natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such specific provision for an ex post monitoring on the compatibility of aid amounts, which are unusual and exceptional, became operational via the spillover reports, which not only ensured that no other enterprises such as KWW would benefit from the aid but also provided for specific reporting on aid amounts received by Kvaerner and its losses from certain shipbuilding contracts, for which compensation by State aid was authorised.
Ta poseben pogoj ex post nadzornega mehanizma za združljivost subvencij – ki je nenavaden in izreden – se je uresničil s „spillover“ poročili. Ta so zagotovila, da nobeno drugo podjetje, razen KWW, ni prejelo subvencij, in so poleg tega zajemala poročanje družbe Kvaerner o prejetih izplačilih subvencij in tudi njegove izgube iz določenih ladjedelniških pogodb, za katere so bile subvencije izplačane kot kompenzacija.
Since the authorising decisions made clear that only the aid necessary for restructuring would constitute compatible aid and that a specific monitoring was established to control the development of losses from shipbuilding contracts, the beneficiary cannot claim that it had legitimate expectations to keep any excess aid.
Ker je bilo v odločbi o odobritvi jasno povedano, da so združljive samo tiste subvencije, ki so bile potrebne za prestrukturiranje, in da je bil vzpostavljen poseben mehanizem nadzora, ki bi nadziral gibanje izgub iz ladjedelniških pogodb, prejemnik subvencij ne more uveljavljati varstva zaupanja.
The Commission never communicated that, despite the wording of the decisions, its undertakings to the Council and the specific monitoring that was carried out, aid for loss compensation could be considered as a lump sum.
Komisija nikoli ni sporočila, da – v nasprotju z besedilom odločbe, z njeno obveznostjo do Sveta in posebnimi mehanizmi nadzora – se lahko subvencije za kompenzacijo izgub obravnavajo kot pavšalna vsota.
KWW was aware that for such large aid amounts which were based on rough cost estimations and calculated at short notice, a lump sum system could not be in line with strict State aid control.
KWW je vedel, da za tako obsežno subvencijsko vsoto, ki je temeljila na približnih ocenah in bila izračunana v kratkem roku, pavšalni znesek ne bi bil združljiv s pravili rednega nadzora nad pomočmi.
The Commission finds that EUR 13293077 (DEM 25999000) operating aid granted by Germany to KWW did not comply with the provision of the Commission decisions communicated to Germany by letters of 3 March 1993 and 17 January 1994, according to which the yards in the new Länder shall only receive the aid necessary for their restructuring.
Komisija zato meni, da 13293077 EUR (25999000 DEM) subvencij za tekoče poslovanje, ki jih je Nemčija odobrila KWW, ni združljivih s predpisom odločb Komisije, ki jih je ta vročila Nemčiji z dopisom z dne 3. marca 1993 oz. 17. januarja 1994, po katerih lahko ladjedelnice v novih državah prejmejo samo toliko subvencij, kolikor jih potrebujejo za svoje prestrukturiranje.
Since only the aid that complies with the Commission decisions taken in accordance with Directive 90/684/EEC can be considered compatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(3)(e) of the EC Treaty, the Commission concludes that EUR 13293077 (DEM 25999000) aid is incompatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.
Ker se lahko v skladu s členom 87(3)(e) Pogodbe ES kot združljive s skupnim trgom obravnavajo samo tiste subvencije, ki so v skladu z odločbami Komisije, sprejetimi na temelju Direktive 90/684/EGS, Komisija ugotavlja, da prejete subvencije v višini 13293077 EUR (25999000 DEM) po členu 87(1) Pogodbe ES niso združljive s skupnim trgom.
According to article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 concerning negative decisions in cases of unlawful aid, the Commission decides that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary.
Po členu 14(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 odloči Komisija pri negativnih odločitvah, da mora zadevna država sprejeti vse nujne ukrepe, da bi od prejemnika terjala vračilo protipravnih subvencij.
The aid to be recovered shall include interest from the date on which it was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery,
Subvencije, katerih vračilo je treba terjati, zajemajo tudi obresti od trenutka, ko je imel prejemnik protipravne subvencije na voljo, do njihovega dejanskega vračila –
State aid granted by Germany for the benefit of Kvaerner Warnow Werft GmbH amounting to EUR 13293077 (DEM 25999000) is incompatible with the common market.
Ukrep državne pomoči Nemčije v korist Kvaerner Warnow Werft GmbH v višini 13293077 EUR (25999000 DEM) je nezdružljiv s skupnim trgom.
Germany shall take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiary the aid referred to in Article 1, which was unlawfully available to the beneficiary.
Nemčija sprejme vse nujne ukrepe, s katerimi od prejemnika terja vračilo pomoči, ki so navedene v členu 1 in ki so bile dane na voljo protipravno.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures of national law provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of this decision.
Terjanje vračila subvencij poteka po državnih postopkih, če ti omogočajo takojšnjo izvedbo te odločbe.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest throughout the period running from the date on which they were first put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Na zneske, katerih vračilo je treba terjati, je treba zaračunati tudi obresti od trenutka, ko je imel prejemnik protipravne pomoči prvič na voljo, do njihovega dejanskega vračila.
The interest rate to be applied will be the reference rate used for calculating the grant equivalent of regional aid and that is applicable on the date on which the aid was first put at the disposal of the beneficiary.
Obresti se izračunajo z referenčno obrestno mero, veljavno za izračun ekvivalenta subvencije regionalnih pomoči na dan prve razpoložljivosti subvencije.
The interest rate referred to in paragraph 4 will be applied on a compound basis throughout the entire period referred to in paragraph 3.
Obrestno mero po odstavku 4 je treba izračunati za celotno obdobje iz odstavka 3 po obrestnoobrestni formuli.
However, if more than five years have elapsed between the date on which the aid was first put at the disposal of the beneficiary and the date of recovery, the interest rate shall be recalculated at five yearly intervals, taking as a basis the reference rate in force at the time when the rate is recalculated.
Če je od trenutka prve razpoložljivosti subvencije in trenutka terjanja vračila preteklo več kot pet let, se obrestna mera v petletnem obdobju izračuna na novo, pri čemer bo podlaga obrestna mera, veljavna v trenutku novega izračuna.
Germany shall inform the Commission, within two months of notification of this decision, of the measures planned and already taken to comply with it.
Nemčija v dveh mesecih po vročitvi te odločbe sporoči Komisiji, kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti oz. so načrtovani za izpolnitev obstoječe odločbe.
This information must include the information required by the form attached in the Annex.
Sem spada tudi sporočanje informacij, zahtevanih v formularju, priloženem kot priloga.
OJ L 380, 31.12.1990, p. 27.
UL L 380, 31.12.1990, str. 27.
Directive as last amended by Directive 94/73/EC (OJ L 351, 31.12.1994, p. 10).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 94/73/ES (UL L 351, 31.12.1994, str. 10).
OJ L 219, 4.8.1992, p. 54.
UL L 219, 4.8.1992, str. 54.
OJ C 134, 13.5.2000, p. 5.
UL C 134, 13.5.2000, str. 5.
Amounts in EUR are indicative and rounded.
Zneski v eurih so zaokroženi navzgor oz. navzdol.
Only figures in DEM represent exact amounts.
Natančni zneski so v nemških markah.
See footnote 3.
Glej opombo 3
The second sentence in the fourth paragraph of the latter decision reads as follows: ‘However, the Commission can, in the light of the undertaking to the Council described above, only approve the granting of aid for as far as the necessity is clearly shown and the conditions laid down in the Council Directive as counterpart for the aid are being closely adhered to.’
V drugem stavku četrtega odstavka zadnje imenovane odločbe se glasi: „Vendar pa lahko Komisija v skladu s prevzeto obveznostjo do Sveta odobri dodelitev subvencije samo, če se dokaže njena nujnost in če so v zameno strogo izpolnjeni pogoji za subvencije, navedeni v direktivi Sveta.“
Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-3871, paragraph 74.
Zadeva T-296/97 Alitalia proti Komisiji, (2000), PSES, str. II-3871, odstavek 74.
Falck SpA and Acciaierie di Bolzano SpA v Commission [2002] ECR I-7869, paragraph 140, referring to Case 59/62 Geigy v Commission [1972] ECR 787, paragraph 21.
Falck SpA in Acciaierie di Bolzano SpA proti Komisiji (2002), PSES str. I-7869, odstavek 140, ki napoti na zadevo. 59/62, Geigy proti Komisiji, (1972), PSES str. 787, odstavek 21.
Commission v Kvaerner Warnow Werft (not yet published in the ECR).
Komisija proti Kvaerner Warnow Werft, še ni objavljeno.
Information regarding the implementation of Commission Decision 2005/374/EC
Informacije glede izvedbe Odločbe Komisije 2005/374/ES
Calculation of the amount to be recovered
Izračun vsote, ki jo je treba terjati
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful State aid that has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary:
Navedite naslednje podrobnosti o višini vsote protipravne pomoči, podeljene prejemniku ugodnosti:
Date(s) of payment [1]
Datum plačila [1]
Amount of aid [2]
Višina pomoči [2]
Identity of beneficiary
Identiteta prejemnika ugodnosti
Please explain in detail how the interest to be paid on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated?
Prosimo, natančno pojasnite, kako bodo izračunane obresti, ki jih je treba plačati na pomoči, katerih vračilo se terja.
Measures planned and already taken to recover the aid
Že sprejeti ali načrtovani ukrepi za terjanje vračila pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures have already been taken and what measures are planned to effect an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Natančno opišite, kateri ukrepi so že bili sprejeti in kateri ukrepi so načrtovani za izvedbo neposredne in učinkovite izterjave vračila pomoči.
Please also explain what alternative measures are available under national law to effect recovery?
Pojasnite tudi, kateri alternativni ukrepi za izterjavo vračila so v nacionalnem pravu.
Please also indicate where relevant the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Sporočite, če obstaja, pravno podlago za sprejete/načrtovane ukrepe.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Do katerega datuma bo opravljena izterjava vračila pomoči?
Recovery already effected
Že izterjana vračila
Please provide the following details on the amounts of aid that have been recovered from the beneficiary:
Navedite naslednje podrobnosti o pomoči, katere vračilo je že bilo izterjano od prejemnika ugodnosti:
Amount of aid repaid
Vrnjen znesek
Identify of beneficiary
Identiteta prejemnika ugodnosti
Please attach information documenting the repayment of the aid amounts specified in the table under point 3.1 above.
Predložite dokazila o povračilu zneskov pomoči, določenih v tabeli v točki 3.1.
Date(s) on which (individual instalments of) the aid has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in so far as a measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements use separate rows).
Datum, na katerega je bila podeljena pomoč ali posamezni obroki pomoči prejemniku ugodnosti (če je ukrep sestavljen iz večjega števila obrokov in plačil, je treba uporabiti ločene vrstice).
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in gross aid equivalents).
Višina pomoči, podeljene prejemniku ugodnosti (v bruto ekvivalentih pomoči).
Date(s) on which the aid has been repaid.
Datum, na katerega je bila pomoč vrnjena.
Germany refers to the Commission decision releasing the second tranche of aid, which stipulates that the authorised amount is the highest operating aid that can be paid to the yard. This would only mean that the yard should not receive any other operating aid than that provided for in the privatisation contract, in particular no additional aid under the approved schemes.
Po mnenju Nemčije bi lahko izjava v odločbi Komisije o odobritvi drugega obroka, po kateri je odobrena vsota najvišji znesek subvencije za tekoče poslovanje, ki se ga sme izplačati ladjedelnici, pomenila samo, da ladjedelnica ne sme prejeti nobenih subvencij za tekoče poslovanje, ki presegajo mejo, predvideno v pogodbi o privatizaciji, predvsem pa nobenih dodatnih subvencij na osnovi potrjenih določb o pomoči.
Germany explained the difference between the actual losses in the 1995 report and the report submitted later by Arthur Andersen to Germany by letter of 25 July 1997 concerning the situation at 31 December 1996. They are due to the fact that the risk estimations were not fully realised and that the situation proved to be different in 1996 due to the time factor.
Nemčija utemeljuje razliko med dejanskimi izgubami v poročilu za leto 1995 in poročilom o stanju na dan 31. decembra 1996, ki ga je predložila revizijska družba Arthur Andersen 25. julija 1997, s tem, da se ocene tveganja niso uresničile v celotnem obsegu in da se je situacija leta 1996 zaradi časovnega dejavnika spremenila.
As explained in the opening decision of the Commission, the German press reported on 12 June 1999 that Kvaerner Warnow Werft had given a loan of around DEM 400 million to its parent company Kvaerner a.s.
Kot je bilo izpeljano že v sklepu o uvedbi postopka, je nemški tisk 12. junija 1999 poročal, da je družba Kvaerner Warnow Werft svoji matični družbi Kvaerner a. s. odobrila posojilo okoli 400 milijonov DEM.
With a letter dated 16 June 1999 the Commission requested detailed information from Germany of the origin of the transferred funds in order to ensure that these funds did not contain residues of restructuring aid paid to the company in 1993 to 1995, or any other aid elements.
Komisija je z dopisom z dne 16. junija 1999 prosila za temeljite podatke o izvoru teh sredstev, s čimer se je želela prepričati, da ta sredstva ne izhajajo iz preostanka subvencij, ki jih je podjetje prejemalo med letoma 1993 in 1995, oziroma da ne vsebujejo drugih elementov subvencij.
The Commission requested additional information from Germany by letters dated 23 June 1999, 12 July 1999 and 8 October 1999. Germany replied by letters of 30 June 1999 and 16 September 1999.
Z dopisi 23. junija 1999, 12. julija 1999 in 8. oktobra 1999 je Komisija zaprosila Nemčijo za dodatne podatke ter v odgovor prejela dopise z dne 30. junija 1993 in 16. septembra 1999.
It is noted that the individual points raised by KWW in its comments are in majority identical to the points raised by Germany in its comments. The points are therefore only listed briefly below.
Naj že vnaprej omenimo, da so argumenti družbe KWW večinoma enaki z navedenimi argumenti zvezne vlade, zato je v nadaljevanju zapisan le njihov kratek povzetek.
(…) Once the time limit referred to in paragraph 6 has expired, and should the Member State concerned so request, the Commission shall, within two months, take a decision on the basis of the information available to it.’ The Commission states that Germany did not ask for the application of this provision.
Če rok po odstavku 6 poteče, bo Komisija na željo zadevne države članice v roku dveh mesecev na podlagi njej razpoložljivih informacij sprejela odločitev.“ Komisija ugotavlja, da Nemčija ni zaprosila za uporabo te določbe.
The fact that part of the aid was paid non-cash is made clear in the Commission decision communicated to Germany on 17 January 1994, which releases the second tranche of operating aid and which reads as follows: ‘… 617,1 m DEM operating aid of which 113.5 m DEM would be paid in cash being 66.9 m DEM Wettbewerbshilfe and 46.6 m DEM to cover a part of the losses on contracts signed after 1.7.1990 ….’ This indicates that most part of the operating aid approved by this decision, namely the amount of EUR 257,4 million (DEM 503,6 million), was approved as non-cash aid.
Da del subvencije ne pomeni subvencije v gotovini, je jasno izraženo v odločbi Komisije, ki jo je ta vročila zvezni vladi 17. januarja 1994: „… 617,1 milijona DEM subvencij za tekoče poslovanje, od česar je bilo 113,5 milijona DEM plačanega v gotovini, od tega 66,9 milijona DEM subvencije za konkurenčnost in 46,6 milijona DEM za pokritje dela izgub iz pogodb, podpisanih po 1. juliju 1990 …“ Iz tega sledi, da je bil največji del subvencij za tekoče poslovanje, ki jih je odobrila Komisija s to odločbo, namreč 257,4 milijona EUR (503,6 milijona DEM), odobren kot „non-cash“ pomoč.
The Commission received comments dated 9 June 2000 and 13 June 2000 from the Association of Danish Shipbuilders (Foreningen av Jernskibs- og Maskinbyggerier i Danmark — Skibsvaerftsforeningen). It received further comments from the Confederation of Danish Industry (Dansk Industri) dated 9 June 2000 and 28 June 2000.
Dne 9. junija 2000 in 13. junija 2000 je Združenje danskih ladjedelnic (Foreningen av Jernskibs- og Maskinbyggerier i Danmark - Skibsvaerftsforeningen) poslalo svoje pripombe Komisiji 9. junija 2000 in 28. junija 2000 je potem prejela še mnenje Združenja danske industrije (Dansk Industri).
The Commission also noted that in all of its decisions granting the aid it was clearly stated that the Commission shall use its investigating and monitoring powers to ensure that the yards only receive the aid necessary for their restructuring. Consequently, since according to the Commission decisions approving the aid the yards shall only receive the aid necessary for their restructuring, and the Commission had committed itself to monitor the compliance of this provision, only the compensation of actual losses can be considered as being compatible with the Commission decisions granting the aid.
Komisija je prav tako ugotovila, da je v vseh svojih odločbah o odobritvi izrecno opozorila na to, da bo v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi nadzora in preverjanja poskrbela, da bodo ladjedelnice prejemale samo pomoči, potrebne za njihovo prestrukturiranje.
of 11 May 2005
z dne 11. maja 2005
amending Decision 90/255/EEC as regards the entry of male sheep and goats into an annex to the flock-book
o spremembi Odločbe 90/255/EGS glede vpisa ovc moškega spola in koz v prilogo k rodovniški knjigi
(notified under document number C(2005) 1409)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1409)
Having regard to Council Directive 89/361/EEC of 30 May 1989 concerning pure-bred breeding sheep and goats [1], and in particular the second indent of Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 89/361/EGS z dne 30. maja 1989 v zvezi s čistopasemskimi plemenskimi ovcami in kozami [1] in zlasti drugo alineo člena 4 Direktive,
Commission Decision 90/255/EEC of 10 May 1990 laying down the criteria governing entry in flock-books for pure-bred breeding sheep and goats [2], provides that breeders’ associations and organisations may decide to enter males of certain breeds, which are specified in a closed list, in an annex to the flock-book.
Odločba Komisije 90/255/EGS z dne 10. maja 1990 o določitvi pogojev za vpis čistopasemskih plemenskih ovc in koz v rodovniške knjige [2] določa, da se rejska združenja in organizacije lahko odločijo za vpis živali moškega spola določenih pasem, ki so naštete v zaprtem seznamu, v prilogo rodovniške knjige.
That list has been found to be impractical and inflexible and should be replaced by a flexible procedure under which breeding organisations can opt for the use of the necessary genetic resources within the framework of a clear defined and supervised breeding programme.
Izkazalo se je, da je navedeni seznam nepraktičen ter neprilagodljiv in da ga je treba nadomestiti s prilagodljivim postopkom, po katerem se lahko organizacije za gojenje odločijo za uporabo potrebnih genskih virov v okviru jasno določenega in nadzorovanega programa za rejo.
It is in the interest of protection of animal genetic resources to allow approved breeders’ organisations or associations to establish, in appropriate cases, annexes to their flock-books for males which do not fulfil the criteria for entry in the main section but are valuable for the preservation of the breed.
V interesu zaščite živalskih genskih virov je dovoliti odobrenim rejskim organizacijam ali združenjem, da v ustreznih primerih uvedejo priloge k rodovniškim knjigam za živali moškega spola, ki ne izpolnjujejo meril za vpis v glavni del, vendar so koristni za ohranitev pasme.
The rules on entering certain males into an annex to the flock-book and allowing progeny of such males to enter the main section of the flock-book should be sufficiently stringent and non-discriminatory; to this end, they should be submitted for prior approval to the competent authority referred to in Commission Decision 90/254/EEC of 10 May 1990 laying down the criteria for approval of breeders’ organisations and associations which establish or maintain flock-books for pure-bred breeding sheep and goats [3].
Pravila o vpisu določenih živali moškega spola v prilogo k rodovniški knjigi in dovoljenje za vpis potomcev teh živali moškega spola v glavni del rodovniške knjige morajo biti dovolj stroga in nediskriminacijska; zato morajo biti predložena v predhodno odobritev pristojnemu organu iz Odločbe Komisije 90/254/EGS z dne 10. maja 1990 o določitvi pogojev za priznanje rejskih organizacij in združenj, ki vzpostavljajo ali vodijo rodovniške knjige za čistopasemske plemenske ovce in koze [3].
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Zootechnics,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za zootehniko –
The Annex to Decision 90/255/EEC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga k Odločbi 90/255/EGS se nadomesti z besedilom v Prilogi k tej odločbi.
Done at Brussels, 11 May 2005.
V Bruslju, 11. maja 2005
OJ L 153, 6.6.1989, p. 30.
UL L 153, 6.6.1989, str. 30.
OJ L 145, 8.6.1990, p. 32.
UL L 145, 8.6.1990, str. 32.
OJ L 145, 8.6.1990, p. 30.
UL L 145, 8.6.1990, str. 30.
Conditions provided for in the fourth indent of Article 4
Pogoji, predvideni v četrti alinei člena 4
The flock-book must refer to a “hardy” breed which is not normally intended for intensive production.
Rodovniška knjiga se mora sklicevati na ‚težko’ pasmo, ki običajno ni namenjena intenzivni proizvodnji.
The breeder’s association or organisation must have demonstrated the lack of males registered in the main section of the flock-book and available for breeding in accordance with the breeding programme.
Rejsko združenje ali organizacija je morala izkazati pomanjkanje živali moškega spola v glavnem delu rodovniške knjige, ki so dostopne za rejo v skladu s programom za rejo.
The breeder’s association or organisation must have justified the necessity for an Annex to the flock-book for males in the context of the breeding programme.
Rejsko združenje ali organizacija je morala upravičiti potrebo po prilogi k rodovniški knjigi za živali moškega spola v okviru programa za rejo.
The conditions under which progeny of males entered in an Annex to the flock-book may enter the main section of the flock-book, must be laid down and be at least as stringent as those applicable to the respective females.
Pogoji, pod katerimi se potomec živali moškega spola, vpisan v prilogo k rodovniški knjigi, lahko zapiše v glavni del rodovniške knjige, morajo biti določeni in najmanj tako strogi kot tisti, ki veljajo za živali ženskega spola.
To this end, the breeders’ association or organisation shall obtain the prior approval of those conditions by the competent authority approving that organisation in accordance with Commission Decision 90/254/EEC.’
Zato pridobi rejsko združenje ali organizacija predhodno odobritev navedenih pogojev pri pristojnem organu, ki odobri navedeno organizacijo v skladu z Odločbo Komisije 90/254/EGS.“
Decision No 201
Sklep št. 201
on model forms necessary for the application of Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 and (EEC) No 574/72 (E 400 series)
o vzorčnih obrazcih za uporabo uredb Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 in (EGS) št. 574/72 (serija E 400)