natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the absence of any other comments concerning the product concerned and like product, recitals 11 to 13 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka, se uvodne izjave (11) do (13) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments regarding the granting of MET, the conclusions reached in recitals 14 to 17 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede odobritve TGO, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (14) do (17) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdijo.
Following provisional disclosure, no comments were received concerning the methodology for determining normal value.
Po predložitvi začasnih razkritij Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb glede metodologije za določitev normalne vrednosti.
Accordingly, the conclusions reached in recitals 18 to 34 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Zato se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (18) do (34) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdijo.
In the absence of any relevant comments regarding export prices, the conclusions reached in recital 35 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb glede izvoznih cen ni bilo, se sklepne ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (35) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdijo.
In the absence of any comments regarding the comparison between the normal value and the export prices, the conclusions reached in recitals 36 to 37 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker ni bilo pripomb glede primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvoznimi cenami, se sklepni ugotovitvi iz uvodnih izjav (36) in (37) začasne uredbe dokončno potrdita.
For the cooperating exporting producers granted MET
Za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, ki jim je bil odobren TGO
Two exporting producers submitted claims concerning the detailed calculations made for establishing the level of the provisional dumping margins found.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta predložila zahtevka glede podrobnih izračunov za določitev začasnih stopenj dampinga.
These comments were considered in light of the revised data obtained during the verification visits as outlined in recital 4 of this Regulation.
Te pripombe so se upoštevale glede na pregledane podatke, pridobljene med preveritvenimi obiski, kot je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (4) te uredbe.
Furthermore, some calculation errors were corrected.
Popravljene so bile tudi nekatere napake pri izračunu.
Accordingly, the definitive weighted average dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price duty unpaid, are:
Dokončne tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF na meji Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve so:
For all other exporting producers
Za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike
Following provisional disclosure, no comments were received concerning the methodology for calculating the dumping margin for all other exporting producers.
Po predložitvi začasnih razkritij Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb glede metodologije za izračun stopnje dampinga za vse druge proizvajalce izvoznike.
Accordingly, the provisional countrywide level of dumping of 34,9 % of the cif Community frontier price is definitively confirmed.
V skladu s tem se začasna stopnja dampinga na ravni države v višini 34,9 % cene CIF na meji Skupnosti dokončno potrdi.
In the absence of comments concerning Community production, recitals 43 to 44 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede proizvodnje Skupnosti, se uvodni izjavi (43) in (44) začasne uredbe potrdita.
One importer submitted that some of the Community producers which were originally complainants had ceased production, and asked the Commission to verify whether there was still enough support for the investigation according to Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
En uvoznik je predložil informacijo, da so nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki so bili prvotno pritožniki, opustili proizvodnjo, in je Komisijo zaprosil, da preveri, ali to pomeni dovolj podpore za preiskavo v skladu s členom 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
In this respect, the investigation confirmed that the producers supporting the complaint represented over 95 % of the estimated Community production during the IP.
V zvezi s tem je preiskava potrdila, da so proizvajalci, ki podpirajo pritožbo, v OP predstavljali več kot 95 % ocenjene proizvodnje Skupnosti.
Therefore, the requirements of Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation are fulfilled.
Zato so zahteve iz člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe izpolnjene.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the definition of the Community industry, recital 45 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb glede opredelitve industrije Skupnosti ni bilo, se uvodna izjava (45) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning the Community consumption, recital 46 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker pripomb glede potrošnje Skupnosti ni bilo, se uvodna izjava (46) začasne uredbe potrdi.
In the absence of any comments concerning the imports from the country concerned, recitals 47 to 52 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb glede uvoza iz zadevne države, se uvodne izjave (47) do (52) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One importer/user and one exporter objected to the analysis in the provisional Regulation based on the argument that some EC producers had ceased production, and should therefore not have been taken into consideration in assessing the situation of the Community industry.
En uvoznik/uporabnik in en izvoznik sta nasprotovala analizi iz začasne uredbe, ker sta bila mnenja, da so nekateri proizvajalci ES opustili proizvodnjo in jih zato ne bi smeli upoštevati pri ocenjevanju položaja industrije Skupnosti.
It should be noted that the Commission’s analysis of the factors mentioned in Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation did not include any data from the companies which had ceased production.
Treba je opomniti, da analiza dejavnikov, omenjenih v členu 3(5) osnovne uredbe, ki jo je opravila Komisija, ni vključevala nobenih podatkov družb, ki so opustile proizvodnjo.
Such companies were mentioned in the provisional Regulation only insofar as necessary for interpreting some aggregate indicators such as for example market shares or total production capacity.
Take družbe so bilo omenjene v začasni uredbi le kolikor je bilo potrebno za razlago nekaterih zbirnih kazalnikov, kot so na primer tržni deleži ali celotna proizvodna zmogljivost.
This was each time clearly explained in the text presenting each indicator concerned, in order to give a complete and correct assessment of the situation of the Community industry.
To je bilo vsakič jasno pojasnjeno v besedilu, ki opredeljuje posamezen zadevni kazalnik z namenom točne in pravilne ocene položaja industrije Skupnosti.
Therefore, it is considered that the analysis of the situation of the Community industry was made in full accordance with the basic Regulation.
Zato se šteje, da je bila analiza položaja industrije Skupnosti opravljena v celoti v skladu z osnovno uredbo.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the situation of the Community industry, recitals 53 to 82 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb glede položaja industrije Skupnosti ni bilo, se uvodne izjave (53) do (82) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One exporter argued that the Community producers had a dominant position in the market and that Chinese imports, with only 11,5 % of the market, could not be the main cause of injury.
En izvoznik je trdil, da so imeli proizvajalci Skupnosti prevladujoč položaj na trgu in da kitajski uvoz z le 11,5 % trga ni mogel biti glavni vzrok škode.
As for the market share of PRC exports, it is estimated at between 11,5 and 15,8 %, according to whether Eurostat or Chinese statistical sources are used.
Opomniti je treba, da je tržni delež kitajskega izvoza ocenjen med 11,5 % in 15,8 %, glede na to, ali so bili uporabljeni podatki Eurostata ali kitajski statistični viri.
Even a conservatively estimated market share of 11,5 % cannot be considered insignificant given that, as mentioned in the provisional Regulation, injury was clearly caused by the increasing pressure of growing imports at prices substantially undercutting the prices of the Community industry.
Tudi previdna ocena tržnega deleža v višini 11,5 % se ne more šteti za nepomembno glede na to, da je škodo jasno povzročil vse večji pritisk naraščajočega uvoza na cene, ki znatno nelojalno nižajo cene industrije Skupnosti, kot je omenjeno v začasni uredbi.
As to whether or not the Community industry had a dominant position is ultimately not relevant if it is established that the Community industry suffered injury from no other substantial causes than the dumped imports.
Vprašanje, ali ima industrija Skupnosti prevladujoč položaj ali ne, nazadnje ni pomembno, če se ugotovi, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela škodo, glavni razlog zanjo pa je dampinški uvoz.
In this respect, it should be noted that, despite its larger market share, the Community industry had not been able to avoid major losses during the period considered.
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti, da se industrija Skupnosti med zadevnim obdobjem kljub svojemu velikemu tržnemu deležu ni mogla izogniti večjim izgubam.
This contradicts the claim that it has benefited from a dominant position.
To je v nasprotju s trditvijo, da je imela koristi od prevladujočega položaja.
Moreover, imports from third countries also ensured that there was sufficient competition in the market.
Poleg tega je uvoz tretjih držav tudi zagotovil, da je na trgu vladala zadostna konkurenca.
Another exporter pointed out that the new production brought into the market by the two recently established EC producers was more important than the increase in Chinese imports and therefore injury would have been self-inflicted.
Drugi izvoznik je poudaril, da je bila nova proizvodnja, ki sta jo na trgu uvedla nedavno ustanovljena proizvajalca ES, pomembnejša kot povečanje kitajskega uvoza in naj bi zato industrija Skupnosti sama sebi povzročila škodo.
However, the prices of the new EC producers were in line with those of the established ones and their production was less than the production of the companies which had ceased business.
Vendar so bile cene novih proizvajalcev ES v skladu s cenami že ustaljenih proizvajalcev, njihov obseg proizvodnje pa je bil manjši od obsega proizvodnje družb, ki so prenehale poslovati.
For these reasons, without the Chinese imports, their entry into the market could not explain the price collapse, which occurred in a context of increasing Community consumption.
Zato njihov vstop na trg ne more biti edini razlog za padec cen, ki se je pojavil pri povečani potrošnji Skupnosti, ampak je razlog tudi kitajski uvoz.
Another exporter claimed that the regulatory framework of the common agricultural policy distorts normal market conditions for the EC producers and that the causation analysis failed to take this into account.
Drugi izvoznik je trdil, da ureditveni okvir skupne kmetijske politike izkrivlja normalne tržne pogoje za proizvajalce ES in da se analiza vzročne zveze ni upoštevala.
Although this argument was only made in very general terms, it should be noted that the common agricultural policy does not regulate the price of TA itself, but only sets minimum prices for some of the inputs in TA production as well as a selling price for alcohol.
Čeprav je ta utemeljitev zelo splošna, je treba opomniti, da skupna kmetijska politika ne ureja cene VK, temveč le določa najnižje cene surovin, ki se uporabljajo za proizvodnjo VK, ter prodajne cene za alkohol.
In the absence of any other comments concerning causality, recitals 83 to 95 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb glede vzročne zveze, se uvodne izjave (83) do (95) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
One user from the gypsum industry claimed that the proportion represented by TA in the gypsum industry’s production costs, mentioned in the provisional Regulation (less than 2 %) was too low.
En uporabnik iz industrije proizvodnje mavca je trdil, da je delež VK v proizvodnih stroških industrije proizvodnje mavca, omenjen v začasni uredbi (manj kot 2 %), prenizek.
This figure was, however, based on the data submitted by the same company.
Vendar je ta številka temeljila na podatkih, ki jih je predložila ista družba.
According to the same data, the figure would be slightly higher, if it is expressed as a percentage of only those products containing TA.
Na podlagi istih podatkov bi bila številka nekoliko višja, če bi bila izražena kot odstotek samo tistih izdelkov, ki vsebujejo VK.
On the other hand, two other gypsum groups have indicated much lower percentages than this.
Na drugi strani pa sta dve drugi skupini s področja proizvodnje mavca navedli veliko nižji odstotek.
This confirmed that the data used in the provisional Regulation can be considered to be a reasonable estimate.
S tem je bilo potrjeno, da se lahko podatki, uporabljeni v začasni uredbi, štejejo kot primerna ocena.
Moreover, it is recalled that the gypsum products in which TA is used as a retardant are not exposed to much competition from non-EC suppliers, according to Eurostat data.
Poleg tega se opozarja na to, da na podlagi podatkov Eurostata izdelki iz mavca, v katerih se VK uporablja kot zaviralno sredstvo, niso izpostavljeni preveliki konkurenci dobaviteljev, ki niso iz ES.
The conclusion of the provisional Regulation, that a moderate dumping duty on this percentage of the costs should not have a major impact upon the costs and competitive position of those user industries, is therefore maintained.
Sklep začasne uredbe, da zmerna dampinška dajatev na ta odstotek stroškov ne bi smela imeti večjega vpliva na stroške in konkurenčni položaj navedenih industrij uporabnikov, se zato ohrani.
The same user also argued that the measures could lead to shortages of TA, as was claimed to have happened in the past.
Isti uporabnik je tudi trdil, da bi lahko ukrepi privedli do pomanjkanja VK, kar naj bi se bilo zgodilo že v preteklosti.
However, it is not considered that anti-dumping duties of the proposed individual levels on imports of TA manufactured by companies representing about two-thirds of PRC exports would foreclose the EC market to PRC suppliers.
Vendar pa se ne šteje, da bi protidampinške dajatve predlaganih individualnih stopenj za družbe, ki pomenijo približno dve tretjini izvoza iz LRK, izključile dobavitelje iz LRK s trga ES.
One user from the emulsifier industry argued that their competitive position would be jeopardised if measures were introduced on imports of TA originating in the PRC.
En uporabnik iz industrije emulgatorjev je trdil, da bi bil njihov konkurenčni položaj ogrožen, če bi bili uvedeni ukrepi za uvoz VK s poreklom iz LRK.
This user claimed that due to technical change, emulsifiers are increasingly subject to competition from non-EU producers and that a cost increase following the imposition of measures would affect their competitive position in the market.
Ta uporabnik je trdil, da so emulgatorji zaradi tehničnih sprememb čedalje bolj soočeni s konkurenco proizvajalcev, ki niso iz EU, in da bi povečanje stroškov po uvedbi ukrepov vplivalo na njihov konkurenčni položaj na trgu.
The Commission tried to verify the possible effect of measures on this category of users on the basis of quantified data.
Komisija je na podlagi kvantitativnih podatkov poskusila preveriti morebitni učinek ukrepov na to kategorijo uporabnikov.
However, in the absence of meaningful replies to the Commission’s questionnaire and of cooperation from this group of users, this was not possible.
Vendar je bilo to zaradi pomanjkanja smiselnih odgovorov na vprašalnik Komisije in pomanjkanja sodelovanja te skupine uporabnikov nemogoče.
In the absence of any other comments concerning Community interest, recitals 98 to 114 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi z interesom Skupnosti ni bilo, se uvodne izjave (98) do (114) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Further to the disclosure of provisional findings, the Community industry claimed that the calculated non-injurious price was too low on two grounds:
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev je industrija Skupnosti trdila, da je izračunana neškodljiva cena iz dveh razlogov prenizka:
the price of raw materials was depressed during the IP, i.e. the industry had managed to pass on to the upstream sectors some of the pressure on prices.
cena surovin je bila v OP znižana, tj. industriji je uspelo nekaj pritiska na cene prenesti na nabavne sektorje.
This is recognised in recital 69 of the provisional Regulation, whilst the interest of suppliers is analysed under recitals 101 to 106.
To je ugotovljeno v uvodni izjavi (69) začasne uredbe, interes dobaviteljev pa se analizira v uvodnih izjavah (101) do (106).
As mentioned in recital 89 of the provisional Regulation, the common agricultural policy sets out only a minimum price for the purchases of raw material.
Kakor je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (89), pa skupna kmetijska politika določa najnižjo ceno za nabavo surovin.
Furthermore, the industry did not substantiate its claim and did not submit any evidence indicating that the price level of raw materials would not be sustainable and should be higher than that minimum.
Poleg tega industrija svojega zahtevka ni utemeljila in ni predložila nobenega dokaza z navedbo, da raven cene surovin ne bi bila trajnostna in bi morala biti višja kot navedena najnižja raven.
Therefore, it was concluded that the argument was unfounded,
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da argument ni utemeljen,
it was claimed that the normal profit margin used in the injury calculation, 8 %, was too low for this type of industry.
trdilo se je, da je bila običajna stopnja dobička, uporabljena v izračunu škode, v višini 8 %, za to vrsto industrije prenizka.
However, given the level of profits observed for the Community industry in the years before the IP and prior to the market penetration of the dumped imports, this percentage represents an adequate margin to reflect a normal profit level that could be achieved in the absence of such imports.
Vendar ta odstotek glede na stopnjo dobička, ugotovljeno za industrijo Skupnosti v letih pred OP in pred vdorom dampinškega uvoza na trg, pomeni ustrezno stopnjo, ki odraža običajno stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo bilo mogoče doseči brez takega uvoza.
In the absence of any other comments concerning the injury elimination level, recitals 115 to 118 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb v zvezi s stopnjo odprave škode ni bilo, se uvodne izjave (115) do (118) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Form and level of the duties
Oblika in raven dajatev
In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margins found, since for all the exporting producers concerned the injury margins were found to be higher than the dumping margins.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na ravni ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga, saj so bile stopnje škode, ugotovljene za vse zadevne proizvajalce izvoznike, višje kot stopnje dampinga.
Regarding the form of the measures, the Community industry required that a minimum price based on the injury elimination level should be imposed.
Glede oblike ukrepov je industrija Skupnosti zahtevala, da se uvede najnižja cena na podlagi stopnje odprave škode.
However, since the level of the definitive anti-dumping duty is based on the dumping margins found, as mentioned in the above recital, the imposition of the definitive anti-dumping duty in form of ad valorem duties is maintained.
Ker pa raven dokončne protidampinške dajatve temelji na ugotovljenih stopnjah dampinga, kakor je omenjeno v gornji uvodni izjavi, se ohrani uvedba dokončne protidampinške dajatve v obliki dajatev ad valorem.
On the basis of the above, the definitive duties are as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega so dokončne dajatve naslednje:
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Stopnje protidampinške dajatve za posamezne družbe, navedene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev te preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo stanje, v kakršnem so bile med preiskavo te družbe.
These duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celotno državo, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se tako izključno uporabljajo za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države, ki jih izdelajo družbe, ter torej posamezne navedene pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih izdela katera koli druga družba, ki v izvedbenem delu te uredbe ni posebej navedena z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s posebej navedenimi pravnimi osebami, ne morejo biti upravičeni do teh stopenj in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh stopenj protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje, domače in izvozne prodaje, povezanimi s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will then be amended accordingly by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Če bo primerno, se bo Uredba ustrezno spremenila s posodobitvijo seznama družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatve.
In order to ensure a proper enforcement of the anti-dumping duty, the residual duty level should not only apply to the non-cooperating exporters, but also to those companies which did not have any exports during the IP.
Za zagotavljanje ustreznega uveljavljanja protidampinške dajatve bi se morala stopnja preostale dajatve uporabljati ne le za nesodelujoče izvoznike, ampak tudi za družbe, ki niso izvažale v OP.
However, the latter companies are invited, when they fulfil the requirements of Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, second paragraph, to present a request for a review pursuant to that Article in order to have their situation examined individually.
Slednje pa so pozvane, da potem ko izpolnijo zahteve iz drugega odstavka člena 11(4) osnovne uredbe, predložijo zahtevek za pregled v skladu z navedenim členom, da se njihovo stanje individualno prouči.
Definitive collection of provisional duties
Dokončno pobiranje začasnih dajatev