natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The letter further explained that (underlining added) ‘while I cannot give a formal commitment that there will be no change in the legislation I am satisfied that, in view of the vital importance of exports to the Irish economy, there is no possibility of the legislation being changed, in the foreseeable future, to the detriment of the Alcan project’. The IDA proceeds by stressing the reputation of the Irish Government in this respect.
Dopis nadalje razlaga, da (podčrtanje dodano) „medtem ko vam ne moremo ponuditi formalne obveze, da ne bo prišlo do spremembe zakonodaje, smo prepričani, da spričo ključnega pomena izvoza za irsko gospodarstvo ni mogoče, da bi se v predvidljivi prihodnosti zakonodaja spremenila v škodo projekta Alcan.“ IDA v zvezi s tem nadaljuje s poudarjanjem ugleda irske vlade.
It does not have the possibility to cogenerate heat and power, which would reduce the costs by about EUR 10 million per year. The Italian environmental legislation, furthermore, imposes additional costs amounting to about EUR 8 million per year.
Nima možnosti za hkratno proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike, kar bi letno znižalo stroške za okoli 10 milijonov EUR. Poleg tega ji italijanska okoljska zakonodaja nalaga dodatne stroške, ki letno znašajo okoli 8 milijonov EUR.
The exemptions only partially compensate for the disadvantages of the European plants compared to their global competitors as regards raw materials, transport, energy and environmental standards. The European alumina producers currently do not meet internal European demand and the revocation of the exemptions would result in increased imports from other parts of the world.
Oprostitve le delno nadomeščajo prikrajšanost evropskih tovarn v primerjavi z njihovimi svetovnimi konkurenti v smislu surovin, prevoza, energetskih in okoljskih standardov Evropski proizvajalci aluminijevega oksida trenutno ne zadostijo notranjemu evropskemu povpraševanju in preklic oprostitev bi povzročil povečan uvoz iz drugih delov sveta.
concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 61(c) thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 61(c) Pogodbe, v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) ter prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not bound by the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters [2], nor subject to their application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, določbe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah [2] Danske ne zavezujejo niti jih ni dolžna uporabljati.
The Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.
Komisija je s pogajanji dosegla sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o razširitvi določb Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001 na Dansko.
The Agreement was signed, on behalf of the European Community, on 19 October 2005, subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2005/790/EC of 20 September 2005 [3].
Sporazum je bil podpisan v imenu Evropske skupnosti dne 19. oktobra 2005 ob upoštevanju njegove morebitne poznejše sklenitve v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2005/790/ES z dne 20. septembra 2005 [3].
In accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, the United Kingdom and Ireland are taking part in the adoption and application of this Decision.
V skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o Evropski skupnosti, Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sodelujeta pri sprejetju in uporabi tega sklepa.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Danska v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa jo Sklep ne zavezuje niti ga ni dolžna uporabljati.
The Agreement should be approved,
Ta sporazum bi bilo treba odobriti –
The Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah se odobri v imenu Skupnosti.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to make the notification provided for in Article 12(2) of the Agreement.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno (-e) za uradno obvestitev iz člena 12(2) Sporazuma.
Done at Luxembourg, 27 April 2006.
V Luxembourgu, 27. aprila 2006
Opinion delivered on 23 March 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 23. marca 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2245/2004 (UL L 381, 28.12.2004, str. 10).
OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 61.
UL L 299, 16.11.2005, str. 61.
concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters
o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 61(c) thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 61(c) Pogodbe, v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not bound by the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters [2], nor subject to their application.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, določbe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah [2] Danske ne zavezujejo niti jih ni dolžna uporabljati.
The Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark extending to Denmark the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000.
Komisija je s pogajanji dosegla sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o razširitvi določb Uredbe (ES) št. 1348/2000 na Dansko.
The Agreement was signed, on behalf of the European Community, on 19 October 2005, subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision 2005/794/EC of 20 September 2005 [3].
Sporazum je bil podpisan v imenu Evropske skupnosti dne 19. oktobra 2005 ob upoštevanju njegove morebitne poznejše sklenitve v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2005/794/ES z dne 20. septembra 2005 [3].
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Danska v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske ne sodeluje pri sprejetju tega sklepa, jo Sklep ne zavezuje niti ga ni dolžna uporabljati.
The Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on the service of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
Sporazum med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Dansko o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah se odobri v imenu Skupnosti.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to make the notification provided for in Article 10(2) of the Agreement.
Predsednik Sveta pooblaščen, da imenuje osebo(-e), pooblaščeno(-e) za uradno obvestitev iz člena 10(2) Sporazuma.
OJ L 300, 17.11.2005, p. 53.
UL L 300, 17.11.2005, str. 53.
amending Decision 2003/526/EC as regards the prolongation of the application of protection measures relating to classical swine fever in certain Member States
o spremembi Odločbe 2003/526/ES glede podaljšanja uporabe zaščitnih ukrepov v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo v nekaterih državah članicah
(notified under document number C(2006) 1719)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1719)
That Decision establishes certain additional disease control measures concerning classical swine fever and lays down the period of application of the measures.
Ta odločba uvaja nekatere dodatne ukrepe za nadzor bolezni v zvezi s klasično prašičjo kugo in določa čas uporabe ukrepov.
It is appropriate in the light of the available epidemiological information to prolong the application of the measures until 30 April 2007.
Glede na epidemiološke podatke, ki so na voljo, je zato primerno podaljšati uporabo ukrepov do 30. aprila 2007.
In Article 11 of Decision 2003/526/EC ‘30 April 2006’ is replaced by ‘30 April 2007’.
V členu 11 Odločbe 2003/526/ES se „30. aprila 2006“ nadomesti s „30. aprila 2007“.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/284/EC (OJ L 104, 13.4.2006, p. 48).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/284/ES (UL L 104, 13.4.2006, str. 48).
of 4 May 2006
z dne 4. maja 2006
(notified under document number C(2006) 1897)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1897)
On the basis of new epidemiological information provided by Germany, the duration for the minimum residence of pigs in the holding of origin should be reduced from 45 days to 30 days.
Na podlagi novih epidemioloških podatkov, ki jih je zagotovila Nemčija, je treba dolžino minimalnega bivanja prašičev na gospodarstvu izvora zmanjšati s 45 na 30 dni.
In Article 1, paragraph 2(b) is replaced by the following:
V členu 1 se odstavek 2(b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
the transport of breeding and production pigs to a holding outside Germany, provided that the vehicles used for transport of pigs comply with the requirements in Article 6(2)(a) and that the pigs have been resident for at least 30 days, or since birth if less than 30 days of age, on a single holding:
prevoz plemenskih prašičev in pitancev na gospodarstvo zunaj Nemčije pod pogojem, da vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz prašičev, izpolnjujejo zahteve iz člena 6(2)(a) in da so prašiči najmanj 30 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 30 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
which is situated outside the areas listed in Annex I;
ki se nahaja zunaj območij iz Priloge I;
which has not received live pigs during the 30-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch of the pigs;
na katero v 30 dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem prašičev niso bili sprejeti živi prašiči;
Article 2, paragraph 1(b) is replaced by the following:
V členu 2 se odstavek 1(b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
breeding and production pigs to a holding, provided that the pigs have been resident for at least 30 days, or since birth if less than 30 days of age, on a single holding:
plemenskih prašičev in pitancev na gospodarstvo pod pogojem, da so prašiči najmanj 30 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 30 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
which has not received live pigs during the 30-day period immediately prior to the date of dispatch of the pigs; and
na katero v 30 dneh neposredno pred odpošiljanjem prašičev niso bili sprejeti živi prašiči; ter
Article 2, paragraph 2(b) is replaced by the following:
V členu 2 se odstavek 2(b) nadomesti z naslednjim:
to a holding situated within the areas laid down in Annex I, provided that the pigs have been resident for at least 30 days, or since birth if less than 30 days of age, on a single holding:
na gospodarstvo znotraj območij iz Priloge I, pod pogojem, da so prašiči najmanj 30 dni ali od rojstva, če so stari manj kot 30 dni, bivali na enem samem gospodarstvu:
The German authorities shall record the above movements and inform immediately the Commission in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health on the movements that take place from a holding situated within the areas laid down in Annex I (A) to a holding situated within the areas laid down in Annex I (B).’
Nemški organi evidentirajo zgoraj navedene premike in Komisijo v Stalnem odboru za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali takoj obvestijo o premikih z gospodarstva znotraj območij iz priloge I(A) na gospodarstvo znotraj območij iz Priloge I(B)“.
Member States shall ensure that vehicles which have been used for the transport of pigs in Germany or have entered a holding in Germany where pigs are kept are cleaned and disinfected twice after the last operation before these vehicles may be used for the transport of pigs outside Germany.’
Države članice zagotovijo, da se vozila, ki so bila uporabljena za prevoz prašičev v Nemčiji ali so vstopila na gospodarstvo v Nemčiji, kjer so prašiči, po vsakem prevozu dvakrat očistijo in razkužijo, preden se lahko ta vozila uporabijo za prevoz prašičev zunaj Nemčije.“
Done at Brussels, 4 May 2006.
V Bruslju, 4. maja 2006
Decision as last amended by Decision 2006/306/EC (OJ L 113, 27.4.2006).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2006/306/ES (UL L 113, 27.4.2006, str. 6).
laying down a questionnaire to be used for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste
o vprašalniku, ki se bo uporabljal za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES o sežiganju odpadkov
(notified under document number C(2006) 438)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 438)
Having regard to Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste [1] and, in particular, Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov [1], in zlasti člena 15 Direktive,
Member States had to implement Directive 2000/76/EC before 28 December 2002 and will have to report about the implementation in accordance with a questionnaire to be developed by the Commission.
Države članice so morale Direktivo 2000/76/ES uveljaviti pred 28. decembrom 2002, o izvajanju pa bodo morale poročati v skladu z vprašalnikom, ki ga bo pripravila Komisija.
The overall purpose of this questionnaire is, through Member States’ responses, to gather information on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC, and to identify approaches to regulating incineration and co-incineration plants across Member States.
Glavni namen tega vprašalnika je, na podlagi odgovorov držav članic zbrati podatke o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES in ugotoviti različne pristope za urejanje sežigalnic in sosežigalnic v državah članicah.
The reporting period has to cover the first full three years after 28 December 2002, and has to be defined taking into account the reporting requirements of Directive 94/67/EC and 96/61/EC.
Poročevalno obdobje mora zajemati prva polna tri leta po 28. decembru 2002 in mora biti določeno tako, da upošteva zahteve Direktiv 94/67/ES in 96/61/ES glede poročanja.
Taking into account that Directive 2000/76/EC applies in full to all existing plants from 28 December 2005 onwards, and since the overwhelming majority of plants operated in the EU belong to the group of existing plants, and that Directive 94/67/EC is repealed as of 28 December 2005, and reporting under Directive 96/61/EC covers the period to 2006-2008 inclusive, the most appropriate first full reporting period is 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2008.
Direktiva 2000/76/ES velja v celoti za vse obstoječe obrate od 28. decembra 2005 naprej, in ker velika večina obratov, ki delujejo v EU, sodi v skupino obstoječih obratov, in ob upoštevanju, da je Direktiva 94/67/ES z 28. decembrom 2005 razveljavljena, in da poročanje v okviru Direktive 96/61/ES zajema obdobje od 2006 do vključno 2008, je najprimernejše prvo polno poročevalno obdobje od 1. januarja 2006 do 31. decembra 2008.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 6 of Council Directive 91/692/EEC [2],
Ukrepi, predvideni v tej direktivi, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 6 Direktive Sveta 91/692/EGS [2] –
Member States shall use the questionnaire laid down in the Annex for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC in accordance with Article 15 thereof.
Države članice za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES v skladu s členom 15 te direktive uporabijo vprašalnik iz Priloge.
The first report shall cover the three year period starting from 1 January 2006 and shall be transmitted to the Commission by 30 September 2009 at the latest.
Prvo poročilo zajema obdobje treh let z začetkom od 1. januarja 2006 in se Komisiji predloži najkasneje do 30. septembra 2009.
OJ L 377, 31.12.1991, p. 48
UL L 377, 31.12.1991, str. 48.
Questionnaire to be used for reporting on the implementation of Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste
Vprašalnik za poročanje o izvajanju Direktive 2000/76/ES o sežiganju odpadkov
Please note: Please provide references to identify information that has already been submitted to the Commission.
Opomba: Prosimo, predložite reference za identificiranje informacij, ki so že bile predložene Komisiji.
Article 2(1) 1.
Člen 2(1) 1.
How many incineration plants and how many co-incineration plants in your Member State fall within the scope of Directive 2000/76/EC?
Koliko sežigalnic in koliko sosežigalnic v vaši državi članici sodi v okvir Direktive 2000/76/ES?
Article 3 2.
Člen 3 2.
Please describe any problems with the definitions given in Article 3 identified when transposing and implementing the Directive?
Opišite vse težave z opredelitvami iz člena 3, ki ste jih odkrili pri prenosu in izvajanju te direktive.
Article 4(1) 3.
Člen 4(1) 3.
How many permits have been issued in accordance with Article 4(1) for:
Koliko dovoljenj je bilo v skladu s členom 4(1) izdanih za:
new incineration plants?
nove sežigalnice;
existing incineration plants?
obstoječe sežigalnice;
new co-incineration plants? and
nove sosežigalnice;
existing co-incineration plants?
obstoječe sosežigalnice?
Note: ‘Existing’ plants are as defined in Article 3 paragraph 6.
Opomba: „Obstoječi“ obrati so opredeljeni v odstavku 6 člena 3.
‘New’ plants are all other plants.
„Novi“ obrati so vsi drugi obrati.
Have any mobile plants received permits under this Directive?
Ali so v okviru te direktive dobili dovoljenje tudi mobilni obrati?
How many incineration plants and how many co-incineration plants have yet to be permitted in accordance with Article 4(1)?
Koliko sežigalnic in sosežigalnic mora še dobiti dovoljenje v skladu s členom 4(1)?
Article 4(4) 6.
Člen 4(4) 6.
Where these data are available, indicate the total permitted capacities of waste throughput for:
Kjer so ti podatki dostopni, navedite skupne dovoljene zmogljivosti sežiganja odpadkov za:
new incineration plants;
nove sežigalnice;
existing incineration plants;
obstoječe sežigalnice;
new co-incineration plants; and
nove sosežigalnice;
existing co-incineration plants.
obstoječe sosežigalnice.
What categories of waste (as set up within the European Waste Catalogue, if possible) are being co-incinerated in cement plants?
Katere kategorije odpadov (kakor so določene v Evropskem katalogu odpadkov, če je mogoče) se sosežigajo v cementarnah?
What categories of waste (as set up within the European Waste Catalogue, if possible) are being co-incinerated in:
Katere kategorije odpadov (kakor so določene v Evropskem katalogu odpadkov, če je mogoče) se sosežigajo v:
Combustion plants other than cement (e.g. power stations)?; and,
obratih za izgorevanje, ki niso cementarne (npr. elektrarnah);
Industrial sectors not covered under Annex II.1 or II.2 co-incinerating waste?
industrijskih sektorjih, ki niso zajeti v Prilogi II.1 ali II.2 o sosežiganju odpadkov?
If these data are available, please identify the amounts of waste that may be co-incinerated in these plants.
Če so podatki dostopni, navedite količine odpadkov, ki jih je mogoče sosežgati v teh obratih.
Article 4(5) 10.
Člen 4(5) 10.
What provisions are made within the permitting process for:
Kateri predpisi veljajo v postopku izdajanja dovoljenja za:
Identifying the quantities and categories of hazardous waste that may be treated?
določanje količin in kategorij nevarnih odpadkov, ki se lahko obdelajo;
The minimum and maximum flows of hazardous wastes to be treated?
najmanjše in največje pretoke nevarnih odpadkov, ki gredo v obdelavo;
The range of calorific values of hazardous wastes permitted and restrictions on the content of pollutants e.g. PCB, PCP, chlorine, fluorine, sulphur, heavy metals?
obseg kaloričnih vrednosti dovoljenih nevarnih odpadkov in omejitve vsebine onesnaževal, npr. PCB, PCP, klor, fluor, žveplo, težke kovine?
Article 5(4) 11.
Člen 5(4) 11.
What wastes have been considered to be ‘inappropriate’ for representative sampling?
Kateri odpadki so veljali kot „neprimerni“ za reprezentativno vzorčenje?
Article 6(4) 12.
Člen 6(4) 12.
With regard to the furnace gas residence times and temperatures as laid out in Article 6(1):
V zvezi z zadrževalnimi časi in temperaturami plavžnih plinov, kakor je določeno v členu 6(1):
Have any exemptions from the operating conditions been granted in accordance with Article 6(4)?
Ali so bile v skladu s členom 6(4) odobrene kakšne izjeme v obratovalnih pogojih?
If the answer to (a) is ‘yes’, how many exemptions have been granted?
Če je odgovor na (a) pritrdilen, koliko izjem je bilo odobrenih?
Where these data are available, please describe the reasoning for granting the derogation(s) for each case including:
Kjer so podatki dostopni, navedite razloge odobritve odstopanja za vsak primer posebej, vključno z:
identification of the capacity of the incinerator or co-incinerator;
navedbo zmogljivosti sežigalnice ali sosežigalnice;
the approximate age of the incinerator, or co-incinerator, or whether it is ‘existing’ plant as defined in article 3(6) or new plant;
približno starost sežigalnice ali sosežigalnice oziroma ali gre za „obstoječi“ obrat, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 3(6), ali za nov obrat;
the type of waste incinerated;
vrste odpadkov, ki se sežigajo;
how the requirement to ensure that no more residues are produced compared to, and that the content of organic pollutants in those residues is no more than expected from, a non-exempted plant;
kako je zagotovljeno, da proizvodnja ostankov v primerjavi z neizvzetim obratom ni večja, in da vsebina organskih onesnaževal v teh ostankih ni večja od pričakovane količine v neizvzetem obratu;
the operating conditions laid down in the permit; and
obratovalnimi pogoji, določenimi v dovoljenju; in