natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Certain users also claimed that they would be placed in a situation of competition distortion vis-à-vis producers in the countries concerned of semi-finished and finished products not subject to anti-dumping duties, in particular because such producers would shift their exports to the Community from granular PTFE to semi-finished and finished products.
Nekateri uporabniki so prav tako trdili, da bi bili izpostavljeni izkrivljanju konkurence v primerjavi s proizvajalci iz zadevnih držav, ki proizvajajo polizdelke in končne izdelke, za katere protidampinške dajatve ne veljajo, in sicer zlasti zato, ker bi takšni proizvajalci zamenjali svoj izvoz granuliranega PTFE v Skupnost z izvozom polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov.
As a consequence, users in the Community would need to relocate part of their business outside the European Community in order to have access to cheaper raw material.
Zato bi morali uporabniki v Skupnosti za dostop do cenejših surovin prestaviti del svojega poslovanja izven Evropske skupnosti.
As regards the semi-finished and finished products, it was found that the threat of increasing imports of cheaper semi-finished and finished downstream products from the countries concerned is not imminent.
Glede polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov je bilo ugotovljeno, da nevarnost povečanja uvoza cenejših polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu iz zadevnih držav ni neposredna.
On the basis of the information available, i.e. in particular the known quality difference between the imported granular PTFE from the countries concerned and the one produced by the Community industry, neither Russian nor Chinese producers are currently able to produce the complete product range produced by the users in the Community, due to a lack of the necessary technical know-how.
Glede na dostopne informacije, tj. zlasti na podlagi poznane razlike v kakovosti med uvoženim granuliranim PTFE iz zadevnih držav in tistim, ki ga je proizvedla industrija Skupnosti, ne ruski ne kitajski proizvajalci ne morejo proizvesti celotnega obsega izdelkov, ki jih proizvajajo uporabniki v Skupnosti, saj nimajo potrebnega tehničnega znanja.
A number of parties observed that the know-how of Russian and Chinese producers as well as the quality of their products is constantly increasing and that the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties would accelerate this process because it would create an incentive for shifting the production of semi-finished and finished products to these countries where the granular PTFE was available at cheaper prices.
Številne stranke so pripomnile, da znanje ruskih in kitajskih proizvajalcev ter kakovost njihovih izdelkov stalno naraščata in da bi uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev ta proces pospešila, saj bi spodbudila seljenje proizvodnje polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov v te države, ker je granulirani PTFE cenejši.
It is noted that according to some operators in the market, imports of semi-finished products from the countries concerned indeed appeared to have an increasing trend.
Opomniti je treba, da se je po mnenju nekaterih subjektov na trgu uvoz polizdelkov iz zadevnih držav dejansko večal.
There is, however, no evidence available suggesting that the quality of the products imported is comparable to that of the products manufactured and sold on the Community market and that there would therefore indeed be a higher competition and a risk of increasing imports of semi-finished and finished products.
Vendar ni dokazov, da je kakovost uvoženih izdelkov primerljiva z izdelki, ki so proizvedeni in prodani na trgu Skupnosti, kar bi nato povzročilo večjo konkurenco in nevarnost povečanja uvoza polizdelkov in končnih izdelkov.
Furthermore, the claim that the processing activities would actually consider to move outside the Community, or that exporters would shift into further processed products was not substantiated by sufficient evidence.
Poleg tega trditev, da obstaja možnost selitve proizvodne dejavnosti izven Skupnosti ali verjetnost, da bi izvozniki proizvodnjo preusmerili v nadalje predelane izdelke, ni bila podprta z zadostnimi dokazi.
The investigation also revealed that some users had only recently invested in their production process in the Community, which indicates that the relocation of those production facilities would be highly unlikely.
Preiskava je prav tako razkrila, da so nekateri uporabniki šele nedavno začeli vlagati v svoj proizvodni proces v Skupnosti, zaradi česar bi bila selitev navedenih proizvodnih zmogljivosti zelo malo verjetna.
It was also argued that the processing industry employs by far more people than the granular PTFE producers in the Community and that those jobs would be in danger should anti-dumping measures be imposed.
Prav tako se je trdilo, da predelovalna industrija zaposluje veliko več ljudi kot proizvajalci granuliranega PTFE v Skupnosti in da bi bila v primeru uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov ta delovna mesta ogrožena.
The investigation revealed that the information submitted by the users’/importers’ organisation concerned with regard to employment was largely overestimated.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so bile informacije, ki so jih v zvezi z zaposlovanjem predložile organizacije uporabnikov/uvoznikov, zelo precenjene.
In addition, only a proportion of those jobs would be directly threatened by the imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Poleg tega bi bil zaradi uvedbe protidampinških dajatev neposredno ogrožen le del teh delovnih mest.
It should also be noted that the production of granular PTFE is more capital-intensive, while the production of semi-finished or finished products is much more labour-intensive.
Treba je tudi opomniti, da je proizvodnja granuliranega PTFE bolj kapitalno intenzivna, medtem ko je proizvodnja polizdelkov ali končnih izdelkov veliko bolj delovno intenzivna.
Therefore, a direct comparison between the number of jobs of the granular PTFE industry and the downstream industry is not appropriate.
Zato neposredna primerjava med številom delovnih mest industrije granuliranega PTFE in industrije nadaljnje predelave ni ustrezna.
Furthermore, it should be noted that some jobs at the non-complainant Community producers and suppliers would also be threatened.
Nadalje je treba opomniti, da bi bila ogrožena tudi nekatera delovna mesta proizvajalcev in dobaviteljev Skupnosti, ki niso pritožniki.
As indicated above, the non-complainant Community producers have already lost significant market share since the beginning of the period considered.
Kakor je navedeno zgoraj, so proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki niso pritožniki, od začetka obravnavanega obdobja že izgubili pomemben tržni delež.
Finally, a number of users and therefore jobs in the Community are also dependent fully or partly on the supply from the Community industry and from the non-complainant Community producers.
Nazadnje so številni uporabniki in s tem delovna mesta v Skupnosti v celoti ali delno odvisni tudi od ponudbe industrije Skupnosti in od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, ki niso pritožniki.
Therefore, should the Community industry disappear these jobs would be equally in danger.
Zato bi bila ogrožena tudi ta delovna mesta, če bi industrija Skupnosti izginila.
Shortage of supply
Pomanjkanje ponudbe
A number of parties also reiterated that the imposition of definitive duties would lead to a shortage of supply because it would prevent the exporting producers from the PRC and Russia from exporting their products to the Community, while the Community industry would not have sufficient capacity to supply the Community demand.
Številne stranke so tudi ponovno poudarile, da bi uvedba dokončnih dajatev povzročila pomanjkanje ponudbe, saj bi proizvajalcem izvoznikom iz LRK in Rusije preprečila izvoz njihovih izdelkov v Skupnost, industrija Skupnosti pa ne bi imela dovolj zmogljivosti, da bi zadostila povpraševanju.
It was also argued that even if the Community industry would have the theoretical capacity to increase its production of PTFE, this would economically not be interesting since the production of granular PTFE would generate less profit than the production of other fluoropolymers.
Prav tako so trdile, da tudi če bi industrija Skupnosti teoretično lahko povečala svojo proizvodnjo PTFE, to ne bi bilo gospodarsko zanimivo, saj bi bila proizvodnja granuliranega PTFE manj dobičkonosna kot proizvodnja drugih fluoropolimerov.
It was claimed that other sources, such as Japan and the USA would not be a valid alternative because import prices from these countries remain high.
Trdile so, da drugi viri, kot so Japonska in ZDA, ne bi bili primerna druga možnost, saj uvozne cene iz teh držav ostajajo visoke.
It was further claimed that the shortage in the Community market would be aggravated by the expected increase in demand on the Community market.
Nadalje so trdile, da bi se pomanjkanje na trgu Skupnosti še zaostrilo zaradi pričakovanega povečanja povpraševanja na trgu Skupnosti.
On the other hand, for certain low-end applications, the product produced in the Community would be over-specified and would be too expensive to be used in such applications.
Po drugi strani bi bil izdelek, proizveden v Skupnosti, za nekatera nizko kakovostna področja uporabe preveč specializiran in predrag za uporabo.
Finally, it was argued that reactor bead would not be sold at all in the Community, while pre-sintered grades are only produced in limited quantities in the Community, thus users would be dependent on imports from the countries under consideration.
Nazadnje so trdile, da se reakcijska kapljica v industriji Skupnosti sploh ne bi prodajala in bi bile predhodno sintrane vrste v Skupnosti proizvedene samo v omejenih količinah, zato bi bili uporabniki odvisni od uvoza iz obravnavanih držav.
It should be recalled that the Community industry’s capacity is 9200 tons, at 80 % capacity utilisation.
Opozoriti je treba, da je zmogljivost industrije Skupnosti 9200 ton pri 80 % izkoriščeni zmogljivosti.
The sales volume during the IP was about 4845 tons.
Obseg prodaje v OP je bil približno 4845 ton.
This implies that the complaining producers would be able to sell an additional 4355 tons of the like product, which is 85 % of the total imports of the countries concerned.
To pomeni, da bi proizvajalci pritožniki lahko prodali dodatnih 4355 ton podobnega izdelka, kar je 85 % celotnega uvoza zadevnih držav.
The argument that the Community industry would not use this free capacity to produce granular PTFE, due to the low profit margins generated by the sales of this product, had to be rejected.
Utemeljitev, da industrija Skupnosti za proizvodnjo granuliranega PTFE ne bi uporabila teh svojih prostih zmogljivosti zaradi nizkih stopenj dobička pri prodaji tega izdelka, je bilo treba zavrniti.
It should be noted that this argument was not supported by any evidence.
Opomniti je treba, da ta utemeljitev ni bila podprta z nobenim dokazom.
Moreover, the low profitability generated by the Community industry’s sales of granular PTFE was due to the dumped imports which were significantly undercutting the Community industry’s prices and therefore causing substantial price pressure.
Poleg tega je bil vzrok nizke dobičkonosnosti prodaje industrije Skupnosti granuliranega PTFE dampinški uvoz, ki je občutno in nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti in tako povzročil velik cenovni pritisk.
Therefore, with the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties prices on the Community market should recover which would also have a positive effect on the profitability.
Zato bi uvedba dokončnih protidampinških dajatev povzročila zvišanje cen na trgu Skupnosti, kar bi imelo tudi pozitiven učinek na dobičkonosnost.
As far as reactor bead is concerned, it was found that only very limited quantities were imported during the IP.
Glede reaktorske kapljice je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v OP uvožene samo zelo majhne količine.
Likewise, imports of pre-sintered grades were very limited during the IP, which implies that pre-sintered grades are made by the users themselves.
Prav tako je bil v OP zelo nizek uvoz predhodno sintranih vrst, kar pomeni, da jih izdelujejo uporabniki sami.
It was found that at least two Community producers are able to produce pre-sintered grades.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da lahko predhodno sintrane vrste proizvajata vsaj dva proizvajalca Skupnosti.
Finally, as mentioned above, the Community industry also sold ‘off-spec’ grades during the IP, which are comparable to the low quality grades from the PRC and Russia.
Nazadnje je, kot je navedeno zgoraj, industrija Skupnosti v OP prav tako prodajala „neustrezne“ vrste, ki so primerljive z nizko kakovostnimi vrstami iz LRK in Rusije.
Other sources, such as Japan and USA are also available.
Na voljo so tudi drugi viri, kot sta Japonska in ZDA.
The argument that import prices from these countries are higher than those from the countries under investigation and that granular PTFE from Japan and the USA would therefore not be a valid alternative cannot be accepted because the purpose of the anti-dumping duties is precisely to eliminate injurious dumping and restore fair conditions of competition.
Utemeljitev, da so uvozne cene iz teh držav višje kot tiste iz držav v preiskavi in da granulirani PTFE iz Japonske in ZDA zato ne bi bil primerna druga možnost, ne more biti sprejeta, saj je namen protidampinških dajatev prav odprava škodljivega dampinga in vzpostavitev poštenih konkurenčnih pogojev.
It is further recalled that the purpose of any anti-dumping measure is by no means to stop access to the Community market for products from the countries concerned, but rather to restore a level playing field that had been distorted by unfair trade practices.
Nadalje je treba opozoriti, da namen protidampinških ukrepov ni preprečiti dostop izdelkom iz zadevnih držav na trg Skupnosti, ampak ponovno vzpostaviti raven enakih pogojev delovanja, ki so jih izkrivile nepoštene trgovinske prakse.
Therefore, granular PTFE, including the product types for which a shortage was alleged, from the countries concerned can continue to enter the Community market, albeit at higher price levels.
Zato se lahko nadaljuje uvoz granuliranega PTFE vključno z vrstami izdelka, ki jih je domnevno primanjkovalo, na trg Skupnosti, vendar po višjih cenah.
Based on the abovementioned considerations and other elements contained in recitals 139 to 153 of the provisional Regulation, it is concluded that no compelling reasons exist for not imposing anti-dumping measures on import of the product concerned originating in Russia and the PRC.
Na podlagi zgornjih premislekov in drugih elementov iz uvodnih izjav (139) do (153) začasne uredbe, se sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Rusije in LRK.
Based on the methodology set out in recitals 154 to 159 of the provisional Regulation, an injury elimination level was calculated for the purpose of establishing the level of measures to be definitively imposed.
Na podlagi metodologije, določene v uvodnih izjavah (154) do (159) začasne uredbe, je bila izračunana stopnja odprave škode za določitev stopnje ukrepov, ki naj se uvedejo.
One of the Russian exporting producers claimed that the adjustment for differences in the level of trade should have been based on the information provided by the fully cooperating unrelated importer which accounted for the major part of its imports.
Eden od ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov je trdil, da bi morala biti prilagoditev za razlike v stopnji trgovine utemeljena z informacijami, ki jih je predložil v celoti sodelujoči nepovezani uvoznik, ki je prevzel večji del njegovega uvoza v Skupnost.
However, although the information of this importer was verified on-the-spot, due to the highly complex sales structure of the importer in question, involving a number of different companies from which no information was available, purchase prices and consequently the profit margin of this unrelated importer could not be reliably established and were therefore not used.
Vendar kljub temu, da so bile informacije tega uvoznika preverjene na kraju samem, nakupnih cen in posledično stopnje dobička tega nepovezanega uvoznika ni bilo mogoče ustrezno oceniti in uporabiti zaradi zelo zapletene prodajne strukture zadevnega uvoznika s številnimi različnimi družbami, za katere informacije niso bile na voljo.
Alternatively, this exporting producer claimed that in order to calculate the adjustment for the level of trade, the cif import price should be compared to the resale price of the importer in question in the Community.
V okviru druge možnosti je ta proizvajalec trdil, da je treba za izračun prilagoditve v stopnji trgovine primerjati CIF uvozno ceno z maloprodajno ceno zadevnega uvoznika v Skupnosti.
However, it was found that this methodology would not lead to more reliable results than the methodology used for the provisional determinations.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da ta metodologija ne bi vodila do zanesljivejših rezultatov kot metodologija, uporabljena za začasne določitve.
In contrast, the information available, in particular the audited accounts of the importer, confirmed that the estimations made in the provisional determinations were reasonable.
Nasprotno so razpoložljive informacije, zlasti računovodska evidenca uvoznika, potrdile, da so ocene iz začasnih določitev sprejemljive.
Both Russian exporting producers also claimed that the comparison of their export price to the non-injurious price should have been made on a per-model basis.
Oba ruska proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila tudi, da bi bilo treba njuno izvozno ceno primerjati z neškodljivo ceno na podlagi primerjave posameznih vrst.
In particular, it was argued that the more expensive speciality types produced by the Community industry should have been excluded from the calculation of the injury elimination level.
Zlasti sta trdila, da bi bilo treba dražje, posebne vrste, ki jih je proizvedla industrija Skupnosti, izključiti iz izračuna stopnje odprave škode.
In this context, it is recalled that, as outlined in recitals 28 to 40 of this Regulation, findings for both Russian exporting producers had to be based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V tem okviru je treba opozoriti, da je bilo treba ugotovitve obeh ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov utemeljiti na dejstvih, razpoložljivih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (28) do (40) te uredbe.
Since no reliable data on a per-model basis was available, the determination of the export price of these exporting producers was based on data recorded by Eurostat.
Ker niso bili na voljo nobeni zanesljivi podatki, ki bi temeljili na primerjavi posameznih vrst, je določitev izvozne cene teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov temeljila na podatkih Eurostata.
Furthermore, as mentioned in recital 9 and 55 of this Regulation, imported PTFE after post-treatment was of a similar quality to the PTFE produced by the Community industry and could be used in almost all applications, including high-end applications.
Poleg tega je bil PTFE, uvožen po obdelavi, podobne kakovosti kot PTFE, ki ga je proizvedla industrija Skupnosti, in se je lahko uporabljal na skoraj vseh področjih uporabe, vključno z nekaterimi vrhunskimi, kakor je omenjeno v uvodnih izjavah (9) in (55) te uredbe.
This claim had therefore to be rejected.
Ta zahtevek je bilo zato treba zavrniti.
A number of parties contested the level of profit of 9,3 % used for the calculation of the provisional underselling margin, claiming that it was too high.
Številne stranke so izpodbijale stopnjo dobička 9,3 %, uporabljeno za izračun začasne stopnje prodaje po prenizkih cenah, in trdile, da je previsoka.
In particular, it was argued that it should be taken into consideration that the granular PTFE market is shrinking and cost of production is increasing, therefore the Community industry would not have been able to achieve 9,3 % profit in the absence of dumped imports.
Zlasti so trdile, da bi se moralo upoštevati krčenje trga z granuliranim PTFE in naraščanje stroškov proizvodnje, zaradi česar naj industrija Skupnosti ne bi dosegla stopnje dobička 9,3 %, če ne bi bilo dampinškega uvoza.
It was proposed to use a profit margin of 5 % instead.
Namesto tega so predlagale 5 % stopnjo dobička.
In this regard, it is recalled that the profit margin of 9,3 % was based on actual and verified data submitted by the Community producers, i.e. evidence which showed that 9,3 % was the profit effectively obtained before dumped imports started to penetrate into the Community market.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je 9,3 % stopnja dobička temeljila na dejanskih in preverjenih podatkih, ki so jih predložili proizvajalci Skupnosti, tj. na dokazih, da so imeli 9,3 % stopnjo dobička preden je dampinški uvoz prodrl na trg Skupnosti.
It is also noted that, as mentioned in recital 112 of this Regulation cost of production decreased during the period considered.
Prav tako je treba omeniti, da so se stroški proizvodnje v obravnavanem obdobju zmanjšali, kakor je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (112) te uredbe.
In the absence of any new information, the methodology used for establishing the injury margin as described in recitals 156 to 159 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni na voljo nobenih novih informacij, se potrdi metodologija, uporabljena za določitev stopnje škode, kakor je opisana v uvodnih izjavah (156) do (159) začasne uredbe.
Definitive duties
Dokončne dajatve
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found, but should not be higher than the injury margin calculated in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi prej omenjenega velja, da je treba na podlagi ugotovljene stopnje dampinga uvesti stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki ne sme presegati stopnje škode, izračunane v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe.
The proposed definitive duty rates, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community border price, customs duty unpaid, are as follows:
Predlagane dokončne stopnje dajatev, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane carine, so naslednje:
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporter, but also to those companies which did not have any exports during the IP.
Za zagotavljanje ustreznega uveljavljanja protidampinške dajatve bi morala stopnja preostale dajatve veljati ne le za nesodelujoče izvoznike, ampak tudi za družbe, ki niso izvažale v OP.
However, the latter companies are invited, when they fulfil the requirements of Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, second paragraph, to present a request for a review pursuant to that Article in order to have their situation examined individually.
Slednje so vabljene, da potem, ko izpolnijo zahteve iz drugega odstavka člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe, predložijo zahtevek za pregled v skladu z navedenim členom, da bi bilo njihovo stanje proučeno individualno.
One Chinese exporting producer which was granted neither MET nor IT has shown an interest in offering an undertaking.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu nista bila odobrena ne TGO ne IO, je izrazil interes, da bi ponudil zavezo.
However, it is Commission practice not to accept undertaking offers from companies which were neither granted MET nor IT since no individual dumping margin can be established in those cases.
Vendar je ustaljena praksa Komisije, da ne sprejema ponudb zavez družb, katerim nista bila odobrena ne TGO ne IO, saj se v teh primerih ne more določiti individualne stopnje dampinga.
Moreover, the investigation revealed that the accounts of the company concerned were not reliable so that the monitoring of the undertaking would have proved impractical.
Poleg tega je preiskava razkrila, da računovodski izkazi zadevne družbe niso bili zanesljivi, tako da bi bilo spremljanje zaveze nesmiselno.
The two Russian exporting producers also made proposals for offering an undertaking.
Tudi dva ruska proizvajalca izvoznika sta ponudila zaveze.