natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The authorisation should as a general rule enable the provider to have access to the service activity, or to exercise that activity, throughout the national territory, unless a territorial limit is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Dovoljenje bi moralo ponudniku praviloma omogočiti začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti na celotnem nacionalnem ozemlju, razen v primeru, če je ozemeljsko omejevanje utemeljeno s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
For example, environmental protection may justify the requirement to obtain an individual authorisation for each installation on the national territory.
Varstvo okolja na primer lahko upravičuje zahtevo za pridobitev posameznega dovoljenja za vsako tehnično nameščanje na nacionalnem ozemlju.
This provision should not affect regional or local competences for the granting of authorisations within the Member States.
Ta določba ne bi smela vplivati na regionalne ali lokalne pristojnosti za izdajo dovoljenj v državah članicah.
This Directive, and in particular the provisions concerning authorisation schemes and the territorial scope of an authorisation, should not interfere with the division of regional or local competences within the Member States, including regional and local self-government and the use of official languages.
Ta direktiva in še zlasti določbe v zvezi s sistemi dovoljenj in ozemeljsko omejitvijo dovoljenj ne bi smele posegati v razdelitev regionalnih ali lokalnih pristojnosti v državah članicah, vključno z regionalno in lokalno samoupravo ter uporabo uradnih jezikov.
The provision relating to the non-duplication of conditions for the granting of an authorisation should not prevent Member States from applying their own conditions as specified in the authorisation scheme.
Določba, ki se nanaša na nepodvajanje pogojev za izdajo dovoljenj, državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati uporabe svojih pogojev, opredeljenih v sistemu dovoljenj.
It should only require that competent authorities, when considering whether these conditions are met by the applicant, take into account the equivalent conditions which have already been satisfied by the applicant in another Member State.
Zahtevati bi morala le, da pristojni organi ob ugotavljanju, ali prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje, upoštevajo enakovredne pogoje, ki jih je prosilec že izpolnil v drugi državi članici.
This provision should not require the application of the conditions for the granting of an authorisation provided for in the authorisation scheme of another Member State.
Ta določba ne bi smela predpisati uporabe pogojev za izdajo dovoljenj, ki so določeni v sistemu dovoljenj druge države članice.
Where the number of authorisations available for an activity is limited because of scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity, a procedure for selection from among several potential candidates should be adopted with the aim of developing through open competition the quality and conditions for supply of services available to users.
Če je število razpoložljivih dovoljenj za določeno dejavnost omejeno zaradi pomanjkanja naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti, bi bilo treba sprejeti postopek za izbiranje med več možnimi kandidati, tako da se v okviru javnega natečaja dosežejo kakovost in pogoji za storitve, ki so prejemniku na voljo.
Such a procedure should provide guarantees of transparency and impartiality and the authorisation thus granted should not have an excessive duration, be subject to automatic renewal or confer any advantage on the provider whose authorisation has just expired.
Takšen postopek bi moral zagotavljati preglednost in nepristranskost ter omogočati, da odobreno dovoljenje nima predolgega obdobja veljavnosti, da se ne podaljšuje samodejno in da ponudniku, kateremu je dovoljenje pravkar poteklo, ne dodeljuje nobenih ugodnosti.
In particular, the duration of the authorisation granted should be fixed in such a way that it does not restrict or limit free competition beyond what is necessary in order to enable the provider to recoup the cost of investment and to make a fair return on the capital invested.
Veljavnost izdanega dovoljenja bi morala biti določena zlasti tako, da svobodne konkurence ne omejuje bolj, kot je to potrebno za poplačilo stroška naložbe ponudniku in primeren donos na vloženi kapital.
This provision should not prevent Member States from limiting the number of authorisations for reasons other than scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity.
Ta določba ne bi smela preprečevati državam članicam, da omejijo število dovoljenj zaradi drugih razlogov poleg omejenosti naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti.
These authorisationsshould remain in any case subject to the other provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes.
Ta dovoljenja bi morala biti predmet tistih določb te direktive, ki se nanašajo na sisteme dovoljenj.
In the absence of different arrangements, failing a response within a time period, an authorisation should be deemed to have been granted.
V primeru, da drugačne ureditve ne obstajajo in če v določenem roku ni odgovora, bi se moralo šteti, da je dovoljenje izdano.
However, different arrangements may be put in place in respect of certain activities, where objectively justified by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, including a legitimate interest of third parties.
Vendar se za nekatere dejavnosti lahko sprejme drugačna ureditev, če je ta objektivno utemeljena s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, vključno z zakonitim interesom tretjih oseb.
Such different arrangements could include national rules according to which, in the absence of a response of the competent authority, the application is deemed to have been rejected, this rejection being open to challenge before the courts.
Takšne drugačne ureditve lahko vključujejo nacionalne predpise, v skladu s katerimi se v primeru, če pristojni organ prosilcu ne odgovori, prošnja za izdajo dovoljenja šteje kot zavrnjena ter je takšno odločitev mogoče izpodbijati pred sodišči.
In order to establish a genuine internal market for services, it is necessary to abolish any restrictions on the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services which are still enshrined in the laws of certain Member States and which are incompatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the Treaty respectively.
Za vzpostavitev dejanskega notranjega trga storitev je treba odpraviti vse omejitve svobode ustanavljanja in prostega pretoka storitev, ki jih še vedno vsebujejo predpisi nekaterih držav članic in niso v skladu s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe.
The restrictions to be prohibited particularly affect the internal market for services and should be systematically dismantled as soon as possible.
Omejitve, ki jih je treba prepovedati in ki zlasti vplivajo na notranji trg storitev, se morajo sistematično odpraviti v najkrajšem možnem času.
Freedom of establishment is predicated, in particular, upon the principle of equal treatment, which entails the prohibition not only of any discrimination on grounds of nationality but also of any indirect discrimination based on other grounds but capable of producing the same result.
Svoboda ustanavljanja temelji zlasti na načelu enake obravnave, ki ne prepoveduje le diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, ampak tudi posredno diskriminacijo na drugih podlagah, ki imajo lahko enake posledice.
Thus, access to a service activity or the exercise thereof in a Member State, either as a principal or secondary activity, should not be made subject to criteria such as place of establishment, residence, domicile or principal provision of the service activity.
Tako za začetek opravljanja ali za opravljanje storitvenih dejavnosti, bodisi kot glavnih bodisi kot sekundarnih dejavnosti, v državi članici ne bi smela veljati merila, kot so sedež, prebivališče, stalno bivališče ali glavno opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti.
However, these criteria should not include requirements according to which a provider or one of his employees or a representative must be present during the exercise of the activity when this is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Vendar ta merila ne bi smela zajemati zahtev, v skladu s katerimi mora biti ponudnik storitev ali eden izmed njegovih uslužbencev prisoten pri izvajanju dejavnosti, kadar je to utemeljeno s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
Furthermore, a Member State should not restrict the legal capacity or the right of companies, incorporated in accordance with the law of another Member State on whose territory they have their primary establishment, to bring legal proceedings.
Poleg tega država članica ne bi smela omejevati pravne sposobnosti ali pravice do sprožitve pravnega postopka družbam, ustanovljenim v skladu s predpisi druge države članice, na ozemlju katere imajo glavni sedež.
Moreover, a Member State should not be able to confer any advantages on providers having a particular national or local socio-economic link; nor should it be able to restrict, on grounds of place of establishment, the provider's freedom to acquire, exploit or dispose of rights and goods or to access different forms of credit or accommodation in so far as those choices are useful for access to his activity or for the effective exercise thereof.
Država članica prav tako ne bi smela dajati nobene prednosti ponudnikom, ki imajo posebno nacionalno ali lokalno socialno-ekonomsko povezavo; niti ne bi smela na podlagi sedeža omejevati svobode ponudnika, da pridobiva ali izkorišča pravice in blago ali z njimi razpolaga ali da dostopa do različnih vrst posojil ali namestitve, če so te odločitve koristne za začetek opravljanja ali učinkovito upravljanje dejavnosti.
Access to or the exercise of a service activity in the territory of a Member State should not be subject to an economic test.
Začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti ne bi smelo biti predmet kakršnega koli ekonomskega preskusa.
The prohibition of economic tests as a prerequisite for the grant of authorisation should cover economic tests as such, but not requirements which are objectively justified by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, such as the protection of the urban environment, social policy or public health.
Prepoved ekonomskih preizkusov kot predpogoja za izdajo dovoljenja bi morala zadevati ekonomske preizkuse kot take, ne pa tudi zahtev, ki jih objektivno utemeljujejo pomembne razloge, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, kot so varstvo mestnega okolja, cilji socialne politike in javnega zdravja.
The prohibition should not affect the exercise of the powers of the authorities responsible for applying competition law.
Ta prepoved ne bi smela vplivati na izvajanje pristojnosti organov, odgovornih za uporabo konkurenčnega prava.
With respect to financial guarantees or insurance, the prohibition of requirements should concern only the obligation that the requested financial guarantees or insurance must be obtained from a financial institution established in the Member State concerned.
V zvezi s finančnimi jamstvi in zavarovanji bi morala prepoved zahtev zadevati samo obveznost, da mora zahtevano finančno jamstvo ali zavarovanje dati finančna institucija s sedežem v zadevni državi članici.
With respect to pre-registration, the prohibition of requirements should concern only the obligation that the provider, prior to the establishment, be pre-registered for a given period in a register held in the Member State concerned.
V zvezi s predhodno registracijo bi morala prepoved zahtev zadevati samo obveznost, da je ponudnik pred ustanovitvijo sedeža za določen čas predhodno registriran v registru zadevne države članice.
In order to coordinate the modernisation of national rules and regulations in a manner consistent with the requirements of the internal market, it is necessary to evaluate certain non-discriminatory national requirements which, by their very nature, could severely restrict or even prevent access to an activity or the exercise thereof under the freedom of establishment.
Da bo posodabljanje nacionalnih predpisov skladno z zahtevami notranjega trga, je treba oceniti določene nediskriminatorne nacionalne zahteve, ki bi lahko po svoji naravi v okviru svobode ustanavljanja resno omejile ali celo preprečile začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje dejavnosti.
This evaluation process should be limited to the compatibility of these requirements with the criteria already established by the Court of Justice on the freedom of establishment.
Ta postopek ocenjevanja bi moral biti omejen z združljivostjo teh zahtev z merili za svobodo ustanavljanja, ki jih je že določilo Sodišče.
It should not concern the application of Community competition law.
Ne bi smelo zadevati uporabe konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
Where such requirements are discriminatory or not objectively justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest, or where they are disproportionate, they must be abolished or amended.
Če so takšne zahteve diskriminatorne, niso objektivno utemeljene s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, ali so nesorazmerne, jih je treba odpraviti ali spremeniti.
The outcome of this assessment will be different according to the nature of the activity and the public interest concerned.
Rezultat tega ocenjevanja se bo razlikoval glede na vrsto dejavnosti in zadevni javni interes.
In particular, such requirements could be fully justified when they pursue social policy objectives.
Takšne zahteve bi bile lahko v celoti utemeljene zlasti takrat, kadar bi uveljavljale cilje socialne politike.
For the purposes of this Directive, and without prejudice to Article 16 of the Treaty, services may be considered to be services of general economic interest only if they are provided in application of a special task in the public interest entrusted to the provider by the Member State concerned.
Za namene te direktive in brez poseganja v člen 16 Pogodbe se lahko storitve obravnavajo kot storitve splošnega ekonomskega pomena samo, če se opravljajo pri izvajanju posebnih nalog javnega pomena, za katere je zadevna država članica zadolžila ponudnika.
This assignment should be made by way of one or more acts, the form of which is determined by the Member State concerned, and should specify the precise nature of the special task.
Ta zadolžitev bi morala biti določena v enem ali več aktih, katerih vrsto določi vsaka zadevna država članica, in bi morala natančno določiti naravo posebne naloge.
The mutual evaluation process provided for in this Directive should not affect the freedom of Member States to set in their legislation a high level of protection of the public interest, in particular in relation to social policy objectives.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, predviden v tej direktivi, ne bi smel vplivati na svobodo držav članic, da v zakonodaji določijo višjo raven zaščite javnih interesov, še zlasti za doseganje ciljev socialne politike.
Furthermore, it is necessary that the mutual evaluation process take fully into account the specificity of services of general economic interest and of the particular tasks assigned to them.
Nadalje mora postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja v celoti upoštevati posebnosti storitev splošnega ekonomskega pomena in posebnih nalog, ki so jim dodeljene.
This may justify certain restrictions on the freedom of establishment, in particular where such restrictions pursue the protection of public health and social policy objectives and where they satisfy the conditions set out in Article 15(3)(a), (b) and (c).
Te lahko upravičijo določene omejitve svobode ustanavljanja, zlasti v primerih, ko takšne omejitve uveljavljajo cilje varovanja javnega zdravja in socialne politike ter ko izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 15(3)(a) do (c).
For example, with regard to the obligation to take a specific legal form in order to exercise certain services in the social field, the Court of Justice has already recognised that it may be justified to subject the provider to a requirement to be non-profit making.
Sodišče je na primer glede obveznosti za prevzem določene pravne oblike za izvedbo nekaterih storitev na socialnem področju že priznalo, da je zahteva, da ponudnik storitev deluje nepridobitno, utemeljena.
Services of a general economic interest are entrusted with important tasks relating to social and territorial cohesion.
Storitve splošnega ekonomskega pomena imajo pomembno nalogo v zvezi s socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo.
The performance of these tasks should not be obstructed as a result of the evaluation process provided for in this Directive.
Opravljanje teh nalog ne sme biti onemogočeno zaradi rezultatov postopka ocenjevanja, ki ga določa ta direktiva.
Requirements which are necessary for the fulfilment of such tasks should not be affected by this process while, at the same time, unjustified restrictions on the freedom of establishment should be addressed.
Ta postopek ne bi smel vplivati na zahteve, ki so potrebne za opravljanje teh nalog, hkrati pa bi bilo treba obravnavati neupravičeno omejevanje svobode ustanavljanja.
The requirements to be examined include national rules which, on grounds other than those relating to professional qualifications, reserve access to certain activities to particular providers.
Zahteve, ki jih je treba preučiti, vključujejo nacionalne predpise, ki zaradi razlogov, ki se ne nanašajo na poklicne kvalifikacije, posameznim ponudnikom preprečujejo začetek opravljanja nekaterih dejavnosti.
These requirements also include obligations on a provider to take a specific legal form, in particular to be a legal person, to be a company with individual ownership, to be a non-profit making organisation or a company owned exclusively by natural persons, and requirements which relate to the shareholding of a company, in particular obligations to hold a minimum amount of capital for certain service activities or to have a specific qualification in order to hold share capital in or to manage certain companies.
Te zahteve vključujejo tudi obveznosti ponudnika, da prevzame določeno pravno obliko, zlasti da postane pravna oseba, podjetje v zasebni lasti, nepridobitna organizacija ali podjetje v izključni lasti fizičnih oseb, ter zahteve, ki se nanašajo na lastništvo delnic podjetja, zlasti obveznosti, ki določajo, da mora biti zagotovljen minimalni kapital za določene storitvene dejavnosti ali da morajo biti izpolnjene določene poklicne kvalifikacije za lastnike deležev ali vodstvo v določenih podjetjih.
The evaluation of the compatibility of fixed minimum and/or maximum tariffs with the freedom of establishment concerns only tariffs imposed by competent authorities specifically for the provision of certain services and not, for example, general rules on price determination, such as for the renting of houses.
Ocenjevanje združljivosti določene najnižje in/ali najvišje tarife s svobodo ustanavljanja zadeva samo tarife, ki so jih pristojni organi uvedli posebej za zagotavljanje nekaterih storitev, ne zadeva pa na primer splošnih predpisov o določanju cen, denimo v zvezi z najemom hiš.
Each report will be submitted to all other Member States and interested parties.
Vsako poročilo bo predloženo vsem ostalim državam članicam in zainteresiranim strankam.
Member States will then have six months in which to submit their observations on these reports.
Države članice bodo nato imele na voljo šest mesecev za predložitev pripomb v zvezi s temi poročili.
At the latest by one year after the date of transposition of this Directive, the Commission should draw up a summary report, accompanied where appropriate by proposals for further initiatives.
Komisija bi morala najpozneje eno leto po prenosu te direktive pripraviti zbirno poročilo in mu po potrebi priložiti predloge za nadaljnje pobude.
If necessary the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, could assist them to design a common method.
Komisija bo v sodelovanju z drugimi državami članicami po potrebi pomagala posamezni državi članici pri oblikovanju skupne metode.
The fact that this Directive specifies a number of requirements to be abolished or evaluated by the Member States during the transposition period is without prejudice to any infringement proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 or 49 of the Treaty.
Dejstvo, da ta direktiva opredeljuje številne zahteve, ki jih bodo države članice v obdobju prenosa odpravile ali ovrednotile, ne posega v postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, sprožene proti državam članicam zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznosti iz členov 43 ali 49 Pogodbe.
This Directive does not concern the application of Articles 28 to 30 of the Treaty relating to the free movement of goods.
Ta direktiva ne zadeva uporabe členov 28 do 30 Pogodbe o prostem pretoku blaga.
The restrictions prohibited pursuant to the provision on the freedom to provide services cover the requirements applicable to access to service activities or to the exercise thereof and not those applicable to goods as such.
Prepovedane omejitve v skladu z določbo o svobodi opravljanja storitev zadevajo zahteve glede začetka opravljanja ali opravljanja storitvenih dejavnosti in ne zahtev, ki veljajo za blago kot tako.
Where an operator travels to another Member State to exercise a service activity there, a distinction should be made between situations covered by the freedom of establishment and those covered, due to the temporary nature of the activities concerned, by the free movement of services.
Če izvajalec dejavnosti odpotuje v drugo državo članico, da bi tam opravljal storitveno dejavnost, bi bilo treba razlikovati med razmerami, ki sodijo v svobodo ustanavljanja, in tistimi, ki zaradi prehodne narave zadevne dejavnosti sodijo v prosti pretok storitev.
As regards the distinction between the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services, according to the case law of the Court of Justice the key element is whether or not the operator is established in the Member State where it provides the service concerned.
Pri razlikovanju med svobodo ustanavljanja in prostim pretokom storitev je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča ključno vprašanje, ali ima izvajalec dejavnosti sedež v državi članici, kjer opravlja zadevno storitev, ali ne.
If the operator is established in the Member State where it provides its services, it should come under the scope of application of the freedom of establishment.
Če ima sedež v državi članici, kjer opravlja svoje storitve, bi morala zanj veljati uporaba svobode ustanavljanja.
If, by contrast, the operator is not established in the Member State where the service is provided, its activities should be covered by the free movement of services.
Če pa izvajalec dejavnosti nima sedeža v državi članici, kjer opravlja storitev, bi morale njegove dejavnosti soditi na področje prostega pretoka storitev.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that the temporary nature of the activities in question should be determined in the light not only of the duration of the provision of the service, but also of its regularity, periodical nature or continuity.
Na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča se za določanje začasnega značaja storitve ne bi smelo upoštevati le trajanje storitve, ampak tudi pogostost, rednost ponovitve ali neprekinjenost storitve.
The fact that the activity is temporary should not mean that the provider may not equip itself with some forms of infrastructure in the Member State where the service is provided, such as an office, chambers or consulting rooms, in so far as such infrastructure is necessary for the purposes of providing the service in question.
Začasni značaj storitve v nobenem primeru ne bi smel pomeniti, da ponudnik storitve v državi članici gostiteljici ne sme imeti določene infrastrukture (pri tem gre lahko za pisarno, odvetniško pisarno ali posvetovalnice), kolikor je ta potrebna za opravljanje zadevne storitve.