natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
User companies usually have purchase agreements with Chinese producers to import LAM in the Community market.
Pri uvozu vzvodnih mehanizmov družbe uporabnikov ponavadi sklenejo s kitajskimi proizvajalci sporazume o dobavi.
Users claim that the Chinese products have reached a very good quality compared to those produced in the Community following a long period of development with their Chinese partners.
Uporabniki trdijo, da so kitajski izdelki dosegli zelo dobro kakovost v primerjavi z izdelki, proizvedenimi v Skupnosti, po dolgi fazi razvoja z njihovimi kitajskimi partnerji.
Therefore, they allege that they improved the availability of the material and competition on the market.
Zato trdijo, da se je ponudba izboljšala, prav tako pa tudi konkurenca na trgu.
They also claim that there would be a risk of shortage of supply if measures were imposed.
Trdijo tudi, da obstaja tveganje pomanjkanja zalog v primeru uvedbe ukrepov.
The cooperating importers raise similar concerns.
Sodelujoči uvozniki izražajo podobne pomisleke.
Only one user supports the imposition of the measures but claims that measures on LAF should also be imposed.
Le en uporabnik podpira uvedbo ukrepov, vendar trdi, da bi bilo treba uvesti tudi ukrepe za vzvodne mehanizme za fascikle.
In view of the large production capacity available in the Community (see Table 4) and since additional investments in production capacity could easily be made by Community producers to meet the demand in a market not distorted by dumping practices, the claim concerning possible shortages due to lack of capacity of the Community industry does not seem to be realistic and is certainly not substantiated.
Glede na veliko proizvodno zmogljivost, ki je na voljo v Skupnosti (glej tabelo 4 zgoraj), in dejstvo, da bi proizvajalci Skupnosti lahko brez težav dodatno vlagali v proizvodno zmogljivost, da bi zadostili povpraševanje na trgu, ki ga ni izkrivila dampinška praksa, se zdi, da trditev glede možnega pomanjkanja zaradi nezadostnih zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti ni realistična in vsekakor ni utemeljena.
It is considered that this would not reduce effective competition on the Community market.
Šteje se, da to ne bi zmanjšalo učinkovite konkurence trga Skupnosti.
It is also considered that the imposition of measures should not affect the overall competitiveness of the user industries materially.
Šteje se tudi, da uvedba ukrepov ne bi smela znatno vplivati na splošno konkurenčnost uporabniške industrije.
The investigation has shown that some producers of LAM are also producing the downstream products and that there are still a large proportion of users which are mainly purchasing their LAM from non-dumped sources.
Preiskava je pokazala, da nekateri proizvajalci vzvodnih mehanizmov izdelujejo tudi izdelke v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu in da je še vedno velik delež uporabnikov, ki v veliki meri nabavljajo vzvodne mehanizme iz nedampinških virov.
All users would have the possibility to revert to non-dumped sources of supply.
Vsi uporabniki bi imeli možnost, da se preusmerijo na nedampinške vire dobave.
As regards possible cost increases, it cannot be excluded that this would take place immediately after the imposition of AD measures.
Kar zadeva možno povečanje stroškov, ne gre izključiti dejstva, da bi se to zgodilo takoj po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov.
Such cost increase would in particular affect companies which are mainly purchasing low-priced dumped products from China.
Takšno povečanje stroškov bi zlasti vplivalo na družbe, ki v glavnem nabavljajo poceni dampinške izdelke iz Kitajske.
In the worst case scenario, considering the current market share of the Community industry, the proposed measures may lead to an average cost increase of 2,5 % of the cost of the downstream product on average.
V najslabšem primeru bi lahko glede na trenutni tržni delež industrije Skupnosti predlagani ukrepi pripeljali do 2,5 % povečanja povprečnih stroškov pri nadaljnji prodaji.
It should be noted though that the product concerned is only a minor part of the activities of the down stream industry and that in addition profitability of the product concerned is indeed very good.
Treba je opomniti, da je zadevni izdelek le manjši del dejavnosti industrije v nadaljnjem proizvodnem procesu in da je dodatna dobičkonosnost zadevnega izdelka resnično zelo dobra.
However, the Commission does not consider that this scenario will take place and a more realistic scenario, as explained in recitals 116 and 120, is that the imposition of AD measures should lead to an increase of effective competition on the Community market and to the recovery of the market share and economic situation of the Community industry.
Vendar po mnenju Komisije ni mogoče, da bi do tega prišlo, bolj realistično je pričakovati, kot je pojasnjeno v uvodnih izjavah (116) in (120) zgoraj, da bo uvedba protidampinških ukrepov pripeljala do povečanja učinkovite konkurence na trgu Skupnosti ter do izboljšanja tržnega deleža in gospodarskega položaja industrije Skupnosti.
This should in the short term avoid any undue price increase on the Community market.
Kratkoročno se bi s tem izognili vsakršnemu neupravičenemu povišanju cen na trgu Skupnosti.
In any event any potential cost increase should also be seen in the light of the interest of the user companies which are mainly purchasing their LAM from the Community industry.
V vsakem primeru bi vsako morebitno povečanje stroškov nastalo tudi zaradi interesa družb uporabnikov, ki v glavnem nabavljajo svoj vzvodne mehanizme pri industriji Skupnosti.
On balance, it is therefore provisionally considered that any negative impact on the cost of certain users is not such as to prevent the imposition of measures.
Zato se začasno šteje, da kakršne koli negativni vpliv na stroške določenega uporabnika ni takšen, da bi preprečil uvedbo ukrepov.
The imposition of measures on imports of LAM originating in the PRC would clearly be in the interests of the Community industry.
Uvedba ukrepov za uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov s poreklom iz LRK bi bila nedvomno v interesu industrije Skupnosti.
As regards both the importers/traders and the user industries, any impact on prices of LAM is not expected to unduly affect their competitiveness and competition on the Community market.
Kakršen koli vpliv na cene vzvodnih mehanizmov naj tako pri uvoznikih/trgovcih kot pri uporabniški industriji ne bi neupravičeno vplival na njihovo konkurenčnost in konkurenco na trgu Skupnosti.
In contrast, the losses suffered by the Community industry and the supplier industries, and the risks of further production closings are clearly of great magnitude.
Nasprotno pa so izgube, ki so jih utrpeli industrija Skupnosti in dobavitelji, ter tveganja nadaljnjih zaprtij proizvodnje neprimerno večji.
In view of the above, it is provisionally concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping measures on imports of LAM originating in the PRC.
Glede na zgoraj povedano se začasno sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov s poreklom iz LRK.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, resulting injury and Community interest, provisional measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Ob upoštevanju sklepov v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, ki jo je povzročil, in interesom Skupnosti bi bilo treba uvesti začasne ukrepe, da se prepreči, da bi dampinški uvoz še naprej povzročal škodo industriji Skupnosti.
The measures should be imposed at a level sufficient to eliminate the injury caused by these imports without exceeding the dumping margin found.
Ukrepi morajo biti uvedeni na stopnji, ki omogoča odpravljanje škode, ki jo ta uvoz povzroča, ne da bi se presegla ugotovljeno stopnjo dampinga.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measure should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and to obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, namely in the absence of dumped imports, on the sales of the like product in the Community.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, ki bi bila potrebna za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bilo sklenjeno, da bi morali ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočati, da pokrije svoje proizvodne stroške in ustvari dobiček pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga industrija te vrste v sektorju lahko ustvarila v okviru normalnih konkurenčnih pogojev, tj. brez dampinškega uvoza, od prodaje podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
This margin is in line with what was achieved in the general category in the absence of dumped imports and is therefore provisionally considered to be a reasonable margin.
Ta stopnja je v skladu s tistim, kar je bilo doseženo v splošni kategoriji brez dampinškega uvoza in se zato začasno šteje, da je razumna stopnja.
On this basis, a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product.
Na podlagi tega je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za podoben izdelek industrije Skupnosti.
The non-injurious price was obtained by adding the abovementioned profit margin of 5 % to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila dobljena s prištetjem zgoraj omenjene 5 % stopnje dobička stroškom proizvodnje.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import cif value.
Morebitna razlika med tema dvema primerjavama je bila izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
In all cases it was found that the injury margins were higher than the dumping margins found.
V vseh primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile stopnje škode višje od stopenj ugotovljenega dampinga.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to all other companies) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo na ravni države, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) veljajo torej izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih proizvajajo omenjene družbe, torej omenjeni specifični pravni subjekti.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this document with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvede katera koli druga družba, ki v izvedbenem delu te uredbe ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, posebej navedenimi, ne morejo biti upravičeni do teh stopenj in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezanimi s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
Zaradi dobrega delovanja uprave se določi rok, v katerem lahko zainteresirane stranke, ki so se javile v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku, pisno navedejo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purposes of this document are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purpose of any definitive measures,
Treba je navesti tudi, da so ugotovitve glede uvedbe dajatev, sprejete za namen tega dokumenta, začasne in se lahko znova proučijo za katere koli dokončne ukrepe –
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of lever arch mechanisms for archiving sheets and other documents in binders and files and falling within CN code ex83051000, (TARIC code 8305100050) originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Začasna protidampinška dajatev se uvede na uvoz vzvodnih mehanizmov, ki se uporabljajo za arhiviranje listov in drugih dokumentov v fasciklih ter mapah z nepovezanimi listi in so uvrščeni pod oznako KN ex83051000, (oznaka TARIC 8305100050) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
These lever arch mechanisms consist of arched sturdy metal elements (normally two) on a back plate and having at least one opening trigger that permits inserting and filing of sheets and other documents.
Ti vzvodni mehanizmi so sestavljeni iz (navadno dveh) čvrstih upognjenih kovinskih delov, ki sta pritrjena na hrbtišče in imata najmanj eno vzvodno ročico, ki omogoča vstavljanje in odlaganje listov in drugih dokumentov.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, interested parties may request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted, make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within one month of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Brez poseganja v člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke v enem mesecu od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe zahtevajo razkritje bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta ta uredba, ter v pisni obliki izrazijo svoje stališče in prosijo za ustno zaslišanje pred Komisijo.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of the date of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke dajo pripombe k uporabi te uredbe v roku enega meseca od začetka njene veljave.
OJ C 103, 28.4.2005, p. 18.
UL C 103, 28.4.2005, str. 18.
EJA international;
EJA international.
Esselte Leitz GmbH & Co.;
Esselte Leitz GmbH & Co.,
However, this data was cross-checked with Eurostat data and compared with the export data verified at the premises of the largest exporter in China representing over 65 % of total Chinese exports which cooperated in the investigation.
Opravljen je bil navzkrižen pregled teh podatkov s podatki Eurostata ter primerjava s podatki o izvozu, preverjenimi v prostorih največjega pri preiskavi sodelujočega kitajskega izvoznika, ki predstavlja več kot 65 % celotnega kitajskega izvoza.
Both sources confirmed that the trends in volume were comparable to those contained in the complaint.
Oba vira sta potrdila, da so bila gibanja glede obsega primerljiva s tistimi, ki jih vsebuje pritožba.
In addition, as explained in recital 67, the import prices from the PRC fell by 11 % and Chinese import prices undercut those of the Community industry by 24 %.
Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi (67) zgoraj, so tudi uvozne cene iz LRK padle za 11 %, kitajske uvozne cene pa so nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti za 24 %.
Moreover, there Community industry’s prices were depressed.
Poleg tega so se znižale tudi cene industrije Skupnosti.
18 %– s 2001 = 100
18 %– i 2001 = 100
22 %– s 2001 = 100
22 %– i 2001 = 100
17 %– s 2001 = 100
17 %– i 2001 = 100
55 %– s 2001 = 100
55 %– i 2001 = 100
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2006 of 26 January 2006 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of lever arch mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 134/2006 z dne 26. januarja 2006 o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz vinske kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
(Official Journal of the European Union L 23 of 27 January 2006)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 23 z dne 27. januarja 2006)
On page 32, in Article 1(2):
Stran 32, člen 1(2):
‘The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Community-frontier price shall be:’,
„Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve, pred plačilom dajatve, za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, je:“
‘The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of the products manufactured by the companies listed below shall be:’.
„Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj naštete družbe, je:“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 135/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 135/2006
on the issue of rice import licences for applications lodged in the first 10 working days of January 2006 under Regulation (EC) No 327/98
o izdaji uvoznih dovoljenj za riž na podlagi zahtevkov, vloženih v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca januarja 2006 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 327/98
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the markets in rice [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1785/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupni ureditvi trgov za riž [1],
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 327/98 of 10 February 1998 opening and providing for the administration of certain tariff quotas for imports of rice and broken rice [2], and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 327/98 z dne 10. februarja 1998 o odprtju in upravljanju nekaterih tarifnih kvot za uvoz riža in lomljenega riža [2], in zlasti člena 5(2) Uredbe,
An examination of the quantities for which rice import licence applications have been lodged for the January 2006 tranche shows that licences should be issued for the quantities applied for, multiplied, where appropriate, by a percentage reduction and the quantities available for carry-over to the following tranche should be fixed,
Po preučitvi količin, za katere so bili vloženi zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za riž, veljavna za tranšo januar 2006, se je pokazalo, da morajo biti dovoljenja izdana za količine iz zahtevkov, po potrebi zmanjšana za odstotek znižanja, in da je treba določiti razpoložljive količine, ki se prenesejo v naslednjo tranšo –
Import licence applications for the tariff quotas for rice opened by Regulation (EC) No 327/98, submitted in the first 10 working days of January 2006 and notified to the Commission shall be subject to percentage reduction coefficients as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Zahtevki za uvozna dovoljenja za tarifne kvote za riž, odprte z Uredbo (ES) št. 327/98, predloženi v prvih desetih delovnih dneh meseca januarja 2006 in o katerih je Komisija obveščena, so zmanjšani za odstotek znižanja v skladu z odstotkom, določenim v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
The quantities available under the January 2006 tranche, to be carried over to the following tranche, shall be as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Razpoložljive količine iz tranše januar 2006, ki se prenesejo v naslednjo tranšo, so določene v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Reduction percentages to be applied to quantities applied for under the tranche for January 2006 and quantities available for the following tranche:
Odstotki znižanja, ki se uporabijo za zahtevane količine za tranšo za mesec januar 2006, in količine, ki se prenesejo v naslednjo tranšo:
Quota of wholly milled or semi-milled rice falling within CN code 100630 provided for in Article 1(1)(a):
Kvota za dobro brušen riž ali manj brušen riž, ki spada pod oznako KN 100630, predvidena v členu 1(1)(a) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98
Reduction percentage for the January 2006 tranche
Odstotek znižanja za tranšo januar 2006
Quantity carried over to the tranche for April 2006
Količine, ki se prenesejo v tranšo za mesec april 2006
Quota of husked rice falling within CN code 100620 provided for in Article 1(1)(b):
Kvota za oluščen riž, ki spada pod oznako KN 100620, predvidena v členu 1(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98
Quota of broken rice falling within CN code 10064000 provided for in Article 1(1)(c):
Kvota za lomljeni riž, ki spada pod oznako KN 100640, predvidena v členu 1(1)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98
Quantity carried over to the tranche for July 2006
Količine, ki se prenesejo v tranšo za mesec julij 2006
Quota of wholly milled or semi-milled rice falling within CN code 100630 provided for in Article 1(1)(d):
Kvota za dobro brušen riž ali manj brušen riž, ki spada pod oznako KN 100630, predvidena v členu 1(1)(d) Uredbe (ES) št. 327/98
To be issued for the quantity in the application.
Izdaja za količino iz zahtevka.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 136/2006
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 15 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Article 31(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 z dne 15. maja 1999 o skupni organizaciji trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov [1], in zlasti člena 31(3) Uredbe,
Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 provides that, when the rate of the refund is being fixed, account is to be taken, where appropriate, of production refunds, aids or other measures having equivalent effect applicable in all Member States in accordance with the Regulation on the common organisation of the market in the product in question to the basic products listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005 or to assimilated products.
Člen 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1043/2005 določa, da se pri določanju stopnje nadomestila po potrebi upoštevajo proizvodna nadomestila, pomoči ali drugi ukrepi z enakim učinkom, ki se v vseh državah članicah v skladu z uredbo o skupni ureditvi trga za zadevni proizvod uporabljajo za osnovne proizvode, naštete v Prilogi I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1043/2005, ali enakovredne proizvode.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 of 9 November 2005 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards measures for the disposal of cream, butter and concentrated butter [3], lays down that butter and cream at reduced prices should be made available to industries which manufacture certain goods.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1898/2005 z dne 9. novembra 2005 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999, kar zadeva ukrepe za prodajo smetane, masla in zgoščenega masla na trugu Skupnosti [3], določa, da je treba maslo in smetano industrijskim panogam, ki proizvajajo nekatere vrste blaga, zagotoviti po znižanih cenah.
Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 2107/2005 (OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 20).
Uredba, nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2107/2005 (UL L 337, 22.12.2005, str. 20).
Rates of the refunds applicable from 27 January 2006 to certain milk products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil od 27. januarja 2006 za nekatere mlečne izdelke, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 137/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 137/2006
Rates of the refunds applicable from 27 January 2006 to certain cereals and rice products exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty [1](EUR/100 kg)
Stopnje nadomestil, ki se od 27. januarja 2006 uporabljajo za nekatere proizvode iz žit in riža, izvožene kot blago, ki ni zajeto v Prilogi I k Pogodbi [1](EUR/100 kg)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 138/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 138/2006
to the Commission Regulation of 26 January 2006 fixing the export refunds on milk and milk products
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2006 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov
Commission Regulation (EC) No 139/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 139/2006