natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(Columns 7 to 10) Unused.’
(stolpci 7 do 10). Nerazporejeno.“
When applicable, these codes can be used also for CNDPs in Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia.
Kjer je potrebno, se te šifre uporabijo tudi za CNDP v Češki, Estoniji, na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi, Madžarski, Poljski in Sloveniji.
Area payments for flax grown for fibre
Plačila na površino za lan, gojen za vlakna
Area payments for hemp grown for fibre
Plačila na površino za konopljo, gojeno za vlakna
Land set aside to comply with Council Regulations (EC) No 1251/1999 and (EC) No 1782/2003, and not cultivated, is also to be entered. Includes also set-aside with green cover.
V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1251/1999 in Uredbo (ES) št. 1782/2003 je prav tako treba vpisati zemljišče v prahi, ki ni obdelano, vključno z zemljiščem v prahi s travno rušo.
Registered (= normal)
Registriran (= normalni)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2254/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2254/2004
amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2092/91 o ekološki pridelavi kmetijskih proizvodov in označevanju tovrstno pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 of 24 June 1991 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs [1], and in particular the second indent of Article 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2092/91 z dne 24. junija 1991 o ekološki pridelavi kmetijskih proizvodov in označevanju tovrstno pridelanih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil [1] in zlasti druge alinee člena 13 Uredbe,
Harmonised rules for organic livestock production are still quite recent and with the current development of this sector there is still not a sufficient range of biodiversity of organically reared livestock available on the market.
Predpisi o ekološki reji živali so bili usklajeni šele nedavno in glede na sedanji razvoj tega sektorja je biotska raznovrstnost ekološko rejenih živali na trgu še vedno nezadostna.
Hence, there is still a need to facilitate the development of the organic livestock production.
Zato še vedno obstaja potreba po spodbujanju razvoja ekološke reje živali.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2277/2003 [2], which amended Annexes I and II to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91, extended the transitional period for bringing conventional animals into the organic farming system until 31 December 2004.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2277/2003 [2], ki spreminja Prilogi I in II k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2092/91, je prehodno obdobje za vključitev živali iz konvencionalne reje v sistem ekološke pridelave podaljšala do 31. decembra 2004.
However, this extension has proved not to be sufficient in particular in the case of poultry production, which comprises different stages where different specialised sectors are involved.
To podaljšanje se je izkazalo za nezadostno, predvsem pri proizvodnji perutnine, ki vključuje različne faze, v katerih sodelujejo različni specializirani sektorji.
There is, therefore, still a need for reliance on non-organically reared animals.
Zato še vedno ostaja potreba po neekološko rejenih živalih.
The provisions on the origin of the animals should be adapted accordingly.
Določbe o poreklu živali je treba ustrezno prilagoditi.
Although it is already possible to reinforce the provisions on the origin of pullets for egg production, production standards for these animals have not been harmonised yet.
Čeprav je okrepitev določb o poreklu kokoši nesnic že možna, proizvodni standardi za te živali še niso usklajeni.
Until such standards are established, it is appropriate to permit bringing non-organically reared pullets for egg production of not more than 18 weeks into an organic livestock unit when organically reared pullets are not available, under certain conditions applying prior to bringing these animals into the organic farming system.
Dokler ti standardi ne bodo določeni, se v primeru, da ekološko rejenih kokoši ni na voljo, dovoli vključitev manj kot 18 tednov starih neekološko rejenih kokoši nesnic v ekološko proizvodno enoto, pod določenimi pogoji, ki se uporabijo pred vključitvijo teh živali v sistem ekološke pridelave.
Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Prilogo I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2092/91 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Considering the urgency of the measure due to the fact that certain provisions on the origin of animals expire on 31 December 2004, this Regulation should enter into force on the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Glede na nujnost ukrepa zaradi prenehanja veljavnosti nekaterih določb o izvoru živali 31. decembra 2004 ta uredba začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set up by Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to uredbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora, ustanovljenega na podlagi člena 14 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2092/91.
Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Priloga I k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2092/91 se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1481/2004 (OJ L 272, 20.8.2004, p.11).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1481/2004 (UL L 272, 20.8.2004, str. 11).
Annex I(B) to Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91 is amended as follows:
Priloga I, Del B k Uredbi (EGS) št. 2092/91 se spremeni:
The first and second indents of point 3.4. are replaced by the following:
Prva in druga alinea točke 3.4 se nadomestita z naslednjo:
pullets for the production of eggs and poultry for meat production must be less than three days old.’
kokoši nesnice in perutnina za prirejo mesa morajo biti stare manj kot tri dni“.
The text of point 3.5. is replaced by the following:
Besedilo točke 3.5 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
This derogation must be authorised beforehand by the inspection authority or body.’
To odstopanje mora predhodno odobriti inšpekcijski organ.“.
The text of point 3.6. is replaced by the following:
Besedilo točke 3.6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
By way of a third derogation, the renewal or reconstitution of the herd or flock shall be authorised by the control authority or body when organically reared animals are not available, and in the following cases:
Na podlagi tretjega odstopanja obnovitev ali ponovno oblikovanje črede ali jate odobri nadzorni organ, če ekološko vzrejenih živali ni na voljo in v primeru:
high mortality of animals caused by health or catastrophic circumstances;
visoke smrtnosti živali iz zdravstvenih razlogov ali zaradi elementarnih nesreč;
pullets for egg production and poultry for meat production less than three days old.
manj kot tri dni starih kokoši nesnic in perutnine za prirejo mesa;
piglets for breeding purposes, which must be reared according to the rules of this regulation as soon as they are weaned and must weigh less than 35 kg.
plemenskih pujskov, ki jih je treba rediti v skladu s pravili te uredbe takoj po odstavitvi, tehtati pa morajo manj kot 35 kg.
Case (c) is authorised for a transitional period expiring on 31 July 2006.’
Primer iz točke (c) se odobri za prehodno obdobje, ki se izteče 31. julija 2006.“.
The text of point 3.7. is replaced by the following:
Besedilo točke 3.7 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Notwithstanding the provisions laid down in points 3.4. and 3.6., non-organically reared pullets for egg production of not more than 18 weeks may be brought into an organic livestock unit when organically reared pullets are not available, subject to following conditions:
Ne glede na določbe iz točk 3.4 in 3.6, se lahko v primeru, da ekološko rejenih kokoši ni na voljo, v ekološko proizvodno enoto vključi manj kot 18 tednov stare neekološko rejene kokoši nesnice pod naslednjimi pogoji:
prior authorisation of the competent authority, and
predhodna odobritev pristojnega organa, in
from 31 December 2005, the provisions laid down in paragraphs 4 (Feed) and 5 (Disease prevention and veterinary treatment) of this Annex I shall apply to non-organically reared pullets intended to be brought into organic livestock units.’
od 31. decembra 2005 se določbe iz odstavka 4 (Krma) in 5 (Preprečevanje bolezni in veterinarsko zdravljenje) te Priloge I uporablja za neekološko rejene kokoši, namenjene vključitvi v ekološke proizvodne enote.“.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2255/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2255/2004
on proof of completion of customs formalities for the import of sugar into third countries as provided for in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999
o dokazilu zaključka carinskih formalnosti za uvoz sladkorja v tretje države, kakor je določeno v členu 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector [1], and in particular the second sentence of the second indent of the first subparagraph of Article 27(11) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/2001 z dne 19. junija 2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor [1], in zlasti drugega stavka druge alinee prvega pododstavka člena 27(11) Uredbe,
Article 27(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 provides that export refunds in the sugar sector may vary according to destination, where the world market situation or the specific requirements of certain markets make this necessary.
Člen 27(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 določa, da se izvozna nadomestila za proizvode v sektorju sladkorja lahko razlikujejo glede na destinacijo, če to zahteva položaj na svetovnem trgu ali posebne zahteve nekaterih trgov.
Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1327/2004 of 19 July 2004 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2004/05 marketing year [2] provides for such differentiation by excluding certain destinations.
Člen 1 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1327/2004 z dne 19. julija 2004 o stalnem javnem razpisu v okviru tržnega leta 2004/2005 za določitev prelevmanov in/ali povračil pri izvozu belega sladkorja [2], omogoča takšno razlikovanje z izključitvijo nekaterih destinacij.
Moreover, the bi-monthly or monthly setting, as the case may be, of export refunds for white sugar, raw sugar without further processing, syrups and other sugar sector products as provided for in Articles 28 and 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 excludes certain destinations.
Poleg tega določanje dvakrat ali enkrat na mesec, odvisno od primera, izvoznih nadomestil za proizvode iz belega sladkorja, surovega sladkorja brez nadaljnje predelave, sirupov in nekaterih drugih proizvodov v sektorju sladkorja, kakor je določeno v členih 28 in 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001, izključuje nekatere destinacije.
The first subparagraph of Article 27(11) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 provides that the refund is to be paid upon proof that the products have been exported from the Community and, in the case of a differentiated refund, the products have reached the destination indicated on the licence or another destination for which a refund has been fixed.
Prvi pododstavek člena 27(11) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001 določa odobritev nadomestila v primeru predložitve dokazila, da so pri diferenciranem nadomestilu proizvodi, izvoženi iz Skupnosti, dosegli destinacijo, navedeno v dovoljenju, ali drugo destinacijo, za katero je bilo določeno nadomestilo.
Article 16 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 of 15 April 1999 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products [3] lists the various documents that may constitute proof of the completion of customs formalities in a third country where the refund rate is differentiated according to destination.
Člen 16 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 800/1999 z dne 15. aprila 1999 o skupnih podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode [3] navaja različne dokumente, ki so lahko dokazilo o opravljenih uvoznih carinskih formalnostih v tretji državi, v kateri je stopnja nadomestila diferencirana skladno z destinacijo.
Under that Article the Commission may decide, in certain specific cases to be determined, that the proof referred to in that Article may be deemed to be furnished by a specific document or in any other way.
V skladu s to določbo se Komisija v nekaterih posebnih primerih, ki se določijo, lahko odloči, da se lahko dokazilo iz navedenega člena šteje za predloženo s posebnim dokumentom ali na kateri koli drug način.
In the sugar sector, export operations are normally governed by contracts defined as fob on the London futures market.
V sektorju sladkorja izvozne operacije navadno urejajo pogodbe, ki so opredeljene kot FOB na terminskem londonskem trgu.
As a result, purchasers accept at that fob stage all the contractual obligations, including proof of completion of customs formalities, without being the direct beneficiaries of the refund to which that proof confers the right.
Zato kupci na navedeni ravni FOB sprejemajo vse pogodbene obveznosti, vključno z dokazilom o opravljenih carinskih formalnostih, ne da bi bili neposredni upravičenci do nadomestila, do katerega jim daje pravico to dokazilo.
Obtaining that proof for all quantities exported may entail considerable administrative difficulties in certain countries, which may substantially delay or prevent payment of the refund for all the quantities actually exported.
Pridobitev tega dokazila za vse izvožene količine lahko povzroči precejšnje upravne težave v nekaterih državah, to pa lahko občutno odloži ali prepreči plačilo nadomestila za vse dejansko izvožene količine.
In order to limit the impact on the equilibrium of the sugar market, Commission Regulation (EC) No 40/2004 of 9 January 2004 on proof of completion of customs formalities for the import of sugar into third countries, as provided for in Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 [4], defined the alternative proofs offering guarantees enabling the product to be deemed to have been imported into a third country.
Da bi zmanjšali negativni vpliv na ravnovesje trga za sladkor, Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 40/2004 z dne 9. januarja 2004 o dokazilu zaključka carinskih formalnosti za uvoz sladkorja v tretje države, kakor je določeno v členu 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 [4], določa nadomestna dokazila o potrebnih jamstvih, na podlagi katerih proizvod velja kot uvožen v tretje države.
Since the administrative difficulties and their impact on the market still persist at the approach of the deadline of 31 December 2004, when Regulation (EC) No 40/2004 ceases to apply, the alternative proofs of destination should be defined again for exports effected as from 1 January 2005.
Glede na približevanje datumu, s katerim Uredba (ES) št. 40/2004 preneha veljati, to je 31. december 2004, je bilo ugotovljeno, da upravne težave in njihov vpliv na trg še niso odpravljene, zato je treba ponovno določiti nadomestna dokazila o destinacijah za izvoz po 1. januarju 2005.
This being a derogation, its period of application should be restricted.
Ker je to odstopanje, je treba omejiti obdobje uporabe.
In the case of exports effected in accordance with Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 for which the exporter is unable to provide the proof referred to in Article 16(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, products shall, by derogation from that Article, be deemed to have been imported into a third country on presentation of the following three documents:
Pri izvozih, opravljenih v skladu s členom 27 Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/2001, za katere izvoznik ni zmožen zagotoviti dokazila iz člena 16(1) in (2) Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999, se proizvodi z odstopanjem od navedenega člena 16 štejejo za uvožene v tretjo državo ob predložitvi naslednjih treh dokumentov:
a copy of the transport document;
izvoda prevozne listine;
a declaration that the product has been unloaded, drawn up by an official authority of the third country in question, by the official authorities of a Member State established in the country of destination, or by an international supervisory agency approved under Articles 16a to 16f of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, certifying that the product has left the unloading site or at least that, to the knowledge of the authority or agency issuing the declaration, the product has not subsequently been reloaded with a view to being re-exported;
deklaracije, da je bil proizvod raztovorjen, ki jo sestavi uradni organ zadevne tretje države ali uradni organi države članice s sedežem v namembni državi ali mednarodna nadzorna služba, odobrena v skladu s členi 16a do 16f Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999, ki potrjuje, da je proizvod zapustil mesto raztovarjanja ali da vsaj po vedenju organov ali služb, ki izdajajo deklaracijo, proizvod pozneje ni bil znova naložen zaradi ponovnega izvoza;
a bank document issued by approved intermediaries established in the Community certifying that payment corresponding to the export in question has been credited to the account of the exporter opened with them, or proof of payment.
bančnega dokumenta, ki so ga izdali potrjeni posredniki s sedežem v Skupnosti, ki potrjuje, da je bilo plačilo, ki ustreza zadevnemu izvozu, nakazano na račun izvoznika, ki je odprt pri njih, ali dokazila o plačilu.
For the purposes of applying Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, Member States shall take account of paragraph 1 of this Article.
Države članice za uporabo člena 20 Uredbe (ES) št. 800/1999 upoštevajo določbe iz odstavka 1 tega člena.
It shall apply up to 31 December 2005.
Uporablja se do 31. decembra 2005.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1685/2004 (OJ L 303, 30.9.2004, p. 21).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1685/2004 (UL L 303, 30.9.2004, str. 21).
OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 17.
UL L 6, 10.1.2004, str. 17.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 778/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 62).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 778/2004 (UL L 123, 27.4.2004, str. 62).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2256/2004
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 2256/2004
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 as regards Community tariff quotas for certain products originating in Egypt, in Malta and in Cyprus and as regards reference quantities for certain products originating in Malta and in Cyprus
o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 747/2001 v zvezi s tarifnimi kvotami Skupnosti za nekatere proizvode s poreklom iz Egipta, Malte in Cipra in v zvezi z referenčnimi količinami za nekatere proizvode s poreklom iz Malte in Cipra
Having regard to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded [1], and in particular Article 57(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pogojih pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija [1], in zlasti člena 57(2) Akta,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 of 9 April 2001 providing for the management of Community tariff quotas and of reference quantities for products eligible for preferences by virtue of agreements with certain Mediterranean countries and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1981/94 and (EC) No 934/95 [2], and in particular Article 5(1)(b) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 747/2001 z dne 9. aprila 2001 o zagotovitvi upravljanja tarifnih kvot Skupnosti in referenčnih količin za izdelke, ki so na podlagi sporazumov z nekaterimi sredozemskimi državami upravičeni do preferencialov, ter o razveljavitvi uredb (ES) št. 1981/94 in (ES) št. 934/95 [2], in zlasti člena 5(1)(b) Uredbe,
By its Decision 2004/664/EC [3] of 24 September 2004, the Council has given authorisation for the signature and has provided for the provisional application from 1 May 2004 of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union.
Svet je s svojim sklepom 2004/664/ES z dne 24. septembra 2004 [3] odobril podpis in od 1. maja 2004 predpisal začasno uporabo Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Arabsko republiko Egiptom na drugi, o upoštevanju pristopa Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike k Evropski uniji.
This Protocol provides for a new tariff quota and for changes to the existing tariff quotas laid down in Regulation (EC) No 747/2001.
Ta protokol določa novo tarifno kvoto in spremembe obstoječih tarifnih kvot, ki so določene v Uredbi (ES) št. 747/2001.
To implement the new tariff quota and the changes to the existing tariff quotas, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EC) No 747/2001.
Za izvajanje nove tarifne kvote in spremembo obstoječih tarifnih kvot je treba spremeniti Uredbo (ES) št. 747/2001.
For the year 2004 the volumes of the new tariff quota and the increases of the volumes of existing tariff quotas should be calculated as a pro rata of the basic volumes specified in the Protocol, taking into account the part of the period elapsed before 1 May 2004.
Za leto 2004 je treba količine nove tarifne kvote in povečanje količin obstoječih tarifnih kvot izračunati sorazmerno z osnovnimi količinami, ki so opredeljene v Protokolu in z upoštevanjem dela obdobja, ki je poteklo pred 1. majem 2004.
In order to facilitate the management of certain existing tariff quotas provided for in Regulation (EC) No 747/2001, the quantities imported within the framework of those quotas should be taken into account for charging on the tariff quotas opened in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 747/2001, as amended by this Regulation.
Za lažje upravljanje nekaterih obstoječih tarifnih kvot, določenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 747/2001, je treba pri zaračunavanju tarifnih kvot, odprtih v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 747/2001, kakor je spremenjena s to uredbo, upoštevati količine, uvožene v okviru teh kvot.
After the accession of Malta and Cyprus to the European Union, the tariff quotas and reference quantities for products originating in those Member States as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 should lapse.
Po pristopu Malte in Cipra k Evropski uniji, se mora v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 747/2001 tarifnim kvotam in referenčnim količinam za proizvode s poreklom iz teh dveh držav članic izteči veljavnost.
The references to those quotas and reference quantities should therefore be deleted.
Sklice na te kvote in referenčne količine je zato treba črtati.
Since the Protocol to the EU-Egypt Euro-Mediterranean Agreement applies on a provisional basis from 1 May 2004, this Regulation should apply from the same date and should enter into force as soon as possible.
Ker se Protokol k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu med EU in Egiptom začasno uporablja od 1. maja 2004, se ta uredba uporablja od istega datuma in začne veljati čimprej.
Regulation (EC) No 747/2001 is amended as follows:
Uredba (ES) št. 747/2001 se spremeni, kot sledi:
Tariff concessions within Community tariff quotas or within reference quantities
Tarifne koncesije znotraj tarifnih kvot Skupnosti ali znotraj referenčnih količin