natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Even if the approach taken by the Italian authorities of compensating for a loss caused by adverse weather could have been considered valid, there are too many grey areas in the explanations provided by those authorities for the Commission to be able to consider that the aid had been granted in compliance with point 11.3 of the guidelines.
Tudi če bi lahko štela ravnanje italijanskih organov v zvezi z odškodnino za izgubo, ki naj bi nastala zaradi vremenskih razmer, kot veljavno, so razlage omenjenih organov preveč nepopolne, da bi Komisija lahko potrdila, da je bila pomoč dodeljena v skladu z določili iz člena 11.3 usmeritev.
From this point of view, therefore, the aid could not have qualified for the derogation provided for in Article 87(2)(b) of the Treaty relied on by the Italian authorities, or for that provided for in Article 87(3)(c), since it would not have contributed to facilitating the development of the sector.
S tega vidika namreč za pomoč ne bi smele veljati niti odstopanja v smislu člena 87(2)(b) Pogodbe, na katero so se sklicevali italijanski organi, niti izjeme iz člena 87(3)(c), glede na to, da ne bi prispevala k razvoju sektorja.
It would have been incompatible, therefore, with the common market.
Pomoč bi bila torej nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
There remains, lastly, the presumption of an infringement of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96.
Slednjič obstaja tudi sum o domnevni kršitvi predpisov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 2200/96.
Since withdrawal took place at a time when the withdrawal possibilities for the producer organisations in Piedmont had been exhausted, the grant of aid to finance an operation that goes beyond the limits set in a regulation designed to govern the market in fruit and vegetables at European level would risk disturbing the smooth operation of that market.
Ker je prišlo do umika v trenutku, ko so organizacije proizvajalcev iz Piemonta že izrabile vse možnosti umika, bi pomenila odobritev pomoči, s katero bi financirali ukrep, ki presega možnosti, določene z uredbo o ureditvi trga sadja in zelenjave na evropskem nivoju, motnjo pri urejenem delovanju navedenega trga.
According to point 3.2 of the guidelines the Commission cannot under any circumstances approve an aid that is incompatible with the provisions governing a common organisation of the market or which would interfere with the proper functioning of the common organisation.
Skladno s točko 3.2 usmeritev Komisija ne more v nobenem primeru odobriti pomoči, ki ni v skladu z določbami o skupni ureditvi trga ali bi nanjo moteče vplivala.
The aid must be regarded therefore as incompatible with the common market.
Šteje se, da pomoč ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Commission need not require recovery of the aid since it has not been paid,
Ni potrebno, da Komisija naloži vračilo pomoči, saj ta ni bila nakazana –
The State aid amounting to EUR 108752 which Italy is planning to implement in order to help cope with the difficulties facing the cultivation of peaches in the region of Piedmont is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v znesku 108752 EUR, ki jo namerava Italija dodeliti zaradi reševanja kriznih razmer pri gojenju breskev v deželi Piemonte, ni združljiva s skupnim trgom.
The aid in question cannot therefore be implemented.
Izvrševanje te pomoči se ne odobri.
Italy will inform the Commission, within two months of the date of notification of this decision, of the measures that have been taken to comply with it.
V dveh mesecih od objave te odločbe Italija obvesti Komisijo o sprejetih ukrepih za prilagoditev kriterijem.
OJ C 266, 5.11.2003, p. 3.
UL C 266, 5.11.2003, str. 3.
According to the information provided by the Italian authorities, two producer organisations applied for assistance, Asprofrut and Lagnasco Group.
Glede na informacije, ki so jih posredovali italijanski organi, sta dve organizaciji proizvajalcev predložili vlogo za pomoč: Asprofrut in Lagnasco Group.
The latter later withdrew its application.
Slednja je kasneje od namere odstopila.
Republished in full, following amendment, in OJ C 232, 12.8.2000, p. 17.
V celoti so bili ponovno objavljeni po popravkih v UL C 232, 12.8.2000, str. 19.
Point 11.3.2. of the guidelines.
Točka 11.3.2. usmeritev.
See footnote 4.
Gl. opombo 4.
on restructuring aid implemented by France for Compagnie Marseille Réparation (CMR) — State aid C34/03 (ex N 728/02)
o pomoči, ki jo dodeljuje Francija podjetju Compagnie Marseille Réparation (CMR) (državna pomoč C 34/03 (prej N 728/02))
(notified under document number C(2004) 3350)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 3350)
(Only the French version is authentic)
(Besedilo v francoskem jeziku je edino verodostojno.)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provisions cited above [1],
po povabilu zainteresiranim strankam k predložitvi njihovih pripomb na podlagi zgoraj navedenih določb [1],
By letter dated 18 November 2002 and registered as received on the same date (hereinafter referred to as the notification), France notified the Commission that it intended to provide financial support for the ship repair yard Compagnie Marseille Réparation (CMR).
Z dopisom z dne 18. novembra 2002, katerega prejem je bil registriran na isti dan (v nadaljnjem besedilu „obvestilo“), je Francija uradno obvestila Komisijo o svojem namenu, da zagotovi finančno pomoč ladjedelnici za popravilo ladij Compagnie Marseille Réparation (CMR).
The case was registered under case number N 728/02.
Zadeva je bila registrirana pod številko N 728/02.
By letter dated 13 December 2002, the Commission asked France for further information.
Z dopisom z dne 13. decembra 2002 je Komisija od Francije zahtevala dodatne podatke.
France replied by letter dated 6 March 2003, registered as received on 7 March 2003.
Francija je odgovorila z dopisom z dne 6. marca 2003, katerega prejem je bil registriran 7. marca 2003.
By letter dated 13 May 2003, the Commission informed France that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the notified measures.
Z dopisom z dne 13. maja 2003 je Komisija obvestila Francijo o svojem sklepu, da sproži postopek na podlagi člena 88(2) Pogodbe ES v zvezi s priglašenimi ukrepi.
The case was registered under case number C 34/03.
Zadeva je bila registrirana pod številko C 34/03.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [2].
Sklep Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [2].
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, da predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih.
France submitted its comments by letter dated 31 July 2003, registered as received on 4 August 2003.
Francija je predložila svoje pripombe z dopisom z dne 31. julija 2003, katerega prejem je bil registriran 4. avgusta 2003.
No comments from other interested parties were received.
Nobena druga zainteresirana stranka ni predložila pripomb.
France submitted further information by letter dated 2 October 2003, registered as received on 3 October 2003 and by letter dated 10 October 2003, registered as received on the same date.
Francija je predložila dodatne podatke z dopisom z dne 2. oktobra 2003, katerega prejem je bil registriran 3. oktobra 2003, in z dopisom z dne 10. oktobra 2003, katerega prejem je bil registriran na isti dan.
The Commission addressed further supplementary questions to France by letter dated 21 November 2003, to which France replied by letter dated 29 December 2003, registered as received on 8 January 2004, and by letter dated 29 January 2004, registered as received on the same date.
Komisija je na Francijo naslovila še druga dodatna vprašanja z dopisom z dne 21. novembra 2003, na katerega je Francija odgovorila z dopisom z dne 29. decembra, katerega prejem je bil registriran 8. januarja 2004, in z dopisom z dne 29. januarja 2004, katerega prejem je bil registriran na isti dan.
The Commission asked further questions by letter dated 10 May 2004, to which France replied by letter dated 29 June 2004, registered as received on the same date.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 10. maja 2004 zastavila še druga vprašanja, na katera je Francija odgovorila z dopisom z dne 29. junija 2004, katerega prejem je bil registriran na isti dan.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
PODROBEN OPIS
The recipient
Prejemnik
The recipient of the financial support is CMR, a ship repair company situated in Marseille.
Prejemnik finančne pomoči je podjetje CMR, družba za popravilo ladij iz Marseilla.
CMR was founded on 20 June 2002 to take over the assets of the bankrupt ship repair yard Compagnie Marseillaise de Réparations (CMdR).
Podjetje CMR je bilo ustanovljeno 20. junija 2002, da bi prevzelo sredstva ladjedelnice v stečaju, podjetja Compagnie Marseillaise de Réparations (CMdR).
Previously, ship repair activities in the port of Marseille had been carried out by three undertakings: Marine Technologie, Travofer and CMdR.
Pred tem so dejavnosti popravila ladij v pristanišču Marseille izvajala tri podjetja, Marine Technologie, Travofer in CMdR.
These yards employed some 430 people in 1996 (310 at CMdR, 70 at Marine Technologie and 50 at Travofer).
Leta 1996 je bilo v teh treh ladjedelnicah zaposlenih približno 430 oseb (310 v podjetju CMdR, 70 v podjetju Marine Technologie in 50 v podjetju Travofer).
In 1996, CMdR ran into difficulties and had to file for bankruptcy.
Leta 1996 je podjetje CMdR zašlo v težave in je moralo prijaviti stečaj.
A social plan was implemented in the course of the bankruptcy proceedings, helping CMdR to pay for charges related to early retirement and retraining leave for some of its staff, pending a takeover offer.
Med potekom stečajnega postopka se je izvajal socialni načrt, ki je pomagal podjetju CMdR pri plačevanju stroškov, povezanih s predčasnimi upokojitvami in dopustom za prekvalifikacijo dela osebja, dokler ne bi bila predlagana ponudba o prevzemu.
According to France, the plan was financed by the public authorities.
Francija meni, da so ta načrt financirali javni organi.
In 1997, CMdR was taken over by the Italian company Marinvest, which later on, in July 2000, sold it to the British group Cammell Laird.
Leta 1997 je podjetje CMdR prevzela italijanska družba Marinvest, ki je nato to podjetje julija 2000 prodala britanski skupini Cammell Laird.
At the same time, Cammell Laird also took over the other two Marseille ship repair yards, Marine Technologie and Travofer.
Hkrati je podjetje Cammell Laird prevzelo drugi dve ladjedelnici za popravilo ladij v Marseillu, podjetje Marine Technologie in podjetje Travofer.
Cammell Laird intended to reorganise the three companies within CMdR as a single undertaking and switch the activities from ship repair to ship conversion.
Podjetje Cammell Laird je nameravalo te tri družbe prestrukturirati v eno samo podjetje CMdR in dejavnosti popravila ladij prestrukturirati v dejavnosti predelave ladij.
Between July 2000 and July 2002, the workforce at CMdR had significantly decreased due to ‘asbestos departures’, i.e. the retirement of workers whose health had been affected by exposure to asbestos.
Med julijem 2000 in julijem 2002 se je število zaposlenih v podjetju CMdR močno zmanjšalo zaradi „odhodov zaradi azbesta“, kar pomeni upokojevanje delavcev, katerih zdravje je bilo načeto zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu.
In view of the objective of restructuring, these workers were not replaced.
Zaradi predvidenega prestrukturiranja ti delavci niso bili nadomeščeni.
The activities of CMdR were reduced accordingly, yet CMdR continued to pursue ship repair until its bankruptcy.
Obseg dejavnosti podjetja CMdR se je zato ustrezno zmanjšal, vendar pa je podjetje še naprej izvajalo dejavnosti popravila ladij do prijave stečaja.
Following the bankruptcy of Cammell Laird in 2001, CMdR got into difficulties.
Po stečaju podjetja Cammell Laird v letu 2001 je podjetje CMdR zašlo v težave.
On 31 July 2001, the commercial court of Marseille opened bankruptcy proceedings in respect of CMdR.
julija 2001 je gospodarsko sodišče v Marseillu sprožilo postopek sodne poravnave v zvezi s podjetjem CMdR.
CMR, a company set up on 20 June 2002, placed its takeover bid for CMdR at the commercial court of Marseille, which accepted the sale plan on 20 June 2002.
CMR, družba, ki je bila ustanovljena 20. junija 2002, je predstavila ponudbo prevzema podjetja CMdR gospodarskemu sodišču v Marseillu, ki je 20. junija 2002 sprejelo načrt prevzema.
Thus, in the context of the CMdR bankruptcy proceedings, CMR bought CMdR’s assets for a price of EUR 1001 (consisting of one symbolic euro for the assets and EUR 1000 for stocks).
Tako je podjetje CMR v okviru stečajnega postopka podjetja CMdR kupilo sredstva podjetja CMdR po ceni 1001 EUR (kar pomeni en simbolični euro za sredstva in 1000 EUR za zaloge).
The information shown on CMR’s balance sheet indicates that CMR started its operation in 2002 without debts.
Podatki na bilanci stanja podjetja CMR so pokazali, da je podjetje CMR leta 2002 začelo delovati brez dolgov.
France initially indicated that CMR also took over the work in progress.
Francija je na začetku naznanila, da je podjetje CMR prevzelo tudi nedokončana dela.
Moreover, in compliance with French social security legislation on the sale of business activities (Article L 122-12, paragraph 2 of the Labour Code), CMR was obliged to take over all the labour contracts with unchanged conditions regarding skills, pay and seniority.
Poleg tega je podjetje CMR v skladu s francosko zakonodajo o socialni varnosti v zvezi s prodajo poslovnih dejavnosti (drugi pododstavek člena L 122 12 Delovnega zakonika) moralo prevzeti vse pogodbe o delu z nespremenjenimi pogoji v zvezi z usposobljenostjo, plačilom in delovno dobo.
Likewise, CMR had to take over, firstly, wage obligations entered into before the takeover in the amount of EUR 500000 related to the departures of asbestos affected workers and, secondly, outstanding salaries (paid leave) in the amount of EUR 620000, these two figures being those initially quantified by France.
Prav tako je moralo podjetje CMR najprej prevzeti obveznosti v zvezi s plačami, sklenjenimi pred prevzemom, ki so znašale 500000 EUR in so povezane z „odhodi zaradi azbesta“, nato pa je prevzelo še neizplačane plače (plačan dopust) v višini 620000 EUR, ti dve številki pa ustrezata številkam, ki jih je Francija določila na začetku.
France informed the Commission that by March 2003 CMR employed 100 production workers as compared to the average of 184 in the five preceding years.
Francija je obvestila Komisijo, da je bilo do marca 2003 v podjetju zaposlenih 100 delavcev v proizvodnji, v primerjavi s povprečjem 184 zaposlenih v petih predhodnih letih.
CMR is owned by five shareholders, one of which acts as the managing director.
Podjetje CMR je v lasti petih delničarjev, od katerih eden deluje kot generalni direktor.
The business plan
Poslovni načrt
According to France, restoring the viability of ship repair activity in Marseille requires the implementation of a series of measures within CMR.
Francija meni, da je za dosego ponovne donosnosti dejavnosti popravila ladij v Marseillu treba opraviti niz notranjih ukrepov v podjetju CMR.
To this end, a five-year business plan was drawn up.
V ta namen je bil pripravljen petletni poslovni načrt.
CMR is said to have inherited from CMdR a number of charges (‘asbestos departures’, salaries (paid leave)) and difficulties such as loss of clientele seeking ship repair in the port of Marseille.
Podjetje CMR naj bi od podjetja CMdR podedovalo številne obveznosti („odhodi zaradi azbesta“, plače (plačani dopust)) in težave, na primer izgubo strank v sektorju popravila ladij v pristanišču Marseille.
This loss was attributed to Cammell Laird’s policy of focusing on ship conversion to the detriment of ship repair.
To izgubo naj bi povzročila politika podjetja Cammell Laird, ki je bila osredotočena na predelavo ladij na račun popravila ladij.
This is why France asserts that CMR is in need of restructuring.
Zato Francija trdi, da se mora podjetje CMR prestrukturirati.
France recognises that the existence of a single ship repair undertaking in Marseille (i.e. CMR) is in line with the needs and potential of the ship repair market.
Francija priznava, da je obstoj enega samega podjetja za popravilo ladij v Marseillu (tj. podjetja CMR) v skladu s potrebami in možnostmi na trgu popravila ladij.
The business plan, which France designates as a restructuring plan, is intended to tackle the problems encountered by CMR by adopting a series of measures.
Namen poslovnega načrta, ki ga Francija imenuje načrt prestrukturiranja, je odziv na težave podjetja CMR s sprejetjem niza ukrepov.
Firstly, the previous strategy pursued by Cammell Laird of switching from ship repair to ship conversion will be reversed and CMR will resume its traditional activity of ship repair.
Najprej se bo prejšnja strategija podjetja Cammell Laird o spremembi dejavnosti iz popravila ladij v predelavo ladij spremenila nazaj in podjetje CMR bo prevzelo svojo običajno dejavnost popravila ladij.
In addition, CMR will undertake the following steps, as described by France: reduction of structural costs, computer-assisted design, giving the management and the executive personnel greater responsibility, strict management of subcontracting and the development of multi-task capacities.
Poleg tega bo podjetje CMR sprejelo naslednje ukrepe, kot jih je opisala Francija: zmanjšanje strukturnih stroškov, računalniško podprta priprava, krepitev odgovornosti vodstvenega in vodilnega osebja, strogo upravljanje pogodb s podizvajalci, razvoj sposobnosti opravljanja več nalog hkrati.
Finally, some investment will be carried out and special attention will be given to training and specialisation of the staff.
Poleg tega se bodo izvedle nekatere naložbe, posebna pozornost pa bo osredotočena zlasti na usposabljanje in specializacijo osebja.
Once the company has repositioned itself on the market, it will also be able to seek to attract ship owners of more sophisticated vessels (such as cruise ships, passenger liners and gas tankers) who are not based in Marseille and for whom the price is not the only criterion for placing an order.
Potem ko bo družba ponovno prišla na trg, bo lahko privabila lastnike bolj zahtevnih ladij (na primer križark, potniških ladij in tankerjev za prevoz plina), ki nimajo sedeža v Marseillu in za katere cena ni edino merilo za oddajo naročil.
France submitted two versions of CMR’s business plan.
Francija je predložila dve različici poslovnega načrta podjetja CMR.
The notification was based on a plan involving a high operation hypothesis, with turnover amounting to EUR 30 million in 2006 (the high hypothesis). A second, more prudent, plan (the low hypothesis) was drawn up at the request of the commercial court of Marseille (turnover limited to EUR 20 million a year from the third year until the completion of the business plan).
Obvestilo je temeljilo na načrtu, ki je vključeval domnevo o obsežnem poslovanju s prometom v višini 30 milijonov EUR v letu 2006, drugi, previdnejši načrt (v nadaljnjem besedilu „previdna domneva“) pa je bil pripravljen na prošnjo gospodarskega sodišča v Marseillu (promet, omejen na 20 milijonov EUR na leto od tretjega leta naprej do zaključka poslovnega načrta).
The estimate of the company’s operation changed accordingly and Table 1 below reproduces these new estimates.
Ocena poslovanja družbe se je spremenila v skladu s tem in tabela 1 prikazuje to novo oceno.
Anticipated trend in CMR’s operation (the low hypothesis) [4] [3] [4]
Pričakovan trend poslovanja podjetja CMR (previdna domneva) [4] [3] [4]
Operation
Poslovanje
(6 months)
(6 mesecev)
Operating costs
Stroški poslovanja
Purchases of goods
Nakupi blaga
Purchases from subcontracting
Nakupi od podizvajalcev
Other purchases and external costs
Drugi nakupi in zunanji stroški
Salaries and wages
Plače
Paid holidays
Plačan dopust
‘Asbestos departures’
„Odhodi zaradi azbesta“
Total personnel costs
Skupni stroški dela
External assistance
Zunanja pomoč
Total personnel charges and assistance
Skupni stroški dela in pomoči
Taxes
Davki
Total operating costs
Skupni stroški poslovanja
Subsidy [5]
Subvencije [5]
Net operating result
Neto rezultat poslovanja
According to France, the business plan is based on the turnovers generated by the ship repair companies in Marseille before the Cammell Laird group experienced difficulties in 2000 and on the capacity of CMR to achieve similar levels within two years.
Francija meni, da poslovni načrt temelji na prometu, ki so jih družbe za popravilo ladij v Marseillu dosegle, preden je skupina Cammell Laird zašla v težave v letu 2000, in na zmožnosti podjetja CMR, da doseže podobne rezultate v dveh letih.
France also stresses that the project takes account of the stagnation in the level of customers at the time of the takeover and that the approach adopted is even more prudent in the low hypothesis.
Francija poudarja tudi, da načrt upošteva mirovanje števila strank v času prevzema in da je sprejeti pristop še previdnejši v previdni domnevi.
The costs of implementing the low hypothesis business plan, i.e., according to France, the costs of restructuring, are specified in Part 1 of Table 2 below.
Stroški izvajanja poslovnega načrta, ki temelji na previdni domnevi, to so po mnenju Francije stroški prestrukturiranja, so določeni v delu 1 tabele 2.
France further claimed as restructuring costs charges related to ‘asbestos departures’ incurred before the takeover and outstanding salaries (paid leave) incurred before the takeover.
Francija je poleg tega med stroške prestrukturiranja štela obveznosti, povezane z „odhodi zaradi azbesta“ in neizplačanimi plačami (plačanim dopustom), ki so nastali pred prevzemom.
These costs are outlined in Part 2 of Table 2 below, taking into account reviewed figures provided by France in its letter of 29 January 2004.
Ti stroški so opisani v delu 2 tabele 2 in vključujejo spremenjene številke, ki jih je predložila Francija z dopisom z dne 29. januarja 2004.
Claimed costs of restructuring CMR
Prošnja za povračilo stroškov prestrukturiranja podjetja CMR
Item
POSTAVKA
Amount
ZNESEK
Investment in restructuring and maintenance (2002 to 2006):
Naložbe v prestrukturiranje in vzdrževanje (2002–2006):
Initial
začetno
Annual (4 × EUR 100000)
letno (4 × 100000 EUR)
Inventories
Zaloge
Training needs: 200 man/hours [6]
Potrebe usposabljanja: 200 ur/osebo [6]
Subtotal 1
Vmesni seštevek 1
Costs for ‘asbestos departures’ incurred before the takeover
Stroški „odhodov zaradi azbesta“, ki so se zgodili pred prevzemom
Paid leave due before the takeover
Še neizplačan plačani dopust pred prevzemom
Subtotal 2
Vmesni seštevek 2
Total (Subtotal 1 + Subtotal 2)
SKUPAJ (vmesni seštevek 1 + vmesni seštevek 2)
The total costs deemed necessary to launch CMR are thus EUR 3649494.
Skupni stroški, ki so ocenjeni kot potrebni za začetek poslovanja podjetja CMR, tako znašajo 3649494 EUR.
According to France, the EUR 3649494 required by CMR is to be financed by loans and grants provided from public and private sources as outlined in Table 3 below.
Francija meni, da bo 3649494 EUR, ki jih potrebuje podjetje CMR, financiranih prek posojil in subvencij iz javnih in zasebnih virov, kot je opisano v tabeli 3.
France adopted a preliminary decision to grant public support to CMR on 3 May 2002, i.e. even before CMR was set up and before CMR took over the assets of CMdR.
Francija je sprejela predhodno odločbo o dodelitvi javne pomoči podjetju CMR 3. maja 2002, kar se je zgodilo še pred ustanovitvijo podjetja CMR in preden je podjetje CMR prevzelo sredstva podjetja CMdR.
A legally binding decision to grant the support was issued on 26 June 2002.
Pravno zavezujoča odločba o dodelitvi pomoči je bila sprejeta 26. junija 2002.
Financial measures related to the restructuring CMR
Finančni ukrepi v zvezi s prestrukturiranjem podjetja CMR
Part 1 — Public contributions
Del 1 – Javni prispevki
French central government
Francoska vlada
Conseil régional of Provence Alpes-Côte d’Azur
Regionalni svet departmaja Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur
Conseil général of Bouches-du-Rhône
Razširjeni svet departmaja Bouches-du-Rhône
City of Marseille
Mesto Marseille
Part 2 — Private contributions
Del 2 – Zasebni prispevki