natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 13 of the basic Regulation aims to counter circumvention practices without affecting operators which can prove that they are not involved in such practices, but it does not contain a specific provision providing for the treatment of producers which could establish that they are not involved in circumvention practices.
Cilj člena 13 osnovne uredbe je preprečiti prakso izogibanja, ne da bi to vplivalo na gospodarske subjekte, ki lahko svojo nevpletenost v tovrstno prakso dokažejo, vendar pa ne vsebuje izrecnih določil, ki bi predvidevala obravnavo proizvajalcev, ki so lahko dokazali, da niso vpleteni v prakso izogibanja.
Therefore, it appears necessary to introduce a possibility for producers which have not sold the product concerned for export during the IP and are not related to any exporters or producers subject to the extended anti-dumping duty to request an exemption from the measures on these imports.
Zato se zdi potrebno vpeljati možnost za proizvajalce, ki niso prodajali zadevnega izdelka za izvoz v času OP in ki niso povezani z nobenim od izvoznikov ali proizvajalcev, za katere se uporablja razširjena protidampinška dajatev, da bi zaprosili za izvzetje iz ukrepov na te uvoze.
The producers concerned which would consider lodging a request for an exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty would be required to complete a questionnaire in order to enable the Commission to determine whether an exemption may be warranted.
Zadevni proizvajalci, ki bi hoteli vložiti prošnjo za izvzetje iz razširjenih protidampinških dajatev, bi morali izpolniti vprašalnik, s katerim bi Skupnosti omogočili, da ugotovi, ali je izvzetje upravičeno.
Such exemption may be granted after the assessment of, for instance, the market situation of the product concerned, production capacity and capacity utilisation, procurement and sales and the likelihood of practices for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification and the evidence of dumping.
Tako izvzetje je mogoče dovoliti po presoji npr. tržnega položaja zadevnega izdelka, proizvodne zmogljivosti in uporabe zmogljivosti, nabave in prodaje ter verjetnosti izvajanja prakse, za katero ni potrebnega razloga ali ekonomske razlage ter o kateri obstajajo dokazi za damping.
The Commission would normally also carry out an on-spot verification visit.
Običajno bi Komisija tudi izvedla obisk zaradi preveritve na mestu samem.
The request would have to be addressed to the Commission forthwith, with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production and sales.
Prošnjo je potrebno takoj nasloviti na Komisijo z vsemi ustreznimi podatki, še posebej o spremembah dejavnosti družbe, ki so povezane s proizvodnjo in prodajo.
Importers could still benefit from exemption for registration or measures to the extent that their imports are from exporters, which are granted such an exemption, and in accordance with Article 13(4) of the basic Regulation.
Uvozniki bi bili še vedno izvzeti iz registracije ali ukrepov v obsegu, v katerem njihov uvoz prihaja od izvoznikov, ki jim je bilo izvzetje odobreno, in v skladu s členom 13(4) osnovne uredbe.
Where an exemption is warranted, the Commission should, after consultation of the Advisory Committee, propose the amendment of this Regulation accordingly.
Če so izvzetja upravičena, bo Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom predlagala ustrezno spremembo te uredbe.
Subsequently, any exemptions granted should be monitored to ensure compliance with the conditions set therein.
Vsa odobrena izvzetja se bodo spremljala, da se zagotovi skladnost s pogoji, ki jih ta izvzetja določajo.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Council intended to extend the definitive anti-dumping duty in force and were given the opportunity to comment.
Zainteresirane stranke so bile obveščene o bistvenih dejstvih in preudarkih, na podlagi katerih je Svet nameraval razširiti dokončne veljavne protidampinške dajatve. Imele so možnost podati svoje pripombe.
No comments which were of a nature to change the abovementioned conclusions were received,
Pripomb, zaradi katerih bi bilo treba spremeniti zgoraj navedene zaključke, ni bilo –
The definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 964/2003 on imports of tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, falling within CN codes ex73079311 (TARIC code 7307931199), ex73079319 (TARIC code 7307931999), ex73079930 (TARIC code 7307993098) and ex73079990 (TARIC code 7307999098) and originating in the People's Republic of China (PRC) is hereby extended to imports of tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings), of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently classifiable within CN codes ex73079311 (TARIC code 7307931193), ex73079319 (TARIC code 7307931993), ex73079930 (TARIC code 7307993093) and ex73079990 (TARIC code 7307999093) consigned from Indonesia, whether declared as originating in Indonesia or not.
Dokončna protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 964/2003 na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi (razen za liti pribor (fitinge), prirobnice in pribor (fitinge) z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavečega jekla) z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, kakršen se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene in se uvršča pod oznake KN ex73079311 (oznaka TARIC 7307931199), ex73079319 (oznaka TARIC 7307931999), ex73079930 (oznaka TARIC 7307993098) in ex73079990 (oznaka TARIC 7307999098), s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske se razširi na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi (razen za liti pribor (fitinge), prirobnice in pribor (fitinge) z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavečega jekla) z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, kakršen se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene in se trenutno uvršča pod oznake KN ex73079311 (oznaka TARIC 7307931193), ex73079319 (oznaka TARIC 7307931993), ex73079930 (oznaka TARIC 7307993093) in ex73079990 (oznaka TARIC 7307999093), ki je bil poslan iz Indonezije in prijavljen kot s poreklom iz Indonezije ali ne.
The duty extended by paragraph 1 of this Article shall be collected on imports registered in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2004 and Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
Dajatev, razširjena z odstavkom 1 tega člena, se pobira za uvoz, registriran v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2004 in členov 13(3) in 14(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96.
Requests for exemption from the duty extended by Article 1 shall be made in writing in one of the official languages of the Community and must be signed by a person authorised to represent the applicant.
Prošnje za izvzetje iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1, se predložijo v pisni obliki v enem od uradnih jezikov Skupnosti in morajo biti podpisane s strani osebe, ki je pooblaščena za zastopanje vlagatelja.
The request shall be sent to the following address:
Prošnjo je treba poslati na naslednji naslov:
Directorate-General for Trade
Generalni direktorat za trgovino
Fax (32 2) 295 65 05
Faks (32-2) 295 65 05
The Commission, after consulting the Advisory Committee, may authorise, by decision, the exemption of imports from companies which do not circumvent the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 964/2003 from the duty extended by Article 1, and propose the amendment of the Regulation accordingly.
Komisija lahko po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom s sklepom odobri izvzetje uvoza iz dajatve, razširjene s členom 1 te uredbe, za katerega se izkaže, da se ne izogiba protidampinški dajatvi, ki jo je uvedla Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 964/2003.
Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2004.
Carinskim organom se naloži, da ustavijo registracijo uvoza, uvedeno v skladu s členom 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2004.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1496/2004(OJ L 275, 25.8.2004, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1496/2004 (UL L 275, 25.8.2004, str. 3).
OJ L 65, 3.3.2004, p. 10.
UL L 65, 3.3.2004, str. 10.
Regulation (EC) No 584/96 (OJ L 84, 3.4.1996, p. 1).
Uredba (ES) št. 584/96 (UL L 84, 3.4.1996, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 2053/2004
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2053/2004
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 964/2003 on imports of tube or pipe fittings, of iron or steel, originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of tube or pipe fittings, of iron or steel, consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 964/2003 za uvoz določenega pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi iz železa ali jekla, poslanega s Šrilanke, ki se prijavijo kot izdelki s poreklom s Šrilanke ali ne
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije, ki ga je Komisija predložila po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
Following an expiry review, the Council imposed by Regulation (EC) No 964/2003 [2] (the original Regulation), inter alia, definitive anti-dumping duties of 58,6 % on imports of tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings) of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, falling within CN codes ex73079311 (TARIC code 7307931199), ex73079319 (TARIC code 7307931999), ex73079930 (TARIC code 7307993098) and ex73079990 (TARIC code 7307999098) and originating in the People's Republic of China (PRC).
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 964/2003 [2] („prvotna uredba“) med drugim uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve v višini 58,6 % na uvoz pribora (fitingov) za cevi (razen za liti pribor (fitingi), prirobnice in pribor (fitinge) z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavečega jekla) z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, kakršen se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene, uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311 (oznaka TARIC 7307931199), ex73079319 (oznaka TARIC 7307931999), ex73079930 (oznaka TARIC 7307993098) in ex73079990 (oznaka TARIC 7307999098) in s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
Request
Zahteva
On 20 January 2004, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC.
Dne 20. januarja 2004 je Komisija prejela zahtevo v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenih na uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK.
The request was submitted by the Defence Committee of the Steel Butt-Welding Fittings Industry of the European Union on behalf of four Community producers.
Zahtevek je v imenu štirih proizvajalcev Skupnosti vložil Zaščitni odbor industrije EU za jekleni pribor (fitinge) za varjenje.
The request alleged that there had been a change in the pattern of trade following the imposition of the anti-dumping measures on imports of tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC, as shown by a significant increase in imports of the same product from Sri Lanka.
V zahtevi so trdili, da se je vzorec trgovanja po uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov na uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK spremenil, saj se je uvoz podobnega izdelka s Šrilanke močno povečal.
This change in the pattern of trade was alleged to stem from the transhipment of tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC via Sri Lanka.
Sprememba vzorca trgovanja je domnevno izvirala iz pretovarjanja pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK preko Šrilanke.
It was further alleged that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for these practices other than the existence of the anti-dumping duties on tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC.
Nadalje so trdili, da za te prakse ni bilo mogoče najti potrebnega razloga ali ekonomsko razlago in da se izvaja z namenom izogniti se plačilu protidampinških dajatev, ki so v veljavi za uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK.
Finally, the applicant alleged that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping duties on tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices and that dumping was taking place in relation to the normal values previously established for the tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC.
Nazadnje je vlagatelj trdil, da je popravljalni učinek obstoječih protidampinških dajatev na uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK oslabljen v smislu količine in cene, ter da se vrši damping v zvezi z normalnimi vrednostmi, ki so bile predhodno ugotovljene za pribor za cevi s poreklom iz LRK.
The Commission, by Regulation (EC) No 395/2004 [3] (the initiating Regulation) initiated an investigation into the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC by imports of tube or pipe fittings consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not and pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, directed the customs authorities to register imports of tube or pipe fittings consigned from Sri Lanka, whether declared as originating in Sri Lanka or not, under CN codes ex73079311 (TARIC code 7307931194), ex73079319 (TARIC code 7307931994), ex73079930 (TARIC code 7307993094) and ex73079990 (TARIC code 7307999094) as from 4 March 2004.
Komisija je začela preiskavo v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 395/2004 [3] („začetna uredba“) zaradi domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenih za uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK, v zvezi z uvozom pribora za cevi, poslanega s Šrilanke, ki se prijavi kot izdelek s poreklom s Šrilanke ali ne, v skladu s členom 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe, in naložila carinskim organom, da od 4. maja 2004 registrirajo uvoz pribora za cevi, poslanega s Šrilanke, ki se prijavi kot izdelek s poreklom s Šrilanke ali ne, pod oznake KN ex73079311 (oznaka TARIC 7307931194), ex73079319 (oznaka TARIC 7307931994), ex73079930 (oznaka TARIC 7307993094) in ex73079990 (oznaka TARIC 7307999094).
The Commission advised the authorities of the PRC and Sri Lanka of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je organe LRK in Šrilanke obvestila o začetku preiskave.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC (there were no known producers in Sri Lanka) as well as to importers in the Community named in the request or known to the Commission from the investigation which lead to the imposition of the existing measures on imports of tube or pipe fittings originating in the PRC (the previous investigation).
Proizvajalcem/izvoznikom v LRK so bili poslani vprašalniki (na Šrilanki ni bilo znanih proizvajalcev), prav tako tudi uvoznikom v Skupnosti, za katere je Komisija vedela iz preiskave, ki je pripeljala do uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov na uvoz pribora za cevi s poreklom iz LRK („predhodna preiskava“).
No producer or exporter in the PRC submitted a reply to the questionnaire and no reply to the questionnaire was submitted by any importer in the Community.
Na vprašalnik ni odgovoril noben proizvajalec ali izvoznik iz LRK, prav tako pa ni posredoval odgovora na vprašalnik noben uvoznik iz Skupnosti.
No producers or exporters in Sri Lanka made themselves known or submitted questionnaire replies.
Prav tako se ni prijavil oz. posredoval odgovora na vprašalnik noben proizvajalec/izvoznik s Šrilanke.
Data from 2000 up to the end of the IP were used to investigate the change in the pattern of trade.
Podatki od leta 2000 naprej do konca OP so se uporabili za preiskavo spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja.
No producers or exporters of tube or pipe fittings originating in Sri Lanka cooperated in the investigation.
V preiskavi ni sodeloval noben proizvajalec ali izvoznik pribora za cevi s poreklom s Šrilanke.
In fact, the authorities of Sri Lanka informed the Commission that no Sri Lankan companies were registered as manufacturers of tube or pipe fittings as defined in the initiating Regulation.
Pravzaprav so organi Šrilanke Komisijo obvestili, da na Šrilanki ni družbe, ki bi bila registrirana kot proizvajalec pribora za cevi, kot jih opredeljuje začetna uredba.
The only feedback received from importers was statements that they did not import tube or pipe fittings from Sri Lanka.
Edina povratna informacija, ki je prispela od uvoznikov, je bila trditev, da s Šrilanke niso uvozili pribora za cevi.
It was made clear to importers and to the authorities of Sri Lanka that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Organom Šrilanke in uvoznikom je bilo pojasnjeno, da lahko nepripravljenost na sodelovanje privede do uporabe člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
These parties were also made aware of the consequences of non-cooperation.
Strankam so bile pojasnjene tudi posledice nesodelovanja.
It was made clear to these companies that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Nesodelujočim družbam je bilo pojasnjeno, da lahko nepripravljenost do sodelovanja privede do uporabe člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned by the alleged circumvention is tube or pipe fittings (other than cast fittings, flanges and threaded fittings) of iron or steel (not including stainless steel), with a greatest external diameter not exceeding 609,6 mm, of a kind used for butt-welding or other purposes, currently classifiable within CN codes ex73079311 (TARIC code 7307931194), ex73079319 (TARIC code 7307931994), ex73079930 (TARIC code 7307993094) and ex73079990 (TARIC code 7307999094).
Izdelek, za katerega domnevno poteka izogibanje, je pribor (fitingi) za cevi (razen liti pribor (fitingi), prirobnice in pribor (fitingi) z navojem) iz železa ali jekla (razen nerjavečega jekla) z največjim zunanjim premerom do vključno 609,6 mm, kakršen se uporablja za varjenje ali druge namene, trenutno uvrščen pod oznake KN ex73079311 (oznaka TARIC 7307931194), ex73079319 (oznaka TARIC 7307931994), ex73079930 (oznaka TARIC 7307993094) in ex73079990 (oznaka TARIC 7307999094).
In the absence of cooperation by any parties in Sri Lanka and considering the change in the pattern of trade as described in the following section, it must be inferred, in the absence of any contrary evidence, that the tube or pipe fittings exported to the Community from the PRC and those consigned from Sri Lanka have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and have the same uses.
Zaradi nesodelovanja vseh strank s Šrilanke ter ob upoštevanju sprememb v vzorcu trgovanja, opisanih v nadaljevanju, je potrebno v odsotnosti kakršnih koli nasprotnih dokazil sklepati, da ima pribor za cevi, ki se v Skupnost izvaža iz LRK, ter tisti, ki se pošilja s Šrilanke, enake temeljne fizične in kemične lastnosti ter enak namen uporabe.
They are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato veljata za podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
As stated in recital 4, the change in the pattern of the trade was alleged to stem from transhipment via Sri Lanka.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (4), sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja domnevno izvira iz pretovarjanja preko Šrilanke.
As no Sri Lankan company cooperated in the investigation, exports from Sri Lanka to the Community had to be established on the basis of the facts available, pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker v preiskavi ni sodelovala nobena družba s Šrilanke, je bilo potrebno izvoze s Šrilanke v Skupnost ugotoviti na osnovi razpoložljivih podatkov v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
Eurostat data, which were the most appropriate information available, were therefore used to establish the export prices and quantities from Sri Lanka to the Community.
Podatki Eurostata, ki so bili najustreznejši razpoložljivi vir informacij, so bili uporabljeni za ugotavljanje izvoznih cen in količin s Šrilanke v Skupnost.
Imports of tube or pipe fittings from Sri Lanka increased from 0 tonnes in 2000 to 302 tonnes in the IP.
Uvoz pribora za cevi s Šrilanke v Skupnost je narasel iz 0 ton leta 2000 na 302 ton v OP.
These imports from Sri Lanka commenced in July 2002, at a time when the previous investigation was ongoing.
Uvozi s Šrilanke so se začeli julija 2002, to je v času, ko je potekala predhodna preiskava.
Imports into the Community of tube or pipe fittings from the PRC increased from 44 tonnes in 2000 to 287 tonnes in the IP.
Uvoz pribora za cevi iz LRK v Skupnost je narasel iz 44 ton leta 2000 na 287 toni v OP.
However, this increase in exports from the PRC must be read together with the level of exports achieved in the period under consideration in the original investigation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 584/96 [4].
Vendar pa je potrebno na porast izvoza iz LRK gledati skupaj s stopnjo izvoza, doseženo v zadevnem obdobju prvotne preiskave po Uredbi (ES) št. 584/96 [4].
Indeed, the volume of the Chinese exports in the IP amounted to less than 10 % of the volume exported in the period under consideration in the original investigation.
Vsekakor pa je obseg kitajskih izvozov v OP znašal manj kot 10 % obsega izvoza v obdobju prvotne preiskave.
In the light of the above, and in the absence of any contrary evidence, it was found that imports consigned from Sri Lanka were compensating for some of the previous imports from the PRC.
Z upoštevanjem zgoraj navedenega in zaradi pomanjkanja nasprotnih dokazov je bilo ugotovljeno, da so uvozi, poslani s Šrilanke, izravnava za nekatere predhodne uvoze iz LRK.
From the figures above, it is concluded that there has been a clear change in the pattern of trade which started with the previous investigation leading to the imposition of the existing measures on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and developed rapidly after the imposition of these measures.
Iz zgornjih številk se sklepa, da je prišlo do očitne spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja, ki se je začela s predhodno preiskavo, s katero so se uvedli obstoječi ukrepi na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK, in ki se je po uvedbi teh ukrepov hitro razvila.
In the absence of cooperation by any parties in Sri Lanka or the PRC and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that, given the coincidence in time with the previous investigation which led to the imposition of the existing measures, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the existence of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ni sodelovala nobena izmed strank s Šrilanke oz. iz LRK ter zaradi pomanjkanja kakršnih koli nasprotnih dokazov, je potrebno glede na sovpadanje v času s predhodno preiskavo, ki je privedla do uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov, sklepati, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročil obstoj protidampinških dajatev na uvoz zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK, ne pa drugi potrebni razlogi ali ekonomska razlaga v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.