natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Short-, medium- and long-term debts to credit institutions and bonds.
Kratkoročni, srednjeročni in dolgoročni dolgovi, ki se knjižijo v dobro ustanovam in obveznicam.
Law No 58/90 of 7 September 1990 on the activity of television broadcasting.
Zakon št. 58/90 z dne 7. septembra 1990 glede dejavnosti radiotelevizije.
On 17 March 1993 a public service contract (Old Public Service Contract) was signed between the Portuguese State and RTP.
Med portugalsko državo in RTP je bila dne 17. marca 1993 podpisana pogodba za izvajanje javne službe (Stara pogodba za izvajanje javne službe).
On 31 December 1996 it was replaced by the New Public Service Contract.
Dne 31. decembra 1996 jo je nadomestilo Nova pogodba za izvajanje javne službe.
RTP has: (a) to respect the principles of freedom, independence, non-discrimination and non-concentration; (b) to safeguard its independence from the public authorities; and (c) to adapt programmes to quality and variety requirements in the interests of the public.
RTP mora: (a) spoštovati načelo svobode, neodvisnosti, prepovedi razlikovanja in prepovedi koncentracije; (b) ščititi svojo neodvisnost pred državnimi organi; in (c) v interesu javnosti sprejeti programe, glede na zahteve kakovosti in raznolikosti.
RTP has: (a) and (c) to contribute to enlightening, informing and educating the population; (b) to guarantee news coverage: (d) to (h) to make broadcasting time available for official messages, religious events, political parties, trade unions, the government and the public administration; (i) to broadcast two general coverage programmes, one of which should cover the Autonomous Regions of Madeira and the Azores; (j) and (m) to broadcast programmes on education, training, sport and culture; (l) to support and promote the cinema; (n) to keep audiovisual files; (o) to exchange programmes and information with Madeira and the Azores; (p) to produce and broadcast programmes for Portuguese communities abroad; (q) to cooperate with Portuguese-speaking countries; (r) to ensure direct coverage of main events abroad; (s) to maintain contacts with other European public service television broadcasters; and (t) to ensure that television broadcasting is in conformity with the guidelines laid down by the competent international bodies.
RTP mora: (a) in (c) prispevati k prosveti, obveščanju in poučevanju javnosti; (b) zagotoviti pokrivanje novic: (d) do (h) omogočiti programski čas za uradna sporočila, verske dogodke, politične stranke, sindikate, vlado in javno upravo; (i) oddajati dva glavna programa, pri čemer bi moral eden od njiju pokrival avtonomne regije Madeire in Azorov; (j) in (m) oddajati programe izobraževanja, usposabljanja, športa in kulture; (l) podpirati kinematografe; (n) ohraniti avdiovizualne arhive; (o) izmenjati programe z Madeiro in Azori; (p) pripraviti in oddajati programe za portugalske skupnosti v tujini; (q) sodelovati s portugalsko govorečimi državami; (r) zagotoviti neposredno pokrivanje pomembnih dogodkov v tujini; (s) vzdrževati stike z evropskimi javnimi službami radiotelevizije; in (t) zagotoviti, da je televizijsko oddajanje v skladu s smernicami pristojnih mednarodnih organov.
Clause 4 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clauses 4 and 5 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 4 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzuli 4 ter 5 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Clauses 5 to 8 and 10 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clauses 6 to 13 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 5-8 in 10 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzule 6-13 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Clause 1 of the Old Public Service Contract stated that the aim of the contract was to lay down the terms under which RTP would provide the public television service.
Klavzula 1 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe je določala, da je cilj pogodbe določiti pogoje, pod katerimi bi RTP zagotovil javno službo televizije.
Clause 1 of the New Public Service Contract states that RTP is the sole provider of public service broadcasting within the meaning of Article 5 of Law No 58/90 and Article 4 of Law No 21/92.
Klavzula 1 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe določa, da je RTP edini oskrbovalec javne službe radiotelevizije v smislu člena 5 Zakona št. 58/90 in člena 4 Zakona št. 21/92.
Clause 9 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 23 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 9 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzula 23 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Clauses 15, 16, 18 and 19 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clauses 18 and 25 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzule 15, 16, 18 in 19 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzuli 18 in 25 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Clause 19 of the Old Public Service Contract, Clause 25 of the New Public Service Contract and Article 47(2) of Law 31-A/98.
Klavzula 19 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe, klavzula 25 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in člen 47(2) Zakona št. 31-A/98.
Clause 13 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 20 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 13 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzula 20 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Clause 12 of the Old Public Service Contract lays down in detail which costs can be compensated for and how they are to be calculated: the coverage differential (the difference in costs borne by RTP Channel 1 and the costs borne by the largest private television operator), the operating deficit in the Autonomous Regions, the deficit in running the audiovisual library, the operational cost of RTP-International, the cost of operating the structure for cooperation with the Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOPs), the cost of allowing viewing time for certain entities, the cost of delegations and correspondents, and the costs of the S. Carlos National Theatre Foundation.
Klavzula 12 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe podrobno določa, kateri stroški se lahko kompenzirajo in kako se izračunajo: diferencialno pokritje (razlika med stroški RTP kanala 1 in stroški največjih zasebnih televizijskih operaterjev), primanjkljaj v poslovanju avtonomnih regij, primanjkljaj v avdiovizualni knjižnici, stroški poslovanja mednarodne RTP, strošek delovanja strukture sodelovanja s portugalsko govorečimi afriškimi državami (PALOP), strošek zagotavljanja programskega časa za določene pravne osebe, strošek predstavnikov in dopisnikov in stroški nacionalne gledališke ustanove S. Carlos.
Clause 15 of the New Public Service Contract lays down in detail which costs can be compensated for and how they are to be calculated.
Klavzula 15 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe podrobno določa, kateri stroški se lahko kompenzirajo in kako se izračunajo.
The items to be covered are: the operating costs of RTP 1 and RTP 2; specific services referred to in Clause 7(a) to (l); and the coverage differential.
Postavke, ki so pokrite so: stroški poslovanja RTP 1 in RTP 2, določene storitve, na katere se sklicuje klavzula 7(a) do (l) in diferencialno pokritje.
Information provided by the Portuguese authorities by letter of 31 March 1999.
Podatki, ki so jih posredovali portugalski organi oblasti s pismom dne 31. marca 1999.
Clause 14(2) of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 14(2) Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Excluding the cost associated with the coverage differential.
Izključujoč stroške v povezavi z diferencialnostjo pokritja.
Clause 19(1) and (3) of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzuli 19(1) in (3) Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
The New Public Service Contract provided that the operating costs of RTP 2 could be compensated for retroactively from 1 January 1996.
Nova pogodba za izvajanje javne službe določa, da se lahko od 1. januarja 1996 retroaktivno kompenzirajo stroški poslovanja RTP 2.
Although Sport TV is not a public service activity eligible for compensation, RTP deducted the profits of Sport TV from the public service cost.
RTP je dobiček od Šport TV odbil od stroškov javne službe, čeprav Šport TV ni dejavnost javne službe, ki bi bila primerna za kompenzacijo.
The basis for this is Article 47(3) of Law No 31-A/98 of 14 July 1998, which provides that profits made by RTP from participation in other channels are to be used for the financing of public service initiatives.
Za to je podlaga v členu 47(3) Zakona št. 31-A/98 z dne 14. julija 1998, ki določa, da se dobički, ki jih RTP ustvari z udeležbo v drugih kanalih uporabijo za financiranje pobud javnih služb.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2000 in Case T-46/97 SIC v Commission [2000] ECR II-2125.
Sodba sodišča prve stopnje z dne 10. maja 2000 v primeru T-46/97 SIC proti Komisiji [2000] PSES II-2125.
NN 141/95 Financing of the Portuguese public television service (OJ C 67, 4.3.1997, p. 10).
NN 141/95 Financiranje portugalske javne službe televizije (UL C 67, 4.3.1997, str. 10).
Decree-Law No 91/A/77 annulled the 1976 Statutes of RTP and stipulated that RTP would be governed by an Administrative Council.
Uredba z zakonsko močjo št. 91/A/77 je razveljavila statut RTP iz leta 1976 in sklenila, da bo RTP vodil upravni svet.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2001 in Case C-53/00 Ferring SA v Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS), [2001] ECR I-9067.
Glej sodbo Sodišča z dne 22. novembra 2001, primer C-53/00 Ferring SA proti Agence centrale des organismes de sécurité sociale (ACOSS) [2001] PSES I-9067.
Clauses 3 and 4 of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzuli 3 in 4 Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe z dne 31. decembra 1996.
According to Clause 14 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 21(3) of the New Public Service Contract, ‘Participation in the above-mentioned investments shall be covered preferably by the first contracting party and as shareholder in the form of an increase in capital’.
V skladu s klavzulo 14 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe iz 1993 in klavzulo 21(3) Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe iz 1996: „Udeležba v zgoraj navedenih vlaganjih se po možnosti pokrije s strani prve pogodbene stranke in kot delničarja v obliki povečanja kapitala.“
Point 10 of the Commission notice on the application of the state aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation (OJ C 384, 10.12.1998, p. 3).
Točka 10 obvestila Komisije o uporabi pravil državne pomoči za ukrepe v zvezi z neposredno obdavčitvijo poslovanja (UL C 384, 10.12.1998, str. 3).
See in this respect the definition of a public undertaking given in Article 2(1)(b) of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/72 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 75).
Glede tega glej opredelitev javnega podjetja v členu 2(1)(b) Direktive Komisije 2000/52/ES z dne 26. julija 2000, ki spreminja Direktivo 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji (UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 75).
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 1996 in Case T-358/94 Compagnie Nationale Air France v Commission.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 12. decembra 1996 v zadevi primer T-358/94 Compagnie Nationale Air France proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1996] PSES II-2109.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 1999 in Case C-342/96 Kingdom of Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-0000, paragraph 46.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 29. aprila 1999 v primeru C-342/96 Kraljevina Španija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1999] PSES I-2459, odstavek 46.
Ibidem, paragraph 48.
Ibidem, odstavek 48.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 16 May 2002 in Case C-482/99 Republic of France v Commission.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 16. maja 2002 v primeru C-482/99 Republika Francija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2002] PSES I-4397.
By letter of 16 June 2003, the Commission specifically requested information on the indicators given by the Court of Justice in Case C-482/99.
S pismom z dne 16. junija 2003 je Komisija izrecno zaprosila za informacije o indikatorjih, ki jih je podalo Sodišče v primeru C-482/99.
See judgment of the Court of Justice of 2 February 1988 in joined cases 67, 68, and 70/85 Kwekerij Gebroeders van Der Kooy v Commission [1988] ECR 219, paragraph 37.
Glej primer 70/85 – Sodba Sodišča z dne 2. februarja 1988 v primerih 67, 68 in 70/85 Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy BV in drugi proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1988] PSES 219, odstavek 37.
Judgment by the Court of Justice of 17 February 1993 in Joined Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Christian Poucet v Assurances Générales de France and Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon [[1993] ECR I-637.
Sodba sodišča z dne 17. februarja 1993 v združeni zadevi C-159/91 in C 160/91 Christian Poucet proti Assurances Générales de France et Caisse Mutuelle Régionale du Languedoc-Roussillon [1993] PSES I-637.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 June 1999 in Case C-295/97 Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA v International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH and Ministero della Difesa [1999] ECR I-3735, paragraph 35.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. junija 1999 v primeru C-295/97 Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA proti International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH et Ministero della Difesa [1999] PSES I-3735, odstavek 35.
See point 1.2 of the Commission notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to state aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 71, 11.3.2000, p. 14).
Glej točko 1.2 obvestila Komisije glede uporabe členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki garancij (UL C 71, 11.3.2000, str. 14).
As laid down in Article 4(3)(l) of Law No 21/92, in Clause 5(1)(j) of the Old Public Service Contract and in Clause 7(1)(m) of the New Public Service Contract.
Kot je določeno v členu 4(3)(l) Zakona št. 21/92, v klavzuli 5(1)(j) Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe iz 1993 in v klavzuli 7(1)(m) Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe iz 1996.
Article 5 of Law No 21/92.
Člen 5 Zakona št. 21/92.
Letter from the Portuguese authorities of 14 December 1995.
Pismo portugalskih organov oblasti z dne 14. decembra 1995.
Law 91/A/77 stipulated that an Administrative Council should govern RTP on account of its structural crisis.
Zakon 91/A/77 je določal, da bi moral upravni svet upravljati RTP zaradi njenih strukturnih težav.
Case C-342/96.
Primer C-342/96.
NN 141/95, Financing of the Portuguese public television service (OJ C 67, 4.3.1997, p. 10).
NN 141/95 Financiranje portugalske javne službe radiotelevizije (UL C 67, 4.3.1997, str. 10).
Case T-46/97, paragraph 50.
Primer T-46/97, odstavek 50.
Commission communication on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p. 3).
Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS za javna podjetja v proizvodnem sektorju (UL C 307, 13.11.1993, str. 3).
The reference rate is based on the five-year interbank swap rate plus a premium (OJ C 273, 9.9.1997, p. 3).
Referenčna mera temelji na petletni medbančni swap meri s prišteto premijo (UL C 273, 9.9.1997, str. 3).
The reference rates for Portugal since 1 January 1997 can be found at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html.
Za Portugalsko se lahko referenčne mere od 1. januarja 1997 poiščejo na http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/state_aid/others/reference_rates.html.
See judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2002 in joined Cases T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 and T-300/00 Métropole Télévision SA (M6) (T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) and SIC - Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) v Commission of the European Communities [2002] p. II-3805.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 8. oktobra 2002 v združenih zadevah T-185/00, T-216/00, T-299/00 in T-300/00 Métropole Télévision SA (M6)(T-185/00), Antena 3 de Televisión, SA (T-216/00), Gestevisión Telecinco, SA (T-299/00) et SIC – Sociedade Independente de Comunicação, SA (T-300/00) proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2002] PSES II-3805.
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, when aid strengthens the position of an undertaking compared with other undertakings competing in intra-Community trade, the latter must be regarded as affected by that aid.
Glede na precedens Sodišča, ko pomoč okrepi položaj podjetja v primerjavi z drugimi podjetji, ki konkurirajo na notranjem trgu Skupnosti, se slednji morajo upoštevati, kot prizadeti zaradi pomoči.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1980 in Cases 730/79 Philip Morris Holland v Commission of the European Communities [1980] ECR 671, paragraph 11; judgment of the Court of Justice of 21 March 1991 in Case C-303/88 Republic of Italy v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 17; judgment of the Court of Justice of 19 September 2000 in Case C-156/98 Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities [2000] p. I-6857, paragraph 33.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 1980 v primeru 730/79 Philip Morris Holland proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1980] PSES 2671, odstavek 11; sodba Sodišča z dne 21. marca 1991 v primeru C-303/88 Republika Italija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [1991] PSES I-1433, odstavek 17; sodba Sodišča z dne 19. septembra 2000 v primeru C-156/98 Zvezna republika Nemčija proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti [2000] PSES I-6857, odstavek 33.
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH et Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [2003] p. I-7747.
Sodba Sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (še ni objavljena v Poročilu Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti).
Ibidem, paragraphs 101 to 109.
Ibidem, odstavki 101 do 109.
In those paragraphs the Court examined the question of whether some state payments to transport undertakings classified as state aid could be found to be compatible with the common market under Article 77 of the Treaty as reimbursement for the discharge of public service obligations.
V teh odstavkih je sodišče preučilo vprašanje, če so nekatera državna plačila prevoznim podjetjem, ocenjena kot državna pomoč lahko združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 77 Pogodbe, kot povračilo za opravljanje obveznosti javne službe.
It did not rule out this possibility, provided that the binding conditions laid down by the secondary legislation for the transport sector were met.
Te možnosti ni izključilo, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjeni zavezujoči pogoji, ki jih določa sekundarna zakonodaja.
This reasoning must apply mutatis mutandis to undertaking entrusted with an SGEI outside the transport sector and in relation to Article 86(2).
Ta razlaga se mora uporabljati smiselno za podjetja, ki so zadolžena za SGEI, izven prevoznega sektorja in v povezavi s členom 86(2).
See paragraph 29 of the communication on broadcasting.
Glej odstavek 29 sporočila o radioteleviziji.
The Protocol considers that the system of public broadcasting is directly related to the democratic, social and cultural needs of each society and to the need to preserve media pluralism.
Protokol upošteva, da je sistem javne radiotelevizije neposredno povezan z demokratičnimi, socialnimi in kulturnimi potrebami vsake družbe in s potrebo ohranitve medijskega pluralizma.
More specifically, Member States have ‘the competence […] to provide for the funding of public service broadcasting insofar as such funding is granted to broadcasting organisations for the fulfilment of the public service remit as conferred, defined and organised by each Member State, and in so far as such funding does not affect trading conditions and competition in the Community to an extent which would be contrary to the common interest, while the realisation of the remit of that public service shall be taken into account’.
Bolj natančno imajo države članice „pristojnost omogočanja denarnih sredstev za javno službo radiotelevizije, pod pogojem, da so takšna odobrena denarna sredstva organizacijam radiotelevizije, zaradi izpolnjevanja javne službe, podeljena, določena in organizirana s strani vsake države in pod pogojem, da takšna denarna sredstva ne vplivajo na pogoje trgovine in konkurenco v Skupnosti, v meri, ki bi bila v nasprotju s skupnimi interesi, medtem, ko se bo upoštevala realizacija te javne službe.“
See paragraph 33 of the communication.
Glej odstavek 33 sporočila.
Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ L 298, 17.10.1989, p. 23).
Direktiva Sveta 89/552/EGS z dne 3. oktobra 1989 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov (UL L 298, 17.10.1989, str. 23).
According to Article 5, ‘Member States shall ensure […] that broadcasters reserve at least 10 % of their transmission time […], or alternately, […], at least 10 % of their programming budget, for European works created by producers who are independent of broadcasters.’Furthermore, according to recital 45 to Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, ‘the objective of supporting audiovisual production in Europe can be pursued within the Member State through the definition of a public interest mission for certain broadcasting organisations, […] including the obligation to contribute substantially to investment in European production’ ( OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60).
V skladu s členom 5: „Države članice z ustreznimi sredstvi zagotovijo, da […] izdajatelji televizijskega programa vsaj 10 % svojega oddajnega časa […], ali namesto tega, […], najmanj 10 % svojega programskega proračuna evropskim delom, ki jih ustvarjo producenti, neodvisni od izdajateljev televizijskih programov.“Poleg tega v skladu z opisom 45 k Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/36/ES z dne 30. junija 1997, ki spreminja Direktivo Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov (UL L 202, 30.7.1997, str. 60), kar je „cilj spodbujanja evropske avdiovizualne produkcije v državah članicah možno zasledovati v okviru organizacije njihovih javnih televizijskih servisov, […] vključno z njihovo obveznostjo, da pomembno prispevajo k investiranju v evropsko produkcijo.“.
Clause 13 of the Old Public Service Contract and Clause 7(1)(a) of the New Public Service Contract.
Klavzula 13 Stare pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe in klavzula 7(1)(n) Nove pogodbe za izvajanje javne službe.
Letter of the Portuguese authorities of 30 June 1999.
Pismo portugalskih organov oblasti z dne 30. junija 1999.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraph 40.
Sporočilo o radioteleviziji, odstavek 40.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraphs 57 and 58.
Sporočilo o radioteleviziji, odstavka 57 in 58.
The operating costs of the first and second channel under the Old Public Service Contract correspond to the financing costs and the costs of correspondence where other operators were also set up.
Stroški poslovanja prvega in drugega kanala, v skladu s Staro pogodbo za izvajanje javne službe odgovarjajo finančnim stroškom in stroškom korespondence, kjer so bili ustanovljeni tudi drugi operaterji.
Communication on broadcasting, paragraph 58.
Sporočilo o radioteleviziji, odstavek 58.
Paragraph 91 of the decision initiating the procedure.
Odstavek 91 sklepa o uvedbi postopka.