natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The target levels will be set by the end of the year 2008.
Ciljne vrednosti bodo določene do konca leta 2008.
Muscle meat of fish and fishery products as defined in categories (a), (b), (c), (e) and (f) of the list in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 (OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.
Meso mišic rib in ribiški proizvodi, kot so opredeljeni v kategorijah (a), (b), (c), (e) in (f) na seznamu v členu 1 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 (UL L 17, 21.1.2000, str. 22.
Regulation as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003).
The action level applies to crustaceans excluding the brown meat of crab and excluding head and thorax meat of lobster and similar large crustaceans (Nephropidae and Palinuridae) and to cephalopods without viscera.
Prag za ukrepanje se uporablja za rake, razen rjavega mesa rakov ter mesa glave in prsi jastoga in podobnih velikih rakov (Nephropidae in Palinuridae), ter za glavonožce brez drobovine.
Where fish are intended to be eaten whole, the action level shall apply to the whole fish.
Če se ribe uživajo cele, velja prag za ukrepanje za celo ribo.
When the action level is exceeded, it will be in some cases not necessary to perform an investigation as regards the source of contamination as the background level in some areas for some fish species is close to or exceeding the action level.
Če je prag za ukrepanje presežen, v nekaterih primerih ni treba izvesti preiskave v zvezi z virom kontaminacije, ker so na nekaterih področjih ravni za nekatere vrste rib blizu praga za ukrepanje ali ga presegajo.
However it is appropriate in these cases where the action level is exceeded to record all information such as sampling period, geographic origin and fish species in view of future measures as regards the presence of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds in fish and fishery products.
Vseeno je primerno, da se, če je prag za ukrepanje presežen, zapišejo vse informacije, kot so čas vzorčenja, geografsko poreklo, vrste rib …, glede na prihodnje ukrepe v zvezi s prisotnostjo dioksinov in dioksinom podobnih spojin v ribah in ribiških proizvodih.
Milk (raw milk, milk for the manufacture of milk-based products and heat treated milk) as defined in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
Mleko (surovo mleko, mleko za izdelavo proizvodov na osnovi mleka in toplotno obdelano mleko, kot je opredeljeno v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004).
Hen eggs and egg products as defined in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004.
Kokošja jajca in jajčni proizvodi, kot so opredeljeni v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 853/2004.
The term of office of Mr Otmar ISSING expires on 31 May 2006.
Mandat g. Otmarja ISSINGA se izteče 31. maja 2006.
Mr Jürgen STARK be appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 June 2006.
da se g. Jürgen STARK imenuje za člana Izvršilnega odbora Evropske centralne banke za dobo osmih let z veljavnostjo od 1. junija 2006.
on further European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education
o nadaljnjem evropskem sodelovanju pri zagotavljanju kakovosti v visokem šolstvu
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE –
Although the implementation of Council Recommendation 98/561/ΕC of 24 September 1998 on European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education has been a marked success as demonstrated in the report of the Commission of 30 September 2004, there is still a need to improve the performance of European higher education, particularly as regards quality, in order for it to become more transparent and trustworthy for European citizens and for students and scholars from other continents.
Čeprav je bilo izvajanje Priporočila Sveta 98/561/ES z dne 24. septembra 1998 o evropskem sodelovanju pri zagotavljanju kakovosti v visokem šolstvu zelo uspešno, kar je razvidno iz poročila Komisije z dne 30. septembra 2004, pa še vedno obstaja potreba po izboljšanju delovanja evropskega visokega šolstva, zlasti glede kakovosti, da bi to postalo preglednejše in bolj zanesljivo za evropske državljane ter študente in visokošolske delavce z drugih celin.
Recommendation 98/561/EC called for support to and, where necessary, the establishment of transparent quality assurance systems.
Priporočilo 98/561/ES je pozvalo k podpori in, kjer je to potrebno, vzpostavitvi preglednega sistema zagotavljanja kakovosti.
Almost all Member States have set up national assurance systems and have initiated or enabled the establishment of one or more quality assurance or accreditation agencies.
Skoraj vse države članice so vzpostavile nacionalne sisteme zagotavljanja kakovosti in začele ali omogočile ustanovitev ene ali več agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo.
Recommendation 98/561/EC called for quality assurance systems to be based on a series of essential features, including evaluation of programmes or institutions through internal assessment, external review, and involving the participation of students, publication of results and international participation.
Priporočilo 98/561/ES je pozvalo k upoštevanju nekaterih bistvenih izhodišč za vzpostavitev sistema zagotavljanja kakovosti, kar vključuje ocenjevanje programov ali zavodov prek notranjega ocenjevanja, zunanjih pregledov, sodelovanja študentov, objave rezultatov in mednarodne udeležbe.
The results of quality assurance assessments play a significant role in helping higher education institutions to improve performance.
Rezultati ocenjevanja zagotavljanja kakovosti igrajo pomembno vlogo pri izboljšanju delovanja visokošolskih zavodov.
The essential features referred to in recital 3 have generally been implemented in all quality assurance systems and they have been affirmed by the European Ministers of Education, in Berlin, in September 2003, in the context of the Bologna Process, working towards the realisation of a European Higher Education Area.
Bistvena izhodišča iz uvodne izjave 3 so bila v glavnem upoštevana pri vseh sistemih zagotavljanja kakovosti, v okviru bolonjskega procesa pa so jih potrdili tudi evropski ministri za šolstvo, ki so se septembra 2003 zbrali v Berlinu z namenom vzpostavitve evropskega visokošolskega prostora.
The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA) was established in 2000 and has a growing membership of quality assurance or accreditation agencies in all Member States.
Evropsko združenje za zagotavljanje kakovosti v visokem šolstvu (ENQA) je bila ustanovljena leta 2000 in njeno članstvo se stalno povečuje z agencijami za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo iz vseh držav članic.
In the context of the Bologna Process, Ministers of Education from 45 countries adopted the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area, as proposed by ENQA, during their meeting in Bergen on 19 and 20 May 2005 and as a follow-up to the meeting in Berlin in September 2003.
V okviru bolonjskega procesa so ministri za šolstvo iz 45 držav na svojem srečanju 19. in 20. maja 2005 v Bergnu, ki je sledilo srečanju v Berlinu septembra 2003, sprejeli standarde in smernice za zagotavljanje kakovosti evropskega visokega šolstva, ki jih je predlagalo ENQA.
They also welcomed the principle of a European register of quality assurance agencies based on national review and asked that the practicalities of implementation be further developed by ENQA, in cooperation with the European University Association (EUA), the European Association for Institutions of Higher Education (EURASHE) and the National Unions of Students in Europe (ESIB), with a report back to Ministers through the Bologna Follow-up Group.
Pozdravili so tudi načelo Evropskega registra agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki bi temeljil na nacionalnem pregledu, in pozvali ENQA naj v sodelovanju z Evropskim združenjem univerz (EUA), Evropskim združenjem visokošolskih zavodov (EURASHE) in z Nacionalnimi zvezami evropskih študentov (ESIB) nadalje razvije praktične vidike v zvezi z njegovim izvajanjem in o tem poroča ministrom prek Skupine za spremljanje bolonjskega procesa.
They furthermore underlined the importance of cooperation between nationally recognised agencies with a view to enhancing the mutual recognition of accreditation or quality assurance decisions.
Ob tem so poudarili pomen sodelovanja med nacionalno priznanimi agencijami za izboljšanje vzajemnega priznavanja odločitev o akreditaciji ali o zagotavljanju kakovosti.
EU action supporting quality assurance should be developed in coherence with activities carried out in the context of the Bologna Process.
Dejavnosti EU za podpiranje zagotavljanja kakovosti bi bilo treba razvijati skladno z dejavnostmi, ki se izvajajo v okviru bolonjskega procesa.
It is desirable to draw up a register of independent and trustworthy quality assurance agencies operating in Europe, be they regional or national, general or specialised, public or private, to support transparency in higher education and help the recognition of qualifications and periods of study abroad.
Zaželeno bi bilo sestaviti register neodvisnih in zanesljivih agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti, ki delujejo v Evropi, ne glede na to, ali gre za regionalne ali nacionalne, splošne ali specializirane, javne ali privatne, kar bi povečalo preglednost v visokem šolstvu in pripomoglo k priznavanju kvalifikacij in obdobij študija v tujini.
In the context of the Lisbon Strategy, the European Council in Barcelona, in March 2002, expressed their conclusion that European education and training systems should become a ‘world quality reference’,
Evropski svet je v okviru lizbonske strategije marca leta 2002 v Barceloni postavil cilj, v skladu s katerim bi morali evropski sistemi izobraževanja in usposabljanja postati „svetovna referenca kakovosti“ –
HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT MEMBER STATES:
PRIPOROČATA DRŽAVAM ČLANICAM:
encourage all higher education institutions active within their territory to introduce or develop rigorous internal quality assurance systems, in accordance with the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European Higher Education Area adopted in Bergen in the context of the Bologna Process;
da v skladu s standardi in smernicami za zagotavljanje kakovosti evropskega visokega šolstva, sprejetimi v Bergnu v okviru bolonjskega procesa, spodbujajo vse visokošolske zavode na svojem ozemlju k uvedbi ali razvoju strogih notranjih sistemov zagotavljanja kakovosti;
encourage all quality assurance or accreditation agencies active within their territory to be independent in their assessments, to apply the features of quality assurance laid down in Recommendation 98/561/EC and to apply the common set of general standards and guidelines adopted in Bergen, for assessment purposes.
da spodbujajo vse agencije za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo na svojem ozemlju k neodvisnosti pri ocenjevanju, upoštevanju izhodišč za zagotavljanje kakovosti iz Priporočila 98/561/ES in uporabi skupnega niza splošnih standardov in smernic za ocenjevanje, sprejetih v Bergnu.
These standards should be further developed in cooperation with representatives of the higher education sector.
Te standarde je treba nadalje razvijati v sodelovanju s predstavniki visokega šolstva.
They should be applied in such a way as to protect and promote diversity and innovation;
Uporabljati jih je treba tako, da varujejo in spodbujajo raznolikost ter inovativnost;
encourage representatives of national authorities, the higher education sector and quality assurance and accreditation agencies, together with social partners, to set up a ‘European Register of Quality Assurance Agencies’ (European Register) based on national review, that takes account of the principles set out in the Annex, and to define the conditions for registration and the rules for management of the register;
da predstavnike nacionalnih organov, predstavnike visokega šolstva in agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo spodbujajo, naj skupaj s socialnimi partnerji vzpostavijo „Evropski register agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Evropski register“), ki bo temeljil na nacionalnem pregledu in bo upošteval načela, določena v Prilogi, ter opredelijo pogoje za registracijo ter pravila za vodenje registra;
enable higher education institutions active within their territory to choose among quality assurance or accreditation agencies in the European Register an agency which meets their needs and profile, provided that this is compatible with their national legislation or permitted by their national authorities;
da omogočijo vsem visokošolskim zavodom na svojem ozemlju, da med agencijami za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo iz Evropskega registra same izberejo tisto, ki ustreza njihovim potrebam in profilu, pod pogojem, da je to v skladu z njihovo nacionalno zakonodajo ali da to dopuščajo njihovi nacionalni organi;
allow higher education institutions to work towards a complementary assessment by another agency in the European Register, for example to enhance their international reputation;
da omogočijo visokošolskim zavodom, da si prizadevajo za dopolnilno ocenjevanje s strani druge agencije iz Evropskega registra, na primer za okrepitev svojega mednarodnega ugleda;
promote cooperation between agencies in order to build up mutual trust and the recognition of quality assurance and accreditation assessments, thus contributing to the recognition of qualifications for the purpose of study or work in another country;
da spodbujajo sodelovanje med agencijami z namenom vzpostavitve vzajemnega zaupanja in priznavanja ocen zagotavljanja kakovosti in akreditacij ter s tem prispevajo k priznavanju kvalifikacij za namene študija ali dela v drugi državi;
ensure public access to the assessments made by the quality assurance or accreditation agencies listed in the European Register,
da zagotovijo javni dostop do ocen agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti ali akreditacijo, ki so navedene v Evropskem registru.
INVITE THE COMMISSION:
POZIVATA KOMISIJO:
to continue, in close cooperation with the Member States, its support for cooperation between higher education institutions, quality assurance and accreditation agencies, competent authorities and other bodies active in the field;
da v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami še naprej podpira sodelovanje med visokošolskimi zavodi, agencijami za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo, pristojnimi organi in drugimi organi, dejavnimi na tem področju;
to present triennial reports to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on progress in the development of quality assurance systems in the various Member States and on cooperation activities at European level, including the progress achieved with respect to the objectives referred to above.
da Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij predstavi triletna poročila o napredku pri razvoju sistemov zagotavljanja kakovosti v različnih državah članicah in o sodelovanju na evropski ravni, vključno z napredkom, doseženim glede na zgoraj navedene cilje.
Done at Strasbourg, 15 February 2006.
V Strasbourgu, 15. februarja 2006
OJ C 255, 14.10.2005, p. 72.
UL C 255, 14.10.2005, str. 72.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 13 October 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 30 January 2006.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. oktobra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 30. januarja 2006.
ΟJ L 270, 7.10.1998, p. 56.
UL L 270, 7.10.1998, str. 56.
‘European Register of Quality Assurance Agencies’
„Evropski register agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti“
The Register should provide a list of reliable agencies whose assessments Member States (and public authorities within Member States) can trust.
Register bi moral vsebovati seznam zanesljivih agencij, katerih ocenam lahko države članice (in javni organi znotraj držav članic) zaupajo.
It should be founded on the following main principles.
Temeljiti bi moral na naslednjih glavnih načelih:
The list of agencies should be drawn up by representatives of national authorities, the higher education sector (higher education institutions, students, teachers and researchers) and quality assurance and accreditation agencies active in the Member States, together with social partners.
seznam agencij bi morali sestaviti predstavniki nacionalnih organov, predstavniki visokega šolstva (visokošolski zavodi, študenti, učitelji in raziskovalci) in predstavniki agencij za zagotavljanje kakovosti in akreditacijo, ki so dejavne v državah članicah, skupaj s socialnimi partnerji;
Conditions for registration of agencies could include, inter alia:
pogoji za registracijo agencij bi morali med drugim vključevati:
a commitment to complete independence in reaching their judgement;
zavezo popolne neodvisnosti pri oblikovanju svojih ocen;
recognition by at least the Member State within which they operate (or by public authorities within that Member State);
priznanje s strani vsaj tiste države članice, v kateri delujejo (ali javnih organov znotraj te države članice);
operation on the basis of the common set of standards and guidelines referred to in recommendations 1 and 2 addressed to the Member State;
delovanje na podlagi skupnega niza standardov in smernic iz priporočil 1 in 2, naslovljenih na države članice;
regular external review by peers and other experts, including publication of the criteria, methodologies and results of such review.
redne zunanje preglede s strani kolegov ali drugih strokovnjakov, vključno z objavo meril, metodologije in rezultatov takšnih pregledov.
In the event of an initial refusal of registration, re-evaluation is possible on the basis of improvements made.
V primeru začetne zavrnitve registracije je ponovna ocena možna na podlagi doseženih izboljšav.
concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) for the financial year 2004
o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji za izvajanje dejavnosti Evropskega razvojnega sklada (šesti ERS) za proračunsko leto 2004
Having regard to the Third ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 8 December 1984,
ob upoštevanju Tretje konvencije AKP–EGS, podpisane 8. decembra 1984 v Lomeju,
Having regard to Internal Agreement 86/126/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid [1], and in particular Article 29(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Notranjega sporazuma 86/126/EGS o financiranju in upravljanju pomoči Skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 29(3) Notranjega sporazuma,
Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 11 November 1986 applicable to the Sixth European Development Fund (Sixth EDF) [2], and in particular Articles 66 to 73 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Finančne uredbe z dne 11. novembra 1986, ki se uporablja za šesti Evropski razvojni sklad (šesti ERS) [2], in zlasti členov 66 do 73 Finančne uredbe,
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the Sixth EDF as at 31 December 2004 and the Court of Auditors' report concerning the financial year 2004 together with the Commission's replies [3],
po preučitvi izkaza prihodkov in odhodkov in bilance stanja v zvezi z dejavnostmi šestega ERS na dan 31. decembra 2004 ter poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2004, skupaj z odgovori Komisije [3],
Whereas pursuant to Article 29(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Sixth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council;
ker Evropski parlament na priporočilo Sveta podeli Komisiji razrešnico za finančno upravljanje šestega ERS v skladu s členom 29(3) omenjenega notranjega sporazuma,
Whereas the overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Sixth EDF during the financial year 2004 has been satisfactory,
ker je Komisija dejavnosti šestega ERS v proračunskem letu 2004 na splošno zadovoljivo izvajala –
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Sixth EDF for the financial year 2004.
PRIPOROČA, da Evropski parlament Komisiji podeli razrešnico za izvajanje dejavnosti šestega ERS za proračunsko leto 2004.
Agreement as last amended by Council Decision 86/281/EEC (OJ L 178, 2.7.1986, p. 13).
Sporazum, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 86/281/EGS (UL L 178, 2.7.1986, str. 13).
concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) for the financial year 2004
o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji za izvajanje dejavnosti Evropskega razvojnega sklada (sedmi ERS) za proračunsko leto 2004
Having regard to the Fourth ACP-EC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989, as amended by the Agreement signed at Mauritius on 4 November 1995,
ob upoštevanju Četrte konvencije AKP–ES, podpisane 15. decembra 1989 v Lomeju, kakor je bila spremenjena s Sporazumom, podpisanim 4. novembra 1995 na Mauritiusu,
Having regard to Internal Agreement 91/401/EEC on the financing and administration of Community aid under the Fourth ACP-EC Convention [1], setting up, amongst others, the Seventh European Development Fund (Seventh EDF) and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Notranjega sporazuma 91/401/EGS o financiranju in upravljanju pomoči Skupnosti v okviru Četrte konvencije AKP–ES [1] s katerim je bil med drugim ustanovljen sedmi Evropski razvojni sklad (sedmi ERS), in zlasti člena 33(3) Notranjega sporazuma,
Having regard to Financial Regulation 91/491/EEC of 29 July 1991 applicable to development finance cooperation under the Fourth ACP-EC Convention [2], and in particular Articles 69 to 77 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Finančne uredbe 91/491/EGS z dne 29. julija 1991 o sodelovanju pri razvojnem financiranju v okviru Četrte konvencije AKP–ES [2], in zlasti členov 69 do 77 Finančne uredbe,
Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the Seventh EDF as of 31 December 2004 and the Court of Auditors' report concerning the financial year 2004 together with the Commission's replies [3],
po preučitvi izkaza prihodkov in odhodkov in bilance stanja v zvezi z dejavnostmi sedmega ERS na dan 31. decembra 2004 ter poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2004, skupaj z odgovori Komisije [3],
Whereas pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the Seventh EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council;
ker Evropski parlament na priporočilo Sveta podeli Komisiji razrešnico za finančno upravljanje sedmega ERS v skladu s členom 33(3) omenjenega notranjega sporazuma,
Whereas the overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the Seventh EDF during the financial year 2004 has been satisfactory;
ker je Komisija dejavnosti sedmega ERS v proračunskem letu 2004 na splošno zadovoljivo izvajala –
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the Seventh EDF for the financial year 2004.
PRIPOROČA, da Evropski parlament Komisiji podeli razrešnico za izvajanje dejavnosti sedmega ERS za proračunsko leto 2004.
concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (Eighth EDF) for the financial year 2004
o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji za izvajanje dejavnosti Evropskega razvojnega sklada (osmi ERS) za proračunsko leto 2004
Having regard to the Internal Agreement on the financing and administration of the Community aid under the Second Financial Protocol to the fourth ACP-EC Convention [1], setting up, amongst others, the Eighth European Development Fund (Eighth EDF), and in particular Article 33(3) of that Agreement,
ob upoštevanju Notranjega sporazuma o financiranju in upravljanju pomoči Skupnosti v okviru drugega finančnega protokola k Četrti konvenciji AKP–ES [1], s katerim je bil med drugim ustanovljen osmi Evropski razvojni sklad (osmi ERS), in zlasti člena 33(3) tega sporazuma,