natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The use of natural gas as motor fuel had triggered a major conversion effort by the main car manufacturers in Europe (Fiat, Opel, Volvo, Renault, VW, Ford and Mercedes) and was deeply affecting the commercial vehicle sector too.
Uporaba zemeljskega plina kot pogonskega goriva je spodbudila večja prizadevanja za preusmeritev na plin pri glavnih proizvajalcih avtomobilov v Evropi (Fiat, Opel, Volvo, Renault, VW, Ford in Mercedes) in je močno vplivala tudi na sektor gospodarskih vozil.
Yet the market for natural gas was not mature and needed further investments.
Vendar trg zemeljskega plina ni razvit in zahteva dodatna vlaganja.
The first step in that direction was the development of an appropriate service station infrastructure which, given the limited number of natural gas-driven vehicles on the roads in Europe, was as yet not profitable.
Prvi korak v tej smeri je razvoj ustrezne infrastrukture bencinskih servisov, ki zaradi omejenega števila vozil, ki jih poganja zemeljski plin, še ne prinašajo dobička.
The proposal for a Directive presented by the Commission on 7 November 2001 set a target share of the motor fuel market for natural gas of 10 % by 2020 [18].
Predlog direktive, ki ga je Komisija predstavila 7. novembra 2001, postavlja cilj, da bi zemeljski plin na trgu pogonskega goriva do leta 2020 zavzel delež 10 % [18].
Support for the establishment of the natural gas infrastructure was therefore necessary and justified.
Podpora za vzpostavitev infrastrukture za zemeljski plin je tako nujna in upravičena.
OMV Erdgas also pointed to the substantial difference between the scheme proposed by Piedmont and the Dutch scheme: in the latter case, Dutch service stations located along the border with Germany were granted aid in order to compensate for excise differentials in the border region and allow Dutch outlets to compete on an equal footing with German stations across the border.
OMV Erdgas je tudi opozoril na bistveno razliko med programom, ki ga je predlagal Piemont, in nizozemskim programom: v slednjem primeru so dobili nizozemski bencinski servisi ob meji z Nemčijo pomoč, da bi nadomestili razlike v trošarinah v obmejnem območju in omogočili nizozemskim prodajnim mestom enakopravno konkuriranje nemškim servisom ob meji.
This was not the case in Piedmont.
To pa ne velja za Piemont.
In its observations, the Federal Government of Germany also stressed the substantial difference between the Dutch and Italian cases.
Tudi zvezna vlada Nemčije je v svojih ugotovitvah poudarila bistveno razliko med nizozemskim in italijanskim primerom.
First, the de minimis rule was clearly not applicable to the measure adopted by the Region of Piedmont and any discussion on that basis would be pointless.
Prvič, pravilo de mininis se očitno ne uporablja za ukrep, ki ga je sprejela regija Piemont, in vsaka razprava na tej podlagi je nesmiselna.
Second, the German Government took the view that the measure fell to be assessed under the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection, because of its stated objective (as distinct from its effect).
Drugič, nemška vlada je zavzela stališče, da bi se ukrep moral presojati v skladu s smernicami Skupnosti za državno pomoč za varovanje okolja zaradi njegovega navedenega cilja (čeprav različnega od njegovega učinka).
The other arguments put forward by the German Government did not differ from those of OMV Erdgas [19].
Druge utemeljitve, ki jih je predložila nemška vlada, se niso razlikovale od utemeljitev OMV Erdgasa [19].
BGW (Bundesverband der deutschen Gas- und Wasserwirtschaft e. V.), the Federal Association of the German Gas and Water Industry, welcomed the initiative of the Region of Piedmont and described similar developments and actions pursued in Germany to develop the market for natural gas in road transport.
BGW (Bundesverband der deutschen Gas- und Wasserwirtschaft), Zvezno združenje nemške industrije plina in vode, je pozdravil pobudo regije Piemont in opisal podobno dogajanje in ukrepe za razvoj trga za zemeljski plin v cestnem prometu, ki se uveljavljajo v Nemčiji.
The central argument was that natural gas service stations in Italy were not in any way in competition with German stations, and there was no distortion or threat of distortion of competition affecting trade between Member States within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Osrednja trditev je bila, da bencinski servisi za zemeljski plin v Italiji nikakor ne konkurirajo nemškim servisom in da ni izkrivljanja konkurence ali grožnje za izkrivljanje konkurence, kar bi vplivalo na trgovino med državami članicami v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
On the contrary, the anticipated growth in the number of natural gas-driven vehicles in Piedmont could be expected — through cross-border traffic flows — to result in increased sales of natural gas in German service stations too, a positive development in itself.
Nasprotno, zaradi pričakovanega povečanja števila vozil, ki jih poganja zemeljski plin, v Piemontu – zaradi čezmejnega pretoka prometa – lahko pričakujejo povečano prodajo zemeljskega plina tudi nemški bencinski servisi, kar je že samo po sebi pozitivno.
It should be observed that the same argument was used by the regional authorities of Piedmont in relation to France.
Treba je pripomniti, da so enako utemeljitev uporabili regionalni organi Piemonta v zvezi s Francijo.
The Italian authorities have fulfilled their obligation under Article 88(3) of the Treaty by notifying the scheme to the Commission before putting it into effect.
Italijanski organi so izpolnili svojo obveznost po členu 88(3) Pogodbe, saj so pred izvedbo programa o njem obvestili Komisijo.
Presence of aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty
Obstoj pomoči v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES
Article 87(1) of the Treaty states that ‘any aid granted by a Member State or through state resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, insofar as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the common market’.
Člen 87(1) Pogodbe navaja, da „je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami“.
The scheme provides an advantage through state resources (grants of EUR 150000 from the budget of the Piedmont Region) to certain undertakings (the licensees, owners of the service stations).
Program prinaša ugodnosti nekaterim pravnim ali fizičnim osebam (imetniki dovoljenja, lastniki bencinskih servisov) v obliki državnih sredstev (dodelitev 150000 EUR iz proračuna regije Piemont).
The measure is therefore selective in scope.
Ukrep je potemtakem selektiven.
Nevertheless, based on the evidence provided by the Italian authorities after the Commission decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure, the effect on trade between Member States within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty has been demonstrated to be nil.
Vendar so dokazi, ki so jih italijanski organi predložili po odločitvi Komisije, da bo sprožila formalni postopek preiskave, pokazali, da ni učinka na trgovino med državami članicami v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
Trade could, however, be affected by the measure if there was competition between the Italian outlets receiving the grant from the Piedmont Region and methane outlets in another Member State.
Ukrep pa bi lahko učinkoval na trgovino, če bi med italijanskimi prodajnimi mesti, ki dobijo nepovratna sredstva od regije Piemont, in prodajnimi mesti za metan v drugi državi članici vladala konkurenca.
In this context, it should be stressed that the only Member State with which Piedmont has a common border is France.
V tem smislu je treba poudariti, da Piemont meji le na Francijo.
Most of this border is mountainous and can therefore be crossed by vehicle only through passes or toll tunnels.
Ta meja pa večinoma poteka po goratem območju in jo je z vozilom mogoče prečkati samo čez prelaze ali predore, za katere je treba plačati cestnino.
In addition, the outlets have to be connected to the existing pipelines within the regional borders: as mentioned above, the path of the two pipelines closest to the border between Piedmont and France cross the Alps at Bardonecchia and Cesana Torinese, which are accessible from France by the Fréjus toll tunnel and the Montgenèvre pass respectively.
Poleg tega morajo biti prodajna mesta priključena na obstoječe cevovode znotraj mej regije: kakor je navedeno zgoraj, cevovoda, ki potekata najbliže meji med Piemontom in Francijo, prečkata Alpe pri Bardonecchii in Cesani Torinese, v prvo je iz Francije mogoče priti skozi predor Fréjus, za katerega je treba plačati cestnino, in v drugo prek prelaza Montgenèvre.
Contrary to the case covered by Decision 1999/705/EC, it is therefore inconceivable that a driver would cross the border in order to buy cheaper methane, especially since the range of a methane-fuelled engine is smaller than a petrol engine (300 km versus at least 600 km) and refuelling with methane is possible only during service station opening hours.
V nasprotju s primerom, zajetim v Odločbi 1999/705/ES, je torej malo verjetno, da bi voznik prečkal mejo zaradi nabave cenejšega metana, zlasti ker motor, ki ga poganja metan, z enim polnjenjem prevozi manjšo razdaljo kot bencinski motor (300 km proti najmanj 600 km) in ker je mogoče polniti metan samo med delovnim časom bencinskega servisa.
Trade could also be affected by the measure if the same undertaking could receive several grants through the building of several methane distribution outlets.
Ukrep bi učinkoval na trgovino tudi, če bi ista pravna oziroma fizična oseba lahko dobila nepovratna sredstva večkrat, ker bi postavila več distribucijskih prodajnih mest.
In this connection, it should be mentioned that only 33 new outlets are expected to be built given the budget constraints.
V tej zvezi je treba omeniti, da se bo zaradi proračunskih omejitev po pričakovanju zgradilo samo 33 novih prodajnih mest.
The grants will be allocated following a public tender.
Nepovratna sredstva bodo dodeljena z javnim razpisom.
In practice, only existing service stations will receive the grant as a service station will never be viable if it sells only methane.
Dejansko bodo nepovratna sredstva dobili le obstoječi bencinski servisi, saj bencinski servis, ki bi prodajal samo metan, nikoli ne bi bil donosen.
Out of the 1974 service stations in the Piedmont Region, only 10 are company-owned/company-operated (Co/Co) and are therefore owned by oil companies.
V regiji Piemont samo 10 izmed 1974 bencinskih servisov sodi v kategorijo družba-lastnik/družba-upravljavec in so torej v lasti naftnih družb.
The remaining 1964 service stations are dealer-owned/dealer-operated (Do/Do) (around 35 %) and company-owned/dealer-operated (Co/Do) (around 65 %).
Preostalih 1964 bencinskih servisov sodi v vzorec trgovec-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec (okrog 35 %) in družba-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec (okrog 65 %).
There is, in the present case, no similar mechanism to the PMS (price management system) clause which would result in the grant being passed through to the oil company in the Do/Do and Co/Do patterns as was the case in Decision 1999/705/EC [20].
V tem primeru ni mehanizma, podobnega klavzuli o sistemu vodenja cen, zaradi katerega bi nepovratna sredstva pri vzorcu trgovec-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec in družba-lastnik/družba upravljavec lahko prešla k naftni družbi, kakor je navedeno v Odločbi 1999/705/ES [20].
Therefore, the same company can receive several grants only in the Co/Co pattern.
Torej lahko ista družba dobi nepovratna sredstva večkrat samo pri vzorcu družba-lastnik/družba-upravljavec.
If it is assumed that the 33 grants will be distributed in proportion to the share of existing Co/Cos, Do/Dos and Co/Dos, it is not possible for an oil company to receive more than one grant.
Ob predvidevanju, da bo razdeljenih 33 pomoči v obliki nepovratnih sredstev, glede na obstoječe razmerje vzorcev družba-lastnik/družba-upravljavec, trgovec-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec in družba-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec ni možnosti, da bi naftna družba dobila nepovratna sredstva več kot enkrat.
It should also be mentioned that currently none of the 14 service stations which sell methane are Co/Cos.
Treba je tudi povedati, da nobeden od 14 bencinskih servisov, ki prodaja metan, ne sodi v vzorec družba-lastnik/družba-upravljavec.
The Italian authorities have furthermore undertaken not to grant any aid to service stations of that type.
Italijanski organi so se tudi dodatno zavezali, da ne bodo podeljevali nepovratnih sredstev bencinskim servisom te vrste.
Given the above, it is therefore inconceivable that an oil company could receive several grants resulting in intra-Community trade being affected within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ob upoštevanju vsega tega torej ni mogoče, da bi naftna družba dobila nepovratna sredstva večkrat in tako vplivala na trgovino znotraj Skupnosti v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
In the light of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the aid scheme notified by the Region of Piedmont for the extension of the network of service stations for the sale of natural gas used as motor fuel does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty,
Komisija glede na navedeno ugotavlja, da program pomoči, ki ga je priglasila regija Piemont za razširitev mreže bencinskih servisov za prodajo zemeljskega plina, ki se uporablja kot pogonsko gorivo, ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES –
The measure which Italy (Region of Piedmont) is planning to implement for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, pursuant to Decision of the Regional Council (DGR) No 67-7675 of 11 November 2002, does not constitute State aid.
Ukrep, ki ga Italija (regija Piemont) v skladu z Odločbo Regionalnega sveta št. 67-7675 z dne 11. novembra 2002 namerava uresničiti za zmanjšanje izpustov toplogrednih plinov, ne pomeni državne pomoči.
Done at Brussels, 26 November 2003.
V Bruslju, 26. novembra 2003
OJ C 183, 2.8.2003, p. 5.
UL C 183, 2.8.2003, str. 5.
OJ L 280, 30.10.1999, p. 87.
UL L 280, 30.10.1999, str. 87.
Case C-382/99 Netherlands v Commission [2002] ECR I-5163.
Zadeva C-382/99 Nizozemska proti Komisiji [2002] Recueil [2002] str. I-5163.
Such as an exclusive purchasing agreement or other binding agreements — and possibly special exclusive clauses linking the supplier and the service stations.
Takšen sporazum o izključni nabavi ali drugi zavezujoči sporazumi – in po možnosti posebne izključne klavzule, ki povezujejo dobavitelja in bencinske servise.
Points 68 to 71 of the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection refer to the commitment laid down in the Kyoto Protocol, signed by the Member States and by the Community, to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also stress that ‘it is still too early to lay down the conditions for authorising any such aid [granted by Member States]’.
Točke 68 do 71 smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja se nanašajo na zavezo, določeno v Kjotskem protokolu, ki so ga podpisale države članice in Skupnost, da bodo omejile ali zmanjšale izpuste toplogrednih plinov, vendar tudi poudarjajo, da „je še prezgodaj določati pogoje za odobritev kakršne koli takšne pomoči, [ki jo podelijo države članice]“.
The figure for Piedmont is 14 if two ‘white outlets’ are taken into account.
Če se upoštevata dve „beli prodajni mesti“, ta številka za Piemont znaša 14.
Situation updated to June 2003.
Položaj, prilagojen stanju junija 2003.
Under Legislative Decree No 32/1998.
V skladu s sodno odločbo št. 32/1998.
In Italian these are called contratto di comodato and contratto di somministrazione respectively.
V italijanščini se imenujeta contratto di comodato in contratto di somministrazione, v tem zaporedju.
In relation to the discussion of the Dutch precedent, see points 17 to 22 above.
Glede razprave o nizozemskem primeru glej točke 17–22 zgoraj.
In Italian contratto di convenzionamento; the duration of these contracts is variable, often one year, and at all events less than five.
V italijanskih contratto di convenzionamento je trajanje teh pogodb različno; pogosto trajajo eno leto in vsekakor največ pet let.
These observations, although not necessarily fully shared by the Commission, are not examined in detail since the assessment concludes that the proposed measure does not constitute State aid.
Te pripombe, čeprav ni nujno, da se Komisija popolnoma strinja z njimi, se ne preučijo podrobno zaradi sklepa ocene, da pri predlaganem ukrepu ne gre za državno pomoč.
Other Commission documents or programmes cited by the German Government in support of its position are: the Commission Green Paper ‘Towards a European strategy for the security of energy supply’; Directive 1999/30/EC (on limit values for various substances in ambient air); the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010’; the Civitas I and Civitas II (Clean urban transport) Community R & D programmes; and the Commission communication on alternative fuels for road transportation and on a set of measures to promote the use of biofuels (COM(2001) 547 final).
Drugi dokumenti ali programi Komisije, ki jih nemška vlada navaja v podporo svojemu stališču, so: zelena knjiga Komisije „K evropski strategiji za varnost oskrbe z energijo“; Direktiva 1999/30/ES (o mejnih vrednostih žveplenega dioksida, dušikovega dioksida in dušikovih oksidov, trdnih delcev in svinca raznih snovi v zunanjem zraku); bela knjiga Komisije „Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010“; raziskovalni in razvojni programi Skupnosti Civitas I in Civitas II (čist mestni promet); in sporočilo Komisije o nadomestnih gorivih za cestne prevoze in nizu ukrepov za spodbujanje uporabe bio goriv (COM(2001) 547 konč.).
See in particular point 85 of the Decision.
Glej zlasti točko 85 Odločbe.
company-owned/company-operated (Co/Co) service stations, where the service station is operated by employees or subsidiaries of the oil company.
družba-lastnik/družba-upravljavec bencinskih servisov, kjer zaposleni ali hčerinska podjetja naftne družbe upravljajo bencinski servis.
They bear no risk and are not free to choose their supplier.
Ne nosijo nobenega tveganja in si ne smejo svobodno izbirati dobavitelja.
control panels,
kontrolne plošče
housings for compressors,
ohišja za kompresorje
The budget amounts to around EUR 5 million. The duration of the scheme is conditional on the budget allocation.
Proračun znaša približno 5 milijonov EUR. Trajanje programa je odvisno od dodeljevanja predvidenih sredstev.
The latter is scheduled for the years 2002, 2003 and 2004.
To je načrtovano za leta 2002, 2003 in 2004.
of 1 February 2006
z dne 1. februarja 2006
amending Decision 2005/393/EC as regards the restricted zones in relation to bluetongue in Spain and Portugal
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/393/ES glede območij z omejitvami zaradi bolezni modrikastega jezika v Španiji in na Portugalskem
(notified under document number C(2006) 180)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 180)
Directive 2000/75/EC lays down control rules and measures to combat bluetongue in the Community, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones and a ban on animals leaving those zones.
Direktiva 2000/75/ES določa pravila in ukrepe nadzora za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika v Skupnosti, vključno z določitvijo okuženih in ogroženih območij ter prepovedjo premikov živali z navedenih območij.
Commission Decision 2005/393/EC of 23 May 2005 on protection and surveillance zones in relation to bluetongue and conditions applying to movements from or through these zones [2] provides for the demarcation of the global geographic areas where protection and surveillance zones (the restricted zones) are to be established by the Member States in relation to bluetongue.
Odločba Komisije 2005/393/ES z dne 23. maja 2005 o okuženih in ogroženih območjih zaradi bolezni modrikastega jezika in o pogojih, ki veljajo za premike s teh območij ali prek teh območij [2], določa razmejitev globalnih geografskih območij, kjer morajo države članice vzpostaviti okužena in ogrožena območja (območja z omejitvami) zaradi bolezni modrikastega jezika.
Spain and Portugal have informed the Commission that serotype 4 virus has been detected as circulating in a number of peripheral areas of restricted Zone E.
Španija in Portugalska sta obvestili Komisijo, da so odkrili širjenje virusa serotip 4 na številnih obrobnih delih območja z omejitvami E.
Consequently, those restricted zones should be extended, taking account of the data available on the ecology of the vector and the development of its seasonal activity.
Zato je treba ob upoštevanju razpoložljivih podatkov o prenašalcu bolezni in razvoju njegove sezonske aktivnosti razširiti navedena območja z omejitvami.
In Annex I to Decision 2005/393/EC, the lists of restricted zones in Zone E, which relate to Spain and Portugal, are replaced by the following:
V Prilogi I k Odločbi 2005/393/ES se seznama območij z omejitvami v območju E za Španijo in Portugalsko nadomestita z:
Province of Cádiz, Málaga, Sevilla, Huelva, Córdoba, Cáceres, Badajoz, Toledo and Ciudad Real
Province Cádiz, Málaga, Sevilla, Huelva, Córdoba, Cáceres, Badajoz, Toledo in Ciudad Real
Province of Jaen (comarcas of Jaen, Andujar, Alcala la Real, Huelma, Linares, Santiesteban del Puerto, Ubeda)
Provinca Jaen (comarcas Jaen, Andujar, Alcala la Real, Huelma, Linares, Santiesteban del Puerto, Ubeda)
Province of Avila (comarcas de Arenas de San Pedro, Candelada, Cebreros, Las Navas del Marques, Navaluenga, Sotillo de la Adrada)
Provinca Avila (comarcas Arenas de San Pedro, Candelada, Cebreros, Las Navas del Marques, Navaluenga, Sotillo de la Adrada)
Province of Salamanca (comarcas of Bejar, Ciudad Rodrigo and Sequeros)
Provinca Salamanca (comarcas Bejar, Ciudad Rodrigo in Sequeros)
Province of Madrid (comarcas of Aranjuez, El Escorial, Grinon, Navalcarnero and San Martin de Valdeiglesias)’
Provinca Madrid (comarcas Aranjuez, El Escorial, Grinon, Navalcarnero in San Martin de Valdeiglesias).“
‘Portugal:
„Portugalska:
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Algarve: all concelhos
Regijski direktorat za kmetijstvo Algarve: vse concelhos
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Alentejo: all concelhos
Regijski direktorat za kmetijstvo Alentejo: vse concelhos
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Ribatejo e Oeste: concelhos of Almada, Barreiro, Moita, Seixal, Sesimbra, Montijo, Coruche, Setúbal, Palmela, Alcochete, Benavente, Salvaterra de Magos, Almeirim, Alpiarça, Chamusca, Constância, Abrantes and Sardoal.
Regijski direktorat za kmetijstvo Ribatejo in Oeste: concelhos Almada, Barreiro, Moita, Seixal, Sesimbra, Montijo, Coruche, Setúbal, Palmela, Alcochete, Benavente, Salvaterra de Magos, Almeirim, Alpiarça, Chamusca, Constância, Abrantes in Sardoal.
Regional Direction of Agriculture of Beira Interior: concelhos of Penamacor, Fundão, Oleiros, Sertã, Vila de Rei, Idanha a Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-nova, Vila Velha de Rodao and Mação.’
Regijski direktorat za kmetijstvo Beira Interior: concelhos Penamacor, Fundão, Oleiros, Sertã, Vila de Rei, Idanha-a-Nova, Castelo Branco, Proença-a-Nova, Vila Velha de Rodão in Mação.“
This Decision shall apply from 7 February 2006.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 7. februarja 2006
Done at Brussels, 1 February 2006.
V Bruslju, 1. februarja 2006
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/828/EC (OJ L 311, 26.11.2005, p. 37).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2005/828/ES (UL L 311, 26.11.2005, str. 37).
of 3 February 2006
z dne 3. februarja 2006
amending Decision 97/467/EC as regards the inclusion of one establishment in Uruguay in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import ratite meat
o spremembi Odločbe 97/467/ES zaradi vključitve obrata v Urugvaju na začasne sezname obratov v tretjih državah, iz katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz mesa ratitov
(notified under document number C(2006) 233)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 233)