natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sierra Leone lacks an appropriate system in place to oversee its operators or the aircraft, and does not have the technical capability or resources to undertake such a task.
Sierra Leone nima vzpostavljenega primernega sistema za nadzor nad operaterji ali zrakoplovi in nima tehnične zmogljivosti ali sredstev za izvajanje take naloge.
Some holders of Air Operator Certificate (AOC) issued by Sierra Leone did not have their principal place of business in Sierra Leone, contrary to the requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago Convention.
Nekateri imetniki spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC), izdanega v Sierra Leone, nimajo svojega glavnega sedeža v Sierra Leone, kar je v nasprotju z zahtevami Priloge 6 k Čikaški konvenciji.
The corrective action plan presented by Sierra Leone is considered inappropriate (or insufficient) to correct the identified serious safety deficiencies.
Korekcijski akcijski načrt, ki ga je predstavila Sierra Leone, se šteje za neustreznega (ali nezadostnega) za popravo ugotovljenih resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
The Civil Aviation Authority of Sierra Leone has contracted a private company, International Aviation Surveyors (IAS), to conduct certain oversight activities on its behalf.
Uprava za civilno letalstvo Sierra Leone je sklenila pogodbo z zasebno družbo, International Aviation Surveyors (lAS), za izvajanje nekaterih dejavnosti nadzora v svojem imenu.
However, the arrangements entered into between the two parties in a Memorandum of Understanding [26] do not provide an adequate oversight system for aircraft on the Sierra Leone register.
Vendar pa ureditev, ki sta jo v memorandumu o soglasju [26] sklenili obe pogodbenici, ne zagotavlja ustreznega sistema nadzora nad zrakoplovi v registru Sierra Leone.
The aircraft/airlines covered by the MoU were not based in Sierra Leone and the lAS personnel were based in neither Sierra Leone nor the country in which the airlines were based.
zrakoplovi/prevozniki, zajeti v memorandumu o soglasju, niso imeli sedeža v Sierra Leone in osebje lAS ni imelo sedeža ne v Sierra Leone ne v državi, v kateri so imeli sedež prevozniki;
IAS did not appear to have any enforcement powers.
lAS ni imel nobenih izvršilnih pooblastil;
IAS assumed responsibility for routine inspections of the airlines concerned but the level of inspection activity was not specified.
lAS je prevzel odgovornost za rutinska preverjanja zadevnih prevoznikov, vendar raven dejavnosti preverjanja ni bila določena;
The MoU gave lAS a contractual relationship with the airlines concerned.
memorandum o soglasju je dodelil lAS pogodbeno razmerje z zadevnimi letalskimi prevozniki;
The MoU did not appear to adequately address the supervision of flight operations.
memorandum o soglasju ni ustrezno obravnaval nadzora nad letalskimi operacijami.
The authorities of Sierra Leone with responsibility for regulatory oversight of the following air carriers have shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight on these carriers: Aerolift Co. Ltd, Afrik Air Links, Air Leone Ltd, Air Rum Ltd, Air Salone Ltd, Air Universal Ltd, Destiny Air Services Ltd, First Line Air (SL) Ltd, Heavylift Cargo, Paramount Airlines Ltd, Star Air Ltd, Teebah Airways, West Coast Airways Ltd.
Organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad spodaj navedenimi letalskimi prevozniki, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvajanje primernega varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki: Aerolift Co. Ltd, Afrik Air Links, Air Leone Ltd, Air Rum Ltd, Air Salone Ltd, Air Universal Ltd, Destiny Air Services Ltd, First Line Air (SL) Ltd, Heavylift Cargo, Paramount Airlines Ltd, Star Air Ltd, Teebah Airways, West Coast Airways Ltd.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in Sierra Leone should be subject to an operating ban and included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za vse letalske prevoznike, certificirane v Sierra Leone, veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in da jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
Air carriers from Swaziland
Letalski prevozniki iz Svazija
There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Jet Africa, an air carrier certified in Swaziland.
Obstajajo preverjeni dokazi o resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih Jet Africa, letalskega prevoznika, certificiranega v Svaziju.
These deficiencies have been identified by the Netherlands during a ramp inspection performed under the SAFA programme [27].
Te pomanjkljivosti je med preverjanjem na ploščadi po programu SAFA [27] ugotovila Nizozemska.
Jet Africa did not respond adequately and timely to an enquiry by the civil aviation authority of the Netherlands regarding the safety aspect of its operation showing a lack of transparency or communication as demonstrated by the absence of reply to the correspondence sent by this Member State.
Jet Africa se ni primerno in pravočasno odzval na preiskavo uprave za civilno letalstvo Nizozemske v zvezi z varnostnim vidikom svoje dejavnosti, s čimer je pokazal pomanjkanje preglednosti ali komunikacije, kar je razvidno iz tega, da ni odgovoril na dopise, ki jih je poslala ta država članica.
There is no evidence of a corrective action plan presented by Jet Africa to correct the serious safety deficiencies in response to the Netherlands request.
Ni dokazov, da je Jet Africa predstavil korekcijski akcijski načrt za popravo resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti kot odgovor na zahtevo Nizozemske.
The authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Swaziland have shown an insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety standards, in particular as demonstrated by a USOAP audit which took place in March 1999.
Organi Svazija, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, niso pokazali dovolj sposobnosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje ustreznih varnostnih standardov (kot je zlasti razvidno iz revizije USOAP, opravljene v marcu 1999).
The audit report [28] concluded that at the time of the audit, Swaziland was not capable of satisfactorily undertaking safety oversight related responsibilities in respect of its airlines and aircraft register.
Revizijsko poročilo [28] je ugotovilo, da v času revizije Svazi ni bil sposoben, da zadovoljivo opravlja odgovornosti varnostnega nadzora v zvezi s svojimi prevozniki in registrom zrakoplovov.
It also noted that it was not possible to determine the actual number of aircraft on the register as it was not properly maintained.
Ugotovilo je tudi, da ni bilo mogoče določiti dejanskega števila zrakoplovov v registru, ker ni bil pravilno vzdrževan.
Neither was it possible for the audit team to determine the actual number of personnel licences issued by Swaziland that were still valid, as records were not being maintained.
Revizijska skupina tudi ni mogla določiti dejanskega števila še veljavnih licenc osebja, ki jih je izdal Svazi, ker evidence niso bile vzdrževane.
A USOAP audit follow up mission has not taken place because Swaziland has not provided ICAO with information on the progress it has made in implementing the action plan to address the audit findings.
Nadaljnje spremljanje USOAP revizije ni bilo izvedeno, ker Svazi ni zagotovil ICAO informacij o napredku, ki ga je opravil pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta, da bi obravnaval ugotovitve revizije.
The authorities of Swaziland with responsibility for regulatory oversight of the following air carriers have shown a lack of ability to carry out adequate safety oversight on these carriers: Aero Africa (Pty) Ltd, African International Airways (Pty) Ltd, Airlink Swaziland Ltd, Northeast Airlines (Pty) Ltd, Scan Air Charter Ltd, Swazi Express Airways, Jet Africa.
Organi Svazija, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor nad spodaj navedenimi letalskimi prevozniki, so pokazali pomanjkanje sposobnosti za izvedbo ustreznega varnostnega nadzora nad temi prevozniki: Aero Africa (Pty) Ltd, African International Airways (Pty) Ltd, Airlink Swaziland Ltd, Northeast Airlines (Pty) Ltd, Scan Air Charter Ltd, Swazi Express Airways, Jet Africa.
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that all air carriers certified in Swaziland should be subject to an operating ban and included in Annex A.
Zato se na podlagi skupnih meril oceni, da mora za vse letalske prevoznike, certificirane v Svaziju, veljati prepoved opravljanja letov in da jih je treba vključiti v Prilogo A.
General considerations concerning the carriers included in the list
Splošne ugotovitve glede prevoznikov, navedenih na seznamu
Since it would not compromise safety, all air carriers mentioned above can be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Ker ne bi ogrozilo varnosti, se lahko vsem zgoraj navedenim letalskim prevoznikom dovoli, da uresničujejo prometne pravice tako, da uporabljajo čarterske zrakoplove letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, če so izpolnjeni ustrezni varnostni standardi.
The Community list has to be updated regularly and as soon as it is required, in order to take into account the evolution of safety in relation to the air carriers concerned and on the basis of further evidence of remedial actions undertaken.
Seznam Skupnosti je treba posodabljati redno in takoj, ko je to potrebno, zaradi upoštevanja razvoja glede varnosti v zvezi z zadevnimi letalskimi prevozniki in na podlagi nadaljnjih dokazov o sprejetih sanacijskih ukrepih.
Air carriers not included in the list
Letalski prevozniki, ki niso vključeni na seznam
In light of the evidence provided by Tuninter and the authorities of Tunisia with responsibility for its regulatory oversight and further confirmation by Italy, it is considered that there is substantiated evidence that the safety deficiencies observed during two on-site inspections by the Italian authorities have been corrected by this carrier.
Na podlagi dokazov, ki jih je zagotovil Tuninter in organi Tunizije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, ter nadaljnje potrditve Italije, se šteje, da obstajajo utemeljeni dokazi, da je ta letalski prevoznik odpravil varnostne pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljene med dvema pregledoma na kraju samem, ki so ju opravili italijanski organi.
On the basis of the information provided by Germany, it is considered that there is no longer substantiated evidence of a lack of ability or willingness of the authorities of Tajikistan with responsibility for regulatory oversight of air carriers certified in this State.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Nemčija, se šteje, da ni več utemeljenih dokazov o pomanjkanju sposobnosti ali pripravljenosti organov Tadžikistana, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor nad letalskimi prevozniki, certificiranimi v tej državi.
On the basis of the information provided to Belgium showing that the deficiencies which led to a national ban on I.C.T.T.P.W. and South Airlines have been fully remedied, it is considered that there is no substantiated evidence of persisting serious safety deficiencies on the part of these air carriers.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Belgija, in ki kažejo, da so bile pomanjkljivosti, zaradi katerih je bil uvedena nacionalna prepoved za I.C.T.T.P.W. in South Airlines, v celoti odpravljene, se šteje, da ni več utemeljenih dokazov o vztrajnih in resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih teh letalskih prevoznikov.
On the basis of the information provided by Germany showing that the specific aircraft which led to the imposition of a operational restriction on Atlant Soyuz is no more part of its fleet, it is considered that there is no substantiated evidence of persisting serious safety deficiencies on the part of this air carrier.
Na podlagi informacij, ki jih je zagotovila Nemčija, in ki kažejo, da določeni zrakoplov, zaradi katerega je bila uvedena omejitev opravljanja dejavnosti za Atlant Soyuz, ni več del njegove flote, se šteje, da ni več utemeljenih dokazov o vztrajnih in resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivostih tega letalskega prevoznika.
On the basis of the information available at this stage, it is considered that there is no substantiated evidence of non-corrected serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Mauritanie.
Na podlagi informacij, ki so na tej stopnji na voljo, se šteje, da ni utemeljenih dokazov o tem, da Air Mauritanie ni odpravil resnih varnostnih pomanjkljivosti.
Nevertheless, the ability of the authorities of Mauritania with responsibility for regulatory oversight of this air carrier needs to be further assessed.
Kljub temu je treba nadalje ocenjevati sposobnost organov Mavretanije, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor nad tem letalskim prevoznikom.
To this end, an evaluation of the authorities of Mauritania with responsibility for regulatory oversight of this air carrier and the undertakings under its responsibility should be conducted within 2 months by the Commission with the assistance of the authorities of any interested Member States.
V ta namen mora Komisija v 2 mesecih s pomočjo organov vseh zainteresiranih držav članic opraviti oceno organov Mavretanije, odgovornih za regulativni nadzor nad tem letalskim prevoznikom, in podjetij pod njegovo odgovornostjo.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Air Safety Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni v tej uredbi, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za varnost v zračnem prometu –
This Regulation establishes the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of the basic Regulation.
Ta uredba vzpostavlja seznam Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, za katere velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti iz poglavja II osnovne uredbe.
Operating bans
Prepovedi opravljanja letov
The air carriers listed in Annex A are subject to a ban within the Community for all their operations.
Za letalske prevoznike, navedene v Prilogi A, velja prepoved opravljanja letov v Skupnosti za vse njihove dejavnosti.
The air carriers listed in Annex B are subject to operational restrictions within the Community.
Za letalske prevoznike, navedene v Prilogi B, veljajo omejitve opravljanja dejavnosti v Skupnosti.
The operational restrictions consist of a prohibition on the use of the specific aircraft or specific aircraft types mentioned in Annex B.
Omejitve opravljanja dejavnosti vključujejo prepoved uporabe določenega zrakoplova ali določene vrste zrakoplova, navedene v Prilogi B.
Enforcement
Uveljavitev
Member States shall inform the Commission of any measures taken under Articles 3(1) of the basic Regulation to enforce, within their territory, the operating bans included in the Community list in respect of the air carriers that are the subject of those bans.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o vseh ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi člena 3(1) osnovne uredbe, da bi na svojem ozemlju uveljavile prepovedi opravljanja letov iz seznama Skupnosti v zvezi z letalskimi prevozniki, za katere veljajo te prepovedi.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the first day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije.
Established by Article 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4).
Ustanovljen s členom 12 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 z dne 16. decembra 1991 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva (UL L 373, 31.12.1991, str. 4).
DGAC/F 2000-210No ref. for another SAFA inspection performed by Germany.
DGAC/F 2000-210Ni navedbe za drugo preverjanje SAFA, ki ga je izvedla Nemčija.
Factual Aviation Report, USA-National Transportation Safety Board, 2 March 2005, (NTSB ID: DCA05RA033).
Factual Aviation Report, USA-National Transportation Safety Board, 2. marca 2005, (NTSB ID: DCA05RA033).
SAFA ramp inspection performed by the Authorities of Belgium on March 11, 2006 in Brussels.
Preverjanje na ploščadi v okviru SAFA, so opravili belgijski organi 11. marca 2006 v Bruslju.
Correspondence between the UK Department of Transport and DGCA-Equatorial Guinea on the ‘Aircraft Register of Equatorial Guinea’ ( 27 March 2002).
Korespondenca med Ministrstvom za promet Združenega kraljestva in DGCA-Ekvatorialne Gvineje o „Registru zrakoplovov Ekvatorialne Gvineje“ ( 27. marca 2002).
ICAO-USOAP Summary Report — Audit of the Directorate of Civil Aviation of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea (Malabo, 14-18 May 2001).
ICAO-USOAP Summary Report – Audit of the Directorate of Civil Aviation of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea (Malabo, 14. do 18. maja 2001).
ICAO Council working paper C-WP/12471.
Delovni dokument C-WP/12471 Sveta ICAO.
Correspondence between the UK Department of Transport and ECAC on the ‘Issue of Aircraft Documentation by Non-Approved Companies’ ( 6 August 2003).
Korespondenca med Ministrstvom Združenega kraljestva za promet in ECAC glede „Izdaje dokumentacije za zrakoplove s strani neodobrenih družb“ ( 6. avgust 2003).
UK-CAA Regulation Group — Aircraft Survey Report, 5 March 1996 (Office code: 223).
UK-CAA Regulation Group – Aircraft Survey Report, 5 March 1996 (Office code: 223).
Correspondence between the Transport Ministry of Liberia and UK DGCA on the ‘inability, due to the Liberian Civil conflict, to maintain regulatory control over Liberian registered aircraft’, 28 August 1996.
Korespondenca med Ministrstvom za promet Liberije in UK DGCA o „nezmožnosti, da zaradi liberijske državljanske vojne vzdržuje regulativni nadzor nad zrakoplovi, registriranimi v Liberiji, 28. avgust 1996.“
Memorandum of Understanding between DCA Sierra Leone and ‘FAST International Aviation Surveyors on the inspection, surveillance and provision of regulatory services to extra-regional air operators’ (IAS/SL DCA MOA 201101).
Memorandum of Understanding between DCA Sierra Leone and „FAST International Aviation Surveyors on the inspection, surveillance and provision of regulatory services to extra-regional air operators“ (IAS/SL DCA MOA 201101).
ICAO-USOAP Summary Report — Audit of the Directorate of Civil Aviation of Swaziland, (Mbabane, 9-12 March 1999).
ICAO-USOAP Summary Report – Audit of the Directorate of Civil Aviation of Swaziland, (Mbabane, 9. do 12. marca 1999).
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE COMMUNITY [1] [1]
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, ZA KATERE VELJA PREPOVED OPRAVLJANJA LETOV V SKUPNOSTI ZA VSE DEJAVNOSTI [1] [1]
Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if different)
Naziv pravne osebe letalskega prevoznika, kot je naveden na spričevalu letalskega prevoznika (in njegovo tržno ime, če je drugačno)
Air Operator Certificate (AOC) Number or Operating Licence Number
Številka spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC) ali številka operativne licence
ICAO airline designation number
Oznaka ICAO
State of the Operator
Država operaterja
Unknown
Ni znana
Democratic People Republic of Korea (DPRK)
Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja (DPRK)
Comores
Komori
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC), including,
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Demokratične republike Kongo, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor (DRK), vključno
Democratic Republic of Congo (RDC)
Demokratična republika Kongo (DRK)
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Equatorial Guinea, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Ekvatorialne Gvineje, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Liberia, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Liberije, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Sierra Leone, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Sierra Leone, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno
All air carriers certified by the authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of Swaziland, including
Vsi drugi letalski prevozniki, ki so jih potrdili organi Svazija, odgovorni za regulativni nadzor, vključno
Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Vsem letalskim prevoznikom iz Priloge A se lahko dovoli uresničevanje prometnih pravic tako, da uporabljajo čarterske zrakoplove letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, če so izpolnjeni ustrezni varnostni standardi.
The operating ban on Ariana Afghan Airlines applies to all aircraft operated by this air carrier except the following one: A310 registration number F-GYYY.
Prepoved opravljanja letov za Ariana Afghan Airlines se uporablja za vse zrakoplove, ki jih upravlja ta letalski prevoznik, razen za naslednjega: A310 registrska številka F-GYYY.
LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY [1] [1]
SEZNAM LETALSKIH PREVOZNIKOV, KATERIH DEJAVNOSTI SO PREDMET OMEJITVE OPRAVLJANJA DEJAVNOSTI V SKUPNOSTI [1] [1]
Aircraft type
Vrsta zrakoplova
Registration number(s) and, when available, construction serial number(s)
Registrska številka(-e), in, če je na voljo, serijska številka(-e)
UN-76007 (cons. No 0003426765) 5a-DNA (cons.
UN-76007 (serijska št. 0003426765)
No 0023439140) 5A-DMQ (cons.
5a-DNA (serijska št. 0023439140)
UN-76008 (cons. No 0033448404)
UN-76008 (serijska št. 0033448404)
Lybia
Libija
All fleet with the exception of: L-101 All fleet with the exception of: 9Q-CHC (cons.
Vsa flota razen: L-101
No 193H-1206)
Vsa flota razen: 9Q-CHC (serijska št. 193H-1206
Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Letalskim prevoznikom iz Priloge B se lahko dovoli uresničevanje prometnih pravic tako, da uporabljajo čarterske zrakoplove letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, če se izpolnjujejo ustrezni varnostni standardi.
Hewa Bora Airways is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.
Hewa Bora Airways lahko za svoje trenutne dejavnosti v Evropski skupnosti uporablja le določeni, navedeni zrakoplov.
DGAC/F-2004 Nos 315, 316
DGAC/F-2004 št. 315, 316.
Air Operator Certificate (AOC) Number
Številka spričevala letalskega prevoznika (AOC)
Ariana Afghan Airlines [2]
Ariana Afgan Airlines [2]
Commission Regulation (EC) No 475/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 475/2006
In the week of 13 to 17 March 2006 applications were presented to the competent authorities in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 for import licences for a total quantity exceeding a country's delivery obligation quantity of ACP-India preferential sugar determined pursuant to Article 9 of that Regulation.
Zahtevki so bili predloženi zadevnim organom v tednu od 13. do 17. marca 2006, v skladu s členom 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, za izdajo uvoznih dovoljenj za celotno količino, ki presega obvezno količino za dostavo za zadevno državo, določeno v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003 za preferenčni sladkor AKP–Indija.
In the case of import licence applications presented from 13 to 17 March 2006 in line with Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1159/2003 licences shall be issued for the quantities indicated in the Annex to this Regulation.
Na podlagi zahtevkov za uvozna dovoljenja, vloženih od 13. do 17. marca 2006 v okviru člena 5(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1159/2003, se dovoljenja izdajo v mejah količin, določenih v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Week of 13.3.2006-17.3.2006: percentage of requested quantity to be granted
% za dostavo zahtevanih količin v tednu od 13.3.2006–17.3.2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 476/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 476/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 March 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 24. marca 2006.