natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
TCCA represents more than 40 % of the users’ total cost of production of products incorporating the product concerned which means that an imposition of a duty would have an impact on their costs of production.
TCCA predstavlja več kot 40 % skupnih stroškov proizvodnje uporabnikov za izdelke, ki zajemajo zadevni izdelek, kar pomeni, da bi uvedba dajatve vplivala na njihove stroške proizvodnje.
However, since the processors do not have only one supplier, any assessment of the impact of the duties needs to be weighted both by the proportion of each supplier in the purchase of raw materials, and by the individual duty imposed on each of these suppliers.
Ker pa predelovalci nimajo samo enega dobavitelja, bi morala biti kakršna koli ocena vpliva dajatev tehtana tako s sorazmernim deležem vsakega dobavitelja pri nakupu surovin kot z individualno dajatvijo, ki jo naloži vsak izmed dobaviteljev.
It is therefore likely that the duties will not affect 40 % of the cost of production but only part of it.
Zato je verjetno, da dajatve ne bodo vplivale na 40 % stroškov proizvodnje, temveč samo na del le-teh.
In any event, given the number of companies in the distribution chain, it is likely that the effect of the duty will be diluted through the distribution chain and that any price increase will at most only be passed partially.
V vsakem primeru pa je glede na število podjetij v distribucijski verigi verjetno, da bo učinek dajatve preko distribucijske verige zvodenel in bo kakršno koli povečanje cene večinoma le delno sprejeto.
In addition, it should be noted that the supply of TCCA to the Community market by non-dumping companies or countries not concerned by theses investigations became less attractive owing to the strong price pressure exerted by the countries concerned.
Poleg tega je treba vedeti, da je postala dobava TCCA na trg Skupnosti nedampinških podjetij ali držav, ki jih te preiskave ne zadevajo, manj privlačna zaradi močnega pritiska na ceno, ki jo uveljavljajo zadevne države.
It is therefore highly likely that, should fair competition be re-established, non-dumping companies will increase their presence on the Community market.
Zato je zelo verjetno, da bodo v primeru ponovne vzpostavitve poštene konkurence nedampinška podjetja povečala svojo prisotnost na trgu Skupnosti.
As the Community industry still has free capacity and given there is also the possibility of sourcing from countries or companies not subject to anti-dumping duty, price increases, if any, are expected to be moderate.
Ker ima industrija Skupnosti še vedno proste zmogljivosti in ker obstaja možnost pridobivanja iz držav ali podjetij, ki niso predmet protidampinške dajatve, se pričakuje, da bodo zvišanja cen, če bo do njih prišlo, blaga.
Moreover, the impact of the duties on the processors should be evaluated on a more global basis.
Vpliv dajatev na predelovalce je treba oceniti na bolj globalni ravni.
Indeed, TCCA also permits the processors to sell more profitable products and to generate profits on other segments.
Dejansko TCCA predelovalcem dovoljuje tudi, da prodajajo bolj donosne izdelke in proizvajajo dobiček na drugih področjih.
Indeed, there are synergies in terms of sales between the product concerned and other products sold by the processors such as other chemicals and/or equipments.
Obstajajo sinergije v smislu prodaje med zadevnim izdelkom in drugimi izdelki, ki jih prodaja predelovalec, kot so druge kemikalije in/ali oprema.
This is why the product concerned has been described by certain processors as a ‘loss leader product’ which although being a low margin product cannot be abandoned since it is an appeal product which must be part of the catalogue.
Zato so določeni predelovalci zadevni izdelek opisali kot „vodilen izdelek na področju izgub“, katerega ni mogoče opustiti, čeprav gre za izdelek z nizko stopnjo dobička, saj je zanimiv in mora biti del kataloga.
It is also interesting to note that processors’ low profits in the TCCA segment have been obtained in spite of imports at hugely dumped prices.
Zanimivo je vedeti tudi, da so bili nizki dobički predelovalcev v segmentu TCCA doseženi kljub uvozu po izredno dampinških cenah.
This casts considerable doubts on the viability of the TCCA segment of the processing industry.
To meče precejšen dvom na sposobnost preživetja segmenta TCCA predelovalne industrije.
However, an imposition of anti-dumping measures, by restoring effective competition, could even help the processors to recover viable margins.
Vendar pa bi uvedba protidampinških ukrepov s ponovno uvedbo učinkovite konkurence lahko celo pomagala predelovalcem, da povrnejo donosne stopnje.
It should indeed be noted that the origin of the product sold by the processors is generally not known by their customers.
Treba je vedeti, da je poreklo izdelka, ki ga prodajajo predelovalci, strankam običajno neznano.
Processors generally purchase the product concerned from several suppliers and sell it at one average price whatever is the origin.
Predelovalci običajno kupujejo zadevni izdelek od različnih dobaviteljev in ga prodajajo po eni povprečni ceni, ne glede na njegovo poreklo.
Therefore, the imposition of any measure will be on the one hand, an opportunity for those processors to revise their prices somewhat upward, and on the other hand, to mix the most appropriate sources of supply so that their resulting average cost allow them to reach better profit levels.
Zato bi bila uvedba kakršnega koli merila na eni strani priložnost za tiste predelovalce, da ponovno rahlo dvignejo svoje cene, in na drugi strani, pomešajo najbolj primerne vire dobave, tako da jim takšni povprečni stroški omogočijo, da dosežejo boljše ravni dobička.
Thus, measures could have some stabilising effect on the downstream market which rapidly developed these last years with a lot of companies now operating and competing to each other.
Ukrepi bi tako lahko imeli stabilizirajoč učinek na trg na koncu prodajne verige, ki se je v teh zadnjih letih hitro razvijal, z veliko podjetji, ki zdaj delujejo in konkurirajo med sabo.
Interest of consumers
Interes potrošnikov
Consumers of TCCA are either public or private swimming pool owners who use the product concerned as a disinfectant.
Potrošniki TCCA so javni ali zasebni lastniki plavalnih bazenov, ki uporabljajo zadevni izdelek kot razkužilo.
According to the specialized press, the annual pool maintenance cost is estimated at around 834 EUR per year, of which 30 % is for chemicals (thus 587 EUR for accessories and 247 EUR for chemical products).
Glede na strokovni tisk se stroški letnega vzdrževanja bazena ocenjujejo na okoli 834 EUR letno, od česar je 30 % za kemikalije (torej 587 EUR za opremo in 247 EUR za kemične izdelke).
TCCA represent only part of these 247 EUR since chemicals are also used for pH regulation, disinfection, algae prevention, and flocculation.
TCCA predstavlja samo del od teh 247 EUR, saj se kemikalije uporabljajo tudi za uravnavanje pH, razkuževanje, preprečevanje pojava rasti alg in flokulacijo.
One processor provided some unsubstantiated information regarding the impact of any measures on final consumer.
En predelovalec je zagotovil nekaj neutemeljenih informacij glede vpliva katerega koli ukrepa na končnega uporabnika.
On the basis of this information, it would appear that a duty of 77 % on the product concerned would involve a cost increase of 2,5 EUR per month for a private swimming pool owner.
Na podlagi teh informacij se zdi, da bi dajatev 77 % na zadevni izdelek vključevala povečanje stroškov za 2,5 EUR mesečno za zasebnega lastnika plavalnega bazena.
As details of this calculation have not been provided, it can reasonably be assumed that this calculation is at most based on the worst case scenario, i.e. a private owner who would use only Chlorine products for disinfecting and who would buy TCCA in a shop being supplied only by the exporters with a duty rate of 77 %.
Ker podrobni podatki tega izračuna niso bili predloženi, je mogoče upravičeno sklepati, da ta izračun večinoma temelji na najslabšem možnem izidu, t.j. zasebni lastnik, ki bi za razkuževanje uporabljal samo izdelke iz klora in ki bi TCCA kupoval v trgovini, v kateri dobavljajo samo izvozniki s stopnjo dajatve 77 %.
It should nevertheless be underlined, that this 2,5 EUR figure is very close to speculation.
Vseeno je treba poudariti, da je ta številka 2,5 EUR le ugibanje.
Moreover, given the actual duty levels proposed and the possibility for importers, processors and retailers to switch from one supplier to another or to mix their sources of supply, it can be assumed that such a 2,5 EUR increase is largely over evaluated.
Glede na dejanske ravni predlagane dajatve in možnosti za uvoznike, predelovalce in prodajalce na drobno, da zamenjajo enega dobavitelja z drugim ali mešajo vire dobave, je mogoče sklepati, da je takšno povečanje za 2,5 EUR zelo precenjeno.
However, given the number of intermediaries from the import of TCCA to the final consumers, it is considered that the impact of any anti-dumping measures on consumers will not be significant.
Vendar pa glede na število posrednikov od uvoza TCCA do končnega potrošnika velja, da vpliv kakršnih koli protidampinških ukrepov na potrošnike ne bo pomemben.
Indeed, the booming of the swimming pool sector gave rise to a large downstream sector amongst which importers/traders, tablets manufacturers, packers, labellers as well as distributors.
Razcvet sektorja plavalnih bazenov je pripeljal do velikega sektorja na koncu prodajne verige, ki vključuje tudi uvoznike/trgovce, proizvajalce tablet, zavijalce, označevalce ter distributerje.
Therefore, assuming that the increase due to the duty would be partially absorbed by each step of the supply chain and eventually not fully passed on to the final consumer, the cost increase would then be less than 2,5 EUR per month.
Ob predvidevanju, da bi se povečanje zaradi dajatve delno odpravilo z vsakim korakom dobavne verige in bi kasneje ne bilo v celoti posredovano končnemu potrošniku, bi bilo povečanje stroškov nižje od 2,5 EUR mesečno.
On the basis of the above, the likely impact on consumers was considered not to constitute a compelling reason against the imposition of provisional measures, as it seems that the consumers will not be unduly affected by the imposition of measures and that a possible negative effect on consumers is unlikely to offset the positive effect of measures on the Community industry.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da možen vpliv na potrošnike ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga proti uvedbi začasnih ukrepov, saj se zdi, da uvedba ukrepov ne bo neugodno učinkovala na potrošnike in da možen negativen učinek na potrošnike verjetno ne bo izravnal pozitivnega učinka ukrepov na industrijo Skupnosti.
On the basis of the above, it is provisionally concluded that there are no compelling reasons not to impose provisional anti-dumping measures.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega se začasno zaključi, da ni tehtnih razlogov proti uvedbi začasnih protidampinških ukrepov.
In view of the provisional conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Community interest, provisional measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Community industry by the dumped imports.
Glede na začasne zaključke, sprejete v zvezi z dampingom, škodo, vzroki škode in interesom Skupnosti, bi bilo treba uvesti začasne ukrepe, da bi preprečili nadaljnjo škodo, ki jo industriji Skupnosti povzroča dampinški uvoz.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of dumped imports, on the sales of the like product in the Community.
Pri izračunu zneska dajatve, potrebnega za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, je bilo upoštevano, da morajo ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočiti, da pokrije stroške proizvodnje in pridobi dobiček pred odbitkom davka, ki bi ga razumno lahko dosegla industrija istega tipa pri prodaji podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti, pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji, t.j. brez dampinškega uvoza.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 10 % of turnover.
Stopnja dobička pred odbitkom davka, ki se je uporabila za ta izračun, je bila 10 % prometa.
As demonstrated by the profit level of the Community industry before the imports concerned into the Community started to significantly increase, this 10 % profit can be considered as very conservative and reasonably expected in the absence of injurious dumping.
Kot se je pokazalo s stopnjo dobička industrije Skupnosti, preden je začel zadevni uvoz v Skupnost znatno naraščati, se lahko ta 10 % dobiček šteje kot zelo konzervativen in se ga v odsotnosti škodljivega dampinga upravičeno pričakuje.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the undercutting calculations, with the average non-injurious price.
Potrebno zvišanje cene je bilo potem določeno na podlagi primerjave tehtane povprečne uvozne cene, kot je bila določena za izračune nelojalnega nižanja cen, s povprečno neškodljivo ceno.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that a provisional anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found, but should not be higher than the injury margin calculated above in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation.
V smislu navedenega velja, da bi morale biti začasne protidampinške dajatve uvedene na ravni ugotovljene stopnje dampinga, a ne bi smele biti višje od stopnje škode, izračunane zgoraj v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of the present investigations.
Individualne protidampinške stopnje dajatev za podjetja, določene v tej uredbi, so bile določene na podlagi ugotovitev tekočih preiskav.
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during these investigations with respect to the cooperating companies.
Zato odražajo stanje, ugotovljeno med temi preiskavami za sodelujoča podjetja.
These duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Te stopnje dajatev (v nasprotju z dajatvijo za celo državo, ki se uporablja za „vsa druga podjetja“) se zato uporabljajo izključno za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz zadevnih držav, ki jih proizvajajo navedena podjetja in tako posebni pravni subjekti.
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from these rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uvoženi izdelki, ki jih proizvaja katero koli drugo podjetje, ki ni posebej navedeno v operativnem delu te uredbe, z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, povezanimi s tistimi, ki so izrecno navedeni, teh stopenj ne morejo koristiti in za njih velja stopnja dajatve, ki se uporablja za „vsa druga podjetja“.
Any claim requesting the application of these individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting-up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission [5] forthwith with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with e.g. that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Vse zahteve za uporabo teh individualnih protidampinških stopenj dajatev za podjetja (npr. po spremembi imena subjekta ali po vzpostavitvi novih proizvodnih ali prodajnih subjektov) se morajo nemudoma nasloviti na Komisijo [5], z vsemi ustreznimi informacijami, zlasti z morebitnimi spremembami dejavnosti podjetja, povezanimi s proizvodnjo, domačo prodajo in prodajo v izvoz, povezano z npr. to spremembo imena ali to spremembo v proizvodnih in prodajnih subjektih.
If appropriate, the Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual duty rates.
Po potrebi bo Uredba ustrezno spremenjena z osvežitvijo seznama podjetij, ki koristijo individualne stopnje dajatev.
Anti-dumping duty rate
Protidampinška stopnja dajatve
In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
Zaradi dobrega delovanja uprave se določi rok, v katerem lahko zainteresirane stranke, ki so se javile v roku, navedenem v obvestilu o začetku postopka, pisno navedejo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purposes of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purpose of any definitive duty,
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da so ugotovitve v zvezi z uvedbo dajatev iz te uredbe začasne in jih je za dokončno določitev dajatev potrebno ponovno preučiti –
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of trichloroisocyanuric acid and preparations thereof, also referred to as ‘symclosene’ under the international non-propriatory name (INN), and falling within CN codes ex29336980 and ex38084020 (TARIC codes 2933698070 and 3808402020), originating in the People's Republic of China and the United States of America.
Uvede se začasna protidampinška dajatev na uvoz triklorizocianurne kisline in njenih pripravkov, njeno mednarodno nezaščiteno ime je tudi „symclosene“ (INN) in je prijavljena pod oznakama KN ex29336980 in ex38084020 (oznaki TARIC 2933698070 in 3808402020), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Združenih držav Amerike.
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Community-frontier price of the products described in paragraph 1 manufactured by the companies listed below shall be as follows:
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve, ki se uporablja za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, za izdelke, opisane v odstavku 1, ki jih proizvajajo spodaj navedena podjetja, je naslednja:
TARIC additional Code
TARIC dodatna oznaka
The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply, unless otherwise specified.
Če ni določeno drugače, se uporabljajo veljavni carinski predpisi.
The release for free circulation in the Community of the product referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provision of a security, equivalent to the amount of the provisional duty.
Sprostitev v prosti promet v Skupnosti izdelka iz odstavka 1 se izvede na podlagi določbe o varščini, ki je enakovredna znesku začasne dajatve.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96, interested parties may request disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which this Regulation was adopted, make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within 30 days of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Brez poseganja v člen 20 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke zahtevajo razkritje osnovnih dejstev in razprav, na podlagi katerih je bila sprejeta ta uredba, pisno podajo svoja stališča in zahtevajo ustno zaslišanje pred Komisijo v roku 30 dni od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of the date of its entry into force.
V skladu s členom 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke podajo pripombe k uporabi te uredbe v roku enega meseca od začetka njene veljave.
OJ C 178, 10.7.2004, p. 2.
UL C 178, 10.7.2004, str. 2.
OJ C 283, 20.11.2004, p. 3.
UL C 283, 20.11.2004, str. 3.
OJ C 253, 13.10.2004, p. 6.
UL C 253, 13.10.2004, str. 6.
Corrigendum OJ C 44, 19.2.2005, p. 30.
Popravek v UL C 44, 19.2.2005, str. 30.
In addition, the two other Community producers provided general information.
Poleg tega sta dva druga proizvajalca Skupnosti predložila splošne informacije.
In addition, one other processor provided a submission.
Dodatno je vlogo predložil še en predelovalec.
The dumping margin for the two co-operating exporters, which were neither granted MET nor IT, was calculated on the basis of the weighted average of the individual dumping margins calculated for each of these two exporters.
Stopnja dampinga za dva sodelujoča izvoznika, katerima ni bil odobren niti MET niti IT, je bila izračunana na podlagi tehtanega povprečja individualnih stopenj dampinga, izračunanih za vsakega od teh dveh izvoznikov.
The latter were calculated by comparing the weighted average normal value established for the analogue country and the weighted average export price reported by the two exporters concerned.
Slednje so bile izračunane s primerjavo tehtanega povprečja normalne vrednosti, določenega za primerljivo državo, in tehtanega povprečja izvozne cene, ki sta ga prijavila zadevna izvoznika.
Clearon Inc.: 69,8 %.
ClearonInc.: 69,8 %
Therefore, the production capacity increased by 30 % between 2000 and the IP-PRC since during the IP-PRC, two factories were, at least partially operating, while during the IP-US, only the new factory produced.
Tako je proizvodna zmogljivost Skupnosti med letom 2000 in OP-LRK narasla za 30 %, kajti v OP-LRK sta dve tovarni vsaj delno delovali, medtem ko je v OP-ZDA proizvajala samo nova tovarna.
The new factory allowed to set the production capacity at a higher level to meet the increasing demand on the Community market.
Nova tovarna je omogočila postavitev proizvodne zmogljivosti na višjo raven, da zadosti povečanim potrebam na trgu Skupnosti.
Countries concerned unit price in EUR/kg
Cena enote zadevnih držav v EUR/kg
On this basis a non-injurious price was calculated for the Community industry of the like product.
Na tej podlagi je bila izračunana neškodljiva cena za industrijo Skupnosti podobnega izdelka.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adding the above mentioned profit margin of 10 % to the cost of production.
Neškodljiva cena je bila izračunana s prištetjem zgoraj navedene 10 % stopnje dobička stroškom proizvodnje.
Zhucheng Taisheng Chemical Co.
Zhucheng Taisheng Chemical Co. Limited
It should first be noted that DEF is indirectly controlled by the State. Secondly, whereas behind each of the observations mentioned in the previous recital, there may be reasons that could be commercially explained, this does not contradict the conclusion that company 2 is closely linked to DEF. Indeed, the main argument against granting MET under this criterion are not the links themselves, but that company 2 has such links with a company which is de facto state-controlled.
Najprej je treba vedeti, da država posredno nadzira DEF. Drugič, medtem ko za vsako izmed ugotovitev, navedenih v prejšnji uvodni izjavi, obstaja verjetnost, da se jo lahko komercialno pojasni, to ni v nasprotju z ugotovitvijo, da je podjetje 2 tesno povezano z DEF. Glavna utemeljitev proti odobritvi MET po teh merilih niso vezi same, temveč dejstvo, da ima podjetje 2 takšne vezi s podjetjem, ki ga dejansko nadzira država.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 539/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 539/2005
to the Commission Regulation of 7 April 2005 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 7. aprila 2005 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za žita, pšenično in rženo moko, drobljenec in zdrob
Commission Regulation (EC) No 540/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 540/2005