natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The statement will be sent to the Commission before 5 January of the following year.
Poročilo bo poslano Komisiji pred 5. januarjem naslednjega leta.
C MODALITIES FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE FINANCIAL COMPENSATION REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 11 OF THE PROTOCOL
NAČINI PLAČILA FINANČNEGA NADOMESTILA, NAVEDENEGA V ČLENU 11 PROTOKOLA
Referring to Article 11(1) of the Protocol, the financial compensation shall be payable annually at the beginning of each fishing year.
Ob sklicevanju na člen 11(1) Protokola se finančno nadomestilo plačuje letno na začetku vsakega ribolovnega leta.
Referring to Article 11(5) of the Protocol, the financial compensation is, with the revision, composed of two segments: the EC financial compensation and the shipowners licence fees.
Ob sklicevanju na člen 11(5) Protokola je finančno nadomestilo z revizijo sestavljeno iz dveh delov: finančno nadomestilo ES in licenčnina lastnikov ladij.
The amounts expected to be obtained by Greenland through licence fees paid by shipowners will be deducted from the EC financial compensation.
Zneski, ki naj bi jih Grenlandija dobila z licenčninami s strani lastnikov ladij, se bodo odšteli od finančnega nadomestila ES.
Following the end of the fishing year, the amount paid by the shipowners is examined and the balance between the result of full utilisation and payment of licence fees is transferred to the Greenland Authorities as soon as possible, in addition to the next year’s EC financial compensation.
Po koncu ribolovnega leta se pregleda znesek, ki so ga plačali lastniki ladij, ter se razliko med rezultatom polne uporabe in plačilom licenčnin čimprej pošlje organom Grenlandije poleg finančnega nadomestila ES za prihodnja leta.
D DATE OF ENTRY INTO FORCE
DATUM ZAČETKA VELJAVNOSTI
This administrative arrangement shall enter into force on 1 January 2005.
Ta upravni dogovor začne veljati 1. januarja 2005.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2141/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2141/2004
laying down, for the 2004/2005 marketing year, the revised production estimate for unginned cotton and the resulting new provisional reduction in the guide price
o določitvi predvidene proizvodnje neprečiščenega bombaža in novega začasnega znižanja normirane cene, ki izhaja iz nje, za tržno leto 2004/2005
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton [2], and in particular the second indent of Article 19(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1051/2001 z dne 22. maja 2001 o proizvodni pomoči za bombaž [2] in zlasti druge alinee člena 19(2) Uredbe,
Article 16(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001 of 2 August 2001 laying down detailed rules for applying the cotton aid scheme [3] provides that the revised production estimate for unginned cotton referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 and the resulting new provisional reduction in the guide price are to be established before 1 December of the marketing year concerned.
Člen 16(2) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1591/2001 z dne 2. avgusta 2001 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo programa pomoči za bombaž [3] določa, da se predvidena proizvodnja neprečiščenega bombaža iz drugega pododstavka člena 14(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1051/2001 in novo začasno znižanje normirane cene, ki izhaja iz nje, določita pred 1. decembrom v zadevnem tržnem letu.
Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 provides that the revised production estimate is to be established taking account of the progress of the harvest.
Člen 19(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1051/2001 določa, da se predvidena proizvodnja določi ob upoštevanju kvalitete letine.
That revised estimate should therefore be fixed on the basis of data available for the 2004/2005 marketing year.
Zato je treba določiti omenjeno predvideno proizvodnjo na osnovi podatkov za tržno leto 2004/2005.
The second subparagraph of Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 provides that from 16 December following the start of the marketing year, the amount of the advance is to be determined based on the revised production estimate, plus at least 7,5 %.
Drugi pododstavek člena 14(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1051/2001 določa, da se od 16. decembra po začetku tržnega leta znesek predplačila določi na osnovi predvidene proizvodnje, povečane za najmanj 7,5 %.
In view of the most recent figures on quantities placed in supervised storage notified by the Member States in accordance with Article 15(4)(c)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 1591/2001 and of uncertainty about the situation with regard to Greek production, as a safety margin, a percentage increase of 12 % for Greece and 7,5 % for Spain and Portugal should be applied for the 2004/2005 marketing year.
Ob upoštevanju najnovejšega stanja količin pod nadzorom, o katerem za tržno leto 2004/2005 poročajo države članice v skladu s členom 15(4)(c)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 1591/2001, in ob upoštevanju negotovosti glede grške proizvodnje je treba kot varnostni dodatek uporabiti odstotek povečanja 12 % za Grčijo, 7,5 % za Španijo in Portugalsko.
The new provisional reduction in the guide price must be calculated in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001, but replacing actual production by the revised production estimate increased as above.
Novo začasno znižanje normirane cene se izračuna v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1051/2001, vendar ob zamenjavi dejanske proizvodnje s predvideno povečano proizvodnjo.
For the 2004/2005 marketing year, the revised production estimate for unginned cotton is hereby set at:
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 se predvidena proizvodnja neprečiščenega bombaža določi na:
1103000 tonnes for Greece,
1103000 ton za Grčijo,
344640 tonnes for Spain,
344640 ton za Španijo,
926 tonnes for Portugal.
926 ton za Portugalsko.
For the 2004/2005 marketing year, the new provisional reduction in the guide price shall be:
Za tržno leto 2004/2005 se novo začasno znižanje normirane cene določi na:
EUR 39437/100kg for Greece,
39,437 EUR/100 kg za Grčijo,
EUR 27957/100 kg for Spain,
27,957 EUR/100 kg za Španijo,
EUR 0/100 kg for Portugal.
0 EUR/100 kg za Portugalsko.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1486/2002 (UL L 223, 20.8.2002, str. 3).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2142/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2142/2004
fixing the import duties in the cereals sector applicable from 16 December 2004
o določitvi uvoznih dajatev za žita, ki se uporabljajo od 16. decembra 2004
Import duties for the products covered by Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 applicable from 16 December 2004
Uvozne dajatve za proizvode iz člena 10(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/2003, v uporabi od 16. decembra 2004
period from 1.12.2004-14.12.2004
obdobje od 1.12.2004-14.12.2004
Freight/cost: Gulf of Mexico–Rotterdam: 35,18 EUR/t; Great Lakes–Rotterdam: 46,26 EUR/t.
Prevoz/stroški: Mehiški zaliv–Rotterdam: 35,18 EUR/t; Velika jezera–Rotterdam: 46,26 EUR/t.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2143/2004
amending Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of cotton-type bedlinen originating in India
o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the ‘basic Regulation’),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“),
Having regard to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 of 13 January 2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of cotton-type bedlinen originating in India [2],
ob upoštevanju člena 2 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 74/2004 z dne 13. januarja 2004 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije [2],
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je dala Komisija po posvetovanju s Svetovalnim odborom,
By Regulation (EC) No 74/2004, the Council imposed a definitive countervailing duty on imports into the Community of cotton-type bedlinen falling within CN codes ex63022100 (TARIC codes 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (TARIC code 6302229019), ex63023110 (TARIC code 6302311090), ex63023190 (TARIC code 6302319090) and ex63023290 (TARIC code 6302329019), originating in India.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 74/2004 uvedel dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost pod oznako KN ex63022100 (oznaki TARIC 6302210081, 6302210089), ex63022290 (oznaka TARIC 6302229019), ex63023110 (oznaka TARIC 6302311090), ex63023190 (oznaka TARIC 6302319090) in ex63023290 (oznaka TARIC 6302329019).
Given the large number of cooperating parties, a sample of Indian exporting producers was selected and individual duty rates ranging from 4,4 % to 10,4 % were imposed on the companies included in the sample, while other cooperating companies not included in the sample were attributed a duty rate of 7,6 %.
Zaradi velikega števila sodelujočih je bil izbran vzorec indijskih izvoznikov – proizvajalcev, podjetjem, vključenim v vzorec, pa je bila določena individualna stopnja dajatve v okviru od 4,4 % do 10,4 %, medtem ko je bila drugim podjetjem, ki niso bila vključena v vzorec, določena stopnja dajatve 7,6 %.
A duty rate of 10,4 % was imposed on companies which either did not make themselves known or did not cooperate with the investigation.
Stopnja dajatve 10,4 % je bila dodeljena podjetjem, ki se niso javila ali niso sodelovala v preiskavi.
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 stipulates that where any new exporting producer in India provides sufficient evidence to the Commission that it did not export to the Community the products described in Article 1(1) during the investigation period (1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002) (the ‘first criterion’) and it is not related to any of the exporters or producers in India which are subject to the anti-subsidy measures imposed by that Regulation (the ‘second criterion’), and it has actually exported to the Community the products concerned after the investigation period on which the measures are based, or it has entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export a significant quantity to the Community (the ‘third criterion’), then Article 1(3) of that Regulation can be amended by granting the new exporting producer the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample, i.e. 7,6 %.
Člen 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 določa, da če kateri koli nov izvoznik – proizvajalec v Indiji zagotovi zadostna dokazila Komisiji, da v Skupnost ni izvozil proizvodov iz člena 1(1) v obdobju preiskave (od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002) („prvi pogoj“); in ni v povezavi s katerim koli izvoznikom ali proizvajalcem v Indiji, na katerega se nanašajo protisubvencijska merila, ki jih uvaja Uredba („drugi pogoj“); in je dejansko izvozil v Skupnost zadevne proizvode po obdobju preiskave, na kateri temeljijo ukrepi, ali je prevzel nepreklicno pogodbeno dolžnost za izvoz precejšnje količine v Skupnost („tretji pogoj“); potem se člen 1(3) te uredbe lahko spremeni, če se novim izvoznikom – proizvajalcem zagotovi stopnja dajatve, primerna za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso vključena v vzorec, to je 7,6 %.
NEW EXPORTERS/PRODUCERS' REQUESTS
ZAHTEVA NOVIH IZVOZNIKOV/PROIZVAJALCEV
Twenty-four Indian companies have applied not to be treated differently from the companies which cooperated in the original investigation but were not included in the sample (‘newcomer status’).
Štiriindvajset indijskih podjetij je zaprosilo za enako obravnavo kot podjetja, ki so sodelovala pri prvotni preiskavi, vendar niso bila vključena v vzorec („status novinca“).
Two Indian companies requesting the newcomer status did not provide a questionnaire reply.
Dve indijski podjetji, ki sta zaprosili za status novinca, nista predložili izpolnjenega vprašalnika.
It was therefore not possible to verify whether these companies fulfilled the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004, and their request had to be rejected.
Zato ni bilo mogoče preveriti, ali sta ti dve podjetji izpolnili pogoje iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 in njuna prošnja je bila zavrnjena.
Two requests for newcomer status were received too late and therefore no conclusion could be reached on these requests by the date of adoption of this Regulation.
Dve prošnji za status novinca sta prispeli prepozno in se zato do datuma sprejetja te uredbe o njih ni bilo mogoče odločati.
The remaining twenty companies replied to the questionnaire intended to verify that the companies complied with the provisions of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Ostalih štiriindvajset podjetij je odgovorilo na vprašalnik, namenjen za preverjanje usklajenosti podjetij z določili iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004.
The evidence provided by thirteen of the abovementioned Indian exporters/producers is considered sufficient to grant these new companies the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and therefore to add these thirteen Indian companies to the list in the Annex (the ‘Annex’) of Council Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
Trinajst zgoraj omenjenih indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev je predložilo zadosten dokaz za to, da se tem novim podjetjem zagotovi stopnja dajatve, primerna za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso bila vključena v vzorec (to je 7,6 %), in se zato teh trinajst indijskih podjetij doda na seznam v Prilogi („Priloga“) k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004.
As far as the remaining seven Indian exporters/producers are concerned, two of them were related to companies subject to the current countervailing measures, three exported the product concerned to the Community during the original investigation period (i.e. from 1 October 2001 to 30 September 2002), one could not provide any invoice or evidence that it had actually exported to the Community the product concerned after the original investigation period or that it had entered into an irrevocable contractual obligation to export the product concerned to the Community.
Od ostalih sedmih indijskih izvoznikov/proizvajalcev sta bili dve podjetji pod vplivom trenutnih izravnalnih ukrepov, tri podjetja so izvozila zadevni proizvod v Skupnost v obdobju prvotne preiskave (tj. od 1. oktobra 2001 do 30. septembra 2002), eno podjetje ni zagotovilo nikakršnega računa ali dokaza o dejanskem izvozu zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnost po obdobju prvotne preiskave ali o prevzemu nepreklicne pogodbene dolžnosti za izvoz zadevnega proizvoda v Skupnost.
Finally, it is noted that one request could not be dealt with in the present context, since the evidence provided by the applicant company needs further examination.
Ugotovilo se je tudi, da se ena prošnja zdaj ne more obravnavati, ker se mora dokaz, ki ga je navedel vlagatelj, podrobneje preveriti.
Under these circumstances, it was considered that for the six companies referred to in recital (8), at least one of the criteria set out in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 was not fulfilled.
V teh okoliščinah je bilo ugotovljeno, da šest podjetij iz uvodne izjave (8) ni izpolnilo niti enega od pogojev iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004.
Therefore, their claim had to be rejected.
Zato je bila njihova zahteva zavrnjena.
Companies for which the newcomer status was not accepted were informed of the reasons of that decision and given an opportunity to make their views known in writing.
Podjetja, katerim ni bil potrjen status novinca, so bila obveščena o razlogih te odločitve in jim je bila dana priložnost, da pisno izrazijo svoje mnenje.
The two companies related to companies subject to the current countervailing measures claimed in one case that their related company did not exist anymore, and in the second case that they were indeed expecting to be subject to the same duty rate as their related company.
Dve podjetji, povezani s podjetji, ki so pod trenutnimi izravnalnimi ukrepi, sta v enem primeru trdili, da njuno povezano podjetje ni več obstajalo, v drugem primeru pa sta trdili, da sta pričakovali enako obravnavanje stopnje dajatve kot njihova povezana podjetja.
It was considered in the first case that the fact that the related company did not exist anymore was indeed a significant element in the current procedure, and that in this case it could not be considered that the newcomer was not respecting the second criterion.
V prvem primeru se je izkazalo, da je bilo dejstvo o neobstoju povezanega podjetja pomemben element v tem postopku in se torej ne more obravnavati kot da novinec ni upošteval drugega pogoja.
It was therefore decided that this company should also be subject to the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and therefore be added to the list in the Annex.
Zato je bilo sklenjeno, da se tudi to podjetje vključi v skupino podjetij s stopnjo dajatve, primerno za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso bila vključena v vzorec (tj. 7,6 %), in se jih doda na seznam v Prilogi.
In the second case, where the applicant company is related to a company under measures, it was found that this should not automatically deprive the company of being subject to the weighted average duty margin for cooperating companies not included in the sample.
V drugem primeru, ko je vlagatelj povezan s podjetjem na podlagi ukrepov, je bilo ugotovljeno, da to ne more samodejno prikrajšati podjetje za ponderirane povprečne stopnje dajatve za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso bila vključena v vzorec.
Indeed, it was examined whether both related companies, if considered together, would have been selected in the sample of exporting producers according to the selection criteria specified in recital (11) of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004.
V tem primeru je bilo preverjeno, ali bi bili obe povezani podjetji, če sta obravnavani skupaj, izbrani v vzorec izvoznikov - proizvajalcev, v skladu z izbranimi pogoji iz uvodne izjave (11) Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004.
Since this appeared not to be the case, the relationship between both companies does not affect the findings of the above mentioned Regulation.
Ker v tem primeru ni bilo tako, odnos med obema podjetjema ne vpliva na ugotovitve zgoraj omenjene Uredbe.
On these grounds, and given the Commission’s consistent practice to consider all related companies as one entity subject to the same duty, it was decided that this company should also be subject to the duty rate applicable to the cooperating companies not included in the sample (i.e. 7,6 %) and therefore be added to the list in the Annex.
Na tej osnovi in v zvezi s stalno prakso Komisije, da obravnava vsa povezana podjetja kot eno osebo z enako dajatvijo, je bilo odločeno, da ima to podjetje tudi stopnjo dajatve primerno za sodelujoča podjetja, ki niso bila vključena v vzorec (tj. 7,6 %), in se zato doda na seznam v Prilogi.
All arguments and submissions made by interested parties were analysed and duly taken into account when warranted,
Vsi argumenti in predlogi zainteresiranih strani so bili analizirani in upoštevani pri utemeljitvi –
The following companies shall be added to the list of exporters /producers from India listed in the Annex of Regulation (EC) No 74/2004:
Naslednja podjetja se doda na seznam izvoznikov/proizvajalcev iz Indije, ki so našteti v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 74/2004:
‘Alps Industries Ltd
„Alps Industries Ltd.
OJ L 12, 17.1.2004, p. 1.
UL L 12, 17.1.2004, str. 1.
OJ L 288, 21.10.1997, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 461/2004 (OJ L 77, 13.3.2004, p. 12).
UL L 288, 21.10.1997, str. 1, Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 461/2004 (UL L 77, 13.3.2004, str. 12).
G-2 International export Ltd
G-2 International export Ltd.
Mohan Overseas (P) Ltd
Mohan Overseas (P) Ltd.
Valiant Glass Works Private Ltd
Valiant Glass Works Private Ltd.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 2143/2004 of 13 December 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 74/2004 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of cotton-type bedlinen originating in India
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2143/2004 z dne 13. decembra 2004 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 74/2004 o uvedbi dokončne izravnalne dajatve pri uvozu bombažnega posteljnega perila s poreklom iz Indije
(Official Journal of the European Union L 370 of 17 December 2004)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 370 z dne 17. decembra 2004)
On page 2, in Article 1, list of exporters/producers, left column:
Na strani 2, v členu 1, seznam izvoznikov/proizvajalcev, v levi koloni
Ltd’.
Ltd.“.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2144/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2144/2004
to Commission Regulation of 16 December 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
k Uredbi Komisije z dne 16. decembra 2004 o določitvi pavšalnih uvoznih vrednosti za določanje vhodne cene nekaterega sadja in zelenjave
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2145/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2145/2004
amending for the 41st time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001
o enainštirideseti spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z Osamo bin Ladnom, mrežo Al-Kaida in Talibani, in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 467/2001
On 26 November and 2 December 2004, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.
novembra in 2. decembra 2004 je Odbor za sankcije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov sklenil spremeniti seznam oseb, skupin in subjektov, za katere velja zamrznitev sredstev in ekonomskih virov.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2034/2004 (OJ L 353, 27.11.2004, p. 11.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 2034/2004 (UL L 353, 27.11.2004, str. 11).
The entry ‘Al-Barakat Global Telecommunications (aka: Barakaat Globetelcompany), PO Box 3313, Dubai, UAE; Mogadishu, Somalia; Hargeysa, Somalia
Vpis „Al-Barakat Global Telecommunications (aka Barakaat Globetelcompany), PO Box 3313, Dubaj, UAE; Mogadishu, Somalija; Hargeysa, Somalija
’under the heading ‘Legal persons, groups and entities’ shall be replaced by the following:
“pod poglavjem „Pravne osebe, skupine in subjekti“ se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Al-Barakat Global Telecommunications (alias (a) Barakaat Globetelcompany (b) Al Barakat Telecommunications Ltd. Address: (a) PO Box 3313, Dubai (EAU)
Al-Barakat Global Telecommunications (alias (a) Barakaat Globetelcompany (b) Al Barakat Telecommunications Ltd. Naslov: (a) PO Box 3313, Dubai, UAE,
(b) Mogadishu, Somalia, (c) Hargeysa, Somalia.
Mogadishu, Somalija, (c) Hargeysa, Somalija.
The entry ‘Al Furqan (alias (a) Dzemilijati Furkan, (b) Dzem’ijjetul Furqan, (c) Association for Citizens' Rights and Resistance to Lies, (d) Dzemijetul Furkan, (e) Association of Citizens for the Support of Truth and Suppression of Lies, (f) Sirat, (g) Association of Education, Culture and Building Society — Sirat, (h) Association for Education, Culture and Building Society — Sirat, (i) Association for Education, Cultural and to Create Society — Sirat, (j) Istikamet, (k) in Siratel).
Vpis „Al Furqan (alias (a) Dzemilijati Furkan, (b) Dzem’ijjetul Furqan, (c) Zveza za pravice državljanov in zatiranje laži, (d) Dzemijetul Furkan, (e) Zveza državljanov za podporo pravici in zatiranje laži, (f) Sirat, (g) Zveza za izobraževanje, kulturo in družbo — Sirat, (h) Zveza za izobraževanje, kulturo in družbo— Sirat, (i) Zveza za izobraževanje, kulturo in družbo — Sirat, (j) Istikamet, (k) v Siratelu).
Addresses: (a) Put Mladih Muslimana 30a, 71 000 Sarajevo (Bosnia-Herzegovina)
Naslovi: (a)Put Mladih Muslimana 30a, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosna in Hercegovina
Strossmajerova 72, Zenica (Bosnia-Herzegovina)
Strossmajerova 72, Zenica, Bosna in Hercegovina