natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If a measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements, use separate rows.
Če je ukrep sestavljen iz več obrokov in povračil, prosimo, uporabite ločene vrste.
Date or dates on which individual instalments of aid have been put at the disposal of the recipient.
Datum(i), ko so upravičencu posamezni obroki pomoči bili dani na razpolago.
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the recipient, in gross grant equivalents.
Znesek, ki je bil upravičencu dan na razpolago (v bruto ekvivalentih pomoči).
Date or dates on which individual instalments of the aid were repaid by the recipient.
Datum(i), ko je upravičenec posamezne obroke pomoči povrnil.
Date or dates on which the aid was repaid.
Datum(i), ko je pomoč bila povrnjena.
On 20 August 2003 the five-year repayment period started. Repayment was on a straight-line basis and in equal half-yearly instalments, interest being due on the balance outstanding.
avgusta 2003 se je začelo petletno obdobja odplačevanja, ki mora potekati enakomerno, v enakih polletnih delih, pri tem pa se obresti zaračunavajo na preostanek dolga.
The Commission replied by letter D/53949 of 18 June 2003. A further communication was sent the same day, via e-mail to the complainant informing it promptly that publication had just taken place.
Komisija je odgovorila v pismu D/53949 z dne 18.6.2003, na isti dan pa je bilo tožniku po elektronski pošti poslano tudi sporočilo, da je pravkar prišlo do objave.
‘Export aid’ is defined in the 1996 de minimis notice as ‘any aid directly linked to the quantities exported, to the establishment and operation of a distribution network or to current expenditure linked to the export activity’. This definition is reproduced, almost unchanged, in Article 1(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001.
„Izvozna pomoč“ je že bila odobrena v de minimis obvestilu iz leta 1996, kot „kakršna koli pomoč, neposredno povezana z izvoženimi količinami, z ustanovitvijo in delovanjem distribucijskega omrežja ali s trenutnimi stroški, povezanimi z izvozno dejavnostjo.“ Skoraj nespremenjena je bila ponatisnjena v točki b) člena 1 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001.
setting up a High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries
o ustanovitvi skupine strokovnjakov na visoki ravni za digitalne knjižnice
(This text annuls and replaces the text published in Official Journal L 46 of 16 February 2006, p. 32)
(To besedilo preklicuje in nadomešča besedilo, objavljeno v Uradnem listu L 46 z dne 16. februarja 2006, str. 32)
The Communication from the Commission ‘i2010: Digital Libraries’ [2] (hereafter ‘the Communication’) announced the creation of a High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries that will advise the Commission on how to best address the organisational, legal and technical challenges at European level.
Sporočilo Komisije „i2010: Digitalne knjižnice“ [2] (v nadaljevanju „sporočilo“) je napovedalo oblikovanje skupine strokovnjakov na visoki ravni za digitalne knjižnice, ki bodo Komisiji svetovali, kako na evropski ravni najbolje rešiti organizacijske, pravne in tehnične težave.
The White Paper on a European Communication Policy [3] adopted by the Commission on 1 February 2006 mentions the essential role that digital libraries can play in providing free access to European citizens to information on Europe through information technologies.
V Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki [3], ki jo je Komisija sprejela 1. februarja 2006, je navedeno, da je najpomembnejša vloga digitalnih knjižnic v tem, da omogočajo evropskim državljanom s pomočjo informacijskih tehnologij prost dostop do informacij o Evropi.
The ‘High Level Expert Group on Digital Libraries’ therefore has to be set up and its terms of reference and structure detailed,
Zato je treba ustanoviti „skupino strokovnjakov za digitalne knjižnice na visoki ravni“ in podrobno določiti njene pristojnosti in sestavo –
Members who are no longer able to contribute effectively to the group’s deliberations, who resign or who do not respect the conditions set out in the first or fifth indent of this paragraph or Article 287 of the Treaty establishing the European Community may be replaced for the remaining period of their mandate.
Člani, ki ne morejo več učinkovito prispevati k delu skupine, ki dajo odpoved ali ne spoštujejo pogojev iz prve ali pete alinee tega odstavka ali člena 287 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, so lahko za čas do izteka mandata zamenjani.
The Commission’s representative may ask experts or observers with specific competence on a subject on the agenda to participate in the group’s or sub-group’s deliberations if this is useful and/or necessary.
Predstavnik Komisije lahko prosi strokovnjake ali opazovalce s posebnim strokovnim znanjem o temi dnevnega reda, da sodelujejo v razpravah skupine ali podskupine, če je to koristno in/ali potrebno.
The group shall adopt its rules of procedure on the basis of the standard rules of procedure adopted by the Commission [4].
Skupina sprejme svoj poslovnik na podlagi standardnega poslovnika, ki ga je sprejela Komisija [4].
COM(2006) 35 final.
COM(2006) 35 konč.
on a Community position within the EU-Chile Association Council on the amendment of Annex I to the Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take into account the consolidation of the tariff preferences granted to Chile by the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP)
o stališču Skupnosti v Pridružitvenem svetu EU–Čile o spremembah Priloge I k Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Čile na drugi strani, zaradi upoštevanja konsolidacije tarifnih preferncialov, odobrenih Čilu v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (STP) Skupnosti
In order to ensure clarity, long term economic predictability and legal certainty for economic operators, it is considered appropriate to consolidate into the bilateral free trade agreement the remaining tariff preferences granted to Chile by the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences and not yet provided for by the Community tariff concessions listed in Annex I to the Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part [1], signed in Brussels on 18 November 2002.
Za zagotovitev jasnosti, dolgoročne gospodarske predvidljivosti in pravne varnosti gospodarskih subjektov se zdi primerno, da se v dvostranskem sporazumu o prosti trgovini konsolidirajo preostali tarifni preferenciali, ki so bili odobreni Čilu v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov Skupnosti, in ki še niso bili upoštevani na seznamu tarifnih koncesij Skupnosti, navedenih v Prilogi I k Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Čile na drugi strani [1], ki je bil podpisan v Bruslju 18. novembra 2002.
Chile, as a current beneficiary country under the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, will benefit by means of the enclosed Association Council Decision, from a commercial agreement giving preferential treatment including all the preferences provided for by the tariff scheme contained in Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences [2],
Čile, ki je trenutno v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov Skupnosti država upravičenka, bo imel s priloženim Sklepom Pridružitvenega sveta koristi od trgovinskega sporazuma, katerega preferencialna obravnava bo zajela vse preferenciale, določene v tarifni shemi iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) 980/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov [2] –
The position to be adopted by the Community within the Association Council on the amendment of Annex I to the Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take into account the consolidation of the tariff preferences granted to Chile by the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP), shall be based on the draft Decision of the Association Council annexed to this Decision.
Stališče Skupnosti v Pridružitvenem svetu o spremembah Priloge I k Sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Čile na drugi strani, zaradi upoštevanja konsolidacije tarifnih preferencialov, odobrenih Čilu v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (STS) Skupnosti, temelji na osnutku Sklepa Pridružitvenega sveta, ki je priložen k temu sklepu.
OJ L 169, 30.6.2005, p. 1.
UL L 169, 30.6. 2005, str. 1.
Draft Decision No …/2006 of the EU-Chile Association Council
Osnutek Sklepa št. …/2006 Pridružitvenega sveta EU–Čile
Having regard to the Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 18 November 2002 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Association Agreement’), and in particular Article 60(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni in Republiko Čile na drugi strani, ki je bil podpisan v Bruslju 18. novembra 2002 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Pridružitveni sporazum“), in zlasti člena 60(5),
In order to ensure clarity, long term economic predictability and legal certainty for economic operators, the parties have agreed to consolidate into their bilateral free trade agreement the remaining tariff preferences granted to Chile by the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP) and not yet provided for by the Community tariff concessions listed in Annex I to the Association Agreement.
Za zagotovitev jasnosti, dolgoročne gospodarske predvidljivosti in pravne varnosti gospodarskih subjektov so se pogodbenice strinjale, da se preostali tarifni preferenciali, ki so bili odobreni Čilu v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov Skupnosti in ki še niso bili upoštevani na seznamu tarifnih koncesij Skupnosti, navedenih v Prilogi I Pridružitvenega sporazuma EU in Čila, konsolidirajo tako, da se dodajo v dvostranski sporazum o prosti trgovini.
It is desirable to ensure smooth transition from the GSP to the preferential bilateral trade regime established by the Association Agreement by allowing GSP proofs of origin (certificate of origin Form A or invoice declaration) to be submitted for a certain period of time,
Zaželeno bi bilo, da se zagotovi nemoten prehod z STP na preferencialni dvostranski trgovinski režim, vzpostavljen s Pridružitvenim sporazumom, tako da se omogoči predložitev dokazil o poreklu blaga (potrdilo o poreklu, obrazec A ali izjava na računu) v določenem obdobju –
Proofs of origin properly issued in Chile in the framework of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP) shall be accepted in the European Community as valid proofs of origin under the preferential bilateral trade regime established by the Association Agreement, provided that:
Dokazila o poreklu, ki jih Čile pravilno izda v okviru sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov Skupnosti (STP), se v Evropski skupnosti sprejmejo kot veljavna dokazila o poreklu v okviru dvostranskega trgovinskega režima, vzpostavljenega s Pridružitvenim Sporazumom, pod pogojem, da:
Done at
V …,
(referred to in articles 60, 65, and 71 of the Association Agreement)
(iz členov 60, 65 in 71 Pridružitvenega sporazuma) Opombe: I. Carina, ki se uporablja za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Čila v Skupnost.
Applied customs duty on import into the Community of products originating in Chile. This duty results from the consolidation in the Association Agreement of the GSP duty applied to Chile.
Ta carina je posledica konsolidacije carine GSP, ki velja za Čile, v okviru Pridružitvenega sporazuma.
authorising the Kingdom of the Netherlands to apply a measure derogating from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
o dovoljenju Kraljevini Nizozemski, da uporablja ukrep, ki odstopa od člena 11 Šeste direktive 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [1], and in particular Article 27 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste Direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27 Direktive,
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 4 October 2004, the Kingdom of the Netherlands sought authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
V pismu, ki ga je Generalni sekretariat Komisije registriral 4. oktobra 2004, je Kraljevina Nizozemska zaprosila za dovoljenje za uvedbo posebnega ukrepa, ki bi odstopal od člena 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 1 December 2004 of the request made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
V skladu s členom 27(2) Direktive 77/388/EGS je Komisija s pismom z dne 1. decembra 2004 obvestila druge države članice o prošnji Kraljevine Nizozemske.
By letter dated 2 December 2004, the Commission notified the Kingdom of the Netherlands that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the request.
S pismom z dne 2. decembra 2004 je Komisija uradno obvestila Kraljevino Nizozemsko, da ima na voljo vse informacije, potrebne za oceno prošnje.
The aim of the derogation is to prevent the avoidance of value added tax (VAT) through the undervaluation of supplies between connected persons, where the recipient is not entitled to full or almost full deduction of VAT.
Cilj odstopanja je preprečiti izogibanje plačilu davka na dodano vrednost (DDV) s podcenitvijo pri dobavah med povezanimi osebami, kjer prejemnik ni upravičen do popolnega ali skoraj popolnega odbitka DDV.
It is designed to circumvent abuses in the supply of capital items or in the supply of services in relation to capital items, such as leasing or letting or any other arrangement whereby the goods are put at the disposal of the recipient.
Namenjeno je preprečevanju zlorab pri dobavah investicijskega blaga ali dobavi storitev, povezanih z investicijskim blagom, kot je zakup ali najem ali kakšen drug dogovor, ki prejemniku daje blago na razpolago.
Because of the relationship between the parties, the consideration is often fixed at a non-market value, resulting in significantly lower VAT revenues.
Zaradi povezave med strankami je dogovorjena vrednost pogosto nižja od tržne vrednosti, zaradi česar so nižji tudi prihodki od DDV.
The special measure should apply only in cases where the administration is able to conclude that the taxable amount, as determined in accordance with Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, has been influenced by the relationship between the parties.
Posebni ukrep bi bilo treba uporabljati le v primerih, ko uprava lahko sklepa, da je na davčno osnovo, ki se določi v skladu s členom 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS, vplivala povezava med strankami.
That conclusion should, in each case, be based on manifest facts, not presumptions.
Taka ugotovitev bi morala v vseh primerih temeljiti na izpričanih dejstvih in ne zgolj na domnevah.
It is therefore appropriate and proportionate to permit the Kingdom of the Netherlands to treat the open-market value of those supplies as the taxable amount.
Zato bi bilo primerno in ustrezno pooblastiti Kraljevino Nizozemsko, da kot davčno osnovo obravnava tržno vrednost teh dobav.
The derogations pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC which counter avoidance of VAT linked to the taxable amount of supplies between related parties are included in a proposal for a Directive rationalising some of the derogations pursuant to that Article.
Odstopanja na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 77/388/EGS, ki preprečujejo izogibanje DDV v povezavi z davčno osnovo dobav med povezanimi strankami, so vključena v predlog direktive o racionalizaciji nekaterih odstopanj iz navedenega člena.
It is therefore necessary to cause the application period of this derogation to end when that Directive enters into force.
Zato bi bilo treba omejiti obdobje uporabe tega odstopanja z začetkom veljavnosti navedene direktive.
The derogation has no adverse impact on the Communities' own resources accruing from VAT,
Odstopanje nima negativnih vplivov na lastna sredstva Skupnosti od DDV –
By way of derogation from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Kingdom of the Netherlands is hereby authorised to take the open-market value, as defined in Article 11(A)(1)(d) of Directive 77/388/EEC, as the taxable amount for the supply of capital items or any other supply of services whereby the capital item is put at the disposal of the recipient, where the following conditions are met:
Z odstopanjem od člena 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS se Kraljevini Nizozemski dovoli uporaba tržne vrednosti, kot je opredeljena v členu 11(A)(1)(d) Direktive 77/388/EGS, kot davčne osnove za dobavo investicijskega blaga ali katere koli druge dobave storitev, pri čemer je glavni predmet dan na razpolago prejemniku, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the recipient does not have the right to full or almost full deduction of VAT;
prejemnik nima pravice popolnega ali skoraj popolnega odbitka;
the supplier and the recipient are directly or indirectly connected persons according to national legislation;
dobavitelj in prejemnik sta v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo neposredno ali posredno povezani osebi;
facts make it possible to conclude from the circumstances of the case that the relationship between those connected persons has influenced the taxable amount, as determined in accordance with Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
na podlagi okoliščin primera je mogoče sklepati, da je povezava med temi povezanimi osebami vplivala na davčno osnovo, ki je bila določena v skladu s členom 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS.
For the purposes of this Article, capital item shall mean capital goods as defined by the Kingdom of the Netherlands in accordance with Article 20(4) of Directive 77/388/EEC and, as far as they are not covered by this definition, services of substantial value which can be amortised.
Za namene tega člena se za investicijsko blago šteje blago, kot ga je v skladu s členom 20(4) Direktive 77/388/EGS opredelila Kraljevina Nizozemska, in, kolikor niso zajete v tej opredelitvi, storitve velike vrednosti, ki jih je možno amortizirati.
The authorisation granted under Article 1 shall expire on the date of entry into force of a Directive rationalising the derogations pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC which counter avoidance of VAT linked to the taxable amount, or on 31 December 2009, whichever is the earlier.
Dovoljenje na podlagi člena 1 preneha veljati na dan začetka veljavnosti Direktive o racionalizaciji odstopanj na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 77/388/EGS, ki preprečujejo izogibanje plačilu DDV v povezavi z davčno osnovo, ali 31. decembra 2009, pri čemer se upošteva zgodnejši datum.
of 28 February 2006
z dne 28. februarja 2006
amending Decision 2006/7/EC as regards an extension of the list of countries and the period of application thereof
o spremembi Odločbe 2006/7/ES glede razširitve seznama držav in podaljšanja obdobja uporabe Odločbe
(notified under document number C(2006) 619)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 619)
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [1], and in particular Article 22(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [1], in zlasti člena 22(6) Direktive,
Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and other birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming.
Aviarna influenca je kužna virusna bolezen pri perutnini in ostalih pticah, ki povzroča smrt in motnje, ki lahko hitro dobijo epizootske razsežnosti ter lahko predstavljajo resno nevarnost za zdravje živali in ljudi ter močno zmanjšajo donosnost reje perutnine.
There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products, including untreated feathers.
Obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni lahko prenese z mednarodno trgovino z živo perutnino in perutninskimi proizvodi, vključno z neobdelanim perjem.
Following the outbreak of a very serious epidemic of avian influenza, caused by a highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus strain, in in many countries in south-eastern Asia starting in December 2003, the Commission adopted several protection measures in relation to avian influenza, taking into account that this disease also poses a significant risk to public health.
Po izbruhu zelo resne epidemije aviarne influence, ki jo je decembra 2003 v mnogih državah v jugovzhodni Aziji povzročil visoko patogeni sev virusa aviarne influence H5N1, je Komisija sprejela več zaščitnih ukrepov v zvezi z aviarno influenco, ob upoštevanju, da lahko ta bolezen predstavlja resno tveganje za javno zdravje.
In accordance with Commission Decision 2006/7/EC of 9 January 2006 concerning certain protection measures in relation to the import of feathers from certain third countries [2], imports of untreated feathers and parts thereof have been suspended from several third countries.
V skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2006/7/ES z dne 9. januarja 2006 o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z uvozom perja iz nekaterih tretjih držav [2], je uvoz neobdelanega perja in delov neobdelanih peres iz večih tretjih držav začasno ustavljen.
Those third countries are listed in the Annex to Decision 2006/7/EC.
Navedene tretje države so naštete v Prilogi k Odločbi 2006/7/ES.
That Decision is to apply until 30 April 2006.
Navedena odločba se uporablja do 30. aprila 2006.
The number of the third countries with outbreaks or suspected outbreaks of avian influenza have increased recently.
Število tretjih držav, kjer je izbruhnila aviarna influenca ali kjer obstaja sum izbruhov aviarne influence, je v zadnjem času naraslo.
It appears that the disease has spread to those countries by migratory birds.
Zdi se, da se je bolezen razširila v navedene države prek ptic selivk.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in its Scientific Opinion on Animal health and welfare aspects of avian influenza adopted on 13 to 14 September 2005 concluded that in order to reduce the possible risk of spreading both low pathogenic and highly pathogenic avian influenza by feathers, they should be properly treated before being traded.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA) je v svojem Znanstvenem mnenju o zdravju in dobrem počutju živali z vidikov aviarne influence, sprejetem 13. in 14. septembra 2005, sklenila, da je treba zaradi zmanjšanja možne nevarnosti širitve tako nizko patogenega kot visoko patogenega virusa aviarne influence preko perja, perje primerno obdelati, preden se z njim trguje.
This opinion was issued before that the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus had shown the tendency to spread on a global scale.
To mnenje je bilo dano preden je visoko patogeni virus aviarne influence H5N1 pokazal nagnjenost k širitvi na svetovni ravni.