natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of Taiwan, imports decreased during 2001 when the anti-circumvention investigation was under way but increased again during the IP to a level representing approximately 4 % of Community consumption.
V primeru Tajvana se je uvoz znižal v letu 2001, ko je potekala preiskava proti izogibanju, vendar se je v OP spet zvišal na stopnjo približno 4 % porabe Skupnosti.
While the level of imports from Taiwan continues to be relatively high, it must be borne in mind that not all exports from Taiwan are subject to the extended duties resulting from the anti-circumvention review.
Čeprav je stopnja uvoza iz Tajvana še naprej razmeroma visoka, je treba upoštevati, da ves izvoz iz Tajvana ni podvržen razširjenim dajatvam, ki so bile posledica pregleda proti izogibanju.
It is also to be noted that during the analysis period the prices of imports from Taiwan, were 10 to 20 % higher than imports originating in the PRC, not taking into account the anti-dumping duties applicable to imports originating in the PRC, and that Taiwanese prices did not undercut the Community industry prices during the IP.
Treba je tudi poudariti, da so bile cene uvoza iz Tajvana v analiznem obdobju od 10 do 20 % višje od uvoza s poreklom iz LRK, pri čemer se ne upošteva protidampinških dajatev za uvoz s poreklom iz LRK in dejstva, da tajvanske cene niso nelojalno nižale cen industrije Skupnosti v OP.
Imports from all other countries are made at prices very close to those of the Community industry.
Uvoz iz vseh ostalih držav poteka po cenah, ki so zelo blizu cenam industrije Skupnosti.
Situation of the Community industry
Položaj industrije Skupnosti
In order to make a meaningful assessment of certain injury indicators, it was necessary to exclude data in respect of the producer referred to in recital 52 in those cases where this data may have been influenced by companies within the group structure but located outside the Community.
Da bi dobro ocenili nekatere kazalce škode, je bilo treba izključiti podatke o proizvajalcu iz uvodne izjave (52) zgoraj v tistih primerih, v katerih bi na te podatke lahko vplivala podjetja, ki sicer spadajo v skupino, a imajo sedež izven Skupnosti.
Since the profitability of the European operations of this company are affected by the results achieved by its whole supply chain, including its headquarters located outside the Community, it was deemed appropriate to exclude the data from this company from the analysis of indicators in sections (f) profitability and (h) cash flow and ability to raise capital, as well as from the analysis of ‘return on investment’ in section (g) Investments and return on investments.
Ker rezultati, ki jih dosega cela skupina, vključno s sedežem podjetja izven Skupnosti, vplivajo na donosnost evropskega poslovanja tega podjetja, se je zdelo primerno, da se podatki o tem podjetju izključijo iz analize kazalcev v delih (f) Donosnost in (h) Denarni tokovi in zmožnost zbrati kapital, pa tudi iz analize o „donosu naložb“ v delu (g) Naložbe in donos naložb.
Furthermore, as this company resulted from the merger of two previously independent entities, it was not in a position to provide information for the whole of the analysis period in relation to sales prices and employment.
Poleg tega pa podjetje, ker je izšlo iz združitve dveh predhodno neodvisnih družb, informacij o prodajnih cenah in zaposlenosti za celotno analizno obdobje ni moglo priskrbeti.
For that reason, it was also necessary to exclude the available information from the analysis of the trends in sections (e) Sales prices and costs and (i) Employment, productivity and wages.
Zato je bilo treba iz analize trendov v delih (e) Prodajne cene in stroški in (i) Zaposlenost, produktivnost in plače izključiti tudi dostopne informacije.
As this company only accounted for in the range of 15 % to 25 % of Community production of the product concerned, the findings set out below are considered to be representative.
Ker je to podjetje pri proizvodnji zadevnega izdelka pokrilo le od 15 % do 25 % proizvodnje Skupnosti, se spodnje ugotovitve upošteva za reprezentančne.
Production, production capacity and capacity utilisation
Proizvodnja, proizvodna zmogljivost in izkoriščenost zmogljivosti
Production of glyphosate by the Community industry increased from 48334 tonnes in 1999 to a peak of 54575 tonnes in 2000 and then decreased to a quantity of 50448 tonnes in the IP.
Proizvodnja glifosata v industriji Skupnosti je narasla z 48334 ton v letu 1999 na rekordnih 54575 ton leta 2000 in nato padla na količino 50448 ton v OP.
This represents an overall increase of 4 % over the analysis period.
To predstavlja skupno povečanje 4 % v analiznem obdobju.
Production capacity increased from around 63000 tonnes in 1999 to almost 70000 tonnes in the IP, an increase of 11 %.
Proizvodna zmogljivost je narasla z okrog 63000 ton leta 1999 na skoraj 70000 ton v OP, kar predstavlja 11-odstotno povečanje.
The increase during 2000 and 2001 is due to additional production facilities becoming operational combined with continued refinements in the production process.
Povečanje v letih 2000 in 2001 je rezultat dodatnih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, ki so začele delovati, in nadaljnjih izboljšav proizvodnega procesa.
Capacity utilisation initially increased from 77 % to 83 % in 2000, but then decreased through 2001 to a level of 72 % during the IP, an overall decrease of five percentage points compared with 1999.
Izkoriščenost zmogljivosti je najprej narasla z 77 % na 83 % leta 2000, a je nato leta 2001 padla na stopnjo 72 % v OP, kar je predstavljalo padec 5 odstotnih točk glede na leto 1999.
The economic effect of the existence of decreased capacity utilisation was examined and it was found that its impact on profitability was not significant.
Gospodarski učinek zmanjšane izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti je bil raziskan in ugotovilo se je, da nima znatnega vpliva na donosnost.
The decreasing capacity utilisation, in the light of increasing sales of the product concerned in the Community, is negatively affected by the development of export sales of the Community industry to third countries.
Na upadajočo izkoriščenost zmogljivosti, v luči naraščajoče prodaje zadevnega izdelka v Skupnosti, negativno vpliva razvoj izvozne prodaje industrije Skupnosti v tretje države.
During the analysis period, export sales of the Community industry steadily decreased from 58 % of its world-wide sales in 1999 to 38 % of its world-wide sales in the IP.
V analiznem obdobju je izvozna prodaja industrije Skupnosti neprekinjeno upadala z 58 % njene svetovne prodaje leta 1999 na 38 % v OP.
Both the production and capacity utilisation figures for 2001 and 2002 were affected by a decrease in production by one Community producer due to its decision to import certain glyphosate products from related companies in third countries rather than producing them in the Community.
Padec proizvodnje enega proizvajalca Skupnosti, ker se je ta odločil raje uvoziti nekatere glifosatne izdelke iz povezanih podjetij v tretjih državah, kot pa da bi jih proizvajal v Skupnosti, je vplival tako na podatke o proizvodnji in izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti za leti 2001 in 2002.
The products in question are newly developed forms which require additional production equipment, currently unavailable in the Community.
Ti uvoženi izdelki so novo razvite oblike, za katere je potrebna dodatna proizvodna oprema, ki trenutno v Skupnosti ni na voljo.
The deterioration in these injury indicators in 2001 and 2002 should be considered in the light of this development which has been mentioned in recital 61.
Poslabšanje v teh kazalcih škode za leti 2001 in 2002 je treba obravnavati v luči razvoja, ki je bil omenjen v uvodni izjavi (61) zgoraj.
The detailed data is as follows:
Podrobni podatki so, kot sledi:
Table 5
Preglednica 5
(tonnes at 95 % acid equivalent)
(ton, enakovrednih 95-odstotni kislini)
Production capacity
Proizvodna zmogljivost
Stocks of glyphosate increased over the analysis period from 9149 tonnes in 1999 to 14554 tonnes in the IP, an increase of 59 %.
Zaloge glifosata so se v analiznem obdobju povečale z 9149 ton leta 1999 na 14554 ton v OP, kar je povečanje za 59 %.
The main build up occurred in 2001 and 2002.
Glavno nalaganje se je pojavilo v letih 2001 in 2002.
This reflects the efforts of the Community producers to maintain high capacity utilisation in order to cover the fixed costs of their plants, while at the same time the market was not able to absorb those quantities.
To je odraz truda proizvajalcev Skupnosti, da bi obdržali visoko stopnjo izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti, da bi s tem lahko pokrili stalne stroške obratov, čeprav hkrati trg ni mogel vsrkati teh količin.
Detailed data is shown below:
Podrobni podatki so prikazani spodaj:
Table 6
Preglednica 6
A party in the PRC argued that the build up of stocks by the Community industry could not be attributed to the effect of imports from the PRC but that it just related to decreased sales by the Community industry on export markets.
Stranka iz LRK je trdila, da povečevanja zalog industrije Skupnosti ni mogoče pripisati vplivu uvoza iz LRK, temveč je povezan le z upadom prodaje industrije Skupnosti na izvozne trge.
In this regard, it should be noted that competition from PRC glyphosate, which was imported under inward processing and subsequently exported, also contributed to the decreased sales by the Community industry on the export market.
V zvezi s tem je potrebno opozoriti, da je konkurenca glifosata iz LRK, ki je bil uvožen v okviru aktivnega oplemenitenja ponovno izvožen, tudi prispevala k znižanju prodaje industrije Skupnosti na izvoznem trgu.
Sales volume, market share and growth
Obseg prodaje, tržni delež in rast
The sales on the Community market of glyphosate produced by the Community industry increased steadily during the analysis period from 19945 tonnes in 1999 to 29607 tonnes in the IP, an overall increase of 48 %.
Prodaja glifosata industrije Skupnosti na trgu Skupnosti je v analiznem obdobju neprekinjeno naraščala z 19945 ton leta 1999 na 29607 ton v OP, kar je splošni dvig za 48 %.
Similarly, the Community industry increased its market share from 80 % in 1999 to 85 % in the IP, having reached a level of 89 % during 2001.
Podobno je industrija Skupnosti povečala svoj tržni delež z 80 % leta 1999 na 85 % v OP, potem ko je leta 2001 dosegla stopnjo 89 %.
The decrease in market share from 2001 to 2002 was affected by imports of glyphosate from third countries by a Community producer, as mentioned in recital 71.
Na padec tržnega deleža od 2001 do 2002 je vplival uvoz glifosata iz tretjih držav, ki ga je izvedel proizvajalec Skupnosti, kot je bilo omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (71) zgoraj.
Table 7
Preglednica 7
Community industry sales
Prodaja industrije Skupnosti
Community industry market share
Tržni delež industrije Skupnosti
Sales prices and costs
Prodajne cene in stroški
Prices were compared at the formulated stage, as this is the form of glyphosate that is used by the final consumer as a herbicide.
Cene se je primerjalo za formulirane izdelke, ker je to oblika glifosata, ki jo končni potrošnik uporablja kot herbicid.
Additionally, formulated glyphosate accounts for the vast majority of glyphosate sales both in terms of value and of volume. In order to ensure a fair comparison of prices, and given the existence of a variety of types of formulated glyphosate on the market, the prices of which can vary considerably both according to the concentration of the product and the type of surfactant used, the Commission services selected the most common formulation, a standard formulation which has 360g of glyphosate content per litre.
Poleg tega formulirani glifosat predstavlja večino prodaje glifosata, tako glede vrednosti kot obsega.
This so-called ‘standard 360 formulation’ accounted for around 40 % by volume of glyphosate sales in the Community by the Community industry during the analysis period and, because it is now outside of patent, is the typical formulation that is either imported from the PRC or made from imported acid or salt originating in the PRC.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo cen in glede na to, da na trgu obstaja vrsta različnih tipov formuliranega glifosata, katerega cene se lahko zelo razlikujejo tako glede na koncentracijo izdelka kot na vrsto uporabljene površinsko aktivne snovi, so službe Komisije izbrale najpogostejšo obliko, in sicer standardni formulirani pripravek, ki vsebuje 360 gramov glifosata na liter. Tako imenovani „standardni pripravek 360“ je po obsegu v OP predstavljal okrog 40 % prodaje glifosata industrije Skupnosti v Skupnosti, ker pa mu je sedaj potekel patent, je to tipični pripravek, ki se uvaža iz LRK ali ki jo izdelujejo iz uvožene kisline ali soli s poreklom iz LRK.
Additionally, for this comparison, formulated glyphosate produced by the Community industry containing special surfactants designed to make the product less hazardous, were considered separately.
Poleg tega se je za to primerjavo ločeno upošteval formulirani glifosat industrije Skupnosti, ki vsebuje posebne površinsko aktivne snovi, ki zmanjšujejo nevarnost izdelka.
Sales of this non-hazardous formulation containing also 360g of glyphosate per litre accounted for around 20 % by volume of glyphosate sales in the Community by the Community industry during the analysis period.
Prodaja tega nenevarnega pripravka, ki tudi vsebuje 360 gramov glifosata na liter, je po obsegu predstavljala okrog 20 % prodaje glifosata industrije Skupnosti v Skupnosti v analiznem obdobju.
Glyphosate acid normally accounted for around 18 % by volume of the total glyphosate sales in the Community by the Community industry during the analysis period, the remainder consisting of glyphosate salt and other non-standard formulations containing a different glyphosate content per litre and/or special surfactants to improve the effectiveness or hazard classification.
Glifosatna kislina je predstavljala po obsegu navadno okrog 18 % skupne prodaje glifosata industrije Skupnosti v Skupnosti v analiznem obdobju, ostalo pa so predstavljali glifosatna sol in drugi nestandardni pripravki z različno vsebnostjo glifosata na liter in/ali s posebnimi površinsko aktivnimi snovmi za izboljšanje učinkovitosti ali razvrščanja glede na nevarne lastnosti.
Glyphosate acid is the main element in the cost of production for glyphosate formulation.
Glifosatna kislina je glavni element pri stroških proizvodnje formuliranega glifosata.
For standard 360 formulation it accounts for around 55 % of the total cost of production and for around 45 % in the case of non-hazardous 360 formulation.
Pri standardnem pripravku 360 predstavlja okrog 55 % celotnih stroškov proizvodnje, pri nenevarnem pripravku 360 pa okrog 45 %.
The sales prices of standard 360 formulated glyphosate, expressed per kilogram at 95 % acid equivalent (the equivalent of 2,64 litres of formulated product), fell steadily from EUR 9,23 in 1999 to EUR 7,28 in 2002, an overall decrease of 21 %.
Prodajne cene na kilogram standardnega formuliranega glifosata 360, enakovrednega 95-odstotni kislini (enakovredno 2,64 litroma formuliranega izdelka), so neprekinjeno padale z 9,23 EUR leta 1999 na 7,28 EUR leta 2002, skupaj so torej padle za 21 %.
Cost of production also fell steadily from EUR 10,37 in 1999 to EUR 8,14 in the IP, a total decrease of 21 %.
Tudi stroški proizvodnje so neprekinjeno padali z 10,37 EUR leta 1999 na 8,14 EUR v OP, skupaj so torej padli za 21 %.
This product was unprofitable throughout the analysis period, although the gap between cost of production and sales price remained relatively stable over the period.
Ta izdelek je bil v analiznem obdobju vseskozi nedonosen, čeprav je bila v tem obdobju razlika med stroški proizvodnje in prodajnimi cenami razmeroma stalna.
Table 8
Preglednica 8
Standard 360 formulation
Standardni pripravek 360
Quantity sold
Prodana količina
% of EU sales
% prodaje v EU
Sales price
Prodajna cena
(EUR per kg at 95 % acid equivalent)
(EUR na kg, enakovrednih 95-odstotni kislini)
Cost of production
Stroški proizvodnje
For non-hazardous formulated glyphosate containing 360 g of glyphosate per litre, the sales price, expressed per kilogram at 95 % acid equivalent (the equivalent of 2,64 litres of formulated product), fell steadily from 1999 to 2002 for an overall decrease of 12 %.
Pri nenevarnem formuliranem glifosatu, ki vsebuje 360 gramov glifosata na liter, je prodajna cena, izražena na kilogram, enakovreden 95-odstotni kislini (enakovredno 2,64 litroma formuliranega izdelka), od 1999 do 2002 neprekinjeno padala, za skupaj 12 %.
Cost of production also fell from 1999 to 2001, but increased again in the IP for an overall decrease of 22 %.
Stroški proizvodnje so se od 1999 do 2001 tudi znižali, a so spet narasli v OP, tako da je bil skupni padec 22-odstoten.
The increase in cost of production in the IP is due to reduced capacity utilisation.
Povišanje stroškov proizvodnje v OP je nastalo zaradi zmanjšane izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti.
The profitability of this product increased in the course of the analysis period.
Donosnost tega izdelka je narasla v analiznem obdobju.
Table 9
Preglednica 9
Non-hazardous 360 formulation
Nenevarni pripravek 360
The table below shows the combined weighted average sales price and cost of production for all forms of glyphosate, i.e. salt, acid and all types of formulated products.
Preglednica spodaj prikazuje skupno ponderirano povprečno prodajno ceno in stroške proizvodnje za vse oblike glifosata, tj. soli, kisline in vseh vrst formuliranih izdelkov.
Sales prices and cost of production seemingly increased in 2001.
Prodajne cene in stroški proizvodnje so očitno narasli leta 2001.
The reason for this is a change in the product mix sold on the Community market, i.e. the Community industry sold less of the lower-value acid and salt products on the Community market.
To pa zato, ker se je spremenila mešanica snovi v izdelku v prodaji na trgu Skupnosti, kar pomeni, da je industrija Skupnosti prodala manj kislinskih in solnih izdelkov nizke vrednosti na trgu Skupnosti.
Table 10
Preglednica 10
All products
Vsi izdelki
Profitability
Donosnost
The overall profitability of the Community Industry in respect of glyphosate activities deteriorated from 4,2 % in 1999 to – 2,6 % in the IP.
Skupna donosnost industrije Skupnosti v glifosatni dejavnosti se je zmanjšala z 4,2 % leta 1999 na – 2,6 % v OP.
This profitability relates to all forms of glyphosate produced and sold by the Community industry in the Community.
Ta donosnost se nanaša na vse oblike glifosata, ki jih industrija Skupnosti proizvaja in prodaja v Skupnosti.
Glyphosate imported and resold, as mentioned at recital 71, has not been included in this calculation.
Uvoženi glifosat za ponovno prodajo ni del tega izračuna, kot je omenjeno v uvodni izjavi (71) zgoraj.
A party in the PRC argued that the product which was imported and resold should have been included in the assessment of overall profitability.
Stranka iz LRK je trdila, da bi v oceni skupne donosnosti morali upoštevati tudi glifosat, ki je bil uvožen in ponovno prodan.
In this regard, these products have been correctly excluded since they do not contribute to the profitability of the Community industry relating to production and sales in the Community.
Ti izdelki so bili pravilno izključeni, saj ne prispevajo k donosnosti industrije Skupnosti pri proizvodnji in prodaji v Skupnosti.
The argument is therefore rejected.
Ugovor se torej zavrne.
Overall profitability was also negatively affected by the mix of products sold by the Community industry on the Community market.
Na skupno donosnost je negativno vplivala tudi mešanica izdelkov, ki jo je industrija Skupnosti prodajala na trgu Skupnosti.
The Community industry planned to move away from the ‘standard’ glyphosate formulation, which has been selling at a loss under pressure from low priced imports, mainly from the PRC and Taiwan, towards more sophisticated, higher value products such as the non-hazardous formulations.
Industrija Skupnosti se je nameravala odmakniti od „standardnega“ glifosatnega pripravka, ki se je zaradi pritiska poceni izdelkov, predvsem iz LRK in Tajvana, prodajal z izgubami in se je nameravala približati bolj dodelanim izdelkom višje vrednosti, kot so nenevarni pripravki.
However, during the IP, sales of these higher value products produced within the Community decreased due to a weaker demand for these products, having a negative effect on overall profitability.
Vendar pa je prodaja teh izdelkov višje vrednosti, izdelanih v Skupnosti, v OP zaradi manjšega povpraševanja po teh izdelkih upadla, kar je imelo negativen učinek na skupno donosnost.
The profitability figures are given in table 11.
Podatki o donosnosti so navedeni v Preglednici 11 spodaj.
Glyphosate is also sold by importers/formulators on the Community market.
Glifosat prodajajo na trgu Skupnosti tudi uvozniki/formulatorji.
These sales, almost exclusively of standard 360 formulation glyphosate, which is the biggest selling product of the Community industry, compete directly with the sales by the Community industry of the same formulation.
Ta prodaja skoraj izključno standardnega glifosatnega pripravka 360, ki je najbolje prodajan izdelek industrije Skupnosti, neposredno tekmuje s prodajo industrije Skupnosti enakega pripravka.
The glyphosate in question is sourced either as acid or salt primarily from Community producers, but is also imported from third countries.
Omenjeni glifosat se dobavlja kot kislina ali sol predvsem od proizvajalcev Skupnosti, uvaža pa se tudi iz tretjih držav.
While sales by the Community industry to supply the demand of this standard formulation have not been profitable, nevertheless, the Community industry needs to continue to supply them as these sales provide a contribution to cover their fixed costs through the maintenance of capacity utilisation.
Čeprav prodaja industrije Skupnosti za zadostitev povpraševanja po tem standardnem pripravku ni prinesla dobička, pa ga mora industrija Skupnosti vseeno še naprej dobavljati, saj ta prodaja prispeva k pokritju stalnih stroškov, tako da vzdržuje izkoriščenost zmogljivosti.
Table 11
Preglednica 11
(Community sales)
(prodaja Skupnosti)
Investments and return on investments
Naložbe in donos naložb
Investment in the glyphosate business decreased sharply after 1999 to between 15 % and 18 % of the 1999 figures.
Naložbe v glifosatno dejavnost so po letu 1999 strmo upadle, in sicer na delež od 15 do 18 % naložb v letu 1999.
It has to be noted that the bulk of the investments relating to the capacity increases in 2001 were made in the years up to 1999.
Treba je zabeležiti, da je večino naložb v povečanje zmogljivosti leta 2001 nastalo v letih pred 1999.
No significant investment was planned or made for the remainder of the analysis period.
V ostalih letih analiznega obdobja ni bilo načrtovanih ali izvedenih večjih naložb.
Table 12
Preglednica 12
Investments
Naložbe
(EUR '000)
(v tisočih evrov)
Return on investment
Donos naložb
negative
negativen
Cash flow and ability to raise capital
Denarni tokovi in zmožnost zbrati kapital
Cash flow of the Community industry deteriorated between 1999 and the IP, both in absolute values as well as expressed as a percentage of turnover.
Denarni tokovi industrije Skupnosti so se od 1999 do OP znižali, tako v absolutni vrednosti kot tudi izraženi v odstotkih prometa.
This decrease is in line with the deterioration of the overall profitability during the analysis period.
To znižanje se ujema z upadom skupne donosnosti v analiznem obdobju.
Table 13
Preglednica 13
Cash flow
Denarni tokovi
Cash flow expressed as percentage of turnover
Denarni tokovi, izraženi v odstotkih prometa
Capital is either raised on the stock exchange or alternatively funded internally within the company.
Kapital se zbere na borzi, druga možnost pa je, da se zbere znotraj podjetja.
Investments and, in some cases, spending for R&D have been limited in recent years reflecting the decreasing profitability of glyphosate sales.
Naložbe, in v nekaterih primerih poraba za raziskave in razvoj, so bila v zadnjih letih omejena zaradi znižane donosnosti prodaje glifosata.
The absence of significant investments since 2000 is confirmed by the figures given in recital 85.
Pomanjkanje večjih naložb od leta 2000 potrjujejo številke v uvodni izjavi (85) zgoraj.