natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Karta pobytu (residence card, ‘KP’ series issued from 1 July 2001 to 30 April 2004 and ‘PL’ series issued as from 1 May 2004; valid up to 10 years, issued to aliens who have obtained a residence permit for a fixed period, a permit to settle, refugee status, a permit for tolerated stay; ‘PL’ series is also issued to aliens who have obtained a long-term residence permit)
Karta pobytu (izkaznica za prebivanje, serija „KP“, izdana od 1. julija 2001 do 30. aprila 2004, in serija „PL“, izdana od 1. maja 2004; veljavnost do deset let, izdana za tujca, ki je pridobil dovoljenje za prebivanje za določeno obdobje, dovoljenje za nastanitev, status begunca, dovoljenje za dopustitev bivanja; serijo „PL“ se izda tudi tujcu po pridobitvi dolgoročnega dovoljenja za bivanje)
Karta stałego pobytu (permit to settle, ‘XS’ series issued before 30 June 2001; valid for up to 10 years, issued to aliens who have obtained a permit to settle; the last card of this edition will expire on 29 June 2011)
Karta stałego pobytu (dovoljenje za naselitev, serija „XS“, izdana pred 30. junijem 2001; veljavna do deset let, izdana za tujca, ki je pridobil dovoljenje za naselitev; zadnja izkaznica te izdaje bo potekla 29. junija 2011)
Vizum za vstop (entry visa)
Vizum za vstop Vizum za vstop
Vizum za kratkoročno bivanje C (short-stay visa)
Vizum za kratkoročno bivanje C – Vizum za kratkoročno bivanje C
Vizum za daljše bivanje D (long-stay visa)
Vizum za daljše bivanje D – Vizum za daljše bivanje D
Dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje (permanent residence permit)
Dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje – Dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje
Dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje (temporary residence permit; validity of maximum one year unless otherwise stipulated by the Slovenian Aliens Act)
Dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje – Dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje (veljavnost največ eno leto, razen če slovenski zakon o tujcih določa drugače)
Diplomatska izkaznica (diplomatic identity card)
Diplomatska izkaznica – Diplomatska izkaznica
Konzularna izkaznica (consular identity card)
Konzularna izkaznica – Konzularna izkaznica
Konzularna izkaznica za častne konzularne funkcionarje (consular identity card for Honorary Consuls)
Konzularna izkaznica za častne konzularne funkcionarje – Konzularna izkaznica za častne konzularne funkcionarje
Službena izkaznica (official identity card)
Službena izkaznica
Krátkodobé vízum (short-stay visa)
Krátkodobé vízum (vizum za kratkoročno bivanje)
Dlhodobé vízum (long-stay visa)
Dlhodobé vízum (vizum za daljše bivanje)
Diplomatické vízum (diplomatic visa)
Diplomatické vízum (diplomatski vizum)
Osobitné vízum (special visa)
Osobitné vízum (posebni vizum)
Povolenie na prechodný pobyt (temporary residence permit)
Povolenie na prechodný pobyt (dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje)
Povolenie na trvalý pobyt (permanent residence permit)
Povolenie na trvalý pobyt (dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje)
Cestovné doklady — Travel documents
Cestovné doklady – Potne listine
Cudzinecký pas (alien's passport)
Cudzinecký pas (potni list za tujca)
Cestovný doklad podľa Dohovoru z 28. júla 1951 (travel document — Convention of 28 July 1951)
Cestovný doklad podľa Dohovoru z 28. julija 1951 (potne listine v skladu s Konvencijo z dne28. julija 1951)
Cestovný doklad podľa Dohovoru z 28. septembra 1954 (travel document — Convention of 28 September 1954)
Cestovný doklad podľa Dohovoru z 28. septembra 1954 (potne listine v skladu s Konvencijo z dne 28. septembra 1954)
Same type of document for all variants with the validity indicated on the sticker.
Enaka vrsta dokumenta za vse možnosti z veljavnostjo, označeno na nalepki.
of 26 May 2004
z den 26. maja 2004
relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty against The Topps Company Inc, Topps Europe Limited, Topps International Limited, Topps UK Limited and Topps Italia SRL
v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe ES proti The Topps Company Inc, Topps Europe Limited, Topps International Limited, Topps UK Limited in Topps Italia SRL
(Case No COMP/C-3/37.980 — Souris-Topps)
(Zadeva št. COMP/C-3/37.980 – Souris-Topps)
(notified under document number C(2004) 1910)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2004) 1910)
On 26 May 2004, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.
maja 2004 je Komisija sprejela odločbo v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Regulation No 1/2003, the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business interests.
V skladu z določbami člena 30 Uredbe 1/2003 Komisija objavlja imena strank in glavno vsebino odločbe, ob upoštevanju pravnega interesa podjetij do varovanja poslovnih interesov.
A non-confidential version of the full text of the decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the Commission's working languages at DG COMP's website at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html.
Različica celotnega besedila odločbe, ki ni zaupna, je na voljo v izvirnem jeziku zadeve in v delovnih jezikih Komisije na spletni strani GD COMP: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html.
SUMMARY OF THE INFRINGEMENT
I: POVZETEK KRŠITVE
Addressees, Nature and Duration of the Infringement
Naslovniki ter narava in trajanje kršitve
This Decision is addressed to The Topps Company Inc (hereinafter ‘Topps USA’), Topps Europe Ltd (hereinafter ‘Topps Europe’), Topps UK Ltd (hereinafter ‘Topps UK’), Topps International Ltd (hereinafter ‘Topps International’) and Topps Italia SRL (hereinafter ‘Topps Italia’) (together referred to as ‘Topps’).
Ta odločba je naslovljena na The Topps Company Inc (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Topps USA“), Topps Europe Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Topps Europe“), Topps UK Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Topps UK“), Topps International Ltd (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Topps International“) in Topps Italia SRL (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Topps Italia“) (v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj „Topps“).
The addressees infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty by participating with several of their intermediaries in the United Kingdom, Italy, Finland, Germany, France and Spain in a complex of agreements and concerted practices with the object of restricting parallel imports of Pokémon stickers, trading cards and other collectibles from 4 February 2000 until 29 November 2000.
Naslovniki so kršili člen 81(1) Pogodbe s sodelovanjem z več svojimi posredniki v Združenem kraljestvu, Italiji, na Finskem, v Nemčiji, Franciji in Španiji pri skupini sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj z namenom, da bi omejili vzporedni uvoz nalepk Pokémon, zbirateljskih kart in drugih zbirateljskih predmetov od 4. februarja 2000 do 29. novembra 2000.
The case originates from a complaint by La Souris Bleue, a French retailer for collectible products, alleging that Topps and its distributors had successfully prevented parallel imports of Pokémon stickers and albums from Spain into France.
Zadeva se je začela s pritožbo družbe La Souris Bleue, francoskega trgovca na drobno z zbirateljskimi izdelki, ki je trdila, da so Topps in njegovi distributerji uspešno preprečili vzporeden uvoz nalepk in albumov Pokémon iz Španije v Francijo.
Products Concerned and Behaviour of Topps
Zadevni izdelki in vedenje družb Topps
The Decision concerns Pokémon collectibles.
Odločba zadeva zbirateljske predmete Pokémon.
Collectibles are items like stickers, trading cards or removable tattoos popular with young children which follow certain themes (e.g. members of sports teams or characters of cartoon series).
Zbirateljski predmeti so predmeti kot nalepke, zbirateljske karte ali začasne tetovaže, priljubljeni pri majhnih otrocih in ki obravnavajo določene teme (npr. člane športnih društev ali like iz risanih serij).
Pokémon is the name for a whole range of characters originally developed for the Nintendo ‘Game Boy’ videogame but also used, under a licence, by Topps to illustrate collectible products.
Pokémon je naziv za celo vrsto likov, ki so bili prvotno razviti za videoigro za Nintendo „Game Boy“, na podlagi licence pa jih je uporabil tudi Topps za upodobitev na zbirateljskih izdelkih.
In 2000, there was a significant demand for such Pokémon collectibles.
Leta 2000 je bilo povpraševanje po takih zbirateljskih predmetih Pokémon zelo veliko.
The definition of the relevant market can be left open since this case concerns a restriction of competition by object.
Opredelitev upoštevnega trga lahko ostane odprta, saj se ta zadeva nanaša na namen omejevanja konkurence.
The Decision identifies the existence of agreements and concerted practices between Topps and seven of its European intermediaries with the overall objective of restricting parallel imports of Pokémon collectibles between Member States.
V Odločbi je ugotovljeno, da obstajajo sporazumi in usklajena ravnanja med Topps in sedmimi od njegovih evropskih posrednikov s splošnim ciljem omejevanja vzporednega uvoza zbirateljskih predmetov Pokémon med državami članicami.
Topps and its intermediaries pursued this objective with the following instruments and mechanisms:
Topps in njegovi posredniki so si prizadevali za ta cilj z naslednjimi instrumenti in mehanizmi:
Topps actively collected information so that it learned of instances of parallel trade from its intermediaries;
Topps je dejavno zbiral podatke, tako da je od svojih posrednikov izvedel za primere vzporedne trgovine ;
Topps monitored the final destination of Pokémon products;
Topps je spremljal končno destinacijo izdelkov Pokémon;
when Topps knew from its intermediaries about instances of parallel trade, it asked them for help in order to trace back parallel imports to their source;
ko je Topps od svojih posrednikov izvedel za primere vzporedne trgovine, jih je prosil za pomoč, da bi izsledil vir vzporednega uvoza;
Topps also involved its intermediaries by requesting and receiving assurances that stock would not be re-exported to other Member States;
Topps je prav tako vpletel svoje posrednike, saj jih je prosil za zagotovila in jih tudi dobil, da zaloge ne bodo ponovno izvožene v druge države članice;
in some cases where Topps had the impression that its intermediaries did not cooperate, it threatened to cut the supply.
v nekaterih primerih, ko je Topps dobil vtis, da njegovi posredniki ne sodelujejo, jim je grozil, da bo ustavil dobavo.
Topps acknowledged that it ‘engaged in activities that have had the effect of impeding cross-border trade within the EU’ and that ‘a complete ban on exports and extensive territorial protection for its distributors in the circumstances described above is difficult to reconcile with Article 81’.
Topps je priznal, da je „izvajal dejavnosti, ki so imele za posledico preprečevanje čezmejne trgovine znotraj EU“ in da „je popolno prepoved izvoza in obsežno ozemeljsko zaščito za njegove distributerje v zgoraj opisanih okoliščinah težko uskladiti s členom 81“.
The agreements and concerted practices between Topps and its distributors or agents are restrictive by object.
Sporazumi in usklajena ravnanja med Topps in njegovimi distributerji ali zastopniki so po namenu omejevalni.
They aim at preventing intermediaries from exporting, both actively and passively, Pokémon products outside their respective contractual territories.
Njihov cilj je preprečiti posrednikom, da bi izvažali, tako aktivno kot pasivno, izdelke Pokémon zunaj svojih pogodbenih ozemelj.
As the object of the agreements and concerted practices in this case is to restrict competition, it is not necessary to consider their actual effects on competition.
Ker je namen sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj v tej zadevi omejiti konkurenco, ni treba upoštevati njihovega dejanskega vpliva na konkurenco.
Notwithstanding this, the evidence on the Commission file shows that parallel imports were, in fact, prevented.
Ne glede na to dokazi iz dokumentacije Komisije kažejo, da je bil vzporeden uvoz dejansko preprečen.
The block exemption regulations No 1983/83 (applicable until 31 May 2000) and No 2790/1999 did not apply since the restrictions aimed at guaranteeing absolute territorial protection, thereby covering both active and passive sales.
Uredbi o skupinski izjemi št. 1983/83 (ki se je uporabljala do 31. maja 2000) in št. 2790/1999 se nista mogli uporabiti, saj je bil cilj omejitev zagotavljanje popolne ozemeljske zaščite, ki so na ta način zajemale tako aktivno kot pasivno prodajo.
Nor could the agreements benefit from an individual exemption under Article 81(3) of the Treaty since they did not result in any improvement of the distribution of these products and were detrimental to consumers.
Prav tako sporazumi niso mogli biti upravičeni do posamične izjeme na podlagi člena 81(3) Pogodbe, saj niso privedli do nobenega izboljšanja distribucije teh izdelkov in so bili na škodo potrošnikov.
The Decision is addressed to all European Topps subsidiaries which participated in the anti-competitive agreements and concerted practices, and the ultimate US parent company which are held jointly and severally liable for the infringement.
Odločba je naslovljena na vse evropske hčerinske družbe družbe Topps, ki so sodelovale v protikonkurenčnih sporazumih in usklajenih ravnanjih, ter na končno matično družbo v ZDA, ki so skupaj solidarno odgovorne za kršitev.
The latter is held liable because it was in a position to decisively influence the conduct of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Matična družba v ZDA je odgovorna tudi, ker je imela možnost, da odločilno vpliva na vedenje hčerinskih družb, ki so v njeni popolni lasti.
The Commission legally presumes, on the basis of the case law of the Court, that this power to influence was actually exercised.
Komisija na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča pravno domneva, da je to moč vplivanja tudi dejansko uporabila.
Topps did not succeed in rebutting this legal presumption which was, on the contrary, confirmed by the parallel involvement of all European subsidiaries and by the dual position of one Topps employee as both Managing Director of the Irish subsidiary and Vice President (International) of the US parent company.
Topps ni uspel ovreči te pravne domneve, ravno nasprotno, potrdila sta ga istočasna vpletenost vseh evropskih hčerinskih družb in dvojni položaj enega zaposlenega v Topps, ki je bil hkrati generalni direktor irske hčerinske družbe in (mednarodni) podpredsednik matične družbe v ZDA.
The decision is not addressed to Topps' intermediaries because their responsibility for the infringement was less significant.
Odločba ni naslovljena na posrednike za Topps, saj je bila njihova odgovornost pri kršitvi manj pomembna.
FINE
II: GLOBA
Basic Amount
Osnovni znesek
In its assessment of gravity, the Commission considers that infringements with the objective of preventing parallel imports between Member States are by their nature very serious violations of Article 81(1) of the Treaty.
Pri svoji oceni teže kršitve Komisija meni, da so kršitve, katerih cilj je preprečevanje vzporednega uvoza med državami članicami, po svoji naravi zelo hude kršitve člena 81(1) Pogodbe.
Such infringements have the objective of artificially partitioning the single market and, thereby, jeopardise a fundamental principle of the Treaty.
Cilj takšnih kršitev je umetna delitev enotnega trga in s tem te kršitve ogrožajo enega temeljnih načel Pogodbe.
As regards the actual impact of the infringement, the Commission takes into account that it has no evidence showing that the restrictions of parallel imports were applied systematically to all intermediaries or products.
Kar zadeva dejanski vpliv kršitve, Komisija upošteva, da ne obstajajo dokazi, ki bi kazali, da so se omejitve vzporednega uvoza uporabljale načrtno za vse posrednike ali izdelke.
Some of the agreements or concerted practices appear not to have been implemented in full and may have had a limited effect in terms of value of the goods concerned.
Zdi se, da se nekateri sporazumi ali usklajena ravnanja niso v celoti izvajali in so imeli omejen vpliv v smislu vrednosti zadevnega blaga.
The Commission has no evidence of substantial effects of the restrictions on the market.
Komisija nima dokazov o znatnem vplivu omejitev na trg.
Concerning the size of the relevant market, the agreements or concerted practices identified in this Decision concerned seven national markets but the restrictive effects were mainly felt in only three importing Member States.
Glede velikosti upoštevnega trga so se sporazumi ali usklajena ravnanja, opredeljeni v tej odločbi, nanašali na sedem nacionalnih trgov, vendar so omejevalni vpliv občutili v glavnem samo v treh državah članicah uvoznicah.
Consequently, the infringement committed by Topps is considered serious.
Zato se kršitev, ki jo je storil Topps, šteje za hudo.
Aggravating and Attenuating Circumstances
Obteževalne in olajševalne okoliščine
The Commission does not take into account aggravating circumstances in this case.
Komisija v tej zadevi ne upošteva obteževalnih okoliščin.
As regards attenuating circumstances, the Commission takes into account that Topps terminated the infringement after the first Commission intervention.
Kar zadeva olajševalne okoliščine, Komisija upošteva, da je Topps odpravil kršitev po prvem posredovanju Komisije.
In view of this, the basic amount of the fine is reduced by 20 % (EUR 530000).
Glede na to se osnovni znesek globe zmanjša za 20 % (530000 EUR).
The Commission also considers that Topps has cooperated effectively with the Commission during the proceedings.
Komisija prav tako meni, da je Topps med postopkom učinkovito sodeloval s Komisijo.
Topps went beyond what was legally necessary to comply with the obligations under Article 11 of Regulation No 17, does not contest the facts upon which the infringement is based and contributed significantly to establishing the infringement.
Topps je naredil več, kot je bilo zakonsko potrebno za izpolnitev obveznosti iz člena 11 Uredbe št. 17, ne izpodbija dejstev, na katerih temelji kršitev, in je znatno prispeval k ugotavljanju kršitve.
Therefore, the basic amount of the fine is reduced by an additional 20 % (EUR 530000).
Zato se osnovni znesek globe zmanjša za dodatnih 20 % (530000 EUR).
The Final Amount Imposed
Končni naloženi znesek
In view of the above, the final amount of the fine imposed on Topps is EUR 1590000.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je končni znesek naložene globe za Topps 1590000 EUR.
OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.
UL L 1, 4.1.2003, str. 1 Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 411/2004 (UL L 68, 6.3.2004, str. 1).
In the light of this, the Decision considers EUR 2650000 an appropriate amount to take as a basis for calculating the fine.
Ob upoštevanju tega se v Odločbi meni, da je 2650000 EUR primeren znesek kot osnova za izračun globe.
As the infringement is of short duration (from 4 February 2000 until 29 November 2000), the basic amount of the fine is not increased.
Ker je bila kršitev kratkotrajna (od 4. februarja 2000 do 29. novembra 2000), se osnovni znesek globe ne poveča.
Decision No 896/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Odločba št. 896/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory
o vzpostavitvi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja določenih dovoljenj za prebivanje, ki jih izdata Švica in Lihtenštajn, s strani držav članic za namen tranzita preko njihovih ozemelj
Pursuant to Article 21 of the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders [2] (hereinafter referred to as the Schengen Convention) residence permits issued by Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis are to be mutually recognised as equivalent to the uniform visa.
V skladu s členom 21 Konvencije z dne 19. junija 1990 o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Schengenska konvencija“) se dovoljenja za prebivanje, ki so jih izdale države članice, ki polno izvajajo schengenski pravni red, vzajemno priznajo kot enakovredna enotnemu vizumu.
The current Community rules do not, however, provide for a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders whereby the residence permits issued by third countries would be recognised as equivalent to the uniform visa for the purpose of transit through, or a short stay in, the common area.
Sedanja pravila Skupnosti ne predvidevajo poenostavljenega režima za kontrolo oseb na zunanjih mejah, pri čemer bi bila dovoljenja za prebivanje, izdana s strani tretjih držav, priznana kot enakovredna enotnemu vizumu za namen tranzita preko skupnega območja ali za namen kratkoročnega bivanja na skupnem območju.
Third-country nationals who hold a resident permit issued by Switzerland and who are subject to a visa obligation under Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those who are nationals are exempt from that requirement [3] must apply for a visa when they transit the common area on return to their country of origin.
Državljani tretjih držav, ki so imetniki dovoljenja za prebivanje, izdanega v Švici, in ki morajo imeti vizum v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 539/2001 z dne 15. marca 2001 o tretjih državah, katerih državljani morajo imeti ob prehodu zunanjih meja vizum, in tretjih državah, katerih državljani so izvzeti iz vizumske obveznosti [3], morajo zaprositi za vizum, kadar so v tranzitu preko skupnega območja na poti nazaj v svojo državo izvora.
As a result, the consular offices of the Member States in Switzerland have to deal with large numbers of visa applications submitted by such third-country nationals.
Konzularna predstavništva držav članic v Švici morajo posledično reševati veliko število prošenj za vizume, ki jih predložijo ti državljani tretjih držav.
Similar difficulties have occurred as regards applications for visas by holders of residence permits issued by Liechtenstein.
Podobne težave so se pojavile tudi glede prošenj za vizume, ki jih predložijo imetniki dovoljenj za prebivanje, izdanih v Lihtenštajnu.
As a result of the two-step implementation of the Schengen acquis, new Member States that acceded to the European Union on 1 May 2004 are required, from that date, to issue national visas to third-country nationals who hold a residence permit issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein and who are subject to a visa obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 539/2001.
Na podlagi dvostopenjskega izvajanja schengenskega pravnega reda morajo nove države članice, ki so pristopile k Evropski uniji 1. maja 2004, od tega dne državljanom tretjih držav, ki sta jim Švica ali Lihtenštajn izdala dovoljenje za prebivanje in morajo imeti vizum na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001, izdati nacionalne vizume.
Some of the new Member States have voiced concerns as to the additional administrative burden this will place on their consulates in Switzerland and Liechtenstein.
Nekatere nove države članice so izrazile skrbi zaradi dodatne upravne obremenitve, ki jo bo to povzročilo za njihove konzulate v Švici in Lihtenštajnu.
It does not appear necessary for Member States to require this category of persons to hold a visa, as they represent a low risk of illegal immigration for the Member States.
Ne zdi se nujno potrebno, da bi države članice od te skupine oseb zahtevale vizum, saj za njih predstavljajo nizko tveganje za nezakonito priseljevanje.