natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the light of the evidence available, i.e. the information submitted by the applicant and the fact that almost all parts were imported from the PRC in the form of kits from a related company subject to measures, it was concluded that the operations taking place in Pakistan during the IP should be considered as assembly operations circumventing the definitive anti–dumping duties in force.
Glede na razpoložljive dokaze, tj. informacije, ki jo je predložil vlagatelj, in dejstvo, da so bili skoraj vsi deli uvoženi iz Kitajske, in sicer v obliki kompletov iz povezane družbe, za katero veljajo ukrepi, je bilo sklenjeno, da je treba dejavnosti, ki so potekale v Pakistanu v obdobju preiskave, šteti za aktivnosti sestavljanja, ki se izogibajo veljavnim dokončnim protidampinškim dajatvam.
Insufficient due cause or no economic justification other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty
Nezadosten ustrezen vzrok ali druga ekonomska upravičenost razen uvedbe protidampinške dajatve
The investigation revealed further facts which confirmed that the assembly operations in Pakistan had no other due cause or economic justification than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty.
Preiskava je odkrila nova dejstva, ki so potrdila, da za aktivnosti sestavljanja v Pakistanu ni drugega ustreznega vzroka ali ekonomske upravičenosti razen uvedbe protidampinške dajatve.
The change described above in the pattern of trade coincided with the establishment of assembly operations of CFL-i in Pakistan.
Zgoraj opisana sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja je sovpadla z začetkom aktivnosti sestavljanja CFL-i v Pakistanu.
It was also found that while sales of CFL-i to the Community were made from Pakistan, the Chinese related company continued supplying other markets directly from the PRC.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da prodaja CFL-i v Skupnost sicer poteka iz Pakistana, da pa je povezana kitajska družba še naprej dobavljala na druge trge neposredno iz Kitajske.
Customers of Ecopak Lighting in the Community ordered CLF-i directly from the related company in China.
Odjemalci družbe Ecopak Lighting v Skupnosti so CFL-i naročali neposredno pri povezani družbi v Kitajski.
The exporter claimed that the reason for starting the operation in Pakistan was in particular the favourable environment for foreign investments, improved infrastructure and low labour costs in Pakistan.
Izvoznik je trdil, da so razlogi za začetek dejavnosti v Pakistanu zlasti ugodno okolje za tuje naložbe, izboljšana infrastruktura in nizki stroški dela v Pakistanu.
The company also claimed that the Community market is different from other markets with regard to demand, product types and prices which required a different export strategy than for other markets.
Družba je tudi trdila, da se trg Skupnosti razlikuje od drugih trgov glede povpraševanja, vrst in cen izdelka, zaradi česar je potrebna drugačna izvozna strategija kot pri drugih trgih.
However, none of these arguments could be supported by sufficient evidence and the company could not show that these factors were taken into consideration at the time of the decision to start the operation in Pakistan.
Vendar nobena od teh trditev ni bila podprta z zadostnimi dokazi in družba ni mogla dokazati, da so se ti dejavniki upoštevali pri odločanju o začetku dejavnosti v Pakistanu.
Indeed the results of the on-the-spot verification strongly contradicted the company’s statements.
Pravzaprav so bili izsledki preveritve na kraju samem v hudem nasprotju s trditvami družbe.
Furthermore, as regards the interruption of the activity, the company was not able to provide a reasonable explanation.
Poleg tega družba ni mogla razumno obrazložiti prekinitve dejavnosti.
In any event, it is noted that the company could restart its assembly operations very easily, if it decided to do so.
Vsekakor se opozarja, da bi družba zlahka znova začela aktivnosti sestavljanja, če bi se tako odločila.
Given the above and since the company also admitted itself that the assembly operation started due to the anti-dumping duties in place in the Community, it was concluded that there was insufficient due cause and no economic justification for the change in the pattern of trade other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno in glede na dejstvo, da je tudi družba priznala, da se je aktivnost sestavljanja začela zaradi veljavnih protidampinških dajatev v Skupnosti, je bilo sklenjeno, da za spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja ni zadostnega ustreznega vzroka ali druge ekonomske upravičenosti razen uvedbe protidampinške dajatve.
The trade flow analysis on the basis of the Eurostat data shows that the change in the pattern of Community imports, which occurred after the imposition of definitive measures on imports originating in China, has undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in terms of quantities imported into the Community market.
Analiza trgovinskega toka, opravljena na podlagi podatkov Eurostata, kaže, da je sprememba v vzorcu uvoza v Skupnost, ki se je zgodila po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Kitajske, slabila popravljalni učinek protidampinških ukrepov v smislu uvoženih količin na trg Skupnosti.
Indeed, the Pakistani company even exported significantly more to the Community during the IP of this investigation than its related company in China had done during the investigation period of the original investigation.
Pravzaprav je pakistanska družba v obdobju te preiskave v Skupnost izvažala znatno več, kot je njena povezana družba na Kitajskem v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
With regard to the prices of the product consigned from Pakistan, it was found that the prices to unrelated customers in the Community were below the injury elimination level established for Community producers in the original investigation.
V zvezi s cenami izdelka, poslanega iz Pakistana, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so cene, ponujene nepovezanim odjemalcem v Skupnosti, pod ravnijo za odpravo škode, ki je bila določena za proizvajalce v Skupnosti v prvotni preiskavi.
Therefore, it was concluded that the imports from Pakistan of the product concerned undermined the remedial effects of the duty in terms of prices and quantities.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Pakistana cenovno in količinsko slabi popravljalni učinek dajatve.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, a comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the original investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation’s IP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Community frontier, duty unpaid, showed dumping for the imports of CFL-i consigned from Pakistan.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in členom 2(12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določenega v prvotni preiskavi, in tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen v obdobju te preiskave, izraženega kot odstotek cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, pokazala, da je uvoz CFL-i, poslanih iz Pakistana, dampinški.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence of the existence of circumvention practices by means of transhipment and assembly of the anti-dumping measures in force by imports consigned in Vietnam.
Zahtevek je vseboval dovolj prima facie dokazov, da gre pri uvozu izdelkov, poslanih iz Vietnama, za izogibanje veljavnim protidampinškim ukrepom s pretovarjanjem in sestavljanjem.
Four exporters/producers in Vietnam submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Štirje proizvajalci izvozniki v Vietnamu so odgovorili na vprašalnik.
On-the-spot verifications were carried out at the premises of three of them.
Na kraju samem se je preverilo tri izmed njih.
The fourth company (Halong Simexco) did not allow for an on-the-spot verification and therefore its reply to the questionnaire had to be considered unreliable.
Četrta družba (Halong Simexco) ni dovolila preveritve na kraju samem in je bilo zato treba njen odgovor na vprašalnik šteti za nezanesljivega.
Findings with regard to this company were based on facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ugotovitve v zvezi s to družbo so slonele na razpoložljivih podatkih v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
On this basis it was concluded that there was no reason to believe that the operations of this company did not constitute circumvention as defined in Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Na podlagi tega je bilo sklenjeno, da ni razloga za mnenje, da dejavnosti te družbe ne pomenijo izogibanja, kakor je opredeljeno s členom 13 osnovne uredbe.
As regards the remaining three companies, all established assembly/production lines of CFL-i in Vietnam.
Vse tri preostale družbe so v Vietnamu odprle obrate za sestavljanje/proizvodnjo CFL-i.
However, only one of them exported the product concerned to the Community during the IP (Eco Industries Vietnam).
Vendar je samo ena v obdobju preiskave izvažala zadevni izdelek v Skupnost (Eco Industries Vietnam).
Energy Research Vietnam started exporting after the IP, and therefore requested to be granted an exemption as a newcomer on the basis of Articles 11(4) and 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Družba Energy Research Vietnam je začela izvažati po obdobju preiskave in je zato predložila zahtevek, da se ji kot novinki odobri izvzetje na podlagi člena 11(4) in člena 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
Finally, Rang Dong Light Source and Vacuum Flask Joint Stock Company (Ralaco) did not export the product concerned at all during the IP or after this period.
Rang Dong Light Source and Vacuum Flask Joint Stock Company („Ralaco“) pa zadevnega izdelka ni izvažal ne v obdobju preiskave ne po njem.
With regard to this company, no conclusions could therefore be drawn as to whether definitive anti-dumping duties were being circumvented or not.
V zvezi s to družbo se zato ni dalo ugotoviti, ali je šlo za izogibanje dokončnim protidampinškim dajatvam ali ne.
The situation of this company will be reviewed upon request in cases where the conditions of Articles 11(4) and 13(4) are fulfilled.
Položaj te družbe se bo pregledal na zahtevo, če bodo izpolnjeni pogoji člena 11(4) in člena 13(4).
One of the companies mentioned in recital 65, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd, which did not export to the Community during the IP, started, however, exporting CFL-i after the IP and therefore requested to be treated as a newcomer in accordance with Articles 13(4) and 11(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ena od družb, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (65), Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd., ki v obdobju preiskave sicer ni izvažala v Skupnost, je začela izvažati CFL-i po OP in je zato vložila zahtevek, da se jo obravnava kot novinko v skladu s členom 13(4) in členom 11(4) osnovne uredbe.
The verification of this company’s questionnaire reply was, however, significantly impeded by, inter alia, the submission of misleading information (for instance hiding the existence of a stock of the product concerned sold to the Community), and the information submitted thus had to be considered as unreliable.
Preverjanje odgovora te družbe na vprašalnik je bilo med drugim zelo oteženo zaradi predložitve zavajajočih podatkov (na primer prikrivanje zaloge zadevnega izdelka, prodane v Skupnost), zato je bilo treba predložene informacije šteti za nezanesljive.
Moreover, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd omitted information concerning its purchase of a Vietnamese company for which the applicant submitted prima facie evidence of circumvention practices in the request.
Poleg tega Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd. ni navedel podatkov o svojem odkupu vietnamske družbe, za katero je vlagatelj v zahtevku predložil prima facie dokaz o izogibanju.
Finally, Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd did not allow an on-the-spot verification visit at the premises of its parent company in Hong Kong although it claimed that most of the documents relevant for the investigation would be located at that company.
Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd. tudi ni dovolil obiska zaradi preveritve na kraju samem v svoji matični družbi v Hongkonkgu, čeprav je trdil, da se v navedeni družbi nahaja večina dokumentov, pomembnih za preiskavo.
Given the above, it was concluded that Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd could not be considered as a cooperating party, and therefore the findings related to the company had to be made on the basis of the facts available.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bilo sklenjeno, da se Energy Research Vietnam Co. Ltd. ne more šteti za sodelujočo stranko, ugotovitve v zvezi z družbo pa je bilo treba utemeljiti na razpoložljivih podatkih.
On that basis, and in particular the evidence submitted by the complainant and the fact that the information provided in the questionnaire reply was largely deficient, it was concluded that the request of the company to be granted a newcomer status could not be assessed.
Glede na to in zlasti ob upoštevanju dokazov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, ter dejstva, da so bili odgovori na vprašalnik večinoma nepopolni, je bilo sklenjeno, da ni mogoče presojati o zahtevku družbe, da se ji podeli status novinke.
Subsequent to disclosure, the company argued that it had been fully cooperating and denied most of the findings detailed in recital 68.
Družba je po razkritju trdila, da je v celoti sodelovala, in je zanikala večino ugotovitev, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (68).
However, on the basis of the factual evidence collected by the Commission, these objections were found to be unsubstantiated and groundless.
Vendar je bilo na podlagi dejanskih dokazov, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, ugotovljeno, da so ti ugovori neutemeljeni in neupravičeni.
Therefore, the conclusions in recital 69 are confirmed.
Sklepa iz uvodne izjave (69) se zato potrdita.
Eco Industries Vietnam, a company mentioned in recital 65, is part of a group whose parent company, Eco International Inc., is located in the United States of America (USA).
Družba Eco Industries Vietnam, ki je navedena v uvodni izjavi (65), je del skupine, katere matična družba Eco International Inc. se nahaja v Združenih državah Amerike (ZDA).
The production facilities for CFL-i were established in August 2003 and exports to the Community started the same year.
Obrat za proizvodnjo CFL-i je bil postavljen avgusta 2003 in istega leta je začel izvažati v Skupnost.
Two related companies in the Community (Denmark and Spain) are involved in the import, sales and marketing of CLF-i in the Community.
Dve povezani družbi v Skupnosti (Danska in Španija) sta vključeni v izvoz, prodajo in trženje CFL-i v Skupnosti.
CLF-i manufactured in Vietnam are almost entirely exported to the Community (with the exception of some minor sales to Indonesia outside the IP). e3-light, the related Danish company, also purchased CFL-i via a related trader (Eco Industries China) from China and resold the product in the USA.
CFL-i, izdelane v Vietnamu, se skoraj v celoti izvažajo v Skupnost (razen manjše prodaje v Indonezijo zunaj OP). e3-light, povezana družba iz Danske, je tudi nabavljala CFL-i prek povezanega trgovca (Eco Industries China) iz Kitajske in preprodajala izdelek v ZDA.
The investigation revealed that the company’s accounts were not in line with international GAAP and that the accounts as a whole showed serious deficiencies and had therefore to be considered unreliable.
Preiskava je pokazala, da računovodska dokumentacija družbe ni v skladu z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi ter da je računovodska dokumentacija v celoti zelo pomanjkljiva in jo je zato treba šteti za nezanesljivo.
The company’s costs could therefore not be established on this basis.
Na ta način zato ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti stroškov družbe.
The investigation also revealed that, during the IP, the company in Vietnam imported almost all CLF-i components used for the production of CFL-i from China.
Preiskava je tudi razkrila, da je v obdobju preiskave družba v Vietnamu skoraj vse sestavne dele CFL-i, ki se uporabljajo za izdelovanje CFL-i, uvozila iz Kitajske.
Given that the precise value of the imported parts could not be assessed, the value added to these parts could not be calculated.
Glede na to, da se natančne vrednosti uvoženih delov ni dalo oceniti, ni bilo mogoče izračunati dodane vrednosti teh delov.
The company did not provide any reliable information which would have enabled an examination of the thresholds mentioned in Article 13(2)(b).
Družba ni predložila zanesljivih informacij, ki bi omogočile preučitev zgornjih vrednosti, navedenih v členu 13(2)(b).
As a consequence, the assessment regarding Eco Industries Vietnam had to be made on the basis of the facts available, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ocene v zvezi z Eco Industries Vietnam je bilo zato treba opraviti na podlagi razpoložljivih podatkov, skladno s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, in the light of the evidence available, i.e. the fact that the company started operations after the imposition of measures on the PRC, and that the majority of the parts are imported from the PRC, it was concluded that the operations of Eco Industries Vietnam during the IP should be considered as assembly operations circumventing the definitive anti-dumping duties in force.
Glede na razpoložljive dokaze, tj. dejstva, da je družba začela obratovati po uvedbi ukrepov za Kitajsko ter da se večina delov uvaža iz Kitajske, je bilo zato sklenjeno, da je treba obratovanje Eco Industries Vietnam v obdobju preiskave šteti za aktivnosti sestavljanja, ki se izogibajo veljavni protidampinški dajatvi.
Subsequent to disclosure, the company claimed that the Vietnamese production plant was almost exclusively supplying the Community because its capacity was not sufficient to supply other markets.
Po razkritju je družba zatrjevala, da je vietnamski proizvodni obrat dobavljal skoraj izključno za Skupnost, ker njegove zmogljivosti ne zadoščajo za dobavo na druge trge.
However, it could be verified that no production had taken place during a significant part of the IP and that therefore sufficient spare capacities to supply markets other than the Community would have been available.
Vendar je bilo mogoče preveriti, da med precejšnjim delom OP proizvodnje ni bilo in da bi torej zmogljivosti zadoščale za dobavo tudi na druge trge poleg Skupnosti.
The company also claimed that its accounts should be considered as reliable, since they were audited and stated to be in accordance with Vietnamese GAAP.
Družba je tudi trdila, da bi njena računovodska dokumentacija morala veljati za zanesljivo, saj je izvedena revizija pokazala, da je v skladu z vietnamskimi računovodskimi standardi.
In this context, it is recalled that the company did not keep any ledgers nor did the accounting system used by the company allow verification of the completeness and accuracy of the accounts.
V tem okviru se opozarja, da družba ni vodila knjig, računovodski sistem družbe pa ni omogočal preverjanja, ali je računovodska dokumentacija popolna in natančna.
Therefore, the conclusions in recital 74 are maintained.
Sklep iz uvodne izjave (74) ostaja zato nespremenjen.
The trade flow analysis shows that the change in the pattern of Community imports, which occurred since the imposition of definitive measures on imports originating in China, has undermined the remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in terms of quantities imported into the Community market.
Analiza trgovinskega toka kaže, da je sprememba v vzorcu uvoza v Skupnost, ki se je zgodila po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Kitajske, slabila popravljalni učinek protidampinških ukrepov v smislu uvoženih količin na trg Skupnosti.
Since only one company with exports of the product concerned during the IP to EU15 cooperated in the present investigation, the analysis for the rest of the companies, i.e. in terms of quantities and prices, had to be done on the basis of the data from Eurostat.
Ker je v tej preiskavi sodelovala samo ena družba, ki je v OP izvažala zadevni izdelek v EU-15, je bilo treba analizo za preostale družbe, tj. v zvezi s količinami in cenami, opraviti na podlagi podatkov iz Eurostata.
As shown in recitals 17 and 39, imports increased significantly, i.e. by more than 700 % since the imposition of definitive measures.
Kakor je navedeno v uvodnih izjavah (17) in (39), se je uvoz po uvedbi dokončnih ukrepov znatno povečal, tj. za več kot 700 %.
With regard to prices of the product consigned from Vietnam, it was found that the prices of Vietnamese exports were on average below the injury elimination level established for Community producers in the original investigation.
V zvezi s cenami izdelka, poslanega iz Vietnama, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so vietnamske izvozne cene v povprečju pod ravnijo za odpravo škode, ki je bila določena za proizvajalce v Skupnosti v prvotni preiskavi.
Therefore, it was concluded that the imports from Vietnam of the product concerned undermined the remedial effects of the duty in terms of prices and quantities.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz Vietnama cenovno in količinsko slabi popravljalni učinek dajatve.
The same conclusions apply to the analysis made on the exports of Eco Industries.
Enaki sklepi veljajo za analizo izvoza družbe Eco Industries.
In accordance with Article 2(11) and (12) of the basic Regulation, a comparison of the weighted average normal value as established in the original investigation and the weighted average of export prices during this investigation’s IP, expressed as a percentage of the CIF price at the Community frontier duty unpaid, showed dumping the imports of CFL-i consigned from Vietnam.
V skladu s členom 2(11) in členom 2(12) osnovne uredbe je primerjava tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določenega v prvotni preiskavi, in tehtanega povprečja izvoznih cen v obdobju te preiskave, izraženega kot odstotek cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, dajatev neplačana, pokazala, da je uvoz CFL-i, poslanih iz Vietnama, dampinški.
The same conclusion was reached when analysing the export prices of Eco Industries Vietnam.
Enaka ugotovitev je bila sprejeta pri analizi izvoznih cen družbe Eco Industries Vietnam.
Eco Industries Vietnam claimed that the normal values of the original investigation did not reflect the market characteristics in terms of prices during the IP and should therefore be recalculated or adjusted accordingly without further substantiating its claim.
Eco Industries Vietnam je zatrjeval, ne da bi predložil kak dodaten dokaz, da normalne vrednosti iz prvotne preiskave ne odražajo cenovnih tržnih značilnosti v obdobju preiskave in bi jih bilo zato treba na novo izračunati ali uskladiti.
It is noted that Article 13(2)(c) of the basic Regulation provides explicitly that evidence of dumping should be established in relation to the normal values previously established for like or similar products.
Opozarja se, da člen 13(2)(c) osnovne uredbe izrecno določa, da je damping treba dokazati glede na normalne vrednosti, ki se predhodno določijo za podobne ali sorodne izdelke.
The methodology used by the Commission was therefore in line with the basic Regulation and no adjustments or recalculations of the normal value during the current IP were warranted.
Metodologija, ki jo je uporabila Komisija, je bila torej v skladu z osnovno uredbo in zahteve po usklajevanju ali ponovnem izračunavanju normalnih vrednosti so bile neutemeljene.
The company also claimed that in constructing the export price of Eco Industries Vietnam in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, a significant amount of selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) of the Danish related importer (e3light) was wrongly included in the calculation, since this amount would concern services provided to the American parent company and was therefore not related to the sales of the product concerned in the Community, but the company did not provide any evidence supporting this claim.
Družba je tudi trdila, ne da bi predložila dokaze za svojo trditev, da je pri računskem določanju izvoznih cen Eco Industries Vietnam v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe izračun napačno zajel precejšen znesek prodajnih, splošnih in administrativnih stroškov povezanega uvoznika iz Danske (e3 light), saj naj bi se ta znesek nanašal na storitve, opravljene za ameriško matično družbo, in torej ni povezan s prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti.