natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
RO-SQ 20.1 (new)
RO-SQ 20.1 (nov)
Subject Adoption of RO-SQ 15.8.
Zadeva Sprejetje RO-SQ 15.8.
Reference to the national legislation Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2000 m. kovo 23 d. nutarimas Nr. 337 ‘Dėl pavojingų krovinių vežimo kelių transportu Lietuvos Respublikoje’ (Government Resolution No 337 on the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road in the Republic of Lithuania, adopted on 23 March 2000).
Sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2000 m. kovo 23 d. nutarimas Nr. 337 „Dėl pavojingų krovinių vežimo kelių transportu Lietuvos Respublikoje“ (vladna Resolucija št. 337 o prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti v Republiki Litvi, sprejeti 23. marca 2000).
RO-LT 14.12 (new)
RO-LT 14.12 (nov)
Subject Carriage of UN 0335 FIREWORKS.
Zadeva Prevoz izdelkov za ognjemete OZN 0335.
Reference to the Annex to the Directive Annex B, section 7.2.4, V2 (1).
Sklicevanje na Prilogo k Direktivi Priloga B, oddelek 7.2.4, V2 (1).
Content of the Annex to the Directive Provisions for the use of EX/II and EX/III vehicles.
Vsebina Priloge k Direktivi Določbe v zvezi z uporabo vozil EX/II in EX/III.
Reference to the national legislation Appendix S — Specific regulations for the domestic transport of dangerous goods by road issued in accordance with the Transport of Dangerous Goods Act.
Sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo Appendix S – Specific regulations for the domestic transport of dangerous goods by road issued in accordance with the Transport of Dangerous Goods Act (Dodatek S – Posebni predpisi za notranji prevoz nevarnega blaga po cesti, ki so bili izdani v skladu z Zakonom o prevozu nevarnega blaga).
Content of the national legislation When carrying UN 0335 FIREWORKS, Special Provision V2 (1) in 7.2.4 is only applicable for a net explosive content of more than 3000 kg (4000 kg with trailer), provided the fireworks has been assigned to UN 0335 according to the default fireworks classification table in 2.1.3.5.5 of the fourteenth revised edition of the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods.
Vsebina nacionalne zakonodaje Pri prevozu izdelkov za ognjemete OZN 0335 se posebna določba V2 (1) in 7.2.4 uporablja samo za neto vsebino eksploziva 3000 kg ali več (4000 kg s priklopnim vozilom) pod pogojem, da se izdelki za ognjemete dodelijo OZN 0335 v skladu s privzeto klasifikacijsko preglednico iz točke 2.1.3.5.5 štirinajste revidirane izdaje Priporočil OZN o prevozu nevarnega blaga.
Such assignment shall be made with the agreement of the competent authority.
Ta dodelitev se opravi v dogovoru s pristojnim organom.
A verification of the assignment shall be carried on the transport unit.
Preverjanje dodelitve se izvede na prevozni enoti.
Comments The carriage of fireworks is limited in time to two short periods of the year, the turn of the year and the turn of the month April/May.
Pripombe Prevoz izdelkov za ognjemete je časovno omejen na dve kratki obdobji v letu: ob novem letu in na prehodu iz aprila v maj.
The carriage from consigners to terminals can be done by the present fleet of EX-approved vehicles without great problems. However, the distribution of fireworks from terminals to shopping areas and the surplus back to the terminal is limited due to lack of EX-approved vehicles.
Prevoz od dobaviteljev do terminalov se lahko brez večjih težav opravi z obstoječimi vozili, ki imajo homologacijo EX. Vseeno pa je distribucija izdelkov za ognjemete od terminalov do trgovskih središč in vrnitev presežka nazaj do terminalov omejena zaradi pomanjkanja vozil, ki imajo homologacijo EX. Prevoznikov naložbe v pridobitev takšne homologacije ne zanimajo, ker ne morejo povrniti svojih stroškov.
The carriers are not interested to invest in such approvals because they cannot recover their expenses.
S tem je ogrožen sam obstoj dobaviteljev izdelkov za ognjemete, ker svojih izdelkov ne morejo spraviti na trg.
A similar type of exception is for UN 0336 FIREWORKS incorporated in Special Provision 651, section 3.3.1 of ADR 2005.
Podobna vrsta izjeme velja za izdelke za ognjemete OZN 0336, ki je vključena v posebno določbo 651, oddelek 3.3.1 ADR 2005.
RO-LT 20.1 (new)
RO-LT 20.1 (nov)
Subject Adoption of RO-LT 4.1.
Zadeva Sprejetje RO-LT 4.1.
Reference to national legislation Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2000 m. kovo 23 d. nutarimas Nr. 337 ‘Dėl pavojingų krovinių vežimo kelių transportu Lietuvos Respublikoje’ (Government Resolution No 337 on the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Road in the Republic of Lithuania, adopted on 23 March 2000).
Sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2000 m. kovo 23 d. nutarimas Nr. 337 „Dėl pavojingų krovinių vežimo kelių transportu Lietuvos Respublikoje“ (vladna Resolucija št. 337 o prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti v Republiki Litvi, sprejeti 23. marca 2000).
RO-LT 20.2 (new)
RO-LT 20.2 (nov)
Subject Adoption of RO-LT 4.2.
Zadeva Sprejetje RO-LT 4.2.
Content of the Annex to the Directive Requirements for construction and testing of gas receptacles.
Vsebina Priloge k Direktivi Zahteve za izdelavo in testiranje plinskih posod.
Reference to the national legislation The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2004: Regulation 5(15).
Sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2004: Regulation 5(15).
Content of the Annex to the Directive Requirements for the construction and testing of packagings.
Vsebina Priloge k Direktivi Zahteve za izdelavo in testiranje embalaže.
Reference to national legislation The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2004: Regulation 7(4) and Regulation 36 Authorisation Number 13.
Sklicevanje na nacionalno zakonodajo The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2004: Regulation 7(4) and Regulation 36 Authorisation Number 13.
This leads to a risk for the whole existence for the consigners of fireworks because they cannot get their products on the market. When using this derogation, the classification of the fireworks must have been made on basis of the default list in the UN Recommendations, in order to get the best-updated classification possible.
Za pridobitev čimbolj posodobljene klasifikacije je morala biti pri uporabi tega odstopanja klasifikacija izdelkov za ognjemete narejena na podlagi privzetega seznama Priporočil OZN.
on the signing by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty
o podpisu, s strani Evropske skupnosti, Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Skupnosti za energijo
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 47(2), 55, 83, 89, 95, 133, and 175 in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 47(2), 55, 83, 89, 95, 133 in 175 v povezavi s prvim stavkom prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe,
In accordance with the Council Decision of 17 May 2004, the Commission has negotiated the Treaty establishing the Energy Community, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Energy Community Treaty’, with the Republic of Albania, the Republic of Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Montenegro, Romania, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (pursuant to the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244).
V skladu s Sklepom Sveta z dne 17. maja 2004 se je Komisija pogajala o Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Skupnosti za energijo z Republiko Albanijo, Republiko Bolgarijo, Bosno in Hercegovino, Republiko Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Republiko Črno goro, Romunijo, Republiko Srbijo in Misijo začasne uprave Združenih narodov na Kosovu (v skladu z Resolucijo Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1244).
Subject to its possible conclusion at a later stage, the Energy Community Treaty initialled on 31 May 2005 should be signed on behalf of the Community,
Ob upoštevanju možnosti njene poznejše sklenitve, je treba Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Skupnosti za energijo, parafirano 31. maja 2005, podpisati v imenu Skupnosti –
The signing of the Energy Community Treaty is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.
S tem sklepom se odobri podpis, v imenu Skupnosti, Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Skupnosti za energijo.
The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Energy Community Treaty on behalf of the Community, subject to its conclusion.
Predsednik Sveta je pooblaščen za imenovanje oseb(-e), pooblaščenih(-e) za podpis v imenu Evropske skupnosti Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Skupnosti za energijo, ob upoštevanju njene kasnejše sklenitve.
concerning the aid scheme that Italy plans to implement to compensate processing and marketing cooperatives for losses caused by an outbreak of blue tongue — Article 5 of Region of Sardinia Law No 22 of 17 November 2000
o shemi za pomoč, ki jo ima Italija namen izvajati za zadruge, ki se ukvarjajo s predelavo in trženjem, za nadomestilo škode, ki jo je povzročila bolezen modrikastega jezika – člen 5 Zakona dežele Sardinija z dne 17. novembra 2000
(notified under document number C(2004) 471)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 471)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti in zlasti prvega pododstavka člena 88(2) Pogodbe,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the above Article,
po pozivu zadevnih strani k predložitvi pripomb v skladu z navedenim členom,
By letter dated 24 November 2000, registered on 28 November 2000, the Permanent Representation of Italy to the European Union notified the Commission, under Article 88(3) of the Treaty, of Region of Sardinia Law No 22 concerning measures to enable livestock farmers to cope with the epizootic disease blue tongue [1], hereafter referred to as ‘Law No 22/2000’.
S pismom z dne 24. novembra 2000, vpisanim v evidenco 28. novembra 2000, je stalno predstavništvo Italije pri Evropski uniji v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe obvestilo Komisijo glede Zakona dežele Sardinija št. 22 z dne 17. novembra 2000 [1] o ukrepih za pomoč rejcem v boju proti bolezni živali, imenovani bolezen modrikastega jezika (v nadaljevanju „Zakon dežele Sardinija št. 22/2000“).
Article 10 of the Law makes the grant of some aid conditional on Commission approval under the procedure provided for in Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty.
Člen 10 Zakona določa, da mora nekatere oblike pomoči odobriti Komisija v okviru postopka iz členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe.
By letter dated 15 December 2000, registered on 19 December 2000, the Permanent Representation of Italy to the European Union sent the Commission the additional information requested in a letter dated 13 December 2000.
S pismom z dne 15. decembra 2000, vpisanim v evidenco 19. decembra 2000, je stalno predstavništvo Italije v Evropski uniji predložilo Komisiji dodatne podatke, ki jih je zahtevala s pismom z dne 13. decembra 2000.
By letter dated 2 February 2001, the Commission informed Italy of its decision to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of this aid.
S pismom z dne 2. februarja 2001 je Komisija obvestila Italijo o svojem sklepu, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi z zadevno pomočjo.
The Commission Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [2].
Sklep Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [2].
The Commission called on the interested parties to make their comments on the measure in question.
Komisija je povabila zadevne strani k predložitvi pripomb v zvezi z zadevnim ukrepom.
In that same Decision, the Commission approved the aid measures provided for in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Law No 22/2000, taking the view that they complied with the conditions for being considered aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities within the meaning of Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty.
V istem sklepu je Komisija dovolila pomoč iz členov 2, 3 in 4 Zakona št. 22/2000, ker meni, da izpolnjujejo vse potrebno, da se ta pomoč šteje kot pomoč za pospeševanje razvoja nekaterih gospodarskih dejavnosti v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe.
The Italian authorities submitted no comments on the measures in question.
Italijanski organi niso predložili nobene pripombe v zvezi z zadevnimi ukrepi.
The Commission received no comments from other interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb drugih zadevnih strani.
The aid is based on Article 5 of Region of Sardinia Law No 22/2000 concerning measures to compensate processing and marketing cooperatives for losses caused by blue tongue.
Pomoč temelji na členu 5 Zakona dežele Sardinije št. 22/2000 o ukrepih v korist zadrug, ki se ukvarjajo s predelavo in trženjem, za nadomestilo škode, ki jo je povzročila bolezen modrikastega jezika.
In August 2000, blue tongue broke out in Sardinia and, despite the measures taken by the authorities, spread throughout the island.
Avgusta 2000 se je na Sardiniji pri ovcah pojavila bolezen modrikastega jezika in se razširila po celem otoku kljub ukrepom, ki so jih sprejeli javni organi.
The spread of the disease was facilitated by climatic conditions (hot, dry weather).
Širjenje bolezni so olajšale podnebne razmere (vroče in suho vreme).
In order to combat the disease, on 28 August 2000 the Italian health authorities prohibited the movement of domestic and wild ruminants originating in or coming from the Region of Sardinia (including sperm, ova and embryos) to the rest of national territory and to the other Member States of the EU.
V boju proti boleznim živali so italijanski organi za zdravstveno varstvo 28. avgusta 2000 prepovedali premik domačih in divjih prežvekovalcev, ki izvirajo ali prihajajo s Sardinije (vključno s spermo, jajčeci in zarodki), v druge dele države in druge države članice Evropske unije.
A ban was also placed on the movement of those animals from the Province of Cagliari to the rest of Sardinia and the veterinary services of other regions were ordered to carry out clinical checks on all holdings onto which sheep from Sardinia had been introduced within the past two months.
Poleg tega je bila odrejena prepoved premika navedenih živali iz pokrajine Cagliari v preostale dele dežele in obveznost, da veterinarske službe drugih dežel izvajajo klinične preglede v podjetjih, kamor so bile pred manj kot dvema mesecema pripeljane ovce s Sardinije.
The regional authorities then adopted Decree No 34 of 5 September 2000 on emergency measures for the control of blue tongue [3], which prohibited the movement from holdings anywhere in Sardinia of sheep, goats, cattle, buffaloes and reared animals of wild species.
Deželni organi so sprejeli tudi Uredbo št. 34 z dne 5. septembra 2000 o nujnih predpisih za nadzor bolezni modrikastega jezika [3], ki na celotnem ozemlju Sardinije prepoveduje selitve podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo z vzrejo ovc, koz, goveda, bivolov in divjih vrst živali.
The Decree also made the control of insects carrying the disease compulsory.
Uredba je določila tudi obvezen boj proti mrčesu, ki prenaša malarijo.
On 16 October 2000, the Sardinian health authorities adopted the plan to control and eradicate blue tongue in Sardinia and on 25 October 2000 the Regional Council of Sardinia adopted Law No 22/2000 concerning measures to enable livestock farmers to cope with the epizootic disease blue tongue, which was notified to the Commission for examination of compliance with Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty.
oktobra 2000 so deželni organi za zdravstveno varstvo sprejeli načrt za boj proti bolezni modrikastega jezika na Sardiniji in njeno izkoreninjenje, 25. oktobra 2000 je deželni svet Sardinije sprejel Zakon št. 22/2000 o ukrepih za pomoč rejcem v boju proti bolezni živali, imenovani bolezen modrikastega jezika, ki je bil pozneje predložen Komisiji v pregled skladnosti s členi 87, 88 in 89 Pogodbe.
The measures provided for in Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Law No 22/2000 were considered to be compatible with the common market [4].
Ukrepi iz členov 2, 3 in 4 Zakona št. 22/2000 so združljivi s skupnim trgom [4].
The Commission decided to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty with regard to the aid provided for in Article 5 of the Law.
Komisija se je odločila, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe v zvezi s pomočjo iz člena 5 navedenega zakona.
Article 5 of Law No 22/2000 authorises the regional authorities to grant aid to undertakings and cooperatives having their registered office in Sardinia involved in the harvesting, processing, packaging and marketing of crop and animal products and which have suffered a reduction in supplies due under statutory or contractual obligations of more than 20 % (less-favoured agricultural areas) or 30 % (other areas) compared with the average of the last three years.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 22/2000 dovoljuje deželni upravi, da dodeli pomoč podjetjem in zadrugam s sedežem na Sardiniji, ki se ukvarjajo z zbiranjem, predelavo, pakiranjem in trženjem kmetijskih proizvodov in proizvodov živalskega izvora in ki se jim je oddaja iz pogodbenih ali statutarnih obveznosti zmanjšala za več kot 20 % (prikrajšana kmetijska območja) ali 30 % (druga območja) glede na povprečje zadnjih treh let.
This aid is intended to compensate for losses due to the lack of raw materials for processing and is limited to losses related to the reduction of the supplies from the cooperatives' members.
Ta pomoč je namenjena za nadomestilo izgub zaradi pomanjkanja surovin za predelavo in je omejena na izgube, povezane z zmanjšanjem oddaje članov.
A total of LIT 5 billion (around EUR 2582280) was provided for aid for 2000.
Predviden znesek pomoči za leto 2000 je 5 milijard ITL (približno 2582280 EUR).
The Commission decided to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty because of doubts regarding the compatibility of the scheme with the common market.
Komisija se je odločila, da sproži postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe zaradi nekaterih dvomov glede združljivosti zadevne sheme za pomoč s skupnim trgom.
These doubts concerned, in particular, the fact that point 11.4 of the Guidelines does not provide for granting compensation to processing undertakings for losses caused by epizootic diseases.
Dvomljivo je zlasti dejstvo, da točka 11.4 Smernic ne vsebuje nobene določbe v zvezi z izplačilom odškodnine predelovalnim podjetjem za škodo zaradi bolezni živali.
The Commission considered that, even though the Italian authorities had decided to restrict aid to cooperatives, no causal link had been established between the disease (blue tongue) and the reduction in supplies.
Komisija meni, da kljub odločitvi italijanskih organov, da upravičenost do prejemanja pomoči pridržijo za zadruge, ni dokazov za vzročno zvezo med boleznijo (modrikastega jezika) in zmanjšanjem oddaje.
In particular, the region had been hit by drought (see Aid N 745/2000), which could have contributed to the reduction in supplies.
Deželo je na primer prizadela zlasti suša (glej pomoč N 745/2000), ki je lahko prispevala k zmanjšanju oddanih količin.
In addition, certain cooperatives could have suffered a reduction in raw materials received for reasons other than blue tongue (or the drought).
Poleg tega so se v nekaterih zadrugah lahko zmanjšale surovine zaradi drugih razlogov, ne zaradi bolezni modrikastega jezika (ali suše).
Under point 11.3.8 of the Guidelines, which lays down that aid may be paid only to farmers or to a producer organisation of which farmers are members for damage caused by adverse weather events, it is not possible to apply these rules by analogy to processing undertakings that have suffered losses from blue tongue.
V skladu s točko 11.3.8 Smernic, ki omogoča izplačevanje odškodnin kmetom ali organizacijam pridelovalcev, ki jim pripadajo, samo za škodo, ki je nastala zaradi neugodnih vremenskih razmer, teh pravil ni mogoče uporabljati po analogiji za predelovalna podjetja za izgube zaradi bolezni modrikastega jezika.
As a general rule, the Commission considers that agricultural processing undertakings have a degree of flexibility in the management of their sources of supply.
Komisija je na splošno menila, da so živilskopredelovalni obrati dovolj prilagodljivi pri upravljanju virov nabave.
This can, of course, involve additional costs for raw materials and a reduction in profitability, but this does not appear to justify a direct application of the rules applicable to agricultural production.
To je lahko povzročilo dodatne stroške za surovine in manjšo dobičkonosnost, vendar ne upravičuje neposredne uporabe predpisov, ki se uporabljajo za kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
In the absence of any other legal basis for examining and possibly approving the aid measure provided for in Article 5 of Law No 22/2000, it seemed that the aid should be regarded as operating aid, i.e. aid intended to cover expenditure which processing undertakings would normally bear themselves in the day-to-day administration of their activities.
Kolikor ni drugih pravnih podlag za preverjanje in morebitno odobritev pomoči iz člena 5 Zakona št. 22/2000, se zdi, da je treba to pomoč obravnavati kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje ali pomoč živilskopredelovalnim podjetjem za zmanjšanje stroškov, ki jih imajo običajno pri tekočem upravljanju svojih dejavnosti.
Such aid must in principle be considered as incompatible with the common market.
Takšno pomoč je načeloma treba šteti kot nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom.
Following the decision to open the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) of the Treaty, Italy sent the Commission no comments.
Po odločitvi o sprožitvi postopka iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe italijanski organi niso predložili pripomb službam Komisije.
Under Article 87(1) of the Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods is, insofar as it affects trade between Member States, incompatible with the common market.
V skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe je vsaka pomoč, ki jo dodeli država članica, ali kakršna koli vrsta pomoči iz državnih sredstev, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco z dajanjem prednosti posameznim podjetjem ali proizvodnji posameznega blaga, nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami.
Article 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal [5] lays down that, save as otherwise provided in the Regulation, Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty apply to the production of and trade in the products covered by that Regulation.
Člen 40 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1254/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso [5] določa uporabo členov 87, 88 in 89 Pogodbe za proizvodnjo in trgovanje s proizvodi iz Uredbe, razen če v navedeni uredbi ni določeno drugače.
Similarly, Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2529/2001 of 19 December 2001 on the common organisation of the market in sheepmeat and goatmeat [6] lays down that, save as otherwise provided for in the Regulation, Articles 87, 88 and 89 of the Treaty apply to the production of and trade in the products referred to in Article 1 of that Regulation.
Podobno določa Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2529/2001 z dne 19. decembra 2001 o skupni ureditvi trga za ovčje in kozje meso [6], katere člen 23 določa uporabo členov 87, 88 in 89 Pogodbe za proizvodnjo proizvodov in trgovino s proizvodi iz člena 1, razen če v navedeni uredbi ni določeno drugače.
Article 5 of Law No 22/2000 provides for aid to compensate agricultural undertakings and cooperatives for losses due to a lack of raw material for processing caused by a reduction in deliveries from members following the outbreak of blue tongue.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 22/2000 določa pomoč, namenjeno kmetijskim podjetjem in zadrugam, kot nadomestilo za izgube zaradi pomanjkanja surovin za predelavo, ki je posledica manjše oddaje članov po izbruhu epidemije bolezni modrikastega jezika.