natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Of course, it ensures that the bank does not disappear from the market altogether.
Seveda preprečuje, da bi banka popolnoma izginila s trga.
But its role is confined to protecting the bank from risks deriving from old business.
Vendar se omejuje na varovanje banke pred tveganji iz starih poslov.
It cannot be used as such to generate new business.
Kot takšna se ne more uporabljati za ustvarjanje novih poslov.
At most, it makes new business possible in that the shielded real estate service companies in particular — and the bank in general — continue to exist.
Nove posle omogoča kvečjemu tako, da varovane družbe za nepremičninske storitve ter banka na splošno sploh še obstajajo na trgu.
But this is no more than an indirect consequence of any aid measure and cannot be used as a criterion to determine whether the amount of the aid as such is limited strictly to safeguarding the continued existence of the undertaking.
Vendar je to posredna posledica vsake pomoči, zato je ni mogoče vzeti za merilo, ali je pomoč kot taka v svojem obsegu strogo omejena na nadaljevanje obstoja podjetja.
The risk shield does not provide the bank with liquidity but merely indemnifies it against the continuing losses of the real estate service companies which the bank could not absorb by itself.
Omejitev tveganja banki ne zagotavlja likvidnosti, ampak jo le osvobaja trajno nastajajočih dodatnih izgub iz poslovanja z nepremičninskimi storitvami, ki jih banka sama ne more absorbirati.
The Land only makes payments ex post for the amount of actual claims by creditors based on a legal entitlement.
Dežela plačuje le naknadno uveljavljane dejanske zahtevke upnikov na osnovi njihove zakonite pravice.
In addition, under the detailed agreement, the Land exercises — via its own risk‐controlling company — extensive rights to carry out inspections and to reserve approval.
Poleg tega dežela s svojimi družbami za nadzor tveganj v skladu s podrobnim sporazumom uresničuje obsežne pravice glede preverjanja in pridržkov do soglasja.
For an in-depth description of the workings of the detailed agreement, the Commission would refer to Germany’s comments.
V zvezi z natančnim opisom mehanizma podrobnega sporazuma se Komisija sklicuje na navedbe Nemčije.
The Commission accordingly regards the risk shield as a whole as being limited to the strict minimum.
Komisija zato meni, da je omejitev tveganja omejena na najmanjšo možno stopnjo.
The Commission also considers that the aid with a maximum economic value of EUR 1,8 billion contained in the agreement between the Land of Berlin and the bank on the treatment of any claims to repayment brought by the Land of Berlin arising out of a decision in case C 48/2002 is limited to the strict minimum.
Tudi pomoč z maksimalno gospodarsko vrednostjo v višini 1,8 milijarde EUR iz Sporazuma med deželo Berlin in banko o obravnavanju morebitnih zahtevkov dežele proti Landesbank Berlin iz Odločbe v postopku C 48/2002 je po mnenju Komisije omejena na najnižjo možno stopnjo.
Without that agreement the bank would, at the request of its auditors, have had to include in its 2002 annual accounts reserves against impending liabilities amounting to hundreds of millions of euros.
Brez Sporazuma bi morala banka na zahtevo revizorjev v letni bilanci 2002 tvoriti rezervacije za grozeče obveznosti v trimestni milijonski višini.
This would have had a negative impact on the bank’s annual results for 2002 and on its own funds.
To bi negativno vplivalo na letni izid 2002 in na lastniški kapital banke.
However, this would happen only in so far as it were necessary to maintain a core‐capital ratio of 6 % on the critical date of 1 January 2004 and so, in the Commission’s view, it constitutes the strict minimum.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj je Komisija mnenja, da znaša dolgoročno nujno potrebna stopnja temeljnega kapitala 6,0 %. Če bi Komisija v svoji Odločbi o postopku C 48/2002 deželi Berlin naložila uveljavljanje zahtevka proti banki za vračilo pomožnega elementa, ki ni združljiv s skupnim trgom, bi ga dežela Berlin pustila v banki kot vlogo. Vendar bi se to zgodilo le do mere, potrebne za ohranjanje stopnje temeljnega kapitala v višini 6,0 % na 1. januar 2004, kar je po mnenju Komisije nujno potrebna najnižja stopnja.
The authorisation by the Commission of the repayment agreement with a maximum economic value of EUR 1,8 billion is limited to an exceptional case similar to the present case, i.e. where and only to the extent the repayment would inevitably undermine the viability of the company and the restructuring plan is otherwise acceptable.
Dovoljenje Komisije za sporazum o vračilu z najvišjo gospodarsko vrednostjo 1,8 milijarde EUR je omejeno na izjemni primer kot je ta; to pomeni samo in le v takem obsegu, v katerem bi vračilni zahtevki neizogibno ogrožali življenjsko sposobnost podjetja in bi bilo sicer načrt prestrukturiranja mogoče dovoliti.
Within this framework, the agreement itself constitutes restructuring aid and thus creates the need for additional compensatory measures to which Germany has finally committed itself, in particular with the divestment of Berliner Bank.
Sporazum o vračilu je v tej zvezi dodatna pomoč za prestrukturiranje, zato terja dodatne dolžnosti, do katerih se je Nemčija končno zavezala, še zlasti z obljubo zagotoviti odsvojitev Berliner Bank.
The aid totalling EUR 9,7 billion consists of three measures: a capital injection of EUR 1,755 billion by the Land of Berlin for BGB in August 2001; the risk shield amounting to a maximum of EUR 21,6 billion in nominal terms that was made available by the Land of Berlin to BGB in the period December 2001 to April 2002 and that has an economic value of EUR 6,1 billion; and the repayment agreement between the Land of Berlin and BGB of December 2002 regarding a potential recovery following a Commission decision in case C 48/2002 (Landesbank Berlin ‐ Girozentrale), which has an economic value of up to EUR 1,8 billion.
Pomoči v skupni višini 9,7 milijarde EUR sestavljajo trije ukrepi: Prvič priliv kapitala, ki ga je avgusta leta 2001 dežela Berlin namenila BGB, v višini 1,755 milijarde EUR; drugič omejitev tveganj, ki jo je dežela Berlin decembra leta 2001/aprila leta 2002 odobrila BGB in sicer v nominalnem najvišjem znesku v višini 21,6 milijarde EUR z gospodarsko vrednostjo v višini 6,1 milijarde EUR; in tretjič Sporazum za vračilni zahtevek, ki sta ga decembra leta 2002 sklenili dežela Berlin in BGB v zvezi z morebitno Odločbo Komisije, ki bi zaključila postopek C48/2002 (Landesbank Berlin — žiro centrala) in utemeljila vračilni zahtevek z gospodarsko vrednostjo do 1,8 milijarde EUR.
All the preconditions for the existence of state aid under Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty are met (state resources, favourable treatment for a specific undertaking, distortion of competition, effect on trade between Member States).
Izpolnjene so vse predpostavke za odobritev državne pomoči v skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 87 Pogodbe ES: državna sredstva, okoriščenje določenega podjetja, učinki izkrivljanja konkurence in oviranje trgovanja med državami članicami.
Of the derogations from the principle of the incompatibility of state aid with the common market, only Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty, read in conjunction with the Community guidelines on state aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty, is applicable.
Od določb o izjemah načela nezdružljivosti državnih pomoči s skupnim trgom ni uporabna nobena druga razen črke (c) tretji odstavek člena 87 Pogodbe ES v povezavi s smernicami Skupnosti za državno pomoč za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah.
In its assessment — and in the light of the criteria in the guidelines — the Commission concludes that the restructuring measures already carried out and those planned are reasonable, logical and fundamentally appropriate in order to enable BGB to restore its long‐term viability.
V svoji oceni, in merjeno po kriterijih smernic, je Komisija prišla do zaključka, da so že izvedeni in načrtovani ukrepi prestrukturiranja razumni, logični in načeloma primerni za omogočanje ponovne vzpostavitve dolgoročne donosnosti BGB.
In the Commission's view, the sales, closures and reduction measures already carried out, planned or promised are sufficient to offset the market‐distorting effects of the aid measures in question.
Po mnenju Komisije za kompenziranje učinkov izkrivljanja konkurence zadevnih ukrepov pomoči že zadoščajo doslej izvedene, načrtovane in odobrene odsvojitve, zaprtja in zmanjšanja.
The Commission considers that the three aid measures granted — the capital injection, the risk shield and the agreement on the treatment of any claims to repayment brought against the bank by the Land of Berlin — are limited to the to the strict minimum needed to enable restructuring to be undertaken in the light of the existing financial resources of the bank and its shareholders.
Vse tri odobrene pomoči, priliv kapitala, omejitev tveganja in Sporazum o obravnavanju morebitnih plačilnih zahtevkov dežele Berlin proti banki, so po mnenju Komisije omejene na najnižjo možno stopnjo, nujno potrebno za prestrukturiranje, ki je v skladu s finančnimi sredstvi banke in njenih delničarjev.
The bank received no surplus cash or surplus own resources which it could have misused for the purposes of an unreasonable expansion of its business at the expense of its competitors,
Banka tako ne bo dobila presežne likvidnosti in prekomernih lastnih sredstev, ki bi jih lahko zlorabila za neprimerno širitev svojega posla v breme svojih tekmic —
The following measures for the Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG group (‘BGB’) constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty:
Naslednji ukrepi v korist koncerna Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG („BGB“) so državna pomoè v smislu prvega odstavka èlena 87 Pogodbe ES:
the capital injection of EUR 1,755 billion by the Land of Berlin in August 2001;
priliv kapitala dežele Berlin v avgustu leta 2001 v višini 1,755 milijarde EUR;
the guarantees (‘risk shield’) with a maximum nominal value of EUR 21,6 billion granted by the Land of Berlin on 20 December 2001 and 16 April 2002;
garancije („omejitev tveganja“) z maksimalno nominalno vrednostjo v višini 21,6 milijarde EUR, ki jih je dežela Berlin odobrila dne 20. decembra 2001 in dne 16. aprila 2002;
the agreement of 26 December 2002 between the Land of Berlin and the Landesbank Berlin (LBB) on the treatment of any claims brought by the Land of Berlin against LBB following a final decision by the Commission in case C 48/2002, which is pending.
sporazum z dne 26. decembra 2002 med deželo Berlin in Landesbank Berlin („LBB“) o obravnavanju morebitnih zahtevkov dežele Berlin proti LBB po dokončni odločitvi Komisije v še neodločenem postopku C 48/2002.
The aid measures referred to in paragraph 1 are compatible with the common market, provided that Germany fully observes the undertakings communicated by Germany and set out in Article 2(1) of this decision and in the Annex hereto and provided that the aid referred to in paragraph 1(c) does not give rise to a core‐capital ratio, as at 1 January 2004 of over 6 % for BGB group (taking into account the hiving‐off of IBB in accordance with Article 2(1)(d).
Pomoèi, ki so imenovane v odstavku 1, so združljive s skupnim trgom, èe se bo Nemèija v celoti držala obljub, ki jih je zvezna vlada predložila s sporoèilom z dne 6. februarja 2004 in ki so strnjene èlenu 2(1) in v Prilogi te odloèbe in èe pomoèi, ki so navedene v 1(c) s 1. januarjem 2004 pri koncernu BGB ne bodo povzroèile nedoseganja 6,0 % stopnje temeljnega kapitala (ob upoštevanju izloèitve IBB v skladu s èlenom 2(1)(d).
Germany has undertaken:
Nemèija je privolila,
to ensure timely implementation of the notified restructuring plan in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex;
zagotoviti pravočasno izvedbo prijavljenega načrta prestrukturiranja v skladu s pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi;
to ensure that the Land of Berlin sells it holding in BGB in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex;
zagotoviti odsvojitev udeležbe dežele Berlin v BGB v skladu s pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi;
to ensure that the BGB group sells or liquidates all holdings in real estate service companies covered by the risk shield of 16 April 2002 in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex;
zagotoviti odsvojitev ali likvidacijo vseh udeležb v družbah za nepremičninske storitve koncerna BGB, zajetih v omejitvi tveganja z dne 16. aprila 2002 in sicer pod pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi;
to ensure that IBB's special reserve is transferred back in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex;
zagotoviti, da bo namenska rezerva IBB izločena iz LBB pod pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi;
to ensure that the BGB group sells the ‘Berliner Bank’ division of LBB in accordance with the conditions laid down in the Annex;
zagotoviti odsvojitev oddelka LBB „Berliner Bank“ koncerna BGB v skladu s pogoji, navedenimi v Prilogi
to ensure that the BGB group sells its holding in BGB Ireland plc by no later than 31 December 2005.
zagotoviti, da bo koncern BGB najkasneje do 31. decembra 2005, likvidiral svojo udeležbo v BGB Ireland plc.
Where appropriate, and on a sufficiently reasoned request from Germany, the Commission may:
Komisija lahko po priglasitvi na dovolj utemeljeno prošnjo Nemčije
grant an extension of the deadlines specified in the undertakings, or
odobri podaljšanje roka, določenega v zavezah ali
in exceptional cases, dispense with, amend or replace one or more of the requirements or conditions set out in those undertakings.
se pod izjemnimi okoliščinami odpove eni ali več dolžnostim in pogojem v teh zavezah, jih spremeni ali nadomesti.
If Germany requests that a deadline be extended, a sufficiently reasoned request shall be sent to the Commission at the latest one month before expiry of that deadline.
Če Nemčija zaprosi za podaljšanje roka, mora najkasneje en mesec pred iztekom zadevnega roka Komisiji predati dovolj utemeljeno prošnjo.
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this decision, of the measures that have been taken and the measures it intends to take to comply with this decision.
Nemčija v dveh mesecev po uradni objavi te odločbe obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela in namerava sprejeti za izvajanje te odločbe.
This decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
Germany is required to forward a copy of this decision to the recipient of the aid immediately.
Nemčija je pozvana, da kopijo te odločbe takoj posreduje prejemniku pomoči.
Done at Brussels, 18 February 2004.
V Bruslju, 18. februarja 2004
OJ C 141, 14.6.2002, p. 2.
UL C 141, 14.6.2002, str. 2.
OJ C 130, 1.6.2002, p. 5.
UL C 130, 1.6.2002, str. 5.
See footnote 2.
Glej opombo pod èrto 2.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed: those parts are enclosed in square brackets.
Zaupne informacije
Berliner Bank previously formed part of BGB, and Berliner Sparkasse formed part of LBB.
Pred tem je bila Berliner Bank del BGB in Berliner Sparkasse del LBB.
See footnote 2 and speech to the general meeting by Mr Vetter, chairman of the managing board, on 4 July 2003 (http://www.bankgesellschaft.de/bankgesellschaft/20_ir/30_hauptversammlung/index.html); see paragraph 298.
Glej opombo pod èrto 2 in govor predsednika upravnega odbora Vetterja na skupšèini dne 4. julija. 2003 (http://www.bankgesellschaft.de/bankgesellschaft/20_ir/30_hauptversammlung/index.html); glej obrobno številko 298.
See http://www.bankgesellschaft.de/bankgesellschaft/50_pk/index.html (private customers, first giro accounts).
Glej http://www.bankgesellschaft.de/bankgesellschaft/50_pk/index.html (podroèje poslovanja Zasebne stranke, prva povezava depozitarnega raèuna).
Answer given by Germany, June 2002; according to ‘Eurohypo’ decision of 19 June 2002 of the German antitrust authority (Bundeskartellamt), the leaders of the various segments of the real estate financing business in 2001, by portfolio and by new business, were the new firm Eurohypo, the Hypovereinsbank group, the Depfa group, the BHF group, and BayLB.
Stališèe Nemèije iz junija 2002; v skladu z Odloèbo „Eurohyp“ Zveznega kartelnega urada z dne 19. junija 2002 so bile ustanovljene Eurohyp, Hypovereinsbankgruppe, Depfa-Gruppe, BHF-Gruppe in BayLB na razliènih delnih trgih financiranja nepremiènin v letu 2001 vodilne glede na portfelj kot tudi glede na nove sklenjene posle.
Deutsche Bank itself, without the business it had contributed to the new Eurohypo, was likewise still ranked ahead of BGB, which the decision does not list among the leading competitors.
Po tem je tudi sama Deutsche Banka (to je brez poslovnega deleža, ki ga je vnesla v Eurohyp) pred BGB, ki v tej odloèbi ne bo navedena med vodilnimi tekmeci.
Since 1 May 2002, when banking, insurance and stock exchange supervision were merged, the Federal Institute for Financial Services Supervision (BAFin).
Od 1. 5. 2002, po združitvi Agencije za banèni, zavarovalniški in borzni nadzor: Zvezni zavod za nadzor finanènih storitev (BAFin).
Published in Gesetz‐ und Verordnungsblatt für Berlin, 58th year, No 13, 24.4.2002.
UL za Berlin, letnik 58, št. 13, 24.4.2002.
OJ C 141, 14.6.2002, p. 11.
UL C 141, 14.6.2002, str. 11.
OJ C 239, 4.10.2002, p. 12.
UL C 239, 4.10.2002, str. 12.
Joined Cases C‐278/92, C‐279/92 and C‐280/92 Spain v Commission [1994]* ECR I‐4103.
Sodba Sodišèa Evropskih Skupnosti z dne 14. 9. 1994 v povezanih pravnih zadevah C-278 in C-280/92, Španija proti Komisiji, zbirka. 1994, str. I-4103.
OJ C 288, 9. 10. 1999, p. 2.
UL C 288, 9.10.1999, str. 2.
See, for example, Commission Decision 98/490/EC of 20 May 1998 concerning aid granted by France to the Crédit Lyonnais group (OJ L 221, 8.8.1998, p. 28).
Glej na primer Odloèbo Komisije 98/490/ES z dne 20. maja 1998 o pomoèi, odobreni s strani Francije skupini Crédit Lyonnais,UL L 221, 8.8.1998, str. 28.
Commission observation: according to the agreement on German development banks, government assistance is a task for the public sector and does not therefore represent a commercial activity with implications for competition and so cannot be recognised as a compensatory measure.
Opomba Komisije: Naloge pospeševanja so po navedbi nemških razvojnih bank javna naloga in tako niso komercialna dejavnost, pomembna za konkurenco, zato jih ni mogoèe šteti med kompenzacijske ukrepe.
Institutional liability (Anstaltslast) and guarantor liability (Gewährträgerhaftung) can be preserved in the case of government assistance business only if that business is hived off to an independent development bank.
Obveznost ohranjanja javnega podjetja in jamstvo garanta je mogoèe pri razvojnih dejavnostih ohraniti le, èe se izloèijo in oblikujejo kot samostojna razvojna banka.
This theoretical, rounded maximum is arrived at by applying the methodology used in the Commission WestLB decision 2000/392/EC (OJ L 150, 23.6.2000, p. 1) to work out a normal market compensation, taking into consideration the judgment by the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 6 March 2003 in Joined Cases T‐228/99 and T‐233/99, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, Rec. 2003, p. II-435, and the relevant data for LBB, plus compound interest.
Teoretièen in zaokrožen najvišji znesek je rezultat uporabe metode za izraèun obièajnih nadomestil, uporabljen v Odloèbi Komisije 2000/392/ES („WestLB“) ( UL L 150, 23.6.2000, str. 1) ob upoštevanju razsodbe prvostopenjskega sodišèa z dne 6. 3. 2003 v povezanih pravnih zadevah T-228/99 in T-233/99, Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale et Land Nordrhein-Westfalen proti Komisiji, Rec. 2003, str. II-435, podatkov, pomembnih za LBB in obrestnih obresti.
See OJ C 146, 19.6.2002, p. 6, and OJ C 150, 22.6.2002, p. 7.
Glej UL C 146, 19.6.2002, str. 6 in UL C 150, 22.6.2002, str. 7.
On the basis of the institutional liability, which is applicable until July 2005, the Land of Berlin is, as regards its internal relationship with LBB, required to provide LBB, as a public‐law body, with resources in such a way that it is able to perform its tasks.
Na podlagi obveznosti za ohranjanje javnega podjetja, obstojeèe do junija 2005, je Zvezna država Berlin v internem razmerju z LBB obvezana LBB zagotoviti sredstva kot javno pravni ustanovo tako, da je sposobna izpolnjevati svoje naloge.
However, if the Land decides to terminate the business, the guarantor liability is triggered.
Èe se pa bo dežela odloèila za prekinitev poslovanja, zaène veljati jamstvo garanta.
In 1993 the Land of Berlin issued a statement to the Deposit Guarantee Fund of private German banks regarding Berliner Bank AG, which had in the meantime merged with BGB, to the effect that, according to the German authorities, the risk of liability on the part of the Land of Berlin towards the Deposit Guarantee Fund was not, however, ruled out.
Zvezna država Berlin je leta 1993 podala izjavo v zvezi z varnostnimi skladi za vloge zasebnih nemških bank za Berliner Bank AG, ki se je medtem združila z BGB, na podlagi katere ni bilo izkljuèeno tveganje jamstva dežele Berlin za varnostne sklade za vloge Nemèije.
It is to this case that the estimates refer.
Ocenjene vrednosti veljajo za ta primer.
This figure also took into account the hiving-off of the public development activities of IBB.
Številka zajema tudi izločitev razvojnega posla IBB.
See, for example, Decision 98/490/EC.
Glej na primer Odločbo 98/490/ES.
In establishing the own‐funds ratio, the amount of additional capital taken into account may not exceed the amount of the available core capital.
Dodatni kapital je potrebno pri določanju stopnje lastniškega kapitala upoštevati samo do višine obstoječega temeljnega kapitala.
See OJ C 146, 19.6.2002, p. 6 and OJ C 150, 22.6.2002, p. 7.
Teoretični in zaokrožen najvišji znesek je izid ob uporabi metode za izračun tržno običajnega nadomestila, ki jo je Komisija uporabila v odločbi „WestLB“ z dne 8. julija 1999, z upoštevanjem sodbe prvostopenjskega sodišča z dne 6. marca 2003 ter podatkov, pomembnih za LBB in prištetimi obrestnimi obrestmi.
There may be discrepancies due to rounding.
Možne razlike zaradi zaokrožanja.
Under the agreement on German development banks, development/support activities are a public service and not a commercial activity open to competition; they therefore cannot be viewed as compensatory measures.
Razvojni posel je v skladu z informacijami o nemških razvojnih bankah javna naloga, zato ne predstavlja konkurenčno pomembne komercialne dejavnosti, tako je tudi ni mogoče priznati kot kompenzacijski ukrep.
Institutional liability and guarantor liability can be maintained for the development business only if it is hived off as an independent development bank.
Obveznost za ohranjanje javnega podjetja in jamstvo garanta se lahko pri razvojnem poslu ohranita le pri njegovi izločitvi v samostojno razvojno banko.
According to the Federal Cartel Office’s decision of 19 June 2002 in Eurohypo, the newly created Eurohypo, the Hypovereinsbank group, the Depfa group, the BHF group and BayLB led the various submarkets in the real estate financing sector in 2001, in terms of both existing and new business.
V skladu z Odloèbo „Eurohyp“ Zveznega kartelnega urada z dne 19. junija 2002 so bile ustanovljene Eurohyp, Hypovereinsbankgruppe, Depfa-Gruppe, BHF-Gruppe in BayLB na razliènih delnih trgih financiranja nepremiènin v letu 2001 vodilne glede na portfelj kot tudi glede na nove sklenjene posle.
Even Deutsche Bank itself (i.e. without its share in Eurohypo) came before BGB, which in this decision was not listed among the leading competitors with market shares of 5 % or more.
Po tem je tudi sama Deutsche Banka (to je brez poslovnega deleža, ki ga je vnesla v Eurohyp) je po teh podatkih pred pred BGB, ki v tej odločbi ni navedena med glavnimi tekmicami s 5 % ali višjimi tržnimi deleži
In Berlin a bank retains around 75‐90 % of its customers in the event of branch closures.
Ob upoštevanju tega ohrani banka v Berlinu, ki zapre svojo podružnico, približno 75 % do 90 % prizadetih strank.