natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission should carefully examine the need for Community action in the field of unfair competition beyond the remit of this Directive and, if necessary, make a legislative proposal to cover these other aspects of unfair competition.
Komisija bi morala natančno preučiti potrebo po ukrepih Skupnosti na področjih nelojalne konkurence, ki presegajo področje uporabe te direktive, in po potrebi predstaviti zakonodajni predlog, ki bi vključeval te druge vidike nelojalne konkurence.
This Directive is without prejudice to individual actions brought by those who have been harmed by an unfair commercial practice.
Ta direktiva ne posega v individualne tožbe posameznikov, oškodovanih zaradi nepoštene poslovne prakse.
It is also without prejudice to Community and national rules on contract law, on intellectual property rights, on the health and safety aspects of products, on conditions of establishment and authorisation regimes, including those rules which, in conformity with Community law, relate to gambling activities, and to Community competition rules and the national provisions implementing them.
Prav tako ne posega v pravila Skupnosti in nacionalna pravila o pogodbenem pravu, o pravicah intelektualne lastnine, o vidikih zdravja in varnosti izdelkov, o pogojih ustanavljanja in sistemih izdajanja dovoljenj, vključno s tistimi, ki se v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti nanašajo na igralništvo, in ne posega v pravila Skupnosti o konkurenci in nacionalne določbe za njihovo izvajanje.
The Member States will thus be able to retain or introduce restrictions and prohibitions of commercial practices on grounds of the protection of the health and safety of consumers in their territory wherever the trader is based, for example in relation to alcohol, tobacco or pharmaceuticals.
Države članice bodo tako lahko ohranile ali uvedle omejitve in prepovedi poslovnih praks zaradi varovanja zdravja in zagotavljanja varnosti potrošnikov na svojem ozemlju, ne glede na to, kje se trgovec nahaja, na primer v zvezi z alkoholom, tobakom ali farmacevtskimi izdelki.
Financial services and immovable property, by reason of their complexity and inherent serious risks, necessitate detailed requirements, including positive obligations on traders.
Finančne storitve in nepremičnine terjajo zaradi svoje zapletenosti in resnih tveganj, ki so z njimi neločljivo povezana, podrobne zahteve, vključno s pozitivnimi obveznostmi za trgovce.
For this reason, in the field of financial services and immovable property, this Directive is without prejudice to the right of Member States to go beyond its provisions to protect the economic interests of consumers.
Zato na področju finančnih storitev in nepremičnin ta direktiva ne posega v pravico držav članic, da z namenom zaščititi ekonomske interese potrošnikov presežejo določbe te direktive.
It is not appropriate to regulate here the certification and indication of the standard of fineness of articles of precious metal.
Ni primerno, da bi se s to direktivo urejala izdajanje potrdil in označevanje čistosti predmetov iz plemenitih kovin.
It is necessary to ensure that the relationship between this Directive and existing Community law is coherent, particularly where detailed provisions on unfair commercial practices apply to specific sectors.
Treba je zagotoviti, da sta ta direktiva in obstoječa zakonodaja Skupnosti usklajeni, zlasti če se v določenih sektorjih uporabljajo podrobne določbe o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah.
This Directive therefore amends Directive 84/450/EEC, Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts [4], Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests [5] and Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services [6].
Ta direktiva zato spreminja Direktivo 84/450/EGS, Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/7/ES z dne 20. maja 1997 o varstvu potrošnikov glede sklepanja pogodb pri prodaji na daljavo [4], Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 98/27/ES z dne 19. maja 1998 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov [5] in Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/65/ES z dne 23. septembra 2002 o trženju finančnih storitev potrošnikom na daljavo [6].
This Directive accordingly applies only in so far as there are no specific Community law provisions regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices, such as information requirements and rules on the way the information is presented to the consumer.
Zato se ta direktiva uporablja samo, kolikor ne obstajajo posebne določbe Skupnosti, ki urejajo posebne vidike nepoštenih poslovnih praks, na primer zahteve po informacijah in pravila o načinu predstavitve informacij potrošniku.
It provides protection for consumers where there is no specific sectoral legislation at Community level and prohibits traders from creating a false impression of the nature of products.
Zagotavlja varstvo potrošnikov, v kolikor ni na voljo posebne sektorske zakonodaje na ravni Skupnosti, in prepoveduje trgovcem, da ustvarijo lažen vtis o naravi izdelkov.
This is particularly important for complex products with high levels of risk to consumers, such as certain financial services products.
To je zlasti pomembno za zapletene izdelke, ki predstavljajo visoko raven tveganja za potrošnike, na primer nekatere finančne storitve.
This Directive consequently complements the Community acquis, which is applicable to commercial practices harming consumers' economic interests.
Ta direktiva posledično dopolnjuje pravni red Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za poslovne prakse, škodljive ekonomskim interesom potrošnikov.
The high level of convergence achieved by the approximation of national provisions through this Directive creates a high common level of consumer protection.
Z visoko stopnjo približanja, doseženo s približevanjem nacionalnih določb na podlagi te direktive, je vzpostavljena visoka skupna raven varstva potrošnikov.
This Directive establishes a single general prohibition of those unfair commercial practices distorting consumers' economic behaviour.
Ta direktiva določa enotno splošno prepoved tistih nepoštenih poslovnih praks, ki izkrivljajo ekonomsko obnašanje potrošnikov.
It also sets rules on aggressive commercial practices, which are currently not regulated at Community level.
Določa tudi pravila glede agresivnih poslovnih praks, ki trenutno niso urejene na ravni Skupnosti.
Harmonisation will considerably increase legal certainty for both consumers and business.
Z uskladitvijo se bo znatno povečala pravna varnost za potrošnike in podjetja.
Both consumers and business will be able to rely on a single regulatory framework based on clearly defined legal concepts regulating all aspects of unfair commercial practices across the EU.
Potrošniki in podjetja se bodo lahko zanesli na enotni ureditveni okvir, temelječ na jasno opredeljenih pravnih pojmih, ki bodo urejali vse vidike nepoštenih poslovnih praks po celotni EU.
The effect will be to eliminate the barriers stemming from the fragmentation of the rules on unfair commercial practices harming consumer economic interests and to enable the internal market to be achieved in this area.
Posledica bo odstranitev ovir, ki izvirajo iz razdrobljenosti pravil o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah, škodljivih za ekonomske interese potrošnikov, in omogočanje vzpostavitve notranjega trga na tem področju.
In order to achieve the Community's objectives through the removal of internal market barriers, it is necessary to replace Member States' existing, divergent general clauses and legal principles.
Za dosego ciljev Skupnosti z odstranitvijo ovir na notranjem trgu je treba nadomestiti obstoječe, med državami članicami razlikujoče se splošne klavzule in pravna načela.
The single, common general prohibition established by this Directive therefore covers unfair commercial practices distorting consumers' economic behaviour.
Enotna skupna splošna prepoved, kakor jo določa ta direktiva, zajema nepoštene poslovne prakse, ki izkrivljajo ekonomsko obnašanje potrošnikov.
In order to support consumer confidence the general prohibition should apply equally to unfair commercial practices which occur outside any contractual relationship between a trader and a consumer or following the conclusion of a contract and during its execution.
Da bi se zaupanje potrošnikov okrepilo, je treba splošno prepoved uporabljati tako za nepoštene poslovne prakse, ki se pojavljajo izven pogodbenih razmerij med trgovcem in potrošnikom, kakor tudi ob sklenitvi pogodbe in med njenim izpolnjevanjem.
The general prohibition is elaborated by rules on the two types of commercial practices which are by far the most common, namely misleading commercial practices and aggressive commercial practices.
Splošno prepoved sestavljajo pravila o dveh vrstah poslovnih praks, ki veljata za daleč najobičajnejši, to so zavajajoče poslovne prakse in agresivne poslovne prakse.
It is desirable that misleading commercial practices cover those practices, including misleading advertising, which by deceiving the consumer prevent him from making an informed and thus efficient choice.
Zaželeno je, da zavajajoče poslovne prakse zajemajo prakse, vključno zavajajoče oglaševanje, ki z zavajanjem potrošniku preprečijo, da izbere ob poznavanju vseh pomembnih dejstev in torej učinkovito.
In conformity with the laws and practices of Member States on misleading advertising, this Directive classifies misleading practices into misleading actions and misleading omissions.
Ta direktiva v skladu z zakoni in praksami držav članic o zavajajočem oglaševanju deli zavajajoče prakse na zavajajoča dejanja in zavajajoče opustitve.
In respect of omissions, this Directive sets out a limited number of key items of information which the consumer needs to make an informed transactional decision.
V zvezi z opustitvami predvideva ta direktiva omejeno število ključnih informacij, ki jih potrošnik potrebuje, da lahko sprejme odločitev o poslu ob poznavanju vseh pomembnih dejstev.
Such information will not have to be disclosed in all advertisements, but only where the trader makes an invitation to purchase, which is a concept clearly defined in this Directive.
Ni treba, da so takšne informacije podane v vseh oglasih, temveč samo v primeru, da trgovec vabi k nakupu; ta pojem je v tej direktivi jasno opredeljen.
The full harmonisation approach adopted in this Directive does not preclude the Member States from specifying in national law the main characteristics of particular products such as, for example, collectors' items or electrical goods, the omission of which would be material when an invitation to purchase is made.
Pristop popolne uskladitve, sprejet v tej direktivi, ne preprečuje državam članicam, da v nacionalni zakonodaji določijo glavne značilnosti posameznih izdelkov, na primer zbirateljskih predmetov ali električnih naprav, katerih opustitev bi bila bistvena v primeru vabila k nakupu.
It is not the intention of this Directive to reduce consumer choice by prohibiting the promotion of products which look similar to other products unless this similarity confuses consumers as to the commercial origin of the product and is therefore misleading.
Ni namen te direktive zmanjšati izbiro potrošnikov s prepovedjo promocije izdelkov, ki so podobni drugim izdelkom, razen če ta podobnost povzroča zmedenost pri potrošnikih v zvezi s tržnim poreklom izdelka in je torej zavajajoča.
This Directive should be without prejudice to existing Community law which expressly affords Member States the choice between several regulatory options for the protection of consumers in the field of commercial practices.
Ta direktiva ne sme posegati v obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti, ki državam članicam izrecno dopušča izbiro med več ureditvenimi možnostmi glede varstva potrošnikov na področju poslovnih praks.
In particular, this Directive should be without prejudice to Article 13(3) of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector [7].
Ta direktiva še zlasti ne sme posegati v člen 13(3) Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/58/ES z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij [7].
Where Community law sets out information requirements in relation to commercial communication, advertising and marketing that information is considered as material under this Directive.
Če zakonodaja Skupnosti določa zahteve po informacijah v zvezi s tržnimi komunikacijami, oglaševanjem in trženjem, se šteje, da so po tej direktivi te informacije bistvene.
Member States will be able to retain or add information requirements relating to contract law and having contract law consequences where this is allowed by the minimum clauses in the existing Community law instruments.
Države članice bodo lahko ohranile ali dodale zahteve po informacijah, ki se nanašajo na pogodbeno pravo in imajo posledice na področju pogodbenega prava, v kolikor to dovoljujejo minimalne klavzule v obstoječih pravnih instrumentih Skupnosti.
A non-exhaustive list of such information requirements in the acquis is contained in Annex II.
Neizčrpen seznam takšnih zahtev po informacijah, predvidenih v pravnem redu Skupnosti, je vsebovan v Prilogi II.
Given the full harmonisation introduced by this Directive only the information required in Community law is considered as material for the purpose of Article 7(5) thereof.
Glede na popolno uskladitev, predvideno s to direktivo, veljajo za bistvene v smislu člena 7(5) te direktive samo tiste informacije, ki jih zahteva zakonodaja Skupnosti.
Where Member States have introduced information requirements over and above what is specified in Community law, on the basis of minimum clauses, the omission of that extra information will not constitute a misleading omission under this Directive.
Če so države članice uvedle zahteve po informacijah, ki presegajo zahteve, določene v pravu Skupnosti z minimalnimi klavzulami, opustitev teh dodatnih informacij ne bo predstavljala zavajajoče opustitve po tej direktivi.
By contrast Member States will be able, when allowed by the minimum clauses in Community law, to maintain or introduce more stringent provisions in conformity with Community law so as to ensure a higher level of protection of consumers' individual contractual rights.
Nasprotno pa bodo države članice lahko ohranile ali uvedle strožje predpise v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, da bi zagotovile višjo raven varstva individualnih pogodbenih pravic potrošnikov, v kolikor bodo to dopuščale minimalne klavzule v pravu Skupnosti.
The provisions on aggressive commercial practices should cover those practices which significantly impair the consumer's freedom of choice.
Določbe o agresivnih poslovnih praksah morajo zajemati prakse, ki bistveno zmanjšujejo potrošnikovo svobodo izbire.
Those are practices using harassment, coercion, including the use of physical force, and undue influence.
To so prakse nadlegovanja, prisile, vključno z uporabo sile, in nedopustnega vplivanja.
It is desirable that those commercial practices which are in all circumstances unfair be identified to provide greater legal certainty.
Zaželeno je, da se za zagotovitev večje pravne varnosti opredelijo poslovne prakse, ki veljajo v vseh okoliščinah za nepoštene.
Annex I therefore contains the full list of all such practices.
Priloga I vsebuje torej izčrpen seznam vseh takšnih praks.
These are the only commercial practices which can be deemed to be unfair without a case-by-case assessment against the provisions of Articles 5 to 9.
To so edine poslovne prakse, ki lahko veljajo za nepoštene, ne da bi bila potrebna ocena posameznih primerov na podlagi določb iz členov 5 do 9.
The list may only be modified by revision of the Directive.
Seznam se lahko spremeni le s pregledom Direktive.
It is appropriate to protect all consumers from unfair commercial practices; however the Court of Justice has found it necessary in adjudicating on advertising cases since the enactment of Directive 84/450/EEC to examine the effect on a notional, typical consumer.
Pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami je primerno varovati vse potrošnike; vendar pa je Sodišče od sprejetja Direktive 84/450/EGS pri razsojanju o zadevah v zvezi z oglaševanjem menilo, da je potrebno oceniti vpliv na namišljenega tipičnega potrošnika.
In line with the principle of proportionality, and to permit the effective application of the protections contained in it, this Directive takes as a benchmark the average consumer, who is reasonably well-informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, taking into account social, cultural and linguistic factors, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, but also contains provisions aimed at preventing the exploitation of consumers whose characteristics make them particularly vulnerable to unfair commercial practices.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti in z namenom omogočiti dejansko uporabo v njej zajetih varovalnih ukrepov ta direktiva kot merilo postavlja povprečnega potrošnika, ki je razumno obveščen, pozoren in pazljiv in ob upoštevanju družbenih, kulturnih in jezikovnih dejavnikov, v skladu z razlago Sodišča, hkrati pa vsebuje določbe za preprečevanje izkoriščanja potrošnikov, ki imajo značilnosti, zaradi katerih so še posebej dovzetni za nepoštene komercialne prakse.
Where a commercial practice is specifically aimed at a particular group of consumers, such as children, it is desirable that the impact of the commercial practice be assessed from the perspective of the average member of that group.
Če je poslovna praksa posebej usmerjena na določeno skupino potrošnikov, na primer na otroke, je zaželeno, da se učinek poslovne prakse oceni z vidika povprečnega predstavnika navedene skupine.
It is therefore appropriate to include in the list of practices which are in all circumstances unfair a provision which, without imposing an outright ban on advertising directed at children, protects them from direct exhortations to purchase.
Zato je na seznam praks, ki so v vseh okoliščinah nepoštene, primerno vključiti določbo, ki ne uvaja dokončne prepovedi oglaševanja, usmerjenega na otroke, ampak otroke ščiti pred neposrednim spodbujanjem k nakupu.
The average consumer test is not a statistical test.
Test povprečnega potrošnika ni statističen test.
National courts and authorities will have to exercise their own faculty of judgement, having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice, to determine the typical reaction of the average consumer in a given case.
Nacionalna sodišča in organi se bodo morali pri opredelitvi tipične reakcije povprečnega potrošnika v danem primeru zanašati na lastno sposobnost za razsojanje, ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča.
Where certain characteristics such as age, physical or mental infirmity or credulity make consumers particularly susceptible to a commercial practice or to the underlying product and the economic behaviour only of such consumers is likely to be distorted by the practice in a way that the trader can reasonably foresee, it is appropriate to ensure that they are adequately protected by assessing the practice from the perspective of the average member of that group.
Če so potrošniki zaradi nekaterih značilnosti, na primer starosti, telesne ali duševne hibe ali lahkovernosti, še posebej dovzetni za določeno poslovno prakso ali za izdelek, na katerega se slednja nanaša, in če bi takšna praksa lahko povzročila izkrivljanje ekonomskega ravnanja samo teh potrošnikov na način, ki ga trgovec lahko razumno predvidi, je primerno, da se zagotovi ustrezno varstvo teh potrošnikov z oceno prakse z vidika povprečnega člana navedene skupine.
It is appropriate to provide a role for codes of conduct, which enable traders to apply the principles of this Directive effectively in specific economic fields.
Primerno je opredeliti vlogo kodeksov ravnanja, ki trgovcem omogočajo, da dejansko uporabljajo načela te direktive na posameznih gospodarskih področjih.
In sectors where there are specific mandatory requirements regulating the behaviour of traders, it is appropriate that these will also provide evidence as to the requirements of professional diligence in that sector.
V sektorjih, za katere veljajo posebne obvezne zahteve, ki urejajo ravnanje trgovcev, je primerno, da iz teh obveznih zahtev izhajajo tudi dokazi o izpolnjevanju zahtev poklicne skrbnosti za ta sektor.
The control exercised by code owners at national or Community level to eliminate unfair commercial practices may avoid the need for recourse to administrative or judicial action and should therefore be encouraged.
Nadzor, ki ga na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni Skupnosti izvajajo tvorci kodeksov z namenom odstraniti nepoštene poslovne prakse, lahko omogoči, da se ni treba zateči k upravnim ali sodnim postopkom in ga je zato treba spodbujati.
With the aim of pursuing a high level of consumer protection, consumers' organisations could be informed and involved in the drafting of codes of conduct.
S sestavo kodeksov ravnanja bi se lahko seznanilo organizacije potrošnikov in se jih pritegnilo k sodelovanju, z namenom doseči visoko raven varstva potrošnikov.
Persons or organisations regarded under national law as having a legitimate interest in the matter must have legal remedies for initiating proceedings against unfair commercial practices, either before a court or before an administrative authority which is competent to decide upon complaints or to initiate appropriate legal proceedings.
Osebe ali organizacije, ki imajo po nacionalni zakonodaji upravičen interes v zadevi, morajo imeti na voljo pravna sredstva za začetek postopka proti nepoštenim poslovnim praksam, bodisi pred sodiščem ali pri upravnem organu, ki je pristojen za odločanje o pritožbah ali za začetek ustreznega postopka.
While it is for national law to determine the burden of proof, it is appropriate to enable courts and administrative authorities to require traders to produce evidence as to the accuracy of factual claims they have made.
Medtem ko dokazno breme določa nacionalna zakonodaja, je primerno, da se sodiščem in upravnim organom omogoči, da od trgovcev zahtevajo predložitev dokazov o točnosti njihovih navedb.
It is necessary that Member States lay down penalties for infringements of the provisions of this Directive and they must ensure that these are enforced.
Države članice morajo določiti kazni za kršitve določb te direktive in zagotoviti, da se te kazni izvršujejo.
The penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Te kazni morajo biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely to eliminate the barriers to the functioning of the internal market represented by national laws on unfair commercial practices and to provide a high common level of consumer protection, by approximating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States on unfair commercial practices, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer odstranitve ovir za delovanje notranjega trga, ki jih predstavljajo nacionalne zakonodaje o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah, in zagotovitve visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov z uskladitvijo zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker jih torej lažje doseže Skupnost, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to eliminate the internal market barriers and achieve a high common level of consumer protection.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne prekoračuje okvirov, ki so potrebni za odstranitev ovir na notranjem trgu in doseganje visoke skupne ravni varstva potrošnikov.