natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following a review investigation carried out in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation (‘review investigation’), the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005 [2] (‘the definitive Regulation’), imposed an anti-dumping duty of 38,8 % on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or non-alloy steel (‘SST’) originating in Croatia and an anti-dumping duty of 64,1 % for imports of SST originating in Ukraine with the exception of imports from Dnipropetrovsk Tube Works (‘DTW’) which is subject to an anti-dumping duty of 51,9 % (‘the existing measures’).
Po preiskavi v zvezi s pregledom, izvedeni v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe („preiskava v zvezi s pregledom“), je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/2005 [2] („končna uredba“) uvedel 38,8 % protidampinško dajatev na uvoz določenih brezšivnih cevi iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla („SST“) s poreklom iz Hrvaške in 64,1 % protidampinško dajatev na uvoz SST s poreklom iz Ukrajine, razen na uvoz iz Dnipropetrovsk Tube Works („DTW“), ki je zavezan 51,9 % protidampinški dajatvi („obstoječi ukrepi“).
The definitive Regulation amended definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Regulation (EC) No 348/2000 [3], as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1515/2002 [4] and repealed the possibility of exemption from the duties as provided for in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 348/2000 (‘original measures’).
Končna uredba je spremenila dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 348/2000 [3], kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1515/2002 [4] in razveljavila možnost oprostitve dajatev, kot je določeno v členu 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 348/2000 („prvotni ukrepi“).
MEASURES IN FORCE ON IMPORTS OF SST FROM ROMANIA AND RUSSIA
VELJAVNI UKREPI NA UVOZ SST IZ ROMUNIJE IN RUSIJE
By Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004 [8], it was decided to no longer apply the measures in force on imports of SST originating in Romania and Russia (‘the non-applied measures’) as a matter of prudence due to an anti-competitive behaviour of certain Community producers [9].
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 1322/2004 [8] je bilo določeno, da se iz previdnosti, da ne bi prišlo do protikonkurenčnega ravnanja nekaterih proizvajalcev iz Skupnosti [9], ukine uporaba veljavnih ukrepov na uvoz SST s poreklom iz Romunije in Rusije („ukrepi, ki se ne uporabljajo“).
EXAMINATION OF GROUNDS FOR SUSPENSION OF THE EXISTING MEASURES
PREISKAVA RAZLOGOV OPUSTITVE OBSTOJEČIH UKREPOV
Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation provides that, in the Community interest, anti-dumping measures may be suspended on the grounds that market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of such a suspension.
Člen 14(4) osnovne uredbe določa, da se protidampinški ukrepi v interesu Skupnosti lahko opustijo, če se tržne razmere spremenijo do te mere, da se škoda zaradi take opustitve zelo verjetno ne bi ponovila.
Article 14(4) further specifies that the anti-dumping measures concerned may be reinstated at any time if the reason for suspension is no longer applicable.
Člen 14(4) še natančneje določa, da se zadevni protidampinški ukrepi lahko kadar koli ponovno uvedejo, če razlogi za opustitev niso več veljavni.
The definitive Regulation takes account mainly of the situation between October 2001 and September 2002, i.e. the investigation period of that review investigation (‘review investigation period’).
Končna uredba pretežno upošteva položaj med oktobrom 2001 in septembrom 2002, tj. preiskovalnim obdobjem zadevne preiskave v zvezi s pregledom („obdobje preiskave v zvezi s pregledom“).
The review investigation leading to the definitive Regulation showed that imports from Ukraine and Croatia had, during the review investigation period, a significant market position.
Preiskava v zvezi s pregledom, ki je vodila do končne uredbe, je pokazala, da je imel uvoz iz Ukrajine in Hrvaške v obdobju preiskave v zvezi s pregledom pomemben tržni položaj.
They were still dumped and the injury margin had increased as compared to the original investigation.
Uvoz je bil še vedno dampinški in stopnja škode se je v primerjavi s prvotno preiskavo povečala.
On this basis, the review concluded that the original measures which were at a level of 23 % for Croatia and 38,5 % for Ukraine should be increased to reach their current level of 38,8 % for Croatia and 51,9 % and 64,1 % depending on the exporting producer concerned, for imports from Ukraine.
Na tej podlagi je preiskava zaključila, da je treba stopnjo prvotnih ukrepov s 23 % za Hrvaško in 38,5 % za Ukrajino dvigniti na trenutno stopnjo 38,8 % za Hrvaško in 51,9 % ter 64,1 %, glede na zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznika, za uvoz iz Ukrajine.
An examination of recent import flows reveals that in particular since the non-application of the measures on imports of SST from Russia and Romania, the situation on the Community market with respect to imports has changed, notably in that cumulated import flows from the aforesaid countries have increased, whereas at the same time cumulated imports from Croatia and Ukraine have significantly decreased to very low levels.
Pregled nedavnih uvoznih tokov je pokazal, da se je položaj na trgu Skupnosti v zvezi z uvozom še posebej od neuporabe ukrepov na uvoz SST iz Rusije in Romunije spremenil in sicer so se povečali skupni uvozni tokovi iz prej navedenih držav, medtem ko so skupni uvozni tokovi iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine znatno padli na nizko raven.
As long as the current market conditions prevail, Russian and Romanian imports are likely to maintain their strong presence and it would be unlikely that Ukrainian and/or Croatian imports would increase significantly.
Dokler prevladujejo trenutni tržni pogoji, bo uvoz iz Rusije in Romunije obdržal pomembno vlogo in ni pričakovati, da bi se uvoz iz Ukrajine in/ali Hrvaške pomembno povečal.
Therefore, it is considered that, in this specific situation, it is unlikely that injury to the Community industry would resume if the increase of the duty rates as provided for by the definitive Regulation would be suspended.
Zato se šteje, da v tem posebnem položaju ni verjetno, da bi se ponovila škoda industriji Skupnosti, če bi se opustila povečana stopnja dajatev določena v končni uredbi.
Consequently, and because of the special circumstances regarding, inter alia, the non-application of the measures on imports from Russia and Romania, it is considered that the duty levels of 23 % and 38,5 % established in the original investigation for Croatia and Ukraine respectively would be sufficient to eliminate injurious dumping.
Zato in zaradi posebnih okoliščin, med drugim, neuporabe ukrepov za uvoz iz Rusije in Romunije, se šteje, da sta stopnji dajatev 23 % za Hrvaško in 38,5 % za Ukrajino, določeni v prvotni preiskavi, zadostni za odstranitev škodljivega dampinga.
The Commission also notes that the current temporary change in market conditions does not warrant a complete suspension of measures applicable against Croatia and Ukraine.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da trenutna sprememba tržnih pogojev ne zagotavlja popolne opustitve ukrepov proti Hrvaški in Ukrajini.
Information collected in the review investigation concluded by the definitive Regulation demonstrates that Ukrainian and Croatian producers continue to have a considerable export potential so that they could easily increase exports to the Community market to an injurious level.
Podatki, zbrani med preiskavo v zvezi s pregledom, ki se je zaključila s končno uredbo, kažejo, da imajo ukrajinski in hrvaški proizvajalci še vedno znaten izvozni potencial in bi lahko zlahka povečali obseg izvoza v Skupnost do škodljive stopnje.
Thus, a full suspension of measures against imports from Croatia and Ukraine could also lead to similar import trends from these two countries as are currently experienced with regard to imports from Russia and Romania and would, therefore, in all likelihood lead to injury of the Community industry.
Zato bi popolna opustitev ukrepov za izvoz iz Hrvaške in Ukrajine lahko vodila do podobnih uvoznih trendov iz teh dveh držav, kot so trenutno v zvezi z uvozom iz Rusije in Romunije, in bi zato po vsej verjetnosti industriji Skupnosti povzročila škodo.
For the above reasons, it is concluded that the requirements permitting a partial suspension of the definitive Regulation, pursuant to Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation are met.
Zaradi navedenih razlogov se ugotavlja, da so zahteve, ki dovoljujejo delno opustitev končne uredbe, v skladu s členom 14(4) osnovne uredbe, izpolnjene.
Indeed, it is not in the interest of the Community to apply the increased duty levels provided for by the definitive Regulation as long as the duty levels set out in Regulation (EC) No 348/2000, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1515/2002 are sufficient.
Zato uporaba zvišanih stopenj dajatev, določenih s končno uredbo, ni v interesu Skupnosti, dokler sta stopnji dajatev določeni, v Uredbi (ES) št. 348/2000, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1515/2002, zadostni.
Accordingly, the application of the duty rates foreseen in the definitive Regulation should be partially suspended to the extent of the difference between the rates set in Article 1 of the definitive Regulation and those set in Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 348/2000.
V skladu s tem je treba uporabo stopenj dajatev, predvidenih v končni uredbi, delno opustiti, glede na razliko v stopnjah, določenih v členu 1 končne uredbe, in tistih, določenih v členu 1(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 348/2000.
Should the situation which led to the suspension change subsequently, the Commission may reinstate the anti-dumping measures by repealing the partial suspension of the anti-dumping duties forthwith.
Če se kasneje spremenijo okoliščine, ki so pripeljale do opustitve, lahko Komisija s preklicem opustitve protidampinških dajatev nemudoma ponovno vzpostavi protidampinške ukrepe.
CONSULTATION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
POSVETOVANJE Z INDUSTRIJO SKUPNOSTI
In accordance with the provisions of Article 14(4) of the basic Regulation the Commission informed the Community industry of its intention to partially suspend the anti-dumping measures and provided it with an opportunity to comment.
V skladu z določbami iz člena 14(4) osnovne uredbe je Komisija obvestila industrijo Skupnosti o nameravani delni opustitvi protidampinških ukrepov in ji dala možnost za pripombe.
The Community industry did not raise any objection.
Industrija Skupnosti ni ugovarjala –
The anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 258/2005 on imports of
Protidampinška dajatev, uvedena z Uredbo (ES) št. 258/2005 na uvoz
seamless pipes, of iron or non-alloy steel, of a kind used for oil and gas pipelines, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm (falling within CN codes 73041010 and 73041030);
brezšivnih cevi z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm, izdelanih iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, ki se uporabljajo za naftovode ali plinovode (ki sodijo v oznaki KN 73041010 in 73041030);
seamless pipes of circular cross-section, of iron or non-alloy steel, cold-drawn or cold-rolled (falling within CN code 73043199);
brezšivnih cevi okroglega prereza, iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, hladno vlečenih ali hladno valjanih (ki sodijo v oznako KN 73043199);
other tubes of circular cross-section, of iron or non-alloy steel, of an external diameter not exceeding 406,4 mm (falling within CN codes 73043991 and 73043993)
drugih cevi okroglega prereza, iz železa ali nelegiranega jekla, z zunanjim premerom do vključno 406,4 mm (ki sodijo v oznaki KN 73043991 in 73043993)
is hereby partially suspended as follows for a period of nine months:
se delno opusti za devet mesecev na sledeči način:
Rate of duty foreseen in Regulation (EC) No 258/2005
Stopnja dajatve, predvidene v Uredbi (ES) št. 258/2005
Rate of duty which is suspended
Stopnja dajatve, ki se opusti
Rate of duty which is not suspended
Stopnja dajatve, ki se ne opusti
TARIC additional code
Dodatna TARIC oznaka
All companies
Vsa podjetja
OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP), Dnipropretovsk, and CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant ‘Nikotube’, Nikopol
OJSC Nizhnedneprovsky Tube Rolling Plant (NTRP), Dnipropretrovsk in CJSC Nikopolsky seamless tubes plant „Nikotube“, Nikopol
See page 7 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 7 tega uradnega lista.
OJ L 228, 24.8.2002, p. 8.
UL L 228, 24.8.2002, str. 8.
OJ L 322, 25.11.1997, p. 1.
UL L 322, 25.11.1997, str. 1.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 235/2004 (OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 11).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 235/2004 (UL L 40, 12.2.2004, str. 11).
OJ L 246, 20.7.2004, p. 10.
UL L 246, 20.7.2004, str. 10.
See recital (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1322/2004.
Glej člen 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1322/2004.
By Regulation (EC) No 2320/97, anti-dumping duties were imposed on imports of SST originating, inter alia, in Romania and Russia [5].
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2320/97 so bile uvedene protidampinške dajatve na uvoz SST s poreklom iz, med drugim, Romunije in Rusije [5].
By Decisions 97/790/EC [6] and 2000/70/EC [7], undertakings were accepted from exporters in, inter alia, Romania and Russia.
S Sklepoma 97/790/ES [6] in 2000/70/ES [7] so bile sprejete zaveze izvoznikov v, med drugim, Romuniji in Rusiji.
abrogating the decision on the existence of an excessive deficit in Portugal
o razveljavitvi odločbe o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja na Portugalskem
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 104(12) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 104(12) Pogodbe,
By Council Decision 2002/923/EC [1], following a recommendation from the Commission in accordance with Article 104(6) of the Treaty, it was decided that an excessive deficit existed in Portugal.
Z Odločbo Sveta 2002/923/ES [1], na priporočilo Komisije in v skladu s členom 104(6) Pogodbe je bilo odločeno, da ima Portugalska čezmerni primanjkljaj.
In accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty, the Council made a Recommendation addressed to Portugal with a view to bringing the excessive deficit situation to an end [2].
V skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe je Svet na Portugalsko naslovil priporočilo z namenom, da se to stanje odpravi [2].
That Recommendation, in conjunction with Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit, procedure [3], established a deadline for the correction of the excessive deficit, which should be completed in the year following its identification, i.e. 2003 at the latest.
To priporočilo je v povezavi s členom 3(4) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [3] določilo končni rok za zmanjšanje čezmernega primanjkljaja, ki se mora doseči v letu, ki sledi letu njegove ugotovitve, t.j. najkasneje leta 2003.
In accordance with Article 104(12) of the Treaty, a Council decision on the existence of an excessive deficit is to be abrogated when the excessive deficit in the Member State concerned has, in the view of the Council, been corrected.
V skladu s členom 104(12) Pogodbe se odločba Sveta o obstoju čezmernega primanjkljaja razveljavi, če se je čezmerni primanjkljaj v zadevni državi članici po mnenju Sveta ustrezno zmanjšal.
The definitions of ‘government’ and ‘deficit’ are laid down in the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure by reference to the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts (ESA), second edition.
Opredelitvi pojmov „vlada“ in „primanjkljaj“ sta določeni v Protokolu o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, sklicujoč se na Evropski sistem integriranih gospodarskih računov (ESR), druga izdaja.
The data for the excessive deficit procedure are provided by the Commission.
Podatke za postopek v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem zagotovi Komisija.
Based on the data provided by the Commission after reporting by Portugal before 1 March 2004 in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community [4], and on the Commission Spring 2004 forecast, the following conclusions are warranted:
Na osnovi podatkov, ki jih priskrbi Komisija po poročanju Portugalske pred 1. marcem 2004 v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 3605/93 z dne 22. novembra 1993 o uporabi Protokola o postopku v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, ki je priloga k Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti [4], in na osnovi Spomladanske napovedi 2004 Komisije lahko oblikujemo naslednje zaključke:
The general government deficit is estimated at 2,8 % of GDP in 2003, compared with 2,7 % in 2002 and 4,4 % in 2001.
Javnofinančni primanjkljaj za leto 2003 se ocenjuje na 2,8 %, v primerjavi z 2,7 % v letu 2002 in 4,4 % v letu 2001.
The outcome for 2003 complied with the Council Recommendation issued under Article 104(7), particularly as regards the reduction of the government deficit below the reference value of 3 % of GDP by 2003 at the latest.
Rezultat za leto 2003 je skladen s priporočilom Sveta, izdanim na osnovi člena 104(7) zlasti glede zmanjšanja javnofinančnega primanjkljaja pod referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP najkasneje do leta 2003.
Fiscal adjustment was pursued in 2003 on the back of a sustained deceleration in the pace of total current primary expenditure growth from 8,9 % in 2001 to 7,8 % in 2002 and 4,1 % in 2003.
Davčna prilagoditev je bila izvedena leta 2003 na račun trajnega zaviranja trenutne hitrosti rasti osnovnih izdatkov z 8,9 % v letu 2001 na 7,8 % v letu 2002 in 4,1 % v letu 2003.
However, the current cyclical downturn, which ended in a recession in 2003, led to a significant deviation of 2,6 percentage points between the GDP growth outcome for the year and the initial budgetary projection.
Vendar pa je trenutni ciklični upad, ki se je končal z recesijo leta 2003, povzročil znatno odstopanje v višini 2,6 odstotne točke med dejansko letno rastjo BDP in začetno proračunsko napovedjo.
As a result, a massive shortfall in tax revenue developed during 2003, which had to be offset by the adoption of two one-off measures, together worth 2,1 % of GDP.
Posledično je v letu 2003 prišlo do obsežnega izpada davčnih prihodkov, kar je bilo treba nadomestiti s sprejemov dveh enkratnih ukrepov v skupni višini 2,1 % BDP.
The structural measures taken by the Portuguese authorities, having a more direct impact on public finances, fall mainly on three areas: (i) public administration; (ii) the healthcare sector; and (iii) education.
Strukturni ukrepi sprejeti s strani portugalskih organov, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na javne finance, sodijo večinoma v naslednja tri področja: (i) javna uprava; (ii) področje zdravstvenega varstva; in (iii) izobraževanje.
The difference can basically be accounted for by: (i) somewhat lower growth than assumed in the budget; (ii) base effects associated with the one-off measures taken in 2003; and (iii) the planned partial replacement so far of such one-off measures.
Do razlike je v osnovi prišlo zaradi: (i) nekoliko nižje rasti kot je bila pričakovana v proračunu; (ii) osnovnih učinkov v povezavi z enkratnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi leta 2003; in (iii) dosedanjih načrtovanih delnih nadomestil teh enkratnih ukrepov.
Therefore, additional measures are needed in order to prevent the government deficit from rising above the 3 % of GDP reference value in 2004 and following years.
Zato so potrebni dodati ukrepi za preprečevanje rasti javnofinančnega primanjkljaja nad referenčno vrednost 3 % BDP leta 2004 in v naslednjih letih.
After the cut-off date for the Commission Spring 2004 forecast, the Portuguese authorities made public their intention to carry out further (real-estate related) operations to allow the deficit to stay below 3 % of GDP in the current year.
Po zaključnem roku za Spomladansko napoved 2004 Komisije so portugalski organi objavili svojo namero, da izvedejo nadaljnje dejavnosti (v zvezi z nepremičninami), ki bodo omogočile, da primanjkljaj za tekoče leto ostane pod 3 % BDP.
According to the values reported in the first 2004 EDP notification, the government debt ratio was kept below the 60 % of GDP reference value in 2003, thereby in accordance with the Council Recommendation issued under Article 104(7), although it has steadily increased since 2001, and according to the Commission Spring 2004 forecast, is projected to exceed that value in 2004.
Glede na vrednosti, ki so bile sporočene v prvem uradnem obvestilu leta 2004 v okviru Postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem, je delež javnega dolga ostal pod referenčno vrednostjo 60 % BDP, torej v skladu s priporočilom Sveta iz člena 104(7), kljub temu, da je od leta 2001 stalno naraščal in je glede na Spomladansko napoved 2004 Komisije pričakovati, da bo leta 2004 presegel to vrednost.
Decision 2002/923/EC should therefore be abrogated.
Odločbo 2002/923/ES je zato treba razveljaviti.
However, in the light of the risks to the budgetary position highlighted by the Commission Spring 2004 forecast, it is of the utmost importance that the Portuguese authorities take the appropriate measures to ensure that the general government deficit remains below 3 % of GDP in 2004 and beyond.
Vendar je v luči tveganj glede proračunskega stanja, na katerega je opozorila Spomladanska napoved Komisije 2004, izredno pomembno, da portugalski organi ustrezno ukrepajo, da zagotovijo, da javnofinančni primanjkljaj v letu 2004 in naslednjih letih ostane pod 3 % BDP.
Given the continued sizeable negative output gap projected up to 2005, and in order to maintain the momentum of budgetary consolidation, recourse to further temporary measures is acceptable in the short-term.
Zaradi nadaljnje večje negativne vrzeli v proizvodnem rezultatu, ki se pričakuje do leta 2005, in z namenom ohraniti dinamiko proračunskega usklajevanja so kratkoročno dopustni nadaljnji začasni ukrepi.
In this regard, the Portuguese authorities should publicly confirm the measures planned and their respective amounts, until measures of a more structural nature exert their full exonerating effect on public finances.
V tej zvezi bi portugalski organi morali javno potrditi načrtovane ukrepe z navedbo njihovih ustreznih vrednosti, dokler ukrepi strukturne narave ne povzročijo polnega razbremenilnega učinka na javne finance.
For the consolidation to be sustained and in order to eventually achieve the medium-term objective of a budgetary position of close to balance or in surplus, in line with the broad economic policy guidelines, all one-off measures should be gradually replaced by measures of a more permanent nature, while the cyclically adjusted budgetary position should improve by at least 0,5 of a percentage point of GDP per year,
Da bi bila uskladitev trajna in da bi v skladu s širšimi smernicami ekonomske politike nazadnje dosegli ravnovesje ali presežek proračunskega stanja, bi bilo treba vse enkratne ukrepe postopoma nadomestiti s stalnimi ukrepi, medtem ko bi se moralo ciklično popravljeno proračunsko stanje izboljšati letno vsaj za 0,5 odstotne točke BDP –
From an overall assessment it follows that the correction of the excessive deficit situation in Portugal was completed in 2003, under the terms of the Recommendation addressed to Portugal on 5 November 2002 in accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty.
Iz celovite ocene sledi, da se je položaj čezmernega primanjkljaja na Portugalskem zmanjšal, kar je bilo doseženo leta 2003, pod pogoji, ki jih določa priporočilo, naslovljeno na Portugalsko 5. novembra 2002, v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe.
Decision 2002/923/EC is hereby abrogated.
Odločba 2002/923/ES se razveljavi.
OJ L 322, 27.11.2002, p. 30.
UL L 322, 27.11.2002, str. 30.
Council Recommendation of 5 November 2002.
Priporočilo Sveta z dne 5. novembra 2002.
OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 6.
UL L 209, 2.8.1997, str. 6.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 351/2002 (OJ L 55, 26.2.2002, p. 23).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 351/2002 (UL L 55, 26.2.2002, str. 23).