natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was found that one of the exporting producers paid a commission to its related importer for activities linked to export sales of SWR made directly by the exporting producer to the independent customers in the Community.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je eden od proizvajalcev izvoznikov plačal provizijo svojemu povezanemu uvozniku za dejavnosti, povezano z izvozno prodajo JŽV; proizvajalec izvoznik je neposredno prodajal neodvisnim strankam v Skupnosti.
Since the commission paid was considered as a factor having an impact on price and price comparability within the meaning of Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, the sales under consideration were adjusted accordingly.
Ker je bila plačana provizija upoštevana kot dejavnik, ki je vplival na ceno in primerljivost cene v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe, je bila zadevna prodaja ustrezno prilagojena.
Two exporting producers claimed an adjustment on both domestic and export sales for differences in other factors, consisting of the cost incurred by the company for the inspection fees and outside processing (incorporation of fittings) of certain sales in order to meet customers’ requirements.
Dva proizvajalca izvoznika sta zahtevala prilagoditev tako pri domači kot izvozni prodaji za razlike v drugih dejavnikih, kot so stroški, ki so družbi nastali zaradi inšpekcijskih taks in zunanje predelave (vgradnja fitingov) določene prodaje, da se zadovoljijo zahteve strank.
It was considered more appropriate to grant this claim as an adjustment for differences in physical characteristics.
Zdelo se je primernejše, da se ta zahtevek odobri kot prilagoditev za razlike v fizikalnih lastnostih.
The amount of the adjustment corresponds to the actual price paid by the exporting producers for the inspection fees and outside processing costs.
Znesek prilagoditve ustreza dejanski ceni, ki so jo plačali proizvajalci izvozniki za inšpekcijske takse in stroške zunanje predelave.
Finally one of the exporting producers claimed an adjustment for differences in the level of trade in accordance with Article 2(10)(d) of the basic Regulation.
Nazadnje je en zadevni proizvajalec izvoznik zahteval prilagoditev za razlike v stopnji trgovine v skladu s členom 2(10)(d) osnovne uredbe.
However, sales on the domestic market were made to national distributors.
Vendar se je blago na domačem trgu prodalo državnim distributerjem.
This is a level of trade similar to the level of trade of sales to the related importer after reconstruction of the export price.
Ta stopnja trgovine je primerljiva s stopnjo prodaje povezanemu uvozniku po rekonstrukciji izvozne cene.
Consequently, no adjustment was warranted.
Zato ni odobrena nobena prilagoditev.
Dumping margin for the companies investigated
Stopnja dampinga za preiskovane družbe
According to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, for each exporting producer the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price per product type, as determined above.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe se je za vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika primerjala tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost s tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno na vrsto izdelka, kot je določeno zgoraj.
On the basis of the above, the dumping margin for the cooperating exporting producers, expressed as a percentage of the cif net free-at-Community-frontier price, before duty are:
Na podlagi zgoraj navedenega je stopnja dampinga za sodelujoče proizvajalce izvoznike, izražena kot odstotek vrednosti CIF na neto ceno franko na meji Skupnosti, pred plačilom dajatve, naslednja:
Regarding those cooperating exporters not included in the sample, it was found that, for the bulk of their sales, their export prices were generally in line with those of the sampled exporters.
V zvezi s temi sodelujočimi izvozniki, ki niso bili vključeni v vzorec, je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile za pretežni del njihove prodaje izvozne cene na splošno v skladu s cenami vzorčenih izvoznikov.
In the absence of any information indicating the contrary, it was considered that the sampling results are representative for all other exporters.
Ker ni bilo drugih podatkov, ki bi kazali nasprotno, se je menilo, da so rezultati vzorčenja za vse druge izvoznike reprezentativni.
Moreover, it is noted that both the other cooperating exporters and the non-cooperating exporters each accounted for approximately 0,5 % of Community consumption in the IP.
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti, da tako za druge sodelujoče izvoznike kot nesodelujoče izvoznike potrošnja Skupnosti v OP znašala približno 0,5 %.
For these reasons, it was considered that any impact of these imports, even if they were above the de minimis level of dumping, would not have been such as to, in isolation, cause injury to the Community industry.
Zaradi tega se je štelo, da tak uvoz, tudi če bi bil nad ravnjo dampinga de minimis, sam po sebi ne bi povzročil škodo industriji Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, an anti-dumping proceeding shall be terminated where it is determined that the margin of dumping is less than 2 %.
V skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe se zaključi protidampinški postopek, kjer je določeno, da je stopnja dampinga manjša od 2 %.
Consequently and given the above findings, the present proceeding should be terminated.
Zaradi tega in glede na zgornje ugotovitve se ta postopek zaključi.
Given the above determinations with regard to dumping, and in accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation, i.e. that where dumping margins were found to be de minimis a proceeding shall be terminated immediately, it was not considered necessary to conclude on injury, causation and Community interest aspects,
Glede na zgornje določitve v zvezi z dampingom in v skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe, tj. če je ugotovljeno, da je stopnja dampinga de minimis, se postopek nemudoma zaključi, se ni zdelo potrebno, da se sklepna ugotovitev določi glede na vidike škode, vzročne zveze in industrije Skupnosti –
The anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of ropes and cables, including locked coil ropes, of iron or steel but not stainless steel, with a maximum cross-sectional dimension exceeding 3 mm, with attached fittings or not, falling within CN codes 73121082, 73121084, 73121086, 73121088 and 73121099 and originating in the Republic of Korea is hereby terminated.
Protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom jeklenih vrvi in kablov, vključno z zaprtimi svitki vrvi, iz železa ali jekla, vendar ne iz nerjavnega jekla, z največjim prečnim prerezom več kot 3 mm, opremljenih s priborom (fitingi) ali brez, uvrščenih pod oznake KN 73121082, 73121084, 73121086 in 73121088 in 73121099 in s poreklom iz Republike Koreje, se zaključi.
The Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Ta odločba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Done at Brussels, 20 October 2005.
V Bruslju, 20. oktobra 2005
OJ C 283, 20.11.2004, p. 6.
UL C 283, 20.11.2004, str. 6.
OJ L 217, 17.8.1999, p. 63.
UL L 217, 17.8.1999, str. 63.
OJ L 238, 25.9.2003, p. 13.
UL L 238, 25.9.2003, str. 13.
OJ L 238, 25.9.2003, p. 1.
UL L 238, 25.9.2003, str. 1.
OJ L 211, 4.8.2001, p. 1.
UL L 211, 4.8.2001, str. 1.
OJ L 34, 3.2.2001, p. 4.
UL L 34, 3.2.2001, str. 4.
OJ L 211, 4.8.2001, p. 47.
UL L 211, 4.8.2001, str. 47.
OJ L 348, 21.12.2002, p. 80.
UL L 348, 21.12.2002, str. 80.
OJ L 180, 18.7.2003, p. 34.
UL L 180, 18.7.2003, str. 34.
OJ L 120, 24.4.2004, p. 1.
UL L 120, 24.4.2004, str. 1.
OJ L 328, 30.10.2004, p. 1.
UL L 328, 30.10.2004, str. 1.
OJ C 272, 13.11.2003, p. 2.
UL C 272, 13.11.2003, str. 2.
OJ L 211, 4.8.2001, p. 1 (recital 25).
UL L 211, 4.8.2001, str.1 (uvodna izjava (25))
The measures applying to these imports consisted of an ad valorem duty, except for one Czech, one Russian, one Thai and two Turkish exporting producers from which undertakings were accepted by Commission Regulation (EC) No 230/2001 [8] and Commission Decision 2001/602/EC [9]. The two undertakings from Turkish exporting producers have been withdrawn by Commission Regulations (EC) No 2303/2002 [10] and No 1274/2003 [11].
Ukrepi, ki veljajo za ta uvoz, so vključevali dajatev ad valorem, razen za enega češkega, ruskega, tajskega in dva turška proizvajalca izvoznika, katerih zaveze so bile sprejete z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 230/2001 [8] in Sklepom Komisije 2001/602/ES [9] Z uredbama Komisije (ES) št. 2303/2002 [10] in (ES) št. 1274/2003 [11] sta bili umaknjeni obe zavezi turških proizvajalcev izvoznikov.
amending Decision 2005/693/EC concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia
o spremembi Odločbe 2005/693/ES o nekaterih ukrepih zaščite v zvezi z aviarno influenco v Rusiji
(notified under document number C(2005) 4176)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4176)
Having regard to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [2], and in particular Article 22 (1) and (5) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [2], in zlasti člena 22(1) in (5) Direktive,
Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal and public health and to reduce sharply the profitability of poultry farming.
Aviarna influenca je kužna virusna bolezen pri perutnini in ptičih, ki povzroča smrt in motnje, ki lahko hitro dobijo epizootske razsežnosti ter so lahko resna nevarnost za zdravje živali in ljudi ter lahko znatno zmanjšajo donosnost reje perutnine.
Commission Decision 2005/693/EC of 6 October 2005 concerning certain protection measures in relation to avian influenza in Russia [3] was adopted following outbreaks of avian influenza in Russia.
Odločba Komisije 2005/693/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2005 o nekaterih ukrepih zaščite v zvezi z aviarno influenco v Rusiji [3] je bila sprejeta po izbruhih aviarne influence v Rusiji.
That Decision suspends the importation of birds, other than poultry, from Russia.
Navedena odločba začasno ustavlja uvoz ptic, razen perutnine, iz Rusije.
In addition, Decision 2005/693/EC suspends the importation of unprocessed feathers and unprocessed parts of feathers from those regions of Russian listed in Annex I to that Decision.
Poleg tega Odločba 2005/693/ES začasno ustavlja uvoz nepredelanega perja in delov peres iz področij v Rusiji, naštetih v Prilogi I k navedeni odločbi.
However, the importation of unprocessed feathers and parts of unprocessed feathers, are still authorised from those regions of Russia not listed in Annex I to that Decision, subject to certain conditions, including those regions located west of the Ural mountains, in which outbreaks had not occurred at the date of adoption of Decision 2005/693/EC.
Vendar je uvoz nepredelanega perja in delov peres pod določenimi pogoji še vedno dovoljen iz tistih področij v Rusiji, ki niso našteta v Prilogi I k navedeni odločbi, vključno s tistimi področji, ki so zahodno od Urala, kjer ni bilo izbruhov bolezni na dan sprejetja Odločbe 2005/693/ES.
On 19 October 2005, Russia informed the Commission that an outbreak of avian influenza has occurred in Tula, in the Central Federal District of Russia, in which no outbreaks had been previously reported and from which unprocessed feathers and parts of unprocessed feathers may still be imported, in accordance with Decision 2005/693/EC.
Rusija je 19. oktobra 2005 Komisijo obvestila, da je prišlo do izbruha ptičje gripe v Tuli, osrednjem ruskem zveznem okrožju, kjer prej izbruhi niso bili zabeleženi in iz katerega še vedno lahko pride do uvoza nepredelanega perja in delov peres v skladu z Odločbo 2005/693/ES.
In relation to the recent outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza A virus of subtype H5N1 in Turkey, Romania and Russia, circumstantial evidence and molecular epidemiology data strongly suggest that the avian influenza virus has spread into those third countries proceeding from central Asia via migratory birds.
V zvezi z nedavnimi izbruhi visoko patogene aviarne influence v Turčiji, Romuniji in Rusiji, ki jo povzroča virus influence A seva H5N1, posredni dokazi in podatki molekularne epidemiologije izrazito nakazujejo, da se je virus aviarne influence razširil na navedene tretje države iz osrednje Azije s pticami selivkami.
This is also suggested by the report of a recent mission to Russia carried out by the World Organization for Animal Health (O.I.E.), that was published on 14 October 2005.
To nakazuje tudi poročilo o nedavni misiji Mednarodnega urada za živalske kužne bolezni (O.I.E.) v Rusiji, ki je bilo objavljeno 14. oktobra 2005.
The importation into the Community of unprocessed feathers and parts of unprocessed feathers should therefore be banned from those regions of Russia where the outbreak of avian influenza has recently occurred or which are at particular risk, in accordance with current knowledge on the flyways of migratory brids proceeding from the areas in central Asia and Siberia where the disease has been recorded.
Uvoz nepredelanega perja in delov peres v Skupnost je zato treba prepovedati iz tistih ruskih zveznih okrožij, kjer je nedavno prišlo do izbruha aviarne influence ali kjer je tveganje za to znatno, v skladu z obstoječim znanjem o selitvenih poteh ptic selivk, ki letijo iz področij osrednje Azije in Sibirije, kjer je bila bolezen zabeležena.
Annex I to Commission Decision 2005/693/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo I k Odločbi 2005/693/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Annex I of Decision 2005/693/EC the following points 4, 5, 6 and 7 are added:
Prilogi I k Odločbi 2005/693/ES se dodajo točke 4, 5, 6 in 7:
Central Federal District
Osrednje zvezno okrožje
Includes the following Subjects of the Russian Federation: Belgorod Oblast, Bryansk Oblast, Ivanovo Oblast, Kaluga Oblast, Kostroma Oblast, Kursk Oblast, Lipetsk Oblast, Moscow (federal city), Moscow Oblast, Oryol Oblast, Ryazan Oblast, Smolensk Oblast, Tambov Oblast, Tver Oblast, Tula Oblast, Vladimir Oblast, Voronezh Oblast, Yaroslavl Oblast.
Vključeni so naslednji subjekti Ruske federacije: pokrajina Belgorod, pokrajina Bryansk, pokrajina Ivanovo, pokrajina Kaluga, pokrajina Kostroma, pokrajina Kursk, pokrajina Lipetsk, Moskva (mesto), pokrajina Moskva, pokrajina Oryol, pokrajina Ryazan, pokrajina Smolensk, pokrajina Tambov, pokrajina Tver, pokrajina Tula, pokrajina Vladimir, pokrajina Voronezh, pokrajina Yaroslavl.
Southern Federal District
Južno zvezno okrožje
Includes the following Subjects of the Russian Federation: Adygeya Republic, Astrakhan Oblast, Chechnya Republic, Dagestan Republic, Ingushetia Republic, Kabardino-Balkaria Republic, Kalmykia Republic, Karachay-Cherkessia Republic, Krasnodar Krai, North Ossetia-Alania Republic, Stavropol Krai, Rostov Oblast, Volgograd Oblast.
Vključeni so naslednji subjekti Ruske federacije: republika Adygeya, pokrajina Astrakhan, republika Čečenija, republika Dagestan, republika Ingušetija, republika Kabardino-Balkaria, republika Kalmykia, republika Karachay-Cherkessia, regija Krasnodar, republika Severna Osetija-Alania, regija Stavropol, pokrajina Rostov, pokrajina Volgograd.
Northwestern Federal District
Severozahodno zvezno okrožje
Includes the following Subjects of the Russian Federation: Arkhangelsk Oblast, Komi Republic, Novgorod Oblast, Pskov Oblast, Vologda Oblast.
Vključeni so naslednji subjekti Ruske federacije: pokrajina Arkhangelsk, republika Komi, pokrajina Novgorod, pokrajina Pskov, pokrajina Vologda.
Privolzhsky (Volga) Federal District
Zvezno okrožje Privolzhsky (Volga)
Includes the following Subjects of the Russian Federation: Bashkortostan Republic, Chuvashia Republic, Kirov Oblast, Mari El Republic, Mordovia Republic, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, Orenburg Oblast, Penza Oblast, Perm Oblast, Permyakia Autonomous District, Samara Oblast, Saratov Oblast, Tatarstan Republic, Udmurtia Republic, Ulyanovsk Oblast.’
Vključeni so naslednji subjekti Ruske federacije: republika Bashkortostan, republika Chuvashia, pokrajina Kirov, republika Mari El, republika Mordovia, pokrajina Nizhny Novgorod, pokrajina Orenburg, pokrajina Penza, pokrajina Perm, avtonomno okrožje Permyakia, pokrajina Samara, pokrajina Saratov, republika Tatarstan, republika Udmurtia, pokrajina Ulyanovsk.“
Directive as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu 2003.
amending Decision 2003/858/EC as regards the list of territories from which importation of certain species of live fish, their eggs and gametes intended for farming in the European Community is authorised
o spremembi Odločbe 2003/858/ES glede seznama ozemelj, s katerih je dovoljen uvoz nekaterih vrst živih rib, njihovih iker in zaroda, namenjenih za gojenje v Evropski skupnosti (ES)
(notified under document number C(2005) 3964)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 3964)
Commission Decision 2003/858/EC of 21 November 2003 laying down the animal health conditions and certification requirements for imports of live fish, their eggs and gametes intended for farming, and live fish of aquaculture origin and products thereof intended for human consumption [2], establishes a list of third countries or parts thereof from which imports of live fish, their eggs and gametes intended for farming in the Community are authorised.
Odločba Komisije 2003/858/ES z dne 21. novembra 2003 o pogojih zdravstvenega varstva živali in zahtevah za spričevala za uvoz živih rib, njihovih iker in zaroda, namenjenih za gojenje, ter živih rib in proizvodov iz ribogojstva, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi [2], določa seznam tretjih držav ali njihovih delov, iz katerih je dovoljeno uvažati žive ribe, njihove ikre in zarod za gojenje v Skupnosti.
The inclusion of the comment ‘carps only’ in the table in Annex I to Decision 2003/858/EC has led to different interpretations concerning the application of the Decision.
Vključitev opombe „samo krap“ v tabeli v Prilogi I k Odločbi 2003/858/ES je povzročila različne razlage glede uporabe Odločbe.
For the sake of clarity, that comment should therefore be made more precise from a taxonomical point of view to meet the aim of the Decision.
Zaradi jasnosti je zato treba ta komentar bolj natančno opredeliti z vidika taksonomije, da se zadosti cilju Odločbe.
It is also appropriate to simplify the presentation of the table in Annex I in order to avoid repeating the requirements set out in the model certificates.
Prav tako je primerno poenostaviti predstavitev tabele v Prilogi I, da bi se izognili ponavljanju zahtev, določenih v vzorcih spričeval.
Decision 2003/858/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2003/858/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex I to Decision 2003/858/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga I k Odločbi 2003/858/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/914/EC (OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 60).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/914/ES (UL L 385, 29.12.2004, str. 60).
Territories from which importation of certain species of live fish, their eggs, and gametes intended for farming in the European Community (EC) is authorised
Ozemlja, s katerih je dovoljen uvoz nekaterih vrst živih rib, njihovih iker in zaroda, namenjenih za gojenje v Evropski skupnosti (ES)
Comments [1]
Opombe [1]
ISO Code
Koda ISO
Cyprinidae only
Samo krapovci
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija
Malaysia (Peninsular, Western Malaysia only)
Malezija (samo polotoška, zahodna)
No limitations if left blank.
Če ni posebnih zahtev, se pusti prazen prostor.
If a country or territory is allowed to export certain species, and/or eggs or gametes, the species must be specified and/or a comment, for example, “eggs only” must be inserted in this column.
Ni omejitev, če se mesto pusti prazno. Če ima država ali ozemlje dovoljenje za izvoz samo nekaterih vrst in/ali iker ali zaroda, je vrste treba navesti in/ali v ta stolpec se vnese opomba na primer ‚samo ikre’.
Provisional code that does not affect the definitive denomination of the country to be attributed after the conclusion of the negotiations currently taking place in the United Nations.’
Začasna koda ne vpliva na dokončno ime, ki bo državi dodeljeno po zaključku pogajanj, ki se trenutno odvijajo v Združenih narodih.“
allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the new active substances boscalid, indoxacarb, spinosad and Spodoptera exigua nuclear polyhedrosis virus
o pooblastitvi držav članic za podaljšanje začasnih dovoljenj, izdanih za nove aktivne snovi boskalid, indoksakarb, spinosad in virus jedrne poliedričnosti Spodoptera enigua
(notified under document number C(2005) 4002)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4002)
Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [1], and in particular the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [1], in zlasti četrtega pododstavka člena 8(1) Direktive,
In accordance with Article 6(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC, in April 2001 Germany received an application from BASF AG for the inclusion of the active substance boscalid (former name: nicobifen) in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
V skladu s členom 6(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS je Nemčija aprila 2001 od podjetja BASF AG prejela zahtevek za vključitev aktivne snovi boskalid (prejšnje ime: nikobifen) v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Commission Decision 2002/268/EC [2] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2002/268/ES [2] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna ter načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve glede podatkov in informacij iz Prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In October 1997 the Netherlands received an application from DuPont de Nemours concerning indoxacarb (former name: DPX-KN128).
Oktobra 1997 je Nizozemska od podjetja DuPont de Nemours prejela zahtevek glede indoksakarba (prejšnje ime: DPX-KN128).
Commission Decision 98/398/EC [3] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 98/398/ES [3] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna ter načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve glede podatkov in informacij iz Prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In July 1999 the Netherlands received an application from Dow Agrosciences concerning spinosad.
Julija 1999 je Nizozemska od podjetja Dow Agrosciences prejela zahtevek glede spinosada.
Commission Decision 2000/210/EC [4] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 2000/210/ES [4] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna ter načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve glede podatkov in informacij iz Prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.
In July 1996 the Netherlands received an application from Biosys concerning Spodoptera exigua nuclear polyhedrosis virus.
Julija 1996 je Nizozemska od podjetja Biosys prejela zahtevek glede virusa jedrne poliedričnosti Spodoptera exigua.
Commission Decision 97/865/EC [5] confirmed that the dossier was complete and could be considered as satisfying, in principle, the data and information requirements of Annex II and Annex III to that Directive.
Odločba Komisije 97/865/ES [5] je potrdila, da je dokumentacija popolna ter načeloma izpolnjuje zahteve glede podatkov in informacij iz Prilog II in III k navedeni direktivi.