natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(emphasis added) However, after the capital increase, the factor was no longer taken into consideration and the credit rating was based clearly on France Télécom's financial data.
‘the financial risk of the highly leveraged FT is not commensurate with investment grade (compensated by strong operational performance/implicit support of French government)’.) (podčrtano je dodano) Torej po zvišanju kapitala ta element ni več upoštevan in ocena očitno temelji na finančnih podatkih podjetja FT.
For example, on 14 May 2003 S & P wrote: ‘On May 14, 2003, S & P raised its long and short term corporate credit ratings on … FT to BBB from BBB- ….
Na primer, agencija S & P je 14. maja 2003 napisala ‘On May 14, 2003, S & P raise its long and short term corporate credit ratings on […] FT to BBB from BBB- […].
The action follows FT's recent €15 billion rights issue and S & P review of the new management's business strategy for the group as well as the debt-reduction potential arising from its plan to boost cash flow generation during the next three years’.
The action follows FT’s recent €15 billion rights issue and S & P review of the new management’s business strategy for the group as well as the debt-reduction potential arising from its plan to boost cash flow generation during the next three years’.
OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2.
ULC 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2.
Commission Decision 2001/89/EC of 23 June 1999 conditionally approving aid granted by France to Crédit Foncier de France (OJ L 34, 3.2.2001, p. 36).
Odločba Komisije 2001/89/ES z dne 23. junija 1999 o pogojni odobritvi pomoči, ki jo je dodelila Francija družbi Crédit Foncier de France (UL L 34, 3.2.2001, str. 36).
Bouygues Telecom mentions, on page 25 of its comments of 22.1.2003, a judgment of the Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber, of 9.7.2002, No 1414 FP-P.
Podjetje BT na strani 25 v svojih pripombah z dne 22. januarja 2003 omenja sodbo vrhovnega sodišča, Chambre commerciale, dne 9. julija 2002, sodba št. 1414 FP-P.
Memo from Mr Sureau dated 14.1.2004.
Ocena g. Sureauja z dne 14. januarja 2004.
The author of which wishes that his identity be kept confidential.
Avtor te študije želi ohraniti zaupnost svoje identitete.
Letter dated 22.7.2003 from the Directorate for the Budget, captioned ‘Listing of the implicit or explicit guarantees granted by the State’.
Pismo direkcije za proračun z dne 22. julija 2003, z naslovom „Popis določil za implicitno in eksplicitno jamstvo, ki ga dodeli država“.
Bouygues Telecom also refers, in its comments of 11.4.2003, p. 14, to the recourse to ERAP in order to carry out the support operation and to the various laws concerning it, such as, for example, the law on the modification of its statutes or the granting of an explicit guarantee.
Podjetje BT se v svojih pripombah dne 11. aprila 2003, str. 14, sklicuje tudi na opiranje na ERAP za dobro vodenje postopka podpore in na različne zakone o tem, kot na primer zakon o spremembi statuta ali o dodelitvi eksplicitnega jamstva.
Bouygues Telecom refers to Commission Decision 2000/536/EC of 2 June 1999 concerning state aid granted by Italy to Seleco SpA (OJ L 227, 7.9.2000, p. 24).
Podjetje BT se sklicuje na Odločbo Komisije 2000/536/ES z dne 2. junija 1999 o državni pomoči Italije podjetju Seleco SpA (UL L 227, 7.9.2000, str. 24).
See Committee on Finance, the General Economy and the Plan, record No 26, sitting of 5.12.2002, hearing of Mr Thierry Breton, France Télécom's CEO.
Glej komisijo za finance, Splošno gospodarstvo in Načrt, vključno s št. 26, seja z dne 5. decembra 2002, zaslišanje g. Thierryja Bretona, predsednika podjetje France Télécom.
Commission Decision 2001/723/EC of 18 July 2001 concerning the recapitalisation of the company Alitalia (OJ L 271, 12.10.2001, p. 28).
Odločba Komisije 2001/723/ES z dne 18. julija 2001 o dokapitalizaciji podjetja Alitalia (UL L 271, 12.10.2001, str. 28).
Commission Decision 96/278/EC of 31 January 1996 concerning the recapitalization of the Iberia company (OJ L 104, 27.7.1996, p. 25).
Odločba Komisije 96/278/ES z dne 31. januarja 1996 o dokapitalizaciji podjetja Iberia (UL L 104, 27.7.1996, str. 25).
This figure covers three separate advantages: the increase in France Télécom's rating when resorting to the bond markets; the savings made in the absence of any downgrading of the debt, the latter being dependent on the rating; and the savings made through the choice of timetable.
Ta številka vsebuje tri očitne prednosti: Dvig ocene podjetja FT ob opiranju na trge obveznic, gospodarstvo, izvedeno v odsotnosti znižanja dolga, slednji je priložen oceni, in gospodarstvo, ki je izhajalo iz dejstva o koledarski izbiri.
Commission Decision 98/490/EC of 20 May 1998 concerning aid granted by France to the Crédit Lyonnais group, last paragraph of point 8 (OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28).
Odločba Komisije 98/490/ES z dne 20. maja 1998 o pomočeh, ki jih Francija dodeli skupini Crédit Lyonnais, zadnji odstavek točke 8 (UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str. 28).
‘A few words from the State by way of a reminder that France Télécom's risk is ultimately a “quasi-sovereign” risk ’, La Tribune, 3.2.2003.
„Nekatere državne besede spominjajo na to, da je tveganje podjetja FT v končni fazi ‚pravzaprav državno‘ tveganje “. La Tribune z dne 3. februarja 2003.
Point 17 of the Guidelines.
Točka 17 v smernicah.
Now known as Neuf Télécom.
Od zdaj naprej imenovano Neuf Télécom.
LDCOM refers to a report by Deutsche Bank dated 22.7.2002.
LDCOM se sklicuje na poročilo banke Deutsche Bank z dne 22. julija 2002.
LDCOM refers to the judgment of the International Court of Justice, ICJ Reports (1974) 267.
Podjetje LDCOM se sklicuje na sklep Meddržavnega sodišča, Poročilo Meddržavnega sodišča 1974, str. 267.
Ministry of Finance press release of 12.9.2002.
Sporočilo za javnost Ministrstva za finance z dne 12. septembra 2002.
Rouen Commercial Court, 10.3.1981, Jurisdata 1982-00382, Soc.
Trib. Com.
Jurisclasseur commercial, redressement et liquidation judiciaires 1995, section 3110.
Jurisclasseur commercial, pravna prenova in likvidacija 1995, fascikel 3110.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-99/98 Austria v Commission [2001] ECR I-1101.
Sodba sodišča z dne 15. februarja 2001, zadeva C-99-98, Avstrija proti Komisiji, Priporočilo Rec. str. I-1101.
In this case, the press articles did not have probative force because they emanated neither from the company concerned nor from the Government.
V tem primeru časopisni članki niso imeli dokazilne moči, ker niso izražali zadevnega podjetja in vlade.
Comments from LDCOM dated 23.6.2003, p. 23.
Opažanja podjetja LDCOM z dne 23. junija 2003, str. 23.
LDCOM provides the following definition of ‘spread’: remuneration of a loan on the bond market.
Podjetje LDCOM navaja naslednjo definicijo razmikov: povračilo posojila na trgu obveznic.
It corresponds to the difference between the interest rate paid by an issuer depending on its characteristics and the reference rate (long-term government bonds).
To pomeni razliko med obrestno mero, ki jo plača izdajatelj glede na svoje značilnosti in referenčno obrestno mero (obveznosti države v okviru dolgoročnih posojil).
The level and movement of spreads thus make it possible to visualise the risks which the markets associate with a given issuer.
Stopnja in sprememba razmikov posledično omogočata predvidevanje tveganj, ki jih trgi povezujejo z izdajateljem.
LDCOM observes also that the announcement, in the TOP plan, of the introduction of a ‘mobility’ objective with a view to promoting the movement of staff throughout the civil service may contain aid elements.
Podjetje LDCOM opaža tudi, da obvestilo v načrtu TOP v zvezi z uvedbo naloge „mobilnosti“ z namenom, da bi to pospeševalo učinkovanje na plače zaposlenih v vseh javnih službah, lahko predstavlja elemente pomoči.
LDCOM proposes, among other things: the prohibiting of campaigns to reconquer customers in the voice markets, the placing of a ceiling on marketing spending in the voice and high-speed Internet services markets, and a limiting of the marketing resources placed at the disposal of Wanadoo.
Podjetje LDCOM predlaga predvsem naslednje: prepoved programov za pridobivanje strank na glasovnih trgih, določitev najvišje meje stroškov za trženje glasov in internetnih storitev z veliko hitrostjo, omejitev marketinških sredstev, s katerimi razpolaga podjetje Wanadoo.
LDCOM proposes prohibiting the temporal or price squeeze on unbundling, imposing on Wanadoo an obligation to supply third parties for Internet retailing, increasing the profitability of alternative networks by increasing the prices of incoming interconnection and reserving for competitors the benefit of public subsidies within the framework of the deployment of networks in low-profitability areas.
Podjetje LDCOM predlaga začasno ali tarifno prepoved razlike ločevanja, predlaga pa tudi, da bi za podjetje Wanadoo uvedli obvezo o oskrbi tretjih strank s ponovno prodajo interneta, da bi povečali donosnost alternativnih omrežij z dviganjem tarif medsebojne povezavo in da bi bila konkurenca upravičena do koriščenja javnih subvencij v okviru uvajanja omrežij na področju slabega donosa.
Only comments relating to the control of state aid are reproduced in this Decision.
V tej odločbi so povzeta samo opažanja, povezana z nadzorom državne pomoči.
Decree No 2002-1409 of 2 December 2002 amending Decree No 65-1117 of 17 December 1967 organising ERAP administratively and financially.
„Decret“ št. 2002-1409 z dne 2. decembra 2002, ki spreminja „decret“ št. 65-1117 z dne 17. decembra 1967 o upravni in finančni organizaciji podjetja ERAP.
Article 80 of Law No 2002-1576 of 30 December 2002 rectifying the 2002 Finance Act.
Člen 80 zakona št. 2002-1576 z dne 30. decembra 2002 o dopolnilnem finančnem zakonu za leto 2002.
The first memorandum is a study by Yves Galmot dated 7.6.2004, the second a study by Claus-Dieter Ehlermann dated 1.6.2004, and the third a study by Michel Jeol accompanied by a memorandum from Pierre Kirch dated 11.6.2004.
Prvo obvestilo je študija Yvesa Galmota z dne 7. junija 2004, drugo obvestilo je študija Clausa-Dietera Ehlermanna z dne 1. junija 2004, tretje obvestilo pa je študija Michela Jeola, ki jo spremlja obvestilo Pierra Kircha z dne 11. junija 2004.
The economic report is a report by HSBC dated 2.6.2004.
Gospodarsko poročilo je poročilo banke HSBC z dne 2. junija 2004.
The French authorities mention, among other things, bond issues, credit lines, treasury bills, short-term loans and securitisation and derivatives operations.
Francoske oblasti so predvsem omenile izdajanje obveznic, kreditne linije, komercialne zapise, kratkoročna posojila, izvajanje lastninjenja in predelane proizvode.
From 26.7.2002 until the presentation of the Ambition 2005 plan on 4.12.2002, France Télécom made a EUR 70 million bond issue on 26 July 2002 and issued a fungible tranche of EUR 150 million with the EUR 3,5 billion debenture loan issued in March 2001.
Od 26. julija 2002 do predstavitve načrta Ambition 2005 z dne 4. decembra 2002 je podjetje FT izdalo obveznice v višini 70 milijonov EUR z dne 26. julija 2002, poleg tega pa je izdalo del sredstev v višini 150 milijonov EUR, ki so zamenljiva z izdajanjem obveznic v višini 3,5 milijard EUR v letu 2001.
See paragraph 39.
Glej oznako 39.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-482/99 France v Commission [2002] ECR I-4397.
Sodbe sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002, zadeva C-482/99, Francija proti Komisiji (‘Stardust’), Priporočilo Rec, str. I-4397.
Comments from the French authorities of 29.7.2003, p. 8.
Pripombe francoskih oblasti z dne 29. julija 2003, str. 8.
In their comments of 4.4.2003, the French authorities state that the public shareholder's investment decision dates from 4.12.2002.
V svojih pripombah z dne 4. aprila 2003 francoske oblasti navajajo, da je bila odločitev o vlaganju javnega delničarja sprejeta 4. decembra 2002.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-3871.
Sodba sodišča z dne 12. decembra 2000, zadeva T-296/97, Alitalia proti Komisiji, Priporočilo Rec, str. II-3871.
Commission decision of 18.7.2001, C54/96 and N318/02, ‘Third instalment of aid for the restructuring of Alitalia approved by the Commission on 18 July 2001 and new recapitalisation of €1,4 billion’ ( OJ C 239, 4.10.2002, p. 2).
Odločba Komisije, 18. julij 2001 C54/96 in N318/02. „Tretji del pomoči za prestrukturiranje v korist podjetja Alitalia, ki jo je 18. julija 2001 odobrila Komisija in nova dokapitalizacija v višini 1,4 milijard EUR“ ( UL C 239, 4.10. 2002, str. 2).
French authorities' comments of 29.7.2003, p. 27.
Pripombe francoskih oblasti, 29. julija 2003, str. 27.
See p. 8 of the French authorities' comments of 29.7.2003.
Glej str. 8 pripomb francoskih oblasti, 29. julij 2002.
See p. 9 of the French authorities' comments of 29.7.2003.
Glej str. 9 pripomb francoskih oblasti, 29. julij 2003.
“in the light of market conditions” is in italics in the French authorities ' comments of 29.7.2003, p. 8.
“za določitev tržnih pogojev” je v pripombah francoskih oblasti z dne 29. julija 2003, str. 8 napisano v poševnem tisku.
Ibid. p. 9.
Ibidem, str. 9.
Regulation amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
Uredba, spremenjena s pridružitvenim sporazumom leta 2003.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-358/94 Compagnie nationale Air France v Commission [1996] ECR II-2109.
Sodba sodišča z dne 12. decembra 1996, zadeva T-358/94, Compagnie nationale Air France proti Komisiji, PSES II-2109.
See also Commission Decision 94/662/EC of 27 July 1994 concerning the subscription by CDC Participations to bonds issued by Air France (OJ L 258, 6.10.1994, p. 26).
Glej tudi Odločbo 94/662/ES Komisije z dne 27. julija 1994 o vpisu CZS-udeležbe k izdajam obveznic podjetja Air France (UL L 258, 6.10.1994, str. 26).
The principle of the protection of legitimate expectations is a general principle of Community law laid down in a long line of decisions.
Načelo zakonitega zaupanja je splošno načelo prava Skupnosti, ki je bilo uzakonjeno s stalno sodno prakso.
See, for example, the judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 April 2004 in Joined Cases T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01, T-245/01, T-246/01, T-251/01 and T-252/01 Graphite Electrodes, not yet reported, paragraph 152.
Glej predvsem sodbo Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 2004, združene zadeve T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01, T-245/01, T-246/01, T-251/01 in T-252/01, Electrodes de graphite, še neobjavljeno, točka 152.
See also the judgments of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2003 in Cases T-220/00 Cheil Jedang Corp. v Commission, not yet reported, paragraph 33, T-223/00 Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd v Commission, not yet reported, paragraph 38 and T-224/00 Archer Daniels Midland Company v Commission, not yet reported, paragraph 62.
Glej tudi sodbe Sodišča z dne 9. julija 2003 pri zadevah T-220/00, Cheil Jedang Corp. proti Komisiji, še neobjavljeno, točka 33, T-223/00, Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd proti Komisiji, še neobjavljeno, točka 38 in T-224/00, Archer Daniels Midland Company proti Komisiji, še neobjavljeno, točka 62.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-329/93, C-62/95 and C63/95 Germany v Commission [1996] ECR I-5151, paragraphs 28 and 32.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. oktobra 1996, združene zadeve C-329/93, C-62/95, C63/95, Nemčija proti Komisiji, PSES I-5151, točki 28 in 32.
In the opening decision, the Commission indicated that these declarations might constitute factors which must be taken into account.
V odločitvi o začetku je Komisija označila, da te izjave lahko tvorijo elemente, ki jih je treba upoštevati.
In paragraph 70 of that decision, the Commission made a general statement (unofficial translation from the original French): ‘It should also be added that an announcement made by the State of its intention to commit itself might — provided that that commitment is irrevocable and thereby breeds an expectation and a feeling of confidence on the part of the market as reflected in an increase in France Télécom's share price and in the positive reaction of the rating agencies — already involve the commitment of state resources’.
V točki 70 te odločitve je Komisija oblikovala splošno potrdilo: „Prav tako je treba dodati, da za obveznost državnih sredstev lahko razumemo že obvestilo dela države, da se obveže tako, da bo ta obveza nepreklicna in bo ustvarila vtis pripravljenosti in zaupanja na trgu, kar se odraža s povišanjem vrednosti delnic podjetja FT in s pozitivnim odzivom agencije za ocenjevanje“.
It then drew a parallel between this assertion and the facts as set out in the notification by affirming that ‘... The announcement of the State's commitment coupled with the apparent making available of the amount of the loan lead the Commission to find that the aid might be considered as having been granted even before an agreement between France Télécom and ERAP for the provision of the credit line was signed’, and it pointed out in a footnote that ‘On this point, it will be recalled that in July and more particularly in September 2002 the market had already been reassured by the State's support for France Télécom’ (footnote 40) .
Nato je povezala to potrdilo z omenjenimi dogodki v obvestilu, ob zagotovilu, da „… Zaradi obvestila o obveznosti države, skupaj z očitnim razpolaganjem zneska predplačila, Komisija poudarja, da bi pomoč lahko obravnavali kot dodeljeno še pred podpisom morebitnega dogovora med podjetjem FT in ERAP o razpolaganju kreditne linije“ in poudarila v opombi na koncu strani, da „V tem trenutku je treba spomniti, da je bil od meseca julija 2002 in še posebej od meseca septembra 2002 naprej trg že seznanjen z državno podporo v korist podjetja FT“ (opomba na koncu strani 40).
Thus, when the procedure was opened, the Commission already indicated that its investigation might also cover the events of July and September 2002.
Tako je v obdobju začetka postopka Komisija naznanila, da njena preiskava lahko vključi dogodke od julija in od septembra 2002.
See the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission [1999] ECR I-3671, paragraph 25.
Glej sodbo sodišča z dne 17. junija 1999, zadeva C-75/97, Belgija proti Komisiji. PSES I-03671, točka 25.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 6/64 Costa v E.N.E.L.
Sodba sodišča z dne 15. julija 1964, zadeva 6/64, Costa proti ENEL.
ECR 1141.
PSES 1141.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Joined Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2267.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 13. junija 2000, združene zadeve T-204/97 in T-270/97, EPAC proti Komisiji, PSES II-2267.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-323/82 Intermills v Commission [1984] I-3809, paragraph 31.
Sodba sodišča z dne 14. novembra 1984, zadeva C-323/82, Intermills proti Komisiji, PSES I-3809, točka 31.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-67/94 Ladbroke v Commission [1998] ECR II-1, paragraph 52.
Sodba sodišča z dne 27. januarja 1998, zadeva T-67/94, Ladbroke proti Komisiji, PSES II-1, točka 52.
Above-mentioned judgment in Air France.
Prej omenjena sodba sodišča o podjetju Air France.
See, for example, ‘Moody's now expects that a combination of this facility headroom under the existing EUR 15 billion syndicated facility and the free cash flow will enable debt maturities of EUR 15 billion to be repaid during the next 12 months.’
Glej na primer „Moody's predvideva, da kombinacija med kreditno linijo in tistim kar ostane od sindicirane kreditne linije, v vrednosti 15 milijard EUR, ter razpoložljiv pretok blagajne zdaj omogočajo povračilo dolga 15 milijard EUR, ki ima rok plačila v naslednjih 12 mesecih“.
(Moody ' s, 9.12.2002)
‘Moody’s now expects that a combination of this facility headroom under the existing EUR 15 billion syndicated facility and the free cash flow will enable debt maturities of EUR 15 billion to be repaid during the next 12 months.’) Moody’s, 9. december 2002)
Judgment in Stardust, cited above, paragraph 36.
Zgoraj omenjena sodba sodišča o zadevi „Stardust“, točka 36.
See also the judgments of the Court of Justice in Case C-387/92 Banco Exterior de España [1994] ECR I-877, paragraph 14, and Case C-6/97 Italy v Commission [1998] ECR I-2981, paragraph 16.
Glej tudi sodbe sodišča z dne 15. marca 1994, C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, PSES I-877, točka 14, in z dne 19. maja 1999, C-6/97, Italija/Komisija, PSES I-2981, točka 16.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-200/97 Ecotrade [1998] ECR I-7907, paragraph 43 and judgment of the Court of First Instance in EPAC, cited above, paragraph 80.
Sodba sodišča z dne 1. decembra 1998, zadeva C-200/97, Ecotrade, PSES I-7907, točka 43 in zgoraj omenjena sodba sodišča EPAC, točka 80.
Such as the adoption of the law extending the company objects of ERAP or the adoption of the Amending Finance Act granting ERAP a EUR 10 billion state guarantee.
Kot na primer sprejetje zakona o razširitvi socialnega položaja podjetja ERAP ali sprejetje dopolnilnega finančnega zakona, ki dodeljuje državno jamstvo v višini 10 milijard EUR podjetju ERAP.
ERAP ‘has already made available to France Télécom a shareholder loan which will be consolidated when the company's capital base is strengthened’ (Finance Committee, National Assembly, Record No 28, hearing of Mr Alain Lambert).
Glej ERAP „je že sedaj na razpolago podjetju FT delničarsko posojilo, ki bo potrjeno ob okrepitvi lastnih sredstev podjetja“ (Komisija za finance, Državni zbor, vključno s št. 28, zaslišanje ministra Alaina Lamberta).
See also slide 42 of ‘France Telecom presentation to investors of December 5th, 2002’, where the French state back-up facility is described as being immediately available.
Glej tudi diapozitiv 42 iz „France Telecom presentation to investors of December 5th, 2002“, o kreditni liniji Francije (French state back-up facility), ki je opisana kot razpoložljiva takoj (immediately available).
The market was convinced that the loan was in place.
Trg je bil prepričan, da je bilo predplačilo prisotno.
See, for example, ‘The French State's announcement today that it will immediately grant a €9 billion shareholder loan …’) (S & P, 5.12.2002); The confirmation follows FT's announcements that a EUR 9 billion loan facility has been put in place via ERAP ….)
Glej na primer: „Današnje obvestilo države, da bo takoj dodelila delničarsko posojilo v višini 9 milijard EUR …“ ( ‘The French State’s announcement today that it will immediately grant 9€ shareholder loan …’) (S & P 5. decembra 2002); „To potrdilo sledi objavi podjetja FT, da je bila kreditna linija v višini 9 milijard EUR vzpostavljena“ ( ‘the confirmation follows FT’s announcements that EUR9 billion loan facility has been put in place via ERAP …’.)
According to the French authorities, the draft was sent to France Télécom on 20 December.
V skladu s francosko vlado se ta projekt naslovi na podjetje FT 20. decembra.
The draft, however, is undated.
Zato projekt ni označen z nobenim datumom.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 730/79 Philip Morris [1980] ECR 2671, paragraph 11.
Sodba sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980, zadeva 730/79, Philip Morris, PSES 2671, točka 11.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-310/99 Italy v Commission [2002] ECR I-2289.
Sodba sodišča z dne 7. marca 2002, zadeva C-310/99, Italija proti Komisiji, PSES I-2289.
For example, France Télécom has set up a joint venture with Deutsche Telekom and Enel in Italy.
Podjetje FT je na primer v Italiji ustanovilo skupno podjetje s podjetjema Deutsche Telekom in Enel.
The importance of declarations by the public authorities for purposes of applying Community law is generally recognised.
Pomembnost izjav javnih oblasti o namenih uporabe prava Skupnosti je splošno priznana.