natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The general methodology used to establish whether the imports into the Community of the product concerned have been dumped was described in recitals 19 to 34 of the provisional Regulation.
Splošna metodologija, ki se uporablja za ugotavljanje, ali gre pri uvozu zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost za damping, je opisana v uvodnih izjavah 19 do 34 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning normal value as set out in recitals 20 to 27 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti pripomb se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve glede normalne vrednosti, kot je določena v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 27 začasne uredbe.
Several companies argued that the exchange rates used by the Commission in making its provisional findings were incorrect, were not from a reliable public source and claimed that such exchange rates should rather come from an official verifiable source.
Več podjetij je dokazovalo, da so menjalni tečaji, ki jih je Komisija uporabljala v svojih začasnih ugotovitvah, nepravilni, niso prihajali iz zanesljivega javnega vira, in trdilo, da morajo ti menjalni tečaji prihajati iz uradnega preverljivega vira.
These claims have been thoroughly investigated and after verification, it was found that there were some errors in the exchange rates applied by the Commission in making its provisional findings.
Te trditve so bile temeljito preiskane in po preverjanju je bilo ugotovljeno, da je prišlo do nekaterih napak pri menjalnih tečajih, ki jih je uporabljala Komisija v svojih začasnih ugotovitvah.
Therefore, calculations have been revised on the basis of the monthly average exchange rates published by (i) the Commission for all conversions involving the euro (EUR); (ii) the Federal Reserve of the United States of America for all conversions between the USA dollar, the Chinese Yuan (CNY) and the Hong Kong dollar (HKD); and (iii) the Bank of China for conversions between HKD and CNY.
Zato so bili izračuni revidirani na podlagi mesečnega povprečja menjalnih tečajev, ki jih objavlja (i) Komisija za vse menjave, ki vključujejo evro (EUR); (ii) Ameriška centralna banka za vse menjave med ameriškim dolarjem (USD), kitajskim juanom (CNY) in hongkonškim dolarjem (HKD); in (iii) Kitajska centralna banka za menjave med HKD in CNY.
All these exchange rates have been applied, as was the case for the provisional calculations, on the basis of the monthly average exchange rate applicable to the month in which the sales invoice was issued.
Vsi ti menjalni tečaji se uporabljajo, tako kot so se uporabili v začasnih izračunih, na podlagi mesečnih povprečnih menjalnih tečajev, ki veljajo v mesecu, ko je izdana prodajna faktura.
In the absence of any comments concerning the basis on which normal value and export prices were compared, recital 30 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti pripomb glede osnove, na kateri so bile primerjane normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene, se potrdi uvodna izjava 30 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, recitals 31 to 34 of the provisional Regulation concerning the methodology applied for the calculation of the dumping margin are confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti pripomb se potrdijo uvodne izjave 31 do 34 začasne uredbe glede metodologije, ki se uporablja za izračun stopnje dampinga.
Only one of the two cooperating exporting producers made submissions following the imposition of the provisional measures.
Samo eden od dveh sodelujočih proizvajalcev-izvoznikov je predložil stališča po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov.
In the absence of any comments, the provisional findings concerning normal value, as set out in recital 36 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti pripomb se potrdijo začasne ugotovitve glede normalne vrednosti, kot je določena v uvodni izjavi 36 začasne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments other than those already mentioned in the above recitals 12 and 13, the methodology explained in recital 37 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti drugih pripomb, poleg tistih omenjenih v zgornjih uvodnih izjavah 12 in 13, se potrdi metodologija, ki je opisana v uvodni izjavi 37 začasne uredbe.
One exporting producer claimed that different allowances regarding after-sales technical assistance and marketing expenses had not been taken account of by the Commission in making its provisional findings.
En proizvajalec-izvoznik je trdil, da Komisija v svojih začasnih ugotovitvah ni upoštevala različnih dodatkov zaradi poprodajne tehnične pomoči in stroškov trženja.
The claim in regard to technical assistance was accepted after verification in accordance with Article 2(10)(h) of the basic Regulation.
Trditev glede tehnične pomoči je bila sprejeta po preverjanju v skladu s členom 2(10)(h) osnovne uredbe.
The claim regarding marketing expenses was accepted after verification in accordance with Article 2(10)(k) of the basic Regulation.
Trditev glede stroškov trženja je bila sprejeta po preverjanju v skladu s členom 2(10)(k) osnovne uredbe.
In the absence of any comments, the findings in recitals 39 to 41 of the provisional Regulation concerning the methodology applied for the calculation of the dumping margin, are hereby confirmed.
Ob odsotnosti pripomb se potrdijo ugotovitve v uvodnih izjavah 39 do 41 začasne uredbe glede metodologije, ki se uporablja za izračun stopnje dampinga.
The definitive dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, are:
Dokončne stopnje dampinga, izražene kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na mejah Skupnosti, so:
Residual dumping margin: 15,9 %
preostala stopnja dampinga: 15,9 %
The two cooperating exporting producers made submissions following the imposition of provisional measures in which they claimed that they should not have been regarded as two separate albeit related parties but rather, in view of their relationship as a unique exporting producer and that consequently, only one dumping calculation should be made.
Oba sodelujoča proizvajalca-izvoznika sta po uvedbi začasnih ukrepov predložila stališča, kjer sta trdila, da ju ne bi smeli obravnavati kot dve ločeni, čeprav povezani stranki, temveč, na podlagi njunega odnosa, kot enotnega proizvajalca-izvoznika in da je posledično potrebno narediti samo en dampinški izračun.
This request was thoroughly analysed on the basis of the arguments developed by these exporting producers subsequent to the provisional findings.
Ta zahteva je bila podrobno proučena na podlagi argumentov, ki sta jih razvila ta dva proizvajalca-izvoznika po začasnih ugotovitvah.
It was found that the particular characteristics of the relationship between the companies concerned and the very close interlinks in their operation was such as to distinguish their position from the typical situation of two related companies.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so posebne značilnosti odnosa med zadevnima podjetjema in zelo tesne povezave med njunim delovanjem takšne, da jih razlikuje od tipične situacije dveh povezanih podjetij.
In particular, account was taken of the very significant financial and other links between the two exporting producers, the fact that they sell the product concerned under the same brand name, the fact that they share the same administrative premises and organisation as well as marketing division.
Upoštevane so bile zlasti znatne finančne povezave med obema proizvajalcema-izvoznikoma, dejstvo, da zadevni izdelek prodajata pod isto blagovno znamko, dejstvo, da imata skupne upravne prostore in organizacijo, kot tudi oddelek za trženje.
Moreover, they share largely the same staff members and Directors and have a common production plan.
Poleg tega imata v glavnem skupne uslužbence in direktorje ter skupni načrt proizvodnje.
The combination of all these elements is deemed sufficient to consider that under these particular circumstances the situation of the two exporting producers warrants that they be treated as a unique exporting producer in the Pakistani PET business rather than as two separate companies.
Kombinacija vseh teh elementov se smatra kot zadostna, da se pod temi posebnimi okoliščinami oba proizvajalca-izvoznika obravnava kot enoten proizvajalec-izvoznik v pakistanski PET dejavnosti, namesto kot dve ločeni podjetji.
Therefore, in view of all these elements, it was considered that the claim should be accepted.
Zaradi vseh teh elementov je bilo sprejeto stališče, da je zahteva upravičena.
In view of the above, the general methodology explained in recitals 20 to 34 of the provisional Regulation was applied for the unique exporting producer and the methodology explained in recitals 43 and 44 of the provisional Regulation has been revised.
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je bila splošna metodologija, opisana v uvodnih izjavah 20 do 34 začasne uredbe, uporabljena za enotnega proizvajalca-izvoznika, metodologija, opisana v uvodnih izjavah 43 in 44 začasne uredbe, pa je bila revidirana.
The Commission first established, for the unique exporting producer, whether its total domestic sales of the product concerned were representative in comparison with its total export sales to the Community.
Komisija je za enotnega proizvajalca-izvoznika najprej ugotovila, ali je njegova skupna domača prodaja zadevnega izdelka reprezentativna v primerjavi z njegovo skupno izvozno prodajo v Skupnost.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, domestic sales were considered representative when the total domestic sales volume of each exporting producer was at least 5 % of its total export sales volume to the Community.
Skladno s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe se domača prodaja smatra za reprezentativno, če je celotni domači obseg prodaje vsakega proizvajalca-izvoznika vsaj 5 % njegovega celotnega izvoznega prodajnega obsega v Skupnosti.
The Commission subsequently identified those types of PET, sold domestically by the unique exporting producer that had overall representative domestic sales and that were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community.
Nadalje je Komisija identificirala tiste vrste PET-a, ki jih doma prodaja enotni proizvajalec-izvoznik, ki je imel skupno reprezentativno domačo prodajo, in ki so identične ali neposredno primerljive z vrstami, ki se prodajajo za izvoz v Skupnost.
For each type sold by the unique exporting producer on its domestic market and found to be directly comparable to the type of PET sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Za vsako vrsto, ki jo enotni proizvajalec-izvoznik prodaja na domačem trgu, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je neposredno primerljiva z vrsto PET-a, ki se prodaja za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je domača prodaja dovolj reprezentativna za potrebe člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular type of PET were considered sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable PET type exported to the Community.
Domača prodaja posamezne vrste PET-a se je zdela dovolj reprezentativna, če je skupni domači obseg prodaje te vrste PET-a v OP predstavljal 5 % ali več skupnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste PET-a izvoženega v Skupnost.
An examination was also made as to whether the domestic sales of each type of PET could be regarded as having been made in the ordinary course of trade, by establishing the proportion of profitable sales to independent customers of the PET type in question, in accordance with recitals 23 and 24 of the provisional Regulation.
Narejena je bila tudi presoja, ali je mogoče za domačo prodajo vsake vrste PET-a smatrati, da je bila narejena v običajnem poteku trgovanja, tako da je bil ugotovljen delež dobičkonosnih prodaj neodvisnim strankam obravnavane vrste PET-a, skladno z uvodnimi izjavami 23 in 24 začasne uredbe.
Wherever domestic prices of a particular type sold by the unique exporting producer could not be used, constructed normal value had to be used.
Kjer ni bilo mogoče uporabiti domačih cen za posamezno vrsto, ki jo prodaja enotni proizvajalec-izvoznik, je morala biti uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost.
Consequently, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed by adding to the weighted average manufacturing costs of the exported types, adjusted where necessary, a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) and a reasonable margin of profit.
Posledično, skladno s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, je bila normalna vrednost konstruirana tako, da so bili, po potrebi prilagojenemu tehtanemu povprečju proizvodnih stroškov izvoznih vrst, prišteti razumni zneski za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (v nadaljnjem besedilu „PSA stroški“) ter za razumno stopnjo dobička.
To this end, the Commission examined whether the SG&A incurred and the profit realised by the unique exporting producer on the domestic market constituted reliable data.
V ta namen je Komisija presodila, ali so podatki o PSA stroških in dobičku enotnega proizvajalca-izvoznika na domačem trgu zanesljivi.
Actual domestic SG&A expenses were considered reliable when the total domestic sales volume of the unique exporting producer could be regarded as representative when compared to the volume of export sales to the Community.
Dejanski domači PSA stroški so bili ugotovljeni kot zanesljivi, če je bil skupni obseg domače prodaje enotnega proizvajalca–izvoznika reprezentativni v primerjavi z obsegom izvozne prodaje v Skupnost.
The domestic profit margin was determined on the basis of domestic sales of those types which were sold in the ordinary course of trade.
Domača stopnja dobička je bila ugotovljena na podlagi domače prodaje tistih vrst, ki so bile prodane v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
For this purpose, the methodology set out in recital 23 of the provisional Regulation was applied.
V ta namen je bila uporabljena metodologija iz uvodne izjave 23 začasne uredbe.
For two types of PET exported by the unique exporting producer, the Commission could establish normal value on the basis of the prices paid or payable in the ordinary course of trade by independent customers on the domestic market, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Za dve vrsti PET-a, ki ga izvaža enotni proizvajalec-izvoznik, je Komisija lahko določila normalno vrednost na podlagi plačanih in plačljivih cen v običajnem poteku trgovanja z neodvisnimi strankami na domačem trgu, skladno s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe.
For the three PET types whose domestic sales were found to be not representative, constructed normal value was used, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.
Za tri vrste PET-a, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da domača prodaja ni reprezentativna, je bila uporabljena konstruirana normalna vrednost, skladno s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe.
All sales of the product concerned made by the unique exporting producer on the Community market were made to independent customers in the Community.
Vsa prodaja zadevnega izdelka enotnega proizvajalca-izvoznika na trgu Skupnosti je bila neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
Consequently, the export price was established according to Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable.
Posledično je bila izvozna cena določena skladno s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, na podlagi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih cen.
In order to ensure a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which were claimed and demonstrated to affect prices and price comparability.
Da bi zagotovili pravično primerjavo, so bile skladno s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevane razlike med faktorji, ki so dokazano vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen.
On this basis, allowances for differences in transport, insurance, handling charges, commissions, credit and other factors have been granted.
Na tej podlagi so bile odobrene olajšave za razlike v stroških prevoza, zavarovanja in ravnanja, provizijah, kreditih in drugih faktorjih.
As provided by Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the weighted average normal value of each type of the product concerned exported to the Community by the unique exporting producer was compared to the weighted average export price of each corresponding type of the product concerned.
Kot predpisuje člen 2(11) osnovne uredbe, je bila tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost za vsako vrsto zadevnega izdelka, ki ga je v Skupnost izvozil enotni proizvajalec-izvoznik, primerjana s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno za vsako ustrezno vrsto zadevnega izdelka.
The dumping margin, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, was reviewed in the light of the issues outlined above, and was found to be 1,6 % i.e. below the de minimis threshold as defined in Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Stopnja dampinga, izražena kot odstotek uvozne cene CIF na mejah Skupnosti, je bila v luči zgoraj opisanih vprašanj pregledana in njena vrednost postavljena na 1,6 %, tj. pod de minimis pragom, kot je določen v členu 9(3) osnovne uredbe.
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC)
LJUDSKA REPUBLIKA KITAJSKA („LRK“)
Market economy treatment (MET)
Tržno gospodarska obravnava („TGO“)
The four companies which were granted neither MET nor individual treatment (IT) made submissions where they reiterated the claims mentioned in recitals 57 to 73 of the provisional Regulation.
Štiri podjetja, ki jim nista bili odobreni ne TGO ne individualna obravnava („IO“), so predložila stališča, kjer so ponovila trditve, omenjene v uvodnih izjavah 57 do 73 začasne uredbe.
However, none of them provided evidences which would lead to contradict the conclusions drawn in the provisional Regulation.
Vendar nobeno od njih ni predložilo dokazov, ki bi vodila v nasprotne zaključke, kot so ta v začasni uredbi.
Therefore, the decision not to grant MET to these four cooperating exporting producers and the findings set out in the abovementioned recitals of the provisional Regulation are confirmed.
Zato se potrdijo odločitev, da se tem štirim sodelujočim proizvajalcem-izvoznikom ne odobri TGO, in ugotovitve v zgoraj omenjenih uvodnih izjavah začasne uredbe.
Following comments received, it was not possible to calculate an individual margin for one of the companies which was granted only IT, as its exports of the product concerned to the EU during the IP could not be considered to have been in commercially significant quantities.
Po prejemu pripomb ni bilo mogoče izračunati individualne stopnje za eno od podjetij, ki mu je bila odobrena le IO, saj se njegov izvoz zadevnega izdelka v EU v času OP ni štel za trgovinsko znatne količine.
The other company which was granted only IT and whose claim for MET was rejected on the basis of non-compliance with criterion 2 specified in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation, also made submissions in which it repeated its claim for MET.
Drugo podjetje, ki mu je bila odobrena IO in katerega zahteva za TGO je bila zavrnjena na podlagi neizpolnjevanja kriterija 2 iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe, je tudi predložilo stališča, v katerih je ponovno zahteval odobritev TGO.
However, no further evidence was submitted that was of a nature to contradict the conclusions drawn in the provisional Regulation.
Vendar ni bilo predloženih dodatnih dokazov takšne narave, ki bi nasprotovali zaključkom iz začasne uredbe.
Consequently, the conclusion drawn in recital 68 of the provisional Regulation is confirmed for this company.
Posledično se za to podjetje potrdi zaključek iz uvodne izjave 68 začasne uredbe.
Individual treatment
Individualna obravnava
One of the four companies which were neither granted MET nor IT claimed that nevertheless, all conditions for the granting of IT were met.
Eno od štirih podjetij, ki jim nista bila odobreni ne TGO ne IO, je kljub temu trdilo, da so bili izpolnjeni vsi pogoji za odobritev IO.
However, given that no new evidence was provided, the conclusions drawn in recital 76 of the provisional Regulation are confirmed and the claim is rejected.
Toda glede na to, da niso bili podani nobeni novi dokazi, se potrdi zaključek iz uvodne izjave 76 in zahteva se zavrne.
Normal Value
Normalna vrednost
Determination of normal value for all exporting producers not granted MET
Določitev normalne vrednosti za vse proizvajalce-izvoznike, ki jim ni odobrena TGO
Analogue country
Analogna država
The exporting producers have repeated their objection to the choice of the United States of America (USA) as the analogue country.
Proizvajalci-izvozniki so ponovili svoj ugovor na izbiro Združenih držav Amerike („ZDA“) kot analogne države.
The main reasons given were the difference in cultural and economic development, the difference in costs and the fact that countries such as Pakistan or the Republic of South Korea (Korea) would be much more appropriate than the USA.
Njihovi glavni argumenti so bili razlika v kulturnem in gospodarskem razvoju, razlike v stroških in dejstvo, da bi bili državi kot sta Pakistan in Republika Južna Koreja („Koreja“) mnogo bolj primerni kot ZDA.
First of all, differences in terms of cultural development are considered irrelevant for the choice of an analogue country, because an analogue country is taken to reflect market economy conditions and not comparable cultural development levels.
Kot prvo, razlike v kulturnem razvoju se pri izboru analogne države smatrajo za nepomembne, saj naj bi analogna država odsevala razmere tržnega gospodarstva, in ne primerljivih stopenj kulturnega razvoja.
As regards the use of a country with different economic development, it should be mentioned that, by definition, a non-market-economy country or an economy in transition does not have the same economic characteristics as a market-economy country.
Glede uporabe države z drugačnim gospodarskim razvojem je treba omeniti, da v skladu z opredelitvijo država z netržnim gospodarstvom ali država v prehodu nima enakih gospodarskih značilnosti kot država s tržnim gospodarstvom.
It is not unusual that such difference in economic development exists between an analogue country and a non-market-economy country or an economy in transition.
Takšna razlika v gospodarskem razvoju med analogno državo in državo z netržnim gospodarstvom ali državo v prehodu ni nenavadna.
This, however, does not prevent the USA to be chosen as analogue country as long as it is deemed more appropriate.
To pa ne preprečuje izbora ZDA kot analogne države, dokler se smatra za bolj primerno.
Regarding the difference in costs, it is recalled that no significant difference was found in the prices paid by producers in the USA and the PRC for the main raw material (PTA) which represents the most significant part of the cost of production of PET.
Glede razlike v stroških opozarjamo, da ni bila ugotovljena nobena pomembna razlika med cenami, ki jih proizvajalci v ZDA in LRK plačujejo za glavno surovino (PTA), ki predstavlja najpomembnejši del stroškov proizvodnje PET-a.
Some exporting producers stressed the fact that while labour costs are higher in the USA than in the PRC, labour costs in Pakistan and Korea are more comparable to Chinese labour costs.
Nekateri proizvajalci-izvozniki so poudarili dejstvo, da so stroški dela v ZDA mnogo višji kot v LRK, medtem ko so stroški dela v Pakistanu in Koreji bolj primerljivi s kitajskimi stroški dela.
In these circumstances, these producers considered that Pakistan or Korea would be a more appropriate analogue country than the USA.
V teh okoliščinah so ti proizvajalci menili, da bi bila Pakistan ali Koreja bolj primerni analogni državi kot ZDA.
As mentioned in recital 43, a country with a different level of economic development may be chosen as analogue country for a non-market-economy country or an economy in transition.
Kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi 43 zgoraj, je mogoče državi z netržnim gospodarstvom ali državi v prehodu za analogno državo izbrati državo z drugačno stopnjo gospodarskega razvoja.
Similarly, labour costs which reflect the state of economic development of a country are not in isolation considered as a relevant criterion.
Na podoben način se stroški dela, ki odražajo stanje gospodarskega razvoja države, sami po sebi ne smatrajo za ustrezen kriterij.