natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These deficiencies have been initially identified by the Netherlands, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [13].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [13], ugotovila Nizozemska.
Persistent failure by Reem Air to address deficiencies was confirmed by the Netherlands, during subsequent ramp inspections on one specific aircraft performed under the SAFA programme [14].
Med naslednjimi preverjanji na ploščadi na določenem zrakoplovu, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [14], je Nizozemska potrdila, da Reem Air vztrajno ne odpravlja pomanjkljivosti.
Reem Air demonstrated a lack of ability or willingness to address safety deficiencies.
Reem Air je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti ali pripravljenosti za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
Reem Air did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of the Netherlands regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication as demonstrated by the absence of reply to the correspondence sent by this Member State.
Reem Air se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo, ki jo je opravila uprava za civilno letalsko Nizozemske glede varnostnega vidika njegove dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
There is no evidence of the implementation of an adequate corrective action plan presented by Reem Air to correct the identified serious safety deficiencies in response to the request from the Netherlands.
Ni dokazov o izvedbi ustreznega korekcijskega akcijskega načrta, ki ga je predstavil Reem Air, da bi popravil ugotovljene resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti kot odgovor na zahtevo Nizozemske.
The authorities of Kirghizstan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Reem Air have not exercised an adequate oversight on this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention, as demonstrated by the persistence of serious safety deficiencies.
Organi Kirgistana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Reem Air, niso opravili ustreznega nadzora nad tem prevoznikom v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije, kar je razvidno iz vztrajnega ohranjanja resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
In addition, information provided to the Commission by Reem Air during the hearing granted to this company evidences that, while Reem Air Operator’s Certificate was issued by Kyrgyzstan, this airline has its principal place of business in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Poleg tega je iz podatkov, ki jih je Komisiji zagotovil Reem Air med zaslišanjem, ki je bilo tej družbi odobreno, razvidno, da medtem ko je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika za Reem Air izdal Kirgistan, ima ta letalski prevoznik svoj glavni sedež v Združenih arabskih emiratih (ZAE), kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami Priloge 6 Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Reem Air does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Reem Air ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Silverback Cargo Freighters.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Silverback Cargo Freighters.
These deficiencies have been identified by Belgium during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [15].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanjem na ploščadi, opravljenim po programu SAFA [15], ugotovila Belgija.
Silverback Cargo Freighters which equally assures the maintenance (A&B checks) of its own aircraft, did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of this Member State regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication as demonstrated by the lack of pertinent response to requests made by this Member State.
Silverback Cargo Freighters, ki tudi zagotavlja vzdrževanje (pregledi A&B) lastnih zrakoplovov, ni ustrezno odgovoril na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo te države članice glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na zahteve te države članice.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Silverback Cargo Freighters does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Silverback Cargo Freighters ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
Air carriers from the Democratic Republic of Congo
Letalski prevozniki iz Demokratične republike Kongo
In spite of its efforts, the civil aviation authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo (‘DRC’) have persistent difficulties to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards, as demonstrated by the ICAO-USOAP — Audit Summary Report of the Directorate of Civil Aviation of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa, 11-18 June 2001).
Demokratična republika Kongo (DRK) ima kljub naporom vztrajne težave pri izvajanju in uveljavljanju ustreznih varnostnih standardov, kar je razvidno Zbirnega revizijskega poročila Direktorata za civilno letalstvo Demokratične republike Kongo, pripravljenega v okviru ICAO-USOAP (Kinšasa, 11.–18. junij 2001).
In particular, no system for the certification of Air Operators is currently in place.
Zlasti je ugotovljeno, da ni vzpostavljenega nobenega sistema za certifikacijo letalskih prevoznikov.
The authorities of the DRC with responsibility for regulatory oversight have consequently shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight.
Organi DRK, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvedbo ustreznega varnostnega nadzora.
An operating ban is imposed on Central Air Express because of substantiated deficiencies related to international safety standards, and its lack of cooperation with a Member State.
Prepoved opravljanja letov se uvede za Central Air Express zaradi utemeljenih pomanjkljivosti glede mednarodnih varnostnih standardov in pomanjkanja sodelovanja z državo članico.
Belgium [16] and Hewa Bora Airways (HBA) have provided information showing that, in the case of HBA, the deficiencies observed in the past by the Belgian authorities have been significantly corrected with respect to certain aircraft.
Belgija [16] in Hewa Bora Airways (HBA) sta zagotovili informacije, ki kažejo, da so bile pomanjkljivosti, ki so jih v preteklosti opazili belgijski organi, znatno popravljene glede nekaterih zrakoplovov.
Belgium has further informed the Commission that it intends to conduct systematic ramp inspections of HBA.
Belgija je nadalje obvestila Komisijo, da namerava izvajati sistematska preverjanja HBA na ploščadi.
In view of this, it is considered that this air carrier should be allowed to continue its current operations.
Zato se oceni, da je t reba temu letalskemu prevozniku dovoliti, da nadaljuje sedanje dejavnosti.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in the Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC) should be included in Annex A with the exception of Hewa Bora Airways (HBA) which should be included in Annex B.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da je treba vse letalske prevoznike, ki so certificirani v Demokratični republiki Kongo (DRK), vključiti v Prilogo A razen Hewa Bora Airways (HBA), ki ga je treba vključiti v Prilogo B.
Air carriers from Equatorial Guinea
Letalski prevozniki iz Ekvatorialne Gvineje
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial Guinea did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of the United Kingdom (UK) when concerns about the safety of the operation of carriers licensed or certified in that state were raised.
Organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso polno sodelovali z upravo Združenega kraljestva (ZK) za civilno letalstvo, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki glede varnosti delovanja letalskih prevoznikov, licenciranih ali certificiranih v tej državi.
The UK wrote to the Director General of Civil Aviation in Equatorial Guinea on 27 March 2002 [17] seeking clarification on the following points:
Združeno kraljestvo je v dopisu Generalnemu direktorju za civilno letalsko (DGCA) v Ekvatorialni Gvineji 27. marca 2002 [17] zahtevalo pojasnilo v zvezi z naslednjim:
a significant increase in the number of aircraft registered in Equatorial Guinea and suggestions that the Aircraft Registration Bureau (ARB) or a similar organisation might be managing the register,
znatnim povečanjem števila zrakoplovov, registriranih v Ekvatorialni Gvineji, in navedbo, da register verjetno ureja Urad za registracijo zrakoplovov (ARB) ali podobna organizacija;
the fact that a number of operators holding an Air Operator Certificate (AOC) issued by Equatorial Guinea did not have their principal place of business in Equatorial Guinea.
dejstvom, da številni operaterji, ki imajo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika (AOC), izdano v Ekvatorialni Gvineji, nimajo svojega glavnega sedeža v Ekvatorialni Gvineji.
The letter also advised the Director General of Civil Aviation that the UK would not be in a position to allow further commercial operations to its territory by Equatorial Guinea airlines until the UK authorities were satisfied that these airlines were receiving satisfactory oversight.
V dopisu je Združeno kraljestvo tudi obvestilo Generalnega direktorja za civilno letalstvo, da ne več bo moglo dovoljevati nadaljnjih komercialnih letov prevoznikov Ekvatorialne Gvineje na svojem ozemlju, dokler organi Združenega kraljestva ne ugotovijo, da so ti letalski prevozniki pod zadovoljivim nadzorom.
Equatorial Guinea did not reply to this letter.
Ekvatorialna Gvineja na ta dopis ni odgovorila.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial Guinea have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards, in particular as demonstrated by audits and related corrective action plans established under ICAO’s Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme.
Organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov, kar je zlasti razvidno iz revizij in z njimi povezanih korekcijskih akcijskih načrtov, uvedenih na podlagi Univerzalnega programa za presojo nadzora nad varnostjo (USOAP) ICAO.
Such a USOAP audit of Equatorial Guinea took place in May 2001 whereby the audit report [18] indicated that the Civil Aviation Authority did not, at the time of the audit, have the ability to provide adequate oversight to its airlines and ensure that they operate in accordance with ICAO standards.
Taka revizija USOAP Ekvatorialne Gvineje je bila opravljena maja 2001, pri čemer je revizijsko poročilo [18] navedlo, da uprava za civilno letalstvo v času revizije ni bila zmožna zagotoviti ustreznega nadzora nad svojimi prevozniki in zagotoviti, da delujejo v skladu s standardi ICAO.
These audit findings namely included:
Ugotovitve revizije vsebujejo:
lack of an organisation capable of undertaking safety oversight activities, in particular a lack of specialised staff in the areas of licensing, aircraft operations or airworthiness,
ni organizacije, ki bi bila sposobna izvajati dejavnosti varnostnega nadzora, zlasti pa obstaja pomanjkanje specializiranega osebja na področjih podeljevanja dovoljenj, delovanja zrakoplovov ali plovnosti;
inability to identify the number of aircraft on the register or the number of valid certificates of airworthiness issued,
nezmožnost ugotovitve števila zrakoplovov v registru ali števila izdanih veljavnih spričeval o plovnosti;
failure to establish a structured system for the certification and supervision of air operators,
ni vzpostavljenega strukturiranega sistema za certifikacijo in nadzor nad letalskimi prevozniki;
failure to adopt aeronautical operations regulations,
ni sprejetih predpisov za letalske operacije;
failure to perform surveillance on authorised operators,
ni izvajanja nadzora nad pooblaščenimi operaterji;
failure to implement a system for performing the basic duties of an airworthiness inspection agency.
ni izvajanja sistema za izvedbo osnovnih nalog inšpekcijske agencije za plovnost.
Furthermore the Directorate General of Civil Aviation of Equatorial Guinea has never up to date submitted to ICAO an action plan to address these audit findings [19] and consequently an audit follow up mission has not taken place.
Poleg tega Generalni direktorat za civilno letalstvo Ekvatorialne Gvineje do danes ni predložil ICAO akcijskega načrta, ki bi obravnaval te ugotovitve revizije [19], in posledično ni bilo izvedeno nadaljnje spremljanje revizije.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial Guinea have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov v skladu z obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
In fact, some holders of Air Operator Certificate (AOC) issued by Equatorial Guinea do not have their principal place of business in Equatorial Guinea, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention [20].
Dejansko nekateri imetniki spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC), ki ga je izdala Ekvatorialna Gvineja, nimajo glavnega sedeža v Ekvatorialni Gvineji v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji [20].
The authorities of Equatorial Guinea with responsibility for regulatory oversight of the following air carriers have shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight on these carriers: Air Consul SA, Avirex Guinée Equatoriale, COAGE — Compagnie Aeree de Guinée Equatorial, Ecuato Guineana de Aviación, Ecuatorial Cargo, GEASA — Guinea Ecuatorial Airlines SA, GETRA — Guinea Ecuatorial de Transportes Aéreos, Jetline Inc., King Transavia Cargo, Prompt Air GE SA, UTAGE — Unión de Transporte Aéreo de Guinea Ecuatorial.
Organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad spodaj navedenimi letalskimi prevozniki, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvajanje varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki: Air Consul SA, Avirex Guinée Equatoriale, COAGE – Compagnie Aeree de Guinée Equatorial, Ecuato Guineana de Aviación, Ecuatorial Cargo, GEASA – Guinea Ecuatorial Airlines SA, GETRA – Guinea Ecuatorial de Transportes Aéreos, Jetline Inc., King Transavia Cargo, Prompt Air GE SA, UTAGE – Unión de Transporte Aéreo de Guinea Ecuatorial.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in Equatorial Guinea should be subject to an operating ban and included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za vse letalske prevoznike, certificirane v Ekvatorialni Gvineji, veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in da jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
Air carriers from Liberia
Letalski prevozniki iz Liberije
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of International Air Services certified in Liberia.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih International Air Services, certificiranega v Liberiji.
These deficiencies have been identified by France, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [21].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [21], ugotovila Francija.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of the United Kingdom (UK) when informed of serious safety deficiencies identified during a ramp inspection of a Liberian-registered aircraft carried out by the UK civil aviation authority on 5 March 1996 [22].
Organi Liberije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Združenega kraljestva (ZK), ko so bili obveščeni o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih, ugotovljenih med pregledom na ploščadi, ki ga je 5. marca 1996 izvedla uprava za civilno letalstvo Združenega kraljestva [22] na zrakoplovu, registriranem v Liberiji.
Concerns about the safety of the operation of carriers licensed or certified in Liberia were promptly raised when on 12 March 1996 the Liberian DCA was advised by the UK civil aviation authority that all requests for permits for Liberian registered aircraft to operate commercial services to the UK would be refused until the Liberian authorities could demonstrate the existence of an effective regulatory system to ensure the airworthiness of aircraft on the Liberian register.
Pomisleki glede varnosti obratovanja prevoznikov, licenciranih ali certificiranih v Liberiji, so bili izraženi takoj, ko je 12. marca 1996 uprava Združenega kraljestva za civilno letalstvo obvestila liberijski DCA, da bodo zavrnjeni vsi zahtevki za dovoljenja za zrakoplove, registrirane v Liberiji, za opravljanje komercialnih letov v Združeno kraljestvo, dokler liberijski organi ne dokažejo obstoj učinkovitega regulativnega sistema za zagotovitev plovnosti zrakoplovov v liberijskem registru.
No response was ever received from the Liberian authorities.
Liberijski organi niso poslali nobenega odgovora.
Likewise, the Liberian authorities did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of France by declining to reply when the latter Member State raised concerns about the safety of the operation of a carrier licensed or certified in Liberia.
Liberijski organi tudi niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Francije, ker so odklonili odgovor, ko je slednja država članica izrazila pomisleke o varnosti delovanja prevoznika, licenciranega ali certificiranega v Liberiji.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards.
Organi Liberije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
The Government of Liberia itself admitted in 1996 [23] that it was unable to maintain regulatory control over Liberian registered aircraft because of the civil conflict.
Vlada Liberije je leta 1996 [23] sama priznala, da zaradi državljanske vojne ne more vzdrževati regulativnega nadzora nad zrakoplovi, registriranimi v Liberiji.
While the Comprehensive Peace Agreement was signed in 2003 and the UN and the National Transitional Government of Liberia are slowly putting in place measures to improve security, it is unlikely that the Government’s ability to regulate its register has improved since 1996.
Čeprav je bil celovit mirovni sporazum podpisan leta 2003 in ZN ter prehodna nacionalna vlada Liberije počasi vzpostavljata ukrepe za izboljšanje varnosti, ni verjetno, da se je od leta 1996 izboljšala sposobnost vlade, da ureja svoj register.
ICAO has not yet carried out a USOAP audit of Liberia because of the security situation.
Zaradi varnostnega stanja ICAO še ni izvedel revizije USOAP v Liberiji.
The authorities of Liberia with responsibility for regulatory oversight of the following air carriers have shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight on these carriers: International Air Services Inc., Satgur Air Transport Corp., Weasua Air Transport Co. Ltd.
Organi Liberije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad spodaj navedenimi letalskimi prevozniki, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvajanje varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki: International Air Services Inc., Satgur Air Transport Corp., Weasua Air Transport Co. Ltd.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in Liberia should be subject to an operating ban and included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za vse letalske prevoznike, certificirane v Liberiji, veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in da jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
Air carriers from Sierra Leone
Letalski prevozniki Sierra Leone
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Universal Ltd. These deficiencies have been identified by Sweden during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [24].
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Air Universal Ltd. Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanjem na ploščadi, izvedenim po programu SAFA [24], ugotovila Švedska.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of Sweden when concerns about the safety of the operation of Air Universal Ltd. certified in that state were raised, as demonstrated by the lack of response to the correspondence from this Member State.
Organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Švedske, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki glede varnosti delovanja Air Universal Ltd, certificiranega v tej državi, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni bilo odgovora na korespondenco iz te države članice.
The operating authorisation or technical permission of any carrier under the oversight of Sierra Leone has previously been refused or revoked by the United Kingdom.
Združeno kraljestvo je že prej zavrnilo ali preklicalo dovoljenje za opravljanje prometa ali tehnično dovoljenje za vse prevoznike pod nadzorom Sierra Leone.
While the Air Operator’s Certificate of Air Universal Ltd was issued by Sierra Leone, evidence shows that the airline has currently its principal place of business in Jordan, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Čeprav je bilo spričevalo letalskega prevoznika za Air Universal Ltd izdano v Sierra Leone, se je izkazalo, da ima zdaj prevoznik svoj glavni sedež v Jordaniji, kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
The authorities of Sierra Leone with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Universal Ltd have not exercised an adequate oversight on this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Air Universal Ltd, niso opravili ustreznega nadzora nad tem prevoznikom v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Universal Ltd. does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Air Universal Ltd. ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of air carriers certified in Sierra Leone.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih letalskih prevoznikov, certificiranih v Sierra Leone.
These deficiencies have been identified by three Member States, the UK, Malta and Sweden, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [25].
Te pomanjkljivosti so med preverjanji na ploščadi po programu SAFA [25] ugotovile tri države članice, Združeno kraljestvo, Malta in Švedska.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authorities of Sweden and of Malta when concerns about the safety of the operation of Air Universal Ltd certified in that state were raised as demonstrated by the lack of response to the correspondence from this Member State.
Organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso polno sodelovali z upravama za civilno letalstvo Švedske in Malte, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki glede varnosti delovanja Air Universal Ltd, certificiranega v tej državi, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni bilo odgovora na korespondenco iz te države članice.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.