natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The necessary price increase to eliminate injury was determined on a per-company basis by comparing the weighted average import price of the product concerned with the non-injurious price of the like product sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Potrebno zvišanje cene za odpravo škode je bilo ugotovljeno za vsako podjetje s primerjavo tehtanega povprečja uvozne cene zadevnega izdelka z neškodljivo ceno podobnega izdelka, ki ga prodaja industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti.
The price difference was expressed as a percentage of the CIF import value.
Razlika v ceni je izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by taking the weighted average cost of production of the Community industry together with a profit margin of 10 %.
Neškodljiva cena je bila ugotovljena z uporabo tehtanega povprečja stroškov proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti skupaj z 10 % stopnjo dobička.
This profit margin, which is one-third less than that taken in the original investigation (see recital 205 above), reflects the achievable profit margin for similar product groups of the Community industry not subject to unfair competition.
Ta stopnja dobička, ki je za tretjino nižja od stopnje dobička, uporabljene v prvotni preiskavi (glej uvodno izjavo (205) zgoraj), odraža dosegljivo stopnjo dobička za podobne skupine izdelkov industrije Skupnosti, ki niso izpostavljeni nepošteni konkurenci.
In view of increased competition, it was considered an appropriate and reasonable minimum instead of the 15 % profit margin established in the original investigation.
Zaradi povečane konkurence se je ta stopnja dobička štela za ustrezen in smiseln minimum, namesto 15 % stopnje dobička, določene v prvotni preiskavi.
This profit would allow the Community industry to further invest in research and development in order to remain competitive.
Taka stopnja dobička bi industriji Skupnosti omogočila nadaljnje vlaganje v raziskave in razvoj, da ostane konkurenčna.
Form and level of measures
Oblika in višina ukrepov
In the absence of particular circumstances, the imposition of the standard duty type, i.e. ad valorem, was considered appropriate.
V odsotnosti posebnih okoliščin se je za primerno štela uvedba standardne vrste dajatve, tj. ad valorem.
With regard to the level of duty, in the case of four of the cooperating exporters the subsidy rate was higher than the injury elimination level.
Glede višine dajatve je bila v primeru štirih sodelujočih izvoznikov stopnja subvencioniranja višja od stopnje odprave škode.
Thus in accordance with Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, the lesser duty reflecting the injury elimination level was considered adequate to remove such injury to the Community industry insofar as imports from these four exporters are concerned.
Tako se je v skladu s členom 15(1) osnovne uredbe za te štiri uvoznike za primerno štela nižja dajatev, ki odraža stopnjo odprave škode, da se odpravi ta škoda industrije Skupnosti.
The rates of duty applicable to imports from these exporters should range from 17,3 to 30,3 %.
Stopnja dajatve, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz teh izvoznikov, morajo biti med 17,3 % in 30,3 %.
As far as the other three exporters are concerned, the injury elimination levels were higher than the subsidy rates established, so that measures in respect of those companies should be based on the latter.
Pri ostalih treh izvoznikih je bila stopnja odprave škode višja od stopenj subvencij, tako da ukrepi glede teh podjetij temeljijo na slednji.
The rates of duty applicable to imports from these exporters should range from 25,3 to 32 %.
Stopnje dajatve, ki jih za uvoz uporabljajo ti izvozniki, mora biti med 25,3 % in 32 %.
Given the fact that the level of cooperation of Indian exporters was high (over 80 %), the level of duty for all other companies should be set at the level of the company with the highest individual duty rate, i.e. 32 %.
Glede na dejstvo, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja indijskih izvoznikov visoka (več kot 80 %), je stopnja dajatve za vsa ostala podjetja določena s stopnjo podjetja z najvišjo posamezno stopnjo dajatve, tj. 32 %.
The individual company countervailing duty rates specified in this Regulation reflect the situation found during the review with respect to the cooperating exporters.
Individualne stopnje izravnalnih dajatev za podjetja, določene v tej uredbi, odražajo stanje, kot je bilo ugotovljeno med pregledom glede na sodelujoče izvoznike.
Thus, they are solely applicable to imports of the product concerned produced by these companies.
Tako se uporabljajo izključno za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, ki so ga izdelala ta podjetja.
Imports of the product concerned manufactured by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvozi zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je izdelalo drugo podjetje, ki ni izrecno omenjeno v operativnem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani z izrecno omenjenimi, ne morejo uporabljati teh stopenj dajatev in zanje velja stopnja, ki velja za „vsa ostala podjetja“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual countervailing duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [10] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for instance, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vse zahteve za uporabo teh individualnih stopenj dajatve (npr. po spremembi imena subjekta ali vzpostavitvi novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih subjektov) se nemudoma naslovijo na Komisijo [10] z vsemi ustreznimi podatki, zlasti glede vsake spremembe dejavnosti podjetja, povezane s proizvodnjo, domačo in izvozno prodajo, npr. na spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, and after consultation of the Advisory Committee, the Regulation will be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates,
Če je to potrebno, bo po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom ta uredba ustrezno spremenjena s posodobitvijo seznama podjetij, ki uporabljajo individualne stopnje dajatve –
A definitive countervailing duty is hereby imposed on imports of amoxicillin trihydrate, ampicillin trihydrate and cefalexin not put up in measured doses or in forms or packings for retail sale falling within CN codes ex29411010 (TARIC code 2941101010), ex29411020 (TARIC code 2941102010) and ex29419000 (TARIC code 2941900030) originating in India.
Uvede se dokončna izravnalna dajatev na uvoz amoksicilin trihidrata, ampicilin trihidrata in cefaleksina, ki niso predloženi v odmerkih ali v pakiranjih za prodajo na drobno in ki sodijo pod tarifne oznake ex29411010 (oznaka TARIC 2941101010), ex29411020 (oznaka TARIC 2941102010) in ex29419000 (oznaka TARIC 2941900030), s poreklom iz Indije.
The rate of duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty for imports produced in India by the companies listed below, shall be as follows:
Stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja na neto ceno franko, meja Skupnosti, neocarinjeno, za uvoz izdelkov, ki jih v Indiji proizvedejo spodaj našteta podjetja, je sledeča:
17,3 % for KDL Biotech Ltd, Mumbai (TARIC additional code: A580),
17,3 % za KDL Biotech Ltd., Bombaj (dodatna oznaka TARIC: A580),
28,1 % for Nectar Lifesciences Ltd, Chandigarh (TARIC additional code: A581),
28,1 % za Nectar Lifesciences Ltd., Čandigar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: A581),
25,3 % for Nestor Pharmaceuticals Ltd, New Delhi (TARIC additional code: A582),
25,3 % za Nestor Pharmaceuticals Ltd., New Delhi (dodatna oznaka TARIC: A582),
30,3 % for Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd, New Delhi (TARIC additional code: 8221),
30,3 % za Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., New Delhi (dodatna oznaka TARIC: 8221),
28,1 % for Torrent Gujarat Biotech Ltd, Ahmedabad (TARIC additional code: A583),
28,1 % za Torrent Gujarat Biotech Ltd., Ahmedabad (dodatna oznaka TARIC: A583),
28,1 % for Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Chandigarh (TARIC additional code: A584),
28,1 % za Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Čandigar (dodatna oznaka TARIC: A584),
32 % for all other companies (TARIC additional code: 8900).
32 % za vsa ostala podjetja (dodatna oznaka TARIC: 8900).
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Če ni drugače določeno, se uporabljajo veljavni carinski predpisi.
OJ L 288, 21.10.97, p. 1.
UL L 288, 21.10.1997, str. 1.
OJ C 8, 14.1.2003, p. 2.
UL C 8, 14.1.2003, str. 2.
OJ C 241, 8.10.2003, p. 7.
UL C 241, 8.10.2003, str. 7.
OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 17, recital 9.
UL L 166, 11.6.1998, str. 17, uvodna izjava (9).
Notification No 1/2002-07 of 31.3.2002 of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the GOI.
Uradno obvestilo št. 1/2002-07 z dne 31.3.2002 Ministrstva za trgovino in industrijo IV.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1628/2004 (OJ L 295, 18.9.2004, p. 4 (recital 13)).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1628/2004 (UL L 295, 13.9.2004, str. 4) (uvodna izjava (13)).
The Indian Finance Act 1999 prolonged the application from 2000 to 2005.
Indijski finančni zakon iz leta 1999 je uporabo podaljšal iz leta 2000 na 2005.
Article 143(1)(e)(h) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 1).
Člen 143(1)(e)(h) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str. 1).
European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade, Directorate B J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussels.
Evropska Komisija, Generalni direktorat za trgovino, Direktorat B, J-79 5/17, Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Bruselj.
Nectar Lifesciences Ltd, Chandigarh,
Nectar Lifesciences Ltd., Čandigar,
During the post-disclosure hearing the GOI and one exporting producer have drawn attention to the fact that one Community producer mentioned certain differences in ‘stability, purity, assay, galenical properties etc.’ when comparing the product concerned and the like product.
Med zaslišanjem po razkritju sta IV in en proizvajalec izvoznik opozorila na dejstvo, da je en proizvajalec Skupnosti omenil določene razlike v „stabilnosti, čistosti, vsebnosti, galeničnih lastnostih, itd.“ pri primerjavi zadevnega in podobnega izdelka.
In addition, the only cooperating importer mentioned differences with regard to water solubility.
Poleg tega je edini sodelujoči uvoznik omenil razlike glede topnosti v vodi.
In this respect the Master Circular on Rupee Export Credit notes that ‘ceiling rates of interest on credit extended to exporters as prescribed in this Circular are lower than the maximum lending rates normally charged to other borrowers and are, therefore, indicated as concessive in this sense.’ The difference in rates might decrease for companies with good credit ratings.
V tem pogledu Master Circular o izvoznih kreditih v rupijah navaja, da so „najvišje obrestne mere za kredite za izvoznike, kot je določeno v tej okrožnici, nižje od najvišjih obrestnih mer, ki se običajno obračunajo ostalim posojilojemalcem in se zato v tem smislu pojmujejo kot koncesijske.“ Razlika med obrestnimi merami se lahko zmanjša za podjetja z dobro boniteto.
The claim for the use of another methodology was not substantiated.
Zahteva po uporabi druge metodologije ni bila utemeljena.
Thus, the suggestion to choose an alternative methodology is refuted.
Zato se predlog izbora druge metodologije zavrne.
The situation of the Community industry improved in the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju se je stanje industrije Skupnosti izboljšalo.
However, it did not fully recover from past subsidisation and continues to be weak.
Vendar pa si ni popolnoma opomogla od preteklega subvencioniranja in je še naprej šibka.
Volume wise, the observation is correct that India was not the only source of significant imports during all the time of the period considered.
Glede obsega je pravilna ugotovitev, da Indija ni bila edini vir pomembnega uvoza v celotnem času obravnavanega obdobja.
However, it is recalled that India is the only country subject to measures.
Opozarja pa se, da je Indija edina država, proti kateri so uvedeni ukrepi.
Surya Pharmaceutical Ltd, Chandigarh.
Surya Pharmaceutical Ltd., Čandigar.
In so far as the sales tax reimbursement and import duty exemption provisions are used for purchasing capital goods, they are already not in conformity with the rules for permitted drawback systems, because those goods are not consumed in the production process, as required by Annex I item (h) (sales tax reimbursement) and (i) (import duties remission). The exporter objected to this analysis and argued that since capital goods are necessary for production, they cannot be per se excluded from any permitted duty drawback.
V kolikor se povračilo prometnega davka in oprostitev uvoznih dajatev uporabljata za nakup investicijskega blaga, to pomeni da že nista več v skladu s predpisi o dovoljenih sistemih povračil, ker se to blago ne porabi v proizvodnem postopku, kot to zahteva točka (h) (povračilo prometnega davka) in točka (i) (odpust uvoznih dajatev) Priloge I. Izvoznik je tej analizi ugovarjal s trditvijo, da investicijsko blago per se ne more biti izključeno iz dovoljenega povračila dajatev, ker je nujno za proizvodnjo.
None of the four subschemes used in the present case can be considered as permissible duty drawback systems or substitution drawback systems within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation. This finding is confirmed after careful consideration of the disclosure submissions.
Nobena od štirih podshem, ki se uporabljajo v tem primeru, se ne more šteti za dovoljen sistem povračila dajatev ali nadomestnega povračila dajatev v smislu člena 2(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe.
The GOI did not effectively apply its verification system or procedure to confirm whether and in what amounts inputs were consumed in the production of the exported product (Annex II(II)(4) of the basic Regulation and, in the case of substitution drawback schemes, Annex III(II)(2) of the basic Regulation). The SIONs for the product concerned were not sufficiently precise.
IV ni učinkovito uporabljala svojega sistema ali postopka preverjanja, da bi lahko potrdila, ali in v kakšnih količinah so bile surovine porabljene pri proizvodnji izvoznega izdelka (Priloga II(II)(4) osnovne uredbe in, v primeru nadomestnih shem povračil, Priloga III(II)(2) osnovne uredbe).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 714/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 714/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 May 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 13. maja 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 12 May 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 12. maja 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 715/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 715/2005
opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 02062991 (1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006)
o odprtju in zagotavljanju upravljanja tarifne kvote za zamrznjeno goveje meso z oznako KN 0202 in proizvode z oznako KN 02062991 (od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006)
The WTO schedule CXL requires the Community to open an annual import quota of 53000 tonnes of frozen beef covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 02062991 (order number 09.4003).
Lista CXL v okviru STO od Skupnosti zahteva, da za zamrznjeno goveje meso z oznako KN 0202 in proizvode z oznako KN 02062991 odpre letno uvozno kvoto v višini 53000 ton (zaporedna številka 09.4003).
Implementing rules should be laid down for the quota year 2005/06 starting on 1 July 2005.
Pravila za izvajanje je treba določiti za kvotno leto 2005/2006, ki se začne 1. julija 2005.
The 2004/05 quota was managed in conformity with the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1203/2004 of 29 June 2004 opening and providing for the administration of a tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 02062991 (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005) [2].
Upravljanje kvote za leto 2004/2005 je potekalo v skladu z določbami Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1203/2004 z dne 29. junija 2004 o odpiranju in določitvi upravljanja tarifne kvote za zamrznjeno goveje meso, ki se uvršča v oznako KN 0202, in proizvode, ki se uvrščajo v oznako KN 02062991 (od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005) [2].
That Regulation introduced a method of administration based on an import performance criterion ensuring that the quota is allocated to professional operators able to import beef without undue speculation.
Navedena uredba je uvedla način upravljanja, ki temelji na količini uvoza in zagotavlja, da se kvota dodeli poklicnim izvajalcem, ki lahko meso uvozijo brez nepotrebnih špekulacij.
The experience obtained from the application of that method shows that there are positive results and therefore it is appropriate to maintain the same method of administration for the quota year 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006.
Izkušnje, pridobljene z uporabo navedenega načina, kažejo pozitivne rezultate, zaradi česar je primerno, da se isti način upravljanja obdrži za kvotno leto od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006.
It is appropriate to determine a reference period for eligible imports which is long enough to provide for a representative performance while also sufficiently recent to reflect the latest development in trade.
Primerno je, da se za upravičene uvoze določi referenčno obdobje, ki traja dovolj dolgo, da je iz njega razvidna reprezentativna količina in je časovno dovolj blizu, da odraža najnovejši razvoj trgovine.
For control reasons, applications for import rights should be submitted in the Member States where the operator is entered in the national VAT register.
Zaradi nadzora je treba zahtevke za uvozne pravice predložiti v državah članicah, v katerih je izvajalec vpisan v nacionalni register zavezancev za plačilo davka na dodano vrednost.
In order to prevent speculation, a security relating to import rights should be fixed for each applicant under the quota.
Da bi preprečili špekulacije, je treba za vsakega prosilca določiti varščino za uvozne pravice v okviru kvote.
To oblige operators to apply for import licences for all the import rights allocated, it should be established that such obligation constitutes a primary requirement within the meaning of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products [3].
Da bi izvajalce obvezali, da vložijo zahtevke za uvozna dovoljenja za vse dodeljene uvozne pravice, je treba določiti, da takšna obveza pomeni primarno zahtevo v smislu Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2220/85 z dne 22. julija 1985 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema varščin za kmetijske proizvode [3].
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products [4] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 of 26 June 1995 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2377/80 [5] should be applicable to import licences issued under this Regulation, save where derogations are appropriate.
Razen kadar so odstopanja primerna, je treba za uvozna dovoljenja, izdana po tej uredbi, uporabljati Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1291/2000 z dne 9. junija 2000 o določitvi skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj in potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode [4] in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1445/95 z dne 26. junija 1995 o pravilih za uporabo uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj za goveje in telečje meso ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2377/80 [5].
The Management Committee for Beef and Veal has not given an opinion within the time limit set by its President,
Upravljalni odbor za govedino in teletino ni podal mnenja v roku, ki ga je določil njegov predsednik –
A tariff quota totalling 53000 tonnes expressed in weight of boneless meat is hereby opened for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 02062991 for the period 1 July 2005 to 30 June 2006.
Tarifna kvota v višini 53000 ton, izražena v teži mesa brez kosti, je zato odprta za zamrznjeno goveje meso z oznako KN 0202 in proizvode z oznako KN 02062991 za obdobje od 1. julija 2005 do 30. junija 2006.
The Common Customs Tariff duty applicable to the quota provided for in paragraph 1 shall be 20 % ad valorem.
Skupna carinska tarifa, ki se uporablja za kvoto iz odstavka 1, znaša 20 % ad valorem.
For the purposes of this Regulation,
V tej uredbi:
100 kilograms of bone-in meat shall be equivalent to 77 kilograms of boneless meat;
100 kilogramov mesa s kostmi ustreza 77 kilogramom mesa brez kosti;
‘frozen meat’ means meat that is frozen and has an internal temperature of – 12 °C or lower when it enters the customs territory of the Community.
„zamrznjeno meso“ je meso, ki je zamrznjeno in je njegova notranja temperatura ob vstopu na carinsko območje Skupnosti enaka ali nižja -12 °C.
A Community operator may apply for import rights on the basis of a reference quantity which shall be the quantities of beef falling under CN codes 0201, 0202, 02061095 or 02062991 imported by him/her or on his behalf under the relevant customs provisions, between 1 May 2004 and 30 April 2005.
Izvajalec iz Skupnosti lahko vloži zahtevek za uvozne pravice na podlagi referenčne količine, ki so količine govejega mesa z oznako KN 0201, 0202, 02061095 ali 02062991, ki jih je uvozil sam ali na svoj račun po zadevnih carinskih predpisih med 1. majem 2004 in 30. aprilom 2005.
A company formed by the merger of companies each having reference imports may use those reference imports as basis for its application.
Družba, ki je nastala z združitvijo družb, od katerih ima vsaka referenčne uvoze, lahko te referenčne uvoze uporabi kot osnovo za svojo prošnjo.
Proof of imports referred to in paragraph 1 shall accompany the application for import rights and shall be provided by means of a duly endorsed copy for the consignee of the customs declaration for release for free circulation.
Zahtevku za uvozne pravice je treba priložiti dokazilo o uvozih iz odstavka 1 v obliki pravilno overjene kopije za prejemnika carinske deklaracije za sprostitev v prosti promet.
No later than 13.00, Brussels time, on the second Friday following the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union, applications for import rights shall reach the competent authority in the Member State where the applicant is entered in the national VAT register.
Zahtevke za uvozne pravice prejme pristojni organ v državi članici, v kateri je prosilec vpisan v nacionalni register zavezancev za plačilo davka na dodano vrednost, najpozneje do 13. ure po bruseljskem času drugi petek po objavi te uredbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
After verifying the documents submitted, the Member States shall communicate to the Commission no later than the fifth Friday following the date of the publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Union, a list of applicants for import rights under the quota provided for in Article 1(1), including in particular their names and addresses and the quantities of eligible meat imported during the reference period concerned.
Po preverjanju predloženih dokumentov države članice najkasneje peti petek po objavi te uredbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije pošljejo Komisiji seznam vlagateljev zahtevkov za uvozne pravice v okviru kvote iz člena 1(1), vključno z njihovimi imeni in naslovi ter količinami mesa, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje in so bile uvožene v zadevnem referenčnem obdobju.