natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90, the date ‘31 December 2006’ shall be replaced by the date ‘30 June 2007’.
V prvem pododstavku člena 6(4) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1907/90 se datum „31. decembra 2006“ nadomesti z datumom „30. junija 2007“.
OJ L 186, 7.7.2006, p. 1.
UL L 186, 7.7.2006, str. 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1583/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1583/2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz etanolaminov s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (hereinafter referred to as the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 9 and 11(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (v nadaljevanju „osnovna uredba“) in zlasti členov 9 in 11(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je Komisija predložila po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
In February 1994, the Council imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 229/94 [2] definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of ethanolamines (product concerned) originating in the United States of America (USA).
Svet je februarja 1994 z Uredbo (ES) št. 229/94 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz etanolaminov („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom iz Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“).
The duties took the form of minimum-price-based variable duties for the three types of ethanolamines, i.e. monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and triethanolamine (TEA).
Dajatve so bile v obliki spremenljivih dajatev, ki temeljijo na najnižji ceni, za tri vrste etanolaminov, to so monoetanolamin (MEA), dietanolamin (DEA) in trietanolamin (TEA).
Following a request of the Conseil européen des fédérations de l'industrie chimique (CEFIC) an expiry and interim review pursuant to Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation was initiated in February 1999.
Na podlagi zahtevka Sveta evropske kemične industrije (CEFIC) sta se februarja 1999 začela pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa in vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(2) in (3) osnovne uredbe.
By Regulation (EC) No 1603/2000 [3] the Council concluded these reviews and imposed definitive anti-dumping measures on imports of ethanolamines originating in the USA.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1603/2000 [3] je Svet zaključil pregleda in uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz etanolaminov s poreklom iz ZDA.
The form of the measures was changed as they took the form of a specific fixed duty per tonnes of all types of ethanolamine.
Oblika ukrepov je bila spremenjena, prevzeli so obliko posebnih fiksnih stopenj dajatev na tono vseh vrst etanolaminov.
Two of the three companies benefiting from an individual anti-dumping duty were Dow Chemical Company and Union Carbide Corporation.
Dve od treh družb, ki sta imeli koristi od individualne protidampinške dajatve, sta družbi Dow Chemical Company in Union Carbide Corporation.
After disinvestment of Dow Chemical Company's ethanolamine business into the company INEOS LLC, the individual anti-dumping duty of EUR 69,40 per tonne applicable to Dow Chemical Company was attributed to INEOS LLC [4].
Po prerazporeditvi posla etanolaminov družbe Dow Chemical Company v družbo INEOS LLC je bila individualna protidampinška dajatev v višini 69,40 EUR/tono, ki se uporablja za družbo Dow Chemical Company, dodeljena družbi INEOS LLC [4].
However, since the Dow Chemical Company acquired on 6 February 2001 all shares of Union Carbide Corporation, a company benefiting from an individual anti-dumping duty of EUR 59,25 per tonne, the Dow Chemical Company is still active in the ethanolamine business.
Ker pa je družba Dow Chemical Company 6. februarja 2001 pridobila vse delnice družbe Union Carbide Corporation, ki ima koristi od individualne protidampinške dajatve v višini 59,25 EUR/tono, je družba Dow Chemical Company še vedno dejavna v poslovanju z etanolamini.
The Union Carbide Corporation still exists but has become part of the Dow Chemical Company group and does no longer have any independent production activities.
Družba Union Carbide Corporation še vedno obstaja, vendar je postala del skupine Dow Chemical Company in nima več neodvisne proizvodnje.
Following the publication in November 2004 of a notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of ethanolamines originating in the USA [5], the Commission received on 25 April 2005 a request for a review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz etanolaminov s poreklom iz ZDA [5] novembra 2004 je Komisija 25. aprila 2005 prejela zahtevek za pregled v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by CEFIC on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 75 %, of the total Community production of ethanolamine.
Zahtevek je vložil CEFIC v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 75 % skupne proizvodnje etanolamina v Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahtevek je temeljil na predvidevanju, da bi iztek ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Skupnosti.
Having determined, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission initiated by notice of initiation an investigation [6] pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom je bilo ugotovljeno, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, zato je Komisija z obvestilom o začetku začela preiskavo [6] v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission's services officially advised the Community producers, the exporting producers in the USA, importers/traders, user industries known to be concerned, as well as the authorities of the USA of the initiation of the review.
Službe Komisije so o začetku pregleda uradno obvestile proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike v ZDA, uvoznike/trgovce, predelovalno industrijo, za katero je znano, da jo to zadeva, in organe ZDA.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
The Commission's services sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to those who requested a questionnaire within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Službe Komisije so poslale vprašalnike vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in tistim, ki so vprašalnik zahtevali v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
The Commission also gave the parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je neposredno vpletenim strankam dala tudi možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
Replies to the questionnaire were received from two exporting producers in the USA and their nine related importers in the Community, one related importer in Switzerland, three Community producers (the applicant Community producers), and one industrial user in the Community.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali dva proizvajalca izvoznika v ZDA in njunih devet povezanih uvoznikov v Skupnosti, en povezan uvoznik v Švici, trije proizvajalci Skupnosti („proizvajalci Skupnosti vložniki“) in en industrijski uporabnik v Skupnosti.
One Community producer did not fully reply to the questionnaire and only submitted succinct information and two industrial users in the Community made their views known.
En proizvajalec Skupnosti ni v celoti odgovoril na vprašalnik in je predložil le skope informacije, dva industrijska uporabnika v Skupnosti pa sta izrazila svoja stališča.
The Commission's services sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purpose of the determination of the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury and for the determination of the Community interest.
Službe Komisije so poiskale in preverile vse informacije, ki so se jim zdele potrebne za ugotovitev, ali je verjetno, da se bosta damping in škoda nadaljevala ali ponovila, in za ugotovitev interesa Skupnosti.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so bili izvedeni v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Applicant Community producers
proizvajalci Skupnosti vložniki
BASF AG, Ludwigshafen, Germany
BASF AG, Ludwigshafen, Nemčija
Innovene Europe Ltd, Staines, United Kingdom
Innovene Europe Ltd., Staines, Združeno kraljestvo
SASOL GmbH, Marl, Germany
SASOL GmbH, Marl, Nemčija
Exporting producers in the USA
proizvajalci izvozniki v ZDA
The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan and Houston, Texas, USA
Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan and Houston, Teksas, ZDA
Related importers in the Community
povezani uvozniki v Skupnosti
Dow Chemical Iberica SL, Tarragona, Spain
Dow Chemical Iberica SL, Tarragona, Španija
INEOS Oxide Ltd, Antwerp, Belgium
INEOS Oxide Ltd., Antwerp, Belgija
Related importer in Switzerland
povezani uvoznik v Švici
Dow Europe GmbH, Horgen, Switzerland
Dow Europe GmbH, Horgen, Švica
Industrial users in the Community
industrijski uporabniki v Skupnosti
Degussa Goldschmidt Espana SA, Granollers, Spain
Degussa Goldschmidt Espana SA, Granollers, Španija
The investigation regarding the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 (the RIP).
Preiskava v zvezi z nadaljevanjem ali ponovitvijo dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005 („OPP“).
The examination of the trends relevant for the assessment of a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2002 up to the end of the RIP (period considered).
Preučevanje trendov, pomembnih za oceno verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajelo obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do konca OPP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is the same as that covered by the previous investigations.
Zadevni izdelek je enak izdelku iz prejšnjih preiskav.
Ethanolamines are obtained by making ethylene oxide (EO), itself a result of a reaction of ethylene and oxygen, react with ammonia.
Etanolamini se pridobivajo tako, da etilen oksid (EO), ki nastane z reakcijo med etilenom in kisikom, reagira z amoniakom.
This synthesis leads to three competing reactions and to three different types of ethanolamines: monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and triethanolamine (TEA), depending on how many times EO is bound.
Ta sinteza povzroči tri hkratne reakcije in tri različne vrste etanolaminov: monoetanolamin (MEA), dietanolamin (DEA) in trietanolamin (TEA), odvisno od tega, kolikokrat se veže EO.
The maximum number of combinations is limited by the number of hydrogen elements in ammonia, namely three.
Največje število kombinacij je omejeno s številom vodikovih elementov v amonijaku, to je tri.
The proportions of the three types in the total output are determined by the production installation design, but can, to a certain extent, be controlled by the ammonia/EO (the molar ratio).
Delež treh vrst v skupni proizvodnji je določen s proizvodnim načrtovalnim obratom in se lahko do neke stopnje nadzira z izbiro razmerja amonijak/EO („molekulsko“ razmerje).
Community installations are typically based on naphtha as energy carrier, whereas US installations are natural gas based.
Obrati Skupnosti običajno temeljijo na primarnem bencinu kot energetskemu nosilcu, medtem ko ameriški obrati temeljijo na zemeljskem plinu.
The product concerned is used as an intermediate and/or additive for surfactants used in detergents and personal care products, cosmetics, fertilisers and crop protection agents (glyphosate), corrosion inhibitors, lubrication oils, textile auxiliaries and fabric softeners (esterquats), photographic chemicals, paper and metalworks, as a grinding and binding aid for cement production and as a gas scrubber absorption aid (sweetening the gas by removing acids).
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja kot vmesni izdelek in/ali aditiv za površinsko aktivne snovi, ki se uporabljajo v čistilnih sredstvih in izdelkih za osebno nego, kozmetiki, gnojilih in sredstvih za zaščito pridelka (glifosat), antikorozijskih sredstvih, mazalnih oljih, tekstilnih dodatkih in mehčalcih za tkanine (esterquati), fotografskih kemikalijah, pri predelavi papirja in kovin, kot pomožno sredstvo za mletje in povezovanje v proizvodnji cementa ter kot absorpcijsko pomožno sredstvo za izpiranje plinov (odstranjevanje kislin).
Since late 2004, beginning 2005, the product is also increasingly used for wood treatment.
Od konca leta 2004, začetka leta 2005 se izdelek vedno bolj uporablja tudi za obdelavo lesa.
Finally, the product can also be used by the manufacturers themselves or by their related manufacturers in the production of ethylene amines.
Nazadnje, izdelek lahko uporabljajo tudi proizvajalci sami ali njihovi povezani proizvajalci pri proizvodnji etilenaminov.
As in the previous investigations, it was shown that the product concerned produced in the USA and sold to the Community is identical in terms of physical and technical characteristics to the product produced and sold in the Community by the Community producers and that there is no difference in use between those products.
Kot v prejšnjih preiskavah se je pokazalo, da ima zadevni izdelek, proizveden v ZDA in prodan Skupnosti, enake fizikalne in tehnične lastnosti kot izdelek, ki so ga v Skupnosti proizvedli in prodali proizvajalci Skupnosti, in da se ta dva izdelka glede uporabe ne razlikujeta.
It has further been found that the product concerned produced in the USA and sold to the Community is identical to that sold on the US domestic market.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je zadevni izdelek, proizveden v ZDA in prodan Skupnosti, enak izdelku, ki se prodaja na ameriškem domačemu trgu.
Therefore, all these products must be considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je treba vse te izdelke obravnavati kot podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether dumping was currently taking place and, if so, whether or not the expiry of the measures would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping.
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe se je preučilo, ali damping trenutno obstaja, in, če obstaja, ali je verjetno, da bi iztek ukrepov povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga.
Of the four US exporting producers named in the complaint, two did cooperate in the investigation.
Od štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz ZDA, navedenih v pritožbi, dva nista sodelovala v preiskavi.
The two cooperating exporting producers represented 100 % of imports to the Community during the RIP, which amounted to 41000 tonnes.
Druga dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika sta v OPP predstavljala 100 % uvoza v Skupnost OPP, ki je znašal 41000 ton.
Imports into the Community of the product concerned originating in the USA represented 16,7 % of Community consumption during the RIP down from 29 % during the previous investigation period (1998).
Uvoz v Skupnost zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz ZDA je predstavljal 16,7 % potrošnje Skupnosti v OPP, kar je nižje od 29 % med prejšnjim obdobjem preiskave (1998).
Dumping of imports during the RIP
Damping uvoza v OPP
With regard to the two cooperating US exporting producers, normal value was established for each type of the product concerned, based on the price paid or payable on the domestic market in the USA by unrelated customers pursuant to Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation, since these sales were found to have been made in sufficient quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.
Pri dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcih izvoznikih iz ZDA je bila normalna vrednost za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka določena na osnovi cen na ameriškem domačem trgu, ki so jih nepovezane stranke plačale ali jih plačujejo, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe, ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila ta prodaja opravljena v zadostnih količinah in v običajnem poteku trgovine.
As in the original and in the previous review investigation, this investigation showed again that the two cooperating US exporting producers exported the product concerned to the Community via companies which are related.
Kot v prvotni in prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom je ta preiskava spet pokazala, da sta dva sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika iz ZDA izvažala zadevni izdelek v Skupnost prek povezanih družb.
As a consequence, and in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, export prices were constructed on the basis of the prices at which the imported product was first resold to independent customers in the Community.
Zato in v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe so bile izvozne cene konstruirane na podlagi cen, po katerih so bili uvoženi izdelki prvič ponovno prodani neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
Allowance was made for all costs incurred between importation and resale, including selling, general and administrative costs and the profit realised in the Community by the importing companies during the RIP.
Izvedene so bile prilagoditve vseh stroškov, nastalih med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, vključno s prodajnimi, splošnimi in administrativnimi stroški ter dobičkom, ki so ga v OPP v Skupnosti ustvarile uvozne družbe.
The normal value was compared with the average export price for each type of the product concerned, on an ex-works basis and at the same level of trade.
Opravljena je bila primerjava normalne vrednosti s povprečno izvozno ceno za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki trgovinski ravni.
In accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, and for the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison, differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect price and price comparability were taken into account.
Za zagotovitev poštene primerjave so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, za katere je bilo dokazano, da vplivajo na cene in primerljivost cen.
Adjustments were made for inland and ocean freight, deferred rebates, handling and packaging costs, credit costs and import duties, which were all deducted from the resale prices in order to arrive at an ex-works basis.
Prilagoditve so bile izvedene za notranji in čezmorski prevoz, zbirne popuste, manipulativne stroške in stroške pakiranja, stroške posojil in uvozne dajatve, ki so bili vsi odšteti od cen pri nadaljnji prodaji, da se izračuna cena franko tovarna.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the dumping margin was established per product type on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export prices at the same level of trade.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila stopnja dampinga določena za vsako vrsto izdelka na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami na enaki trgovinski ravni.
This comparison showed the existence of dumping during the RIP, even if at a lower level than established in the previous review.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga v OPP, čeprav na nižji ravni, kot je bila ugotovljena pri prejšnjem pregledu.
The weighted average dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the cif value at the Community frontier was 4,8 % for INEOS and 20,3 % for Dow Chemical.
Tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek vrednosti CIF meja Skupnosti, je znašala 4,8 % za INEOS in 20,3 % za družbo Dow Chemical Company.
Development of imports should measures be repealed
Razvoj uvoza ob razveljavitvi ukrepov
Further to the analysis of the existence of dumping during the RIP, the likelihood of the continuation of dumping was examined.
Po analizi obstoja dampinga v OPP je bila proučena verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga.
Level of dumping in case the measures are repealed
Raven dampinga ob razveljavitvi ukrepov
The removal of the measures would allow exporters to reduce their export prices.
Ukinitev ukrepov bi izvoznikom omogočila znižanje izvoznih cen.
A reduction of export prices would make the US product more attractive on the Community market.
S tem bi izdelek iz ZDA postal privlačnejši na trgu Skupnosti.
If the export prices were reduced commensurate to the level of the duties, the dumping margins observed during the RIP would be 13,4 % for INEOS and 28,3 % for Dow Chemical.
Če bi se izvozne cene znižale sorazmerno z ravnjo dajatev, bi stopnje dampinga, ugotovljene v OPP, znašale 13,4 % za INEOS in 28,3 % za družbo Dow Chemical Company.
Further room for exports to the Community market because of unused US production capacity
Nadaljnje možnosti izvoza na trg Skupnosti zaradi neizkoriščene proizvodne zmogljivosti ZDA
It is estimated that the unused production capacity in the US during the RIP is about 90000 tonnes.
Neizkoriščena proizvodna zmogljivost v ZDA v OPP je ocenjena približno na 90000 ton.
This was calculated on the basis of information from the two cooperating exporting producers as well as information from leading market journals.
To je bilo izračunano na podlagi informacij dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in informacij vodilnih strokovnih publikacij.
Compared to an estimated installed total capacity in the USA of 650000 tonnes, total estimated fulfilled demand and captive use of 560000 tonnes implies a capacity utilisation rate of 86 %, which is rather low given the favourable market conditions during the RIP.
Glede na ocenjeno skupno obstoječo zmogljivost v ZDA v višini 650000 ton pomenita skupno ocenjeno zadovoljeno povpraševanje in lastna uporaba v višini 560000 ton 86-odstotno stopnjo izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, kar je precej nizko glede na ugodne tržne pogoje v OPP.
The relatively low capacity utilisation rate was a consequence of operational problems in certain production facilities.
Razmeroma nizka stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti je bila posledica operativnih težav nekaterih proizvodnih obratov.
The spare capacity of 90000 tonnes should be compared to the volume of exports from the US to the Community during the RIP (41088 tonnes) and total Community consumption (246670 tonnes).
Prosto zmogljivost v višini 90000 ton je treba primerjati z obsegom izvoza iz ZDA v Skupnost v OPP (41088 ton) in skupno potrošnjo Skupnosti (246670 ton).
In other words, there is considerable potential to increase exports from the US and take over a large part of the Community market.
Povedano drugače, obstaja velika možnost za povečanje izvoza iz ZDA in prevzem velikega dela trga Skupnosti.
The propensity of increased exports to the Community is further supported by the 45000 tonnes capacity expansion ongoing in 2006 in Mexico and Brazil, both important export markets for the US producers.
Naklonjenost povečanju izvoza v Skupnost podpira tudi širitev zmogljivosti v višini 45000 ton, zaznana v Mehiki in Braziliji leta 2006, ki sta pomembna izvozna trga za proizvajalce iz ZDA.
To conclude, there is some spare capacity available which could be used to produce more ethanolamine and to sell it on the Community market should measures be lifted.
Na voljo je torej nekaj proste zmogljivosti, ki se lahko uporabi za večjo proizvodnjo etanolamina in za prodajo etanolamina na trgu Skupnosti, če se ukrepi ukinejo.
Evolution of the prices in the Community market and in the exporting country market
Razvoj cen na trgu Skupnosti in na trgu države izvoznice