natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
dibutyl phthalate (DBP)
dibutil ftalat (DBP)
CAS No 84-74-2
št. CAS 84-74-2
Einecs No 201-557-4
št. EINECS 201-557-4
CAS No 85-68-7
št. CAS 85-68-7
Einecs No 201-622-7
št. EINECS 201-622-7
Shall not be used as substances or as constituents of preparations, at concentrations of greater than 0,1 % by mass of the plasticised material, in toys and childcare articles.
Se ne uporabljajo v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok kot snovi ali sestavine pripravkov v koncentracijah, ki presegajo 0,1 masnega % plastificiranega materiala.
Such toys and childcare articles containing these phthalates in a concentration greater than the limit mentioned above shall not be placed on the market.
Igrače in predmeti za nego otrok, ki vsebujejo ftalate v koncentraciji, ki presega zgoraj navedeno mejo, se ne dajejo na trg.
[XXa.] The following phthalates (or other CAS- and EINECS numbers covering the substance):
[XXa.] Naslednji ftalati (ali druge številke po CAS in po EINECS, ki zajemajo to snov):
di-“isononyl” phthalate (DINP)
di-‚isononil’ ftalat (DINP)
CAS No 28553-12-0 and 68515-48-0
št. CAS 28553-12-0 in 68515-48-0
Einecs No 249-079-5 and 271-090-9
št. EINECS 249-079-5 in 271-090-9
di-“isodecyl” phthalate (DIDP)
di-‚izodecil’ ftalat (DIDP)
CAS No 26761-40-0 and 68515-49-1
št. CAS 26761-40-0 in 68515-49-1
Einecs No 247-977-1 and 271-091-4
št. EINECS 247-977-1 in 271-091-4
di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP)
di-n-oktil ftalat (DNOP)
CAS No 117-84-0
št. CAS 117-84-0
Einecs No 204-214-7
št. EINECS 204-214-7
Shall not be used as substances or as constituents of preparations, at concentrations of greater than 0,1 % by mass of the plasticised material, in toys and childcare articles which can be placed in the mouth by children.
Se ne uporabljajo v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok, ki jih otroci lahko dajejo v usta, kot snovi ali sestavine pripravkov v koncentracijah, ki presegajo 0,1 masnega % plastificiranega materiala.
Such toys and childcare articles containing these phthalates in a concentration greater than the limit mentioned above shall not be placed on the market.’
Igrače in predmeti za nego otrok, ki vsebujejo ftalate v koncentraciji, ki presega zgoraj navedeno mejo, se ne dajejo na trg.“
“childcare article” means any product intended to facilitate sleep, relaxation, hygiene, the feeding of children or sucking on the part of children.’
‚predmet za nego otrok’ pomeni vsak izdelek, namenjen za lajšanje spanja, sproščanje, higieno ali hranjenje otrok ali za to, da ga otroci sesajo.“
Corrigendum to Directive 2005/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles)
Popravek Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/84/ES z dne 14. decembra 2005 o dvaindvajseti spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov (ftalatov v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok)
(Official Journal of the European Union L 344 of 27 December 2005)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 344 z dne 27. decembra 2005)
On page 43, in the Annex, in the column regarding numbering of phthalates:
Stran 40, Priloga, oštevilčenje ftalatov:
„[XX.]“ and „[XXa.]“,
„[XX.]“ in „[XXa.]“
„51.“ and „51a.“
„51.“ in „52a.“
Addendum
Dodatek
to the Directive 2005/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2005 amending for the 22nd time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (phthalates in toys and childcare articles)
k Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/84/ES z dne 14. decembra 2005 o dvaindvajseti. spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov (ftalatov v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok)
The following Statements are added:
Dodajo se naslednje izjave:
Statement by the Commission concerning the guidance document
Izjava Komisije v zvezi s pisnim navodilom
As soon as the Directive relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of phthalates in toys and childcare articles (22nd amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous preparations) is adopted, the Commission, in consultation with Member States'experts responsible for the management of Directive 76/769/EEC and stakeholders, will prepare a guidance document in order to facilitate the implementation of the Directive.
Takoj ko se sprejeme Direktiva o omejitvah pri trženju in uporabi falatov v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok (22. sprememba Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS o omejitvah pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih pripravkov), bo Komisija po posvetovanju s strokovnjaki iz držav članic, odgovornimi za izvajanje Direktive 76/769/EGS, in z interesnimi skupinami pripravila pisna navodila, ki bodo olajšala izvajanje Direktive.
The document will address in particular the provisions on restrictions of certain substances in toys and childcare articles intended for children insofar as they concern the condition ‘which can be placed in the mouth’ as specified in the annex to the Directive.
Dokument bo obravnaval zlasti določbe o omejitvah nekaterih snovi v igračah in predmetih za nego otrok, namenjenih otrokom, kolikor gre za igrače, „ki jih lahko dajo v usta“, kot je določeno v prilogi k Direktivi.
In the context of this work, the aspects related to ‘accessible’ plasticized material and ‘handheld’ toys will be examined.
V smislu tega dela se bodo preučili vidiki v zvezi z „dostopnimi“ mehčalnimi snovmi in „ročnimi“ igračami.
Statement concerning fragrances
Izjava v zvezi z dišavami
The Commission confirms its intention to address the issue of fragrances in toys in the framework of the revision of Council Directive 88/378/EEC on the safety of toys.
Komisija poudarja, da se namerava posvetiti vprašanju dišav v igračah v sklopu revizije Direktive Sveta 88/378/EGS o varnosti igrač.
This will have the advantage to identify exactly what should be understood as fragrances, consider the appropriate measures to deal with the risks identified and ensure consistency with the other legislative provisions of the said Directive.
Prednosti pri tem bodo naslednje: natančno se bo opredelilo, kaj so dišave; obravnavani bodo ukrepi, s katerimi naj bi se spopadli z ugotovljenimi tveganji; poskrbljeno bo za usklajenost z drugimi pravnimi predpisi iz navedene direktive.
Council Directive 2005/85/EC
Direktiva Sveta 2005/85/ES
on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular point (1)(d) of the first paragraph of Article 63 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti točke (1)(d) prvega odstavka člena 63 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee [3],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora [3],
A common policy on asylum, including a Common European Asylum System, is a constituent part of the European Union’s objective of establishing progressively an area of freedom, security and justice open to those who, forced by circumstances, legitimately seek protection in the Community.
Skupna azilna politika, vključno s skupnim evropskim azilnim sistemom, je sestavni del cilja Evropske unije, da se postopno oblikuje območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, odprto za vse, ki jih okoliščine prisilijo k legitimnemu iskanju zaščite v Skupnosti.
The European Council, at its special meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, agreed to work towards establishing a Common European Asylum System, based on the full and inclusive application of the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the status of refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention), thus affirming the principle of non-refoulement and ensuring that nobody is sent back to persecution.
Evropski svet je na posebnem zasedanju v Tampereju dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 soglašal, da si bo prizadeval za oblikovanje skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema, ki bo temeljil na popolni in skupni uporabi Ženevske konvencije o statusu beguncev z dne 28. julija 1951, kot je bila spremenjena z Newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967 (v nadaljevanju „Ženevska konvencija“), s čimer se bo potrdilo načelo nevračanja in se bo zagotovilo, da nihče ne bo poslan nazaj na področje, kjer je trpel preganjanje.
The Tampere Conclusions provide that a Common European Asylum System should include, in the short term, common standards for fair and efficient asylum procedures in the Member States and, in the longer term, Community rules leading to a common asylum procedure in the European Community.
Sklepi iz Tampereja predvidevajo, da bi moral skupni evropski azilni sistem kratkoročno vključevati skupne standarde za pravične in učinkovite azilne postopke v državah članicah, dolgoročno pa pravila Skupnosti, ki bodo pripeljala do skupnega azilnega postopka v Evropski skupnosti.
The minimum standards laid down in this Directive on procedures in Member States for granting or withdrawing refugee status are therefore a first measure on asylum procedures.
Minimalni standardi glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah, ki jih določa ta direktiva, so torej prvi ukrep na področju azilnih postopkov.
The main objective of this Directive is to introduce a minimum framework in the Community on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status.
Glavni cilj te direktive je določiti minimalni okvir glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v Skupnosti.
The approximation of rules on the procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status should help to limit the secondary movements of applicants for asylum between Member States, where such movement would be caused by differences in legal frameworks.
Približevanje postopkovnih pravil za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca naj pripomore k omejevanju sekundarnega gibanja prosilcev za azil med državami članicami v primerih, ko do teh gibanj prihaja zaradi razlik v pravnih okvirih držav članic.
It is in the very nature of minimum standards that Member States should have the power to introduce or maintain more favourable provisions for third country nationals or stateless persons who ask for international protection from a Member State, where such a request is understood to be on the grounds that the person concerned is a refugee within the meaning of Article 1(A) of the Geneva Convention.
V sami naravi minimalnih standardov je, da morajo imeti države članice možnost uvesti ali ohraniti ugodnejše določbe za državljane tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, ki državo članico prosijo za mednarodno zaščito, kadar takšna prošnja temelji na tem, da je oseba begunec v smislu 1(A) Ženevske konvencije.
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta direktiva spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, ki so priznana zlasti z Listino o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije.
With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit discrimination.
Pri obravnavanju oseb, ki sodijo na področje uporabe te direktive, so države članice vezane z obveznostmi iz mednarodnih instrumentov, katerih pogodbenice so in ki prepovedujejo diskriminacijo.
It is essential that decisions on all applications for asylum be taken on the basis of the facts and, in the first instance, by authorities whose personnel has the appropriate knowledge or receives the necessary training in the field of asylum and refugee matters.
Bistvenega pomena je, da se odločbe v zvezi z vsemi prošnjami za azil izdajo na podlagi ugotovljenih dejstev in da jih na prvi stopnji izdajo organi, katerih osebje ima ustrezno znanje ali se je udeležilo potrebnega usposabljanja za delo na področju azila in beguncev.
It is in the interest of both Member States and applicants for asylum to decide as soon as possible on applications for asylum.
V interesu držav članic in prosilcev za azil je, da se o prošnjah za azil odloči kakor hitro je to mogoče.
The organisation of the processing of applications for asylum should be left to the discretion of Member States, so that they may, in accordance with their national needs, prioritise or accelerate the processing of any application, taking into account the standards in this Directive.
Države članice obravnavanje prošenj za azil organizirajo po lastni presoji, tako da lahko v skladu z nacionalnimi potrebami in ob upoštevanju standardov te direktive dajo prednost posamezni prošnji ali pospešijo postopek v zvezi z njo.
The notion of public order may cover a conviction for committing a serious crime.
Pojem javnega reda lahko vključuje obsodbo za hudo kaznivo dejanje.
In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, subject to certain exceptions, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to cooperate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and sufficient procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case throughout all stages of the procedure.
Da bi lahko pravilno ugotovili, katere osebe potrebujejo zaščito kot begunci v smislu člena 1 Ženevske konvencije, bi moral imeti vsak prosilec, razen določenih izjem, dejanski dostop do postopkov, možnost sodelovati in ustrezno komunicirati s pristojnimi organi, kar naj mu omogoči, da predstavi vsa pomembna dejstva v zvezi s svojim primerom, ter zadostna postopkovna jamstva, da lahko v vseh fazah postopka brani svoj primer.
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should normally provide an applicant at least with the right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can reasonably be supposed to understand.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba v postopku obravnavanja prošnje za azil prosilcu zagotoviti vsaj pravico do bivanja, dokler organ za presojo ne izda odločbe, dostop do storitev tolmačenja na morebitnem razgovoru s pristojnimi organi ob vložitvi njegove prošnje, možnost komuniciranja s predstavnikom Visokega komisariata za begunce pri Organizaciji združenih narodov (UNHCR) ali s katero drugo organizacijo, ki deluje v imenu UNHCR, pravico do ustrezne vročitve odločbe ter njene dejanske in pravne utemeljitve, možnost posvetovanja s pravnim ali drugim svetovalcem ter v odločilnih fazah postopka pravico do obveščenosti o njegovem pravnem položaju v jeziku, za katerega se lahko upravičeno domneva, da ga razume.
In addition, specific procedural guarantees for unaccompanied minors should be laid down on account of their vulnerability.
Prav tako je treba zaradi njihove ranljivosti določiti posebna postopkovna jamstva za mladoletnike brez spremstva.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be a primary consideration of Member States.
V tem okviru bi morala biti korist otroka najpomembnejše vodilo držav članic.
Where an applicant makes a subsequent application without presenting new evidence or arguments, it would be disproportionate to oblige Member States to carry out a new full examination procedure.
Če prosilec vloži naknadno prošnjo, ne da bi predložil nove dokaze ali navedbe, bi bila zahteva, da države članice ponovno izpeljejo celoten postopek, nesorazmerna.
In these cases, Member States should have a choice of procedure involving exceptions to the guarantees normally enjoyed by the applicant.
V teh primerih bi morala imeti država članica možnost izbire med postopki, ki vključujejo izjeme od jamstev, ki so sicer zagotovljena prosilcu.
Many asylum applications are made at the border or in a transit zone of a Member State prior to a decision on the entry of the applicant.
Številne prošnje za azil so vložene na meji ali na tranzitnem območju države članice, preden se odloči, ali se bo prosilcu dovolilo vstop ali ne.
Member States should be able to keep existing procedures adapted to the specific situation of these applicants at the border.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba omogočiti, da ohranijo obstoječe postopke, prilagojene posebnemu položaju teh prosilcev na meji.
Common rules should be defined on possible exceptions made in these circumstances to the guarantees normally enjoyed by applicants.
Za te okoliščine bi bilo treba določiti splošna pravila za možne izjeme od jamstev, ki bi bila prosilcu zagotovljena sicer.
Border procedures should mainly apply to those applicants who do not meet the conditions for entry into the territory of the Member States.
Postopki na meji bi se morali uporabljali predvsem za tiste prosilce, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev za vstop na ozemlje države članice.
A key consideration for the well-foundedness of an asylum application is the safety of the applicant in his/her country of origin.
Bistveno vodilo pri ocenjevanju utemeljenosti posamezne prošnje za azil je varnost prosilca v njegovi izvorni državi.
Where a third country can be regarded as a safe country of origin, Member States should be able to designate it as safe and presume its safety for a particular applicant, unless he/she presents serious counter-indications.
Če je možno tretjo državo šteti za varno izvorno državo, bi bilo treba državam članicam omogočiti, da jo označijo za varno in da domnevajo, da je varna tudi za posameznega prosilca, razen če prosilec predloži resne nasprotne dokaze.
Given the level of harmonisation achieved on the qualification of third country nationals and stateless persons as refugees, common criteria for designating third countries as safe countries of origin should be established.
Glede na raven usklajenosti pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav in osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca, bi bilo treba določiti tudi skupna merila za označitev tretjih držav za varne izvorne države.
Where the Council has satisfied itself that those criteria are met in relation to a particular country of origin, and has consequently included it in the minimum common list of safe countries of origin to be adopted pursuant to this Directive, Member States should be obliged to consider applications of persons with the nationality of that country, or of stateless persons formerly habitually resident in that country, on the basis of the rebuttable presumption of the safety of that country.
Če Svet oceni, da določena izvorna država izpolnjuje ta merila in jo na podlagi tega uvrsti na minimalni skupni seznam varnih izvornih držav, ki se sprejme na podlagi te direktive, bi bilo treba države članice obvezati, da obravnavajo prošnje oseb, ki imajo državljanstvo te države, ali prošnje oseb brez državljanstva, ki so prej stalno prebivale v tej državi, na podlagi izpodbojne domneve o varnosti te države.
In the light of the political importance of the designation of safe countries of origin, in particular in view of the implications of an assessment of the human rights situation in a country of origin and its implications for the policies of the European Union in the field of external relations, the Council should take any decisions on the establishment or amendment of the list, after consultation of the European Parliament.
Zaradi političnega pomena označitve izvornih držav za varne, še posebej zaradi posledic ocene spoštovanja človekovih pravic v izvorni državi in vpliva take ocene na politiko Evropske unije na področju zunanjih zadev, naj Svet vsako odločitev o pripravi ali spremembi takega seznama sprejme po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom.
It results from the status of Bulgaria and Romania as candidate countries for accession to the European Union and the progress made by these countries towards membership that they should be regarded as constituting safe countries of origin for the purposes of this Directive until the date of their accession to the European Union.
Ker imata Bolgarija in Romunija status držav kandidatk za pristop k Evropski uniji in sta dosegli določen napredek na tem področju, bi je bilo treba za namene te direktive do dne pristopa k Evropski uniji šteti za varni izvorni državi.
The designation of a third country as a safe country of origin for the purposes of this Directive cannot establish an absolute guarantee of safety for nationals of that country.
Označitev tretje države za varno izvorno državo za namene te direktive ne more predstavljati absolutnega zagotovila za varnost državljanov te države.
By its very nature, the assessment underlying the designation can only take into account the general civil, legal and political circumstances in that country and whether actors of persecution, torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are subject to sanction in practice when found liable in the country concerned.
Ocena, na kateri temelji takšna označitev, lahko že zaradi svoje narave upošteva le splošne državljanske, pravne in politične okoliščine v tej državi ter to, ali so v zadevni državi subjekti preganjanja, mučenja ali nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja dejansko podvrženi sankcijam, kadar so spoznani za krive.
For this reason, it is important that, where an applicant shows that there are serious reasons to consider the country not to be safe in his/her particular circumstances, the designation of the country as safe can no longer be considered relevant for him/her.
Zato je pomembno, da se označitev zadevne države za varno ne uporablja za prosilca, ki izkaže, da ob upoštevanju njegovih posebnih okoliščin obstajajo resni razlogi zoper štetje te države za varno.
Member States should examine all applications on the substance, i.e. assess whether the applicant in question qualifies as a refugee in accordance with Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted [4], except where the present Directive provides otherwise, in particular where it can be reasonably assumed that another country would do the examination or provide sufficient protection.
Države članice bi morale preučiti vsebinsko utemeljenost vseh prošenj, tj. oceniti, ali zadevni prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje za priznanje statusa begunca v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o minimalnih standardih glede pogojev, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati državljani tretjih držav ali osebe brez državljanstva, da se jim prizna status begunca ali osebe, ki iz drugih razlogov potrebuje mednarodno zaščito, in o vsebini te zaščite [4], razen če ta direktiva določa drugače, tj. še zlasti kadar se lahko upravičeno domneva, da bo zadevo preučila ali zagotovila zadostno zaščito druga država.