natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2004 (IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do 31. decembra 2004 („OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 to the end of the investigation period (period considered).
Preiskava gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca obdobja preiskave („obravnavano obdobje“).
Lever arch mechanisms (LAM) are a metal product which can be one of the components of binders for storing sheets and other documents.
Vzvodni mehanizmi so kovinski izdelki, ki so lahko ena izmed komponent za vezavo za shranjevanje listov in drugih dokumentov.
The specification of the product mainly depends on the material used, the size of the mechanisms and the treatments of the steel.
Specifikacija izdelka je v glavnem odvisna od uporabljenega materiala, velikosti mehanizma in obdelave jekla.
The product concerned is lever arch mechanisms generally used for archiving sheets and other documents in binders or files.
Izdelek so vzvodni mehanizmi, ki se običajno uporabljajo za arhiviranje listov in drugih dokumentov v fasciklih ter mapah z nepovezanimi listi.
They consists of arched sturdy metal elements (normally two) on a back plate and having at least one opening trigger that permits inserting and filing of sheets and other documents, originating in the PRC (the product concerned), normally falling within CN code ex83051000.
Mehanizmi so sestavljeni iz (navadno dveh) čvrstih upognjenih kovinskih delov, ki sta pritrjena na hrbtišče in imata najmanj eno vzvodno ročico, ki omogoča vstavljanje in odlaganje listov in drugih dokumentov, s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“), običajno uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex83051000.
Despite differences in some factors such as, inter alia, the quality and thickness of the steel, the size of the mechanisms and the surface treatment, the investigation has shown that all types of the product concerned as defined in the preceding recital, have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and are used for the same purposes.
Kljub razlikam v nekaterih dejavnikih, kot so med drugim kakovost in debelina jekla, velikost mehanizmov in obdelava površine, je preiskava pokazala, da imajo vse vrste zadevnega izdelka, kot je opredeljeno v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in se uporabljajo v isti namen.
Therefore, and for the purpose of the present anti-dumping proceeding, all types of the product concerned are regarded as one single product.
Iz tega razloga in za namen tega protidampinškega postopka se vse vrste zadevnega izdelka štejejo za en sam izdelek.
No differences were found between the product concerned and the lever arch mechanisms produced and sold on the domestic markets in the PRC and Iran, which served as an analogue country for establishing the normal value with respect to imports from the PRC.
Med zadevnim izdelkom in vzvodnimi mehanizmi, proizvedenimi in prodanimi na domačem trgu v LRK in Iranu, ki je za namen določitve normalne vrednosti glede na uvoz iz LRK predstavljal primerljivo državo, ni bilo ugotovljenih razlik.
Indeed, these lever arch mechanisms have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and uses compared with that exported from the PRC to the Community.
Ti vzvodni mehanizmi imajo resnično enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe v primerjavi s tistimi, ki se izvažajo iz LRK v Skupnost.
Likewise, no differences were found between the lever arch mechanisms produced by the Community Industry and sold on the Community market and those imported from the PRC.
Prav tako ni bilo ugotovljenih razlik med vzvodnimi mehanizmi, ki jih je proizvedla industrija Skupnosti in prodala na trgu Skupnosti in tistimi, ki so bili uvoženi iz LRK.
They both share the same physical and technical characteristics and uses.
Oboji imajo enake fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti in uporabe.
Therefore, these products are provisionally considered to be alike within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se začasno šteje, da so ti izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe enaki.
Briefly and for ease of reference only, these criteria are set out in summarised form below:
Ta merila so na kratko navedena spodaj v strnjeni obliki, zaradi boljše preglednosti:
business decisions are made in response to market signals, without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez občutnega poseganja države, stroški pa odražajo tržne vrednosti,
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records, which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes,
družbe imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
there are no significant distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system,
ni znatnih izkrivljanj, prenesenih iz nekdanjega sistema netržnega gospodarstva,
Four exporting producers in the PRC requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and replied to the MET claim form for exporting producers.
Štirje proizvajalci izvozniki iz LRK so zahtevali TGO v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in izpolnili obrazce zahtevka za TGO za proizvajalce izvoznike.
However, three of these exporting producers withdrew their cooperation before the verification visit took place.
Vendar so trije od teh proizvajalcev izvoznikov svoje sodelovanje pred preveritvenim obiskom preklicali.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether these companies fulfilled the criteria set in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali so te družbe izpolnile merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
For the remaining exporting producer, the Commission sought and verified at the premises of the company all information submitted in the MET application as deemed necessary.
Za preostale proizvajalce izvoznike je Komisija v prostorih družbe iskala in preverila vse po njenem mnenju potrebne informacije, predložene v zahtevku za TGO.
The investigation revealed that the MET claim had to be rejected.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bilo treba zahtevek za TGO zavrniti.
The determinations for the company against each of the five criteria as set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation showed that the company did not meet the requirements of the above mentioned criteria two and three.
Ugotovitve v zvezi z družbo glede na pet meril, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, so pokazale, da ta družba ni izpolnila zahtevanih pogojev iz zgoraj omenjenih meril dva in tri.
In addition no conclusion could be reached with regard to criterion one.
Poleg tega ni bilo mogoče sprejeti sklepnih ugotovitev glede merila ena.
With regards to criterion two it could not be concluded that the company had a clear set of basic accounting record which were independently audited in line with international accounting standards and applied for all purposes.
Glede merila dva ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali ima družba jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi in se uporabljajo za vse namene.
For criterion three the company failed to provide supporting documents and a comprehensive explanation as to the privatisation of the company and the re-evaluation of the assets.
Za merilo tri družba ni mogla predložiti ustreznih dokazil ter celovite razlage glede privatizacije družbe in popravka vrednosti sredstev.
In light of this, the company did not demonstrate that there were no distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system.
Družba tudi ni dokazala, da ni bilo izkrivljanj, ki bi še ostala iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva.
No conclusion could be taken on criterion one due to remaining doubts on possible State interference with regard to the approval of labour contracts as well as the impossibility to determine whether all costs reflect market values.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče sprejeti sklepa glede merila ena zaradi še obstoječih dvomov o možnem poseganju države v zvezi z odobritvijo pogodb o delu, in ker ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali vsi stroški odražajo tržne vrednosti.
However, in view of the conclusions for criteria two and three, it is not necessary to take a decision in this respect.
Vendar glede na sklepne ugotovitve glede meril dva in tri v zvezi s tem ni potrebno sprejeti odločitve.
The interested parties were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Zainteresirane stranke so dobile možnost, da dajo pripombe na zgornje ugotovitve.
Further to Article 2(7)(a), of the basic Regulation a country-wide duty, if any, is established for countries falling under Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, except in those cases where companies are able to demonstrate, in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, that their export prices and quantities as well as the conditions and terms of the sales are freely determined, that exchange rates are carried out at market rates, and that any State interference is not such as to permit circumvention of measures if exporters are given different rates of duty.
Poleg tega se v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe za države iz člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe določi, če sploh, dajatev na ravni države razen v primerih, ko lahko družbe v skladu s 9(5) osnovne uredbe dokažejo, da so njihove izvozne cene in količine kot tudi pogoji prodaje prosto oblikovani, da se pretvorbe deviznih tečajev opravljajo po tržnih stopnjah in da poseganje države ne omogoča izogibanja ukrepom, če so izvoznikom določene različne stopnje dajatev.
The exporting producer to which MET could not be granted also claimed IT in the event it was not granted MET.
Proizvajalec izvoznik, ki mu TGO ni bil odobren, je zahteval IO tudi v primeru, da mu TGO ne bi bil odobren.
On the basis of the information available it was found that the company met all of the requirements to be granted IT in accordance with Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da je družba izpolnila vse pogoje za odobritev IO v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
One additional exporting producer, not having claimed MET, requested only IT.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik, ki ni zahteval TGO, je zahteval le IO.
This company had, via related companies, sales to independent customers in the Community during the IP and cooperated in the investigation.
Ta družba je preko povezanih družb prodajala neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti med OP in sodelovala pri preiskavi.
The investigation showed that the company met all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je ta družba izpolnila vse pogoje za IO, kot je določeno v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore concluded that IT should be granted to the following two exporting producers in the PRC:
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da se IO odobri naslednjima proizvajalcema izvoznikoma v LRK:
The exporting company which only requested IT failed to provide a comprehensive and fully substantiated reply to the exporter questionnaire within extended deadlines.
Izvozna družba, ki je zahtevala le IO, v podaljšanem roku ni predložila celovitih in zadostno utemeljenih odgovorov na vprašalnike za izvoznike.
On that basis, a determination of the dumping margin was not possible and the company had to be regarded as a non-cooperating party in the investigation.
Na podlagi tega ni bilo mogoče določiti stopnje dampinga in za družbo se je moralo šteti, da ne sodeluje v preiskavi.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET has to be established on the basis of the prices or constructed value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe mora biti normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi cen ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the Notice of Initiation, the Commission indicated its intention to use India as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and invited the interested parties to comment on the choice of the analogue country.
V obvestilu o začetku je Komisija navedla, da namerava uporabiti Indijo kot ustrezno primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK, zainteresirane stranke pa pozvala, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi z izbiro primerljive države.
One user, one cooperating exporter and one non-cooperating producer objected to this proposal.
En uporabnik, en sodelujoči izvoznik in en nesodelujoči proizvajalec so nasprotovali temu predlogu.
The main arguments against India as an analogue country were that:
Glavni argumenti proti Indiji kot primerljivi državi so bili, da:
there are only few Indian producers and there is no competition on the domestic Indian market,
je le nekaj indijskih proizvajalcev in da na notranjem indijskem trgu ni konkurence,
India only produces for its domestic market and not for export,
proizvaja Indija le za svoj notranji trg, ne pa za izvoz,
the production in India is with different specifications and the production process is therefore also different,
imajo izdelki, proizvedeni v Indiji, drugačne specifikacije in je zato drugačen tudi proizvodni proces,
the Indian volume of production is minor compared to the Chinese production,
je obseg indijske proizvodnje manjši v primerjavi s kitajsko proizvodnjo,
the Indian production is not stable with regard to quantity and quality.
indijska proizvodnja ni stabilna, kar zadeva količino in kakovost.
The interested parties, however, were not able to suggest a more appropriate alternative nor could they provide any details or substantiate their allegation that India was not an appropriate analogue country.
Vendar zainteresirane stranke niso mogle predlagati ustreznejše alternativne rešitve niti niso mogle predložiti podrobnosti ali utemeljiti trditve, da Indija ni ustrezna primerljiva država.
The Commission therefore sought cooperation from India but also from all other known potential analogue countries such as: Turkey, South Africa, Iran and Thailand.
Komisija je zato zaprosila za sodelovanje Indijo ter vse druge znane možne primerljive države, kot so: Turčija, Južna Afrika, Iran in Tajska.
It emerged however that from among those countries mentioned in the preceding recital, lever arch mechanisms are currently only produced by very few producers in India and Iran.
Izkazalo se je, da proizvaja v državah, omenjenih v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, vzvodne mehanizme trenutno le zelo malo število proizvajalcev v Indiji in Iranu.
Moreover, it was not possible to obtain full cooperation from India but the producer in Iran agreed to fully cooperate with the Commission.
Prav tako ni bilo mogoče vzpostaviti popolnega sodelovanja Indije, medtem ko so se iranski proizvajalci strinjali, da bodo s Komisijo v celoti sodelovali.
The analysis of the reply showed that Iran has one producer and that this producer had domestic sales.
Analiza izpolnjenih vprašalnikov je pokazala, da ima Iran enega proizvajalca in da prodaja na notranjem trgu.
In addition, it was found that there were substantial imports of the Chinese products on the Iranian market.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da je bil uvoz kitajskih izdelkov na iranski trg znaten.
It is clear therefore that the Iranian and Chinese products compete on the Iranian market.
Zato je jasno, da iranski in kitajski izdelki na iranskem trgu med seboj konkurirajo.
In view of the foregoing it is provisionally concluded that Iran is the most appropriate and reasonable analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno lahko začasno sklenemo, da je Iran najustreznejša in razumna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, the normal value for the exporting producers not granted MET was established on the basis of information received from the producer in the analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim TGO ni bil odobren, določena na podlagi informacij proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
The normal value was established on the basis of all prices paid or payable on the domestic market of Iran for comparable product types as the transactions by the producer in Iran were found to be made in the ordinary course of trade.
Normalna vrednost je bila določena na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih cen na notranjem iranskem trgu za primerljive vrste izdelka, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da je poslovanje proizvajalca v Iraku potekalo v običajnem poteku trgovine.
As a result, normal value was established as the weighted average domestic sales price to unrelated customers by the cooperating producer in Iran.
Posledično je bila normalna vrednost določena kot tehtana povprečna prodajna cena za nepovezane stranke s strani sodelujočega proizvajalca v Iranu.
For the export sales to the Community of the exporter granted IT which were made via related companies outside the Community, the export price was established on the basis of resale prices to independent customers in the Community.
Za izvoz v Skupnost, ki ga je izvoznik, kateremu je bil odobren IO, opravil preko povezanih družb izven Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
The normal value and export prices were compared on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno je bila narejena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovine.
In order to ensure a fair comparison between normal value and export price, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevane razlike v dejavnikih, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno in dokazano, da vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, allowances for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, credit, commissions and after sales costs (warranty/guarantee) could be granted to the extent that they were sufficiently substantiated.
Na podlagi tega so lahko bila ob predložitvi zadostno utemeljenih zahtevkov odobrena nadomestila za razlike v prevoznih in zavarovalniških stroških, stroških pretovarjanja, natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških posojila, provizij in poprodajnih stroškov (jamstvo/garancija).
Adjustments were also made where the export sales were made via a related company located in a country other than the country concerned or the Community, pursuant to Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene tudi, kjer je izvoz potekal preko povezane družbe s sedežem v državi, ki ni zadevna država ali ni članica Skupnosti, v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
For the cooperating exporting producer granted IT
Za sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika, ki mu je bil odobren IO
For the company granted individual treatment, the weighted average normal value for each type exported to the Community established for the analogue country was compared with the weighted average export price of the corresponding type exported to the Community, as provided in Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga v Skupnost izvozi družba, ki ji je bila odobrena individualna obravnava, se je tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost, določena za primerljivo državo, primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustrezne vrste, izvožene v Skupnost, kot je določeno v členu 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
The provisional weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price duty unpaid are:
Začasna tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, je:
In order to calculate the countrywide duty applicable to all other exporters in the PRC, the Commission first established the level of cooperation.
Za izračun dajatve na ravni države, ki bi bila uporabna za vse ostale izvoznike v LRK, je Komisija najprej ugotovila raven sodelovanja.
In this respect it is recalled that three of the four companies originally applying for MET withdrew their cooperation, and, except for one further company applying for IT only but which had to be regarded as non-cooperating, there was no cooperation from other Chinese exporting producers.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da so tri od štirih družb, ki so prvotno zahtevale TGO, preklicale svoje sodelovanje in razen ene družbe, ki je zahtevala le IO in za katero se je štelo, da ne sodeluje pri preiskavi, kitajski proizvajalci izvozniki niso sodelovali.
Given that there was no cooperation from exporters not granted either MET or IT, the calculation was based on facts available.
Glede na to, da izvozniki, ki jim TGO ali IO nista bila odobrena, niso sodelovali, je izračun temeljil na razpoložljivih dejstvih.
The countrywide dumping margin was consequently calculated based on the most representative PCN, exported from the PRC by exporters not granted MET or IT.
Izračun stopnje dampinga na ravni države je posledično temeljil na najbolj reprezentativni kontrolni številki izdelkov (PCN), ki jih je izvoznik, ki mu TGO in IO nista bila odobrena, izvozil iz LRK.
The export price was then compared with the normal value established for the analogue country.
Izvozna cena se je nato primerjala z normalno vrednostjo, določeno za primerljivo državo.
To ensure that this indeed was a fair comparison, the Commission additionally sought market information to establish the import prices from other exporting producers.
Da bi Komisija zagotovila, da je resnično šlo za pošteno primerjavo, je poiskala dodatne tržne informacije, da je določila uvozne cene drugih proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
No information found during this exercise showed that the calculations were not fair and reasonable.
Nobena tako pridobljena informacija ni pokazala, da izračun ne bi bil pravičen in razumen.
On this basis, the countrywide level of dumping was provisionally established at 48,1 % of the cif Community frontier price.
Na podlagi tega je bila začasno določena raven dampinga na ravni države, in sicer 48,1 % cene CIF meja Skupnosti.
This margin applies to all the producers to which no IT was granted.
Stopnja se uporablja za vse proizvajalce, ki jim IO ni bil odobren.
The investigation established that LAM were manufactured by the following producers in the Community during the investigation period: the three complainant Community producers, two other producers who supported the complaint and fully cooperated with the Commission during the investigation and Esselte who was only producing LAM for its own use.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so vzvodne mehanizme med obdobjem preiskave proizvajali naslednji proizvajalci v Skupnosti: trije proizvajalci pritožniki Skupnosti, dva druga proizvajalca, ki sta podprla pritožbo in v celoti sodelovala s Komisijo med obdobjem preiskave, ter družba Esselte, ki je proizvajala vzvodne mehanizme le za lastno uporabo.
Another company was producing and importing lever arch mechanisms exclusively for its own use during the IP.
Druga družba je v OP proizvajala in uvažala vzvodne mehanizme izključno za lastno uporabo.
However, it stopped production in the course of the IP.
Vendar je v teku OP prenehala s proizvodnjo.
The company replied to the questionnaire intended for Community producers and provided the data on its own production.
Družba je izpolnila vprašalnik, namenjen proizvajalcem Skupnosti, in predložila podatke o svoji lastni proizvodnji.
One further producer who submitted a letter of support to the complaint was found not to have produced the product concerned during the IP.
Za drugega proizvajalca, ki je pisno podprl pritožbo, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v OP proizvajal zadevni izdelek.