natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The first grant instalment shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory implementation of the economic programme supported by the IMF under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility.
Prvi obrok donacij se sprosti na podlagi zadovoljivega izvajanja gospodarskega programa, ki se s podporo MDS izvaja v okviru programa pomoči za zmanjševanje revščine in spodbujanje rasti.
The second and any further instalments shall be released on the basis of a satisfactory implementation of the IMF-supported economic programme and any other measures laid down in the Memorandum of Understanding referred to in Article 2(1), and not before three months have elapsed since the release of the previous instalment.
Drugi obrok in morebitni preostali obroki se sprostijo na podlagi zadovoljivega izvajanja gospodarskega programa, ki se izvaja s podporo MDS, in na podlagi morebitnih drugih ukrepov iz obrazložitvenega memoranduma iz člena 2(1), vendar ne prej kot tri mesece po sprostitvi prejšnjega obroka.
The funds shall be paid to the National Bank of Georgia.
Sredstva bodo izplačana Nacionalni banki Gruzije.
The final recipient of the funds will be the Ministry of Finance of Georgia.
Končni prejemnik sredstev bo Ministrstvo za finance Gruzije.
The implementation of this assistance shall take place in accordance with the provisions of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3] and its implementing rules.
Zagotavljanje pomoči poteka v skladu z določbami Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti [3], in zadevnimi izvedbenimi pravili.
In particular, the Memorandum of Understanding referred to in Article 2(1) shall provide for appropriate measures by Georgia in relation to the prevention of and the fight against fraud, corruption and any other irregularities linked to this assistance.
Obrazložitveni memorandum iz člena 2(1) zlasti določi ustrezne ukrepe Gruzije za preprečevanje goljufij, korupcije in drugih morebitnih nepravilnosti v zvezi s pomočjo ter za boj proti njim.
It shall also provide for controls by the Commission, including the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), with the right to perform on-the-spot checks and inspections, and for audits by the Court of Auditors, where appropriate, to be carried out on the spot.Article 5
Določil bo tudi nadzorne mehanizme Komisije, v katere spada tudi Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), vključno s pravico do pregledov in inšpekcij na kraju samem, po potrebi pa bo določil tudi revizije, ki jih Računsko sodišče podobno opravi na kraju samem.Člen 5
At least once a year, before September, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report including an evaluation of the implementation of this Decision in the previous year.
Najmanj enkrat letno, in sicer pred septembrom, Komisija posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo, ki vsebuje oceno izvajanja tega sklepa v predhodnem letu.
Done at Brussels, 24 January 2006.
V Bruslju, 24. januarja 2006
Opinion delivered on 15.12.2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 15. decembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 322, 25.11.1997, p. 37.
UL L 322, 25.11.1997, str. 37.
Decision as amended by Decision 2000/244/EC (OJ L 77, 28.3.2000, p. 11).
Sklep, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2000/244/ES (UL L 77, 28.3.2000, str. 11).
authorising Latvia to extend the application of a measure derogating from Article 21 of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
o dovoljenju Latviji, da podaljša uporabo ukrepa o odstopanju od člena 21 Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
(Only the Latvian version is authentic)
(Besedilo v latvijskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [1], and in particular Article 27 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic glede prometnih davkov – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27 Direktive,
Under Article 27(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.
V skladu s členom 27(1) Direktive 77/388/EGS lahko Svet soglasno na predlog Komisije dovoli kateri koli državi članici, da uvede posebne ukrepe za odstopanje od določb Direktive zaradi poenostavitve postopka obračunavanja davka ali za preprečitev vrst davčnih utaj ali izogibanja davku.
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 16 March 2005, Latvia requested authorisation to extend the application of a derogation measure on timber transactions.
S pismom, vpisanim v evidenco pri Generalnem sekretariatu Komisije na dan 16. marca 2005, je Latvija zaprosila za dovoljenje o podaljšanju uporabe ukrepa odstopanja za transakcije z lesom.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 10 May 2005 of the request made by Latvia.
V skladu s členom 27(2) Direktive 77/388/EGS je Komisija s pismom z dne 10. maja 2005 obvestila druge države članice o zahtevku Latvije.
By letter dated 31 May 2005, the Commission notified Latvia that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the request.
S pismom z dne 31. maja 2005 je Komisija uradno obvestila Latvijo, da razpolaga z vsemi informacijami, potrebnimi za oceno zahtevka.
The timber market in Latvia is dominated by small local companies and individual suppliers.
Pretežni delež na trgu lesa v Latviji imajo majhne lokalne družbe in posamezni dobavitelji.
The nature of the market and businesses involved have generated tax fraud which the tax authorities have found difficult to control.
Narava trga in vpletenih podjetij je pripeljala do davčnih goljufij, ki jih davčni organi težko nadzorujejo.
In order to combat this abuse, a special provision was included in Latvia’s law on VAT, laying down that the person liable to pay tax is, under certain circumstances, the taxable person for whom the taxable supply of goods or services is carried out.
Da bi se obvladalo to zlorabo, je bila v latvijski zakon o DDV vključena posebna določba, ki določa, da je, v določenih okoliščinah, oseba, ki je dolžna plačati davek, tista, kateri se opravi obdavčljiva dobava blaga ali storitev.
Article 21(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, in the version set out in Article 28g of the said Directive, stipulates that under the internal system the taxable person supplying goods or services is normally liable for payment of the tax.
Člen 21(1) Direktive 77/388/EGS, v različici, določeni v členu 28g navedene direktive, določa, da je po notranjem sistemu davčni zavezanec, ki opravi obdavčljivo dobavo blaga ali storitev, običajno dolžan plačati davek.
However, the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Chapter 7, point 1(b) of Annex VIII thereto, authorised Latvia for a limited period to continue to apply its procedure for charging VAT on timber transactions.
Vendar je Akt o pristopu iz leta 2003, in zlasti poglavje 7, točka 1(b) Priloge VIII Akta o pristopu, dovolil Latviji, da v omejenem obdobju nadaljuje z uporabo svojega postopka obračunavanja DDV od transakcij z lesom.
The Commission understands that this arrangement has effectively enabled Latvia to reduce the risk of VAT evasion and to simplify the procedure for charging the tax in the timber market.
Komisija razume, da je ta ureditev dejansko omogočila Latviji, da je zmanjšala tveganje izogibanja DDV in poenostavila postopek za obračunavanje davka na trgu lesa.
The derogation has no adverse impact on the Communities’ own resources accruing from VAT,
Odstopanje nima negativnih vplivov na lastna sredstva Skupnosti od DDV –
By way of derogation from Article 21(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC, in the version set out in Article 28g thereof, Latvia is hereby authorised to continue to designate the recipient as the person liable to pay VAT in the case of timber transactions from 1 May 2005 to 31 December 2009.
Z odstopanjem od člena 21(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS, v različici, določeni v členu 28(g) Direktive, se Latviji dovoli, da nadaljuje z določanjem prejemnika kot osebe, ki je dolžna plačati DDV v primeru transakcij z lesom od 1. maja 2005 do 31. decembra 2009.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2005/92/EC (OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 19).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2005/92/ES (UL L 345, 28.12.2005, str. 19).
repealing Decision 2001/381/EC accepting an undertaking offered in connection with imports into the Community of certain aluminium foil originating in Russia
o razveljavitvi Sklepa Komisije 2001/381/ES o sprejetju zaveze, ponujene v zvezi z uvozom določenih aluminijastih folij s poreklom iz Rusije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 8 Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 950/2001 [2] the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foil (‘AHF’) originating, inter alia, in Russia.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 950/2001 [2] je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev na uvoz določenih aluminijastih folij („AHF“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije.
By Decision 2001/381/EC [3] the Commission accepted an undertaking offered by the Russian exporting producer Joint Stock ‘United Company Siberian Aluminium’, which since then has changed its name [4] to Open Joint Stock Company Rusal Sayanal (‘Sayanal’).
S Sklepom 2001/381/ES [3] je Komisija sprejela zavezo, ki jo je ponudil ruski proizvajalec izvoznik Joint Stock „United Company Siberian Aluminium“, ki je od takrat spremenil svoje ime [4] v Open Joint Stock Company Rusal Sayanal („Sayanal“).
REPEAL OF DECISION 2001/381/EC
RAZVELJAVITEV SKLEPA 2001/381/ES
Further to a request lodged by Sayanal, the Commission initiated [5] a partial interim review limited in scope to the examination of dumping in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Na zahtevo družbe Sayanal je Komisija začela [5] z delnim vmesnim pregledom, omejenim na preiskavo dampinga v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
The findings of the review, which are set out in detail in Council Regulation (EC) No 161/2006 [6], showed that Sayanal is no longer dumping.
Ugotovitve pregleda, ki so podrobno navedene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 161/2006 [6], so pokazale, da Sayanal ne izvaža več po dampinških cenah.
As a consequence, by the aforementioned Regulation, the anti-dumping duty rate applicable to imports of AHF from Sayanal has been set at 0 %.
Tako je bila s prej omenjeno uredbo stopnja protidampinške dajatve, uporabljene za uvoz AHF družbe Sayanal, določena na 0 %.
In view of the above, Decision 2001/381/EC, by which the Commission accepted an undertaking from Sayanal, should be repealed,
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba Sklep 2001/381/ES, s katerim je Komisija sprejela zavezo družbe Sayanal, razveljaviti –
Decision 2001/381/EC is hereby repealed.
Sklep 2001/381/ES se razveljavi.
This Decision shall take effect on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
OJ L 134, 17.5.2001, p. 1.
UL L 134, 17.5.2001, str. 1.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 998/2004 (OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 4).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 998/2004 (UL L 183, 20.5.2004, str. 4).
OJ L 134, 17.5.2001, p. 67.
UL L 134, 17.5.2001, str. 67.
See Notice 2004/C 193/03, (OJ C 193, 29.7.2004, p. 3).
Glej obvestilo 2004/C 193/03, UL C 193, 29.7.2004, str. 3.
OJ C 285, 23.11.2004, p. 3.
UL C 285, 23.11.2004, str. 3.
concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a maize product (Zea mays L., hybrid MON 863 × MON 810) genetically modified for resistance to corn rootworm and certain lepidopteran pests of maize
o dajanju v promet koruznega proizvoda (Zea mays L., križanec MON 863 × MON 810), gensko spremenjenega za odpornost proti koruznemu hrošču in nekaterim koruznim škodljivcem iz reda Lepidoptera, v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
(notified under document number C(2005) 5980)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 5980)
Having regard to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 18(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. marca 2001 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [1], in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 18(1) Direktive,
A notification concerning the placing on the market of two genetically modified maize products (Zea mays L., line MON 863 and hybrid MON 863 × MON 810) was submitted by Monsanto Europe S.A. to the competent authority of Germany (Reference C/DE/02/9).
Uradno obvestilo o dajanju na trg dveh gensko spremenjenih koruznih proizvodov (Zea mays L., linija MON 863, in križanec MON 863 × MON 810) je Monsanto Europe S.A. predložil pristojnim nemškim organom (sklic C/DE/02/9).
A unique identifier (MON-ØØ863-5×MON-ØØ81Ø-6) has been assigned to the MON 863 × MON 810 maize for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC [2] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 65/2004 of 14 January 2004 establishing a system for the development and assignment of unique identifiers for genetically modified organisms [3].
Za namene Uredbe (ES) št. 1830/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o sledljivosti in označevanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov ter sledljivosti živil in krme, proizvedenih iz gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ter o spremembi Direktive 2001/18/ES [2] in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 65/2004 z dne 14. januarja 2004 o vzpostavitvi sistema za razvijanje in dodeljevanje posebnih identifikatorjev za gensko spremenjene organizme [3] je bil za koruzo MON 863 × MON 810 določen posebni identifikator (MON-ØØ863-5×MON-ØØ81Ø-6).
The notification originally covered importation and use as for any other maize grains including feed, with the exception of food use and cultivation in the Community of varieties derived from the MON 863 transformation event and of the MON 863 × MON 810 hybrid.
Obvestilo je prvotno zajemalo uvoz in uporabo v Skupnosti za enak namen kot za katero koli drugo koruzo, vključno s krmo, razen za gojenje in uporabo kot živilo, za sorte, ki izhajajo iz transformacije MON 863 in križanca 863 × MON 810.
In accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 14 of Directive 2001/18/EC, the competent authority of Germany prepared an assessment report, which was forwarded in April 2003 to the Commission.
V skladu s postopkom iz člena 14 Direktive 2001/18/ES so pristojni organi Nemčije pripravili poročilo o oceni, ki je bilo aprila 2003 posredovano Komisiji.
The Commission forwarded the full notification and assessment report to the other Member States in May 2003.
Komisija je celotno sporočilo in poročilo o oceni posredovala drugim državam članicam maja 2003.
That assessment report concludes that no reasons have emerged on the basis of which consent for the placing on the market of MON 863 as well as MON 863 × MON 810 should be withheld, if specific conditions are fulfilled.
To poročilo o oceni zaključuje, da ni razlogov za zavrnitev odobritve za dajanje v promet MON 863 in MON 863 × MON 810, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
The competent authorities of other Member States raised objections to the placing on the market of MON 863 as well as MON 863 × MON 810.
Pristojni organi drugih držav članic so ugovarjali dajanju v promet MON 863 kot tudi MON 863 × MON 810.
The placing on the market of MON 810 maize is authorised in accordance with Commission Decision 98/294/EC of 22 April 1998 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified maize (Zea mays L. line MON 810), pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC [4].
Dajanje v promet koruze MON 810 je dovoljeno v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 98/294/ES z dne 22. aprila 1998 o dajanju v promet gensko spremenjene koruze (Zea mays L., linija MON 810) na podlagi Direktive Sveta 90/220/EGS [4].
The placing on the market of MON 863 is authorised in accordance with Commission Decision 2005/608/EC of 8 August 2005 concerning the placing on the market, in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of a maize product (Zea mays L., line MON 863) genetically modified for resistance to corn rootworm [5].
Dajanje v promet MON 863 je dovoljeno v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2005/608/ES z dne 8. avgusta 2005 o dajanju v promet koruznega proizvoda (Zea mays L. linije MON 863), gensko spremenjenega za odpornost proti koruznemu hrošču, v skladu z Direktivo 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [5].
On 2 April 2004, the European Food Safety Authority considered that it is scientifically valid to use the data from the single lines MON 863 and MON 810 to support the safety assessment of MON 863 × MON 810, but decided, with regard to the need for confirmatory data for the safety assessment of the hybrid itself, to request a 90-day sub-chronic rat study with the maize hybrid in order to complete its safety assessment.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane je 2. aprila 2004 menila, da je uporaba podatkov iz posameznih linij MON 863 in MON 810 v podporo oceni varnosti za MON 863 × MON 810 znanstveno veljavna, vendar se je glede na potrebo po potrdilnih podatkih za oceno varnosti križanca samega odločila, da bo zahtevala 90-dnevno subkronično študijo s koruznim križancem na podganah, da bi zaključila oceno varnosti.
The opinion adopted on 8 June 2005 by the European Food Safety Authority, concluded, from all evidence provided, that MON 863 × MON 810 is unlikely to have an adverse effect on human and animal health or the environment in the context of its proposed use.
Mnenje, ki ga je 8. junija 2005 sprejela Evropska agencija za varnost hrane na podlagi vseh pridobljenih dokazov navaja, da je malo verjetno, da bi imel MON 863 × MON 810 v okviru predlagane uporabe škodljiv vpliv na zdravje ljudi in živali ali na okolje.
The European Food Safety Authority also deemed that the scope of the monitoring plan provided by the applicant was in line with the intended uses of MON 863 × MON 810.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane je bila tudi mnenja, da je obseg načrta spremljanja, ki ga je predložil vlagatelj, usklajen s predvideno uporabo MON 863 × MON 810.
On 8 July 2005, Monsanto Europe S.A. agreed to limit the scope of the present Decision to import and processing.
Monsanto Europe S.A. je 8. julija 2005 privolil, da bo omejil obseg trenutne odločbe na uvoz in predelavo.
An application for the placing on the market of food and feed containing, consisting of, or produced from MON 863 × MON 810 has been made by Monsanto Europe S.A. under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed [6].
Monsanto Europe S.A. je v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o gensko spremenjeni hrani in krmi [6] vložil zahtevek za dajanje na trg hrane in krme, ki vsebuje MON 863 × MON 810 ali je iz njega sestavljena ali proizvedena.
An examination of the information submitted in the notification, the objections maintained by Member States in the framework of Directive 2001/18/EC, and the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority, discloses no reason to believe that the placing on the market of Zea mays L. hybrid MON 863 × MON 810 will adversely affect human or animal health or the environment.
Po preučitvi podatkov, predloženih v obvestilu, ugovorov držav članic v okviru Direktive 2001/18/ES in mnenja Evropske agencije za varnost hrane, ni razloga za domnevo, da bi dajanje v promet Zea mays L., križanca MON 863 × MON 810, škodljivo vplivalo na zdravje ljudi ali živali ali na okolje.
Adventitious or technically unavoidable traces of genetically modified organisms in products are exempted from labelling and traceability requirements in accordance with thresholds established under Directive 2001/18/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
Naključne ali tehnično neizogibne sledi gensko spremenjenih organizmov v proizvodih so izvzete iz zahtev po sledljivosti in označevanju v skladu s pragovi, določenimi v Direktivi 2001/18/ES in Uredbi (ES) št. 1829/2003.
In the light of the opinion of the European Food Safety Authority, it is not necessary to establish specific conditions for the intended uses with regard to the handling or packaging of the product and the protection of particular ecosystems, environments or geographical areas.
Glede na mnenje Evropske agencije za varnost hrane ni treba določiti posebnih pogojev za predvideno uporabo v zvezi z ravnanjem ali pakiranjem proizvoda ter zaščito nekaterih ekosistemov, okolij ali zemljepisnih območij.
The measures provided for in this Decision are not in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established under Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC and the Commission therefore submitted to the Council a proposal relating to these measures.
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, niso v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 30 Direktive 2001/18/ES, zato je Komisija Svetu predložila predlog glede teh ukrepov.
Since on the expiry of the period laid down in Article 30(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC, the Council had neither adopted the proposed measures nor indicated its opposition to them, in accordance with Article 5(6) of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission [7], the measures should be adopted by the Commission,
Ker ob izteku obdobja iz člena 30(2) Direktive 2001/18/ES Svet ni niti sprejel predlaganih ukrepov niti ni izrazil svojega nasprotovanja v skladu s členom 5(6) Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil [7], mora ukrepe sprejeti Komisija –