natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, the fact that Chinese export prices to the other main markets for magnesium oxide were 38 % below the export prices to the Community shows clearly that Community industry would face more pressure from increased volumes of dumped exports of the product concerned from the PRC, bearing in mind that these exports have already exerted a downward pressure on the Community prices during the period considered.
Dejstvo, da so bile kitajske cene za izvoz magnezijevega oksida na druge glavne trge 38 % nižje od izvoznih cen v Skupnost, jasno kaže, da bi povečan obseg dampinškega izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz LRK pomenil še večji pritisk za industrijo Skupnosti, če se upošteva, da je ta izvoz v obravnavanem obdobju že pritiskal na znižanje cen v Skupnosti.
In the light of the above, it is concluded that allowing the measures to lapse would in all likelihood result in a recurrence of injury to the Community industry.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se sklepa, da bi prenehanje veljavnosti ukrepov po vsej verjetnosti industriji Skupnosti povzročilo ponovno škodo.
In accordance with Article 21 of the basic Regulation, it was examined whether maintaining the existing anti-dumping measures would be against the interest of the Community as a whole.
V skladu s členom 21 osnovne uredbe se je preučilo, ali bi bila ohranitev obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov v nasprotju z interesom Skupnosti kot celote.
The determination of Community interest was based on an appreciation of all the various interests involved, i.e. those of the Community industry, the importers/traders as well as the users and suppliers of the product concerned.
Ugotovitev interesa Skupnosti je temeljila na oceni vseh različnih vpletenih interesov, tj. interesa industrije Skupnosti, uvoznikov/trgovcev in tudi uporabnikov ter dobaviteljev zadevnega izdelka.
It should be recalled that in the previous review, the re-imposition of the measures was considered not to be against the interest of the Community.
Treba je spomniti, da se pri prejšnjem pregledu ponovna uvedba ukrepov ni štela kot nasprotna interesu Skupnosti.
Furthermore, as the present investigation is also an expiry review, it allows an analysis of any undue negative impact on the parties concerned by the current anti-dumping measures.
Ker je sedanja preiskava obenem pregled zaradi izteka ukrepov, omogoča analizo vsakršnega nepotrebnega negativnega učinka, ki ga imajo na zadevne stranke sedanji protidampinški ukrepi.
On this basis, it was examined whether, despite the conclusion on the likelihood of a continuation of injurious dumping, compelling reasons existed which would lead to the conclusion that it is not in the Community interest to maintain measures in this particular case.
Na podlagi tega se je preučilo, ali kljub ugotovitvi, da obstaja verjetnost nadaljevanja škodljivega dampinga, obstajajo tehtni razlogi, zaradi katerih bi bilo mogoče sklepati, da sprejetje ukrepov v tem primeru ni v interesu Skupnosti.
It is recalled that it has been established that there is a likelihood of continuation of dumping of the product concerned originating in the PRC and that there is a risk of recurrence of injury to the Community industry arising from such imports.
Treba je spomniti, da je bila ugotovljena verjetnost nadaljevanja dampinga zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK in tveganje ponovne škode za industrijo Skupnosti, ki bi jo tak uvoz povzročil.
Moreover, it was found that the Community industry is still in a fragile situation.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je industrija Skupnosti še vedno v občutljivem položaju.
Continuation of the measures should help them to fully recover and avoid further injury.
Nadaljevanje ukrepov naj bi pomagalo, da bi si popolnoma opomogla ter preprečilo nadaljnjo škodo.
Therefore, it is in the interest of the Community industry to maintain measures against dumped imports from the PRC.
Zato je v interesu industrije Skupnosti, da ohrani ukrepe proti dampinškemu uvozu iz LRK.
Interests of unrelated importers/traders
Interesi nepovezanih uvoznikov/trgovcev
The Commission’s services sent out questionnaires to 23 importers/traders named in the complaint.
Službe Komisije so poslale vprašalnike 23 uvoznikom/trgovcem, imenovanim v pritožbi.
No answers were received.
Prejele niso nobenega odgovora.
In these circumstances, it was concluded that the measures in force did not greatly affect importers or traders and therefore the continuation of measures would not significantly affect these parties.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo ugotovljeno, da veljavni ukrepi niso imeli velikega vpliva na uvoznike ali trgovce in zato nadaljevanje ukrepov ne bi občutno vplivalo na te stranke.
This is also in line with the findings made in previous investigations.
Navedeno je tudi v skladu z ugotovitvami iz prejšnjih preiskav.
Interests of users
Interesi uporabnikov
The Commission’s services sent out questionnaires to four users.
Službe Komisije so poslale vprašalnike štirim uporabnikom.
Given the lack of response to the questionnaires and of verifiable data in support of an expiry of the measures in force, as in the previous expiry review, it is concluded that the continuation of the duties would not have a significant effect on users.
Glede na pomanjkanje odziva na vprašalnike in preverljivih podatkov, ki bi podprli iztek veljavnih ukrepov kot pri prejšnjem pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, je bilo ugotovljeno, da ohranitev dajatev ne bi bistveno vplivala na uporabnike.
The investigation has shown that exporters in the PRC have continued their dumping practices during the IP.
Raziskava je pokazala, da so izvozniki v LRK v OP nadaljevali z dampinško prakso.
It has also been demonstrated that the Community market is an attractive market for Chinese exporters, given the level of prices charged to other export markets and bearing in mind significant spare capacity in the PRC.
Dokazano je bilo tudi, da je glede na cenovno raven v primerjavi z drugimi izvoznimi trgi in ob upoštevanju znatne proste zmogljivosti v LRK trg Skupnosti za kitajske izvoznike privlačen.
Therefore, if measures were repealed, it is likely that huge quantities of dumped imports would enter the Community market.
Zato bi v primeru razveljavitve ukrepov na trg Skupnosti verjetno prišle ogromne količine dampinškega uvoza.
The situation of the Community industry, reflected in the reduced production, sales and employment and insufficient profit during the period considered, would most likely be aggravated if measures were repealed as increased volumes of dumped imports from the PRC would start to flow onto the Community market.
Stanje v industriji Skupnosti, ki se je odražalo v zmanjšani proizvodnji, prodaji in zaposlovanju ter nezadostnemu dobičku v navedenem obdobju, bi se najverjetneje poslabšalo, če bi ukrepe razveljavili, saj bi na trg Skupnosti začela pritekati povečana količina dampinškega uvoza iz LRK.
Regarding the Community interest, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose anti-dumping measures against imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC.
Glede interesa Skupnosti se sklene, da ni nujnih razlogov za to, da ne bi uvedli protidampinških ukrepov proti uvozu zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK.
It is therefore considered appropriate to maintain the current anti-dumping measures against imports of magnesium oxide originating in the PRC.
Zato se šteje, da je primerno ohraniti obstoječe protidampinške ukrepe proti uvozu magnezijevega oksida s poreklom iz LRK.
All parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend that the existing measures be maintained.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravala priporočiti ohranitev obstoječih ukrepov.
They were also granted a period to make representations subsequent to disclosure.
Po tem obvestilu jim je bil dan tudi rok za podajo stališč.
No comments were received which were such as to change the above conclusions.
Prejete niso bile nobene pripombe, zaradi katerih bi se spremenili zgoraj omenjeni sklepi.
It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of magnesium oxide originating in the PRC, imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1334/1999, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 985/2003, should be maintained,
Iz zgoraj navedenega sledi, kakor je določeno v členu 11(2) osnovne uredbe, da je treba protidampinške ukrepe, ki se uporabljajo pri uvozu magnezijevega oksida s poreklom iz LRK, in so bili uvedeni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1334/1999 in nazadnje spremenjeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 985/2003, ohraniti –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of magnesium oxide falling within CN code ex25199090 (Taric code 25199090*10) and originating in the People’s Republic of China.
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz magnezijevega oksida iz oznake KN ex25199090 (oznaka TARIC 25199090*10) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The amount of the anti-dumping duty shall be:
Višina protidampinške dajatve je:
the difference between the minimum import price of EUR 112 per tonne and the net, free-at-Community frontier price, before duty, in all cases where the latter is:
razlika med minimalno uvozno ceno 112 EUR za tono ter neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, neplačana dajatev, v vsakem primeru, ko je slednja:
less than the minimum import price, and
nižja od minimalne uvozne cene, in
established on the basis of an invoice issued by an exporter located in the People’s Republic of China directly to an unrelated party in the Community (TARIC additional code A420);
določena na podlagi računa, ki ga je izstavil izvoznik s sedežem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski neposredno nepovezani stranki v Skupnosti (dodatna oznaka TARIC A420);
zero, if the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, is established on the basis of an invoice issued by an exporter located in the People’s Republic of China directly to an unrelated party in the Community and equal to or higher than the minimum import price of EUR 112 per tonne (TARIC additional code A420);
nič, če je neto cena franko meja Skupnosti, neplačana dajatev, določena na podlagi računa, ki ga je izstavil izvoznik s sedežem v Ljudski republiki Kitajski neposredno nepovezani stranki v Skupnosti, in enaka ali višja kot minimalna uvozna cena, ki znaša 112 EUR za tono (dodatna oznaka TARIC A420);
equal to an ad valorem duty of 27,1 % in all other cases not falling under subparagraph (a) and (b) (TARIC additional code A999).
enaka 27,1 % dajatvi ad valorem v vseh drugih primerih, ki jih ne zajemata pododstavka (a) in (b) (dodatna oznaka TARIC A999).
In cases where the anti-dumping duty is established according to subparagraph 2(a) of Article 1 and where goods have been damaged before entry into free circulation and, therefore, the price actually paid or payable is apportioned for the determination of the customs value pursuant to Article 145 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code [7], the minimum import price set out above shall be reduced by a percentage which corresponds to the apportioning of the price actually paid or payable.
V primerih, ko se protidampinška dajatev določi v skladu s pododstavkom 2(a) člena 1 in ko je bilo blago poškodovano, preden je bilo dano v prosti promet, zaradi česar je dejansko plačana ali se lahko plača cena za določitev carinske vrednosti porazdeljena v skladu s členom 145 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti [7], se minimalna, zgoraj določena uvozna cena, zmanjša za odstotek, ki ustreza porazdelitvi dejansko plačane ali cene, ki se lahko plača.
The duty payable will then be equal to the difference between the reduced minimum import price and the reduced net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before customs clearance.
Plačljiva dajatev bo tako enaka razliki med zmanjšano minimalno uvozno ceno in zmanjšano neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred carinjenjem.
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning custom duties shall apply.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabijo veljavne določbe o carinah.
OJ L 159, 25.6.1999, p. 1.
UL L 159, 25.6.1999, str. 1.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 985/2003 (OJ L 143, 11.6.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 985/2003 (UL L 143, 11.6.2003, str. 1).
OJ L 143, 11.6.2003, p. 1.
UL L 143, 11.6.2003, str. 1.
OJ L 145, 17.6.1993, p. 1.
UL L 145, 17.6.1993, str. 1.
OJ C 230, 26.9.2003, p. 2.
UL C 230, 26.9.2003, str. 2.
OJ C 138, 18.5.2004, p. 2.
UL C 138, 18.5.2004, str. 2.
Council Regulation (EC) No 779/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 779/2005
terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of silicon carbide originating in Ukraine
o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protidampinških ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz silicijevega karbida s poreklom iz Ukrajine
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 11 (3) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 821/94 [2], following an expiry review, the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of silicon carbide originating inter alia in Ukraine (‘the measures’).
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 821/94 [2], ki je sledila pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz silicijevega karbida s poreklom med drugim iz Ukrajine („ukrepe“).
By Regulation (EC) No 1100/2000 [3], following an expiry review, requested by the European Chemical Industry Council (‘CEFIC’) the Council maintained the measures at their original level.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1100/2000 [3], ki je sledila pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa, ki ga je zahteval Svet evropske kemijske industrije („CEFIC“), je Svet ohranil ukrepe na njihovi prvotni ravni.
By Regulation (EC) No 991/2004 [4] the Council amended Regulation (EC) No 1100/2000 as a consequence of the enlargement of the European Union by the accession of 10 new Member States on 1 May 2004 (the ‘EU 10’) in order to provide, in the event of an undertaking being accepted by the Commission, for the possibility to exempt imports to the Community made under the terms of such undertaking from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1100/2000.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 991/2004 [4] je Svet spremenil Uredbo (ES) št. 1100/2000 zaradi širitve Evropske unije s pristopom 10 novih držav članic 1. maja 2004 („EU 10“), da bi v primeru, če Komisija sprejme zavezo, zagotovil možnost oprostitve protidampinških dajatev, predpisanih z Uredbo (ES) št. 1100/2000, pri uvozu v Skupnost pod pogoji takšne zaveze.
By Decisions 2004/498/EC [5] and 2004/782/EC [6], the Commission accepted the undertakings offered by the Ukrainian exporting producer Open Joint Stock Company ‘Zaporozhsky Abrasivny Combinat’ (‘ZAC’).
Z Uredbo 2004/498/ES [5] in 2004/782/ES [6] je Komisija sprejela zaveze, ki jih je ponudil ukrajinski proizvajalec – izvoznik, odprta delniška družba „Zaporozhsky Abrasivny Combinat“ („ZAC“).
The actual rate of the duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, is 24 % for imports of silicon carbide originating in Ukraine.
Dejanska stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja na neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, neocarinjeno, je 24 % za uvoz silicijevega karbida s poreklom iz Ukrajine.
Current investigation
Trenutna preiskava
The Commission received a request lodged by ZAC (‘the applicant’) for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je prejela zahtevek, ki ga je vložil ZAC („vlagatelj“) za delni vmesni pregled skladno s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The request was based on the prima facie evidence, provided by the applicant, that the circumstances on the basis of which measures were established have changed and that these changes are of lasting nature.
Zahtevek je temeljil na prima facie dokazu, ki ga je priskrbel vlagatelj, da so se spremenile okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili sprejeti ukrepi, in da so te spremembe trajne narave.
The applicant alleged, inter alia, that the circumstances with regard to market economy status (‘MES’) had changed significantly.
Vlagatelj je med drugim trdil, da so se znatno spremenile okoliščine glede statusa tržnega gospodarstva („STG“).
In particular, the applicant argued that it now fulfilled the requirements to be granted MES pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Vlagatelj je zlasti dokazoval, da je zdaj izpolnil zahteve za podelitev STG skladno s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe.
Furthermore, the applicant provided evidence showing that a comparison of normal value based on its own cost/domestic prices and its export prices to the USA as a third country market comparable to the EU, would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measure.
Poleg tega je vlagatelj priskrbel dokaz, da bi primerjava normalne vrednosti na podlagi njegovega lastnega stroška/domačih cen, in njegovih izvoznih cen v ZDA kot trg tretjih držav, primerljiv z EU, vodila k zmanjševanju dampinga bistveno pod ravnijo trenutnega ukrepa.
Accordingly, the applicant alleged that the continued imposition of the measure at its current level was no longer necessary to offset dumping.
Skladno s tem je vlagatelj trdil, da ohranitev ukrepa na trenutni ravni za izravnavo dampinga ni več potrebna.
The Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, initiated on 7 January 2004 by notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7] a partial interim review limited in scope to the examination of dumping and MES as far as ZAC is concerned.
Komisija je po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom 7. januarja 2004 z obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7] začela delni vmesni pregled, ki je bil omejen na preiskavo dampinga in STG v zvezi z ZAC.
The Commission sent a questionnaire and a claim form for MES pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation to the applicant.
Komisija je vlagatelju poslala vprašalnik in obrazec za zahtevek za STG skladno s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the determination of dumping and MES.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bili po njenem mnenju potrebne za določitev dampinga in STG.
A verification visit was carried out at the premises of the applicant.
Obisk zaradi preveritve je bil izveden v prostorih vlagatelja.
The investigation of dumping covered the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga zajema obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2003 (v nadaljevanju „obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The Commission officially advised the exporting producer, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers of the initiation of the review.
Komisija je uradno seznanila proizvajalca – izvoznika, predstavnike države izvoznice in proizvajalce Skupnosti o začetku pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing, to submit information and to provide supporting evidence and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresirane stranke so imele možnost, da svoja mnenja izrazijo pisno, da predložijo informacije in da priskrbijo podporne dokaze ter da zahtevajo zaslišanje v roku, določenemu v obvestilu o začetku.
All interested parties who so requested and showed that there were reasons why they should be heard were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam je bilo na zahtevo in z izkazanimi razlogi, zakaj naj bi bile zaslišane, odobreno zaslišanje.
In this regard, the following interested parties made their views known:
V zvezi s tem so izrazile svoje mnenja naslednje zainteresirane stranke:
Community producers Association:
Združenje proizvajalcev Skupnosti:
European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC)
Svet evropske kemijske industrije (CEFIC)
Best-Business, Kunštát na Moravě, Czech Republic
Best-Business, Kunštát na Moravě, Češka
Exporting producer:
Proizvajalec – izvoznik:
Zaporozhsky Abrasivny Combinat, Zaporozhye, Ukraine
Zaporozhsky Abrasivny Combinat, Zaporožje, Ukrajina
Producers in analogue countries:
Proizvajalca v primerljivih državah:
Volzhsky Abrasive, Volshsky, Volgograd Region, Russia
Volzhsky Abrasive, Volšskij, regija Volgograd, Rusija
Saint-Gobain Materiais Cerâmicos Ltda, Barbacena, Brazil.
Saint-Gobain Materiais Cerâmicos Ltda, Barbacena, Brazilija.
The product concerned by this proceeding is silicon carbide, falling within CN code 28492000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘silicon carbide’ or the ‘product concerned’).
Izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta postopek, je silicijev karbid, ki spada pod oznako KN 28492000 (v nadaljevanju „silicijev karbid“ ali „zadevni izdelek“).
No evidence was found suggesting that circumstances with regard to the product concerned had significantly changed since the imposition of the measures.
Nobenega dokaza ni, da so se okoliščine glede zadevnega izdelka znatno spremenile od uvedbe ukrepov.
RESULT OF THE INVESTIGATION
REZULTATI PREISKAVE
In accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the purpose of this type of review is to determine the need for the continued imposition of measures at their current level.
V skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe je namen pregleda takšne vrste določiti potrebo po ohranitvi ukrepov na njihovi trenutni ravni.
In carrying out a partial interim review the Commission may, inter alia, consider whether the circumstances with regard to dumping have changed significantly.
Pri izvajanju delnega vmesnega pregleda Komisija lahko med drugim upošteva, ali so se okoliščine glede dampinga znatno spremenile.
The Commission investigated all claims put forward by the applicant and the circumstances which could have changed significantly since the imposition of the measures: MES individual treatment (‘IT’), the choice of an analogue country and the export prices of the applicant.
Komisija je preučila vse zahtevke, ki jih je predložil vlagatelj, in okoliščine, ki bi se lahko znatno spremenile od uvedbe ukrepov: status tržnega gospodarstva („STG“), individualno obravnavo („IO“), izbiro primerljive države in izvozne cene vlagatelja.
Market Economy Status (MES)
Status tržnega gospodarstva (STG)
The applicant requested MES pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation and submitted the claim form for market economy status within the deadline set out in the notice of initiation.
Vlagatelj je zahteval STG skladno s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe in predložil obrazec za zahtevek za status tržnega gospodarstva v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in Ukraine, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet all five criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi člena 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe je v protidampinških preiskavah o uvozu s poreklom iz Ukrajine normalna vrednost določena v skladu z odstavki od 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, ki izpolnjujejo vseh pet kriterijev, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
The investigation revealed that not all criteria were met by the applicant:
Preiskava je pokazala, da vlagatelj ni izpolnjeval vseh kriterijev:
MES CRITERIA
KRITERIJI STG
Source: verified MES claim form reply of the applicant
Vir: preverjeni odgovor vlagatelja na obrazcu za zahtevek za STG
Article 2(7)(c) indent 1
člen 2(7)(c) alinea 1
Article 2(7)(c) indent 2
člen 2(7)(c) alinea 2
Article 2(7)(c) indent 3
člen 2(7)(c) alinea 3
Article 2(7)(c) indent 4
člen 2(7)(c) alinea 4
Article 2(7)(c) indent 5
člen 2(7)(c) alinea 5
Not met
ni izpolnjen
Met
izpolnjen