natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Indeed, as the measure concerns the sale of firms having more than 1000 employees, there are grounds for supposing that the firms concerned will for the most part be large.
Poleg tega, da ukrep zadeva predajo podjetij, ki imajo več kot 1000 zaposlenih, obstajajo dejavniki, ki napeljujejo na domnevo, da bi zanimanje kazala predvsem velika podjetja.
The notified measure consequently cannot be considered compatible with the common market on the basis of the Employment Aid Regulation.
Po pregledu zgoraj navedenega, objavljen ukrep ne more biti upoštevan kot kompatibilen s skupnim tržiščem na osnovi Uredbe (ES) št. 2204/2002.
Assessment under the guidelines on national regional aid
Ocena na osnovi usmeritev glede državne pomoči v korist regij
The Commission also considered whether the scheme could be assessed under the guidelines on national regional aid [8].
Komisija je ocenila tudi možnost, da bi bil program pomoči pregledan na osnovi usmeritev glede državne pomoči v korist regij [8].
Provided certain stated requirements are met, these guidelines allow aid to maintain jobs to be authorised even if it falls within the definition of operating aid.
Na osnovi takih usmeritev, če so upoštevani določeni pogoji, je mogoče odobriti pomoč pri ohranjanju delovnih mest, ki pridejo v poštev pri opredelitvi finančne pomoči.
It is also possible to approve aid to investments in fixed capital undertaken in the form of the purchase of an establishment which has closed or which would have closed had it not been purchased.
Poleg tega je mogoče odobriti pomoč pri investicijah v osnovni kapital, ki so izvedena s pomočjo nakupa podjetja, ki je propadlo ali pa bi propadlo, če ga ne bi odkupili.
The scheme does not fall within the scope of the guidelines on national regional aid, however, because since it is applicable countrywide.
Vendar program pomoči ne pride v poštev na področju izvajanja usmeritev glede državne pomoči v korist regij, ker se ta izvaja znotraj državnega teritorija.
Moreover, the only case in which the scheme is known to have been applied is that of a company located in Verolanuova, Brescia, which is not in an area falling under the exemptions in Article 87(3)(a) or (c).
Poleg tega, edini znan primer, pri katerem je bila izveden program pomoči, vključuje eno podjetje, ki se nahaja v Verolanuovi (BS), na območju, ki ne koristi odstopanj po členu 87(3)(a) in (c) Pogodbe.
The notified measure consequently cannot be considered compatible with the common market on the basis of the guidelines on national regional aid.
Zato se objavljen ukrep ne upošteva kot kompatibilen s skupnim tržiščem na osnovi usmeritev glede državne pomoči v korist regij.
Lastly, the notified measure is incompatible with the common market in that it contains no provision on overlapping aid from different sources.
Objavljeni ukrep je kompatibilen s skupnim tržiščem, ker ne vsebuje nobenih odredb v zvezi s kopičenjem pomoči, ki prihaja iz različnih virov.
The Commission finds that the measure under examination constitutes State aid within the scope of Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Komisija ugotavlja, da obravnavani ukrep predstavlja državno pomoč po členu 87(1) Pogodbe.
Italy has put the measure into effect unlawfully, in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Italija je nezakonito izvedla sporno pomoč, ki krši člen 88(3) Pogodbe.
On the basis of the analysis set out above, the Commission finds that the aid is incompatible with the common market in the light of the rescue and restructuring guidelines, the Employment Aid Regulation and the guidelines on national regional aid.
Na osnovi zgoraj omenjene analize Komisija meni, da je pomoč nezdružljiva s skupnim tržiščem na osnovi usmeritev glede pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2204/2002 in z usmeritvami glede državne pomoči v korist regij.
This Decision concerns the aid scheme and the individual cases in which it is applied, and must be complied with immediately, with special reference to the recovery of all incompatible aid granted.
Ta odločba zadeva program pomoči in iz tega izhajajoče primere izvajanja in mora biti udejanjena takoj, s posebnim ozirom na povračilo posameznih nezdružljivih pomoči.
This Decision is without prejudice to the possibility that individual aid measures taken under the scheme may subsequently be considered compatible on their own merits, in whole or in part, by Commission decision,
Ta odločba dopušča možnost, da je posamezna pomoč, ki je dodeljena v okviru programa pomoči, po odločbi Komisije upoštevana kot v celoti ali delno združljiva na osnovi svoje specifične narave –
The State aid measure providing for urgent measures to assist employment which Italy has put into effect under Decree-law No 23 of 14 February 2003, converted into statute by Act No 81 of 17 April 2003, is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč, ki zadeva nujne odloke glede zaposlovanja, katere je Italija izvedla na osnovi Zakonskega dekreta št. 23 z dne 14. februarja 2003, spremenjenega v Zakon št. 81 dne 17. aprila 2003, je nezdružljiva s skupnim tržiščem.
Italy shall withdraw the scheme referred to in Article 1 in so far as it continues to have effect.
Italija razveljavlja program pomoči po členu 1, v koliko bo ta še veljaven.
Italy shall take all necessary measures to recover from the recipients the aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1 which has been unlawfully made available to the recipients.
Italija bo sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe za povračilo pomoči, odobrene koristnikom na osnovi programa pomoči po členu 1, ki jim je bila že dana na razpolago nezakonito.
Italy shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid with effect from the date of this Decision.
Italija bo razveljavila izplačilo vsake neplačane pomoči od datuma te odločbe.
Recovery shall be effectuated without delay in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the Decision.
Povračilo bo izvedeno brez odlašanja in v skladu s postopki internega prava, če le ti dopuščajo takojšnjo in dejansko izvedbo odločbe.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was made available to the recipient until the date of its recovery.
Pomoč, ki jo je potrebno vrniti, obsega obresti od datuma, ko je bila ta dana na razpolago koristniku do datuma dejanskega povračila.
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the reference rate used for calculating the grant equivalent of regional aid on the date on which the aid was made available to the recipient.
Obresti so izračunane na osnovi referenčne obrestne mere, ki se uporablja za izračun enakovredne subvencije v okviru pomoči v korist regij, na dan, ko je bila pomoč dana na razpolago koristniku.
The interest rate referred to in paragraph 5 shall apply on a compound basis over the entire period referred to in paragraph 4.
Obrestna mera po odstavku 5 je izračunana na sestavljeni osnovi za celotno obdobje po odstavku 4.
Italy shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it, using the questionnaire attached to the Decision.
V roku dveh mesecev od datuma objave te odločbe bo Italija obvestila Komisijo, s pomočjo vprašalnika, ki je priložen tej odločbi, o ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti pri usklajevanju z Odločbo.
This Decision is addressed to the Italian Republic.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Italijansko republiko.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2004.
V Bruslju, 30. marca 2004
OJ C 308, 18.12.2003, p. 5.
UL C 308, 18.12.2003 str. 5.
OJ C 288, 9.10.1999.
UL C 288, 9.10.1999.
OJ C 74, 10.3.1998.
UL C 74, 10.3.1998.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 102/87 France v Commission [1988] ECR 4067.
Odločitev sodišča z dne 13. julija 1988, primer 102/87 France v Commission [1988] ECR 4067.
As far as the sale of Ocean SpA to Brandt Italia is concerned, the Italian authorities did not supply any information regarding the size of the acquiring company, Brandt Italia.
Kar zadeva prodajo podjetja Ocean SpA podjetju Brandt Italia, italijanske oblasti niso posredovale nobenih informacij o velikosti podjetja Brandt Italia.
The company acquired, Ocean SpA, had more than 1000 employees.
Kupljeno podjetje Ocean SpA je imelo več kot 1000 uslužbencev.
Information regarding the implementation of the Commission Decision 2004/800/EC
Informacije, ki zadevajo izvedbo Odločbe Komisije 2004/800/ES
Total number of recipients and total amount of aid to be recovered
Celotno število koristnikov in celoten znesek pomoči, ki jo je treba vrniti
Please explain in detail how the amount of aid to be recovered from individual recipients will be calculated:
Podrobno navesti, kako bo izračunan znesek pomoči, ki jo bodo morali vrniti posamezni koristniki
principal,
kapital,
interest.
obresti.
What is the total amount of aid granted unlawfully under this scheme that is to be recovered (gross grant equivalents; prices of …)?
Koliko znaša celoten znesek nezakonite pomoči, ki jo je treba vrniti (bruto ekvivalent pomoči; cene za …), podeljen na osnovi programa pomoči.
What is the total number of recipients from whom aid granted unlawfully under this scheme is to be recovered?
Koliko znaša celotno število koristnikov, ki morajo vrniti pomoč, podeljeno nezakonito v okviru tega programa.
Measures planned or taken to recover the aid
Predvideni in že sprejeti ukrepi za povračilo pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures are planned and what measures have already been taken into effect an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, da navedete točno, kateri ukrepi so predvideni in kateri ukrepi so bili že sprejeti, da se prične z dejanskim povračilom pomoči.
Please indicate the legal basis of the measures.
Podrobno navesti pravno osnovo teh ukrepov.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Do katerega datuma bo zaključeno povračilo?
Information concerning individual recipients
Informacije v zvezi z posameznimi koristniki
On the table overleaf, please provide details of each of the recipients from whom aid granted unlawfully under the scheme is to be recovered.
Prosimo, da v priloženi tabeli navedete podatke v zvezi z vsakim posameznim koristnikom, ki mora vrniti pomoč, ki je bila podeljena nezakonito v okviru programa pomoči.
Name of recipient
Ime koristnika
Address of recipient
Naslov koristnika
Date [1]
Datum [1]
Amount of aid granted unlawfully [2] Currency: …
Znesek nezakonito dodeljene pomoči [2]valuta: ….
Recovery effected
Izvedeno povračilo
Date or dates on which the aid or part thereof was made available to the recipient.
Datum(-i), ko je bila pomoč (ali del pomoči) dana na razpolago koristniku.
Amount of aid made available to the recipient (in gross grant equivalent; at prices of …).
Znesek pomoči, ki je bila dana na razpolago koristniku (v obliki ekvivalentne bruto subvencije; cene za …).
The Commission invited other interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.
Komisija je povabila zainteresirane stranke, da predstavijo pripombe glede obravnavane pomoči.
No such comments were received.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb od tretjih zainteresiranih strank.
Given that the measure aimed to safeguard jobs, and involved the purchase of firms in difficulty, the Commission considered whether the aid might be held compatible under the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (the rescue and restructuring guidelines) [3], or under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment [4] (the Employment Aid Regulation), or, finally, under the guidelines on national regional aid [5]. The Commission expressed doubts as to the compatibility of the measure with the common market under any of these rules.
Glede na to, da je cilj ukrepa ohranjanje delovnih mest in dopuščanje nakupa podjetij v težavah, je Komisija pregledala njegovo združljivost na osnovi usmerjenosti Skupnosti glede državne pomoči pri prestrukturiranju podjetij v težavah (v nadaljevanju: „usmerjenost Skupnosti glede državne pomoči pri reševanju in prestrukturiranju“) [3], na osnovi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 v zvezi z izvajanjem členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES o državni pomoči v prid zaposlovanja [4] in, na koncu, na osnovi usmerjenosti glede državne pomoči v korist regij [5] Komisija je izrazila dvome glede združljivosti pomoči s skupnim tržiščem na osnovi vseh treh zgoraj navedenih normativov.
Council Decision 2004/803/CFSP
Sklep Sveta 2004/803/SZVP
of 25 November 2004
z dne 25. novembra 2004
on the launching of the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
o začetku vojaške operacije Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti člena 17 Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP of 12 July 2004 on the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina [1], and in particular Article 5 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2004/570/SZVP z dne 12. julija 2004 o vojaški operaciji Evropske unije v Bosni in Hercegovini [1], zlasti člena 5 Skupnega ukrepa,
On 9 July 2004 the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1551 (2004) welcoming the European Union's intention to launch an EU mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina, including a military component, from December 2004, under the terms set out in the letter of 29 June 2004 from the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ireland and President of the Council of the European Union to the Presidency of the Security Council.
Varnostni svet Organizacije združenih narodov je 9. julija 2004 soglasno sprejel resolucijo 1551 (2004), s katero je pozdravil namero Evropske unije, da decembra 2004 začne z misijo EU v Bosni in Hercegovini, ki bo vključevala vojaško komponento, pod pogoji iz pisma ministra za zunanje zadeve Irske in predsednika Sveta Evropske Unije Predsedstvu Varnostnega sveta z dne 29. junija 2004.
The United Nations Security Council further decided that the status of forces agreements currently contained in Appendix B to Annex 1.A of the Peace Agreement shall apply provisionally in respect to the proposed EU mission and its forces, including from the point of their build-up in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in anticipation of the concurrence of the parties to those agreements to that effect.
Poleg tega je Varnostni svet Organizacije združenih narodov odločil, da se sporazumi o statusu sil iz Dodatka B Priloge 1.A mirovnega sporazuma, začasno uporabljajo za predlagano misijo EU in njene sile, vključno od trenutka začetka njihove razmestitve v Bosni in Hercegovini ter pričakuje, da se bodo podpisnice teh sporazumov s tem strinjale.
On 22 November 2004 the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1575 (2004), inter alia authorising the Member States, acting through or in cooperation with the EU, to establish for an initial planned period of 12 months a multinational stabilisation force (EUFOR) as a legal successor to SFOR under unified command and control, which will fulfil its missions in relation to the implementation of Annex 1-A and Annex 2 of the Peace Agreement in cooperation with the NATO HQ presence in accordance with the arrangements agreed between NATO and the EU as communicated to the Security Council, which recognise that EUFOR will have the main peace stabilisation role under the military aspects of the Peace Agreement, and recognising that the Peace Agreement and the provisions of its previous relevant resolutions shall apply to and in respect of both EUFOR and the NATO presence as they have applied to and in respect of SFOR and that therefore references in the Peace Agreement, in particular in Annex 1-A and its appendices, and relevant resolutions to IFOR and/or SFOR, NATO and the NAC shall henceforth be read as applying, as appropriate, to the NATO presence, EUFOR, the European Union and the Political and Security Committee and Council of the European Union respectively.
Varnostni svet Organizacije združenih narodov je 22. novembra 2004 soglasno sprejel Resolucijo 1575 (2004), s katero je države članice med drugim pooblastil, da s posredovanjem EU ali v sodelovanju z EU vzpostavijo večnacionalne stabilizacijske sile (EUFOR), za začetno načrtovano obdobje 12 mesecev; te sile bodo pravni naslednik SFOR in bodo pod enotnim poveljstvom ter nadzorom opravljale svoje naloge v zvezi z izvajanjem Priloge 1-A in Priloge 2 Mirovnega sporazuma ter v sodelovanju z prisotnim NATO HQ v skladu z dogovorom med NATO in EU, o katerem je bil Varnostni svet obveščen in v katerih je v skladu z Mirovnim sporazumom EUFOR priznana glavna vloga za stabilizacijo miru; prav tako je potrdil, da se Mirovni sporazum in določbe predhodnih ustreznih resolucij glede prisotnosti EUFOR in NATO uporabljajo na isti način ter v istem oziru, kot so se uporabljale za SFOR, ter se zaradi tega sklicevanja na mirovni sporazum, zlasti na Prilogo 1-A in njene dodatke, ter ustrezne resolucije, ki se nanašajo na IFOR in/ali SFOR, NATO ter NAC, smiselno uporabljajo tudi za prisotnost NATO, EUFOR, Evropsko unijo, Politični in varnostni odbor ter Svet Evropske unije.
In conformity with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications.
V skladu s členom 6 Protokola o stališču Danske, priloženem Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri pripravi in izajanju odločitev in ukrepov Evropske unije, ki zadevajo obrambo.
Denmark does not participate in the financing of the operation.
Danska ne sodeluje pri financiranju operacije.
On 12 and 13 December 2002 the Copenhagen European Council adopted a Declaration stating that the ‘Berlin plus’ arrangements and the implementation thereof will apply only to those EU Member States which are also either NATO members or parties to the ‘Partnership for Peace’, and which have consequently concluded bilateral security agreements with NATO,
Evropski svet v Kopenhagnu z dne 12. in 13. decembra 2002 je sprejel izjavo, ki poudarja, da se bo ureditev „Berlin plus“ in njena izvedba uporabljala le za tiste države članice EU, ki so hkrati tudi članice NATA, ali pogodbenice „Partnerstva za mir“ in so torej z NATOM sklenile dvostranske varnostne sporazume.
The EU military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, ALTHEA, shall be launched on 2 December 2004.
Vojaška operacija EU v Bosni in Hercegovini, ALTHEA, se začne 2. decembra 2004.
The EU Operation Commander is hereby authorised with immediate effect to release the activation order (ACTORD) in order to execute the deployment of the forces, prior to Transfer of Authority following their arrival in theatre, and start execution of the mission on 2 December 2004.
Poveljnik operacije EU se pooblasti s takojšnim učinkom za izdajo akcijskega ukaza (ACTORD) z namenom razmestitve sil še pred prenosom odgovornosti po njihovem prihodu na kraj operacij in za začetek izvajanja misije 2. decembra 2004.
Without prejudice to Article 17 of Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP, this Decision shall remain in force until the Council decides to end the EU military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Brez poseganja v člen 17 Skupnega ukrepa 2004/570/SZVP ta sklep ostane v veljavi dokler Svet ne sklene končati vojaške operacije EU v Bosni in Hercegovini.
Done at Brussels, 25 November 2004.
V Bruslju, 25. novembra 2004
terminating the examination procedure concerning obstacles to trade consisting of trade practices maintained by Canada in relation to certain geographical indications for wines
o zaključku postopka preverjanja glede trgovinskih ovir na podlagi trgovinske prakse Kanade v odnosu do nekaterih geografskih označb za vina
(notified under document number C(2004) 4388)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 4388)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community’s rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation [1], and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o določitvi postopkov Skupnosti na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Skupnosti po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije [1], in zlasti člena 11(1) Uredbe,
On 6 December 2001, the Conseil interprofessionnel du vin de Bordeaux (CIVB) lodged a complaint pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 (hereinafter ‘the Regulation’).
Dne 6. decembra 2001 je Conseil Interprofessionnel du vin de Bordeaux (CIVB) (CIVB) vložil pritožbo na podlagi člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 3286/94 (v nadaljevanju „Uredba“).
CIVB claimed that Community sales of Bordeaux and Médoc in Canada are hindered by a number of obstacles to trade within the meaning of Article 2(1) of the Regulation, i.e. ‘a practice adopted or maintained by a third country and in respect of which international trade rules establish a right of action’.
CIVB je trdil, da prodajo Bordeaux in Médoc Skupnosti v Kanadi omejuje vrsta trgovinskih ovir v smislu člena 2(1) Uredbe, tj. „praksa, ki jo sprejme ali ohranja tretja država, proti kateri mednarodna pravila trgovanja priznavajo pravico do ukrepanja“.
The alleged obstacle to trade resulted from the C-57 Amendment to the Canadian Trademarks Act, which deprived the geographical indications Bordeaux and Médoc of a standard protection in compliance with the protection requirements laid down by the WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) for geographical indications for wines.
Domnevna trgovinska ovira je posledica spremembe C-57 h kanadskemu zakonu o blagovnih znamkah, ki je geografskima označbama Bordeaux in Médoc odvzela standardno zaščito v skladu z zahtevami za zaščito, ki jih za geografske označbe za vina določa Sporazum STO o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIP).
The Commission decided that the complaint contained sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of an examination procedure.
Komisija je odločila, da je pritožba vsebovala dovolj dokazov za utemeljitev začetka postopka preverjanja.
A corresponding notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [2].
Ustrezno obvestilo je bilo objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnost [2].
The investigation confirmed the complainant’s legal claim that the C-57 Amendment to the Canadian Trademarks Act violated Article 23.1 and 2 as well as Article 24.3 (the standstill clause) of TRIPS and that such infringements could not be justified on the basis of the exception under Article 24.6 of TRIPS.
Preiskava je potrdila pravno upravičen zahtevek pritožnika, da je sprememba C-57 kanadskega zakona o blagovnih znamkah kršila člen 23.1 in 2 kakor tudi člen 24.3 (tako imenovana klavzula o mirovanju) TRIP, ter da takih kršitev ni bilo mogoče opravičiti na podlagi izjeme v skladu s členom 24.6 TRIP.
The examination procedure also concluded that the C-57 Amendment threatens to cause adverse trade effects to the complainant, within the meaning of Article 2(4) and 10(4) of the Regulation.
V postopku preverjanja je bilo tudi ugotovljeno, da obstaja nevarnost, da bo imela sprememba C-57 za pritožnika škodljive učinke na trgovino v smislu členov 2(4) in 10(4) Uredbe.
On 12 February 2003, the Advisory Committee established by the Regulation considered the final report on the examination procedure.
Dne 12. februarja 2003 je svetovalni odbor, ustanovljen z Uredbo, preučil končno poročilo postopka preverjanja.