natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was considered that since it had been declared a non-cooperating exporter, no determination concerning their MET claim was relevant, as no individual margin could be calculated for this company in the present circumstances.
Ker je bila prijavljena kot nesodelujoči izvoznik, se je štelo, da določitev v zvezi z njenim zahtevkom za TGO ni bila pomembna, saj za to družbo v sedanjih okoliščinah ni bilo mogoče izračunati individualne stopnje.
The exporting producers concerned and the Community industry were given an opportunity to comment on the above findings.
Zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom in industriji Skupnosti je bila dana možnost, da izrazijo pripombe na zgornje ugotovitve.
The Chinese exporting producer referred to in recital 85 could not demonstrate that it fulfilled criteria 1, 2 and 3 above and was therefore refused MET.
Kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik iz uvodne izjave 85 ni mogel dokazati, da izpolnjuje zgornja merila 1, 2 in 3, in se mu je zato TGO zavrnil.
The investigation of this company and its related companies showed that this group includes two producing entities, one being a Chinese company and the other a branch in China of the Hong Kong parent company.
Preiskava te družbe in njenih povezanih družb je pokazala, da ta skupina vključuje dva proizvodna subjekta, eden je bila kitajska družba in drugi podružnica hongkonške matične družbe na Kitajskem.
The company was not able to demonstrate that the management of this branch is not influenced by the Chinese State.
Družba ni mogla dokazati, da kitajska država ne vpliva na upravljanje te podružnice.
Furthermore, the business licence of the Chinese producing company states that a minimum percentage of the output should be exported.
Poleg tega obrtno dovoljenje kitajske družbe proizvajalke določa, da se mora izvoziti minimalni odstotek proizvodnje.
The company claimed that it could obtain from the local authorities the permission to sell domestically, i.e. obtain an unrestricted business licence.
Družba je trdila, da bi lahko od lokalnih organov dobila dovoljenje za prodajo na notranjem trgu, tj., dobila neomejeno obrtno dovoljenje.
However, it did not substantiate this allegation and neither asked for the removal of the apparent restriction from its business licence, nor changed its Articles of Association in which the export requirement was also included.
Vendar pa te trditve ni utemeljila in ni zaprosila za odpravo očitne omejitve na njenem obrtnem dovoljenju, niti ni spremenila svojega statuta, v katerem je bila vključena tudi izvozna zahteva.
Consequently, it is concluded that the company did not provide sufficient evidence that it can freely and flexibly sell according to market signals, which would include being able to sell domestically.
Zato je mogoče skleniti, da družba ni predložila zadostnih dokazov, da lahko prosto in prožno prodaja glede na tržne signale, kar bi vključevalo sposobnost prodaje na notranjem trgu.
This restriction stems from significant State interference, i.e. a business licence which limits the company's scope of activity to the export market.
Ta omejitev izvira iz znatnega vmešavanja države, tj. obrtnega dovoljenja, ki omejuje področje dejavnosti družbe na izvozni trg.
The above means that the company’s claim for individual treatment (IT) was also rejected as the company failed the criteria set out in Article 9(5)(b) of the basic Regulation namely that export prices and quantities were freely determined.
To pomeni, da se je zahtevek družbe za individualno obravnavo („IO“) prav tako zavrnil, ker družba ni izpolnjevala meril, določenih v členu 9(5)(b), in sicer, da se izvozne cene in količine določajo prosto.
In regard to criterion 2, given that the branch of the Hong Kong parent company is run on a cash basis, it is considered that its accounts do not comply with the accrual principle in accordance with international accounting standards (IAS).
V zvezi z merilom 2 se glede na to, da podružnica hongkonške matične družbe deluje na podlagi dejansko realiziranih plačil, šteje, da njene evidence ne izpolnjujejo obračunskega načela v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“).
Furthermore, the lack of separation in the operations of this branch from those of the other producing company casts serious doubts on the accuracy of the accounts, in particular relating to costs, of both entities.
Poleg tega pomanjkanje razmejitve v poslovanju te podružnice od poslovanja druge proizvodne družbe vzbuja resne dvome o natančnosti evidenc obeh subjektov, zlasti glede stroškov.
Therefore the second criterion for MET cannot be considered to be fulfilled.
Zato se ne more šteti, da je izpolnjeno drugo merilo za TGO.
As for the land use rights and factory building of this branch, the company did not clearly demonstrate how they were acquired, or whether they are subject to depreciation.
Kar zadeva pravice do rabe zemljišč in tovarniških objektov te podružnice, družba ni jasno prikazala, kako so bili kupljeni oziroma ali so predmet amortizacije.
Therefore the third criterion for MET cannot be considered to be fulfilled given that the company has not demonstrated that there are no distortions carried over from the former non-market economy system in relation to land use rights and the acquisition of the factory buildings.
Zato se ne more šteti, da je izpolnjeno tretje merilo za TGO, glede na to, da družba ni dokazala, da ni nobenega izkrivljanja, ki bi se preneslo še iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva, glede pravic do rabe zemljišča in nakupa tovarniških objektov.
Another Chinese exporting producer had in its business licence and Articles of Association a provision stating that 100 % of the output of the company should be exported.
Drugi kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je imel v svojem obrtnem dovoljenju in statutu določbo, ki je navajala, da je treba 100 % proizvodnje izvoziti.
As such, the company was subject to an export obligation during the IP and the Commission initially concluded that it was not free to take business decisions according to market signals and therefore, the first MET criterion was not met.
Za družbo kot tako je med OP veljala izvozna obveznost, Komisija pa je prvotno ugotovila, da družba ni mogla prosto sprejemati poslovnih odločitev glede na tržne signale, zato prvo merilo za TGO ni bilo izpolnjeno.
However, this company submitted evidence that these restrictions had been removed in March 2006.
Vendar pa je ta družba predložila dokaze, da so bile omejitve odpravljene marca 2006.
The company also substantiated its decision not to sell in the domestic market in the period up to and including the IP by providing evidence that this decision was taken exclusively in view of the situation of the company and its market prospects, and was therefore, despite the export sales requirement in the business licence, in effect, free from State interference.
Družba je svojo odločitev, da ne bo prodajala na notranjem trgu v obdobju do OP in med njim, utemeljila s predložitvijo dokaza, da je bila ta odločitev sprejeta izključno zaradi položaja družbe in njenih tržnih možnosti ter da se v to, kljub zahtevi glede izvoza v obrtnem dovoljenju, država dejansko ni vmešavala.
Given that the company’s business licence no longer contains the export sales requirement, and that the company substantiated its claim that the apparent restriction was already obsolete before its removal, the company meets the first MET criterion.
Ker obrtno dovoljenje družbe ne vsebuje več zahteve glede izvoza in ker je družba utemeljila svoj zahtevek, da je bila očitna omejitev že zastarela, preden je bila odpravljena, družba izpolnjuje prvo merilo za TGO.
The Chinese government and several exporters argued that the Commission only made a decision on the MET status of the sampled companies, thus failing to address the MET claims of around 100 non-sampled companies.
Kitajska vlada in številni izvozniki so trdili, da je Komisija sprejela le sklep o statusu TGO vzorčenih družb, skratka ni obravnavala zahtevke za TGO približno stotih nevzorčenih družb.
According to their claim, the Commission is obliged to make individual determinations with regard to submitted MET claims irrespectively whether an exporter is sampled or not.
Glede na njihove zahtevke je Komisija dolžna odločiti za vsako državo posebej glede na predložene zahtevke za TGO in ne glede na to, ali je določen izvoznik vključen v vzorec ali ne.
It should first be noted that the Commission was faced in this proceeding with an unprecedentedly large number of cooperating exporters, i.e. more than 100.
Najprej je treba opomniti, da se je Komisija v tem postopku soočila z neprimerljivo velikim številom sodelujočih izvoznikov, tj. več kot 100.
Against this background, the Commission had to ensure that the investigation could be carried out with the available resources, within the legal time frame and without compromising the standards of assessment of MET claims.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je morala Komisija zagotoviti, da se lahko preiskava izvede z razpoložljivimi viri v zakonitem časovnem obdobju in brez ogrožanja standardov za ocenjevanje zahtevkov za TGO.
The Commission considers that the existing provision on sampling (Article 17 of the basic Regulation) fully encompasses the situation of companies claiming MET.
Komisija meni, da obstoječa določba o vzorčenju (člen 17 osnovne uredbe) v celoti zajema stanje družb, ki zahtevajo TGO.
Indeed, exporters are by the nature of the sampling exercise denied individual assessment in both market economy countries and in economies in transition, and the conclusions reached for the sample are extended to them.
Dejansko se izvoznikom zaradi narave vzorčenja zavrne individualno ocenjevanje tako v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom kot državah z gospodarstvom v tranziciji in se sklepi, sprejeti za vzorec, razširijo nanje.
Article 17 of the basic Regulation sets out a general method to deal with situations where an individual examination is no longer possible due to the high number of companies involved, i.e. the use of a representative sample.
Člen 17 osnovne uredbe določa splošno metodo za soočanje s situacijami, ko individualna preiskava zaradi velikega števila vključenih družb, tj. uporaba reprezentativnega vzorca, ni več mogoča.
There is no reason why this method cannot equally be applied where the high number of companies involved includes a high number of companies requesting MET.
Ni razloga, zakaj se ta metoda ne more enakovredno uporabljati v primeru, ko veliko število vpletenih družb vključuje veliko število družb, ki zahtevajo TGO.
Indeed, the question whether a sampled company applied for and received MET/IT or not is a technical question and only relevant for the methodology to determine the dumping margin.
Dejansko je vprašanje, ali je vzorčena družba zaprosila in dobila TGO/IO ali ne, tehnične narave in pomembno le za metodologijo, s katero se določi stopnja dampinga.
It only affects the data used for their dumping calculation, either the own data of the company or analogue country data is used.
Vpliva le na podatke, uporabljene za izračun dampinga, ne glede na to, ali so uporabljeni lastni podatki družbe ali primerljive države.
As in any other sampling case, a weighted average of all sampled companies is established, regardless of the methodology applied for the dumping calculation in respect of each company as a result of the MET/IT assessment.
Kot v vsakem drugem primeru vzorčenja se določi tehtano povprečje vseh vzorčenih družb, ne glede na metodologijo, uporabljeno za izračun dampinga za posamezno družbo, ki je posledica ocene TGO/IO.
MET/IT should thus not prevent the application of normal sampling techniques.
TGO/IO torej ne smeta preprečiti uporabe normalnih tehnik vzorčenja.
The key rationale of sampling is to balance administrative necessities to allow a case assessment in due time and within the margin of mandatory deadlines, with an individualised analysis to the best extent possible.
Ključno načelo vzorčenja je usklajenost administrativnih nujnosti, da se omogoči pravočasna ocena zadev, v okviru obveznih rokov in na podlagi kolikor je mogoče razširjene individualne analize.
The number of requests for MET in this case was so substantial that an individual examination of the requests – as sometimes done in other cases – was administratively impossible.
Število zahtevkov za TGO v tem primeru je bilo tako veliko, da njihova individualna preučitev – kot je bilo včasih storjeno v drugih primerih – administrativno ni bila izvedljiva.
Therefore, it was considered reasonable to apply equally to all non-sampled companies the weighted average margin resulting from all the companies selected for the sample, according to the criteria set out in recital 17, with no distinction being made between companies obtaining MET/IT or not.
Zato se je štelo za razumno, da se za vse nevzorčene družbe enako uporablja stopnja tehtanega povprečja, ki je rezultat vseh družb, izbranih v vzorec, v skladu z merilom, določenim v uvodni izjavi 17, ne da se razlikuje med družbami, ki jim je bil TGO/IO odobren ali ne.
The Community industry contested the granting of MET to five of the companies detailed above.
Industrija Skupnosti je ugovarjala odobritvi TGO petim družbam, opisanim zgoraj.
The Community industry argued that one of the companies granted MET is widely regarded as a State company, and that having been until recently one of the major State-owned trading groups, it is still likely to benefit from a favourable position with regard to the Chinese State, and be influenced by it.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila, da je bila ena od družb, ki ji je bil odobren TGO, na splošno obravnavana kot državna družba in da je glede na to, da je bila do nedavnega ena od glavnih trgovskih skupin v lasti države, zelo verjetno, da bo deležna naklonjenosti s strani kitajske države in da bo država nanjo tudi vplivala.
The Community industry also pointed out that the transfer of assets from the former state-owned company to the current company has potential carry-over effects.
Industrija Skupnosti je prav tako opozorila, da ima prenos sredstev iz nekdanje družbe v lasti države na sedanjo družbo potencialni učinek prenosa.
The Commission verified the ownership and control structures of this company and concluded that since 2002 it has been managed by private investors, free from State control.
Komisija je preverila lastništvo in nadzorne strukture te družbe in ugotovila, da družbo od leta 2002 upravljajo zasebni vlagatelji, ki niso pod nadzorom države.
The Commission also examined the transfer of assets from the State-owned company and is satisfied that it took place under market economy conditions.
Komisija je prav tako preučila prenos sredstev iz družbe v lasti države in je zadovoljna, da je do prenosa prišlo v tržnih razmerah.
No evidence has been presented that would challenge those conclusions.
Predloženi niso bili nobeni dokazi, ki bi izpodbijali navedene ugotovitve.
The Community industry also argued that because the company has benefited from an export subsidy it should not be granted MET.
Industrija Skupnosti je prav tako trdila, da se družbi ne more odobriti TGO, ker je prejemala izvozno subvencijo.
However, the amount and nature of this subsidy do not justify that MET be refused.
Vendar pa znesek in narava te subvencije ne zadostujeta, da se TGO zavrne.
Concerning another company granted MET, the Community industry claimed that since its exports are largely manufactured through tolling arrangements with the company referred to above it should also be denied MET.
V zvezi z drugo družbo, ki ji je bil odobren TGO, je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da bi ji bilo treba zavrniti tudi TGO, ker se njen izvoz proizvede z menjalnimi pogodbami („tolling arrangements“) z zgoraj navedeno družbo.
However, given that it has been found that the first mentioned company fulfils the MET criteria, there are no grounds to consider that this company does not fulfil the criteria because of the tolling arrangement between the two companies.
Vendar ni glede na to, da je bilo ugotovljeno, da prva zgoraj omenjena družba izpolnjuje merila za TGO, nobenega razloga za sklepanje, da ta družba ne izpolnjuje meril zaradi menjalne pogodbe med obema družbama.
Concerning a third company granted MET, the Community industry considered that the fact that the company has yet to make a profit means that it cannot be operating under market economy conditions.
V zvezi s tretjo družbo, ki ji je bil odobren TGO, je industrija Skupnosti menila, da dejstvo, da mora družba še ustvariti dobiček, pomeni, da ne more poslovati v tržnih razmerah.
However the Commission considered that this is not abnormal during the start-up phase and is compatible with market economy conditions.
Vendar pa je Komisija menila, da to ni nič neobičajnega v zagonski fazi in da je združljivo s tržnimi razmerami.
The Community industry also argued that the fact that the company’s business licence contained during the IP a minimum export requirement is incompatible with the first MET criterion.
Industrija Skupnosti je prav tako trdila, da je dejstvo, da je obrtno dovoljenje družbe med obdobjem preiskave vsebovalo minimalno izvozno zahtevo, nezdružljivo s prvim merilom za TGO.
The Commission however considers that this did not amount to an effective restriction during the IP.
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da to med OP ni veljalo za dejansko omejitev.
Firstly because the restriction was removed in the 2005 business licence, and secondly because the percentage of export sales was always significantly above the threshold stipulated in the old business licence, which indicates that the restriction in the business licence was already obsolete.
Prvič zato, ker je bila omejitev odpravljena v obrtnem dovoljenju za leto 2005, in drugič, ker je bil odstotek izvoza vedno znatno nad mejno vrednostjo, določeno v starem obrtnem dovoljenju, ki navaja, da je omejitev v obrtnem dovoljenju že bila zastarela.
Finally, the Community industry argued that an auditor’s remark concerning the valuation of raw materials by this third company means that its accounts are not reliable.
Ne nazadnje je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da revizorjeva pripomba glede vrednotenja surovin s strani te tretje družbe pomeni, da njene evidence niso zanesljive.
The Commission however considers that the fact that the auditor made this remark, and that the company took measures to rectify the situation, confirms that its accounts are independently audited and reliable.
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da dejstvo, da je revizor dal to pripombo in da je družba sprejela ukrepe za izboljšanje razmer, potrjuje, da se njene evidence neodvisno pregledujejo in so zanesljive.
Concerning a fourth company granted MET, the Community industry claimed that there was state interference in the labour policy of the company as the local administration approved the labour contract used.
V zvezi s četrto družbo, ki ji je bil odobren TGO, je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je prihajalo do vmešavanja države v politiko zaposlovanja družbe, saj je lokalna uprava odobrila pogodbo o delu, ki se je uporabljala.
Finally the Community industry disputed the granting of MET to a fifth company whose Articles of Association contained, during the IP, a provision that all production should be exported.
Ne nazadnje je industrija Skupnosti oporekala odobritvi TGO peti družbi, katere statut je med OP vseboval določbo, da je treba celotno proizvodnjo izvoziti.
However, this company sold the product concerned on the Chinese domestic market both before and during the IP.
Vendar pa je ta družba zadevni izdelek prodajala na kitajskem notranjem trgu pred OP in med njim.
In 2005 the company removed any restrictions from its Articles of Association and in these circumstances there is no reason for MET not to be granted.
Leta 2005 je družba iz svojega statuta odpravila vse omejitve in v teh okoliščinah ni bilo nobenega razloga, da se TGO ne bi mogel odobriti.
The two Chinese exporting producers mentioned in recitals 87 to 90 which were declared non-cooperating, objected to the Commission’s services conclusions that they should be treated as non-cooperating and should be denied MET.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, navedena v uvodnih izjavah 87 do 90, ki sta bila prijavljena kot nesodelujoča, sta nasprotovala sklepom služb Komisije, da jih je treba obravnavati kot nesodelujoče in jim zavrniti TGO.
However, the companies did not provide a convincing explanation or element that would refute the evidence which is at the disposal of the Commission and was collected during the on-the-spot verification visits at the premises of one of the companies.
Vendar družbi nista zagotovili prepričljivih pojasnil ali prvin, ki bi zavrnile dokaze, ki so bile na voljo Komisiji in ki jih je zbrala med preveritvenimi obiski na kraju samem v prostorih ene od družb.
It was therefore confirmed that they should be treated as non-cooperating producers in this proceeding and denied MET accordingly.
Zato se je potrdilo, da jih je treba v tem postopku šteti za nesodelujoče proizvajalce in TGO jim je bil temu ustrezno zavrnjen.
The Advisory Committee was consulted and the parties directly concerned were informed accordingly.
Posvetovalo se je s svetovalnim odborom in neposredno vpletene stranke so bile o tem ustrezno obveščene.
The main arguments raised by exporters and the Community industry have already been addressed above.
Glavne utemeljitve, ki so jih izrazili izvozniki in industrija Skupnosti, so bile obravnavane že zgoraj.
Non-cooperation of companies with the investigation
Nesodelovanje družb v preiskavi
Various allegations were received by the Commission concerning the company described in the latter part of recital 86 which placed in question the validity of the information received by the Commission during the on-the-spot investigation, in their MET claim and their questionnaire response.
Komisija je prejela različne navedbe v zvezi z družbo, opisano v zadnjem delu uvodne izjave 86, ki je podvomila v veljavnost informacij, ki jih je Komisija dobila med preiskavo na kraju samem, v njihovem zahtevku za TGO in iz izpolnjenih vprašalnikov.
These allegations were verified and it was found indeed that the export invoices submitted during the on-the-spot verification must have been manipulated to pretend a considerably higher export price.
Te navedbe so bile preverjene in dejansko je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile verjetno izvozne fakture, predložene med preveritvijo na kraju samem, prirejene, da bi pokazale znatno višjo izvozno ceno.
The evidence was presented to the company, which contested the view that this was sufficient to consider the company not cooperating with the investigation under Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Dokaz je bil predložen družbi, ki je nasprotovala stališču, da to zadostuje, da se za družbo šteje, kot da ne sodeluje v preiskavi v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
However it was unable to explain the difference between these documents, and as such it was confirmed that it should be treated as non-cooperating in this proceeding.
Vendar pa ni mogla pojasniti razlike med temi dokumenti in zato se je potrdilo, da se mora v tem postopku šteti za nesodelujočo družbo.
Indeed, given the nature of the non-cooperation, i.e. the submission of wrong information and the falsification of documents, as well as the time when this was found out, i.e. towards the very end of the investigation, the information submitted by this company has to be rejected totally as it cannot be ruled out that other information and documents submitted are equally affected by such behaviour.
Glede na naravo nesodelovanja, tj. predložitev napačnih informacij in ponareditev dokumentov, ter na čas razkritja navedenih dejstev, tj. proti koncu preiskave, je bilo treba informacije, ki jih je ta družba predložila, dejansko v celoti zavrniti, saj ni mogoče ovreči, da takšno vedenje enako vpliva na druge predložene informacije in dokumente.
Determination of normal value for exporting producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bil TGO odobren
Three companies of the seven granted MET had globally representative domestic sales.
Tri družbe od sedmih, ki jim je bil TGO odobren, so na splošno imele reprezentativno domačo prodajo.