natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This claim is based on the allegation that importers usually apply their mark-up to the landed import price, including any duties, and thus they would therefore apply a margin also on the anti-dumping duties, amongst other elements.
To temelji na trditvi, da uvozniki običajno dodajo svoj pribitek na uvozno ceno za iztovorjeno blago, vključno z vsemi dajatvami, in naj bi zato dodali maržo med drugim tudi na protidampinške dajatve.
On the other hand, certain importers have however claimed that they would not be in a position to pass on any duties to consumers, on the grounds that it is the consumers that set the level of prices, and that consumers would therefore not purchase certain footwear if it would exceed a given price.
Na drugi strani pa so nekateri uvozniki trdili, da na potrošnike ne bi mogli prenesti nobenih dajatev, saj so potrošniki tisti, ki določajo raven cen, in zato potrošniki določene obutve ne bi kupili, če bi njena cena presegla dano ceno.
First of all, exporting producers do not have standing on Community interest under current rules.
Prvič, proizvajalci izvozniki po sedanjih pravilih nimajo pravice do pripomb glede interesa Skupnosti.
Their points have nevertheless been analysed for the sake of argument.
Vseeno pa so bile zaradi utemeljitve njihove pripombe analizirane.
It should be underlined that those parties that did not agree with the Commission's findings concerning the impact of the measures on consumers, did however not submit any specific data or information that could support their claims.
Treba je poudariti, da stranke, ki se niso strinjale z ugotovitvami Komisije v zvezi z vplivom ukrepov na potrošnika, pravzaprav niso predložile nobenih posebnih podatkov ali informacij v podporo svojim trditvam.
Instead, as reported above, they even provided contradictory statements claiming that duties would be either fully passed on to consumers (and even more by applying mark-ups also on the duty) or that it would not be possible at all to pass on any effect of duties.
Namesto tega, kot je navedeno zgoraj, so stranke predložile celo protislovne izjave, da se bodo dajatve v celoti prenesle na potrošnike (in to še bolj z dajanjem pribitkov tudi na dajatve) ali pa sploh ne bo mogoče prenesti nobenega učinka dajatev.
Their claims were therefore not considered sufficient to alter the provisional findings.
Njihove trditve se zato niso zdele zadostne za spremembo začasnih ugotovitev.
In addition certain exporting producers claimed that the imposition of measures would significantly limit consumers' choice.
Poleg tega so nekateri proizvajalci izvozniki trdili, da bi uvedba ukrepov potrošnikom bistveno omejila izbiro.
This is based on the allegation that certain types of leather footwear are only produced in China and Vietnam, that anti-dumping duties would allegedly result in a decision not to produce certain types of footwear and that the Community producers would not have the capacity to supply the Community market with those types.
To temelji na trditvi, da se nekatere vrste usnjene obutve proizvajajo samo na Kitajskem in v Vietnamu, da bodo protidampinške dajatve domnevno vplivale na odločitev o neproizvajanju nekaterih vrst obutve in da proizvajalci Skupnosti ne bodo sposobni dobavljati navedenih vrst obutve na trg Skupnosti.
These allegations of a reduced choice of footwear were already made earlier and addressed in the recital 246 of the provisional Regulation.
Te trditve o manjši izbiri obutve so bile izražene že prej in obravnavane v uvodni izjavi 246 začasne uredbe.
In addition, the claim that certain types of footwear would no longer be produced and that the Community producers would not have enough capacity to substitute the alleged shortages is a simple allegation that was not supported by any objective facts or evidence, and was therefore rejected.
Poleg tega je trditev, da se nekaterih vrst obutve ne bo več proizvajalo in da proizvajalci Skupnosti ne bodo sposobni nadomestiti domnevnega pomanjkanja, enostavna domneva, ki ni bila podprta z nobenimi objektivnimi dejstvi ali dokazi in je bila zato zavrnjena.
Finally, the exclusion of children's footwear was reconsidered given the arguments given by the Community industry.
Nazadnje se je ponovno obravnavala izključitev otroške obutve glede na utemeljitve industrije Skupnosti.
Even though this exclusion was generally welcomed by exporting producers and importers, in the absence of reaction from any consumer organisation, no further evidence or confirmation was received showing that the effect of imposing measures on children's footwear would be different than the effect it would have on adult footwear.
Čeprav so to izključitev proizvajalci izvozniki in uvozniki, ob odsotnosti odziva katere koli potrošniške organizacije, na splošno pozdravili, ni bil predložen noben nadaljnji dokaz ali potrditev o tem, da bo učinek uvedbe ukrepov na otroško obutev drugačen od učinka, ki bi ga ta uvedba imela na obutev za odrasle.
The Community industry, on the other side, challenged the exclusion of children's shoes from the scope of provisional anti-dumping measures and referred to the fact that there has been production of children's footwear in the Community and that injurious dumping has been established for children's footwear.
Na drugi strani je industrija Skupnosti izpodbijala izključitev otroških čevljev iz obsega začasnih protidampinških ukrepov in se sklicevala na dejstvo, da se v Skupnosti proizvaja otroška obutev in da je bil za otroško obutev ugotovljen škodljivi damping.
The definitive findings with regard to the status of children's shoes in the present proceeding lead to the following conclusion.
Na podlagi dokončnih ugotovitev v zvezi s statusom otroških čevljev v tem postopku se sklene naslednje.
Firstly, further analysis that lead to the definitive findings demonstrated that children's footwear should be included in the definition of the product concerned, i.e. that all types of the product concerned should be regarded as forming one single product, and that therefore in principle anti-dumping measures should apply to the totality of the product concerned.
Prvič, nadaljnja analiza, ki je vodila v dokončne ugotovitve, je pokazala, da je treba otroško obutev vključiti v opredelitev zadevnega izdelka, tj. da je treba vse vrste izdelka šteti za en sam izdelek in da je treba zato protidampinške ukrepe načeloma uporabljati za celoten zadevni izdelek.
Secondly, the arguments to provisionally exclude children's shoes from the scope of measures on the grounds of Community interest as set out in recitals 250 to 252 of the provisional Regulation, i.e. notably more frequent replacement of children's shoes and, thus, a higher financial impact of anti-dumping measures on the financial situation of an average European family, were reassessed.
Drugič, utemeljitve o začasni izključitvi otroških čevljev iz obsega ukrepov zaradi interesa Skupnosti, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah 250 do 252 začasne uredbe, tj. pogostejša zamenjava otroških čevljev in tako večji finančni vpliv protidampinških ukrepov na finančno stanje povprečne evropske družine, so bile ponovno ocenjene.
In this respect, it was established that on average children's shoes import prices are according to Eurostat statistics in general substantially lower than adults' shoes import prices (more than 33 %).
V zvezi s tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da so uvozne cene otroške obutve po statistiki Eurostata v povprečju na splošno bistveno nižje od uvoznih cen čevljev za odrasle (več kot 33 %).
Consequently, the impact of an ad valorem anti-dumping duty on children's shoes would be proportionally lower.
Posledično bi bil vpliv protidampinške dajatve ad valorem na otroške čevlje sorazmerno nižji.
In addition, the definitive findings lead overall to lower definitive duty levels than the measures at provisional stage.
Poleg tega dokončne ugotovitve vodijo na splošno do nižjih stopenj dokončne dajatve kot pa ukrepi v začasni fazi.
This, again, results in a lower financial impact of measures.
To pa ponovno zmanjša finančni vpliv ukrepov.
Moreover, as already set out in recital 249 of the provisional Regulation it is not considered likely that consumers would bear the full brunt of any measures.
Kot je bilo navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 249 začasne uredbe prav tako ni verjetno, da bi potrošniki nosili polno breme kakršnih koli ukrepov.
No interested party has provided any substantiated evidence which could support a different view.
Nobena zainteresirana stranka ni predložila nobenega utemeljenega dokaza, ki bi podprl drugačno stališče.
In this context, it is duly noted that consumers' organisations did not comment at all, which suggests that the impact of measures — regardless whether it concerns children's or adults' footwear — are effectively not a real concern for the interests of their constituency.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da potrošniške organizacije niso predložile nobenih pripomb, kar kaže na to, da vpliv ukrepov – ne glede na to, ali zadevajo otroško obutev ali obutev za odrasle – njihovim interesom ne povzroča nobenih resnih skrbi.
Taking account of the above analysis, it is evident that the definitive exclusion of children's shoes from measures could not be warranted.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj opisane analize je očitno, da dokončne izključitve otroških čevljev iz ukrepov ni mogoče upravičiti.
As a result there is no compelling evidence to prove, when addressing the imposition of definitive measures which remove materially injury caused by dumping practices, that consumer's interests outweigh the interests of the Community industry.
Zato ni nobenega prepričljivega dokaza, da pri obravnavi uvedbe dokončnih ukrepov, ki odpravljajo znatno škodo, povzročeno z dampingom, interesi potrošnika prevladajo nad interesi industrije Skupnosti.
For those reasons, the claim was accepted and it is hereby confirmed that, given the above, the imposition of definitive measures on the product concerned, including children's footwear, would not be against the overall interest of consumers.
Zato je bila trditev sprejeta in se potrdi, da uvedba dokončnih ukrepov za zadevni izdelek, vključno z otroško obutvijo, glede na zgoraj povedano ne nasprotuje splošnim interesom potrošnikov.
Interest of the distributors/retailers
Interes distributerjev/prodajalcev na drobno
It is recalled that at provisional stage, only a limited number of representations were received from distributors/retailers or organisations of distributors/retailers: one submission was received from a consortium of retailers from one Member State, and questionnaire replies were received from three importers who also have their own distribution network, including two supermarket chains.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bilo v začasni fazi od distributerjev/prodajalcev na drobno ali organizacij distributerjev/prodajalcev na drobno prejetih le omejeno število stališč: prejeto je bilo samo eno stališče od konzorcija prodajalcev na drobno iz ene države članice ter izpolnjeni vprašalniki treh uvoznikov iz iste države članice, ki imajo prav tako svojo distribucijsko mrežo, vključno z dvema verigama supermarketov.
Only one of those four parties submitted comments following the imposition of provisional measures, and no additional individual distributor or retailer submitted any comment.
Samo ena od navedenih štirih strank je predložila pripombe po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov in noben drug neodvisni distributer ali prodajalec na drobno ni predložil nobene pripombe.
An association of importer that did cooperate in the investigation since the beginning of the procedure challenged the conclusion that only a limited number of representations were received, on the grounds that this association represents companies that are also distributors and retailers in addition to their function of importers.
Združenje uvoznikov, ki je sodelovalo v preiskavi od začetka postopka, je izpodbijalo sklep, da je bilo prejeto le omejeno število stališč, saj naj bi to združenje predstavljalo družbe, ki poleg uvoza opravljajo tudi dejavnosti distribucije in prodaje na drobno.
It also claimed that at least two of its members, located in two different Member States have supplied detailed information to the Commission.
Prav tako je združenje trdilo, da sta vsaj dva njegova člana iz dveh različnih držav članic Komisiji predložila podrobnejše informacije.
The Commission recognises that this association represents companies that sometimes also have their own distribution network, and the conclusion regarding the number of representations should indeed be nuanced in that respect.
Komisija priznava, da predstavlja to združenje družbe, ki imajo včasih tudi lastno distribucijsko mrežo, in da je treba sklep v zvezi s številom stališč zato dejansko ublažiti.
Nevertheless, the primary function of those companies is to import footwear.
Vseeno pa je primarna dejavnost navedenih družb uvoz obutve.
Essentially, however, no precise and verifiable data, other than provided by the three above mentioned companies, was provided by distributors and retailers to the Commission, in order to assess their economic situation and to what extent they would be financially affected by any measures.
Vendar pa distributerji in prodajalci na drobno Komisiji niso predložili nobenih natančnih podatkov in podatkov, ki bi jih bilo mogoče preveriti, razen tistih, ki so jih predložile tri zgoraj navedene družbe, s pomočjo katerih bi Komisija ocenila njihov gospodarski položaj in finančni vpliv katerega koli ukrepa nanje.
And it is mainly only on the basis of such information that the Commission is in a position to carry out a detailed analysis.
Komisija lahko v glavnem samo na podlagi takšnih informacij izvede podrobno analizo.
As concerns the alleged cooperation of its two members, is should be clarified that one of them failed to provide a questionnaire reply within the deadlines, and could therefore not be used.
Kar zadeva domnevno sodelovanje njenih dveh članov, je treba pojasniti, da eden od njiju izpolnjenega vprašalnika ni predložil v roku in ga tako ni bilo mogoče uporabiti.
In its submission, the association provided figures and examples showing what would be the impact of the measures on importers that also have retail activities.
Združenje je predložilo podatke in primere o tem, kakšen bi bil vpliv ukrepov na uvoznike, ki se ukvarjajo tudi s prodajo na drobno.
Those figures were however made available far beyond the granted deadlines to provide such data, and seems to refer to only one company — the name of which is not mentioned — which did apparently not cooperate to the investigation.
Navedeni podatki so bili na razpolago veliko pozneje od dodeljenih rokov za predložitev takšnih podatkov in zdi se, da se nanašajo samo na eno družbo, katere ime ni navedeno in ki očitno ni sodelovala v preiskavi.
Those figures, that could therefore not be validated, could therefore not be considered.
Podatkov, ki jih ni bilo mogoče ovrednotiti, torej ni bilo mogoče upoštevati.
The association further claims that due to their financial situation, importers with retail activities will not be in a position to pass on, even partially, any price increase to consumers, and that some retailers, especially those exclusively sourcing from the countries concerned, would not survive the imposition of measures.
Združenje nadalje trdi, da uvozniki, ki se ukvarjajo s prodajo na drobno, zaradi svojega finančnega stanja ne bodo sposobni prenesti, niti delno, na potrošnike nobenega zvišanja cen, in da nekateri prodajalci na drobno, zlasti tisti, ki se oskrbujejo izključno iz zadevnih držav, uvedbe ukrepov ne bi preživeli.
The argument that companies would not be in a position to pass on, at least, partially any cost increase to consumers clearly conflicts with the claims made by various parties, including the submission made by the association of importers, that consumer prices will increase as a result of the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Utemeljitev, da družbe ne bodo sposobne, vsaj delno, prenesti nobenega povišanja stroškov na potrošnike, je jasno v nasprotju s trditvami različnih strank, vključno s trditvijo združenja uvoznikov, da se bodo porabniške cene zvišale kot posledica uvedbe protidampinških ukrepov.
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, and as confirmed by those contradictory statements, it is very likely that, on average, any impact of measures on the import price would at least be partially passed on to consumers.
Na podlagi informacij, zbranih med preiskavo, in kot je bilo potrjeno z navedenimi protislovnimi izjavami, je zelo verjetno, da bo v povprečju vsak vpliv ukrepov na uvozne cene vsaj delno prenesen na potrošnike.
It can naturally not be excluded that certain retailers directly and exclusively importing from the countries concerned would indeed be negatively affected by any measures.
Seveda ni mogoče izključiti, da bodo morebitni ukrepi negativno vplivali na nekatere prodajalce na drobno, ki izvažajo neposredno in izključno iz zadevnih držav.
It should however be recalled that the Community interest analysis is made on an overall basis, i.e. based on the average situation of the parties in the Community concerned by the proceeding, and it can therefore never be excluded that some individual parties will be indeed be affected differently than the majority.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da analiza interesa Skupnosti temelji na splošni osnovi, tj. na podlagi povprečnega položaja strank v Skupnosti, ki jih postopek zadeva, in zato ni mogoče izključiti, da bodo ukrepi na nekatere stranke vplivali drugače kot na večino.
In this respect, reference is made to the recital 275 of the provisional Regulation, where it was recognised that measures may indeed have a possible negative effect on the financial situation of certain importers.
V zvezi s tem je naveden sklic na uvodno izjavo 275 začasne uredbe, v kateri je bilo priznano, da lahko ukrepi dejansko negativno vplivajo na finančno stanje nekaterih uvoznikov.
Finally, the association claimed that the Commission is mistaken in its understanding of the differences between retail channels.
Nazadnje je združenje trdilo, da se Komisija v svojem razumevanju razlik med potmi prodaje na drobno moti.
In this respect, it claimed that independent retailers are supplied not only by wholesalers in the Community, but also sometimes import themselves.
V zvezi s tem je združenje trdilo, da neodvisnih prodajalcev na drobno ne oskrbujejo samo prodajalci na debelo v Skupnosti, ampak včasih uvažajo tudi sami.
It claimed that retailers in the, Commission sample were all brand retailers and that therefore the Commission's analysis was not appropriate.
Prav tako je trdilo, da so bili prodajalci na drobno v vzorcu Komisije vsi prodajalci na drobno, ki se ukvarjajo s prodajo blagovnih znamk, in zato analiza Komisije ni ustrezna.
In the absence of detailed information concerning the financial situation of retailers and distributors, the Commission carried out an overall analysis of the sector.
Komisija je ob odsotnosti podrobnih informacij o finančnem stanju prodajalcev na drobno in distributerjev opravila splošno analizo sektorja.
The purpose of this analysis was merely to identify the main distribution channels, the structure of those distributors and retailers, in order to examine how they would be affected by measures.
Namen te analize je bil zgolj določiti glavne distribucijske poti ter strukturo navedenih distributerjev in prodajalcev na drobno, s čimer bi proučili vpliv ukrepov nanje.
It can not be excluded that the specific situation of individual distributors is not exactly reflected in this overall analysis.
Ni mogoče izključiti, da se poseben položaj neodvisnih distributerjev v analizi ne odraža popolnoma.
For information, it is also noted that the description and conclusions drawn within the framework of this investigation also correspond to the findings of the Commission's previous anti-dumping investigation on footwear [6], and no indications were given that the situation of the footwear distribution sector changed since then.
V vednost je treba omeniti tudi, da opis in sklepne ugotovitve, do katerih je prišlo v okviru te preiskave, ustrezajo tudi ugotovitvam prejšnjih protidampinških preiskav obutve, ki jih je izvedla Komisija [6], in da od takrat niso bile predložene nobene navedbe o spremembi distribucijskega sektorja za obutev.
More specifically, the provisional Regulation stated in its recital 260 that independent retailers are usually supplied by wholesalers in the Community.
V uvodni izjavi 260 začasne uredbe je natančneje navedeno, da se prodajalci na drobno običajno oskrbujejo pri prodajalcih na debelo v Skupnosti.
From this, it was therefore not excluded that those retailers also have other sources of supply.
Na podlagi tega zato ni bilo izključeno, da imajo navedeni prodajalci na drobno tudi druge vire oskrbe.
As concerns the allegation on brand retailers, the Commission did not make use of any sample, but instead analysed all the information that was made available by cooperating parties.
Kar zadeva trditev o prodajalcih na drobno, ki prodajajo blagovne znamke, Komisija ni uporabila nobenega vzorca, ampak namesto tega analizirala vse informacije, ki so jih dale na razpolago sodelujoče stranke.
In this respect, it should be noted that reference was made in the provisional Regulation to the absence of cooperation by branded retail chain, i.e. retail chains with a brand name, which is different from retailers of branded footwear, of which indeed one cooperated.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bil v začasni uredbi naveden sklic na nesodelovanje drobnoprodajne verige z blagovno znamko, tj. drobnoprodajnih verig, dejavnih na področju prodaje blagovnih znamk, ki se razlikuje od prodajalcev na drobno, ki se ukvarjajo s prodajo obutve blagovnih znamk in od katerih je eden dejansko sodeloval.
No further claims was made that would alter the conclusions of the provisional Regulation.
Predložene niso bile nobene dodatne trditve, ki bi spremenile sklepne ugotovitve začasne uredbe.
The conclusion that the impact of the definitive measures on the importers and distributors is likely to remain limited, as set out in recital 264 of the provisional Regulation, is therefore confirmed.
Sklep o verjetnem omejenem vplivu dokončnih ukrepov na uvoznike in distributerje, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 264 začasne uredbe, se zato potrdi.
The comments received by the various interested parties have been carefully analysed to the extent they were duly substantiated, and have been addressed below.
Pripombe različnih zainteresiranih strank so bile, v kolikor so bile ustrezno utemeljene, skrbno analizirane in so obravnavane v nadaljevanju.
Certain importers claimed that given their profit margin, which is less than the level of the anti-dumping duty, they would be unable to survive anti-dumping duties, unless they are able to share that additional burden with wholesalers and retailers.
Nekateri uvozniki so trdili, da glede na svojo stopnjo dobička, ki je nižja od stopnje protidampinške dajatve, ne bodo mogli preživeti protidampinških dajatev, razen če bodo lahko to dodatno breme delili s prodajalci na debelo in drobno.
It is further claimed that this would not be possible because wholesalers and retailers would not accept any price increase, but rather switch to suppliers that can deliver without anti-dumping duties.
Poleg tega trdijo, da to ne bo mogoče, ker prodajalci na debelo in drobno ne bodo sprejeli nobenega zvišanja cen, ampak se bodo raje preusmerili na dobavitelje, ki lahko dobavljajo brez protidampinških dajatev.
The fact that the profit margin is lower than the level of the anti-dumping duty is not relevant.
Dejstvo, da je stopnja dobička nižja od stopnje protidampinške dajatve, ni pomembno.
Indeed, while the level of the anti-dumping measures is expressed as a percentage of the import price, the profit margin is expressed as a percentage of the turnover, i.e. the selling price.
Medtem ko je raven protidampinških ukrepov dejansko izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene, je stopnja dobička izražena kot odstotek prometa, tj. prodajne cene.