natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
application of a volume discount rate lower than that normally obtained by AZ Fly from its maintenance suppliers; this rate, reduced from […] to […]%, reflects Alitalia's acceptance of higher prices and the absence of any commitments on volume.
uporabo stopnje popusta za obseg del, manjši od tistega, ki ga AZ Fly običajno dobi od izvajalcev vzdrževanja; ta stopnja, znižana z […] na […] %, se ujema z dejstvom, da je Alitalia sprejela višje cene, in odsotnostjo obveznosti o obsegu del.
As regards the latter point, the expert was able to ascertain by tests that a contract with one supplier (Avio), which offered a maximum discount of 7,5 %, did in fact contain a minimum volume guaranteed by Alitalia.
Izvedenec je lahko v zvezi z zadnjim vprašanjem na podlagi opravljenih preverjanj preveril, da je pogodba z enim dobaviteljem (AVIO), za katerega je družba dobila maksimalni popust v višini 7,5 %, vključevala najmanjši obseg del, ki ga zagotavlja Alitalia.
The annual effect of the discount rate reduction is equivalent to additional EBITDA for AZ Servizi, which would rise from €[…] million in 2005 to €[…] million in 2008.
Letni učinek znižanja popusta se ujema z dodatnim EBITDA za AZ Servizi v višini […] milijonov EUR leta 2005 in […] milijonov EUR leta 2008.
Advance billing for groundhandling services
Ugotovitve glede predvidenega fakturiranja storitev oskrbovanja letal na letališču
The prices shown in the plan were estimated on the basis of the price which Alitalia pays at comparable airports [45], or of offers which the company has received at those airports where AZ Servizi will be operating [46].
Cene v načrtu so bile ocenjene na podlagi cene, ki jo Alitalia plačuje primerljivim letališčem [45], ali ponudb, ki jih je družba prejela na letališčih, kjer bo deloval tudi AZ Servizi [46].
A margin of […]% negotiated with Fintecna was added to these prices.
K tem cenam se je prištela […]-odstotna marža, dosežena na pogajanjih s holdingom Fintecna.
The annual effect of such a margin is equivalent to additional EBITDA for AZ Servizi, which would rise from €[…] million in 2005 to €[…] million in 2008.
Letni učinek te marže se ujema z dodatnim EDITBA za AZ Servizi v višini […] milijonov EUR leta 2005 in […] milijonov EUR leta 2008
Advance billing for information technology and shared services
Ugotovitve glede predvidenega fakturiranja informacijskih storitev in skupnih storitev
In the absence of any other information, Alitalia estimated the prices on the basis of offers from companies interested in acquiring such companies, and reduced in the same measure the discount rate being offered by those companies.
Alitalia je zaradi pomanjkanja drugih informacij cene ocenila na podlagi ponudb družb, ki jih je zanimal nakup teh družb, in jih ravno tako znižala za stopnjo popusta, ki so jo te družbe predlagale.
The expert was able to confirm that this rate corresponded to the maximum being offered for shared services and to the minimum for information technology.
Izvedenec je lahko preveril, da ta stopnja ustreza najvišji ponujeni stopnji za skupne storitve in najnižji za informacijsko tehnologijo.
Since these secondary activities each have similar turnover estimates (€62 million in 2005 in respect of the first and €64 million in respect of the second — excluding internal services — out of a total of €935 million), using the average of the two cases would not lead to very different results.
Ker imata ti dve sekundarni dejavnosti podoben predvideni promet (62 milijonov EUR v letu 2005 za prvo in 64 milijonov EUR za drugo, brez notranjih storitev, pri skupnem prometu 935 milijonov EUR), uporaba povprečja v obeh primerih ne bi dala zelo različnih rezultatov.
Findings regarding compliance with the conditions for rescue aid
Ugotovitve glede upoštevanja pomoči za reševanje
These findings are drawn from the additional checks required by the Commission in connection with alleged failure by Italy to honour the undertakings it gave when rescue aid was authorised on 20 July 2004.
Te ugotovitve se ujemajo z dodatnimi preverjanji, ki jih je Komisija želela opraviti glede trditev o neizpolnjevanju obveznosti, ki jih je Italija sprejela ob odobritvi pomoči za reševanje 20. julija 2004.
These undertakings involve refraining from new investment, ensuring that new routes being opened will be profitable and abstaining from predatory pricing; the use of loans secured by rescue aid was also investigated.
Te obveznosti se nanašajo na odsotnost novih naložb, dobičkonosnost odprtih novih letalskih prog in odsotnost dampinških cen; preučila se je tudi uporaba posojila, zajamčenega s pomočjo za reševanje.
Findings regarding refraining from new investment
Ugotovitve glede odsotnosti novih naložb
The expert examined the structure of the fleet as at 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2004 and examined its trends.
Izvedenec je prejel popis flote dne 31. decembra 2003 in 31. decembra 2004 ter preveril njen razvoj.
It concluded that only one aircraft, an Embraer 170, joined the fleet operating after 1 July 2004, in other words after the Commission had decided to grant rescue aid.
Ugotovil je, da se je samo eno letalo, Embraer 170, pridružilo floti v uporabi po 1. juliju 2004 oziroma potem, ko je Komisija sprejela odločitev o pomoči za reševanje.
Alitalia's Board of Directors had made the decision to acquire this aircraft on 19 June 2002, that is before 31 December 2002.
Upravni odbor Alitalie se je za nakup tega letala odločil 19. junija 2002, torej pred 31. decembrom 2002.
Findings regarding analysis of the profitability of the new routes being opened from summer 2004
Ugotovitve glede analize dobičkonosnosti novih letalskih prog, odprtih od poletja 2004 naprej
The expert concluded on the whole that, on the basis of the work carried out and taking into account the few exceptions found (described below), the situation as a whole did not suggest that Alitalia had failed in its undertaking to operate the new routes with positive operating margins.
Izvedenec je na splošno ugotovil, da na podlagi opravljenega dela in ob upoštevanju omejenih izjem, na katere je naletel in so predstavljene v nadaljevanju, celotni položaj ni takšen, da bi bilo treba razumeti, da niso bile upoštevane sprejete obveznosti o zagotavljanju novih letalskih prog s pozitivnim dobičkom.
Since the profitability criterion used was the ‘gross margin’, the expert checked whether the factors taken into account might give cause for comment.
Ker se za dobičkonosnost uporablja merilo o kosmatem dobičku, je izvedenec preveril, ali bi obravnavani elementi lahko botrovali pripombam.
The gross margin (or ‘flight contribution’) is defined as the (passenger or other) revenue generated by a given route, less commercial costs (commissions, etc.), distribution costs (CRSs and costs related to the sales structure and promotional initiatives charged proportionally against the revenue from that route) and variable operating costs (for fuel, airport charges, in-flight service, flight crew allowances, etc.).
Kosmati dobiček (margino lordo ali flight contribution) je opredeljen kot prihodek (od potnikov ali drugega), ustvarjen na tej letalski progi po odbitju stroškov poslovanja (provizije…), prodajnih stroškov (računalniški sistem rezervacij ter stroški prodajne strukture in promocijskih ukrepov, sorazmerno dodeljeni k prihodkom od te letalske proge) in variabilnih obratovalnih stroškov (gorivo, letališke takse, storitve na krovu, nadomestila za posadko…).
The margin was evaluated from two different aspects: the direct margin generated by the passengers on the flight itself, and the margin generated by the ‘feeder value’ added to it, that is to say the margin created by passengers on that flight who are taking connecting flights with the same airline.
Dobiček je bil ocenjen z dveh vidikov: na eni strani z vidika neposrednega dobička od potnikov na samem letu in na drugi strani z vidika k njemu dodanega feeder value, se pravi dobička od teh potnikov na drugih letih družbe, s katerimi letijo v tranzitu.
The expert points out that, for a constant installed capacity (number of aircraft) arising from investments decided before 31 December 2002, the operating logic is one of decreasing marginal profitability, so that the extra resources freed up by better fleet utilisation (in particular for the period commencing winter 2004, in respect of which the expert refers to the data set out in point 47 of the decision to initiate the procedure) are necessarily earmarked for routes less profitable than those already opened.
Izvedenec opozarja, da se v okviru nespremenjene določene zmogljivosti (število letal), ustvarjene na podlagi naložb, o katerih je bila odločitev sprejeta pred 31. decembrom 2002, pri poslovanju uporablja logiko padajoče mejne dobičkonosnosti. Tako so dodatna sredstva, sproščena zaradi boljše uporabe flote (in za katero izvedenec opozarja na podatke, zlasti od zime 2004, ki so bili predstavljeni že v točki 47 odločitve o začetku postopka), nujno dodeljena za letalske proge z nižjo dobičkonosnostjo od tiste na že odprtih progah.
For routes opened in the summer of 2004, the expert checked profitability at end September 2004, the profitability forecast for end December 2004 and the profitability forecast in the 2005 budget.
Izvedenec je glede letalskih prog, odprtih poleti 2004, preveril dobičkonosnost konec septembra 2004, predvideno dobičkonosnost konec decembra 2004 in dobičkonosnost, načrtovano v proračunu za leto 2005.
For routes opened as from winter 2004, reference was made to the latest forecasts for 2005.
Za letalske proge, odprte od zime 2004 naprej, se je skliceval na zadnje napovedi za leto 2005.
The conclusion is that, of the 25 maximum cases examined, all the actual profitability shown at end September 2004 (12 routes opened in summer 2004) or forecast in the 2005 budget for the 25 routes are already positive or, exceptionally, zero (two cases at end September 2004, one at end December 2004, one forecast for 2005); only three routes opened in summer 2004 show a negative direct gross margin at end December 2004.
Pri največ 25 preučenih primerih je ugotovil, da so za 25 letalskih prog neposredne dobičkonosnosti, predstavljene konec septembra 2004 (12 letalskih prog, odprtih poleti 2004) ali pričakovane v proračunu za leto 2005, že pozitivne ali izjemoma ničelne (2 primera konec septembra 2004, 1 primer konec decembra 2004, 1 primer v napovedi za leto 2005); samo 3 letalske proge, odprte poleti 2004, imajo konec decembra 2004 negativen neposredni kosmati dobiček.
These cases are detailed below.
Ti primeri so podrobno povzeti v nadaljevanju.
The three routes with negative direct economic performance at end December 2004 are to Scandinavia:, Malpensa — Copenhagen (€[…] million at end December 2004 compared to €[…] million at end September 2004), Malpensa — Stockholm (€[…] million at end December 2004 compared to €[…] million at end September 2004) and Fiumicino — Stockholm (€[…] million at end December 2004 compared to €[…] million at end September 2004).
Tri letalske proge z negativnim kosmatim dobičkom konec decembra 2004 so proge proti Skandinaviji, in sicer Malpensa–København ([…] EUR konec decembra 2004 po […] milijonih EUR konec septembra 2004), Malpensa–Stockholm ([…] EUR konec decembra 2004 po […] milijonih EUR konec septembra 2004) in Fiumicino–Stockholm ([…] EUR konec decembra 2004 po […] milijonih EUR konec septembra 2004).
All three are entered with positive margins in the 2005 forecast (€[…], €[…] and €[…] million respectively for the year).
Vse tri proge so v proračunu za leto 2005 ocenjene pozitivno ([…], […] in […] milijonov EUR v letu).
The expert related Alitalia management's comments on this, to the effect that these routes are exposed to heavy competition, including from low-cost airlines, and subject to high variable costs due to the length of the journey.
Izvedenec je predstavil pripombe uprave Alitalie o tem, ki je jasno razložila, da so te letalske proge izpostavljene močni konkurenci, tudi s strani nizkocenovnih družb, in imajo visoke variabilne stroške zaradi dolgega leta.
Finally, as indicated generally, these routes were especially penalised by Alitalia's poor performance in autumn 2004 in terms of RATK (revenue per available ton-kilometre), which fell by 14,2 % in October 2004 compared to the previous months.
Nazadnje, kakor je bilo na splošno nakazano, so te letalske proge v slabšem položaju zaradi upada PRTK (prihodek od razpoložljivih tonskih kilometrov) Alitalie jeseni 2004, ko je bil oktobra 2004 za 14,2 % nižji kot v preteklih mesecih.
The company's precarious financial situation, which led to a degree of loss of customer confidence, was thus found to be particularly significant on these new northern European routes, which required a greater effort to attract customer loyalty.
Težavni finančni položaj družbe, zaradi katerega zagotovo izgublja zaupanje strank, je bil tako še posebej opazen na novih letalskih progah na sever Evrope, kjer si je bolj prizadevala za pridobivanje stalnih potnikov.
However, the expert also points out that the information supplied by Alitalia indicates positive ‘feeder values’ for these three routes, the feeder value being the extra margin contributed in incremental revenue by passengers on these routes to Alitalia connecting flights to other destinations, in line with the company's hub strategy.
Izvedenec je vseeno opozoril, da podatki, ki jih je posredovala Alitalia, kažejo na pozitiven feeder value za te tri letalske proge; ta feeder value je dodatni dobiček, ki so ga ustvarili potniki na teh progah, ki so leteli na naslednjih letih Alitalie v skladu s strategijo prometnih vozlišč, ki jo družba razvija.
For 2004 these feeder values are €[…], €[…] and €[…]million respectively [47]; thus, in general terms, the operation of Alitalia's new Scandinavian network should remain profitable.
Te feeder value za leto 2004 znašajo […], […] in […] milijonov EUR [47]. Na splošno je torej poslovanje novega skandinavskega omrežja Alitalie ostalo donosno.
The route with a zero direct margin forecast at end December 2004 is Fiumicino — Zurich (with €[…]million at end September 2004 and €[…]million forecast in the 2005 budget).
Letalska proga z predvidenim ničnim neposrednim dobičkom konec decembra 2004 je Fiumicino–Zürich (s […] milijoni EUR konec septembra 2004 in s […] milijoni EUR, predvidenimi v proračunu za leto 2005).
It is characterised by powerful competitive pressure from Swiss, which operates four daily connections as opposed to only one operated by Alitalia.
Zanjo je značilen močan pritisk konkurence, ko ima družba Swiss vsak dan štiri lete, Alitalia pa samo enega.
The route does, nevertheless, generate a positive feeder value (+ €[…] million) in 2004.
V vsakem primeru je v letu 2004 ustvarila pozitiven feeder value v višini […] milijonov EUR.
By the same token, the route with a zero direct margin forecast for 2005 (Malpensa — Birmingham) generates a positive feeder value of €[…]million, with a net positive impact on the company's results.
Ravno tako bi Malpensa–Birmingham, letalska proga s predvidenim ničelnim neposrednim dobičkom, ustvarila feeder value v višini […] milijonov EUR, od koder pozitiven neto učinek na poslovne izide družbe.
Findings regarding pricing practices on the new routes being opened from summer 2004
Ugotovitve glede analize cen na novih letalskih progah, odprtih od poletja 2004 naprej
The expert carried out a number of analyses and checks on the new routes opened since the summer of 2004.
Izvedenec je na različne načine analiziral in preveril nove letalske proge, odprte od poletja 2004 naprej.
It described the complex fares situation in the aviation industry, arising from the plethora of promotional offers, usually of one month, tied to various minimum and/or maximum stay rules, journey dates and times being changeable and tickets refundable, and the impact of reservation dates; it noted that the most attractive promotional rates are applied to a limited number of seats on each flight.
Opisal je zapleteni položaj oblikovanja cen v letalskem sektorju, tega kažejo številne promocijske ponudbe, ki ponavadi trajajo en mesec in so povezane z uporabo različnih pravil o minimalnem in/ali maksimalnem času bivanja, možnostmi spremembe ure in dneva ter vračilom vozovnice in tudi vplivom, ki ga imajo dnevi rezervacije. Ugotovil je, da najzanimivejše promocijske tarife veljajo za omejeno število sedežev na vsakem letu.
Finally, the expert concluded, from the small number of exceptions found in terms of price leadership, that on the whole there was no evidence to suggest that Alitalia had reneged on its undertaking not to apply predatory prices on the new routes.
Izvedenec je na splošno ugotovil, da glede na majhno število izjem z vidika cenovno najugodnejšega ponudnika ni naletel na takšno situacijo, zaradi katere bi lahko v splošnem menili, da Alitalia ne izpolnjuje obveze, da na novih letalskih progah ne uporablja dampinških cen.
The examinations relied on two sources: the documents supplied by Alitalia and checked by the expert, and the tests carried out on the expert's initiative on the Galileo computer reservation system (CRS) and on Alitalia's Internet site.
Opravljeni preskusi izhajajo iz dveh virov: na eni strani na dokumentaciji, ki jo je posredovala Alitalia in jo je izvedenec preveril, ter na drugi strani na preskusih, ki jih je izvedenec na lastno pobudo opravil v računalniškem sistemu rezervacij (CRS) Galileo in na spletni strani Alitalie.
Tests carried out on Alitalia's data
Preskus podatkov, ki jih je sporočila Alitalia
It was possible to test each of the routes opened from the summer of 2004 onwards, either at the time of opening of the route or in March 2005; the tests involved return flight prices departing both from Italy and from the foreign city concerned.
Preskuse je bilo mogoče opraviti za vsako od letalskih prog, odprtih od poletja 2004 naprej, in sicer bodisi ob odprtju proge bodisi marca 2005; preskusi so bili opravljeni za cene povratnih vozovnic za lete z odhodom iz Italije in z odhodom iz zadevnega tujega mesta.
The prices indicated by Alitalia and its competitors were corrected to take account of the surcharge cost (SC) intended to cover the extra aviation fuel or insurance cost, which could vary greatly from one company to another, the purpose being to show the final price paid by the customer.
Cene, ki so jih napovedale Alitalia in konkurenčne družbe, so bile popravljene, da bi se upoštevali stroški doplačila (surcharge cost) za pokritje dodatnih stroškov kerozina ali stroškov zavarovanja, ki se lahko močno razlikujejo od ene družbe do druge, ter da bi poudarili končno ceno, ki jo potnik plača.
The prices may be summarised as follows:
Cene je mogoče povzeti tako:
Alitalia data (€)
Podatki Alitalia (EUR)
Delta final (€)
Delta finale (EUR
Prices at opening of summer 2004 routes
Cene ob odprtju prog poletje 2004
Zurich — Fiumicino
Zürich–Fiumicino
Prices at opening of winter 2004-2005 routes
Cene ob odprtju prog zima 2004–2005
Timisoara — Malpensa
Temišvar–Malpensa
Shangai — Malpensa
Šanghaj–Malpensa
Salonicco — Fiumicino
Solun–Fiumicino
Prices in March 2005 of winter 2004-2005 routes
Marčne cene prog zima 2004–2005
Malpensa — Zagabria
Malpensa–Zagreb
Only one of the 12 routes opened in the summer of 2004, entailing 24 tests, only one (Zurich-Fiumicino) showed an Alitalia fare (SC included) at the time of opening of the route €25 lower than that of the competitor, Swiss.
Od 12 letalskih prog, odprtih poleti 2004, se pravi pri 24 preskusih, je bila samo v enem primeru (Zürich–Fiumicino) tarifa Alitalie ob odprtju proge po upoštevanju stroškov doplačil za 25 EUR nižja od tarife konkurenčne družbe Swiss.
In this connection, Alitalia argued that the difference in the price was justified by the difference in the type of product, having a much lower flight frequency than its competitor of one to four.
AZ je zato utemeljil razliko v tipologiji proizvoda s precej nižjim številom frekvenc, 1 proti 4, kot pri konkurenčni družbi.
By March 2005, of the 12 routes opened in summer 2004 (24 tests), none was any longer found to have Alitalia fares (SC included) lower than those of its cheapest rival.
Marca 2005 tarifa Alitalie ni bila nižja od tarife najuspešnejše konkurenčne družbe po upoštevanju stroškov doplačil v nobenem primeru od 12 letalskih prog, odprtih poleti 2004, se pravi pri 24 preskusih.
In the case of Zurich — Fiumicino the final price currently paid by Alitalia customers is higher than Swiss's fares.
V primeru Zürich–Fiumicino je končna cena, ki jo odslej plačuje potnik Alitalie, višja od cene družbe Swiss.
Of the 11 routes opened in winter 2004 (22 tests), there are three routes with Italian destinations (Timisoara and Shanghai — Malpensa, Saloniki — Fiumicino) offering an Alitalia fare (SC included) lower than competitors' prices at the time of opening of the route:
Od 11 letalskih prog, odprtih pozimi 2004, se pravi pri 22 preskusih, je bila v treh primerih (Temišvar–Malpensa, Šanghaj–Malpensa, Solun–Fiumicino) tarifa Alitalie ob odprtju proge po upoštevanju stroškov doplačil nižja od tarife konkurenčne družbe:
for Timisoara — Malpensa the price difference compared with Austrian Airlines (OS) is €128. However, Austrian Airlines' price of €390 seemed high compared with the fare charged by that airline for departures from the same city to Amsterdam, Gothenburg, Geneva, Helsinki or Luxembourg (€249 instead of Alitalia's €250 to Malpensa).
na progi Temišvar–Malpensa znaša razlika med tarifama Alitalie in Austrian Airlines (OS) 128 EUR. Vendar se je ta tarifa OS (390 EUR) zdela višja v primerjavi s tarifo iste družbe, ki je veljala za let iz istega mesta proti Amsterdamu, Göteborgu, Ženevi, Helsinkom ali Luxembourgu (249 EUR, ki ustrezajo tarifi Alitalie v višini 250 EUR za Malpenso).
The expert also put forward Alitalia management's explanation that Carpatair, a Romanian airline not in Galileo, offers Timisoara — Orio al Serio (Milan-Bergamo airport) one-way for €70, so that a return ticket would cost €140, more than €100 below Alitalia's fare;
Poleg tega je izvedenec ponudil tudi pojasnilo uprave Alitalie, da romunska letalska družba Carpatair, ki ni vključena v sistem Galileo, ponuja enosmerno vozovnico na progi Temišvar–Orio al Serio (letališče Milano Bergamo) po ceni 70 EUR oziroma povratno vozovnico po ceni 140 EUR, ki je za več kot 100 EUR nižja od cene pri AZ;
for Shanghai — Malpensa the difference is negligible (€1 for a fare of more than €500);
na progi Šanghaj–Malpensa je razlika zanemarljiva (1 EUR za tarifo več kot 500 EUR);
for Saloniki — Fiumicino it is €21, comparing Alitalia's price (SC included) with that of Olympic Airlines, which offers €85 one-way, or €170 return. This observation applies only to departures from Greece, since the Alitalia flight from Italy is more expensive due to the SC which adds an additional €5 to the Alitalia flight.
na progi Solun–Fiumicino znaša razlika 21 EUR, če primerjamo ceno Alitalie po upoštevanju stroškov doplačil s ceno Olympic Airlines, ki ponuja enosmerno vozovnico za 85 EUR oziroma povratno vozovnico za 170 EUR. Ta pripomba velja samo za lete z odhodom iz Grčije, ker je let pri Alitalii z odhodom iz Italije dražji zaradi upoštevanja stroškov doplačil, ki ustvarjajo neto dodatni strošek v višini 5 EUR za let pri Alitalii.
Two of the 11 routes opened in winter 2004 (22 tests), which fly to Italy (Timisoara and Shanghai — Malpensa), as well as the Malpensa-Zagreb link, show an Alitalia rate (SC included) lower than its competitor's in March 2005.
Od 11 letalskih prog, odprtih pozimi 2004, se pravi pri 22 preskusih, je bila v dveh od prejšnjih primerih letov s ciljem v Italiji (Temišvar–Malpensa in Šanghaj–Malpensa) in na progi Malpensa–Zagreb tarifa Alitalie po upoštevanju stroškov doplačil marca 2005 nižja za tarife konkurenčne družbe.
According to the expert, Alitalia management ascribes the difference to limited-duration promotional fares linked with increased frequency:
Po mnenju izvedenca bi uprava Alitalie lahko te razlike utemeljila s časovno omejenimi promocijskimi tarifami, povezanimi s povečanjem pogostnosti letov: