natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The dumping found on these markets would have been inappropriately disguised by the use of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of export prices to all Member States of the European Union, as the prices at dumped levels found for all three exporting producers on the UK and French markets were wholly or partly offset by higher and largely non-dumped prices on other Community markets.
Damping, ki je bil ugotovljen na teh trgih, je bil neustrezno zakrit z uporabo primerjave med tehtano povprečno normalno vrednostjo in tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v vse države članice Evropske unije, saj so bile cene po dampinški stopnji, ugotovljene za vse tri proizvajalce izvoznike na trgu Združenega kraljestva in trgu Francije, delno ali v celoti nadomeščene z višjimi in pretežno nedampinškimi cenami na drugih trgih Skupnosti.
Such methodology would not, therefore, reflect the full degree of dumping being practised.
Takšna metodologija zato ne bi v celoti odražala dejanske stopnje izvajanega dampinga.
It was accordingly found appropriate to reflect in the calculation of the dumping the significant differences in the pattern of export prices among different regions.
V skladu s tem se je zdelo ustrezno, da izračun dampinga upošteva znatne razlike v vzorcu izvoznih cen med različnimi regijami.
In this case, the transaction-to-transaction comparison was not found to be an appropriate alternative comparison method because the process of selecting individual transactions in order to make such a comparison was considered too impractical and arbitrary, with tens of thousands of export and domestic transactions.
V tem primeru primerjava na podlagi posameznih transakcij ni bila ustrezna alternativna primerjalna metoda, saj se je postopek izbire posameznih transakcij, potrebnih za zagotovitev take primerjave, zaradi več deset tisoč izvoznih in domačih transakcij zdel nepraktičen in arbitražen.
Consequently, according to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, for each co-operating exporting producer, the weighted average normal value was compared to the prices of all individual export transactions to the Community.
Posledično se je bila v skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost s ceno vseh posameznih izvoznih transakcij v Skupnost.
On this basis, the provisional dumping margins expressed as a percentage of the cif Community frontier price, duty unpaid, are:
Na tej podlagi so začasne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek cene CIF meja Skupnosti brez plačane dajatve, naslednje:
Since the level of cooperation was high (100 % of the exports of the product concerned from Korea to the Community), the residual provisional dumping margin was set at the level of the highest dumping margin established for a cooperating company, i.e. at the level established for LG Electronics Corporation, namely 14,3 %.
Ker je bila stopnja sodelovanja visoka (100 % izvoza zadevnega proizvoda iz Koreje v Skupnost), je bila preostala začasna stopnja dampinga postavljena na najvišjo določeno stopnjo dampinga za sodelujočo družbi, to je na stopnjo, določeno za LG Electronics Corporation, ki je 14,3 %.
Within the Community, the like product is only manufactured by the complainant.
V Skupnosti samo pritožnik proizvaja podoben izdelek.
The complainant properly co-operated in the investigation.
Pritožnik je v celoti sodeloval pri preiskavi.
Given that the complainant is the sole producer of the like product in the Community, its production represented, during the IP, 100 % of the Community production of the like product.
Glede na to, da je pritožnik edini proizvajalec podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti, je njegova proizvodnja med OP predstavljala 100 % proizvodnje podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
The complainant therefore constitutes both the Community production within the meaning of Article 4(1) of the basic Regulation and the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation.
Pritožnik zato predstavlja proizvodnjo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) osnovne uredbe in industrijo Skupnosti v smislu členov 4(1) in 5(4) osnovne uredbe.
The complainant will also be referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Pritožnik bo v nadaljnjem besedilu naveden kot „industrija Skupnosti“.
During the start-up phase (2002), the Community industry had to resort to imports of the like product procured from its mother company in the USA.
V začetni fazi (2002) se je industrija Skupnosti morala zateči k uvozu podobnega izdelka, ki ga je nabavila pri svoji matični družbi v ZDA.
The volumes procured from this source declined sharply from 2003 onwards as the production of the newly built plant gathered pace (see recitals (80) and (81) below).
Obseg, nabavljen iz tega vira, je strmo upadel po letu 2003, ko je začela rasti proizvodnja v novo zgrajeni tovarni (glej uvodni izjavi (80) in (81) spodaj).
As for the assessment of the situation of the Community industry (see from recital (48) below), the analysis concerns only the Community industry’s own production and not its purchases from its mother company.
Glede ocene položaja industrije Skupnosti (glej uvodno izjavo (48) spodaj) analiza zadeva zgolj lastno proizvodnjo industrije Skupnosti in ne njenih nakupov pri matični družbi.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the sales volumes of the Community industry’s own production on the Community market, the import volumes data obtained from the three Korean co-operating exporting producers on the Community market, and the import volumes on the Community market from the USA, as obtained from the most widely used database in this particular business.
Poraba Skupnosti je bila določena na podlagi obsega prodaje lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, podatkov o obsegu uvoza na trg Skupnosti, pridobljenih od treh sodelujočih korejskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ter na podlagi obsega uvoza iz ZDA na trg Skupnosti, pridobljenega iz najbolj uporabljane zbirke podatkov v zvezi s tem posebnim poslovanjem.
The like product was not imported into the Community from any other country in the world during the period considered.
Podobni izdelek v obravnavanem obdobju ni bil uvožen v Skupnost iz nobene druge države na svetu.
Given that the Community industry comprises only one producer, and given that the Community market for the product concerned and the like product is supplied by only three origins (the Community industry, the Korean producers and the USA), data relating to the market shares of the Community industry and of the USA are presented in an indexed format in order to preserve the confidentiality of the data submitted in confidence by the Community industry, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da industrijo Skupnosti sestavlja samo en proizvajalec in da ima trg Skupnosti za zadevni ter podobni izdelek samo tri vire dobave (industrija Skupnosti, korejski proizvajalci in ZDA), so podatki v zvezi s tržnim deležem industrije Skupnosti in ZDA izraženi z indeksom, da se ohrani zaupnost podatkov, ki jih je industrija Skupnosti kot zaupne tudi predložila, v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
Between 2002 and the IP, the Community market for the product concerned and the like product has grown more than twofold.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je trg Skupnosti za zadevni in podobni izdelek povečal za več kot dvakrat.
Community consumption was around 213000 pieces in 2002, and around 456000 in the IP.
Poraba v Skupnosti je leta 2002 znašala približno 213000 kosov in približno 456000 kosov med OP.
Specifically, it increased by 51 % in 2003, rose further by 54 percentage points in 2004, and by 10 percentage points in the IP.
Izrecno se je povečala leta 2003 za 51 % in nato še za 54 odstotnih točk v letu 2004 in 10 odstotnih točk v OP.
Total EC consumption (pieces)
Skupna poraba ES (kosov)
The volume of imports of the product concerned from the Republic of Korea into the Community rose massively and steadily between 2002 and the IP.
Obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Republike Koreje v Skupnost je med letom 2002 in OP močno in nenehno naraščal.
It rose by 157 % between 2002 and the IP.
Med letom 2002 in OP je narasel za 157 %.
In detail, imports from the country concerned increased by 66 % between 2002 and 2003, by a further 77 percentage points in 2004 and by a further 14 percentage points in the IP.
Podrobneje, uvoz iz zadevne države je narasel za 66 % med leti 2002 in 2003 ter za nadaljnjih 77 odstotnih točk v letu 2004 in še za nadaljnjih 14 odstotnih točk v OP.
Volume of imports from the Republic of Korea (pieces)
Obseg uvoza iz Republike Koreje (kosov)
Prices of imports from the Republic of Korea (EUR/piece)
Cene uvoza iz Republike Koreje (EUR/kos)
The market share held by exporters in the country concerned increased by around 13 percentage points during the period considered to reach a level of almost 80 % during the IP.
Tržni delež izvoznikov v zadevni državi se je povečal za približno 13 odstotnih točk v obravnavanem obdobju in v OP dosegel skoraj 80 % stopnje.
Korean exporters gained almost 7 percentage points in 2003, and again almost 6 percentage points in 2004.
Korejski izvozniki so pridobili skoraj 7 odstotnih točk leta 2003 in še nadaljnjih skoraj 6 odstotnih točk leta 2004.
The Community market is therefore characterised by an overwhelming dominance of the Korean producers.
Za trg Skupnost je torej značilna velika prevlada korejskih proizvajalcev.
Between 2002 and the IP, the average price of imports of the product concerned originating in the Republic of Korea declined by 11 %, although there has been a constant improvement in the functionalities of the models offered for sale, year after year.
Med letom 2002 in OP se je povprečna uvozna cena zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Republike Koreje znižala za 11 % kljub nenehnim vsakoletnim izboljšavam funkcij prodajanih modelov.
Specifically, the drop in the price was concentrated in 2003 over 2002.
Padec je bil izreden leta 2003 glede na leto 2002.
After 2003, average prices have remained flat (see table above).
Po letu 2003 je povprečna cena ostala stabilna (glej zgornjo preglednico).
A comparison for comparable models of the product concerned and like product was made between the exporting producers’ and the Community industry's average selling prices in the Community.
Za primerljive modele zadevnega in podobnega izdelka je bila med proizvajalci izvozniki in industrijo Skupnosti narejena primerjava povprečnih prodajnih cen izdelka v Skupnosti.
To this end, Community industry’s ex-works prices to unrelated customers, net of all rebates and taxes have been compared with the cif Community frontier prices of exporting producers of the Republic of Korea, duly adjusted for unloading and customs clearance costs.
V ta namen so bile cene franko tovarna industrije Skupnosti za nepovezane stranke brez vseh rabatov in davkov primerjane s cenami CIF meja Skupnosti proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz Republike Koreje, ustrezno prilagojenimi za stroške razkladanja in carinjenja.
The comparison showed that during the IP the product concerned originating in the Republic of Korea sold in the Community undercut the Community industry's prices by between 34 % and 42 %, depending on the exporter concerned.
Primerjava je pokazala, da je med OP zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, prodajan v Skupnosti, nelojalno nižal industrijske cene Skupnosti za 34 % do 42 %, odvisno od zadevnega izvoznika.
Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija proučila vse pomembne gospodarske dejavnike in kazalnike, ki zadevajo industrijo Skupnosti.
Given that the Community industry comprises only one producer, data relating to the Community industry are presented in an indexed format and/or in ranges in order to preserve confidentiality, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da industrijo Skupnosti sestavlja samo en proizvajalec, so podatki za industrijo Skupnosti izraženi v obliki indeksa in/ali v razponu, da se ohrani zaupnost, v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
It must also be noted that the Community industry started its operation in April 2002, which explains that the injury trends described hereafter generally show sharp movements between 2002 and 2003, which may be upwards (like for the volume of production) or downwards (like for investments).
Treba je opozoriti, da je industrija Skupnosti začela obratovati aprila 2002, kar razjasni, zakaj v nadaljevanju opisani trendi škode na splošno kažejo močna nihanja med leti 2002 in 2003, in sicer navzgor (npr. obseg proizvodnje) ali navzdol (npr. vlaganja).
The Community industry’s production increased by 205 % in 2003, increased further by 136 percentage points in 2004, when it reached a peak, and declined by 36 percentage points in the IP.
Proizvodnja industrije Skupnosti se je leta 2003 povečala za 205 % in nato še za 136 odstotnih točk leta 2004, ko je dosegla vrh, ter se nato zmanjšala za 36 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s production volume ranged between 70000 pieces and 100000 pieces.
Med OP je obseg proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti znašal med 70000 in 100000 kosi.
Production (pieces)
Proizvodnja (kosov)
cannot be disclosed
Razkritje ni mogoče
The production capacity first increased by 125 % in 2003, increased further by 113 percentage points in 2004 and stayed at this level in the IP.
Zmogljivost proizvodnje se je leta 2003 najprej povečala za 125 % in nato leta 2004 še za 113 odstotnih točk ter je v OP ostala na tej ravni.
During the IP, the Community industry’s production capacity ranged between 100000 pieces and 150000 pieces.
Med OP je zmogljivost proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti znašala med 100000 in 150000 kosi.
Production capacity (pieces)
Proizvodna zmogljivost (kosov)
Capacity utilisation rose by 36 % in 2003, when it reached its peak.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti se je leta 2003, ko je dosegla svoj vrh, povečala za 36 %.
In 2004, it declined by 5 percentage points, and dropped further by 11 percentage points in the IP.
Leta 2004 se je zmanjšala za 5 odstotnih točk in nato še za naslednjih 11 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s capacity utilisation ranged between 60 % and 90 %.
Med OP je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti znašala med 60 % in 90 %.
During the IP, inventories of finished products represented around 30 % of the Community industry’s total production volume, a level that is considered high and excessive.
Med OP je zaloga končnih izdelkov predstavljala okrog 30 % skupnega obsega proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti, in ta stopnja se šteje za visoko in pretirano.
The level of closing stocks of the Community industry first decreased by 29 % in 2003 and then sharply increased by 140 percentage points in 2004, before rising by a further 27 percentage points in the IP compared to 2004.
Stopnja končnih zalog industrije Skupnosti se je leta 2003 najprej zmanjšala za 29 %, nato močno narasla za 140 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in nato še za 27 odstotnih točk v OP v primerjavi z letom 2004.
During the IP, the Community industry’s stocks ranged between 10000 pieces and 30000 pieces.
Med OP so zaloge proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti znašale med 10000 in 30000 kosi.
Closing stock (pieces)
Končne zaloge (kosov)
The sales by the Community industry of its own production on the Community market to unrelated customers first increased by 284 % in 2003, rose further by 37 percentage points in 2004, but declined by 6 percentage points in the IP.
Prodaja lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti nepovezanim strankam na trgu Skupnosti se je leta 2003 najprej povečala za 284 %, leta 2004 še za 37 odstotnih točk, vendar se je zmanjšala za 6 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s sales volume ranged between 50000 pieces and 90000 pieces.
Med OP je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti znašal med 50000 in 90000 kosi.
EC Sales volume to unrelated customers (pieces)
Obseg prodaje ES nepovezanim strankam (kosov)
The index reflecting the evolution of the market share held by the Community industry rose by 154 % in 2003, when it reached a peak, then declined by 48 percentage points in 2004 and by a further 13 percentage points in the IP.
Indeks, ki odraža razvoj tržnega deleža industrije Skupnosti, je leta 2003, ko je dosegel vrh, zrasel za 154 %, se nato leta 2004 zmanjšal za 48 odstotnih točk in za nadaljnjih 13 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s market share ranged between 10 % and 20 %.
Med OP je tržni delež industrije Skupnosti znašal med 10 % in 20 %.
Between 2003 and the IP, when the Community consumption increased by 64 percentage points, the volume of sales of the Community industry on the Community market increased by only 31 percentage points.
Med letom 2003 in OP, ko je poraba Skupnosti narasla za 64 odstotnih točk, se je obseg prodaje industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti povečal samo za 31 odstotnih točk.
The Community industry lost around 4 percentage points of market share, whereas dumped imports gained around 6 percentage points of market share between 2003 and the IP.
Industrija Skupnosti je izgubila približno 4 odstotne točke tržnega deleža, medtem ko je dampinški uvoz med 2003 in OP pridobil 6 odstotnih točk tržnega deleža.
The employment level of the Community industry first increased by 110 % between 2002 and 2003, increased further by 102 percentage points in 2004, but declined by 14 percentage points in the IP.
Stopnja zaposlenosti industrije Skupnosti se je med 2002 in 2003 povečala za 110 % in nato še za 102 odstotni točki leta 2004, vendar se je zmanjšala za 14 odstotnih točk v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s employment ranged between 300 and 500 persons.
Med OP je zaposlenost v industriji Skupnosti znašala med 300 in 500 osebami.
Employment (persons)
Zaposlenost (oseb)
Productivity of the Community industry's workforce, measured as output (pieces) per person employed per year, first increased strongly by 46 % from 2002 to 2003, dropped by 5 percentage points in 2004, and decreased by a further 5 percentage points in the IP.
Produktivnost industrije Skupnosti, merjena kot letna proizvodnja (kosov) na zaposlenega, se je od leta 2002 do 2003 najprej močno povečala za 46 %, padla za 5 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in še za nadaljnjih 5 odstotnih točk med OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s productivity ranged between 100 pieces and 300 pieces per person.
Med OP je produktivnost industrije Skupnosti znašala med 100 in 300 kosi na osebo.
Productivity (pieces per employee)
Produktivnost (kosov na zaposlenega)
Between 2002 and the IP, the average wage per employee declined by 16 %.
Med letoma 2002 in OP se je povprečna plača zaposlenega znižala za 16 %.
Specifically, it decreased by 3 % in 2003, by a further 11 percentage points in 2004 and finally by 2 percentage points in the IP.
Izrecno so se plače znižale za 3 % leta 2003, nato še za nadaljnjih 11 odstotnih točk leta 2004 in končno še za 2 odstotni točki v OP.
Unit prices for Community sales to unrelated customers of Community industry’s own production decreased by 4 % between 2002 and the IP, although there has been a constant improvement in the functionalities of the models offered for sale, year after year.
Cene na enoto za prodajo v Skupnosti lastne proizvodnje industrije Skupnosti nepovezanim strankam so med letom 2002 in OP padle za 4 %, kljub vsakoletnim izboljšavam funkcij prodajanih modelov.
Specifically, prices stayed approximately at the same level between 2002 and 2004, but experienced a drop by 4 percentage points in the IP.
Izrecno so cene ostale na približno enaki stopnji med letoma 2002 in 2004, vendar nato padle za 4 odstotne točke v OP.
During the IP, the Community industry’s average unit price ranged between 500 and 1500 euros.
Med OP je povprečna cena na enoto v industriji Skupnosti znašala med 500 in 1500 EUR.
Unit price EC market (EUR/piece)
Cena na enoto na trgu ES (EUR/kos)
The investigation showed that dumped imports were undercutting the average depressed sales price of the Community industry by 34 to 42 % in the IP.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je v OP dampinški uvoz nelojalno nižal povprečne znižane prodajne cene industrije Skupnosti za 34 do 42 %.
However, on a type-by-type basis, it was found that in some instances prices offered by the exporting producers concerned were significantly lower than the above average undercutting of the Community industry’s prices.
Vendar je bilo na osnovi primerjave od tipa do tipa ugotovljeno, da so bile cene, ki so jih ponudili zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki, včasih znatno nižje od zgoraj navedenega povprečnega nelojalnega nižanja cen industrije Skupnosti.
The combination of this undercutting established on a more individual product type level with the growing market share held by dumped imports certainly increased the price pressure and thus affected the domestic prices of the Community industry.
Kombinacija tega nelojalnega nižanja cen na ravni bolj individualnih tipov izdelka in vse večjega tržnega deleža dampinških uvozov je gotovo povečala pritisk na cene in tako vplivala na domače cene industrije Skupnosti.
During the period considered, the profitability of the own produced sales in the Community of the Community industry, expressed as a percentage of net sales, remained negative throughout the period 2002 to the IP.
V obravnavanem obdobju je dobičkonosnost prodaje lastnih izdelkov industrije Skupnosti v Skupnost, izražena kot odstotek neto prodaje, ostala negativna v celem obdobju od leta 2002 do OP.
Losses were very high in 2002, due to the fact that the facility started its operation that year.
Ker je objekt leta 2002 začel z obratovanjem, so bile izgube v tem letu zelo visoke.
Profitability improved up to an almost break-even level in 2003, but subsequently deteriorated in 2004 and again reached significant losses in the IP.
Dobičkonosnost se je leta 2003 povečala skoraj do praga dobička, vendar nato leta 2004 upadla, tako da je v OP ponovno ustvarila veliko izgubo.
Profitability of EC sales to unrelated (% of net sales)
Dobičkonosnost prodaje ES nepovezanim (% neto prodaje)
ROI (profit in % of net book value of investments)
Donosnost naložb (dobiček v % čiste knjigovodske vrednosti naložb)
The return on investments (ROI), expressed as the profit in percent of the net book value of investments, broadly followed the above profitability trend.
Donosnost naložb, izražena kot dobiček v odstotkih čiste knjigovodske vrednosti naložb, je na splošno sledila trendu omenjene dobičkonosnosti.
It also remained negative through the period considered.
V obravnavanem obdobju je prav tako ostala negativna.
It first improved markedly in 2003, but then deteriorated in 2004 and the IP.
Prvič se je opazno izboljšala leta 2003, vendar je potem v letu 2004 in OP upadla.
The net cash flow from operating activities remained also negative through the period considered.
Denarni tok iz poslovanja je v obravnavanem obdobju prav tako ostal negativen.
From its very low level of 2002, it improved up to a level close to zero, before deteriorating again in 2004 and the IP.
Iz zelo nizke stopnje leta 2002 je naraščal in dosegel stopnjo blizu ničle ter nato leta 2004 in v OP ponovno upadel.
Because of its poor return, the Community industry was unable to raise further capital from within the group to which it belongs and had to put on hold its plans for further expansion of production.
Zaradi slabe donosnosti industrija Skupnosti ni mogla zbrati več kapitala iz skupine, ki ji pripada, in je morala odložiti načrte za nadaljnjo širitev proizvodnje.
Indeed, in a multinational group, like the one to which the Community industry belongs, financial resources are generally allocated to the most profitable entities.
V mednarodni skupini, kamor spada industrija Skupnosti, se finančna sredstva običajno dodelijo najdonosnejšim enotam.