natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to secure effective implementation of the free movement of services and to ensure that recipients and providers can benefit from and supply services throughout the Community regardless of borders, it is necessary to clarify the extent to which requirements of the Member State where the service is provided can be imposed.
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega izvajanja prostega pretoka storitev in za zagotavljanje, da lahko prejemniki in ponudniki uporabljajo in opravljajo storitve v vsej Skupnosti, ne glede na meje, je treba podrobneje razjasniti, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko uveljavijo zahteve države članice, kjer se opravlja storitev.
It is indispensable to provide that the provision on the freedom to provide services does not prevent the Member State where the service is provided from imposing, in compliance with the principles set out in Article 16(1)(a) to (c), its specific requirements for reasons of public policy or public security or for the protection of public health or the environment.
Nujno je treba zagotoviti, da določba o svobodi opravljanja storitev državi članici, v kateri se opravlja storitev, v skladu z načeli iz člena 16(1)(a) do (c) ne preprečuje uveljavljanja posebnih zahtev zaradi ohranjanja javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that Member States retain the right to take measures in order to prevent providers from abusively taking advantage of the internal market principles.
Na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča država članica ohrani pravico do sprejetja ukrepov, s katerimi bi ponudnikom preprečila zlorabo načel notranjega trga.
Abuse by a provider should be established on a case by case basis.
Zlorabo s strani ponudnika bi bilo treba dokazati za vsak primer posebej.
It is necessary to ensure that providers are able to take equipment which is integral to the provision of their service with them when they travel to provide services in another Member State.
Ponudnikom je treba zagotoviti, da lahko v primeru, ko zaradi opravljanja storitev potujejo v drugo državo članico, opremo, ki je bistvena za njihovo storitev, vzamejo s seboj.
In particular, it is important to avoid cases in which the service could not be provided without the equipment or situations in which providers incur additional costs, for example, by hiring or purchasing different equipment to that which they habitually use or by needing to deviate significantly from the way they habitually carry out their activity.
Predvsem je treba preprečiti primere, ko storitve ne bi bilo mogoče opravljati zaradi pomanjkanja opreme, in razmere, v katerih bi ponudniki utrpeli dodatne stroške – če na primer najamejo ali kupijo drugačno opremo od tiste, ki jo običajno uporabljajo, ali če morajo bistveno spremeniti način, na katerega običajno izvajajo svoje dejavnosti.
The concept of equipment does not refer to physical objects which are either supplied by the provider to the client or become part of a physical object as a result of the service activity, such as building materials or spare parts, or which are consumed or left in situ in the course of the service provision, such as combustible fuels, explosives, fireworks, pesticides, poisons or medicines.
Pojem opreme ne sme vključevati fizičnih predmetov, ki jih ponudnik priskrbi stranki, ki postanejo sestavni del fizičnega predmeta kot rezultat storitvene dejavnosti, na primer gradbeni material ali nadomestni deli, ali ki se med opravljanjem storitve uporabijo ali pustijo na mestu samem, na primer vnetljiva goriva, razstreliva, izdelki za ognjemete, pesticidi, strupi ali zdravila.
The provisions of this Directive should not preclude the application by a Member State of rules on employment conditions.
Določbe te direktive ne bi smeli preprečiti državam članicam uporabe predpisov o pogojih zaposlovanja.
Rules laid down by law, regulation or administrative provisions should, in accordance with the Treaty, be justified for reasons relating to the protection of workers and be non-discriminatory, necessary, and proportionate, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, and comply with other relevant Community law.
V skladu s Pogodbo bi morali biti predpisi, določeni v zakonih ali upravnih predpisih, utemeljeni z razlogi, ki se nanašajo na varstvo delavcev, nediskriminatorni, potrebni in sorazmerni, kot to razlaga Sodišče, ter v skladu z drugo ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
It is necessary to ensure that the provision on the freedom to provide services may be departed from only in the areas covered by derogations.
Treba je zagotoviti, da se od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev lahko odstopa samo na področjih, za katera veljajo odstopanja.
Those derogations are necessary in order to take into account the level of integration of the internal market or certain Community instruments relating to services pursuant to which a provider is subject to the application of a law other than that of the Member State of establishment.
Ta odstopanja so potrebna, da bi lahko upoštevali raven povezovanja notranjega trga ali določene instrumente Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na storitve in na podlagi katerih za ponudnika velja zakonodaja, ki ni zakonodaja države članice ustanovitve.
Moreover, by way of exception, measures against a given provider should also be adopted in certain individual cases and under certain strict procedural and substantive conditions.
Poleg tega bi morali biti v določenih posameznih primerih in pod določenimi strogimi postopkovnimi in vsebinskimi pogoji izjemoma sprejeti tudi ukrepi proti določenemu ponudniku.
In addition, any restriction of the free movement of services should be permitted, by way of exception, only if it is consistent with fundamental rights which form an integral part of the general principles of law enshrined in the Community legal order.
Poleg tega bi kakršno koli omejevanje prostega pretoka storitev moralo biti dovoljeno izjemoma in le če je v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami, ki tvorijo sestavni del splošnih načel prava, vsebovanega v pravnem redu Skupnosti.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services concerning postal services should cover both activities reserved to the universal service provider and other postal services.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev, ki zadeva poštne storitve, bi moralo zajemati tako dejavnosti, pridržane za ponudnika univerzalne storitve, kot tudi druge poštne storitve.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services relating to the judicial recovery of debts and the reference to a possible future harmonisation instrument should concern only the access to and the exercise of activities which consist, notably, in bringing actions before a court relating to the recovery of debts.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev, ki se nanaša na sodne izterjave dolgov in sklic na morebitni prihodnji instrument za usklajevanje, bi moral zadevati samo začetek opravljanja in opravljanje dejavnosti, katerih naloga je predvsem vložitev tožb v zvezi z izterjavo dolgov pri sodišču.
This Directive should not affect terms and conditions of employment which, pursuant to Directive 96/71/ECof the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services [19], apply to workers posted to provide a service in the territory of another Member State.
Ta direktiva ne sme posegati v pogoje zaposlovanja, ki v skladu z Direktivo 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev [19] veljajo za delavce, napotene na ozemlje druge države članice zaradi opravljanja storitve.
In such cases, Directive 96/71/EC stipulates that providers have to comply with terms and conditions of employment in a listed number of areas applicable in the Member State where the service is provided.
V takšnih primerih Direktiva 96/71/ES določa, da morajo ponudniki na naštetem številu področij upoštevati pogoje zaposlovanja, ki se uporabljajo v državi članici, kjer se opravlja storitev.
These are: maximum work periods and minimum rest periods, minimum paid annual holidays, minimum rates of pay, including overtime rates, the conditions of hiring out of workers, in particular the protection of workers hired out by temporary employment undertakings, health, safety and hygiene at work, protective measures with regard to the terms and conditions of employment of pregnant women or women who have recently given birth and of children and young people and equality of treatment between men and women and other provisions on non-discrimination.
To so: maksimalno število delovnih ur in minimalni čas počitka, minimalni plačani dopust, najnižja plača, vključno s plačilom nadur, pogoji v zvezi z najemanjem delavcev, zlasti v zvezi z varstvom delavcev, ki se najamejo pri podjetjih za začasno zaposlovanje, zdravstveni, varnostni in higienski standardi na delovnem mestu, zaščitni ukrepi glede pogojev za zaposlovanje nosečnic ali žensk, ki so pred kratkim rodile, otrok in mladih, enakovredna obravnava moških in žensk ter druge določbe o nediskriminaciji.
This not only concerns terms and conditions of employment which are laid down by law but also those laid down in collective agreements or arbitration awards that are officially declared or de facto universally applicable within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC.
To ne zadeva le pogojev zaposlovanja, ki jih določa zakonodaja, ampak tudi tiste iz kolektivnih pogodb ali arbitražnih odločb, ki so uradno razglašene ali dejansko splošno veljavne v smislu Direktive 96/71/ES.
Moreover, this Directive should not prevent Member States from applying terms and conditions of employment on matters other than those listed in Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC on the grounds of public policy.
Poleg tega ta direktiva državam članicam ne sme preprečevati uporabe pogojev zaposlovanja v drugih zadevah, ki niso navedene v členu 3(1) Direktive 96/71/ES, iz razlogov javnega reda.
Neither should this Directive affect terms and conditions of employment in cases where the worker employed for the provision of a cross-border service is recruited in the Member State where the service is provided.
Ta direktiva tudi ne bi smela vplivati na pogoje zaposlovanja v primerih, ko se delavca, zaposlenega za opravljanje čezmejne storitve, najame v državi članici, kjer se opravlja storitev.
Furthermore, this Directive should not affect the right for the Member State where the service is provided to determine the existence of an employment relationship and the distinction between self-employed persons and employed persons, including ‘false self-employed persons’.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na pravico države članice, v kateri se opravlja storitev, da opredeli delovno razmerje ter razlikovanje med samozaposlenimi osebami in zaposlenimi osebami, vključno z „lažnimi samozaposlenimi osebami“.
The provision on the freedom to provide services should not apply in cases where, in conformity with Community law, an activity is reserved in a Member State to a particular profession, for example requirements which reserve the provision of legal advice to lawyers.
Določba o svobodi opravljanja storitev se ne bi smela uporabljati v primerih, ko je v državi članici v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti dejavnost pridržana za določen poklic, kot je to v primeru zahtev, da je pravno svetovanje pridržano za pravnike.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services concerning matters relating to the registration of vehicles leased in a Member State other than that in which they are used follows from the case law of the Court of Justice, which has recognised that a Member State may impose such an obligation, in accordance with proportionate conditions, in the case of vehicles used on its territory.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev za zadeve, ki so v zvezi z registracijo vozil, zakupljenih v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri se uporabljajo, izhaja iz sodne prakse Sodišča, ki je potrdilo, da lahko država članica v skladu s sorazmernimi pogoji predpiše takšno obveznost za vozila, ki se uporabljajo na njenem ozemlju.
That exclusion does not cover occasional or temporary rental.
Ta izključitev ne velja za občasno ali začasno izposojo.
Contractual relations between the provider and the client as well as between an employer and employee should not be subject to this Directive.
Pogodbeni odnosi med ponudnikom storitev in stranko kot tudi med delodajalcem in delojemalcem ne bi smeli biti predmet te direktive.
The applicable law regarding the contractual or non contractual obligations of the provider should be determined by the rules of private international law.
Veljavni pravni red za pogodbene ali nepogodbene obveznosti ponudnika storitev bi morali določati predpisi mednarodnega zasebnega prava.
It is necessary to afford Member States the possibility, exceptionally and on a case-by-case basis, of taking measures which derogate from the provision on the freedom to provide services in respect of a provider established in another Member State on grounds of the safety of services.
Državam članicam je treba izjemoma in za vsak posamezen primer posebej omogočiti, da glede ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici sprejmejo ukrepe, ki zaradi varnosti storitev odstopajo od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev.
However, it should be possible to take such measures only in the absence of harmonisation at Community level.
Vendar pa bi bilo mogoče takšne ukrepe sprejeti le, če ni usklajevanja na ravni Skupnosti.
Restrictions on the free movement of services, contrary to this Directive, may arise not only from measures applied to providers, but also from the many barriers to the use of services by recipients, especially consumers.
Do omejitev prostega pretoka storitev v nasprotju s to direktivo ne pride le zaradi ukrepov, ki veljajo za ponudnike, ampak tudi zaradi številnih ovir, s katerimi se prejemniki, zlasti potrošniki, srečujejo pri uporabi storitev.
This Directive mentions, by way of illustration, certain types of restriction applied to a recipient wishing to use a service performed by a provider established in another Member State.
Ta direktiva nazorno navaja določene vrste omejitev, veljavnih za prejemnike, ki želijo uporabljati storitev ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici.
This also includes cases where recipients of a service are under an obligation to obtain authorisation from or to make a declaration to their competent authorities in order to receive a service from a provider established in another Member State.
To vključuje tudi primere, ko morajo prejemniki storitev pridobiti dovoljenje pri njihovih pristojnih organih ali jim podati izjavo, da bi lahko prejemali storitev ponudnika, ki ima sedež v drugi državi članici.
This does not concern general authorisation schemes which also apply to the use of a service supplied by a provider established in the same Member State.
To ne zadeva splošnih sistemov dovoljenj, ki jih je tudi treba upoštevati pri uporabi storitve ponudnika, ki ima sedež v isti državi članici.
The concept of financial assistance provided for the use of a particular service should not apply to systems of aids granted by Member States, in particular in the social field or in the cultural sector, which are covered by Community rules on competition, nor to general financial assistance not linked to the use of a particular service, for example grants or loans to students.
Koncept finančne pomoči, namenjene uporabi določene storitve, se ne bi smel uporabljati za sisteme pomoči, ki jih dodelijo države članice, zlasti na socialnem področju ali v kulturnem sektorju, ki sta zajeta v predpisih Skupnosti o konkurenci, ali za splošno finančno pomoč, ki ni povezana z uporabo določene storitve, na primer za štipendije ali študentska posojila.
In accordance with the Treaty rules on the free movement of services, discrimination on grounds of the nationality of the recipient or national or local residence is prohibited.
V skladu z določbami Pogodbe o prostem pretoku storitev je prepovedana diskriminacija na podlagi državljanstva prejemnika ali njegovega nacionalnega ali lokalnega bivališča.
Such discrimination could take the form of an obligation, imposed only on nationals of another Member State, to supply original documents, certified copies, a certificate of nationality or official translations of documents in order to benefit from a service or from more advantageous terms or prices.
Taka diskriminacija je lahko na primer obveznost, naložena samo državljanom drugih držav članic, da predložijo izvirne dokumente, overjene kopije, potrdila o državljanstvu ali uradne prevode dokumentov, da bi lahko izkoristili ugodnosti storitev oziroma ugodnejše pogoje ali cene.
However, the prohibition of discriminatory requirements should not preclude the reservation of advantages, especially as regards tariffs, to certain recipients, if such reservation is based on legitimate and objective criteria.
Vendar prepoved diskriminacijskih zahtev ne bi smela izključevati omejevanja ugodnosti na nekatere prejemnike, še posebej glede tarif, če to omejevanje temelji na zakonitih in objektivnih merilih.
The principle of non-discrimination within the internal market means that access by a recipient, and especially by a consumer, to a service on offer to the public may not be denied or restricted by application of a criterion, included in general conditions made available to the public, relating to the recipient's nationality or place of residence.
Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije na notranjem trgu pomeni, da v splošnih pogojih, ki so dostopni javnosti, ne sme biti merila, ki bi na osnovi državljanstva ali bivališča prejemniku in še zlasti potrošniku preprečevalo dostop do storitve, ki je dostopna javnosti, ali bi ga pri tem oviralo.
It does not follow that it will be unlawful discrimination if provision were made in such general conditions for different tariffs and conditions to apply to the provision of a service, where those tariffs, prices and conditions are justified for objective reasons that can vary from country to country, such as additional costs incurred because of the distance involved or the technical characteristics of the provision of the service, or different market conditions, such as higher or lower demand influenced by seasonality, different vacation periods in the Member States and pricing by different competitors, or extra risks linked to rules differing from those of the Member State of establishment.
Kljub temu pa so v splošnih pogojih lahko določene različne tarife in pogoji za opravljanje storitev, kadar so te tarife, cene in pogoji neposredno utemeljeni z objektivnimi razlogi, ki so lahko od države do države različni, kot so dodatni stroški, nastali zaradi razdalje ali tehničnih značilnosti opravljanja storitve, različnih tržnih pogojev, kot so večje ali manjše povpraševanje, na katero vplivajo sezona, različen čas počitnic v državah članicah in cene različnih konkurentov, ali z dodatnimi tveganji v zvezi s predpisi, ki se razlikujejo od predpisov države članice ustanovitve.
Neither does it follow that the non-provision of a service to a consumer for lack of the required intellectual property rights in a particular territory would constitute unlawful discrimination.
To tudi ne pomeni, da bi v primeru, če ponudnik ne opravi storitve za prejemnika, ker nima pravice do intelektualne lastnine na določenem ozemlju, to predstavljalo nezakonito diskriminacijo.
It is appropriate to provide that, as one of the means by which the provider may make the information which he is obliged to supply easily accessible to the recipient, he supply his electronic address, including that of his website.
Primerno bi bilo zagotoviti, da ponudnik prejemniku predloži svoj elektronski naslov, vključno z naslovom spletne strani, saj je to eden od načinov, kako olajšati dostop do informacij, ki jih je ponudnik dolžan posredovati.
Furthermore, the obligation to make available certain information in the provider's information documents which present his services in detail should not cover commercial communications of a general nature, such as advertising, but rather documents giving a detailed description of the services proposed, including documents on a website.
Poleg tega obveznost, da ponudnik da na voljo določene informacije v informativnem gradivu, v katerem podrobno predstavlja svoje storitve, ne sme zajemati splošnih poslovnih komunikacij, kot so oglasi, ampak dokumente, ki podrobno opisujejo predlagane storitve, vključno z dokumenti na spletni strani.
It is necessary to provide in this Directive for certain rules on high quality of services, ensuring in particular information and transparency requirements.
V tej direktivi je treba zagotoviti nekatere določbe, ki bodo zagotavljale visoko kakovost storitev in zlasti zahteve v zvezi z informacijami in preglednostjo.
These rules should apply both in cases of cross border provision of services between Member States and in cases of services provided in a Member State by a provider established there, without imposing unnecessary burdens on SMEs.
Te določbe bi se morale uporabljati v primerih čezmejnega opravljanja storitev med državami članicami in v primerih storitev, ki jih v državi članici opravlja ponudnik s sedežem v tej državi članici, pri čemer njihova uporaba naj ne bi predstavljala nepotrebnih obremenitev za MSP.
They should not in any way prevent Member States from applying, in conformity with this Directive and other Community law, additional or different quality requirements.
V nobenem primeru pa ta pravila ne bi smela preprečevati državam članicam, da v skladu s to uredbo in drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti ne bi uporabljale dodatnih ali različnih zahtev za kakovost.
Any operator providing services involving a direct and particular health, safety or financial risk for the recipient or a third person should, in principle, be covered by appropriate professional liability insurance, or by another form of guarantee which is equivalent or comparable, which means, in particular, that such an operator should as a general rule have adequate insurance cover for services provided in one or more Member States other than the Member State of establishment.
Vsak izvajalec, ki opravlja storitve, pri katerih je prisotno za prejemnika ali tretjo osebo neposredno in posebno tveganje za zdravje, varnost ali finančno tveganje, mora načeloma imeti ustrezno zavarovanje poklicne odgovornosti ali drugo obliko jamstva, ki je enakovredna ali primerljiva, kar še posebej pomeni, da bi moral takšen izvajalec praviloma imeti ustrezno zavarovalno kritje za opravljanje storitev v eni ali več državah članicah, ki niso države članice ustanovitve.
The insurance or guarantee should be appropriate to the nature and extent of the risk.
Zavarovanje ali jamstvo bi moralo ustrezati naravi in obsegu tveganja.
Therefore it should be necessary for the provider to have cross-border cover only if that provider actually provides services in other Member States.
Zato morajo ponudniki imeti čezmejno kritje storitev le, če dejansko opravljajo storitve v drugih državah članicah.
Member States should not lay down more detailed rules concerning the insurance cover and fix for example minimum thresholds for the insured sum or limits on exclusions from the insurance cover.
Države članice ne bi smele določiti podrobnosti zavarovalnega kritja niti na primer minimalnih pragov za zavarovalne vsote ali omejitev glede izvzetja iz zavarovalnega kritja.
Providers and insurance companies should maintain the necessary flexibility to negotiate insurance policies precisely targeted to the nature and extent of the risk.
Ponudniki in zavarovalnice bi morali ohraniti potrebno prilagodljivost pri dogovarjanju o zavarovalnih policah, natančno prilagojenih naravi in obsegu tveganja.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for an obligation of appropriate insurance to be laid down by law.
Poleg tega obveznosti glede ustreznega zavarovanja ni treba določiti z zakonom.
It should be sufficient if an insurance obligation is part of the ethical rules laid down by professional bodies.
Zadoščati bi moralo, da je obveznost glede zavarovanja del etičnih pravil, ki jih določijo poklicna telesa.