natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that the Aid Guide drafted by ADEC states that the maximum rate must not exceed the rate provided for in the Regulation on structural measures financed from the FIFG.
Komisija dejansko ugotavlja, da „Vodnik o pomoči“, ki ga je pripravil ADEC, navaja, da najvišja stopnja ne sme preseči stopnje, ki jo predvideva uredba o strukturnih ukrepih IFOP.
This aid is, in this respect, therefore compatible with the common market, subject to what is stated below.
S tega stališča je torej ta pomoč ob upoštevanju spodnjih navedb združljiva s skupnim trgom.
There remains, however, the problem of aid granted over the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998 in view of the obligation on France to stop paying aid for constructing or modernising vessels under the rules of the common fisheries policy, which was lifted by letter dated 28 October 1998 [15].
Dejansko ostaja posebna težava pri pomoči, dodeljeni v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998, in sicer zaradi obveze Francije, da ob uporabi pravil skupne ribiške politike ukine vsakršno pomoč za izgradnjo ali posodobitev. Ta obveza je bila ukinjena s pismom z dne 28. oktobra 1998 [15].
In its letter dated 30 October 2001 informing France of the opening of the formal investigation procedure, the Commission assumed that aid had been granted during this period.
Komisija je v pismu z dne 30. oktobra 2001, s katerim je Francijo obvestila o uvedbi uradnega postopka obravnave, predvidela, da je bila v tistem obdobju pomoč dodeljena.
This hypothesis was based on two factors: firstly, the fact that, according to France’s letter dated 11 April 2001, Assembly of Corsica Decision 97/36 had not been amended, which meant that the Decision had been applied continuously from the date of its adoption until the end of 1999 and, secondly, the fact that the report of the National Assembly expressly stated that aid had actually been granted for constructing vessels in 1997 (point I.C.1.b of the report).
Takšna domneva je temeljila na dveh elementih: po eni strani na dejstvu, da glede na pismo Francije z dne 11. aprila 2001 Sklep korziške skupščine št. 97/36 ni bil predmet kasnejših sprememb, kar je implicitno pomenilo, da je ta sklep nepretrgoma veljal od datuma sprejetja do konca leta 1999, ter po drugi strani na dejstvu, da je poročilo Narodne skupščine izrecno navajalo, da je bila pomoč dejansko namenjena izgradnji ladij v letu 1997 (točka I.C.1.b navedenega poročila).
It would be useful to quote an extract from the report of the National Assembly:
Velja navesti odlomek iz poročila Narodne skupščine:
In 1997, ADEC processed 114 applications submitted by both private undertakings, for the purposes of modernising the fleet and aquaculture… Of the 114 applications processed, only 16 were rejected.
Službe ADEC so v letu 1997 tako obravnavale 114 zahtev zasebnih podjetij v zvezi s posodobitvijo majhnih ladjevij in ribogojstva … Samo 16 od 114 preučenih zahtev je bilo zavrnjenih.
In total, the applications resulted in aid from the Corsican authorities of more than FRF 13 million, made up of FRF 11,5 million as investment aid and FRF 1,6 million as operating aid.
Korziška teritorialna skupnost je za vse predstavljene spise namenila skupni znesek subvencij v višini več kot 13 milijonov frankov, pri čemer je bilo 11,5 milijona pomoči dodeljene za naložbe in 1,6 milijona za delovanje.
Almost half of the aid granted for investments was for modernising the fleet.
Skoraj polovica pomoči, namenjene za naložbe, je bilo povezane z deli za posodobitev majhnega ladjevja.
In 1997, 10 fishing vessels were constructed, …’.
Leta 1997 je bilo zgrajenih 10 ribiških ladij […]“
France made no comment regarding the assumption made in the Commission’s letter dated 30 October 2001, neither stating, for example, that application of Decision 97/36 had been suspended nor that no aid had been granted during the period concerned.
Francija v zvezi z domnevo v pismu Komisije z dne 30. oktobra 2001 ni imela pripomb, s katerimi bi denimo opozorila, da je bila uporaba zadevnega Sklepa št. 97/36 začasno prekinjena ali da med zadevnim obdobjem pomoč ni bila dodeljena.
It is therefore safe to assume that aid was actually granted during that period.
Lahko torej smatramo, da je bila v tistem obdobju pomoč dejansko dodeljena.
The successive versions of the Guidelines consistently stipulated that aid for purchasing new vessels was compatible with the common market if it was granted for investments that contributed to achieving the objectives of the MAGP [16].
Zaporedne različice glavnih smernic so ves čas predvidevale, da je pomoč za nakup novih ladij združljiva s skupnim trgom, če se dodeli za naložbe, ki se uvrščajo med cilje POP [16].
More specifically, for aid granted from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998, to which the 1997 Guidelines applied, point 2.2.3.1 of those Guidelines laid down that ‘Aid for the construction of new fishing vessels may be deemed to be compatible with the common market subject to the requirements of Articles 7 and 10 and Annex III (paragraph 1.3) of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 […].’
Natančneje, pri pomoči, dodeljeni med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998, za katero so veljale glavne smernice iz leta 1997, je točka 2.2.3.1 navedenih glavnih smernic navajala, da „se pomoč za izgradnjo novih ribiških ladij lahko smatra za združljivo s skupnim trgom ob upoštevanju pogojev, ki jih določajo člena 7 in 10 ter Priloga III (točka 1.3) k Uredbi (ES) št. 3699/93 […]“.
Under that provision, the Commission reminded France by letter dated 4 July 1997, that ‘it must therefore stop granting aid for construction or modernisation as from 1 January 1997’.
Države članice Komisiji hkrati z vsemi projekti pomoči s tega področja sporočijo določbe, sprejete za zagotovitev upoštevanja tega pogoja.“ V skladu s to določbo je Komisija v pismu z dne 4. julija 1997 Francijo spomnila, da „mora torej s 1. januarjem 1997 ukiniti dodeljevanje vsakršne pomoči za izgradnjo in posodobitev.“
By letter dated 8 August 1997, France replied, indicating in particular that: ‘At the beginning of 1996, the intermediate objectives of MAGP II not having been achieved by 31 December 1995, the French authorities had already taken the necessary steps to freeze investment projects resulting in increased fleet capacity.
Francija je odgovorila s pismom z dne 8. avgusta 1997, v katerem je predvsem navedla: „Ker vmesni cilji POP II do 31.12.1995 niso bili doseženi, so že v začetku leta 1996 francoske oblasti sprejele potrebne ukrepe za zamrznitev naložbenih projektov za povečanje zmogljivosti ladjevja.
In addition, in July 1996, in order to accelerate the reduction in the fishing fleet, a plan for the withdrawal of fishing vessels from the fleet was implemented…, the plan provided for the withdrawal from the fleet of between 10000 kW and 15000 kW.
Sicer pa je bil julija 1996 uveden načrt za odpis ladjevja, s katerim bi pospešili zmanjšanje ribiškega ladjevja.[…] odpis ladjevja je bil predviden za 10000 do 15000 kW.
Therefore, at the beginning of 1997, France thought it would be able to fulfil its objectives under MAGP III.
Francija je v začetku leta 1997 tudi menila, da bo lahko izpolnila svoje cilje v okviru POP III.
Consequently, authorisation was given for limited volumes of investment, accompanied by national aid, essentially in cases where there was an urgent need to replace vessels or fit new engines… However, the full effects of the withdrawal measures were seen only at the end of the first half of 1997…’.
Zato so bila skupaj z državno pomočjo odobrena omejena naložbena dovoljenja, ki so bila v glavnem povezana z nujnimi postopki zamenjave ladij ali s postopki remotorizacije … Vendar pa so se dokončni učinki ukrepov odpisa ladjevja potrdili šele konec prvega semestra 1997 […]“
In fact, it was only in the second half of 1998 that France was able to achieve the objectives of the MAGP.
Dejansko je Francija šele v drugem semestru leta 1998 lahko dosegla cilje POP.
By letter dated 28 October 1998, the Commission informed France that ‘following our meeting of 21 October 1998, our previous meetings and the clarifications contained in your letters dated 5 and 22 October 1998, I have the pleasure to announce that the Directorate-General for Fisheries can accept a resumption of investments such as you envisage, i.e, in a very measured manner, giving priority to young fishermen, without increasing capacity and in compliance with the objectives of the MAGP’.
Kot je Komisija v pismu z dne 28. oktobra 1998 obvestila Francijo, „po našem pogovoru z dne 21. oktobra 1998, naših predhodnih sestankih in podrobnostih, ki ste jih navedli v svojih pismih z dne 5. in 22. oktobra 1998, vam z veseljem sporočam, da Generalni direktorat za ribištvo lahko sprejme obnovitev naložb, kot ste jo predvideli, to pomeni, zelo previdno in z dajanjem prednosti predvsem koristi mladih ribičev, ne da bi se pri tem povečala zmogljivost, in z upoštevanjem ciljev POP.“
It can be seen from this exchange of correspondence that France was perfectly aware that it was not achieving the intermediate objectives of MAGP III and that, despite this, aid for purchasing new vessels was authorised.
Kot lahko sklepamo iz te izmenjave pisem, se je Francija dobro zavedala, da ne bo dosegla vmesnih ciljev POP III, a je kljub temu odobrila pomoč za nakup novih ladij.
The requirements laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 was not therefore fulfilled.
Pogoj iz člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 3699/93 torej ni bil upoštevan.
Consequently, under point 2.2.3.1 of the 1997 Guidelines, the aid granted during that period for purchasing new vessels was incompatible with the common market.
Iz tega izhaja, da je bila ob uporabi točke 2.2.3.1 glavnih smernic iz leta 1997 v tem obdobju dodeljena pomoč za nakup novih ladij nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Aid for converting and equipping vessels (1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998)
Pomoč za predelavo in opremo ladij (obdobje med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998)
The opening of the formal investigation procedure concerned aids for converting and equipping vessels granted during the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998 where the work carried out increased the power of the vessel, because, as in the case of the aid for purchasing new vessels, such aid did not contribute to achieving the objectives of the MAGP.
Uvedba uradnega postopka obravnave je bila povezana s pomočjo za predelavo in opremo ladij, dodeljeno v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998, če se je zaradi izvedenih del povečala zmogljivost ladje. Tovrstna pomoč se podobno kot pomoč za nakup novih ladij ni uvrščala med cilje POP.
The report of the National Assembly (point I.C.1.b) refers to aid for modernising vessels.
V poročilu Narodne skupščine (točka I.C.1.b) je upoštevana pomoč za posodobitev ladij.
As well as stating that ten fishing vessels had been built, the report also said that ‘… 38 vessels have undergone various types of alterations and re-equipping…’.
Enako kot je bilo navedeno, da je bilo zgrajenih 10 ribiških ladij, je bilo omenjeno da „[…] je bilo 38 ladij različno predelanih in opremljenih […]“.
It is therefore clear that aid for modernising vessels was granted during the period.
Očitno je torej, da je bila v tem obdobju dodeljena pomoč za posodobitev.
In addition, as in the case of aid for purchasing vessels, France made no comment regarding the assumption made in the Commission’s letter dated 30 October 2001 that aid for purchasing an engine more powerful than an existing engine was granted during the period.
Poleg tega Francija enako kot pri pomoči za nakup ladij ni imela nobenih pripomb v zvezi z domnevo iz pisma Komisije z dne 30. oktobra 2001, po kateri je bila v tem obdobju dodeljena pomoč za nakup zmogljivejšega motorja, kot je bil prejšnji.
It is therefore safe to assume that aid for modernising vessels was actually granted in certain cases where the work carried out resulted in increased engine power.
Lahko torej smatramo, da je bila pomoč za posodobitev, s katero bi se povečala zmogljivost, v teh posameznih primerih dejansko dodeljena.
As in the case of aid for construction, point 2.2.3.2 of the 1997 Guidelines stipulates that ‘Aid for the modernisation of commissioned vessels may be deemed compatible with the common market subject to the requirements of Articles 7 and 10 of, and Annex III (paragraph 1.4) to, Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 [… ]’.
V glavnih smernicah iz leta 1997 je bilo enako kot pri pomoči za izgradnjo v točki 2.2.3.2 navedeno, da „se pomoč za posodobitev delujočih ribiških ladij lahko smatra za združljivo s skupnim trgom ob upoštevanju pogojev, ki jih določajo člena 7 in 10 ter Priloga III (točka 1.4) k Uredbi (ES) št. 3699/93 […]“.
Article 10(2), of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 lays down that ‘Member States may take measures to promote the modernisation of fishing vessels. Such measures shall be subject to the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 (construction of vessels) where investments are likely to result in an increase in fishing effort’.
Odstavek 2 člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 3699/93 je predvidel, da „države članice lahko sprejmejo ukrepe za posodobitev ribiških ladij; za te ukrepe veljajo pogoji iz odstavka 1 [izgradnja ladij], če bi se zaradi naložb lahko povečala ribolovna učinkovitost.“
The requirement laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 3699/93 was not therefore fulfilled.
Pogoj iz člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 3699/93 torej ni bil upoštevan.
Consequently, under point 2.2.3.2 of the 1997 Guidelines, aid granted during that period for modernising vessels, where modernisation resulted in increased power, was incompatible with the common market.
Iz tega izhaja, da je bila ob uporabi točke 2.2.3.2 glavnih smernic iz leta 1997 v tem obdobju pomoč za posodobitev, zaradi katere se je povečala zmogljivost, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Aid for purchasing second-hand vessels (1986-1999)
Pomoč za nakup rabljenih ladij (obdobje 1986–1999)
As already indicated in recital 39, France provided information showing that the age requirement had actually been respected.
Kot je bilo navedeno že v uvodni izjavi 39, je Francija priskrbela podatke, ki so pokazali, da je bilo starostno merilo dejansko upoštevano.
The doubts expressed on this subject by the Commission in opening the formal investigation procedure have therefore been dispelled.
Dvomov, ki jih je Komisija izrazila pri uvedbi uradnega postopka obravnave, torej ni več.
The same holds for the maximum possible rate of aid.
Enako velja za najvišjo možno stopnjo pomoči.
In addition, with regard to the requirement to restrict such aid to first purchases by young fishermen and the replacement of vessels following total loss, France also indicated in its reply dated 21 December 2001 that this aid was granted in accordance with the Community provisions in force.
Sicer pa je Francija v svojem odgovoru z dne 21. decembra 2001 v zvezi z obvezo, da tovrstno pomoč prihrani za začetek delovanja mladih ribičev ali za nadomestitev ladje po popolni izgubi, navedla, da je bila tovrstna pomoč v tem pogledu dodeljena ob upoštevanju veljavnih določb Skupnosti.
Consequently, this aid can be deemed to be compatible with the common market.
Zato se lahko smatra, da je tovrstna pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom.
Aid for aquaculture (1994-1999)
Pomoč za ribogojstvo (obdobje 1994–1999)
In accordance with the successive versions of the Guidelines, aid for aquaculture is compatible with the common market where the requirements laid down in the Regulation on Community structural measures in the fisheries sector are fulfilled.
Pomoč za ribogojstvo je v skladu z zaporednimi različicami glavnih smernic združljiva s skupnim trgom, če se upoštevajo pogoji uredbe o strukturnih skladih Skupnosti v ribiškem sektorju.
As France indicated in its letter dated 21 December 2001, the Aid Guide took account of those requirements, stipulating in particular that the maximum authorised aid rate must take account of aid from other sources.
Kot je v svojem pismu z dne 21. decembra 2001 navedla Francija, je „Vodnik o pomoči“ te pogoje upošteval, pri čemer je bilo posebej navedeno, da mora najvišja stopnja odobrene pomoči upoštevati pomoč iz drugih virov.
Accordingly, the aid granted for aquaculture can be deemed to be compatible with the common market.
Zato se pomoč za ribogojstvo lahko smatra za združljivo s skupnim trgom.
CONCLUSIONS
SKLEPNE UGOTOVITVE
The following State aid implemented in the Region of Corsica in France by Decision of the Assembly of Corsica 85/10a of 29 March 1985, as amended by Decision 90/99 of 30 November 1990, Decision 91/1032 of 19 December 1991, Decision 93/25 of 23 February 1993, Decision 95/16 of 9 March 1995, Decision 95/79 of 11 September 1995 and Decision 97/36 of 11 April 1997 is incompatible with the common market:
Državna pomoč, ki je bila v Franciji v korziški regiji uvedena s Sklepom korziške skupščine št. 85/10 bis z dne 29. marca 1985, ki je bil naknadno spremenjen s sklepi z dne 30. novembra 1990 (št. 90/99), 19. decembra 1991 (št. 91/1032), 23. februarja 1993 (št. 93/25), 9. marca 1995 (št. 95/16), 11. septembra 1995 (št. 95/79) in 11. aprila 1997 (št. 97/36), je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kar zadeva:
aid for purchasing new vessels granted during the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998,
pomoč za nakup novih ladij, dodeljeno v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998,
aid for converting and equipping existing vessels granted during the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998 where the work carried out resulted in increased engine power.
pomoč za predelavo in opremo obstoječih ladij, dodeljeno v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998, če se je zaradi del povečala zmogljivost.
In accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, France must recover the aid concerned.
Francija mora v skladu s členom 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 začeti izterjavo te pomoči.
The following aid is compatible with the common market:
Naslednje vrste pomoči so združljive s skupnim trgom:
aid for purchasing new vessels granted outside the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998,
pomoč za nakup novih ladij, ki ni bila dodeljena v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998,
aid for converting and equipping existing vessels granted outside the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998 or granted during that period where the work carried out did not result in increased engine power,
pomoč za predelavo in opremo obstoječih ladij, ki ni bila dodeljena v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998 ali je bila dodeljena v tem obdobju, če se zmogljivost ni povečala,
aid for purchasing second-hand vessels,
pomoč za nakup rabljenih ladij,
aid for aquaculture,
pomoč za ribogojstvo –
The following aid measures implemented by France in the Region of Corsica and introduced by Decision of the Assembly of Corsica 85/10a of 29 March 1985, as amended by Decision 90/99 of 30 November 1990, Decision 91/1032 of 19 December 1991, Decision 93/25 of 23 February 1993, Decision 95/16 of 9 March 1995, Decision 95/79 of 11 September 1995 and Decision 97/36 of 11 April 1997 are incompatible with the common market:
Ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Francija izvedla v korziški regiji in so bili uvedeni s Sklepom korziške skupščine št. 85/10 bis z dne 29. marca 1985, naknadno spremenjenim s sklepi z dne 30. novembra 1990 (št. 90/99), 19. decembra 1991 (št. 91/1032), 23. februarja 1993 (št. 93/25), 9. marca 1995 (št. 95/16), 11. septembra 1995 (št. 95/79) in 11. aprila 1997 (št. 97/36), so nezdružljivi s skupnim trgom, kar zadeva:
aid for purchasing new vessels granted during the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998;
pomoč za nakup novih ladij, dodeljeno v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998;
The following aid measures implemented by France in the Region of Corsica and introduced by the Decision of the Assembly of Corsica referred to in Article 1 are compatible with the common market:
Naslednji ukrepi pomoči, ki jih je Francija izvedla v korziški regiji in jih je uvedel sklep korziške skupščine iz člena 1, so združljivi s skupnim trgom:
aid for purchasing new vessels granted outside the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998;
pomoč za nakup novih ladij, ki ni bila dodeljena v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998,
aid for converting and equipping existing vessels granted outside the period from 1 January 1997 to 28 October 1998 or granted during that period where the work carried out did not result in increased engine power;
pomoč za predelavo in opremo obstoječih ladij v obdobju, ki ni bila dodeljena v obdobju med 1. januarjem 1997 in 28. oktobrom 1998 ali je bila dodeljena v tem obdobju, če se zmogljivost ni povečala;
aid for purchasing second-hand vessels;
pomoč za nakup rabljenih ladij;
aid for aquaculture granted from 1994 to 1999.
pomoč za ribogojstvo med letoma 1994 in 1999.
France shall take all measures necessary to recover from the beneficiaries the aid referred to in Article 1 that was unlawfully granted to them.
Francija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da od svojih upravičencev izterja pomoč iz člena 1, ki jim je že bila nezakonito dodeljena.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this Decision.
Izterjava se izvede nemudoma in v skladu s postopki nacionalnega prava, če ti omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršitev te odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was granted to the recipient until the date of its recovery.
Pomoč, ki jo je treba izterjati, vključuje obresti od dne, ko so jo upravičenci prejeli, pa do dneva izterjave.
Interest shall be calculated and applied in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [17].
Obrestna mera, ki jo je treba uporabiti, se izračuna in uporabi v skladu s poglavjem V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [17].
France shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Francija Komisijo obvesti o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela za izvršitev te odločbe, v dveh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi.
This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Francijo.
Report available on the Internet site of the National Assembly: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dossiers/corse.asp
Poročilo je dostopno na spletni strani Narodne skupščine: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dossiers/corse.asp
OJ C 25, 29.1.2002, p. 2.
UL C 25, 29.1.2002, str. 2.
OJ C 268, 19.10.1985, p. 2.
UL C 268, 19.10.1985, str. 2.
OJ C 313, 8.12.1988, p. 21.
UL C 313, 8.12.1988, str. 21.
OJ C 152, 17.6.1992, p. 2.
UL C 152, 17.6.1992, str. 2.
OJ C 260, 17.9.1994, p. 3.
UL C 260, 17.9.1994, str. 3.
OJ C 100, 17.3.1997, p. 12.
UL C 100, 17.3.1997, str. 12.
OJ L 290, 22.10.1983, p. 1.
UL L 290, 22.10.1983, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3733/85 (OJ L 361, 31.12.1985, p. 78).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 3733/85 (UL L 361, 31.12.1985, str. 78).
OJ L 376, 31.12.1986, p. 7.
UL L 376, 31.12.1986, str. 7.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 3946/92 (OJ L 401, 31.12.1992, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 3946/92 (UL L 401, 31.12.1992, str. 1).
OJ L 346, 31.12.1993, p. 1.
UL L 346, 31.12.1993, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 25/97 (OJ L 6, 10.1.1997, p. 7).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 25/97 (UL L 6, 10.1.1997, str. 7).
OJ L 312, 20.11.1998, p. 19.
UL L 312, 20.11.1998, str. 19.
Commission Decision 92/588/EEC of 21 December 1992 on a multiannual guidance programme for the fishing fleet of France for the period 1993 to 1996 pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4028/86 (OJ L 401, 31.12.1992, p. 3).
Odločba Komisije 92/588/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1992 o večletnem usmeritvenem programu za ribiško ladjevje Francije za obdobje 1993–1996 v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4028/86 (UL L 401, 31.12.1992, str. 3.
Decision as last amended by Decision 95/238/EC (OJ L 166, 15.7.1995, p.1).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 95/238/ES (UL L 166, 15.7.1995, str. 1)).
See recital 33.
Glej uvodno izjavo 33.