natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
Uporabljajo se določbe, ki veljajo za carinske dajatve.
OJ L 227, 23.8.2001, p. 56.
UL L 227, 23.8.2001, str. 56.
OJ C 154, 28.6.2002, p. 2.
UL C 154, 28.6.2002, str. 2.
OJ C 281, 22.11.2003, p. 4.
UL C 281, 22.11.2003, str. 4.
OJ C 43, 19.2.2004, p. 14.
UL C 43, 19.2.2004, str. 14.
See page 8 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 8 tega uradnega lista.
Decision on Anti-circumvention adopted by the Trade Negotiations Committee on 15 December 1993.
Sklep o preprečevanju izogibanja, ki ga je sprejel Odbor za trgovinska pogajanja dne 15. decembra 1993.
The company in question was subject to countervailing duty at 7 %.
Za zadevno družbo se je uporabljala izravnalna dajatev v višini 7 %.
OJ L 321, 22.10.2004, p. 26.
UL L 321, 22.10.2004, str. 26.
‘Terphane Ltda.’, BR 101, km 101, City of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, State of Pernambuco, Brazil (‘Terphane’) ;
„Terphane Ltda.“, BR 101, km 101, mesto Cabo de Santo Agostinho, država Pernambuco, Brazilija („Terphane“).
POB 8380, Israel (‘Jolybar’) ;
POB 8380, Izrael („Jolybar“).
‘Polyplex Corporation Limited’, B-37, Sector-1, Noida 201301, Dist.
„Polyplex Corporation Limited“, B-37, Sector-1, Noida 201301, Dist.
‘Flex Industries Limited’, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201301 (U.P.), India ,
„Flex Industries Limited“, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201301 (U.P.), Indija,
Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India .
Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, Indija.
‘Ester Industries Limited’, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part — I, New Delhi — 110003, India ,
„Ester Industries Limited“, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part – I, New Delhi – 110003, Indija,
Council Regulation (EC) No 1976/2004
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1976/2004
extending the definitive countervailing duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India to imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not
o razširitvi dokončnih izravnalnih dajatev, naloženih z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 na uvoz filma iz polietilen tereftalata (PET) s poreklom iz Indije, na uvoz filma iz polietilen tereftalata (PET), ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in iz Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2026/97 of 6 October 1997 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Article 23 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2026/97 z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o zaščiti pred subvencioniranim uvozom iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] („osnovna uredba“), in še posebej člena 23 te uredbe,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,
ob upoštevanju predloga, ki ga je posredovala Komisija po posvetovanju s svetovalnim odborom,
By Regulation (EC) No 2597/1999 [2] (the original Regulation), the Council imposed countervailing duties on imports of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film (PET film) originating in India.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 2597/1999 [2] („izvorna uredba“) je Svet naložil izravnalne dajatve na uvoz filma iz polietilen teraftalata (PET) („PET filma“) s poreklom iz Indije.
The rates of the countervailing duties ranged between 3,8 and 19,1 %.
Stopnje izravnalnih dajatev segajo od 3,8 % do 19,1 %.
Imports of PET film originating in India are also subject to anti-dumping duties, ranging between 0 and 62,6 %, imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1676/2001 [3].
Za uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije se uporabljajo protidampinške dajatve s stopnjami med 0 % in 62,6 %, naložene z Uredbo (ES) št. 1676/2001 [3].
On 28 June 2002, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [4], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Dne 28. junija 2002 je Komisija v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [4] objavila obvestilo o začetku, s katerim je najavila začetek 1. delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
The request is limited in scope to the form of the measure and in particular, to the examination of the acceptability of an undertaking offered by the applicant.
Obseg zahtevka je omejen na obliko ukrepa in, še posebej na preiskavo sprejemljivosti obveznosti, ki jo je ponudil vlagatelj.
On 22 November 2003, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [5], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 [6], limited in scope to the form of the anti-dumping measures.
Dne 22. novembra 2003 je Komisija v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [5] objavila obvestilo o začetku, s katerim je najavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96 [6], ki je v obsegu omejena na obliko protidampinških ukrepov.
On 19 February 2004, the Commission announced by a notice of initiation published in the Official Journal of the European Union [7], the initiation of a partial interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 limited to dumping for the Indian exporting producer Jindal Polyester Limited.
Dne 19. februarja 2004 je Komisija Uradnem listu Evropske unije [7] objavila obvestilo o začetku, s katerim je najavila začetek delnega vmesnega pregleda v skladu s členom 11(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 384/96, ki je omejena na damping indijskega proizvajalca-izvoznika Jindal Polyester Limited.
On 6 January 2004, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 23(2) of the basic Regulation (the request) from the Community producers DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH and Nuroll SpA (the applicants) to investigate the alleged circumvention of the countervailing measures imposed on imports of PET film originating in India.
Dne 6. januarja 2004 je Komisija prejela zahtevek v skladu s členom 23(2) osnovne uredbe („zahtevek“) proizvajalcev v Skupnosti DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH in Nuroll SpA („vlagatelji“) za preiskavo domnevnega izogibanja izravnalnim ukrepom, naloženim na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije.
The applicants represent a major proportion of the Community production of PET film.
Vlagatelji predstavljajo glavni delež proizvajalcev PET filmov v Skupnosti.
The applicants alleged and submitted sufficient evidence showing that, following the imposition of measures on imports of PET film originating in India, there had been significant changes in the patterns of trade involving exports of PET film from India, Brazil and Israel to the Community.
Vlagatelji so trdili in predložili zadostna dokazila, ki kažejo, da so nastale po naložitvi ukrepov na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije bistvene spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja v zvezi z izvozom PET filma iz Indije, Brazilije in Izraela v Skupnost.
These changes in the patterns of trade were alleged to stem from the transhipment via Brazil and via Israel of PET film originating in India.
Spremembe vzorca trgovanja so domnevno izvirale iz pretovarjanja PET filma s poreklom iz Indije preko Brazilije in preko Izraela.
It was alleged that there was insufficient due cause or economic justification for the aforementioned changes other than the imposition of duties on imports of PET film from India.
Trdili so, da ni drugega zadostnega upravičenega vzroka ali ekonomske upravičenosti za prej omenjene spremembe kot naložitev dajatev na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije.
Finally, the applicant alleged and submitted prima facie evidence that the remedial effects of this duty were being undermined both in terms of quantities and prices.
Končno so vlagatelji trdili in predložili verjetne dokaze ki kažejo, da so popravljalni učinki dajatev oslabljeni v smislu količine in cene.
It was claimed that significant volumes of imports of PET film from Brazil and Israel appear to have replaced imports of PET film originating in India.
Trdili so, da kaže, da so znatne količine uvoza PET filma iz Brazilije in Izraela nadomestile uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije.
In addition, the applicant submitted prima facie evidence that PET film originating in India continues to benefit from subsidies found to be countervailable in the original investigation.
Poleg tega so vlagatelji predložili verjetne dokaze, da ima PET film s poreklom iz Indije še naprej koristi od subvencij, za katere je bilo že v izvorni preiskavi ugotovljeno, da so izravnalne.
INITIATION
ZAČETEK
By Regulation (EC) No 283/2004 [8] (the initiating Regulation), the Commission initiated an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of countervailing measures on imports of PET film originating in India by imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not and, pursuant to Article 23(2) and Article 24(5) of the basic Regulation, directed the customs authorities to register imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not, as of 20 February 2004.
Z Uredbo (ES) št. 283/2004 [8] („začetna uredba“) je Komisija začela preiskavo o morebitnem izogibanju izravnalnim ukrepom na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije z uvozom PET filma, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne, v skladu s členoma 23(2) in 24(5) osnovne uredbe in napotila carinske organe, da registrirajo uvoz PET filma, ki se pošilja iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela ali ne, z začetkom 20. februarja 2004.
At the same time, by Regulation (EC) No 284/2004 [9], the Commission also initiated an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures on imports of PET film originating in India by imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel, whether declared as originating in Brazil or Israel or not.
Sočasno je z Uredbo (ES) št. 284/2004 [9] Komisija začela tudi preiskavo o morebitnem izogibanju protidampinškim ukrepov na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije z uvozom PET filma, poslanega iz Brazilije in Izraela, ne glede na to, ali je deklariran kot s poreklom iz Brazilije ali Izraela, ali ne.
The findings of that investigation are presented in Council Regulation (EC) No 1975/2004 [10].
Ugotovitve preiskave so predstavljene v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. /2004 [10].
The Indian authorities indicated that they considered that anti-circumvention investigations were not permissible under either the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 or the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
Indijski organi so navedli, da štejejo preiskavo za preprečevanje izogibanja kot nedopustno po Sporazumu o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini 1994 oz. po Sporazumu o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih.
This claim was rejected on the grounds that the anti-circumvention provisions of the basic Regulation are not incompatible with the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
Zahtevek je bil zavrnjen na podlagi tega, da določbe proti izogibanju iz temeljne uredbe niso nezdružljive s Sporazumom o izvajanju člena VI Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini 1994 in Sporazuma o subvencijah in izravnalnih ukrepih.
Indeed, the Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations contains a Decision on anti-circumvention [11], referring the matter to the Committee on Anti-dumping Practices in the absence of an agreement on a specific text.
Še več, sklepna listina, ki vsebuje rezultate Urugvajskega kroga večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj vsebuje sklep o preprečevanju izogibanja [11] in prepušča zadevo odboru za protidampinško prakso, kadar dogovor o določenem besedilu ni bil dosežen.
As this Decision was made knowing that several WTO Members already had their own anti-circumvention legislation, the European Community interprets it as permitting individual Members to adopt or maintain provisions in this respect, pending the adoption of multilaterally agreed rules.
Ob sprejemu tega sklepa je bilo znano, da imajo številne članice STO že svojo lastno zakonodajo o preprečevanju izogibanja, zato jo Evropska skupnost tolmači kot dovoljenje posameznim članicam da prilagodijo ali vzdržujejo tozadevne predpise do prilagoditve večstransko dogovorjenih pravil.
The same principles should logically apply to anti-subsidy investigations.
Ista načela se uporabljajo pri protisubvencijskih preiskavah.
Questionnaires were sent to exporters/producers in India, Brazil and Israel which cooperated in the original investigation, were named in the request or subsequently became known to the Commission.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani izvoznikom-proizvajalcem v Indiji, Braziliji in Izraelu, ki so sodelovali v izvorni preiskavi, bili imenovani v zahtevku ali postali kasneje znani Komisiji.
Questionnaires were sent to importers in the Community which were named in the request or cooperated in the original investigation that led to the existing measures.
Vprašalniki so bili poslani uvoznikom v Skupnosti, ki so bili imenovani v zahtevku, ali ki so sodelovali v izvorni preiskavi, katere rezultat so obstoječi ukrepi.
All parties were informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 28 of the basic Regulation and to findings which, being made on the basis of the facts available, can be less favourable than if the party had cooperated.
Vse stranke so bile obveščene, da lahko nepripravljenost sodelovati povzroči uporabo člena 28 osnovne uredbe in privede do ugotovitev na osnovi dokazov na voljo, ki so lahko za stranko manj ugodni kot v primeru, da bi sodelovala.
Replies to the questionnaire were received from six exporters/producers in India from one exporter/producer in Brazil and from one processing company involved in slitting, sheeting and converting PET film in Israel and exporting PET film to the Community.
Odgovore na vprašalnik je poslalo šest izvoznikov-proizvajalcev iz Indije, en izvoznik-proizvajalec iz Brazilije in eno predelovalno podjetje, ki se ukvarja z razrezovanjem, valjanjem in preoblikovanjem PET filma v Izraelu ter z izvozom PET filma v Skupnost.
Another company in Israel came forward and explained that it processed PET film but that the resulting products were not exported under the CN codes under which PET film was classified.
Druga družba iz Izraela je razložila, da je predelovala PET film, da pa tako nastali izdelki niso bili izvažani pod oznakami KN, pod katere je uvrščen PET film.
On that basis, the company did not submit a questionnaire reply.
Na tej osnovi družba ni posredovala odgovora na vprašalnik.
Three of these reported that they had never imported PET film from either Brazil or Israel.
Trije od teh so poročali, da nikoli niso uvažali PET filma iz Brazilije ali Izraela.
The other two importers stated that they had not imported Indian PET film from Brazil or from Israel during the investigation period.
Druga dva uvoznika sta trdila, da nista nikoli uvažala indijskega PET filma iz Brazilije ali iz Izraela v času obdobja preiskave.
The Commission carried out verification visits at the premises of the following companies:
Komisija je z obiskom na kraju poslovanja preverila naslednje družbe:
Brazilian exporting producer:
Brazilski proizvajalci-izvozniki:
‘Terphane Ltda’ BR 101, km 101, City of Cabo de Santo Agostinho, State of Pernambuco, Brazil (‘Terphane’)
Terphane Ltda BR 101, km 101, mesto Cabo de Santo Agostinho, država Pernambuco, Brazilija („Terphane“) .
7, Ind. Park Siim 2000, Natania South, 42504, POB 8380, Israel (‘Jolybar’)
Park Siim 2000, Natania South, 42504. POB 8380, Izrael („Jolybar“) .
Indian exporting producers:
Indijski proizvajalci-izvozniki:
‘Ester Industries Limited’, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part — I, New Delhi — 110 003, India
Ester Industries Limited, 75-76, Amrit Nagar, Behind South Extension Part – I, New Delhi – 110003, Indija
‘Flex Industries Limited’, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201 301 (U.P.), India
Flex Industries Limited, A-1, Sector 60, Noida 201301 (U.P.), Indija
‘Jindal Polyester Limited’, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
Jindal Polyester Limited, 56 Hanuman Road, New Delhi 110001, Indija
The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 (the IP).
Obdobje preiskave je krilo obdobje od 1. januarja 2003 do 31. decembra 2003 („OP“).
Data was collected from 1998 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged changes in the pattern of trade.
Podatki so se zbirali od leta 1998 naprej do konca OP, da bi se preiskale domnevne spremembe v vzorcu trgovanja.
As stated in recital 12, six exporters/producers of PET film in India cooperated with the investigation by submitting questionnaire replies.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi (12), je šest proizvajalcev-izvoznikov PET filmov v Indiji sodelovalo v preiskavi s posredovanjem odgovora na vprašalnike.
Information was also obtained from one exporting producer of PET film in Brazil and from one processing company slitting, sheeting and converting PET film in Israel.
Podatki so bili pridobljeni tudi od proizvajalca–izvoznika PET filmov v Braziliji ter od ene predelovalne družbe, ki se ukvarja z razrezovanjem, valjanjem in preoblikovanjem PET filma v Izraelu.
These Brazilian and Israeli companies accounted for a minor part (less than 1 % and around 5 %, respectively) both in volume and in value, of the total imports of PET film from those countries to the Community during the IP as reported by Eurostat.
Te brazilske in izraelska družba so predstavljale samo majhen delež (manj kot 1 % oziroma okoli 5 %) obsega in vrednosti, skupnega uvoza PET filma iz držav v Skupnost v OP po obvestilu Eurostata.
The Indian authorities made a written submission further to the initiation of the investigation and provided statistical information concerning exports of PET film from India to, inter alia, the Community.
Indijski organi so na podlagi uvedbe preiskave predali pisno poročilo s statističnimi informacijami o izvozu PET filma iz Indije v, med drugim, Skupnost.
Statistical data concerning exports of PET film from Brazil to the Community were also obtained from the Brazilian national database.
Statistični podatki o izvozu PET filma iz Brazilije v Skupnost so bili pridobljeni tudi iz brazilske nacionalne podatkovne zbirke.
The Indian Government also submitted information identifying the schemes used by the companies subject to measures which were still extant.
Indijska vlada je posredovala informacije za razpoznavanje shem, ki jih uporabljajo družbe, za katere se uporabljajo še vedno veljavni ukrepi.
The product concerned is, as defined in the original investigation, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film originating in India, normally declared under CN codes ex39206219 and ex39206290 (the product concerned).
Zadevni izdelek je, kot je definirano v izvorni preiskavi, polietilenski tereftalatni (PET) film s poreklom iz Indije, običajno deklariran pod oznakami KN ex39206219 in ex39206290 („zadevni izdelek“).
It is considered that PET film exported to the Community from India and PET film consigned from Brazil and from Israel to the Community has the same basic characteristics and the same uses.
Šteje se, da ima PET film, ki se v Skupnost izvaža iz Indije, ter PET film, ki se v Skupnost pošilja iz Brazilije in Izraela, enake osnovne značilnosti ter enake uporabe.
Therefore, they are considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(5) of the basic Regulation.
Zato veljata za enaka izdelka v smislu člena 1(5) osnovne uredbe.
Over the period 1999 to 2003, imports of the product concerned represented 96,5 % of total imports from India under the relevant CN codes.
V obdobju 1999–2003 so uvozi zadevnega izdelka predstavljali 96,5 % uvoza iz Indije, označenega pod ustreznimi oznakami KN.
Market analysis was therefore carried out using Eurostat data at CN code level.
Tržna analiza je bila torej opravljena s pomočjo uporabe podatkov Eurostata na ravni oznak KN.
In 1999 countervailing duties were imposed on imports to the Community of PET film originating in India, prompting a decrease in volumes of such imports from 11700 tonnes in 1998 to 10600 tonnes in 1999.
V letu 1999 so bile naložene izravnalne dajatve na uvoz PET filma s poreklom iz Indije v Skupnost, po čemer je sledil upad obsega uvoza iz 11700 ton v letu 1998 na 10600 ton v letu 1999.
In 2000 imports recovered to 11600 tonnes but this was followed by the imposition of anti-dumping measures in 2001 which led to a decrease of imports to 6100 tonnes.
V letu 2000 se je uvoz popravil na 11600 ton, vendar je leta 2001 sledila uvedba protidampinških ukrepov, po kateri je uvoz upadel na 6100 ton.
Since then imports gradually recovered and stood at 11500 tonnes during the IP.
Uvoz se od takrat postopoma popravlja in je v času OP dosegel 11500 ton.
In respect of the above pattern it is noted that one company had a significantly lower cumulative duty [12] rate than the other producers.
Glede na zgornji vzorec je ugotovljeno, da je imela ena družba bistveno nižjo skupno carinsko dajatev [12] v primerjavi z ostalimi proizvajalci.
This company’s trading pattern followed a markedly different trend to that of the other producers, increasing its share of all Indian exports of the product concerned to the Community hugely between the imposition of countervailing measures and the IP.
Trend vzorca trgovanja te družbe je bil bistveno drugačen od trenda ostalih proizvajalcev, saj se je delež vseh indijskih izvozov zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost bistveno povišal v času med uvedbo izravnalni ukrepov in OP.
Notably, between 2000 and 2001, when anti-dumping measures were introduced, this company massively increased its share of all Indian exports to the Community.
Opazno je bilo, da je med leti 2000 in 2001, ko so bili uvedeni protidampinški ukrepi, ta družba znatno okrepila svoj delež vseh indijskih izvozov v Skupnost.
Discounting this irregular trend, the total volume of the product concerned imported into the Community remained well below that prior to the imposition of countervailing measures.
Ne glede na to izjemo je celotna količina zadevnega izdelka, uvoženega v Skupnost, ostala znatno nižja od tiste pred uvedbo izravnalnih ukrepov.
They indicated that they considered that the official Indian statistics did not suggest any circumvention of the existing countervailing measures by the Indian PET film producers.
Navedli so, da menijo, da uradna indijska statistika ne navaja, da bi se indijski proizvajalci PET filma izogibali obstoječim protidampinškim ukrepom.
However, the data referred to is inconsistent with the export data provided by the cooperating Indian exporters, at least as far as exports to Israel are concerned; these data show increasing volumes of trade from India to Israel from 2000 through to 2003.
Vendar pa se navedeni podatki ne ujemajo z izvoznimi podatki, ki so jih posredovali sodelujoči indijski izvozniki, vsaj kar zadeva izvoze v Izrael; ti podatki kažejo na povišan obseg trgovanja iz Indije v Izrael od leta 2000 pa vse do 2003.
As far as Brazil is concerned, Indian export data for direct exports to Brazil shows an increase from around 460 tonnes in 1998 to over 1500 tonnes in 2000 and then relative stability at this level.
Kar zadeva Brazilijo kažejo povišanje od približno 460 ton v letu 1998 na več kot 1500 ton v letu 2000, potem pa relativno stabilnost na tej stopnji.
This shows a very significant increase and the stability of exports thereafter does not prove the non-existence of circumvention as these figures do not include indirect sales via other intermediary countries.
To kaže na bistven porast, zato kasnejša stabilnost izvoza ne dokazuje neobstoja izogibanja, saj te številke ne vključujejo posredne prodaje preko drugih držav posrednic.