natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Crisis distillation as provided for in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 is hereby opened for a maximum of 200000 hectolitres of table wine in Portugal, in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 concerning this type of distillation.
Krizna destilacija iz člena 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 se s to uredbo odpre za največ 200000 hektolitrov namiznega vina na Portugalskem v skladu z določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 1623/2000 za to vrsto destilacije.
Producers may conclude delivery contracts as provided for in Article 65 of Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the contract’) from 16 August to 15 September 2006.
Vsak proizvajalec lahko od 16. avgusta 2006 do 15. septembra 2006 sklene pogodbo o dostavi iz člena 65 Uredbe (ES) št. 1623/2000 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „pogodba“).
If the total quantity covered by the contracts submitted to the intervention agency exceeds the quantity laid down in Article 1, Portugal shall determine the rate of reduction to be applied to the above contracts.
Če skupna količina iz pogodb, predloženih intervencijski agenciji, presega količino iz člena 1, država članica določi stopnjo znižanja, ki se uporabi za navedene pogodbe.
Portugal shall take the administrative steps necessary to approve the contracts by 31 October 2006 at the latest.
Država članica sprejme potrebne upravne določbe, da najpozneje do 31. oktobra 2006 odobri pogodbe.
Portugal shall notify the Commission before 15 November 2006 of the quantities of wine covered by approved contracts.
Država članica do 15. novembra 2006 sporoči Komisiji količino vina, zajetega v odobrenih pogodbah.
Portugal may limit the number of contracts that individual producers may conclude under this Regulation.
Država članica lahko omeji število pogodb, ki jih lahko posamezni proizvajalec sklene v okviru te uredbe.
The quantities of wine covered by approved contracts shall be delivered to the distilleries by 15 February 2007 at the latest.
Količine vina iz odobrenih pogodb se v destilarne dostavijo najpozneje do 15. februarja 2007.
The alcohol obtained must be delivered to the intervention agency in accordance with Article 6(1) by 15 May 2007 at the latest.
Pridobljeni alkohol mora biti v skladu s členom 6(1) v intervencijsko agencijo dostavljen najpozneje do 15. maja 2007.
The minimum price paid for wine delivered for distillation under this Regulation shall be EUR 1,914 per % volume per hectolitre.
Najnižja odkupna cena za vino, dobavljeno za destilacijo v skladu s to uredbo, je 1,914 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
That product shall be of an alcoholic strength of at least 92 % volume.
Ta proizvod mora vsebovati volumenski delež alkohola najmanj 92 vol. %.
The price the intervention agency must pay distillers for raw alcohol delivered shall be EUR 2,281 per % volume per hectolitre.
Cena, ki jo intervencijska agencija plača destilarni za dostavljeni surovi alkohol, znaša 2,281 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
Distillers may receive an advance of EUR 1,122 per % volume per hectolitre on that amount.
Destilarna lahko na ta znesek prejme predujem 1,122 EUR na vol. % na hektoliter.
It shall apply from 16 August 2006.
Uporablja se od 16. avgusta 2006.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1820/2005 of 8 November 2005 (OJ L 293, 9.11.2005, p. 8).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1820/2005 (UL L 293, 9.11.2005, str. 8).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1195/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1195/2006
amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on persistent organic pollutants
o spremembi Priloge IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalih
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 [1], and in particular Article 7(4)(a) and Article 14(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004 [1], in zlasti členov 7(4)(a) in 14(3) Uredbe,
The Commission conducted a study on the implementation of waste-related provisions of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004.
Komisija je opravila študijo o izvajanju določb Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004 v zvezi z ravnanjem z odpadki.
The proposed concentration limits in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 are considered the most appropriate to ensure a high level of protection of human health and the environment in view of the destruction or irreversible transformation of the persistent organic pollutants.
Predlagane mejne koncentracijske vrednosti iz Priloge IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 se štejejo kot najustreznejše za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varovanja zdravja ljudi in varovanja okolja glede uničenja ali trajne pretvorbe obstojnih organskih onesnaževal.
For toxaphene, a mixture of over 670 substances, no agreed and relevant analytical methodology to determine the total concentration is available.
Za toksafen, mešanico več kot 670 snovi, ni na voljo nobene dogovorjene in ustrezne analitične metodologije za določitev skupne koncentracije.
However, the above mentioned study did not identify any stocks consisting of, containing or contaminated with toxaphene in the European Union.
Vendar zgoraj navedena študija ni ugotovila zalog v Evropski uniji, ki bi vsebovale toksafen ali bile kontaminirane z njim.
In addition, the study demonstrated that, whenever any persistent organic pollutant pesticides were detected in wastes, their concentrations were usually high when compared with the proposed concentration limits.
Poleg tega je študija pokazala, da so koncentracije vseh ugotovljenih obstojnih organskih onesnaževalnih pesticidov v odpadkih v primerjavi s predlaganimi mejnimi koncentracijskimi vrednostmi ponavadi visoke.
For the time being, the available analytical methodologies for the determination of toxaphene may be considered adequate for the purposes of this Regulation.
Zato lahko razpoložljive analitične metodologije za določitev toksafena zaenkrat veljajo kot dovolj ustrezne za namen te uredbe.
The concentration limit for PCDF/PCDD is expressed in toxic equivalent concentration (‘TEQ’), using the 1998 World Health Organisation toxic equivalency factors (‘TEFs’).
Mejna koncentracijska vrednost za PCDF/PCDD je ob uporabi faktorjev ekvivalence toksičnosti („TEF“) Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije iz leta 1998 izražena v koncentraciji toksičnih ekvivalentov („TEQ“).
Available data on dioxin-like PCBs are not sufficient to include these compounds in the TEQ.
Razpoložljivi podatki o dioksinu podobnih PCB ne zadostujejo za vključitev teh sestavin v TEQ.
Hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) is the name of a technical mixture of various isomers.
Heksaklorocikloheksan (HCH) je ime za tehnično mešanico različnih izomerov.
The effort to completely analyse them would be disproportionate.
Njihova popolna analiza bi predstavljala nesorazmeren napor.
Only alpha-, beta- and gamma-HCH is of toxicological relevance.
Toksikološko pomembni so samo alfa, beta in gama-HCH.
Therefore, the concentration limit exclusively refers to them.
Zato se mejna koncentracijska vrednost nanaša izključno nanje.
Most commercially available analytical standard mixtures for the analysis of this compound class only identify these isomers.
Večina analitičnih standardnih mešanic za analize te vrste spojin, ki so na voljo na tržišču, je namenjena ugotavljanju teh izomerov.
Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 850/2004 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The Committee provided for in Article 17(1) of Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 has not delivered an opinion on the measures laid down in this Regulation, following its consultation, on 25 January 2006, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 17(2) of that Regulation,
Odbor iz člena 17(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 850/2004 po posvetovanju 25. januarja 2006 ni podal mnenja o ukrepih, določenih v tej uredbi Komisije, po postopku iz člena 17(2) navedene uredbe –
The Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 shall be replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 850/2004 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej uredbi.
OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 7. Corrected version in OJ L 229, 29.6.2004, p. 5.
UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str. 7.
List of substances subject to waste management provisions set out in article 7
Seznam snovi, za katere veljajo določbe o ravnanju z odpadki iz člena 7
Concentration limit referred to in Article 7(4)(a)
Mejna koncentracijska vrednost iz člena 7(4)(a)
1336-36-3 and others
1336-36-3 in drugi
DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane)
DDT 1,1,1-trikloro-2,2-bis-(4-klorofenil) etan)
Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDF)
Poliklorirani dibenzo-p-dioksini in dibenzofurani (PCDD/PCDF)
The sum of alpha, beta- and gamma-HCH
alfa, beta in gama-HCH skupaj
Hexabromobiphenyl
Heksabrombifenil
Where applicable, the calculation method laid down in European standards EN 12766-1 and EN 12766-2 shall be applied.
Kadar je primerno, se uporabi metoda izračuna iz standardov EN 12766-1 in EN 12766-2.
The limit is calculated as PCDD and PCDF according to the following toxic equivalency factors (TEFs):TEFPCDD2,3,7,8-TeCDD11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD11,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD0,11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD0,11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD0,11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD0,01OCDD0,0001PCDF2,3,7,8-TeCDF0,11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF0,052,3,4,7,8-PeCDF0,51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF0,12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF0,011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF0,01OCDF0,0001’
Mejna vrednost se izračuna kot PCDD in PCDF glede na faktorje ekvivalence toksičnosti (TEF):TEFPCDD2,3,7,8-TeCDD11,2,3,7,8-PeCDD11,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD0,11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD0,11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD0,11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD0,01OCDD0,0001PCDF2,3,7,8-TeCDF0,11,2,3,7,8-PeCDF0,052,3,4,7,8-PeCDF0,51,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF0,12,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF0,11,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF0,011,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF0,01OCDF0,0001“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1196/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1196/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 August 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 8. avgusta 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 7 August 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 7. avgusta 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1197/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1197/2006
amending Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases
o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2967/85 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in pigmeat [1], and in particular Articles 2 and 4(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2759/75 z dne 29. oktobra 1975 o skupni tržni ureditvi za prašičje meso [1], in zlasti členov 2 in 4(6) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 of 13 November 1984 determining the Community scale for grading pig carcases [2], and in particular Article 5(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3220/84 z dne 13. novembra 1984 o določitvi lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov [2], in zlasti člena 5(1) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 [3] lays down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases, and in particular the method for assessing the lean meat content of pig carcases.
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2967/85 [3] določa natančna pravila za uporabo lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov in zlasti način ocenjevanja mesnatosti prašičjih trupov.
The results of recent research regarding the grading of pig carcases, in particular in the framework of the EUPIGCLASS project, have underlined the importance to improve the quality of sampling and to simplify the method for assessing the lean meat content of pig carcases.
Rezultati zadnjih raziskav glede razvrščanja prašičjih trupov, zlasti v okviru projekta EUPIGCLASS, so poudarili, da je treba izboljšati kakovost vzorčenja in poenostaviti način ocenjevanja mesnatosti prašičjih trupov.
The method for assessing the lean meat content of pig carcases and the calculation of the reference lean meat percentage laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 should therefore be adapted.
Način ocenjevanja mesnatosti trupov in izračun referenčnega odstotka mesnatosti, določena v Uredbi (EGS) št. 2967/85, je zato treba prilagoditi.
Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (EGS) št. 2967/85 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 is amended as follows:
Uredba (EGS) št. 2967/85 se spremeni:
In Article 3, paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:
Odstavka 1 in 2 člena 3 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
The standard statistical method for assessing the lean meat content of pig carcases authorised as a grading method within the meaning of Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 shall be either ordinary least squares or rank reduced methods, but other statistically proven methods may be used.
Standardne statistične metode ocenjevanja mesnatosti prašičjih trupov, odobrene kot metode razvrščanja v smislu člena 2(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3220/84, so običajne metode najmanjših kvadratov ali metode zmanjšanega razvrščanja, uporabljajo pa se lahko tudi druge statistično preverjene metode.
The method shall be based on a representative sample of the national or regional pigmeat production concerned, consisting of at least 120 carcases whose lean meat content has been ascertained in accordance with the dissection method laid down in Annex I to this Regulation.
Metoda temelji na reprezentativnem vzorcu nacionalne ali regionalne proizvodnje prašičjega mesa, ki obsega vsaj 120 trupov, katerih mesnatost je bila potrjena v skladu z načinom razseka iz Priloge I k tej uredbi.
If multiple sampling methods are used, the reference shall be measured on at least 50 carcases and the precision shall be at least equal to that obtained using the standard statistical method on 120 carcases using the method in Annex I.
Pri uporabi metod večkratnega vzorčenja je treba referenco meriti na najmanj 50 trupih, natančnost pa mora biti vsaj taka, kot jo zagotavlja uporaba standardne statistične metode na 120 trupih ob uporabi metode iz Priloge I.
Grading methods shall be authorised only if the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP), computed by a full cross-validation technique, is less than 2,5.
Metode razvrščanja se odobrijo samo, če je koren povprečne kvadratne napake napovedi (RMSEP), izračunan z metodo popolne navzkrižne validacije, manjši kot 2,5.
In addition, any outliers shall be included in the calculation of RMSEP.’.
V izračun RMSEP je treba vključiti tudi osamelce.“
in Annex I, point 2 is replaced by the following:
Točka 2 Priloge I se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The reference lean meat percentage is calculated as follows:
Referenčni odstotek mesnatosti se izračuna na naslednji način:
y = 0,89 × 100 × Weight of tender loin + weight of lean (fascia included) in shoulder, loin, ham and belly
y = 0,89 × 100 × masa fileja + masa mišic (z vezivnimi tkivi) plečeta, ledja, stegna in trebuha
Weight of tender loin + weight of dissected cuts
masa fileja + masa razkosanih delov
The weight of the lean in those four cuts will be calculated by subtracting the total of the non-lean elements of the four cuts from the total weight of the cuts before dissection.’.
Masa mišic v teh štirih delih se izračuna tako, da se od skupne mase delov pred razkosanjem odšteje skupna masa teh štirih delov, ki niso mišice.“
It shall apply to grading methods for which authorisation is requested, as provided in Article 3(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85, as from 1 July 2006.
Uporablja se pri metodah razvrščanja, za katere se zahteva dovoljenje, kot je določeno v členu 3(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2967/85 z dne 1. julija 2006.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006
on the European Fisheries Fund
o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo
The development of the Community fishing fleet must be regulated in particular according to decisions that the Council and the Commission are called upon to take by virtue of Chapter II of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy [4].
Razvoj ribiške flote Skupnosti je treba urejati zlasti v skladu z odločitvami, ki jih morata Svet in Komisija sprejeti na temelju poglavja II Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike [4].
The objective of the common fisheries policy should be to provide for sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources and of aquaculture in the context of sustainable development, taking account of environmental, economic and social aspects in a balanced manner.
Cilj skupne ribiške politike naj bi bil omogočati trajnostno izkoriščanje živih vodnih virov in ribogojstva v smislu trajnostnega razvoja, ob uravnoteženem upoštevanju okoljskih, gospodarskih in družbenih vidikov.
The scope of the common fisheries policy extends to the conservation, management and exploitation of living aquatic resources and aquaculture, as well as to the processing and marketing of fisheries and aquaculture products in so far as those activities are practised on the territory of Member States, in Community waters or by Community fishing vessels or nationals of Member States.
Obseg skupne ribiške politike vključuje ohranjevanje, upravljanje in izkoriščanje živih vodnih virov in ribogojstva, kot tudi predelavo in trženje ribiških in ribogojnih proizvodov, v kolikor se te dejavnosti izvajajo na ozemlju držav članic, v vodah Skupnosti ali jih izvajajo ribiška plovila Skupnosti ali državljani držav članic.
Under Article 33(2) of the Treaty, account must be taken of the particular nature of the activity which results from the social structure of the sector and from structural and natural disparities between the various regions involved in fishing activities.
V skladu s členom 33(2) Pogodbe je treba upoštevati značilno naravo te dejavnosti, ki je posledica družbene strukture sektorja in strukturnih in naravnih razlik med raznimi območji, ki se ukvarjajo z ribolovnimi dejavnostmi.
The sustainable development component of the common fisheries policy has been integrated into the rules governing the Structural Funds since 1993.
Element trajnostnega razvoja skupne ribiške politike je že od leta 1993 vključen v predpise, ki urejajo strukturne sklade.
Its implementation should be pursued in the context of sustainable development by means of the European Fisheries Fund (hereinafter EFF).
Njegovo izvajanje mora potekati v okviru trajnostnega razvoja s pomočjo Evropskega sklada za ribištvo (v nadaljevanju „ESR“).
Since the principal objective of this Regulation, namely to further the common fisheries policy, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States given the structural problems encountered in the development of the fisheries sector and the limits on the financial resources of the Member States in an enlarged Union, and can therefore be better achieved at Community level by providing multi-annual financing focused on the relevant priorities, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker cilja te uredbe, in sicer nadaljnjega razvoja skupne ribiške politike, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči zaradi strukturnih težav, s katerimi so soočene pri razvoju ribiškega sektorja in zaradi omejenih finančnih virov, ki so državam članicam dostopni v razširjeni Uniji, in ker ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa lažje doseže Skupnost z zagotovitvijo večletnega financiranja na ravni Skupnosti, osredotočeno na ustrezne prednostne naloge, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve this objective.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta uredba ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenega cilja.
The common fisheries policy and therefore the EFF must incorporate the Community's priorities for sustainable development as defined in the conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000 and the Gothenburg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001.
Skupna ribiška politika in tudi ESR morata vključevati prednostne naloge Skupnosti za trajnostni razvoj, kakor so opredeljeni v zaključkih Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000 in Evropskega sveta v Göteborgu z dne 15. in 16. junija 2001.
Programming should ensure coordination of the EFF with other funds geared to sustainable development and with the Structural Funds and other Community funds.
Programiranje bi moralo zagotoviti uskladitev ESR z drugimi skladi, ki so vezani na trajnostni razvoj, ter s strukturnimi skladi in drugimi skladi Skupnosti.
The activity of the EFF and the operations it helps to finance should be compatible with other Community policies and comply with all Community legislation.
Dejavnost ESR in projekti, ki jih pomaga financirati, bi morali biti združljivi z ostalimi politikami Skupnosti in v skladu z vso zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Action by the Community should be complementary to action carried out by Member States or it should seek to contribute to that action.
Ukrepi Skupnosti bi morali dopolnjevati ukrepe držav članic ali prispevati k njim.
In order to ensure significant added value partnership should be strengthened.
Za zagotovitev znatne dodane vrednosti bi bilo treba okrepiti partnerstvo.
This partnership, with full regard to the national rules and practices of the Member States, concerns regional, local and other public authorities, as well as other appropriate bodies, including those responsible for the environment and for the promotion of equality between men and women, the economic and social partners and other competent bodies.
To partnerstvo, ki v celoti upošteva nacionalne predpise in prakse držav članic, zadeva regionalne in lokalne organe ter druge organe javne oblasti, kakor tudi druge ustrezne organe, vključno s tistimi, ki so pristojni za okolje in za spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami, gospodarske in socialne partnerje ter druge pristojne organe.
The partners concerned should be involved in the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of assistance.
Zadevni partnerji bi morali sodelovati pri pripravi, izvajanju, spremljanju in vrednotenju pomoči.
Under Article 274 of the Treaty, Member States are to cooperate with the Commission to ensure compliance with the principles of sound financial management.
V skladu s členom 274 Pogodbe morajo države članice sodelovati s Komisijo, da se zagotovi skladnost z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja.
To that end this Regulation specifies the conditions allowing the Commission to exercise its responsibilities for the execution of the general budget of the European Union.
V ta namen ta uredba določa pogoje, ki omogočajo Komisiji izvajanje odgovornosti glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije.
If the activities of the EFF are to be effective and transparent, the responsibilities of the Member States and of the Community should be precisely defined.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti in preglednosti delovanja ESR bi bilo treba natančno določiti pristojnosti držav članic in Skupnosti.
Those responsibilities should be specified for each stage of programming, monitoring, evaluation and control.
Te odgovornosti bi bilo treba določiti za vsako stopnjo programiranja, spremljanja, vrednotenja in nadzora.
Without prejudice to the powers vested in the Commission, implementing and inspecting assistance should be primarily the responsibility of the Member States.
Brez poseganja v pristojnosti Komisije je izvajanje in nadzor pomoči v prvi vrsti v pristojnosti držav članic.
Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty provide for the elimination of inequalities, and the promotion of equality, between men and women.
Člena 2 in 3 Pogodbe zagotavljata odpravo neenakosti in spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami.