natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the United Kingdom market cannot be isolated from the overall Community market and European Community consumption increased by 21,7 % between 2000 and 2003, and by 12,2 % between 2002 and 2003.
Vendar trg Združenega kraljestva ne more biti izoliran od skupnega trga Skupnosti, poraba Evropske skupnosti pa se je med leti 2000 in 2003 povečala za 21,7 % ter med letoma 2002 in 2003 za 12,2 %.
Therefore, the primary reason for the Community producers’ substantial losses in 2003 is the low prices rather than an alleged fall in consumption.
Tako so glavni razlog za velike izgube proizvajalcev Skupnosti v letu 2003 nizke cene, ne pa domneven padec porabe.
Exports (in tonnes)
Izvoz (v tonah)
Exports increased throughout the period considered, and indeed doubled between 2002 and 2003 as, in light of the disastrous situation on the Community market, the Community producers sought to increase their exports.
Izvoz se je povečal v celotnem zadevnem obdobju in se resnično podvojil med letoma 2002 in 2003 ker so, ob upoštevanju pogubne situacije na trgu Skupnosti, proizvajalci Skupnosti poskušali povečati svoj izvoz.
It is therefore concluded, despite a claim by one party to the contrary, that the changes in the level of exports were not a cause of the serious injury suffered by the Community producers.
Zato je sklenjeno, kljub nasprotnim trditvam ene strani, da spremembe ravni izvoza niso razlog resne škode, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti.
In any event, data relating to profitability is based on data relating to Community sales only.
V vsakem primeru podatki, povezani z donosnostjo, temeljijo na podatkih, povezanih le s prodajo v Skupnosti.
Theoretical capacity increased during the period of the investigation by 2,2 % between 2000 and 2003 — by considerably less than production and consumption.
Teoretično se je zmogljivost med preiskovalnim obdobjem povečala za 2,2 % med leti 2000 in 2003 – za veliko manj, kot sta se proizvodnja in poraba.
Therefore, it is concluded that the increase in theoretical capacity did not cause injurious effects to the Community producers.
Tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da povečanje teoretične zmogljivosti ni povzročilo resne škode proizvajalcem Skupnosti.
However, imports increased by 15 % in 2003 whereas the Community producers’ sales in the Community increased by only 5,1 %.
Vendar, ko se je uvoz v letu 2003 povečal za 15 %, se je prodaja proizvajalcev Skupnosti povečala samo za 5,1 %.
Indeed, an examination of the pricing behaviour of all parties in 2002 and 2003 clearly shows that imports were consistently sold at lower prices than those of the Community producers, and that the Community producers’ prices followed those of imports in a downward trend.
Zato je pregled obnašanja cen za vse udeležence v letih 2002 in 2003 pokazal, da je bila cena uvoženega proizvoda bistveno nižja od cene proizvoda proizvajalcev Skupnosti in da so cene proizvajalcev Skupnosti sledile cenam uvoženih proizvodov ter se tako nižale.
Therefore, it is concluded that competition amongst the Community producers was not a cause of the serious injury observed.
Tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da konkurenca med proizvajalci Skupnosti ni bila razlog za resno škodo.
One party argued that higher than normal fish mortality rates in Ireland and disease outbreaks in the United Kingdom and Ireland in 2002 and 2003 could have increased production costs and interrupted the normal production cycle for some producers.
Ena stran je ugovarjala, da večja ko je umrljivost rib na Irskem ter izbruhi bolezni v Združenem kraljestvu in na Irskem v letih 2002 in 2003, bolj bi lahko narasli proizvodni stroški in zmotili normalni proizvodni cikel nekaterih proizvajalcev.
However, these phenomena were limited to a small number of farms.
Vendar pa je bil ta pojav omejen na majhno število ribogojnic.
Therefore, it is concluded that higher than normal fish mortality rates were not the cause of material injurious effects.
Tako je ugotovljeno, da visoka umrljivost rib ni razlog za resno škodo.
Average cost of production (EUR 1000/tonne)
Povprečni strošek proizvodnje (v 1000 eurov/tono)
It was argued that the Norwegian industry has lower production costs than the Community producers and that this, and a failure by the Community producers to reduce production costs, is a reason for increased imports and serious injury.
Dokazovalo se je, da ima norveška industrija nižje proizvodne stroške, kot proizvajalci Skupnosti in da je to, skupaj z neuspehom proizvajalcev Skupnosti, da zmanjšajo stroške proizvodnje, razlog za povečan uvoz in resno škodo.
The information available suggests that whilst Norway enjoys advantages in relation to certain costs, the Community producers enjoy advantages in relation to others.
Informacije, ki so na voljo, kažejo, da ima Norveška ugodnosti pri določenih stroških, proizvajalci Skupnosti pa imajo prednosti pri drugih.
Overall, it is noted that whilst the Community producers are incurring significant losses in the current market, so too are Norwegian producers.
Ugotovi se, da so proizvajalci Skupnosti utrpeli resno škodo, proizvajalci na Norveškem pa tudi.
As noted in section 8.2.12, the Community producers made a loss of – 17,1 % in 2003.
Kot je ugotovljeno v oddelku 8.2.12, so proizvajalci Skupnosti utrpeli škodo v višini – 17,1 % v letu 2003.
Norwegian Government data indicate that in 2003 for a sample of 148 salmon and rainbow trout farms losses were – 12,1 %.
Podatki vlade Norveške prikazujejo, da so v letu 2003 za vzorec 148 ribogojnic lososov in amerikank utrpeli izgubo – 12,1 %.
In addition, the Norwegian producers were operating under a heavy burden of debt, representing a significant proportion of their total costs.
Poleg tega so norveški proizvajalci delovali pod bremenom dolga, kar predstavlja resnično razsežnost skupnih stroškov.
Their total debt (excluding equity and provisions) was 6,3 billion NOK compared to a total turnover of 5,6 billion NOK [9] (equalling around EUR 750 m and EUR 670 m respectively).
Njihov skupni dolg (razen lastniškega kapitala in določb) je bil 6,3 milijard norveških kron v primerjavi s celotnim prihodkom 5,6 milijarde norveških kron [9] (kar ustreza okoli 750 in 670 milijonov eurov).
Therefore, the conclusion is that, whilst there may be small differences, any difference between the Community producers’ average cost of production and that of exporting producers was not a material cause of the serious injury suffered.
Iz tega razloga se ugotovi, da medtem ko obstajajo majhne razlike, nobena razlika med povprečnimi stroški proizvodnje proizvajalcev Skupnosti in proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni bila vzrok za resno škodo.
In this regard, it is noted that fish farming in Norway, which is the Community market leader, is often undertaken in remote locations with relatively poor transport infrastructure.
V tem okviru je ugotovljeno, da gojenje rib na Norveškem, ki je glavni proizvajalec v Skupnosti, pogosto poteka na oddaljenih lokacijah s slabo prometno infrastrukturo.
Overall, there is not considered to be a significant difference in the costs of transport to the Community market as between Norway, the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Pri prevoznih stroških na Norveškem, v Združenem kraljestvu in na Irskem ter pri prevoznih stroških trga Skupnosti ni bilo ugotovljenih večjih odstopanj.
It was argued that stricter environmental and sanitary legislation in the Community, import restrictions in third countries, scientific reports on salmon and negative public relations resulting from press coverage had contributed to the injury suffered by the Community producers.
Dokazovalo se je, da so strožja okoljska in sanitarna zakonodaja v Skupnosti, uvozne omejitve v tretjih državah, znanstvena poročila o lososu in negativni odnosi z javnostjo, ki izhajajo iz kritja tiska, prispevali k škodi, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti.
No evidence was however produced in support of these arguments, nor were the arguments developed.
Vendar pa niso bili predloženi dokazi v podporo teh argumentov, niti se argumenti niso pripravljali.
In these circumstances, these factors cannot be taken as relevant causation factors for the serious injury to the Community producers.
V teh okoliščinah teh dejavnikov ni mogoče upoštevati kot pomembne vzročne dejavnike za resno škodo proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
No other causation factors of possible relevance were identified during the definitive stage of the investigation.
Na končni stopnji raziskave niso bili ugotovljeni nobeni drugi vzročni dejavniki.
No other factors which could have contributed to the injury apart from the increase in low priced imports were identified.
K takšni škodi ni pripomogel noben drug dejavnik, razen nizke uvozne cene.
Therefore, having determined that no material injurious effects resulted from the other known factors, it is concluded that there is a genuine and substantial link between increased low priced imports and serious injury to the Community producers.
Ker je bilo odločeno, da resne škode niso povzročili drugi znani dejavniki, se ugotovi, da obstaja bistvena povezava med nizkimi uvoznimi cenami in resno škodo, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti.
THE SAFEGUARD MEASURES
ZAŠČITNI UKREPI
Analysis of the findings of the investigation confirms that there is serious injury and the need for definitive safeguard measures in order to remedy the serious injury suffered by the Community producers and prevent further injury to the Community producers.
Analiza ugotovitev preiskave potrjuje, da obstaja resna škoda in potreba po dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepih za popravo resne škode, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti in preprečitev nadaljnje škode proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Form and level of definitive safeguard measures
Oblika in raven dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepov
As the main cause of damage to the Community producers is the large volume imports leading to low price and causing price depression and suppression, the measures taken should be designed to remedy the serious injury and facilitate adjustment.
Ker je glavni vzrok za škodo, ki so jo utrpeli proizvajalci Skupnosti, velika količina uvoza, ki vodi k zmanjšanju cen, morajo sprejeti ukrepi popraviti resno škodo in omogočiti prilagoditev.
To achieve these aims, the measures should lead to a temporary stabilisation of prices that does not unnecessarily limit supply and provides for a period during which the Community producers may adjust to future conditions of increased competition from cheap imported products.
Za dosego teh ciljev morajo ukrepi voditi k začasni stabilizaciji cen, ki po nepotrebnem ne omejuje oskrbe in omogoči obdobje, v katerem se lahko proizvajalci Skupnosti prilagodijo prihodnjim pogojem povečane konkurence poceni uvoženih proizvodov.
The provisional safeguard measures took the form of tariff quotas alone.
Začasni zaščitni ukrepi so prevzeli obliko tarifnih kvot.
Even in the period during which the provisional measures were in force, imports of farmed salmon were continuing to enter the Community at prices which were substantially below the cost of production of the Community producers.
Celo v obdobju, ko so veljali začasni ukrepi, je uvoz gojenega lososa še naprej vstopal v Skupnost po cenah, ki so bile bistveno pod stroški proizvodnje proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
Measures should therefore be taken which will have the effect of increasing prices to a level at which there is at least full cost recovery by the Community producers.
Zato je potrebno uvesti ukrepe, ki bodo učinkovali na povečane cene do ravni, na kateri pride vsaj do celotnega povračila stroškov proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
This should facilitate adjustment by ensuring that during the period of the present measures the Community producers do not continue to sustain losses the effect of which would be to prevent them raising finance so as to take the measures necessary for adjustment and restructuring.
To naj bi omogočilo prilagoditev z zagotavljanjem, da v obdobju sedanjih ukrepov proizvajalci Skupnosti ne trpijo več izgub in katerih učinek bi bil preprečiti višanje financiranja, s sprejemom ukrepov, potrebnih za prilagoditev in prestrukturiranje.
In order to achieve an upward impact on prices, it was considered whether tariff quotas should be installed, albeit with very small safeguard tariff-free volumes.
Da bi vplivali na dvigovanje cen, se je preučilo ali bi bilo primerno uvesti tarifne kvote, čeprav z zelo majhnimi zaščitnimi obsegi brez tarif.
However, while this could arguably have been expected to impact on prices, such an approach was considered inappropriate since the growing market for farmed salmon should not be unduly restricted.
Vendar, čeprav bi se prav lahko pričakovalo, da bo to vplivalo na cene, se je takšen pristop štel za neprimernega, ker naraščajoči trg gojenega lososa ne sme biti pretirano omejen.
Therefore, a price element should be established for all imports of farmed salmon to the Community.
Zato je potrebno določiti tarifne kvote za vse uvoze gojenega lososa Skupnosti.
The Community producers’ average cost of production has been found to be EUR 3,10 per kilo in 2003.
Povprečni stroški proizvodnje proizvajalcev Skupnosti so bili 3,10 eura/kg v letu 2003.
However, the Community producers’ product normally commands a price premium over the imported product of up to around 10 %.
Vendar pa proizvod proizvajalcev Skupnosti običajno zapoveduje visoko cenovno premijo uvoženega proizvoda do okoli 10 %.
It is therefore concluded that the import price level should be established at EUR 2850 per tonne for fresh salmon.
Zato je ugotovljeno, da je potrebno določiti uvozno ceno 2850 eurov/tono za sveži losos.
This should permit Community producers, despite the low price element, to sell at around break-even.
To bi moralo proizvajalcem Skupnosti dovoliti, da kljub nizkim tarifnim kvotam prodajajo po ceni, ki pokrije stroške.
It was argued that minimum price undertakings in previous cases had not been respected.
Ugotavljali so, da se minimalne cenovne obveze v prejšnjih primerih niso upoštevale.
Whilst that may be the case, these measures do not involve undertakings but the establishment of an import price level below which duty is payable, and circumvention of which is customs fraud.
Medtem ko lahko do tega pride, ti ukrepi ne vključujejo izvajanja, temveč določitev ravni uvozne cene, pod katero se plača dajatev, in preprečenje le-te je carinska goljufija.
In addition, some parties expressed a preference for a specific or ad valorem duty instead of the establishment of a minimum price for imports.
Poleg tega so nekatere stranke izrazile, da bi raje imele posebne ali ad valorem dajatve, namesto določitve minimalne cene za uvoz.
However, the imposition of such a duty would take money out of the market and it is therefore considered that the establishment of a minimum price for imports represents a better solution in the medium term.
Vendar pa bi uvedba takšne dajatve odvzela denar iz trga in se zato šteje, da določitev minimalne cene za uvoz predstavlja boljšo rešitev za srednjeročno obdobje.
Nevertheless, in order to facilitate the adaptation, it is considered appropriate that during the phasing-in as described below, a specific duty should be applied.
Vendar zaradi olajšanja prilagoditve, se šteje v času uvajanja primerno, da se uvede posebna dajatev, kot je opisano spodaj.
It has been argued that as frozen salmon commands a lower price than fresh salmon because of a slight difference in the structure of the cost of production, applying the same import price level would effectively exclude frozen salmon from the Community market.
Dokazovalo se je, da bi se lahko zamrznjen losos učinkovito izključil iz trga Skupnosti, ker zaradi majhne razlike v strukturi stroškov proizvodnje zapoveduje nižjo ceno kot sveži losos in uporablja enako raven uvozne cene.
On that basis, it is argued that a lower import price level should be established for frozen salmon to take account of these different cost elements and that any price element should be lower for frozen than for fresh salmon.
Na podlagi tega se dokazuje, da bi morala biti določena nižja raven uvozne cene za zamrznjeni losos, da bi se upoštevali ti različni stroškovni elementi in da bi morala biti vsaka tarifna kvota nižja za zamrznjeni kot za sveži losos.
As there appears to be a price difference of around 4 % on the market, it is considered that a lower import price level should be established for frozen salmon which reflects that difference.
Ker se zdi, da obstaja na trgu okrog 44 % razlika v ceni, je razumljivo, da bi morala biti določena nižja raven uvozne cene za zamrznjeni losos, ki odraža to razliko.
The import price level for frozen farmed salmon should therefore be EUR 2736.
Raven uvozne cene za zamrznjen gojen losos bi torej morala biti 2736 eurov.
One party argued that having two price levels would lead to complexity for authorities and increase the likelihood of fraud at the point of entry, but these claims are not practically substantiated given the existence of penalties for customs fraud.
Ena stranka je dokazovala, da bi dve ravni cen vodile k zapletenosti za oblasti in povečale možnost goljufij na vhodni točki, vendar te trditve praktično niso utemeljene zaradi obstoja kazni za carinske goljufije.
On the other hand, it was argued that a different price regime should apply to farmed salmon depending on its intended end use (whether for processing or eventual retail sale).
Na drugi strani so dokazovali, da bi moral režim različne cene veljati za gojen losos, odvisno od njegovega namena končne porabe (za predelavo ali morebitno prodajo na drobno).
This would be much more difficult to control and so, for practical reasons, it was found not to be feasible in the circumstances.
To bi bilo mnogo težje nadzirati in tako je bilo iz praktičnih razlogov ugotovljeno, da v teh okoliščinah ni izvedljivo.
As market prices are currently lower and in order to prevent market disturbances, especially for the processing industry, the price element should be phased-in over a period of time.
Ker so tržne cene trenutno nižje in da bi preprečili tržne motnje, zlasti v predelovalni industriji, bi morali v določenem obdobju uvesti tarifno kvoto.
This will allow the market to gradually adapt to the import price to be established.
To bo omogočilo, da se trg postopoma prilagodi določitvi uvozne cene.
In this respect, it was argued both that a long period was necessary to allow processors to adapt to the price increase, and that a short period should be set given the difficult situation of the Community producers.
Pri tem se je razpravljalo tako o tem, da je dolgo obdobje nujno potrebno, da se predelovalcem omogoči, da se prilagodijo na povečanje cene, kot o tem, da je potrebno določiti kratko obdobje, zaradi težkega položaja proizvajalcev Skupnosti.
It is considered that the phase-in period should be from the date of entry into force of definitive safeguard measures until 15 April 2005, during which period a minimum import price of EUR 2700 per tonne for fresh salmon and EUR 2592 for frozen salmon should apply.
Razume se, da bi moralo uvodno obdobje trajati od datuma začetka veljavnosti dokončnih zaščitnih ukrepov do 15. aprila 2005, v katerem bi morala veljati najmanjša uvozna cena 2700 eurov na tono za svežega lososa in 2592 za zmrznjenega lososa.
It is considered that the price element, during the definitive stage, should take the form of a variable duty.
Razume se, da bi morala tarifna kvota na tej določeni stopnji pridobiti obliko spremenljive dajatve.
If imports are undertaken at a CIF Community border price equal to or above the import price established, no duty would be payable.
Če bi se uvoz izvedel po CIF mejni ceni Skupnosti, enaki ali višji od določene uvozne cene, ne bi bila nobena dajatev plačljiva.
If imports are undertaken at a lower price, the difference between the actual price and the import price established would become payable.
Če je uvoz pripravljen po nižji ceni, bi postala razlika med določeno dejansko in uvozno ceno plačljiva.
This minimum price element shall be applicable at all times, both within the tariff quota as set out below, and when the threshold of the tariff quota is reached.
Ta minimalni cenovni element se vedno uporablja, tako znotraj tarifne kvote, določene spodaj, kot ob dosegu praga tarifne kvote.
In order to ensure that importers respect the price element, it is considered that within a specified time limit, importers should be required to provide satisfactory evidence to the national customs authorities of the actual import price per tonne paid for imports of farmed salmon.
Da bi zagotovili spoštovanje tarifne kvote uvoznikov, se smatra, da bi morali znotraj določene časovne omejitve od uvoznikov zahtevati, da nacionalnim carinskim organom zagotovijo zadovoljiv dokaz o dejanski uvozni ceni na tono, plačani za uvoz gojenega lososa.
In order to ensure that all importers respect the condition to provide satisfactory evidence and do so within the time limit, importers should be required to provide adequate security to the national customs authorities upon the importation of farmed salmon.
Da bi zagotovili, da vsi uvozniki spoštujejo pogoj, da zagotovijo zadovoljiv dokaz in to storijo v časovnem roku, bi se moralo od uvoznikov zahtevati, da zagotovijo primerno varnost nacionalnim carinskim organom ob uvozu gojenega lososa.
Given the level of the proposed price element, both phase-in and definitive, for fresh and frozen farmed salmon, a security of EUR 290 per tonne (WFE) of farmed salmon imported (Group 1 — EUR 320 per tonne, Group 2 — EUR 450 per tonne) is considered to be appropriate.
Glede na raven predlagane tarifne kvote, tako uvodne kot dokončne, se za svež in zamrznjen gojen losos šteje, kot primerna zaščita 290 eurov na tono (WFE) uvoženega zamrznjenega lososa (skupina 1–320 eurov na tono, skupina 2–450 eurov na tono).
It was argued that this level of security is too expensive and burdensome for importers.
Dokazovalo se je, da je raven zaščite za uvoznike predraga in preveliko breme.
However, it is considered that a lower level of security would not achieve its purpose given the difference between current market prices and the import price level to be established.
Vendar pa se šteje, da nižja raven zaščite ne bi dosegla svojega namena zaradi razlike med trenutnimi tržnimi cenami in ravnijo uvozne cene, ki jo je potrebno določiti.
Given the nature of the information to be provided and considerations of administrative convenience, it is considered that the time limit within which to provide satisfactory evidence should be a period of 1 year from the date of acceptance of the relevant customs declaration.
Zaradi narave informacij, ki jih je potrebno zagotoviti in mnenj administrativne ustreznosti, se šteje, da je rok, v katerem je potrebno zagotoviti zadovoljiv dokaz, obdobje enega leta od datuma sprejema ustrezne carinske deklaracije.
The security should be released at the moment that the importer provides satisfactory evidence provided that this is done within the specified time limit.
Zaščita bi morala nastopiti v trenutku, ko uvoznik zagotovi zadovoljive dokaze, pod pogojem, da to stori v določenem časovnem roku.
If an importer fails to provide satisfactory evidence within the time limit, the security should be definitively collected as import duties.
Če uvoznik ne zagotovi zadovoljivega dokaza v določenem časovnem roku, se zaščita dokončno pobere kot uvozna dajatev.
In order to ensure that, beyond the traditional level of imports, the Community producers can operate at a reasonable level of profitability whilst keeping the Community market open and ensuring the availability of supply to meet demand, it is in addition considered appropriate to establish tariff quotas reflecting traditional levels of imports.
Za zagotovitev, da lahko nad tradicionalno ravnijo uvoza, proizvajalci Skupnosti delujejo na razumni ravni donosnosti, medtem ko vzdržujejo odprt trg Skupnosti in zagotavljajo, da dostopnost dobave ustreza povpraševanju, se poleg tega smatra za ustrezno, da se določi tarifne kvote v okviru standardnega uvoza.