natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the product types exported to the Community where no comparable types sold on the domestic market were found, normal value was constructed on the basis of the costs of manufacturing incurred by the applicant for the exported product types in question plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs and profits in accordance with Article 2(3) and 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste izdelkov, izvožene v Skupnost, za katere ni bilo ugotovljene nobene vrste, ki bi se prodajala na domačem trgu, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana na podlagi stroškov izdelave, ki jih je imel vlagatelj za vrste izvoženih zadevnih izdelkov skupaj z razumnim zneskom za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške in za dobiček, v skladu s členom 2(3) in 2(6) osnovne uredbe.
The general and administrative costs were based on the applicant's domestic sales of the like product.
Splošni in administrativni stroški so temeljili na vlagateljevi domači prodaji podobnega izdelka.
The profit margin was based on the applicant's domestic sales of the like product made in the ordinary course of trade.
Stopnja dobička je temeljila na vlagateljevi domači prodaji podobnega izdelka pri običajnem poteku trgovine.
Since all export sales of the product concerned were made directly to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established on the basis of such prices paid or payable, in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation.
Ker je bila izvozna prodaja zadevnega izdelka opravljena neposredno neodvisnim odjemalcem v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določena na podlagi takšnih plačanih ali plačljivih cen.
The comparison of normal value with export price was made on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno je bila narejena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovine.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability, i.e. transport costs, insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit costs and commissions.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, se je upoštevalo, v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe, razlike pri dejavnikih, za katere se je trdilo in pokazalo, da so vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen, tj. pri stroških transporta, zavarovanja, manipuliranja, natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških posojil in provizijah.
The comparison was made between the weighted average adjusted normal value per product type and the weighted average net ex-works export price for the comparable product type, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Primerjava je bila narejena med tehtanim povprečjem prilagojene normalne vrednosti za vrsto izdelka in tehtanim povprečjem neto izvozne cene franko tovarna za primerljivo vrsto izdelka, v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
The comparison as described above did not show the existence of any dumping.
Primerjava, kakor je opisana zgoraj, ni pokazala obstoj dampinga.
LASTING NATURE OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES
TRAJNOST SPREMENJENIH OKOLIŠČIN
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances could reasonably be said to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe se je preučevalo tudi, ali se za spremenjene okoliščine lahko reče, da so trajne.
In this respect, the investigation revealed that the applicant has undergone structural changes affecting considerably the production structure and organisation, resulting in a substantially higher production efficiency that led to a drop in production costs and thus reduced normal value as compared to the investigation period used in the previous investigation (1 April 1999 until 31 March 2000).
V tem pogledu je preiskava pokazala, da je vlagatelj opravil strukturne spremembe, ki so bistveno vplivale na proizvodno strukturo in organizacijo, kar je imelo za posledico bistveno višjo učinkovitost proizvodnje, ki je privedla do znižanja proizvodnih stroškov in s tem do zmanjšanja normalne vrednosti v primerjavi z obdobjem preiskave prejšnje preiskave (od 1. aprila 1999 do 31. marca 2000).
During the same period, export prices have increased and no reason was found to indicate that this increase was temporary.
V tem obdobju so se izvozne cene povečale in ni bilo nobenega razloga, ki bi navajal na to, da je bilo to povečanje začasno.
It is consequently concluded that the changed circumstances, in particular the increase in export prices to the Community combined with a substantial decrease in production costs, are of a lasting nature.
Zato se sklene, da so spremenjene okoliščine, zlasti povečanje izvoznih cen v Skupnost v povezavi s precejšnjim znižanjem proizvodnih stroškov, trajne.
In the absence of dumping, it is therefore considered appropriate to repeal the measures insofar as they concern the applicant.
Ker damping ni bil ugotovljen, se zato šteje, da je primerno odpraviti ukrepe, v kolikor ti zadevajo vlagatelja.
The interested parties were informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 and were given an opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo Uredbe (ES) št. 1601/2001 in dana jim je bila možnost, da dajo pripombe.
Subsequently, EWRIS submitted some general comments relating mainly to increasing prices of raw materials after the investigation period.
Nato je EWRIS predložil nekaj splošnih pripomb, ki se v glavnem nanašajo na povečanje cen surovin po obdobju preiskave.
EWRIS did not put in question the findings concerning dumping as outlined above, but nevertheless expressed concern about the possibility that the applicant may resume dumping in the future.
EWRIS ni izpodbijal ugotovitev glede dampinga, kot je bil predstavljen zgoraj, vendar je izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi možnosti, da lahko vlagatelj nadaljuje z dampingom v prihodnosti.
Concerning the prices of raw materials, it is noted that the prices of raw materials may have increased after the investigation period, but this could not have been taken into account in the dumping calculation for the applicant.
Glede cen surovin se ugotavlja, da so se cene surovin lahko povečale po obdobju preiskave, vendar se to ni moglo upoštevati pri izračunu stopnje dampinga pri vlagatelju.
In this case, the main raw material is wire rod, a basic steel product, which is a commodity with prices normally fluctuating within short periods.
V tem primeru je glavna surovina valjana žica, osnovni izdelek iz jekla, ki je bazični proizvod, za katerega cene običajno nihajo v kratkih časovnih obdobjih.
Therefore, any price increase of such raw material cannot be considered to be of a lasting nature, which could put into question the above findings.
Zato se vsakršno povečanje cen takšne surovine ne more upoštevati kot trajno, kar bi lahko izpodbijalo zgornje ugotovitve.
Finally, it should be noted that, since the repeal of the measures concerns only the applicant, and not Turkey as a whole, the applicant remains subject to the proceeding and may be reinvestigated in any subsequent review carried out for Turkey pursuant to Article 11(6) of the basic Regulation,
Ker odprava ukrepov zadeva samo vlagatelja in ne Turčije kot celote, je treba nazadnje upoštevati, da za vlagatelja še velja postopek in je lahko ponovno predmet preiskave v kakršnem koli naknadnem pregledu, izvedenem za Turčijo v skladu s členom 11(6) osnovne uredbe –
Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1602/2001 se spremeni kot sledi:
In the table of Article 1(3) the rate of duty (%) for the company Has Çelik ve Halat Sanayi Ticaret A.S.
V preglednici člena 1(3) se stopnja dajatve (%) za gospodarsko družbo v Turčiji Has Çelik ve Halat Sanayi Ticaret A.S.
(TARIC additional code A220) shall be replaced by the following:
(dodatna oznaka TARIC A220) nadomesti z naslednjim:
OJ C 127, 5.5.2000, p. 12.
UL C 127, 5.5.2000, str. 12.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1268/2003 (OJ L 180, 18.7.2003, p. 23).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št 1268/2003 (UL L 180, 18.7.2003, str. 23).
OJ C 67, 17.3.2004, p. 5.
UL C 67, 17.3.2004, str. 5.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 565/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 565/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 April 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 15. aprila 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 14 April 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 14. aprila 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 566/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 566/2005
The rates of the refunds applicable from 24 March 2005 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 468/2005 [2].
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 24. marca 2005 uporablajo za proizvode, navedene v Prilogi, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi, so bile določene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 468/2005 [2].
It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 468/2005 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,
Iz uporabe pravil in meril iz Uredbe (ES) št. 468/2005 za informacije, ki so trenutno na razpolago Komisiji, izhaja, da je izvozna nadomestila, ki se trenutno uporabljajo, treba spremeniti v skladu s Prilogo k Uredbi –
The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 468/2005 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.
Stopnje nadomestil, določene z Uredbo (ES) št. 468/2005, se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k Uredbi.
OJ L 78, 24.3.2005, p. 9.
UL L 78, 24.3.2005, str. 9.
Rates of the refunds applicable from 15 April 2005 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil od 15. aprila 2005 za nekatere mlečne izdelke, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 567/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 567/2005
setting, for the 2004/2005 marketing year, the amounts to be paid to olive oil producer organisations and associations thereof recognised under Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC
o določitvi zneskov za tržno leto 2004/2005, ki se plačajo organizacijam proizvajalcev oljčnega olja in njihovim združenjem, ki so odobrene po Uredbi Sveta št. 136/66/EGS
Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in oils and fats [1], and in particular Article 20d(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 136/66/EGS z dne 22. septembra 1966 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve trga za olja in masti [1] in zlasti člena 20d(4) Uredbe,
Article 20d(1) of Regulation No 136/66/EEC provides for a percentage of production aid to be withheld to help finance the work of recognised producer organisations and associations thereof.
Člen 20d(1) Uredbe št. 136/66/EGS predvideva odstotek proizvodne pomoči, ki se zadrži kot pomoč za financiranje dela odobrenih organizacij proizvajalcev in njihovih združenj.
For the 1998/1999, 1999/2000, 2000/2001, 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 marketing years that percentage is 0,8 %.
Ta odstotek za tržna leta 1998/1999 do 2004/2005 znaša 0,8 %.
Under Article 21(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2366/98 of 30 October 1998 [2] laying down detailed rules for the application of the system of production aid for olive oil for the 1998/1999, 1999/2000, 2000/2001, 2001/2002, 2002/2003, 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 marketing years, the unit amounts to be paid to producer organisations and associations thereof are to be fixed on the basis of the forecasts of the overall sum to be distributed.
Člen 21(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2366/98 z dne 30. oktobra 1998 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema proizvodne pomoči za oljčno olje za tržna leta od 1998/1999 do 2004/2005 [2] določa, da so zneski na enoto, ki naj se plačajo organizacijam proizvajalcev in njihovim združenjem, določeni na osnovi napovedi celotnega razpoložljivega zneska.
The funds that will become available in each Member State as a result of the amount withheld as referred to above must be distributed in an appropriate way among those eligible.
Sredstva, ki bodo na razpolago v vsaki državi članici kot posledica zadržanega zneska, kot je navedeno zgoraj, je treba na primeren način razdeliti med upravičence.
For the 2004/2005 marketing year, the amounts provided for in Article 21(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 2366/98 shall be as follows:
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 so zneski, predvideni v členu 21(1)(a) in (b) Uredbe (ES) št. 2366/98, v tem zaporedju:
for Greece EUR 2,0 and EUR 2,0 respectively
za Grčijo 2,0 EUR in 2,0 EUR
for Spain EUR 4,5 and EUR 2,2 respectively
za Španijo 4,5 EUR in 2,2 EUR
for France EUR 0,0 and EUR 0,0 respectively
za Francijo 0,0 EUR in 0,0 EUR
for Italy EUR 2,0 and EUR 2,2 respectively
za Italijo 2,0 EUR in 2,2 EUR
for Malta EUR 0,0 and EUR 0,0 respectively
za Malto 0,0 EUR in 0,0 EUR
for Portugal EUR 0,0 and EUR 6,5 respectively
za Portugalsko 0,0 EUR in 6,5 EUR
for Slovenia EUR 0,0 and EUR 0,0 respectively
za Slovenijo 0,0 EUR in 0,0 EUR
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 865/2004 (OJ L 161, 30.4.2004, p. 97).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št 865/2004 (UL L 161, 30.4.2004, str. 97).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 568/2005
Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 568/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 laying down detailed rules of application for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years for the import of cane sugar under certain tariff quotas and preferential agreements and amending Regulations (EC) No 1464/95 and (EC) No 779/96
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003 o podrobnih pravilih uporabe za uvoz trsnega sladkorja v okviru določenih carinskih kvot in preferencialnih sporazumov za tržna leta 2003/2004, 2004/2005 in 2005/2006 in o spremembi Uredb (ES) št. 1464/95 in (ES) št. 779/96
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector [1], and in particular Articles 22(2) and 39(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/2001 z dne 19. junija 2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor [1] in zlasti členov 22(2) ter 39(6) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1095/96 of 18 June 1996 on the implementation of the concessions set out in Schedule CXL drawn up in the wake of the conclusion of the GATT XXIV.6 negotiations [2], and in particular Article 1 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1095/96 z dne 18. junija 1996 o izvajanju koncesij, določenih v Seznamu CXL, sestavljenem po zaključku pogajanj v okviru člena XXIV:6 GATT [2], in zlasti člena 1 Uredbe,
Experience gained during the 2003/04 marketing year, which was the first period of application of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 [3], has shown that the common detailed rules of application laid down by that Regulation need to be improved, in particular as regards the method of determining the quantities of the delivery obligations for ACP-India preferential sugar.
Izkušnja o uporabi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1159/2003 [3] v tržnem letu 2003/2004, ki je bilo prvo obdobje dobave, je pokazala, da je treba izboljšati podrobna pravila za uporabo iz navedene uredbe, zlasti kar zadeva metodo določitve količin obveznosti dobave za preferenčni sladkor s poreklom iz AKP - Indije.
To guarantee the predictability required for the smooth running of commercial transactions the Commission, before the start of the delivery period concerned, should provisionally determine the quantities of the delivery obligations in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
Za zagotovitev predvidljivosti, potrebne za gladko potekanje komercialnih dejavnosti, mora Komisija pred pričetkom obdobja zadevne dobave začasno določiti količine obveznosti dobave po postopku iz člena 42(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001.
During the delivery period, once more details are known about the quantities actually delivered in the previous years, these quantities should be fixed subject to possible amendment when the exact figures are available.
Med dobavo, ko so podrobnosti o količinah, dostavljenih v predhodnih letih, na voljo, je treba določiti te količine ob upoštevanju morebitne spremembe, ko so na voljo točni podatki.
Without prejudice to investigations to be carried out, a method should also be adopted to process, when determining the quantities of the delivery obligations, the nominal quantities of import licences for which it has not been possible to establish the actual import into the Community.
Brez vpliva na preiskave, ki jih je treba izvesti, je treba v okviru določitve količin obveznosti dobave določiti tudi metodo za obravnavo nominalnih količin uvoznih dovoljenj, za katera ni bilo mogoče določiti dejanskega uvoza v Skupnost.
Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1159/2003 je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti.
Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 is hereby replaced by the following:
Člen 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The Commission shall determine, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001, the quantities of the delivery obligations for each exporting country concerned, in accordance with Articles 3 and 7 of the ACP Protocol, Articles 3 and 7 of the Agreement with India, and Articles 11 and 12 of this Regulation.
Komisija po postopku iz člena 42(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 določi količine obveznosti dobave za vsako zadevno državo izvoznico v skladu s členoma 3 in 7 Protokola AKP, členoma 3 in 7 Sporazuma z Indijo in členoma 11 in 12 te uredbe.
The quantities of the delivery obligations for a delivery period:
Določitev količin obveznosti dobave za eno obdobje dobave:
shall be determined provisionally before 1 May preceding the period in question;
je določena začasno pred 1. majem pred zadevnim obdobjem;
shall be adopted before 1 February of the period in question;
je sprejeta pred 1. februarjem zadevnega obdobja;
shall occasionally be adjusted during the period in question if necessary as a result of new information, in particular to resolve duly justified specific cases.
je po potrebi prilagojena med zadevnim obdobjem, če novi podatki to zahtevajo, in zlasti za razrešitev ustrezno utemeljenih posebnih primerov.
The delivery obligations taken into account for the issue of licences as referred to in Article 4 shall be equal to the quantities determined under the first paragraph hereto, adjusted, if necessary, in line with the decisions taken under Articles 3 and 7 of the ACP Protocol and of the Agreement with India.
Obveznosti dobave, ki se upoštevajo za izdajo dovoljenj iz člena 4, so enake količinam, določenim na podlagi prvega pododstavka, po potrebi prilagojene v skladu s sklepi, sprejetimi v skladu s členoma 3 in 7 Protokola AKP in Sporazuma z Indijo.
The quantities of delivery obligations shall be determined in accordance with Articles 3 and 7 of the ACP Protocol, Articles 3 and 7 of the Agreement with India, and Articles 11 and 12 of this Regulation, taking into account in particular:
Količine obveznosti dobave so določene v skladu s členoma 3 in 7 Protokola AKP, členoma 3 in 7 Sporazuma z Indijo in tudi členoma 11 in 12 te uredbe, zlasti ob upoštevanju:
the deliveries actually recorded over the preceding delivery periods;
dobav, dejansko zavedenih v obdobju prejšnjih dobav;
the quantities declared as quantities which could not be delivered, in accordance with Article 7 of the ACP Protocol and of the Agreement with India.
količin, prijavljenih kot količine, ki niso mogle biti dobavljene, v skladu s členom 7 Protokola AKP in Sporazuma z Indijo.
Where the nominal quantities for which import licences have been issued exceed the quantities of deliveries actually recorded in the previous delivery periods, without prejudice to the results of the investigations to be carried out by the competent authorities, the nominal quantities of the licences for which it has not been possible to establish the actual import into the Community shall be added to the quantities referred to in point (a) of the first paragraph.
Če nominalne količine, za katere so bila izdana uvozna dovoljenja, presegajo količine dobave, dejansko zabeležene za prejšnja obdobja dobave, ne glede na rezultate preiskave, ki jih morajo izvesti pristojni organi, se nominalne količine dovoljenj, za katere se dejanski uvoz v Skupnost ni mogel ugotoviti, dodajo količinam iz točke (a) prvega pododstavka.
The adjustments referred to in paragraph 2(c) may comprise transfers of quantities between two consecutive delivery periods provided that this does not disrupt the supply arrangements referred to in Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001.
Prilagoditve iz točke (c) odstavka 2 lahko vključujejo prenose količin med obdobjema zaporedne dobave, če to ne povzroči motenj pri preskrbi, kakor je navedeno v členu 39 Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001.
The total for each delivery period of the quantities of the delivery obligations for the different exporting countries concerned shall be imported as preferential ACP-India sugar under the delivery obligations at zero duty.
Celotne količine obveznosti dobave za vsako dobavno obdobje za različne zadevne države izvoznice se uvozijo kot preferenčni sladkor s poreklom iz AKP-Indije v okviru obveznosti dobave po dajatvi nič.
The delivery obligation for the 2003/04, 2004/05 and 2005/06 marketing years shall bear the following serial number: “ACP-India preferential sugar”: No 09.4321.’
Obveznost dobave za tržna leta 2003/2004, 2004/2005 in 2005/2006 ima naslednjo številko naročila: ‚preferenčni sladkor s poreklom iz AKP-Indija: št. 09.4321’.“.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16.)
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 39/2004 (UL L 6, 10.1.2004, str. 16).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 569/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 569/2005
establishing a transitional measure for the 2004/2005 marketing year on funding the storage of cereals offered for intervention in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia
o uvedbi prehodnega ukrepa za tržno leto 2004/2005 v zvezi s financiranjem skladiščenja žit za intervencijo na Češkem, v Estoniji, na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi, na Madžarskem, Poljskem, v Sloveniji in na Slovaškem
At the request of certain Member States, Commission Regulation (EC) No 495/2005 [2] extends by three months, for the 2004/2005 marketing year, the deadline for delivering cereals offered for intervention in the Member States which joined the European Community on 1 May 2004, although it does not authorise delivery beyond 31 July 2005.
Na zahtevo nekaterih držav članic Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 495/2005 [2] za tržno leto 2004/2005 za tri mesece podaljša rok za prevzem žit, ponujenih v intervencijo v državah članicah, ki so se priključile Evropski uniji 1. maja 2004, vendar ne dovoljuje prevzema po 31. juliju 2005.