natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It may, in certain cases determined by its rules of procedure, sit in full court or in a chamber of five judges or of a single judge.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko v določenih primerih, ki jih ureja njegov poslovnik, odloča na občni seji, v senatu petih sodnikov ali pa odloča sodnik posameznik.
The President of the Civil Service Tribunal shall preside over the full court and the chamber of five judges.
Predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence predseduje občni seji in senatu petih sodnikov.
The Presidents of the chambers of three judges shall be designated as provided in paragraph 1.
Predsedniki senatov treh sodnikov se imenujejo, kot določa odstavek 1.
If the President of the Civil Service Tribunal is assigned to a chamber of three judges, he shall preside over that chamber.
Če je predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence dodeljen senatu treh sodnikov, temu senatu predseduje.
The jurisdiction of and quorum for the full court as well as the composition of the chambers and the assignment of cases to them shall be governed by the rules of procedure.
Pristojnosti in sklepčnost občne seje ter sestavo senatov in dodelitev zadev senatom ureja poslovnik.
Articles 2 to 6, 14, 15, the first, second and fifth paragraphs of Article 17, and Article 18 of the Statute of the Court of Justice shall apply to the Civil Service Tribunal and its members.
Členi 2 do 6, 14, 15 ter prvi, drugi in peti odstavek člena 17 ter člen 18 Statuta Sodišča se uporabljajo za Sodišče za uslužbence in njegove člane.
The oath referred to in Article 2 of the Statute shall be taken before the Court of Justice, and the decisions referred to in Articles 3, 4 and 6 thereof shall be adopted by the Court of Justice after consulting the Civil Service Tribunal.
Prisega iz člena 2 Statuta se izreče pred Sodiščem in odločitve iz členov 3, 4 in 6 Sodišče sprejme po posvetovanju s Sodiščem za uslužbence.
The Civil Service Tribunal shall be supported by the departments of the Court of Justice and of the Court of First Instance.
Sodišču za uslužbence pomagajo službe Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje.
The President of the Court of Justice or, in appropriate cases, the President of the Court of First Instance, shall determine by common accord with the President of the Civil Service Tribunal the conditions under which officials and other servants attached to the Court of Justice or the Court of First Instance shall render their services to the Civil Service Tribunal to enable it to function.
Predsednik Sodišča ali, če je to primerno, predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje v medsebojnem soglasju s predsednikom Sodišča za uslužbence določita, na kakšen način uradniki in drugi uslužbenci Sodišča ali Sodišča prve stopnje opravljajo naloge za Sodišče za uslužbence, da bi tako zagotovili njegovo delovanje.
Certain officials or other servants shall be responsible to the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal under the authority of the President of that Tribunal.
Nekateri uradniki ali drugi uslužbenci so odgovorni sodnemu tajniku Sodišča za uslužbence, ki je podrejen predsedniku tega sodišča.
The Civil Service Tribunal shall appoint its Registrar and lay down the rules governing his service.
Sodišče za uslužbence imenuje sodnega tajnika in določi pravila, ki urejajo njegov položaj.
The fourth paragraph of Article 3 and Articles 10, 11 and 14 of the Statute of the Court of Justice shall apply to the Registrar of the Tribunal.
Za sodnega tajnika tega sodišča se uporabljajo četrti odstavek člena 3 ter členi 10, 11 in 14 Statuta Sodišča.
The procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal shall be governed by Title III of the Statute of the Court of Justice, with the exception of Articles 22 and 23.
Postopek pred Sodiščem za uslužbence ureja naslov III Statuta Sodišča, z izjemo členov 22 in 23 Statuta.
Such further and more detailed provisions as may be necessary shall be laid down in the rules of procedure.
V poslovniku tega sodišča se po potrebi določijo nadaljnje in podrobnejše določbe glede postopka.
The provisions concerning the Court of First Instance's language arrangements shall apply to the Civil Service Tribunal.
Ureditev vprašanja jezikov na Sodišču prve stopnje se uporablja tudi za Sodišče za uslužbence.
The written stage of the procedure shall comprise the presentation of the application and of the statement of defence, unless the Civil Service Tribunal decides that a second exchange of written pleadings is necessary.
Pisni del postopka obsega vložitev tožbe in odgovora na tožbo, razen če Sodišče za uslužbence ne odloči, da je potrebna druga izmenjava pisnih vlog.
Where there is such second exchange, the Civil Service Tribunal may, with the agreement of the parties, decide to proceed to judgment without an oral procedure.
Če je prišlo do druge izmenjave pisnih vlog, lahko Sodišče za uslužbence v soglasju s strankami odloči brez ustnega postopka.
At all stages of the procedure, including the time when the application is filed, the Civil Service Tribunal may examine the possibilities of an amicable settlement of the dispute and may try to facilitate such settlement.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko v vseh fazah postopka od predložitve vloge preučuje možnosti za mirno rešitev spora in si lahko prizadeva omogočiti takšno rešitev.
The Civil Service Tribunal shall rule on the costs of a case.
Sodišče za uslužbence odloči o stroških.
Subject to the specific provisions of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs should the court so decide.
Ob upoštevanju posebnih določb poslovnika se, če sodišče tako odloči, plačilo stroškov naloži neuspešni stranki.
Where an application or other procedural document addressed to the Civil Service Tribunal is lodged by mistake with the Registrar of the Court of Justice or Court of First Instance, it shall be transmitted immediately by that Registrar to the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal.
Če je vloga ali drug procesni dokument, naslovljen na Sodišče za uslužbence, pomotoma vložen pri sodnem tajniku Sodišča ali Sodišča prve stopnje, ga ta nemudoma pošlje sodnemu tajniku Sodišča za uslužbence.
Likewise, where an application or other procedural document addressed to the Court of Justice or to the Court of First Instance is lodged by mistake with the Registrar of the Civil Service Tribunal, it shall be transmitted immediately by that Registrar to the Registrar of the Court of Justice or Court of First Instance.
Prav tako, če je vloga ali drug procesni dokument, naslovljen na Sodišče ali Sodišče prve stopnje, pomotoma vložen pri sodnem tajniku Sodišča za uslužbence, ga ta nemudoma pošlje sodnemu tajniku Sodišča ali Sodišča prve stopnje.
Where the Civil Service Tribunal finds that it does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action in respect of which the Court of Justice or the Court of First Instance has jurisdiction, it shall refer that action to the Court of Justice or to the Court of First Instance.
Če Sodišče za uslužbence ugotovi, da ni pristojno za obravnavanje in odločanje o tožbi, za katero je pristojno Sodišče ali Sodišče prve stopnje, jo odstopi Sodišču oz. Sodišču prve stopnje.
Likewise, where the Court of Justice or the Court of First Instance finds that an action falls within the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal, the Court seised shall refer that action to the Civil Service Tribunal, whereupon that Tribunal may not decline jurisdiction.
Prav tako, če Sodišče ali Sodišče prve stopnje ugotovi, da je za tožbo pristojno Sodišče za uslužbence, jo odstopi Sodišču za uslužbence, to pa ne more odkloniti pristojnosti.
Where the Civil Service Tribunal and the Court of First Instance are seised of cases in which the same issue of interpretation is raised or the validity of the same act is called in question, the Civil Service Tribunal, after hearing the parties, may stay the proceedings until the judgment of the Court of First Instance has been delivered.
Če so Sodišču za uslužbence in Sodišču prve stopnje predložene zadeve, kjer se postavlja enako vprašanje razlage ali odloča o veljavnosti istega akta, lahko Sodišče za uslužbence po zaslišanju strank postopek prekine, dokler Sodišče prve stopnje ne izda sodbe.
Where the Civil Service Tribunal and the Court of First Instance are seised of cases in which the same relief is sought, the Civil Service Tribunal shall decline jurisdiction so that the Court of First Instance may act on those cases.
Če so Sodišču za uslužbence in Sodišču prve stopnje predložene zadeve, kjer je predmet enak, Sodišče za uslužbence odkloni pristojnost, da bi o teh zadevah lahko odločalo Sodišče prve stopnje.
An appeal may be brought before the Court of First Instance, within two months of notification of the decision appealed against, against final decisions of the Civil Service Tribunal and decisions of that Tribunal disposing of the substantive issues in part only or disposing of a procedural issue concerning a plea of lack of jurisdiction or inadmissibility.
Pri Sodišču prve stopnje se lahko vloži pritožba v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o odločbi, proti kateri je pritožba vložena, proti končnim odločbam Sodišča za uslužbence in delnim odločbam tega sodišča o vsebinskih vprašanjih ali odločbam o procesnih vprašanjih glede nepristojnosti ali nedopustnosti.
Such an appeal may be brought by any party which has been unsuccessful, in whole or in part, in its submissions.
Takšno pritožbo lahko vloži katera koli stranka, ki v celoti ali delno ni uspela s svojimi sklepnimi predlogi.
However, interveners other than the Member States and the institutions of the Communities may bring such an appeal only where the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal directly affects them.
Tisti, ki so se postopku pridružili, razen držav članic in institucij Skupnosti, pa lahko vložijo takšno pritožbo le, če jih odločba Sodišča za uslužbence neposredno prizadeva.
Any person whose application to intervene has been dismissed by the Civil Service Tribunal may appeal to the Court of First Instance within two weeks of notification of the decision dismissing the application.
Vsakdo, čigar vlogo za pridružitev postopku je Sodišče za uslužbence zavrnilo, se lahko v dveh tednih po uradnem obvestilu o odločbi o zavrnitvi vloge pritoži na Sodišče prve stopnje.
The parties to the proceedings may appeal to the Court of First Instance against any decision of the Civil Service Tribunal made pursuant to Article 242 or Article 243 or the fourth paragraph of Article 256 of the EC Treaty or Article 157 or Article 158 or the third paragraph of Article 164 of the EAEC Treaty within two months of its notification.
Stranke v postopku se lahko pritožijo na Sodišče prve stopnje glede vseh odločb Sodišča za uslužbence, sprejetih na podlagi člena 242 ali člena 243 ali četrtega odstavka člena 256 Pogodbe ES in člena 157 ali člena 158 ali tretjega odstavka člena 164 Pogodbe ESAE, v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o njih.
The President of the Court of First Instance may, by way of summary procedure, which may, insofar as necessary, differ from some of the rules contained in this Annex and which shall be laid down in the rules of procedure of the Court of First Instance, adjudicate upon appeals brought in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2.
O pritožbah iz odstavkov 1 in 2 tega člena lahko odloča predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje po skrajšanem postopku, ki po potrebi odstopa od nekaterih pravil iz te priloge in ki bo določen v poslovniku Sodišča prve stopnje.
An appeal to the Court of First Instance shall be limited to points of law.
Pritožba na Sodišče prve stopnje je omejena na pravna vprašanja.
It shall lie on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal, a breach of procedure before it which adversely affects the interests of the appellant as well as the infringement of Community law by the Tribunal.
Lahko se vloži zaradi nepristojnosti Sodišča za uslužbence, zaradi kršitve postopka pred tem sodiščem, ki škoduje interesom pritožnika, pa tudi zaradi kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti s strani Sodišča za uslužbence.
No appeal shall lie regarding only the amount of the costs or the party ordered to pay them.
Pritožba, ki se nanaša samo na stroške in njihovo višino, ni dopustna.
Without prejudice to Articles 242 and 243 of the EC Treaty or Articles 157 and 158 of the EAEC Treaty, an appeal before the Court of First Instance shall not have suspensory effect.
Brez poseganja v člena 242 in 243 Pogodbe ES in člena 157 in 158 Pogodbe ESAE pritožba na Sodišče prve stopnje nima odložilnega učinka.
Where an appeal is brought against a decision of the Civil Service Tribunal, the procedure before the Court of First Instance shall consist of a written part and an oral part.
Če je pritožba vložena proti odločbi Sodišča za uslužbence, ima postopek pred Sodiščem prve stopnje pisni in ustni del.
In accordance with conditions laid down in the rules of procedure, the Court of First Instance, having heard the parties, may dispense with the oral procedure.
Sodišče prve stopnje lahko v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, po zaslišanju strank odloči brez ustnega postopka.
If the appeal is well founded, the Court of First Instance shall quash the decision of the Civil Service Tribunal and itself give judgment in the matter.
Če je pritožba utemeljena, Sodišče prve stopnje razveljavi odločbo Sodišča za uslužbence in samo odloči o zadevi.
It shall refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal for judgment where the state of the proceedings does not permit a decision by the Court.
Zadevo vrne v razsojanje Sodišču za uslužbence, če o njej ni možno odločiti.
Where a case is referred back to the Civil Service Tribunal, the Tribunal shall be bound by the decision of the Court of First Instance on points of law.’
Če je zadeva vrnjena Sodišču za uslužbence, je to sodišče glede pravnih vprašanj vezano na odločbo Sodišča prve stopnje.“
Done at Brussels, 2 November 2004.
V Bruslju, 2. novembra 2004
adopting the list of other persons whom the Council intends to appoint as Members of the Commission of the European Communities, repealing and replacing Decision 2004/642/EC, Euratom
o sprejetju seznama drugih oseb, ki jih namerava Svet imenovati za člane Komisije Evropskih skupnosti, ki razveljavlja in nadomešča Sklep 2004/642/ES, Euratom
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 213(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 214(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter zlasti člena 213(1) in drugega pododstavka člena 214(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 126(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 127(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člena 126(1) in drugega pododstavka člena 127(2) Pogodbe,
A new Commission, consisting of one national of each Member State, must be appointed for the period from the date of its appointment to 31 October 2009.
Za obdobje od dneva imenovanja do 31. oktobra 2009 mora biti imenovana nova Komisija, ki jo sestavlja po en državljan iz vsake države članice.
On 29 June 2004 the Council, meeting in the composition of the Heads of State or Government, nominated Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO as the person it intends to appoint as President of the Commission [1].
Svet se je 29. junija 2004 sestal na ravni voditeljev držav ali vlad in predlagal g. Joséja Manuela DURÃA BARROSA za osebo, ki jo namerava imenovati za predsednika Komisije [1].
The European Parliament approved that nomination by its resolution of 22 July 2004.
Evropski parlament je z resolucijo z dne 22. julija 2004 ta predlog potrdil.
By Decision 2004/642/EC, Euratom [2], the Council adopted by common accord with the nominee for President of the Commission the list of other persons whom it intends to appoint as Members of the Commission.
Svet je s svojim Sklepom 2004/642/ES, Euratom [2] v medsebojnem soglasju s kandidatom za mesto predsednika Komisije sprejel seznam drugih oseb, ki jih namerava imenovati za člane Komisije.
By common accord with the nominee for President of the Commission, Decision 2004/642/EC, Euratom should be repealed before the list that it contains is submitted for a vote of approval by the European Parliament, and replaced by the present Decision.
V medsebojnem soglasju s kandidatom za mesto predsednika Komisije je treba Sklep 2004/642/ES, Euratom razveljaviti, preden je seznam iz tega sklepa predložen Evropskemu parlamentu v potrditev, in ga nadomestiti s tem sklepom.
The following are hereby nominated by common accord with Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, nominee for President of the Commission, as the persons whom the Council intends to appoint as Members of the Commission of the European Communities for the period from the date of appointment of the new Commission to 31 October 2009:
V medsebojnem soglasju z g. Joséjem Manuelom DURÃOM BARROSOM, kandidatom za mesto predsednika Komisije, Svet predlaga naslednje osebe, ki jih namerava imenovati za člane Komisije Evropskih skupnosti za obdobje od datuma imenovanja nove Komisije do 31. oktobra 2009:
Mr Franco FRATTINI
gospod Franco FRATTINI
Mr Andris PIEBALGS
gospod Andris PIEBALGS
Decision 2004/642/EC, Euratom is hereby repealed.
Sklep 2004/642/ES, Euratom se razveljavi.
OJ L 294, 17.9.2004, p. 30.
UL L 294, 17.9.2004, str. 30.
Done at Brussels, 5 November 2004.
V Bruslju, 5. novembra 2004
Council decision
Sklep Sveta
approving the conclusion by the Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part
o odobritvi s strani Komisije v imenu Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo Začasnega sporazuma o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah med Evropsko skupnostjo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo na eni strani ter Republiko Tadžikistan na drugi strani
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE —
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 101, second paragraph thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti drugega odstavka člena 101 Pogodbe,
Pending the entry into force of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, signed in Luxembourg on 11 October 2004, an Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, should be concluded by the Commission on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community.
do začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki vzpostavlja partnerstvo med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Republiko Tadžikistan na drugi strani, podpisan v Luxembourgu, dne 11. oktobra 2004, mora Komisija v imenu Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo skleniti Začasni sporazum o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah med Evropsko skupnostjo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo na eni strani ter Republiko Tadžikistan na drugi strani —
The conclusion by the Commission, on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community, of the Interim Agreement on trade and trade-related matters between the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the Republic of Tajikistan, of the other part, together with the Annexes and Protocol attached thereto and the Declarations made by the Community unilaterally or jointly with the other Party is hereby approved.
Potrdi se sklenitev Začasnega sporazuma o trgovini in trgovinskih zadevah med Evropsko skupnostjo in Evropsko skupnostjo za atomsko energijo na eni strani ter Republiko Tadžikistan na drugi strani, vključno s priloženimi prilogami in protokoli ter izjavami, ki jih Skupnost poda enostransko ali skupaj z drugo pogodbenico, s strani Komisije v imenu Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo.
The text of the Agreement, Annexes and Protocol and Final Act is attached to this Decision [1].
Besedilo sporazuma, prilog, protokola in sklepne listine je priloženo temu sklepu [1].
Done at Luxembourg, 11 October 2004
V Luxembourgu, 11. oktobra 2004
See p. 2 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 2 tega Uradnega lista.
authorising Austria to apply a measure derogating from Article 21 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes
ki dovoljuje Avstriji uporabo ukrepa o odstopanju od člena 21 Šeste direktive 77/388/EGS o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih
Having regard the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of VAT: uniform basis of assessment [1] and in particular Article 27(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Šeste direktive Sveta 77/388/EGS z dne 17. maja 1977 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih – skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost: enotna osnova za odmero [1], in zlasti člena 27(1) te direktive,
In a request submitted to the Commission and registered by the Commission's Secretariat-General on 3 March 2004, the Austrian Government sought authorisation to introduce three measures derogating from Article 21(1)(a) of Directive 77/388/EEC.
V prošnji, posredovani Komisiji, ki jo je registriral generalni sekretar Komisije dne 3. marca 2004, je avstrijska vlada zaprosila za dovoljenje za uvedbo treh ukrepov, ki odstopajo od člena 21(1)(a) Direktive 77/388/EGS.
The purpose of the derogation requested by Austria is to make the recipient liable for the VAT due in three specific cases: Firstly on the supply of goods provided as security by one VAT taxable person to another person in execution of that security, secondly on the supply of goods following the cession of the reservation of ownership to an assignee and the exercising of this right by the assignee and thirdly on the supply of immovable property by a judgment debtor in a compulsory sale procedure to another person.
Namen prošnje za odstopanje od določil, za katerega je zaprosila Avstrija, je zavezati prejemnike k plačilu DDV v treh določenih primerih: prvič pri dobavi blaga kot varščine, ki ga izroči en davčni zavezanec za DDV drugi osebi za izvršitev tovrstne varščine; drugič za prodajo blaga po cesiji lastninskega pridržka cesionarju in izvajanju pravice s strani cesionarja; in tretjič za prodajo nepremičnin v postopku obvezne prodaje dolžnika po sodbi drugi osebi.
The requested measures are to be considered as measures to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance in the above sectors.
Opisani ukrepi se štejejo za ukrepe, ki preprečujejo določen način preprečevanja izogibanja davkom ali davčnih utaj na zgoraj navedenih področjih.
Where goods are supplied as collateral by one VAT taxable person to the recipient of security in execution of the security, this usually reflects a situation where the guarantor supplying the goods has a limited capacity to settle his debts, including his tax debts.
Kjer ena stranka, ki je zavezanec za DDV, dobavi blago v obliki varščine v izvršitev prejemniku varščine, to običajno izraža situacijo, v kateri je sposobnost garanta, ki blago dobavlja, da bo poravnal svoje obveznosti, vključno z davčnimi dolgovi, omejena.
When the collateral taker who received the goods exercises his rights and sells the collateral to a third party, this sale also generates a supply from the guarantor to the collateral taker.
Ko prejemnik varščine uveljavi svojo pravico in proda blago, ki predstavlja varščino, tretji osebi, predstavlja prodaja garantovo dobavo te varščine kupcu.
In such scenarios VAT losses occurred in many cases because the collateral taker could not be refused his right to deduct and the supplying guarantor could not be held responsible because he was insolvent or had disappeared.
V takih scenarijih pride do izgube DDV zato, ker prejemniku varščine ni bilo mogoče odreči njegove pravice, da DDV odbije, garanta, ki je varščino dobavil, pa zaradi plačilne nesposobnosti oz. ker je izginil ni bilo mogoče terjati za plačilo.