natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 provides that an additional levy is to be charged where the overall loss recorded in accordance with Article 15(1) and (2) of that Regulation is not fully covered by the proceeds from the basic production levy and the B levy.
Člen 16(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 določa, da se zaračuna dodatna dajatev, če prihodki iz proizvodnih dajatev in dajatev B ne pokrijejo ugotovljene skupne izgube skladno s členom 15(1) in (2) navedene uredbe.
For the 2004/05 marketing year, this uncovered overall loss amounts to EUR 133529997. The coefficient referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 should therefore be set.
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 je skupna nepokrita izguba znašala 133529997 EUR. Določiti je torej treba koeficient iz člena 16(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1687/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1687/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with regard to adapting certain fees
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2869/95 o pristojbinah, ki se plačujejo Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli), glede prilagoditve nekaterih pristojbin
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark [1], and in particular Article 139(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 z dne 20. decembra 1993 o znamki Skupnosti [1] in zlasti člena 139(3) Uredbe,
Article 139(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 lays down that the amounts of the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Office’) are to be fixed at such a level as to ensure that the revenue in respect thereof is sufficient to ensure its budget is balanced.
Člen 139(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 40/94 določa, da se zneski pristojbin, ki se plačujejo Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Urad“), določijo na višini, ki zagotavlja, da prihodki iz njih načeloma zadoščajo za uravnotežen proračun Urada.
A considerable increase in the Office’s revenue is expected in the medium term, as a result, in particular, of the payment of renewal fees for Community trade marks.
Srednjeročno se predvideva znatno povečanje prihodkov Urada zlasti zaradi plačila pristojbin za podaljšanje znamk Skupnosti.
The accession of the European Community to the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks approved by Council Decision 2003/793/EC [2] (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Madrid Protocol’) and the administration of the electronic registration procedure should simplify the said procedure and decrease its costs.
Pristop Evropske skupnosti k Protokolu k Madridskemu sporazumu o mednarodnem registriranju znamk, ki je bil odobren s Sklepom Sveta 2003/793/ES [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Madridski protokol“), kot tudi upravljanje postopka elektronske registracije bi morala poenostaviti postopek in zmanjšati njegove stroške.
The efficiency of the Office’s management should also reduce expenditure.
Učinkovitost upravljanja Urada tudi prispeva k zmanjševanju izdatkov.
A reduction in fees would therefore be an appropriate measure for ensuring that the budget is balanced as required, while fostering access to the system for users.
Posledično bi zmanjšanje pristojbin lahko predstavljalo ustrezen ukrep za zagotavljanje potrebnega proračunskega ravnotežja ob krepitvi dostopa uporabnikov do sistema.
Nonetheless, it should be pointed out that a slight surplus is always justified, as it makes it possible to deal with more or less unforeseeable situations as they arise, and to avoid undesirable deficits.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da je manjši presežek vedno utemeljen, saj dopušča soočenje z bolj ali manj nepredvidljivimi dogodki ter izogibanje neželenemu primanjkljaju.
It would therefore be justified to modify the fees by an overall total of approximately EUR 35 to 40 million per year.
Zato bi bilo utemeljeno spremeniti pristojbine do skupnega zneska zmanjšanja približno 35 do 40 milijonov EUR na leto.
This sum should be divided between the application and registration fees on the one hand, and the renewal fee on the other.
Ta znesek bi moral biti razdeljen med pristojbino za prijavo in registracijo na eni strani ter pristojbino za podaljšanje na drugi strani.
Moreover, a lower fee should be provided for if the application is made electronically.
Treba je tudi predvideti znižano pristojbino za elektronsko prijavo.
Fluctuations in the main indicators should be monitored regularly in order to ensure that revenue is balanced with expenditure.
Zaradi zagotavljanja ravnotežja med prihodki in izdatki se bo redno spremljal razvoj glavnih kazalcev.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Fees, Implementation Rules and the Procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs),
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora za pristojbine, izvedbene predpise ter postopke odborov za pritožbe Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) –
Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 2869/95 se spremeni:
The table in Article 2 shall be amended as follows:
Preglednica iz člena 2 se spremeni:
Point 1 shall be replaced by the following:
Točka 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Basic fee for the application for an individual mark [Article 26(2), Rule 4(a)]
Osnovna pristojbina za prijavo za posamezno znamko [člen 26(2), pravilo 4(a)]
The following point 1b shall be inserted:
Doda se naslednja točka 1b:
Basic fee for the application for an individual mark by electronic means [Article 26(2), Rule 4(a)]
Osnovna pristojbina za elektronsko prijavo za posamezno znamko [člen 26(2); pravilo 4(a)]
Points 2 to 4 are replaced by:
Točke od 2 do 4 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for an individual mark [Article 26(2), Rule 4(a)]
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za posamezno znamko [člen 26(2); pravilo 4(a)]
Basic fee for the application for a collective mark [Article 26(2) and Article 64(3), Rule 4(a) and Rule 42]
Osnovna pristojbina za prijavo za kolektivno znamko [člen 26(2) in člen 64(3); pravilo 4(a) in pravilo 42]
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for a collective mark [Article 26(2) and Article 64(3), Rule 4(b) and Rule 42]
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za kolektivno znamko [člen 26(2) in člen 64(3); pravilo 4(b) in pravilo 42]
Points 7 to 10 are replaced by:
Točke od 7 do 10 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Basic fee for the registration of an individual mark [Article 45, Rule 23(1)(a)]
Osnovna pristojbina za registracijo posamezne znamke [člen 45; pravilo 23(1)(a)]
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for an individual mark [Article 45, Rule 23(1)(b)]
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za posamezno znamko [člen 45; pravilo 23(1)(b)]
Basic fee for the registration of a collective mark [Article 45, Rule 23(1)(a)] and Rule 42]
Osnovna pristojbina za registracijo kolektivne znamke [člen 45; pravilo 23(1)(a) in pravilo 42]
Fee for each class of goods and services exceeding three for a collective mark [Article 45 and Article 64(3); Rule 23(1)(b) and Rule 42]
Pristojbina za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za kolektivno znamko [člen 45 in člen 64(3); pravilo 23(1)(b) in pravilo 42]
Points 12 to 15 are replaced by:
Točke od 12 do 15 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Basic fee for the renewal of an individual mark [Article 47(1), Rule 30(2)a)]
Osnovna pristojbina za podaljšanje za posamezno znamko [člen 47(1); pravilo 30(2)(a)]
Basic fee for the renewal for an individual mark by electronic means [Article 47(1), Rule 30(2)a)]
Osnovna pristojbina za podaljšanje za posamezno znamko s pomočjo elektronskih sredstev [člen 47(1); pravilo 30(2)(a)]
Fee for the renewal of each class of goods and services exceeding three for an individual mark [Article 47(1), Rule 30(2)(b)]
Pristojbina za podaljšanje za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za posamezno znamko [člen 47(1); pravilo 30(2)(b)]
Basic fee for the renewal of a collective mark [Article 47(1) and Article 64(3); Rule 30(2)(a) and Rule 42]
Osnovna pristojbina za podaljšanje za kolektivno znamko [člen 47(1) in člen 64(3); pravilo 30(2)(a) in pravilo 42]
Fee for the renewal of each class of goods and services exceeding three for a collective mark [Article 47(1) and Article 64(3); Rule 30(2)(b) and Rule 42]
Pristojbina za podaljšanje za vsak razred blaga in storitev, ki presega tri razrede, za kolektivno znamko [člen 47(1) in člen 64(3); pravilo 30(2)(b) in pravilo 42]
In Article 5(1), points (b) and (c) shall be deleted.
Točki (b) in (c) člena 5(1) se črtata.
In paragraph 1, points (b) and (c) are deleted.
Točki (b) in (c) odstavka 1 se črtata.
In paragraph 3, points (a)(i) and (a)(iii) are deleted.
Točki (a)(i) in (a)(iii) odstavka 3 se črtata.
In Article 11(3), points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
Točki (a) in (b) člena 11(3) se nadomestita z naslednjim:
for an individual mark: EUR 1450 plus, where applicable, EUR 300 for each class of goods or services exceeding three;
za posamezno znamko: 1450 EUR plus, kjer je to primerno, 300 EUR za vsak razred blaga ali storitev, ki presega tri;
for a collective mark as referred to in Rule 121(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95: EUR 2700 plus, where applicable, EUR 600 for each class of goods or services exceeding three.’
za kolektivno znamko iz pravila 121(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95: 2700 EUR plus, kjer je to primerno, 600 EUR za vsak razred blaga ali storitev, ki presega tri razrede.“
In Article 12(2), points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
Točki (a) in (b) člena 12(2) se nadomestita z naslednjim:
for an individual mark: EUR 1200 plus EUR 400 for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three;
za posamezno znamko: 1200 EUR plus 400 EUR za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri;
for a collective mark as referred to in Rule 121(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95: EUR 2700 plus EUR 800 for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three.’
za kolektivno znamko iz pravila 121(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95: 2700 EUR plus 800 EUR za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri razrede.“
In Article 13(1), points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following:
Točki (a) in (b) člena 13(1) se nadomestita z naslednjim:
for an individual mark: EUR 850 plus EUR 150 for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three;
za posamezno znamko: 850 EUR plus 150 EUR za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri razrede;
for a collective mark: EUR 1700 plus EUR 300 for each class of goods and services contained in the international registration exceeding three.’
za kolektivno znamko: 1700 EUR plus 300 EUR za vsak razred blaga in storitev v mednarodni registraciji, ki presega tri razrede.“
If the amounts of the fees described in articles 2, 11 and 12 change, the following transitional rules shall apply:
V primeru sprememb zneskov pristojbin, določenih v členih 2, 11 in 12, se uporablja naslednji prehodni sistem:
The amount of the application fee for Community trade marks, including, where applicable, fees for classes, shall be that which is laid down by the Regulation in force at the time that the application is filed in accordance with Article 25(1)(a) or (b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94.
Znesek pristojbine za prijavo znamke Skupnosti vključno s pristojbinami za razrede, kadar je to potrebno, je znesek, določen z uredbo, ki velja v trenutku sprejetja prijave na podlagi člena 25(1)(a) ali (b) Uredbe (ES) št. 40/94.
The amount of the registration fee for Community trade marks, including, where applicable, class fees, shall be that which is laid down by the Regulation in force at the time that the notification described in Rule 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 is sent.
Znesek pristojbine za registracijo znamke Skupnosti vključno s pristojbinami za razrede, kadar je to potrebno, je znesek, določen z uredbo, ki velja v trenutku odpošiljanja obvestila iz pravila 23(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2868/95.
The amount of the fee to be paid for submitting any other application or for initiating any other act shall be that which is laid down by the Regulation in force at the time of payment.
Znesek pristojbine za predložitev katere koli druge prijave ali začetek katerega koli drugega dejanja je znesek, določen z uredbo, ki velja v trenutku plačila.
The amount of the fees provided for in Articles 11 and 12 shall be fixed in accordance with the common regulations under the Madrid agreement concerning the international registration of marks and the Protocol relating to that agreement.
Znesek pristojbin, določenih v členih 11 in 12, je znesek, določen v skladu z izvršilnim predpisom, skupnim Madridskemu sporazumu o mednarodnem registriranju znamk in Protokolu k temu sporazumu.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 4221/2004 (OJ L 70, 9.3.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 422/2004 (UL L 70, 9.3.2004, str. 1).
OJ L 296, 14.11.2003, p. 20.
UL L 296, 14.11.2003, str. 20.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1042/2005 (OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 22).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1042/2005 (UL L 172, 5.7.2005, str. 22).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1688/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1688/2005
implementing Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards special guarantees concerning salmonella for consignments to Finland and Sweden of certain meat and eggs
o izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o posebnih jamstvih v zvezi s salmonelo za pošiljke nekaterih vrst mesa in jajc na Finsko in Švedsko
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin [1], and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o posebnih higienskih pravilih za živila živalskega izvora [1], in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
At the time of their accession, Finland and Sweden were granted additional salmonella guarantees covering trade in fresh meat from bovine and porcine animals, fresh poultrymeat and table eggs which were extended to minced meat by Council Directive 94/65/EC [2].
V času pristopa sta Finska in Švedska prejeli dodatna jamstva za salmonelo, ki zajemajo trgovino s svežim mesom goveda in prašičev, svežim perutninskim mesom in namiznimi jajci, kar je bilo razširjeno na mleto meso z Direktivo Sveta 94/65/ES [2].
Those guarantees were set out in certain Directives, as amended by the Act of Accession for Austria, Finland and Sweden, namely as regards food in Council Directive 64/433/EEC [3], in respect of fresh meat, Council Directive 71/118/EEC [4] in respect of fresh poultrymeat and Directive 92/118/EEC [5] in respect of eggs.
Navedena jamstva so bila določena v nekaterih direktivah, kakor so bile spremenjene z Aktom o pristopu Avstrije, Finske in Švedske, in sicer v zvezi z živili v Direktivi Sveta 64/433/EGS [3] glede svežega mesa, Direktivi Sveta 71/118/EGS [4] glede svežega perutninskega mesa in Direktivi 92/118/EGS [5] glede jajc.
As from 1 January 2006, Directives 64/433/EEC, 71/118/EEC, and 94/65/EC are to be repealed by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 repealing certain Directives concerning food hygiene and health conditions for the production and placing on the market of certain products of animal origin intended for human consumption and amending Council Directives 89/662/EEC and 92/118/EEC and Council Decision 95/408/EC [6].
Od 1. januarja 2006 se direktive 64/433/EGS, 71/118/EGS in 94/65/ES razveljavijo z Direktivo 2004/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o razveljavitvi nekaterih direktiv o higieni živil in zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in dajanje na trg nekaterih proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi, in o spremembi direktiv Sveta 89/662/EGS in 92/118/EGS in Odločbe Sveta 95/408/ES [6].
Directive 92/118/EEC is to be amended by Directive 2004/41/EC.
Direktivo 92/118/EGS je treba spremeniti z Direktivo 2004/41/ES.
Article 4 of Directive 2004/41/EC provides that pending the adoption of the necessary provisions on the basis of Regulations (EC) No 852/2004 [7], (EC) No 853/2004, (EC) No 854/2004 [8] of the European Parliament and of the Council or Council Directive 2002/99/EC [9], the implementing rules adopted on the basis of Directives 71/118/EEC and 94/65/EC and those adopted on the basis of Annex II to Directive 92/118/EEC, with the exception of Council Decision 94/371/EC [10] are to continue to apply mutatis mutandis.
Člen 4 Direktive 2004/41/ES določa, da je do sprejetja potrebnih določb na podlagi uredb Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 852/2004 [7], (ES) št. 853/2004, (ES) št. 854/2004 [8] ali Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES [9] treba smiselno nadaljevati z uporabo izvedbenih pravil, sprejetih na podlagi direktiv 71/118/EGS in 94/65/ES ter Priloge II k Direktivi 92/118/EGS, razen Odločbe Sveta 94/371/ES [10].
As from 1 January 2006, new rules concerning special guarantees for food in respect of salmonella will apply under Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
Od 1. januarja 2006 se bodo uporabljala nova pravila glede posebnih jamstev za živila v zvezi s salmonelo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 853/2004.
There is therefore a need to update and complement as appropriate the implementing provisions provided for in Commission Decision 95/168/EC of 8 May 1995 establishing, as regards salmonella, additional guarantees for consignments to Finland and Sweden of certain types of eggs intended for human consumption [11], Council Decision 95/409/EC of 22 June 1995 laying down the rules for the microbiological testing by sampling of fresh beef and veal and pigmeat intended for Finland and Sweden [12], Council Decision 95/411/EC of 22 June 1995 laying down the rules for the microbiological testing for salmonella by sampling of fresh poultry meat intended for Finland and Sweden [13], and Commission Decision 2003/470/EC of 24 June 2003 on the authorisation of certain alternative methods to be used in microbiological testing of meat intended for Finland and Sweden [14], pursuant to the new provisions of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
Zaradi tega je treba posodobiti in ustrezno dopolniti izvedbene določbe v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 95/168/ES z dne 8. maja 1995 o vzpostavitvi dodatnih jamstev v zvezi s salmonelo za pošiljke nekaterih vrst jajc, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi, na Finsko in Švedsko [11], Odločbo Sveta 95/409/ES z dne 22. junija 1995 o pravilih mikrobiološkega preskušanja z vzorčenjem svežega govejega, telečjega in prašičjega mesa, namenjenega na Finsko in Švedsko [12], Odločbo Sveta 95/411/ES z dne 22. junija 1995 o določitvi predpisov za mikrobiološko preskušanje na salmonelo z vzorčenjem svežega mesa perutnine, namenjenega na Finsko in Švedsko [13], in Odločbo Komisije 2003/470/ES z dne 24. junija 2003 o odobritvi določenih alternativnih metod za uporabo pri mikrobiološkem preskušanju mesa, namenjenega na Finsko in Švedsko [14], v skladu z novimi določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004.
It is furthermore appropriate to gather all the provisions in one Commission Regulation and to repeal Decisions 95/168/EC, 95/409/EC, 95/411/EC and 2003/470/EC.
Poleg tega je primerno zbrati vse določbe v eni Uredbi Komisije in razveljaviti odločbe 95/168/ES, 95/409/ES, 95/411/ES in 2003/470/ES.
Implementing provisions should also be adopted for the new special guarantees laid down in Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 as regard minced meat from poultry.
Sprejeti je treba izvedbene določbe za nova posebna jamstva iz Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 glede mletega mesa iz perutnine.
The rules relating to microbiological tests by sampling should be drawn up laying down the sampling method, the number of samples to be taken and the microbiological method to be used for examining the samples.
Predpise v zvezi z mikrobiološkimi preskusi z vzorčenjem je treba pripraviti z določitvijo metode vzorčenja, števila vzorcev, ki jih je treba odvzeti, in mikrobiološke metode, ki se uporablja za pregledovanje vzorcev.
In the rules on sampling methods, it is appropriate to make a distinction, as regards meat from bovine and porcine animals, between carcases and half carcases, on the one hand and quarters, cuts and smaller pieces on the other, and, as regards meat from poultry, between whole carcases, on the one hand, and parts of carcases and offal on the other.
V predpisih o metodah vzorčenja je pri govejem in prašičjem mesu primerno razlikovati med trupi in polovicami trupov na eni strani in četrtinami, odrezanimi kosi in manjšimi kosi na drugi strani, pri perutninskem mesu pa med celimi trupi na eni strani in deli trupov in drobovino na drugi.
It is appropriate to take account of international methods for the sampling and for the microbiological examination of samples, as reference methods, while allowing the use of certain alternative methods that have been validated and certified as providing equivalent guarantees.
Primerno je upoštevati mednarodne metode za vzorčenje in mikrobiološko pregledovanje vzorcev kot referenčne metode, pri čemer je treba dovoliti uporabo nekaterih alternativnih metod, ki so bile validirane in potrjene, da dajejo primerljive rezultate.
It is necessary to update or to establish where appropriate the models of trade and certification documents accompanying consignments and declaring or certifying that the guarantees are fulfilled.
Potrebno je posodobiti ali po potrebi oblikovati vzorce trgovinskih listin in potrdil, ki se priložijo pošiljkam in navajajo ali potrjujejo, da so jamstva izpolnjena.
Pursuant to Article 8(2)(c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, the special guarantees should not be applicable to any consignment that is subject to a programme recognised as equivalent to that implemented by Finland and Sweden, or to consignments of meat from bovine and porcine animals and eggs destined to special treatments.
V skladu s členom 8(2)(c) in (d) Uredbe (ES) št. 853/2004 se posebna jamstva ne smejo uporabljati za pošiljke, pri katerih se uporablja program, priznan za enakovrednega programu, ki ga izvajata Finska in Švedska, ali za pošiljke govejega in prašičjega mesa ter jajc, ki so namenjena za posebne obdelave.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee for the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali –
Sampling of meat from bovine animals
Vzorčenje govejega mesa
The sampling of meat from bovine animals, including minced meat but excluding meat preparations and mechanically separated meat, intended for Finland and Sweden, and subjected to a microbiological test shall be carried out in accordance with Annex I.
Vzorčenje govejega mesa, vključno z mletim mesom, vendar brez mesnih pripravkov in mehansko ločenega mesa, namenjenega na Finsko in Švedsko, ter na katerem se opravljajo mikrobiološki preskusi, se izvaja v skladu s Prilogo I.
Sampling of meat from porcine animals
Vzorčenje mesa prašičev
The sampling of meat from porcine animals, including minced meat but excluding meat preparations and mechanically separated meat, intended for Finland and Sweden and subjected to a microbiological test, shall be carried out in accordance with Annex I.
Vzorčenje prašičjega mesa, vključno z mletim mesom, vendar brez mesnih pripravkov in mehansko ločenega mesa, namenjenega na Finsko in Švedsko, ter na katerem se opravljajo mikrobiološki preskusi, se izvaja v skladu s Prilogo I.
Sampling of meat from poultry
Vzorčenje mesa perutnine