natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Upon disclosure it was submitted by the GOI and exporters that, (i) the data above should have been disclosed separately for each Community producer separately, (ii) the ability to raise capital did not support an injury finding, (iii) the cash flow allegedly cannot follow this trends in view of the trends for return on investments and profitability and should therefore be re-evaluated and, (iv) without further substantiation the analysis would be insufficient.
Ob razkritju so IV in izvozniki pripomnili, (i) da bi morali biti zgornji podatki razkriti za vsakega proizvajalca Skupnosti posebej, (ii) da sposobnost zbiranja kapitala ne podpira ugotovitve o škodi, (iii) da denarni tok domnevno ne more slediti temu trendu glede na trende donosnosti naložb in mora biti zato ponovno preverjen in (iv) da bi bila analiza brez nadaljnje utemeljitve nezadostna.
In reply to these submissions it should be recalled that in accordance with Article 29 of the basic Regulation (confidentiality) the data cannot be disclosed separately for each Community producer.
V odgovor na te pripombe je treba opomniti, da v skladu s členom 29 osnovne uredbe („zaupnost“) podatki ne morejo biti razkriti za vsakega proizvajalca Skupnosti posebej.
In regard to the ability to raise capital, no negative conclusion on injury has been drawn.
Glede sposobnosti zbiranja kapitala ni bil dosežen negativen zaključek o škodi.
As far as the submission regarding cash flow is concerned, after careful re-examination the respective index as set out above is confirmed.
Glede pripombe na denarni tok je po preudarnem ponovnem preverjanju potrjen zgornji indeks.
In regard to the general submission of insufficient analysis in respect of above factors it should be considered that, (i) the injury finding is not essentially based on these indicators and (ii) that the submission has not substantiated why a further elaboration could still change the overall finding.
Glede splošne pripombe na nezadostno analizo glede zgornjih dejavnikov je treba upoštevati, da (i) ugotovitev škode ne temelji nujno na teh kazalcih in (ii) pripomba ni bila utemeljena z nadaljnjo obrazložitvijo, ki bi še vedno lahko spremenila končno ugotovitev.
Index employment
Indeks Zaposlitev
Index productivity
Indeks Produktivnost
Index wages
Indeks Plače
Employment for the like product remained stable until 2001 but increased considerably in 2002 due to the setting up of a new production plant in the Community by one of the cooperating Community producers.
Zaposlitev za podoben proizvod je bila stabilna do leta 2001 in se je leta 2002 znatno povečala zaradi zagona novega proizvodnega obrata v Skupnosti s strani enega od sodelujočih proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
The total cost for wages followed the same trend.
Skupni stroški plač so sledili istemu trendu.
However, productivity per worker, although increasing until 2001, declined in 2002.
Vendar pa je produktivnost na delavca, ki je do leta 2001 naraščala, leta 2002 padla.
This can be clearly attributed to the start-up phase of one new production plant.
To je mogoče nedvomno pripisati zagonski fazi novega proizvodnega obrata.
No evidence of a decrease of efficiency was found during the investigation.
V preiskavi ni bilo zaslediti dokazov o zmanjšanju učinkovitosti.
The GOI and four exporters submitted that the trends for employment, productivity and wages are not supportive for a finding of material injury in the present case.
IV in štirje izvozniki so pripomnili, da trendi zaposlitve, produktivnosti in plač ne podpirajo ugotovitve materialne škode v tem primeru.
However, it should be noted, that no such conclusion has been made for employment and productivity.
Treba pa je opozoriti, da glede zaposlitve in produktivnosti ni bil sprejet nikakršen zaključek.
With regard to wages, only the total amount of wages increased.
Glede plač se je povečal samo skupni znesek plač.
On average per employee, wages even decreased slightly (see table below).
Povprečne plače na delavca so se rahlo znižale (glej tabelo spodaj).
This shows that, (i) no positive development per employee took place and (ii) the determination of the Community industry to be cost efficient.
To kaže, (i) da ni prišlo do pozitivnega razvoja na delavca in (ii) na odločenost industrije Skupnosti, da bo stroškovno učinkovita.
Index wages per employee
Indeks Plače na delavca
Magnitude of subsidy and recovery from past subsidisation
Obseg subvencij in obnovitev preteklega subvencioniranja
Given the volume and in particular the prices of the subsidised imports from India, the impact of the actual amount of subsidisation, which is significant, cannot be considered to be negligible.
Glede na obseg in zlasti cene subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije, učinka dejanske višine subvencioniranja, ki je znatna, ni mogoče šteti za zanemarljivega.
In this context the GOI and three exporters submitted that the subsidy margins have been overstated.
V tej zvezi so IV in trije izvozniki trdili, da so stopnje subvencioniranja pretirane.
However, as set out in recitals 153 and 154 above, the investigation has shown that the amount of countervailable subsidies expressed ad valorem for the investigated exporting producers ranges between 25,3 and 35,1 %.
Vendar pa je, kot je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (153) in (154) zgoraj, preiskava pokazala, da je višina subvencij, v zvezi s katerimi se lahko sprejme izravnalne ukrepe, izraženih ad valorem, za preiskovane proizvajalce izvoznike med 25,3 % in 35,1 %.
This is a clear finding of significant subsidisation.
To pa je nedvomno znatno subvencioniranje.
Conclusion on the economic situation of the Community industry
Zaključki o gospodarskem stanju industrije Skupnosti
Between 1999 and the review investigation period the volume of the subsidised imports of the product concerned increased significantly by 159 % and their share of the Community market grew by 70 %.
Med letom 1999 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom se je obseg subvencioniranega uvoza znatno povečal za 159 % in njegov delež trga Skupnosti je narasel za 70 %.
This development contrasts with the much less favourable development for exporters from other countries and the Community industry.
Ta razvoj je v nasprotju z mnogo manj ugodnim razvojem za izvoznike iz drugih držav in industrijo Skupnosti.
Imports from other countries to the Community market grew only by 7 % during the period considered and their market share even decreased by 29 %.
Uvoz iz drugih držav na trg Skupnosti je narasel le za 7 % v obravnavanem obdobju, njegov tržni delež pa se je celo zmanjšal za 29 %.
The sales volume of the Community industry grew by 80 % and its market share by 20 % during the period considered.
Obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti se je povečal za 80 % in njen tržni delež za 20 % v obravnavanem obdobju.
However, this positive development can essentially be attributed to the take over of another Community producer by the Community industry in 2000.
Vendar pa je ta pozitivni razvoj mogoče v glavnem pripisati prevzemu drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti s strani industrije Skupnosti leta 2000.
Since 2001, the trend in market share development for the Community industry is even digressive.
Od leta 2001 se je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti celo zniževal.
In particular, it can be observed that as of 2000 the Community industry did not, in relative terms, keep pace with the increase of Community consumption and the strong evolution of its Indian competitors on the Community market.
Zlasti je mogoče opaziti, da od leta 2000 industrija Skupnosti, v relativnem smislu, ni sledila povečanju porabe Skupnosti in hitremu razvoju indijskih konkurentov na trgu Skupnosti.
In this context, it is noted that the average prices of subsidised imports from India were consistently lower than those of the Community industry during the period considered.
V tem smislu je potrebno poudariti, da so bile povprečne cene subvencioniranega izvoza iz Indije dosledno nižje od cen industrije Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju.
Moreover, during the review investigation period, the prices of the imports from the country concerned undercut those of the Community industry.
Poleg tega je uvoz iz zadevne države v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti.
On a weighted average basis, price undercutting was in the review investigation period between 11,5 and 17,1 %.
Tehtano povprečje nelojalnega nižanja cen je bilo v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom med 11,5 % in 17,1 %.
As a consequence of this price pressure exercised by subsidised Indian imports, the Community industry was at no time during the period considered in a position to reach non-injurious price levels.
Kot posledica tega cenovnega pritiska, ki ga je izvajal subvencioniran indijski uvoz, industrija Skupnosti nikoli v obravnavanem obdobju ni bila v položaju, da bi dosegala neškodljive ravni cen.
Although profitability of the Community industry initially improved after the imposition of measures, it has deteriorated since 2001 and its actual level is well below what it could reasonably have achieved in the absence of subsidised imports, i.e. 10 % on turnover (see recital 260).
Čeprav se je dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti po uvedbi ukrepov najprej izboljšala, se je po letu 2001 poslabšala in njena dejanska raven je precej pod ravnijo, ki bi bila lahko dosežena ob odsotnosti subvencioniranega uvoza, tj. 10 % od prometa (glej uvodno izjavo (260)).
However, only an acceptable level of profitability will allow the Community industry to remain viable in a sustainable way.
Vendar pa bo samo sprejemljiva raven dobičkonosnosti industriji Skupnosti omogočila trajnostno preživetje.
This negative tendency for the Community industry is further reflected in the picture displayed by the trends in return on investment and cash flow.
Ta negativen trend za industrijo Skupnosti se odraža tudi v trendih donosnosti naložb in denarnega toka.
Regarding captive sales, the option for the Community industry to sell part of its production on the captive market provided it with the opportunity to maintain high levels of capacity utilisation.
Glede omejene prodaje je možnost prodaje dela proizvodnje na omejenem trgu industriji Skupnosti nudila možnost ohranjanja visoke stopnje izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti.
High capacity utilisation contributes to decrease cost of production because of economies of scale.
Visoka izkoriščenost zmogljivosti prispeva k zmanjšanju stroškov proizvodnje zaradi ekonomije obsega.
Furthermore, as outlined above, the trends in sales volumes, prices and market share between the free and captive markets did not diverge significantly.
Poleg tega, kot je opisano zgoraj, se trendi obsega prodaje, cen, in tržnega deleža za prosti in omejen trg niso bistveno razlikovali.
In the absence of the higher profits achieved by the industry on captive sales, the industry would be in a worse financial situation.
Če industrija ne bi dosegala višje stopnje dobičkonosnosti na omejeni osnovi, bi bila v še slabšem finančnem položaju.
Thus, the captive use did not contribute to the injurious situation.
Omejena uporaba torej ne prispeva k škodnemu stanju.
To the contrary, without a captive market the injurious situation of the Community industry might even have been worse.
Nasprotno, brez omejenega trga bi bilo lahko škodno stanje industrije Skupnosti celo slabše.
Two exporters contended that it cannot be concluded that the captive market sales did not contribute to the injurious situation of the Community industry, because captive sales prices are allegedly unreliable, i.e. the profitability of captive sales would be artificially too high.
Dva izvoznika sta ugovarjala, da ni mogoče zaključiti, da prodaja na omejenem trgu ni prispevala k škodnemu stanju industrije Skupnosti, ker so omejene prodajne cene domnevno nezanesljive, tj. dobičkonosnost omejenih prodaj bi bila umetno previsoka.
However, higher profitability on the captive market was not mainly the result of higher transfer prices, but in particular attributable to lower SG & A (see recital 208).
Vendar pa višja dobičkonosnost na omejenem trgu ni bila v glavnem posledica višjih transfernih cen, temveč predvsem nižjih S&AS (glej uvodno izjavo (208)).
Furthermore, this submission neglects the effect of economies of scale.
Poleg tega ta pripomba ne upošteva učinka ekonomij obsega.
Thus, it cannot change the conclusion that the captive sales did not contribute to the injury.
Zato ne more spremeniti zaključka, da omejene prodaje niso prispevale k škodi.
As a result, it was confirmed that, overall, the Community industry has suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 8(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bilo potrjeno, da je v celoti industrija Skupnosti utrpela bistveno škodo v smislu člena 8(1) osnovne uredbe.
It should be recalled that Article 8(5) of the basic Regulation does not mandate all economic indicators for the Community industry to be negative in order to establish material injury.
Treba je opomniti, da člen 8(5) osnovne uredbe ne zahteva, da morajo biti za določitev bistvene škode vsi gospodarski kazalci industrije Skupnosti negativni.
Moreover, not all economic indicators have the same weight.
Poleg tega nimajo vsi gospodarski kazalci enake teže.
Profitability, though, is one of the key economic indicators, since it constitutes the ultimate goal of every economic undertaking.
Dobičkonosnost pa je eden od ključnih gospodarskih kazalcev, ker predstavlja končni cilj vsakega gospodarskega podjetja.
In the present case, insufficient profitability levels were established.
V tem primeru so bile ugotovljene nezadostne stopnje dobičkonosnosti.
Another important injury indicator having a major impact on profitability is the price levels.
Drug pomemben kazalec škode, ki ima pomemben vpliv na dobičkonosnost, je raven cene.
The Community industry was never in a position to achieve non injurious price levels during the period considered on the free market due to external price pressure, mainly from heavily subsidised Indian imports.
Industrija Skupnosti nikoli v obravnavanem obdobju ni bila v položaju, da bi dosegala neškodljive ravni cen na prostem trgu zaradi zunanjega cenovnega pritiska, v glavnem s strani subvencioniranega indijskega uvoza.
Effect of the subsidised imports
Učinek subvencioniranega uvoza
In 2000, and most likely due to the imposition of measures, India lost its position as the second largest exporter to the Community market for an interim period, whereas notably Omani exporters gained market share.
Leta 2000, po vsej verjetnosti zaradi uvedbe ukrepov, je Indija za vmesno obdobje izgubila položaj drugega največjega uvoznika na trg Skupnosti, medtem ko so zlasti izvozniki iz Omana pridobili tržni delež.
However, since then, Indian exporters not only have recovered their position, but in the review investigation period they even took over the lead as the largest exporter to the Community.
Vendar pa so si od takrat indijski izvozniki povrnili položaj in v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom celo postali največji izvoznik v Skupnost.
This growth in volume of the subsidised imports from India, in particular since 2002, coincided with the fact that in 2002, the profitability for the Community industry decreased as compared with 2001, i.e. by around 36 %.
Ta rast obsega subvencioniranega uvoza iz Indije, zlasti od leta 2002, je sovpadala z dejstvom, da je leta 2002 dobičkonosnost industrije Skupnosti v primerjavi z letom 2001 upadla za okoli 36 %.
It was found that, during this time, one Community producer set up a new plant and found itself in a start-up phase which may have had an effect on its profitability in that period.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je v tem času en proizvajalec Skupnosti zagnal nov obrat in se znašel v zagonski fazi, ki je lahko vplivala na njegovo dobičkonosnost.
However, it was also found that the other Community producer, which was not in a start-up phase, found itself confronted with a significant decrease in profitability, i.e. by 17 % as compared with 2001 which further deteriorated during the review investigation period.
Ugotovljeno pa je bilo tudi, da se je tudi drugi proizvajalec Skupnosti, ki ni bil v zagonski fazi, soočil z znatnim upadom dobičkonosnosti, tj. za 17 %, v primerjavi z letom 2001, ki se je v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom še poslabšala.
Moreover, as stated under recital 207, at no point in time was the Community industry in a position to reach non-injurious price levels.
Poleg tega, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (207), industrija Skupnosti ni bila nikoli v položaju, da bi dosegala neškodljive ravni cen.
To the contrary, again starting in 2002, the Community industry had to adjust prices downwards in order to defend its market share.
Ravno nasprotno, industrija Skupnosti je morala od leta 2002 spet zniževati cene, da je branila svoj tržni delež.
Upon disclosure, three exporters submitted that the Indian imports share on the Community market, 2,5 % during the IP, and their volume in relation to total imports, 8,4 % during the IP, both of which slightly decreased as compared with 2002, would be too small and marginal to have any injurious impact in particular in view of a bigger market share hold by the Community industry.
Ob razkritju so trije izvozniki pripomnili, da je bil delež indijskega uvoza na trgu Skupnosti, 2,5 % v OP, in njegov obseg glede na skupen uvoz, 8,4 % v OP, (oba deleža sta rahlo upadla glede na leto 2002) premajhen in premalo pomemben, da bi lahko imel škodljiv vpliv, zlasti glede na večji tržni delež, ki ga ima industrija Skupnosti.
Furthermore, it was argued that an analysis expressed in relative terms would be misleading, because India started from a very low level, 1,5 % market share and 3,7 % import volume in 1999.
Trdili so tudi, da bi bila relativna analiza zavajajoča, ker je Indija začela na zelo nizki stopnji s tržnim deležem 1,5 % in obsegom uvoza 3,7 % leta 1999.
In reply to this submission it should be considered that both, India’s market share and its import volume during the IP, are well above the de minimis thresholds set in Articles 10(11) and 14(4) of the basic Regulation, thus can have a causal effect.
V odgovor na te pripombe je treba upoštevati, da sta tržni delež Indije in njen obseg uvoza v OP precej nad de minimis pragovi, določenimi v členih 10(11) in 14(4) osnovne uredbe, in imata torej lahko vzročni učinek.
According to Article 8(6) of the basic Regulation, a causal effect can be manifested alternatively either by the import volume or by the price levels of subsidised imports.
V skladu s členom 8(6) osnovne uredbe, se lahko vzročni učinek prikaže kot obseg uvoza ali raven cen subvencioniranega uvoza.
Such price level impact can clearly be observed in the present case.
V tem primeru je nedvomno mogoče ugotoviti takšen vpliv ravni cen.
As already established in the course of the original investigation, the product under investigation, a bulk commodity, is highly price sensitive and reacts swiftly to any downward pressure.
Kot je bilo ugotovljeno že v prvotni preiskavi, je blago na debelo cenovno izredno občutljivo blago in se hitro odziva na cenovni pritisk.
In such cases small quantities can influence prices on the market.
V takšnih primerih lahko majhne količine vplivajo na cene na trgu.
In fact, over the period considered the Indian prices set on average the price pressure benchmark in this case.
Dejansko so v tem primeru indijske cene določale cenovni pritisk.
It was therefore confirmed that the subsidised imports from India had a considerable negative impact on the situation of the Community industry during the period considered, in particular in terms of profitability.
Zato je potrjeno, da ima uvoz iz Indije znaten negativni učinek na stanje industrije v Skupnosti v obravnavanem obdobju, zlasti glede dobičkonosnosti.
Impact of other factors
Vpliv drugih dejavnikov
Third country imports
Uvoz iz tretjih držav
Volume (kg)
Obseg (kg)
Average import price per kg (EUR)
Povprečna uvozna cena na kg (EUR)
Imports of the product under consideration from countries other than India increased by only 7 % between 1999 and the review investigation period, i.e. well below the rate of increase of the Community consumption.
Uvoz obravnavanega izdelka iz drugih držav, razen Indije, se je med 1999 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom povečal le za 7 %, tj. precej pod stopnjo rasti porabe Skupnosti.
Amongst these countries, Oman, the United States of America (USA), China, South Korea and Singapore are the main suppliers to the Community market.
Med temi državami so Oman, ZDA, Kitajska, Južna Koreja in Singapur glavni dobavitelji za trg Skupnosti.
However, their average import prices were considerably higher than the Indian import prices and, except for the import prices from Oman, also the Community industry prices.
Toda njihova povprečna uvozna cena je bila znatno višja od indijske uvozne cene in, razen uvoznih cen Omana, tudi nad cenami industrije Skupnosti.
Import prices of Oman are at comparable levels to the Community industry’s prices, but Oman’s increase in market share over the period considered was much less pronounced than that for the other third countries.
Uvozne cene Omana so primerljive s cenami industrije Skupnosti, toda povečanje tržnega deleža Omana je bilo v obravnavanem obdobju precej manj izrazito kot pri drugih tretjih državah.
Following disclosure, it was submitted by the GOI and two exporters that the countervailing duty in place for Indian imports should have been taken into consideration when comparing average sales prices.
Po razkritju so IV in dva izvoznika trdili, da je pri primerjavi povprečnih prodajnih cen treba upoštevati obstoječo izravnalno dajatev na indijski uvoz.
This would allegedly lead to practically similar Indian and Omani price levels.
To naj bi vodilo v skoraj enako raven cen Indije in Omana.
In addition, it was noted that average prices from some third countries, notably the USA and China, decreased significantly over the period considered whereas, inter alia, Indian prices increased.
Poleg tega je bilo opozorjeno, da so povprečne cene nekaterih tretjih držav, predvsem ZDA in Kitajske, v obravnavanem obdobju znatno padle, medtem ko so indijske cene med drugim rahlo narasle.
Furthermore, it was submitted by another exporter that the volume decrease in Indian imports between 2002 and the review investigation period has not been properly taken into account in the analysis, that other third countries were the main suppliers and that average prices from South Korea and India were similar from 1999 to 2001.
Drugi izvoznik je tudi trdil, da v analizi ni bilo ustrezno upoštevano zmanjšanje obsega indijskega uvoza med 2002 in obdobjem preiskave v zvezi s pregledom, da so druge tretje države glavni dobavitelj in da so bile povprečne cene Južne Koreje in Indije od 1999 do 2001 podobne.
With regard to the original countervailing duty in place, it should be noted that the vast majority of imports from India were either subject to a zero duty rate or to a duty rate which still leads to lower average landing prices than the average Omani price levels.
Glede prvotne izravnalne dajatve je treba omeniti, da je bila večina uvoza iz Indije predmet ničelne dajatve ali dajatve, ki še vedno vodi do nižje povprečne cene ob iztovarjanju, kot je povprečna raven cen Omana.
Thus, on average Omani imports did not exercise the same degree of price pressure.
Tako v povprečju uvoz iz Omana ni izvajal enako močnega cenovnega pritiska.
In addition, import prices from all other third countries as well were on average higher over the period considered than Indian price levels, again clearly identifying India as main source of price pressure.
Poleg tega so bile uvozne cene iz drugih tretjih držav v obravnavanem obdobju tudi v povprečju višje od indijskih ravni cen, kar tudi jasno opredeljuje Indijo kot glavni vir cenovnega pritiska.
This, of course, had an impact on the trade flow of the product concerned.
To je seveda vplivalo na menjalni tok zadevnega izdelka.
Moreover, despite measures, Indian imports grew strongly since 2001 and India recovered its position as second largest exporter in 2002 to become during the IP even the biggest.
Poleg tega je od leta 2001 indijski uvoz kljub ukrepom močno naraščal in Indija je leta 2002 ponovno postala drugi največji uvoznik, v OP pa celo največji.