natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rights of broadcasting organisations shall expire 50 years after the first transmission of a broadcast, whether this broadcast is transmitted by wire or over the air, including by cable or satellite.
Pravice RTV organizacij trajajo 50 let od prvega radiodifuznega oddajanja ne glede na to, ali to oddajanje poteka po žici ali po radijskih valovih, vključno s kablom ali satelitom.
Protection of previously unpublished works
Varstvo prej neobjavljenih del
Any person who, after the expiry of copyright protection, for the first time lawfully publishes or lawfully communicates to the public a previously unpublished work, shall benefit from a protection equivalent to the economic rights of the author.
Oseba, ki prvič zakonito izda ali priobči javnosti še neobjavljeno delo, na katerem je avtorska pravica že potekla, uživa varstvo, ki je enako materialnim avtorskim pravicam in drugim pravicam avtorja.
The term of protection of such rights shall be 25 years from the time when the work was first lawfully published or lawfully communicated to the public.
Takšne pravice trajajo 25 let od prve zakonite izdaje ali zakonite priobčitve javnosti dela.
Critical and scientific publications
Kritične in znanstvene izdaje
Member States may protect critical and scientific publications of works which have come into the public domain.
Države članice lahko varujejo kritične in znanstvene izdaje del, ki so prišla v prosto uporabo.
The maximum term of protection of such rights shall be 30 years from the time when the publication was first lawfully published.
Takšne pravice trajajo največ 30 let od takrat, ko je kritična ali znanstvena izdaja prvič zakonito izdana.
Protection of photographs
Varstvo fotografij
Photographs which are original in the sense that they are the author's own intellectual creation shall be protected in accordance with Article 1.
Fotografije, ki so izvirne v smislu, da so avtorjeve individualne intelektualne stvaritve, so varovane skladno s členom 1.
No other criteria shall be applied to determine their eligibility for protection.
Za določitev njihove upravičenosti do varstva se ne uporabljajo nobeni drugi kriteriji.
Member States may provide for the protection of other photographs.
Države članice lahko poskrbijo za varstvo drugih fotografij.
Protection vis-à-vis third countries
Varstvo v razmerju do tretjih držav
Where the country of origin of a work, within the meaning of the Berne Convention, is a third country, and the author of the work is not a Community national, the term of protection granted by the Member States shall expire on the date of expiry of the protection granted in the country of origin of the work, but may not exceed the term laid down in Article 1.
Kadar je država izvora dela v pomenu Bernske konvencije tretja država, avtor dela pa ni državljan Skupnosti, traja varstvo pravice, ki ga priznavajo države članice, do dne, ko preneha veljati varstvo v državi, od koder delo izvira, ne sme pa prekoračiti roka, določenega v členu 1.
The terms of protection laid down in Article 3 shall also apply in the case of rightholders who are not Community nationals, provided Member States grant them protection.
Trajanje varstva, določeno v členu 3, velja za imetnike pravic, ki niso državljani Skupnosti, pod pogojem, da jim države članice varstvo priznajo.
However, without prejudice to the international obligations of the Member States, the term of protection granted by Member States shall expire no later than the date of expiry of the protection granted in the country of which the rightholder is a national and may not exceed the term laid down in Article 3.
Brez vpliva na mednarodne obveznosti držav članic pa trajanje varstva, ki ga priznavajo države članice, traja najpozneje do dne, ko preneha veljati varstvo v državi, katere državljan je imetnik pravic, in ne sme preseči roka, določenega v členu 3.
Member States which, on 29 October 1993, in particular pursuant to their international obligations, granted a longer term of protection than that which would result from the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 may maintain this protection until the conclusion of international agreements on the term of protection of copyright or related rights.
Države članice, ki so na dan 29. oktobra 1993, še posebej ob upoštevanju svojih mednarodnih obveznosti, določile daljše trajanje varstva, kot izhaja iz določb, na katere se sklicujeta odstavka 1 in 2, lahko to varstvo ohranijo do sklenitve mednarodnih sporazumov o trajanju varstva avtorske in sorodnih pravic.
Calculation of terms
Računanje trajanja varstva
The terms laid down in this Directive shall be calculated from the first day of January of the year following the event which gives rise to them.
Trajanje varstva iz te direktive začne teči prvega januarja tistega leta, ki sledi dogodku, s katerim je pravica nastala.
Moral rights
Moralne pravice
This Directive shall be without prejudice to the provisions of the Member States regulating moral rights.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na določbe držav članic, ki urejajo moralne pravice.
Where a term of protection which is longer than the corresponding term provided for by this Directive was already running in a Member State on 1 July 1995, this Directive shall not have the effect of shortening that term of protection in that Member State.
Kjer je trajanje varstva, ki ni daljše od ustreznega trajanja, ki ga predpisuje ta direktiva, v državi članici že začelo teči s 1. julijem 1995, ta direktiva ne more skrajšati tega trajanja v tej državi članici.
The terms of protection provided for in this Directive shall apply to all works and subject matter which were protected in at least one Member State on the date referred to in paragraph 1, pursuant to national provisions on copyright or related rights, or which meet the criteria for protection under [Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property].
Trajanje varstva po tej direktivi velja za vsa dela in predmete, varovane v vsaj eni od držav članic na datum iz odstavka 1 v skladu z nacionalnimi določbami o avtorski ali sorodnih pravicah, oziroma za dela, ki ustrezajo kriterijem varstva po Direktivi [Sveta 92/100/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1992 o pravici dajanja v najem in pravici posojanja ter o določenih pravicah, sorodni avtorski na področju intelektualne lastnine].
This Directive shall be without prejudice to any acts of exploitation performed before the date referred to in paragraph 1.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na nobeno dejanje uporabe, ki se izvede pred datumom iz odstavka 1.
Member States shall adopt the necessary provisions to protect in particular acquired rights of third parties.
Države članice sprejmejo nujno potrebne določbe za posebno varstvo pridobljenih pravic tretjih strank.
Member States need not apply the provisions of Article 2(1) to cinematographic or audiovisual works created before 1 July 1994.
Državam članicam ni treba uporabiti določb iz člena 2(1) pri kinematografskih ali avdiovizualnih delih, ki so nastala pred 1. julijem 1994.
Notification and communication
Obvestilo in predložitev
Member States shall immediately notify the Commission of any governmental plan to grant new related rights, including the basic reasons for their introduction and the term of protection envisaged.
Države članice takoj obvestijo Komisijo o vsakršnem zakonskem predlogu za priznanje novih sorodnih pravic, vključno s temeljnimi razlogi za njihovo uvedbo ter predvidenim rokom trajanja.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the provisions of internal law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive.
Države članice predložijo Komisiji besedila predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Directive 93/98/EEC is hereby repealed, without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for transposition into national law, as set out in Part B of Annex I, of the Directives, and their application.
Direktiva 93/98/EGS je razveljavljena, brez poseganja v obveznosti držav članic glede rokov za prenos v nacionalno pravo direktiv, ki so določeni v delu B Priloge I.
Done at Strasbourg, the 12 December 2006.
V Strasbourgu, 12. decembra 2006.
Directive as amended by Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 167, 22.6.2001, p. 10).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 167, 22.6.2001, str. 10).
Directive as last amended by Directive 2001/29/EC.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2001/29/ES.
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Direktiva 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
1 July 1995 (Articles 1 to 11)
julij 1995 (členi 1 do 11)
19 November 1993 (Article 12)
novembra 1993 (člen 12)
1 July 1997 at the latest as regards Article 2(1) (Article 10(5))
najkasneje 1. julija 1997, kar zadeva člen 2(1) (člen 10(5))
Directive 93/98/EEC
Direktiva 93/98/EGS
Articles 1 to 9
Člen 1 do 9
Article 10(1) to (4)
Člen 10(1) do (4)
Article 10(5)
Člen 10(5)
Article 13(1), first subparagraph
Člen 13(1), prvi pododstavek
Article 13(1), second subparagraph
Člen 13(1), drugi pododstavek
Article 13(1), third subparagraph
Člen 13(1), tretji pododstavek
Those works are protected as such, without prejudice to the copyright in each of the works forming part of such collections. Consequently, specific terms of protection may apply to works included in collections.
Ta dela so varovana kot taka, ne glede na avtorsko pravico v vsakem delu, ki sestavlja takšne zbirke, zato za dela, vključena v zbirko, lahko posledično velja posebno trajanje varstva.
Council Directive 2006/117/Euratom
Direktiva Sveta 2006/117/Euratom
on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel
o nadzorovanju in kontroli pošiljk radioaktivnih odpadkov in izrabljenega jedrskega goriva
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 31(2) and 32 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti členov 31(2) in 32 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission drawn up after obtaining the opinion of a group of persons appointed by the Scientific and Technical Committee from among scientific experts in the Member States, in accordance with Article 31 of the Treaty, and after having consulted the European Economic and Social Committee [1],
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, pripravljenega na podlagi mnenja skupine oseb, ki jih je v skladu s členom 31 Pogodbe imenoval Znanstveno-tehnični odbor izmed znanstvenih izvedencev iz držav članic, in po posvetovanju z Evropskim ekonomsko-socialnim odborom [1],
Operations involved in shipments of radioactive waste or spent fuel are subject to a number of requirements under Community and international legal instruments regarding in particular the safe transport of radioactive material and the conditions under which radioactive waste or spent fuel is disposed of or stored in the country of destination.
Za dejavnosti v zvezi s pošiljkami radioaktivnih odpadkov ali izrabljenega goriva veljajo številne zahteve iz pravnih instrumentov Skupnosti in iz mednarodnih pravnih instrumentov, zlasti glede varnega prevoza radioaktivnega materiala in pogojev, pod katerimi se lahko radioaktivni odpadki ali izrabljeno gorivo v namembni državi odlagajo ali shranjujejo.
Further to these requirements, the health protection of workers and the general public requires that shipments of radioactive waste or spent fuel between Member States and into and out of the Community be subject to a compulsory and common system of prior authorisation.
Poleg tega varstvo zdravja delavcev in prebivalstva zahteva, da za pošiljke radioaktivnih odpadkov ali izrabljenega goriva med državami članicami ter v Skupnost in iz nje velja obvezen skupni sistem predhodne odobritve.
As stated in Council Resolution of 22 May 2002 on the establishment of national systems for surveillance and control of the presence of radioactive materials in the recycling of metallic materials in the Member States [3], it is important to minimise the radiological risk deriving from the presence of radioactive materials among metallic materials destined for recycling.
Resolucija Sveta z dne 22. maja 2002 o oblikovanju nacionalnih sistemov za nadzorovanje in kontrolo prisotnosti radioaktivnih materialov v reciklaži kovinskih materialov v državah članicah [3] navaja, da je pomembno, da se radiološko tveganje, ki je posledica prisotnosti radioaktivnih materialov med kovinskimi materiali, namenjenimi za recikliranje, zmanjša na najmanjšo možno mero.
Council Directive 92/3/Euratom of 3 February 1992 on the supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste between Member States and into and out of the Community [4] established a Community system of strict control and prior authorisation for shipments of radioactive waste that has proved satisfactory.
Direktiva Sveta 92/3/Euratom z dne 3. februarja 1992 o nadzorovanju in kontroli pošiljk radioaktivnih odpadkov med državami članicami ter v Skupnost in iz nje [4] je vzpostavila sistem Skupnosti za strogo kontrolo in predhodno odobritev pošiljk radioaktivnih odpadkov, ki se je izkazal kot zadovoljiv.
It needs, nevertheless, to be amended in the light of experience in order to clarify and add concepts and definitions, to address situations that had been omitted in the past, to simplify the existing procedure for the shipment of radioactive waste between Member States and to guarantee consistency with other Community and international provisions, and in particular with the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management (hereinafter referred to as Joint Convention), to which the Community acceded on 2 January 2006.
Vseeno pa bi ga bilo treba glede na pridobljene izkušnje spremeniti, da se razjasnijo in dodajo nekateri koncepti in opredelitve pojmov, uredijo primeri, ki so bili v preteklosti izpuščeni, poenostavi obstoječi postopek pošiljanja radioaktivnih odpadkov med državami članicami ter zagotovi usklajenost z drugimi določbami Skupnosti in mednarodnimi določbami, zlasti s Skupno konvencijo o varnosti ravnanja z izrabljenim gorivom in varnosti ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Skupna konvencija“), h kateri je Skupnost pristopila 2. januarja 2006.
In the framework of the Fifth Phase of the SLIM (Simpler Legislation for the Internal Market) initiative, a working group of representatives of Member States and of users was set up in order to address a number of concerns expressed by users of Directive 92/3/Euratom, while bringing it into line with current international rules and instruments.
V okviru pete faze pobude SLIM (enostavnejša zakonodaja za notranji trg) je bila vzpostavljena delovna skupina predstavnikov držav članic in uporabnikov zakonodaje, da bi preučila določene težave, na katere so opozorili uporabniki Direktive 92/3/Euratom, in slednjo uskladila s trenutnimi mednarodnimi pravili in instrumenti.
The procedure laid down in Directive 92/3/Euratom has been applied in practice only to shipments of spent fuel for which no further use is intended, considered thus as ‘radioactive waste’ for the purposes of that Directive.
Postopek, določen v Direktivi 92/3/Euratom je bil v praksi uporabljen samo za pošiljke izrabljenega goriva, za katerega ni predvidena nobena nadaljnja uporaba in ki se zato za namene omenjene direktive šteje za „radioaktivni odpadek“.
From a radiological point of view, excluding the application of such supervision and control procedure to spent fuel where it is intended for reprocessing is not justified.
Iz radiološkega stališča je izključitev uporabe takih postopkov nadzora in kontrol za izrabljeno gorivo, kadar je to namenjeno predelavi, neupravičena.
It is therefore appropriate that this Directive cover all shipments of spent fuel, whether it is intended for disposal or for reprocessing.
Zato je primerno, da ta direktiva zajema vse pošiljke izrabljenega goriva, ne glede na to, ali je namenjeno odlaganju ali predelavi.
Any refusal of such shipments should be justified on the basis of the criteria set out in this Directive.
Vsaka zavrnitev takih pošiljk mora biti upravičena na podlagi meril, določenih v tej direktivi.
Simplification of the existing procedure should not hamper the existing rights of the Member States to object to, or impose conditions in relation to, a shipment of radioactive waste which require their consent.
Poenostavitev obstoječega postopka ne bi smela ovirati obstoječih pravic držav članic, da pošiljki radioaktivnih odpadkov, za katero je potrebno njihovo soglasje, ugovarjajo ali zanjo določijo pogoje.
Objections should not be arbitrary and should be founded on relevant national, Community or international law.
Ugovori ne bi smeli biti samovoljni, ampak bi morali temeljiti na ustreznih nacionalnih predpisih, predpisih Skupnosti ali mednarodnih predpisih.
This Directive should be without prejudice to rights and obligations under international law, and in particular to the exercise, by ships and aircraft, of maritime, river and air navigation rights and freedoms, as provided for under international law.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v pravice in obveznosti po mednarodnem pravu, in zlasti ne v izvrševanje pravic in svoboščin, določenih v mednarodnem pravu, ki zadevajo morsko in rečno ladijsko plovbo ter zračno letalsko plovbo.
The possibility for a Member State of destination or of transit to refuse the automatic procedure for granting consent to shipments imposes an unjustified administrative burden and generates uncertainty.
Možnost namembne države članice ali države članice tranzita, da zavrne avtomatični postopek soglasja glede pošiljk, nalaga neupravičeno upravno breme in ustvarja negotovost.
The mandatory acknowledgement of receipt of the application by the authorities of the countries of destination and transit, together with the extension of the period for granting consent, should allow tacit approval to be assumed with a high degree of certainty.
Obvezno izdajanje potrdil o prejemu vlog s strani pristojnih organov namembnih držav in držav tranzita bi moralo, ob podaljšanju roka za soglasje, omogočiti, da se tiha odobritev domneva z visoko stopnjo gotovosti.
The ‘authorisations’ for shipments in the sense of this Directive should not replace any specific national requirements for the shipments such as transport licences.
„Dovoljenja“ za pošiljke v smislu te direktive ne bi smela nadomestiti posebnih nacionalnih zahtev za pošiljke, kot so na primer licence za prevoz.
To protect human health and the environment against the dangers arising from radioactive waste, account should be taken of risks occurring outside the Community.
Da bi zavarovali zdravje ljudi in okolje pred nevarnostmi, ki izvirajo iz radioaktivnih odpadkov, bi bilo treba upoštevati tveganje, ki nastaja zunaj Skupnosti.
In the case of radioactive waste and spent fuel leaving the Community, the third country of destination should not only be informed of the shipment, but should also give its consent to it.
Pri radioaktivnih odpadkih in izrabljenem gorivu, ki zapušča Skupnost, bi morala biti tretja namembna država o pošiljki ne le obveščena, ampak bi morala dati tudi svoje soglasje.
The competent authorities of the Member State of destination should cooperate and liaise with the other competent authorities involved in order to avoid undue delays and to ensure a smooth operation of the consent procedure laid down by this Directive.
Pristojni organi namembne države članice bi morali sodelovati in se povezovati z drugimi udeleženimi pristojnimi organi, da se preprečijo nepotrebne zamude in zagotovi nemoten potek postopka soglasja, ki ga določa ta direktiva.
The requirement that the person responsible for the shipment take corrective safety measures where necessary in case of shipment failure should not prevent the application of mechanisms established by the Member States at national level.
Zahteva, da mora oseba, odgovorna za pošiljko, v primeru neuspele pošiljke po potrebi sprejeti ustrezne prilagoditvene varnostne ukrepe, ne bi smela preprečevati uporabe mehanizmov, ki so jih na nacionalni ravni uvedle države članice.
The requirement that the holder be liable for costs arising in case of shipment failure should not prevent that mechanisms established by the Member States at national level or any contractual arrangement between the holder and any other person involved in the shipment, apply.
Zahteva, da mora stroške, ki nastanejo v primeru neuspele pošiljke, kriti imetnik, ne sme preprečevati uporabe mehanizmov, ki so jih na nacionalni ravni uvedle države članice, ali kakršnega koli pogodbenega dogovora med imetnikom in katero koli drugo osebo, udeleženo pri pošiljki.
While radioactive waste should, as far as is compatible with the safe management of such material, be disposed of in the State in which it was generated it is recognized that Member States should promote agreements between themselves in order to facilitate the safe and efficient management of radioactive waste or spent fuel from Member States that produced it in small quantities and where the establishment of appropriate facilities would not be justified from a radiological point of view.
Medtem ko naj bi se radioaktivni odpadki, kolikor je to v skladu z varnim ravnanjem s takim materialom, odlagali v državi, v kateri so nastali, pa morajo države članice med seboj spodbujati dogovore, ki omogočajo varno in učinkovito ravnanje z radioaktivnimi odpadki ali izrabljenim gorivom iz držav članic, kjer se odpadki proizvajajo v majhnih količinah in kjer izgradnja ustreznih objektov ne bi bila upravičena iz radiološkega stališča.
When an arrangement between a consignee in a third country and a holder in a third country has been concluded pursuant to Article 27 of the Joint Convention, the same arrangement could be used for the purpose of this Directive.
Če je bil med prejemnikom v tretji državi in imetnikom v tretji državi sklenjen dogovor v skladu s členom 27 Skupne konvencije, se lahko isti dogovor uporabi za namene te direktive.
For the purposes of this Directive and in the light of past experience it is appropriate to adapt the existing standard document.
Za namene te direktive in glede na pretekle izkušnje je primerno prilagoditi obstoječo standardno listino.
For the sake of clarity the obligation to establish the new standard document by the date of transposition of this Directive should be laid down.
Zaradi jasnosti bi bilo treba določiti obveznost, da se nova standardna listina pripravi do dne prenosa te direktive.
However, should this deadline not be met, transitional provisions should provide for the use of the existing standard document.
Za primer, da standardna listina ne bo pripravljena v tem roku, pa bi morale prehodne določbe predpisati, da se še naprej uporablja obstoječa standardna listina.
Moreover, clear rules on the use of languages should allow for legal certainty and prevent unjustified delays.
Poleg tega bi morala jasna pravila o uporabi jezikov zagotoviti pravno varnost in preprečiti neupravičene zamude.
Periodical reporting from Member States to the Commission and from the Commission to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee should provide a useful overview of authorisations given Community-wide and should identify possible difficulties encountered in practice by the Member States and solutions applied.
Redno poročanje držav članic Komisiji in Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru bi moralo zagotoviti koristen pregled nad dovoljenji, ki so se izdala v Skupnosti, in omogočiti opredelitev možnih težav, s katerimi se v praksi srečujejo države članice, ter nad uporabljenimi rešitvami.