natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the different systems established for the cross-border provision of services on a temporary and occasional basis on the one hand, and for establishment on the other, the criteria for distinguishing between these two concepts in the event of the movement of the service provider to the territory of the host Member State should be clarified.
Z ozirom na različne sisteme, ki so vzpostavljeni za občasno ali priložnostno čezmejno opravljanje storitev na eni strani in za ustanovitev na drugi strani, je potrebno jasno določiti merila za razlikovanje med tema dvema pojmoma v primeru premika ponudnikov storitev na ozemlje države članice gostiteljice.
The facilitation of service provision has to be ensured in the context of strict respect for public health and safety and consumer protection.
Olajšanje opravljanja storitev je treba zagotoviti ob strogem spoštovanju javnega zdravja in varnosti ter varstva potrošnikov.
Therefore, specific provisions should be envisaged for regulated professions having public health or safety implications, which provide cross-frontier services on a temporary or occasional basis.
Zato je treba predvideti posebne določbe za opravljanje občasnih ali priložnostnih čezmejnih storitev za regulirane poklice, ki vplivajo na javno zdravje ali varnost.
Host Member States may, where necessary and in accordance with Community law, provide for declaration requirements.
Države članice gostiteljice lahko, kadar je to potrebno in v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, določijo zahteve po prijavi.
These requirements should not lead to a disproportionate burden on service providers nor hinder or render less attractive the exercise of the freedom to provide services.
Te zahteve ne smejo nesorazmerno obremeniti ponudnikov storitev niti ovirati ali zmanjšati privlačnosti uresničevanja svobode opravljanja storitev.
The need for such requirements should be reviewed periodically in the light of the progress made in establishing a Community framework for administrative cooperation between Member States.
Potrebo po takih zahtevah je treba redno preverjati glede na napredek, dosežen pri določanju okvira Skupnosti za administrativno sodelovanje med državami članicami.
The service provider should be subject to the application of disciplinary rules of the host Member State having a direct and specific link with the professional qualifications, such as the definition of the profession, the scope of activities covered by a profession or reserved to it, the use of titles and serious professional malpractice which is directly and specifically linked to consumer protection and safety.
Za ponudnika storitev bi morala veljati disciplinska pravila države članice gostiteljice, neposredno in posebej povezana s poklicnimi kvalifikacijami, kot so opredelitev poklica, področje dejavnosti, ki jih poklic zajema ali ki so rezervirane za ta poklic, uporaba poklicnih nazivov ter huda malomarnost pri opravljanju poklica, ki je neposredno in posebno povezana z zaščito potrošnikov in varnostjo.
While maintaining, for the freedom of establishment, the principles and safeguards underlying the different systems for recognition in force, the rules of such systems should be improved in the light of experience.
Čeprav je treba zaradi svobode ustanavljanja ohraniti načela in zaščitne ukrepe, ki so podlaga za različne veljavne sisteme priznavanja, se morajo njihova pravila izboljšati glede na pridobljene izkušnje.
Moreover, the relevant directives have been amended on several occasions, and their provisions should be reorganised and rationalised by standardising the principles applicable.
Poleg tega so bile zadevne direktive večkrat spremenjene, zato je njihove določbe treba preoblikovati in poenostaviti tako, da se standardizirajo načela, ki se uporabljajo.
It is therefore necessary to replace Council Directives 89/48/EEC [5] and 92/51/EEC [6], as well as Directive 1999/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [7] on the general system for the recognition of professional qualifications, and Council Directives 77/452/EEC [8], 77/453/EEC [9], 78/686/EEC [10], 78/687/EEC [11], 78/1026/EEC [12], 78/1027/EEC [13], 80/154/EEC [14], 80/155/EEC [15], 85/384/EEC [16], 85/432/EEC [17], 85/433/EEC [18] and 93/16/EEC [19] concerning the professions of nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife, architect, pharmacist and doctor, by combining them in a single text.
Zato je treba zamenjati direktivi Sveta 89/48/EGS [5] in 92/51/EGS [6] kakor tudi Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 1999/42/ES [7] o splošnem sistemu priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij ter direktive Sveta 77/452/EGS [8], 77/453/EGS [9], 78/686/EGS [10], 78/687/EGS [11], 78/1026/EGS [12], 78/1027/EGS [13], 80/154/EGS [14], 80/155/EGS [15], 85/384/EGS [16], 85/432/EGS [17], 85/433/EGS [18] in 93/16/EGS [19] v zvezi s poklici medicinske sestre za splošno zdravstveno nego, zobozdravnika, veterinarja, babice, arhitekta, farmacevta in zdravnika, tako da se združijo v enotno besedilo.
This Directive does not create an obstacle to the possibility of Member States recognising, in accordance with their rules, the professional qualifications acquired outside the territory of the European Union by third country nationals.
Ta direktiva ne preprečuje možnosti, da države članice v skladu s svojimi pravili priznavajo poklicne kvalifikacije, ki so jih državljani tretjih držav pridobili izven ozemlja Evropske unije.
All recognition should respect in any case minimum training conditions for certain professions.
Vsekakor pa se mora pri priznavanju vedno upoštevati minimalne pogoje usposobljenosti za določene poklice.
In the case of the professions covered by the general system for the recognition of qualifications, hereinafter referred to as ‘the general system’, Member States should retain the right to lay down the minimum level of qualification required to ensure the quality of the services provided on their territory.
Države članice naj bi za poklice, za katere se uporablja splošni sistem priznavanja kvalifikacij (v nadaljnjem besedilu: splošni sistem), ohranile pravico, da določijo minimalno raven kvalifikacij, potrebno za zagotovitev kakovosti storitev, ki se opravljajo na njihovem ozemlju.
However, pursuant to Articles 10, 39 and 43 of the Treaty, they should not require a national of a Member State to obtain qualifications, which they generally lay down only in terms of the diplomas awarded under their national educational system, where the person concerned has already obtained all or part of those qualifications in another Member State.
Vendar pa v skladu s členi 10, 39 in 43 Pogodbe ne smejo zahtevati, da državljan države članice pridobi kvalifikacije, ki jih na splošno določajo le za diplome, podeljene v nacionalnem sistemu izobraževanja, če je taka oseba že pridobila vse ali del teh kvalifikacij v drugi državi članici.
As a result, it should be laid down that any host Member State in which a profession is regulated must take account of the qualifications obtained in another Member State and assess whether they correspond to those which it requires.
Zato je treba določiti, da mora vsaka država članica gostiteljica, kjer je poklic reguliran, upoštevati kvalifikacije, pridobljene v drugi državi članici, ter oceniti, ali ustrezajo zahtevanim kvalifikacijam.
The general system for recognition, however, does not prevent a Member State from making any person pursuing a profession on its territory subject to specific requirements due to the application of professional rules justified by the general public interest.
Splošni sistem priznavanja pa državam članicam ne onemogoča, da za osebo, ki na njenem ozemlju opravlja poklic, uporabijo posebne zahteve glede uporabe poklicnih pravil, upravičenih s splošnim javnim interesom.
Rules of this kind relate, for example, to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
Ta pravila se na primer nanašajo na organizacijo poklica, poklicne standarde, vključno s tistimi o etiki, nadzoru in odgovornosti.
Lastly, this Directive is not intended to interfere with Member States' legitimate interest in preventing any of their citizens from evading enforcement of the national law relating to professions.
Namen te direktive ni poseganje v upravičen interes držav članic, da preprečijo, da se njihovi državljani izognejo uporabi nacionalnega prava na področju poklicev.
This Directive concerns the recognition by Member States of professional qualifications acquired in other Member States.
Ta direktiva ureja priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij v državah članicah, ki so bile pridobljene v drugih državah članicah.
It does not, however, concern the recognition by Member States of recognition decisions adopted by other Member States pursuant to this Directive.
Ne ureja pa priznavanja sklepov o priznavanju držav članic, ki jih v skladu s to direktivo sprejmejo druge države članice.
Consequently, individuals holding professional qualifications which have been recognised pursuant to this Directive may not use such recognition to obtain in their Member State of origin rights different from those conferred by the professional qualification obtained in that Member State, unless they provide evidence that they have obtained additional professional qualifications in the host Member State.
Posledično se posamezniki, katerih poklicne kvalifikacije so bile priznane v skladu s to direktivo, na to priznanje ne morejo sklicevati, da bi v državi članici izvora uveljavljali pravice, ki ne izvirajo iz poklicnih kvalifikacij, ki so jih pridobili v tej državi članici, razen če dokažejo, da so pridobili dodatne poklicne kvalifikacije v državi članici gostiteljici.
In order to define the mechanism of recognition under the general system, it is necessary to group the various national education and training schemes into different levels.
Da bi opredelili mehanizem priznavanja po splošnem sistemu, je treba različne nacionalne sheme izobraževanja in usposabljanj zbrati v različne stopnje.
These levels, which are established only for the purpose of the operation of the general system, have no effect upon the national education and training structures nor upon the competence of Member States in this field.
Te stopnje, vzpostavljene zgolj za namen delovanja splošnega sistema, nimajo nobenega vpliva na nacionalne strukture izobraževanja in usposabljanja niti na pristojnosti držav članic na tem področju.
The mechanism of recognition established by Directives 89/48/EEC and 92/51/EEC remains unchanged.
Mehanizem priznavanja, vzpostavljen z direktivama 89/48/EGS in 92/51/EGS, ostaja nespremenjen.
As a consequence, the holder of a diploma certifying successful completion of training at post-secondary level of a duration of at least one year should be permitted access to a regulated profession in a Member State where access is contingent upon possession of a diploma certifying successful completion of higher or university education of four years' duration, regardless of the level to which the diploma required in the host Member State belongs.
Posledično imajo imetniki diplom, ki dokazujejo uspešno dokončanje usposabljanja na stopnji, ki presega srednjo stopnjo in traja vsaj eno leto, pravico dostopa do reguliranih poklicev v državi članici, v kateri je tak dostop omogočen na podlagi diplome, ki dokazuje uspešno dokončanje štiriletnega visokošolskega ali univerzitetnega študija, ne glede to, v katero stopnjo ta diploma spada v državi članici gostiteljici.
Conversely, where access to a regulated profession is contingent upon successful completion of higher or university education of more than four years, such access should be permitted only to holders of a diploma certifying successful completion of higher or university education of at least three years' duration.
Nasprotno pa je v primerih, ko je dostop do reguliranih poklicev pogojen z uspešnim dokončanjem visokošolskega ali univerzitetnega študija, ki traja več kot štiri leta, ta dostop omogočen le imetnikom diplom, ki dokazujejo uspešno dokončanje visokošolskega ali univerzitetnega študija, ki traja najmanj tri leta.
In the absence of harmonisation of the minimum training conditions for access to the professions governed by the general system, it should be possible for the host Member State to impose a compensation measure.
V primeru, da minimalni pogoji usposobljenosti za dostop do poklicev, ki jih ureja splošni sistem, niso usklajeni, je treba državam članicam gostiteljicam omogočiti, da uvedejo dopolnilni ukrep.
This measure should be proportionate and, in particular, take account of the applicant's professional experience.
Ta ukrep mora biti sorazmeren in mora zlasti upoštevati prosilčeve poklicne izkušnje.
Experience shows that requiring the migrant to choose between an aptitude test or an adaptation period offers adequate safeguards as regards the latter's level of qualification, so that any derogation from that choice should in each case be justified by an imperative requirement in the general interest.
Izkušnje kažejo, da z zahtevo, naj migrant izbere preizkus poklicne usposobljenosti ali prilagoditveno obdobje, zagotovimo ustrezne varovalne ukrepe glede njegove ravni kvalifikacij, tako da je treba kakršno koli odstopanje od te izbire vedno utemeljiti z nujno zahtevo, ki je v splošnem interesu.
Professional associations which are in a position to submit common platforms should be representative at national and European level.
Poklicna združenja, ki lahko predložijo skupna izhodišča, morajo biti zastopana na nacionalni in evropski ravni.
A common platform is a set of criteria which make it possible to compensate for the widest range of substantial differences which have been identified between the training requirements in at least two thirds of the Member States including all the Member States which regulate that profession.
Skupno izhodišče je sklop meril, ki omogoča uskladitev vseh pomembnih razlik, ugotovljenih v zahtevah usposobljenosti v vsaj dveh tretjinah držav članic, vključno z vsemi državami članicami, ki regulirajo ta poklic.
These criteria could, for example, include requirements such as additional training, an adaptation period under supervised practice, an aptitude test, or a prescribed minimum level of professional practice, or combinations thereof.
Ta merila bi lahko na primer zajemala zahteve, kot so dodatno izobraževanje, prilagoditveno obdobje pod nadzorom, preizkus poklicne usposobljenosti ali predpisana minimalna raven poklicnih izkušenj ali kombinacija teh.
In order to take into account all situations for which there is still no provision relating to the recognition of professional qualifications, the general system should be extended to those cases which are not covered by a specific system, either where the profession is not covered by one of those systems or where, although the profession is covered by such a specific system, the applicant does not for some particular and exceptional reason meet the conditions to benefit from it.
Da bi upoštevali vse primere, za katere še vedno ni določb o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij, je treba splošni sistem razširiti na tiste primere, ki jih ne zajema posebni sistem, bodisi kadar poklic ni zajet v enega od teh sistemov bodisi kadar je poklic zajet v tak poseben sistem, vendar prosilec zaradi posebnega ali izjemnega razloga ne izpolnjuje pogojev, da bi sistem veljal zanj.
There is a need to simplify the rules allowing access to a number of industrial, commercial and craft activities, in Member States where those professions are regulated, in so far as those activities have been pursued for a reasonable and sufficiently recent period of time in another Member State, while maintaining for those activities a system of automatic recognition based on professional experience.
Pravila, ki dovoljujejo dostop do vrste industrijskih, trgovinskih in obrtnih dejavnosti, je treba v državah članicah, kjer so ti poklici regulirani, če so se te dejavnosti opravljale ustrezno dolgo v drugi državi članici, poenostaviti, hkrati pa ohraniti za te dejavnosti sistem avtomatičnega priznavanja, ki temelji na poklicnih izkušnjah.
Freedom of movement and the mutual recognition of the evidence of formal qualifications of doctors, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives, pharmacists and architects should be based on the fundamental principle of automatic recognition of the evidence of formal qualifications on the basis of coordinated minimum conditions for training.
Prost pretok in vzajemno priznavanje dokazil o formalnih kvalifikacijah zdravnikov, medicinskih sester za splošno zdravstveno nego, zobozdravnikov, veterinarjev, babic, farmacevtov in arhitektov mora temeljiti na osnovnem načelu avtomatičnega priznavanja dokazil o formalnih kvalifikacijah na podlagi usklajenih minimalnih pogojev usposobljenosti.
In addition, access in the Member States to the professions of doctor, nurse responsible for general care, dental practitioner, veterinary surgeon, midwife and pharmacist should be made conditional upon the possession of a given qualification ensuring that the person concerned has undergone training which meets the minimum conditions laid down.
Poleg tega je treba v državah članicah dostop do poklicev zdravnika, medicinske sestre za splošno zdravstveno nego, zobozdravnika, veterinarja, babice in farmacevta pogojevati z določeno kvalifikacijo in s tem zagotoviti, da je taka oseba opravila usposabljanje, ki izpolnjuje določene minimalne pogoje.
This system should be supplemented by a number of acquired rights from which qualified professionals benefit under certain conditions.
Ta sistem je treba dopolniti z določenim številom pridobljenih pravic, ki jih lahko usposobljeni strokovnjaki uresničujejo pod določenimi pogoji.
To allow for the characteristics of the qualification system for doctors and dentists and the related acquis communautaire in the area of mutual recognition, the principle of automatic recognition of medical and dental specialities common to at least two Member States should continue to apply to all specialities recognised on the date of adoption of this Directive.
Da bi upoštevali posebnosti izobraževalnega sistema zdravnikov in zobozdravnikov ter ustreznega pravnega reda Skupnosti na področju vzajemnega priznavanja, bi se načelo avtomatičnega priznavanja zdravniških in zobozdravniških specializacij, ki so skupne vsaj dvema državama članicama, moralo še naprej uporabljati za vse specializacije, priznane na dan sprejetja te direktive.
To simplify the system, however, automatic recognition should apply after the date of entry into force of this Directive only to those new medical specialities common to at least two fifths of Member States.
Toda pri prizadevanjih za poenostavitev sistema naj se avtomatično priznavanje uporablja po datumu začetka veljavnosti te direktive le za tiste nove zdravniške specializacije, ki so skupne vsaj dvema petinama držav članic.
Moreover, this Directive does not prevent Member States from agreeing amongst themselves on automatic recognition for certain medical and dental specialities common to them but not automatically recognised within the meaning of this Directive, according to their own rules.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne ovira držav članic, da se med seboj dogovorijo o avtomatičnem priznavanju nekaterih skupnih zdravniških in zobozdravniških specializacij, ki se po tej direktivi ne priznavajo avtomatično, v skladu z lastnimi pravili.
Automatic recognition of formal qualifications of doctor with basic training should be without prejudice to the competence of Member States to associate this qualification with professional activities or not.
Avtomatično priznavanje formalnih kvalifikacij zdravnikov z osnovno usposobljenostjo ne sme vplivati na pristojnost držav članic, da te kvalifikacije povežejo s poklicnimi dejavnostmi ali ne.
All Member States should recognise the profession of dental practitioner as a specific profession distinct from that of medical practitioner, whether or not specialised in odontostomatology.
Vse države članice morajo priznati poklic zobozdravnika kot poseben poklic, ločen od poklica zdravnika, ne glede na to, ali je specializiran iz stomatologije.
Member States should ensure that the training given to dental practitioners equips them with the skills needed for prevention, diagnosis and treatment relating to anomalies and illnesses of the teeth, mouth, jaws and associated tissues.
Države članice morajo zagotoviti, da zobozdravniki med usposabljanjem pridobijo veščine, potrebne za preprečevanje, diagnosticiranje in zdravljenje nepravilnosti in bolezni zobovja, ustne votline, čeljusti in s tem povezanih tkiv.
The professional activity of the dental practitioner should be carried out by holders of a qualification as dental practitioner set out in this Directive.
Zobozdravniško poklicno dejavnost morajo opravljati osebe, ki imajo zobozdravniške kvalifikacije, določene v tej direktivi.
It did not appear desirable to lay down standardised training for midwives for all the Member States.
Zdi se, da ni zaželeno, da se določi standardizirano usposabljanje za babice v vseh državah članicah.
Rather, the latter should have the greatest possible freedom to organise their training.
Nasprotno, državam članicam bi bilo treba zagotoviti čim več svobode pri organizaciji usposabljanja.
With a view to simplifying this Directive, reference should be made to the concept of ‘pharmacist’ in order to delimit the scope of the provisions relating to the automatic recognition of the qualifications, without prejudice to the special features of the national regulations governing those activities.
Z namenom poenostavitve te direktive se je v njej treba sklicevati na pojem „farmacevt“ in tako omejiti področje določb, povezanih z avtomatičnim priznavanjem kvalifikacij, brez poseganja v posebne značilnosti nacionalnih predpisov, ki urejajo te dejavnosti.
Holders of qualifications as a pharmacist are specialists in the field of medicines and should, in principle, have access in all Member States to a minimum range of activities in this field.
Osebe s kvalifikacijami farmacevta so specialisti s področja zdravil in bi načeloma morali imeti dostop do minimalnega obsega dejavnosti na tem področju v vseh državah članicah.
In defining this minimum range, this Directive should neither have the effect of limiting the activities accessible to pharmacists in the Member States, in particular as regards medical biology analyses, nor create a monopoly for those professionals, as this remains a matter solely for the Member States.
Pri določitvi tega minimalnega obsega ta direktiva ne sme omejevati dejavnosti, dostopnih farmacevtom v državah članicah, zlasti kar zadeva biomedicinske analize, niti ustvarjati monopola, saj naj bi to ostalo izključno v pristojnosti držav članic.
The provisions of this Directive are without prejudice to the possibility for the Member States to impose supplementary training conditions for access to activities not included in the coordinated minimum range of activities.
Določbe te direktive ne posegajo v možnost držav članic, da uvedejo dodatne pogoje usposobljenosti za dostop do dejavnosti, ki niso vključene v usklajeni minimalni obseg dejavnosti.
This means that the host Member State should be able to impose these conditions on the nationals who hold qualifications which are covered by automatic recognition within the meaning of this Directive.
To pomeni, da bi morala država članica gostiteljica imeti možnosti, da uvede te pogoje za državljane s kvalifikacijami, zajetimi v avtomatično priznavanje v smislu te direktive.
This Directive does not coordinate all the conditions for access to activities in the field of pharmacy and the pursuit of these activities.
Ta direktiva ne usklajuje vseh pogojev za dostop do in opravljanje lekarniške dejavnosti.
In particular, the geographical distribution of pharmacies and the monopoly for dispensing medicines should remain a matter for the Member States.
Države članice bi morale ohraniti pristojnost zlasti glede geografske porazdelitve lekarn in monopola za izdajanje zdravil.