natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some elements in the Commission decisions indicate, indeed, that intra-EU matching was not authorised under these decisions:
Nekateri elementi odločb Komisije odražajo, da v njih ni bilo odobreno dodeljevanje vsebinsko enake pomoči med državami članicami EU:
firstly, the statement expressed in the Commission’s decision approving the scheme that ‘requests for subsidies will be turned down if they are in contravention of the EEC Treaty’ meant not only that the scheme had to be approved by the Commission, but also that the application of the scheme had to be in conformity with the general provisions of the EEC Treaty;
prvič mora biti pomen izjave iz odločbe Komisije o odobritvi sheme, da „bodo prošnje za subvencije zavrnjene, če bodo v nasprotju s pogodbo EGS,“ upoštevan zunaj samega procesa odobritve sheme, točneje kot dodatni pogoj;
The Dutch authorities have claimed that the Commission should not have opened the formal investigation procedure against an aid granted on the basis of an approved scheme.
Nizozemski organi trdijo, da Komisija ne bi smela začeti formalnega preiskovalnega postopka proti pomoči, ki je bila zagotovljena na osnovi odobrene sheme.
Instead the Commission should have presented the Netherlands with a recommendation for appropriate measures.
Namesto tega bi morala Komisija posredovati Nizozemski priporočilo za uvedbo ustreznih ukrepov.
On this issue the Commission notes that it was the Netherlands that notified the aid.
Glede tega problema je Komisija mnenja, da je bila prav Nizozemska tista, ki je priglasila pomoč.
Therefore, even though an aid scheme existed at the time of the notification, to which the Netherlands refers, it was the notification by the Netherlands that led the Commission to procedurally handle this case as an ad hoc case and not as an individual application of a scheme.
Iz tega sledi, da ne glede na to, da je shema pomoči obstajala v času priglasitve, na katero se omenjena država sklicuje, je bila priglasitev Nizozemske povod za proceduralno obravnavo tega primera s strani Komisije kot ad hoc primera in ne kot individualnega izvajanja sheme.
In addition, since the aid does not fall within a scheme as approved by the Commission, it had to be individually notified and the Commission had the duty to open the procedure under Article 88(2) of the Treaty in case of doubts on its compatibility with the common market.
Zaradi tega, ker zadevna pomoč ne spada v shemo, ki jo je odobrila Komisija, jo je potrebno priglasiti individualno, Komisija pa je v primeru dvomov o njeni nezdružljivosti s skupnim trgom odgovorna, da začne ustrezne postopke iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
Proof of illegal aid to match
Dokaz o nelegalni pomoči, za katero naj bi se dodelila vsebinsko enaka pomoč
Furthermore, the Commission is of the opinion that all of the conditions of the BSE scheme have not been fulfilled in the present case and that, in particular, sufficient proof of the existence of illegal Spanish aid was not provided.
Poleg tega je Komisija mnenja, da v zadevnem primeru ni bilo zadoščeno več pogojem sheme BSE in zlasti da ni zadostnih dokazov o obstoju vsebinsko enake, nelegalne španske pomoči.
In this respect the comments from the Netherlands and the potential beneficiaries do not alleviate the doubts expressed in the opening decision.
V tem pogledu pripombe Nizozemske in morebitnih upravičencev ne ublažijo dvomov, ki so bili izraženi v prvotni odločbi.
The Commission considers that the Spanish authorities have clearly denied that the aid would ever be available.
Komisija meni, da so španski organi jasno zanikali, da bo pomoč kdaj koli na voljo.
In State aid proceedings the Commission has to, in the last analysis, rely on the statements of the Member State supposed to (have) grant(ed) the aid.
V postopkih za odobritev državne pomoči se mora Komisija zanašati na izjave države članice, ki bo (naj bi) odobrila pomoč.
Assessment as ad hoc aid
Ovrednotenje pomoči kot ad hoc pomoči
In the opening of the procedure the Commission also explored the possibility of approving the aid directly based on Article 3(4) of the shipbuilding Regulation, now replaced by section 3.3.4. of the Framework on State aid to shipbuilding, which states that ‘aid in the form of State supported credit facilities granted to national and non-national shipowners or third parties for the building (…) of vessels may [9] be deemed compatible with the common market and shall not be counted within the ceiling (on operating aid) if it complies with the terms of (…) OECD Understanding on export credits for ships…’, since the OECD Understanding for ships contains a matching clause.
Začetek postopka je odprl možnost odobritve pomoči, ki temelji neposredno na členu 3(4) Uredbe o ladjedelništvu, ki jo je sedaj nadomestil oddelek 3.3.4 okvira državne pomoči za ladjedelnice, ki navaja, da se „pomoč v obliki s strani države podprtih kreditnih sredstev, ki so namenjena državnim in zunanjim ladjarjem oziroma tretjim strankam, za gradnjo … plovil lahko [9] šteje za združljivo s skupnim trgom in v primeru, da ustreza pogojem … Sporazuma OECD o izvoznih kreditih za ladje …, ne bo obravnavana v okviru določene zgornje meje (operativne pomoči)“, kar je bilo mogoče, ker Sporazum OECD za ladje vsebuje enako klavzulo.
In this respect, the Commission first notes that it does not accept the matching of alleged aid from another Member State; therefore, this provision is not applicable in the present case.
V tem pogledu Komisija najprej poudarja, da zavrača dodeljevanje vsebinsko enake pomoči za domnevno pomoč druge države članice; ta predpis se zato ne uporablja v zadevnem primeru.
The Commission considers that the use of ‘may’ gives it discretion not to apply this provision for matching alleged aid from another Member State.
Komisija meni, da ji fraza „lahko“ omogoča neuporabo te določbe za dodeljevanje vsebinsko enako pomoči za domnevno pomoč druge države članice.
Secondly, the Commission recalls that no new information has been presented which would make it modify its doubts that there were sufficient proof of the alleged Spanish aid (see recital 24).
Komisija prav tako opozarja, da ni bila posredovana nobena nova informacija, ki bi ovrgla dvome o zadostnih dokazih, da je bila pomoč Španije dejansko ponujena (glej uvodno izjavo 24 zgoraj).
Thirdly, the Commission confirms, as mentioned in its decision to open the procedure, that the provision concerns credits to shipowners (or third parties) while the aid at stake relates to grants to shipyards.
Poleg tega, kot je bilo omenjeno v njeni odločitvi za začetek postopka, Komisija potrjuje, da določba zadeva odobritve kreditov ladjarjem (oziroma tretjim strankam), medtem ko se zadevna pomoč nanaša na nepovratna sredstva ladjedelnicam.
Finally, the Commission disagrees with the Netherlands that the aid should only be assessed on the basis of Council decisions based on the OECD export credit rules.
Komisija nazadnje izraža nestrinjanje z Nizozemsko, da bi morala biti pomoč ovrednotena na osnovi odločb Sveta, ki temeljijo na pravilih OECD za izvozne kredite.
State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the Treaty to the shipbuilding industry has necessarily to be assessed on the basis of the applicable rules that the Commission imposed itself (the framework on State aid to shipbuilding) in order to apply the derogations to the incompatibility of State aid as foreseen by the Treaty.
Državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe z ladjedelniško industrijo mora biti nujno ovrednotena na osnovi veljavnih pravil, ki si jih je Komisija zastavila, da bi lažje uporabljala odstopanja od neskladnosti državne pomoči, kot to predvideva Pogodba.
The Commission also considers that no other legal basis exists under which the notified State aid could be approved.
Komisija je tudi mnenja, da ne obstaja nobena druga pravna podlaga, na kateri bi se lahko odobrila priglašena državna pomoč.
Besides, the Dutch authorities have not invoked any other derogation of the Treaty.
Poleg tega se niso nizozemski organi sklicevali na nobeno drugo odstopanje Pogodbe.
Legitimate expectations of the beneficiaries
Upravičena pričakovanja upravičencev
As already mentioned, the BSE scheme was not applicable and therefore no legitimate expectations from the beneficiaries can be accepted.
Kot je bilo že omenjeno, se je shema BSE izkazala za neuporabno in zato nobena upravičena pričakovanja upravičencev ne morejo biti sprejeta.
In any case, the beneficiaries could not claim legitimate expectations since the aid was granted by the Netherlands subject to the outcome of the Commission assessment.
Ker je odobritev zadevne pomoči s strani Nizozemske pogojeno z ovrednotenjem Komisije, ne morejo upravičenci v nobenem primeru uveljavljati upravičenih pričakovanj.
The Commission concludes that the notified aid is contrary to the general principles of the EC Treaty.
Komisija sklene, da je priglašena pomoč v nasprotju s splošnimi načeli Pogodbe ES.
Furthermore, the aid scheme, to which the Netherlands authorities have referred, has expired, and even if it were still in force the aid would not be compatible with this scheme.
Poleg tega omenjena shema pomoči, na katero so se sklicevali nizozemski organi, ni več veljavna, pa tudi v nasprotnem primeru pomoč ne bi bila združljiva s to shemo.
There are no legitimate expectations to approve the aid, and there is no other possibility to approve the aid under any other legal basis.
Ne obstajajo nikakršna upravičena pričakovanja, da bi se ta pomoč odobrila, hkrati pa ni možnosti da bi se to zgodilo na kakršni koli drugi pravni osnovi.
Therefore the notified aid is incompatible with the Treaty,
Priglašena pomoč je torej nezdružljiva s Pogodbo –
The State aid which the Netherlands is planning to implement for Bodewes Scheepswerven BV, amounting to EUR […], for Scheepswerf Visser, amounting to EUR […], for Bodewes Scheepswerf Volharding Foxhol, amounting to EUR […] and for Scheepswerf De Merwede, amounting to EUR […] is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo namerava Nizozemska nameniti ladjedelnicam Bodewes Scheepswerven BV, ki znaša […] EUR, Scheepswerf Visser, ki znaša […] EUR, Bodewes Scheepswerf Volharding Foxhol, ki znaša […] EUR in Scheepswerf De Merwede, ki znaša […] EUR, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid may accordingly not be implemented.
V skladu s tem se pomoč ne sme izvajati.
The Netherlands shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Nizozemska v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih sprejme za uskladitev s to odločbo.
OJ C 11, 15.1.2004, p. 5.
UL C 11, 15.1.2004, str. 5.
Confidential information.
Zaupni podatki.
OJ C 203, 11.8.1992.
UL C 203, 11.8.1992.
OJ C 253, 12.8.1998, p. 13.
UL C 253, 12.8.1998, str. 13.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 of 29 June 1998 establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding (OJ L 202, 18.7.1998, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1540/98 z dne 29. junija 1998 o določitvi novih pravil o pomoči ladjedelništvu (UL L 202, 18.7.1998, str. 1).
See Case 78/79, Steinike 1 Weinlig v Federal Republic of Germany [1977] ECR 595, paragraph 24.
Glej: Zadeva 78/79, Steinike 1 Weinlig proti Zvezni republiki Nemčiji [1977] PSES 595, odst. 24.
Not underlined in the 1997 decision.
Ni poudarjeno v odločbi iz leta 1997.
Not underlined in the Framework.
Ni poudarjeno v okviru državne pomoči.
secondly, in its decision on the modified scheme in 1997 (N 337/97), the Commission stated, as a general observation before assessing the scheme, that ‘Although trade effects between Member State are probably felt less intensively in cases of aid to trade transactions outside the EU [8], such effects cannot a priori be excluded.’.
drugič je v odločbi o spremembi sheme iz leta 1997 (N 337/97) Komisija podala splošno opažanje pred ovrednotenjem sheme, da „ne glede na to, da so trgovinski učinki med državami članicami najverjetneje manj očitni v primerih pomoči trgovinskim transakcijam zunaj EU [8], takih učinkov a priori ni mogoče izključiti.“. To je bil tudi razlog, da je bilo treba shemo sploh ovrednotiti.
This is a clear indication that the notified scheme was assumed to involve aid to trade transactions outside the EU.
Iz tega je torej jasno razvidno, da je bilo za priglašeno shemo ocenjeno, da se je nanašala na pomoč trgovinskim transakcijam zunaj EU.
TABLE 1 Notified aid, ships and benefiting shipyards
Priglašena pomoč, ladje in upravičene ladjedelnice
of 9 February 2005
z dne 9. februarja 2005
amending Decision 2004/292/EC on the introduction of the TRACES system and amending Decision 92/486/EEC
o spremembi Odločbe 2004/292/ES o uvedbi sistema TRACES in spremembi Odločbe 92/486/EGS
(notified under document number C(2005) 279)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 279)
Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market [1], and in particular Article 20(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 90/425/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o veterinarskih in zootehničnih pregledih, ki se zaradi vzpostavitve notranjega trga [1] izvajajo v trgovini znotraj Skupnosti z nekaterimi živimi živalmi in proizvodi, in zlasti člena 20(3) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Decision 92/438/EEC of 13 July 1992 on computerisation of veterinary import procedures (Shift project), amending Directives 90/675/EEC, 91/496/EEC, 91/628/EEC and Decision 90/424/EEC, and repealing Decision 88/192/EEC [2], and in particular Article 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 92/438/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 o uvajanju računalniške tehnologije v veterinarske uvozne postopke (projekt Shift), spremembi direktiv 90/675/EGS, 91/496/EGS, 91/628/EGS in Odločbe 90/424/EGS ter o razveljavitvi Odločbe 88/192/EGS [2], in zlasti člena 12 Odločbe,
Commission Decision 2003/24/EC of 30 December 2003 concerning the development of an integrated computerised veterinary system [3] provides for the development of the TRACES computer system.
Odločba Komisije 2003/24/ES z dne 30. decembra 2003 o razvoju celovitega računalniškega veterinarskega sistema [3] določa razvoj računalniškega sistema TRACES.
Entering into the TRACES system all the information contained in the common veterinary entry documents for products, provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 136/2004 of 22 January 2004 laying down procedures for veterinary checks at Community border inspection posts on products imported from third countries [4], constitutes a huge increase in the workload of the border inspection posts.
Vnašanje vseh podatkov v sistem TRACES iz skupnih veterinarskih carinskih dokumentov za proizvode, določene v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 136/2004 z dne 22. januarja 2004 o postopkih za veterinarske preglede proizvodov, uvoženih iz tretjih držav [4], na mejnih kontrolnih točkah Skupnosti predstavlja za mejne kontrolne točke ogromno povečanje obsega dela.
Imports into the Community of products of animal origin subject to the specific procedures provided for in Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [5] must, however, be transmitted via the TRACES system.
Vendar je treba uvoze proizvodov živalskega izvora v Skupnost, ki so predmet posebnih postopkov, določenih v Direktivi Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [5] posredovati prek sistema TRACES.
Under Commission Decision 2004/292/EC of 30 March 2004 on the introduction of the TRACES system and amending Decision 92/486/EEC [6], the TRACES system is to be used by the Member States from 1 April 2004.
Po Odločbi Komisije 2004/292/ES z dne 30. marca 2004 o uvedbi sistema TRACES in spremembi Odločbe 92/486/EGS [6] morajo države članice uporabljati sistem TRACES od 1. aprila 2004.
The Member States need time to raise the awareness of freight forwarders and to train them in order to ensure that they play an active part in entering data into the TRACES system.
Države članice potrebujejo čas za osveščanje špediterjev tovora in za njihovo usposabljanje, da bi zagotovili njihovo aktivno vlogo pri vnosu podatkov v sistem TRACES.
Connections between the TRACES system and existing computerised health declaration systems in some Member States require an extensive test phase.
Povezave med sistemom TRACES in obstoječimi računalniškimi sistemi o zdravstveni deklaraciji v nekaterih državah članicah zahtevajo obsežno testno fazo.
Decision 2004/292/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Odločbo 2004/292/ES ustrezno spremeniti.
Article 3(2) of Decision 2004/292/EC is hereby replaced by the following:
Člen 3(2) Odločbe 2004/292/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Member States shall ensure that the following data are entered in TRACES from 31 December 2004:
Države članice zagotovijo, da se od 31. decembra 2004 naslednji podatki vnesejo v TRACES:
Parts I and II of health certificates relating to trade and Part III where a check is undertaken;
del I in II zdravstvenih spričeval v zvezi s trgovino in del III, kadar se izvede pregled;
common veterinary entry documents for all animals entering the Community; and
skupni veterinarski carinski dokumenti za vse živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost; in
common veterinary entry documents for all rejected consignments and for all products subject to the following specific procedures under Directive 97/78/EC:
skupni veterinarski carinski dokumenti za vse zavrnjene pošiljke in za vse proizvode, ki so predmet naslednjih posebnih postopkov po Direktivi 97/78/ES:
the specific monitoring procedure in Article 8(4),
posebni spremljevalni postopek v členu 8(4);
the procedure for the transit of consignments from one third country to another third country in Article 11(1);
postopek za tranzit pošiljk iz ene tretje države v drugo tretjo državo v členu 11(1);
the procedure for transferring consignments to a free zone, a free warehouse or a customs warehouse in Article 12(1);
postopek za prenos pošiljk v prosto cono, prosto skladišče ali carinsko skladišče v členu 12(1);
the procedure for supplying sea transport in Article 13(1); and
postopek za oskrbovanje pomorskih prevoznih sredstev v členu 13(1) in
the procedure to authorise the re-importation of products of Community origin in Article 15(1).
postopek za odobritev ponovnega uvoza proizvodov, ki izvirajo iz Skupnosti v členu 15(1).
Without prejudice to paragraph 2(c), the Member States shall ensure that all common veterinary entry documents for all products entering the Community whatever the customs arrangements to which they are subject are entered in TRACES from 30 June 2005.’
Brez poseganja v odstavek 2(c) države članice zagotovijo, da se vsi skupni veterinarski carinski dokumenti za vse proizvode, ki vstopajo v Skupnost, ne glede na carinsko dovoljeno rabo ali uporabo blaga, ki velja zanje, vnašajo v TRACES od 30. junija 2005.“
Done at Brussels, 9 February 2005.
V Bruslju, 9. februarja 2005
OJ L 8, 14.1.2003, p. 44.
UL L 8, 14.1.2003, str. 44.
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 882/2004 (UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str. 1.
Corrected in OJ L 191, 28.5.2004, p. 1).
Popravljena v UL L 191, 28.5.2004, str. 1).
of 10 February 2005
z dne 10. februarja 2005
authorising certain Member States to use information from sources other than statistical surveys for the 2005 survey on the structure of agricultural holdings
o pooblastitvi nekaterih držav članic, da za statistično raziskovanje o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev za leto 2005 uporabijo podatke iz drugih virov kot iz statističnih raziskav
(notified under document number C(2005) 284)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 284)
(Only the Danish, German, Estonian, English, Finnish, French, Dutch, Slovenian, and Swedish texts are authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem, danskem, estonskem, finskem, francoskem, nemškem, nizozemskem, slovenskem in švedskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 571/88 of 29 February 1988 on the organisation of Community surveys on the structure of agricultural holdings [1], and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 571/88 z dne 29. februarja 1988 o organizaciji statističnih raziskovanj Skupnosti o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev v obdobju 1988 in 1997 [1], in zlasti člena 8(2) Uredbe,
When determining the characteristics to be surveyed, an effort should be made to limit, as far as possible, the burden on respondents to the survey.
Pri določitvi parametrov za raziskovanje si je treba prizadevati, da se, kolikor je to mogoče, zmanjša breme za osebe, ki sodelujejo v raziskavi.
In accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 571/88, certain Member States have asked to be authorised to use, in the 2005 survey on the structure of agricultural holdings, for certain characteristics, information that is already available from sources other than statistical surveys.
V skladu s členom 8(2) Uredbe (EGS) št. 571/88 so nekatere države članice zaprosile za pooblastilo, da pri statističnem raziskovanju o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev za leto 2005 za nekatere parametre uporabijo podatke, ki so že na voljo iz drugih virov kot iz statističnih raziskav.
The results of the Farm Structure Surveys are of great importance to the common agricultural policy.
Rezultati raziskav o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev so velikega pomena za skupno kmetijsko politiko.
It is necessary to maintain a high quality of information, and therefore the use of data from sources other than statistical surveys can only be accepted if these data are as reliable as those from statistical surveys.
Ker je treba ohranjati visoko kakovost podatkov, je uporaba podatkov iz drugih virov kot iz statističnih raziskav, sprejemljiva le, če so ti podatki tako zanesljivi kot tisti iz statističnih raziskav.
The Member States having asked to be authorised to use data from sources other than statistical surveys have provided the Commission with technical documentation as to the relevance and the accuracy of these sources.
Države članice, ki so zaprosile za pooblastilo, da uporabijo podatke iz drugih virov kot iz statističnih raziskav, so Komisiji predložile tehnično dokumentacijo glede ustreznosti in točnosti teh virov.
Following examination of this technical documentation, the authorisations requested by the Member States should be granted.
Po pregledu te tehnične dokumentacije se pooblastila, za katera so zaprosile države članice, odobrijo.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics established by Council Decision 72/279/EEC [2],
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za kmetijsko statistiko, ki je bil ustanovljen s Sklepom Sveta 72/279/EGS [2] –
The Member States listed in the Annex are authorised to use information already available from sources other than statistical surveys in the Farm Structure Survey 2005 for certain characteristics.
Države članice, navedene v Prilogi, so pooblaščene, da za nekatere parametre v Raziskavi o strukturi kmetijskih gospodarstev za leto 2005 uporabijo podatke, ki so že na voljo iz drugih virov kot iz statističnih raziskav.
Those sources shall be as set out in the Annex.
Navedeni viri so določeni v Prilogi.
The Member States concerned shall take the necessary measures to ensure that this information is of at least equal quality to information obtained from statistical surveys.
Zadevne države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe, da zagotovijo, da so ti podatki vsaj enake kakovosti kot podatki, pridobljeni v statističnih raziskavah.
They shall provide a report assessing the quality of these information sources.
Zagotoviti morajo poročilo o oceni kakovosti teh virov podatkov.