natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
≤ 50 m2and Peak SPR ≤ 0,25 m2/ss1a s1 and transmittance in accordance with EN 61034-2 ≥ 80 %s1b s1 and transmittance in accordance with EN 61034-2 ≥ 60 % < 80 %s2 TSP1200 ≤ 400 m2and Peak SPR ≤ 1,5 m2/ss3 not s1 or s2
≤ 50 m2in najvišja SPR ≤ 0,25 m2/ss1a s1 in prepustnost v skladu z EN 61034-2 ≥ 80 %s1b s1 in prepustnost v skladu z EN 61034-2 ≥ 60 % < 80 %s2 TSP1200 ≤ 400 m2in najvišja SPR ≤ 1,5 m2/ss3 ne s1 ali s2.
For FIPEC20 Scenarios 1 and 2: d0 = No flaming droplets/particles within 1200 s; d1 = No flaming droplets/particles persisting longer than 10 s within 1200 s; d2 = not d0 or d1.
Za FIPEC20 scenarija 1 in 2: d0 = brez gorečih kapljic/delcev v času 1200 s; d1 = brez gorečih kapljic/delcev, obstojnih dlje kot 10 s v času 1200 s; d2 = ne d0 ali d1.
EN 50267-2-3: a1 = conductivity < 2,5 μS/mm and pH > 4,3; a2 = conductivity < 10 μS/mm and pH > 4,3; a3 = not a1 or a2.
EN 50267-2-3: a1 = prevodnost < 2,5 μS/mm in pH > 4,3; a2 = prevodnost < 10 μS/mm in pH > 4,3; a3 = ne a1 ali a2.
No declaration = No Performance Determined.
Brez deklaracije = odpornost ni določena.
Air flow into chamber shall be set to 8000 ± 800 l/min.FIPEC20 Scenario 1 = prEN 50399-2-1 with mounting and fixing as belowFIPEC20 Scenario 2 = prEN 50399-2-2 with mounting and fixing as below
Pretok zraka v komoro se nastavi na 8000 ± 800 l/min.FIPEC20 scenarij 1 = prEN 50399-2-1 z namestitvijo in pritrditvijo kot spodaj.FIPEC20 scenarij 2 = prEN 50399-2-2 z namestitvijo in pritrditvijo kot spodaj.
The smoke class declared for class B1ca cables must originate from the FIPEC20 Scen 2 test.
Razred dima, ki je določen za kable razreda B1ca, mora izhajati iz preskusa FIPEC20 Scen 2.
The smoke class declared for class B2ca, Cca, Dca cables must originate from the FIPEC20 Scen 1 test.
Razred dima, ki je določen za kable razreda B2ca, Cca, Dca, mora izhajati iz preskusa FIPEC20 Scen 1.
Measuring the hazardous properties of gases developed in the event of fire, which compromise the ability of the persons exposed to them to take effective action to accomplish escape, and not describing the toxicity of these gases.
Merjenje nevarnih lastnosti plinov, ki nastanejo pri požaru in ki ogrožajo sposobnost oseb, izpostavljenih tem plinom, za uspešen izhod v sili, ne pa opisovanje toksičnosti teh plinov.
of 3 November 2006
z dne 3. novembra 2006
establishing the sites for the Visa Information System during the development phase
o določitvi lokacij za vizumski informacijski sistem med razvojno fazo
(notified under document number C(2006) 5161)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2006) 5161)
(Only the Czech, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedila v angleškem, češkem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, grškem, italijanskem, latvijskem, litovskem, madžarskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, poljskem, portugalskem, slovaškem, slovenskem, španskem in švedskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) [1], and in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2004/512/ES z dne 8. junija 2004 o vzpostavitvi vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) [1] in zlasti člena 3 Odločbe,
It is necessary for the development of the VIS including its communication network to determine the location of its central system and backup central system.
Za razvoj VIS in njegovega komunikacijskega omrežja je treba določiti lokacijo njegovega centralnega sistema in lokacijo nadomestnega centralnega sistema.
The Council conclusions of 20 February 2004 on the development of the Visa Information System (VIS) stated that the VIS should be based on a centralised architecture and have a common technical platform with the SIS II and it should be hosted in the same location as the SIS II central system.
V sklepih Sveta z dne 20. februarja 2004 o razvoju vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) je bilo navedeno, da bi moral biti VIS zasnovan na centralizirani sistemski arhitekturi in imeti skupno tehnično platformo s SIS II ter da bi ga bilo treba vzpostaviti na isti lokaciji kot centralni sistem SIS II.
The Council conclusions of 29 April 2004 on the Schengen information system stated that the central part of SIS II should be located in Strasbourg and the business continuity site should be located in Salzburg.
V sklepih Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o schengenskem informacijskem sistemu je bilo navedeno, da bi moral osrednji del sistema SIS II biti nameščen v Strasbourgu, sistem poslovne kontinuitete pa v Salzburgu.
Appropriate arrangements should hereafter be put in place between the Commission and the Member States hosting the central system and the backup system of the VIS during its development.
Zato je treba določiti odnose med Komisijo in državama članicama, ki bosta gostili centralni sistem in nadomestni centralni sistem VIS med njegovim razvojem.
These arrangements should, in particular, specify the conditions governing the relationships between the different parties, access to the sites for relevant bodies and personnel and the local support to be provided by the hosting Member States.
Te določbe bi morale zlasti opredeliti pogoje, ki urejajo odnose med različnimi strankami, dostop zadevnih organov in osebja do lokacij ter lokalno podporo, ki jo morata zagotoviti državi članici gostiteljici.
This Decision is without prejudice to the adoption in the future of the legislative instruments for the establishment, operations, use and location of the VIS.
Ta odločba ne posega v sprejemanje prihodnjih zakonodajnih instrumentov za vzpostavljanje, delovanje, uporabo in lokacijo VIS.
In accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [2], the United Kingdom has not taken part in the adoption of Decision 2004/512/EC and is not bound by it or subject to its application as it constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2000/365/ES z dne 29. maja 2000 o prošnji Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [2] Združeno kraljestvo ni sodelovalo pri sprejetju Odločbe 2004/512/ES, ki zato zanj ni zavezujoča, niti se v njem ne uporablja, saj pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
In accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [3], Ireland has not taken part in the adoption of Decision 2004/512/EC and is not bound by it or subject to its application as it constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis.
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2002/192/ES z dne 28. februarja 2002 o prošnji Irske za sodelovanje pri izvajanju nekaterih določb schengenskega pravnega reda [3] Irska ni sodelovala pri sprejetju Odločbe 2004/512/ES, ki zato zanjo ni zavezujoča, niti se v njej ne uporablja, saj pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda.
Ireland is therefore not an addressee of this Commission decision.
Zato ta odločba Komisije ni naslovljena na Irsko.
Decision 2004/512/EC is thus binding upon Denmark in international law.
Odločba 2004/512/ES je zato zanjo zavezujoča v mednarodnem pravu.
As regards Iceland and Norway, Decision 2004/512/EC constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [4], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1(b) of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5].
Kar zadeva Islandijo in Norveško, Odločba 2004/512/ES pomeni razvoj določb schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [4], kar sodi na področje iz točke B člena 1 Sklepa Sveta 1999/437/ES z dne 17. maja 1999 o nekaterih izvedbenih predpisih za uporabo sporazuma med Svetom Evropske unije in Republiko Islandijo ter Kraljevino Norveško o pridružitvi obeh k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda [5].
As regards Switzerland, Decision 2004/512/EC constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed by the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation, concerning the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in Article 4(1) of the Council Decision 2004/860/EC [6] on the signing, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of this Agreement.
Kar zadeva Švico, Odločba 2004/512/ES pomeni razvoj schengenskega pravnega reda v smislu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo, Evropsko skupnostjo in Švicarsko konfederacijo o pridružitvi Švicarske konfederacije k izvajanju, uporabi in razvoju schengenskega pravnega reda, kar sodi na področje iz člena 4(1) Sklepa Sveta 2004/860/ES [6] o podpisu in o začasni uporabi nekaterih določb tega sporazuma v imenu Evropske skupnosti.
This Decision constitutes an act building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the Act of Accession.
Ta uredba je akt, ki izhaja iz schengenskega pravnega reda ali je drugače povezan z njim v smislu člena 3(2) Akta o pristopu.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up pursuant to Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 of 6 December 2001 on the development of the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) [7],
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega s členom 5(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2424/2001 z dne 6. decembra 2001 o razvoju druge generacije Schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) [7] –
During the development of the system, the central unit of the VIS shall be located in Strasbourg (France).
Med razvojem sistema je sedež centralne enote VIS v Strasbourgu (Francija).
During the development of the system the back up central unit shall be located in Sankt Johann in Pongau (Austria).
Med razvojem sistema je sedež nadomestne centralne enote v kraju Sankt Johann in Pongau (Avstrija).
Done at Brussels, 3 November 2006.
V Bruslju, 3. novembra 2006
terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of recordable compact discs (CD+/-R) originating in the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong and Malaysia
o zaključku protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza kompaktnih diskov za snemanje (CD+/-R) s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, Hongkonga in Malezije
The initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of recordable compact discs (‘CD-R’) originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’), Hong Kong and Malaysia was announced on 6 August 2005 in the Official Journal of the European Union [2] (‘notice of initiation’).
Začetek protidampinškega postopka glede uvoza kompaktnih diskov („CD-ROM-ov“) za snemanje s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“), Hongkonga in Malezije je bil objavljen 6. avgusta 2005 v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2] („obvestilo o začetku postopka“).
The initiation was made following a complaint lodged on 24 June 2005 by the Committee of European CD-Rs and DVD+/-R manufacturers — ‘CECMA’ (‘the complainant’) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 60 %, of the total Community production of CD-R.
Začetek postopka je sledil pritožbi, ki jo je 24. junija 2005 v imenu proizvajalcev, ki sestavljajo glavni delež, v tem primeru več kot 60 % celotne proizvodnje CD-ROM-ov v Skupnosti, vložil Odbor evropskih proizvajalcev CD-ROM-ov in DVD+/-R-ov – CECMA („pritožnik“).
The complaint contained evidence of dumping of CD-Rs and of material injury resulting there from, which was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of the proceeding.
Pritožba je vsebovala dokaze o dampingu CD-ROM-ov in o znatni škodi, ki je zaradi tega nastala, kar je zadostovalo za začetek postopka.
The Commission officially advised the complainant, other Community producers, the exporting producers, importers, suppliers and users as well as user associations known to be concerned, and representatives of the PRC of the opening of the proceeding.
Komisija je pritožnika, druge proizvajalce Skupnosti, proizvajalce izvoznike, uvoznike, dobavitelje, uporabnike in združenja, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter predstavnike LRK uradno seznanila z začetkom postopka.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost, da v roku, ki je določen v obvestilu o začetku, pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
The complainant producers, other cooperating Community producers, exporting producers, importers, suppliers, users and user associations made their views known.
Proizvajalci pritožniki, drugi sodelujoči proizvajalci Skupnosti, proizvajalci izvozniki, uvozniki, dobavitelji, uporabniki in združenja so izrazili svoja stališča.
All interested parties, who so requested and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted a hearing.
Vsem zainteresiranim strankam, ki so vložile ustrezni zahtevek in dokazale, da obstajajo posebni razlogi, zaradi katerih bi morale biti zaslišane, je bilo to odobreno.
In order to allow exporting producers in the PRC to submit a claim for market economy treatment (‘MET’) or individual treatment (‘IT’), if they so wished, the Commission sent MET and IT claim forms to the Chinese companies known to be concerned.
Da bi proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK lahko predložili zahtevek za tržnogospodarsko obravnavo („TGO“) ali individualno obravnavo („IO“), če tako želijo, je Komisija kitajskim družbam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, poslala obrazce TGO in IO.
Thirteen groups of exporting producers (‘exporting producers’) requested MET pursuant to Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation or IT pursuant to Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation should the investigation establish that they did not meet the conditions for MET.
Trinajst skupin proizvajalcev izvoznikov („proizvajalci izvozniki“) je zahtevalo TGO v skladu s členom 2(7) ali IO v skladu s členom 9(5) osnovne uredbe, če bi preiskava pokazala, da ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za TGO.
In view of the apparent high number of exporting producers in the PRC and Hong Kong, sampling was envisaged in the notice of initiation for the determination of dumping, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na očitno veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Hongkongu, je bilo v obvestilu o začetku za ugotavljanje dampinga predvideno vzorčenje v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe.
In order to enable the Commission to decide whether sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers were asked to make themselves known to the Commission and to provide, as specified in the notice of initiation, basic information on their activities related to the product concerned during the investigation period (1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005).
Da bi se Komisija lahko odločila, ali je vzorčenje potrebno, in če bi bilo, izbrala vzorec, so bili vsi proizvajalci izvozniki zaprošeni, da se javijo Komisiji in predložijo, kot je določeno v obvestilu o začetku, osnovne informacije o svojih dejavnostih, povezanih z zadevnim izdelkom, v obdobju preiskave (1. julij 2004–30. junij 2005).
After examination of the information submitted and given the high number of exporting producers in the PRC and Hong Kong which indicated their willingness to cooperate, it was decided that sampling was required.
Po preiskavi predloženih informacij in glede na veliko število proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Hongkongu, ki so bili pripravljeni sodelovati, je bilo odločeno, da je vzorčenje potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned and to all other companies that made themselves known within the deadlines set out in the notice of initiation.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in vsem drugim družbam, ki so se javile v rokih, navedenih v obvestilu o začetku.
Replies were received from all complainant producers, one other Community producer, eight unrelated importers, one distributor and seven retailers (one of whom is a combined wholesaler/retailer), six exporting producers in the PRC, six exporting producers in Hong Kong, four exporting producers in Malaysia, two traders related to Chinese exporting producers and one trader related to a Malaysian exporting producer located in Taiwan, one trader related to Hong Kong exporting producers, 12 importers related to Chinese or Malaysian exporting producers and located in the Community.
Komisija je prejela odgovore od vseh proizvajalcev pritožnikov, enega drugega proizvajalca Skupnosti, osmih nepovezanih uvoznikov, enega distributerja in sedmih trgovcev na drobno (eden od teh je hkrati trgovec na debelo), šestih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK, šest proizvajalcev iz Hongkonga, štirih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Maleziji, dveh trgovcev, povezanih s kitajskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, in enega trgovca, povezanega z malezijskim proizvajalcem izvoznikom, s sedežem na Tajvanu, enega trgovca, povezanega s proizvajalci izvozniki iz Hongkonga, dvanajstih uvoznikov, povezanih s kitajskimi ali malezijskimi proizvajalci izvozniki, s sedežem v Skupnosti.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for a definitive determination of dumping, injury and Community interest and carried out verifications at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, potrebne za dokončno ugotovitev dampinga, posledične škode in interesa Skupnosti, ter izvedla preveritvene obiske v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Community producers:
proizvajalci Skupnosti:
(Milan, Italy)
(Milano, Italija)
Global Digital Disk GmbH & Co KG (Dresden, Germany)
Global Digital Disk GmbH & Co KG (Dresden, Nemčija)
Manufacturing Advanced Media S.A. (Mulhouse, France)
Manufacturing Advanced Media S.A. (Mulhouse, Francija)
Sony DADC AG (Salzburg, Austria)
Sony DADC AG (Salzburg, Avstrija)
TDK Recording Media Europe SA (Luxembourg)
TDK Recording Media Europe SA (Luksemburg)
exporting producers in the PRC:
proizvajalci izvozniki v LRK:
exporting producers in Hong Kong:
proizvajalci izvozniki v Hongkongu:
exporting producers in Malaysia:
proizvajalci izvozniki v Maleziji:
related traders:
povezani trgovci:
unrelated importers and distributors:
nepovezani uvozniki in distributerji:
related distributor:
povezani distributer:
SK Kassetten GmbH & Co KG (Neuenrade, Germany)
SK Kassetten GmbH & Co KG (Neuenrade, Nemčija)
wholesaler/Retailer:
trgovci na debelo/trgovci na drobno:
Metro Group Buying GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany)
Metro Group Buying GmbH (Düsseldorf, Nemčija)
retailers:
trgovci na drobno:
El Corte Inglés S.A.(Madrid, Spain)
El Corte Inglés S.A.(Madrid, Španija)
other stakeholders:
druge zainteresirane stranke:
Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, Eindhoven, Netherlands
Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, Eindhoven, Nizozemska
In light of the need to establish a normal value for exporting producers in the PRC to which MET might not be granted, a verification to establish normal value on the basis of data from an analogue country took place at the premises of the following producer in Japan:
Glede na potrebo po vzpostavitvi normalne vrednosti za proizvajalce izvoznike v LRK, katerim TGO mogoče ne bi bil odobren, je preveritveni obisk za vzpostavitev normalne vrednosti na podlagi podatkov primerljive države potekal v prostorih naslednje družbe:
Taiyo Yuden, Inc. (Takasaki, Japan)
Taiyo Yuden, Inc. (Takasaki, Japonska)
With regard to exporting producers in the PRC and Hong Kong, the Commission selected, in accordance with Article 17 of the basic Regulation, a sample based on the largest representative volume of exports to the Community which could reasonably be investigated within the time available.
Glede proizvajalcev izvoznikov v LRK in Hongkongu je Komisija v skladu s členom 17 osnovne uredbe izbrala vzorec, ki temelji na največjem reprezentativnem obsegu izvoza v Skupnost, ki ga je bilo mogoče v razpoložljivem času primerno preučen.
The sample selected for the Chinese exporting producers consisted of four Chinese exporting producers, representing around 85 % of the export volume of the cooperating parties from the PRC to the Community.
Izbrani vzorec za kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike zajema štiri kitajske proizvajalce izvoznike, ki predstavljajo približno 85 % obsega izvoza sodelujočih strank iz LRK v Skupnost.
Additionally, two exporters were included on the reserve list.
Poleg tega sta bila dva izvoznika vključena na rezervni seznam.
The sample selected for the Hong Kong exporting producers also consisted of four companies, representing over 90 % of the volume of exports to the Community from the cooperating exporting producers from Hong Kong.
Izbrani vzorci za proizvajalce izvoznike iz Hongkonga zajemajo štiri družbe, ki predstavljajo približno 90 % obsega izvoza sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Hongkonga v Skupnost.
Additionally, two companies were included on the reserve list.
Poleg tega sta bili dve družbi vključeni na rezervni seznam.
The Commission received replies from the sampled exporters in China and Hong Kong as well as from the companies on the reserve list.
Komisija je prejela izpolnjene vprašalnike od vzorčenih izvoznikov iz LRK in Hongkonga, kakor tudi družb na rezervnem seznamu.
In accordance with Article 17(2) of the basic Regulation the Chinese and Hong Kong authorities were consulted on the samples and raised no objections.
V skladu s členom 17(2) osnovne uredbe je bilo s kitajskimi in hongkonškimi organi opravljeno posvetovanje o vzorcih,vendar ti niso predložili pripomb.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 (‘investigation period’ or ‘IP’).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
It is recalled that given the need to further examine certain aspects of injury, causation and Community interest, no provisional measures were imposed in the current investigation.
Treba je opozoriti, da zaradi potrebe po nadaljnji proučitvi nekaterih vidikov škode, vzročne zveze in interesov Skupnosti, v sedanji preiskavi niso bili uvedeni nobeni začasni ukrepi.
All parties were informed of the preliminary findings and of the facts and considerations on which the decision not to impose provisional measures was based.
Vse stranke so prejele obvestilo o predhodnih ugotovitvah, dejstvih in premislekih, na katerih je temeljila odločitev o neuvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments.
Vsem strankam je bilo določeno obdobje, v katerem lahko izrazijo pripombe.
Those parties who requested were also granted an opportunity to be heard orally.
Tem strankam je bila na zahtevo dana tudi možnost za ustno zaslišanje.
Measures in force on imports of CD-Rs from other countries
Obstoječi ukrepi na uvoz CD-ROM-ov iz drugih držav
Definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of CD-Rs from Taiwan were imposed on 19 June 2002 [3].
Dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz CD-ROM-ov iz Tajvana so bile uvedene 19. junija 2002 [3].
They ranged from 17,7 % to 38,5 %.
Gibale so se med 17,7 % in 38,5 %.