natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Production (kg)
Proizvodnja (v kg)
Capacity (kg)
Zmogljivost (v kg)
After an increase in output of 31 % in 2002, surpassing growth of Community consumption in relative terms, the production of the Community industry subsequently declined to remain since 2003 stable on a level 15 % higher than in 2001.
Po 31 % povečanju proizvedene količine leta 2002, ki je v relativnih vrednostih preseglo porabo Skupnosti, je proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti upadla in od leta 2003 ostala stabilna na ravni, ki je 15 % višja od ravni iz leta 2001.
It is noted that this level of increase lags behind the 24 % growth of Community consumption over the period considered.
Ugotovljeno je, da ta raven povečanja zaostaja za 24 % rastjo porabe Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
The production capacity of the Community industry, again with a peak in 2002, has increased by 24 %, reflecting the investments made by the sampled Community producers.
Proizvodna zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti, ki je doživela vrh leta 2002, se je povečala za 24 %, kar odraža naložbe v vzorcu zajetih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The capacity utilisation rate of the Community industry, after a slight improvement in 2002, subsequently decreased, overall by 7 % over the period considered.
Stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti je po rahlem izboljšanju leta 2002 upadla in je bila v obravnavanem obdobju skupaj 7 %.
Sales in the Community of the like product
Prodaja podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti
Volume (kg)
Obseg (v kg)
Average sales price (EUR/kg)
Povprečna prodajna cena (EUR/kg)
The sales volume of the Community industry increased by 7 % over the period considered.
Obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti se je v obravnavanem obdobju povečal za 7 %.
However, it should be noted that, after an increase by 22 % in 2002, the sales volume of the Community industry constantly decreased.
Vendar pa je treba omeniti, da je po 22 % povečanju leta 2002 obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti stalno upadal.
Moreover, this increase is significantly lower than the 24 % growth of Community consumption and by far lagging behind the 96 % increase of imports from the countries concerned over the period considered.
To povečanje je pravzaprav precej nižje od 24 % rasti porabe Skupnosti in precej zaostaja za 96 % povečanjem uvoza iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju.
Average sales prices of the Community industry increased by 6 % over the period considered.
Povprečne prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti so se v obravnavanem obdobju povečale za 6 %.
After a decrease by 13 % between 2001 and 2002, prices have been constantly increasing.
Po 13 % znižanju med letoma 2001 in 2002 so cene stalno rasle.
Over the period considered market share of the Community industry decreased by 14 %.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti zmanjšal za 14 %.
After an increase by 12 % between 2001 and 2002, the market share has been constantly decreasing.
Po 12 % povečanju med letoma 2001 in 2002 je tržni delež stalno upadal.
A comparison of the situation in the IP with 2002 reveals even a 26 % decline.
Primerjava razmer v obdobju preiskave z letom 2002 razkrije celo 26 % upad.
At the same time, the share of imports from the countries concerned increased strongly.
Hkrati se je močno povečal delež uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
As can be seen by the trends for production and sales volume in absolute terms, the Community industry experienced growth over the period considered, but still a decline since 2002.
Iz trendov proizvodnje in obsega prodaje v absolutnih vrednostih je razvidno, da je industrija Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju sicer zrasla, vendar je od leta 2002 še vedno upadala.
Furthermore, market share declined over the period considered, indicating that in relative terms, i.e. compared with competitors, the Community industry did not grow.
Poleg tega se je tržni delež v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal, kar relativno, tj. v primerjavi s tekmeci, kaže, da industrija Skupnosti ni rasla.
Profitability
2,7 %– Donosnost
Profitability Community industry
Donosnost industrije Skupnosti
Over the period considered profitability of the sampled Community producers improved.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je donosnost v vzorcu zajetih proizvajalcev Skupnosti izboljšala.
After making small profits in 2001, profitability decreased resulting in a loss-making situation in 2002.
Po rahlem dobičku leta 2001 se je donosnost zmanjšala, kar je imelo za posledico ustvarjanje izgub leta 2002.
Between 2002 and 2003 profitability improved, but the Community industry still remained loss-making.
Med letoma 2002 in 2003 se je donosnost izboljšala, vendar je industrija Skupnosti še naprej ustvarjala izgubo.
In the period 2003-IP the Community obtained its best profitability result over the period considered and achieved on average a profit margin of 4,3 %.
V obdobju 2003–OP je Skupnost dosegla svoj najboljši rezultat glede donosnosti v obravnavanem obdobju in 4,3 % povprečno stopnjo dobička.
This might appear at first sight positive but requires further evaluation in its proper context.
To se morda na prvi pogled zdi pozitivno, vendar zahteva nadaljnjo oceno v ustreznem kontekstu.
In fact, even in the IP the sampled Community producers on average did not achieve the minimum profit margin considered adequate and achievable in the absence of dumping, i.e. 5 % (see recital 178) and were remote from the profitability level the Community industry reached in 1995, i.e. 9,1 % [4] achieved before dumped imports arrived on the market.
Dejansko v vzorcu zajeti proizvajalci Skupnosti niti v obdobju preiskave niso dosegli minimalne stopnje dobička, ki velja za primerno in dosegljivo, če ne bi bilo dampinga, tj. 5 % (glej spodnjo uvodno izjavo 178), in so bili daleč od stopnje donosnosti, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti dosegla leta 1995, tj. 9,1 % [4], preden se je na trgu pojavil dampinški uvoz.
In addition, it is pertinent to consider that such improved profitability in the IP was (i) achieved at the expense of decreasing market share and (ii) essentially the result of a strong speculative increase of the price for the main cost driver, i.e. stainless steel.
Poleg tega je primerno upoštevati, da je bila takšna izboljšana donosnost v obdobju preiskave (i) dosežena na račun upadajočega tržnega deleža in (ii) predvsem rezultat močnega špekulativnega povečanja cene glavnega dejavnika, ki vpliva na stroške, tj. nerjavnega jekla.
The anticipated increase of stainless steel prices, enabled the Community industry to achieve higher prices for the like product, by using temporarily in their production stocks of comparatively cheap stainless steel procured before the speculative increase in price.
Pričakovano povečanje cen nerjavnega jekla je industriji Skupnosti omogočilo, da je dosegla višje cene za podoben izdelek, tako da je pri svoji proizvodnji začasno uporabila zaloge razmeroma poceni nerjavnega jekla, nabavljenega pred špekulativnim povečanjem cene.
However, this cost advantage was brought to an end once the existing stocks of raw material were used up and new steel had to be procured at significantly increased price levels.
Vendar pa se je ta stroškovna prednost končala, ko so bile zaloge surovin izčrpane in je bilo treba nabaviti novo jeklo po precej višjih cenah.
Furthermore, such speculative phase is generally not of a lasting nature and customers, notably large distributors with strong negotiating power, restart exercising severe price pressure again, once a stagnation or downturn of steel prices is perceived.
Poleg tega takšna špekulativna faza na splošno ni trajna in kupci, predvsem veliki distributerji s precejšnjo pogajalsko močjo, znova začnejo izvajati precejšen pritisk na cene, ko zaznajo zastoj ali padec cen jekla.
Consequently, the increased profitability is essentially due to very benevolent market conditions for the Community industry mainly in the second phase of the IP and not of a sustainable nature.
Zato je večjo donosnosti pripisati predvsem zelo ugodnim tržnim pogojem za industrijo Skupnosti, predvsem v drugi fazi obdobja preiskave, ki pa niso trajni.
Stocks (kg)
Zaloge (v kg)
The Community industry’s year-end stock levels strongly dropped by 52 % over the period considered.
Stopnje zalog industrije Skupnosti ob koncu leta so v obravnavanem obdobju močno upadle – za 52 %.
This can be explained by: (i) increased ‘on demand’ production (in that case stocks becomes of limited relevance) and (ii) a decrease in production since 2002.
To je mogoče razložiti: (i) s povečano proizvodnjo „na zahtevo“ (v tem primeru postanejo zaloge manj pomemben indikator) in (ii) z upadom proizvodnje od leta 2002.
From 2001 to 2003 the sampled Community producers continually increased their investments, in particular because of replacement of obsolete machinery and equipment.
Od leta 2001 do 2003 so v vzorcu zajeti proizvajalci Skupnosti stalno povečevali svoje naložbe, zlasti zaradi nadomestitve zastarelih strojev in opreme.
In the investigation period investment decreased by 35 % as compared to the beginning of the period considered.
V obdobju preiskave so se naložbe zmanjšale za 35 % v primerjavi z začetkom obravnavanega obdobja.
However, this decline in the IP can partially be explained by significant investments in previous years.
Vendar pa je ta upad v obdobju preiskave mogoče delno razložiti s precejšnjimi naložbami v prejšnjih letih.
Investments for the manufacture of the like product are necessary to maintain and improve competitiveness and improve environmental and security standards.
Naložbe za proizvodnjo podobnega izdelka so potrebne, da se ohrani in popravi konkurenčnost ter izboljšajo okoljski in varnostni standardi.
However, as already set out in the context of the profitability analysis, the improved profitability can largely be explained by special, non-lasting circumstances (speculative steel price development during the IP).
Kot je že bilo razloženo v okviru analize donosnosti, pa je boljšo donosnost v veliki meri mogoče razložiti s posebnimi, netrajnimi okoliščinami (razvoj špekulativnih cen jekla med OP).
Furthermore, the fact that part of the sampled Community producers increasingly used leased machinery for their production explains the relatively better performance of the return on investment indicator compared with the profitability indicator.
Poleg tega dejstvo, da je del v vzorcu zajetih proizvajalcev Skupnosti za svojo proizvodnjo vedno pogosteje uporabljal najete stroje, razloži relativno boljšo uspešnost kazalnika donosnosti naložb v primerjavi s kazalnikom donosnosti.
Although the cash flow of the sampled Community producers generated by the sales of the like product improved since 2002, over the period considered it decreased by 36 %.
Čeprav se je denarni tok, ki so ga v vzorcu zajeti proizvajalci Skupnosti ustvarili s prodajo podobnega izdelka, od leta 2002 izboljšal, se je ta v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 36 %.
The sampled Community producers did not experience any significant difficulty to raise capital as demonstrated by their ability to make investments during the period considered.
V vzorcu zajeti proizvajalci Skupnosti niso izkusili večjih težav s sposobnostjo zbiranja kapitala, kar dokazuje njihovo zmožnost investiranja med obravnavanim obdobjem.
Productivity (in kg per worker)
Produktivnost (v kg na delavca)
Labour cost EUR
Stroški dela v EUR
Labour cost EUR per employee
Stroški dela v EUR na zaposlenega
The Community industry increased employment in 2002.
V industriji Skupnosti se je zaposlenost v letu 2002 povečala.
However, subsequently employment constantly decreased, overall by 5 % over the period considered.
Vendar pa je pozneje stalno upadala, v obravnavanem obdobju skupaj za 5 %.
This negative development coincides with the reduced production since 2002.
Ta negativni razvoj dogodkov sovpada z zmanjšano proizvodnjo od leta 2002.
Productivity, as expressed in kg of production per worker, improved by 22 % over the period considered, indicating a determination and capability to maintain and improve competitiveness.
Produktivnost, izražena v kilogramih proizvodnje na delavca, se je v obravnavanem obdobju izboljšala za 22 %, kar kaže na odločenost in zmožnost ohranjanja in izboljševanja konkurenčnosti.
Wages per worker increased by 10 % over the period considered.
Plače na delavca so se v obravnavanem obdobju povečale za 10 %.
Such increase reflects rewards for improved productivity and compensation for inflation with regard to employees’ remuneration.
Takšno povečanje odraža nagrade za izboljšano produktivnost in kompenzacijo za inflacijo glede na plačila delavcem.
Furthermore, in absolute terms labour costs decreased since 2002.
Poleg tega so se absolutne vrednosti stroškov dela od leta 2002 zniževale.
Magnitude of dumping and recovery from past dumping
Obseg dampinga in premagovanje posledic preteklega dampinga
Given in particular the volume of dumped imports from the countries concerned, the margins of dumping found cannot be considered to be negligible.
Ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga predvsem ob upoštevanju obsega dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav ni mogoče obravnavati kot zanemarljivih.
Until the beginning of 2003, anti-dumping measures were in place with regard to imports of the product concerned from the PRC, India, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Thailand.
Protidampinški ukrepi na uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK, Indije, Republike Koreje, Tajvana in Tajske so veljali do začetka leta 2003.
However, the Community industry did not fully recover from past dumping, as in particular shown by the evolution of market share, sales volume and employment.
Vendar pa si industrija Skupnosti ni popolnoma opomogla od posledic preteklega dampinga, kar je posebej razvidno iz razvoja tržnega deleža, obsega prodaje in zaposlenosti.
This became particularly apparent after the expiry of the previous anti-dumping measures.
To je postalo še posebej očitno po poteku prejšnjih protidampinških ukrepov.
Over the period considered the Community industry increased production and sales volume, was able to reduce its stocks and it continually invested.
V obravnavanem obdobju je industrija Skupnosti povečala proizvodnjo in obseg prodaje, zmanjšala svoje zaloge in stalno investirala.
It did not experience difficulties to raise capital and improved productivity.
Ni imela težav z zbiranjem kapitala in izboljšala je produktivnost.
Labour costs in absolute terms decreased.
Absolutne vrednosti stroškov dela so se znižale.
Furthermore, the Community industry was able to increase its prices in the IP so as to improve its profitability and return on investment.
Poleg tega je industrija Skupnosti v OP povišala svoje cene, da je izboljšala svojo donosnost in donosnost naložb.
Yet, these positive aspects require evaluation in their context.
Vendar je treba te pozitivne vidike oceniti v kontekstu.
Higher prices and improved profitability were gained at the expense of significant losses in market share for the Community industry, i.e. 14 % over the period considered and even 26 % since 2002.
Višje cene in boljša donosnost so bile dosežene na račun precejšnjih izgub tržnega deleža za industrijo Skupnosti, tj. 14 % v obravnavanem obdobju in celo 26 % od leta 2002.
In particular, due to the availability of cheap dumped imports, customers opted for alternative sources of supply and the Community industry was not able to keep track.
Predvsem zaradi razpoložljivosti poceni dampinškega uvoza so se kupci odločali za druge vire dobave, čemur industrija Skupnosti ni bila zmožna slediti.
Furthermore, and in line with the findings on market share, over the period considered, growth in production (15 %) and sales volume (7 %) of the Community industry did not keep pace with the significantly more favourable development of consumption on the Community market (24 %).
Poleg tega, in v skladu z ugotovitvami o tržnem deležu, v obravnavanem obdobju rast proizvodnje (15 %) in obsega prodaje (7 %) industrije Skupnosti ni dohajala precej ugodnejšega razvoja porabe na trgu Skupnosti (24 %).
Employment in the Community industry dropped by 5 %, which, in fact, is the explanation for reduced labour costs.
Zaposlenost v industriji Skupnosti je upadla za 5 %, kar pravzaprav razloži nižje stroške dela.
In addition, the profitability situation for the sampled Community producers cannot, overall, be considered to be satisfactory.
Poleg tega tudi donosnosti v vzorcu zajetih proizvajalcev Skupnosti na splošno ni mogoče obravnavati kot zadovoljive.
For the most part of the period considered, it was clearly insufficient (losses or insufficient profit margin).
V večjem delu obravnavanega obdobja je bila očitno nezadostna (izgube ali nezadostna stopnja dobička).
Although profitability of the sampled Community producers improved in the IP (4,3 % profit margin), this (i) is still lagging behind the minimum margin of 5 % that the Community industry could be expected to obtain in the absence of injurious dumping and (ii) can largely be attributed to non-lasting effects of rising steel prices.
Čeprav se je donosnost v vzorcu zajetih proizvajalcev Skupnosti v OP povečala (4,3 % stopnja dobička), je to: (i) še vedno precej pod minimalno 5 % stopnjo, za katero je bilo mogoče pričakovati, da bi jo dosegla industrija Skupnosti, če ne bi bilo škodljivega dampinga, in (ii) v veliki meri mogoče pripisati netrajnim učinkom povečanja cen jekla.
The negative situation of the Community industry is further reflected in the picture displayed by the trend for cash flow.
Negativen položaj industrije Skupnosti je razviden tudi iz trenda denarnega toka.
As a result, overall the negative trend indicators outweigh the positive trends and it is provisionally concluded that the Community industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi tega negativni kazalniki trenda na splošno prevladajo nad pozitivnimi trendi, in začasno se sklene, da je industrija utrpela materialno škodo v smislu člena 3(1) osnovne uredbe.
CAUSATION
VZROK ŠKODE
According to Article 3(6) and (7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission has examined whether the dumped imports of the product concerned originating in the countries concerned have caused material injury to the Community industry.
V skladu s členoma 3(6) in 3(7) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila, ali je dampinški uvoz zadevnega izdelka, s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, povzročil materialno škodo industriji Skupnosti.
Known factors other than the dumped imports, which could at the same time be injuring the Community industry, were also examined to ensure that possible injury caused by these other factors was not attributed to the dumped imports.
Za zagotovitev, da dampinškemu uvozu ni bila pripisana možna škoda, ki so jo povzročili drugi dejavniki, so bili preučeni tudi ti drugi dejavniki, ki niso dampinški uvoz in bi lahko hkrati škodili panogi Skupnosti.
The countries concerned have, since 2003, strongly improved their market position.
Od leta 2003 so zadevne države močno izboljšale svoj položaj na trgu.
It can clearly be observed that their increase in market share by 58 % coincides with a decrease for the Community industry.
Jasno je opaziti, da njihovo 58 % povečanje tržnega deleža sovpada z zmanjšanjem deleža industrije Skupnosti.
Moreover, the import volume from the countries concerned (96 % increase) grew much stronger than the consumption on the Community market (24 %).
Poleg tega se je obseg uvoza iz zadevnih držav (96 % povečanje) povečal bolj kot poraba na trgu Skupnosti (24 %).
Finally, the average import price of the countries concerned was since 2003, as a consequence of unfair trade in the form of dumping following the expiry of the anti-dumping measures, significantly lower than the price level of the Community industry, thus exercising price pressure.
Kot posledica nepoštenega trgovanja v obliki dampinga po poteku protidampinških ukrepov je bila povprečna uvozna cena zadevnih držav od leta 2003 precej nižja od ravni cene industrije Skupnosti, ter je tako izvajala pritisk na cene.
It was therefore provisionally established that the dumped imports from the countries concerned had a considerable negative impact on the situation of the Community industry during the period considered, in particular in terms of market share and sales volume.
Zato je bilo začasno ugotovljeno, da je dampinški uvoz iz zadevnih držav v obravnavanem obdobju precej negativno vplival na položaj industrije Skupnosti, zlasti v smislu tržnega deleža in obsega prodaje.
Volume (in 000 kg)
Obseg (v 000 kg)
Average import price per kg (EUR)
Povprečna uvozna cena na kg (v EUR)
Imports of the product under consideration from countries, other than the countries concerned, decreased overall.
Uvoz obravnavanega proizvoda iz držav, ki niso zadevne države, je na splošno upadel.
In fact, the market share of such other imports declined by 20 % over the period considered.
Dejansko se je tržni delež takšnega drugega uvoza v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 20 %.
Furthermore, on average the import price of those other countries was significantly higher as compared with the price levels from the countries concerned.
Poleg tega je bila v povprečju uvozna cena teh drugih držav precej višja od ravni cen iz zadevnih držav.
Two exporters submitted that imports from India, the Republic of Korea and Norway would break any causal link that may exist between the material injury that might be sustained by the Community industry and the dumped imports from the countries concerned.
Dva izvoznika sta trdila, da bi uvoz iz Indije, Republike Koreje in Norveške prekinil vsako vzročno zvezo, ki bi lahko obstajala med materialno škodo, ki bi jo lahko utrpela industrija Skupnosti, in dampinškim uvozom iz zadevnih držav.
However, on the basis of the facts at hand, imports from the Republic of Korea (IP: 221 tonnes at 2,72 EUR/kg on average) and Norway (IP: 438 tonnes at 2,89 EUR/kg on average) can both in terms of their small volume and their price levels not explain the injury caused to the Community industry.
Vendar pa na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev uvoz iz Republike Koreje (OP: 221 ton po povprečno 2,72 EUR/kg) in Norveške (OP: 438 ton po povprečno 2,89 EUR/kg) glede na njun majhen obseg in ravni cen skupaj ne moreta razložiti škode, povzročene industriji Skupnosti.
It is further noted that imports from Norway decreased during the period considered by 36 %.
Upošteva se tudi, da se je uvoz iz Norveške v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšal za 36 %.
With regard to India though, it can be observed that starting in 2003 imports increased considerably (IP: 1147,6 tonnes) at low prices (average 1,91 EUR/kg).
Glede Indije je opaziti, da se je uvoz od leta 2003 precej povečal (OP: 1147,6 tone) po nizkih cenah (povprečno 1,91 EUR/kg).
It cannot be ruled out that in the IP those imports from India could have had a certain negative impact, in particular in terms of price pressure on the state of the Community industry.
Ni mogoče izključiti dejstva, da bi v OP ta uvoz iz Indije lahko nekoliko negativno vplival na položaj industrije Skupnosti zlasti v smislu pritiska na cene.
Yet, given the relatively small amount of the Indian import volume in comparison to the import volume from the countries concerned (27400 tonnes on average at 2,41 EUR/kg), it was concluded that the impact of the Indian imports (market share in the IP 1,4 %) was not such as to break the causal link of the dumped imports and the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Vendar pa je bilo glede na relativno majhno količino obsega uvoza iz Indije v primerjavi z obsegom uvoza iz zadevnih držav (povprečno 27400 ton po 2,41 EUR/kg) sklenjeno, da vpliv uvoza iz Indije (1,4 % tržni delež v obdobju preiskave) ni bil tolikšen, da bi lahko prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom in materialno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Imports from India in isolation cannot explain the significant loss of market share sustained by the Community industry and, in relation to the growth in consumption, its much less favourable increase of sales.
Sam uvoz iz Indije ne more razložiti precejšnje izgube tržnega deleža, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti, in, v zvezi z rastjo porabe, njenega precej manj ugodnega povečanja prodaje.