natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the exporting producer with MET did not perform any domestic sales and since no other Chinese exporting producer had been awarded MET, SG&A and profit had to be determined on the basis of any other reasonable method pursuant to Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Ker proizvajalec izvoznik s TGO ni prodajal na domačem trgu in ker nobenemu drugemu kitajskemu proizvajalcu izvozniku TGO ni bil odobren, je bilo treba PSA-stroške in dobiček določiti na podlagi katere koli druge primerne metode v skladu s členom 2(6)(c) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, the Commission used SG&A and profit rates from Chinese exporting producers that recently obtained MET in other investigations and which had domestic sales in the ordinary course of trade as stipulated by Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je Komisija uporabila PSA-stroške in stopnje dobička kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bil nedavno dodeljen TGO v drugih preiskavah in katerih domača prodaja je bila v okviru običajnega poteka trgovine, kot je določeno v členu 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
The SG&A and profit average rates found in these investigations were compounded on the cost of manufacturing incurred by the exporting producer in question with regard to the exported models.
PSA-stroški in povprečne stopnje dobička, ugotovljene v teh preiskavah, so bili prišteti stroškom proizvodnje, ki so jih imeli zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki pri izvoženih modelih.
Determination of the normal value established in the analogue country
Določitev normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi
Some parties argued that it was not appropriate to have chosen Brazil as analogue country allegedly as the sole or main reason on the basis of the representativeness of the domestic sales, in this country compared to alternatively suggested analogue countries.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da izbira Brazilije kot primerljive države ni ustrezna, saj naj bi temeljila samo in predvsem na podlagi reprezentativnosti domače prodaje v tej državi v primerjavi z drugimi predlaganimi primerljivimi državami.
First, it should be stressed that the representativeness of the domestic sales is not the sole reason for having chosen Brazil.
Najprej je treba poudariti, da reprezentativnost domače prodaje ni bila edini razlog za izbiro Brazilije.
It is recalled that other factors such as the competition on the Brazilian market, the difference in the costs of production structures including the access to raw materials and the know-how of the Brazilian producers were analysed in the recitals 109 to 123 of the provisional Regulation and led to the same conclusion.
Treba je opomniti, da so bili v uvodnih izjavah 109 do 123 začasne uredbe analizirani tudi drugi dejavniki, kot so konkurenčnost brazilskega trga, razlika v stroških proizvodnih struktur, vključno z dostopom do surovin ter znanje in izkušnje brazilskih proizvajalcev, ki so pripeljali do iste ugotovitve.
Incidentally, the choice of Brazil was found to be even more appropriate given the decision to exclude STAF from the product scope, since contrary to the other countries proposed by the above mentioned parties, the Brazilian companies hardly produce STAF.
Izbira Brazilije se je glede na odločitev o izključitvi obutve STAF iz obsega izdelka zdela celo primernejša, saj v nasprotju z drugimi predlaganimi državami brazilske družbe izdelkov STAF skorajda ne proizvajajo.
As regards other factors invoked by interested parties, such as the socio-economic and cultural developments or the labour costs, they were not deemed relevant for determining whether Brazil is an appropriate analogue country.
Drugi dejavniki, na katere se sklicujejo zainteresirane stranke, kot so socialno-ekonomski in kulturni razvoj ali stroški dela, se za odločitev o tem, ali je Brazilija ustrezna primerljiva država, niso zdeli pomembni.
Moreover, in terms of economic development Brazil is not very different from other proposed analogue countries such as Thailand and Indonesia.
Poleg tega se Brazilija glede na ekonomski razvoj ne razlikuje veliko od drugih predlaganih primerljivih držav, kot sta Tajska in Indonezija.
The choice of Brazil was therefore not deemed unreasonable.
Izbira Brazilije se zato ni štela za neprimerno.
Moreover, although the sole fact that the domestic sales of the analogue country were below the minimum level of 5 % does not necessarily signify that that country would be inappropriate, a figure of less than 2 % for domestic sales in the case of the Thai and the Indonesian companies that were proposed by some parties, nevertheless amounts to an indication that those markets are less representative than that of Brazil.
Čeprav samo dejstvo, da je domača prodaja primerljive države pod najmanjšo možno ravnijo 5 %, ne pomeni nujno, da je taka država neprimerna, pa podatek o tem, da je pri tajskih in indonezijskih družbah, ki so jih predlagale nekatere stranke, domača prodaja znašala manj kot 2 %, vendarle kaže na to, da sta ta dva trga manj reprezentativna od brazilskega.
In addition, the level of the domestic sales, although not the sole reason for having chosen Brazil, was however particularly relevant in this specific case given the large number of different types of shoes which are produced in the countries concerned and which need to be compared to the footwear produced in the analogue country that most closely resembles the footwear produced in the countries concerned.
Poleg tega je bila raven domače prodaje pri izbiri Brazilije vendarle posebno pomemben, čeprav ne edini razlog, glede na veliko število različnih vrst čevljev, ki se izdelujejo v zadevnih državah in jih je treba primerjati z obutvijo, izdelano v primerljivi državi, ki mora biti čimbolj podobna obutvi, ki jo proizvajajo zadevne države.
Some parties claimed that the use of closely comparable product control numbers (‘PCN’) used by ther Commission to make its preliminary determination would not provide an accurate and fair comparison of export prices with normal values.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da uporaba zelo primerljivih številčnih oznak izdelka („ŠOI“), ki jih Komisija uporablja za predhodno opredelitev, ne bi zagotovila natančne in poštene primerjave izvoznih cen z normalnimi vrednostmi.
It is noted that obviously not all PCNs sold by the exporting countries could be matched in Brazil.
Opozarja se, da vse ŠOI, ki jih prodajajo izvozne države, očitno ne ustrezajo tistim v Braziliji.
In these circumstances, to resort to the most closely resembling PCNs for the purpose of making a fair comparison is deemed the most reasonable approach.
V teh okoliščinah se zdi najboljši pristop za pošteno primerjavo odločitev za uporabo najbolj podobnih ŠOI.
In addition, adjustments (e.g. children's shoes, leather quality) were made to address material differences in features between the shoes exported by the exporting countries and the closely resembling types sold in Brazil.
Poleg tega so bile narejene prilagoditve (npr. otroški čevlji, kakovost usnja), da bi se upoštevale razlike v lastnostih materiala med čevlji, ki jih izvažajo države izvoznice, in zelo podobnimi vrstami čevljev, ki se prodajajo v Braziliji.
These features were either not envisaged by the PCN scheme at the early time of its creation or were not fully embodied in the available data submitted by interested parties.
Te razlike bodisi niso bile predvidene v sistemih kontrolnih številk izdelkov na začetku njihovega oblikovanja bodisi niso bile v celoti vključene v razpoložljive podatke, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke.
It is further recalled that all sales of leather footwear by the cooperating Brazilian producers are higher than the total sales of producers willing to cooperate from the proposed other analogue countries of Indonesia, India and Thailand.
Opozarja se tudi, da je celotna prodaja usnjene obutve sodelujočih brazilskih proizvajalcev višja od skupne prodaje proizvajalcev, iz predlaganih primerljivih držav Indonezije, Indije in Tajske, ki so pripravljeni sodelovati.
It was therefore considered that the range of the products manufactured by the Brazilian companies was likely to be larger than those manufactured in the other countries considered.
Zato se je zdelo, da je paleta izdelkov, ki jih izdelujejo brazilske družbe, verjetno širša od palete izdelkov, ki se izdelujejo v drugih zadevnih državah.
Consequently, the likelihood of finding Brazilian shoe types comparable with Chinese/Vietnamese shoe types was deemed to be more likely.
Zato se je zdela verjetnost, da bi našli brazilske vrste čevljev, ki bodo primerljivi s kitajskimi in vietnamskimi, večja.
Indeed the six Thai companies, the two Indonesian companies and the Indian company respectively reported total sales (i.e. domestic and exports) of less than 8 million pairs (i.e. less than 5 % of the exports concerned) while the eight Brazilian companies which cooperated reported total sales of more than 40 million pairs, from which more than 18 million pairs for the sole three companies whose data were used.
Poročila šestih tajskih in dveh indonezijskih podjetij ter indijskega podjetja dejansko kažejo, da je njihova celotna prodaja (tj. domača prodaja in izvoz) znašala manj kot 8 milijonov parov (tj. manj kot 5 % zadevnega izvoza), medtem ko je osem brazilskih sodelujočih podjetij poročalo o celotni prodaji v višini več kot 40 milijonov parov; od tega je več kot 18 milijonov pripadalo trem podjetjem, katerih podatki so bili uporabljeni.
Under these circumstances, it is obvious that the likelihood of finding models produced by the Brazilian companies comparable to the models sold by the countries concerned is higher than with the Thai, Indian or Indonesian companies.
V takšnih okoliščinah je verjetnost, da bi našli modele, ki so jih izdelale brazilske družbe, primerljive modelom, ki jih prodajajo zadevne države, očitno večja kot pri tajskih, indijskih ali indonezijskih družbah.
One party argued that the range of the Brazilian production is not as wide and diversified as the production of the countries concerned.
Ena stranka je trdila, da paleta brazilske proizvodnje ni tako široka in raznolika kot proizvodnja zadevnih držav.
However, in view of the above, it can be reasonably assumed that the product range of the Brazilian companies which provided the necessary information and whose sales (domestic and export) were found to be 6 to 13 times larger than those reported by the Indian, Indonesian or Thai companies, is wide and diversified.
Vendar je glede na zgoraj navedeno razumno sklepati, da je paleta izdelkov brazilskih družb, ki so predložile potrebne podatke in katerih ugotovljena prodaja (domača prodaja in izvoz) je bila 6 do 13-krat večja kot tista, o kateri so poročale indijske, indonezijske in tajske družbe, široka in raznolika.
Interested parties also referred to an alleged contradiction between recital 108 of the provisional Regulation which stated that ‘Brazil appeared to be the most reasonable choice in view of the representativeness of its domestic sales which permitted to avoid construction of the normal value and possible numerous adjustments’ and recital 123 of the provisional Regulation which concluded that the difference in the quality of the leather used by the companies selected in the sample and the Brazilian producers ‘is not a reason to reject Brazil as a suitable analogue country as an adjustment for a difference in physical characteristics can be made to take into account any difference in the quality of the leather’.
Zainteresirane stranke so se sklicevale na domnevno protislovje med uvodno izjavo 108 začasne uredbe, ki navaja, da je „Brazilija najbolj razumna izbira glede na reprezentativnost njene domače prodaje, saj omogoča, da se izognemo izračunu normalne vrednosti in morebitnim številnim spremembam“ ter uvodno izjavo 123 začasne uredbe, ki sklene, da razlika v kakovosti usnja, ki ga uporabljajo v vzorec izbrane družbe in brazilski proizvajalci „ni razlog za zavrnitev Brazilije kot ustrezne primerljive države, saj je razlike v fizičnih lastnostih mogoče prilagoditi in tako upoštevati vse razlike v kakovosti usnja“.
However, there is no contradiction since recital 108 of the provisional Regulation only states that the choice of Brazil is more suitable because fewer adjustments will be required than for other potential analogue countries.
Vsekakor ne gre za nikakršno nasprotje, saj uvodna izjava 108 začasne uredbe navaja le, da je izbira Brazilije bolj primerna zato, ker zahteva manj prilagoditev kot druge možne primerljive države.
Furthermore, it is obviously not possible at an early stage of the investigation to know exactly which adjustments will eventually be required in order to make an appropriate comparison.
Poleg tega je jasno, da v začetni fazi preiskave ni mogoče natančno vedeti, katere prilagoditve bodo potrebne za ustrezno primerjavo.
Similarly, such adjustments would probably also have been necessary, had another country been chosen as an analogue country.
Prav tako bi bile take prilagoditve najverjetneje potrebne tudi v primeru, če bi bila za primerljivo državo izbrana druga država.
However, given the insufficient representativeness of the domestic sales of the other countries proposed and given also the likely thin range of their production, it can reasonably be assumed that their normal value would have to be constructed and that more adjustments would have been necessary to make Thai, Indonesian or Indian models comparable to those produced in the countries concerned than it was the case with the Brazilian domestic sales prices.
Vendar pa je glede na nezadostno reprezentativnost domače prodaje drugih predlaganih držav in na verjetno ozko paleto njihove proizvodnje razumno sklepati, da bi bilo treba njihovo normalno vrednost konstruirati in da bi bilo potrebnih več prilagoditev, da bi bili tajski, indonezijski ali indijski modeli primerljivih s tistimi, proizvedenimi v zadevnih državah, kot je bilo to potrebno pri brazilskih domačih prodajnih cenah.
As regards the economic development and the income per capita, while they are normally deemed irrelevant, it is recalled as mentioned in recital 115 of the provisional Regulation that on the basis of the World Bank's main criteria for classifying economies is gross national income per capita, Brazil is classified in the same category as the PRC, Thailand and Indonesia.
Kar zadeva gospodarski razvoj in dohodek na prebivalca, kar se običajno ne šteje za pomemben dejavnik, se, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 115 začasne uredbe, opominja, da je na podlagi glavnih meril Svetovne banke za razvrščanje gospodarstev, tj. bruto nacionalnega dohodka na prebivalca, Brazilija uvrščena v isto kategorijo kot LRK, Tajska in Indonezija.
Moreover, neither labour costs concerning the sampled exporting producers in the PRC nor in Vietnam were as such, compared to the conditions of the sampled producers in Brazil, that this could have warranted an adjustment.
Poleg tega niti stroški dela v zvezi z vzorčenimi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK niti v Vietnamu v primerjavi s pogoji vzorčenih proizvajalcev v Braziliji niso taki, da bi to lahko utemeljilo prilagoditev.
It is also noted that nominal differences in costs between the analogue country and the exporting country concerned are not as such relevant.
Opozarja se tudi, da nominalne razlike v stroških med primerljivo državo in zadevno državo izvoznico kot take niso bistvene.
Indeed, as costs and prices are in general not considered as a viable basis for determining normal value in countries falling under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, such comparison in fact defeats the purpose of resorting to the methods set out in Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Ker se na podlagi stroškov in cen v državah, ki spadajo v člen 2(7) osnovne uredbe, na splošno ne da zanesljivo določiti normalne vrednosti, je s to primerjavo uporaba metod iz člena 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe nesmiselna.
Some parties argued that Brazil is not an appropriate analogue country due to the alleged subsidies given to the footwear producers in the northern territories.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da Brazilija ni ustrezna primerljiva država zaradi subvencij, ki so jih domnevno deležni proizvajalci obutve na severnih ozemljih.
According to these parties, these subsidies aimed at attracting footwear production to the northern part of Brazil thus affecting the competitiveness of the market.
Po izjavah teh strank je namen navedenih subvencij pritegniti proizvajalce obutve v severni del Brazilije in tako vplivati na konkurenčnost trga.
First, it should be noted that this allegation was not supported by any evidence.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da ta domneva ni bila podprta z nobenim dokazom.
In addition, the companies used for the determination of the normal value were not located in the Northern territories but in the South and could therefore not be affected by these alleged subsidies.
Poleg tega se družbe, ki so bile uporabljene za določitev normalne vrednosti, niso nahajale na severnih ozemljih, ampak na jugu, in zato navedenih domnevnih subvencij niso mogle prejeti.
Finally, should these State interventions exist as described by the exporters, that mechanism would only prevent other companies from setting up a factory in the same area but not to sell their product in certain parts of the Brazilian market.
Nenazadnje, če bi te državne intervencije obstajale, kot opisujejo izvozniki, bi ta mehanizem drugim družbam zgolj preprečil ustanoviti tovarno na istem območju, ne pa tudi prodajati njihovih izdelkov na določenih predelih brazilskega trga.
The shoe market is certainly neither a local nor a regional market but rather a national and even worldwide market.
Trg z obutvijo zagotovo ni niti lokalen niti regionalen, ampak je prisoten na nacionalni in celo svetovni ravni.
Therefore, the fact that a company may receive subsidies to set up a factory in a remote area does not prevent competition especially on a market of 7000 producers.
Zato dejstvo, da je družba morda prejela subvencije za ustanovitev tovarne na oddaljenem področju, ne preprečuje konkurence, zlasti ne na trgu s 7000 proizvajalci.
Even though costs might eventually be affected by the alleged state subsidies, these should in all likelihood only have a downward effect on sales prices which would tend to reduce normal value and thus any dumping margins.
Čeprav bi domnevne državne subvencije morda lahko vplivale na stroške, bi po vsej verjetnosti povzročile le padec prodajnih cen, kar bi verjetno vodilo v znižanje normalne vrednosti in s tem stopenj dampinga.
In addition, in view of the reasons provided for in recital 109 of the provisional Regulation and particularly the fact that there are more than 7000 producers in Brazil, the competition on the Brazilian market was not deemed inappropriate to reject Brazil as an analogue country.
Poleg tega se glede na razloge iz uvodne izjave 109 začasne uredbe in zlasti dejstvo, da je v Braziliji več kot 7000 proizvajalcev, konkurenčnost na brazilskem trgu ne šteje za neprimerno in ni razlog za zavrnitev Brazilije kot primerljive države.
On the basis of the above and since the claim was not further substantiated, the claim was therefore rejected.
Na podlagi navedenega in glede na to, da ni bilo dodatne utemeljitve zahtevka, je bila ta trditev zavrnjena.
It was therefore concluded that Brazil was an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing the normal value as already concluded in recital 124 of the provisional Regulation.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da je Brazilija ustrezna primerljiva država za namen določitve normalne vrednosti, kakor je bilo sklenjeno že v uvodni izjavi 124 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments by interested parties the methodology set out in recitals 128 to 130 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker zainteresirane stranke niso predložile nobenih pripomb, se potrdi metodologija, določena v uvodnih izjavah 128 do 130 začasne uredbe.
Some parties argued that the findings should not have been based on export prices of companies in the samples when calculating the country-wide dumping margin.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da pri izračunavanju stopnje dampinga na ravni države ugotovitve ne bi smele temeljiti na izvoznih cenah družb v vzorcu.
Findings should have rather been based on the country wide export volume (e.g. Eurostat data).
Temeljiti bi morale na obsegu izvoza na ravni države (npr. podatki Eurostata).
It is recalled that the sampling provisions stipulated under Article 17 of the basic Regulation were applied in this particular proceeding.
Opozarja se, da so se pri tem postopku uporabljale določbe glede vzorčenja, navedene v členu 17 osnovne uredbe.
Therefore only export prices of the sampled companies were used.
Zato so se uporabile le izvozne cene vzorčenih družb.
For sampled companies that did not meet the MET/IT criteria one weighted average dumping margin was calculated.
Za vzorčene družbe, ki niso izpolnjevale meril TGO/IO, je bilo izračunano eno tehtano povprečje stopnje dampinga.
Furthermore, as explained under recital 135 of the provisional Regulation, this weighted average dumping margin applies to cooperating non-sampled companies in accordance with Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 135 začasne uredbe, se to tehtano povprečje stopnje dampinga uporablja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vzorčene, v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
In addition, as cooperation was high the same dumping margin was applied to all other Chinese exporting producers as well.
In ker je bilo sodelovanje dobro, se je ista stopnja dampinga uporabila tudi za vse druge kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike.
Some parties claimed that not all details relevant to conduct the comparison of export prices had been disclosed.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da niso bile razkrite vse podrobnosti, ki so bistvene za izvedbo primerjave izvoznih cen.
In particular, the adjustments made to the normal values determined on the basis of Brazilian data had not been quantified according to these parties.
Po izjavah teh strank prilagoditve normalnih vrednosti na podlagi brazilskih podatkov niso bile količinsko ovrednotene.
Having duly considered all comments received by interested parties and duly revised the files, it was found appropriate to make a correction to the adjustments made on leather costs, as addressed in recital 132 of the provisional Regulation.
Po ustrezni proučitvi vseh pripomb, ki so jih poslale zainteresirane stranke, in ustreznem pregledu dokumentacije je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bil popravek prilagoditve za stroške usnja, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi 132 začasne uredbe, ustrezen.
It was found that the producers in the exporting countries, particularly those in China, were selling leather footwear of higher quality than Brazilian producers did on their domestic market.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so proizvajalci v državah izvoznicah, zlasti tisti na Kitajskem, prodajali usnjeno obutev višje kakovosti, kot so jo prodajali brazilski proizvajalci na domačem trgu.
The difference in the quality of shoes was essentially due to a higher quality of the leather used.
Razlika v kakovosti čevljev je predvsem temeljila na boljši kakovosti usnja.
The quality difference was also mirrored in the purchase price of the leather used: the leather of the footwear exported from China and Vietnam was more expensive than that used in Brazil to manufacture domestically-sold shoes.
Razlika v kakovosti se je odražala tudi v nakupni ceni uporabljenega usnja: usnje obutve, izvožene iz Kitajske in Vietnama, je bilo dražje od usnja, ki se je uporabljalo v Braziliji za izdelavo čevljev za domačo prodajo.
For this purpose, the value of leather inputs of analogue country producers were compared to the corresponding values of leather inputs used by Chinese and Vietnamese producers that were part of the sample.
Zato se je vrednost uporabljenega usnja proizvajalcev primerljive države primerjala z ustrezno vrednostjo usnja, ki ga za proizvodnjo obutve uporabljajo kitajski in vietnamski proizvajalci, vključeni v vzorec.
It was found that most of the leather used by Chinese and Vietnamese producers had been imported from market economy countries.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je večina usnja, ki ga uporabljajo kitajski in vietnamski proizvajalci, uvožena iz držav s tržno ekonomijo.