natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Germany has only raised the possibility of jeopardy without showing that there are in fact producers who would suffer as a result of registration.
Nemčija je zgolj omenila možnost škode, ne da bi dokazala, da dejansko obstajajo proizvajalci, ki bi bili oškodovani zaradi registracije.
Finally, Germany argues that the use of the name Miel de Provence .is permitted under Council Directive 2001/110/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to honey [3] for honey from the French region of Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur.
Nenazadnje Nemčija utemeljuje, da je uporaba imena „Miel de Provence“ dovoljena po Direktivi Sveta 2001/110/ES z dne 20. decembra 2001 o medu [3] za med, ki izvira iz francoske regije Provansa-Alpe-Azurna obala.
It claims that this region is different from the geographical area covered by the specification drawn up under Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.
Ta regija naj bi bila drugačna od geografskega območja, ki ga zajema specifikacija, sestavljena v okviru Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92.
Also, the specification for the application for registration excludes honey made from sunflower, rape or lucerne (alfalfa), which are floral and plant origins present in the geographical area.
Poleg tega specifikacija vloge za registracijo izključuje med iz sončnic, oljne repice in lucerne, in ki je med iz cvetja in rastlin, navzočih na geografskem območju.
As a result, to comply with the specification, traders currently marketing this product under the name Miel de Provence will have to exclude honey of floral origin not provided for in the specification.
Zaradi tega in da bi spoštovali specifikacijo, bodo morali izvajalci, ki zdaj tržijo ta proizvod pod imenom „Miel de Provence“, izključiti med cvetličnega porekla, ki ni bil določen v specifikaciji.
According to Germany, registration of Miel de Provence under Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 would conflict with Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey.
Po nemškem mnenju bi, če bi bil med „Miel de Provence“ registriran v okviru Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92, to bilo v nasprotju z Direktivo 2001/110/ES o medu.
As pointed out in recital 8, the argument relating to the existence of jeopardy has not been proved.
Kakor je bilo navedeno v uvodni izjavi 8, razlog o obstoju škode ni dokazan.
In addition, the claimed infringement of Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey is not one of the reasons that can be used for objections under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92.
Poleg tega domnevna kršitev Direktive 2001/110/ES o medu ne spada k razlogom, na katere se lahko sklicuje pri ugovoru v skladu s členom 7(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92.
Also, Directive 2001/110/EC allows certain names without making them compulsory.
Poleg tega Direktiva 2001/110/ES omogoča nekatera imena, ne da bi bila ta obvezna.
By contrast, Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 is intended to regulate the use of registered names, even where they could be used more freely beforehand.
Nasprotno je namen Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92 urediti uporabo registriranih imen, čeprav so se prej lahko svobodneje uporabljala.
As a result, the lack of restriction at a given moment is not, in principle, a reason to refuse registration.
Zato neobstoj omejitve v danem trenutku v načelu ni razlog za odklonitev registracije.
In the light of the above, the name should thus be entered in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba ime vpisati v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih oznak“.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Regulatory Committee on the Protection of Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za predpisovanje geografskih oznak in zaščitenih označb porekla –
The name in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby added to the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96.Article 2
Priloga k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 2400/96 se dopolni z imenom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.Člen 2
OJ C 261, 30.10.2003, p. 4.
UL C 261, 30.10.2003, str. 4.
Products listed in Annex I to the EC Treaty intended for human consumption
Proizvodi, našteti v Prilogi I k pogodbi, namenjeni za prehrano ljudi
Miel de Provence (PGI)
Miel de Provence (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1855/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1855/2005
supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 as regards the entry of certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Mela Alto Adige or Südtiroler Apfel (PGI), Asperge des Sables des Landes (PGI), Pâtes d’Alsace (PGI), Jamón de Trevélez (PGI), Oliva Ascolana del Piceno (PDO))
o dopolnitvi Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2400/96 glede vnosa nekaterih imen v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“ (Mela Alto Adige ali Südtiroler Apfel – (ZGO), Asperge des Sables des Landes – (ZGO), Pâtes d’Alsace – (ZGO), Jamón de Trevélez – (ZGO), Oliva Ascolana del Piceno – (ZOP))
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 6(3) and (4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 z dne 14. julija 1992 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila [1], in zlasti člena 6(3) in (4) Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92, the Italian application to register the two names ‘Mela Alto Adige’ or ‘Südtiroler Apfel’ and ‘Oliva Ascolana del Piceno’, the French application to register the two names ‘Asperge des Sables des Landes’ and ‘Pâtes d’Alsace’, and the Spanish application to register the name ‘Jamón de Trevélez’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
V skladu s členom 6(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92, so bile zahteva Italije za registracijo dveh imen „Mela Alto Adige“ ali „Südtiroler Apfel“ in „Oliva Ascolana del Piceno“; zahteva Francije za registracijo dveh imen „Asperge des Sables des Landes“ in „Pâtes d’Alsace“; in zahteva Španije za registracijo imena „Jamón de Trevélez“ objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
As no objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 was sent to the Commission, these names should be entered in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications,
Ker Komisija ni prejela nobenega ugovora v smislu člena 7 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92, je treba ta imena vpisati v „Register zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb“ –
The names in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby added to the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 [3].Article 2
Priloga Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2400/96 [3] se dopolni z imeni iz Priloge k tej uredbi.Člen 2
OJ L 208, 24.7.1992, p. 1.
UL L 208 24.7.1992, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št 806/2003 (UL L 122, 16.5.2003, str. 1).
OJ C 12, 18.1.2005, p. 20 (Mela Alto Adige or Südtiroler Apfel);OJ C 47, 23.2.2005, p. 2 (Asperge des Sables des Landes);OJ C 47, 23.2.2005, p. 6 (Pâtes d’Alsace);OJ C 51, 1.3.2005, p. 2 (Jamón de Trevélez);OJ C 59, 9.3.2005, p. 33 (Oliva Ascolana del Piceno).
UL C 12, 18.1.2005, str. 20 (Mela Alto Adige ali Südtiroler Apfel);UL C 47, 23.2.2005, str. 2 (Asperge des Sables des Landes);UL C 47, 23.2.2005, str. 6 (Pâtes d’Aslace);UL C 51, 1.3.2005, str. 2 (Jamón de Trevélez);UL C 59, 9.3.2005, str. 33 (Oliva Ascolana del Piceno).
Products listed in Annex I to the EC Treaty, intended for human consumption
Proizvodi, našteti v prilogi I k pogodbi, namenjeni za prehrano ljudi
Meat-based products (heated, salted, smoked, etc.)
Proizvodi na osnovi mesa (kuhani, soljeni, prekajeni, itn.)
Jamón de Trevélez (PGI)
Jamón de Trevélez (ZGO)
Mela Alto Adige or Südtiroler Apfel (PGI)
Mela Alto Adige ali Südtiroler Apfel (ZGO)
Oliva Ascolana del Piceno (PDO)
Oliva Ascolana del Piceno (ZOP)
Asperge des Sables des Landes (PGI)
Asperge des Sables des Landes (ZGO)
Foodstuffs referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92:
Prehrambeni izdelki, ki jih zadeva Priloga I Uredbe (EGS) št. 2081/92
Pâtes d’Alsace (PGI)
Pâtes d’Alsace (ZGO)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1856/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1856/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advanced fixing certificates for agricultural products as regards the products for which presentation of a licence or certificate is required
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1291/2000 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravil za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode glede proizvodov, za katere je treba predložiti dovoljenje
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71 of 26 October 1971 on the common organisation of the market in seeds [1], and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2358/71 z dne 26. oktobra 1971 o skupni ureditvi trga za semena [1], in zlasti člena 4(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 of 29 April 2004 on the common organisation of the market in olive oil and table olives and amending Regulation (EEC) No 827/68 [2], and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 865/2004 z dne 29. aprila 2004 o skupni ureditvi trga za oljčno olje in namizne oljke ter o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 827/68 [2], in zlasti člena 10(4) Uredbe,
The fourth indent of Article 5(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 [3] states that a licence is not required and may not be produced for the purpose of operations relating to quantities not exceeding those set out in Annex III to that Regulation.
Četrta alinea člena 5(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1291/2000 [3] določa, da se ne zahteva nobeno dovoljenje in ne more biti predloženo za izvedbo dejavnosti, ki se nanašajo na količine, ki ne presegajo tistih, navedenih v Prilogi III k tej uredbi.
In the seeds sector, Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2004 of 6 December 2004 laying down rules for the communication of the information necessary for implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2358/71 on the common organisation of the market in seeds [4] has repealed Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1117/79 of 6 June 1979 specifying the products in the seeds sector to be subject to the system of import licences [5]; as a result hybrid maize and sorghum for sowing are no longer subject to the import licence scheme.
V sektorju semen je Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2081/2004 z dne 6. decembra 2004 o določitvi pravil za sporočanje informacij, potrebnih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2358/71 o skupni ureditvi trga za semena [4], razveljavila Uredbo Komisije (EGS) št. 1117/79 z dne 6. junija 1979 o določitvi proizvodov v sektorju semen, za katere velja sistem uvoznih dovoljenj [5], iz česar sledi, da hibridi koruze in sorga, namenjeni za setev, niso več v sistemu uvoznih dovoljenj.
In the olive oil and table olives sector, Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 provides for a decision to make exports from the Community of any of the products listed in Article 1(a) of that Regulation subject to presentation of an export licence if necessary for the purposes of following market developments.
V sektorju za oljčno olje in namizne oljke člen 10(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 865/2004 določa, da se lahko sprejme sklep o uvedbi dovoljenj za vsak izvoz proizvodov iz točke a) člena 1, če se to izkaže za potrebno za uskladitev z razvojem trga.
Other than in that instance, a licence does not have to be presented for the export of those products.
V drugih primerih se izvozno dovoljenje za te proizvode ne zahteva.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo III k Uredbi (ES) št. 1291/2000 je torej treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinions of the Management Committee for Seeds and the Management Committee for Olive Oil and Table Olives,
Ukrepi, predvideni v tej uredbi, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za semena in mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za oljčno olje in namizne oljke –
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 is hereby amended as follows:
Priloga III k Uredbi (ES) 1291/2000 se spremeni:
in Part B — Oils and Fats — the section entitled ‘Export licence with or without advance fixing of the refund (Commission Regulation (EC) No 2543/95)’ is deleted;
v Delu B – sektor za olja in masti – se del z naslovom „Izvozno dovoljenje z vnaprejšnjo določitvijo nadomestila ali brez (Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2543/95)“ črta;
Part J — Seeds — is deleted.
Del J – sektor semen – se črta.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003 (UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str. 1).
OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97.
UL L 161, 30.4.2004, str. 97.
Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1741/2004 (OJ L 311, 8.10.2004, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1741/2004 (UL L 311, 8.10.2004, str. 17).
OJ L 360, 7.12.2004, p. 6.
UL L 360, 7.12.2004, str. 6.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1857/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 opening and providing for the administration of tariff quotas for preserved mushrooms imported from third countries
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1864/2004 o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja tarifnih kvot za konzervirane gobe, uvožene iz tretjih držav
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the markets in processed fruit and vegetable products [1], and in particular Article 15(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/96 z dne 28. oktobra 1996 o skupni ureditvi trga za predelano sadje in zelenjavo [1] in zlasti člena 15(1) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 [2] opens tariff quotas of imports into the Community of preserved mushrooms of the genus Agaricus.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1864/2004 [2] odpira tarifne kvote za uvoz konzerviranih gob vrste Agaricus v Skupnost.
Due to the conclusion of Additional Protocols to the Europe Agreements with Bulgaria and Romania, approved by Council and Commission Decisions 2005/430/EC, Euratom [3] and 2005/431/EC, Euratom [4], the duty rates for products originating in Romania and the tariff quotas for products originating in Bulgaria laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 should be modified.
Zaradi sklenitve dodatnih protokolov k Evropskim sporazumom z Bolgarijo in Romunijo, ki so bili odobreni s sklepoma Sveta in Komisije 2005/430/ES, Euratom [3] in 2005/431/ES, Euratom [4], je treba stopnje dajatev za izdelke s poreklom iz Romunije in tarifne kvote za izdelke s poreklom iz Bolgarije, ki so določene v Uredbi (ES) št. 1864/2004, spremeniti.
The Additional Protocols to the Europe Agreements with Bulgaria and Romania, approved by Council and Commission Decisions 2005/430/EC, Euratom and 2005/431/EC, Euratom started to apply as of 1 August 2005.
Dodatni protokoli k Evropskim sporazumom z Bolgarijo in Romunijo, ki so bili odobreni s sklepoma Sveta in Komisije 2005/430/ES, Euratom in 2005/431/ES, Euratom, so začeli veljati 1. avgusta 2005.
The present Regulation should therefore be made applicable as of that date.
To uredbo je zato treba uporabljati od tega datuma.
Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1864/2004 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 1864/2004 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1864/2004 se spremeni:
In Article 1(2), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
V členu 1(2) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z:
‘However, no duty shall apply in respect of products originating in Romania (Order No 09.4726) and Bulgaria (Order No 09.4725).’
„Vendar pa za izdelke s poreklom iz Romunije (naročilo št. 09.4726) in Bolgarije (naročilo št. 09.4725) dajatve ne veljajo.“
Annex I is replaced by the following:
Priloga I se nadomesti z:
Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1858/2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables originating in the People’s Republic of China, India, South Africa and Ukraine following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Indije, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96
Having regard to the Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) Uredbe,
In August 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 [2] (the original Regulation), the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables (SWR) originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Hungary, India, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and Ukraine.
Avgusta 1999 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1796/1999 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov („JŽV“) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Madžarske, Indije, Mehike, Poljske, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine.
The investigation that led to these measures is hereinafter referred to as ‘the original investigation’.
Preiskava, ki je pripeljala do ukrepov, se v tem dokumentu imenuje „prvotna preiskava“.
The measures applying to these imports consisted of an ad valorem duty, except for imports from one Indian, one Mexican, one South African and one Ukrainian exporting producers from which undertakings were accepted by Commission Decision 1999/572/EC [3].
Ukrepi, veljavni za ta uvoz, so vključevali dajatev ad valorem, razen za uvoz enega indijskega, enega mehiškega, enega južnoafriškega in enega ukrajinskega proizvajalca izvoznika, katerih zaveze so bile sprejete s Sklepom Komisije 1999/572/ES [3].
By Regulation (EC) No 1678/2003, the Commission withdrew the undertaking offered by the above Ukrainian exporting producer, and by Regulation (EC) No 1674/2003, the Council reimposed the corresponding ad valorem anti-dumping duty for this exporter.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1678/2003 je Komisija preklicala zavezo, ki jo je ponudil zgoraj omenjeni ukrajinski proizvajalec izvoznik, z Uredbo (ES) št. 1674/2003 pa je Svet ponovno uvedel ustrezno protidampinško dajatev ad valorem za tega izvoznika.
Thereafter, it was found that circumvention of the original measures concerning imports from Ukraine and the PRC took place via respectively Moldova and via Morocco following investigations pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se je izogibanje prvotnim ukrepom, ki zadevajo uvoz iz Ukrajine in LRK, po preiskavah v skladu s členom 13 osnovne uredbe odvijalo prek Moldavije in Maroka.
Consequently, by Regulation (EC) No 760/2004 [4], the Council extended the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports originating in the Ukraine to imports of the same steel ropes and cables consigned from Moldova.
Zaradi tega je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 760/2004 [4] razširil dokončno protidampinško dajatev, uvedeno na uvoz s poreklom iz Ukrajine, tudi na uvoz istih jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Moldavije.
Similarly, the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports originating in the PRC was extended, by Council Regulation (EC) No 1886/2004 [5], to imports of the same steel ropes and cables consigned from Morocco, with the exception of those produced by a genuine Moroccan producer.
Podobno je bila dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena na uvoz s poreklom iz LRK, z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1886/2004 [5] razširjena na uvoz istih jeklenih vrvi in kablov, poslanih iz Maroka, z izjemo tistih izdelkov, ki jih je dejansko proizvedel maroški proizvajalec.
Investigation concerning another country
Preiskava, ki zadeva drugo državo
On 20 November 2004, by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [6], the Commission initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of the same product originating in the Republic of Korea, further to a complaint lodged by the Community industry showing prima facie evidence that such imports are being dumped and are thereby causing material injury to the Community industry.
Komisija je 20. novembra 2004 z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6], začela protidampinški postopek glede uvoza enakega izdelka s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, po tem, ko je industrija Skupnosti vložila pritožbo, ki vsebuje prima facie dokaze, da se je tako blago uvažalo po dampinških cenah in tako povzročilo znatno škodo industriji Skupnosti.
The investigation was terminated by Commission Decision 2005/739/EC [7] without imposing measures.
Preiskava je bila zaključena s Sklepom Komisije 2005/739/ES [7] brez uvedbe ukrepov.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force of SWR originating in the PRC, Hungary, India, Mexico, Poland, South Africa and Ukraine [8], the Commission received, on 17 May 2004, a request to review these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližajočem se izteku veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov za JŽV s poreklom iz LRK, Madžarske, Indije, Mehike, Poljske, Južne Afrike in Ukrajine [8] je Komisija 17. maja 2004 prejela zahtevek za pregled teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the Liaison Committee of European Union Wire Rope Industries (EWRIS) (the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 50 %, of the total Community production of SWR.
Zahtevek je vložil povezovalni odbor industrije žičnatih vrvi Evropske unije (EWRIS) („vložnik“) v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo velik delež, v tem primeru več kot 50 % proizvodnje JŽV v Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na izhodišču, da bi se zaradi izteka veljavnosti teh ukrepov damping in škoda za industrijo Skupnosti verjetno nadaljevala ali ponovno pojavila.
In the absence of such evidence concerning imports originating in Mexico, the applicant did not request the initiation of an expiry review concerning imports originating in Mexico.
Ker ni bilo dokazov, ki bi se nanašali na uvoz s poreklom iz Mehike, vložnik ni zahteval začetka pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa glede uvoza s poreklom iz Mehike.
Consequently, the measures applicable to imports originating in Mexico expired on 18 August 2004 [9].
Zato so ukrepi, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz s poreklom iz Mehike, 18. avgusta 2004 [9] prenehali veljati.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of a review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission initiated a review [10].
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov za začetek pregleda v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe, zato je začela pregled [10].
The Commission officially advised the exporting producers, importers, users known to be concerned and their associations, the representatives of the exporting countries and the Community producers of the initiation of the expiry review.
Komisija je o pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa uradno obvestila proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, uporabnike, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in njihova združenja, predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic in proizvajalce Skupnosti.