natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to promote the production of high-quality short flax and hemp fibres, the aid is granted to fibres containing a maximum of 7,5 % of impurities and shives.
Za pospeševanje proizvodnje visokokakovostnih kratkih lanenih in konopljenih vlaken, se pomoč dodeli za vlakna, ki vsebujejo največ 7,5 % nečistoč in pezdirja.
However, Member States may derogate from this limit and grant processing aid for short flax fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5 % and 15 % and for hemp fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5 % and 25 %.
Vendar pa lahko države članice odstopajo od te meje in dodelijo pomoč za predelavo kratkih lanenih vlaken, ki vsebujejo med 7,5 % in 15 % nečistoč in pezdirja, ter konopljenih vlaken, ki vsebujejo med 7,5 % in 25 % nečistoč in pezdirja.
Since this possibility is open only until the 2005/2006 marketing year, it is necessary to give Member States the possibility to derogate from that limit for two more marketing years.
Ker imajo države članice to možnost samo do tržnega leta 2005/2006, je treba državam članicam podaljšati možnost odstopanja od te meje še za dve tržni leti.
In order to continue to ensure reasonable production levels in each Member State, it is necessary to extend the period in which the national guaranteed quantities apply.
Treba je podaljšati obdobje veljavnosti uporabe količin, ki jih določijo države, da se še naprej zagotovi primerna stopnja proizvodnje v vsaki državi članici.
Additional aid has been supporting the continuation of traditional production of flax in certain regions of the Netherlands, Belgium and France.
Z dodatno pomočjo se je podpiralo nadaljevanje tradicionalne proizvodnje lanu v nekaterih regijah na Nizozemskem, v Belgiji in Franciji.
It is necessary to extend this transitional aid until the 2007/2008 marketing year, in order to continue enabling gradual adaptation of farm structures to the new market conditions.
Za nadaljnje omogočanje postopnega prilagajanja kmetijskih struktur novim tržnim razmeram je nujno to tradicionalno pomoč podaljšati do tržnega leta 2007/2008.
The Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council in sufficient time before the beginning of the 2008/2009 marketing year in order to assess whether the present system needs to be adapted or should continue.
Komisija bi morala Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo v zadostnem času pred začetkom tržnega leta 2008/2009, da se lahko oceni, ali je treba sedanji sistem prilagoditi ali se lahko nadaljuje.
Article 52 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers [3] provides that only hemp grown for fibre is eligible for the single payment scheme established under Title III of that Regulation.
Člen 52 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete [3] določa, da je samo konoplja, ki se jo goji za vlakna, upravičena do sheme enotnega plačila iz Naslova III navedene Uredbe.
It is appropriate to make the cultivation of hemp for other industrial uses also eligible.
Primerno je določiti, da je upravičena tudi konoplja za druge industrijske uporabe.
Taking account of the yearly management of direct payments, it is appropriate that the modifications to the eligibility conditions of the single payment scheme apply from 1 January 2007.
Ob upoštevanju letnega upravljanja direktnih plačil je primerno, da se spremembe o pogojih upravičenosti do sheme enotnega plačila uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2007.
Regulations (EC) No 1673/2000 and (EC) No 1782/2003 should be amended accordingly,
Uredbi (ES) št. 1673/2000 in (ES) št. 1782/2003 bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1673/2000 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1673/2000 se spremeni:
in Article 2, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 2 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z:
The amount of processing aid per tonne of fibre shall be fixed as follows:
Vsota pomoči za predelavo na tono vlaken se določi, kot sledi:
for long flax fibre:
za dolga lanena vlakna:
EUR 100 for the 2001/2002 marketing year,
100 EUR za tržno leto 2001/2002,
EUR 160 for the 2002/2003 to 2007/2008 marketing years,
160 EUR za tržna leta od 2002/2003 do 2007/2008,
EUR 200 from the 2008/2009 marketing year onwards,
200 EUR od tržnega leta 2008/2009 dalje;
for short flax fibre and hemp fibre containing not more than 7,5 % impurities and shives: EUR 90 for the 2001/2002 to 2007/2008 marketing years.
za kratka lanena in konopljena vlakna, ki vsebujejo največ 7,5 % nečistoč in pezdirja: 90 EUR za tržna leta od 2001/2002 do 2007/2008.
However, for the 2001/2002 to 2007/2008 marketing years, the Member State may, with reference to traditional outlets, also decide to grant aid:
Vendar pa se sme država članica glede na tradicionalne trge od tržnega leta 2001/2002 do 2007/2008 prav tako odločiti, da odobri pomoč:
for short flax fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5 % and 15 %,
za kratka lanena vlakna, katerih odstotek nečistoč in pezdirja je med 7,5 % in 15 %,
for hemp fibre containing a percentage of impurities and shives of between 7,5 % and 25 %.
za konopljena vlakna, katerih odstotek nečistoč in pezdirja je med 7,5 % in 25 %.
In the cases provided for in the second subparagraph, the Member State shall grant the aid in respect of a quantity which amounts to not more than the quantity produced, on the basis of 7,5 % of impurities and shives.’;
V primerih iz drugega pododstavka država članica odobri pomoč za količino, ki ni večja od proizvedene količine, na podlagi 7,5 % nečistoč in pezdirja.“
in Article 3(2), the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 3(2) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z:
‘The national guaranteed quantities for short flax fibre and hemp fibre shall cease to apply from the 2008/2009 marketing year.’;
„Nacionalne zajamčene količine za kratka lanena vlakna in konopljena vlakna se od tržnega leta 2008/2009 dalje ne uporabljajo več.“
in the first paragraph of Article 4, ‘2005/2006’ shall be replaced by ‘2007/2008’;
V prvem odstavku člena 4 se letnica „2005/2006“ zamenja z letnico „2007/2008“.
Article 12 shall be deleted;
Člen 12 se črta.
the following paragraph shall be added to Article 15:
V členu 15 se doda naslednji odstavek:
The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, if necessary accompanied by proposals, in sufficient time to allow the implementation of the proposed measures during the 2008/2009 marketing year.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo, po potrebi skupaj s predlogi, dovolj zgodaj, da se omogoči izvajanje predlaganih ukrepov v tržnem letu 2008/2009.
The report shall assess the impact of processing aid on producers, the processing industry and the market for textile fibres.
V poročilu se oceni vpliv pomoči za predelavo na proizvajalce, predelovalno industrijo in trg tekstilnih vlaken.
It shall examine the possibility of extending processing aid for short flax fibre and hemp fibre and additional aid beyond the 2007/2008 marketing year, as well as the possibility of integrating this aid scheme in the general framework of support for farmers under the common agricultural policy laid down by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003.’
Prouči se možnost podaljšanja pomoči za predelavo za kratka lanena vlakna in konopljena vlakna ter dodatne pomoči po tržnem letu 2007/2008 kot tudi možnost vključitve te sheme pomoči v splošni okvir podpore za kmete v okviru skupne kmetijske politike, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003.“
Article 52 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 52 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 se nadomesti z:
In case of production of hemp, the varieties used shall have a tetrahydrocannabinol content not exceeding 0,2 %.
V proizvodnji konoplje pri uporabljenih sortah vsebnost tetrahidrokanabinola ne sme presegati 0,2 %.
Member States shall establish a system for verifying the tetrahydrocannabinol content of the crops grown on at least 30 % of the areas on hemp.
Države članice vzpostavijo sistem preverjanja vsebnosti tetrahidrokanabinola pri poljščinah na vsaj 30 % površin, ki so posejane s konopljo.
However, if a Member State introduces a system of prior approval for such cultivation, the minimum shall be 20 %.
Če pa država članica uvede sistem predhodne odobritve za tako gojenje, se preverjanje opravi na vsaj 20 % površin s konopljo.
In accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 144(2), the granting of payments shall be made subject to the use of certified seeds of certain varieties.’
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 144(2) je dodelitev plačil pogojena z uporabo certificiranih semen nekaterih sort.“
It shall apply as of the date of entry into force, with the exception of Article 2 which shall apply from 1 January 2007.
Uporablja se od dneva začetka veljave, razen člena 2, ki se uporablja od 1. januarja 2007.
Regulation as last amended by the 2005 Act of Accession.
Uredba, kakor je nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 954/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 954/2006
imposing definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2320/97 and (EC) No 348/2000, terminating the interim and expiry reviews of the anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel originating, inter alia, in Russia and Romania and terminating the interim reviews of the anti-dumping duties on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel originating, inter alia, in Russia and Romania and in Croatia and Ukraine
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Romunije, Rusije in Ukrajine, o razveljavitvi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 2320/97 in (ES) št. 348/2000, o zaključku vmesnih pregledov in pregledov zaradi izteka protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije in Romunije ter o zaključku vmesnih pregledov protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije in Romunije ter Hrvaške in Ukrajine
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8, 9, 11(2) and (3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 8, člena 9 in člena 11(2) in (3) Uredbe,
On 31 March 2005, the Commission announced by a notice (‘notice of initiation’), published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the Community of certain seamless pipes and tubes (‘SPT’), of iron or steel (‘extended product scope’) originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine and the initiation of two interim reviews of the anti-dumping duties on imports of SPT of iron or non-alloy steel (‘original product scope’) originating, inter alia, in Russia and Romania and in Croatia and Ukraine.
Komisija je 31. marca 2005 z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“), objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2], objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom določenih brezšivnih cevi („BC“) iz železa ali jekla („razširjeni obseg izdelka“) s poreklom iz Hrvaške, Romunije, Rusije in Ukrajine ter začetek dveh vmesnih pregledov protidampinških dajatev na uvoz BC iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla („prvotni obseg izdelka“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije, Romunije oziroma Hrvaške in Ukrajine.
The anti-dumping proceeding was initiated following a complaint lodged on 14 February 2005 by the Defence Committee of the Seamless Steel Tube Industry of the European Union (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of the extended product scope.
Protidampinški postopek je bil uveden po vložitvi pritožbe Zaščitnega odbora industrije brezšivnih jeklenih cevi Evropske unije („pritožnika“) 14. februarja 2005 v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti razširjenega obsega izdelka.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting there from, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of a proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu tega izdelka in znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo, da se upraviči začetek postopka.
The interim reviews were initiated by the Commission on its own initiative, pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, in order to allow for any amendment or repeal necessary for the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 [3] and Council Regulation (EC) No 348/2000 [4] on imports of the original product scope from, inter alia, Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine (‘the definitive measures’).
Komisija je vmesna pregleda začela na lastno pobudo v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, da bi omogočila vse potrebne spremembe ali razveljavitev dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov, uvedenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2320/97 [3] in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 348/2000 [4] na uvoz prvotnega obsega izdelka iz, med drugim, Hrvaške, Romunije, Rusije in Ukrajine („dokončni ukrepi“).
The necessary amendment or repeal may arise, should it be determined that measures are to be imposed on the extended product scope, due to the fact that the products upon which measures have been imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 and Regulation (EC) No 348/2000, fall within the extended product scope.
Potreba po spremembi ali razveljavitvi lahko nastane, če se določi, da je treba ukrepe uvesti za razširjeni obseg izdelkov, ker se izdelki, za katere so bili z Uredbo (ES) št. 2320/97 in Uredbo (ES) št. 348/2000 uvedeni ukrepi, uvrščajo v razširjen obseg izdelkov.
Measures in force on the original product scope
Obstoječi ukrepi za prvotni obseg izdelka
Regulation (EC) No 2320/97 imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of the original product scope originating, inter alia, in Romania and Russia.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2320/97 so bile uvedene protidampinške dajatve na uvoz prvotnega obsega izdelka s poreklom, med drugim, iz Romunije in Rusije.
By Commission Decisions 97/790/EC [5] and 2000/70/EC [6], undertakings were accepted from exporters in, inter alia, Romania and Russia.
S sklepoma Komisije 97/790/ES [5] in 2000/70/ES [6] so bile sprejete zaveze izvoznikov, med drugim, iz Romunije in Rusije.
By Council Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004 [7], it was decided to no longer apply the measures in force on imports of the original product scope from Romania and Russia as a matter of prudence in connection with an anti-competitive behaviour of certain Community producers in the past (see recital (9) et seq. of that Regulation).
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1322/2004 [7] je bilo sklenjeno, da se iz previdnosti, da ne bi ponovno prišlo do protikonkurenčnega ravnanja nekaterih proizvajalcev Skupnosti (glej uvodno izjavo (9) in naslednje izjave Uredbe (ES) št. 1322/2004), ukine uporaba veljavnih ukrepov za uvoz prvotnega obsega izdelka s poreklom iz Romunije in Rusije.
Recital (20) of the same Regulation confirmed the interim and expiry reviews, initiated by a Notice of initiation in November 2002 [8], to be still ongoing until new findings would be available to permit an assessment for the future on the basis of new data that could in any event not be affected by the anti-competitive conduct.
V uvodni izjavi (20) iste uredbe je zapisano, da vmesni pregledi in pregledi zaradi izteka ukrepa, uvedeni z obvestilom o začetku v mesecu novembru 2002 [8], še vedno potekajo, dokler ne bodo na voljo nove ugotovitve, ki bi v prihodnosti omogočile oceno na podlagi novih podatkov, za katere je jasno, da niso bili pod vplivom protikonkurenčnega ravnanja.
Following a review investigation carried out in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005 [9], amended the definitive measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 348/2000, repealed the possibility of exemption from the duties provided for in Article 2 of the same Regulation and imposed an anti-dumping duty of 38,8 % on imports of the original product scope from Croatia and an anti-dumping duty of 64,1 % on imports of the original product scope from Ukraine with the exception of imports from Dnepropetrovsk Tube Works (‘DTW’) which are subject to an anti-dumping duty of 51,9 %.
Po preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, izvedeni v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/2005 [9] spremenil dokončne ukrepe, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 348/2000, razveljavil možnost oprostitve dajatev iz člena 2 iste uredbe in uvedel protidampinško dajatev v višini 38,8 % na uvoz izdelka iz prvotnega obsega iz Hrvaške in protidampinško dajatev v višini 64,1 % na uvoz izdelka iz prvotnega obsega iz Ukrajine, razen na uvoz družbe Dnipropetrovsk Tube Works („DTW“), ki je zavezana plačilu protidampinške dajatve v višini 51,9 %.
By Decision 2005/133/EC [10], the Commission partially suspended the definitive measures for a period of nine months, with effect from 18 February 2005.
S Sklepom 2005/133/ES [10] je Komisija delno opustila dokončne ukrepe za devet mesecev z veljavnostjo od 18. februarja 2005.
The partial suspension was extended for a further period of one year by Council Regulation (EC) No 1866/2005 [11].
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1866/2005 [11] je bila delna opustitev podaljšana za eno leto.
Therefore, the duties in force are those established by Regulation (EC) No 348/2000, i.e. 23 % for Croatia and 38,5 % for Ukraine.
Zato so veljavne dajatve tiste, ki so bile uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 348/2000, tj. 23 % za Hrvaško in 38,5 % za Ukrajino.
Given the need to further examine certain aspects of the investigation and also because of the interrelation with the interim and expiry reviews, referred to in section 1.2 above, it was decided to continue the investigation without the imposition of provisional measures.
Glede na potrebo po nadaljnji proučitvi nekaterih vidikov preiskave in zaradi medsebojnega razmerja z vmesnimi pregledi in pregledi zaradi izteka ukrepa iz oddelka 1.2. zgoraj je bilo sklenjeno, da se preiskava nadaljuje brez uvedbe začasnih ukrepov.
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, the importers/traders, users, suppliers and associations known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting countries concerned and the complainant Community producers and other Community producers known to be concerned of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je o začetku postopka uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike na Hrvaškem, v Romuniji, Rusiji in Ukrajini, uvoznike/trgovce, uporabnike, dobavitelje in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic in proizvajalce pritožnike Skupnosti ter druge proizvajalce Skupnosti, za katere je znano, da jih začetek postopka zadeva.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit-set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo Komisijo za zaslišanje v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the large number of Russian and Ukrainian exporting producers listed in the complaint, the large number of Community importers of the product concerned and the large number of Community producers supporting the complaint, the notice of initiation envisaged the use of sampling for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi pričakovanega velikega števila ruskih in ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, navedenih v pritožbi, uvoznikov Skupnosti zadevnega izdelka in proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki podpirajo pritožbo, je bilo v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe v obvestilu o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za ugotovitev dampinga in škode.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all Russian and Ukrainian exporting producers, Community importers and Community producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period (1 January 2004 to 31 December 2004).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in da bi v tem primeru lahko izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi ruski in ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki Skupnosti in proizvajalci Skupnosti pozvani, da se javijo Komisiji in predložijo osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju preiskave (od 1. januarja 2004 do 31. decembra 2004), kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku.
Sampling of exporters/producers
Vzorčenje izvoznikov/proizvajalcev
After examination of the information submitted by the Russian and Ukrainian exporting producers and due to the fact that in both countries the majority of companies belong to large producer groups, it was decided that sampling was not necessary with regard to Russia and Ukraine.
Po proučitvi informacij, ki so jih predložili ruski in ukrajinski proizvajalci izvozniki, in ker je v obeh državah večina družb v lasti velikih skupin proizvajalcev, je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje v zvezi z ruskimi in ukrajinskimi proizvajalci ni potrebno.
Sampling of Community industry and importers
Vzorčenje industrije Skupnosti in uvoznikov
With regard to Community producers, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, a sample was selected based on the largest representative volume of production and sales of Community producers, which can reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Glede proizvajalcev Skupnosti je Komisija v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec, ki je temeljil na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu proizvodnje in prodaje proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki ga je mogoče primerno proučiti v razpoložljivem času.
On the basis of the information received from Community producers, the Commission selected five companies located in four different Member States.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je Komisija prejela od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, je izbrala pet družb s sedežem v štirih različnih državah članicah.
One of the originally sampled Community producers did subsequently not cooperate and was replaced by another Community producer.
Eden od prvotno vzorčenih proizvajalcev Skupnosti pozneje ni sodeloval in ga je zamenjal drug proizvajalec Skupnosti.
In terms of production volume the five sampled companies represented 49 % of the total Community production.
Pet vzorčenih družb je predstavljalo 49 % celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation, the parties concerned were consulted and raised no objection.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe se je Komisija posvetovala z zadevnimi strankami, ki pa niso imele pripomb.
In addition, the remaining Community producers were requested to provide certain general data for the injury analysis.
Preostali proizvajalci Skupnosti so bili pozvani, da predložijo nekatere splošne podatke za proučitev škode.
In view of the small number of responses received by importers, it was decided that sampling of importers was not necessary.
Glede na malo število izpolnjenih vprašalnikov uvoznikov je bilo sklenjeno, da vzorčenje uvoznikov ni potrebno.
Market economy treatment/Individual treatment claim forms
Obrazci zahtevka za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo in individualno obravnavo