natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Greece is granted derogations for the production of results relating to Section 8 (1.1), Items 1 (agriculture, hunting and forestry), 2 (fisheries) and 16 (services activities) of Annex I and those relating to Section 8(2) of Annex II;
Grčiji se odobri odstopanja pri pripravi rezultatov iz oddelka 8(1.1), postavke 1 (kmetijstvo, lov in gozdarstvo), 2 (ribištvo in ribiške storitve) in 16 (storitvene dejavnosti) Priloge I ter rezultatov iz oddelka 8(2) Priloge II.
Cyprus is granted derogations for the production of results relating to Section 8 (1.1), Items 1 (agriculture, hunting and forestry), 2 (fisheries) and 16 (services activities) of Annex I and those relating to Section 8(2) of Annex II.
Cipru se odobri odstopanja pri pripravi rezultatov iz oddelka 8(1.1), postavke 1 (kmetijstvo, lov in gozdarstvo), 2 (ribištvo in ribiške storitve) in 16 (storitvene dejavnosti) Priloge I ter rezultatov iz oddelka 8(2) Priloge II.
The derogations provided for in paragraph 1 are granted only in respect of data for the first reference year, namely 2004.
Odstopanja, predvidena v odstavku 1, se odobrijo samo za podatke za prvo referenčno leto, in sicer leto 2004.
After expiry of that period, Belgium, Portugal, Greece and Cyprus shall transmit data from the 2006 reference year.
Po preteku tega obdobja posredujejo Belgija, Portugalska, Grčija in Ciper podatke iz referenčnega leta 2006.
OJ L 332, 9.12.2002, p. 1.
UL L 332, 9.12.2002, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 574/2004 (OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 15).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 574/2004 (UL L 90, 27.3.2004, str. 15).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1830/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1830/2004
amending Regulation (EC) No 283/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 284/2004 as regards registration of certain imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film produced by one Brazilian exporting producer and produced by one Israeli exporting producer
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 283/2004 in Uredbe (ES) št. 284/2004 glede registracije nekaterih uvozov polietilenskega tereftalatnega (PET) filma, ki ga proizvaja en brazilski proizvajalec izvoznik ter ki ga proizvaja en izraelski proizvajalec izvoznik
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic anti-dumping Regulation) and in particular Articles 13 and 14(5) thereof and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [2] (the basic anti-subsidy Regulation), and in particular Articles 23 and 24(5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti pred dampinškim uvozom iz držav nečlanic Evropske skupnosti [1] („temeljna protidampinška uredba“), zlasti členov 13 in 14(5), ter ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti pred subvencioniranim uvozom iz držav nečlanic Evropske skupnosti [2] („temeljna protisubvencijska uredba“), zlasti členov 23 in 24(5) Uredbe,
By Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [3] (the definitive anti-subsidy Regulation), the Council imposed countervailing duties ranging between 3,8 % and 19,1 % on imports of polyethylene terephthalate film (PET film) originating in India.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [3] ( „dokončna protisubvencijska uredba“) je Svet naložil izravnalne dajatve v višini od 3,8 % do 19,1 % na uvoz polietilenskega teraftalatnega (PET) filma („PET film“) s poreklom iz Indije.
By Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [4] (the definitive anti-dumping Regulation), the Council imposed anti-dumping duties ranging between 0 % and 62,6 % on imports of PET film originating in India.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [4] („dokončna protidampinška uredba“) je Svet naložil protidampinške carine v višini od 0 % do 62,6 % na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije.
On 6 January 2004, the Commission received a request, pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and to Article 23(2) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, from DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH and Nuroll SpA to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures imposed on imports of PET film originating in India.
Dne 6. januarja 2004 je Komisija od družb DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH in Nuroll SpA prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) temeljne protidampinške uredbe in s členom 23(2) temeljne protisubvencijske uredbe, da razišče domnevno izogibanje protidampinškim in izravnalnim ukrepom, naloženim za uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije.
According to the request, the circumvention practice consisted of transhipment of PET film originating in India via Brazil and via Israel to the Community.
V skladu s tem zahtevkom se je izogibanje dejansko dogajalo s pretovarjanjem PET filma s poreklom iz Indije preko Brazilije in Izraela v Skupnost.
The request contained sufficient prima facie evidence regarding the factors set out in Article 13(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 23(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation.
Vloga je vsebovala dovolj z verjetnostjo izkazanih dokazov za dejavnike, navedene v členu 13(1) temeljne protidampinške uredbe in členu 23(1) temeljne protisubvencijske uredbe.
The Commission initiated investigations into the alleged circumvention of countervailing measures by Regulation (EC) No 283/2004 [5] and of anti-dumping measures by Regulation (EC) No 284/2004 [6] (the initiating Regulations).
Komisija je uvedla preiskavo o domnevnem izogibanju izravnalnim ukrepom z Uredbo (ES) št. 283/2004 [5] ter protidampinškim ukrepom z Uredbo (ES) št. 284/2004 [6] („začetni uredbi“).
Pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Articles 23(2) and 24(5) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, Article 2 of the initiating Regulations instructed the customs authorities to register imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not, as of 20 February 2004.
V skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) temeljne protidampinške uredbe in členoma 23(2) in 24(5) temeljne protisubvencijske uredbe je člen 2 začetnih uredb napotil carinske organe, da z dnem 20. februarja 2004 registrirajo uvoz PET filma, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je njegovo deklarirano poreklo iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne.
Article 2(3) of the initiating Regulations provided that the Commission, by Regulation, may direct customs authorities to cease registration in respect of imports into the Community of products manufactured by producers having applied for an exemption of registration and having been found not to be circumventing the anti-dumping duties and the countervailing duties respectively.
Člen 2(3) začetnih uredb določa, da lahko Komisija z uredbo napoti carinske organe k registriranju v Skupnost uvoženih izdelkov, katerih proizvajalci so vložili prošnjo za izvzetje iz registracije in za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da se ne izogibajo protidampinškim carinam ali izravnalnim dajatvam.
REQUESTS FOR EXEMPTION
PROŠNJE ZA IZVZETJE
Within the deadline laid down in Article 3 of the initiating Regulations, the Commission received requests for exemption from the registration and measures from one exporting producer in Brazil, Terphane Ltda, BR 101, km 101, City of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, State of Pernambuco, Brazil
V roku, določenem v členu 3 začetnih uredb, je Komisija prejela prošnjo za izvzetje iz registracije in ukrepov od enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz Brazilije, Terphane Ltda, BR 101, km 101, mesto Cabo de Santo Agostinho, država Pernambuco, Brazilija
(Terphane) and from one exporting producer in Israel, Jolybar Filmtechnic Converting Ltd (1987), Hacharutsim str.
(„Terphane“), ter od enega proizvajalca izvoznika iz Izraela, Jolybar Filmtechnic Converting Ltd (1987), Hacharutsim str. 7, Ind.
7, Ind. Park Siim 2000, Natania South, 42504. POB 8380, Israel
Park Siim 2000, Natania South, 42504, POB 8380, Israel
INVESTIGATION PERIOD
PREISKOVALNO OBDOBJE
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 (the IP).
Preiskovalno obdobje je pokrivalo obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2003 („PO“).
Data was collected from 1998 up to the IP to investigate any changes in the pattern of trade.
Zbiranje podatkov je potekalo od leta 1998 do konca PO, da bi se raziskale spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja.
FINDINGS IN RESPECT OF TERPHANE
UGOTOVITVE V ZVEZI Z DRUŽBO TERPHANE
Terphane replied to the questionnaires sent by the Commission in the course of the investigation.
Terphane je odgovoril na vprašalnik, ki ga je v teku preiskave poslala Skupnost.
The Commission carried out a verification visit at the premises of Terphane.
Komisija je opravila preveritveni obisk prostorov družbe Terphane.
Terphane only exported 10,6 tonnes of PET film to the Community during the IP.
Terphane je med PO izvozil le 10,6 tone PET filma v Skupnost.
The only export by the company prior to the one during the IP was for a small sample quantity which took place in 2002.
Družba je pred izvozom v času PO izvozila majhno količino vzorcev leta 2002.
No other exports to the Community were made by the company during the IP or in the period for which data were collected.
Niti med PO niti v obdobju pridobivanja podatkov družba ni izvršila nobenega drugega izvoza v Skupnost.
Moreover, it has also been established that Terphane is a manufacturer and exporter of PET film, operating its own production facilities for the complete production process of the product concerned.
Nadalje je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Terphane proizvajalec in izvoznik PET filma, ki ves proizvodni postopek zadevnega izdelka izvede v svojih lastnih proizvodnih obratih.
The film supplied to the Community is manufactured by the company in facilities established before the entry into force of the measures on Indian PET film.
Film, dobavljen v Skupnost, družba proizvaja v obratih, ustanovljenih pred začetkom veljavnosti ukrepov na indijski PET film.
The company has never purchased any PET film from India either during or prior to the IP.
Družba ni nikoli kupila nikakršnega PET filma iz Indije niti pred niti med PO.
It is therefore considered that Terphane demonstrated that it did not circumvent the measures imposed on PET film originating in India.
Zato se šteje, da je družba Terphane izkazala, da se ni izogibala ukrepom, naloženim za PET film s poreklom iz Indije.
FINDINGS IN RESPECT OF JOLYBAR
UGOTOVITVE V ZVEZI Z DRUŽBO JOLYBAR
Jolybar replied to the questionnaire sent by the Commission in the course of the investigation.
Jolybar je odgovoril na vprašalnik, ki ga je v teku preiskave poslala Skupnost.
The Commission carried out a verification visit at the premises of Jolybar.
Komisija je opravila preveritveni obisk prostorov družbe Jolybar.
The sole cooperating company in Israel, Jolybar slits, sheets and converts purchased PET film and sells it as products which fall under the same CN codes as the product concerned but are generally not of Indian origin and therefore cannot be considered to be the product concerned.
Edina sodelujoča družba v Izraelu, Jolybar, razrezuje, valja in preoblikuje PET film ter ga prodaja kot izdelek, ki je zajet pod isto oznako KN kot zadevni izdelek, vendar pa v glavnem ni indijskega porekla in torej ga ni mogoče šteti za zadevni izdelek.
The company has been supplying PET film to the Community since the 1990s.
Družba Jolybar dobavlja PET film v Skupnost od 90-ih.
The film supplied to the Community is manufactured by Jolybar in facilities established before the entry into force of the measures on Indian PET film.
Družba Jolybar proizvaja film, ki ga dobavlja v Skupnost, v obratih, ustanovljenih pred začetkom veljavnosti ukrepov na indijski PET film.
The quantities of PET film exported by Jolybar to the Community doubled from 1999 to 2003 (the IP).
Količine PET filma, ki jih Jolybar izvaža v Skupnost, so se od 1999 do 2003 (PO) podvojile.
The company explained that as a general rule it does not supply Indian film to Community customers since the latter prefer the qualities of European film as a base material for treatment by Jolybar.
Družba je pojasnila, da praviloma ne dobavlja indijskega filma strankam v Skupnosti, saj se slednje raje odločajo za kakovosti evropskega filma, osnove, ki jo Jolybar obdeluje.
Exceptionally, during the IP, a quantity of approximately 1 tonne of Indian film was shipped to one Community customer as part of a larger consignment which the customer urgently required.
Izjemoma je bila v PO poslana stranki v Skupnosti količina približno ene tone indijskega filma kot del večje pošiljke, ki jo je stranka nujno potrebovala.
It is therefore concluded that there is sufficient economic justification for the change in the pattern of trade established for Jolybar, which is in line with its activities in the Community market in respect of PET film manufactured by them.
Zato se sklepa, da obstaja zadostna ekonomska upravičenost za spremembo vzorca trgovanja, ugotovljenega za družbo Jolybar. Ta je usklajen z dejavnostmi družbe na tržišču Skupnosti, povezanimi s filmom, ki ga sama proizvaja.
In the light of the above findings, registration of imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and produced by Terphane and consigned from Israel and produced by Jolybar should cease.
Glede na zgoraj navedene ugotovitve se registracija uvoza PET filma, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in ga proizvaja družba Terphane, ter filma, ki se pošilja iz Izraela in ga proizvaja Jolybar, ustavi.
Any decision at this stage concerning exporters should be limited to exemption from registration.
Vse odločitve na tej stopnji o izvoznikih so omejene na izvzetje iz registracije.
If the Council subsequently adopts Regulations extending the anti-dumping measures pursuant to Article 13 of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and Article 23 of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation, it may also decide to exempt certain exporters from such extended measures.
Če Svet naknadno sprejme uredbe, ki razširjajo protidampinške ukrepe v skladu s členom 13 temeljne protidampinške uredbe ter člena 23 temeljne protisubvencijske uredbe, se lahko prav tako odloči, da nekatere izvoznike izvzame iz takih ukrepov.
The Commission therefore considers it appropriate to amend its initiating Regulations insofar as they provided for the registration of imports of PET film consigned from Brazil (whether declared as originating in Brazil or not) and for the registration of imports of PET film consigned from Israel (whether declared as originating in Israel or not).
Zato Komisija meni, da je ustrezno spremeniti začetni uredbi, kolikor se nanašata na registracijo uvoza PET filma, poslanega iz Brazilije (ne glede na to, ali je njegovo deklarirano poreklo iz Brazilije ali ne), ter na registracijo PET filma, poslanega iz Izraela (ne glede na to, ali je njegovo deklarirano poreklo iz Izraela ali ne).
This Regulation is based on findings specific to Terphane and Jolybar and does not prejudge any decision which the Council may take to extend the existing anti-dumping and countervailing measures on PET film originating in India to the same product consigned from Brazil (whether declared as originating in Brazil or not) and consigned from Israel (whether declared as originating in Israel or not),
Ta uredba temelji na ugotovitvah, specifičnih za družbi Terphane in Jolybar, ter ne posega v nobeno morebitno odločitev Sveta glede razširitve protidampinških in izravnalnih ukrepov na PET film s poreklom iz Indije na enak izdelek, poslan iz Brazilije (ne glede na to, ali je njegovo deklarirano poreklo iz Brazilije ali ne) in poslan iz Izraela (ne glede na to, ali je njegovo deklarirano poreklo iz Izraela ali ne) –
The following paragraph shall be added to Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 283/2004:
Naslednji odstavek se doda členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 283/2004:
‘Notwithstanding paragraph 1, imports of the product identified in Article 1 which are produced by the following companies shall not be subject to registration:
„Ne glede na odstavek 1 se uvoz izdelka, identificiranega v členu 1, ki ga proizvajata družbi v nadaljevanju, ne registrira:
Terphane Ltda, BR 101, km 101, City of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, State of Pernambuco, Brazil
Terphane Ltda, BR 101, km 101, mesto Cabo de Santo Agostinho, država Pernambuco, Brazilija
The following paragraph shall be added to Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 284/2004:
Naslednji odstavek se doda členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 284/2004:
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 461/2004.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 461/2004.
OJ L 316, 10.12.1999, p. 1.
UL L 316, 10.12.1999, str. 1.
OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 1.
UL L 227, 23.8.2001, str. 1.
OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 25.
UL L 49, 19.2.2004, str. 25.
OJ L 49, 19.2.2004, p. 28.
UL L 49, 19.2.2004, str. 28.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1831/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1831/2004
amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 930/2000 establishing implementing rules as to the suitability of the denomination of varieties of agricultural plant species and vegetable species
o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 930/2000 o oblikovanju izvedbenih pravil glede primernosti poimenovanja sort poljščin in zelenjadnic
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species [1], and in particular Article 9(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/53/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnem katalogu sort poljščin [1] in zlasti člena 9(6) Direktive,
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed [2], and in particular Article 9(6) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/55/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena zelenjadnic [2] in zlasti člena 9(6) Direktive,
Directives 2002/53/EC and 2002/55/EC lay down general rules in relation to the suitability of variety denominations, by means of a reference to Article 63 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights [3].
Direktivi 2002/53/ES in 2002/55/ES določata splošna pravila v zvezi s primernostjo imen sort s sklicevanjem na člen 63 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2100/94 z dne 27. julija 1994 o žlahtniteljskih pravicah v Skupnosti [3].
Commission Regulation (EC) No 930/2000 [4] established detailed rules for the application of certain criteria set out by Article 63 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94, in particular in respect of the impediments to the designation of a variety denomination.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 930/2000 [4] je določila podrobna navodila za uporabo nekaterih meril, ki jih določa člen 63 Uredbe (ES) št. 2100/94, zlasti glede ovir pri oznakah za ime sorte.
Due to developments in the area of protection of geographical indications and designation of origin for agriculture products, as laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 [5], and to changes in the proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office as laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 [6], the detailed rules established by Regulation (EC) No 930/2000 should be updated accordingly.
Zaradi razvoja na področju varstva geografskih oznak in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode, kakor jih določa Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 [5], in sprememb postopkov pred Uradom Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte, kakor jih določa Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1239/95 [6], je treba ustrezno posodobiti podrobna navodila, kakor jih določa Uredba (ES) št. 930/2000.
Regulation (EC) No 930/2000 should therefore be amended.
Uredbo (ES) št. 930/2000 je zato treba spremeniti.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za semena in semenski material za kmetijstvo, hortikulturo in gozdarstvo –
Regulation (EC) No 930/2000 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 930/2000 se spremeni:
In Article 2, the following paragraphs are inserted:
V členu 2 se vstavijo naslednji odstavki:
In the case of a geographical indication or a designation of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs as a prior right of a third party, a variety denomination in the territory of the Community shall be considered to be precluded where the variety denomination would breach Article 13 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 with respect to the geographical indication or the designation of origin protected in a Member State or in the Community under Articles 5(5), 6 or the former Article 17 of that Regulation for goods which are identical or comparable to the plant variety concerned.
V primeru da je geografska oznaka ali označba porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila prednostna pravica tretje stranke, se šteje, da se ime sorte na ozemlju Skupnosti onemogoči, kadar bi ime sorte kršilo člen 13 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/92 glede geografskih oznak ali označb porekla, varovanih v državi članici ali Skupnosti s členoma 5(5) in 6 ali prejšnjim členom 17 te uredbe za blago, ki je enako ali primerljivo z zadevno sorto rastlin.
An impediment to the suitability of a denomination due to a prior right referred to in paragraph 2 may be removed where a written consent of the holder of the prior right to the use of the denomination in relation to the variety has been obtained, provided that such a consent is not liable to mislead the public as to the true origin of the product.
Zadržek do primernosti imena zaradi prednostne pravice iz odstavka 2 se lahko odpravi, kadar je pridobljeno pisno soglasje imetnika prednostne pravice za uporabo imena za sorto pod pogojem, da za takšno soglasje ni verjetno, da bi zavajalo javnost glede dejanskega porekla proizvoda.
In Article 2, point 2 becomes point 4.
V členu 2 točka 2 postane točka 4.
Point (a) is replaced by the following:
točka (a) se nadomesti z naslednjo:
where it is in the form of a “fancy name”:
kadar gre za ‚domišljijsko ime’:
it consists of a single letter,
sestoji iz ene same črke;
it consists of, or contains as a separate element, a series of letters not forming a word pronounceable in an official language of the Community; however, where this series is an established abbreviation, such an established abbreviation shall be limited to a maximum of two sets of up to three characters each, located at each end of the denomination,
sestoji ali vsebuje kot ločen sestavni del niz črk, ki ne tvorijo izgovorljive besede v uradnem jeziku Skupnosti; pa vendar, kadar je ta niz uveljavljena kratica, mora biti ta uveljavljena kratica omejena na največ dva niza do treh znakov, ki sta nameščena na vsakem koncu imena;
it contains a number, except where this is an integral part of the name, or where this indicates that the variety is or will be one of a numbered series of varieties related through their breeding history,
vsebuje številko, razen kadar je ta sestavni del imena ali kadar ta označuje, da sorta je ali bo ena od oštevilčenih serij sort, ki jih povezuje zgodovina gojenja;
it consists of more than three words or elements, unless the flow of the wording makes it easily recognizable or reproducible,
sestoji iz več kot treh besed ali sestavnih delov, razen če ni v toku besedila zlahka prepoznan ali ponovljiv;
it consists of or contains an excessively long word or element,
sestoji iz pretirano dolge besede ali sestavnega dela ali pa vsebuje pretirano dolgo besedo ali sestavni del;
it contains a punctuation mark or other symbol, an upper and lower case mixture (save where the first letter is in upper case and the rest of the denomination in lower case), subscript, superscript or a design.’
vsebuje ločilo ali drug simbol, mešane velike in male črke (razen kadar je prva črka velika, ostale črke imena pa majhne), pripis spodaj, pripis zgoraj ali risbo;“
In point (b), point (v) is replaced by the following:
v točki (b) se točka (v) nadomesti z naslednjo:
it contains a punctuation mark or other symbol, subscript, superscript or a design.’
vsebuje ločilo ali drug simbol, pripis spodaj, pripis zgoraj ali risbo.“
In Article 4, point (a) is replaced by the following:
V členu 4 se točka (a) nadomesti z naslednjo: