natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 8 % of turnover (i.e. EUR 5,7 m) and it is in line with the profit made by the Community industry in 1998 and 1999, before Chinese exports started to be a problem.
Stopnja dobička pred obdavčitvijo, uporabljena za ta izračun, je bila 8 % prometa (tj. 5,7 milijona EUR) in je skladna z dobičkom, ki ga je imela industrija Skupnosti v letih 1998 in 1999, preden so kitajski izvozi postali problem.
On this basis a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product by adding the above mentioned profit margin of 8 % to the cost of production.
Na podlagi tega je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena podobnega izdelka za industrijo Skupnosti, in sicer tako, da je bila stroškom proizvodnje dodana 8 % stopnja dobička.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price.
Potrebno povišanje cen je bilo nato določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, kot je bila ugotovljena za izračune zbijanja cen, in povprečno neškodljivo ceno.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the average import CIF value.
Razlika, ki pri tej primerjavi nastane, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek povprečne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
These differences were in all cases above the dumping margin found.
Te razlike so bile v vseh primerih nad ugotovljeno stopnjo dampinga.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that a provisional anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the lowest of the dumping and injury margins found, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgoraj omenjenega je zaključeno, da se v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe uvede začasna protidampinška dajatev po stopnji najnižjih ugotovljenih stopenj dampinga in škode.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Stopnje protidampinških dajatev za posamezne družbe, ki so navedene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev iz trenutne preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Odražajo torej stanje teh podjetij, ki je bilo ugotovljeno v poteku preiskave.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z državno dajatvijo, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“) veljajo torej izključno za uvoz proizvodov iz zadevne države, ki ga proizvajajo omenjene družbe, torej omenjene specifične pravne osebe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi proizvodi, ki jih proizvaja katera koli druga družba, ki v operativnem delu te uredbe ni specifično omenjena z nazivom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani s katerim koli specifično omenjenim subjektom, ne morejo imeti koristi od teh stopenj in so predmet stopnje dajatve, ki velja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with e.g. that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsi zahtevki za uporabo teh stopenj carin posameznih družb (npr. po spremembi naziva osebe ali po ustanovitvi novih proizvodnih oziroma prodajnih teles) se takoj naslovijo na Komisijo [3] z vsemi potrebnimi podatki, zlasti glede kakršne koli spremembe dejavnosti družbe v zvezi s proizvodnjo ali domačo oziroma izvozno prodajo, povezano, na primer, s to spremembo naziva ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih teles.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Če bo to primerno, se bo ta uredba ustrezno spremenila s posodobitvijo seznama družb, ki imajo korist od individualnih stopenj carin.
The proposed anti-dumping duties are the following:
Predlagane protidampinške dajatve so naslednje:
All other companies
Vse druge družbe
In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
V interesu učinkovitega upravljanja se določi obdobje, v katerem lahko zainteresirane stranke, ki so se prijavile v okviru roka, določenega v obvestilu o začetku, pisno predložijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purposes of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purpose of any definitive duty.
Nadalje, opozarja se tudi, da so ugotovitve v zvezi z uvedbo carin, ki so bile izvedene za to uredbo, začasne in jih bo morda za kakršno koli dokončno dajatev treba ponovno preučiti.
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of woven fabrics of synthetic filament yarn containing 85 % or more by weight of textured and/or non-textured polyester filament, dyed or printed, originating in the People’s Republic of China, falling within CN codes 54075200, 54075400, 54076130, 54076190 and ex54076990 (TARIC code 5407699010).
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz tkanin iz preje iz umetnih filamentov, ki vsebuje 85 masnih % ali več teksturiranih in/ali neteksturiranih poliestrskih filamentov, barvanih ali tiskanih, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, ki spadajo pod oznake KN 54075200, 54075400, 54076130, 54076190 in ex54076990 (koda TARIC 5407699010).
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Community-frontier price of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the companies below shall be as follows:
Stopnja veljavne začasne protidampinške dajatve pred dajatvijo, za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti proizvodov, ki so opisani v odstavku 1 in ki jih proizvajajo spodnje družbe, je naslednja:
TARIC Additional code
Dodatna koda TARIC
The release for free circulation in the Community of the product referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provision of a security, equivalent to the amount of the provisional duty.
Za sprostitev proizvoda, omenjenega v odstavku 1, v prosti promet v Skupnosti je treba plačati varščino, enako znesku začasne carine.
Unless otherwise specified, the provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Če ni drugače navedeno, veljajo določbe, ki veljajo glede carin.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, interested parties may request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted, make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within 30 days of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Zainteresirane stranke lahko brez poseganja v člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 zahtevajo razkritje bistvenih dejstev in premislekov, na podlagi katerih je bila ta uredba sprejeta, pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje pred Komisijo v roku 30 dni po datumu začetka veljave te uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within 30 days of the date of its entry into force.
Zadevne stranke lahko, v skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96, predložijo pripombe o uporabi te uredbe v roku 30 dni po datumu začetka njene veljave.
OJ C 160, 17.6.2004, p. 5.
UL C 160, 17.6.2004, str. 5.
European CommissionDirectorate-General for TradeDirection BOffice J-79 5/16B-1049 Brussels.
Evropska komisijaGeneralni direktorat za trgovinoDirekcija BUrad J-79 5/16B-1049 Bruselj
Average unit prices
Povprečna cena na enoto
(EUR/running metre)
(EUR/tekoči meter)
Article 2(7)(c)
Člen 2(7)(c)
indent 2
alinea 2
indent 3
alinea 3
indent 1
alinea 1
indent 4
alinea 4
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 426/2005 of 15 March 2005 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain finished polyester filament apparel fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 426/2005 z dne 15. marca 2005 o uvedbi začasnih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz določenih dokončanih tkanin za oblačila iz poliestrskih filamentov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
(Official Journal of the European Union L 69 of 16 March 2005)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 69 z dne 16. marca 2005)
On page 31, in Article 1(2):
Na strani 31, v členu 1(2):
‘Company
„Družba
Antidumping duty
Protidampinška dajatev
Where applicable, the correct spelling of the company names, as set out above, should also apply throughout the text of Regulation (EC) No 426/2005 wherever they appear, and namely under recitals 8b, 23, 28, 58 and 139.
Kjer je primerno, je treba pravilni zapis imen podjetij, kot je navedeno zgoraj, prav tako uporabiti v celotnem besedilu Uredbe (ES) št. 426/2005, kjer se podjetja pojavijo, namreč v uvodnih izjavah (8)(b), (23), (28), (58) in (139).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 427/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 427/2005
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 March 2005
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev za žita, ki se uporabljajo od 16. marca 2005
Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 March 2005
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003, v uporabi od 16. marca 2005
period from 1.3.2005-14.3.2005
obdobje od 1.3.2005–14.3.2005
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 30,27 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: — EUR/t.
Prevoz/stroški: Mehiški zaliv–Rotterdam: 30,27 EUR/t; Velika jezera–Rotterdam: — EUR/t.
Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 428/2005
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People's Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan
o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Saudove Arabije, o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2852/2000 o uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških dajatev pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom iz Republike Koreje in o zaključku protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom teh izdelkov s poreklom iz Tajvana
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘Basic Regulation’), and in particular Articles 9 and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 9 in 11(3) Uredbe,
In July 1999, by Regulation (EC) No 1728/1999 [2], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of polyester staple fibres (‘PSF’) originating in Taiwan.
Svet je julija 1999 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1728/1999 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra („RVP“) s poreklom iz Tajvana.
In December 2000, by Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 [3], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of polyester staple fibres originating, inter alia, in the Republic of Korea.
Svet je decembra 2000 z Uredbo (ES) št. 2852/2000 [3] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu rezanih vlaken iz poliestra s poreklom, med drugim, iz Republike Koreje.
The level of the definitive anti-dumping duties established for the exporting producers in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan subject to the above mentioned investigations, expressed as a percentage of the CIF frontier value, was as follows:
Raven dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, določena za proizvajalce-izvoznike v Republiki Koreji in Tajvanu, ki je predmet zgoraj omenjenih preiskav, izražena kot odstotek vrednosti CIF, meja Skupnosti, je bila sledeča:
All other companies 13,0 %
Vse druge družbe 13 %
All other companies 20,2 %
Vse druge družbe 20,2 %
PRESENT INVESTIGATIONS
TEKOČE PREISKAVE
On 19 December 2003, the Commission announced by a notice (‘notice of initiation’) published in the Official Journal of the European Union [4], the initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding with regard to imports into the Community of polyester staple fibres originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’) and Saudi Arabia.
Komisija je 19. decembra 2003 z obvestilom („obvestilo o začetku“) v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [4] objavila začetek protidampinškega postopka v zvezi z uvozom rezanih vlaken iz poliestra v Skupnost iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“) in Saudove Arabije.
On the same day, pursuant to Article 11(3) of the Basic Regulation, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5] the initiation of an interim review of the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulations (EC) No 1728/1999 and (EC) No 2852/2000 on imports of PSF originating in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan.
Na isti dan je Komisija v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 („osnovna uredba“), z obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [5], objavila začetek vmesnega pregleda dokončnih protidampinških dajatev, ki so bile uvedene za uvoz RVP iz Republike Koreje in Tajvana z Uredbama (ES) št. 1728/1999 in (ES) št. 2852/2000.
The anti-dumping investigations were initiated following a complaint and a request lodged on 10 November 2003 by the Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques (‘CIRFS’ or ‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 40 %, of the Community production of PSF.
Protidampinške preiskave so bile uvedene na podlagi pritožbe in zahtevka, ki ga je Comité International de la Rayonne et des Fibres Synthétiques („CIRFS“ ali „pritožnik“) vložil v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večji delež, v tem primeru več kot 40 %, proizvodnje RVP Skupnosti.
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of the said product and of material injury resulting therefrom, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of the proceedings.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu zadevnega izdelka in o znatni škodi, ki iz tega izvira, kar se je štelo kot zadostno, da se upraviči začetek postopka.
INVESTIGATIONS CONCERNING OTHER COUNTRIES AND MEASURES IN FORCE
PREISKAVE V ZVEZI Z DRUGIMI DRŽAVAMI IN VELJAVNIMI UKREPI
There are definitive anti-dumping measures currently in force on imports of PSF originating in (i) Australia, Indonesia and Thailand imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1522/2000 [6]; (ii) India imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000; as well as (iii) Belarus imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1799/2002 [7].
Trenutno veljajo dokončni protidampinški ukrepi pri uvozu RVP iz (i) Avstralije, Indonezije in Tajske, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 1522/2000 [6]; iz (ii) Indije, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 2852/2000; pa tudi iz (iii) Belorusije, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) 1799/2002 [7].
PARTIES CONCERNED BY THE PROCEEDING
STRANKE, KI JIH POSTOPEK ZADEVA
The Commission officially advised the known exporting producers in the PRC, in Saudi Arabia, in Korea and in Taiwan, importers/traders and their associations, suppliers and users known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting countries concerned and the complainant and other known Community producers of the initiation of the proceeding.
Komisija je znane proizvajalce-izvoznike v LRK, Saudovi Arabiji, Koreji in Tajvanu; uvoznike/trgovce in njihova združenja ter uporabnike, za katere se ve, da jih postopek zadeva; predstavnike zadevnih držav izvoznic; pritožnika in druge znane proizvajalce Skupnosti uradno obvestila o začetku postopka.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notices of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila ponujena možnost, da svoja stališča izrazijo pisno in v časovnem okviru, ki je določen v obvestilih o začetku, zahtevajo zaslišanje.
In view of the large number of Chinese, Taiwanese and Korean exporting producers, listed in the complaint and in the request, and the large number of Community importers of the product concerned, sampling was envisaged in both notices of initiation for the determination of dumping and injury, in accordance with Article 17 of the Basic Regulation.
Zaradi velikega števila kitajskih, tajvanskih in korejskih proizvajalcev-izvoznikov, navedenih v pritožbi in v zahtevku, ter velikega števila uvoznikov Skupnosti, ki uvažajo zadevni izdelek, je bilo v obeh obvestilih o začetku predvideno vzorčenje za določitev dampinga in škode, v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers in the countries mentioned in recital (9), and Community importers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notices of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the period 1 January 2003 to 30 November 2003 (‘sampling period’).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno in, če je, izbrala vzorec, so se morali vsi proizvajalci-izvozniki v državah, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi (9), in uvozniki Skupnosti prijaviti Komisiji in zagotoviti, kot je bilo določeno v obvestilih o začetku, osnovne informacije o njihovih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom v obdobju od 1. januarja 2003 do 30. novembra 2003 („obdobje vzorčenja“).
After examination of the information submitted by Chinese exporting producers and due to the low number of replies to the sampling questions, it was decided that sampling was not necessary in respect of Chinese exporting producers.
Po pregledu informacij, ki so jih predložili kitajski proizvajalci-izvozniki, in zaradi majhnega števila odgovorov na vprašanja o vzorčenju, je bilo sklenjeno, da v zvezi s kitajskimi proizvajalci-izvozniki vzorčenje ni potrebno.
In the case of Korea, nine exporting producers replied to the sampling questions.
V primeru Koreje je na vprašanja o vzorčenju odgovorilo devet proizvajalcev-izvoznikov.
The three largest exporting producers in terms of export quantities were selected in the sample.
V vzorcu so bili izbrani trije največji proizvajalci-izvozniki glede na izvozne količine.
However, one of the companies selected withdrew its cooperation subsequently, and was therefore replaced by the fourth largest company in terms of export quantity.
Ena od izbranih družb je kasneje preklicala sodelovanje, zato jo je nadomestila četrta največja družba glede na izvozno količino.
The final sample represented more than 80 % of the reported exports of the product concerned to the Community during the sampling period and consisted of the following companies:
Končni vzorec je predstavljal več kot 80 % prijavljenega izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost v obdobju vzorčenja in je bil sestavljen iz naslednjih družb:
In the case of Taiwan, five companies replied to the sampling questions and reported export sales of the product concerned to the Community during the sampling period.
V primeru Tajvana je na vprašanja o vzorčenju odgovorilo in izvozno prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost v času obdobja vzorčenja prijavilo pet družb.
The three largest companies in terms of export quantities were included in the sample.
V vzorcu so bile izbrane tri največje družbe glede na izvozne količine.
Subsequently, it appeared, however, that one of the selected companies did not export the product concerned for consumption in the Community during the sampling period.
Kasneje pa se je zdelo, da ena od izbranih družb v obdobju vzorčenja zadevnega izdelka ni izvažala za porabo v Skupnosti.
It had therefore to be excluded from the sample.
Zato jo je bilo treba izključiti iz vzorca.
The fourth largest company which was then invited to fill in the questionnaire appeared to be in the same situation.
Tudi za četrto največjo družbo, ki je nato bila povabljena, da izpolni vprašalnik, se je zdelo, da je bila v enakem položaju.
Any further inclusion of another company in the sample, which would have implied an extended deadline to fill in the questionnaire, would have jeopardized the timely completion of the investigation at that stage of the investigation.
Vsakršno dodatno vključevanje kakšne druge družbe v vzorec, bi pomenilo podaljšan rok za izpolnitev vprašalnika in ogrozilo pravočasno izvedbo preiskave na tisti stopnji.
In any case, the two remaining companies counting for more than 95 % of the exports of the product concerned to the Community during the sampling period were considered representative.
V vsakem primeru pa sta družbi, ki sta ostali, predstavljali več kot 95 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost v obdobju vzorčenja, kar se obravnava kot reprezentativni vzorec.
The sample consisted therefore of the following companies:
Vzorec je bil torej sestavljen iz naslednjih družb:
As far as importers into the European Community are concerned, five companies unrelated to the exporting producers were initially selected for the sample, based on their volume of imports from the countries concerned.
Kar zadeva uvoznike v Evropsko skupnost, je bilo za vzorec sprva izbranih pet družb, ki niso bile povezane s proizvajalci-izvozniki, na podlagi količine njihovega uvoza iz zadevnih držav.
One of the three selected companies was subsequently considered as non cooperating and then disregarded as part of the sample.
Ena od treh izbranih družb je bila kasneje obravnavana kot nesodelujoča in se je zato ne upošteva v vzorcu.
The remaining four sampled companies cover 14,6 % of total imports concerned.
Preostale štiri družbe v vzorcu predstavljajo 14,6 % skupnega zadevnega uvoza.
The final sample consisted of the following companies:
Končni vzorec je bil sestavljen iz naslednjih družb:
S.I.M.P., SpA, Italy
S.I.M.P., SpA, Italija
Highams Group Ltd., United Kingdom
Highams Group Ltd., Združeno kraljestvo;
Tob Herman Industries, N.V., Belgium
Tob Herman Industries, N.V., Belgija;
Marubeni Europe plc Hamburg Branch, Germany
Marubeni Europe plc Hamburg Branch, Nemčija
The Commission sent market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’) claim forms to the Chinese exporting producers known to be concerned.
Komisija je kitajskim proizvajalcem-izvoznikom, za katere ve, da jih to zadeva, poslala obrazce zahtevka za tržno gospodarsko obravnavo („MET“) ali individualno obravnavo („IT“).
Claims for MET, or for IT in case the investigation establishes that the exporting producers do not meet the conditions for MET, were received from five exporting producers plus two related companies.
Zahtevke za MET ali za IT, v primeru, da se v teku preiskave ugotovi, da proizvajalci-izvozniki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za MET, je prejela od petih proizvajalcev-izvoznikov in dveh povezanih družb.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all the other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notices of initiation.
Komisija je vsem strankam, za katere ve, da jih postopek zadeva, in drugim družbam, ki so se same prijavile v rokih, določenih v obvestilih o začetku, poslala vprašalnike.