natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, the GOK submits that the Commission’s injury redetermination does not separate and distinguish the effects of other known factors, particularly with respect to economic downturn, overcapacity and other non-subsidised imports.
Korejska vlada trdi, da Komisija pri ponovnem ugotavljanju škode ni razlikovala in ločevala učinkov drugih znanih dejavnikov, zlasti učinkov gospodarskega upada, presežka zmogljivosti in drugih nesubvencioniranih uvozov.
The Commission disagrees, particularly for the reasons set out in recitals 100 to 123 above.
Komisija se s tem ne strinja, zlati zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodnih izjavah 100 do 123.
Hynix aligns itself with the submissions of the GOK, discussed in the preceding recital.
Hynix se strinja s stališčem Korejske vlade, ki je navedeno v prejšnji uvodni izjavi.
In addition, Hynix submits that the period of time during which duties should be imposed should have been terminated on 1 January 2006.
Poleg tega Hynix trdi, da bi se moralo obdobje, v katerem bi bilo treba uvesti dajatve, končati 1. januarja 2006.
This is not a matter that was the subject of dispute or recommendations by the WTO Panel; and is not therefore part of the ‘measure taken to comply’ with the Panel's recommendations which is encapsulated within this Regulation.
To ni zadeva, ki je bila predmet spora ali priporočil preiskovalnega odbora STO in kot taka ni del „ukrepa za izvajanje priporočil preiskovalnega odbora“, ki ga zajema ta uredba.
This Regulation does not alter the impending expiry date of the definitive Regulation.
Ta uredba ne spreminja bližnjega izteka dokončne uredbe.
The question of an early termination of the measure rather falls within the ambit of an eventual interim review, not within the ambit of implementation of the Panel report.
Vprašanje predčasnega prenehanja ukrepa bi moralo biti prej zajeto v morebitni vmesni pregled in ne v ukrep za izvajanje poročila preiskovalnega odbora.
Hynix also submits that the revised rate of duty must apply retroactively from the date on which measures were first imposed.
Hynix prav tako trdi, da je treba spremenjeno stopnjo dajatve od dne, ko so bile dajatve prvič uvedene, uporabljati za nazaj.
The Commission similarly considers that this issue is not part of the ‘measure taken to comply’ and in any event does not agree.
Komisija glede navedenega ponovno meni, da to vprašanje ni predmet „ukrepa za izvajanje priporočil preiskovalnega odbora“ in se nikakor ne strinja z navedenim.
Nothing in the relevant legal rules obliges the Commission to apply the revised duty retroactively, the Panel limiting itself to recommending that the measure be brought in conformity, which is achieved by the present Regulation.
Nobena določba ustreznih pravnih predpisov ne obvezuje Komisije, da uporablja spremenjeno stopnjo dajatve za nazaj, preiskovalni odbor pa je zgolj priporočil, naj se ukrep uskladi s temi predpisi, kar je bilo uresničeno s to uredbo.
Infineon substantially agrees with the redetermination.
Infineon se v bistvu strinja z rezultati nove ugotovitve.
However, it submits that the Commission should impose a higher duty based on a proxy benchmark and the original injury determination, rather than the lower duty set out in this Regulation.
Vendar pa meni, da bi morala Komisija na podlagi alternativne primerjave in rezultatov prvotnega ugotavljanja škode, namesto nižje dajatve, ki je predvidena v tej uredbi, uvesti višjo dajatev.
The Commission has carefully considered that request.
Komisija je skrbno preučila to zahtevo.
However, for the reasons set out in this Regulation and due to the specific purpose of this Regulation, notably as an implementation of the Panel's recommendations, the Commission has not altered its initial determination on this point.
Vendar pa Komisija zaradi razlogov, opredeljenih v tej uredbi in zaradi posebnega namena te uredbe, zlasti izvajanja priporočil preiskovalnega odbora, svoje prvotne ugotovitve glede te točke ni spreminjala.
Micron also substantially agrees with the redetermination, referring in this respect to facts and evidence that tend to confirm and corroborate the Commission’s conclusions, including an expert report prepared by Professor J. Hausman.
Micron se v bistvu strinja z novimi ugotovitvami, ki se nanašajo na dejstva in dokaze, ki verjetno potrjujejo in podpirajo sklepe Komisije, vključno z izvedenskim poročilom, ki ga je pripravil profesor J. Hausman.
Therefore, Micron’s comments do not necessitate any modification of those conclusions as such.
Zato na podlagi pripomb Microna sklepov kot takih ni treba spremeniti.
Micron further submits that the Commission should reaffirm, based on current WTO precedent, that the GOK entrusted or directed the banks in the May 2001 restructuring programme and should countervail the subsidies provided by the public bodies.
Micron poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi morala Komisija na podlagi aktualnih predhodnih primerov v okviru STO, ponovno potrditi, da je Korejska vlada naročila bankam in jih pooblastila, da se maja 2001 vključijo v program prestrukturiranja in uravnotežijo subvencije s strani javnih organov.
The Commission has carefully considered this submission which, in principle, has merit.
Komisija je stališče, ki je v bistvu utemeljeno, skrbno preučila.
However, as noted in this Regulation, the May 2001 restructuring programme would not in any event be countervailed, given that the largest proportion of the benefit would have been accounted for in the October 2001 measures.
Vendar pa, kot je navedeno v tej uredbi, program prestrukturiranja maja 2001 nikakor ne bi bil uravnotežen, glede na to, da je bil največji delež ugodnosti namenjen za ukrepe v oktobru 2001.
Mainly for this reason, the Commission has decided not to return to these issues in this implementing Regulation.
Komisija se je zlasti zaradi tega razloga odločila, da se k tem vprašanjem v tej izvedbeni uredbi ne bo več vrnila.
Thus, all comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and taken into account where appropriate.
Pripombe, ki so jih predložile vse zainteresirane stranke, so bile ustrezno obravnavane in upoštevane.
However, certain comments were outside the scope of this Regulation which is only intended to implement the DSB recommendations.
Vendar pa so določene pripombe presegale področje uporabe te uredbe, katere namen je zgolj izvedba priporočil preiskovalnega odbora.
Thus, such comments have not resulted in any changes to this Regulation,
Zato se uredba na podlagi takšnih pripomb ni spremenila –
Council Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1480/2003 se spremeni:
Article 1(2) and (3) shall be replaced by the following:
Odstavka 2 in 3 člena 1 se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (Samsung)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (‚Samsung‘)
Upon presentation to the Member State’s customs authorities of the customs declaration for release into free circulation of multi-combinational forms of DRAMs, the declarant shall indicate in box 44 of the Single Administrative Document (SAD) the reference number corresponding to the below product/origin descriptions indicated in the following table.
Ob predložitvi carinske deklaracije za sprostitev večkombinacijskih oblik DRAM-a v prosti promet carinskim organom držav članic deklarant v polju 44 enotne upravne listine (‚EUL‘) navede referenčno številko, ki ustreza opisom izdelka/porekla, navedenim v spodnji tabeli.
Article 1(5) shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 1(5) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
In the case of no indication of any reference number in the SAD, as foreseen in paragraph 3, or if the customs declaration is not accompanied by any statement in the cases required in paragraph 4, the multi-combinational form of DRAM shall — unless the contrary is proved — be considered as originating in the Republic of Korea and as having been manufactured by all companies other than Samsung, and the countervailing duty rate of 32,9 % shall apply.
Če v EUL ni navedena referenčna številka, določena v odstavku 3, ali če carinske deklaracije ne spremlja izjava, kadar se to zahteva v odstavku 4, se šteje, da večkombinacijska oblika DRAM-a – razen če se ne dokaže nasprotno – izvira iz Republike Koreje in da so jo proizvedla vsa podjetja razen Samsunga, pri čemer se uporabi stopnja izravnalne dajatve 32,9 %.
In cases where some of the DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs incorporated in multi-combinational forms of DRAMs are not clearly marked and their manufacturers are not clearly identifiable from the statement required in paragraph 4, such DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs shall — unless the contrary is proved — be considered as originating in the Republic of Korea and as having been manufactured by companies subject to the countervailing duty.
Kadar določeni čipi DRAM-a in/ali vdelani DRAM, vgrajeni v večkombinacijske oblike DRAM-a, niso jasno označeni in njihovi proizvajalci jasno navedeni v zahtevani izjavi, je treba predpostaviti – razen v primerih, ko se dokaže nasprotno – da imajo taki čipi DRAM-a in/ali vdelan DRAM poreklo iz Republike Koreje in da jih proizvajajo podjetja, za katera se uporablja izravnalna dajatev.
Should, however, the value of the aforementioned DRAM chips and/or mounted DRAMs be such to determine that the multi-combinational forms of DRAMs in which they are incorporated becomes of Korean origin, the countervailing duty rate of 32,9 % shall apply to the multi-combinational forms of DRAMs.’.
Če pa bi bila vrednost zgoraj navedenih čipov DRAM in/ali vdelanega DRAM-a taka, da je možno ugotoviti, da so večkombinacijske oblike DRAM-a, v katere so vgrajeni, korejskega porekla, se za večkombinacijske oblike DRAM-a uporabi stopnja izravnalne dajatve v višini 32,9 %.“.
OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10.
UL L 201, 26.7.2001, str. 10.
OJ L 102, 24.4.2003, p. 7.
UL L 102, 24.4.2003, str. 7.
OJ L 336, 23.12.1994, p. 156.
UL L 336, 23.12.1994, str. 156.
Regulation (EC) No 2116/2005 amended the definitive Regulation for the purpose of adopting special provisions in order to ensure that the countervailing duty is properly levied on the product concerned.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2116/2005 je bila spremenjena dokončna uredba za namen sprejetja posebnih določb, s katerimi se zagotovi pravilno obračunavanje izravnalne dajatve za zadevni izdelek.
Panel report, paragraph 7.110.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.110.
Panel report, paragraph 7.109.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.109.
Based on the Panel's findings, the purchase of CBs by the public bodies involved in the May 2001 restructuring programme remains a countervailable subsidy.
Na podlagi ugotovitev preiskovalnega odbora se nakup ZO s strani javnih organizacij, vključenih v program prestrukturiranja iz maja 2001, še vedno šteje za subvencijo, proti kateri se lahko sprejmejo izravnalni ukrepi.
However, no further action is required on this point, as any benefit has already been accounted for in the subsidy found to be conferred by the October 2001 restructuring programme (see recital 65 et seq.).
Vendar pa pri tem ni potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje, saj so bile vse ugodnosti že vštete v subvencijo, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila dodeljena v okviru programa prestrukturiranja iz oktobra 2001 (glej uvodno izjavo 65 et seq).
Panel report, paragraph 7.69.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.69.
Panel report, paragraph 7.186.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.186.
Panel report, paragraph 7.184.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.184.
Panel report paragraph 7.184.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.184.
See also footnote 171, where the Panel states that the examination of other participants is important, but that ‘we emphasise that we do not wish to imply that it is necessarily the end-point of such an analysis, as it will need to be determined whether the behaviour of these market players is so distorted by the government's intervention that they can no longer serve as the benchmark against which to measure the alleged government distortion’.
Glej tudi opombo 171, kjer preiskovalni odbor navaja, da je sodelovanje drugih udeležencev pomembno, vendar pa „poudarjamo, da ne želimo navajati na misel, da je to zadnja točka takšne analize, saj je treba še ugotoviti, ali je ravnanje teh tržnih udeležencev tako izkrivljeno zaradi posredovanja vlade, da se jih ne da več uporabiti za primerjavo pri ugotavljanju izkrivljanja zaradi domnevne vpletenosti vlade.“
Definitive Regulation, recital 19.
Dokončna uredba, uvodna izjava 19.
Kookmin Bank Prospectus, Offering of American Depositary Shares (18 June 2002) (attachment 67 to Micron Technology Italia’s 14 May 2003 submission on the provisional Regulation) (emphasis added).
Kookmin Bank Prospectus, Offering of American Depositary Shares (18. junij 2002) (priloga 67 k predložitvi Micron Technology Italia z dne 14. maja 2003 o začasni uredbi) (krepki in poševni tisk je tukaj dodan).
Kookmin Bank, Annual Report (2001), page 58.
Kookmin Bank, Letno poročilo (2001), str. 58.
‘Banks Under Fire for Reducing Export Credit Ceilings for HEI’, Korea Herald, 27 January 2001.
„Banks Under Fire for Reducing Export Credit Ceilings for HEI“, Korea Herald, 27. januar 2001.
‘KorAm Reluctantly Continues Financial Support for Hynix’, Korea Times, 21 June 2001.
„KorAm Reluctantly Continues Financial Support for Hynix“, Korea Times, 21. junij 2001.
See ‘Koran Bks Complete Purchase of KRW1T Hynix Conn Bond,’ Dow Jones International News, 20 June 2001 (‘KorAm Bank's reversal of its board's decision comes after the Financial Supervisory Service warned of a possible sanction for KorAm for threatening to break the earlier rescue pact for Hynix.’).
Glej„Koran Bks Complete Purchase of KRW1T Hynix Conn Bond,“ Dow Jones International News, 20. junij 2001 („KorAm Bank’s reversal of its board’s decision comes after the Financial Supervisory Service warned of a possible sanction for KorAm for threatening to break the earlier rescue pact for Hynix.“).
Kookmin/H&CB Prospectus, 10 September 2001 (Micron Italia post hearing submission, 14 February 2003 at Exhibit 9).
Kookmin/H&CB Prospectus, 10. september 2001 (Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Micron Italia, 14. februar 2003, z dokazom 9).
‘Pusan, Kyongnam Banks Receive Conditional Approval from FSS’, Korea Herald 18 January 1999.
„Pusan, Kyongnam Banks Receive Conditional Approval from FSS“, Korea Herald, 18. januar 1999.
‘Officials of NFLC, Pusan Bank Punished for Mismanagement’, Korea Herald, 29 April 2000.
„Officials of NFLC, Pusan Bank Punished for Mismanagement“, Korea Herald, 29. april 2000.
Provisional Regulation, recital 87.
Začasna uredba, uvodna izjava 87.
Panel report, footnote 185:‘While it is certainly true that Citibank, and its subsidiary SSB, are not government owned at all, we consider that the EC sufficiently demonstrated that the close relationship with the government and the specific role as financial advisor to Hynix throughout the restructuring make Citibank particularly inapt to serve as an appropriate market benchmark for assessing whether the government’s financial contribution was in line with the normal market conditions, or whether it, on the contrary, conferred a benefit to Hynix.
Opomba 185 v Poročilu preiskovalnega odbora.„Kljub temu, da je res, da Citibank in njene podružnice SSB vlada nima v lasti, menimo, da je ES predložila zadostne dokaze o tem, da sta tesen odnos z vlado in posebna vloga finančnega svetovalca Hynixu pri prestrukturiranju dovolj močna razloga za to, da Citibank ne more biti uporabljena kot ustrezna tržna primerjava pri oceni, ali je bil finančni prispevek vlade v skladu z normalnimi tržnimi pogoji ali je, nasprotno, Hynixu dodelila ugodnosti.
This is especially so given the very small participation in Hynix by Citibank, whose share of the total Hynix loans in October 2001 was 1,3 %.
To še zlasti drži ob upoštevanju zelo omejenega sodelovanja Citibank v družbi Hynix; oktobra 2001 je delež Citibank celotnega posojila Hynixa znašal 1,3 %.
(Preliminary Deterimantion, paragraph 93).’
(Predhodna ugotovitev, odstavek 93).“
Guidelines for the calculation of the amount of subsidy in countervailing duty investigations (Official Journal of the European Communities C 394, 17.12.1998, p. 6) (the Guidelines).
Smernice za izračun višine subvencij v preiskavah v zvezi z izravnalnimi dajatvami (UL C 394, 17.12.1998, str. 6) („Smernice“).
Panel report, paragraphs 7.211 and 7.212.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavka 7.211 in 7.212.
Panel report, footnote 186.
Opomba 186 v Poročilu preiskovalnega odbora.
Panel report, paragraph 7.213.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.213.
The Panel refers to the cost to the ‘provider of the financial contribution’, that is, the Government of Korea and the private banks which it directs.
Preiskovalni odbor se sklicuje na „financerja teh finančnih prispevkov“, tj. na korejsko vlado in zasebne banke, ki so odvisne od nje.
Panel report, paragraph 7.85.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.85.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.189 to 7.192.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavki 7.189 do 7.192.
Panel report, paragraph 7.189.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.189.
Definitive Regulation, recitals 87 and 101 to 112.
Dokončna uredba, uvodne izjave 87, 101 in 112.
The Commission notes that although Hynix ' s current ratio improved somewhat to 0,65 in 2001, this improvement was solely attributable to the October 2001 restructuring, which enabled Hynix to drastically reduce the current portion of its long-term debt and, thus, its current liabilities.
Komisija navaja, da čeprav se je tekoče razmerje Hynixa dvignilo na 0,65 leta 2001, je treba ta napredek pripisati zgolj prestrukturiranju oktobra 2001, ki je Hynixu omogočilo, da drastično zniža delež svojega dolgoročnega dolga in s tem svojih tekočih obveznosti.
See footnote 2.
Ibid.“
Saunders Report, p. 18.
Saundersovo poročilo, str. 18.
‘Korea Daily Comment: Hyundai Electronics,’ UBS Warburg, 4 January 2001, p. 2 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 64).
„Korea Daily Comment: Hyundai Electronics,“ UBS Warburg, 4. januar 2001, str. 2 (Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Micron Italia, 14. februar 2003, z dokazom 64).
‘Hyundai Electronics,’ UBS Warburg, 8 January 2001, p. 7 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 19).
„Hyundai Electronics“ UBS Warburg, 8. januar 2001, str. 7 (Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Micron Italia, 14. februar 2003, z dokazom 19).
‘Hyundai Electronics Inc. Digging a Deeper Hole,’ Deutsche Bank, 23 February 2001, p. 8 (Micron Italia, 14 February 2003, post-hearing submission, Exhibit 66).
„Hyundai Electronics Inc. Digging a Deeper Hole“, Deutsche Bank, 23. februar 2001, str. 8 (Ugotovitve po zaslišanju Micron Italia, 14. februar 2003, z dokazom 66).
The Korea Herald, 15 February 2001.
Korea Herald, 15. februar 2001.
Reuters News, 21 June 2001.
Reuters News, 21. junij 2001.
The Korea Herald, 13 June 2001.
Korea Herald, 13. junij 2001.
The CBO’s and CLO’s are asset-backed securities that are sold to investment trusts.
CBO in CLO so premoženjski vrednostni papirji, ki se prodajo investicijskim skladom.
Preliminary Determination, paragraphs 47 and 48.
Predhodna ugotovitev, odstavki 47–48.
Preliminary Determination, paragraph 49.
Id., odstavek 49.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.88 and 7.89.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavka 7.88 in 7.89.
Panel report, paragraphs 7.194 to 7.199.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavki 7.194 do 7.199.
See ‘Direct Intervention by the Government in Supporting Hynix,’ Korea Economic Daily, 28 August 2001 (reporting on the discovery by the Korean National Assembly of correspondence between the Korean Economic Ministers and the KEIC directing the KEIC to provide assistance to Hynix) (Attachment 1 to Micron Italia’s 14 May 2003 submission on the provisional Regulation).
Glej„Direct Intervention by the Government in Supporting Hynix“, Korea Economic Daily, 28. avgust 2001 (poročilo o razkritju korespondence med korejskimi gospodarskimi ministri in KEIC v zvezi navodili KEIC-u, da naj zagotovi pomoč Hynixu, do katerega je prišel korejski parlament) (priloga 1 k predložitvi Micron Technology Italia z dne 14. maja 2003 o začasni uredbi).
As stated in recital 53 of the definitive Regulation, Hynix had originally requested a syndicated loan of KRW 1 trillion, but was only able to raise KRW 800 billion.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 53 dokončne uredbe, je Hynix prvotno zahteval posojilo bančnega konzorcija v višini 1000 milijard, vendar je dobil le 800 milijard.
If the three banks which accounted for KRW 300 billion of the KRW 800 billion total were unable to participate without the GOK’s specific permission, it is highly speculative that the remaining banks would have gone forward with the loan.
Če tri banke, ki so prispevale od skupnega zneska 800 milijard prispevale 300 milijard, ne bi mogle sodelovati, ker jim KV ne bi bila izdala posebnega dovoljenja, se zdi izredno vprašljivo, ali bi sodelovale tudi ostale banke.
Panel report, paragraph 7.104.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.104.
Panel report, paragraph 7.97.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.97.
Recitals 17 to 22, 56 and 57.
Uvodne izjave 17 do 22, 56 in 57.
Preliminary Determination, paragraph 77.
Predhodna ugotovitev, odstavek 77.
The KDB did not participate in the new loan of KRW 658 billion.
KDB ni sodelovala pri novem posojilu v višini 658 milijard KRW.
Preliminary Determination, paragraphs 69 to 71.’
Id., odstavki 69–71.“
Panel report, paragraphs 7.204 to 7.210.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavki 7.204 do 7.210.
See Panel report paragraphs 7.212 and 7.213 which discuss the Panel’s opinion that the full amount of the debt-to-equity swap may not reflect the full amount swapped because of the obligation placed on Hynix, in the form of surrendering ownership shares or in dilution of the shares to existing shareholders.
Glej Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora v odstavkih 7.212 in 7.213, ki vsebujejo razpravo o mnenju preiskovalnega odbora, da celoten znesek zamenjave terjatev v lastniške deleže morda ne odraža celotne zamenjave zaradi obveznosti Hynixa, da se odpove lastniškim deležem ali razvodenitve delnic obstoječih delničarjev.
Recitals 17 to 22 and 57 to 59.
Uvodne izjave 17 do 22, 57 do 59.
Panel report, paragraph 7.360.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.360.
Panel report, paragraph 7.362.
Poročilo preiskovalnega odbora, odstavek 7.362.
Data obtained from the confidential version of the questionnaire responses and the financial statements of the Community producers.
Podatki, pridobljeni iz zaupne različice vprašalnika in iz finančnih izkazov proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The total hourly labour costs in the euro area for the whole economy (excluding agriculture, public administration, education, health and other services) increased between 1998 and 2001 by 10,5 % (see ECB Monthly Bulletin for December 2001 and May 2002).
V euroobmočju so se skupni stroški dela na uro za celotno gospodarstvo (razen kmetijstva, javne uprave, izobraževanja, zdravstva in drugih služb) med letoma 1998 in 2001 povečali za 10,5 % (glej mesečni bilten ECB za december 2001 in maj 2002).
However, there were adverse wage and benefit effects suffered by at least one Community DRAM manufacturer, Micron, due to financial losses caused by substantial volumes of subsidised Hynix imports sold at prices that caused substantial DRAM price depression.
Vendar pa so vsaj za enega proizvajalca DRAM-a v Skupnosti, tj. Micron, plače in ugodnosti imele škodljiv učinek zaradi finančnih izgub, ki jih je povzročil znaten obseg subvencioniranega uvoza Hynixa, prodanega po cenah, ki so povzročile znaten padec cen DRAM.
In October 2001, Micron suspended all wage and cost-of-living increases.
Micron od oktobra 2001 ni več zviševal plač in življenjskih stroškov.
In addition, Micron executives took a 20 % reduction in pay.
Poeg tega so se plače višjih vodstvenih delavcev Microna znižale za 20 odstotkov.
Micron's employee profit sharing programme, whereby 10 % of each quarterly profit is shared with Micron employees, was suspended, and senior staff took a 10 % reduction in pay.
Načrt družbe Micron za soudeležbo zaposlenih pri dobičku, v okviru katerega se 10 odstotkov dobička v vsakem četrtletju razdeli med zaposlene v Micronu, je bil začasno opuščen, vodstvenim delavcem pa so se plače znižale za 10 odstotkov.