natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘The third phase shall be extended by two years until 31 December 2006.
„Tretja faza se podaljša za dve leti, do 31. decembra 2006.
The financial framework for the implementation of this Regulation is hereby set at EUR 317,2 million. The budgetary authority shall authorise annual appropriations in the context of the annual budgetary procedure and within the limits of the applicable financial perspective.’;
Finančni okvir za izvajanje te uredbe je 317,2 milijonov EUR. Organ, pristojen za proračun, odobri letna proračunska sredstva v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka in v mejah veljavne finančne perspektive.“;
in paragraph 3, the second subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
v odstavku 3 se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘For the period 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2006, the accompanying measures shall be limited to 6 % of the available appropriations.’;
„Za obdobje od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2006 se spremljevalni ukrepi omejijo na 6 % razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev.“.
Article 9 shall be amended as follows:(a) in paragraph 1, the following subparagraph shall be added:
Člen 9 se spremeni, kakor sledi:(a) v odstavku 1 se doda naslednji pododstavek:
‘The Commission shall ensure that the results of all funded projects are disseminated to the general public and shall further demonstrate how the skills and experience gained may be reproduced elsewhere.’;
„Komisija zagotovi, da so rezultati vseh financiranih projektov na voljo širši javnosti, in nadalje na primerih pojasni, kako se lahko pridobljene sposobnosti in izkušnje uporabijo drugje.“;
The Commission shall publish annually a complete list of projects financed including a short description and a summary of funds expended in each case.’;
Komisija vsako leto objavi popolni seznam financiranih projektov skupaj s kratkim opisom in pregledom sredstev, porabljenih v posameznem primeru.“.
Article 11(2) shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 11(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporabljata člena 4 in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES ob upoštevanju določb člena 8 Sklepa.
The period referred to in Article 4(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.’
Obdobje iz člena 4(3) Sklepa 1999/468/ES je tri mesece.“.
Article 12 shall be replaced by the following:
Člen 12 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘Article 12
„Člen 12
Evaluation of the third phase and continuation of LIFE
Ocena tretje faze in nadaljevanje instrumenta LIFE
Not later than 30 September 2005, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council:
Najpozneje 30. septembra 2005 Komisija predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu:
a report updating the mid-term review submitted in November 2003 and evaluating the implementation of this Regulation, its contribution to the development of Community environmental policy, and the use made of the appropriations; and
poročilo o posodobitvi vmesnega pregleda, predloženega novembra 2003, in o oceni izvajanja te uredbe, njenega prispevka k razvoju okoljske politike Skupnosti ter uporabe dodeljenih sredstev in
if appropriate, a proposal for the further development of LIFE or a financial instrument exclusively in the environmental field that, inter alia, shall take account of the recommendations of the review of LIFE, to apply from 2007 onwards.
po potrebi predlog nadaljnjega razvoja LIFE ali finančnega instrumenta, ki zadeva izključno področje okolja, v katerem se med drugim upoštevajo priporočila pregleda LIFE, ki se uporabljajo od leta 2007 dalje.
Following the Commission's adoption of such a proposal, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the Treaty, shall decide no later than 1 May 2006 on the implementation of that financial instrument, as from 1 January 2007.
Ko Komisija sprejme takšen predlog, Evropski parlament in Svet v skladu s Pogodbo najpozneje 1. maja 2006 odločita o izvajanju tega finančnega instrumenta od 1. januarja 2007 dalje.
The amount needed within the financial framework to provide for monitoring and auditing measures in the period following 31 December 2006 shall be deemed to be confirmed only if it is consistent with the new financial perspectives commencing in 2007.’
Znesek, potreben v finančnem okviru za izvajanje ukrepov nadzora in revizije v obdobju po 31. decembru 2006, se šteje za potrjenega samo, če je v skladu z novo finančno perspektivo v veljavi od leta 2007.“.
Done at Strasbourg, 15 September 2004.
V Strasbourgu, 15. septembra 2004
OJ C 80, 30.3.2004, p. 57.
UL C 80, 30.3.2004, str. 57.
Opinion of the European Parliament of 21 April 2004 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Decision of the Council of 26 July 2004.
Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. aprila 2004 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 26. julija 2004.
OJ L 192, 28.7.2000, p. 1.
UL L 192, 28.7.2000, str. 1.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 788/2004 (OJ L 138, 30.4.2004, p. 17).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 788/2004 (UL L 138, 30.4.2004, str. 17).
OJ C 61, 10.3.2004, p. 1.
UL C 61, 10.3.2004, str. 1.
Case C-378/00 Commissionv European Parliament and Council [2003] ECR I-937.
Primer C-378/00, Komisija proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu [2003] PSES I-937.
Agreement as amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 25).
Sporazum, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2003/429/ES (UL L 147, 14.6.2003, str. 25).
OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.;’
UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str. 1.“;
OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p. 1.;’
UL L 242, 10.9.2002, str. 1.“;
Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1683/2004
imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China
o uvedbi dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 11(2) and 11(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske Skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in zlasti členov 11(2) in 11(3) Uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je vložila Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
In February 1998 the Council, by Regulation (EC) No 368/98 [2], imposed definitive anti-dumping measures (the original measures) in the form of a duty of 24 % on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China (the PRC).
Februarja 1998 je Svet z Uredbo (ES) št. 368/98 [2] uvedel dokončne protidampinške ukrepe („prvotni ukrepi“) v obliki dajatve 24 % na uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske („LRK“).
That Regulation was amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1086/2000 [3] which increased the duty to 48 % following an anti-absorption investigation pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation.
Ta uredba je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1086/2000 [3], ki je povišala dajatev na 48 %, po proti-absorpcijski preiskavi iz člena 12 osnovne uredbe.
Subsequently, following an anti-circumvention investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, Council Regulation (EC) No 163/2002 [4] extended the 48 % duty imposed on imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC to imports of glyphosate consigned from Malaysia and Taiwan (whether declared as originating in Malaysia or Taiwan or not), with the exception of those produced by one named company in each of these countries.
Po preiskavi proti izogibanju iz člena 13 osnovne uredbe, je nato Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 163/2002 [4] razširila dajatev 48 % na uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz LRK tudi na uvoz glifosata, poslanega iz Malezije in Tajvana (ne glede na to, ali je njegovo poreklo deklarirano v Maleziji oziroma Tajvanu ali ne), z izjemo glifosfata, ki ga proizvaja po eno imenovano podjetje v vsaki od teh dveh držav.
Initiation of expiry and interim review investigations
Začetek preiskav v zvezi s pregledom zaradi izteka ukrepa in v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom
Following the publication of the Notice of impending expiry of the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC [5], the Commission received on 18 November 2002, a request to review these measures pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation.
Po objavi obvestila o bližnjem izteku protidampinških ukrepov za uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz LRK [5] je Komisija 18. novembra 2002 prejela zahtevo po pregledu teh ukrepov v skladu s členom 11(2) osnovne uredbe.
The request was lodged by the European Glyphosate Association (EGA) (the applicant) on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in this case more than 90 %, of the total Community production of glyphosate.
Evropsko glifosatsko združenje (European Glyphosate Association – EGA) („vlagatelj“) je vložilo zahtevo v imenu proizvajalcev, ki predstavljajo večinski delež, v tem primeru več kot 90 %, skupne proizvodnje glifosata v Skupnosti.
The request was based on the grounds that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury to the Community industry.
Zahteva je temeljila na predvidevanju, da bi iztek ukrepov verjetno vodil v nadaljevanje ali ponovitev dampinga in škode industriji Skupnosti.
Moreover, on the basis of the evidence contained in the request, the Commission considered that the level of the measure was not sufficient to counteract the injurious dumping practices, which justified the ex officio initiation of a full interim review of the measures encompassing all aspects of the proceeding.
Poleg tega je Komisija na osnovi dokazov v zahtevi upoštevala, da stopnja ukrepov ni zadoščala za izravnavo škodljivih dampinških praks, kar je upravičilo začetek popolnega vmesnega pregleda ukrepov po uradni dolžnosti, ki je obsegal vse vidike postopka.
Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an expiry and an interim review pursuant to Articles 11(2) and 11(3) of the basic Regulation, the Commission published a Notice of initiation of these reviews in the Official Journal of the European Union [6].
Po posvetu s svetovalnim odborom in ugotovitvi, da obstajajo zadostni dokazi za začetek pregleda zaradi izteka ukrepa in vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členoma 11(2) in 11(3) osnovne uredbe, je Komisija objavila obvestilo o začetku teh pregledov v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [6].
Parties concerned by the investigations
Stranke, ki jih preiskavi zadevata
The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, the Chinese exporting producers, the producers, importers and users in the Community which were identified in the request as being concerned, as well as their associations, of the initiation of the investigations.
Komisija je uradno obvestila organe LRK, kitajske proizvajalce – izvoznike, proizvajalce, uvoznike in uporabnike v Skupnosti, ki so bili v zahtevi opredeljeni, pa tudi njihova združenja o začetku preiskav.
Interested parties were given an opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the Notice of initiation.
Zainteresiranim strankam je bila dana možnost pisno izraziti svoja stališča in zahtevati zaslišanje v roku, določenem v obvestilu o začetku.
In view of the apparent large number of exporting producers of the product concerned in the PRC, known from the request and from the previous investigation, the use of sampling techniques for the investigation of dumping was envisaged in the Notice of initiation.
Ker obstaja očitno veliko število proizvajalcev – izvoznikov zadevnega izdelka v LRK, kar je vidno iz zahteve in iz prejšnje preiskave, se je v obvestilu o začetku predvidevala tudi uporaba tehnik vzorčenja za preiskavo dampinga.
Additionally, the Commission sent sampling questionnaires to importers known to the Commission services.
Poleg tega je Komisija poslala vzorčne vprašalnike uvoznikom, za katere so službe Komisije vedele.
However, only a limited number of exporting producers from the PRC made themselves known and provided, within the prescribed time-limits, the information requested in the Notice of initiation.
Vendar pa se je predstavilo in v predvidenem roku priskrbelo informacije, zahtevane v obvestilu o začetku, le omejeno število proizvajalcev – izvoznikov iz LRK.
Therefore, the use of sampling techniques was not considered necessary insofar as exporting producers in the PRC were concerned.
Zato se uporaba tehnik vzorčenja pri proizvajalcih – izvoznikih iz LRK ni štela za potrebno.
Additionally, only one importer reported imports of glyphosate originating in the PRC.
Poleg tega je samo en uvoznik prijavil uvoz glifosata s poreklom iz LRK.
Therefore, the use of sampling techniques was not considered necessary as far as importers were concerned.
Zato se uporaba tehnik vzorčenja pri uvoznikih ni štela za potrebno.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the parties known to be concerned and received replies from four Community producers and two Chinese exporting producers.
Komisija je poslala vprašalnike strankam, za katere je znano, da jih to zadeva, in dobila odgovore od štirih proizvajalcev Skupnosti in dveh kitajskih proizvajalcev – izvoznikov.
One importer reported imports originating in the PRC and subsequently submitted a reply to a full questionnaire.
En uvoznik je prijavil uvoz s poreklom iz LRK in nato podal odgovore na celoten vprašalnik.
A number of exporting producers in the PRC, four producers and 13 suppliers located in the Community as well as an association of distributors and users, made their views known in writing.
Nekaj proizvajalcev – izvoznikov iz LRK, štirje proizvajalci in 13 dobaviteljev s sedežem v Skupnosti ter združenje distributerjev in uporabnikov so pisno izrazili svoja stališča.
All parties who so requested within the prescribed time limit and showed that there were particular reasons why they should be heard were granted the opportunity to be heard.
Vse stranke, ki so za to zaprosile v predvidenem roku in izkazale posebne razloge, zakaj bi jih bilo treba zaslišati, so to priložnost dobile.
The Commission sought and verified all information it deemed necessary for the determination of whether there was a likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injurious dumping and for the assessment of Community interest.
Komisija je poiskala in preverila vse informacije, ki so se ji zdeli potrebni za ugotovitev, ali je verjetno, da se bo škodljiv damping nadaljeval oziroma ponovil, in za oceno interesa Skupnosti.
Verification visits were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Opravljeni so bili preveritveni obiski v prostorih naslednjih podjetij:
Exporting producers in the PRC:
proizvajalci – izvozniki v LRK:
Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd, Xinanjiang, Jiande City, Zhejiang Province, the PRC;
Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd, Xinanjiang, mesto Jiande, pokrajina Zhejiang, LRK ;
Producers in the Community:
proizvajalci v Skupnosti:
Cheminova Agro A/S, Lemvig, Denmark
Cheminova Agro A/S, Lemvig, Danska
, (including also the related distributor Headland Agrochemicals Ltd, Great Chesterford, Essex, United Kingdom
, (tudi z njim povezani distributer Headland Agrochemicals Ltd, Great Chesterford, Essex, Združeno kraljestvo
Herbex Produtos Químicos, SA, Sintra, Portugal
Herbex Produtos Químicos, SA, Sintra, Portugalska
Monsanto Europe SA, Brussels and Antwerp, Belgium
Monsanto Europe SA, Bruselj in Antwerpen, Belgija
, (including also the related distributor Monsanto UK Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom
, (tudi z njim povezani distributer Monsanto UK Ltd, Cambridge, Združeno kraljestvo
Syngenta UK, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
Syngenta UK, Huddersfield, Združeno kraljestvo
(including also the related companies: Stauffer Chemical BV, Seneffe, Belgium
(tudi z njim povezani podjetji: Stauffer Chemical BV, Seneffe, Belgija
and Syngenta Supply AG, Basel, Switzerland
in Syngenta Supply AG, Basel, Švica
, and the related distributor Syngenta Crop Protection, Whittlesford, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
, in z njim povezani distributer Syngenta Crop Protection, Whittlesford, Cambridgeshire, Združeno kraljestvo
Producer in the market economy third country:
proizvajalec v tretji državi s tržnim gospodarstvom:
Monsanto do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil
Monsanto do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazilija
The investigation into the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping in the review investigations covered the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 (the IP).
Preiskava o verjetnosti, da se damping nadaljuje ali ponovi v okviru preiskav o pregledih, je pokrila obdobje od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2002 („obdobje preiskave“ – OP).
The examination of trends in the context of the analysis of the likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of injury covered the period from January 1999 to the end of the IP (the analysis period).
Preučitev trendov v smislu analize o verjetnosti, da se škoda nadaljuje ali ponovi, je pokrila obdobje od januarja 1999 do konca OP („analizno obdobje“).
Market economy treatment (MET) and individual treatment
Obravnava tržnega gospodarstva in individualna obravnava
Pursuant to Article 2(7)(b) of the basic Regulation, two Chinese companies, Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd (Xinanchem) and Zhenjiang Jiagnan Chemical Factory (Zhenjiang), requested MET and individual treatment.
V skladu s členom 2(7)(b) osnovne uredbe sta dve kitajski podjetji, Zhejiang Xinan Industrial Group Ltd („Xinanchem“) in Zhenjiang Jiagnan Chemical Factory („Zhenjiang“) zahtevali obravnavo tržnega gospodarstva in individualno obravnavo.
However, it was found that Zhenjiang had no exports of the product concerned into the Community during the IP.
Vendar pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da Zhenjiang ni izvažal zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost v OP.
Therefore, the request for MET and individual treatment of Zhenjiang became irrelevant.
Zato je zahteva po obravnavi tržnega gospodarstva in po individualni obravnavi podjetja Zhenjiang postala nepomembna.
Xinanchem was required to complete a MET claim form detailing all the relevant information required.
Xinanchem je moral izpolniti zahtevek za obravnavo tržnega gospodarstva in natančno opredeliti vse zahtevane pomembne informacije.
Although the majority of the shares of the company were owned by private persons, due to the wide dispersion of the non State-owned shares, together with that fact that the State owned by far the biggest block of shares, the company was found to be under State control.
Čeprav je bila večina delnic podjetja v lasti posameznikov, je bilo zaradi velike razpršenosti delnic, ki niso bile v državni lasti, in dejstva, da je daleč največji delež delnic v državni lasti, ugotovljeno, da je podjetje pod državnim nadzorom.
Moreover, the board of directors was in fact appointed by the State shareholders and the majority of the directors of the board were either State officials or officials of State-owned enterprises.
Poleg tega so upravni odbor imenovali državni delničarji in večina članov odbora je državnih uradnikov ali uslužbencev podjetij v državni lasti.
Therefore, it was determined that the company was under a significant State control and influence.
Zato je bilo zaključeno, da je podjetje pod znatnim državnim nadzorom in vplivom.
Moreover, it was established that the government of the PRC had entrusted the China Chamber of Commerce Metals, Minerals & Chemicals Importers and Exporters (CCCMC) with the right of contract stamping and verifying export prices for customs clearance.
Poleg tega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je vlada LRK dodelila Kitajski gospodarski zbornici uvoznikov in izvoznikov kovin, rud in kemikalij (KGZKRK) pravico do žigosanja pogodb in preverjanja izvoznih cen za carinjenje.
This system included the setting of a minimum price for glyphosate exports and it allowed the CCCMC to veto exports that did not respect these prices.
Sistem je vseboval tudi vzpostavitev minimalne cene za izvoz glifosata in omogočal zbornici veto na izvoz, če se teh cen ni upoštevalo.
Consequently, after consulting the Advisory Committee, it was decided not to grant MET to Xinanchem on the basis that the company did not meet all the criteria set in Article 2(7)(c) of the basic Regulation.
Posledično je bila po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom sprejeta odločitev, da se Xinanchem ne obravnava po sistemu tržnega gospodarstva, ker podjetje ni ustrezalo kriterijem iz člena 2(7)(c) osnovne uredbe.
As Xinanchem was not granted market economy status, the company applied for individual treatment, i.e. the determination of an individual dumping margin on the basis of its individual export prices.
Podjetje Xinanchem ni dobilo status tržnega gospodarstva, zato je zaprosilo za individualno obravnavo, tj. za določitev individualne stopnje dampinga na osnovi individualnih izvoznih cen podjetja.
The Commission verified whether this company enjoyed, both in fact and in law, the necessary degree of independence from the State for setting its export price.
Komisija je preverila, če ima podjetje pri postavljanju svoje izvozne cene tako v praksi kot po zakonu potrebno stopnjo neodvisnosti od države.
In this respect, it was established that Xinanchem was subject to significant State control with regard to setting of its export prices of the product concerned as explained in recital 14.
Pri tem je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Xinanchem podvržen precejšnjemu državnemu nadzoru pri postavljanju izvoznih cen za zadevni izdelek, kar pojasnjuje uvodna izjava (14) zgoraj.
It was, therefore, concluded that Xinanchem did not meet the necessary requirements for individual treatment as set in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato je bil sprejet zaključek, da Xinanchem ni ustrezal zahtevanim pogojem za individualno obravnavo, kot to določa člen 9(5) osnovne uredbe.
The product concerned is glyphosate originating in the PRC (the product concerned), currently classifiable within CN codes ex29310095 (TARIC codes 2931009581 and 2931009582) and ex38083027 (TARIC codes 3808302711 and 3808302719).
Zadevni izdelek je glifosat s poreklom iz LRK („zadevni izdelek“), ki se ga trenutno klasificira z oznakama KN ex29310095 (oznaki TARIC 2931009581 in 2931009582) in ex38083027 (oznaki TARIC 3808302711 in 3808302719).
The product concerned is the same as in the investigation leading to the imposition of the original measures (the original investigation).
Zadevni izdelek je isti kot v preiskavi, ki je privedla do uvedbe prvotnih ukrepov („prvotna preiskava“).
Glyphosate is a non-selective herbicide which can exist in different grades or forms of concentration of which the main ones are acid, salt and formulated product.
Glifosat je neselektivni herbicid, ki lahko obstaja v različnih stopnjah ali oblikah koncentracije, predvsem kot kisline, soli in formulirani izdelki.
Acid is the basic form of the chemical resulting from the manufacture process and is usually found as a dry powder, with 95 % glyphosate content, or as wet cake, with 84 % glyphosate content, the difference being due only to the moisture content remaining.
Kislina je osnovna oblika kemične spojine, ki nastane pri proizvodnem postopku, in je ponavadi v obliki suhega prahu z vsebnostjo 95 % glifosata ali v obliki mokrega kolača z vsebnostjo 84 % glifosata. Razlika v vsebnosti glifosata je posledica vsebnosti vlage.
Salt is a soluble form of glyphosate which is made from acid.
Sol je topljiva oblika glifosata, ki se pridobiva iz kisline.
It is a liquid, normally containing 62 % IPA salt [7] content which is equivalent to a glyphosate content of 43 %.
Je tekoče oblike, ponavadi vsebuje 62 % soli IPA [7], kar je enako vsebnosti 43 % glifosata.