natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of Malaysia and Thailand, where the level of cooperation was low, i.e. less than 80 %, it was considered appropriate to set the dumping margin for the non-cooperating exporting producers at a level higher than the highest dumping margin established for the cooperating exporting producers.
V primeru Malezije in Tajske, kjer je bila raven sodelovanja nizka, tj. manj kot 80 %, se je zdelo primerno, da se za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike ustrezno določi stopnja dampinga na ravni, ki je višja od najvišje stopnje dampinga, določene za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike.
Indeed, there is reason to believe that the low level of cooperation results from the non-cooperating exporting producers in the investigated country generally having dumped at a higher level than any cooperating exporting producer.
Vsekakor obstaja razlog za prepričanje, da je nizka raven nesodelovanja posledica dejstva, da so nesodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki v preiskovani državi na splošno izvajali damping na višji ravni kot kateri koli sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik.
Moreover, there were no indications that any non-cooperating company was dumping at a lower level and no bonus should be given for non-cooperation.
Poleg tega tudi ni bilo dokazov, da bi katera koli nesodelujoča družba izvajala damping na nižji stopnji, družb pa se za nesodelovanje ne sme nagrajevati.
The dumping margins were therefore established on the highest margins established for representative types of one cooperating producer in the countries concerned or the highest margins established for representative transactions by one cooperating producer in the countries concerned.
Stopnje dampinga so bile zato določene na podlagi najvišjih stopenj, določenih za reprezentativne vrste enega sodelujočega proizvajalca v zadevnih državah, ali najvišjih stopenj, določenih za reprezentativne transakcije enega sodelujočega proizvajalca v zadevnih državah.
In the case of the Republic of Korea, the extremely low level of cooperation, i.e. only 2 % of total exports in volume based on Eurostat statistics, shows clearly a deliberate non-cooperation of major exporting producers.
Izredno nizka raven sodelovanja v primeru Republike Koreje (na podlagi statističnih podatkov Eurostata sta bila prijavljena le 2 % celotnega obsega izvoza) jasno kaže, da večji proizvajalci izvozniki namerno ne sodelujejo.
In view of this peculiar situation, and in the absence of any more appropriate information, it was considered appropriate to set a dumping margin for the non-cooperating companies at the level of the dumping margin for a representative product type indicated in the complaint, namely, 15,0 %.
Glede na ta poseben položaj in ker ni bilo na voljo nobenih ustreznejših informacij, se je zdelo primerno določiti stopnjo dampinga za nesodelujoče družbe na ravni stopnje dampinga za reprezentativno vrsto izdelka, navedene v pritožbi, tj. 15,0 %.
The level of the dumping margin indicated in the complaint was checked by reference to published price lists and Eurostat statistics.
Raven stopnje dampinga, navedena v pritožbi, je bila preverjena na podlagi objavljenih cenikov in statističnih podatkov Eurostata.
In the case of the PRC, the level of cooperation was very high as the volume of exports to the Community reported by the cooperating exporting producers during the IP exceeded the import volumes according to the Eurostat data and as there was no reason to believe that any exporting producer deliberately abstained from cooperation.
V primeru LRK je bila raven sodelovanja zelo visoka, saj je obseg izvoza v Skupnost, ki so ga prijavili sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki v OP, presegel obseg uvoza, ki ga je zabeležil Eurostat, zato ni bilo nobenega razloga za prepričanje, da kateri koli proizvajalec izvoznik namerno ne bi sodeloval.
In order to differentiate between the cooperating Chinese exporting producers who have all been granted MET, and potential other Chinese exporting producers that have not cooperated in the investigation, it was considered appropriate to establish the countrywide dumping margin for the PRC based on a comparison between the export prices of the most sold representative product types according to the Eurostat data and the normal value of the same product types in the analogue country.
Da bi razlikovali med sodelujočimi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim je bil odobren TGO, in drugimi možnimi kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, ki v preiskavi niso sodelovali, se je zdelo primerno določiti stopnjo dampinga na ravni države za LRK, ki bi temeljila na primerjavi med izvoznimi cenami vrst izdelka, ki so po podatkih Eurostata glede na prodajo najbolj reprezentativne, in normalno vrednostjo istih vrst izdelka v primerljivi državi.
The dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the CIF Community frontier price, duty unpaid are the following:
Stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek vrednosti CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, so:
Hua Fei Colour Display Systems Co., Ltd and LG Philips Shuguang Electronic Co., Ltd
Hua Fei Colour Display Systems Co., Ltd. in L.G. Philips Shuguang Electronic Co., Ltd
Thai CRT Co., Ltd and CRT Display Technology Co., Ltd
Thai CRT Co., Ltd and CRT Display Technology Co., Ltd.
During the IP, the like product was produced by seven Community producers.
Podobni izdelek je v OP proizvajalo sedem proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
However, four of these producers are related to exporters in the countries concerned.
Vendar so štirje izmed njih povezani z izvozniki v zadevnih državah.
These four companies might thus be shielded from the negative consequences of the injurious dumping due to their relationship with the exporter.
Te štiri družbe bi lahko bile torej zaščitene pred negativnimi posledicami škodljivega dampinga zaradi njihove povezave z izvoznikom.
This is also indicated by the fact that these producers did not cooperate in the proceeding.
Na to kaže tudi dejstvo, da ti proizvajalci niso sodelovali v preiskavi.
It was considered appropriate to exclude their output from the Community production and also to exclude them from the definition of the Community industry.
Menilo se je, da je njihovo proizvodnjo primerno izključiti iz proizvodnje Skupnosti, njih pa iz opredelitve industrije Skupnosti.
Furthermore, two of these four producers have definitively stopped production after the IP.
Dva od teh štirih proizvajalcev sta v OP dokončno ustavila proizvodnjo.
Therefore the output of three producers, namely Ekranas, Ecimex and Thomson, constitute the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato predstavlja proizvodnja treh proizvajalcev, namreč družb Ekranas, Ecimex in Thomson, celotno proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe.
As indicated in recital 2, the complaint was lodged on behalf of two Community producers, namely Ekranas and Ecimex.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (2), je bila pritožba vložena v imenu dveh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, tj. Ekranas in Ecimex.
Those complainants were found to account for a major proportion of the total Community production of the product concerned, i.e. in this case more than 40 %.
Za navedena pritožnika je bilo ugotovljeno, da predstavljata večji delež celotne proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti, v tem primeru več kot 40 %.
It should be noted that both complainants, which produced the like product during the IP, stopped production and filed for bankruptcy during the first half of 2006.
Treba je opozoriti, da sta oba pritožnika, ki sta v OP proizvajala podobni izdelek, ustavila svojo proizvodnjo in v prvi polovici leta 2006 prijavila stečajni postopek.
As bankruptcy proceedings are presently on-going, it is still unclear whether production of CPT by Ekranas and Ecimex will resume or not.
Ker postopka trenutno še trajata, še vedno ni jasno, ali bosta družbi Ekranas in Ecimex ponovno začeli proizvodnjo KCBT ali ne.
After the initiation of the proceeding, Thomson has informed the Commission of their support to the complaint lodged by TUBE, and properly cooperated in the investigation.
Po uvedbi postopka je družba Thomson obvestila Komisijo o svoji podpori pritožbi, ki jo je vložil TUBE, in pri preiskavi ustrezno sodelovala.
Therefore, in the absence of information that these two producers had definitively stopped their operation, Ekranas and Ecimex are still considered to be part of the Community industry.
Ker ni informacij o tem, ali sta ta dva proizvajalca dokončno prenehala delovati, se za družbi Ekranas in Ecimex še vedno šteje, da sta del industrije Skupnosti.
Ekranas, Ecimex and Thomson are therefore deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will hereinafter be referred to as the Community industry.
Za družbe Ekranas, Ecimex in Thomson pa se šteje, da predstavljajo industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe in bodo v nadaljnjem besedilu imenovani „industrija Skupnosti“.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the Community industry’s own production on the Community market, the sales volumes obtained from the other producers and the import volumes data obtained from Eurostat.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je bila ugotovljena na podlagi obsega prodaje lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, podatkov o obsegu prodaje drugih proizvajalcev in podatkov Eurostata o obsegu uvoza.
Between 2002 and the IP, the Community market for the product concerned declined by around 14 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je trg Skupnosti za zadevni izdelek zmanjšal za približno 14 %.
Community consumption was around 9,5 million pieces in 2002, and around 8,2 million pieces in the IP.
Potrošnja Skupnosti je leta 2002 znašala približno 9,5 milijonov kosov, v OP pa približno 8,2 milijona kosov.
Specifically, it decreased by 2 % in 2003, rose by seven percentage points in 2004, and dropped suddenly by almost 20 percentage points in the IP.
Zmanjšala se je zlasti leta 2003 za 2 %, leta 2004 povečala za 7 odstotnih točk in se v OP nenadoma zmanjšala za približno 20 odstotnih točk.
Total EC consumption (pieces)
Celotna potrošnja ES (v kosih)
Further to disclosure of the provisional findings, the complainant contested the methodology used by the Commission to establish consumption.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev je pritožnik nasprotoval metodologiji, ki jo je uporabila Komisija za določitev potrošnje.
More precisely, the complainant claimed (i) that on the basis of the information provided in recital 64, it would appear that all the sales made by those Community producers related to exporters in the countries concerned had been excluded from the calculation of consumption and from the injury analysis, and (ii) that certain volumes of captive sales supplied by one of the three Community producers mentioned in recital 67 had been improperly excluded from the calculation of the consumption whereas they should have been included.
Natančneje, pritožnik je trdil, (i) da se na podlagi informacij iz uvodne izjave (64) zdi, da nobena prodaja teh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, povezanih z izvozniki v zadevnih državah, ni bila upoštevana pri izračunu potrošnje in analizi škode in (ii) da bi se določen obseg lastne prodaje, ki jo je dobavil en od treh proizvajalcev Skupnosti, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (67), praviloma moral upoštevati pri izračunu potrošnje, kar pa se ni zgodilo.
As to claim (i), it must be noted that recital 64 refers only to the definition of the Community industry and the establishment of the total Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation, and not to the calculation of the total Community consumption.
Glede trditve (i) je treba opozoriti, da se uvodna izjava (64) nanaša le na opredelitev industrije Skupnosti in določitev celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe, in ne na izračun celotne potrošnje Skupnosti.
For the establishment of the Community consumption, the sales from those producers who were excluded from the definition and production of the Community industry were included.
Za določitev te je bila upoštevana prodaja proizvajalcev, ki so bili izvzeti iz opredelitve in proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti.
This is also evident from recital 68 and from specific information disclosed to the complainant showing that the sales volume in question amounted to around 3 million pieces during the IP.
To je razvidno tudi iz uvodne izjave (68) in iz specifičnih informacij, razkritih pritožniku, ki kažejo, da je obseg zadevne prodaje v OP znašal okoli 3 milijone kosov.
Therefore, the sales of all producers within the Community, known to the complainant and to the Commission to have been operating during the period 2002 to the IP, have been included in the establishment of consumption.
Zato je bila prodaja vseh proizvajalcev v Skupnosti, ki jih pritožnik in Komisija poznajo in so poslovali med letom 2002 in OP, upoštevana pri določitvi potrošnje.
However, the producers excluded from the definition of Community industry had to be excluded from the analysis of the situation of the Community industry precisely because they were not considered to be part of it, in line with Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation.
Vendar je bilo treba proizvajalce, ki niso bili vključeni v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti, izvzeti tudi iz analize industrije Skupnosti, saj se zanje v skladu s členom 4(1) ni štelo, da so del industrije Skupnosti.
Claim (i) is therefore rejected.
Trditev (i) se zato zavrne.
As regards claim (ii), it is indeed true that the Commission excluded certain sales volumes from the calculation of consumption and from the analysis of some key injury indicators, notably sales volume and prices, market share and profitability, as these sales were considered to be captive.
V zvezi s trditvijo (ii) drži, da Komisija pri izračunu potrošnje in analizi nekaterih ključnih kazalnikov škode, in sicer obsega prodaje, cen, tržnega deleža in dobičkonosnosti, določenega obsega prodaje ni upoštevala, saj se je ta štela za lastno prodajo.
It is a long-standing practice of the Commission to separate captive sales from sales on the open market because only sales on the open market enter in competition with each other [5].
Dolgotrajna praksa Komisije je, da loči lastno prodajo od prodaje na odprtem trgu, saj med seboj konkurira le slednja [5] .
Conversely, captive sales do not compete with products sold on the free market and are therefore not affected by the dumped imports.
Lastna prodaja ne konkurira z izdelki, prodanimi na prostem trgu, zato dampinški uvoz nanjo ne vpliva.
In this particular industry, most of the large producers of the like product (unlike the two complainants) also have operations in the downstream industry, namely the further processing of the TV tube into a TV set.
Pri tej konkretni industriji je večina velikih proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka (za razliko od dveh pritožnikov) dejavna tudi v nadaljevanju proizvodnje, tj. pri vgradnji televizijskih cevi v televizijske sprejemnike.
As an example, the Commission has excluded from the analysis the captive sales made by Sony, and this approach was supported by the complainant.
Na primer, Komisija pri analizi ni upoštevala lastne prodaje družbe Sony in pritožnik je ta pristop podprl.
The same methodology has been applied consistently to all Community producers, be they part of the Community industry or considered as ‘other Community producers’ and referred to in recital 64.
Ista metodologija se je dosledno uporabljala za vse proizvajalce Skupnosti, če so del industrije Skupnosti ali se štejejo za „druge proizvajalce Skupnosti“ in so navedeni v uvodni izjavi (64).
Concerning the particular volumes of captive sales mentioned under claim (ii), the Commission observed that until July 2004, the tube factory which is today incorporated as Thomson Displays Polska Sp.
V zvezi s posebnim obsegom lastne prodaje, navedene v trditvi (ii), je Komisija ugotovila, da je bila tovarna cevi, ki je danes registrirana kot Thomson Displays Polska Sp.
Zo.o, Piaseczno, Poland, was, together with the TV sets factory of Zyrardow, Poland, incorporated under one single legal entity, namely the company TMM Polska, itself wholly owned by the mother company Thomson SA.
Z o.o, Piaseczno, Poljska, skupaj s tovarno televizijskih sprejemnikov, Zyrardow, Poljska, registrirana kot en pravni subjekt, pod imenom TMM Polska, in je bila v stoodstotni lasti matične družbe Thomson SA.
In line with standard practice, the Commission considered that it was in the presence of an integrated producer and that supplies of the like product from the tube factory of Piaseczno to the TV set factory of Zyrardow constituted an internal transfer, and were thus captive sales made at transfer prices.
V skladu z ustaljeno prakso je Komisija menila, da je družba integrirani proizvajalec in da je dobava podobnega izdelka tovarne cevi Piaseczn tovarni televizijskih sprejemnikov Zyrardow pomenila notranji prenos in je šlo torej za lastno prodajo po transfernih cenah.
The claimant de facto acknowledged the situation of transfer pricing as it stated that ‘the relationship between Thomson Display and Thomson’s CTV display could have influenced prices, but it does certainly not influence quantities’.
Pritožnik je dejansko priznal, da je šlo za transferne cene, saj je navedel, da „bi lahko povezava med družbo Thomson Display in Thomson's CTV display vplivala na cene, vendar ne nujno na količine“.
The Commission therefore confirms that these transfers cannot be considered alike sales on the free market.
Komisija zato potrjuje, da se za ta prenos ne more šteti, da je podoben prodaji na prostem trgu.
Finally and for the sake of clarity only, it should be noted that, even if those captive sales were to be included in the consumption (see table just below), only the total levels would change, but the trend, namely the substantial demand contraction of the IP would remain very similar to the one described in recital 69.
Nazadnje in zaradi pojasnitve je treba opozoriti, da bi se, tudi če bi bila lastna prodaja vključena v potrošnjo (glej spodnjo tabelo), spremenil le celoten obseg, trend znatne potrošnje v OP pa bi ostal zelo podoben trendu, opisanem v uvodni izjavi (69).
Claim (ii) is therefore rejected.
Zahtevek (ii) je zato zavrnjen.
Total EC consumption based on captive and non-captive sales (pieces)
Celotna potrošnja ES, ki temelji na omejeni in neomejeni prodaji (v kosih)
The Commission considered whether imports from the countries concerned should be assessed cumulatively on the basis of the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je proučila, ali je treba uvoz iz zadevnih držav oceniti kumulativno na podlagi meril iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission verified that (i) the dumping margin established for each country concerned is more than the de minimis threshold as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation and (ii) conditions of competition between imported products and the like Community product are similar.
Komisija je preverila, ali (i) je stopnja dampinga, določena za vsako zadevno državo, višja od praga de minimis, kot je določeno v členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe in (ii) ali so konkurenčni pogoji med uvoženimi izdelki in podobnim izdelkom Skupnosti podobni.
It is firstly noted that the data pertaining to Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co., Ltd and to LG Philips Display Korea Co., Ltd, i.e. the two exporting producers in the countries concerned which were found not to have dumped the product concerned, have been properly excluded from the following analysis, which concerns exclusively dumped imports.
Najprej je treba opozoriti, da so bili podatki, ki se nanašajo na družbi Beijing Matsushita Color CRT Co., Ltd in LG Philips Display Korea Co., Ltd, tj. dva proizvajalca izvoznika v zadevnih državah, za katera je bilo ugotovljeno, da zadevnega izdelka nista prodajala po dampinških cenah, ustrezno izvzeti iz naslednje analize, ki zajema izključno dampinški uvoz.
For information, the volume of imports from the two aforementioned producers was marginal during the IP as it was significantly less than 1 % of Community consumption.
Za informacijo, obseg uvoza zgoraj navedenih družb je bil v OP zelo majhen, saj je bil znatno manjši od 1 % potrošnje Skupnosti.
This was evidenced by the fact that the product concerned imported from the countries concerned and the like product produced and sold by the Community industry within the Community market were alike, compete against each other and are distributed via the same trade channels.
Dokaz za to je dejstvo, da sta zadevni izdelek, uvožen iz zadevnih držav, in podobni izdelek, ki ga je proizvedla in prodala industrija Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, podobna, da si med seboj konkurirata in se prodajata ter kupujeta po istih prodajni poteh.
Moreover all import volumes were substantial and resulted in significant market shares.
Poleg tega je bil celoten obseg uvoza znaten, zato je bil tak tudi njegov tržni delež.
In the light of the above, it was considered that all the criteria set out in Article 3(4) of the basic Regulation were met.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se je štelo, da so vsa merila iz člena 3(4) osnovne uredbe izpolnjena.
The dumped imports from the four countries concerned were therefore examined cumulatively.
Dampinški uvoz iz štirih zadevnih držav je bil zato proučen kumulativno.
The volume of dumped imports into the Community of the product concerned originating from the countries concerned stood just below 1,6 million pieces in the IP, a level close to that observed in 2002.
Obseg dampinškega uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz zadevnih držav v Skupnost je bil v OP tik pod 1,6 milijona kosov, tj. blizu ravni iz leta 2002.
This apparent stability hides sharp variations in the years 2003, 2004 and the IP.
Za to očitno stabilnostjo pa se skrivajo močna nihanja v letih 2003, 2004 in v OP.
Imports rose by 44 % in 2003, declined by three percentage points in 2004 and dropped further by 44 percentage points in the IP.
Uvoz se je leta 2003 povečal za 44 %, leta 2004 zmanjšal za 3 odstotne točke, v OP pa še za nadaljnjih 44 odstotnih točk.
Volume of dumped imports from the countries concerned (pieces)
Obseg dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav (v kosih)
Market share of dumped imports from the countries concerned
Tržni delež dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav
Prices of dumped imports from the countries concerned (EUR/piece)
Cene dampinškega uvoza iz zadevnih držav (EUR/kos)
The market share held by exporters in the countries concerned increased from 17 % in 2002 to 19,4 % in the IP.
Tržni delež izvoznikov v zadevnih državah se je povečal s 17 % leta 2002 na 19,4 % v OP.
In detail, the market share experienced a jump by almost eight percentage points in 2003, declined by around two percentage points in 2004 and dropped further by around 3,5 percentage points in the IP.
Natančneje, tržni delež se je leta 2003 povečal za skoraj 8 odstotnih točk, se leta 2004 zmanjšal za približno 2 odstotni točki, v OP pa še za 3,5 odstotne točke.
The fact that the market share of the imports from the countries concerned was higher in the IP than in 2002, although there were fewer imports in volume in the IP than in 2002 can be explained by a sudden drop in consumption as described in recital 69.
Razlog za dejstvo, da je bil tržni delež uvoza iz zadevnih držav v OP višji kot leta 2002 kljub manjšemu uvozu v OP kot leta 2002, je nenaden upad potrošnje, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (69).
Price evolution
Razvoj cene
Between 2002 and the IP, the average price of imports of the product concerned originating in the countries concerned declined by 24 %.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je povprečna cena uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz zadevnih držav znižala za 24 %.
Specifically, the price dropped by 15 % in 2003, by a further 21 percentage points in 2004, before increasing again by 12 percentage points in the IP.
Zlasti se je cena znižala leta 2003, in sicer za 15 %, leta 2004 za nadaljnjih 21 odstotnih točk, nato pa se je v OP ponovno zvišala za 12 odstotnih točk.