natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Directive 2000/29/EC, a financial contribution from the Community may be granted to Member States to cover expenditure relating directly to the necessary measures which have been taken or are planned to be taken for the purpose of combating harmful organisms introduced from third countries or from other areas in the Community, in order to eradicate or, if that is not possible, to contain them.
V skladu z Direktivo 2000/29/ES se državam članicam lahko dodeli finančni prispevek Skupnosti za kritje izdatkov, ki se neposredno nanašajo na potrebne ukrepe, sprejete ali načrtovane za boj proti škodljivim organizmom, vnesenim iz tretjih držav ali drugih območij v Skupnosti, za izkoreninjenje, ali če to ni mogoče, preprečevanje njihovega širjenja.
Belgium and Germany have each established a programme of actions to eradicate organisms harmful to plants introduced in their territories.
Belgija in Nemčija sta uvedli program dejavnosti za izkoreninjenje organizmov, škodljivih za rastline, ki so bili vneseni na njuno ozemlje.
These programmes specify the objectives to be achieved, the measures carried out, their duration and their cost.
Oba programa določata cilje, ki naj bi se dosegli, ukrepe, ki naj bi se izvedli, ter njihovo trajanje in stroške.
Belgium and Germany have applied for the allocation of a Community financial contribution to these programmes within the time limit set out in Directive 2000/29/EC and in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 1040/2002 of 14 June 2002 establishing detailed rules for the implementation of the provisions relating to the allocation of a financial contribution from the Community for plant-health control and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2051/97 [2].
Belgija in Nemčija sta zaprosili za dodelitev finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za navedene programe v rokih, določenih v Direktivi 2000/29/ES, in v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1040/2002 z dne 14. junija 2002 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje določb v zvezi z dodeljevanjem finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za obvladovanje zdravstvenega varstva rastlin in o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2051/97 [2].
The technical information provided for by Belgium and Germany has enabled the Commission to analyse the situation accurately and comprehensively and to conclude that the conditions for the granting of a Community financial contribution, as laid down in particular in Article 23 of Directive 2000/29/EC, have been met.
Tehnične informacije, ki sta jih poslali Belgija in Nemčija, so Komisiji omogočile, da je natančno in izčrpno analizirala stanje ter ugotovila, da so bili izpolnjeni pogoji za dodelitev finančnega prispevka Skupnosti, kakor jih določa zlasti člen 23 Direktive 2000/29/ES.
Accordingly, it is appropriate to provide a Community financial contribution to cover the expenditure on these programmes.
Zato je primerno, da Skupnost zagotovi finančni prispevek za kritje izdatkov v zvezi s temi programi.
However, in accordance with Article 23(5) third paragraph of the Directive, the rate of the Community financial contribution for the programme presented by Belgium should be reduced as the programme notified by this Member State has already been the subject of Community funding under Commission Decision 2004/772/EC [3] and 2005/789/EC [4].
Vendar pa je treba v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 23(5) Direktive zmanjšati višino finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za program, ki ga je predstavila Belgija, ker je bil za program, ki ga je prijavila ta država članica, že dodeljen prispevek Skupnosti v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2004/772/ES [3] in 2005/789/ES [4].
In accordance with Article 24 of Directive 2000/29/EC the Commission shall ascertain whether the introduction of the relevant harmful organism has been caused by inadequate examinations or inspections and adopt the measures required by the findings from its verification.
V skladu s členom 24 Direktive 2000/29/ES Komisija preveri, ali so vnos zadevnega škodljivega organizma povzročila neustrezna preverjanja ali inšpekcijski pregledi in sprejela potrebne ukrepe na podlagi ugotovitev, dobljenih s preverjanji.
In accordance with Article 3(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [5], plant-health measures are to be financed from the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund.
V skladu s členom 3(2)(a) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 z dne 21. junija 2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike [5] je treba ukrepe za zdravstveno varstvo rastlin financirati iz Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada.
For the purpose of financial control of these measures Articles 9, 36 and 37 of the above Regulation shall apply.
Za namene finančnega nadzora teh ukrepov se uporabljajo členi 9, 36 in 37 zgoraj navedene uredbe.
The allocation of a Community financial contribution for 2006 to cover expenditure incurred by Belgium and Germany relating to necessary measures as specified in Article 23(2) of Directive 2000/29/EC and taken for the purpose of combating the organisms concerned by the eradication programmes listed in the Annex is hereby approved.
Odobri se dodelitev finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za leto 2006 za kritje izdatkov, ki so nastali v Belgiji in Nemčiji v zvezi s potrebnimi ukrepi, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 23(2) Direktive 2000/29/ES in so bili izvedeni zaradi boja proti zadevnim organizmom s programi za izkoreninjenje, naštetimi v Prilogi.
The total amount of the financial contribution referred to in Article 1 is EUR 101423.
Celotni znesek finančnega prispevka iz člena 1 je 101423 EUR.
The maximum amounts of the Community financial contribution for each of the programmes shall be as indicated in the Annex.
Najvišji zneski finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za vsakega od programov so navedeni v Prilogi.
evidence of the measures taken has been given in accordance with the provisions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1040/2002.
dokazilo o sprejetih ukrepih je bilo predloženo v skladu z določbami iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1040/2002;
The payment of the financial contribution is without prejudice of the verifications by the Commission under Article 24 of Directive 2000/29/EC.
Plačilo finančnega prispevka Skupnosti ne vpliva na preverjanja, ki jih Komisija izvede v skladu s členom 24 Direktive 2000/29/ES.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium and the Federal Republic of Germany.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Belgijo in Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/35/EC (OJ L 88, 25.3.2006, p. 9).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/35/ES (UL L 88, 25.3.2006, str. 9).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 738/2005 (OJ L 122, 14.5.2005, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 738/2005 (UL L 122, 14.5.2005, str. 17).
OJ L 296, 12.11.2005, p. 42.
UL L 296,12.11.2005, str. 42.
a Year of implementation of the eradication programme.
a Leto izvajanja programa za izkoreninjenje.
Various trees
Različna drevesa
Total Community contribution (EUR)
Celotni prispevek Skupnosti (EUR)
terminating the anti-absorption reinvestigation concerning imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China
o zaključku ponovne preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev v zvezi z uvozom ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (the ‘basic Regulation’) [1] and in particular Articles 9 and 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti („osnovna uredba“) [1] in zlasti členov 9 in 12 Uredbe,
In July 2005, the Council imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 [2] a definitive anti-dumping duty (‘the original measures’) on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Julija 2005 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1174/2005 [2] uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev („prvotni ukrepi“) na uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Individual anti-dumping duty rates ranging from 7,6 % to 39,9 % were imposed on co-operating exporting producers in the PRC.
Za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike v Ljudski republiki Kitajski so bile uvedene individualne protidampinške dajatve od 7,6 % do 39,9 %.
The rate applicable to imports from all other companies is 46,7 %.
Za uvoz iz vseh drugih podjetij velja stopnja 46,7 %.
Request for an anti-absorption reinvestigation
Zahtevek za ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev
On 15 February 2006, a request for a reinvestigation of the original measures was lodged pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Dne 15. februarja 2006 je bil vložen zahtevek za ponovno preiskavo prvotnih ukrepov na podlagi člena 12 osnovne uredbe.
This request was submitted by four major Community producers of hand pallet trucks and essential parts thereof (BT Products AB, Franz Kahl GmbH, Bolzoni Auramo SpA and Pramac Lifter S.p.A) representing a major proportion, in this case more than 70 %, of the total Community production (‘the applicants’).
Zahtevek so vložili štirje največji proizvajalci ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov v Skupnosti (BT Products AB, Franz Kahl GmbH, Bolzoni Auramo SpA in Pramac Lifter S.p.A), ki predstavljajo velik delež, v tem primeru več kot 70 %, skupne proizvodnje v Skupnosti („vložniki“).
The applicants submitted sufficient prima facie information showing that the anti-dumping duty imposed on hand pallet trucks and essential parts thereof originating in the PRC has not led to any movement or sufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community, suggesting an increase in dumping and thus impeding the intended remedial effects of the anti-dumping measures in force.
Vložniki so predložili dovolj informacij prima facie, ki nakazujejo, da protidampinška dajatev na ročne vozičke za premeščanje palet in njihove osnovne dele s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske ni spremenila ali pa ni dovolj spremenila cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen v Skupnosti, kar kaže na povečanje dampinga in s tem tudi na oviranje nameravanih popravljalnih učinkov veljavnih protidampinških ukrepov.
The anti-absorption reinvestigation
Ponovna preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev
On 31 March 2006, the Commission announced by a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the initiation of a reinvestigation of the original measures pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je 31. marca 2006 v obvestilu, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], napovedala začetek ponovne preiskave prvotnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe.
The Commission officially advised the exporters/producers known to be concerned, the representatives of the exporting country, importers and users of the initiation of this reinvestigation.
Komisija je o začetku te ponovne preiskave uradno obvestila izvoznike/proizvajalce, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, predstavnike države izvoznice, uvoznike in uporabnike.
The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
Two sufficiently complete questionnaire replies were received from Chinese exporting producers, i.e. from Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd. and from Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd., both of which also co-operated in the original investigation.
Dva kitajska proizvajalca izvoznika, tj. Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd. in Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd., ki sta sodelovala tudi v prvotni preiskavi, sta predložila zadostno izpolnjena vprašalnika.
One other exporting producer, Yale Industrial Products Co. Ltd., only provided substantially incomplete information and was therefore, after having been duly informed, considered to be non co-operating in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Proizvajalec izvoznik Yale Industrial Products Co. Ltd. je predložil le zelo nepopolne informacije in se, po tem ko je bil uradno obveščen, šteje, da ni sodeloval v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Two other exporting producers which co-operated in the original investigation did not provide any information in the present absorption reinvestigation, i.e. Ningbo Liftstar Material Transport Equipment Factory and Ningbo Tailong Machinery Co. Ltd.
Proizvajalca izvoznika Ningbo Liftstar Material Transport Equipment Factory in Ningbo Tailong Machinery Co. Ltd, ki sta sodelovala v prvotni preiskavi, za to ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije nista predložila nobenih informacij.
Furthermore, nine importers of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts made themselves known, of which five sufficiently co-operated in the present reinvestigation.
Poleg tega se je odzvalo devet uvoznikov ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov, od katerih je pet zadostno sodelovalo v tej ponovni preiskavi.
The Commission sought and verified all the information deemed necessary for the purpose of this reinvestigation.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebne za namen te ponovne preiskave.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following exporting producers in the PRC:
Preveritveni obiski so bili opravljeni v prostorih naslednjih proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Ljudski republiki Kitajski:
Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd, Hangzhou and Ninghai, PRC;
Ningbo Ruyi Joint Stock Co. Ltd, Hangzhou in Ninghai, Ljudska republika Kitajska;
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd., Changxing, PRC.
Zhejiang Noblelift Equipment Joint Stock Co. Ltd., Changxing, Ljudska republika Kitajska.
The investigation period of this reinvestigation (‘reinvestigation IP’) ran from 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2006.
Obdobje te ponovne preiskave je trajalo od 1. aprila 2005 do 31. marca 2006.
The reinvestigation IP was used to determine the current level of export prices and the level of the prices delivered to the final customers in the Community.
Med obdobjem ponovne preiskave sta se ugotavljali trenutna raven izvoznih cen in raven cen za končne uporabnike v Skupnosti.
In establishing whether the export prices and the resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community had moved sufficiently, the price levels charged during the reinvestigation IP were compared to those charged during the original investigation period (‘original IP’) which had covered the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004.
Z namenom ugotoviti, ali so se izvozne cene in cene pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vse nadaljnje prodajne cene v Skupnosti dovolj gibale, so se primerjale ravni cen, zaračunanih v obdobju ponovne preiskave, ter cen, zaračunanih v obdobju prvotne preiskave, ki je trajalo od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004.
The product concerned by the present reinvestigation is the same as in the original investigation, i.e. hand pallet trucks, not self propelled, used for the handling of materials normally placed on pallets, and their essential parts, i.e. chassis and hydraulics, originating in the PRC (‘the product concerned’), normally classified within CN codes ex84279000 and ex84312000.
Zadevni izdelek v tej ponovni preiskavi je enak kot v prvotni preiskavi, tj. ročni vozički za premeščanje palet brez lastnega pogona, s katerimi se običajno prevažajo materiali na paletah, in njihovi osnovni deli, tj. šasije in hidravlike, s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („zadevni izdelek“), ki so trenutno uvrščeni pod oznaki KN ex84279000 in ex84312000.
The purpose of this reinvestigation was to establish whether or not since the imposition of the original measures (i) export prices had decreased or (ii) there had been no or insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community of the product concerned.
Namen te ponovne preiskave je bil ugotoviti, ali so se od uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov (i) izvozne cene znižale ali (ii) se cene pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vse nadaljnje prodajne cene zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti niso gibale ali pa se niso dovolj gibale.
In accordance with Article 12 of the basic Regulation, importers/users and exporters/producers were provided with an opportunity to submit evidence to justify a decrease in export prices and/or lack of movement in resale prices and subsequent selling prices in the Community, if any, following the imposition of the original measures for reasons other than absorption of the anti-dumping duty.
V skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe je bila uvoznikom/uporabnikom in izvoznikom/proizvajalcem dana možnost, da predložijo dokaze, ki bi upravičili morebitno znižanje izvoznih cen in/ali premajhno gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji in vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen v Skupnosti po uvedbi prvotnih ukrepov, in sicer zaradi drugih razlogov kot je absorpcija protidampinške dajatve.
In the reinvestigation IP sales of the product concerned were made both via related parties in the Community and in the PRC and directly to independent importers and/or distributors in the Community.
Zadevni izdelek se je v obdobju ponovne preiskave prodajal prek povezanih strank v Skupnosti in Ljudski republiki Kitajski in neposredno neodvisnim uvoznikom in/ali distributerjem v Skupnosti.
Movements in export prices were assessed by comparing, per product type and for the same delivery conditions, the weighted average price observed in the reinvestigation IP with that determined during the original IP.
Gibanja izvoznih cen so bila glede na vrsto izdelka in ob enakih dobavnih pogojih ocenjena s primerjanjem tehtane povprečne cene iz obdobja ponovne preiskave in cene iz obdobja prvotne preiskave.
The comparison of prices of the two co-operating exporting producers in the reinvestigation IP with those in the original IP showed no decrease in the average export price of the product concerned.
Primerjava cen obeh sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov iz obdobja ponovne preiskave s cenami iz obdobja prvotne preiskave ni pokazala nobenega znižanja povprečne izvozne cene zadevnega izdelka.
Movement of resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community
Gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen v Skupnosti
The movement of resale prices in the Community at the level of importers and/or distributors was assessed by comparing, for similar product types, the average resale prices for the same delivery conditions, including the conventional duty plus the anti-dumping duty, of the original IP with those determined in the reinvestigation IP.
Za ocenitev gibanja cen v Skupnosti na ravni uvoznikov in/ali distributerjev se je primerjala povprečna cena pri nadaljnji prodaji, vključno s konvencionalno dajatvijo ter protidampinško dajatvijo, iz obdobja prvotne preiskave s tisto iz obdobja ponovne preiskave za podobne vrste izdelkov in pod enakimi dobavnimi pogoji.
In this respect, five importers, accounting for a significant amount of imports of the product concerned into the Community during the reinvestigation IP, co-operated and provided data.
Pri tem je sodelovalo in podatke predložilo pet uvoznikov, odgovornih za velik delež uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost med obdobjem ponovne preiskave.
The comparison of their resale prices for these product types showed that prices had increased by amounts exceeding the anti-dumping duty.
Primerjava njihovih cen pri nadaljnji prodaji za te vrste izdelkov je pokazala, da so se cene povečale za zneske, ki presegajo protidampinško dajatev.
In this context, it is further noted that it was therefore not necessary to investigate in greater detail any decrease in profit margins of the co-operating importers during the reinvestigation IP compared to the original IP, which in any event remained substantial during the reinvestigation IP.
V tem okviru je treba opomniti, da ni bila potrebna podrobnejša preiskava kakršnega koli znižanja stopnje dobička sodelujočih uvoznikov med obdobjem ponovne preiskave v primerjavi z obdobjem prvotne preiskave, ki je med obdobjem ponovne preiskave bila precejšnja.
Representative data with regard to subsequent selling prices were not available.
Reprezentativni podatki za vse nadaljnje prodajne cene niso bili na razpolago.
However, given that resale prices of importers to unrelated customers were found to have shown sufficient movement since the imposition of anti-dumping measures, it was not unreasonable to conclude that the subsequent selling prices of these customers would also have shown sufficient movement.
Vendar pa glede na to, da so se cene uvoznikov za nepovezane stranke pri nadaljnji prodaji po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov dovolj gibale, ni nesmiselno sklepati, da so se dovolj gibale tudi vse nadaljnje prodajne cene teh strank.
Non co-operating companies
Nesodelujoča podjetja
Since the two co-operating exporting producers in the present reinvestigation exported in volume over 85 % of the product concerned to the Community during the reinvestigation IP, thus constituting high co-operation, their findings were considered to be representative for the exporting country as a whole.
Sodelujoča proizvajalca izvoznika v tej ponovni preiskavi sta med obdobjem ponovne preiskave v Skupnost izvozila več kot 85 % zadevnega izdelka, kar kaže na visoko stopnjo sodelovanja, zato se njune ugotovitve štejejo za reprezentativne za državo izvoznico kot celoto.
Therefore, no recourse to facts available in the meaning of Article 18 of the basic Regulation concerning non co-operating exporting producers was made.
Zaradi tega niso bila upoštevana razpoložljiva dejstva v smislu člena 18 osnovne uredbe v zvezi z nesodelujočimi proizvajalci izvozniki.
It was concluded as the result of the present reinvestigation that absorption in the meaning of Article 12(2) of the basic Regulation of the measures in place could not be established for the co-operating exporting producers, since neither a decrease in export prices nor an insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices for the product concerned was found.
Kot izid te ponovne preiskave je bilo ugotovljeno, da za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike ni mogoče določiti absorpcije sprejetih ukrepov v smislu člena 12(2) osnovne uredbe, saj za zadevni izdelek ni bilo ugotovljeno niti znižanje izvoznih cen niti zadostno gibanje cen pri nadaljnji prodaji ali vseh nadaljnjih prodajnih cen.
The duty for the non-cooperating exporting producers should be left unchanged as well for the reasons set out in recital (18) above.
Dajatev za nesodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike prav tako ostane enaka zaradi razlogov iz uvodne izjave (18).
Consequently, the present absorption reinvestigation should be terminated.
Zato je treba to ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev zaključiti.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations upon which it was intended to terminate this reinvestigation, and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in premislekih, na podlagi katerih je bil načrtovan zaključek te preiskave, in jim je bila dana možnost, da predložijo svoje pripombe.
No substantive comments where received,
Nobena bistvena pripomba ni bila predložena –
The reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People's Republic of China is hereby terminated.
Ponovna preiskava v skladu s členom 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 o protidampinških ukrepih za uvoz ročnih vozičkov za premeščanje palet in njihovih osnovnih delov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se s tem sklepom zaključi.
OJ L 189, 21.7.2005, p. 1.
UL L 189, 21.7.2005, str. 1.
OJ C 78, 31.3.2006, p. 24.
UL C 78, 31.3.2006, str. 24.
of 4 December 2006
z dne 4. decembra 2006