natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
point 15a (Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3932/92) shall be deleted;
Besedilo točke 15a (Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 3932/92) se izbriše.
in points 2 adaptation (b), 4b adaptation (b), 5 adaptation (h), 6 adaptation (b), 7 adaptation (b), 15b adaptation (b), the words ‘Articles 6 and 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 17/62’ shall be replaced by the words ‘Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003’.
V točkah 2, prilagoditev (b), 4b, prilagoditev (b), 5, prilagoditev (h), 6, prilagoditev (b), 7, prilagoditev (b), 15b, prilagoditev (b), se besede „člena 6 in 8 Uredbe (EGS) št. 17/62“ nadomestijo z besedami „člen 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003“.
Furthermore, the words ‘, without any notification from the undertakings concerned being required’ shall be deleted from those adaptations.
Prav tako se besede „,ne da bi za to potreboval priglasitev udeleženih podjetij“ izbrišejo iz teh prilagoditev.
Article 3 of Protocol 21 to the Agreement shall be amended as follows:
Člen 3 Protokola 21 Sporazuma se dopolni z naslednjim:
the text of point 1(3) (Council Regulation (EEC) No17/62) shall be replaced by the following:
Besedilo točke 1(3) (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 17/62) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
‘32003 R 0001: Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1).’;
„32003 R 0001: Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe (UL L 1, 4.1.2003, str. 1)“.
the following shall be added in point 1(10) (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2988/74):
V točki 1(10) (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2988/74) se doda naslednje:
points 1(6) (Council Regulation (EEC) No 141/62), 1(7) (Article 6 and Articles 10 to 31 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1017/68) and 1(11) (Section II of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86) shall be deleted;
Besedilo točk 1(6) (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 141/62), 1(7) (člen 6 in členi od 10 do 31 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1017/68) in 1(11) (oddelek II Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4056/86) se izbriše.
the following indent shall be added in point 1(13) (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3975/87):
Točki 1(13) (Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 3975/87) se doda naslednja alinea:
Articles 4, 5, 6, 7 and 9 of Protocol 21 to the Agreement shall be deleted;
Besedilo členov 4, 5, 6, 7 in 9 Protokola 21 k Sporazumu se izbriše.
The words ‘and notifications’ shall be deleted in the first and second subparagraph of Article 8 of Protocol 21 to the Agreement;
Besedi „in priglasitvah“ se izbrišejo iz prvega pododstavka, besedi „in priglasitve“ pa se izbrišejo iz drugega pododstavka člena 8 Protokola 21 k Sporazumu.
the following shall be inserted after Article 13 of Protocol 21 to the Agreement:
Za člen 13 Protokola 21 se vstavi naslednje:
‘Review clause
„Klavzula o pregledu
By the end of 2005 and at the request of one of the Contracting Parties, the Parties shall review the mechanisms for the enforcement of Articles 53 and 54 of the Agreement as well as the cooperation mechanisms of Protocol 23 to the Agreement, with a view to ensuring the homogenous and effective application of those Articles.
Do konca leta 2005 in na željo ene od pogodbenic bodo pogodbenice pregledale mehanizme za izvajanje členov 53 in 54 Sporazuma ter mehanizme sodelovanja iz Protokola 23 k Sporazumu, zato da bi zagotovile homogeno in učinkovito izvajanje teh členov.
The Parties shall in particular review the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 130/2004 of 24 September 2004 in light of the Parties' experiences with the new system of enforcing the competition rules and explore the possibility of mirroring in the EEA the system established in the EU by Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 as regards the application of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty by national competition authorities, the horizontal cooperation between national competition authorities and the mechanism for ensuring uniform application of the competition rules by national authorities.’
Pogodbenice bodo pregledale predvsem Odločbo Skupnega odbora EGP št. 130/2004 z dne 24. septembra 2004 v zvezi z izkušnjami pogodbenic z novim sistemom izvajanja pravil o konkurenci in proučile možnost, da bi se v EGP zrcalil sistem, ki ga v EU uvaja Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 v zvezi z izvajanjem členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe s strani nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za konkurenco, s horizontalnim sodelovanjem med nacionalnimi organi, pristojnimi za konkurenco, in z mehanizmom za zagotavljanje enotnega izvajanja pravil konkurence s strani nacionalnih organov“.
Protocol 23 to the Agreement shall be replaced by the following:
Protokol 23 k Sporazumu se zamenja z naslednjim:
CONCERNING THE COOPERATION BETWEEN
O SODELOVANJU MED
THE SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITIES (ARTICLE 58)
NADZORNIMI ORGANI (ČLEN 58)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EC Commission shall exchange information and consult each other on general policy issues at the request of either of the surveillance authorities.
Nadzorni organ EFTA in Komisija ES izmenjujeta informacije in se medsebojno posvetujeta o splošnih političnih vprašanjih na prošnjo enega od obeh nadzornih organov.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EC Commission, in accordance with their internal rules, respecting Article 56 of the Agreement and Protocol 22 and the autonomy of both sides in their decisions, shall cooperate in the handling of individual cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3), as provided for in the provisions below.
Nadzorni organ EFTA in Komisija ES sodelujeta, v skladu z njunimi pravilniki in ob upoštevanju člena 56 Sporazuma in Protokola 22 ter neodvisnosti obeh strani pri odločanju, v zvezi z obravnavanjem posameznih primerov, ki sodijo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3), v skladu s spodnjimi določbami.
For the purposes of this Protocol, the term “territory of a surveillance authority” shall mean for the EC Commission the territory of the EC Member States to which the Treaty establishing the European Community applies, upon the terms laid down in that Treaty, and for the EFTA Surveillance Authority the territories of the EFTA States to which the Agreement applies.
Za namene tega protokola pomeni za Komisijo ES izraz ‚ozemlje nadzornega organa‘ ozemlje držav članic ES, za katero se uporablja Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti pod pogoji, opredeljenimi v tej pogodbi, za Nadzorni organ EFTA pa se ta izraz nanaša na ozemlja držav članic EFTA, za katere se uporablja Sporazum.
THE INITIAL PHASE OF THE PROCEEDINGS
ZAČETNA FAZA POSTOPKOV
In cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EC Commission shall without undue delay forward to each other complaints to the extent that it is not apparent that these have been addressed to both surveillance authorities.
Nadzorni organ EFTA in Komisija ES v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, brez neprimernega odlašanja drug drugemu posredujeta pritožbe, če iz njih ni razvidno, da so bile naslovljene na oba nadzorna organa.
They shall also inform each other when opening ex officio procedures.
Prav tako se obveščata o začetku postopkov po službeni dolžnosti.
The EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EC Commission shall without undue delay forward to each other information received from the national competition authorities within their respective territories concerning the commencement of the first formal investigative measure in cases falling under Article 56 (1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement.
Nadzorni organ EFTA in Komisija ES brez neprimernega odlašanja drug drugemu posredujeta informacije, ki jih prejmeta od nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za konkurenco na njunem ozemlju, in ki zadevajo začetek prvega formalnega preiskovalnega ukrepa za primere, ki sodijo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma.
The surveillance authority which has received information as provided for in the first paragraph may present its comments thereon within 30 working days of its receipt.
Nadzorni organ, ki je prejel informacije, predvidene v prvem odstavku, lahko v zvezi z njimi predloži v roku 30 delovnih dni po prejemu svoje pripombe.
The competent surveillance authority shall, in cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, consult the other surveillance authority when:
Pristojni nadzorni organ se v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, posvetuje z drugim nadzornim organom, če:
addressing to the undertakings or associations of undertakings concerned its statement of objections,
naslovi na zadevna podjetja ali podjetniška združenja svojo izjavo o ugovorih,
publishing its intention to adopt a decision declaring Article 53 or 54 of the Agreement not applicable, or
objavi svoj namen o sprejetju sklepa, s katerim izjavlja, da se člen 53 ali 54 Sporazuma ne uporablja, ali
publishing its intention to adopt a decision making commitments offered by the undertakings binding on the undertakings.
objavi svoj namen o sprejetju sklepa, s katerim postanejo obveznosti, ki jih ponujajo podjetja, zavezujoče za podjetja.
The other surveillance authority may deliver its comments within the time limits set out in the abovementioned publication or statement of objections.
Drugi nadzorni organ lahko predloži svoje stališče v rokih, določenih v zgoraj navedenih objavah ali izjavah o ugovorih.
Observations received from the undertakings concerned or third parties shall be transmitted to the other surveillance authority.
Stališča, prejeta od zadevnih podjetij ali tretjih strank, se posredujejo drugemu nadzornemu organu.
In cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, the competent surveillance authority shall transmit to the other surveillance authority the administrative letters by which a file is closed or a complaint rejected.
Pristojni nadzorni organ posreduje drugemu nadzornemu organu v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, administrativna pisma, s katerimi se akt zaključi ali pritožba zavrne.
In cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, the competent surveillance authority shall invite the other surveillance authority to be represented at hearings of the undertakings concerned.
Pristojni nadzorni organ povabi v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, drugi nadzorni organ, da se udeleži zaslišanj zadevnih podjetij.
The invitation shall also extend to the States falling within the competence of the other surveillance authority.
Vabilo se naslovi tudi na države, ki so v pristojnosti drugega nadzornega organa.
ADVISORY COMMITTEES
SVETOVALNI ODBORI
In cases falling under Article 56 (1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, the competent surveillance authority shall, in due time, inform the other surveillance authority of the date of the meeting of the Advisory Committee and transmit the relevant documentation.
Pristojni nadzorni organ pravočasno obvesti v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, drug nadzorni organ o datumu sestanka Svetovalnega odbora in posreduje ustrezno dokumentacijo.
All documents forwarded for that purpose from the other surveillance authority shall be presented to the Advisory Committee of the surveillance authority which is competent to decide on a case in accordance with Article 56 together with the material sent out by that surveillance authority.
Vsa dokumentacija, ki jo v ta namen posreduje drugi nadzorni organ, se predloži Svetovalnemu odboru nadzornega organa, pristojnemu za odločanje o primeru v skladu s členom 56, skupaj z dokumenti, ki jih pošlje ta nadzorni organ.
Each surveillance authority and the States falling within its competence shall be entitled to be present in the Advisory Committees of the other surveillance authority and to express their views therein; they shall not have, however, the right to vote.
Vsak nadzorni organ in države, ki spadajo v njegovo pristojnost, so upravičeni do prisotnosti v Svetovalnem odboru drugega nadzornega organa, v katerem lahko izrazijo tudi svoja stališča; vendar pa nimajo pravice glasovati.
Consultations may also take place by written procedure.
Posvetovanje se lahko opravi tudi s pisnim postopkom.
However, if the surveillance authority which is not competent to decide on a case in accordance with Article 56 so requests, the competent surveillance authority shall convene a meeting.
Vendar pa skliče pristojni nadzorni organ na zahtevo nadzornega organa, ki ni pristojen za odločanje o primeru v skladu s členom 56, sestanek.
The surveillance authority which is not competent to decide on a case in accordance with Article 56 of the Agreement may request from the other surveillance authority at all stages of the proceedings copies of the most important documents concerning cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2) second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, and may furthermore, before a final decision is taken, make any observations it considers appropriate.
V primerih iz člena 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma lahko nadzorni organ, ki ni pristojen za odločanje o primeru v skladu s členom 56, na vseh stopnjah postopka zaprosi za kopije najpomembnejših dokumentov, vloženih pri pristojnem nadzornem organu, prav tako pa lahko še pred sprejetjem dokončnega sklepa predloži vse pripombe, ki se mu zdijo primerne.
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE
UPRAVNA POMOČ
When the competent surveillance authority, as defined in Article 56 of the Agreement, by simple request or by decision requires an undertaking or association of undertakings located within the territory of the other surveillance authority to supply information, it shall at the same time forward a copy of the request or decision to the other surveillance authority.
Če zaprosi v členu 56 Sporazuma opredeljeni pristojni nadzorni organ z navadno zahtevo ali odločbo za informacije pri podjetju ali podjetniškemu združenju s sedežem na ozemlju drugega nadzornega organa, posreduje pristojni nadzorni organ hkrati kopijo zahteve ali odločbe drugemu nadzornemu organu.
At the request of the competent surveillance authority, as defined in Article 56 of the Agreement, the other surveillance authority shall, in accordance with its internal rules, undertake inspections within its territory in cases where the competent surveillance authority so requesting considers it to be necessary.
Drug nadzorni organ opravi v skladu s svojim pravilnikom, na prošnjo pristojnega nadzornega organa, opredeljenega v členu 56 Sporazuma, preiskave na svojem ozemlju, če pristojni nadzorni organ, ki to zahteva, meni, da so preiskave potrebne.
The competent surveillance authority is entitled to be represented and take an active part in inspections carried out by the other surveillance authority in respect of paragraph 2.
Pristojni nadzorni organ je upravičen do zastopanja in dejavnega sodelovanja pri preiskavah, ki jih v skladu z odstavkom 2 izvaja drug nadzorni organ.
All information obtained during such inspections on request shall be transmitted to the surveillance authority which requested the inspections immediately after their finalization.
Vse informacije, ki so bile pridobljene med preiskavami, opravljenimi na prošnjo, se pošljejo nadzornemu organu, ki je zaprosil za preglede, takoj po njihovem zaključku.
Where the competent surveillance authority, in cases falling under Article 56(1)(b) and (c), (2), second sentence and (3) of the Agreement, carries out inspections within its territory, it shall inform the other surveillance authority of the fact that such inspections have taken place and, on request, transmit to that authority the relevant results of the inspections.
Če opravi pristojni nadzorni organ v primerih, ki spadajo pod člen 56(1)(b) in (c), (2) drugi stavek in (3) Sporazuma, preiskave na svojem ozemlju, obvesti drug nadzorni organ o dejstvu, da so bile takšne preiskave opravljene, in posreduje temu organu na prošnjo ustrezne rezultate teh preiskav.
When the competent surveillance authority as defined in Article 56 of the Agreement interviews a consenting natural or legal person in the territory of the other surveillance authority, the latter shall be informed thereof.
Če opravi pristojni nadzorni organ, opredeljen v členu 56 Sporazuma, pogovor s fizično ali pravno osebo, ki privoli v pogovor, na ozemlju drugega nadzornega organa, obvesti o tem drug nadzorni organ.
The surveillance authority which is not competent may be present during such an interview, as well as officials from the competition authority on whose territory the interviews are conducted.
Pri takšnem pogovoru je lahko prisoten nadzorni organ, ki ni pristojen, in tudi uradniki organa, pristojnega za konkurenco, na ozemlju katerega se opravljajo pogovori.
For the purpose of applying Articles 53 and 54 of the Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the EC Commission shall have the power to provide one another with and use in evidence any matter of fact or of law, including confidential information.
Nadzorni organ EFTA in Komisija ES sta v namen izvajanja členov 53 in 54 Sporazuma pooblaščena, da si medsebojno priskrbita katero koli pravno ali dejansko vprašanje, vključno z zaupnimi podatki, in ga vključita med dokaze.
Information acquired or exchanged pursuant to this Protocol shall only be used in evidence for the purpose of procedures under Articles 53 and 54 of the Agreement and in respect of the subject matter for which it was collected.
Informacije, pridobljene ali izmenjane v skladu s tem protokolom, se uporabljajo le v namene postopkov iz členov 53 in 54 Sporazuma in v zvezi z vsebino, za katero so bile zbrane.
Where the information referred to in Article 2 (1) and (2) concerns a case which has been initiated as a result of an application for leniency, that information cannot be used by the receiving surveillance authority as the basis for starting an inspection on its own behalf.
Če informacije, na katere se nanaša člen 2(1) in (2), zadevajo primer, sprožen kot posledica prošnje za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni, nadzorni organ teh informacij, ki jih je sprejel, ne more uporabiti kot izhodišče za preiskave v svojem imenu.
This is without prejudice to any power of the surveillance authority to open an inspection on the basis of information received from other sources.
To ne posega v pooblastilo nadzornega organa, da začne preiskavo na podlagi informacij, prejetih iz drugih virov.
Save as provided under paragraph 5, information voluntarily submitted by a leniency applicant will only be transmitted to the other surveillance authority with the consent of the applicant.
Razen kakor je predvideno v odstavku 5, se bodo informacije, ki jih je prostovoljno predložil prosilec za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni, posredovale drugemu nadzornemu organu s privolitvijo prosilca.
Similarly other information that has been obtained during or following an inspection or by means of or following any other fact-finding measures which, in each case, could not have been carried out except as a result of the leniency application will only be transmitted to the other surveillance authority if the applicant has consented to the transmission to that authority of information it has voluntarily submitted in its application for leniency.
Druge informacije, pridobljene med preiskavo ali po njej ali z drugimi ukrepi ali po katerih koli drugih raziskovalnih ukrepih, ki so se v vsakem primeru izvajali zgolj kot posledica prošnje za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni, se bodo prav tako posredovale drugemu nadzornemu organu, če je prosilec privolil v posredovanje informacij, ki jih je prostovoljno predložil v prošnji temu organu.
Once the leniency applicant has given consent to the transmission of information to the other surveillance authority, that consent may not be withdrawn.
Potem ko je prosilec za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni privolil v posredovanje informacij drugemu nadzornemu organu, te privolitve ni več mogoče umakniti.
This paragraph is without prejudice, however, to the responsibility of each applicant to file leniency applications to whichever authorities it may consider appropriate.
Vendar pa ta odstavek ne posega v odgovornost vsakega prosilca, da vloži prošnjo za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni pri katerem koli organu, za katerega meni, da je primeren.
Notwithstanding paragraph 4, the consent of the applicant for the transmission of information to the other surveillance authority is not required in any of the following circumstances:
Privolitev prosilca v posredovanje informacij drugemu nadzornemu organu ni potrebna, ne glede na odstavek 4, v kateri koli od naslednjih okoliščin:
no consent is required where the receiving surveillance authority has also received a leniency application relating to the same infringement from the same applicant as the transmitting surveillance authority, provided that at the time the information is transmitted it is not open to the applicant to withdraw the information which it has submitted to that receiving surveillance authority;
privolitev ni potrebna, če je nadzorni organ, ki prejema prošnjo, prejel prošnjo za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni, ki zadeva isto kršitev in ki jo je poslal isti prosilec, kot jo je poslal nadzornemu organu, ki prošnjo posreduje, če prosilec med posredovanjem informacije ne more umakniti informacije, ki jo je predložil nadzornemu organu, ki je prošnjo prejel;
no consent is required where the receiving surveillance authority has provided a written commitment that neither the information transmitted to it nor any other information it may obtain following the date and time of transmission as noted by the transmitting surveillance authority, will be used by it or by any other authority to which the information is subsequently transmitted to impose sanctions on the leniency applicant or on any other legal or natural person covered by the favourable treatment offered by the transmitting authority as a result of the application made by the applicant under its leniency programme or on any employee or former employee of the leniency applicant or of any of the aforementioned persons.
privolitev ni potrebna, če se je nadzorni organ, ki prejema prošnjo, pisno obvezal, da informacij, ki so mu bile posredovane, in informacij, ki jih je prejel po datumu in času posredovanja, ki ju je zabeležil nadzorni organ, ki pošilja prošnjo, niti sam niti kateri koli drug organ, ki bi se mu lahko posredovale informacije, ne bo uporabljal za nalaganje kazni prosilcu za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni ali kateri koli drugi pravni ali fizični osebi, ki je deležna ugodnejše obravnave s strani nadzornega organa, ki posreduje prošnjo, na podlagi prošnje, ki jo vloži prosilec v programu imunitete pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanja denarne kazni ali kateremu koli trenutnemu ali nekdanjemu zaposlenemu prosilca ali katere koli prej omenjene osebe.
A copy of the receiving authority's written commitment will be provided to the applicant;
Prosilcu se zagotovi kopija pisne obveze organa, ki prejme prošnjo.
in the case of information collected by a surveillance authority under Article 8(2) at the request of the surveillance authority to whom the leniency application was made, no consent is required for the transmission of such information to, and its use by, the surveillance authority to whom the application was made.
kar zadeva informacije, ki jih zbere nadzorni organ v skladu s členom 8(2) na zahtevo nadzornega organa, na katerega je naslovljena prošnja za imuniteto pred denarno kaznijo ali zmanjšanje denarne kazni, ni potrebna privolitev v posredovanje teh informacij nadzornemu organu, na katerega je naslovljena prošnja, in njihovo uporabo s strani tega nadzornega organa.
PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
POKLICNA TAJNOST