natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air transport passengers of the identity of the operating air carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE [1] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2111/2005 z dne 14. decembra 2005 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti, in informiranju potnikov v zračnem prometu o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki opravlja let, ter razveljavitvi člena 9 Direktive 2004/36/ES [1] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „osnovna uredba“) in zlasti člena 4 Uredbe,
The Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March 2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council [2].
Komisija je sprejela Uredbo (ES) št. 474/2006 z dne 22. marca 2006 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti iz poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [2].
The Commission adopted Regulation (EC) No 910/2006 of 20 June 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March 2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3].
Komisija je sprejela Uredbo (ES) št. 910/2006 z dne 20. junija 2006 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 474/2006 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti iz poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3].
In accordance with Article 4(2) of the basic Regulation and Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 473/2006 of 22 March 2006 laying down implementing rules for the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], a Member State requested to update the Community list.
V skladu s členom 4(2) osnovne uredbe in členom 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 473/2006 z dne 22. marca 2006 o določitvi izvedbenih pravil za seznam Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti iz poglavja II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [4] je država članica zahtevala posodobitev seznama Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 4(3) of the basic Regulation, Member States communicated to the Commission information that is relevant in the context of updating the Community list.
V skladu s členom 4(3) osnovne uredbe so države članice Komisiji sporočile informacije, ki so pomembne za posodobitev seznama Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 7 of the basic Regulation and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, the Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or, when this was not practicable, through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose on them an operating ban within the Community or to modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on an air carrier which is included in the Community list.
V skladu s členom 7 osnovne uredbe in členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006 je Komisija obvestila vse zadevne letalske prevoznike neposredno ali, kadar to ni bilo mogoče, prek organov, odgovornih za njihov regulativni nadzor, pri čemer je navedla bistvena dejstva in razloge, ki so podlaga za odločbo o uvedbi prepovedi opravljanja letov v Skupnosti ali za spremembo pogojev za prepoved opravljanja letalskih prevozov za letalskega prevoznika, ki je vključen na seznam Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 7 of the basic Regulation and Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 473/2006, opportunity was given by the Commission to the air carriers concerned to consult the documents provided by Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission within 10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee [5].
V skladu s členom 7 osnovne uredbe in členom 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 473/2006 je zadevnim letalskim prevoznikom Komisija dala možnost, da imajo vpogled v dokumente, ki so jih zagotovile države članice, da predložijo pisne pripombe in da v desetih delovnih dneh pripravijo ustno predstavitev Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu [5].
Dairo Air Services and DAS Air Cargo
Dairo Air Services in DAS Air Cargo
There is evidence that the operator DAS Air Cargo (DAZ) certified in Kenya is a subsidiary of Dairo Air Services (DSR) certified in Uganda.
Dokazano je, da je prevoznik DAS Air Cargo (DAZ), certificiran v Keniji, hčerinska družba prevoznika Dairo Air Services (DSR), certificiranega v Ugandi.
The two carriers operate the same aircraft.
Oba prevoznika upravljata isti zrakoplov.
Therefore, any measure decided with regard to DSR should equally be applicable to DAZ.
Zato se morajo ukrepi, sprejeti za DSR, uporabljati enakovredno za DAZ.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Dairo Air Services.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Dairo Air Services.
These deficiencies have been identified by the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Germany and Spain, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [6]; the repetition of these inspection findings indicates systemic safety deficiencies.
Te pomanjkljivosti so med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [6], ugotovili Nizozemska, Združeno kraljestvo, Belgija, Francija, Nemčija in Španija. Večkratne ugotovitve preverjanj navajajo sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
Despite cooperation with Member States and individual remedial actions taken by the Ugandan authorities and by Dairo Air Services, the repetition of these findings indicates systemic safety deficiencies.
Kljub sodelovanju z državami članicami in posameznim sanacijskim ukrepom, ki so jih sprejeli ugandski organi in Dairo Air Services, ponovne ugotovitve navajajo sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
The UK Civil Aviation Authority performed an inspection on Dairo Air Services and Das Air Cargo, which revealed that between 21 April and 25 July 2006 aircraft operated by the two air carriers were being maintained by a maintenance organisation without a proper approval, thus constituting a serious safety deficiency.
Uprava Združenega kraljestva za civilno letalstvo je izvedla preverjanji prevoznikov Dairo Air Services in Das Air Cargo, ki sta pokazali, da je med 21. aprilom in 25. julijem 2006 zrakoplov, ki sta ga upravljala oba letalska prevoznika, vzdrževala organizacija za vzdrževanje brez ustrezne odobritve, kar je pomenilo resno varnostno pomanjkljivost.
DSR demonstrated a lack of transparency and adequate and timely communication in response to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of the Netherlands regarding the safety aspect of its operation, as demonstrated by the absence of an adequate and timely reply to the correspondence sent by this Member State.
DSR se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Nizozemske v zvezi z varnostnim vidikom svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ter ustrezne in pravočasne komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno in pravočasno odgovoril na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Dairo Air Services and DAS Air Cargo do not fully meet the relevant safety standards, and therefore should be included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Dairo Air Services in DAS Air Cargo ne izpolnjujeta v celoti ustreznih varnostnih standardov in zato ostaneta v Prilogi A.
Air carriers from the Kyrgyz Republic
Letalski prevozniki iz Kirgiške republike
Following the invitation of the Kyrgyz Republic civil aviation authority, a team of European experts conducted a fact-finding mission to the Kyrgyz Republic from 10 to 15 September 2006.
Na povabilo uprave za civilno letalstvo Kirgiške republike je od 10. do 15. septembra 2006 skupina evropskih strokovnjakov izvedla misijo za ugotavljanje dejstev v Kirgiški republiki.
Its report shows that the Kyrgyz civil aviation authority has revealed an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago convention.
Iz poročila je razvidno, da kirgiška uprava za civilno letalstvo ni dovolj sposobna za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov v skladu z njenimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
In addition, a majority of carriers visited by the European experts although holders of an Air Operators Certificate (AOC) issued by Kyrgyz Republic, did not have their principle place of business in Kyrgyz Republic, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Poleg tega večina letalskih prevoznikov, katere so obiskali evropski strokovnjaki in so imetniki spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC), ki jih je izdala Kirgiška republika, nima glavnega sedeža v Kirgiški republiki, kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in Kyrgyz Republic do not meet the relevant safety standards and therefore they should be subject to an operating ban and included in Annex A.
Ker se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da noben letalski prevoznik, certificiran v Kirgiški republiki, ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov, mora zanje veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
The authorities of Kyrgyz Republic have provided the Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air Operator's Certificates of the following two air carriers: Phoenix Aviation and Star Jet.
Organi Kirgiške republike so Komisiji predložili dokaz o odvzemu spričevala dvema letalskima prevoznikoma: Phoenix Aviation in Star Jet.
Since these two carriers certified in Kyrgyz Republic have consequently ceased their activities, they should not be included in Annex A.
Ker sta zato ta dva prevoznika, certificirana v Kirgiški republiki, prekinila svoje dejavnosti, se ne vključita v Prilogo A.
The authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo have provided the Commission with information indicating that they released an AOC to the following air carriers: Air Beni, Air Infini, Bel Glob Airlines, Bravo Air Congo, Gomair, Katanga Airways, Sun Air Services, Zaabu International.
Organi Demokratične republike Kongo so Komisiji posredovali informacije, ki navajajo dodelitev spričevala naslednjim letalskim prevoznikom: Air Beni, Air Infini, Bel Glob Airlines, Bravo Air Congo, Gomair, Katanga Airways, Sun Air Services, Zaabu International.
Since these new air carriers are certified by the authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo which have shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight, they should be included in Annex A.
Ker so nove prevoznike certificirali organi Demokratične republike Kongo, ki je pokazala pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvajanje primernega varnostnega nadzora, jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
The authorities of the Democratic Republic of Congo have provided the Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air Operator's Certificates of the following air carriers: African Business and Transportations, Air Charter Services, Air Plan International, Air Transport Service, ATO – Air Transport Office, Congo Air, Dahla Airlines, DAS Airlines, Espace Aviation Services, Funtshi Aviation Service, GR Aviation, JETAIR – Jet Aero Services, Kinshasa Airways, Okapi Airways, Scibe Airlift, Shabair, Trans Service Airlift, Waltair Aviation, Zaire Aero Service (ZAS).
Organi Demokratične republike Kongo so Komisiji predložili dokaz o odvzemu spričevala naslednjim letalskim prevoznikom: African Business and Transportations, Air Charter Services, Air Plan International, Air Transport Service, ATO – Air Transport Office, Congo Air, Dahla Airlines, DAS Airlines, Espace Aviation Services, Funtshi Aviation Service, GR Aviation, JETAIR – Jet Aero Services, Kinshasa Airways, Okapi Airways, Safari Logistics, Scibe Airlift, Shabair, Trans Service Airlift, Waltair Aviation, Zaire Aero Service (ZAS).
Since these carriers certified in the Democratic Republic of Congo have consequently ceased their activities, they should be withdrawn from Annex A.
Ker so zato ti prevozniki, certificirani v Demokratični republiki Kongo, prekinili svoje dejavnosti, se izključijo iz Priloge A.
The authorities of Liberia have provided the Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air Operator's Certificates of the following air carriers: Air Cargo Plus, Air Cess (Liberia), Air Liberia, Atlantic Aviation Services, Bridge Airlines, Excel Air Services, International Air Services, Jet Cargo-Liberia, Liberia Airways, Liberian World Airlines, Lonestar Airways, Midair Limited, Occidental Airlines, Occidental Airlines (Liberia), Santa Cruise Imperial Airlines, Satgur Air Transport, Simon Air, Sosoliso Airlines, Trans-African Airways, Transway Air Services, United Africa Airlines (Liberia).
Organi Liberije so Komisiji predložili dokaz o odvzemu spričevala naslednjim letalskim prevoznikom: Air Cargo Plus, Air Cess (Liberija), Air Liberia, Atlantic Aviation Services, Bridge Airlines, Excel Air Services, International Air Services, Jet Cargo-Liberia, Liberia Airways, Liberian World Airlines, Lonestar Airways, Midair Limited, Occidental Airlines, Occidental Airlines (Liberija), Santa Cruise Imperial Airlines, Satgur Air Transport, Simon Air, Sosoliso Airlines, Trans-African Airways, Transway Air Services, United Africa Airlines (Liberija).
Since these carriers certified in Liberia have consequently ceased their activities, they should be withdrawn from Annex A.
Ker so zato ti prevozniki, certificirani v Liberiji, prekinili svoje dejavnosti, se izključijo iz Priloge A.
Air carriers from Sierra Leone
Letalski prevozniki iz Sierre Leone
The authorities of Sierra Leone have provided the Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air Operator's Certificates of the following air carriers: Aerolift, Afrik Air Links, Air Leone, Air Salone, Air Sultan Limited, Air Universal, Central Airways Limited, First Line Air, Inter Tropic Airlines, Mountain Air Company, Orange Air Services, Pan African Air Services, Sierra National Airlines, Sky Aviation, Star Air, Transport Africa, Trans Atlantic Airlines, West Coast Airways.
Organi Sierre Leone so Komisiji predložili dokaz o odvzemu spričevala naslednjim letalskim prevoznikom: Aerolift, Afrik Air Links, Air Leone, Air Salone, Air Sultan Limited, Air Universal, Central Airways Limited, First Line Air, Inter Tropic Airlines, Mountain Air Company, Orange Air Services, Pan African Air Services, Sierra National Airlines, Sky Aviation, Star Air, Transport Africa, Trans Atlantic Airlines, West Coast Airways.
Since these carriers certified in Sierra Leone have consequently ceased their activities, they should be withdrawn from Annex A.
Ker so zato ti prevozniki, certificirani v Sierri Leone, prekinili svoje dejavnosti, se izključijo iz Priloge A.
The authorities of Swaziland have provided the Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air Operator's Certificates of the following air carriers: African International Airways, Air Swazi Cargo, East Western Airways, Galaxy Avion, Interflight, Northeast Airlines, Ocean Air, Skygate International, Swazi Air Charter, Volga Atlantic Airlines.
Organi Svazija so Komisiji predložili dokaz o odvzemu spričevala naslednjim letalskim prevoznikom: Air Swazi Cargo, East Western Airways, Galaxy Avion, Interflight, Northeast Airlines, Ocean Air, Skygate International, Swazi Air Charter, Volga Atlantic Airlines.
Since these carriers certified in Swaziland have consequently ceased their activities, they should be withdrawn from Annex A.
Ker so zato ti prevozniki, certificirani v Svaziju, prekinili svoje dejavnosti, se izključijo iz Priloge A.
The authorities of Swaziland and South Africa have provided sufficient evidence that the Air Operator's Certificate issued to African International Airway’s under the aegis of the CAA of Swaziland has been withdrawn, and that the air carrier is now operating under a new Air Operator's Certificate issued by the CAA of South Africa which therefore has the responsibility for its safety oversight.
Organi Svazija in Južne Afrike so predložili zadostne dokaze, da je bilo spričevalo letalskemu prevozniku African International Airway’s, izdano pod nadzorom uprave za civilno varstvo Svazija, odvzeto in da letalski prevoznik zdaj opravlja dejavnost z novim spričevalom letalskega prevoznika, ki ga je izdala uprava za civilno letalstvo Južne Afrike, ki je sedaj odgovorna tudi za varnostni nadzor.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, and without prejudice to verification of effective compliance with the relevant safety standards through adequate ramp inspections, it is assessed that African International Airways should be withdrawn from Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih pravil in brez poseganja v preverjanje dejanske skladnosti z ustreznimi varnostnimi standardi s preverjanji na ploščadi oceni, da je African International Airways treba izključiti iz Priloge B.
In reply to an inquiry by the civil aviation authority of France, Air Service Comores indicated that an action plan had been established in order to correct the safety deficiencies identified during ramp inspections.
Air Service Comores se ni odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije in je navedel, da je pripravil akcijski načrt z namenom, da popravi varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med preverjanji na ploščadi.
However, there is still no evidence of the implementation of an appropriate action plan for all operations of Air Service Comores.
Vendar za vse dejavnosti Air Service Comores še vedno ni dokazov o izvajanju ustreznega akcijskega načrta.
The authorities of Comoros with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Service Comores have provided the Civil Aviation Authorities of France with sufficient information about the safety of operations with respect to the specific aircraft LET 410 UVP with registration mark D6-CAM.
Organi Komorov, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad letalskim prevoznikom Air Service Comores, so upravi za civilno letalstvo Francije predložili zadostne informacije o varnosti dejavnosti v zvezi z določenim zrakoplovom LET 410 UVP z registrsko oznako D6-CAM.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Service Comores meets the relevant safety standards only for flights operated with the aircraft LET 410 UVP with registration mark D6-CAM.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Air Service Comores izpolnjuje ustrezne varnostne standarde le na letih, ki se opravljajo z zrakoplovom LET 410 UVP z registrsko oznako D6-CAM.
Consequently Air Service Comores should be subject to operational restrictions and should be moved from Annex A to Annex B.
Zato mora za Air Service Comores veljati omejitev opravljanja dejavnosti in ga je treba prenesti iz Priloge A v Prilogo B.
Ariana Afghan Airlines submitted a request to be withdrawn from the Community list, provided some documentation in support of this request and showed strong disposition towards cooperation with the Commission and Member States.
Ariana Afghan Airlines je vložil zahtevo, da se ga izključi iz seznama Skupnosti. V podporo te zahteve je zagotovil dokumentacijo in pokazal močno prizadevnost za sodelovanje s Komisijo in državami članicami.
However, since the full implementation of an adequate corrective action plan by the carrier is not completed, the Commission considers that Ariana Afghan Airlines should be retained in the Community list.
Ker pa prevoznik ni izvedel v celoti ustreznega korekcijskega akcijskega načrta, Komisija meni, da Ariana Afghan Airlines ostane vključena na seznamu Skupnosti.
Ariana Afghan Airlines provided information indicating that it has ceased operations with the aircraft Airbus A-310 registered in France with marks F-GYYY, which has been sold.
Ariana Afghan Airlines je predložil informacije, ki potrjujejo, da je prenehal opravljati dejavnost z zrakoplovom Airbus A-310, registriranim v Franciji z oznako F-GYYY, ker ga je prodal.
Therefore, the specific conditions applicable to the Community ban to Ariana Afghan Airlines have changed.
Zato so se spremenili posebni pogoji za prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti, ki veljajo za Ariana Afghan.
The air carrier should be subject to a ban to all its operations and therefore remain included in Annex A.
Za letalskega prevoznika mora veljati prepoved opravljanja letov za vse dejavnosti, zato ostane v Prilogi A.
Documentation submitted by Air Koryo and the Civil Aviation Authorities of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) indicates that the carrier has embarked upon a corrective action plan with the intention of aligning itself fully with the relevant safety standards in due time.
Dokumentacija, ki sta jo predložila Air Koryo in uprava za civilno letalstvo Demokratične ljudske republike Koreje (DPRK) navaja, da je letalski prevoznik začel s korekcijskim akcijskim načrtom za pravočasno popolno uskladitev z ustreznimi varnostnimi standardi.
Furthermore, the Civil Aviation Authorities of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has stated that at present, Air Koryo is not permitted to operate any flights to European destinations unless the carrier equips itself with new aircraft which meet the relevant international safety standards.
Poleg tega uprava za civilno letalstvo Demokratične ljudske republike Koreje (DPRK) navaja, da Air Koryo trenutno nima dovoljenja za opravljanje letov do evropskih namembnih krajev, razen če se letalski prevoznik ne opremi z novim zrakoplovom, ki bo izpolnjeval ustrezne varnostne standarde.
On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Koryo still does not meet fully the relevant safety standards and therefore should be retained within Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Air Koryo še vedno ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov v celoti in zato ostane v Prilogi A.
Following the invitation of the air carrier, a team of European experts conducted a fact-finding mission to Phuket Air in Bangkok, Thailand between 11 to 15 September 2006.
Na povabilo letalskega prevoznika je med 11. in 15. septembrom 2006 skupina evropskih strokovnjakov izvedla misijo za ugotavljanje dejstev na Phuket Air v Bangkoku na Tajskem.
The report from this mission shows that while significant progress has been made by the carrier following its inclusion in the Community list, substantial safety deficiencies still remain to be rectified.
Poročilo te misije kaže, da je prevoznik po vključitvi na seznam Skupnosti napravil znatne izboljšave, vendar še vedno ostajajo resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ki jih mora odpraviti.
Whilst acknowledging the effort made by the carrier towards achieving the level of progress noted in the report, as well as the strong disposition towards cooperation shown both by the carrier and the Thai Department of Civil Aviation, a decision to withdraw Phuket Air from the EC list is still considered to be premature pending the receipt and review of satisfactory evidence confirming the full implementation of the corrective action plan which the carrier is still in the process of completing.
Ob upoštevanju prizadevanja prevoznika za dosego stopnje napredka, navedene v poročilu, kot tudi močne prizadevnosti za sodelovanje, ki jo kažeta letalski prevoznik in tajski oddelek za civilno letalstvo, je odločitev, da se Phuket Air izključi iz seznama ES, še vedno prenagljena, saj glede na prejetje in pregled sprejemljivega dokaza, ki potrjuje celotno izpolnitev korekcijskega načrta, ki ga prevoznik še dokončuje.