natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(notified under document number C(2003) 4570 final and corrigendum C(2004) 4)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2003) 4570 konč. in popravek K(2004) 4)
(Only the English, German and Spanish texts are authentic)
(Besedila v angleškem, nemškem in španskem jeziku so edina verodostojna)
On 10 December 2003, the Commission adopted a decision (C(2003) 4570 final) relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.
decembra 2003 je Komisija sprejela odločbo (K(2003) 4570 konč.) v zvezi s postopkom iz člena 81 Pogodbe ES in iz člena 53 Sporazuma EGP.
On 7 January 2004, the Commission approved by written procedure E/2/2004 (C(2004) 4) a corrigendum to the German and Spanish versions of Decision C(2003) 4570 final.
januarja 2004 je Komisija s pisnim postopkom E/2/2004 (K(2004) 4) odobrila popravek nemške in španske različice Odločbe K(2003) 4570 konč.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Regulation 17 [1], the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business interests.
Komisija v skladu z določbami člena 21 Uredbe št. 17 [1] objavlja imena udeleženih strani in vsebino odločbe, ob upoštevanju upravičenega zanimanja za podjetja pri zaščiti poslovnih koristi.
A non-confidential version of the full text of the decision can be found in the authentic languages of the case and in the Commission’s working languages at DG COMP’s website at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html
Nezaupna različica celotnega besedila odločbe se lahko v izvirnih jezikih in v delovnih jezikih Komisije najde na spletni strani GD COMP http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html
I. SUMMARY OF THE INFRINGEMENT
I. POVZETEK KRŠITVE
Addresses and nature of the infringement
Naslovniki in narava kršitve
This Decision is addressed to the following undertakings and/or associations of undertakings:
Ta odločba je naslovljena na naslednja podjetja in/ali podjetniška združenja:
Beginning from 1971, the main producers of organic peroxides at that time (Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV and Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV, Luperox GmbH (which became part of the main German subsidiary of Atofina SA) hereinafter Akzo and Peroxid-Chemie GmbH & Co KG) entered into and participated in a continuing agreement contrary to Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement covering at times all and at times most of the Community and the EEA, by which they agreed on market shares, fixed the prices of the product, agreed on and implemented a mechanism for price increases, allocated customers and set up a machinery to monitor and enforce their agreements.
Že od leta 1971 so takrat najpomembnejši proizvajalci organskih peroksidov (Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV, Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV in Luperox GmbH (ki je postal del najpomembnejšega nemškega hčerinskega podjetja Atofina SA), v nadaljevanju Akzo in Peroxid Chemie GmbH & Co. KG) sklenili stalni sporazum in tudi sodelovali pri tem stalnem sporazumu, ki je bil v nasprotju s členom 81(1) Pogodbe in s členom 53(1) Sporazuma EGP ter je občasno obsegal celotno ozemlje in občasno večino ozemlja Skupnosti in EGP, in s katerim so se sporazumeli o tržnih deležih, določili cene proizvodov, se sporazumeli in izvedli mehanizem za zviševanje cen, opredelili stranke in vzpostavili naprave za spremljanje in uveljavitev teh sporazumov.
Peroxidos Organicos S.A. (1975 to 1999) took part in a specific arrangement within the overall agreement.
Podjetje Peroxidos Organicos SA (1975–1999) je sodelovalo pri posebnem dogovoru v sklopu splošnega sporazuma.
AC Treuhand AG (1993 to 1999) was involved as well.
Sodelovalo je tudi podjetje AC Treuhand AG (1993–1999).
Duration of the infringement
Trajanje kršitve
Duration of the participation
Trajanje sodelovanja:
Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV, Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV and Akzo Nobel N.V. from 1 January 1971 to 31 December 1999;
Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV, Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV in Akzo Nobel NV od 1. januarja 1971 do 31. decembra 1999;
Atofina SA from 1 January 1971 to 31 December 1999;
Atofina SA od 1. januarja 1971 do 31. decembra 1999;
Peroxid-Chemie GmbH & Co. KG from 1 January 1971 to 31 December 1999;
Peroxid Chemie GmbH & Co. KG od 1. januarja 1971 do 31. decembra 1999;
The market for Organic Peroxides
Trg za organske perokside
An organic peroxide is any organic molecule containing a ‘peroxy’ or oxygen-oxygen bond (-O-O-).
Organski peroksid je vsaka organska molekula, ki vsebuje „peroksi“ vez ali vez kisik-kisik (–O–O–).
Organic peroxides (hereinafter OP) are highly explosive and major accidents are not rare in the industry.
Organski peroksidi (v nadaljevanju „OP“) so močno eksplozivni, zato so v industriji velike nesreče pogoste.
They are available as solids (usually fine powders), liquids or pastes.
Obstajajo v trdem stanju (običajno kot droben prah), tekočem stanju ali kot paste.
OP and mixtures containing OP are used as accelerators, activators, catalysts, cross-linking agents, curing agents, hardeners, initiators and promoters.
OP in mešanice, ki vsebujejo OP, se uporabljajo kot pospeševalci, aktivatorji, katalizatorji, sredstva za povezovanje, sredstva za dozorevanje, utrjevalci, sprožilci reakcij in promotorji.
OP can be distinguished both by their three main ‘applications’ and by the seven ‘classes’.
OP se lahko razlikuje po treh glavnih načinih „uporabe“ in po sedmih „razredih“.
OP serve a critically important role in the plastics and rubber industries where they serve three main applications:
OP ima izredno pomembno vlogo v plastični in gumarski industriji, v kateri se uporabljajo trije glavni načini uporabe OP:
the polymerisation of thermoplastic resins (so-called high polymer or HP applications)
polimerizacija termoplastičnih smol (tako imenovani dolgi polimeri ali uporaba „HP“);
the curing of unsaturated polyester thermoset resins (so-called UP applications)
zorenje nenasičene termoreaktivne poliestrske smole (tako imenovana uporaba „UP“);
cross-linking (so-called XL applications).
kovalentno povezovanje (tako imenovana uporaba „XL“).
The Commission has found that the geographic scope of this business is at least EEA-wide.
Komisija je ugotovila, da obsega geografsko področje tega posla najmanj področje EGP.
In 1999, the last full year of the infringement, the cartel covered more than 90 % of the EEA market for the product concerned, this market having a total estimated value in that year of EUR 250 million.
Leta 1999, zadnje leto kršitve, je kartel pokrival več kot 90 % trga EGP za zadevni proizvod in imel ocenjeno skupno vrednost na 250 milijonov EUR.
Functioning of the cartel
Delovanje kartela
A main agreement started in 1971, with initially three participating members (Akzo, Peroxid-Chemie and Atofina (at that time Luperox)).
Glavni sporazum je bil sklenjen leta 1971, s prvotno tremi sodelujočimi člani (Akzo, Peroxid Chemie in Atofina (takrat Luperox)).
It consisted of subarrangements for high polymer and thermoset-OP, and was also split up by regional criteria.
Vseboval je več podsporazumov za dolge polimere in termoreaktivne OP ter je bil razdeljen po regionalnem načelu.
Regional subarrangements concerned France (until 1992), United Kingdom (until 1992), Spain (since the end of 1975) and the rest of Europe, following the main principles and rules of the overall agreement.
Regionalni podsporazumi so vključevali Francijo (do leta 1992), Združeno kraljestvo (do leta 1992), Španijo (od konca leta 1975) in preostalo Evropo, ob upoštevanju glavnih načel in pravil splošnega sporazuma.
For Cross-linking OP, another subarrangement was made in 1983, covering as well most European countries.
Za OP kot sredstva za povezovanje je bil leta 1983 sklenjen nov podsporazum, ki je pokrival tudi večino evropskih držav.
These subarrangements had a substantial overlap with the overall agreement, e.g. the period under question, the mechanisms of mutual control and compensation, the parties, the products, the clients or the acting persons concerned can be found in each of the subarrangements.
Ti podsporazumi so precej sovpadali s splošnim sporazumom, npr. zadevno obdobje, mehanizmi za skupni nadzor in nadomestila, sodelujoče strani, proizvodi, stranke ali zadevne dejavne osebe so bili prisotni v vsakem od podsporazumov.
The main agreement aimed at preserving market shares and coordinating price increases and is based on a written ‘contract’ from 1971.
Glavni sporazum je bil namenjen za ohranjanje tržnega deleža in usklajevanje zviševanja cen, temelji pa na pismeni pogodbi iz leta 1971.
In order to achieve this, objective, detailed sales data of the participating companies were closely monitored by an independent body (AC Treuhand since 1993), clients were allocated and, in case of deviation from the intended market share, compensations were applied or clients were reallocated.
Za dosego tega cilja je podrobne podatke o prodaji za sodelujoča podjetja skrbno spremljal neodvisni organ (AC Treuhand od leta 1993), opredeljene so bile stranke in bila so, v primeru odstopanj od načrtovanega tržnega deleža, določena nadomestila ali ponovno določene stranke.
Regular meetings took place in order to fine-tune the working of the agreement.
Izvajala so se redna srečanja za prilagoditev izvajanja sporazuma.
The agreement contained numerous subarrangements on specific products or subproducts, or concerning regions.
Sporazum je vseboval številne podsporazume o posebnih proizvodih ali podproizvodih ter o zadevnih regijah.
These subarrangements have, in part, only lasted for a limited period of time or have been integrated in other subarrangements.
Ti podsporazumi so imeli večinoma omejeno obdobje trajanja ali so bili vključeni v druge podsporazume.
Perorsa was involved in a Spanish subarrangement.
Podjetje Perorsa je bilo vključeno v španski podsporazum.
AC Treuhand was found to have violated Article 81 of the Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement by organising meetings, mediating conflicts, proposing market shares and hiding incriminating evidence.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je podjetje AC Treuhand kršilo člen 81 Pogodbe in člen 53 Sporazuma EGP z organizacijo sestankov, s posredovanjem v sporih, s predlaganjem tržnih deležev in s prikrivanjem obremenilnih dokazov.
AC Treuhand acted as an association of undertakings and/or as an undertaking.
Podjetje AC Treuhand je delovalo kot združenje podjetij in/ali kot podjetje.
The cartel underwent frictions in 1992 and ended at the end of 1999, after the parties' attempts to agree on quotas failed.
V kartelu je prišlo do nesoglasij leta 1992 in je konec leta 1999 razpadel, potem ko so propadli poskusi strank o sporazumu o kvotah.
Some subarrangements ended earlier.
Nekateri podsporazumi so se iztekli že prej.
FINES
DENARNE KAZNI
Basic amount
Osnovni zneski
The Commission considers that the undertakings concerned have committed a very serious infringement.
Komisija meni, da so zadevna podjetja zagrešila izredno resno kršitev.
The nature of the infringement and its geographic scope are such that the infringement must qualify as very serious, irrespective of whether or not the impact of the infringement on the market can be measured.
Narava kršitve in njen geografski obseg opredeljujeta kršitev kot zelo resno, ne glede na to, ali se lahko vpliv kršitve na trg izmeri ali ne.
Differential treatment
Različno obravnavanje
Within the category of very serious infringements, the scale of likely fines makes it possible to apply differential treatment to undertakings in order to take account of the effective economic capacity of the offenders to cause significant damage to competition, as well as to set the fine at a level which ensures that it has sufficient deterrent effect.
Stopnja možnih kazni omogoča znotraj obsega zelo resnih kršitev uporabo različnega obravnavanja podjetij, da se lahko upošteva učinkovito gospodarsko zmožnost kršiteljev, ki so povzročili precejšnjo škodo konkurenci, pa tudi določitev kazni na raven, ki zagotavlja učinkovito opozorilo.
With a share of more than 40 % of the total of these markets, Akzo is the largest producer and should, therefore, be placed in the first category.
Podjetje Akzo je največji proizvajalec, z deležem več kot od 40 % celotnega trga, in je zato uvrščeno v prvo kategorijo.
Atofina and Peroxid-Chemie, with shares of around 20 to 25 % of the market, should be placed in the second category.
Podjetji Atofina in Peroxid Chemie, z deležema okrog od 20 % do 25 % trga, sta uvrščeni v drugo kategorijo.
Perorsa, with a market share under 5 % in Europe, should be in the third category.
Podjetje Perorsa, s tržnim deležem pod 5 % v Evropi, je v tretji kategoriji.
Degussa UK Holdings (formerly called Laporte plc) is, since 1 September 1992, the parent company of Peroxid-Chemie and should be placed in the same category as Peroxid-Chemie, as it is jointly responsible with Peroxid-Chemie for the illicit activities of Peroxid-Chemie.
Podjetje Degussa UK Holdings (prej podjetje Laporte plc.) je od 1. septembra 1992 matično podjetje podjetja Peroxid Chemie in je uvrščeno v isto kategorijo kot podjetje Peroxid Chemie, ker sta skupaj odgovorni za nezakonite dejavnosti.
AC Treuhand is considered apart.
Podjetje AC Treuhand se obravnava posebej.
The Commission acknowledges that addressing a decision to an undertaking and/or association of undertakings having a role of this kind in a cartel is to a certain extent a novelty.
Komisija priznava, da predstavlja naslavljanje odločbe na podjetje in/ali na združenje podjetij v kartelu do določene mere novost.
This has to be taken into account when deciding on the level of fines.
To je treba upoštevati pri določanju ravni kazni.
In view of the foregoing the Commission considers it appropriate to impose a fine on AC Treuhand of EUR 1000.
Komisija zaradi gornjih navedb meni, da je podjetju AC Treuhand primerno naložiti kazen v višini 1000 EUR.
To take into account the size and aggregate resources of the undertakings and ensure that the fine has an adequate deterrent effect, the Commission considers that the starting amount should be adjusted for Akzo and Atofina.
Komisija meni, da bi začeten znesek morali prilagoditi podjetjema Akzo in Atofina, ob upoštevanju višine in skupnih sredstev podjetij, ter zagotoviti, da ima kazen ustrezno učinkovito opozorilo.
The Commission has established that, Akzo, Atofina, and Peroxid-Chemie infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty from 1 January 1971 until 31 December 1999, Perorsa from at least 31 December 1975 until 31 December 1999 and Degussa UK Holdings from 1 September 1992 until 31 December 1999, AC Treuhand acted as an undertaking and/or association of undertakings from 28 December 1993 until 31 December 1999.
Komisija je ugotovila, da so podjetja Akzo, Atofina in Peroxid Chemie kršila člen 81(1) Pogodbe od 1. januarja 1971 do 31. decembra 1999, podjetje Perorsa od najmanj 31. decembra 1975 do 31. decembra 1999 in podjetje Degussa UK Holdings od 1. septembra 1992 do 31. decembra 1999, podjetje AC Treuhand pa je delovalo kot podjetje in/ali kot združenje podjetij od 28. decembra 1993 do 31. decembra 1999.
For the purpose of calculating the fine, the Commission takes into account complete months and therefore fixes as the duration of the infringement by these undertakings a period of 29 years (Akzo, Atofina and Peroxid-Chemie), a period of 6 years (AC Treuhand), a period of 7 years and 4 months (Degussa UK Holdings) and a period of 24 years (Perorsa).
Komisija upošteva zaradi izračunavanja kazni vse mesece in zato določi za trajanje kršitve podjetij obdobje 29 let (podjetja Akzo, Atofina in Peroxid Chemie), obdobje 6 let (podjetje AC Treuhand), obdobje 7 let in 4 mesecev (podjetje Degussa UK Holdings) in obdobje 24 let (podjetje Perorsa).
For Peroxid-Chemie the period is split up in two subperiods, when it was responsible alone (21 years 8 months) and when it was responsible together with its parent company Degussa UK Holdings (7 years and 4 months).
Za podjetje Peroxid Chemie je obdobje razdeljeno na dve podobdobji, ko je bilo samo odgovorno (21 let in 8 mesecev) in ko je bilo podjetje odgovorno skupaj z matičnim podjetjem Degussa UK Holdings (7 let in 4 mesece).
The Commission concludes that the infringement was of long duration (more than five years) for AC Treuhand, Akzo, Atofina, Degussa UK Holdings, Peroxid-Chemie and Perorsa.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila kršitev podjetij AC Treuhand, Akzo, Atofina, Degussa UK Holdings, Peroxid Chemie in Perorsa dolgotrajna (več kot pet let).
Accordingly increases of 245 % should be applied to the basic amounts of the fine imposed on Akzo and Atofina.
Zato se v skladu s tem uporabi povišanje za 245 % na osnovni znesek kazni za podjetji Akzo in Atofina.
Increases of 207,5 % should be applied to the basic amount of the fine imposed on Peroxid-Chemie.
Povišanje za 207,5 % na osnovni znesek kazni se uporabi za podjetje Peroxid Chemie.
Increases of 70 % should be applied to the basic amounts of the fine imposed on Peroxid-Chemie/Degussa UK Holdings.
Povišanje za 70 % na osnovni znesek kazni se uporabi za podjetje Peroxid Chemie/Degussa UK Holdings.
Increases of 220 % should be applied to the basic amount of the fine imposed on Perorsa.
Povišanje za 220 % na osnovni znesek kazni se uporabi za podjetje Perorsa.
These percentages are derived from increase of 10 % per year for the last twenty years of the infringement (1980 to 1999), and an increase of 5 % per year for the part of the infringement which took place 21 to 29 years ago (1971 to 1979).
Ti odstotki izhajajo iz povišanja 10 % letno v zadnjih dvajsetih letih kršenja (1980–1999) in iz povišanja 5 % letno za obdobje kršenja izpred 21 do 29 let (1971–1979).
Atofina has been fined previously for its involvement in four cartels, and Peroxid-Chemie/Degussa UK Holdings have been fined for their involvement in one cartel.
Podjetje Atofina je že bilo kaznovano zaradi udeležbe v štirih kartelih, podjetji Peroxid Chemie/Degussa UK Holdings pa sta bili kaznovani za udeležbo v enem kartelu.
Therefore repeat offence will be considered as aggravating circumstance.
Torej se ponovna kršitev obravnava kot oteževalna okoliščina.
The Commission accordingly considers that the basic amount of the fine to be imposed should be increased by 50 % in the case of Atofina to reflect the fact that it had already been an addressee of Commission decisions in a considerable number of previous cartel cases, and by 50 % in the cases of Degussa UK Holdings and Peroxid-Chemie, to reflect the fact that they had been the addressee of one previous Commission cartel decision, either directly (Degussa UK Holdings) or through the undertaking to which it belonged (Peroxid-Chemie).
Komisija v skladu s tem meni, da se osnovni znesek kazni v primeru podjetja Atofina poviša za 50 %, s poudarkom, da je podjetje že bilo naslovnik odločb Komisije v številnih prejšnjih primerih kartelov, in za 50 % v primeru podjetij Degussa UK Holdings in Peroxid Chemie, s poudarkom, da sta podjetji že bili naslovnika ene odločbe Komisije o kartelu, neposredno (Degussa UK Holdings) ali prek matičnega podjetja (Peroxid Chemie).
Attenuating circumstances
Olajševalne okoliščine
Atofina strengthened the Commission’s arguments to prove the 29 year duration of the cartel.
Podjetje Atofina je okrepilo argumente Komisije, da dokaže devetindvajsetletni obstoj kartela.
In line with a principle of fairness, it is proposed to apply a specific attenuating circumstance ‘co-operation outside the Leniency notice’ for Atofina.
V skladu z načelom poštenosti se predlaga uporaba posebnih olajševalnih okoliščin za „sodelovanje brez obvestila o prizanesljivosti“ podjetju Atofina.
This attenuating circumstance will prevent that Atofina would pay a higher fine after its co-operation than it would have paid without co-operation.
Olajševalne okoliščine bodo podjetju Atofina preprečile, da, potem ko je sodelovalo, plača višjo kazen, kot bi jo sicer plačalo brez sodelovanja.
In the light of the above, the Commission does consider it appropriate to grant a reduction of the basic amount of EUR 94,19 million for effective cooperation outside the scope of the leniency notice for Atofina.
Komisija glede na zgoraj omenjeno meni, da je primerno zagotoviti znižanje osnovnega zneska 94,19 milijona EUR za učinkovito sodelovanje brez obvestila o prizanesljivosti za podjetje Atofina.
Application of the 10 % turnover limit
Uporaba 10 % meje prometa
The 10 % worldwide turnover limit mentioned in Article 15(2) of Regulation 17 applies to Perorsa and Peroxid-Chemie.
10-odstotna meja prometa na svetovnem trgu, omenjena v členu 15(2) Uredbe št. 17, velja za podjetji Perorsa in Peroxid Chemie.
Application of the 1996 Leniency Notice
Uporaba obvestila o prizanesljivosti 1996
Non-imposition or a very substantial reduction in its amount (Section B: 75 to 100 % reduction)
Neobdavčitev ali znatno znižanje zneska („Razdelek B“: 75–100 % znižanja)
Akzo is granted immunity from fines for having been the first undertaking to report the cartel to the Commission.
Podjetje Akzo je oproščeno plačila kazni, ker je bilo prvo podjetje, ki je Komisiji poročalo o kartelu.
Significant reduction of a fine (Section D: reduction from 10 to 50 %)
Znatno znižanje kazni („Razdelek D“: znižanje od 10 % do 50 %)
Atofina is granted a 50 % reduction for its cooperation in the Commission’s investigation.
Podjetju Atofina je dodeljeno 50-odstotno znižanje za sodelovanje pri preiskavi Komisije.
Among the companies qualifying for a significant fine reduction, Atofina was the first company to co-operate with the Commission and provided the most useful contribution.
Med podjetji, ki se potegujejo za znatno znižanje kazni, je bilo podjetje Atofina prvo podjetje, ki je sodelovalo s Komisijo in zagotovilo najbolj uporaben prispevek.
Like the other companies that cooperated with the Commission, it also did not substantially contest the facts on which the Commission based its allegations.
Kot tudi druga podjetja, ki so sodelovala s Komisijo, ni bistveno spodbijalo dejstev, na katerih temeljijo trditve Komisije.
Peroxid-Chemie and Degussa UK Holdings are granted a 25 % reduction for their co-operation in the Commission’s investigation.
Podjetjema Peroxid Chemie in Degussa UK Holdings je dodeljeno 25-odstotno znižanje za sodelovanje pri preiskavi Komisije.
The evidence it provided arrived later and its co-operation was more limited than that of Akzo and Atofina.
Posredovan dokaz je prišel kasneje, sodelovanje pa je bilo bolj omejeno kot pri podjetjih Akzo in Atofina.
Perorsa, which was the last company to cooperate, is granted a 15 % reduction.
Podjetju Perorsa, ki je sodelovalo kot zadnje podjetje, je dodeljeno 15-odstotno znižanje.
Ability to pay
Sposobnost plačila
No company claimed inability to pay.
Nobeno podjetje ni zahtevalo nezmožnosti za plačilo.
Decision
Sklep
The following fines are imposed:
Uvedene so naslednje kazni:
Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV, Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV, jointly and severally liable
Akzo Nobel Polymer Chemicals BV, Akzo Nobel NV, Akzo Nobel Chemicals International BV, solidarno odgovorna
EUR 43,47 million
43,47 milijona EUR
EUR 8,83 million
8,83 milijona EUR
Peroxd-Chemie GmbH & Co. KG and Degussa UK Holdings Limited, jointly and severally liable
Peroxid Chemie GmbH & Co. KG in Degussa UK Holdings Limited, solidarno odgovorna
EUR 16,73 million
16,73 milijona EUR
EUR 0,50 million,
0,50 milijona EUR.
The undertakings and/or associations of undertakings listed shall immediately bring the infringements to an end, in so far as they have not already done so.
Našteta podjetja in/ali združenja podjetij morajo takoj prenehati s kršitvami, če tega še niso storila.
They shall refrain from repeating any act or conduct as the infringement found in this case and from any act or conduct having the same or similar object or effect.
Vzdržijo naj se ponavljanja kakršnega koli dejanja ali postopka kršenja, tako kot v tem primeru, in kakršnih koli dejanj ali postopkov, ki imajo enak ali podoben cilj oziroma učinek.
OJ 13, 21.2.1962, p. 204/62.
UL 13, 21.2.1962, str. 204/62.