natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in Swedish Interventionskorn, utan tillämpning av bidrag eller avgift, förordning (EG) nr 362/2006.
v švedščini Interventionskorn, utan tillämpning av bidrag eller avgift, förordning (EG) nr 362/2006.
Standing invitation to tender for the export of barley held by the United Kingdom intervention agency
Stalni natečaj za izvoz ječmena iz britanske intervencijske agencije
Form [1](Regulation (EC) No 362/2006)
Obrazec [1](Uredba (ES) št. 362/2006)
The commercial costs corresponding to insurance and services provision borne after the exit of the intervention stock up to the fob stage at the port of export, with the exception of transport costs.
Komercialni stroški ustrezajo stroškom zavarovanja in storitev, ki so nastali po odpremi intervencijske zaloge do franko ladje (FOB) v izvoznem pristanišču z izjemo stroškov za prevoz.
in Spanish Cebada de intervención sin aplicación de restitución ni gravamen, Reglamento (CE) no 362/2006
v španščini Cebada de intervención sin aplicación de restitución ni gravamen, Reglamento (CE) no 362/2006
in Portuguese Cevada de intervenção sem aplicação de uma restituição ou imposição, Regulamento (CE) n.o 362/2006
v portugalščini Cevada de intervenção sem aplicação de uma restituição ou imposição, Regulamento (CE) n.o 362/2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 363/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 363/2006
on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (tomatoes)
o izdaji izvoznih dovoljenj sistema B za sadje in zelenjavo (paradižnik)
In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for tomatoes will shortly be exceeded.
Glede na informacije, s katerimi danes razpolaga Komisija, obstaja nevarnost, da se okvirne količine, določene za tekoče izvozno obdobje za paradižnik, v kratkem prekoračijo.
To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for tomatoes after 2 March 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,
V izogib takšnemu stanju je treba zavrniti zahtevke za dovoljenja sistema B za paradižnik, izvožena po 2. marcu 2006, do konca tekočega izvoznega obdobja –
Applications for system B export licences for tomatoes submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2044/2005, export declarations for which are accepted after 2 and before 17 March 2006, are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvozna dovoljenja sistema B za paradižnik, vloženi v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 2044/2005, za katere se odobrijo izvozne deklaracije po 2. in pred 17. marcem 2006, se zavrnejo.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 364/2006
fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 2 March 2006
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev za nekatere vrste oluščenega riža od 2. marca 2006 dalje
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2004 of 30 August 2004 derogating from Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 as regards the import arrangements for importing rice and laying down separate transition rules for imports of basmati rice [1], and in particular Article 1,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1549/2004 z dne 30. avgusta 2004 o odstopanju od Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1785/2003 v delu, ki se nanaša na uvozni režim za riž, in o določitvi posebnih prehodnih pravil za uvoz riža basmati [1], in zlasti člena 1 Uredbe,
Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 100620 excluding import licences for Basmati rice have been issued in respect of 289488 tonnes for 1 September 2005 to 28 February 2006.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih posredovali pristojni organi, Komisija ugotavlja, da so bila uvozna dovoljenja za oluščen riž z oznako KN 100620 z izjemo uvoznih dovoljenj za riž basmati izdana za količino 289488 ton za obdobje od 1. septembra 2005 do 28. februarja 2006.
The import duty for semi-milled or wholly milled rice falling within CN code 100620, other than Basmati rice, must therefore be amended.
Uvozna dajatev za oluščen riž z oznako KN 100620 razen za riž basmati mora biti zato spremenjena.
As the applicable duty must be fixed no later than ten days from the end of the period referred to above, this Regulation must enter into force immediately,
Ker je treba dajatev določiti v desetih dneh od zaključka zgoraj navedenega obdobja, mora ta uredba začeti veljati takoj.
The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 100620 shall be EUR 65 per tonne.
Uvozna dajatev za oluščen riž z oznako KN 100620 znaša 65 EUR na tono.
Council Regulation (EC) No 365/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) 365/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating, inter alia, in India and terminating the partial interim review of the anti-subsidy measures applicable to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije in o zaključku delnega vmesnega pregleda protisubvencijskih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz, med drugim, Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic anti-dumping Regulation’), in particular Article 11(3) thereof, and Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (‘the basic anti-subsidy Regulation’), in particular Article 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), in zlasti člena 11(3) Uredbe, in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), in zlasti člena 19 Uredbe,
Existing measures and terminated investigations concerning the same product
Obstoječi ukrepi in zaključene preiskave glede istega izdelka
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [3], imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film falling within CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 and originating in India (‘the definitive countervailing measures’).
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [3] uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz folije iz polietilen tereftalata („PET“), ki se uvršča pod oznaki KN ex39206219 in ex39206290, s poreklom iz Indije („dokončni izravnalni ukrepi“).
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % imposed on imports from individually named exporters, with a residual duty rate of 19,1 % imposed on imports from all other companies.
Ukrepi v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini od 3,8 % do 19,1 % so bili uvedeni na uvoz poimensko navedenih izvoznikov, na uvoz iz vseh drugih družb pa je bila uvedena raven preostale dajatve v višini 19,1 %.
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [4], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of PET film originating, inter alia, in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [4] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
The measures took the form of an ad valorem duty ranging between 0 % and 62,6 % on imports of PET film originating in India (‘the definitive anti-dumping measures’), with the exception of imports from five Indian companies (Ester Industries Limited (Ester), Flex Industries Limited (Flex), Garware Polyester Limited (Garware), MTZ Polyfilms Limited (MTZ), and Polyplex Corporation Limited (Polyplex)) from whom undertakings had been accepted by Commission Decision 2001/645/EC [5] accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate film originating inter alia in India.
Ukrepi so bili v obliki dajatve ad valorem v višini od 0 % do 62,6 % na uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije („dokončni protidampinški ukrepi“), razen uvoza od petih indijskih družb (Ester Industries Limited („Ester“), Flex Industries Limited („Flex“), Garware Polyester Limited („Garware“), MTZ Polyfilms Limited („MTZ“) in Polyplex Corporation Limited („Polyplex“)), katerih zaveze so bile sprejete z Odločbo Komisije 2001/645/ES o sprejetju zavez, ponujenih v protidampinškem postopku v zvezi z uvozom folije iz polietilen tereftalata s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije [5].
The Council, by Regulations (EC) No 1975/2004 and (EC) No 1976/2004, extended the definitive countervailing and anti-dumping measures on imports of PET film originating in India, to imports of the same product consigned from Brazil and Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Svet je z Uredbama (ES) št. 1975/2004 in (ES) št 1976/2004 razširil dokončne izravnalne in protidampinške ukrepe za uvoz folije iz PET s poreklom iz Indije na uvoz istega izdelka, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je njegovo poreklo deklarirano v Braziliji ali Izraelu ali ne.
On 4 January 2005 [6], the Commission initiated a partial interim review of Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 limited to the level of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Komisija je 4. januarja 2005 [6] začela delni vmesni pregled Uredbe (ES) št. 1676/2001, omejen na raven dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 366/2006 [7] which amended the level of the definitive anti-dumping measures.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 366/2006 [7], s katero se je spremenila raven dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov.
On 10 December 2004 [8], the Commission initiated an expiry review of the definitive countervailing measures.
Komisija je 10. decembra 2004 [8] začela pregled zaradi izteka dokončnih izravnalnih ukrepov.
This investigation has been concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 367/2006 [9] which maintained the definitive countervailing measures.
Ta preiskava se je zaključila z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 367/2006 [9], s katero so se ohranili dokončni izravnalni ukrepi.
Requests for reviews
Zahtevka za pregled
Request for a review as regards countervailing measures
Zahtevek za pregled oblike protidampinških ukrepov
In 2002, a request for a partial interim review, limited in scope to the form of the countervailing measures in respect of one company, was lodged by (Polyplex), an Indian exporting producer from whom an undertaking had already been accepted by Decision 2001/645/EC in connection with the anti-dumping measures in force.
Leta 2002 je Polyplex, indijski proizvajalec izvoznik, katerega zaveza v zvezi z veljavnimi protidampinškimi ukrepi je bila že sprejeta z Odločbo 2001/645/ES, predložil zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled, omejen na obliko izravnalnih ukrepov glede ene družbe.
Polyplex provided information that an undertaking of the same nature would remove the injurious effects of subsidisation and could be monitored.
Polyplex je predložil informacije, iz katerih je razvidno, da bi zaveza iste vrste odpravila škodljive učinke subvencioniranja in bi se jo dalo nadzorovati.
Therefore, it was warranted to review the form of the countervailing measure.
Zato je bil zahtevek za pregled oblike izravnalnega ukrepa utemeljen.
In October 2003, a request for a partial interim review limited to the form of the anti-dumping measures was lodged by the following Community producers: Du Pont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH and Nuroll SpA (the applicants).
Oktobra 2003 so naslednji proizvajalci Skupnosti predložili zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled, omejen na obliko protidampinških ukrepov: Du Pont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH in Nuroll SpA („vložniki“).
The applicants represent a major proportion of the Community production of PET film.
Vložniki predstavljajo večji delež proizvodnje folije iz PET v Skupnosti.
Toray Plastics Europe indicated its support for the request, although it was not a formal applicant.
Družba Toray Plastics Europe je izrazila svojo podporo zahtevi, čeprav ni bila uradni vložnik.
The applicants alleged that the form of the measures (i.e. the existing undertakings as accepted by Decision 2001/645/EC) was no longer effective in removing the injurious dumping.
Vložniki so trdili, da oblika ukrepov (tj. obstoječe zaveze, kakor so bile sprejete z Odločbo 2001/645/ES) ni več ustrezna za odpravljanje škodljivega dampinga.
The applicants alleged that, since the acceptance of the existing undertakings, which are based on minimum import prices, the range of products sold by the exporters concerned had developed, notably to include more technically sophisticated film, so that the minimum prices under which some products may be categorised no longer reflected their true value, and thus the mechanism of the measures was no longer adequate in view of the new technological developments.
Vložniki so trdili, da se je zaradi sprejetja obstoječih zavez, temelječih na minimalnih uvoznih cenah, paleta izdelkov, ki so jih prodali zadevni izvozniki, razširila, predvsem zato, da bi vključila tehnično bolj razvito folijo, tako da minimalne cene, ki se lahko uporabljajo za nekatere izdelke, niso več odražale svoje prave vrednosti, zaradi česar mehanizem ukrepov glede na novi tehnološki razvoj ni bil več ustrezen.
Consequently, the undertakings were said to be no longer adequate to eliminate the injurious effects of dumping.
Zato so trdili, da zaveze niso več ustrezne za odpravljanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga.
Investigations
Preiskavi
Review regarding countervailing measures
Pregled izravnalnih ukrepov
On 28 June 2002, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [10], the initiation of a partial interim review of the anti-subsidy measures limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by the Indian exporting producer Polyplex, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Komisija je 28. junija 2002 v obvestilu o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [10], napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda protisubvencijskih ukrepov, omejenega na proučitev sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudil indijski proizvajalec izvoznik Polyplex v skladu s členom 19 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
Given that a partial interim review of the form of the anti-dumping measures (i.e. the existing undertakings) was initiated in November 2003, as mentioned in recitals (12) and (13) below, the question of the acceptability of Polyplex’s offer of an undertaking was kept open in order to complete both reviews at the same time.
Ker se je delni vmesni pregled oblike protidampinških ukrepov (tj. obstoječih zavez) začel novembra 2003, kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (12) in (13) spodaj, je ostalo vprašanje sprejemljivosti ponudbe družbe Polyplex o zavezi odprto, da bi se lahko oba pregleda zaključila istočasno.
The Commission officially informed Polyplex of its intentions in this regard.
Komisija je Polyplex uradno obvestila o svojih namenih glede tega.
No comments were made by the applicant in this respect.
Vložnik ni izrazil nobene pripombe v zvezi s tem.
Review of the form of the anti-dumping measures
Pregled oblike protidampinških ukrepov
On 22 November 2003, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [11], the initiation of a partial interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation.
Komisija je 22. novembra 2003 v obvestilu o začetku, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [11], napovedala začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe.
The review was limited in scope to the form of the measures applicable to the five Indian exporting producers from whom undertakings had been accepted.
Pregled je bil omejen na obliko ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za pet indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, katerih zaveze so bile sprejete.
The investigation period was from 1 October 2002 to 30 September 2003 (the current IP).
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. oktobra 2002 do 30. septembra 2003 („sedanje OP“).
The Commission officially informed the exporting producers, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers about the initiation of the review.
Komisija je proizvajalce izvoznike, predstavnike države izvoznice in proizvajalce Skupnosti uradno obvestila o začetku pregleda.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit indicated in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zaprosijo za zaslišanje v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In order to obtain the information deemed necessary for its investigation, the Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers concerned, which all cooperated by replying to the questionnaire.
Za pridobitev informacij, za katere meni, da so potrebne za njeno preiskavo, je Komisija poslala vprašalnike zadevnim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, ki so sodelovali in izpolnili vprašalnik.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following exporting producers in India:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Indiji:
The product concerned is, as defined in the original investigation, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, normally declared under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290.
Zadevni izdelek je, kot je bilo določeno v prvotni preiskavi, folija iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, ki je navadno prijavljen pod oznakama KN ex39206219 in ex39206290.
Given the existence of the large number of different product presentations (product types), and for the purpose of facilitating the monitoring of the undertakings, the products were grouped under different categories (groupings) based on technical characteristics.
Glede na veliko število različnih ponudb izdelka („vrste izdelka“) in zaradi lažjega nadzora zavez so bili izdelki razdeljeni v različne kategorije („skupine“) po tehničnih lastnostih.
These groupings served as the basis for establishing the minimum import prices (MIPs) set out in the undertakings.
Te skupine so bile podlaga za minimalne uvozne cene („MUC“), določene v zavezah.
In the original investigation, the number of MIPs established on the basis of those groupings ranged from 10 to 32 per exporter.
V prvotni preiskavi se je število MUC, določenih na podlagi teh skupin, gibalo od 10 do 32 na izvoznika.
In the framework of the current review, a comparison was made, within groupings, of the mix of model types and of price variations between the investigation period used in the original investigation (original IP) and the current IP.
V okviru sedanjega pregleda je bila za vsako skupino narejena primerjava med mešanico vrst izdelka in cenami iz preiskovalnega obdobja, določenega za prvotno preiskavo („prvotni OP“), ter cenami iz sedanjega OP.
The analysis showed that the mix of model types sold under certain product groupings have changed since the acceptance of the undertakings.
Analiza je pokazala, da se je mešanica vrst izdelka, prodanih v okviru določenih skupin izdelka, od sprejetja zavez spremenila.
For several companies under investigation these changes have been very significant, to the extent that for some groupings most of the product presentations exported to the Community during the IP no longer correspond to the products exported during the original IP.
Za nekatere družbe v preiskavi so bile te spremembe tako velike, da v primeru nekaterih skupin večina vrst izdelkov, izvoženih v Skupnost med OP, ne ustreza več izdelkom, izvoženim med prvotnim OP.
Examples of changes which were noted within groupings were the dropping of lower value products, the addition of new apparently higher value products, and sometimes a combination of both of these.
Nekatere spremembe, opažene v skupinah, so bile opustitev izdelkov z majhno vrednostjo, vključitev novih izdelkov z občutno višjo vrednostjo in v nekaterih primerih kombinacija obojega.
The analysis also showed that for certain product groupings the price variance (the range of product values) within the grouping has changed significantly since the acceptance of the undertakings.
Analiza je pokazala tudi, da so se znotraj posameznih skupin izdelka razlike v cenah (paleta vrednosti izdelka) od sprejetja zavez občutno spremenile.
In this context it should also be noted that there has been a significant change in the pattern of sales between the different product groupings following the acceptance of undertakings.
V tem smislu je treba tudi omeniti, da je po sprejetju zavez prišlo do občutne spremembe v vzorcu prodaj med različnimi skupinami izdelka.
In particular, there appears to have been a tendency to concentrate sales on those groupings with a lower minimum price.
Zlasti se zdi, da obstaja težnja po koncentraciji prodaj na tiste skupine, ki imajo nižjo minimalno ceno.
Since the MIPs and the undertakings were established on the basis of the mix of product types and their corresponding values within the product groupings during the original IP, it is clear that the changes found in relation to the actual mix of products and values within those product groupings have rendered those specific MIPs, and therefore the undertakings, inappropriate to counteract the injurious effect of dumping.
Glede na to, da so bile MUC in zaveze določene na podlagi mešanice vrst izdelka in njihovih ustreznih vrednosti znotraj vsake skupine med prvotnim OP, je jasno, da so spremembe, ugotovljene v zvezi z dejansko mešanico izdelkov in vrednosti znotraj teh skupin izdelka povzročile, da so ti določeni MUC in posledično zaveze neustrezni za preprečevanje škodljivih učinkov dampinga.
Request regarding countervailing measures
Zahtevek glede izravnalnih ukrepov
As regards the review limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by Polyplex, the analysis showed that the corporate structure of that company would render monitoring of an undertaking complex, thus making an undertaking inappropriate as a form of effective countervailing measure.
Glede pregleda, omejenega na proučitev sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudil Polyplex, je analiza pokazala, da bi bil nadzor zaveze zaradi strukture te družbe zapleten, kar bi pomenilo, da bi bila zaveza kot oblika učinkovitega izravnalnega ukrepa neustrezna.
The complexity arises from the fact that the product concerned is also manufactured by a related company of Polyplex in a third country (Thailand), which creates a risk of cross-compensation of prices should the company in Thailand also export the product concerned to the Community.
Zapletenost nadzornega postopka izhaja iz dejstva, da zadevni izdelek proizvaja tudi povezana družba Polyplex v tretji državi (Tajska), kar ustvarja tveganje za križno kompenzacijo cen, če bi tudi tajska družba izvažala zadevni izdelek v Skupnost.
Monitoring and therefore enforcement would be too difficult to guarantee a proper functioning of the undertaking.
Nadzor zaveze in posledično njeno izvrševanje bi bila prezahtevna, da bi lahko zagotovila pravilno delovanje te zaveze.
The undertakings as they are, with MIPs based on groups of products, permit a large degree of flexibility for the exporters to change the technical characteristics of the products within the group.
Sedanje zaveze, katerih MUC temelji na skupinah izdelkov, omogočajo izvoznikom visoko stopnjo prožnosti pri spreminjanju tehničnih lastnosti izdelkov znotraj posamezne skupine.
The product concerned comprises numerous and evolving differentiating features, which largely determine sales prices.
Zadevni izdelek združuje številne razločevalne lastnosti, ki se razvijajo in ki v veliki meri določajo prodajne cene.
Changes in those features consequently have a significant impact on prices.
Zato spremembe teh lastnosti pomembno vplivajo na cene.