natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Formulated glyphosate is generally in a liquid form consisting of a mixture of glyphosate salt, water and other chemicals, such as surfactants and additives which enable the herbicide to be absorbed into the plants and improve effectiveness.
Formulirani glifosat je ponavadi v tekoči obliki. Tekočina je mešanica glifosatne soli, vode in drugih kemičnih spojin, kot na primer površinsko aktivnih snovi in aditivov, ki omogočajo herbicidu, da ga rastline vsrkajo in mu dajejo večjo učinkovitost.
The typical standard form of formulated glyphosate contains 360 grams/litre of glyphosate.
Tipična standardna oblika formuliranega glifosata vsebuje 360 gramov glifosata na liter.
In order to reduce the costs of transportation, importers normally purchase glyphosate in a concentrated form (usually acid or wet cake, but also salt) and further process (formulate) it by adding water and other chemicals in order to obtain formulated glyphosate, which is the only form that can be used as an end-product, i.e. as a non-selective herbicide.
Da bi znižali stroške prevoza, kupujejo uvozniki glifosat ponavadi v koncentrirani obliki (običajno v obliki kisline ali mokrega kolača, pa tudi soli) in ga nadalje procesirajo (formulirajo) z dodajanjem vode in drugih kemičnih spojin, da bi dobili formulirani glifosat. To je edina oblika, ki se lahko uporabi kot končni izdelek, tj. kot neselektivni herbicid.
In view of this, importers and formulators were treated as one group (importers/formulators) for the purposes of the investigation.
Zaradi tega se je uvoznike in formulatorje v preiskavi obravnavalo kot eno skupino („uvozniki/formulatorji“).
Like product
Podoben izdelek
Glyphosate produced and sold in the Community by the Community producers requesting the expiry review and glyphosate produced in the PRC and sold in the Community by the Chinese exporting producers share the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics as well as the same uses and are therefore considered to be like products, within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Glifosat, ki ga v Skupnosti proizvajajo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, ki so zahtevali pregled zaradi izteka ukrepa, in glifosat, ki ga proizvajajo v LRK in prodajajo v Skupnosti kitajski proizvajalci - izvozniki, imata enake osnovne fizične, tehnične in kemične lastnosti, pa tudi enako uporabo, zato se ju obravnava kot podobna izdelka po definiciji iz člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
It was also established that glyphosate produced and sold domestically in the market economy third country (the analogue country), i.e. Brazil, had the same basic physical, technical and chemical characteristics as well as the same uses as glyphosate produced in the PRC and exported to the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo tudi, da ima glifosat, ki se ga proizvaja in prodaja na domačem trgu v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom („analogna država“), tj. Braziliji, enake osnovne fizične, tehnične in kemične lastnosti, pa tudi enako uporabo kot glifosat, ki se ga proizvaja v LRK in izvaža v Skupnost.
Therefore, they were considered to be like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato se ju obravnava kot podobna izdelka po definiciji iz člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RECURRENCE OF DUMPING
VERJETNOST NADALJEVANJA ALI PONOVITVE DAMPINGA
Two Chinese companies cooperated in the investigations.
V preiskavah sta sodelovali dve kitajski podjetji.
However, only one of them (Xinanchem) had exports of the product concerned to the Community during the IP (hereafter the Chinese exporting producer).
Vendar pa je v OP zadevni izdelek v Skupnost izvažalo samo eno od njiju (Xinanchem, v nadaljevanju „kitajski proizvajalec – izvoznik“).
Consequently, the cooperation of the other company (Zhenjiang) was limited to the expiry review investigation.
Posledično je bilo sodelovanje drugega podjetja (Zhenjiang) omejeno na preiskavo o pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa.
The total quantity of glyphosate originating in the PRC imported during the IP is less than 50 % of the quantity imported during the investigation period of the original investigation (12 months to end August 1995).
Skupna količina glifosata s poreklom iz LRK, uvožena v OP, je bila manjša kot 50 % količine, ki je bila uvožena v preiskovalnem obdobju prvotne preiskave (12 mesecev do konca avgusta 1995).
Since consumption was increasing, the market share held by imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC decreased more significantly over the same period.
Ker je poraba naraščala, se je tržni delež uvoza zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz LRK v istem obdobju občutneje znižal.
From 11 % during the investigation period of the original investigation, it decreased to below 3 % at the start of the analysis period and to less than 2 % in 2001, but subsequently increased during the IP while still remaining below 2 %.
Z 11 % v preiskovalnem obdobju prvotne preiskave se je znižal na manj kot 3 % na začetku analiznega obdobja in na manj kot 2 % leta 2001. Vendar pa se je nato v OP povišal, a je bil še vedno nižji od 2 %.
Since the PRC is considered to be an economy in transition, the Commission had to determine in this case the normal value on the basis of data obtained from producers in a market economy third country, in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation.
Ker se LRK obravnava kot država z gospodarstvom v prehodu, je morala Komisija v tem primeru ugotoviti normalno vrednost na podlagi podatkov proizvajalcev v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe.
For this purpose, the Commission suggested Brazil in the Notice of initiation which was also the analogue country used in the investigation leading to the imposition of the measures.
V ta namen je Komisija v Obvestilu o začetku predlagala Brazilijo, ki je bila analogna država tudi v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe ukrepov.
All interested parties were given the opportunity to comment on the choice of analogue country envisaged.
Vse zainteresirane stranke so imele priložnost podati mnenje o izbiri predvidene analogne države.
The Chinese exporting producer argued that a country with a more appropriate level of economic development to the PRC should be used and that an analogue country situated in Asia would offer a better point of comparison.
Kitajski proizvajalec – izvoznik je trdil, da bi bilo treba uporabiti državo z bolj primerljivo stopnjo gospodarskega razvoja LRK in da bi analogna država iz Azije nudila boljšo primerjavo.
It is to be noted that the same level of economic development is, as such, not relevant for the purpose of establishing the normal value.
Treba je poudariti, da enaka stopnja gospodarskega razvoja kot taka ni pomembna pri ugotavljanju normalne vrednosti.
Even though no substantiated proposals for an analogue country other than Brazil were made, the Commission inquired from Taiwanese and Malaysian known producers of the product concerned about their willingness to provide the necessary information.
Čeprav ni bilo utemeljenih predlogov za kako drugo analogno državo kot Brazilijo, je Komisija povprašala tajvanske in malezijske znane proizvajalce zadevnega izdelka o njihovi pripravljenosti posredovati potrebne informacije.
However, these producers in Taiwan and Malaysia submitted that both of these markets were strongly influenced by low-priced imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC and that the prices in these countries were not representative.
Vendar pa so ti proizvajalci iz Tajvana in Malezije podali mnenje, da čutita oba trga močan vpliv poceni uvoza glifosata s poreklom iz LRK in da cene v teh dveh državah niso reprezentativne.
One producer in Taiwan considered that other countries, such as Brazil, were more suitable for this purpose.
En proizvajalec iz Tajvana je menil, da so druge države, na primer Brazilija, bolj primerne za ta namen.
As a result no further cooperation of these producers was achieved.
Posledično nadaljnjega sodelovanja s temi proizvajalci ni bilo.
The Chinese exporting producer in the PRC submitted also that information concerning Brazil would be provided by an affiliated related company of a member of the applicant and that the Commission should rather use independent and properly verifiable information for the purpose of establishing normal value.
Kitajski proizvajalec – izvoznik v LRK je podal tudi trditev, da bi podatke o Braziliji podajalo povezano podjetje iz združenja vlagatelja in da bi morala Komisija pri ugotavljanju normalne vrednosti raje uporabiti neodvisne in res preverljive informacije.
However, it was considered that the fact that one company in the proposed analogue country is a related company of a member of the applicant did not preclude that the information obtained could be reliable and verifiable.
Vendar pa je bilo upoštevano, da dejstvo, da je eno podjetje v predlagani analogni državi povezano s podjetjem iz združenja vlagatelja, ne izključuje verodostojnosti in preverljivosti podanih informacij.
Special attention was paid to the necessity to eliminate any possible effects of the relationship in determining the normal value.
Posebej je bila poudarjena potreba po izločitvi vseh možnih učinkov tega razmerja pri ugotavljanju normalne vrednosti.
Since Brazil was considered a reasonable choice, with producers willing to cooperate and using a comparable production process, and particularly taking into account that Brazil was the analogue country used in the investigation leading to the imposition of the measures, Brazil was chosen as the analogue country.
Ker se je ugotovilo, da je Brazilija razumna izbira, kjer so proizvajalci voljni sodelovati in uporabljajo primerljiv proizvodni postopek, in še posebej ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je bila Brazilija analogna država v preiskavi, ki je pripeljala do uvedbe ukrepov, je bila Brazilija izbrana za analogno državo.
The Commission sought to obtain the necessary information from the two known producers in the country, i.e. Monsanto do Brasil (Mobras) and Nortox.
Komisija je skušala pridobiti potrebne informacije od dveh znanih proizvajalcev v državi, tj. od podjetij Monsanto do Brasil („Mobras“) in Nortox.
The Commission was ultimately able to obtain information only from Mobras, which is a company related to a member of the applicant.
Na koncu je Komisija pridobila informacije le od podjetja Mobras, ki je podjetje, povezano s podjetjem iz združenja vlagatelja.
It was determined that the domestic sales of this company were representative in relation to the volume of the product concerned sold by the Chinese exporting producer to the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je domača prodaja tega podjetja reprezentativna v razmerju do obsega, v katerem je kitajski proizvajalec – izvoznik prodal zadevni izdelek v Skupnost.
Normal value was calculated for all forms of glyphosate produced and sold in Brazil, i.e. glyphosate acid and different formulations based on their concentration.
Normalna vrednost je bila izračunana za vse oblike glifosata, ki se proizvaja in prodaja v Braziliji, tj. za glifosatno kislino in formulacije različnih koncentracij.
It was established that the product types sold on the domestic market of Brazil were not comparable to the product types sold by the said exporting producer to the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da tipi izdelkov v prodaji na domačem brazilskem trgu niso bili primerljivi s tipi izdelkov, ki jih je omenjeni proizvajalec – izvoznik prodajal v Skupnosti.
Therefore, in accordance with Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, normal value was constructed on the basis of the manufacturing costs plus a reasonable amount for selling, general and administrative costs (SG&A) and for profit.
Zato je bila v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe normalna vrednost konstruirana na podlagi proizvodnih stroškov ter razumnih zneskov za prodajne, splošne in administrativne stroške (PSA stroški) in za dobiček.
The SG&A costs and profit were determined on the basis of Mobras' domestic sales of the like product.
PSA stroške in dobiček se je ugotovilo na osnovi domače prodaje podobnega izdelka podjetja Mobras.
In this regard it is noted that Mobras sourced the major part of its raw materials for glyphosate production from a related company in Brazil.
Pri tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Mobras večino surovin za proizvodnjo glifosata nabavil pri povezanem podjetju v Braziliji.
The profit level of the related company was adjusted to a lower level, when determining the cost of acquisition of raw material used in the calculation of the manufacturing costs.
Raven dobička povezanega podjetja je bila tako pri ugotavljanju stroškov nabave surovin za izračun proizvodnih stroškov prilagojena na nižjo raven.
The amounts for SG&A and for profits were based on actual data pertaining to sales, in the ordinary course of trade, of glyphosate, by Mobras.
Vsote za PSA stroške in za dobiček so temeljile na dejanskih podatkih o prodaji glifosata podjetja Mobras v okviru običajnega poteka trgovanja.
All export sales of the Chinese exporting producer to the Community were made directly to independent customers in the Community and the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices paid or payable.
Vsa izvozna prodaja kitajskega proizvajalca – izvoznika v Skupnost je potekala neposredno neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti, izvozna cena pa je bila postavljena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na podlagi plačanih ali plačljivih cen.
The comparison of the data concerning exports to the Community provided by the Chinese exporting producer and the total volume of imports originating in the PRC as determined in recital 58 below, indicated that the level of cooperation was low, since these exports represented less than 26 % of total Community imports from the PRC during the IP.
Primerjava podatkov o izvozu v Skupnost kitajskega proizvajalca – izvoznika in skupnega obsega uvoza s poreklom iz LRK, kot ugotavlja uvodna izjava (58) spodaj, je pokazala, da je bila raven sodelovanja nizka, ker je ta izvoz predstavljal manj kot 26 % skupnega uvoza Skupnosti iz LRK v OP.
For the purposes of a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences which were claimed and demonstrated to affect price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Da bi bila primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno poštena, so bile omogočene prilagoditve za razlike, ki so bile izpostavljene in za katere se je izkazalo, da vplivajo na primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
On this basis, adjustments were made where appropriate with regard to indirect taxes, discounts, transport, insurance, handling, loading and ancillary costs, packing, credit and commissions.
Na tej podlagi so bile izvedene primerne prilagoditve glede na neposredne dajatve, popuste, prevoz, zavarovanje, rokovanje, natovarjanje in druge tozadevne stroške, embaliranje, posojila in provizije.
The adjustments in the export price in respect of inland freight in the exporting country, packing costs and credit costs were made based on the costs established in the analogue country.
Prilagoditve izvozne cene glede na notranje tovorjenje v izvozni državi, stroške embaliranja in posojil so bile vzpostavljene na podlagi stroškov, ki so bili ugotovljeni v analogni državi.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Ta primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila izvedena na osnovi cene franko tovarna.
Dumping margins
Stopnje dampinga
A comparison of the normal value and the export price of the Chinese exporting producer showed a dumping margin of 28,7 % during the IP.
Primerjava normalne vrednosti in izvozne cene kitajskega proizvajalca – izvoznika je pokazala stopnjo dampinga 28,7 % v OP.
In the absence of individual treatment being granted to this exporting producer, an overall dumping margin was calculated for the whole of the PRC.
Ker temu proizvajalcu – izvozniku individualna obravnava ni bila odobrena, je bila izračunana splošna stopnja dampinga za celo LRK.
Since, as described in recital 33, the level of cooperation was low, for the export volumes of non-cooperating Chinese exporting producers, the level of dumping was determined on the basis of the highest margin established for a representative type of the product concerned, of the cooperating exporting producer.
Ker je bila raven sodelovanja nizka, kot je opisano v uvodni izjavi (33), je bila za obseg izvoza nesodelujočih kitajskih proizvajalcev – izvoznikov raven dampinga ugotovljena na podlagi najvišje ugotovljene ravni za reprezentativni tip zadevnega izdelka sodelujočega proizvajalca – izvoznika.
This approach was deemed appropriate since no indication was found that any of the non-cooperating producers dumped the product at a lower level than that of the cooperating exporter.
Ta pristop se je zdel primeren, ker ni bilo nobenega znaka, da bi kateri koli od nesodelujočih proizvajalcev prodajal izdelek po nižji ravni dampinga v primerjavi s sodelujočim proizvajalcem.
Therefore, a dumping margin of 30,2 % was attributed to all non-cooperating exporting producers and the cooperating exporting producer which had no exports to the Community during the IP.
Zato je bila dodeljena stopnja dampinga 30,2 % vsem nesodelujočim proizvajalcem - izvoznikom in sodelujočemu proizvajalcu – izvozniku, ki v OP ni izvažal v Skupnost.
Finally, a country-wide average dumping margin was calculated using as a weighing factor, the cif value of each group of exporters, i.e. cooperators and non-cooperators.
Na koncu je bila izračunana povprečna stopnja dampinga na ravni države, pri kateri se je kot ponder uporabilo vrednost CIF vsake skupine izvoznikov, tako sodelujočih kot nesodelujočih.
The established country-wide dumping margin was 29,9 %.
Postavljena stopnja dampinga na ravni države je bila 29,9 %.
The country wide dumping margin established in the interim review investigation was lower than the dumping margin established in the original investigation and, furthermore, it was lower than the dumping margin established in the anti-absorption investigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Postavljena stopnja dampinga na ravni države v preiskavi o vmesnem pregledu je bila nižja kot postavljena stopnja dampinga iz prvotne preiskave, poleg tega pa je bila nižja od postavljene stopnje dampinga v protiabsorpcijski preiskavi v skladu s členom 12 osnovne uredbe.
It is to be recalled that there has been a considerable reduction in the normal value of the product concerned since the IP of the original investigation.
Treba je spomniti, da je prišlo od OP prvotne preiskave do znatnega znižanja normalne vrednosti zadevnega izdelka.
Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that it is not likely that a higher dumping margin would recur if the measures were amended to reflect the dumping margin established in the interim review investigation.
Zato je smotrn zaključek, da ni verjetno, da bi se ponovila višja stopnja dampinga, če bi se ukrepe dopolnilo tako, da bi odražali stopnjo dampinga, ki je bila postavljena v preiskavi o vmesnem pregledu.
Development of imports should measures be repealed
Razvoj uvoza, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni
PRC export sales to other countries (volume and prices)
Izvozna prodaja LRK v druge države (obseg in cene)
It was found that glyphosate was sold to third countries at prices even lower than the dumped prices of the sales to the Community market as derived from the questionnaire responses and from Eurostat statistics.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da se glifosat prodaja v tretje države še po nižjih cenah, kot so dampinške cene prodaje na trgu Skupnosti, kar je razvidno iz odgovorov na vprašalnik in iz statistike Statističnega urada Evropskih skupnosti.
Moreover, as derived from the questionnaire responses the volumes of exports to third countries increased by more than 100 % since the imposition of the definitive measures.
Poleg tega je iz odgovorov na vprašalnik razvidno, da se je obseg izvoza v tretje države od uvedbe dokončnih ukrepov povečal za več kot 100 %.
Therefore, if the measures were lifted, the exporting producers in the PRC could also divert their existing exports to other markets to the Community market in significant quantities at dumped prices.
Zato bi lahko proizvajalci – izvozniki iz LRK v primeru odprave ukrepov precejšnje količine obstoječega izvoza z drugih trgov preusmerili na trg Skupnosti po dampinških cenah.
Information provided by the applicant showed that more than 80 % of all glyphosate production in the PRC is exported.
Informacije, ki jih je posredoval vlagatelj, so pokazale, da je več kot 80 % celotne proizvodnje glifosata v LRK izvoženih.
In respect of the two cooperating exporting producers, exports accounted for a major proportion of their total production of glyphosate.
Pri obeh sodelujočih proizvajalcih – izvoznikih je izvoz predstavljal večinski delež njune celotne proizvodnje glifosata.
Therefore, it was established that most of the glyphosate production in the PRC was directed to export markets.
Zato je bilo ugotovljeno, da je večina proizvodnje glifosata v LRK namenjena na izvozne trge.
Unused production capacities in the PRC
Neizrabljene proizvodne zmogljivosti v LRK
The two cooperating companies declared that their production capacity during the IP was around 34000 tonnes of glyphosate expressed in 95 % acid equivalents.
Obe sodelujoči podjetji sta prijavili, da so bile njune proizvodne zmogljivosti v OP okrog 34000 ton glifosata v obliki, enakovredni 95-odstotni kislini.
Since 1999 these two companies have increased their production capacity by more than 92 % according to their questionnaire responses.
Od leta 1999 sta ti dve podjetji, glede na njune odgovore na vprašalnik, proizvodne zmogljivosti zvišali za več kot 92 %.
Information provided by the applicant estimated that the total glyphosate production capacity in the PRC amounted to 79500 tonnes.
Informacije, ki jih je posredoval vlagatelj, so vsebovale oceno, da so bile skupne zmogljivosti proizvodnje glifosata v LRK 79500 ton.
Both cooperating companies were operating close to full capacity levels.
Obe sodelujoči podjetji sta delovali s skoraj polno zmogljivostjo.
However, the information provided by the applicant showed that the average capacity utilisation rate of all producers in the PRC was around 83 % in 2001 i.e. leaving a spare capacity of about 13500 tonnes.
Vendar pa so informacije, ki jih je posredoval vlagatelj, pokazale, da je bila povprečna stopnja izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti vseh proizvajalcev v LRK leta 2001 okrog 83-odstotna, kar je pustilo približno 13500 ton prostih zmogljivosti.
Based on the above, it was concluded that the exporting producers in the PRC have available capacity to increase their exports to the Community market should the measures be repealed.
Glede na zgoraj omenjeno je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo proizvajalci – izvozniki v LRK na voljo zmogljivosti za povečanje izvoza na trg Skupnosti, če bi bili ukrepi razveljavljeni.
Circumvention/absorption practices in the past
Izogibanje/absorpcijske prakse v preteklosti
As indicated in recital 1, following the imposition of definitive duties in February 1998, two other investigations were conducted pursuant to Article 12 and Article 13 of the basic Regulation.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (1), sta bili po uvedbi dokončnih dajatev februarja 1998 izvedeni še dve preiskavi v skladu s členom 12 in s členom 13 osnovne uredbe. Ugotovitve teh preiskav so bile, da izvozniki iz LRK ne morejo tekmovati na trgu Skupnosti brez dampinških cen.