natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The undertakings participated in the infringement during at least the following periods:
Podjetja so pri kršitvah sodelovala najmanj v obdobjih, navedenih v nadaljevanju:
Alfa Acciai SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 4 July 2000;
Alfa Acciali S.p.A., od 6. decembra 1989 do 4. julija 2000;
Feralpi Siderurgica SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
Feralpi Siderurgica S.p.A. od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Ferriere Nord SpA, from 1 April 1993 to 4 July 2000;
Ferriere Nord S.p.A. od 1. aprila 1993 do 4. julija 2000;
IRO Industrie Riunite Odolesi SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
IRO Industrie Riunite Odolesi S.p.A. od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Leali SpA and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA (in liquidation), from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
Leali S.p.A. ter Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi S.p.A. v likvidaciji od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Lucchini SpA/Siderpotenza SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
Lucchini SpA/Siderpotenza S.p.A. od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Riva SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
Riva S.p.A. od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA, from 6 December 1989 to 27 June 2000;
Ferriera Valsabbia S.p.A. in Valsabbia Investimenti S.p.A. od 6. decembra 1989 do 27. junija 2000;
Federacciai (Federazione delle Imprese Siderurgiche Italiane), from 6 December 1989 to 24 July 1998.
Federacciai, Federazione delle Imprese Siderurgiche Italiane od 6. decembra 1989 do 24. julija 1998.
The market for reinforcing bars
Trg jekla za armiranje betona
Reinforcing bars are a long hot-rolled steel product in coils or bars of 5 mm and over, with a smooth, crenellated or ribbed surface, used to reinforce concrete.
Jeklo za armiranje betona je dolg, vroče valjan izdelek iz jekla, v zvitkih oziroma 5 ali več milimetrskih palicah, z gladko, luskasto ali rebrasto površino, za armiranje betona. Jeklo za armiranje betona se običajno dobavlja v obliki ravnih palic (vroče valjanih na valjčni progi).
The conventional form in which reinforcing bars are supplied is straight reinforcing bar that has been hot-rolled in a bar mill. The bars may be 12 m, 6 m, 14 m or, more rarely, 18 m long.
Palice lahko merijo 12, 6, 14 in, poredkoma, 18 metrov.
Reinforcing bar in coils takes the form of superimposed coil, which the user straightens and cuts to the desired length.
Jeklo za armiranje betona v obliki valjanih žic je v obliki zvitka/navitja, ki ga uporabnik naravna in odreže želeno dolžino.
It usually costs slightly more than the straight bar form but the price nevertheless tends to fall into line with that of straight bars.
Cena jekla za armiranje v zvitkih, ki je običajno nekoliko dražji od jekla za armiranje v palicah, teži k prilagajanju ceni slednjega.
All these types of reinforcing bar are manufactured in circular cross sections of 5 mm to 40 mm, to be used in structures with different requirements.
Vse navedene vrste jekla za armiranje betona se izdelujejo s krožnim prerezom različnih premerov, ki, odvisno od potreb strukturalne uporabe, znašajo od 5 do 40 mm.
Reinforcing bar in coil does not exceed a diameter of 16 mm. On top of the base price for reinforcing bars there is a supplement to be paid depending on the diameter, which is known as a ‘size extra’.
Jeklo za armiranje betona v zvitkih ne presega premera 16 mm. Z velikostjo premera je povezana določitev cene (tako imenovani „pribitek na dimenzijo“), ki se doda osnovni ceni jekla za armiranje betona.
Reinforcing bar is used principally in the construction industry to strengthen concrete.
Jeklo za armiranje betona se primarno uporablja na področju gradbeništva za ojačitev zgradb.
Of the fifteen Member States of the European Union, the country in which the largest volume of reinforcing bar is manufactured is Italy.
Največja količina jekla za armiranje betona v petnajstih državah članicah Evropske skupnosti se proizvede v Italiji.
Turnover for reinforcing bar achieved by the addressees of this Decision, which, towards the end of the infringement period, accounted for some 80 % of the Italian market, totalled some EUR 900 million in 2000-01.
Promet, ustvarjen z jeklom za armiranje betona v podjetjih, naslovnikih te odločbe, ki so proti koncu obdobja kršitve predstavljala 80 % italijanskega trga, je v letih 2000-2001 znašal okrog 900 milijonov evrov.
From at least the end of 1989 Federacciai and the other firms cooperating with it decided on and applied standard size extras for reinforcing bar in Italy.
Podjetje Federacciai in ostala podjetja, ki so z njim sodelovala, so vsaj od konca leta 1989 določala in izvajala enotno določanje cen „pribitka na dimenzijo“ jekla za armiranje betona v Italiji.
From April 1992 the firms, with the support of Federacciai, extended their decisions and behaviour to cover the base price for reinforcing bar in Italy.
Od aprila 1992 so podjetja ob podpori družbe Federacciai svoje odločitve in ravnanje razširila na določitev osnovne cene jekla za armiranje betona v Italiji.
From that date until September 1995 the agreement extended to the fixing of payment terms.
Od istega datuma pa do konca septembra 1995 se je dogovor razširil še na določitev plačilnih rokov.
From at least the end of 1994 Federacciai structured its business activities more systematically, as regards both the prices and quantities of reinforcing bar produced and sold.
Vsaj od konca leta 1994 je družba Federacciai svojo organizacisjko dejavnost zasnovala bolj sistematično, tako glede cen kot proizvedenih in prodanih količin jekla za armiranje betona.
From 1995 the parties to the agreement started colluding on reducing or controlling output or sales in order to reduce the quantities of reinforcing bar on the market.
Od leta 1995 so se soudeleženci dogovora pričeli dogovarjati o zmanjšanju oziroma nadzoru proizvodnje in prodaje z namenom zmanjšati količino jekla za armiranje betona, danega na trg.
Some of them set up a more detailed and systematic system of multilateral mutual control of quantities produced and sold by each firm.
Nekatere družbe proizvajalke so pričele izvajati bolj natančen in bolj sistematičen večstranski vzajemni kontrolni sistem količin, ki jih je proizvedlo in prodalo vsako posamično podjetje.
The Commission does not have sufficient evidence to show that the competition rules were infringed in the period after 4 July 2000.
Komisija ne razpolaga z zadostnim številom podatkov, da bi lahko dokazala obstoj kršitve pravil konkurence za obdobje po 4. juliju 2000.
It is pointed out that not all the firms necessarily took part in all the behaviour described here and that some of them took part for a shorter time.
Potrebno je pojasniti, da vse družbe niso nujno sodelovale pri vseh sedaj opisanih ravnanjih in da so nekatera podjetja pri tem sodelovala krajši čas.
The infringement consists in a single, complex and continuous restrictive practice which, having as its object the fixing of prices and the limiting or controlling of production or sales, constitutes a very serious infringement of Article 65(1) of the ECSC Treaty.
Kršitev sestavlja enoten, kompleksen in kontinuiran dogovor o določitvi cen in omejitvi oziroma nadzoru proizvodnje in prodaje, ki po svoji naravi predstavljajo zelo hudo kršitev odstavka 1 člena 65 Pogodbe ESPJ.
The cartel covered the whole of Italy.
Kartel se je raztezal po celotnem ozemlju Italijanske republike.
The cartel arrangements were put into practice and had effects on the market, although the hoped-for effects were not always fully achieved.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so se dogovori kartela uresničevali v praksi in da so vplivali na trg, čeprav želeni učinki niso bili vselej doseženi.
The Commission considers therefore that the addressees committed a very serious infringement.
Komisija zatorej meni, da so naslovniki zagrešili zelo hudo kršitev.
The fact that the restrictive practice was confined solely to the Italian market does not mean that the gravity of the infringement can be regarded as serious rather than very serious, since account must be taken of the volume of Italian production.
Omejitev veljavnosti dogovora zgolj na italijanski trg ne dovoljuje, da bi se kršitev zmanjšala z zelo hude na hudo, saj je potrebno upoštevati tudi pomembnost italijanske proizvodnje.
However, without prejudice to the very serious nature of the infringement, The Commission has, in determining the basic amount of the fine, taken account of the specific characteristics of the case, involving a national market that was subject at the time to the rules of the ECSC Treaty and on which the firms in question accounted for a limited share of the relevant market during the first period of the infringement.
Vendar pa, brez vpliva na škodo zaradi zelo hudega značaja kršitve, je Komisija pri določitvi osnovnega zneska denarne kazni upoštevala specifične lastnosti tega primera, ki zadeva nacionalni trg, na katerem so v tistem obdobju veljali predpisi iz Pogodbe ESPJ, in v katerem so družbe naslovnice v prvem obdobju kršitve predstavljale omejeni del zadevnega trga.
Pursuant to Article 65(5) of the ECSC Treaty, an association of undertakings cannot be made the subject of a fine or periodic penalty payment.
V skladu z odstavkom 5 člena 65 Pogodbe ESPJ združenju podjetij ni mogoče izreči globe ali periodične denarne kazni.
However, there is nothing in the wording of Article 65(1) to support the view that an association which has adopted a decision tending to prevent, restrict or distort normal competition is not itself covered by the prohibition laid down in that provision.
Vendar pa besedilo člena 65, št. 1, v nobenem delu ne dopušča mnenja, da prepoved iz imenovane določbe ne velja tudi za sklepe združenj podjetij, katerih namen ali učinek so preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence.
Accordingly, whilst Federacciai cannot be fined for the above-mentioned anti-competitive behaviour, it is an addressee of this Decision.
Zato je Federacciai, kljub temu, da ji za prej navedeno protikonkurenčno delovanje ni bila naložena nikakršna denarna kazen, naslovnica te odločbe.
Differential treatment
Razlike v obravnavanju
Within the category of very serious infringements, the scale of fines applicable makes it possible to treat firms differently in order to take account of the effective economic capacity of the offenders to impair competition significantly, as well as to set the fine at a level that ensures sufficient deterrence.
Lestvica denarnih kazni v kategoriji zelo hudih kršitev dovoljuje razlike v obravnavanju podjetij, tako da je mogoče upoštevati, koliko so storilci kršitev dejansko ekonomsko zmožni občutno prizadeti konkurenco, prav tako pa je mogoče določiti denarno kazen, ki bo imela zadosten opozorilni učinek.
The Commission considers that the market shares acquired by the addressees of this Decision in the last full calendar year of the infringement (1999) are not representative of their actual presence on the relevant market in the reference period.
Komisija meni, da tržni delež, ki so ga naslovnice te odločbe dosegle v celotnem zadnjem letu kršitve (leto 1999), ni reprezentativni delež njihove dejanske prisotnosti na trgu, bistvenem v obdobju, na katerega se odločba sklicuje.
Between 1990 and 1999 the market shares of the firms virtually tripled.
Med leti 1990 in 1999 so se omenjeni tržni deleži teh podjetij praktično potrojili.
On the basis of the average market shares in the period 1990-99, it is possible to identify three groups of firms in descending order of presence on the market.
Na podlagi povprečnega tržnega deleža v obdobju 1990-1999 lahko torej določimo tri skupine podjetij v padajočem vrstnem redu glede na tržni delež. V prvi skupini sta podjetji Feralpi in Valsabbia.
As regards Riva and Lucchini/Siderpotenza, the basic amount of the fine calculated in relation to the relative size of the relevant market must be increased in order to take account of the size and global resources of the firms.
Pri podjetjih Riva in Lucchini/Siderpotenza je potrebno povišati osnovni znesek denarne kazne, ki se izračuna na podlagi ustreznega tržnega pomena, pomembnega pri upoštevanju velikost in globalnih virov imenovanega podjetja.
The turnover in ECSC products achieved by these firms is very much higher (some EUR 3,5 billion for Riva in 2001 and about EUR 1,2 billion for Lucchini) than that of the other firms involved.
Promet, ki so ga imenovana podjetja ustvarila z izdelki ESPJ, je veliko večji (približno 3,5 milijard evrov za Rivo v letu 2001 in približno 1,2 milijarde za družbo Lucchini) od prometa drugih podjetij, vpletenih v ta primer.
It should also be pointed out how the documents in the case show that, on many occasions, the heads of these firms were directly involved in the infringements objected to.
Poleg tega je potrebno spomniti, tako kot je mogoče sklepati iz spisa, da so bili ob številnih priložnostih vrhovi teh podjetij neposredno vpleteni pri izpodbijanih kršitvah.
In order to ensure a level of sufficient deterrence, the basic amount of the fine should be increased by 225 % in the case of Lucchini/Siderpotenza because its turnover in ECSC products is some three times greater than that of the larger of the other firms and by 375 % in the case of Riva, which has a total turnover in ECSC products that is about three times higher than that of Lucchini/Siderpotenza.
Da bi dosegli zadosten opozorilni učinek, je potrebno osnovni znesek denarne kazni povišati za 225 % v primeru družbe Lucchini/Siderpotenza, torej za vrednost, za kolikor je promet izdelkov ESPJ približno trikrat višji od prometa nejvečje izmed ostalih podjetij ter za 375 % v primeru podjetja Riva, katere globalni promet z izdelki ESPJ je približno trikrat višji od prometa podjetja Lucchini/Siderpotenza.
These multipliers take account of the significant disparity in size and overall resources between the two firms and the other addressees of the Decision.
Ti multiplikatorji upoštevajo znatno neenakost glede dimenzij in globalnih virov med temi dvemi podjetji in drugimi naslovniki te odločbe.
The infringement lasted for more than ten years and six months as regards all the firms with the exception of Ferriere Nord SpA, where the infringement lasted for more than seven years.
Kršitev je torej trajala več kot deset let in šest mesecev, kar ne velja za podjetje Ferriere Nord S.p.A., pri katerem je kršitev trajala več kot sedem let.
The basic amount of the fine is thus increased by 105 % for all the firms, with the exception of Ferriere Nord, where it is increased by 70 %.
Osnovna denarna kazen se zato pri vseh podjetjih poveča za 105 % razen za Ferriere Nord, kjer se poveča za 70 %.
In the present case the Commission has identified only one aggravating circumstance, i.e. the fact that Ferriere Nord has already been the subject of a Commission decision of 2 August 1989 concerning its involvement in an agreement to fix prices and limit sales in the welded steel mesh sector.
V tem primeru je Komisija ugotovila samo eno oteževalno okoliščino v recidivnem ravnanju podjetja Ferriere Nord, ki je že bilo naslovnik odločbe Komisije z dne 2. avgusta 1989 zaradi sodelovanja pri dogovoru o določitvi cen in omejevanju prodaje na področju elektrovarjene mreže.
The Commission therefore considers it necessary to impose an increase of 50 % of the basic amount in respect of Ferriere Nord.
Komisija zato meni, da je podjetju Ferrerie Nord potrebno naložiti osnovno globo, povečano za 50 %.
The Commission has not identified any attenuating circumstances.
Komisija ni ugotovila nobene olajševalne okoliščine.
Application of the 1996 leniency notice
Izvajanje obvestila o naklonjenem obravnavanju iz leta 1996
None of the firms to which the Decision is addressed qualifies for the non-imposition of, or a substantial or significant reduction in, the fine pursuant to points B and C of the 1996 Leniency Notice as none of the conditions provided for therein have been met.
Nobenemu izmed podjetij, na katera je naslovljena ta odločba, se ne prizna oprostitev plačila denarne kazni, znatno ali pomembno zmanjšanje denarne kazni v skladu z določili iz točk B in C obvestila o odpustitivi iz leta 1996, saj ni bil izpolnjen nobeden izmed tam navedenih zahtevanih pogojev.
None of the firms disclosed the cartel either before or after the Commission started its investigation or provided any decisive evidence of the existence of the restrictive practice.
Pred pričetkom pregleda pa tudi ne po samem pregledu nobeno izmed podjetij Komisiji ni razkrilo dogovora, ravno tako podjetja niso predložila nobenega odločilnega ali dokaznega elementa za dokazovanje obstoja dogovora.
With regard to point D of the 1996 Notice, the Commission acknowledges that Ferriere Nord provided it with useful information that allowed it to gain a better understanding of the details of the restrictive practice.
Glede točke D obvestila iz leta 1996 pa Komisija priznava, da je podjetje Ferriere Nord predložilo koristne podatke, ki so Komisiji omogočili boljše razumevanje dogovora.
It considers that this satisfies the first paragraph of point D of the Notice, which states that a reduction in the amount of a fine is possible if, before a statement of objections is sent, an enterprise provides the Commission with information, documents or other evidence which materially contribute to establishing the existence of the infringement.
Komisija meni, da so s tem izpolnjeni pogoji iz prvega odstavka točke D sporočila, ki navaja, da je možno zmanjšanje globe v primeru ko podjetje še pred prejemom obvestila o obdolžitvi Komisiji posreduje informacije, dokumente oziroma druge dokazne elemente, ki bi pripomogli k potrditvi obstoja kršitve.
The Commission considers that it would be justified to grant Ferriere Nord a reduction of 20 % in the amount of the fine.
Komisija meni, da se podjetju Ferrerie Nord upravičeno dodeli 20 % zmanjšanje zneska denarne kazni.
The following fines are imposed:
Odmerijo se naslednje denarne kazni:
[4]— Feralpi Siderurgica SpA.:
[4]– Feralpi Siderurgica S.p.A.
EUR 10,25 million,
10,25 milijonov evrov
Valsabbia Investimenti SpA and Ferriera Valsabbia SpA, jointly and severally liable:
Valsabbia Investimenti S.p.A. in Ferriera Valsabbia S.p.A., solidarno,
Lucchini SpA and Siderpotenza SpA, jointly and severally liable:
Lucchini S.p.A. in Siderpotenza S.p.A., solidarno
EUR 16,14 million,
16,14 milijonov evrov
EUR 7,175 million,
7,175 milijonov evrov
EUR 26,9 million,
26,9 milijonov evrov
Leali SpA and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA in liquidazione (in liquidation), jointly and severally liable:
Leali S.p.A. ter Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi S.p.A. in liquidazione, solidarno
EUR 6,093 million,
6,093 milijonov evrov
EUR 1,082 million,
1,082 milijonov evrov
IRO Industrie Riunite Odolesi SpA:
IRO Industrie Riunite Odolesi S.p.A.,
EUR 3,58 million,
3,58 milijonov evrov
EUR 3,57 million,
3,57 milijonov evrov
Federacciai and the firms listed must forthwith put an end to the infringement if they have not already done so.
Federacciai in našteta podjetja nemudoma, če tega niso že storila, prenehajo s kršitvami.
They must refrain from repeating the acts or behaviour that constituted the infringement and from adopting measures having equivalent effect.
Podjetja ne bodo ponovila dejanj ali ravnanja, enakih kršitvam, ki so bile ugotovljene v obravnavanem primeru oziroma ne bodo sprejemala ukrepov z enakim predmetom ali učinkom.
OJ C 45, 19.2.2002, p. 3.
UL C 45, 19.2.2002, str. 3.
A distinction should be made between the behaviour of Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA until it entered into liquidation and the behaviour of Leali SpA from the date it was set up: the former can be attributed jointly and severally to Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA (in liquidation) and to Leali SpA, the latter solely to Leali SpA.
Potrebno je ločiti ravnanje podjetja Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi S.p.A. do likvidacije tega podjetja od ravnanja, ki ga je izvajala družba Leali S.p.A. od svoje ustanovitve: za prvo ravnanje sta solidarno obtoženi podjetji Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi S.p.A. v likvidaciji ter Leali S.p.A., drugega ravnanja pa je obtožena izključno družba Leali S.p.A.
The amount of the fine is accordingly subdivided into two periods, in proportion first to the period from the start of the infringement to 25 November 1998 and second from that date to the end of the infringement.
Višina denarne kazni je bila zatorej, sorazmerno z dobo, razdeljena na dve obdobji, kjer je prvo obdobje potekalo od začetka kršitve do 25. novembra 1998, drugo pa od tega datuma do prenehanja kršitve.
The amount of the fine relating to the first period is imposed on Leali SpA and Acciaierei e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA (in liquidation), jointly and severally, while that relating to the second period is imposed solely on Leali SpA.
Višina denarne kazni, ki zadeva prvo obdobje, se pripiše podjetjem Leali S.p.A. in Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi S.p.A. v likvidaciji, solidarno, denarna kazen za drugo obdobje pa samo družbi Leali SpA.
In the first group are Feralpi and Valsabbia, and in the second Lucchini/Siderpotenza, Alfa, Riva and Leali (with an average market share of some 70 % of that of the firms in the first group).
V drugi skupini Lucchini/Siderpotenza, Alfa, Riva in Leali (s povprečnim tržnim deležem, ki znaša skoraj 70 % tržnega deleža prve skupine).
In the third group are IRO and Ferriere Nord (with an average market share of some 35 % of that of the firms in the first group).
V tretji skupini se nahajajo Iro in Ferriere Nord (s povprečnim tržnim deležem, ki znaša skoraj 35 % tržnega deleža podjetij iz prve skupine).
Decision No 895/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
Odločba št. 895/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories
o uvedbi poenostavljenega režima kontrole oseb na zunanjih mejah na podlagi enostranskega priznanja določenih listin s strani Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške kot enakovrednih njihovim nacionalnim vizumom za namene tranzita prek njihovih ozemelj
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 62(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 62(2) Pogodbe,
Pursuant to Article 3(1) of the 2003 Act of Accession, the Member States which acceded to the Union on 1 May 2004 are required from that date to subject to a visa obligation nationals of the third countries listed in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those nationals who are exempt from that requirement [2].
V skladu s členom 3(1) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003 morajo države članice, ki so 1. maja 2004 pristopile k Uniji, od tega dne za državljane tretjih držav, ki so naštete v Prilogi I k Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 539/2001 z dne 15. marca 2001 o tretjih državah, katerih državljani morajo imeti ob prehodu zunanjih meja vizum, in tretjih državah, katerih državljani so izvzeti iz vizumske obveznosti [2], zahtevati vizume.
Pursuant to Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, the provisions of the Schengen acquis on the conditions and criteria for issuing short-term uniform visas, as well as the provisions on mutual recognition of visas and on the equivalence between residence permits and visas, only apply in the new Member States after adoption of a Council decision to that effect.
V skladu s členom 3(2) Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003 se določbe schengenskega pravnega reda o pogojih in merilih za izdajo enotnih vizumov za kratkoročno bivanje ter določbe o vzajemnem priznavanju vizumov ter enakovrednosti dovoljenj za prebivanje in vizumov v novih državah članicah uporabljajo šele po sprejetju sklepa Sveta glede teh vprašanj.
However, they are binding on those Member States from the date of accession.
Vendar pa so za te države članice zavezujoče od dne pristopa.