natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Republic of Poland is authorised to prohibit the use, in any part of its territory, of the 16 genetically modified varieties of maize listed in the 13th supplement to the 22nd complete edition of the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species and listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Republiki Poljski se dovoli, da na vseh delih svojega ozemlja prepove uporabo šestnajstih gensko spremenjenih sort koruze, navedenih v 13. dodatku k 22. dopolnjeni izdaji skupnega kataloga sort poljščin in v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
In order to allow the Commission to inform the other Member States, the Republic of Poland shall notify the Commission of the date from which it makes use of the authorisation given under Article 1.
Da lahko Komisija obvesti druge države članice, Republika Poljska obvesti Komisijo o datumu, od katerega uporablja dovoljenje iz člena 1.
Done at Brussels, 8 May 2006.
V Bruslju, 8. maja 2006
of 10 May 2006
z dne 10. maja 2006
amending Decision 2005/380/EC establishing a group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law
o spremembi Sklepa Komisije 2005/380/ES z dne 28. aprila 2005 o ustanovitvi skupine nevladnih strokovnjakov za upravljanje podjetij in pravo družb
Mr. Lajos Váradi is appointed member of the group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law, as a replacement for Mr. Józef Okolski.
Na mesto g. Józefa Okolskega je za člana skupine nevladnih strokovnjakov za upravljanje podjetij in pravo družb imenovan G. Lajos Váradi.
Done at Brussels, 10 May 2006.
V Bruslju, 10. maja 2006
OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 40.
UL L 126, 19.5.2005, str. 40.
Having regard to Commission Decision 2005/380/EC of 28 April 2005 establishing a group of non-governmental experts on corporate governance and company law [1], and in particular Articles 3 and 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije 2005/380/ES z dne 28. aprila 2005 o ustanovitvi skupine nevladnih strokovnjakov za upravljanje podjetij in pravo družb [1], in zlasti členov 3 in 4 Sklepa,
A member of the group has resigned during his period of appointment. Therefore, the Commission should appoint a new member of the group,
Član skupine je odstopil v obdobju njegovega imenovanja – Komisija mora zato imenovati novega člana skupine.
establishing standard forms for the transmission of applications and decisions pursuant to Council Directive 2004/80/EC relating to compensation to crime victims
o oblikovanju standardnih obrazcev za posredovanje zahtev in odločitev v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/80/ES v zvezi z odškodnino žrtvam kaznivih dejanj
Having regard to Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims [1], and in particular Article 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/80/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 v zvezi z odškodnino žrtvam kaznivih dejanj [1], in zlasti člena 14 Direktive,
After consulting the Committee established by Article 15(1) of the Directive 2004/80/EC,
po posvetovanju z odborom iz člena 15(1) Direktive 2004/80/ES,
Directive 2004/80/EC requires Member States to introduce a system of cooperation to facilitate access to compensation in cases where a crime is committed in a Member State other than that of the victim’s residence by 1 January 2006.
Direktiva 2004/80/ES določa, da morajo države članice do 1. januarja 2006 uvesti sistem sodelovanja, da se olajša dostop do odškodnine v primerih, ko je kaznivo dejanje storjeno v državi članici, ki ni država prebivališča žrtve.
The standard forms to be used for the transmission of applications for compensation and decisions relating to applications for compensation in such cross-border situations should be established,
Treba je oblikovati standardne obrazce za posredovanje zahtev za uveljavljanje odškodnine in odločitev glede zahtev za uveljavljanje odškodnine v takih čezmejnih primerih –
The standard form for the transmission of applications for compensation provided for in Article 6(2) of Directive 2004/80/EC shall be as set out in Annex I.
Standardni obrazec za posredovanje zahtev za uveljavljanje odškodnine iz člena 6(2) Direktive 2004/80/ES se določi v Prilogi I.
The standard form for the transmission of decisions on applications for compensation provided for in Article 10 of Directive 2004/80/EC shall be as set out in Annex II.
Standardni obrazec za posredovanje odločitev o zahtevah za uveljavljanje odškodnine iz člena 10 Direktive 2004/80/ES se določi v Prilogi II.
OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p. 15.
UL L 261, 6.8.2004, str. 15.
FORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION IN CROSS-BORDER SITUATIONS
OBRAZEC ZA POSREDOVANJE ZAHTEVE ZA UVELJAVLJANJE ODŠKODNINE V ČEZMEJNIH PRIMERIH
(Article 6(2) of Directive 2004/80/EC)
(člen 6(2) Direktive 2004/80/ES)
Case reference:
Številka zadeve:
Language of the application and any supporting documentation (Article 6(3) of Directive 2004/80/EC):
Jezik, v katerem so zahteve in priložena dokazila sestavljena (člen 6(3) Direktive 2004/80/ES):
Application transmitted by:
Zahtevo je posredoval:
Details of the assisting authority (transmitting authority):
Podatki o organu za sodelovanje (organ za posredovanje)
Name of the authority:
Naziv organa:
Contact person or the department responsible for handling the matter:
Kontaktna oseba ali oddelek, pristojen za obravnavanje zadeve:
Telephone (including code):
Tel. (vključno s klicno številko):
Details of the deciding authority (receiving authority):
Podatki o organu odločanja (organ za prejem)
Details of the person applying for compensation:
Podatki o prosilcu:
Family name:
Priimek:
First Name:
Ime:
Address and postcode:
Naslov in poštna številka:
Place where the person habitually lives (if different from place of residence):
Kraj, kjer prosilec običajno prebiva (če se razlikuje od stalnega prebivališča):
Bank details (For transfers, the BIC must be provided instead of the bank code, and the IBAN must be given instead of the account number):
Bančni podatki (za nakazila je treba navesti BIC namesto bančne kode in IBAN namesto številke računa):
Name of bank:
Naziv banke:
Contact abroad:
Kontaktna oseba v tujini:
If applicable, represented by:
Kadar je to ustrezno, zastopan s strani:
Details of the injured person if that person is not the applicant:
Podatki o poškodovani osebi, če to ni prosilec:
Telephone number (including code):
Tel. (vključno s klicno številko):
(signature and/or stamp)
(podpis in/ali žig)
List of supporting documents annexed
Seznam priloženih dokazil
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT
POTRDILO O PREJEMU
(Article 7 of Directive 2004/80/EC) (*)
(člen 7 Direktive 2004/80/ES) (*)
To be sent to the assisting authority and to the applicant
Poslati organu za sodelovanje in prosilcu
The deciding authority:
Organ odločanja:
If possible, an indication of the approximate time by which a decision on the application will be made (Article 7 (c) of Directive 2004/80/EC):
Če je mogoče, približna ocena časa, v katerem je o zahtevi odločeno (člen 7(c) Direktive 2004/80/ES):
This acknowledges the receipt of the application transmitted by the assisting authority:
S tem se potrjuje prejem zahteve, posredovane s strani organa za sodelovanje:
Date of receipt:
Datum prejema:
(Signature and/or stamp):
(podpis in/ali žig):
The deciding authority may use a similar form or any other way of acknowledgement of receipt provided that it fulfils the obligations under Article 7 of the Directive.
Organ odločanja lahko uporablja podoben obrazec ali kakršen koli drug način potrditve prejema, če izpolnjuje zahteve iz člena 7 Direktive.
FORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF A DECISION ON AN APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION IN CROSS-BORDER SITUATIONS
OBRAZEC ZA POSREDOVANJE ODLOČITVE O ZAHTEVI ZA UVELJAVLJANJE ODŠKODNINE V ČEZMEJNIH PRIMERIH
(Article 10 of Directive 2004/80/EC)
(člen 10 Direktive 2004/80/ES)
Date of the decision:
Datum odločitve:
Language of the decision:
Jezik, v katerem je bila odločitev sprejeta:
Decision transmitted by:
Odločitev je posredoval:
Details of the deciding authority (transmitting authority):
Podatki o organu odločanja (organ za posredovanje):
Details of the assisting authority (receiving authority):
Podatki o organu za sodelovanje (organ za prejem):
And to:
In za:
Details of the applicant:
Podatki o prosilcu:
Name of the applicant:
Ime in priimek prosilca:
Legal representative (if applicable):
Pravni zastopnik (kadar je to ustrezno):
Details of the Decision:
Podatki o odločitvi:
This information is provided without prejudice to the text of the decision
Opomba – te informacije se posredujejo brez poseganja v besedilo odločitve
Summary:
Povzetek:
Information about the possibility to appeal, competent authority and deadlines:
Informacije o možnosti pritožbe, pristojnemu organu in rokih:
Other information or the action required by the applicant (to be completed where necessary):
Druge informacije ali dejanja, ki se zahtevajo od prosilca (izpolniti po potrebi):
authorising the Republic of Poland to prohibit on its territory the use of certain varieties of maize listed in the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, pursuant to Council Directive 2002/53/EC
o dovoljenju Republiki Poljski, da v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2002/53/ES na svojem ozemlju prepove uporabo nekaterih sort koruze iz skupnega kataloga sort poljščin
(notified under document number C(2006) 1790)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1790)
The Commission, in accordance with Article 17 of Directive 2002/53/EC, published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union, in the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, certain varieties of maize.
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17 Direktive 2002/53/ES v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije v skupnem katalogu sort poljščin objavila nekatere vrste koruze.
Pursuant to Article 16(1) of the said Directive, Member States are to ensure that, with effect from the publication referred to in Article 17, seeds of varieties accepted in accordance with that Directive or in accordance with the principles corresponding to those of that Directive are not subject to any marketing restrictions relating to the variety.
Države članice v skladu s členom 16(1) navedene direktive zagotovijo, da od objave v skladu s členom 17 za seme sort, sprejetih v skladu z navedeno direktivo ali v skladu z načeli, ki ustrezajo tistim iz Direktive, ne veljajo tržne omejitve, ki zadevajo sorto.
On 24 June 2005, the Commission received from the Republic of Poland a request for the prohibition, on the basis of Article 16(2)(b) of Directive 2002/53/EC, of the use and placing on the market of seed material from varieties of maize which are not suitable for cultivation in Poland.
Komisija je 24. junija 2005 na podlagi člena 16(2)(b) Direktive 2002/53/ES od Republike Poljske prejela zahtevek za prepoved uporabe in dajanja na trg semena sort koruze, ki niso primerne za gojenje na Poljskem.
This request followed one concerning genetically modified varieties of maize which will be the subject of a separate decision.
Ta zahtevek je sledil zahtevku za gensko spremenjene sorte koruze, ki bodo predmet druge odločbe.
On 9 December 2005, Poland sent to the Commission a list of varieties of maize it considered not suitable for cultivation in Polish conditions.
decembra 2005 je Poljska poslala Komisiji seznam sort koruze, ki po njeni oceni niso primerne za gojenje na Poljskem.
This list was completed by the Polish authorities in a letter of 9 January 2006.
Ta seznam so poljski organi dopolnili z dopisom 9. januarja 2006.
Poland requests the authorisation to prohibit all the varieties of maize of the list from its territory for an indefinite period of time.
Poljska zahteva dovoljenje, da na svojem ozemlju za neomejen čas prepove vse sorte koruze s seznama.
Having regard to the last sentence of Article 16(2)(b), which states that any such request by a Member State must be lodged before the end of the third calendar year following that of acceptance of the variety concerned in the Common catalogue, the request made by Poland in 2005 could not cover the varieties accepted in the Common catalogue before 1 January 2002.
Ob upoštevanju zadnjega stavka člena 16(2)(b), ki določa, da mora biti vsak tak zahtevek države članice vložen pred koncem tretjega koledarskega leta, ki sledi letu sprejetja zadevne sorte v skupni katalog, zahtevek Poljske v letu 2005 ne more zajemati sort, ki so bile sprejete v skupni katalog pred 1. januarjem 2002.
From the information available for the varieties concerned, it is well known that they are not suitable for cultivation in any part of Poland because of their too high maturity class which is at least of 350 FAO index or equivalent maturity class.
Iz razpoložljivih informacij za zadevne sorte je razvidno, da te sorte zaradi njihovega previsokega zrelostnega razreda, ki ustreza najmanj zrelostnemu razredu 350 indeksa FAO ali enakovrednemu zrelostnemu razredu, niso primerne za gojenje v nobenem delu Poljske.
The climatic and agricultural factors concerned provide a permanent obstacle to cultivating these varieties in Poland.
Zadevni klimatski in kmetijski dejavniki predstavljajo stalno oviro za gojenje teh sort na Poljskem.
Under these circumstances, the application of the Republic of Poland should be granted on the basis of Article 16(2)(b) for the varieties of maize listed in this decision, but refused for those varieties listed in the Common catalogue before 1 January 2002.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega se zahteva Republike Poljske odobri na podlagi člena 16(2)(b) za sorte koruze, navedene v tej odločbi, vendar se zavrne za tiste sorte, ki so bile v skupni katalog sprejete pred 1. januarjem 2002.
In order to allow the Commission to inform the other Member States and update the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species provided for in Directive 2002/53/EC, Poland should be required to inform the Commission when it makes use of the authorisation granted by this decision.
Da Komisija lahko obvesti druge države članice in posodobi skupni katalog sort poljščin iz Direktive 2002/53/ES, mora Poljska obvestiti Komisijo, kdaj bo uporabljala dovoljenje, odobreno s to odločbo.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za seme in razmnoževalni material za rastline v poljedelstvu, vrtnarstvu in gozdarstvu –
The Republic of Poland is authorised to prohibit the use, in any part of its territory, of the varieties of maize listed in the Annex to this Decision.
Republiki Poljski se odobri, da na svojem celotnem ozemlju prepove uporabo sort koruze iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
The remainder of the request by the Republic of Poland, covering varieties of maize listed in the Common catalogue before 1 January 2002, is refused.
Preostali del zahtevka Republike Poljske, ki zajema sorte koruze, sprejete v skupni katalog pred 1. januarjem 2002, se zavrne.
In order to allow the Commission to inform the other Member States, the Republic of Poland shall notify the Commission of the date from which it makes use of the authorisation given under Article 1.
Da Komisija lahko obvesti druge države članice, mora Republika Poljska Komisiji sporočiti datum, od katerega uporablja dovoljenje iz člena 1.
Directive as amended by Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 1).
amending Decision 2001/171/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for the purpose of prolonging the validity of the conditions for a derogation for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC
o spremembi Odločbe 2001/171/ES za podaljšanje veljavnosti pogojev za odstopanje pri stekleni embalaži glede mejnih koncentracij težkih kovin, določenih v Direktivi 94/62/ES
(notified under document number C(2006) 1823)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1823)
Having regard to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste [1], and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 94/62/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 1994 o embalaži in odpadni embalaži [1], in zlasti člena 11(3) Direktive,
The derogation laid down in Commission Decision 2001/171/EC [2] for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC expires on 30 June 2006.
Odstopanje iz Odločbe Komisije 2001/171/ES z dne 19. februarja 2001 [2] pri stekleni embalaži glede mejnih koncentracij težkih kovin, določenih v Direktivi 94/62/ES, preneha veljati 30. junija 2006.
The compliance throughout the Community with the 100 ppm limit value established in Article 11(1) of Directive 94/62/EC could only be achieved through a reduction of the glass recycling rate; however, such a reduction is not desirable from an environmental point of view.
Usklajenost v Skupnosti z mejno vrednostjo 100 ppm iz člena 11(1) Direktive 94/62/ES je mogoče doseči le z zmanjšanjem deleža recikliranega stekla, vendar takšno zmanjšanje iz vidika varstva okolja ni zaželjeno.
The validity of Decision 2001/171/EC should therefore be prolonged without any further expiry date.
Veljavnost Odločbe 2001/171/ES je zato treba podaljšati brez določitve datuma poteka veljavnosti.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established pursuant to Article 21 of Directive 94/62/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 21 Direktive 94/62/ES –
Article 6 of Decision 2001/171/EC is deleted.
Člen 6 Odločbe 2001/171/ES se razveljavi.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2005/20/EC (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 17).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2005/20/ES (UL L 70, 16.3.2005, str. 17).
OJ L 62, 2.3.2001, p. 20.
UL L 62, 2.3.2001, str. 20.
giving notice to Germany, in accordance with Article 104(9) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, to take measures for the deficit reduction judged necessary in order to remedy the situation of excessive deficit
o pozivu Nemčiji v skladu s členom 104(9) Pogodbe ES, naj sprejme ukrepe za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, ki so po mnenju Sveta potrebni za odpravo stanja čezmernega primanjkljaja
Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission pursuant to Article 104(9) of the Treaty,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije v skladu s členom 104(9) Pogodbe,
The Resolution of the Amsterdam European Council of 17 June 1997 on the Stability and Growth Pact [2] solemnly invites all parties, namely the Member States, the Council and the Commission, to implement the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact in a strict and timely manner.
Resolucija Evropskega sveta iz Amsterdama o Paktu stabilnosti in rasti z dne 17. junija 1997 [2] slovesno poziva vse strani, namreč države članice, Svet in Komisijo, naj natančno in pravočasno izvajajo Pogodbo in Pakt stabilnosti in rasti.
By Decision 2003/89/EC [3], the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty, that an excessive deficit existed in Germany.
V Odločbi 2003/89/ES [3] je Svet v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe odločil, da v Nemčiji obstaja čezmeren primanjkljaj.
In accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, the Council addressed a recommendation to Germany on 21 January 2003, calling on Germany to bring the excessive deficit to an end as rapidly as possible and by 2004 at the latest.
Svet je 21. januarja 2003 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 naslovil na Nemčijo priporočilo s pozivom, naj Nemčija čimprej in najpozneje do leta 2004 odpravi čezmerni primanjkljaj.
The recommendation was made public.
Priporočilo je bilo objavljeno.
As stated in the Commission Communication of 14 December 2004, with which the Council concurred on 18 January 2005, in view of the unique circumstances created by the Council conclusions of 25 November 2003 and of the ruling of the European Court of Justice of 13 July 2004, the year 2005 should be considered to be the relevant deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit.
Kakor je navedeno v Sporočilu Komisije z dne 14. decembra 2004, s katerim se je Svet strinjal dne 18. januarja 2005, je treba glede na edinstvene okoliščine, ki so nastale zaradi sklepov Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2003, in glede na sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. julija 2004 kot ustrezni rok za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja upoštevati leto 2005.
The general government deficit in Germany has been well above the 3 %-of-GDP Treaty reference value since 2002.
Od leta 2002 naprej je bil javnofinančni primanjkljaj v Nemčiji precej nad referenčno stopnjo Pogodbe, ki znaša 3 % BDP.
The debt-to-GDP ratio has increased from below the 60 % of GDP Treaty reference value in 2001 to a projected 69 % of GDP in 2006.
Delež dolga glede na BDP je zrasel z vrednosti, nižje od 60 % BDP, ki je referenčna vrednost iz Pogodbe v letu 2001, na predvidenih 69 % BDP v letu 2006.
According to data provided by Eurostat, the general government deficit in Germany amounted to 3,3 % of GDP in 2005.
Po podatkih Eurostata je javnofinančni primanjkljaj v Nemčiji leta 2005 znašal 3,3 % BDP.
These data, pending a further assessment of their quality, are based upon a provisional notification from Germany pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [4], submitted to the Commission on 24 February 2006.
Ti podatki do nadaljnje ocene njihove kakovosti temeljijo na začasni priglasitvi Nemčije v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 3605/93 z dne 22. novembra 1993 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [4], ki je bila predložena Komisiji dne 24. februarja 2006.
Additionally, on the basis of information currently available, taking into account the budgetary plans adopted so far by the German government, the general government deficit will also remain above the Treaty reference value in 2006, which confirms that the excessive deficit has not been corrected.
Poleg tega bo na podlagi trenutno razpoložljivih podatkov ob upoštevanju proračunskih načrtov, ki jih je doslej sprejela nemška vlada, javnofinančni primanjkljaj v letu 2006 še naprej ostajal nad referenčno vrednostjo Pogodbe, kar potrjuje, da se primanjkljaj ni zmanjšal.
According to Article 10(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, if actual data pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 indicate that an excessive deficit has not been corrected by a participating Member State within the time limits specified in a recommendation issued under Article 104(7) of the Treaty, the Council shall immediately take a decision under Article 104(9) of the Treaty giving notice to the Member State to take, within a specified time limit, measures for the deficit reduction which is judged necessary by the Council in order to remedy the situation.
V skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 in če dejanski podatki v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 3605/93 kažejo, da sodelujoča država članica ni zmanjšala čezmernega primanjkljaja v rokih, predpisanih v priporočilu iz člena 104(7) Pogodbe, se Svet nemudoma v skladu s členom 104(9) Pogodbe odloči za poziv državi članici, naj v določenem roku sprejme ukrepe za zmanjšanje primanjkljaja, ki so po mnenju Sveta potrebni za izboljšanje stanja.
The Commission services’ autumn 2005 forecast projected the 2005 deficit at 3,9 % of GDP [5].
Po projekcijah napovedi služb Komisije iz jeseni 2005 je primanjkljaj leta 2005 znašal 3,9 % BDP [5].
On a no-policy-change basis, the Commission services’ forecast projected the deficit at 3,7 % and 3,3 % of GDP in 2006 and 2007 respectively.
Po predvidevanjih služb Komisije bi primanjkljaj ob nespremenjenih politikah znašal 3,7 % BDP leta 2006 in 3,3 % leta 2007.