natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Allowances for differences in transport costs, freight and insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, import charges and indirect taxes, credit costs, after-sales costs, commissions, discounts and rebates were granted where applicable and justified.
Kjer je bilo ustrezno in podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bila odobrena nadomestila za razlike v stroških transporta, zavarovanja, skladiščenja, natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, v uvoznih dajatvah ter posrednih davkih, stroških posojil, poprodajnih stroških, provizijah, popustih in rabatih.
JSC ‘Mogilevkhimvolokno’ claimed that, if its products, in spite of the arguments mentioned in recital 14 above, were to be considered like products, an adjustment would be appropriate due to the alleged differences in quality and uses.
Podjetje JSC „Mogilevkhimvolokno“ je trdilo, da tudi če bi njegove izdelke, kljub argumentom, omenjenim v uvodni izjavi (14) zgoraj, šteli za podobne izdelke, bi bilo treba opraviti prilagoditev glede na domnevne razlike v kakovosti in uporabnostjo.
As this claim was not substantiated, it had to be rejected.
Ker ta zahteva ni bila utemeljena, jo je bilo treba zavreči.
As provided by Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, the adjusted weighted average normal value established for each product type in the analogue country was compared with the adjusted weighted average export prices of each corresponding product type of the product concerned originating in Belarus.
Kot je določeno s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe, je bila prilagojena tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost, določena za vsako vrsto izdelka v analogni državi, primerjana z prilagojenimi tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami vsake ustrezne vrste izdelka zadevnega izdelka s poreklom iz Belorusije.
On the basis of this comparison, a zero dumping margin was found in respect of exports from Belarus to the Community.
Na osnovi te primerjave je bila za izvoz iz Belorusije v Skupnost določena nična stopnja dampinga.
The co-operating exporter in Belarus accounted for the totality of the production and the exports of the product concerned from Belarus.
Sodelujoči izvoznik iz Belorusije je predstavljal celoto proizvodnje in izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije.
Therefore, the country wide dumping margin was also found to be zero.
Zato je bila tudi stopnja dampinga na ravni države enaka nič.
In view of the countrywide zero dumping margin, it has been concluded that the investigation should be terminated without the adoption of measures with regard to imports originating in Belarus, in accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na nično stopnjo dampinga na ravni države, je bilo sklenjeno, da je treba v skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe prekiniti preiskavo brez sprejetja ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Belorusije.
For certain product types sold for export to the Community by all three investigated companies, domestic sales were found to have been made in representative quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.
Za nekatere vrste izdelkov, katere vsa tri preiskana podjetja izvažajo v Skupnost, je bilo za ugotovljeno, da se izdelujejo v reprezentativnih količinah in v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
Normal value for these product types was based on the actual prices paid or payable, by independent customers in the domestic market of Korea, during the investigation period, in accordance with Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost za te tipe izdelkov je bila osnovana na cenah, ki so jih neodvisni kupci na korejskem notranjem trgu, v času preiskave, v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe, dejansko plačali ali bi jih morali plačati.
All three investigated companies sold certain such product types for export to the Community.
Obe preiskovani podjetji sta omejene količine nekaterih takšnih vrst izdelkov izvažali v Skupnost.
All export sales of one exporting producer and part of those of another exporting producer were made directly to related importers in the Community.
Ves izvoz enega proizvajalca izvoznika in del izvoza drugega proizvajalca izvoznika sta bila opravljena neposredno povezanim uvoznikom v Skupnosti.
Consequently, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the prices at which the products were first resold to an independent buyer and in accordance with the methodology described in recital 24.
Tako je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe na osnovi cen, po katerih so bili izdelki prvič nadalje prodani neodvisnemu kupcu in v skladu z metodologijo, opisano v uvodni izjavi 24.
The remaining exports of the product concerned by two exporting producers were made directly to independent customers in the Community.
Preostali izvoz zadevnega izdelka dveh proizvajalcev izvoznikov je bil opravljen neposredno neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti.
For those sales, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of prices actually paid or payable.
Pri tem je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na osnovi cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali plačljive.
For all investigated exporting producers, allowances for differences in transport costs, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, indirect taxes, credit costs, after-sales costs, commissions, discounts and rebates were granted where applicable and justified.
Kjer je bilo ustrezno in podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bila za vse preiskovane proizvajalce izvoznike odobrena nadomestila za razlike v stroških transporta, čezoceanskem tovoru, stroških zavarovanja, skladiščenja, natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, posrednih davkih, stroških posojil, poprodajnih stroških, provizijah, popustih in rabatih.
One exporting producer requested an adjustment for a quantity discount in its related importer’s resale price to the first independent customer claiming that its resale prices to some customers who had quarterly contracts were lower than the prices of those customers who were purchasing on a spot basis.
En proizvajalec izvoznik je zahteval prilagoditev za količinski popust pri ceni pri nadaljnji prodaji njegovega povezanega uvoznika prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu, ki je zatrjeval, da so njegove cene pri nadaljnji prodaji za nekatere kupce, ki so sklenili četrtletne pogodbe, nižje od cen za tiste kupce, ki so kupovali na kraju samem.
Furthermore, it claimed that such contracts are not made with domestic customers and, therefore, an adjustment should be made in the export price to enable fair comparison of the export price and the normal value.
Trdil je tudi, da takšnih pogodb ni sklepal z domačimi kupci ter da je zato treba opraviti prilagoditev izvozne cene, da bi bila zagotovljena poštena primerjava izvozne cene in normalne vrednosti.
The Commission investigated the appropriateness of the claimed adjustment.
Komisija je preiskala primernost zahtevane prilagoditve.
The investigation showed that some customers in the Community indeed had quarterly contracts with the related importer.
Preiskava je pokazala, da so nekateri kupci v Skupnosti res sklenili četrtletne pogodbe s povezanim uvoznikom.
Since it was found that domestic customers did not have such contracts, it was further investigated whether the normal value and the export price were on a comparable basis.
Ker je bilo ugotovljeno, da domači kupci takšnih pogodb niso sklenili, je bilo naknadno raziskano, ali sta normalna vrednost in izvozna cena primerljivi.
It could not be established that the prices for the customers in the Community included the claimed discount.
Ugotovitve niso potrdile, da cene za kupce v Skupnosti vključujejo tudi zahtevani popust.
Furthermore, the claimed discount was not shown as a discount on the invoices, no Credit Notes were issued concerning the discount nor was the alleged discount entered neither into the accounting of the producer nor in that of the related importer.
Prav tako zahtevani popust na računih ni bil prikazan kot popust, v skladu s popustom ni bil izdan dobropis, domnevni popust pa tudi ni bil vnesen v računovodske knjige proizvajalca ali povezanega uvoznika.
It should be noted that quantity discounts can only be considered for an adjustment when they are actually given for differences in quantities directly linked to the sales under consideration.
Omeniti je treba, da je količinske popuste kot prilagoditev mogoče upoštevati le, kadar so dejansko izdani za razlike v količinah, ki so neposredno povezane z zadevno prodajo.
In this case, however, it could not be established that such discounts were given by the company concerned.
V navedenem primeru pa ni bilo mogoče zaključiti, da je zadevno podjetje takšne popuste tudi dejansko izdalo.
Consequently, and in view of the fact that the normal value and the export price were found to be on a comparable basis, the claimed adjustment concerning the quantity discount was rejected.
Posledično in glede na ugotovitev, da sta bili normalna vrednost in izvozna cena primerljivi, je bila zahtevana prilagoditev za količinski popust zavrnjena.
All three investigated companies claimed a duty drawback adjustment pursuant to Article 2(10)(b) of the basic Regulation on the grounds that import charges were allegedly borne by the like product when intended for consumption in the exporting country but were refunded or not paid when the product was sold for export to the Community.
Vsa tri preiskovana podjetja so zahtevala prilagoditev za povračilo dajatev v skladu s členom 2(10)(b) osnovne uredbe z utemeljitvijo, da so bile uvozne dajatve domnevno zaračunane za podoben izdelek, namenjen za potrošnjo v državi izvoznici, a so bile kasneje, ko je bil izdelek izvožen v Skupnost, povrnjene ali neizplačane.
This claim was considered unfounded because all three companies failed to show that import charges refunded to the companies were due to the exports of the product concerned exported to the Community.
Ta trditev je bila spoznana za neutemeljeno, saj nobenemu od treh podjetij ni uspelo prikazati, da je bilo povračilo uvoznih dajatev podjetjem posledica izvoza zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost.
One company claimed an adjustment pursuant to Article 2(10)(f) of the basic Regulation for differences in the directly related packing costs between the exported and the domestically sold products.
Eno podjetje je zahtevalo prilagoditev v skladu s členom 2(10)(f) osnovne uredbe za razlike pri neposredno povezanih stroških pakiranja med izdelki, namenjenimi za izvoz in prodajo na notranjem trgu.
In this respect, the company failed to demonstrate any cost difference affecting price comparability, between the packing of the product concerned and that of the like product sold by the co-operating Korean exporters on their domestic market.
V tem primeru podjetju ni uspelo prikazati razlike v ceni, ki bi vplivala na primerljivost med ceno pakiranja zadevnega izdelka in ceno pakiranja podobnega izdelka, ki ga korejski izvozniki prodajajo na notranjem trgu.
Thus, this claim was rejected.
Tako je bila ta zahteva zavrnjena.
As provided by Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, for each company the adjusted weighted average normal value established for each product type was compared with the adjusted weighted average export prices of each corresponding product type.
Kot je določeno s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe, je bila za vsako podjetje prilagojena tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost, določena za vsako vrsto izdelka, primerjana s prilagojenimi tehtanimi povprečnimi izvoznimi cenami za vsako ustrezno vrsto izdelka.
On this basis, the dumping margins, expressed as a percentage of the cif import price at the Community border, duty unpaid, are the following:
Na tej osnovi so stopnje dampinga, izražene v odstotku uvozne cene CIF na meji Skupnosti, neocarinjene, naslednje:
With regard to imports originating in Korea, it should be noted that the three exporting producers above represent the entirety of exports originating in this country when compared to the Eurostat data.
V zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Koreje je treba opozoriti, da ob primerjavi s podatki Statističnega urada Evropskih skupnosti, navedeni trije proizvajalci izvozniki predstavljajo celoto izvoza s poreklom iz navedene države.
In order to assess whether, on a countrywide basis, the dumping margin was below de minimis, a weighted average countrywide dumping margin was established.
Da bi lahko ocenili, ali je bila na ravni države stopnja dampinga pod stopnjo de minimis, je bila določena tehtana povprečna stopnja dampinga na ravni države.
It was found that this margin was below de minimis because of the weight of Hyosung’s and Kolon’s exports as compared to Honeywell’s exports.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da je bila ta stopnja zaradi vrednosti izvoza Hyosunga in Kolona v primerjavi z izvozom Honeywella, pod stopnjo de minimis.
In view of the countrywide de minimis dumping margin, it has been concluded that the investigation should be terminated without the adoption of anti-dumping measures with regard to imports originating in the Republic of Korea, in accordance with Article 9(3) of the basic Regulation.
Glede na de minimis stopnjo dampinga na ravni države je bilo sklenjno, da se preiskava v skladu s členom 9(3) osnovne uredbe prekine brez sprejetja protidampinških ukrepov v zvezi z uvozom s poreklom iz Republike Koreje.
For the vast majority of the product types sold for export to the Community by both investigated Taiwanese companies, domestic sales were found to have been made in representative quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.
Za veliko večino vrste izdelkov, ki jih obe preiskovani tajvanski podjetji izvažata v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, da se blago prodaja v reprezentativnih količinah in v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
Normal value for these product types was based on the actual prices paid or payable, by independent customers in the domestic market of Taiwan, during the investigation period, as set out in Article 2(1) of the basic Regulation.
Normalna vrednost za te vrste izdelkov je bila v skladu s členom 2(1) osnovne uredbe osnovana na cenah, ki so jih neodvisni kupci na tajvanskem notranjem trgu v obdobju preiskave dejansko plačali ali bi jih morali plačati.
All sales of the product concerned made by the two exporting producers on the Community market were made directly to independent customers in the Community.
Celotna prodaja zadevnega izdelka obeh proizvajalcev izvoznikov na trgu Skupnosti je bila opravljena neposredno neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti.
Consequently, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
Tako je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na osnovi cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali plačljive.
For both investigated exporting producers allowances for differences in transport costs, ocean freight and insurance costs, handling, loading and ancillary costs, import charges and indirect taxes, credit costs, after-sales costs, commissions, discounts and rebates were granted where applicable and justified.
Kjer je bilo ustrezno in podprto s preverjenimi dokazi, so bila za oba preiskovana proizvajalca izvoznika odobrena nadomestila za razlike v stroških transporta, čezoceanskem tovoru, stroških zavarovanja, skladiščenja, natovarjanja in drugih tozadevnih stroških, uvoznih dajatvah in posrednih davkih, stroških posojil, poprodajnih stroških, provizijah, popustih in rabatih.
Since the level of co-operation was high (more than 80 % of the exports of the product concerned from Taiwan to the Community), the residual dumping margin was set at the same level as the one established for the co-operating exporting producer Far Eastern Textiles Corporation, namely 5,5 %.
Glede na visoko stopnjo sodelovanja (več kot 80 % izvoza zadevnega izdelka iz Tajvana v Skupnost) je bila preostala stopnja dampinga postavljena na enako stopnjo, kakor je stopnja dampinga sodelujočega izvoznega proizvajalca Far Eastern Textiles Corporation, namreč 5,5 %.
Definition of the Community Industry
Opredelitev industrije Skupnosti
Within the Community, the like product is manufactured by six producers, i.e. the two companies on behalf of which the complaint was lodged (Acordis and KoSa) and four additional producers.
V Skupnosti podoben izdelek izdeluje šest proizvajalcev, tj. dve podjetji, v imenu katerih je bila vložena pritožba (Acordis in KoSa), in še štirje drugi proizvajalci.
As indicated in recital 3 above, KoSa withdrew its support for the complaint on 8 March 2004.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 3 zgoraj, je podjetje KoSa 8. marca 2004 umaknilo podporo pritožbi.
One of the four other Community producers of the like product, the Spanish company Brilén, came forward after initiation to support the complaint and fully co-operated in the course of the proceeding.
Eden izmed štirih preostalih proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti, špansko podjetje Brilén, je po začetku postopka izrazil pripravljenost, da podpre pritožbo in v celoti sodeluje postopku.
Another Community producer, Honeywell, with production facilities, inter alia, in France submitted a questionnaire reply.
Drugi proizvajalec v Skupnosti, Honeywell, s proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi inter alia v Franciji, je predložil izpolnjen vprašalnik.
After the submission of the questionnaire reply, Honeywell decided to oppose the proceeding.
Po predložitvi vprašalnika se je podjetje Honeywell odločilo, da bo postopku nasprotovalo.
The two Community producers that support the investigation, Acordis and Brilén, represented together around 40 % of the Community production of the product concerned during the IP.
Oba proizvajalca Skupnosti, ki sta podprla preiskavo, Acordis in Brilén, sta skupaj predstavljala približno 40 % proizvodnje zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti v OP.
They are deemed to constitute the Community industry within the meaning of Article 4(1) and Article 5(4) of the basic Regulation and will hereafter be referred to as the ‘Community industry’.
Šteje se, da skupaj predstavljata industrijo Skupnosti v smislu člena 4(1) in člena 5(4) osnovne uredbe in bosta v nadaljevanju imenovana „industrija Skupnosti“.
Given that the Community industry comprises only two producers, data relating to the Community industry had to be indexed in order to preserve confidentiality, pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da industrijo Skupnosti sestavljata le dva proizvajalca, je bilo treba podatke, ki se nanašajo na industrijo Skupnosti indeksirati, da bi v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe ohranili tajnost podatkov.
Community consumption was established on the basis of the production of all producers of the like product in the Community, as estimated by the complainant, plus imports from all countries as reported by Eurostat, less exports to all countries as reported by Eurostat.
Poraba Skupnosti je bila določena na osnovi proizvodnje vseh proizvajalcev podobnega izdelka v Skupnosti glede na oceno pritožnika, s prištetjem uvozov iz vseh držav, ki jih je sporočil Statistični urad Evropskih skupnosti, in z odštetjem vseh izvozov v vse države, ki jih je sporočil Statistični urad Evropskih skupnosti.
The Community consumption was found to have remained substantially stable for the period considered as it increased by only 1 %.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da ostaja poraba Skupnosti v upoštevanem obdobju v znatni meri stabilna, saj se je povečevala le za 1 %.
Detailed data is as follows:
Natančni podatki so naslednji:
Volume of the dumped imports and market share
Obseg dampinškega uvoza in tržni delež
Given that there was only one Taiwanese exporting producer of the product concerned found to be dumping during the IP, data relating to imports of the product concerned into the Community from that exporting producer had to be indexed in order to preserve confidentiality pursuant to Article 19 of the basic Regulation.
Glede na to, da je bilo le pri enem tajvanskem proizvajalcu izvozniku zadevnega izdelka ugotovljeno, da je prodajal blago po dampinških cenah v OP , je bilo treba podatke, ki so se nanašali na uvoz zadevnega izdelka v Skupnost od proizvajalca izvoznika, indeksirati, da bi tako ohranili tajnost podatkov v skladu s členom 19 osnovne uredbe.
Information regarding volumes of dumped imports for the period between 2000 and the IP is based on that supplied by the co-operating exporting producer who was found to be dumping in the IP.
Podatki o obsegu dampinškega uvoza v obdobju med letoma 2000 in OP temeljijo na podatkih, ki jih je posredoval sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v OP prodajal blago po dampinških cenah.
Dumped imports originating in Taiwan decreased by 16 % between 2000 and 2001, but increased significantly in 2002 and during the IP for a total increase of 112 % during the period considered.
Dampinški uvoz s poreklom iz Tajvana se je med letoma 2000 in 2001 zmanjšal za 16 % in opazno povečal v letu 2002 ter v OP skupno povečal za 112 % v zadevnem obdobju.
The market share of dumped imports originating in Taiwan developed along the same lines.
Tržni delež dampinškega uvoza s poreklom iz Tajvana se je razvijal na podoben način.
It should be noted that such market share was limited during the period considered and was always below 4 %.
Opozoriti je treba, da je bil takšen tržni delež v upoštevanem obdobju omejen in nikoli ni presegel 4 %.
Volumes (tonnes)
Obseg (tone)
Cannot be disclosed (see recital 68 above)
Se ne razkrije (glej uvodno izjavo 68 zgoraj)
Information regarding prices of dumped imports for the period between 2000 and the IP is based on that supplied by the co-operating exporting producer who was found to be dumping in the IP.
Podatki o cenah dampinškega uvoza za obdobje med letoma 2000 in OP temeljijo na podatkih, ki jih je posredoval sodelujoči proizvajalec izvoznik, za katerega je bilo ugotovljeno, da je v OP prodajal blago po dampinških cenah.
Evolution of prices
Spreminjanje cen
According to data collected in the course of the investigation, import prices from Taiwan continually decreased by a total of 29 % during the period considered.
Glede na podatke, zbrane v teku preiskave, so se uvozne cene iz Tajvana v zadevnem obdobju stalno zniževale za skupaj 29 %.
Import Prices
Uvozne cene
EUR (per tonne)
EUR na tono
A comparison for comparable models of the product concerned was made between the exporting producer’s and the Community industry's average selling prices in the Community.
Med proizvajalci izvozniki in industrijo Skupnosti je bila narejena primerjava primerljivih modelov zadevnega proizvoda glede povprečne prodajne cene proizvoda v Skupnosti.
To this end, Community industry’s ex-works prices to unrelated customers, net of all rebates and taxes have been compared with the cif Community frontier prices of the Taiwanese exporting producer who was found to be dumping in the IP, duly adjusted for post importation costs.
Cene proizvoda franko tovarna industrije Skupnosti za nepovezane stranke, brez vseh rabatov in davkov, so primerjali s cenami CIF na meji Skupnosti za zadevnega proizvajalca izvoznike iz Tajvana, ustrezno prilagojenimi za pouvozne stroške.
The comparison showed that during the IP the product concerned originating in Taiwan sold in the Community undercut the Community industry's prices by around 25 %-30 %.
Primerjava je pokazala, da je v OP zadevni izdelek s poreklom iz Tajvana, prodan v Skupnosti nelojalno nižal cene industrije Skupnosti za okoli 25 %–30 %.
Pursuant to Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission examined all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the Community industry.
V skladu s členom 3(5) osnovne uredbe je Komisija preučila vse pomembne gospodarske dejavnike in indekse, ki zadevajo industrijo Skupnosti.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Proizvodnja, proizvodne zmogljivosti in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
After a period of relatively stable production between 2000 and 2002, the production of the product concerned by the Community industry increased by 4 % in the IP.
Po obdobju relativno stabilne proizvodnje med letoma 2000 in 2002, je proizvodnja zadevnega izdelka industrije Skupnosti v OP narasla za 4 %.