natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is the Court's experience that, save in exceptional circumstances, effective pleadings need not exceed 10 or 15 pages and replies, rejoinders and responses can be limited to 5 to 10 pages.
Po izkušnjah Sodišče se uporabna vloga lahko omeji, razen v izjemnih primerih, na 10 do 15 strani, odgovor na tožbo, replike in duplike pa so lahko omejene na 5 do 10 strani.
APPLICATIONS FOR EXPEDITED PROCEDURE
PREDLOG ZA OBRAVNAVNAJE V HITREM POSTOPKU
A party applying by separate document under Article 62a of the Rules of Procedure for a case to be decided by the Court by expedited procedure must briefly state the reasons for the special urgency of the case.
Stranka, ki z ločeno vlogo, skladno s členom 62a poslovnika, predlaga, da Sodišče zadevo obravnava v hitrem postopku, mora na kratko obrazložiti, v čem je posebna nujnost zadeve.
Save in exceptional circumstances, that application must not exceed five pages.
Takšen predlog, razen v izjemnih primerih, ne sme biti daljši od 5 strani.
As the expedited procedure is largely oral, the pleading of the party requesting it must be confined to a summary of the pleas relied upon.
Hitri postopek je predvsem ustni postopek, stranka, ki ga predlaga, mora svojo vlogo omejiti na strnjen povzetek navedenih razlogov.
Such pleadings must not, save in exceptional circumstances, exceed 10 pages.
Takšna vloga, razen v izjemnih primerih, ne sme biti daljša od 10 strani.
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO LODGE A REPLY IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
PREDLOG ZA ODOBRITEV REPLIKE V POSTOPKU S PRITOŽBO
The President may, on application, allow a reply to be lodged if it is necessary in order to enable the appellant to defend its point of view or in order to provide a basis for the decision on the appeal.
Predsednik na predlog tožeče stranke lahko dovoli vložitev replike, če je le-ta potrebna zato, da tožeča stranka brani svoje stališče oziroma za pripravo odločbe o pritožbi.
Save in exceptional circumstances such an application must not exceed 2 to 3 pages and must be confined to summarising the precise reasons for which, in the appellant's opinion, a reply is necessary.
Takšna vloga, razen v izjemnih primerih, ne sme biti daljša od 2 do 3 strani in mora biti omejena na kratek povzetek posebnih razlogov, zaradi katerih je, po mnenju tožeče stranke, replika potrebna.
The request must be comprehensible in itself without any need to refer to the appeal or the response.
Predlog mora biti sam po sebi razumljiv, ne da bi bilo treba pogledati v pritožbeno vlogo ali odgovor na pritožbo.
APPLICATIONS FOR HEARING OF ORAL ARGUMENT
PREDLOGI ZA USTNO OBRAVNAVO
The Court may decide not to hear oral argument where none of the parties has applied to be heard (Articles 44a and 120 of the Rules of Procedure).
Sodišče lahko odloči, da se ustna obravnava ne opravi, če nobena od strank ni predlagala, da se ji omogoči, da ustno pojasni svoja stališča (člen 44a in 120 poslovnika).
In practice, it is rare for a hearing to be organised in the absence of such an application.
V praksi se ustna obravnava, kolikor zanjo ni bil podan predlog, redko opravi.
The application must specify why the party wishes to be heard.
V predlogu je treba navesti razloge, zaradi katerih stranka želi ustno podati navedbe.
That reasoning must be based on a real assessment of the benefit of a hearing to the party in question and must indicate the documentary elements or arguments which that party considers it necessary to develop or disprove more fully at a hearing.
Obrazložitev mora izhajati iz konkretne ocene koristnosti ustnega podajanja navedb za zadevno stranko, v njej je treba navesti elemente v spisu ali argumentacijo, za katere ta stranka meni, da jih je potrebno razviti ali še dodatno zavrniti na obravnavi.
It is not sufficient to provide a general statement of reasons referring to the importance of the case or of the questions to be decided.
Splošna obrazložitev, ki se sklicuje na pomembnost zadeve ali vprašanj, o katerih je treba odločiti, ne zadostuje.
PREPARATION AND CONDUCT OF HEARINGS
PRIPRAVA IN POTEK USTNIH OBRAVNAV
Before the hearing begins the agents or lawyers are called to a short meeting with the relevant formation of the Court, in order to plan the hearing.
Pred začetkom obravnave se zastopnike in odvetnike povabi na kratek sestanek s sodečim senatom, ki je namenjen pripravi obravnave.
At that point the Judge-Rapporteur and the Advocate General may indicate the matters they wish to hear developed in the arguments.
Sodnik poročevalec in generalni pravobranilec lahko ob tej priložnosti opredelijo točke, glede katerih so zaželena dodatna pojasnila v ustni obravnavi.
Oral argument is limited to 30 minutes maximum before the full Court, the Grand Chamber or a chamber of five Judges and to 15 minutes maximum before a Chamber of three Judges.
Podajanje ustnih navedb pred občnim senatom, velikim senatom ali senatom petih sodnikov je omejeno na največ 30 minut in na največ 15 minut pred senatom treh sodnikov.
Before any formation the presentation of an intervener's argument is limited to 15 minutes maximum.
Podajanje ustnih navedb intervenienta je pred vsemi senati omejeno na največ 15 minut.
Speaking time may exceptionally be extended beyond those limits on application made to the President of the formation concerned together with a detailed statement of reasons.
Podaljšanje tega časa preko navedenih omejitev se izjemoma lahko dovoli na obrazložen predlog, naslovljen na predsednika zadevnega senata.
The application must reach the Court as soon as possible and in order to be taken into consideration, at the latest two weeks before the date of the hearing.
Navedeni predlog mora Sodišče prejeti čim prej, vendar najkasneje dva tedna pred rokom za obravnavo.
The notification of the hearing asks the agents and lawyers to inform the Registry of the likely duration of their oral arguments.
V vabilu na obravnavo so zastopniki in odvetniki povabljeni, da sodnega tajnika obvestijo o predvidenem trajanju podajanja ustnih navedb.
The information supplied is used in the planning of the business of the Court and the Chambers, and it is not possible to exceed the speaking time requested.
Ti podatki služijo načrtovanju dela Sodišča in senatov, najavljenega časa se ne sme prekoračiti.
Having read the written pleadings, the Judges and the Advocate General are already familiar with the case, its subject matter and the pleas in law and arguments put forward by the parties.
Sodniki in generalni pravobranilec, ki obravnavajo zadevo, so preko pisnih vlog že dobro seznanjeni z zadevo, njenim predmetom, tožbenimi razlogi in navedbami, ki so jih stranke predložile.
The purpose of oral argument is not to present a party's point of view afresh but to clarify any matters which the agent or lawyer regards as particularly important, especially those referred to in the application for a hearing (see paragraph 42 above).
Namen ustnega obravnavanja ni na novo predstaviti stališča stranke, temveč osvetliti točke, za katere zastopnik ali odvetnik meni, da so posebej pomembne, zlasti tiste, ki so bile navedene v morebitnem predlogu za obravnavo (glej zgoraj točka 48).
Repetition of what has already been stated in the written pleadings must be avoided; if necessary, a reference to the pleadings during the course of the oral argument will suffice.
Treba se je izogniti ponavljanju tistega, kar je že bilo navedeno v pisnih vlogah; če je to potrebno pri podajanju ustnih navedb zadostuje že sklicevanje nanje.
Oral submissions should begin by outlining the plan to be followed.
Ustno podajanje navedb je priporočljivo začeti s predstavitvijo njihove strukture.
Very frequently the Judges and Advocate General will listen to oral argument via simultaneous interpretation.
Člani senata zelo pogosto spremljajo podajanje ustnih navedb preko simultanega prevajanja.
In order to make that interpretation possible, agents and lawyers should speak at a natural and unforced pace and use short sentences of simple structure.
Zaradi potreb tolmačenja je treba govoriti v normalnem ritmu in ne prehitro, uporabljati kratke stavke in enostavne strukture.
It is inadvisable to read out a text prepared in advance.
Odsvetujemo branje vnaprej napisanega besedila.
It is preferable to speak on the basis of properly structured notes.
Zaželeno je, da se govori na podlagi dobro strukturiranih zapiskov.
If the oral argument is, nevertheless, prepared in writing, account should be taken in drafting the text of the fact that it is to be delivered orally and ought therefore to come as close as possible to oral exposition.
Vendarle, če je podajanje ustnih navedb pripravljeno v pisni obliki je pri pripravi besedila priporočljivo upoštevati dejstvo, da ga je treba ustno predstaviti, in naj se zato kar najbolj približa ustni predstavitvi.
To facilitate interpretation, agents and lawyers are requested to send the text or written outline of their oral argument by fax in advance to the Interpretation Division (fax (352) 43 03 36 97).
Zaradi lažjega tolmačenja zastopnike in odvetnike naprošamo, da morebitno besedilo ali pisni osnutek svojih navedb vnaprej poš-ljejo po telefaksu na Oddelek za tolmačenje (Faks (352) 4303-3697).
Done at Luxembourg, 15 October 2004.
V Luxembourgu, 15. oktobra 2004
The Court's postal address is: Court of Justice of the European CommunitiesL-2925 LUXEMBOURG.
Poštni naslov Sodišča: Cour de justice des Communautés européennesL-2925 LUXEMBOURG.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) 1004/2004 of 18 May 2004 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1004/2004 z dne 18. maja 2004 o uvedbi vrednosti na enoto za določitev carinske vrednosti za nekatero pokvarljivo blago
(Official Journal of the European Union L 183 of 20 May 2004)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 183, z dne 20. maja 2004)
On page 26, in the Annex, under the code heading 2.200 (Strawberries):
V Prilogi, na strani 26, pod oznako 2.200 (Jagode):
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 of 22 March 2004 amending the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Communities
Popravek Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 723/2004 z dne 22. marca 2004 o spremembi Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti
(Official Journal of the European Union L 124 of 27 April 2004)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 124 z dne 27. aprila 2004) (Slovenska posebna izdaja, poglavje 1, zvezek 2, str. 130)
On page 65, Annex I, point 102, new Annex XII, Chapter 1, Article 1(2):
Stran 194, točka 102, Priloga XII, poglavje 1, člen 1(2): besedilo:
‘… and in the rate of annual change in the salary scales of EC officials as defined in Article 11 of this Annex.’,
Ob pripravi pregleda iz člena 83a(4) Kadrovskih predpisov Komisija vsako leto posodobi aktuarsko oceno, pri čemer upošteva populacijske spremembe, opredeljene v členu 9 te priloge, spremembe obrestne mere, opredeljene v členu 10 te priloge in stopnje letne spremembe plačnih lestvic uradnikov EU, opredeljene v členu 11 te priloge.“
read:
se glasi: „2.
‘… and in the rate of annual change in the salary scales of officials as defined in Article 11 of this Annex.’.
Ob pripravi pregleda iz člena 83a(4) Kadrovskih predpisov Komisija vsako leto posodobi aktuarsko oceno, pri čemer upošteva populacijske spremembe, opredeljene v členu 9 te priloge, spremembe obrestne mere, opredeljene v členu 10 te priloge in stopnje letne spremembe plačnih lestvic uradnikov, opredeljene v členu 11 te priloge.“
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
Popravek Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 553/2008 z dne 17. junija 2008 o spremembi Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) št. 999/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi predpisov za preprečevanje, nadzor in izkoreninjenje nekaterih transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij
The publication of this Regulation in the above mentioned Official Journal is annulled.
Objava Uredbe v zgoraj navedenem Uradnem listu se razveljavi.
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2006/109/EC of 19 January 2006 accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of certain castings originating in the People's Republic of China
Popravek Sklepa Komisije 2006/109/ES z dne 19. januarja 2006 o sprejetju zaveze v zvezi s protidampinškim postopkom glede uvoza nekaterih ulitkov s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
(Official Journal of the European Union L 47 of 17 February 2006)
(Uradni list Evropske unije L 47 z dne 17. februarja 2006)
On page 61, in Article 1, under the 15th exporting producer on the list:
Stran 61, člen 1, 15. proizvajalec izvoznik na seznamu:
‘Shane City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shane City, Hebei Province’,
„Shane City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shane City, Hebei Province“
‘Shahe City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shahe City, Hebei Province’.
„Shahe City Fangyuan Casting Co., Ltd., West of Nango Village, Shiliting Town, Shahe City, Hebei Province“.
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2004/761/EC of 26 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Directive 93/24/EEC as regards the statistical surveys on cattle population and production
Popravek k Odločbi Komisije z dne 26. oktobra 2004 ki določa ukrepe za uporabo Direktive Sveta 93/24/EGS, ki se nanaša na statistične ankete glede staleža in prireje na področju govedoreje
On page 67, Annex II, for Latvia:
Na strani 67, Priloga II, za Latvijo:
A Reporting Financial Institution must implement procedures to ensure that a relationship manager identifies any change in circumstances of an account.
D. Pregled Že obstoječih računov visoke vrednosti, katerih imetniki so posamezniki, mora biti končan do 31. decembra 2016.
For example, if a relationship manager is notified that the Account Holder has a new mailing address in a Reportable Jurisdiction, the Reporting Financial Institution is required to treat the new address as a change in circumstances and, if it elects to apply subparagraph B(6), is required to obtain the appropriate documentation from the Account Holder.
Pregled Že obstoječih računov nižje vrednosti, katerih imetniki so posamezniki, mora biti končan do 31. decembra 2017.
D. Review of Preexisting High Value Individual Accounts must be completed by 31 December 2016.
E. Kateri koli Že obstoječi račun posameznika, ki je bil v skladu s tem oddelkom identificiran kot Račun, o katerem se poroča, se v vseh nadaljnjih letih obravnava kot Račun, o katerem se poroča, razen če Imetnik računa ni več Oseba, o kateri se poroča.
Review of Preexisting Lower Value Individual Accounts must be completed by 31 December 2017.
ODDELEK IV:
E. Any Preexisting Individual Account that has been identified as a Reportable Account under this Section must be treated as a Reportable Account in all subsequent years, unless the Account Holder ceases to be a Reportable Person.
DOLŽNA SKRBNOST PRI NOVIH RAČUNIH POSAMEZNIKOV
SECTION IV
Za opredelitev Računov, o katerih se poroča, med Novimi računi posameznikov se uporabljajo naslednji postopki.
DUE DILIGENCE FOR NEW INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS
A. Pri Novih računih posameznikov mora Poročevalska finančna institucija ob odprtju računa pridobiti samopotrdilo, ki je lahko del dokumentacije za odprtje računa in ji omogoča ugotoviti, kje je Imetnik računa rezident za davčne namene, ter potrditi sprejemljivost takega samopotrdila na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je Poročevalska finančna institucija pridobila v zvezi z odprtjem računa, vključno s kakršno koli dokumentacijo, zbrano v skladu s Postopki za preprečevanje pranja denarja ali poznavanje strank.
The following procedures apply for purposes of identifying Reportable Accounts among New Individual Accounts.
B. Če je iz samopotrdila razvidno, da je Imetnik računa za davčne namene rezident Jurisdikcije, o kateri se poroča, mora Poročevalska finančna institucija račun obravnavati kot Račun, o katerem se poroča, v samopotrdilu pa morata biti navedena tudi IŠD Imetnika računa za takšno Jurisdikcijo, o kateri se poroča (v skladu z odstavkom D oddelka I), in datum rojstva.
A. With respect to New Individual Accounts, upon account opening, the Reporting Financial Institution must obtain a self-certification, which may be part of the account opening documentation, that allows the Reporting Financial Institution to determine the Account Holder's residence(s) for tax purposes and confirm the reasonableness of such self-certification based on the information obtained by the Reporting Financial Institution in connection with the opening of the account, including any documentation collected pursuant to AML/KYC Procedures.
C. Če se spremenijo okoliščine v zvezi z Novim računom posameznika, zaradi česar Poročevalska finančna institucija spozna ali utemeljeno domneva, da je prvotno samopotrdilo nepravilno ali nezanesljivo, se Poročevalska finančna institucija ne more zanašati na to samopotrdilo, zato mora pridobiti veljavno samopotrdilo, iz katerega je razvidno, kje je Imetnik računa rezident za davčne namene.
B. If the self-certification establishes that the Account Holder is resident for tax purposes in a Reportable Jurisdiction, the Reporting Financial Institution must treat the account as a Reportable Account and the self-certification must also include the Account Holder's TIN with respect to such Reportable Jurisdiction (subject to paragraph D of Section I) and date of birth.
ODDELEK V:
C. If there is a change of circumstances with respect to a New Individual Account that causes the Reporting Financial Institution to know, or have reason to know, that the original self-certification is incorrect or unreliable, the Reporting Financial Institution cannot rely on the original self-certification and must obtain a valid self-certification that establishes the residence(s) for tax purposes of the Account Holder.
DOLŽNA SKRBNOST PRI ŽE OBSTOJEČIH RAČUNIH SUBJEKTOV
SECTION V
Za opredelitev Računov, o katerih se poroča, med Že obstoječimi računi subjektov se uporabljajo naslednji postopki.
DUE DILIGENCE FOR PREEXISTING ENTITY ACCOUNTS
A. Računi subjektov, za katere se ne zahteva pregled, identificiranje ali poročanje.
The following procedures apply for purposes of identifying Reportable Accounts among Preexisting Entity Accounts.
Razen če se Poročevalska finančna institucija odloči drugače glede vseh Že obstoječih računov subjektov ali posebej glede katere koli jasno identificirane skupine takšnih računov, se za Že obstoječi račun subjekta s skupnim stanjem ali vrednostjo, ki na dan 31. decembra 2015 ne presega v domači valuti posamezne države članice ali Lihtenštajna izraženega zneska in ustreza 250000 USD, ne zahteva pregled, identificiranje ali poročanje kot za Račun, o katerem se poroča, dokler skupno stanje na računu ali vrednost ne preseže tega zneska na zadnji dan naslednjega koledarskega leta.
A. Entity Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified or Reported.
B. Računi subjektov, ki se pregledujejo.
Unless the Reporting Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all Preexisting Entity Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group of such accounts, a Preexisting Entity Account with an aggregate account balance or value that does not exceed, as of 31 December 2015, an amount denominated in the domestic currency of each Member State or Liechtenstein and corresponding to USD 250000 is not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported as a Reportable Account until the aggregate account balance or value exceeds that amount as of the last day of any subsequent calendar year.
Že obstoječi račun subjekta s skupnim stanjem ali vrednostjo, ki na dan 31. decembra 2015 presega v domači valuti posamezne države članice ali Lihtenštajna izražen znesek in ustreza 250000 USD, in Že obstoječi račun subjekta, ki na dan 31. decembra 2015 ne presega navedenega zneska, vendar njegovo skupno stanje ali vrednost preseže takšen znesek na zadnji dan katerega koli naslednjega koledarskega leta, morata biti pregledana v skladu s postopki iz odstavka D.
B. Entity Accounts Subject to Review.
C. Računi subjektov, za katere se zahteva poročanje.
A Preexisting Entity Account that has an aggregate account balance or value that exceeds, as of 31 December 2015, an amount denominated in the domestic currency of each Member State or Liechtenstein and corresponding to USD 250000, and a Preexisting Entity Account that does not exceed, as of 31 December 2015, that amount but the aggregate account balance or value of which exceeds such amount as of the last day of any subsequent calendar year, must be reviewed in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph D.
V zvezi z Že obstoječimi računi subjektov, opisanimi v odstavku B, se samo računi, ki jih ima en ali več Subjektov, ki so Osebe, o katerih se poroča, ali pa jih imajo Pasivni NFS z eno ali več Obvladujočimi osebami, ki so Osebe, o katerih se poroča, obravnavajo kot Računi, o katerih se poroča.
C. Entity Accounts With Respect to Which Reporting Is Required.
D. Postopki pregleda za identificiranje računov subjektov, za katere se zahteva poročanje.
With respect to Preexisting Entity Accounts described in paragraph B, only accounts that are held by one or more Entities that are Reportable Persons, or by Passive NFEs with one or more Controlling Persons who are Reportable Persons, shall be treated as Reportable Accounts.
Za Že obstoječe račune subjektov, opisane v odstavku B, mora Poročevalska finančna institucija uporabiti naslednje postopke pregleda, da ugotovi, ali ima račun ena ali več Oseb, o katerih se poroča, ali pa ga imajo Pasivni NFS z eno ali več Obvladujočimi osebami, ki so Osebe, o katerih se poroča:
D. Review Procedures for Identifying Entity Accounts With Respect to Which Reporting Is Required.
Ugotavljanje, ali je Subjekt Oseba, o kateri se poroča.
For Preexisting Entity Accounts described in paragraph B, a Reporting Financial Institution must apply the following review procedures to determine whether the account is held by one or more Reportable Persons, or by Passive NFEs with one or more Controlling Persons who are Reportable Persons:
Pregled podatkov, ki se hranijo v regulativne namene ali zaradi poslovanja s strankami (vključno s podatki, zbranimi v skladu s Postopki za preprečevanje pranja denarja ali poznavanje strank), da se ugotovi, ali je iz podatkov razvidno, da je Imetnik računa rezident Jurisdikcije, o kateri se poroča.
Determine Whether the Entity Is a Reportable Person.
Zato podatki, iz katerih je razvidno, da je Imetnik računa rezident v Jurisdikciji, o kateri se poroča, vključujejo kraj ustanovitve ali organiziranja ali naslov v Jurisdikciji, o kateri se poroča.
Review information maintained for regulatory or customer relationship purposes (including information collected pursuant to AML/KYC Procedures) to determine whether the information indicates that the Account Holder is resident in a Reportable Jurisdiction.
Če je iz podatkov razvidno, da je Imetnik računa rezident v Jurisdikciji, o kateri se poroča, mora Poročevalska finančna institucija račun obravnavati kot Račun, o katerem se poroča, razen če od Imetnika računa pridobi samopotrdilo ali če na podlagi podatkov, s katerimi razpolaga ali ki so javno dostopni, utemeljeno ugotovi, da Imetnik računa ni Oseba, o kateri se poroča.
For this purpose, information indicating that the Account Holder is resident in a Reportable Jurisdiction includes a place of incorporation or organisation, or an address in a Reportable Jurisdiction.
Ugotavljanje, ali je Subjekt Pasivni NFS z eno ali več Obvladujočimi osebami, ki so Osebe, o katerih se poroča.