natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The concentration is therefore to be declared compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Merger Regulation and Article 57 of the EEA Agreement.
Koncentracija se zato razglasi za združljivo s skupnim trgom in Sporazumom EGP, v skladu s členom 8(1) Uredbe o združitvah in členom 57 Sporazuma EGP.
OJ C 297, 29.11.2005.
UL C 297, 29.11.2005.
Commission Decision of 2 June 1999 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.1469 — Solvay/BASF) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4069/89 (OJ C 197, 14.7.1999, p. 2).
Odločba Komisije z dne 2. junija 1999 o združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom (zadeva št. IV/M.1469 – Solvay/BASF) v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 4069/89 (UL C 197, 14.7.1999, str. 2).
Parts of this text have been edited to ensure that confidential information is not disclosed; those parts are enclosed in square brackets.
Deli tega besedila so urejeni tako, da je zagotovljeno, da zaupne informacije niso razkrite; ti deli so v oglatih oklepajih in označeni z zvezdico.
amending Decision 2004/4/EC authorising Member States temporarily to take emergency measures against the dissemination of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith as regards Egypt
o spremembi Odločbe 2004/4/ES o začasni dovolitvi državam članicam, da sprejmejo nujne ukrepe proti razširjanju Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith v zvezi z Egiptom
(notified under document number C(2005) 4525)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4525)
Under Commission Decision 2004/4/EC [2], tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. originating in Egypt must not in principle be introduced into the Community.
V skladu z Odločbo Komisije 2004/4/ES [2] je vnos gomoljev Solanum tuberosum L. s poreklom iz Egipta v Skupnost načelno prepovedan.
However, for the 2004/2005 import season, the entry into the Community of such tubers is permitted from ‘pest-free areas’ and subject to specific conditions.
Vendar je za uvozno sezono 2004/2005 vnos takih gomoljev v Skupnost dovoljen le iz neokuženih območij in ob upoštevanju posebnih pogojev.
During the 2004/2005 import season, a number of interceptions of Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith were recorded resulting in a prohibition on all exports of Egyptian potatoes to the Community as of 6 April 2005.
Med uvozno sezono 2004/2005 je bilo zabeleženih več primerov Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith, zato je bilo treba s 6. aprilom 2005 prepovedati ves izvoz krompirja iz Egipta v Skupnost.
Egypt has submitted a report into the causes of these interceptions.
Egipt je predložil poročilo o razlogih za te primere.
The main finding is that stricter measures need to be taken as regards producers, inspectors, exporters and packing stations failing to follow their instructions regarding the export of potatoes destined for the Community.
Najpomembnejša ugotovitev je, da je zaradi upoštevanja navodil v zvezi z izvozom krompirja v Skupnost treba sprejeti strožje ukrepe za proizvajalce, inšpektorje, izvoznike in pakirne postaje, ki se niso ravnali po navodilih.
Certain measures have already been taken in Egypt.
Nekateri ukrepi so že bili sprejeti v Egiptu.
It is appropriate to lay down at Community level requirements to ensure the effectiveness of inspections and controls carried out in Egypt on potatoes at the packing station and the port of dispatch prior to export to the Community.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitosti inšpekcij in pregledov krompirja, opravljenih na pakirnih postajah in neposredno pred izvozom v Skupnost v odpremnem pristanišču v Egiptu, je treba sprejeti zahteve na ravni Skupnosti.
In the light of the information provided by Egypt, the Commission has established that there is no risk of spreading Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith with the entry into the Community of tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. from pest-free areas of Egypt, provided that certain conditions are satisfied.
Na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je predložil Egipt, Komisija meni, da ni tveganja širjenja Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) Smith v Skupnost z gomolji Solanum tuberosum L. iz neokuženih področij Egipta, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
The entry into the Community of tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. originating in pest-free areas of Egypt should therefore be permitted for the 2005/2006 import season subject to specified conditions.
Vnos gomoljev Solanum tuberosum L. s poreklom iz Egipta v Skupnost se dovoli za uvozno sezono 2005/2006.
in paragraph 1, ‘2004/2005’ is replaced by ‘2005/2006’;
v odstavku 1 se „2004/2005“ nadomesti z „2005/2006“,
in paragraph 2, ‘2004/2005’ is replaced by ‘2005/2006’;
v odstavku 2 se „2004/2005“ nadomesti z „2005/2006“.
in Article 3, ‘2004/2005’ is replaced by ‘2005/2006’;
V členu 3 se „2004/2005“ nadomesti z „2005/2006“.
in Article 4, ‘30 August 2005’ is replaced by ‘30 August 2006’;
V členu 4 se „30. avgustom 2005“ nadomesti s „30. avgustom 2006“.
in Article 7, ‘30 September 2005’ is replaced by ‘30 September 2006’;
V členu 7 se „30. septembra 2005“ nadomesti s „30. septembra 2006“.
in point 1(b)(iii), ‘2004/2005’ is replaced by ‘2005/2006’;
v točki 1(b)(iii) se „2004/2005“ nadomesti z „2005/2006“;
in point 1(b)(iii), second indent, ‘1 January 2005’ is replaced by ‘1 January 2006’;
v drugi alinei točke 1(b)(iii) se „1. januarjem 2005“ nadomesti z „1. januarjem 2006“;
in point 1(b)(iii), the following third indent is added:
v točki 1(b)(iii) se doda tretja alinea;
officially monitored from the time of their arrival at the packing station until they are put into bags sealed in accordance with point 1(b)(x).’;
uradno nadzorovan v času od prispetja na pakirno postajo do pakiranja in zapiranja embalaže v skladu s točko 1(b)(x)“;
in point 1(b), point (v) is replaced by:
v točki 1(b) se točka (v) nadomesti z:
immediately prior to export to the Community, officially inspected at the port of dispatch by cutting 400 tubers from each pest-free area in a consignment drawn from at least ten bags per pest-free area;’
neposredno pred izvozom v Skupnost uradno pregledan v odpremnem pristanišču tako, da se prereže 400 gomoljev iz vsakega neokuženega območja v pošiljki in z najmanj desetih vreč iz vsakega neokuženega območja“;
in point 1(b)(xii), ‘1 January 2005’ is replaced by ‘1 January 2006’;
v točki 1(b)(xii) se „1. januarjem 2005“ nadomesti s „1. januarjem 2006“;
in point 5, second subparagraph, ‘2004/2005’ is replaced by ‘2005/2006’.
v točki 5 se drugi pododstavek „2004/2005“ nadomesti z „2005/2006“.
Decision as amended by Decision 2004/836/EC (OJ L 360, 7.12.2004, p. 30).
Odločba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/836/ES (UL L 360, 7.12.2004, str. 30).
of 28 November 2005
z dne 28. novembra 2005
providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Triticum durum, not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 66/402/EEC
o začasnem trženju določenega semena vrste Triticum durum, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev Direktive Sveta 66/402/EGS
(notified under document number C(2005) 4527)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 4527)
Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed [1], and in particular Article 17 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 66/402/EGS z dne 14. junija 1966 o trženju semena žit [1], in zlasti člena 17 Direktive,
In Austria the quantity of available seed of winter varieties of durum wheat (Triticum durum) suitable for the national climatic conditions and which satisfies the germination capacity requirements of Directive 66/402/EEC is insufficient and is therefore not adequate to meet the needs of the Member State.
V Avstriji je količina razpoložljivega semena ozimnih sort durum pšenice (Triticum durum), prilagojenih nacionalnim podnebnim razmeram in ki izpolnjujejo zahteve o kalivosti iz Direktive 66/402/EGS, nezadostna in zato ne more zadovoljiti potreb te države članice.
Accordingly, Austria should be authorised to permit the marketing of seed of that species subject to less stringent requirements for a period expiring on 15 November 2005.
V skladu s tem mora biti Avstrija pooblaščena, da dovoli trženje semena navedene vrste, za katerega veljajo manj stroge zahteve, za obdobje do 15. novembra 2005.
In addition, other Member States irrespective of whether the seed was harvested in a Member State or in a third country covered by Council Decision 2003/17/EC of 16 December 2002 on the equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and the equivalence of seed produced in third countries [2] which are in a position to supply Austria with seed of that species, should be authorised to permit the marketing of such seed.
Poleg tega morajo biti druge države članice, ki lahko oskrbijo Avstrijo s semenom navedene vrste, pooblaščene, da dovolijo trženje takega semena, ne glede na to, ali je bilo le-to požeto v državi članici ali v tretji državi, kot določa Odločba Sveta 2003/17/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o enakovrednosti poljskih pregledov semenskih posevkov v tretjih državah in o enakovrednosti semena, pridelanega v tretjih državah [2].
The marketing in the Community of seed of winter durum wheat which does not satisfy the minimum germination capacity requirements laid down in Directive 66/402/EEC shall be permitted, for a period expiring on 15 November 2005, in accordance with the terms set out in the Annex to this Decision and subject to the following conditions:
Trženje semena ozimne durum pšenice, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev o najmanjši sposobnosti kalivosti iz Direktive 66/402/EGS, se dovoli v Skupnosti za obdobje do 15. novembra 2005, v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v Prilogi k tej odločbi, in naslednjimi pogoji:
the germination capacity is at least 75 % of pure seed,
kalivost je vsaj 75 % od čistega semena;
the official label states the germination ascertained in the official examination or the examination carried out under official supervision pursuant to Article 2(1)(F)(d) and 2(1)(G)(d) of Directive 66/402/EEC,
uradna etiketa navaja kalivost, ugotovljeno v uradnem pregledu ali pregledu, opravljenem pod uradnim nadzorom v skladu s členoma 2(1)(F)(d) in 2(1)(G)(d) Direktive 66/402/EGS;
Any seed supplier wishing to place on the market the seed referred to in Article 1 shall apply to the Member State in which he is established.
Vsak dobavitelj semena, ki želi dati na trg seme iz člena 1, vloži zahtevek pri državi članici, v kateri ima sedež.
Austria shall act as coordinating Member State in order to ensure that the total amount authorised does not exceed the maximum quantity specified in the Annex.
Avstrija prevzame vlogo države članice koordinatorke za zagotovitev, da skupna odobrena količina ne presega največje količine, določene v Prilogi.
Any Member State receiving an application under Article 2 shall immediately notify the coordinating Member State of the amount covered by the application.
Vsaka država članica, ki prejme zahtevek iz člena 2, nemudoma uradno obvesti državo članico koordinatorko o količini iz zahtevka.
The co-ordinating Member State shall immediately inform the notifying Member State as to whether authorisation would result in the maximum quantity being exceeded.
Država članica koordinatorka nemudoma obvesti državo članico, ki ji je poslala uradno obvestilo, ali bo dovoljenje povzročilo preseganje največje količine.
Done at Brussels, 28 November 2005.
V Bruslju, 28. novembra 2005
on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
(notified under document number C(2005) 2673)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 2673)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 86(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 86(3) Pogodbe,
Article 16 of the Treaty requires the Community, without prejudice to Articles 73, 86 and 87, to use its powers in such a way as to make sure that services of general economic interest operate on the basis of principles and conditions which enable them to fulfil their missions.
Člen 16 Pogodbe določa, da brez poseganja v člene 73, 86 in 87 Skupnost v mejah svojih pristojnosti skrbi za to, da službe splošnega gospodarskega pomena delujejo na podlagi načel in pogojev, ki jim omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog.
For certain services of general economic interest to operate on the basis of principles and under conditions that enable them to fulfil their missions, financial support from the State intended to cover some or all of the specific costs resulting from the public service obligations may prove necessary.
Za delovanje nekaterih služb splošnega gospodarskega pomena na podlagi načel in pogojev, ki jim omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog, se lahko izkaže kot potrebna finančna podpora s strani države za pokrivanje nekaterih ali vseh posebnih stroškov, ki izhajajo iz obveznosti javnih storitev.
In accordance with Article 295 of the Treaty, as interpreted by the case-law of the Court of Justice and Court of First Instance of the European Communities, it is irrelevant from the viewpoint of Community law whether such services of general economic interest are operated by public or private undertakings.
V skladu s členom 295 Pogodbe na podlagi razlage sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z vidika zakonodaje Skupnosti ni pomembno, ali takšne storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena opravljajo javna ali zasebna podjetja.
Article 86(2) of the Treaty states in this respect that undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly are subject to the rules contained in the Treaty, in particular to the rules on competition.
V zvezi s tem člen 86(2) Pogodbe navaja, da za podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, oziroma podjetja, ki imajo značaj dohodkovnega monopola, veljajo pravila iz Pogodbe, zlasti pravila o konkurenci.
However, Article 86(2) allows an exception from the rules contained in the Treaty, provided that a number of criteria are met.
Člen 86(2) pa dopušča odstopanje od pravil, ki jih vsebuje Pogodba, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjena nekatera merila.
Firstly, there must be an act of entrustment, whereby the State confers responsibility for the execution of a certain task to an undertaking.
Prvič, obstajati mora akt o pooblastitvi, s katerim država pooblašča podjetje za opravljanje določene naloge.
Secondly, the entrustment must relate to a service of general economic interest.
Drugič, pooblastitev se mora nanašati na storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Thirdly, the exception has to be necessary for the performance of the tasks assigned and proportional to that end (hereinafter the necessity requirement).
Tretjič, odstopanje mora biti nujno za opravljanje dodeljenih nalog in sorazmerno z navedenim namenom (v nadaljnjem besedilu „pogoj o nujnosti“).
Finally, the development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.
Razvoj trgovine prav tako ne sme biti prizadet v takšnem obsegu, ki bi bil v nasprotju z interesi Skupnosti.
In its judgment in the case of Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [1] (Altmark), the Court of Justice held that public service compensation does not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 87 of the Treaty provided that four cumulative criteria are met.
V svoji sodbi v zadevi Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH [1] („Altmark“) je Sodišče odločilo, da nadomestilo za javne storitve ne pomeni državne pomoči v smislu člena 87 Pogodbe ES, pod pogojem, da so izpolnjena štiri kumulativna merila.
First, the recipient undertaking must actually have public service obligations to discharge, and the obligations must be clearly defined.
Prvič, podjetju, ki prejme nadomestilo, mora biti dejansko zaupano izpolnjevanje obveznosti javnih storitev, obveznosti pa morajo biti jasno določene.
Second, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated must be established in advance in an objective and transparent manner.
Drugič, parametre, na podlagi katerih se izračuna nadomestilo, je treba določiti vnaprej na objektiven in pregleden način.
Third, the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of the public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit.
Tretjič, nadomestilo ne sme presegati zneska, potrebnega za pokrivanje vseh ali nekaterih stroškov, ki nastanejo zaradi izpolnjevanja obveznosti javnih storitev, ob upoštevanju ustreznih prejemkov in zmernega dobička.
Finally, where the undertaking which is to discharge public service obligations, in a specific case, is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure which would allow for the selection of the tenderer capable of providing those services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run and adequately provided with means of transport, would have incurred.
Nazadnje, če podjetje, ki naj bi izpolnjevalo obveznosti javnih storitev, v danem primeru ni izbrano v skladu s postopkom oddaje javnih naročil, ki naj bi omogočil izbiro ponudnika, sposobnega, da te storitve skupnosti zagotovi po najnižjih stroških, je treba stopnjo potrebnega nadomestila določiti na podlagi analize stroškov, ki bi nastali v tipičnem podjetju, ki je dobro vodeno in ima zagotovljena ustrezna transportna sredstva.
Where those four criteria are met, public service compensation does not constitute State aid, and Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty do not apply.
Če so izpolnjena navedena štiri merila, nadomestilo za javne storitve ne pomeni državne pomoči ter se ne uporabljata člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe.
If the Member States do not respect those criteria and if the general criteria for the applicability of Article 87(1) of the Treaty are met, public service compensation constitutes State aid that is subject to Articles 73, 86, 87 and 88 of the Treaty.
Če države članice ne spoštujejo navedenih meril in če so izpolnjena splošna merila za uporabo člena 87(1) Pogodbe, nadomestilo za javne storitve pomeni državno pomoč v skladu s členi 73, 86, 87 in 88 Pogodbe.
This Decision should therefore only apply to public service compensation in so far as it constitutes State aid.
To odločbo je zato treba uporabljati le za nadomestilo za javne storitve, v kolikor pomeni državno pomoč.
Article 86(3) of the Treaty allows the Commission to specify the meaning and extent of the exception under Article 86(2) of the Treaty, and to set out rules intended to enable effective monitoring of the fulfilment of the criteria set out in Article 86(2), where necessary.
Člen 86(3) Pogodbe omogoča Komisiji, da opredeli pomen in obseg odstopanja v skladu s členom 86(2) Pogodbe in po potrebi določi pravila, namenjena omogočanju učinkovitega spremljanja izpolnjevanja meril iz člena 86(2).
The conditions under which certain systems of compensation are compatible with Article 86(2) and are not subject to the prior notification requirement of Article 88(3) of the Treaty should therefore be specified.
Zato je treba določiti pogoje, pod katerimi so nekateri sistemi nadomestil združljivi s členom 86(2) in jih ni treba predhodno priglasiti v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe.
Such aid may be declared compatible only if it is granted in order to ensure the provision of services that are services of general economic interest as referred to in Article 86(2) of the Treaty.
Takšna pomoč se lahko šteje za združljivo le, če je dodeljena za zagotovitev opravljanja storitev, ki pomenijo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena iz člena 86(2) Pogodbe.
It is clear from the case-law that, with the exception of the sectors in which there are Community rules governing the matter, Member States have a wide margin of discretion in the definition of services that could be classified as being services of general economic interest.
Iz sodne prakse izhaja, da imajo države članice, z izjemo sektorjev, v katerih je področje urejeno z zakonodajo Skupnosti, visoko stopnjo diskrecije pri uvrščanju storitev med storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Thus, with the exception of the sectors in which there are Community rules governing the matter, the Commission’s task is to ensure that there is no manifest error as regards the definition of services of general economic interest.
Z izjemo sektorjev, v katerih je področje urejeno z zakonodajo Skupnosti, je torej naloga Komisije zagotoviti, da pri opredeljevanju storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena ni očitnih napak.
In order for Article 86(2) of the Treaty to apply, the undertaking beneficiary of the aid must have been specifically entrusted by the Member State with the operation of a particular service of general economic interest.
Za uporabo člena 86(2) Pogodbe mora država članica podjetje, ki prejme pomoč, izrecno pooblastiti za opravljanje posebne storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
According to the case-law on the interpretation of Article 86(2) of the Treaty, such act or acts of entrustment must specify, at least, the precise nature, scope and duration of the public service obligations imposed and the identity of the undertakings concerned.
V skladu s sodno prakso v zvezi z razlago člena 86(2) Pogodbe mora takšen akt ali akti o pooblastitvi podrobno določati vsaj natančno vrsto, obseg in trajanje dodeljenih obveznosti javnih storitev in identiteto zadevnih podjetij.
In order to ensure that the criteria set out in Article 86(2) of the Treaty are met, it is necessary to lay down more precise conditions which must be fulfilled in respect of the entrustment of the operation of services of general economic interest.
Za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja meril iz člena 86(2) je treba določiti natančnejše pogoje, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni glede pooblastitve opravljanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Indeed the amount of compensation can be properly calculated and checked only if the public service obligations incumbent on the undertakings and any obligations incumbent on the State are clearly set out in a formal act of the competent public authorities within the Member State concerned.
Znesek nadomestila se dejansko lahko ustrezno izračuna in pregleda le, če so obveznosti javnih storitev, ki jih imajo podjetja, in obveznosti, ki jih ima država, jasno določene v javnem aktu pristojnih javnih organov v zadevni državi članici.
The form of the instrument may vary from one Member State to another but it should specify, at least, the precise nature, scope and duration of the public service obligations imposed and the identity of undertakings concerned, and the costs to be borne by the undertaking concerned.
Oblika instrumenta se lahko razlikuje od ene države članice do druge, vendar mora določati vsaj natančno vrsto, obseg in trajanje dodeljenih obveznosti javnih storitev in identiteto zadevnih podjetij ter stroške, ki jih mora prevzeti zadevno podjetje.
When defining public service obligations and in assessing whether those obligations are met by the undertakings concerned, the Member States are invited to consult widely, with particular emphasis on users.
Pri določanju obveznosti javnih storitev in pri presoji, ali zadevna podjetja izpolnjujejo navedene obveznosti, so države članice pozvane k obsežnemu posvetovanju s posebnim upoštevanjem uporabnikov.