natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(4) its commitment to make full use of the mechanisms of the CETA Committee on Geographical Indications so as to ensure that Canadian consumers are adequately informed about the intrinsic quality and characteristics of the products covered under CETA Agreement Art 20.21., (5) its commitment, within five (5) years from the entry into force of the CETA Agreement, to use the appropriate mechanisms, with a view to achieving for all EU GI's therein, including PDO ‘Feta’, the same level of protection, (6) support Greece in its efforts to promote GIs by exploiting the possibilities offered under Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014.
Grčija namerava spremljati izvajanje navedenih točk, ki jih razume kot izkaz dobre vere pri izvajanju sporazuma CETA.
Greece intends to follow up on the above points and considers them as part of the good faith in the implementation of the CETA Agreement.
Ob predložitvi te izjave je Grčija v celoti upoštevala strateške politične in ekonomske vidike sporazuma CETA.
In presenting this statement, Greece has taken fully into consideration the strategic political and economic dimension of the CETA Agreement.
Obseg začasne uporabe sporazuma CETA
Regarding the scope of provisional application of CETA:
Izjava Sveta
Statement from the Council:
Svet Evropske unije potrjuje, da bo začasna uporaba veljala le za zadeve, ki sodijo v okvir pristojnosti EU.
The Council of the European Union confirms that only matters within the scope of EU competence will be subject to provisional application.
Izjava Sveta o začasni uporabi določb o vzajemnem priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij
Statement from the Council relevant to the provisional application of mutual recognition of professional qualifications:
Svet Evropske unije izjavlja, da njegov sklep, kolikor določa začasno uporabo določb s področja vzajemnega priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij, ki sodijo v področje uporabe deljenih pristojnosti med EU in državami članicami, s strani EU, ne vpliva na delitev pristojnosti med njimi na tem področju in državam članicam ne preprečuje izvajanja njihovih pristojnosti s Kanado ali z drugo tretjo državo v zadevah, ki niso zajete v ta sporazum.
The Council of the European Union declares that its decision, to the extent that it provides for provisional application by the EU of provisions in the area of mutual recognition of professional qualifications and to the extent that this area falls within the scope of shared competences between the EU and the Member States, does not prejudge the allocation of competences between them in this area and does not prevent the Member States from exercising their competences with Canada or with another third country for matters that would not be covered by this Agreement.
Izjava Sveta o začasni uporabi določb o zaščiti delavcev
Statement from the Council relevant to the provisional application of protection of workers:
Svet Evropske unije izjavlja, da njegov sklep, kolikor določa začasno uporabo določb s področja zaščite delavcev, ki sodijo v področje uporabe deljenih pristojnosti med EU in državami članicami, s strani EU, ne vpliva na delitev pristojnosti med njimi na tem področju in državam članicam ne preprečuje izvajanja njihovih pristojnosti s Kanado ali z drugo tretjo državo v zadevah, ki niso zajete v ta sporazum.
The Council of the European Union declares that its decision, to the extent that it provides for provisional application by the EU of provisions in the area of protection of workers and to the extent that this area falls within the scope of shared competences between the EU and the Member States, does not prejudge the allocation of competences between them in this area and does not prevent the Member States from exercising their competences with Canada or with another third country for matters that would not be covered by this Agreement.
Odločitve Skupnega odbora CETA
Regarding decisions of the CETA Joint Committee:
Izjava Komisije
Commission declaration:
Opozoriti je treba, da ni verjetno, da bo v bližnji prihodnosti potrebna kakršna koli odločitev o spremembi sporazuma CETA in kakršna koli zavezujoča razlaga navedenega sporazuma s strani Skupnega odbora CETA.
It is noted that it is unlikely that any decision amending CETA and any binding interpretation of CETA adopted by the CETA Joint Committee will be required in the near future.
Zato Komisija ne namerava predložiti nobenega predloga v skladu s členom 218(9) za spremembo sporazuma CETA ali za sprejetje zavezujoče razlage navedenega sporazuma, preden se zaključi postopek v glavni stvari pred nemškim ustavnim sodiščem.
Therefore the Commission does not intend to make any proposal under Article 218(9) with a view to amending CETA or with a view to adopting a binding interpretation of CETA before completion of the main proceedings before the German Constitutional Court.
Izjava Sveta in držav članic
Statement from the Council and the Member States:
Svet in države članice opozarjajo, da se v primeru, ko odločitev Skupnega odbora CETA sodi v pristojnost držav članic, stališče, ki ga zavzamejo Unija in njene države članice v okviru Skupnega odbora CETA, sprejme v medsebojnem soglasju.
The Council and the Member States recall that where a decision of the CETA Joint Committee falls within the competence of the Member States the position to be taken by the Union and its Member States within the CETA Joint Committee shall be adopted by common accord.
Prenehanje začasne uporabe sporazuma CETA
Regarding the termination of provisional application of CETA:
Če bo ratifikacija sporazuma CETA dokončno in nepreklicno zavrnjena zaradi odločitve ustavnega sodišča ali po končanju drugih ustavnih procesov in uradnem obvestilu vlade zadevne države, se sporazum mora nehati začasno uporabljati in se tudi bo prenehal uporabljati.
If the ratification of CETA fails permanently and definitively because of a ruling of a constitutional court, or following the completion of other constitutional processes and formal notification by the government of the concerned state, provisional application must be and will be terminated.
Potrebni ukrepi bodo sprejeti v skladu s postopki EU.
The necessary steps will be taken in accordance with EU procedures.
Izjava Nemčije in Avstrije
Statement by Germany and Austria:
Nemčija in Avstrija izjavljata, da lahko kot pogodbenici sporazuma CETA uveljavljata svoje pravice, ki izhajajo iz člena 30.7(3)(c) navedenega sporazuma.
Germany and Austria declare that as Parties to CETA they can exercise their rights which derive from Article 30.7(3)(c) of CETA.
Izjava Poljske
Statement by Poland:
Poljska izjavlja, da lahko kot pogodbenica sporazuma CETA uveljavlja svojo pravico, ki izhaja iz člena 30.7(3)(c) navedenega sporazuma.
Poland declares that as a Party to CETA it can exercise its right which derives from Article 30.7.(3)(c) of CETA.
Vsi potrebni ukrepi bodo sprejeti v skladu s postopki EU.
All necessary steps will be taken in accordance with the EU procedures.
Izjava Slovenije
Statement by Slovenia:
Republika Slovenija ob opozarjanju na zelo občutljivo naravo poglavja o naložbah meni, da soglasje k podpisu sporazuma CETA ne prejudicira temeljnega stališča Republike Slovenije glede dvostranskega sistema sodišč za naložbe.
The Republic of Slovenia, while recalling the highly sensitive nature of the investment chapter, considers that the agreement to sign the CETA does not prejudice the principal position of the Republic of Slovenia on the bilateral investment court system.
Ob upoštevanju različnih pomislekov, izraženih med pogajanji o določbah glede sistema sodišča za naložbe, Republika Slovenija pričakuje, da se bo sistem sodišča za naložbe še naprej stalno razvijal v skladu s skupno razlagalno izjavo in pravom Evropske unije ter da se bodo zadevne določbe sporazuma CETA nadgradile z izboljšavami še pred ustanovitvijo večstranskega naložbenega sodišča in pritožbenega mehanizma za reševanje naložbenih sporov.
Considering the various concerns expressed during the negotiations on the investment court system provisions the Republic of Slovenia expects that the investment court system is continually further developed in line with the Joint Interpretative Declaration and the law of the European Union, and that the relevant provisions of CETA are adapted in order to introduce the improvements already before the multilateral investment tribunal and appellate mechanism for the resolution of investment disputes is established.
Na podlagi delitve pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami v skladu s Pogodbama sklep Sveta, s katerim se odobri začasna uporaba sporazuma CETA med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kanado na drugi strani, ne vpliva na samostojno odločanje Republike Slovenije o tem, ali bo zanjo zavezujoč v zvezi z zadevami, ki spadajo v njeno nacionalno pristojnost.
On the basis of the allocation of competences between the European Union and its Member States under the Treaties, the Decision of the Council that authorises the provisional application of the CETA between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Canada, of the other part, shall not affect the autonomy of the Republic of Slovenia to decide to be bound by it with regard to issues falling within its national competence.
To pomeni, da je treba sklicevanje na notranje zahteve in postopke, potrebne za njegovo začasno uporabo, v navedenem sporazumu v primeru Republike Slovenije razumeti kot sklicevanje na dokončanje ratifikacijskih postopkov.
That implies that reference in the said Agreement to internal requirements and procedures necessary for its provisional application is to be understood in the case of the Republic of Slovenia as referring to the completion of ratification procedures.
Republika Slovenija razume, da sporazum CETA ne bo vplival na zakonodajo Evropske unije ali Kanade glede postopka odobritve, dajanja na trg, gojenja in označevanja GSO in proizvodov, pridobljenih z novimi tehnikami žlahtnjenja, ter predvsem na možnost držav članic, da omejijo ali prepovejo gojenje GSO na svojem ozemlju.
The Republic of Slovenia understands that CETA will not affect the European Union or Canada legislation concerning the authorization, placing on the market, growing and labelling of GMOs and products obtained by new breeding technologies and in particular the possibility of the Member States to restrict or prohibit the growing of GMOs on their territory.
Poleg tega Republika Slovenija razume, da nič v sporazumu CETA ne bo preprečilo uporabe previdnostnega načela v Evropski uniji, kot je določeno v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije.
Additionally, the Republic of Slovenia understands that nothing in the CETA will prevent the application of the precautionary principle in the European Union as set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Kar zadeva vodo, Republika Slovenija razume, da ta sporazum z ničemer ne uvaja obveznosti za Evropsko unijo in njene države članice, ki bi presegale določbe EU zakonodaje ali omejevale pravice pogodbenic, da sprejmejo ali ohranijo kakršen koli ukrep za upravljanje, varovanje in ohranjanje svojih vodnih virov (bodisi za komercialno uporabo, pitno vodo, mešano ali drugačno uporabo), vključno s pravico pogodbenic do omejevanja ali odpovedi že podeljenih vodnih pravic.
In relation to water, the Republic of Slovenia understands that nothing in this agreement creates any obligation for the European Union and its Member States going beyond the EU legislation or limits the right of each Party to adopt or maintain any measure to manage, protect and preserve its water sources (being for commercial, drinking water, mixed or other use), including the right of each Party to limit or cancel the awarded water rights.
Republika Slovenija prav tako razume, da se za vodne vire, ki se uporabljajo za zagotavljanje pitne vode (tudi kadar se ti vodni viri uporabljajo tako za zagotavljanje pitne vode kot tudi za kakšen drug namen) tretji odstavek člena 1.9 ne uporablja.
The Republic of Slovenia also understands that water sources used for drinking water supply (including water sources used for both drinking water supply and any other use) are not covered by paragraph 3 of Article 1.9.
Izjava Avstrije
Statement by Austria:
Republika Avstrija opozarja, da se skuša doseči medinstitucionalni dogovor, s katerim naj bi se prek Sveta Evropske unije zagotovilo ustrezno sodelovanje držav članic pri sprejemanju odločitev o določitvi stališč, ki se v skladu s členom 218(9) PDEU zavzamejo v skupnem odboru, ustanovljenem s sporazumom.
The Republic of Austria notes that an interinstitutional agreement is being sought to ensure the appropriate involvement of the Member States, through the Council of the European Union, in decisions establishing the positions to be adopted on the Union's behalf in the Joint Committee set up by the Agreement, in accordance with Article 218(9) TFEU.
Za zagotovitev sodelovanja državnega zbora (Nationalrat) pri takšnih odločitvah opozarjamo na člen 23e ustave.
With regard to ensuring the participation of the Nationalrat in such decisions, we would refer to Article 23e of the Constitution.
Glede na delitev pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami, kot je določena v Pogodbah, je treba potrditi, da sklepi Sveta o odobritvi podpisa, začasni uporabi in sklenitvi Celovitega gospodarskega in trgovinskega sporazuma (CETA) med Kanado na eni strani ter Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani ne vplivajo na avtonomijo odločanja Republike Poljske o vprašanjih, ki so v njeni nacionalni pristojnosti; njena odločitev o sklenitvi sporazuma v skladu z načeli in ustavnimi določbami bo odvisna od končanja notranjih ratifikacijskih postopkov.
Considering the division of competences between the European Union and its Member States, as defined in the Treaties, it is to be stated that the decisions of the Council authorising the signature, provisional application and conclusion of The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States of the other part, do not affect the autonomy of decision of the Republic of Poland relating to the issues in the scope of national competence, whose decision on concluding the agreement, in accordance with the principles and constitutional provisions, depends on completion of the internal ratification procedures.
V sporazumu je pojem „naložba“ široko opredeljen.
The agreement contains a broad definition of ‘investment.’
Da bi pregnali dvome glede dogovorjene opredelitve tega pojma, Republika Poljska izjavlja, da ta koncept razume tako, kot da so pravno zaščitene samo „dejanske“ naložbe.
To avoid doubts as to the agreed wording of the definition of ‘investment’, the Republic of Poland declares its understanding that this concept includes into legal protection only ‘real’ investments.
V zvezi s tem Republika Poljska, prvič, za „dejanske“ naložbe, zaščitene v skladu s sporazumom CETA, šteje naložbe v fazi po ustanovitvi, tj. fazi, ko vlagatelj pridobi upravni sklep (dokončni/izvršljivi sklep, ki omogoča uresničitev pravice, podeljene z navedenim sklepom) ali druga dokončna/izvršljiva soglasja, določena z zakonom, če zakon določa, da je za naložbo potreben sklep ali soglasje.
As the ‘real’ investment, protected under the CETA agreement, the Republic of Poland considers firstly, an investment at the stage of post-establishment, understood as the stage of obtaining by the investor of an administrative decision (final/enforceable, that is, which allows to realise the right granted by the said decision), or other final/enforceable consents, required by law, if such a decision or consent is legally required for the investment.
Drugič, takšno odločbo ali soglasje mora izvršiti vlagatelj.
Secondly, such a decision or consent must be performed by the investor.
Tretjič, Republika Poljska kot dokaz za „dejansko“ naložbo razume to, da se za njeno izvršitev dejansko uporabi kapital ali druga sredstva.
Thirdly, the element to demonstrate that the investment is ‘real’, to the understanding of the Republic of Poland, is the actual involvement of capital or other funds in the implementation thereof.
Sporazum CETA uvaja sistem sodišča za naložbe.
CETA introduces the Investment Court System.
Republika Poljska si bo prizadevala za to, da se določijo natančna pravila za izbor sodnikov, tako da bo v sestavi sodišča odsevana raznolikost pravnih sistemov v Evropski uniji in upoštevana geografska uravnoteženost med državami članicami EU.
The Republic of Poland will seek to establish detailed rules for the selection of judges so that the composition of the court reflects the diversity of legal systems in the European Union and takes into account geographical balance among EU Member States.
V idealnem primeru bi moral biti izbran sodnik s temeljitim poznavanjem poljskega pravnega sistema.
An ideal solution would be selection of a judge with a deep knowledge of the Polish legal system.
Sporazum CETA pogodbenicam omogoča, da na svojem ozemlju določijo predpise, s katerimi bodo dosegle legitimne cilje politike.
The CETA agreement gives to its Parties the right to impose regulations within their territory to achieve legitimate policy objectives.
Republika Poljska izjavlja, da so zanjo upravičeni zlasti predpisi za zagotovitev visoke ravni varstva življenja in zdravja ljudi, vključno s pravičnimi delovnopravnimi pravili, zasebnostjo in varstvom podatkov, visoke ravni varstva za rastline in živali, varnosti in kakovosti hrane, varstva okolja in interesov potrošnikov, tudi na tako občutljivih področjih, kot sta dejanski nadzor in uporaba gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO).
The Republic of Poland declares that it considers as justified, in particular, the regulations to ensure a high level of protection of human life and health, including fair labour law rules, privacy and data protection, a high level of protection for plants and animals, food safety and quality, environment protection and consumer interests protection, including in such sensitive areas as the effective control and the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO).
V zvezi z GSO Republika Poljska meni, da sporazum CETA ne vpliva na veljavna pravila v EU ter da zagotavlja zaščito trgov EU in poljskega trga pred nezaželenim dotokom gensko spremenjenih izdelkov.
In relation to GMO, the Republic of Poland considers that CETA does not affect existing rules in the EU and guarantees the protection of the EU and Polish markets from unwanted influx of genetically modified products.
Republika Poljska je prepričana, da bo sporazum CETA z odpravo ovir in zmanjšanjem trgovinskih stroškov koristil najširšemu krogu naše družbe ter malim in srednjim podjetjem.
The Republic of Poland is convinced that CETA, through elimination of barriers and reduction of trade costs, will bring benefits to broadest groups of our society and to small and medium sized enterprises.
S sporazumom CETA se bo izboljšala kakovost življenja državljanov Poljske, ne da bi se znižali standardi EU.
While maintaining EU standards, CETA will contribute to improvement of the quality of life of Polish citizens.
Izjava Komisije o nadaljnji prepovedi uporabe snovi s hormonalnim delovanjem za spodbujanje rasti pri rejnih živalih (na primer hormonsko obdelano goveje meso)
Commission Declaration on the continuation of the prohibition of substances with a hormonal action for growth promotion in farm animals (such as hormone-treated beef):
Komisija potrjuje, da sporazum CETA v ničemer ne vpliva na zakonodajo Evropske unije o hormonsko obdelanem govejem mesu.
The European Commission confirms that no provision of the Agreement will in any way affect European Union legislation on hormone-treated beef.
Navedeni sporazum zlasti ne uvaja nobenih dodatnih obveznosti za Evropsko unijo, kar zadeva uvoz hormonsko obdelanega govejega mesa.
In particular, CETA does not contain any additional obligations on the European Union as regards the importation of hormone-treated beef.
Evropska unija bo lahko torej še naprej uporabljala veljavno zakonodajo o prepovedi uporabe snovi s hormonalnim delovanjem za spodbujanje rasti pri rejnih živalih (Direktiva 96/22/ES, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2003/74/ES), kar ji omogoča nadaljnjo prepoved proizvodnje ali uvoza mesa in proizvodov, pridobljenih iz živali, rejenih s takimi snovmi.
The European Union will therefore be free to continue to apply its existing legislation on the prohibition of substances having a hormonal action for growth promotion in farm animals (Directive 96/22/EC as amended by Directive 2003/74/EC) which permits it to continue to prohibit the production or import of meat and products provided from animals treated with such substances.
V zvezi s tem Komisija opozarja, da morajo imeti tretje države, ki imajo dovoljenje za izvoz mesa v EU in ki same dovoljujejo uporabo rastnih hormonov za domačo uporabo, vzpostavljene ločene proizvodne sisteme, da bi preprečile prisotnost prepovedanih snovi v mesu, izvoženem v EU.
In this context, the Commission recalls that third countries authorised to export meat to the EU, and that do allow the use of growth promotors for domestic use are obliged to have segregated production systems in place to ensure the absence of forbidden substances for meats exported to the EU.
Te sisteme je treba nadzirati v skladu z določbami zakonodaje EU (Direktiva 96/23/ES o ukrepih za spremljanje nekaterih snovi in njihovih ostankov v živih živalih in živalskih proizvodih).
These systems have to be supervised in accordance with provisions laid down in EU legislation (Directive 96/23/EC on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and products of animal origin).
Sporazum CETA teh zahtev ne spreminja.
CETA does not change any of these requirements.
Meso in sveže meso s poreklom iz tretjih držav, tudi iz Kanade, se sme uvoziti v Evropsko unijo le, če izpolnjuje vse uvozne pogoje Evropske unije, kar potrjuje veterinarsko spričevalo pristojnega organa države izvoznice, katerega zanesljivost za izdajo spričeval o skladnosti z uvoznimi zahtevami Evropske unije je uradno priznala Komisija.
Meat and fresh meat originating from third countries, including Canada, can only be imported into the European Union if they comply with all the European Union's import conditions, as attested by a veterinary certificate from the competent authority of the exporting country, whose reliability to certify compliance with the European Union's import requirements has been formally recognized by the Commission.
Izjava Komisije o javnem naročanju
Commission Declaration on Public Procurement:
Komisija potrjuje sposobnost naročnikov iz obeh pogodbenic, da v postopkih javnega naročanja uporabljajo okoljska, socialna ali z zaposlovanjem povezana merila in pogoje.
The Commission confirms the ability of procuring entities from both parties to apply environmental, social or employment-related criteria and conditions in their procurement procedures.
Države članice bodo še naprej lahko uporabljale možnost iz direktive EU o javnih naročilih (Direktiva 2014/24/EU z dne 26. februarja 2014, zlasti člena 67.2 in 70 direktive), da uporabljajo takšna merila in pogoje.
Member States will continue to be able to use the possibility provided for in the EU Public Procurement Directive (Directive 2014/24/EU of 26 February 2014, in particular it's Articles 67.2 and 70) to apply such criteria and conditions.
Poleg tega pogodbenice opozarjajo, da se v zvezi s subjekti na podcentralni ravni, kot so regije, občine in drugi lokalni subjekti, poglavje o naročilih uporablja samo za javna naročila blaga in storitev, katerih vrednost presega zgornjo mejo 200000 posebnih pravic črpanja (SDR) (glej Prilogo 19-2).
In addition, the Parties note that for sub-central entities such as regions, municipalities and other local entities, the procurement chapter applies only to procurement of goods and services above the value threshold of 200000 SDRs (cf.
V zvezi s tem obveznosti Evropske unije v sporazumu CETA ne presegajo njenih obveznosti znotraj STO v okviru Sporazuma o javnih naročilih, saj so zgornje meje v sporazumu CETA za javna naročila blaga in storitev enake kot v Sporazumu o javnih naročilih.