natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, with the agreement of the insolvency administrator, on 30 September 2002 HGG, the minority partner of GGB and GGF, was taken out of the Herlitz Group and the majority partnership rights of Herlitz PBS AG were turned into minority ownership shares of EUR 1 million in both GGB and GGF.
Končno so s soglasjem stečajnega upravitelja 30. septembra 2002 HGG, manjšinskega partnerja GGB in GGF, izločili iz Skupine Herlitz, pravice večinskega partnerja Herlitza PBS AG pa so spremenili v manjšinske lastniške deleže v vrednosti enega milijona EUR v podjetjih GGB in GGF.
Accordingly, under German law [7], the Herlitz Group is no longer the majority owner of these real estate companies.
Zaradi tega Skupina Herlitz po nemškem pravu [7] ni več večinska lastnica teh nepremičninskih družb.
Another investment misjudgement by the Herlitz Group was entering the paper and paper processing business through the acquisition of a Russian paper factory.
Slaba naložba Skupine je bil tudi nakup ruske papirnice in s tem vstop na trg prodaje in predelave papirja.
However, due to the collapse of the paper market in the Commonwealth of Independent States, the investment led to losses of about EUR 50 million. Further investments in western Europe such as the distribution businesses in Portugal, France and Austria were unsuccessful and resulted in losses of some EUR 10 to 15 million. The total loss from all the failed investments thus amounts to about EUR 175 to 180 million. It is worth noting that throughout this period the core business of the Herlitz Group was still producing positive results, although not enough to cover the losses from the other investments.
Zaradi zloma papirniškega trga v Skupnosti neodvisnih držav je ta naložba privedla do izgube v višini okoli 50 milijonov EUR. Neuspešne so bile tudi nadaljnje naložbe v zahodni Evropi, kot na primer prodaje na Portugalskem, v Franciji in v Avstriji, ki so privedle do izgub v višini med 10 in 15 milijoni EUR. S tem je zaradi slabih naložb nastala skupna izguba v višini med 175 in 180 milijoni EUR. Poudariti je treba, da je jedro dejavnosti Skupine Herlitz v tem časovnem obdobju prinašalo pozitivne rezultate, ki pa niso zadoščali za pokritje izgub iz naložb.
The ‘old’ measures
„Stari“ ukrepi
In 1989, the Land of Berlin, through Liegenschaftsfonds Berlin GmbH & Co. KG (Liegenschaftsfonds), offered Herlitz AG the use of real estate in Berlin-Tegel on the former industrial premises of Borsig.
Leta 1989 je zvezna dežela Berlin prek Liegenschaftsfonds Berlin GmbH & Co. KG (Liegenschaftsfonds) Herlitzu AG ponudila v uporabo zemljišče na nekdanji industrijski lokaciji Borsig v Berlin Teglu.
Liegenschaftsfonds is a fully owned company of the Land of Berlin entrusted with the administration of State-owned real estate properties.
Liegenschaftsfonds je družba za upravljanje z nepremičninami, ki so v lasti dežele Berlin.
The Land of Berlin remained the owner of the real estate but granted an emphyteutic lease (Erbbaurecht) on the land to the Herlitz Group, which undertook to pay a ground rent (Erbbauzinsen) to the Land of Berlin until 30 April 2053.
Za zemljišče na lokaciji Tegel je Skupina Herlitz od dežele Berlin pridobila dedno stavbno pravico in se zavezala, da bo do 30. aprila 2053 plačevala najemnino za zemljišče.
The ground rent amounted to 3 % of the value of the land, which could vary throughout the duration of the contract.
Najemnina za zemljišče je znašala 3 odstotke vrednosti zemljišča, ki bi se med trajanjem pogodbe lahko spremenila.
The Herlitz Group built an office building and a production plant designed to meet the group’s needs on the Berlin-Tegel site.
Skupina je za svoje potrebe na lokaciji Tegel zgradila poslovno stavbo s proizvodnim obratom.
The buildings erected on the leased land were the property of the Herlitz Group and when they were sold to GGB, the emphyteusis on the land was transferred with them.
Zgradbe, ki so nastale na najetem zemljišču, so postale last Skupine Herlitz. S prodajo zgradb podjetju GGB se je prenesla tudi dedna stavbna pravica.
The ground rent was paid as agreed by the Herlitz Group until March 2002 and by GGB as of [8] October 2002.
V skladu z dogovorom je do marca 2002 dajatve plačevala Skupina, od [8] oktobra 2002 pa GGB.
Moreover, in 1989 Herlitz AG received an unsecured and interest-free loan of EUR 3,07 million (DEM 6 million) for 10 years from the Land of Berlin linked to the transfer of its plants from Berlin-Moabit and Berlin-Spandau to the Berlin-Tegel site (hereinafter referred to as the loan for the move) (Umzugsdarlehen).
Leta 1989 je Herlitz AG od dežele Berlin prejel nezavarovano brezobrestno posojilo za dobo 10 let v višini 6 milijonov DEM (3,07 milijona EUR) za preselitev obratov iz Moabita in Spandaua v Tegel (v nadaljevanju „posojilo za preselitev“).
On 17 November 1999, shortly before the deadline for the repayment of the loan for the move, the Land of Berlin deferred the repayment of the loan until 31 December 2004.
novembra 1999 je dežela Berlin, tik pred rokom za odplačilo posojila za preselitev, odložila plačilo na 31. december 2004.
In return for the deferral the Land of Berlin applied an interest rate on the loan amounting to the base rate of the European Central Bank plus 2 %.
V zameno za odlog je dežela Berlin zvišala obrestno mero posojila za 2 % na osnovno obrestno mero Evropske centralne banke.
As security, on 23 November 1999, Herlitz AG signed a notarial deed containing an acknowledgment of debt in favour of the Land of Berlin for the amount of EUR 3,67 million (DEM 7,185 million) which equals the original amount of the loan for the move plus the expected amount of the cumulated interest, EUR 0,606 million (DEM 1,185 million).
Kot jamstvo je Herlitz AG 23. novembra 1999 podpisal notarsko listino o priznanju dolga do dežele Berlin višini 7,185 milijona DEM (3,67 milijona EUR), kar je ustrezalo prvotnemu znesku posojila za preselitev skupaj s pričakovanimi obrestmi v višini 1,185 milijona DEM (0,606 milijona EUR).
Furthermore, the notarial deed established a land charge (Grundschuld) only for the amount of the cumulated interest, on the emphyteusis that Herlitz AG enjoyed on the land in Berlin-Tegel.
Poleg tega je notarska listina urejala le osnovni dolg za znesek nakopičenih obresti za dedno stavbno pravico Herlitza AG za zemljišče v Berlin Teglu.
Nevertheless, this land charge was lower-ranking to the land charge registered for banks on the same emphyteusis right.
Vendar pa je bil ta osnovni dolg podrejen osnovnemu dolgu, ki velja za banke v primeru iste dedne gradbene pravice.
Neither the granting of the loan for the move in 1989 nor its deferral in 1999 are covered by an aid scheme and neither measure was notified to the Commission.
Niti odobritev posojila za preselitev leta 1989 niti podaljšanje roka leta 1999 nista zajeta v programu pomoči; Komisija ni bila seznanjena z nobenim izmed teh ukrepov.
The rescue aid loan
Sanacijsko posojilo
By contract of 10 May 2002 between the insolvency administrator of Herlitz PBS AG and ILB, the bank granted Herlitz PBS AG a loan amounting to some EUR 930232 (hereinafter referred to as the rescue aid loan).
S pogodbo, sklenjeno 10. maja 2002 s stečajnim upraviteljem, je ILB Herlitzu PBS AG odobrila posojilo v višini 930232 EUR (v nadaljevanju „sanacijsko posojilo“).
By letter dated 29 May 2002 this amount was increased to EUR 963855,42.
Z dopisom z dne 29. maja 2002 so ta znesek zvišali na 963855,42 EUR.
The rescue aid loan was intended to ensure the fulfilment of a sales contract between Herlitz PBS AG and FOP.
Sanacijsko posojilo je bilo namenjeno izpolnitvi kupne pogodbe med Herlitzom PBS AG in FOP.
FOP had delivered goods to Herlitz PBS AG but received no payment, which threatened its liquidity.
FOP je Herlitzu PBS AG dostavil blago, vendar ni prejel plačila, s čimer je bila ogrožena njegova likvidnost.
The rescue aid loan was granted at an annual interest rate of 7,5 % and had to be reimbursed within six months after its disbursement.
Sanacijsko posojilo je bilo odobreno z letno obrestno mero 7,5 %, vrniti pa ga je bilo potrebno v šestih mesecih od datuma izplačila.
The full amount of the loan was disbursed on 24 July 2002. The loan was secured by assignment of claims (Abtretung der Rückgewährungsansprüche) of FOP amounting to EUR 2,5 million as well as land charges (auf dem Betriebsgrundstück eingetragene Grundschulden) amounting to EUR 13549234,85 on the real estate of FOP. The loan was fully repaid with interest to ILB on 24 January 2003.
Posojilo je bilo v celoti izplačano dne 24. julija 2002 in zavarovano z odstopom od zahtev po poplačilu dolga FOP v višini 2,5 milijona EUR in z vpisom osnovnega dolga na nepremičnine FOP v višini 13549234,85 EUR. Posojilo je bilo ILB z obrestmi vrnjeno 24. januarja 2003.
Restructuring through insolvency plans (Insolvenzpläne)
Prestrukturiranje s stečajnimi načrti
General description of the insolvency plans
Stečajni načrti
Germany has provided two parallel insolvency plans: one for Herlitz PBS AG and another for Herlitz AG, both dated 15 July 2002.
Nemčija je predložila stečajna načrta za Herlitz PBS AG in Herlitz AG. Oba načrta nosita datum 15. julij 2002.
These insolvency plans are the restructuring or rather the recapitalisation plans (Sanierungspläne) of the Herlitz Group.
Stečajna načrta sta sanacijska načrta oziroma načrta rekapitalizacije Skupine Herlitz.
The plans provide for the reduction of capacities, the hive-off of company property, the closing of unprofitable subsidiaries, the reduction of negative operating results, measures to reduce costs and optimise distribution and the search for a strategic partner.
Sestavni deli sanacijskih načrtov so zmanjšanje kapacitet, odsvojitev nepremičnin podjetja, zaprtje nerentabilnih hčerinskih družb, zniževanje negativnih rezultatov podjetja, ukrepi za znižanje stroškov in optimizacija prodaje ter iskanje strateškega partnerja.
In addition, the plans aim to reduce both companies’ pending debts through partial and full waivers of non-secured debts and a contribution from the workforce.
Poleg tega načrti predvidevajo zmanjšanje dolgov obeh podjetij s pomočjo delnega ali popolnega odpisa nezavarovanih dolgov ter s prispevki zaposlenih.
Both insolvency plans applied the methodology of maintaining the going concern through an insolvency plan (Sanierung durch Insolvenzplan), in accordance with the German Insolvency Statute [9].
Oba stečajna načrta sta vključevala sanacijo s pomočjo nadaljevanja dejavnosti podjetja v skladu z nemškim stečajnim zakonom [9].
The Insolvency Statute, in force since 1 January 1999, provides for the option of rescuing a company by keeping the existing management and satisfying the creditors from the income created after the insolvency proceedings have been terminated.
Stečajni zakon, ki velja od 1. januarja 1999, vsebuje možnost reševanja podjetja s pomočjo ohranitve vodstva podjetja in poplačilom upnikov iz dohodkov, ki nastanejo po zaključku stečajnega postopka.
In the Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG proceedings, this appeared to be the solution best suited to satisfying the creditors.
V postopkih proti Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG se je ta rešitev izkazala kot najboljša za zadovoljitev upnikov.
Accordingly, the insolvency administrator and the creditors rejected the options of selling the entire company (übertragende Sanierung) or liquidating the company and selling assets separately (Zerschlagung).
Zato so se stečajni upravitelj in upniki odpovedali možnosti prodaje celotnega podjetja (prenesena sanacija) ali likvidaciji podjetja in ločeni prodaji premoženja (razbitje).
The two plans have a similar methodology but apply different solutions, due to the different asset structure of Herlitz PBS AG and Herlitz AG.
Oba načrta imata podobno metodologijo, vendar pa zaradi različne strukture premoženja Herlitza PBS AG in Herlitza AG predlagata različne rešitve.
However, the restructuring through the insolvency plan of Herlitz AG was conditional upon the fulfilment of the insolvency plan for Herlitz PBS AG.
Prestrukturiranje Herlitza AG s stečajnim načrtom je bilo odvisno od izpolnitve stečajnega načrta za Herlitz PBS AG.
Both plans divided the creditors of each company into groups that were supposed to contain creditors with comparable claims.
V obeh načrtih so upnike vsakega podjetja razdelili v skupine v primerljivimi terjatvami.
According to Article 222 of the Insolvency Statute, there are three types of creditors that take part in insolvency proceedings:
V skladu s členom 222 stečajnega zakona lahko pri stečajnem postopku sodelujejo trije razredi upnikov:
the creditors entitled to separate satisfaction if their rights are encroached upon by the plan;
upniki, ki imajo izločitveno pravico, če sem jim z načrtom kratijo pravice;
the non-lower-ranking creditors;
nepodrejeni upniki;
lower-ranking creditors unless their claims are deemed to be waived.
podrejeni upniki, ki svojih terjatev niso odpisali.
These are further divided into groups of creditors with equal rights.
Te skupine se nadalje delijo v skupine upnikov z enakimi pravicami.
Once groups have been created, no individual settlements can take place that would differentiate between parts of each creditor group.
Po razporeditvi v skupine ne more priti do individualnih poravnav, ki bi ločevale med deli posamezne skupine upnikov.
In the insolvency proceedings of both Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG, creditors with a right to separate satisfaction participated, but their claims were satisfied to the extent that they were covered by such a right.
V stečajnih postopkih proti Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG je bilo zahtevam upnikov z izločitvenimi pravicami zadoščeno v skladu z njihovimi zahtevami.
Germany submitted that in the insolvency proceedings of Herlitz AG and Herlitz PBS AG all insolvency costs (Massekosten) and debts of the insolvency assets (Masseverbindlichkeiten) were paid in full.
Nemčija je sporočila, da so bili v postopkih proti Herlitzu AG in Herlitzu PBS AG plačani vsi stroški stečajne mase in vse stečajne obveznosti.
A part of these claims were public sales tax claims (Umsatzsteuer).
Del teh terjatev je bil prometni davek.
In insolvency proceedings of the going-concern type, the payment of all these privileged claims is a precondition for the successful closure of the procedure.
Pri stečajnih postopkih proti še vedno delujočemu podjetju je poravnava prednostnih terjatev predpogoj za uspešen zaključek postopka.
The debts of the insolvency assets were paid immediately as they arose and no separate list of these claims was made.
Stečajne obveznosti so bile poravnane takoj, ko so nastale; ločen seznam teh terjatev ni bil sestavljen.
Only hypothetical lists of insolvency costs and debts of the insolvency assets were prepared to illustrate the possible outcomes of liquidation and asset sale procedures.
Pripravljeni pa so bili hipotetični seznami stroškov stečajne mase in stečajnih obveznosti, da bi lahko prikazali možen rezultat likvidacije in prodaje premoženja.
Creditor groups in the insolvency plan for Herlitz AG
Skupine upnikov v stečajnem načrtu za Herlitz AG
In the insolvency proceedings for Herlitz AG, the classification of the insolvency claims was as follows:
V stečajnem postopku za Herlitz AG so bile stečajne terjatve razdeljene kot sledi:
creditors entitled to separate satisfaction: no formal group of these creditors was drawn up.
Upniki z izločitveno pravico: sestavljena ni bila nobena ustrezna skupina.
Nevertheless, a right to separate satisfaction secured the full claims of the mortgage banks Hypovereinsbank and Eurohypo [10], but only a part of the claims of group HAG 1 below;
Izločitvena pravica je zavarovala vse terjatve banke Hypovereinsbank in banke Eurohypo [10], a le del terjatev Skupine HAG 1;
insolvency costs and debts of the insolvency assets: no formal group of these creditors was drawn up and these claims were paid in full as soon as they arose;
Stroški stečajne mase in stečajne obveznosti: Sestavljena ni bila nobena ustrezna skupina, terjatve pa so bile poravnane takoj, ko so nastale.
non-lower-ranking creditors:
Nepodrejeni upniki:
group HAG 1: group of banks with a right to separate satisfaction on part of their claims from the movable property and shareholdings of Herlitz AG,
skupina HAG 1: skupina bank z izločitveno pravico za del terjatev iz premičnega premoženja in za delež v Herlitzu AG,
group HAG 2: other non-lower-ranking creditors not belonging to group HAG 1,
skupina HAG 2: drugi nepodrejeni upniki, ki ne pripadajo skupini HAG 1,
group HAG 3: tax authority of Berlin,
skupina HAG 3: berlinski davčni organ,
group HAG 4: connected undertakings;
skupina HAG 4: povezana podjetja;
lower-ranking creditors:
Podrejeni upniki:
group HAG 5: interests, costs, fines etc.
skupina HAG 5: obresti, stroški, globe itd.
The lower-ranking claims in group HAG 5 were cancelled by the insolvency plan in accordance with Article 225 of the Insolvency Statute.
Podrejene terjatve v skupini HAG 5 bile izbrisane iz stečajnega načrta v skladu s členom 225 stečajnega zakona.
The non-lower-ranking groups HAG 3 and HAG 4 waived all their claims with effect from 15 July 2002 [11].
Nepodrejeni skupini HAG 3 in HAG 4 sta odpisali svoje terjatve z začetkom veljavnosti 15. julija 2002 [11].
The claims and the amounts waived by creditors are set out in rounded figures in the following table:
V naslednji tabeli so navedene terjatve in vsote, ki so jih upniki odpisali (zaokrožene vrednosti):
(public or private creditor)
(zasebni in javni)
Description of claim
Opis terjatev
Security of claim
Jamstvo terjatve
Claims in EUR million
Terjatve v mio EUR
Waived claims in EUR million
Odpis terjatev v mio EUR
Banks with right to separate satisfaction (public and private)
Banke z izločitvenimi pravicami (javni in zasebni upniki)
Credits dating from before 3 April 2002
Krediti iz obdobja pred 3. aprilom 2002
Right to separate satisfaction from movables
Izločitvene pravice na premičnine
Former management and employees (private)
Nekdanje vodstvo in zaposleni (zasebni)
Future pension claims, salary for the period before 3 April 2002, redundancy payment
Prihodnji zahtevki za pokojnine, plače za obdobje pred 3. aprilom 2002, odpravnine
None
Ga ni
Lessor of grounds at Spandau (private)
Najemodajalec zemljišča Spandau (zasebni)
Rent, damages for termination of contract
Plačilo najemnine; odškodnina zaradi prekinitve pogodbe
Suppliers (private)
Dobavitelji (zasebni)
Claims from supplies and services before 3 April 2002, damages for termination of contract
Dobave in storitve pred 3. aprilom 2002; pogodbene terjatve za odškodnine
Mutual Insurance Association (public)
Zavod za pokojninsko zavarovanje (javni)
Future pension claims
Prihodnji zahtevki za pokojnine
Federal Employment Agency (public)
Zvezni urad za zaposlovanje (javni)
Claim for compensation of the insolvency benefit paid to employees (1 January 2002 to 4 June 2002)
Zahtevek za povračilo stečajnih prejemkov, ki so bili plačali zaposlenim (1. januar 2002–4. junij 2002)
Health Insurance Funds (public)
Bolniška blagajna (javni)
Contributions for the period (5 March 2002 to 4 June 2002)
Prispevki v obdobju med 5. marcem 2002 in 4. junijem 2002
Tax authority of Alfeld (public)
Finančni urad Alfeld (javni)
Tax on the sale of real estate from the sale of an ownership share before 2002
Davek iz prodaje lastninskega deleža pred letom 2002
Liegenschaftsfonds (public)
Liegenschaftsfonds (javni)
Rent interest for Berlin-Spandau
Zahtevek za plačilo obresti za najemnino za Berlin–Spandau
Overall waivers in group HAG 2: EUR 0,5 million quota was distributed according to the size of the claims, and the remaining part of the claims was waived
Odpis terjatev v skupini HAG 2: kvota v višini 0,5 milijona EUR je bila razdeljena glede na obseg terjatev, preostali del terjatev pa je bil odpisan.
Tax authority of Berlin (public)
Berlinski davčni urad (javni)
Trade tax, corporate income tax and sales tax for the period ending 5 June 2002
Davek na plače in prihodke iz obdobja do 5. junija 2002
Overall waivers in group HAG 3: 100 % of the claims was waived
Odpis terjatev v skupini HAG 3: odpisanih je bilo 100 % terjatev.
Connected undertakings (private)
Povezana podjetja (zasebni)
All claims against Herlitz AG
Vse terjatve do Herlitza AG
Lower-ranking creditors (private or public)
Podrejeni upniki (zasebni in javni)
Interests, costs, fines etc.
Obresti, stroški, takse itd.
Not specified
Ni podatkov
Creditor groups in the insolvency plan for Herlitz PBS AG
Skupine upnikov v stečajnem načrtu za Herlitz PBS AG
The classification of the creditors in the insolvency proceedings for Herlitz PBS AG was as follows:
Upniki v stečajnem postopku za Herlitz PBS AG so bili razdeljeni kot sledi:
creditors entitled to separate satisfaction:
Upniki z izločitveno pravico:
group PBS 1: a right to separate satisfaction secured the full claims of certain suppliers,
Skupina PBS 1: izločitvena pravica je zavarovala vse terjatve določenih dobaviteljev.
group PBS 6: banks with right to separate satisfaction on part of their claims. The mortgage banks Hypovereinsbank and Eurohypo had also rights to separate satisfaction but were not included in group PBS 6;
Skupina PBS 6: banke z izločitvenimi pravicami za del svojih terjatev; banki Hypovereinsbank in Eurohypo sta prav tako imeli izločitveno pravico, vendar v to skupino nista bili vključeni.
group PBS 2: employees
skupina PBS 2: zaposleni,
group PBS 3: some of the public creditors such as tax authorities, Federal Employment Agency, Health Insurance Funds (Krankenkassen), Land of Berlin
skupina PBS 3: nekaj javnih upnikov, kot so davčni uradi, Zvezni urad za zaposlovanje, bolniške blagajne, zvezna dežela Berlin,
group PBS 4: connected undertakings
skupina PBS 4: povezana podjetja,
group PBS 5: other non-lower-ranking creditors such as former management and executive employees, the Employer’s Liability Insurance Association (Berufsgenossenschaft), the Mutual Insurance Association (Pensionssicherungsverein), private leasing banks, Austrian Post, Main Customs Office etc.;
skupina PBS 5: drugi nepodrejeni upniki, kot na primer nekdanje vodstvo in zaposleni, poklicni sindikat, zavod za pokojninsko zavarovanje, zasebne kreditne banke, Avstrijska pošta, glavni carinski urad itd.
group PBS 7: interests, costs, fines etc.
skupina PBS 7: obresti, stroški, takse itd.
The lower-ranking claims in group PBS 7 were cancelled by the insolvency plan in accordance with Article 225 of the Insolvency Statute.
Podrejene terjatve v skupini PBS 7 so bile izbrisane iz stečajnega načrta v skladu s členom 225 stečajnega zakona.
The non-lower-ranking groups PBS 3 and PBS 4 waived all their claims with effect from 15 July 2002.
Nepodrejeni skupini PBS 3 in PBS 4 sta odpisali svoje terjatve z začetkom veljavnosti dne 15. julija 2002.
The non-lower-ranking claims and the amounts waived by creditors are set out in rounded figures in the following table:
V naslednji tabeli so navedene terjatve in vsote, ki so jih upniki odpisali (zaokrožene vrednosti):
Creditors of Herlitz PBS AG
Upniki Herlitza PBS AG
Suppliers with right to separate satisfaction (private)
Dobavitelji z izločitveno pravico (zasebni)
Claims from supplies and services before 3 April 2002
Terjatve iz dobav in storitev pred 3. aprilom 2002
Employees (private)
Zaposleni (zasebni)
Future salary claims
Prihodnji zahtevki za plače
[40 to 50] */year
[40–50] */leto
[2 to 4] * in 2002 [4 to 5] */year from 2003
[2–4] * v letu 2002 [4–5] */leto od 2003
Corporate income tax March 2002
Davek od plač marec 2002
Real estate tax for the period January-March 2002
Zemljiški davek od januarja do marca 2002
Real estate tax for 1996
Davek na nakup nepremičnine za leto 1996
Claim for compensation of the insolvency benefit paid to employees (1 April 2002 to 4 June 2002)
Zahtevek za povračilo stečajnih prejemkov, ki so bili plačani zaposlenim (1. april 2002 – 4. junij 2002)
Contributions for the period 5 March 2002 to 4 June 2002
Prispevki iz obdobja od 5. marca 2002 do 4. junija 2002
Ground rent for the period April to June 2002
Dajatve za dedno stavbno pravico za obdobje od aprila do junija 2002
Lower-ranking land charge
Podrejen osnovni dolg
Land of Berlin (public)
Zvezna dežela Berlin (javni)
Claim for repayment of loan for the move
Zahteva za povračilo posojila za preselitev