natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The kit of bricks and the assembling components are used for constructing a tripod.
Komplet kock in montažnih sestavnih delov se uporablja za sestavo trinožnega stativa.
The CD-ROM contains recorded programmes, data, video and sound files.
CD-ROM ima shranjene programe, podatkovne, video in zvočne datoteke.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, and by the wording of CN codes 8525, 852530 and 85253090.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature in besedilo k oznaki KN 8525, 852530 in 85253090.
Although the set is designed for children, it cannot be classified as a toy under heading 9503 because the essential character of the set is given by the camera of heading 8525.
Bistven značaj daje izdelku kamera pod tarifno številko 8525, zato se garniture, ki je sicer namenjena otrokom, ne uvršča k igračam pod tarifno številko 9503.
A paperboard puzzle book for children consisting of sixteen pages.
Otroška knjiga iz kartona, ki obsega 16 strani, s sestavljenko.
Eight of the pages (left side) contain a short children's story with an illustration relating to that story.
Osem strani (leve strani) vsebuje kratko ilustrirano otroško zgodbo.
Seven of the pages (right side) contain a puzzle consisting of 9 pieces, which reproduces the colour illustration of the corresponding page.
Na sedmih (desnih) straneh so sestavljenke iz 9 delčkov; vsaka posnema barvno ilustracijo pripadajoče strani.
The last page contains only an illustration.
Zadnja stran je opremljena samo z ilustracijo.
Classification is determined by General Rules 1, 3(b) and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, and by the wording of CN codes 9503, 950360 and 95036090.
Uvrstitev opredeljujejo s splošna pravila 1, 3(b) in 6 za razlago kombinirane nomenklature in besedilo k oznaki KN 9503, 950360 in 95036090.
Classification as a printed book under heading 4901 or as a children's picture book under heading 4903 is excluded because the text and the pictures have a subsidiary function to the puzzles.
Ker besedilo in ilustracije zgolj dopolnjujejo sestavljanko, tega izdelka ni mogoče uvrstiti pod tarifno številko 4901 kot tiskano knjigo ali tarifno številko 4903 kot otroško slikanico.
The puzzles give the product its essential character and it is therefore classified as a puzzle under heading 9503.
Bistven značaj daje izdelku sestavljanka, zato se uvršča pod tarifno številko 9503.
The photograph is purely for information.
Fotografija je zgolj informativne narave.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1656/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1656/2005
All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 October 2005 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.
Vsakemu zahtevku za uvozno dovoljenje, vloženemu od 1. do 5. oktobra 2005, za sveže, hlajeno ali zamrznjeno goveje meso visoke kvalitete, iz člena 2(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 936/97, se v celoti ugodi.
Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of November 2005 for 4278,497 t.
Zahtevki za dovoljenja se lahko vložijo v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 936/97 tekom prvih pet dni novembra 2005 za 4278,497 ton.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1657/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1657/2005
In between the meetings of the Management Committee for Live Plants and Floriculture Products, the Commission must adopt such measures,
V obdobju med srečanji Upravljalnega odbora za žive rastline in cvetličarske proizvode mora Komisija sprejeti takšne ukrepe –
The Community producer and import prices for uniflorous (bloom) carnations, multiflorous (spray) carnations, large-flowered roses and small-flowered roses as referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 4088/87 shall be as set out in the Annex hereto for the period from 12 to 25 October 2005.
Proizvodne in uvozne cene Skupnosti za enocvetne (navadne) nageljne, mnogocvetne (spray) nageljne, velecvetne vrtnice in drobnocvetne vrtnice iz člena 1 Uredbe (EGS) št. 4088/87 so določene v Prilogi sedanje uredbe za obdobje od 12. do 25. oktobra 2005.
Period from 12 to 25 October 2005
Obdobje: od 12. do 25. oktobra 2005
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1658/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1658/2005
The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 21,485 EUR/100 kg.
Cena neprečiščenega bombaža na svetovnem trgu, določena v členu 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1051/2001, se določi v višini 21,485 EUR/100 kg.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1659/2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz določenih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Provisional Measures
Začasni ukrepi
On 13 April 2005, the Commission imposed, by Regulation (EC) No 552/2005 [2] (the provisional Regulation), a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports into the Community of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
aprila 2005 je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 552/2005 [2] („začasna uredba“) uvedla začasno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz določenih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) v Skupnost.
It is recalled that the investigation period of dumping and injury (IP) covered the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004.
Treba je opozoriti, da je obdobje preiskave dampinga in škode („OP“) zajemalo obdobje od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004.
The examination of trends relevant for the injury analysis covered the period from 1 January 2001 to the end of the IP (period considered).
Preučitev gibanj, pomembnih za analizo škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Following the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain magnesia bricks from the PRC, some interested parties submitted comments in writing.
Po uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz določenih vrst magnezitne opeke s poreklom iz LRK so nekatere zainteresirane stranke dale pisne pripombe.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were examined, and, where considered appropriate, the provisional findings were modified accordingly.
Po preučitvi ustnih in pisnih pripomb, ki so jih predložile stranke, so bile začasne ugotovitve po potrebi ustrezno spremenjene.
After the imposition of provisional measures, on-spot verification visits were carried out at the premises of
Po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov je bil opravljen preveritveni obisk v prostorih:
Carboref GmbH, Germany (unrelated importer)
Carboref GmbH, Nemčija (nepovezani uvoznik),
Duferco, S.A., Switzerland (unrelated importer)
Duferco, S.A., Švica (nepovezani uvoznik),
Duferco La Louvière, Belgium (user)
Duferco La Louvière, Belgija (uporabnik),
Refratechnik Steel GmbH, Germany (related importer).
Refratechnik Steel GmbH, Nemčija (povezani uvoznik).
The Commission further disclosed all the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and the definitive collection of amounts secured by way of the provisional duty.
Nadalje je Komisija razkrila vsa bistvena dejstva in premisleke, na podlagi katerih je nameravala priporočiti uvedbo dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnega pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasno dajatvijo.
The oral and written comments submitted by the parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account for the definitive findings.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile stranke, so bile preučene in po potrebi upoštevane v dokončnih ugotovitvah.
It is recalled that, in recital 12 to the provisional Regulation, the product concerned was defined as chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, whose magnesia component contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, originating in the PRC (the product concerned), normally declared within CN codes ex68159100, ex68159910.
Treba je opozoriti, da je v uvodni izjavi (12) začasne uredbe zadevni izdelek opredeljen kot kemijsko vezana, nežgana magnezitna opeka, ki vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, ki vsebuje magnezit ali ne, s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“), običajno uvrščen pod oznakama KN ex68159100 in ex68159910.
It was found in the further course of the investigation that CN code ex68159990 could also be legally used for imports of the product concerned.
Med nadaljnjo preiskavo je bilo ugotovljeno, da se za uvoz zadevnega izdelka lahko zakonito uporablja tudi oznaka KN ex68159990.
The investigation has shown that the product concerned was also imported under CN codes ex68151010, ex69021000 and ex69039090 (ex69039020 before 1 January 2004) during the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je zadevni izdelek med OP uvažal tudi pod oznakami KN ex68151010, ex69021000 in ex69039090 (ex69039020 pred 1. januarjem 2004).
However, CN codes falling within chapter 69, ceramic products, should only be used for fired products and not for the product concerned which is unfired.
Vendar je treba oznake KN, ki spadajo v poglavje 69, keramični izdelki, uporabljati zgolj za žgane izdelke in ne za zadevni nežgani izdelek.
In addition, CN code 68151010 includes products which are essentially characterised by carbon, whereas the product concerned is essentially characterised by the magnesium oxide content.
Poleg tega oznaka KN 68151010 vključuje izdelke, katerih bistven značaj je ogljik, medtem ko bistven značaj zadevnemu izdelku daje vsebnost magnezijevega oksida.
Therefore, imports of the product concerned under these codes should be considered unacceptable should they be used.
Zato je treba uvoz zadevnega izdelka, če je izveden z uporabo teh oznak, šteti za nesprejemljivega.
In order to prevent misclassifications in the future, and to ensure that the codes will be correctly used, the customs authorities have been alerted via a special risk information form.
Da bi preprečili napačno uvrščanje v prihodnosti in zagotovili pravilno uporabo oznak, so bili carinski organi obveščeni s posebnim obrazcem RIF o informacijah o tveganosti.
One interested party argued that only the CN codes 68159100 and 68159910 were mentioned in the notice of initiation and that the investigation could, therefore, not be extended to the additional codes.
Ena zainteresirana stranka je trdila, da sta bili v obvestilu o začetku preiskave omenjeni samo oznaki KN 68159100 in 68159910 in da se preiskava zato ne more razširiti na dodatne oznake.
However, CN codes which are mentioned in the notice of initiation are given for information only and are not binding, as it is the product description, in particular the physical and chemical characteristics, which is relevant for the scope of the investigation.
Vendar sta omenjeni oznaki KN podani v obvestilu o začetku preiskave samo informativne narave in nista zavezujoči, v nasprotju z opisom izdelka, zlasti fizičnih in kemičnih lastnosti, ki je pomemben za obseg preiskave.
Consequently, all types of magnesia bricks sharing the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and having basically the same use, should be covered by the investigation, regardless of their customs classification.
Zato je treba v preiskavi zajeti vse vrste magnezitne opeke, ki imajo enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti in enako uporabo, ne glede na njihovo carinsko uvrščanje.
The scope of the investigation has thus not been extended.
Obseg preiskave zato ni bil razširjen.
The investigation has clarified that the product concerned should legally be imported under CN codes ex68159100, ex68159910 and ex68159990.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je treba zadevni izdelek zakonito uvažati pod oznakami KN ex68159100, ex68159910 in ex68159990.
If, however, it was found that the product concerned was mistakenly declared under a different CN code, the investigation also covered that product.
Vendar mora preiskava zajeti tudi zadevni izdelek, ki je bil napačno deklariran pod drugo oznako KN.
In the absence of any other comments regarding the definition of the product concerned and the like product, it is therefore concluded that the product concerned is defined as chemically bonded, unfired magnesia bricks, whose magnesia component contains at least 80 % MgO, whether or not containing magnesite, originating in the PRC, declared within CN codes ex68159100, ex68159910 and ex68159990.
Ker ni bilo drugih pripomb v zvezi z opredelitvijo zadevnega izdelka in podobnega izdelka, se zaključi, da je zadevni izdelek opredeljen kot kemijsko vezana, nežgana magnezitna opeka, ki vsebuje vsaj 80 % MgO, ki vsebuje magnezit ali ne, s poreklom iz LRK, običajno uvrščen pod oznakami KN ex68159100, ex68159910 in ex68159990.
Findings in recitals 13 to 16 to the provisional Regulation are also confirmed.
Potrdijo se ugotovitve uvodnih izjav (13) do (16) začasne uredbe.
The general methodology used to establish whether the imports into the Community of the product concerned were dumped was described in the provisional Regulation.
Splošna metodologija, ki se uporablja za določitev, ali je šlo pri uvozu zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost za damping, je opisana v začasni uredbi.
The general methodology as set out in particular in recitals 35, 45 and 61 to the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Potrdi se splošna metodologija, določena zlasti v uvodnih izjavah (35), (45) in (61) začasne uredbe.
Market Economy Treatment (MET)
Tržnogospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
As mentioned in recital 28 to the provisional Regulation, one exporting producer failed to provide conclusive proof that its assets were valued independently and recorded at market value.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (28) začasne uredbe, en proizvajalec izvoznik ni zagotovil zadostnega dokaza, da so bila njegova stalna sredstva resnično neodvisno ocenjena in izračunana po tržnih vrednostih.
It did not demonstrate that all costs were taken into account at market value.
Ni pokazal, da so bile tržne vrednosti upoštevane za vse stroške.
The exporting producer reiterated the same claims after adoption of the provisional Regulation.
Proizvajalec izvoznik je ponovil trditve po sprejemu začasne uredbe.
Although it failed to respect the extended deadlines, it claimed that it had provided new evidence concerning the assets valuation, justifying a reconsideration of the rejection of MET.
Čeprav ni upošteval podaljšanih rokov, je trdil, da je zagotovil nove dokaze glede ocene sredstev, ki opravičujejo ponovno preučitev zavrnitve TGO.
It should be noted that the said exporting producer did not provide the documents requested within the deadlines, which would be sufficient to reject its claims.
Opozoriti je treba, da omenjeni proizvajalec izvoznik zahtevanih dokumentov ni predložil v roku, kar bi zadostovalo za zavrnitev njegovih trditev.
Nevertheless, an examination of the documents received indicated that no new evidence was provided to support these claims.
Vendar je preučitev prejetih dokumentov pokazala, da za podporo teh trditev ni nobenega novega dokaza.
Thus, even if these documents could be taken into consideration, they would not change the findings of the provisional Regulation.
Zato ti dokumenti, tudi če bi bili upoštevani, ne bi spremenili ugotovitev začasne uredbe.
The decision not to grant MET to this exporting producer is therefore confirmed.
Odločitev, da se temu proizvajalcu izvozniku TGO ne odobri, se zato potrdi.
Similarly, two other exporting producers to whom MET had been refused reiterated their objections raised at the provisional stage.
Podobno sta pripombe, predložene v začasni fazi, ponovno predložila še dva proizvajalca izvoznika, ki jima TGO ni bila odobrena.
However, no new evidence was provided which would justify any change in the decision.
Vendar za spremembi odločitev niso bili posredovani nobeni novi dokazi.
In the absence of other comments, the findings concerning MET set out in recitals 17 to 28 to the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve v zvezi s TGO, navedene v uvodnih izjavah od (17) do (28) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
The companies not granted IT provided no new evidence proving that they should be granted IT.
Družbe, ki jim IO ni bila odobrena, niso zagotovile nobenega novega nasprotnega dokaza.
Therefore, and in the absence of any other comments on IT, the findings as set out in recitals 29 to 34 to the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato, in ker na IO ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se ugotovitve, navedene v uvodnih izjavah od (29) do (34) začasne uredbe, potrdijo.
Determination of normal value of all exporting producers not granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti vseh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim TGO ni bila odobrena
As set out in recital 39 to the provisional Regulation, the Commission sought cooperation from 38 known producers around the world.
Kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi (39) začasne uredbe, je Komisija za sodelovanje zaprosila 38 znanih proizvajalcev po svetu.
However, cooperation was only obtained from two producers in the United States of America.
Vendar sta bila pripravljena sodelovati zgolj dva proizvajalca iz Združenih držav Amerike.
The investigation did not show any reason why the information received and verified was not suitable for this proceeding.
Preiskava ni pokazala razloga, zakaj prejete in preverjene informacije za ta postopek ne bi bile ustrezne.
Some interested parties argued that the USA was not an adequate analogue country for establishing the normal value for the PRC.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da ZDA niso ustrezna primerljiva država za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK.
They claimed that with only three producers on the US domestic market the competition was insufficient.
Trdili so, da je zaradi samo treh proizvajalcev konkurenca na domačem trgu ZDA nezadostna.
In this respect, it is recalled that, as set out in recital 40 of the provisional Regulation, the investigation showed that the USA have a competitive market for the product concerned with at least three producers, around 30 suppliers, more than 15 importers and approximately 300 users.
S tem v zvezi je treba omeniti, da je, kakor je določeno v uvodni izjavi (40) začasne uredbe, preiskava pokazala, da imajo ZDA konkurenčen trg za zadevni izdelek z najmanj tremi proizvajalci, približno 30 dobavitelji, več kot 15 izvozniki in približno 300 uporabniki.
This claim was therefore rejected.
Zato se je ta trditev zavrnila.
Since these claims were not further substantiated and in the absence of any further comments on this issue, the choice of the USA as the analogue country is hereby confirmed.
Ker te trditve niso bile utemeljene in ker na to vprašanje ni bilo nobenih nadaljnjih pripomb, se potrdi izbira ZDA kot primerljive države.
Some exporting producers claimed that clerical errors were made in the definitive dumping calculations.
Nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki so trdili, da je pri izračunu dokončnega dampinga prišlo do stvarnih napak.
Other specific claims concerning the ocean freight costs, the insurance cost, export surcharge and the credit rate used in the calculations were also made by exporters.
Izvozniki so tudi navedli druge posebne trditve v zvezi s stroški pomorskega prevoza, stroški zavarovanja in kreditne obresti, uporabljene v izračunih.
Following an examination of these claims, it was found that some clerical errors occurred in the calculations.
Po preučitvi teh trditev je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v izračunih prišlo do nekaterih stvarnih napak.
These were corrected.
Te so bile popravljene.
Some other claims concerning ocean freight, the insurance costs and the export charge could also be accepted as far as they were justified and substantiated.
V kolikor so bile upravičene in utemeljene, so bile sprejete tudi nekatere druge trditve v zvezi s stroški pomorskega prevoza, stroški zavarovanja in izvozno dajatvijo.
All other claims had however to be rejected.
Vse ostale trditve je bilo treba zavrniti.
For the reasons stated below, some interested parties argued that the normal value from the USA should be adjusted downward.
Iz razlogov, navedenih spodaj, so nekatere zainteresirane stranke trdile, da je treba normalno vrednost iz ZDA popraviti navzdol.
Firstly, it was claimed that the Chinese producers have a different cost structure, especially with regard to certain costs including labour and electricity.
Prvič, trdili so, da imajo kitajski proizvajalci drugačno stroškovno strukturo, še posebej, kar zadeva nekatere stroške, vključno s stroški dela in elektrike.
It must be noted that this claim is irrelevant in the context of the assessment of normal value in the analogue country as any such adjustment on the costs would render the investigation in the analogue country meaningless and it would lead to adjust the normal value to non-market economy levels.
Treba je opozoriti, da je ta trditev v smislu ocene normalne vrednosti v primerljivi državi nepomembna, saj bi bila zaradi vsake take prilagoditve stroškov preiskava v primerljivi državi nesmiselna in bi to privedlo do prilagoditve normalne vrednosti na stopnje netržnega gospodarstva.
Moreover, this claim was not substantiated by any evidence.
Poleg tega trditev ni bila podprta z nobenim dokazom.
Therefore, it had to be rejected.
Zato je treba to trditev zavrniti.
Secondly, it was argued that one of the two cooperating producers in the USA is linked to one of the complainant companies in the Community.
Drugič, trdili so, da je eden od dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcev v ZDA povezan z eno od družb pritožnic v Skupnosti.
It is recalled that normal value in the analogue country was established on the basis of the data provided by two companies in the USA.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila normalna vrednost v primerljivi državi določena na podlagi podatkov, ki sta jih zagotovili dve družbi iz ZDA.
This data was closely analysed and verified on spot.
Ti podatki so bili natančno analizirani in preverjeni na kraju samem.
On this basis, it was concluded that the relationship between one of those companies and a complainant company did not affect the reliability of the data used for the establishment of normal value.
Na tej podlagi je bilo sklenjeno, da odnos med eno od teh družb in družbo pritožnico ni vplival na zanesljivost podatkov, uporabljenih za določitev normalne vrednosti.
No indications were found during the investigation that this relationship had any influence on the normal value in analogue country.
Preiskava ni odkrila nobenih navedb, ki bi potrdile vpliv te povezave na normalno vrednost v primerljivi državi.
Finally, following substantiated claims by a number of exporters, normal value was adjusted downwards due to (i) differences in quality of the raw material used by the producers in the analogue country as compared to that used by producers in the PRC; (ii) the higher costs of transport and other charges; and (iii) importation costs associated with the purchases of these raw materials by the US producers.
Končno, v skladu z utemeljenimi trditvami številnih izvoznikov je bila normalna vrednost popravljena navzdol zaradi (i) razlik v kakovosti surovin, ki jih uporabljajo proizvajalci v primerljivi državi v primerjavi s proizvajalci v LRK; (ii) višjih stroškov prevoza in drugih stroškov; in (iii) stroškov uvoza proizvajalcev v ZDA, povezanih s kupovanjem teh surovin.
It was also found that certain types of treatment of the bricks were done in the USA but not in China.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da so se v ZDA izvajali določeni postopki obdelav opeke, ne pa tudi na Kitajskem.
Furthermore, the investigation showed that an adjustment concerning the level of trade was also warranted.
Nadalje je preiskava pokazala, da je bila prilagoditev v zvezi s stopnjo trgovine utemeljena.
In the absence of any other comments, recitals 42 and 43 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ker drugih pripomb ni bilo, se potrdita uvodni izjavi (42) in (43) začasne uredbe.
Determination of normal value of all exporting producers granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti vseh proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki jim je bila TGO odobrena