natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considers that EKA's and Atofina's submissions represented significant added value in accordance with point 21 of the Leniency Notice prior to the first submission by Solvay, which only occurred on 4 April 2003.
Komisija meni, da sta vlogi podjetij EKA in Atofina imeli znatno dodano vrednost v skladu s točko 21 obvestila o prizanesljivosti pred prvo vlogo podjetja Solvay, ki je bila podana šele 4. aprila 2003.
Therefore the Commission rejects Solvay's argument.
Zato Komisija zavrača trditve podjetja Solvay.
Solvay was granted a 10 % reduction of the fine that would otherwise have been imposed on it.
Podjetju Solvay je bilo odobreno 10 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi mu bila sicer naložena.
Other applications under the Leniency Notice
Druge vloge po določilih obvestila o prizanesljivosti
Solvay Solexis and Kemira also filed applications under section B of the Leniency Notice but no reduction was granted, due to lack of significant added value in their applications.
Podjetji Solvay Solexis in Kemira sta prav tako vložili vlogi po določilih oddelka B obvestila o prizanesljivosti, vendar pa jima zaradi pomanjkanja znatne dodane dokazne vrednosti v njunih vlogah ni bilo podeljeno nikakršno zmanjšanje globe.
DECISION
SKLEP
The following undertakings have infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement by participating, for the periods indicated, in a single and continuous infringement regarding hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate, covering the whole EEA territory, which consisted mainly of exchanges between competitors of information on prices and sales volumes, agreements on prices, agreements on reduction of production capacity in the EEA and monitoring of the anti-competitive arrangements:
Naslednja podjetja so kršila člen 81(1) Pogodbe in člen 53 Sporazuma EGP, s tem, ko so v navedenem obdobju sodelovala v enotni in dolgotrajni kršitvi glede vodikovega peroksida in natrijevega perborata, ki je vključevala celotno ozemlje EGP in je v glavnem vključevala izmenjavo informacij med konkurenti o cenah in obsegu prodaje, dogovore o cenah, dogovore o zmanjšanju proizvodnih zmogljivosti v EGP ter nadzor protikonkurenčnih dogovorov:
Akzo Nobel NV, from 25 February 1994 until 31 December 1999;
Akzo Nobel NV, od 25. februarja 1994 do 31. decembra 1999;
Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB, from 31 January 1994 until 31 December 1999;
Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB, od 31. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 1999;
EKA Chemicals AB, from 31 January 1994 until 31 December 1999;
EKA Chemicals AB, od 31. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 1999;
Degussa AG, from 31 January 1994 until 31 December 2000;
Degussa AG, od 31. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 2000;
Edison SpA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 2000;
Edison SpA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 2000;
FMC Corporation, from 29 May 1997 until 13 December 1999;
FMC Corporation, od 29. maja 1997 do 13. decembra 1999;
FMC Foret S.A., from 29 May 1997 until 13 December 1999;
FMC Foret S.A., od 29. maja 1997 do 13. decembra 1999;
Kemira OYJ, from 31 January 1994 until 31 December 2000;
Kemira OYJ, od 31. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 2000;
L'Air Liquide SA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 1997;
L'Air Liquide SA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 1997;
Chemoxal SA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 1997;
Chemoxal SA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 1997;
Snia SpA, from 29 May 1997 until 31 December 1998;
Snia SpA, od 29. maja 1997 do 31. decembra 1998;
Caffaro Srl, from 29 May 1997 until 31 December 1998;
Caffaro Srl, od 29. maja 1997 do 31. decembra 1998;
Solvay SA/NV, from 31 January 1994 until 31 December 2000;
Solvay SA/NV, od 31. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 2000;
Solvay Solexis SpA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 2000;
Solvay Solexis SpA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 2000;
Total SA, from 30 April 2000 until 31 December 2000;
Total SA, od 30. aprila 2000 do 31. decembra 2000;
Elf Aquitaine SA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 2000;
Elf Aquitaine SA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 2000;
Arkema SA, from 12 May 1995 until 31 December 2000.
Arkema SA, od 12. maja 1995 do 31. decembra 2000.
For the infringements referred to in previous recital, the following fines were imposed:
Za kršitve v prejšnji navedbi so bile podjetjem naložene naslednje globe:
Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB and EKA Chemicals AB, jointly and severally: EUR 25,2 million;
Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals Holding AB in EKA Chemicals AB, solidarno: 25,2 milijona EUR;
Edison SpA: EUR 58,125 million, of which EUR 25,619 million jointly and severally with Solvay Solexis SpA;
Edison SpA: 58,125 milijona EUR, od česar 25,619 milijona EUR solidarno s podjetjem Solvay Solexis SpA;
FMC Corporation and FMC Foret S.A., jointly and severally: EUR 25 million;
FMC Corporation in FMC Foret S.A., solidarno: 25 milijonov EUR;
Kemira OYJ: EUR 33 million;
Kemira OYJ: 33 milijonov EUR;
L'Air Liquide SA and Chemoxal SA: EUR 0;
L'Air Liquide SA in Chemoxal SA: 0 EUR;
Snia SpA and Caffaro Srl, jointly and severally: EUR 1,078 million;
Snia SpA in Caffaro Srl, solidarno: 1,078 milijona EUR;
Solvay SA/NV: EUR 167,062 million;
Solvay SA/NV: 167,062 milijona EUR;
Arkema SA: EUR 78,663 million, of which EUR 42 million jointly and severally with Total SA and EUR 65,1 million jointly and severally with Elf Aquitaine SA.
Arkema SA: 78,663 milijona EUR, od česar 42 milijonov EUR solidarno s podjetjem Total SA in 65,1 milijona EUR solidarno s podjetjem Elf Aquitaine SA.
The undertakings listed above were ordered to bring to an end immediately the infringements referred to in that Article, in so far as they have not already done so and to refrain from repeating any act or conduct described in recital and from any act or conduct having the same or similar object or effect.
Zgoraj našteta podjetjem je bilo odrejeno, da takoj prenehajo s kršitvami iz navedenega člena, če tega še niso storile, in da se vzdržijo kakršnih koli dejanj ali ravnanj, opisanih v navedbi (2) ter kakršnih koli dejanj ali ravnanj, ki imajo enak ali podoben cilj ali učinek.
As EKA's evidence enabled the Commission to trace back the cartel to 31 January 1994, in accordance with point 23 of the Leniency Notice, these elements will not be taken into account when setting the fine, resulting in an increase for duration of 20 % instead of 55 % for this undertaking.
Ker so dokazi podjetja EKA Komisiji omogočili, da je lahko ugotovila obstoj kartela vse od 31. januarja 1994, v skladu s točko 23 obvestila o prizanesljivosti ti elementi ne bodo upoštevani pri določanju globe, kar za to podjetje pomeni povečanje zaradi časa trajanja v višini 20 %, namesto 55 %.
Such decisions include: As regards Degussa: Commission decision of 23 November 1984 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/30.907 — Peroxygen products, OJ L 35 of 7.2.1985, p. 1), Commission decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31.149 — Polypropylene, OJ L 230 of 18.8.1986, p. 1).
Te odločbe so: Za podjetje Degussa: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. novembra 1984 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/30.907 – Izdelki iz peroksida, UL L 35, 7.2.1985, str. 1), Odločba Komisije z dne 23. aprila 1986 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31.149 – Polipropilen, UL L 230, 18.8.1985, str. 1).
As regards Edison: Commission decision of 27 July 1994 relating to a proceeding under Art. 85 of the EEC Treaty (IV/31865 — PVC II, OJ L 239 of 14.9.1994, p. 14).
Za podjetje Edison: Odločba Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994 v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 85 Pogodbe EGS (IV/31865 – PVC II, UL L 239, 14.9.1994, str. 14).
As regards Solvay: Commission decision of 23 November 1984 quoted (Peroxygen products), Commission decision of 23 April 1986 quoted (Polypropylene), Commission decision of 27 July 1994 quoted (PVC II).
Za podjetje Solvay: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. novembra 1984, navedena zgoraj (Izdelki iz peroksida), Odločba Komisije z dne 23. aprila 1986, navedena zgoraj (Polipropilen), Odločba Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994, navedena zgoraj (PVC II).
As regards Atofina/Arkema: Commission decision of 23 November 1984 quoted (Peroxygen products), Commission decision of 27 July 1994 quoted (PVC II).
Za podjetje Atofina/Arkema: Odločba Komisije z dne 23. novembra 1984, navedena zgoraj (Izdelki iz peroksida), Odločba Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994, navedena zgoraj (PVC II).
The increase for recidivism applies only to Atofina and not to its parent companies, Elf Aquitaine and Total, as the latter were not in control of Atofina at the time of the previous infringement.
Povečanje zaradi ponavljanja kaznivih dejanj velja zgolj za podjetje Atofina in ne za njegovi matični podjetji Elf Aquitaine in Total, saj ti nista nadzorovali podjetja Atofina v času prejšnjih kršitev.
The multiplying factor applied to Total, namely 3 is not included in the calculation.
Multiplikator, uporabljen za podjetje Total, ki je 3, ni vključen v izračun.
Instead a multiplying factor of 1.25, which would have been applied had Atofina been the sole addressee of the Decision (given its worldwide turnover of 5.7 billion EUR in 2005), is used for the purposes of calculating recidivism.
Namesto tega se za izračun povečanja zaradi ponavljanja kaznivih dejanj uporablja multiplikator 1,25, ki bi sicer veljal za podjetje Atofina, če bi bilo to podjetje edini naslovnik te odločbe (ob upoštevanju svetovnega prometa v višini 5,7 milijarde EUR v letu 2005).
A separate fine is accordingly addressed to Atofina alone for this amount.
Zato je za to vsoto naslovljena ločena globa zgolj za podjetje Atofina.
See the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2005 in joined cases T-71/03, T-74/03, T-87/03 and T-91/03 Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd. and Others v Commission, not yet reported (see OJ C 205 of 20.8.2005, p. 18), paragraph 390.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 15. junija 2005 v združenih zadevah T-71/03, T-74/03, T-87/03 in T-91/03, Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd in drugi proti Komisiji, poročila še ni (glej UL C 205, 20.8.2005, str. 18), odstavek 390.
EKA terminated its involvement in the infringement no later than the time at which it submitted the evidence and its involvement has remained terminated.
Podjetje EKA je svoje sodelovanje v kršitvi prekinilo najkasneje ob času, ko je zagotovilo dokaze in v kršitvi ni več sodelovalo.
The Commission therefore will apply a reduction of fines in the band of 30-50 %.
Zato bo Komisija zmanjšala globo v razponu 30–50 %.
on State Aid No C 8/2005 (ex N 451/2004) which Germany is planning to implement for Nordbrandenburger UmesterungsWerke
o državni pomoči št. C 8/2005 (prej N 451/2004) Nemčije za Nordbrandenburger UmesterungsWerke
(notified under document number C(2006) 2088)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 2088)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi,
By letter dated 11 October 2004, registered as received on 12 October 2004, Germany informed the Commission of its intention to implement a regional aid measure for NUW Nordbrandenburger UmesterungsWerke.
Nemčija je v dopisu z dne 11. oktobra 2004, evidentiranem 12. oktobra 2004, Komisijo obvestila o svoji nameri, da odobri ukrep regionalne pomoči v korist podjetja NUW Nordbrandenburger Umesterungs-Werke.
The aid was registered as notified aid number N 451/2004.
Ukrep je bil evidentiran kot priglašena pomoč pod številko N 451/2004.
In response to a Commisison request for information sent on 6 November 2004, Germany submitted further information on 16 December 2004.
Na vprašanja Komisije z dne 6. novembra 2004 je Nemčija 16. decembra posredovala nadaljnje informacije.
By letter dated 16 February 2005 the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of the aid.
V dopisu z dne 16. februarja 2005 je Komisija Nemčiji sporočila, da bo glede te pomoči sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission's decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Odločitev Komisije, da sproži formalni postopek preiskave, je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Interested parties were invited to submit their comments on the aid measure.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile pozvane, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
By letter dated 22 March 2005, registered as received on 23 March 2005, Germany replied to the initiation of proceedings and submitted comprehensive additional information to the Commission.
V dopisu z dne 22. marca 2005, evidentiranem 23. marca 2005, je Nemčija odgovorila na sprožitev postopka preiskave in Komisiji posredovala obsežne dodatne informacije.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb zainteresiranih strank.
As a result of its own investigations the Commission established that the information provided by Germany was not complete and by letter dated 8 November 2005 it sent further questions to Germany.
Komisija je na podlagi lastnih preiskav ugotovila, da so bile informacije, ki jih je predložila Nemčija, nepopolne, in je v dopisu z dne 8. novembra 2005 Nemčiji zastavila nadaljnja vprašanja.
Germany replied on 13 January 2006 and submitted further information.
Nemčija je odgovorila 13. januarja 2006 in predložila nadaljnje informacije.
The recipient and the project
Upravičenec in projekt
The recipient of the aid is NUW Nordbrandenburger UmesterungsWerke GmbH & Co. KG (‘NUW’), located in Schwedt, in the Land of Brandenburg, Germany, an assisted area pursuant to Article 87(3)(a) of the Treaty.
Upravičenec pomoči je NUW Nordbrandenburger UmesterungsWerke GmbH & Co. KG (v nadaljnjem besedilu „NUW“) s sedežem v mestu Schwedt, Brandenburg (Nemčija), na območju, ki prejema pomoč v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
NUW was established on 4 May 2004.
Podjetje NUW je bilo ustanovljeno 4. maja 2004.
Before the implementation of the planned investment it will not carry out any operational activities.
Pred izvedbo načrtovane naložbe podjetje ne bo izvajalo operativnih dejavnosti.
Consequently, in October 2004 NUW did not yet have any full-time or part-time employees.
Oktobra 2004 zato podjetje NUW ni imelo zaposlenih s polnim ali skrajšanim delovnim časom.
NUW intends to build and operate in Schwedt a manufacturing plant for biodiesel with an expected annual capacity of 130000 tonnes and eligible investment costs of EUR 41,84 million. It will mainly deliver to PCK Raffinerie GmbH Schwedt (‘PCK’), whose equipment is currently being prepared for the further processing of biofuels.
NUW načrtuje izgradnjo in delovanje obrata za proizvodnjo biodizla s predvideno letno zmogljivostjo 130000 ton in upravičenimi stroški naložbe v višini 41,84 milijona EUR. Podjetje bo dobavljalo predvsem rafineriji PCK Raffinerie GmbH Schwedt (v nadaljnjem besedilu „PCK“), čigar obrati so trenutno v pripravi za nadaljnjo predelavo biogoriv.
The Land of Brandenburg wants to grant NUW state aid, under schemes approved by the Commission, of 50 % of the eligible cost with a total aid amount of up to EUR 20,92 million.
V okviru programov pomoči, ki jih je odobrila Komisija, namerava dežela Brandenburg NUW dodeliti pomoč v višini 50 % upravičenih stroškov celotnega zneska v višini do 20,92 milijona EUR.
The aid will be provided in the form of a direct investment grant of EUR 14,204 million and in the form of an investment premium of EUR 6,716 million on the basis of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic structures (in original language: ‘Gemeinschaftsaufgabe Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur’) (hereinafter referred to as the GA scheme) and under the aid scheme entitled ‘Investment premium for investment at operational level in the year 2004’ (in original language: ‘Investitionszulage für betriebliche Investitionen im Jahr 2004’).
Pomoč bo dodeljena v obliki neposredne sredstev za naložbe v višini 14,204 milijona EUR in dodatka za naložbe v višini 6,716 milijona EUR na podlagi skupne pobude „Izboljšanje regionalne gospodarske strukture“ (Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur) (v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚Gemeinschaftsaufgabe‘) in v okviru programa pomoči ‚Dodatek za naložbe, namenjen naložbam na operativni ravni v letu 2004‘ (Investitionszulage für betriebliche Investitionen im Jahr 2004).
Germany will ensure that the 50 % ceiling for aid intensity will not be exceeded.
Deutschland wird sicherstellen, dass die Obergrenze von 50 % Beihilfeintensität nicht überschritten wird.
Reasons for initiating the formal investigation procedure
Vzroki za sprožitev formalnega postopka preiskave
Since the aid is based on approved schemes the Commission limits its assessment to the question whether the recipient qualifies as an SME and is thus eligible for an additional SME bonus of 15 % as included in the envisaged aid amount.
Ker pomoč temelji na odobrenih programih, Komisija omejuje svojo oceno na vprašanje, ali se upravičenec uvršča med MSP in je tako upravičen do dodatka za MSP v višini 15 %, ki je vključen v znesek pomoči.
According to Article 2 of the Annex to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SME Recommendation), small and medium-sized enterprises are defined as enterprises which have fewer than 250 employees and have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million.
V skladu s členom 2 Priloge k Priporočilu Komisije 2003/361/ES z dne 6. maja 2003 o opredelitvi mikro podjetij, malih in srednjih podjetij (Priporočilo za MSP) so mala in srednja podjetja opredeljena kot podjetja, ki zaposlujejo manj kot 250 oseb in dosegajo letni promet v višini največ 50 milijonov EUR in/ali katerih letna bilanca skupno ne preseže 43 milijonov EUR.
The concept of undertaking does not require that the recipient be limited to one distinct legal entity; it may encompass an economic group of companies which is larger than an individual SME.
Glede na koncept podjetja upravičenec ni omejen na en poseben pravni subjekt, ampak lahko vključuje kapitalsko povezana podjetja, ki so lahko dosti močnejša od posameznega MSP.
Enterprises may be considered to be linked enterprises if they are linked through a natural person and operate in the same relevant market or in adjacent markets.
Med povezana podjetja spadajo podjetja, ki so med seboj povezana preko fizične osebe in opravljajo svojo dejavnost na istem trgu ali sosednjih trgih.
The link between NUW and other enterprises through natural persons, in particular through members of the Sauter family, may result in joint activities in the same or adjacent markets.
Povezava med NUW in nadaljnjimi podjetji preko fizične osebe, zlasti preko članov družine „Sauter“, lahko privede do skupnih dejavnosti na istem trgu ali sosednjih trgih.
Linked enterprises are taken into account jointly when staff headcounts and financial amounts are calculated in establishing the SME status of an enterprise.
Povezana podjetja se upoštevajo pri preverjanju statusa za MSP in izračunu števila zaposlenih nekega podjetja.
With regard to the relations between the above mentioned enterprises, the Commission doubted whether the recipient of the investment aid, NUW, really needs to benefit from the advantages accruing to SMEs from the different rules or measures in their favour and that NUW would be eligible for the notified SME bonus.
Glede na odnose med navedenimi podjetji Komisija dvomi, da upravičenec pomoči za naložbe dejansko potrebuje prednosti, ki bi za NUW izhajale iz različnih programov in ukrepov v korist MSP, in da je podjetje NUW upravičeno do priglašenega dodatka za MSP.
The Commission also doubted that the recipient complies with the definition of an SME under the SME Recommendation.
Komisija dvomi, da upravičenec ustreza opredelitvi za MSP iz Priporočila za MSP.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PART IES
PRIPOMBE ZAINTERESIRANIH STRANK
The Commission did not receive any comments from interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela pripomb zainteresiranih strank.
Criterion of independence
Merilo neodvisnosti
Germany explains that NUW Verwaltung GmbH is financially not involved in the recipient NUW.
Nemčija navaja, da podjetje NUW Verwaltung GmbH pri upravičencu NUW finančno ni udeleženo.
Its operational objective is exclusively to take over the management and to assume the liabilities of NUW.
Njegov edini operativni cilj je prevzem upravljanja in jamstvo za obveznosti podjetja NUW.
All other complementary enterprises (‘Verwaltung GmbH’) exclusively take over the liabilities of their relevant enterprises and do not carry out further operations.
Tudi druga komplementarna podjetja („Verwaltung GmbH“) jamčijo samo vsak za svoje podjetje in ne izvajajo nadaljnjih poslovnih dejavnosti.
Whereas Daniela Sauter has a 74 % stake in NUW, her holdings in NBE Nordbrandenburger BioEnergie GmbH & Co. KG, MBE Mitteldeutsche BioEnergie GmbH & Co. KG and SBE Swiss BioEnergy AG do not exceed 50 %.
Medtem ko je Daniela Sauter udeležena pri NUW s 74 %, pa njena udeležba pri NBE Nordbrandenburger BioEnergie GmbH & Co. KG, MBE Mitteldeutsche BioEnergie GmbH & Co. KG in SBE Swiss BioEnergy AG ne presega 50 %.
According to Germany there are no other enterprises linked to NUW.
Nemčija navaja, da podjetje NUW ni povezano z drugimi podjetji.
With regard to the partner enterprises Germany states that Daniela Sauter has holdings of 50 % in NBE, 38 % in MBE and 20 % in SBE.
V povezavi s partnerskimi podjetji znaša udeležba Daniele Sauter po podatkih Nemčije 50 % v NBE in 38 % v MBE; v SBE je udeležena z 20 %.
Consequently, only the holdings in NBE and MBE would be relevant for the assessment of the recipient's size.
Posledično so bile za oceno velikosti upravičenca pomembne le udeležbe v NBE in MBE.
With regard to possible joint behaviour by a group of natural persons, Germany informs the Commission that Daniela Sauter and Georg Pollert as the main partners of NUW appear jointly only with regard to NUW, but not with regard to other undertakings.
Glede morebitnega skupnega delovanja skupine fizičnih oseb je Nemčija Komisiji sporočila, da Daniela Sauter in Dr. Georg Pollert nastopata skupaj kot glavna komanditista podjetja NUW le za omenjeno podjetje, ne pa za druga podjetja.
Their joint interests exclusively concern NUW; apart from the deed of partnership, no other agreements exist.
Njuni skupni interesi so omejeni izključno na NUW; poleg družbene pogodbe drugi dogovori niso bili sklenjeni.
Germany underlines that regarding the involvement of brothers, parents and the sister-in-law no uniform structure of holdings exists that may involve equal interests.
Nemčija poudarja, da pri udeležbi bratov, staršev in svakinje enotna struktura udeležbe, ki bi nakazovala enake interese, ne obstaja.
Apart from the fact that they are relatives there are no legal or economic relations between these persons.
Ne glede na stopnjo sorodstva navedene osebe niso v pravnih ali gospodarskih odnosih.
Apart from the deed of partnership, no other agreements exist.
Razen družbene pogodbe drugi dogovori niso bili sklenjeni.
Relevant markets
Zadevni trgi
According to Germany, NUW and MUW Mitteldeutsche UmesterungsWerke GmbH & Co. KG operate on the same market although their customers are different.
Po podatkih Nemčije sta podjetji NUW in MUW Mitteldeutsche UmesterungsWerke GmbH & Co. KG dejavni na istem trgu, vendar za različne stranke.
The enterprises have a relationship via Mr Pollert, but this is low-key and not significant.
Podjetji sta povezani preko gospoda Dr. Pollerta, kar pa zaradi nizke intenzivnosti ni odločilnega pomena.
Whereas NUW will produce biodiesel, NBE and MBE are active in the bioethanol market.
Po podatkih Nemčije proizvaja NUW biodizel, podjetji NBE in MBE pa sta dejavni na trgu z bioetanolom.
Although the customers of all three companies are the large oil companies, the input of raw materials and the production processes are substantially different.
Čeprav so velike naftne družbe stranke vseh treh podjetij, pa slednja uporabljajo zelo različne surovine in proizvodne postopke.