natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to ensure that the fine has a sufficient deterrent effect on large undertakings and take account of the fact that large undertakings have legal and economic knowledge and infrastructures which enable them more easily to recognise that their conduct constitutes an infringement, and to be aware of the consequences stemming from that conduct under competition law, the starting amount for Hoechst should be further adjusted.
Da bi zagotovili, da bo globa imela zadosten učinek odvračanja na velika podjetja, in upoštevali, da imajo velika podjetja pravno in gospodarsko znanje ter infrastrukture, ki jim omogočajo, da še lažje prepoznajo, ali njihove dejavnosti predstavljajo kršitev, in so zato lahko pozorni na posledice, ki izhajajo iz te dejavnosti v okviru zakonodaje o konkurenci, je treba začetni znesek za podjetje Hoechst še prilagoditi.
In the case of Hoechst, being by far the largest undertaking concerned by this Decision, the Commission considers that the appropriate starting amount for a fine resulting from the criterion of the relative importance in the market concerned requires further upward adjustment to take account of its size and its overall resources.
V primeru podjetja Hoechst, ki je daleč največje podjetje, ki ga zadeva ta odločba, Komisija meni, da je treba primeren začetni znesek za globo, ki izhaja iz kriterija relativne pomembnosti na zadevnem trgu, še dodatno prilagoditi navzgor, zato da bi upoštevali velikost podjetja in njegova celotna sredstva.
Therefore, the starting amount of its fine determined in recital 22 should be increased by 100 % to EUR 40 million.
Zato je treba začetni znesek globe, določen v uvodni izjavi (22), povečati za 100 %, na 40 milijonov EUR.
The Commission considers that Chisso, Daicel, Hoechst and Ueno infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement from 31 December 1978 until 31 October 1996.
Komisija meni, da so Chisso, Daicel, Hoechst in Ueno kršili člen 81(1) Pogodbe in člen 53(1) Sporazuma EGP od 31. decembra 1978 do 31. oktobra 1996.
They committed a long-term infringement of 17 years and 10 months.
Zakrivili so dolgoročno kršitev, ki je trajala 17 let in 10 mesecev.
The starting amount of the fines determined for gravity for Chisso, Daicel, Ueno and for Hoechst, should therefore be increased by 175 %.
Začetni znesek glob, določen za resnost kršitve, za Chisso, Daicel, Ueno in Hoechst je zato treba povečati za 175 %.
Nippon infringed Article 81(1) of the Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement from 31 December 1978 until 30 November 1995.
Nippon je kršil člen 81(1) Pogodbe in člen 53(1) Sporazuma EGP od 31. decembra 1978 do 30. novembra 1995.
It committed a long-term infringement of 16 years and 11 months.
Zakrivil je dolgoročno kršitev, ki je trajala 16 let in 11 mesecev.
The starting amount of its fine determined in recital (22) for gravity should therefore be increased by 165 %.
Začetni znesek globe, določen v uvodni izjavi (22) za resnost kršitve, je zato treba povečati za 165 %.
The Commission accordingly sets the basic amounts of the fines for Chisso at EUR 18,315 million, for Daicel at EUR 18,315 million, for Hoechst at EUR 110 million, for Nippon at EUR 17,649 million and for Ueno at EUR 18,315 million.
Komisija temu primerno določa osnovne zneske glob: za Chisso 18,315 milijonov EUR, za Daicel 18,315 milijonov EUR, za Hoechst 110 milijonov EUR, za Nippon 17,649 milijonov EUR in za Ueno 18,315 milijonov EUR.
Hoechst’s leading role in the cartel and its recidivist behaviour should therefore be considered as aggravating circumstances, justifying increases of 30 % and of 50 % respectively of the basic amount of the fine.
Kot oteževalno okoliščino je treba upoštevati glavno vlogo podjetja Hoechst v kartelu in njegovo recidivistično obnašanje, kar upravičuje povečanja osnovnega zneska globe za 30 % oziroma 50 %.
Daicel, alongside with Hoechst, was a driving force behind the cartel.
Daicel je bil, poleg podjetja Hoechst, gonilna sila kartela.
The two undertakings were by far the most powerful cartel members, with the largest market share and sharing the same interests.
Ti dve podjetji sta bili daleč najvplivnejša člana kartela, z največjim tržnim deležem in enakimi interesi.
The fact that Hoechst played a leading role in the infringement does not mean that Daicel did not also do so.
Dejstvo, da je Hoechst igral glavno vlogo pri kršitvi, ne pomeni, da Daicel ni imel takšne vloge.
However, the Commission accepts that other members of the cartel took certain initiatives in order to realise their common anti-competitive goals.
Komisija pa sprejema, da so tudi drugi člani kartela imeli določene pobude, da bi izpolnili svoje skupne protikonkurenčne cilje.
Having regard to the foregoing, the basic amount of the fine should be increased, in the case of Daicel, by 30 %.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj omenjenega je treba v primeru podjetja Daicel osnovni znesek povečati za 30 %.
There are no aggravating circumstances relating to the infringement in Chisso’s case.
V primeru podjetja Chisso v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo oteževalne okoliščine.
There are no aggravating circumstances relating to the infringement in Nippon’s case.
V primeru podjetja Nippon v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo oteževalne okoliščine.
There are no aggravating circumstances relating to the infringement in Ueno’s case.
V primeru podjetja Ueno v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo oteževalne okoliščine.
There are no attenuating circumstances relating to the infringement in Hoechst’s case.
V primeru podjetja Hoechst v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo olajševalne okoliščine.
There are no attenuating circumstances relating to the infringement in Daicel’s case.
V primeru podjetja Daicel v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo olajševalne okoliščine.
There are no attenuating circumstances relating to the infringement in Chisso’s case.
V primeru podjetja Chisso v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo olajševalne okoliščine.
There are no attenuating circumstances relating to the infringement in Nippon’s case.
V primeru podjetja Nippon v zvezi s kršitvijo ne obstajajo olajševalne okoliščine.
With reference to Ueno’s case the Commission will consider as an attenuating circumstance the non-implementation in practice of the agreed volume quota allocations.
Komisija bo v zvezi s primerom podjetja Ueno kot olajševalno okoliščino upoštevala neizvajanje v praksi dogovorjenih dodelitev količinskih kvot.
Application of the 1996 Leniency Notice
Uporaba obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996
The 2002 Leniency Notice is clearly inapplicable to this case.
Jasno je, da uporaba obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 2002 v tem primeru ni mogoča.
The dividing line for the application ratione temporis of the 1996 and 2002 Notices has been drawn in point 28 of the 2002 Notice, which reads as follows:
Meja med uporabo ratione temporis obvestila iz leta 1996 in obvestila iz leta 2002 je bila zarisana v točki 28 obvestila iz leta 2002, kjer piše naslednje:
‘From 14 February 2002, this notice replaces the 1996 notice for all cases in which no undertaking has contacted the Commission in order to take advantage of the favourable treatment set out in that notice.’
„Od 14. februarja 2002 to obvestilo nadomešča obvestilo iz leta 1996 za vse primere, v katerih nobeno podjetje ni stopilo v stik s Komisijo, da bi izkoristilo ugodno obravnavo, določeno v tistem obvestilu.“
In this case, several undertakings, including Hoechst, had already ‘contacted’ the Commission before that date.
V tem primeru pa je več podjetij – vključno s podjetjem Hoechst – pred tistim datumom že „stopilo v stik“ s Komisijo.
The 1996 Leniency Notice therefore remains applicable.
Zato ostane v uporabi obvestilo o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996.
In accordance with Section B of the 1996 Leniency Notice, the Commission grants Chisso a 100 % reduction of the fine that would otherwise have been imposed had it not cooperated with the Commission.
Komisija, v skladu z razdelkom B obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996, podjetju Chisso odobri 100 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi podjetju sicer bila naložena, če ne bi sodelovalo s Komisijo.
Therefore, the Commission will not impose any fine on Chisso.
Zato Komisija podjetju Chisso ne bo naložila globe.
Significant reduction of a fine (‘Section D’: reduction from 10 to 50 %)
Znatno zmanjšanje globe („razdelek D“: zmanjšanje od 10 % do 50 %)
After due consideration of Hoechst’s cooperation under the 1996 Leniency Notice, the Commission grants it, in accordance with the first and second indent of Section D(2) of that Notice, a 50 % reduction of the fine that would have been imposed if it had not cooperated with the Commission.
Komisija, ob upoštevanju sodelovanja v okviru obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996, podjetju Hoechst v skladu s prvo in drugo alineo razdelka D(2) obvestila odobri 50 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi podjetju bila naložena, če ne bi sodelovalo s Komisijo.
After due consideration of Nippon’s cooperation under the 1996 Leniency Notice, the Commission grants it, in accordance with the first and second indent of Section D(2) of that Notice, a 40 % reduction of the fine that would have been imposed if it had not cooperated with the Commission.
Komisija, ob upoštevanju sodelovanja v okviru obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996, podjetju Nippon v skladu s prvo in drugo alineo razdelka D(2) obvestila odobri 40 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi podjetju bila naložena, če ne bi sodelovalo s Komisijo.
After due consideration of Daicel’s cooperation under the 1996 Leniency Notice, and having taken into account the stage of the procedure when this cooperation took place, the Commission grants it, in accordance with the first and second indent of Section D(2) of that Notice, a 30 % reduction of the fine that would have been imposed if it had not cooperated with the Commission.
Komisija, ob upoštevanju sodelovanja v okviru obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996 in ob upoštevanju stopnje, na kateri je bil postopek, ko se je sodelovanje dogajalo, podjetju Daicel v skladu s prvo in drugo alineo razdelka D(2) obvestila odobri 30 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi podjetju bila naložena, če ne bi sodelovalo s Komisijo.
After due consideration of Ueno’s cooperation under the 1996 Leniency Notice, and having taken into account the stage of the procedure when this cooperation took place, the Commission grants it, in accordance with the first and second indent of Section D(2) of that Notice, a 25 % reduction of the fine that would have been imposed if it had not cooperated with the Commission.
Komisija, ob upoštevanju sodelovanja v okviru obvestila o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996 in ob upoštevanju stopnje, na kateri je bil postopek, ko se je sodelovanje dogajalo, podjetju Ueno v skladu s prvo in drugo alineo razdelka D(2) obvestila odobri 25 % zmanjšanje globe, ki bi podjetju bila naložena, če ne bi sodelovalo s Komisijo.
In conclusion, with regard to the nature of their cooperation and in the light of the conditions as set out in the 1996 Leniency Notice, the fines to be imposed on the addressees of this Decision should be reduced as follows:
Končno, z upoštevanjem narave sodelovanja podjetij in z vidika pogojev, določenih v obvestilu o prizanesljivosti iz leta 1996, se globe, naložene naslovnikom te odločbe, zmanjšajo na sledeči način:
Chisso: a reduction of 100 %,
Chisso: zmanjšanje za 100 %,
Daicel: a reduction of 30 %,
Daicel: zmanjšanje za 30 %,
Hoechst: a reduction of 50 %,
Hoechst: zmanjšanje za 50 %,
Nippon: a reduction of 40 %,
Nippon: zmanjšanje za 40 %,
Ueno: a reduction of 25 %.
Ueno: zmanjšanje za 25 %.
Arguments of Chisso and Ueno
Argumenti podjetij Chisso in Ueno
Chisso submits that its financial situation has deteriorated in recent years due to the severe and lasting economic crisis in Japan for over two decades and the immense financial exposure to Chisso for damages and clean up costs arising from the Minamata disease.
Chisso navaja, da se je finančno stanje podjetja v zadnjih letih poslabšalo zaradi resne in dolgotrajne gospodarske krize na Japonskem, ki traja več kot dve desetletji, in ogromne finančne izpostavljenosti podjetja za škodo in stroške čiščenja, ki so nastali zaradi bolezni Minamata.
In its submission made on 10 June 2003, Chisso further explains and describes its precarious financial position and provides the Commission with financial data.
V svojem predlogu, vloženem dne 10. junija 2003, Chisso nadalje razlaga in opisuje svoj negotov finančni položaj in Komisiji zagotavlja finančne podatke.
The Commission notes that Ueno failed to produce consolidated figures.
Komisija ugotavlja, da podjetje Ueno ni pripravilo konsolidiranih podatkov.
After having examined Ueno’s financial situation on the basis of non-consolidated figures, the Commission concludes that it is not appropriate to adjust the amount of the fine in Ueno’s case.
Komisija po preučevanju finančnega stanja podjetja Ueno na podlagi nekonsolidiranih podatkov zaključuje, da v primeru podjetja Ueno zneska globe ni primerno prilagoditi.
To take into account the adverse financial situation of an undertaking would be tantamount to conferring an unjustified competitive advantage on undertakings least well adapted to the conditions of the market.
Upoštevanje neugodnega finančnega stanja podjetja enakovredno priznavanju nepravične konkurenčne prednosti za podjetja, ki so najslabše prilagojena pogojem na trgu.
As the Commission does not impose a fine on Chisso, its argument is irrelevant.
Ker Komisija podjetju Chisso ne nalaga globe, je njihov argument nepomemben.
In conclusion, the fines to be imposed pursuant to Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 should be as follows:
Končno, globe, naložene v skladu s členom 23(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003, so naslednje:
Daicel Chemical Industries Ltd: EUR 16,6 million
Daicel Chemical Industries, Ltd: 16,6 milijonov EUR
Hoechst AG: EUR 99,0 million
Hoechst AG: 99,0 milijonov EUR
The Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co. Ltd: EUR 10,5 million
The Nippon Synthetic Chemical Industry Co. Ltd: 10,5 milijonov EUR
Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry Ltd: EUR 12,3 million
Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry, Ltd: 12,3 milijonov EUR
The undertakings listed shall immediately bring the infringements to an end, in so far as they have not already done so.
Navedena podjetja morajo takoj prenehati s kršitvijo, če tega do sedaj še niso storila.
They shall refrain from repeating any act or conduct as the infringement found in this case and from any act or conduct having the same or similar object or effect.
Vzdržati se morajo ponovitev katerega koli dejanja ali dejavnosti, kot je kršitev, odkrita v tem primeru v tem primeru, in katerega koli dejanja ali dejavnosti, ki ima enak ali podoben predmet ali učinek.
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets and marked with an asterisk.
Deli tega besedila so urejeni tako, da je zagotovljeno, da zaupne informacije niso razkrite; ti deli so v oglatih oklepajih ter označeni z zvezdico.
amending Decision 2005/363/EC concerning animal health protection measures against African swine fever in Sardinia, Italy
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/363/ES o ukrepih za zdravstveno varstvo živali pred afriško prašičjo kugo na Sardiniji, Italija
(notified under document number C(2005) 2110)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 2110)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/99/EC of 16 December 2002 laying down animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption [3], and particular Articles 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/99/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o predpisih v zvezi z zdravjem živali, ki urejajo proizvodnjo, predelavo, distribucijo in uvoz proizvodov živalskega izvora, namenjenih prehrani ljudi [3], in zlasti člena 4(3) Direktive,
Commission Decision 2005/363/EC of 2 May 2005 concerning animal health protection measures against African swine fever in Sardinia, Italy [4] was adopted in response to the presence of African swine fever in the province of Nuoro and part of the province of Sassari in Sardinia.
Odločba Komisije 2005/363/ES z dne 2. maja 2005 o ukrepih za zdravstveno varstvo živali pred afriško prašičjo kugo na Sardiniji, Italija [4], je bila sprejeta zaradi prisotnosti afriške prašičje kuge v provinci Nuoro in deloma v provinci Sassari na Sardiniji.
Italy has informed the Commission about the recent evolution of that disease in the provinces of Sassari and Oristano of Sardinia.
Italija je Komisijo obvestila o nedavnem razvoju navedene bolezni v provincah Sassari in Oristano na Sardiniji.
The areas of Sardinia as referred to in point (b)(i) of Article 5(2) of Decision 2005/363/EC that are excluded from the derogation foreseen in this Article that authorises the Italian authorities to dispatch pig meat under certain conditions should therefore be extended with the province of Oristano and the municipalities Calangianus, Sant’Antonio di Gallura, Telti of the province of Sassari.
Območja Sardinije, navedena v točki (b)(i) člena 5(2) Odločbe 2005/363/ES, ki so izvzeta iz odstopanja, predvidenega v tem členu, ki italijanskim organom dovoljuje odpošiljanje prašičjega mesa pod določenimi pogoji, je zato treba razširiti na provinco Orestano ter na občine Calangianus, Sant'Antonio di Gallura in Telti v provinci Sassari.
Decision 2005/363/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/363/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
JE SPREJELA NASLEDNJO ODLOČBO:
Annex I to Decision 2005/363/EC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2005/363/ES se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33; corrected version in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/41/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33) (Popravljena različica v UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
OJ L 118, 5.5.2005, p. 39.
UL L 118, 5.5.2005, str. 39.
Areas of Sardinia as referred to in point (b)(i) of Article 5(2)
Območja Sardinije, navedena v točki (b)(i) člena 5(2):
In the province of Nuoro: the whole territory.
v provinci Nuoro: celotno območje;
In the province of Sassari: the territory of the municipalities of Alà dei Sardi, Anela, Banari, Benetutti, Bessude, Bonnanaro, Bono, Bonorva, Borutta, Bottidda, Buddusò, Bultei, Burgos, Cheremule, Cossoine, Esporlatu, Giave, Illorai, Ittireddu, Mores, Nughedu di San Nicolò, Nule, Pattada, Siligo, Thiesi, Torralba, Calangianus, Sant'Antonio di Gallura, Telti.
v provinci Sassari: območje občin Alà dei Sardi, Anela, Banari, Benetutti, Bessude, Bonnanaro, Bono, Bonorva, Borutta, Bottidda, Buddusò, Bultei, Burgos, Cheremule, Cossoine, Esporlatu, Giave, Illorai, Ittireddu, Mores, Nughedu di San Nicolò, Nule, Pattada, Siligo, Thiesi, Torralba, Calangianus, Sant'Antonio di Gallura, Telti;
In the province of Oristano: the whole territory.’
v provinci Oristano: celotno območje.“
amending Decision 97/757/EC laying down special conditions governing imports of fishery and aquaculture products originating in Madagascar, as regards the competent authority and the model of health certificate
o spremembi Odločbe 97/757/ES o posebnih pogojih za uvoz ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov iz ribogojstva s poreklom iz Madagaskarja glede pristojnega organa in vzorca zdravstvenega spričevala
(notified under document number C(2005) 2513)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 2513)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products [1], and in particular Article 11(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/493/EGS z dne 22. julija 1991 o zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in dajanje na trg ribiških proizvodov [1], in zlasti člena 11(1) Direktive,
In Commission Decision 97/757/EC [2], the ‘Direction des Services vétérinaires (DSV) du ministère de l’élevage’, is identified as the competent authority in Madagascar for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with Directive 91/493/EEC.
V Odločbi Komisije 97/757/ES [2], je „Direction des Services vétérinaires (DSV) du Ministère de l’Elevage“ opredeljen kot pristojni organ na Madagaskarju za preverjanje in potrjevanje skladnosti ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov iz ribogojstva z zahtevami Direktive 91/493/EGS.
Following a restructuring of the Madagascar administration, the competent authority has changed to the ‘Direction de la santé animale et du phytosanitaire (DSAPS) du ministère de l’agriculture, de l’élevage et de la Pêche (MAEP)’.
Po preoblikovanju uprave Madagaskarja je postal pristojni organ „Direction de la Santé Animale et du Phytosanitaire (DSAPS) du Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Pêche (MAEP)“.
That new authority is capable of effectively verifying the application of the rules in force.
Navedeni novi organ je sposoben učinkovito preverjati izvajanje veljavnih predpisov.
The DSAPS has provided official assurances on compliance with the standards for health controls and monitoring of fishery and aquaculture products as set out in Directive 91/493/EEC and on the fulfilment of hygienic requirements equivalent to those laid down in that Directive.
DSAPS je predložil uradna zagotovila v zvezi s skladnostjo s standardi za zdravstveni nadzor in spremljanje ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov iz ribogojstva, določenih v Direktivi 91/493/EGS, in glede izpolnjevanja higienskih zahtev, enakih tistim iz navedene direktive.
Decision 97/757/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 97/757/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
It is appropriate for this Decision to be applied 45 days from the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union thereby providing for the necessary transitional period.
Primerno je, da se začne ta odločba uporabljati 45 dni po njeni objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, da se zagotovi potrebno prehodno obdobje.
Decision 97/757/EC is amended as follows:
Odločba 97/757/ES se spremeni:
The “Direction de la santé animale et du phytosanitaire (DSAPS) du ministère de l’agriculture, de l’élevage et de la pêche (MAEP)” shall be the competent authority in Madagascar for verifying and certifying compliance of fishery and aquaculture products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.’;
Direction de la Santé Animale et du Phytosanitaire (DSAPS) du Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Elevage et de la Pêche (MAEP) je pristojni organ na Madagaskarju za preverjanje in potrjevanje skladnosti ribiških proizvodov in proizvodov iz ribogojstva z zahtevami Direktive 91/493/EGS.“
Fishery and aquaculture products imported from Madagascar must meet the following conditions:
Ribiški proizvodi in proizvodi ribogojstva s poreklom iz Magadaskarja morajo izpolnjevati naslednje pogoje:
each consignment must be accompanied by a numbered original health certificate, duly completed, signed dated and comprsising a single sheet in accordance with the model in Annex A hereto;
vsako pošiljko mora spremljati oštevilčen izvirnik zdravstvenega spričevala, ki je pravilno izpolnjen, podpisan, datiran, ki obsega en sam list in je skladen z vzorcem v Prilogi A;
the products must come from approved establishments, factory vessels, cold store or registered freezer vessels listed in Annex B hereto;
proizvodi morajo izvirati iz odobrenih obratov, predelovalnih plovil, hladilnic ali registriranih zamrzovalnih plovil iz Priloge B k tej odločbi;
except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserve foods, all packages must bear the word “MADAGASCAR” and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters.’;
razen če gre za zamrznjene ribiške proizvode v razsutem stanju, namenjene za proizvodnjo konzervirane hrane, mora biti na vseh pošiljkah z neizbrisnimi črkami napisana beseda ‚MADAGASKAR’ in številka odobritve/registrska številka izvornega obrata, predelovalnega plovila, hladilnice ali zamrzovalnega plovila.“
Article 3(2) is replaced by the following:
Točka 2 člena 3 se nadomesti z naslednjim: