natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eligible cost must be confined strictly to the extra investment costs necessary to meet the environmental objectives.
Upravičeni stroški se morajo strogo omejiti na dodatne investicijske stroške, ki so potrebni za doseganje okoljevarstvenih ciljev.
DIP2, PM4 and PM3: increasing the recycling rate
Stroji DIP2, PM4 in PM3: povečanje stopnje recikliranja
The Commission does not question the environmental benefit from recycling waste paper.
Komisija ne podvomi v prednosti, ki jih recikliranje papirnih odpadkov predstavlja za okolje.
It considers, however, that point 29 of the guidelines does not justify the aid for DIP2, PM4 and PM3 in as far as they increase the recycling rate.
Vendar Komisija meni, da je nemogoče upravičiti pomoč, dodeljeno za stroje DIP2, PM4 in PM3 na podlagi točke 29 smernic pomoči za okolje, ker povečujejo stopnjo recikliranja.
First of all, the Commission recalls that according to the general principles of law, an exception should be interpreted in a restrictive manner.
Komisija najprej spomni, da se mora, skladno s splošnimi pravnimi načeli, vsako izjemo razlagati na restriktiven način.
The guidelines define the conditions under which the Commission may consider that aid is compatible with the common market in accordance with Article 87(3)(c) of the Treaty, and therefore form an exception to the general prohibition laid down in Article 87(1) of the Treaty.
Smernice pomoči za okolje določajo okoliščine, v katerih Komisija lahko oceni neko pomoč kot združljivo s skupnim trgom skladno s točko (c) odstavka 3 člena 87 Pogodbe in torej predstavlja izjemo k splošni prepovedi, ki se pojavlja v odstavku 1 člena 87 Pogodbe.
It should also be recalled that the environmental aid guidelines are based on the general principle of ‘the polluter pays’, and that every interpretation of the guidelines should strictly comply with this underlying principle.
Potrebno je tudi spomniti, da so smernice pomoči za okolje osnovane na splošnem načelu „onesnaževalec-plačnik“ in da mora vsakršna razlaga teh smernic nujno upoštevati to načelo.
The investment in PM3, PM4 and DIP2 will be used to produce newsprint and magazine paper, which will eventually end up as waste paper.
Naložbe v stroje PM3, PM4 in DIP2 bodo uporabljene za izdelavo časopisnega in revialnega papirja, ki bosta končala v obliki papirnih odpadkov.
The increased production capacity will therefore lead to increased quantities of waste paper, which will only be partially recycled.
Povečanje proizvodne zmogljivosti bo torej povzročila povečanje količine papirnih odpadkov, ki bodo samo deloma reciklirani.
In this respect, the closure of PM2 and the reduction of production in Finland and Sweden that (partially) counterbalance the increased capacity of PM3 and PM4, cannot be taken into account.
V tem pogledu se izključitev naprave PM2 in zmanjšanje proizvodnje na Finskem in Švedskem, ki (deloma) izravnavata povečanje zmogljivosti strojev PM3 in PM4, ne more upoštevati.
The closed capacity is older than the newly installed capacity, has different technical characteristics and is positioned in the market in a different way.
Izključene zmogljivosti so starejše kot nove zmogljivosti, imajo drugačne tehnične značilnosti in niso postavljene na trg na isti način.
Therefore, a direct comparison is not appropriate.
Neposredna primerjava je torej nemogoča.
The investments are likely to increase the demand for waste paper.
Naložbe lahko povečajo povpraševanje po papirnih odpadkih.
However, it is not ensured that the investments will actually lead to an increase of waste paper collection, not in general, and not as regards waste paper deriving from SEL’s sales.
Vendarle ni zagotovljeno, da bodo dejansko pripeljale do povečanja zbiranja papirnih odpadkov, niti na splošno niti kar zadeva papirne odpadke, ki izhajajo iz prodaj družbe SEL.
Consequently, the investments will not reduce SEL’s own pollution.
Zato naložbe ne bodo zmanjšale onesnaženja, ki ga povzroča sama družba SEL.
The environmental benefits may derive from indirect effects on supply and demand for waste paper that affect all users and providers of waste paper concerned, not only SEL.
Koristi za okolje bodo lahko izhajale iz posrednih učinkov na ponudbo in povpraševanje po papirnih odpadkih, ki prizadevajo vse uporabnike in ponudnike teh proizvodov in ne samo družbo SEL.
A fortiori, the Commission notes that the norms as regards recycling percentages are not legal norms directly applicable to the individual companies, even though in the Belgian situation they have an important impact on SEL’s activities.
Vrh tega Komisija ugotavlja, da standardi glede deleža recikliranih odpadkov niso zakoniti standardi, ki bi bili neposredno uporabni za različna podjetja, čeprav imajo v primeru Belgije velik učinek na dejavnosti družbe SEL.
They are rather norms for the Member States that have been imposed by EU law, notably the Landfill directive [11]. and the Packaging directive [12].
Gre bolj za standarde, ki jih državam članicam nalaga evropska zakonodaja, zlasti Direktiva Sveta 1999/31/ES z dne 26. aprila 1999 glede odlaganja odpadkov [11] in Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 94/62/ES z dne 20. decembra 1994 glede embalaž in odpadnih embalaž [12].
The aid is not granted to improve on the standards applicable to the firm directly.
Pomoč ni dodeljena zato, da bi omogočila podjetju prekoračitev standardov, ki so zanj neposredno uporabni.
The first situation referred to in point 29 of the environmental aid guidelines, which allows aid to be granted in order to enable firms to improve on Community standards applicable therefore does not apply in this case.
Prva okoliščina, ki je omenjena v točki 29 smernic pomoči za okolje, ki odobri dodelitev pomoči zato, da bi omogočile podjetjem prekoračitev uporabnih standardov Skupnosti, torej v tem primeru ni uporabna.
Belgium held, instead, that the second situation referred to in point 29 of the environmental aid guidelines, concerning aid for firms to undertake investments in the absence of Community standards, would be applicable.
Belgija nasprotno ocenjuje, da bi bila druga okoliščina, ki je omenjena v točki 29 smernic pomoči za okolje, namreč primer pomoči, dodeljenih podjetjem, ki izvajajo naložbe v odsotnosti standardov Skupnosti, uporabna.
The Commission, however, concludes that this is not the case.
Vendar je Komisija prišla do zaključka, da temu ni tako.
The aid in favour of the investments in PM3, PM4 and DIP2 as a whole intend to promote recycling and relieve the actual polluters from charges they should normally bear.
Pomoči v korist naložbam v stroje PM3, PM4 in DIP2 imajo za splošni cilj dajanje prednosti recikliranju, zato da bi resnične onesnaževalce razbremenili stroškov, ki bi jih morali praviloma nositi sami.
The aid is not intended to reduce the quantity of waste paper that results from SEL’s sales.
Pomoč nima namena zmanjšati količino papirnih odpadkov, ki izhaja iz prodaj družbe SEL.
It rather encourages SEL to take up waste paper that may originate from products sold by any paper producer.
Prej spodbuja družbo SEL, da prevzame papirne odpadke, ki lahko izhajajo iz prodanih proizvodov od katerega koli izdelovalca papirja.
The Commission considers that point 29 of the environmental aid guidelines concerns cases where an undertaking invests to improve its own environmental record, and to reduce its own pollution.
Komisija ocenjuje, da se točka 29 smernic pomoči za okolje uporablja v primerih, v katerih neko podjetje investira zato, da izboljša svoje lastne rezultate na okoljskem področju in da zmanjša svoje lastno onesnaževanje.
In such cases, aid can be allowed as an incentive to improve the environmental situation of the company.
V takih primerih so pomoči lahko dodeljene zato, da spodbudijo podjetje k izboljšavi lastnega položaja na okoljskem področju.
Otherwise, the rules could be easily circumvented by granting aid not to the polluters, but to the companies taking care of the pollution.
Drugače bi se lahko zlahka izognili predpisom tako, da bi dodelili pomoči ne onesnaževalcem, ampak družbam, ki prevzamejo odgovornost za onesnaževanje.
This interpretation is confirmed by point 18(b) of the environmental aid guidelines, which states that aid ‘may act as an incentive to firms to improve on standards or to undertake further investment designed to reduce pollution from their plants.’
Ta razlaga je potrjena s točko 18(b) smernic pomoči za okolje, po kateri „imajo lahko pomoči tudi spodbujajoč učinek, zlasti da spodbudijo podjetja k preseganju standardov ali k izvajanju dodatnih naložb, ki bi zmanjšale onesnaževanje njihovih naprav“.
Furthermore, the interpretation suggested by Belgium might result in Member States subsidising investments in all those sectors where the use of secondary raw materials is possible.
Vrh tega bi razlaga, ki jo predlaga Belgija, omogočila državam članicam subvencioniranje naložb na vseh področjih, kjer je možna uporaba sekundarnih surovin.
Such aid could be granted without having to comply with State aid rules such as those for regional aid or for SME-investment aid.
Te pomoči bi bile dodeljene, ne da bi podjetja morala upoštevati predpise glede državnih pomoči, zlasti regionalnih pomoči ali pomoči za naložbe malih in srednje velikih podjetij.
Such aid might entail serious distortions on the relevant markets.
Take pomoči bi lahko povzročile resna izkrivljanja na zadevnih trgih.
The Commission therefore considers that point 29 of the environmental aid guidelines does not apply to the investments in PM3, PM4 and DIP2 as a whole.
Zato Komisija ocenjuje, da točka 29 smernic pomoči za okolje ni uporabna za naložbe v stroje PM3, PM4 in DIP2 v njihovi celoti.
The Commission, however, has also assessed whether points 29 or 30 of the guidelines could be applicable to parts of the investments.
Vendar je Komisija preverila, če bi se lahko za določene dele naložb uporabilo točki 29 ali 30 smernic pomoči za okolje.
Separate environmental investments within PM3, PM4 and DIP2, energy reduction by PM4
Različni elementi okoljskih naložb v stroje PM3, PM4 in DIP2, zmanjšanje porabe energije stroja PM4
As explained in point 9, Belgium held that within the investment in PM4 and DIP2, various elements with an extra cost of at least EUR 19.1 million would be eligible for aid under point 29.
Kot je bilo rečeno v točki 9, Belgija ocenjuje, da bi različni elementi naložb v napravi PM4 in DIP2, ki predstavljajo dodatne stroške najmanj v višini 19,1 milijonov EUR, lahko uživali ugodnosti pomoči v skladu s točko 29 smernic pomoči za okolje.
The description of these elements, however, points to various cost savings.
Vendar opis teh elementov pokaže na določeno število prihrankov pri stroških.
The additional investment in cooling-towers, for example, would lead to a decrease of energy consumption in the winter period of 10 MW.
Dodatna naložba v hladilne stolpe, na primer, bo povzročila zmanjšanje porabe energije v zimskem času za 10 MW.
The closure of the white-water circuit is intended to reduce the water consumption.
Zaprtje pretoka raztopine svinčevega acetata je namenjeno zmanjšanju porabe vode.
The use of ‘shoe presses’ instead of conventional presses in the press-section of the paper mill allows SEL to reach a higher degree of dryness, it optimises the drying process and allows for energy saving.
Uporaba novih stiskalnic (vrste „shoe press“) namesto običajnih stiskalnic omogoča družbi SEL pridobivanje bolj suhega papirja, izboljšuje postopek sušenja in omogoča prihranke energije.
Despite the repeated request from the Commission, Belgium has neither demonstrated whether these costs can be fully accepted as additional cost, nor indicated which operating benefits SEL derives from these specific parts of the investment, as required in point 36 and 37 of the guidelines.
Kljub večkrat ponovljeni prošnji Komisije Belgija ni niti dokazala, da so ti stroški lahko v celoti sprejemljivi kot dodatni stroški, niti ni navedla, kakšne koristi bi družba SEL potegnila iz teh posebnih elementov naložbe, kot to zahtevata točki 36 in 37 smernic pomoči za okolje.
Consequently, on this basis it is not possible to calculate which amount of aid could be allowed.
Torej ni mogoče izračunati višino zneska pomoči, ki se ga lahko odobri.
As described in point 10, Belgium argued that PM4 would be eligible for aid under point 30 of the guidelines as it reduces energy consumption.
Kot je bilo rečeno v točki 10, je Belgija uveljavljala, da bi stroj PM4 lahko užival ugodnosti pomoči na podlagi točke 30 smernic pomoči za okolje, kolikor omogoča zmanjšanje porabe energije.
Instead of investing in a paper machine with a conventional width, SEL chose for an innovative machine that uses less energy.
Namesto da bi družba SEL investirala v papirni stroj običajne širine, se je odločila za inovativen stroj, ki potrebuje manj energije.
The investment, therefore, falls within the definition of energy-saving.
Naložba torej odgovarja opredelitvi prihrankov energije.
In accordance with point 36 and 37 of the guidelines only the investments that are strictly necessary in order to meet environmental objectives are eligible for aid.
Skladno s točkama 36 in 37 smernic pomoči za okolje, samo naložbe, ki so nujno potrebne za zadostitev okoljskim ciljem, izpolnjujejo pogoje za odobritev pomoči.
It is not just one part of PM4 that allows reducing energy consumption.
Ni samo en del stroja PM4 tak, da omogoča zmanjšanje porabe energije.
The crucial factor is the higher width of all rotating elements. This, however, affects the whole design and construction of the machine, and requires as well a lower speed and the adaptations in the press-section.
Odločilen dejavnik je večja širina celote rotacijskih elementov, ki vpliva na celotno načrtovanje in izdelavo stroja in zahteva tako manjšo hitrost kot prilagoditev področja stiskalnic.
An independent expert had made a detailed estimate of the cost of a conventional newsprint machine.
Neodvisen strokovnjak je izvedel podrobno ovrednotenje stroškov za običajen stroj za izdelavo časopisnega papirja.
Later a detailed estimate of the cost of the actual investment was made.
Nato je bilo izvedeno podrobno ovrednotenje dejanskih investicijskih stroškov.
Differences result not only from the technical specifications, but also from more precise knowledge, estimates of potential price reductions, etc. The estimated eligible cost of EUR 14.1 million, however, concerns only the differences in cost as regards the investments in machinery [13].
Razlike izhajajo ne samo iz tehničnih specifikacij, ampak tudi iz točnejših informacij, ocen možnih znižanj cen, itd. Vendar se upravičeni strošek, ocenjen v višini 14,1 milijonov EUR, nanaša samo na stroškovne razlike v zvezi z naložbami v opremo [13].
This estimate has been made on the basis of conservative assumptions avoiding overestimation.
To ovrednotenje se je izvedlo na podlagi previdnih domnev, z izogibanjem vsakršni pretirani oceni.
In accordance with point 37, second sub-paragraph of the guidelines, the eligible costs must be calculated net of benefits accruing from any increase of capacity expansion and cost savings engendered during the first five years of the life of the investment.
Skladno z drugim pododstavkom točke 37 smernic pomoči za okolje, morajo biti upravičeni stroški izračunani tako, da se ne upošteva koristi od možnih povečanj zmogljivosti in prihrankov pri stroških, ustvarjenih v prvih petih letih življenjske dobe naložbe.
The benefits from savings on energy, raw materials and productivity, however, are outweighed by the higher start-up costs in the initial years of the investment.
Vendar povišani stroški za zagon v prvih letih življenjske dobe naložbe presegajo koristi od prihrankov, ustvarjenih na področjih energije, primarnih surovin in produktivnosti.
In conclusion, the Commission can find aid for PM4 compatible up to the amount of 40 % x EUR 14,1 million = EUR 5,64 million.
Skratka, v primeru naprave PM4 Komisija ocenjuje, da pomoči v višini 40 % × 14,1 milijonov EUR = 5,64 milijonov EUR lahko razumemo kot sprejemljive.
There is no parallel on the basis of which aid for PM3 and DIP2 can be found compatible.
Ne obstaja vzporednica, na podlagi katere bi lahko pomoči za napravi PM3 in DIP2 ocenili kot združljive.
Point 31 of the environmental aid guidelines foresee that investments in the combined production of electric power and heat may be eligible for aid when the conversion efficiency is particularly high.
Skladno s točko 31 smernic pomoči za okolje naložbe v korist soproizvodnje toplote in elektrike lahko uživajo ugodnosti pomoči, kadar je pretvorbena učinkovitost še posebej visoka.
In this connection the Commission will take into particular consideration the type of primary energy used in the production process.
V tem pogledu bo Komisija zlasti upoštevala primarni tip energije, ki je uporabljen v proizvodnem postopku.
Such investment may be eligible for aid at the basic rate of 40 % of eligible cost as defined in point 36 and 37 of the guidelines.
Te naložbe lahko skladno s točkama 36 in 37 smernic pomoči za okolje uživajo ugodnosti pomoči po osnovni stopnji 40 % upravičenih stroškov.
The installation will use bio-mass [14] available directly at the plant and natural gas and it will have an energy conversion efficiency of 87,5 to 90 %.
Naprava bo uporabljala biomaso [14], ki bo prihajala neposredno iz tovarne, kot tudi zemeljski plin, in njena pretvorbena učinkovitost bo znašala 87,5-90 %.
Taking into account as well the dispositions of Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending Directive 92/42/EEC [15], the Commission deems that the investment falls within point 31 of the guidelines.
Ob upoštevanju tudi določb Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/8/ES z dne 11. februarja 2004 glede spodbujanja soproizvodnje na podlagi povpraševanja po koristni toploti na notranjem energetskem trgu, ki spreminjajo Direktivo 92/42/EGS [15], Komisija ocenjuje, da ta naložba pade v polje uporabe točke 31 smernic pomoči za okolje.
All costs indicated in table 1 above concern buildings, plant and equipment that are necessary in order to produce and use the electricity and steam generated by the biomass CHP installation.
Celotni zadevni stroški se nanašajo na stavbe, naprave in opremo, ki so potrebni za proizvodnjo in uporabo elektrike in pare, ki sta proizvedeni z napravo za soproizvodnjo toplote in elektrike iz biomase.
They are therefore eligible pursuant to point 36 of the guidelines.
Zato so skladno s točko 36 smernic pomoči za okolje upravičeni.
In accordance with point 37, second subparagraph, of the guidelines, only the extra costs can be eligible.
Skladno z drugim pododstavkom točke 37 smernic pomoči za okolje so upravičeni samo dodatni stroški.
In this case, the most economical alternative investment is a conventional combined heat and power installation.
V tem primeru bi najbolj gospodarno izbiro predstavljala naložba v običajno napravo za soproizvodnje toplote in elektrike.
This would consist in a high pressure steam generator of 55000 kW and a back pressure steam turbine of 9400 kW with a total investment cost of EUR 5180000.
V tem primeru bi šlo za generator visokotlačne pare z močjo 55000 kW in dodatno parno turbino z močjo 9400 kW, kar bi predstavljalo naložbo s celotnimi stroški v vrednosti 5180000 EUR.
In accordance with point 37, third subparagraph, of the guidelines, eligible cost must be calculated net of the cost savings engendered during the first five years of the life of the investment and additional ancillary production during that five-year period.
Skladno s tretjo alineo točke 37 smernic pomoči za okolje morajo biti upravičeni stroški izračunani tako, da se ne upošteva prihrankov pri stroških, ustvarjenih v prvih petih letih življenjske dobe naložbe, in dodatnih postranskih proizvodenj v istem obdobju petih let.
The savings are the following:
Zadevni prihranki so naslednji:
cost forgone of operating a conventional CHP plant: this includes costs of fuelling the conventional CHP plant for producing the same quantities of steam and heat, operating personnel, maintenance, demineralised water of the conventional CHP plant,
prihranjeni stroški pri obratovanju običajne naprave za soproizvodnjo toplote in elektrike: gre za stroške pri oskrbi z gorivom običajne naprave SPTE za proizvodnjo enakih količin pare in toplote, stroške osebja, stroške vzdrževanja in stroške za demineralizirano vodo, ki je potrebna za delovanje običajne naprave;
cost forgone of sludge treatment.
prihranjeni stroški pri obdelavi odpadkov.
If not combusted in the CHP-installation, SEL would have had the following options: (1) land-spreading, in particular as regards the sludge from the water cleaning, not as regards de-inking sludge, (2) use in the brick industry, (3) use as fuel in electricity production, in particular as the sludge qualifies as biomass, (4) use in the cement industry,
Če odpadki ne bi bili sežgani v napravi SPTE, bi družba SEL lahko izbirala med naslednjimi rešitvami: 1) raztrositev, zlasti kar zadeva odpadke, ki izhajajo iz čiščenja vode, toda ne za odpadke, ki izhajajo iz razčrniljenja; 2) uporaba na področju zidakov; 3) uporaba kot gorivo za proizvodnjo elektrike, zlasti kolikor se odpadke razume kot biomaso; 4) uporaba na področju cementa;
operating aid: SEL will be entitled to green energy certificates for the electricity it produces.
pomoči delovanju: družba SEL bo lahko pridobila zelene certifikate za elektriko, ki jo proizvaja.
The Belgian authorities guarantee a minimum price of EUR 80 per certificate.
Belgijske oblasti zagotavljajo najnižjo ceno v višini 80 EUR na certifikat.
The actual price obtained in 2003 was slightly higher.
Dejanska cena je bila leta 2003 rahlo višja.
The additional cost, on the other hand, is the following operating cost of the sludge CHP installations: gas for co-fuelling, transport and disposal of ashes, demi-water consumption, a much higher personnel cost, cost of environmental certification and control and cost of flue gas cleaning.
Kolikor zadeva dodatne stroške, to so stroški obratovanja, ki izhajajo iz naprave PSTE za obdelavo odpadkov: plin za soproizvodnjo, prevoz in odstranjevanje pepela, poraba demineralizirane vode, precej višji stroški osebja, stroški za okoljske certifikate, kontrola in stroški za prečiščenje zgorelih izpušnih plinov.
The cost of de-watering sludge before combustion is not to be subtracted, as de-watering is necessary in any case.
Stroški za odvajanje vode iz odpadkov pred sežigom niso bili odbiti, kolikor je odvajanje vode na vsak način nujno.
Over the five-year period, from May 2003 until April 2008, the total net savings amount to EUR 16343000, net present value on 1 January 2003.
V obdobju petih let, od maja 2003 do aprila 2008, bi celotni čisti prihranki znašali 16343000 EUR, kar je bila dejanska čista vrednost 1. januarja 2003.
Based on the above, the allowable aid amounts to 40 % × (EUR 55147000 – EUR 5180000 – EUR 16343000) = EUR 13449600.
Ob upoštevanju prej povedanega, upravičeni zneski znašajo 40 % × [55147000 EUR – 5180000 EUR – 16343000 EUR] = 13449600 EUR.
In some situations, sludge combustion in a CHP installation may fall within point 29 of the environmental aid guidelines. This could be the case where the company opts for a disposal technology for the sludge that is more environmentally friendly than another option that would be less environmentally friendly, but still allowed under the Community rules.
V nekaterih primerih lahko sežiganje odpadkov v napravi SPTE spada pod točko 29 smernic pomoči za okolje, na primer kadar si družba izbere tako tehnologijo odstranjevanja odpadkov, ki je ugodnejša za okolje kot neka druga tehnologija, ki je odobrena na podlagi predpisov Skupnosti.
SEL, however, does not have such alternative option.
Vendar družba SEL ni imela na voljo take možnosti.
In all situations, the sludge would be incinerated, with or without recovery of the calorific value.
V vsakem primeru bi bili odpadki upepeljeni, z ali brez rekuperacije toplote.