natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is recalled that, following the alleged appearance of a new product type on the market which shares the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and end uses as the product covered by the measures, a partial interim review limited in scope to the definition of the product concerned was initiated on 31 March 2004 (see recitals 6 to 8).
Poudariti je treba, da je bil 31. marca 2004 po domnevnem pojavu nove vrste izdelka na trgu, ki ima enake osnovne fizikalne in kemične lastnosti ter končne uporabe kot izdelek, ki ga zadevajo ukrepi, začet delni vmesni pregled, omejen na opredelitev zadevnega izdelka (glej uvodne izjave 6 do 8).
However, the product concerned by the present review is the same as the one under consideration in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2737/90 and its subsequent amendments, i.e. tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide falling within CN code 28499030.
Vendar je izdelek, ki ga zadeva ta pregled, enak izdelku, ki je bil obravnavan v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 2737/90 in njenih kasnejših spremembah, tj. volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid, ki spadata pod oznako KN 28499030.
Tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide are compounds of carbon and tungsten produced by heat treatment (carburisation in the first case, fusion in the second).
Volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid sta spojini ogljika in volframa, ki se pridobivata s toplotno obdelavo (ogljičenjem v prvem primeru, zlitjem v drugem).
Both products are intermediate products, used as input materials in the manufacture of hard metal components such as cemented carbide cutting tools and high-wear components, in abrasion — resistant coatings, in bits for oil drilling and mining tools as well as in dies and tips for the drawing and forging of metals.
Oba izdelka sta vmesna izdelka, ki se uporabljata kot vnosna materiala za izdelavo komponent iz trdih kovin, kot npr. rezalna orodja iz cementnega karbida, visokoobrabne komponente, za izdelavo premazov proti odrgninam, rezil za črpanje nafte, orodij za rudarstvo, pa tudi v orodjih in konicah za oblikovanje in kovanje kovin.
Some exporters argued that tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide were different products.
Nekateri izvozniki so zatrjevali, da sta volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid različna izdelka.
This was based on the assertion that their production processes are completely different, and that their end uses are also different.
To so utemeljevali s trditvijo, da sta postopka za proizvajanje teh dveh izdelkov popolnoma različna ter da sta različni tudi njuni končni uporabi.
It is recalled that in recital (11) of Council Regulation (EC) No 771/98, the investigation had shown that, although their manufacturing process is different, tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide have the same chemical composition (both consist of approximately 92 to 94 % of tungsten metal and 4 to 6 % of carbon) and come from the same stage in the tungsten production chain, i.e. between tungsten metal powder and carbide tools and wear-resisting materials.
Poudariti je treba, da je v uvodni izjavi 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 771/98 preiskava pokazala, da čeprav sta postopka njune izdelave različna, imata volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid enako kemično sestavo (oba sestavlja približno 92 do 94 % volframove kovine in 4 do 6 % ogljika) in izhajata iz iste stopnje v proizvodni verigi volframa, tj. med kovinskim prahom volframa ter karbidnimi orodji in materiali, odpornimi proti obrabi.
Furthermore, they are put to similar end-uses in the industry, i.e. as a surface hardening component.
Nadalje imata podobni končni uporabi v industriji, tj. kot komponenti za površinsko utrjanje.
Although for certain specific and limited applications which require higher wear and abrasive resistance only fused tungsten carbide is used, fused tungsten carbide and tungsten carbide are generally interchangeable.
Čeprav se za določene specifične in omejene namene, ki zahtevajo višjo odpornost proti obrabi, uporablja le taljeni volframov karbid, sta taljeni volframov karbid in volframov karbid v splošnem medsebojno zamenljiva.
It was therefore concluded in the previous review investigation, that tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide are one single product for the purpose of the investigation.
Zato je bilo v prejšnji preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom zaključeno, da sta volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid za namene preiskave en sam izdelek.
No compelling argument was submitted which would justify a change in approach leading to a different conclusion to that reached in the previous review investigation.
Predložen ni bil noben prepričljiv argument, ki bi upravičil spremembo v pristopu, ki bi vodila do zaključka, drugačnega od tistega, ki je bil dosežen v teku prejšnje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom.
Moreover, there is no significant price difference on the market between fused tungsten carbide and tungsten carbide, because some additional processing for fused tungsten carbide is offset by a less refined selection of grain sizes.
Še več, med taljenim volframovim karbidom in volframovim karbidom na trgu ni nobene večje cenovne razlike, saj se dodatno procesiranje za taljeni volframov karbid izravna z manj prečiščeno izbiro velikosti zrn.
Therefore, tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide are to be considered a single product sharing the same basic characteristics for the purpose of this investigation.
Zato se za namene te preiskave volframov karbid in taljeni volframov karbid obravnavata kot en sam izdelek z enakimi osnovnimi lastnostmi.
As established in the previous investigations, this review investigation has confirmed that the products exported by the PRC and those manufactured and sold by the Community producers and by the producer in the analogue country were, because they have essentially the same physical characteristics and end uses, like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Ta preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je potrdila, kot je bilo ugotovljeno že v prejšnjih preiskavah, da so izdelki, ki jih izvaža LRK, in tisti, ki jih proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti ter proizvajalec v primerljivi državi, podobni izdelki v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe, ker imajo enake bistvene fizikalne lastnosti in končne uporabe.
As a general background, it is recalled that imports of the product concerned from the PRC during the 9-month IP of the investigation which led to the imposition of measures in 1990 were 117 tonnes, representing a market share of 5,3 %.
Kot splošno ozadje se poudarja, da je bil uvoz zadevnega izdelka iz LRK v času 9-mesečnega OP, ki je vodilo do uvedbe ukrepov leta 1990, 117 ton, kar je predstavljalo 5,3 % tržni delež.
The dumping margin found at that time was 73,13 %.
Stopnja dampinga takrat je bila 73,13 %.
In the IP of the previous review investigation, imports were 234 tonnes, representing a market share of 5 %, while the dumping margin was 30,6 %.
V OP prejšnje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom je bil uvoz 234 ton, kar je predstavljalo 5 % tržni delež, medtem ko je bila stopnja dampinga takrat 30,6 %.
Market Economy Status and Analogue country
Status tržnega gospodarstva in primerljiva država
It is recalled that none of the exporters of the product concerned obtained market economy status (‘MES’) in the previous investigations.
Poudariti je treba, da si v prejšnjih preiskavah noben izvoznik zadevnega izdelka ni pridobil statusa tržnega gospodarstva („STG“).
Cooperating exporters argued that the possibility of granting MES should be examined pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, stating that there are no provisions in the basic Regulation which prevent cooperating exporters being granted MES in a review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Sodelujoči izvozniki so dokazovali, da je možnost odobritve STG treba pregledati v skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe, saj v osnovni uredbi naj ne bi bilo nobenih določb, ki bi sodelujočim izvoznikom preprečevale odobritev STG v pregledu v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
It is recalled that the current investigation is an expiry review, following which measures can only be repealed or maintained, but not amended.
Poudariti je treba, da je trenutna preiskava pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, po kateri je ukrepe mogoče le razveljaviti ali ohraniti, ne pa tudi spremeniti.
In line with the consistent practice of the Institutions, claims for MES are therefore to be addressed in the context of interim reviews because as a result of such interim review the level of measures may be changed.
V skladu z običajno prakso institucij je zahtevke za STG zato treba obravnavati v okviru vmesnih pregledov, saj je na podlagi takšnih vmesnih pregledov možno spremeniti stopnjo ukrepov.
The cooperating exporters also questioned the use of the United States of America as an appropriate market economy third country (‘analogue country’), referring to the difference in GDP per capita between the PRC and United States of America as a reason for its inappropriateness.
Sodelujoči izvozniki so podvomili tudi v uporabo Združenih držav Amerike kot primerne tretje države s tržnim gospodarstvom („primerljiva država“), pri tem pa so se sklicevali na razliko v BDP na prebivalca med LRK in Združenimi državami Amerike kot glavni vzrok za neprimernost.
Instead, the cooperating exporters proposed the use of the Republic of Korea or the Czech Republic, on the grounds that the GDP per capita was more in line with the level of GDP in the PRC.
Sodelujoči izvozniki so namesto tega predlagali uporabo Republike Koreje ali Češke republike, saj naj bi bila raven BDP na prebivalca v teh dveh državah bližje ravni BDP na prebivalca v LRK.
The issue of GDP per capita alone is not considered as a determinative factor in deciding upon a suitable analogue country.
Vprašanje BDP na prebivalca samo po sebi ni odločujoči dejavnik pri odločitvi o primerni primerljivi državi.
The United States of America was found to be an appropriate analogue country in the previous review investigation and no change of circumstances was identified which would make its use inappropriate in the current investigation.
Prejšnja preiskava v zvezi s pregledom je pokazala, da so Združene države Amerike primerna primerljiva država, in v trenutni preiskavi ni bila odkrita nobena sprememba v okoliščinah, ki bi pomenila, da je uporaba Združenih držav Amerike neprimerna.
Moreover, no convincing evidence was provided showing that the Republic of Korea or the Czech Republic would be more suitable.
Poleg tega niso bili predloženi nikakršni prepričljivi dokazi, da sta Republika Koreja ali Češka republika bolj primerni.
Osram Sylvania Inc., a producer of the product concerned in the United States of America, had offered to cooperate in the investigation and it was accordingly examined whether the domestic sales of Osram Sylvania Inc. were significant in comparison to the volume of the product concerned exported from the PRC.
Osram Sylvania Inc., proizvajalec zadevnega izdelka v Združenih državah Amerike, je ponudil sodelovanje v preiskavi in tako se je preučilo, ali domača prodaja družbe Osram Sylvania Inc. pomembna v primerjavi s količino zadevnega izdelka, ki je izvožena iz LRK.
It was found that the domestic sales by Osram Sylvania Inc to domestic customers, and in the ordinary course of trade, were made at volumes which considerably exceeded 5 % of the exports made by the Chinese exporters to the Community, as required if normal value is to be based on domestic sale prices.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da domača prodaja družbe Osram Sylvania Inc. domačim strankam in v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja dosega količine, ki precej presegajo 5 % izvoza kitajskih izvoznikov v Skupnost, kar je zahtevano, če naj normalna vrednost temelji na domačih prodajnih cenah.
Hence, pursuant to Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, it was decided to maintain the United States of America as the analogue country in the present proceeding and to use the domestic sales by Osram Sylvania Inc. as the basis for establishing the normal value.
Zato je bil v skladu s členom 2(7)(a) osnovne uredbe odločeno, da se Združene države Amerike ohranijo kot primerljiva država v tem postopku in da se domača prodaja družbe Osram Sylvania Inc. uporablja kot osnova za določitev normalne vrednosti.
It was examined whether the domestic sales of Osram Sylvania Inc. to independent customers could be considered to have been made in the ordinary course of trade, pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Preučeno je bilo, ali je domačo prodajo družbe Osram Sylvania Inc. neodvisnim strankam mogoče obravnavati kot prodajo v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja, v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
It was found that the weighted average selling price of all sales during the IP was higher than the weighted average unit cost of production.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena vse prodaje v OP višja, kot so bili tehtani povprečni stroški proizvodnje na enoto.
Therefore, all domestic sales were regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade.
Zato je bila celotna domača prodaja obravnavana kot prodaja v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja.
In accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation, normal value was based on the prices of all Osram Sylvania Inc.'s domestic sales of tungsten carbide and fused tungsten carbide to independent customers in the United States of America during the IP.
Normalna vrednost je v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe temeljila na cenah celotne domače prodaje volframovega karbida in taljenega volframovega karbida družbe Osram Sylvania Inc. neodvisnim strankam v Združenih državah Amerike v OP.
Five of the seven cooperating exporters accounted for almost all exports from the PRC to independent customers in the Community during the IP.
Pet od sedmih sodelujočih izvoznikov je v OP predstavljalo skoraj ves izvoz iz LRK neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
The other two cooperating exporters did not export the product concerned to the Community during the IP.
Ostala dva sodelujoča izvoznika v OP zadevnega izdelka nista izvažala v Skupnost.
The export price could therefore be established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation (i.e. on the basis of the prices actually charged by the five cooperating exporters).
Izvozno ceno je zato mogoče določiti v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe (tj. na podlagi cen, ki jih je pet sodelujočih izvoznikov dejansko zaračunavalo).
To achieve a fair comparison, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, adjustments were made for differences in respect of transport, packaging, insurance, credit costs, payment terms, handling and ancillary costs, which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Da bi dosegli pravično primerjavo v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe, so bile narejene prilagoditve za razlike v zneskih prevoza, pakiranja, zavarovanja, kreditnih stroškov, plačilnih pogojev, manipulativnih stroškov in drugih stroškov, ki so bili plačani in so dokazano vplivali na cene in cenovno primerljivost.
In accordance with Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the normal value was compared to the export price.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe se je normalno vrednost primerjalo z izvozno ceno.
Both were calculated on an ex-factory basis, and the comparison was made at the same level of trade.
Obe sta bili izračunani na podlagi cene franko tovarna, primerjava pa je bila izvedena na enaki stopnji trgovanja.
In order to calculate the dumping margin, the weighted average normal value was compared to the weighted average export price to the Community at ex-factory level and at the same level of trade.
Da bi izračunali stopnjo dampinga, se je tehtano povprečno normalno vrednost primerjalo s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno v Skupnost na stopnji franko tovarna in na enaki stopnji trgovanja.
This comparison showed the existence of dumping at a level of around 31 % which is close to the current level of anti-dumping duty.
Ta primerjava je pokazala obstoj dampinga na stopnji okrog 31 %, kar je blizu trenutni stopnji protidampinške dajatve.
As dumping had not stopped, it was examined whether there is a likelihood of continuation of exports of the product concerned at dumped prices.
Ker se z dampingom ni prenehalo, je bilo preučeno, ali obstaja verjetnost, da se bo nadaljeval izvoz zadevnega izdelka po dampinških cenah.
In this context, factors such as the production capacity of producers of the product concerned in the PRC and their sales prices to other third countries and on the domestic market in the PRC were taken into account.
V okviru tega so bili upoštevani dejavniki, kot npr. proizvodna zmogljivost proizvajalcev zadevnega izdelka v LRK in njihove prodajne cene drugim tretjim državam ter na domačem trgu v LRK.
Spare production capacity
Prosta proizvodna zmogljivost
As mentioned in recital (31), there were five cooperating exporters in the PRC that exported the product concerned to the Community during the IP.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 31, je bilo v OP pet sodelujočih izvoznikov v LRK, ki so zadevni izdelek izvažali v Skupnost.
Two of these exporters produced the product concerned themselves, i.e. the production and export sales occurred in the same legal entity.
Dva od teh izvoznikov sta zadevni izdelek proizvajala sama, tj. proizvodno prodajo in izvozno prodajo je izvajal en sam pravni subjekt.
Two other exporters were each related to production companies, i.e. production and export sales occurred in two separate but related legal entities.
Dva druga izvoznika sta bila vsak zase povezana s proizvodnimi družbami, tj. proizvodno in izvozno prodajo sta izvajali dva ločena, a povezana pravna subjekta.
The fifth exporter had no related production company; its products were instead purchased from the producers/exporters mentioned under recitals (37) and (38), and thereafter exported.
Peti izvoznik ni bil povezan z nobeno proizvodno družbo; namesto tega je svoje izdelke kupoval od proizvajalcev/izvoznikov, omenjenih v uvodnih izjavah 37 in 38, ter jih nato izvažal.
The four exporters with a production facility had a combined theoretical [10] capacity of 9850 tonnes during the IP and total production of 8460 tonnes, which represented a utilisation rate of 86 %.
Štirje izvozniki s proizvodnimi obrati so imeli v OP skupno teoretično [10] zmogljivost 9850 ton in skupno proizvodnjo 8460 ton, kar je predstavljalo 86 % stopnjo izkoriščenosti.
The four producing exporters therefore have spare production capacity of 1390 tonnes, which is equivalent to 21,5 % of the calculated consumption of the product concerned for the free market (6461 tonnes) [11].
Štirje proizvodni izvozniki imajo zato prosto proizvodno zmogljivost 1390 ton, kar je enako 21,5 % izračunane porabe zadevnega izdelka za prosti trg (6461 ton) [11].
The two other cooperating exporters which did not export the product concerned to the Community during the IP also submitted information on their production and sales during the IP.
Tudi dva ostala sodelujoča izvoznika, ki v OP nista izvažala zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost, sta predložila informacije o svoji proizvodnji in prodaji v OP.
One of these two exporters was a trader without own production, the other had its own production capacity, with a production capacity of approximately 200 tonnes and an actual production during the IP of 49 tonnes.
Eden od teh dveh izvoznikov je bil trgovec brez lastne proizvodnje, drugi je imel svojo proizvodno zmogljivost, s proizvodno zmogljivostjo približno 200 ton in dejansko proizvodnjo 49 ton v OP.
The combined capacity of the seven exporters amounted to 10050 tonnes.
Skupna zmogljivost sedmih izvoznikov je znašala 10050 ton.
The seven exporters had spare production capacity of 1541 tonnes during the IP, representing approximately 24 % of free market consumption in the Community as defined in recital (41) above.
Sedem izvoznikov je imelo v OP prosto proizvodno zmogljivost 1541 ton, kar je predstavljalo približno 24 % porabe prostega trga v Skupnosti, kot je opredeljena v uvodni izjavi 41.
This spare capacity is a clear indication that Chinese exporters could opt for a substantial increase of their exports of the product concerned to the Community market if measures were repealed.
Ta prosta zmogljivost je jasen znak, da bi se kitajski izvozniki lahko odločili za precejšnje povečanje svojega izvoza zadevnega izdelka na trg Skupnosti, če bi ukrepe razveljavili.
It is recalled that the total exports of the cooperating exporters amounted to 239 tonnes, or close to 100 % of the total imports of the product concerned during the IP, and that the cooperating exporters therefore account for almost all exports to the Community.
Poudariti je treba, da je skupni izvoz sodelujočih izvoznikov v OP znašal 239 ton ali blizu 100 % skupnega uvoza zadevnega izdelka in da sodelujoči izvozniki zato predstavljajo skoraj ves izvoz v Skupnost.
Sales by PRC exporters on the domestic market and on markets of third countries
Prodaja izvoznikov LRK na domači trg in na trge tretjih držav
Since the imposition of the existing measures, the Chinese exporters have developed their competence in downstream utilisation of the product concerned, mainly for the tool industry (derived from cemented carbides).
Kitajski izvozniki so od uvedbe obstoječih ukrepov razvili svojo usposobljenost za uporabo zadevnega izdelka navzdol v proizvodni verigi, še posebej v orodjarski industriji (ki temelji na cementnih karbidih).
During the IP, approximately 4846 tonnes (57 %) of total production by the five cooperating exporters were further processed, whilst 1557 tonnes (18 %) were sold on the domestic market, and 2021 tonnes (24 %) were exported through the cooperating exporters.
V OP je bilo približno 4846 ton (57 %) skupne proizvodnje petih sodelujočih izvoznikov nadalje predelanih, medtem ko je bilo 1557 ton (18 %) prodanih na domačem trgu in 2021 ton (24 %) izvoženih preko sodelujočih izvoznikov.
The table below shows the average sales price by destination by the five cooperating exporters during the IP, and a comparison with the average sales price of the Community Industry:
Spodnja tabela prikazuje povprečne prodajne cene petih sodelujočih izvoznikov po destinacijah v OP in primerjavo s povprečnimi prodajnimi cenami industrije Skupnosti.
Average Sales Price/kg (EUR) (CIF)
Povprečna prodajna cena/kg (EUR) (CIF)
Compared with the Average Sales Price of the Community Industry in the Community
Primerjava s povprečno prodajno ceno industrije Skupnosti v Skupnosti
Domestic Sales
Domača prodaja
34 %– y in the Community
34 %– upnosti
Export sales to Japan
Izvozna prodaja na Japonsko
20 %– y in the Community
20 %– upnosti
Export sales to United States of America
Izvozna prodaja v Združene države Amerike
16 %– y in the Community
16 %– upnosti
Export sales to other countries in Southeast Asia
Izvozna prodaja v druge države v jugovzhodni Aziji
17 %– y in the Community
17 %– upnosti
Export sales to European Community
Izvozna prodaja v Evropsko skupnost
Export sales to other destinations
Izvozna prodaja v druge destinacije
18 %– y in the Community
18 %– upnosti
As seen above, Chinese exporters would have all interest in not only using their existing spare capacity to increase sales to the Community market, but also in shifting at least part of their domestic sales and sales to third countries to the Community market.
Kot je razvidno, bi bili kitajski izvozniki zelo zainteresirani ne le za uporabo svojih obstoječih prostih zmogljivosti za povečanje prodaje na trgu Skupnosti, ampak tudi za premik vsaj dela svoje domače prodaje in prodaje tretjim državam na trg Skupnosti.
Indeed, in comparison to the prices that the cooperating exporters could charge on their domestic market, the prices on the Community market would make it a very attractive market, if the existing anti-dumping measures were allowed to expire.
V primerjavi s cenami, ki jih sodelujoči izvozniki zaračunajo na svojem domačem trgu, bi zaradi cen na trgu Skupnosti le-ta postal zelo privlačen, če bi dopustili, da se obstoječi protidampinški ukrepi iztečejo.