natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This issue was examined carefully in order to determine whether the application of the provisions set out in Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation was warranted in the present case.
To vprašanje je bilo temeljito preučeno, zato da je bilo mogoče določiti, ali je uporaba določb, navedenih v členu 2(9) osnovne uredbe, v zadevnem primeru upravičena.
An analysis was carried out on the prices charged to the related importer by the Korean exporting producer.
Izvedena je bila analiza cen, ki jih je povezanemu uvozniku zaračunal korejski proizvajalec-izvoznik.
It was found that these prices were consistently sold at the same level as those charged to unrelated importers during the investigation period.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so bile v času OP te cene vedno na enakem nivoju kot cene, zaračunane nepovezanim uvoznikom.
Under these circumstances, it was considered that the prices between the related parties were at arms-length and reliable.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile cene med povezanimi strankami na dosegu roke in zanesljive.
Therefore, since export prices were reliable, there was no need to recur to the provisions set out in Article 2(9) of the Basic Regulation and to conclude on the relationship between the companies.
Ker so bile izvozne cene torej zanesljive, ni bilo potrebe po uporabi določb, navedenih v členu 2(9) osnovne uredbe, in sklepanju o razmerju med obema družbama.
Therefore, in the case of this exporting producer, the export price was based on the prices paid or payable by all customers in the Community.
Zato je v primeru tega proizvajalca-izvoznika izvozna cena temeljila na cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani vseh strank v Skupnosti.
For the two other exporting producers, the export price was based on the prices paid or payable by unrelated customers in the Community.
Za dva preostala proizvajalca-izvoznika pa je cena temeljila na cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani nepovezanih strank v Skupnosti.
To ensure a fair comparison, allowances were made for differences in import charges and indirect taxes, duties, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, bank charges, credit costs and commissions where applicable and justified.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bila izvedena nadomestila za razlike v uvoznih dajatvah, posrednih davkih, dajatvah, prevozu, zavarovanju, rokovanju, nalaganju, pomožnih stroških, stroških pakiranja, bančnih stroških, kreditnih stroških in provizijah, kjer je to veljavno in upravičeno.
All three exporting producers made a claim for duty drawback on the grounds that import charges were borne by the like product when intended for consumption in the exporting country but were refunded when the product was sold for export to the Community.
Vsi trije proizvajalci-izvozniki so vložili zahtevek za povračilo dajatev na podlagi tega, da so uvozne dajatve šle v breme podobnega izdelka, če je bil namenjen za porabo v izvozni državi, a so bile povrnjene, če je bil izdelek prodan za izvoz v Skupnost.
In each case the amount claimed was found to be higher than the amount of duty borne by the like product in the domestic market and therefore, the allowances were adjusted accordingly.
V vsakem primeru je bilo ugotovljeno, da je navedeni znesek višji od zneska dajatve, ki gre v breme podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu, zato so bila nadomestila ustrezno prilagojena.
After disclosure two companies objected to the methodology applied concerning the adjustment for duty drawback, partly on the grounds that it was different to the one used in the original investigation.
Po razkritju sta dve družbi nasprotovali metodologiji, uporabljeni v zvezi s prilagoditvijo na povračilo dajatev, delno zato, ker je bila drugačna od metodologije, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi.
They claimed that the methodology used in their replies to the questionnaire should be applied instead.
Trdili sta, da naj bi se namesto tega uporabila metodologija, ki sta jo uporabili v odgovorih na vprašalnike.
The calculation method used by the companies, similar to the one used in the original investigation, was found to not reflect the actual import level of duties borne by the like product.
Metoda izračuna, ki sta jo uporabili družbi, je podobna tisti, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi, a ne odraža dejanske stopnje uvoza dajatev, ki gredo v breme podobnega izdelka.
It was therefore not in line with the requirements of Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation and had to be rejected.
Metoda zato ni bila v skladu z zahtevami člena 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe in je bila zavrnjena.
The methodology used in the present investigation was compatible with the conditions set out in Article 2(10)(b) insofar as it accurately reflected the actual import level of duties borne by the like product and was therefore considered as the most appropriate and thus maintained.
Metoda, uporabljena v tej preiskavi, je bila skladna z zahtevami člena 2(10)(b), zato šteje kot najprimernejša in se ohrani.
In addition, all three exporting producers claimed credit costs on the basis of the actual credit period taken by customers under the ‘open account’ payment system used on the Korean domestic market.
Vsi trije proizvajalci-izvozniki so zahtevali tudi kreditne stroške na podlagi dejanskega kreditnega obdobja, ki so ga imele stranke v okviru plačilnega sistema „odprti račun“, ki se uporablja na korejskem domačem trgu.
It was found that under such a system, generally, the exporting producers did not actually grant specific credit periods and furthermore, the credit periods taken could not be accurately determined, as receipts could not be linked to specific invoices.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da proizvajalci-izvozniki v okviru takšnega sistema, v splošnem, dejansko niso odobrili specifičnih kreditnih obdobij in nadalje, da kreditnih obdobij ni bilo mogoče natančno določiti, saj prejemkov ni bilo mogoče povezati s posameznimi računi.
In these circumstances, these allowances could not be granted.
V takšnih okoliščinah teh nadomestil ni bilo mogoče odobriti.
After disclosure, two companies claimed that the fact that they use an open account system is not in itself a reason to refuse the adjustment for credit costs.
Po razkritju sta dve družbi trdili, da dejstvo, da uporabljata odprti računovodski sistem, ni samo po sebi vzrok, da se zavrne prilagoditev za kreditne stroške.
However, the investigation has shown that there was no consistent relation between prices and the credit terms reported.
Raziskava pa je pokazala, da med cenami in navedenimi kreditnimi pogoji ni bilo ustrezne povezave.
The companies could not demonstrate that specific credit terms were agreed with the customer prior to the sale and that they had an effect on prices and price comparability.
Ni bilo mogoče pokazati, da je družba s stranko pred prodajo dosegla posebne kreditne pogoje in da so ti pogoji zato imeli vpliv na cene in njihovo primerljivost.
The exporting producers' claims had therefore to be rejected.
Zahteve proizvajalca-izvoznika so bile zato zavrnjene.
One exporting producer requested an adjustment for differences in the level of trade either in accordance with Article 2(10)(k) (‘other factors’) or Article 2(10)(d)(ii) of the Basic Regulation.
En proizvajalec-izvoznik je v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe zahteval prilagoditev za druge dejavnike zato, ker sta bili izvozna in domača prodaja izvedeni na različnih ravneh trgovine, kar je vplivalo na primerljivost cen.
Indeed, it was claimed that domestic sales were done mainly to end users, while export sales to the Community were mainly done to distributors.
Trdil je, da je bila domača prodaja v glavnem namenjena končnim porabnikom, medtem ko je bila izvozna prodaja v Skupnost v glavnem namenjena distributerjem.
Although there were sales to different levels of trade on the domestic market (end users and distributors), the company was not able to quantify the appropriate adjustment.
Ker družba ni mogla ovrednotiti ustrezne prilagoditve, je zahtevek temeljil na členu 2(10)(d)(ii), namesto na 2(10)(d)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The company claimed later that the adjustment should be based on the difference of prices charged on the domestic market to end users and to distributors.
Družba je kasneje trdila, da bi morala prilagoditev temeljiti na razliki med cenami, zaračunanimi končnim uporabnikom na domačem trgu, in cenami, zaračunanimi distributerjem.
However, the company was not in a position to demonstrate the existence of any such consistent and distinct difference in prices.
Družba pa ni bila zmožna dokazati obstoja kakršne koli dosledne in razločne razlike v cenah.
Therefore, it was not possible to conclude that the difference in the level of trade affected price comparability and consequently this claim had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče skleniti, da je razlika v ravneh trgovine vplivala na primerljivost cen, in na podlagi tega je zahtevek bil zavrnjen.
One exporting producer claimed that an adjustment for differences in physical characteristics was warranted on the basis of differences in the denier and lustre between product types.
En proizvajalec je trdil, da je zaradi razlik v denu in lesku med tipi izdelka upravičen do prilagoditve za razlike v fizičnih lastnostih.
However, the company could not substantiate that the difference in the denier and lustre affected price or price comparability and this claim had consequently to be rejected.
Družba pa ni mogla dokazati, da so razlike v denu in lesku vplivale na cene ali primerljivost cen, zato je bil ta zahtevek zavrnjen.
The comparison of the weighted average normal value with the weighted average export price by product type on an ex-factory basis for two of the exporting producers showed the existence of dumping.
Primerjava tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno po tipih izdelka, na podlagi cene franko tovarna proizvajalcev-izvoznikov, je pokazala obstoj dampinga.
Moreover, with regard to one exporting producer, it should be noted that export prices on the last month of the IP (‘the second time period’) were found to be in general and on average higher than those charged in the period before that month (‘the first time period’).
V zvezi z enim proizvajalcem-izvoznikom je treba opozoriti, da so bile izvozne cene v zadnjem mesecu OP („drugo časovno obdobje“) v splošnem in v povprečju višje kot cene, zaračunane v obdobju pred tem mesecem („prvo časovno obdobje“).
While export prices during the second time period were high and mostly at non-dumped levels, significant dumping was practised in the first period as export prices were lower.
Medtem ko so bile izvozne cene v drugem časovnem obdobju visoke in večinoma na stopnji, ki več ne pomeni dampinga, se je damping v širokem obsegu izvajal v prvem obdobju, ko so izvozne cene bile nižje.
Thus, there was a pattern of export prices which differed significantly between the first and the second time period of the IP.
Zato se je vzorec izvoznih cen zelo razlikoval glede na prvo in drugo časovno obdobje OP.
Furthermore, it was found that a comparison made on an average-to-average basis would not reflect the significant dumping being practised in the first time period of the IP, as that method would not enable significant differences in the pattern of export prices between the first and the second time period of the IP to be taken appropriately into account.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da primerjava na podlagi povprečij ne bi odražala dampinga, ki se je v širokem obsegu izvajal v prvem časovnem obdobju OP, saj ta metoda ne bi ustrezno upoštevala velikih razlik v vzorcih izvoznih cen med prvim in drugim časovnim obdobjem OP.
Therefore, and in view of the findings referred to under recital (134), it was concluded that the weighted average normal value should be compared to prices of all individual export transactions in accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, in order to reflect the full degree of dumping being practised.
Zato in zaradi ugotovitev, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi (134), je bilo sklenjeno, da se tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerja s cenami vseh posameznih izvoznih poslov v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe, zato da se pokaže celoten obseg dampinga, ki se izvaja.
For the reasons set out in recital (44) a comparison of individual normal values and individual export prices on a transaction-by-transaction basis was not possible.
Iz razlogov, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi (44), primerjava posameznih normalnih vrednosti in posameznih izvoznih cen na podlagi poslov ni bila možna.
Indeed, since the exporting producer concerned only issued one invoice per month and per customer, it was not possible to find a reasonable matching between individual export transactions and individual domestic sales transactions.
Ker je en proizvajalec-izvoznik izdal samo en račun na mesec na stranko, jasnega ujemanja med posameznimi izvoznimi posli in posameznimi posli v domači prodaji ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti.
Thus, the comparison would have required making averages between prices for the same month (which would then not constitute a transaction-to-transaction comparison), or to proceed to arbitrary choices of the export price to be chosen for comparison.
V večini primerov bi ta primerjava zahtevala izdelavo povprečij med cenami za isti mesec (kar posledično ne bi predstavljalo primerjave na podlagi poslov) ali poljubno izbiro izvozne cene, ki bi jo izbrali za primerjavo.
The exporting producer for which the weighted average normal value was compared to prices of all individual export transactions challenged this methodology.
Proizvajalec-izvoznik, za katerega se je tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerjala s cenami vseh posameznih izvoznih transakcij, je nasprotoval tej metodologiji.
Indeed, the company claimed that there is an economic justification for these limited number of transactions made at non-dumped prices in the last month of the IP, and therefore it is not justified to consider that a pattern of export prices by time period existed.
Družba je trdila, da je omejeno število transakcij, izvedenih po nedampinških cenah v zadnjem mesecu OP, gospodarsko upravičeno, zato ni upravičeno domnevati, da je v tistem obdobju obstajal vzorec izvoznih cen.
However, it is to be noted that the economic justification of these invoices — irrespective of whether or not such a justification is relevant in this context — could not be verified with the final customer which did not cooperate during the investigation.
Opozoriti pa je treba, da gospodarske upravičenosti teh računov – ne glede na to, ali je takšno upravičenje v tem pogledu pomembno ali ne – ni bilo mogoče preveriti pri končni stranki.
In addition, the claim by the exporting producer that there is an economic justification for this limited number of transactions is in contradiction with information provided by the company itself, which claimed during the investigation that price compensation had taken place after the IP.
Nadalje, trditev proizvajalca-izvoznika, da je omejeno število transakcij gospodarsko upravičeno, je v protislovju s podatki, ki jih je predložila družba sama, saj je v času preiskave trdila, da je do kompenzacije cen prišlo po OP.
Moreover, the dumping margin for the company on a weighted average to weighted average basis for the eleven months of the IP (excluding December), and for the first semester of the IP, resulted in similar levels to the one found when using the weighted average to transaction methodology for the whole IP.
Stopnja dampinga družbe na podlagi tehtanih povprečjih za enajst mesecev OP (brez decembra) in za prvi semester OP je bila podobna kot takrat, ko se je za celoten OP uporabljala metodologija tehtanih povprečij po transakcijah.
Given the above, the methodology of comparing the weighted average normal value to the prices of all individual export transactions is appropriate in this case.
Glede na zgoraj omenjeno je metodologija primerjanja tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s cenami vseh posameznih izvoznih transakcij v tem primeru ustrezna.
For cooperating companies not included in the sample, the dumping margin was established on the basis of a weighted average dumping margin calculated for the companies selected in the sample.
Za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, je bila izračunana tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga družb, ki so bile vključene v vzorcu.
For this purpose, Sung Lim Co., Ltd., whose dumping margin is de minimis, was not considered, in accordance with Article 9(6) of the Basic Regulation.
Zato v skladu s členom 9(6) osnovne uredbe ni bila všteta družba Sung Lim Co. Ltd., katere stopnja dampinga je de minimis.
The dumping margins established, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, are the following:
Ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene na meji Skupnosti CIF, carina neplačana, so sledeče:
Huvis Corporation, Seoul 5,7 %,
Huvis Corporation, Seul 5,7 %,
Saehan Industries Inc., Seoul 10,6 %,
Saehan Industries Inc., Seul 10,6 %,
Cooperating companies not included in the sample 6,0 %,
sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec 6 %,
All other companies 10,6 %.
vse druge družbe 10,6 %.
Questionnaire replies were received from the two exporting producers selected in the sample.
Odgovore na vprašalnik sta poslala dva proizvajalca-izvoznika, izbrana v vzorcu.
Both exporting producers initially submitted data for all products containing polyester.
Oba proizvajalca-izvoznika sta sprva predložila podatke za vse izdelke, ki vsebujejo poliester.
However, since the present review concerns only synthetic staple fibres of polyester, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning which are currently classifiable within CN code 55032000 (i.e. with 50 % or more of polyester), all products that were declared by the exporting producers as containing less than 50 % of polyester were disregarded.
Ker pa trenutni pregled zadeva samo sintetična rezana vlakna iz poliestra, nemikana, nečesana in ne drugače pripravljena za predenje, ki se trenutno uvrščajo pod oznako KN 55032000 (tj. s 50 % ali več poliestra), so se upoštevali samo izdelki, ki sta jih proizvajalca-izvoznika označila, da imajo 50 % ali več poliestra.
For both exporting producers, sales of the like product were representative.
Za oba proizvajalca-izvoznika je bila prodaja podobnega izdelka reprezentativna.
To a large extent, normal value was based on prices paid or payable, in the ordinary course of trade, by independent customers in Taiwan, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the Basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost je v veliki meri temeljila na cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani neodvisnih strank v običajnem poteku trgovine v Tajvanu v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
However, for those product types where the domestic sales were insufficient or not made in the ordinary course of trade, normal value was constructed in accordance with Article 2(3) of the Basic Regulation, as explained in recital (34).
Za tiste tipe izdelka, kjer domača prodaja ni bila zadostna ali se ni izvajala v običajnem poteku trgovine, pa je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, kot je razloženo v uvodni izjavi (34).
SG&A and profit were based on actual data pertaining to production and sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of the like product, by the exporting producer under investigation, in accordance with the chapeau of Article 2(6) of the Basic Regulation.
PS&A in dobiček so v skladu z uvodom člena 2(6) osnovne uredbe temeljili na dejanskih podatkih za proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka, ki jo je proizvajalec-izvoznik v preiskavi izvajal v običajnem poteku trgovine.
For both exporting producers export prices were established on the basis of the prices actually paid by unrelated customers in the Community in accordance with Article 2(8) of the Basic Regulation.
Izvozne cene za oba proizvajalca-izvoznika so bile v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe določene na podlagi cen, ki so jih nepovezane stranke v Skupnosti dejansko plačale.
To ensure a fair comparison, allowances were made for differences in transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing costs, bank charges, rebates, discounts, credit costs and commissions where applicable and justified.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bila izvedena nadomestila za razlike v prevozu, zavarovanju, rokovanju, nalaganju, pomožnih stroških, stroških pakiranja, bančnih stroških, kreditnih stroških in provizijah, kjer je to veljavno in upravičeno.
The weighted average normal value per type of PSF was compared to the weighted average export price of the corresponding type, in accordance with Article 2(11) of the Basic Regulation, on an ex-work basis and at the same level of trade.
Tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost po tipih RVP se je v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe primerjala s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno ustreznega tipa na podlagi cene franko in na isti ravni trgovine.
The comparison showed the existence of dumping for the two Taiwanese exporting producers investigated, the dumping margin being equal to the amount by which normal value, so established, exceeded the price for export to the Community.
Primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga za oba tajvanska proizvajalca-izvoznika v preiskavi, pri čemer je bila stopnja dampinga enaka količini, za katero je tako določena normalna vrednost presegala ceno izvoza v Skupnost.
The dumping margins established, expressed as a percentage of the CIF import price at the Community frontier duty unpaid are the following:
Ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene na meji Skupnosti CIF, carina neplačana, so sledeče:
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Taipei 1,7 %,
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, Tajpej 1,7 %,
Far Eastern Textile Ltd., Taipei 1,8 %.
Far Eastern Textile Ltd., Tajpej 1,8 %.
Since both dumping margins are de minimis, i.e. less than 2 %, and in accordance with the Commission's consistent practice, the proceeding against Taiwan should be terminated without the imposition of measures, should the circumstances that led to these results be considered as lasting.
Ker sta obe stopnji dampinga de minimis, tj. manj kot 2 %, in v skladu s stalno prakso Komisije, se postopek proti Tajvanu zaključi brez uvedbe ukrepov, pod pogojem, da se okoliščine, ki so pripeljale do teh sklepov, obravnavajo kot trajne.
LASTING NATURE OF THE CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION/RECURRENCE OF INJURIOUS DUMPING
TRAJNA NARAVA SPREMENJENIH OKOLIŠČIN IN VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA/PONOVITVE ŠKODLJIVEGA DAMPINGA
In the framework of the interim review concerning Taiwan and the Republic of Korea, it was also examined whether the changed circumstances with respect to the original investigation regarding dumping and injury could reasonably be considered to be of a lasting nature in accordance with Article 11(3) of the Basic Regulation.
Komisija je v okviru vmesnega pregleda v zvezi s Tajvanom in Republiko Korejo pregledala tudi, ali je spremenjene okoliščine v zvezi s prvotno preiskavo glede dampinga in povzročanja škode razumno obravnavati, kot da so trajne narave v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
Moreover, with regard to Taiwan and in accordance with Article 11(7) of the Basic Regulation, it was also examined whether it was likely that dumping would continue or recur should measures be repealed.
V zvezi s Tajvanom in v skladu s členom 11(7) osnovne uredbe je pregledala tudi, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo damping nadaljeval oziroma ponovil, če se ukrepi prekličejo.
As mentioned above, the current investigation showed the existence of dumping for two of the three exporting producers selected in the sample, albeit at a lower level than in the original investigation.
Trenutna preiskava je, kot je omenjeno zgoraj, pokazala obstoj dampinga za dva od treh proizvajalcev-izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorcu, čeprav na nižji stopnji kot v prvotni preiskavi.
With regard to the third exporting producer, as in the original investigation, dumping was found at a de minimis level.
V zvezi s tretjim proizvajalcem-izvoznikom je bila stopnja dampinga, kot v prvotni preiskavi, na de minimis stopnji.