natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A description of the situation on the day of notification of this Decision regarding the operation of services in accordance with the obligations and the identity of the carrier or carriers operating the services.
na dan obvestila o tej odločbi opis stanja v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem teh obveznosti in identiteto letalskega(-ih) prevoznika(-ov), ki opravlja(-jo) storitve,
The operating forecasts (passenger traffic, freight, financial forecasts, etc.) communicated by the carrier or carriers.
napovedi opravljanja storitev (potniški promet, prevoznina, finančne napovedi itd.), ki jih je (so jih) sporočil(-i) letalski prevoznik(-i),
Any claims existing before the national courts on the day of notification of this Decision and the legal situation of the notice imposing the public service obligations.
na dan obvestila o tej odločbi obstoj morebitnih pritožb na nacionalna sodišča in pravni položaj uvedbe obveznosti javnih služb.
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta odločba bo objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 3 March 2005.
V Bruslju, 3. marca 2005
Regulation as last amended by European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1882/2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
OJ C 306, 10.12.2004, p. 6.
UL C 306, 10.12.2004, str. 6.
OJ C 284, 7.10.2000, p. 16.
UL C 284, 7.10.2000, str. 16.
Amendment to OJ C 49, 15.2.2001, p. 2.
Sprememba UL C 49, 15.2.2001, str. 2.
Corrigendum to OJ C 63, 28.2.2001, p. 12.
Popravljena različica UL C 63, 28.2.2001, str. 12.
OJ C 51, 16.2.2001, p. 22.
UL C 51, 16.2.2001, str. 22.
Article 3(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92.
Člen 3(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92.
Article 4(1)(b)(iv) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92.
Člen 4(1)(b)(iv) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92.
All 18 routes indicated above and the public service obligations imposed upon them constitute a single package which must be accepted completely and entirely by the interested carriers without any compensation regardless of nature or origin. Each single carrier (or leading carrier) which accepts the public service obligations must provide a performance security for the purpose of guaranteeing the correct execution and continuation of the service.
Osemnajst navedenih letalskih prog in obveznosti javnih služb, ki so zanje uvedene, sestavljajo eno skupino, ki jo morajo zainteresirani letalski prevozniki sprejeti v celoti, ne glede na naravo ali izvor nadomestil.
This security must amount to at least EUR 15 million and be guaranteed by a bank surety to be activated upon the first request for at least EUR 5 million and by an insurance surety for the remaining amount.
Vsak posamezni letalski prevoznik (ali glavni letalski prevoznik), ki sprejme obveznosti javnih služb, bo plačal jamstvo za zagotovitev pravilnega in stalnega izvajanja storitve, ki bo znašalo najmanj 15 milijonov EUR in ga bo zagotavljala banka od prvega zahtevka v vrednosti najmanj 5 milijonov EUR ter z zavarovanjem za preostali znesek.
Alitalia: Cagliari–Rome.
Alitalia za letalsko progo Cagliari–Rim,
Air One: Cagliari–Milan, Alghero–Milan and Alghero–Rome.
Air One za letalske proge Cagliari–Milano, Alghero– Milano in Alghero–Rim,
The requirement that interested carriers operate all 18 routes to which the public service obligations apply as a single package is a particularly significant restriction of the principle of the freedom to provide services. It is in breach of the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination; considering in particular:
obveznost, uvedena za zainteresirane letalske prevoznike za opravljanje zračnih prevozov za celotno skupino zadevnih osemnajstih letalskih prog, je še posebno pomembna omejitev načela prostega pretoka storitev; in je v nasprotju z načeli nediskriminacije in sorazmernosti; pri tem se zlasti upošteva:
The very short time, 15 days from the publication of the notice in the Official Journal given to interested carriers to accept the public service obligations and twenty two days to begin operating (on 1 January 2005), are likely to create unjustified discrimination between them. In reality, it is impossible for a carrier not already operating on routes to Sardinia to complete the legal and administrative formalities in the time allowed and mobilise the resources needed to set up such an operation.
zelo kratki roki, ki jih imajo na voljo zainteresirani letalski prevozniki, to je 15 dni po objavi uvedbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, da se zavežejo izpolnjevati obveznosti javnih služb, in 22 dni za začetek opravljanja prevozov (s 1. januarjem 2005), predstavljajo diskriminacijo med zainteresiranimi letalskimi prevozniki; v bistvu je nemogoče, da letalski prevoznik, ki še ne opravlja prevozov na letalskih progah s Sardinijo, v predpisanem roku opravi vse pravne in administrativne postopke ter zbere potrebna sredstva za vzpostavitev opravljanja takšnih prevozov;
Council and Commission decision
Sklep Sveta in Komisije
on the conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
o sklenitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Armenijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,
IN KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI STA –
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 44(2), the last sentence of Article 47(2), and Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133 and 181a, in conjunction with the second sentence of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3), thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 44(2), zadnjega stavka člena 47(2) in členov 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133 in 181a v povezavi z drugim stavkom člena 300(2) in prvim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 101 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 101 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the 2003 Treaty of Accession, and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o pristopu iz leta 2003 in zlasti člena 2(3) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 6(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003 in zlasti člena 6(2) Akta,
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part [2], to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union was signed on behalf of the European Communities and their Member States on 30 April 2004.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Armenijo na drugi strani [2], zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji je bil v imenu Evropskih skupnosti in njunih držav članic podpisan 30. aprila 2004.
The Protocol should be approved,
Protokol je treba odobriti –
The Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union is hereby approved on behalf of the Community, the European Atomic Energy Community and the Member States.
Protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Armenijo na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji se odobri v imenu Evropske skupnosti, Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in držav članic.
The text of the Protocol is attached to this Decision [3].Article 2
Besedilo Protokola je priloženo temu sklepu [3].Člen 2
The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Community and its Member States, give the notification provided for in Article 4 of the Protocol.
Predsednik Sveta v imenu Skupnosti pošlje uradno obvestilo iz člena 4 Protokola.
The President of the Commission shall simultaneously give such notification on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.
Predsednik Komisije istočasno pošlje to uradno obvestilo v imenu Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo.
For the Commission
Za Komisijo Predsednik
Opinion delivered on 26 October 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Mnenje z dne 26. oktobra 2004 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
OJ L 239, 9.9.1999, p. 3.
UL L 239, 9.9.1999, str. 3.
See OJ L 300, 25.9.2004, p. 44.
Glej UL L 300, 25.9.2004, str. 44.
amending Decision 2000/256/EC authorising the Kingdom of the Netherlands to apply a measure derogating from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
o spremembi Odločbe 2000/256/ES, ki dovoljuje Kraljevini Nizozemski uporabo ukrepa o odstopanju od člena 11 Šeste direktive 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [1], and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27(1) Direktive,
By Decision 2000/256/EC [2] the Council authorised the Kingdom of the Netherlands, by way of derogation from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC to include in the taxable amount of a supply of goods or a supply of services, the value of any gold used by the supplier and provided by the recipient in the case where the supply of the gold to the recipient was exempt in accordance with Article 26(b) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
Svet je z Odločbo 2000/256/ES [2] dovolil Kraljevini Nizozemski, da z odstopanjem od člena 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS vključi v davčno osnovo dobave blaga ali storitev vrednosti zlata, ki ga je uporabil dobavitelj in zagotovil prejemnik, v primeru da je bil prejemnik za dobavo zlata oproščen v skladu s členom 26b Direktive 77/388/EGS.
The aim of that derogation was to avoid abuse of the exemption for investment gold and thus to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.
Namen tega odstopanja je bilo izogibanje zlorabi oprostitve za investicijsko zlato in s tem preprečevanje nekaterih vrst izogibanja davkom ali davčnih utaj.
By letter registered with the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 8 September 2004, the Dutch Government requested an extension for the validity of Decision 2000/256/EC, which expired on 31 December 2004.
S pismom, registriranim v Generalnem sekretariatu Komisije 8. septembra 2004, je nizozemska vlada zaprosila za podaljšanje veljavnosti Odločbe 2000/256/ES, ki je prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2004.
In accordance with Article 27(2) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 22 November 2004 of the request made by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
V skladu s členom 27(2) Direktive 77/388/EGS je Komisija s pismom z dne 22. novembra 2004 obvestila druge države članice o prošnji Kraljevine Nizozemske.
By letter dated 24 November 2004, the Commission notified the Kingdom of the Netherlands that it had all the information it considered necessary for appraisal of the request.
S pismom z dne 24. novembra 2004 je Komisija uradno obvestila Kraljevino Nizozemsko, da ima na voljo vse informacije, potrebne za oceno prošnje.
According to the Dutch authorities, the derogation authorised by Decision 2000/256/EC has been effective in achieving the aims stated above.
Po mnenju pristojnih nizozemskih organov je bilo odstopanje, odobreno z Odločbo 2000/256/ES, glede doseganja zgoraj navedenih ciljev učinkovito.
It is therefore necessary to extend the validity of the derogation granted under Decision 2000/256/EC until the entry into force of a directive rationalising the derogations pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC which covers the avoidance of value added tax linked to the exemption for investment gold or until 31 December 2009, whichever is the earlier.
Zato je treba veljavnost odstopanja, odobrenega na podlagi Odločbe 2000/256/ES, podaljšati do začetka veljavnosti direktive o racionalizaciji odstopanj na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 77/388/EGS, ki zajema izogibanje plačilu davka na dodano vrednost, v povezavi z oprostitvijo za investicijsko zlato, ali do 31. decembra 2009, pri čemer se upošteva zgodnejši datum.
Article 2 of Decision 2000/256/EC shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 2 Odločbe 2000/256/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The authorisation granted under Article 1 shall expire on the date of entry into force of a directive rationalising the derogations pursuant to Article 27 of Directive 77/388/EEC which counter avoidance of value added tax linked to the exemption for investment gold or on 31 December 2009 whichever is the earlier.’
Dovoljenje na podlagi člena 1 preneha veljati na dan začetka veljavnosti direktive o racionalizaciji odstopanj na podlagi člena 27 Direktive 77/388/EGS, ki preprečujejo izogibanje plačilu davka na dodano vrednost v povezavi z oprostitvijo za investicijsko zlato, ali 31. decembra 2009, pri čemer se upošteva zgodnejši datum.“
OJ L 79, 30.3.2000, p. 36.
UL L 79, 30.3.2000, str. 36.
authorising Denmark to apply a measure derogating from Article 14(1)(d) of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
ki dovoljuje Danski uporabo ukrepa o odstopanju od člena 14(1)(d) Šeste direktive 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/CEE of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment [1], and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27(1) Direktive,
In a letter registered by the Commission’s Secretariat-General on 17 May 2004, the Danish authorities informed the Commission of their wish to introduce special measures for derogation from the Directive in order to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.
S pismom, registriranim v Generalnem sekretariatu Komisije dne 17. maja 2004, so danski pristojni organi obvestili Komisijo o prošnji za uvedbo posebnih ukrepov o odstopanju od Direktive, da bi preprečili nekatere načine izogibanja davkom ali davčnih utaj.
They provided the Commission with all the relevant information to that effect.
V ta namen so Komisiji zagotovili vse potrebne informacije.
The other Member States were informed of the request on 15 October 2004.
Druge države članice so bile o prošnji obveščene dne 15. oktobra 2004.
The derogating measure is intended to exclude certain magazines and periodicals imported into Denmark from the exemption under Article 14(1)(d) of the Directive and to apply VAT on them.
Ukrep o odstopanju je namenjen izključitvi nekaterih revij in periodičnega tiska uvoženega na Dansko iz oprostitve v skladu s členom 14(1)(d) Direktive ter uporabi DDV zanje.
That Article was implemented by Directive 83/181/EEC [2], which stipulates that goods of a total value not exceeding EU-10 shall be exempt from VAT on admission.
Omenjeni člen se je začel izvajati z Direktivo 83/181/EGS [2], ki določa, da je blago v skupni vrednosti manjši od 10 EUR ob uvozu oproščeno DDV.
Member States may grant exemption for imported goods of a total value of more than EU-10, but not exceeding EUR 22. Denmark currently exempts from VAT imports from third countries of all small consignments with a commercial nature.
Države članice lahko odobrijo oprostitve za uvoženo blago v skupni vrednosti večji od 10 EUR, ki pa ne presega 22 EUR. Na Danskem je trenutno uvoz vseh malih pošiljk komercialne narave iz tretjih držav oproščen DDV.
The Danish limit for VAT exemption is DKK 80 (EU-10).
Danska omejitev za oprostitev od DDV znaša 80 DKK (10 EUR).
The Danish authorities have discovered that some publishing companies re-route the distribution of their publications to subscribers in Denmark via territories not covered by the Sixth Directive, with a loss in revenue for Denmark and consequently with a negative impact on the Community’s own resources.
Danski pristojni organi so ugotovili, da nekatere založniške družbe preusmerjajo distribucijo svojih publikacij naročnikom na Danskem preko ozemelj, ki niso zajeta v Šesti direktivi, kar pomeni izgubo prihodka za Dansko in posledično negativen učinek na lastna sredstva Skupnosti.
There is the risk that the loss of revenue will increase unless Denmark is authorised to prevent this type of tax avoidance.
Obstaja tveganje, da se bo izguba prihodka povečala, če se Danski ne bo dovolilo, da prepreči takšno izogibanje davkom.
The request for derogation only targets the consignments and situations connected with the avoidance scheme and does not intend to exclude all mail order consignments from the exemption on the basis of Article 22 of Directive 83/181/EEC.
Prošnja za odstopanje zadeva le pošiljke in okoliščine, v katerih gre za izogibanje in ni namenjena izključitvi vseh pošiljk, naročenih po pošti, iz oprostitve na podlagi člena 22 Direktive 83/181/EGS.
It therefore appears that the proposed derogation from Article 14(1)(d) of Directive 77/388/EEC is in fact the most appropriate solution in this specific case.
Zato se zdi, da je predlagano odstopanje od člena 14(1)(d) Direktive 77/388/EGS pravzaprav najprimernejša rešitev v tem posebnem primeru.
The derogation avoids the loss of VAT and will therefore not adversely affect the Communities’ own resources,
Izgubi DDV se s tem odstopanjem izogne in zaradi tega ne bo negativnih vplivov na lastna sredstva Skupnosti –
By way of derogation from Article 14(1)(d) of Directive 77/388/EEC, Denmark is authorised to apply VAT on the importation into Denmark of magazines, periodicals or the like, printed in the territory of the Community, as defined in Article 3 of the said Directive and sent to private individuals in Denmark.
Danski se z odstopanjem od člena 14(1)(d) Direktive 77/388/EGS dovoli uporaba DDV na uvoz revij in drugega periodičnega tiska natisnjenega na ozemlju Skupnosti, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 3 omenjene direktive in poslanega posameznikom na Danskem.
This Decision shall apply until 31 December 2010.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. decembra 2010.
This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Kraljevino Dansko.
OJ L 105, 23.4.1983, p. 38.
UL L 105, 23.4.1983, str. 38.
Directive as last amended by the Act of Accession of 2003.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003.
authorising the Republic of Cyprus to apply a measure derogating from Article 11 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
ki dovoljuje Republiki Ciper uporabo ukrepa o odstopanju od člena 11 Šeste direktive 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax; uniform basis of assessment [1], and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27(1) Direktive,
In a letter registered by the Commission’s Secretariat-General on 11 November 2004, the Republic of Cyprus sought authorisation for a measure in existence prior to accession to the European Union and which derogates from Article 11(A)(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
S pismom, registriranim v Generalnem sekretariatu Komisije dne 11. novembra 2004, je Republika Ciper zaprosila za dovoljenje ukrepa, ki je obstajal že pred pristopom k Evropski uniji, ki odstopa od člena 11(A)(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS.
The measure requiring a derogation is intended to counter tax avoidance through the manipulation of the value of supplies subject to value added tax (VAT).
Ukrep zaradi katerega je potrebno odstopanje, je namenjen preprečevanju izogibanja davkom z manipulacijo vrednosti dobav, za katere se uporablja davek na dodano vrednost (DDV).
The measure should apply only in cases where the administration is able, based on the facts, to conclude that the determination of the taxable amount provided for in Article 11(A)(1)(a) of the said Directive is influenced by family, legal or business ties between the supplier and the recipient.
Ukrep se mora uporabljati samo v primerih, kjer uprava na podlagi dejstev lahko sklepa, da so na določitev davčne osnove iz člena 11(A)(1)(a) omenjene direktive vplivale družinske, pravne ali poslovne povezave med dobaviteljem in prejemnikom.
In this matter the administration should not act on mere presumptions, and the parties concerned should be allowed to adduce evidence to the contrary where they dispute the level of the open market value established by the administration.
V tej zadevi uprava ne sme delovati na podlagi domnev in zadevnim strankam mora biti dovoljeno, da predložijo dokaze o nasprotnem, kadar oporekajo stopnji tržne vrednosti, ki jo je določila uprava.
The measure is strictly targeted so that it can only be invoked when a series of conditions have been met and an absolute tax loss identified; and is therefore proportionate to the aim pursued.
Ukrep je ozko usmerjen, tako da ga je možno uporabiti le, kadar je izpolnjena vrsta pogojev in ugotovljen popoln izpad davka; torej je ukrep sorazmeren z želenim ciljem.
Similar derogations have been granted to other Member States to counter tax avoidance and have been found to be effective.
Podobna odstopanja so bila odobrena drugim državam članicam z namenom preprečevanja izogibanja davkom in so se izkazala za učinkovita.
This derogation will safeguard the amount of VAT due at the final consumption stage and has no negative impact on the Communities’ own resources from VAT,
S tem odstopanjem se bo zagotovil znesek DDV, ki ga je treba plačati na končni stopnji potrošnje, in nima negativnega vpliva na lastna sredstva Skupnosti od DDV –