natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission however believes that this should not be a reason to deviate in the allocation method, since even if the global activity of the plants is decreased, the overall profile of their revenue generation (that is, with most of the revenues generated in the beginning) should remain the same.
Komisija kljub temu meni, da to ne bi smel biti razlog za odstopanje pri metodi razporeditve, saj bi moral celotni okvir njihovega ustvarjanja prihodka (to pomeni, da je večina prihodka ustvarjenega na začetku) kljub zmanjševanju skupne dejavnosti elektrarn ostati enak.
Accordingly, the Commission has allocated all nuclear liabilities of the THORP and SMP plants to BNFL.
Zato je Komisija vse jedrske obveznosti obratov THORP in SMP dodelila družbi BNFL.
The second step in the computation consists in calculating the value of BNFL's contribution to these liabilities.
Druga faza izračuna je sestavljena iz izračuna vrednosti prispevka družbe BNFL k tem obveznostim.
This contribution must first take account of liabilities that have already been discharged by BNFL.
Ta prispevek mora najprej upoštevati obveznosti, ki jih je družba BNFL že poravnala.
Indeed, a certain number of sites, including in particular some Magnox plants, have already ceased operation, and decommissioning has started.
Določeno število lokacij, posebej nekatere elektrarne Magnox, so že prenehale obratovati in začela se je razgradnja.
BNFL has spent GBP 5,1 billion for meeting these liabilities.
Družba BNFL je porabila 5,1 milijarde GBP za izpolnitev teh obveznosti.
While doing so, BNFL did not check whether the liabilities it was discharging were ‘attributable’ to it under the present reference system.
Pri tem pa družba BNFL ni preverila, ali so ji bile obveznosti, ki jih je izpolnjevala, sploh „pripisane“ v skladu s trenutnim referenčnim sistemom.
However, the whole of this contribution can be included in the computation since either discharged liabilities were attributable to BNFL and therefore can be directly included in the computation, or they were not attributable to it and in this case BNFL provided contribution for more liabilities than it should have, and would have deserved compensation for it.
Vendar je ta celotni prispevek lahko vključen v izračun, saj so bile obveznosti izpolnjene ali pripisane družbi BNFL, zaradi česar so lahko neposredno vključene v izračun, ali pa niso bile pripisane družbi in je v tem primeru družba BNFL zagotovila več obveznosti, kot je bilo potrebno, in bi si zaslužila nadomestilo zanje.
Second, the contribution must also take account of the financial assets that BNFL will provide to the NDA.
Prispevek mora prav tako upoštevati finančna sredstva, ki jih bo družba BNFL zagotovila NDA.
From the value of these assets that will be transferred to the NDA must be subtracted the value that was received by BNFL at the time it purchased the Magnox plants, since only the increase in value of the assets constitutes a contribution from BNFL.
Od vrednosti sredstev, ki bodo prenesena na NDA, je treba odšteti vrednost, ki jo je družba BNFL prejela ob nakupu elektrarn Magnox, saj le povišanje vrednosti sredstev pomeni prispevek družbe BNFL.
Finally, future cash flow for SMP and THORP, which will be received by the NDA instead of BNFL, should also be counted as BNFL's contribution, in order to be consistent with the aforementioned decision to attribute all the liabilities of these plants to BNFL.
Prihodnji finančni tokovi obratov SMP in THORP, ki jih bo namesto družbe BNFL prejel NDA, bi se morali prav tako upoštevati kot prispevek družbe BNFL, da bi bili skladni s prej navedeno odločitvijo, da se vse obveznosti teh obratov dodelijo družbi BNFL.
The chart below summarises the results of the computation under this reference system:
Spodnja tabela povzema rezultate izračuna v skladu s tem referenčnim sistemom:
Estimate of contribution from BNFL to its allocated share of liabilities.
Ocena prispevka družbe BNFL k deležu obveznosti, ki ji je dodeljen.
2005 prices, discounted at 5,4 % nominal, amounts in billion GBP.
Cene za leto 2005, znižane za 5,4 % v nominalni vrednosti, zneski v milijardah GBP.
Non-Thorp and Non-SMP liabilities allocated to BNFL
Druge obveznosti, ki niso obveznosti obratov Thorp in SMP, dodeljene družbi BNFL
Thorp and SMP liabilities allocated to BNFL
Obveznosti obratov Thorp in SMP, dodeljene družbi BNFL
Total Liabilities to be funded by BNFL
Celotne obveznosti, ki jih financira družba BNFL
Funds to be provided to NDA
Sredstva, ki se zagotovijo NDA
THORP and SMP Future Cash flows
Prihodnji finančni tokovi obratov THORP in SMP
Total value of funds
Skupna vrednost sredstev
Funds provided to BNFL under Magnox transaction
Sredstva, zagotovljena družbi BNFL v okviru transakcije elektrarn Magnox
Other funds
Ostala sredstva
Subtract total funds provided to BNFL
Odšteta skupna sredstva, zagotovljena družbi BNFL
Value of net funds
Vrednost neto sredstev
Liabilities discharged by BNFL
Obveznosti, ki jih je družba BNFL poravnala
Funds Provided towards liabilities
Sredstva za pokritje obveznosti
Result of BNFL administration
Rezultat uprave družbe BNFL
The table above was submitted by the United Kingdom authorities.
Zgornjo tabelo so predložili organi Združenega kraljestva.
It is based on figures from BNFL's accounts, as in Table 3.
Temelji na številkah iz računovodskih izkazov družbe BNFL, kot je navedeno v Tabeli 3.
The considerations developed in recitals (128) to (133) apply in this case too.
Premisleki, navedeni v uvodnih izjavah (128) do (133), veljajo tudi v tem primeru.
Aid within the meaning of Article 87 (1) of the EC Treaty — Presence of aid to the NDA
Pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES – Prisotnost pomoči za NDA.
The two computations described above could also be applied to determine whether and to what extent the Measure gives an advantage to the NDA.
Zgoraj opisana izračuna se lahko uporabita tudi za odločitev o tem, ali in do kakšne mere ukrep pomeni prednost za NDA.
However, the Commission considers that, in this case, the computation is not necessary.
Vendar pa Komisija meni, da v tem primeru izračun ni potreben.
Indeed, the Measure provides an unlimited guarantee that the State will cover all the NDA's expenses if these expenses cannot be covered by the authority's revenues from commercial activities or by financial assets transferred to it.
Ukrep vsekakor zagotavlja neomejeno jamstvo, da bo država krila vse stroške organa NDA, če se ti stroški ne morejo kriti s prihodki organa iz poslovne dejavnosti ali s finančnimi sredstvi, prenesenimi nanj.
Nor is this guarantee is neither limited in scope nor in time.
Prav tako to jamstvo ni omejeno niti glede obsega niti časa.
It does not exclude costs linked to competitive activities, in particular where these activities may generate added incremental liabilities, and is not limited in amount.
Ne izključuje stroškov, povezanih s konkurenčnimi dejavnostmi, še zlasti, kadar lahko te dejavnosti ustvarijo dodatne posamične obveznosti in kadar niso omejene glede zneska.
The Commission considers that this unlimited guarantee is in itself an advantage that is granted by the State to the NDA.
Komisija meni, da je to neomejeno jamstvo samo po sebi prednost, ki jo je država dodelila NDA.
Since this guarantee is financed by the resources of the State and is specifically aimed at the NDA, and since the NDA will continue to have some commercial activities in markets where there is trade between Member States, the Commission concludes that the Measure involves State aid to the NDA within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ker se to jamstvo financira iz državnih sredstev in je posebej namenjeno NDA ter glede na to, da bo NDA nadaljeval z nekaterimi gospodarskimi dejavnostmi na trgih, na katerih poteka trgovina med državami članicami, Komisija ugotavlja, da ukrep vključuje državno pomoč za NDA v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission notes that the United Kingdom did not challenge the fact that the measure constitutes State aid to the NDA.
Komisija ugotavlja, da Združeno kraljestvo ni oporekalo dejstvu, da ukrep pomeni državno pomoč za NDA.
Compatibility assessment of the aid to the NDA under the EC Treaty
Ocena združljivosti pomoči za NDA v skladu s Pogodbo ES
Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty provides for the general principle of prohibition of State aid within the Community.
Člen 87(1) Pogodbe ES določa splošno načelo prepovedi državne pomoči v Skupnosti.
Article 87(2) and 87(3) of the EC Treaty provide for exemptions to the general incompatibility set out in Article 87(1).
Člena 87(2) in 87(3) Pogodbe ES določata izjeme v zvezi s splošno nezdružljivostjo iz člena 87(1).
The exemptions in Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty do not apply in this case because the Measure does not have a social character and is not granted to individual consumers, it does not make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences and is not granted to the economy of certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany affected by its division.
Izjeme v členu 87(2) Pogodbe ES v tem primeru ne veljajo, ker ukrep nima socialnega značaja in ni dodeljen posameznim uporabnikom, ne nadomesti škode, ki jo povzročijo naravne nesreče ali izjemne razmere in ni dodeljen gospodarstvu nekaterih področij Zvezne republike Nemčije, na katere je vplivala delitev države.
Further exemptions are set out in Article 87(3) of the EC Treaty.
Nadaljnje izjeme so opredeljene v členu 87(3) Pogodbe ES.
Exemptions in Articles 87(3)(a), 87(3)(b) and 87(3)(d) do not apply in this case because the aid does not promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment, it does not promote the execution of an important project of common European interest or remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State, and it does not promote culture and heritage conservation.
Izjeme v členih 87(3)(a), 87(3)(b) in 87(3)(d) v tem primeru ne veljajo, ker pomoč ne spodbuja gospodarskega razvoja na območjih, kjer je življenjska raven izjemno nizka ali kjer je podzaposlenost velika, ne spodbuja izvedbe pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa ali ne odpravlja resne motnje v gospodarstvu države članice ter ne pospešuje kulture in ohranjanja kulturne dediščine.
Only the exemption in Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty may therefore apply.
Zato lahko velja le izjema, navedena v členu 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
Article 87(3)(c) provides for the authorisation of State aid granted to promote the development of certain economic sectors, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent contrary to the common interest.
Člen 87(3)(c) določa odobritev državne pomoči za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The Commission practice is to interpret the text of Article 87(3)(c) as meaning that a measure can be found compatible with the Treaty where its positive contribution to the fulfilment of certain Community objectives outweighs its negative impact on competition on the internal market.
Praksa Komisije je, da razlaga besedilo člena 87(3)(c) v smislu, da je ukrep lahko združljiv s Pogodbo, kadar njegov pozitivni prispevek k izpolnitvi nekaterih ciljev Skupnosti prevlada nad njegovim negativnim vplivom na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
Section 7.1 explains in some detail the compatibility of the Measure with the objectives of the Euratom Treaty.
Oddelek 7.1 podrobneje pojasnjuje združljivost ukrepa s cilji Pogodbe Euratom.
The Commission welcomes the establishment of the NDA and views it as an excellent measure for handling in an efficient way the burden of nuclear liabilities arising from the distant past when environment policies had not yet reached present-day standards.
Komisija pozdravlja ustanovitev NDA in ga vidi kot izvrsten ukrep za učinkovito upravljanje jedrskih obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz daljne preteklosti, ko okoljska politika še ni dosegala današnjih standardov.
The Commission considers that the NDA will contribute in a decisive way to the best possible implementation of the back end of the nuclear cycle.
Komisija meni, da bo NDA odločilno prispeval k najboljši možni izvedbi postradiacijskega dela jedrskega cikla.
In this way, it will clearly contribute to the fulfilment of the Community's nuclear policy as set out in the Euratom Treaty.
Na ta način bo nedvomno prispeval k izpolnjevanju jedrske politike Skupnosti, kot je opredeljena v Pogodbi Euratom.
The positive contribution of the Measure is therefore very important, and well established in the Commission's view.
Pozitiven prispevek ukrepa je torej zelo pomemben in po mnenju Komisije dobro uveljavljen.
Had the NDA been under an obligation to cease as soon as possible the commercial operation of the assets for which it will be responsible, there would probably have been no significant negative impact of the Measure on competition.
Če bi moral NDA v najkrajšem možnem času prenehati z gospodarskim upravljanjem sredstev, za katera bo odgovarjal, verjetno ne bi bilo nobenega večjega negativnega vpliva ukrepa na konkurenco.
However, the United Kingdom did not make this choice, and allowed the NDA to continue the commercial operation of assets under certain conditions.
Vendar Združeno kraljestvo ni sprejelo te odločitve in je dovolilo organu NDA, da nadaljuje z gospodarskim upravljanjem sredstev pod določenimi pogoji.
The Commission can only note that, by doing so, the United Kingdom has made it possible for the NDA's operations to have an impact on the internal market.
Komisija lahko ugotovi le, da je Združeno kraljestvo s tem omogočilo, da dejavnosti organa NDA vplivajo na notranji trg.
This makes it necessary to analyse the magnitude of this impact in order to assess the Measure.
Zato je treba analizirati obseg tega vpliva, da bi ocenili ukrep.
The Commission considers that the continuation of the commercial operation of the assets by the NDA, with the underlying aid from the State, has a very similar impact on competition to that which would result from the continuation of operations of a company in receipt of restructuring aid.
Komisija meni, da ima nadaljevanje gospodarskega upravljanja sredstev s strani NDA na podlagi državne pomoči zelo podoben vpliv na konkurenco kot nadaljevanje dejavnosti podjetja ob prejemanju pomoči za prestrukturiranje.
The parallelism with the BE restructuring case is striking in this respect.
Podobnost s primerom prestrukturiranja družbe BE je v tem pogledu presenetljiva.
In view of these similarities, the Commission considers that the most appropriate way to assess the impact of the Measure on competition and to establish the limits within which it may be found compatible with the common market consists in using the underlying reasoning of the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing or restructuring firms in difficulty, and in particular the need to find proportionate compensatory measures to mitigate the effects of the aid where necessary.
Glede na te podobnosti Komisija meni, da je najbolj primeren način za ocenitev vpliva ukrepa na konkurenco in določitev omejitev, znotraj katerih je ukrep lahko združljiv s skupnim trgom, uporaba osnovne utemeljitve Smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah in zlasti potreba, da se najdejo sorazmerni izravnalni ukrepi za ublažitev učinkov pomoči, kadar je to potrebno.
Before entering into a detailed analysis of the competition situation for each of the assets, the Commission has two general remarks concerning the impact of the Measure on competition.
Pred začetkom podrobne analize konkurenčnega položaja za vsako od sredstev ima Komisija dve splošni pripombi, ki se nanašata na vpliv ukrepa na konkurenco.
The first remark is that the statutes of the NDA themselves mitigate the impact of the Measure on competition even for assets that will continue in operation.
Prva pripomba je, da sam statut organa NDA blaži vpliv ukrepa na konkurenco celo za sredstva, s katerimi se bo še naprej poslovalo.
A company with a commercial goal would be likely to use operating aid to reduce its costs and sell at low price.
Družba z gospodarskim ciljem bi verjetno uporabila pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, da bi zmanjšala svoje stroške in prodajala po nizkih cenah.
In contrast, the NDA will operate assets only if the operation can add value for its main duty, the decommissioning of the plants.
Nasprotno pa bo NDA upravljal s sredstvi le, če upravljanje lahko doda vrednost njegovi glavni dolžnosti, in sicer razgradnji elektrarn.
The NDA will therefore have no incentive to use aid to provide services below the market price, and certainly no interest in using the aid to decrease its costs.
Organ NDA torej ne bo imel spodbude za uporabo pomoči, da bi tako zagotavljal storitve pod tržno ceno, in nedvomno nobenega interesa za uporabo pomoči za znižanje svojih stroškov.
Furthermore, whilst the NDA will continue to operate the existing assets, it will not invest in any new ones.
Čeprav bo NDA nadaljeval z upravljanjem obstoječih sredstev, ne bo vlagal v nova.
It will therefore not be in its interests to have a commercial policy aimed at gaining influence and market share.
Zato torej ne bo v njegovem interesu, da bi vodil komercialno politiko s ciljem pridobivanja vpliva in tržnega deleža.
The NDA will neither invest in new assets nor engage in new activities.
Organ NDA ne bo vlagal v nova sredstva, niti izvajal novih dejavnosti.
The cash flow it will generate by continuing the operation of certain assets will be used solely for the purpose of providing more funding for the discharge of nuclear liabilities.
Finančni tok, ki ga bo ustvaril z nadaljnjim upravljanjem nekaterih sredstev, se bo uporabil izključno za zagotavljanje dodatnega financiranja za izpolnitev jedrskih obveznosti.
The operating framework for the NDA strictly ringfences all NDA's revenues, preventing them to be used for other purposes.
Poslovni okvir NDA strogo jamči za vse prihodke organa in tako preprečuje, da bi se uporabili v druge namene.
All nuclear plants operators should cover in principle their proper share of nuclear liabilities under the polluter pays principle.
Vsi upravljavci jedrskih elektrarn bi morali načeloma kriti svoj ustrezni delež jedrskih obveznosti v skladu z načelom „onesnaževalec plača“.
For this purpose, the UK undertook to require the NDA and Site Licensee Companies for the power plants to undertake to use all reasonable efforts in their prices to recover the share of the liabilities that are attributable to the NDA.
V ta namen se je Združeno kraljestvo zavezalo, da bo od NDA in podjetij z licenco za upravljanje lokacij zahtevalo, da si prizadevajo, kolikor je razumno mogoče, da v svojih cenah pokrijejo delež obveznosti, ki so dodeljena NDA.
In the circumstances where this goal would not be reached, the UK will report to the Commission and inform it on the reasons why it could not be reached.
V okoliščinah, ko ta cilj ne bo dosežen, bo Združeno kraljestvo poročalo Komisiji in jo obvestilo o razlogih, zakaj ni mogel biti dosežen.
The second remark is that the competitive system that the United Kingdom will put in place to designate SLCs will in itself have a very beneficial effect on competition in the internal market.
Druga pripomba je, da bo imel konkurenčni sistem, ki ga bo Združeno kraljestvo vzpostavilo za imenovanje podjetij z licenco za upravljanje lokacij, sam po sebi zelo ugoden vpliv na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
It will create the basis for a real market in the operation of some nuclear sites in the United Kingdom and, more importantly, their decommissioning.
Ustvaril bo podlago za dejanski trg upravljanja nekaterih jedrskih lokacij v Združenem kraljestvu in, kar je še pomembneje, za njihovo razgradnjo.
The Commission considers that the development of this market is an excellent opportunity for the Community economy as a whole.
Komisija meni, da je razvoj tega trga izvrstna priložnost za celotno gospodarstvo Skupnosti.
The Commission has also analysed the competition situation of each of the types of assets that the NDA will continue to operate commercially.
Komisija je proučila tudi konkurenčni položaj vsakega od vrst sredstev, s katerimi bo organ NDA še naprej komercialno posloval.
Magnox power plants
Elektrarne Magnox
The Magnox power plants are operating on the very competitive Great Britain electricity market.
Elektrarne Magnox poslujejo na zelo konkurenčnem trgu z električno energijo v Veliki Britaniji.
The Commission notes the United Kingdom's microeconomic arguments that the Measure, even if it decreased the plants' SRMCs, would not impact the time during which competitors run their plants and the price at which they sell their electricity.
Komisija upošteva mikroekonomske argumente Združenega kraljestva, da ukrep, tudi če bi znižal kratkoročne mejne stroške elektrarne, ne bi vplival na čas, ko konkurenti vodijo svoje elektrarne, ali na ceno, po kateri prodajajo svojo električno energijo.
The Commission has reservations in this respect.
Komisija ima v tem pogledu zadržke.
Indeed, these arguments may be valid in a single, mostly short term, perfect market, with perfect information, preferably pool based.
Seveda lahko ti argumenti veljajo na posameznem, predvsem kratkoročno popolnem trgu, s popolnimi informacijami, ki so po možnosti združene.
However, the present electricity market in Great Britain is not such a market.
Vendar pa trenutni trg z električno energijo v Veliki Britaniji ni takšen.
It is mostly based on bilateral contracts, with several futures markets.
Večinoma temelji na dvostranskih pogodbah z več terminskimi trgi.
Furthermore, the market is fundamentally divided between wholesale and direct supply to business, the second segment being apparently more commercially valuable.
Poleg tega je trg predvsem razdeljen med veleprodajo in neposredno dobavo gospodarstvu, pri čemer je drugi segment očitno komercialno več vreden.
Without affecting the actual amount of electricity sold by one of the NDA's competitors, the Measure may force it to switch partly to a less attractive part of the market, which would impact its results.
Ne da bi ukrep vplival na dejansko količino električne energije, ki jo proda eden od konkurentov organa NDA, ga lahko ta ukrep prisili, da se delno preusmeri na manj privlačen del trga, kar bi vplivalo na njegove rezultate.
The Commission therefore considers that the Measure distorts or threatens to distort competition on this market which must be mitigated.
Komisija zato meni, da ukrep izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljal konkurenco na tem trgu, kar je treba ublažiti.
The ideal way to mitigate the negative impact of the aid on the market would be to cease the operations of the power plants.
Najboljši način za ublažitev negativnega vpliva pomoči na trg bi bilo prenehanje delovanja elektrarn.
The Commission appreciates however that closing down these power plants immediately might have a negative impact on the efficiency and safety of the decommissioning operations.
Vendar pa Komisija ocenjuje, da bi lahko imelo takojšnje zaprtje teh elektrarn negativen vpliv na učinkovitost in varnost dejavnosti razgradnje.
Indeed, because the Sellafield site would not be in a position to start waste reprocessing for several power plants at such short notice, temporary storage solutions would have to be provided.
Ker lokacija Sellafield seveda v tako kratkem roku ne bi bila sposobna začeti predelave odpadkov za več elektrarn, bi bilo treba najti začasne rešitve skladiščenja.
This would complicate decommissioning works, adding costs and potentially safety concerns.
To bi otežilo razgradnjo ter povečalo stroške in morebitne skrbi glede varnosti.
It might also cause problems for security of electricity supply in the already tense Great Britain market.
Poleg tega bi lahko povzročilo težave glede varnosti dobave električne energije na že tako napetem trgu Velike Britanije.
The Commission considers that requiring the immediate closure of the plants is therefore not a proportionate measure for mitigating competition concerns.
Komisija meni, da zahtevanje takojšnjega zaprtja elektrarn torej ni sorazmeren ukrep za ublažitev zaskrbljenosti glede konkurence.