natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to allow exporting producers in Ukraine to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent claim forms to the Ukrainian exporting producers known to be concerned.
Da bi lahko proizvajalci izvozniki v Ukrajini predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija ukrajinskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, poslala obrazce za zahtevek.
Claims for MET, or for IT in case the investigation establishes that they do not meet the conditions for MET, were received from three groups of exporting producers and their related companies.
Zahtevek za TGO ali, če preiskava pokaže, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO, zahtevek za IO, so poslale tri skupine proizvajalcev izvoznikov in njihove povezane družbe.
Replies were received from three Romanian exporting producers together with their two related companies, two groups of Russian exporting producers together with five related companies, three of them located in the Community, and three groups of Ukrainian exporting producers and their related companies.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike so poslali trije romunski proizvajalci izvozniki ter dve njihovi povezani družbi, dve skupini ruskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in pet njihovih povezanih družb, trije izmed njih s sedežem v Skupnosti, ter tri skupine ukrajinskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in njihove povezane družbe.
Questionnaire replies were also received from five Community producers.
Izpolnjene vprašalnike je poslalo tudi pet proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Although six importers replied to the sampling form, only three cooperated by submitting a full questionnaire reply.
Čeprav je obrazec za vzorčenje izpolnilo šest uvoznikov, pa so le trije predložili v celoti izpolnjen vprašalnik.
Another importer agreed to have a verification visit carried out at its premises, despite the fact that it did not submit a questionnaire reply.
Drug uvoznik se je strinjal s preveritvenim obiskom v svojih prostorih kljub temu, da ni predložil izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of a determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest.
Komisija je iskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za ugotovitev dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi tega nastala, in interesa Skupnosti.
Dalmine S.p.A., Bergamo, Italy
Dalmine S.p.A., Bergamo, Italija
Rohrwerk Maxhütte GmbH, Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany
Rohrwerk Maxhütte GmbH, Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Nemčija
Tubos Reunidos S.A., Amurrio, Spain
Tubos Reunidos S.A., Amurrio, Španija
Vallourec & Mannesmann France S.A., Boulogne Billancourt, France
Vallourec & Mannesmann France S.A., Boulogne Billancourt, Francija
V & M Deutschland GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany
V & M Deutschland GmbH, Düsseldorf, Nemčija
Exporting producers in Romania
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Romuniji
Exporting producers in Russia
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Rusiji
Volzhsky Pipe Works Open Joint Stock Company (‘Volzhsky’), Volzhsky
Volzhsky Pipe Works Open Joint Stock Company („Volzhsky“), Volzhsky
Joint Stock Company Taganrog Metallurgical Works (‘Tagmet’), Taganrog
Joint Stock Company Taganrog Metallurgical Works („Tagmet“), Taganrog
Joint Stock Company Pervouralsky Novotrubny Works (‘Pervouralsky’), Pervouralsk
Joint Stock Company Pervouralsky Novotrubny Works („Pervouralsky“), Pervouralsk
Joint Stock Company Chelyabinsk Tube Rolling Plant (‘Chelyabinsk’), Chelyabinsk
Joint Stock Company Chelyabinsk Tube Rolling Plant („Chelyabinsk“), Chelyabinsk
Related company in Russia
Povezana družba v Rusiji
Exporting producers in Ukraine
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Ukrajini
Related trader in Ukraine
Povezani trgovec v Ukrajini
SPIG Interpipe, Dnepropetrovsk, related to NTRP and Niko Tube
SPIG Interpipe, Dnepropetrovsk, povezan z NTRP in Niko Tube
Related trader in Switzerland
Povezani trgovec v Švici
SEPCO S.A., Lugano, related to NTRP and Niko Tube
SEPCO S.A., Lugano, povezan z NTRP in Niko Tube
Sinara Handel GmbH, Köln, related to Artrom
Sinara Handel GmbH, Köln, povezan z Artrom
Thyssen Krupp Energostal S.A., Torun, Poland
Thyssen Krupp Energostal S.A., Torun, Poljska
Assotubi S.P.A., Cesena, Italy
Assotubi S.P.A., Cesena, Italija
Bandini Sider S.R.L., Imola, Italy
Bandini Sider S.R.L., Imola, Italija.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2004 (the ‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2004 do 31. decembra 2004 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 to the end of the IP (‘the period considered’).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product concerned is certain seamless pipes and tubes (‘SPT’), of iron or steel, of circular cross-section, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm with a Carbon Equivalent Value (CEV) not exceeding 0,86 according to the International Institute of Welding (IIW) formula and chemical analysis.
Zadevni izdelek zajema določene brezšivne cevi („BC“) iz železa ali jekla, s krožnim prečnim prerezom, z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm, z ekvivalentom ogljika (CEV) do vključno 0,86 v skladu s formulo in kemično analizo Mednarodnega inštituta za varilstvo.
The product concerned is currently classified under CN codes ex73041010, ex73041030, ex73042100, ex73042911, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 and ex73045993 [12] (TARIC codes 7304101020, 7304103020, 7304210020, 7304291120, 7304318030, 7304395830, 7304399230, 7304399320, 7304518930, 7304599230 and 7304599320).
Zadevni izdelek je trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73041010, ex73041030, ex73042100, ex73042911, ex73043180, ex73043958, ex73043992, ex73043993, ex73045189, ex73045992 in ex73045993 [12] (oznake TARIC 7304101020, 7304103020, 7304210020, 7304291120, 7304318030, 7304395830, 7304399230, 7304399320, 7304518930, 7304599230 in 7304599320).
The product concerned is used in a wide variety of applications, like line pipes to transport liquids, in the construction business for piling, for mechanical uses, gas tubes, boiler tubes and oil and country tubular goods (‘OCTG’) for drilling, casing and tubing for the oil industry.
Zadevni izdelek se uporablja v različne namene, na primer za cevovode za tekočine, v gradbeništvu za pilote, za mehansko uporabo, za plinovode, toplotne cevi ter cevi, znane kot cevi OCTG („oil country tubular goods“), ki se v naftni industriji uporabljajo kot vrtalne, zaščitne in proizvodne cevi.
SPT take very different forms at the time of their delivery to the users.
BC so pri dobavi uporabnikom različnih oblik.
They can be e.g. galvanized, threaded, delivered as green tubes (i.e. without any heat treatment), with special ends, different cross-sections, cut to size or not.
Cevi so lahko pocinkane, navojne, dobavljene kot „green tubes“ (tj. niso toplotno obdelane), s posebnim zaključkom, z različnimi krožnimi prečnimi prerezi, razrezane ali nerazrezane.
There are no generalized standard sizes for the tubes, which explains why most of the SPT are made upon customers' order.
Ni splošnih standardnih velikosti cevi, zato je večina BC izdelana po naročilu.
SPT are normally connected by welding.
BC so običajno zvarjene.
However, in particular cases they can be connected by their thread or be used alone, although they remain weldable.
V posebnih primerih pa se lahko povežejo z navoji ali se uporabljajo nepovezane, vendar pa se lahko še vedno zvarijo.
The investigation showed that all SPT share the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and the same basic uses.
Preiskava je pokazala, da imajo vse BC enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter osnovno uporabo.
The definition of the product scope of this proceeding was contested by some interested parties.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so opredelitev obsega izdelka v tem postopku spodbijale.
Firstly, some parties alleged that some product types included in the product description have different basic mechanical and chemical characteristics (see recitals (21) to (26)).
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da imajo nekatere vrste izdelka, vključene v opis izdelka, različne osnovne mehanske in kemijske lastnosti (glej uvodne izjave (21) do (26)).
Secondly, several claims challenged the use of the weldability criterion and the CEV threshold which are linked (see recitals (27) to (36)).
Številni so tudi nasprotovali uporabi merila varjenja in s tem povezanega praga ekvivalenta ogljika (CEV) (glej uvodne izjave (27) do (36)).
Furthermore, one party requested that so-called ‘certified SPT’ should be exempted from the product scope (see recital (37)).
Ena stranka je tudi zahtevala, da je treba tako imenovane „certificirane BC“ izvzeti iz obsega uporabe (glej uvodno izjavo (37)).
Other basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and end-uses
Druge osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe
It was alleged that some product types included in the product description, namely the OCTG and gas tubes, would have different basic mechanical and chemical characteristics and end-uses as compared to the other SPTs and would not be interchangeable.
Trdilo se je, da imajo nekatere vrste izdelka, vključene v opis izdelka, namreč OCTG in cevi za plinovod, v primerjavi z drugimi BC različne osnovne mehanske in kemijske lastnosti ter končne uporabe in niso zamenljive.
The product as defined consists in different product types.
Opredelitev izdelka zajema različne vrste izdelka.
However, product types falling in different segments (including bottom end and top end) will be considered as forming a single product if there are no clear dividing lines between the various segments, i.e. if there is some overlapping and competition between adjoining segments.
Vendar pa se za vrste izdelka, ki sodijo v različne segmente (vključno s tistimi iz najnižjega in tistimi iz najvišjega tržnega segmenta), šteje, da predstavljajo en sam izdelek, če ni jasnih ločnic med različnimi segmenti, tj. če se nekateri segmenti prekrivajo in med njimi vlada konkurenca.
This is the case in the present proceeding, as evidence was submitted that the alloyed and non-alloy tubes subject to investigation could be used for the same end-uses, and that there are no clear dividing lines inside both the non-alloyed and the alloyed tubes categories.
To velja v primeru tega postopka, saj so bili predloženi dokazi, da bi lahko imele legirane in nelegirane cevi, ki so predmet preiskave, isto končno uporabo in da ni jasnih ločnic znotraj kategorij nelegiranih in legiranih cevi.
As regards the OCTG and gas tubes, the investigation showed that they have, inter alia, comparable chemical characteristics to the remaining SPT types since they fall within the 0,86 CEV threshold.
Kar zadeva OCTG in cevi za plinovod, je preiskava pokazala, da imajo, med drugim, kemijske lastnosti, primerljive z preostalimi vrstami BC, saj so pod pragom CEV 0,86.
Furthermore, they share other basic characteristics with the remaining product types, such as outside diameter and wall thickness.
Poleg tega imajo druge skupne osnovne lastnosti s preostalimi vrstami izdelka, kot na primer zunanji premer in debelino sten.
As far as the end-uses of the OCTG and gas tubes are concerned, certain exporting producers argued that OCTG and gas tubes would be used in different applications and not be interchangeable with the remaining SPT types.
Kar zadeva končno uporabo OCTG in cevi za plinovod, so nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki trdili, da se OCTG in cevi za plinovod uporabljajo v različne namene in niso zamenljive s preostalimi vrstami BC.
In this respect, it was found that plain end OCTGs currently classified under CN code 73042100 and used in the construction sector are interchangeable with other non-alloy steel tubes currently classified under CN code 73043958.
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so cevi vrste OCTG brez navojev, ki se trenutno uvršajo pod oznako KN 73042100 in uporabljajo v gradbenem sektorju, zamenljive z drugimi cevmi iz nelegiranega jekla, ki se uvrščajo pod oznako KN 73043958.
There is therefore at least a partial overlap as regards the end-use of the different SPT types.
Torej vsaj kar zadeva končno uporabo različnih vrst BC, se te delno prekrivajo.
On the basis of the above, the claim that, on the one hand, OCTG and gas tubes and, on the other hand, other SPT types are not interchangeable is rejected.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se trditev, da OCTG in cevi za plinovod ter druge vrste BC niso zamenljive, zavrne.
CEV is a chemical characteristic of the product
Ekvivalent ogljika (CEV) je kemijska lastnost izdelka
Another exporting producer claimed that the CEV was not a chemical characteristic of the product, since it is not directly linked to the chemical composition of an SPT, but is a function of it.
Drugi proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da CEV ni kemijska lastnost izdelka, ker ni neposredno povezana s kemijsko sestavo BC, ampak je njena funkcija.
Whereas it is true that the CEV is the result of a formula, the formula is directly linked to the chemical composition of the product, and allows a comparison of different grades of steel regarding the weldability.
Res je, da je CEV rezultat formule, ampak ta formula je neposredno povezana s kemijsko sestavo izdelka in omogoča primerjavo različnih vrst jekla glede na varljivost.
The CEV is not linked either to any technical or mechanical characteristic of steel, and solely depends on its chemical composition.
CEV ni povezan niti s tehničnimi niti z mehanskimi lastnostmi jekla in je odvisen le od njegove kemijske sestave.
On this basis, it is considered that the CEV is a chemical characteristic of the product, and this claim was rejected.
Na podlagi tega se šteje, da je CEV kemijska lastnost izdelka, zato je bila trditev zavrnjena.
Weldability being an unsuitable criterion to determine the product scope
Varljivost – neprimerno merilo za določitev obsega izdelka
Some parties argued that the criterion of weldability as such is an irrelevant property for the product concerned since a significant part of the products included in the product scope (threaded tubes and OCTG tubes) are claimed not to be ever welded.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da je merilo varljivosti kot tako nepomembna lastnost zadevnega izdelka, saj velik del izdelkov, vključenih v obseg izdelka (navojne cevi in cevi OCTG) naj ne bi bil nikoli varjen.
It was therefore claimed that by using weldability as a criterion, different products were artificially being considered as one single product.
Zato so trdili, da se z uporabo merila varljivosti različni izdelki umetno štejejo kot en sam izdelek.
It should firstly be noted that weldability is indeed a chemical and technical characteristic (since it depends on the chemical composition of a steel and determines the weldability of it) common to all SPT.
Najprej je treba opomniti, da je varljivost res kemijska in tehnična lastnost (ker je odvisna od kemijske sestave jekla in določa njeno varljivost), enaka za vse BC.
As most of SPT are connected by welding, it is an essential feature for the definition of the product.
Ker je večina BC varjenih, je to bistvena lastnost za opredelitev izdelka.
Secondly, with regard to threaded tubes and OCTG which might usually not be welded, the investigation showed that they remain nevertheless weldable and thus also share this basic chemical and technical characteristic.
Drugič, glede navojnih cevi in OCTG, ki ponavadi niso varjene, je preiskava pokazala, da so kljub temu še vedno varljive in imajo torej enake osnovne kemijske in tehnične lastnosti.
Moreover, it cannot be excluded that threaded or threadable SPT as well as OCTG would be transformed into weldable SPT by a simple removal action.
Poleg tega tudi ni mogoče izključiti, da bi se BC ter OCTG že s samo odstranitvijo lahko spremenile v BC, ki jih je mogoče variti.
In particular as regards OCTG, there is evidence that the same tube may be classified under two different categories (and even CN codes) purely depending on its end use, i.e. usage in the construction or in the oil drilling industry.
Zlasti kar zadeva OCTG, obstajajo dokazi, da se lahko enaka cev uvrsti v dve različni kategoriji (in celo dve oznaki KN) le glede na njeno končno uporabo, tj. uporabo v gradbeništvu ali za vrtanje nafte.
Finally, it was found that certain imports from the countries concerned which had been classified as OCTG had not been used in the oil/gas sector.
Nazadnje je bilo ugotovljeno, da se nekateri uvoženi izdelki iz zadevnih držav, ki se niso uvrščali kot OCTG, niso uporabljali v sektorju za nafto in plin.
An exporter submitted that according to European Norms, only one steel grade is suitable for threadable tubes, and that these products could thus be distinguished from other SPTs.
En izvoznik je trdil, da je v skladu z evropskimi standardi le ena vrsta jekla primerna za navojne cevi in da se lahko ti izdelki tako razlikujejo od drugih BC.
However, the analysis of the different norms existing for OCTG in particular has shown that there is not a unique steel grade which can be used for producing threadable tubes.
Vendar pa je analiza različnih standardov, ki obstajajo za zlasti za OCTG pokazala, da ne obstaja enotna vrsta jekla, ki bi se uporabljala za izdelavo navojnih cevi.
Given the above, the weldability of SPT is considered a suitable criterion to determine the product scope.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno se varljivost BC šteje za ustrezno merilo za opredelitev izdelka.
The argument that the proposed definition of the product is artificially grouping different products is therefore rejected.
Utemeljitev, da je predlagana opredelitev izdelka umetno združevanje različnih izdelkov, se zato zavrne.
CEV threshold being unsuitable to determine the weldability of SPT
Prag ekvivalenta vodika (CEV) neprimeren za določitev varljivosti BC
It was claimed that the use of the CEV threshold was not a criterion allowing to define the product scope as it would not be a suitable criterion to determine the weldability of different types of SPT.
Trdilo se je, da uporaba praga CEV ni merilo, ki bi omogočalo opredelitev obsega izdelka, ker naj ne bi bilo ustrezno merilo za določitev varljivosti različnih vrst BC.
The investigation showed that the CEV is indeed an indicator which is directly linked at the same time to the chemical composition of the steel and to its weldability.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je CEV dejansko kazalnik, ki je hkrati neposredno povezan s kemijsko sestavo jekla in njeno varljivostjo.
A high CEV not only means that the steel contains more carbon and/or alloys but also means that the steel is less easy to weld.
Visoka vrednost CEV ne pomeni le, da vsebuje jeklo več ogljika in/ali zlitin, ampak tudi, da se jeklo težje vari.
On the other hand, a lower CEV value means that the steel is less rich in carbon and/or alloys and also easier to weld.
Po drugi strani pa nižja vrednost CEV pomeni, da vsebuje jeklo manj ogljika in/ali zlitin in ga je mogoče lažje variti.
In other words, different levels of CEV require different conditions for welding.
Povedano drugače, različne ravni CEV zahtevajo različne pogoje varjenja.
A steel with a level of CEV of 0,86 will already require special welding conditions and therefore not normally be welded.
Jeklo s CEV 0,86 zahteva posebne pogoje za varjenje in se zato običajno ne vari.
Thus, as the CEV is an indicator of the weldability, the CEV threshold was considered a relevant criterion for the determination of the product scope.
Ker je torej CEV pokazatelj varljivosti, se je prag CEV štel za ustrezno merilo za določitev obsega izdelka.
An exporting producer claimed that the CEV was only one of many chemical, technical and mechanical characteristics of the steel, and therefore could not be used alone to define the product scope.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da je CEV le ena izmed številnih kemijskih, tehničnih in mehanskih lastnosti jekla in se zato to merilo samo ne more uporabiti za opredelitev obsega izdelka.
It is noted in this regard that the CEV is considered a suitable criterion to determine the product scope.
Opomniti je treba, da se zato CEV šteje kot ustrezno merilo za določitev obsega izdelka.
Moreover, as the product definition shows, CEV is not the only criterion used.
Kot kaže opredelitev izdelka, CEV ni edino uporabljeno merilo.
Last but not least, the comparability of product types was done on a more detailed basis, taking into account various characteristics of the product (e.g. dimensions and heat treatment).
Nenazadnje je bila primerjava vrst izdelka izvedena natančneje, upoštevane so bile različne lastnosti izdelka (npr. dimenzije in toplotna obdelava).
CEV of 0,86 was set in an arbitrary manner
CEV 0,86 je bil določen poljubno
Moreover, some interested parties alleged that the threshold CEV of 0,86 was set in an arbitrary manner as the limit for easy weldabilty would be lower than 0,86.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so tudi trdile, da je bil prag CEV 0,86 določen poljubno, saj naj bi bila meja za enostavno varjenje nižja od 0,86.
However, the CEV value of 0,86 is not linked to the concept of easy weldability.
Vendar pa vrednost CEV 0,86 ni povezana s konceptom enostavnega varjenja.
Indeed, the complainant Community industry argued and provided evidence that it represents the maximum CEV value for a non-alloyed steel that can be used for SPT according to the European norms.
Pritožnik industrije Skupnosti je dejansko trdil in predložil dokaze, da je to največja vrednost CEV za nelegirano jeklo, ki se lahko uporabi za BC v skladu z evropskimi normami.
Therefore, it is concluded that both the use of the CEV and the defined threshold of 0,86 capture a range of products which can be considered as a single product, albeit excluding from the definition, for instance, stainless steel or ball bearing tubes, which have CEV values higher than 0,86.
Zato se sklene, da uporaba CEV in prag, določen v višini 0,86, zajemata številne izdelke, ki se lahko štejejo za en sam izdelek, čeprav se iz opredelitve, na primer, izvzame nerjavno jeklo ali cevi s krogličnimi ležaji z vrednostmi CEV več kot 0,86.
On the basis of the above, the CEV threshold as proposed by the applicant was maintained in the definition of the product concerned.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se prag CEV, ki jo je predlagal pritožnik, za opredelitev zadevnega izdelka ohrani.
‘Certified SPT’
„Certificirane BC“
One of the importers in the Community claimed that so called ‘certified’ SPT should not fall within the product scope.
Eden od uvoznikov Skupnosti je trdil, da tako imenovane „certificirane“ BC ne smejo soditi v obseg izdelka.
These SPT are produced according to a certified procedure approved by the Italian Ministry for Public Works and used in consolidation works in construction projects in Italy.
Te BC so izdelane v skladu s postopkom certificiranja, ki ga je potrdilo italijansko ministrstvo za javne gradnje in ki je bilo uporabljeno pri postopku utrjevanja pri gradbenih projektih v Italiji.
However, it was established that all types of the product concerned, including certified SPT, had the same basic physical, chemical and technical characteristics and end-uses.
Vendar pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo vse vrste zadevnega izdelka, tudi certificirane BC, enake osnovne fizikalne, kemijske in tehnične lastnosti ter končne uporabe.
No evidence was found which would have allowed to conclude that these certified tubes would be a different product and should therefore be excluded from the scope of the measures (nor did the company provide any such evidence).
Na voljo ni bilo dokazov, na podlagi katerih bi lahko sklepali, da so te certificirane cevi različni izdelki in jih je zato treba izključiti iz obsega ukrepov (tudi zadevna družba takih dokazov ni predložila).