natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The islands of Ischia and Procida are connected to the mainland ports of Naples and Pozzuoli by various scheduled mixed and high-speed transport services.
Otoka Ischia in Procida sta povezana s celinskima pristaniščema Neapelj in Pozzuoli z različnimi rednimi kombiniranimi in hitrimi prevoznimi storitvami.
Only Caremar operates the Ischia/Procida/mainland (Naples or Pozzuoli) connection.
Samo družba Caremar deluje na povezavi Ischia–Procida–celina (Neapelj ali Pozzuoli).
The direct Ischia/Naples and Procida/Naples connections, on the other hand, are operated with high-speed craft by Caremar and various private Italian operators.
Neposredni povezavi Ischia–Neapelj in Procida–Neapelj na drugi strani delujeta z hitro ladjo družbe Caremar in različnimi zasebnimi prevozniki.
The information supplied by the Italian authorities shows that on these two direct connections — Ischia/Naples and Procida/Naples — the private operators provide services comparable, overall, with those provided by Caremar.
Informacije, ki jih posredujejo italijanski organi, kažejo, da v teh dveh neposrednih povezavah – Ischia–Neapelj in Procida–Neapelj – zasebni prevozniki zagotavljajo primerljive storitve, v celoti, s tistimi, ki jih zagotavlja družba Caremar.
The Commission notes, however, that on the Procida/Naples connection Caremar provides the first daily departure from the island of Procida all year round and the last daily departure from the mainland during the off-season, thus enabling the island’s residents to travel for professional or study reasons.
Komisija pa ugotavlja, da na povezavi Procida–Neapelj družba Caremar zagotavlja prvo odplutje v dnevu iz otoka Procida celo leto in zadnje odplutje v dnevu s celine v času izven sezone, in tako omogoča rezidentom otoka, da potujejo iz poklicnih ali študijskih razlogov.
The Commission also notes that the operating loss of these services has been examined for the purpose of calculating the annual balancing subsidy paid to Caremar.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da so izgube delovanja preverjene za namen izračuna letne uravnalne subvencije, plačane družbi Caremar.
In addition, in the light of a complaint sent on 13 August 1999 (registered by DG Transport on 18 August 1999 under the number D 02.308 64296), the Commission has reason to believe that, for the year 1990 at least, the private operators which provided high-speed connection services on a number of routes in the Gulf of Naples, including Naples/Capri, Naples/Ischia, Naples/Sorrento/Capri and Naples/Procida/Ischia, received subsidies from the Campania Region.
Poleg tega v luči pritožbe, poslane 13. avgusta 1999 (registrirana z DG Transportom dne 18. avgusta 1999 pod številko D 02.308 64296), Komisija utemeljeno domneva, da so najmanj za leto 1990 zasebni prevozniki, ki so zagotavljali hitre povezovalne storitve na številnih poteh v Neapeljskem zalivu, vključno s potmi Neapelj–Capri, Neapelj–Ischia, Neapelj–Sorrento–Capri in Neapelj–Procida–Ischia, prejeli subvencije za območje Kampanije.
These data tend to confirm the need for subsidies to ensure a satisfactory level of public service.
Ti podatki navadno potrjujejo potrebo po subvencijah za zagotavljanje zadovoljive ravni javnih storitev.
On the direct Ponza/Formia and Ventotene/Formia routes, Caremar competes with a private operator in the high-speed segment.
Na neposrednih poteh Ponza–Formia in Ventotene–Formia družba Caremar konkurira z zasebnim prevoznikom v hitrem segmentu.
The information supplied by the Italian authorities shows that only Caremar operates every day of the week on the Ventotene/Formia route in accordance with the service regularity requirements stipulated in the agreement.
Informacije, ki so jih posredovali italijanski organi, kažejo, da samo družba Caremar deluje vsak dan v tednu na poti Ventotene–Formia v skladu z zahtevami po pravilnosti storitev, določenimi v sporazumu.
In addition, the high-speed service Caremar provides on the Ponza/Formia route solely on Mondays complements the service provided by the private operator on the other days of the week.
Poleg tega storitev hitre povezave, ki jo družba Caremar zagotavlja na poti Ponza–Formia, samo ob ponedeljkih dopolnjuje storitev, ki jo zagotavlja zasebni prevoznik na druge dni v tednu.
Need for compensation
Potreba po nadomestilu
With regard to the services the regional companies provide on routes where there is no competition, the Commission notes that these cover both passenger and freight transport and that the lack of competition applies to the various five-year periods covered by the public service agreements.
Ob upoštevanju storitev, ki jih regionalne družbe zagotavljajo na poteh, kjer ni konkurence, Komisija ugotavlja, da te pokrivajo tako potniški kot tovorni promet in da pomanjkanje konkurence velja za različna petletna obdobja, ki jih pokrivajo sporazumi javnih storitev.
The lack of competition on these routes over the last decade shows that companies operating according to market rules would be unable to guarantee the transport services which the regional companies are providing in accordance with the agreements.
Pomanjkanje konkurence na teh poteh v zadnjem desetletju kaže, da družbe, ki delujejo v skladu s tržnimi pravili, ne bi mogle zagotoviti prevoznih storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo regionalne družbe v skladu s sporazumi.
Compensation is therefore necessary to allow these companies to offset the extra costs they incur in supplying these services.
Nadomestilo je torej nujno, da se omogoči družbam, da pokrijejo posebne stroške, ki nastanejo pri zagotavljanju teh storitev.
With regard to the services the regional companies provide on the routes examined above on which they do face competition, the Commission notes that in most cases the free play of market forces would not serve to produce the transport services the regional companies provide under the agreements.
Glede na storitve, ki jih regionalne družbe zagotavljajo na zgoraj preverjenih poteh, na katerih se soočajo s konkurenco, Komisija ugotavlja, da v večini primerov svobodno delovanje tržnih sil ne bi služilo proizvajanju prevoznih storitev, ki jih regionalne družbe zagotavljajo na podlagi sporazumov.
Here, too, compensation is necessary to allow the companies to offset the extra costs they incur in supplying these services.
Tudi tu je nadomestilo nujno, da se omogoči družbam, da pokrijejo posebne stroške, ki nastanejo pri zagotavljanju teh storitev.
In a few rare cases, comparable competition attests to the market’s capacity to satisfy the service requirements stipulated in the public service agreements.
V nekaj redkih primerih primerljiva konkurenca potrjuje zmogljivost trga, da zadovolji potrebe po storitvah, določene v sporazumih o javnih storitvah.
The presence of any private operators capable, without financial compensation, of satisfying the obligations imposed on the public operator in terms of regularity of service, frequency and type of ship would cast doubt on the need for and proportionality of the compensation paid to the public operator to operate the routes in question.
Prisotnost katerega koli zasebnega prevoznika, ki je brez finančnih nadomestil sposoben zadovoljevati obveznosti, naložene javnemu prevozniku kar zadeva pravilnost storitve, pogostost in vrsto ladje, bi povzročilo dvom o potrebi po sorazmernosti nadomestila, plačanega javnemu prevozniku, da deluje na zadevnih poteh.
The problem arises in particular in respect of the Naples/Capri and Naples/Ischia high-speed connections Caremar operates in the Gulf of Naples.
Problem nastane zlasti kar zadeva hitrih povezav Neapelj–Capri in Neapelj–Ischia, ki jih družba Caremar upravlja v Neapeljskem zalivu.
In this respect, information sent to the Commission by a number of complainants shows that in March 2002, at the initiative of the Campania Region, the private operators, long present in the Gulf of Naples market, undertook with the regional authorities to provide a year-round service similar to that provided by Caremar, notably on the two routes referred to above, renouncing in advance any financial compensation.
S tem v zvezi informacije, ki so jih Komisiji poslali številni vlagatelji pritožbe kažejo, da so se marca 2002, na pobudo območja Kampanija, zasebni prevozniki, ki so dolgo prisotni na trgu Neapeljskega zaliva, zavezali z regionalnimi organi, da zagotovijo celoletno storitev, podobno tisti, ki jo zagotavlja družba Caremar, predvsem na dveh zgoraj navedenih poteh in se v naprej odpovedujejo kakršnemu koli finančnemu nadomestilu.
The Commission notes, however, that these services are not equivalent to those provided by the public operator in terms of regularity, frequency of connections and type of ship, and that the private operators are entitled to withdraw from their obligations subject to 45 days’ notice.
Komisija pa ugotavlja, da te storitve niso enakovredne tistim, ki jih zagotavlja javni prevoznik kar zadeva pravilnost, pogostost povezav in vrsto ladje in da so zasebni prevozniki upravičeni do umika od svojih obveznosti, če zagotovijo 45 dni po dnevu sporočila.
It should also be noted that a number of obligations are imposed solely on the public operator (e.g. keeping a ship berthed on the island overnight and operating the first and last journeys of the day) and generate additional costs which need to enter into the calculation of the compensation.
Treba je tudi ugotoviti, da so številne obveznosti naložene samo javnemu prevozniku (npr. zasidranje ladje na otoku preko noči in delovanje na prvih in zadnjih plovbah dneva) in ustvarjajo dodatne stroške, ki jih je potrebno vključiti v izračunavanje nadomestila.
Moreover, there is a complementarity between the services provided by Caremar and those supplied by the private operators.
Poleg tega obstaja komplementarnost med storitvami, ki jih zagotavlja družba Caremar in tistimi, ki jih zagotavljajo zasebni prevozniki.
In view of these considerations, the need for and proportionality of the compensation cannot be doubted.
Glede na te preudarke ni mogoče dvomiti o potrebi po sorazmernosti nadomestila.
To establish whether the annual compensation paid to the regional companies is the minimum needed to provide services which meet the public service requirements laid down by the Italian authorities, the Commission needs to examine all the parameters which cause the public operator to incur additional costs in providing the services.
Da se ugotovi, ali je letno nadomestilo, plačano regionalnim družbam, najnižji potreben znesek za zagotavljanje storitev, ki izpolnjujejo zahteve javnih storitev, določenih s strani italijanskih organov, mora Komisija preveriti vse parametre, ki povzročajo, da javni prevoznik poravna dodatne stroške pri zagotavljanju storitev.
The Commission notes that the compensation calculation mechanism provides for profits made during the high season to help reduce the losses accumulated during the off-season, so that the resulting level of annual compensation is lower overall than it would be if the accumulated losses were simply added together route by route.
Komisija ugotavlja, da mehanizem izračunavanja nadomestila zagotavlja, da dobički, ki nastanejo med visoko sezono pomagajo zmanjšati izgube, ki se naberejo v času izven sezone, tako da je končna raven letnega nadomestila skupno nižja kot bi bila, če se nakopičene izgube preprosto seštejejo pot za potjo.
The Commission also notes that the company’s revenue is subject to a dual constraint in terms of fares, namely the preferential fares for certain social categories and the need for the company to obtain the public authorities’ approval for any change in fares.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je prihodek družbe predmet dvojne omejitve kar zadeva prevoznine, in sicer, preferencialne prevoznine za določene socialne kategorije in potrebe, da družba pridobi potrditev javnih organov za kakršne koli spremembe prevoznin.
The information supplied by the Italian authorities shows that the regional companies are not free to adapt their fares to take account, in particular, of changes in operating costs.
Informacije, ki so jih posredovali italijanski organi kažejo, da regionalne družbe ne morejo svobodno prilagajati svojih prevoznin, da upoštevajo zlasti spremembe stroškov delovanja.
This twin constraint, which leads to an appreciable reduction in the concessionary companies’ income and affects the level of annual compensation, cannot be described under such circumstances as an aggressive commercial policy, characterised by predatory pricing.
Te dvojne omejitve, ki vodita do bistvenega znižanja prihodka koncesijskih družb in vplivata na raven letnega nadomestila, ni mogoče opisati v takšnih okoliščinah kot agresivno trgovinsko politiko, za katero je značilno grabežljivo oblikovanje cen.
Secondly, the Commission notes that the cost elements taken into consideration in order to calculate the compensation have been defined by the public authorities, leaving the companies with no margin of discretion.
Drugič, Komisija ugotavlja, da so bili stroškovni elementi, ki se upoštevajo pri izračunavanju nadomestil, določeni s strani javnih organov, ki puščajo družbe brez meje za presojo.
These elements reflect all the fixed and variable costs directly linked to providing the services classified by the public authorities as services of general interest and which, as such, are covered by the agreements.
Ti elementi odražajo vse fiksne in variabilne stroške, ki so neposredno povezani, da zagotavljajo storitve, ki jih javni organi razvrstijo kot storitve splošnega interesa in ki so, kot take, krite s sporazumi.
The tables below — which use 2000 as the reference year — give a breakdown of each regional company’s costs taken into consideration for the purpose of calculating the annual compensation.
Tabele spodaj – kjer se kot referenčno leto uporablja leto 2000 – kažejo motnje stroškov vsake regionalne družbe, ki se upoštevajo v namen izračunavanja letnega nadomestila.
The cost elements, as determined by the public authorities and annexed to the public service agreements, are the same for all the regional companies and have not altered since 1991.
Stroškovni elementi, kot jih določajo javni organi in so priloženi sporazumom o javnih storitvah, so enaki za vse regionalne družbe in se niso spremenili od leta 1991.
COST ELEMENTS 2000 economic accounts
STROŠKOVNI ELEMENTI ekonomski računi leta 2000
Agency commission/acquisition costs
provizija agencije/nabavni stroški
Port taxes/port transit costs and other traffic costs
Pristaniške dajatve/tranzitni stroški pristanišča in drugi prometni stroški
Operating costs
Stroški delovanja
Net financial charges
Neto finančne dajatve
Administration
Upravljanje
Other costs
Drugi stroški
102881,1– costs
102881,1– gi stroški
Operating revenue
prihodki
Result (costs — revenue)
Rezultat (stroški – prihodki)
Return on capital invested
Donosnost naloženega kapitala
Compensation under Article 7
Nadomestilo iz člena 7
Annual subsidy
LETNA SUBVENCIJA
The operating costs include the cost of the crew, maintenance, insurance, fuel and mineral oils.
Stroški delovanja vključujejo stroške posadke, vzdrževanja, zavarovanja, goriva in mineralnih olj.
The ‘administration’ item essentially includes the cost of shore personnel and administrative premises.
Postavka „upravljanje“ predvsem vključuje stroške osebja na kopnem in stroške administrativnih prostorov.
The Commission notes that the cost elements used to calculate the annual compensation can all be connected to and are necessary for the operation of the routes served by the regional companies pursuant to the agreements.
Komisija ugotavlja, da se lahko vsi stroškovni elementi, ki se uporabljajo za izračunavanje letnega nadomestila, povezujejo z in so potrebni za delovanje poti, ki jih oskrbujejo regionalne družbe v skladu s sporazumi.
Regarding ship depreciation, the Commission considers that, to the extent that the ships in question are used exclusively for the services covered by the agreements, this cost element may be regarded as necessary for the provision of those services and may thus legitimately enter into the calculation of the annual compensation.
Kar zadeva amortizacijo ladij Komisija meni, da v kolikor se zadevne ladje uporabljajo izrecno za storitve, ki jih pokrivajo sporazumi, se lahko ta stroškovni element obravnava kot nujen za delovanje tistih storitev in se ga lahko tako zakonito vključi v izračunavanje letnega nadomestila.
Regarding the cost of fuels and mineral oils used by these ships, the Commission has found no discriminatory element reducing the cost of such fuels and lubricants to the benefit of the regional companies vis-à-vis other maritime transport operators.
Kar zadeva stroške goriv in mineralnih olj, ki jih te ladje uporabljajo, Komisija ni našla nobenega diskriminatornega elementa, ki zmanjšuje stroške takšnih goriv in mazalnih sredstev, ki bi koristil regionalnim družbam nasproti drugim prevoznikom pomorskega prometa.
To enable the Commission to establish that the compensation has been proportional, the Italian authorities supplied it with an analysis of the operating accounts for each of the routes served by the regional companies over the last 10 years.
Da bi Komisiji zagotovili, da ugotovi, ali je nadomestilo sorazmerno, so ji italijanski organi posredovali analizo računov delovanja za vsako izmed poti, na kateri delujejo regionalne družbe zadnjih 10 let.
In this regard, the Commission would note, firstly, that the level of annual compensation is calculated taking account of the operating profits recorded by each of the regional companies on the routes covered by the public service agreements, which are deducted from the losses accumulated on the routes as a whole.
V tem pogledu bi Komisija najprej ugotovila, da se letna raven nadomestila izračunava z upoštevanjem dobičkov delovanja, ki so jih zabeležile regionalne družbe na poteh, ki jih pokrivajo sporazumi o javnih storitvah, ki se odštejejo od izgub, ki so se nabrale na poteh v celoti.
This method of calculation serves to limit the amount of subsidy paid to the public companies.
Ta metoda izračunavanja služi omejitvi zneska subvencije, plačane javnim družbam.
The Commission generally considers that only costs directly linked to charges resulting from the public service obligations laid down by the Italian authorities may be taken into consideration when calculating the annual compensation.
Komisija na splošno meni, da se lahko pri izračunavanju letnega nadomestila upoštevajo samo stroški, ki so neposredno povezani s stroški, ki izhajajo iz obveznosti javnih storitev, določenih s strani italijanskih organov.
In this respect, it notes that the regional companies only provide the scheduled services specified in the various five-year plans in terms of regularity, frequency and capacity.
S tem v zvezi ugotavlja, da regionalne družbe zagotavljajo samo redne storitve, določene v različnih petletnih načrtih kar zadeva pravilnost, pogostost in zmogljivost.
For services which the regional companies have been shown to have provided in the face of comparable competition, it needs to be checked whether a negative net operating result has been recorded and taken into account in the calculation of the annual compensation paid to the company concerned.
Za storitve, za katere se je pokazalo, da so jih regionalne družbe odkrito zagotavljale pred primerljivo konkurenco, je potrebno preveriti, če so bili negativni neto rezultati delovanja evidentirani in upoštevani pri izračunavanju letnega nadomestila, plačanega zadevni družbi.
As regards Adriatica, comparable competition from another Community operator can be observed on the Bari/Durrës (Albania) route.
Kar zadeva družbo Adriatica, se lahko primerljiva konkurenca drugega prevoznika Skupnosti opazuje na poti Bari–Drač (Albanija).
However, examination has shown that the company’s operating results on this route are positive, with the result that it has received no subsidy for the services it has provided.
Vendar pa je revizija pokazala, da so stroški delovanja družbe na tej poti pozitivni s tem, da ni prejela subvencije za zagotovljene storitve.
On the Brindisi/Corfu/Igoumenitsa/Patras route, Adriatica faced comparable competition, overall, from other Community operators until 2000, the year in which it stopped operating the connection.
Na poti Brindisi–Krf–Igoumenitsa–Patras se je družba Adriatica soočila s primerljivo konkurenco, v celoti, od drugih prevoznikov Skupnosti do leta 2000, leta, v katerem je prekinila z delovanjem na povezavi.
Examination of the operating results shows that the net loss recorded on this route was taken into consideration when calculating the annual compensation.
Pregled rezultatov delovanja kaže, da se je neto izguba, zabeležena na tej poti, upoštevala pri izračunavanju letnega nadomestila.
With reference to the need for compensation, the Commission has noted (recital 101) that this is a vital route for the development of the Community’s outlying regions in accordance with the Community guidelines of 1997.
V zvezi s potrebo po nadomestilu je Komisija ugotovila (uvodna izjava 101), da je ta pot izredno pomembna za razvoj odročnih regij Skupnosti v skladu s Smernicami Skupnosti iz leta 1997.
However, the Commission has already indicated that compensation is not necessary for the period from January 1992 to July 1994, during which Adriatica took part in a prohibited pact.
Vendar pa je Komisija že navedla, da nadomestilo ni potrebno za obdobje od januarja 1992 do julija 1994, v katerem je družba Adriatica sodelovala v prepovedanem paktu.
Regarding Siremar, the Commission has already observed (recital 105) that none of the private Italian operators on the local markets served by the public operator provides comparable services all year round capable of meeting all the public service requirements stipulated in the five-year plans.
Kar zadeva družbo Siremar je Komisija že upoštevala (uvodna izjava 105), da noben izmed zasebnih italijanskih prevoznikov na lokalnih trgih, kjer deluje javni prevoznik, ne zagotavlja primerljivih storitev celo leto, ki bi lahko izpolnjevali vse zahteve javnih storitev, ki so določene v petletnih načrtih.
For Saremar, the Commission has found (recital 112) that on the Santa Teresa/Bonifacio route the private competitor does not satisfy the requirements of regularity and continuity of service throughout the year as prescribed by the Italian authorities.
Za družbo Saremar je Komisija ugotovila (uvodna izjava 112), da na poti Santa Teresa–Bonifacio zasebni konkurent ne zadovoljuje zahtev pravilnosti in kontinuitete storitve celo leto, kot predpisujejo italijanski organi.
Moreover, on the two cabotage connections on which there is competition from private Italian operators, the Commission has observed (recital 113) that the ships of Saremar’s private competitors fail to satisfy the Italian authorities’ requirements in terms of maximum age.
Poleg tega na dveh kabotažnih povezavah, na katerih je konkurenca zasebnih italijanskih prevoznikov, je Komisija ugotovila (uvodna izjava 113), da ladje zasebnih konkurentov družbe Saremar ne izpolnjujejo zahtev italijanskih organov kar zadeva najvišjo starost.
For Toremar, the Commission has noted (recitals 114 to 116) that the private operator which competes with the company on the route between Tuscany and the island of Elba fails to satisfy the Italian authorities’ requirements in terms of the age of the ships.
Za družbo Toremar je Komisija ugotovila (uvodne izjave 114–116), da zasebni prevoznik, ki konkurira z družbo na poti med Tuscanyjem in otokom Elbo, ne izpolnjuje zahtev italijanskih organov kar zadeva starost ladij.
For Caremar, the comparable competition from private Italian operators focuses on the Capri/Naples, Procida/Naples and Ischia/Naples connections, where it is confined to the high-speed passenger transport segment.
Za družbo Caremar se primerljiva konkurenca zasebnih italijanskih prevoznikov osredotoča na povezave Capri–Neapelj, Procida–Neapelj in Ischia–Neapelj, kjer je omejena na segment hitrega potniškega prometa.