natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sbírka zákonů České Republiky No 75, 20.5.2005, p. 3928.
Sbírka zákonů České Republiky št. 75, 20.5.2005, str. 3928.
OJ C 29, 4.2.2006, p. 8.
UL C 29, 4.2.2006, str. 8.
Čupr, P., Sáňka, M., Holoubek, I.: Study to assess risks to the environment and health resulting from the use of phosphate fertilisers containing cadmium, November 2005; RECETOX Research Centre for Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Masaryk University; TOCOEN REPORT No 285. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizers/cadmium/sctee.pdf
Čupr, P., Sáňka, M., Holoubek, I.: Študija za ocenitev tveganja za okolje in zdravje zaradi uporabe fosfatnih gnojil, ki vsebujejo kadmij, november 2005; Raziskovalni center za okoljsko kemijo in ekotoksikologijo RECETOX, Univerza Masaryk; POROČILO TOCOEN št. 285 http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizers/cadmium/sctee.pdf
ERM, study on data requirements and programme for data production and gathering to support a future evaluation of the risks to health and the environment for cadmium in fertilisers, March 1999; See also ERM, study to establish a programme of detailed procedures for the assessment of risks to health and the environment from cadmium in fertilisers, February 2000.
ERM, Študija o zahtevah po podatkih in programu za pripravo in zbiranje podatkov v podporo prihodnji oceni tveganja, ki ga za zdravje in okolje predstavlja kadmij v gnojilih, marec 1999; glej tudi ERM, Študija za oblikovanje programa podrobnih postopkov za oceno tveganja, ki ga za zdravje in okolje predstavlja kadmij v gnojilih, februar 2000.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizers/cadmium/reports_en.htm
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizer/cadmium/reports_en.htm
ERM, analysis and conclusions from Member States' assessment of the risk to health and the environment from Cadmium in fertilisers, October 2001.
ERM, analiza in ugotovitve iz ocen tveganja, ki ga za zdravje in okolje predstavlja kadmij v gnojilih, izvedenih v državah članicah, oktober 2001.
Renamed SCHER (Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks).
Preimenovan SCHER (Znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja).
CSTEE's opinion on Member State assessments of the risk to health and the environment from cadmium in fertilisers.
Mnenje CSTEE o ocenah tveganja za zdravje in okolje zaradi kadmija v gnojilih, ki so jih pripravile države članice.
Opinion expressed at the 33rd CSTEE Plenary meeting, Brussels, 24 September 2002. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizers/cadmium/sctee.pdf
Mnenje je bilo izraženo na 33. plenarnem zasedanju CSTEE v Bruslju, 24. septembra 2002. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/fertilizers/cadmium/sctee.pdf
Pore water means that part of the water contained in the soil which is maintained by capillarity between the solid particles of the soil.
Porna voda je tisti del vode v zemlji, ki ga ohranja kapilarnost med trdnimi delci zemlje.
PNEC: Predictable No-Effect Concentration.
PKBU: Predvidena koncentracija brez učinka.
The risk-assessment methodology, outlined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 and further detailed in the Technical Guidance Document on risk assessment for new and existing substances, consists in calculating the ratios between the Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) of a given substance and the Predicted No-Effect Concentration (PNEC) of that substance in any specific environmental compartment.
Metodologija za oceno tveganja, določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1488/94 in podrobneje opisana v Tehničnem usmeritvenem dokumentu o oceni tveganja za nove in obstoječe snovi, vsebuje izračun razmerja med predvideno koncentracijo dane snovi v okolju (PKO) in predvideno koncentracijo brez učinka (PKBU) omenjene snovi v vsakem posameznem ekosistemu.
Risk is quantified by the PEC/PNEC ratio, a quantity referred to in the Czech report as the hazard index.
Tveganje je količinsko opredeljeno z razmerjem PKO/PKBU, s količino, ki je v češkem poročilu imenovana kazalnik tveganja.
A PEC/PNEC ratio below 1 indicates no risk to the environment, whereas a ratio of 1 or greater indicates a situation of real or potential risk; the larger the value, the greater the magnitude of the effect.
Razmerje PKO/PKBU pod 1 kaže, da ni tveganja za okolje, medtem ko razmerje 1 ali več kaže na realno ali potencialno tveganje; večja kot je vrednost, večji je učinek.
Proportionate risk management measures are indicated in cases where the PEC/PNEC ratio is greater than 1.
Sorazmerni ukrepi za obvladovanje tveganja so navedeni v primerih, ko je razmerje PKO/PKBU večje od 1.
of 30 May 2006
z dne 30. maja 2006
amending Decision 2006/346/EC concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany
o spremembi Odločbe 2006/346/ES o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v Nemčiji
(notified under document number C(2006) 2058)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2058)
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market [1], and in particular Article 10(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/425/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o veterinarskih in zootehničnih pregledih, ki se zaradi vzpostavitve notranjega trga izvajajo v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti na nekaterih živih živalih in proizvodih [1], in zlasti člena 10(4) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2001/89/EC of 23 October 2001 on Community measures for the control of classical swine fever [2] and in particular Article 11(1)(f) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o ukrepih Skupnosti za nadzor nad klasično prašičjo kugo [2] in zlasti člena 11(1)(f) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [3], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [3], in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 4(3) Direktive,
Following outbreaks of classical swine fever in Germany, protection and surveillance zones were immediately established around outbreak sites in Germany in accordance with Article 9(1) of Directive 2001/89/EC.
Po izbruhu klasične prašičje kuge v Nemčiji so bila v skladu s členom 9(1) Direktive 2001/89/ES okoli krajev izbruha v Nemčiji takoj vzpostavljena okužena in ogrožena območja.
In addition, Commission Decision 2006/346/EC of 15 May 2006 concerning certain protection measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany and repealing Decision 2006/274/EC [4] was adopted in order to maintain and extend the measures taken by Germany pursuant to Directive 2001/89/EC.
Poleg tega je bila sprejeta Odločba Komisije 2006/346/ES z dne 15. maja 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v Nemčiji in razveljavitvi Odločbe 2006/274/ES [4], da se ohranijo in razširijo ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Nemčija v skladu z Direktivo 2001/89/ES.
The provisions for the use of a health marking on fresh meat are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption [5].
Določbe o uporabi oznak zdravstvene ustreznosti na svežem mesu predpisuje Uredba (ES) št. 854/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o določitvi posebnih predpisov za organizacijo uradnega nadzora proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [5].
However, pursuant to Council Directive 2001/89/EC, that health mark may not be used for marking the fresh meat from pigs originating from a holding located in a surveillance zone.
Vendar se na podlagi Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES navedena oznaka zdravstvene ustreznosti ne sme uporabljati za označevanje svežega mesa prašičev, ki izvirajo z gospodarstva znotraj ogroženega območja.
Pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive 2002/99/EC, Germany has submitted a request for a derogation concerning the health marking provided for in Directive 2001/89/EC and the use of pigmeat from pigs kept on holdings situated in the surveillance zones established in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and slaughtered, subject to a specific authorisation issued by the competent authority.
Nemčija je na podlagi člena 4(3) Direktive 2002/99/ES predložila zahtevo po odstopanju v zvezi z oznakami zdravstvene ustreznosti iz Direktive 2001/89/ES in uporabo mesa prašičev z gospodarstev znotraj ogroženih območij v zvezni deželi Severno Porenje-Vestfalija, za katerih zakol je bilo potrebno posebno dovoljenje pristojnega organa.
Based on the epidemiological situation as regards classical swine fever in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and the pattern of the earlier spread of the disease, the risk of the spread of that disease should not be affected by applying the health marking, laid down in Regulation (EC) No 854/2004, on fresh meat from pigs from a surveillance zone located in certain areas of North Rhine-Westphalia in accordance with the conditions and testing of the pigs laid down in this Decision.
Epidemiološko stanje v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v zvezni deželi Severno Porenje-Vestfalija in vzorec prejšnjega širjenja bolezni kažeta, da na nevarnost širjenja navedene bolezni ne bi smelo vplivati označevanje zdravstvene ustreznosti, določeno z Uredbo (ES) št. 854/2004, na svežem mesu prašičev z ogroženih območij v nekaterih predelih Severnega Porenja-Vestfalije, ki se uporablja v skladu s pogoji in testiranjem prašičev, določenih s to direktivo.
It may also be considered that protection from the risk of the spread of that disease should not be affected by marketing the fresh meat without further processing or treatment under those conditions.
Prav tako se lahko šteje, da na zaščito pred nevarnostjo širjenja navedene bolezni ne bi smelo vplivati trženje svežega mesa v navedenih pogojih brez nadaljnje predelave ali obdelave.
Based on the information provided by Germany, it is appropriate to review protective measures relating to classical swine fever in Germany as regards the duration of the measures in the protection and surveillance zones established around an outbreak site pursuant to Directive 2001/89/EC.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je posredovala Nemčija, je primerno pregledati zaščitne ukrepe v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v Nemčiji glede trajanja ukrepov na okuženih in ogroženih območjih, vzpostavljenih okoli kraja izbruha na podlagi Direktive 2001/89/ES.
It is also necessary to reintroduce the prohibition for Member States to send pigs to slaughterhouses in the areas of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany where outbreaks of classical swine fever were notified that was revoked by Decision 2006/346/EC.
Prav tako je potrebno znova uvesti prepoved za države članice, ki je bila preklicana z Direktivo 2006/346/ES, glede pošiljanja prašičev v klavnice na območjih Severnega Porenja in Vestfalije v Nemčiji, kjer so bili prijavljeni izbruhi klasične prašičje kuge.
Decision 2006/346/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2006/346/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Decision 2006/346/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2006/346/ES se spremeni:
Article 1 is replaced by the following:
člen 1 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
Germany shall ensure that no pigs are dispatched to other Member States and to third countries from:
Nemčija zagotovi, da v druge države članice in v tretje države ne pošilja prašičev:
the areas listed in Annex I;
z območij, naštetih v Prilogi I;
holdings on its territory located outside the areas listed in Annex I that have received pigs since 15 January 2006 from a holding located in North Rhine-Westphalia.’
z gospodarstev zunaj območij iz Priloge I, ki so po 15. januarju 2006 prejela prašiče z gospodarstva v Severnem Porenju-Vestfaliji.“
The following Article 3a is inserted:
Vstavi se člen 3a:
By way of derogation from the fourth indent of Article 10(3)(f) of Directive 2001/89/EC, Germany is authorised, for pigmeat obtained from pigs in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article:
Z odstopanjem od četrte alineje člena 10(3)(f) Direktive 2001/89/ES se Nemčiji dovoli, da pri prašičjem mesu, pridobljenem iz prašičev v skladu z drugim odstavkom tega člena:
to apply the health marking laid down in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 854/2004;
uporabi oznake zdravstvene ustreznosti iz člena 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 854/2004;
not to submit the fresh meat to a subsequent treatment in accordance with the rules laid down in Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/99/EC.
ne predloži svežega mesa v nadaljnjo obdelavo v skladu s predpisi iz člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/99/ES.
Without prejudice to the measures provided for in Directive 2001/89/EC and in particular Article 11(1)(f) and Article 11(2) of that Directive, where Germany applies the derogation provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article, the pigmeat shall be obtained from pigs which have been slaughtered within 12 hours of arrival at the slaughterhouse and which originate from:
Kadar Nemčija uporabi odstopanje, določeno v odstavku 1, in brez poseganja v ukrepe, določene z Direktivo 2001/89/ES ter zlasti členom 11(1)(f) in členom 11(2) navedene direktive, se prašičje meso pridobi iz prašičev, ki so bili zaklani v 12 urah po prihodu v klavnico in ki izvirajo:
a surveillance zone established in the areas listed in Annex I(A) to this Decision, in accordance with Article 9(1) of Directive 2001/89/EC and around a protection zone where:
z ogroženega območja, vzpostavljenega na območjih iz Priloge I(A) k tej odločbi v skladu s členom 9(1) Direktive 2001/89/ES in okoli okuženega območja, kadar:
no outbreak of classical swine fever has been detected during a period of 21 days prior to the movement of the pigs to the slaughterhouse and where at least 21 days have elapsed following the completion of the preliminary cleaning and disinfection of the infected holdings;
izbruh klasične prašičje kuge ni ugotovljen v obdobju 21 dni pred prevozom prašičev v klavnico in kadar mine najmanj 21 dni od opravljenega preliminarnega čiščenja in dezinfekcije okuženih gospodarstev;
clinical examinations for classical swine fever have been carried out in all holdings in those protection and surveillance zones following the detection of classical swine fever, with negative results;
so rezultati kliničnih pregledov v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo, opravljenih po ugotovljeni klasični prašičji kugi na vseh gospodarstvih na navedenih okuženih in ogroženih območjih, negativni;
a holding:
z gospodarstva:
which has been authorised by the competent authority to remove pigs to a designated slaughterhouse;
ki mu je pristojni organ dovolil, da prašiče odpremi v določeno klavnico;
which has had no contact with an infected holding, following the epidemiological inquiry;
ki po epidemiološki poizvedbi ni imelo stika z okuženim gospodarstvom;
which has been subject to regular inspections by a veterinarian following the establishment of the surveillance zone and that inspection has included all pigs kept on the holding;
na katerem je veterinar po vzpostavitvi ogroženega območja opravljal redne preglede in so bili z navedenim pregledom zajeti vsi prašiči na gospodarstvu;
where all pigs have been submitted to clinical and laboratory examinations in accordance with paragraphs 1, 3, 4 and 5 of Chapter IV(D) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC.
kadar so bili na vseh prašičih opravljeni klinični pregledi in laboratorijske preiskave v skladu z odstavki 1, 3, 4 in 5 poglavja IV(D) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES.
Germany shall ensure that the slaughterhouse designated in application of paragraphs 1 and 2:
Nemčija zagotovi, da klavnica, določena z uporabo odstavkov 1 in 2:
is located within the areas listed in Annex I(A);
stoji znotraj območij iz Priloge I(A);
does not on the same day, accept pigs for slaughter, other than the pigs referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
ne prejme na isti dan v zakol prašičev, ki niso prašiči iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
Germany shall ensure that the vehicles used for the transport of the pigs referred to in paragraph 2 are cleaned and disinfected twice after each transport.’
Nemčija zagotovi, da so vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz prašičev iz odstavka 2, po vsakem prevozu dvakrat očiščena in dezinficirana.“
The following Article 4a is inserted:
Vstavi se člen 4a:
Germany shall ensure that for pigmeat referred to in Article 3a of this Decision:
Nemčija za prašičje meso iz člena 3a te odločbe zagotovi:
a certificate is issued in accordance with the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 599/2004 and completed by the official veterinarian with the animal health attestation as set out in Annex III to this Decision;
da se izda zdravstveno spričevalo v skladu s Prilogo k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 599/2004, ki ga uradni veterinar dopolni s potrdilom o zdravstvenem stanju živali, kakor je navedeno v Prilogi III k tej odločbi;
it must be accompanied by the certificate referred to in paragraph (a).
da ga mora spremljati zdravstveno spričevalo iz odstavka (a).
Germany shall ensure that the Commission and the Member States are provided with the following information concerning the pigs referred to in Article 3a:
Nemčija zagotovi, da se Komisiji in državam članicam predložijo naslednji podatki v zvezi s prašiči iz člena 3a:
before the slaughtering of the pigs, the name and location of the slaughterhouses designated to receive the pigs for slaughter;
pred zakolom prašičev ime in kraj klavnice, določene za zakol prašičev;
after the slaughtering of the pigs, on a weekly basis, a report which contains information on:
po zakolu prašičev tedensko poročilo s podatki o:
the number of the pigs slaughtered at the designated slaughterhouses;
številu zaklanih prašičev v določenih klavnicah;
the identification system and movement controls applied to slaughter the pigs, as required in accordance with Article 11(1)(f) of Directive 2001/89/EC.’
sistemu identifikacije in nadzoru gibanja, ki se uporabljata pri zakolu prašičev v skladu s členom 11(1)(f) Direktive 2001/89/ES.“
Germany shall ensure that:
Nemčija zagotovi:
in the areas listed in Annex I(A), at least the services provided by persons in direct contact with pigs or requiring entrance to the housing areas for pigs and the use of vehicles for transport of pigs and vehicles for transport of feed, manure or dead animals to and from pig holdings, are limited to those areas and are not shared with other parts of the Community;
da se na območjih iz Priloge I vsaj storitve, ki jih opravljajo osebe v neposrednem stiku s prašiči ali ki zahtevajo vstop na prostor, kjer so prašiči, ter uporaba vozil za prevoz prašičev in vozil za prevoz krme, gnoja ali poginulih živali z in na gospodarstva s prašiči omejijo na navedena območja in se ne uporabljajo tudi v drugih delih Skupnosti;
if the areas listed in Annex I(A) are divided in defined risk-based zones the provisions of paragraph (a) are limited to these zones;
da se določbe iz odstavka (a), kadar so območja iz Priloge I(A) razdeljena na opredeljena območja tveganja, omejijo na ta območja;
the persons and vehicles referred to in point (a) may provide services outside the areas listed in Annex I(A) or the risk-based zones following the thorough cleansing and disinfection of the vehicles, equipment and any other fomite and a minimum absence of any contact with pigs or pig holdings of at least three days; contact in connection with transport carried out pursuant to Article 2(2)(a) are deemed to have taken place within that defined zone or those defined zones;
da osebe in vozila iz točke (a) lahko zagotavljajo storitve zunaj območij iz Priloge I(A) ali območij tveganja, če se opravi temeljito čiščenje in dezinfekcija vozil, opreme in vseh drugih kontaminiranih snovi in če najmanj tri dni niso bili v stiku s prašiči ali gospodarstvi s prašiči; za stike v povezavi s prevozom, ki se izvaja v skladu s členom 2(2)(a), se šteje, da so bili znotraj navedenega opredeljenega območja ali navedenih opredeljenih območij;
without prejudice to the measures taken in the framework of Directive 2001/89/EC, as soon as possible pig holdings situated in the protection zone of a confirmed outbreak in the municipality of Borken in North Rhine-Westphalia are preventively emptied from all pigs;
da se brez poseganja v ukrepe, sprejete v okviru Direktive 2001/89/ES, v najkrajšem možnem času preventivno izpraznijo vsa gospodarstva s prašiči na okuženem območju potrjenega izbruha v občini Borken v Severnem Porenju-Vestfaliji;
in the areas listed in Annex I(A) surveillance measures are carried out in accordance with the principles set out in Annex II;
da se na območjih iz Priloge I(A) izvajajo nadzorni ukrepi v skladu z načeli, določenimi v Prilogi II;
the measures in case of suspicion of the presence of classical swine fever in pigs on a holding are applied as necessary, in accordance with Article 4(3)(a) of Directive 2001/89/EC;
da se v primeru suma na klasično prašičjo kugo pri prašičih na gospodarstvu po potrebi uporabijo ukrepi v skladu s členom 4(3)(a) Direktive Sveta 2001/89/ES;
an appropriate information campaign is addressed to pig farmers.
da se za rejce prašičev izvede ustrezna obveščevalna akcija.
The measures referred to in paragraph 1(d) of this Article shall be taken without prejudice to Decision 90/424/EEC.’
Ukrepi iz odstavka 1(d) tega člena se sprejmejo brez poseganja v Odločbo 90/424/EGS.“
The following Article 5a is inserted:
Vstavi se člen 5a:
Without prejudice to the measures provided for in Directive 2001/89/EC and in particular Articles 10(4) and 11(3) thereof, Germany shall ensure that in the areas listed in Annex I(A):
Brez poseganja v ukrepe iz Direktive 2001/89/ES in zlasti členov 10(4) in 11(3) Direktive Nemčija na območjih iz Priloge I(A) zagotovi:
the measures in the protection and surveillance zones continue to apply until at least 40 days have elapsed following the completion of preliminary cleaning and disinfection measures on the infected holdings;
da se ukrepi na okuženih in ogroženih območjih neprekinjeno uporabljajo še najmanj 40 dni po opravljenem preliminarnem čiščenju in dezinfekciji na okuženih gospodarstvih;
pigs on all holdings in the surveillance zones have, in addition to the examinations referred to in Article 11(3)(b) of Directive 2001/89/EC and before the measures provided for in Directive 2001/89/EC are withdrawn in the surveillance zone, undergone clinical and laboratory examinations carried out in accordance with Chapter IV(F) of the Annex to Decision 2002/106/EC; those examinations must not take place before 30 days have elapsed following the completion of preliminary cleaning and disinfection measures on the infected holdings.’
da se na prašičih na vseh gospodarstvih na ogroženih območjih poleg pregledov iz člena 11(3)(b) Direktive 2001/89/ES in preden se na ogroženih območjih odpravijo ukrepi iz Direktive 2001/89/ES, opravijo klinični pregledi in laboratorijske preiskave v skladu s poglavjem IV (F) Priloge k Odločbi 2002/106/ES; da se navedeni pregledi ne smejo opraviti, dokler ne mine 30 dni od opravljenega preliminarnega čiščenja in dezinfekcije na okuženem gospodarstvu.“
Article 6 is replaced by the following:
Člen 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
Member States, other than Germany, shall ensure that:
Države članice razen Nemčije zagotovijo:
no pigs are sent to holdings and slaughterhouses in the areas listed in Annex I(A);
da ne pošiljajo prašičev na gospodarstva in v klavnice na območjih iz Priloge I(A);
within their territory, persons and vehicles referred to in point (a) of Article 5(1) comply with the restrictions set out in that point and only provide services in accordance with point (c) of that Article.’
da osebe in vozila iz točke (a) člena 5(1) na njihovem ozemlju upoštevajo omejitve iz navedene točke ter zagotavljajo storitve samo v skladu s točko (c) navedenega člena.“