natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Commission has not yet drawn up any specific criteria for assessing aid measures that are specifically tailored to those objectives, even though such measures are frequently promoted within the context of Community regional policy through the European Regional Development Fund.
Vendar Komisija še ni izdelala posebnih meril za presojo ukrepov pomoči, posebej namenjenih tem ciljem, četudi takšne ukrepe pogosto v okviru regionalne politike Skupnosti podpira Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj.
In this context, the Commission also refers to its Communication to the Spring European Council ‘Working together for growth and jobs’ [9], which stresses the importance of promoting innovation and innovation clusters.
V tej zvezi Komisija opozarja tudi na svoje sporočilo za spomladansko zasedanje Evropskega sveta „Sodelovanje za rast in zaposlovanje“ [9], ki poudarja pomembnost stimulacije inovacij in inovacijskih polov (skupin).
The target group for the measure under examination comprises innovative and technology oriented SMEs in their start-up phase, these also being the most important target group for fostering economic growth and employment.
Ciljna skupina zadevnega ukrepa je omejena na inovativna in tehnološko usmerjena MSP na začetni stopnji; ta so hkrati najpomembnejša ciljna skupina za pospeševanje gospodarske rasti in zaposlovanja.
With regard to consultancy services, it should be pointed out that Germany has undertaken not to grant any aid exceeding 50 of eligible costs.
Glede svetovanja je treba poudariti, da se je Nemčija zavezala, da ne bo dodelila nobene pomoči, ki bi presegala 50 % upravičenih stroškov.
The aid for consultancy services is, therefore, in line with Regulation (EC) No 70/2001, and in particular Article 5.
Tako je pomoč za storitve svetovanja v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 70/2001 in zlasti s členom 5 Uredbe.
Accordingly, the measure should be assessed favourably by the Commission.
Temu primerno naj bi Komisija ukrep ocenila ugodno.
Following the amendments made by Germany during the formal investigation procedure, the Commission comes to the following conclusion:
Na podlagi sprememb, ki jih je med uradnim preiskovalnim postopkom izvedla Nemčija, Komisija prihaja do naslednjega zaključka:
As regards the aid granted under the scheme to certain SMEs for renting premises and using laboratories, specialised equipment and/or other facilities, the Commission notes the commitment by Germany to comply with Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 as regards the scheme under examination.
Kar zadeva pomoč, dodeljeno v okviru programa pomoči, določenim MSP za najem prostorov, uporabo laboratorijev ali posebne opreme in/ali drugih predmetov opreme, Komisija upošteva obljubo Nemčije, da bo v okviru zadevnega programa upoštevala Uredbo (ES) št. 69/2001.
Insofar as aid for the SME consultancy services available in the centres is granted to SMEs under the aid scheme, Germany undertook to make such grants in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 70/2001, and in particular Article 5,
V kolikor so v okviru programa pomoči MSP dodeljene pomoči za „storitve svetovanja MSP“ v centrih, se je Nemčija zavezala, da bo takšne subvencije dodeljevala v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 70/2001 in zlasti s členom 5 –
The aid scheme which Germany intends to implement in the period 2004 to 2006 for the development of municipal infrastructure directly serving industry in accordance with Part II, point 7 of the Outline Plan for the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for ‘Improving regional economic structures’ for the construction or extension of business, technology and incubator centres that provide accommodation and services for small and medium-sized enterprises does not constitute State aid caught by Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty insofar as Germany abides by its undertaking to comply with Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 for the rental of premises, laboratories, specialised equipment and/or other facilities.
Program pomoči, ki ga Nemčija namerava izpeljati v obdobju med letoma 2004 in 2006 za razvoj občinske gospodarske infrastrukture v skladu s točko 7 dela II Okvirnega načrta skupne naloge zvezne vlade in dežel „Izboljšanje regionalnih gospodarskih struktur“ za izgradnjo ali razširitev poslovnih, tehnoloških in ustanovnih centrov, ki malim in srednjim podjetjem nudijo prostore in storitve, ne predstavlja državne pomoči iz člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, v kolikor bo Nemčija držala obljubo in upoštevala Uredbo (ES) št. 69/2001 za najem prostorov, laboratorijev, posebne opreme in/ali drugih storitev.
The aid scheme referred to in paragraph 1 constitutes State aid that is compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty insofar as Germany abides by its undertaking to grant any aid for consultancy services to small and medium-sized enterprises that avail themselves of the services available at business, technology and incubator centres in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 70/2001.
Program pomoči, naveden v odstavku 1, predstavlja državno pomoč, združljivo s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES, v kolikor Nemčija drži obljubo, da bo vsako pomoč za storitve svetovanja v korist malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki se poslužujejo storitev poslovnih, tehnoloških in ustanovnih centrov, dodelila v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 70/2001.
OJ C 84, 3.4.2004, p. 2.
UL C 84, 3.4.2004, str. 2.
See footnote 2.
Glej sprotno opombo 2.
OJ L 159, 3.6.1998, p. 58.
UL L 159, 3.6.1998, str. 58.
Judgment of the Court of 16 June 1987 Case 118/85 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. junija 1987, zadeva 118/85 Komisija Evropskih skupnosti/Italijanska republika, ZOdl. 1987, str. 2599, odstavka 7 in 8.
COM(2005) 24 final.
COM(2005) 24 konč.
By letter of 2 November 2004, registered as received on 3 November 2004, the Commission received comments from ADT — Bundesverband deutscher Innovations-, Technologie- und Gründerzentren e.V. (hereinafter ‘ADT’), an association of German innovation, technology and incubator centres.
S pismom z dne 2. novembra 2004, evidentiranim 3. novembra 2004, je Komisija prejela pripombe ADT – Zveze nemških inovacijskih, tehnoloških in ustanovnih centrov (Bundesverband deutscher Innovations-, Technologie- und Gründerzentren e.V., v nadaljevanju „ADT“).
But, even though they may carry out a range of public tasks and exercise public powers, they can, according to the ruling given by the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 16 June 1987, in Case 118/85 (Commission v Italy) [7], be regarded as undertakings if they carry out an economic activity on the market.
Toda čeprav opravljajo vrsto javnih nalog in so javna izvršna oblast, jih je po pojmovanju Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v sodbi z dne 16. junija 1987, zadeva 118/85 (Komisija/Italija) [7] mogoče obravnavati kot podjetja, v kolikor na trgu izvajajo gospodarsko dejavnost.
This is to be assumed to be the case here especially if the municipalities are active via an owner-operated municipal enterprise.
To se v zadevnem primeru domneva predvsem, če so občine dejavne preko občinskega samostojnega podjetja.
The previous lack of transparency of the measure is rectified as Germany has undertaken to calculate the aid elements contained in the rental for the premises rented by the SMEs on the basis of comparable rentals for similar premises, and in particular the official tables setting out commercial rentals (Gewerbemietspiegel). In this way, Germany will ensure that the de minimis ceiling of EUR 100000 over a three-year period will be complied with.
Nekdanja manjkajoča transparentnost ukrepa se je izboljšala, saj se je Nemčija zavezala, da bo elemente pomoči, vključene v najemnini prostorov, najetih s strani MSP, izračunala na osnovi primerljivih najemnin za podobne prostore, predvsem uradnih preglednic s poslovnimi najemninami (Gewerbemietspiegel).
amending Decisions 2001/689/EC, 2002/231/EC and 2002/272/EC in order to prolong the validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to certain products
o spremembi odločb 2001/689/ES, 2002/231/ES in 2002/272/ES zaradi podaljšanja veljavnosti okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje določenim proizvodom
(notified under document number C(2005) 4102)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4102)
The product group definition and the ecological criteria set out in Commission Decision 2001/689/EC of 28 August 2001 establishing ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to dishwashers [2] expire on 28 August 2006.
Opredelitev skupine proizvodov in okoljska merila, določeni v Odločbi Komisije 2001/689/ES z dne 28. avgusta 2001 o določitvi ekoloških meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje pomivalnim strojem [2], prenehajo veljati 28. avgusta 2006.
Commission Decision 2002/231/EC of 18 March 2002 establishing revised ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to footwear and amending Decision 1999/179/EC [3] expires on 31 March 2007.
Odločba Komisije 2002/231/ES z dne 18. marca 2002 o določitvi spremenjenih okoljskih meril za podeljevanje znaka za okolje Skupnosti obutvi in o spremembi Odločbe 1999/179/ES [3] preneha veljati 31. marca 2007.
Commission Decision 2002/272/EC of 25 March 2002 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the Community eco-label to hard floor coverings [4] expires on 31 March 2007.
Odločba Komisije 2002/272/ES z dne 25. marca 2002 o uvedbi okoljskih meril za podelitev znaka Skupnosti za okolje trdim talnim oblogam [4] preneha veljati 31. marca 2007.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 a timely review has been carried out of the ecological criteria, as well as of the related assessment and verification requirements, established by those Decisions.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1980/2000 je bil opravljen redni pregled okoljskih meril in z njimi povezanih zahtev za ocenjevanje in preverjanje, ki so bile določene z zgoraj navedenimi odločbami.
In the light of the review of those criteria and requirements, it is appropriate in all three cases to prolong the period of validity of the ecological criteria and the requirements for a period of one year.
Glede na pregled navedenih meril in zahtev je primerno, da se obdobje veljavnosti okoljskih meril in zahtev v vseh treh primerih podaljša za eno leto.
Since the review obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000 concerns only the ecological criteria and assessment and verification requirements, it is appropriate that Decisions 2002/231/EC and 2002/272/EC remain in effect.
Ker se redni pregled v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1980/2000 nanaša samo na okoljska merila ter zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje, je primerno, da odločbi 2002/231/ES in 2002/272/ES ostaneta v veljavi.
Decisions 2001/689/EC, 2002/231/EC and 2002/272/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Direktive 2001/689/EGS, 2002/231/EGS in 2002/272/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Article 3 of Decision 2001/689/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 3 Odločbe 2001/689/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The ecological criteria for the product group dishwashers, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 28 August 2007.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚pomivalni stroji’ ter s tem povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 28. avgusta 2007.“.
Article 5 of Decision 2002/231/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 5 Odločbe 2002/231/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The ecological criteria for the product group footwear, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 March 2008.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚obutev’ ter s tem povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. marca 2008.“.
Article 4 of Decision 2002/272/EC is replaced by the following:
Člen 4 Odločbe 2002/272/ES se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The ecological criteria for the product group hard floor coverings, as well as the related assessment and verification requirements, shall be valid until 31 March 2008.’
Okoljska merila za skupino proizvodov ‚trde talne obloge’ ter s tem povezane zahteve za ocenjevanje in preverjanje veljajo do 31. marca 2008.“.
OJ L 77, 20.3.2002, p. 50.
UL L 77. 20.3.2002, str. 50.
Council Decision 2005/784/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2005/784/SZVP
of 7 November 2005
z dne 7. novembra 2005
extending and amending Decision 1999/730/CFSP with a view to a European Union contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons in Cambodia
o podaljšanju veljavnosti in spremembi Sklepa 1999/730/SZVP o prispevku Evropske unije k boju proti destabilizirajočemu kopičenju in širjenju osebnega in lahkega orožja v Kambodži
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof, in conjunction with Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2002/589/SZVP z dne 12. julija 2002 o prispevku Evropske unije k boju proti destabilizirajočemu kopičenju in razširjanju orožja malega kalibra in lahkega strelnega orožja [1], in zlasti člena 6 Skupnega ukrepa v povezavi s členom 23(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
On 15 November 1999 the Council adopted Decision 1999/730/CFSP [2] concerning a European Union contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons in Cambodia.
Svet je 15. novembra 1999 sprejel Sklep 1999/730/SZVP [2] o prispevku Evropske unije za boj proti destabilizirajočemu kopičenju in širjenju osebnega in lahkega orožja v Kambodži.
Decision 1999/730/CFSP was last extended and amended by Decision 2004/792/CFSP.
Sklep 1999/730/SZVP je bil nazadnje podaljšan in spremenjen s Sklepom 2004/792/SZVP.
Some final objectives could not be fulfilled by 15 November 2005, the date on which Decision 1999/730/CFSP is due to expire, and others should be consolidated after that date.
Nekaterih končnih ciljev ne bo mogoče doseči do 15. novembra 2005, ko bo Sklep 1999/730/SZVP prenehal veljati, nekatere druge cilje pa je treba po tem datumu utrditi.
Decision 1999/730/CFSP should therefore be extended and amended,
Sklep 1999/730/SZVP je treba zato podaljšati in spremeniti –
Decision 1999/730/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:
Sklep 1999/730/SZVP se spremeni:
in Article 3(1), the financial reference amount ‘EUR 1375565’ shall be replaced by ‘EUR 600000’;
v členu 3(1) se referenčni finančni znesek „1375565 EUR“ nadomesti s „600000 EUR“;
in Article 4 second subparagraph, ‘15 November 2005’ shall be replaced by ‘15 November 2006’;
v drugem odstavku člena 4 se „15. novembra 2005“ nadomesti s „15. novembra 2006“;
Article 5 is hereby deleted;
člen 5 se črta;
the Annex shall be replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga se nadomesti z besedilom Priloge k temu sklepu.
This Decision shall take effect on 16 November 2005.
Ta sklep začne učinkovati 16. novembra 2005.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/901/CFSP (OJ L 379, 24.12.2004, p. 111).
Sklep, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s Sklepom 2004/901/SZVP (UL L 379, 24.12.2004, str. 111).
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE PROJECT MANAGER (2006)
PRISTOJNOSTI IN NALOGE PROJEKTNEGA DIREKTORJA (2006)
The Project Manager, in cooperation with the Cambodian Armed Forces, will continue the work related to record-keeping and the management and security of weapons stocks and to developing policies, guidelines and practices in this area.
Projektni direktor bo v sodelovanju s kamboškimi oboroženimi silami še naprej opravljal dejavnosti v zvezi z evidentiranjem, upravljanjem in varovanjem zalog orožja ter oblikovanjem politik, smernic in praks na tem področju.
To that end, the Project Manager will monitor the projects previously implemented in Military Region 1 (Stung Treng), Military Region 2 (Kampong Cham), Military Region 3 (Kampong Speu), Military Region 4 (Siem Reap), Military Region 5 (Battambang), the Special Military Region (Phnom Penh) and the Royal Gendarmerie.
Projektni direktor bo v ta namen spremljal projekte, ki so se doslej izvajali v vojaški regiji 1 (Stung Treng), vojaški regiji 2 (Kampong Cham), vojaški regiji 3 (Kampong Speu), vojaški regiji 4 (Siem Reap), vojaški regiji 5 (Battambang), posebni vojaški regiji (Pnom Pen) in v Kraljevi žandarmeriji.
In close cooperation with the Ministry of National Defence, he will define and implement a further project on safe storage and registration of weapons of the Air Force and Navy.
V tesnem sodelovanju z ministrstvom za obrambo bo pripravil in izvedel nadaljnji projekt za varno skladiščenje in registracijo orožja zračnih sil in mornarice.
This will include the building of medium- and short-term storage facilities, training of the relevant personnel at all levels and the registration of all weapons in the centralised computer database of the Ministry of Defence.
Projekt bo vključeval izgradnjo objektov za kratkoročno in srednjeročno skladiščenje, usposabljanje zadevnega osebja na vseh ravneh in evidentiranje vsega orožja v osrednji računalniški podatkovni bazi ministrstva za obrambo.
The implemented project is to include assistance, with the support of relevant experts, to the Government’s programme of public ceremonies for the destruction of surplus military weapons and, where appropriate, of collected weapons and of surplus weapons that may still be held by the army and police and security forces.
Izvajani projekt bo ob podpori ustreznih strokovnjakov vključeval pomoč vladnemu programu javnih prireditev za uničevanje odvečnega vojaškega orožja ter, kjer je to primerno, zbranega in odvečnega orožja, s katerim še vedno razpolaga vojska ali policijske in varnostne sile.
When required the Project Manager will continue to advise, and where possible assist, the Government, international organisations and local NGO’s on issues relating to weapons security and to EU ASAC’s current and previous activities.
Projektni direktor bo po potrebi še naprej svetoval in po možnosti pomagal vladi, mednarodnim organizacijam in lokalnim nevladnim organizacijam v zvezi z vprašanji glede varnega ravnanja z orožjem in preteklih ter tekočih dejavnosti EU ASAC.
To this end he will seek full cooperation from the Government of Cambodia and the police and security forces.
V ta namen si bo prizadeval zagotoviti polno sodelovanje kamboške vlade in policijskih ter varnostnih sil.
Following the completion of the project on safe storage and registration of weapons of the Air Force and Navy, the Project Manager will implement the plans drawn up under the Project Manager’s 2005 Terms of Reference for a consolidation of the record-keeping and the management and security of weapons stocks and for the closing and winding-up of the project.’
Po zaključku projekta za varno skladiščenje in registracijo orožja zračnih sil in mornarice bo projektni direktor izvajal načrte, pripravljene v okviru pristojnosti in nalog projektnega direktorja za leto 2005, za utrditev evidentiranja, upravljanja in varovanja zalog orožja ter za zaključek in prenehanje projekta.“
Done at Brussels, 7 November 2005.
V Bruslju, 7. novembra 2005
appointing a member of the Committee of the Regions
o imenovanju člana Odbora regij
Having regard to the proposal of the United Kingdom Government,
ob upoštevanju predloga britanske vlade,
Following the resignation of Ms Sally POWELL, of which the Council was informed on 21 December 2004, a seat as a member of the Committee of the Regions has become vacant,
Po odstopu ge. Sally POWELL, o čemer je bil Svet obveščen 21. decembra 2004, se je sprostilo eno mesto člana Odbora regij –
Ms Gabrielle KAGAN, Councillor — Brent Council, is hereby appointed a member of the Committee of the Regions in place of Ms Sally POWELL for the remainder of her term of office, which runs until 25 January 2006.
Za preostanek mandata, ki se izteče 25. januarja 2006, se imenuje naslednjo članico Odbora regij: ga. Gabrielle KAGAN Councillor – Brent Council, ki nadomesti go. Sally POWELL.
on the State aid implemented by Germany for Chemische Werke Piesteritz
o državni pomoči Nemčije za Chemische Werke Piesteritz
(notified under document number C(2005) 427)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 427)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter dated 7 March 1997, received on 15 April and registered on 18 April, Germany notified State aid measures in favour of Chemische Werke Piesteritz GmbH (hereinafter CWP).
Z dopisom z dne 7. marca 1997, ki je prispelo 15. aprila in je bilo evidentirano 18. aprila 1997, je Nemčija prijavila ukrepe državne pomoči v korist Chemische Werke Piesteritz GmbH (CWP).
According to the notification, part of the aid had been granted beforehand.
Glede na prijavo je Nemčija del pomoči že izplačala.
The questions raised by the Commission in its letter of 4 November 1997 were discussed in a meeting with the German authorities on 24 November.
Vprašanja, ki jih je Komisija postavila v dopisu z dne 4. novembra, so bila obravnavana na srečanju z nemškimi organi dne 24. novembra 1997.
On 17 June 1997 the Commission received a request for information from a direct competitor of the beneficiary.
junija 1997 je Komisija prejela poizvedbo neposrednega tekmeca prejemnika pomoči.
On 28 July 1997 Société chimique Prayon-Rupel SA (Prayon-Rupel), a direct competitor, expressed concern about the situation from the point of view of competition.
julija 1997 je Société chimique Prayon-Rupel SA (Prayon-Rupel), neposredni tekmec, navedel konkurenčno pravne pomisleke glede pomoči.
On 16 December 1997 the Commission decided not to raise any objections. Germany was informed accordingly on 22 January 1998.
decembra 1997 je Komisija odločila, da ne bo ugovarjala; to je sporočila Nemčiji 22. januarja 1998.
A summary of the decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [2].
Povzetek odločbe je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [2].
In addition, the Commission informed Prayon-Rupel on 19 December 1997 and transmitted the full decision on 5 March 1998.
Poleg tega je Komisija o tem obvestila Prayon-Rupel 19. decembra 1997 in mu 5. marca 1998 predložila celotno odločbo.
On 5 May 1998 Prayon-Rupel brought an action for annulment to the Court of First Instance (CFI).
maja 1998 je Prayon-Rupel na Sodišču prve stopnje vložilo ničnostno tožbo.
On 15 March 2001 the decision in question was annulled [3].
marca 2001 je bila zadevna odločba izrečena za nično [3].
The judgment was notified to the Commission on 19 March 2001.
Sodba je bila Komisiji vročena dne 19. marca 2001.
Following this judgment, the Commission initiated the formal investigation procedure on 20 June 2001.
Zaradi te sodbe je Komisija 20. junija 2001 uvedla uradni preiskovalni postopek.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [4].
Zadevna odločba Komisije je bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [4].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit comments on the aid.
Komisija je pozvala vse zainteresirane stranke, da izrazijo svoje mnenje o pomoči.
By letter dated 20 August 2001, registered on 21 August, comments were submitted by a competitor, Chemische Fabrik Budenheim Rudolf A. Oetker (CFB).
Eden od tekmecev, Chemische Fabrik Budenheim Rudolf A. Oetker (CFB), je z dopisom z dne 20. avgusta 2001, evidentiranim dne 21. avgusta 2001, izrazil svoje mnenje.
By letter dated 10 September 2001, registered on 13 September, Prayon-Rupel added to its comments of 15 June 2001, which had been registered on the same day.
V dopisu z dne 10. septembra 2001, evidentiranim dne 13. septembra 2001, je Prayon-Rupel dopolnilo svoje mnenje z dne 15. junija 2001.
By letter dated 26 September 2001, registered on the same day, comments were submitted by BK Giulini GmbH (BK Giulini).
V dopisu z dne 26. septembra 2001, evidentiranim istega dne, je prispelo mnenje BK Giulini GmbH (BK Giulini).