natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via such products, appropriate treatment must be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from.
Da se prepreči tveganje za prenos bolezni prek teh proizvodov, jih je treba primerno obdelati, obdelava pa je odvisna od zdravstvenega stanja v državi porekla in vrst, iz katerih je proizvod pridobljen.
It appears therefore appropriate, that imports of meat products of wild feathered game originating in Croatia and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product should continue to be authorised.
Zato se zdi primerno, da se še naprej dovoli uvoz proizvodov iz mesa pernate divjadi s poreklom iz Hrvaške, ki so bili obdelani pri temperaturi najmanj 70 °C v celotnem proizvodu.
Given the epidemiology situation in Croatia and neighbouring countries and the risk still posed by avian influenza, the protection measures provided for in this Decision should apply until 31 December 2006.
Glede na epidemiološke razmere na Hrvaškem in v sosednjih državah ter še vedno prisotno tveganje zaradi aviarne influence, je treba zaščitne ukrepe, ki jih določa ta določba, uporabljati do 31. decembra 2006.
For the sake of clarity and consistency of Community legislation, Decision 2005/758/EC should be repealed and replaced by this Decision.
Zaradi jasnosti in doslednosti zakonodaje Skupnosti je treba Odločbo 2005/758/ES razveljaviti in jo nadomestiti s to odločbo.
Member States shall suspend imports, from that part of the territory of Croatia referred to in the Annex to this Decision, of the following:
Države članice začasno ustavijo uvoz iz dela ozemlja Hrvaške, navedenega v Prilogi k tej odločbi, naslednjih proizvodov:
live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game, live birds other than poultry as defined in Article 1, third indent, of Commission Decision 2000/666/EC [6], including birds accompanying their owners (pet birds), and hatching eggs of these species;
žive perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi ter gojene pernate divjadi, živih ptic, ki niso perutnina, kakor so opredeljene v tretji alinei člena 1 Odločbe Komisije 2000/666/ES [6], vključno s pticami, ki spremljajo svoje lastnike (ljubiteljske vrste ptic), in valilnih jajc teh vrst;
meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game;
mesnih pripravkov in mesnih proizvodov, ki so sestavljeni iz mesa pernate divjadi ali ga vsebujejo;
raw pet food and unprocessed feed material containing any parts of wild feathered game; and
surove hrane za hišne živali in nepredelanih posamičnih krmil, ki vsebujejo katere koli dele pernate divjadi; ter
By way of derogation from point (c) of Article 1, Member States shall authorise the importation of meat preparations and meat products consisting of or containing meat of wild feathered game provided that the meat has undergone at least one of the specific treatments referred to under points B, C or D in Part 4 of Annex II to Decision 2005/432/EC.
Z odstopanjem od člena 1(c) države članice dovolijo uvoz mesnih pripravkov in mesnih proizvodov, ki so sestavljeni iz mesa pernate divjadi ali ga vsebujejo, pod pogojem, da je bilo meso teh vrst obdelano vsaj na enega od posebnih načinov obdelave iz točk B, C ali D dela 4 Priloge II k Odločbi 2005/432/ES.
Decision 2005/758/EC is repealed.
Odločba 2005/758/ES se razveljavi.
This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2006.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. decembra 2006.
Part of the territory of Croatia referred to in Article 1
Del ozemlja Hrvaške iz člena 1
In Croatia: all areas of the territory of Croatia for which the competent authorities of Croatia formally apply protection measures that are equivalent to those laid down in Decision 2006/115/EC.
Na Hrvaškem: vsa območja ozemlja Hrvaške, za katera pristojni organi Hrvaške uradno uporabljajo zaščitne ukrepe, ki so enakovredni ukrepom, določenim v Odločbi 2006/115/ES
concerning a questionnaire for Member States reports on the implementation of Directive 1999/13/EC during the period 2005-2007
o vprašalniku za poročila držav članic o izvajanju Direktive 1999/13/ES v obdobju 2005–2007
(notified under document number C(2006) 3274)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3274)
Having regard to Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 [1], on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/13/ES z dne 11. marca 1999 o omejevanju emisij hlapnih organskih spojin zaradi uporabe organskih topil v nekaterih dejavnostih in obratih [1], in zlasti člena 11(1) Direktive,
Pursuant to Article 11(1) of Directive 1999/13/EC, Member States are obliged to draw up reports on the implementation of that Directive on the basis of a questionnaire or outline drafted by the Commission.
V skladu s členom 11(1) Direktive 1999/13 morajo države članice sestaviti poročila o izvajanju navedene direktive na podlagi vprašalnika ali predloge, ki ju pripravi Komisija.
Member States have drawn up reports on the implementation of that Directive for the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2004 according to Commission Decision 2002/529/EC [2].
Države članice so sestavile poročila o izvajanju navedene direktive za obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2004 v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2002/529/ES [2].
The second report should cover the period 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007.
Drugo poročilo mora zajemati obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2007.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee in accordance with Article 6 of Council Directive 91/692/EEC [3],
Ukrepi v tej odločbi so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 6 Direktive Sveta 91/692/EGS [3] –
The Member States shall use the questionnaire set out in the Annex to this Decision for the purposes of drawing up the report, covering the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007, to be submitted to the Commission pursuant to Article 11(1) of Directive 1999/13/EC.
Države članice za namene sestavljanja poročila, ki zajema obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2007 in se predloži Komisiji v skladu s členom 11(1) Direktive 1999/13/ES, uporabijo vprašalnik iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 87).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/42/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str. 87).
Questionnaire on the implementation of Directive 1999/13/EC concerning the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations during the period 2005-2007
Vprašalnik o izvajanju Direktive 1999/13/ES o omejevanju emisij hlapnih organskih spojin zaradi uporabe organskih topil v nekaterih dejavnostih in obratih v obdobju 2005–2007
Guidance for answering the questions below:
Navodila za odgovarjanje na spodnja vprašanja:
Answers should be short and as accurate as possible.
Odgovori naj bodo kratki in čim bolj natančni.
The information submitted, in particular regarding the number of installations and the measures taken, may include representative data, provided that it is sufficient to demonstrate that the requirements of the Directive have been met.
Predložene informacije, zlasti glede števila obratov in sprejetih ukrepov, lahko vključujejo reprezentativne podatke, pod pogojem, da zadostujejo za potrditev izpolnjevanja zahtev Direktive.
For the reports covering periods preceding the dates set up in Article 4 of Directive 1999/13/EC, information regarding existing installations should be based on the best available estimations for those periods.
Za poročila, ki zajemajo obdobja pred datumi iz člena 4 Direktive 1999/13/ES, morajo informacije o obstoječih obratih temeljiti na najboljših razpoložljivih ocenah za navedena obdobja.
Reference can simply be made to previous answers, where the situation is unchanged, although this clearly will not be possible for Member States for which this represents the first reporting period.
Če se položaj ni spremenil, se lahko navede zgolj sklic na predhodni odgovor, čeprav to seveda ne bo mogoče za države članice, za katere je to obdobje prvo obdobje poročanja.
If there have been new developments, these should be described in a new answer.
Če je prišlo do novega razvoja, ga je treba opisati v novem odgovoru.
What are the main features of national legislation that are necessary to set up an authorisation or registration system to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Directive?
Katere so glavne značilnosti nacionalne zakonodaje, ki so potrebne za vzpostavitev sistema dovoljenj ali registracij, da se zagotovi skladnost z zahtevami Direktive?
Please detail changes in national legislation during the reporting period concerning Directive 1999/13/EC.
Prosimo, podrobno navedite spremembe v nacionalni zakonodaji v poročevalnem obdobju v zvezi z Direktivo 1999/13/ES.
Coverage of installations
Zajetje obratov
For each of the twenty sections of Annex II A, please estimate how many installations fall into the categories set out below (Member States with a different sector classification in their national legislation may use it in terms of answering this question):
Za vsakega od dvajsetih oddelkov Priloge IIA, prosimo, ocenite, koliko obratov spada v kategorije, opredeljene spodaj (države članice z drugačno sektorsko razvrstitvijo v nacionalni zakonodaji jo lahko uporabijo pri odgovarjanju na to vprašanje):
all existing installations, encompassed by Article 2(2) of the Directive, at the end of the reporting period,
vsi obstoječi obrati, vključeni s členom 2(2) Direktive, ob koncu poročevalnega obdobja,
all installations which were registered or authorised by the competent authority during the reporting period,
vsi obrati, ki so bili registrirani ali jim je obratovanje dovolil pristojni organ v poročevalnem obdobju,
Basic operator obligations
Osnovne obveznosti upravljavca
In general terms, what administrative provisions have been put into place to allow the competent authorities to ensure that installations operate in accordance with the general principles set out in Article 5?
Katere upravne določbe so bile izdane v splošnem, da se pristojnim organom omogoči, da zagotovijo delovanje obratov v skladu s splošnimi načeli iz člena 5?
Existing installations
Obstoječi obrati
How many existing installations are authorised or registered as using the reduction scheme of Annex II B, according to Article 4(3).
Koliko obstoječih obratov je dobilo dovoljenje ali je bilo registriranih za uporabo programa zmanjševanja emisij iz Priloge II B, v skladu s členom 4(3)?
All installations
Vsi obrati
Following Article 5(3)(a), Member States shall report to the Commission on the derogation concerning the application of fugitive emission limit values.
V skladu s členom 5(3)(a) države članice poročajo Komisiji o odstopanju v zvezi z uporabo mejnih vrednosti nezajetih emisij:
Have there been any derogations?
Je prišlo do odstopanj?
In these cases, how is it demonstrated that for the individual installation concerned this value was not technically and economically feasible?
Kako je v teh primerih dokazano, da za zadeven posamezen obrat ta vrednost tehnično ali ekonomsko ni bila mogoča?
How is it taken into account that significant risks to human health or the environment are not to be expected?
Kako se upošteva zahteva, da resna tveganja za zdravje ali okolje niso pričakovana?
Following Article 5(3)(b), activities which cannot be operated under contained conditions may be exempted from the controls of Annex II A when this possibility is explicitly mentioned in that Annex.
V skladu s členom 5(3)(b) se lahko dejavnosti, ki jih ni mogoče opravljati v zaprtih pogojih, izvzamejo iz mejnih vrednosti emisij iz priloge IIA, če je ta možnost posebej navedena v navedeni prilogi.
How many operators have used this possibility and for how many installations?
Koliko upravljavcev je uporabilo to možnost in za koliko obratov?
How is it demonstrated that the reduction scheme of Annex II B is not technically and economically feasible?
Kako je dokazano, da program zmanjševanja emisij iz Priloge IIB tehnično in ekonomsko ni izvedljiv?
How does the operator demonstrate for the respective installations that the best available technique is being used?
Kako upravljavec dokaže, da se v zadevnih obratih uporablja najboljša razpoložljiva tehnologija?
National plans
Nacionalni načrti
How many installations have been included under the national plan?
Koliko obratov je bilo vključenih v nacionalni načrt?
What is the emission reduction target which the plan will deliver?
Kakšno je ciljno zmanjšanje emisij, ki ga bo prinesel načrt?
What is the current overall emission for the installations covered by the plan?
Kakšna je trenutna skupna emisija obratov, ki so vključeni v načrt?
How does this compare with any interim reduction target falling within this reporting period?
Kakšna je v primerjavi s katerim koli vmesnim ciljem zmanjšanja znotraj tega poročevalnega obdobja?
Substitution
Nadomestitev
Following the provision of guidance by the Commission according to Article 7(1), to what extent has this been taken into account for the authorisation and formulation of general binding rules (see Article 7(2))?
V kakšnem obsegu se je na podlagi določbe o smernicah Komisije v skladu s členom 7(1) to upoštevalo pri izdajanju dovoljenj in oblikovanju splošnih zavezujočih predpisov (glej člen 7(2))?
In relation to Article 8(1), in the case where a Member State has introduced an annual reporting obligation for the operator to supply the competent authority with data for the purposes of verifying compliance with the Directive, please state how many operators have not supplied the competent authority with the necessary data and for how many installations?
Če je država članica v skladu s členom 8(1) obvezala upravljavca obrata, zajetega s to direktivo, da pristojnemu organu enkrat na leto ali na zahtevo sporoči podatke, ki pristojnemu organu omogočijo, da preveri skladnost s to direktivo, prosimo, navedite, koliko upravljavcev pristojnemu organu ni zagotovilo potrebnih podatkov in za koliko obratov.
What measures are taken by the competent authority to ensure that this information is supplied within the shortest possible time?
Katere ukrepe je sprejel pristojni organ za zagotovitev sporočanja teh informacij v najkrajšem možnem času?
In relation to Article 8(1), in the case where a Member State has introduced an ‘on request’ reporting obligation for the operator to supply the competent authority with data for the purposes of verifying compliance with the Directive, please state how many operators have supplied the competent authority with the necessary data and for how many installations?
Če je država članica v skladu s členom 8(1) obvezala upravljavca obrata, zajetega s to direktivo, da pristojnemu organu enkrat na leto ali na zahtevo sporoči podatke, ki pristojnemu organu omogočijo, da preveri skladnost s to direktivo, prosimo, navedite, koliko upravljavcev je pristojnemu organu zagotovilo potrebne podatke in za koliko obratov.
Without prejudice to Article 8(4) and in relation to Article 8(3), please state the number of installations with a non-continuous measurement frequency of more than one year?
Brez poseganja v člen 8(4) in v povezavi s členom 8(3), prosimo, navedite število obratov s pogostostjo občasnih meritev s presledki več kot eno leto.
In relation to Article 10,
V zvezi s členom 10:
how many operators have been found to have breached the requirements of this Directive?
Koliko upravljavcev je kršilo zahteve te direktive?
what measures are taken in order to restore compliance ‘within the shortest possible time’ pursuant to Article 10(a)?
Kateri ukrepi se sprejmejo, da se ponovno in v „najkrajšem možnem času“ vzpostavi skladnost s členom 10(a)?
how many times have the competent authorities suspended or withdrawn the authorisation in the case of non-compliance pursuant to Article 10(b)?
Kolikokrat so pristojni organi začasno preklicali ali odvzeli dovoljenje v primeru neskladnosti s členom 10(b)?
Compliance with emission limit values
Usklajenost z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij
Describe briefly practices to ensure compliance with the emission limit values in waste gases, fugitive emission values and total emission values.
Na kratko opišite dejavnosti za zagotovitev skladnosti z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij v odpadnih plinih, vrednostmi nezajetih emisij in skupnimi vrednostmi emisij.
Please, inform about examples of measures to ensure compliance applied during the period.
Prosimo, poročajte o primerih ukrepov za zagotovitev skladnosti, uporabljenih v obdobju.
What are, in general terms, the most common practices concerning regular on-site inspections by competent authorities?
Kateri so na splošno najbolj običajni postopki v zvezi z inšpekcijskimi pregledi na kraju samem, ki jih izvajajo pristojni organi?
In case those are not carried out, how do competent authorities verify the information provided by the operator?
V primeru, da se ti ne izvajajo, kako pristojni organi preverijo informacije, ki jih je posredoval upravljavec?
Reduction scheme
Program zmanjševanja emisij
What is the procedure to ensure that the reduction scheme proposed by the operator corresponds as closely as possible to the emissions which would have resulted if the emission limit values set out in Annex II of the Directive had been applied?
Kakšen je postopek za zagotovitev čim večjega ujemanja programa zmanjševanja emisij, ki ga je predlagal upravljavec, z emisijami, ki bi bile posledica uporabe mejnih vrednosti emisij iz Priloge II k Direktivi?
Please provide information about your experience with the application of the reduction scheme.
Prosimo, posredujte informacije o svojih izkušnjah z uporabo programa zmanjševanja emisij.
If you have used the reduction scheme proposed in Annex II B(2), please answer the following questions:
Če ste uporabljali program zmanjševanja emisij, predlagan v Prilogi II B(2), prosimo, odgovorite na naslednja vprašanja:
What procedures and practices are in place to calculate the annual reference emission?
Kateri postopki in prakse se uporabljajo za izračun letne referenčne emisije?
What procedures and practices are in place to calculate the emission target?
Kateri postopki in prakse se uporabljajo za izračun ciljne emisije?
What practices are in place to ensure that compliance with the target emission is achieved?
Katere prakse se uporabljajo za zagotovitev skladnosti s ciljno emisijo?
Answers may be brief and take the form of a summary.
Odgovori so lahko kratki in v obliki povzetka.
Solvent management plan
Načrt ravnanja s topili
According to Article 9, how is compliance by the operator demonstrated (solvent management plan or equivalent)?
Kako je bila v skladu s členom 9 dokazana usklajenost upravljavca (načrt ravnanja s topili ali drug enakovreden način)?
Public access to information
Dostop javnosti do informacij
What practices, in general terms, are in place to ensure the application of Article 12 on public access to information?
Katere prakse se v splošnem uporabljajo za zagotovitev uporabe člena 12 o dostopu javnosti do informacij?
Relationship with other community instruments
Povezava z drugimi instrumenti Skupnosti
How do Member States view the effectiveness of the Directive, inter alia, in comparison with other Community environmental instruments?
Kakšno je stališče držav članic o učinkovitosti Direktive, med drugim, v primerjavi z drugimi okoljskimi instrumenti Skupnosti?
OJ L 230, 12.9.2000, p. 16.
UL L 230, 12.9.2000, str. 16.
of the installations referred to in the previous indent, how many were authorised or registered pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Directive? (optional),
koliko obratov, navedenih v prejšnji alinei, je dobilo dovoljenje ali je bilo registriranih v skladu s členom 4(4) Direktive (neobvezno)?
how many of these installations are also covered by the IPPC Directive? (optional).
koliko teh obratov je zajetih v Direktivi IPPC (neobvezno)?.
Has the Member State decided to define and implement a National Plan according to Article 6? (see Commission Decision 2000/541/EC of 6 September 2000 on criteria for assessing national plans according to Article 6 of Council Directive 1999/13/EC [1]).
Se je država članica odločila, da opredeli in izvaja nacionalni načrt v skladu s členom 6 (glej Sklep Komisije 2000/541/ES z dne 6. septembra 2000 o merilih za presojo nacionalnih načrtov v skladu s členom 6 Direktive Sveta 1999/13/ES [1])?
on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Moldavijo na drugi strani, zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE IN KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI STA –
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union was signed on behalf of the European Communities and their Member States on 30 April 2004.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Moldavijo na drugi strani, zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji je bil v imenu Evropskih skupnosti in njunih držav članic podpisan 30. aprila 2004.
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community, the European Atomic Energy Community and the Member States.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Moldavijo na drugi strani, zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji se odobri v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in držav članic.
OJ C 174 E, 14.7.2005, p. 43.
UL C 174 E, 14.7.2005, str. 43.