natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1998/2005 (OJ L 320, 8.12.2005, p. 42).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1998/2005 (UL L 320, 8.12.2005, str. 42).
to the Commission Regulation of 18 January 2006 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 18. januarja 2006 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Turkey carcases, known as 80 % turkeys, frozen
Kosi purana, oskubljeni in očiščeni, brez glav in nog, vendar z vratovi, srčki, jetri in želodčki, znani kot ‚80 % purani‘, zamrznjeni
Origin of imports:01 Brazil02 Thailand03 Argentina04 Chile.’
Poreklo izvoza:01 Brazilija02 Tajska03 Argentina04 Čile.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 83/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 83/2006
fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 19 January 2006
o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil v sektorju za perutninsko meso, ki se začnejo uporabljati 19. januarja 2006
Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 19 January 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za perutninsko meso od 19. januarja 2006
A24, Angola, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq and Iran.
A24, Angola, Saudova Arabija, Kuvajt, Bahrajn, Katar, Oman, Združeni arabski emirati, Jordanija, Jemen, Libanon, Irak, Iran.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 84/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 84/2006
On 14 December 2005, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council amended the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov je 14. decembra 2005 spremenil seznam fizičnih in pravnih oseb, subjektov in organov, za katere naj velja zamrznitev finančnih sredstev in gospodarskih virov.
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1183/2005 se spremeni, kakor je določeno v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1824/2005 (OJ L 294, 10.11.2005, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1824/2005 (UL L 294, 10.11.2005, str. 3).
Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is amended as follows:
Priloga I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1183/2005 se spremeni:
The entry ‘Dr Ignace Murwanashy-Aka (alias Ignace).
Vnos „Dr. Ignace Murwanashy-Aka (alias Ignace).
Resident in Germany’ shall be replaced by the following:
Rezident Nemčije“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Dr Ignace Murwanashyaka (alias Ignace).
Dr. Ignace Murwanashyaka (alias Ignace).
Date of birth: 14.5.1963.
Datum rojstva: 14.5.1963.
Place of birth: Butera, Rwanda.
Kraj rojstva: Butera, Ruanda.
Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 85/2006
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve in dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve, uvedene na uvoz gojenega lososa s poreklom iz Norveške
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 9 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
Following the initiation [2] of an anti-dumping investigation on 23 October 2004, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 628/2005 [3], imposed provisional anti-dumping duties on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway (Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty or provisional Regulation).
Komisija je po začetku [2] protidampinške preiskave 23. oktobra 2004 z Uredbo (ES) št. 628/2005 [3] uvedla začasne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz gojenega lososa s poreklom iz Norveške („uredba o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve“ ali „začasna uredba“).
The provisional anti-dumping duties which took the form of ad valorem duties ranging between 6,8 % and 24,5 % for the imported products applied as of 27 April 2005.
Začasne protidampinške dajatve, katerim je bila določena oblika ad valorem, se gibljejo med 6,8 % in 24,5 % vrednosti uvoženih proizvodov in veljajo od 27. aprila 2005.
On 1 July 2005, by Regulation (EC) No 1010/2005 [4] (amending Regulation), the Commission changed the form of the provisional measures by replacing the ad valorem duties by a minimum import price (MIP) of EUR 2,81 per kilogram whole fish equivalent (WFE) and extended the duration of the provisional measures for a further three months, by amending the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty.
julija 2005 je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 1010/2005 [4] („uredba o spremembi“) spremenila obliko začasnih ukrepov z nadomestitvijo dajatev ad valorem z minimalno uvozno ceno („MUC“) v višini 2,81 EUR na kilogram ekvivalenta cele ribe („WFE“) in s spremembo uredbe o uvedbi začasne dajatve podaljšala obdobje veljavnosti začasnih ukrepov za nadaljnje tri mesece.
Following the publication of the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty, parties received disclosure of facts and considerations on which the provisional Regulation was based.
Po objavi uredbe o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve so bili strankam posredovani dejstva in premisleki, na katerih je temeljila začasna uredba.
Some parties submitted comments in writing.
Nekatere stranke so predložile pisne pripombe.
All interested parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam je bila na zahtevo dana možnost za zaslišanje pri Komisiji.
Following the publication of the amending Regulation, all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on which the amendment of the provisional Regulation was based.
Po objavi uredbe o spremembi so bile vse stranke obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na katerih je temeljila sprememba začasne uredbe.
Similarly, all parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it is intended to recommend the imposition of definitive anti-dumping measures and the modalities on the collection of amounts secured by way of provisional duties.
Prav tako so bile vse stranke obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih se nameravajo priporočiti uvedba dokončnih protidampinških ukrepov in načini pobiranja zneskov, zavarovanih z začasnimi dajatvami.
They were also granted a period within which to make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Odobren jim je bil tudi rok, v katerem so lahko podale svoja stališča v zvezi s tem razkritjem.
The oral and written comments submitted by the interested parties were considered and, where appropriate, taken into account for the definitive findings.
Ustne in pisne pripombe, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane stranke, so bile proučene in po potrebi upoštevane v dokončnih ugotovitvah.
The Commission continued to seek all information it deemed necessary for the purpose of its definitive findings.
Komisija je nadaljevala s pridobivanjem vseh informacij, za katere je menila, da so potrebne za njene dokončne ugotovitve.
In addition to the verification visits undertaken at the premises of the companies mentioned in recital 7 of the Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty, it should be noted that after the imposition of provisional measures, additional on-spot visits were carried out at the premises of the following Community users and associations of Community users:
Treba je opozoriti, da so bili po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov poleg preveritvenih obiskov, ki so bili opravljeni v prostorih družb, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (7) uredbe o uvedbi začasne protidampinške dajatve, izvedeni obiski na kraju samem v prostorih naslednjih uporabnikov Skupnosti in združenj uporabnikov Skupnosti:
Norlax, Outrup, Denmark,
Norlax, Outrup, Danska,
SIF France, Boulogne-sur-Mer, France,
SIF France, Boulogne-sur-Mer, Francija,
Association of Danish Fish Processing Industries and Exporters, Copenhagen, Denmark,
Združenje danskih industrij za predelavo rib in izvoznikov, Kopenhagen, Danska,
Bundesverband der Deutschen Fischindustrie und des Fischgroßhandels, Hamburg, Germany,
Bundesverband der Deutschen Fischindustrie und des Fischgroßhandels, Hamburg, Nemčija,
Polish Association of Fish Processors, Koszalin, Poland,
Poljsko združenje predelovalcev rib, Koszalin, Poljska,
Syndicat national du saumon et de la truite fumés, Paris, France.
Syndicat national du saumon et de la truite fumés, Pariz, Francija.
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
ZADEVNI PROIZVOD IN PODOBNI PROIZVOD
Since no comments were received regarding the product concerned and like product, the contents and provisional conclusions of recitals 10 to 14 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker glede zadevnega proizvoda in podobnega proizvoda niso bile prejete nobene pripombe, se potrdijo vsebina in začasne ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (10) do (14) začasne uredbe.
As outlined in recital 18 of the provisional Regulation, it was provisionally not possible for two companies to be given an individual dumping margin at that time.
Kakor je opisano v uvodni izjavi (18) začasne uredbe, v tistem času dvema družbama začasno ni bilo mogoče odobriti individualne stopnje dampinga.
However, as indicated, the Commission continued to investigate this issue at the definitive stage of the proceeding.
Kot je navedeno, pa je Komisija nadaljevala s preiskavo te zadeve v zaključni fazi postopka.
The two companies concerned have subsequently provided the necessary information to allow an individual definitive determination to be made for them.
Dve zadevni družbi sta naknadno predložili potrebne informacije, kar je v njunem primeru omogočilo sprejetje individualnih dokončnih ugotovitev.
In the absence of any further comments on sampling, the provisional conclusions as set out in recitals 16 and 17 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih nadaljnjih pripomb v zvezi z vzorčenjem, se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (16) in (17) začasne uredbe.
Following disclosure of the provisional determinations, no comments were received concerning the methodology used to determine the normal value for Norwegian exporters.
Po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev niso bile prejete nobene pripombe v zvezi z metodologijo, ki je bila uporabljena za določitev normalne vrednosti v primeru norveških izvoznikov.
Accordingly, the provisional conclusions in this respect, as set out in recitals 19 to 31 of the provisional Regulation are definitively confirmed.
V skladu s tem se dokončno potrdijo začasne ugotovitve v zvezi z metodologijo, kot je določeno v uvodnih izjavah (19) do (31) začasne uredbe.
A number of comments were, however, made in respect of the treatment of certain cost items when constructing normal value in line with the methodology set out in recital 26 of the provisional Regulation.
Vendar pa so bile prejete številne pripombe glede obravnave postavk stroškov pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti v skladu z metodologijo, določeno v uvodni izjavi (26) začasne uredbe.
Where constructed normal value was used, the Commission calculated the costs involved in producing the product concerned during the IP.
Kadar je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost, je Komisija izračunala stroške za proizvodnjo zadevnega proizvoda v OP.
Where costs could be attributed directly, the actual costs were taken into account.
Kadar so se stroški lahko pripisali neposredno, so se upoštevali dejanski stroški.
Where this was not possible, costs were allocated on the basis of the historical allocation utilised by the company concerned, where such information was available and demonstrated by the company; or in the absence of such information, on the basis of turnover, in line with Article 2(5) of the basic Regulation.
Kadar to ni bilo možno, so bili stroški porazdeljeni na podlagi predhodnih porazdelitev, ki jih je zadevna družba uporabila, če je bila taka informacija na voljo in jo je družba posredovala; če take informacije ni bilo na voljo, pa so bili stroški porazdeljeni na podlagi prometa v skladu s členom 2(5) osnovne uredbe.
Where certain cost elements could not be directly calculated for the IP, such costs were assessed on the basis of the most recently available audited accounts.
Kadar dela stroškov za OP ni bilo mogoče izračunati neposredno, so se ti stroški ocenili na podlagi najnovejših revidiranih izkazov.
Extraordinary expenses
Izredni odhodki
At the provisional stage, the Commission included all extraordinary expenses applicable to the product concerned, which had been reported by companies during the IP.
Komisija je v začasni fazi upoštevala vse izredne odhodke v zvezi z zadevnim proizvodom, o katerih so med OP poročale družbe.
These extraordinary expenses relate to a number of company-specific costs, but typically include write-downs of tangible assets, closure of farming facilities, slaughtering and processing plants, and severance payments to employees.
Ti izredni odhodki so povezani s številnimi posebnimi stroški družbe, ki običajno vključujejo odpisane zneske opredmetenih sredstev, zaprtje ribogojnic, klavnic in predelovalnih obratov ter odpravnine za zaposlene.
Several companies challenged this treatment on two grounds.
To obravnavo je več družb izpodbijalo iz dveh razlogov.
Firstly, it was claimed that extraordinary costs should not be included at all, as they were said to be non-recurring costs which should be completely excluded from the normal cost of production for salmon.
Prvič, zahtevalo se je, da se izredni stroški sploh ne smejo upoštevati, saj naj bi bili to enkratni stroški, ki bi jih bilo treba v celoti izključiti iz običajnih stroškov proizvodnje lososa.
Secondly, were it considered that these costs should be included, then there should be some allocation of these costs over the true period of time to which they relate, e.g. the useful life of a processing plant when the extraordinary expense relates to such an asset.
Drugič, če bi te stroške kljub vsemu upoštevali, potem bi morali biti razporejeni v dejanskem časovnem obdobju, na katerega se nanašajo, na primer v življenjski dobi predelovalnega obrata, kadar se izredni odhodek nanaša na to premoženje.
In respect of the claim that the totality of all extraordinary expenses should be excluded, the Commission notes that the salmon industry in Norway has been restructuring for a number of years.
Glede zahtevka o izključitvi vseh izrednih odhodkov Komisija ugotavlja, da se industrija lososa na Norveškem že vrsto let preoblikuje.
Accordingly, extraordinary costs have been reported by many of the companies over a number of financial years.
V skladu s tem je večje število družb poročalo o izrednih odhodkih v obdobju več proračunskih let.
It is, therefore, clear that the extraordinary costs in question are not isolated non-recurring costs restricted to a few companies.
Zato je jasno, da zadevni izredni stroški niso posamezni enkratni stroški, omejeni na nekaj družb.
Rather, they appear to be systemic costs associated with the production of salmon.
Videti je, da so to sistemski stroški, povezani s proizvodnjo lososa.
To exclude all of these costs would result in an understatement in the true cost of production, thus this claim had to be rejected.
Če bi omenjene stroške izključili, bi to povzročilo nižje dejanske stroške proizvodnje, zato je bilo treba ta zahtevek zavrniti.
In respect of the second claim, the Commission notes that the extraordinary costs that were included for the provisional determinations equal those costs actually declared by the companies during the IP, on the basis of financial decisions taken by those companies.
Glede drugega zahtevka Komisija ugotavlja, da izredni stroški, upoštevani pri začasnih ugotovitvah, ustrezajo stroškom, ki so jih družbe v OP dejansko prijavile na podlagi svojih finančnih odločitev.
The Commission, therefore, followed the approach taken by the companies themselves.
Zato je Komisija sledila pristopu, ki so ga uporabile družbe.
It is, however, true that allocation of the costs over a period of time would remove any undue effect caused by the timing of the decisions of the companies to report these costs.
Res pa je, da bi porazdelitev stroškov v določenem časovnem obdobju odpravila vse nezaželene učinke, ki jih povzroči časovna neusklajenost družb pri sprejemanju odločitev o poročanju teh stroškov.
Ideally, all extraordinary costs reported for each separate asset should be allocated over the useful life of that asset to arrive at an average annual cost.
Najbolje bi bilo, da bi se vsi izredni stroški za vsako posamezno premoženje porazdelili v življenjski dobi tega premoženja, da bi dobili povprečne letne stroške.
However, it is to be noted that none of the companies concerned carried out this exercise.
Vendar pa je treba opomniti, da nobena zadevna družba tega ni izvedla.
Instead, the Commission has decided to take the extraordinary costs reported by companies in the sample during the last three years, based on the most recently available financial statements, and to allocate one third of these costs to salmon production in the IP, on the basis of turnover.
Zato se je Komisija odločila, da tretjino izrednih stroškov, o katerih so v zadnjih treh letih poročale vzorčene družbe in temeljijo na najnovejših računovodskih izkazih, dodeli za proizvodnjo lososa v OP na podlagi prometa.
Three years was considered an appropriate time period as this is the average length of time that it takes to grow a salmon from a smolt to a harvestable salmon.
Triletno obdobje se je štelo za ustrezno časovno obdobje, saj je to povprečno časovno obdobje, ki je potrebno za gojenje lososa, in sicer od dveletnega lososa do odraslega lososa.
Write-down of licences and financial expenses
Odpis licenc in finančnih stroškov
Several companies also claimed that write-downs of salmon farming licences and financial expenses should not be included in the cost of production of salmon.
Več družb je tudi zahtevalo, da se odpisi licenc za gojenje lososa in finančnih stroškov ne smejo upoštevati pri stroških proizvodnje lososa.
In respect of the write-down valuation of licences, it is noted that a valid licence is a legal requirement in Norway in order to farm salmon.
Glede vrednotenja odpisa licenc je treba opomniti, da je na Norveškem veljavna licenca pravna obveznost za gojenje lososa.
In respect of the write-down of financial expenses, it is noted that these expenses relate mainly to the deployment of free-cash, frequently via loans to related companies also involved in the salmon industry, and that the companies concerned are not financial investment companies.
Glede odpisa finančnih stroškov je treba opomniti, da so ti stroški v glavnem povezani z dodelitvijo razpoložljivih denarnih sredstev, pogosto v obliki posojil povezanim družbam, ki se tudi ukvarjajo z gojenjem lososa, in da se zadevne družbe ne ukvarjajo s finančnimi naložbami.
For these reasons, the Commission confirms that these write-downs relate to expenses that are incurred and must be borne by the companies concerned.
Zaradi tega Komisija potrjuje, da ti odpisi zadevajo že nastale odhodke, ki jih morajo kriti zadevne družbe.
It is further confirmed that these costs should be attributed to the prime business activities including salmon farming, thus the claim is rejected.
Potrjuje tudi, da je treba te stroške pripisati osnovnim poslovnim dejavnostim, vključno z gojenjem lososa, zato se zahtevek zavrne.
As with extraordinary expenses, it was also considered appropriate to have one third of all costs incurred by the relevant companies in the last three years allocated to salmon production, on the basis of turnover.
Tako kot v primeru izrednih odhodkov se je zdelo ustrezno, da se tretjina nastalih stroškov zadevnih družb v zadnjih treh letih dodeli za proizvodnjo lososa na podlagi prometa.
Write-down of biomass
Odpis biomase
Two companies in the sample claimed that write-downs of the values of biomass should not be included in the cost of salmon production.
Dve vzorčeni družbi sta zahtevali, da se odpisi vrednosti biomase ne upoštevajo pri stroških proizvodnje lososa.
It was claimed that these write-downs refer to accounting adjustments based on the projected future sales value of salmon, and are not a true cost.
Trdili so, da ti odpisi zadevajo računovodske uskladitve, ki so temeljile na načrtovani prihodnji prodajni vrednosti in niso dejanski strošek.
Where the companies were able to demonstrate that these write-downs were indeed simply a result of changing market values and not due to any other factor, such as escapes, mortality or disease, the Commission concluded that these costs should not be included for the normal value calculation, and to this extent the claim of the sampled companies was accepted.
Kadar so družbe lahko dokazale, da so ti odpisi dejansko samo posledica spreminjajoče se tržne vrednosti in ne kakršnega koli drugega dejavnika, na primer uhajanj, pogina ali bolezni, je Komisija sklenila, da se ti stroški ne upoštevajo pri izračunu normalne vrednosti, zato je bil zahtevek vzorčenih družb v tem okviru sprejet.
Transfer price of raw materials
Transferne cene surovin
It was claimed that the profit margin of the related companies should be deducted when assessing the cost of raw materials purchased from such parties.
Zahtevalo se je, da se stopnja dobička zadevnih družb pri ocenjevanju stroškov surovin, kupljenih pri teh družbah, odšteje.
It was argued that this approach would be consistent with the approach taken for integrated companies, where only the production cost, net of profit, is included in the cost calculation of finished products.
Trdilo se je, da bi bil ta pristop v skladu s pristopom do pridruženih družb, ko se pri izračunu stroškov končnih proizvodov upošteva samo neto strošek proizvodnje.
In this case, the claim centres mainly on the purchases of smolt from companies related to those in the sample.
V tem primeru se zahtevek osredotoča v glavnem na nakupe dveletnega lososa od družb, povezanih z vzorčenimi družbami.
In response to this claim, it must be noted that the Community institutions were not in a position to verify the cost of production of the smolt, as this information was not provided by the companies.
Na podlagi tega zahtevka je treba opozoriti, da institucije Skupnosti niso imele možnosti preveriti stroškov proizvodnje dveletnega lososa, ker družbe teh informacij niso predložile.
Accordingly, any profit, or indeed loss, on these related inter-company sales could not be assessed.
V skladu s tem kakršen koli dobiček ali celo izgubo pri teh povezanih prodajah med družbami ni bilo mogoče oceniti.
Moreover, there was no evidence to suggest that the use of these transfer prices affected the reliability of the constructed normal value for salmon.
Poleg tega ni bilo dokazov, ki bi nakazovali, da je uporaba teh transfernih cen vplivala na zanesljivost konstruirane normalne vrednosti lososa.
Accordingly, this claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba njihov zahtevek zavrniti.
Feed costs
Stroški za krmo
It was claimed for some companies that too high a feed cost had been used.
Trdilo se je, da se je v primeru nekaterih družb uporabil previsok strošek za krmo.
In particular, it was claimed that the feed cost in relation to fishes which die prior to harvesting was included in both the feed cost of harvested fish, as well as entered into the costs associated with mortality.
Zlasti se je trdilo, da se je strošek za krmo v zvezi z ribami, ki poginejo pred ulovom, upošteval pri strošku za krmo ulovljenih rib in pri stroških, povezanih s poginom.