natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These long-standing basic principles of Community state aid policy have recently been confirmed in the State Aid Action Plan: Less and better targeted state aid: a roadmap for state aid reform 2005-2009. http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/action_plan/
Ta dolgoletna osnovna načela politike Skupnosti glede državnih pomoči so bila nedavno potrjena v akcijskem načrtu državnih pomoči: Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–2009. http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/action_plan/
Judgement of 24 July 2003 in case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH [2003] ECR I-7747, at 88-94.
Sodba z dne 24. julija 2003, zadeva C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH, [2003] Recueil, str. I-7747, odstavki 88–94.
See footnote 72.
Glej opombo 72.
See paragraph 59.
Glej odstavek 58.
See paragraphs 57-61.
Glej odstavke 57 do 60.
Mabb (2003): Berlin goes digital, p. 14: ‘Es gibt aber ein Interesse der privaten Veranstalter an der Erhaltung des dritten Weges, einerseits um nicht allein in die Abhängigkeit von Kabel und Satellit zu geraten, zum anderen um mobile und portable Nutzungen entwickeln zu können.’
Mabb (2003): Berlin goes digital, str. 14.
Germany has highlighted the strong market position of cable networks in Berlin-Brandenburg. It explains, however, that this position results mainly from court rulings which enable landlords to oblige tenants to pay for cable subscription as part of their rent.
Zvezna vlada je poudarila močan tržni položaj kabelskih omrežij v Berlin-Brandenburgu, ki pa je v glavnem posledica sodnih odločb, ki najemodajalcem omogočajo, da najemnikom v sklopu najemnine nalagajo plačilo kabelske naročnine.
As Germany itself concedes, DVB-T can, in this situation, hardly challenge the market position of cable networks.
Zvezna vlada priznava, da DVB-T pod temi pogoji ne more ogroziti tržnega položaja kabelskih omrežij.
COM(2003)541 final, ‘Communication on the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting (from digital “switch-over” to analogue “switch-off”) ’.
COM(2003) 541 konč.
Interactivity can be achieved only by deploying DVB-RCT (Return Channel Terrestrial), which involves additional costs and a more expensive set-top box, or by conventional return channels like the telephone or an interactive cable connection.
Interaktivnost je mogoče doseči zgolj z zagotovitvijo DVB-RCT (Return Channel Terrestrial, prizemni povratni kanal), kar pomeni dodatne stroške in drag TV komunikator, ali pa z običajnim povratnim kanalom, kot sta telefonski in interaktivni televizijski kabel.
Unlike digital cable, which may be upgraded with a return channel to provide advanced interactive services, in parallel with the pure transmission of broadcasting signals.
Za razliko od digitalnega kabla, ki ga je mogoče opremiti s povratnim kanalom za vzporedno zagotovitev radiofuznega prenosa in naprednih interaktivnih storitev.
The DVB project has therefore developed a new transmission standard, DVB-Handheld (DVB-H), but the latest information on the DVB-H standard is that commercial deployments may be more than three years away (see Analysys Study, August 2005).
Za projekt DVB je bil zato razvit nov standard za oddajanje (DVB-Handheld, DVB-H), toda po najnovejših informacijah bo standard za komercialno uporabo na razpolago šele čez tri leta ali več. (glej Analysys Study, avgust 2005).
Commission Decisions NN 88/98, BBC 24-hours (OJ C 78, 18.3.2000) and NN 70/98, ‘Kinderkanal and Phoenix’ ( OJ C 238, 21.8.1999).
Odločbe Komisije v zadevah NN 88/98 BBC News 24-urni informativni program brez reklam (UL C 78, 18.3.2000) in NN 70/98, „Kinderkanal and Phoenix“ ( UL C 238, 21.8.1999).
N622/03 Digitalisierungsfonds — Austria, Commission decision of 16 March 2005, see http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/decisions/additional_docs.html
N 622/03 Digitalisierungsfonds – Österreich, Odločba Komisije z dne 16. marca 2005, glej http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/decisions/additional_docs.html
In this respect, the case is different from the Court judgement of 13 June 2002 in case C-382/99 The Netherlands v Commission, Dutch Service Stations [2002] ECR I-5163, at 60-69 where oil companies were considered indirect beneficiaries of an aid granted to Dutch service stations.
V tem smislu se tukaj obravnavani primer razlikuje od sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. junija 2002 v zadevi C-382/99, Nizozemska proti Komisiji, (Bencinski servisi), [2002] Recueil, str. I-5163, odstavki 60 do 69, v kateri so bile naftne družbe obravnavane kot posredne upravičenke pomoči, dodeljene enemu izmed nizozemskih bencinskih servisov.
In that case, the aid had the effect of releasing the oil companies from a contractual obligation to grant a discount to the service stations.
Ta pomoč je naftne družbe namreč osvobodila pogodbene obveznosti dajanja določenih popustov.
In contrast, in the present case, there is no automatic and quantifiable relationship between the amount of aid given to the CSBs and the transmission fees charged by T-Systems.
V tu obravnavanem primeru pa ne obstaja samodejna in izmerljiva povezava med zneski pomoči, dodeljenimi zasebnim televizijskim postajam, in ceno, ki jo je T-Systems zaračunal za prenos.
Only for some broadcasters in case of a change in the fee, such a relationship exists but since switch-over, transmission fees have been stable.
Takšna povezava za primer spremembe cene je bila ugotovljena le pri nekaterih televizijskih postajah, drugače pa so od prehoda cene za prenos ostale nespremenjene.
The licences for the DVB-T network are limited until the end of 2025 [25].
V praksi T-Systems upravlja tudi z obema multipleksoma, ki sta bila dodeljena RBB. RBB und T-Systems sta sklenila sporazum, po katerem T-Systems od RBB prevzame zagotovitev, dajanje v najem in delovanje tehnične infrastrukture za oddajanje DVB-T.
In practice, T-Systems operates the two multiplexes allocated to RBB.
Sporazum je začel veljati 28. februarja 2003 z drugo fazo prehoda in je veljaven deset let.
The two companies have concluded an agreement whereby T-Systems takes over the provision, letting and operation of the technical infrastructure for the transmission of DVB-T on behalf of RBB.
Poleg tega so T-Systems in vsi izdajatelji televizijskega programa skupine ARD sklenili „Okvirni sporazum o zagotovitvi DVB-T v Nemčiji“ (Rahmenvertrag zur DVB-T-Versorgung in Deutschland), ki T-Systems pooblašča za tehnično upravljanje omrežij DVB-T.
The agreement entered into force on 28 February 2003 (start of the second phase of the switch-over) and will run for ten years. Moreover, T-Systems and all broadcasters of the ARD group have concluded a ‘Framework Agreement for the provision of DVB-T in Germany’ which charges T-Systems with the technical operation of the DVB-T networks.
Licence za omrežje DVB-T veljajo do konca leta 2025 [25].
The total transmission capacity for broadcasting consisted in seven multiplexes.
Skupna prenosna zmogljivost za radiodifuzijo je zajemala sedem multipleksov.
It was finally allocated as follows: three entire multiplexes (K 07, K 27 and K 33) and one programme channel on a fourth multiplex (K 05) to the PSBs (ARD and ZDF).
Ti so bili na koncu dodeljeni na naslednji način: trije celotni multipleksi (K 07, K 27, K 33) in eno programsko mesto na četrtem multipleksu (K 05) javnopravnima televizijskima ustanovama (ARD in ZDF).
Furthermore, it claimed that the benefit conferred by the assistance was passed on through payment of the transmission fees to the network operator T-Systems.
ProSiebenSat.1 tudi navaja, da so bile s pomočjo dodeljene ugodnosti prenesene na omrežnega operaterja T-Systems, in sicer kot plačilo za prenos.
Lastly, it stated that the assistance provided by Mabb reduced the competitive advantage enjoyed by the PSBs, which had access to a substantial level of fee income for the introduction of DVB-T.
Nazadnje ProSiebenSat.1 navaja, da podpora Mabb-a zmanjšuje konkurenčno prednost javnopravnih televizijskih ustanov, katerim je bila za uvedbo DVB-T dodeljena precejšnja vsota iz naslova RTV-naročnine.
The transition from analogue to digital broadcasting (‘digital switch-over’) has great advantages in terms of more efficient spectrum usage and increased transmission possibilities.
Prehod z analogne na digitalno televizijo („digitalni prehod“) prinaša velike prednosti v obliki učinkovite uporabe frekvenc in večjih možnosti prenosa.
These will lead to new and better quality services and to wider consumer choice.
Te bodo vodile k novim in boljšim storitvam ter večji izbiri za potrošnika.
The compensation should take into account the actual costs of the switch-over to broadcasters including costs to adapt equipment to digital transmission and to broadcast in another channel/multiplex where applicable and including spectrum costs.
Odškodnina mora upoštevati dejanske stroške televizijskih postaj za prehod, vključno s stroški za prilagoditev na digitalni prenos in po potrebi za oddajanje na drugem kanalu oz. multipleksu kot tudi stroške za frekvence.
When calculating spectrum costs the granting of digital transmission capacity should be taken into account.
Pri izračunu stroškov za frekvence je treba upoštevati dodelitev digitalne prenosne zmogljivosti.
The Federal Republic of Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures already taken and planned to comply with it.
Zvezna republika Nemčija v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, že sprejetih ali načrtovanih za izvajanje te odločbe.
It will provide this information using the questionnaire attached in the Annex of this Decision.
Pri tem uporabi vprašalnik, priložen v prilogi Odločbe.
Moreover, a report by Mabb points out that the CSBs themselves had an interest to sustain the terrestrial platform as a third platform, on the one hand, in order to limit their dependence on cable and satellite providers and, on the other, to be able to develop mobile and portable applications [80]. In particular the latter point illustrates that the CSBs may well be able to internalise some of the positive externalities of the digital switch-over.
Poleg tega so po Mabb-ovem poročilu zasebne televizijske postaje imele interes za ohranitev prizemne platforme kot tretje platforme, „po eni strani zato, da ne bi bile odvisne le od kabelskega in satelitskega omrežja, po drugi strani pa zaradi omogočanja razvoja mobilnih in prenosnih uporab.“ [80] Predvsem druga točka ponazarja, da bi zasebne televizijske postaje vsekakor lahko delno internalizirale pozitivne zunanje učinke digitalnega prehoda.
RTLII → Pro7 Simulcast
RTLII → Pro7 simultano oddajanje
Moreover, Mabb is subject to legal supervision by the Land governments of Berlin and Brandenburg (‘staatliche Rechtsaufsicht’) [42] and its annual budget is subject to control by the Court of Auditors of the Land of Berlin [43].
Poleg tega je Mabb podrejen državnemu pravnemu nadzoru, ki ga izvajata deželni vladi Brandenburga in Berlina [42], letni proračun pa je pod nadzorom Računskega sodišča dežele Berlin [43].
The public task of relevance in the present case is laid down in the State Media Treaty as well as in the State Broadcasting Treaty.
Pomembna javna naloga v zadevnem primeru je določena v državni pogodbi o medijih in v državni pogodbi o radiodifuziji.
The Commission notes that the policy documents cited by Germany encourage the digitisation of broadcasting in general.
Komisija opaža, da poročila, ki jih navaja Nemčija, podpirajo digitalizacijo radiofuzije na splošno.
They do not, however, provide a universal justification why only the digitisation of the terrestrial platform should be aided and not that of other transmission platforms.
Vendar pa ne nudijo splošne upravičenosti za to, da se pospešuje zgolj digitalizacija prizemne platforme, ne pa tudi digitalizacija drugih platform za oddajanje signala.
With respect to capacity, only one multiplex is currently allocated to new media services.
Glede zmogljivosti je za zdaj zagotovljen le en multipleks.
With respect to the public support, only the transmission of television channels is subsidised and not the provision of any other services.
Državna podpora je namenjena le prenosu televizijskih programov, ne pa zagotavljanju drugih storitev.
The Commission has also approved a Digitalisation Fund in Austria which comprises several measures supporting the digitisation of broadcasting [87]. The measures include:
Komisija je odobrila tudi sklad za digitalizacijo v Avstriji, ki zajema več ukrepov za pospeševanje digitalizacije radiodifuzije [87] Ti ukrepi zajemajo:
Having regard to those comments, Whereas:
ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
Moreover, cable operators have submitted data showing that their churn rate (rate of customers cancelling their subscription) has increased significantly since the digital terrestrial switch-over (see Figure 2) [68]. Among the reasons why viewers opt for DVB-T instead of cable, a survey has identified in particular the fact that DVB-T reception is free of charge while cable requires a monthly subscription fee [69].
Poleg tega so kabelski operaterji predložili podatke o tem, da je stopnja odpovedi (delež strank, ki so odpovedale naročnino, „churn rate“) od digitalnega prehoda močno narasla (glej Diagram 2) [68] Razlogi za to, zakaj so se gledalci namesto za kabelski sprejem odločili za DVB-T, sodeč po anketi ležijo predvsem v tem, da je sprejem DVB-T brezplačen, medtem ko je za kabelski sprejem potrebno plačevati mesečno naročnino [69].
of 20 July 2006
z dne 20. julija 2006
on compliance of certain standards with the general safety requirement of Directive 2001/95/EC and the publication of their references in the Official Journal
o skladnosti določenih standardov s splošno varnostno zahtevo Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/95/ES in objavi njihovih sklicevanj v Uradnem listu
(notified under document number C(2006) 3277)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 3277)
Having regard to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety [1], and in particular Article 4(2), second and fourth subparagraphs thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov [1], in zlasti drugega ter četrtega pododstavka člena 4(2),
After consulting the Standing Committee set up in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on information Society Services [2],
po posvetovanju s Stalnim odborom, ustanovljenim v skladu s členom 5 Direktive 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov ter pravil o storitvah informacijske družbe [2],
In these cases, the Commission shall, on its initiative or at the request of a Member State, decide in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15(2) of that Directive whether the standard in question meets the general safety requirement.
V teh primerih Komisija na lastno pobudo ali zahtevo države članice po postopku iz člena 15(2) navedene Direktive odloči, ali obravnavani standard izpolnjuje splošno varnostno zahtevo.
The intention of the legislator was to ensure co-operation with the European standardisation bodies and to recognise suitable safety standards applicable to products falling under the scope of the Directive for which a Commission mandate was not issued in accordance with the relevant provisions referred to in Article 4.
Namen zakonodajalca je bil zagotoviti sodelovanje z evropskimi organi za standarde kot tudi prepoznati ustrezne varnostne standarde, ki se uporabljajo za proizvode, za katere velja Direktiva in za katere Komisija ni izdala mandata Komisije v skladu z ustreznimi določbami iz člena 4.
The references of the standards in the Annex shall be published in the part C of the Official Journal of the European Union.
Sklicevanja na standarde iz priloge se objavijo v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 20 July 2006.
V Bruslju, 20. julija 2006
Directive amended by Directive 98/48/EC (OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).
Direktiva, spremenjena z direktivo 98/48/ES (UL L 217, 5.8.1998, str. 18).
EN 581-1:2006 ‘Outdoor furniture — Seating and tables for camping, domestic and contract use — Part 1: General safety requirements’
EN 581-1:2006 „Zunanje pohištvo – Sedežno pohištvo in mize za domačo in javno uporabo ter taborjenje – 1. del: Splošne varnostne zahteve“
EN 957-1:2005 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 1: General safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-1:2005 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 1. del: Splošne varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-2:2003 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 2: Strength training equipment, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-2:2003 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 2. del: Oprema za vadbo moči, dodatne posebne varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-4:1996 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 4: Strength training benches, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-4:1996 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 4. del: Klopi za vadbo moči, dodatne posebne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-5:1996 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 5: Pedal crank training equipment, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-5:1996 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 5. del: Oprema za vadbo s pedalnimi gonili, dodatne posebne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-6:2001 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 6: Treadmills, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-6:2001 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 6. del: Tekoče preproge, dodatne posebne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-7:1998 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 7: Rowing machines, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-7:1998 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 7. del: Naprave za veslanje, dodatne posebne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-8:1998 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 8: Steppers, stair climbers and climbers — Additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-8:1998 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 8. del: Steperji, tekoče stopnice, vzpenjalniki. Dodatne posebne varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-9:2003 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 9: Elliptical trainers, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-9:2003 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 9. del: Pedalniki, dodatne posebne varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 957-10:2005 ‘Stationary training equipment — Part 10: Exercise bicycles with a fixed wheel or without freewheel, additional specific safety requirements and test methods’
EN 957-10:2005 „Nepremična oprema za vadbo – 10. del: Sobna kolesa z nepomičnim kolesom ali brez prostega kolesa, dodatne posebne varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 13209-1:2004 ‘Child use and care articles — Baby carriers — Safety requirements and test methods — Part 1: Framed back carriers’
EN 13209-1:2004 „Izdelki za otroke in nego otrok – Oprema za nošenje dojenčkov – Varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode – 1. del: Nahrbtniki z ogrodjem“
EN 14682:2004 ‘Safety of children's clothing — Cords and drawstrings on children's clothing — Specifications’
EN 14682:2004 „Varnost otroških oblačil – Vrvice in vezalke na otroških oblačilih – Specifikacije“
EN 14764:2005 ‘City and trekking bicycles — Safety requirements and test methods’
EN 14764:2005 „Mestna in treking kolesa – Varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 14766:2005 ‘Mountain-bicycles — Safety requirements and test methods’
EN 14766:2005 „Gorska kolesa – Varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 14781:2005 ‘Racing bicycles — Safety requirements and test methods’
EN 14781:2005 „Tekmovalna kolesa – Varnostne zahteve in preskusne metode“
EN 14872:2006 ‘Bicycles — Accessories for bicycles — Luggage carriers’
EN 14872:2006 „Kolesa – Kolesarska oprema – Prtljažniki“
of 18 May 2006
z dne 18. maja 2006
on the conclusion of the Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
o sklenitvi Konvencije o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 133, 151, 181 and 181a in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2), and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 133, 151, 181 in 181a v povezavi z drugim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
In November 2004, the Council authorised the Commission to participate, on behalf of the Community, in negotiations at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) concerning a Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, hereinafter referred to as the ‘UNESCO Convention’.
Novembra 2004 je Svet pooblastil Komisijo, da v imenu Skupnosti sodeluje pri Organizaciji združenih narodov za izobraževanje, znanost in kulturo (UNESCO) v pogajanjih glede Konvencije o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov (v nadaljevanju „Konvencija UNESCA“).
The Commission participated in these negotiations, together with the Member States.
Komisija in države članice so se udeležile teh pogajanj.
The UNESCO Convention was adopted at the General Conference of UNESCO in Paris on 20 October 2005.
Konvencija UNESCA je bila sprejeta na splošni konferenci UNESCA 20. oktobra 2005 v Parizu.
The UNESCO Convention constitutes a relevant and effective pillar for promoting cultural diversity and cultural exchanges, to which both the Community, as reflected in Article 151(4) of the Treaty, and its Member States, attach the greatest importance.
Ta konvencija UNESCA sestavlja pomemben in učinkovit steber spodbujanja kulturne raznolikosti in kulturnih izmenjav, ki jim tako Skupnost, kakor to odraža člen 151(4) Pogodbe, kot tudi njene države članice pripisujejo izredno velik pomen.
It contributes towards ensuring mutual respect and understanding between cultures at world level.
Prispeva k vzajemnemu spoštovanju in razumevanju med kulturami na svetovni ravni.
The UNESCO Convention should be approved as soon as possible.
To konvencijo UNESCA je treba čimprej odobriti.
Both the Community and its Member States have competence in the fields covered by the UNESCO Convention.
Tako Skupnost kot tudi njene države članice so pristojne na področjih, ki jih zajema Konvencija UNESCA.
The Community and the Member States should therefore become Contracting Parties to it, so that together they can fulfil the obligations laid down by the UNESCO Convention and exercise the rights invested in them by it, in situations of mixed competence in a coherent manner,
Zato naj Skupnost in države članice postanejo pogodbenice Konvencije UNESCA, tako da bodo skupaj lahko izpolnjevale v Konvenciji zapisane obveznosti in v primerih mešane pristojnosti usklajeno izvrševale pravice, ki po Konvenciji izhajajo iz njih –
The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
Konvencija UNESCA o varovanju in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnih izrazov se odobri v imenu Skupnosti.
The text of the UNESCO Convention is contained in Annex 1(a) to this Decision.
Besedilo Konvencije UNESCA je v Prilogi 1(a) k temu sklepu.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to deposit the instrument of accession, on behalf of the Community, with the Director-General of UNESCO, in accordance with Article 27(4) of the UNESCO Convention.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen za imenovanje oseb(-e), pooblaščene(-ih) za deponiranje listine o pristopu, v imenu Skupnosti, pri generalnem direktorju UNESCA, v skladu s členom 27(4) Konvencije UNESCA.