natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, infact that Regulation recognised the existence of price competition between these two products.
Dejstvo pa je, da je Uredba prepoznala obstoj cenovne konkurenčnosti med tema dvema proizvodoma.
In consequence, the argument that frozen salmon is a different product to fresh salmon had to be rejected.
Posledično je bilo treba zavrniti argument, da je zamrznjen losos različen proizvod od svežega.
Therefore, it is considered that farmed (other than wild) salmon (whether fresh, chilled or frozen) in the different preparations described is a single product.
Tako je gojeni losos (za razliko od divjega lososa) (sveži, ohlajeni ali zamrznjeni) pripravljen na različne, že opisane načine, en proizvod.
It is currently classified within CN codes ex03021200, ex03031100, ex03031900, ex03032200, ex03041013 and ex03042013.
Trenutno je razvrščen pod oznake KN ex03021200, ex03031100, ex03031900, ex03032200, ex03041013 in ex03042013.
An examination has been undertaken to establish whether the product produced by the Community producers — i.e. farmed salmon (hereinafter referred to as ‘the like product’) is like or directly competitive with the imported product concerned.
Pripravljena je bila proučitev za ugotavljanje, ali je proizvod proizvajalcev Skupnosti – tj. gojen losos (v nadaljevanju „podobni proizvod“) podoben ali neposredno konkurenčen zadevnim uvoženim proizvodom.
In reaching a determination, the following findings in particular were taken into account.
Pri sprejemu odločitve so bile upoštevane zlasti naslednje ugotovitve:
the imported product and the Community product share the same international classification for tariff purposes at HS code level (6 digits).
uvoženi proizvod in proizvod Skupnosti si delita enako mednarodno razvrstitev carinskih tarif na ravni oznake HS (6 števk).
The domestic product is often marketed as a premium quality product and often enjoys a price premium at the retail level.
Domači proizvod je velikokrat predstavljen kot prvovrsten proizvod in ima v prodaji na drobno visoko ceno.
However, ‘likeness’ does not require products to be completely identical, and the minor variations in quality are not sufficient to change the overall finding of likeness between the imported and domestic products;
Vendar pa „podobnost“ ne zahteva, da sta proizvoda popolnoma identična. Manjša odstopanja pri kakovosti še ne spremenijo skupnih ugotovitev o podobnosti med uvoženimi in domačimi proizvodi;
the imported product and the Community product were sold via similar or identical sales channels, price information was readily available to buyers and the product concerned and the product of the Community producers competed mainly on price;
uvoženi proizvod in proizvod Skupnosti sta bila prodajana preko podobnih ali enakih prodajnih poti, kupcem so bile informacije o ceni na voljo in zadevni proizvod ter proizvod Skupnosti sta si konkurenčna le glede na ceno;
the imported product and the Community product both serve the same or similar end-uses, they were, therefore, alternative or substitute products and were easily interchangeable;
tako uvoženi proizvod kot proizvod Skupnosti sta namenjena enaki ali podobni končni porabi, zato sta bila alternativna oziroma nadomestna proizvoda in medsebojno zamenljiva;
the imported product and the Community product were both perceived by consumers as alternatives to satisfy a particular want or demand, in this respect the differences identified by certain exporters and importers were simply minor variations.
uvoženi proizvod in proizvod Skupnosti zadovoljujeta določene želje ali zahteve kupce in zato so razlike, ki jih navajajo nekateri izvozniki in uvozniki, le manjša razhajanja.
Therefore, the conclusion reached is that the imported product and the Community product are ‘like or directly competitive’.
Zato dosežen sklep določa, da sta uvoženi proizvod in proizvod Skupnosti „podobno ali neposredno konkurenčna“.
An examination has been undertaken based on data for the period 2000 to 2003, focussing on imports in the most recent period for which reliable data are available, to establish whether the product concerned is imported into the Community in such greatly increased quantities, absolute or relative to total Community production, and/or on such terms or conditions as to cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to the Community producers.
Pregled na podlagi podatkov za obdobje med leti 2000 in 2003 je bil opravljen, ki se osredotoča na zadnje obdobje, za katerega so na voljo podatki in s pomočjo katerega bodo ugotovili, ali je zadevni proizvod uvožen v Skupnost v tako zelo povečani količini, absolutno ali relativno povezan s proizvodnjo Skupnosti in/ali pod takimi pogoji, ki bi proizvajalcem utegnili povzročiti resno škodo.
However, the investigation showed that although Eurostat data does not distinguish between wild and farmed salmon, the available information (US and Canadian export statistics) indicates that imports of wild salmon to the Community have in fact decreased since 2001.
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da čeprav podatki Eurostata ne razlikujejo med divjim in gojenim lososom, razpoložljive informacije (ameriška in kanadska izvozna statistika) kažejo, da je uvoz divjega lososa v Skupnost od leta 2001 dejansko padel.
Therefore, the inclusion of imports of all salmon in the Eurostat data did not cause the increase in imports observed in those data.
Tako vključitev uvoza lososa v podatke Eurostata ni povzročil zmanjšanja uvoza, ki je razviden iz tistih podatkov.
One party also claimed that 2000 was an inappropriate base year for the analysis undertaken, claiming that salmon prices were unusually high in that year.
Ena stran je tudi trdila, da je bilo leto 2000 neprimerno leto za osnovo opravljene analize, ker so bile takrat cene lososa nenavadno visoke.
However, the analysis focuses on the key developments in the most recent period, and changing the base year to 1999 or 2001 would not change the outcome of that analysis.
Vendar se analiza osredotoča na ključne razvoje v zadnjem obdobju in sprememba osnove z leta 2000 na leto 1999 ali 2001 ne bi spremenila rezultata analize.
The definitive findings set out below are thus based on the data from 2000 to 2003.
Dokončne ugotovitve, ki so navedene spodaj, so pripravljene na osnovi podatkov za obdobje 2000–2003.
Year on year increase
Letno povečanje
Total Community Production
Skupna proizvodnja Skupnosti
Imports/Production
Uvozi/proizvodnja
Imports increased from 372789 tonnes in 2000 to 455948 tonnes in 2003, an increase of 22 %.
Uvoz je narasel z 372789 ton leta 2000 na 455948 ton leta 2003, kar predstavlja 22 % povečanje.
Relative to Community production, imports fell from 254 % in 2000 to 235 % in 2001, but have since increased again to 239 % in 2003.
V povezavi s proizvodnjo Skupnosti je uvoz padel z 254 % leta 2000 na 235 % leta 2001, a je od takrat spet narasel na 239 % leta 2003.
Although this represents a reduction compared to 2000, it is noted that following a dip in 2001, imports have increased relative to production in each year since.
Čeprav to predstavlja znižanje v primerjavi z letom 2000, je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je po padcu leta 2001 uvoz od takrat relativno povečal s proizvodnjo vsakega leta.
In addition, it is recalled that in 2003 there was an absolute increase in imports of 15 %, a much higher rate of increase than in previous years.
Poleg tega je leta 2003 prišlo do absolutnega porasta uvoza v višini 15 %, kar je veliko višja stopnja povečanja kot v prejšnjih letih.
Based on the import data for the period from 2000 to 2003, it is concluded that there is a recent, sudden, sharp and significant increase in imports, both absolute and relative to production.
Na podlagi uvoznih podatkov za obdobje od 2000 do 2003, je sklenjeno, da je prišlo do nenadnega in opaznega porasta uvoza v zadnjem času, tako absolutno kot relativno povezano s proizvodnjo.
Prices of imports
Cene uvoza
In this regard, it should be noted that between September 1997 and May 2003, a significant proportion of imports of farmed salmon from Norway (which holds around 55 % of the Community market) were subject to price undertakings in the context of the then existing anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures.
V tej zvezi je treba omeniti, da je bila med septembrom 1997 in majem 2003 večja količina gojenega lososa z Norveške (ki obsega približno 55 % trga Skupnosti) predmet cenovnih obvez v okviru takrat obstoječih protidampinških in protisubvencijskih ukrepov.
In the course of 2002, violations of these price undertakings by certain Norwegian exporting producers began to undermine the effectiveness of that instrument and caused price falls.
V teku leta 2002 je kršitev teh cen, ki so jo izvajali nekateri norveški izvozniki, začela spodkopavati učinkovitost tega instrumenta in povzročila padec cen.
The proposed termination of the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy measures against imports from Norway was then announced in December 2002 and those measures were terminated in May 2003.
Predlagana ukinitev protidampinških in protisubvencijskih ukrepov za Norveško je bila razglašena za december 2002, dejansko pa so bili ukrepi ukinjeni maja 2003.
Import prices during 2002 and the first half of 2003 fell partly due to violation of, or voluntary withdrawal from, the price undertakings by some Norwegian exporters.
Uvozne cene so v letu 2002 in prvi polovici 2003 padle zaradi kršitve ali prostovoljnega umika cenovnih obvez s strani nekaterih norveških izvoznikov.
Having remained relatively stable at between EUR 2,83 and EUR 2,93 in 2002, import prices dropped from EUR 2,87 in Q1 2003 to EUR 2,24 in Q3 2003 before making a partial recovery to EUR 2,48 in Q4 2003.
Če so bile cene v letu 2002 relativno stabilne med 2,83 EUR in 2,93 EUR, v prvem četrtletju so z 2,87 EUR padle na 2,24 EUR in v zadnjem četrtletju leta 2003 zopet narasle na 2,48 EUR. Vir: Eurostat
Eurostat data for the first semester of 2004 indicate that prices initially increased albeit remaining below their average in 2003, but then followed a downward trend.
Podatki Eurostata za prvo četrtletje leta 2004 kažejo, da so se cene na začetku povišale, čeprav so ostale pod povprečjem leta 2003, a so kasneje cene ponovno padle.
The latest available information indicates that prices are continuing to follow a downward trend and are very low.
Zadnje informacije, ki so na voljo, kažejo, da cene še naprej padajo in so zelo nizke.
Despite some claims that prices would increase, these have not been substantiated and the current extremely low prices are confirmed by industry sources in exporting countries.
Kljub nekaterim trditvam, da bodo cene narasle, te trditve niso bile utemeljene in trenutno izredno nizke cene potrjujejo industrijski viri v državah izvoznicah.
The market share of imports fell from 73,5 % in 2000 to 71,9 % in 2001, and remained stable at about this level in 2002 (72 %).
Delež uvoza je padel s 73,5 % v letu 2000 na 71,9 % v letu 2001 in ostal stabilen v letu 2002 (72 %).
In 2003, imports increased their market share from 72,0 % in 2002 to 73,9 %, an increase of 1,9 percentage points and their highest level in the period considered.
Delež uvoza se je povečal z 72,0 % v letu 2002 na 73,9 % v letu 2003; dosežen je bil torej največji delež v omenjenem obdobju, saj se je slednji povečal za 1,9 odstotne točke.
Almost all production of the product concerned in the Community was in Scotland and Ireland, although there are also two producers in France and at least one in Latvia.
Skoraj vsa proizvodnja zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnosti je bila proizvedena na Škotskem in Irskem, čeprav sta dva proizvajalca iz Franciji in vsaj eden iz Latvije.
In the year 2003, total Community production of the product concerned was 190903 tonnes, of which the producers which co-operated fully in the provisional stage of the investigation accounted for 85231 tonnes, equivalent to 45 % of the total Community production.
V letu 2003 je bila skupna proizvodnja zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnosti 190903 ton, ob tem je treba povedati, da so proizvajalci sodelovali v začasnem obdobju raziskave, v katero je bilo vključenih 85231 ton zadevnega proizvoda, kar ustreza 45 % skupne proizvodnje Skupnosti.
They therefore represent a major proportion of total Community production within the meaning of Article 5(3)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 and Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 519/94.
Tako torej zadevni proizvod predstavlja večinski delež skupne proizvodnje Skupnosti v okviru člena 5(3)(c) Uredbe (ES) št. 3285/94 in člena 15(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 549/94.
They are accordingly considered as the Community producers.
Ustrezno se obravnavajo kot proizvajalci Skupnosti za namene začasnih določb.
Towards the end of 2002, Norwegian forecasts of their overall salmon production in 2003 were around 446000 tonnes.
Proti koncu leta 2002 je Norveška ocenila skupno letno proizvodnjo proizvodov iz lososa za leto 2003 na približno 446000 ton.
By February 2003, Kontali Analyse (an industry information provider) was forecasting harvesting of 475000 tonnes.
Februarja 2003 je Kontali Analyse (ponudnik informacij za industrijo) napovedoval ulov 475000 ton proizvodov iz lososa.
This was 30000 tonnes higher than Norwegian production in 2002, but it was expected that most of this increase would be directed to emerging markets such as Russia and Poland and to markets in the Far East such as Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan and China.
To je za 30000 ton več, kot je proizvodov iz lososa proizvedla norveška proizvodnja v letu 2002, vendar je bilo pričakovati, da bo večina tega presežka namenjena na novo nastale trge, kot so Rusija, Poljska ter na trge na Daljnem vzhodu, kot so Japonska, Hongkong, Tajvan in Kitajska.
Infact, actual Norwegian production in 2003 was 509000 (around 63000 tonnes higher than had been forecast by the Norwegian Government), and harvesting was 6 % higher than Kontali’s harvesting forecast.
Dejanska norveška proizvodnja v letu 2003 je bila 509000 ton proizvodov iz lososa (približno 63000 ton več, kot je napovedala norveška vlada) ulova pa je bilo za 6 % več, kot ga je napovedal Kontali.
At the same time, far from reversing the decline in sales in the Far East, the rate of decline actually accelerated to – 6,0 %.
V istem času, daleč od obrata negative rasti prodaje na Daljnem vzhodu, je stopnja negativne rasti padla na – 6,0 %.
In addition, growth in emerging markets also declined — from 47 % to 32 % in the case of Russia, and from 50 % to 30 % in the case of European countries outwith the Community.
Poleg tega je rast na novo nastalih trgih prav tako padla – z 47 % na 32 % v Rusiji in s 50 % na 30 % v evropskih državah zunaj Skupnosti.
Indeed, overall global consumption grew by only 6 % compared to 9 % in 2002 and 14 % in 2001.
Globalna poraba je narasla le za 6 % v primerjavi z 9 % v letu 2002 in 14 % v letu 2001.
In consequence, Norway experienced a serious problem of over-production, a problem which it appeared to recognise.
Posledično je Norveška naletela na resen problem presežne proizvodnje.
However, this idea was later abandoned and the market continued to be over-supplied.
Vendar so to idejo kasneje opustili, zato je bil trg še naprej prezaseden.
The measures had in large part taken the form of minimum import prices (‘MIPs’), which in effect guaranteed a minimum price for exporting producers.
Ukrepi so bili v glavnem v obliki minimalnih uvoznih cen („MIP“), ki so dejansko zagotavile minimalno ceno za proizvajalce izvoznike.
This created a vicious circle which led to an increase in harvesting, further pressure on prices and increased pressure to export.
Tako se je ustvaril začaran krog, ki je vodil k povišanju izkoriščanja lososov in nadaljnjemu pritisku na cene in izvoz.
Although some temporary and small adjustment of import prices was to be expected as a result of the termination of the measures against Norway, the extent of the fall in prices (exacerbated by the problem of over-production) and the vicious circle which that created because of the operation of the banking system described above, were unforeseen.
Čeprav je bilo nekatere začasne in male prilagoditve uvoznih cen pričakovati kot rezultat preklica ukrepov proti Norveški, sta razpon padca cen (poslabšanje težav glede presežne proizvodnje) in začaran krog, ki so ga ustvarile dejavnosti opisanega bančnega sistema, nepredvidljiva.
During 2003, the value of the Norwegian kroner fell by 13 % relative to the euro, by 12 % relative to the Danish krone and by 14 % relative to the Swedish krone.
V letu 2003 je vrednost norveške krone padla za 13 % glede na euro, 12 % glede na dansko krono in za 14 % glede na švedsko krono.
Although currency movements are to be expected, these were relatively large and sustained fluctuations and outwith the normal range of currency fluctuations.
Čeprav so bile spremembe tečaja pričakovane, so bile te vseeno velike, nihanja pa so bila zunaj normalnega okvira nihanja tečajev.
Although the euro also strengthened by comparison to the British pound, the British pound fell by only 6 % making farmed salmon produced in the United Kingdom more expensive in the euro-zone relative to Norwegian imports than it had been at the beginning of that year.
Čeprav je bil v primerjavi z britanskim funtom euro močnejši, je britanski funt padel le za 6 % in tako v evropskem prostoru, v primerjavi z uvozom Norveške z začetka leta, dvignil cene gojenega lososa, proizvedenega v Združenem kraljestvu.
In addition, over half of the farmed salmon imported to Denmark, and almost all of that imported to Poland and other new Member States, is re-sold in the euro-zone after processing.
Poleg tega je več kot polovica gojenega lososa, uvoženega na Dansko, in skoraj vsa količina, uvožena na Poljsko in ostale nove države članice predelana in nato prodana znotraj euro območja.
In consequence, the fall in the value of the Norwegian kroner relative to the euro had an effect not only on Norwegian imports directly to the euro-zone, but also on imports to those countries such as Denmark and Poland which process farmed salmon to re-sell in the euro-zone.
Posledično je imel padec vrednosti norveške krone, povezan z eurom, posledice ne le neposredno za uvoz iz Norveške v euro območje, ampak tudi za uvoz v druge države, kot sta Danska in Poljska, ki predelata gojenega lososa in ga prodajata v euro območju.
The effect of these currency movements was to make the European Community market as a whole more attractive to Norwegian exporting producers, to some extent insulating them from the effect of a decrease in their prices in euro and krone, and helping them to maintain their export revenues in their domestic currency.
Učinek teh tečajnih razlik je bil posledica namena narediti trg Evropske skupnosti bolj privlačen za norveške proizvajalce izvoznike in jih do neke mere izolirali pred učinki padca cen v evrih in kronah ter jim tako pomagali vzdrževati prihodke iz izvoza v domači valuti.
At the same time, these currency movements made imported salmon cheaper in the European Community and made importing more attractive to importers and users such as the processing industry.
V istem obdobju so ta nihanja valut znižala cene lososa v Evropski skupnosti in tako naredila bolj privlačne pogoje za uvoznike in uporabnike predelovalne industrije.
One party argued that overproduction abroad does not necessarily lead to increased imports to the Community.
Ena stranka je trdila, da presežna proizvodnja v tujini ne vodi nujno k povečanemu uvozu v Skupnost.
Whilst this is true in abstract terms, the investigation shows that in this specific case the overproduction did lead to an increase in imports to the Community.
Medtem ko je to v teoriji resnično, preiskava kaže, da v tem posebnem primeru presežna proizvodnja ni vodila do povečanja uvoza v Skupnost.
It was also argued that the removal of trade measures and exchange rate fluctuations are both foreseeable.
Dokazovalo se je tudi, da je mogoče predvideti tako ukinitev trgovinskih ukrepov kot nihanje deviznih tečajev.
However, the profound effect of the removal of trade measures combined with relatively large and sustained fluctuations in exchange rates was not foreseeable.
Vendar pa ni bil predvidljiv temeljit učinek ukinitve trgovinskih ukrepov skupaj z relativno velikimi in trajnimi nihanji deviznih tečajev.
Therefore it is concluded that the unforeseen development which caused the increase in imports was significant over-production in Norway (despite lower forecasts), exacerbated by the failure of the Norwegian industry to achieve forecast growth in exports to markets outwith the Community, the unexpected extent of the effects of the termination of trade defence measures against Norway and the operation of the Norwegian banking system as described above, together with the rise in the value of the euro which made the Community market an unusually attractive destination for Norwegian exports.
Zato se je ugotovilo, da je bil nepredvidljivi potek, ki je povzročil povečanje uvoza, presežna proizvodnja v Norveški (kljub nizkim napovedim), neuspeh norveške industrije pri doseganju napovedanega izvoza na trge zunaj Skupnosti in nepričakovan porast učinkov zaradi prenehanja ukrepov trgovinske zaščite proti Norveški ter proti dejavnostim norveškega bančnega sistema, opisanega zgoraj, skupaj s porastom vrednosti eura, ki je trg Skupnosti naredil še bolj privlačnega za norveške izvoznike.
In order to make a determination of serious injury to the Community producers of the like product, an evaluation of all relevant factors of an objective and quantifiable nature having a bearing on their situation has been undertaken.
Da bi lahko določili resno škodo, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti podobnega proizvoda, je bilo treba izvesti vrednotenje vseh pomembnih dejavnikov objektivne in kvantitativne narave, ob upoštevanju njihove situacije.
In particular, for the product concerned, an evaluation has been carried out of the development of global Community data for consumption, production capacity, production, capacity utilisation, employment, productivity, overall sales and market share.
Zaradi zadevnega proizvoda je bilo izvedeno vrednotenje razvoja globalnih podatkov Skupnosti o porabi, proizvodni zmogljivosti, izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, zaposlitvi, produktivnosti, skupni prodaji in tržnem deležu.
As concerns company specific data, these are based upon data provided by the co-operating Community producers on cash flow, return on capital employed, stocks, price, undercutting and profitability for the years 2000 to 2003.
Podatki, specifični za posamezna podjetja, so pridobljeni s sodelovanjem proizvajalcev Skupnosti v zvezi s tokom denarja, donosom naložbenega kapitala, delnicami, cenami, z zbijanjem in donosnostjo v obdobju od 2000 do 2003.
It should be noted at the outset that in the Community salmon farming industry, as elsewhere, there is a long and relatively inflexible production cycle leading to harvesting and that, once harvested, the farmed salmon must be sold immediately since they can only be stored for a few days unless frozen.
Na začetku je treba opozoriti, da je v industriji gojenja lososa v Skupnosti, tako kot drugod, dolg in relativno neprilagodljiv proizvodni cikel, ki vodi k odprodaji in k temu, da ko je enkrat losos ulovljen, se mora takoj prodati, ker je lahko shranjen le nekaj dni, če se ne zamrzne.
Analysis of the situation of the Community Producers
Analiza položaja proizvajalcev Skupnosti
year on year increase
letnega povečanja
Consumption of the product concerned in the Community was established on the basis of the total production by all producers in the Community and total imports of the product concerned into the Community as reported by Eurostat, less European Community exports.
Poraba zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnosti je bila ugotovljena na podlagi skupne proizvodnje vseh proizvajalcev Skupnosti in vsega uvoza zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnost, na podlagi podatkov, ki jih navaja Eurostat, vendar brez upoštevanja izvoza Evropske skupnosti.
Between 2000 and 2003, consumption in the Community increased by 21,7 % from 507705 tonnes to 618038 tonnes.
Med leti 2000 in 2003 je poraba Skupnosti narasla za 21,7 %, s 507705 ton na 618038 ton.
Production capacity and capacity utilisation of the Community producers
Proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti proizvajalcev Skupnosti
Capacity Utilisation
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti