natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Prices for imports from the former accession countries Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia were, inclusive of anti-dumping duties, also at a significantly higher level than those from Croatia and Ukraine, but still lower than the Community industry's prices.
Cene uvoza iz bivših držav pristopnic, Poljske, Češke in Slovaške, so bile prav tako na precej višjem nivoju kot hrvaške ali ukrajinske, vendar še vedno nižje od cen industrije Skupnosti.
Their market share altogether in the IP was 14,2 %.
Njihov skupni tržni delež v OP je znašal 14,2 %.
Although those imports could also have contributed to the injury, it can be concluded from their price level that their contribution could have been only a minor one.
Čeprav bi ta uvoz prav tako lahko prispeval k škodi, pa se lahko na podlagi stopnje cen zaključi, da je bil njihov prispevek zanemarljiv.
Having regard to the fact that imports from Croatia and Ukraine undercut substantially the Community industry prices, there is no indication that the abovementioned imports, which in the majority undercut the Community prices to a lesser extent, could break the causal link between the dumped imports from Croatia and Ukraine and the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je uvoz iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine industriji Skupnosti bistveno znižal cene, ni nobenih pokazateljev, da bi zgoraj navedeni uvoz, ki je večinoma v manjši meri nižal cene industriji Skupnosti, lahko prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Imports from several other third countries altogether accounted for 8,9 % market share in the IP.
Uvoz iz nekaterih drugih tretjih držav je v OP skupaj obsegal tržni delež 8,9 %.
With regard to their high level of prices which are in the majority sufficiently above the Community industry prices, there is no indication that those imports could break the causal link between the dumped imports from Croatia and Ukraine and the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Ob upoštevanju njihovih visokih stopenj cen, ki so večinoma dovolj višje od cen industrije Skupnosti, ni nobenih pokazateljev, da bi ta uvoz lahko prekinil vzročno zvezo med dampinškim uvozom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
Other Community producers, which did not cooperate in the investigation were facing the same problems as regards the increasing raw material costs forcing them to raise prices as much as possible.
Drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki v preiskavi niso sodelovali, so se soočali z istimi problemi, kar zadeva rastoče stroške surovin, kar jih je prisililo v zvišanje cen, kolikor je bilo to mogoče.
No indication has been found that those competitors could have caused the injury suffered by the Community industry.
Ugotovljen ni bil noben pokazatelj, da bi ti konkurenti lahko povzročili škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
There is a decreasing consumption in the Community as from 2001 on.
V Skupnosti od leta 2001 naprej poraba upada.
However, Community sales decreased to a higher percentage than the consumption and Community industry lost market share while the countries concerned increased their market share on the Community market in that period.
Vendar pa je prodaja Skupnosti upadla za večji odstotek kot poraba in industrija Skupnosti je izgubila tržni delež, medtem ko so zadevne države v tem obdobju svoj tržni delež na trgu Skupnosti povečale.
Therefore, it is concluded that this factor could not break the causal link between the dumped imports from Croatia and Ukraine and the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato se zaključi, da ta dejavnik ni mogel prekiniti vzročne zveze med dampinškim uvozom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine in znatno škodo, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
No other factors have been found in the course of the investigation that could have caused injury.
Med preiskavo niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni drugi dejavniki, ki bi lahko povzročili škodo.
Based on the above analysis of the effects of all known factors on the situation of the Community industry, it is concluded that the causal link between the dumped imports from Croatia and Ukraine and the material injury to the Community industry, which has been established in the previous investigation, has not been broken.
Na podlagi zgornje analize učinkov vseh znanih dejavnikov na stanje industrije Skupnosti se zaključi, da vzročna zveza med dampinškim uvozom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine in znatno škodo industrije Skupnosti, ki je bila ugotovljena v prejšnji preiskavi, ni bila pretrgana.
General considerations
Splošne pripombe
It has been examined whether compelling reasons exist that could lead to the conclusion that it would not be in the Community interest to maintain the anti-dumping duties against imports from the countries concerned.
Preverjeno je bilo, ali obstajajo tehtni razlogi, ki bi vodili k zaključku, da ohranitev veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov proti uvozu iz zadevnih držav ni v interesu Skupnosti.
The Commission sent questionnaires to importers and industrial users.
Komisija je uvoznikom in industrijskim uporabnikom poslala vprašalnike.
A complete questionnaire reply was received from one importer, Comercial de Tubos, SA, Spain.
Prejela je izpolnjen vprašalnik od enega uvoznika, Comercial de Tubos, S.A., Španija.
From the user industry, no questionnaire replies were received.
Od uporabniške industrije ni prejela nobenega odgovora.
No supplier has made itself known during the investigation.
Med preiskavo se ni priglasil noben dobavitelj.
On the basis of the information received from the cooperating parties, the following conclusions are reached.
Na podlagi informacij, prejetih od sodelujočih strani, so bili doseženi naslednji zaključki.
It should be recalled that, in the previous investigation, the adoption of measures was considered not to be against the interest of the Community.
Treba je opozoriti, da se za sprejetje ukrepov v prejšnji preiskavi ni štelo, da nasprotuje interesu Skupnosti.
Furthermore, the fact that the present investigation is a review, thus analysing a situation in which anti-dumping measures have already been in place, allows the assessment of any undue negative impact on the parties concerned by the current anti-dumping measures.
Poleg tega samo dejstvo, da je pričujoča preiskava pregled, ki analizira stanje, v katerem so bili protidampinški ukrepi že uvedeni, dovoljuje oceno kakršnih koli nepravilnih negativnih učinkov na zadevne stranke zaradi veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
It is recalled that the Community industry consisted of five producers which employ approximately 2470 staff for the production and sales of seamless pipes and tubes.
Kakor je bilo ugotovljeno, industrijo Skupnosti sestavlja pet proizvajalcev, ki so zaposlovali približno 2470 zaposlenih v proizvodnji in prodaji brezšivnih cevi.
It is also recalled that the economic indicators of the Community industry above showed deteriorating financial results during the investigation period.
Prav tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zgoraj navedeni gospodarski pokazatelji industrije Skupnosti v preiskovalnem obdobju kazali poslabšanje finančnih rezultatov.
Despite the growing consumption of seamless pipes and tubes in the Community in 2000 and 2001, which was, however, again declining in the IP, the Community industry could not gain financial stability.
Kljub rastoči porabi brezšivnih cevi v Skupnosti v letih 2000 in 2001, ki pa je ponovno upadla v OP, industrija Skupnosti ni mogla doseči finančne stabilnosti.
Indeed, the industry recovered partially in 2000 to 2001.
Industrija si je delno opomogla v letih 2000 do 2001.
However, given the prevailing financial situation for the Community industry, it is clear that anti-dumping measures would be in the interest of the Community industry.
Vendar pa je glede na prevladujoče finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti jasno, da bi bili protidampinški ukrepi v interesu industrije Skupnosti.
Interest of unrelated importers
Interesi nepovezanih uvoznikov
The cooperating importer did not generally oppose the continued imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Sodelujoči uvoznik na splošno ni nasprotoval nadaljnji uveljavitvi protidampinških ukrepov.
No other comments from importers, which imported the product concerned from Croatia or Ukraine, were received.
Od uvoznikov, ki uvažajo zadevni izdelek iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine, niso bile prejete nobene druge pripombe.
The purpose of the anti-dumping measures is to restore fair trade.
Namen protidampinških ukrepov je ponovno vzpostaviti lojalno trgovino.
It is neither to prohibit imports nor to hamper the activities of the importers in the Community.
Namen ni niti prepovedati uvoza niti ovirati dejavnosti uvoznikov v ES.
In fact, any measures to be proposed are to be set at a level which will enable the continuation of imports also in future, but at prices that are non-dumped or non-injurious, whichever is the lower.
Dejansko morajo biti vsi predlagani ukrepi določeni na taki ravni, ki bo dovoljevala nadaljevanje uvoza tudi v prihodnosti, vendar po cenah, ki ne bodo dampinške ali škodljive, kar koli bo nižje.
As fairly-priced imports will still be allowed to enter into the Community market, it is likely that the traditional business of the importers will continue even if anti-dumping measures against dumped imports are imposed.
Ker bo uvoz po lojalnih cenah še vedno dovoljen na trgu Skupnosti, je zelo verjetno, da se bo tradicionalno poslovanje uvoznikov nadaljevalo, čeprav bodo uveljavljeni protidampinški ukrepi proti dampinškemu uvozu.
Interest of suppliers
Interes dobaviteljev
No supplier made himself known during the investigation.
Med preiskavo se ni priglasil noben dobavitelj.
Therefore, it is concluded that no compelling reason exists that measures should not be imposed as regards the suppliers' interests.
Zato se zaključi, da ne obstajajo tehtni razlogi na strani interesov dobaviteljev, da se ukrepi ne bi uveljavili.
In the previous investigation, it was concluded that any price effect resulting from anti-dumping measures would not be significant with respect to downstream industrial users.
V prejšnji preiskavi je bilo zaključeno, da morebitni cenovni učinek iz protidampinških ukrepov za industrijske uporabnike ne bo bistven.
This was based on the fact that seamless pipes and tubes represented only a small element in the overall costs of the user industries (including the chemical and petrochemical industries, power stations, the automobile and construction industries).
Ta ugotovitev je temeljila na dejstvu, da brezšivne cevi predstavljajo samo majhen delež v skupnih stroških uporabniških industrij (vključno s kemično in petrokemično industrijo, elektrarnami, avtomobilsko in gradbeno industrijo).
Given that no representations have been made contradicting the previous findings and in view of the lack of cooperation of users in the present investigation, it is expected that any price effect resulting from anti-dumping measures would be negligible with respect to downstream industrial users.
Glede na to, da ni bil predložen noben ugovor, ki bi spodbijal prejšnje ugotovitve, ter glede na pomanjkanje sodelovanja uporabnikov v trenutni preiskavi, se pričakuje, da bo morebitni cenovni učinek, ki izhaja iz protidampinških ukrepov, za industrijske uporabnike zanemarljiv.
Competition aspects
Vidiki konkurence
It should be noted that in Commission Decision 2003/382/EC [9], it was found that some Community producers were involved in an anti-competitive agreement on parts of the product concerned until 1995.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bilo z Odločbo Komisije 2003/382/ES [9] ugotovljeno, da so bili nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti do leta 1995 udeleženi v protikonkurenčni sporazum glede delov zadevnega izdelka.
Accordingly, neither the original investigation with an IP from 1 November 1997 until 31 October 1998 (and with a period considered from January 1997 until the end of the IP), nor the current review investigation were affected by any anti-competitive practices.
V skladu s tem ni protikonkurenčno ravnanje vplivalo niti na prvotno preiskavo z OP od 1. novembra 1997 do 31. oktobra 1998 (in z obravnavanim obdobjem od 1. januarja 1997 do konca OP) niti na trenutno preiskavo za pregled.
The maintenance of measures against imports of seamless pipes and tubes originating in the countries concerned would clearly be in the interest of the Community industry.
Ohranitev ukrepov proti uvozu brezšivnih cevi s poreklom iz zadevnih držav bi bila jasno v interesu industrije Skupnosti.
As regards both the importers/traders and the user industries, any impact on prices of seamless tubes is expected only to be marginal.
Glede uvoznikov/trgovcev in uporabniških industrij se pričakuje, da bo kakršen koli vpliv na cene brezšivnih cevi samo marginalen.
In view of the above, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping duties against imports of seamless pipes and tubes originating in the countries concerned.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se zaključi, da ni tehtnih razlogov, da se ne bi uvedli protidampinški ukrepi proti uvozu brezšivnih cevi s poreklom iz zadevnih držav.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury and Community interest, measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na zaključke, sprejete v zvezi z dampingom, škodo in interesom Skupnosti, bi bilo treba uveljaviti ukrepe za preprečevanje povzročanja nadaljnje škode industriji Skupnosti zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
The measures should be imposed at a level sufficient to eliminate the injury caused by these imports without exceeding the dumping margin found.
Ukrepi morajo biti uvedeni na ravni, ki bo zadoščala za odpravo škode, ki jo je povzročil ta uvoz, brez preseganja ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and to obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on the sales of the like product in the Community.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bilo upoštevano, da morajo ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočiti, da pokrije stroške proizvodnje in pridobi dobiček pred odbitkom davka, ki bi ga razumno lahko dosegla industrija istega tipa pri prodaji podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti, pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 5 % of turnover.
Stopnja dobička pred odbitkom davka, ki se je uporabila za ta izračun, je bila 5 % prometa.
It is the same as in the original proceeding since there was no indication found and no intervention made that this rate should be changed.
Ta je enaka, kot je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi, saj niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni razlogi, in tudi nihče ni posredoval za spremembo te stopnje.
On this basis, a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product.
Na tej osnovi je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za industrijo Skupnosti podobnega izdelka.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adding the abovementioned profit margin of 5 % to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila izračunana s prištetjem zgoraj navedene 5 % stopnje dobička stroškom proizvodnje.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price.
Potrebno zvišanje cene je bilo potem določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, kot je bila določena za izračune nelojalnega nižanja cen s povprečno neškodljivo ceno.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Morebitna razlika med tema dvema je bila izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne CIF vrednosti.
Amended measures
Spremenjeni ukrepi
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that the anti-dumping duties in force against imports of the product concerned originating in Croatia and Ukraine should be amended.
Glede na prej omenjeno je bilo ugotovljeno, da se morajo veljavne protidampinške dajatve proti uvozu zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine spremeniti.
The new anti-dumping duties should be set at a level reflecting the injury margins found, as the dumping margins found for all companies in Croatia and Ukraine were higher than the injury margins calculated.
Nove protidampinške dajatve se morajo določiti na ravni, ki odraža ugotovljene stopnje škode, saj so bile ugotovljene dampinške stopnje za vsa podjetja na Hrvaškem in v Ukrajini višje od izračunanih stopenj škode.
Since the level of cooperation was high (more than 80 % of the exports of the product concerned from Ukraine to the Community), the residual margin for Ukraine should be set at the same level as that established for the cooperating exporting producers OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP) and CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant ‘Nikotube’.
Ker je bila raven sodelovanja visoka (več kot 80 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Ukrajine v Skupnost), se preostala stopnja za Ukrajino določi na isti ravni kot za sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP) in CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant „Nikotube“.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Individualne protidampinške stopnje dajatev za podjetja, določene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na osnovi izsledkov te preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo stanje, ugotovljeno med to preiskavo za ta podjetja.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celo državo, ki se uporablja za „vsa druga podjetja“) se zato uporabljajo izključno samo za uvoz s poreklom iz zadevnih držav ter proizvode, ki jih proizvajajo navedena podjetja in tako specifične pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja katero koli drugo podjetje, ki ni posebej navedeno v operativnem delu te uredbe, z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti, in za njih velja dajatev, ki se uporablja za „vsa druga podjetja“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [10] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with e.g. that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Zahteva za uporabo teh individualnih protidampinških stopenj dajatev za podjetja (npr. po spremembi imena subjekta ali po vzpostavitvi nove proizvodnje ali prodajnih subjektov) mora biti nemudoma naslovljena na Komisijo [10], z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti morebitnimi spremembami dejavnosti podjetja, povezane s proizvodnjo, domače prodaje in prodaje v izvoz, povezane z npr. to spremembo imena ali to spremembo v proizvodnji, ali prodajnih subjektih.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Po potrebi bo uredba ustrezno spremenjena z osvežitvijo seznama podjetij, ki koristijo individualne stopnje dajatev.
The proposed anti-dumping duties are the following:
Predlagane protidampinške dajatve so sledeče:
OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP), Dnipropetrovsk and CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant ‘Nikotube’, Nikopol
OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP), Dnipropetrovsk, in CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant „Nikotube“, Nikopol
On the basis of the measures proposed, a new five-year period for the measures will start to run.
Na podlagi predlaganih ukrepov se prične novo petletno obdobje ukrepov.
The measures, therefore, will not expire on 18 February 2005 as stated in the notice of impending expiry published on 27 August 2004 [11].
Tako ukrepi ne bodo prenehali veljati 18. februarja 2005, kakor je navedeno v obvestilu o bližajočem izteku, objavljenem dne 27. avgusta 2004 [11].
Developments after the IP concerning the Croatian exporter
Razvoj po OP v zvezi s hrvaškim izvoznikom
Subsequent to the disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was concluded that the level of the anti-dumping measures should be amended, the Croatian government informed the Commission that the sole producer in Croatia, Mechel Željezara Ltd, has been liquidated and ceased production in autumn 2004.
Po razkritju osnovnih dejstev in dejavnikov, na podlagi katerih je bilo zaključeno, da se mora stopnja protidampinških ukrepov spremeniti, je hrvaška vlada obvestila Komisijo, da je šel edini proizvajalec na Hrvaškem, Mechel Željezara Ltd., v likvidacijo, in da je prenehal s proizvodnjo jeseni 2004.
In its place, a new legal entity named Valjaonice Cijevi Sisak d.o.o (Valjaonice) was set up by the Croatian Privatisation Foundation (CPF), a governmental institution in charge of the privatisation process in Croatia.
Namesto njega je Hrvaška privatizacijska fundacija (HPF), vladna institucija, pristojna za postopek privatizacije na Hrvaškem, ustanovila novo pravno osebo z imenom Valjaonice Cijevi Sisak d.o.o („Valjaonice“).
The newly established company appears not to have started production yet and is in the process of obtaining the assets from Mechel Željezara Ltd.
Novo ustanovljeno podjetje očitno še ni začelo s proizvodnjo in je v postopku pridobivanja sredstev od Mechel Željezara Ltd.
However, from the information submitted it appears that the production capacity of Valjaonice will remain unchanged compared to that of Mechel Željezara Ltd and that there is a clear intention by Valjaonice to continue the production of the product concerned.
Vendar pa iz predloženih informacij izhaja, da bo proizvodna zmogljivost Valjaonice ostala nespremenjena v primerjavi s proizvodno zmogljivostjo Mechel Željezara Ltd., ter da ima Valjaonice jasen interes nadaljevati s proizvodnjo zadevnega izdelka.
On this basis, the fact that the production has stopped cannot be considered as of a lasting and undisputed nature and does not, therefore, affect the findings of the investigation.
Na tej podlagi dejstva, da je proizvodnja prenehala, ni mogoče šteti kot trajnega in nespremenljivega, zaradi česar ne vpliva na izsledke te preiskave.
However, should there be changes in the situation of the company justifying a review of the measures, such a review will be initiated.
V primeru, da bi prišlo do sprememb v stanju podjetja, ki bi opravičevale pregled teh ukrepov, bo tak pregled sprožen.
Undertakings
Zaveze
The Commission, by Decision 2000/137/EC, accepted a price undertaking, inter alia, from the sole Croatian exporting producer.
Komisija je z Odločbo 2000/137/ES sprejela cenovno zavezo od edinega hrvaškega proizvajalca.
This undertaking with regard to Mechel Željezara Ltd was also subject to the review.
Ta zaveza Mechel Željezare Ltd. je bila prav tako predmet pregleda.