natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To this extent, no distinction can be drawn between the aid measures notified initially and those unlawfully granted since the outset.
V tem pogledu ni razlike med ukrepi pomoči, ki so bili prijavljeni prvotno, in ukrepi pomoči, ki so bili že od začetka dodeljeni nezakonito.
Accordingly, the Commission takes the view that Germany should order the beneficiary to repay the aid, including interest, within a period of two months as of the date of this decision.
Komisija je zato mnenja, da bi morala Nemčija v roku dveh mesecev od izdaje te odločbe odrediti vračilo pomoči skupaj z obrestmi od prejemnika pomoči.
It also deems it necessary that, within a period of two months as of the date of this decision, Germany submit the documents which prove that recovery proceedings have been initiated against the beneficiary of the unlawful aid (such as circulars and recovery orders),
Poleg tega se zdi Komisiji potrebno, da ji Nemčija v roku dveh mesecev od izdaje te odločbe posreduje dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje, da je bil proti prejemniku nezakonite pomoči uveden postopek za izterjavo (kot npr. upravna okrožnica in nalog za izterjavo) –
The State aid which Germany has implemented for Chemische Werke Piesteritz is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki jo je Nemčija dodelila v korist podjetja Chemische Werke Piesteritz, ni združljiva s Skupnim trgom.
The aid consists of the following measures:
Pomoč obsega naslednje ukrepe:
Measure 4: The waiver of a purchase price totalling EUR 3181769.
Ukrep 4: Oprostitev nakupne cene v višini 3181769 EUR.
Measure 5: The waiver of interest accumulated on the purchase price up to the end of 1996 and amounting to EUR 237239.
Ukrep 5: Oprostitev obresti, ki so se na nakupno ceno nabrale do konca leta 1996, v višini 237239 EUR.
Measure 6: An investment grant of EUR 1799747.
Ukrep 6: Subvencija za naložbe v višini 1799747 EUR.
The aid element of the loan is the difference between the reference interest rate plus 400 basis points and the interest rate at which the loan was provided by the BvS.
Element pomoči posojila ustreza razliki med referenčno obrestno mero z dodatkom 400 odstotnih točk in obrestno mero, po kateri je zavod BvS dal posojilo.
Measure 8 (including Measure 8a): A guarantee/loan from the BvS of EUR 869196. The aid element of the guarantee is calculated as the difference between the reference interest rate plus 400 basis points and the interest rate at which the guaranteed loan was provided.
Ukrep 8 (vključno z 8a): Poroštvo/posojilo zavoda BvS v višini 869196 EUR. Element pomoči poroštva se izračuna kot razlika med referenčno obrestno mero z dodatkom 400 odstotnih točk in obrestno mero, po kateri je bilo dano s poroštvom zavarovano posojilo.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiary the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlawfully made available to the beneficiary.
Nemčija sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da prejemnik vrne pomoč, navedeno v členu 1 in dano na razpolago nezakonito.
The loan under Measure 7 (including Measure 7a) and the loan under Measure 8 (including Measure 8a) shall be discontinued within two months following notification of this Decision.
Posojilo v skladu z ukrepom 7 (vključno s 7a) in posojilo v skladu z ukrepom 8 (vključno z 8a) v roku dveh mesecev po izdaji te odločbe ne bosta več na razpolago.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the Decision.
Izterjava pomoči se izvede nemudoma in v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje, kolikor ti omogočajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršitev odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery.
Zneski, ki se morajo vrniti, vključujejo obresti, ki se plačajo od datuma, ko je bila nezakonita pomoč prejemniku na razpolago, do dejanskega vračila.
Interest shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [27].
Obresti se izračunajo v skladu z določbami iz poglavja V Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 [27].
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
Nemčija obvesti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po objavi te odločbe o ukrepih, sprejetih za izvajanje te odločbe.
Germany shall provide this information using the questionnaire attached in the Annex to this Decision.
V ta namen Nemčija uporabi vprašalnik, ki je priložen v prilogi te odločbe.
In particular, it shall submit to the Commission all documents proving that recovery proceedings have been initiated against the beneficiary of the unlawful aid.
Nemčija bo Komisiji predložila še zlasti vso dokumentacijo, ki dokazuje, da je bil proti prejemniku nezakonite pomoči uveden postopek za izterjavo.
OJ C 226, 11.8.2001, p. 2.
UL C 226, 11.8.2001, str. 2.
OJ C 51, 18.2.1998, p. 7.
UL C 51, 18.2.1998, str. 7.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2001, Case T-73/98 Société chimique Prayon-Rupel SA v Commission of the European Communities [2001] ECR II-867.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje, 15. marec 2001, zadeva T-73/98, Société Chimique Prayon Rupel SA/Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, PSES 2001, str. II-867.
CWP changed its accounting method in 1998.
Podjetje CWP je leta 1998 spremenilo metodo za predložitev poročil.
The data for 1998 correspond to October-December 1998.
Podatki za leto 1998 veljajo za obdobje med oktobrom in decembrom 1998.
Following the information injunction, Germany informed the Commission that CWP had a wholly owned subsidiary, KEB Kali Elektrolyse GmbH, Bitterfeld.
V okviru odredbe o predložitvi podatkov je Nemčija obvestila Komisijo, da ima podjetje CWP v lasti 100 % hčerinsko podjetje, KEB Kali Elektrolyse GmbH, Bitterfeld.
The subsidiary had been set up in 1998 in order to operate a potassium electrolysis unit.
To hčerinsko podjetje je bilo ustanovljeno leta 1998, da bi vodilo objekt za elektrolizo kalija.
Since this did not function properly, the company was renamed Vopelius-Bioprodukte GmbH and subsequently sold to Vopelius Chemie AG.
Ker to ni šlo, se je podjetje preimenovalo v Vopelius-Bioprodukte GmbH in ga je kasneje kupilo podjetje Vopelius Chemie AG.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Deli tega besedila so urejeni na način, ki zagotavlja, da zaupne informacije niso razkrite; ti deli so v oglatih oklepjih in označeni z zvezdico.
List No 33 concerning BvS’s’ follow-up negotiations reported as being concluded in August 1999.
Seznam nadaljevalnih pogajanj zavoda BvS, ki so bila avgusta 1999 priglašena kot zaključena, št. 33.
The waiver was conditional on a new associate of CWP contributing a liquidity-related capital increase of EUR 2,05 million (DEM 4 million).
Pogoj za oprostitev je bil, da nov partner podjetja CWP plača kapitalski vložek v višini 2,05 milijona EUR (4 milijona DEM), ki je odvisen od njegove likvidnosti.
Reinigung von Nassphosphorsäure durch Flüssig-flüssig-Extraktion, DLM, November 1997.
Izvedensko mnenje „Reinigung von Nassphosphorsäure durch Flüssig-flüssig-Extraktion“ (Čiščenje mokre fosforne kisline s tekočo-tekočo-ekstrakcijo), DLM, november 1997.
Betriebskostenabschätzung für eine Extraktionsanlage zur Extraktion von Nassphosphorsäure, DLM, September 1996.
„Betriebskostenabschätzung für eine Extraktionsanlage zur Extraktion von Nassphosphorsäure“ (Ocena obratovalnih stroškov za ekstrakcijski objekt za ekstrakcijo mokre fosforne kisline), DLM, september 1996.
Annex 42 to the letter of 4 July 2003.
Priloga 42 k dopisu z dne 4. julija 2003.
Point 3.1 of THA scheme N 768/94 states that privatisations of companies must be notified to the Commission only if the company has more than 250 workers at the time of privatisation (SG(95) D/1062 of 1.2.1995).
Pod točko 3.1 programa pomoči THA N 768/94 piše, da je o postopkih privatizacije Komisijo treba obvestiti samo, če ima podjetje v času privatizacije več kot 205 zaposlenih (SG(95) D/1062, 1.2.1995).
N 413/91, Guarantee rules of the Land of Saxony-Anhalt (SG(91) D/15633 of 8.8.1991).
N 413/91, Direktiva o poroštvih dežele Saška-Anhalt (SG(91) D/15633, 8.8.1991).
General Plan of the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for improving regional economic structures, N 123/97 (SG(97) D/7104 of 18.8.1997 and SG(98) D/7191 of 18.8.1998).
Okvirni načrt, naloga Skupnosti „Izboljšanje regionalne gospodarske strukture“, N 123/97 (SG(97) D/7104, 18.8.1997 in SG(98) D/7191, 18.8.1998).
See footnote 14.
Glej opombo 14.
Point 7.5 of the 1999 guidelines states that ‘the Commission will examine the compatibility with the common market of any rescuing and restructuring aid granted without its authorisation (…) on the basis of the Guidelines in force at the time the aid is granted (…)’ ( OJ C 288, 9.10.1999, p. 2).
V odstavku 7.5 Smernic iz leta 1999 piše, „da bo Komisija pri vseh pomočeh za reševanje in prestrukturiranje, ki se jih dodeli brez dovoljenja Komisije (…), na osnovi Smernic, ki so veljale v času dodelitve pomoči, preverila, ali so združljive s skupnim trgom“ ( UL C 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2).
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 14 January 1997 in Case C-169/95 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [1997] ECR I-135, and Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 August 2003 in Joined Cases T-116/01 and T-118/01 P & O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA v and Diputación Foral de Vizcaya v Commission of the European Communities [2003] ECR II-2957.
Sodba Sodišča Evropskih Skupnosti z dne 14. januarja 1997 v Zadevi C-169/95 Španija/Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, PSES 1997, str. I-135 in Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 5. avgusta 2003 v povezanih zadevah T-116/01 in T-118/01 P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya), SA in Diputación Foral de Vizcaya/Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, PSES 2003, str. II-2957.
Joined Cases T-116/01 and T-118/01, (already cited, recital 209).
Povezani zadevi T-116/01 in T-118/01 (že navedeni, uvodna izjava 209).
The Commission asked for additional information by letters dated 14 May 1997, 22 July 1997 and 4 November 1997. Germany replied by letters dated 10 July, registered on the same day, and 2 September, registered on the same day.
Komisija je v dopisih z dne 14. maja 1997, 22. julija 1997 in 4. novembra 1997 zaprosila za dodatne informacije, ki jih je Nemčija posredovala z dopisoma z dne 10. julija 1997 in 2. septembra 1997, evidentiranima istega dne.
Measure 7 (including Measure 7a): A guarantee/loan from the BvS of EUR 644228. The aid element of the guarantee is calculated as the difference between the reference interest rate plus 400 basis points and the interest rate at which the guaranteed loan was provided.
Ukrep 7 (vključno s 7a): Poroštvo/posojilo zavoda BvS v višini 644228 EUR. Element pomoči poroštva se izračuna kot razlika med referenčno obrestno mero z dodatkom 400 odstotnih točk in obrestno mero, po kateri je bilo dano s poroštvom zavarovano posojilo.
For its assessment of rescue and restructuring aid, the Commission issued the Community guidelines [22], which are applicable in this case [23]. The conditions for the application of the Community guidelines are examined below.
Za ocenjevanje pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje je Komisija izdala Smernice Skupnosti (1994) [22], ki se uporabljajo v tem primeru [23], V nadaljevanju Komisija preverja pogoje za uporabo Smernic Skupnosti (1994).
First, the restructuring of CWP cannot be divided into two divisions (phosphates and phosphoric acid).
Prvič prestrukturiranja podjetja CWP ne moremo razdeliti v dve poslovni področji (fosfati in fosforna kislina).
CWP was a firm which was in difficulty and for which a restructuring strategy was drawn up.
Šlo je za podjetje, ki se je znašlo v težavah in za katerega je bila zasnovana strategija za prestrukturiranje.
A further agreement was reached at the end of 1996/beginning of 1997 between the company and the BvS in order to avoid the insolvency of CWP. It provided for a series of measures by the public authorities which constituted the core of the 1997 notification.
Podjetje in BvS sta sklenila dodatni dogovor konec leta 1996/začetek leta 1997, da bi preprečila insolvenco podjetja CWP.
Firstly, the Commission could not determine the exact amount of aid involved overall. Secondly, a preliminary assessment under the 1994 Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (Community guidelines) [15] raised serious doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the common market.
Vendar je bila Komisija v resnih dvomih glede združljivosti pomoči s skupnim trgom.
According to the figures submitted by Germany in 1997, the costs of the restructuring should amount to EUR 12,88 million (see Table 4). In its response to the initiation of the investigation procedure, Germany indicated that the overall costs of the restructuring totalled EUR 18,87 million (see Table 5).
Po navedbah Nemčije iz leta 1997 bi morali skupni stroški prestrukturiranja, kot je razvidno iz preglednice 4, znašati 12,88 milijona EUR. V svojem odgovoru na uvedbo uradnega preiskovalnega postopka je Nemčija navedla, da skupni stroški prestrukturiranja znašajo 18,87 milijona EUR, kar je razvidno iz preglednice 5.
amending Decision 97/569/EC as regards the inclusion of one establishment in South Africa in provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States authorise imports of meat products
o spremembi Odločbe 97/569/ES glede vključitve obrata v Južni Afriki na začasne sezname obratov v tretjih državah, iz katerih države članice dovolijo uvoz mesnih izdelkov
(notified under document number C(2005) 4283)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4283)
Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs [1], and in particular Article 2(1) and (4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 95/408/ES z dne 22. junija 1995 o pogojih za sestavo začasnih seznamov obratov tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice lahko uvažajo nekatere proizvode živalskega izvora, ribiške proizvode ali žive školjke [1], in zlasti člena 2(1) in (4) Odločbe,
Provisional list of establishments in third countries from which the Member States authorise imports of meat products have been drawn up by Commission Decision 97/569/EC [2].
Začasni seznami obratov tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice dovoljujejo uvoz mesnih izdelkov, so bili sestavljeni z Odločbo Komisije 97/569/ES [2].
South Africa has provided the name of one establishment producing meat products for which the responsible authorities certify that the establishment complies with Community rules.
Južna Afrika je predložila ime enega obrata, ki proizvaja mesne izdelke, za katerega odgovorni organi potrjujejo, da ustreza predpisom Skupnosti.
Accordingly, that establishment should be included in the lists drawn up by Decision 97/569/EC.
V skladu s tem je treba navedeni obrat vključiti v sezname, sestavljene z Odločbo 97/569/ES.
As on-the-spot inspections of the concerned establishment have not yet been carried out, imports from it should not be eligible for reduced physical checks pursuant to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [3].
Ker pregledi zadevnega obrata na kraju samem še niso bili izvedeni, za uvoz iz tega obrata ne velja zmanjšana pogostnost fizičnih pregledov v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [3].
Decision 97/569/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 97/569/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Decision 97/569/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 97/569/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
This Decision shall apply from 15 November 2005.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 15. novembra 2005.
Done at Brussels, 11 November 2005.
V Bruslju, 11. novembra 2005
Decision as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33; corrected version in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33; popravljena različica v UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
OJ L 234, 26.8.1997, p. 16.
UL L 234, 26.8.1997, str. 16.
The following text is inserted in Annex I in the part concerning South Africa in accordance with the national reference:
V delu Priloge I, ki se nanaša na Južno Afriko, se vstavi naslednje besedilo skladno z nacionalno referenco:
FMP Farmed game meat products
MGD Izdelki iz mesa gojene divjadi.
1 Ratite meat products only.’
1 Samo mesni proizvodi ratitov.“
FMP, 1
MGD, 1
concerning the non-inclusion of naled in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance
o nevključitvi naleda v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o preklicu registracij fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo navedeno snov
(notified under document number C(2005) 4351)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4351)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1], in zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 8(2) Direktive,
Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I of that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS določa, da lahko država članica v 12 letih od uradnega obvestila navedene direktive registrira za dajanje v promet fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, ki niso uvrščene v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, in so že v prometu dve leti po datumu uradnega obvestila, medtem ko se te snovi postopno preučujejo v okviru delovnega programa.
Commission Regulations (EC) No 451/2000 [2] and (EC) No 703/2001 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [2] in (ES) št. 703/2001 [3] določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
For the active substance naled, the notifier informed the Commission on 2 December 2004 that it no longer wished to seek the inclusion of that substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Za aktivno snov naled je prijavitelj 2. decembra 2004 obvestil Komisijo, da ne želi več vključitve te snovi v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Consequently, that active substance should not be included in that Annex and Member States should withdraw all authorisations for plant protection products containing naled.
Zato naj se navedena aktivna snov ne vključi v navedeno prilogo in države članice morajo preklicati vse registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo naled.
A period of grace for disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks should be provided to allow those stocks to be used in one further growing season.
Odobriti je treba prehodni rok za odstranitev, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog, da se omogoči uporaba teh zalog še v enem nadaljnjem rastnem obdobju.
Naled shall not be included as an active substance in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Naled se ne vključi kot aktivna snov v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
authorisations for plant protection products containing naled are withdrawn by 11 May 2006;
se registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo naled, prekličejo do 11. maja 2006;
no authorisations for plant protection products containing naled are granted or renewed from 12 November 2005.
se od 12. novembra 2005 ne odobri ali podaljša registracije fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo naled.
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, for the disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks shall be as short as possible and shall expire on 11 May 2007 at the latest.
Kakršen koli prehodni rok, ki ga odobrijo države članice v skladu s členom 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS za odstranitev, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog, mora biti čim krajši in poteče najkasneje 11. maja 2007.
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 1).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 396/2005 (UL L 70, 16.3.2005, str. 1).
on a Community financial contribution for 2005 to cover expenditure incurred by Belgium, France and the Netherlands for the purpose of combating organisms harmful to plants or plant products
o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za leto 2005 za kritje izdatkov, ki so nastali v Belgiji, Franciji in na Nizozemskem, za boj proti organizmom, škodljivim za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode
(notified under document number C(2005) 4356)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4356)
Having regard to Council Directive 2000/29/EC of 8 May 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the Community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the Community [1], and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2000/29/ES z dne 8. maja 2000 o varstvenih ukrepih proti vnosu organizmov, škodljivih za rastline ali rastlinske proizvode, v Skupnost in proti njihovemu širjenju v Skupnosti [1], in zlasti člena 23 Direktive,
Pursuant to Directive 2000/29/EC, a financial contribution from the Community may be granted to Member States to cover expenditure relating directly to the necessary measures which have been taken or are planned to be taken for the purpose of combating harmful organisms introduced from third countries or from other areas in the Community, in order to eradicate or, if that is not possible, to contain them.
V skladu z Direktivo 2000/29/ES je finančni prispevek Skupnosti lahko dodeljen državam članicam za kritje izdatkov, ki se neposredno nanašajo na potrebne ukrepe, sprejete ali načrtovane za boj proti škodljivim organizmom, vnesenim iz tretjih držav ali drugih območij v Skupnosti, za izkoreninjenje, ali če to ni mogoče, preprečevanje njihovega širjenja.
Belgium, France and the Netherlands have each established a programme of actions to eradicate organisms harmful to plants introduced in their territories.
Belgija, Francija in Nizozemska so uvedle program ukrepov za izkoreninjenje organizmov, škodljivih za rastline, ki so bili vneseni na njihovo ozemlje.
These programmes specify the objectives to be achieved, the measures carried out, their duration and their cost.
Navedeni programi določajo, katere cilje je treba doseči in katere ukrepe je treba izpeljati, njihovo trajanje in stroške.