natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, the only known Brazilian producer of PET film cooperated in the investigation and its exports to the Community only represent a negligible part (0,5 %) of all sales to the Community from Brazil during the IP.
Še več, edini znani Brazilski proizvajalec PET filmov je v preiskavi sodeloval in njegov izvoz v skupnost je predstavljal le zanemarljiv delež (0,5 %) vse prodaje v Skupnost iz Brazilije v času OP.
Imports into the Community of PET film from Brazil as reported by Eurostat at CN level, less the imports of goods produced by the cooperating company, increased from 115 tonnes in 1998 (0,2 % of all imports), to over 650 tonnes in 2000 (0,6 %) the year following the imposition of the countervailing measures.
Uvoz PET filma v Skupnost iz Brazilije je po podatkih Eurostata na ravni KN, z odbitkom uvoza blaga, ki ga proizvajajo sodelujoče družbe, narasel iz 115 ton v letu 1998 (0.2 % skupnega uvoza) na več kot 650 ton v letu 2000 (0,6 %), v letu po uvedbi izravnalnih ukrepov.
Over 1200 tonnes (1,4 %) were imported in 2001 increasing to just over 2500 tonnes (3,2 %) in 2002 and remaining at just over 2000 tonnes during the IP (2,4 % of total PET film imports).
Leta 2001 je bilo uvoženih več kot 1200 ton (1,4 %), leta 2002 pa je uvoz znašal nekoliko več kot 2500 ton (3,2 %). V OP je obtičal na nekoliko več kot 2000 tonah (2,4 % skupnega uvoza PET filma).
The sole cooperating company in Brazil, Terphane, is, as noted above (see recital 22), the only known producer of PET film in Brazil.
Edina sodelujoča družba v Braziliji, Terphane, je, kot je omenjeno zgoraj (glej uvodno izjavo (22)), edini znani proizvajalec PET filma v Braziliji.
This company only exported a single consignment of 10,6 tonnes of PET film to the Community during the IP.
Ta družba je med OP izvozila eno samo pošiljko v obsegu 10,6 ton PET filma v Skupnost.
Apart from a sample sold in 2002, this was the company’s first export of PET film to the Community.
Razen vzorca, prodanega leta 2002, je bil to prvi izvoz PET filma te družbe v Skupnost.
The company does not therefore appear to be responsible for the volumes of PET film entering the Community from Brazil in the period 1998 to 2003 (recital 23 above).
Zato ni mogoče predvidevati, da je družba odgovorna za obseg PET filma, ki vstopa v Skupnost iz Brazilije v obdobju 1998 do 2003 (uvodna izjava (23) zgoraj).
Imports into the Community of PET film from Israel as reported by Eurostat at CN level, less the imports of goods produced by the cooperating company, declined between 1998 and 1999 from 1100 tonnes to just under 1000 tonnes in 1999 (1,3 % of total PET film imports) but then increased to 3000 tonnes in 2000 (3,7 % of total imports) and to 3400 tonnes in 2001 (4,1 % of total PET film imports).
Uvoz PET filma v Skupnost iz Izraela po podatkih Eurostata na ravni KN, brez upoštevanja uvoza blaga, ki ga proizvaja sodelujoča družba, je med leti 1998 in 1999 upadel z 1100 ton na nekoliko manj kot 1000 ton v letu 1999 (1,3 % skupnega uvoza PET filma), nato pa je ponovno porasel na 3000 ton v letu 2000 (3,7 % skupnega uvoza) ter na 3400 ton v letu 2001 (4,1 % skupnega uvoza PET filma).
Volumes continued to rise to just over 4200 tonnes in 2002 (5,1 % of imports) and to over 4400 tonnes in 2003 (5,3 % of imports).
Obseg uvoza se je še naprej povečeval in narasel na nekoliko več kot 4200 ton v letu 2002 (5,1 % uvoza) ter na več kot 4400 ton v letu 2003 (5,3 % uvoza).
A small number of converters of PET film are located in Israel but the information received within the time-limits indicated that, even cumulatively, it is unlikely that they would have had sufficient capacity to be responsible for the volumes of film entering the Community from Israel in the period 2000 to 2003.
V Izraelu se nahaja majhno število konverterjev PET filma, vendar podatki, pridobljeni v roku kažejo, da je neverjetno, da bi tudi vsi skupaj imeli zadostne zmogljivosti, da bi lahko povzročili tolikšen obseg filma, ki je vstopal v Skupnost iz Izraela v obdobju od 2000 do 2003.
Official Indian export data shows an initial decrease in exports to Israel from 53 tonnes in 1998 to 44 tonnes in 1999.
Uradni indijski izvozni podatki kažejo na začeten upad izvoza v Izrael s 53 ton leta 1998 na 44 v letu 1999.
The sole cooperating company in Israel, Jolybar, slits, sheets and converts purchased PET film and sells it as products which fall under the same CN codes as the product concerned, but is generally not of Indian origin and therefore it can not be considered to be the product concerned.
Edina sodelujoča družba v Izraelu, Jolybar, razrezuje, valja in preoblikuje PET film ter ga prodaja kot izdelek, ki je zajet pod isto oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek, vendar pa v glavnem ni indijskega porekla, torej se ne more smatrati za zadevni izdelek.
The company has been supplying PET film to the Community since the 1990s.
Družba dobavlja PET film v Skupnost od 1990-tih.
The quantities of PET film exported by Jolybar to the Community doubled between 1999 and 2003 (the IP).
Količine PET filma, ki jih izvaža Jolybar v Skupnost, so se v letih 1999 do 2003 podvojile (OP).
Irrespective as to whether this development of exports indicates a change in the company's pattern of trade this issue was not considered further as there was, in any event, a clear economic justification for this behaviour as set out in recital 31.
Ne glede na to, ali nakazuje razvoj izvoza spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja družbe ali ne, se zadeva ni nadalje obravnavala, saj je v vsakem primeru obstajala nedvomna ekonomska upravičenost za tako vedenje, kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (31) v nadaljevanju.
In view of the above, and in particular given the coincidence between the rise of imports from Brazil and Israel and the entry into force in 1999, of the countervailing measures on PET film originating in India, a change in the pattern of trade is established in respect of exports of PET film from India, Israel and Brazil.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega, ter še posebej zaradi sovpadanja porasta uvoza iz Brazilije in Izraela ter začetkom veljavnosti izravnalnih ukrepov za PET film s poreklom iz Indije v letu 1999, se ugotavlja sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja za izvoz PET filma iz Indije, Izraela in Brazilije.
INSUFFICIENT DUE CAUSE OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION
POMANJKANJE UPRAVIČENEGA RAZLOGA ALI EKONOMSKE UPRAVIČENOSTI
Non-cooperating exporting producers
Nesodelujoči proizvajalci-izvozniki
In the absence of any other cooperation and given that the abovementioned change in the pattern of trade for Brazil took place following the imposition of countervailing duties, it has to be concluded, on the basis of the information available and in the absence of any other explanation, that the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the imposition of the duty rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja ter ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih sprememb v vzorcu trgovanja Brazilije po uvedbi izravnalnih dajatev je potrebno sklepati, na osnovi podatkov, ki so na voljo, ter ker ni drugih razlag, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročila uvedba dajatve, in ne drugi upravičeni vzroki ali ekonomska upravičenost v smislu člena 23(1) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of cooperation and given that the abovementioned change in the pattern of trade took place following the imposition of countervailing duties it has to be concluded, on the basis of the information available and in the absence of any other explanation, that the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the imposition of the duty rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi nesodelovanja ter ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih sprememb v vzorcu trgovanja po uvedbi izravnalnih dajatev je potrebno sklepati, na osnovi podatkov, ki so na voljo, ter ker ni drugih razlag, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročila uvedba dajatve, in ne drugi upravičeni vzroki ali ekonomska upravičenost v smislu člena 23(1) osnovne uredbe.
Cooperating exporting producer
Sodelujoči proizvajalec-izvoznik
The investigation established that Jolybar’s export trade to the Community is long established and the film supplied to the Community is manufactured by the company in facilities established before the entry into force of the measures on Indian PET film.
Preiskava je pokazala, da ima družba Jolybar ustaljeno izvozno trgovanje s Skupnostjo, in da film, ki ga dobavlja v Skupnost, proizvaja v obratih, ustanovljenih pred začetkom veljavnosti ukrepov za indijski PET film.
The company explained that as a general rule it does not supply Indian film to Community customers since the latter prefer the qualities of European film as a base material for treatment by Jolybar.
Družba je pojasnila, da je njihovo splošno pravilo, da ne dobavlja indijskega filma strankam v Skupnosti, saj dajejo slednji prednost kakovosti evropskega filma kot osnovnega materiala, ki ga obdeluje Jolybar.
Exceptionally, during the IP, a quantity of approximately one tonne of Indian film was shipped to one Community customer as part of a larger consignment which the customer required urgently.
Izjemoma je bila v OP poslana stranki v Skupnosti približna količina ene tone indijskega filma kot del večje pošiljke, ki jo je stranka nujno potrebovala.
It is therefore concluded that there is sufficient economic justification for the development of Jolybar’s exports, which is in line with its activities in the Community market in respect of PET film manufactured by them.
Zato se sklepa, da obstaja ekonomska upravičenost za razvoj izvoza družbe Jolybar, ki je glede PET filma ki ga proizvajajo, v skladu z dejavnostmi družbe na tržišču Skupnosti.
UNDERMINING OF THE REMEDIAL EFFECTS OF THE DUTY IN TERMS OF THE PRICES AND/OR THE QUANTITIES OF THE LIKE PRODUCT
OSLABITEV POPRAVLJALNEGA UČINKA DAJATEV V SMISLU CEN IN/ALI KOLIČIN PODOBNIH IZDELKOV
The figures in recitals 20 to 28 indicate that a clear quantitative change in the pattern of Community imports of the product concerned occurred since the imposition of measures in 1999.
Številke v uvodnih izjavah (20) do (28) nakazujejo, da obstaja jasna količinska sprememba v vzorcu uvažanja zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost, ki se je pojavila po uvedbi ukrepov v letu 1999.
There was a decrease in Indian imports to the Community at the time of the imposition of the measures, from 11700 tonnes in 1998 to 10600 tonnes in 1999 (9 %).
Zaznan je bil upad indijskega uvoza v Skupnost v času uvedbe ukrepov z 11700 ton v letu 1998 na 10600 ton v letu 1999 (9 %).
Increases in exports of the product concerned to the Community from Brazil and Israel surged from 1999 to 2000, from cumulatively less than 1000 tonnes to over 3500 tonnes.
Porast izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost iz Brazilije in Izraela se je od leta 1999 do leta 2000 dvigovala, od skupaj manj kot 1000 ton na preko 3500 ton.
Eurostat data indicate that, from 1998 until the end of IP, the increases in imports to the Community amounted to 1900 tonnes from Brazil and 3500 tonnes from Israel.
Podatki Eurostata nakazujejo, da je porast uvoza v Skupnost od leta 1998 do konca OP količinsko znašal 1900 ton iz Brazilije in 3500 ton iz Izraela.
Exports from India, which fell after the imposition of countervailing measures and fell again after the imposition of anti-dumping measures, have since recovered to the levels before countervailing measures were imposed.
Izvoz iz Indije, ki je po uvedbi izravnalnih ukrepov upadel, ter ki je po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov ponovno upadel, se je od takrat popravil na stopnjo, preden so bili uvedeni izravnalni ukrepi.
It is therefore considered that part of the export trade flows from India have been first compensated, and later supplemented, by export flows through Brazil and Israel thus undermining the remedial effects of the measures in terms of the quantities imported into the Community market.
Zato se smatra, da je bil del izvoznih trgovinskih tokov iz Indije najprej kompenziran, in nato nadomeščen z izvoznimi tokovi preko Brazilije in Izraela, ter da je bil popravljalni učinek ukrepov v smislu količine, uvožene na trg Skupnosti, oslabljen.
With regard to prices of the product concerned consigned from Brazil and from Israel, in view of the low cooperation, it was necessary to refer to Eurostat data, which was the best evidence available.
Ob upoštevanju cene zadevnega izdelka, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, in glede na nizko stopnjo sodelovanja, je bilo potrebno uporabiti podatke iz Eurostata, ki so najboljši dokaz, ki je na voljo.
The average price of imports of PET film from Brazil during the IP, adjusted for post-import costs, was around 67 % of the injury elimination level established in the investigation which led to the imposition of countervailing measures.
Povprečna cena uvoza PET filma iz Brazilije v času OP, s prilagoditvijo stroškov po uvozu, je bila približno 67 % stopnje odprave škode, ugotovljene v preiskavi, po kateri so bili vpeljani izravnalni ukrepi.
On this basis, there is evidence that PET films consigned from Brazil also undermined the remedial effects of the duty imposed in terms of prices.
Na tej osnovi obstaja dokaz, da tudi PET film, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije, slabi popravljalni učinek dajatve na ceno izdelka.
The average price of imports of PET film from Israel during the IP, adjusted for post-import costs, was around 75 % of the injury elimination level established in the original anti-subsidy investigation.
Povprečna cena uvoza PET filma iz Brazilije v času OP, s prilagoditvijo stroškov po uvozu, je bila približno 75 % stopnje odprave škode, ugotovljene v izvorni protisubvencijski preiskavi.
On this basis, there is evidence that the Israeli imports also undermined the remedial effects of the duty imposed in terms of prices.
Na tej osnovi obstaja dokaz, da uvoz iz Izraela slabi popravljalni učinek dajatve na ceno izdelka.
It is therefore concluded that the imports of PET film from Brazil and from Israel undermined the remedial effects of the countervailing measures both in terms of quantities and prices.
Zato je mogoče zaključiti, da uvoz PET filma iz Brazilije in iz Izraela slabi popravljalni učinek izravnalnih ukrepov v smislu količine in cene.
EVIDENCE OF CONTINUED SUBSIDISATION OF THE PRODUCT CONCERNED
DOKAZ O NEPREKINJENEM SUBVENCIONIRANJU ZADEVNEGA IZDELKA
The original investigation identified that Indian companies benefited from the following subsidies: Duty entitlement passbook (pre-export), Duty entitlement passbook (post-export) (DEPB), Export promotion capital goods scheme (EPCG) and Export promotion zones/Export oriented units (EPZ/EOU) schemes as well as certain regional schemes.
Izvorna preiskava je identificirala indijske družbe, ki so imele korist od naslednjih subvencij: shema „Duty Entitlement Passbook“ (na osnovi pred izvozom), shema „Duty Entitlement Passbook“ (na osnovi po izvozu) („DEPB“), shema „Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme“ („EPCG“) in shema „Export Promotion Zones/Export Oriented Units“ („EPZ/EOU“), kot tudi nekatere regijske sheme.
The Indian Government submitted information indicating that the DEPB (post-export) and EPCG schemes continued to be used, but that the companies concerned were not located in areas where they could benefit from SEZ/EPZ, the successor scheme to EPZ/EOU.
Indijska vlada je posredovala podatke, ki nakazujejo, da se shemi DEPB (na osnovi po izvozu) in EPCG še naprej uporabljata, da pa se zadevne družbe ne nahajajo na območjih, kjer bi lahko imele korist od sheme SEZ/EPZ, naslednice sheme EPZ/EOU.
No information was received in respect of the regional schemes.
O regijskih shemah niso bili prejeti nikakršni podatki.
Five of the six cooperating companies confirmed having received funds through one or both of the DEPB and EPCG schemes The remaining company refused to provide information unless the Commission agreed to recalculate the level of subsidy.
Pet od šestih sodelujočih družb je potrdilo, da je prejelo sredstva od shem DEPB in EPCG. Ostale družbe pa so zavrnile posredovanje podatkov, razen če bi se Komisija strinjala s preračunanjem stopnje subvencije.
One of the companies considered that the subsidies were not countervailable.
Ena izmed družb je menila, da subvencije niso izravnalne.
It should be noted that Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation does not require that it is shown that the subsidies received continue to be countervailable, nor that the level of the subsidies should be recalculated.
Potrebno je omeniti, da člen 23(1) osnovne uredbe ne zahteva, da se prejete subvencije še naprej izkazujejo kot izravnalne, niti da je potrebno preračunati stopnjo subvencije.
It was found that at least some of the subsidy schemes identified during the original investigation as countervailable were still in place and that most cooperating Indian exporters benefited from them.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so vsaj nekatere subvencijske sheme, med izvorno preiskavo identificirane kot izravnalne, še vedno v veljavi, in da je večina sodelujočih indijskih proizvajalcev imela od njih korist.
In the absence of cooperation, it must be assumed that any other exporting producer would equally benefit from such subsidies.
Zaradi nesodelovanja je potrebno sklepati, da bi vsi drugi proizvajalci-izvozniki imeli enako korist od teh subvencij.
Accordingly, it is concluded that the exported like product still benefits from the subsidy as required by Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation for the purpose of extending the countervailing duties to imports of the like product from third countries.
V skladu s tem je bilo zaključeno, da imajo izvoženi enaki izdelki še vedno korist od subvencij v skladu s členom 23(1) temeljne uredbe za razširitve izravnalnih dajatev na uvoz enakih izdelkov iz tretjih držav.
As stated in recitals 24 and 27, these companies cooperated in the investigation, by submitting a questionnaire reply and accepting a verification visit.
Kot je navedeno v izjavah (24) in (27), sta ti dve družbi sodelovali v preiskavi tako, da sta posredovali odgovora na vprašalnik in dovolili preveritveni obisk.
By Regulation (EC) No 1830/2004 [13], the Commission amended the initiating Regulation in order to cease registration of imports of PET film from Terphane and Jolybar which were found not to be circumventing the countervailing duties.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1830/2004 [13] je Komisija spremenila uvajalno uredbo z namenom odpraviti registracijo za uvoz PET filma od družb Terphane in Jolybar, za kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da se ne izogibata izravnalnim dajatvam.
In accordance with the above findings that Terphane and Jolybar were found not to have circumvented the countervailing measures in force, these companies should also be exempted from the extension of the measures envisaged.
V skladu z zgoraj navedenimi ugotovitvami, po katerih je bilo za družbi Terphane in Jolybar ugotovljeno, da se ne izogibata veljavnim izravnalnim ukrepom, se ti dve družbi izvzameta od predvidenih razširjenih ukrepov.
In view of the findings above, it is found that circumvention has taken place within the meaning of Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation.
V okviru zgornjih ugotovitev je bilo ugotovljeno, da se vrši izogibanje v smislu člena 23(1) osnovne uredbe.
In accordance with Article 23(1) of the basic Regulation, the existing countervailing measures on imports of the product concerned (i.e. PET film originating in India) should be extended to imports of PET film consigned from Brazil or Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not with the exception of those manufactured by Terphane and by Jolybar.
V skladu s členom 23(1) osnovne uredbe se obstoječi izravnalni ukrepi na uvoz zadevnih izdelkov (tj. PET filma s poreklom iz Indije) razširijo na uvoz PET filma, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije ali Izraela, ne glede na to, ali so deklarirani kot s poreklom v Braziliji ali Izraelu ali ne, z izjemo tistih, ki jih proizvajata družbi Terphane in Jolybar.
In accordance with Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, which provides that measures shall be applied against registered imports from the date of registration, the countervailing duty should be collected on imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and consigned from Israel which entered the Community under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation with the exception of imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and produced by Terphane and those consigned from Israel and produced by Jolybar.
V skladu s členom 24(5) osnovne uredbe, ki določa uporabo ukrepov za registriran uvoz od datuma registracije, se za uvoz PET filma, poslanega iz Brazilije in poslanega iz Izraela, ki vstopa v Skupnost z registracijo, ki jo je uvedla uvajalna uredba, z izjemo uvoza PET filma, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in ki ga proizvaja družba Terphane ter ki se pošilja iz Izraela in ki ga proizvaja družba Jolybar, uporabi izravnalna dajatev.
The exemptions from the extended measures granted to PET film produced by Jolybar and to Terphane shall, in accordance with Article 23(3) of the basic Regulation, remain valid under the requirement that it is not established that the exemption was granted on the basis of false or misleading information submitted by the companies concerned.
Izvzetost od razširjenih ukrepov se odobri za PET film, ki ga proizvajata družbi Jolybar in Terphane, bo v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe ostala v veljavi, če se ne ugotovi, da je bila izvzetost odobrena na osnovi napačnih ali zavajajočih podatkov, ki sta jih posredovali zadevni družbi.
Should prima facie evidence indicate otherwise, an investigation may be initiated by the Commission to establish if withdrawal of the exemption is warranted.
V primeru, da bi verjetni dokazi nakazovali drugače, lahko Komisija vpelje preiskavo, s katero bi utemeljila upravičenost preklica izvzetosti.
The non-extension of the duties to the imports of PET film from Terphane and Jolybar was established on the basis of the findings of the present investigation.
Na osnovi ugotovitev sedanje preiskave se dajatev na uvoz PET filma ne razširi na družbi Terphane in Jolybar. Ta izjema se uporablja izključno za uvoz PET filma, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije ali iz Izraela, in ki ga proizvajata navedena pravna subjekta.
This non-extension is thus exclusively applicable to imports of PET film consigned from Brazil or Israel, respectively, and produced by these specific legal entities.
Uvožen PET film, ki ga proizvajajo katere koli druge družbe, ki niso izrecno navedene v izvedbenem delu uredbe z imenom in naslovom, vključno s subjekti, ki so povezani s posebej navedenimi subjekti, od teh izjem nimajo koristi.
Imported PET film produced or consigned by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from the exemption and should be subject to the residual duty rate as imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999.
Zanje se bo uporabljala preostala carinska stopnja, ki jo nalaga Uredba (ES) št. 2597/1999.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Council intended to extend the definitive countervailing duty in force and were given the opportunity to comment and to be heard.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in razmislekih, na podlagi katerih je nameraval Svet razširiti veljavno dokončno izravnalno dajatev, in dana jim je bila priložnost, da podajo pripombe in zahtevajo zaslišanje.
The Israeli authorities reiterated those comments made by the Indian Government, indicated in recital 10.
Izraelski organi so ponovili pripombe indijske vlade, ki so navedene v uvodni izjavi (10).
A list of Israeli converters of PET film which had exported to the European Community during 2003 and 2004 was also submitted.
Seznam izraelskih konverterjev PET filma, ki so izvažali v Evropsko skupnost v letih 2003 in 2004, je bil tudi posredovan.
However, as these companies had not cooperated within the time limits, they could not be exempted from the extension of the measures to Israel,
Vendar, ker te družbe niso sodelovale v roku, ne morejo biti izvzete iz razširitve ukrepov za Izrael –