natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, it was claimed that the amount of benefit should be reduced as it was alleged that the DEPB rate for the product concerned was reduced from 19 to 11 % in February 2004, namely after the IP.
Trdili so tudi, da je treba znesek koristi znižati, saj so navajali, da je bila stopnja DEPB za zadevni izdelek znižana z 19 % na 11 % februarja 2004, tj. po obdobju preiskave.
In response to the first claim, it is noted in recital 33 of the provisional Regulation that ‘the basic Regulation provides for an exception for, inter alia, drawback and substitution drawback schemes which conform to the strict rules laid down in Annex I item (i), Annex II (definition and rules for drawback) and Annex III (definition and rules for substitution drawback)’.
V odgovor na prvo zahtevo je v uvodni izjavi 33 začasne uredbe ugotovljeno, da so v „osnovni uredbi predvidene vse izjeme za, med drugim, sheme povračila in nadomestnega povračila, ki izpolnjujejo stroge predpise iz točke (i) Priloge I, iz Priloge II (opredelitev in predpisi za povračilo) in Priloge III (opredelitev in predpisi za nadomestno povračilo)“.
In this context, it must be noted that the GOI did not apply an effective verification system or procedure to confirm whether and in what amounts inputs were consumed in the production of the exported product (Annex II(II)(4) of the basic Regulation and, in the case of substitution drawback schemes, Annex III(II)(2) of the basic Regulation).
V povezavi s tem je treba zapisati, da IV ni uporabila učinkovitega sistema ali postopka preverjanja, s katerim bi se lahko preverilo, ali so bili vložki porabljeni v proizvodnem procesu blaga za izvoz in v kakšnem obsegu (Priloga II(II)(4) osnovne uredbe in, v primeru shem nadomestnega povračila, Priloga III(II)(2) osnovne uredbe).
Additionally, the GOI did not carry out a post-export examination based on actual inputs involved to determine whether an excess payment occurred, although this would normally be required in the absence of an effectively applied verification system (Annex II(II)(5) and Annex III(II)(3) to the basic Regulation).
Poleg tega IV ni opravila pregleda po izvozu na osnovi dejanskih vložkov, s katerim bi ugotovila, ali je prišlo do presežnega plačila, čeprav se to običajno zahteva, ko ni učinkovitega sistema preverjanja (Priloga II(II)(5) in Priloga III(II)(3) k osnovni uredbi).
Furthermore in recital 37 of the provisional Regulation it was considered that ‘the DEPB on post-export basis cannot be considered as a permitted drawback or substitution drawback scheme (Annex III) under Article 2(1)(a)(ii) of the basic Regulation’.
Nadalje uvodna izjava 37 začasne uredbe predvideva, da „DEPB po izvozu ni mogoče obravnavati kot shemo dovoljenega povračila ali nadomestnega povračila (Priloga III) iz člena 2(1)(a)(ii) osnovne uredbe“.
For these reasons, the conclusion in recital 38 of the provisional Regulation, that ‘the countervailable benefit is the remission of total import duties normally due on all imports’ is hereby confirmed.
Zato se potrdi zaključek v uvodni izjavi 38 začasne uredbe, da je „izpodbojna korist enaka odpustu vseh uvoznih dajatev, ki jih je navadno treba plačati za celoten uvoz“.
To be eligible for benefits under this scheme, a company must export goods.
Za pridobitev koristi iz te sheme mora družba blago izvažati.
At the point in time of the export transaction, a declaration must be made by the exporter to the authorities in India indicating that the export is taking place under the DEPB scheme.
V trenutku, ko pride do izvoznega posla, mora izvoznik organom v Indiji predložiti deklaracijo, v kateri je navedeno, da spada izvoz v shemo DEPB.
In order for the goods to be exported, the Indian customs authorities issue, in advance of the goods being exported, an export shipping bill which shows, inter alia, the amount of DEPB credit which is to be granted for that export transaction.
Za izvoz blaga morajo indijski carinski organi, preden se blago izvozi, izstaviti izvozni ladijski list, ki med drugim izkazuje znesek dobropisa DEPB, odobrenega za izvozni posel.
At this point in time of export, the company knows the benefit it will receive.
Na tej stopnji izvoznega posla je družba seznanjena s koristmi, ki jih bo deležna, iz objavljenih stopenj DEPB, ki so odvisne od izdelka.
Once the customs authorities issue an export shipping bill, the GOI has no discretion over the granting of a DEPB credit.
Ko carinski organi izdajo izvozni ladijski list, IV ne more razsojati o dodelitvi dobropisa DEPB.
It was also verified that any change to the DEPB rates between the actual export and the issuance of a DEPB licence will not affect the level of benefit granted.
Prav tako je bilo potrjeno, da spremembe stopnje DEPB med dejanskim izvozom in izdajo licence DEPB ne vplivajo na stopnjo odobrenih koristi.
The relevant DEPB rate is that which applied at the time the export declaration is made.
Ustrezna stopnja DEPB je tista, ki se uporablja v trenutku, ko se izpolnjuje izvozna deklaracija.
Therefore, there is no possibility for a retroactive amendment to the level of the benefit.
Zato možnost za retroaktivno spreminjanje stopnje koristi ne obstaja.
Accordingly, the moment the export transaction is made, the GOI is liable to forego the customs duties, which constitutes a financial contribution within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a)(i) of the basic Regulation.
Potemtakem se je v trenutku izvoznega posla IV dolžna odreči carinskim dajatvam, kar predstavlja finančni prispevek v smislu člena 2(1)(a)(i) osnovne uredbe.
Article 1(1) of the basic Regulation provides that a ‘countervailing duty may be imposed for the purpose of offsetting any subsidy granted […] whose release for free circulation in the Community causes injury’.
Člen 1(1) osnovne uredbe določa, da „je izravnalno dajatev mogoče naložiti z namenom, da se izravna katera koli dodeljena subvencija, […] katere sprostitev v prosti promet v Skupnosti povzroča škodo“.
The rationale for imposing such a duty is that the prices of the imported goods are lower as a result of having received subsidies and that such lower prices cause injury.
Utemeljitev za naložene dajatve je ta, da so cene uvoženega blaga nižje kot posledica dodeljenih subvencij in da nižje cene povzročajo škodo.
In this case, when exporters of graphite electrode systems are negotiating prices for an export sale, they are aware that that sale benefits from a subsidy under the DEPB scheme.
V tem primeru se izvozniki sistemov grafitnih elektrod med pogajanjem za izvozne cene zavedajo, da bo za to prodajo dodeljena subvencija iz sheme DEPB.
By virtue of the fact that the exporters are aware that they will receive such subsidy, and indeed benefits under other schemes, these companies are already in a competitively more advantageous position at the point in time when they are negotiating prices, that is to say they can reflect the subsidies through offering lower prices.
Na podlagi dejstva, da se izvozniki zavedajo, da bodo prejeli subvencijo, kot tudi koristi iz drugih shem, so te družbe z vidika konkurenčnosti v trenutku pogajanja za ceno že v boljšem položaju, tj. lahko zaradi subvencij ponudijo nižje cene.
The Indian accounting standards provide for booking credits, such as those received under the DEPB scheme, on an accrual basis as income, once (i) such benefits have been earned; and (ii) it is reasonably certain that the ultimate collection of the proceeds of the export transaction will be made.
Indijski računovodski standardi predpisujejo, da se dobropisi, kot so tisti iz sheme DEPB, na osnovi nastanka poslovnega dogodka knjižijo kot prihodek, (i) ko so koristi zaslužene; in (ii) ko je dokaj gotovo, da se bo končni izkupiček od izvoznega posla pobral.
What is relevant here is the point at which ‘benefits have been earned’.
Pomemben je trenutek, v katerem so bile „koristi zaslužene“.
As stated in recital 10 above, once the customs authorities issue an export shipping bill which shows, inter alia, the amount of DEPB credit which is to be granted for that export transaction, the GOI has no discretion as to whether or not to grant the subsidy and it has no discretion as to the amount of the subsidy.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 10 zgoraj, IV ne more razsojati o dodelitvi subvencije ali o znesku subvencije, potem ko carinski organi izdajo izvozni ladijski list, ki med drugim izkazuje znesek dobropisa DEPB, odobren za izvozni posel.
Also, as stated above in the same recital, any change to the DEPB rates between the actual export and the issuance of a DEPB licence has no retroactive effect on the level of benefit granted.
Ista uvodna izjava prav tako navaja, da spremembe stopnje DEPB med dejanskim izvozom in izdajo licence DEPB nimajo retroaktivnega učinka na stopnjo odobrenih koristi.
Finally, as stated in recital 11 above, the prices of export transactions are considered to reflect the subsidies (that is to say through lower prices) from which they can benefit.
Uvodna izjava 11 zgoraj končno navaja tudi, da se šteje, da cene izvoznih poslov odražajo subvencije (tj. z nižjimi cenami), ki jim prinašajo korist.
In these circumstances, it is considered that benefits are earned when the export transaction is made.
Pod temi pogoji se šteje, da so koristi zaslužene, ko je izvozni posel opravljen.
On this basis, companies can, in line with Indian accounting standards, book the DEPB credit as income at the stage of export transaction.
Na tej osnovi lahko družbe v skladu z indijskimi računovodskimi standardi knjižijo dobropis DEPB kot prihodek v fazi izvoznega posla.
In accordance with Articles 2(2) and 5 of the basic Regulation, the amount of countervailable subsidies shall be calculated in terms of the benefit conferred on the recipient, which is found to exist during the investigation period.
V skladu s členoma 2(2) in 5 osnovne uredbe je treba znesek izpodbojnih subvencij izračunati v smislu koristi, prenesene na prejemnika, katere obstoj se ugotovi med obdobjem preiskave.
In light of the above, it is considered appropriate to assess the benefit under this scheme as being the sum of the credits earned on all export transactions made under this scheme during the investigation period.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega se šteje, da je ustrezno oceniti korist iz te sheme kot vsoto dobropisov, zasluženih za vse izvozne posle iz te sheme v času obdobja preiskave.
This differs from the approach followed in the provisional Regulation where the sum of the credits utilised was assessed.
Tak pristop je drugačen od tistega v začasni uredbi, kjer je bila ocenjena vsota izrabljenih dobropisov.
In accordance with Article 7(1)(a) of the basic Regulation, fees necessarily incurred to obtain the subsidy were deducted.
V skladu s členom 7(1)(a) osnovne uredbe so bile odbite pristojbine, potrebne za pridobitev subvencije.
In respect of the final argument relating to the alleged reduction of the DEPB rate, it is accepted that prima facie evidence has been submitted to show that the DEPB rate for the product concerned was reduced to 11 % with effect from 9 February 2004.
Ob upoštevanju končnih argumentov v zvezi z domnevnim znižanjem stopnje DEPB se priznava, da je bil predložen verjeten dokaz, ki izkazuje, da je bila stopnja DEPB za zadevni izdelek znižana na 11 % z začetkom veljavnosti 9. februarja 2004.
However, as the amount of benefit is assessed on the basis of the amount of benefit earned on all export transactions made during the IP, the reduction in the DEPB rate after this period will have no effect on the level of subsidy determined.
Ker pa se znesek dobropisa ocenjuje na osnovi zneska dobropisa, zasluženega z vsemi izvoznimi posli, izvedenimi med obdobjem preiskave, nima znižanje stopnje DEPB po tem obdobju nobenega vpliva na določitev stopnje subvencije.
On the basis of these changes, the benefit under this scheme for the two cooperating companies was revised to 16,6 and 14,4 % respectively.
Na osnovi teh sprememb se je korist iz te sheme za ti dve sodelujoči družbi popravila na 16,6 % oz. 14,4 %.
Export promotion capital goods scheme (EPCGS)
Shema „Export Promotion Capital Goods“ (EPCG)
In the absence of any comments from interested parties, the conclusions outlined in recitals 56 to 58 of the provisional Regulation, are hereby confirmed.
Ker zainteresirane stranke niso vložile nobene pripombe, se potrdijo zaključki, opisani v uvodnih izjavah 56 do 58 začasne uredbe.
Advance licence scheme (ALS)
Shema vnaprejšnjih dovoljenj (ALS)
At the provisional stage, one exporting producer in India was deemed to have received a countervailable benefit under this scheme.
V predhodni fazi se je za enega proizvajalca - izvoznika v Indiji štelo, da je prejel izpodbojno korist iz te sheme.
The representatives of this exporter claimed both that (i) the scheme was not countervailable; and (ii) in any case, any benefit received was only granted to a business unit of the company which did not manufacture the product concerned and which had been sold off by the company subsequent to the IP.
Predstavniki tega izvoznika so trdili, da (i) shema ni izpodbojna; in (ii), da je bila tako ali tako vsakršna prejeta korist odobrena samo poslovnemu obratu družbe, ki zadevnega izdelka ni proizvajal in ki ga je družba po obdobju preiskave prodala.
Accordingly, it was claimed that no benefit under the ALS should be attributed to the exporter.
Potemtakem se izvozniku ne bi smele dodeljevati koristi iz sheme ALS.
In respect of the first claim, no new evidence was provided to show that the ALS was not a countervailable export subsidy.
V zvezi s prvo zahtevo niso bili posredovani nobeni novi dokazi, ki bi potrjevali, da ALS ni izpodbojna izvozna subvencija.
In this context, it is recalled that the GOI did not apply an effective verification system or procedure to confirm whether and in what amounts inputs were consumed in the production of the exported product (Annex II(II)(4) of the basic Regulation and, in the case of substitution drawback schemes, Annex III(II)(2) of the basic Regulation).
V zvezi s tem je treba opomniti, da IV ni uporabila učinkovitega sistema ali postopka preverjanja, s katerim bi se lahko preverilo, ali so bili vložki porabljeni v proizvodnem procesu blaga za izvoz in v kakšnem obsegu (Priloga II(II)(4) osnovne uredbe in, v primeru shem nadomestnega povračila, Priloga III(II)(2) osnovne uredbe).
For these reasons, the conclusions in recitals 64 to 70 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Zato se potrdijo zaključki v uvodnih izjavah 64 do 70 začasne uredbe.
In respect of the second claim, it was found that during the IP the exporter concerned had benefited from the scheme and had, as a result, received a countervailable benefit.
Glede druge zahteve je bilo ugotovljeno, da je med obdobjem preiskave zadevni izvoznik izkoristil shemo in je zato prejel izpodbojno korist.
Furthermore, the fact that the business unit producing this product was sold subsequent to the IP, is not relevant for determining whether the company benefited of a subsidy during the IP.
Nadalje dejstvo, da je bil poslovni obrat, ki je izdelek proizvedel, prodan po obdobju preiskave, ni pomembno pri določanju, ali je družba prejela subvencijo med obdobjem preiskave.
In addition, it is not considered to be relevant when assessing the level of the subsidisation of the company as a whole, whether the subsidy scheme was targeted at a unit of the company that did not itself produce the product concerned.
Poleg tega se pri presoji stopnje subvencioniranja družbe kot celote ne šteje kot pomembno, da je bila subvencijska shema namenjena obratu te družbe, ki ni proizvedel zadevnega izdelka.
Indeed, it is the company as a whole which is examined, and thus any benefit to one of the units is considered to represent a benefit for the company as a whole.
Preverja se namreč celotna družba in tako se vsaka korist enega obrata šteje kot korist celotne družbe.
To that end, it is confirmed that during the IP, the business unit which benefited from the ALS scheme and the business units which manufactured the product concerned, formed one legal economic entity.
Zatorej se potrdi, da sta med obdobjem preiskave poslovni obrat, ki je izkoristil shemo ALS, in poslovni obrat, ki je zadevni izdelek proizvedel, tvorila en pravni ekonomski subjekt.
Therefore, the conclusion outlined in recital 71 of the provisional Regulation is hereby confirmed.
Zato se potrdi zaključek, opisan v uvodni izjavi 71 začasne uredbe.
Export processing zones (EPZ)/export orientated unit (EOU)
Cone izvozne proizvodnje (EPZ)/Izvozno usmerjene enote (EOU)
In the absence of any comments from interested parties, the conclusion outlined in recital 72 of the provisional Regulation, is hereby confirmed.
Ker zainteresirane stranke niso vložile nobene pripombe, se potrdi zaključek, opisan v uvodni izjavi 72 začasne uredbe.
Income tax exemption (ITE)
Oprostitev davka na dohodek (ITE)
In the absence of any comments from interested parties, the conclusion outlined in recital 74 of the provisional Regulation, is hereby confirmed.
Ker zainteresirane stranke niso vložile nobene pripombe, se potrdi zaključek, opisan v uvodni izjavi 74 začasne uredbe.
Amount of countervailable subsidies
Višina subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi
In light of the conclusions outlined above, the amount of countervailable subsidies is definitively confirmed, as follows:
V smislu zgoraj opisanih zaključkov se višina subvencij, proti katerim se lahko uvedejo izravnalni ukrepi, dokončno potrdi, kot sledi:
Type of subsidy
Vrsta subvencije
All others
Vsi ostali
COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
GOSPODARSKA PANOGA SKUPNOSTI
In the absence of any substantially new information or argument in this particular respect, recitals 76 to 79 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile posredovane bistvene nove zadevne informacije ali argumenti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 76 do 79 začasne uredbe.
Following the provisional disclosure, the Indian exporters pointed to the divergence in the undercutting margin of one particular type of the product concerned, as compared with the undercutting margins of similar types.
Po začasnem razkritju so indijski izvozniki opozorili na razhajanje v stopnji nelojalnega nižanja cen določenega tipa zadevnega proizvoda v primerjavi s stopnjo nelojalnega nižanja cen pri podobnih tipih.
The claim was properly examined and it was found that the discrepancy was due to a mistake in the reporting of a number of credit notes and discounts of one particular Community producer.
Po temeljiti preučitvi zahteve je bilo ugotovljeno, da je razhajanje posledica napake pri poročanju o številu dobropisov in popustov določenega proizvajalca Skupnosti.
The claim was therefore accepted and the undercutting margin of this particular type and, where applicable, of other types were corrected accordingly.
Zatorej je bil zahtevek sprejet, stopnja nelojalnega nižanja cen za ta določen tip in, kjer je ustrezno, za druge tipe pa je bila popravljena.
It was further found that a number of sale transactions of the Community industry used for the undercutting calculations were double-counted.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo število prodajnih poslov industrije Skupnosti, uporabljeno za izračun nelojalnega nižanja cen, šteto dvojno.
In view of this, the double-counted transactions had to be eliminated and the undercutting calculations had to be modified accordingly.
Glede na to je bilo treba izbrisati dvojno štete posle in ustrezno spremeniti izračune nelojalnega nižanja cen.
However, this double-counting had not taken place when establishing the figures used for assessing the injury indicators.
Vendar pa tega dvojnega štetja ni bilo ob določanju izračunov za oceno indikatorjev škode.
Therefore, there was no need to modify the injury indicators.
Zatorej indikatorjev škode ni bilo treba spreminjati.
As a result, the comparison showed that during the IP the prices of the product concerned originating in India and sold in the Community undercut the Community industry’s prices by between 3 and 11 %.
Posledično je primerjava pokazala, da so med obdobjem preiskave cene zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Indije, ki se je prodajal v Skupnosti, znižale cene industrije Skupnosti za 3 % do 11 %.
In the absence of any substantially new information or argument in this particular respect, recitals 80 to 116 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed, with the exception of recital 86 (see recitals 24 to 26 above).
Ker niso bile posredovane bistvene nove zadevne informacije ali argumenti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 80 do 116 začasne uredbe, z izjemo uvodne izjave 86 (glej uvodne izjave 24 do 26 zgoraj).
Return to normal competition conditions after the dismantling of the cartel
Vrnitev k normalnim konkurenčnim pogojem po odpravi kartela
The Indian exporters reiterated their argument that the establishment of a causal link between the subsidised imports and the injury suffered by the Community industry is based on data which would be unreliable because of the existence of a cartel up until the beginning of 1998.
Indijski izvozniki so ponovno poudarili argument, da temelji vzpostavitev vzročne povezave med subvencioniranimi uvozi in škodo, povzročeno industriji Skupnosti, na podatkih, ki naj ne bi bili zanesljivi zaradi obstoja kartela do začetka 1998.
However, the Indian exporters did not provide any new information within the deadline set for submitting comments in this particular respect.
Vendar pa indijski izvozniki niso posredovali nobene nove informacije v tozadevno določenem roku.
In the absence of any substantially new information or argument, recitals 117 to 137 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile posredovane bistvene nove zadevne informacije ali argumenti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 117 do 137 začasne uredbe.
An association representing users and a user company reiterated their main concern that, by excluding Indian suppliers from the Community market, the imposition of any measure would reduce overall competition on the Community market for this particular product and inevitably lead to an increase in prices.
Združenje predstavnikov potrošnikov in podjetje uporabnik sta ponovno poudarila, da ju v glavnem skrbi, da bi z izključitvijo indijskih dobaviteljev iz trga Skupnosti naložitev kakršnih koli ukrepov zmanjšala splošno konkurenčnost na trgu Skupnosti za ta določen izdelek in nujno povzročila povišanje cen.
However, as assessed under recital 147 of the provisional Regulation, the impact of any increase in the price of the like product for final customers is likely to be minimal.
Vendar pa je verjetno, kot je bilo ocenjeno v uvodni izjavi 147 začasne uredbe, da bo vpliv povišanja cene podobnega izdelka za končnega potrošnika minimalen.
It is further recalled that the purpose of any countervailing measure is by no means to stop access into the Community of products from India, but rather to restore a level playing field that had been distorted by unfair trade practices.
Nadalje je bilo ponovno omenjeno, da namen izravnalnih ukrepov nikakor ni preprečiti vstop izdelkov iz Indije v Skupnost, ampak ponovno vzpostaviti enake konkurenčne pogoje, ki so bili moteni zaradi nepoštene trgovinske prakse.
Finally, it is considered that the level of the measures is not such as to exclude the Indian producers from the Community market.
Končno se šteje, da stopnja ukrepov ni tolikšna, da bi izključila indijske proizvajalce iz trga Skupnosti.
In the absence of any substantially new information or argument in this particular respect, recitals 138 to 151 of the provisional Regulation are hereby confirmed.
Ker niso bile posredovane bistvene nove zadevne informacije ali argumenti, se potrdijo uvodne izjave 138 do 151 začasne uredbe.
I. INJURY ELIMINATION LEVEL
I. STOPNJA ODPRAVE ŠKODE
Further to disclosure of provisional findings, several interested parties claimed that the profit level of 9,4 % deemed to represent the financial situation of the Community industry in the absence of injurious subsidisation from India was too high.
Na podlagi razkritja začasnih ugotovitev so številne zainteresirane stranke trdile, da je raven dobička z 9,4 %, ki naj bi predstavljala finančno situacijo industrije Skupnosti brez škodljivih subvencij iz Indije, previsoka.