natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, in anti-dumping investigations concerning imports originating in the PRC, normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6 of the said Article for those producers which were found to meet the criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, i.e. where it is shown that market economy conditions prevail in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe se normalna vrednost v protidampinških preiskavah v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz LRK določi v skladu z odstavki 1 do 6 navedenega člena za tiste proizvajalce, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, tj. kjer se izkaže, da veljajo pogoji tržnega gospodarstva v zvezi s proizvodnjo in prodajo podobnega izdelka.
business decisions are made in response to market signals, without significant State interference, and costs reflect market values,
poslovne odločitve se sprejemajo v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, brez občutnega državnega vmešavanja, stroški pa odražajo tržne vrednosti,
firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards (‘IAS’) and are applied for all purposes,
družbe imajo jasen seznam osnovnih računovodskih evidenc, ki se neodvisno pregledujejo v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi („MRS“) in se uporabljajo za vse namene,
no distortions carried over from the non-market economy system,
ni izkrivljanj, ki bi še ostala iz sistema netržnega gospodarstva,
exchange rate conversions are carried out at market rates.
pretvorbe deviznih tečajev se opravljajo po tržnih stopnjah.
The Commission sought all information deemed necessary and verified all information submitted in the MET application at the premises of the company in question.
Komisija je poiskala vse potrebne informacije in preverila vse informacije iz zahtevka za TGO v prostorih zadevne družbe.
The investigation showed that all five criteria laid down in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation were met by the applicant.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je vložnik izpolnil vseh pet meril, določenih v členu 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
It was therefore considered that MET should be granted to the applicant.
Zato se je sklenilo, da se vložniku TGO odobri.
As far as the determination of normal value is concerned, the Commission first established whether the total domestic sales of the product concerned made by the applicant were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Kar zadeva določitev normalne vrednosti, je Komisija najprej določila, ali je vložnikova domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v primerjavi s celotnim izvozom v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume was at least 5 % of the total export sales volume to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja šteje za reprezentativno, če predstavlja celotni obseg domače prodaje vsaj 5 % celotnega obsega izvoza v Skupnost.
The Commission established that PET was sold domestically by the applicant in overall representative volumes.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je vložnik PET prodajal na domačem trgu v celotnem reprezentativnem obsegu.
No distinction of types was made for the product concerned.
Zadevni izdelek se ni razlikoval glede na vrste.
No additional examination therefore needed to be made whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative on a type-by-type basis for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Zato ni bilo potrebno dodatno proučiti, ali je bila domača prodaja na podlagi primerjave vsake vrste posebej dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
An examination was also made as to whether the sales of PET sold domestically in representative quantities could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales of PET to independent customers.
Proučeno je bilo tudi, ali je mogoče za domačo prodajo PET v reprezentativnih količinah šteti, da se je izvajala v običajnem poteku trgovine, in sicer tako, da je bil določen delež dobičkonosne prodaje PET neodvisnim strankam.
Since the profitable sales volume of PET represented more than 80 % of the total domestic sales volume of PET, normal value was based on the actual domestic price, calculated as a weighted average of the prices of all domestic sales of PET made during the IP, irrespective of whether these sales were profitable or not.
Ker je obseg dobičkonosne prodaje PET predstavljal več kot 80 % celotnega obsega domače prodaje PET, je normalna vrednost temeljila na dejanski domači ceni, izračunani kot tehtano povprečje cen celotne domače prodaje PET med OP, ne glede na to, ali je bila ta prodaja dobičkonosna ali ne.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation, normal value was based on the prices, paid or payable, on the domestic market of the PRC.
Zato je v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost temeljila na plačanih ali plačljivih cenah na domačem trgu LRK.
The product concerned was exported directly to independent customers in the Community.
Zadevni izdelek je bil izvožen neposredno neodvisnim strankam v Skupnost.
Therefore, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, i.e. on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Torej je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, t.j. na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen.
The normal value and export prices were compared on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvoznih cen je bila opravljena na podlagi cene franko tovarna izdelka.
Appropriate adjustments were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Ustrezne prilagoditve so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
As provided for under Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price of the product concerned.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila narejena primerjava tehtane povprečne normalne vrednosti s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno zadevnega izdelka.
This dumping margin expressed as a percentage of the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, duty unpaid, for Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd is 5,6 %.
Stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek neto cene franko na meji Skupnosti, brez plačane dajatve, znaša za Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd. 5,6 %.
In the light of the results of the investigation, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed for the applicant at the level of the dumping margin found.
Glede na rezultate preiskave velja, da je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev za vložnika na ravni ugotovljene dampinške stopnje.
Regarding the form of the measure, it was considered that the amended anti-dumping duty should take the same form as the duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1467/2004.
Glede na obliko ukrepa se je sklenilo, da bi morala spremenjena protidampinška dajatev imeti enako obliko kot dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1467/2004.
It was established that PET prices can fluctuate in line with fluctuations in crude oil prices.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da lahko cene PET nihajo skladno z nihanjem cen surove nafte.
Therefore it was considered appropriate to impose duties in the form of a specific amount per tonne.
Zato se je štelo za primerno, da se dajatve uvedejo v obliki določenega zneska na tono.
Subsequently, the anti-dumping duty, calculated on the basis of the dumping margin expressed as a percentage, to imports of PET from Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co. Ltd is EUR 45 per tonne.
Tako znaša protidampinška dajatev, izračunana na podlagi stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek, na uvoz PET družbe Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd. 45 EUR na tono.
The dumping margin, established for the IP, of 5,6 % is below the country-wide injury elimination level of 27,3 %, which was established for the PRC in the original investigation.
Stopnja dampinga, določena za OP, v višini 5,6 % je pod stopnjo odprave škode za celotno državo v višini 27,3 %, ki je bila določena za LRK v prvotni preiskavi.
It is therefore proposed that a duty at the level of EUR 45 per tonne, which is based on the dumping margin of 5,6 %, shall be imposed and that Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/2004 be accordingly amended.
Zato se predlaga, da se uvede dajatev na stopnji 45 EUR na tono, ki temelji na stopnji dampinga v višini 5,6 %, in da se Uredba (ES) št. 1467/2004 ustrezno spremeni.
In the light of the above findings, the anti-dumping duty applicable to the applicant shall be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been made subject to registration pursuant to Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 523/2005.
Glede na zgornje ugotovitve se protidampinška dajatev, ki velja za vložnika, retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 523/2005.
The parties concerned were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose on imports of PET from the applicant an amended definitive anti-dumping duty and to levy this duty retroactively on imports made subject to registration.
Zadevne stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo uvesti spremenjeno dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz PET vložnika in retroaktivno obračunati to dajatev na uvoz, za katerega velja registracija.
Their comments were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Njihove pripombe so bile proučene in upoštevane, kjer je bilo to primerno.
This review does not affect the date on which the measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/2007 will expire pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation,
V skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe ta pregled ne vpliva na datum prenehanja veljavnosti ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1467/2004 –
The table in Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/2004 is hereby amended by adding the following:
Preglednici iz člena 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/2004 se doda naslednje:
The duty hereby imposed shall also be levied retroactively on imports of the product concerned which have been registered pursuant to Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 523/2005.
Uvedena protidampinška dajatev se retroaktivno obračuna za uvoz zadevnega izdelka, za katerega velja registracija v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 523/2005.
The customs authorities are hereby directed to cease the registration of imports of the product concerned originating in the People’s Republic of China produced by Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co. Ltd.
Carinski organi so dobili navodilo, da prenehajo z registracijo uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki ga proizvaja Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd.
OJ L 84, 2.4.2005, p. 9.
UL L 84, 2.4.2005, str. 9.
After the imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of PET originating in the PRC, the Commission received a request to initiate a ‘new exporter’ review of Regulation (EC) No 1467/2004, pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, from Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd (the ‘applicant’). The applicant claimed that it was not related to any of the exporting producers in the PRC subject to the anti-dumping measures in force with regard to PET.
Po uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz PET s poreklom iz LRK je Komisija v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe od družbe Jiangyin Chengsheng New Packing Material Co., Ltd. („vložnik“) prejela zahtevo za začetek pregleda „novega izvoznika“ v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/2004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2168/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2168/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the Cohesion Fund and the organisation of an information system in this field
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1831/94 o nepravilnostih in izterjavi nepravilno plačanih zneskov v okviru financiranja Kohezijskega sklada ter organizaciji informacijskega sistema na tem področju
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 of 16 May 1994 establishing the Cohesion Fund [1], and in particular Article 12(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1164/94 z dne 16. maja 1994 o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada [1], in zlasti člena 12(4) Uredbe,
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 [2] applies to all eligible measures provided for in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1164/94.
Uredba (ES) št. 1831/94 [2] se uporablja za vse upravičene ukrepe, določene v členu 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1164/94.
Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 should be updated in order to enhance the effectiveness of the system for reporting irregularities.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/94 je treba posodobiti za povečanje učinkovitosti sistema za sporočanje o nepravilnostih.
It is necessary to specify that the definition of ‘irregularity’ used for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 is taken from Article 1(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests [3].
Treba je poudariti, da opredelitev nepravilnosti, ki se uporablja v Uredbi (ES) št. 1831/94, ustreza opredelitvi iz člena 1(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 z dne 18. decembra 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti [3].
It is necessary to define the term ‘suspected fraud’, taking account of the definition of fraud contained in the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests [4].
Opredeliti je treba pojem suma goljufije ob upoštevanju opredelitve goljufije iz Konvencije z dne 26. julija 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti [4].
It is necessary to align the definition of ‘first administrative or judicial finding of fact’ to the one included in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 of 11 July 1994 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the structural policies and the organisation of an information system in this field [5].
Treba je uskladiti opredelitev „prve upravne ali sodne ugotovitve“ z opredelitvijo iz Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1681/94 z dne 11. julija 1994 o nepravilnostih in izterjavi nepravilno plačanih zneskov v okviru financiranja strukturnih politik ter organizaciji ustreznega informacijskega sistema na tem področju [5].
It should be clearly stated that Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 will remain applicable to cases of irregularities of less than EUR 10000 already reported.
Določiti je treba, da se Uredba (ES) št. 1831/94 še naprej uporablja za že sporočene primere nepravilnosti, nižje od 10000 EUR.
It is necessary to specify the information needed for dealing with the cases for which an amount cannot be recovered or is not expected to be recovered.
Opredeliti je treba potrebne podatke, ki bi omogočili obravnavanje primerov, v katerih ni mogoče izvršiti izterjave ali se njene izvršitve ne more pričakovati.
Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 should apply without prejudice to Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 of 29 July 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 as regards the management and control systems for assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund and the procedure for making financial corrections [6].
Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/94 je treba uporabljati brez poseganja v člen 7 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1386/2002 z dne 29. julija 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1164/94 glede sistemov upravljanja in nadzora pomoči, dodeljene v okviru Kohezijskega sklada, ter postopkov izvajanja finančnih popravkov [6].
Account must be taken of the obligations arising out of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data [7] and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [8].
Upoštevati je treba obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [7] ter Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov [8].
Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 should be amended accordingly,
Uredbo (ES) št. 1831/94 je treba zato spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1831/94 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1831/94 se spremeni:
“irregularity” means any infringement of a provision of Community law resulting from an act or omission by an economic operator which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general budget of the Communities by charging an unjustified item of expenditure to the Community budget;
‚nepravilnost’ pomeni vsako kršenje določb prava Skupnosti, ki je posledica dejanja ali opustitve s strani gospodarskega subjekta, ki je ali bi lahko z neupravičenimi izdatki škodljivo vplivalo na splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti;
“economic operator” means any natural or legal person or other entity taking part in the administration of assistance from the Funds, with the exception of Member States exercising their prerogatives as a public authority;
‚gospodarski subjekt’ pomeni katero koli fizično ali pravno osebo ter druge subjekte, ki sodelujejo pri izvajanju intervencij iz skladov, z izjemo držav članic pri izvrševanju javne oblasti;
“primary administrative or judicial finding” means a first written assessment by a competent authority, either administrative or judicial, concluding on the basis of specific facts that an irregularity has been committed, without prejudice to the possibility that this conclusion may subsequently have to be revised or withdrawn as a result of developments in the course of the administrative or judicial procedure;
‚prva upravna ali sodna ugotovitev’ pomeni prvo pisno oceno upravnega ali sodnega pristojnega organa, ki na podlagi trdnih dejstev ugotavlja obstoj nepravilnosti, ne glede na možnost, da je lahko ta ugotovitev kasneje spremenjena ali umaknjena glede na potek upravnega ali sodnega postopka;
“suspected fraud” means an irregularity giving rise to the initiation of administrative and/or judicial proceedings at national level in order to establish the presence of intentional behaviour, in particular fraud, such as is referred to in Article 1(1), point (a), of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests;
‚sum goljufije’ pomeni nepravilnost, zaradi katere se lahko sproži upravni in/ali sodni postopek na nacionalni ravni, da se ugotovi, ali je bilo dejanje namerno in zlasti ali je šlo za goljufijo, kakor je določena v členu 1(1)(a) Konvencije o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti;
“bankruptcy” means insolvency proceedings within the meaning of Article 2, point (a), of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000.
‚stečaj’ pomeni postopek v primeru insolventnosti v smislu člena 2(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000.
Article 2 is deleted.
Člen 2 se črta.
During the two months following the end of each quarter, beneficiary Member States shall report to the Commission any irregularities which have been the subject of a primary administrative and/or judicial finding.
V dveh mesecih po koncu vsakega četrtletja države članice upravičenke poročajo Komisiji o vsaki nepravilnosti, ki je bila predmet prve upravne in/ali sodne ugotovitve.
the identification of the project or measure in question and the project or CCI (common identification code) number;
opredelitev zadevnega projekta ali ukrepa in številko projekta ali kodo EIK (enotna identifikacijska koda);
where appropriate, whether the practice gives rise to a suspicion of fraud;
uporabljene postopke, ko je bila storjena nepravilnost;
the date on which the primary administrative or judicial finding on the irregularity was established;
datum uvedbe upravne ali sodne preiskave o nepravilnosti;
the total budget approved for the operation and the distribution of its co-financing between Community, national, private and other contributions;
celotni znesek proračuna, odobrenega za zadevni projekt ali ukrep, in razporeditev njegovega sofinanciranja med prispevke Skupnosti ter nacionalne in zasebne prispevke;
the amount affected by the irregularity and its distribution between Community, national, private and other contributions; where no payment of the public contribution has been made to the persons and/or other entities identified under point (k), the amounts which would have been wrongly paid had the irregularity not been identified;
znesek, namenjen z nepravilnostjo, in njegova razporeditev med prispevke Skupnosti ter nacionalne in zasebne prispevke; v primerih neplačila javnih prispevkov osebam in/ali drugim subjektom, določenim v pododstavku (k), zneski, ki bi bili nepravilno plačani, če se nepravilnost ne bi odkrila;
the suspension of payments, where applicable, and the possibilities of recovery;
morebitno odložitev plačil in možnosti za izterjavo;
the nature of the irregular expenditure.
naravo nepravilnega izdatka.
cases where the irregularity consists solely of the failure to partially or totally execute a measure co-financed by the Community budget owing to the bankruptcy of the bodies responsible for the implementation of the project or the final recipient.
primerov, v katerih je edini pomembni vidik nepravilnosti delna ali celotna neizvedba ukrepa, sofinanciranega s proračunom Skupnosti, zaradi stečaja organa izvajanja ali končnega prejemnika.
cases brought to the attention of the administrative authority by the bodies responsible for the implementation of the project and/or the final recipient voluntarily or before detection by the relevant authority, whether before or after the granting of the public contribution,
primerov, ki jih je organ izvajanja ali končni prejemnik sporočil upravnemu organu sam od sebe ali preden jih je pristojni organ odkril – pred ali po odobritvi javnega prispevka,
the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) is replaced by the following:
V odstavku 1 se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z:
‘Beneficiary Member States shall report to the Commission administrative or judicial decisions, or the main points thereof, concerning the termination of such procedures and shall state in particular whether or not the findings are such that fraud is suspected.’;
„Države članice upravičenke obvestijo Komisijo o upravnih ali sodnih odločbah ali njihovih glavnih točkah v zvezi s koncem teh postopkov in zlasti navedejo, ali ugotovitve razkrivajo sum goljufije ali ne.“;
Where a beneficiary Member State considers that an amount cannot be recovered or is not expected to be recovered, it shall inform the Commission, in a special report, of the amount not recovered and the reasons why the amount should, in its view, be borne by the Community or by the beneficiary Member State.
Če država članica upravičenka meni, da zneska ni mogoče v celoti izterjati ali da ni mogoče pričakovati, da bi bil v celoti izterjan, v posebnem poročilu obvesti Komisijo o neizterjanem znesku in razlogih, zakaj bi po njenem mnenju moral znesek bremeniti Skupnost ali državo članico upravičenko.