natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The colour of the signature and the stamp, except where the latter is embossed or watermarked, shall be different from that of the printed form.
Podpis in žig, razen kadar ta ni reliefen ali vodni žig, morata biti drugačne barve kakor tisk.
In the case of meat products containing meat of bovine, ovine, caprine, porcine, soliped, farmed and wild game animals of these species.
Pri mesnih izdelkih, ki vsebujejo meso govedi, ovc, koz, prašičev, kopitarjev, gojene in divje divjadi iz teh vrst.
In the case of meat products containing meat of poultry, farmed and wild game birds, rabbit and wild leporidae.
Pri mesnih izdelkih, ki vsebujejo meso perutnine, gojenih in divjih ptic, kuncev ter divjih leporidov.
Without prejudice to specific certification requirements provided for in Community agreements with third countries.
Brez poseganja v posebne zahteve v zvezi z izdajo spričeval, ki so določene v sporazumih Skupnosti s tretjimi državami.
Poultry specify
Perutnina navedba vrste
Swine Birds (specify) ;
Prašiči Ptiči (navedba vrste) ;
Rabbits Other leporidae (specify) ;
Kunci Drugi leporidi (navedba vrste) ;
Soliped Leporidae (specify) ;
Kopitarji Leporidi (navedba vrste) ;
Zimbabwe [2]
Zimbabve [2]
of 5 May 2006
z dne 5. maja 2006
derogating from Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 as regards the extension of the deadlines for delivering raw tobacco in Greece for the 2005 harvest
o odstopanju od Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 glede prestavitve roka za dostavo surovega tobaka v Grčiji v okviru letine 2005
(notified under document number C(2006) 1784)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1784)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 of 30 June 1992 on the common organisation of the market in raw tobacco [1], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2075/92 z dne 30. junija 1992 o skupni ureditvi trga za surovi tobak [1], in zlasti člena 7 Uredbe,
Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 of 22 December 1998 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2075/92 as regards the premium scheme, production quotas and the specific aid to be granted to producer groups in the raw tobacco sector [2], sets the deadlines for producers to deliver raw tobacco to processors.
Člen 16 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2848/98 z dne 22. decembra 1998 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2075/92 glede sheme premij, proizvodnih kvot in posebne pomoči za skupine proizvajalcev v sektorju surovega tobaka [2] proizvajalcem določa roke za dostavo surovega tobaka podjetjem za predelavo.
Although Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 was repealed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials [3] with effect from 1 January 2006, it continues to apply to the 2005 harvest by virtue of Article 172(3b) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004.
Kljub temu, da je bila Uredba (ES) št. 2848/98 s 1. januarjem 2006 razveljavljena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1973/2004 z dne 29. oktobra 2004 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 v zvezi s shemami podpor, iz naslova IV in IVa navedene uredbe, glede uporabe zemljišč v prahi za proizvodnjo surovin [3], se v skladu s členom 172(3b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1973/2004 še naprej uporablja za letino 2005.
As a result of especially difficult weather conditions in Greece, in particular much higher rainfall and lower temperatures than the seasonal averages, tobacco preparation and delivery operations have been greatly delayed.
Zaradi izredno težkih podnebnih razmer v Grčiji in zlasti veliko večje količine padavin ter občutno nižjih temperatur od sezonskega povprečja je prišlo do precejšnje zamude pri pakiranju in dostavi tobaka.
The deadlines for the delivery of raw tobacco to first processors in Greece should therefore be extended.
Roke za dostavo tobaka podjetjem za prvo predelavo v Grčiji je zato treba prestaviti.
Notwithstanding Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 2848/98, for the 2005 harvest in Greece the deadlines set in that Article are hereby extended by 30 days.
Z odstopanjem od člena 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 2848/98 se roki za letino 2005 v Grčiji, določeni v navedenem členu, prestavijo za 30 dni.
Done at Brussels, 5 May 2006.
V Bruslju, 5. maja 2006
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 263/2006 (OJ L 46, 16.2.2006, p. 24).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 263/2006 (UL L 46, 16.2.2006, str. 24).
appointing two Czech members and two Czech alternate members to the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju dveh članov in dveh nadomestnih članov Odbora regij iz Češke
On 24 January 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/116/EC appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2006 to 25 January 2010 [1].
Svet je 24. januarja 2006 sprejel Sklep 2006/116/ES o imenovanju članov in nadomestnih članov Odbora regij za obdobje od 26. januarja 2006 do 25. januarja 2010 [1].
A seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the expiry of the mandate of Mr František DOHNAL.
Eno mesto člana Odbora regij se je sprostilo po izteku mandata g. Františka DOHNALA.
A second member's seat has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Martin TESAŘÍK.
Še eno mesto člana se je sprostilo po odstopu g. Martina TESAŘÍKA.
An alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment as member of Mr Stanislav JURÁNEK, currently an alternate member.
Eno mesto nadomestnega člana se bo sprostilo po imenovanju sedanjega nadomestnega člana g. Stanislava JURÁNEKA za člana.
A second alternate member's seat will become vacant following the appointment as member of Mr Petr OSVALD, currently an alternate member,
Še eno mesto nadomestnega člana se bo sprostilo po imenovanju sedanjega nadomestnega člana g. Petra OSVALDA za člana –
as members:
kot člana:
Mr Stanislav JURÁNEK, President of the Regional Council of Jihomoravský kraj, in place of Mr František DOHNAL,
Stanislav JURÁNEK, predsednik Sveta regije Jihomoravský kraj, ki nadomesti g. Františka DOHNALA,
Mr Petr OSVALD, Member of the town assembly of the City of Plzeň, Plzeňský kraj in place of Mr Martin TESAŘÍK;
Petr OSVALD, član Mestnega sveta Plzna, Plzeňský kraj, ki nadomesti g. Martina TESAŘÍKA;
as alternate members:
kot nadomestna člana:
Mr Miloš VYSTRČIL, President of the Regional Council of Vysočina kraj, in place of Mr Stanislav JURÁNEK,
Miloš VYSTRČIL, predsednik Sveta regije Vysočina kraj, ki nadomesti g. Stanislava JURÁNEKA,
Mr Martin TESAŘÍK, Lord Mayor of the City of Olomouc, Olomoucký kraj in place of Mr Petr OSVALD.
Martin TESAŘÍK, župan mesta Olomouc, Olomoucký kraj, ki nadomesti g. Petra OSVALDA;
For the remainder of the term of office, which ends on 25 January 2010.
in sicer za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2010.
Done at Luxembourg, 25 April 2006.
V Luxembourgu, 25. aprila 2006
excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)
o izključitvi nekaterih izdatkov držav članic iz naslova Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EKUJS) iz financiranja Skupnosti
(notified under document number C(2006) 1702)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1702)
(Only the Spanish, German, Greek, English, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese, Finnish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedila v angleškem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, portugalskem, španskem in švedskem jeziku so edino verodostojna)
Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70, Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, and Article 8(1) and (2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section [3] provide that the Commission is to make the necessary verifications, inform the Member States of its findings, take account of the Member States' comments, initiate bilateral discussions with a view to reaching agreement with the Member States concerned and then formally communicate its conclusions to them, referring to Commission Decision 94/442/EC of 1 July 1994 setting up a conciliation procedure in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guarantee Section [4].
Člen 5 Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 in člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999, kot tudi člen 8(1) in (2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1663/95 z dne 7. julija 1995 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 v zvezi s postopkom za potrditev obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS [3] določajo, da Komisija opravi potrebna preverjanja, državam članicam sporoči rezultate teh preverjanj, upošteva pripombe držav članic, začne dvostranske razprave za dogovor z zadevnimi državami članicami in le-tem uradno sporoči svoje zaključke sklicujoč se na Odločbo Komisije 94/442/ES z dne 1. julija 1994 o določitvi spravnega postopka v zvezi s potrjevanjem obračuna Jamstvenega oddelka Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada [4].
Pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999, only refunds on exports to third countries and intervention to stabilise agricultural markets, granted and undertaken respectively according to Community rules within the framework of the common organisation of the agricultural markets, may be financed.
Člena 2 in 3 Uredbe (EGS) št. 729/70 in člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1258/1999 določajo, da se lahko financirajo le nadomestila za izvoz v tretje države in intervencije, namenjene ureditvi kmetijskih trgov in dodeljene oziroma zagotovljene skladno s predpisi Skupnosti v okviru skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov.
In the light of the checks carried out, the outcome of the bilateral discussions and the conciliation procedures, part of the expenditure declared by the Member States does not fulfil these requirements and cannot, therefore, be financed under the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
Opravljena preverjanja, izidi dvostranskih razprav in spravni postopki so pokazali, da del izdatkov, ki so jih prijavile države članice, ne izpolnjuje teh pogojev in torej ne more biti financiran iz Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS.
The amounts that are not recognised as being chargeable to the EAGGF Guarantee Section should be indicated. Those amounts do not relate to expenditure incurred more than twenty-four months before the Commission's written notification of the results of the checks to the Member States.
Treba je navesti zneske, ki se ne pokrivajo iz Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS in se ne nanašajo na izdatke, nastale več kot štiriindvajset mesecev pred pisnim sporočilom, v katerem je Komisija države članice obvestila o rezultatih preverjanj.
This Decision is without prejudice to any financial conclusions that the Commission may draw from the judgements of the Court of Justice in cases pending on 25 November 2005 and relating to its content,
Ta odločba ne vpliva na finančne posledice, ki bi jih Komisija lahko imela zaradi sodb Sodišča v primerih, ki so 25. novembra 2005 še nerešeni in se nanašajo na zadeve iz te odločbe –
The expenditure itemised in the Annex hereto that has been incurred by the Member States' accredited paying agencies and declared under the EAGGF Guarantee Section shall be excluded from Community financing because it does not comply with Community rules.
Izdatki pooblaščenih plačilnih agencij držav članic, prijavljeni v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS in navedeni v Prilogi, so izključeni iz financiranja Skupnosti, ker ne ustrezajo predpisom Skupnosti.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Italian Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Belgijo, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo, Kraljevino Španijo, Francosko republiko, Helensko republiko, Italijansko republiko, Kraljevino Nizozemsko, Portugalsko republiko, Republiko Finsko Kraljevino Švedsko in Združeno kraljestvo Velika Britanija in Severna Irska.
Expenditure to exclude from financing
Odhodki, izključeni iz financiranja
Deductions already made
Že narejeni odbitki made
Control deficiencies: 5 % flat-rate correction.
Pomanjkljiv nadzor: pavšalni popravek za 5 %.
Incorrect treatment of result of physical checks: one-off correction
Nepravilno ravnanje z rezultati fizičnega pregleda: posamični popravek
Non-compliance with the requirement to perform unannounced checks.
Nespoštovanje obveznosti nenapovedanega nadzora.
10 % flat-rate correction (1 operator)
Pavšalni popravek za 10 % (1 izvajalec)
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2002/881/EC, amount to be reimbursed to Greece.
Delna razveljavitev Odločbe Komisije 2002/881/ES, znesek se povrne Grčiji
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2003/102/EC, amount to be reimbursed to Greece.
Delna razveljavitev Odločbe Komisije 2003/102/ES, znesek se povrne Grčiji
Miscellaneous
Različne
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC, amount to be reimbursed to Greece.
Delna razveljavitev Odločbe Komisije 2003/481/ES, znesek se povrne Grčiji
Control deficiencies: 5 % flat-rate correction
Pomanjkljiv nadzor: pavšalni popravek za 5 %
Animal premiums
Premije za živino
Premium paid to farmers not having the minimum quota rights.
Premija, plačana kmetom brez pravic do najmanjše kvote.
One-off correction
Posamični popravek
Various shortcomings in the management and control system.
Različne pomanjkljivosti pri upravljalnem in nadzornem sistemu.
5 % flat-rate correction
Pavšalni popravek za 2 %
Partial annulment of Commission Decision 2002/461/EC, amount to be reimbursed to Spain.
Delna razveljavitev Odločbe Komisije 2002/461/ES, znesek se povrne Španiji.
Control w eakness.
Nepopoln nadzor.
5 % flat-rate correction (1 operator)
Pavšalni popravek za 5 % (1 izvajalec)
Ceiling overshoot
Prekoračitev praga
Overshoot of financial ceilings
Preseganje finančnega praga
Total FI
Skupaj FI
Aid over-estimated (calculated on the basis of quantities loaded rather quantities marketed), non-application of sanction in respect of claim submitted after the deadline: one-off correction.
Previsoko ocenjena pomoč (izračunana na podlagi natovorjenih namesto trženih količin), neuporaba kazni za vlogo, predloženo po skrajnem roku: posamični popravek.
Non-performance of several key controls: 10 % flat-rate correction
Neizvajanje več ključnih pregledov: pavšalni popravek za 10 %
Control deficiencies: 5% flat-rate correction.
Pomanjkljiv nadzor: pavšalni popravek za 5 %.
Payment delays: one-off correction
Zamude pri plačilu: posamični popravek
Incorrect application of a procedure for verifying one of the conditions of eligibility.
Nepravilna uporaba postopka za preverjanje enega izmed pogojev ustreznosti.
Non-application of sanctions, deficiencies in controls on composting and bio-degradation.
Neuporaba kazni, pomanjkljiv nadzor kompostiranja in biorazgradnje.
10 % flat-rate correction and one-off correction
Pavšalni popravek za 10 % in posamični popravek
Non-compliance with payment deadlines.
Nespoštovanje plačilnih rokov.
Key controls are not applied in the number, frequency, or depth required by the regulations.
Ključni pregledi se ne uporabijo v številu, pogostosti ali intenzivnosti, ki jih zahtevajo predpisi.
Non-compliance with the regulations: one-off correction.
Neupoštevanje predpisov: posamični popravek.
Failure to apply sanctions.
Neuporaba kazni.
3 % flat-rate correction
Pavšalni popravek za 3 %
Poor quality of classical field inspections.
Slaba kakovost nadzora na kraju samem.
Weaknesses in the management, control and sanctions system.
Slabosti v sistemu upravljanja nadzora in kazni.
2 % flat-rate correction
Pavšalni popravek za 2 %
Payment deadline
Plačilni roki
Failure to meet payment deadlines
Neupoštevanje plačilnih rokov
Unsatisfactory sampling procedure: 10 % flat-rate correction (1 operator).
Nezadovoljiv postopek vzorčenja: pavšalni popravek za 10 % (1 izvajalec).
The control system put in place w as not adequate to prevent irregular practices on the part of all the actors concerned in the flax sector.
Izvajani nadzorni sistem ni omogočal učinkovitega boja proti nepravilnim postopkom, ki so jih izvajali vsi zadevni akterji v sektorju za lan.
100 % financial correction
Finančni popravek za 100 %
Shortcomings in the application of the rules regarding set-aside, incorrect application of technical tolerances, obvious errors applied over-generously.
Nezadostna uporaba pravil glede prahe, nepravilna uporaba tehničnih odstopanj, preveč pogoste očitne napake.
One-off correction.
Posamični popravek
Total SE
Skupaj SE
Unidentified corrections to be credited to EAGGF.
Neopredeljeni popravki, ki se knjižijo v dobro EKUJS.
Nat. Currency
Denarna enota
Non-compliance with minimum rate of control: 10 % flat-rate
Neizpolnjevanje najmanjše stopnje nadzora: pavšalni popravek za 10 % (1 izvajalec)
of 8 May 2006
z dne 8. maja 2006
authorising the Republic of Poland to prohibit on its territory the use of 16 genetically modified varieties of maize with the genetic modification MON 810 listed in the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, pursuant to Council Directive 2002/53/EC
o izdaji dovoljenja Republiki Poljski, da na svojem ozemlju prepove uporabo šestnajstih gensko spremenjenih sort koruze z gensko spremembo MON 810, vpisanih v skupni katalog sort poljščin, v skladu z Direktivo 2002/53/ES
(notified under document number C(2006) 1795)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 1795)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species [1], and in particular Article 16(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/53/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnem katalogu sort poljščin [1], in zlasti člena 16(2)(b) Direktive,
The Commission, in accordance with Article 17 of Directive 2002/53/EC, published on 17 September 2004, in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union a list of 17 genetically modified varieties of maize derived from the genetically modified organism MON 810 in the 13th supplement to the 22nd complete edition of the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species [2].
Komisija je v skladu s členom 17 Direktive 2002/53/ES dne 17. septembra 2004 v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije objavila seznam sedemnajstih gensko spremenjenih sort koruze, pridobljenih iz gensko spremenjenega organizma MON 810, v 13. dodatku k 22. dopolnjeni izdaji skupnega kataloga sort poljščin [2].
Pursuant to Article 16(1) of the said Directive, Member States are to ensure that, with effect from the publication referred to in Article 17, seed of varieties accepted in accordance with that Directive or in accordance with the principles corresponding to those of that Directive is not subject to any marketing restrictions relating to the variety.
Države članice v skladu s členom 16(1) navedene direktive zagotovijo, da od objave iz člena 17 za seme sort, sprejetih v skladu z navedeno direktivo ali v skladu z načeli, ki ustrezajo tistim iz navedene direktive, ne veljajo tržne omejitve, ki zadevajo sorto.
Article 7(4) of the said Directive provides that genetically modified varieties may only be accepted for inclusion in a national catalogue after having been accepted for marketing in accordance with Council Directive 90/220/EEC [3], now replaced by Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [4], which provides for the evaluation of the risks for human health and the environment of genetically modified organisms.
Člen 7(4) navedene direktive določa, da se lahko gensko spremenjene sorte vključijo v nacionalni katalog samo, ko so že bile odobrene za trženje v skladu z Direktivo 90/220/EGS [3], zdaj nadomeščeno z Direktivo 2001/18/ES [4], ki določa ocenitev tveganja za zdravje ljudi in okolje zaradi gensko spremenjenih organizmov.
Commission Decision 98/294/EC of 22 April 1998 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L. line MON 810) decided pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC [5] that consent should be given for the placing on the market of that product.
Z Odločbo Komisije 98/294/ES z dne 22. aprila 1998 o dajanju v promet gensko spremenjene koruze (Zea mays L., linija MON 810) je bilo na podlagi Direktive 90/220/EGS [5] odobreno soglasje za dajanje navedenega proizvoda v promet.
On 3 August 1998, the French authorities effectively allowed the placing on the market of that product.
Francoski organi so 3. avgusta 1998 uradno odobrili dajanje zadevnega proizvoda v promet.
On 31 March 2005, the Commission received from the Republic of Poland a request for the prohibition, on the basis of Article 16(2) of Directive 2002/53/EC, of the use and placing on the market of seed material from 17 genetically modified varieties of maize line MON 810.
Komisija je 31. marca 2005 na podlagi člena 16(2) Direktive 2002/53/ES prejela zahtevo Republike Poljske za prepoved uporabe in dajanja na trg semena 17 gensko spremenjenih sort koruze linije MON 810.
A modified request was sent on 24 June 2005 specifying that it was based on Article 16(2)(b).
Spremenjeni zahtevek s pojasnilom, da temelji na členu 16(2)(b), je bil poslan 24. junija 2005.
On 9 December 2005, Poland informed the Commission that the request does not apply to the Novelis variety mentioned in the original request.
Poljska je 9. decembra 2005 obvestila Komisijo, da se zahtevek ne nanaša na sorto Novelis, navedeno v prvotnem zahtevku.
Poland also specified that the request for the remaining varieties is for an unlimited period of time.
Poljska je prav tako pojasnila, da se zahtevek za ostale sorte nanaša na neomejeno časovno obdobje.
From the information available for the 16 varieties concerned, it is well known that they are not suitable for cultivation in any part of Poland because of their too high maturity class which is at least of 350 FAO index or equivalent maturity class.
Na podlagi razpoložljivih informacij o zadevnih 16 gensko spremenjenih sortah je znano, da niso primerne za gojenje v nobenem delu Poljske zaradi svojih previsokih zrelostnih razredov, ki znašajo najmanj 350 po indeksu FAO ali enakovreden zrelostni razred.
The climatic and agricultural factors concerned provide a permanent obstacle to cultivating these varieties in Poland.
Zadevni podnebni in kmetijski dejavniki so trajna ovira za gojenje teh sort na Poljskem.
Under these circumstances, the application of the Republic of Poland should be granted on the basis of Article 16(2)(b) for the 16 genetically modified varieties of maize concerned.
Glede na ta dejstva se zahtevek Republike Poljske na podlagi člena 16(2)(b) odobri za zadevnih 16 gensko spremenjenih sort koruze.
In order to allow the Commission to inform the other Member States and update the Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species provided for in Directive 2002/53/EC, Poland should be required to inform the Commission when it makes use of the authorisation granted by this Decision.
Da lahko Komisija obvesti druge države članice in posodobi skupni katalog sort poljščin iz Direktive 2002/53/ES, mora Poljska, ko uporabi dovoljenje iz te odločbe, obvestiti Komisijo.
The Republic of Poland has made a similar request for varieties of non-genetically modified maize.
Republika Poljska je predložila podobni zahtevek za sorte koruze, ki niso gensko spremenjene.
As such requests are governed by a different procedure, this will be the subject of a separate decision.
Ker se za take zahtevke uporabljajo drugačni postopki, bodo navedene sorte predmet ločene odločbe.