natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission therefore confirms its assessment as set out in points 25 to 32 of its letter of 18 March 2004.
Komisija torej potrjuje svojo presojo, kot je razložena v točkah 25 do 32 njenega dopisa z dne 18. marca 2004.
The advantages in question are linked to expenses that are not eligible for aid under any of the block exemption regulations or Community guidelines.
Zadevne ugodnosti so povezane s stroški, ki niso upravičeni do pomoči na podlagi nobene od uredb o skupinskih izjemah ali smernic Skupnosti.
With special reference to participation in trade fairs, Article 5(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid [7] [8] provides that aid for participation in trade fairs is only admissible if it does not exceed 50 % of the eligible costs and for the first participation by an SME in a particular fair or exhibition, while the tax incentive in question concerns all companies and all costs associated with taking part in any trade fairs abroad.
S posebnim sklicevanjem na udeležbo na sejmih člen 5(b) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri de minimis pomoči [7] [8] določa, da je pomoč za udeležbo na sejmih dopustna samo, če ne presega 50 odstotkov upravičenih stroškov in za prvo udeležbo malega ali srednjega podjetja na določenem sejmu ali razstavi, medtem ko se zadevna davčna spodbuda nanaša na vsa podjetja in vse stroške, povezane z udeležbo na kakršnih koli sejmih v tujini.
The exceptions provided for in Article 87(2) of the EC Treaty, which concern aid of a social character granted to individual consumers, aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences and aid granted to certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany, do not apply in this case.
Izjeme, določene v členu 87(2) Pogodbe ES, ki se nanašajo na pomoč socialnega značaja, dodeljeno posameznim potrošnikom, pomoč za povrnitev škode, ki so jo povzročile naravne nesreče ali izjemni dogodki, in pomoč, dodeljeno nekaterim območjem Zvezne republike Nemčije, se v tem primeru ne uporabljajo.
Neither does the scheme qualify for the exception allowed by Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty for aid to promote the economic development of areas where the standard of living is abnormally low or where there is serious underemployment.
Prav tako program ni upravičen do izjeme, ki jo dovoljuje člen 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES za pomoč za pospeševanje gospodarskega razvoja območij, kjer je življenjska raven izjemno nizka ali kjer je podzaposlenost velika.
In the same way, the scheme cannot be considered to be a project of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in Italy’s economy, as provided for by Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty; nor does it have as its object the promotion of culture and heritage conservation as provided for by Article 87(3)(d) of the EC Treaty.
Programa tudi ni mogoče obravnavati kot projekt skupnega evropskega interesa ali za odpravljanje resne motnje v gospodarstvu Italije, kot to določa člen 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES, niti ni njegov cilj pospeševanje kulture in ohranjanje kulturne dediščine, kot je to določeno členu 87(3)(d) Pogodbe ES.
Finally, the scheme in question must be examined in the light of Article 87(3)(c) of the EC Treaty.
Nazadnje je treba zadevni program preučiti na podlagi člena 87(3)(c) Pogodbe ES.
This Article provides for the authorisation of aid to facilitate the development of certain economic activities or of certain economic areas, where such aid does not adversely affect trading conditions to an extent that is contrary to the common interest.
Ta člen predvideva odobritev pomoči za pospeševanje razvoja določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti ali določenih gospodarskih območij, kadar takšna pomoč ne spreminja trgovinskih pogojev v obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
The tax advantages granted by the scheme are not linked to specific investments, job creation or specific projects.
Davčne ugodnosti, ki jih dodeljuje program, niso povezane s posebnimi naložbami, ustvarjanjem delovnih mest ali posebnimi projekti.
They simply constitute a reduction in the costs that would normally have to be borne by the firms concerned in the course of their export business and must therefore be regarded as export linked operating aid.
Preprosto pomenijo zmanjšanje stroškov, ki bi jih zadevna podjetja po navadi morala nositi pri svojem izvoznem poslovanju, in jih je zato treba obravnavati kot pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, povezano z izvozom.
In line with the Commission’s standard practice, such aid is considered to be incompatible with the common market.
V skladu s standardno prakso Komisije se taka pomoč šteje za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom.
The Commission observes furthermore that, even if the measure were found to facilitate the development of certain economic activities, such as the internationalisation of Italian businesses, and thus result in increased volumes of trade, the Commission cannot rule out the possibility that the extent of the relative effects on intra-Community trade would be contrary to the common interest.
Komisija nadalje navaja, da četudi bi bilo ugotovljeno, da ukrep pospešuje razvoj določenih gospodarskih dejavnosti, kot je internacionalizacija italijanskih podjetij, kar bi torej povečalo obseg trgovanja, Komisija ne more izključiti možnosti, da bi bil obseg relativnih učinkov na trgovino v Skupnosti v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi.
CONCLUSIONS
SKLEP
The Commission concludes that the tax incentives granted under this measure constitute operating aid that does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the prohibition and is therefore incompatible with the common market.
Komisija ugotavlja, da davčne spodbude, dodeljene na podlagi tega ukrepa, pomenijo pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ki ni upravičena do nobene od izjem glede prepovedi in je torej nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
The Commission also finds that Italy has illegally implemented the measure in question.
Komisija tudi ugotavlja, da je Italija zadevni ukrep uveljavila nezakonito.
Where illegally granted state aid is found to be incompatible with the common market, the natural consequence of such a finding is that the aid should be recovered from the beneficiaries.
Kadar se za nezakonito dodeljeno državno pomoč ugotovi, da je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom, je smiselna posledica take ugotovitve, da morajo upravičenci pomoč vrniti.
Through recovery of the aid, the competitive position that existed before the aid was granted is restored as far as possible.
Z vračilom pomoči se konkurenčno stanje, ki je obstajalo pred dodelitvijo pomoči, obnovi v čim večji možni meri.
Although the present procedure was closed before the end of the tax year in which the scheme is in force and therefore before the tax liability of most beneficiaries has become definitive, the Commission cannot rule out the possibility that firms may already have benefited from the aid in terms, for example, of lower part payments of taxes relating to the current tax year.
Čeprav je bil ta postopek zaključen pred koncem davčnega leta, v katerem velja program, in torej preden je davčna obveznost večine upravičencev postala dokončna, Komisija ne more izključiti možnosti, da so podjetja že morda koristila pomoč v smislu, na primer, nižjih delnih plačil davkov, ki se nanašajo na tekoče davčno leto.
The Commission notes that, following the opening of the formal investigation, the Italian authorities publicly warned the scheme’s potential beneficiaries of the possible consequences should the Commission find that the measure in question constituted incompatible aid.
Komisija navaja, da so po sprožitvi formalne preiskave italijanski organi uradno opozorili potencialne upravičence programa na morebitne posledice, če bi Komisija ugotovila, da zadevni ukrep pomeni nezdružljivo pomoč.
The Commission nevertheless considers it necessary that, in order to recover any aid already made available to the beneficiaries, Italy should enjoin the potential beneficiaries of the scheme, within two months of the adoption of this Decision, to reimburse the aid with interest in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [9].
Vendar Komisija vseeno meni, da je za vračilo kakršne koli pomoči, ki je upravičencem že bila dana na razpolago, nujno, da Italija v dveh mesecih od sprejetja te odločbe prejemnikom ukaže, da povrnejo pomoč z obrestmi v skladu z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 794/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [9].
In particular, where the aid has been already made available through reductions in payments of taxes due for the current tax year, Italy must collect the entire tax due by means of the final scheduled payment for 2004.
Zlasti mora Italija tam, kjer je bila pomoč že dana na razpolago z znižanji plačil davkov za tekoče davčno leto, pobrati celotni zapadli davek z zadnjim odmerjenim plačilom za leto 2004.
In any event, full recovery must be completed at the latest by the end of the first tax year following the date of notification of the present Decision.
Vsekakor je treba celotno vračilo končati najpozneje do konca prvega davčnega leta po datumu uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi.
Italy must provide the Commission, using the questionnaire in the Annex to this Decision, with a list of the beneficiaries concerned and indicate clearly the measures planned and already taken to secure immediate and effective recovery of the illegal state aid.
Italija mora Komisiji predložiti seznam zadevnih prejemnikov ter jasno navesti načrtovane in že sprejete ukrepe za zagotovitev takojšnjega in učinkovitega vračila nezakonite državne pomoči, pri čemer uporabi vprašalnik iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Within two months of the adoption of this Decision, all documents giving evidence that recovery proceedings have been initiated against the beneficiaries of the illegal aid (such as circulars, recovery orders, etc.) must also be transmitted to the Commission.
V dveh mesecih od sprejetja te odločbe je treba Komisiji poslati tudi vse dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da so bili zoper prejemnike nezakonite pomoči uvedeni postopki za vračilo (kot so okrožnice, nalogi za povračilo itd.).
This Decision concerns the scheme as such and must be implemented immediately, including recovery of aid granted under the scheme.
Ta odločba se nanaša na program kot tak in jo je treba izvršiti nemudoma, vključno z vračilom pomoči, dodeljene na podlagi programa.
However, it is without prejudice to the possibility that all or part of the aid granted in individual cases may be deemed compatible, in particular under Article 5(b) of the Block Exemption Regulation for SMEs,
Vendar pa ne vpliva na možnost, da se lahko celotna pomoč ali del pomoči, dodeljene v posameznih primerih, šteje za združljivo, zlasti na podlagi člena 5(b) uredbe o skupinskih izjemah za mala in srednja podjetja –
The state aid scheme in the form of tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad, provided for by Article 1(1)(b) of Decree-Law No 269 of 30 September 2003, which Italy has unlawfully put into effect in breach of Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty, is incompatible with the common market.
Program državne pomoči v obliki davčnih spodbud za podjetja, ki sodelujejo na sejmih v tujini, ki je določen v členu 1(1)(b) Zakonskega odloka št. 269 z dne 30. septembra 2003 in ki ga je Italija nezakonito začela izvajati v nasprotju s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES, je nezdružljiv s skupnim trgom.
Italy shall abolish the aid scheme referred to in the first paragraph.
Italija ukine program pomoči iz prvega odstavka.
Italy shall take the necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlawfully made available to them.
Italija sprejme potrebne ukrepe za vračilo s strani prejemnikov pomoči iz člena 1, ki jim je bila nezakonito dana na razpolago.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law.
Vračilo se opravi nemudoma in v skladu s postopki nacionalne zakonodaje.
Where the aid has already been made available by means of lower part payments of taxes due for the current tax year, Italy shall collect the entire tax due by means of the final scheduled payment for 2004.
Kjer je bila pomoč že dana na razpolago z nižjimi delnimi plačili davkov za tekoče davčno leto, Italija pobere celotni zapadli davek z zadnjim odmerjenim plačilom za leto 2004.
In all other cases, Italy shall recover the tax due at the latest by the end of the first tax year following the date of notification of this Decision.
V vseh drugih primerih Italija izterja zapadli davek najpozneje do konca prvega davčnega leta po datumu uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi.
The aid to be recovered shall bear interest, running from the date on which it was first put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until its actual recovery and calculated in accordance with the Articles 9, 10 and 11 of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
Za pomoč, ki jo je treba vrniti, se zaračunajo obresti, ki tečejo od dne, ko je bila prvič dana na razpolago upravičencem, do njenega dejanskega vračila in se izračunajo v skladu s členi 9, 10 in 11 Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004.
Within two months of the date of notification of this Decision, Italy shall inform the Commission, using the questionnaire in the Annex to the Decision, of the measures taken to comply with it.
V dveh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila o tej odločbi Italija obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih za ravnanje v skladu z njo, pri čemer uporabi vprašalnik iz Priloge k Odločbi.
Within the same period of time as that referred to in the first paragraph, Italy shall:
V istem obdobju, kot je navedeno v prvem odstavku, Italija:
enjoin all beneficiaries of the aid referred to in Article 1 to reimburse the illegal aid, with interest;
ukaže vsem prejemnikom pomoči iz člena 1, da povrnejo nezakonito pomoč z obrestmi;
transmit all documents giving evidence that the recovery proceedings have been initiated against the beneficiaries of the illegal aid.
pošlje vse dokumente, ki dokazujejo, da so bili zoper prejemnike nezakonite pomoči uvedeni postopki za vračilo.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Italy.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Italijo.
OJ C 221, 3.9.2004, p. 2.
UL C 221, 3.9.2004, str. 2.
Judgment of the Court of 10 December 1969 joined Cases 6 and 11/69 Commission of the European Communities v French Republic [1969] ECR 523; Judgment of the Court of 7 June 1988 Case 57/86 Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1988] ECR 2855; Judgment of 15 July 2004 Case C-501/00 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [2004] ECR I-6717.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 10. decembra 1969 v združeni zadevi 6/69 in 11/69 Komisija Evropskih skupnosti proti Francoski republiki [1969] PSES 523; sodba Sodišča z dne 7. junija 1988 v zadevi 57/86 Helenska republika proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1988] PSES 2855; sodba z dne 15. julija 2004 v zadevi C-501/00 Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti, poročila še ni.
See, for instance, Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 1998 Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities [1998] ECR II-717.
Glej, na primer, sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 30. aprila 1998 v zadevi T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flamska regija) proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1998] PSES II-717.
Judgment of the Court of 21 March 1990 Case C-142/87 Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities [1990] ECR I-959.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1990 v zadevi C-142/87 Kraljevina Belgija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1990] PSES I-959.
The text contains a material error.
V besedilu je vsebinska napaka.
This sentence should read: ‘With special reference to participation in trade fairs, Article 5(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid to small and medium-sized enterprises […]’.
Ta stavek se mora glasiti: „S posebnim sklicevanjem na udeležbo na sejmih člen 5(b) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 70/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri pomoči za majhna in srednje velika podjetja…“.
The Regulation is to be found in OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 33 and not p. 1 as incorrectly stated at the end of footnote 7.
Uredba je na voljo v UL L 10, 13.1.2001, na str. 33 in ne na str. 1, kakor nepravilno navaja opomba 7.
OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p. 1.
UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str. 1.
Information regarding the implementation of the Commission Decision on aid scheme C 12/04 — Italy — Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad
Informacije o izvajanju Odločbe Komisije o programu pomoči C12/2004 – Italija – Davčne spodbude za podjetja, ki sodelujejo na sejmih v tujini
Total number of beneficiaries and total amount of aid to be recovered
Skupno število prejemnikov in skupni znesek pomoči za vračilo
Please explain in detail how the amount of aid to be recovered from individual beneficiaries will be calculated
Podrobno navedite, kako bo izračunan znesek pomoči, ki ga je treba izterjati od posameznih prejemnikov:
The principal
Glavnica;
The interest.
Obresti.
What is the total amount of unlawful aid granted under this scheme that is to be recovered (gross aid equivalent; at … prices)?
Kakšen je skupni znesek nezakonite pomoči, dodeljene na podlagi tega programa, ki ga je treba vrniti (bruto ekvivalent pomoči; po … cenah)?
What is the total number of beneficiaries from whom unlawful aid granted under this scheme is to be recovered?
Kakšno je skupno število prejemnikov, od katerih je treba izterjati nezakonito pomoč, dodeljeno na podlagi tega programa?
Measures already taken and planned to recover the aid
Že sprejeti in načrtovani ukrepi za vračilo pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures have already been taken and what measures are planned to ensure immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Podrobno navedite, kateri ukrepi so že bili sprejeti, in kateri ukrepi so načrtovani za zagotovitev takojšnjega in učinkovitega vračila pomoči.
Please also indicate where relevant the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Kjer je ustrezno, navedite tudi pravno podlago za sprejete/načrtovane ukrepe.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Kdaj bo vračilo pomoči končano?
Information by individual beneficiary
Podatki o posameznih prejemnikih
Please provide details for each beneficiary from whom unlawful aid granted under the scheme is to be recovered in the table overleaf.
V tabelo na drugi strani vpišite podatke o vsakem prejemniku, od katerega je treba izterjati nezakonito pomoč, dodeljeno na podlagi tega programa.
Identity of the beneficiary
Identiteta prejemnika
Amount of unlawful aid granted [1]Currency: ….
Znesek dodeljene nezakonite pomoči [1]Valuta: ….
Amounts reimbursed [2]Currency: ….
Vrnjeni zneski [2]Valuta: ….
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in gross aid equivalent; at … prices).
Znesek pomoči, ki je bil upravičencu dan na razpolago (bruto ekvivalent pomoči; po … cenah)
(°) Gross amounts reimbursed (including interest).
(°) Bruto vrnjeni zneski (vključno z obrestmi)
The Commission decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, with an invitation to interested parties to submit their observations [3]. No comments were received.
Sklep Komisije, da bo sprožila formalni postopek preiskave, je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti s pozivom zainteresiranim strankam, da predložijo svoje pripombe [3].
on a State aid implemented by Germany for a meat processing company, Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH
o državni pomoči Nemčije za mesnopredelovalni obrat Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH
(notified under document number C(2005) 2725)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 2725)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above [1] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu vsem zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [1], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
The measure was notified in accordance with Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty by letter of 6 November 1997.
Ukrep je bil priglašen z dopisom z dne 6. novembra 1997, sklicujoč se na člen 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
It appeared that the beneficiary had already received a related aid at an earlier stage.
Upravičenec je podobno pomoč očitno prejel že v preteklosti.
Therefore, the measure was registered as non-notified aid.
Zato je bil ukrep vključen na seznam pomoči, ki niso priglašene.
By letters dated 4 February 1998, 10 June 1998 and 4 February 1999 Germany provided the Commission with further information.
Z dopisi z dne 4. februarja 1998, 10. junija 1998 in 4. februarja 1999 je Nemčija Komisiji posredovala dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 7 June 1999 the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid.
Z dopisom z dne 7. junija 1999 je Komisija Nemčiji sporočila, da bo zaradi zadevne pomoči sprožila postopek po členu 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, naj predložijo svoje pripombe.
The Commission received comments from interested parties.
Prispele pripombe so bile posredovane Nemčiji s prošnjo za odgovor.
It forwarded them to Germany, which was given the opportunity to react; its comments were received by letter dated 23 February 2000.
Pripombe Nemčije so prispele z dopisom z dne 23. februarja 2000.
By letter of 18 May 2005, registered as received on 23 May 2005, Germany asked the Commission to take a Decision on the basis of the information available to it, pursuant to Article 7(7) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [3].
Z dopisom z dne 18. maja 2005, prispelim dne 23. maja 2005, je Nemčija, sklicujoč se na člen 7(7) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [3], Komisijo zaprosila, naj sprejme odločbo na podlagi informacij, ki jih ima na razpolago.
DESCRIPTION
OPIS UKREPA
The benefiting company, Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH, was a meat-processing company producing and marketing several kinds of sausages and meat products.
Upravičeno podjetje, Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH, je bilo mesnopredelovalni obrat, ki je proizvajalo in tržilo različne salame in mesne izdelke.
The beneficiary did not slaughter animals itself but processed meat.
Podjetje ni klalo živine, temveč je predelovalo zaklano meso.
According to information provided by Germany, the insolvency procedure was initiated for Greußener Salamifabrik on 1 October 1999.
Po informacijah, ki jih je posredovala Nemčija, je bil 1. oktobra 1999 sprožen stečajni postopek o premoženju podjetja Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH.
The Commission was not informed about the outcome of the procedure.
Komisija o rezultatih postopka ni bila obveščena.
However, it would appear that at least the assets of the company are still operating under the name ‘Greußener Salami- und Schinkenfabrik GmbH’.
Zdi pa se, da so vsaj obrati podjetja, pod imenom „Greußener Salami- und Schinkenfabrik GmbH“, še naprej delovali.
The remarks of the present Decision, however, refer to the pre-insolvency company Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH.
Pripombe v obravnavani odločbi pa se nanašajo na podjetje Greußener Salamifabrik GmbH, ki je pozneje šlo v stečaj.
A steady decrease in the turnover of Greußener Salamifabrik led to losses and to a negative operating cash flow from 1995 onwards.
Nenehno upadanje prihodka je pripeljalo do tega, da je imelo podjetje od leta 1995 izgubo in da je bil denarni tok od leta 1995 negativen.