natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The only viable way to make the groupings more homogeneous in terms of physical characteristics and prices would be to subdivide the groupings.
Edina učinkovita rešitev, ki bi ustvarila bolj homogene skupine glede fizikalnih lastnosti in cen, bi bila razčlenitev skupin v podskupine.
However, the consequence would be a multiplication of groupings that would render monitoring unworkable, in particular, by making it difficult for customs authorities to discern the difference between product types and the classification of products by grouping upon importation.
Posledica bi bila seveda večje število skupin, kar bi ohromilo nadzor, saj bi predvsem carinski organi imeli precejšnje težave pri razločevanju vrst izdelkov in razvrščanju izdelkov po skupinah ob uvozu.
Moreover, the number of groupings per company might increase by a factor of 5 to 11 compared to those in the undertakings if more characteristics of the different product types were considered in order to arrive at a more accurate classification.
Poleg tega bi se lahko število skupin na posamezno družbo v primerjavi s tistim iz zavez povečalo za količnik 5 do 11, če bi za oblikovanje natančnejše razvrstitve upoštevali več lastnosti različnih vrst izdelka.
Currently, product types already fall into more than several hundred detailed groupings, thus rendering undertakings unworkable.
Trenutno so vrste izdelka že uvrščene v več sto podrobno razčlenjenih skupin, zaradi česar so zaveze vedno bolj neučinkovite.
This number might increase with further developments of the product characteristics.
To število se lahko poveča z nadaljnjim razvojem lastnosti izdelka.
For certain companies subject to the review, the model types sold under a particular product grouping did not change significantly since the acceptance of the undertakings.
V primeru nekaterih družb v preiskavi se vrste izdelka, prodane v okviru posebne skupine izdelka, niso znatno spremenile od sprejetja zavez.
However, the likely increase in the number of product groupings due to further developments in the product groupings, as mentioned in recital (22), could arise at any future stage and in the case of any exporting producer.
Vendar pa se možnost povečanja števila skupin izdelka zaradi nadaljnjega razvoja v skupinah, omenjena v uvodni izjavi (22), lahko pojavi kadar koli v prihodnosti in v primeru katerega koli proizvajalca izvoznika.
It can therefore be concluded that, in order to enable effective monitoring of the undertakings, the groupings of products should be considerably more homogeneous in terms of physical characteristics and prices.
Zato lahko sklenemo, da bi za učinkovit nadzor zavez morale biti skupine izdelkov občutno bolj homogene glede fizikalnih lastnosti in cen.
These characteristics should be stable throughout the duration of the undertaking.
Te lastnosti morajo biti v času trajanja zaveze nespremenljive.
The investigation has confirmed that this has not been the case as regards PET-film.
Preiskava je potrdila, da v primeru folije iz PET to ni držalo.
On the basis of the above facts and considerations, it is considered that the undertakings are not appropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping, since they present both considerable monitoring and enforcement difficulties and unacceptable risks.
Na podlagi zgornjih dejstev in premislekov prevladuje mnenje, da so zaveze neustrezne za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga, saj so povezane s preobsežnim nadzorom, težavnim izvrševanjem in nesprejemljivim tveganjem.
In these circumstances, the undertakings accepted from the five Indian producers subject to the review of the form of the anti-dumping measures should be withdrawn.
V teh okoliščinah je treba zaveze, ki jih je sprejelo pet indijskih proizvajalcev in so predmet pregleda oblike protidampinških ukrepov, ukiniti.
All parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the decision to withdraw the existing undertakings was made, and were given the opportunity to comment.
Vse vpletene stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta odločitev o ukinitvi obstoječih zavez, in so imele možnost predložiti svoje pripombe.
Further to disclosure, some parties indicated that they considered that there were no monitoring or enforcement difficulties related to the undertakings and therefore there were no risks associated with the form of the measures.
Na podlagi tega obvestila so nekatere stranke navedle, da menijo, da ni bilo nobenih težav pri nadzoru ali izvrševanju zavez in posledično nobenega tveganja v zvezi z obliko ukrepov.
Furthermore many of the exporting producers indicated that they had not violated their undertaking agreements.
Poleg tega je več proizvajalcev izvoznikov navedlo, da niso kršili svojih sporazumov iz zavez.
One of the exporting producers concerned indicated that whereas the Notice of Initiation referred to the significance of the development of new product types, they had not introduced any new product types into the EU between the time of the offer of the existing undertaking and the current IP.
En zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik je navedel, da se obvestilo o začetku nanaša na pomembnost razvoja novih vrst izdelka in da sam ni uvedel nobene nove vrste izdelka v EU v času med ponudbo obstoječe zaveze in sedanjega OP.
As regards the technical aspects, the sheer number of variations of this product, coupled with product development possibilities, makes this product unsuited to undertakings as product developments would require a constant update of the MIPs which is not feasible (see recital 22).
S tehničnega vidika je ta izdelek že zaradi samega števila svojih različic skupaj z možnostmi za njihov razvoj neprimeren za zaveze, saj bi razvoj izdelka zahteval neprestano posodabljanje MUC, kar pa ni izvedljivo (glej uvodno izjavo 22).
In this respect, it should be recalled that Article 8(3) of the basic Regulation indicates that undertakings offered need not be accepted if the authorities consider their acceptance impractical, for example, if the number of actual or potential exporters is too great, or for other reasons.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da člen 8(3) osnovne uredbe določa, da ponujenih zavez ni treba sprejeti, če pristojni organi menijo, da bi bilo sprejetje nepraktično, na primer če bi bilo število dejanskih ali potencialnih izvoznikov preveliko, ali zaradi drugih razlogov.
In regard to the claim by exporters that they have not violated the terms of the undertakings, there is no suggestion that violation took place.
Glede pritožbe izvoznikov, da niso kršili določb zavez, ne obstaja noben sum, da je do takšnih kršitev sploh prišlo.
The decision to withdraw the undertakings is based on evidence assembled during the investigation that changes in the mix of products make the undertaking inappropriate and that monitoring of sales of this product are unsuited to undertaking agreements (see recitals 18 to 20 and 22).
Odločitev o umiku zavez temelji na dokazih, zbranih med preiskavo, ki kažejo, da so zaradi sprememb v mešanici izdelkov zaveze neustrezne in da nadzor prodaje tega izdelka ni v skladu s sporazumi iz zavez (glej uvodne izjave 18 do 20 in 22).
Finally, the investigation showed that films different from the mix of products on which the MIPs were based were now widely sold in the Community under the undertaking agreements and that potentially that number and variety of products could grow.
Nazadnje je preiskava pokazala, da se folije, ki se razlikujejo od mešanice izdelkov, na katerih so temeljile MUC, zdaj na veliko prodajajo v Skupnosti v okviru sporazumov iz zavez in da bi se lahko to število ter izbor izdelkov povečala.
Thus, the market situation on which the undertakings had been established, as regards the products sold, is no longer representative in the current review and therefore the undertakings MIPs have become inappropriate.
Zato razmere na trgu, na podlagi katerih so bile določene zaveze, glede prodanih izdelkov niso več reprezentativne za sedanji pregled, zaradi česar so MUC iz zavez postale neustrezne.
In this context, the fact that one exporting producer had not yet introduced any new product types, does not change the fact that the undertakings for the product concerned have been found to be inappropriate and their monitoring not feasible, as explained in recital 28 above.
V tem smislu dejstvo, da en proizvajalec izvoznik še ni uvedel nobene nove vrste izdelka, ne spremeni ugotovitve, da so zaveze za zadevni izdelek neustrezne in njihov nadzor neizvedljiv, kakor je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 28 zgoraj.
In addition, some exporting producers made reference to Article 15 of the Agreement on the implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, hereinafter referred to as ‘WTO Anti-dumping Agreement’ and the requirement therein for developed countries to assist developing countries, indicating that the exporting producers should be given the opportunity to offer new undertaking agreements.
Poleg tega so se nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki sklicevali na člen 15 Sporazuma o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini (GATT) 1994 (v nadaljevanju „Protidampinški sporazum STO“) in iz njega izhajajočih zahtev, naj razvite države pomagajo državam v razvoju, in navedli, da bi morali proizvajalci izvozniki imeti priložnost, da ponudijo nove sporazume iz zavez.
It was suggested that the withdrawal of the undertakings was being made on speculative, non-material grounds which was devaluing the spirit of Article 15 of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement and that withdrawal of the undertakings was a violation of the principle of proportionality.
Izražen je bil sum, da umik zavez temelji na nedokazanih, neutemeljenih razlogih, kar razvrednoti pomen člena 15 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO, in da je umik zavez kršitev načela sorazmernosti.
Article 15 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement refers to the need to explore constructive remedies before applying anti-dumping duties.
Člen 15 Protidampinškega sporazuma STO se sklicuje na nujnost iskanja konstruktivnih rešitev pred uporabo protidampinških dajatev.
The existing undertakings were accepted in the spirit of seeking a constructive remedy to the injurious dumping.
Obstoječe zaveze so bile sprejete v duhu iskanja konstruktivne rešitve za škodljivi damping.
However, it should be recalled that Article 8.3 of the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement indicates that undertakings offered need not be accepted if the authorities consider their acceptance impractical, for example, if the number of actual of potential exporters is too great, or for other reasons.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da člen 8(3) Protidampinškega sporazuma STO določa, da ponujenih zavez ni treba sprejeti, če pristojni organi menijo, da bi bilo sprejetje nepraktično, na primer če bi bilo število dejanskih ali potencialnih izvoznikov preveliko, ali zaradi drugih razlogov.
Far from withdrawing the undertakings on speculative grounds, the investigation has revealed that the products on which the Indian producers agreed to fix undertaking prices (i.e. the MIPs) are largely different from the products currently being sold into the Community.
Daleč od tega, da bi zaveze umaknili iz nepreverjenih razlogov, je preiskava odkrila, da so izdelki, na podlagi katerih so se indijski proizvajalci dogovorili, da bodo določili cene („MUC“), zelo drugačni od izdelkov, ki se trenutno prodajajo v Skupnost.
The withdrawal of the undertakings is therefore not disproportionate but a considered response to developments in the market place brought about by the exporting producers themselves.
Zato umik zavez ni neustrezen, temveč premišljen odgovor na dogajanje na trgu, za katerega so odgovorni proizvajalci izvozniki sami.
Request for an undertaking as regards countervailing measures
Zahtevek za zavezo glede izravnalnih ukrepov
The conclusions of the review of the form of the anti-dumping measures that undertakings are not appropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping since they present both considerable monitoring and enforcement difficulties and unacceptable risks are equally valid as concerns countervailing measures.
Sklepne ugotovitve preiskave oblike protidampinških ukrepov, da so zaveze neustrezne za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga, ker so povezane s preobsežnim nadzorom, težavnim izvrševanjem in nesprejemljivim tveganjem, veljajo tudi za izravnalne ukrepe.
It was also found that the corporate structure of the Polyplex Group would lead to monitoring and enforcement difficulties vis-à-vis an undertaking.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da bi bila nadzor in izvrševanje zaveze zaradi strukture družbe Polyplex Group težavna.
For this reason the acceptance of the undertaking is considered impractical within the meaning of Article 8(3) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Zaradi tega je sprejetje zaveze neuporabno v smislu člena 8(3) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
In the light of the above, it was concluded that the review investigation on the form of the anti-subsidy measures, limited to the acceptability of the undertaking offered by Polyplex, should be terminated and the undertaking in question not be accepted, since the conditions set out in Article 13(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation regarding the acceptance of an undertaking are not met.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve je bilo sklenjeno, da se preiskava v zvezi s pregledom oblike protisubvencijskih ukrepov, omejena na sprejemljivost zaveze, ki jo je ponudil Polyplex, zaključi in se zadevna zaveza ne sprejme, ker pogoji iz člena 13(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe glede sprejetja zaveze niso izpolnjeni.
The reasons why the undertaking offered could not be accepted were disclosed to the applicant concerned,
Razlogi za nesprejetje ponujene zaveze so bili poslani zadevnemu vložniku –
Article 1(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 as in force on the day of publication of this Regulation shall be deleted.
Člen 1(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor velja na dan objave te uredbe, se črta.
Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 as in force on the day of publication of this Regulation shall be renumbered Article 1(3).
Člen 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor velja na dan objave te uredbe, se preštevilči v člen 1(3).
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 as in force on the day of publication of this Regulation shall be deleted.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor velja na dan objave te uredbe, se črta.
Articles 3 and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 as in force on the day of publication of this Regulation shall be renumbered Articles 2 and 3.
Člena 3 in 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, kakor velja na dan objave te uredbe, se preštevilčita v člena 2 in 3.
The partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 is hereby terminated with the non acceptance of the undertaking.
Delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/1999 se zaključi z nesprejetjem zaveze.
Done at Brussels, 27 February 2006.
V Bruslju, 27. februarja 2006.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1976/2004 (OJ L 342, 18.11.2004, p. 8).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1976/2004 (UL L 342, 18.11.2004, str. 8).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1975/2004 (OJ L 342, 18.11.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1975/2004 (UL L 342, 18.11.2004, str. 1).
OJ C 1, 4.1.2005, p. 5.
UL C 1, 4.1.2005, str. 5.
PET film has specific physical, chemical and technical characteristics, which include thickness, coating properties, surface treatment and mechanical properties among others, which determine various types of PET film through different treatments of base film during or after the production process, including corona treatment, metallisation or chemical coating. It therefore exists in many different forms or types.
Folija iz PET ima posebne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti, kot so med drugim debelina, lastnosti premaza, obdelava površine in mehanske lastnosti, ki glede na različne vrste obdelave osnovne folije med proizvodnim postopkom ali po njem, vključno s koronsko obdelavo, metalizacijo ali kemičnimi premazi, določajo različne vrste folije iz PET. Zato obstaja v različnih oblikah in vrstah.
Council Regulation (EC) No 366/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 366/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2], imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 and originating in India (‘the definitive countervailing measures’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“), ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, s poreklom iz Indije („dokončni izravnalni ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 19,1 % imposed on imports from all other companies.
Ukrepi v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini od 3,8 % do 19,1 % so bili uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, na uvoz iz vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena stopnja preostale dajatve v višini 19,1 %.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [3], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of PET film originating, inter alia, in India (‘the definitive anti-dumping measures’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [3] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije („dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“).
Sampling was applied to the Indian exporting producers, and individual duties ranging from 0 % to 62,6 % were imposed on the companies in the sample, while other cooperating companies not included in the sample received a duty based on the weighted average dumping margin of 57,7 % reduced by their individual export subsidy margin.
Pri indijskih proizvajalcih izvoznikih je bila uporabljena metoda vzorčenja; za vzorčene družbe so bile uvedene individualne dajatve v višini od 0 % do 62,6 %, za druge sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, pa je bila uvedena dajatev na podlagi tehtane povprečne stopnje dampinga v višini 57,7 %, od katere je bila odšteta individualna stopnja izvozne subvencije.
A duty of 53,3 % was imposed on all other companies.
Za vse druge družbe je bila uvedena dajatev v višini 53,3 %.
The original investigation period was 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 (‘the original IP’).
Obdobje prvotne preiskave je trajalo od 1. aprila 1999 do 31. marca 2000 („prvotno OP“).
On 22 August 2001, the Commission, by Decision 2001/645/EC [4], accepted undertakings offered by five Indian producers: Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Flex Industries Limited (Flex), Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), MTZ Polyfilms Limited (MTZ), and Polyplex Corporation Limited (Polyplex).
Komisija je 22. avgusta 2001 z Odločbo 2001/645/ES [4] sprejela zaveze, ki jih je ponudilo pet indijskih proizvajalcev: Ester Industries Limited („Ester“), Flex Industries Limited („Flex“), Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“), MTZ Polyfilms Limited („MTZ“) in Polyplex Corporation Limited („Polyplex“).
The Commission announced on 17 February 2005 the change of name of MTZ by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5].
Komisija je 17. februarja 2005 z obvestilom, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5], objavila spremembo imena družbe MTZ.
The Council, by Regulations (EC) Nos 1975/2004 and 1976/2004, extended the definitive countervailing and anti-dumping measures on imports of PET film originating in India, to imports of the same product consigned from Brazil and Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Svet je z uredbama (ES) št. 1975/2004 in 1976/2004 razširil dokončne izravnalne in protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije na uvoz enakega izdelka, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je njegovo poreklo deklarirano v Braziliji ali Izraelu ali ne.
On 28 June 2002 [6], the Commission initiated a partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 limited to the form of the definitive countervailing measures and, in particular, to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by one Indian exporting producer, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 28. junija 2002 [6] v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe začela delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 2597/1999, omejen na obliko dokončnih izravnalnih ukrepov in zlasti na preučitev sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudil en indijski proizvajalec izvoznik.
This investigation has been terminated by Regulation (EC) No 365/2006 [7].
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo (ES) št. 365/2006 [7].
On 22 November 2003 [8], the Commission initiated a partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 limited to the form of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 22. novembra 2003 [8] začela delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, omejen na obliko dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Regulation (EC) No 365/2006, which amended Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo (ES) št. 365/2006, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001.
On 10 December 2004 [9], the Commission initiated an expiry review of the definitive countervailing measures.
Komisija je 10. decembra 2004 [9] začela pregled zaradi izteka dokončnih izravnalnih ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [10] which maintained the definitive countervailing measures.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo (ES) št. 367/2006 [10], ki je ohranila dokončne izravnalne ukrepe.
On 23 August 2005 [11], the Commission initiated a review of Regulations (EC) Nos 1975/2004 and 1976/2004 with respect to the application of an Israeli producer for an exemption from the extended measures.
Komisija je 23. avgusta 2005 [11] začela pregled uredb (ES) št. 1975/2004 in 1976/2004 v zvezi z vlogo izraelskega proizvajalca za izvzetje iz podaljšanih ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 101/2006 [12].
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 101/2006 [12].
On 5 November 2004, a request for a partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001, limited to the level of dumping was lodged by the following Community producers: Du Pont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH and Nuroll SpA (the applicants).
Dne 5. novembra 2004 so naslednji proizvajalci Skupnosti vložili zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, omejen na stopnjo dampinga: Du Pont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH in Nuroll SpA („vložniki“).
The applicants alleged that in regard to imports of PET film from the five Indian producers from whom undertakings were accepted by Decision 2001/645/EC, the level of the existing measures is no longer sufficient to counteract the injurious dumping.
Vložniki so trdili, da raven obstoječih ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom folije iz PET petih indijskih proizvajalcev, katerih zaveze so bile sprejete z Odločbo 2001/645/ES, za preprečevanje škodljivega dampinga ne zadostuje več.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of a partial interim review, the Commission announced on 4 January 2005, by a Notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [13], the initiation of a partial interim review, in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom je Komisija ugotovila, da obstaja dovolj dokazov, ki upravičujejo začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda, zato je 4. januarja 2005 z obvestilom o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [13], napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.