natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The information that Transavia operates to all relevant Martinair destinations is also relevant for the assessment of the amount of actual competition between Martinair and Transavia, in particular if seen in the context of the parties' repeated statements that Martinair's and Transavia's operations are complementary [37].
Podatek, da posluje Transavia v vseh pomembnih namembnih krajih potovanja podjetja Martinair, je prav tako pomemben pri oceni dejanske konkurence med Martinairom in Transavio, zlasti če na to gledamo v smislu ponovnih izjav strank o tem, da se poslovanje Martinaira in poslovanje Transavie dopolnjuje [37].
The information that Transavia is operating towards many major holiday destinations scheduled and charter services in parallel is also clearly of importance in order to assess Transavia's market position.
Podatek, da je poslovanje Transavie usmerjeno k številnim pomembnim rednim počitniškim namembnim krajem in k vzporednim čarterskim storitvam, je prav tako pomemben pri ocenjevanju tržnega položaja Transavie.
Regardless of whether or not seats sold on scheduled flights form part of the relevant product market, the information that Transavia has substantial scheduled operations to its charter destinations is relevant to an assessment of the market strength of Transavia on those routes.
Ne glede na to, ali prodane karte na rednih letih oblikujejo del upoštevanega proizvodnega trga, je podatek o tem, da ima Transavia precejšen del rednega poslovanja pri svojih čarterskih namembnih krajih, pomemben pri ocenjevanju tržne moči Transavie na teh linijah.
mitigating factors invoked by KLM
Olajševalne okoliščine, na katere se sklicuje KLM
KLM emphasises that it had several meetings with the Commission in order to prepare the notification, that it discussed several drafts of the notification in those meetings and that it complied in good faith with the suggestions and remarks made by the Commission.
KLM poudarja, da je imel s Komisijo več srečanj glede priprave priglasitve, da so na teh srečanjih razpravljali o različnih osnutkih priglasitve in da je v dobri veri upošteval predloge in pripombe Komisije.
It also points out that the notification in this matter was very complex because of the lack of readily available data.
Poleg tega poudarja, da je bila priglasitev o tej zadevi izjemno zapletena zaradi pomanjkanja razpoložljivih podatkov.
KLM further states that it is not proven that it provided ‘incorrect or misleading’ information, or that at any rate, in view of the particular circumstances of the case, any such provision cannot be taken as grounds for the imposition of a fine.
KLM tudi navaja, da ni bilo dokazano, da je posredoval „netočne in zavajajoče“ podatke in da ob upoštevanju določenih okoliščin v tem primeru takšno posredovanje v nobeni meri ne more biti razlog za uvedbo globe.
The Commission cannot share this view for the reasons set out below.
Komisija se ne more strinjati s tem stališčem zaradi razlogov, navedenih spodaj.
Transavia's charter destinations
Čarterski namembni kraji Transavie
In its comments on the statement of objections, KLM explains the omission of the Transavia charter destinations as the result of an administrative error [38].
KLM v svojih pripombah pojasnjuje ugotovitve o možnih kršitvah, in sicer da je izpust čarterskih namembnih krajev Transavie posledica administrativne napake [38].
KLM further argues that the mistake should have been evident to anybody examining the notification.
KLM ugovarja, da bi morala biti napaka očitna vsakomur, ki bi pregledoval priglasitev.
KLM argues that the table in question was only included in the text of Form CO at the request of the Commission and that for the ongoing summer season 1998 detailed market share data were not yet available.
KLM ugovarja, da je bila zadevna tabela na prošnjo Komisije vključena le v besedilo obrazca CO in da za poletno sezono 1998, ki je bila še v teku, podrobni podatki o tržnem deležu še niso bili na voljo.
However, the table on page 40 of the notification is not presented as an addendum or an update to the information contained in the SH&E study referred to in paragraph 26 of this Decision.
Vendar pa tabela na strani 40 priglasitve ni prisotna kot dopolnilo ali posodobitev podatkov, ki jih vsebuje študija podjetja SH&E iz odstavka 26 tega sklepa.
It is an illustration following the KLM's statement that Transavia's and Martinair's activities are ‘to a large extent complementary’.
Gre za ponazoritev, ki je sledila izjavi KLM o tem, da se dejavnosti Transavie in Martinaira „v veliki meri dopolnjujejo“.
KLM's claim that this table could only have been read in conjunction with the study is unfounded as there is not even a reference to the study.
Trditve KLM o tem, da bi bilo to tabelo mogoče prebrati samo skupaj s študijo, so neutemeljene, saj v tabeli ni nobenega sklicevanja na študijo.
KLM's claim that the incorrectness of the table was obvious is also unfounded.
Prav tako so neutemeljene trditve KLM o tem, da so bile netočnosti v tabeli očitne.
If the omission of the charter destinations in question was not detected by KLM, which has a much better knowledge of its activities than anybody else, it was certainly not such an obvious mistake that it could have been detected by any careful reader.
Če KLM, ki je veliko bolje poznala svoje dejavnosti kot kdor koli drug, ni opazila izpusta zadevnih čarterskih namembnih krajev, potem to jasno ni bila tako očitna napaka, ki bi jo lahko opazil vsak natančen bralec.
KLM emphasises that it was not its intention to withhold that information from the Commission and that the seriousness of its administrative error is exaggerated by the Commission.
KLM poudarja, da Komisiji ni nameravala zamolčati teh podatkov in da je Komisija pretiravala glede teže te administrativne napake.
However, the explanation of how KLM collected the information on Transavia's charter destinations shows a large degree of carelessness.
Vendar pa razlaga načina, na katerega je KLM zbiral podatke o čarterskih namembnih krajih Transavie, razkriva veliko mero površnosti.
To base the information on an in-flight magazine and not on a more reliable source shows a grave neglect of the duty to select carefully the necessary information, particularly in view of the fact that Transavia is a fully controlled subsidiary.
Če podatki temeljijo na reviji letalskega prevoznika in ne na bolj zanesljivih virih, to razkriva veliko zanemarjanje dolžnosti o pazljivi izbiri potrebnih podatkov, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je Transavia v celoti nadzorovana hčerinska družba.
Transavia's scheduled operations
Redni leti Transavie
KLM argues that it never made a secret in its contacts with the Commission of the fact that the KLM Group, including its subsidiary Transavia, operates scheduled flights in Europe in general and to the Mediterranean in particular.
KLM ugovarja, da v svojih stikih s Komisijo ni nikoli skrival dejstva, da skupina KLM, vključno z njeno hčerinsko družbo Transavia, opravlja redne lete v Evropi in zlasti v namembne kraje v Sredozemlju.
It also states that it would have provided more information on Transavia's scheduled flights if the Commission had requested it during the pre-notification talks.
Poleg tega navaja, da bi posredoval več podatkov o rednih poletih Transavie, če bi jih Komisija zahtevala med pogovori pred priglasitvijo.
KLM refers to the SH&E study which it claims makes it clear that 47 % of all Dutch holiday-makers go on vacation on a scheduled flight.
KLM se sklicuje na študijo podjetja SH&E, za katero meni, da je jasno pokazala, da 47 % vseh nizozemskih dopustnikov potuje z rednimi leti.
KLM states that it would be inconceivable that a large proportion of these passengers would not be attributed to the KLM group.
KLM navaja, da bi bilo nepojmljivo, če ne bi pripisali velikega dela teh potnikov skupini KLM.
The discussions in the prenotification meetings were principally concerned with clarifying the market definition.
Razprave na srečanjih pred priglasitvijo so bile osredotočene na razjasnitev določanja trga.
The Commission accepts that since KLM did not explain that Transavia had substantial sales of seats on its scheduled flights to package tour operators, the Commission did not initially contemplate taking those activities into account for market definition purposes.
Ker KLM ni pojasnil, da je Transavia prodala znatno število kart na svojih rednih letih organizatorjem paketnih potovanj, se Komisija strinja, da na začetku ni razmišljala o tem, da bi upoštevala te dejavnosti za namene določanja trga.
This does not, however, remove the obligation of KLM to include full information on those activities, at least in response to Question 6.2 of Form CO [39].
Vendar pa to ne odvezuje KLM, da ne vključi vseh podatkov o teh dejavnostih, vsaj v obliki odgovora na vprašanje 6.2 v obrazcu CO [39].
Furthermore, the information given in the SH&E study relates to all Dutch holiday-makers and not just to customers who buy a package tour from a tour operator.
Poleg tega pa so podatki, podani v študiji podjetja SH&E, povezani z vsemi nizozemskimi dopustniki in ne samo s strankami, ki od organizatorjev potovanj kupijo paketno potovanje.
It was therefore not possible to deduce from that information that Transavia sold seats on its scheduled flights to package tour operators.
Zato iz teh podatkov ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da je Transavia prodala karte za redne lete organizatorjem paketnih potovanj.
The way in which the information on Transavia was presented in all drafts submitted was not likely to prompt such questions on the part of the Commission.
Komisija zaradi načina predstavitve podatkov o Transavii v vseh predloženih osnutkih najverjetneje ne bi zastavila takšnih vprašanj.
Transavia was always presented as a ‘charter operator’.
Transavia je bila vedno predstavljena kot „ponudnik čarterskih letov“.
The information that Transavia also operates scheduled flights was only given in the final version of the notification in footnote 11 on page 45, which concerns the participation of Transavia in the KLM frequent flyer scheme.
Podatek o tem, da Transavia opravlja tudi redne lete, je bil podan samo v zadnji različici priglasitve v sprotni opombi 11 na strani 45, ki se nanaša na sodelovanje Transavie pri shemi pogostih letalskih potnikov KLM.
That information was not contained in earlier drafts.
Tega podatka ni bilo v prejšnjih osnutkih.
The argument that the Commission could, or should, have asked for that information is therefore unfounded.
Trditev o tem, da bi Komisija lahko, oziroma da bi morala zahtevati te podatke, je zato neutemeljena.
KLM further claims that the information on scheduled flights did not change KLM's market share and that therefore the omission of that information was irrelevant.
KLM trdi tudi, da podatki o rednih poletih niso spremenili tržnega deleža KLM in da je bilo dejstvo, da je bil ta podatek izpuščen, nepomembno.
However, the actual market share of a company is only one element to measure its market strength.
Kljub temu pa je dejanski tržni delež podjetja samo en element za določitev tržne moči.
The operation by Transavia of scheduled services to destinations which it also serves on a charter basis is clearly a factor which can contribute to its strength on those routes and is therefore relevant to the Commission's assessment of competition in connection with the merger.
Poslovanje Transavie z rednimi leti v namembne kraje, ki jih ponuja tudi na čarterski osnovi, je jasno dejavnik, ki lahko prispeva k njeni moči na teh linijah in je zato pomemben dejavnik pri ocenjevanju konkurence s strani Komisije v povezavi z združitvijo.
Accordingly, the Commission's substantive assessment of the case, and the nature and scope of any remedies that may be required, is likely to be affected by its knowledge (or lack of knowledge) of the existence of those operations and of their nature and extent.
Tako bi na vsebinsko ocenjevanje primera, na naravo in obseg sredstev, za katere bi lahko zahtevala Komisija, vplivalo poznavanje (ali nepoznavanje) obstoja takšnega poslovanja in njegove narave ali obsega.
For example, if it were really the case that Transavia had no scheduled operations to those destinations, it might be argued that it would be relatively easy for other scheduled airlines to commence such operations, selling seats to individuals and to tour operators, and that in consequence the merger should be allowed.
Če bi bilo na primer res, da Transavia ni imela rednih letov v te namembne kraje, bi lahko trdili, da bi drugi redni letalski prevozniki sorazmerno preprosto začeli s takšnim poslovanjem, s prodajo kart posameznikom in organizatorjem potovanj in da bi morala biti posledično združitev dovoljena.
Similarly, if a possible dominant position were found to exist on some of the routes concerned, a remedy which focused exclusively on Martinair's operations, or Transavia's charter operations, might be insufficient, since it would not affect or take into account the substantial sales to tour operators which Transavia makes on its scheduled flights on those routes.
Poleg tega ukrep, ki bi se osredotočil izključno na poslovanje Martinaira ali na čarterske lete Transavie, v primeru odkritja obstoja možnega prevladujočega položaja na zadevnih linijah ne bi bil zadosten, saj ne bi vplival na znatno prodajo organizatorjem potovanj, ki jih Transavia opravlja na svojih rednih letih na teh linijah.
Amount of the fine
Višina globe
In proceedings initiated under the Merger Regulation, it is very important that the parties to the merger supply full information in submitting the notification.
Pri postopkih, ki so sproženi v skladu z Uredbo o združitvah, je izjemno pomembno, da stranke, udeležene pri združitvi, posredujejo pri predložitvi priglasitve popolne podatke.
These constraints mean that firms must be particularly careful in submitting details of their merger.
Te obveznosti pomenijo, da morajo biti podjetja še zlasti previdna pri predložitvi podrobnosti glede združitve.
In the present case KLM supplied information which was incorrect and misleading and KLM was at the very least, grossly negligent.
V tem primeru je KLM posredoval podatke, ki so bili netočni in zavajajoči, in najmanj, kar lahko rečemo, je, da je bil KLM izjemno malomaren.
Furthermore, the information was clearly relevant for the competitive assessment of the operation.
Poleg tega pa so bili ti podatki očitno pomembni pri oceni konkurence poslovanja.
KLM provided the correct information not on its own initiative but only as a result of the Commission's investigation.
KLM ni posredoval točnih podatkov na lastno pobudo, ampak le zaradi preiskave Komisije.
Complete information on the additional Transavia charter destinations could only be derived from information provided in a response to a request for information and was finally confirmed orally.
Vse podatke o dodatnih čarterskih namembnih krajev Transavie je bilo mogoče razbrati le iz podatkov, ki so bili posredovani v odgovor na zahtevo po teh podatkih, kar je bilo na koncu potrjeno ustno.
The information that Transavia operates scheduled flights to Mediterranean destinations was given as a result of a request for information.
Podatek, da Transavia opravlja redne lete v namembne kraje v Sredozemlju, je bil podan kot posledica zahteve po podatkih.
The fact that KLM sells seats on its scheduled flights to tour operators under the same economic conditions as for its charter flights, and the importance of that activity, was only fully confirmed in the notification of 21 December 1998 and the Commission's subsequent investigation of the information contained in that notification.
Dejstvo, da KLM organizatorjem potovanj prodaja sedeže na rednih letih pod enakimi gospodarskimi razmerami kot pri čarterskih letih, in pomen te dejavnosti sta bila v celoti potrjena šele v priglasitvi z dne 21. decembra 1998 in v nadaljnji preiskavi Komisije o podatkih iz tega obvestila.
In assessing the conduct of KLM, it must also be borne in mind that KLM is a large European company with significant business in Europe.
Pri ocenjevanju ravnanja KLM moramo upoštevati tudi to, da je KLM velika evropska družba, ki levji delež storitev opravlja v Evropi.
KLM also had prior experience of a notification under the Merger Regulation.
KLM je poleg tega imel predhodne izkušnje glede priglasitve v skladu z Uredbo o združitvah.
In mitigation, KLM has claimed, in summary and as more fully described in paragraphs 47 to 55, that the alleged infringements were not deliberate, that the Commission should have been able to identify the missing information and request it during the prenotification period (which in this instance was quite extensive) and that the missing information was not decisive for the outcome of the case.
KLM je kot olajševalne okoliščine v povzetku in obširneje v odstavkih od 47 do 55 navedel, da domnevne kršitve niso bile namerne, da bi Komisija morala odkriti manjkajoče podatke in jih zahtevati v obdobju pred priglasitvijo (ki je bilo v tem primeru izjemno dolgo) in da manjkajoči podatki niso bili odločujočega pomena za izid primera.
In the Commission's view, only limited weight can be attached to those claims as regards their impact on the gravity of the infringement and hence on the amount of the fine that should be imposed.
Komisija meni, da lahko tem trditvam pripišemo omejeno težo v zvezi z njihovim vplivom na resnost kršitve in posledično na znesek globe, ki bi jo bilo treba naložiti.
There is no evidence that the infringements were intentional, and KLM's participation in prenotification contacts with the Commission indicates, at the least, a desire to ensure that its notification was acceptable.
Nobenega dokaza ni, da je bila kršitev namerna, sodelovanje KLM pri stikih s Komisijo pred priglasitvijo pa pomeni, da je pokazal vsaj željo po tem, da bi bila njegova priglasitev sprejemljiva.
Nevertheless, the responsibility for ensuring that all relevant information was provided was KLM's, and it failed to exercise due care in carrying that task out.
Kljub temu je bil KLM odgovoren za posredovanje vseh ustreznih podatkov, pri opravljanju te naloge pa ni ravnal dovolj natančno.
The degree of negligence associated with the infringements is very substantial, in both instances.
Stopnja malomarnosti, ki je povezana s kršitvami, je v obeh primerih znatna.
KLM should not have relied on an in-flight magazine for crucial information such as that concerning Transavia's charter destinations.
KLM se pri ključnih podatkih, na primer glede čarterskih namembnih krajev Transavie, ne bi smel zanašati na revijo letalskega prevoznika.
It could have provided the information about Transavia's scheduled flights, and should have appreciated the importance of doing so, even in the absence of a specific request or reminder from the Commission.
Lahko bi posredoval podatke o rednih letih Transavie, poleg tega pa bi moral spoštovati pomen takšnega ravnanja, tudi v odsotnosti posebne zahteve ali opozorila Komisije.
Moreover it is certainly possible that if the Commission had failed to identify either element of the missing information, its continued absence would have affected the substantive decision on the merger, and in ways which could have benefited KLM.
Če Komisija ni odkrila nobenega elementa manjkajočih podatkov, je prav zagotovo mogoče, da bi nadaljnji manjkajoči podatki vplivali na vsebinsko odločitev glede združitve, in to na način, od katerega bi KLM lahko imel koristi.
On the basis of the above, and taking account of the circumstances in the case, the Commission considers it appropriate to impose a fine of EUR 40000 on KLM, pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.
Na osnovi zgornjega in ob upoštevanju okoliščin v tem primeru Komisija meni, da bi bilo za KLM primerno naložiti globo v višini 40000 EUR v skladu s členom 14(1)(b) Uredbe o združitvah –
A fine of EUR 40000 is hereby imposed on Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM) pursuant to Article 14(1)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 for having supplied incorrect and misleading information in the notification submitted to the Commission under that Regulation on 1 September 1998.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM) se v skladu s členom 14(1)(b) Uredbe (EGS) št. 4064/89 naloži globa v višini 40000 EUR, ker je Komisiji pri priglasitvi po tisti uredbi 1. septembra 1998 predložil netočne in zavajajoče podatke.
The fine referred to in Article 1 shall be paid within three months of the date of notification of this Decision into bank account No 310-0933000-43 of the European Commission, Banque Bruxelles Lambert, Agence Européenne, Rond Point Schuman 5, B-1040 Brussels
Globo iz člena 1 je treba plačati v treh mesecih od datuma uradne obvestitve te odločbe, in sicer na bančni račun št. 310-0933000-43 Evropske komisije, Banque Bruxelles Lambert, Agence Européenne, Rond Point Schuman 5, B-1040 Bruxelles
After the expiry of that period, interest shall be automatically payable at the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its repo operations on the first working day of the month in which this Decision is adopted, that is 3 %, plus 3,5 percentage points, making 6,5 %.
Po poteku tega obdobja se plačajo obresti samodejno po obrestni meri, ki jo uporablja Evropska centralna banka za posle repo, na prvi delovni dan v mesecu, v katerem je bila sprejeta ta odločba, kar znaša 3 % plus 3,5 odstotne točke, kar je skupaj 6,5 %.
This Decision is addressed to:
Ta odločba je naslovljena na:
Done at Brussels, 14 December 1999.
V Bruslju, 14. decembra 1999
For the Commission
Za Komisijo,
Case No IV/M.1128 — KLM/Martinair (OJ C 281, 10.9.1998, p. 7).
Primer št. IV/M.1128 – KLM/Martinair (UL C 281, 10.9.1998, str. 7).
OJ C 298, 26.9.1998, p. 8.
UL C 298, 26.9.1998, str. 8.
Case No IV/M.1328 — KLM/Martinair (OJ C 408, 29.12.1998, p. 8).
Primer št. IV/M.1328 – KLM/Martinair (UL C 408, 29.12.1998, str. 8).
OJ C 42, 17.2.1999, p. 9.
UL C 42, 17.2.1999, str. 9.
Page 26 of the notification.
Stran 26 priglasitve.
The timetable ‘Charter flights summer 1998’ was provided as Annex III to a response ( 9 September 1998) to a request for information (4 September 1998).
Vozni red „Čarterski leti poletje 1998“ je bil predložen kot Priloga III k odgovoru ( 9. septembra 1998) na zahtevo po podatkih (4. septembra 1998).
The timetable also mentions destinations in Malta and Croatia.
V voznem redu so prav tako navedeni namembni kraji na Malti in na Hrvaškem.
Annex I to the same response contains a listing of the number of stretches of Transavia non-scheduled flights to Mediterranian destinations from the Netherlands (55 destinations) and the number of stretches out of the rest of Europe to Mediterranian destinations (22 destinations).
Priloga I k istemu odgovoru vsebuje seznam prog čarterskih poletov Transavie v sredozemske namembne kraje iz Nizozemske (55 namembnih krajev) in število prog iz ostanka Evrope v sredozemske namembne kraje (22 namembnih krajev).
This listing also contains these and additional destinations but no destinations in Israel, Morocco and Tunisia.
Seznam prav tako vsebuje te in dodatne namembne kraje, vendar nobenega namembnega kraja v Izraelu, Maroku in Tuniziji.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Deli tega besedila so urejeni tako, da se ne razkrijejo zaupni podatki; ti deli so v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
In order to determine its market share in the market for charter flights to the Mediterranean, KLM has used a very wide geographic market definition.
Da bi lahko določila tržni delež na trgu čarterskih poletov v Sredozemlje, je KLM uporabil zelo široko geografsko definicijo trga.
KLM states that the planes of the parties and of other charter companies can operate from each airport in the Benelux, the United Kingdom and Germany.
KLM navaja, da lahko letala strank in drugih čarterskih podjetij delujejo z vseh letališč v državah Beneluksa, Združenem kraljestvu in Nemčiji.
On this basis a market share of […] (*) % is calculated (page 61).
Na tej osnovi znaša tržni delež […] (*) % (stran 61).