natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They argued that any price increase would put them in a non-competitive position vis-à-vis producers outside the Community which would not be subject to an anti-dumping duty on PTFE.
Dokazovali so, da bi jih vsako zvišanje cen postavilo v nekonkurenčni položaj v primerjavi s proizvajalci zunaj Skupnosti, za katere ne bi veljale protidampinške dajatve za PTFE.
The cooperating users did not submit any information with regard to the proportion of the imported PTFE in their total cost of production.
Sodelujoči odjemalci niso predložili nobenih podatkov glede deleža uvoženega PTFE v njihovih skupnih proizvodnih stroških.
Thus, it was not possible to calculate any potential impact of an anti-dumping duty for these users.
Zato za te uporabnike ni bilo mogoče izračunati možnega vpliva protidampinških dajatev.
In any case, it is noted that granular PTFE constitutes a rather low proportion of the overall cost in sectors such as the chemical industry, domestic and leisure, electrical industry or mechanical and automotive engineering, as PTFE is commonly used in the form of miniature components.
Vsekakor se opozarja, da PTFE v obliki granul predstavlja dokaj nizek delež skupnih stroškov v sektorjih, kot so kemična industrija, industrija izdelkov za dom in prosti čas, elektroindustrija ali strojna in avtomobilska tehnologija, saj se PTFE navadno uporablja v obliki miniaturnih sestavin.
PTFE is also used in very small quantities in consumer applications, i.e. an anorak would contain around 20 grams of PTFE inlays.
PTFE se v zelo majhnih količinah uporablja tudi pri izdelkih za končne potrošnike, anorak na primer vsebuje približno 20 gramov PTFE.
On this basis it was provisionally concluded that the financial impact for final users shall be considered as negligible.
Na podlagi tega se je začasno sklenilo, da je finančni vpliv za končne uporabnike zanemarljiv.
It was also noted that, on the basis of the information submitted by these users, their profitability was substantial during the IP.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih predložili ti uporabniki, je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da je bila njihova donosnost v OP velika.
On this basis, it was provisionally concluded that the impact of any anti-dumping duties would be negligible.
Na podlagi tega se je začasno sklenilo, da bo vpliv protidampinških dajatev zanemarljiv.
Finally, the downstream industry claimed that the Community industry did not have sufficient capacity to meet the Community market demand of PTFE.
Industrija na koncu proizvodnega procesa je trdila, da industrija Skupnosti nima dovolj zmogljivosti, da bi zadostila povpraševanju trga Skupnosti po PTFE.
It should be noted that measures are not intended to prevent imports into the Community but to ensure that they are not made at injuriously dumped prices.
Treba je opozoriti, da namen ukrepov ni preprečitev uvoza v Skupnost temveč zagotovitev, da se uvoz ne izvaja po škodljivih dampinških cenah.
Furthermore, as mentioned in recital 147, the impact of the anti-dumping duty on the users’ industry is expected to be negligible and therefore, will not necessarily prevent the final users to source PTFE from the same suppliers even at a higher price.
Poleg tega je treba, kot je bilo omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 147, učinek protidampinške dajatve na industrijo uporabnikov šteti kot zanemarljiv, tako da ni nujno preprečil, da končni uporabniki ne bi še naprej nabavljali PTFE pri istih dobavitelj tudi po višji ceni.
It should also be noted that Community consumption dropped from 2001 to 2002 by 12 % and then remained practically stable until the IP with a small growth of 3 % since 2002.
Opozoriti je tudi treba, da je poraba Skupnosti od leta 2001 do leta 2002 padla za 12 % nato pa ostala na tako rekoč ustaljeni ravni do OP, po letu 2002 pa rast znaša 3 %.
It should also be pointed out that the Community producers still have unused production capacity.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da imajo proizvajalci Skupnosti še vedno neizkoriščene proizvodne zmogljivosti.
This together with exports from other third countries provides alternative sources of supply for the downstream industry.
To skupaj z izvozom iz drugih tretjih držav zagotavlja alternativne vire dobave za industrijo na koncu proizvodnega procesa.
It is therefore unlikely that anti-dumping measures would lead to a shortage of supply.
Zato ni neverjetno, da bi protidampinški ukrepi povzročili pomanjkanje zalog.
Interest of raw material suppliers in the Community
Interes dobaviteljev surovin v skupnosti
The Commission sent questionnaires to all known Community suppliers of the main raw materials (including Chlorodifluormethane (R22) and Anhydrous Hydrofluoric Acid) to the Community industry.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike vsem znanim dobaviteljem Skupnosti, ki industriji Skupnosti dobavljajo glavne surovine (vključno s klordifluormetanom (R22) in anhidridno flourovodikovo kislino).
The cooperation was very high as five replies were received, of which three suppliers are related to each other.
Sodelovanje je bilo veliko, saj je odgovore poslalo pet dobaviteljev, od katerih so bili trije med sabo povezani.
The majority of these suppliers worked closely with the Community industry and other producers of granular PTFE located in the Community.
Večina teh dobaviteljev je tesno sodelovala z industrijo Skupnosti in drugimi proizvajalci PTFE v obliki granul, ki imajo sedež v Skupnosti.
A large part of their turnover (75 %) was derived from sales made to granular PTFE producers.
Velik del njihovega prihodka (75 %) je izhajal iz prodaje proizvajalcem PTFE v obliki granul.
Therefore any reduction in the Community industry’s purchases would have a significant effect on the situation of these companies, which together employed 176 people directly dedicated to the production of the raw material concerned.
Zato bi vsako zmanjšanje nabave v industriji Skupnosti znatno vplivalo na položaj teh podjetij, ki skupaj zaposlujejo 176 ljudi, ki se neposredno ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo zadevne surovine.
Another supplier stated that, without the imposition of measures, there would be a risk of migration of the Community PTFE production to third countries outside the Community.
Neki drugi dobavitelj je izjavil, da brez uvedbe ukrepov obstaja nevarnost selitve proizvodnje Skupnosti PTFE v tretje države zunaj Skupnosti.
This company claimed that, as a consequence, the raw material suppliers would be forced to search for clients outside the Community, in third markets where they would be in competition with the traditional indigenous raw material suppliers.
To podjetje je trdilo, da bi bili dobavitelji surovin posledično prisiljeni iskati odjemalce zunaj Skupnosti na tretjih trgih, kjer bi konkurirali tradicionalnim avtohtonim dobaviteljem surovin.
Exports of raw material would, moreover, invoke additional costs which would erode the already low margins of the upstream industry.
Izvoz surovin bi poleg tega povzročil dodatne stroške, ki bi znižali že tako nizke marže industrije na začetku proizvodnega procesa.
It was therefore provisionally concluded that the imposition of anti-dumping is in the interest of upstream industries.
Zato je bilo začasno sklenjeno, da je uvedba protidampinških ukrepov v interesu industrije na začetku proizvodnega procesa.
Conclusion on Community interest
Sklepna ugotovitev o interesu skupnosti
On the basis of the above, it is provisionally concluded that no compelling reasons exist for not imposing measures and that the application of measures would be in the interest of the Community.
Na podlagi zgornjega se začasno sklene, da ne obstajajo nujni razlogi za to, da se ukrepi ne bi uvedli, in da bi bila uporaba ukrepov v interesu Skupnosti.
Injury elimination level
Raven odpravljanja škode
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury and Community interest, provisional measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused by the dumped imports.
Glede na sklepe v zvezi z dampingom, škodo in interesom Skupnosti bi bilo treba sprejeti začasne ukrepe, da bi preprečili nadaljnjo škodo zaradi dampinškega uvoza.
For the purpose of determining the level of these duties, account was taken of the dumping margins found and the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury sustained by the Community industry.
Za določitev stopnje teh dajatev so bile upoštevane ugotovljene stopnje dampinga in višina dajatve, potrebne za odpravo škode, ki jo je utrpela industrija Skupnosti.
When calculating the amount of duty necessary to remove the effects of the injurious dumping, it was considered that any measures should allow the Community industry to cover its costs of production and to obtain overall a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, on the sales of the like product in the Community.
Pri izračunavanju višine dajatve, potrebne za odpravo učinkov škodljivega dampinga, se je upoštevalo, da morajo vsi ukrepi industriji Skupnosti omogočati pokritje proizvodnih stroškov in doseganje dobička pred obdavčitvijo, ki bi ga industrija te vrste in v tem sektorju pod normalnimi konkurenčnimi pogoji lahko dosegla pri prodaji podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti.
The pre-tax profit margin used for this calculation was 9,3 % of turnover which the Community industry realised before the sharp decline of the import prices from the countries concerned in 2001.
Stopnja dobička pred obdavčitvijo, uporabljena za ta izračun, je bila 9,3 % prihodka, ki ga je industrija Skupnosti realizirala pred močnim padcem uvoznih cen iz zadevnih držav v letu 2001.
This was regarded as an appropriate minimum which the Community industry could have expected to obtain in the absence of injurious dumping.
To se je zdel ustrezen minimum, ki bi ga industrija Skupnosti lahko po pričakovanju dosegla v odsotnosti škodljivega dampinga.
The necessary price increase was then determined on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average import price, as established for the price undercutting calculations, with the non-injurious price of products sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Potrebno zvišanje cen je bilo nato določeno na podlagi primerjave med tehtano povprečno uvozno ceno, kakor je bila določena za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen, in neškodljivo ceno izdelkov, ki jih industrija Skupnosti prodaja na trgu Skupnosti.
The non-injurious price has been obtained by adjusting the sales price of the Community producers by the actual profit/loss made during the IP and by adding the abovementioned profit margin.
Neškodljiva cena se je določila z uskladitvijo prodajne cene proizvajalcev Skupnosti za dejanski dobiček/izgubo, ustvarjen/o v OP, in s prištetjem zgoraj omenjene stopnje dobička.
Any difference resulting from this comparison was then expressed as a percentage of the total CIF import value.
Vsaka razlika, izhajajoča iz te primerjave, je bila nato izražena kot odstotek skupne uvozne vrednosti CIF.
As far as Russia is concerned and due to the non-cooperation of Russian exporters as mentioned in recitals 70 to 75, the injury margin was determined on the basis of export figures as recorded in Eurostat.
Kar zadeva Rusijo je bila zaradi nesodelovanja ruskih izvoznikov, omenjenih v uvodnih izjavah 70 do 75, stopnja škode določena na podlagi izvoznih podatkov v evidenci Eurostata.
It is noted that as mentioned in recital 98 above, the cif export price was adjusted taking into consideration the quality difference between the PTFE produced in the Community and that imported from Russia and the PRC.
Kot je omenjeno v zgornji uvodni izjavi 98, je bila izvozna cena CIF usklajena z upoštevanjem razlike v kakovosti PTFE, izdelanega v Skupnosti, in tistega, uvoženega iz Rusije in LRK.
Secondly, since all export sales of PTFE from Russia were made to traders, while the Community industry sold mainly to users, an adjustment was also made for differences in the level of trade.
Ker je bil celoten izvoz iz Rusije prodan trgovcem, medtem ko je industrija Skupnosti prodajala predvsem uporabnikom, je bila poleg tega narejena uskladitev zaradi razlik na ravni trgovine.
In the absence of any other more reliable information, this adjustment was provisionally estimated with 5 % which was considered as a reasonable profit margin of an unrelated importer.
Ker ni bilo zanesljivejših podatkov, je bila ta uskladitev začasno ocenjena na 5 %, kar je veljalo kot primerna stopnja dobička nepovezanega uvoznika.
With regard to China and given that none of the cooperating Chinese producers was granted MES or IT, the provisional single countrywide injury elimination level was calculated as a weighted average of the injury margins of all three cooperating Chinese exporting producers.
Kar zadeva Kitajsko, se je glede na to, da nesodelujočim kitajskim proizvajalcem nista bila odobrena status subjekta tržnega gospodarstva („MET“) ali individualna obravnava („IT“), začasna enotna raven odpravljanja škode za vso državo izračunala kot tehtano povprečje stopenj škode vseh treh sodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev/izvoznikov.
In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 7(2) of the basic Regulation, provisional anti-dumping duties should be imposed in respect of imports originating in Russia and the PRC at the level of the lowest of the dumping and the injury margins, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Na podlagi prej omenjenega se šteje, da je v skladu s členom 7(2) osnovne uredbe treba uvesti začasne protidampinške dajatve za uvoz izdelkov s poreklom iz Rusije in LRK na ravni najnižjih stopenj dampinga in škode v skladu s pravilom nižje dajatve.
The proposed provisional anti-dumping duties are as follows:
Predlagane začasne protidampinške dajatve so:
Exporting country
Država
Injury elimination margin
Raven odpravljanja škode
In the interests of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which the interested parties, which made themselves known within the time limit specified in the notice of initiation, may make their views known in writing and request a hearing.
V interesu dobrega upravljanja je treba določiti obdobje, v katerem lahko zainteresirane stranke, ki se javijo v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku postopka, pisno predložijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
Furthermore, it should be stated that the findings concerning the imposition of duties made for the purposes of this Regulation are provisional and may have to be reconsidered for the purposes of any definitive measures,
Nadalje je treba navesti, da so ugotovitve glede uvedbe dajatev, sprejete za namen te uredbe, začasne in se lahko znova proučijo za katere koli dokončne ukrepe –
A provisional anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on so called granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), containing not more than 3 % of other monomer unit than tetrafluoroethylene, without fillers, in the form of powder or pellets, with the exclusion of micronised materials, and its raw polymer (reactor bead), the latter in wet or dry form, falling within CN code ex39046100 (Taric code 3904610050) and originating in Russia and the People’s Republic of China.
Začasna protidampinška dajatev se uvede za tako imenovani granulirani politetrafluoroetilen (PTFE), ki ne vsebuje več kot 3 % druge monomerne enote razen tetrafluoroetilena, brez polnil, v obliki prahu ali granul, z izjemo mikroniziranih oblik, in njegov surovi polimer („reaktor bead“), v vlažni ali suhi obliki, in ki se uvršča pod oznako KN 39046100 (koda TARIC 3904610050), s poreklom iz Rusije in Ljudske republike Kitajske.
The rate of the provisional anti-dumping duty applicable to the net, free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1, shall be as follows:
Stopnja začasne protidampinške dajatve, veljavne za neto ceno franko meja Skupnosti pred dajatvijo, za izdelke, navedene v odstavku 1, bo:
The release for free circulation in the Community of the product referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the provisions of a security, equivalent to the amount of the provisional duty.
Sprostitev izdelka, navedenega v odstavku 1, v prost promet v Skupnosti, je predmet varščine ki je enaka višini začasne dajatve.
Pursuant to Article 21(4) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the parties concerned may comment on the application of this Regulation within one month of its entry into force.
Na podlagi člena 21(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 zadevne stranke lahko dajo pripombe o uporabi te uredbe v roku enega meseca od začetka njene veljavnosti.
Article 1 of this Regulation shall apply for a period of six months.
Člen 1 te uredbe se uporablja za obdobje šestih mesecev.
OJ C 225, 9.9.2004, p. 18.
UL C 225, 9.9.2004, str. 18.
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., USA,
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., ZDA;
The production capacity slightly increased, by 8 % over the period considered.
Proizvodna zmogljivost se je v obravnavanem obdobju rahlo povečala, in sicer za 8 %.
During the same period, the capacity utilisation of the Community industry remained stable at 80 %.
V istem obdobju je izkoriščenost zmogljivosti industrije Skupnosti ostala stabilna, na ravni 80 %.
Without prejudice to Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96, the interested parties may make their views known in writing and apply to be heard orally by the Commission within one month of the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Brez vpliva na člen 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 lahko zainteresirane stranke pisno predstavijo svoja stališča in zahtevajo, da jih Komisija ustno zasliši v roku enega meseca od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc., USA.
I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Inc., ZDA.
During the year 2001, when the return on investment was significant, the Community industry made big investments, i.e. EUR 8,3 million.
V letu 2001, ko je bila donosnost naložb zelo visoka, so naložbe industrije Skupnosti znašale kar 8,3 milijone eurov.
After 2001, investments decreased sharply and then further decreased from EUR 4,7 million in 2002 to EUR 3,4 million in the IP.
Po letu 2001 se je vlaganje močno zmanjšalo in se nato še zmanjševalo, s 4,7 milijonov eurov v letu 2002 na 3,4 milijone eurov v OP.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 863/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 863/2005
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 [2] lays down the procedure and conditions for the disposal of cereals held by intervention agencies.
Uredba Komisije [2] (EGS) št. 2131/93 določa postopek in pogoje za prodajo žit iz intervencijskih agencij.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 459/2005 [3] opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 130663 tonnes of common wheat held by the Austrian intervention agency.
Uredba Komisije [3] (ES) št. 459/2005 je odprla stalni javni razpis za izvoz 130663 ton navadne pšenice iz zalog avstrijske intervencijske agencije.
Austria has informed the Commission of the intention of its intervention agency to increase by 30000 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export.
Avstrija je obvestila Komisijo, da njena intervencijska agencija namerava za 30000 ton povečati količino, razpisano na javnem razpisu za izvoz.
The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 160663 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania and Switzerland.
Javni razpis zadeva največjo količino 160663 ton navadne pšenice za izvoz v vse tretje države, razen v Albanijo, Bolgarijo, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Lihtenštajn, Romunijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter Švico.
The regions in which the 160663 tonnes of common wheat are stored are listed in Annex I.
Regije, kjer je uskladiščenih 160663 ton navadne pšenice, so navedene v Prilogi I.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 749/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 10).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 749/2005 (UL L 126, 19.5.2005, str. 10).
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 698/2005 (OJ L 114, 4.5.2005, p. 7).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 698/2005 (UL L 114, 4.5.2005, str. 7).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 864/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 864/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 615/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the export of common wheat held by the Slovak intervention agency
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 615/2005 glede količine iz stalnega javnega razpisa za izvoz navadne pšenice iz zalog slovaške intervencijske agencije
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2131/93 [2] lays down the procedure and conditions for the disposal of cereals held by intervention agencies.
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2131/93 [2] določa postopek in pogoje prodaje žit iz intervencijskih agencij.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 615/2005 [3] opened a standing invitation to tender for the export of 65000 tonnes of common wheat held by the Slovak intervention agency.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 615/2005 [3] je odprla stalni javni razpis za izvoz 65000 ton navadne pšenice iz zalog slovaške intervencijske agencije.
Slovakia has informed the Commission of the intention of its intervention agency to increase by 26982 tonnes the quantity put out to tender for export.
Slovaška je obvestila Komisijo, da njena intervencijska agencija namerava za 26982 ton povečati količino, razpisano na javnem razpisu za izvoz.
In view of the market situation, the request made by Slovakia should be granted.
Ob upoštevanju razmer na trgu je treba ugodno odgovoriti na zahtevo Slovaške.
This increase in the quantity put out to tender makes it necessary to alter the quantity stored by region of storage referred to in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 615/2005.
Ob upoštevanju povečanja količine, razpisane na javnem razpisu, je treba spremeniti količine, uskladiščene po regijah iz Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 615/2005.
Regulation (EC) No 615/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 615/2005 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 615/2005 is hereby amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 615/2005 se spremeni:
The invitation to tender shall cover a maximum of 91982 tonnes of common wheat for export to third countries with the exception of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Liechtenstein, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania and Switzerland.
Javni razpis zadeva največjo količino 91982 ton navadne pšenice za izvoz v vse tretje države razen v Albanijo, Bolgarijo, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Lihtenštajn, Romunijo, Srbijo in Črno goro ter Švico.
The regions in which the 91982 tonnes of common wheat are stored are listed in Annex I.
Regije, kjer je uskladiščenih 91982 ton navadne pšenice, so navedene v Prilogi I.
OJ L 103, 22.4.2005, p. 9.
UL L 103, 22.4.2005, str. 9.
Including Kosovo, as defined in UN Security Council Resolution No 1244 of 10 June 1999.’
Vključno s Kosovom, kot določa Resolucija Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2005
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 865/2005
amending Regulation (EC) No 2707/2000 laying down rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards Community aid for supplying milk and certain milk products to pupils in educational establishments
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2707/2000 o pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 v zvezi s pomočjo Skupnosti za oskrbo učencev v izobraževalnih ustanovah z mlekom in nekaterimi mlečnimi proizvodi
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products [1], and in particular Articles 15 and 47, second indent, thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1255/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni organizaciji trga za mleko in mlečne izdelke [1] in zlasti člena 15 in druge alinee člena 47 Uredbe,
Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 fixes the amounts of aid to be granted for supplying milk products to pupils for the period from 1 July 2004 until 30 June 2005.
Člen 14(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1255/1999 določa zneske pomoči, ki se dodelijo za oskrbo učencev z mlečnimi izdelki za obdobje od 1. julija 2004 do 30. junija 2005.