natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lenses, mounted, for use in the manufacture of projection TV [1]
Leče, vdelane, za uporabo v proizvodnji projekcijskih televizorjev [1]
Entry under this subheading is subject to conditions laid down in the relevant Community provisions (see Articles 291 to 300 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p. 71 and subsequent amendments).
Uvoz pod to tarifno podštevilko je pogojen s pogoji iz ustreznih določb Skupnosti (glej člene od 291 do 300 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 – UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str. 71 s spremembami).
trans-4-Hydroxy-L-proline
trans-4-hidroksi-L-prolin
Council Regulation (EC) No 2272/2004
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2272/2004
extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 on imports of coumarin originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of coumarin consigned from India or Thailand, whether declared as originating in India or Thailand or not
o razširitvi dokončne protidampinške dajatve, uvedene z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002 o uvozu kumarina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske, na uvoz kumarina, poslanega iz Indije ali Tajske, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Indije oziroma Tajske ali ne
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (‘the basic Regulation’, and in particular Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (osnovna uredba‘) in zlasti člena 13 Uredbe,
Following an expiry review, by Regulation (EC) No 769/2002 [2] (‘the original Regulation’) the Council imposed a definitive anti-dumping duty of EUR 3479 per tonne on imports of coumarin, falling within CN code ex29322100 originating in the People's Republic of China (‘PRC’).
Po pregledu zaradi izteka ukrepa v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2002 [2] („izvorna Uredba“) je Svet uvedel dokončno protidampinško dajatev v višini 3479 EUR na tono uvoženega kumarina, zajetega v oznaki KN ex29322100 s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
On 24 February 2004, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC (‘the request’).
Komisija je 24. februarja 2004 prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe, da razišče domnevno izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, ki veljajo za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK („zahtevek“).
The request was submitted by the European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC) (‘the applicant’) on behalf of the sole producer in the Community.
Zahtevek je podal Evropski svet za kemično industrijo (CEFIC) („vlagatelj“) v imenu edinega proizvajalca v Skupnosti.
The request alleged that there had been a change in the pattern of trade following the imposition of the anti-dumping measures on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC, as shown by a significant increase in imports of the same product from India and Thailand.
Zahtevek je navajal, da se je vzorec trgovanja po uvedbi proptidampinških ukrepov za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK spremenil, saj se je uvoz enakega proizvoda iz Indije in Tajske močno povečal.
This change in the pattern of trade was alleged to stem from the transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via India and Thailand.
Sprememba vzorca trgovanja je domnevno izvirala iz pretovarjanja kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Indije in Tajske.
It was further alleged that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for these practices other than the existence of the anti-dumping measures on imports of coumarin originating in the PRC.
Domnevalo se je tudi, da te prakse ni bilo mogoče ekonomsko upravičiti ali najti drugih upravičenih razlogov kot je izogibanje protidampinškim ukrepom, ki veljajo za uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz LRK.
Finally, the applicant alleged that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on coumarin originating in the PRC were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices.
Vlagatelj je tudi domneval, da se popravljalni učinek obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov na kumarin, s poreklom iz LRK, slabi v smislu količine in cene.
Significant volumes of imports of coumarin from India and Thailand appeared to have replaced imports of coumarin from the PRC.
Zdi se, da je velik obseg uvoza kumarina iz Indije in Tajske nadomestil uvoz kumarina iz LRK.
In addition, there was sufficient evidence that the increase in imports was made at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the investigation that led to the existing measures, and that dumping was taking place in relation to the normal values previously established for coumarin originating in the PRC.
Poleg tega obstaja dovolj dokazov, da so bile cene povečanega uvoza bistveno nižje kot neškodljive cene, določene v preiskavi, zaradi katere so bili uvedeni obstoječi ukrepi, in da se je glede na predhodno ugotovljene normalne vrednosti kumarina s poreklom iz LRK izvajal damping.
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, India and Thailand, the producers/exporters, the importers in the Community known to be concerned and the applicant of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je uradno seznanila organe LRK, Indije in Tajske, proizvajalce-izvoznike, uvoznike v Skupnost, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, ter vlagatelja o začetku preiskave.
Questionnaires were sent to the producers/exporters in the PRC and India (there were no known producers in Thailand), as well as to the importers in the Community named in the request or known to the Commission from the investigation which led to the imposition of the existing measures.
Proizvajalcem-izvoznikom v LRK in Indiji (na Tajskem ni bilo nobenega znanega proizvajalca), kakor tudi uvoznikom v Skupnosti, omenjenim v zahtevku ali Komisiji znanim iz preiskave, ki je pripeljala do uvedbe sprejetih ukrepov, so bili posredovani vprašalniki.
Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation.
Zainteresirane stranke so dobile priložnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča ter zaprositi za zaslišanje v roku, ki je določen v začetni uredbi.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and findings being made on the basis of the facts available.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene, da lahko nepripravljenost na sodelovanje povzroči uporabo člena 18 osnovne uredbe in privede do ugotovitev na osnovi razpoložljivih dejstev.
No producer or exporter in the PRC or Thailand submitted a reply to the questionnaire.
Nobeden od proizvajalcev ali izvoznikov v LRK ali na Tajskem ni predložil odgovora na vprašalnik.
Replies to the questionnaire were received within the prescribed time limits from one exporting producer in India and one unrelated importer in the Community.
V predpisanih rokih sta odgovore na vprašalnike poslala en proizvajalec–izvoznik v Indiji ter en neodvisni uvoznik v Skupnosti.
The Commission carried out a verification visit at the premises of the following Indian exporting producer:
Komisija je opravila preveritveni obisk kraja poslovanja pri naslednjem indijskem proizvajalcu–izvozniku:
Ltd, Nasik, India
Ltd, Nasik, Indija
The investigation period covered the period from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 (‘IP’).
Obdobje preiskave je zajelo obdobje od 1. aprila 2003 do 31. marca 2004 („OP“).
Data from 2000 up to the end of the IP were collected to investigate the change in the pattern of trade.
Za preiskavo spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja so se zbirali podatki od leta 2000 do konca OP.
General considerations/degree of cooperation
Splošne ugotovitve/stopnja sodelovanja
No producers or exporters of coumarin in Thailand made themselves known or cooperated in the investigation.
Nihče od proizvajalcev ali izvoznikov kumarina na Tajskem se ni javil ali sodeloval v preiskavi.
Accordingly, findings in respect of the exports of coumarin consigned from Thailand to the Community had to be made on the basis of the facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Zaradi tega je bilo potrebno do ugotovitev o izvozu kumarina, poslanega s Tajske v Skupnost, priti na osnovi razpoložljivih dejstev v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe.
At the outset of the investigation, the authorities of Thailand had been informed of the consequences of non-cooperation, as set out in Article 18(6) of the basic Regulation.
Na začetku preiskave so bili tajski organi obveščeni o posledicah zaradi nesodelovanja, določenih v členu 18(6) osnovne uredbe.
One exporting producer in India, Atlas Fine Chemicals Pvt.
Sodeloval je en proizvajalec–izvoznik v Indiji, Atlas Fine Chemicals Pvt.
Ltd, India (‘Atlas’), cooperated, representing more than 90 % in volume and value of the total imports of coumarin from India during the IP.
Ltd, Indija („Atlas“), ter v smislu obsega in vrednosti prikazal več kot 90 % celotnega uvoza kumarina iz Indije v OP.
Atlas had stated in its questionnaire reply that none of its related companies are involved, either directly or indirectly, in the trade and manufacturing of coumarin.
V vprašalniku je Atlas izjavil, da v trgovanje in proizvodnjo kumarina ni, bodisi posredno ali neposredno, vpleteno nobeno od povezanih podjetij.
However, the verification visit revealed that Atlas has two related companies in India: Monolith Chemicals Pvt.
Vendar pa je preveritveni obisk razkril, da je Atlas povezan z dvema podjetjema v Indiji: Monolith Chemicals Pvt.
Ltd. and Aims Impex Pvt.
Ltd. in Aims Impex Pvt.
Ltd. that import coumarin originating in the PRC into India and then sell the imported products to Atlas.
Ltd., ki uvažata kumarin s poreklom iz LRK v Indijo, nato pa uvožene proizvode prodajata Atlasu.
It was made clear to these companies that non-cooperation may lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Nesodelujočim podjetjem je bilo pojasnjeno, da lahko nepripravljenost do sodelovanja privede do uporabe člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
They were also informed of the consequences of non cooperation.
Strankam so bile pojasnjene tudi posledice nesodelovanja.
Product concerned and like product
Zadevni proizvod in podobni proizvodi
The product concerned by the alleged circumvention is, as defined in the original Regulation, coumarin currently classifiable within CN code ex29322100.
Proizvod, ki ga zadeva domnevno izogibanje je, kot je opredeljeno v izvorni uredbi, kumarin, trenutno uvrščen pod oznako KN ex29322100.
Coumarin is a whitish crystalline powder with the characteristic odour of newly mown hay.
Kumarin je belkast kristaliničen prah z značilnim vonjem sveže pokošene trave.
Its main uses are as an aroma chemical and as a fixative in the preparation of fragrance compounds, such compounds being used in the production of detergents, cosmetics and fine fragrances.
V glavnem se uporablja kot kemikalija za arome in kot fiksativ pri pripravi zmesi za dišave. Takšne zmesi se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji detergentov, kozmetike in parfumov.
Coumarin can be manufactured following two different production processes: the Phenol route which involves Perkin reaction and the o-Cresol route which involves Rasching reaction.
Kumarin se lahko proizvaja po dveh proizvodnih postopkih: po fenolni poti, ki vključuje Perkinovo reakcijo, ter po o-krezolni poti, ki vključuje Raschingovo reakcijo.
However, coumarin produced through these two processes has the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and has the same uses.
Vendar ima kumarin, proizveden po teh dveh postopkih, enake osnovne fizikalne in kemijske lastnosti in se ga uporablja v iste namene,
Based on the information gathered during the investigation from the sole cooperating Indian producer and in the absence of cooperation by any other Indian producers and by any parties in Thailand, it must be inferred, in the absence of any contrary evidence, that coumarin exported to the Community from the PRC and coumarin consigned from India and Thailand have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and have the same uses.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je med preiskavo posredoval edini sodelujoči indijski proizvajalec, in zaradi nesodelovanja drugih indijskih proizvajalcev in strank na Tajskem, se zaradi odsotnosti kakršnih koli nasprotujočih si dokazov lahko sklepa, da imata kumarin, izvožen v Skupnost iz LRK, in kumarin, poslan iz Indije in Tajske, enake osnovne fizične in kemijske lastnosti in se uporabljata v iste namene.
They are therefore to be considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe veljata za enaka proizvoda.
As stated above, the change in the pattern of the trade was alleged to stem from transhipment via India and Thailand.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja domnevno izvira iz pretovarjanja preko Indije in Tajske.
As no Thai company cooperated in the investigation, exports from Thailand to the Community had to be established on the basis of the facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
Ker nobeno tajsko podjetje ni sodelovalo v preiskavi, so morali biti izvozi iz Tajske v Skupnost ugotovljeni na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev na podlagi člena 18 osnovne uredbe.
Eurostat data, which were the most appropriate information available, were therefore used to establish the export prices and quantities of imports from Thailand.
S podatki Eurostata, najustreznejšimi razpoložljivimi podatki, so bile ugotovljene izvozne cene in količina uvoza s Tajske.
Imports of coumarin from Thailand increased from 0 tonne in 2000 to 211 tonnes in the IP.
Uvoz kumarina s Tajske se je z 0 ton v letu 2000 povečal na 211 ton v OP.
These imports from Thailand commenced in October 2001, some months after the initiation of expiry review concluded in 2002 (‘the previous investigation’), when it could not be excluded that the measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 600/96 of 25 March 1996 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of coumarin originating in the People's Republic of China [4] would be maintained.
Uvoz s Tajske se je pričel oktobra 2001, nekaj mesecev po začetku pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa, zaključenega leta 2002 („prejšnja preiskava“), ko ni bilo mogoče izključiti, da bodo ohranjeni ukrepi, sprejeti z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 600/96 z dne 25. marca 1996 o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz kumarina s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske [4].
The share of the imports consigned from Thailand in the total volume of imports of coumarin into the Community increased from 0 % in 2000 to 50 % in the IP, while the share of imports into the Community of coumarin from the PRC remained stable at 7 % during the same period.
Delež uvoza, poslanega s Tajske, se je v okviru celotnega uvoza kumarina v Skupnost povečal z 0 % v letu 2000 na 50 % v OP, medtem ko je delež uvoza kumarina iz LRK v Skupnost v istem času ostal enak, in sicer 7 %.
In addition, Chinese export statistics at CN code level show that during the same period exports of coumarin from the PRC in Thailand substantially increased from 1 tonne in 2000 to 270 tonnes in the IP.
Kitajski statistični podatki na ravni oznake KN kažejo tudi, da se je v istem času izvoz kumarina iz LRK na Tajsko močno povečal, in sicer z 1 tone v letu 2000 na 270 ton v OP.
It was also noted that imports from Thailand have compensated to some extent for the decrease in imports from the PRC since measures were originally imposed by Regulation (EC) No 600/96.
Opaženo je bilo tudi, da je uvoz iz Tajske do neke mere nadomestil zmanjšanje uvoza iz LRK, ker so bili ukrepi prvotno uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 600/96.
In the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence it is concluded that there was a change in the pattern of trade between the PRC, Thailand and the Community from 2000 to the IP which stemmed from transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via Thailand.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in pomanjkanja nasprotnih dokazov se lahko sklepa, da se je med letom 2000 in OP spremenil vzorec trgovanja med LRK, Tajsko in Skupnostjo, vzrok za to spremembo pa je pretovarjanje kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Tajske.
The share of the imports consigned from India in the total volume of imports of coumarin into the Community increased from 11 % in 2000 to 35 % in the IP, while the share of imports into the Community of coumarin from the PRC remained stable at 7 % during the same period.
Delež uvoza, poslanega iz Indije, se je v okviru celotnega uvoza kumarina v Skupnost povečal z 11 % v letu 2000 na 35 % v OP, medtem ko je delež uvoza kumarina iz LRK v Skupnost v istem času ostal enak, in sicer 7 %.
Furthermore, Chinese export statistics at CN code level show that during the same period exports of coumarin from the PRC to India substantially increased from 88 tonnes in 2000 to 687 tonnes in the IP.
Kitajski statistični podatki na ravni oznake KN kažejo tudi, da se je v istem času močno povečal izvoz kumarina iz LRK v Indijo in sicer z 88 ton v letu 2000 na 687 ton v OP.
It was also noted that imports from India have compensated to some extent for the decrease in imports from the PRC since measures were originally imposed by Regulation (EC) No 600/96.
Opaženo je bilo tudi, da je uvoz iz Indije do neke mere nadomestil zmanjšanje uvoza iz LRK, ker so bili ukrepi prvotno uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 600/96.
Cooperating exporting producer in India
Sodelujoči proizvajalec – izvoznik iz Indije
Atlas substantially and continuously increased its exports to the Community from 100 [5] in the financial year (‘FY’) 2000/2001 [6] to 1957 in the IP.
Atlas je bistveno in nenehno povečeval svoj izvoz v Skupnost s 100 [5] v finančnem letu („FL“) 2000/2001 [6] na 1957 v OP.
During the same period Atlas increased substantially its purchase of coumarin originating in the PRC from 100 in the FY 2000/2001 to 1411 in the IP.
V istem obdobju je Atlas bistveno povečal nabavo kumarina s poreklom iz LRP s 100 v FL 2000/2001 na 1411 v OP.
It is therefore concluded that Atlas decided to import coumarin of Chinese origin, and after a slight modification re-export it to the Community thereby increasing substantially the share of imports consigned from India to the Community.
Zato se sklepa, da se je Atlas odločil uvoziti kumarin s poreklom iz Kitajske in ga po manjši spremembi ponovno izvoziti v Skupnost in s tem bistveno povečati uvoz, poslan iz Indije v Skupnost.
Non-cooperating companies
Nesodelujoča podjetja
The request mentioned one other producer in India.
V zahtevku je bil omenjen še en proizvajalec v Indiji.
As far as this non-cooperating company is concerned, and indeed any other producers that may exist but have chosen not to cooperate, the export volume and value had to be established on the basis of the facts available pursuant to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem nesodelujočim podjetjem so morale biti količine in vrednosti v skladu s členom 18 osnovne uredbe ugotovljene na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev. S podatki Eurostata, najustreznejšimi razpoložljivimi podatki, so bile ugotovljene izvozne cene in količina uvoza podjetja, ki ni želelo sodelovati.
Eurostat data, which were the most appropriate information available, were therefore used to establish the export prices and quantities of the non-cooperating companies.
Na podlagi tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da se je uvoz nesodelujočega podjetja nekoliko zmanjšal.
On that basis, it was found that imports from the non-cooperating companies slightly decreased.
To je mogoče razložiti tako, da je Atlas na škodo nesodelujočega podjetja znatno povečal svoj izvoz v Skupnost.
Moreover, it should be noted that the imports from the non-cooperating companies only represented 4-7 % [7] in volume and value of the total imports of coumarin from India during the IP.
Prav tako je treba opozoriti na to, da je uvoz podjetja, ki ni želelo sodelovati, predstavljal le 4-7 % [7] celotnega uvoza kumarina iz Indije med OP.
Given the non-cooperation and the small market share of the non-cooperating companies, it was found that the information available for the non-cooperating companies was not such as to invalidate the finding of a change in the pattern of trade.
Zaradi nesodelovanja in nizkega tržnega deleža tega nesodelujočega podjetja je bilo ugotovljeno, da podatki, na voljo za to podjetje, ne bi razveljavili ugotovitev v zvezi s spremembo vzorca trgovanja.
Conclusion for India
Sklep za Indijo
On the basis of the above findings, it is concluded that there was a change in the pattern of trade between India, the PRC and the Community from 2000 to the IP which stemmed from re-export after a slight modification of coumarin originating in the PRC via India by the cooperating company and transhipment of coumarin originating in the PRC via India by non-cooperating companies.
Na podlagi zgornjih ugotovitev se lahko sklepa, da se je med letom 2000 in OP pojavila sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja med Indijo, LRK in Skupnostjo, vzrok za to spremembo pa je izvoz po manjši spremembi kumarina s poreklom iz LRK, preko Indije s strani sodelujočega podjetja ter pretovarjanje kumarina s poreklom iz LRK preko Indije z nesodelujočimi podjetji.
Insufficient due cause or economic justification
Nezadosten upravičeni razlog ali ekonomska upravičenost
As to imports from Thailand, in the absence of cooperation and of any contrary evidence, it is concluded that, given that the imports started some months after the initiation of the previous investigation, probably in anticipation of a renewed imposition of the existing anti-dumping measures, the change in the pattern of trade stemmed from the existence of the anti-dumping measures rather than from any other sufficient due cause or economic justification within the meaning of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Ker ni sodelovala nobena izmed strank s Tajske ter zaradi pomanjkanja kakršnih koli nasprotnih dokazov, je treba, glede na to, da so se uvozi začeli nekaj mesecev po začetku predhodne preiskave, verjetno v pričakovanju obnovitve naloženih obstoječih protidampinških ukrepov, sklepati, da je spremembo v vzorcu trgovanja povzročil obstoj protidampinških ukrepov, ne pa drugi upravičen razlog ali ekonomska upravičenost v smislu člena 13(1) osnovne uredbe.
For the cooperating Indian exporting producer, Atlas, it was found that it imported coumarin produced via the o-Cresol route from the PRC via two related Indian companies.
Za sodelujočega indijskega proizvajalca-izvoznika, Atlas, je bilo ugotovljeno, da je preko dveh indijskih podjetij, s katerima je povezan, iz LRK uvažal kumarin, proizveden po o-krezol poti.
The imported product was further purified by Atlas and this further purified coumarin was then re-exported to the Community.
Uvoženi proizvod je Atlas nato prečistil in ta prečiščeni kumarin nato ponovno izvozil v Skupnost.
In the IP, the volume of coumarin subject to this production process represented 75 % [8] of Atlas' total production volume.
V OP je obseg kumarina, ki je predmet tega proizvodnega procesa, predstavljal 75 % [8] Atlasovega celotnega obsega proizvodnje.
The remaining volume of 25 % [8] For reasons of confidentiality, precise data are not given.
Preostalih 25 % [8] Zaradi zaupnosti niso podani natančni podatki.
represented genuine production in India of coumarin from the Phenol route.
je predstavljalo izvorno proizvodnjo kumarina po fenolski poti v Indiji.
As the CN code declared for the coumarin imported from the PRC and the one declared for the further purified coumarin re-exported by Atlas to the Community is the same, it is concluded that both products are the same and therefore the product re-exported to the Community keeps its Chinese origin.
Ker sta po oznaki KN neprečiščeni kumarin, uvožen iz LRK, in prečiščeni kumarin, ki ga je Atlas ponovno izvozil v Skupnost, enaka, se lahko sklepa, da sta oba proizvoda enaka in da proizvod, ponovno uvožen v Skupnost ohranja kitajsko poreklo.