natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
taking reasonable measures to obtain assurance that the declarations of expenditure the responsible authority certifies to the Commission are correct insofar as:
sprejemanje razumnih ukrepov za pridobitev zagotovila, da so poročila o izdatkih, ki jih odgovorni organ potrdi Komisiji, pravilna, če:
expenditure was effected within the eligible period in projects selected for co-financing in accordance with normal procedures and all applicable terms and conditions,
so izdatki nastali v upravičenem obdobju pri projektih, izbranih za sofinanciranje v skladu z normalnimi postopki in vsemi veljavnimi pogoji,
the co-financed projects have actually been carried out.
so sofinancirani projekti dejansko izvedeni.
Sufficient quantity and quality of sample checks on projects and adequate follow-up:
Zadostna količina in kakovost vzorčnih pregledov projektov in ustrezno spremljanje:
carrying out sample checks on at least 10 % of total eligible expenditure in accordance with Article 4 of this Decision, supported by a report on the work done by the auditor;
izvajanje vzorčnih pregledov pri najmanj 10 % skupnih upravičenih izdatkov v skladu s členom 4 te odločbe, podprtih s poročilom o delu, ki ga je opravil revizor;
the sample is representative and the risk analysis adequate;
vzorec je reprezentativen in analiza tveganja ustrezna;
adequate separation of functions vis-à-vis line management to ensure independence;
ustrezna delitev funkcij glede na hierarhično organizacijo, ki zagotavlja neodvisnost;
follow-up to checks, ensuring:
nadaljnje spremljanje pregledov, ki zagotavlja:
appropriate assessment of results and financial corrections where appropriate,
ustrezno oceno rezultatov in finančnih popravkov, kjer je primerno,
action at a general level to correct systemic irregularities.
ukrep na splošni ravni za odpravljanje sistemskih nepravilnosti.
Ancillary elements
Pomožne sestavine
satisfactory administrative controls in the form of standard checklists or equivalent means and proper documentation of results, to ensure for instance:
zadovoljiv upravni nadzor v obliki standardnih kontrolnih seznamov ali enakovrednega sredstva in pravilno dokumentiranje rezultatov, ki na primer zagotavlja:
that claims have not been paid before and transactions (contracts, receipts, invoices, payments) are separately identifiable,
da zahtevki pred tem še niso bili plačani in so transakcije (pogodbe, prejemi, računi, plačila) ločeno prepoznavne;
reconciliation within the accounting system of declarations and expenditure recorded;
usklajevanje znotraj računovodskega sistema poročil in zabeleženih izdatkov;
proper supervision of claims processing and authorisation procedures;
pravilen nadzor obdelave zahtevkov in postopkov odobritve;
satisfactory procedures to ensure proper dissemination of information about Community rules;
zadovoljivi postopki za zagotavljanje pravilnega razširjanja informacij o predpisih Skupnosti;
ensuring timely payment of Community funding to beneficiaries.
zagotavljanje pravočasnih izplačil sredstev Skupnosti upravičencem.
Indicative scales of flat-rate corrections
Okvirne lestvice pavšalnih popravkov
100 % correction
100 % popravek
The rate of correction may be fixed at 100 % when the deficiencies in the Member State's management and control system are, or an individual breach is, so serious as to constitute a complete failure to comply with Community rules, so rendering all the payments irregular.
Stopnja popravka se lahko fiksno določi na 100 %, kadar so pomanjkljivosti v sistemu države članice za upravljanje in nadzor ali so posamezne kršitve tako resne, da predstavljajo popolno nezmožnost izpolnjevanja pravil Skupnosti, tako da so vsa plačila neregularna.
25 % correction
25 % popravek
When a Member State's application of its management and control system is gravely deficient, and there is evidence of widespread irregularity, and negligence in countering irregular or fraudulent practices, a correction of 25 % is justified, as it can then reasonably be assumed that the freedom to submit irregular claims with impunity will occasion exceptionally high losses to the Fund.
Kadar je uporaba sistema države članice za upravljanje in nadzor hudo pomanjkljiva in obstaja dokaz o obsežnih nepravilnostih in malomarnosti pri odpravljanju nepravilnosti ali sleparski praksi, je utemeljen 25 % popravek, ker se lahko upravičeno predpostavlja, da bodo proste možnosti za nekaznovano predložitev nepravilnih zahtevkov povzročile izjemno velike izgube za sklad.
A correction at this rate is also appropriate for irregularities in an individual case which are serious but do not invalidate the whole project.
Popravek te stopnje je ustrezen tudi za nepravilnosti v posameznem primeru, ki so resne, vendar ne razveljavijo celotnega projekta.
10 % correction
10 % popravek
When one or more key elements of the system do not function or function so poorly or so infrequently that they are completely ineffective in determining the eligibility of the claim or preventing irregularity, a correction of 10 % is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that there was a high risk of widespread loss to the Fund.
Kadar ena ali več ključnih sestavin sistema ne deluje ali delujejo tako slabo ali neredno, da so povsem neučinkovite za določanje upravičenosti zahtevka ali preprečevanje nepravilnosti, je utemeljen 10 % popravek, ker je razumno sklepati, da obstaja veliko tveganje obsežne izgube za sklad.
This rate of correction is also appropriate for individual irregularities of moderate seriousness in relation to key elements of the system.
Ta stopnja popravka je ustrezna tudi za posamezne nepravilnosti zmerne resnosti glede na ključne sestavine sistema.
5 % correction
5 % popravek
When all the key elements of the system function, but not with the consistency, frequency, or depth required by the regulations, then a correction of 5 % is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that they do not provide a sufficient level of assurance of the regularity of claims, and that the risk to the Fund was significant.
Kadar vse ključne sestavine sistema delujejo, vendar ne tako dosledno, pogosto ali poglobljeno, kakor zahtevajo predpisi, je utemeljen 5 % popravek, ker je razumno sklepati, da ne zagotavljajo zadostne ravni pravilnosti zahtevkov in obstaja znatno tveganje za sklad.
A 5 % correction can also be appropriate for less serious irregularities in individual projects in relation to key elements.
5 % popravek je lahko ustrezen tudi za manj resne nepravilnosti v posameznih projektih glede na ključne sestavine.
The fact that the way in which a system operates is perfectible is not in itself sufficient grounds for a financial correction.
Dejstvo, da je mogoče način, kako sistem deluje, izpopolniti, samo po sebi ni zadosten razlog za finančni popravek.
There must be a serious deficiency of compliance with explicit Community rules or standards of good practice and the deficiency must expose the Fund to a real risk of loss or irregularity.
Obstajati mora resna pomanjkljivost skladnosti z izrecnimi pravili Skupnosti ali standardi dobre prakse in pomanjkljivost mora predstavljati za sklad resno tveganje izgube ali nepravilnost.
2 % correction
2 % popravek
When performance is adequate in relation to the key elements of the system, but there is a complete failure to operate one or more ancillary elements, a correction of 2 % is justified in view of the lower risk of loss to the Fund, and the lesser seriousness of the infringement.
Kadar je izvajanje ustrezno glede na ključne sestavine sistema, vendar povsem odpove pri delovanju ene ali več pomožnih sestavin, je utemeljen 2 % popravek glede na manjše tveganje izgube za sklad in manjšo resnost kršitve.
A 2 % correction will be increased to 5 % if the same deficiency is established in relation to expenditure after the date of the first correction imposed and the Member State has failed to take adequate corrective measures for the part of the system at fault after the first correction.
2 % popravek se poveča na 5 %, če se po datumu uvedbe prvega popravka ugotovi ista pomanjkljivost v zvezi z izdatki in država članica po prvem popravku ne sprejme ustreznih korektivnih ukrepov za del sistema z napako.
A correction of 2 % is also justified where the Commission has informed the Member State, without imposing any correction, of the need to make improvements to ancillary elements of the system that are in place but do not operate satisfactorily, but the Member State has not taken the necessary action.
2 % popravek je utemeljen tudi, kadar Komisija obvesti državo članico, ne da bi uvedla kak popravek, da je treba izboljšati pomožne sestavine sistema, ki so uvedene, vendar ne delujejo zadovoljivo, država članica pa ne sprejme potrebnih ukrepov.
Corrections are only imposed for deficiencies in ancillary elements of management and control systems where no deficiencies have been identified in key elements.
Popravki se naložijo samo za pomanjkljivosti v pomožnih sestavinah sistemov za upravljanje in nadzor, kadar niso ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti pri ključnih sestavinah.
If there are deficiencies in relation to ancillary elements as well as in key elements, corrections are only made at the rate applicable to the key elements.
Če obstajajo pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s pomožnimi, pa tudi ključnimi sestavinami, se popravki naredijo samo po stopnji, ki se uporablja za ključne sestavine.
Borderline cases
Mejni primeri
Where the correction resulting from a strict application of these guidelines would be clearly disproportionate, a lower rate of correction may be proposed.
Kadar popravek, ki izhaja iz dosledne uporabe teh smernic, ne bi bil jasno sorazmeren, se lahko predlaga nižja stopnja popravka.
For example, where the deficiencies arose from difficulties in the interpretation of Community rules or requirements (except in cases where it should reasonably be expected that the Member State raise such difficulties with the Commission), and the national authorities took effective steps to remedy the deficiencies as soon as they were brought to light, this mitigating factor may be taken into account and a lower rate or no correction may be proposed.
Na primer, kadar pomanjkljivosti izhajajo iz težav pri razlagi pravil ali zahtev Skupnosti (razen v primerih, ko se upravičeno pričakuje, da bo država članica povzročala Komisiji take težave) in nacionalni organi sprejmejo učinkovite ukrepe za izboljšanje pomanjkljivosti, takoj ko so te odkrite, se lahko upošteva ta olajševalni dejavnik in predlaga popravek na nižji stopnji ali da ni popravka.
Similarly, due regard should be paid to claims of legal security when the deficiencies were not reported following earlier audits by the Commission's services.
Podobno je treba posvetiti ustrezno pozornost pravni varnosti zahtevkov, kadar pomanjkljivosti po predhodnih revizijah s stani služb Komisije niso zabeležene.
In general, the fact that deficient management or control systems were improved immediately after the deficiencies were reported to the Member State is not considered as a mitigating factor when assessing the financial impact of the systemic irregularities before the improvement was made.
Na splošno pa dejstvo, da so sistemi za upravljanje ali nadzor izboljšani takoj potem, ko so pomanjkljivosti sporočene državi članici, ne šteje za olajševalni dejavnik pri ocenjevanju finančnega vpliva sistemske nepravilnosti, preden je bilo narejeno izboljšanje.
Basis of assessment
Osnova za oceno
Whenever the situation in other Member States is known, the Commission should perform (there should be) a comparison between them to ensure equal treatment in the assessment of the rates of correction.
Vedno kadar je znano stanje v drugih državah članicah, mora Komisija narediti medsebojno primerjavo (ali mora obstajati), da zagotovi enako obravnavo pri oceni stopenj popravka.
The rate of correction should be applied to that part of the expenditure placed at risk.
Stopnja popravka naj se uporabi za tisti del izdatkov, ki so ogroženi.
When the deficiency results from a failure by the Member State to adopt an appropriate control system, then the correction should be applied to the entire expenditure for which that control system was required.
Kadar je pomanjkljivost posledica tega, da država članica ni sprejela ustreznega sistema nadzora, se popravek uporabi za celotne izdatke, za katere je bil potreben ta sistem.
When there is reason to suppose that the deficiency is limited to that of a particular authority's or region's application of the control system adopted by the Member State, the correction should be limited to the expenditure controlled by that authority or region.
Kadar obstaja razlog za domnevo, da je pomanjkljivost omejena na pomanjkljivost uporabe nadzornega sistema, ki ga je sprejela država članica, s strani določenega organa ali regije, naj se popravek omeji na izdatke, ki jih nadzira ta organ ali regija.
When the deficiency relates for example to verification of the criteria for eligibility for a higher rate of aid, then the correction should be based on the difference between the higher and lower rate of aid.
Kadar se pomanjkljivost nanaša na primer na preverjanje meril za upravičenost do višje stopnje pomoči, naj popravek temelji na razliki med višjo in nižjo stopnji pomoči.
The correction should normally concern the expenditure of the measure over the period being examined, for example one financial year.
Popravek se navadno nanaša na izdatke ukrepa v proučevanem obdobju, na primer v enem finančnem letu.
However, when the irregularity results from systemic deficiencies, which are evidently long-standing and affecting several years' expenditure, then the correction should concern all the expenditure declared by the Member State while the system deficiency obtained until the month in which it was remedied.
Kadar pa je nepravilnost posledica sistemskih pomanjkljivosti, ki so očitno dolgotrajne in so več let vplivale na izdatke, naj se popravek nanaša na vse izdatke, ki jih je navedla država članica od nastanka sistemske pomanjkljivosti do meseca, v katerem je odpravljena.
When several deficiencies are found in the same system, the flat rates of correction are not cumulated, the most serious deficiency being taken as an indication of the risks presented by the control system as a whole [2].
Kadar je ugotovljenih več pomanjkljivosti v istem sistemu, se pavšalne stopnje popravka ne seštevajo, najresnejša pomanjkljivost se jemlje kot prikaz tveganj, ki jih predstavlja sistem nadzora kot celota [2].
They are applied to the expenditure remaining after deduction of the amounts refused for individual files.
Uporabljajo se za izdatke, ki ostanejo po odbitku zavrnjenih zneskov za posamezne dokumente.
In the case of the Member State's non-application of penalties prescribed by Community law, the financial correction should be the amount of the penalties not applied, together with 2 % of the remaining claims, as the non-application of penalties increases the risk that irregular claims will be submitted.
V primeru, da država članica ne uporabi kazni, predpisanih z zakonodajo Skupnosti, je finančni popravek znesek neuporabljenih kazni, skupaj z 2 % preostalih zahtevkov, ker neuporaba kazni povečuje tveganje, da bodo predloženi nepravilni zahtevki.
APPLICATION AND EFFECT OF NET FINANCIAL CORRECTIONS
UPORABA IN UČINEK ČISTIH FINANČNIH POPRAVKOV
Where the Member State made the financial correction proposed in the procedure under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC, the Commission need not impose a net reduction in the funding, but may allow the Member State to reallocate the sums released.
Kadar država članica naredi finančni popravek, predlagan v postopku na podlagi člena 26(2) Odločbe 2004/904/ES, Komisija ne naloži čistega znižanja financiranja, ampak lahko dovoli državi članici, da ponovno dodeli sproščene vsote.
However, financial corrections imposed by the Commission under Article 26(2) of Decision 2004/904/EC after completion of the procedure laid down by Article 26(3) and (4) of the same Decision will in all cases involve a net reduction in the indicative allocation of assistance from the Fund.
Vendar finančni popravki, ki jih naloži Komisija na podlagi člena 26(2) Odločbe 2004/904/ES po dokončanju postopka iz členov 26(3) in (4) iste odločbe, v vseh primerih vključujejo čisto znižanje okvirne dodelitve pomoči iz sklada.
A net correction is automatically made if the Commission considers that the Member State has not taken satisfactory account of conclusions on irregularities detected by Community or national bodies and/or if the irregularity is related to a serious deficiency in the management or control system of the Member State or of the management or payment authorities.
Čisti popravek se naredi avtomatsko, če Komisija meni, da država članica ni zadovoljivo upoštevala sklepnih odločitev o nepravilnostih, ki so jih odkrili organi Skupnosti ali države in/ali če se nepravilnost nanaša na resno pomanjkljivost v sistemu upravljanja ali nadzora države članice, organov upravljanja ali plačilnih organov.
Any sum due to the Commission as a result of net corrections is to be paid together with interest under Article 26(4) of Decision 2004/904/EC and in accordance with Article 3(1) of this Decision.
Katera koli vsota, ki je dolgovana Komisiji zaradi čistih popravkov, se plača skupaj z obrestmi na podlagi člena 26(4) Odločbe 2004/904/ES in v skladu s členom 3(1) te odločbe.
See also section 2.3 (2 % correction).
Glej tudi poglavje 2.3 (2 % popravek).
laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Decision 2004/904/EC as regards Member States management and control systems, and rules for the administrative and financial management of projects co-financed by the European Refugee Fund
o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Odločbe Sveta 2004/904/ES glede sistemov držav članic za upravljanje in nadzor ter pravil upravnega in finančnega upravljanja projektov, ki jih sofinancira Evropski sklad za begunce
(notified under document number C(2006) 51/3)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 51/3)
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/904/EC of 2 December 2004 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2005 to 2010 [1], and in particular Article 13, paragraph 5 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2004/904/ES z dne 2. decembra 2004 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2005–2010 [1] in zlasti člena 13(5) Odločbe,
To ensure sound financial management of the assistance granted from the European Refugee Fund (the Fund), common guidelines should be adopted for the organisation of the tasks of the authorities responsible for implementing co-financed actions.
Da bi zagotovili dobro finančno poslovodenje pomoči, odobrene iz Evropskega sklada za begunce (v nadaljnjem besedilu „sklad“), je treba sprejeti splošne smernice za organizacijo nalog organov, odgovornih za izvajanje sofinanciranih dejavnosti.
To ensure that the Community funds are utilised in accordance with the principles of sound financial management, management and control systems should be introduced that provide a sufficient audit trail, and lend the Commission any assistance it requires to carry out checks, especially sample checks.
Da bi zagotovili, da se sredstva iz skladov Skupnosti izkoriščajo v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, je treba uvesti sisteme za upravljanje in nadzor, ki zagotavljajo zadostno revizijsko sled, in nuditi Komisiji pomoč, ki jo ta potrebuje za izvajanje pregledov, zlasti vzorčnih.
To ensure that Community funds are used efficiently and appropriately, uniform criteria should be established for the checks carried out by the Member States under Article 25 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
Da bi zagotovili, da se sredstva iz skladov Skupnosti uporabljajo učinkovito in ustrezno, je treba določiti enotna merila za preglede, ki jih izvajajo države članice na podlagi člena 25 Odločbe 2004/904/ES.
To ensure uniform treatment of the declarations of expenditure for which assistance is requested from the Fund under Article 24 of Decision 2004/904/EC, a model declaration of expenditure should be produced.
Da bi zagotovili enotno obravnavo izjav o izdatkih, za katere se zahteva pomoč sklada na podlagi člena 24 Odločbe 2004/904/ES, je treba pripraviti vzorec izjave o izdatkih.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom takes part in Decision 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decision.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Združeno kraljestvo sodeluje pri Odločbi 2004/904/ES in posledično pri tej odločbi.
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Ireland takes part in Decision in 2004/904/EC and by consequence in this present decison.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Irska sodeluje pri Odločbi 2004/904/ES in posledično pri tej odločbi.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not take part in Decision 2004/904/EC and is not bound by it nor by this present decision.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri Odločbi 2004/904/ES in zato ta zanjo ni zavezujoča, niti je ne zavezuje ta odločba.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 11 of Decision 2004/904/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 11 Odločbe 2004/904/ES –
SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
OBSEG UPORABE IN OPREDELITVE
This Decision lays down the detailed rules for implementing Decision 2004/904/EC as regards management and control systems and rules for the administrative and financial management for funding granted from the European Refugee Fund ‘the Fund’ and managed by the Member States.
Ta odločba določa podrobna pravila za izvajanje Odločbe 2004/904/ES glede sistemov za upravljanje in nadzor ter pravil upravnega in finančnega upravljanja sredstev, odobrenih iz Evropskega sklada za begunce (v nadaljevanju „Sklad“), ki jih upravljajo države članice.
For the purposes of this Decision the following definition shall be used:
Za namene te odločbe se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve:
‘Responsible Authority’: any functional body of the Member State or national public body designated by a Member State under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
„Odgovorni organ“: vsako funkcionalno telo države članice ali nacionalno javno telo, ki ga imenuje država članica v skladu s členom 13(1) Odločbe 2004/904/ES.
‘Delegated Authority’: any public administration, or private-law body governed by the law of the Member State and which has a public-service mission, to which the Responsible Authority delegates some or all of its implementation tasks under Article 13, paragraph 1 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
„Delegiran organ“: vsako telo javne uprave ali telo zasebnega prava, za katerega velja pravo države članice in ki opravlja javno funkcijo, na katerega odgovorni organ prenese nekatere ali vse svoje naloge izvajanja po členu 13(1) Odločbe 2004/904/ES.
‘Certifying Authority’: any individual or department operationally independent of any authorising department of the Responsible Authority and of any delegated Authority designated by the Member State for the purposes of the certification of declarations of expenditure under Article 24, paragraph 2 of Decision 2004/904/EC.
„Organ za potrjevanje“: vsak posameznik ali oddelek, ki deluje neodvisno od službe za odobravanje odgovornega organa in vsakega delegiranega organa, imenovanega s strani države članice za namene potrjevanja izjav o izdatkih v skladu s členom 24(2) Odločbe 2004/904/ES.