natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was claimed that these purchases should be regarded as part of a tolling system set in place by the company.
Zahtevalo se je, da je treba te nakupe obravnavati kot del cestninskega sistema, ki ga je vzpostavila družba.
However, the purchased finished goods were in fact produced entirely by other independent producers of the product concerned.
Vendar so kupljene končne proizvode pravzaprav v celoti proizvedli drugi neodvisni proizvajalci zadevnega proizvoda.
Accordingly, only sales of the company's own production to the Community were taken into account when determining its dumping margin.
V skladu s tem se je pri določanju stopnje dampinga upoštevala le prodaja lastne proizvodnje družbe v Skupnost.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na podlagi franko tovarna.
Allowances for differences in, transport costs, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling costs, loading and ancillary costs, commissions, credit costs and bank charges relating to currency conversions were granted where applicable and justified, and duly adjusted where necessary.
Nadomestila za razlike v stroških prevoza, stroških čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovanja, stroških ravnanja, stroških natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, stroških provizij in kredita ter bančnih stroških v zvezi s pretvorbo valut so bila dodeljena, če so bila primerna in utemeljena, ter po potrebi prilagojena.
The two exporting producers referred to in recital (30) above claimed an adjustment for differences in the level of trade, pursuant to Article 2(10)(d)(i) and (ii) or, alternatively, Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalca izvoznika, omenjena v uvodni izjavi (30), sta zahtevala prilagoditev zaradi razlik v ravni trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(10)(d)(i) in (ii) ali v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe.
These exporting producers claimed that prices of own branded products are different from retailer branded products.
Ta proizvajalca izvoznika sta trdila, da se cene proizvodov z lastno blagovno znamko razlikujejo od cen proizvodov z blagovno znamko prodajalcev na drobno.
Given that the exports to the Community were only of retailer branded products while the domestic sales of the general category of products included both own branded and retailer branded, an adjustment was therefore made under Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation.
Ker so se v Skupnost izvažali le proizvodi z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno, medtem ko je domača prodaja proizvodov splošne kategorije vključevala proizvode z lastno blagovno znamko in proizvode z blagovno znamko prodajalca, je bila izvedena prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe.
The adjustment level has been estimated on the basis of the relationship of the profit margins obtained by the Community industry on their own branded products and on all products.
Raven prilagoditve je bila ocenjena na podlagi odnosa stopenj dobička, dobljenih s strani industrije Skupnosti v zvezi s proizvodi z lastno blagovno znamko in v zvezi z vsemi proizvodi.
For the sampled exporting producers, individual dumping margins were established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in (12) osnovne uredbe so bile posamezne stopnje dampinga za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike določene na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
On this basis, the provisional dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Na podlagi tega so vrednosti začasnih stopenj dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
For the cooperating companies not selected in the sample, the dumping margin was established on the basis of the weighted average dumping margin of the companies selected in the sample, pursuant to Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile izbrane v vzorec, je bila stopnja dampinga določena na osnovi tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga družb, izbranih v vzorec, v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
This weighted average dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, is 13,2 %.
Ta tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena v odstotkih cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, znaša 13,2 %.
For those exporting producers which did not cooperate, the dumping margin was established on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Za proizvajalce izvoznike, ki niso sodelovali, je bila stopnja dampinga določena na osnovi dostopnih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
To this end, the level of cooperation was first established.
Zato je bila najprej določena raven sodelovanja.
A comparison between Eurostat data concerning imports originating in Thailand and sampling replies showed that the level of cooperation was high (more than 92 %).
Primerjava med podatki Eurostata v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Tajske in odgovori na vprašalnik za vzorčenje je pokazala, da je raven sodelovanja visoka (več kot 92 %).
Therefore, and since there were no indications that the non-cooperating companies were dumping at a lower level, it was considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for the remaining companies, which had not cooperated in the investigation, at the level of the highest dumping margin found for the companies included in the sample.
V skladu s tem in ker ni bilo dokazov, da imajo nesodelujoče družbe nižjo stopnjo dampinga, se je zdelo primerno, da se stopnja dampinga za ostale družbe, ki niso sodelovale v preiskavi, določi na ravni najvišje ugotovljene stopnje dampinga za družbe, vključene v vzorec.
This approach is in accordance with the standing practice of the Community institutions and was also considered necessary in order not to provide an incentive to non-cooperation.
Ta pristop je v skladu s stalno prakso institucij Skupnosti in je bil tudi potreben, da se prepreči spodbuda za nesodelovanje.
Therefore, the residual dumping margin was calculated at the rate of 17,5 %.
Zato je bila preostala stopnja dampinga izračunana na raven 17,5 %.
Within the Community, the like product is manufactured by 18 producers.
Podoben proizvod proizvaja v Skupnosti 18 proizvajalcev.
The output of these 18 Community producers is therefore deemed to constitute the Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Proizvodnja teh 18 proizvajalcev Skupnosti se zato šteje za proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
Of these 18 producers, a total of six, being members of the complaining association, declared their interest in cooperating in the proceeding within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation and properly cooperated with the investigation.
Od teh 18 proizvajalcev je skupaj šest proizvajalcev, ki so člani združenja pritožnika, izrazilo interes za sodelovanje v postopku v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku, in ustrezno sodelovalo pri preiskavi.
These six producers were found to account for a major proportion of the total Community production of the like product, in this case around 70 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da teh šest proizvajalcev predstavlja večji delež celotne proizvodnje podobnega proizvoda v Skupnosti, v tem primeru približno 70 %.
The six cooperating producers therefore constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will be hereafter referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Teh šest sodelujočih proizvajalcev zato predstavlja industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe ter bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovani „industrija Skupnosti“.
The remaining 12 Community producers will be hereafter referred to as the ‘other Community producers’.
Preostalih 12 proizvajalcev Skupnosti bo v nadaljevanju imenovanih kot „drugi proizvajalci Skupnosti“.
None of these 12 other Community producers opposed the complaint.
Nobeden od teh 12 drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti ni nasprotoval pritožbi.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the Community industry’s own production destined for the Community market, the import volumes data on the Community market obtained from Eurostat and, concerning the other Community producers, from information available from the mini-questionnaire intended for sampling or from the complaint.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega prodaje lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, namenjene za trg Skupnosti, podatkov o obsegu uvoza na trg Skupnosti, ki jih je zagotovil Eurostat, in za druge proizvajalce Skupnosti na podlagi informacij iz kratkega vprašalnika za vzorčenje ali iz pritožbe.
In the IP, the Community market for the product concerned and the like product was approximately at the same level as in 2002, i.e. around 330000 tonnes.
V OP je bil trg Skupnosti za zadeven proizvod in podoben proizvod približno na enaki ravni kot leta 2002, tj. približno 330000 ton.
Consumption remained relatively stable throughout the period considered except for 2004, when it was 5 % higher than in 2002 and 2003.
Potrošnja je bila v obravnavanem obdobju sorazmerno stabilna, razen leta 2004, ko je bila 5 % višja kot leta 2002 in 2003.
Source: Investigation, Eurostat, complaint.
Vir: preiskava, Eurostat, pritožba.
The volume of imports of the product concerned from the country concerned into the Community rose by 87 %, from around 22000 tonnes in 2002 to around 42000 tonnes in the IP.
Obseg uvoza zadevnega proizvoda iz zadevne države v Skupnost se je povečal za 87 % s približno 22000 ton leta 2002 na približno 42000 ton v OP.
It rose by 58 % in 2003, by a further 40 percentage points in 2004, before declining by 11 percentage points in the IP.
Leta 2003 se je povečal za 58 %, leta 2004 za dodatnih 40 odstotnih točk in se potem v OP zmanjšal za 11 odstotnih točk.
Price of imports from Thailand (EUR/tonnes)
Cena uvoza iz Tajske (v EUR/tono)
The market share held by exporters in the country concerned increased by around 6 percentage points during the period considered, from 6,8 % in 2002 to 12,7 % in the IP.
Tržni delež, ki so ga imeli izvozniki v zadevni državi, se je med obravnavanim obdobjem povečal za približno 6 odstotnih točk, tj. s 6,8 % leta 2002 na 12,7 % v OP.
In detail, Thai exporters gained almost 4 percentage points in 2003, a further 2 percentage points in 2004 and practically stabilised at that level in the IP.
Natančneje povedano so tajski izvozniki pridobili skoraj 4 odstotne točke leta 2003 in dodatni 2 odstotni točki leta 2004 ter se dejansko ustalili na tej ravni v OP.
Between 2002 and the IP, the average price of imports of the product concerned originating in the country concerned declined by 13 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je povprečna cena uvoženega zadevnega proizvoda s poreklom iz zadevne države znižala za 13 %.
Specifically, prices declined by 10 % in 2003 and by a further 3 % in 2004, before stabilising at that price (i.e. around 690 EUR/tonne) in the IP.
Natančneje so se cene zmanjšale za 10 % leta 2003 in dodatne 3 % leta 2004, preden so se ustalile na tej ceni (tj. na približno 690 EUR/tono) v OP.
A price comparison for similar product types was made between the exporting producers' and the Community industry's selling prices in the Community.
Izvedena je bila primerjava cen za podobne vrste proizvodov med prodajnimi cenami proizvajalcev izvoznikov in industrije Skupnosti v Skupnosti.
To this end, Community industry’s ex-works prices, net of all rebates and taxes have been compared with the cif Community frontier prices of exporting producers of the country concerned, duly adjusted for conventional duties, unloading and customs clearance costs.
Zato je bila izvedena primerjava med cenami franko tovarna brez vseh rabatov in davkov industrije Skupnosti ter cenami CIF meja Skupnosti proizvajalcev izvoznikov zadevne države, ki so bile ustrezno prilagojene za konvencionalne dajatve, stroške raztovarjanja in carinjenja.
The comparison showed that during the IP the product concerned originating in the country concerned sold in the Community undercut the Community industry's prices by between 2 % and 10 %, depending on the exporting producer concerned, with the exception of two sampled exporting producers for which no undercutting was found.
Primerjava je pokazala, da je zadevni proizvod s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki se je prodajal v Skupnosti, nelojalno znižal cene industrije Skupnosti od 2 % do 10 % v OP, kar je bilo odvisno od zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika, razen dveh vzorčenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, za katera ni bilo ugotovljeno nelojalno nižanje cen.
However, on a type-by-type basis it was found that in some instances, prices offered by the exporting producers concerned were significantly lower than the above average undercutting margins.
Kljub temu je bilo na podlagi obravnave glede na vrsto proizvoda ugotovljeno, da so bile v nekaterih primerih cene zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov znatno nižje od zgornje povprečne stopnje nelojalno znižanih cen.
(49 ) Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila vse pomembne gospodarske dejavnike in pokazatelje, ki vplivajo na položaj industrije Skupnosti.
This market is inter alia characterised by the existence of two sales channels, i.e. sales under the producer's own brand and sales under retailer's brand.
Za ta trg sta med drugim značilni dve prodajni poti, tj. prodaja z blagovno znamko proizvajalca in prodaja z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno.
Sales under the first channel will usually trigger higher selling costs intended notably for marketing and advertising, and will also command higher selling prices.
Prodaja po prvi poti običajno povzroči višje prodajne stroške, običajno za trženje in oglaševanje, ter zahteva tudi višje prodajne cene.
The investigation evidenced that all imports from the cooperating Thai exporters pertained to the retailer's brand channel.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bil celoten uvoz sodelujočih tajskih izvoznikov povezan s prodajno potjo z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno.
It was considered appropriate to distinguish in the injury analysis between Community industry's sales under its own brand and under the retailer's brand wherever relevant, as competition from dumped imports is faced in the first place by Community industry's like products sold under the retailer's brand.
Zdelo se je primerno, da se v analizi škode loči med prodajo industrije Skupnosti z lastno blagovno znamko in z znamko prodajalca na drobno, kadar je to pomembno, ker je konkurenca dampinškega uvoza najbolj izpostavljena podobnim izdelkom industrije Skupnosti, ki se prodajajo z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno.
This distinction was done in particular for the determination of sales volumes, sales prices and profitability.
Takšna razlika se je uporabljala zlasti za določitev obsega prodaje, prodajnih cen in dobičkonosnosti.
However, for the sake of completeness, totals (including both own brand and retailer's brand) are also shown and commented.
Vendar pa so zaradi popolnosti prikazani in pojasnjeni tudi skupni podatki (vključno z lastno blagovno znamko in blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno).
During the IP, Community industry's sales under the retailer's brand accounted for around 63 % of the total Community industry's sales (own and retailer's brand).
Med OP je prodaja industrije Skupnosti z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno predstavljala približno 63 % celotne prodaje industrije Skupnosti (lastna blagovna znamka in blagovna znamka prodajalca na drobno).
From a level of around 257000 tonnes in 2002, the Community industry’s production decreased almost steadily during the period considered.
Proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti se je med obravnavanim obdobjem s približno 257000 ton leta 2002 skoraj enakomerno zniževala.
In the IP, it was 16 % lower than in 2002.
V OP je bila za 16 % nižja kot leta 2002.
Specifically, it declined by 6 % in 2003, increased slightly by 3 percentage points in 2004, before decreasing again sharply by 13 percentage points in the IP.
Natančneje se je zmanjšala za 6 % leta 2003, nekoliko povečala za 3 odstotne točke leta 2004 in se potem ponovno precej zmanjšala za 13 odstotnih točk v OP.
Source: Investigation.
Vir: preiskava.
Production capacity was around 276000 tonnes in 2002, and around 293000 in the IP.
Proizvodna zmogljivost je znašala približno 276000 ton leta 2002 in približno 293000 ton v OP.
In detail, the production capacity first increased by 9 % in 2003, before declining by 3 percentage points in 2004.
Natančneje se je proizvodna zmogljivost najprej povečala za 9 % leta 2003 in se potem zmanjšala za 3 odstotne točke leta 2004.
It stayed at this level in the IP.
V OP je ostala na tej ravni.
Between 2002 and the IP, it rose by 6 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je povečala za 6 %.
The increase of 2003 was due essentially to an increase in capacity of one particular producer, intended to serve non-EU markets.
Proizvodnja se je leta 2003 povečala zlasti zaradi povečanja zmogljivosti enega od proizvajalcev, ki je bilo namenjeno izpolnjevanju potreb trgov zunaj EU.
This increase was somewhat offset in 2004 by closures implemented by other Community producers.
To povečanje se je delno izravnalo leta 2004 z zaprtjem proizvodnje drugih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Capacity utilisation was 93 % in 2002.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti je bila 93 % leta 2002.
It declined to 81 % in 2003, increased again to 85 % in 2004, before declining markedly to 74 % in the IP.
Leta 2003 se je zmanjšala na 81 % in se potem ponovno povečala na 85 % leta 2004, preden se je znatno zmanjšala na 74 % v OP.
This reflects the decreasing production and sales volume as described in recitals 52, 56 and 57.
To zmanjšanje je posledica manjše proizvodnje in obsega prodaje, navedenega v uvodnih izjavah (52), (56) in (57).
The level of closing stocks of the Community industry increased by 2 % in 2003, by a further 10 percentage points in 2004, before declining by 14 percentage points the IP.
Raven končnih zalog industrije Skupnosti se je povečala za 2 % leta 2003, za dodatnih 10 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in se potem zmanjšala za 14 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s stocks stood at around 170000 tonnes.
Med OP so zaloge industrije Skupnosti znašale približno 170000 ton.
All in all, the inventory level in the IP was very close to that of 2002.
Na splošno je bila raven zalog v OP zelo podobna ravni iz leta 2002.
It should be noted however, that the level of inventories is not a meaningful indicator of injury for this particular industry, as it produces to order.
Kljub temu pa je treba opozoriti, da raven zaloge ni jasen kazalnik škode za to industrijo, ker je zanjo značilna proizvodnja po naročilu.
The high level of inventories at the end of each year (around 75 % of the annual production volume) is linked to the fact that the harvest and the canning typically end in October each year.
Visoka raven zalog na koncu vsakega leta (približno 75 % letnega obsega proizvodnje) je povezana s tem, da se žetev in konzerviranje običajno končata oktobra vsako leto.
Stocks are therefore goods awaiting dispatching during the period November to July.
Zaloga je zato blago za odpremo v obdobju od novembra do julija.
The sales volume by the Community industry of its own production intended for the retailer's brand on the Community market to unrelated customers first increased by 4 % in 2003, declined by 11 percentage points in 2004, and stayed at this level in the IP.
Obseg prodaje lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, ki je namenjena za blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno, na trgu Skupnosti nepovezanim strankam se je najprej povečal za 4 % leta 2003, zmanjšal za 11 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in ostal na enaki ravni v OP.
Between 2002 and the IP, these sales declined by around 7 %, starting from a level of around 125000 tonnes in 2002.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je takšna prodaja s približno 125000 ton leta 2002 zmanjšala za približno 7 %.
EC Sales volume (retailer's brand) to unrelated customers (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje ES (z blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno) nepovezanim strankam (v tonah)
EC Sales volume (own and retailer's brand) to unrelated customers (tonnes)
Obseg prodaje ES (z lastno blagovno znamko in blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno) nepovezanim strankam (v tonah)
Total (both own and retailer's brand) Community industry's sales volumes of its own production on the Community market to unrelated customers followed more or less a similar pattern, although slightly less pronounced.
Gibanje celotnega obsega prodaje (lastna blagovna znamka in blagovna znamka prodajalca na drobno) lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti nepovezanim strankam je bilo bolj ali manj podobno zgornjemu, le da je bilo nekoliko manj izrazito.
From a starting level of around 194000 tonnes in 2002, they first increased by 2 % in 2003, declined by 4 percentage points in 2004, and declined further by 3 percentage points in the IP.
Z začetne ravni približno 194000 ton leta 2002 se je obseg takšne prodaje najprej povečal za 2 % leta 2003 ter se potem zmanjšal za 4 odstotne točke leta 2004 in za dodatne 3 odstotne točke v OP.
Between 2002 and the IP, these sales declined by around 5 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je takšna prodaja zmanjšala za približno 5 %.
The market share held by the Community industry rose from 58,5 % in 2002 to 59,7 % in 2003, before declining suddenly to 54,4 % in 2004.
Tržni delež, ki ga je imela industrija Skupnosti, se je povečal z 58,5 % leta 2002 na 59,7 % leta 2003 ter se potem nenadoma zmanjšal na 54,4 % leta 2004.
During the IP, it somewhat recovered to 55,9 %.
Med OP se je nekoliko povečal na 55,9 %.
Over the period considered, the Community industry lost 2,6 percentage points of market share.
V obravnavanem obdobju je industrija Skupnosti izgubila 2,6 odstotne točke tržnega deleža.
Market share of the Community industry (own and retailer's brand)
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti (z lastno blagovno znamko in blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno)
Between 2002 and the IP, when the Community consumption remained flat, the volume of sales intended for the retailer's brand of the Community industry on the Community market decreased by around 7 %, whilst the volume of Community industry's sales intended for both own and retailer's brand on the Community market decreased by around 5 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP, ko se potrošnja Skupnosti ni bistveno spreminjala, se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti, ki je namenjena za blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno, na trgu Skupnosti zmanjšal za približno 7 %, medtem ko se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti, ki je namenjena za lastno blagovno znamko in blagovno znamko prodajalca na drobno, na trgu Skupnosti zmanjšal za približno 5 %.
Between 2002 and the IP, the Community industry lost around 2,6 percentage points of market share, whereas dumped imports gained around 6 percentage points of market share, corresponding to an increase of approximately 20000 tonnes sold on the Community market.
Med letom 2002 in OP je industrija Skupnosti izgubila približno 2,6 odstotne točke tržnega deleža, dampinški uvoz pa je pridobil približno 6 odstotnih točk tržnega deleža, kar ustreza povečanju prodaje na trgu Skupnosti za približno 20000 ton.
It is thus concluded that the Community industry could not benefit from any growth.
Zato se sklene, da industrija Skupnosti ni mogla izkoristiti rasti.
The employment level of the Community industry first increased by 9 % between 2002 and 2003, declined by 11 percentage points in 2004, and declined further by 4 percentage points in the IP.
Stopnja zaposlovanja v industriji Skupnosti se je najprej povečala za 9 % med letoma 2002 in 2003 ter potem zmanjšala za 11 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in še za 4 odstotne točke v OP.