natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66.’
UL L 337, 24.12.1994, str. 66.“
Competent authorities of the Member States:
Pristojni organi držav članic:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 567/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 567/2006
fixing the representative prices and the additional import duties for molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 7 April 2006
o določitvi reprezentativnih cen in dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za melaso v sektorju sladkorja, v uporabi od 7. aprila 2006
Representative prices and additional duties for imports of molasses in the sugar sector applicable from 7 April 2006
Reprezentativne cene in dodatne uvozne dajatve za melaso v sektorju sladkorja, v uporabi od 7. aprila 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 568/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 568/2006
REFUNDS ON WHITE SUGAR AND RAW SUGAR EXPORTED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCESSING APPLICABLE FROM 7 APRIL 2006 [1]NB: The product codes and the ‘A’ series destination codes are set out in Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3846/87 (OJ L 366, 24.12.1987, p. 1), as amended.
NADOMESTILA ZA BELI SLADKOR IN SUROVI SLADKOR, IZVOŽEN BREZ NADALJNJE PREDELAVE 7. APRILA 2006 [1]N.B.: Oznake proizvodov in oznake namembnih krajev serije „A“ so določene v Uredbi Komisije (EGS) št. 3846/87 (UL L 366, 24.12.1987, str. 1), kakor je bila spremenjena.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 569/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 569/2006
fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 23rd partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005
o določitvi najvišjega nadomestila za izvoz belega sladkorja v nekatere tretje države za 23. delni razpis, izdan v okviru stalnega razpisa, predvidenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1138/2005
For the 23rd partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 28,797 EUR/100 kg.
Za 23. delni razpis za beli sladkor, izdan v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1138/2005, se največja višina nadomestila za izvoz v nekatere tretje države določi na 28,797 EUR/100 kg.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 570/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 570/2006
to the Commission Regulation of 6 April 2006 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 6. aprila 2006 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za žita, pšenično in rženo moko, drobljenec in zdrob
Commission Regulation (EC) No 571/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 571/2006
No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 31 March to 6 April 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.
V okviru razpisa za nadomestila za izvoz ječmena, objavljenega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1058/2005, se ne izbere nobene ponudbe, predložene od 31. marca do 6. aprila 2006.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 572/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 572/2006
For tenders notified from 31 March to 6 April 2006, pursuant to the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005, the maximum refund on exportation of common wheat shall be 4,00 EUR/t.
Za ponudbe, predložene od 31. marca do 6. aprila 2006 v okviru natečaja, razpisanega v Uredbi (ES) št. 1059/2005, znaša najvišje nadomestilo za izvoz navadne pšenice 4,00 EUR/t.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 573/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 573/2006
No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 31 March to 6 April 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported sorghum issued in Regulation (EC) No 2094/2005.
V zvezi s ponudbami, prejetimi v obdobju od 31. marca do 6. aprila 2006 za znižanje uvozne dajatve za sirek v okviru natečaja, razpisanega v Uredbi (ES) št. 2094/2005, se ne izbere nobenega ponudnika.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 574/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 574/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 8 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 8. aprila 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 7 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 7. aprila 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 575/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 575/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the number and names of the permanent Scientific Panels of the European Food Safety Authority
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta glede števila in poimenovanja stalnih znanstvenih svetov Evropske agencije za varnost hrane
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety [1], and in particular the second paragraph of Article 28(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane [1], in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 28(4) Uredbe,
The protection of plant health is an essential factor in the security of the food chain, and recent developments entail an increasing number of scientific assessments of plant health risks.
Varovanje zdravja rastlin je bistveni dejavnik varnosti prehranjevalne verige, nedavni dogodki pa imajo za posledico povečevanje števila znanstvenih ocen fitosanitarnih tveganj.
The expertise currently available in the European Food Safety Authority’s Scientific Panel responsible for opinions concerning plant health, plant protection products and their residues allows for scientific assessments in the area of plant health to be carried out on a limited, case-by-case basis only.
Strokovno znanje in izkušnje, s katerimi trenutno razpolaga znanstveni svet Evropske agencije za varnost hrane, ki je odgovoren za mnenja v zvezi z zdravjem rastlin ter fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi in njihovimi ostanki, omogočajo znanstvene ocene na področju zdravja rastlin le na omejenih, posamičnih primerih.
Accordingly, so as to deal with the increasing number of requests for scientific opinions in the area of plant health, the European Food Safety Authority has formally requested the Commission to establish a new permanent Scientific Panel bringing together a wide range of expertise in the various fields relevant to plant health, such as entomology, mycology, virology, bacteriology, botany, agronomy, plant quarantine and epidemiology of plant diseases.
V skladu s tem je zaradi obravnave povečanega števila zahtevkov za znanstveno mnenje v zvezi z zdravjem rastlin Evropska agencija za varnost hrane predložila Komisiji uradno prošnjo za ustanovitev novega stalnega znanstvenega sveta, ki bo združil obširno strokovno znanje in izkušnje na različnih področjih v zvezi z zdravjem rastlin, kot so entomologija, mikologija, virologija, bakteriologija, botanika, agronomija, karantena rastlin in epidemiologija bolezni rastlin.
As a result of the creation of an additional Scientific Panel on plant health, the name of the ‘Panel on plant health, plant protection products and their residues’ must be changed.
Ob upoštevanju ustanovitve dodatnega znanstvenega sveta za zdravje rastlin je treba ime „svet za zdravje rastlin, izdelke za varstvo rastlin in njihove ostanke“ spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002 je zato treba spremeniti.
Article 28(4) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 is amended as follows:
Člen 28(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 se spremeni:
point (c) is replaced by the following:
Točka (c) se nadomesti z:
the Panel on plant protection products and their residues;’
svet za izdelke za varstvo rastlin in njihove ostanke;“
a new point (i) is added as follows:
Doda se naslednja točka (i):
the Panel on plant health.’
svet za zdravje rastlin.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 576/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 576/2006
Point 2 of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 [2] sets out that specific costs for organic, integrated or experimental production, organic plant protection materials, environmental measures, including costs generated by the environmental management of packaging and quality improvement measures, including certified mycelium and plants and seed of the categories ‘basic seed’ and ‘certified seed’ can be considered as optional eligible measures for operational programmes for a maximum of 10 years per action.
Točka 2 Priloge I k Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 1433/2003 [2] določa, da se lahko posebne stroške za organske, integrirane ali poskusne pridelave, materiale za organsko zaščito rastlin, okoljske ukrepe, vključno s stroški okoljskega upravljanja embalaže, in ukrepe za izboljšanje kakovosti, vključno s certificiranim micelijem, rastlinami ter semeni kategorij „osnovno seme“ in „certificirano seme“, šteje za izbirne dejavnosti v okviru operativnih programov, ki so upravičene do subvencije, in sicer za največ 10 let za posamezno dejavnost.
Experience has shown that there has been a high take-up rate of these measures by producer organisations in most Member States.
Izkušnje kažejo, da organizacije proizvajalcev v večini držav članic v veliki meri uporabljajo te ukrepe.
These producer organisations have thus taken full account of environmental and quality concerns in their operational programmes.
Te organizacije proizvajalcev tako pri svojih operativnih programih v celoti upoštevajo vprašanja v zvezi z okoljem in kakovostjo.
It is therefore envisaged to eliminate the current limit of ten years per action for these measures.
Zato naj bi se sedanja časovna omejitev 10 let za posamezno dejavnost v okviru teh ukrepov ukinila.
Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1433/2003 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In point 2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003, the introductory words of the first subparagraph are replaced by the following:
V točki 2 Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 1433/2003 se uvodno besedilo prvega pododstavka nadomesti z naslednjim:
Specific costs for:’
Posebni stroški za:“.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 577/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 577/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 10. aprila 2006.
Export refunds on poultrymeat applicable from 10 April 2006
Izvozna nadomestila za perutninsko meso od 10. aprila 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 578/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 578/2006
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 405/2006 (OJ L 70, 9.3.2006, p. 46).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 405/2006 (UL L 70, 9.3.2006, str. 46).
to the Commission Regulation of 7 April 2006 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 7. aprila 2006 o določitvi reprezentativnih cen v sektorjih perutninskega mesa in jajc ter za jajčni albumin in o spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 1484/95
Commission Regulation (EC) No 579/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 579/2006
on the issue of system B export licences in the fruit and vegetables sector (lemons)
o izdaji izvoznih dovoljenj sistema B za sadje in zelenjavo (limone)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 230/2006 [3] fixes the indicative quantities for which system B export licences may be issued.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 230/2006 [3] določa okvirne količine, za katere se lahko izdajo izvozna dovoljenja sistema B.
In the light of the information available to the Commission today, there is a risk that the indicative quantities laid down for the current export period for lemons will shortly be exceeded.
Glede na informacije, s katerimi danes razpolaga Komisija, obstaja nevarnost, da se okvirne količine, določene za tekoče izvozno obdobje za limone, v kratkem prekoračijo.
To avoid this situation, applications for system B licences for lemons after 7 April 2006 should be rejected until the end of the current export period,
V izogib takšnemu stanju je treba zavrniti zahtevke za dovoljenja sistema B za limone, izvožene po 7. aprilu 2006, do konca tekočega izvoznega obdobja –
Applications for system B export licences for lemons submitted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 230/2006, export declarations for which are accepted after 7 April and before 16 May 2006, are hereby rejected.
Zahtevki za izvozna dovoljenja sistema B za limone, vloženi v skladu s členom 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 230/2006, za katere se odobrijo izvozne deklaracije po 7. aprilu in pred 16. majem 2006, se zavrnejo.
OJ L 39, 10.2.2006, p. 10.
UL L 39, 10.2.2006, str. 10.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 580/2006
These prices and duties were last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 559/2006 [4].
Navedene cene in dolžnosti so bile nazadnje spremenjene z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 559/2006 [4].
OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 71.
UL L 98, 6.4.2006, str. 71.
Amended representative prices and additional duties applicable to imports of white sugar, raw sugar and products covered by CN code 17029099 applicable from 8 April 2006
Spremenjeni zneski reprezentativnih cen in dodatnih uvoznih dajatev za beli sladkor, surovi sladkor in proizvode pod oznako KN 17029099, ki se uporabljajo od 8. aprila 2006
Commission Regulation (EC) No 581/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 581/2006
amending the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 8 April 2006
o spremembah uvoznih dajatev v sektorju žit, v uporabi od 8. aprila 2006
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 558/2006 (OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 68).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 558/2006 (UL L 98, 6.4.2006, str. 68).
Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 8 April 2006
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003, v uporabi od 8. aprila 2006
period from 31.3.2006-6.4.2006
obdobje od 31.3.2006–6.4.2006
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 17,14 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 20,51 EUR/t.
Prevoz/stroški: Mehiški zaliv–Rotterdam: 17,14 EUR/t; Velika jezera–Rotterdam: 20,51 EUR/t.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 582/2006
This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 April 2006.
Ta uredba začne veljati 11. aprila 2006.
to Commission Regulation of 10 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 10. aprila 2006 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 583/2006
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 583/2006
All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 April 2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be granted in full.
Vsakemu zahtevku za uvozno dovoljenje, vloženemu od 1. do 5. aprila 2006, za sveže, hlajeno ali zamrznjeno goveje meso visoke kvalitete, iz člena 2(f) Uredbe (ES) št. 936/97, se v celoti ugodi.
Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first five days of May 2006 for 9416,696 t.
Zahtevki za dovoljenja se lahko vložijo v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 936/97 tekom prvih pet dni maja 2006 za 9416,696 ton.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 408/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 408/2006 (UL L 71, 10.3.2006, str. 3).
Council Regulation (EC) No 584/2006
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 584/2006
amending Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1480/2003 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve in o dokončnem pobiranju začasne dajatve pri uvozu nekaterih elektronskih mikrovezij, poznanih kot DRAM (dinamični bralno-pisalni pomnilnik), s poreklom iz Republike Koreje
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 of 23 July 2001 on the measures that may be taken by the Community following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1515/2001 z dne 23. julija 2001 o ukrepih, ki jih Skupnost lahko uvede na podlagi poročila, ki ga sprejme Organ STO za reševanje sporov v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskimi zadevami [1],
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the basic Regulation),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna uredba“),
By Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 [3] (the definitive Regulation), the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty of 34,8 % on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs) originating in the Republic of Korea and manufactured by all companies other than Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (Samsung), for which a 0 % duty rate was established.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1480/2003 [3] („dokončna uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončno izravnalno dajatev v višini 34,8 % pri uvozu nekaterih elektronskih mikrovezij, znanih kot „DRAM“ (dinamični bralno-pisalni pomnilnik), s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, ki jih proizvajajo vsa podjetja razen podjetja Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd („Samsung“), za katero je bila določena stopnja dajatve 0 %.
The definitive Regulation was preceded by Commission Regulation (EC) No 708/2003 of 23 April 2003 imposing a provisional countervailing duty on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea [4] (provisional Regulation).
Pred dokončno uredbo je bila izdana Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 708/2003 z dne 23. aprila 2003 o uvedbi začasne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz DRAM s poreklom iz Republike Kitajske [4] („začasna uredba“).
Two exporting producers located in the Republic of Korea cooperated in the investigation which led to the imposition of the existing measures (the original investigation): Samsung, which was not found receiving subsidies, and Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (Hynix).
V preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov („prvotna preiskava“), sta sodelovala dva proizvajalca izvoznika iz Republike Kitajske: Samsung, za katerega ni bilo ugotovljeno, da prejema subvencije, in Hynix Semiconductor Inc. („Hynix“).
The European Community (EC) industry in the original investigation consisted of two producers which accounted for the major proportion of the total Community production of DRAMs, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, Germany (Infineon) and Micron Europe Ltd, Crowthorne, United Kingdom (Micron).
Med prvotno preiskavo sta to industrijsko panogo v Evropski skupnosti sestavljala dva proizvajalca, katerih skupna proizvodnja izdelkov je obsegala večji del celotne proizvodnje DRAM-a, in sicer Infineon Technologies AG, München, Nemčija („Infineon“) ter Micron Europe Ltd, Crowthorne, Združeno kraljestvo („Micron“).
The investigation of subsidisation and injury covered the period from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2001 (IP).
Preiskava subvencioniranja in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do 31. decembra 2001 (obdobje preiskave – „OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from 1 January 1998 to the end of the IP (the period under consideration).
Proučitev gibanj, pomembnih za oceno škode, je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 1998 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Report adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO
Poročilo, ki ga je sprejel Organ STO za poravnavo sporov
On 3 August 2005, the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the World Trade Organisation (WTOmm) adopted a Panel report in ‘European Communities — Countervailing measures on dynamic random access memory chips from Korea’ [5].
Dne 3. avgusta 2005 je Organ STO za poravnavo sporov (Dispute Settlement Body – „DSB“) sprejel poročilo preiskovalnega odbora o primeru „Evropski skupnosti – izravnalni ukrepi za čipe za dinamične bralno-pisalne pomnilnike iz Koreje“ [5].
According to the Panel report, the EC acted in a manner inconsistent with its WTO obligations under:
Iz poročila preiskovalnega odbora je razvidno, da ES ni ravnala v skladu z obveznostmi v okviru STO:
Article 1.1(a) of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures [6] (the SCM Agreement) in determining that the May 2001 restructuring programme constituted a financial contribution by the government;
trditev, da program prestrukturiranja iz maja 2001 predstavlja finančni prispevek vlade, ni v skladu s členom 1.1(a) Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih („Sporazum SIU“) [6];
Article 1.1(b) of the SCM Agreement in its determination of the existence of a benefit in the case of the syndicated loan;
trditev, da je v primeru posojila bančnega konzorcija šlo za ugodnost, ni v skladu s členom 1.1(b) Sporazuma SIU;
Articles 1.1(b) and 14 of the SCM Agreement in directly applying, for the purposes of the calculation of the amount of benefit, its grant methodology to all programmes found to constitute a subsidy;
neposredna uporaba metodologije v zvezi s subvencijami, za namene izračuna višine ugodnosti, pri vseh programih, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da se šteje za subvencijo, ni v skladu s členom 1.1(b) in členom 14 Sporazuma SIU;
Article 15.4 of the SCM Agreement by not evaluating the factor ‘wages’ as a relevant factor affecting the state of the domestic industry; and
neupoštevanje dejavnika „mezde“ kot pomembnega dejavnika, ki vpliva na stanje domače industrije, ni v skladu s členom 15.4 Sporazuma SIU; ter
Article 15.5 of the SCM Agreement by failing to make sure that the injury caused by certain other factors (in particular, decline in demand, overcapacity, and other (non-subsidised) imports) was not attributed to the subsidised imports.
neuspešen dokaz, da škoda, ki so jo povzročili nekateri drugi dejavniki (zlasti zmanjšanje povpraševanja, presežna zmogljivost in drugi vrste (nesubvencioniranega) uvoza), ni bila pripisana subvencioniranemu uvozu, ni v skladu s členom 15.5 Sporazuma SIU.
On the other hand, the EC was found to have acted consistently with its WTO obligations under:
Na drugi strani je bilo ugotovljeno, da je ES ravnala v skladu z obveznostmi v okviru STO:
Article 1.1(a) of the SCM Agreement in determining that the syndicated loan, the KEIC guarantee, the KDB debenture programme and the October 2001 restructuring programme constituted a financial contribution by the Government of Korea (GOK);
trditev, da so posojilo bančnega konzorcija, jamstvo KEIC, zadolžniški program KDB in program prestrukturiranja iz oktobra 2001 predstavljali finančni prispevek korejske vlade („KV“), je v skladu s členom 1.1(a) Sporazuma SIU;
Article 1.1(b) of the SCM Agreement in determining that a benefit was conferred on Hynix by the KEIC guarantee, the KDB debenture programme, the May 2001 restructuring programme and the October 2001 restructuring programme;
trditev, da je bila z jamstvom KEIC, zadolžniškim programom KDB, programom prestrukturiranja iz maja 2001 in programom prestrukturiranja iz oktobra 2001 Hynixu dodeljena ugodnost, je v skladu s členom 1.1(b) Sporazuma SIU;
Articles 1.2 and 2 of the SCM Agreement in finding de facto specificity (two Korean claims);
ugotovitev de facto specifičnosti (2 zahtevka Koreje) je v skladu s členom 1.2 in členom 2 Sporazuma SIU;
Article 15.2 of the SCM Agreement in assessing the significance of the volume and price effects of the subsidised imports (2 Korean claims);
ocena pomembnosti obsega subvencioniranega uvoza in njegovega učinka na cene (2 zahtevka Koreje) je v skladu s členom 15.2 Sporazuma SIU;