natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Four exporting producers having obtained individual treatment indicated that would offer a price undertaking but failed to submit a sufficiently substantiated undertaking offer within the deadlines set in Article 8(2) of the basic Regulation.
Štirje proizvajalci izvozniki, ki jim je bila odobrena individualna obravnava, so ponudili, da se bodo zavezali glede cen, vendar niso predložili dovolj utemeljene ponudbe o zavezi v okviru roka, določenega v členu 8(2) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently no undertaking offers could be accepted by the Commission.
Zato Komisija ni mogla sprejeti nobene ponudbe o zavezi.
Nevertheless, the Council in view of the complexity of the issue for the economic operators in question (predominantly small and medium-sized enterprises) and given that the definitive disclosure was not preceded by a provisional disclosure, considers that they should exceptionally be allowed to complete their undertaking offers beyond the above-mentioned deadline.
Glede na kompleksnost tega vprašanja za zadevne gospodarske subjekte (pretežno mala in srednja podjetja) in dejstvo, da do dokončnega razkritja ni prišlo pred začasnim razkritjem, Svet meni, da bi morali izjemoma dovoliti, da ti proizvajalci dopolnijo svoje ponudbe o zavezi po preteku zgoraj omenjenega roka.
The Chinese authorities also requested that consideration be given to finding a comparable solution for the numerous cooperating Chinese exporting producers concerned by the proceeding, as for the four exporting producers mentioned in the previous recital.
Kitajski organi so tudi zahtevali, da je treba poiskati rešitev za številne zadevne sodelujoče kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki je primerljiva z rešitvijo za štiri proizvajalce izvoznike, omenjene v prejšnji uvodni izjavi.
Should it be found, following discussion to that end, that a change in the form of the measures other than the acceptance of undertakings, is appropriate an interim review will be carried out as expeditiously as possible,
Če bi se v okviru tozadevne razprave ugotovilo, da je, razen sprejetja zavez, sprememba oblike ukrepov ustrezna, se bo kolikor je mogoče hitro izvedel vmesni pregled –
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of castings of non-malleable cast iron of a kind used to cover and/or to give access to ground or sub-surface systems, and parts thereof, whether or not machined, coated or painted or fitted with other materials, excluding fire hydrants, originating in the People's Republic of China, currently classifiable within CN codes 73251050, 73251092 and ex73251099 (Taric code 7325109910).
Uvede se dokončna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz ulitkov iz netempranega litega železa, ki se uporabljajo za pokritje in/ali dostop do površinskih ali podpovršinskih sistemov in njihovih delov, strojno ali ročno obdelani, premazani ali prevlečeni ali drugače obdelani z materialom, razen požarnih hidrantov, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, trenutno uvrščenih pod oznake KN 73251050, 73251092 in ex73251099 (oznaka Taric 7325109910).
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, for products described in paragraph 1 and produced in the People's Republic of China by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja dokončne protidampnške dajatve, ki velja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, neocarinjeno, za izdelke, opisane v odstavku 1, in ki jih spodaj navedene družbe proizvajajo v Ljudski republiki Kitajski, je:
Hebei Province, 051430, PRC
Hebei Province, 051430 LRK
Yingtian Township, Shaoshan, Hunan, PRC
Yingtian Township, Shaoshan, Hunan, LRK
Beizhangzhuang Town, Handan County, Hebei, PRC
Beizhangzhuang Town, Handan County, Hebei, LRK
Jiaocheng County, Shanxi Province, PRC
Jiaocheng County, Shanxi Province, LRK
Jinghai District, 301617 Tianjin, PRC
Jinghai District, 301617 Tianjin, LRK
No. 8 DiZangAn, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030002, PRC
8 DiZangAn, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030002, LRK
062159, Hebei Province, PRC
062159, Hebei Province, LRK
073100, PRC
073100, LRK
Taiyuan main street, Yi County, Hebei Province, 074200, PRC
Taiyuan main street, Yi County, Hebei Province, 074200, LRK
Laiwu City, Shandong Province, 271114, PRC
Laiwu City, Shandong Province, 271114, LRK.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004, OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 461/2004 (UL L 77, 13.3.2004, str. 12).
OJ C 104, 30.4.2004, p. 62.
UL C 104, 30.4.2004, str. 62.
One company supporting the complaint withdrew its support immediately after initiation. Consequently, these three companies were not included in the definition of Community industry.
Ena družba, ki podpira pritožbo, je svojo podporo umaknila takoj po začetku preiskave in posledično te tri družbe niso bile vključene v opredelitev industrije Skupnosti.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1213/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1213/2005
to Commission Regulation of 28 July 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 28. julija 2005 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1214/2005
correcting the Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish versions of Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 concerning production refunds in the cereals sector
o popravku estonske, finske, grške, italijanske, latvijske, litovske, nizozemske, portugalske, španske in švedske različice Uredbe (EGS) št. 1722/93 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1766/92 o proizvodnih nadomestilih v sektorju žit
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals [1], and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1784/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupni ureditvi trga za žita [1] in zlasti člena 8(3) Uredbe,
An error appears in the Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish versions of the text of the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 9(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93 [2], as amended by Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1548/2004.
Estonska, finska, grška, italijanska, latvijska, litovska, nizozemska, portugalska, španska in švedska različica v besedilu drugega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 9(2) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 1722/93 [2], kot je bila spremenjena s členom 1(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1548/2004, vsebujejo napako.
In order to avoid any incorrect interpretations and to ensure the correct application of the measures provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 1722/93, that error should be corrected.
Da se prepreči napačno tolmačenje in zagotovi pravilna uporaba ukrepov, predvidenih v Uredbi (EGS) št. 1722/93, je treba navedeno napako popraviti.
As this correction does not have any disadvantageous or discriminatory consequences for some producers in favour of others, it should be made applicable from the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1548/2004.
Ker ta popravek nima nikakršnih škodljivih ali razlikovalnih posledic za nekatere proizvajalce v korist drugih, ga je treba uporabljati od datuma začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1548/2004.
Concerns only the Dutch, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish versions.
Velja samo za estonsko, finsko, grško, italijansko, latvijsko, litovsko, nizozemsko, portugalsko, špansko in švedsko različico.
It shall apply as from 3 September 2004.
Uporablja se od 3. septembra 2004.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1215/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1215/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 1990/2004 laying down transitional measures in the wine sector by reason of the accession of Hungary to the European Union
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1990/2004 o določitvi prehodnih ukrepov na vinogradniško-vinarskem področju zaradi pristopa Madžarske k Evropski uniji
Article 27(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine [1] lays down that any natural or legal person or group of persons having made wine is required to deliver for distillation all the by-products of that winemaking.
Člen 27(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino [1] določa, da morajo vse fizične ali pravne osebe ali skupine oseb, ki proizvajajo vino, dobaviti v destilacijo vse stranske proizvode, ki nastanejo pri proizvodnji vina.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1623/2000 of 25 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine with regard to market mechanisms [2] establishes the rules applicable to such distillation and Article 49 thereof provides for certain exceptions to that obligation.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1623/2000 z dne 25. julija 2000 o določitvi podrobnih izvedbenih pravil za Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino ob upoštevanju tržnih mehanizmov [2] določa pravila uporabe te obveznosti destilacije, v členu 49 pa tudi nekatere možne izjeme.
Hungary has adopted the measures needed to implement this distillation obligation, but there has been a delay in the construction of new distilleries to process the by-products of winemaking.
Madžarska je sprejela potrebne ukrepe za uporabo te obveznosti destilacije, vendar pa je prišlo do zamude pri izgradnji novih destilarn, primernih za obdelavo stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina.
Consequently, part of the by-products of the 2004/05 wine year will be distilled in 2005/06.
Destilacija stranskih proizvodov vinskega leta 2004/2005 se bo zato delno izvršila v letu 2005/2006.
Nevertheless, existing capacity is not yet sufficient to distil all the by-products of both wine years simultaneously.
Vendar pa zmogljivosti trenutno ne zadostujejo za hkratno destilacijo vseh stranskih proizvodov iz obeh vinskih let.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1990/2004 [3] authorises Hungary to exempt certain categories of producers from the obligation to distil by-products of wine-making for the 2004/05 wine year.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1990/2004 [3] je dovolila Madžarski, da nekatere kategorije proizvajalcev izključi iz obveznosti destilacije stranskih proizvodov pri proizvodnji vina za vinsko leto 2004/2005.
In view of the situation described above, that authorisation should be extended to the 2005/06 marketing year.
Glede na zgoraj opisani položaj je treba to dovoljenje podaljšati na vinsko leto 2005/2006.
Regulation (EC) No 1990/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1990/2004 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1990/2004, ‘for the 2004/2005 marketing year’ is hereby replaced by ‘for the 2004/2005 and 2005/06 marketing years’.
V členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1990/2004 se besedilo „za vinsko leto 2004/2005“ zamenja z besedilom „za vinski leti 2004/2005 in 2005/2006“.
OJ L 344, 20.11.2004, p. 8.
UL L 344, 20.11.2004, str. 8.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1216/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1216/2005
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine [1], and in particular Article 80(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino [1], in zlasti točke (b) člena 80 Uredbe,
Several Member States are having serious difficulties applying the provisions of Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 concerning the regularisation of illegal plantation.
Več držav članic ima velike težave pri uporabi določb iz člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 v zvezi s postopkom odobritve nezakonito zasajenih vinogradov.
These difficulties concern, in particular, the date from which the procedure in question is to commence.
Te težave se nanašajo zlasti na datum, s katerim se mora začeti izvajati ta postopek.
Applying the various provisions regarding the grant of the derogation imposes a serious and complex administrative burden, particularly as regards checks and penalties.
Uporaba različnih določb v zvezi z odobritvijo odstopanja zahteva pomembne in zapletene upravne stroške, zlasti glede nadzora in sankcij.
To overcome these difficulties, the provisions on the regularisation of illegal plantation need to be amended.
Za odpravo teh težav je potrebna sprememba določb, predvidenih za odobritev nezakonito zasajenih vinogradov.
Pending the submission of an appropriate proposal to the Council and in the interests of sound administration, the date for the closure of the procedure laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 [2] should therefore be postponed definitively to 31 December 2007.
V pričakovanju ustreznega predloga Svetu in v interesu dobrega upravljanja teh upravnih stroškov je treba v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1227/2000 [2] rok tega postopka dokončno prestaviti na 31. december 2007.
Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1227/2000 je zato treba spremeniti.
Article 2(1a) of Regulation (EC) No 1227/2000 is hereby replaced by the following:
V členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 1227/2000 se odstavek 1a nadomesti z:
The deadline laid down in Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 shall be postponed to 31 December 2007.’
Rok iz člena 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 se prestavi na 31. december 2007.“
It shall apply from 1 August 2005.
Uporablja se od 1. avgusta 2005.
Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1074/2005 (OJ L 175, 8.7.2005, p. 12).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1074/2005 (UL L 175, 8.7.2005, str. 12).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1217/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1217/2005
of 28 July 2005
z dne 28 julija 2005
laying down detailed rules for the application of a tariff quota for certain live bovine animals originating in Bulgaria, provided for in Council Decision 2003/286/EC
o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo tarifnih kvot za nekatero živo govedo s poreklom iz Bolgarije, kot določa Sklep Sveta 2003/286/ES
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal [1], and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 32(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1254/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso [1] in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 32(1) Uredbe,
Council Decision 2003/286/EC of 8 April 2003 on the conclusion of a Protocol adjusting the trade aspects of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bulgaria, of the other part, to take account of the outcome of negotiations between the Parties on new mutual agricultural concessions [2], provided for concessions as regards the opening of tariff import quotas of certain live bovine animals originating from Bulgaria.
Sklep Sveta 2003/286/ES z dne 8. aprila 2003 o sklenitvi protokola o prilagoditvi trgovinskih vidikov Evropskega sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Bolgarijo na drugi, zaradi upoštevanja rezultatov pogajanj med pogodbenicama o novih vzajemnih kmetijskih koncesijah [2], določa koncesije glede odprtja tarifnih kvot, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz nekaterega živega goveda s poreklom iz Bolgarije.
Council and Commission Decision 2005/430/EC of 18 April 2005 on the conclusion of the Additional Protocol to the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Bulgaria, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union [3] provides for additional concessions as regards imports of certain live bovine animals originating from Bulgaria.
Sklepa Sveta in Komisije 2005/430/ES z dne 18. aprila 2005 o sklenitvi Dodatnega protokola k Evropskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Republiko Bolgarijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji [3] predvideva dodatne koncesije za uvoz nekaterega živega goveda s poreklom iz Bolgarije.
Detailed rules should be adopted for the opening and administration of the tariff quota concerning live bovine animals, on a multi-annual basis beginning on 1 July 2005.
Sprejeti je treba podrobna pravila za odprtje in upravljanje tarifne kvote za živo govedo na večletni osnovi z začetkom 1. julija 2005.
With a view to preventing speculation, the quantities available within the quota should be made accessible to operators able to show that they are genuinely engaged in trade of a significant scale with third countries.
Da bi se preprečile špekulacije, morajo biti razpoložljive količine v okviru kvote dostopne tržnim udeležencem, ki lahko dokažejo, da se dejansko v pomembnem obsegu ukvarjajo s trgovino s tretjimi državami.
In consideration of this and in order to ensure efficient management, the traders concerned should be required to have imported a certain minimum number of animals during the year previous to the annual quota period in question which, at the same time, should guarantee a fair access to the concessions.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega in z namenom zagotoviti učinkovito upravljanje se od zadevnih tržnih udeležencev zahteva, da so v letu pred zadevnim letnim obdobjem kvote uvozili določeno minimalno število živali, kar bi istočasno moralo zagotoviti pravičen dostop do koncesij.
Given that the present concessions only apply to imports of animals from Bulgaria and considering the imports which are carried out from this country, a consignment of 50 animals may be considered to be a normal load.
Ob upoštevanju, da sedanje koncesije veljajo le za uvoz živali iz Bolgarije in ob upoštevanju uvozov, ki se izvedejo iz te države, se pošiljka s 50 živalmi lahko šteje za običajen tovor.
Experience shows that the purchase of a single consignment is a minimum requirement for a transaction to be considered real and viable.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da je nabava ene same pošiljke najmanjša zahteva, da se za posel šteje, da je realen in donosen.
If such criteria are to be checked, applications should be presented in the Member State where the importer is entered in a VAT register.
Če se bodo ta merila preverjala, je treba zahtevke predložiti v državi članici, v kateri je uvoznik vpisan v register zavezancev za plačilo davka na dodano vrednost.
Furthermore, in order to prevent speculation, importers no longer involved in trade in live bovine animals at 1 January previous to the beginning of the annual quota period in question should be denied access to the quota.
Da bi preprečili špekulacije, je treba uvoznikom, ki ne trgujejo več z živim govedom od 1. januarja leta pred začetkom obdobja zadevne letne kvote, zavrniti dostop do kvote.
Moreover, a security relating to import rights should be submitted in the Member States where the operator is entered in the national VAT register.
Poleg tega je treba varščino za uvozne pravice položiti v državah članicah, v katerih je tržni udeleženec vpisan v nacionalni register zavezancev za plačilo davka na dodano vrednost.
Import licences should not be transferable and should be issued to traders solely for the quantities for which they have been allocated import rights.
Uvozna dovoljenja ne smejo biti prenosljiva in morajo biti izdana tržnim udeležencem samo za količine, za katere so jim bile dodeljene uvozne pravice.
To provide a more equal access to the quota while ensuring a commercially viable number of animals per application, maximum and minimum limits should be fixed for the number of animals covered in each application.
Da bi omogočili bolj enakovreden dostop do kvote, obenem pa zagotovili komercialno donosno število živali na zahtevek, je treba določiti največje in najmanjše število živali na zahtevek.
It should be established that import rights are to be allocated after a reflection period and where necessary with a fixed percentage reduction applied.
Treba je določiti, da se uvozne pravice dodelijo po času za presojo in po potrebi z enotnim odstotkom znižanja.
Pursuant to Article 29(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999, the arrangements should be managed using import licences.
V skladu členom 29(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1254/1999 se mora ureditev kvote upravljati na podlagi uvoznih dovoljenj.
To this end, rules should be laid down on the submission of applications and the information to be given on applications and licences, where necessary in addition to or by way of derogation from certain provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1445/95 of 26 June 1995 on rules of application for import and export licences in the beef and veal sector and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2377/80 [4] and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 of 9 June 2000 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products [5].
V ta namen je treba določiti pravila za vlaganje zahtevkov in za podatke, ki jih je treba navesti v zahtevkih in dovoljenjih, po potrebi z dodatkom ali z odstopanjem od določenih določb Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1445/95 z dne 26. junija 1995 o pravilih za uporabo uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj za goveje in telečje meso ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2377/80 [4] in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1291/2000 z dne 9. junija 2000, ki določata skupna podrobna pravila za uporabo sistema uvoznih in izvoznih dovoljenj ter potrdil o vnaprejšnji določitvi za kmetijske proizvode [5].
To oblige operators to apply for import licences for all import rights allocated, it should be established that the application should constitute, with regard to the import rights security, a primary requirement within the meaning of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 of 22 July 1985 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products [6].
Da bi tržne udeležence zavezali, da vložijo zahtevek za uvozna dovoljenja za vse dodeljene uvozne pravice, je treba določiti, da taki zahtevki glede varovanja uvoznih pravic predstavljajo primarno zahtevo v skladu z Direktivo Komisije (EGS) št. 2220/85 z dne 22. julija 1985 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema varščin za kmetijske proizvode [6].
A proper management of the quota also requires that the titular holder of the licence is a genuine importer.
Pravilno upravljanje kvot tudi zahteva, da je imetnik dovoljenja tudi resnični uvoznik.
Presentation of proof of those activities should thus also be a primary requirement with regard to the licence security.
Predložitev dokaza o navedenih dejavnostih mora torej biti primarna zahteva v zvezi z varščino za dovoljenja.
With a view to ensuring a strict statistical control of the animals imported under the quota, the tolerance referred to in Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1291/2000 should not apply.
Da bi zagotovili strog statistični nadzor nad živalmi, ki so uvožene v okviru kvote, se tolerance iz člena 8(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1291/2000 ne sme uporabljati.
6600 live bovine animals weighing not more than 300 kilograms falling within CN codes 01029005, 01029021, 01029029, 01029041 or 01029049 and originating in Bulgaria may be imported into the Community free of duty in each 12-month period as from 1 July 2005.
6600 glav živega goveda s težo do 300 kilogramov, ki se uvršča v oznake KN 01029005, 01029021, 01029029, 01029041 ali 01029049, s poreklom iz Bolgarije, se lahko uvozi v Skupnost brez dajatev v vsakem 12-mesečnem obdobju od 1. julija 2005.