natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
New appointments should therefore be made,
Zaradi tega je treba izvesti nova imenovanja –
The following are hereby appointed members of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 March 2006 to 29 February 2012:
Za člane Računskega sodišča so za obdobje od 1. marca 2006 do 29. februarja 2012 imenovani:
Mr Olavi ALA-NISSILÄ,
gospod Olavi ALA-NISSILÄ,
Ms Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN,
gospa Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN,
Mr Lars HEIKENSTEN,
gospod Lars HEIKENSTEN,
Mr Morten Louis LEVYSOHN,
gospod Morten Louis LEVYSOHN,
Mr Karel PINXTEN,
gospod Karel PINXTEN,
Mr Juan RAMALLO MASSANET,
gospod Juan RAMALLO MASSANET,
Mr Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA,
gospod Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA,
Mr Massimo VARI.
gospod Massimo VARI.
Opinions delivered on 13 December 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 13. decembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India
o sprejetju ponujenih zavez v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi ukrepi glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic anti-dumping Regulation), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), in zlasti člena 8 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the basic anti-subsidy Regulation), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna protisubvenicijska uredba“), in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
In July 2002, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 [3] imposed definitive countervailing duties on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India.
Julija 2002 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1338/2002 [3] uvedel dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije.
On the same day, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 [4], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and India.
Hkrati je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1339/2002 [4] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije.
Within the framework of these proceedings, the Commission, by Decision 2002/611/EC [5] accepted a price undertaking offered by an Indian company, i.e. Kokan Synthetics and Chemicals Pvt Ltd (the company).
V okviru teh postopkov je Komisija s Sklepom 2002/611/ES [5] sprejela cenovno zavezo, ki jo je ponudila indijska družba Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd. („družba“).
In December 2003, the company informed the Commission that it wished to withdraw its undertaking voluntarily.
Decembra 2003 je družba obvestila Komisijo, da želi prostovoljno umakniti svojo zavezo.
Accordingly, the Commission Decision accepting the undertaking was repealed by Commission Decision 2004/255/EC [6].
V skladu s tem je bil sklep Komisije o sprejetju zaveze razveljavljen s Sklepom Komisije 2004/255/ES [6].
In February 2004, an anti-absorption investigation concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in China has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 236/2004 [7], which increased the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty for the People’s Republic of China from 21 % to 33,7 %.
Februarja 2004 je bila preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Kitajske sklenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 236/2004 [7], kar je povečalo stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve v Ljudski republiki Kitajski z 21 % na 33,7 %.
REQUEST FOR A REVIEW
ZAHTEVEK ZA PREGLED
In December 2004, the company lodged a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation respectively, limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of the reinstatement of its undertaking.
Decembra 2004 je družba vložila zahtevo za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 19 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe, ki je po obsegu omejen na proučitev ponovne vzpostavitve zaveze, ki jo ponuja družba.
The request contained sufficient evidence of a significant change in circumstances which had occurred since the company voluntarily withdrew its undertaking.
Zahtevek je vseboval dovolj dokazov za pomembno spremembo v okoliščinah, ki so nastale od takrat, ko je družba prostovoljno umaknila svojo zavezo.
The company therefore wished to offer again its original undertaking and submitted that, in view of the changes circumstances, such an undertaking would be both effective and workable.
Družba je zato želela ponovno ponuditi svojo izvorno zavezo in poudarila, da bi bila glede na spremenjene okoliščine, takšna zaveza tako učinkovita kakor uporabna.
A notice of initiation of a partial interim review was published in the Official Journal of the European Union accordingly [8].
Obvestilo o začetku delnega vmesnega pregleda je bilo glede na to objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [8].
ACCEPTANCE OF THE UNDERTAKING
SPREJETJE ZAVEZE
Details of the procedural aspects and findings of the review investigation are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 123/2006 [9] amending both, Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating, inter alia, in India.
Podrobnosti postopkovnih vidikov in ugotovitve preiskave v zvezi s pregledom so opredeljeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 123/2006 [9], ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 1338/2002 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in Uredbe (ES) št. 1339/2002 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
It is the conclusion of the investigation that the revised undertaking offered by the company can be accepted since it eliminates the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation.
S preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da se pregledana zaveza, ki jo je ponudila družba, lahko sprejme, saj odpravlja škodljive učinke dampinga in subvencioniranja.
In this revised offer, the company agreed to index the minimum price originally offered in order to address the cyclical nature of the price of one of the key ingredients used in the production of sulphanilic acid.
V tej pregledani ponudbi se družba strinja, da bo navedla izvorno ponujeno minimalno ceno, zato da bo lahko upoštevala ciklično naravo cene ene ključnih sestavin pri proizvajanju sulfanilne kisline.
The company will also provide the Commission with regular and detailed information concerning its exports to the Community, meaning that the undertaking can be monitored effectively by the Commission.
Družba bo Komisiji posredovala tudi redne in podrobne informacije o svojem izvozu v Skupnost, kar pomeni, da bo lahko Komisija zavezo učinkovito nadzorovala.
Furthermore, the sales structure of this company is such that the Commission considers the risk of circumventing the agreed undertaking is limited.
Poleg tega ima ta družba tako prodajno strukturo, da je po mnenju Komisije nevarnost neuresničevanja dogovorjene zaveze omejena.
In view of this, the undertaking is acceptable.
Zaradi tega je zaveza sprejemljiva.
In order to enable the Commission to monitor effectively the compliance with the undertaking, when the request for release for free circulation pursuant to the undertaking is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the duty will be conditional upon the presentation of an invoice containing at least the items of information listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) 123/2006.
Da bi Komisija lahko učinkovito spremljala izpolnjevanje zaveze družbe, kadar je zahtevek za sprostitev v prost pretok na podlagi zaveze predložen ustreznemu carinskemu organu, bo oprostitev dajatev možna le s predložitvijo računa, ki bo vseboval vsaj informacije, navedene v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 123/2006.
This level of information is also necessary to enable customs authorities to ascertain with sufficient precision that the shipment corresponds to the commercial documents.
Ta raven informacij je potrebna tudi zato, da lahko carinski organi z zadostno natančnostjo ugotovijo, ali pošiljka ustreza trgovinskim dokumentom.
Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate rate of countervailing and anti-dumping duty shall instead be payable.
Kadar tak račun ni predložen, ali kadar ne ustreza izdelku, predloženemu carinskim organom, se namesto tega plača ustrezna stopnja izravnalne in protidampinške dajatve.
To further ensure the effective respect of the undertaking, the importers have been made aware by the above Council Regulation that any violation of the undertaking may lead to the retrospective application of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty for the relevant transactions.
Zaradi zagotovitve učinkovitega spoštovanja zaveze, so bili uvozniki na podlagi zgoraj navedene uredbe Sveta opozorjeni, da vsaka kršitev zaveze lahko privede do naknadne uporabe protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za ustrezne transakcije.
In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking, or in case of withdrawal of acceptance of the undertaking by the Commission, the anti-dumping and countervailing duty imposed in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 15(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation shall automatically apply pursuant to Article 8(9) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 13(9) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation,
V primeru kršitve ali umika zaveze, ali v primeru umika sprejetja zaveze s strani Komisije, se protidampinška in izravnalna dajatev, uvedeni v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 15(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe, samodejno uporabita v skladu s členom 8(9) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 13(9) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The undertaking offered by the exporting producer mentioned below, in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India is hereby accepted.
Sprejme se zaveza, ki jo je ponudil spodaj navedeni proizvajalec izvoznik v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi postopki glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 492/2004 (OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p. 6).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 492/2004 (UL L 80, 18.3.2004, str. 6).
OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 11.
UL L 196, 25.7.2002, str. 11.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 492/2004.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 492/2004.
OJ L 196, 25.7.2002, p. 36.
UL L 196, 25.7.2002, str. 36.
OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p. 29.
UL L 80, 18.3.2004, str. 29.
OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 17.
UL L 40, 12.2.2004, str. 17.
OJ C 101, 27.4.2005, p. 34.
UL C 101, 27.4.2005, str. 34.
See page 5 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 5 tega uradnega lista.
amending Commission Decision 1999/572/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceedings concerning imports of steel wire ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembi Sklepa 1999/572/ES o sprejetju zavez, ponujenih v zvezi s protidampinškimi postopki glede uvoza jeklenih žičnatih vrvi in kablov s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 8 in 9 Uredbe
In August 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 1796/1999 [2], the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of steel ropes and cables (the product concerned) originating, inter alia, in India.
Avgusta 1999 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1796/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz jeklenih vrvi in kablov („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
By Decision 1999/572/EC [3], the Commission accepted a price undertaking from an Indian company, i.e. Usha Martin Industries & Usha Beltron Ltd. This company has changed its name in the meantime and is now known as Usha Martin Ltd (UML).
S Sklepom 1999/572/ES [3] je Komisija sprejela cenovno zavezo indijske družbe Usha Martin Industries & Usha Beltron Ltd. Ta družba se je medtem preimenovala in je zdaj znana kot Usha Martin Ltd („UML“).
The change of name in no way affected the activities of the company.
Sprememba imena nikakor ni vplivala na dejavnosti družbe.
As a result, imports into the Community of the product concerned of Indian origin, produced by UML or by any other related company worldwide, and of a type covered by the undertaking (the product covered by the undertaking), were exempted from the definitive anti-dumping duties.
Zato sta bila uvoz v Skupnost zadevnega izdelka indijskega porekla, ki ga je proizvedla družba UML ali katera koli druga povezana družba, in vrste, ki jih zaveza zajema („izdelek, ki ga zaveza zajema“), izvzeta iz dokončnih protidampinških dajatev.
In this regard, it should be noted that certain types of steel wire rope currently produced by UML were not exported to the Community during the investigation period which led to the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures and were not, therefore, within the scope of the exemption afforded by the undertaking.
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti, da določene vrste jeklenih žičnatih vrvi, ki jih trenutno proizvaja UML, v obdobju preiskave niso bile izvožene v Skupnost, kar je privedlo do uvedbe dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov in zato niso zajete v izvzetje, ki jo omogoča zaveza.
Accordingly, such steel wire ropes were liable to the payment of the anti-dumping duty when entered for free circulation in the Community.
Tako so bile take jeklene žičnate vrvi zavezane plačilu protidampinške dajatve pri vstopu v prosti promet v Skupnosti.
In November 2005, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 121/2006 [4] decided that the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of the product concerned originating, inter alia, in India should be maintained.
Novembra 2005, po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe, je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 121/2006 [4] sklenil, da se protidampinški ukrepi, ki so se uporabljali za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije, ohranijo.
Obligations of companies with undertakings
Obveznosti družb z zavezami
The undertaking offered by UML obliges it (and any related company worldwide) to, inter alia, export the product covered by the undertaking to the first independent customer in the Community at or above certain minimum import price levels (MIPs) laid down in the undertaking.
Zaveza, ki jo je ponudila družba UML, jo zavezuje (in vse povezane družbe po svetu), da, med drugim, izvaža zadevni izdelek, ki ga zaveza zajema, prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti po določenih najnižjih ravneh uvozne cene („NUC“), določene v zavezi, ali nad njimi.
These price levels eliminate the injurious effects of dumping.
Te ravni cene odpravljajo škodljive učinke dampinga.
In the case of resales in the Community to the first independent customer by related importers, the resale prices of the product covered by the undertaking, after appropriate adjustments for selling, general and administrative costs and a reasonable profit, must also be at levels which eliminate the injurious effects of dumping.
V primeru nadaljnje prodaje povezanega uvoznika prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti morajo biti cene pri nadaljnji prodaji zadevnega izdelka, ki ga zaveza zajema, po ustreznih prilagoditvah prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov in razumnega dobička, prav tako na ravneh, ki odpravljajo škodljive učinke dampinga.
The terms of the undertaking also oblige UML to provide the Commission with regular and detailed information in the form of a quarterly report of its sales (and resales by its related parties in the Community) of the product concerned originating in India to the Community.
V okviru zaveze je družba UML obvezana, da Komisiji predloži redne in podrobne informacije v obliki četrtletnega poročila o svoji prodaji (in nadaljnji prodaji svojih povezanih strank v Skupnosti) zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost.
Such reports are intended to include the products covered by the undertaking which benefit from the exemption to the anti-dumping duty as well as those types of steel wire ropes not covered by the undertaking and which are therefore liable to the anti-dumping duty.
Namen takih poročil je vključiti izdelke, zajete v zavezi, ki imajo koristi od izvzetja od protidampinške dajatve, kakor tudi tiste vrste jeklenih žičnatih vrvi, ki jih zaveza ne zajema in ki so zato zavezane plačilu protidampinške dajatve.
Unless otherwise indicated, it is assumed by the Commission that the sales reports of UML (and the reports of resales of related companies established in the Community) are, as submitted, complete, exhaustive and correct in all particulars.
Če ni drugače navedeno, Komisija domneva, da so predložena poročila o prodaji družbe UML (in poročila o nadaljnji prodaji povezanih družb, ustanovljenih v Skupnosti) in vsi v njem navedeni podatki popolni, izčrpni in pravilni.
It was also acknowledged by UML that, with regard to the exemption to the anti-dumping duties afforded by the undertaking, such exemption is conditional upon presentation to Community customs services of an ‘Undertaking Invoice’.
Družba UML je tudi potrdila, da je glede na izvzetje od protidampinških dajatev, ki jih zaveza omogoča, tako izvzetje možno le s predložitvijo „računa na podlagi zaveze“ carinskim službam Skupnosti.
Moreover, the company undertook not to issue such Undertaking Invoices for sales of those types of the product concerned not covered by the undertaking and which are therefore liable to the anti-dumping duty.
Poleg tega se je družba zavezala, da takih računov na podlagi zaveze ne bo izdajala za prodajo tistih vrst zadevnega izdelka, ki jih zaveza ne zajema in ki so zato zavezane plačilu protidampinške dajatve.
It is also a condition of the undertaking that the terms and provisions thereof apply to any related company to UML, worldwide.
Pogoj zaveze je tudi, da se pogoji in določbe, ki izhajajo iz nje, uporabljajo za vse povezane družbe UML po svetu.
For the purposes of ensuring compliance with the undertaking, UML also agreed to provide all information considered necessary by the Commission and to allow on-spot verification visits at its premises, and those of any related companies, in order to verify the accuracy and veracity of data submitted in the said quarterly reports.
Za potrebe zagotovitve skladnosti z zavezo se je družba UML prav tako strinjala, da bo zagotovila vse informacije, ki so za Komisijo pomembne, in dovolila preveritvene obiske na kraju samem v svojih prostorih in v prostorih povezanih družb za preveritev točnosti in verodostojnosti predloženih podatkov v navedenih četrtletnih poročilih.
In this regard, verification visits were carried out at the premises of UML in India and at those of a related company to UML in Dubai, i.e. Brunton Wolf Wire Ropes FZE (BWWR).
Glede na to so bili opravljeni preveritveni obiski v prostorih UML v Indiji in v prostorih povezanih družb UML v Dubaju, in sicer v prostorih družbe Brunton Wolf Wire Ropes FZE („BWWR“).
Results of the verification visit to UML
Rezultati preveritvenih obiskov družbe UML
Examination of the company’s accounting records showed that significant volumes of the product concerned not covered by the undertaking had not been included in the quarterly undertaking sales reports submitted to the Commission.
Preveritev računovodske evidence družbe je pokazala, da znatna količina zadevnega izdelka, ki ga zaveza ne zajema, ni bila vključena v četrtletno poročilo o prodaji, predloženo Komisiji.
Furthermore, the goods in question had been sold by UML to its related importers in the UK and Denmark and included on Undertaking Invoices.
Poleg tega je družba UML zadevno blago prodala svojemu povezanemu uvozniku v Združenem kraljestvu in na Danskem in ga dodala na račune na podlagi zaveze.
It is considered that the omission of the sales in question from the sales reports and their incorrect inclusion on Undertaking Invoices constitute breaches of the undertaking.
Dejstvo, da je družba zadevno prodajo izpustila v poročilih o prodaji in jo napačno dodala na račune na podlagi zaveze, pomeni kršitve zaveze.
Results of the verification visit to BWWR
Rezultati preveritvenih obiskov družbe BWWR
It should first be noted that finished steel wire rope produced by BWWR has previously gone through two main production stages, namely: (i) a given number of individual steel wires are first twisted into what is known as a ‘stranded wire’, and (ii) a given number of such stranded wires formed from individual steel wires are then twisted together to form the finished steel wire rope.
Najprej je treba opomniti, da je končna jeklena žičnata vrv, ki jo proizvaja družba BWWR, šla sprva skozi dve glavni fazi proizvodnje, namreč (i) določeno število posameznih jeklenih vrvi se najprej zvije v tako imenovano „pramenasto žico“, in (ii) določeno število takih pramenastih žic, sestavljenih iz posameznih jeklenih vrvi, se nato zvije skupaj v obliko končne jeklene žičnate vrvi.
The verification at the premises of BWWR established that significant quantities of stranded wire of Indian origin had been sold by UML to BWWR and that BWWR had transformed this stranded wire into steel wire rope, some of which was then sold to the Community and exported as having United Arab Emirates (UAE) origin.
Pri pregledu v prostorih družbe BWWR je bilo ugotovljeno, da je družba UML znatne količine pramenaste žice indijskega porekla prodala družbi BWWR in da je slednja to pramenasto žico predelala v jekleno žičnato vrv, in nekaj jih je bilo nato prodanih v Skupnost in izvoženih, kot da so s poreklom iz Združenih arabskih emiratov („ZAE“).
In view of this transformation process, it was considered necessary to examine the question of the origin of the steel wire rope sold to the Community by BWWR.
Glede na ta proces predelave se je zdelo potrebno proučiti vprašanje glede porekla jeklene žičnate vrvi, ki jo je družba BWWR prodala v Skupnost.
Reference was therefore made to Article 22 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code [5] (the Community Customs Code), which provides that the non-preferential rules of origin apply to measures other than tariff measures established by Community provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods, such as anti-dumping measures.
Zato se je upošteval člen 22 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 [5] z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti („carinski zakonik Skupnosti“), ki določa, da se pravilo o nepreferencialnem poreklu blaga ne uporablja za ukrepe, kot so tarifni ukrepi, določeni s posebnimi določbami Skupnosti na področju blagovne menjave, kot so protidampinški ukrepi.