natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concerning the return to viability, Powergen submits that the scenarios taken into account by the UK authorities to assert BE’s future viability are too optimistic, in particular as regards the availability of BE’s plants as compared to past benchmark.
V zvezi s ponovno vzpostavitvijo preživetja družba Powergen trdi, da so scenariji, ki jih obravnavajo organi Združenega kraljestva, da bi zagotovili prihodnjo donosnost družbe BE, preveč optimistični, še zlasti v zvezi z razpoložljivostjo elektrarn BE v primerjavi s preteklimi merili.
Finally, Powergen considers that ‘it is well established that the state aid rules contained in the EC Treaty apply to the nuclear industry, notwithstanding the existence of the Euratom Treaty’.
Končno družba Powergen upošteva, da „je bilo ugotovljeno, da veljajo pravila o državni pomoči iz Pogodbe ES za jedrsko industrijo, ne glede na obstoj Pogodbe Euratom“.
They refer to the same 1990 case as the one referred to by Greenpeace.
Sklicujejo se na isti primer iz leta 1990, na katerega se je sklicevala organizacija Greenpeace.
InterGen is a global power generation firm, with activities in all continents.
Družba InterGen je globalna proizvajalka energije, dejavna na vseh celinah.
It has a 2 % share of the generation capacity in England and Wales, with two plants operating and one in construction (BE has 14 %).
Njen delež proizvodne zmogljivosti je 2 % v Angliji in Walesu, z dvema delujočima elektrarnama in enim v gradnji (delež družbe BE je 14 %).
It sells most of its electricity to the wholesale market, and a part of it through long term contracts.
Največ elektrike proda trgu na debelo in del te elektrike po dolgoročnih pogodbah.
It is also active in the gas trading market.
Dejavna je tudi na trgu s plinom.
It is jointly owned by Shell and Bechtel.
Je v skupni lasti družb Shell in Bechtel.
Intergen submits that there is security of supply concern in the United Kingdom, and that nuclear safety could be managed by company receivers.
Družba Intergen trdi, da je v Združenem kraljestvu zaskrbljenost v zvezi z zanesljivo oskrbo in da bi lahko jedrsko varnost upravljali stečajni upravitelji družbe.
They draw the Commission's attention to the fact that aid to BE has been and is damaging InterGen, and to the fact that other InterGen competitors, like Teeside Power Limited, which are among BE creditors, are also favoured as compared to InterGen within the framework of the restructuring plan.
Pozornost Komisije usmerjajo na dejstvo, da je pomoč družbi BE škodovala družbi InterGen in mu še vedno škoduje, ter na dejstvo, da so drugi tekmeci družbe InterGen, kot je podjetje Teeside Power Limited, ki je med upniki družbe BE, tudi privilegirani v primerjavi z družbo InterGen v okviru načrta za prestrukturiranje.
InterGen submits that, should the Commission authorise the aid, it and its affiliate should be compensated for the damage they suffer.
Družba InterGen trdi, da mora njej in njeni podružnici pripadati odškodnina za utrpelo škodo, če bo Komisija odobrila to pomoč.
First third party wishing to remain anonymous
Prva tretja stranka, ki želi ostati anonimna
This third party submits that earlier press reports suggest a reprocessing price prior to BE’s restructuring of some GBP 1000/kg heavy metal (HM).
Ta tretja stranka trdi, da zgodnejša tiskovna poročila napovedujejo ceno predelave pred prestrukturiranjem družbe BE na približno 1000 GBP/kg težke kovine (v nadaljevanju TK).
Following BE’s restructuring a price of some GBP 150/kg HM has been agreed between BNFL and BE, which is 85 % below the original agreement.
V skladu s ceno predelave družbe BE sta se družbi BNFL in BE sporazumeli za ceno 150 GBP/kg TK, kar je 85 % manj od začetnega dogovora.
It adds that the initial reprocessing contracts between BNFL and BE were prices at cost plus value, which means that the baseload customers could by contract obtain reprocessing only if they accepted (pro rata) assumption of full costs of reprocessing plus a profit mark up.
Dodaja, da so bile pri prvotnih pogodbah o predelavi med družbama BNFL in BE navedene stroškovne cene, kar pomeni, da lahko strankam z osnovno obremenitvijo po pogodbi pripadala predelava le, če so pristale na (sorazmeren) prevzem vseh stroškov predelave plus pribitek dobička.
Against this background, if the reprocessing costs agreed with the baseload customers cover costs only at the level of GBP 1000/kg HM, this means that the new price now agreed with BE cannot in any way come near to covering costs.
Proti tej predpostavki, če stroški predelave, ki jih pokrivajo stranke za osnovno obremenitev, vključujejo le stroške 1000 GBP/kg TK, to pomeni, da nova cena, zdaj dogovorjena z družbo BE, ne more na noben način niti približno pokriti stroškov.
Even in the case of new contracts, the price amounts to GBP 1000/kg HM (prices as at 2003).
Celo v primeru novih pogodb je cena do 1000 GBP/kg TK (cene leta 2003).
It concludes that these prices indicate that BNFL has not acted as a private investor in a market economy in its negotiations with BE, unless BNFL would be willing to extend these favourable conditions to other customers.
Ugotovi, da glede na te cene družba BNFL pri svojih pogajanjih z BE ni ravnala kot zasebni vlagatelj v tržno gospodarstvo, razen če bi družba BNFL bila pripravljena ponuditi te ugodne pogoje tudi drugim strankam.
Drax is the largest coal-fired electricity generator in Western Europe.
Družba Drax je največja proizvajalka električne energije na premog v Zahodni Evropi.
It was previously part of the AES Corporation, a US based energy group with interests in generation, distribution, and supply of electricity throughout the world.
V preteklosti je bila del družbe AES Corporation, energetske družbe s sedežem v ZDA, ki je udeležena pri proizvajanju, distribuciji in oskrbi z elektriko po vsem svetu.
On 5 August AES Corporation ceded control of Drax to its creditors.
avgusta je družba AES Corporation predala nadzorovanje družbe Drax svojim upnikom.
On 30 August 2003, Drax announced that it had entered into an exclusive arrangement with International Power plc to participate in the restructuring of Drax.
avgusta 2003 je družba Drax napovedala, da je z družbo International Power plc sklenila izključni sporazum za sodelovanje pri prestrukturiranju družbe Drax.
According to DRAX, Measures A, B and G all constitute state aid in the sense of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Družba DRAX meni, da sestavljajo ukrepi A, B in G državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
DRAX agrees that Measures D, E and F do not constitute state aid.
Družba DRAX se strinja, da ukrepi D, E in F ne sestavljajo državne pomoči.
DRAX is of the view that the amount of aid is difficult to estimate.
Družba DRAX meni, da je težko določiti višino pomoči.
As regards Measure A, DRAX believes that its amount could be considerably greater than currently estimated in particular due to the fact that decommissioning liabilities are uncharted in the United Kingdom and that it is unlikely that BE would contribute to the nuclear liabilities costs.
V zvezi z ukrepom A meni družba DRAX, da bi njegova vsota lahko bila znatno višja od sedaj ocenjene še zlasti zaradi dejstva, da obveznosti razgradnje v Združenem kraljestvu niso nikjer določene in tega, da je malo verjetno, da bi družba BE prispevala k stroškom jedrskih obveznosti.
The UK Government will always remain ultimately responsible for the back-end and decommissioning liabilities.
Vlada Združenega kraljestva bo vedno ostala popolnoma odgovorna za obveznosti hrbtnega dela proizvodnje in obveznosti razgradnje.
The UK government will never allow BE to fail.
Vlada Združenega kraljestva ne bo nikoli dopustila, da družbi BE spodleti.
DRAX is of the opinion that the tax disregard itself should be notified as aid.
Družba DRAX meni, da bi se že sama oprostitev davka morala šteti kot pomoč.
Measures B and C
Ukrepa B in C
DRAX believed concerning the re-negotiation of contracts with BNFL that no private investor would ever have agreed such uncommercial terms committing it to significant present and future losses, irrespective of the hardship clause and the fact that BE is its largest customer.
Družba DRAX je v zvezi s ponovnim pogajanjem o pogodbah z družbo BNFL prepričana, da ne bi noben zasebni vlagatelj nikoli pristal na takšne neposlovne pogoje, zaradi katerih bi utrpel znatne sedanje in prihodnje izgube, ne glede na klavzulo o finančnih težavah in dejstvo, da je družba BE njegova največja stranka.
It is clear that the re-negotiation severely disadvantaged BNFL’s position.
Jasno je, da so ponovna pogajanja znatno poslabšala položaj družbe BNFL.
It will lead to a reduction of the fixed annual payment in respect of fuel supply agreement of between GBP 5 million and GBP 20 million per year.
Zaradi tega se bo fiksno letno izplačilo v zvezi z dogovorom o dobavi goriva zmanjšalo za 5 do 20 milijonov GBP na leto.
This view is confirmed by BNFL’s 2004 Accounts report.
To mnenje potrjuje tudi knjigovodsko poročilo družbe BNFL za leto 2004.
Besides it appears that even if BE had to be placed under administration, BE plants would continue to operate and have the same need for the supply of fuel as well as management services, processing and disposal of that fuel after it has been used.
Razen tega se zdi, da bi elektrarne BE, tudi če bi bilo treba družbo BE prepustiti stečajnemu upravitelju, še naprej delovale ter bi imele iste potrebe po dobavi goriva in tudi upravljanju storitev, obdelavi in odstranjevanju tega goriva, ko bi se izrabilo.
The question should then be whether the administrator would have been able to extract those terms from BNFL.
Potem bi se moralo postaviti vprašanje, ali bi bil upravljavec zmožen izpolniti takšne pogoje kot družba BNFL.
In addition, BNFL could pursue other business opportunities if its business with BE were to be reduced.
Razen tega bi lahko družba BNFL izkoristila kakšne druge poslovne priložnosti, če bi se njen obseg poslov z družbo BE zmanjšal.
BNFL is not organised on the basis of the market investor principle.
Družba BNFL ni organizirana na podlagi načela tržnega vlagatelja.
Consequently Measure B is state aid.
Zato je Ukrep B državna pomoč.
DRAX is of the opinion that the BNFL standstill agreement contained in Measure C also constitutes state aid since BNFL does not receive interest during the standstill period unlike the other participating creditors.
Družba DRAX meni, da dogovor družbe BNFL o odlogu plačil, ki ga vsebuje ukrep C, sestavlja tudi državno pomoč, ker družba BNFL ne prejema obresti v obdobju odloga plačil za razliko od drugih udeleženih upnikov.
Compatibility of the aid measure
Združljivost ukrepa pomoči
Drax further commented on the compatibility of the aid package.
Družba Drax je še dodatno razpravljala o združljivosti paketa pomoči.
DRAX does not question the fact that BE is a firm in difficulty.
Družba DRAX ne dvomi, da je družba BE težavah.
However it is of the opinion that BE’s unhedged position was entirely due to a curious decision on the part of its management to sell its retail business.
Vseeno meni, da je za nezavarovan položaj družbe BE v celoti kriva nenavadna odločitev njene uprave, da proda svoje maloprodajno podjetje.
Besides, BE could have reduced its costs by closing some or all of its plants as it is more expensive to run some nuclear plants than it is to temporarily close them
Razen tega bi družba BE lahko zmanjšala svoje stroške z zaprtjem nekaterih elektrarn ali vseh, ker je dražje upravljati nekatere jedrske elektrarne, kot pa jih začasno zapreti.
Concerning the restoration of viability, DRAX is of the opinion that the proposed plan is not a real restructuring plan.
V zvezi s ponovno vzpostavitvijo sposobnosti preživetja meni družba DRAX, da predlagani načrt ni pravi načrt za prestrukturiranje.
Furthermore, BE is and will always be in a different position from its competitors.
Ob tem je družba BE v drugačnem položaju kot njegovi tekmeci in bo v njem tudi vedno ostala.
It will continue to generate power and sell into the market at any price and will exert a permanent downward pressure on price to the detriment of all other competitors.
Še naprej bo proizvajala energijo in jo prodajala na trg po kakršni koli ceni ter bo izvajala stalen pritisk navzdol na ceno v škodo vseh drugih tekmecev.
DRAX objects to the UK Government’s use of SRMCs as the proper measure of the viability of BE.
Družba DRAX ugovarja uporabi KMS kot primernega ukrepa za ponovno vzpostavitev sposobnosti preživetja družbe BE.
The restructuring relieves BE of the liabilities for the major costs of a nuclear generator.
Prestrukturiranje razrešuje družbo BE obveznosti za večje stroške jedrskega proizvajalca.
A company’s decision on whether or not to enter a particular market or indeed to continue to compete in that market will be based on whether it can, over a reasonable period, meet its average costs, plus realise a reasonable return on its investment.
Odločitev podjetja o morebitnem vstopu na določen trg ali resničnem nadaljevanju konkuriranja na tem trgu bo temeljila na tem, ali lahko, v razumnem obdobju, pokrije svoje povprečne stroške plus uresniči primeren donos naložbe.
This is not the case of BE, which has all the commercial risk removed from it.
Pri družbi BE ne gre za to, ker so pri njej odstranjena vsa poslovna tveganja.
Concerning the duration of the aid, DRAX is of the opinion that the funding of open-ended liabilities so far into the future is not compatible with the guidelines.
V zvezi s trajanjem pomoči meni družba DRAX, da financiranje obveznosti za tako daleč vnaprej ni v skladu s Smernicami.
It also argued that ongoing operational aid cannot be considered to be limited to the minimum necessary.
Dokazovala je tudi, da stalna operativna pomoč ne more biti omejena na najnižji potrebni znesek.
Furthermore, as regards BE’s own contribution, DRAX notes that there is an uncertainty about the proceeds of the sale of assets and that BE’s contribution to the NLF derives from aided cash flow which cannot be taken into account.
Ob tem družba DRAX, v zvezi z lastnim prispevkom družbe BE, ugotavlja, da obstaja negotovost v zvezi s postopki prodaje premoženja in da izhaja prispevek BE v sklad za jedrske obveznosti iz denarnega toka od pomoči, kar pa ne more biti upoštevano.
Distortion of competition
Izkrivljanje konkurence
On the issue of over-capacity and compensation to creditors, DRAX notes that the capacity margin of 20 % quoted in the decision to initiate the procedure only concerns winter peak demand.
V zvezi s presežnimi zmogljivostmi in nadomestilom upnikom družba DRAX ugotavlja, da velja meja zmogljivosti 20 %, navedena v sklepu, le za največje povpraševanje v zimskem času.
According to the NGC, the capacity margin over average peak winter demand is 20,3 %.
Po mnenju NGC je meja zmogljivosti za 20,3 % nad povprečnim povpraševanjem v zimskem času.
According to DRAX, it would be a rational approach for any operator of BE to close down a proportion of generating capacity during the summer months.
Družba DRAX meni, da bi bilo za kateri koli obrat družbe BE razumno, da v poletnih mesecih zapre del proizvodnih zmogljivosti.
This would result in a net saving.
To bi prineslo neto prihranek.
DRAX believes that there are a number of compensatory measures and/or amendments to the restructuring plan which would go some way to ensure that the restructuring is in accordance with the guidelines and offers compensations for unaided competitors.
Družba DRAX meni, da so številni izravnalni ukrepi in/ali spremembe za načrt za prestrukturiranje, ki bi nekako zagotovili, da je načrt za prestrukturiranje v skladu s Smernicami, in ponuja tekmecem, ki ne prejemajo pomoči, nadomestila.
DRAX proposes the following:
Družba DRAX predlaga:
removing BE from the competitive market by creating a system of compulsory purchase of nuclear energy at a fixed price that would be similar to the Renewable Obligation.
umik družbe BE s konkurenčnega trga z vzpostavitvijo sistema obveznega nakupa jedrske energije po fiksni ceni, ki bi bil podoben obveznosti proizvodnje energije iz obnovljivih virov energije.
BE can never be properly restructured to allow it to compete on the merits with non-aided market participants.
Družba BE ne more biti nikoli ustrezno prestrukturirana, da bi lahko samostojno tekmovala z udeleženci na trgu, ki ne prejemajo pomoči.
The best solution if BE generation cannot be withdrawn from the market is that BE’s output be partitioned from the competitive market.
Če se družba BE kot proizvajalka ne more umakniti s trga, je najboljša rešitev, da se proizvodnja BE loči od konkurenčnega trga.
The price of the nuclear generated electricity would need to be regulated and could be set according to cost of capital and other traditional price regulation parameters.
Cena jedrsko proizvedene energije bi morala biti urejena ter bi lahko bila postavljena glede na stroške kapitala in drugih tradicionalnih parametrov za uravnavanje cen.
This would meet the UK government’s concerns regarding security of supply and nuclear safety and there would no longer be any distortion of competition;
S tem pa bi se upoštevali pomisleki vlade Združenega kraljestva v zvezi z oskrbo in jedrsko varnostjo ter ne bi bilo več nobenega izkrivljanja konkurence;
reducing the term and re-balancing the risk of BNFL contracts in favour of BNFL;
zmanjšanje pogojev in ponovno uravnoteženje tveganja pogodb družbe BNFL v korist družbe BNFL;
divesting of Eggborough;
odvzem elektrarne Eggborough;
banning further acquisitions or acting as market leader;
prepoved nadaljnjih prevzemov ali delovanja kot vodilnega na trgu;
obtaining a commitment of the UK Government on the one time last time principle.
ohranitev obveznosti vlade Združenega kraljestva na načelu prvič in zadnjič.
Relationship between the Euratom and the EC Treaty
Odnos med Pogodbo Euratom in Pogodbo ES
DRAX also commented on the relationship with the Euratom Treaty.
Družba DRAX je govorila tudi o odnosu med Pogodbo Euratom in Pogodbo ES.
DRAX is of the opinion that the EC and the Euratom Treaties pursue complementary rather than conflicting objectives.
Družba DRAX meni, da si Pogodba ES in Pogodba Euratom prizadevata za dosego dopolnjujočih in ne nasprotujočih ciljev.
Other interested parties
Druge zainteresirane stranke
Comments were also introduced by the Trade Unionists for Safe Nuclear Energy (within a Balanced Energy Policy) – TUSNE [19], Mr Robert Freer [20], the UK Chemical Industries Association (CIA) [21], John Hall Associates (JHA) [22], the Energy Intensive Users Group (EIUG) [23], Terra Nitrogen [24], Energywatch [25], Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) [26], National Grid Transco [27], the Royal Academy of Engineering [28], Enfield Energy Centre Limited (EECL) [29], the Energy Information Centre Ltd (EIC) [30], Major Energy Users’ Council Ltd (MEUC) [31] and a second third party willing to remain anonymous.
Mnenja so dali tudi: Trade Unionists for Safe Nuclear Energy (na podlagi uravnotežene energetske politike) – TUSNE [19], g. Robert Freer [20], UK Chemical Industries Association („CIA“) [21], John Hall Associates („JHA“) [22], Energy Intensive Users Group („EIUG“) [23], Terra Nitrogen [24], Energywatch [25], Teollisuuden Voima Oy („TVO“) [26], National Grid Transco [27], Royal Academy of Engineering [28], Enfield Energy Centre Limited („EECL“) [29], Energy Information Centre Ltd („EIC“) [30], Major Energy Users' Council Ltd („MEUC“) [31] in druga tretja stranka, ki želi ostati anonimna.
TUSNE, Robert Freer, CIA, JHA, EUIG, Terra Nitrogen, EIC and MEUC are all concerned about the security of supply in the United Kingdom and submit that closing down BE’s nuclear plants would create the risk of power cuts and be contrary to consumers’ interests.
TUSNE, Robert Freer, CIA, JHA, EUIG, Terra Nitrogen, EIC in MEUC so zaskrbljeni v zvezi z zanesljivostjo oskrbe v Združenem kraljestvu ter trdijo, da bi zaprtje jedrskih elektrarn družbe BE ustvarilo tveganje izpadov električne energije in bilo v nasprotju z interesi potrošnikov.
Some of them also stress that the withdrawal of BE’s nuclear plants would make the United Kingdom’s commitment under the Kyoto Protocol very difficult to achieve since they participate in the diversity of power supply.
Nekateri od njih tudi poudarjajo, da bi z umikom jedrskih elektrarn bilo zelo težko doseči izpolnitev obveznosti iz Kjotskega protokola, ker prispevajo k raznolikosti oskrbe z električno energijo.
They submit that the cost to the economy of allowing BE to fail would far outweigh the price of its restructuring and that the aid is necessary.
Trdijo, da bi stroški za gospodarstvo, ki bi dovolilo propad družbe BE, znatno presegli stroške njenega prestrukturiranja in da je potrebna pomoč.
The anonymous third party submits that BE is using the State support in order to aggressively gain market share at dumped prices.
Anonimna tretja stranka trdi, da uporablja družba BE državno podporo za agresivno pridobivanje tržnega deleža po dampinških cenah.
It quotes cases where BE allegedly offered prices 10 to 15 % below competition.
Navaja primere, v katerih naj bi BE ponujala 10 do 15 % nižje cene od konkurence.
It submits that such offers could not be sustained without State backing, and can therefore not be claimed to restore the company's viability.
Trdi, da ne bi bilo mogoče dajati takšnih ponudb brez pomoči države in da se zato ni mogoče sklicevati na ponovno vzpostavitev sposobnosti preživetja družbe.
TVO submits that it should not be inferred from the difficulties undergone by BE that nuclear power cannot be competitive in a liberalised electricity market.
TVO trdi, da se na podlagi težav družbe BE ne sme sklepati, da jedrska energija ne more biti konkurenčna na liberaliziranem trgu z električno energijo.
National Grid Transco submits that the present capacity margin in England and Wales is smaller than originally foreseen, and cannot be considered as structural overcapacity.
National Grid Transco trdi, da je sedanja meja zmogljivosti v Angliji in Walesu manjša, kot je bilo na začetku predvideno, in se ne more šteti za strukturni presežek.
National Grid Transco refers to 20 % security margin as the level above which one may consider there to be overcapacity.
National Grid Transco navaja varnostno mejo 20 % kot raven, nad katero se lahko upošteva, da gre za presežek.
National Grid Transco foresees that the security margin will be below 20 % until at least 2006, in an optimistic scenario.
National Grid Transco predvideva, da bo varnostna meja, po optimističnem scenariju, vsaj do leta 2006 pod 20 %.
Pessimistic scenarios would see security always below 20 %, even declining to 8,5 % in 2009.
Po pesimističnih scenarijih bi varnost vedno bila pod 20 %, leta 2009 bi se celo znižala na 8,5 %.
National Grid Transco concludes that if any plant closure was to be requested as a compensatory measure, it would need to be communicated to the markets well in advance (three to four years) in order to allow the market to compensate for it.
National Grid Transco ugotavlja, da je treba, če se zahteva kot izravnalni ukrep zaprtje katere koli elektrarne, o tem obvestiti trge daleč vnaprej (3–4 leta), da bi se lahko trg na to zaprtje pripravil.
EECL submits that all electricity generators (not only BE) have been hit by low wholesale electricity prices in the United Kingdom.
EECL trdi, da so vse proizvajalce električne energije (ne le družbe BE) prizadele nizke veleprodajne cene v Združenem kraljestvu.
EECL disputes the UK authorities’ view that SRMC should be the benchmark to establish the distortive effect of the aid, as these costs do not reflect a plant’s medium to long term viability.
EECL nasprotuje mnenju organov Združenega kraljestva, da bi KMS morali biti merilo za vzpostavitev izkrivljenega učinka pomoči, ker ti stroški ne kažejo sredstva elektrarne za dolgoročno preživetje.
EECL submits that low forward market prices are the best indicator that there is structural overcapacity on the market.
EECL trdi, da so nizke cene za terminsko dobavo najboljši pokazatelj, da je na trgu strukturni presežek.
COMMENTS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM ON THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS
PRIPOMBE IZ ZDRUŽENEGA KRALJESTVA V ZVEZI S SPROŽITVIJO POSTOPKOV
Measure G
Ukrep G