natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission also acknowledges that, when it was approached by UCAR, it had not undertaken investigations, nor had it sufficient information to establish the existence of the infringements.
Komisija tudi priznava, da še ni sprožila preiskav niti ni imela zadostnih informacij za ugotovitev obstoja kartela, ko je podjetje UCAR stopilo z njo v stik.
UCAR had also put an end to its involvement at the time at which it disclosed the cartels and did not compell other enterprises to take part in those cartels.
Podjetje UCAR je tudi prenehalo s svojo vpletenostjo takrat, ko je razkrilo kartele, in ni prisililo drugih podjetij, da bi sodelovali v teh kartelih.
UCAR therefore fulfils, for both infringements, the conditions set out in Section B of the Leniency Notice.
Podjetje UCAR torej pri obeh kršitvah izpolnjuje pogoje, določene v oddelku B Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi.
The Commission accordingly grants UCAR a 100 % reduction of the fine that would otherwise have been imposed on account of the each infringement.
Komisija v skladu s tem podjetju UCAR odobri zmanjšanje globe za 100 %, ki bi mu bila drugače naložena na podlagi vsake kršitve.
Substantial reduction in a fine (Section C: reduction from 50 to 75 %)
Občutno zmanjšanje globe („oddelek C“: zmanjšanje za 50 % do 75 %)
Neither SGL, LCL, Toyo Tanso, Tokai, Ibiden, NSC/NSCC or Intech were the first to provide the Commission with decisive information on the isostatic or extruded specialty cartels, as required under point (a) of Section C of the Leniency Notice.
Niti podjetja SGL, LCL, Toyo Tanso, Tokai, Ibiden, NSC/NSCC ali Intech niso Komisiji prva zagotovila odločilnih informacij o izostatičnem ali ekstrudiranem kartelu, kot je določeno v točki (a) oddelka C Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi.
Consequently none of the above undertakings meet the conditions as set out in this section C.
Posledično nobeno od zgoraj navedenih podjetij ne izpolnjuje pogojev, določenih v oddelku C.
Significant reduction of a fine (Section D: reduction from 10 to 50 %)
Znatno zmanjšanje globe („oddelek D“: zmanjšanje za 10 % do 50 %)
Before the Commission adopted its SO, SGL, LCL, Ibiden, Tokai, Toyo Tanso and NSC/NSCC provided the Commission with information and documents which materially contributed to establishing the existence of the infringements.
Preden je Komisija sprejela svojo izjavo o nasprotovanju, so ji podjetja SGL, LCL, Ibiden, Tokai, Toyo Tanso in NSC/NSCC predložila informacije in dokumente, ki bi znatno prispevali k ugotovitvi obstoja kartela.
None of them substantially contests the facts on which the Commission based its SO.
Nobeno od podjetij ni bistveno izpodbijalo dejstev, s katerimi je Komisija utemeljila svoje obvestilo o nasprotovanju.
The information and documents provided allowed the Commission to confirm and identify the functioning of the cartels and certain elements thereof.
Predloženi dokumenti so Komisiji omogočili potrditi in ugotoviti delovanje ter določene elemente kartelov.
Given that any cooperation under the Leniency Notice must be voluntary and in particular outside the exercise of any investigatory power, the Commission considers that part of the information provided by these undertakings was, in fact, an integral part of their replies to the Commission’s formal requests for information.
Komisija ob dejstvu, da mora biti vsako sodelovanje v okviru Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi prostovoljno in predvsem zunaj katere koli preiskovalne pristojnosti, meni, da je bil del informacij, ki so jih predložila ta podjetja, dejansko sestavni del njihovih odgovorov na uradne zahteve za informacije Komisije.
The information provided by the undertakings is therefore regarded as a voluntary contribution within the meaning of the Leniency Notice only where it went beyond that requested pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation No 17.
Informacije, ki so jih predložila podjetja, se zato štejejo za prostovoljen prispevek v smislu Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi le, kadar presežejo tisto, kar je zahtevano v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe 17.
The Commission concludes that the documents referred to above provided detailed evidence of the organisational structure of the cartel arrangements affecting the two markets and contributed decisively to establishing and/or confirming essential aspects of these infringements.
Komisija ugotavlja, da so se dokumenti nanašali na zgoraj navedene predložene podrobne dokaze o strukturi organizacije kartelnih sporazumov, ki so vplivali na dva trga in odločilno prispevali k ugotovitvi in/ali potrditvi bistvenih vidikov teh kršitev.
Together with UCAR’s statement, these documents constitute the main source of evidence used by the Commission in preparing the present Decision.
Izjava podjetja UCAR in ti dokumenti so glavni vir dokazov, ki jih je uporabila Komisija pri pripravi te odločbe.
Furthermore, the Commission considers that it is not possible to make a distinction as to the value added, that those submissions provided, to the investigation in the isostatic market, since they all took place, with short differences in time, in reaction to the Commission’s formal request for information, and they all provided evidence of similar quality.
Komisija nadalje meni, da glede na dodano vrednost ni mogoče razlikovati med predložitvami k preiskavi na izostatičnem trgu, ker so bile vse kot odziv na uradno zahtevo za informacije Komisije poslane z majhnimi časovnimi razlikami in so vse predložile dokaze podobne kakovosti.
Moreover, none of the submissions was on its own essential for the Commission to keep the substance of its objections in the infringement, since they substantially overlapped each other as to the evidence provided.
Poleg tega za Komisijo nobena od predložitev ni bila sama po sebi bistvena za ohranitev vsebine nasprotovanj v kršitvi, ker se je glede predloženih dokazov njihova vsebina prekrivala.
Intech did not provide any documentary evidence on meetings in its reply to the Commission’s request for information.
Podjetje Intech ni na srečanjih predložilo nobenih dokumentarnih dokazil v svoj odgovor na zahteve za informacije Komisije.
However, it did not substantially contest the facts on which the Commission bases its allegations in the SO.
Vendar ni bistveno izpodbijalo dejstev, na katerih so temeljile obtožbe Komisije v njeni izjavi o nasprotovanju.
SGL, LCL, Ibiden, Tokai, Toyo Tanso and NSC/NSCC therefore fulfil the conditions set out in section D(2), first and second indent, of the Leniency Notice and are granted a 35 % reduction of the fine.
Podjetja SGL, LCL, Ibiden, Tokai, Toyo Tanso in NSC/NSCC zato izpolnjujejo pogoje, določene v prvi in drugi alinei oddelka D(2) Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi, in se jim odobri zmanjšanje globe za 35 %.
Intech fulfils the conditions set out in section D(2), second indent, of the Leniency Notice and is granted a 10 % reduction of fine.
Intech izpolnjuje pogoje, določene v drugi alinei oddelka D(2) Obvestila o ugodni obravnavi, in se mu odobri zmanjšanje globe za 10 %.
Point 5(b) of the Guidelines on fines
Točka 5(b) v smernicah za način določanja glob
According to point 5(b) of the Guidelines on fines, the Commission should take certain objective factors into account, depending on the circumstances of a given case, when fixing fines.
Komisija mora pri določanju glob glede na točko 5(b) smernic za način določanja glob upoštevati določene objektivne dejavnike, ki so odvisni od okoliščin dane zadeve.
Ability to pay
Zmožnost plačila
SGL and NSC have presented arguments relating to their ability to pay.
SGL in NSC sta prikazala razloge v zvezi z njuno zmožnostjo plačila.
In particular, both companies have highlighted […] [3].
Obe podjetji sta še zlasti poudarili […] [3].
In order to consider this argument, the Commission requested detailed information on the companies’ financial positions.
Za obravnavanje tega razloga je Komisija zahtevala podrobne informacije o finančnem položaju podjetij.
After examining the companies’ replies of 20 November 2002, as well as SGL’s further submission made on 8 November 2002, the Commission concludes that it is not appropriate to adjust the amount of the fines in this case.
Po pregledu odgovorov podjetij z dne 20. novembra 2002 ter nadaljnje predložitve SGL dne 8. novembra 2002 Komisija ugotavlja, da prilagoditev zneska glob v tej zadevi ni primerna.
Although the financial data provided by the two undertakings show that both SGL and NSC are […], to take account of the mere fact of the undertakings […], mainly due to general market conditions, would be tantamount to conferring an unjustified competitive advantage on them.
Čeprav finančni podatki, ki sta jih predložili obe podjetji, kažejo, da sta SGL in NSC […], ob upoštevanju samega dejstva podjetij […], predvsem zaradi splošnih tržnih pogojev, bi bilo enakovredno priznavanju nepravične konkurenčne prednosti zanju.
On 18 July 2001 the Commission imposed on SGL a fine of EUR 80,2 million for violation of Article 81 of the Treaty, as a result of the undertaking’s involvement in the graphite electrodes cartel.
Komisija je 18. julija 2001 SGL naložila globo v višini 80,2 milijona EUR za kršitev člena 81 Pogodbe zaradi vpletenosti podjetja v kartel grafitnih elektrod.
It follows that SGL is both in […] and has relatively recently been imposed a significant fine by the Commission.
Iz tega sledi, da je Komisija podjetju SGL tako v […] ter v […] razmeroma pred kratkim naložila precejšnjo globo.
The Commission considers that, in these particular circumstances, imposing the full amount of the fine does not appear necessary in order to ensure effective deterrence.
Komisija meni, da se v teh posebnih okoliščinah nalaganje celotnega zneska globe ne zdi potrebno za zagotovitev učinkovitega odvračanja.
In view of these two factors, the Commission considers that, in this specific case, the fine should be reduced by 33 %.
Glede na ta dva dejavnika Komisija meni, da je treba v tem posebnem primeru globo zmanjšati za 33 %.
DECISION
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV
The following undertakings have infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement by participating, for the periods indicated, in a complex of agreements and concerted practices affecting the Community and EEA markets for isostatic specialty graphite:
Naslednja podjetja so kršila člen 81(1) Pogodbe in člen 53(1) Sporazuma EGP – v navedenih obdobjih – s sodelovanjem v skupini sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj, ki so vplivala na trg Skupnosti in EGP za izostatični posebni grafit:
GrafTech International Ltd, from February 1996 to May 1997;
GrafTech International, Ltd – od februarja 1996 do maja 1997;
SGL Carbon AG, from July 1993 to February 1998;
SGL Carbon AG – od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Le Carbone-Lorraine SA, from July 1993 to February 1998;
Le Carbone-Lorraine S.A. – od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Ibiden Co., Ltd, from July 1993 to February 1998;
Ibiden Co., Ltd. – od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd, from July 1993 to February 1998;
Tokai Carbon Co., Ltd. – od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Toyo Tanso Co. Ltd, from July 1993 to February 1998;
Toyo Tanso Co., Ltd. – od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Nippon Steel Chemical Co. Ltd and NSCC Techno Carbon Co. Ltd, jointly and severally liable, from July 1993 to February 1998;
Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd. in NSCC Techno Carbon Co., Ltd. – solidarno odgovorna od julija 1993 do februarja 1998;
Intech EDM BV and Intech EDM AG, jointly and severally liable, from February 1994 to May 1997.
Intech EDM B.V. in Intech EDM AG – solidarno odgovorna od februarja 1994 do maja 1997.
The following undertakings have infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement by participating, for the periods indicated, in a complex of agreements and concerted practices affecting the Community and EEA markets for extruded specialty graphite:
Naslednja podjetja so kršila člen 81(1) Pogodbe in člen 53(1) Sporazuma EGP – v navedenih obdobjih – s sodelovanjem v skupini sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj, ki so vplivala na trg Skupnosti in EGP za ekstrudirani posebni grafit:
SGL Carbon AG, from February 1993 to November 1996;
SGL Carbon AG – od februarja 1993 do novembra 1996;
GrafTech International, Ltd, from February 1993 to November 1996.
GrafTech International, Ltd. – od februarja 1993 do novembra 1996.
The undertakings listed above shall immediately bring to an end the infringements referred to in that Article, in so far as they have not already done so.
Zgoraj navedena podjetja takoj prenehajo s kršitvami iz navedenega člena, če tega še niso storila.
They shall refrain from repeating any act or conduct referred to above, and from any act or conduct having the same or equivalent object or effect.
Vzdržijo se ponovitve katerega koli zgoraj omenjenega dejanja ali ravnanja ter katerega koli dejanja ali ravnanja, ki ima enak ali enakovreden namen ali učinek.
For the infringements referred to above, the following fines are imposed on the following undertakings:
Za zgoraj navedene kršitve se naslednjim podjetjem naložijo naslednje globe:
GrafTech International, Ltd
GrafTech International, Ltd.:
Isostatic specialty graphite: EUR 0,
izostatični posebni grafit: 0 EUR,
Extruded specialty graphite: EUR 0;
ekstrudirani posebni grafit: 0 EUR;
Isostatic specialty graphite: EUR 18940000,
izostatični posebni grafit: 18940000 EUR,
Extruded specialty graphite: EUR 8810000;
ekstrudirani posebni grafit: 8810000 EUR;
Le Carbone-Lorraine SA: EUR 6970000;
Le Carbone-Lorraine S.A. 6970000 EUR;
Ibiden Co. Ltd: EUR 3580000;
Ibiden Co., Ltd.3580000 EUR;
Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd: EUR 6970000;
Tokai Carbon Co., Ltd. 6970000 EUR;
Toyo Tanso Co. Ltd: EUR 10790000;
Toyo Tanso Co., Ltd. 10790000 EUR;
Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd and NSCC Techno Carbon Co. Ltd, jointly and severally liable: EUR 3580000;
Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd. in NSCC Techno Carbon Co., Ltd. solidarno odgovorna: 3580000 EUR;
Intech EDM BV and Intech EDM AG, jointly and severally liable: EUR 980000.
Intech EDM B.V. in Intech EDM AG solidarno odgovorna: 980000 EUR.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets.
Deli tega besedila so bili urejeni tako, da je zagotovljeno, da se ne razkrije zaupnih informacij; ti deli so v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
SGL Carbon AG,
SGL Carbon AG;
Le Carbone-Lorraine SA,
Le Carbone-Lorraine SA;
All parties submitted written observations in response to the Commission’s SO. Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd and NSCC Techno Carbon Co., Ltd submitted a joint response.
Kot odgovor na izjavo o nasprotovanju Komisije so vse stranke predložile pisna stališča, podjetji Nippon Steel Chemical Co., Ltd. in NSCC Techno Carbon Co., Ltd sta predložili skupni odgovor.
of 26 June 2006
z dne 26. junija 2006
on the allocation to the United Kingdom of additional fishing days within ICES division VIIe
o dodelitvi dodatnih ribolovnih dni Združenemu kraljestvu v razdelku ICES VIIe
(notified under document number C(2006) 2438)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2438)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of stocks, applicable in Community waters and for Community vessels in waters where catch limitations are required [1], and in particular point 9 of Annex IIC,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 51/2006 z dne 22. decembra 2005 o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in s tem povezanih pogojev za nekatere staleže rib in skupine staležev rib, ki se uporabljajo v vodah Skupnosti in za plovila Skupnosti v vodah, kjer so potrebne omejitve ulova za leto 2006 [1], in zlasti točke 9 Priloge IIC,
Point 7 of Annex IIC to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 specifies the maximum number of days (216) on which Community vessels of length overall equal to or greater than 10 meters carrying on board beam trawls of mesh size equal to or greater than 80 mm or static nets with mesh size less than 220 mm may be present within ICES division VIIe from 1 February 2006 to 31 January 2007.
Točka 7 Priloge IIC k Uredbi (ES) št. 51/2006 določa največje število dni (216), ko so plovila Skupnosti skupne dolžine 10 metrov ali več, ki imajo na krovu vlečne mreže z gredjo z velikostjo mrežnega očesa enako ali večjo od 80 mm ali mirujoče mreže z velikostjo mrežnega očesa manj kot 220 mm, lahko prisotna v razdelku ICES VIIe od 1. februarja 2006 do 31. januarja 2007.
Point 9 of that Annex enables the Commission to allocate an additional number of fishing days on which a vessel may be present within that area when carrying on board such beam trawls or static nets, on the basis of permanent cessations of fishing activities that have taken place since 1 of January 2004.
Točka 9 navedene priloge omogoča Komisiji, da dodeli dodatno število ribolovnih dni, ko sme biti plovilo prisotno v območju, če ima na krovu takšne vlečne mreže z gredjo ali mirujoče mreže, na podlagi dokončne prekinitve ribolovnih aktivnosti, ki se izvajajo od 1. januarja 2004.
The United Kingdom has submitted data demonstrating a reduction in 2006 of 5 % in the fleet capacity of vessels present in the area and carrying on board beam trawls of mesh size equal to or greater than 80 mm.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo podatke, ki za leto 2006 kažejo 5 % zmanjšanje zmogljivosti ribiškega ladjevja plovil, ki so prisotna v območju in ki imajo na krovu vlečne mreže z gredjo z velikostjo mrežnega očesa enako ali večjo od 80 mm.
In view of the data submitted, 12 additional days at sea should be allocated to United Kingdom for the period between 1 February 2006 and 31 January 2007 for vessels carrying on board such beam trawls.
Glede na predložene podatke se Združenemu kraljestvu za obdobje med 1. februarjem 2006 in 31. januarjem 2007 za plovila, ki imajo na krovu takšne vlečne mreže z gredjo, dodeli 12 dodatnih dni na morju.
The maximum number of days a fishing vessel flying the flag of the United Kingdom and carrying on board beam trawls of mesh size equal to or greater than 80 mm may be present in ICES division VIIe, as laid down in table I of Annex IIC to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006, shall be amended to 228 days per year.
Največje število dni, ko je lahko ribiško plovilo, ki pluje pod zastavo Združenega kraljestva in ki ima na krovu vlečne mreže z gredjo z velikostjo mrežnega očesa enako ali večjo od 80 mm, prisotno v razdelku ICES VIIe, kot je določeno v tabeli I Priloge IIC k Uredbi (ES) št. 51/2006, se spremeni na 228 dni na leto.
Done at Brussels, 26 June 2006.
V Bruslju, 26. junija 2006
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 898/2006 (OJ L 167, 20.6.2006, p. 16).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 898/2006 (UL L 167, 20.6.2006, str. 16).
amending Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC as regards imports of fresh meat from Botswana
o spremembi Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS glede uvoza svežega mesa iz Bocvane
(notified under document number C(2006) 2880)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2880)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [1], and in particular points (1) and (4) of Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [1], in zlasti točk (1) in (4) člena 8 Direktive,
Part 1 of Annex II to Council Decision 79/542/EEC of 21 December 1976 drawing up a list of third countries or parts of third countries, and laying down animal and public health and veterinary certification conditions, for importation into the Community of certain live animals and their fresh meat [2] sets out a list of third countries and parts of third countries from which Member States are authorised to import fresh meat of animals as defined in that Decision.
Del 1 Priloge II k Odločbi Sveta 79/542/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1976 o seznamu tretjih držav ali delov tretjih držav in o pogojih za zdravstveno varstvo živali in javnozdravstveno varstvo ter izdajanje veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz nekaterih vrst živih živali in njihovega svežega mesa v Skupnost [2] določa seznam tretjih držav in delov tretjih držav, iz katerih lahko države članice uvažajo sveže meso živali, kot je opredeljeno v tej odločbi.
Under that Decision, parts of the territory of Botswana are authorised for imports into the Community of deboned and matured meat from domestic bovine animals, sheep, goats and wild or farmed non-domestic animals other than suidae and solipeds.
V skladu s to odločbo, je iz dela ozemlja Bocvane odobren uvoz izkoščenega in zorjenega mesa domačega goveda, ovac, koz in mesa divjih ali gojenih nedomačih živali, razen prašičev in kopitarjev v Skupnost.
However an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Botswana within the territory of BW-1 was reported by the veterinary authorities of Botswana to the Commission.
Vendar so veterinarski organi Bocvane Komisiji potrdili izbruh slinavke in parkljevke v Bocvani na ozemlju BW-1.
The first clinical signs of that disease were seen by the veterinary authorities on 20 April 2006 and they took immediate and appropriate control measures in the affected zone, including suspending the movement of susceptible animals and their products within and out of the zone and closing down two export establishments approved for imports into the Community.
Prve klinične znake te bolezni so veterinarski organi opazili 20. aprila 2006 in takoj sprejeli ustrezne nadzorne ukrepe v prizadetem območju, vključno s prepovedjo gibanja dovzetnih živali in njihovih proizvodov v in iz tega območja ter zaprtje dveh izvoznih obratov, odobrenih za uvoz v Skupnost.
In order to take into account those measures introduced by Botswana, the list of authorised third countries and parts thereof, as set out out in Part I of Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC, should be amended.
Za upoštevanje ukrepov, ki jih je uvedla Bocvana, je treba spremeniti seznam odobrenih tretjih držav in delov tretjih držav, kot je določen v Delu I Priloge II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS.
Accordingly imports from Botswana into the Community of consignments of deboned and matured meat from domestic animals and farmed game slaughtered or wild game hunted prior to 20 April 2006 originating from the territory of BW-1 should be indicated as authorised.
V skladu s tem je treba uvoz pošiljk iz Bocvane v Skupnost izkoščenega in zorjenega mesa domačih živali in gojene divjadi, zaklane, ali divjadi, ubite pred 20. aprilom s poreklom iz ozemlja BW-1 označiti kot odobren.
However, all consignments of such meat from such animals slaughtered or hunted on or after that date originating from that territory should be indicated as not authorised.
Vendar je treba vse pošiljke takega mesa od živali zaklanih ali ubitih na ta datum, ali po njem, s poreklom iz tega ozemlja označiti kot neodobrene.
Part 1 of Annex II to Decision 79/542/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Del 1 Priloge II k Odločbi 79/542/EGS je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
This Decision is to be reviewed in the light of information obtained from Botswana.
Ta odločba bo ponovno preučena na podlagi podatkov, pridobljenih od Bocvane.
Decision as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/360/EC (OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 34).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2006/360/ES (UL L 134, 20.5.2006, str. 34).
LIST OF THIRD COUNTRIES OR PARTS THEREOF [1]— No certificate laid down and fresh meat imports are prohibited (except for those species where indicated in the line for the whole country).
SEZNAM TRETJIH DRŽAV IN NJIHOVIH DELOV [1]– Spričevalo ni določeno in uvoz svežega mesa je prepovedan (razen za vrste, ki so navedene v vrstici, ki se nanaša na celotno območje države).