natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH (Germany),
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH Gelsenkirchen (Nemčija),
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveira Sa & Filhos, SA (Portugal),
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveira Sa & Filhos, SA (Portugalska),
Trefileurope, SA (France).
Trefileurope, SA (Francija).
The Commission sent questionnaires to the exporting producers and Community producers selected in the sample and all other parties known to be concerned.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike proizvajalcem izvoznikom in proizvajalcem Skupnosti, ki so bili izbrani v vzorec, in vsem drugim strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva.
Replies were received from the three Korean exporting producers selected in the sample, and one importer in the Community related to one of the Korean exporters, the five Community industry producers selected in the sample, the cooperating unrelated importer, two suppliers of raw materials and ten users.
Komisija je prejela odgovore treh korejskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, izbranih v vzorec, in enega uvoznika v Skupnost, ki je povezan z enim korejskim izvoznikom, petih proizvajalcev industrije Skupnosti, izbranih v vzorec, sodelujočega nepovezanega uvoznika, dveh dobaviteljev surovin in desetih uporabnikov.
The Commission sought and verified all the information it deemed necessary for the purpose of a preliminary determination of dumping, resulting injury and Community interest.
Komisija je iskala in preverila vse podatke, ki so bile po njenem mnenju potrebni za predhodno ugotavljanje dampinga, škode, ki je zaradi tega nastala, in interesa Skupnosti.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Preveritveni obiski so potekali v prostorih naslednjih družb:
Community industry producers
Proizvajalci industrije Skupnosti
BTS Drahtseile GmbH, Gelsenkirchen (Germany),
BTS Drahtseile GmbH, Gelsenkirchen (Nemčija),
Cables y Alambres especiales, SA, Bilbao (Spain),
Cables y Alambres especiales, SA, Bilbao (Španija),
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH, Kirkel (Germany),
CASAR Drahtseilwerk Saar GmbH, Kirkel (Nemčija),
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveira Sa & Filhos, SA, Gemunde (Portugal),
Manuel Rodrigues de Oliveira Sa & Filhos, SA, Gemunde (Portugalska),
Trefileurope SA, Bourg en Bresse (France).
Trefileurope SA, Bourg en Bresse (Francija).
Unrelated importer
Neodvisni uvoznik
Interkabel GmbH, Solms (Germany),
Interkabel GmbH, Solms (Nemčija).
Exporting producers in Korea
Proizvajalci izvozniki v Koreji
Kiswire Ltd, Seoul,
Kiswire Ltd, Seul,
Chung-Woo Rope Co., Ltd., Busan.
Chung-Woo Rope Co., Ltd., Busan
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2003 to 30 June 2004 (investigation period or IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je zajela obdobje od 1. julija 2003 do 30. junija 2004 („obdobje preiskave“ ali „OP“).
The examination of trends in the context of the injury analysis covered the period from 1 January 2001 to the end of the IP (period under consideration).
Preiskava gibanj v okviru analize škode je zajela obdobje od 1. januarja 2001 do konca OP („obravnavano obdobje“).
Product concerned and like product
Zadevni izdelek in podobni izdelek
The product concerned is ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, of iron or steel but not stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, with attached fittings or not originating in the Republic of Korea (the product concerned), normally declared within CN codes 73121082, 73121084, 73121086 and 73121088 and 73121099.
Zadevni izdelek so jeklene vrvi in kabli, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, iz železa ali jekla, vendar ne iz nerjavnega jekla, z največjim prečnim prerezom več kot 3 mm, opremljeni s priborom (fitingi) ali brez, s poreklom iz Republike Koreje („zadevni izdelek“), običajno uvrščen pod oznake KN 73121082, 73121084, 73121086 in 73121088 in 73121099.
The Association representing Community importers (EWRIA) argued that the imported products differ substantially from the ones manufactured and sold in the Community, and should not be compared.
Združenje, ki predstavlja uvoznike Skupnosti (EWRIA) je trdilo, da se uvoženi izdelki bistveno razlikujejo od tistih izdelkov, ki se proizvajajo in prodajajo v Skupnosti, in se jih ne sme primerjati.
The same argument had been addressed in depth in Regulation (EC) No 230/2001 where it was concluded that the products produced by the Community industry have to be considered as like product.
Ista utemeljitev je bila podrobneje obravnavana v Uredbi (ES) št. 230/2001, kjer je bilo sklenjeno, da je treba izdelke, ki jih je proizvedla industrija Skupnosti, šteti za podobni izdelek.
As EWRIA did not bring any new element, the conclusions reached in the aforementioned Regulation are confirmed.
Ker združenje EWRIA ni predložilo novih elementov, se potrdijo sklepne ugotovitve iz prej omenjene uredbe.
This investigation showed that the products exported by the exporting producers and those manufactured and sold by the Community producers on the Community market have the same basic physical and technical characteristics and end uses and are therefore considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ta preiskava je pokazala, da imajo izdelki, ki jih je izvozil proizvajalec izvoznik in izdelki, ki jih proizvaja in prodaja proizvajalec Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti, enake osnovne fizikalne in tehnične značilnosti ter enako uporabo, zato se jih šteje za podobne izdelke v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
The same is true with regard to the products manufactured by the Korean producers and sold on the Korean domestic market.
Enako velja za proizvode, ki jih proizvajajo korejski proizvajalci in se prodajajo na korejskem domačem trgu.
Global representativity
Globalna reprezentativnost
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined for each cooperating exporting producer whether its domestic sales of SWR were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales represented at least 5 % of the total export sales volume of the producer to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika preverila, ali je njegova domača prodaja JŽV reprezentativna, to pomeni, ali celotni obseg te prodaje predstavlja vsaj 5 % celotne izvozne prodaje proizvajalca v Skupnost.
Product type comparability
Primerljivost vrste izdelka
The Commission subsequently identified those types of SWR sold domestically that were identical or directly comparable with the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je nato opredelila, katere vrste JŽV, prodane na domačem trgu, so identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost.
The Commission considered domestically sold and exported product types to be directly comparable when they had a similar number of strands, number of wires per strand, construction of wires in strand, core, tensile strength, wire characteristics, rope special characteristics, rope cover and diameter.
Komisija je menila, da so na domačem trgu prodane in izvožene vrste izdelka neposredno primerljive, kolikor so se ujemale v naslednjih lastnostih: število pramenov, število žic v pramenu, konstrukcija žic v pramenu, stržen, natezna trdnost, lastnosti žice, posebne značilnosti vrvi, plašč vrvi in premer.
Product type specific representativity
Posebna reprezentativnost glede na vrsto izdelka
For each type sold by the exporting producer on their domestic market and found to be directly comparable with the type of SWR sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki ga je proizvajalec izvoznik prodal na svojem domačem trgu in za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto JŽV, ki je bila prodana za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type of SWR were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable type of SWR exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja določene vrste JŽV se je štela za dovolj reprezentativno, če je celotni obseg domače prodaje te vrste v OP predstavljal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste JŽV, izvožene v Skupnost.
It was found that the majority of the product types exported to the Community was sold in representative quantities on the domestic market.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila večina vrst izdelkov, ki se izvaža v Skupnost, prodana v reprezentativnih količinah na domačem trgu.
Ordinary course of trade test
Preskus običajnega poteka trgovanja
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of each company could be considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade in accordance with Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je pozneje proučila, ali bi za domačo prodajo vsake družbe lahko veljalo, da je bila dosežena med običajnim potekom trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of domestic sales to independent customers, of each exported product type, sold at a loss on the domestic market during the IP.
To je bilo opravljeno tako, da je bil ugotovljen delež domače prodaje neodvisnim strankam za vsako izvoženo vrsto izdelkov, ki je bila prodana na domačem trgu z izgubo med OP.
For those product types where more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs and where the weighted average sales price was equal to or higher than the weighted average production cost, normal value, per product type, was calculated as the weighted average of all domestic sales prices of the type in question.
Za tiste vrste izdelka, pri katerih več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na domačen trgu ni bilo pod stroški na enoto in pri katerih je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena enaka tehtanim povprečnim proizvodnim stroškom ali višja, je bila normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje vseh domačih prodajnih cen zadevne vrste.
For those product types where at least 10 %, but not more than 80 %, by volume of sales on the domestic market where not below unit costs, normal value, per product type, was calculated as the weighted average of domestic sales prices which were found equal to or above unit costs only, of the type in question.
Za tiste vrste izdelkov, pri katerih vsaj 10 %, vendar ne več kakor 80 % obsega prodaje na domačen trgu ni bilo pod stroški na enoto, je bila normalna vrednost po vrsti izdelka izračunana kot tehtano povprečje domačih prodajnih cen, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so zgolj enake stroškom na enoto zadevne vrste ali jih presegajo.
For those product types where less than 10 %, by volume, was sold on the domestic market at a price not below unit costs, it was considered that the product type concerned was not sold in the ordinary course of trade and therefore, another methodology had to be applied to determine normal value.
Za vrste izdelkov, pri katerih je bilo manj kot 10 % obsega na domačen trgu prodanega po ceni, ki ni bila pod stroški na enoto, je veljalo, da zadevna vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana med običajnim potekom trgovanja, in zato je morala biti za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabljena druga metodologija.
As a result of the above it was found that the majority of the product types exported was sold in the ordinary course of trade on the domestic market.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bila večina izvoženih vrst izdelkov prodana pri običajnem poteku trgovanja na domačem trgu.
Normal value based on actual domestic prices
Normalna vrednost, ki temelji na dejanskih domačih cenah
For the types sold for export to the Community by the investigated companies where the requirements set out in sections 3.1.3 and 3.1.4(a) and (b) were met, normal value was based, for the corresponding product types, on the actual prices paid or payable, by independent customers in the Korean domestic market, during the IP, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Za vrste, ki so jih preiskovane družbe prodale za izvoz v Skupnost in pri katerih so bile izpolnjene zahteve iz zgornjih oddelkov 3.1.3 in 3.1.4(a) in (b), je normalna vrednost za ustrezne vrste izdelkov temeljila na dejanskih cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih s strani neodvisnih kupcev med OP na korejskem domačem trgu v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
Normal value based on domestic prices of other producers in Korea
Normalna vrednost, ki temelji na domačih cenah drugih proizvajalcev v Koreji
For product types falling under section 3.1.4(c), as well as for product types which were not sold by the exporting producers in representative quantities on the Korean domestic market, as mentioned in section 3.1.3, it was first considered whether for these product types sales prices of other domestic producers can be used in order to determine normal value.
Za vrste izdelkov, ki spadajo v oddelek 3.1.4(c), in za vrste izdelkov, ki jih proizvajalci izvozniki niso prodali v reprezentativnih količinah na korejskem domačem trgu, kakor je omenjeno v oddelku 3.1.3 zgoraj, se je najprej proučilo, ali se lahko za te vrste izdelkov za določitev normalne vrednosti uporabijo prodajne cene drugih domačih proizvajalcev.
However, it was found that a number of different models of SWR are sold and a variety of factors affect the final sales price.
Vendar je bilo ugotovljeno, da se prodajajo številni drugi modeli JŽV in da na končno prodajno ceno vplivajo različni dejavniki.
The differences between the models sold would have implied numerous adjustments which would have to be based on estimates.
Razlika med prodanimi modeli je pomenila številne prilagoditve, ki bi morale temeljiti na ocenah.
It was therefore considered more appropriate to construct normal value.
Zato še je zdelo bolj primerno konstruirati normalno vrednost.
Normal value based on constructed value
Normalna vrednost, ki temelji na konstruirani vrednosti
Considering the above, for all product types mentioned in recital 29, normal value was constructed on the basis of Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Upoštevajoč zgoraj navedeno je bila za vse vrste izdelka, omenjenih v uvodni izjavi (29), normalna vrednost konstruirana na podlagi člena 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
In constructing normal value, the selling, general and administrative (SG & A) expenses incurred and the weighted average profit realised by the cooperating exporting producers concerned on domestic sales of the like product, made in the ordinary course of trade during the IP, were added to their own average cost of manufacturing during the IP, in accordance with Article 2(6) of the basic Regulation.
Pri konstruiranju normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(6) osnovne uredbe so nastali prodajni, splošni in administrativni stroški (PSA stroški) ter tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki so ga zadevni sodelujoči proizvajalci izvozniki ustvarili pri domači prodaji podobnega izdelka med običajnim potekom trgovanja v OP, dodani njihovim lastnim povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje med OP.
Where necessary, a part of the manufacturing cost, which had been incorrectly allocated for one company, and SG & A expenses were corrected, before being used in the ordinary course of trade test and in constructing normal value.
Po potrebi so bili del proizvodnih stroškov, ki so bili napačno razporejeni za eno družbo, ter PSA stroški popravljeni, preden se jih je uporabilo v preskusu običajnega poteka trgovanja in pri konstruirani normalni vrednosti.
In this regard, all exporting producers concerned included non-operating expenses in their SG & A expenses on the domestic market for the like product.
V tej zvezi so vsi zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki neoperativne stroške za podobni izdelek vključili v svoje PSA stroške na domačem trgu.
Also, these exporters deducted amounts of income not linked to sales of the like product on the domestic market from the SG & A expenses.
Poleg tega so ti izvozniki zneske dohodka, ki ni povezan s prodajo, podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu odšteli od PSA stroškov.
However, the investigation revealed that some of these income and expenses could not be linked to the sales of the like product on the domestic market and should therefore not have been allocated to or deducted from the relevant SG & A expenses.
Vendar je preiskava pokazala, da nekaj teh dohodkov in stroškov ni moglo biti povezanih s prodajo podobnega izdelka na domačem trgu in zato ne bi smeli biti dodeljeni ustreznim PSA stroškom ali od njih odšteti.
Consequently such non-operating income and expenses were excluded from the reported SG & A.
Posledično so bili taki neoperativni prihodek in stroški izključeni iz prijavljenih PSA stroškov.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, kjer se je zadevni izdelek izvozil neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, in sicer na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen.
Where the export sale was made via a related importer, the export price was constructed, pursuant to Article 2(9) of the Basic Regulation, on the basis of the price at which the imported products were first resold to an independent buyer, duly adjusted for all costs incurred between importation and resale and profits.
Kjer se je izvozna prodaja odvijala prek povezanega uvoznika, je bila izvozna cena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe konstruirana na podlagi cene, po kateri so bili uvoženi izdelki najprej preprodani neodvisnemu kupcu; ta pa je bila ustrezno prilagojena za vse stroške, ki so nastali med uvozom in preprodajo, ter dobičke.
In this regard, the related importer’s own SG & A costs were used.
Tako so bili uporabljeni lastni PSA stroški povezanega uvoznika.
In the absence of any other more reliable information, a reasonable profit margin was estimated to be 5 %.
Ker ni bilo drugih zanesljivejših podatkov, se ocenjuje, da je razumna stopnja dobička 5 %.
This profit margin was used in a prior anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of the same product and where definitive findings were published by Council Regulation (EC) No 1601/2001 [15].
Ta stopnja dobička je bila uporabljena v predhodni protidampinški preiskavi glede uvoza istega izdelka, končne ugotovitve glede tega pa so bile objavljene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1601/2001 [15].
No information was available to show that this was not a reliable margin.
Na voljo ni bilo podatkov, ki bi pokazali, da to ni bila zanesljiva stopnja.
The normal value and export prices were compared on an ex-works basis.
Normalna vrednost in izvozne cene so bile primerjane na podlagi cene izdelka franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Za zagotavljanje poštene primerjave med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno so bile opravljene ustrezne prilagoditve za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Appropriate adjustments were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Primerne prilagoditve so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, kjer je bilo ugotovljeno, da so smiselne, točne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
On this basis allowances for differences in discounts, rebate, commissions, inland freight, packing, credit cost, ocean freight, insurance, handling and loading charges, bank charges and other factors were made.
Na podlagi tega so bila odobrena nadomestila za razlike v popustih, rabatih, provizijah, notranjem prevozu, pakiranju, stroških kredita, čezmorskega prevoza in zavarovanja, stroških manipuliranja in natovarjanja, bančnih stroških in drugih dejavnikih.
Allowances to the normal value were claimed by all exporting producers for credit costs incurred on the domestic market.
Vsi proizvajalci izvozniki so za stroške kredita, ki so nastali na domačem trgu, zahtevali prilagoditve normalne vrednosti.
However, all Korean exporting producers were using an open account system and no link could be established between the claimed credit cost and the domestic sales transactions in question.
Vendar so vsi korejski proizvajalci izvozniki uporabljali sistem odprtega računa in ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti povezave med zahtevanimi stroški kredita in zadevnimi transakcijami domače prodaje.
Therefore, it could not be established that such factor had an impact on price and price comparability as required by Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Zato ni bilo mogoče dokazati, da so takšni dejavniki vplivali na cene in primerljivost cen, kot zahteva člen 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Consequently, these claims had to be rejected.
Zato je bilo treba te zahtevke zavrniti.
An adjustment was also claimed by all exporting producers for credit costs incurred on export sales to the Community.
Prilagoditev so proizvajalci izvozniki zahtevali tudi za stroške kredita, ki so nastali pri izvozni prodaji v Skupnost.
Although such adjustment was warranted the reported amounts were understated and had to be corrected during the on-the-spot verification.
Čeprav je bila takšna prilagoditev utemeljena, so bili prijavljeni zneski podcenjeni in jih je bilo treba med preveritvenim obiskom na kraju samem popraviti.
The exporting producers concerned claimed an adjustment for differences in import charges and indirect taxes in accordance with Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki so zahtevali prilagoditev za razlike v uvozni dajatvi in posrednih davkih v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe.
For two exporting producers concerned, it was found that the amount of import duties refunded exceeded the amount of import duties paid.
Za dva zadevna proizvajalca izvoznika je bilo ugotovljeno, da je znesek povrnjenih izvoznih dajatev presegel znesek plačanih dajatev.
Therefore it is unlikely that the exporters received refunds only for those imported parts which were incorporated later in exported goods.
Zato ni verjetno, da bi izvozniki prejeli nadomestila samo za tiste uvožene dele, ki so bili pozneje vključeni v izvozno blago.
Moreover, for two of the exporting producers, the refund received when exporting SWR was not linked to import duties paid for the raw materials, i.e. a refund was received whether or not imported raw material was used for the production of the exported product.
Za dva proizvajalca izvoznika nadomestilo, prejeto pri izvozu JŽV, ni bilo povezano z uvoznimi dajatvami, plačanimi za surovine, to pomeni, da sta nadomestilo prejela ne glede na to, ali je bila uvožena surovina uporabljena za proizvodnjo izvoženega izdelka ali ne.
Therefore, it was considered that no refund of import duties has been taking place within the meaning of Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se je štelo, da v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe nadomestilo za uvozne dajatve ni bilo povrnjeno.
In any case, none of the exporting producers concerned could show whether or to what extent import charges and indirect taxes were borne by the like product when sold on the domestic market.
V vsakem primeru nobeden od zadevnih proizvajalcev izvoznikov ni mogel pokazati, ali in v kolikšni meri so izvozne dajatve in posredni davki bremenili podobni izdelek, ko je bil prodan na domačem trgu.
Therefore it could not be established that price comparability was affected.
Zato ni bilo dokazano, da se je vplivalo na primerljivost cen.
Consequently none of the conditions mentioned in the aforementioned provision was fulfilled and all claims had to be rejected.
Tako noben od pogojev, navedenih v prej omenjeni določbi, ni bil izpolnjen in vse zahtevke je bilo treba zavrniti.