control monitoring system principally based on monitoring the NOx level by sensors positioned in the exhaust stream, the manufacturer may choose to directly monitor certain system functionalities (e.g. interruption of dosing activity, closed EGR valve) for the determination of compliance.
V primeru sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij, ki ima podlago v spremljanju ravni NOx s pomočjo senzorjev, nameščenih v izpušni tok, lahko proizvajalec za dokazovanje skladnosti izbere neposredno spremljanje določenih funkcionalnosti (npr. prekinitev doziranja, zaprtje ventila EGR).
In that case, the selected system functionality shall be demonstrated.
V takem primeru se dokazuje izbrana funkcionalnost sistema.
The level of torque reduction required in section 6.5.5.3 by the torque limiter shall be approved together with the general engine performance approval in accordance with Directive 80/1269/EC.
Raven znižanja navora, zahtevana v točki 6.5.5.3 za omejevalnik navora, se v skladu z Direktivo 80/1269/EHS odobri skupaj z odobritvijo splošnih zmogljivosti motorja.
For the demonstration process, the manufacturer shall demonstrate to the type-approval authority the inclusion of the correct torque limiter into the engine ECU.
Za postopek dokazovanja proizvajalec dokaže homologacijskemu organu vgradnjo pravilnega omejevalnika navora v motor ECU.
Separate torque measurement during the demonstration is not required.
Ne zahteva se ločeno merjenje navora med dokazovanjem.
As an alternative to sections 6.5.8.3.3 to 6.5.8.3.5, the demonstration of the emission control monitoring system and the torque limiter may be performed by testing a vehicle.
Kot druga možnost k točkam 6.5.8.3.3 do 6.5.8.3.5 se lahko dokazovanje delovanja sistema za spremljanje emisij in omejevalnika navora izvede s preskušanjem vozila.
The vehicle shall be driven on the road or on a test track with the selected incorrect operations or failures of the emission control monitoring system to demonstrate that the warning signal and activation of the torque limiter will operate in accordance with the requirements of section 6.5, and, in particular, those in sections 6.5.5.2. and 6.5.5.3.
Vozilo se pelje po cesti ali po preskusni progi z izbranimi nepravilnimi delovanji ali okvarami sistema za spremljanje nadzora emisij, da se tako dokaže, da opozorilni signal in sprožitev delovanja omejevalnika navora delujeta v skladu z zahtevami iz točke 6.5 in zlasti zahtevami iz točk 6.5.5.2 in 6.5.5.3.
If the storage in the computer memory of a non-erasable fault code is required for complying with the requirements of section 6.5, the following three conditions shall be met by the end of demonstration sequence:
Če se za skladnost z zahtevami iz točke 6.5 zahteva shranjevanje neizbrisne kode okvare v računalniškem pomnilniku, morajo biti na koncu zaporedja dokazovanja izpolnjeni naslednji trije pogoji:
that it is possible to confirm via the OBD scan tool the presence in the OBD computer memory of the appropriate non-erasable fault code described in section 6.5.3.3 and that it can be shown to the satisfaction of the type approval authority that the scan tool cannot erase it, and,
da je s pregledovalnikom OBD možno potrditi prisotnost računalniškega pomnilnika OBD za ustrezno neizbrisno kodo okvare, opisano v točki 6.5.3.3, in da se lahko homologacijskemu organu zadovoljivo dokaže, da pregledovalnik kode ne more izbrisati, in
that it is possible to confirm the time spent during the detection sequence with the warning signal activated by reading the non-erasable counter referred to in section 3.9.2 of Annex IV to Directive 2005/78/EC, and that it can be shown to the satisfaction of the type approval authority that the scan tool cannot erase it, and,
da je možno potrditi porabljeni čas med zaporedjem detekcije z opozorilnim signalom, sproženim ob branju neizbrisnega števca iz točke 3.9.2 Priloge IV k Direktivi 2005/78/ES, in da se lahko homologacijskemu organu zadovoljivo dokaže, da pregledovalnik kode ne more izbrisati, in
that the type-approval authority has approved the elements of design showing that this non-erasable information is stored in accordance with section 3.9.2 of Annex IV to Directive 2005/78/EC for a minimum of 400 days or 9600 hours of engine operation.’
da je homologacijski organ odobril elemente zasnove, ki dokazujejo, da je ta neizbrisna informacija v skladu s točko 3.9.2 Priloge IV k Direktivi 2005/78/ES shranjena za najmanj 400 dni ali 9600 ur delovanja motorja.“
AMENDMENTS TO DIRECTIVE 2005/78/EC
SPREMEMBE DIREKTIVE 2005/78/ES
in section 3.6.4 ‘permanent emission default mode’ is replaced by ‘emission default mode’;
V točki 3.6.4 se besede „stalni privzeti način emisije“ nadomestijo z besedilom „privzeti načini emisij“.
in the second paragraph of section 3.7 ‘permanent emission default mode’ is replaced by ‘emission default mode’;
V drugem odstavku točke 3.7 se besede „stalni privzeti način emisije“ nadomestijo z besedilom „privzeti načine emisij“.
section 3.8.3. is replaced by the following:
Točka 3.8.3 se nadomesti:
In the case of MI activation due to incorrect operation of the engine system with respect to NOx control measures, or incorrect reagent consumption and dosing activity, the MI may be switched back to the previous state of activation if the conditions given in section 6.5.3., 6.5.4 and 6.5.7. of Annex I to Directive 2005/55/EC no longer apply.’;
V primeru sprožitve MI zaradi nepravilnega delovanja sistema motorja glede na nadzorne ukrepe NOx, nepravilno porabo reagenta ali doziranja, se lahko MI preklopi nazaj v prvotno stanje sprožitve, če ne veljajo več pogoji iz točk 6.5.3, 6.5.4 in 6.5.7 Priloge k Direktivi 2005/55/ES.“
section 3.9.2. is replaced by the following:
Točka 3.9.2 se nadomesti:
From 9 November 2006 for new type approvals and from 1 October 2007 for all registrations, in the case of a non-erasable fault code being generated according to sections 6.5.3 or 6.5.4 of Annex I to Directive 2005/55/EC, the OBD system shall retain a record of the fault code and the hours run by the engine during the MI activation for at least 400 days or 9600 hours of engine operation.
Od 9. novembra 2006 za nove homologacije in od 1. oktobra 2007 za vse prijave sistem OBD, v primeru neizbrisne kode okvare, nastale v skladu s točko 6.5.3 ali 6.5.4 Priloge I k Direktivi 2005/55/ES, hrani zapis kode okvare in število ur delovanja motorja, ko je bil sprožen MI, vsaj za 400 dni ali 9600 ur delovanja motorja.
Any such fault code and the corresponding hours run by the engine during MI activation shall not be erased through use of any external diagnostic or other tool as referred to in section 6.8.3 of this Annex.’
Vse takšne kode okvar in ustrezno število ur delovanja motorja, ko je bil sprožen MI, se ne smejo izbrisati z uporabo katerega koli zunanjega diagnostičnega ali drugega orodja, kot je določeno v točki 6.8.3 te priloge.“
point 2 is replaced by the following:
Točka 2 se nadomesti:
Example of applying requirements set out in this Directive and Directive 2005/55/EC for the third approval (with, as yet, no extension) corresponding to application date B1 with OBD stage I, issued by the United Kingdom:
Primer uporabe zahtev, določenih v tej direktivi in Direktivi 2005/55/ES, za tretjo homologacijo (za zdaj brez razširitev), ki ustreza datumu začetka uporabe B1 z OBD-fazo I, ki jo je izdalo Združeno Kraljestvo:
e11*2005/55*2005/78B*0003*00’;
e11*2005/55*2005/78B*0003*00“
point 3 is replaced by the following:
Točka 3 se nadomesti:
Example of applying requirements set out in Directives 2005/55/EC and amending Directive 2006/51/EC for the second extension to the fourth approval corresponding to application date B2, with OBD stage II, issued by Germany:
Primer uporabe zahtev, določenih v Direktivi 2005/55/ES in Direktivi o spremembi Direktive 2006/51/ES za drugo razširitev k četrti homologaciji, ki ustreza datumu začetka uporabe B2 z OBD-fazo II, ki jo je izdala Nemčija:
e1*2005/55*2006/51F*0004*02’;
e1*2005/55*2006/51F*0004*02“
the following point 4 is added:
Doda se točka 4:
Table showing the characters to be used in accordance with the different implementation dates set out in Directive 2005/55/EC:
Tabela z znaki, ki se jih uporablja v skladu z različnimi datumi začetka izvajanja, določenimi v Direktivi 2005/55/ES:
Row [1]
Vrstica [1]
OBD Stage I [2]
OBD-faza I [2]
OBD Stage II
OBD-faza II
In accordance with table I, section 6 of Annex I to Directive 2005/55/EC.
V skladu s tabelo I iz točke 6 Priloge I k Direktivi 2005/55/ES.
In accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2005/55/EC, gas engines are excluded from OBD stage I.
V skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2005/55/ES so plinski motorji izključeni iz OBD-faze I.
In accordance with section 6.5 of Annex I to Directive 2005/55/EC.’
V skladu s točko 6.5 Priloge I k Direktivi 2005/55/ES.“
Directive 2006/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2006/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
amending Directive 95/2/EC on food additives other than colours and sweeteners and Directive 94/35/EC on sweeteners for use in foodstuffs
o spremembi Direktive 95/2/ES o aditivih za živila razen barvil in sladil in Direktive 94/35/ES o sladilih za uporabo v živilih
Food additives may be approved for use in foodstuffs only if they comply with Annex II to Council Directive 89/107/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning food additives authorized for use in foodstuffs intended for human consumption.
Aditivi za živila se lahko odobrijo za uporabo v živilih samo, če so v skladu s Prilogo II k Direktivi Sveta 89/107/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1988 o približevanju zakonodaj držav članic o aditivih za živila, ki se smejo uporabljati v živilih, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi.
Directive 95/2/EC lays down a list of food additives that may be used in the Community and the conditions for their use.
Direktiva 95/2/ES določa seznam aditivov za živila, ki se jih lahko uporablja v Skupnosti, in pogoje za njihovo uporabo.
Directive 94/35/EC lays down a list of sweeteners that may be used in the Community and the conditions for their use.
Direktiva 94/35/ES določa seznam sladil, ki se jih lahko uporablja v Skupnosti, in pogoje za njihovo uporabo.
There have been technical developments in the field of food additives since the adoption of Directives 95/2/EC and 94/35/EC.
Od sprejetja direktiv 95/2/ES in 94/35/ES je na področju aditivov za živila prišlo do tehničnega razvoja.
These Directives should be adapted to take account of those developments.
Ti direktivi bi se morali prilagoditi tako, da bo ta razvoj upoštevan.
On the basis of an opinion of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), expressed on 26 November 2003, changes are made to current authorisations in order to keep the level of nitrosamines as low as possible by bringing down the levels of nitrites and nitrates added to food whilst maintaining the microbiological safety of food products.
Na podlagi mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA), izraženega 26. novembra 2003, se trenutna dovoljenja spreminjajo z namenom ohranjati čim nižjo stopnjo nitrozaminov z nižanjem stopenj nitritov in nitratov, dodanih živilom, ob ohranjanju mikrobiološke varnosti živil.
EFSA recommends that the levels of nitrite and nitrate are set in the legislation as ‘added amount’.
EFSA priporoča, da so vsebnosti nitritov in nitratov v zakonodaji določene kot „dodana količina“.
EFSA is of the opinion that the added amount of nitrite rather than the residual amount contributes to the inhibitory activity against C. botulinum.
EFSA meni, da dodana količina nitrita in ne količina ostanka prispeva k zaviranju delovanja proti C. botulinum.
The current provisions should be amended in such a way that the maximum levels permitted, as mentioned by EFSA, in non-heat-treated or heat‐treated meat products, in cheese and in fish are expressed as added amounts.
Trenutne določbe bi morale biti spremenjene tako, da so največje dovoljene vsebnosti, kakor so navedene s strani EFSA, v toplotno neobdelanih ali toplotno obdelanih mesnih izdelkih, v siru in ribah določene kot dodane količine.
Exceptionally, however, for certain traditionally manufactured meat products maximum residual levels should be set, on the condition that the products are adequately specified and identified.
Vendar se morajo izjemoma za nekatere tradicionalno proizvedene mesne izdelke določiti najvišje dovoljene vsebnosti ostanka, pod pogojem, da so izdelki ustrezno določeni in opredeljeni.
The levels set should ensure that the acceptable daily intake (ADI) established by the Scientific Committee on Food in 1990 is not exceeded.
Stopnje, ki so določene, naj zagotovijo, da sprejemljivi dnevni vnos (SDV), ki ga je leta 1990 opredelil Znanstveni odbor za živila, ni prekoračen.
Products which are not specifically named in this Directive, but which are traditionally produced in a similar manner (i.e. similar products) can if necessary be categorised in accordance with Articles 5 and 6 of Directive 95/2/EC.
Izdelke, ki jih ta direktiva izrecno ne navaja, vendar se tradicionalno proizvajajo na podoben način (tj. podobni izdelki), se po potrebi lahko razvrsti v skladu s členoma 5 in 6 Direktive 95/2/ES.
For cheese, the level should be expressed as the amount added to the cheese milk.
Pri siru je treba vsebnost določiti kot dodano količino v mleku, namenjenemu proizvodnji sira.
If a process is used where addition of nitrate follows removal of whey and addition of water, this should lead to levels identical to those which would have been obtained had the nitrate been added directly to the cheese milk.
Če se uporabi postopek, pri katerem odvzemu sirotke ter dodajanju vode sledi dodajanje nitrata, naj bi to privedlo do vsebnosti, enakih tistim, do katerih bi prišli, če bi nitrat dodali neposredno mleku, namenjenemu proizvodnji sira.
Directive 2003/114/EC amending Directive 95/2/EC required the Commission and EFSA to review the conditions for the use of E 214 to E 219 p-hydroxybenzoates and their sodium salts before 1 July 2004.
Direktiva 2003/114/ES o spremembi Direktive 95/2/ES je zahtevala, da Komisija in EFSA ponovno preučita pogoje uporabe E 214 do E 219 p-hidroksibenzoatov in njihovih natrijevih soli pred 1. julijem 2004.
EFSA assessed the information on the safety of p‐hydroxybenzoates and expressed its opinion on 13 July 2004.
EFSA je ocenila informacije o varnosti p-hidroksibenzoatov in svoje mnenje podala 13. julija 2004.
EFSA established a full‐group ADI of 0 to 10 mg/kg body weight for the sum of methyl and ethyl p‐hydroxybenzoic acid esters and their sodium salts.
Za celo skupino je določila SDV 0–10 mg/kg telesne teže za vsoto metil in etil p-hidroksibenzojskih estrov kislin ter njihovih natrijevih soli.
EFSA considered that propyl paraben should not be included in this group ADI because propyl paraben, contrary to methyl and ethyl paraben, had effects on sex hormones and the male reproductive organs in juvenile rats.
EFSA je menila, da propil paraben ne sme biti vključen v to skupino SDV, ker je propil paraben v nasprotju z metil in etil parabenom učinkoval na spolne hormone in moške reproduktivne organe mladih podgan.
Therefore, EFSA was unable to recommend an ADI for propyl paraben because of the lack of a clear no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL).
Zaradi pomanjkanja jasne ravni brez-opaznega-škodljivega-učinka (NOAEL) EFSA ni mogla priporočiti SDV za propil paraben.
It is necessary to withdraw E 216 propyl p‐hydroxybenzoate and E 217 sodium propyl p-hydroxybenzoate from Directive 95/2/EC.
V Direktivi 95/2/ES je treba črtati E 216 propil p-hidroksibenzoat in E 217 natrij propil p-hidroksibenzoat.
In addition, it is necessary to withdraw the use of p-hydroxybenzoates in liquid dietary food supplements.
Hkrati je treba umakniti uporabo p-hidroksibenzoatov v prehranskih dopolnilih v tekoči obliki.
Commission Decision 2004/374/EC suspended the placing on the market and import of jelly mini-cups containing gel-forming food additives derived from seaweed and certain gums due to the risk of choking on these products.
Odločba Komisije 2004/374/ES je začasno odložila dajanje v promet in uvoz žele dražejev, ki vsebujejo aditive za živila za oblikovanje gela, pridobljenih iz alg in določenih gumijev, zaradi tveganja zadušitve s temi izdelki.
Following a review of that Decision it is necessary to exclude the use of certain gel-forming food additives in jelly mini-cups.
Da se sledi ugotovitvam te odločbe, je treba izločiti uporabo nekaterih aditivov za živila za oblikovanje gela v žele dražejih.