natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, the information supplied by the company (cotton purchase prices from 1997 to 2005 in PKR) showed a downward trend, with 1997 having seen the highest prices.
Poleg tega so podatki, ki jih je zagotovila družba (nabavne cene bombaža med letoma 1997 in 2005 v PKR), kazale na trend upadanja; najvišje so bile leta 1997.
If there are important fluctuations of an input, this could normally be addressed by making a monthly or quarterly comparison of normal value and export prices.
Pomembna nihanja pri vhodnih izdelkih se običajno analizirajo z mesečnimi ali četrtletnimi primerjavami normalne vrednosti z izvoznimi cenami.
However, that was not requested here.
V tem primeru to ni bilo zahtevano.
All companies claimed adjustments for duty drawback, pursuant to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Vse družbe so zahtevale prilagoditve za povračilo dajatev v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Claims for such adjustments were accepted in the original investigation insofar as the amounts claimed were actually borne by the like product and by the materials physically incorporated therein, when intended for consumption in the exporting country, and refunded in respect of the product exported to the Community.
V prvotni preiskavi so bili pri zahtevkih za take prilagoditve odobreni le zneski, ki so bili dejansko plačani za podobne izdelke in za material, fizično vdelan vanj, če so bili izdelki namenjeni porabi v državi izvoznici oziroma če so bili zneski povrnjeni za izdelke, izvožene v Skupnost.
It was found that, in the present investigation, the amounts refunded by the Pakistani government exceeded by far the amounts of imports charges or indirect taxes actually paid by the companies on materials incorporated in the product concerned.
V tej preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zneski, ki jih je pakistanska vlada povrnila, daleč presegali zneske uvoznih dajatev ali posrednih davkov, ki so jih družbe dejansko plačale za materiale, ki so vdelani v zadevni izdelek.
The sampled exporters argued that the Government of Pakistan had introduced a new system for the calculation of these refunds of import duties paid by the exporting producers.
Vzorčeni izvozniki so trdili, da je pakistanska vlada uvedla nov sistem za izračun teh vračil uvoznih dajatev, ki so jih plačali proizvajalci izvozniki.
This new system uses certain standards for the determination of the amount refundable.
Ta novi sistem uporablja nekatere standarde za določitev vračljivega zneska.
The new regime was investigated in order to clarify if a direct link between the duty paid by the exporting producers and the material physically incorporated in the like product intended for consumption in the exporting country could be established.
Ta nova ureditev je bila proučena, da se razjasni, če obstaja neposredna povezava med dajatvijo, ki so jo plačali proizvajalci izvozniki, in materialom, fizično vdelanim v podobni izdelek, namenjen potrošnji v državi izvoznici.
Where the sampled exporters could show that import duties had been reimbursed, the Community institutions accepted the claim for an adjustment to normal value, where appropriate, insofar as the amounts claimed were actually borne by the like product and by materials physically incorporated therein, when intended for consumption in the exporting country, and refunded in respect of the product exported to the Community.
Kadar so vzorčeni izvozniki lahko dokazali, da so bile uvozne dajatve povrnjene, so institucije Skupnosti odobrile zahtevek za prilagoditev normalne vrednosti v višini zneskov, ki so bili dejansko plačani za podobni izdelek in za fizično vdelan material, če je bil izdelek namenjen za porabo v državi, oziroma so bili zneski povrnjeni za blago, izvoženo v Skupnost.
For the sampled exporting producers, individual dumping margins were established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average export price, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation.
Za vzorčene proizvajalce izvoznike so bile individualne stopnje dampinga določene na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, are:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek neto cene franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, so:
In accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, it is concluded that the dumping margin for Fairdeal Textiles (Pvt) Ltd is de minimis, as its margin of dumping is below 2 %.
V skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe se sklene, da je stopnja dampinga za Fairdeal Textiles (Pvt) Ltd de minimis stopnja, saj je stopnja dampinga te družbe nižja od 2 %.
For the cooperating companies not selected in the sample, the dumping margin was established on the basis of the weighted average dumping margin of the companies selected in the sample, pursuant to Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation.
Za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile zbrane v vzorec, je bila stopnja dampinga določena na podlagi tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga družb, izbranih v vzorec, v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe.
This weighted average dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, was 5,8 %.
Ta tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek neto cene franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, je bila 5,8 %.
Several cooperating exporters not selected in the sample claimed that it was discriminatory not to receive the lowest duty instead of the weighted average duty of the sampled companies.
Številni sodelujoči izvozniki, ki niso bili izbrani v vzorec, so trdili, da bi bilo diskriminatorno, da ne bi prejeli najnižje dajatve namesto tehtanega povprečja dajatve vzorčenih družb.
It is noted that in this case, eight exporters were selected in the sample in accordance with the provisions of Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Treba je opomniti, da je bilo v tem primeru v vzorec izbranih osem izvoznikov v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
The findings made as based on data supplied by these exporters are deemed to be representative for the bedlinen industry in Pakistan.
Ugotovitve, pridobljene na podlagi podatkov teh izvoznikov, se štejejo za reprezentativne za industrijo posteljnega perila v Pakistanu.
In relation to the duty to be applied to the non-sampled exporters, it would be contrary to the purpose of sampling to apply the lowest duty established for one of the sampled exporters rather than the weighted average duty which is clearly more representative of the industry as a whole.
V zvezi z dajatvijo, ki jo je treba uvesti za nevzorčene izvoznike, bi bila uvedba najnižje dajatve, določene za enega od vzorčenih izvoznikov, namesto tehtanega povprečja dajatve, ki je očitno bolj reprezentativna za celotno industrijo, v nasprotju s ciljem vzorčenja.
In any event, Article 9(6) of the basic Regulation requires that the anti-dumping duty applicable to imports from exporters who have made themselves known, but are not included in the sample, shall not exceed the weighted average margin of dumping established for the parties in the sample and it is the consistent practice of the Community institutions to apply the weighted average margin.
V vsakem primeru člen 9(6) osnovne uredbe zahteva, da protidampinška dajatev, ki se nanaša na uvoz od izvoznikov, ki so se javili, vendar niso bili vključeni v preiskavo, ne presega tehtanega povprečja stopnje dampinga, ki je bilo ugotovljeno za stranke v vzorcu in ustaljena praksa institucij Skupnosti je, da se uporablja tehtana povprečna stopnja.
In light of the above, this claim was rejected.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bil ta zahtevek zavrnjen.
In order to determine the residual dumping margin, the level of cooperation was first established.
Za določitev preostale stopnje dampinga je bila najprej ugotovljena stopnja sodelovanja.
A comparison between Eurostat data concerning imports originating in Pakistan and sampling replies showed that the level of cooperation was high (more than 80 %).
Primerjava med podatki Eurostata glede uvoza s poreklom iz Pakistana in izpolnjeni vprašalniki glede vzorčenja so pokazali, da je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka (več kot 80 %).
Therefore, and since there were no indications that the remaining companies were dumping at a lower level, it was considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for the remaining companies, which had not cooperated in the investigation, at the level of the highest dumping margin found for the companies included in the sample.
Glede na to in ker ni bilo drugih podatkov, da je bil damping ostalih družb na nižji stopnji, se je zdelo primerno določiti stopnjo dampinga za preostale družbe, ki niso sodelovale v preiskavi, na najvišjo stopnjo dampinga, ugotovljeno za družbe, vključene v vzorec.
This approach is in accordance with the standing practice of the Community institutions and was also considered necessary in order not to provide an incentive to non-cooperation.
Ta pristop je v skladu z ustaljeno prakso institucij Skupnosti in se je zdel potreben, da se nesodelovanje ne bi spodbujalo.
Therefore, the residual dumping margin was calculated at the rate of 8,5 %.
Zato je bila preostala stopnja dampinga izračunana na stopnji 8,5 %.
A number of companies which had been considered as non-cooperating claimed that they had indeed sent the sampling return within the time limits either through their respective association or directly to the Commission.
Številne družbe, ki so veljale za nesodelujoče, so trdile, da so vprašalnike o vzorčenju dejansko poslale pravočasno bodisi preko svojega združenja bodisi neposredno Komisiji.
These companies were requested to provide evidence that the replies indeed had been transmitted within the requested deadlines.
Te družbe so bile pozvane, da predložijo dokaze, da so bili izpolnjeni vprašalniki res poslani v okviru zahtevanih rokov.
None of these companies could submit sufficient evidence to support such claims which were therefore rejected.
Nobena od teh družb ni predložila zadostnega dokaza v podporo tem trditvam, zato so bile te zavrnjene.
Lasting nature of the changed circumstances
Trajna narava spremenjenih okoliščin
In the present investigation, the aim of the review was to base the conclusion on the findings of verified data, which had, in principle, become possible following the change in circumstances regarding the security situation.
V tej preiskavi je bil cilj pregleda, da sklepi temeljijo na ugotovitvah preverjenih podatkov, kar je bilo načeloma omogočeno po spremembi varnostnih razmer.
There are no indications that the new verified findings would not be of a lasting nature.
Ni podatkov o tem, da nove preverjene ugotovitve ne bi bile trajne narave.
However, it should be noted that due to some remaining security concerns, the verifications took place in the UAE.
Kljub temu je treba ponovno opozoriti, da so bila zaradi nekaterih preostalih varnostnih pomislekov preverjanja opravljena v Združenih arabskih emiratih.
Despite the efforts made by the cooperating exporting producers, a verification in a third country does not comply with the normal practice as the Commission investigators did not have unlimited direct access to the accounting registers and the accounting systems of the exporters.
Kljub prizadevanjem sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, preverjanje v tretji državi ni v skladu z običajno prakso, ker preiskovalci Komisije niso imeli neomejenega neposrednega dostopa do računovodskih evidenc in računovodskih sistemov izvoznikov.
Therefore, albeit the findings are sufficiently reliable to justify a modification in the level of the anti-dumping duties, on its own initiative or at the request of interested parties the Community institutions might carry out a review of the modified antidumping duties should available information sources point out to a change or otherwise inaccuracy of the findings verified in the third country.
Čeprav so ugotovitve dovolj zanesljive, da se upraviči spremembo v stopnji protidampinških dajatev, lahko institucije Skupnosti na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo zainteresiranih strank izvedejo revizijo spremenjenih protidampinških dajatev, če bi dostopni viri informacij kazali na spremembo ali nepravilnost ugotovitev, preverjenih v tretji državi.
In view of the above, the present antidumping measures on imports of the product concerned originating in Pakistan should be amended to reflect the new dumping margins found.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba trenutne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Pakistana spremeniti tako, da bodo odražali nove ugotovljene stopnje dampinga.
According to Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, the duties should not exceed the margin of dumping established but should be less than the margin if such lesser duty would be adequate to remove the injury of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe dajatve ne smejo presegati ugotovljene dampinške stopnje, ampak morajo biti nižje od te stopnje, če taka nižja dajatev zadošča za odpravo škode industrije Skupnosti.
Given the fact that the present interim review is limited to the examination of the dumping aspects, the level of duties imposed should not be higher than the injury levels found in the original investigation.
Glede na dejstvo, da je ta vmesni pregled omejen na proučitev vidikov dampinga, uvedena stopnja dajatev ne sme biti višja od stopenj škode, ugotovljenih v prvotni preiskavi.
As mentioned in recital 134 of the definitive Regulation, the original dumping margin was lower than the injury elimination level definitely determined and therefore the definitive anti-dumping duty was based on the lower dumping margin, namely 13,1 %.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 134 končne uredbe, je bila prvotna stopnja dampinga nižja od končno določene stopnje odprave škode in zato je dokončna protidampinška dajatev temeljila na nižji stopnji dampinga, namreč 13,1 %.
Since the dumping margins found in the present interim review are still lower than the injury margin, the amended anti-dumping duties should be based on these lower dumping margins.
Ker so ugotovljene stopnje dampinga v tem vmesnem pregledu še vedno nižje od stopnje škode, morajo spremenjene protidampinške dajatve temeljiti na teh nižjih stopnjah dampinga.
Therefore, the level of duties should be set at that of the dumping margins found, except for one company, for which a de minimis dumping margin has been found as outlined in recital 58:
Zato mora biti stopnja dajatev enaka ugotovljenim stopnjam dampinga, razen za eno družbo, za katero je bila ugotovljena stopnja dampinga de minimis, kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi 58:
For the exporters in the sample:
Za izvoznike, vključene v vzorec:
For the cooperating exporters not included in the sample
Za sodelujoče izvoznike, ki niso vključeni v vzorec
For all other companies
Za vse druge družbe
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the amendment of the existing measures and were given an opportunity to comment.
Vse zadevne stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo priporočiti spremembo obstoječih ukrepov, prav tako jim je bila dana možnost, da predložijo pripombe.
Comments were received and taken into consideration where appropriate.
Pripombe so bile prejete in se jih je upoštevalo, kjer je bilo primerno.
All parties concerned were also granted a period to make representations subsequent to disclosure.
Vsem zadevnim strankam je bil dan tudi rok za predložitev stališč.
In order to ensure equal treatment between any new exporters and the cooperating companies not included in the sample, mentioned in the Annex to this Regulation, it is considered that provision should be made for the weighted average duty imposed on the latter companies to be applied to any new exporters which would otherwise be entitled to a review pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotovitev enakega obravnavanja katerih koli novih izvoznikov in sodelujočih družb, ki niso vključene v vzorec, navedenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi, velja, da je treba sprejeti določbe za tehtano povprečje dajatve, uvedene za prej omenjene družbe, ki se morajo uporabiti za katerega koli novega izvoznika, ki bi bil drugače upravičen do pregleda v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
One Pakistani exporting producer submitted an offer for a price undertaking.
Eden pakistanski proizvajalec izvoznik je predložil ponudbo za cenovno zavezo.
However, bedlinen is characterised by hundreds of different product types, with some characteristics not easily discernible upon importation.
Vendar pa so posteljno perilo značilne številne različne vrste izdelkov, nekatere lastnosti pa se pri uvozu težko prepoznajo.
This makes it virtually impossible to establish meaningful minimum import price for each product type, which could be properly monitored by the Commission and controlled by the customs authorities of the Member States.
Zaradi tega je praktično nemogoče določiti smiselno minimalno uvozno ceno za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki bi jo lahko Komisija ustrezno spremljala, carinski organi držav članic pa nadzorovali.
Under these circumstances, it was considered that a price undertaking was impracticable and could not be accepted.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo ugotovljeno, da je cenovna zaveza neuporabna in ne more biti sprejeta.
The review carried out does not affect the date on which the definitive Regulation will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation,
Ta pregled ne vpliva na čas prenehanja veljavnosti končne uredbe v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe –
Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 397/2004 se spremeni kakor sledi:
Article 1(2) shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(2) nadomesti z naslednjim:
The rate of the definitive antidumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of products manufactured by the following companies shall be:
Stopnja dokončne protidampinške dajatve, pred plačilom dajatve, za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti za izdelke, ki jih izdelujejo naslednje družbe, je:
Manufacturer
Izdelovalec
Karachi
Karači
Manufacturers listed in the Annex
Proizvajalci, našteti v Prilogi
the text of the Annex to this Regulation shall replace the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 397/2004;
Besedilo iz Priloge k tej uredbi postane Priloga Uredbe (ES) št. 397/2004.
the following paragraph shall be added to Article 1:
Členu 1 se doda naslednji odstavek 4:
Where any new exporting producer provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that:
Če novi proizvajalec izvoznik predloži Komisiji zadostne dokaze, da:
it did not export to the Community the product described in paragraph 1 in the period between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004,
v obdobju od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 v Skupnost ni izvažal izdelka iz odstavka 1,
it is not related to any of the exporters or producers subject to the measures imposed by this Regulation and
ni povezan s katerim koli izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem, za katerega veljajo ukrepi, uvedeni s to uredbo in
the Council, acting by simple majority on a proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee, may amend paragraph 2 by adding the new exporting producer to the companies subject to the weighted average duty rate of 5,8 %.’
lahko Svet z navadno večino in na predlog Komisije ter po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom spremeni odstavek 2 tako, da na seznam družb, za katere velja tehtana povprečna stopnja dajatve v višini 5,8 %, doda novega proizvajalca izvoznika.“
OJ L 66, 4.3.2004, p. 1.
UL L 66, 4.3.2004, str. 1.
OJ C 196, 3.8.2004, p. 2.
UL C 196, 3.8.2004, str. 2.
List of the cooperating manufacturers referred to in Article 1(2) under TARIC additional code A706:
Seznam sodelujočih izdelovalcev iz člena 1(2) pod dodatno oznako TARIC A706:
LA 7/1-7, Block 22 F.B. Area,
LA 7/1-7, Block 22 F.B Area,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 696/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 696/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 May 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 6. maja 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 5 May 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 5. maja 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 697/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 697/2006
On the basis of most recent communications by Belgium and Luxembourg, pursuant to Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2771/1999, the Commission has observed that butter market prices have been below 92 % of the intervention price for two consecutive weeks.
Na podlagi zadnjih sporočil Belgije in Luksemburga v skladu s členom 8 Uredbe (ES) št. 2771/1999 ugotovila, da so bile dva zaporedna tedna tržne cene masla nižje od 92 % intervencijske cene.
Intervention buying-in should therefore be opened in those Member States.
Zato je treba v Belgiji in Luksemburgu uvesti intervencijski odkup.
Belgium and Luxembourg should therefore be added to the list established in Regulation (EC) No 343/2006.
Belgijo in Luksemburg je treba zato vključiti na seznam v Uredbi (ES) št. 343/2006.
Belgium
Belgiji
Luxembourg
Luksemburgu
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 663/2006 (OJ L 116, 29.4.2006, p. 39).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 663/2006 (UL L 116, 29.4.2006, str. 39).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 698/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 698/2006
implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 as regards quality evaluation of structural statistics on labour costs and earnings
o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 530/1999 v zvezi z vrednotenjem kakovosti strukturne statistike stroškov dela in plač
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 of 9 March 1999 concerning structural statistics on earnings and labour costs [1], and in particular Article 11(iv) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 530/1999 z dne 9. marca 1999 o strukturni statistiki plač in stroškov dela [1], ter zlasti točke (iv) člena 11 Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 was implemented by Commission Regulations (EC) No 452/2000 [2] and (EC) No 72/2002 [3] which define the content and evaluation criteria of the report on quality to be forwarded to the Commission (Eurostat) after each reference period.
Izvedbeni ukrepi za Uredbo (ES) št. 530/1999 so bili sprejeti z uredbama Komisije (ES) št. 452/2000 [2] in (ES) št. 72/2002 [3], ki opredeljujeta vsebine in merila vrednotenja za poročilo o kakovosti, ki ga je treba Komisiji (Eurostatu) predložiti po vsakem referenčnem obdobju.
The information supplied in the quality report must refer to certain variables.
Informacije v poročilu o kakovosti se morajo nanašati na določene spremenljivke.
Those variables are defined in Commission Regulations (EC) No 1726/1999 [4] and (EC) No 1916/2000 [5].
Navedene spremenljivke so opredeljene v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1726/1999 [4] in Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1916/2000 [5].
Changes in the quality evaluation measures of structural statistics on earnings and labour costs are necessary as a result of the amendments made to Regulations (EC) No 1726/1999 and (EC) No 1916/2000 by Regulations (EC) No 1737/2005 and (EC) No 1738/2005 respectively.
Spremembe ukrepov vrednotenja kakovosti strukturne statistike plač in stroškov dela so nujna posledica sprememb uredb (ES) št. 1726/1999 in (ES) št. 1916/2000 z uredbama (ES) št. 1737/2005 oziroma (ES) št. 1738/2005.
For the sake of clarity, and in order to reduce the burden for the national statistical offices, it is also necessary to harmonise the quality evaluation of statistics on labour costs and earnings.
Usklajeno vrednotenje statistik stroškov dela in plač je potrebno tudi zaradi jasnosti in zmanjšanja obremenitve nacionalnih statističnih uradov.
Regulations (EC) No 452/2000 and (EC) No 72/2002 should therefore be replaced by this Regulation.
Uredbi (ES) št. 452/2000 in (ES) št. 72/2002 je zato treba nadomestiti s to uredbo.