natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States shall, in accordance with paragraph 1, consider the application for asylum as unfounded where the third country is designated as safe pursuant to Article 29.
Države članice v skladu z odstavkom 1 štejejo prošnjo za azil za neutemeljeno, če je tretja država v skladu s členom 29 označena za varno.
Member States shall lay down in national legislation further rules and modalities for the application of the safe country of origin concept.
Države članice v nacionalni zakonodaji določijo nadaljnja pravila in podrobnosti o načinu uporabe koncepta varne izvorne države.
Subsequent application
Naknadne prošnje
Where a person who has applied for asylum in a Member State makes further representations or a subsequent application in the same Member State, that Member State may examine these further representations or the elements of the subsequent application in the framework of the examination of the previous application or in the framework of the examination of the decision under review or appeal, insofar as the competent authorities can take into account and consider all the elements underlying the further representations or subsequent application within this framework.
Kadar oseba, ki je zaprosila za azil v državi članici, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici, lahko ta država članica obravnava te naknadne navedbe ali elemente naknadne prošnje v okviru obravnavanja predhodne prošnje ali v okviru pregleda ali odločanja o pritožbi na odločbo, v kolikor lahko pristojni organi v teh postopkih upoštevajo in obravnavajo vse elemente naknadnih navedb ali naknadnih prošenj.
Moreover, Member States may apply a specific procedure as referred to in paragraph 3, where a person makes a subsequent application for asylum:
Poleg tega lahko države članice uporabijo poseben postopek iz odstavka 3, če oseba vloži naknadno prošnjo za azil:
after his/her previous application has been withdrawn or abandoned by virtue of Articles 19 or 20;
potem ko je bila njena predhodna prošnja umaknjena ali je od nje odstopila v skladu s členoma 19 ali 20;
after a decision has been taken on the previous application.
po izdaji odločbe o predhodni prošnji.
Member States may also decide to apply this procedure only after a final decision has been taken.
Države članice se lahko odločijo tudi, da ta postopek uporabijo šele po izdaji dokončne odločbe.
A subsequent application for asylum shall be subject first to a preliminary examination as to whether, after the withdrawal of the previous application or after the decision referred to in paragraph 2(b) of this Article on this application has been reached, new elements or findings relating to the examination of whether he/she qualifies as a refugee by virtue of Directive 2004/83/EC have arisen or have been presented by the applicant.
Naknadna prošnja za azil je najprej predmet predhodne obravnave o tem, ali so se po umiku predhodne prošnje ali po izdaji odločbe v zvezi s prošnjo iz odstavka 2(b) tega člena pojavili ali bili s strani prosilca navedeni novi elementi ali ugotovitve v zvezi z vprašanjem, ali prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za status begunca v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES.
If, following the preliminary examination referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article, new elements or findings arise or are presented by the applicant which significantly add to the likelihood of the applicant qualifying as a refugee by virtue of Directive 2004/83/EC, the application shall be further examined in conformity with Chapter II.
Če se po predhodni obravnavi iz odstavka 3 tega člena pojavijo ali so s strani prosilca navedeni novi elementi, ki pomembno povečujejo verjetnost, da prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za status begunca v skladu z Direktivo 2004/83/ES, se obravnavanje prošnje nadaljuje v skladu s Poglavjem II.
Member States may, in accordance with national legislation, further examine a subsequent application where there are other reasons why a procedure has to be re-opened.
Države članice lahko v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo nadaljujejo z obravnavanjem naknadne prošnje, kadar obstajajo drugi razlogi, na podlagi katerih je treba primer ponovno odpreti.
Member States may decide to further examine the application only if the applicant concerned was, through no fault of his/her own, incapable of asserting the situations set forth in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of this Article in the previous procedure, in particular by exercising his/her right to an effective remedy pursuant to Article 39.
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da nadaljujejo z obravnavanjem samo, če zadevni prosilec brez svoje krivde v predhodnem postopku ni mogel uveljaviti okoliščin iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5 tega člena, zlasti z uveljavljanjem svoje pravice do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu s členom 39.
The procedure referred to in this Article may also be applicable in the case of a dependant who lodges an application after he/she has, in accordance with Article 6(3), consented to have his/her case be part of an application made on his/her behalf.
Postopek iz tega člena se lahko uporabi tudi v primeru nepreskrbljene osebe, ki vloži prošnjo, potem ko je v skladu s členom 6(3) podala soglasje, da bo njen primer del prošnje, ki je bila vložena v njenem imenu.
In this case the preliminary examination referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article will consist of examining whether there are facts relating to the dependant’s situation which justify a separate application.
V tem primeru se bo v okviru predhodne obravnave iz odstavka 3 tega člena preučilo, ali obstajajo dejstva v zvezi z okoliščinami nepreskrbljene osebe, ki upravičujejo ločeno prošnjo.
Failure to appear
Opustitev zglasitve
Member States may retain or adopt the procedure provided for in Article 32 in the case of an application for asylum filed at a later date by an applicant who, either intentionally or owing to gross negligence, fails to go to a reception centre or appear before the competent authorities at a specified time.
Države članice lahko ohranijo ali sprejmejo postopek iz člena 32 za primere, ko je prosilec, ki se bodisi naklepno bodisi iz velike malomarnosti ob določenem času ni zglasil v sprejemnem centru ali pri pristojnih organih, prošnjo za azil vložil kasneje.
Procedural rules
Postopkovna pravila
Member States shall ensure that applicants for asylum whose application is subject to a preliminary examination pursuant to Article 32 enjoy the guarantees provided for in Article 10(1).
Države članice zagotovijo, da so vsem prosilcem za azil, katerih prošnja je predmet predhodne obravnave v skladu s členom 32, zagotovljena jamstva iz člena 10(1).
Member States may lay down in national law rules on the preliminary examination pursuant to Article 32.
Države članice lahko v nacionalnem pravu določijo pravila o predhodni obravnavi v skladu s členom 32.
Those rules may, inter alia:
Ta pravila lahko med drugim:
oblige the applicant concerned to indicate facts and substantiate evidence which justify a new procedure;
obvezujejo zadevnega prosilca, da navede dejstva in predloži dokaze, ki upravičujejo nov postopek;
require submission of the new information by the applicant concerned within a time-limit after he/she obtained such information;
zahtevajo, da zadevni prosilec predloži nove podatke v določenem roku od trenutka, ko jih je sam pridobil;
permit the preliminary examination to be conducted on the sole basis of written submissions without a personal interview.
dovoljujejo izvedbo predhodne obravnave zgolj na podlagi pisnih navedb brez osebnega razgovora.
The conditions shall not render impossible the access of applicants for asylum to a new procedure or result in the effective annulment or severe curtailment of such access.
Ti pogoji prosilcu za azil ne smejo onemogočiti dostopa do novega postopka, niti ne povzročiti dejanskega izničenja ali resne okrnjenosti tega dostopa.
the applicant is informed in an appropriate manner of the outcome of the preliminary examination and, in case the application will not be further examined, of the reasons for this and the possibilities for seeking an appeal or review of the decision;
je prosilec ustrezno obveščen o izidu predhodne obravnave in, če se prošnja ne bo nadalje obravnavala, o razlogih in možnostih za pritožbo ali preučitev te odločitve;
if one of the situations referred to in Article 32(2) applies, the determining authority shall further examine the subsequent application in conformity with the provisions of Chapter II as soon as possible.
če gre za eno od okoliščin iz člena 32(2), organ za presojo v najkrajšem možnem času nadaljuje z obravnavanjem naknadne prošnje v skladu z določbami Poglavja II.
Border procedures
Postopki na meji
Member States may provide for procedures, in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees of Chapter II, in order to decide at the border or transit zones of the Member State on applications made at such locations.
Države članice lahko v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II predvidijo postopke, v katerih se na mejah ali v tranzitnih območjih države članice odloča o prošnjah, ki so bile vložene na teh krajih.
However, when procedures as set out in paragraph 1 do not exist, Member States may maintain, subject to the provisions of this Article and in accordance with the laws or regulations in force on 1 December 2005, procedures derogating from the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II, in order to decide at the border or in transit zones as to whether applicants for asylum who have arrived and made an application for asylum at such locations, may enter their territory.
Vendar lahko, kadar postopki iz odstavka 1 niso predvideni, države članice ob upoštevanju določb tega člena in v skladu z zakoni in drugimi predpisi, ki so v veljavi dne 1. decembra 2005, ohranijo postopke, ki odstopajo od temeljnih načel in jamstev iz Poglavja II, v katerih se na meji ali na tranzitnih območjih odloča o tem, ali se prosilcem za azil, ki se nahajajo na teh krajih in so tam vložili prošnjo za azil, dovoli vstop na njihovo ozemlje.
The procedures referred to in paragraph 2 shall ensure in particular that the persons concerned:
S postopki iz odstavka 2 se predvsem zagotovi, da se:
are allowed to remain at the border or transit zones of the Member State, without prejudice to Article 7;
zadevnim osebam brez poseganja v člen 7 dovoli, da ostanejo na meji ali tranzitnih območjih države članice;
are be immediately informed of their rights and obligations, as described in Article 10(1) (a);
zadevne osebe takoj obvesti o njihovih pravicah in obveznostih, kot je navedeno v členu 10(1)(a);
have access, if necessary, to the services of an interpreter, as described in Article 10(1)(b);
zadevnim osebam omogoči dostop, če je to potrebno, do storitev tolmačenja, kot je navedeno v členu 10(1)(b);
are interviewed, before the competent authority takes a decision in such procedures, in relation to their application for asylum by persons with appropriate knowledge of the relevant standards applicable in the field of asylum and refugee law, as described in Articles 12, 13 and 14;
preden pristojni organ odloči v takšnih postopkih zadevnim osebam omogoči razgovor v zvezi z njihovo prošnjo za azil, ki ga vodijo osebe s primernim znanjem o ustreznih standardih, ki se uporabljajo na področju azilnega in begunskega prava, kot je navedeno v členih 12, 13 in 14;
can consult a legal adviser or counsellor admitted or permitted as such under national law, as described in Article 15(1); and
zadevnim osebam omogoči posvetovanje s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem, ki ga kot takšnega priznava in dopušča nacionalno pravo, kot je navedeno v členu 15(1); in
have a representative appointed in the case of unaccompanied minors, as described in Article 17(1), unless Article 17(2) or (3) applies.
zadevnim osebam omogoči, da imajo zastopnika, imenovanega v primerih mladoletnikov brez spremstva, kot je navedeno v členu 17(1), razen če se uporablja člen 17(2) ali (3).
Moreover, in case permission to enter is refused by a competent authority, this competent authority shall state the reasons in fact and in law why the application for asylum is considered as unfounded or as inadmissible.
Poleg tega, kadar pristojni organ ne dovoli vstopa, ta pristojni organ navede dejanske in pravne razloge, zakaj se prosilčeva prošnja za azil šteje za neutemeljeno ali nedopustno.
Member States shall ensure that a decision in the framework of the procedures provided for in paragraph 2 is taken within a reasonable time.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se v postopkih iz odstavka 2 odloči v razumnem roku.
When a decision has not been taken within four weeks, the applicant for asylum shall be granted entry to the territory of the Member State in order for his/her application to be processed in accordance with the other provisions of this Directive.
Če ni odločeno v štirih tednih, se prosilcu za azil dovoli vstop na ozemlje države članice, da bi se njegovo prošnjo obravnavalo v skladu z ostalimi določbami te direktive.
In the event of particular types of arrivals, or arrivals involving a large number of third country nationals or stateless persons lodging applications for asylum at the border or in a transit zone, which makes it practically impossible to apply there the provisions of paragraph 1 or the specific procedure set out in paragraphs 2 and 3, those procedures may also be applied where and for as long as these third country nationals or stateless persons are accommodated normally at locations in proximity to the border or transit zone.
V primeru izjemnih prihodov ali prihodov, pri katerih gre za veliko število državljanov tretje države ali oseb brez državljanstva, ki vložijo prošnje za azil na meji ali na tranzitnih območjih, zaradi česar je praktično nemogoče izvajati določbe iz odstavka 1 ali poseben postopek iz odstavkov 2 in 3, je navedene postopke mogoče izvajati tudi kadar in kolikor časa so ti državljani tretje države in osebe brez državljanstva normalno nastanjeni v bližini meje ali tranzitnega območja.
The European safe third countries concept
Koncept evropske varne tretje države
Member States may provide that no, or no full, examination of the asylum application and of the safety of the applicant in his/her particular circumstances as described in Chapter II, shall take place in cases where a competent authority has established, on the basis of the facts, that the applicant for asylum is seeking to enter or has entered illegally into its territory from a safe third country according to paragraph 2.
Države članice lahko predvidijo, da se, kadar pristojni organ na podlagi dejstev ugotovi, da prosilec poskuša nezakonito vstopiti ali da je nezakonito vstopil na ozemlje države članice iz varne tretje države iz odstavka 2, ne opravi obravnavanje ali ne opravi celovito obravnavanje prošnje za azil in varnosti prosilca glede na njegove osebne okoliščine, kot je navedeno v Poglavju II.
A third country can only be considered as a safe third country for the purposes of paragraph 1 where:
Za namene odstavka 1 se tretja država lahko šteje za varno tretjo državo samo, če:
it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations;
je ratificirala in spoštuje določbe Ženevske konvencije brez kakršnih koli geografskih omejitev;
it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law;
ima z zakonom predpisan azilni postopek;
it has ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and observes its provisions, including the standards relating to effective remedies; and
je ratificirala Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter spoštuje njene določbe, vključno s standardi za učinkovita pravna sredstva; in
it has been so designated by the Council in accordance with paragraph 3.
jo za varno označi Svet v skladu z odstavkom 3.
The Council shall, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament, adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Svet na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom s kvalificirano večino sprejme ali spremeni skupen seznam tretjih držav, ki se štejejo za varne tretje države za namene odstavka 1.
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and the consequences of decisions pursuant to those provisions in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement under the Geneva Convention, including providing for exceptions from the application of this Article for humanitarian or political reasons or for reasons of public international law.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja po Ženevski konvenciji določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in posledice odločb na podlagi teh določb, vključno z določitvijo izjem pri izvajanju tega člena zaradi humanitarnih ali političnih razlogov ali razlogov v zvezi z mednarodnim javnim pravom.
When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, the Member States concerned shall:
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice:
Where the safe third country does not re-admit the applicant for asylum, Member States shall ensure that access to a procedure is given in accordance with the basic principles and guarantees described in Chapter II.
Kadar varna tretja država prosilca za azil ne sprejme ponovno, države članice zagotovijo dostopnost postopka v skladu s temeljnimi načeli in jamstvi iz Poglavja II.
Member States which have designated third countries as safe countries in accordance with national legislation in force on 1 December 2005 and on the basis of the criteria in paragraph 2(a), (b) and (c), may apply paragraph 1 to these third countries until the Council has adopted the common list pursuant to paragraph 3.
Države članice, ki so v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, ki je bila v veljavi dne 1. decembra 2005, in na podlagi meril iz odstavka 2(a), (b) in (c) tretje države označile za varne tretje države, lahko odstavek 1 uporabljajo za te tretje države, dokler Svet ne sprejme skupnega seznama v skladu z odstavkom 3.
PROCEDURES FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OF REFUGEE STATUS
POSTOPKI ZA ODVZEM STATUSA BEGUNCA
Withdrawal of refugee status
Odvzem statusa begunca
Member States shall ensure that an examination to withdraw the refugee status of a particular person may commence when new elements or findings arise indicating that there are reasons to reconsider the validity of his/her refugee status.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se lahko postopek odvzema statusa begunca določeni osebi začne, kadar se pojavijo novi elementi ali ugotovitve, ki kažejo, da je treba veljavnost statusa begunca ponovno preučiti.
Member States shall ensure that, where the competent authority is considering withdrawing the refugee status of a third country national or stateless person in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2004/83/EC, the person concerned shall enjoy the following guarantees:
Države članice zagotovijo, da so, kadar pristojni organ preučuje možnost odvzema statusa begunca državljanu tretje države ali osebi brez državljanstva v skladu s členom 14 Direktive 2004/83/ES, tej osebi zagotovljena naslednja jamstva:
to be informed in writing that the competent authority is reconsidering his or her qualification for refugee status and the reasons for such a reconsideration; and
pisno obvestilo, da pristojni organ ponovno preučuje, ali je upravičena do statusa begunca, in o razlogih za takšno preučevanje; in
to be given the opportunity to submit, in a personal interview in accordance with Article 10(1)(b) and Articles 12, 13 and 14 or in a written statement, reasons as to why his/her refugee status should not be withdrawn.
možnost, da na osebnem razgovoru v skladu s členom 10(1)(b) ter členi 12, 13 in 14 ali v pisni izjavi navede razloge, zakaj ji status begunca ne bi smel biti odvzet.
In addition, Member States shall ensure that within the framework of such a procedure:
Poleg tega države članice zagotovijo, da v okviru takšnega postopka:
the competent authority is able to obtain precise and up-to-date information from various sources, such as, where appropriate, from the UNHCR, as to the general situation prevailing in the countries of origin of the persons concerned; and
pristojni organ lahko pridobi točne in ažurne podatke o splošnih razmerah, ki vladajo v izvornih državah zadevnih oseb, iz različnih virov, kot je npr., kadar je to primerno, UNHCR; in
where information on an individual case is collected for the purposes of reconsidering the refugee status, it is not obtained from the actor(s) of persecution in a manner that would result in such actor(s) being directly informed of the fact that the person concerned is a refugee whose status is under reconsideration, nor jeopardise the physical integrity of the person and his/her dependants, or the liberty and security of his/her family members still living in the country of origin.
pri zbiranju podatkov o posameznem primeru ponovne preučitve statusa begunca se podatki od zatrjevanih subjektov preganjanja ne pridobivajo tako, da bi bili ti subjekti neposredno obveščeni, da je zadevna oseba begunec, kar bi ogrozilo telesno integriteto te osebe in njenih nepreskrbljenih oseb ali svobodo in varnost njegovih družinskih članov, ki še vedno živijo v izvorni državi.
Member States shall ensure that the decision of the competent authority to withdraw the refugee status is given in writing.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se odločba pristojnega organa o odvzemu statusa begunca izda v pisni obliki.
The reasons in fact and in law shall be stated in the decision and information on how to challenge the decision shall be given in writing.
Odločba vsebuje obrazložitev dejanskih in pravnih razlogov zanjo ter pisni pouk o tem, kako jo je mogoče izpodbijati.
Once the competent authority has taken the decision to withdraw the refugee status, Article 15, paragraph 2, Article 16, paragraph 1 and Article 21 are equally applicable.
V primeru, da pristojni organ izda odločbo o odvzemu statusa begunca, se prav tako uporabljajo členi 15(2), 16(1) in 21.
By derogation to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, Member States may decide that the refugee status shall lapse by law in case of cessation in accordance with Article 11(1)(a) to (d) of Directive 2004/83/EC or if the refugee has unequivocally renounced his/her recognition as a refugee.
Brez poseganja v odstavke 1, 2 in 3 tega člena se države članice lahko odločijo, da status begunca ugasne po samem zakonu v primeru prenehanja v skladu s členom 11(1)(a) do (d) Direktive 2004/83/ES ali če se je begunec nedvoumno odpovedal priznanemu statusu begunca.
APPEALS PROCEDURES
PRITOŽBENI POSTOPKI
The right to an effective remedy
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva
Member States shall ensure that applicants for asylum have the right to an effective remedy before a court or tribunal, against the following:
Države članice zagotovijo, da ima prosilec za azil pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred sodiščem zoper:
a decision taken on their application for asylum, including a decision:
odločbo, izdano v zvezi z njegovo prošnjo za azil, vključno z odločbo:
to consider an application inadmissible pursuant to Article 25(2),
o tem, da je prošnja v skladu s členom 25(2) nedopustna;
taken at the border or in the transit zones of a Member State as described in Article 35(1),
na meji ali tranzitnih območjih države članice, kot je navedena v členu 35(1);
not to conduct an examination pursuant to Article 36;
o tem, da se v skladu s členom 36 obravnavanje ne opravi;
a refusal to re-open the examination of an application after its discontinuation pursuant to Articles 19 and 20;
zavrnitev ponovnega odprtja obravnavanja prošnje po njegovi prekinitvi v skladu s členoma 19 in 20;
a decision not to further examine the subsequent application pursuant to Articles 32 and 34;
odločbo v skladu s členoma 32 in 34, da se naknadna prošnja ne bo obravnavala;
a decision refusing entry within the framework of the procedures provided for under Article 35(2);
odločbo o prepovedi vstopa v okviru postopkov, določenih v členu 35(2);
a decision to withdraw of refugee status pursuant to Article 38.
odločbo o odvzemu statusa begunca v skladu s členom 38.