natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The choice of precisely this land belonging to ASL is consistent with the political considerations and is attributable to its unique infrastructure links, as confirmed by the Lower Saxony Investment and Promotion Agency.
Izbor ravno tega zemljišča družbe ASL je v skladu s političnimi preudarki in se pojasni z enkratnimi infrastrukturnimi povezavami zemljišča, kar potrjuje Agencija za naložbe in pospeševanje („Investment and Promotion Agency“) na Spodnjem Saškem.
The Commission acknowledges that, for this price, a private developer would not be able to buy the bare land, to develop it, to provide the required infrastructure and to sell the developed land at a profit.
Komisija priznava, da zasebno razvojno podjetje ne bi bilo zmožno za takšno ceno kupiti komunalno neopremljenega zemljišča, ga komunalno urediti, urediti potrebno infrastrukturo in ga potem dobičkonosno prodati.
Some of the arguments put forward by Germany, e.g. the legal framework applicable to municipalities, may explain this.
Nekateri argumenti, ki jih navaja Nemčija, kot je npr. za občine veljaven pravni okvir, to lahko pojasnijo.
A further assessment is, however, not necessary since, given the basic conditions of this case, the two conclusions referred to above, firstly that the municipality did not buy the land at a price above the market price and secondly that it did not buy the land in the interests of ASL but in accordance with its integrated planning and on the basis of wider political considerations, are sufficient for it to be stated that no specific advantage was conferred on ASL.
Nadaljnja presoja te zadeve pa ni potrebna, saj v okvirnih pogojih tega primera zgoraj navedena zaključka, prvič, da občina ni kupila zemljišč po ceni, ki je višja od tržne, in drugič, da občina ni kupila zemljišč v interesu družbe ASL temveč v skladu s svojim celotnim načrtom in na podlagi razširjenih političnih preudarkov, zadostujeta za ugotovitev, da ASL ni uživala posebne ugodnosti.
The remaining doubts expressed in the Commission decision initiating the procedure are no longer relevant.
Ostali dvomi, izraženi v sklepu Komisije o sprožitvi procesa, niso več pomembni.
As regards the acquisition of the ‘south’ site, the Commission can accept Germany’s arguments.
Komisija se strinja z argumenti Nemčije glede nakupa zemljiške parcele „jug“.
Moreover, any aid in this connection would, under no circumstances, exceed the de minimis threshold of EUR 100000.
Poleg tega morebitna pomoč tu v nobenem primeru ne bi prekoračila minimalne meje 100000 EUR.
The Commission concludes that the municipality of Lemwerder acquired ASL’s land at a price that was not above the market price.
Komisija je prišla do zaključka, da občina Lemwerder ni kupila zemljišča od družbe ASL po ceni, ki presega tržno vrednost.
Accordingly, no advantage was conferred on the seller and thus no State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty was granted,
Prodajalcu se torej ni dodelila ugodnost in s tem državna pomoč v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES –
The land transaction between the municipality of Lemwerder and Aircraft Services Lemwerder does not contain any elements of State aid pursuant to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Posel z nepremičninami med občino Lemwerder in družbo Aircraft Services Lemwerder ne vsebuje elementov državnih pomoči v skladu s členom 87(1) Pogodbe ES.
Done at Brussels, 14 December 2004.
V Bruslju, dne 14. decembra 2004
OJ C 293, 3.12.2003, p. 5.
UL C 293, 3.12.2003, str. 5.
OJ L 306, 11.11.1997, p. 18.
UL L 306, 11.11.1997, str. 18.
Confidential.
Zaupno.
OJ C 209, 10.7.1997, p. 3.
UL C 209, 10.7.1997, str. 3.
For developing the ‘west’ site, the municipality received aid of EUR 562200, with 50 % co-financing under the ERDF Objective 2. It contributed from its own resources an amount of EUR 132125. The proceeds from the sale was put at EUR […].
Za komunalno ureditev zemljišča „zahod“ je občina prejela pomoč v višini 562200 EUR (50 % je sofinanciral Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj v okviru Cilja 2), iz lastnih sredstev pa je zagotovila znesek 132125 EUR. Izkupiček je znašal […] EUR.
of 19 September 2005
z dne 19. septembra 2005
amending Appendix A to Annex X to the 2003 Act of Accession as regards certain establishments in the meat sector in Hungary
o spremembi Dodatka A k Prilogi X k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 glede nekaterih obratov v sektorju mesa na Madžarskem
(notified under document number C(2005) 3450)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 3450)
Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Annex X, Chapter 5, Section B, paragraph (d) thereto,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Češke, Estonije, Cipra, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Malte, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške in zlasti odstavka (d) oddelka B poglavja 5 Priloge X k Aktu,
Annex X, Chapter 5, Section B, paragraph (a) to the 2003 Act of Accession provides that the structural requirements laid down in Annex I to Council Directive 64/433/EEC of 26 June 1964 on health conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat [1] are not to apply to establishments in Hungary listed in Appendix A [2] to Annex X to the Act of Accession until 31 December 2006, subject to certain conditions.
Odstavek (a) oddelka B poglavja 5 Priloge X k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 določa, da se strukturne zahteve iz Priloge I k Direktivi Sveta 64/433/EGS z dne 26. junija 1964 o zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in trženje svežega mesa [1] do 31. decembra 2006 pod nekaterimi pogoji ne uporabljajo za obrate na Madžarskem, ki so našteti v Dodatku A [2] k Prilogi X k Aktu o pristopu.
Appendix A to Annex X to the 2003 Act of Accession has been amended by Commission Decisions 2004/462/EC [3] and 2004/472/EC [4].
Dodatek A k Prilogi X k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 je bil spremenjen z odločbama Komisije 2004/462/ES [3] in 2004/472/ES [4].
According to an official declaration from the Hungarian competent authority, certain establishments in the meat sector have completed their upgrading process and are now in full compliance with Community legislation.
Glede na uradno izjavo madžarskega pristojnega organa so nekateri obrati v sektorju mesa zaključili postopek posodabljanja in so zdaj v celoti v usklajeni s pravnimi akti Skupnosti.
Certain establishments have ceased their activities.
Nekateri obrati so prenehali opravljati svojo dejavnost.
The status of two meat establishments and their reclassification as low capacity establishments is still under discussion with the Hungarian competent authority.
O statusu dveh obratov za meso in njuni ponovni klasifikaciji kot obrata z nizko zmogljivostjo še vedno potekajo razprave z madžarskim pristojnim organom.
It is necessary to foresee a short supplementary time in view to clarify the situation.
Treba je predvideti nekaj dodatnega časa za razjasnitev položaja.
Furthermore a limited number of establishments have made considerable efforts to comply with structural requirements laid down by Community legislation.
Poleg tega je določeno število obratov vložilo precej truda v to, da bi izpolnili strukturne zahteve iz pravnih aktov Skupnosti.
However those establishments are not in a position to finish their upgrading process by the prescribed deadline due to exceptional technical constraints.
Vendar ti obrati zaradi izjemnih tehničnih omejitev ne bodo mogli zaključiti postopka posodabljanja v predpisanemu roku.
Appendix A to Annex X to the 2003 Act of Accession should therefore be amended accordingly.
Dodatek A k Prilogi X k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Appendix A to the Annex X to the 2003 Act of Accession is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Dodatek A k Prilogi X k Aktu o pristopu iz leta 2003 se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 19 September 2005.
V Bruslju, 19. septembra 2005
OJ C 227 E, 23.9.2003, p. 444.
UL C 227 E, 23.9.2003, str. 444.
OJ L 156, 30.4.2004, p. 135; corrected version in OJ L 202, 7.6.2004, p. 92.
UL L 156, 30.4.2004, str. 135; popravljena različica v UL L 202, 7.6.2004, str. 92.
OJ L 160, 30.4.2004, p. 61; corrected version in OJ L 212, 12.6.2004, p. 34.
UL L 160, 30.4.2004, str. 61; popravljena različica v UL L 212, 12.6.2004, str. 34.
referred to in Chapter 5, Section B to Annex X [1]List of establishments, including shortcomings and deadlines for the correction of these shortcomings
iz poglavja 5 oddelka B Priloge X [1]Seznam obratov, vključno s pomanjkljivostmi in roki za njihovo odpravo
MEAT ESTABLISHMENTS
OBRATI ZA MESO
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(a) and (f)
točka 1(a) in (f) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 5, 8 and 12
točke 5, 8 in 12 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(c), (e) and (g)
točka 1(c), (e) in (g) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 3
točka 3 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(c) and (d)
točka 4(c) in (d) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 8, 11 and 12
točke 8, 11 in 12 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(a), (b), (c), (f) and (g)
točka 1(a), (b), (c), (f) in (g) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(b)
točka 4(b) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 5, 11 and 12
točke 5, 11 in 12 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(a), (c), (e) and (g)
točka 1(a), (c), (e) in (g) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(b), (c) and (e)
točka 4(b), (c) in (e) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 6, 7, 8, 11 and 12
točke 6, 7, 8, 11 in 12 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(b), (c) and (d)
točka 4(b), (c) in (d) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 9
točka 9 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(e) and (g)
točka 1(e) in (g) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(e)
točka 1(e) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(b) and (e)
točka 4(b) in (e) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 9 and 13
točki 9 in 13 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 12
točka 12 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 1(b)
točka 1(b) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(b) and (c)
točka 4(b) in (c) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 5, 9 and 11
točke 5, 9 in 11 poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 2(b)
točka 2(b) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, point 4(c) and (e)
točka 4(c) in (e) poglavja I Priloge I
Annex I, Chapter I, points 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 12
točke 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 in 12 poglavja I Priloge I
For the text of Annex X see OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 846.
Za besedilo Priloge X glej UL L 236, 23.9.2003, str. 846.
of 22 September 2005
z dne 22. septembra 2005
declaring operational the Regional Advisory Council for the North-Western Waters under the common fisheries policy
o razglasitvi začetka delovanja regionalnega svetovalnega sveta za severozahodne vode v okviru skupne ribiške politike
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/585/EC of 19 July 2004 establishing Regional Advisory Councils under the common fisheries policy [1], and in particular Article 3(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2004/585/ES z dne 19. julija 2004 o ustanovitvi regionalnih svetovalnih svetov v okviru skupne ribiške politike [1], in zlasti člena 3(3) Sklepa,
Having regard to the recommendation transmitted by Ireland on 27 June 2005 on behalf of Belgium, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom,
ob upoštevanju priporočila, ki ga je poslala Irska dne 27. junija 2005 v imenu Belgije, Francije, Irske, Nizozemske, Španije in Združenega kraljestva,
Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy [2] and Decision 2004/585/EC provide the framework for the establishment and operation of Regional Advisory Councils.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike [2] in Sklep 2004/585/ES zagotavljata okvir za ustanovitev in delovanje regionalnih svetovalnih svetov.
Article 2 of Decision 2004/585/EC establishes a Regional Advisory Council to cover the North-Western Waters in International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) areas [3] V (excluding Va and only EC waters in Vb), VI and VII.
Člen 2 Sklepa 2004/585/ES ustanavlja regionalni svetovalni svet, pristojen za severozahodne vode v območjih Mednarodnega sveta za raziskovanje morja (ICES) [3] V (razen Va in samo vode ES v Vb), VI in VII.
In accordance with Article 3(1) of Decision 2004/585/EC, representatives of the fisheries sector and other interests groups submitted a request concerning the operation of that Regional Advisory Council to Belgium, France, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom.
V skladu s členom 3(1) Sklepa 2004/585/ES so predstavniki ribiškega sektorja in drugih interesnih skupin Belgiji, Franciji, Irski, Nizozemski, Španiji in Združenemu kraljestvu predložili zahtevo glede delovanja navedenega regionalnega svetovalnega sveta.
As required by Article 3(2) of Decision 2004/585/EC, the Member States concerned determined whether the application concerning the Regional Advisory Council for the North-Western Waters was in conformity with the provisions laid down in that Decision.
Kakor določa člen 3(2) Sklepa 2004/585/ES, so zadevne države članice odločile, ali je vloga regionalnega svetovalnega sveta za severozahodne vode v skladu z določbami navedenega sklepa.
On 27 June 2005, the Member States concerned transmitted a recommendation on that Regional Advisory Council to the Commission.
Dne 27. junija 2005 so zadevne države članice poslale Komisiji priporočilo glede navedenega regionalnega svetovalnega sveta.
The Commission has evaluated the application by the interested parties and the recommendation in the light of Decision 2004/585/EC and the aims and principles of the common fisheries policy, and considers that the Regional Advisory Council for the North-Western Waters is ready to become operational,
Komisija je ocenila vlogo zainteresiranih strank in priporočilo glede na Sklep 2004/585/ES ter cilje in načela skupne ribiške politike in meni, da je regionalni svetovalni svet za severozahodne vode pripravljen na začetek delovanja –
The Regional Advisory Council for the North-Western Waters, established by Article 2(1)(d) of Decision 2004/585/EC, shall be operational as from 26 September 2005.
Regionalni svetovalni svet za severozahodne vode, ustanovljen s členom 2(1)(d) Sklepa 2004/585/ES, začne delovati s 26. septembrom 2005.
Done at Brussels, 22 September 2005.
V Bruslju, 22. septembra 2005
As defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3880/91 of 17 December 1991 on the submission of nominal catch statistics by Member States fishing in the north-east Atlantic (OJ L 365, 31.12.1991, p. 1).
Kakor je opredeljeno v Uredbi Sveta (EGS) št. 3880/91 z dne 17. decembra 1991 o predložitvi statističnih podatkov o nominalnem ulovu držav članic, ki izvajajo ribolov v severovzhodnem Atlantiku (UL L 365, 31.12.1991, str. 1).
relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement
v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 82 Pogodbe ES in člena 54 Sporazuma EGP
(Case COMP/A.39.116/B2 — Coca-Cola)
(Zadeva COMP/A.39.116/B2 – Coca-Cola)
(notified under document number C(2005) 1829)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1829)
This decision adopted pursuant to Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [1] is addressed to the Coca-Cola Company (TCCC) and its three major bottlers, Bottling Holdings (Luxembourg) SARL, Coca-Cola Erfrischungsgetränke AG and Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company SA (hereafter: the Parties).
Ta odločba, sprejeta v skladu s členom 9(1) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 [1], je naslovljena na družbo Coca-Cola („TCCC“) in njene tri glavne polnilce, Bottling Holdings (Luxembourg) sarl, Coca-Cola Erfrischungsgetränke AG in Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company SA (v nadaljnem besedilu: „stranke“).
The subject matter of the procedure relates to the conduct of TCCC and its bottlers in the supply of carbonated soft drinks in both the distribution channel for consumption at home and the channel for consumption on premise in the EC Member States, Iceland and Norway.
Predmet postopka se nanaša na ravnanje družbe Coca-Cola in njenih polnilcev pri dobavi brezalkoholnih pijač z dodanim ogljikovim dioksidom po distribucijskih poteh za potrošnjo na domu in za potrošnjo v lokalih v državah članicah ES, Islandiji in Norveški.
In a preliminary assessment, the Commission expressed concerns under Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement in relation to practices consisting in exclusivity-related requirements, growth and target rebates and leveraging of market power between various product categories.
V predhodnem ovrednotenju je Komisija izrazila pomisleke na podlagi člena 82 Pogodbe ES in člena 54 Sporazuma EGP v zvezi z ravnanji, ki zajemajo določbe o ekskluzivnosti, rabate za doseganje ciljev oziroma rasti ter uporabo tržne moči kot vzvoda med različnimi kategorijami proizvodov.
The Commission considers that the commitments offered following the preliminary assessment and the observations submitted by interested third parties are sufficient to address the identified competition concerns in channels, where the Parties reach defined market share thresholds.
Komisija meni, da zaveze, ponujene na podlagi predhodne ocene in pripomb, ki so jih predložile zainteresirane tretje stranke, zadostujejo za rešitev identificiranih konkurenčnih pomislekov na distribucijskih poteh, kjer stranke dosežejo določene pragove tržnih deležev.
In particular, the Parties will refrain from concluding exclusivity agreements save in specific circumstances and from granting growth and target rebates.
Stranke se bodo zlasti vzdržale sklepanja ekskluzivnih sporazumov, razen v posebnih okoliščinah, in rabatov za doseganje ciljev ter rasti.
In the preliminary assessment these practices were considered to make it more difficult for third parties to compete on the merits.
Predhodna ocena je za ta ravnanja presodila, da tretjim strankam otežujejo konkuriranje na podlagi tržnih prednosti.
By providing that requirements concerning assortment and shelf-space must be defined separately for certain categories of brands, the commitments address the concern identified in the preliminary assessment that strong brands could be leveraged in favour of weaker brands.
S pravilom, da morajo biti dogovori o prodajnih sortimentih in prostoru na policah za določene kategorije blagovnih znamk opredeljeni ločeno, zaveze naslavljajo pomislek iz predhodne ocene, da bi se tržna moč močnih blagovnih znamk lahko uporabljala v prid šibkejših blagovnih znamk.
In regard to financing and technical equipment, the commitments reduce contract duration, give customers the option of repayment and termination without penalties and free up a certain share of cooler space, thus addressing the concerns that the pre-existing arrangements would unduly bind customers and lead to outlet exclusivity.
Glede financiranja in tehnične opreme zaveze skrajšujejo trajanje pogodb, dajejo kupcem možnost poplačila in odstopa od pogodb brez kazni ter sproščajo določen delež prostora v hladilnikih in se tako odzivajo na pomislek, da bi obstoječa ureditev neupravičeno zavezovala kupce in privedla k ekskluzivnosti v obratih.
The decision finds that, in view of the commitments, there are no longer grounds for action by the Commission.
Ugotovi se, da ob upoštevanju zavez ni več razlogov za ukrepanje Komisije.
The decision shall be binding until 31 December 2010.
Ta odločba je zavezujoča do 31. decembra 2010.
The Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions issued a favourable opinion on 20 May 2005.
Svetovalni odbor za omejevalna ravnanja in prevladujoče položaje je dne 20. maja 2005 izdal pozitivno mnenje.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2004 (OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 411/2004 (UL L 68, 6.3.2004, str. 1).
Council Decision 2005/671/JHA
Sklep Sveta 2005/671/PNZ
of 20 September 2005
z dne 20. septembra 2005
on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences
o izmenjavi informacij in sodelovanju na področju terorističnih kaznivih dejanj
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 30(1), 31 and 34(2)(c) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti členov 29, 30(1), 31 in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe,
At its extraordinary meeting on 21 September 2001, the European Council stated that terrorism was a real challenge to the world and to Europe and that the fight against terrorism would be a priority objective of the European Union.
Na izrednem sestanku 21. septembra 2001 je Evropski svet izjavil, da je terorizem resničen izziv za svet in Evropo in da bo boj proti njemu prednostni cilj Evropske unije.
On 19 October 2001 the European Council stated that it was determined to combat terrorism in every form throughout the world and that it would continue its efforts to strengthen the coalition of the international community to combat terrorism in every shape and form, for example by increased cooperation between the operational services responsible for combating terrorism: Europol, Eurojust, the intelligence services, police forces and judicial authorities.
Evropski svet je 19. oktobra 2001 izjavil, da je odločen bojevati se proti terorizmu v kakršni koli obliki kjer koli na svetu in da bo nadaljeval s svojimi prizadevanji za okrepitev koalicije mednarodne skupnosti v boju proti terorizmu v vseh njegovih pojavnih oblikah, na primer z okrepljenim sodelovanjem med operativnimi službami, odgovornimi za boj proti terorizmu: Europol, Eurojust, obveščevalne službe, policijske službe in pravosodni organi.
It is essential in the fight against terrorism for the relevant services to have the fullest and most up-to-date information possible in their respective fields.
V boju proti terorizmu je bistvenega pomena, da imajo ustrezne službe čim bolj izčrpne in najnovejše informacije na svojem področju.
The Member States’ specialised national services, the judicial authorities and relevant bodies of the European Union such as Europol and Eurojust absolutely need information if they are to perform their tasks.
Specializiranim nacionalnim službam držav članic, pravosodnim organom in ustreznim organom Evropske unije, kot na primer Europolu in Eurojustu, so za opravljanje nalog informacije nujno potrebne.
Council Decision 2003/48/JHA of 19 December 2002 on the implementation of specific measures for police and judicial cooperation to combat terrorism in accordance with Article 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP [2] is a major step forward.
Sklep Sveta 2003/48/PNZ z dne 19. decembra 2002 o izvajanju posebnih ukrepov za policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v boju proti terorizmu v skladu s členom 4 Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP [2] predstavlja velik korak naprej.
The persistence of the terrorist threat and the complexity of the phenomenon raise the need for ever greater exchanges of information.
Spričo trdovratnosti teroristične grožnje in zapletenosti tega pojava je potreba po izmenjavi informacij vedno večja.
The scope of information exchanges must be extended to all stages of criminal proceedings, including convictions, and to all persons, groups or entities investigated, prosecuted or convicted for terrorist offences.
To izmenjavo informacij je treba razširiti na vse faze kazenskega postopka, vključno z obsodbami, ter na vse osebe, skupine ali organizacije, ki so predmet preiskave, se kazensko preganjajo ali so bile obsojene zaradi terorističnih kaznivih dejanj.
Since the objectives of this decision cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting alone and can therefore, given the need for reciprocity, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, act in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Ker ciljev tega sklepa države članice same ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker te cilje zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa laže doseže Skupnost, Skupnost lahko sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.