natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Survey and continuous nutrient analysis shall provide data on local land use, crop rotations and practices on cattle farms.
Raziskave in stalne analize hranil zagotavljajo podatke o lokalni rabi zemljišč, kolobarjenju posevkov in praksi na govedorejskih kmetijah.
These data can be used for model-based calculations of the magnitude of nitrate leaching from fields where up to 230 kg of nitrogen per hectare per year in livestock manure is applied based on scientific principles.
Ti podatki se lahko uporabijo za modelno zasnovane izračune obsega spiranja nitratov z njiv, na katerih se uporablja živinsko gnojilo z do 230 kg dušika na hektar letno, na podlagi znanstvenih načel.
In order to prove that the derogation will not jeopardise the objective of the national action programme and the Directive, a network of sampling of soil water, streams and of shallow groundwater established as agricultural catchment monitoring sites under the national monitoring programme shall be maintained to provide data on state of nitrate content in water leaving the root zone and entering the groundwater system.
Da bi dokazali, da odstopanje ne bo ogrozilo cilja nacionalnega akcijskega programa in Direktive, se vzdržuje mreža za vzorčenje talne vode, potokov in plitve podtalnice, ki je določena za nadzorna mesta kmetijskih površin v skladu z nacionalnim programom nadzora, za zagotavljanje podatkov o vsebnosti nitratov v vodi, ki prihaja iz območij korenin in vstopa v sistem podtalnice.
The results of the monitoring shall be transmitted every year to the Commission, with a concise report on evaluation practice (controls at cattle farm level) and water quality evolution (based on root zone leaching monitoring, surface/ground water quality and model-based calculations).
Rezultati nadzora se vsako leto posredujejo Komisiji, skupaj s strnjenim poročilom o načinu vrednotenja (nadzor na ravni govedorejskih kmetij) ter oceno kakovosti vode (na podlagi spremljanja spiranja v območju korenin, kakovosti površinske vode/podtalnice in modelnih izračunov).
Based on initial assessment, first results shall be transmitted by October 2005, a second report by October 2006 and a third report by June 2008.
Na podlagi začetne ocene se prvi rezultati posredujejo do oktobra 2005, drugo poročilo se posreduje do oktobra 2006 in tretje do junija 2008.
The results thus obtained will be taken into consideration by the Commission with regard to an eventual new request for derogation by the Danish authorities, to be assessed in the framework of the procedure of Article 9 of Directive 91/676/EEC.
Komisija bo tako pridobljene rezultate upoštevala pri morebitnem novem zahtevku za odstopanje s strani danskih organov oblasti, ki bo preučen v okviru postopka iz člena 9 Direktive 91/676/EGS.
This derogation shall apply from 2 August 2004.
To odstopanje začne veljati 2. avgusta 2004.
It shall expire on 31 July 2008.
Veljati preneha 31. julija 2008.
OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1.
UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str. 1.
OJ L 319, 23.11.2002, p. 24.
UL L 319, 23.11.2002, str. 24.
on the State aid which the United Kingdom is planning to implement for Peugeot Citroën Automobiles UK Ltd
o državni pomoči, ki jo namerava Združeno kraljestvo izvajati za Peugeot Citroën Automobiles UK Ltd
(notified under document number C(2004) 3349)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 3349)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi določbami [1],
By letter dated 16 December 2002, the United Kingdom notified the Commission of a plan to grant regional aid to Peugeot Citroën Automobiles UK Ltd (hereafter PCA UK).
V pismu z dne 16. decembra 2002 je Združeno kraljestvo Komisijo obvestilo o načrtu za dodelitev regionalne pomoči Peugeot Citroën Automobiles UK Ltd (v nadaljevanju „PCA UK“).
The Commission requested further information on 7 February 2003, which was provided by the UK by letter dated 7 March 2003.
Komisija je 7. februarja 2003 zahtevala nadaljnje informacije, ki jih je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo v pismu z dne 7. marca 2003.
By letter dated 30 April 2003, the Commission informed the United Kingdom that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty as it found that doubts were raised as to the compatibility of the aid with the common market.
Komisija je v pismu z dne 30. aprila 2003 Združeno kraljestvo obvestila o svoji odločitvi za uvedbo postopka, določenega v členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES, saj je ugotovila, da obstajajo dvomi o združljivosti pomoči s skupnim trgom.
The Commission Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Odločba Komisije za uvedbo postopka je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, da predložijo svoje pripombe.
The Commission did not receive any comments from interested parties.
Komisija od zainteresiranih strank ni prejela nobenih pripomb.
After requesting an extension of the deadline to submit comments on 25 July 2003, the United Kingdom submitted its comments to the opening of the procedure on 5 September 2003.
Po zahtevi za podaljšanje roka za predložitev pripomb z dne 25. julija 2003, je Združeno kraljestvo svoje pripombe k začetku postopka predložilo 5. septembra 2003.
A meeting between the Commission, the United Kingdom and the beneficiary took place in Brussels on 17 October 2003, after which the Commission addressed a new request for information to the United Kingdom on 20 October 2003.
Komisija, Združeno kraljestvo in upravičenec so se sestali v Bruslju 17. oktobra 2003, nakar je Komisija na Združeno kraljestvo 20. oktobra 2003 naslovila novo zahtevo za informacije.
The information was provided by the United Kingdom on 19 February and 4 May 2004.
Združeno kraljestvo je informacije posredovalo 19. februarja in 4. maja 2004.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE AND ITS RECIPIENT
OPIS UKREPA IN NJEGOVEGA PREJEMNIKA
The planned aid would be granted to PCA UK, a subsidiary of the French group PSA Peugeot Citroën (hereafter PSA).
Načrtovana pomoč bi se odobrila PCA UK, hčerinskemu podjetju francoske skupine PSA Peugeot Citroën (v nadaljevanju „PSA“).
PSA designs, manufactures and sells motor vehicles.
PSA načrtuje, proizvaja in prodaja motorna vozila.
In 2003, PSA sold 3286100 vehicles worldwide, achieving a turnover of EUR 54,238 billion, and an operating margin of EUR 2,195 billion.
V letu 2003 je PSA po svetu prodal 3286100 vozil, ustvaril 54,238 milijarde EUR skupnega prometa in realiziral 2,195 milijarde EUR marže poslovanja.
The notified project concerns the investment necessary for the production of a new model that will replace the current Peugeot 206 and derivatives.
Prijavljeni projekt zadeva naložbe, potrebne za proizvodnjo novega modela, ki bo nadomestil trenutni model Peugeot 206 in derivate.
The current capacity at the Ryton plant is 183500 vehicles/year.
Trenutna zmogljivost tovarne Ryton je 183500 vozil letno.
The current 206 model will be phased out from 2008, with the introduction of a new model that will use a new platform.
Trenutni model 206 bo z uvedbo novega modela, ki bo uporabljal novo ploščad, z letom 2008 odpravljen.
Capacity at the plant is foreseen to remain constant at 183500 vehicles/year.
Predvideno je, da bo zmogljivost tovarne ostala konstantna na ravni 183500 vozil letno.
The planned start of the notified project is 2005, and the planned completion date is 2010.
Načrtovan začetek prijavljenega projekta je leto 2005, načrtovan zaključek projekta je leto 2010.
According to the United Kingdom, the project involves the installation of new (paintshop, metal finish) or transformed (bodyshop retooling for the different platform, final assembly) lines for the production of the new model.
Po podatkih Združenega kraljestva projekt vključuje preoblikovanje (predelava karoserijske delavnice za drugačno ploščad, končno sestavljanje) ali namestitev novih linij (lakirnica, linija za kovinsko barvo) za proizvodnjo novega modela.
Infrastructure works will include improved environmental, working and safety conditions, and a new car park for finished vehicles.
Infrastrukturna dela bodo vključevala izboljšane okoljske, delovne in varnostne pogoje ter novo parkirišče za končana vozila.
According to the United Kingdom, total required investment will amount to GBP 187,760 million in nominal terms.
Po podatkih Združenega kraljestva bo skupna potrebna naložba znašala nominalno 187,760 milijona GBP.
According to the United Kingdom, the project is mobile, and PSA is considering the alternative site of Trnava, in Slovakia, for the project.
Po podatkih Združenega kraljestva je projekt mobilen, PSA kot alternativno lokacijo za izvedbo projekta obravnava Trnavo na Slovaškem.
PSA announced in January 2003 that Trnava has been chosen as the location for a greenfield investment.
PSA je januarja 2003 sporočil, da ja bila Trnava izbrana kot lokacija za greenfield naložbo.
The new Trnava plant will start production in 2008, and will produce 300000 small cars/year of the same type as the new model that will replace the Peugeot 206.
Nova tovarna Trnava bo s proizvodnjo začela v letu 2008 in bo letno proizvedla 300000 majhnih avtomobilov enake vrste, kot je novi model, ki bo nadomestil model Peugeot 206.
According to the United Kingdom, PSA is considering whether to expand projected capacity at Trnava, while phasing out production at Ryton.
Po podatkih Združenega kraljestva PSA razmišlja o povečanju načrtovane zmogljivosti v Trnavi, medtem ko bi proizvodnjo v Rytonu odpravili.
Legal basis, investment and aid amounts
Pravna podlaga, naložba in zneski pomoči
The project takes place at the existing PSA plant in Ryton, in the West Midlands region.
Projekt poteka v obstoječi tovarni PSA v Rytonu, v regiji West Midlands.
Ryton-on-Dunsmore is an Article 87(3)(c) area, whose regional ceiling is 10 % net grant equivalent for the 2000 to 2006 period.
Ryton-on-Dunsmore spada v območje iz člena 87(3)(c), njegova regionalna zgornja meja znaša 10 % neto protivrednosti pomoči za obdobje od leta 2000 do leta 2006.
The notified aid is granted under the approved Regional Selective Assistance scheme [3] with the legal basis in Section 7 of Industrial Development Act 1982.
Prijavljena pomoč je dodeljena na podlagi odobrenega regionalnega programa selektivne pomoči [3] s pravno podlago v oddelku 7 Zakona o industrijskem razvoju iz leta 1982.
The proposed aid takes the form of a direct grant, and would be paid over the 2005 to 2010 period.
Načrtovana pomoč je v obliki neposrednih povratnih sredstev in se izplača v obdobju od leta 2005 do leta 2010.
It amounts to nominal GBP 19,100 million gross grant equivalent, with an actualised value of GBP 14,411 million gross grant equivalent (base year 2002, discount rate 6,01 %).
Nominalno znaša 19,100 milijona GBP bruto protivrednosti pomoči z revalorizirano vrednostjo 14,411 milijona GBP bruto protivrednosti pomoči (izhodiščno leto 2002, diskontna stopnja 6,01 %).
Eligible investments amount to GPB 187,760 million in nominal values and to GBP 146,837 million in actualised values.
Naložbe, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za odobritev podpore, znašajo 187,760 milijona GBP v nominalnih vrednostih in 146,837 milijona GBP v revaloriziranih vrednostih.
Therefore, the aid intensity notified by the United Kingdom is 9,81 % gross grant equivalent.
Zato je Združeno kraljestvo kot zgornjo mejo intenzivnosti pomoči prijavilo 9,81 % bruto protivrednosti pomoči.
No other Community aid or financing has been allocated to the project.
Projektu ni bila dodeljena nobena druga pomoč ali financiranje s strani Skupnosti.
GROUNDS FOR INITIATING THE PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA ZAČETEK POSTOPKA
In its decision of 30 April 2003 to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty [4], the Commission expressed doubts on the necessity and proportionality of the proposed aid.
Komisija je v svoji odločbi z dne 30. aprila 2003 o začetku postopka, določenem v členu 88(2) Pogodbe [4], izrazila svoje pomisleke o potrebi in sorazmernosti predlagane pomoči.
In order to allay these doubts, the Commission asked for additional clarifications and documents.
Da bi ublažili te dvome, je Komisija zaprosila za dodatne razjasnitve in dokumente.
Regarding the necessity of the aid, the Commission doubted that Trnava had been considered as a viable alternative to Ryton for the project in question.
Glede potrebe po pomoči je Komisija dvomila, da je bila za zadevni projekt Trnava obravnavana kot izvedljiva alternativa Rytonu.
It requested additional circumstantial evidence, e.g. the location study, to show that the project is actually mobile within the meaning of the car framework.
Zahtevala je dodatne posredne dokaze, tj. študijo o lokaciji, da bi dokazali, da je projekt dejansko mobilen v smislu okvira Skupnosti.
Regarding the proportionality of the aid, the Commission expressed doubts on:
V zvezi s sorazmernostjo pomoči, je Komisija izrazila svoje dvome o:
the exact calculation of the eligible costs,
natančnem izračunu upravičenih stroškov,
the inclusion of investment in vendor tooling within the eligible costs,
vključitvi naložbe v orodja prodajalcev v okviru upravičenih stroškov,
the justification for the higher investment costs for land, buildings, machinery and equipment in Ryton with respect to Trnava,
utemeljitvi višjih investicijskih stroškov za zemljišče, stavbe, stroje in opremo v Rytonu glede Trnave,
the justification for lower operating costs for components and materials in Trnava,
utemeljitvi nižjih obratovalnih stroškov za sestavne dele in materiale v Trnavi,
the exact calculation of redundancy costs in Ryton.
natančnem izračunu redundantnih stroškov v Rytonu.
Finally, the Commission expressed doubts on the calculation of capacity variations put forward by the United Kingdom in the context of the determination of the ‘top-up’.
Nazadnje je Komisija izrazila svoje dvome o izračunu variacij zmogljivosti, ki jih je predložilo Združeno kraljestvo v okviru določanja „dodatne storitve“.
COMMENTS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM
PRIPOMBE S STRANI ZDRUŽENEGA KRALJESTVA
The United Kingdom submitted its comments on the opening of the procedure on 5 September 2003, and additional information on 19 February and 4 May 2004.
Združeno kraljestvo je svoje pripombe k začetku postopka predložilo 5. septembra 2003, dodatne informacije pa 19. februarja in 4. maja 2004.
On the necessity of the aid, the United Kingdom reaffirmed that the project is mobile.
Glede potrebe po pomoči je Združeno kraljestvo znova potrdilo mobilnost projekta.
To that end, the United Kingdom provided documentary evidence showing that Trnava is a viable technical alternative to Ryton for the project.
V ta namen je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo dokumentacijo, iz katere je razvidno, da je Trnava izvedljiva alternativa Rytonu za projekt.
The United Kingdom also provided additional information on the doubts expressed by the Commission in the opening of procedure as regards the proportionality of the aid.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo tudi dodatne informacije v zvezi z dvomi, ki jih je Komisija izrazila na začetku postopka glede sorazmernosti pomoči.
By letter of 5 September 2003, the United Kingdom submitted a new cost-benefit analysis (CBA) that differed from the one initially notified in many important aspects, including higher investment costs in Trnava for machinery and equipment, but lower operating costs in Ryton for labour, and lower operating costs in Trnava for energy and water as well as for inward and outward transport.
S pismom z dne 5. septembra 2003 je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo novo analizo stroškov in koristi (CBA), ki se je od prvotno prijavljene analize razlikovala v številnih pomembnih vidikih, vključno z višjimi investicijskimi stroški v Trnavi za stroje in opremo, nižjimi obratovalnimi stroški v Rytonu za delovno silo ter nižjimi obratovalnimi stroški v Trnavi za energijo in vodo, pa tudi za notranji in zunanji prevoz.
Some of the changes regarded items for which the Commission did not express doubts in the opening of procedure.
Nekatere spremembe so zadevale postavke, o katerih Komisija na začetku postopka ni izrazila dvomov.
With the letter of 19 February 2004, the United Kingdom submitted a new version of the CBA, which was broadly in line with the one of September 2003, with some exceptions (for instance, the figures on labour costs in Ryton and outward transport costs in Trnava were changed back to the initially notified ones).
S pismom z dne 19. februarja 2004 je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo novo različico CBA, ki se je v veliki meri skladala z analizo iz septembra 2003, z nekaterimi izjemami (na primer, podatki o stroških dela v Rytonu in stroških zunanjega prevoza v Trnavi so bili ponovno spremenjeni in so bili enaki prvotno prijavljenim podatkom).
The United Kingdom clarified the items on which the Commission had expressed doubts in the opening of the procedure and the items that were modified after the opening of the procedure.
Združeno kraljestvo je razjasnilo postavke, o katerih je Komisija izrazila svoje dvome na začetku postopka, in postavke, ki so bile spremenjene po začetku postopka.
By letter of 4 May 2004, the United Kingdom communicated to the Commission that the project may not commence until the very end of 2004 or the beginning of 2005.
S pismom z dne 4. maja 2004 je Združeno kraljestvo Komisijo obvestilo, da se projekt ne sme začeti pred koncem leta 2004 ali na začetku leta 2005.
The CBA of February 2004 was amended accordingly, with 2005 as the first year of the investment.
Skladno s tem je bila CBA iz februarja 2004 spremenjena tako, da je leto 2005 prvo leto naložbe.
Regarding the cost of land in Trnava, the United Kingdom claimed that no cost should be included, as the project could be carried out within the existing confines of the site.
V zvezi s stroški zemljišča v Trnavi je Združeno kraljestvo trdilo, da se ne smejo vključiti nobeni stroški, saj bo projekt izveden v okviru obstoječih meja zemljišča.
Indicatively, the project would require 30 hectares of land, whose cost is GBP 0,512 million in actualised values.
Okvirno bi bilo za projekt potrebno zemljišče veliko 30 hektarjev, ki bi stalo 0,512 milijona GBP v revaloriziranih vrednostih.
Regarding the investment costs for buildings, machinery and equipment, the United Kingdom adapted the CBA of February 2004 to take into account the Commission’s remarks.
Združeno kraljestvo je glede investicijskih stroškov za stavbe, stroje in opremo spremenilo CBA iz februarja 2004, da bi upoštevali pripombe Komisije.
While the originally notified CBA only took into account the costs strictly necessary in Trnava in order to accommodate the project, the modified version also takes into account the share of the overall fixed and common costs that can be imputed to the project.
Medtem ko je prvotno prijavljena CBA upoštevala le stroške, ki so v Trnavi nujno potrebni za prilagoditev projekta, spremenjena različica upošteva tudi delež celotnih določenih in splošnih stroškov, ki se lahko prisodijo projektu.
As a consequence, the Trnava alternative results more expensive than the transformation of the Ryton plant.
Zaradi tega se alternativa Trnava izkaže za dražjo, kot je preoblikovanje tovarne Ryton.
Regarding the investment costs for vendor tooling, the United Kingdom affirmed that they have not been considered as eligible costs and they have not been included in the CBA of February 2004, as they will be necessary under both scenarios and therefore would not affect the handicap for Ryton.
V zvezi z investicijskimi stroški za orodja prodajalcev je Združeno kraljestvo znova potrdilo, da jih niso upoštevali kot upravičene stroške in niso bili vključeni v CBA iz februarja 2004, saj so potrebni v obeh možnih potekih in zato ne vplivajo na prikrajšanost Rytona.
Regarding the operating costs for components and materials, the United Kingdom provided copies of PSA’s internal planning document dated May 2003 that reports the component cost differentials between various production sites of the group.
V zvezi z obratovalnimi stroški za sestavne dele in materiale je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo kopije internega načrta PSA iz maja 2003, ki poroča o razlikah stroškov sestavnih delov med različnimi proizvodnimi enotami skupine.
The principal difference between component costs at Ryton and Trnava arise from significantly lower hourly wage rates at Trnava, that translate in lower costs for locally sourced large components such as, for example, bumpers, fascias, seats, door boards and dashboards.
Glavna razlika med stroški sestavnih delov v Rytonu in Trnavi izhaja iz občutno nižje urne cene dela v Trnavi, kar pomeni nižje stroške za velike sestavne dele, ki so lokalno pridobljeni, kot so, na primer, odbijači, blatniki, sedeži in armaturne plošče.
The United Kingdom also provided documents supporting a decrease in the operating costs foreseen in Trnava for energy and water, as well as for inward transport.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo tudi dokazno gradivo za predvideno znižanje obratovalnih stroškov v Trnavi za energijo in vodo, pa tudi za notranji prevoz.
Regarding the inward transport costs, the United Kingdom provided a copy of the update to the internal planning document for the Trnava site, version November 2003, in which the initial cost estimate is reduced to account for a higher estimated share of locally sourced components.
V zvezi z notranjimi prevoznimi stroški je Združeno kraljestvo predložilo kopijo dopolnitve internega načrta za lokacijo Trnava, različico november 2003, v kateri je prvotna ocena stroškov znižana, da bi upravičili višji predviden delež lokalno pridobljenih sestavnih delov.
As regards the redundancy costs, the United Kingdom clarified that they had been taken into account, in the CBA of February 2004, as additional costs to the Trnava solution, similarly to the costs relating to the closure of the Ryton plant.
V zvezi z redundantnimi stroški je Združeno kraljestvo pojasnilo, da so jih upoštevali v CBA iz februarja 2004 kot dodatne stroške k rešitvi Trnava, podobno kot stroške v zvezi z zaprtjem tovarne Ryton.
The United Kingdom also provided more detail on the calculation of these costs.
Združeno kraljestvo je predložilo podrobnosti o izračunu teh stroškov.
Conversely, the United Kingdom did not include any maintenance investment in Ryton in the CBA, as general maintenance investment would have to be carried out in both scenarios.
Nasprotno pa Združeno kraljestvo v CBA ni vključilo vzdrževalnih naložb v Rytonu, saj bi bilo treba splošne vzdrževalne naložbe izvesti v obeh možnih potekih.
Finally, regarding the ‘top-up’, the United Kingdom reaffirmed that the + 2 % factor should be applied to the regional handicap resulting from the CBA of February 2004, because no increase in production will occur as a consequence of the aided project.
Končno, v zvezi z „dodatno storitvijo“ je Združeno kraljestvo znova potrdilo, da se za regionalno prikrajšanost, ki izhaja iz CBA iz februarja 2004, uporablja faktor + 2 %, saj zaradi podprtega projekta ne bo prišlo do povečanja proizvodnje.
V. ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURE
V. PRESOJA UKREPA
The measure notified by the United Kingdom in favour of PCA UK constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Ukrep, ki ga je Združeno kraljestvo prijavilo v prid PCA UK, predstavlja državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe.
It would be financed by the State or through State resources.
Financiran bi bil s strani države ali iz državnih sredstev.
Furthermore, as it constitutes a significant proportion of the funding of the project, the aid is liable to distort competition in the Community by giving PCA UK an advantage over competitors not receiving aid.
Nadalje, ker predstavlja pomemben delež financiranja projekta, lahko pomoč z dajanjem prednosti PCA UK nad konkurenti, ki ne prejemajo pomoči, izkrivlja konkurenco v Skupnosti.
Lastly, there is extensive trade between Member States in the automobile market where PSA is a major player.
Končno, med državami članicami poteka obsežno trgovanje na avtomobilskem trgu, kjer je PSA pomemben udeleženec.