natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tejo Energia is controlled by the British company International Power, which holds 45 % of the shares, and by the Spanish company Endesa, with 35 % of the shares.
Družbo Tejo Energia upravljata britanska družba International Power, ki je lastnik 45 % njenih delnic, in španska družba Endesa, ki je njen 35-odstotni lastnik.
EDP and Electricité de France only hold a minority 10 % interest each, which does not seem to confer to either of them the possibility to exercise joint control over the company.
EDP in Electricité de France imata v tej družbi manjšinski delež, in sicer vsak po 10 %, kar pa jima ne zagotavlja udeležbe pri skupnem nadzoru nad podjetjem.
At the time of the notification Turbogás was controlled by the German power company RWE.
Ob prejetju obvestila je družbo Turbogás upravljala nemška energetska družba RWE.
EDP holds a 20 % stake, which does not seem to confer to it the possibility to exercise joint control over the company.
EDP je njen 20-odstotni lastnik, kar pa mu ne zagotavlja udeležbe pri skupnem nadzoru nad podjetjem.
RWE has since concluded a sales agreement with International Power.
Medtem sta RWE in družba International Power podpisala kupoprodajno pogodbo.
International Power’s purchase has been approved by the Portuguese Competition Authority.
Nakup s strani družbe International Power je odobril portugalski organ, pristojen za konkurenco.
35 TWh out of a total supply of 43 TWh in 2003.
35 TWh od skupnih 43 TWh v letu 2003.
Portugal will thus advance implementation of Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ L 176, 15.7.2003, p. 37), which provides the full opening the electricity retail markets as from 1 July 2007.
Portugalska bo tako nadaljevala z izvajanjem Direktive 2003/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 176, 15.7.2003, str. 37), ki predpisuje popolno odprtje maloprodajnih trgov električne energije s 1. julijem 2007.
See e.g. Case M. 2434 — Grupo Villar MIR/ENBW/Hidrocantabrico.
Glej npr. primer M.2434 – Grupo Villar MIR/ENBW/Hidrocantabrico.
CCGTs stands for ‘Combined Cycle Gas Turbines’ power plants.
Elektrarne s plinskimi turbinami za kombinirano proizvodnjo.
Respectively between 4 and 20 bar and below 4 bar.
Srednjetlačni plinovod: tlak med 4 in 20 bari; nizkotlačni plinovod: tlak pod 4 bari.
The Commission also has to assess intermediate steps in the evolution of the market structure, in particular as a situation, even though temporary, may have a strong detrimental impact on competition and, possibly, long-lasting effects.
Komisija mora oceniti tudi vmesne korake v razvoju strukture trga, zlasti če upoštevamo, da lahko ta položaj družbe EDP, ne glede na to, da je začasen, zelo slabo vpliva na konkurenco in pusti dolgotrajne posledice.
EDP’s 20 % shareholding in Turbogás confers to it certain blocking rights.
Družbi EDP daje 20-odstotni delež v Turbogásu določene pravice do izločanja.
That is: (i) EDP’s ability and incentive to control gas prices and raise its rivals’ costs, thereby foreclosing its actual and potential competitors and deterring entry; (ii) EDP’s ability to manage the constraints in the gas supply to CCGTs to the detriment of competing CCGTs; (iii) EDP’s access to proprietary information about its competitors’ costs and daily gas nominations, conferring on it a significant advantage.
Sem spadajo: (i) zmožnost družbe EDP, in hkrati njen interes, določanja cen plina in višanja stroškov konkurence, s čimer izloča svoje dejanske in morebitne konkurente iz igre, nove konkurente pa odvrača od vstopa na trg; (ii) zmožnost omejevanja dobave plina plinskim elektrarnam v škodo konkurenčnim plinskim elektrarnam; (iii) dostop družbe EDP do zaupnih podatkov o stroških konkurentov in do podatkov o predvideni dnevni porabi plina, kar ji prinaša odločilno prednost.
The deadline for the submission of remedies was 17 November 2004.
Rok za predložitev ukrepov je bil 17. november 2004.
accepting undertakings offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of potassium chloride originating in the Russian Federation
o sprejetju zavez, ponujenih v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom glede uvoza kalijevega klorida s poreklom iz Ruske federacije
By Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 [2], the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of potassium chloride originating, inter alia, in Russia (the existing measures).
Svet je z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz kalijevega klorida s poreklom, med drugim, iz Rusije („obstoječi ukrepi“).
In March 2004, by means of a notice published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3], the Commission launched, on its own initiative, a partial interim review of the existing measures to examine whether they should be amended to take account of the enlargement of the European Union to 25 Member States on 1 May 2004 (enlargement).
Marca 2004 je Komisija z obvestilom, objavljenim v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3], na lastno pobudo uvedla delni vmesni pregled veljavnih ukrepov, da bi raziskala, ali jih je zaradi širitve Evropske unije na 25 držav članic 1. maja 2004 („širitev“) treba spremeniti.
The results of that partial interim review showed that it was in the interests of the Community to provide for the temporary adaptation of the existing measures so as to avoid a sudden and excessively negative impact on importers and users in the 10 new Member States (the EU10) immediately following enlargement.
Izsledki navedenega delnega vmesnega pregleda so pokazali, da je v interesu Skupnosti, da predvidi začasno prilagoditev veljavnih ukrepov in tako prepreči nenaden in pretirano negativen vpliv na uvoznike in uporabnike v desetih novih državah članicah („EU10“) takoj po širitvi.
To this end, in May 2004, by Regulation (EC) No 1002/2004 [4], the Commission accepted undertakings from, inter alia, two exporting producers in Russia, namely JSC Silvinit and JSC Uralkali, in respect of their exports to the EU10.
Zato je Komisija maja 2004 z Uredbo (ES) št. 1002/2004 [4] sprejela zaveze, med drugim, dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov v Rusiji, in sicer JSC Silvinit in JSC Uralkali, glede njunega izvoza v EU10.
In addition, in order to provide for the exemption from the anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 on imports made under the terms of the undertakings, Regulation (EEC) No 3068/92 was amended by Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 [5].
Poleg tega se je z Uredbo (ES) št. 992/2004 spremenila Uredba (EGS) št. 3068/92, da bi se zagotovila oprostitev protidampinških dajatev, uvedenih z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3068/92 na uvoz, opravljen v okviru pogojev zavez [5].
In June 2005, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 858/2005 [6], the Commission accepted new undertakings for exports to the EU10 by these Russian companies for a further period which will expire on 13 April 2006.
Junija 2005 je Komisija v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 858/2005 [6] sprejela nove zaveze za izvoz teh ruskih družb v EU10 v nadaljnjem obdobju, ki se bo izteklo 13. aprila 2006.
In the meantime, in January 2004, separate requests were received from JSC Silvinit and JSC Uralkali (the applicants) for individual partial interim reviews of the existing measures pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation.
Medtem sta bila januarja 2004 prejeta ločena zahtevka JSC Silvinit in JSC Uralkali („vlagatelja“) za individualna delna vmesna pregleda veljavnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of partial interim reviews, the Commission published notices of initiation and commenced an investigation [7].
Potem, ko je Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom določila, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek delnih vmesnih pregledov, je objavila obvestili o začetku in začela s preiskavo [7].
Pursuant to the findings of these two partial interim reviews, by Regulation (EC) No 1891/2005, the Council amended the rates of the anti-dumping duty imposed against the applicants.
V skladu z ugotovitvami teh dveh delnih vmesnih pregledov je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 1891/2005 spremenil stopnje protidmpinške dajatve, uvedene proti vlagateljem.
As mentioned above, the Commission has accepted undertakings offered by the applicants with regard to their exports to the EU10.
Kot je omenjeno zgoraj, je Komisija sprejela zaveze, ki sta jih vlagatelja ponudila v zvezi z svojim izvozom v EU10.
In this regard it should be recalled from Regulation (EC) No 992/2004 that these undertakings were of a transitional nature and intended as interim measure allowing potassium chloride purchase prices in the EU10 to rise to those prevailing in the in the Community as constituted immediately before enlargement (the EU15).
Glede tega je treba opozoriti na dejstvo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 992/2004, da so bile te zaveze prehodne narave in naj bi kot prehodni ukrepi omogočile, da bi se nakupne cene kalijevega klorida v EU10 dvignile na raven prevladujočih cen v Skupnosti pred širitvijo (EU15).
Furthermore, these EU10 undertakings were not directly equivalent to an anti-dumping duty since the minimum import prices (MIPs) established were, exceptionally, at lower levels than would usually be the case (i.e they were set at levels which did not fully eliminate the injurious effect of dumping).
Poleg tega te zaveze EU10 niso bile neposredno enakovredne protidampinški dajatvi, saj so bile minimalne uvozne cene, ki so bile določene, izjemno nižje kot navadno (tj. določene so bile tako, da niso popolnoma preprečile škodljivega učinka dampinga).
However, within the framework of the partial interim reviews and in addition to the above mentioned undertakings already in force for their exports to the EU10, the applicants have also offered to sell the product concerned to customers in the EU15 at or above price levels which eliminate the injurious effect of dumping.
Vendar sta vlagatelja v okviru delnih vmesnih pregledov in poleg zgoraj omenjenih zavez, že veljavnih za njun izvoz v EU10, ponudila tudi prodajo zadevnega izdelka strankam v EU15 najmanj po tisti ceni, ki izniči škodljive posledice dampinga.
The undertakings offered in respect of sales to the EU10 will expire on 13 April 2006 and, until this time, the undertakings for sales to the EU10 and the undertakings offered for exports to the EU15 will operate in parallel.
Zaveza, ponujena za prodajo v EU10, bo prenehala veljati 13. aprila 2006, do takrat pa se bodo zaveze za prodajo v EU10 in zaveze za prodajo v EU15 izpolnjevale vzporedno.
It follows that, after the EU10 undertakings expire in April 2006, the higher MIPs established in the undertakings offered within the framework of the partial interim reviews for sales to the EU15 will also apply to sales to the EU10.
To pomeni, da se bodo višje minimalne prodajne cene, ki so bile določene za zaveze, ponujene v okviru delnih vmesnih pregledov za prodajo v EU15, po izteku veljavnosti zavez za EU10 aprila 2006 prav tako uporabljale za prodajo v EU10.
In this way, the same MIPs, set at non-injurious levels will apply to all imports by the applicants into the Community market as a whole, and the aim of the transitional and exceptional measures applicable to the exports to the EU10 in the period following enlargement will have been achieved.
Tako bodo za ves uvoz vlagateljev na celoten trg Skupnosti veljale enake minimalne prodajne cene, določene na neškodljivih ravneh; dosežen bo namen prehodnih in izjemnih ukrepov za uvoz v EU10 v obdobju po širitvi.
The companies will provide the Commission with regular and detailed information concerning their exports to the Community, meaning that the undertakings can be monitored effectively by the Commission.
Podjetja bodo Komisiji redno pošiljala podrobne podatke o svojem izvozu v Skupnost, kar pomeni, da bo lahko Komisija zaveze učinkovito spremljala.
In order that the Commission can monitor effectively the companies’ compliance with the undertakings, when the request for release for free circulation pursuant to an undertaking is presented to the relevant customs authority, exemption from the duty will be conditional upon the presentation of an invoice containing at least the items of information listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1891/2005.
Da bi Komisija lahko učinkovito spremljala izpolnjevanje zavez podjetij, kadar je zahtevek za sprostitev v prost promet na podlagi zaveze predložen ustreznemu carinskemu organu, bo oprostitev dajatev možna le s predložitvijo računa, ki bo vseboval vsaj podatke, navedene v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1891/2005.
This level of information is also necessary to enable customs authorities to ascertain with sufficient precision that the shipment corresponds to the commercial documents.
Ta stopnja podatkov je potrebna tudi zato, da lahko carinski organi z zadostno natančnostjo ugotovijo, ali pošiljka ustreza trgovinskim dokumentom.
Where no such invoice is presented, or when it does not correspond to the product presented to customs, the appropriate anti-dumping duty will instead be payable.
Kadar tak račun ni predložen ali kadar ne ustreza izdelku, predloženemu carinskim organom, se namesto tega plača ustrezna protidampinška dajatev.
The exporting producers should also be aware that, under the terms of the undertakings, if it is found that the undertakings become in any way difficult or impossible to monitor, or if they are breached in any way, the Commission is entitled to withdraw acceptance of the undertaking of the company concerned which would result in a definitive anti-dumping duty being imposed in its place.
Proizvajalci izvozniki se morajo prav tako zavedati, da ima Komisija v skladu s pogoji iz zavez pravico umakniti svoj pristanek na zavezo zadevne družbe in namesto tega uvesti dokončne protidampinške dajatve, če se ugotovi, da je postalo spremljanje zavez iz kakršnega koli razloga oteženo ali onemogočeno, ali če se zaveze kršijo.
In view of all these factors, the undertakings offered by the applicants within the framework of the partial interim reviews are acceptable,
Ob upoštevanju vseh teh dejavnikov so zaveze, ki jih vlagatelja ponujata v okviru delnih vmesnih pregledov, sprejemljive –
The undertakings offered by the exporting producers and companies mentioned below, in connection with the present anti-dumping proceedings concerning imports of potassium chloride originating in Russia are hereby accepted.
Sprejmejo se zaveze, ki so jih ponudili spodaj omenjeni proizvajalci izvozniki in družbe v zvezi s sedanjimi protidampinškimi postopki glede uvoza kalijevega klorida s poreklom iz Rusije.
Produced by JSC Silvinit, Solikamsk, Russia and sold by JSC International Potash Company, Moscow, Russia, to the first independent customer in the Community acting as an importer
Proizvaja JSC Silvinit, Solikamsk, Rusija in prodaja JSC International Potash Company, Moskva, Rusija prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti, ki nastopa kot uvoznik.
Produced and sold by JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Russia or produced by JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Russia and sold by Uralkali Trading SA, Geneva, Switzerland to the first independent customer in the Community acting as an importer
Proizvaja in prodaja JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Rusija ali proizvaja JSC Uralkali, Berezniki, Rusija in prodaja Uralkali Trading SA, Ženeva, Švica prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti, ki nastopa kot uvoznik.
OJ L 308, 24.10.1992, p. 41.
UL L 308, 24. 10. 1992, str. 41.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1891/2005 (see page 14 of this Official Journal).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1891/2005 (glej stran 14 tega Uradnega lista).
OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p. 16.
UL L 183, 20.5.2004, str. 16.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 588/2005 (OJ L 98, 16.4.2005, p. 11).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 588/2005 (UL L 98, 16.4.2005, str. 11).
OJ L 182, 19.5.2004, p. 23.
UL L 182, 19.5.2004, str. 23.
OJ L 143, 7.6.2005, p. 11.
UL L 143, 7.6.2005, str. 11.
OJ C 93, 17.4.2004, p. 2.
UL C 93, 17.4.2004, str. 2.
amending Decision 2000/609/EC as regards the importation of fresh ratite meat from Australia and Uruguay
o spremembi Odločbe 2000/609/ES glede uvoza svežega mesa ratitov iz Avstralije in Urugvaja
(notified under document number C(2005) 4408)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4408)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/494/EEC of 26 June 1991 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in and imports from third countries of fresh poultrymeat [1] and in particular Article 9(1), Article 11(1), Article 12 and Article 14(1) and Article 14a thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/494/EGS z dne 26. junija 1991 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali, ki urejajo trgovanje s svežim perutninskim mesom [1] znotraj Skupnosti in uvoz tega iz tretjih držav in zlasti členov 9(1), 11(1), 12, 14(1) in 14a Direktive,
Council Directive 92/118/EC of 17 December 1992 laying down animal health and public health requirements governing trade in and imports into the Community of products not subject to the said requirements laid down in specific Community rules referred to in Annex A (I) to Directive 89/662/EEC and, as regards pathogens, to Directive 90/425/EEC [2] and in particular Article 10 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/118/EGS z dne 17. decembra 1992 o zahtevah zdravstvenega varstva živali in javnozdravstvenega varstva, ki urejajo trgovino in uvoz v Skupnost za izdelke, ki niso predmet navedenih zahtev, določenih v posebnih pravilih Skupnosti iz Priloge A (I) Direktive 89/662/EGS, glede povzročiteljev bolezni pa v Direktivi 90/425/EGS [2] in zlasti člena 10 Direktive,
Commission Decision 94/85/EC of 16 February 1994 drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of fresh poultrymeat [3] includes Uruguay on that list.
Odločba Komisije 94/85/ES z dne 16. februarja 1994 o seznamu tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice dovoljujejo uvoz svežega perutninskega mesa [3], v ta seznam uvršča Urugvaj.
Commission Decision 2000/609/EC of 29 September 2000 laying down animal and public health conditions and veterinary certification for imports of farmed ratite meat amending Decision 94/85/EC drawing up a list of third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of fresh poultrymeat [4] provides that Member States are to authorise the importation of fresh meat of farmed ratites only from third countries or parts thereof listed in Annex I to Decision 2000/609/EC, subject to certain conditions.
Odločba Komisije 2000/609/ES z dne 29. septembra 2000 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali, javnozdravstvenih pogojih in izdajanju veterinarskih spričeval za uvoz mesa gojenih ratitov ter o spremembi Odločbe 94/85/ES o sestavi seznama tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz svežega perutninskega mesa [4] določa, da države članice dovolijo uvoz svežega mesa gojenih ratitov samo iz tretjih držav ali njihovih delov iz Priloge I k Odločbi 2000/609/ES pod določenimi pogoji.
At present, Uruguay is not included in that Decision.
Urugvaj trenutno ni na seznamu navedene Odločbe.
Following a Commission mission in October 2004, subsequent follow-up and guarantees provided by Uruguay, the animal and public health situation is now satisfactory so as to allow that country to be included on the list of approved third countries set out in Annex I to Decision 2000/609/EC.
Po misiji, ki jo je Komisija opravila oktobra 2004, ter poznejših nadaljnjih ukrepih in zagotovilih Urugvaja je zdaj zdravstveno stanje živali in ljudi zadovoljivo, kar omogoča navedeni državi vključitev v seznam odobrenih tretjih držav iz Priloge I k Odločbi 2000/209/ES.
In view of Uruguay’s animal health status as regards Newcastle disease, it is appropriate that imports of fresh meat of farmed ratites from Uruguay are accompanied by the model health attestation ‘A’ as laid down in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2000/609/EC.
Glede zdravstvenega stanja živali v Urugvaju zaradi atipične kokošje kuge je ustrezno, da uvoze svežega mesa gojenih ratitov iz Urugvaja spremlja vzorec „A“ potrdila o zdravstvenem stanju iz dela 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2000/609/ES.
Decision 2000/609/EC, as amended by Decision 2004/118/EC, provides erroneously that fresh meat of farmed ratites from Australia must be accompanied by the model health attestation ‘A’ as laid down in Part 2 of Annex II to Decision 2000/609/EC, instead of the model health attestation ‘B’ laid down in that Annex.
Odločba 2000/609/ES, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/118/ES, pomotoma določa, da mora sveže meso gojenih ratitov iz Avstralije namesto vzorca „B“ potrdila o zdravstvenem stanju iz dela 2 Priloge II k Odločbi 2000/609/ES spremljati vzorec „A“ potrdila o zdravstvenem stanju iz navedene priloge.
That mistake should therefore be corrected.
Navedeno napako je zato treba popraviti.
Decision 2000/609/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2000/609/ES je treba zato ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Decision 2000/609/EC shall be replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2000/609/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
OJ L 268, 24.9.1991, p. 35.
UL L 268, 24.9.1991, str. 35.
Directive as last amended by Directive 1999/89/EC (OJ L 300, 23.11.1999, p. 17).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 1999/89/ES (UL L 300, 23.11.1999, str. 17).
Corrected version: OJ L 208, 10.6.2004, p. 63.
Popravljena različica: UL L 208, 10.6.2004, str. 63.
List of third countries or parts of third countries from which Member States are to authorise the importation of fresh meat of farmed ratites
Seznam tretjih držav ali delov držav, iz katerih lahko države članice uvažajo sveže meso gojenih ratitov
Parts of the territory
Deli ozemlja
Model certificate to be used
Vzorec spričevala, ki naj se uporabi
(A or B)
(A ali B)
The States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul
Države Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, Sao Paulo in Mato Grosso do Sul
Council Decision 2005/805/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2005/805/SZVP
of 21 November 2005
z dne 21. novembra 2005
implementing Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP appointing a Special Representative of the European Union for Sudan
o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 2005/556/SZVP o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za Sudan
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP of 18 July 2005 appointing a Special Representative of the European Union for Sudan [1], and in particular Article 5(1) thereof, in conjunction with Articles 14, 18(5) and 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2005/556/SZVP z 18. julija 2005 o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za Sudan [1] in zlasti člena 5(1) tega skupnega ukrepa, v povezavi s členi 14, 18(5) in 23(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
On 18 July 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP appointing a Special Representative of the European Union (EUSR) for Sudan.
Svet je 18. julija 2005 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2005/556/SZVP o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije (PPEU) za Sudan.
On 21 November 2005 the Council adopted Decision 2005/806/CFSP implementing Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan [2], whereby a new financial reference amount intended to cover expenditure related to the implementation of section II of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP [3] was set for a further 6-month period.
Svet je 21. novembra 2005 sprejel Sklep 2005/806/SZVP o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 2005/557/SZVP o civilno-vojaškem podpornem ukrepu Evropske unije za misijo Afriške unije v regiji Darfur v Sudanu [2], pri čemer je bil novi referenčni finančni znesek za kritje odhodkov, povezanih z izvajanjem oddelka II Skupnega ukrepa 2005/557/SZVP [3], določen za nadaljnjih šest mesecev.
As a consequence, the Council should decide on the financial reference amount for the continuation of Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP for a further 6-month period.
Svet mora zato sprejeti sklep o referenčnem finančnem znesku za nadaljevanje Skupnega ukrepa 2005/556/SZVP za nadaljnjih šest mesecev.