natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Accordingly, (subject to the requirement of designation at initial recognition) an entity that designates financial instruments as at fair value through profit or loss on the basis of this condition shall so designate all eligible financial instruments that are managed and evaluated together.
Skladno s tem (ob upoštevanju zahteve po označitvi ob začetnem pripoznanju) mora podjetje, ki označi finančne inštrumente po pošteni vrednosti skozi poslovni izid na podlagi tega pogoja, tako označiti vse primerne finančne inštrumente, ki jih obravnava in vrednoti skupaj.
Documentation of the entity’s strategy need not be extensive but should be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with paragraph 9(b)(ii).
Ni treba, da so listine o strategiji podjetja obsežne, morajo pa biti zadostne, da se dokaže skladnost s členom 9(b)(ii).
Such documentation is not required for each individual item, but may be on a portfolio basis.
Takšne listine niso potrebne so vsako posamezno postavko, ampak so lahko za portfelj.
For example, if the performance management system for a department — as approved by the entity’s key management personnel — clearly demonstrates that its performance is evaluated on a total return basis, no further documentation is required to demonstrate compliance with paragraph 9(b)(ii).
Na primer, če ureditev obravnavanja dosežkov za oddelek – kot ga je odobrilo ključno poslovodno osebje podjetja – jasno dokazuje, da se njegovi dosežki vrednotijo na podlagi celotnega donosa, dodatne listine za dokazovanje skladnosti z odstavkom 9(b)(ii) niso potrebne.
After paragraph AG33, a heading and paragraphs AG33A and AG33B are added, as follows.
Za členom AG33 se dodata naslov in člena AG33A in AG33B:
Instruments containing Embedded Derivatives
Inštrumenti, ki vsebujejo vgrajene izpeljane finančne inštrumente
When an entity becomes a party to a hybrid (combined) instrument that contains one or more embedded derivatives, paragraph 11 requires the entity to identify any such embedded derivative, assess whether it is required to be separated from the host contract and, for those that are required to be separated, measure the derivatives at fair value at initial recognition and subsequently.
Kadar podjetje postane stranka v mešanem (sestavljenem) inštrumentu, ki vsebuje enega ali več vgrajenih izpeljanih finančnih inštrumentov, člen 11 zahteva, da podjetje prepozna vsak takšen vgrajen izpeljan inštrument, oceni ali ga je treba ločiti od gostiteljske pogodbe, in izpeljane inštrumente, ki jih je treba ločiti, meri po pošteni vrednosti ob začetnem pripoznanju in pozneje.
These requirements can be more complex, or result in less reliable measures, than measuring the entire instrument at fair value through profit or loss.
Te zahteve so lahko bolj zapletene ali povzročijo merjenje, ki je manj zanesljivo od merjenja celotnega inštrumenta po pošteni vrednosti skozi poslovni izid.
For that reason this Standard permits the entire instrument to be designated as at fair value through profit or loss.
Zato ta standard dovoljuje, da se celotni inštrument označi po pošteni vrednosti skozi poslovni izid.
Such designation may be used whether paragraph 11 requires the embedded derivatives to be separated from the host contract or prohibits such separation.
Takšno označevanje se lahko uporablja, če člen 11 zahteva, da je vgrajeni izpeljani finančni inštrument treba ločiti od gostiteljske pogodbe ali takšno ločevanje prepoveduje.
However, paragraph 11A would not justify designating the hybrid (combined) instrument as at fair value through profit or loss in the cases set out in paragraph 11A(a) and (b) because doing so would not reduce complexity or increase reliability.
Vendar člen 11A ne bi upravičeval označevanja mešanega (sestavljenega) inštrumenta po pošteni vrednosti skozi poslovni izid v primerih, določenih v členu 11A(a) in (b), ker to ne bi zmanjšalo zapletenosti ali povečalo zanesljivosti.
In this Standard, monetary amounts are denominated in ‘currency units’ (CU)
V tem standardu so denarni zneski izraženi v „denarnih enotah“ (DE).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1865/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1865/2005
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 November 2005
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev za žita, ki se uporabljajo od 16. novembra 2005
Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 November 2005
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003, v uporabi od 16. novembra 2005
period from 2.11.2005-14.11.2005
obdobje od 2.11.2005–14.11.2005
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 21,14 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 29,45 EUR/t.
Prevoz/stroški: Mehiški zaliv–Rotterdam: 21,14 EUR/t; Velika jezera–Rotterdam: 29,45 EUR/t.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1866/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1866/2005
extending the partial suspension of the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005 on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel originating in Croatia and Ukraine
o podaljšanju delne opustitve dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, ki jih uvaja Uredba (ES) št. 258/2005 za uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla s poreklom iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE–
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1], (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 14(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 14(4) Uredbe,
Following a review investigation carried out in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (review investigation), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005 [2] (the definitive Regulation), imposed an anti-dumping duty of 38,8 % on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel (SST) originating in Croatia and an anti-dumping duty of 64,1 % on imports of SST originating in Ukraine with the exception of imports from Dnipropetrovsk Tube Works (DTW) which are subject to an anti-dumping duty of 51,9 % (the existing measures).
Po preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, izvedeni v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („preiskava v zvezi s pregledom“), je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/2005 [2] („končna uredba“) uvedel 38,8 % protidampinško dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla („SST“) s poreklom iz Hrvaške in 64,1 % protidampinško dajatev na uvoz SST s poreklom iz Ukrajine, razen na uvoz iz Dnipropetrovsk Tube Works („DTW“), ki je zavezan 51,9 % protidampinški dajatvi („obstoječi ukrepi“).
The definitive Regulation thus amended definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 348/2000 [3] and repealed the possibility of exemption from the duties provided for in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 348/2000 (original measures).
Končna uredba je spremenila dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 348/2000 [3], in razveljavila možnost oprostitve dajatev, kot je določeno v členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 348/2000 („prvotni ukrepi“).
By Decision 2005/133/EC [4] (the Decision), the Commission suspended the definitive anti-dumping duties partially for a period of nine months, with effect from 18 February 2005.
S Sklepom 2005/133/ES [4] („Sklep“) je Komisija delno opustila dokončne protidampinške dajatve za obdobje devetih mesecev z začetkom veljavnosti od 18. februarja 2005.
MEASURES IN FORCE ON IMPORTS OF SST FROM ROMANIA AND RUSSIA
VELJAVNI UKREPI ZA UVOZ SST IZ ROMUNIJE IN RUSIJE
By Regulation (EC) No 2320/97, anti-dumping duties were imposed on imports of SST originating, inter alia, in Romania and Russia [5].
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2320/97 so bile uvedene protidampinške dajatve na uvoz SST s poreklom med drugim iz Romunije in Rusije [5].
By Decisions 97/790/EC [6] and 2000/70/EC [7], undertakings were accepted from exporters in, inter alia, Romania and Russia.
S sklepoma 97/790/ES [6] in 2000/70/ES [7] so bile sprejete zaveze izvoznikov v, med drugim, Romuniji in Rusiji.
By Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004 [8], it was decided to no longer apply the measures in force on imports of SST originating in Romania and Russia (the non-applied measures) as a matter of prudence due to an anti-competitive behaviour of certain Community producers [9].
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1322/2004 [8] je bilo določeno, da se iz previdnosti, da ne bi prišlo do protikonkurenčnega ravnanja nekaterih proizvajalcev iz Skupnosti [9], ukine uporaba veljavnih ukrepov za uvoz SST s poreklom iz Romunije in Rusije („ukrepi, ki se ne uporabljajo“).
GROUNDS FOR EXTENDING THE PARTIAL SUSPENSION
RAZLOGI ZA PODALJŠANJE DELNE OPUSTITVE
Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation provides that, in the Community interest, anti-dumping measures may be suspended on the grounds that market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of such a suspension.
Člen 14(4) osnovne uredbe določa, da se protidampinški ukrepi v interesu Skupnosti lahko opustijo, če se tržne razmere spremenijo do te mere, da se škoda zaradi take opustitve verjetno ne bi ponovila.
The anti-dumping measures may be suspended by a decision of the Commission for a period of nine months.
Protidampinški ukrepi se lahko s sklepom Komisije opustijo za obdobje devetih mesecev.
Article 14(4) also specifies that the suspension may be extended for a further period, not exceeding one year, if the Council so decides on a proposal from the Commission.
Člen 14(4) nadalje določa, da je mogoče opustitev dodatno podaljšati za obdobje, ki ne sme biti daljše od enega leta, če se Svet na predlog Komisije tako odloči.
Article 14(4) further specifies that the anti-dumping measures concerned may be reinstated at any time if the reason for suspension is no longer applicable.
Člen 14(4) še natančneje določa, da se zadevne protidampinške ukrepe lahko kadar koli ponovno uvede, če razlogi za opustitev niso več veljavni.
Following the partial suspension of the definitive anti-dumping duties by the Decision, the Commission has continued to monitor the market situation of SST, in particular with regard to import flows from Croatia and Ukraine.
Po delni opustitvi protidampinških dajatev, uvedene s Sklepom, Komisija nadalje spremlja razmere na trgu SST, zlasti glede uvoznih tokov iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine.
An examination of recent import flows reveals that the imports from Croatia and Ukraine have remained at very low levels.
Pregled nedavnih uvoznih tokov je pokazal, da ostaja uvoz iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine v zelo majhnem obsegu.
It is considered that the market is in the same situation as when the measures were partially suspended.
Zato se šteje, da je trg v enakem položaju kot takrat, ko so bili ukrepi delno opuščeni.
Given the very low levels of imports from Croatia and Ukraine, it is considered that, in this specific situation, it is unlikely that injury to the Community industry would resume if the partial suspension of the measures would be extended.
Glede na zelo majhen obseg uvoza iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine, se šteje, da v teh posebnih razmerah ni verjetno, da bi se ponovila škoda industriji Skupnosti, če bi se podaljšala delna opustitev ukrepov.
Indeed, as long as the current market conditions prevail, where Russian and Romanian imports are likely to maintain their strong presence, it would be unlikely that Ukrainian and/or Croatian imports would increase significantly.
Dokler dejansko prevladujejo trenutni tržni pogoji in če bo uvoz iz Rusije in Romunije obdržal pomembno vlogo, ni pričakovati, da bi se uvoz iz Ukrajine in/ali Hrvaške znatno povečal.
As a result, injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of such extended suspension.
Posledično ni pričakovati, da bi se zaradi takšnega podaljšanja opustitve škoda ponovila.
Indeed, because of the special circumstances regarding, inter alia, the non-application of the measures on imports from Russia and Romania, it is considered that the duty levels of 23 % and 38,5 % established in the original investigation for Croatia and Ukraine respectively would be sufficient to eliminate injurious dumping.
Dejansko se zaradi posebnih okoliščin, med drugim, neuporabe ukrepov za uvoz iz Rusije in Romunije, šteje, da sta stopnji dajatev 23 % za Hrvaško in 38,5 % za Ukrajino, določeni v prvotni preiskavi, zadostni za odpravo škodljivega dampinga.
For the above reasons, it is proposed that the partial suspension of the anti-dumping measures on imports of SST be extended for a further period of one year, pursuant to Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi zgoraj navedenih razlogov se predlaga, da se delna opustitev protidampiških ukrepov za uvoz SST podaljša za obdobje enega leta, v skladu s členom 14(4) osnovne uredbe.
Should the reasons for the suspension no longer be applicable, the anti-dumping measures may be reinstated and the partial suspension repealed forthwith.
Če razlogi za opustitev niso več veljavni, se lahko protidampinške ukrepe nemudoma ponovno uvede, delno opustitev pa razveljavi.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation the Commission informed the Community industry of its intention to extend the partial suspension of the anti-dumping measures and provided it with an opportunity to comment.
V skladu z določbami iz člena 14(4) osnovne uredbe je Komisija obvestila industrijo Skupnosti o nameravanem podaljšanju delne opustitve protidampinških ukrepov in ji dala možnost za pripombe.
The Community industry did not raise any objection,
Industrija Skupnosti ni ugovarjala –
The partial suspension of the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Commission Decision 2005/133/EC is hereby extended until 18 November 2006.
Delna opustitev dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, ki je bila uvedena s Sklepom Komisije 2005/133/ES, se podaljša do 18. novembra 2006.
OJ L 46, 17.2.2005, p. 7.
UL L 46, 17.2.2005, str. 7.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/2005.
OJ L 46, 17.2.2005, p. 46.
UL L 46, 17.2.2005, str. 46.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004 (OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1322/2004 (UL L 246, 20.7.2004, str. 10).
See recitals (9) et seq. of Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004.
Glej uvodno izjavo (9) in naslednje Uredbe (ES) št. 1322/2004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1867/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1867/2005
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 November 2005.
Ta uredba začne veljati 17. novembra 2005.
to Commission Regulation of 16 November 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 16. novembra 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1868/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1868/2005
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1065/2005 [3] has opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 430000 tonnes of barley held by the German intervention agency.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1065/2005 [3] je odprla stalni javni razpis za izvoz 430000 ton ječmena iz zalog nemške intervencijske agencije.
Germany has informed the Commission of its intervention agency’s intention to increase by 100000 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export.
Nemčija je obvestila Komisijo, da namerava njena intervencijska agencija za 100000 ton povečati količino, razpisano na javnem razpisu za izvoz.
In view of this request, of the quantity available and of the market situation, the request made by Germany should be granted.
Ob upoštevanju tega zahtevka, razpoložljivih količin in položaja na trgu je treba ugodno odgovoriti na zahtevo Nemčije.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1065/2005 is replaced by the following:
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1065/2005 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 530000 tonnes of barley for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Switzerland and the United States of America.Article 2
Javni razpis zadeva največjo količino 530000 ton ječmena za izvoz v tretje države, razen v Albanijo, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Bolgarijo, Kanado, Hrvaško, Združene države Amerike, Lihtenštajn, Mehiko, Romunijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter Švico.Člen 2
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1298/2005 (OJ L 206, 9.8.2005, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1298/2005 (UL L 206, 9.8.2005, str. 3).
Including Kosovo, at defined by UN Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999.’
Vključno s Kosovom, kot določa Resolucija Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1869/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1869/2005
replacing the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
o nadomestitvi Prilog k Uredbi (ES) št. 805/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims [1], and in particular Article 31 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 805/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov [1] in zlasti člena 31 Uredbe,
After consulting the Committee established by Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 805/2004,
po posvetovanju z odborom, ustanovljenim s členom 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 805/2004,
Annexes I to VI to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 contain a series of standard forms to be used in the context of the European Enforcement Order procedure for uncontested claims.
Priloge I do VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 805/2004 vsebujejo niz standardnih obrazcev za uporabo v postopku za evropski nalog za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov.
Following the accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004, Annexes I to VI to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 should be replaced so as to adapt the standard forms for use in the new Member States.
Zaradi pristopa novih držav članic 1. maja 2004 je treba Priloge I do VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 805/2004 nadomestiti, tako da se standardni obrazci prilagodijo za uporabo v novih državah članicah.
Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 805/2004 je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti –
Annexes I to VI to Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 are replaced by the corresponding Annexes to this Regulation.
Priloge I do VI k Uredbi (ES) št. 805/2004 se nadomestijo z ustreznimi Prilogami k tej uredbi.
OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 15.
UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str. 15.
EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER CERTIFICATE — JUDGMENT
POTRDILO O EVROPSKEM NALOGU ZA IZVRŠBO – SODBA
Member State of origin: Belgium Czech Republic Germany Estonia Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Cyprus Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Hungary Malta Netherlands
Država članica izvora: Belgija Češka Nemčija Estonija Grčija Španija Francija Irska Italija Ciper Latvija Litva Luksemburg Madžarska Malta Nizozemska
Austria Poland Portugal Slovakia Slovenia Finland
Avstrija Poljska Portugalska Slovaška Slovenija Finska
Sweden United Kingdom
Švedska Združeno kraljestvo
Court/Tribunal issuing the certificate:
Sodišče, ki izdaja potrdilo
If different, Court/Tribunal giving the judgment:
Če je drugače, sodišče, ki je izdalo sodbo
Judgment:
Sodba
Reference number:
Referenčna številka:
The parties:
Stranke
Name and address of creditor(s):
Ime in naslov upnika (upnikov):
Name and address of debtor(s):
Ime in naslov dolžnika (dolžnikov):
Monetary claim as certified:
Denarni zahtevek, kot je potrjen
Principal amount:
Glavnica:
If the claim is for periodical payments
Če se zahtevek glasi na občasna plačila
Amount of each instalment:
Znesek vsakega obroka:
Due date of first instalment:
Datum zapadlosti prvega obroka:
Due dates of following instalments
Datum zapadlosti naslednjih obrokov
weekly monthly other (explain)
tedensko mesečno drugo (razložite)
Period of the claim
Zapadlost zahtevka
Currently indefinite or
Trenutno nedoločeno ali
Due date of last instalment:
Datum zapadlosti zadnjega obroka:
Interest rate
Obrestna mera
… % or
… % ali
… % above the base rate of the ECB (1)
… % nad temeljno obrestno mero ECB (1)
Other (explain)
Drugo (razložite)
Interest to be collected as from:
Obresti se obračunajo od:
Amount of reimbursable costs if specified in the judgment:
Znesek povračljivih stroškov, če so navedeni v sodbi:
Judgment is enforceable in the Member State of origin
Sodba je izvršljiva v državi članici izvora
Judgment is still subject to the possibility of a challenge
Sodbo se še lahko izpodbija
Judgment is on an uncontested claim under Article 3(1)
Sodba je v zvezi z nespornim zahtevkom na podlagi člena 3(1)
Judgment is in compliance with Article 6(1)(b)
Sodba je v skladu s členom 6(1)(b)
The judgment concerns matters relating to consumer contracts
Sodba se nanaša na zadeve v zvezi s potrošniškimi pogodbami
If yes:
Če da:
The debtor is the consumer
je dolžnik potrošnik
The debtor is domiciled in the Member State of origin (within the meaning of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001)
ima dolžnik stalno prebivališče oziroma sedež v državi članici izvora (v smislu člena 59 Uredbe (ES) No 44/2001)
Service of the document instituting the proceedings under Chapter III, where applicable
Vročitev listine o začetku postopka na podlagi Poglavja III, kjer je to primerno
Service was effected in compliance with Article 13
Vročitev je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 13
or service was effected in compliance with Article 14
ali vročitev je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 14
or it is proved in accordance with Article 18(2) that the debtor has received the document
ali je v skladu s členom 18(2) dokazano, da je dolžnik prejel listino
Due information
Ustrezne informacije
The debtor was informed in compliance with Articles 16 and 17
Dolžnik je bil obveščen v skladu s členoma 16 in 17
Service of summons, where applicable
Vročitev poziva, kjer je primerno
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations.
Obrestna mera, ki jo Evropska centralna banka uporablja za svoje glavne operacije refinanciranja.
or it is proved in accordance with Article 18(2) that the debtor has received the summons
ali je v skladu s členom 18(2) dokazano, da je dolžnik prejel poziv
The debtor was informed in compliance with Article 17
Dolžnik je bil obveščen v skladu s členom 17
Cure of non-compliance with procedural minimum standards pursuant to Article 18(1)
Popravek neskladnosti z minimalnimi postopkovnimi standardi v skladu s členom 18(1)
Service of the judgment was effected in compliance with Article 13
Vročitev sodbe je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 13
or service of the judgment was effected in compliance with Article 14
ali vročitev sodbe je bila opravljena v skladu s členom 14
or it is proved in accordance with Article 18(2) that the debtor has received the judgment
ali je v skladu s členom 18(2) dokazano, da je dolžnik prejel sodbo
The debtor was informed in compliance with Article 18(1)(b)
Dolžnik je bil obveščen v skladu s členom 18(1)(b)
It was possible for the debtor to challenge the judgment
Dolžnik je imel možnost zoper sodbo vložiti pravno sredstvo
The debtor failed to challenge the judgment in compliance with the relevant procedural requirements
Dolžnik zoper sodbo ni vložil pravnega sredstva v skladu z ustreznimi postopkovnimi pravili
Yes No Done at Date
Da Ne V , dne
Signature and/or stamp
Podpis in/ali žig
EUROPEAN ENFORCEMENT ORDER CERTIFICATE — COURT SETTLEMENT
POTRDILO O EVROPSKEM NALOGU ZA IZVRŠBO – SODNA PORAVNAVA
Court issuing the certificate
Sodišče, ki izdaja potrdilo
If different, Court approving the settlement or before which it was concluded
Če je drugače, sodišče, ki je potrdilo poravnavo ali pred katerim je bila poravnava sklenjena
Court settlement
Sodna poravnava
The parties
Stranke