natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Treatment of the sample as received in the laboratory
Priprava laboratorijskega vzorca
Finely grind (where relevant) and mix thoroughly the complete aggregate sample using a process that has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation.
Drobno zmleti (kjer je ustrezno) in dobro premešati celoten sestavljeni vzorec po postopku, s katerim se dokazano doseže popolna homogenizacija.
Subdivision of samples for enforcement and defence purposes
Razdelitev vzorcev za uradni nadzor ali drugo mnenje
The replicate samples for enforcement, trade (defence) and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised material unless this conflicts with Member States’ rules on sampling.
Enakovredni vzorci za uradni nadzor, za nosilca dejavnosti za drugo mnenje in za postopke na sodišču se vzamejo iz homogeniziranega sestavljenega vzorca, če to ni v nasprotju s predpisi držav članic o vzorčenju.
Method of analysis to be used by the laboratory and laboratory control requirements
Metoda analize, ki jo uporablja laboratorij in zahteve laboratorijskega nadzora
A number of the most commonly used definitions that the laboratory will be required to use are given below:
V nadaljevanju so navedene nekatere najsplošnejše opredelitve, ki jih bo laboratorij uporabljal:
r Repeatability, the value below which the absolute difference between two single test results obtained under repeatability conditions (i.e., same sample, same operator, same apparatus, same laboratory, and short interval of time) may be expected to lie within a specific probability (typically 95 %) and hence r = 2.8 × sr
r Ponovljivost, vrednost manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preskusa, dobljenih pod ponovljivimi pogoji (t. j. isti vzorec, isti analitik, ista aparatura, isti laboratorij in kratek časovni razmik), za katero se pričakuje, da bo dobljena z verjetnostjo 95 % in zato je r = 2.8 × sr
Standard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions.
Standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti.
Relative standard deviation, calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions sr
Relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih ponovljivosti sr
R Reproducibility, the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained under reproducibility conditions (i.e., on identical material obtained by operators in different laboratories, using the standardised test method), may be expected to lie within a certain probability (typically 95 %); R = 2.8 × sR
R obnovljivost, vrednost manjša od absolutne razlike dveh posameznih rezultatov preskusa, dobljenih pod pogoji obnovljivosti (npr. identični material, različni izvajalci, različni laboratoriji, z uporabo različne metode), za katero se pričakuje, da bo dobljena z verjetnostjo 95 %; R = 2.8 × sR
Standard deviation, calculated from results under reproducibility conditions.
Standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti.
Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions sR
Relativni standardni odmik, izračunan iz rezultatov, dobljenih pri pogojih obnovljivosti sR
the observed RSDr divided by the RSDr value estimated from the Horwitz equation (1) using the assumption r = 0.66R.
upoštevani RSDr, deljen z vrednostjo RSDr, dobljeno s Horwitzovo enačbo (1) z uporabo predpostavke r = 0,66R.
the observed RSDR value divided by the RSDR value calculated from the Horwitz equation.
upoštevana vrednost RSDR, deljena z vrednostjo RSDR, izračunana s Horwitzovo enačbo.
U the expanded uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 %.
U razširjena negotovost, izračunana s faktorjem pokritja 2, ki ustreza približno 95-% stopnji zaupanja.
Methods of analysis used for food control purposes must comply with points 1 and 2 of the Annex to Council Directive 85/591/EEC.
Metode analize, uporabljene za uradni nadzor živil, morajo biti v skladu z določbami točk 1 in 2 Priloge k Direktivi Sveta 85/591/EGS.
Specific requirements
Posebne zahteve
Where no specific methods for the determination of benzo(a)pyrene in food are prescribed at Community level, laboratories may select any validated method provided the selected method meets the performance criteria indicated in the Table.
Kadar ni predpisanih, metod za določanje benzo-a-pirena v živilih na ravni Skupnosti, laboratoriji lahko izberejo katero koli metodo, če izbrana metoda izpolnjuje izvedbena merila, navedena v preglednici 2.
The validation should ideally include a certified reference material.
Validacija naj po možnosti vključuje certificirani referenčni material.
TABLE
PREGLEDNICA 2
Performance criteria for methods of analysis for benzo(a)pyrene
Izvedbena merila za metode analize za benzo-a-piren
Value/comment
Vrednost/Pripomba
Food specified in Regulation (EC) No …/2005
Živila iz Uredbe (ES) št. …/2003
Detection limit
Meja zaznavnosti
No more than 0,3 μg/kg
Ne več kot 0,3 μg/kg
Limit of quantification
Meja določljivosti
No more than 0,9 μg/kg
Ne več kot 0,9 μg/kg
Precision
Natančnost
HORRATr or HORRATR values of less than 1.5 in the validation collaborative trial
Vrednosti HORRATr ali HORRATR nižji od 1,5 v medlaboratorijskem primerjalnem preskusu
Recovery
Izkoristek
Free from matrix or spectral interferences, verification of positive detection
Potrditev pozitivne detekcije brez matrice ali spektralnih interferenc
Performance Criteria — Uncertainty Function Approach
Merila doseženih rezultatov - Pristop, ki upošteva (merilno) negotovost
However, an uncertainty approach may also be used to assess the suitability of the method of analysis to be used by the laboratory.
Vendar lahko laboratorij za oceno primernosti metode analize uporabi tudi pristop, ki upošteva (merilno) negotovost.
The maximum standard uncertainty can be calculated using the following formula:
Najvišja standardna negotovost se izračuna po enačbi:
is the maximum standard uncertainty
najvišja standardna negotovost
LOD is the limit of detection of the method
LOD LOD meja zaznavnosti metode
C is the concentration of interest
C C izbrana koncentracija
If an analytical method provides results with uncertainty measurements less than the maximum standard uncertainty the method will be equally suitable to one which meets the performance characteristics given in the Table.
Če metoda analize zagotovi rezultate z merilno negotovostjo, ki je nižja od najvišje standardne negotovosti, je metoda ravno tako primerna kot tista, ki izpolnjuje izvedbena merila iz preglednice.
Recovery calculation and reporting of results
Izračun izkoristka in poročanje o rezultatih
The analytical result is to be reported corrected or uncorrected for recovery.
Rezultat analize se poroča, z ali brez izkoristka.
The manner of reporting and the level of recovery must be reported.
Navesti je treba način poročanja in vrednost izkoristka.
The analytical result corrected for recovery is used for checking compliance (see Annex I, point 5).
Rezultat preskušanja, kjer je izkoristek upoštevan se uporablja za preverjanje skladnosti (glej točko 5 Priloge I).
The analyst should note the ‘European Commission Report on the relationship between analytical results, the measurement of uncertainty, recovery factors and the provisions in EU food legislation’ (2).
Analitik mora biti seznanjen s „Poročilom Evropske komisije o odnosu med rezultati analize, merjenjem negotovosti, faktorji izkoristka in določbami v zakonodaji EU v zvezi z živili“ (2).
The analytical result has to be reported as x +/– U whereby x is the analytical result and U is the measurement uncertainty.
O rezultatu preskušanja je treba poročati kot x +/- U, kjer je x rezultat analize in U merilna negotovost.
Laboratory quality standards
Standardi kakovosti za laboratorije
Laboratories must comply with Directive 93/99/EEC.
Laboratoriji morajo biti v skladu z Direktivo 93/99/EGS.
Other considerations for the analysis
Druga načela v zvezi s preskušanjem
Proficiency testing
Preskus strokovnosti
Participation in appropriate proficiency testing schemes which comply with the ‘International Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of (Chemical) Analytical Laboratories’ (3) developed under the auspices of IUPAC/ISO/AOAC.
Sodelovanje v ustreznih shemah medlaboratorijskih primerjalnih preskušanj, ki so v skladu z „Mednarodnim harmoniziranim protokolom za preskus strokovnosti (kemičnih) analitskih laboratorijev“(3), razvitih pod pokroviteljstvom IUPAC/ISO/AOAC.
Internal quality control
Notranje obvladovanje kakovosti
Laboratories should be able to demonstrate that they have internal quality control procedures in place.
Laboratoriji morajo dokazati, da imajo uvedene postopke obvladovanja kakovosti.
Examples of these are the ‘ISO/AOAC/IUPAC Guidelines on Internal Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry Laboratories’ (4).
Primer so „Smernice ISO/AOAC/IUPAC o notranjem obvladovanju kakovosti v analitskih kemičnih laboratorijih“(4)
Horwitz, ‘Evaluation of Analytical Methods for Regulation of Foods and Drugs’, Anal.
Horwitz, „Ovrednotenje metode analize za Uredbo o živilih in zdravilih“, Anal.
European Commission Report on the relationship between analytical results, the measurement of uncertainty, recovery factors and the provisions in EU food legislation, 2004.
Poročilo Evropske komisije o odnosu med rezultati analize, nezanesljivostjo meritev, faktorji izkoristka in določbami v zakonodaji EU v zvezi z živili, 2004.
ISO/AOAC/IUPAC International Harmonised Protocol for Proficiency Testing of (Chemical) Analytical Laboratories, Edited by M. Thompson and R. Wood, Pure Appl.
ISO/AOAC/IUPAC Mednarodni harmonizirani protokol za preskus strokovnosti (kemičnih) analitskih laboratorijev, Izdala M. Thompson in R. Wood, Pure Appl.
Chem., 1993, 65, 2123-2144 (Also published in J. AOAC International, 1993, 76, 926).
Chem., 1993, 65, 2123 - 2144 (tudi objavljeno v J. AOAC International, 1993, 76, 926).
ISO/AOAC/IUPAC International Harmonised Guidelines for Internal Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry Laboratories, Edited by M. Thompson and R. Wood, Pure Appl.
ISO/AOAC/IUPAC Mednarodne harmonizirane smernice za notranje obvladovanje kakovosti v analitskih kemičnih laboratorijih, izdala M. Thompson in R. Wood, Pure Appl.
, where x- is the average of results over all laboratories and samples.
, kjer je povprečje rezultatov za vse laboratorije in vzorce.
Commission Directive 2005/11/EC
Direktiva Komisije 2005/11/ES
amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical progress, Council Directive 92/23/EEC relating to tyres for motor vehicles and their trailers and to their fitting
o spremembi, zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku, Direktive Sveta 92/23/EGS o pnevmatikah za motorna vozila in priklopnike ter njihovi vgradnji
Having regard to Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers [1], and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS z dne 6. februarja 1970 [1] o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic glede homologacije motornih in priklopnih vozil in zlasti člena 13(2) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 92/23/EEC of 31 March 1992 relating to tyres for motor vehicles and their trailers and to their fitting [2], and in particular Article 10 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/23/EGS z dne 31. marca 1992 o pnevmatikah za motorna vozila in priklopnike ter njihovi vgradnji [2], in zlasti člena 10 Direktive,
Directive 92/23/EEC is one of the separate Directives of the EC type-approval procedure established by Directive 70/156/EEC.
Direktiva 92/23/EGS je ena od ločenih direktiv postopka ES za homologacijo, vzpostavljenega z Direktivo 70/156/EGS.
Directive 92/23/EEC as amended by Directive 2001/43/EC provides the possibility for type-approval authorities to accept tyre manufacturers’ laboratories as approved test laboratories until 31 December 2005.
Direktiva 92/23/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2001/43/ES, predvideva možnost, da homologacijski organi lahko priznajo laboratorije proizvajalca pnevmatik kot pooblaščene preskuševalne laboratorije do 31. decembra 2005.
The experience with this provision has been very positive and therefore the possibility should be continued and that deadline should be removed.
Ta določba je v praksi delovala zelo dobro, zato je treba s to možnostjo nadaljevati in odpraviti rok.
Technical progress in the tyre-producing sector is very fast.
Tehnični napredek na področju proizvodnje pnevmatik je zelo hiter.
Due to strong demand from consumers and the car industry, the production cycles of tyres become faster and the variety of tyre types is constantly increasing.
Zaradi velikega povpraševanja potrošnikov in avtomobilske industrije postaja proizvodni cikel pnevmatik hitrejši in število vrst pnevmatik nenehno narašča.
This situation is expected to become even more critical in the future since very expensive or unique test installations and expertise will be required.
Ta situacija naj bi bila v bodoče še bolj kritična, ker bodo potrebni zelo dragi ali posebni objekti za testiranje in strokovno znanje.
In order to be able to bring the newly developed products on to the market without delay, a sufficient number of test facilities, which can be used in a flexible manner, is indispensable.
Da bi lahko brez zamude na trg dajali nove izdelke, je nujno potrebno dovolj veliko število testnih objektov, ki se jih lahko uporablja fleksibilno.
In line with the development of superior tyres due to technical progress, the related test procedures need to be more and more sophisticated.
Skupaj s tehničnim napredkom pnevmatik visoke kakovosti se morajo s tem povezani testni postopki vse bolj izpopolniti.
There is currently no test capacity outside that of tyre manufacturers that would be able to cope with the high number of tests needed.
Trenutno razen infrastrukture proizvajalcev pnevmatik ni na voljo nobena druga infrastruktura za testiranje, ki bi omogočila izvajanje številnih potrebnih testov.
Directive 92/23/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Direktivo 92/23/EGS ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Adaptation to Technical Progress established by Article 13(1) of Directive 70/156/EEC,
Ukrepi, določeni v tej direktivi, so skladni z mnenjem Odbora za prilagajanje tehničnemu napredku, ki je bil ustanovljen s členom 13(1) Direktive 70/156/EGS –
Point 1.3 of Annex I to Directive 92/23/EEC is replaced by the following:
Točka 1.3 Priloge I Direktive 92/23/EGS se spremeni tako, da se glasi:
The approval authority may accept the laboratories of the tyre manufacturers as approved test laboratories pursuant to Article 14(1) of Directive 70/156/EEC.’
Homologacijski organ lahko prizna laboratorije proizvajalcev pnevmatik kot pooblaščene preskuševalne laboratorije v skladu s členom 14(1) Direktive 70/156/EGS.“
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2005 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2005 zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Takoj obvestijo Komisijo o besedilih teh predpisov in korelacijski tabeli z določbami te direktive.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2006.
Države članice uporabljajo te predpise od 1. januarja 2006.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the texts of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Države članice posredujejo Komisiji besedila glavnih predpisov zakonodaje države, ki jih sprejmejo na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/104/EC (OJ L 337, 13.11.2004, p. 13).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/104/ES (UL L 337, 13.11.2004, str. 13).
Directive as last amended by Directive 2001/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 211, 4.8.2001, p. 25).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/43/ES (UL L 211, 4.8.2001, str. 25).
Commission Directive 2005/12/EC
Direktiva Komisije 2005/12/ES
amending Annexes I and II to Directive 2003/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships
o spremembi prilog I in II k Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2003/25/ES o posebnih zahtevah glede stabilnosti RO-RO potniških ladij
Having regard to Directive 2003/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 April 2003 on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships [1], and in particular Article 10 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/25/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. aprila 2003 o posebnih zahtevah glede stabilnosti RO-RO potniških ladij [1] in zlasti člena 10 Direktive,
Directive 2003/25/EC applies to all ro-ro passenger ships operating to or from a port of a Member State on a regular service, regardless of their flag, when engaged on international voyages.
Direktiva 2003/25/ES velja za vse RO-RO potniške ladje, ki opravljajo linijski prevoz v pristanišče države članice ali iz njega, ne glede na njihovo zastavo, ko opravljajo mednarodna potovanja.
Article 6 of Directive 2003/25/EC provides that ro-ro passenger ships shall comply with specific stability requirements which are set out in detail in Annex I to that Directive and that Member States shall use in the application of these requirements the guidelines set out in Annex II thereto.
Člen 6 Direktive 2003/25/ES določa, da RO-RO potniške ladje izpolnjujejo posebne zahteve glede stabilnosti, navedene v Prilogi I k tej direktivi, in da pri uporabi teh zahtev države članice uporabijo smernice, navedene v Prilogi II.
Article 10 of Directive 2003/25/EC provides that the Annexes to the Directive may be amended in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 11(2), in order to take account of developments at international level and particularly at the International Maritime Organisation (IMO).
Člen 10 Direktive 2003/25/ES določa, da se lahko priloge k direktivi spremenijo po postopku iz člena 11(2), zaradi upoštevanja razvoja dogodkov na mednarodni ravni, zlasti v Mednarodni pomorski organizaciji (IMO).
IMO Resolution MSC 141(76) of 5 December 2002 introduced a revised model test method and associated guidance notes under Resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea) Conference.
Resolucija MSC 141(76) IMO z dne 5. decembra 2002 je uvedla popravljen postopek testiranja modelov in pripadajoča navodila v skladu z Resolucijo 14 Konference SOLAS 1995 (Varstvo človeškega življenja na morju).
Resolution 14 concerns regional agreements on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships.
Resolucija 14 se nanaša na regionalne sporazume o posebnih zahtevah glede stabilnosti RO-RO potniških ladij.
The revised model test method should supersede the previously applied model test method provided for in Directive 2003/25/EC.
Popravljen postopek testiranja modelov nadomešča poprej uporabljen postopek testiranja modelov, določen v Direktivi 2003/25/ES.
Any ship having passed the test according to the previously applied model test method need not to do the test again.
Ladij, ki so opravile test po poprej uporabljenem postopku testiranja modelov, ni treba ponovno testirati.
Directive 2003/25/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktivo 2003/25/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, set up by Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2],
Ukrepi, predvideni s to direktivo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost na morju in preprečevanje onesnaževanja z ladij, ustanovljenega z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2099/2002 [2] –
Directive 2003/25/EC is amended as follows:
Direktiva 2003/25/ES se spremeni kot sledi:
Annex I is amended as follows:
V Prilogi I se spremeni naslednje:
paragraph 2.3 is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 2.3 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
the tightness of transverse or longitudinal bulkheads which are taken into account as effective to confine the assumed accumulated sea water in the compartment concerned in the damaged ro-ro deck shall be commensurate with the drainage system, and shall withstand hydrostatic pressure in accordance with the results of the damage calculation.
vodotesne prečne ali vzdolžne pregrade, ki veljajo za učinkovite pri zadrževanju domnevno zbrane morske vode v zadevnem oddelku na poškodovanem krovu za RO-RO tovor, morajo biti sorazmerne drenažnemu sistemu in morajo zdržati hidrostatični tlak v skladu z rezultati izračuna škode.
Such bulkheads shall be at least 4 m in height unless the height of water is less than 0,5 m. In such cases the height of the bulkhead may be calculated in accordance with the following:
Takšne pregrade morajo biti visoke najmanj 4 m, razen če je višina vode manjša od 0,5 m. V takih primerih se lahko višina pregrade izračuna v skladu z naslednjim:
Bh is the bulkhead height;
Bh višina pregrade;
and hw is the height of water.
in hw višina vode.
In any event, the minimum height of the bulkhead should be not less than 2,2 m. However, in case of a ship with hanging car decks, the minimum height of the bulkhead shall be not less than the height to the underside of the hanging deck when in its lowered position;’
V vsakem primeru mora biti pregrada visoka najmanj 2,2 m. Vendar pa najmanjša višina pregrade pri ladji s premičnimi krovi za vozila ne sme biti manjša od proste višine pod premičnim krovom, ko je ta spuščen;“
the Appendix entitled ‘Model test method’, is replaced by the text shown in Annex I to this Directive;
Dodatek z naslovom „Postopek testiranja modelov“ se nadomesti z besedilom, navedenim v Prilogi I k tej direktivi.
in Annex II, Part II, entitled ‘Model testing’, is replaced by the text shown in Annex II to this Directive.
V Prilogi II se del II z naslovom „Testiranje modelov“ nadomesti z besedilom, navedenim v Prilogi II k tej direktivi.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive within 12 months after its date of entry into force at the latest.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje v dvanajstih mesecih od začetka njene veljavnosti.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions and a correlation table between those provisions and this Directive.
Komisiji nemudoma posredujejo besedila teh predpisov ter primerjalno tabelo med njimi in to direktivo.
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta direktiva začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 123, 17.5.2003, p. 22.
UL L 123, 17.5.2003, str. 22.
OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 1.
UL L 324, 29.11.2002, str. 1.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 415/2004 (OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 415/2004 (UL L 68, 6.3.2004, str. 10).
Model test method
Postopek testiranja modelov
This revised model test method is a revision of the method contained in the Appendix to the Annex to resolution 14 of the 1995 SOLAS Conference.
Popravljen postopek testiranja modelov je revizija postopka, vsebovanega v Dodatku k Prilogi Resolucije 14 Konference SOLAS 1995.
Since the entry into force of the Stockholm Agreement a number of model tests has been carried out in accordance with the test method previously in force.
Od začetka veljavnosti Stockholmskega sporazuma so bila opravljena številna testiranja modelov po prej veljavnem postopku.
During these tests a number of refinements in the procedures have been identified.
Med testiranji so bile identificirane številne izpopolnitve.