natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“),
By Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports into the Community of cotton-type bedlinen falling within CN codes ex63022100 (TARIC codes 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (TARIC code 6302229019), ex63023100 (TARIC code 6302310090) and ex63023290 (TARIC code 6302329019), originating in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 74/2004 uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev na uvoz bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost, ki se uvršča pod oznake KN ex63022100 (oznaki TARIC 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (oznaka TARIC 6302229019), ex63023100 (oznaka TARIC 6302310090) in ex63023290 (oznaka TARIC 6302329019), s poreklom iz Indije.
Given the large number of cooperating parties, a sample of Indian exporting producers was selected and individual duty rates ranging from 4,4 to 10,4 % were imposed on the companies included in the sample, while other cooperating companies not included in the sample were attributed a duty rate of 7,6 %.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih strank je bil izbran vzorec indijskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov in uvedena je bila individualna stopnja dajatve od 4,4 % do 10,4 % za družbe, vključene v vzorec, medtem ko je bila za druge sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec, določena stopnja dajatve 7,6 %.
A duty rate of 10,4 % was imposed on companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation.
Stopnja dajatve 10,4 % je bila uvedena za družbe, ki se niso javile ali niso sodelovale v preiskavi.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 stipulates that where any new exporting producer in India provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that it did not export to the Community the products described in Article 1(1) of that Regulation during the investigation period (1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002) (the first criterion), that it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in India which are subject to the anti-subsidy measures imposed by that Regulation (the second criterion) and that it has actually exported to the Community the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community (the third criterion), then Article 1(3) of that Regulation may be amended by granting the new exporting producer the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 7,6 %.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 določa, da v primeru, če kateri koli nov proizvajalec izvoznik v Indiji predloži Komisiji zadostna dokazila, da v obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002) v Skupnost ni izvozil izdelkov iz člena 1(1) omenjene uredbe („prvi pogoj“); in da ni povezan z nobenim izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Indiji, ki je predmet protisubvencijskih ukrepov, uvedenih z navedeno uredbo („drugi pogoj“); in da je zadevne izdelke dejansko izvažal v Skupnost po obdobju preiskave, na katerem temeljijo ukrepi, ali da je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno obveznost za izvoz znatne količine v Skupnost („tretji pogoj“); se člen 1(3) navedene uredbe lahko spremeni tako, da se za nove proizvajalce izvoznike določi stopnja dajatve, ki velja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso vključene v vzorec, tj. 7,6 %.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004 [3] added 15 companies to the list of Indian exporters/producers listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2143/2004 [3] je bilo dodanih petnajst družb na seznam indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev iz Priloge Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004.
NEW EXPORTERS/PRODUCERS’ REQUESTS
ZAHTEVE NOVIH IZVOZNIKOV/PROIZVAJALCEV
Thirteen Indian companies have applied to be granted the same status (newcomer status) as the companies cooperating in the original investigation not included in the sample.
Trinajst indijskih družb je zaprosilo, da bi jim bil odobren enak status („status novinca“) kot družbam, ki so sodelovale pri prvotni preiskavi, vendar niso bile vključene v vzorec.
Four of the Indian companies requesting newcomer status did not reply to a questionnaire and one did not supply additional information requested after it had submitted an incomplete reply to the questionnaire.
Štiri indijske družbe, ki so zaprosile za status novinca, niso izpolnile vprašalnika, ena pa potem, ko je predložila nepopolno izpolnjen vprašalnik, ni posredovala dodatnih zahtevanih informacij.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether these companies fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004, and their requests had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali so te družbe izpolnile pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 in je bilo treba njihove zahteve zavrniti.
The remaining eight companies replied to the questionnaire which was intended to verify that they complied with the provisions of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Ostalih osem družb je izpolnilo vprašalnik, namenjen preverjanju njihove usklajenosti z določbami člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004.
The evidence provided by five of the abovementioned Indian exporters/producers is considered sufficient to grant them the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and consequently for them to be added to the list of exporters/producers in the Annex (the Annex) to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Pet zgoraj omenjenih indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev je predložilo zadostne dokaze, da se jim odobri stopnja dajatve, ki velja za sodelujoče družbe, ki niso bile vključene v vzorec (tj. 7,6 %), in se jih doda na seznam izvoznikov/proizvajalcev v Prilogi („Priloga“) k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004.
As far as the remaining three Indian exporters/producers are concerned, two exported the product concerned to the Community during the original investigation period (i.e. from 1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002) and one was unable to provide any evidence that it did not export to the Community during the investigation period.
Od ostalih treh indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev sta dva izvažala zadevni izdelek v Skupnost med prvotnim obdobjem preiskave (tj. od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002), eden pa ni mogel predložiti dokazov, da v Skupnost ni izvažal v obdobju preiskave.
Under these circumstances, it was considered that for the three companies referred to above, at least one of the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004, i.e. the first criterion, was not fulfilled.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo ugotovljeno, da tri zgoraj omenjene družbe niso izpolnile vsaj enega pogoja iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004, tj. prvega pogoja.
Therefore, their claims had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba njihove zahteve zavrniti.
Companies for which newcomer status was not granted were informed of the reasons of this decision and given an opportunity to make their views known in writing.
Družbe, ki jim status novinca ni bil odobren, so bile obveščene o razlogih te odločitve in jim je bila dana možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoje mnenje.
All arguments and submissions made by interested parties were analysed and duly taken into account where warranted,
Vse utemeljitve in predlogi zainteresiranih strank so bili proučeni in so se upoštevali, če so bili upravičeni –
The following companies shall be added to the list of exporters/producers from India listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 74/2004:
Naslednje družbe se dodajo na seznam izvoznikov/proizvajalcev iz Indije v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004 (OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2143/2004 (UL L 370, 17.12.2004, str. 1).
OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p. 1.
UL L 370, 17.12.2004, str. 1.
Council Regulation (EC) No 123/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 123/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 1338/2002 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India and amending Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1338/2002 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije in spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1339/2002 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic anti-dumping Regulation’), and in particular Articles 8 and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), in zlasti členov 8 in 11(3) Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (‘the basic anti-subsidy Regulation’), and in particular Articles 13 and 19 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), in zlasti členov 13 in 19 Uredbe,
Previous investigations and existing measures
Prejšnje preiskave in veljavni ukrepi
On the same day, the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 1339/2002 [4], imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and India (‘the measures’).
Hkrati je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1339/2002 [4] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve pri uvozu sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Indije („ukrepi“).
Within the framework of these proceedings, the Commission, by Decision 2002/611/EC [5] accepted a price undertaking offered by the Indian company, i.e. Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd. (‘the company’).
V okviru teh postopkov je Komisija s Sklepom 2002/611/ES [5] sprejela cenovno zavezo, ki jo je ponudila indijska družba Kokan Synthetics & Chemicals Pvt Ltd („družba“).
In June 2003, the Commission initiated an anti-absorption reinvestigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation, concerning imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the People’s Republic of China (‘PRC’) [6].
Junija 2003 je Komisija začela ponovno preiskavo za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev v skladu s členom 12 osnovne protidampninške uredbe glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [6].
Accordingly, the Commission Decision accepting the undertaking was repealed by Decision 2004/255/EC [7].
V skladu s tem je bil Sklep Komisije o sprejetju zaveze razveljavljen s Sklepom Komisije 2004/255/ES [7].
In February 2004, an anti-absorption investigation concerning imports of the sulphanilic acid originating in the PRC was concluded by Council Regulation (EC) No 236/2004 [8], which increased the rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty for the PRC from 21 % to 33,7 % (‘the anti-absorption investigation’).
Februarja 2004 je bila preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev glede uvoza sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske zaključena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 236/2004 [8], kar je povečalo stopnjo dokončne protidampinške dajatve v Ljudski republiki Kitajski z 21 % na 33,7 % („preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev“).
Request for an interim review
Zahtevek za vmesni pregled
In December 2004, after conclusion of the anti-absorption investigation, the company lodged a request for a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation respectively, limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of the reinstatement of its undertaking.
Decembra 2004 po končani preiskavi za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev, je družba vložila zahtevek za delni vmesni pregled v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in členom 19 osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe, ki je po obsegu omejen na proučitev sprejemljivosti ponovne vzpostavitve njene zaveze.
The company argued that its original wish to withdraw the undertaking followed from the fact that after imposition of measures in 2002, Chinese exporters absorbed the anti-dumping duties imposed, which resulted in a price depression and made the undertaking unworkable.
Družba je trdila, da njena prvotna želja umakniti zavezo izvira iz dejstva, da so po uvedbi ukrepov leta 2002 Kitajski izvozniki absorbirali vse naložene protidampinške dajatve, kar je povzročilo padec cen, zaveza pa je prenehala veljati.
The company also referred to the fact that as a result of the conclusion of the absorption review, the duty level on imports from the PRC was increased, which had allowed market prices to rise.
Družba se je sklicevala tudi na dejstvo, da se je zaradi zaključka pregleda za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev, stopnja dajatve za uvoz iz Ljudske republike Kitajske zvišala, kar je omogočilo rast tržnih cen.
Therefore, the company informed the Commission that it was prepared to offer its undertaking again under the former terms and conditions, which were considered appropriate to eliminate the relevant injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation.
Kljub temu je družba obvestila Komisijo o tem, da je pripravljena ponuditi svojo zavezo še enkrat pod prejšnjimi pogoji, ki so bili primerni za odpravo posebnih škodljivih učinkov dampinga in subvencioniranja.
The company provided sufficient prima facie evidence that No structural changes had occurred in the company since the previous findings that may have an impact on the acceptability and enforceability of an undertaking.
Družba je zagotovila dovolj prima facie dokazov, da od prejšnjih ugotovitev ni bilo strukturnih sprememb v družbi, ki bi lahko vplivale na sprejemljivost in izvršljivost zaveze.
In April 2005, pursuant to a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [9], the Commission initiated a partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of sulphanilic acid originating in India, limited in scope to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking to be offered by the company.
Aprila 2005 je v skladu z obvestilom, objavljenem v Uradnem listu Evropske Unije [9], Komisija začela delni vmesni pregled protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo za uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Indije, ki je po obsegu omejen na proučitev sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudila družba.
The Commission officially advised the representatives of the exporting country, the applicant and the Community industry of the initiation of the partial interim review and gave all parties directly concerned the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing.
Komisija je o začetku delnih vmesnih pregledov uradno obvestila zastopnike države izvoznice, vlagatelja in industrijo Skupnosti ter dala vsem neposredno zadevnim strankam možnost, da pisno izrazijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
The company re-offered formally its original undertaking.
Družba je ponovno uradno ponudila svojo prvotno zavezo.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of examining the re-acceptability of this undertaking.
Komisija je preiskala in preverila vse informacije, za katere je menila, da so nujne za proučitev ponovnega sprejetja te zaveze.
FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION
UGOTOVITVE PREISKAVE
The investigation has shown that No structural changes occurred in the company since the original investigation that may have a negative impact on the acceptability and workability of an undertaking.
Preiskava je pokazala, da od prvotne preiskave v družbi ni bilo strukturnih sprememb, ki bi lahko negativno vplivale na sprejemanje in izvedljivost zaveze.
Furthermore, experience gained during the application of the original undertaking has shown that the company respected the terms of the undertaking and that the undertaking could effectively be monitored by the Commission.
Kasneje so izkušnje, pridobljene med uporabo prvotne zaveze, pokazale, da družba spoštuje pogoje zaveze in da Komisija lahko zavezo učinkovito nadzoruje.
Nonetheless, it should be noted that significant differences were observed in the price of key ingredients in the production of sulphanilic acid since the original investigation, in particular aniline, and its key feedstock, benzene.
Vendar pa je treba omeniti, da so bile opažene pomembne razlike v ceni ključnih sestavin pri proizvajanju sulfanilne kisline od prvotne preiskave naprej, zlasti pri anilinu in njegovih glavni surovini, benzenu.
In view of the above, the applicant agreed to index the minimum price originally offered in order to address the cyclical nature of sulphanilic acid prices in a way which reasonably eliminates the risk of injurious dumping.
Glede na navedeno, se je vložnik strinjal z določitvijo minimalne cene, ki je bila sprva ponujena, zato da se uravna ciklična narava cen sulfanilne kisline, tako da je tveganje škodljivega dampinga smiselno odpravljeno.
In view of the fact that a publicly available and independent database providing reliable international price data exists for benzene but not for aniline and given further the strong correlation between the price of benzene and the price of aniline, the indexation was based on the price of benzene.
Glede na dejstvo, da javna in samostojna baza podatkov, ki zagotavlja zanesljive mednarodne podatke o cenah, obstaja za benzen ne pa za anilin, ter glede na močno povezavo med cenami za benzen in anilin, je usklajevanje temeljilo na cenah benzena.
The Community industry argued that the applicant should not be allowed to choose the form of the measures and in particular to respect a minimum import price only when the prevailing market prices suit the company.
Industrija Skupnosti trdi, da se vložniku ne bi smelo dopustiti izbire pri obliki ukrepov in zlasti pri spoštovanju minimalne uvozne cene samo v primeru, kadar prevladujoče tržne cene družbi ustrezajo.
Indeed, a company should not be allowed to have the form of the measures changed based on the evolution of the market.
Dejansko družbi ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno spreminjati oblike ukrepov na podlagi razvoja trga.
However, due account should be taken of the exceptional circumstances of the case.
Vendar bi bilo treba upoštevati izjemne okoliščine primera.
In this regard, it should be noted that the anti-absorption investigation revealed that the decrease in market prices at the time the company voluntarily withdrew its undertaking was prompted by the absorption of the anti-dumping duty on imports of sulphanilic acid originating in the PRC.
V skladu s tem je treba opomniti, da je preiskava za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev odkrila, da je zmanjšanje tržnih cen v času, ko je družba prostovoljno umaknila svojo zavezo, spodbudilo absorpcijo protidampinške dajatve na uvoz sulfanilne kisline s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske.
Therefore, and in view of the changed circumstances resulting from the outcome of the anti-absorption investigation, the company’s wish to reinstall its undertaking is considered appropriate.
Zaradi tega in glede na spremenjene okoliščine, ki so posledica preiskave za ugotavljanje absorpcije dajatev, se želja družbe, da ponovno vzpostavi svojo zavezo, velja za ustrezno.
The Community industry further claimed that the undertaking offer should be accepted only following a full interim review, since the market evolution which might justify a new undertaking might justify as well a review of the company’s dumping margin.
Industrija Skupnosti je trdila tudi, da se zavezo lahko sprejme samo po popolnem vmesnem pregledu, saj razvoj trga, ki bi lahko upravičil novo zavezo, lahko upraviči tudi pregled stopnje dampinga družbe.
In this regard, it should be noted that the current investigation is limited in scope to the examination of acceptability of an undertaking to be offered by the company and that No request for an interim review with a different scope has been received.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, da je tekoča preiskava po obsegu omejena na proučitev sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo družba ponuja, in da ni bilo nobenega zahtevka za vmesni pregled z drugačnim obsegom.
Therefore, the claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba zahtevek zavrniti.
A user requested that the anti-dumping duty be lowered or, alternatively that the limited availability of purified sulphanilic acid on the Community market be dealt with by introducing a system of quotas.
Uporabnik je zahteval znižanje protidampinške dajatve, ali pa omejitev dostopnosti prečiščene sulfanilne kisline na trgu Skupnosti z uvedbo sistema kvot.
Here again, in view of the limited scope of the current investigation, the claim had to be rejected.
Tudi v tem primeru je bilo treba glede na omejen obseg tekoče preiskave zahtevek zavrniti.
In view of the above, the undertaking was accepted by the Commission in Decision 2006/37/EC [10].
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je bila zaveza sprejeta s Sklepom Komisije 2006/37/ES [10].
Further to enable the Commission effectively to monitor compliance by the company with the undertaking, when the request for release for free circulation is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the duties will be conditional upon the presentation of a commercial invoice containing at least the elements listed in the Annex.
Da bi lahko Komisija še učinkoviteje spremljala, kako družba spoštuje svojo zavezo, je oprostitev dajatev, ko je ustreznemu carinskemu organu predložen zahtevek za sprostitev v prosti promet, odvisna od predložitve trgovskega računa, ki vsebuje vsaj elemente, navedene v Prilogi.
Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate rate of anti-dumping and countervailing duty will instead be payable.
Kadar tak račun ni predložen ali kadar ne ustreza izdelku, predloženemu carinskim organom, se namesto tega plača ustrezna stopnja protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve.
Further to ensure the effective respect of the undertaking, importers should be made aware that any violation of the undertaking may lead to the retrospective application of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty for the relevant transactions.
Zaradi zagotovitve učinkovitega spoštovanja zaveze, je treba opozoriti uvoznike, da vsako nespoštovanje zaveze lahko povzroči naknadno uporabo protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve za ustrezne transakcije.
Therefore, it is necessary to implement legal provisions providing for the incurrence of a customs debt at the level of the appropriate anti-dumping and countervailing duty whenever one or more conditions for the exemption are not respected.
Zato je treba izvesti pravne določbe, ki predvidevajo nastanek carinskega dolga na ustrezni stopnji protidampinške in izravnalne dajatve, kadar koli ni spoštovan eden ali več pogojev za oprostitev.
A customs debt should therefore be incurred whenever the declarant has chosen to release the goods for free circulation, i.e. without collection of anti-dumping and countervailing duty, and one or several conditions of that undertaking are found to have been violated.
Carinski dolg lahko nastane, kadar koli deklarant sprosti blago v prosti promet, tj. ne da bi bili pobrani protidampinška in izravnalna dajatev, in če je bil kršen eden ali več pogojev iz zaveze.