natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Director shall appoint the Deputy Director after approval by the Board.
Namestnika direktorja imenuje direktor po odobritvi upravnega odbora.
The Deputy Director shall be appointed for a period of three years, with the possible extension of one three-year term.’;
Namestnik direktorja je imenovan za obdobje treh let, z enkratno možnostjo podaljšanja mandata za tri leta.“;
The staff of the Institute, consisting of researchers and administrative staff, shall have the status of contract staff members and shall be recruited from among nationals of the Member States.
Osebje inštituta, ki ga sestavljajo raziskovalci in administrativno osebje, ima status pogodbeno zaposlenih članov osebja in je izbrano med državljani držav članic.
The Institute's researchers and the Deputy Director shall be recruited on the basis of merit and academic expertise with regard to the CFSP and, in particular, the ESDP, through fair and transparent competition procedures.’;
Raziskovalci inštituta in namestnik direktorja so izbrani na podlagi zaslug in akademske strokovnosti na področju SZVP in zlasti EVOP s poštenimi in preglednimi razpisnimi postopki.“;
By 30 September each year, the Director shall establish a draft annual work programme for the following year, accompanied by indicative long-term perspectives for the following years, and shall submit it to the Board.
Direktor do 30. septembra vsakega leta pripravi osnutek letnega programa dela za naslednje leto in ga skupaj z okvirnimi dolgoročnimi načrti za naslednja leta predloži upravnemu odboru.
By 30 November of each year, the Board shall approve the annual work programme.’;
Upravni odbor do 30. novembra vsakega leta odobri letni program dela.“;
Article 11(3) shall be replaced by the following:
člen 11(3) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The income of the Institute shall consist of contributions from the Member States according to the gross national income (GNI) scale.
Prihodki inštituta so sestavljeni iz prispevkov držav članic glede na lestvico bruto nacionalnega dohodka (BND).
With the agreement of the Director, additional contributions may be accepted from individual Member States or from other sources for specific activities.’;
S soglasjem direktorja se lahko za posebne dejavnosti sprejemajo dodatni prispevki posameznih držav članic ali iz drugih virov.“;
By 30 September each year, the Director shall submit to the Board an annual draft budget for the Institute covering administrative expenditure, operational expenditure and expected income for the following financial year.
Direktor do 30. septembra vsakega leta predloži upravnemu odboru predlog letnega proračuna inštituta, ki obsega upravne odhodke, operativne odhodke in pričakovane prihodke za naslednje finančno leto.
By 30 November of each year, the Board shall approve the annual budget of the Institute by unanimity of the representatives of the Member States.
Upravni odbor odobri letni proračun inštituta s soglasjem predstavnikov držav članic do 30. novembra vsakega leta.
The Board, with due regard to any urgency, shall approve the amending budget by unanimity of the representatives of the Member States.’;
Upravni odbor z ustreznim upoštevanjem nujnosti zadeve s soglasjem predstavnikov držav članic odobri spremembo proračuna.“;
Visiting researchers may for limited time periods be seconded to the Institute by Member States and third states, with the agreement of the Director, to participate in the activities of the Institute in accordance with Article 2.
S soglasjem direktorja lahko države članice in tretje države inštitutu za določeno obdobje začasno dodelijo gostujoče raziskovalce za sodelovanje pri dejavnostih inštituta v skladu s členom 2.
With the agreement of the Director, experts from Member States and officials from EU institutions or agencies may be seconded to the Institute for a fixed period, either to posts within the Institute's organisational structure or for specific tasks and projects.
S soglasjem direktorja se lahko strokovnjaki iz držav članic in uradniki institucij ali agencij Evropske unije dodelijo inštitutu za določeno obdobje, in sicer na delovna mesta znotraj organizacijske strukture inštituta in/ali za posebne naloge in projekte.
Staff members may be seconded for a fixed period in the interest of the service to a post outside the Institute, in accordance with the provisions relating to the staff of the Institute.
Člani osebja se lahko v skladu z določbami v zvezi z osebjem inštituta v interesu službe začasno dodelijo za določeno obdobje na delovno mesto zunaj inštituta.
The provisions relating to secondment shall be adopted by the Board on a proposal from the Director.’;
Določbe v zvezi z začasno dodelitvijo sprejme upravni odbor na predlog direktorja.“;
‘Article 18 a
„Člen 18a
The Commission shall be closely associated with the work of the Institute.
Komisija je tesno vključena v delo inštituta.
The Institute shall, as necessary, establish working relations with the Commission with a view to exchanging expertise and advice in areas of mutual interest.’;
Inštitut po potrebi vzpostavi delovne odnose s Komisijo, da se na področjih v skupnem interesu izmenjuje strokovno znanje in mnenja.“;
Article 19 shall be replaced by the following:
člen 19 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
By 31 July 2011 at the latest, the SG/HR shall present a report to the Council on the functioning of the Institute accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate recommendations with a view to its further development.’;
Generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik do 31. julija 2011 Svetu predloži poročilo o delovanju inštituta in mu po potrebi priloži ustrezna priporočila za nadaljnji razvoj inštituta.“;
Article 20(1), (2), (4) and (5) shall be deleted.
črta se člen 20(1), (2), (4) in (5).
OJ L 200, 25.7.2001, p. 1.
UL L 200, 25.7.2001, str. 1.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/952/EC (OJ L 346, 29.12.2005, p. 18).
Sklep, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2005/952/ES (UL L 346, 29.12.2005, str. 18)“;
The Institute's output shall be distributed as widely as possible, except as regards classified information, to which the Council's security regulations adopted by Decision 2001/264/EC shall apply.’; 2. Article 5(5) shall be replaced by the following:
Delovni rezultati inštituta se razširjajo v najširšem možnem obsegu, razen tajnih podatkov, za katere se uporabljajo predpisi Sveta o varovanju tajnosti, kakor so določeni v Sklepu 2001/264/ES.2. člen 5(5) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Council Common Position 2006/1011/CFSP
Skupno stališče Sveta 2006/1011/SZVP
implementing Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism
o izvajanju Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu
On 29 May 2006, the Council adopted Common Position 2006/380/CFSP updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP [2] and the list of persons, groups and entities to which that Common Position applies.
Svet je 29. maja 2006 sprejel Skupno stališče 2006/380/SZVP o posodobitvi Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP [2] in seznam oseb, skupin in organizacij, za katere se to skupno stališče uporablja.
The Council has determined that certain additional persons, groups and entities are involved in terrorists acts within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and that they should therefore be added to that list, in accordance with the criteria laid down in Article 1(4) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP,
Svet je določil, da so nekatere dodatne osebe, skupine in organizacije vpletene v teroristična dejanja v smislu Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP in da jih je zato treba dodati na omenjeni seznam v skladu z merili iz člena 1(4) omenjenega skupnega stališča –
The persons, groups and entities listed in the Annex shall be added to the list of persons, groups and entities to which Common Position 2001/931/CFSP applies.
Osebe, skupine in organizacije, naštete v Prilogi, se dodajo na seznam oseb, skupin in organizacij, za katere se uporablja Skupno stališče 2001/931/SZVP.
OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 25.
UL L 144, 31.5.2006, str. 25.
Persons, groups and entities to be added to the list annexed to Common Position 2001/931/CFSP
Osebe, skupine in organizacije, ki se dodajo na seznam, priložen Skupnemu stališču 2001/931/SZVP
I. PERSONS
I. OSEBE
AOURAGHE, Zine Labidine (a.k.a. Halifi Laarbi MOHAMED; a.k.a. Abed; a.k.a. Abid; a.k.a. Abu ISMAIL), born 18.7.1978 in Nador (Morocco), passport (Spain) No. ESPP278036
AOURAGHE, Zine Labidine (znan tudi kot Halifa Laarbi MOHAMED; Abed; Abid; Abu ISMAIL), rojen 18.7.1978 v Nadoru, Maroko, št. španskega potnega lista ESPP278036
BOUYERI, Mohammed (a.k.a. Abu ZUBAIR; a.k.a. SOBIAR; a.k.a. Abu ZOUBAIR), born 8.3.1978 in Amsterdam (The Netherlands)
BOUYERI, Mohammed (znan tudi kot Abu ZUBAIR; SOBIAR; Abu ZOUBAIR), rojen 8.3.1978 v Amsterdamu, Nizozemska
Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2006/783/PNZ
on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders
o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 31(1)(a) and 34(2)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 31(1)(a) in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe,
The European Council, meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, stressed that the principle of mutual recognition should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the Union.
Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Tampereju z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 poudaril, da mora načelo vzajemnega priznavanja postati temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah znotraj Unije.
According to paragraph 51 of the conclusions of the Tampere European Council, money laundering is at the very heart of organised crime, and should be rooted out wherever it occurs; the European Council is determined to ensure that concrete steps are taken to trace, freeze, seize and confiscate the proceeds of crime.
V skladu z odstavkom 51 sklepov Evropskega Sveta v Tampereju je pranje denarja v samem središču organiziranega kriminala in ga je treba izkoreniniti, kjerkoli se pojavi; Evropski Svet je odločen zagotoviti, da se sprejmejo konkretni ukrepi za sledenje, zamrznitev, zaseg in zaplembo premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji.
In that connection, in paragraph 55 of the conclusions, the European Council calls for the approximation of criminal law and procedures on money laundering (e.g. tracing, freezing and confiscating funds).
V povezavi s tem Evropski Svet v odstavku 55 sklepov poziva k približevanju kazenske zakonodaje in postopkov o pranju denarja (npr. sledenje, zamrznitev in zaplembo sredstev).
All Member States have ratified the Council of Europe Convention of 8 November 1990 on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime (the 1990 Convention).
Vse države članice so ratificirale Konvencijo Sveta Evrope z dne 8. novembra 1990 o pranju, odkrivanju, zasegu in zaplembi premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji („Konvencija iz leta 1990“).
The Convention obliges signatories to recognise and enforce a confiscation order made by another party, or to submit a request to its competent authorities for the purpose of obtaining an order of confiscation and, if such order is granted, enforce it.
Konvencija podpisnice obvezuje, da priznajo in izvršijo odredbo o zaplembi, ki jo je izdala druga stranka, ali da predložijo njenim pristojnim organom zahtevek za odredbo o zaplembi in jo izvršijo, če je bila odredba izdana.
The Parties may refuse requests for confiscation inter alia if the offence to which the request relates would not be an offence under the law of the requested Party, or if under the law of the requested Party confiscation is not provided for in respect of the type of offence to which the request relates.
Stranke lahko zavrnejo zahtevke za zaplembo med drugim, če kršitev, na katero se zahtevek nanaša, ne bi bila kršitev po zakonodaji zaprošene pogodbenice, ali če zakonodaja zaprošene pogodbenice ne predvideva zaplembe za vrsto kršitve, na katero se zahtevek nanaša.
On 30 November 2000 the Council adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters, giving first priority (measures 6 and 7) to the adoption of an instrument applying the principle of mutual recognition to the freezing of evidence and property.
Svet je 30. novembra 2000 sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah, ki daje prednost (ukrepa 6 in 7) sprejetju instrumenta o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja pri zamrznitvi premoženja in dokazov.
Moreover, pursuant to paragraph 3.3 of the programme, the aim is to improve, in accordance with the principle of mutual recognition, execution in one Member State of a confiscation order issued in another Member State, inter alia for the purpose of restitution to a victim of a criminal offence, taking into account the existence of the 1990 Convention.
Poleg tega je cilj, v skladu z odstavkom 3.3 programa, da se v skladu z načelom vzajemnega priznavanja, v eni državi članici izboljša izvršba odredbe o zaplembi, ki jo je izdala druga država članica, med drugim zaradi povrnitve v prejšnje stanje žrtvi kaznivega dejanja, ob upoštevanju obstoječe Konvencije iz leta 1990.
With a view to achieving this aim, this Framework Decision, within its field of application, reduces the grounds for refusal of enforcement and suppresses, among Member States, any system of conversion of the confiscation order into a national one.
Za doseganje tega cilja ta okvirni sklep na svojem področju uporabe zmanjšuje razloge za zavrnitev izvršbe in med državami članicami preprečuje kakršen koli sistem pretvorbe odredbe o zaplembi v nacionalno odredbo.
Council Framework Decision 2001/500/JHA [3] lays down provisions on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds from crime.
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2001/500/PNZ [3] predpisuje določbe o pranju denarja, identifikaciji, sledenju, zamrznitvi, zasegu in zaplembi pripomočkov za kazniva dejanja in premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem.
Under that Framework Decision, Member States are also obliged not to make or uphold reservations in respect of Article 2 of the 1990 Convention, in so far as the offence is punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order for a maximum of more than one year.
Poleg tega države članice v skladu z okvirnim sklepom ne smejo zahtevati ali ohraniti pridržkov glede člena 2 Konvencije iz leta 1990, če je za to kršitev najvišja zagrožena kazen odvzem prostosti ali nalog za pridržanje več od enega leta.
Finally, on 22 July 2003 the Council adopted Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence [4].
Na koncu je 22. julija 2003 Svet sprejel Okvirni sklep 2003/577/PNZ o izvršbi odredb o zamrznitvi premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji [4].
The main motive for organised crime is financial gain.
Glavni motiv organiziranega kriminala je finančni dobiček.
In order to be effective, therefore, any attempt to prevent and combat such crime must focus on tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscating the proceeds from crime.
Poskus preprečevanja in boja proti takemu kriminalu je lahko učinkovit samo, če je osredotočen na sledenje, zamrznitev, zaseg in zaplembo premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem.
It is not enough merely to ensure mutual recognition within the European Union of temporary legal measures such as freezing and seizure; effective control of economic crime also requires the mutual recognition of orders to confiscate the proceeds from crime.
Ne zadostuje zgolj zagotovitev vzajemnega priznavanja znotraj Evropske unije začasnih pravnih ukrepov, kot so zamrznitev in zaseg; učinkovit nadzor gospodarskega kriminala zahteva tudi vzajemno priznavanje odredb o zaplembi premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to facilitate cooperation between Member States as regards the mutual recognition and execution of orders to confiscate property so as to oblige a Member State to recognise and execute in its territory confiscation orders issued by a court competent in criminal matters of another Member State.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je olajšati sodelovanje med državami članicami glede vzajemnega priznavanja in izvršbe odredb o zaplembi premoženja in s tem zavezati državo članico, da na svojem območju prizna in izvrši odredbe o zaplembi, ki jih je izdalo sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve druge države članice.
This Framework Decision is linked to Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property [5].
Ta okvirni sklep je povezan z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2005/212/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o zaplembi premoženjskih koristi pridobljenih s kaznivimi dejanji in premoženja ter pripomočkov za kazniva dejanja [5].
The purpose of that Framework Decision is to ensure that all Member States have effective rules governing the confiscation of proceeds from crime, inter alia in relation to the onus of proof regarding the source of assets held by a person convicted of an offence related to organised crime.
Namen Okvirnega sklepa je zagotoviti, da imajo vse države članice učinkovita pravila, ki urejajo zaplembo premoženjskih koristi, pridobljenih s kaznivim dejanjem med drugim glede na dokazno breme glede vira sredstev, ki jih ima oseba, obtožena za kaznivo dejanje, povezano z organiziranim kriminalom.
Cooperation between Member States, based on the principle of mutual recognition and immediate execution of judicial decisions, presupposes confidence that the decisions to be recognised and executed will always be taken in compliance with the principles of legality, subsidiarity and proportionality.
Sodelovanje med državami članicami, ki temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja in takojšnji izvršbi sodnih odločb, predpostavlja zaupanje, da se bodo odločitve, ki jih je treba priznati in izvršiti, sprejele v skladu z načeli zakonitosti, subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti.
It also presupposes that the rights granted to the parties or bona fide interested third parties will be preserved.
Predpostavlja se tudi, da bodo ohranjene že zagotovljene pravice oseb ali zainteresiranih tretjih oseb v dobri veri.
In this context, due consideration should be given to preventing successful dishonest claims by legal or natural persons.
V tem smislu je treba ustrezno preučiti kako preprečiti, da bi bili nepošteni zahtevki pravnih ali fizičnih oseb uspešni.
The proper practical operation of this Framework Decision presupposes close liaison between the competent national authorities involved, in particular in cases of simultaneous execution of a confiscation order in more than one Member State.
Pravilno praktično delovanje tega okvirnega sklepa predpostavlja tesno povezavo med vključenimi pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi zlasti v primerih istočasne izvršbe odredbe o zaplembi v več državah članicah.
The terms ‘proceeds’ and ‘instrumentalities’ used in this Framework Decision are sufficiently broadly defined to include objects of offences whenever necessary.
Pojma „premoženjska korist“ in „pripomočki za kazniva dejanja“, ki se uporabljata v tem okvirnem sklepu, sta dovolj široko opredeljena, da lahko vključujeta predmete kršitev, kadarkoli je to potrebno.
Where there are doubts with regard to the location of property which is the subject of a confiscation order, Member States should use all available means in order to identify the correct location of that property, including the use of all available information systems.
Če ni jasno kje se nahaja premoženje, ki je predmet odredbe o zaplembi, morajo države članice uporabiti vsa razpoložljiva sredstva, da ugotovijo, kje se to premoženje nahaja, vključno z uporabo razpoložljivih informacijskih sistemov.
This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised by Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and reflected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Chapter VI thereof.
Ta okvirni sklep spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki jih priznava člen 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in ki jih določa Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, zlasti poglavje VI.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to confiscate property for which a confiscation order has been issued when objective grounds exist for believing that the confiscation order was issued for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing a person on account of his or her sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language, political opinion or sexual orientation, or that that person's position may be prejudiced for any of these reasons.
Ničesar iz tega okvirnega sklepa se ne razlaga kot prepoved zavrnitve zaplembe premoženja, za katerega je bila izdana odredba o zaplembi, kadar obstajajo objektivni razlogi za prepričanje, da je bila odredba o zaplembi izdana z namenom pregona ali kaznovanja osebe zaradi njegovega ali njenega spola, rase, veroizpovedi, narodnosti, državljanstva, jezika, političnega prepričanja ali spolne usmeritve, ali, da na položaj te osebe lahko vpliva kateri koli od teh razlogov.
This Framework Decision does not prevent any Member State from applying its constitutional rules relating to due process, freedom of association, freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media.
Ta okvirni sklep nobeni državi članici ne preprečuje uporabe njenih ustavnih pravil glede hitrosti postopka, svobode združevanja, svobode tiska in svobode izražanja v drugih medijih.
This Framework Decision does not address the restitution of property to its rightful owner.
Ta okvirni sklep ne zajema povrnitve premoženja zakonitemu lastniku.
This Framework Decision does not prejudice the end to which the Member States apply the amounts obtained as a consequence of its application.
Ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva na namen, za katerega države članice uporabijo zneske, ki so jih pridobile na podlagi njegove uporabe.
This Framework Decision does not affect the exercise of the responsibilities incumbent upon Member States with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security in accordance with Article 33 of the Treaty on European Union,
Ta okvirni ukrep ne vpliva na izvrševanje odgovornosti držav članic glede vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru ter varovanja notranje varnosti v skladu s členom 33 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji –
HAS ADOPTED THIS FRAMEWORK DECISION:
SPREJEL TA OKVIRNI SKLEP:
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to establish the rules under which a Member State shall recognise and execute in its territory a confiscation order issued by a court competent in criminal matters of another Member State.
Namen tega okvirnega sklepa je določiti pravila, na podlagi katerih država članica na svojem ozemlju priznava in izvršuje odredbe o zaplembi, ki jih je izdalo sodišče druge države članice, pristojno za kazenske zadeve.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, and any obligations incumbent on judicial authorities in this respect shall remain unaffected.
Ta okvirni sklep ne vpliva na obveznost spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel, določenih v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, in vse obveznosti pravosodnih organov ostanejo nespremenjene.
For the purpose of this Framework Decision,
V tem okvirnem sklepu:
‘issuing State’ shall mean the Member State in which a court has issued a confiscation order within the framework of criminal proceedings;
„država izdajateljica“ pomeni državo članico, v kateri je sodišče izdalo odredbo o zaplembi v okviru kazenskih postopkov;
‘executing State’ shall mean the Member State to which a confiscation order has been transmitted for the purpose of execution;
„država izvršiteljica“ pomeni državo članico, kateri je bila posredovana odredba o zaplembi v izvršbo;