natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The companies now submitting meaningful replies at the definitive stage of the proceeding represent around 18 % of total imports from Norway during the IP and roughly 11 % of consumption (compared with 9 % and 6 % respectively at provisional stage).
Družbe, ki sedaj predložijo smiselno izpolnjene vprašalnike, predstavljajo 18 % celotnega uvoza iz Norveške v OP in približno 11 % potrošnje v zaključni fazi (v primerjavi z 9 % oziroma 6 % v začasni fazi).
Importers and processors (users) considered that ad valorem duties would increase their costs, reduce their sales volume and profitability and may lead to job losses and even delocalisation.
Uvozniki in predelovalci (uporabniki) so menili, da bodo dajatve ad valorem povečale njihove stroške, zmanjšale obseg prodaje in dobičkonosnost ter po možnosti povzročile izgubo delovnih mest in celo preselitev proizvodnje.
They also argued that employment in the fish processing sector is far higher than in the fish farming industry, which nevertheless in some cases provides employment in regions of low employment.
Trdili so tudi, da je zaposlovanje v sektorju predelave rib veliko večje kot v industriji ribogojstva, ki pa v nekaterih primerih zagotavlja zaposlovanje v regijah z nizko stopnjo zaposlovanja.
Processors also stressed the need for consumers and traders to continue to have access to good quality farmed salmon at low prices.
Predelovalci so poudarili tudi, da morajo potrošniki in trgovci še naprej imeti dostop do poceni in kakovostnega gojenega lososa.
However, they generally considered the MIP as a more acceptable form of the measure compared to an ad valorem duty.
Vendar so na splošno menili, da je MUC v primerjavi z dajatvijo ad valorem primernejša oblika ukrepanja.
The main costs incurred in smoking or otherwise processing salmon are those related to the purchase of salmon and employment.
Glavni stroški pri prekajevanju ali drugi predelavi lososa so stroški, povezani z nakupom lososa in zaposlovanjem.
As to employment, during the further investigation different figures have been presented to the Commission in a number of studies or submissions.
Glede zaposlovanja so bili Komisiji med nadaljnjo preiskavo predstavljeni različni podatki v številnih študijah ali stališčih.
These studies and submissions are only of limited use for the purpose of this investigation.
Te študije in stališča so samo delno uporabni za namen te preiskave.
In this context, it should be noted that the studies submitted refer to periods of time other than the IP, do not exactly cover the product concerned and partly use different parameters not covered by this investigation.
V tem okviru je treba opozoriti, da se predložene študije nanašajo na druga časovna obdobja in ne na OP, zadevnega proizvoda ne zajemajo natančno in delno uporabljajo različne parametre, ki jih ta preiskava ne zajema.
Therefore, the Commission also undertook to carry out on-spot visits to relevant associations.
Zato se je Komisija obvezala, da bo izvedla tudi obiske na kraju samem pri ustreznih združenjih.
On the basis of all the information gathered, the best estimate indicates that around 7500 workers are employed directly in the salmon processing sector in the Community.
Na podlagi vseh zbranih informacij je po najboljši oceni v sektorju predelave lososa v Skupnosti neposredno zaposlenih približno 7500 delavcev.
Following the further investigation it was found that farmed salmon represents around 48-54 % and wages around 6-12 % of the total costs of processors.
Po nadaljnji preiskavi je bilo ugotovljeno, da gojeni losos predstavlja približno 48–54 % skupnih stroškov predelovalcev, plače pa 6–12 %.
Under normal market conditions (i.e. reasonable raw material price and good retail price), processors expect operating profits ranging between 5 and 12 %.
V običajnih tržnih pogojih (tj. primerna cena surovin in ugodna maloprodajna cena) predelovalci pričakujejo, da bodo dobički iz poslovanja znašali od 5 do 12 %.
This has been confirmed by the cooperating processors which reported data on profitability.
To so potrdili sodelujoči predelovalci, ki so posredovali podatke o dobičkonosnosti.
The further investigation showed that profit can be even higher in good times.
Nadaljnja preiskava je pokazala, da je lahko dobiček v ugodnih razmerah še večji.
At the end of the distribution chain, retailers may expect a profit margin ranging between 6 and 11 %.
Na koncu distribucijske verige lahko trgovci na drobno pričakujejo, da bo stopnja dobička znašala od 6 do 11 %.
The worries expressed by the users industry are legitimate as they fear a negative impact of the proposed measures on their costs leading to a reduced profitability.
Zaskrbljenost, ki jo je izrazila predelovalna industrija, je upravičena, saj jo skrbi negativni vpliv predlaganih ukrepov na njene stroške, kar povzroča manjšo dobičkonosnost.
However, under the current circumstances and in view of the proposed MIP, any impact on the users’ costs is likely to be small or non-existent.
Vendar pa bo v obstoječih okoliščinah in v okviru predlaganega MUC vpliv na stroške uporabnikov verjetno majhen ali pa ga sploh ne bo.
In a best case scenario, market conditions will remain as they are currently, i.e. prices will remain at a level well above the MIP.
V najboljšem primeru bodo tržni pogoji ostali nespremenjeni, tj. cene bodo še naprej veliko višje od MUC.
In such a case the MIP will have no impact at all on the costs of users.
V takem primeru MUC ne bo imel nobenega vpliva na stroške uporabnikov.
Where imports are undertaken at a CIF Community border price equal to or above the MIP established, no duty would be payable.
Za uvoz po ceni CIF na meji Skupnosti, ki je enaka ali višja od določenega MUC, se dajatev ne bi plačevala.
In a worst case scenario with the imposition of measures, the cost of users’ raw material will be set at the level of the MIP, namely at the level of the actual costs incurred by producers plus reasonable profit for deliveries on the Community market.
V najslabšem primeru bodo stroški uporabnikov za surovine ob uvedbi ukrepov določeni na ravni MUC, torej na ravni dejanskih stroškov proizvajalcev in razumnega dobička za dobave na trg Skupnosti.
Although this scenario does not reflect current market conditions, it is considered that in such a case it cannot be excluded that the imposition of anti-dumping duties will have some negative impact on importers and processors as duties, if any, would be directly payable at the time of import whatever the level of the import price.
Čeprav ta primer ne odraža obstoječih tržnih pogojev, pa se meni, da se v takem primeru ne more izključiti dejstva, da bi uvedba protidampinških dajatev negativno vplivala na uvoznike in predelovalce, saj bi bilo treba vse dajatve plačati neposredno v času uvoza ne glede na raven uvozne cene.
However, in this context it is recalled that the measure proposed is in the form of a MIP which is a floor price intended only to ensure that Community producers can sell their salmon in the Community at prices, on the basis of the lesser duty rule, that will allow them to cover their costs and allow for a margin of profit that they could normally expect in the absence of dumped imports.
Vendar je treba v tem okviru opozoriti, da bo predlagana oblika ukrepa MUC, ki je najnižja cena, s katero bi se proizvajalcem Skupnosti zagotovilo, da lahko lososa prodajo v Skupnosti po cenah na podlagi pravila nižje dajatve, omogočila kritje njihovih stroškov in stopnjo dobička, ki bi jo običajno lahko pričakovali, če dampinškega uvoza ne bi bilo.
Duties will only be collected, in possible exceptional cases, when the free-at-Community-frontier price of Norwegian imports falls below the MIP and then only at a level equivalent to the difference between the import price and the MIP.
Dajatve bodo pobrane samo v morebitnih izrednih primerih, ko bo cena franko meja Skupnosti uvoza iz Norveške nižja od MUC in takrat le v višini, ki bo ustrezala razliki med uvozno ceno in MUC.
In addition, the whole salmon market from production to deliveries to consumers will be governed by fair competition.
Poleg tega bodo celoten trg lososa od proizvodnje do dobave potrošnikom urejala pravila poštene konkurence.
These conditions will allow for costs to be duly reflected on the sales prices at each level of the distribution chain.
Zaradi teh pogojev se bodo stroški ustrezno odražali v prodajnih cenah na vsaki stopnji distribucijske verige.
Users may also expect an increased possibility of supplies from EU sources and from other third countries, once the market will be recovering from the effects of injurious dumping.
Ko si bo trg opomogel od učinkov škodljivega dampinga, bodo uporabniki imeli večjo možnost dobave iz EU in drugih tretjih držav.
Indeed, when all operators in the market enjoy sound market conditions governed by fair trade, the largest choices of products and qualities are available from various sources of supply.
Ko bodo vsi dobavitelji na trgu uživali ugodne tržne pogoje v okviru poštene trgovine, bo dejansko na voljo največja izbira proizvodov vseh kakovosti iz različnih virov dobave.
Prices being set according to market signals should have a positive impact on the production and distribution chains, allowing more price and cost stability and predictability.
Cene, določene v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, bi morale pozitivno vplivati na proizvodnjo in distribucijske verige, kar bi omogočilo večjo stabilnost cen in stroškov ter predvidljivost.
If no measures are imposed and if the price for Norwegian exports were permitted to drop back to previously dumped low levels, users may be allowed to profit from unfairly dumped imports for a while.
Če ne bodo uvedeni nobeni ukrepi in se bo cena za izvoz iz Norveške lahko zopet zmanjšala na prejšnjo nizko dampinško raven, bodo uporabniki lahko za določen čas imeli koristi od nepoštenega dampinškega uvoza.
The market, however, will not sustain this situation for a long time.
Vendar pa se ta položaj na trgu ne bo ohranil dolgo časa.
Salmon prices to users will be below the costs of producers for deliveries on the Community market.
Cene lososa bodo za uporabnike nižje od stroškov proizvajalcev za dobavo na trg Skupnosti.
If dumping is allowed to recur, Norwegian imports representing around 60 % of Community consumption will prevent exports from non-dumped third country sources.
V primeru možnosti ponovnega dampinga bo zaradi uvoza iz Norveške, ki predstavlja približno 60 % potrošnje Skupnosti, onemogočen izvoz iz nedampinških virov iz tretjih držav.
Users will not have the choice of obtaining alternative supplies and quality.
Uporabniki ne bodo imeli možnosti drugih dobav in različnih kakovosti.
The fact that prices will not be set according to market signals will lead to price volatility and negative influence on final products to consumers.
Ker cene ne bodo določene v skladu s tržnimi razmerami, bo to povzročilo nihanje cen in bo negativno vplivalo na končni proizvod za potrošnike.
This may ultimately affect processors’ profitability.
To lahko navsezadnje vpliva na dobičkonosnost predelovalcev.
Therefore, the application of a MIP will on the one hand have only minor cost implications for importers and processors.
Zato bo imela uporaba MUC po eni strani samo manjši vpliv na stroške uvoznikov in predelovalcev.
Indeed, whilst market prices remain above the MIP, there will be no financial implications at all.
Dejansko sploh ne bo nobenih finančnih posledic, če bodo tržne cene ostale višje od MUC.
On the other hand, it is considered that such market conditions should also prevent any delocalisation as import duties on processed salmon are high.
Po drugi strani se meni, da bi morali taki tržni pogoji preprečiti tudi preselitev proizvodnje, saj so uvozne dajatve na predelanega lososa visoke.
Therefore, the processing industry in the Community should continue to have access to an adequate supply of raw material.
Zato bi morala predelovalna industrija Skupnosti še naprej imeti dostop do zadostnega obsega dobave surovin.
As set out in recital 140 below, the Commission undertakes to monitor the developments in the farmed salmon market in the Community.
Kakor je določeno v uvodni izjavi (140) v nadaljevanju, se Komisija obveže, da bo spremljala dogajanje na trgu gojenega lososa v Skupnosti.
Where on the basis of this monitoring, there is prima facie evidence that the existing measure is no longer necessary or sufficient to counteract injurious dumping, the Commission may consider initiating a review on the basis of Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation and conducting the investigation expeditiously.
Kadar bodo na podlagi tega spremljanja obstajali prima facie dokazi, da obstoječi ukrep ni več potreben ali za preprečevanje škodljivega dampinga ne zadostuje več, lahko Komisija začne pregled na podlagi člena 11(3) osnovne uredbe in v najhitrejšem možnem času izvede preiskavo.
This will allow the Commission to react quickly, should market prices fall for a longer period of time below the level of the MIP.
Tako se bo lahko Komisija hitro odzvala v primeru, ko bodo tržne cene dlje časa nižje od MUC.
There has been some debate with interested parties on the question of future employment levels.
Z zainteresiranimi strankami je potekala razprava glede prihodnje ravni zaposlenosti.
However, as with the analysis of the cost implication of the measures, there is no evidence that the impact on employment in this sector by any anti-dumping measure on imports of salmon from Norway will be anything other than small.
Vendar pa tako kot v primeru analize vpliva ukrepov na stroške ni dokazov, da bo vpliv protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz lososa iz Norveške na zaposlovanje v tem sektorju velik.
The further investigation confirmed that the MIP and its proposed level is the most appropriate form of the measure (see below at recital 128).
Nadaljnja preiskava je potrdila, da je MUC in predlagana raven MUC najprimernejša oblika ukrepanja (glej uvodno izjavo (128) v nadaljevanju).
Therefore, with a MIP the disadvantages likely to be suffered by importers/processors/users, if any, are not considered such as to outweigh the benefits expected to accrue to the Community producers as a consequence of the anti-dumping measures which are considered the minimum necessary to remedy the serious injury suffered and prevent further serious deterioration in the situation of the Community producers.
Zato se ocenjuje, da kakršna koli škoda, ki bi jo morda utrpeli uvozniki/predelovalci/uporabniki zaradi MUC, ne bo večja od koristi, ki bi jih po pričakovanjih imeli proizvajalci Skupnosti zaradi protidampinških ukrepov, za katere se meni, da so najmanj, kar je potrebno za odpravo resne škode in preprečitev nadaljnjega poslabšanja položaja proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
In addition, it should be noted that separate sources of supply from other third countries also remain available.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da so še vedno na razpolago ločeni viri dobave iz drugih tretjih držav.
In the absence of any further substantiated comments submitted with respect to the interest of unrelated importers and processors (users), the findings as set out in recital 128 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile predložene nadaljnje utemeljene pripombe glede interesa nepovezanih uvoznikov in predelovalcev (uporabnikov), se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (128) začasne uredbe.
Interest of producers of smolt and feed, suppliers and producers in the EC related to Norwegian producers/importers
Interes proizvajalcev dveletnega lososa in krme, dobaviteljev in proizvajalcev v ES, povezanih z norveškimi proizvajalci/uvozniki
In the absence of any substantiated comments submitted with respect to the interests of producers of smolt and feed, suppliers and producers in the EC related to Norwegian producers/importers, the findings as set out in recitals 117 to 121 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile predložene utemeljene pripombe glede interesa proizvajalcev dveletnega lososa in krme, dobaviteljev in proizvajalcev v ES, povezanih z norveškimi proizvajalci/uvozniki, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (117) do (121) začasne uredbe.
As the product concerned is a consumer product, the Commission informed various consumer organisations of the opening of an investigation.
Ker je zadevni proizvod potrošniški proizvod, je Komisija obvestila različne potrošniške organizacije o začetku preiskave.
A response was received from one party which claimed that the nutritional beneficial effects of salmon are widely recognised and that artificially increasing the price would make good nutrition choices more difficult for consumers.
Prispel je odgovor ene stranke, ki je trdila, da so koristni hranilni učinki lososa široko priznani in da bi umetno povišanje cene otežilo izbiro dobre prehrane potrošnikov.
Concern was also expressed that any increase in prices would make farmed salmon less affordable and stifle market growth in those Member States with a lower than average gross domestic product per head (GDP).
Izražena je bila tudi skrb, da bi kakršno koli povišanje cen povzročilo, da si gojenega lososa potrošniki ne bi mogli več privoščiti v enaki meri, kar bi zadušilo rast trga v državah članicah z nižjim povprečnim bruto domačim proizvodom na prebivalca (BDP).
It is considered that if anti-dumping measures are imposed, economic operators will continue to have access to unlimited quantities of imports, albeit at fair prices.
Ocenjuje se, da bodo z morebitno uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov gospodarski subjekti še naprej imeli dostop do neomejenega obsega uvoza, vendar po poštenih cenah.
Further, given the magnitude of the margins between the whole fish ex-farm and the retail price of processed salmon products, it is considered that the measures are unlikely to have a material effect on retail prices, since it is unlikely that the full price increase, if any, will be passed on to consumers.
Nadalje ukrepi glede na razliko med ceno cele ribe v ribogojnicah in maloprodajno ceno proizvodov predelanega lososa verjetno ne bodo znatno vplivali na maloprodajno ceno, saj je malo verjetno, da se bo karšno koli zvišanje celotne cene preneslo na potrošnike.
Indeed, at current market prices which are well above the MIP, there would be no impact at all.
Dejansko pri obstoječih tržnih cenah, ki so veliko višje od MUC, ukrepi sploh ne bodo imeli nobenega vpliva.
The impact on consumers, even in a worst case scenario, is therefore likely to be small.
Vpliv na potrošnike bo tudi v najslabšem primeru verjetno majhen.
In addition, loss-making price levels are probably not sustainable in the medium to long term.
Poleg tega se ravni cen, ki prinašajo izgubo, srednjeročno in dolgoročno verjetno ne bodo obdržale.
On that basis, it is not expected that anti-dumping measures would have any significant negative consequences for consumers.
Na podlagi tega se pričakuje, da protidampinški ukrepi ne bodo imeli znatnih negativnih posledic za potrošnike.
In view of the conclusions drawn in the provisional Regulation and taking into account the submissions made by the various parties and the results of the further investigation, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose definitive anti-dumping measures against dumped imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve začasne uredbe ter ob upoštevanju stališč različnih strank in rezultatov nadaljnje preiskave, se sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov na dampinški uvoz gojenega lososa s poreklom iz Norveške.
The conclusion as set out in recital 131 of the provisional Regulation is therefore confirmed.
Zato se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (131) začasne uredbe.
Form of the definitive measures
Oblika dokončnih ukrepov
In view of the definitive conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest, anti-dumping measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na dokončne ugotovitve v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzročno zvezo in interesom Skupnosti je treba uvesti protidampinške ukrepe, da bi preprečili nadaljnjo škodo, ki jo industriji Skupnosti povzroča dampinški uvoz.
Account has been taken of both the dumping margins found and the amounts of duty necessary to eliminate the injury sustained by the Community industry.
Upoštevali so se ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in zneski dajatve, potrebne za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
It has been found that all injury margins were above 2,0 % and could therefore not be considered as de minimis.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila stopnja škode v vseh primerih višja od 2,0 %, zato je ni bilo možno obravnavati kot de minimis stopnjo.
The weighted average injury margin, which was below the weighted average dumping margin, was found to be 14,6 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je tehtano povprečje stopnje škode, ki je bilo nižje od tehtanega povprečja stopnje dampinga, znašalo 14,6 %.
However, following disclosure of facts leading to the adoption of the amending Regulation, some interested parties explicitly rejected ad valorem duties and welcomed the introduction of a MIP.
Vendar pa so po razkritju dejstev, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta uredba o spremembi, nekatere zainteresirane stranke izrecno zavrnile dajatve ad valorem in pozdravile uvedbo MUC.
Therefore, in light of these comments received and the findings of the further investigation, the MIP as the appropriate form of the measure is confirmed.
Zato se MUC na podlagi prejetih pripomb in ugotovitev nadaljnje preiskave potrdi kot primerna oblika ukrepanja.
In accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, the definitive duty should be set at the level of the dumping or injury margins, whichever is the lower.
V skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba dokončno dajatev določiti na stopnji dampinga ali škode, pri čemer se upošteva nižjo stopnjo.
In order to apply this rule, a non-injurious MIP was established.
Za uporabo tega pravila je bil določen neškodljivi MUC.
In order to verify this method, company specific non-dumped MIPs were also calculated on the basis of normal value, adjusted to the net free-at-Community-border price.
Da bi preverili to metodo, je bil na podlagi normalne vrednosti, prilagojene neto ceni franko meja Skupnosti, izračunan poseben nedampinški MUC za posamezne družbe.
These were compared with the non-injurious MIP calculated according to the methodology set out at recital 131.
Ta MUC se je primerjal z neškodljivim MUC, ki je bil izračunan v skladu z metodologijo, določeno v uvodni izjavi (131).
In all cases it was found that the non-injurious MIP was lower than the non-dumped MIP.
V vseh primerih je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neškodljivi MUC nižji od nedampinškega MUC.
In calculating non-dumped MIPs, a conversion from Norwegian kroner to euro had to be made.
Pri izračunu nedampinškega MUC, je bilo treba norveške krone preračunati v eure.
At the provisional stage, the Commission used three-year average currency exchange rates for this conversion.
V začasni fazi je Komisija uporabila triletni povprečni menjalni tečaj za to menjavo.
Several companies claimed that the correct rate should be that which applied during the IP.
Več družb je trdilo, da bi moral pravi tečaj biti tisti, ki se je uporabljal v OP.
In response to this claim, the Commission again notes that three years is the average production cycle for salmon.
Na podlagi te trditve Komisija zopet opozarja, da je triletno obdobje običajen proizvodni ciklus pri proizvodnji lososa.
As a number of important costs which are included in the normal value are incurred over this production cycle, the Commission considers that three-year average rates are appropriate when calculating non-dumped MIPs.
Ker številni znatni stroški, ki so vključeni v normalno vrednost, nastanejo med tem proizvodnim ciklusom, Komisija meni, da so triletne povprečne stopnje primerne za izračun nedampinškega MUC.
The claim is, therefore, rejected.
Zahtevek se zato zavrne.