natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The insolvency plans that were approved in the procedures of Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG contained the following operational measures for the restoration of the Group’s viability: reduction of the firm’s overcapacity, sale of factory sites, closing down of subsidiaries, improvement of negative financial results, reduction and optimisation of costs.
Stečajna načrta, ki sta bila odobrena v postopkih proti Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG, sta predvidevala naslednje operativne ukrepe za obnovitev rentabilnosti Skupine: zmanjšanje presežnih kapacitet, prodajo tovarniškega zemljišča, zaprtje hčerinskih družb, izboljšavo negativnih finančnih rezultatov, zmanjšanje in optimizacijo stroškov.
The activities of the group were to be reduced to the still healthy core business.
Dejavnosti Skupine naj bi bile omejene na še zdravo jedro dejavnosti.
The Herlitz Group’s development has been in accordance with the financial plans forming part of the insolvency plans.
Razvoj Skupine Herlitz je potekal v skladu s finančnimi načrti, ki so bili sestavni del stečajnih načrtov.
As a result, in the financial year 2003 the group had an operating profit before interest and financing payments of EUR 7,2 million and a total turnover of EUR 346,6 million. On the basis of these figures for 2003 the operating margin disregarding interest and financing payments (Umsatzrendite vor Finanzierungsaufwendungen) is 2 %, which corresponds to the average in the sector.
Skupina je tako v poslovnem letu 2003 pred obrestmi in zneski financiranja ustvarila dobiček iz poslovanja v višini 7,2 milijona EUR ob celotnem prihodku v višini 346,6 milijona EUR. V letu 2003 je donos od prihodkov pred izdatki za financiranje znašal 2 %, kar ustreza povprečju tega sektorja.
The operating cash flow before interest and financing costs for 2003 is approximately EUR 14 million.
Operativni denarni tok je leta 2003 pred izdatki za financiranje znašal okoli 14 milijonov EUR.
For 2004, the expectations of the Herlitz Group are an operating profit before interest and financing payments of EUR [5-10] * million and output [28] (sales and changes in inventory of finished products) of EUR [250-300] * million. This will lead to an operating margin disregarding interest and financing payments of [2-4] * %.
Za leto 2004 Skupina Herlitz načrtuje dobiček iz poslovanja pred izdatki za financiranje v višini [5–10] * milijonov EUR in prihodke iz poslovanja [28] (prodaja, sprememba zalog pri končnih izdelkih) v višini [250–300] * milijonov EUR. To bo prineslo donos iz prihodkov pred izdatki za financiranje v višini [2–4] * %.
The actual results until now have borne out the Herlitz Group’s expectations.
Z dosedanjim potekom so bila pričakovanja Skupine Herlitz izpolnjena.
Therefore, based on the above, the insolvency plans have laid the foundation for the restoration of the Herlitz Group’s viability.
Pod temi pogoji sta stečajna načrta postavila temelje za ponovno vzpostavitev rentabilnosti Skupine Herlitz.
Aid limited to the minimum
Pomoč, omejena na minimalno vsoto
The Herlitz Group had already carried out restructuring measures before the insolvency proceedings. The estimated costs of the restructuring were around EUR 20,6 million, consisting of EUR 9,3 million for severance payments, EUR 6,2 million for depreciation and impairments and EUR 5,1 million for moving, closure and advisory costs.
Skupina Herlitz je že pred začetkom stečajnih postopkov izvedla ukrepe za prestrukturiranje, katerih stroški so znašali okoli 20,6 milijona EUR, od tega 9,3 milijona EUR za odpravnine, 6,2 milijona EUR za amortizacijo in zmanjšanje vrednosti ter 5,1 milijona EUR za stroške preselitve, ustavitev poslovanja in svetovanje.
As regards the costs directly related to the restructuring measures adopted in the insolvency proceedings in 2002, these amounted to EUR 6,9 million (severance payments and costs of the insolvency proceedings).
Neposredni stroški za ukrepe za prestrukturiranje, predvidene v stečajnih načrtih leta 2002, so znašali 6,9 milijona EUR (odpravnine in stroški stečajnih postopkov).
The majority of the restructuring costs were undertaken by the firm and its creditors.
Večino stroškov za prestrukturiranje so poravnali podjetje in njegovi upniki.
The shareholders of the group have contributed by not taking any dividends since 1997.
Delničarji so prispevali tako, da od leta 1997 niso prejemali nobenih dividend.
The positive cash-flows were reinvested in the group.
Vsak pozitiven denarni tok je bil investiran nazaj v Skupino.
At the beginning of the insolvency proceedings the bank consortium provided the group with a ‘new’ liquidity loan of EUR 15 million that was twice prolonged (renewed) until 17 November 2003, when it was fully repaid.
Na začetku stečajnega postopka je bančni konzorcij Skupini zagotovil „novo“ likvidnostno posojilo v višini 15 milijonov EUR, ki so ga dvakrat obnovili, 17. novembra 2003 pa je bilo v celoti vrnjeno.
Apart from this fresh loan, the banks have also prolonged the duration of their existing and non-waived credits for another year in March 2004.
Poleg novega posojila so banke marca 2004 podaljšale rok odplačila za obstoječe kredite za eno leto.
If we accept the restructuring costs covering the period before the insolvency proceedings, the own contribution exceeds 95 % of EUR 27,5 million. Alternatively, if we take into account the costs directly connected to the insolvency proceedings, the own contribution amounts to 83,01 % of EUR 6,9 million. Given the significant own contribution in both cases, the restructuring aid can be considered to be limited to the minimum.
Pri stroških za prestrukturiranje za časovno obdobje pred začetkom stečajnih postopkov lastni prispevek presega 95 % od 27,5 milijona EUR. Če upoštevamo vse stroške, ki so povezani s stečajnimi postopki, znaša lastni prispevek 83,01 % od 6,9 milijona EUR. Zaradi znatnega lastnega prispevka v obeh primerih je pomoč za prestrukturiranje omejena na minimalno vsoto.
Avoidance of undue distortions of competition
Preprečevanje nedopustnega izkrivljanja konkurence
The following definitive compensatory measures in the form of capacity limitations were undertaken by the Herlitz Group: closing down three envelope machines; sale of an offset printing machine and a napkin machine; abandoning of the injection moulding production area; closing down or sale of subsidiaries in Portugal, Austria and France; reduction of storage capacity and reduction of personnel by 630 employees.
Skupina Herlitz je izvedla naslednje dokončne izravnalne ukrepe v obliki omejitve kapacitet: ustavitev treh strojev za izdelavo pisemskih ovojnic, prodaja stroja za ofsetni tisk in stroja za zlaganje prtičkov; opustitev proizvodnje strojev za brizgalno vlivanje v kalupe; zaprtje ali prodaja hčerinskih družb na Portugalskem, v Avstriji in Franciji, zmanjšanje skladiščnih prostorov in zmanjšanje števila zaposlenih za 630 oseb.
During the restructuring period, the group acquired control over its former joint venture eCom for EUR […] * million, the company Mercoline for EUR […] * million and it bought back some assets in the liquidation of its subsidiaries for EUR […] * million. [The sum of the three figures in this paragraph is EUR 1-3 million] The amounts paid were relatively small, the function of these companies and assets fits into the aim of reducing costs, focusing on the core business and concentrating the logistical and administrative functions.
V času prestrukturiranje je Skupina Herlitz prevzela nadzor nad nekdanjim skupnim podjetjem eCom za […] * milijonov EUR in nad družbo Mercoline za […] * milijonov EUR. Poleg tega je ob likvidaciji svoje hčerinske družbe kupila nazaj nekaj premoženja v višini […] * milijonov EUR. [Vsota treh zneskov, omenjenih v tem odstavku, znaša 1–3 milijonov EUR.] Ti plačani zneski so bili nizki, funkcije pridobljenih družb in premoženja pa so v skladu s ciljem zniževanja stroškov, osredotočanjem na jedro dejavnosti ter združitvijo logističnih in upravnih funkcij.
Therefore, the Commission accepts that these investments were essential for restoring viability without unduly distorting competition.
Komisija zato te investicije šteje kot bistvene za obnovitev rentabilnosti brez nedopustnega izkrivljanja konkurence.
There is no overcapacity on the relevant markets. The Herlitz Group has an approximate share of [5-15 %] * in Germany and [3-17 %] * in the EU.
Na pomembnih trgih, kjer ima Skupina Herlitz [5–15 %] * delež v Nemčiji in [3–17 %] * delež v Skupnosti, ni presežnih kapacitet.
Given the small market share and the small amount of state aid, the additional investments could be regarded as necessary and not representing undue distortions.
Zaradi majhnega tržnega deleža in nizkega zneska državne pomoči je dodatne investicije mogoče označiti kot nujne, ki pa ne povzročajo nedopustnega izkrivljanja konkurence.
In conclusion, the restructuring aid fulfils the criteria of the Guidelines and is compatible with the common market.
Pomoč za prestrukturiranje s tem izpolnjuje kriterije smernic in je združljiva s skupnim trgom.
In view of the above, the Commission comes to the conclusion that the rescue aid and the restructuring aid comply with the conditions set out in the Guidelines and are therefore compatible with the common market,
Pod temi pogoji je Komisija sklenila, da sanacijska pomoč in pomoč za prestrukturiranje izpolnjujeta pogoje smernic in da sta združljivi s skupnim trgom –
The State aid in the form of rescue aid and restructuring aid which Germany has implemented for the Herlitz Group is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Državna pomoč Nemčije v obliki sanacijske pomoči in pomoči za prestrukturiranje za Skupino Herlitz je v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES združljiva s skupnim trgom.
OJ C 100, 26.4.2003, p. 3.
UL C 100, 26.4.2003, str. 3.
On 1 July 2003 the Berliner Bank became a subsidiary of Landesbank Berlin.
julija 2003 je Berliner Bank postala hčerinska banka Landesbank Berlin.
See the website of the Herlitz Group: http://www.herlitz.de/index.php?id=347&backPID=348&begin_at=5&pS=1041375600&pL=31535999&arc=1&tt_news=81
Glej spletno stran Skupine Herlitz: http://www.herlitz.de/index.php?id=347&backPID=348&begin_at=5&pS=1041375600&pL=31535999&arc=1&tt_news=81
All figures refer to the status at the end of each indicated year or period except where average is indicated.
Vse številke označujejo stanje ob koncu vsakega navedenega leta ali obdobja, razen kjer je navedeno povprečje.
See paragraph 290 of the German Commercial Code, Handelsgesetzbuch of 10 May 1897 (RGBl. I S. 219).
Glej člen 290 nemškega trgovinskega zakonika z dne 10. maja 1897 (RGBL I S. 219).
Substantive error.
Napaka redakcije.
Insolvenzordnung of 5 October 1994, (BGB II 1994, 2866).
Stečajni zakon z dne 5. oktobra 1994 (BGB II 1994, 2866).
See recital 42.
Glej uvodno izjavo 42.
The only exception was that Herlitz PBS AG received a compensation payment of EUR 1 million for the termination of an affiliation agreement between Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG.
Edina izjema je bila, da je Herlitz PBS AG za prekinitev sporazuma o združitvi med Herlitzom AG in Herlitzom PBS AG prejel denarno nadomestilo v višini 1 milijona EUR.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Del tega besedila je bil urejen tako, da zagotovi, da se ne razkrije zaupnih informacij; ti deli so v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
This amount results after discounting double claims made against Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG.
Ta znesek je posledica obračuna dvojnega zahtevka, ki je bil uveden proti Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG.
See note (a).
Glej opombo (a).
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 11 July 2002 case T-152/99, Hijos de Andrés Molina, SA (HAMSA) v Commission of the European Communities [2002] ECR II-3049.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. julija 2002 v zadevi T-152/99, Hijos de Andrés Molina, SA (HAMSA) proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2002] PSES II-3049.
Judgment of the Court of 16 May 2002 case C-482/99, French Republic v Commission of the European Communities [2002] ECR I-4397.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v zadevi C-482/99, Francoska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2002] PSES I-4397.
BGBl. 1996-I S. 1254.
Nemški civilni zakonik, 1996-I, str. 1254.
Judgment of the Court of 13 March 2001 Case C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG v Schleswag AG, in the presence of Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH and Land Schleswig-Holstein [2001] ECR I-2099, paragraph 58.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. marca 2001 v zadevi C-379/98, PreussenElektra AG v prisotnosti Windpark Reußenköge III GmbH in dežele Schleswig-Holstein [2001] PSES I-2099, odstavek 58.
Judgment of the Court of 29 April 1999 in Case C-342/96, Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraphs 5 and 46.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 29. aprila 1999 v zadevi C-342/99, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1999] PSES I-2459, odstavka 5 in 46.
See HAMSA v Commission, loc. cit., paragraphs 167 to 170; Spain v Commission, loc. cit, paragraph 46; and Judgment of the Court of 29 June 1999 in Case C-256/97 Déménagements-Manutention Transport SA (DM), [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraph 24.
Glej HAMSA proti Komisiji, odstavki 167–170; Španija proti Komisiji, odstavek 46; sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 29. junija 1999 v zadevi C-256/97, Déménagement-Manutention Transport SA (DM) [1999] PSES, I-3913, odstavek 24.
See Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 March 2003 Joined cases T-228/99 and T-233/99 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission of the European Communities [2003] ECR II-435, paragraph 272; Judgment of the Court of 28 January 2003 Case C-334/99 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities [2003] ECR I-1139, paragraph 134; Judgment of the Court of 14 September 1994 Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [1994] I-4103, paragraph 22.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 6. marca 2003 v povezanih zadevah T-228/99 in T-233/99, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale in dežela Severno Porenje – Vestfalija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [2003] PSES II-435, odstavek 272; sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 28. januarja 2003 v zadevi C-334/99, Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [2003] PSES I-1139, odstavek 134; sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 14. septembra 1994 v povezanih zadevah C-278/92 in C-279/92 in C-280/92, Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, [1994] PSES I-4103, odstavek 22.
See point 101 of the Guidelines.
Glej točko 101 smernic.
See the ILB’s website: www.ilb.de
Spletna stran ILB: www.ilb.de
The reference rate adopted by the Commission for Germany was 5,06 % from 1.1.2002 and 4,8 % from 1.1.2003, see http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html
Referenčna obrestna mera Komisije za Nemčijo je od 1.1.2002 znašala 5,06 %, od 1.1.2003 pa 4,8 %, glej http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html
On 8 August 2002 the Commission asked for clarifications on the aid granted.
Komisija je 8. avgusta 2002 zaprosila za pojasnilo glede odobrene pomoči.
Germany sent additional information by letter dated 4 September 2002, registered as received on the same day.
Nemčija je v dopisu z dne 4. septembra 2002, evidentiranim istega dne, posredovala dodatna pojasnila.
Creditors of Herlitz AG (public or private creditor)
Upniki Herlitza AG (javni in zasebni)
Firstly, the credit agreement of 10 May 2002 was concluded between the insolvency administrator and Herlitz PBS AG.
Prvič, sporazum o kreditu z dne 10. maja 2002 je bil sklenjen med stečajnim upraviteljem in Herlitzom PBS AG.
Secondly, Germany pointed out that FOP could not be regarded as the de facto beneficiary either because FOP only received due payments in accordance with its supply contract with Herlitz PBS AG.
Drugič, FOP ni mogoče označiti kot dejanskega upravičenca, saj je prejel zgolj zapadla plačila v skladu z dobavnim sporazumom s Herlitzom PBS AG.
See Gesetz zur Verbesserung der betrieblichen Altersversorgung, (BetrAVG) of 19 December 1974 (BGBl.
BetrAVG z dne 19. decembra 1974.
I S. 3610).
Nemški civilni zakonik, I str. 3610.
Finally, by letter dated 17 July 2002, registered as received on 19 July 2002, Germany informed the Commission that the Investment Bank of the Land of Brandenburg (InvestitionsBank des Landes Brandenburg, hereinafter referred to as ILB) had granted Herlitz PBS AG a loan of some EUR 1 million. According to the information provided by Germany, the measure had already been put into effect; the case was therefore registered by the Commission as unnotified aid under case NN 89/02.
Končno je Nemčija z dopisom z dne 17. julija 2002, evidentiranim dne 19. julija 2002, Komisiji sporočila, da je Investicijska banka dežele Brandenburg (v nadaljevanju „ILB“) Herlitzu PBS AG odobrila posojilo v višini okoli 1 milijona EUR. Po podatkih Nemčije se je ta ukrep že izvajal, zato ga je Komisija vpisala v evidenco kot neprijavljeno pomoč pod št. NN 89/02.
In its response to the decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, Germany stated that the only measure it considered to be State aid was the rescue aid loan granted by ILB.
V svojem odgovoru glede sprožitve fornalnega preiskovalnega postopka je Nemčija razložila, da je edini ukrep, ki se lahko šteje za državno pomoč, sanacijsko posojilo, ki ga je odobrila banka ILB.
Germany submitted that this aid was compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
Ta pomoč pa je združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission received comments from one interested party.
Pripombe je predložila ena zainteresirana stranka.
It forwarded them to Germany, which was given the opportunity to react.
Komisija jih je posredovala Nemčiji in ji dala možnost odgovora.
The contract between the Liegenschaftsfonds and the Herlitz Group contained a clause for increasing the ground rent from 3 to 7,5 % in the event that the use of the land changed and if the new form of use were against the interests of the owner.
Pogodba med Liegenschaftsfonds in Skupino Herlitz je vsebovala klavzulo o zvišanju najemnine s 3 % na 7,5 % v primeru, da se spremeni namembnost zemljišča in da je nova uporaba zemljišča v nasprotju z lastnikovimi interesi.
Nevertheless, when the Herlitz Group sold the emphyteusis on the Berlin-Tegel property to GGB, the Liegenschaftsfonds did not increase the ground rent.
Kljub temu pa se po prenosu dedne stavbne pravice za zemljišče v Berlin Teglu na GGB najemnina za zemljišče ni povišala.
Secondly, the Herlitz Group also received credits that were fully secured through a first-ranking land charge on the Berlin-Tegel property: a credit of EUR 15,4 million from Hypovereinsbank and a credit of EUR 30,8 million from Eurohypo. These two credits did not enter into the settlement agreement but could be waived against Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG, because the securing Berlin-Tegel property was sold to GGB.
Nadalje je Skupina Herlitz prejela kredite, ki so bili zavarovani s prednostnim osnovnim dolgom na zemljišče v Berlin Teglu: banka Hypovereinsbank je Skupini odobrila kredit v višini 15,4 milijona EUR, banka Eurohypo pa kredit v višini 30,8 milijona EUR. Ta dva kredita nista bila vključena v sporazum o poravnavi, vendar bi ju Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG lahko odpisali, saj je bilo zavarovano zemljišče v Berlin Teglu prodano družbi GGB.
authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Slovenia
o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Sloveniji
(notified under document number C(2005) 4744)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4744)
Article 2(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 provides that the grading of pig carcases must be determined by estimating the content of lean meat in accordance with statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcase.
Člen 2(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3220/84 določa, da je treba razvrščati prašičje trupe z ocenjevanjem mesnatosti v skladu s statistično preizkušenimi metodami ocenjevanja, ki temeljijo na fizičnih meritvah enega ali več anatomskih delov prašičjega trupa.
The authorisation of grading methods is subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment.
Metode razvrščanja se odobrijo ob upoštevanju skladnosti z največjo toleranco statistične napake pri ocenjevanju.
This tolerance was defined in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85 of 24 October 1985 laying down detailed rules for the application of the Community scale for grading pig carcases [2].
To toleranco določa člen 3 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2967/85 z dne 24. oktobra 1985 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo lestvice Skupnosti za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov [2].
The Government of Slovenia has requested the Commission to authorise two methods for grading pig carcases and has submitted the results of its dissection trials which were executed before the day of accession, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85.
Vlada Republike Slovenije je zaprosila Komisijo za odobritev dveh metod razvrščanja prašičjih trupov in predložila rezultate svojih poskusov z razkosavanjem, ki so bili izvedeni pred dnem pristopa, s predložitvijo dela dve protokola, opredeljenega v členu 3 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2967/85.
The evaluation of this request has revealed that the conditions for authorising these grading methods are fulfilled for the HGP 4 apparatus, but only partially for the ZP-DM5 apparatus.
Preučitev tega zahtevka je pokazala, da so pogoji za odobritev teh metod razvrščanja izpolnjeni za napravo HGP 4, za napravo ZP-DM5 pa le delno.
In order to give the Slovenian authorities time to execute a new dissection trial, the authorisation for the ZP-DM5 apparatus should be time limited.
Čas za odobritev naprave ZP-DM5 je treba omejiti, da bodo imeli slovenski organi čas za izvedbo novega poskusa z razkosavanjem.
For this reason, the present authorisation may be revoked.
Zato se lahko zdaj veljavna odobritev prekliče.
The use of the following methods is hereby authorised for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in Slovenia:
Za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Sloveniji se v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3220/84 odobri uporaba naslednjih metod:
the grading method known as ‘Zwei-Punkt — DM5 (ZP)’ and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex;
metoda razvrščanja, imenovana „Zwei-Punkt – DM5 (ZP)“, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 1 Priloge;
the apparatus termed ‘Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)’ and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex.
naprava, imenovana „Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP 4)“, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 2 Priloge.
The authorisation for the ZP-DM5 grading method is granted until 31 December 2007.
Odobritev za metodo razvrščanja ZP-DM5 velja do 31. decembra 2007.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Slovenia.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Slovenijo.
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN SLOVENIA
METODE RAZVRŠČANJA PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV V SLOVENIJI
Grading of pig carcases shall be carried out by means of the method termed ‘Zwei-Punkt — DM5 (ZP)’.
Razvrščanje prašičjih trupov se opravi z metodo, imenovano „Zwei-Punkt – DM5 (ZP)“.
The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Delež mesnatosti trupa se izračuna z naslednjo enačbo:
estimated percentage of lean meat in the carcase,
ocenjeni odstotek mesnatosti trupa,
visible thickness of the lumbar muscle on the midline of split carcase in millimetres, measured as the shortest connection between the front (cranial) end of lumbar muscle and the upper (dorsal) edge of the vertebral canal,
vidna debelina ledvene mišice na vzdolžni osi razkosanega trupa v milimetrih, merjena kot najkrajša povezava med sprednjim (kranialnim) koncem ledvene mišice in zgornjim (dorsalnim) robom hrbteničnega kanala,