natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
salaries and remunerations of personnel specifically employed.
plače in honorarji posebej zaposlenega osebja.
In connection with vaccination, eligible expenditure may cover the salaries and fees of personnel specifically recruited, consumables and specific equipment used for vaccination and, where applicable, the purchase by the Member State of the vaccines necessary for eradication of the disease where the Community is not in a position to supply them.
V zvezi s cepljenjem lahko upravičeni odhodki pokrivajo plače in honorarje za posebej najeto osebje, potrošno blago in posebno opremo za cepljenje in po potrebi nakup cepiva s strani države članice, če Skupnost ne bi mogla zagotoviti cepiv za izkoreninjenje bolezni.
Application for a contribution towards compensation for the cost of animals compulsorily slaughtered
Zahtevek za prispevek k nadomestilu stroškov obveznega zakola živali
Contact with outbreak No
Stik s št. izbruha
Identification No of holding
Identifik. št. gospodarstva
Farmer
Rejec
Location of the holding
Kraj gospodarstva
Method of destruction
Metoda uničenja
Weight at time of slaughter
Teža ob uničenju
No of animals, by category
Število živali na kategorijo
Amount paid, by category
Znesek plačan na kategorijo
Other costs paid to the owner (not including VAT)
Drugi stroški, plačani rejcu (brez DDV)
Total compensation (not including VAT)
Celotna odškodnina (brez DDV)
Other (please specify)
Druga (navedite)
goats
Koze
other
Drugo
ewes
Ovca
rams
Oven
lambs
Jagnje
nannygoats
Koza
billygoats
Kozel
kids
Kozliček
Application for a contribution towards compensation for other eligible costs associated with the compulsory slaughter
Zahtevek za prispevek k nadomestilu drugih upravičenih stroškov obveznega zakola
Other costs incurred by holding No … (not including compensation for the value of the animals)
„Drugi stroški“ gospodarstva št. … (razen odškodnine za vrednost živali)
Amount (not including VAT)
Znesek brez DDV
Slaughter
Zakol
Destruction (transport and processing)
Uničenje (prevoz in predelava)
Disinsectisation (salaries and products)
Dezinsekcija (plače in proizvodi)
Application for a contribution towards compensation for other eligible costs associated with the bluetongue vaccination campaign
Zahtevek za prispevek k nadomestilu za druge upravičene stroške v okviru akcije cepljenja proti bolezni modrikastega jezika
Costs incurred
Nastali stroški
Category of vaccines
Kategorija cepiva
Salaries and fees (personnel specifically recruited)
Plače in honorarji (posebej najeto osebje)
Consumables and vaccination-specific equipment
Potrošno blago in posebna oprema za cepljenje
on the State Aid C 38/03 implemented by Spain (further restructuring aid to the public Spanish shipyards)
o državni pomoči C 38/03, ki jo izvaja Španija (nadaljnja pomoč za prestrukturiranje španskih javnih ladjedelnic)
(notified under document number C(2004) 3918)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 3918)
(Only the Spanish version is authentic)
(Besedilo v španskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1013/97 of 2 June 1997 on aid to certain shipyards under restructuring [1],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1013/97 z dne 2. junija 1997 o pomoči nekaterim ladjedelnicam pri prestrukturiranju [1],
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 of 29 June 1998 establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding [2],
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1540/98 z dne 29. junija 1998 o vzpostavitvi novih pravil za pomoč ladjedelništvu [2],
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [3] and having regard to their comments,
ob pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe na podlagi zgoraj navedenih določb [3], in ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
I. THE PROCEDURE
I. POSTOPEK
Based on Regulation (EC) No 1013/97, the Commission in a decision of 6 August 1997 [4] authorised restructuring aid for Spanish public shipyards amounting to approximately EUR 1,9 billion. According to both the decision and Council Regulation (EC) No 1013/97 the condition for the approval of the aid was that no more aid for restructuring purposes should be provided.
Na osnovi Uredbe (ES) št. 1013/97 je Komisija v odločbi z dne 6. avgusta 1997 [4] odobrila pomoč za prestrukturiranje španskih državnih ladjedelnic v višini približno 1,9 milijarde EUR. V skladu z odločbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/97 je bil pogoj za odobritev pomoči, da se pomoč za prestrukturiranje ne zagotavlja več.
In the years 2000, 2001 and 2002, the state holding company Sociedad Estatal de Participationes Industriales (hereafter SEPI) provided IZAR Construcciones navales (hereafter IZAR) with capital injections for a total sum of EUR 1477 million. By letters dated 8 November 2002 and 14 January 2003, the Commission requested information on this matter.
V letih 2000, 2001 in 2002 je državni holding Sociedad Estatal de Participationes Industriales (v nadaljevanju „SEPI“) vložil v družbo IZAR Construcciones navales (v nadaljevanju „IZAR“) denarne zneske v skupni višini 1477 milijonov EUR. Komisija je v pismih z dne 8. novembra 2002 in 14. januarja 2003 zaprosila za podatke o tej zadevi.
By decision of 27 May 2003 the Commission initiated the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty (hereafter the opening) concerning the transactions whereby SEPI injected EUR 1477 million in IZAR.
Komisija je z odločbo z dne 27. maja 2003 začela postopek, ki je določen v členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES (v nadaljevanju „začetek postopka“), v zvezi s transakcijami, s katerimi je SEPI vložil 1477 milijonov EUR v IZAR.
The Spanish authorities were informed of the decision in a letter from the Commission dated 28 May 2003.
Španske oblasti so bile obveščene o odločbi s pismom Komisije z dne 28. maja 2003.
Spain, by letters dated 11 July 2003, 29 July 2003, 11 August 2003, 19 January 2004, 23 February 2004, 14 April 2004 and 26 July 2004 submitted its comments on the opening of the procedure.
Španija je s pismi z dne 11. julija 2003, 29. julija 2003, 11. avgusta 2003, 19. januarja 2004, 23. februarja 2004, 14. aprila 2004 in 26. julija 2004 poslala svoje pripombe k začetku postopka.
Following the opening of the procedure, the Commission received comments from Royal Van Lent Shipyard by letter dated 24 September 2003, from a party requesting anonymity by letter dated 24 September 2003 and from IZAR by letter dated 6 October 2003.
Komisija je po začetku postopka prejela pripombe v pismu z dne 24. septembra 2003 od ladjedelnice Royal Van Lent, v pismu z dne 24. septembra 2003 od stranke, ki je zahtevala anonimnost, in v pismu z dne 6. oktobra 2003 od družbe IZAR.
These comments were forwarded to Spain by letter of 13 October 2003.
Te pripombe so bile v pismu z dne 13. oktobra 2003 naslovljene na Španijo.
Spain provided comments by letter dated 10 November 2003.
Španija je svoje pripombe predložila v pismu z dne 10. novembra 2003.
IZAR on 17 November 2003 brought an action [5] against the Commission before the Court of First Instance, requesting an annulment of the opening of the procedure.
IZAR je dne 17. novembra 2003 [5] proti Komisiji na Sodišče prve stopnje vložil tožbo, s katero zahteva razveljavitev začetka postopka.
THE BENEFICIARIES
UPRAVIČENCI
SEPI in July 2000 decided to merge all the publicly owned, military and civil shipyards and related activities, which at that time operated as companies, into one group.
SEPI se je julija 2000 odločil, da bo v eno skupino združil vse vojaške in civilne ladjedelnice v državni lasti in druge sorodne dejavnosti, ki so takrat delovale kot podjetja.
All the civil shipyards and related activities were therefore bought, on 20 July 2000, by BAZAN and then merged into BAZAN which subsequently changed name to IZAR.
Tako je BAZAN odkupil civilne ladjedelnice in sorodne dejavnosti dne 20. julija 2000 in jih nato združil v BAZAN, ki se je nato preimenoval v IZAR.
IZAR’s civil activities mainly take place at Astilleros de Cadiz (Cadiz), Astilleros de Puerto Real (Puerto Real), Astilleros de Sestao (Sestao), Astilleros de Sevilla (Sevilla), Juliana Constructora Gijonesa (Juliana), Fábrica de Manises (Manises), Astilleros de Fene (Fene).
Civilne dejavnosti družbe IZAR pretežno potekajo v Astilleros de Cadiz („Cadiz“), Astilleros de Puerto Real („Puerto Real“), Astilleros de Sestao („Sestao“), Astilleros de Sevilla („Sevilla“), Juliana Constructora Gijonesa („Juliana“), Fábrica de Manises („Manises“) in Astilleros de Fene („Fene“).
IZAR also have three mainly military shipbuilding sites, Ferrol, Cartagena and San Fernando.
IZAR ima tudi tri pretežno vojaške ladjedelnice, in sicer Ferrol, Cartagena in San Fernando.
THE AID
POMOČ
The investigation covers the following capital injections from SEPI: EUR 1322,227 million (ESP 220 billion), provided to BAZAN on 28 July 2000, EUR 105,171 million provided to IZAR in 2001 and EUR 50,000 million provided to IZAR in 2002.
Preiskava zajema naslednje denarne zneske s strani holdinga SEPI: 1322,227 milijona EUR (220 milijard pezet), ki jih je vložil v BAZAN dne 28. julija 2000, 105,171 milijona EUR v IZAR v letu 2001 in 50,000 milijonov EUR v IZAR v letu 2002.
In the opening decision the Commission noted that the capital provided by SEPI to IZAR may confer economic benefits to civil shipbuilding which they were unlikely to have received from commercial sources.
Komisija je v odločbi o začetku postopka opozorila, da bi lahko kapital, ki ga je SEPI vložil v IZAR, civilnemu ladjedelništvu prinesel finančne koristi, ki jih s svojo poslovno dejavnostjo najverjetneje ne bi pridobil.
The measures therefore were likely to constitute aid.
Ukrep je zato verjetno predstavljal pomoč.
By its nature such aid is likely to distort competition.
Taka pomoč po svoji naravi izkrivlja konkurenco.
Based on the recent history of the civil yards, the Commission therefore suspected that the civil yards had received financial support through the capital injections given to IZAR and had doubts that such support would be in compliance with the rules on state aid for shipbuilding.
Komisija je glede na bližnjo preteklost civilnih ladjedelnic izrazila sum, da so civilne ladjedelnice prejele finančno pomoč z denarnimi zneski, ki jih je prejela družba IZAR, in izrazila dvom, da bi bila taka pomoč v skladu s pravili za dodelitev državne pomoči v ladjedelništvu.
The objective of this state aid procedure is therefore to clarify if any of the capital provided to IZAR has benefited the civil shipyards or other civil activities.
Namen tega postopka o državni pomoči je zato razjasniti, ali je kapital, ki ga je prejel IZAR, kakor koli koristil civilnim ladjedelnicam in drugim civilnim dejavnostim.
COMMENTS TO THE OPENING OF THE PROCEDURE
PRIPOMBE K ZAČETKU POSTOPKA
The Commission received comments from three parties.
Komisija je prejela pripombe treh strank.
A party requesting anonymity made a joint comment for this case and State aid case C-40/00 [6].
Stranka, ki je zahtevala anonimnost, je predložila združeni pripombi k temu primeru in k primeru državne pomoči C-40/00 [6].
It underlines that the investigated aid has created a serious distortion in the market of recreational ships.
Poudarila je, da je preučevana pomoč povzročila resno izkrivljanje trga ladij za rekreacijo.
Another joint comment for this case and case C-40/00 was received from Royal van Lent Shipyard B.V.
Drugo združeno pripombo k temu primeru in k primeru C-40/00 je Komisija prejela od ladjedelnice Royal van Lent BV.
The company claims that aids granted by the Spanish government during the past years has been extremely prejudicial for many of the competitors in the market for mega yachts.
Družba trdi, da so pomoči, ki jih je zagotovila španska vlada, povzročile izjemno veliko škodo mnogim konkurentom na trgu luksuznih jaht.
The Commission also received comments from IZAR.
Komisija je prejela tudi pripombe družbe IZAR.
IZAR claims that the concerned capital injections fall under Article 296 of the EC Treaty, and that any problems concerning distortion of trade should be treated within the context of the cooperation procedure of Article 298 of the EC Treaty.
IZAR trdi, da sodijo zadevni denarni zneski v člen 296 Pogodbe ES in da je treba vse težave glede izkrivljanja trgovine obravnavati v okviru postopka sodelovanja iz člena 298 Pogodbe ES.
IZAR also claims that the capital injected by SEPI is not State resources and in any case falls under the market investor principle.
IZAR tudi trdi, da kapitala, ki ga je vložil SEPI, ni mogoče šteti za državna sredstva in da v vsakem primeru sodi v načelo vlagatelja na trgu.
IZAR finally claims that the possibility of recovery of any aid provided to the public Spanish shipyards in 1997 is unacceptable since it is existing aid.
IZAR nazadnje trdi, da možnost vračila kakršne koli pomoči, ki so jo prejele španske javne ladjedelnice v letu 1997, ni sprejemljiva, ker gre za obstoječo pomoč.
COMMENTS FROM SPAIN
PRIPOMBE IZ ŠPANIJE
COMMENTS FOLLOWING THE OPENING
PRIPOMBE PO ZAČETKU POSTOPKA
In the procedure, Spain provided the Commission with the following arguments on why, in its view, no State aid was involved in the concerned capital injections.
Španija je v tem postopku predložila Komisiji naslednje dokaze, zakaj po njenem mnenju zadevni denarni zneski niso vključevali državne pomoči.
Firstly, Spain claims that SEPI acted as a private investor in a market economy, that aims at maximizing profits, and that the Commission did not prove that SEPI's resources comes from the State or are imputable to the State.
Španija najprej trdi, da je SEPI deloval v tržnem gospodarstvu kot zasebni vlagatelj, ki želi povečati dobiček, in da Komisija ni dokazala, da sredstva družbe SEPI prihajajo od države ali se ji lahko pripišejo.
Furthermore, the capital was injected in the context of a plan for the company BAZAN, which used to be a military company.
Poleg tega je bil kapital vložen v okviru načrta za družbo BAZAN, ki je bila nekdaj vojaška družba.
The capital was injected in order to cover a number of costs linked to this plan, developed in 1998.
Kapital je bil vložen zato, da bi kril številne stroške, povezane s tem načrtom, ki je nastal leta 1998.
In particular, EUR […] [7] million related to so-called externalisation of social costs linked to pre-pensions by former BAZAN employees.
Zlasti […] [7] milijonov EUR, ki so povezani s tako imenovanim pozunanjenjem socialnih stroškov v zvezi s predčasnim upokojevanjem nekdanjih zaposlenih v družbi BAZAN.
This amount was paid to insurance companies in the years 2000 to 2002, which pay out the pensions.
Ta znesek je bil med letoma 2000 in 2002 izplačan zavarovalnim družbam, ki izplačujejo pokojnine.
The increased costs for these commitments explains, according to Spain, the additional capital injections from SEPI to IZAR in 2001 and 2002.
Povečani stroški za te prispevke, trdi Španija, so razlog za dodatne denarne zneske s strani družbe SEPI, namenjene družbi IZAR v letih 2001 in 2002.
In addition, a further approximately EUR […] million had been paid for such social costs directly from BAZAN to some pre-retired employees.
Poleg tega je BAZAN neposredno izplačal še približno […] milijonov EUR za take socialne stroške nekaterim predčasno upokojenim zaposlenim.
The rest of the capital injected was, according to Spain, needed to cover investments in the military areas of the new company IZAR, amounting to EUR […] million, and for an increased need for working capital for military constructions.
Preostali vloženi kapital je bil, kot pravi Španija, potreben za naložbe na vojaških območjih nove družbe IZAR v višini […] milijonov EUR in za povečano potrebo po obratnih sredstvih za vojaške objekte.
Spain also stated that these measures should be analysed within the context of Article 296 of the EC Treaty, since the capital was provided to BAZAN, which according to Spain was a purely military company at the time of the injection of the capital.
Španija je izjavila tudi, da je te ukrepe treba analizirati v okviru člena 296 Pogodbe ES, saj je kapital prejel BAZAN, ki je bil po mnenju Španije v času vlaganja kapitala povsem vojaška družba.
Spain furthermore argued against the possibility that some of the aid authorised in 1997 would become incompatible in case the Commission would declare that further illegal aid has been provided to the public Spanish shipyards.
Prav tako je Španija nastopila proti možnosti, da bi del pomoči, odobrene v letu 1997, postal neskladen, če bi Komisija izjavila, da je bila španskim javnim ladjedelnicam zagotovljena nadaljnja nezakonita pomoč.
In reaction to the comments provided by third parties Spain fully agrees with all that was stated by IZAR, and denies that IZAR has an important activity in the luxury yacht sector.
V odgovoru na pripombe, ki so jih predložile tretje stranke, se Španija povsem strinja z vsem, kar je izjavil IZAR, in zanika, da bi IZAR izvajal pomembno dejavnost v sektorju luksuznih jaht.
Spain at a later stage of the procedure provided further information requested by the Commission, i.e. the estimated losses of the civil activities of IZAR, from 1 July 2000 to 31 December 2003 and information on the overhead costs of IZAR during this period.
Španija je na kasnejši stopnji postopka predložila nadaljnje podatke, ki jih je zahtevala Komisija, npr. oceno izgub civilne dejavnosti družbe IZAR med 1. julijem 2000 in 31. decembrom 2003 ter podatke o režijskih stroških družbe IZAR v tem obdobju.
LEGAL BASE
PRAVNA PODLAGA
According to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, any aid granted by a Member State or through State resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between Member States, be incompatible with the common market.
V skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES je s skupnim trgom neskladna kakršna koli pomoč države članice ali pomoč prek državnih sredstev v kakršni koli obliki, ki izkrivlja konkurenco ali grozi, da bo izkrivila konkurenco, ker daje prednost nekaterim podjetjem ali proizvodnji nekaterega blaga, kolikor to vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami.
Pursuant to the established case-law of the European Courts, the criterion of trade being affected is met if the recipient firm carries out an economic activity involving trade between Member States.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso evropskih sodišč je merilo prizadete trgovine izpolnjeno, če podjetje, ki prejme pomoč, izvaja gospodarsko dejavnost, ki vključuje trgovino med državami članicami.
According to Article 87(3)(e) of the EC Treaty, categories of aid specified by a decision of the Council acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission may be considered compatible with the common market.
V skladu s členom 87(3)(e) Pogodbe ES lahko štejejo kategorije pomoči, ki jih je Svet določil v odločbi, sprejeti s kvalificirano večino na predlog Komisije, za usklajene s skupnim trgom.
The Commission notes that the Council adopted on this basis Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 (hereafter the Shipbuilding Regulation), which was in force from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2003.
Komisija opozarja, da je Svet na tej osnovi sprejel Uredbo (ES) št. 1540/98 (v nadaljevanju „Uredba o ladjedelništvu“), ki je veljala od 1. januarja 1999 do 31. decembra 2003.
Although Regulation (EC) No 1540/98 expired on 31 December 2003, and is not concerned by the Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid [8], in the interest of a consistent practice the Commission — using its broad margin of appreciation — intends to apply that Regulation in the present case.
Čeprav je Uredba (ES) št. 1540/98 prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2003 in obvestilo Komisije o določitvi veljavnih pravil za oceno nezakonite državne pomoči nanjo ne vpliva [8], namerava Komisija zaradi ustaljene prakse – ob uporabljanju svojih širokih meja pri ocenjevanju – uporabiti to uredbo v trenutnem primeru.
Therefore, aid to shipbuilding falls within the scope of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Zato sodi pomoč ladjedelništvu v področje člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission notes that according to the Shipbuilding Regulation, ‘shipbuilding’ means building of self-propelled seagoing commercial vessels.
Komisija opozarja, da „ladjedelništvo“ v skladu z Uredbo o ladjedelništvu pomeni gradnjo samovoznih morskih trgovskih plovil.
The Commission further notes that IZAR builds these ships and that consequently it is an undertaking covered by the Regulation.
Komisija prav tako opozarja, da IZAR gradi takšne ladje in da gre zato za podjetje, ki ga ureja Uredba.
The Commission further notes that Article 2 of the said Regulation states that aid granted for shipbuilding, ship repair and ship conversion may be compatible with the common market only if it complies with the provisions of the Regulation.
Komisija prav tako opozarja, da člen 2 navedene uredbe določa, da je pomoč za ladjedelništvo, popravila ali predelave ladij s skupnim trgom usklajena le, če je v skladu z določbami Uredbe.
This provision applies not only to aid granted to undertakings engaged in such activities but also to related entities.
Ta določba ne velja le za pomoč podjetjem, ki se ukvarjajo s takimi dejavnostmi, ampak tudi za pomoč sorodnim subjektom.
In August 1997, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1013/97, the Commission exceptionally approved a package of restructuring aids for the Spanish public civil shipyards in order for them to return to viability by the end of 1998.
Komisija je avgusta 1997 v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/97 izjemoma odobrila paket pomoči za prestrukturiranje španskim civilnim ladjedelnicam, da bi se do konca leta 1998 ponovno ekonomsko usposobile.
Including aids previously approved, the total package was ESP 318 billion (EUR 1,9 billion).
Celotni paket je vključno s prej odobrenimi pomočmi obsegal 318 milijard pezet (1,9 milijarde EUR).
In giving its agreement, the Council stressed the ‘one time, last time’ nature of the aid package.
Svet je pri podaji svojega soglasja poudaril, da gre pri tem paketu pomoči za „prvič in zadnjič“.
The Spanish government had undertaken the commitment that the yards would not receive any further aid for restructuring, rescue, loss compensation or privatisation.
Španska vlada se je obvezala, da ladjedelnice ne bodo prejemale nobene nadaljnje pomoči za prestrukturiranje, reševanje, nadomestilo za izgube ali privatizacijo.
This was reflected in the conditions attached to the Commission's decision approving the aid.
To je bilo razvidno iz pogojev, ki so bili priloženi odločbi Komisije o odobritvi pomoči.
It was also underlined in the first indent of the second subparagraph of Article 5(1) of the Shipbuilding Regulation.
To je bilo poudarjeno tudi v prvi alinei drugega pododstavka člena 5(1) Uredbe o ladjedelništvu.
This provision states that no rescue or restructuring aid may be granted to an undertaking that has been granted such aid pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1013/97.
Ta določba navaja, da se podjetju, ki mu je že bila zagotovljena pomoč za reševanje ali prestrukturiranje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1013/97, ne zagotovi take pomoči.
As a consequence, aid in excess of the aid that was authorised by the initial Commission decision of August 1997 would have to be considered as incompatible with the common market, unless approved under another legal base.
Tako bi se pomoč, ki je prekoračila okvir pomoči, odobrene s prvotno odločbo Komisije avgusta 1997, morala šteti za neusklajeno s skupnim trgom, razen če bi bila odobrena na drugi pravni podlagi.
The Commission notes that the shipyards Sestao, Puerto Real, Sevilla, Cadiz, and Juliana were undertakings covered by Regulation (EC) No 1013/97 and the 1997 Commission decision referred to above.
Komisija opozarja, da so bile ladjedelnice Sestao, Puerto Real, Sevilla, Cadiz in Juliana podjetja, ki sta jih urejali Uredba (ES) št. 1013/97 in odločba Komisije iz leta 1997, na katero se sklicuje zgoraj.