natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decision 1999/468/EC is hereby amended as follows:
Sklep 1999/468/ES se spremeni, kakor sledi:
at the end of recital 5, the following shall be added: ‘with the exception of those governing the regulatory procedure with scrutiny’;
Na koncu uvodne izjave (5) se dodajo naslednje besede: „razen v primeru tistih, ki urejajo regulativni postopek s pregledom“.
after recital (7), the following recital shall be inserted:
Za uvodno izjavo (7) se vstavi naslednja uvodna izjava:
It is necessary to follow the regulatory procedure with scrutiny as regards measures of general scope which seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new nonessential elements.
Regulativni postopek s pregledom je treba uporabiti v primeru ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb akta, sprejetega v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb.
This procedure should enable the two arms of the legislative authority to scrutinise such measures before they are adopted.
Ta postopek mora obema vejama zakonodajne oblasti omogočiti pregled teh ukrepov še pred njihovim sprejetjem.
The essential elements of a legislative act may only be amended by the legislator on the basis of the Treaty;’;
Bistvene določbe zakonodajnega akta lahko spremeni samo zakonodajalec na podlagi Pogodbe.“
recital (10) shall be replaced by the following:
Uvodna izjava (10) se nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom:
The third purpose of this Decision is to improve information to the European Parliament by providing that the Commission should inform it on a regular basis of committee proceedings, that the Commission should transmit to it documents related to activities of committees and inform it whenever the Commission transmits to the Council measures or proposals for measures to be taken; particular attention will be paid to the provision of information to the European Parliament on the proceedings of committees in the framework of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, so as to ensure that the European Parliament takes a decision within the stipulated deadline.’;
Tretji cilj tega sklepa je izboljšati obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta in v ta namen se določi, da ga mora Komisija redno obveščati o postopkih v odborih, mu posredovati dokumente, ki se nanašajo na dejavnosti odborov, in ga obvestiti, kadar Svetu predloži ukrepe ali osnutke ukrepov, ki bi jih bilo potrebno sprejeti; posebno pozornost je treba nameniti obveščanju Evropskega parlamenta o delu odborov v okviru regulativnega postopka s pregledom in tako zagotoviti, da bo lahko Evropski parlament odločitve sprejemal v predvidenem roku.“
in Article 1: ‘5a’ shall be inserted between ‘5’ and ‘and 6’ in the last line;
V členu 1 se v zadnji vrstici med „5“ in „6“ vstavi „5a“.
in Article 2:
V členu 2 se:
in the first paragraph the words ‘1.
besedilo prvega odstavka nadomesti z naslednjim besedilom: „1.
Without prejudice to paragraph 2,’ shall be inserted at the beginning of the text;
Brez poseganja v odstavek 2, je pri izbiri postopkov za sprejem izvedbenih ukrepov treba upoštevati naslednja merila:“;
the following paragraph shall be added:
doda naslednji odstavek:
Where a basic instrument, adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, provides for the adoption of measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of that instrument, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements, those measures shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.’;
Če je v temeljnem aktu, sprejetem po postopku iz člena 251 Pogodbe, predvideno sprejetje ukrepov splošnega obsega za spreminjanje nebistvenih določb tega akta, vključno s črtanjem nekaterih takšnih določb ali z dodajanjem novih nebistvenih določb, se takšni ukrepi sprejmejo po regulativnem postopku s pregledom.“
in Article 4(2) and Article 5(2), the terms ‘and (4)’ shall be added after ‘Article 205(2)’;
V členih 4(2) in 5(2) se za besedo „205(2)“ dodajo besede „in (4)“.
after Article 5, the following Article shall be inserted:
Za členom 5 se vstavi naslednji člen:
Regulatory procedure with scrutiny
Regulativni postopek s pregledom
The Commission shall be assisted by a Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny Committee composed of the representatives of the Member States and chaired by the representative of the Commission.
Komisiji pomaga odbor za regulativni postopek s pregledom, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, predseduje pa mu predstavnik Komisije.
The representative of the Commission shall submit to the Committee a draft of the measures to be taken.
Predstavnik Komisije predloži odboru osnutek potrebnih ukrepov.
The Committee shall deliver its opinion on the draft within a time-limit which the chairman may lay down according to the urgency of the matter.
Odbor poda mnenje o njem v roku, ki ga lahko določi predsednik glede na nujnost zadeve.
The opinion shall be delivered by the majority laid down in Article 205(2) and (4) of the Treaty in the case of decisions which the Council is required to adopt on a proposal from the Commission.
Odbor poda mnenje z večino, določeno v členu 205(2) in (4) Pogodbe, ki se uporablja za sprejemanje odločitev Sveta na predlog Komisije.
The votes of the representatives of the Member States within the Committee shall be weighted in the manner set out in that Article.
Glasovi predstavnikov držav članic v odboru se ponderirajo na način iz navedenega člena.
The chairman shall not vote.
Predsednik ne glasuje.
If the measures envisaged by the Commission are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, the following procedure shall apply:
Če so ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, skladni z mnenjem odbora, se uporabi naslednji postopek:
the Commission shall without delay submit the draft measures for scrutiny by the European Parliament and the Council;
Komisija nemudoma predloži osnutek ukrepov Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu v pregled.
the European Parliament, acting by a majority of its component members, or the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may oppose the adoption of the said draft by the Commission, justifying their opposition by indicating that the draft measures proposed by the Commission exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or that the draft is not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality;
Evropski parlament z večino svojih članov ali Svet s kvalificirano večino lahko nasprotujeta sprejetju navedenega osnutka Komisije in v svoji odločitvi navedeta, da osnutek ukrepov, ki ga je predložila Komisija, presega izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, da ta osnutek ni skladen s ciljem ali z vsebino temeljnega akta ali da v njem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti.
if, within three months from the date of referral to them, the European Parliament or the Council opposes the draft measures, the latter shall not be adopted by the Commission.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotujeta osnutku ukrepov v roku treh mesecev od njihove predložitve, jih Komisija ne sprejme.
In that event, the Commission may submit to the Committee an amended draft of the measures or present a legislative proposal on the basis of the Treaty;
V tem primeru lahko Komisija odboru predloži spremenjeni osnutek ukrepov ali zakonodajni predlog na podlagi Pogodbe.
if, on expiry of that period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has opposed the draft measures, the latter shall be adopted by the Commission.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet po izteku tega roka ne nasprotujeta osnutku ukrepov, jih Komisija sprejme.
If the measures envisaged by the Commission are not in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, or if no opinion is delivered, the following procedure shall apply:
Če ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, niso skladni z mnenjem odbora, ali če mnenja ni, se uporabi naslednji postopek:
the Commission shall without delay submit a proposal relating to the measures to be taken to the Council and shall forward it to the European Parliament at the same time;
Komisija nemudoma predloži predlog v zvezi s potrebnimi ukrepi Svetu in hkrati tudi Evropskemu parlamentu.
the Council shall act on the proposal by a qualified majority within two months from the date of referral to it;
Svet o tem predlogu odloča s kvalificirano večino v roku dveh mesecev od njegove predložitve.
if, within that period, the Council opposes the proposed measures by a qualified majority, the measures shall not be adopted.
Če Svet v tem roku s kvalificirano večino nasprotuje predlaganim ukrepom, se slednji ne sprejmejo.
In that event, the Commission may submit to the Council an amended proposal or present a legislative proposal on the basis of the Treaty;
V tem primeru lahko Komisija Svetu predloži spremenjeni predlog ali zakonodajni predlog na podlagi Pogodbe.
if the Council envisages adopting the proposed measures, it shall without delay submit them to the European Parliament.
Če namerava Svet sprejeti predlagane ukrepe, te nemudoma predloži Evropskemu parlamentu.
If the Council does not act within the two-month period, the Commission shall without delay submit the measures for scrutiny by the European Parliament;
Če Svet ne odloči v roku dveh mesecev, Komisija ukrepe nemudoma predloži v Evropskemu parlamentu.
the European Parliament, acting by a majority of its component members within four months from the forwarding of the proposal in accordance with point (a), may oppose the adoption of the measures in question, justifying their opposition by indicating that the proposed measures exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or are not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or do not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality;
Evropski parlament lahko v roku štirih mesecev od predložitve predloga v skladu s točko (a) z večino svojih članov nasprotuje sprejetju navedenih ukrepov in v svoji odločitvi navede, da predlagani ukrepi presegajo izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, da ti ukrepi niso skladni s ciljem ali z vsebino temeljnega akta ali da v njem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti.
if, within that period, the European Parliament opposes the proposed measures, the latter shall not be adopted.
Če Evropski parlament v tem roku nasprotuje predlaganim ukrepom, se slednji ne sprejmejo.
if, on expiry of that period, the European Parliament has not opposed the proposed measures, the latter shall be adopted by the Council or by the Commission, as the case may be.
Če Evropski parlament po izteku navedenega roka ne nasprotuje predlaganim ukrepom, jih lahko sprejmeta, odvisno od primera, Svet ali Komisija.
By way of derogation from paragraphs 3 and 4, a basic instrument may in duly substantiated exceptional cases provide:
Z odstopanjem od odstavkov 3 in 4 lahko temeljni akt v izjemnih, ustrezno utemeljenih primerih predvidi:
that the time-limits laid down in paragraphs 3(c), 4(b) and 4(e) shall be extended by an additional month, when justified by the complexity of the measures; or
podaljšanje rokov iz odstavkov 3(c), 4(b) in 4(e) tega člena za dodaten mesec, če je to upravičeno zaradi kompleksnosti ukrepov, ali
that the time-limits laid down in paragraphs 3(c), 4(b) and 4(e) shall be curtailed where justified on the grounds of efficiency.
skrajšanje rokov iz odstavkov 3(c), 4(b) in 4(e) tega člena, če je to potrebno zaradi večje učinkovitosti.
A basic instrument may provide that if, on imperative grounds of urgency, the timelimits for the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 cannot be complied with, the following procedure shall apply:
V temeljnem aktu je lahko predvideno, da se v nujnih primerih, ko ni mogoče upoštevati rokov za regulativni postopek s pregledom iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5, uporabi naslednji postopek:
if the measures envisaged by the Commission are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee, the Commission shall adopt the measures, which shall immediately be implemented.
Če so ukrepi, ki jih načrtuje Komisija, skladni z mnenjem odbora, jih Komisija sprejme in se ti začnejo nemudoma izvajati.
The Commission shall without delay communicate them to the European Parliament and to the Council;
O ukrepih takoj obvesti Evropski parlament in Svet.
within a time-limit of one month following that communication, the European Parliament, acting by a majority of its component members, or the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may oppose the measures adopted by the Commission, on the grounds that the measures exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or are not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or do not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality;
Evropski parlament z večino svojih članov ali Svet s kvalificirano večino lahko v roku meseca dni po prejemu tega sporočila nasprotujeta ukrepom, ki jih je sprejela Komisija, in v svoji odločitvi navedeta, da presegajo izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, da ta osnutek ni skladen s ciljem ali z vsebino temeljnega akta ali da v njem nista upoštevani načeli subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti.
in the event of opposition by the European Parliament or the Council, the Commission shall repeal the measures.
V primeru nasprotovanja Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta, Komisija ukrepe razveljavi.
It may however provisionally maintain the measures in force if warranted on health protection, safety or environmental grounds.
Vendar se lahko ukrepi začasno ohranijo, če so utemeljeni z varovanjem zdravja, varnostjo ali varstvom okolja.
In that event, it shall without delay submit to the Committee an amended draft of the measures or a legislative proposal on the basis of the Treaty.
V tem primeru Komisija odboru nemudoma predloži spremenjeni osnutek ukrepov ali zakonodajni predlog na podlagi Pogodbe.
The provisional measures shall remain in force until they are replaced by a definitive instrument.’.
Začasni ukrepi ostanejo veljavni, dokler jih ne nadomesti dokončni akt.“
In Article 7(3) at the end of the first sentence, the following shall be added:
Na koncu prvega stavka člena 7(3) se vstavi:
‘following arrangements which ensure that the transmission system is transparent and that the information forwarded and the various stages of the procedure are identified.’.
„na način, ki zagotavlja preglednost sistema posredovanja ter identifikacijo posredovanih informacij in posameznih faz postopka“.
Done at Brussels, 17 July 2006.
V Bruslju, 17. julija 2006
OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.
UL L 184 z dne 17.7.1999, str. 23.
on the State Aid which the Federal Republic of Germany has implemented for the introduction of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg
o državni pomoči Zvezne republike Nemčije za uvedbo digitalne prizemne televizije (DVB-T) v Berlin-Brandenburgu
(notified under document number C(2005) 3903)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 3903)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 88(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1],
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By fax of 16 December 2002, the Association of Private Cable Network Operators (Verband Privater Kabelnetzbetreiber e.V., hereinafter ‘ANGA’) filed a complaint concerning the financing of digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) in Berlin-Brandenburg [2].
S telefaksom z dne 16. decembra 2002 je Zveza zasebnih operaterjev kabelskega omrežja (Verband Privater Kabelnetzbetreiber e.V., v nadaljevanju ANGA) vložila neuradno pritožbo glede financiranja digitalne prizemne televizije (DVB-T) v Berlin-Brandenburgu [2].
By letter of 26 March 2003, it urged the Commission to initiate the procedure and to suspend the granting of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 26. marca 2003 je ANGA Komisijo pozvala, naj sproži formalni postopek preiskave in ustavi dodelitev pomoči.
By letter of 2 May 2003, the Commission submitted a request for information from Germany. The information was provided on 30 June 2003 following an extension of the deadline.
Z dopisom z dne 2. maja 2003 je Komisija Nemčijo pozvala, naj predloži informacije, ki so bile po podaljšanju roka posredovane dne 30. junija 2003.
On 1 October 2003 a meeting took place between the Commission departments and the alleged provider of the aid, the Media Authority for Berlin-Brandenburg (Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg,‘Mabb’).
oktobra 2003 so se sestale službe Komisije in domnevni dajalec pomoči, medijska institucija Berlin-Brandenburg (v nadaljevanju Mabb).
Mabb supplied further information on 23 October 2003 and 4 February 2004.
oktobra 2003 in 4. februarja 2004 je Mabb predložil dodatne informacije.
By letter of 23 December 2003, Kabel Baden-Württemberg GmbH & Co. KG (‘Kabel BW’) announced that it too would be submitting a complaint regarding the financing of DVB-T in Berlin-Brandenburg.
Z dopisom z dne 23. decembra 2003 je Kabel Baden-Württemberg GmbH & Co. KG (v nadaljevanju Kabel BW) napovedal, da namerava vložiti pritožbo glede financiranja DVB-T v Berlin-Brandenburgu.
The complaint was submitted on 8 March 2004.
To se je zgodilo 8. marca 2004.
However, the Commission decided that this complaint would not be examined as part of the present formal investigation procedure.
Vendar se je Komisija odločila, da te pritožbe ne bo preiskala v okviru obravnavanega formalnega postopka preiskave.
Since the complaint deals with the prices set by public service broadcasters (PSBs) for rental of their terrestrial broadcasting capacities to commercial service broadcasters (CSBs), it was included in the general investigation into the financing of PSBs in Germany [3].
Ker je predmet pritožbe določitev cen s strani javnopravnih televizijskih ustanov pri oddajanju v najem prizemnih kapacitet radiodifuzije zasebnim televizijskim postajam, je bila pritožba vključena v splošno preiskavo financiranja javnopravnih televizijskih ustanov v Nemčiji [3].
By letter of 14 July 2004, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the measure at issue (‘decision to initiate the procedure’).
Z dopisom z dne 14. julija 2004 je Komisija Nemčijo obvestila o tem, da bo zaradi obravnavanega ukrepa sprožila formalni postopek preiskave po členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES (v nadaljevanju odločba o sprožitvi postopka).
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 28 August 2004 [4].
Odločitev Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije dne 28. avgusta 2004 [4].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe k zadevnemu ukrepu.
Following the extension of the deadline, Germany responded by letter of 4 October 2004 to the request for comments in the decision to initiate the procedure.
Nemčija je pripombe k odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka predložila po podaljšanju roka z dopisom z dne 4. oktobra 2004.
The Commission also received comments from the following interested parties: Nordic Satellite AB (‘NSAB’) [5], ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG (‘ProSiebenSat.1’) and the European Cable Communications Association (‘ECCA’) and Deutsche Telekom AG (‘DTAG’) [6], and the European Satellite Operators Association (‘ESOA’) [7].
Komisija je prejela pripombe naslednjih zainteresiranih strank: Nordic Satellite AB (v nadaljevanju NSAB) [5], ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG (v nadaljevanju ProSiebenSat.1), Evropskega združenja kabelskih operaterjev (v nadaljevanju ECCA), Deutsche Telekom AG (v nadaljevanju DTAG) [6], in Evropske zveze satelitskih operaterjev (v nadaljevanju ESOA) [7].
By letter of 17 November 2004, the Commission forwarded those observations to Germany, which commented on them by letter of 16 December 2004.
Komisija je te pripombe z dopisom z dne 17. novembra 2004 posredovala Nemčiji, ki je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 16. decembra 2004.
The Commission received further information from Mabb [8], from Deutscher Kabelverband [9], from ANGA [10], from DTAG [11] and from European Economic & Marketing Consultants GmbH (‘EE&MC’), acting on behalf of Kabel BW [12].
Dodatne informacije so Komisiji poslali Mabb [8], Deutscher Kabelverband [9], ANGA [10], DTAG [11], in v imenu Kabel BW European Economic & Marketing Consultants GmbH (v nadaljevanju EE&MC) [12].
In addition, the Commission Departments met with ECCA, Mabb, EE&MC and DTAG [13].
Poleg tega so se službe Komisije 22. novembra 2004 sestale z ECCA, z Mabbom 2. marca 2005, z EE&MC 12. aprila 2005 in z DTAG 28. aprila 2005 [13].
The Commission notified Germany of this information by letters of 14 June and 14 July 2005, to which it replied by letter of 15 August 2005.
Komisija je z dopisoma z dne 14. junija 2005 in 14. julija 2005 te pripombe sporočila Nemčiji, ki je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 15. avgusta 2005.
The present procedure is to be viewed against the background of the digitisation of broadcasting, which is affecting all the currently commonly available transmission platforms, i.e. cable, satellite and terrestrial.
Na zadevni postopek je potrebno gledati v luči digitalizacije radiodifuzije. Digitalizacija zadeva vse aktualne prenosne platforme za radiodifuzijo, tj. kabelsko, satelitsko in prizemno difuzijo.
The aid in question is for terrestrial transmission, which, in analogue mode, can normally accommodate fewer than 10 television channels.
Zadevna pomoč zadeva prizemni prenos. Po prizemni prenosni poti je v analognem načinu praviloma mogoče prenesti manj kot deset televizijskih programov.
In Berlin, however, the special circumstances that existed before the Wall came down meant that up to 13 channels could be broadcast terrestrially in analogue mode.
V Berlinu pa je bilo pred padcem Berlinskega zidu zaradi posebnega položaja v analognem načinu mogoče po prizemni prenosni poti prenesti do 13 programov.
After digitisation, some 30 channels will be able to be broadcast terrestrially.
Po digitalizaciji bo mogoče prizemno prenesti okoli 30 programov.
Since the emergence of cable and satellite in the 1980s, the use of terrestrial broadcasting has fallen sharply in Germany.
Po uvedbi kabla in satelita v 80. letih je uporaba prizemne televizijske difuzije v Nemčiji močno upadla.
According to data collected by AGF/GfK, the household reception figures for primary television sets in Germany were on 1 January 2005: 5,2 % terrestrial, 55,9 % cable and 38,9 % satellite [14].
Po podatkih AGF/GfK je bil 1. januarja 2005 sprejem gospodinjstev za primarne televizijske aparate v vsej Nemčiji naslednji: 5,2 % prizemna distribucija, 55,9 % kabelska distribucija in 38,9 % satelitska distribucija [14].
According to data by ASTRA/Infratest, the share of terrestrial households in Germany was even lower, that is 3,8 % (end of 2004) [15].
Po podatkih ASTRA/Infratest je bil delež gospodinjstev s prizemno distribucijo v Nemčiji še manjši, in sicer 3,8 % (ob koncu leta 2004) [15].
For Berlin-Brandenburg, ASTRA/Infratest gives the following breakdown of household TV reception (end of 2004): 2,8 % terrestrial, 67,5 % cable and 29,7 % satellite.
Za Berlin-Brandenburg ASTRA/Infratest podaja naslednjo razdelitev televizijskega sprejema gospodinjstev (ob koncu leta 2004): 2,8 % prizemna distribucija, 67,5 % kabelska distribucija in 29,7 % satelitska distribucija.