natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The European Neighbourhood countries should therefore be able to benefit from TAIEX.
Državam evropskega sosedstva bi se moralo zato omogočiti koriščenje TAIEX.
At the 15th EU-Russia Summit on 10 May 2005, the EU and Russia adopted roadmaps for the creation of four common spaces which set out objectives similar to those of the ENP, namely to intensify bilateral cooperation and to pursue regulatory convergence and legislative approximation towards higher standards.
Na 15. vrhu EU–Rusija 10. maja 2005 sta EU in Rusija sprejeli časovni načrt pogajanj za oblikovanje štirih skupnih prostorov, ki določajo cilje, podobne tistim iz ENP, in sicer okrepitev dvostranskega sodelovanja in nadaljnjo konvergenco pravnih ureditev in približevanje zakonodaje višjim standardom.
Russia will be eligible for funding under the future European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI).
Rusija bo upravičena do finančnih sredstev v okviru prihodnjega evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta (ENPI).
Article 54(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [2] (the Financial Regulation) allows for the implementation of the Community budget through centralised indirect management and sets specific requirements for implementation, provided this is authorised by the basic act of the programme.
Člen 54(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [2] (finančna uredba), omogoča izvrševanje proračuna Skupnosti preko posrednega centraliziranega upravljanja in določa posebne zahteve za izvrševanje, če to dovoljuje temeljni akt programa.
A harmonised implementation of the assistance through TAIEX is necessary.
Potrebno je usklajeno izvajanje pomoči preko TAIEX-a.
This Decision should therefore follow the same approach as Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to certain countries of central and eastern Europe [3] (Phare), Council Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000 of 5 December 2000 on assistance for Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [4] (CARDS) and Council Regulation (EC) No 2500/2001 of 17 December 2001 concerning pre-accession financial assistance for Turkey [5].
Zato je treba v tem sklepu zavzeti enak pristop kot v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89 z dne 18. decembra 1989 o gospodarski pomoči nekaterim državam Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope [3] (Phare), Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2666/2000 z dne 5. decembra 2000 o pomoči Albaniji, Bosni in Hercegovini, Hrvaški, Zvezni republiki Jugoslaviji in Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji [4] (CARDS) ter Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2500/2001 z dne 17. decembra 2001 o predpristopni finančni pomoči za Turčijo [5].
The purpose of this Decision is to enable countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy, as well as Russia, particularly those with action plans or roadmaps under implementation, to benefit from assistance through TAIEX, which will provide targeted technical assistance to aid the partner countries in understanding and drafting legislation related to the action plans and to help them with implementation and enforcement.
Cilj tega sklepa je omogočiti državam, vključenim v evropsko sosedsko politiko, in Rusiji, zlasti tistim, za katere se izvajajo akcijski načrti ali časovni načrti pogajanj, koriščenje pomoči TAIEX-a, ki bo zagotovil usmerjeno tehnično pomoč za podporo partnerskim državam pri razumevanju in pripravi pravnih aktov, povezanih z akcijskimi načrti, ter pomoč pri njihovem izvajanju in izvrševanju.
For the purposes of implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1488/96 of 23 July 1996 on financial and technical measures to accompany the reform of economic and social structures in the framework of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (MEDA) [7] and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 99/2000, the Commission may, in accordance with Article 54(2) of the Financial Regulation, decide to entrust tasks of public authority and, in particular, budget implementation tasks following from such decision to the body implementing the TAIEX programme implemented under Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89, Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000 and Regulation (EC) No 2500/2001.Article 3
Za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1488/96 z dne 23. julija 1996 o finančnih in tehničnih ukrepih (MEDA) za spremljanje reforme gospodarskih in socialnih struktur v okviru Evro-sredozemskega partnerstva [7] ter Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 99/2000 lahko Komisija v skladu s členom 54(2) finančne uredbe sklene prenesti naloge javne oblasti in zlasti naloge izvrševanja proračuna iz tega sklepa na organ, pristojen za izvajanje programa TAIEX, ki se izvaja v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3906/89, Uredbo (ES) št. 2666/2000 ter Uredbo (ES) št. 2500/2001.Člen 3
This Decision shall not apply to those parts of actions implemented pursuant to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 99/2000 that fall within the scope of the Euratom Treaty.
Ta sklep se ne uporablja za ukrepe, sprejete ob izvajanju Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 99/2000, ki sodijo v področje uporabe Pogodbe Euratom.
Activities authorised by this Decision shall be financed from budget heading 19 06 01 ‘Assistance to partner countries in eastern Europe and central Asia’, and the associated budget heading for administrative costs 19 01 04 07, and budget heading 19 08 02 01 MEDA (measures to accompany the reforms to the economic and social structures in the Mediterranean non-member countries) and the associated budget heading for administrative costs 19 01 04 06.
Dejavnosti iz tega sklepa se financirajo iz proračunske vrstice 19 06 01 Pomoč partnerskim državam v Vzhodni Evropi in Srednji Aziji ter povezane proračunske vrstice 19 01 04 07 za upravne stroške in proračunske vrstice 19 08 02 01 MEDA (ukrepi, ki spremljajo reforme gospodarskih in socialnih struktur v sredozemskih državah nečlanicah) ter povezane proračunske vrstice 19 01 04 06 za upravne stroške.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2112/2005.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2112/2005.
Part of the actions of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 99/2000 of 29 December 1999 concerning the provision of assistance to the partner States in eastern Europe and central Asia [6] falls within the scope of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom Treaty).
Del ukrepov Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 99/2000 z dne 29. decembra 1999 o zagotavljanju pomoči partnerskim državam v vzhodni Evropi in srednji Aziji [6] sodi v področje uporabe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo („Pogodba Euratom“).
Such parts are not concerned by this Decision,
Ta sklep ne pokriva tega dela –
of 26 November 2003
z dne 26. novembra 2003
on the aid scheme which Italy (Region of Piedmont) is planning to implement for the reduction of airborne pollution in its territory
o programu pomoči ki ga Italija (regija Piemont) namerava izvajati za zmanjšanje onesnaževanja zraka na svojem ozemlju
(notified under document number C(2003) 3520)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2003) 3520)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [1],
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi členi,
By letters dated 16 December 2002, registered by the Commission on 18 December (A/39321), and 20 December 2002, registered on 31 December (A/39483), the Italian authorities notified, pursuant to Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, an aid scheme planned by the Region of Piedmont for the extension of the network of service stations for the sale of natural gas used as motor fuel.
Italijanski organi so v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES z dopisom z dne 16. decembra 2002, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 18. decembra 2002 (A/39321), in dopisom z dne 20. decembra 2002, ki ga je Komisija evidentirala 31. decembra 2002 (A/39483), priglasili program pomoči regije Piemont o razširitvi mreže bencinskih servisov za prodajo zemeljskega plina, ki se uporablja kot pogonsko gorivo.
By letter D/50722 of 3 February 2003, the Commission requested additional information on the notified scheme.
Komisija je v dopisu D/50722 z dne 3. februarja 2003 zahtevala dodatne informacije o priglašenem programu pomoči.
The Italian authorities submitted additional information by letter of 25 March 2003, registered on 28 March (A/32278).
Italijanski organi so predložili dodatne informacije v dopisu A/32278 z dne 25. marca 2003, ki je bil evidentiran 28. marca 2003.
By letter SG(2003) D/229965 dated 28 May 2003, the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the proposed measure.
Komisija je v dopisu SG(2003) D/229965 z dne 28. maja 2003 obvestila Italijo, da se je v zvezi s predlaganim ukrepom odločila sprožiti postopek, predpisan v členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments within the prescribed period (one month), pursuant to Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj v skladu s členom 6(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 predložijo svoje pripombe v predpisanem roku (1 mesec).
The Commission received comments from interested parties on 29 August 2003 (Bundesverband der deutschen Gas- und Wasserwirtschaft e. V. (BGW), Germany), 1 September 2003 (Federal Ministry of Finance, Germany) and 2 September 2003 (OMV Erdgas, Austria).
Komisija je prejela pripombe zainteresiranih strank 29. avgusta 2003 (Bundesverband der deutschen Gas- und Wasserwirtschaft e. V., BGW, Nemčija), 1. septembra 2003 (Zvezno ministrstvo za finance, Nemčija) in 2. septembra 2003 (OMW Erdgas, Avstrija).
Italy’s official response — after two extensions of the deadline had been requested by the Italian authorities on 10 July and 5 August 2003 and granted by the Commission on 7 August 2003 — was submitted by letter of 10 October 2003 (A/37006).
Uradni odgovor Italije je bil – potem ko so italijanski organi dvakrat, 10. julija in 5. avgusta 2003, zaprosili za podaljšanje roka za odgovor in ga je Komisija odobrila 7. avgusta 2003 – poslan z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2003 (A/37006).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE SCHEME
PODROBEN OPIS PROGRAMA
Legal basis and objective of the scheme
Pravna podlaga in cilj programa
The notified aid is based on the following legal provisions:
Priglašena pomoč temelji na naslednjih predpisih:
Principal legislation
Primarna zakonodaja
Decision of the Regional Council (DGR) No 67-7675 of 11 November 2002‘Scheme for the extension of the network for the sale of natural gas used as motor fuel.
Odločba Regionalnega sveta št. 67-7675 z dne 11. novembra 2002„Program o razširitvi mreže za prodajo zemeljskega plina, ki se uporablja kot pogonsko gorivo.
Transfer to the municipalities of funds to be allocated to companies intending to set up service stations for the sale of natural gas used as motor fuel.
Prenos sredstev za dodelitev družbam, ki nameravajo postaviti bencinske servise za prodajo zemeljskega plina, ki se uporablja kot pogonsko gorivo, občinam.
Time limits for the submission of applications and criteria for assessing them’;
Rok za predložitev prošenj in merila za njihovo ocenjevanje.“;
Secondary legislation
Sekundarna zakonodaja
Law No 426 of 9 December 1998‘New measures in the environmental field’;
zakon št. 426 z dne 9. decembra 1998„Novi ukrepi na področju varstva okolja“,
Ministerial Decree of 22 December 2000‘Identification of the national gas pipelines network for the purposes of Article 9 of Legislative Decree No 164 of 23 May 2000’;
ministrska odredba z dne 22. decembra 2000„Določitev nacionalne mreže plinovodov v smislu člena 9 zakonodajne odredbe št. 164 z dne 23. maja 2000“,
Ministerial Decree No 256 of 17 July 1998‘Rules on incentives for motor vehicles powered by natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)’;
ministrska odredba št. 256 z dne 17. julija 1998„Pravila o spodbudah za motorna vozila na pogon z zemeljskim ali utekočinjenim naftnim plinom“;
Ministerial Decree of 28 May 1999‘Grant of loans to local authorities by Cassa Depositi e Prestiti for financing the measures in the environmental field provided for by Law No 426 of 9 December 1998’;
ministrska odredba z dne 28. maja 1999„Odobritev posojil organom lokalnih skupnosti s strani Cassa Depositi e Prestiti za financiranje ukrepov na področju varstva okolja, določenih z zakonom št. 426 z dne 9. decembra 1998“,
Ministerial Decree of 5 April 2001‘Direct grants to members of the public for the purchase of electric vehicles and vehicles powered by natural gas or LPG and for setting up service stations for the sale of natural gas and LPG’;
ministrska odredba z dne 5. aprila 2001„Neposredna nepovratna sredstva za posameznike iz prebivalstva za nakup električnega vozila ali vozila na pogon z zemeljskim plinom ali utekočinjenim naftnim plinom in za postavitev bencinskih servisov, na katerih se bosta prodajala zemeljski plin in utekočinjeni naftni plin“,
Decision of the Regional Council No 13-7622 ‘Extension of the use of natural gas, LPG and other innovative means of propulsion with a low environmental impact in the public service vehicle fleet.
Odločba Regionalnega sveta št. 13-7622 „Širitev uporabe zemeljskega plina, utekočinjenega naftnega plina in drugih inovativnih sredstev v voznih parkih javnih služb za pogon z majhnim vplivom na okolje.
Establishment of allocation criteria and transfer of funds to the Provinces’;
Oblikovanje meril za dodelitev in prenos sredstev v province“,
Decision of the Regional Council No 62-6806 ‘General criteria and arrangements for funding by the Plan for investment in local public transport in Piedmont under Law No 194/98.
Odločba Regionalnega sveta št. 62-6806 „Splošna merila in načini financiranja z Načrtom za naložbe v javni lokalni prevoz v Piemontu v skladu z zakonom št. 194/98.
Allocation to the Regional Transport Directorate of EUR 9009895,07 under heading 25192/2002’.
Dodelitev 9009895,07 EUR Regionalnemu Direktoratu za prevoz pod postavko 25192/2002“.
The scheme concerns the extension of the network of service stations for the distribution of natural gas (methane) used as motor fuel.
Program predvideva razširitev mreže bencinskih servisov za distribucijo zemeljskega plina (metana), ki se uporablja kot pogonsko gorivo.
There are currently only 12 such stations in the territory of Piedmont, compared with 80 in Emilia-Romagna and 64 in Veneto.
Na območju Piemonta trenutno obstaja le 12 takšnih servisov, medtem ko jih je v Emiliji-Romanji 80 in v Benečiji 64.
The number is deemed insufficient to attain the Kyoto target of reducing CO2 emissions — as laid down in national and regional legislation — and to lessen the environmental impact of other hazardous airborne substances by reducing the level of the following pollutants in the region: (a) nitrogen dioxide; (b) fine particulates; (c) benzene.
Teh servisov je premalo za doseganje kjotskega cilja za znižanje emisij CO2 – kot je določeno v nacionalni in regionalni zakonodaji – in zmanjšanje vpliva nevarnih snovi v zraku na okolje v regiji z znižanjem ravni naslednjih onesnaževal: (a) dušikovega dioksida; (b) drobnih delcev; (c) benzena.
These pollutant emissions are a consequence of traffic congestion and the excessive use of a certain mix of traditional motor fuels.
Emisije teh snovi, ki onesnažujejo, so posledica prometnih zastojev in pretirane uporabe določenih mešanic običajnih pogonskih goriv.
For this reason, the Region of Piedmont has focused its action on public and private transport, in terms of both traffic/structure of the vehicle fleet and fuel distribution.
Zato je regija Piemont svoje ukrepe osredotočila na javni in zasebni prevoz, tako v prometu kot sestavi voznega parka in distribuciji goriva.
Form of the measure
Oblika ukrepa
The proposed measure is provided in the form of a grant.
Predlagani ukrep je predviden v obliki nepovratnih sredstev.
Intensity, recipients and eligible costs
Intenzivnost, prejemniki in upravičeni stroški
The grant amounts to EUR 150000 per service station.
Vsak bencinski servis je upravičen do največ 150000 EUR nepovratnih sredstev.
No intensity is indicated.
Intenzivnost ni navedena.
Both the eligible costs and the recipients are described in Section 4 ‘Comments from Italy’.
Upravičeni stroški in prejemniki so opisani v oddelku 4 „Pripombe Italije“.
Budget and duration
Proračun in čas trajanja
In its decision of 28 May 2003 (hereinafter the decision initiating the procedure), the Commission set out the doubts raised by the notified scheme with regard to a number of issues.
Komisija je v svojem sklepu z dne 28. maja 2003 (v nadaljevanju „sklep o sprožitvi postopka“) navedla dvome, ki jih je glede številnih vprašanj sprožil priglašeni program pomoči.
The Commission pointed out that the aid amount exceeded the EUR 100000 maximum that may be granted over a period of three years to any one enterprise under Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid [3] and noted that the Italian authorities did not intend to reduce the planned grants of EUR 150000 per service station, on the ground that the said amount was the minimum incentive needed to spur investments in new service stations in the region.
Komisija je poudarila, da je znesek pomoči presegel najvišji znesek 100000 EUR, ki se ga lahko po Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči de minimis [3] za obdobje treh let dodeli kateri koli pravni ali fizični osebi, in navedla, da italijanski organi niso nameravali znižati načrtovanih nepovratnih sredstev v višini 150000 EUR na bencinski servis, ker je zadevni znesek najmanjša spodbuda, potrebna za pospeševanje vlaganj v nove bencinske servise v regiji.
Distance of the network from intra-Community borders and possible impact of the measure on intra-Community trade as the aid is not de minimis
Dvomi glede razdalje omrežja od meja znotraj Skupnosti in glede morebitnega vpliva ukrepa na trgovino znotraj Skupnosti, ker pomoč ni de minimis
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission noted that, at first sight, trade was potentially affected as natural gas is traded internationally and service stations could be located close to the border.
Komisija je v svojem sklepu o sprožitvi postopka navedla, da na prvi pogled obstaja možnost vpliva na trgovino, saj se z zemeljskim plinom trguje na mednarodnem trgu in bi bencinski servisi lahko stali v bližini meje.
Ownership of the natural gas service stations and identity of the aid recipients
Dvomi glede lastništva bencinskih servisov zemeljskega plina in glede identitete prejemnikov pomoči
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission referred to a previous decision it had taken in a similar case: Decision 1999/705/EC of 20 July 1999 on the State aid implemented by the Netherlands for 633 Dutch service stations located near the German border [4].
Komisija se je v svojem sklepu o sprožitvi postopka sklicevala na prejšnjo odločbo, ki jo je sprejela v podobnem primeru: Odločba 1999/705/ES z dne 20. julija 1999 o državni pomoči Nizozemske za 633 nizozemskih bencinskih servisov, ki stojijo blizu nemške meje [4].
That Decision was subsequently upheld by the Court of Justice in its judgment of 13 June 2002 [5].
Navedeno odločbo je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti nato podprlo v svoji sodbi z dne 13. junija 2002 [5].
Environmental impact of the measure
Vpliv ukrepa na okolje
The Commission stated that in the notification the Italian authorities had not clearly demonstrated that the environmental benefits which the scheme was intended to promote would materialise.
Komisija je izjavila, da italijanski organi v priglasitvi niso jasno dokazali, da se bo ugoden vpliv na okolje, ki naj bi ga program spodbujal, uresničil.
Two points raised by Decision 1999/705/EC and the subsequent Court judgment in Case C-382/99 are especially relevant for the present case.
Za sedanji primer sta posebej pomembni dve točki, ki sta ju izpostavili Odločba 1999/705/ES in posledična sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-382/99.
In its decision initiating the procedure, the Commission stressed the need for correct identification of the ‘recipient’, which could be a person other than and not coinciding with the ‘service station’.
Komisija je v svojem sklepu o sprožitvi postopka poudarila potrebo po pravilni identifikaciji „prejemnika“, ki ni nujno „bencinski servis“ in ne sovpada z njim.
That would be the case, for example, if (a) the same owner possessed or operated several service stations or (b) the same dealer applied for aid more than once.
Tako bi bilo, če (a) bi, na primer, isti lastnik posedoval ali upravljal več bencinskih servisov ali (b) bi isti trgovec zaprosil za pomoč več kot enkrat.
It was quite possible for a large oil company to have de facto control over service station operators by virtue of an exclusive purchasing agreement or any other agreement.
Precej verjetno je, da bi velika naftna družba imela de facto nadzor nad upravljavci bencinskega servisa na podlagi sporazuma o izključni nabavi ali katerega koli drugega sporazuma.
Therefore, in order to verify that there was no incompatible cumulation of aid, the Commission classified service stations in six categories, of which the three most relevant were:
Zato je Komisija, da bi preverila in potrdila, da ne obstaja nezdružljiva kumulacija pomoči, bencinske servise razvrstila v šest kategorij, od katerih so bile naslednje tri najpomembnejše:
dealer-owned/dealer-operated (Do/Do) service stations, where the dealer owns the service station, operates it at his own risk and is linked to the oil company (the supplier) by an exclusive purchasing agreement;
trgovec-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec bencinskega servisa, kjer je trgovec lastnik bencinskega servisa, ga upravlja na lastno odgovornost in je s sporazumom o izključni nabavi povezan z naftno družbo (dobaviteljem);
company-owned/dealer-operated (Co/Do) service stations, where the dealer rents the service station, operates it at his own risk and is linked to the supplier by an exclusive purchasing agreement;
družba-lastnik/trgovec-upravljavec bencinskega servisa, kjer trgovec najame bencinski servis, ga upravlja na lastno odgovornost in je s sporazumom o izključni nabavi povezan z dobaviteljem;
The burden of proving the real ownership of the service stations — and the nature of the contractual agreement linking the supplier to the dealer — lay with the Italian authorities.
Dokazno breme glede resničnega lastništva bencinskih servisov – in narave pogodbenih dogovorov, ki dobavitelja povezujejo s trgovcem – nosijo italijanski organi.
To that end, the Commission submitted two questions to the Italian authorities, with regard to (1) the proposal to amend the scheme so as to bring it into line with all the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 [6] and (2) the ownership structure of the service stations and the size of the recipient enterprises.
Komisija je zato italijanskim organom predložila dve vprašanji v zvezi s (1) predlogom o spremembi programa, da bi ga tako uskladili z vsemi določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 69/2001 [6], in (2) lastniško strukturo bencinskih servisov ter velikostjo podjetij prejemnikov.
In particular, the Commission wanted to know whether some or all of the new stations would be part of any selling network belonging to large companies or multinational oil groups.
Komisija je želela zlasti vedeti, ali bodo nekateri ali vsi novi bencinski servisi del katere koli prodajne mreže v lasti večjih podjetij oziroma multinacionalnih naftnih skupin.