natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances with respect to the original investigation regarding dumping could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je bilo tudi preučeno, ali se za spremenjene okoliščine glede na prvotno preiskavo o dampingu lahko utemeljeno šteje, da so trajne narave.
For those companies which exported during the IP and cooperated with the investigation, the current review showed that their dumping margin either remained at, or had fallen to, a de minimis level.
Za podjetja, ki so med OP izvažala in ki so hkrati sodelovala v preiskavi, je ta pregled pokazal, da je njihova stopnja dampinga ostala ali padla na de minimis stopnji.
The main reason for this was that whilst the normal values and domestic sales prices for these companies had risen as compared to the data from the original investigation, sales prices on the Community market had risen by a greater margin.
Glavni razlog za to je bil, da so se, medtem ko so se normalne vrednosti in domače prodajne cene za ta podjetja v primerjavi s podatki iz prvotne preiskave dvignile, prodajne cene na trgu Skupnosti dvignile za večjo stopnjo.
Indeed, it was found that export prices to the Community were on average 53 % higher during the IP of this investigation when compared with the export prices found during the IP of the original investigation.
V resnici je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile izvozne cene v Skupnosti v obdobju te preiskave v primerjavi z izvoznimi cenami v obdobju prvotne preiskave povprečno za 53 % višje.
No indications were found, suggesting that these changes would not be of a lasting nature.
Nobenih dokazov ni bilo o tem, da te spremembe ne bi bile trajne narave.
It should also be noted that these companies had a high capacity utilisation, in excess of 80 %, during the IP.
Povedati je treba tudi, da je bila v teh podjetjih izkoriščenost zmogljivosti visoka, več kot 80 % med OP.
Additionally these companies do not have any plans to increase existing capacity, thereby restricting the scope for any future changes in circumstances.
Poleg tega ta podjetja ne načrtujejo povečanja obstoječe zmogljivosti in s tem omejujejo možnosti za kakršne koli prihodnje spremembe okoliščin.
It is therefore considered that this situation as far as export price and volume is concerned is not likely to change.
Zato se šteje, da se ta položaj vsaj glede izvozne cene in obsega verjetno ne bo spremenil.
One company which did not export to the Community during the original investigation cooperated and exported the product concerned to the Community during this investigation.
Eno podjetje, ki med prvotno preiskavo ni izvažalo v Skupnost, je sodelovalo in izvažalo zadevni izdelek v Skupnost med to preiskavo.
The dumping margin for this company was also found to be de minimis.
Stopnja dampinga za to podjetje je bila prav tako de minimis.
The normal value, as well as domestic and export prices of this company were found to be in the same range as those for the other two cooperating exporters.
Normalna vrednost, pa tudi domače in izvozne cene podjetja so bile v enakem razponu kot normalna vrednost in cene drugih dveh sodelujočih izvoznikov.
For the two cooperating exporting producers that did not export to the Community during the IP, no evidence to justify a change in their duty was found as outlined in recital (34).
Pri dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcih-izvoznikih, ki med OP nista izvažala v Skupnost, niso bili odkriti nikakršni dokazi, ki bi upravičevali spremembo dajatev, tako kot je to opisano v uvodni izjavi (34).
It should also be recalled that there was a wide range of dumping margins found in the original investigation (1,4 % to 55,8 %), which indicates that considerable differences in the dumping behaviour of Korean companies existed.
Treba je opozoriti, da je prvotna preiskava pokazala širok razpon stopenj dampinga (od 1,4 % do 55,8 %), kar pomeni, da so obstajale precejšne razlike v dampinškem obnašanju korejskih podjetij.
For these reasons, it cannot be concluded that the findings of de minimis dumping margins for the producers which exported to the Community during the IP are representative for those exporters which did not.
Iz teh razlogov ne moremo zaključiti, da so de minimis stopnje dampinga za proizvajalce, ki so med OP izvažali v Skupnost, reprezentativne tudi za tiste izvoznike, ki tega niso delali.
Accordingly, for these companies, there is no evidence to suggest that a revision of their current anti-dumping duties is warranted, nor is there any data available that would allow a revised individual margin to be calculated for them.
Pri teh podjetjih, skladno s tem, ni nobenih dokazov, ki bi kazali, da je pregled trenutnih protidampinških dajatev utemeljen, prav tako niso na voljo podatki, ki bi omogočali, da se zanje izračuna pregledana individualna stopnja.
These findings were disclosed to the parties concerned, none of which made any comments nor provided any additional information.
Te ugotovitve so bile sporočene zadevnim strankam, od katerih nobena ni podala pripomb niti ni posredovala dodatnih informacij.
Three of the four companies in Taiwan, currently subject to an individual duty, cooperated in the current investigation.
Tri od štirih podjetij v Tajvanu, za katere trenutno velja individualna dajatev, so sodelovala v trenutni raziskavi.
For one of these companies, the current investigation showed that its dumping margin had fallen to a de minimis level.
Pri enem od teh podjetij je trenutna preiskava pokazala, da se je njegova stopnja dampinga znižala na de minimis stopnjo.
For the second company the dumping margin fell from 7,8 % in the original investigation to 4,6 % in the current investigation.
Pri drugem podjetju se je stopnja dampinga znižala s 7,8 % v prvotni preiskavi na 4,6 % v trenutni preiskavi.
In line with the situation in the Republic of Korea, the main reason for this was that whilst the normal values and domestic sales prices for these companies had risen when compared with data from the original investigation, sales prices to the Community market had risen by a greater margin.
V skladu s položajem Republike Koreje je bil glavni razlog za to, da so se, medtem ko so se normalne vrednosti in domače prodajne cene za ta podjetja v primerjavi s podatki iz prvotne preiskave dvignile, prodajne cene na trgu v Skupnosti dvignile za večjo stopnjo.
For Taiwan, it was found that export prices to the Community were on average 42 % higher during the IP of this investigation when compared with the export prices found during the IP of the original investigation.
Za Tajvan je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile izvozne cene v Skupnosti v obdobju te preiskave v primerjavi z izvoznimi cenami v obdobju prvotne raziskave povprečno za 42 % višje.
It was also found for these companies that their capacity utilisation was similar to that found for the companies in Korea.
Za ta podjetja je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da je bila izkoriščenost zmogljivosti pri njih podobna tisti, ki je bila ugotovljena pri podjetjih v Koreji.
Nor did they have any plans to increase their installed capacity.
Prav tako ta podjetja niso načrtovala povečanja svoje obstoječe zmogljivosti.
The third cooperating company, currently subject to an individual duty, provided evidence that it did not export the product concerned to the Community during the IP of this investigation.
Tretje sodelujoče podjetje, za katerega trenutno velja individualna dajatev, je predložilo dokaze, da v obdobju te preiskave zadevnega izdelka ni izvažalo v EU.
In addition, one company in Taiwan which did not export to the Community during the original investigation also cooperated during this investigation.
Poleg tega je eno tajvansko podjetje, ki med prvotno preiskavo ni izvažalo v Skupnost, prav tako sodelovalo v tej preiskavi.
The dumping margin for this company is 10,7 %.
Stopnja dampinga za to podjetje je 10,7 %.
For the three cooperating producers which exported to the Community during the IP of the current investigation, there are no reasons to believe that the nature of the changes between the current and the original investigations, particularly the increase in export prices to the Community, are not lasting in nature.
Pri treh sodelujočih proizvajalcih, ki so v obdobju te preiskave izvažali v Skupnost, ni nobenega razloga za domnevo, da narava sprememb med trenutno in prvotno preiskavo, zlasti pa porast izvoznih cen v Skupnosti, ni trajne narave.
Accordingly, it is considered that the dumping margins for these companies, calculated on the basis of the data provided in this investigation are reliable.
V skladu s tem se šteje, da so stopnje dampinga za ta podjetja, izračunane na osnovi podatkov, pridobljenih s to preiskavo, zanesljive.
For the producer which cooperated but which did not export to the Community during the IP of the current investigation, there is no evidence to suggest that a revision of its current anti-dumping duties is warranted.
Za proizvajalca, ki je sodeloval, a v obdobju te preiskave ni izvažal v Skupnost, ni nobenih dokazov, ki bi kazali, da je pregled njegovih trenutnih protidampinških dajatev utemeljen.
It is, therefore considered appropriate to leave its current margin unchanged.
Zato velja, da je primerno, da trenutna stopnja ostane nespremenjena.
As with the situation for Korea, there are no data available that would allow a revised individual margin to be calculated for this company.
Glede položaja v Koreji ni na voljo podatkov, ki bi dovoljevali, da se za to podjetje izračuna pregledana individualna stopnja.
Again, following disclosure, the party concerned made no comments nor provided any additional information.
Poleg tega zadevne stranke na ugotovitve niso dale pripomb niti niso posredovale dodatnih informacij.
PROPOSAL FOR ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
PREDLOG ZA PROTIDAMPINŠKE UKREPE
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping and the lasting nature of changed circumstances, the present anti-dumping measures against imports of the product concerned originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan should be amended to reflect the new dumping margins found.
Ob upoštevanju zaključkov glede dampinga in trajne narave spremenjenih okoliščin morajo biti trenutni protidampinški ukrepi glede uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in Tajvana spremenjeni tako, da odražajo nove ugotovitve o stopnjah dampinga.
The fact that PET prices can fluctuate in line with fluctuations in crude oil prices, should not entail a higher duty.
Dejstvo, da cene PET-a lahko nihajo vzporedno z nihanjem cen surove nafte, ne sme povzročiti višjih dajatev.
It was therefore considered appropriate that the amended duties should be expressed in the form of a specific amount per tonne.
Zato se je štelo za primerno, da se spremenjene dajatve izrazijo v obliki določenega zneska na tono.
This approach was followed in the original investigation.
Temu pristopu je sledila tudi prvotna preiskava.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates were established on the basis of the findings of the present review.
Stopnje protidampinških dajatev za posamezna podjetja so bile določene na osnovi ugotovitev tega pregleda.
They, therefore, reflect the situation found during this review with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo situacijo teh podjetij, ki je bila ugotovljena s tem pregledom.
These duty rates, as opposed to the duty applicable to ‘all other companies’, are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation.
Te stopnje dajatev se zato v nasprotju z dajatvami za „vsa druga podjetja“ uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevne države in za izdelke, ki jih proizvedejo podjetja, ki so posebej omenjena v normativnem delu te uredbe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of the Regulation, including by entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and will be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvede katero koli od drugih podjetij, ki niso posebej omenjena v normativnem delu te uredbe, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani s posebej omenjenimi podjetji, ne morejo koristiti teh stopenj, saj zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vsa druga podjetja“.
The proposed anti-dumping duties for those companies which exported to the Community during the IP are as follows:
Predlagane protidampinške dajatve za podjetja, ki so med OP izvažala v Skupnost, so naslednje:
Proposed duty
Predlagana dajatev
In line with the revised residual dumping margin outlined in recital (45), the residual anti-dumping duty for Taiwan should be increased to EUR 143,4/tonne.
V skladu s pregledano preostalo stopnjo dampinga, navedeno v uvodni izjavi (45), se mora preostala protidampinška dajatev za Tajvan zvišati na 143,4 EUR/t.
Interested parties were informed of all the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to propose an amendment to the Regulation in force.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o vseh dejstvih in preudarkih, na osnovi katerih naj bi temeljil predlog za spremembo veljavne uredbe.
No comments were received,
Prejeta ni bila nobena pripomba –
The table in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 shall be replaced by the following table:
Tabela v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000 se nadomesti z naslednjo tabelo:
The table in Article 1(3) shall be replaced by the following table:
Tabela v členu 1(3) se nadomesti z naslednjo tabelo:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 823/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 7).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 823/2004 (UL 127, 29.4.2004, str. 7).
OJ C 120, 22.5.2003, p. 9.
UL C 120, 22.5.2003, str. 9.
OJ L 271, 19.8.2004, p. 1.
UL L 271, 19.8.2004, str. 1.
Far Eastern Textile Ltd, Taipei
Far Eastern Textile Ltd, Tajpej
Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corp., Taipei
Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corp., Tajpej
Council Regulation (EC) No 84/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 84/2005
amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan
o spremembah Priloge k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sistemov televizijskih kamer s poreklom iz Japonske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1], (v nadaljevanju „osnovna uredba“),
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, predloženim po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 [2], imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems (‘TCS’) originating in Japan.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1015/94 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz sistemov televizijskih kamer („STK“) s poreklom iz Japonske.
In Article 1(3)(e) of Regulation No 1015/94, the Council specifically excluded from the scope of the anti-dumping duty camera systems listed in the Annex to that Regulation (‘the Annex’), representing high-end professional camera systems technically falling within the product definition under Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1015/94, but which cannot be regarded as television camera systems.
Svet je v členu 1(3)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 1015/94 iz plačevanja protidampinške dajatve izrecno izključil sisteme kamer iz Priloge k navedeni uredbi (v nadaljevanju „Priloga“), tj. visoko zmogljive sisteme profesionalnih kamer, ki tehnično ustrezajo opredelitvi izdelkov iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1015/94, vendar jih ni mogoče prištevati med sisteme televizijskih kamer.
In October 1995, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2474/95 [3], amended Regulation (EC) No 1015/94, in particular as regards the definition of the like product and certain models of professional camera systems which were explicitly exempted from the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Oktobra 1995 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 2474/95 [3] spremenil Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1015/94, predvsem kar zadeva opredelitev podobnih izdelkov in nekaterih modelov sistemov profesionalnih kamer, ki so bili izrecno izvzeti iz dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
In January 1999 and January 2000, the Council, by Regulations (EC) No 193/1999 [5] and (EC) No 176/2000 [6], amended Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 by adding certain successor models of professional camera systems to the Annex and thus excluding those from the application of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Januarja 1999 in 2000 je Svet z Uredbama (ES) št. 193/1999 [5] in (ES) št. 176/2000 [6] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1015/94, tako da je nekatere naslednike modelov sistemov profesionalnih kamer vključil v Prilogo in jih s tem izključil iz plačevanja dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
In October 2004, the Council, by Regulation (EC) 1754/2004 [7], amended Regulation (EC) No 176/2000.
Oktobra 2004 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) 1754/2004 [7] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 176/2000.
In September 2000, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 [8], confirmed the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1015/94 pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Septembra 2000 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000 [8] potrdil dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1015/94 v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
In January 2001 and in May 2001, the Council, by Regulations (EC) No 198/2001 [9] and (EC) No 951/2001 [10], amended Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 by adding certain successor models of professional camera systems to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 and thus excluding them from the application of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Januarja in maja 2001 je Svet z Uredbama (ES) št. 198/2001 [9] in (ES) št. 951/2001 [10] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000, tako da je v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 vključil nekatere naslednike modelov sistemov profesionalnih kamer in jih s tem izključil iz plačevanja dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
In September 2001, further to an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1900/2001 [11] confirmed the level of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 on imports of TCS from the exporting producer Hitachi Denshi Ltd.
Septembra 2001 je Svet, po vmesnem pregledu, skladno s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe z Uredbo (ES) št. 1900/2001 [11] potrdil stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000 na uvoz sistemov televizijskih kamer proizvajalca izvoznika Hitachi Denshi Ltd.
In September 2002, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1696/2002 [12], amended Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 by adding certain successor models of professional camera systems to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 and thus excluding them from the application of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Septembra 2002 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1696/2002 [12] spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000, tako da je v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 vključil nekatere modele sistemov profesionalnih kamer in jih s tem izključil iz plačevanja dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
In April 2004, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 825/2004, amended Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 by adding certain successor models of professional camera systems to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 and thus excluding them from the application of the definitive anti-dumping duty.
Aprila 2004 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 825/2004 spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 2042/2000, tako da je nekatere naslednike modelov sistemov profesionalnih kamer vključil v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 in jih s tem izključil iz plačevanja dokončne protidampinške dajatve.
INVESTIGATION CONCERNING NEW MODELS OF PROFESSIONAL CAMERA SYSTEMS
PREISKAVA V ZVEZI Z NOVIMI MODELI SISTEMOV PROFESIONALNIH KAMER
Two Japanese exporting producers, namely Sony Corporation (‘Sony’) and Victor Company of Japan Limited (‘JVC’) informed the Commission that they intended to introduce new models of professional camera systems into the Community market and requested the Commission to add these new models of professional camera systems, including their accessories, to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 and thus exempt them from the scope of the anti-dumping duties.
Dva japonska proizvajalca izvoznika, in sicer Sony Corporation (Sony) in Victor Company of Japan Limited (JVC), sta Komisijo obvestila, da nameravata uvesti na trg Skupnosti nove modele sistemov profesionalnih kamer in zahtevala, naj te nove modele sistemov profesionalnih kamer in njihove dodatke vključi v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 ter jih s tem izvzame iz protidampinških dajatev.
The Commission informed the Community industry accordingly and commenced an investigation limited to the determination of whether the products under consideration fall within the scope of the anti-dumping duties and whether the operational part of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 should be amended accordingly.
Komisija je temu ustrezno obvestila industrijo Skupnosti in začela preiskavo omejeno na ugotavljanje, ali zadevni izdelki sodijo na področje protidampinških dajatev in ali je treba temu ustrezno spremeniti operativni del Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2000.
Models under investigation
Modeli, v preiskavi
The requests for exemption were received for the following models of camera systems, supplied with the relevant technical information:
Prejeti zahtevi za izvzetje z dodanimi ustreznimi tehničnimi podatki sta se nanašali na naslednje modele sistemov kamer:
viewfinder HDVF-C30W
iskalo HDVF-C30W
Camera head KY-F560E
Glava kamere KY-F560E
The Sony viewfinder was presented as a model which can only be used with camcorders, cameras that are outside the scope of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000.
Iskalo Sony je bilo predstavljeno kot model, ki se lahko uporablja samo z ročnimi video kamerami, tj. kamerami, ki niso zajete v Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000.
The JVC model was presented as a successor to a professional camera model already excluded from the anti-dumping measure in force.
Model JVC je bil predstavljen kot naslednik modela profesionalne kamere, ki je bil že izključen iz veljavnega protidampinškega ukrepa.
Findings
Ugotovitve
Viewfinder HDVF-C30W
Iskalo HDVF-C30W
It was found that viewfinder HDVF-C30W falls under the product description of Article 1(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000.
Pri iskalu HDVF-C30W je bilo ugotovljeno, da ustreza opisu izdelkov iz člena 1(2)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2000.
However, it can only be used with camera heads that do not fall under the product description of Article 1(2)(a) of that Regulation.
Vendar pa se lahko uporablja samo z glavami kamer, ki ne ustrezajo opisu izdelkov iz člena 1(2)(a) te uredbe.
In particular, the signal-to-noise ratio of these camera heads is 54 dB, whereas the description in Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 for the camera heads requires ‘55 dB or more at normal gain’.
Natančneje, razmerje signal/šum teh glav kamer je 54 dB, medtem ko opis v Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000 za glave kamer zahteva „55 dB ali več pri običajnem ojačenju“.
Therefore, it was concluded that this viewfinder should be regarded as a professional camera system falling within the definition of Article 1(3)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000.
Izkazalo se je, da je treba to iskalo uvrstiti v sistem profesionalnih kamer in da ustreza opredelitvi iz člena 1(3)(e) Uredbe (ES) št. 2042/2000.
As a result, this viewfinder should be excluded from the scope of the existing anti-dumping measures and added to the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000.
Posledično je treba to iskalo izvzeti iz obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov in ga vključiti v Prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 2042/2000.