natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Instead of examining even more closely the ex ante decision of Kronoply, the Commission considers it more appropriate to rely on the facts.
Namesto da bi še naprej obravnavala predhodno odločitev podjetja Kronoply, Komisija meni, da se je bolj smiselno opirati na dejstva.
It is apparent that Kronoply decided to invest and continued its operations after having been granted an aid intensity of only 31,5%.
Jasno je, da se je Kronoply odločil za naložbo in nadaljeval z dejavnostmi še po tem, ko je bila podjetju odobrena intenzivnost pomoči zgolj v višini 31,5 odstotkov.
The investment project was completed as originally planned.
Naložbeni projekt je bil dokončan po prvotnem načrtu.
Kronoply did not scale down the investment project in response to the lower aid intensity.
Kronoply svojega naložbenega projekta kljub zmanjšani intenzivnosti pomoči ni uskladil.
Whether further aid is granted or not, Kronoply will not change its behaviour: There is no indication that further aid will induce it to increase production or enlarge its production facilities.
Kronoply svojega ravnanja ne bo spremenil, ne glede na to, ali bo podjetje prejelo nadaljnjo pomoč ali ne: niti en oporna točka ne nakazuje, da bo nadaljnja pomoč podjetje Kronoply spodbudila k povečanju proizvodnje ali širitvi proizvodnih obratov.
As the investments have already been carried out, there is also no reason to assume that Kronoply will shut down production if it does not receive any more aid.
Ker so naložbe že izvedene, ni razloga za skrb, da bi Kronoply ustavil proizvodnjo, tudi če ne prejme nobene nadaljnje pomoči.
Accordingly, the Commission has come to the conclusion that granting further aid of 3,5% will not provide any incentive effect.
Komisija je prišla do zaključka, da dodelitev pomoči v višini nadaljnjih 3,5 odstotkov ne bi imela spodbujevalnega učinka.
As stated in the decision to initiate the procedure, for aid measures to help promote the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas within the meaning of Article 87(3)(a) and (c) of the EC Treaty, they must act as an incentive.
Kot je že pojasnjeno v sklepu o sprožitvi postopka, morajo pomoči učinkovati kot spodbude, če naj bi prispevale k pospešitvi gospodarskega razvoja določene gospodarske panoge ali gospodarskega območja v smislu člena 87(3)(a) in 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
If, as in the case in point, the investments have already been carried out, the aid provides no such incentive and does not lead to new investment or job creation.
Če je naložba, kot v tem primeru, že izvedena, pomoč ne učinkuje kot spodbuda in ne vodi k novim naložbam ali k odpiranju novih delovnih mest.
Therefore the Commission is not in a position to justify the aid because of an increase in new investment or job creation within the meaning of Article 87(3)(a) and (c).
Zato Komisija pomoči ne more upravičiti z zvišanjem novih naložb ali z odpiranjem novih delovnih mest v smislu člena 87(3)(a) in 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
It again concludes that the additional aid of €3936947 constitutes operating aid.
Komisija je zopet prišla do zaključka, da je dodatna pomoč v višini 3936947 EUR pomoč za tekoče poslovanje.
Necessity
Nujnost pomoči
As regards the statements in the decision to initiate the procedure, the Commission considers that the principle of necessity derives directly from the logic of state aid control.
Glede na pojasnila v sklepu o sprožitvi postopka Komisija zastopa stališče, da načelo nujnosti izhaja neposredno iz koncepta nadzora državnih pomoči.
It can declare aid compatible with Articles 87(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty only if it can establish that the aid contributes to the attainment of one of the objectives specified, something which, under normal market conditions, the recipient firms would not achieve by their own actions.
Komisija lahko pomoč kot združljivo s členoma 87(2) in 87(3) označi le v primeru, ko lahko potrdi, da pomoč pripomore k uresničitvi enega od omenjenih ciljev, katerih pa upravičeno podjetje v normalnih tržnih pogojih s svojimi ukrepi ne bi moglo doseči.
This is in accordance with the Commission's standard practice, as confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Philip Morris [13].
To je v skladu z običajno prakso Komisije, ki jo je zlasti v svoji sodbi z dne 17. septembra 1980 v pravni zadevi 730/79 (Phillip Morris/Komisija) [13] potrdilo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
As explained in paragraphs 26 to 35, the planned aid does not provide any incentive for new investment or job creation.
Kot je navedeno v odstavkih 26 do 35, načrtovana pomoč ne spodbuja nove naložbe ali odpiranja novih delovnih mest.
It does not require from the recipient any quid pro quo or any contribution to an objective of common interest.
Od prejemnika pomoči ne zahteva niti povračila niti prispevka k cilju skupnega interesa.
Therefore, it is operating aid which covers current costs that Kronoply itself must normally bear.
Zato gre v tem primeru za pomoč za tekoče poslovanje z namenom pokritja tekočih stroškov, ki bi jih sicer podjetje Kronoply moralo pokriti samo.
Point 4.15 of the regional aid guidelines normally prohibits operating aid.
Točka 4.15 Smernic o regionalni pomoči običajno prepoveduje pomoč za tekoče poslovanje.
Exceptionally, however, such aid may be granted in regions eligible under the derogation in Article 87(3)(a) provided that (i) it is justified in terms of its contribution to regional development and its nature and (ii) its level is proportional to the handicaps it seeks to alleviate.
Tovrstne pomoči pa je mogoče izjemoma dodeliti v območjih, ki spadajo v področje uporabe člena 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, če so i) upravičene zaradi svojega prispevka k regionalnem razvoju in če so ii) upravičene po svoji vrsti in je njihova višina sorazmerno primerna glede na omejitve.
Germany has not demonstrated the existence of any handicaps or shown how the additional aid is to contribute to regional development.
Nemčija ni predložila podatkov o morebitnih omejitvah niti ni prikazala, kako naj bi nadaljnja pomoč prispevala k regionalnem razvoju.
It is evident from the facts that any further aid is not necessary because Kronoply decided to continue its operations even after only the lower aid intensity of 31,5% was approved.
Iz dejstev izhaja, da nadaljnja pomoč ni nujna, saj se je podjetje Kronoply odločilo, da bo nadaljevalo s svojo dejavnostjo, potem ko je bila odobrena nižja intenzivnost pomoči v višini 31,5 odstotkov.
This means that Kronoply runs a viable economic operation or that, in any event, it does not need any more aid.
To pomeni, je poslovanje podjetja rentabilno ali da podjetje vsekakor ni odvisno od nadaljnjih pomoči.
At this stage, any further aid would provide a windfall profit for Kronoply.
Vsaka nadaljnja pomoč v tej fazi bi bila za Kronoply nepričakovana pridobitev.
The Commission concludes therefore that, in the present case, the aid is also not compatible with Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty because it is not necessary for regional development.
Komisija je zato prišla do zaključka, da pomoč v tem primeru tudi zaradi tega ni združljiva s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, ker ni nujna za regionalni razvoj.
Lastly, it will be examined whether the derogations in Article 87(2) and (3) are applicable:
V zaključku se prouči, ali so izjeme iz določb členov 87(2) in 87(3) Pogodbe ES uporabne pri pomoči:
The derogations in Article 87(2), which concern aid of a social character granted to individual consumers, aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences and aid granted to compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by the division of Germany, do not apply in this case.
Izjeme iz določb člena 87(2) Pogodbe ES glede pomoči socialne vrste za posamezne porabnike, za odstranjevanje škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne katastrofe, ali za premagovanje delitve Nemčije se v tem primeru ne uporabljajo.
The aid cannot be considered as aid for a project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the German economy, as provided for by Article 87(3)(b).
V skladu s členom 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES pomoči tudi ne moremo označiti kot program skupnega evropskega interesa ali za odpravo znatnih motenj v gospodarskem življenju Nemčije.
Nor does it have as its object the promotion of culture and heritage conservation, as provided for by Article 87(3)(d).
Prav tako ni določena za pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanje kulturne dediščine v skladu s členom 87(3)(d) Pogodbe ES.
Article 87(3)(c) provides for the approval of aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic regions, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Člen 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES predvideva dodelitev pomoči za pospeševanje razvoja določene gospodarske panoge ali gospodarskega območja, dokler le-ta ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev tako, da so v nasprotju s skupnim interesom.
As the aid has been found to be incompatible with Article 87(3)(a) because it neither provides an incentive effect nor is necessary, the aid cannot be declared compatible with Article 87(3)(c) for the same reasons.
Ker je bila pomoč zaradi pomanjkanja spodbujevalnega učinka in nujnosti označena kot nezdružljiva s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES, jo lahko iz istih razlogov označimo kot nezdružljivo s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission concludes that the notified aid constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je prišla do zaključka, da priglašena pomoč predstavlja državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
As the aid neither provides any incentive effect nor is necessary, none of the derogations in Article 87(2) or (3) apply.
Ker pomoč ne učinkuje kot spodbuda niti ni nujna, ni uporabna nobena izjema iz določb členov 87(2) in 87(3) Pogodbe ES.
The aid therefore constitutes incompatible operating aid and may not be implemented,
Pomoč je torej nedopustna pomoč za tekoče poslovanje in se je ne sme dodeliti –
The state aid which, according to notification N 609/2003, Germany is planning to implement for Kronoply, amounting to €3936947, is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 3936947 EUR, ki jo je Nemčija v skladu s priglasitvijo N 609/2003 namerava dodeliti podjetju Kronoply GmbH, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may accordingly not be implemented.
Iz tega razloga se državna pomoč ne sme dodeliti.
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Nemčija obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe.
OJ C 258, 20.10.2004, p. 12.
UL C 258, 20.10.2004, str. 12.
OSB is a wooden panel used in construction and consisting of three layers of ‘strands’ made primarily of pine.
OSB je material v obliki plošč za gradnjo, ki je sestavljen iz treh plasti t.i.
It is used in timber frame construction, in particular for the refurbishment and restoration of old buildings, in the prefabricated building industry and in the packaging industry.
„Strands“ (dolgih lesnih vlaken) pretežno iz borovine. OSB se uporablja pri gradnji lesenih okvirjev in zlasti pri sanaciji in obnovi starih stavb, pri gradnji montažnih hiš in pri industriji embalaže.
Consisting of investment aid in the form of (i) a non-repayable grant amounting to €19,92 million under the 29th general plan of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic structures and (ii) an investment allowance of €15,48 million under the Investment Allowance Law 1999.
Obstoječa iz investicijske pomoči v obliki nepovratnih sredstev v višini 19,92 milijona EUR, ki je bila izplačana na podlagi 29. okvirnega načrta naloge Skupnosti „Izboljšanje območnih gospodarskih struktur“, kot tudi iz investicijskega dodatka na podlagi Zakona o investicijskem dodatku iz leta 1999 v višini 15,48 milijona EUR.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1; as amended by the 2004 Acts of Accession.
UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1, kakor je bila spremenjena z Akti o pristopu 2004.
Case T-130/02 Kronoply v Commission [2003] ECR II-4857.
PSES, II-4857.
See footnote 7, paragraph 50.
Glej opombo 7, odstavek 50.
Case T-212/00 Nuove Industrie Molisane Srl v Commission [2002] ECR II-347, paragraph 47.
PSES, II-347, odstavek 47.
See footnote 9, paragraph 41.
Glej opombo 9, odstavek 41.
Case C-288/96 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-8237, paragraph 48.
PSES, I-8237, odstavek 48.
Case 730/79 Philip Morris v Commission [1980] ECR 2671.
PSES, str. 2671.
Point 4.2. of the Guidelines on national regional aid [11] (‘regional aid guidelines’) indicates how to test whether there is an incentive. It reads as follows: ‘In addition, aid schemes must lay down that an application for aid must be submitted before work is started on the projects.’ Kronoply fulfilled this requirement by applying to the national authorities for aid before the start of the project.
V točki 4.2 Smernic o državni regionalni pomoči [11] (v nadaljevanju „Smernice o regionalni pomoči“) je navedeno, kako je mogoče preveriti, ali obstaja spodbuda: „Poleg tega morajo sheme pomoči predvideti, da se vloga za pomoč vloži pred začetkom izvajanja projekta.“ Z vlogo za pomoč pri zveznih organih pred začetkom projekta je Kronoply ta pogoj izpolnil.
amending Decision 2005/648/EC concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/648/ES o zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo v Bolgariji
(notified under document number C(2006) 893)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 893)
Newcastle disease is a highly contagious viral disease in poultry and birds and there is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
Atipična kokošja kuga je zelo nalezljiva virusna bolezen pri perutnini in pticah, zato obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni lahko prenese prek mednarodne trgovine z živo perutnino in perutninskimi proizvodi.
Commission Decision 2005/648/EC of 8 September 2005 concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Bulgaria [3] was adopted following an outbreak of Newcastle disease in the administrative region of Vratsa.
Po izbruhu atipične kokošje kuge v upravnem okraju Vratsa je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2005/648/ES z dne 8. septembra 2005 o zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo v Bolgariji [3].
That Decision suspends the importation of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game and hatching eggs, fresh meat and meat preparations and meat products from these species.
Navedena odločba začasno ustavlja uvoz žive perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi in gojene pernate divjadi ter valilnih jajc, svežega mesa in mesnih pripravkov ter mesnih proizvodov iz teh vrst.
On 23 January 2006 Bulgaria confirmed an outbreak of Newcastle disease in the administrative district of Blagoevgrad in Bulgaria.
Dne 23. januarja 2006 je Bolgarija potrdila izbruh atipične kokošje kuge v upravnem okraju Blagoevgrad v Bolgariji.
It is therefore appropriate to limit the suspension of imports to those regions and to prolong the period of application of Decision 2005/648/EC.
Zato je primerno omejiti začasno ustavitev uvoza na ta okraja in podaljšati obdobje uporabe Odločbe 2005/648/ES.
The Annex to Decision 2005/648/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo k Odločbi 2005/648/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In order to authorise imports of meat products subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to inactivate any possible virus in the meat, it is necessary to specify the required treatment for poultry meat in the health certificates drawn up in accordance with Annexes III and IV to Commission Decision 2005/432/EC [4].
Da se omogoči uvoz mesnih proizvodov, ki so bili toplotno obdelani tako, da se inaktivira morebitni virus v mesu, je treba na veterinarskih spričevalih, določenih v skladu s prilogama III in IV k Odločbi Komisije 2005/432/ES [4], navesti zahtevano obdelavo za perutninsko meso.
Decision 2005/648/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2005/648/ES se spremeni:
in Article 5 the date ‘23 August 2006’ is replaced by ‘23 January 2007’;
V členu 5 se datum „23. avgusta 2006“ nadomesti s „23. januarja 2007.“
the following paragraphs are added to Article 3:
Členu 3 se dodajo naslednji odstavki:
The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be specified in point 9.1 column B in the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out in Annex III to Decision 2005/432/EC, and the following wording shall be added to that certificate:
Posebna obdelava, ki je bila uporabljena v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, se navede v točki 9.1, stolpec B, veterinarskega spričevala, sestavljenega v skladu z vzorcem iz Priloge III k Odločbi 2005/432/ES, navedenemu spričevalu pa se doda naslednje besedilo:
“Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2005/648/EC”.
‚Mesni proizvodi, obdelani v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2005/648/ES‘.
The specific treatment applied in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article shall be certified by adding the following wording to the veterinary certificate drawn up in accordance with the model set out Annex IV to Decision 2005/432/EC:
Posebna obdelava, ki je bila uporabljena v skladu z odstavkom 3 tega člena, se potrdi tako, da se veterinarskemu spričevalu, sestavljenemu v skladu z vzorcem iz Priloge IV k Odločbi 2005/432/ES, doda naslednje besedilo:
“Meat products treated in accordance with Commission Decision 2005/648/EC” ’;
‚Mesni proizvodi, obdelani v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2005/648/ES‘.“
the Annex is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
Administrative district of Blagoevgrad
Upravni okraj Blagoevgrad,
Administrative district of Vratsa’
Upravni okraj Vratsa.“
Taking account of the current epidemiology situation in Bulgaria in relation to Newcastle disease and the fact that that country has applied certain disease control measures and has sent further information on the disease situation to the Commission.
Upoštevati je treba trenutno epidemiološko stanje v Bolgariji v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo in dejstvo, da je država izvajala nekatere ukrepe nadzora bolezni in je Komisiji poslala nadaljnje podatke o stanju bolezni.
On the basis of this information, it appears that the situation in Bulgaria, except for the regions of Vratsa and Blagoevgrad is still satisfactory.
Na podlagi teh podatkov se zdi stanje v Bolgariji še vedno zadovoljivo, z izjemo okrajev Vratsa in Blagoevgrad.
concerning protection measures in relation to Newcastle disease in Romania
o zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z atipično kokošjo kugo v Romuniji
(notified under document number C(2006) 892)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 892)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC [1], and in particular Article 18 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS in 90/675/EGS [1], ter zlasti člena 18 Direktive,
Romania has notified to the Commission the occurrence of outbreaks of Newcastle disease on its territory.
Romunija je obvestila Komisijo o izbruhih atipične kokošje kuge na njenem ozemlju.
In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate to take measures in relation to imports of live poultry, ratites, farmed and wild feathered game birds and hatching eggs of these species from Romania.
Glede na tveganje prenosa bolezni na živali v Skupnosti je zato ustrezno, da se uvedejo ukrepi v zvezi z uvozom žive perutnine, ratitov, pernate divjadi in gojene pernate divjadi ter valilnih jajc teh vrst iz Romunije.
Romania has communicated further information on the disease situation and asked for regionalisation to suspend importation into the Community from those regions affected by the disease only, since the situation in the rest of the country appears to be satisfactory.
Romunija je posredovala nadaljnje podatke o stanju bolezni in zaprosila za regionalizacijo, ki bi začasno ustavila uvoz v Skupnost samo iz tistih regij, ki jih je prizadela bolezen, saj je stanje v drugih delih države zadovoljivo.
The information available at present gives the possibility to reduce the protection measures to specific regions.
Podatki, ki so trenutno na voljo, omogočajo omejitev zaščitnih ukrepov na določene regije.
The information presented to the Commission shows that the disease was suspected in Romania for the first time on 22 November 2005.
Podatki, ki so bili predstavljeni Komisiji, kažejo, da se je sum na bolezen v Romuniji prvič pojavil 22. novembra 2005.
Therefore, taking into account the incubation period of the disease, the importation into the Community from the affected regions in Romania should be suspended for fresh meat of poultry, ratites and wild and farmed feathered game, meat preparations and meat products consisting of, or containing meat of those species, obtained from birds slaughtered after 1 October 2005.
Zato je treba, ob upoštevanju inkubacijske dobe bolezni, iz prizadetih regij v Romuniji v Skupnost začasno ustaviti uvoz sveže perutnine, mesa ratitov ter pernate divjadi in gojene pernate divjadi, mesnih pripravkov in mesnih proizvodov, ki sestojijo iz ali vsebujejo meso tistih vrst, pridobljeno iz ptic, zaklanih po 1. oktobru 2005.
Commission Decision 2005/432/EC of 3 June 2005 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of meat products for human consumption from third countries and repealing Decisions 97/41/EC, 97/221/EC and 97/222/EC [3] lays down the list of third countries or parts thereof from which meat products are authorised for importation into the Community and establishes treatment regimes for meat products considered effective in inactivating certain pathogens.
Odločba Komisije 2005/432/ES z dne 3. junija 2005 o pogojih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali in javnozdravstvenim varstvom ter vzorcih spričeval za uvoz mesnih izdelkov za prehrano ljudi iz tretjih držav in o razveljavitvi odločb 97/41/ES, 97/221/ES in 97/222/ES [3] določa seznam tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih države članice lahko odobrijo uvoz mesnih izdelkov, in predpisuje režime obdelave, ki veljajo za učinkovite pri inaktivaciji nekaterih patogenov.
In order to prevent the risk of disease transmission via the products covered by Decision 2005/432/EC, appropiate treatment should be applied depending on the health status of the country of origin and the species the product is obtained from.
Da se prepreči tveganje za prenos bolezni s proizvodi, ki so zajeti v Odločbi 2005/432/ES, je treba uporabiti primerno obdelavo, ki je odvisna od zdravstvenega stanja v državi porekla in vrst, iz katerih je pridobljen proizvod.
It is therefore appropriate that imports of poultry meat products, originating from the affected regions in Romania and treated to a temperature of at least 70 °C throughout the product, should continue to be authorised for importation into the Community.
Zato je primerno, da se še naprej dovoli uvoz v Skupnost za proizvode iz mesa pernate divjadi s poreklom iz prizadetih regij v Romuniji, ki so bili obdelani pri temperaturi najmanj 70 °C v celotnem proizvodu.
In order to authorise imports of meat products subjected to a heat treatment sufficient to inactivate any possible virus in the meat, it is necessary to specify the required treatment for poultry meat in the health certificates drawn up in accordance with Annexes III and IV to Decision 2005/432/EC.
Da se omogoči uvoz mesnih izdelkov, ki so bili toplotno obdelani tako, da se inaktivira morebitni virus v mesu, je treba na veterinarskih spričevalih, sestavljenih v skladu s prilogama III in IV k Odločbi 2005/432/ES, navesti zahtevano obdelavo za meso pernate divjadi.