natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, it considered that depreciation of buildings and amortisation of land use rights were not a company-specific issue and there was not any benefit accruing to the Chinese authorities.
Prav tako je menil, da amortizacija nepremičnin in pravic do rabe zemljišč ni vprašanje, ki bi bilo specifično za podjetja, in da kitajske oblasti od tega nimajo nobenih koristi.
These arguments had to be rejected.
Te argumente je bilo treba zavrniti.
Firstly, although the mere existence of a joint venture such as the one in the current investigation does not indicate State interference, the Articles of Association contain mechanisms that allow the State to interfere.
Prvič, kljub temu, da sam obstoj skupnega vlaganja, kot na primer skupnega vlaganja iz trenutne preiskave, ne kaže na državno poseganje, pa statut vsebuje mehanizem, ki državi poseganje dovoljuje.
In particular, the right of the Chinese partner (i.e. the local authorities) to claim compensation is not limited to the case where rent is not paid.
Še zlasti pravica kitajskega partnerja (tj. lokalnih oblasti) do nadomestila ni omejena na primer, ko najemnina ni plačana.
The rights of the Chinese partner are thus wider than those of a mere landlord.
Pravice kitajskega partnerja so tako obsežnejše od pravic lastnika.
Secondly, rent was due to the State for the first years of operation.
Drugič, državi bi se morala plačati najemnina za prvo leto poslovanja.
Any exemption from such payment obligation should have been provided for in the contract.
Vsaka oprostitev obveznosti takšnega plačila bi morala biti predvidena v pogodbi.
Finally, the fact that the applicant admitted that depreciation of buildings and amortisation of land use rights are not determined by the companies themselves reinforces the conclusion that the State could significantly interfere in the business decisions of the applicant.
Vlagateljevo priznanje, da amortizacije nepremičnin in pravice do rabe zemljišč ne določijo podjetja sama, nazadnje potrjuje zaključek, da država lahko občutno posega v poslovne odločitve vlagatelja.
The applicant’s main argument on criterion 2 was that the IAS have not been adopted by the accounting profession in the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
Vlagateljev glavni argument v zvezi z MRS 2 je bil, da računovodska stroka v LRK ni sprejela MRS.
The applicant admitted that they were not followed, but considered that the IAS mentioned by the Commission were not applicable in the IP.
Vlagatelj je priznal, da MRS niso bili upoštevani, vendar je menil, da MRS, ki jih je navedla Komisija, v OP niso veljali.
However, it was found that all the IAS provisions set out in recital 17 were in force during the IP.
Kljub temu je bilo ugotovljeno, da so med OP veljale vse določbe MRS iz uvodne izjave (17).
In its comments to the final disclosure, the applicant argued that the determination not to grant MET to the two related Chinese producers was not made within three months of the initiation of the investigation as provided for in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Vlagatelj je v svojih pripombah do končnega razkritja trdil, da odločitev, da se TGO dvema povezanima kitajskima proizvajalcema ne odobri, ni bila izvedena v treh mesecih od začetka preiskave, kot je določeno v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
According to the applicant, this had an influence on the Commission’s decision not to verify the information provided by some of its related companies and by the producer in the analogue country, which had a prejudicial effect on the outcome of the investigation.
Po mnenju vlagatelja je to vplivalo na odločitev Komisije, da ne preveri informacij, ki so jih predložila nekatera njegova povezana podjetja in proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, kar je imelo škodljiv vpliv na rezultate preiskave.
As regards the argument concerning the three-month time limit, the non-respect of such time limit does not entail any apparent legal consequences.
Kar zadeva argument v zvezi z rokom treh mesecev, nespoštovanje takšnega roka nima nikakršnih očitnih pravnih posledic.
It should be noted that the MET claims received were deficient and required a number of substantial clarifications and additional information which delayed the investigation.
Treba je poudariti, da so bili prejeti zahtevki za TGO pomanjkljivi in so potrebovali številna bistvena pojasnila in dodatne informacije, ki so upočasnila preiskavo.
The two related Chinese exporting producers were given, on their own request, extensions of the time limits to submit these clarifications and additional information.
Dvema povezanima kitajskima izvoznikoma proizvajalcema se je na njuno zahtevo podaljšal rok za predložitev teh pojasnil in dodatnih informacij.
Furthermore, as they could not receive the verification team at the beginning of October 2004, the verification visits only took place in the second half of that month, thus further delaying the MET determination.
Ker na začetku oktobra 2004 nista mogla sprejeti preveritvene skupine so preveritveni obiski poleg tega potekali šele v drugi polovici tega meseca, kar je še dodatno preložilo odločitev v zvezi z TGO.
It was, therefore, concluded that a valid MET determination could be made or adopted also after the three-month period.
Zato je bil sprejet sklep, da se veljavna odločitev v zvezi z TGO lahko sprejme tudi po obdobju treh mesecev.
The Commission verified all information it considered necessary during the on-the-spot investigation at the premises of the applicant and accepted all information provided by its related companies in order to calculate the export price.
Da bi Komisija izračunala izvozne cene, je med preiskavo na kraju samem v prostorih vlagatelja preverila vse potrebne informacije in sprejela vse informacije, ki so jih zagotovila njegova povezana podjetja.
Therefore, the fact that verification visits were not carried out at the premises of these related companies had no detrimental effect to the applicant.
Zato samo dejstvo, da preveritveni obiski niso bili opravljeni v prostorih teh zadevnih podjetjih, ni škodilo vlagatelju.
Concerning the producer in the analogue country, the findings are set out in recitals 29 to 41.
Ugotovitve v zvezi s proizvajalcem v primerljivi državi so navedene v uvodnih izjavah (29) do (41).
In view of the above findings, it was concluded that the conditions set out in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation were not met by the applicant and, therefore, MET should not be granted.
Glede na navedene ugotovitve je bilo sklenjeno, da vlagatelj ne izpolnjuje pogojev iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, zato se TGO ne more odobriti.
Individual treatment (IT)
Individualna obravnava (IO)
The applicant also claimed IT in the event that it was not granted MET.
Vlagatelj je zahteval tudi IO v primeru, da se mu TGO ne odobri.
On the basis of the information submitted, it was found that the two related Chinese companies met all the requirements for IT as set forth in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi predloženih informacij je bilo ugotovljeno, da dve povezani kitajski podjetji izpolnjujeta vse zahteve za IO, kot so določene v členu 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore concluded that IT should be granted to the applicant.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se vlagatelju IO odobri.
According to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, for non-market economy countries and, to the extent that MET could not be granted, for countries in transition, normal value has to be established on the basis of the price or constructed value in an analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je treba za države brez tržnega gospodarstva in v kolikor se za države v prehodu TGO ne more odobriti, normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi cene ali konstruirane vrednosti v primerljivi državi.
In the Regulation initiating this review, the Commission indicated its intention to use Indonesia as an appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for the PRC and invited interested parties to comment on this.
Komisija je v uredbi o začetku tega pregleda naznanila, da bo uporabila Indonezijo kot primerljivo državo za določitev normalne vrednosti za LRK in povabila zainteresirane stranke, da izrazijo svoja mnenja v zvezi s tem.
Indonesia had already been used as an analogue country in the original investigation.
Indonezija je bila že v prvotni preiskavi uporabljena kot primerljiva država.
No objections were raised by any interested party with regard to this choice.
Nobena zainteresirana stranka ni imela v zvezi s to izbiro nikakršne pripombe.
The Indonesian producer who had cooperated in the original investigation also cooperated in the current review and completed the Commission’s questionnaire.
Indonezijski proizvajalec, ki je sodeloval v prvotni preiskavi, je sodeloval tudi v trenutnem pregledu in je izpolnil vprašalnik Komisije.
It should also be noted that, before a decision on the selection of the most appropriate analogue country was made, questionnaires were also sent to producers in the Republic of Korea, Taiwan and Japan, but these producers did not cooperate.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da je Komisija pred odločitvijo o izbiri najprimernejše primerljive države, poslala vprašalnike tudi proizvajalcem v Republiki Koreji, Tajvanu in na Japonskem, vendar ti proizvajalci niso sodelovali.
In view of the above, and in particular the fact that Indonesia was used as the analogue country in the original investigation, and that there are no indications that the suitability of Indonesia as analogue country would have changed, it is concluded that Indonesia constitutes an appropriate analogue country in accordance with Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na navedeno in še posebej glede na dejstvo, da je bila Indonezija v prvotni preiskavi uporabljena kot primerljiva država in da nič ne kaže, da bi se ustreznost Indonezije kot primerljive države lahko spremenila, je bilo sklenjeno, da je Indonezija ustrezna primerljiva država v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe.
The applicant considered as a discriminatory change of methodology between the original investigation and this review the fact that no verification visit was carried out at the premises of the Indonesian producer during the review, while such visit was carried out during the original investigation.
Vlagatelj je štel dejstvo, da med pregledom ni bil opravljen noben preveritveni obisk pri indonezijskem proizvajalcu, medtem ko je bil tak obisk opravljen med prvotno preiskavo, za diskriminatorno spremembo metodologije med prvotno preiskavo in tem pregledom.
Furthermore, the applicant considered discriminatory the use of non-verified facts for the calculation of normal value for a non-market economy exporting producer, while this does not happen in ‘new exporter’ reviews concerning exporting producers in market economy countries.
Poleg tega je vlagatelj menil, da je diskriminatorno uporabljati nepreverjena dejstva za izračun normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike iz netržnega gospodarstva, medtem ko se to ne zgodi v pregledih zaradi novega izvoznika v zvezi z proizvajalci izvozniki v državah s tržnim gospodarstvom.
The applicant, based on information in the non-confidential file, argued that the reply to the questionnaire of the Indonesian producer was apparently inadequate and there was only information to make a rough calculation of constructed normal value.
Vlagatelj je na podlagi informacij iz dokumentacije, ki ni zaupne narave, trdil, da izpolnjen vprašalnik indonezijskega proizvajalca očitno ni bil ustrezen in da so obstajale le informacije za približni izračun konstruirane normalne vrednosti.
In accordance with Article 16 of the basic Regulation, verification visits are not mandatory.
V skladu s členom 16 osnovne uredbe preveritveni obiski niso obvezni.
Therefore, not to carry out a verification visit cannot be considered discriminatory.
Zato se dejstvo, da preveritveni obisk ni bil opravljen, ne more šteti za diskriminatorno.
Furthermore, the fact that a verification visit was not carried out at the premises of the Indonesian producer during the review does not mean that the information provided has not been carefully analysed.
Poleg tega dejstvo, da preveritveni obisk med pregledom ni bil opravljen pri indonezijskem proizvajalcu, ne pomeni, da posredovane informacije niso bile temeljito analizirane.
The information provided by the Indonesian producer was consistent with that provided in the original investigation, which had been verified on the spot, and with the documentary evidence supplied in the reply to the questionnaire.
Informacije, ki jih je posredoval indonezijski proizvajalec, so bile skladne s tistimi iz prvotne preiskave, ki so bile preverjene na kraju samem in skupaj z dokazno dokumentacijo predložene skupaj z izpolnjenim vprašalnikom.
This information was sufficient to perform a detailed calculation of constructed normal value as set out below.
Te informacije so bile zadostne za podroben izračun konstruirane normalne vrednosti, kot je določena spodaj.
The fact that the applicant could not identify in the non-confidential file all confidential details of the information provided by the Indonesian producer does not render such information inadequate to calculate normal value.
Dejstvo, da vlagatelj v dokumentaciji nezaupne narave ni mogel prepoznati vseh zaupnih podrobnosti informacij, ki jih je posredoval indonezijski proizvajalec, še ne pomeni, da so le-te neustrezne za izračun normalne vrednosti.
Finally, the applicant has not claimed that the non-confidential file did not contain summaries in sufficient detail to permit a reasonable understanding of the information submitted in confidence.
Nazadnje vlagatelj ni trdil, da dokumentacija nezaupne narave ne vsebuje dovolj podrobnih povzetkov, da se omogoči primerno razumevanje informacij, ki so bile zaupno predložene.
In view of the above, the comments of the applicant on verification visit and inadequate information had to be rejected.
Glede na navedeno je bilo treba pripombe vlagatelja v zvezi s preveritvenim obiskom in neustreznimi informacijami zavrniti.
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, normal value for the two related Chinese exporting producers was established on the basis of the information received from the producer in the analogue country.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe je bila normalna vrednost za dva povezana kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika določena na podlagi informacij proizvajalca iz primerljive države.
Although the production and export sales of this producer were significant, its sales to unrelated customers on the Indonesian market were considered not to be made in sufficient quantities.
Čeprav sta bili proizvodnja in izvozna prodaja tega proizvajalca obsežni, pa njegova prodaja nepovezanim strankam na indonezijskem trgu ni bila izvedena v zadostnih količinah.
Therefore, normal value had to be determined on the basis of the constructed value for product types comparable to those exported to the Community by the applicant, i.e. on the basis of the cost of production of the REWS manufactured in Indonesia plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative (SGA) expenses and for profits.
Zato je bilo treba normalno vrednost določiti na podlagi konstruirane vrednosti za vrste izdelka, primerljive s tistimi, ki jih vlagatelj izvaža v Skupnost, tj. na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov REWS, proizvedenih v Indoneziji, in razumnega zneska za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA stroški) ter za dobiček.
The SGA expenses used were those incurred by the Indonesian manufacturer as well as by one related company involved in its domestic sales.
Uporabljeni PSA stroški so bili tisti, ki sta jih imela indonezijski proizvajalec in povezano podjetje, ki je bilo vključeno v njegovo domačo prodajo.
For the calculation of the profit margin, in the absence of sufficient quantities sold by the Indonesian producer to unrelated customers on its domestic market, it was necessary to use information from the original investigation.
Zaradi nezadostnih količin, ki jih je indonezijski proizvajalec na svojem domačem trgu prodal nepovezanim strankam, je bilo potrebno za izračun stopnje dobička uporabiti informacije iz prvotne preiskave.
It was decided to take the profit margin used to construct normal value in the original investigation concerning imports of REWS from Taiwan.
Sklenjeno je bilo, da se uporabi stopnja dobička, ki je bila uporabljena za konstruiranje normalne vrednosti v prvotni preiskavi v zvezi z uvozom REWS iz Tajvana.
This margin was considered reasonable in the absence of any other information on the profitability of the like product sold in Indonesia.
Ta stopnja se je štela za primerno glede na pomanjkanje kakršnih koli drugih informacij o dobičkonosnosti podobnega izdelka, ki se je prodajal v Indoneziji.
It should also be noted that the REWS sold by the Taiwanese exporting producers on the Taiwanese domestic market were all low-range REWS, which is also the case of the REWS manufactured by the producer in the analogue country.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da so bile REWS, ki so jih prodajali tajvanski proizvajalci izvozniki na tajvanskem domačem trgu, nižjega razreda, kar velja tudi za REWS, ki jih je proizvajal proizvajalec v primerljivi državi.
The applicant argued that, in accordance with Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation, the same methodology as in the original investigation should have been applied in determining normal value, i.e. selling prices.
Vlagatelj je trdil, da bi bilo treba za določitev normalne vrednosti, tj. prodajnih cen, v skladu s členom 11(9) osnovne uredbe, uporabiti enako metodologijo kot v prvotni preiskavi.
It also argued that there is no indication that the SGA of the related company was included in the original investigation, as there is no reference to this issue in the original Regulation.
Prav tako je trdil, da ni nobenega znaka, da so bili PSA stroški vključeni v prvotno preiskavo, ker tega vprašanja prvotna uredba ni obravnavala.
It would thus appear that the methodology used in the original investigation was changed to the detriment of the applicant.
Tako izgleda, da se je metodologija, ki je bila uporabljena v prvotni preiskavi, spremenila na škodo vlagatelja.
Furthermore, it merely argued that it was unusual to choose the profitability in the original IP of a market other than that of the analogue country.
Poleg tega je še trdil, da je bila v prvotnem OP izbira dobičkonosnosti drugega trga kot tistega iz primerljive države nenavadna.
With regard to these arguments, as set out in recital 37 above, constructed normal value with the profit on domestic sales during the original investigation in Taiwan was used because the domestic sales in the Indonesian market during the investigation period were considered insufficient for establishing normal value on the basis of sales prices.
Glede na argumente, navedene v uvodni izjavi (37), je bila uporabljena normalna vrednost, konstruirana na podlagi dobička domače prodaje med prvotno preiskavo v Tajvanu, ker je bila domača prodaja na indonezijskem trgu med obdobjem preiskave nezadostna za določitev normalne vrednosti na podlagi prodajnih cen.
This was not the case during the original investigation where sales prices and not constructed value were used.
Temu ni bilo tako med prvotno preiskavo, kjer so bile uporabljene prodajne cene in ne konstruirane vrednosti.
This is the reason why the original Regulation did not contain any details about SGA expenses.
To je razlog, da prvotna uredba ni vsebovala nobenih podrobnosti v zvezi s PSA stroški.
Furthermore, it should be noted that if the prices of the few sales of REWS on the Indonesian market had been used, the normal value thus established would have been higher.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da bi bila določena normalna vrednost višja, če bi se uporabile cene prodaje REWS na indonezijskem trgu.
The same would have happened if in constructing normal value the profit margin from these few domestic sales in Indonesia had been used.
Do tega bi prišlo tudi, če bi se v konstruirani normalni vrednosti uporabila stopnja dobička iz te prodaje v Indoneziji.
It is, therefore, incorrect to argue that the methodology changed to the detriment of the applicant.
Zato ni pravilno trditi, da se je metodologija spremenila na škodo vlagatelja.
The two related Chinese exporting producers sold their REWS to the Community through related companies (traders) registered in Samoa and Taiwan.
Dva povezana kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika ste preko povezanih podjetij (trgovcev), registriranih na Samoi in Tajvanu, prodajala REWS v Skupnosti.
The export price was established on the basis of the resale prices paid or payable by the first independent buyer in the Community.
Izvozna cena je bila določena na podlagi cen pri nadaljnji prodaji, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani prvega neodvisnega kupca v Skupnosti.
The comparison between the normal value and the export price was made on an ex-factory basis and at the same level of trade.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti z izvozno ceno je bila narejena na podlagi cene franko tovarna in na enaki ravni trgovine.
In order to ensure a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Zaradi poštene primerjave so se v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevale razlike v dejavnikih, za katere se je pokazalo, da so vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, allowances for differences in physical characteristics, transport costs, handling costs and commissions were made where applicable.
V skladu s tem so bila izplačana nadomestila za razlike v fizičnih značilnostih, transportnih stroških, stroških nakladanja in provizij.
An adjustment was made to the normal value to exclude the value of any printer interface.
Izvedena je bila prilagoditev normalne vrednosti, da se izključi kakršen koli vmesnik za tiskalnik.
Furthermore, as some of the models sold by the two related Chinese exporting producers through their related sales companies to the Community had a pole, an adjustment to the normal value was made to take into account the value of the pole.
Ker so nekateri modeli, ki sta jih preko svojih povezanih prodajnih podjetij prodajala dva povezana kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, imela magnetno os, je bila normalna vrednost prilagojena, da se je upoštevala vrednost magnetne osi.
As the related traders of the Chinese exporting producers have functions similar to those of an agent working on a commission basis, an adjustment to the export price for a commission was made in accordance with Article 2(10)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Ker imajo povezani trgovci kitajskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov podobne funkcije kot zastopnik, ki dela na podlagi provizij, so bile provizije za izvozno ceno prilagojene v skladu s členom 2(10)(i) osnovne uredbe.
The level of the commission was calculated based on direct evidence pointing to the existence of such functions.
Stopnja provizije je bila izračunana na podlagi neposrednih dokazov, ki so kazali na obstoj takšnih funkcij.
In this context, in the calculation of the commission, the SGA expenses incurred by the related traders to sell the product concerned produced by the two related Chinese producers were taken into account.
V okviru izračuna provizije so se upoštevali PSA stroški, ki so nastali povezanim trgovcem pri prodaji zadevnega izdelka, ki ga proizvajata dva povezana kitajska proizvajalca.
The applicant argued that the model sold in the analogue country had higher specifications which affected the price comparability.
Vlagatelj je trdil, da je imel model, prodajan v primerljivi državi, zahtevnejše specifikacije, kar je vplivalo na primerljivost cen.
As the applicant did not provide a single example of the alleged higher specifications and their alleged impact on the price comparability, this claim could not be accepted.
Ker vlagatelj ni zagotovil niti enega primera domnevno bolj zahtevnih specifikacij in domnevnega vpliva na primerljivost cen, te trditve ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.