natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Decisions given by the Court of First Instance under this paragraph may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Community law being affected.
Sodišče lahko izjemoma preverja odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje, sprejete po tem odstavku, pod pogoji in v mejah, določenih v statutu, če obstaja resno tveganje, da bosta prizadeti enotnost ali doslednost prava Skupnosti.
The Court of First Instance shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling under Article 234, in specific areas laid down by the Statute.
Sodišče prve stopnje je pristojno za obravnavanje in odločanje o vprašanjih, predloženih v predhodno odločanje v skladu s členom 234, na posebnih področjih, določenih s statutom.
Where the Court of First Instance considers that the case requires a decision of principle likely to affect the unity or consistency of Community law, it may refer the case to the Court of Justice for a ruling.
Če Sodišče prve stopnje meni, da je glede neke zadeve potrebna načelna odločitev, ki bi lahko prizadela enotnost ali doslednost prava Skupnosti, lahko zadevo preda v odločanje Sodišču.
Decisions given by the Court of First Instance on questions referred for a preliminary ruling may exceptionally be subject to review by the Court of Justice, under the conditions and within the limits laid down by the Statute, where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Community law being affected.’
Sodišče lahko izjemoma preverja odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje glede vprašanj, predloženih v predhodno odločanje, pod pogoji in v mejah, določenih v statutu, če obstaja resno tveganje, da bosta prizadeti enotnost ali doslednost prava Skupnosti.“
Article 140a(2) and (3) of the EAEC Treaty was similarly amended by Article 3(13) of the Treaty of Nice.
Člen 140a(2) in (3) Pogodbe ESAE je bil podobno spremenjen s točko 13 člena 3 Pogodbe iz Nice.
Account was taken in part of those amendments in Article 62 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, in accordance with which: ‘In the cases provided for in Article 225(2) and (3) of the EC Treaty and Article 140a(2) and (3) of the EAEC Treaty, where the First Advocate General considers that there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Community law being affected, he may propose that the Court of Justice review the decision of the Court of First Instance.
Delno so bile upoštevane spremembe člena 62 Protokola o Statutu Sodišča, ki določajo: „Če v primerih iz člena 225(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES in člena 140a(2) in (3) Pogodbe ESAE prvi generalni pravobranilec meni, da obstaja resno tveganje za enotnost ali doslednost prava Skupnosti, lahko predlaga, da Sodišče preuči odločitev Sodišča prve stopnje.
The proposal must be made within one month of delivery of the decision of the Court of First Instance.
Predlog mora biti dan v enem mesecu po izdaji odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje.
Within one month of receiving the proposal made by the First Advocate General, the Court of Justice shall decide whether or not the decision should be reviewed.’
V enem mesecu po prejemu predloga prvega generalnega pravobranilca Sodišče sklene, ali je treba odločitev ponovno preučiti ali ne.“
In accordance with Declaration No 13 annexed to the Final Act of the Treaty of Nice, it is necessary to adopt the provisions concerning review of judgments delivered by the Court of First Instance ruling on decisions of the judicial panels and on questions referred for a preliminary ruling, specifying:
V skladu z izjavo št. 13, priloženo Sklepni listini Pogodbe iz Nice, je treba sprejeti določbe o reviziji sodb Sodišča, ki odloča o odločitvah sodnih oddelkov in o vprašanjih, predloženih v predhodno odločanje, ter opredeliti:
the role of the parties in proceedings before the Court of Justice, in order to safeguard their rights,
vlogo strank v postopku pred Sodiščem zaradi zaščite njihovih pravic,
the effect of the review procedure on the enforceability of the decision of the Court of First Instance,
učinek revizijskega postopka na izvršljivost odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje,
the effect of the Court of Justice decision on the dispute between the parties.’,
učinek odločitve Sodišča na spor med strankami.“ –
The following Articles shall be inserted between Articles 62 and 63 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice:
Med člena 62 in 63 Protokola o Statutu Sodišča se vstavijo naslednji členi:
‘Article 62a
„Člen 62a
The Court of Justice shall give a ruling on the questions which are subject to review by means of an urgent procedure on the basis of the file forwarded to it by the Court of First Instance.
Sodišče odloča o vprašanjih, ki so predmet revizije, po hitrem postopku na podlagi spisa, ki mu ga posreduje Sodišče prve stopnje.
Those referred to in Article 23 of this Statute and, in the cases provided for in Article 225(2) of the EC Treaty and in Article 140a(2) of the EAEC Treaty, the parties to the proceedings before the Court of First Instance shall be entitled to lodge statements or written observations with the Court of Justice relating to questions which are subject to review within a period prescribed for that purpose.
Udeleženci iz člena 23 tega statuta in v primerih iz člena 225(2) Pogodbe ES in člena 140a(2) Pogodbe ESAE tudi stranke v postopku pred Sodiščem prve stopnje, imajo pravico Sodišču predložiti navedbe ali pisne izjave o vprašanjih, ki so predmet revizije, v za ta namen predvidenem roku.
The Court of Justice may decide to open the oral procedure before giving a ruling.
Sodišče lahko sklene, da pred sprejemom odločitve uvede ustni postopek.
Article 62b
Člen 62b
In the cases provided for in Article 225(2) of the EC Treaty and in Article 140a(2) of the EAEC Treaty, without prejudice to Articles 242 and 243 of the EC Treaty, proposals for review and decisions to open the review procedure shall not have suspensory effect.
V primerih iz člena 225(2) in (3) Pogodbe ES in člena 140a(2) Pogodbe ESAE, brez poseganja v člena 242 in 243 Pogodbe ES, predlog za revizijo in odločitev o uvedbi revizijskega postopka nimata odložilnega učinka.
If the Court of Justice finds that the decision of the Court of First Instance affects the unity or consistency of Community law, it shall refer the case back to the Court of First Instance which shall be bound by the points of law decided by the Court of Justice; the Court of Justice may state which of the effects of the decision of the Court of First Instance are to be considered as definitive in respect of the parties to the litigation.
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da odločitev Sodišča prve stopnje škoduje enotnosti ali doslednosti prava Skupnosti, zadevo vrne v odločanje Sodišču prve stopnje, ki je glede pravnih vprašanj vezano na odločitev Sodišča; Sodišče lahko navede katere učinke odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje, je treba šteti za dokončne za stranke v sporu.
If, however, having regard to the result of the review, the outcome of the proceedings flows from the findings of fact on which the decision of the Court of First Instance was based, the Court of Justice shall give final judgment.
Vendar Sodišče odloča dokončno, če, ob upoštevanju ugotovitev revizije, rešitev spora izhaja iz ugotovljenega dejanskega stanja, na katerem je Sodišče prve stopnje utemeljilo svojo odločitev.
In the cases provided for in Article 225(3) of the EC Treaty and Article 140a(3) of the EAEC Treaty, in the absence of proposals for review or decisions to open the review procedure, the answer(s) given by the Court of First Instance to the questions submitted to it shall take effect upon expiry of the periods prescribed for that purpose in the second paragraph of Article 62.
Če v primerih iz člena 225(3) Pogodbe ES in člena 140a(3) Pogodbe ESAE ni predlogov za revizijo ali odločitve o uvedbi revizijskega postopka, začne odgovor ali več odgovorov Sodišča prve stopnje na predložena vprašanja učinkovati po izteku rokov, določenih v ta namen v drugem pododstavku člena 62.
Should a review procedure be opened, the answer(s) subject to review shall take effect following that procedure, unless the Court of Justice decides otherwise.
V primeru uvedbe revizijskega postopka začne odgovor ali več odgovorov, ki so predmet revizije, učinkovati, če sodišče ne odloči drugače, po koncu tega postopka.
If the Court of Justice finds that the decision of the Court of First Instance affects the unity or consistency of Community law, the answer given by the Court of Justice to the questions subject to review shall be substituted for that given by the Court of First Instance.’
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da odločitev Sodišča prve stopnje škoduje enotnosti ali doslednosti prava Skupnosti, odgovor Sodišča na vprašanja, ki so predmet revizije, nadomesti odgovor Sodišča prve stopnje.“
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2005/696/EC, Euratom of 3 October 2005 amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, in order to lay down the conditions and limits for the review by the Court of Justice of decisions given by the Court of First Instance
Popravek Sklepa Sveta 2005/696/ES, Euratom, z dne 3. oktobra 2005 o spremembi Protokola o Statutu Sodišča glede določitve pogojev in omejitev revizije sodb Sodišča prve stopnje s strani Sodišča
(Official Journal of the European Union L 266 of 11 October 2005)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 266 z dne 11. oktobra 2005) Stran 60, naslov Besedilo: „Sklep Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2005 o spremembi Protokola o Statuta Sodišča glede določitve pogojev …“ se glasi: „Sklep Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2005 o spremembi Protokola o Statutu Sodišča glede določitve pogojev …“
Page 61, introductory words to Article 1
Stran 61, uvodno besedilo člena 1
For:
Besedilo:
‘The following Articles shall be inserted between Articles 62 and 63 of the Protocol of the Statute of the Court of Justice:’;
„Med člena 62 in 63 Protokola o Statutu Sodišča se vstavijo naslednji členi:“
‘The existing Article 62a of the Protocol of the Statute of the Court of Justice shall become Article 62c and the following Articles shall be inserted:’.
„Sedanji člen 62a Protokola o Statutu Sodišča postane člen 62c in vstavijo se naslednji členi:“
of 12 September 2005
z dne 12. septembra 2005
amending Decision 2000/745/EC accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India
o spremembi Sklepa 2000/745/ES o sprejetju ponujenih zavez v zvezi s protidampinškimi in protisubvencijskim postopkom pri uvoza določenega polietilentereftalata (PET) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic AD Regulation), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna protidampinška uredba“), in zlasti člena 8 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the basic AS Regulation), and in particular Articles 13 and 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [2] („osnovna protisubvencijska uredba“), in zlasti členov 13 in 15 Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 [3], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports into the Community of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2604/2000 [3] je Svet uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz polietilentereftalata („PET“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije.
Imports of PET exported by companies from which an undertaking had been accepted were exempt from that duty pursuant to Article 2(1) of that Regulation.
Uvoz PET, ki so ga izvozile družbe, katerih zaveza je bila sprejeta, je bil oproščen plačila dajatev v skladu s členom 2(1) navedene uredbe.
By Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 [4], the Council imposed definitive countervailing duties on imports into the Community of certain polyethylene terephthalate (PET) originating, inter alia, in India.
Z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2603/2000 [4] je Svet uvedel dokončne izravnalne dajatve na uvoz nekaterih polietilentereftalatov („PET“) s poreklom, med drugim, iz Indije v Skupnost.
On 29 November 2000, the Commission adopted Decision 2000/745/EC [5], accepting undertakings offered in connection with the two abovementioned proceedings by the exporters mentioned in Article 1 of that Decision.
Komisija je 29. novembra 2000 sprejela Sklep 2000/745/ES [5], s katerim je sprejela zaveze v zvezi z zgoraj navedenimi postopki s strani izvoznikov, navedenih v členu 1 navedenega sklepa.
On 12 January 2005, the Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 33/2005 [6] announced the initiation of a ‘new exporter review’ pursuant to Article 11(4) of the basic AD Regulation.
Komisija je 12. januarja 2005 z Uredbo (ES) št. 33/2005 [6] objavila začetek „pregleda za novega izvoznika“ v skladu s členom 11(4) osnovne protidampinške uredbe.
At the same time and on the same grounds, the Commission initiated an accelerated review of Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000 [7] pursuant to Article 20 of the basic AS Regulation.
Sočasno in iz istih razlogov je Komisija začela pospešeno revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 2603/2000 [7] v skladu s členom 20 osnovne protidampinške uredbe.
The definitive findings and conclusions of the investigations are set out in Council Regulation (EC) No 1646/2005 [8], amending Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000 and in Council Regulation (EC) No 1645/2005 [9] amending Regulation (EC) No 2603/2000.
Končne ugotovitve in sklepi teh preiskav so navedeni v Uredbi Sveta (ES) st. 1646/2005 [8] o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2604/2000, in v Uredbi Sveta (ES) st. 1645/2005 [9] o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2603/2000.
Subsequent to the disclosure by which South Asian Petrochem Limited (the company) was informed of the facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to impose the amended definitive anti-dumping duty and countervailing duty on its imports into the Community, the company offered a price undertaking in accordance with Article 8(1) of the basic AD Regulation and Article 13(1) of the basic AS Regulation.
Po razkritju, s katerim je bila South Asian Petrochem Limited („družba“) obveščena o dejstvih in premisleki, na podlagi katerih se je nameravalo uvesti spremenjeno dokončno protidampinško dajatev in izravnalno dajatev na njen uvoz v Skupnost, je zadevna družba ponudila cenovno zavezo v skladu s členom 8(1) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in člena 13(1) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe.
In that undertaking, the exporting producer has offered to sell the product concerned at or above price levels which eliminate the injurious effects of dumping and subsidisation.
V tej zavezi je zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik ponudil, da bo zadevni izdelek prodajal po ravneh cen ali nad ravnmi cen, ki odpravljajo škodljivi učinek dampinga in subvencioniranja.
The company will also provide the Commission with regular and detailed information concerning its exports to the Community, meaning that the undertaking can be monitored effectively by the Commission.
Družba bo Komisiji tudi redno zagotavljala podrobne podatke o svojem izvozu v Skupnost, kar pomeni, da lahko Komisija zavezo učinkovito spremlja.
In view of this, the undertaking offered by South Asian Petrochem Limited is acceptable.
Iz tega sledi, da je zaveza, ki jo je ponudila South Asian Petrochem Limited, sprejemljiva.
In order to enable the Commission to monitor effectively the company’s compliance with the undertaking, when the request for release for free circulation pursuant to the undertaking is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the duty will be conditional upon the presentation of an invoice containing at least the items of information listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2604/2000.
Da bi Komisija lahko učinkovito spremljala izpolnjevanje zaveze družbe, kadar je zahtevek za sprostitev v prost pretok na podlagi zaveze predložen ustreznemu carinskemu organu, bo oprostitev dajatev možna le s predložitvijo fakture, ki bo vseboval vsaj podatke, navedene v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 2604/2000.
This level of information is also necessary to enable customs authorities to ascertain with sufficient precision that the shipment corresponds to the commercial documents.
Ta raven podatkov je potrebna tudi zato, da lahko carinski organi z zadostno natančnostjo ugotovijo, da pošiljka ustreza trgovinskim dokumentom.
Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate rate of anti-dumping and countervailing duty will instead be payable.
Kadar taka faktura ni predložena ali kadar ne ustreza izdelku, predloženemu carinskim organom, se namesto tega plača ustrezna stopnja protidampinške dajatve in izravnalne dajatve.
In the event of a breach or withdrawal of the undertaking, or if there is reason to believe that the undertaking is being breached, a provisional or definitive duty may be imposed pursuant to Article 8(9) and (10) of the basic AD Regulation and, where applicable, pursuant to Article 13(9) and (10) of the basic AS Regulation,
V primeru kršitve ali umika zaveze ali suma kršitve se v skladu s členom 8(9) in (10) osnovne protidampinške uredbe in, kjer je potrebno, v skladu s členom 13(9) in (10) osnovne protisubvencijske uredbe lahko uvede začasna ali končna dajatev –
The table in Article 1 of Decision 2000/745/EC is hereby amended by adding the following:
Preglednica iz člena 1 Sklepa 2000/745/ES se spremeni:
Done at Brussels, 12 September 2005.
V Bruslju, 12. septembra 2005
OJ L 301, 30.11.2000, p. 21.
UL L 301, 30.11.2000, str. 21.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 83/2005 (OJ L 19, 21.1.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 83/2005 (UL L 19, 21.1.2005, str. 1).
OJ L 301, 30.11.2000, p. 1.
UL L 301, 30.11.2000, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 822/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 822/2004 (UL L 127, 29.4.2004, str. 3).
OJ L 301, 30.11.2000, p. 88.
UL L 301, 30.11.2000, str. 88.
Decision as amended by Decision 2002/232/EC (OJ L 78, 21.3.2002, p. 12).
Sklep, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2002/232/ES (UL L 78, 21.3.2002, str. 12).
OJ L 8, 12.1.2005, p. 9.
UL L 8, 12.1.2005, str. 9.
OJ C 8, 12.1.2005, p. 2.
UL C 8, 12.1.2005, str. 2.
concerning the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Arabsko republiko Egipt na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 310 in conjunction with the second sentence of Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 310 v povezavi z drugim stavkom člena 300(2) in drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) Pogodbe,
The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, was signed on behalf of the European Community and its Member States on 20 December 2004.
Protokol k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Arabsko republiko Egipt na drugi strani je bil podpisan v imenu Evropske skupnosti in njenih držav članic dne 20. decembra 2004.
The Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union, is hereby approved on behalf of the European Community and its Member States.
Protokol k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Arabsko republiko Egipt na drugi strani zaradi upoštevanja pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Ciper, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji se odobri v imenu Evropske skupnosti in njenih držav članic.
Assent delivered on 23 February 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Privolitev dana 23. februarja 2005 (še ni objavljena v Uradnem listu).
amending Decision 2000/439/EC on a financial contribution from the Community towards the expenditure incurred by certain Member States in collecting data, and for financing studies and pilot projects for carrying out the common fisheries policy
o spremembi Odločbe 2000/439/ES o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti k izdatkom, ki so jih imele države članice pri zbiranju podatkov, ter za financiranje študij in pilotnih projektov za izvajanje skupne ribiške politike
Decision 2000/439/EC [2] provides that the Community may grant a financial contribution towards the expenditure incurred by Member States in collecting fisheries data within the Community framework laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1543/2000 [3] for the period from 2002 to 2006 inclusive.
Odločba 2000/439/ES [2] določa, da lahko Skupnost odobri finančni prispevek k izdatkom, ki so jih imele države članice z zbiranjem podatkov o ribištvu v okviru Skupnosti, določenem z Uredbo (ES) št. 1543/2000 [3] za obdobje od 2002 do vključno 2006.
The collection and management of data in 2001 was organised by means of calls for proposals and invitations to tender in accordance with Decision 2000/439/EC.
Zbiranje in vodenje podatkov v letu 2001 je bilo organizirano s pozivi za zbiranje predlogov in javnimi razpisi v skladu z Odločbo 2000/439/ES.
For the financial assistance towards the expenditure incurred by certain Member States during the period 2002 to 2006, the preparation of the national programmes and the corresponding Commission Decision to co-finance them were planned to take place the year before their execution.
Priprava nacionalnih programov in ustrezna Odločba Komisije o njihovem sofinanciranju za finančno pomoč k izdatkom, ki so jih imele nekatere države članice v obdobju od 2002 do 2006, sta bila načrtovani v letu pred njihovim izvajanjem.
Therefore, the implementation period laid down in Article 1 of Decision 2000/439/EC is from 2000 to 2005.
Zato je v členu 1 Odločbe 2000/439/ES določeno obdobje za izvajanje od 2000 do 2005.
Due to an underestimation of the length of the necessary administrative and financial procedures, it proved impossible to follow the procedure of preparation and decision making in the year before the execution of the national programmes.
Zaradi podcenjevanja trajanja potrebnih upravnih in finančnih postopkov postopka priprave in odločanja ni bilo mogoče izpeljati v letu pred izvajanjem nacionalnih programov.