natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that the information submitted by the importer concerning the testing results was not representative, but rather anecdotal, since it singled out only one production lot.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da informacije, ki jih je v zvezi s testnimi rezultati predložil zadevni uvoznik, niso bile reprezentativne, ampak nezanesljive, saj so zadevale eno samo proizvodno serijo.
Even within this lot, all tested granular PTFE fulfilled the required specifications in order to comply with the norm, despite variations in their technical specifications.
Celo v tej seriji so vsi testirani granulirani PTFE imeli zahtevane lastnosti, potrebne za uskladitev z normativom, kljub razlikam med njihovimi tehničnimi lastnostmi.
Therefore, the evidence submitted was not considered conclusive.
Zato se predloženi dokazi niso šteli za zadostne.
In any case, based on the information submitted by the abovementioned Russian exporting producer and the importer, the claimed quality difference could not be quantified.
V vsakem primeru domnevnih razlik v kakovosti ni bilo mogoče količinsko ovrednotiti, temelječ na informacijah, ki sta jih predložila zgoraj omenjena ruski proizvajalec izvoznik in uvoznik.
Therefore, it is confirmed that granular PTFE imported from this exporting producer after post-treatment was of a similar quality as the granular PTFE produced and sold by the Community industry on the Community market and could be used in a wide-range of similar applications.
Zato velja, da je bil granulirani PTFE, ki ga je uvozil ta proizvajalec izvoznik po nadaljnji obdelavi, podobne kakovosti kot granulirani PTFE, ki ga je industrija Skupnosti proizvedla in prodala na trgu Skupnosti, ter bi se lahko uporabil za vrsto podobnih namenov.
Given the above, the adjustment provisionally made when calculating the undercutting margin was found to be appropriate.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je bilo za začasno uskladitev, narejeno pri izračunu stopnje nelojalnega nižanja cen, ugotovljeno, da je primerna.
However, the adjustment was corrected on the basis of the verified information of two users, which allowed a precise calculation of these costs.
Vendar je bila uskladitev popravljena na podlagi preverjenih informacij dveh uporabnikov, ki sta omogočila natančen izračun teh stroškov.
Thus, the adjustment amounted to 36,7 % of the purchase price of the users/importers concerned.
Tako je uskladitev znašala 36,7 % nakupne cene zadevnih uporabnikov/uvoznikov.
Taken into consideration the abovementioned corrections and in the absence of any other comments, recitals 97 to 98 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih popravkov in ker ni nobenih drugih pripomb, se uvodne izjave (97) do (98) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
On the basis of the above, the comparison on a per-model basis showed that the product concerned originating in the PRC and Russia was sold in the Community at prices which undercut those of the Community industry by 20,5 and 13,5 % respectively during the IP, when expressed as a percentage of the Community industry’s prices.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je primerjava posameznih vrst pokazala, da je bil zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz LRK in Rusije prodan v Skupnosti po cenah, ki so v OP nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti za 20,5 % in 13,5 %, izraženo kot odstotek cen industrije Skupnosti.
Situation of the Community industry and conclusion on injury
Položaj industrije Skupnosti in končna ocena škode
Certain interested parties pointed to the positive trends of certain injury factors and claimed that it would not be sufficient that other injury indicators such as sales prices and profitability showed negative trends to conclude that material injury had been suffered by the Community industry.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so opozorile na pozitivna gibanja nekaterih dejavnikov škode in so trdile, da za sklep, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo, ni dovolj, da so drugi kazalci škode, kot so prodajne cene in dobičkonosnost, kazali negativna gibanja.
It should first be noted that Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation provides that while the impact of dumped imports on the Community industry shall be examined on the basis of an evaluation of all relevant economic factors and indices, none of these factors on its own or together with others can necessarily give decisive guidance.
Najprej je treba opomniti, da člen 3(5) osnovne uredbe določa, da je treba vpliv dampinškega uvoza na industrijo Skupnosti proučiti na podlagi ocene ustreznih ekonomskih dejavnikov in indeksov, pri čemer ne eden ne več teh dejavnikov niso nujno odločilni.
It is therefore not required that all injury factors show a negative trend in order to conclude that the Community industry suffered material injury.
Zato za sklep, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo, ni potrebno, da vsi dejavniki škode odražajo negativno gibanje.
On this basis, in order to determine whether the Community industry suffered material injury, it is important that its overall financial situation be considered.
Na tej podlagi je za določitev, ali je industrija Skupnosti utrpela znatno škodo, pomembno, da se upošteva njeno splošno finančno stanje.
Thus, in case of the positive development of certain injury indicators, these should not be considered in isolation but in a broader context, i.e. together with the development of other injury indicators in order to make meaningful conclusions.
Tako se v primeru pozitivnega razvoja nekaterih kazalnikov škode le-teh ne bi smelo obravnavati samih, temveč v širšem okviru, tj. skupaj z razvojem drugih kazalnikov škode, da bi prišli do veljavnih sklepov.
In the present case and as outlined in recital 117 of the provisional Regulation, the positive trend of certain injury indicators has to be seen in the context of the overall significant negative effects of the imports under consideration on the performance of the Community industry and the latter’s reaction to this.
V tem primeru in kot je bilo poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (117) začasne uredbe, se mora pozitivno gibanje nekaterih kazalnikov škode obravnavati v okviru splošno pomembnih negativnih učinkov obravnavanega uvoza na storilnost industrije Skupnosti in njenega odziva na to.
The overall negative picture of the Community industry’s situation is in particular translated in a decline of its sales prices and profitability.
Na splošno se negativen položaj industrije Skupnosti odraža zlasti v nižanju njenih prodajnih cen in dobičkonosnosti.
It is therefore considered that the approach taken for the provisional determinations was reasonable and in line with the basic Regulation and is therefore maintained for the definitive findings.
Zato se šteje, da je bil pristop pri začasnih določitvah ustrezen in v skladu z osnovno uredbo in se zato še naprej uporablja za končne ugotovitve.
Some interested parties argued that the Community industry was able to increase its production capacity, volume and capacity utilisation, while consumption in the Community was decreasing, which would not point to an injurious situation of the Community industry.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je bila industrija Skupnosti zmožna povečati svoje proizvodne zmogljivosti, obseg in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, medtem ko se je potrošnja v Skupnosti zmanjšala, kar ne odraža škodljivih razmer v industriji Skupnosti.
In fact, the decrease in consumption (by 12 %) was only felt in 2002, when the Community industry’s production volume decreased in line by 13 %, which is also translated into a decrease in the capacity utilisation during the same year.
Zmanjšanje potrošnje (za 12 %) se je čutilo samo leta 2002, ko se je obseg proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti hkrati zmanjšal za 13 %, kar je bilo isto leto ugotovljeno tudi pri izkoriščanju zmogljivosti.
As a consequence and as outlined in recital 102 of the provisional Regulation, the Community industry had to lower its sales prices, thereby increasing its sales volume in order to be able to compete with the dumped imports.
Posledično in kot je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (102) začasne uredbe, je morala industrija Skupnosti znižati svoje prodajne cene in s tem povečati svoj obseg prodaje, da bi lahko konkurirala dampinškemu uvozu.
Nevertheless, even the sales volume of the Community industry decreased slightly during 2002.
Kljub temu se je tudi obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti leta 2002 nekoliko zmanjšal.
Furthermore, the development of the production volume should also be seen in the more global context than solely in relation to the development of the Community consumption.
Poleg tega bi se moral razvoj obsega proizvodnje obravnavati v širšem okviru kot le v povezavi z razvojem potrošnje Skupnosti.
Thus, as mentioned in recital 134 of the provisional Regulation, export sales of the Community industry were slightly increasing, which had also an impact on production figures.
Tako se je, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (134) začasne uredbe, izvoz industrije Skupnosti nekoliko povečal, kar je vplivalo tudi na številke glede proizvodnje.
Furthermore, the increase in the production volume of granular PTFE is partly explained by the fact that some Community producers increased the internal use of granular PTFE for the production of, for example, compounds and micronised grades.
Poleg tega je delni vzrok povečanja obsega proizvodnje granuliranega PTFE dejstvo, da so nekateri proizvajalci Skupnosti povečali notranjo uporabo granuliranega PTFE za proizvodnjo, na primer sestavin in mikroniziranih vrst.
Finally, the overall increase of production volume and production capacity during the period considered is also part of the Community industry’s attempt to react to the dumped imports by trying to increase sales volume, albeit at the expense of sales prices and profitability.
Nazadnje je splošno povečanje obsega proizvodnje in proizvodne zmogljivosti v obravnavanem obdobju prav tako del poskusa industrije Skupnosti, da bi se s povečanjem obsega prodaje odzvala na dampinški uvoz, čeprav na račun prodajnih cen in dobičkonosnosti.
Therefore, the findings set out in recitals 101 and 102 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (101) in (102) začasne uredbe potrdijo.
Likewise, some interested parties argued that the increase in sales volume and market share, in particular with a parallel decrease in demand, would clearly indicate that the Community industry did not suffer material injury.
Podobno so nekatere zainteresirane stranke trdile, da je bilo povečanje obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža, zlasti z vzporednim zmanjšanjem povpraševanja jasen znak, da industrija Skupnosti ni utrpela znatne škode.
The Russian exporting producer also argued that such an increase in sales could not be explained by the Community industry’s strategy to lower its sales prices when faced with low-priced imports.
Ruski proizvajalec izvoznik je prav tako trdil, da takšno povečanje prodaje ni mogoče razložiti s strategijo industrije Skupnosti, da zaradi poceni uvoza zniža svoje prodajne cene.
In this context, the development of the Community industry’s sales volume was compared to that of the Russian imports which allegedly showed a downward trend despite decreasing import prices.
V tem okviru se je razvoj obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti primerjal z razvojem ruskega uvoza, ki naj bi se domnevno zmanjševal kljub nižjim uvoznim cenam.
However, it was found that the analysis of Russian import data showed a slightly different picture.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da je analiza ruskih podatkov o uvozu pokazala nekoliko drugačno sliko.
Thus, although imports and market share from Russia declined from 2001 to 2002 significantly, they dropped only marginally between 2002 and 2003 and even increased slightly during the IP.
Čeprav sta se uvoz in tržni delež Rusije od leta 2001 do 2002 močno zmanjšala, sta se med leti 2002 in 2003 zmanjšala le malo in se med OP celo nekoliko povečala.
In contrast, selling prices of the Russian imports showed a constant downward trend during the entire period considered.
Nasprotno so se v celotnem obravnavanem obdobju cene ruskega uvoza stalno nižale.
In parallel, Chinese import prices declined to a higher extent and sales volume and market shares of these imports increased significantly during the same period.
Vzporedno so se kitajske uvozne cene še dodatno znižale, obseg prodaje in tržni deleži tega uvoza pa sta se v istem obdobju močno povečala.
This indicates that Russian exporters faced with the low-priced Chinese imports on the Community market were, as the Community industry, obliged to lower their import prices even further to regain their market share in the Community.
To kaže, da so morali ruski izvozniki tako kot industrija Skupnosti zaradi poceni kitajskega uvoza na trg Skupnosti še bolj znižati svoje uvozne cene, da bi zopet pridobili svoj tržni delež v Skupnosti.
Moreover, as imports from Russia and the PRC have been cumulated, it is more appropriate to carry out this analysis not separately for each exporting country concerned, but together.
Ker se je uvoz iz Rusije in LRK kopičil, je ustrezneje, če se ta analiza ne izvede ločeno za vsako zadevno državo izvoznico, ampak skupaj.
In this respect, it is recalled that the market share of the imports remained continuously very high and their prices dropped dramatically and significantly undercut those of the Community industry.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je bil tržni delež uvoza trajno zelo velik, njegove cene pa so se močno znižale in so občutno in nelojalno nižale cene industrije Skupnosti.
Therefore, the argument of the Russian exporting producer had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba utemeljitev ruskega proizvajalca izvoznika zavrniti.
It is therefore reiterated that the development of the Community industry’s sales volume and market share has to be seen in correlation with the parallel decrease in sales value and unit prices due to the dumped imports and the consequent significant negative impact on the Community industry’s profitability.
Zato se ponovno poudari, da je treba razvoj obsega prodaje in tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti obravnavati v povezavi z vzporednim zmanjšanjem prodajne vrednosti in cen na enoto zaradi dampinškega uvoza in s posledičnim močnim negativnim vplivom na dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti.
As mentioned in recital 61 of this Regulation, in order to reach a meaningful conclusion on the overall financial situation of the Community industry, the positive development of these indicators should not be considered in isolation but together with the development of the remaining injury indicators.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (61) te uredbe, se za veljavni sklep o splošnem finančnem stanju industrije Skupnosti pozitivni razvoj teh kazalnikov ne sme obravnavati sam, ampak skupaj z razvojem ostalih kazalnikov škode.
In the absence of any other comments in this particular regard, the findings set out in recitals 103 and 104 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker glede tega ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (103) in (104) začasne uredbe.
One Chinese and the two Russian exporting producers also argued that the stocks of the Community industry decreased significantly between 2003 and the IP, which would indicate that no material injury was suffered.
En kitajski in oba ruska proizvajalca izvoznika so tudi trdili, da so se zaloge industrije Skupnosti močno zmanjšale med letom 2003 in OP, kar naj bi pomenilo, da znatne škode ni bilo.
It is noted that stock movements during the period considered were not significant and did not show a clear trend.
Treba je opomniti, da gibanje zalog v obravnavanem obdobju ni bilo veliko in ni kazalo jasne smeri svojega razvoja.
Indeed, while stocks decreased by 13 % between 2001 and 2002, they increased by 23 percentage points between 2002 and 2003 and then decreased again by 17 percentage points in the IP.
Zaloge so se med letoma 2001 in 2002 zmanjšale za 13 % in se povečale za 23 odstotnih točk med letoma 2002 in 2003 ter se nato v OP spet zmanjšale za 17 odstotnih točk.
Moreover, it should also be noted that the decrease in stocks between 2003 and the IP only amounted to 216 tons which corresponds to 4,3 % of the sales volume of the Community industry in 2003 and 3,9 % during the IP.
Poleg tega je treba opomniti, da so se zaloge med letoma 2003 in OP zmanjšale za 216 ton, kar ustreza 4,3 % obsega prodaje industrije Skupnosti leta 2003 in 3,9 % med OP.
In any event, the Community industry produced granular PTFE mainly to order and products kept in stock are usually goods awaiting dispatch to customers.
Industrija Skupnosti je proizvajala granulirani PTFE predvsem za naročila in izdelki v zalogi so navadno blago, ki čaka na odpremo strankam.
Therefore, the increase in stock in 2003 is rather due to a delay in delivery and cannot be seen as a meaningful injury indicator because it has no impact as such on the Community industry’s financial situation.
Zato je povečanje zalog leta 2003 povzročila zamuda pri dostavi in se ne more obravnavati kot veljaven kazalnik škode, ker kot tak nima vpliva na finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti.
Therefore, in this case the development of stock was not considered as a meaningful injury indicator.
Zato se v tem primeru razvoj zalog ni obravnaval kot veljaven kazalnik škode.
Some interested parties also argued that the increase in stock in 2003, namely the year prior to the IP, caused injury to the Community industry because the Community industry would have been forced to sell this increased stock at lower prices during the IP.
Nekatere zainteresirane stranke so trdile tudi, da je povečanje zalog leta 2003, tj. leto pred OP, povzročilo škodo industriji Skupnosti, saj naj bi bila industrija Skupnosti med OP prisiljena prodati to povečano zalogo po nižjih cenah.
As already mentioned in recital 73, production was made to order and therefore, the increase in stock in 2003 is likely due to a delay in delivery, whereas customers and prices were already determined.
Kakor je bilo že omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (73), je proizvodnja sledila naročilom in je zato vzrok povečanja zalog leta 2003 po vsej verjetnosti zamuda pri dostavi blaga, katerega stranke in cene so že bile določene.
In any case, the increase in stocks of 283 tons in 2003 cannot be considered as significant as it only represents 5,6 % of the sales volume of that year.
V nobenem primeru pa se povečanje zalog za 283 ton leta 2003 ne more šteti za tako pomembno, saj predstavlja le 5,6 % obsega prodaje navedenega leta.
It was therefore concluded that this increase in stock prior to the IP could not cause the material injury suffered by the Community industry.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da to povečanje zalog pred OP ni moglo povzročiti znatne škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
This claim had therefore to be rejected and the findings of recital 105 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ta zahtevek je bilo zato treba zavrniti, ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (105) začasne uredbe pa se potrdijo.
The same exporting producers argued that the negative trend in the Community’s sales prices would not be a meaningful injury indicator since sales prices of granular PTFE have decreased globally as a consequence of market forces.
Isti proizvajalec izvoznik je trdil, da negativno gibanje prodajnih cen Skupnosti ni veljaven kazalnik škode, saj so se na splošno prodajne cene granuliranega PTFE znižale zaradi tržnih sil.
One exporting producer also questioned the correctness of the calculations without, however, providing any further detail in how far the calculations would not be correct.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je tudi dvomil o pravilnosti izračunov, vendar ni predložil podrobnih podatkov, ki bi potrdili njegovo domnevo glede nepravilnega izračuna.
As far as the calculation of the Community industry’s sales prices is concerned, no error was detected in the provisional calculations which are therefore confirmed.
Glede izračunov prodajnih cen industrije Skupnosti ni bila odkrita nobena napaka v začasnih izračunih, ki se zato potrdijo.
It is reiterated that sales prices in the Community dropped significantly during the period considered which had a considerable impact on the Community industry’s profitability.
Ponovno je treba poudariti, da so se prodajne cene Skupnosti močno znižale v obravnavanem obdobju, kar je znatno vplivalo na dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti. Prav tako je bilo potrjeno, da so bile zaradi neposrednega vpliva na finančno stanje Skupnosti obravnavane kot ključni dejavniki pri določitvi škode.
It is also confirmed that these were considered as key factors in the injury determination, due to their direct impact on the Community industry’s financial situation.
Potrdi se tudi, da so te cene zaradi svojega neposrednega vpliva na finančno stanje industrije Skupnosti upoštevale kot ključni dejavniki pri določitvi škode.
It is therefore confirmed that prices are a very meaningful injury indicator in this investigation and the exporting producer’s claim in this respect had to be rejected.
Zato se potrdi, da so cene veljaven kazalnik škode v tej preiskavi; zahtevek proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi s tem je bilo treba zavrniti.
More specifically as far as the argument of the alleged global price decrease is concerned, no factors were found which would point, for example, to cost reductions underlying such price decrease.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da glede utemeljitev za splošno domnevno znižanje cen ni bilo dejavnikov, ki bi kazali na npr. znižanje stroškov, ki bi takšno znižanje cen lahko pojasnilo.
It is therefore confirmed that prices are a very meaningful injury indicator in this investigation and the exporting producer’s claim in this respect had to be rejected in the context of the injury analysis.
Zato se potrdi, da so cene veljaven kazalnik škode v tej preiskavi; zahtevek proizvajalca izvoznika v zvezi s tem je bilo treba v okviru analize škode zavrniti.
The remainder of this argument is more linked to the question of a causal link and will therefore be addressed below in recitals 106 and 107.
Glede ostalega je ta utemeljitev bolj povezana z vprašanjem vzročne škode in bo zato obravnavana v uvodnih izjavah (106) in (107).
In the absence of any other comment in this particular regard, the findings of recital 106 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker glede tega ni bilo nobenih drugih pripomb, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (106) začasne uredbe.
It was argued that the provisional determinations failed to explain the growth of the Community industry, in particular in comparison to the shrinking Community consumption for the period considered.
Trdilo se je, da začasne določbe niso uspele pojasniti rasti industrije Skupnosti, zlasti ne v povezavi z vedno manjšo potrošnjo Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
Since the growth of the Community industry was determined by the development of its market share, reference is made to recital 103 of the provisional Regulation and to recitals 67 and 69 of this Regulation.
Ker je bila rast industrije Skupnosti določena z razvojem njenega tržnega deleža, se sklicuje na uvodno izjavo (103) začasne uredbe in na uvodni izjavi (67) in (69) te uredbe.
One Chinese exporting producer objected to the provisional conclusions that the ability to raise capital was not a meaningful injury indicator.
En kitajski proizvajalec izvoznik je ugovarjal začasnim sklepom, da zmožnost zbiranja kapitala ni veljaven kazalnik škode.
As outlined in recital 109 of the provisional Regulation, it was found that, since the Community producers are part of larger groups and therefore financed via intra-group cash pooling systems, the ability to raise capital was not a meaningful injury indicator, as it would normally not be affected, even if some producers of such larger groups are in a particularly injurious situation.
Kakor je poudarjeno v uvodni izjavi (109) začasne uredbe, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so proizvajalci Skupnosti del večjih skupin in se tako financirajo preko sistema „cash pooling“ (denarnega združevanja) znotraj skupine, zato zmožnost zbiranja kapitala ni veljaven kazalnik škode, saj se navadno ne spremeni, tudi če se nekateri proizvajalci iz takšnih večjih skupin nahajajo v posebno škodljivih razmerah.