natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They argued that, in those circumstances, they could not verify that the complainants were truly representative.
Trdili so, da v takšnih okoliščinah niso mogli preveriti pravne podlage pritožnikov.
However, it is noted that the individual production volume of each complainant was made available for inspection by the interested parties, thus even if the names of those companies were blanked out, their representative quality could be verified.
Vendar je treba omeniti, da je bil individualen obseg proizvodnje posameznega pritožnika zainteresiranim strankam na voljo v pregled, torej čeprav je bilo ime navedenih družb izbrisano, je bilo pravno podlago mogoče preveriti.
The claim was therefore rejected.
Zato je bil zahtevek zavrnjen.
Unrelated importers in the Community
Nepovezani uvozniki v Skupnosti:
Adidas Salomon AG, Germany,
Adidas Salomon AG, Nemčija,
C&J Clark International Limited, United Kingdom,
C&J Clark International Limited, Združeno kraljestvo,
George Clothing Ltd, United Kingdom,
George Clothing Ltd., Združeno kraljestvo,
Nike European Operations BV, The Netherlands,
Nike European Operations B.V., Nizozemska,
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport, Germany,
Puma AG Rudolf Dassler Sport, Nemčija,
Timberland Europe BV, The Netherlands.
Timberland Europe B.V., Nizozemska.
Exporting producers in PRC
Proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK
Heng Tai Hong Wei Shoes Co. Ltd (Heng Tai),
Heng Tai Hong Wei Shoes Co. Ltd. („Heng Ta“’),
In view of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers in the PRC and Vietnam to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country, Brazil in this case, took place at the premises of the following companies:
Ob upoštevanju potrebe po določitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK in Vietnamu, ki jim TGO morda ne bo odobren, je bil preveritveni obisk z namenom določitve normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov iz primerljive države, v tem primeru Brazilije, izveden v prostorih naslednjih družb:
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005 (the investigation period or IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. aprila 2004 do 31. marca 2005 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 to the end of the IP (the period considered).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product under investigation is footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather (footwear with uppers of leather), other than:
Izdelek v preiskavi je obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja ali umetnega usnja („obutev z zgornjim delom iz usnja“), razen:
sports footwear within the meaning of subheading note 1 to Chapter 64 of the Combined Nomenclature, i.e. (i) footwear which is designed for a sporting activity and has, or has provision for, the attachment of, spikes, sprigs, stops, clips, bars or the like, and (ii) skating boots, ski-boots and cross-country ski footwear, snowboard boots, wrestling boots, boxing boots and cycling shoes,
športne obutve v smislu opombe 1 k tarifni podštevilki k poglavju 64 carinske nomenklature, tj (i) obutve, namenjene za športne aktivnosti, ki ima ali je možno nanjo pritrditi trne, čepe, žeblje, kaveljčke, zaponke ali podobne izdelke, in (ii) čevljev za drsanje, smučanje, tek na smučeh, deskanje na snegu, rokoborbo, boks in kolesarjenje,
slippers and other indoor footwear,
copat in druge hišne obutve,
footwear with a protective toecap.
obutve s kovinsko kapico.
The product scope therefore mainly includes sandals, boots, urban footwear and city shoes.
Obseg izdelka zato v glavnem vključuje sandale, škornje, obutev za prosti čas in mestno obutev.
Special technology athletic footwear
Športna obutev, izdelana po posebni tehnologiji
Various exporting producers and importers claimed that certain specific types of sports footwear, other than those mentioned above, should also be excluded from the product scope.
Različni proizvajalci izvozniki in uvozniki so trdili, da je treba nekatere posebne vrste športne obutve, razen zgoraj omenjene, prav tako izključiti iz obsega izdelka.
This claim is based on the allegation that, in view of their specificities, such types of footwear and other types of footwear with uppers of leather could not be considered as forming one single product.
Ta zahtevek temelji na trditvi, da se glede na njihove posebne lastnosti taka vrsta obutve in druge vrste obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja ne morejo šteti za en sam izdelek.
More specifically, this claim concerns footwear for use in sporting activities and involving a special technology called ‘STAF’, i.e. special technology athletic footwear.
Natančneje, ta zahtevek zadeva obutev za uporabo pri športnih aktivnostih, izdelano po posebni tehnologiji, imenovani „STAF“ (Special Technology Athletic Footwear).
In this context, footwear for use in sporting activities should be taken to mean tennis shoes, basketball shoes, gym shoes, training shoes and the like.
V tem smislu je treba obutev za uporabi pri športnih aktivnostih šteti kot copate za tenis, košarko, gimnastiko in podobno.
The footwear concerned (i.e. STAF) is currently classified within CN codes: ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998.
Zadevna obutev (tj. STAF) se trenutno uvršča pod naslednje oznake KN: ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998.
The claims concerning STAF have been analysed in detail.
Zahtevki glede STAF so bili podrobno proučeni.
Firstly, it was established that STAF are highly sophisticated footwear that have distinctive technical features and are designed specifically for use in sporting activities.
Prvič, bilo je ugotovljeno, da je STAF visoko razvita obutev s posebnimi tehničnimi lastnostmi in je oblikovana za uporabo pri športnih aktivnostih.
Those features mainly include a complex outsole designed to protect part of the athlete's heel and forefoot and an additional mid-sole with special cushioning or stabilising elements featuring shock absorption and/or motion control.
Te lastnosti vključujejo zlasti zahtevno oblikovane podplate, da se zaščiti del športnikove pete in sprednjega stopala, ter dodatni srednji podplat s posebnim elementi za oblazinjene ali stabilnost z blažilnikom udarcev in/ali nadzorom gibanja (motion control).
Those features are essential in order to increase performance and avoid injuries when practising sporting activities.
Navedene lastnosti so bistvene za izboljšanje kakovosti in izogibanje poškodbam pri športnih aktivnostih.
To incorporate those features, significant research and development costs in terms of design, specially incorporated materials, as well as on-site testing are incurred.
Pri doseganju navedenih lastnosti nastanejo znatni stroški raziskav in razvoja v smislu oblikovanja, posebej vgrajenih materialov, ter preizkušanj.
Those additional costs generally result in a higher import price for STAF footwear as compared to other types of footwear.
Navedeni dodatni stroški ponavadi povzročijo višjo uvozno ceno obutve STAF v primerjavi z drugimi vrstami obutve.
Secondly, the investigation revealed that STAF is different from the other types of footwear since (i) it is normally sold via different sales channels, (ii) it has usually a different end-use and consumer perception and (iii) import trends of STAF have developed differently compared to other types of footwear.
Drugič, preiskava je pokazala, da je obutev STAF drugačna kot druge vrste obutve, ker (i) se običajno prodaja po različnih prodajnih poteh, (ii) ima ponavadi drugačnega končnega uporabnika in jo potrošniki drugače dojemajo ter (iii) so se gibanja uvoza obutve STAF v primerjavi z drugimi vrstami obutve razvijala drugače.
These differences are set out below in detail.
Te razlike so podrobno opisane v nadaljevanju.
Concerning the distribution channels, STAF is largely sold in stores that are exclusively specialised in sports equipment or, in the case of large brand retail chains or department stores, in displays/sections specifically dedicated to sports items.
Kar zadeva distribucijske poti, se obutev STAF večinoma prodaja v prodajalnah, specializiranih za športno opremo, oz. v primeru velikih drobnoprodajnih verig, ki se ukvarjajo s prodajo blagovnih znamk ali v veleblagovnicah v posebnih oddelkih s športnimi izdelki.
On the other hand, other types of footwear are mostly distributed via footwear retailers, brand or not, or even supermarkets.
Po drugi strani pa se druga vrsta obutve večinoma prodaja in kupuje prek trgovcev na drobno, ki se ukvarjajo s prodajo obutve z blagovnimi znamkami ali brez, ter celo supermarketov.
The fact that STAF is distributed via different sales channels also indicates that consumers perceive STAF differently from other types of footwear.
Dejstvo, da se obutev STAF prodaja in kupuje po različnih prodajnih poteh, kaže tudi na to, da potrošniki obutev STAF dojemajo drugače kot druge vrste obutve.
More precisely, it is also considered that consumers of sporting equipment clearly make the distinction between footwear specifically designed for sporting activities and other types of footwear, including those casual types of footwear that look like sports shoes (casual footwear), although not having the STAF characteristics.
Natančneje, šteje se tudi, da potrošniki športne opreme jasno razlikujejo med obutvijo, posebej oblikovano za športne aktivnosti, in drugimi vrstami obutve, vključno z obutvijo za prosti čas, ki izgleda kot športna obutev („obutev za vsak dan“), nima pa lastnosti obutve STAF.
In addition, while STAF could be used for daily, non-sportive use, similar to other types of footwear, those other types of footwear are certainly not suitable for sporting activities.
Poleg tega se lahko obutev STAF, podobno kot druge vrste obutve, uporablja v vsakdanje – ne športne – namene, medtem ko druge vrste obutve vsekakor niso primerne za športne aktivnosti.
Therefore the degree of interchangeability between STAF and non-STAF footwear is rather limited.
Zato je stopnja medsebojne zamenljivosti obutve STAF in druge vrste obutve omejena.
Moreover, the investigation showed that imports from the countries concerned of STAF developed differently in recent years as compared to the other types of footwear.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da se je uvoz obutve STAF iz zadevnih držav v preteklih letih razvijal drugače kot uvoz drugih vrst obutve.
While STAF import volumes even decreased by 5 % between 2003 and the IP, imports of non-STAF types rose by more than 50 % during the same period.
Dejansko se je obseg uvoza obutve STAF med letom 2003 in OP celo zmanjšal za 5 %, uvoz drugih vrst obutve pa se je v enakem obdobju povečal za več kot 50 %.
In terms of price developments, the decline in STAF import prices from the countries concerned was clearly less marked than for the other types of footwear: between 2003 and the IP, the average STAF price decreased by 6 %, whereas the average price for other types decreased by 12 %.
V smislu razvoja cene je bilo znižanje uvoznih cen obutve STAF iz zadevnih držav brez dvoma manj izrazito kot pri drugih vrstah obutve: med letom 2003 in OP se je povprečna cena obutve STAF znižala za 6 %, medtem ko se je povprečna cena drugih vrst znižala za 12 %.
Finally, the average import price of STAF from the countries concerned during the IP was almost 40 % higher than the non-STAF average import price.
In nazadnje, povprečna uvozna cena obutve STAF iz zadevnih držav je bila v OP skoraj 40 % višja od povprečne uvozne cene drugih vrst obutve.
For the above reasons, i.e. differences of basic physical and technical characteristics, sales channels, end-use and consumer perception, it is provisionally concluded that STAF should be excluded from the definition of the product concerned, and thus from the scope of this investigation.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov, tj. različnih osnovnih fizičnih in tehničnih lastnostih, prodajnih poteh, končne uporabe in dojemanja potrošnikov, se začasno sklene, da je treba obutev STAF izključiti iz opredelitve zadevnega izdelka in torej iz obsega te preiskave.
The Community footwear industry claimed that fashion trends in recent years have played an essential role as they have brought sports shoes into the market segment of casual footwear.
Predstavniki obutvene industrije Skupnosti so trdili, da so v preteklih letih bistveno vlogo igrali modni trendi, saj je zaradi njih športna obutev prišla v tržni segment obutve za vsak dan.
They also alleged that both types of footwear are sold through the same distribution outlets and that consumers often buy and use STAF for purposes other than sports.
Trdili so tudi, da se obe vrsti obutve prodajata po enakih distribucijskih poteh in da potrošniki pogosto kupujejo in uporabljajo obutev STAF tudi v druge, ne športne namene.
Therefore, in the opinion of the Community industry, STAF should not be excluded from the scope of the product concerned.
Zato bi bilo treba po mnenju industrije Skupnosti obutev STAF izključiti iz obsega zadevnega izdelka.
In this respect, even if fashion trends may have had an impact on the consumer's choice and preferences, they certainly do not affect the essential basic physical and technical characteristics of a product, and therefore do not alter the above conclusions.
Čeprav so modni trendi morda vplivali na izbiro potrošnika, pa vsekakor niso vplivali na bistvene osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti izdelka in zato se zgoraj navedeni sklepi ne spremenijo.
It is also considered that if casual footwear has become extremely popular in the last years, this fashion trend concerns casual shoes overall, and more specifically the look-alike sports type of shoes or even sports shoes not having STAF features.
Šteje se tudi, da čeprav je obutev za vsak dan v preteklih letih postala izredno popularna, ta modni trend zadeva obutev za vsak dan na splošno, in torej tudi vrsto obutve, ki le izgleda kot športno obutev, in celo športna obutev, ki nima lastnosti obutve STAF.
Even if STAF shoes may also, in the context of this fashion for casual shoes, be used for a purpose different from that for which they were designed, this remained a very limited phenomenon, which was moreover not based on the specific and unique features of STAF, but on the mere fact that they look similar to the look-alike sport shoes.
Četudi se je zaradi modnih trendov obutve za prosti čas obutev STAF uporabljala v drugačne namene kot tiste, zaradi katerih je bila oblikovana, je to ostal zelo omejen pojav in ni temeljil na posebnih in edinstvenih lastnostih obutve STAF, ampak na samem dejstvu, da izgleda podobno kot obutev za vsak dan z obliko športne obutve.
The claim that fashion trends resulted in an increasing consumption of STAF on the Community market is not supported by the import data.
Trditve, da je posledica modnih trendov povečanje potrošnje obutve STAF na trgu Skupnosti, podatki o uvozu ne podpirajo.
As a matter of fact, as shown above, STAF imports, thus Community consumption since this type of footwear is mainly produced in the two countries concerned with only very negligible production in the Community, decreased in recent years.
Kot je zgoraj pojasnjeno, se je uvoz obutve STAF in z njo tudi potrošnja Skupnosti, v preteklih letih zmanjšal, saj se ta vrsta obutve proizvaja predvsem v dveh zadevnih državah z zelo zanemarljivim obsegom proizvodnje v Skupnosti.
It should also be pointed out that the claim made by the Community industry referred to all types of sports shoes, and not specifically STAF, which were, as mentioned above, given that they look similar to the look-alike sport shoes, only marginally affected by the general fashion trend.
Poudarjeno je bilo tudi, da se je zahtevek, ki ga je vložila industrija Skupnosti, nanašal na vso športno obutev in ne le na obutev STAF, na katero je glede na zgoraj omenjeno dejstvo, da izgleda podobno kot obutev v obliki športnih čevljev, splošni modni trend le malo vplival.
It is however acknowledged that STAF are sometimes distributed in non-sports specialised retail shops, and that there may be a certain degree of competition between STAF and non-STAF type of footwear.
Vendar se priznava, da se lahko včasih obutev STAF prodaja tudi prodajalnam na drobno, ki niso specializirane za športne izdelke, in da lahko med obutvijo STAF in drugimi vrstami obutve obstaja določena raven konkurence.
However, as this remains within a limited scale, it is not deemed sufficient to alter the above conclusions.
Ker pa to ostaja v omejenem obsegu, se zdi navedeno dejstvo nezadostno za spremembo zgoraj navedenih sklepov.
One Member State opposed the exclusion of STAF from the scope of the proceeding on the grounds that this would imply a serious risk of circumvention.
Ena država članica je nasprotovala izključitvi obutve STAF iz obsega postopka, ker naj bi obstajalo resno tveganje izogibanja.
This is based on the allegation that a simple physical control is not sufficient to distinguish the different types of footwear, and that such distinction can be made only through a chemical analysis of the materials and technical tests on the mechanic components incorporated in the footwear.
To temelji na trditvi, da enostaven fizičen nadzor ni dovolj za razlikovanje med različnimi vrstami obutve in da je to mogoče le s kemijsko analizo materialov in s tehničnimi preskusi mehanskih komponent, vgrajenih v obutev.
While it is not excluded that a simple physical control is not always sufficient to differentiate between the types, this can not be considered a valid argument for the non-excludsion of STAF.
Sicer ni izključeno, da preprost fizičen nadzor ni zmeraj dovolj za razlikovanje med vrstami, vendar pa se to ne more šteti za trdno utemeljitev, zakaj se obutev STAF ne bi izključila iz obsega preiskave.
Indeed, the fact that it may sometimes physically to differentiate various types of shoes does not give rise to the above conclusions that STAF should be considered a different type from the other leather footwear.
Dejstvo, da je včasih težko glede na fizične lastnosti razlikovati različne vrste, ne spremeni zgoraj navedenih sklepov, da je treba obutev STAF v primerjavi z ostalo usnjeno obutvijo, šteti za drugo vrsto obutve.
In addition, in many other instances, more than a physical control is required in order to identify whether a product should or should not be covered by the scope of anti-dumping measures in place, and this was never considered sufficient not to exclude such product from the scope of the measures.
Poleg tega je v številnih drugih primerih potreben več kot fizični nadzor, da se lahko ugotovi, ali naj veljavni protidampinški ukrepi vključujejo določen izdelek ali ne, to pa se nikoli ni štelo za zadostno, da se takega izdelka ne izključi iz obsega ukrepov.
Finally, certain interested parties claimed that all types of sports footwear, thus not only STAF, should be excluded from the proceeding.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je treba vse vrste športne obutve, torej ne le obutev STAF, izključiti iz postopka.
These allegations are based on the same claims made for the exclusion of STAF.
Te trditve temeljijo na istih zahtevkih, vloženih glede izključitve obutve STAF.
The investigation however revealed that the conclusions with respect to STAF did not apply to footwear not having the STAF characteristics.
Preiskava pa je pokazala, da se sklepi v zvezi z obutvijo STAF niso enakovredno uporabljali za tisto obutev, ki ni imela lastnosti STAF.
Rather, it was found that the conclusions drawn in the two preceding recitals also apply in the case of those types of footwear, i.e. there is no clear dividing line and there is direct competition between those and the remaining types of footwear.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se sklepi, opisani v dveh prejšnjih uvodnih izjavah, uporabljajo tudi v primeru navedene vrste obutve, tj. ni jasne ločnice in obstaja neposredna konkurenca med navedenimi in preostalimi vrstami obutve.
Children's Footwear
Otroška obutev
For the purpose of this proceeding, it is provisionally established that children's footwear shall mean footwear with insoles of a length of less than 24 cm, and with a sole and heel combined having a height of 3 cm or less.
Za namen tega postopka se začasno določi, da otroška obutev pomeni obutev z vložki, dolgimi manj kot 24 cm, pri katerih podplat in peta skupaj nista višja od 3 cm.
Those types of footwear are currently classified within the CN codes: ex64032000, ex64033000, 64035111, 64035191, 64035931, 64035991, 64039111, 64039191, 64039931, 64039991 and ex64051000.
Te vrste obutve so trenutno uvrščene pod oznake KN: ex64032000, ex64033000, 64035111, 64035191, 64035931, 64035991, 64039111, 64039191, 64039931, 64039991 in ex64051000.
The investigation will further have to determine whether this definition should be modified for the purpose of any definitive measures.
Preiskava bo morala še določiti, ali bo treba zaradi kakršnih koli dokončnih ukrepov to opredelitev spremeniti.
It is recalled that, in a proceeding concerning footwear with uppers of leather and plastic [3], footwear with insoles of a length of less than 24 cm, was not considered to fall within the definition of the product concerned.
Treba je opozoriti, da se v postopku v zvezi z obutvijo z zgornjim delom iz usnja in plastike [3] obutev z vložki, dolgimi manj kot 24 cm, ni štela kot obutev, ki jo zajema opredelitev zadevnega izdelka.
The reason being that, in view of their specificities, children's footwear and other types of footwear with uppers of leather were, at the time, not considered as forming one single product.
Vzrok temu je bilo dejstvo, da se takrat otroška obutev in druge vrste obutve z zgornjim delom iz usnja zaradi svojih posebnih lastnosti niso štele kot en sam izdelek.
The Commission, therefore, in the process of this investigation, examined whether such footwear falls within the definition of product concerned or whether it merits a separate investigation.
Komisija je zato v postopku te preiskave proučila, ali je takšna obutev zajeta v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka ali zahteva ločeno preiskavo.
Firstly, there are indeed certain technical and physical differences between children's shoes and other types of shoes.
Prvič, dejansko obstajajo nekatere tehnične in fizične razlike med otroškimi čevlji in drugimi vrstami čevljev.
Because of their small size, the manufacturing process is considerably different; specific skills are required to produce smaller footwear which is appropriate to the special physical characteristics of children's feet, especially during the phase of muscular-skeletal development of the early years.
Zaradi njihove majhnosti je postopek proizvodnje precej drugačen; za proizvodnjo manjše obutve, prilagojene posebnim fizičnim značilnostim otroških stopal, zlasti med razvojem mišic in kosti v zgodnjih letih, so potrebne posebne spretnosti in znanja.
Secondly, children's shoes are often sold via different sales channels compared to other footwear, which also indicates that consumers may perceive children's shoes differently to other types of footwear.
Drugič, otroški čevlji se pogosto prodajajo prek drugih prodajnih poti kot ostala obutev, kar prav tako pomeni, da potrošniki otroško obutev morda dojemajo drugače kot druge vrste obutve.
More precisely, it is considered that, as a rule, consumers of children's shoes clearly made the distinction between footwear specifically designed for children and other types of footwear.
Šteje se, da potrošniki otroških čevljev praviloma jasno razlikujejo med obutvijo, posebej oblikovano za otroke, in drugimi vrstami obutve.
In addition, as compared to adult shoes, the market for children's shoes appears to be less driven by fashion trends or other similar considerations; the emphasis instead appears to be more on price and quality.
Poleg tega se zdi, da modne smernice ali drugi podobni pojavi v primerjavi s trgom čevljev za odrasle manj vplivajo na otroški trg; bolj sta pomembni cena in kakovost.