natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In particular, the complaint alleged that these practices were inconsistent with Articles III and XI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994).
V pritožbi je bilo še zlasti navedeno, da te prakse niso v skladu s členoma III in IX Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini („GATT 1994“).
On that basis, the complainant asked the Commission to take the necessary action.
Na tej osnovi je pritožnik zaprosil, da Komisija ustrezno ukrepa.
The complaint contained sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a Community examination procedure pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Pritožba je vsebovala dovolj dokazov, da upraviči začetek postopka preverjanja Skupnosti v skladu s členom 8(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
Consequently, the Commission initiated the procedure after consulting with the Member States in the framework of the Advisory Committee, on 7 January 2004 [3].
Komisija je posledično 7. januarja 2004 [3] sprožila postopek, potem ko se je posvetovala z državami članicami v okviru svetovalnega odbora.
Following the initiation of the examination procedure, the Commission carried out an investigation.
Po začetku postopka preverjanja je Komisija opravila preiskavo.
The investigation concerned an alleged import ban and financial penalties relating to imported retreaded tyres.
Preiskava je zajela domnevno prepoved uvoza in denarne kazni v zvezi z uvoženimi protektiranimi gumami.
The investigation considered the relevant Brazilian legislation relating to the import ban and the imposition of financial penalties, and equally took into account the views expressed by the various Brazilian Government Ministries, as well as Brazilian trade associations.
Preiskava je zajela ustrezno brazilsko zakonodajo v zvezi s prepovedjo uvoza in uvedbo denarnih kazni ter je enakovredno upoštevala mnenja, ki so jih izrazila različna brazilska vladna ministrstva in brazilska trgovinska združenja.
The investigation concluded that the Brazilian measures under investigation are inconsistent with several provisions of GATT 1994, specifically Articles I:1, III:4, XI:1 and XIII:1, and are not justified under Article XX of GATT 1994, the Enabling Clause or other applicable instruments of international law.
Preiskava je pokazala, da brazilski preiskovani ukrepi niso v skladu z vrsto določb GATT 1994, še zlasti s členi I:1, III:4, XI:1 in XIII:1, in niso upravičeni v skladu s členom XX GATT 1994, pooblastilno klavzulo in drugimi veljavnimi instrumenti mednarodnega prava.
Since the WTO Agreement prohibits the challenged practices, there is evidence of an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Ker sporazum STO prepoveduje dvomljive prakse, obstajajo dokazi za trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
The investigation showed that Brazil was an important market for European manufactures of retreaded tyres prior to the introduction of the ban on 25 September 2000.
Preiskava je pokazala, da je bila Brazilija pomemben trg za evropske proizvajalce protektiranih gum pred uvedbo prepovedi 25. septembra 2000.
In the period 1995 to 2000 exports of retreaded tyres to Brazil for passenger cars rose at an average of 58 % and for the first time in the six-year period dropped by 32 % in 2001, i.e. after the imposition of the ban.
V obdobju 1995–2000 se je izvoz protektiranih gum za osebne avtomobile v Brazilijo povprečno povečal za 58 % in v letu 2001, tj. po uvedbi prepovedi, prvič v šestih letih upadel za 32 %.
Whilst exports continued after the ban’s imposition, either on account of import licenses that were still in circulation, or as result of legal challenge by some importers through the Brazilian courts, it is evident that the market was gradually being closed off to European exporters.
Po uvedbi prepovedi se je izvoz bodisi po zaslugi uvoznih dovoljenj, ki so bila še vedno v obtoku, bodisi kot posledica pravne preveritve, ki so jo nekateri uvozniki opravili pri brazilskih sodiščih, sicer nadaljeval, vendar je očitno, da se je trg za evropske izvoznike postopoma zapiral.
Whilst many of the Community exporters were eventually able to find new markets, they were still unable to compensate for what had been a large proportion of their export revenue.
Četudi je veliko izvoznikov Skupnosti na koncu vendarle našlo nove trge, še vedno niso mogli nadomestiti visokega deleža svojih izvoznih prihodkov iz Brazilije.
Not all were successful in finding new markets, or in creating new lines of retreaded tyre for specialist vehicles (4×4, sports, etc.) and therefore the ban, combined with other factors (late payment by the Brazilian importer, exchange-rate fluctuations) drove some Community producers into receivership.
Vsi niso bili uspešni pri iskanju novih trgov ali pri uvajanju nove proizvodne linije protektiranih gum za posebna vozila (4×4, športna itd.), zato je prepoved skupaj z drugimi dejavniki (zapoznela plačila brazilskih uvoznikov, tečajna nihanja) privedla nekatere proizvajalce Skupnosti do stečaja.
The evidence clearly shows that Community industry has suffered and continues to suffer adverse effects within the meaning of Article 2(4) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Dokazi jasno kažejo, da je industrija Skupnosti utrpela in še vedno trpi zaradi škodljivih učinkov v smislu člena 2(4) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
Export data and the replies to the questionnaires sent by the Commission to European producers and exporters of retreaded tyres support Community industry’s claim that Brazil had been an important export market prior to the imposition of the ban and that they had anticipated annual sales reaching 3 million units by the end of 2002.
Podatki o izvozu in odgovori na vprašalnike, ki jih je Komisija poslala evropskim proizvajalcem in izvoznikom protektiranih gum, potrjujejo trditev te gospodarske panoge Skupnosti, da je bila Brazilija pomemben izvozni trg pred uvedbo prepovedi in da je pričakovala letno prodajo, ki naj bi dosegla 3 milijone kosov do konca leta 2002.
The evidence also corroborates their claim that they have been suffering for the past three years as a result of the Brazilian import ban.
Dokazi tudi podpirajo njeno trditev, da je v zadnjih treh letih utrpela škodo zaradi brazilske prepovedi uvoza.
In some instances, companies which were unable to find new export markets went into liquidation.
V nekaterih primerih so bila podjetja, ki niso mogla najti novih izvoznih trgov, likvidirana.
On the basis of the above, it can be concluded that it is in the Community’s interest in the sense of Article 12(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation to take action, within the WTO framework, to seek a rapid removal of the Brazilian import ban on retreaded tyres, which represents a breach of fundamental WTO rules and an obstacle to trade in the sense of Article 2(1) of the Trade Barriers Regulation.
Glede na navedeno je mogoče ugotoviti, da je v smislu člena 12(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah v interesu Skupnosti, da se v okviru STO ukrepa v prizadevanju za hitro odpravo brazilske prepovedi uvoza protektiranih gum, kar predstavlja kršitev temeljnih pravil STO in trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe o trgovinskih ovirah.
It is of utmost importance for the Community to ensure that WTO partners fully comply with their obligations, just as the Community is required to do.
Za Skupnost je nadvse pomembno zagotoviti, da partnerji STO v polni meri spoštujejo svoje obveznosti, tako kakor se to zahteva od Skupnosti.
It is therefore fundamental for the good functioning of the multilateral trading system that this incompatibility with WTO rules should be addressed in that forum.
Zato je za dobro delovanje večstranskega trgovinskega sistema bistveno, da se neskladnosti s pravili STO obravnavajo v okviru navedenega foruma.
Attempts to resolve this dispute through numerous meetings with the Brazilian authorities since the imposition of the ban, and throughout the course of this investigation, have failed to identify a willingness on the part of the Brazilian authorities to reach a mutually agreed solution.
Poskusi, da bi se ta spor razrešil v okviru številnih sestankov z brazilskimi organi od uvedbe prepovedi in v celotnem času poteka te preiskave, niso pokazali pripravljenosti brazilskih oblasti za medsebojno dogovorjeno rešitev.
In the absence of any likelihood that the Brazilian position will change, the initiation of a procedure within the framework of the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes is therefore deemed necessary.
Ker ni verjetno, da se bo brazilsko stališče spremenilo, je potreben začetek postopka v okviru Sporazuma STO o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the TBR Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora TBR –
The Brazilian Government’s imposition of an import ban on retreaded tyres and the related financial penalties appear to be inconsistent with Brazil’s obligations under the Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organisation and, in particular, provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and constitutes an obstacle to trade within the meaning of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94.
Prepoved, ki jo je brazilska vlada uvedla na uvoz protektiranih gum, in s tem povezane denarne kazni se zdijo neskladne z brazilskimi obveznostmi v okviru Marakeškega sporazuma o ustanovitvi Svetovne trgovinske organizacije in zlasti z določbami Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini 1994 ter predstavlja trgovinsko oviro v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 3289/94.
The Community will initiate dispute settlement proceedings against Brazil under the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes and other relevant WTO provisions with a view to securing removal of the obstacle to trade.
Skupnost bo proti Braziliji sprožila postopke za poravnavo sporov v okviru Sporazuma o pravilih in postopkih poravnavanja sporov in drugih ustreznih določb STO za zagotovitev odprave trgovinske ovire.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 356/95 (OJ L 41, 23.2.1995, p. 3).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 356/95 (UL L 41, 23.2.1995, str. 3).
The proceeding concerns retreaded tyres falling under the codes 401211, 401212, 401213 and 401219 of the Combined Nomenclature.
Postopek zadeva protektirane gume, ki spadajo pod tarifne oznake 401211, 401212, 401213 in 401219 kombinirane nomenklature.
Retreaded tyres (also referred to as retreads) are tyres that are produced by removing the worn part of a used tyre and reconditioning it with a new tread.
Protektirane gume so gume, ki so proizvedene z odstranitvijo voznega dela rabljene gume in namestitvijo novega protektorja (plasti).
OJ C 3, 7.1.2004, p. 2.
UL C 3, 7.1.2004, str. 2.
amending Decision 1999/217/EC as regards the register of flavouring substances used in or on foodstuffs
o spremembah Odločbe Komisije 1999/217/ES o registru aromatičnih snovi, ki se uporabljajo v živilih ali na njih
(notified under document number C(2005) 1437)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1437)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 1996 laying down a Community procedure for flavouring substances used or intended for use in or on foodstuffs [1], and in particular Article 3(2) and Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2232/96 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. oktobra 1996 o določitvi postopka Skupnosti za aromatične snovi, uporabljene ali namenjene za uporabo v ali na živilih [1], in zlasti člena 3(2) in člena 4(3) Uredbe,
Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 lays down the procedure for the establishment of rules in respect of flavouring substances used or intended to be used in foodstuffs.
Uredba (ES) št. 2232/96 predvideva postopek za določitev pravil v zvezi z aromatičnimi snovmi, uporabljenimi ali namenjenimi za uporabo v ali na živilih.
That Regulation provides for the adoption of a register of flavouring substances (the register) following notification by the Member States of a list of the flavouring substances which may be used in or on foodstuffs marketed in their territory and on the basis of scrutiny by the Commission of that notification.
Navedena uredba predvideva sprejetje registra aromatičnih snovi („registra“) potem, ko so države članice poslale sporočilo s seznamom aromatičnih snovi, ki se lahko uporabljajo v ali na živilih, v prometu na njihovem ozemlju, in ko navedeno sporočilo Komisija podrobno pregleda.
That register was adopted by Commission Decision 1999/217/EC [2].
Navedeni register je bil sprejet z Odločbo Komisije 1999/217/ES [2].
In addition, Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 provides for a programme for the evaluation of flavouring substances in order to check whether they comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to that Regulation.
Poleg tega Uredba (ES) št. 2232/96 predvideva program ovrednotenja aromatičnih snovi, da bi lahko preverili, ali izpolnjujejo splošna merila za uporabo aromatičnih snovi, navedenih v Prilogi k navedeni uredbi.
The European Food Safety Authority (the Authority) concluded in its opinion of 13 July 2004 on para-hydroxybenzoates, that propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate (FL 09.915) had effects on sex hormones and the male reproductive organs in juvenile rats.
Evropska agencija za varno hrano („Agencija“) je v svojem mnenju z dne 13. julija 2004 o para-hidroksibenzoatih ugotovila, da propil 4-hidroksibenzoat (FL 09.915) učinkuje na spolne hormone in moške razmnoževalne organe pri mladih podganah.
The Authority was unable to recommend an acceptable daily intake (ADI) for this substance because of the lack of clear no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL).
Agencija ni mogla priporočiti sprejemljivega dnevnega vnosa (SDI) te snovi, ker ni bilo jasne ravni brez opaznega škodljivega učinka (NOAEL).
The use of propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate as a flavouring substance in food is not acceptable, as it does not comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96.
Uporaba propil 4-hidroksibenzoata kot aromatične snovi v hrani ni sprejemljiva, ker ne izpolnjuje splošnih meril za uporabo aromatičnih snovi, navedenih v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 2232/96.
As a consequence, propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate should be deleted from the register.
Posledično je treba propil 4-hidroksibenzoat črtati iz registra.
The Authority concluded in its opinion of 7 December 2004 on aliphatic dialcohols, diketones and hydroxyketones, that pentane-2,4-dione (FL 07.191) is genotoxic in vitro and in vivo.
Agencija je v svojem mnenju z dne 7. decembra 2004 o alifatskih dialkoholih, diketonih in hidroksiketonih ugotovila, da je pentan-2,4-dion (FL 07.191) genotoksičen in vitro in in vivo.
Accordingly, its use as a flavouring substance is not acceptable, because it does not comply with the general criteria for the use of flavouring substances set out in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2232/96.
V skladu s tem njegova uporaba kot aromatične snovi ni sprejemljiva, ker ne izpolnjuje splošnih meril za uporabo aromatičnih snovi, navedenih v Prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 2232/96.
As a consequence, pentane-2,4-dione should be deleted from the register.
Posledično je treba pentan-2,4-dion črtati iz registra.
In application of Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 and Commission Recommendation 98/282/EC of 21 April 1998 on the ways in which the Member States and the signatory States to the Agreement on the European Economic Area should protect intellectual property in connection with the development and manufacture of flavouring substances referred to in Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3], for a number of substances, the notifying Member States requested that they should be registered in such a way as to protect the intellectual property rights of the manufacturer.
Pri uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 2232/96 in Priporočila Komisije 98/282/ES z dne 21. aprila 1998 o načinih, kako morajo države članice in države podpisnice Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru varovati intelektualno lastnino v povezavi z razvojem in izdelavo aromatičnih snovi iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2232/96 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta [3] pri vrsti snovi, so države članice, ki pošljejo uradno obvestilo, zahtevale, da jih je treba registrirati tako, da se zavarujejo pravice intelektualne lastnine izdelovalca.
Protection for these substances, listed in Part B of the register, is limited to a maximum period of five years following the date of receipt of the notification.
Varstvo v zvezi s temi snovmi, navedenimi v delu B registra, je omejeno na obdobje največ pet let od datuma prejema obvestila.
That period has now expired for 28 substances which should consequently be transferred to Part A of the register.
Navedeno obdobje se je sedaj izteklo za 28 snovi, ki jih je posledično treba prenesti v del A registra.
Decision 1999/217/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Zato je treba Odločbo 1999/217/ES ustrezno spremeniti.
The Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 1999/217/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
OJ L 299, 23.11.1996, p. 1.
UL L 299, 23.11.1996, str. 1.
OJ L 84, 27.3.1999, p. 1.
UL L 84, 27.3.1999, str. 1.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/357/EC (OJ L 113, 20.4.2004, p. 28).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/357/ES (UL L 113, 20.4.2004, str. 28).
OJ L 127, 29.4.1998, p. 32.
UL L 127, 29.4.1998, str. 32.
The Annex to Decision 1999/217/EC is amended as follows:
Priloga k Odločbi 1999/217/ES se spremeni:
Part A is amended as follows:
Del A se spremeni:
The rows set out in the table for the substances attributed with FL-numbers 07.191 (pentane-2,4-dione) and 09.915 (propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate) are deleted.
Vrstici v preglednici za snovi, ki imata številki FL 07.191 (pentan-2,4-dion) in 09.915 (propil 4-hidroksibenzoat), se črtata.
The following rows are inserted in the table:
V preglednico se vstavijo naslednje vrstice:
FL No
Št. FL
Chemical group
Kemijska skupina
2-Octene
2-okten
Hexadecane
heksadekan
Methylacetophenone
metilacetofenon
CAS No corresponds to 2-methylacetophenone
Št. CAS ustreza 2- metilacetofenonu
4-Octene
4-okten
Octadecane
oktadekan
3-Methyl-1-nitrobutane
3-metil-1-nitrobutan
Heptadecane
heptadekan
Methyl-2-methyl-3-mercaptopropionate
metil-2-metil-3-merkaptopropionat
Methanedithiol
metaneditiol
3,7-Decadiene
3,7-dekadien
4,4-Dimethyl-1,3-oxathiane
4,4-dimetil-1,3-oksatian
(Methylthio)methanethiol
(metiltio)metanetiol
6-Methyloctanal
6-metiloktanal
Indole acetic acid
indol ocetna kislina
4-Octen-2-one
4-okten-2-on
4-Octen-1-ol
4-okten-1-ol
4-Hydroxy-2-heptenoic acid lactone
4-hidroksi-2-heptenojska kislina lakton
2,6-Decadienal (c,c)
2,6-dekadienal (c,c)
2,6-Decadienal (t,t)
2,6-dekadienal (t,t)
3-Mercapto-3-methylbutanal
3-merkapto-3-metilbutanal
Dibutyl ether
dibutil eter
The table of part B is replaced by the following:
Preglednica iz dela B se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Flavouring substances notified in application of Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2232/96, for which the protection of the intellectual property rights of the manufacturer has been requested
Aromatične snovi, sporočene v skladu s členom 3(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 2232/96, za katere je bilo zahtevano varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine izdelovalca
Date of receipt of the notification by the Commission
Datum, ko je Komisija prejela uradno obvestilo
3-Methyl-2-butenylthiophene
3-metil-2-buteniltiofen
Rose thiophene
rožni tiofen (Rose thiophene)
amending for the fifth time Decision 2004/122/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in North Korea
o peti spremembi Odločbe 2004/122/ES o nekaterih ukrepih zaščite v zvezi z aviarno influenco v Severni Koreji
(notified under document number C(2005) 1451)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1451)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/496/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on animals entering the Community from third countries and amending Directives 89/662/EEC, 90/425/EEC and 90/675/EEC [1], and in particular Article 18(7) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/496/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o določitvi načel o organizaciji veterinarskih pregledov živali, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav, in o spremembi direktiv 89/662/EGS, 90/425/EGS ter 90/675/EGS [1], in zlasti člena 18(7) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2000/666/EC of 16 October 2000 laying down the animal health requirements and the veterinary certification for the import of birds, other than poultry and the conditions for quarantine [3] provides that Member States are to authorise the import of birds from third countries listed as members of the Office International des Epizooties (OIE) and that those birds are to be subjected to quarantine and testing upon entry into the Community.
Odločba Komisije 2000/666/ES z dne 16. oktobra 2000 o zahtevah za zdravstveno varstvo živali in izdajanju veterinarskih potrdil za uvoz ptic, razen perutnine, in pogojih za karanteno [3] določa, da morajo države članice dovoliti uvoz ptic iz tretjih držav, ki so navedene kot članice Mednarodnega urada za živalske kužne bolezni (OIE), in da se navedene ptice pri vstopu v Skupnost pošlje v karanteno ter zanje izvede pregled.
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea) has confirmed an outbreak of avian influenza on its territory.
Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja (Severna Koreja) je potrdila izbruh aviarne influence na svojem ozemlju.
North Korea is a member of the OIE and accordingly Member States are to accept imports of such birds from that country under Decision 2000/666/EC.
Severna Koreja je član OIE in zato morajo države članice v skladu z Odločbo 2000/666/ES sprejeti uvoze takih ptic iz navedene države.
Taking into account the potential serious consequences related to the specific avian influenza virus strain involved in the rest of Asia, the importation of those birds from North Korea should be suspended as a precautionary measure.
Zaradi možnih resnih posledic v zvezi s posebnim sevom virusa aviarne influence, ki se je pojavil drugod v Aziji, je treba kot previdnostni ukrep uvoz navedenih ptic iz Severne Koreje začasno ustaviti.
Under Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption [4], the importation of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers originating in North Korea is authorised.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1774/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2002 o določitvi zdravstvenih pravil za živalske stranske proizvode, ki niso namenjeni prehrani ljudi [4], je uvoz nepredelanega perja in delov perja s poreklom iz Severne Koreje dovoljen.
In view of the current disease situation in North Korea those imports should be suspended.
Glede na trenutno stanje bolezni v Severni Koreji je treba navedene uvoze začasno ustaviti.
Commission Decision 2004/122/EC of 6 February 2004 concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in several Asian countries [5] was adopted in response to outbreaks of avian influenza in several Asian countries.
Odločba Komisije 2004/122/ES z dne 6. februarja 2004 o nekaterih ukrepih zaščite v zvezi z aviarno influenco v več azijskih državah [5], je bila sprejeta kot odgovor na izbruhe aviarne influence v več azijskih državah.
Article 4 of that Decision provides that Member States are to suspend the importation from certain third countries of unprocessed feathers and parts of feathers and live birds other than poultry, as defined in Decision 2000/666/EC.
Člen 4 navedene Odločbe določa, da morajo države članice iz določenih držav začasno ustaviti uvoz nepredelanega perja in delov perja ter živih ptic, ki niso perutnina, kot je opredeljeno v Odločbi 2000/666/ES.
In the interests of animal and public health, North Korea should be added to the third countries referred to in Article 4 of Decision 2004/122/EC.
Zaradi zdravja živali in javnega zdravja je treba Severno Korejo dodati med tretje države iz člena 4 Odločbe 2004/122/ES.