natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The concept of ‘overriding reasons relating to the public interest’ to which reference is made in certain provisions of this Directive has been developed by the Court of Justice in its case law in relation to Articles 43 and 49 of the Treaty and may continue to evolve.
Pojem „pomembnih razlogov, ki se nanašajo na javni interes“, na katerega se sklicujejo nekatere določbe te direktive, je razvilo Sodišče v svoji sodni praksi v zvezi s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe in se lahko razvija še naprej.
The notion as recognised in the case law of the Court of Justice covers at least the following grounds: public policy, public security and public health, within the meaning of Articles 46 and 55 of the Treaty; the maintenance of order in society; social policy objectives; the protection of the recipients of services; consumer protection; the protection of workers, including the social protection of workers; animal welfare; the preservation of the financial balance of the social security system; the prevention of fraud; the prevention of unfair competition; the protection of the environment and the urban environment, including town and country planning; the protection of creditors; safeguarding the sound administration of justice; road safety; the protection of intellectual property; cultural policy objectives, including safeguarding the freedom of expression of various elements, in particular social, cultural, religious and philosophical values of society; the need to ensure a high level of education, the maintenance of press diversity and the promotion of the national language; the preservation of national historical and artistic heritage; and veterinary policy.
Pojem, kot ga v sodni praksi priznava Sodišče, zajema vsaj naslednje razloge: javni red, javno varnost in javno zdravje v smislu členov 46 in 55 Pogodbe; vzdrževanje reda v družbi; cilje socialne politike; varstvo prejemnikov storitev; varstvo potrošnikov; varstvo delavcev, vključno s socialnim varstvom delavcev; dobro počutje živali; ohranjanje finančnega ravnovesja sistema socialne varnosti; preprečevanje goljufij; preprečevanje nelojalne konkurence; varstvo okolja in mestnega okolja, vključno s prostorskim načrtovanjem; varstvo upnikov; zaščito poštenega sodnega sistema; cestnoprometno varnost; varstvo intelektualne lastnine; cilje kulturne politike, vključno z zaščito svobode izražanja različnih pojmovanj, zlasti socialnih, kulturnih, verskih in filozofskih vrednot v družbi; potrebo po zagotovitvi visoke ravni izobraževanja, ohranjanje pluralnosti medijev in uveljavljanje nacionalnega jezika; ohranjanje nacionalne zgodovinske in umetnostne dediščine; in veterinarsko politiko.
The concept of ‘public policy’, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, covers the protection against a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society and may include, in particular, issues relating to human dignity, the protection of minors and vulnerable adults and animal welfare.
Pojem „javnega reda“, kakor ga razlaga Sodišče, zajema zaščito pred dejansko in dovolj resno grožnjo kateremu izmed temeljnih interesov družbe in lahko vključuje zlasti zadeve v zvezi s človekovim dostojanstvom, varstvom mladoletnikov in ranljivih odraslih ter dobrim počutjem živali.
Similarly, the concept of public security includes issues of public safety.
Podobno pojem javne varnosti vključuje vprašanja javne varnosti.
The rules relating to administrative procedures should not aim at harmonising administrative procedures but at removing overly burdensome authorisation schemes, procedures and formalities that hinder the freedom of establishment and the creation of new service undertakings therefrom.
Namen predpisov o upravnih postopkih ne bi smel biti uskladitev upravnih postopkov, temveč odprava zelo zapletenih sistemov izdajanja dovoljenj ter postopkov in formalnosti, ki ovirajo svobodo ustanavljanja in posledično nastajanje novih storitvenih podjetij.
One of the fundamental difficulties faced, in particular by SMEs, in accessing service activities and exercising them is the complexity, length and legal uncertainty of administrative procedures.
Ena od glavnih težav, ki jih imajo pri začetku opravljanja in opravljanju storitvenih dejavnosti zlasti mala in srednja podjetja, so zapletenost, trajanje in pravna negotovost upravnih postopkov.
For this reason, following the example of certain modernising and good administrative practice initiatives undertaken at Community and national level, it is necessary to establish principles of administrative simplification, inter alia through the limitation of the obligation of prior authorisation to cases in which it is essential and the introduction of the principle of tacit authorisation by the competent authorities after a certain period of time elapsed.
Zato je po zgledu nekaterih pobud za posodobitev in dobro upravno prakso na ravni Skupnosti in nacionalni ravni treba vzpostaviti načela upravne poenostavitve, med drugim z omejevanjem obveznosti predhodnih dovoljenj na primere, ko je to bistvenega pomena, in z uvedbo načela dovoljenja na podlagi molka pristojnih organov po preteku določenega obdobja.
Such modernising action, while maintaining the requirements on transparency and the updating of information relating to operators, is intended to eliminate the delays, costs and dissuasive effects which arise, for example, from unnecessary or excessively complex and burdensome procedures, the duplication of procedures, the ‘red tape’ involved in submitting documents, the arbitrary use of powers by the competent authorities, indeterminate or excessively long periods before a response is given, the limited duration of validity of authorisations granted and disproportionate fees and penalties.
Takšno posodabljanje omogoča ohranitev preglednosti in ažurnost informacij o izvajalcih in je hkrati namenjeno odpravi zamud, stroškov in odvračilnih učinkov, ki nastanejo na primer zaradi nepotrebnih ali preveč zapletenih in obremenjujočih postopkov, podvajanja postopkov, birokracije pri predložitvi dokumentov, uporabe samovoljnih pooblastil pristojnih organov, nedoločenih ali predolgih obdobij čakanja na odgovor, omejenega trajanja veljavnosti izdanih dovoljenj ter nesorazmernih stroškov in kazni.
Such practices have particularly significant dissuasive effects on providers wishing to develop their activities in other Member States and require coordinated modernisation within an enlarged internal market of twenty-five Member States.
Taka praksa ima še posebno velik odvračilni učinek na ponudnike, ki želijo razvijati svojo dejavnost v drugih državah članicah, in zahteva usklajeno posodobitev znotraj razširjenega notranjega trga petindvajsetih držav članic.
Member States should introduce, where appropriate, forms harmonised at Community level, as established by the Commission, which will serve as an equivalent to certificates, attestations or any other document in relation to establishment.
Države članice po potrebi uvedejo obrazce, usklajene na ravni Skupnosti, ki jih je pripravila Komisija in ki bodo enakovredni spričevalom, potrdilom in vsem drugim dokumentom v zvezi z ustanavljanjem.
In order to examine the need for simplifying procedures and formalities, Member States should be able, in particular, to take into account their necessity, number, possible duplication, cost, clarity and accessibility, as well as the delay and practical difficulties to which they could give rise for the provider concerned.
Državam članicam bi moralo biti omogočeno pri preučevanju potrebe po poenostavitvi postopkov in formalnosti upoštevati zlasti njihovo nujnost, število, možno podvajanje, stroške, jasnost, dostopnost kot tudi zamudo in praktične težave, ki bi jih s postopki in formalnostmi lahko imel zadevni ponudnik storitev.
In order to facilitate access to service activities and the exercise thereof in the internal market, it is necessary to establish an objective, common to all Member States, of administrative simplification and to lay down provisions concerning, inter alia, the right to information, procedures by electronic means and the establishment of a framework for authorisation schemes.
Da bi olajšali dostop do storitvenih dejavnosti in opravljanje teh dejavnosti na notranjem trgu, je treba določiti cilj upravne poenostavitve, ki bi bil skupen vsem državam članicam, in hkrati predvideti določbe, ki se med drugim nanašajo na pravico do obveščenosti, postopke po elektronski poti in pripravo okvira sistemov dovoljenj.
Other measures adopted at national level to meet that objective could involve reduction of the number of procedures and formalities applicable to service activities and the restriction of such procedures and formalities to those which are essential in order to achieve a general interest objective and which do not duplicate each other in terms of content or purpose.
Drugi ukrepi za dosego tega cilja, sprejeti na nacionalni ravni, lahko vključujejo zmanjšanje števila postopkov in formalnosti, ki se uporabljajo za storitvene dejavnosti, ter omejevanje postopkov in formalnosti, ki so bistveni za dosego cilja splošnega pomena in se med seboj ne podvajajo glede vsebine ali namena.
With the aim of administrative simplification, general formal requirements, such as presentation of original documents, certified copies or a certified translation, should not be imposed, except where objectively justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest, such as the protection of workers, public health, the protection of the environment or the protection of consumers.
Da bi se poenostavili upravni postopki, se ne sme določati splošnih formalnih pogojev, kot je predložitev izvirnikov dokumentov, overjenih kopij ali overjenega prevoda, razen kadar so objektivno utemeljeni s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, kot je zaščita delavcev, javno zdravje, varstvo okolja ali varstvo potrošnikov.
It is also necessary to ensure that an authorisation as a general rule permits access to, or exercise of, a service activity throughout the national territory, unless a new authorisation for each establishment, for example for each new hypermarket, or an authorisation that is restricted to a specific part of the national territory is objectively justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Prav tako je treba zagotoviti, da dovoljenje praviloma dovoljuje začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti na celotnem nacionalnem ozemlju, razen če sta novo dovoljenje za vsako ustanovitev sedeža, na primer za vsak nov hipermarket, ali omejitev dovoljenja na določen del nacionalnega ozemlja objektivno utemeljena s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
In order to further simplify administrative procedures, it is appropriate to ensure that each provider has a single point through which he can complete all procedures and formalities (hereinafter referred to as ‘points of single contact’).
Da bi se še nadalje poenostavili upravni postopki, je potrebno, da ima ponudnik eno mesto, na katerem opravi vse postopke in formalnosti (v nadaljevanju „enotne kontaktne točke“).
The number of points of single contact per Member State may vary according to regional or local competencies or according to the activities concerned.
Število enotnih kontaktnih točk v državah članicah se lahko razlikuje glede na regionalne in lokalne pristojnosti ali glede na zadevne dejavnosti.
The creation of points of single contact should not interfere with the allocation of functions among competent authorities within each national system.
Vzpostavitev enotnih kontaktnih točk ne bi smela posegati v delitev funkcij med pristojnimi organi posameznega nacionalnega sistema.
Where several authorities at regional or local level are competent, one of them may assume the role of point of single contact and coordinator.
Kadar je na regionalni ali lokalni ravni pristojnih več organov, lahko eden od njih prevzame vlogo enotne kontaktne točke in koordinatorja.
Points of single contact may be set up not only by administrative authorities but also by chambers of commerce or crafts, or by the professional organisations or private bodies to which a Member State decides to entrust that function.
Enotne kontaktne točke lahko ustanovijo ne le upravni organi, temveč tudi gospodarska ali obrtna zbornica ali poklicne organizacije ali zasebni organi, katerim država članica poveri navedeno funkcijo.
Points of single contact have an important role to play in providing assistance to providers either as the authority directly competent to issue the documents necessary to access a service activity or as an intermediary between the provider and the authorities which are directly competent.
Enotne kontaktne točke imajo pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju pomoči izvajalcem kot organ, ki je neposredno pristojen za izdajo potrebnih dokumentov za začetek opravljanja storitvene dejavnosti ali kot posrednik med izvajalcem in neposredno pristojnimi organi.
The fee which may be charged by points of single contact should be proportionate to the cost of the procedures and formalities with which they deal.
Pristojbina, ki jo lahko zaračunajo enotne kontaktne točke, bi morala biti sorazmerna stroškom postopkov in formalnosti, s katerimi se ukvarjajo.
This should not prevent Member States from entrusting the points of single contact with the collection of other administrative fees, such as the fee of supervisory bodies.
To državam članicam ne bi smelo preprečiti, da enotne kontaktne točke ne pooblastijo za zaračunavanje drugih upravnih pristojbin, kot je pristojbina nadzornih organov.
It is necessary for providers and recipients of services to have easy access to certain types of information It should be for each Member State to determine, within the framework of this Directive, the way in which providers and recipients are provided with information.
Ponudniki in prejemniki storitev morajo imeti enostaven dostop do nekaterih vrst informacij. Način posredovanja informacij ponudnikom in prejemnikom bi morale v okviru te direktive določiti države članice same.
In particular, the obligation on Member States to ensure that relevant information is easily accessible to providers and recipients and that it can be accessed by the public without obstacle could be fulfilled by making this information accessible through a website.
Predvsem obveznost držav članic, da zagotovijo, da so ustrezne informacije lahko dostopne ponudnikom in porabnikom ter da so javnosti dostopne neovirano, bi se lahko izvedlo preko dostopa do informacij preko spletne strani.
Any information given should be provided in a clear and unambiguous manner.
Vse posredovane informacije bi morale biti jasne in nedvoumne.
The information provided to providers and recipients of services should include, in particular, information on procedures and formalities, contact details of the competent authorities, conditions for access to public registers and data bases and information concerning available remedies and the contact details of associations and organisations from which providers or recipients can obtain practical assistance.
Informacije posredovane ponudnikom in prejemnikom storitev bi morale zlasti vključevati informacije o postopkih in formalnostih, kontaktne podatke o pristojnem organu, pogoje dostopa do javnih registrov in baz podatkov ter informacije o razpoložljivih pravnih sredstvih ter kontaktne podatke o združenjih in organizacijah, pri katerih lahko ponudniki in prejemniki dobijo praktično pomoč.
The obligation on competent authorities to assist providers and recipients should not include the provision of legal advice in individual cases.
Obveznost pristojnih organov pomagati ponudnikom in prejemnikom ne bi smela vključevati tudi pravnega svetovanja v posameznih primerih.
Nevertheless, general information on the way in which requirements are usually interpreted or applied should be given.
Kljub temu je treba zagotoviti splošne informacije o tem, kako se zahteve običajno razlagajo ali uporabljajo.
Issues such as liability for providing incorrect or misleading information should be determined by Member States.
Zadeve, kot je prevzemanje odgovornosti za posredovanje napačnih ali zavajajočih informacij, bi morale opredeliti države članice.
The setting up, in the reasonably near future, of electronic means of completing procedures and formalities will be vital for administrative simplification in the field of service activities, for the benefit of providers, recipients and competent authorities.
V bližnji prihodnosti bo nujno treba vzpostaviti elektronske oblike opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti, kar bo omogočilo upravno poenostavitev na področju storitvenih dejavnosti, ki bo koristila ponudnikom, prejemnikom in pristojnim organom.
In order to meet that obligation as to results, national laws and other rules applicable to services may need to be adapted.
Da bi izpolnili obveznost glede doseganja rezultatov, bo morda treba prilagoditi nacionalne zakone in druge predpise o storitvah, ki se uporabljajo na področju storitev.
This obligation should not prevent Member States from providing other means of completing such procedures and formalities, in addition to electronic means.
Ta obveznost ne preprečuje državam članicam, da poleg elektronskih zagotovijo še druga sredstva za opravljanje takih postopkov in formalnosti.
The fact that it must be possible to complete those procedures and formalities at a distance means, in particular, that Member States must ensure that they may be completed across borders.
Možnost opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti na daljavo pomeni predvsem to, da morajo države članice zagotoviti, da jih bo mogoče opravljati čezmejno.
The obligation as to results does not cover procedures or formalities which by their very nature are impossible to complete at a distance.
Obveznost glede doseganja rezultatov ne zajema postopkov ali formalnosti, ki jih zaradi njihove narave ni mogoče opravljati na daljavo.
Furthermore, this does not interfere with Member States' legislation on the use of languages.
Hkrati ne posega v zakonodajo držav članic o rabi jezikov.
The granting of licences for certain service activities may require an interview with the applicant by the competent authority in order to assess the applicant's personal integrity and suitability for carrying out the service in question.
Pri izdaji dovoljenj za nekatere storitvene dejavnosti lahko pristojni organ zahteva pogovor s prosilcem, namenjen oceni prosilčeve osebne integritete in primernosti za izvajanje zadevne storitve.
In such cases, the completion of formalities by electronic means may not be appropriate.
V takšnih primerih za izpolnjevanje formalnosti ni primerna elektronska oblika.
The possibility of gaining access to a service activity should be made subject to authorisation by the competent authorities only if that decision satisfies the criteria of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Možnost začetka opravljanja storitvene dejavnosti bi morala biti predmet odobritve pristojnih organov le, če so pri tej odločitvi izpolnjena merila glede nediskriminacije, nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
That means, in particular, that authorisation schemes should be permissible only where an a posteriori inspection would not be effective because of the impossibility of ascertaining the defects of the services concerned a posteriori, due account being taken of the risks and dangers which could arise in the absence of a prior inspection.
To zlasti pomeni, da so sistemi dovoljenj dopustni le, če naknadni nadzor ne bi bil učinkovit, ker pomanjkljivosti zadevnih storitev ne bi bilo mogoče naknadno preveriti, pri čemer se upoštevajo tveganja in nevarnosti, do katerih lahko pride, ker predhodni nadzor ni bil opravljen.
However, the provision to that effect made by this Directive cannot be relied upon in order to justify authorisation schemes which are prohibited by other Community instruments such as Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures [17], or Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (Directive on electronic commerce) [18].
Vendar se te določbe te direktive ne smejo uporabljati za upravičevanje sistemov dovoljenj, ki jih prepovedujejo drugi instrumenti Skupnosti, kot sta Direktiva 1999/93/ES z dne 13. decembra 1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis [17] ali Direktiva 2000/31/ES z dne 8. junija 2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) [18].
The results of the process of mutual evaluation will make it possible to determine, at Community level, the types of activity for which authorisation schemes should be eliminated.
Na podlagi rezultatov medsebojnega ocenjevanja se bo na ravni Skupnosti lahko določilo, za katere vrste dejavnosti je treba sisteme dovoljenj odpraviti.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to withdraw authorisations after they have been issued, if the conditions for the granting of the authorisation are no longer fulfilled.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da prekličejo izdana dovoljenja, če niso več izpolnjeni pogoji za izdajo dovoljenja.
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, public health, consumer protection, animal health and the protection of the urban environment constitute overriding reasons relating to the public interest.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča so javno zdravje, varstvo potrošnikov, zdravje živali in varstvo urbanega okolja pomembni razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
Such overriding reasons may justify the application of authorisation schemes and other restrictions.
Ti pomembni razlogi lahko upravičujejo uporabo sistemov dovoljenj in drugih omejitev.
However, no such authorisation scheme or restriction should discriminate on grounds of nationality.
Vendar sistemi dovoljenj in omejitve ne bi smeli biti diskriminatorni na podlagi državljanstva.
Further, the principles of necessity and proportionality should always be respected.
Hkrati bi bilo treba vedno spoštovati načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
The provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes should concern cases where the access to or exercise of a service activity by operators requires a decision by a competent authority.
Določbe te direktive v zvezi s sistemi dovoljenj bi morale zadevati primere, v katerih glede začetka opravljanja ali opravljanju dejavnosti s strani gospodarskih subjektov odloči pristojni organ.
This concerns neither decisions by competent authorities to set up a public or private entity for the provision of a particular service nor the conclusion of contracts by competent authorities for the provision of a particular service which is governed by rules on public procurement, since this Directive does not deal with rules on public procurement.
Ker ta direktiva ne zajema predpisov o javnih naročilih, to ne zadeva niti odločitev pristojnih organov o ustanovitvi javnega ali zasebnega subjekta za opravljanje določene storitve niti sklepanja pogodb s strani pristojnih organov o opravljanju določene storitve, ki jo urejajo predpisi o javnih naročilih.
In order to facilitate access to and exercise of service activities, it is important to evaluate and report on authorisation schemes and their justification.
Za lažji začetek opravljanja in opravljanje storitvenih dejavnosti je treba oceniti sisteme dovoljenj in njihovo upravičenost ter poročati o njih.
This reporting obligation concerns only the existence of authorisation schemes and not the criteria and conditions for the granting of an authorisation.
Navedena obveznost poročanja se nanaša samo na obstoj sistemov dovoljenj, ne pa na merila in pogoje za izdajo dovoljenja.