natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The competent national authority shall carry out administrative controls in respect of all farms benefiting from an individual derogation for the assessment of compliance with the maximum amount of 250 kg nitrogen per hectare per year from grazing livestock manure, with total nitrogen and phosphate application standards and conditions on land use.
Pristojni nacionalni organ izvaja upravne kontrole vseh kmetij, za katere je odobreno individualno odstopanje, da oceni, ali upoštevajo najvišjo količino 250 kg dušika iz gnoja pašne živine na hektar letno, merila glede skupne količine vnesenega dušika in pogoje za rabo zemljišč.
A programme of inspections shall be established based on risk analysis, results of controls of the previous years and results of general random controls of legislation implementing Directive 91/676/EEC.
Na podlagi analize tveganja, rezultatov kontrol iz prejšnjih let in rezultatov splošnih naključnih kontrol zakonodaje o izvajanju Direktive 91/676/EGS se vzpostavi program pregledov.
Specific inspections shall address at least 5 % of farms benefiting from an individual derogation with regard to land use, livestock number and manure production.
Na vsaj 5 % kmetij, za katere je odobreno individualno odstopanje, se izvedejo posebni pregledi v zvezi z rabo zemljišč, številom glav živine in proizvodnjo gnoja.
Field inspections shall be carried out in at least 3 % of farms in respect to the conditions set out in Article 5 and 6.
Na vsaj 3 % kmetij se izvedejo poljski pregledi v zvezi s pogoji iz členov 5 in 6.
The competent authority shall submit the results of the monitoring, every year, to the Commission, with a concise report on evaluation practice (controls at farm level, including information on non compliant farms based on results of administrative and field inspections) and water quality evolution (based on root zone leaching monitoring, surface/ground water quality and model-based calculations).
Pristojni organ Komisiji vsako leto predloži rezultate spremljanja, skupaj s strnjenim poročilom o načinu vrednotenja (nadzor na ravni kmetij, vključno s podatki, temelječimi na rezultatih upravnih in poljskih pregledov, o kmetijah, ki se ne držijo določb) ter spreminjanju kakovosti vode (na podlagi spremljanja spiranja v območju korenin, kakovosti površinske/talne vode in modelno zasnovanih izračunov).
The first report shall be transmitted by March 2007, and subsequently every year by March in 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Prvo poročilo se pošlje najpozneje marca 2007, poznejša letna poročila pa najpozneje marca 2008, 2009 in 2010.
In addition to the data referred to in paragraph 1 the report shall include the following:
Poleg podatkov iz odstavka 1 vsebuje poročilo tudi naslednje:
data related to fertilisation in all farms which benefit from an individual derogation;
podatke o gnojenju za vse kmetije, za katere je odobreno individualno odstopanje;
trends in livestock numbers for each livestock category in the Netherlands and in derogation farms;
podatke o spreminjanju števila glav živine za vsako kategorijo živine na Nizozemskem in na kmetijah, za katere je dovoljeno individualno odstopanje;
trends in national manure production as far as nitrogen and phosphate in manure are concerned;
podatke o spreminjanju nacionalne proizvodnje gnoja glede na dušik in fosfat;
a summary of the results of controls related to excretion coefficients for pig and poultry manure at country level.
povzetek rezultatov kontrol v povezavi s koeficientom izločanja prašičjega in perutninskega gnoja na državni ravni.
The results thus obtained will be taken into consideration by the Commission with regard to an eventual new request for derogation by the Dutch authorities.
Dobljene rezultate bo Komisija upoštevala pri morebitnem novem zahtevku nizozemskih organov za odstopanje.
In order to provide elements regarding management in grassland farms, for which a derogation applies, and the achieved level of optimisation of management, a report on fertilisation and yield shall be prepared annually for the different soil types and crops by the competent authority and submitted to the Commission.
Da se zagotovi vpogled v upravljanje travniških kmetij, za katere je dovoljeno odstopanje, in v doseženo raven optimizacije upravljanja, pristojni organ vsako leto za različne tipe tal in posevkov pripravi poročilo o gnojenju in donosu in ga predloži Komisiji.
This Decision shall apply from 1 January 2006.
Ta odločba začne veljati 1. januarja 2006.
It shall expire on 31 December 2009.
Veljati preneha 31. decembra 2009.
Fertilisation accounts shall be kept by each farm. They shall be submitted to the competent authority for each calendar year.
Vsaka kmetija vodi bilanco gnojenja, ki se predloži pristojnemu organu za vsako koledarsko leto.
concerning certain protection measures in relation to a suspicion of highly pathogenic avian influenza in Ukraine
o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi s sumom na visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v Ukrajini
(notified under document number C(2005) 5385)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 5385)
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [1], and in particular Article 22 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [1], in zlasti člena 22 Direktive,
Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming.
Aviarna influenca je kužna virusna bolezen pri perutnini in ptičih, ki povzroča smrt in motnje, ki lahko hitro dobijo epizootske razsežnosti in so lahko resna nevarnost za zdravje živali in ljudi ter močno zmanjšujejo donosnost reje perutnine.
There is a risk that the disease agent might be introduced via international trade in live poultry and poultry products.
Obstaja tveganje, da se povzročitelj bolezni prenese z mednarodno trgovino z živo perutnino in perutninskimi izdelki.
On 5 December 2005 Ukraine has notified to the Commission an outbreak of avian influenza.
Ukrajina je 5. decembra 2005 obvestila Komisijo o izbruhu aviarne influence pri perutnini.
Imports from Ukraine of birds and poultry and products derived from these species are not authorised with the exception of live birds other than poultry, untreated feathers and certain treated byproducts including treated feathers which do not pose an animal health threat to the Community.
Uvoz ptic in perutnine ter proizvodov iz teh vrst ptic iz Ukrajine ni dovoljen, z izjemo živih ptic, razen perutnine, neobdelanega perja in nekaterih obdelanih stranskih proizvodov, vključno z obdelanim perjem, ki ne ogroža zdravja živali v Skupnosti.
Imports of live birds other than poultry and pet birds from Ukraine are suspended until 31 January 2006 as a result of Decision 2005/759/EC of 27 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain third countries and the movement from third countries of birds accompanying their owners [2] and Decision 2005/760/EC of 27 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain third countries for the import of captive birds [3].
Uvoz živih ptic, ki niso perutnina, ter ljubiteljske vrste ptic iz Ukrajine se ustavi do 31. januarja 2006 zaradi Odločbe 2005/759/ES o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v nekaterih tretjih državah in premiku ptic iz tretjih držav, ki spremljajo svoje lastnike [2] ter zaradi Odločbe 2005/760/ES o nekaterih zaščitnih ukrepih pri uvozu ptic v ujetništvu v zvezi z visoko patogeno aviarno influenco v nekaterih tretjih državah [3].
In view of the animal health risk of disease introduction into the Community, it is therefore appropriate to temporarily suspend imports from Ukraine of untreated feathers.
Glede na tveganje prenosa bolezni na živali v Skupnosti je zato ustrezno, da se začasno ustavi uvoz neobdelanega perja iz Ukrajine.
Member States shall suspend the importation from the territory of Ukraine of untreated feathers and parts of untreated feathers.
Države članice zaustavijo uvoz neobdelanega perja in dele neobdelanega perja iz ozemlja Ukrajine.
Member States shall ensure that when imported from the territory of Ukraine, consignments of treated feathers or parts of treated feathers (excluding treated decorative feathers, treated feathers carried by travelers for their private use or consignments of treated feathers sent to private individuals for non industrial purposes) are accompanied by a commercial document stating that the treated feathers or parts of treated feathers have been treated with a steam current or by some other method ensuring the inactivation of the pathogen.
Države članice zagotovijo, da ob uvozu z ozemlja Ukrajine, pošiljke obdelanega perja ali delov perja (razen obdelanega okrasnega perja, obdelanega perja, ki ga potniki nosijo za svojo osebno uporabo, ali pošiljk obdelanega perja, poslanih posameznikom za neindustrijske namene) spremlja trgovinski dokument z izjavo, da so bili obdelano perje ali deli perja obdelani s parnim curkom ali z drugo metodo, ki zagotavlja inaktivacijo patogena.
Member States shall immediately take the necessary measures to comply with this Decision and publish those measures.
Države članice nemudoma sprejmejo ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s to odločbo in jih objavijo.
This Decision shall apply until 31 May 2006.
Ta odločba se uporablja do 31. maja 2006.
Done at Brussels, 9 December 2005.
V Bruslju, 9. decembra 2005
OJ L 285, 28.10.2005 p. 52.
UL L 285, 28.10.2005, str. 52.
OJ L 285, 28.10.2005 p. 60.
UL L 285, 28.10.2005, str. 60.
concerning the effects of the accession of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland to the European Union on the participation of the European Community in the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Oder and the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe
o določitvi učinkov pristopa Češke republike in Republike Poljske na udeležbo Evropske skupnosti v Konvenciji o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Odre in Konvenciji o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Labe
Having regard to the 2003 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 57 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu iz leta 2003 in zlasti člena 57 Akta,
The participation of the European Community in the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Oder [1] and to the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe [2] (hereinafter referred to as the Oder and Elbe Conventions) was necessary because the two Conventions were concluded with third countries and addressed matters covered by Community environmental policy.
Udeležba Evropske skupnosti v Konvenciji o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Odre [1] in Konvenciji o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Labe [2] (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Konvenciji o Odri in Labi“) je bila potrebna, ker sta bili Konvenciji sklenjeni s tretjimi državami in sta obravnavali vprašanja s področja okoljske politike Skupnosti.
As from 1 May 2004, after the accession of the Czech Republic and the Republic of Poland to the European Union, all Contracting Parties to the Oder and Elbe Conventions are Member States of the European Union.
Od 1. maja 2004, po pristopu Češke republike in Republike Poljske k Evropski uniji, so vse pogodbenice Konvencij o Odri in Labi postale države članice Evropske unije.
Therefore, the basis for the Community’s consent to be bound by such Conventions no longer exists.
Zaradi tega ni podlage za soglasje Skupnosti o tem, da sta zanjo Konvenciji zavezujoči.
From this moment, the participation of the Community is no longer necessary or justified.
Od tega datuma udeležba Skupnosti ni več potrebna oziroma upravičena.
Moreover, the enlargement of the European Union has had the effect of radically transforming the legal relations between the Contracting Parties.
Širitev Evropske unije je poleg tega korenito spremenila pravna razmerja med pogodbenicami.
Upon accession, the underlying policy objectives of the Oder and Elbe Conventions may be achieved through the measures laid down in Community legislation.
Zaradi pristopa je možno doseči osnovne cilje politike Konvencij o Odri in Labi na podlagi ukrepov, določenih v zakonodaji Skupnosti.
The 2003 Act of Accession has not specifically provided for this situation and it is therefore necessary to adopt the required measures in accordance with Article 57 thereof, which allows such omissions to be corrected.
Akt o pristopu iz leta 2003 ne vsebuje posebnih določb za tak primer in je zato treba sprejeti zahtevane ukrepe v skladu z njegovim členom 57, ki omogoča da se take opustitve popravijo.
It should be therefore made clear that, with effect of the date of accession, the Community is no longer a party to the Oder and Elbe Conventions and that certain transitory measures may need to be taken,
Zato je treba jasno navesti, da od datuma pristopa Skupnost ni več pogodbenica Konvencij o Odri in Labi in da bo morda treba sprejeti prehodne ukrepe –
The European Community has ceased to be a party to the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Oder and to the Convention on the International Commission for the Protection of the Elbe with effect of 1 May 2004.
Od 1. maja 2004 Evropska skupnost ni več pogodbenica Konvencije o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Odre in Konvencije o Mednarodni komisiji za varstvo Labe.
If appropriate, the Commission shall agree with the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland solutions to any transitory problem which may result from the end of the participation of the Community in the Oder and Elbe Conventions.
Če je primerno, se Komisija z Republiko Poljsko, Češko republiko in Zvezno republiko Nemčijo dogovori o reševanju morebitnih prehodnih težav, ki bi lahko nastopili zaradi prenehanja udeležbe Skupnosti v Konvencijah o Odri in Labi.
This Decision is addressed to the Czech Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Poland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Češko republiko, Zvezno republiko Nemčijo in Republiko Poljsko.
Decision 1999/257/EC (OJ L 100, 15.4.1999, p. 20).
Sklep 1999/257/ES (UL L 100, 15.4.1999, str. 20).
Decision 91/598/EEC (OJ L 321, 23.11.1991, p. 24).
Sklep 91/598/EGS (UL L 321, 23.11.1991, str. 24).
releasing Cyprus and Malta from the obligation to apply Council Directive 2002/54/EC on the marketing of beet seed
o oprostitvi Cipra in Malte obveznosti uporabe Direktive Sveta 2002/54/ES o trženju semena pese
(notified under document number C(2005) 4756)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4756)
(Only the Greek and Maltese texts are authentic)
(Besedili v grškem in malteškem jeziku sta edini verodostojni)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/54/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of beet seed [1], and in particular Article 30a thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/54/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena pese [1], in zlasti člena 30a Direktive,
Having regard to the requests submitted by Cyprus and Malta,
ob upoštevanju zahtev, ki sta jih predložila Ciper in Malta,
Directive 2002/54/EC sets out certain provisions for the marketing of beet seed.
Direktiva 2002/54/ES postavlja določene zahteve za trženje semena pese.
This Directive also provides that, subject to certain conditions, Member States may be wholly or partly released from the obligation to apply this Directive.
Ta direktiva določa tudi, da so države članice pod določenimi pogoji lahko v celoti ali delno oproščene obveznosti uporabe te direktive.
Seed of beet is not normally reproduced or marketed in Cyprus and Malta.
Seme pese se običajno ne proizvaja ali trži na Cipru in Malti.
In addition, the growing of beet is of minimal economic importance in the abovementioned countries.
Poleg tega je gojenje pese v navedenih državah minimalnega gospodarskega pomena.
As long as those conditions remain, the relevant Member States should be released from the obligation to apply the provisions of Directive 2002/54/EC to the material in question.
Dokler veljajo ti pogoji, morajo biti ustrezne države članice oproščene obveznosti uporabe določb Direktive 2002/54/ES za zadevni material.
Cyprus and Malta are hereby released from the obligation to apply Directive 2002/54/EC, with the exception of Article 20.
Ciper in Malta sta s tem oproščena obveznosti uporabe Direktive 2002/54/ES z izjemo člena 20.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Cyprus and the Republic of Malta.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Ciper in Republiko Malto.
of 12 December 2005
z dne 12. decembra 2005
amending Decisions 2004/695/EC and 2004/840/EC as regards the reallocation of the Community’s financial contribution to certain Member States for their programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and for checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses for 2005
o spremembi odločb 2004/695/ES in 2004/840/ES glede prerazporeditve finančnega prispevka Skupnosti nekaterim državam članicam za njihove programe za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni ter preglede, namenjene preprečevanju zoonoz v letu 2005
(notified under document number C(2005) 4792)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko Κ(2005) 4792)
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 24(5) and (6), and Articles 29 and 32 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1], in zlasti člena 24(5) in (6) ter členov 29 in 32 Odločbe,
Decision 90/424/EEC provides for the possibility of financial participation by the Community towards the programmes of Member States aimed at the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and for checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses.
Odločba 90/424/EGS določa možnost finančnega prispevka Skupnosti programom držav članic za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni ter za preglede, namenjene preprečevanju zoonoz.
Commission Decision 2004/695/EC of 14 October 2004 on the lists of programmes for the eradication and monitoring of animal diseases and of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses qualifying for a financial contribution from the Community in 2005 [2], sets out the proposed rate and maximum amount of the Community’s financial contribution for each programme submitted by the Member States.
Odločba Komisije 2004/695/ES z dne 14. oktobra 2004 o seznamu programov za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni in seznamu programov pregledov, katerih namen je preprečevanje zoonoz, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za finančni prispevek Skupnosti v letu 2005 [2], določa predlagano stopnjo in najvišji znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za vsak program, ki so ga predložile države članice.
Commission Decision 2004/840/EC of 30 November 2004 approving programmes for the eradiction and monitoring of certain animal diseases and of checks aimed at the prevention of zoonoses presented by the Member States for the year 2005 and fixing the level of the Community’s financial contribution [3], sets out the maximum amount of the Community’s financial contribution for each programme submitted by the Member States.
Odločba Komisije 2004/840/ES z dne 30. novembra 2004 o odobritvi programov za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje nekaterih živalskih bolezni ter za nadzor, usmerjen v preprečevanje zoonoz, ki so jih za leto 2005 predstavile države članice, in o določitvi višine finančnega prispevka Skupnosti [3], določa najvišji znesek finančnega prispevka Skupnosti za vsak program, ki so ga predložile države članice.
The Commission has analysed the reports forwarded by the Member States on the expenditures of those programmes.
Komisija je proučila poročila o izdatkih navedenih programov, ki so jih posredovale države članice.
The results of that analysis show that certain Member States will not utilise their full allocation for 2005 while others will spend in excess of the allocated amount.
Rezultati navedene analize kažejo, da nekatere države ne bodo v celoti porabile dodeljenih sredstev za leto 2005, medtem ko jih bodo druge porabile več.
The Community’s financial contribution to certain of those programmes therefore needs to be adjusted.
Zato je treba finančni prispevek Skupnosti za nekatere navedene programe prilagoditi.
The reallocation should be based on the most recent information on the expenditure actually incurred by the concerned Member States.
Prerazporeditev mora temeljiti na najbolj svežih podatkih o izdatkih, ki so jih zadevne države članice dejansko imele.
Decisions 2004/695/EC and 2004/840/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbi 2004/695/ES in 2004/840/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annexes I and II to Decision 2004/695/EC are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Prilogi I in II k Odločbi 2004/695/ES se spremenita v skladu s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
Decision 2004/840/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 2004/840/ES se spremeni:
in Article 3(2) ‘EUR 400000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 900000’;
V členu 3(2) se „400000 EUR“ nadomesti z „900000 EUR“;
in Article 5(2) ‘EUR 900000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 0’;
V členu 5(2) se „900000 EUR“ nadomesti z „0 EUR“;
in Article 6(2) ‘EUR 1500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 675000’;
V členu 6(2) se „1500000 EUR“ nadomesti z „675000 EUR“;
in Article 7(2) ‘EUR 200000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 300000’;
V členu 7(2) se „200000 EUR“ nadomesti z „300000 EUR“;
in Article 8(2) ‘EUR 400000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 500000’;
V členu 8(2) se „400000 EUR“ nadomesti z „500000 EUR“;
in Article 9(2) ‘EUR 100000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 105000’;
V členu 9(2) se „100000 EUR“ nadomesti z „105000 EUR“;
in Article 11(2) ‘EUR 5000000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 5850000’;
V členu 11(2) se „5000000 EUR“ nadomesti z „5850000 EUR“;
in Article 12(2) ‘EUR 5000000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 3600000’;
V členu 12(2) se „5000000 EUR“ nadomesti z „3600000 EUR“;
in Article 13(2) ‘EUR 3000000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2875000’;
V členu 13(2) se „3000000 EUR“ nadomesti z „2875000 EUR“;
in Article 14(2) ‘EUR 800000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 100000’;
V členu 14(2) se „800000 EUR“ nadomesti z „100000 EUR“;
in Article 15(2) ‘EUR 1800000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 1740000’;
V členu 15(2) se „1800000 EUR“ nadomesti z „1740000 EUR“;
in Article 16(2) ‘EUR 5000000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4415000’;
V členu 16(2) se „5000000 EUR“ nadomesti z „4415000 EUR“;
in Article 19(2) ‘EUR 4000000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4600000’;
V členu 19(2) se „4000000 EUR“ nadomesti z „4600000 EUR“;
in Article 20(2) ‘EUR 2500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 2725000’;
V členu 20(2) se „2500000 EUR“ nadomesti z „2725000 EUR“;
in Article 21(2) ‘EUR 700000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 770000’;
V členu 21(2) se „700000 EUR“ nadomesti z „770000 EUR“;
in Article 22(2) ‘EUR 250000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 300000’;
V členu 22(2) se „250000 EUR“ nadomesti z „300000 EUR“;
in Article 24(2) ‘EUR 250000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 350000’;
V členu 24(2) se „250000 EUR“ nadomesti z „350000 EUR“;
in Article 27(2) ‘EUR 200000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 330000’;
V členu 27(2) se „200000 EUR“ nadomesti z „330000 EUR“;
in Article 28(2) ‘EUR 175000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 150000’;
V členu 28(2) se „175000 EUR“ nadomesti z „150000 EUR“;
in Article 30(2) ‘EUR 6500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 6340000’;
V členu 30(2) se „6500000 EUR“ nadomesti z „6340000 EUR“;
in Article 31(2) ‘EUR 300000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 500000’;
V členu 31(2) se „300000 EUR“ nadomesti z „500000 EUR“;
in Article 32(2) ‘EUR 4500000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 4470000’;
V členu 32(2) se „4500000 EUR“ nadomesti z „4470000 EUR“;
in Article 33(2) ‘EUR 1700000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 1900000’;
V členu 33(2) se „1700000 EUR“ nadomesti z „1900000 EUR“;
in Article 34(2) ‘EUR 25000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 875000’;
V členu 34(2) se „25000 EUR“ nadomesti z „875000 EUR“;
in Article 35(2) ‘EUR 50000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 95000’;
V členu 35(2) se „50000 EUR“ nadomesti z „95000 EUR“;
in Article 36(2) ‘EUR 400000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 675000’;
V členu 36(2) se „400000 EUR“ nadomesti z „675000 EUR“;