natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some parties alleged that any negative trends in the Community industry’s market share and profitability were largely due to the Community industry’s exports outside the Community market.
Nekatere stranke so trdile, da so vsa negativna gibanja tržnih deležev industrije Skupnosti ter dobičkonosnost zlasti posledica izvoza industrije Skupnosti na trg zunaj nje.
According to them, if the Community industry’s exports had been sold in the EC market instead of being exported to the USA market, the Community industry would have been able to meet the demand on the EC market, to keep its market share and to sell at a better price.
Glede na njihove trditve bi lahko industrija Skupnosti zadostila povpraševanje na trgu ES, obdržala svoj tržni delež in prodajala po boljših cenah, če bi bil izvoz industrije Skupnosti prodan na trgu ES, namesto da se izvozi na trg ZDA.
The investigation showed that the exports of the Community industry continuously increased since 2000 and represented more than 50 % of its total sales of the product concerned during the IPs, compared to less than 45 % in the year 2000.
Preiskava je pokazala, da se je izvoz industrije Skupnosti od leta 2000 nenehno povečeval in znašal več kot 50 % njene celotne prodaje zadevnega izdelka med obdobji preiskave, v primerjavi z manj kot 45 % v letu 2000.
In this respect, it should first of all be noted that the Community industry’s market strategy is not to meet the demand on the Community market whatever the price is, but to sell a maximum on this market at an acceptable price.
V zvezi s tem je treba najprej opomniti, da tržna strategija industrije Skupnosti ni zadostiti povpraševanje na trgu Skupnosti ne glede na ceno, temveč na tem trgu prodati po kolikor je mogoče sprejemljivi ceni.
Secondly, the prices of exports to the USA do not as such point to injury because they are not comparable to those on the Community market.
Drugič, cene izvoza v ZDA kot take ne kažejo na škodo, saj niso primerljive s cenami na trgu Skupnosti.
Indeed, it was found that any link made between the exports sales and the situation of the Community industry is not relevant because the exports sales and the sales made on the Community market are not comparable in terms of product mix and thus in terms of price.
V resnici je bilo ugotovljeno, da kakršna koli povezava med izvozno prodajo in razmerami industrije Skupnosti ni pomembna, ker izvozna prodaja in prodaja na trgu Skupnosti nista primerljivi glede ponudbe in torej tudi ne glede cene.
Sales made on the export market are mainly sales of granules in big bags whose price is much lower than the product sold on the Community market, i.e. mainly tablets.
Prodaja na izvoznem trgu je v glavnem prodaja granul v velikih vrečah, cena katerih je veliko nižja od izdelkov, prodanih na trgu Skupnosti, to so pretežno tablete.
A simple price comparison of the unadjusted figures is therefore inconclusive.
Preprosta primerjava cen neprilagojenih številk zato ne pove veliko.
Thirdly, it should be noted that more than 80 % of the sales on the Community market take place between February and August, while the sales period on the American market is longer, particularly in the sunbelt area.
Tretjič je treba opomniti, da se je več kakor 80 % prodaje na trgu Skupnosti odvijalo med februarjem in avgustom, medtem ko je prodajno obdobje na ameriškem trgu daljše, zlasti v toplejših območjih.
Therefore, the sales to the USA in excess of what the Community market could absorb at an acceptable price allowed the Community industry to achieve improved economies of scale and to maintain the price level on the Community market.
Zato je prodaja na trg ZDA, ki presega količine, ki bi jih trg Skupnosti lahko absorbiral po sprejemljivi ceni, omogočila industriji Skupnosti, da doseže izboljšano ekonomijo obsega in ohrani raven cen na trgu Skupnosti.
Fourthly, it should be noted that the USA market is the first market in the world for swimming pool equipment and chemicals.
Četrtič, treba je opomniti, da je ameriški trg vodilni trg opreme za bazene in kemikalije na svetu.
It was therefore vital for the Community industry to have access to this important market and maintain its position there, in order to diversify its customers and also to take part in the development of the most active market.
Zato je bilo za industrijo Skupnosti ključnega pomena, da ima dostop do tega pomembnega trga in da na njem ohrani svoj položaj in s tem razširi obseg strank ter sodeluje pri razvoju najbolj dejavnega trga.
Finally, no evidence was provided showing that these sales on the American market could have been replaced by sales on the Community market at the same period of time and at better price, thus causing self inflicted injury.
Nazadnje, predloženih ni bilo nobenih dokazov, ki bi pokazali, da bi lahko bila ta prodaja na ameriškem trgu nadomeščena s prodajo na trgu Skupnosti v istem časovnem obdobju in po ugodnejši ceni, torej da bi sama sebi povzročila škodo.
On the basis of the above, the claims were rejected and in the absence of any further comments, the conclusions drawn in respect of the effect of other factors in recitals 142 to 154 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno so bili zahtevki zavrnjeni, in ker ni bilo predloženih drugih pripomb, se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve glede vpliva drugih dejavnikov iz uvodnih izjav (142) do (154) začasne uredbe.
CONCLUSION ON CAUSATION
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV O VZROČNI ZVEZI
Based on the above considerations and other elements contained in recitals 136 to 154 of the provisional Regulation, it is concluded that imports from the PRC and the USA have caused material injury to the Community industry within the meaning of Article 3(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi zgornjih premislekov in drugih elementov iz uvodnih izjav (136) do (154) začasne uredbe se sklene, da je uvoz iz LRK in ZDA povzročil znatno škodo industriji Skupnosti v smislu člena 3(6) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments made with respect to the interest of the Community industry, the findings as set out in recital 160 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih pripomb v zvezi z interesom industrije Skupnosti, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave (160) začasne uredbe.
INTEREST OF UNRELATED IMPORTERS
INTERES NEPOVEZANIH UVOZNIKOV
It should be recalled that the cooperation of unrelated importers was very low as already mentioned in recital 162 of the provisional Regulation.
Treba je opozoriti, da je bilo sodelovanje nepovezanih uvoznikov zelo slabo, kot je že omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (162) začasne uredbe.
Furthermore, no importers made any comments after disclosure of the provisional findings.
Poleg tega noben uvoznik po razkritju začasnih ugotovitev ni podal nobenih pripomb.
Under these circumstances, and in the absence of any further information submitted or available in respect of the interest of the unrelated importers, the findings as set out in recitals 161 and 162 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
V teh okoliščinah, in ker ni bilo predloženih ali na voljo nobenih dodatnih podatkov v zvezi z interesom nepovezanih uvoznikov, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (161) do (162) začasne uredbe.
INTEREST OF PROCESSORS
INTERES PREDELOVALCEV
The further investigation showed that the situation of the processors can vary a lot in terms of profitability and in terms of impact of TCCA on their cost of production.
Nadaljnja preiskava je pokazala, da se lahko stanje predelovalcev zelo spreminja v smislu dobičkonosnosti ter vpliva TCCA-ja na stroške proizvodnje.
Therefore, the assumption made in recital 168 of the provisional Regulation that TCCA represents more than 40 % of the processor’s cost of production and that it is a low margin product needs to be refined.
Zato je treba predpostavke iz uvodne izjave (168) začasne uredbe, da predstavlja TCCA več kakor 40 % stroškov proizvodnje predelovalcev in da gre za izdelek z nizkim ciljnim dobičkom, natančneje izpeljati.
Indeed, an additional on-the-spot verification carried out at the premises of one of the most important processor on the EC market, showed that the product concerned represented less than 25 % of its total cost of production and that its profitability was above 8 %.
V resnici je dodatni preveritveni obisk na kraju samem, ki je bil opravljen v prostorih enega najpomembnejših predelovalcev na trgu ES, pokazal, da je zadevni izdelek predstavljal manj kakor 25 % njegovih skupnih stroškov proizvodnje in da je znašala njegova dobičkonosnost več kakor 8 %.
One processor challenged the assessment of the provisional Regulation that the processors could revise their price upward, and thus pass part of the cost increase to their customers so that the effect of the measures would be diluted through the distribution chain.
En predelovalec je izpodbijal oceno začasne uredbe, da bi lahko predelovalci svoje cene popravili navzgor in tako prenesli del povečanja stroškov na svoje kupce, tako da bi bil učinek ukrepov porazdeljen po vsej distribucijski verigi.
This scenario was however confirmed by at least another processor, which clearly stated that since the provisional duties have been imposed, processors have increased their prices between 15 and 25 % (or on average EUR 0,32/kg) for the 2005 season.
Predvideni potek je vendarle potrdil vsaj še en predelovalec, ki je jasno navedel, da so od uvedbe začasnih dajatev predelovalci svoje cene povišali za 15 % do 25 % (ali povprečno 0,32 EUR/kg) za sezono 2005.
This was also confirmed by another processor.
To je potrdil tudi drugi predelovalec.
The investigation also showed that the processors are not contractually prevented from increasing their prices and that special clauses have also been inserted in their contracts for the 2006 season in view of the possible imposition of anti-dumping duties.
Preiskava je prav tako pokazala, da predelovalcem po pogodbi ni prepovedano zvišati svojih cen in da so bile v njihove pogodbe dodane posebne klavzule za sezono 2006 glede na morebitno uvedbo protidampinških dajatev.
These elements clearly show that the processors have already, at least partially, taken some precautions to pass on the cost increase to the distribution chain.
Ti elementi jasno kažejo, da so predelovalci vsaj delno že sprejeli varnostne ukrepe, da bi povišanje cen prenesli na distribucijsko verigo.
Finally, the investigation showed that the mark-up added by the mass merchants on their purchase price from the processors can be significant, i.e. above 40 %, which confirms that there is room for passing on the cost increase caused by the duties to the distribution chain.
Preiskava je tudi pokazala, da je lahko pribitek, ki ga veletrgovci dodajo nabavni ceni predelovalcev, znaten, tj. nad 40 %, kar potrjuje, da je dovolj možnosti za prenos zvišanja cen, ki je posledica dajatev za distribucijsko verigo.
One processor claimed that the imposition of one single duty on imports of TCCA in the form of both granules and tablets would drive exporting producers and intermediaries to import tablets directly and would negatively affect the processing activity.
En predelovalec je trdil, da bi uvedba ene same dajatve na uvoz TCCA tako v obliki granul kot tablet proizvajalce izvoznike in posrednike pripeljala do tega, da bi neposredno uvažali tablete in bi tako negativno vplivali na dejavnosti predelave.
It was therefore suggested that a higher duty be imposed on imports of tablets than on imports of TCCA in granules.
Zato je bil podan predlog, da se uvede višja dajatev na uvoz tablet kakor na uvoz TCCA v obliki granul.
According to this processor, such distinction would allow to protect both the Community industry and the processors.
Po mnenju tega predelovalca bi tako razlikovanje omogočilo zaščito tako industrije Skupnosti kot predelovalcev.
However, it is recalled that the product concerned was defined as TCCA and preparations thereof.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da je bil zadevni izdelek opredeljen kot TCCA in njeni pripravki.
It can be in the form of granules, powder or tablets, with no limit of chlorine content.
Izdelek je lahko v obliki granul, prahu ali tablet, brez omejitve vsebnosti klora.
Therefore, although the comparisons were made between products having identical characteristics, such as the form or the packaging, the resulting duty applied on the product concerned should apply on imports of TCCA, whatever the form, i.e. granules, powder or tablets.
Zato se mora kljub primerjavi med izdelki z istimi lastnostmi, kot je npr. oblika pakiranja, iz tega izhajajoča dajatev, ki se je uporabila za zadevni izdelek, uporabiti za uvoz TCCA, ne glede na obliko, torej granule, prah ali tablete.
Any other approach would consist in using the anti-dumping duties to make up for the difference in processing costs between the European processors and the Chinese exporters, which is obviously not the purpose of anti-dumping measures.
Kakršen koli drugi pristop bi pripeljal do tega, da bi se protidampinške dajatve uporabile za izravnavo razlik v stroških predelave med evropskimi predelovalci in kitajskimi izvozniki, kar pa seveda ni namen protidampinških ukrepov.
Finally, it is noted that, although the same ad valorem duty applies to both TCCA in granules and tablets of TCCA, it will necessarily result in a higher amount of duties to be paid when applied on more expensive products, such as tablets.
Nazadnje je treba opomniti, da bodo čeprav se ista dajatev ad valorem uporablja tako za TCCA v obliki granul kot tablet, nujna posledica višji davki, ki jih bo treba plačati za dražje izdelke, kot so tablete.
This could partially satisfy the request made by this processor.
To bi lahko delno zadovoljilo zahtevo, ki jo je predložil predelovalec.
On the basis of the above, and in the absence of any other comments made with respect to the interest of the Community processors, the findings as set out in recitals 163 to 172 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ker ni bilo predloženih drugih pripomb v zvezi z interesom predelovalcev Skupnosti, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (163) do (172) začasne uredbe.
INTEREST OF CONSUMERS
INTERES POTROŠNIKOV
One processor reiterated its claim that any price increase will not be in the consumers’ interest.
En predelovalec je ponovno predložil svoj zahtevek, da vsako povišanje cen ne bo v interesu potrošnikov.
However, as explained in the provisional Regulation, any price increase is likely to be minor and thus not to affect the consumer’s choice.
Vendar bo, kot je pojasnjeno v začasni uredbi, vsako povišanje cen verjetno majhno in tako ne bo vplivalo na izbiro, ki jo ima potrošnik.
This has been confirmed by one processor who even stated that the impact on the final consumer would be around EUR 10 per year, which is even less then the conservative estimate of EUR 2,5 per month mentioned in the provisional Regulation.
To je potrdil en predelovalec, ki je celo navedel, da bi bil vpliv na končnega potrošnika okoli 10 EUR na leto, kar je celo manj od previdne ocene 2,5 EUR mesečno, kakor je omenjeno v začasni uredbi.
Such a cost increase cannot be considered as significant or of a nature as to lead the final consumer to switch to alternative products.
Tako povišanje cen se ne more šteti za znatno ali take narave, da bi končni potrošnik izbral drugi izdelek.
In addition, the estimated amount of EUR 10 per year only reflects the hypothetical maximum impact of the measures if the entire duty were to be passed on to the final consumer.
Poleg tega ocenjen znesek 10 EUR na leto odraža le hipotetično največji možni vpliv ukrepov, če naj bi se celotna dajatev prenesla na končnega potrošnika.
It also does not take into account the fact that the definitive measures are at least for the imports originating in the USA lower than those provisionally imposed.
Prav tako ne upošteva dejstva, da so dokončni ukrepi vsaj za uvoz s poreklom iz ZDA nižji od začasno uvedenih.
On the basis of the above, and in the absence of any other comments made with respect to the interest of the Community consumers, the findings as set out in recitals 173 to 177 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega in ker ni bilo predloženih drugih pripomb v zvezi z interesom potrošnikov Skupnosti, se potrdijo ugotovitve iz uvodnih izjav (173) do (177) začasne uredbe.
CONCLUSION ON COMMUNITY INTEREST
SKLEPNA UGOTOVITEV O INTERESU SKUPNOSTI
In view of the conclusions drawn in the provisional Regulation, and taking into account the submissions made by the various parties, it is concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose definitive anti-dumping measures against dumped imports of TCCA originating in the countries concerned.
Glede na sklepne ugotovitve začasne uredbe in ob upoštevanju ugotovitev različnih strank se sklene, da ni utemeljenih razlogov proti uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov na dampinški uvoz TCCA s poreklom iz zadevnih držav.
Based on the methodology explained in recitals 179 to 183 of the provisional Regulation, an injury elimination level was calculated for the purposes of establishing the level of measures to be imposed.
Na podlagi metodologije, pojasnjene v uvodnih izjavah (179) do (183) začasne uredbe, je bila izračunana stopnja odprave škode za ugotavljanje stopnje ukrepov, ki naj se uvedejo.
When calculating the injury margin in the provisional Regulation, the target profit for the Community industry was set at 10 %, a level deemed conservative and which could be reasonably expected in the absence of injurious dumping.
Pri izračunu stopnje škode v začasni uredbi je bil ciljni dobiček za industrijo Skupnosti določen na 10 %, stopnja, ki se je zdela zmerna in razumno pričakovana brez škodljivega dampinga.
Several interested parties argued that a 10 % profit is inappropriate for the TCCA business and that the profit should rather be below 5 %.
Številne zainteresirane stranke so trdile, da je 10 % dobiček neprimeren za dejavnost TCCA in da bi moral biti dobiček pod 5 %.
However, as mentioned in recital 181 of the provisional Regulation, the profit level of the Community industry before the imports concerned into the Community started to significantly increase.
Vendar, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (181) začasne uredbe, ta ustreza stopnji dobička industrije Skupnosti pred znatnim povečanjem zadevnega uvoza v Skupnost.
Indeed, the level reached in 2000 and 2001, shows that a 10 % profit can reasonably be expected in the absence of dumping.
V resnici stopnja, dosežena leta 2000 in 2001, kaže, da se lahko 10 % dobiček, brez dampinga, razumno pričakuje.
In the absence of any new comments on this subject, the methodology set out in recitals 179 to 183 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Ker ni bilo nobenih novih pripomb glede tega vprašanja, se potrdi metodologija, določena v uvodnih izjavah (179) do (183) začasne uredbe.
In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin calculated as regards imports originating in the PRC and at the level of the injury margin calculated as regards imports originating in the USA.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in v skladu s členom 9(4) osnovne uredbe je treba uvesti dokončno protidampinško dajatev na stopnji izračunane dampinške stopnje pri uvozu s poreklom iz LRK in na stopnji izračunane stopnje dampinga pri uvozu s poreklom iz ZDA.
On the basis of the above, since the injury margins were in all cases higher than the dumping margins with regard to the PRC and lower than the dumping margins with regard to the USA, the definitive duties should be as follows:
Na podlagi zgoraj omenjenega, in ker so bile stopnje škode v vseh primerih višje od stopenj dampinga za LRK in nižje od stopenj dampinga za ZDA, morajo biti dokončne dajatve naslednje:
The individual anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Individualne stopnje protidampinške dajatve, določene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev te preiskave.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to these companies.
Zato odražajo stanje, v kakršnem sta bili med preiskavo ti dve družbi.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies specifically mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatve (za razliko od dajatve, ki velja za celo državo, in se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“) se torej uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki so jih proizvedle izrecno navedene družbe.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned by its name and address in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih je proizvedla katera koli druga družba, ki v izvedbenem delu te uredbe ni poimensko navedena, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s posebej navedenimi subjekti, ne morejo biti upravičeni do teh stopenj in zanje velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vse druge družbe“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [3] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company’s activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vsak zahtevek za uporabo teh individualnih stopenj protidampinške dajatve (npr. zaradi spremembe imena družbe ali zaradi ustanovitve novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih obratov) je treba takoj vložiti pri Komisiji [3], skupaj z vsemi potrebnimi podatki, zlasti o vsaki spremembi dejavnosti družbe na področju proizvodnje ter domače in izvozne prodaje, povezanimi s to spremembo imena ali spremembo proizvodnih in prodajnih obratov.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Če bo primerno, se bo ta uredba ustrezno spremenila s posodobljenim seznamom družb, ki so upravičene do individualnih stopenj dajatev.
In order to minimise the risks of circumvention due to the high difference in the amounts of duties, it is considered that special measures are needed in this case to ensure the proper application of the anti-dumping duties.
Za zmanjšanje tveganja izogibanja družbe zaradi prevelikih razlik v znesku dajatev se šteje, da so v tem primeru potrebni posebni ukrepi, da se zagotovi ustrezna uporaba protidampinških dajatev.
These special measures include:
Ti posebni ukrepi vključujejo:
The presentation to the customs authorities of the Member States of a valid commercial invoice, which shall conform to the requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.
Predložitev veljavne trgovske fakture carinskim organom držav članic, ki je skladna z zahtevami, navedenimi v Prilogi k tej uredbi.
Only imports accompanied by such an invoice shall be declared under the applicable TARIC additional codes of the producer in question.
Le uvoz, ki ga spremlja taka faktura, se prijavi pod dodatno oznako TARIC zadevnega proizvajalca.
Imports not accompanied by such an invoice shall be made subject to the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to all other exporters.
Uvoz, ki ga taka faktura ne spremlja, je predmet preostale protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za ves drugi uvoz.
The companies concerned have also been invited to submit regular reports to the Commission in order to ensure a proper follow-up of their sales of the product concerned to the Community.
Zadevne družbe so bile pozvane, da Komisiji predložijo redna poročila, da se zagotovi primerno nadaljevanje spremljanja cen zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti.