natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the basis of the above assessment criteria and remunerations for the various types of capital transferred, the amounts shown in the table at paragraph 142 should be paid as appropriate remuneration for the individual elements and years.
Na podlagi imenovanih osnov za izračun in nadomestil za različne vrste prenesenega kapitala so v tabeli v odstavku 142 navedeni skupni zneski, ki bi jih bilo kot primerno nadomestilo treba plačati za posamezne elemente in leta.
Against these amounts should be set the elements of remuneration agreed at the time of the investment, which, in the Commission's view, consist only of the agreed remuneration in varying amounts (see table at paragraph 142) on the take-up of the special-purpose reserve.
Ob tem je treba določiti zneske, ki so bili v času investicije že fiksno določeni kot elementi nadomestila. Pri tem gre po mnenju Komisije samo za fiksno določeno nadomestilo v višini, ki niha (glej tabelo v odstavku 142), za koriščenje rezerve za posebne namene.
Other elements, such as the increases in value put forward by Germany, or the dividend payout of DEM 238 million in 1993, cannot be offset against the appropriate remuneration.
Drugih delov, kot sta na primer realizirano povečanje vrednosti in izplačilo v višini 238 milijonov DEM v letu 1993, ki ju navaja Nemčija, ni mogoče odšteti.
Germany argued that the increases in value achieved by the sales in 1994 and 1998 and the dividend payout of DEM 238 million should be deducted from the remuneration owed.
Nemčija trdi, da je povečanje vrednosti, ki je bilo realizirano ob obeh prodajah v letih 1994 in 1998, in izplačilo v višini 238 milijonov DEM treba odšteti od nadomestila, ki ga je treba plačati.
However, payments made or increases in value achieved after the investment cannot be taken into account when applying the principle of the market-economy investor, who, on the basis of the information available to him at the time of the investment, either expects an appropriate return or agrees a direct remuneration.
Plačila, ki se jih izvede po naložbi, in realizirano povečanje vrednosti po načelu vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu, ki na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na voljo v času naložbe, lahko pričakuje primeren donos ali se dogovori za neposredno nadomestilo, nista bistvena dejavnika.
Dividends or increases in value which cannot be calculated in advance are not relevant.
Tako izplačila ali povečanje vrednosti, ki jih je mogoče izračunati vnaprej, niso odločilna.
Nor is it relevant whether proceeds derive from an increase in value achieved through a sale.
Tudi vprašanje, ali povečanje vrednosti s prodajo vodi k izkupičku ali ne, ni odločilno.
Lastly, it is not clear why the dividend payout of DEM 238 million should have been made on the basis of the transferred special-purpose reserve; at most, proportional account could be taken of the payment based on the ratio of the special-purpose reserve to the rest of LBB's own funds.
Končno tudi ni razvidno, zakaj bi moralo biti na podlagi vložene namenske rezerve narejeno izplačilo v višini 238 milijonov DEM; v poštev bi prišlo kvečjemu sorazmerno plačilo in sicer v razmerju, v katerem sta namenska rezerva in ostali lastni kapital LBB.
Germany also claimed that one reason for the transfer was the potential synergies to be achieved, rather than an increase in equity capital for LBB.
Nemčija tudi trdi, da so bile med razlogi za prenos morebitne sinergije in ne povečanje lastnega kapitala LBB.
Since these synergies neither reduce the usability of the transferred capital for LBB nor increase LBB's costs from the transfer, they should also not influence the level of remuneration for the equity provided which a market-economy investor can demand from the bank.
Ker se s temi sinergijami ne zmanjša niti uporabnost prenesenega kapitala za LBB niti povečajo stroški, ki so za LBB nastali s prenosom, sinergije tudi ne smejo vplivati na višino nadomestila, ki bi ga vlagatelj v tržnem gospodarstvu od banke zahteval za zagotovljeni lastni kapital.
Even if there were an actual benefit accruing to the Land as a result of synergies, any competitor would have been forced by competition to pay to the Land on top of the appropriate consideration for the equity provided, a ‘remuneration’ in the form of such benefits for the financial instrument.
Tudi v primeru dejanske prednosti za deželo kot posledico sinergij, bi bil vsak tekmec zaradi konkurence prisiljen, deželi za finančni instrument poleg primernega nadomestila za zagotovljeni lastni kapital „plačati“ še „nadomestilo“ v obliki takšnih ugodnosti.
The Commission therefore takes the view that any synergy effects do not constitute remuneration paid by LBB for the transfer of WBK.
Komisija je zato mnenja, da pri morebitnih sinergijskih učinkih ne gre za nadomestilo, ki ga LBB izplača za prenos WBK.
The difference between the agreed remuneration of about 0,25 % per annum and the appropriate remuneration of 6,57 % per annum (for the part of IBB's special-purpose reserve which can be used for competitive business) or 10,19 % per annum (for WBK's nominal capital) and 0,15 % per annum (on the part of the capital which is equivalent to a bank guarantee) accordingly constitutes state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Razlika med dogovorjenim nadomestilom približno 0,25 % letno in primernim nadomestilom 6,57 % letno (za tisti del namenske rezerve IBB, ki se ga lahko uporablja za konkurenčno dejavnost) oz. 10,19 % letno za osnovni kapital WBK in 0,15 % letno (za tisti del sredstev, ki je primerljiv z bančnim jamstvom) torej predstavlja pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The aid element is therefore made up as follows:
Element pomoči je torej sestavljen iz naslednjega:
Values (DEM million at year end)
Vrednosti (mio DEM konec leta)
Total
Vsota
Total €
Vsota €
IBB special-purpose reserve
Rezerva IBB za posebne namene
Amount used for promotion business
Koriščenje za dejavnost pospeševanja
Special-purpose reserve remaining
Ostali del rezerve za posebne namene
Remuneration payable
Nadomestilo, ki ga je treba plačati
WBK's nominal capital
Osnovni kapital WBK
Guarantee fee
Provizija za jamstvo
Remuneration already paid
Že plačano nadomestilo
Remuneration still owed
Nadomestilo, ki ga je še treba plačati
This brought the advantage at issue to an end as at 1 September 2004.
S to izločitvijo se je 1. septembra 2004 končala pomoč, ki bi jo bilo treba preiskati.
DISTORTION OF COMPETITION AND EFFECT ON TRADE BETWEEN MEMBER STATES
IZKRIVLJANJE KONKURENCE IN OVIRANJE TRGOVINE MED DRŽAVAMI ČLANICAMI
As a result of the liberalisation of financial services and the integration of financial markets, banking within the Community has become increasingly sensitive to distortions of competition.
Z liberalizacijo finančnih storitev in združevanjem finančnih trgov je bančništvo v Skupnosti vse bolj občutljivo na izkrivljanje konkurenčnosti.
This development is intensifying in the wake of economic and monetary union, which is dismantling the remaining obstacles to competition in the financial services markets.
Ta razvoj se trenutno še stopnjuje zaradi ekonomske in monetarne unije, ki odpravlja preostale ovire za konkurenčnost na trgu finančnih storitev.
Landesbank Berlin carries on regional and international banking business.
Upravičenka Landesbank Berlin je v bančništvu dejavna tako regionalno kot mednarodno.
It defines itself as an all-purpose commercial bank, central bank for the savings banks and the bank of the Land and its municipalities.
Gre za splošno poslovno banko, osrednjo hranilnico ter banko dežele Berlin in njenih občin.
Despite its name, tradition and legally stipulated tasks, LBB is much more than a mere local or regional bank.
Kljub svojemu imenu, tradiciji in zakonsko urejenim nalogam LBB nikakor ni zgolj lokalna ali regionalna banka.
These facts clearly show that LBB offers its banking services in competition with other European banks outside Germany and, since banks from other European countries are active in Germany, inside Germany.
Na podlagi tega je jasno, da LBB nudi bančne storitve v konkurenci z drugimi evropskimi bankami izven Nemčije in, ker so banke iz drugih evropskih držav dejavne v Nemčiji, v Nemčiji.
It should also be recalled that there is a very close link between the equity of a credit institution and its banking activities.
Prav tako je treba opomniti, da obstaja zelo tesna povezava med lastnim kapitalom kreditne institucije in njenimi bančnimi dejavnostmi.
Only on the basis of sufficient accepted equity capital can a bank operate and expand its commercial operations.
Banka lahko posluje in širi svoje trgovske dejavnosti le z zadostnim priznanim lastnim kapitalom.
As the state measure provided LBB with such equity capital for solvency purposes, it directly influenced the bank's business possibilities.
Državni ukrep je LBB zagotovil takšen kapital za namene solventnosti, zato je neposredno vplival na poslovne možnosti banke.
It is clear, therefore, that aid given to LBB distorts competition and affects trade between Member States.
Torej drži, da pomoči za LBB izkrivljajo konkurenco in ovirajo trgovino med državami članicami.
COMPATIBILITY OF THE MEASURE WITH THE EC TREATY
SKLADNOST UKREPA S POGODBO ES
On the basis of all these considerations, it can be stated that the transfer of WBK's capital is caught by all the criteria laid down in Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty and therefore that it involves state aid within the meaning of that Article.
Na podlagi vseh teh preudarkov lahko ugotovimo, da prenos posebnih namenskih sredstev izpolnjuje vsa merila iz člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES in zato prenos WBK vključuje državne pomoči v smislu navedenega člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
On this basis, an assessment must be made as to whether that aid can be considered compatible with the common market.
Na podlagi tega se mora oceniti, ali se pomoč lahko šteje za skladno s skupnim trgom.
It should be pointed out that Germany did not invoke any exemption clause with regard to possible state aid elements in connection with the transfer of assets.
Vendar je treba pripomniti, da Nemčija v zvezi z morebitnimi elementi pomoči v okviru prenosa sredstev ni uveljavila posebnih določb Pogodbe.
None of the exemption clauses of Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty are applicable.
Posebne določbe iz člena 87(2) Pogodbe ES se ne uporabljajo.
The aid does not have a social character and is not granted to individual consumers.
Pomoč ni socialnega značaja in se ne dodeljuje posameznim potrošnikom.
Nor does it make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences or compensate for the economic disadvantages caused by the division of Germany.
Prav tako ne povrne škode, nastale zaradi naravnih nesreč ali drugih izjemnih okoliščin, in ni nadomestilo gospodarske škode, ki jo je povzročila delitev Nemčije.
Given that the aid has no regional objective — it is designed neither to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment nor to facilitate the development of certain economic areas — neither Article 87(3)(a) nor (c) of the EC Treaty, as regards the latter's regional aspect, is applicable.
Ker pomoč nima regionalnega cilja – ni namenjena niti pospeševanju gospodarskega razvoja območij z izjemno nizko življenjsko ravnijo ali z znatno podzaposlenostjo niti pospeševanju razvoja določenih gospodarskih območij – se člen 87(3)(a) in regionalni vidiki iz člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES ne uporabljajo.
Nor does the aid promote the execution of an important project of common European interest.
Pomoč tudi ne pospešuje izvedbe pomembnega projekta skupnega evropskega interesa.
The aid is not aimed either at promoting culture or heritage conservation.
Prav tako pa cilja pomoči nista pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanje kulturne dediščine.
Since the economic survival of LBB was not at stake when the measure took place, there is no need to consider whether the collapse of a single large credit institution like LBB could lead to a general banking crisis in Germany, which might possibly justify aid to remedy a serious disturbance in the German economy under Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty.
Ker gospodarski obstoj LBB v času ukrepa ni bil ogrožen, ni potrebno preučiti ali bi propad ene same velike kreditne institucije, kot je LBB, lahko v Nemčiji privedel do splošne krize v bančnem sektorju, kar bi morda v skladu s členom 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES upravičilo pomoč za odpravljanje resne motnje v nemškem gospodarstvu.
Under Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, aid may be found compatible with the common market if it facilitates the development of certain economic activities.
V skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES se lahko pomoči spoznajo za skladne s skupnim trgom, če pospešujejo razvoj določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti.
This might, in principle, also apply to restructuring aid in the banking sector.
To bi načeloma lahko veljalo tudi za pomoč za prestrukturiranje v bančnem sektorju.
However, in the case at hand the conditions for the application of this exemption clause are not met.
Vendar pa v zadevnem primeru pogoji za uporabo te posebne določbe niso izpolnjeni.
LBB is not described as an undertaking in difficulty whose viability must be restored with the support of state aid.
LBB ni predstavljena kot podjetje v težavah, čigar vitalnost bi se morala povrniti z državno pomočjo.
Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty, which allows exemptions from the Treaty's state aid rules under certain conditions, is in principle also applicable to the financial services sector.
Člen 86(2) Pogodbe ES, ki pod določenimi pogoji dopušča odstopanja od predpisov o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe, se načeloma uporablja tudi za sektor finančnih storitev.
This has been confirmed by the Commission in its report on Services of general economic interest in the banking sector.
To je Komisija potrdila v svojem poročilu o „storitvah skupnega gospodarskega interesa v bančnem sektorju“.
Germany has not argued that any advantage conferred on LBB by the transfer of WBK's assets was merely compensation for the costs incurred by LBB in the performance of its public-service tasks.
Nemčija ni navedla, da je šlo v primeru, da je LBB na koncu pridobila s prenosom sredstev WBK, le za izravnavo stroškov LBB, nastalih pri opravljanju javnih nalog.
In the Commission's view, it is clear that the transfer was carried out in order to enable LBB to meet the new capital requirements, and not to compensate it for public-service tasks.
Po mnenju Komisije je jasno, da je do prenosa prišlo, da bi LBB lahko izpolnila nove zahteve po lastnem kapitalu in ne da bi se izravnali stroški, ki nastanejo pri opravljanju javnih nalog.
Since no exemption from the principle of the ban on state aid pursuant to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty applies, the aid in question cannot be found compatible with the Treaty.
Ker se odstopanja od načela prepovedi državnih pomoči v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES ne uporabljajo, se zadevna pomoč ne more šteti za skladno s Pogodbo.
NO EXISTING AID
NI VELJAVNE POMOČI
The transfer of WBK's assets cannot be regarded as being covered by the existing state aid scheme for ‘institutional liability’ (Anstaltslast) and ‘guarantor liability’ (Gewährträgerhaftung).
Prenosa sredstev WBK tudi ne moremo upravičiti z obstoječim pravilnikom za pomoč Anstaltslast in Gewährträgerhaftung.
First, Gewährträgerhaftung is a default guarantee offered to creditors in the event that the bank's assets are no longer sufficient to satisfy their claims, and this is not the case here.
Gewährträgerhaftung je jamstvo za upnike v primeru, da sredstva banke ne zadostujejo za izpolnjevanje njihovih zahtev, in to v tem primeru ne velja.
The capital injection is not intended to satisfy LBB's creditors and the bank's assets have not been exhausted.
Vloga kapitala ni namenjena za zadovoljevanje upnikov deželne banke in sredstva banke niso bila izčrpana.
Nor does Anstaltslast apply.
Tudi Anstaltslast tu ne velja.
Anstaltslast requires the guarantor to provide LBB with the resources it needs to function properly for as long as the former decides to maintain it in existence.
Anstaltslast zavezuje garante, da LBB zagotavljajo sredstva, ki jih potrebuje za pravilno delovanje, dokler se garanti ne odločijo za prenehanje njenega obstoja.
However, at the time of the capital injection, LBB was far from being in a situation where it was no longer able to operate properly.
Toda LBB v času vloge kapitala še zdaleč ni bila v položaju, ki ne bi več omogočal pravilnega delovanja.
The capital injection was not needed in order to keep LBB in business.
Vloga kapitala torej ni bila potrebna za ohranjanje pravilnega delovanja LBB.
The conscious economic calculation by the Land as joint owner also enabled LBB to seize future opportunities in its competitive business.
Ta zavestni ekonomski izračun dežele kot solastnice je LBB omogočil, da tudi v prihodnosti izkorišča tržne priložnosti na področju konkurenčnih dejavnosti.
The ‘necessity requirement’ for Anstaltslast does not apply to such a normal economic decision by the Land.
„Zasilni predpis“ programa pomoči Anstaltslast ne velja za tako običajno ekonomsko odločitev dežele.
In the absence of another applicable existing state aid scheme pursuant to Articles 87(1) and 88(1) of the EC Treaty, the capital injection must be classed as new aid within the meaning of Articles 87(1) and 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
Ob odsotnosti drugega uporabnega obstoječega programa pomoči v skladu s členoma 87(1) in 88(1) Pogodbe ES se mora vloga kapitala označiti kot nova pomoč v smislu členov 87(1) in 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
The aid resulting from the transfer of WBK/IBB on 1 January 1993 cannot be found compatible with the common market under either Article 87(2) or (3) of the EC Treaty or under any other provision of that Treaty.
Pomoč, ki izhaja iz prenosa WBK/IBB 1. januarja 1993, se niti na podlagi člena 87(2) ali (3) Pogodbe ES niti na podlagi katere koli druge določbe Pogodbe ne more obravnavati kot združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid is therefore declared incompatible with the common market and must be discontinued.
Zato pomoč ni združljiva s skupnim trgom in jo je treba ukiniti.
The aid element must be recovered by Germany,
Nemčija mora terjati vračilo elementa pomoči –
The state aid amounting to €810,14 million which Germany implemented for Landesbank Berlin — Girozentrale from 1 January 1993 to 31 August 2004 is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 810,14 milijonov EUR, ki jo je Nemčija v času od 1. januarja 1993 do 31. avgusta 2004 odobrila v korist Landesbank Berlin – Girozentrale, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the recipient the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlawfully made available to the recipient.
Nemčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da prejemnica vrne pomoč iz člena 1, ki ji je bila dana na razpolago nezakonito.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law, provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this Decision.
Vračilo se izvede nemudoma in skladno s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, če omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvajanje te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the recipient until the date of its recovery.
Znesek, ki ga je treba vrniti, vključuje obresti, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč prejemnici na razpolago, do datuma dejanskega vračila.
Interest shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.Article 4
Obresti se izračunajo v skladu z določbami iz poglavja V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004.Člen 4
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it, using the questionnaire attached in the Annex to this Decision.
Nemčija obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o tej odločbi o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe tako, da izpolni vprašalnik iz Priloge.
Done at Brussels, 20 October 2004.
V Bruslju, dne 20. oktobra 2004.
OJ L 150, 23.6.2000, p. 1.
UL L 150, 23.6.2000, str. 1.
Joined Cases T-228/99 and T-233/99 [2003] ECR II-435.
PSES 2003, str. II-435.
Paragraphs 32 et seq. and 141 of the Commission decision on restructuring aid for Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Odstavek 32 ff ter 141 Odločbe Komisije o pomoči za prestrukturiranje za Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG (še neobjavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Since 1 May 2002 following the merger of the banking, insurance and stock market regulators: Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BAFin).
Od 1. maja 2002 po združitvi nadzora bank, zavarovalnic in borz: Zvezni zavod za nadzor finančnih storitev (BAFin)
OJ L 386, 30.12.1989, p. 14; replaced by Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 126, 26.5.2000, p. 1).
UL L 386, 30.12.1989, str. 14, ki jo nadomešča Direktiva 2000/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 126, 26.5.2000, str. 1).
OJ L 124, 5.5.1989, p. 16; replaced by Directive 2000/12/EC.
UL L 124, 5.5.1989,str 16, ki je bila nadomeščena z Direktivo 2000/12/ES.
0,25 % before tax and 0,11 % after tax according to a remark in the relevant table submitted for the period 1995-98; however, there is no indication as to which taxes are concerned.
0,25 % pred plačilom davkov in 0,11 % po plačilu davkov v skladu z opombo v ustrezni tabeli za obdobje 1995–1998, vendar ni razlage, za katere davke gre.
OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
UL L 83, 27. 3. 1999, kakor je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003.
This amount was no longer attributed to assets.
Od takrat ta znesek ni več del premoženja.
Confidential information, hereinafter […].
Zaupna informacija; v nadaljnjem besedilu […].
Paragraph 162 of the Decision, see footnote 2.
Glej opombo 2, odstavek 162.
Profit and loss statements published in the Hoppenstedt company database; the 35 banks selected include 4 large private banks, 5 other private banks, 17 public-sector institutions, 2 cooperative banks and 7 mortgage-lending institutions.
Računi dobičkov in izgub, ki so bili objavljeni v podjetniškem listu Hoppenstedt; med 35 izbranimi bankami so 4 zasebne velike banke, 5 drugih zasebnih bank, 17 javnopravnih institucij, 2 zadružni banki in 7 hipotekarnih bank.
Paragraph 182 of the Decision, see footnote 2.
Glej opombo 2, odstavek 182.
Commission decision of 25 July 2001.
NN 53/2001; Odločba Komisije z dne 25. julija 2001.
OJ L 308, 21.12.1995, p. 92.
UL L 308, 21.12.1995, str. 92.
OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28.
UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str. 28.
ECR II-1763.
PSES. 2003, str. II-1763.
Ibid paragraph 60.
Prav tam, odstavek 60.
This amount has since no longer been attributed to IBB's assets.
Od takrat ta znesek ni več premoženje IBB.
Commission communication to the Member States on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3, point 11).
Sporočilo Komisije državam članicam o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe ES in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS o javnih podjetjih v predelovalni industriji (UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3, glej točko 11).
While this communication deals explicitly with the manufacturing sector, the principle can undoubtedly be applied in the same way to all other sectors.
V tem sporočilu gre sicer izključno za predelovalno industrijo, vendar se lahko načelo nedvomno na enak način uporablja v drugih gospodarskih panogah.
As regards financial services, this has been confirmed by a number of Commission decisions, e.g. Crédit Lyonnais (OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28) and GAN (OJ L 78, 16.3.1998, p. 1).
Kar zadeva finančne storitve, je bilo to potrjeno s številnimi odločbami Komisije, na primer v primerih Crédit Lyonnais (UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str. 28) in GAN (UL L 78, 16.3.1998, str. 1).
Paragraph 245 of the judgment, see footnote 3.
Glej opombo 3, odstavek 245.
Paragraph 246 of the judgment, see footnote 3.
Glej opombo 3, odstavek 246.