natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 28 June 2002, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [5], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of Council Regulation 2026/97 [6].
Dne 28. junija 2002 je Komisija z obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [5] najavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 19 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 [6].
The request is limited in scope to the form of the measure and, in particular, to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by the applicant.
Obseg prošnje je omejen na obliko ukrepa in še posebej na preiskavo sprejemljivosti zaveze, ki jo je ponudil vlagatelj.
This review is still ongoing.
Pregled je še vedno v teku.
On 22 November 2003, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation, limited in scope to the form of the anti-dumping measures.
Dne 22. novembra 2003 je Komisija z obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7] najavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki je omejena na obliko protidampinških ukrepov.
On 19 February 2004, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [8], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation limited to dumping for the Indian exporting producer Jindal Polyester Limited.
Dne 19. februarja 2004 je Komisija z obvestilom v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [8] najavila uvedbo delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) osnovne uredbe, ki je omejena na damping indijskega proizvajalca izvoznika Jindal Polyester Limited.
REQUEST
ZAHTEVA
On 6 January 2004, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 13(3) of the basic Regulation (the request) from the Community producers DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH and Nuroll SpA (the applicants) to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of PET film originating in India.
Dne 6. januarja 2004 je Komisija prejela zahtevo v skladu s členom 13(3) osnovne uredbe („zahteva“) proizvajalcev Skupnosti DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH in Nuroll SpA („vlagatelji“) za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja protidampinškim ukrepom, uvedenim za uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije.
The applicants represent a major proportion of the Community production of PET film.
Vlagatelji predstavljajo večji delež proizvajalcev PET folije v Skupnosti.
The applicants alleged and submitted sufficient evidence showing that, following the imposition of measures on imports of PET film originating, inter alia, in India, there had been significant changes in the patterns of trade involving exports of PET film from India, Brazil and Israel to the Community.
Vlagatelji so trdili in predložili zadostne dokaze, ki kažejo, da so nastale po uvedbi ukrepov za uvoz PET folije, med drugim s poreklom iz Indije, bistvene spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja v zvezi z izvozom PET folije iz Indije, Brazilije in Izraela v Skupnost.
These changes in the patterns of trade were alleged to stem from the transhipment via Brazil and via Israel of PET film originating in India.
Spremembe vzorca trgovanja so domnevno izvirale iz pretovarjanja PET folije s poreklom iz Indije preko Brazilije in preko Izraela.
It was alleged that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for the aforementioned changes other than the imposition of the duty on imports of PET film from India.
Trdili so, da ni drugih potrebnih razlogov ali ekonomske razlage za prej omenjene spremembe kot naložitev dajatev na uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije.
Finally, the applicants alleged and submitted prima facie evidence that the remedial effects of this duty were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices.
Končno so vlagatelji trdili in predložili zadostne dokaze, ki kažejo, da so popravljalni učinki dajatev oslabljeni v smislu količine in cene.
It was claimed that significant volumes of imports of PET film from Brazil and Israel appear to have replaced imports of PET film originating in India.
Trdili so, da kaže, da so znatne količine uvoza PET folije iz Brazilije in Izraela nadomestile uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije.
In addition, the applicant submitted prima facie evidence that the prices of PET film imported from Brazil and Israel were dumped in relation to the normal values previously established for PET film originating in India.
Nadalje so vlagatelji predložili verjetne dokaze, da so cene PET folije, ki se uvaža iz Brazilije in Izraela, dampinške v primerjavi z normalno, predhodno ugotovljeno vrednostjo PET folije s poreklom iz Indije.
INITIATION
ZAČETEK POSTOPKA
By Regulation (EC) No 284/2004 [9] (the initiating Regulation), the Commission initiated an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures on imports of PET film originating in India by imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not and, pursuant to Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, directed the customs authorities to register imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether originating in Brazil or Israel or not, as of 20 February 2004.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 284/2004 [9] („začetna uredba“) je Komisija začela preiskavo o morebitnem izogibanju protidampinškim ukrepom za uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije z uvozom PET folije, poslane iz Brazilije in iz Izraela, ki se prijavi kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne, in v skladu s členoma 13(3) in 14(5) osnovne uredbe naložila carinskim organom, da od 20. februarja 2004 registrirajo uvoz PET folije, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in iz Izraela in se prijavi kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne.
The Commission advised the authorities of India, Brazil and Israel of the initiation of the investigation.
Komisija je organe Indije, Brazilije in Izraela obvestila o začetku preiskave.
At the same time, by Regulation (EC) No 283/2004 [10] the Commission also initiated an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of countervailing measures on imports of PET film originating in India by imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Sočasno je Komisija z Uredbo (ES) št. 283/2004 [10] uvedla tudi preiskavo o morebitnem izogibanju izravnalnim ukrepom za uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije z uvozom PET folije, poslane iz Brazilije in iz Izraela, ki se prijavi kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne.
The findings of that investigation are presented in Council Regulation (EC) No 1976/2004 [11].
Ugotovitve preiskave so predstavljene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1976/2004 [11].
The Indian authorities indicated that they considered that anti-circumvention investigations were not permissible under either the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 or the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
Indijski organi so navedli, da štejejo preiskavo proti izogibanju za nedopustno po Sporazumu o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini iz leta 1994 oz. po Sporazumu o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih.
This claim was rejected on the grounds that the anti-circumvention provisions of the basic Regulation are not incompatible with the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
Ta trditev je bila zavrnjena na podlagi tega, da določbe proti izogibanju iz osnovne uredbe niso nezdružljive s Sporazumom o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini iz leta 1994 in Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih.
Indeed, the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations contains a Decision on Anti-Circumvention [12] referring the matter to the Committee on Anti-Dumping Practices in the absence of an agreement on a specific text.
Še več, sklepna listina, ki vsebuje rezultate urugvajskega kroga večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj, vsebuje Sklep proti izogibanju [12] in prepušča zadevo Odboru za protidampinške prakse, če ni sporazuma o določenem besedilu.
As this Decision was made knowing that several WTO Members already had their own anti-circumvention legislation, the European Community interprets it as permitting individual Members to adopt or maintain provisions in this respect, pending the adoption of multilaterally agreed rules.
Ta sklep je bil sprejet ob upoštevanju, da imajo številne članice STO že svojo lastno zakonodajo proti izogibanju, zato si ga Evropska skupnost razlaga, kot da dovoljuje posameznim članicam, da sprejmejo ali ohranijo predpise na tem področju do sprejetja večstransko dogovorjenih pravil.
The same principles should logically apply to anti-subsidy investigations.
Ista načela se uporabljajo za protisubvencijske preiskave.
INVESTIGATION
PREISKAVA
Questionnaires were sent to exporters/producers in India, Brazil and Israel which cooperated in the original investigation, were named in the request or subsequently became known to the Commission.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani izvoznikom proizvajalcem v Indiji, Braziliji in Izraelu, ki sosodelovali v predhodni preiskavi, bili imenovani v zahtevi ali postali kasneje znani Komisiji.
Questionnaires were sent to importers in the Community which were named in the request or cooperated in the original investigation that led to the existing measures.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani uvoznikom v Skupnosti, ki so bili imenovani v zahtevi ali ki so sodelovali v predhodni preiskavi, katere rezultat so obstoječi ukrepi.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to findings which, being made on the basis of the facts available, can be less favourable than if the party had cooperated.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene, da lahko nepripravljenost sodelovati povzroči uporabo člena 18 osnovne uredbe in privede do zaključkov na podlagi dokazov, ki so na voljo, kar je lahko za stranko manj ugodno kot v primeru, da bi sodelovala.
Replies to the questionnaire were received from five exporters/producers in India, from one exporter/producer in Brazil and from one processing company involved in slitting, sheeting and converting PET film in Israel and exporting PET film to the Community.
Odgovore na vprašalnik je poslalo pet izvoznikov proizvajalcev iz Indije, en izvoznik proizvajalec iz Brazilije in eno predelovalno podjetje, ki se ukvarja z razrezovanjem, valjanjem in preoblikovanjem PET folije v Izraelu ter z izvozom PET folije v Skupnost.
Another company in Israel came forward and explained that it processed PET film but that the resulting products were not exported under the CN codes under which PET film was classified.
Druga družba iz Izraela je razložila, da je predelovala PET folijo, da pa tako nastali izdelki niso bili izvoženi pod oznakami KN, pod katere je uvrščena PET folija.
On that basis the company did not submit a questionnaire reply.
Zato družba ni posredovala odgovora na vprašalnik.
Five importers in the Community came forward following receipt of questionnaires.
Pet uvoznikov v Skupnosti se je oglasilo po prejemu vprašalnikov.
Three of these reported that they had never imported PET film from either Brazil or Israel.
Trije od teh so poročali, da nikoli niso uvažali PET folije iz Brazilije ali Izraela.
The other two importers stated that they had not imported Indian PET film from Brazil or from Israel during the investigation period.
Druga dva uvoznika sta trdila, da nista nikoli v odboju preiskave uvažala indijske PET folije iz Brazilije ali Izraela.
Therefore, none of these companies submitted questionnaire replies.
Zato ni nobena od teh družb posredovala odgovora na vprašalnik.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je opravila obiske zaradi preveritve v naslednjih družbah:
Brazilian exporting producer:
Brazilski proizvajalec izvoznik:
Israeli processor:
Izraelski predelovalec:
Indian exporting producers:
Indijski proizvajalci izvozniki:
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 (the IP).
Obdobje preiskave je trajalo od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2003 („OP“).
Data was collected from 2000 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade.
Podatki so se zbirali od leta 2000 naprej do konca OP, da bi se preiskale domnevne spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja.
DEGREE OF COOPERATION
STOPNJA SODELOVANJA
As stated in recital 12, five exporters/producers of PET film in India cooperated in the investigation by submitting questionnaire replies.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (12), je pet proizvajalcev izvoznikov PET folij v Indiji sodelovalo v preiskavi s posredovanjem odgovora na vprašalnike.
Information was also obtained from one exporting producer of PET film in Brazil and from one processing company slitting, sheeting and converting PET film in Israel.
Podatki so bili pridobljeni tudi od proizvajalca izvoznika PET folij v Braziliji ter od ene predelovalne družbe, ki se ukvarja z razrezovanjem, valjanjem in preoblikovanjem PET folije v Izraelu.
These Brazilian and Israeli companies accounted for a minor part (less than 1 % and around 5 %, respectively) both in volume and in value, of the total imports of PET film from those countries to the Community during the IP as reported by Eurostat.
Po podatkih Eurostata so te brazilske in izraelske družbe predstavljale samo majhen delež (manj kot 1 % oziroma okoli 5 %) skupnega uvoza PET folije po obsegu in vrednosti iz teh držav v Skupnost v OP.
The Indian authorities made a written submission further to the initiation of the investigation and provided statistical information concerning exports of PET film from India to, inter alia, the Community.
Indijski organi so zaradi začetka preiskave predložili pisno poročilo s statističnimi podatki o izvozu PET folije iz Indije v, med drugim, Skupnost.
Statistical data concerning exports of PET film from Brazil to the Community were also obtained from the Brazilian national database.
Statistični podatki o izvozu PET folije iz Brazilije v Skupnost so bili pridobljeni tudi iz brazilske nacionalne baze podatkov.
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
ZADEVNI IZDELEK IN PODOBNI IZDELKI
The product concerned is, as defined in the original investigation, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, normally declared under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 (the product concerned).
Zadevni izdelek je, kot je bil opredeljen v predhodni preiskavi, polietilentereftalatska (PET) folija s poreklom iz Indije, običajno prijavljena pod oznakami KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 („zadevni izdelek“).
It is considered that PET film exported to the Community from India and PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel to the Community have the same basic characteristics and the same uses.
Šteje se, da imata PET folija, ki se v Skupnost izvaža iz Indije, in PET folija, ki se v Skupnost pošilja iz Brazilije in Izraela, enake osnovne značilnosti ter enake uporabe.
Therefore, they are considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Zato veljata za podobna izdelka v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe.
CHANGE IN THE PATTERN OF TRADE
SPREMEMBA V VZORCU TRGOVANJA
Over the period 1999 to 2003, imports of the product concerned represented 96,5 % of total imports from India under the relevant CN codes.
V obdobju 1999–2003 so uvozi zadevnega izdelka predstavljali 96,5 % uvoza iz Indije iz ustreznih oznak KN.
Market analysis was therefore carried out using Eurostat data at CN code level.
Tržna analiza je bila torej opravljena s pomočjo uporabe podatkov Eurostata po oznakah KN.
It should be noted that in 1999 countervailing duties had been imposed on imports to the Community of PET film originating in India, which had already prompted a decrease in volumes of such imports.
Potrebno je poudariti, da so izravnalne dajatve, uvedene leta 1999 za uvoz PET folije s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost, povzročile upad obsega uvoza.
This was followed by the imposition of anti-dumping measures in 2001 which led to a further decrease.
Temu je sledila uvedba protidampinških ukrepov leta 2001, ki je povzročila nadaljnji upad.
Anti-dumping measures concerning India consist of price-based undertaking agreements with five individual exporting producers and one company with a 0 % anti-dumping duty rate.
Protidampinški ukrepi v zvezi z Indijo vključujejo dogovore o zavezah na osnovi cen s petimi posameznimi proizvajalci izvozniki in eno družbo s stopnjo protidampinške dajatve, ki znaša 0 %.
As a result, anti-dumping duties are essentially not payable on imports from the larger part of the Indian producers.
Posledično se protidampinške dajatve v bistvu ne plačujejo na uvoz zadevnega izdelka večjega dela indijskih proizvajalcev.
A residual anti-dumping duty of 53,3 % is applicable to imports from all other exporting producers.
Preostala protidampinška dajatev v višini 53,3 % se uporablja za uvoz za vse ostale proizvajalce izvoznike.
In 2000 imports to the Community of PET film originating in India stood at 11600 tonnes.
Leta 2000 so uvozi PET folije s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost znašali 11600 ton.
Those imports initially decreased to 6100 tonnes in 2001 but then increased to 7700 tonnes in 2002, and further increased during the IP to 11500 tonnes.
Najprej se je uvoz zmanjšal na 6100 ton v letu 2001, vendar se je nato povečal na 7700 ton leta 2002, ter še naprej na 11500 ton v času PO.
The data submitted by the cooperating Indian exporting producers showed similar trends — an increase of around 1300 tonnes from 2001 to 2002 and a further increase of around 3400 tonnes from 2002 to 2003.
Podatki, ki so jih posredovali indijski proizvajalci izvozniki so pokazali podobne težnje – povečanje za približno 1300 ton od leta 2001 do 2002 in nadaljnje povečanje za približno 3400 ton od 2002 do 2003.
It should be borne in mind however that not all Indian producers cooperated in the investigation.
Potrebno se je zavedati, da v preiskavi niso sodelovali vsi indijski proizvajalci.
Furthermore, as regards the changes in volumes from 2000 to 2003, these should be viewed in the context of a large increase of imports from those exporters which are subject to the lowest levels of measures.
Nadalje je treba na spremembe v obsegu od leta 2000 do 2003 gledati v okviru velikega porasta uvoza izvoznikov, za katere se uporablja najnižja stopnja ukrepov.
In respect of the above pattern it is noted that one company had a significantly lower cumulative duty [13] rate than the other producers.
V zvezi z zgornjim vzorcem je treba poudariti, da je imela ena družba bistveno nižjo skupno stopnjo dajatve [13] v primerjavi z ostalimi proizvajalci.
This company's trading pattern followed a markedly different trend to that of the other producers, hugely increasing its share of all sales of the product concerned to the Community between 2000 and 2003 (the IP).
Trend vzorca trgovanja te družbe je bil bistveno drugačen od trenda ostalih proizvajalcev, saj se je delež prodaje zadevnih izdelkov v Skupnost med leti 2000 in 2003 (OP) izjemno povečal.
Conversely, the share of the product concerned exported to the Community by the remaining Indian producers fell massively.
Nasprotno se je delež izvoza zadevnih izdelkov v Skupnost ostalih indijskih proizvajalcev močno zmanjšal.
Discounting this irregular trend, the total volume of the product concerned imported into the Community remained well below that prior to the imposition of anti-dumping measures.
Če odmislimo ta nepravilni trend, je skupen obseg uvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost krepko zaostajal za uvozom pred uvedbo protidampinških ukrepov.
The Indian authorities submitted statistical data on exports to, inter alia, the Community.
Indijski organi so posredovali statistične podatke o, med drugim, izvozu v Skupnost.
They indicated that they considered that the official Indian statistics did not suggest any circumvention of the existing anti-dumping measures by the Indian PET film producers.
Iz njih je bilo razvidno, da uradna indijska statistika ne nakazuje, da bi se indijski proizvajalci PET folije izogibali obstoječim protidampinškim ukrepom.
However, the data referred to is inconsistent with the export data provided by the cooperating Indian exporters, at least as far as exports to Israel are concerned; these data show a clear increase in exports to Israel following the imposition of measures (from around 40 tonnes in 2000 to around 800 tonnes in the IP).
Vendar pa so podatki izkazovali nedoslednost izvoznih podatkov, ki so jih posredovali sodelujoči indijski izvozniki, vsaj kar zadeva izvoz v Izrael; ti podatki so kazali jasen porast izvoza v Izrael po uvedbi ukrepov (s približno 40 ton leta 2000 na približno 800 ton v OP).
As far as Brazil is concerned, official Indian export data for direct exports to Brazil show only a marginal increase over the same period, but this does not include indirect sales via other intermediary countries.
Kar zadeva Brazilijo, so uradni indijski izvozni podatki za neposreden izvoz v Brazilijo kazali le manjši porast v istem obdobju, vendar pa to ne vključuje posredne prodaje preko drugih držav posrednic.
Indeed, the only known Brazilian producer of PET film cooperated in the investigation and its exports to the Community only represent a negligible part (0,5 %) of all sales to the Community from Brazil.
Še več, edini znani brazilski proizvajalec PET folij je v preiskavi sodeloval in njegov izvoz v Skupnost je predstavljal le zanemarljiv delež (0,5 %) vse prodaje v Skupnost iz Brazilije.
Imports into the Community of PET film from Brazil as reported by Eurostat at CN level, less the imports of goods produced by the cooperating company, increased from around 650 tonnes in 2000 (0,6 % of total imports), to 1200 tonnes (1,4 %) in 2001 and just over 2500 tonnes (3,2 %) in 2002, the year following the imposition of anti-dumping measures, remaining at just over 2000 tonnes during the IP (2,4 % of total PET film imports).
Uvoz PET folije v Skupnost iz Brazilije je po podatkih Eurostata na podlagi KN, po odbitku uvoza blaga, ki ga je proizvedla sodelujoča družba, porasel s približno 650 ton v letu 2000 (0,6 % vsega uvoza) na 1200 ton (1,4 %) v letu 2001 in na nekoliko nad 2500 ton (3,2 %) v letu 2002, tj. v letu, ki je sledilo uvedbi protidampinških ukrepov, in obstal na nekoliko nad 2000 tonami v PO (2,4 % vsega uvoza PET folije).
The sole cooperating company in Brazil, Terphane, is, as noted above (recital 22), the only known producer of PET film in Brazil.
Edina sodelujoča družba v Braziliji, Terphane, je, kot je navedeno zgoraj (uvodna izjava (22)), edini znani proizvajalec PET folije v Braziliji.
This company only exported a single consignment of 10,6 tonnes of PET film to the Community during the IP.
Ta družba je med OP izvozila eno samo pošiljko v obsegu 10,6 tone PET folije v Skupnost.
Apart from a sample sold in 2002, this was the company's first export of PET film to the Community.
Razen vzorca, prodanega leta 2002, je bil to prvi izvoz PET folije te družbe v Skupnost.
The company does not therefore appear to be responsible for the volumes of PET film entering the Community from Brazil in the period 2000 to 2003 (recital 23).
Zato družba verjetno ni odgovorna za obseg PET folije, ki je vstopila v Skupnost iz Brazilije v obdobju od 2000 do 2003 (uvodna izjava (23)).
The film supplied to the Community is manufactured by the company in facilities established before the entry into force of the measures on Indian PET film.
Folijo, dobavljeno v Skupnost, družba proizvaja v obratih, ustanovljenih pred začetkom veljavnosti ukrepov za indijsko PET folijo.
Thus, no change in the pattern of trade was found for this company.
Zato v zvezi s to družbo ni bila ugotovljena sprememba v vzorcu trgovanja.