natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Wafers can only be classified in heading 1905 if they have the character of baker's wares.
Vaflji se lahko uvrstijo pod tarifno številko 1905, če imajo značilnosti pekovskih izdelkov.
Heading 1905 does not contain an upper limit for the filling content of pastries.
Tarifna številka 1905 ne določa zgornje meje za količino polnila slaščic.
However, the wafer does not give the product its essential character as it only serves to shape and separate the filling from the coating.
Vendar vafelj proizvodu ne daje bistvenega značaja, saj je namenjen zgolj obliki in ločitvi polnila od obliva.
Consequently, the product cannot be classified in heading 1905.
Proizvod se zato ne more uvrstiti pod tarifno številko 1905.
Product made up of two hollow hemispherical wafers joined together, filled with a creamy nougat and nut centre containing cocoa, and a hazelnut.
Proizvod, sestavljen iz dveh votlih vafljev v obliki polkrogel, ki sta med seboj spojena, polnjen s celim lešnikom in lešnikovo kremo, ki vsebuje kakav.
It is completely coated on the outside with chocolate and chopped hazelnuts.
Na zunanji strani je popolnoma oblit s čokolado in nasekljanimi lešniki.
The product has the shape of a ball with a diameter of approximately 3 cm.
Proizvod je v obliki krogle s premerom približno 3 cm.
The baked wafer, which is not visible from outside, is approximately 2 mm thick.
Pečen vafelj, ki z zunanje strani ni viden, je debel približno 2 mm.
Classification is determined by General Rule 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, Note 1(a) to Chapter 17, Note 2 to Chapter 18 and the wording of CN codes 1806, 180690 and 18069019.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature, opomba 1(a) k 17. poglavju, opomba 2 k 18. poglavju ter besedilo oznak KN 1806, 180690 in 18069019.
Although the product is manufactured using a baked wafer in the shape of a ball, the product has the character of a filled chocolate of heading 1806 (Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature to subheadings 18069011 and 18069019). The stability of the product does not depend entirely on the wafer.
Čeprav je proizvod izdelan iz pečenega vaflja v obliki krogle in njegova stabilnost ni izključno odvisna od vaflja, ima proizvod značilnosti polnjenih čokoladnih bonbonov iz tarifne številke 1806 (pojasnjevalne opombe h kombinirani nomenklaturi k tarifnima podštevilkama 18069011 in 18069019).
Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1050/2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of potassium chloride originating in Belarus and Russia
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz kalijevega klorida s poreklom iz Belorusije in Rusije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation) and in particular Article 11(2) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 [2] (the original Regulation), imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of potassium chloride (potash or the product concerned) originating, inter alia, in Belarus and Russia (the countries concerned).
Svet je z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92 [2] („prvotna uredba“) uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz kalijevega klorida („pepelika“ ali „zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Belorusije in Rusije („zadevni državi“).
Following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) and an interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (the previous investigation) the Council, by Regulation No 969/2000 [3], decided that the abovementioned measures should be maintained and amended the form of the measures.
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) in vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („prejšnja preiskava“) je Svet z Uredbo št. 969/2000 [3] sklenil, da je treba zgoraj omenjene ukrepe ohraniti in spremeniti obliko ukrepov.
By Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 [4], the Council provided for the exemption from the anti-dumping duties of imports into the new Member States that acceded to the European Union on 1 May 2004 (the EU-10) made under the terms of special undertaking offers (enlargement undertakings), and authorised the Commission to accept those enlargement undertakings.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 992/2004 [4] je Svet predvidel oprostitev plačila protidampinških dajatev na uvoz v nove države članice, ki so k Evropski uniji pristopile 1. maja 2004 („EU-10“), pod pogoji posebnih ponujenih zavez („širitvene zaveze“), in pooblastil Komisijo, da sprejme te širitvene zaveze.
On this basis, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2004 [5], accepted enlargement undertakings from (i) an exporting producer in Belarus jointly with companies situated in Austria, Lithuania and Russia, (ii) an exporting producer in Russia jointly with companies situated in Russia and Austria, and (iii) an exporting producer in Russia jointly with a company situated at the time of acceptance in Cyprus.
Na podlagi tega je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 1002/2004 [5] sprejela širitvene zaveze od (i) proizvajalca izvoznika v Belorusiji, skupaj z družbami iz Avstrije, Litve in Rusije, (ii) proizvajalca izvoznika v Rusiji, skupaj z družbami iz Rusije in Avstrije, ter (iii) proizvajalca izvoznika v Rusiji, skupaj z družbo, ki je imela v času sprejetja sedež na Cipru.
By Regulation (EC) No 858/2005 [6], the Commission accepted new undertakings from the exporting producers mentioned above until 13 April 2006.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 858/2005 [6] je Komisija sprejela nove zaveze od zgoraj navedenih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, veljavnih do 13. aprila 2006.
Following two separate partial interim review investigations pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, requested by the Russian exporting producers JSC Silvinit and JSC Uralkali, the Council, by Regulation (EC) 1891/2005 [7], amended Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 replacing the fixed amounts of duties with individual ad valorem duties for all potash types manufactured by these Russian companies.
Po dveh ločenih preiskavah v zvezi z delnim vmesnim pregledom v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki sta jih zahtevala ruska proizvajalca izvoznika JSC Silvinit in JSC Uralkali, je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1891/2005 [7] spremenil Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92, ki nespremenljive zneske dajatev nadomešča z individualno dajatvijo ad valorem za vse vrste pepelike, ki jih proizvajata ti dve ruski družbi.
By Commission Decision No 2005/802/EC [8], undertakings were accepted from the two applicant companies.
S Sklepom Komisije 2005/802/ES [8] so bile sprejete zaveze dveh ruskih vložnikov.
Following the publication of a notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures in force [9], the measures on imports originating in Ukraine expired on 12 May 2005 since no request for an expiry review was lodged.
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov [9], so ukrepi za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Ukrajine prenehali veljati 12. maja 2005, ker ni bil vložen noben zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa.
Requests for review
Zahtevki za pregled
Request for an expiry review
Zahtevek za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa
Following the publication of the abovementioned notice of impending expiry, the Commission received a request to review these measures with regard to Russia and Belarus pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi zgoraj omenjenega obvestila o bližajočem se izteku je Komisija prejela zahtevek za pregled teh ukrepov v zvezi z Rusijo in Belorusijo v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged on 10 February 2005 by the European Potash Producers Association (the applicant) on behalf of producers, whose collective output constitutes about 99 % of the Community production of potash, i.e. a major proportion of the total Community production.
Evropsko združenje proizvajalcev pepelike („vložnik“) je 10. februarja 2005 vložilo zahtevek v imenu proizvajalcev, katerih skupna proizvodnja predstavlja okoli 99 % proizvodnje pepelike v Skupnosti, tj. večji delež celotne proizvodnje Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahteva je temeljila na predvidevanju, da bi iztek ukrepov verjetno povzročil nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Skupnosti.
Indeed, the applicant alleged that potash from the countries concerned is still being sold at dumped prices in the Community.
Dejansko je vložnik trdil, da se pepelika iz zadevnih držav v Skupnosti še vedno prodaja po dampinških cenah.
The applicant also claimed that imports of the product concerned from Belarus and Russia have increased and the volumes and the prices of the imported product have continued to have a negative impact on the market share held, the quantities sold and the level of prices charged by the Community industry, resulting in substantial adverse effects on the overall performance and financial situation of the Community industry.
Vložnik je tudi trdil, da se je uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije in Rusije povečal, da imajo obseg in cene še vedno negativen vpliv na tržni delež, prodane količine in raven cen, ki jih določa industrija Skupnosti, ter da ima navedeno znaten škodljiv vpliv na splošno delovanje in finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti.
Finally, the applicant alleged the likelihood of further injurious dumping and presented evidence that if measures were allowed to lapse the fragile situation of the Community industry would further deteriorate.
Vložnik je predvideval verjetnost nadaljnjega škodljivega dampinga in predstavil dokaze, da se bo občutljiv položaj industrije Skupnosti še naprej slabšal, če bo iztek ukrepov dovoljen.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry review, the Commission initiated an investigation through the publication of a notice of initiation [10] pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da so na voljo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, je Komisija z objavo obvestila o začetku [10] v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe začela preiskavo.
Request for a partial interim review
Zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled
A partial interim review limited to dumping was requested by the sole exporting producer in Belarus, Republican Unitary Enterprise Production Amalgamation Belaruskali (Belaruskali).
Delni vmesni pregled, omejen na damping, je zahteval edini proizvajalec izvoznik v Belorusiji, Republican Unitary Enterprise Production Amalgamation Belaruskali („Belaruskali“).
Belaruskali provided evidence that, as far it is concerned, the circumstances on the basis of which measures were established have changed and that these changes are of a lasting nature.
Belaruskali je zagotovil dokaze, da so se njegove okoliščine, na podlagi katerih so bili določeni ukrepi, spremenile in da so te spremembe trajne.
Belaruskali demonstrated that a comparison of normal value in an appropriate market economy third country and its export prices to the EU over an extended period would lead to a reduction of dumping significantly below the level of the current measures.
Belaruskali je dokazal, da bi primerjava normalne vrednosti v ustrezni tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom in njegovih izvoznih cen v EU v daljšem časovnem obdobju pomenila znatno zmanjšanje dampinga pod raven zdajšnjega obsega.
Therefore, the continued imposition of the measures at the existing level, which is based on the dumping previously established, would no longer be necessary to offset dumping.
Zato nadaljevanje obstoječih ukrepov za preprečevanje dampinga na prej vzpostavljeni ravni ni več potrebno.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of this partial interim review, the Commission initiated an investigation through the publication of a notice of initiation [11] pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom, da so na voljo zadostni dokazi za začetek tega delnega vmesnega pregleda, je Komisija z objavo obvestila o začetku [11] v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe začela preiskavo.
The investigation
Preiskava
The investigation of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping for the expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation concerning Belarus and Russia covered the period from 1 January to 31 December 2004 (IP or the investigation period).
Preiskava verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve dampinga za pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z Belorusijo in Rusijo je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja do 31. decembra 2004 („OP“ ali „obdobje preiskave“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 up to the end of the IP (the period considered).
Preučitev trendov, pomembnih za presojo verjetnosti nadaljevanja ali ponovitve škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The investigation period for the partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation concerning Belarus is the same as the one of the expiry review.
Obdobje preiskave delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe v zvezi z Belorusijo je enako obdobju pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The Commission officially advised the Community producers, the exporters and producers in the exporting countries and the importers/users as well as their representative associations known to be concerned and the representatives of the exporting countries of the initiation of the two reviews.
Komisija je o začetku pregledov uradno obvestila proizvajalce Skupnosti, izvoznike in proizvajalce v državah izvoznicah, uvoznike/uporabnike ter njihova predstavniška združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike držav izvoznic.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all these parties and to those who made themselves known within the time limit set in the notices of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem tem strankam in tistim, ki so se javile v roku, določenem v obvestilih o začetku.
In addition, the known producers in Canada, which was selected as the potential analogue country, were contacted and received questionnaires.
Poleg tega je vzpostavila tudi stik z znanimi proizvajalci v Kanadi, ki je bila izbrana kot morebitna primerljiva država, in jim poslale vprašalnike.
The Commission also gave the parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Komisija je neposredno vpletenim strankam dala tudi možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
The three Community producers replied to the questionnaire.
Vprašalnik so izpolnili trije proizvajalci Skupnosti.
Fourteen unrelated importers and/or users also supplied full questionnaire replies and made their views known in writing.
V celoti izpolnjen vprašalnik in pisno izraženo svoje stališče je dalo tudi štirinajst nepovezanih uvoznikov in/ali uporabnikov.
Replies to the questionnaires were received from three exporting producers in the countries concerned, as well as from five importers in the Community and one exporting trader in Russia which were related to the exporting producers.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so predložili trije proizvajalci izvozniki v zadevnih državah ter tudi pet uvoznikov v Skupnosti in en izvozni trgovec v Rusiji, ki so bili povezani s proizvajalci izvozniki.
One producer in the analogue country provided a complete questionnaire response and another producer in the analogue country provided detailed information concerning its cost of production of the like product.
En proizvajalec v primerljivi državi je predložil v celoti izpolnjen vprašalnik, drug proizvajalec v primerljivi državi pa je predložil podrobne informacije v zvezi s proizvodnimi stroški podobnega izdelka.
Interested Parties and verification visits
Zainteresirane stranke in preveritveni obiski
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary to determine whether or not there is a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury and whether the continued imposition of the measures is in the Community interest or not.
Komisija je iskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev, ali je verjetno, da se bosta damping in škoda nadaljevala ali ponovila in ali je nadaljevanje veljavnosti ukrepov v interesu Skupnosti ali ne.
The Commission also sought and verified all information deemed necessary to determine the level of dumping for the sole exporting producer in Belarus.
Komisija je iskala in preverila tudi vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev stopnje dampinga pri edinem proizvajalcu izvozniku v Belorusiji.
Investigations were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preiskave so bile opravljene v naslednjih družbah:
Community producers
proizvajalci Skupnosti
Cleveland Potash Limited, Saltburn, United Kingdom,
Cleveland Potash Limited, Saltburn, Združeno kraljestvo,
Iberpotash, S.A., Suria (Barcelona), Spain,
Iberpotash, S.A., Suria (Barcelona), Španija,
K+S Kali GmbH, Kassel, Germany;
K+S Kali GmbH, Kassel, Nemčija;
Exporting producers in Russia
proizvajalca izvoznika v Rusiji
JSC Silvinit (Silvinit), Solikamsk, Perm Region, Russia,
JSC Silvinit („Silvinit“), Solikamsk, regija Perm, Rusija,
JSC Uralkali (Uralkali), Berezniki, Perm Region, Russia;
JSC Uralkali („Uralkali“), Berezniki, regija Perm, Rusija;
Related exporter to JSC Silvinit and Belaruskali
z družbama JSC Silvinit in Belaruskali povezan izvoznik
International Potash Company (IPC), Moscow, Russia;
International Potash Company („IPC“), Moskva, Rusija;
Related importer of JSC Silvinit and Belaruskali
z družbama JSC Silvinit in Belaruskali povezan uvoznik
Belurs GmbH (Belurs), Vienna, Austria;
Belurs GmbH („Belurs“), Dunaj, Avstrija;
Producers in the analogue country
proizvajalca v primerljivi državi
Agrium, Inc. (Agrium), Calgary, Alberta, Canada,
Agrium, Inc. („Agrium“), Calgary, Alberta, Kanada,
PCS Potash Corp, Inc (PCS), Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada;
PCS Potash Corp, Inc („PCS“), Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Kanada;
Unrelated importers in the Community
nepovezani uvoznik v Skupnosti
AUREPIO SP, Warsaw, Poland;
AUREPIO SP, Varšava, Poljska;
Unrelated users in the Community
nepovezani uporabniki v Skupnosti
Zaklady Chemiczne ‘Police’ SA, Police, Poland,
Zaklady Chemiczne „Police“ SA, Police, Poljska,
Fosfan S.A., Szczecin, Poland,
Fosfan S.A., Szczecin, Poljska,
Tessenderlo Chemie NV/SA, Brussels, Belgium,
Tessenderlo Chemie NV/SA, Bruselj, Belgija,
Yara SA, Brussels, Belgium.
Yara SA, Bruselj, Belgija.
The product concerned is the same as in the previous investigation, i.e. potassium chloride (potash).
Zadevni izdelek je enak kot v prejšnji preiskavi, tj. kalijev klorid („pepelika“).
It is generally used as agricultural fertiliser, directly, blended with other fertilisers or after transformation into a complex fertiliser known as NPK (nitrogen, phosphor, potash).
Običajno se neposredno uporablja kot kmetijsko gnojilo, kot mešanica z drugimi gnojili ali, po predelavi, kot kompleksno gnojilo, znano kot DFK (dušik, fosfor in kalij).
The potassium content is variable and is expressed as a percentage of the weight of potassium oxide (K2O) on the dry anhydrous product.
Vsebnost kalija je spremenljiva in je izražena kot odstotek teže kalijevega oksida (K2O) v suhem brezvodnem izdelku.
Potash is generally commercialised in either a standard/powder form (standard potash) or in an ‘‘other than standard’ form that includes but is not limited to a granular form (granular potash).
Pepelika se običajno trži v standardni obliki prahu (standardna pepelika) ali v drugi „nestandardni“ obliki, ki med drugim vključuje obliko zrn (zrnata pepelika).
The product is classified into three basic categories, based on the K2O content, namely:
Izdelek je razvrščen v tri osnovne kategorije glede na vsebnost K2O, in sicer:
potassium content not exceeding 40 % K2O – falling under CN code 31042010,
vsebnost kalija do vključno 40 mas. % K2O – uvrščen pod oznako KN 31042010,
potassium content exceeding 40 % K2O but less than or equal to 62 % – falling under CN code 31042050,
vsebnost kalija, ki presega 40 mas. % K2O, vendar do vključno 62 mas. % – uvrščen pod oznako KN 31042050,
potassium content over 62 % K2O – falling under CN code 31042090
vsebnost kalija, ki presega 62 mas. % K2O – uvrščen pod oznako KN 31042090,
and certain special mixtures or blends with a high content of potash, namely:
in nekatere posebne zmesi in mešanice z visoko vsebnostjo pepelike, in sicer:
potassium content equal to or exceeding 35 % K2O but not exceeding 40 % – falling under CN codes ex31052010, ex31052090, ex31056090, ex31059091 and ex31059099,
vsebnost kalija, ki je enaka ali presega 35 mas. % K2O, vendar ne presega 40 mas. % – uvrščen pod oznake KN ex31052010, ex31052090, ex31056090, ex31059091 in ex31059099,
potassium content exceeding 40 % K2O but not exceeding 62 % – falling under CN codes ex31052010, ex31052090, ex31056090, ex31059091 and ex31059099.
vsebnost kalija, ki presega 40 mas. % K2O, vendar ne presega 62 mas. % – uvrščen pod oznake KN ex31052010, ex31052090, ex31056090, ex31059091 in ex31059099.
The investigation confirmed that the product concerned and the potash produced and sold by the Community producers on the Community market, as well as the potash produced and sold on the domestic market of the countries concerned and that produced and sold by Canadian producers on the Canadian market have the same basic physical and chemical properties and the same uses.
Preiskava je potrdila, da imajo zadevni izdelek in pepelika, ki jo proizvajalci Skupnosti proizvajajo in prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti, ter pepelika, proizvedena in prodana na domačem trgu zadevnih držav, in tista, ki jo proizvajajo in prodajajo kanadski proizvajalci na kanadskem trgu, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti ter enako uporabo.
They are therefore considered to be a like product within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobni izdelek.
One exporter in Russia requested the exclusion of standard potash with a K2O content higher than 62 %, which, it was claimed, is only used in pharmaceutical applications, has different prices and is delivered as packed (as opposed to the bulk deliveries of potash used as a fertiliser).
En izvoznik iz Rusije je zahteval izključitev standardne pepelike z vsebnostjo K2O več kot 62 mas. %, za katero se je trdilo, da se uporablja le v farmacevtske namene, ima različne cene in se dostavlja v paketih (v nasprotju s pepeliko za gnojilo, ki se dostavlja v razsutem stanju).
However, as explained above, the product concerned shares the same basic physical characteristics and basic chemical composition of potash of other grades.
Vendar ima, kot je razloženo zgoraj, zadevni izdelek enake osnovne fizikalne lastnosti in osnovno kemično sestavo pepelike drugih kakovosti.
Regarding the alleged price differences, the investigation has shown that this product is frequently sold at prices comparable to potash with a K2O content of 60-62 %.
V zvezi z domnevnimi razlikami v ceni je preiskava pokazala, da se ta izdelek pogosto prodaja po cenah, primerljivih s cenami pepelike z vsebnostjo K2O med 60 mas. % in 62 mas.%.
Furthermore, neither the fact that it has a slightly higher K2O content nor the way it is packed prevents it from being used as a fertiliser.
Poleg tega dejstvo, da ima malo večji delež K2O, in način pakiranja ne preprečujeta, da se ne bi uporabljala kot gnojilo.
Therefore, this claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba to zahtevo zavrniti.
Dumping of imports during the investigation period
Damping uvoza v obdobju preiskave
Analogue Country
Primerljiva država