natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When the validity of Regulation No 1615/2000 was extended, it was considered that its expiry should coincide with the ending of the current GSP scheme, which was due to end on that date.
Ob podaljšanju veljavnosti Uredbe št. 1614/2000 je bilo upoštevano, da mora prenehanje njene veljavnosti sovpadati z iztekom veljavnosti sedanje sheme splošnih preferencialov, ki bi morala prenehati veljati na ta datum.
On 7 July 2004 it published a Communication to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee entitled ‘Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015’ [8], which also acknowledged the need for change in rules of origin.
Dne 7. julija 2004 je objavila Sporočilo Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z naslovom „Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: delovanje splošnega sistema preferencialov (SSP) Skupnosti v obdobju deset let od 2006 do 2015“ [8], ki je tudi potrdilo potrebo po spremembi pravil o poreklu blaga.
A prolongation of the derogation should not pre-judge or prejudice the outcome of discussions on possible new rules of origin for GSP.
Podaljšanje veljavnosti odstopanja ne sme vnaprej določiti ali vplivati na izid razprav o morebitnih novih pravilih o poreklu blaga za SSP.
However, the interests of traders concluding contracts both in Nepal and in the Community, as well as the stability and the sustained development of the Nepalese industry in terms of ongoing investment and employment, require that the derogation should be prolonged for a period of time sufficient to permit the continuation or conclusion of longer-term contracts, while facilitating the transition to possible new rules of origin for GSP.
Vendar interesi trgovcev, ki sklepajo pogodbe tako v Kambodži kot v Skupnosti, pa tudi stabilnost in trajnostni razvoj kamboške industrije v smislu stalnih vlaganj in zaposlenosti zahtevajo, da se veljavnost odstopanja podaljša za obdobje, ki dovoljuje nadaljevanje ali sklepanje dolgoročnih pogodb, ob sočasnem omogočanju lažjega prehoda na morebitna nova pravila o poreklu blaga za SSP.
The provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000, in particular the existence of quantitative limits, which apply on an annual basis, reflecting the Community market's capacity to absorb the Nepalese products, Nepal's export capacity and actual recorded trade flows, were designed to prevent injury to the corresponding branches of Community industry.
Določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1614/2000, zlasti o količinskih omejitvah, ki se uporabljajo na letni osnovi in kažejo zmogljivost trga Skupnosti, da sprejme kamboške proizvode, izvozno zmogljivost Kambodže in dejanske evidentirane trgovinske tokove, so bile sestavljene z namenom, da preprečijo oškodovanje ustreznih industrijskih vej v Skupnosti.
However, in order to ensure fair treatment both for Nepal and for other least developed countries, the continuing need for the derogation should be reviewed once any new rules of origin are adopted in the context of the new generalised system of preferences.
Vendar, da bi bilo zagotovljeno pošteno obravnavanje tako Kambodže kot drugih manj razvitih držav, je treba znova preveriti stalno potrebo po odstopanju, ko se enkrat sprejmejo nova pravila o poreklu blaga, v kontekstu novega splošnega sistema preferencialov.
Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1614/2000 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1614/2000 se spremeni na naslednji način:
Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.
Za Komisijo 20. decembra 2004
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2004 (OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 23).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1828/2004 (UL L 321, 22.10.2004, str. 23).
OJ L 185, 25.7.2000, p. 46.
UL L 185, 25.7.2000, str. 46.
OJ L 46, 16.2.2002, p. 14.
UL L 46, 16.2.2002, str. 14.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2188/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2188/2004
amending Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised preferences to take account of the special situation of Nepal regarding certain exports of textiles to the Community
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1615/2000, ki ureja odstopanje od Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 glede opredelitve pojma izdelki s poreklom, ki se uporablja za splošno shemo preferencialov, z namenom upoštevanja posebnega položaja Nepala glede izvoza nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov v Skupnost
By Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 [3], the Community granted generalised tariff preferences to Nepal.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 z dne 10. decembra 2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov za obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 [3], je Skupnost Nepalu odobrila splošne tarifne preferenciale.
Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 establishes the definition of the concept of originating products to be used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP).
Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 uvaja opredelitev pojma izdelki s poreklom, ki se uporablja za namene sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov (SSP).
Nepal has benefited from such a derogation for certain textiles since 1997, in the last instance by virtue of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 of 24 July 2000 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 in respect of the definition of the concept of originating products used for the purposes of the scheme of generalised preferences to take account of the special situation of Nepal regarding certain exports of textiles to the Community [4], as amended by Regulation (EC) No 293/2002 [5], which extended its validity until 31 December 2004.
Nepal uživa ugodnosti takega odstopanja za nekatere tekstilne izdelke od leta 1997, nazadnje na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1615/2000 z dne 24. julija 2000 o odstopanju od Uredbe (EGS) št. 2454/93 glede opredelitve pojma izdelki s poreklom, ki se uporablja za namene splošne sheme preferencialov, zaradi upoštevanja posebnega položaja Nepala glede izvoza nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov v Skupnost [4], kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo št. 293/2002 [5], ki je podaljšala njeno veljavnost do 31. decembra 2004.
By letter dated 14 June 2004, Nepal has submitted a request for the renewal of this derogation.
Nepal je s pismom z dne 14. junija 2004 predložil zahtevo za podaljšanje veljavnosti odstopanja.
The request submitted by Nepal has been considered by the Commission and has been found to be duly substantiated.
Komisija je obravnavala predloženo zahtevo Nepala in presodila, da je utemeljena.
When the validity of Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 was extended, it was considered that its expiry should coincide with the ending of the current GSP scheme, which was due to end on that date.
Ob podaljšanju veljavnosti Uredbe št. 1615/2000 je bilo upoštevano, da mora prenehanje njene veljavnosti sovpadati z iztekom veljavnosti sedanje sheme splošnih preferencialov, ki bi morala prenehati veljati na ta datum.
However, Council Regulation (EC) No 2211/2003 [6] extended the validity of the GSP scheme for a further year, until 31 December 2005.
Vendar je Uredba Sveta št. 2211/2003 [6] podaljšala veljavnost sheme splošnih preferencialov za nadaljnje leto do 31. decembra 2005.
On 18 December 2003, the Commission published a Green Paper on the future of rules of origin in preferential trade arrangements [7] which opened a wide-ranging debate on the subject.
Dne 18. decembra 2003 je Komisija objavila Zeleno knjigo o prihodnjih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu blaga v preferencialnih trgovinskih režimih [7], ki je sprožila obsežno razpravo o tej temi.
On 7 July 2004, it published a Communication to the Council, the European parliament and the Economic and Social Committee entitled ‘Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community’s generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the 10-year period from 2006 to 2015’ [8], which also acknowledged the need for change in rules of origin.
Dne 7. julija 2004 je objavila Sporočilo Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z naslovom „Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: delovanje splošnega sistema preferencialov (SSP) Skupnosti v obdobju deset let od 2006 do 2015“ [8], ki je tudi potrdilo potrebo po spremembi pravil o poreklu blaga.
However, the interests of traders concluding contracts both in Nepal and in the Community, as well as the stability and the sustained development of the Nepalese industry in terms of ongoing investment and employment, require that the derogation should be prolonged for a period of time sufficient to permit the continuation or conclusion of longer-term contracts, while facilitating the transition to possible new rules of origin for GSP.
Vendar interesi trgovcev, ki sklepajo pogodbe tako v Nepalu kot v Skupnosti, pa tudi stabilnost in trajnostni razvoj nepalske industrije v smislu stalnih vlaganj in zaposlenosti zahtevajo, da se veljavnost odstopanja podaljša za obdobje, ki dovoljuje nadaljevanje ali sklepanje dolgoročnih pogodb, ob sočasnem omogočanju lažjega prehoda na morebitna nova pravila o poreklu blaga za SSP.
The provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000, in particular the existence of quantitative limits, which apply on an annual basis, reflecting the Community market’s capacity to absorb the Nepalese products, Nepal’s export capacity and actual recorded trade flows, were designed to prevent injury to the corresponding branches of Community industry.
Določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1615/2000, zlasti o količinskih omejitvah, ki se uporabljajo na letni osnovi in kažejo zmogljivost trga Skupnosti, da sprejme nepalske proizvode, izvozno zmogljivost Nepala in dejanske evidentirane trgovinske tokove, so bile sestavljene z namenom, da preprečijo oškodovanje ustreznih industrijskih vej v Skupnosti.
However, in order to ensure fair treatment both for Nepal and for other least developed countries, the continuing need for the derogation should be reviewed once any new rules of origin are adopted in the context of the new generalised system of preferences.
Vendar, da bi bilo zagotovljeno pošteno obravnavanje tako Nepala kot drugih manj razvitih držav, je treba znova preveriti stalno potrebo po odstopanju, ko se enkrat sprejmejo nova pravila o poreklu blaga, v kontekstu novega splošnega sistema preferencialov.
Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Uredbo (ES) št. 1615/2000 ustrezno spremeniti.
Regulation (EC) No 1615/2000 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 1615/2000 se spremeni na naslednji način:
in Article 2, ‘31 December 2004’ is replaced by ‘31 December 2006’, and
V členu 2 se „31. decembra 2004“ nadomesti z „31. decembra 2006“;
‘The continuing need for the derogation shall however be reviewed not later than 31 December 2005, in accordance with the new provisions to be adopted with regard to the generalised system of preferences and the rules of origin related thereto.’
„Stalna potreba po odstopanju se znova preveri najpozneje do 31. decembra 2005 v skladu z novimi določbami, ki se sprejmejo v zvezi z splošnim sistemom preferencialov in z njim povezanimi pravili o poreklu blaga.“
Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of accession.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1828/2004 (OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 23).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1828/2004 (UL L 321, 22.10.2004, str. 23).
OJ L 185, 25.7.2000, p. 54.
UL L 185, 25.7.2000, str. 54.
OJ L 46, 16.2.2002, p. 16.
UL L 46, 16.2.2002, str. 16.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2189/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2189/2004
fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2005 accounting year of the farm accountancy data network
o določitvi standardnega plačila na poročilo s kmetijskega gospodarstva za obračunsko leto 2005 v okviru mreže računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev
Having regard to Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Economic Community [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 79/65/EGS z dne 15. junija 1965 o vzpostavitvi mreže za zbiranje računovodskih podatkov o dohodkih in poslovanju kmetijskih gospodarstev v Evropski gospodarski skupnosti [1],
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 of 13 July 1983 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings [2], and in particular Article 5(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 1915/83 z dne 13. julija 1983 o nekaterih podrobnih pravilih glede vodenja knjigovodstva za določitev dohodkov kmetijskih gospodarstev [2] in zlasti člena 5(3) Uredbe
Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 provides that a standard fee shall be paid by the Commission to the Member States for each duly completed farm return forwarded to it within the period prescribed in Article 3 of that Regulation.
Člen 5(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1915/83 predvideva standardno plačilo Komisije državi članici za vsako ustrezno izpolnjeno poročilo s kmetijskega gospodarstva, ki ji je poslano v obdobju, predpisanem v členu 3 te uredbe.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 134/2004 [3] fixed the amount of the standard fee for the 2004 accounting year at EUR 140 per farm return. The trend in costs and its effects on the cost of completing the farm return justify a revision of the fee.
Z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 134/2004 [3] je bilo določeno standardno plačilo za poročilo s kmetijskega gospodarstva za obračunsko leto 2004 v višini 140 EUR. Zaradi gibanja stroškov in njihovega vpliva na stroške izpolnjevanja poročila s kmetijskega gospodarstva je sprememba višine plačila upravičena.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Community Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora Skupnosti za mrežo računovodskih podatkov s kmetijskih gospodarstev –
The standard fee provided for in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 shall be fixed at EUR 142.
Določi se standardno plačilo, predvideno v členu 5(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 1915/83, v višini 142 EUR.
It shall apply for the 2005 accounting year.
Uporablja se v obračunskem letu 2005.
Regulation last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 660/2004 (OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p. 97).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 660/2004 (UL L 104, 8.4.2004, str. 97).
Regulation amended by Regulation (EC) No 1388/2004 (OJ L 255, 31.7.2004, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1388/2004 (UL L 255, 31.7.2004, str. 5).
OJ L 21, 28.1.2004, p. 8.
UL L 21, 28.1.2004, str. 8.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2190/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2190/2004
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 of 28 October 1996 on the common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables [1], and in particular Article 48 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2200/96 z dne 28. oktobra 1996 o skupni ureditvi trga za sadje in zelenjavo [1] in predvsem člena 48 Uredbe,
Article 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 [2] provides that producer organisations already recognised are to submit their operational programmes to the competent national authority for approval.
Člen 11 Uredbe Komisije [2] (ES) št. 1433/2003 določa, da že priznane organizacije proizvajalcev predložijo svoje operativne programe v odobritev pristojnemu nacionalnemu organu.
Producer groups applying for recognition under Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 should also be explicitly allowed to submit their operational programmes at the same time.
Skupinam proizvajalcev, ki zaprosijo za priznanje v zvezi s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2200/96, bi bilo zato treba izrecno dovoliti, da istočasno predložijo tudi svoje operativne programe.
Those programmes may not be approved unless the producer organisation in question has been recognised by the national authority no later than the final date laid down in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003.
Ti programi so lahko odobreni le v primeru, da je bila zadevana organizacija proizvajalcev priznana s strani nacionalnega organa najkasneje do končnega datuma, določenega v členu 13(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1433/2003.
Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 provide that the competent national authority is to take decisions on programmes and funds or amendments thereto, following submission by the producer organisations in accordance with Articles 11 and 14 of that Regulation, no later than the final date of 15 December.
Člena 13 in 14 Uredbe (ES) št. 1433/2003 določata, da pristojen nacionalni organ odloča o programih in skladih ali o njihovih spremembah na osnovi predstavitve, ki so jo izvedle organizacije proizvajalcev v skladu s členom 11 in 14 navedene uredbe, najkasneje do končnega datuma, ki je 15. decembra.
In view of the experience gained over the last few years, as a result of administrative overload, some Member States are unable to examine all the programmes or take decisions on them by that date.
Po izkušnjah iz preteklih let nekatere države članice zaradi preobremenjenosti administracije do tega datuma ne zmorejo preučiti vseh programov in o njih odločati.
Instead of applying systematic derogations, and in order not to harm traders and to allow the national authorities to continue examining applications, the Member States should be allowed, for duly justified reasons, to postpone the final date of 15 December to 20 January of the year following that in which the application is submitted.
Da bi se izognili uporabi sistematičnih odstopanj in ne bi škodovali trgovcem ter da bi nacionalnim organom omogočili, da nadaljujejo s preučevanjem teh vlog, je treba državam članicam v primeru utemeljenih razlogov dovoliti, da prestavijo končni datum s 15. decembra na 20. januar tistega leta, ki sledi oddaji vloge.
Member States should be able to allow expenditure to be eligible from 1 January of the year following the application.
Države članice lahko sprejmejo določbe o upravičenosti izdatkov od 1. januarja tistega leta, ki sledi oddaji vloge.
Regulation (EC) No 1433/2003 should be amended accordingly.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1433/2003 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
the following paragraph is added to Article 11:
V člen 11 se doda pododstavek:
‘Producer groups applying for recognition as producer organisations under Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 may at the same time submit the operational programmes referred to in the first paragraph for approval.
„Skupine proizvajalcev, ki želijo biti priznane kot organizacije proizvajalcev iz člena 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2200/96, lahko istočasno predložijo v odobritev operativne programe iz prvega pododstavka.
Approval of those programmes shall be subject to obtainment of recognition no later than the final date laid down in Article 13(2).’;
Pogoj za odobritev programov je pridobitev priznanja najkasneje do končnega datuma, določenega v členu 13(2).“
the following subparagraph is added to Article 13(2):
V člen 13(2) se doda pododstavek:
‘However, for duly justified reasons, Member States may take a decision on operational programmes and funds not later than 20 January following the date of the application.
„Kljub temu lahko države članice iz utemeljenih razlogov odločajo o operativnih programih in skladih najkasneje do 20. januarja, ki sledi oddaji vloge.
The approval decision may stipulate that expenditure is eligible from 1 January of the year following the application.’;
V odobritvi je lahko določeno, da so izdatki upravičeni od 1. januarja tistega leta, ki sledi oddaji vloge.“
the following subparagraph is added to Article 14(3):
V člen 14(3) se doda pododstavek:
‘However, for duly justified reasons, Member States may take a decision on amendments to operational programmes not later than 20 January following the date of the application.
„Kljub temu lahko države članice iz utemeljenih razlogov odločajo o spremembah operativnega programa najkasneje do 20. januarja, ki sledi oddaji vloge.
the following subparagraph is added to Article 16(2):
V člen 16(2) se doda pododstavek:
‘Where Article 13(2) or Article 14(3) are applied, and notwithstanding the first and second subparagraphs, the implementation of operational programmes approved in accordance with these provisions shall commence not later than 31 January following their approval.’;
„V primeru uporabe člena 13(2) ali člena 14(3) in z odstopanjem od prvega in drugega pododstavka, se začne operativni program, ki je bil odobren v skladu s temi določbami, izvajati najkasneje 31. januarja, ki sledi njegovi odobritvi.“
the third paragraph of Article 17 is replaced by the following:
V členu 17 se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjima pododstavkoma:
‘Where Article 13(2) or Article 14(3) are applied, and notwithstanding the second subparagraph, Member States shall give notification of the approved amount of aid not later than 20 January.
„V primeru uporabe člena 13(2) ali člena 14(3) in z odstopanjem od drugega pododstavka lahko države članice uradno obvestijo o višini odobrene pomoči najkasneje do 20. januarja.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission not later than 31 January the total amount of aid approved for all operational programmes.’
Države članice sporočijo Komisiji skupen znesek odobrene pomoči za vse operativne programe najkasneje do 31. januarja.“
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1813/2004 (OJ L 319, 20.10.2004, p. 5).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1813/2004 (UL L 319, 20.10.2004, str. 5).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2191/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2191/2004
to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the export refunds on cereals and on wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2004 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za žita, pšenično in rženo moko, drobljenec in zdrob
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2192/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2192/2004
to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2004 o določitvi korekcijskega zneska za izvozno nadomestilo za žita
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2193/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2193/2004
to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the export refunds on malt
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2004 o določitvi izvoznih nadomestil za slad
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2194/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2194/2004
Done at Brussels, 20 December 2004.
V Bruslju 20. decembra 2004
to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on malt
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2004 o določitvi korekcijskega zneska za nadomestilo za slad
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2195/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2195/2004
to the Commission Regulation of 20 December 2004 fixing the refunds applicable to cereal and rice sector products supplied as Comunity and national food aid
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 20. decembra 2004 o določitvi nadomestil za proizvode v sektorjih žit in riža, dobavljene v okviru ukrepov Skupnosti in nacionalnih ukrepov za pomoč v hrani
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2196/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2196/2004
It shall apply from 22 December 2004 to 4 January 2005.
Uporablja se od 22. decembra 2004 do 4. januarja 2005.