natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case at hand, the State granted not only annual compensation payments to RTP but also additional financing in the form of share capital increases, loans and an agreement with the social security scheme.
V zadevnem primeru je država RTP jamčila ne samo za letna kompenzacijska plačila, temveč tudi za dodatno financiranje v obliki povečanja kapitala, posojil in pogodbe s shemo socialne varnosti.
Although the public service contracts provided for state compensation in the form of annual compensation payments for operating costs and the possibility of capital increases for investments made by RTP, the legal provisions relating to RTP's public service did not provide for any financing by means of loans and social security deductions.
Čeprav so pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe določile državno kompenzacijo v obliki letnih kompenzacijskih plačil za stroške poslovanja in možnosti dokapitalizacij RTP, pravna določila v zvezi z javno službo RTP niso določala nobenega financiranja s posojili in odbitki socialne varnosti.
However, in line with paragraph 57 of the communication on broadcasting, the Commission has to analyse whether all measures are proportionate to the net public service costs.
Vendar mora Komisija v skladu z odstavkom 57 sporočila o radioteleviziji analizirati, če so vsi ukrepi proporcionalni neto stroškom javne službe.
Only then can the financing of RTP be considered to be compatible with Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty.
Samo tako se lahko upošteva financiranje RTP, kot skladno s členom 86(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission also considers that the public service obligations imposed on RTP which were not eligible for compensation under the public service contracts can, in fact, be considered as legitimate and clearly defined public service obligations formally imposed by the State on the service provider.
Komisija tudi meni, da se lahko RTP naložene obveznosti javne službe, ki niso bile primerne za kompenzacijo na podlagi pogodb za izvajanje javne službe dejansko smatrajo za zakonite in jasno določene obveznosti javne službe, ki jih je država uradno naložila ponudniku storitev.
Therefore, under Community law, the Portuguese State may finance all the net public service costs of RTP.
Iz tega razloga lahko portugalska država v skladu s pravom Skupnosti financira vse neto stroške javne službe RTP.
For the purposes of the present decision, it is not necessary to recalculate exactly all the real net costs incurred by RTP in performing its public service obligations.
Zaradi sedanje odločitve ni potrebno ponovno natančno izračunati vseh realnih neto stroškov, ki so nastali RTP pri opravljanju njegovih obveznosti javne službe.
It is sufficient to demonstrate that the total state financing received by RTP in the period 1992 to 1998 did not exceed the net extra costs incurred by the undertaking in fulfilling over the same period the public service tasks referred to.
Dovolj je prikazati skupno državno financiranje, ki ga je RTP prejel v obdobju 1992-1998, ki ni preseglo neto izrednih stroškov, ki so v istem obdobju nastali podjetju pri izpolnjevanju nalog javne službe.
Table 6 gives an overview of RTP's public service costs (both investment costs and net operating costs), as calculated under the cost accounting rules applicable, and of the compensation received for investment and operating costs.
Tabela 6 prikazuje pregled RTP stroškov javne službe (tako stroške vlaganj, kot tudi neto stroške poslovanja), izračunanih v skladu z uporabnimi stroškovno računovodskimi pravili in kompenzacijo, ki jo je prejel za vlaganja in stroške poslovanja.
Firstly, the investments in public service equipment (Table 5) and compensation provided for to finance investments (Table 2) are presented.
Prvič se prikazujejo vlaganja v opremo javne službe (Tabela 5) in zagotovljena kompenzacija za finančna vlaganja (Tabela 2).
Secondly, the net operating costs of RTP (Table 4) and the compensation payments for these costs (Table 1) are presented.
Drugič se prikazujejo neto stroški poslovanja RTP (Tabela 4) in kompenzacijska plačila teh stroškov (Tabela 1).
Lastly, the table shows the advantage gained from ad hoc aid resulting from the agreement with the social security scheme and the loan.
Nazadnje tabela prikazuje pridobljeno korist iz začasne pomoči, ki izhaja iz pogodbe s shemo socialne varnosti in posojila.
Summary of funding needs and compensation for the public service net operating cost under the accounting rules
Povzetek potreb denarne podpore in kompenzacije neto stroškov poslovanja javne službe v skladu z računovodskimi pravili
Source: Financial report and public service reports.
Viri: Finančno poročilo in poročila javne službe.
Sum
Znesek
Investment costs
Stroški vlaganja
Capital injections
Dokapitalizacije
Difference between investment costs and compensation
Razlika med stroški vlaganja in kompenzacijo
Public service operating costs
Stroški poslovanja javne službe
Compensation payments
Kompenzacijska plačila
Loan
Posojilo
Difference between operating costs and compensation
Razlika med stroški poslovanja in kompenzacijo
At a second stage, in order to maintain the financial equilibrium of RTP, the authorities used ad hoc instruments to finance RTP's public service costs.
Na drugi stopnji so organi oblasti uporabili začasna sredstva za financiranje RTP stroškov javne službe, da so ohranili finančno ravnotežje RTP.
As Table 6 shows, the capital injection overcompensated for public service investments by PTE 26736,8 million, whereas the operating costs were underfinanced by the compensation payments and the other ad hoc aid to the tune of PTE 28755,1 million.
Kot Tabela 6 prikazuje so dokapitalizacije prekomerno kompenzirale vlaganja javne službe za 26,7368 milijard PTE, pri čemer so bili stroški poslovanja premalo financirani s kompenzacijskimi plačili in drugo začasno pomočjo v znesku od 28,7551 milijard PTE.
Indeed, although the capital injections were basically meant to finance investments in equipment, they were also used to repay accumulated debt.
V resnici so bile dokapitalizacije uporabljene za odplačilo nakopičenega dolga, čeprav so bile dejansko namenjene financiranju vlaganj v opremo.
As Table 6 also shows, the total compensation was PTE 2018,3 million less than the net public service costs (PTE 28755,1 minus PTE 26736,8 million).
Kot Tabela 6 prikazuje je bila skupna kompenzacija za 2,0183 milijard manjša od neto stroškov javne službe (28,7551 PTE minus 26,7368 milijard PTE).
The Commission concludes, therefore, that under the Community rules total state funding is proportionate to the net operating public service costs of RTP for the period under investigation.
Komisija iz tega razloga ugotavlja, da je v skladu s pravili Skupnosti za obdobje pod preiskavo skupna državna denarna podpora proporcionalna neto stroškom poslovanja javne službe RTP.
The Commission considers that the funds received were probably even lower than the total net costs incurred in fulfilling the obligations imposed on it by the State owing to the fact the table above does not take into account all the public service costs of RTP in the period 1992 to 1998.
Komisija upošteva, da so bila prejeta denarna sredstva verjetno celo nižja od skupnih neto stroškov, nastalih pri izpolnjevanju naloženih obveznosti države, glede na dejstvo, da zgornja tabela ne upošteva vseh stroškov javne službe RTP v obdobju 1992-1998.
According to the communication on broadcasting, the Commission should ensure that the state funding is proportionate to the net costs of providing the public service but also that no market distortions occur with respect to the commercial activities which derive from the public service activities and for which no correct cost allocation is possible on the revenue side that are not necessary for the fulfilment of the public service mission.
Komisija bi morala z oziroma na sporočilo o radioteleviziji zagotoviti, da je državna denarna podpora proporcionalna neto stroškom zagotavljanja javne službe in da niso nastala nobena izkrivljenja na trgu, upoštevajoč gospodarske dejavnosti, ki izvirajo iz dejavnosti javnih služb in za katere na strani dohodkov ni mogoča pravilna razporeditev stroškov, nepotrebnih za izpolnjevanje poslanstva javne službe.
There would be such a distortion if RTP depressed the prices of advertising on the market so as to reduce the revenue of competitors [88].
Do takšnega izkrivljenja bi prišlo, če bi RTP znižal cene reklamiranja na trgu, da bi na ta način znižal dohodek konkurentov [88].
In such a case, RTP would not maximise its commercial revenues and would unnecessarily increase the need for state funding.
V takšnem primeru RTP ne bi maksimiral svojih gospodarskih dohodkov in bi po nepotrebnem zvišal potrebo po denarni podpori.
According to the communication, such conduct, if demonstrated, cannot be considered as intrinsic to the public service mission attributed to the broadcaster [89].
V skladu s sporočilom se takšno ravnanje, če bi nastopilo, ne bi moglo obravnavati, kot bistveno za poslanstvo javne službe, ki bi prispevalo izdajatelju televizijskega programa [89].
In the decision initiating the investigation procedure the Commission stated that, if such conduct were found to have taken place, it would take these distortions and the resulting need for higher state funding into account when assessing possible overcompensation.
V odločitvi za uvedbo preiskovalnega postopka je Komisija navedla, da v kolikor bi se ugotovil obstoj takšnega ravnanja, bi privedel do upoštevanja teh izkrivljenj in posledičnih potreb po višji državni denarni podpori pri ocenjevanju morebitne prekomerne kompenzacije.
At that stage in the procedure, the Commission noted that ‘on the basis of the information the Commission has in its possession at this moment, it cannot be established whether RTP engaged in such behaviour’ [90].
Na tej točki postopka je Komisija opozorila, da „na osnovi informacij, ki jih ima Komisija v tem trenutku ni mogoče ugotoviti, če je RTP sodeloval pri takšnem ravnanju“ [90].
Following the invitation to submit comments on the initiation of procedure, the Commission did not receive any observations from RTP's competitors indicating or demonstrating that RTP was engaged in anti-competitive behaviour in commercial markets that could lead to increased state funding incompatible with the Treaty [91].
Komisija po vabilu za predložitev pripomb o uvedbi postopka ni prejela nobenih pripomb konkurentov RTP, ki bi namigovale ali prikazovale, da je RTP sodeloval pri protikonkurenčnem ravnanju na gospodarskih trgih, ki bi lahko vodilo do povečane državne denarne podpore, neskladne s Pogodbo [91].
Under the circumstances, the Commission considers that there are no indications suggesting such behaviour.
Na podlagi okoliščin Komisija meni, da ni nobenih indikacij, ki bi nakazovale na takšno ravnanje.
Consequently, it concludes that RTP does not seem to have engaged in anti-competitive behaviour in commercial markets leading to an increased need for state funding and that no overcompensation took place as a result of such behaviour.
Posledično ugotavlja, da je videti, da RTP na gospodarskih trgih ni ravnal protikonkurenčno, kar bi vodilo do povečane potrebe po državni denarni podpori in da ni prišlo do nobene prekomerne kompenzacije v posledici takšnega ravnanja.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that the agreement with the social security scheme, the capital injections and the subordinated loan have to be regarded as state aid under Article 87(1).
Glede na to Komisija zaključuje, da se morajo pogodba s shemo socialne varnosti, dokapitalizacije in hibridni instrument obravnavati kot državna pomoč v skladu s členom 87(1).
However, the funding of RTP by means of ad hoc aid is compatible with the common market under Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty.
Vendar je denarna podpora RTP s sredstvi začasne pomoči skladna s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 86(2) Pogodbe ES.
The total funding is proportionate to the net costs of clearly defined, entrusted public service obligations.
Skupna denarna podpora je proporcionalna neto stroškom jasno določene, naložene obveznosti javne službe.
Therefore, the state funding did not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest under Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty [92].
Iz tega razloga državna denarna podpora ni vplivala na trgovinske pogoje in konkurenco Skupnosti v meri, ki bi bila v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi v skladu s členom 86(2) Pogodbe ES [92].
The Commission finds that Portugal has unlawfully implemented the ad hoc aid in question in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Portugalska glede na kršitev člena 88(3) Pogodbe nezakonito izvajala zadevno začasno pomoč.
On the basis of the above analysis, it concludes that the agreement with the social security scheme in 1993, the capital injections in the period 1994 to 1997 and the loan in 1998 constitute state aid under Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Na osnovi zgornje analize ugotavlja, da pogodba s shemo socialne varnosti v letu 1993, dokapitalizacije v obdobju 1994-1997 in posojilo v letu 1998 predstavljajo državno pomoč v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe.
The measures are granted through state resources, threaten to distort competition by favouring RTP and have an effect on trade.
Ukrepi so odobreni z državnimi sredstvi in predstavljajo nevarnost izkrivljenja konkurence z dajanjem prednosti RTP in imajo vpliv na trgovino.
As analysed above, the measures do not fulfil the conditions set out in Altmark as they cannot be regarded as forming part of a compensation system whose parameters have been established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner.
Kot je zgoraj analizirano, ukrepi ne izpolnjujejo pogojev, določenih v Altmark, zaradi česar se ne morejo upoštevati kot sestavni del kompenzacijskega sistema, katerega parametri so bili predhodno določeni na objektiven in pregleden način.
Furthermore, it is clear that RTP was not chosen by means of a public procurement procedure guaranteeing the lowest possible cost and there are no indications that the amount of the ad hoc payments was determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs that a typical undertaking would have incurred.
Poleg tega je jasno, da RTP ni bila izbrana po postopku javnih naročil, z jamstvom najnižje možne cene in ne obstajajo nobene indikacije, da se je znesek začasnih plačil določil na osnovi analize stroškov, ki bi nastali tipičnemu podjetju.
The exemption provided for in Article 86(2) is applicable to the ad hoc measures.
Oprostitev, določena v členu 86(2) se uporablja za začasne ukrepe.
As analysed above, the measures compensated for clearly defined public service obligations duly entrusted to RTP.
Kot je zgoraj analizirano so ukrepi kompenzirali jasno določene obveznosti javne službe, ustrezno naložene RTP.
As stated earlier, the ad hoc measures are proportionate to the net public service costs of RTP.
Kot je bilo na začetku navedeno so začasni ukrepi sorazmerni neto stroškom javne službe RTP.
The measures do not distort competition to an extent contrary to the Community interest since they are proportionate to the net public service cost of RTP and since RTP did not behave in an anti-competitive manner in its commercial activities,
Ukrepi ne izkrivljajo konkurence v meri, ki bila v nasprotju z interesi Skupnosti, ker so sorazmerni neto stroškom javne službe RTP in ker se RTP v svojih gospodarskih dejavnostih ni obnašala na protikonkurenčni način –
The state aid of PTE 68006 million granted by Portugal to RTP in the form of an agreement with the social security scheme in 1993, capital injections in the period 1994 to 1997 and a loan in 1998 is compatible with the common market within the meaning of Article 86(2) of the Treaty since it did not lead to any overcompensation of the net costs of the public service tasks entrusted to RTP.
Državna pomoč v znesku 68,006 milijard PTE, ki jo je Portugalska odobrila RTP v obliki pogodbe s shemo socialne varnosti v letu 1993, dokapitalizacij v obdobju 1994-1997 in posojila v letu 1998 je v smislu člena 86(2) Pogodbe združljiva s skupnim trgom, ker ni vodila do kakršne koli prekomerne kompenzacije neto stroškov RTP naloženih nalog javne službe.
The following measures do not constitute state aid: the exemption from registration charges, the payment for the hiving-off of the television broadcasting network, the facilities granted for payment of the annual fee for use of the television broadcasting network, the protocol on cinema promotion, the bond issue and the restructuring plan for the period 1996 to 2000.
Naslednji ukrepi ne predstavljajo državne pomoči: oprostitev registracijskih taks, plačilo za odcepitev radiofuzijskega omrežja, odobrena sredstva za plačila letnih pristojbin za uporabo radiofuzijskega omrežja, protokol o promociji kinematografov, izdaja obveznic in načrt prestrukturiranja za obdobje 1996-2000.
This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Portugalsko.
OJ C 85, 9.4.2002, p. 9.
UL C 85, 9.4.2002, str. 9.
Council Regulation (EC), No 659/99 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999, ki določa podrobna pravila za uporabo člena 93 [sedaj člen 88] Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str. 1).
Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003.
According to Article 5, ‘Performance of the public service obligations entrusted to RTP SA […] shall confer on that company the right to a compensation payment the exact amount of which will correspond to the actual cost of providing the public service, which shall be determined on the basis of objectively quantifiable criteria and in accordance with the principle of sound management.’
V skladu s členom 5: „Obveznosti iz opravljanja javnih storitev, ki so bila poverjena RTP SA […] bodo dala tej družbi pravico do kompenzacijskega plačila, katerega točno določen znesek, ki bo ustrezal dejanskim stroškom zagotavljanja javne službe in ki bo določen na osnovi objektivno merljivih kriterijev ter v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja.“
Article 3(2) and (3) of Law No 84/88 of 20 July 1988.
Člen 3(2) in (3) Zakona št. 84/88 z dne 20. julija 1988.
Decree-Law No 404/90 of 21 December 1990.
Uredba z zakonsko močjo št. 404/90 z dne 21. decembra 1990.
Decree-Law No 138/91 of 8 April 1991.
Uredba z zakonsko močjo št. 138/91 z dne 8. aprila 1991.
For an analysis of the value of the network, see the Commission Decision of November 1996 in which the Commission decided that the value of the network was in line with the market value.
Za analizo vrednosti omrežja glej odločbo Komisije novembra 1996, s katero je Komisija odločila, da je vrednost omrežja v skladu s tržno vrednostjo.
In 1991 RTP hived off its assets to TDP and participated in TDP to the value of the assets.
V letu 1991 je RTP odcepil svoje premoženje TDP in bil udeležen v vrednosti premoženja TDP.
Afterwards the State became the sole direct owner of TDP.
Potem je država postala edini neposredni lastnik TDP.
However, it appears that the State did not pay RTP in cash but became a debtor of RTP for the amount of PTE 5400 million.
Vendar je videti, da država ni plačala RTP z denarjem, temveč je v znesku 5,4 milijard PTE postala dolžnica RTP.
Eventually, RTP adjusted its claims against retained losses.
Sčasoma je RTP poravnal svoje terjatve do zadržanih izgub.
Additionally, in view of the fact that RTP had effectively lost certain assets, the State decided in 1993 to provide resources to RTP by injecting capital equivalent to the assets given up by RTP.
Poleg tega in z ozirom na dejstvo, da je RTP dejansko izgubil določeno premoženje se je država v letu 1993 odločila preskrbeti denarna sredstva RTP z dokapitalizacijo, enakovredno premoženju katerega se je RTP odrekel.
The main shareholders are the Banco Espírito Santo group (9,3 %), Brandes Investments Partners (5,5 %), Telefonica (4,8 %), the Caixa Geral de Depositos group (4,7 %) and the BPI group (2,9 %).
Glavni delničarji so Banco Espírito Santo group (9,3 %), Brandes Investments Partners (5,5 %), Telefonica (4,8 %), Caixa Geral de Depositos group (4,7 %) in BPI group (2,9 %).
Article 13(1)(f) of Law No 58/90 of 7 September 1990, which governs the activity of television broadcasting.
Člen 13(1)(f) Zakona št. 58/90 z dne 7. septembra 1990, ki ureja oddajanje radiotelevizije.
Article 5 of Decree-Law No 401/90 of 20 December 1990, replaced by Article 13 of Decree-Law No 40/95 of 15 February 1995.
Člen 5 Uredbe z zakonsko močjo št. 401/90 z dne 20. decembra 1990, ki ga je nadomestil člen 13 Uredbe z zakonsko močjo št. 40/95 z dne 15. februarja 1995.
Article 4(2) of Decree-Law No 401/90 of 20 December 1990.
Člen 4(2) Uredbe z zakonsko močjo št. 401/90.
PTE 3650 million in 1992, PTE 3680 million in 1993, PTE 3101 million in 1994, PTE 2866 million in 1995 and PTE 5400 million in 1996.
3,65 milijard PTE v letu 1992, 3,68 milijard PTE v letu 1993, 3,101 milijard PTE v letu 1994, 2, 866 milijard PTE v letu 1995 in 2,876 milijonov PTE v letu 1996.
In March 1996 and December 1997.
V marcu 1996 in decembru 1997.
Decree-Law No 40/95 of 15 February 1995, as amended by Decree-Law No 458/99 of 5 December 1999.
Uredba z zakonsko močjo št. 40/95, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo z zakonsko močjo št. 458/99 z dne 5. decembra 1999.
Clause 14 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 21 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 14 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzula 21 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Law No 7/98.
Zakon št. 7/98.
Article 1 of Decree-Law No 160/96.
Člen 1 Uredbe z zakonsko močjo št. 160/96.
A rate of 3,54 % was applied in 1999, 4,14 % in 2000, 5,05 % in 2001, 3,62 % in 2002 and 2,95 % in 2003.
Tečaj 3,54 % se je uporabljal v letu 1999, 4,14 % v letu 2000, 5,05 % v letu 2001, 3,62 % v letu 2002 in 2.95 % v letu 2003.
Article 5 of the amended loan contract.
Člen 5 dopolnjene posojilne pogodbe.
Decree-Law No 40341 of 18 October 1955, in which the Portuguese Government undertook to promote ‘the establishment of a public limited company […] with which it will conclude a concession contract for public service television broadcasting on Portuguese territory’.
Zakon št. 40 341 z dne 18. oktobra 1955, s katerim se je portugalska vlada lotila promovirati „ustanovitev javne delniške družbe […], s katero bo sklenila pogodbo o koncesiji za javno službo radiotelevizije na portugalskem območju“.
Points 11.4 and 11.5 of Council of Ministers Resolution No 49/90 of 31 December 1990 and point 3 of Council of Ministers Resolution No 6/92 of 22 February 1992.
Točke 11.4 in 11.5 sklepa Sveta ministrov št. 49/90 z dne 31. decembra 1990 in točka 3 sklepa Sveta ministrov št. 6/92 z dne 22. februarja 1992.
Law No 21/92 of 14 August 1992.
Zakon št. 21/92 z dne 14. avgusta 1992.
The Annex to Law No 21/92 on the Statutes of RTP states in Article 3(2) and (3) that RTP may perform the following activities: (i) television advertising; (ii) marketing of products (notably programmes and publications related to its activities; (iii) provision of technical consultancy and vocational training, and cooperation with other national and foreign entities; (iv) marketing and rental of television equipment, films, magnetic tapes, videocassettes and similar products; (v) participation in additional company groups and European economic interest groups as well as in the capital of other companies, in whatever form provided for under commercial legislation.
Priloga k Zakonu št. 21/92 glede statuta RTP v členu 3(2) in (3) določa, da lahko RTP izvaja naslednje dejavnosti: (i) televizijsko reklamiranje; (ii) trženje izdelkov (predvsem programi in objave v povezavi z njihovimi dejavnostmi; (iii) priprava tehničnega svetovanja in poklicnega usposabljanja in sodelovanje z drugimi nacionalnimi in tujimi družbami; (iv) trženje in najem televizijske opreme, film, magnetofonski traki, videokasete in podobni izdelki; (v) udeležba v dodatnih družbenih skupinah in evropskih gospodarskih interesnih skupinah, kot tudi v kapitalu drugih družb, v kateri koli obliki, ki jo omogoča gospodarska zakonodaja.