natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As for the main alternative proposed by an American investment fund — an alternative which was rejected — the French authorities explained to the Commission's satisfaction that it would not have led to less aid.
Kar zadeva glavno alternativo, ki jo je predlagal ameriški investicijski sklad in ki je bila zavrnjena, so francoske oblasti zadovoljivo pojasnile, da ta ne bi pripeljala do nižje pomoči.
The fund proposed a larger capital injection than the EUR 33 million proposed by the group of investors, but the EUR 11 million guarantee provided by convertible bond holders covers the difference.
Ta sklad je predvideval višjo kapitalsko injekcijo od 33 milijonov EUR, ki jo je predvidela skupina vlagateljev, toda jamstvo v višini 11 milijonov EUR, ki ga dajo imetniki zamenljivih obveznic, krije razliko.
In conclusion, the Commission considers that the aid does not provide the company with surplus cash which could be used for aggressive, market-distorting activities not linked to the restructuring process.
Skratka, Komisija meni, da pomoč podjetju ne daje na voljo presežnih likvidnih sredstev, ki bi jih lahko uporabilo za agresivne dejavnosti, ki lahko izkrivljajo trg in niso povezane s prestrukturiranjem.
One time, last time principle
Načelo enkratne pomoči („enkrat in zadnjič“)
In order to prevent firms from being unfairly assisted, point 48 of the guidelines states that restructuring aid should be granted only once.
Da bi preprečili kakršno koli zlorabo podpore, točka 48 smernic določa, da se lahko pomoč za prestrukturiranje dodeli samo enkrat.
If the company concerned has already received restructuring aid in the past and if less than 10 years has elapsed since the restructuring period came to an end, the Commission will normally allow further restructuring aid only in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the company is not responsible.
Če je podjetje v preteklosti že prejelo pomoč za prestrukturiranje in če je od konca obdobja prestrukturiranja preteklo manj kot 10 let, Komisija navadno ne bo dovolila odobritve nove pomoči za prestrukturiranje, razen v izjemnih in nepredvidljivih okoliščinah, za katere podjetje ni odgovorno.
The aid notified in the present case will be paid on 31 December 2004 at the earliest.
Pomoč, priglašena v obravnavanem primeru, bo izplačana ne prej kot 31. decembra 2004.
In 1993 and 1994, the French State granted Bull restructuring aid which was approved by the Commission at the end of 1994.
V letih 1993 in 1994 je francoska država odobrila pomoč za prestrukturiranje skupine Bull, ki jo je Komisija odobrila konec leta 1994.
The restructuring plan in question concerned, however, a period lasting until the end of 1995.
Vendar pa se je zadevni načrt prestrukturiranja nanašal na obdobje do konca leta 1995.
Decision 2003/599/EC, by which the Commission approved the rescue aid [21] and which in recital 60 refers to the date of 31 December 2004 as being the date as from which further restructuring aid may be granted, is incorrect on this point.
Odločba 2003/599/ES, s katero je Komisija odobrila pomoč za reševanje [21] in ki v svoji uvodni izjavi 60 navaja datum 31. decembra 2004 kot datum, od katerega se lahko odobri nova pomoč za prestrukturiranje, je v tej točki zmotna.
The 10-year period has therefore not elapsed in the present case.
Obdobje desetih let torej v tem primeru ni preteklo.
However, the one time, last time principle cannot be applied absolutely.
Vendar pa načela enkratne pomoči ni mogoče uporabljati absolutno.
As the Court of Justice has held [22], admittedly within the framework of the ECSC Treaty, although it holds true even more so within the framework of the EC Treaty, the purpose of the provisions concerning aid is to grant the Commission power to meet unforeseen situations by taking account of the changing nature of market conditions.
Kot je razsodilo Sodišče [22], seveda v okviru Pogodbe ESPJ, vendar to še bolj drži v okviru Pogodbe ES, je namen določb v zvezi s pomočjo dati Komisiji pooblastila, ki ji bodo omogočala, da se sooči z nepričakovanimi položaji, ob upoštevanju spreminjajočih se tržnih razmer.
This being so, indiscriminate application of the one time, last time principle would excessively restrict the category of aid capable of being regarded as necessary and would not allow the Commission to examine, in each particular case, whether a project for restructuring aid was necessary in order to attain Treaty objectives.
V teh razmerah bi slepa uporaba načela enkratne pomoči pretirano omejila kategorijo pomoči, ki bi jo lahko šteli za potrebno, in Komisiji ne bi dopustila, da v vsakem posameznem primeru prouči, ali je projekt pomoči za prestrukturiranje neizogiben za uresničitev ciljev Pogodbe.
Similarly, the Commission cannot in principle base itself exclusively on the existence of an earlier decision in order to prohibit subsequent aid to the same recipient [23].
Prav tako se Komisija načeloma ne more opreti izključno na obstoj predhodne odločbe, da bi zavrnila naknadno pomoč za istega upravičenca [23].
It is against this background that the guidelines provide for the possibility of derogating from the one time, last time principle in exceptional and unforeseeable circumstances for which the company is not responsible.
Prav v tem okviru smernice predvidevajo možnost odstopanja od načela enkratne pomoči v izjemnih in nepredvidljivih okoliščinah, za katere podjetje ni odgovorno.
In this respect, it should be pointed out that, although the crisis in the information and communication technologies sector in 2001 was neither exceptional nor unforeseeable, its scale, especially in the segment of technologies related to the Internet and telecommunications, was exceptional, unforeseeable and not the fault of Bull. Another consideration to be taken into account in the present case is the very high speed of technological developments in the relevant sector.
V tem pogledu je treba poudariti, da čeprav kriza v sektorju informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij leta 2001 ni bila niti izjemna niti nepredvidljiva, pa je bil njen obseg, zlasti za segment tehnologij, povezanih z internetom in telekomunikacijami, izjemen in nepredvidljiv ter ni bil krivda skupine Bull. Drug vidik, ki ga je treba upoštevati v obravnavanem primeru, je izjemna hitrost tehnološkega razvoja v zadevnem sektorju.
Moreover, it should be stressed in this context that Bull and the French State had scrupulously adhered to the earlier restructuring plan, notably as regards the privatisation, the partnership with NEC and France Télécom and the sale of several assets, as proposed by an independent expert and as supported by the Commission, and that the said plan could not have foreseen the current difficulties.
Poleg tega je treba v tem okviru poudariti, da sta Bull in francoska država natančno upoštevala predhodni načrt prestrukturiranja, zlasti privatizacijo, partnerstvo s podjetjema NEC in France Télécom ter prodajo več sredstev, kot je to predlagal neodvisni strokovnjak in pozneje podprla Komisija, ter da navedeni načrt ni mogel preprečiti sedanjih težav.
The financial difficulties at that time were largely linked to divisions and subsidiaries which were sold under the restructuring plan, notably Zenith Data Systems in the microcomputers sector and the OSS division.
Finančne težave v tistem času so bile namreč večinoma povezane z oddelki in podružnicami, ki so bili prodani v okviru načrta prestrukturiranja, zlasti Zenith Data Systems v sektorju mikroračunalnikov in oddelek OSS.
A first restructuring of Bull has indeed taken place, in the course of which the company tried to adapt to its environment.
Prvo prestrukturiranje skupine Bull se je dejansko zgodilo in v okviru tega se je podjetje poskušalo prilagoditi svojemu okolju.
The downsizing of the company's workforce reflects this radical change: from 44500 in 1990, it shrank to 24000 in 1995 and to 11500 in 1999.
Zmanjšanje števila zaposlenih v podjetju izraža to radikalno spremembo: s 44500 leta 1990 so prešli na 24000 leta 1995 in na 11500 leta 1999.
The current difficulties, as described in recitals 9 to 12, differ in their nature from those which led to the 1993-95 restructurings.
Sedanje težave, kot so opisane v uvodnih izjavah 9 do 12, se po svoji naravi razlikujejo od težav, ki so pripeljale do prestrukturiranja med letoma 1993 in 1995.
It follows that, in the present case, the philosophy behind the one time, last time principle, namely the wish to prevent firms from being unfairly assisted, is respected.
Iz tega sledi, da je v obravnavanem primeru filozofija, ki ureja načelo enkratne pomoči, tj. preprečiti vsako zlorabo podpore, upoštevana.
The State has not propped up Bull artificially despite the fact that its difficulties are of a recurring nature; on the contrary, the aid to which this Decision relates was intended to deal with difficulties that are new in nature.
Država skupine Bull ni umetno ohranjala pri življenju, čeprav naj bi se njene težave ponavljale; nasprotno, pomoč, ki je predmet te odločbe, je namenjena za reševanje nove vrste težav.
It should be added that the 10-year period has almost elapsed.
Poleg tega je treba dodati še, da je obdobje desetih let skoraj preteklo.
In conclusion, in the circumstances of the present case, the Commission considers that the one time, last time criterion is not a bar to the notified aid being authorised.
Skratka, v okoliščinah obravnavanega primera Komisija meni, da merilo enkratne pomoči ne nasprotuje odobritvi priglašene pomoči.
‘Deggendorf’ principle
Načelo „Deggendorf“
According to the judgment of the Court of Justice in Deggendorf [24], when the Commission examines the compatibility of aid, it must take all the relevant factors into account, including any cumulative effect of that aid and other aid which has not been repaid.
Glede na sodno prakso Sodišča v zadevi „Deggendorf“ [24] mora Komisija, ko proučuje združljivost pomoči, upoštevati vse umestne elemente in zlasti skupni učinek te in drugih nepovrnjenih pomoči.
In the present case, Bull has at its disposal the rescue aid the authorisation of which was subject to its being reimbursed by Bull by 17 June 2003 at the latest.
V obravnavanem primeru Bull razpolaga s pomočjo za reševanje, katere odobritev je bila pogojena s tem, da jo Bull povrne najpozneje do 17. junija 2003.
According to the French authorities, the notified aid will, however, not be paid until after the rescue aid has been reimbursed.
Glede na francoske oblasti bo priglašena pomoč izplačana šele, ko bo povrnjena pomoč za reševanje.
This being so, the ‘Deggendorf’ principle is respected, although the Commission will have to ensure that that is the case.
V teh pogojih je načelo „Deggendorf“ upoštevano, vendar se mora Komisija vseeno prepričati, da bo to tako.
Implementation of the restructuring plan communicated
Upoštevanje sporočenega načrta prestrukturiranja
In accordance with point 43 of the guidelines, the restructuring plan communicated to the Commission, as explained and added to, must be implemented in full.
V skladu s točko 43 smernic je treba v celoti upoštevati načrt prestrukturiranja, sporočen Komisiji, kot je bil opredeljen in dopolnjen.
Monitoring and reports
Nadzor in poročila
In accordance with points 45 and 46 of the guidelines, annual reports must be communicated to the Commission.
V skladu s točkama 45 in 46 smernic je treba Komisiji pošiljati letna poročila.
The Commission considers that the restructuring aid for Bull notified by France may be declared compatible with the common market provided that all the commitments undertaken by France and all the conditions imposed are fulfilled,
Komisija meni, da se lahko pomoč za prestrukturiranje v korist družbe Bull, ki jo je priglasila Francija, razglasi za združljivo s skupnim trgom, če so vse obveznosti, ki jih je sprejela Francija, in vsi naloženi pogoji izpolnjeni –
The State aid which France is planning to implement for Bull, which consists of a EUR 517 million payment coupled with a better fortunes clause, is compatible with the common market subject to the conditions laid down in Article 2.
Državna pomoč, ki jo namerava Francija izvršiti v korist družbe Bull in ki vključuje izplačilo 517 milijonov EUR ter klavzulo o vračanju v boljše čase, je združljiva s skupnim trgom ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 2.
Bull's restructuring plan, as communicated to the Commission by France, shall be implemented in full.
Načrt prestrukturiranja, kot ga je Francija sporočila Komisiji, se izvaja v celoti.
The aid referred to in Article 1 shall not be paid until the rescue aid approved by Decision 2003/599/EC has been reimbursed.
Pomoč iz člena 1 se ne izplača pred povračilom pomoči za reševanje, odobrene z Odločbo 2003/599/ES.
It shall be paid on 31 December 2004 at the earliest.
Izplača se ne prej kot 31. decembra 2004.
France shall submit to the Commission annual reports on the implementation of the restructuring plan for the period up to the end of 2007.
Francija predloži Komisiji letno poročilo o izvajanju načrta prestrukturiranja za obdobje do konca leta 2007.
France shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Francija obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi o ukrepih, sprejetih za ravnanje v skladu s to odločbo.
OJ C 102, 28.4.2004, p. 12.
UL C 102, 28.4.2004, str. 12.
OJ L 209, 19.8.2003, p. 1.
UL L 209, 19.8.2003, str. 1.
Case registered under the number C-504/03.
Zadeva, evidentirana pod številko C-504/03.
OJ L 386, 31.12.1994, p. 1.
UL L 386, 31.12.1994, str. 1.
For more details of the restructuring plan, see Decision 2003/599/EC.
Za več podrobnosti o načrtu prestrukturiranja glej Odločbo 2003/599/ES.
Earnings before interest and tax.
Dobiček pred obrestmi in davki (Earnings before interest and taxes)
A new version of the guidelines was published recently (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
Nova različica smernic je bila objavljena pred kratkim (UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 2).
In accordance with point 103 of this new version, the aid measure in the present case must be examined in the light of the criteria that were in force when the measure was notified, that is to say, in the light of the 1999 guidelines.
V skladu s točko 103 te nove različice je treba pomoč v tem primeru proučiti ob upoštevanju meril, veljavnih ob priglasitvi pomoči, to je ob upoštevanju smernic iz leta 1999.
Since 2001, the equity capital has been negative, amounting to minus EUR 726 million at the end of 2003. Losses in 2000, 2001 and 2002 came to EUR 243 million, EUR 253 million and EUR 548 million.
Od leta 2001 je lasten kapital negativen in konec leta 2003 znaša – 726 milijonov EUR. Izgube v letih 2000, 2001 in 2002 so znašale 243 milijonov EUR, 253 milijonov EUR in 548 milijonov EUR.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 15 May 1997 in Case C-355/95 P Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH v Commission of the European Communities and Federal Republic of Germany [1997] ECR I-2549.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 15. maja 1997 v primeru C-355/95 P, Textilwerke Deggendorf GmbH proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti in Zvezni republiki Nemčiji [1997], PSES str. I-2549.
For example, Forrester, ‘Market overview — Exploiting open source in Europe’, 22.6.2004.
Na primer, Forrester, „Market overview – Exploiting open source in Europe“, 22.6.2004.
See The Clipper Group Navigator, ‘Bull transitions GCOS 8 to Open Systems — Novascale 9000 to the Rescue’, 15.10.2003 and IDC, ‘Vendor needs and Strategies, Bull fills out Novascale line — targets commercial and High-Performance Computing (HPC) Customers in 2004’, April 2004.
Glej The Clipper Group Navigator, „Bull transitions GCOS 8 to Open Systems – Novascale 9000 to the Rescue“, 15.10.2003 in IDC, „Vendor needs and Strategies, Bull fills out Novascale line – targets commercial and High-Performance Computing (HPC) Customers in 2004“, april 2004.
IDC, for example, concludes that ‘Bull’s introduction of NovaScale servers in 2003 saw it enhancing its approach to the high-performance computing market — a market it had previously addressed.
IDC, na primer, ugotavlja: „Uvedba strežnikov NovaScale leta 2003 je podjetju omogočila izboljšanje pristopa k trgu visoko zmogljivih računalnikov – trgu, ki se ga je lotil že predhodno.
It has won a reasonable number of reference customers in this sector over the last year.
V zadnjem letu je osvojilo precejšnje število referenčnih strank v tem sektorju.
… The addition of the Microsoft Windows 2003 Server operating system and SQL Server, plus new ISV software — especially from Oracle, SAP and BEA — will see it matching an expected growth in demand for high-end commercial applications in the recovering European market.’
(…) Dodatek operacijskega sistema za strežnik Microsoft Windows 2003 in strežnika SQL ter nova programska oprema ISV – zlasti Oracla, SAP in BEA – bodo omogočili, da se odzove na pričakovano povečanje povpraševanja po visoko zmogljivih komercialnih aplikacijah na okrevajočem evropskem trgu.“
See footnote 12.
Glej opombo 12.
Commission Decision of 31 January 2002 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.2609 — HP/Compaq) on the basis of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (OJ C 39, 13.2.2002, p. 23).
Odločba Komisije z dne 31. januarja 2002 o razglasitvi združljivosti združitve s skupnim trgom (Zadeva N IV/M.2609 – HP/Compaq) na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 (UL C 39, 13.2.2002, str. 23).
Commission Decision of 24 November 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3307 — Cap Gemini/Transiciel) on the basis of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (OJ C 295, 5.12.2003, p. 16).
Odločba Komisije z dne 24. novembra 2003 o razglasitvi združljivosti združitve s skupnim trgom (Zadeva N IV/M.3307 – Cap Gemini/Transiciel) na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 (UL C 295, 5.12.2003, str. 16).
Commission Decision of 10 November 2003 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3295 — Atos Origin/Sema Group) on the basis of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (OJ C 295, 5.12.2003, p. 16).
Odločba Komisije z dne 10. novembra 2003 o razglasitvi združljivosti združitve s skupnim trgom (Zadeva N IV/M.3295 – Atos Origin/Sema Group) na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 (UL C 295, 5.12.2003, str. 16).
This amount does not include the advance granted by the State at the end of December 2001 or the resources which Bull may have generated thanks to that advance.
Ta znesek ne vključuje predujma, ki ga je država dodelila konec decembra leta 2001, niti sredstev, ki jih je lahko Bull ustvaril zaradi tega predujma.
Judgment of the Court of 23 November 2000 Case C-441/97 P Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl, Thyssen Stahl AG, Preussag Stahl AG and Hoogovens Staal BV, formerly Hoogovens Groep BV v Commission of the European Communities [2000] ECR I-10293, paragraph 55.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 23. novembra 2000, primer C-441/97 P, Wirtschaftsvereinigung Stahl Thyssen Stahl AG, Preussag Stahl AG in Hoogovens Staal BV, bivši Hoogovens Groep BV proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2000], PSES str. I-10293, točka 55.
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-110/02 Commission v Council, paragraph 43 (not yet reported).
Sklepne ugotovitve generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa v zadevi C-110/02, Komisija proti Svetu, točka 43 (še ni objavljeno).
See footnote 11.
Glej opombo 11.
In the case of servers, the amount of growth will depend above all on the technologies used; in particular, Intel Itanium components, which form the basis of Bull's new range of servers and which were first used in 2003, should generate a turnover of EUR 8 billion in 2008.
Pri strežnikih bo rast odvisna predvsem od uporabljenih tehnologij; zlasti komponente Intel Itanium, ki so osnovni del nove ponudbe strežnikov skupine Bull in ki so bile prvič uporabljene leta 2003, bi morale doseči 8 milijard EUR prometa leta 2008.
The market for services is highly dispersed, highly competitive and in a permanent state of restructuring, but in the medium to long term it will expand more rapidly than the market for products.
Trg storitev je zelo razpršen, zelo konkurenčen in v stalnem prestrukturiranju, vendar bo njegova srednje- in dolgoročna rast hitrejša kot rast trga proizvodov.
Shareholders, both existing and new, have contributed to the recapitalisation to the tune of EUR 44,2 million, which is a substantial contribution.
Obstoječi in novi delničarji so k prestrukturiranju prispevali 44,2 milijona EUR, kar pomeni znaten prispevek.
The fact that the subscription to the investors’ capital stems partly from companies having partnerships with Bull (France Télécom, NEC), from customers (Debeka) and from senior managers of the Bull group in no way detracts from this finding.
Dejstvo, da vpis kapitala vlagateljev izvira deloma iz podjetij, s katerimi ima Bull sklenjena partnerstva (France Télécom, NEC), od strank (Debeka) in vodilnih kadrov skupine Bull, te ugotovitve ne omaja.
[…] (*) shows that this type of customer wishes to see Bull's offerings maintained.
[…] kaže, da ta tip strank želi, da se ponudba skupine Bull ohrani.
The markets concerned are, however, highly specific niche markets and Bull's continued existence has little impact on competition in the high-end server segment as a whole.
Vendar pa gre tu za zelo posebne tržne niše in zagotovitev nadaljnjega obstoja skupine Bull zelo malo vpliva na konkurenco v segmentu visoko zmogljivih strežnikov kot celote.
a 90 % reduction in the EUR 204 million debt owed to convertible bond holders, combined with an offer to convert their securities into equity or into equity coupled with stock-options. This is reflected in an extension of the due date of their bonds, a reduction in the yearly coupon payment and the abolition of the redemption premium.
devetdesetodstotno zmanjšanje dolga v višini 204 milijone EUR za imetnike zamenljivih obveznic v povezavi s ponudbo za zamenjavo njihovih vrednostnih papirjev v delnice ali v delnice z opcijami na delnice, kar naj bi dosegli s podaljšanjem datuma zapadlosti njihovih obveznic, znižanjem letnega kupona in ukinitvijo odkupne premije.
authorising Member States to take decisions under Council Directive 1999/105/EC on assurances afforded in respect of forest reproductive material produced in third countries
o pooblastilu državam članicam za odločanje v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 1999/105/ES o zagotovilih, danih v zvezi z gozdnim reprodukcijskim materialom, proizvedenim v tretjih državah
(notified under document number C(2005) 5485)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 5485)
Having regard to the Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material [1], and in particular Article 19(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/105/ES z dne 22. decembra 1999 o trženju gozdnega reprodukcijskega materiala [1], in zlasti člena 19(3) Direktive,
Pursuant to Article 19(1) of Directive 1999/105/EC, the Council on a proposal from the Commission is to determine whether forest reproductive material produced in a third country affords the same assurances as regards the approval of its basic material and the measures taken for its production with a view to marketing as does forest reproductive material produced within the Community and complying with the provisions of that Directive.
V skladu s členom 19(1) Direktive 1999/105/ES mora Svet na predlog Komisije odločiti, ali gozdni reprodukcijski material, pridelan v tretji državi, daje enaka zagotovila glede odobritve njegovega izhodiščnega materiala in z ukrepov pri njegovi proizvodnji za trženje kakor gozdni reprodukcijski material, proizveden znotraj Skupnosti, ki izpolnjuje določbe navedene Direktive.
The information presently available on the conditions applying in third countries is, however, still not sufficient to enable the Community to make any such decision in respect of any third country.
Vendar trenutno razpoložljivi podatki o pogojih, veljavnih v tretjih državah, še vedno ne zadostujejo, da bi Skupnosti omogočili sprejemanje kakršne koli takšne odločitve v zvezi s katero koli tretjo državo.