natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee [1] Not yet published in the Official Journal.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora [1] Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
The second subparagraph of Article 12(3)(a) of the sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [2], lays down that the Council shall decide on the level of the standard rate to be applied after 31 December 2005.
Drugi pododstavek člena 12(3)(a) šeste Direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [2] določa, da Svet odloči o višini splošne stopnje, ki se uporablja po 31. decembru 2005.
The standard rate of value added tax (VAT) currently in force in the various Member States, combined with the mechanisms of the transitional system, has ensured that this system has functioned to an acceptable degree.
Splošna stopnja davka na dodano vrednost, ki trenutno velja v državah članicah skupaj z mehanizmom prehodnega sistema, zagotavlja, da ta sistem deluje na sprejemljivi stopnji.
It is nonetheless important to prevent a growing divergence in the standard rates of VAT applied by the Member States from leading to structural imbalances within the Community and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity.
Vendar pa je kljub temu pomembno, da se prepreči naraščajoča razlika v splošnih stopnjah DDV, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, da ne bi prišlo do strukturnih neskladij v Skupnosti in izkrivljanja konkurence v nekaterih sektorjih dejavnosti.
It is therefore appropriate to maintain the minimum standard rate at 15 % for a further period long enough to cover the ongoing implementation of the strategy to simplify and modernise current Community legislation on VAT.
Zato je primerno, da se ohrani najnižja splošna stopnja 15 % za nadaljnje obdobje, ki bo dovolj dolgo, da se omogoči nadaljevanje izvajanja strategije poenostavitve in posodobitve veljavne zakonodaje Skupnosti o DDV.
Directive 77/388/EEC should be amended accordingly,
Zato je primerno, da se Direktiva 77/388/EGS spremeni –
The first and second subparagraphs of Article 12(3)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC shall be replaced by the following:
Prvi in drugi pododstavek člena 12(3)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS se nadomestita z naslednjim:
‘The standard rate of value added tax shall be fixed by each Member State as a percentage of the taxable amount and shall be the same for the supply of goods and for the supply of services.
„Splošno stopnjo davka na dodano vrednost določi vsaka država članica kot odstotek od davčne osnove in je enaka za dobavo blaga in za opravljanje storitev.
From 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010, the standard rate may not be less than 15 %.
Od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2010 splošna stopnja ne sme biti nižja od 15 %.
The Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate to be applied after 31 December 2010.’
Svet v skladu s členom 93 Pogodbe odloči o višini splošne stopnje, ki se bo uporabljala po 31. decembru 2010.“.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive with effect from 1 January 2006.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo z učinkom od 1. januarja 2006.
When Member States adopt the measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Države članice se sprejetih predpisih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
Council Directive 2005/93/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2005/93/ES
amending Directive 69/169/EEC as regards the temporary quantitative restriction on beer imports into Finland
o spremembi Direktive 69/169/EGS v zvezi z začasnimi količinskimi omejitvami uvoza piva na Finsko
Articles 4 and 5 of Council Directive 69/169/EEC of 28 May 1969 on the harmonisation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to exemption from turnover tax and excise duty on imports in international travel [3] provide for allowances in respect of excisable goods contained in the luggage of travellers coming from third countries on condition that such imports have no commercial character.
V členih 4 in 5 Direktive Sveta 69/169/EGS z dne 28. maja 1969 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o oprostitvi prometnega davka in trošarin na uvoz pri mednarodnih potovanjih [3] je predvidena oprostitev za trošarinsko blago v prtljagi potnikov, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav, pod pogojem, da tak uvoz ni komercialne narave.
Directive 69/169/EEC allows Finland until 31 December 2005 to restrict the import of beer by individuals to not less than 6 litres per person due to serious economic difficulties of Finnish retail traders in the border region as well as a considerable loss of revenue caused by the increased import of beer from third countries.
Direktiva 69/169/EGS dovoljuje Finski, da zaradi resnih ekonomskih težav finskih trgovcev na drobno na mejnih območjih in znatne izgube prihodkov, kar je posledica povečanega uvoza piva iz tretjih držav, do 31. decembra 2005 omeji uvoz piva, ki ga uvozijo posamezniki, na ne manj od 6 litrov na osebo.
Finland has applied the allowance only to a limited extent and restricted the import of beer to a maximum 16 litres per person.
Finska je uporabila dovoljenje samo v omejenem obsegu in omejila uvoz piva na največ 16 litrov na osebo.
The accession of new Member States has provided new opportunities for people travelling from one of the Member States, especially from Estonia, who wish to bring beer into Finland.
Pristop novih držav članic je potnikom, ki potujejo iz ene od držav članic, zlasti iz Estonije, in želijo na Finsko vnesti pivo, ponudil novo priložnost.
Finland reacted to this situation by reducing tax rates on alcoholic beverages across the board by, on average, 33 %, which is by far the most significant change for 40 years.
Finska se je odzvala na te razmere z zmanjšanjem davčne stopnje na alkoholne pijače za povprečno 33 %, kar je zdaleč najpomembnejša sprememba v 40 letih.
The reduction in alcohol tax rates has led not only to significant losses of excise duty revenue but also to increased problems in relation to alcohol policy and to social and health policy.
Zmanjšanje davčnih stopenj na alkohol je pomenilo ne samo pomembno izgubo prihodka iz trošarin, temveč tudi povečanje težav, povezanih s politikami v zvezi z alkoholom, socialo in zdravstvom.
Furthermore, problems in public order and an increase in alcohol-related crime have arisen.
Poleg tega je prišlo do težav z javnim redom in naraščanja kriminala, povezanega z alkoholom.
Finland has requested a derogation from Article 4(1) of Directive 69/169/EEC to apply a maximum limit for beer imports by travellers from third countries of not less than 16 litres per person.
Finska je za uvoz piva, ki ga potniki uvozijo iz tretjih držav, zahtevala odstopanje od člena 4(1) Direktive 69/169/EGS za uporabo največje omejitve, ki ni manjša od 16 litrov na osebo.
Account should be taken of the geographical situation of Finland, the economic difficulties of the Finnish retail traders located in the border regions and the considerable loss of revenue caused by the increased imports of beer from third countries.
Upoštevati je treba geografski položaj Finske, ekonomske težave finskih trgovcev na drobno iz obmejnih regij in znatno izgubo prihodkov, ki je posledica povečanega uvoza piva iz tretjih držav.
For those reasons and in the light of the current reflections on a general revision of the values and quantities of goods set out in Directive 69/169/EEC, it is appropriate to authorise Finland to apply the requested derogation for a further period until 31 December 2007,
Iz teh razlogov in z vidika trenutnih premislekov o splošni spremembi vrednosti in količin blaga, določenih v Direktivi 69/169/EGS, je primerno, da se Finski dovoli uporaba zahtevanega odstopanja za obdobje do 31. decembra 2007 –
Article 5(9) of Directive 69/169/EEC shall be replaced by the following:
V členu 5 Direktive 69/169/EGS se odstavek 9 nadomesti:
By way of derogation from Article 4(1), Finland shall be authorised, until 31 December 2007, to apply a maximum quantitative limit of not less than 16 litres for the importation of beer from third countries.’
Z odstopanjem od člena 4(1) lahko Finska do 31. decembra 2007 uporablja količinsko omejitev, ki ni manjša od 16 litrov, za uvoz piva iz tretjih držav.“
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2005.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, do 31. decembra 2005.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of such laws, regulations or administrative provisions, together with a table showing the correlation between them and this Directive.
Komisiji takoj sporočijo besedila tistih določb in tabelo ujemanja med temi določbami in to direktivo.
When they are adopted by Member States, those measures shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Ko države članice sprejmejo te predpise, se morajo sklicevati na to direktivo ali pa se nanjo sklicujejo ob uradni objavi.
Opinion delivered on 13 December 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 13. decembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Opinion delivered on 14 December 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 14. decembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 133, 4.6.1969, p. 6.
UL L 133, 4.6.1969, str. 6.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2000/47/EC (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 73).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2000/47/ES (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 73).
Council Directive 2005/94/EC
Direktiva sveta 2005/94/ES
on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC
o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence in razveljavitvi Direktive 92/40/EGS
Avian influenza is a serious, highly contagious disease of poultry and other captive birds caused by different types of influenza viruses.
Aviarna influenca je resna, zelo nalezljiva bolezen perutnine in drugih ptic v ujetništvu, ki jo povzročajo različni tipi virusov influence.
Those viruses may also spread to mammals, in particular pigs, and humans.
Ti virusi se lahko širijo tudi na sesalce, zlasti na prašiče in ljudi.
Since poultry is covered by live animals listed in Annex I to the Treaty, one of the Community's tasks in the veterinary field is to improve the health status of poultry, thereby facilitating trade in poultry and poultry products and ensuring the development of this sector.
Ker je v Prilogi I Pogodbe med živalimi navedena tudi živa perutnina, je ena od nalog Skupnosti na področju veterine izboljšati zdravstveni status perutnine in s tem okrepiti trgovino s perutnino in perutninskimi proizvodi ter zagotoviti razvoj tega sektorja.
Furthermore, a high level of human health protection is to be ensured when defining and implementing Community policies and activities.
Poleg tega je treba pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju politik in dejavnosti Skupnosti zagotoviti visoko raven varovanja zdravja ljudi.
Influenza viruses include a large number of different virus strains.
Virusi influence vsebujejo veliko število različnih sevov virusov.
The level of risks posed by the different strains of influenza viruses for animal and public health is very variable and to some extent unpredictable, due to rapid virus mutation and possible re-assortment of the genetic material between different strains.
Raven tveganj, ki jih predstavljajo različni sevi virusov influence za zdravje živali in ljudi, je zelo spremenljiva in do neke mere nepredvidljiva zaradi hitre mutacije virusa in možne prerazporeditve genskega materiala med različnimi sevi.
The infection with certain strains of influenza viruses of avian origin may trigger outbreaks in domestic birds of epizootic proportions, causing mortality and disturbances of poultry on a scale, which can threaten in particular the profitability of poultry farming as a whole.
Okužba z določenimi sevi virusov influence aviarnega izvora lahko sproži izbruhe bolezni pri domači perutnini v epizootskih razsežnostih in povzroči umrljivost in motnje pri perutnini v takšnem obsegu, da je lahko ogrožena donosnost celotnega sektorja reje perutnine.
Community measures for the control of avian influenza were established by Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza [3], in order to ensure the protection of animal health and contribute to the development of the poultry sector.
Ukrepi Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence so bili določeni z Direktivo Sveta 92/40/EGS z dne 19. maja 1992 o uvedbi ukrepov Skupnosti za nadzor aviarne influence [3], da se zagotovi zdravstveno varstvo živali in prispeva k razvoju perutninskega sektorja.
The measures laid down in Directive 92/40/EEC should be fundamentally reviewed in the light of recent scientific knowledge on the risks of avian influenza for animal and public health, development of new laboratory tests and vaccines and the lessons learnt during recent outbreaks of this disease in the Community as well as in third countries.
Ukrepe, določene v Direktivi 92/40/EGS, je treba temeljito pregledati ob upoštevanju najnovejših znanstvenih dognanj o nevarnostih aviarne influence za zdravje živali in ljudi, razvoja novih laboratorijskih testov in cepiv ter izkušenj, pridobljenih med zadnjimi izbruhi te bolezni v Skupnosti in tudi v tretjih državah.
The new Community measures should also take account of the most recent opinions delivered by the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare and by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the changes in the Terrestrial Animal Health Code and the Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals of the International Office of Epizootics (O.I.E.) on avian influenza.
Novi ukrepi Skupnosti morajo upoštevati tudi najnovejša mnenja Znanstvenega odbora za zdravje in dobro počutje živali in Evropske agencije za varnost hrane (EFSA) ter spremembe Zoosanitarnega kodeksa za kopenske živali ter Priročnika diagnostičnih testov in cepiv za kopenske živali Mednarodne organizacije za zdravje živali (O.I.E.) v zvezi z aviarno influenco.
Certain influenza viruses of avian origin may in some circumstances affect humans and may then pose a serious risk to public health.
Nekateri virusi aviarnega izvora lahko v določenih okoliščinah okužijo ljudi in so lahko resna nevarnost za javno zdravje.
The provisions of this Directive, which aim at fighting the disease in farmed animals, could indirectly contribute to preventing public health problems.
Določbe te direktive, ki so usmerjene v boj proti bolezni pri rejnih živalih, bi lahko posredno prispevale k preprečevanju težav v javnem zdravstvu.
However, it is, at this stage, chiefly for the Member States to tackle such problems.
Vendar v tem trenutku sodi spopadanje s takšnimi težavami med prednostne naloge držav članic.
At Community level, the human health risks posed by influenza viruses are primarily dealt with by other actions and legal acts.
Na ravni Skupnosti se tveganja za zdravje ljudi, ki jih predstavljajo virusi influence, v prvi vrsti obravnavajo z drugimi ukrepi in pravnimi akti.
These concern in particular the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (hereinafter referred to as ‘ECDC’), established by Regulation (EC) No 851/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], the recommendations issued by the Commission on Community Influenza pandemic preparedness and response planning, the European Union Early Warning and Response System and the establishment of the European Influenza Surveillance Scheme.
Predvsem jih obravnavajo Evropski center za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni (v nadaljnjem besedilu „ECDC“), ustanovljen z Uredbo (ES) št. 851/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] ter priporočila Komisije o pripravljenosti Skupnosti na pandemijo influence in načrtovanje odzivnosti, sistem zgodnjega obveščanja in odzivanja Evropske unije ter vzpostavitev Evropske sheme obvladovanja influence.
It is appropriate, however, for the Commission to assess together with ECDC whether further public health or workers' health and safety measures, complementing the animal health provisions of this Directive are needed at Community level to address the risks posed by certain influenza viruses of avian origin to humans and in particular for workers in contact with infected animals and to present any necessary legislative proposals.
Ustrezno pa je, da Komisija skupaj z ECDC oceni, ali so na ravni Skupnosti potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi na področju javnega zdravstva ali zdravstveni in varnostni ukrepi za zaposlene, ki dopolnjujejo določbe o zdravstvenem varstvu živali te direktive, da bi se soočili z nevarnostjo, ki jo predstavljajo nekateri virusi influence aviarnega izvora ljudem, zlasti zaposlenim, ki so v stiku z okuženimi živalmi, ter predstavili potrebne zakonodajne predloge.
Current knowledge indicates that the health risks posed by the so-called low pathogenic avian influenza viruses are inferior to the risks posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses, which originate from a mutation of certain low pathogenic viruses.
Sedanje znanje kaže, da je zdravstveno tveganje, ki ga predstavljajo tako imenovani virusi nizko patogene aviarne influence, nižje od tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo virusi visoko patogene aviarne influence, ki nastanejo z mutacijo določenih nizko patogenih različic virusov.
Community legislation for the control of avian influenza should enable Member States to adopt disease control measures in a proportionate and flexible manner, taking into account the various levels of risk posed by different virus strains, the likely social and economic impact of the measures in question on the agriculture sector and other sectors involved while at the same time ensuring that the measures taken for each specific disease scenario are the most appropriate.
Zakonodaja Skupnosti za obvladovanje aviarne influence mora dati državam članicam možnost sprejetja ukrepov za obvladovanje bolezni na sorazmeren in prožen način, ob upoštevanju različnih stopenj tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo različni sevi virusov, verjetnega socialnega in gospodarskega vpliva zadevnih ukrepov na kmetijski sektor in na druge vpletene sektorje, in hkrati zagotoviti, da so ukrepi, sprejeti za vsak specifični primer poteka bolezni, najustreznejši.
In view of the potential of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses to mutate into highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses, provision should be made for the early detection of infection in poultry aimed at a quick reaction and the adoption of appropriate and proportionate control and eradication measures which should include a system of active surveillance to be carried out by Member States.
Glede na možnost, da virusi nizko patogene aviarne influence mutirajo v viruse visoko patogene aviarne influence, je treba sprejeti določbe za zgodnje odkrivanje okužb pri perutnini, usmerjene v hitro odzivanje in sprejetje ustreznih in sorazmernih ukrepov za obvladovanje in izkoreninjenje, ki morajo vključevati sistem aktivnega sistematičnega nadzora, ki ga izvajajo države članice.
Such surveillance should follow general guidelines to be adapted in the light of further knowledge and developments in this field.
Tak sistematični nadzor mora slediti splošnim smernicam, ki jih je treba prilagoditi glede na nadaljnje znanje in razvoj na tem področju.
Any suspicion of avian influenza infection which may arise from clinical or laboratory investigations or any other reason that leads to the suspicion of the presence of infection should set in motion immediate official investigations so that prompt and effective action can be taken, as appropriate.
Vsak sum okužbe z aviarno influenco, ki se lahko pojavi pri kliničnih ali laboratorijskih preiskavah, ali kakršen koli drug razlog, zaradi katerega se pojavi sum prisotnosti okužbe, mora sprožiti takojšnje uradne preiskave, da se lahko hitro in učinkovito ukrepa, kot je ustrezno.
Such action should be reinforced as soon as the presence of infection is confirmed to include depopulation of the holdings infected and of those which are at risk of infection.
Te dejavnosti je treba okrepiti takoj, ko se potrdi prisotnost okužbe, z vključitvijo depopulacije okuženega gospodarstva in tistih, za katere obstaja tveganje, da se okužijo.
In the case of detection of infection with low pathogenic avian influenza virus, control measures may differ from those which should apply in the case of detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, taking into account the different levels of risk posed by these two conditions.
V primeru odkritja okužbe z virusom nizko patogene aviarne influence se lahko ukrepi za obvladovanje razlikujejo od tistih, ki se izvajajo v primeru odkritja virusa visoko patogene aviarne influence, ob upoštevanju različnih stopenj tveganja, ki jih predstavljata ti dve stanji.
Disease control measures and in particular the establishment of restriction zones should also be modulated taking into account the density of the poultry population as well as other risk factors in the area in which the infection has been detected.
Ukrepe za obvladovanje bolezni in zlasti uvedbo območij z omejitvami je prav tako treba prilagoditi ob upoštevanju gostote populacije perutnine ter drugih dejavnikov tveganja na območju, kjer je bila odkrita okužba.
If an outbreak occurs, it is also necessary to prevent any further spread of infection by carefully monitoring and restricting movements of poultry and the use of products liable to be contaminated, by tightening biosecurity measures at all levels of poultry production, by cleansing and disinfecting the infected holding, by establishing protection and surveillance zones around the outbreak and, if necessary, by vaccination.
Če pride do izbruha, je treba preprečiti tudi kakršno koli nadaljnje širjenje okužbe z natančnim monitoringom in omejevanjem premikov perutnine ter uporabe proizvodov, ki bi lahko bili kontaminirani, s pojačanimi biološkimi varnostnimi ukrepi na vseh nivojih perutninske proizvodnje, s čiščenjem in razkuževanjem okuženih gospodarstev, z določitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij okrog izbruha in po potrebi s cepljenjem.
Community measures for the control of highly pathogenic avian influenza should be based first on the depopulation of the infected flocks, in accordance with Community legislation on animal welfare.
Ukrepi Skupnosti za obvladovanje visoko patogene aviarne influence morajo temeljiti najprej na depopulaciji okuženih jat, v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti o dobrem počutju živali.
Council Directive 93/119/EC of 22 December 1993 on the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing [5] sets out the minimum standards for the protection of animals at the time of slaughter or killing including for the purpose of disease control.
Direktiva Sveta 93/119/ES z dne 22. decembra 1993 o zaščiti živali pri zakolu ali usmrtitvi [5] določa minimalne standarde za varstvo živali pri zakolu ali usmrtitvi, vključno z namenom obvladovanja bolezni.
Such rules apply fully to slaughter or killing pursuant to this Directive.
Takšna pravila se izvajajo v celoti za zakol in usmrtitev na podlagi te direktive.
Vaccination against avian influenza can be an effective tool to supplement disease control measures and to avoid massive killing and destruction of poultry or other captive birds.
Cepljenje proti aviarni influenci je lahko učinkovito orodje za dopolnitev ukrepov za obvladovanje bolezni in za preprečitev masovnega pobijanja in uničevanja perutnine ali drugih ptic v ujetništvu.