natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerned carrier(s), including legal entity name (indicated on AOC or equivalent) trading name (if different), AOC number (if available), ICAO airline designation number (if known).
Zadevni prevoznik(-i), vključno z imenom pravne osebe (navedene v spričevalu letalskega prevoznika ali enakovrednem dokumentu), tržnim imenom (če je drugačno), številko spričevala letalskega prevoznika (če je na voljo), oznako letalskega prevoznika ICAO (če je znana).
Reference to the Commission decision
Sklicevanje na odločbo Komisije
date of and reference to any relevant Commission documents
Datum in sklic na ustrezne dokumente Komisije.
date of Commission/Air Safety Committee decision.
Datum odločbe Komisije/Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu.
Safety problem specifically affecting the Member State
Varnostne težave, ki posebej zadevajo državo članico
Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 474/2006
establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council
o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti iz poglavja II Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2111/2005
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005 on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject to an operating ban within the Community and on informing air transport passengers of the identity of the operating air carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/CE [1], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 2111/2005 z dne 14. decembra 2005 o vzpostavitvi seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti, in informiranju potnikov v zračnem prometu o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki opravlja let, ter razveljavitvi člena 9 Direktive 2004/36/ES [1], in zlasti člena 3 Uredbe,
Chapter II of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the basic Regulation’) lays down procedures for establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community as well as procedures allowing the Member States, in certain circumstances, to adopt exceptional measures imposing operating bans within their territory.
Poglavje II Uredbe (ES) št. 2111/2005 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „osnovna uredba“) določa postopke za vzpostavitev seznama Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti, in tudi postopke, ki omogočajo državam članicam, da v nekaterih okoliščinah sprejmejo izredne ukrepe, s katerimi uvedejo prepoved opravljanja letov na njihovem ozemlju.
In accordance with Article 3(3) of the basic Regulation, each Member State communicated to the Commission the identity of the air carriers that are subject to an operating ban in its territory, together with the reasons which led to the adoption of such bans and any other relevant information.
V skladu s členom 3(3) osnovne uredbe je vsaka država članica sporočila Komisiji identiteto letalskih prevoznikov, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov na njenem ozemlju, skupaj z razlogi, zaradi katerih so bile te prepovedi sprejete, in drugimi pomembnimi podatki.
The Commission informed all air carriers concerned either directly or, when this was not practicable, through the authorities responsible for their regulatory oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations which would form the basis for a decision to impose them an operating ban within the Community.
Komisija je obvestila vse zadevne letalske prevoznike neposredno ali, kadar to ni bilo praktično izvedljivo, prek organov, odgovornih za njihov regulativni nadzor, pri čemer je navedla bistvena dejstva in premisleke, ki so podlaga za odločbo o uvedbi prepovedi njihovega opravljanja letov v Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 7 of the basic Regulation, opportunity was given by the Commission to the air carriers concerned to consult the documents provided by Member States, to submit written comments and to make an oral presentation to the Commission within 10 working days and to the Air Safety Committee [2].
V skladu s členom 7 osnovne uredbe je Komisija dala možnost zadevnim letalskim prevoznikom, da imajo vpogled v dokumente, ki so jih zagotovile države članice, da predložijo pisne pripombe in da v 10 delovnih dneh pripravijo ustno predstavitev Komisiji in Odboru za varnost v zračnem prometu [2].
The common criteria for consideration of an operating ban for safety reasons at Community level are set out in the Annex to the basic Regulation.
Skupna merila za prepoved opravljanja letov iz varnostnih razlogov na ravni Skupnosti so določena v Prilogi k osnovni uredbi.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Bangladesh with regard to a certain aircraft of its fleet.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Air Bangladesh glede nekaterih zrakoplovov v njegovi floti.
These deficiencies have been identified during ramp inspections performed by Germany under the SAFA programme [3].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [3], ugotovila Nemčija.
Air Bangladesh did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Germany regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication, as demonstrated by its lack of reply to correspondence from this Member State.
Air Bangladesh se ni ustrezno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Nemčije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na korespondenco iz te države članice.
To date Germany had no opportunity to verify whether the safety deficiencies have been corrected.
Nemčija še do danes ni mogla preveriti, ali so bile varnostne pomanjkljivosti popravljene.
The authorities of Bangladesh with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Bangladesh have not exercised an adequate oversight on one specific aircraft used by this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Bangladeša, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Air Bangladesh, niso opravili ustreznega nadzora nad enim določenim zrakoplovom, ki ga uporablja ta prevoznik, v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Bangladesh should be submitted to a strict operational restriction and included in Annex B.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za Air Bangladesh veljati stroga omejitev opravljanja dejavnosti in da ga je treba vključiti v Prilogo B.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Koryo.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Air Koryo.
These deficiencies have been identified by France and Germany, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [4].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [4], ugotovili Francija in Nemčija.
Persistent failure by Air Koryo to address deficiencies previously communicated by France was identified during other ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [5].
Med drugimi preverjanji na ploščadi, opravljenimi po programu SAFA [5], je bilo ugotovljeno, da Air Koryo vztrajno ne odpravlja pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je predhodno sporočila Francija.
Substantiated and serious incident-related information communicated by France indicates latent systemic safety deficiencies on the part of Air Koryo.
Utemeljeni podatki o resnih incidentih, ki jih je sporočila Francija, navajajo latentne sistemske varnostne pomanjkljivosti Air Koryo.
Air Koryo demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies.
Air Koryo je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo teh varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
Air Koryo did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of France regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication, as demonstrated by the absence of reply to a request by that Member State.
Air Koryo se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Francije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da se ni odzval na zahtevo te države članice.
The corrective action plan presented by Air Koryo in response to France’s request was not adequate and sufficient to correct the identified serious safety deficiencies.
Korekcijski akcijski načrt, ki ga je predstavil Air Koryo kot odgovor na zahtevo Francije, ni bil primeren in zadovoljiv za popravo ugotovljenih resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
The authorities of the Democratic People Republic of Korea with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Koryo have not exercised an adequate oversight on this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Demokratične ljudske republike Koreje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Air Koryo, niso opravili ustreznega nadzora nad tem prevoznikom v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Koryo does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Air Koryo ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of certain aircraft operated by Ariana Afghan Airlines.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih nekaterih zrakoplovov, ki jih upravlja Ariana Afghan Airlines.
These deficiencies have been identified by Germany, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [6].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [6], ugotovila Nemčija.
Ariana Afghan Airlines demonstrated a lack of ability to address these safety deficiencies.
Ariana Afghan Airlines je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
Ariana Afghan Airlines did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Germany regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of communication, as demonstrated by the absence of adequate response to correspondence from this Member State.
Ariana Afghan Airlines se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Nemčije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni ustrezno odgovoril na korespondenco iz te države članice.
The competent authorities of Afghanistan, where the aircraft used by Ariana Afghan Airlines is registered, have not exercised a fully adequate oversight of the aircraft used by this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Pristojni organi Afganistana, kjer je registriran zrakoplov, ki ga uporablja Ariana Afghan Airlines, niso opravili popolnoma ustreznega nadzora nad zrakoplovom, ki ga uporablja ta letalski prevoznik, v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Ariana Afghan does not meet the relevant safety standards for all the aircraft it operates, with the exception of A310 registration number F-GYYY which is registered in France and subject to the oversight of the French authorities.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Ariana Afghan ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov za vse zrakoplove, ki jih upravlja, razen zrakoplova A310 z registrsko številko F-GYYY, ki je registriran v Franciji in je pod nadzorom francoskih organov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of BGB Air.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih BGB Air.
These deficiencies have been identified by Italy, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [7].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [7]; ugotovila Italija.
BGB Air demonstrated a lack of ability or willingness to address safety deficiencies as demonstrated by the submission of a self-assessment with ICAO Standards on the basis of the Foreign Operator Check List provided by Italy, which was found not to be in conformity with the subsequent findings of SAFA inspections.
BGB Air je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti ali pripravljenosti za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti, kar je razvidno iz predložene samoocene s standardi ICAO na podlagi kontrolnega seznama tujih operaterjev (Foreign Operator Check List), ki ga je zagotovila Italija, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da ni v skladu z ugotovitvami poznejših pregledov SAFA.
BGB Air did not respond adequately to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Italy, regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication, as demonstrated by the absence of reply to some correspondence sent by this Member State.
BGB Air se ni primerno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Italije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
There is no evidence of the implementation of an adequate corrective action plan presented by BGB Air to correct the serious safety deficiencies in response to the request from Italy.
Ni dokazov o izvedbi ustreznega korekcijskega akcijskega načrta, ki ga je predstavil BGB Air, da bi popravil resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti kot odgovor na zahtevo Italije.
The authorities of Kazakhstan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of BGB Air did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of Italy when concerns about the safety of the operation of BGB Air certified in that state were raised, as demonstrated by the absence of reply to the correspondence sent by this Member State.
Organi Kazahstana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad BGB Air, niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Italije, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki o varnosti delovanja BGB Air, certificiranega v tej državi, kar je razvidno iz tega, da niso odgovorili na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that BGB Air does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da BGB Air ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Buraq Air concerning its cargo operations.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Buraq Air, kar zadeva njegovo dejavnost prevoza tovora.
These deficiencies have been identified by Sweden and the Netherlands, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [8].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [8], ugotovili Švedska in Nizozemska.
Buraq Air did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Germany regarding the safety aspect of its Cargo operations showing a lack of transparency or communication, as demonstrated by a lack of response to correspondence from this Member State.
Buraq Air se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Nemčije glede varnostnega vidika dejavnosti prevoza tovora, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na korespondenco iz te države članice.
The authorities of Libya with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Buraq Air have not exercised an adequate oversight on the Cargo operations of this carrier in accordance with their obligations under the Chicago Convention.
Organi Libije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Buraq Air, niso opravili ustreznega nadzora nad dejavnostmi prevoza tovora tega prevoznika v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz Čikaške konvencije.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Buraq Air should be subject to strict operational restrictions and included in Annex B.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za Air Buraq veljati stroga omejitev opravljanja dejavnosti in da ga je treba vključiti v Prilogo B.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Service Comores.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Air Service Comores.
These deficiencies have been identified by a Member State, France, during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [9].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [9], ugotovila država članica Francija.
There is no evidence of the implementation of an adequate corrective action plan presented by Air Service Comores to correct the identified serious safety deficiencies in response to the request from France.
Ni dokazov o izvedbi ustreznega korekcijskega akcijskega načrta, ki ga je predstavil Air Service Comores, da bi popravil resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti kot odgovor na zahtevo Francije.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Air Service Comores have shown a lack of ability to address safety deficiencies.
Organi, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Air Service Comores, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Comores did not cooperate in due time with the civil aviation authority of France when concerns about the safety of the operation of a carrier licensed or certified in that state were raised.
Organi, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad Komori, niso pravočasno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Francije, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki glede varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika, ki je licenciran ali certificiran v tej državi.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Air Service Comores does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Air Service Comores ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of GST Aero Air Company.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih GST Aero Air Company.
These deficiencies have been identified by Italy, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [10].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [10], ugotovila Italija.
GST Aero Air Company demonstrated a lack of ability or willingness to address safety deficiencies.
GST Aero Air Company je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti ali pripravljenosti za odpravo varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
GST Aero Air Company did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of Italy regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication as demonstrated by the absence of reply to the correspondence sent by this Member State.
GST Aero Air Company se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Italije glede varnostnega vidika svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
There is no evidence of the implementation of an adequate corrective action plan presented by GST Aero Air Company to correct the serious safety deficiencies in response to Italy’s request.
Ni dokazov o izvedbi ustreznega korekcijskega akcijskega načrta, ki ga je predstavil GST Aero Air Company, da bi popravil resne varnostne pomanjkljivosti kot odgovor na zahtevo Italije.
The authorities of Kazakhstan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of GST Aero Air Company did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of Italy when concerns about the safety of the operation of a carrier licensed or certified in that state were raised, as demonstrated by the limited reply to the correspondence sent by Italy.
Organi Kazahstana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad GST Aero Air Company, niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Italije, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki o varnosti dejavnosti prevoznika, licenciranega ali certificanega v tej državi, kar je razvidno iz omejenega odgovora na dopise, ki jih je poslala Italija.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that GST Aero Air Company does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da GST Aero Air Company ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Kirghizstan have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards with regard to Phoenix Aviation.
Organi Kirgistana, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov glede Phoenix Aviation.
While Phoenix Aviation’s Air Operator’s Certificate was issued by Kyrgyzstan, there is evidence showing s that the airline has its principal place of business in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Čeprav je spričevalo letalskega prevoznika za Phoenix Aviation izdal Kirgistan, obstajajo dokazi, da ima prevoznik glavni sedež v Združenih arabskih emiratih (ZAE), kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami iz Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
The US National Transportation Safety Board’s Factual Report [11] into an accident involving Kam Air flight 904, which was operated by Phoenix Aviation, states that Phoenix Aviation has its headquarters in the UAE.
Poročilo o dejanskem stanju [11], ki ga je pripravil ameriški „National Transportation Safety Board“ v zvezi z nesrečo pri letu 904 Kam Air, ki ga je upravljal Phoenix Aviation, navaja, da ima Phoenix Aviation svoj sedež v ZAE.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Phoenix Aviation does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Phoenix Aviation ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Phuket Airlines.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Phuket Airlines.
These deficiencies have been identified by Member States, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, during ramp inspections performed under the SAFA programme [12].
Te pomanjkljivosti sta med preverjanji na ploščadi, izvedenimi po programu SAFA [12], ugotovili državi članici Združeno kraljestvo in Nizozemska.
Phuket Airlines demonstrated a lack of ability to address timely and adequately these safety deficiencies.
Phuket Airlines je pokazal pomanjkanje sposobnosti, da pravočasno in ustrezno odpravi te varnostne pomanjkljivosti.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Thailand did not fully cooperate with the civil aviation authority of the Netherlands when concerns about the safety of Phuket Airlines certified in that state were raised as demonstrated by the lack of pertinent responses to the correspondence from this Member State.
Organi Tajske, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso polno sodelovali z upravo za civilno letalstvo Nizozemske, ko so bili izraženi pomisleki o varnosti delovanja Phuket Airlines, certificiranega v tej državi, kar je razvidno iz pomanjkanja ustreznih odgovorov na korespondenco iz te države članice.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that Phuket Airlines does not meet the relevant safety standards.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da Phuket Airlines ne izpolnjuje ustreznih varnostnih standardov.
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Reem Air.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Reem Air.