natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rule 39 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 39 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 39
„Pravilo 39
Rejection of the application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity as inadmissible
Zavrženje zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti zaradi nedopustnosti
Where the Office finds that the required fee has not been paid, it shall invite the applicant to pay the fee within a period specified by it.
Če Urad ugotovi, da zahtevane pristojbine niso bile plačane, pozove vložnika zahteve, naj plača pristojbino v roku, ki mu ga določi.
If the required fee is not paid within the period specified by the Office, the Office shall inform the applicant that the application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity is deemed not to have been filed.
Če zahtevana pristojbina ni plačana v roku, ki ga določi Urad, ta vložnika obvesti, da se zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti ne šteje za vloženo.
If the fee has been paid after expiry of the period specified, it shall be refunded to the applicant.
Če se zahtevana pristojbina plača po izteku roka, ki ga določi Urad, se povrne vložniku.
Where the translation required under Rule 38(1) is not filed within the prescribed period, the Office shall reject the application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity as inadmissible.
Če prevod, zahtevan na podlagi pravila 38(1), ni vložen v predpisanem roku, Urad zavrže zahtevo za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti kot nedopustno.
If the Office finds that the application does not comply with Rule 37, it shall invite the applicant to remedy the deficiencies found within such period as it may specify.
Če Urad ugotovi, da zahteva ni v skladu s pravilom 37, pozove vložnika zahteve, naj odpravi ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti v roku, ki mu ga določi.
If the deficiencies are not remedied before expiry of the time limit, the Office shall reject the application as inadmissible.
Če pomanjkljivosti niso odpravljene pred iztekom roka, Urad zavrže zahtevo kot nedopustno.
Any decision to reject an application for revocation or declaration of invalidity under paragraph 2 or 3 shall be communicated to the applicant and the proprietor of the Community trade mark.’;
Vse odločitve o zavrženju zahteve za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti po odstavkih 2 ali 3 se sporočijo vložniku zahteve in imetniku znamke Skupnosti.“
Rule 40 is amended as follows:
Pravilo 40 se spremeni:
Every application for revocation or for declaration of invalidity which is deemed to have been filed shall be notified to the proprietor of the Community trade mark.
Vsaka zahteva za razveljavitev ali ugotovitev ničnosti, ki se šteje za vloženo, se naznani imetniku znamke Skupnosti.
When the Office has found the application admissible, it shall invite the proprietor of the Community trade mark to file his observations within such period as it may specify.’
Če Urad ugotovi, da je zahteva dopustna, pozove imetnika znamke Skupnosti, naj poda svoja stališča v roku, ki mu ga določi.“
Save where Rule 69 otherwise provides or allows, all observations filed by the parties shall be sent to the other party concerned.’;
Če pravilo 69 ne določa ali dovoljuje drugače, se vsa stališča, ki so jih vložile stranke, pošljejo drugi zadevni stranki.“
paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:
Odstavek 5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In the case of an application for revocation based on Article 50(1)(a) of the Regulation, the Office shall invite the proprietor of the Community trade mark to furnish proof of genuine use of the mark, within such period as it may specify.
V primeru zahteve za razveljavitev na podlagi člena 50(1)(a) Uredbe, Urad pozove imetnika znamke Skupnosti, naj priskrbi dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke v roku, ki mu ga določi.
If the proof is not provided within the time limit set, the Community trade mark shall be revoked.
Če dokaz ni predložen v določenem roku, se znamka Skupnosti razveljavi.
Rule 22(2), (3) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis.’;
Smiselno se uporabi pravilo 22(2), (3) in (4).“
a new paragraph 6 is added:
Doda se novi odstavek (6):
If the applicant has to furnish proof of use or proof that there are proper reasons for non-use under Article 56(2) or (3) of the Regulation, the Office shall invite the applicant to furnish proof of genuine use of the mark, within such period as it may specify.
Če mora vložnik zahteve priskrbeti dokaz o uporabi ali dokaz, da obstajajo ustrezni razlogi za neuporabo na podlagi člena 56(2) ali (3) Uredbe, Urad pozove vložnika, naj priskrbi dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke v roku, ki mu ga določi.
If the proof is not provided within the time limit set, the application for declaration of invalidity shall be rejected.
Če dokaz ni predložen v določenem roku, se zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti zavrže.
Rules 44 and 45 are replaced by the following:
Pravili 44 in 45 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
‘Rule 44
„Pravilo 44
Application for conversion
Prijava za konverzijo
An application for conversion of a Community trade mark application or a registered Community trade mark into a national trade mark application pursuant to Article 108 of the Regulation shall contain:
Prijava za konverzijo prijave znamke Skupnosti ali registrirane znamke Skupnosti v prijavo nacionalne znamke na podlagi člena 108 Uredbe vsebuje.
the name and the address of the applicant for conversion in accordance with Rule 1(1)(b);
ime in naslov vložnika prijave za konverzijo v skladu s pravilom 1(1)(b);
the filing number of the Community trade mark application or the registration number of the Community trade mark;
številko vložitve prijave znamke Skupnosti ali registracijsko številko znamke Skupnosti;
the indication of the ground for conversion in accordance with Article 108(1)(a) or (b) of the Regulation;
navedbo razlogov za konverzijo v skladu s členom 108(1)(a) ali (b) Uredbe;
the specification of the Member State or the Member States in respect of which conversion is requested;
navedbo države članice ali držav članic, za katere se zahteva konverzija;
where the request does not relate to all of the goods and services for which the application has been filed or for which the trade mark has been registered, the application shall contain an indication of the goods and services for which conversion is requested, and, where conversion is requested in respect of more than one Member State and the list of goods and services is not the same for all Member States, an indication of the respective goods and services for each Member State;
če se zahteva ne nanaša na vse blago in storitve, za katere je bila vložena prijava ali registrirana znamka, navedbo blaga in storitev, za katere se zahteva konverzija, in, če se konverzija zahteva za več kot eno državo članico in seznam blaga in storitev ni enak v vseh državah članicah, navedbo ustreznega blaga in storitev za vsako državo članico;
where conversion is requested pursuant to Article 108(6) of the Regulation, the application shall contain the indication of the date on which the decision of the national court has become final, and a copy of that decision; that copy may be submitted in the language in which the decision was given.
če se zahteva konverzija v skladu s členom 108(6) Uredbe, navedbo datuma, na katerega je odločba nacionalnega sodišča postala pravnomočna, in prepis te odločbe; prepis je lahko predložen v jeziku, v katerem je bila izdana odločba.
The application for conversion shall be filed within the relevant period pursuant to Article 108(4), (5) or (6) of the Regulation.
Zahteva za konverzijo se vloži v roku iz člena 108(4), (5) ali (6) Uredbe.
Where conversion is requested following a failure to renew the registration, the period of three months provided for in Article 108(5) of the Regulation shall begin to run on the day following the last day on which the request for renewal can be presented pursuant to Article 47(3) of the Regulation.
Če se zahteva konverzija, pa registracija ni bila podaljšana, začne teči rok treh mesecev, predviden v členu 108(5) Uredbe, dan po zadnjem dnevu, na katerega je mogoče oddati zahtevo za podaljšanje v skladu s členom 47(3) Uredbe.
Rule 45
Pravilo 45
Examination of application for conversion
Preučitev prijave za konverzijo
Where the application for conversion does not comply with the requirements of Article 108(1) or (2) of the Regulation or has not been filed within the relevant period of three months or does not comply with Rule 44 or other Rules, the Office shall notify the applicant accordingly and specify a period within which he may amend the application or furnish any missing information or indications.
Če prijava za konverzijo ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz člena 108(1) ali (2) Uredbe ali ni bila vložena v ustreznem roku treh mesecev ali ne izpolnjuje pravila 44 ali drugih pravil, Urad o tem obvesti vložnika in mu določi rok, v katerem lahko dopolni prijavo ali predloži kakršne koli manjkajoče informacije ali navedbe.
Where the conversion fee has not been paid within the relevant period of three months, the Office shall inform the applicant that the application for conversion is deemed not to have been filed.
Če pristojbina za konverzijo v ustreznem roku treh mesecev ni plačana, Urad prijavitelja obvesti, da se prijava za konverzijo ne šteje za vloženo.
Where the missing indications have not been furnished within the period specified by the Office, the Office shall reject the application for conversion.
Če manjkajoče navedbe, niso bile predložene v roku, ki ga je določil Urad, ta zavrže prijavo za konverzijo.
Where Article 108(2) of the Regulation applies, the Office shall reject the application for conversion as inadmissible only with respect to those Member States for which conversion is excluded under that provision.
Če se uporabi člen 108(2) Uredbe, Urad zavrže prijavo za konverzijo kot nedopustno le glede tistih držav članic, za katere je konverzija po navedeni določbi izključena.
If the Office or a Community trade mark court has refused the Community trade mark application or has declared the Community trade mark invalid on absolute grounds by reference to the language of a Member State, conversion shall be excluded under Article 108(2) of the Regulation for all the Member States in which that language is one of the official languages.
Če je Urad ali Sodišče za znamko Skupnosti zavrnilo prijavo znamke Skupnosti ali je razglasilo znamko Skupnosti za neveljavno iz absolutnih razlogov s sklicevanjem na jezik države članice, se konverzija izključi na podlagi člena 108(2) Uredbe za vse države članice, v katerih je ta jezik eden izmed uradnih jezikov.
If the Office or a Community trade mark court has refused the Community trade mark application or has declared the Community trade mark invalid on absolute grounds which are found to apply in the whole Community or on account of an earlier Community trade mark or other Community industrial property right, conversion is excluded under Article 108(2) of the Regulation for all Member States.’;
Če je Urad ali Sodišče za znamko Skupnosti zavrnilo prijavo znamke Skupnosti ali je razglasilo znamko Skupnosti za neveljavno iz absolutnih razlogov, za katere se je ugotovilo, da veljajo v celotni Skupnosti, ali na račun prejšnje znamke Skupnosti ali druge pravice industrijske lastnine Skupnosti, se konverzija izključi na podlagi člena 108(2) Uredbe za vse države članice.“
Rule 47 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 47 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 47
„Pravilo 47
Transmission to central industrial property offices of the Member States
Prenos na glavne urade za industrijsko lastnino držav članic
Where the application for conversion complies with the requirements of the Regulation and these Rules, the Office shall transmit the application for conversion and the data referred to in Rule 84(2), to the central industrial property offices of the Member States, including the Benelux Trade Mark Office, for which the application has been found admissible.
Če prijava za konverzijo ustreza zahtevam iz Uredbe in teh pravil, Urad prenese prijavo za konverzijo in podatke iz pravila 84(2) na glavne urade za industrijsko lastnino držav članic, vključno z Uradom Beneluksa za znamke, za katere je bila prijava ugotovljena kot dopustna.
The Office shall inform the applicant of the date of transmission.’;
Urad obvesti prijavitelja o datumu prenosa.“
In Rule 50(1) the following is added:
V pravilu 50(1) se doda naslednje:
‘In particular, when the appeal is directed against a decision taken in opposition proceedings, Article 78a of the Regulation shall not be applicable to the time limits fixed pursuant to Article 61(2) of the Regulation.
„Zlasti, če je pritožba naperjena proti odločitvi, sprejeti v postopku ugovora, se člen 78a Uredbe ne uporablja za časovne roke, določene na podlagi člena 61(2) Uredbe.
Where the appeal is directed against a decision of an Opposition Division, the Board shall limit its examination of the appeal to facts and evidence presented within the time limits set in or specified by the Opposition Division in accordance with the Regulation and these Rules, unless the Board considers that additional or supplementary facts and evidence should be taken into account pursuant to Article 74(2) of the Regulation.’;
Če je pritožba naperjena proti odločitvi oddelka za ugovore, odbor omeji preizkus pritožbe na dejstva in dokaze, predložene v rokih, ki jih določi ali navede oddelek za ugovore skladno z uredbo in temi pravili, razen če odbor meni, da je treba dodatna in dopolnilna dejstva in dokaze upoštevati v skladu s členom 74(2) Uredbe.“
Rule 51 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 51 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 51
„Pravilo 51
Reimbursement of appeal fees
Povračilo pristojbin za pritožbe
The appeal fee shall only be reimbursed by order of either of the following:
Pristojbina za pritožbo se povrne le po odredbi katerega izmed naslednjih:
the department whose decision has been impugned, where it grants revision pursuant to Article 60(1) or Article 60a of the Regulation;
oddelka, katerega odločba je izpodbijana, če dovoli vmesni preizkus na podlagi člena 60(1) ali člena 60a Uredbe;
the Board of Appeal, where it allows the appeal and considers such reimbursement equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation.’;
odbora za pritožbe, če pritožbo dovoli in meni, da je takšno povračilo pravično zaradi bistvenih kršitev postopka.“
Rule 53 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 53 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 53
„Pravilo 53
Correction of errors in decisions
Popravki napak v odločbah
Where the Office becomes aware, of its own motion or at the instance of a party to the proceedings, of a linguistic error, error of transcription or obvious mistake in a decision, it shall ensure that error or mistake is corrected by the department or division responsible.’
Če Urad ugotovi po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo stranke v postopku jezikovne napake, napake pri prepisu in očitne napake v odločitvi, zagotovi, da napako popravi odgovorni oddelek.“
The following Rule 53a is inserted:
Vstavi se naslednje pravilo 53a:
‘Rule 53a
„Pravilo 53a
Revocation of a decision or entry in the Register
Razveljavitev odločbe ali vpisa v register
Where the Office finds of its own motion or pursuant to corresponding information by the parties to the proceedings that a decision or entry in the Register is subject to revocation pursuant to Article 77a of the Regulation, it shall inform the party affected about the intended revocation.
Če Urad ugotovi po uradni dolžnosti ali na podlagi ustrezne informacije strank v postopku, da je odločba ali vpis v register predmet razveljavitve na podlagi člena 77a Uredbe, obvesti o nameravani razveljavitvi prizadeto stranko.
The affected party may submit observations on the intended revocation within a period specified by the Office.
Prizadeta stranka lahko predloži stališča o nameravani razveljavitvi v roku, ki ga določi Urad.
Where the affected party agrees to the intended revocation or where he does not submit any observations within the period, the Office shall revoke the decision or entry.
Če se prizadeta stranka strinja z nameravano razveljavitvijo ali če ne predloži stališč v roku, Urad razveljavi odločbo ali vpis.
If the affected party does not agree to the revocation, the Office shall take a decision on the revocation.
Če se prizadeta stranka ne strinja z razveljavitvijo, Urad odloči o razveljavitvi.
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall apply mutatis mutandis if the revocation is likely to affect more than one party.
Odstavki 1, 2 in 3 se smiselno uporabljajo, če je verjetno, da bo razveljavitev vplivala na več kot eno stranko.
In these cases the observations submitted by one of the parties pursuant to paragraph 3 shall always be communicated to the other party or parties with an invitation to submit observations.
V teh primerih se stališča, ki jih predloži ena stranka na podlagi odstavka 3, vedno sporočijo drugi stranki ali strankam s pozivom, naj predložijo stališča.
Where the revocation of a decision or an entry in the Register affects a decision or entry that has been published, the revocation shall also be published.
Če razveljavitev odločbe ali vpisa v register vpliva na odločbo ali vpis, ki je bil objavljen, se objavi tudi razveljavitev.
Competence for revocation under paragraphs 1 to 4 shall lie with the department or unit which took the decision.’;
Za razveljavitev po odstavkih 1 do 4 je pristojen oddelek ali enota, ki je izdala odločbo.“
Rule 59(4) is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 59(4) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The amounts and the advances for expenses to be paid pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall be determined by the President of the Office and shall be published in the Official Journal of the Office.
Znesek in predujem stroškov, ki se plačajo v skladu z odstavki 1, 2 in 3, določi predstojnik Urada, objavijo pa se v uradnem glasilu Urada.
The amounts shall be calculated on the same basis as laid in the Staff Regulations of the Officials of the European Communities and Annex VII thereto.’;
Zneski se izračunajo na isti osnovi, kot je določena v Kadrovskih predpisih za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in njihovi Prilogi VII.“
Rule 60 is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 60 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Rule 60
„Pravilo 60
Minutes of oral proceedings
Zapisnik o ustnem postopku
Minutes of oral proceedings or the taking of evidence shall be drawn up, containing:
O ustnem postopku ali pridobivanju dokazov se sestavi zapisnik, ki vključuje:
the date of the proceedings;
datum postopka;
the names of the competent officials of the Office, the parties, their representatives, and of the witnesses and experts who are present;
imena pristojnih uslužbencev Urada, strank, njihovih zastopnikov ter prisotnih prič in izvedencev;
the applications and requests made by the parties;
prošnje in zahteve strank;
the means of giving or obtaining evidence;
način dajanja in pridobivanja dokazov;
where applicable, the orders or the decision issued by the Office.
kjer je primerno, odredbe ali odločbe, ki jih izda Urad.
The minutes shall become part of the file of the relevant Community trade mark application or registration.
Zapisnik postane del spisa zadevne prijave znamke Skupnosti ali registracije.
The parties shall be provided with a copy of the minutes.
Stranke dobijo izvod zapisnika.
Where witnesses, experts or parties are heard in accordance with Article 76(1)(a) or (d) of the Regulation or Rule 59(2), their statements shall be recorded.’;
Če se zaslišijo priče, izvedenci ali stranke skladno s členom 76(1)(a) ali (d) Uredbe ali pravilom 59(2), se njihove izjave posnamejo.“
Rule 61 is amended as follows:
Pravilo 61 se spremeni:
In proceedings before the Office, notifications to be made by the Office shall take the form of transmitting the original document, an uncertified copy thereof or a computer print-out in accordance with Rule 55, or, as concerns documents emanating from the parties themselves, duplicates or uncertified copies.’;
V postopkih pred Uradom imajo vsa obvestila Urada obliko oddaje originalnega dokumenta, njegovega neoverjenega prepisa ali računalniškega izpisa skladno s pravilom 55, ali kar zadeva dokumente, ki izhajajo od samih strank, dvojnikov ali neoverjenih prepisov.“
Where the addressee has indicated his telecopier number or contact details for communicating with him through other technical means, the Office shall have the choice between any of these means of notification and notification by post.’;
Če je naslovnik navedel številko telefaksa ali podatke za navezavo stikov za medsebojno obveščanje s pomočjo drugih tehničnih sredstev, Urad izbere med temi sredstvi obveščanja in obveščanjem po pošti.“
Rule 62 is amended as follows:
Pravilo 62 se spremeni:
Decisions subject to a time limit for appeal, summonses and other documents as determined by the President of the Office shall be notified by registered letter with advice of delivery.
Odločbe, za katere velja rok za pritožbo, vabila in drugi dokumenti, ki jih določi predstojnik Urada, se posredujejo s priporočeno pošiljko in s povratnico.
All other notifications shall be by ordinary mail.’;
Vsa druga sporočila se posredujejo z navadno pošto.“
the second sentence of paragraph 2 is deleted;
Drugi stavek odstavka 2 se črta.
Notification by ordinary mail shall be deemed to have been effected on the tenth day following that of its posting.’;
Obvestilo z navadno pošto se šteje za opravljeno deseti dan po odpošiljanju.“
In Rule 65(1), the second sentence is replaced by the following:
V pravilu 65(1) se drugi stavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Notification shall be deemed to have been taken place on the date on which the communication was received by the telecopying device of the recipient.’;
„Obvestilo se šteje za opravljeno na datum, ko je bilo sporočilo prejeto po telefaksu prejemnika.“
Rule 66(1) is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 66(1) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
If the address of the addressee cannot be established or if after at least one attempt, notification in accordance with Rule 62 has proved impossible, notification shall be effected by public notice.’;
Če naslovnikovega naslova ni mogoče ugotoviti ali če se je obveščanje v skladu s pravilom 62 izkazalo za nemogoče tudi po najmanj enem poskusu Urada, se obveščanje izvrši z javnim obvestilom.“
Rule 72(2) is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 72(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
If a time limit expires on a day on which there is a general interruption in the delivery of mail in the Member State where the Office is located, or, if and to the extent that the President of the Office has allowed communications to be sent by electronic means pursuant to Rule 82, on which there is an actual interruption of the Offices connection to these electronic means of communication, the time limit shall extend until the first day following that interruption on which the Office is open for the receipt of documents and on which ordinary mail is delivered.
Če rok poteče na dan splošne prekinitve pri dostavljanju pošte v državi članici, v kateri se nahaja Urad, ali, če je in v obsegu, ki ga je dovolil predstojnik Urada, sporočanje dovoljeno preko elektronskih sredstev na podlagi pravila 82, na dan dejanske prekinitve zvez Urada preko teh elektronskih sredstev sporočanja, se rok podaljša do prvega dne po koncu obdobja prekinitve, ko je Urad odprt za sprejem dokumentov, in ko se dostavlja navadna pošta.
The duration of the period of interruption shall be determined by the President of the Office.’;
Trajanje obdobja prekinitve določi predstojnik Urada.“
Rule 72(4) is replaced by the following:
Pravilo 72(4) se nadomesti z naslednjim: