natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the products referred to in Article 1 that are found to contain Bt10 maize or feed produced from Bt10 maize are not placed on the market.
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se izdelki, iz člena 1, za katere se ugotovi, da vsebujejo koruzo „Bt10“ ali krmo, izdelano iz koruze „Bt10“, ne dajo v promet.
Recovery of costs
Povračilo stroškov
Member States shall ensure that the costs incurred in the implementation of Articles 2 and 4 are borne by the operators responsible for the first placing on the market.
Države članice zagotovijo, da stroške, nastale zaradi izvajanja členov 2 in 4, pokrijejo nosilci dejavnosti, odgovorni za prvo dajanje proizvodov v promet.
Review of the measure
Pregled ukrepov
This Decision shall be reviewed by 31 October 2005 at the latest.
Odločba se ponovno pregleda najpozneje 31. oktobra 2005.
Statement of the European Food Safety Authority issued on 12 April 2005.
Izjava Evropske agencije za varnost hrane z dne 12. aprila 2005.
on the aid scheme which Italy is planning to implement to assist farmers in the province of Campobasso
o režimu pomoči, s katero namerava Italija pomagati kmetovalcem iz pokrajine Campobasso
(notified under document number C(2004) 1634)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 1634)
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision cited above,
po pozivu zadevnim strankam, da podajo pripombe skladno z navedenim členom,
By letter dated 29 November 2000, recorded as received on 30 November 2000, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission, in accordance with Article 88(3) of the Treaty, of Decision No 629 of 29 December 1999 of the Campobasso Provincial Executive.
V pismu z dne 29. novembra 2000, prejetim dne 30. novembra 2000, je stalno predstavništvo Italije v Evropski skupnosti obvestilo Komisijo, skladno s členom 88(3) Pogodbe, o Odločbi št. 629 Pokrajinskega odbora iz Campobassa z dne 29. decembra 1999.
By letters dated 8 February, 21 February, 12 June and 11 September 2001, recorded as received on 12 February, 28 February, 14 June and 13 September 2001 respectively, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union provided the Commission with additional information it had requested in its letters of 12 January, 26 April and 7 August 2001.
V pismu z dne 8. februarja 2001, prejetim 12. februarja 2001, z dne 21. februarja 2001, prejetim 28. februarja 2001, z dne 12. junija 2001, prejetim 14. junija 2001 in z dne 11. septembra 2001, prejetim 13. septembra 2001, je stalno predstavništvo Italije v Evropski skupnosti posredovalo Komisiji dopolnilne informacije, ki jih je ta zahtevala pri italijanskih organih v pismih z dne 12. januarja 2001, z dne 26. aprila 2001 in z dne 7. avgusta 2001.
By letter dated 13 November 2001 the Commission informed Italy that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the Treaty in respect of the aid.
V pismu z dne 13. novembra 2001 je Komisija obvestila Italijo o svoji odločitvi, da začne postopek iz člena 88(2) Pogodbe v zvezi s tovrstno pomočjo.
The Commission Decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [1].
Sklep Komisije, da začne postopek, je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [1].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments on the measure in question.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane, da predložijo pripombe o zadevnem ukrepu.
The Italian authorities did not submit any comments on the measure.
Italijanski organi niso podali nobene pripombe o zadevnih ukrepih.
The Commission has received no comment from other interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb zainteresiranih strani.
The aid scheme
Shema pomoči
The Decision of the Provincial Executive provides for the granting of aid in the form of subsidised loans of up to ITL 20 million (EUR 10329) at a rate of 2 % for:
Zadevna odločba načrtuje pomoč v obliki ugodnih posojil po 2 % obrestni meri za največ 20 milijonov ITL (10329 EUR) za:
adapting farms to health and hygiene standards in accordance with Decree No 54 of 14 January 1997 adopting the Regulation transposing Directives 92/46/EEC and 92/47/EEC on the production and placing on the market of milk and milk products,
usklajevanje zootehničnih podjetij z zdravstvenimi in higienskimi standardi, skladno z določili Dekreta št. 54 z dne 14. januarja 1997, ki uvaja predpise o izvajanju direktiv 92/46/EGS in 92/47/EGS v zvezi s proizvodnjo in plasiranjem mleka in proizvodov na osnovi mleka na trg,
improving health and safety in the workplace in accordance with Legislative Decree No 626 of 19 September 1994, and subsequent amendments thereto, transposing Directives 89/391/EEC, 89/654/EEC, 89/655/EEC, 89/656/EEC, 90/269/EEC, 90/270/EEC, 90/394/EEC, 90/679/EEC, 93/88/EEC, 97/42/EC and 1999/38/EC on improving health and safety at work,
izboljševanje varnosti in zdravja na delovnem mestu, skladno z določili Zakonskega dekreta št. 626 z dne 19. septembra 1994, in kasnejših sprememb za uporabo direktiv 89/391/EGS, 89/654/EGS, 89/655/EGS, 89/656/EGS, 90/269/EGS, 90/270/EGS, 90/394/EGS, 90/679/EGS, 93/88/EGS, 97/42/ES in 1999/38/ES o povečevanju in izboljševanju varnosti in zdravja delavcev na delovnem mestu,
adapting food production control standards in accordance with Decree No 155 of 26 May 1997 transposing Directives 93/43/EEC and 96/3/EC on the hygiene of foodstuffs.
usklajevanju s standardi o nadzoru proizvodnje živil, skladno z določili Dekreta št. 155 z dne 26. maja 1997, o izvajanju direktiv 93/43/EGS in 96/3/ES, ki zadevajo higieno živilskih proizvodov.
By way of indication, the aid scheme covers the following in particular:
Še zlasti spadajo v shemo pomoči:
work on building and/or adapting facilities for the treatment of liquid waste,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje objektov za predelavo gnojnice,
work on building and/or adapting milk-collection and storage facilities,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje objektov za zbiranje in konzerviranje mleka,
work on building and/or adapting small-scale electrical installations,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje električnih instalacij,
work on building and/or adapting sanitation facilities,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje higiensko-sanitarnih naprav,
work on building and/or adapting livestock housing,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje objektov za nastanitev živali,
work on building and/or adapting food-collection and storage facilities,
dela za izgradnjo in/ali prilagajanje objektov za zbiranje in konzerviranje poljskih pridelkov,
the use of building materials that lend themselves to better hygiene.
zamenjava nehigienskega konstrukcijskega materiala z drugim, ki ima boljše higienske značilnosti.
Aid under the above headings includes planning and construction, the purchase of materials and ‘other costs’ (covered by ‘etc.’ in the notification).
V okviru navedenih postavk bo pomoč pokrivala stroške projektiranja in izgradnje, nakup materiala in „ostale stroške“ (ki so v obvestilu označeni z izrazom „itd.“).
The maximum aid intensities are as specified in Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 [2].
Najvišjo intenzivnost pomoči določa člen 7 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/1999 [2].
The recipients of the aid are owner farmers, farmers practising farming as their main occupation, and groups thereof, registered with the Campobasso Chamber of Commerce.
Upravičenci do pomoči so samostojni kmetje ter tisti samostojni ali združeni kmetovalci, ki so člani Gospodarske zbornice v Campobassu.
ITL 150 million (EUR 77468) has been earmarked for funding the scheme.
Za financiranje pomoči je dodeljeno 150 milijonov ITL (77468 EUR).
The latter is set to last until the funds concerned have been used up.
Režim pomoči bo trajal do izrabe dodeljenih sredstev.
The aid provided for in the Decision of the Provincial Executive may not be combined with other aid having the same purpose.
Pomoč po odločbi se ne sešteva s pomočjo iz drugih virov, ki so predvideni za isti namen.
In this connection, recipients must sign a declaration to the effect that they will not apply for other aid for the same purpose.
Zato bo moral upravičenec podpisati izjavo o odgovornosti, s katero se bo zavezal, da ne bo zahteval druge pomoči za isto zadevo.
Regular checks are to be carried out in this respect.
Izjave bodo redno preverjali.
Grounds on which proceedings were initiated by the Commission
Dokazi, ki jih navaja Komisija v postopku preverjanja
The Commission initiated proceedings under Article 88(2) of the Treaty because it had doubts as to whether the scheme was compatible with the common market.
Komisija je začela postopek skladno s členom 88(2) Pogodbe, ker je imela pomisleke o združljivosti režima s skupnim trgom.
Those doubts were as follows.
Šlo je za naslednje pomisleke.
Doubts regarding the types of investment eligible for aid
Pomisleki o naravi investicij, ki so predmet pomoči
As part of the information they provided before proceedings were initiated, the Italian authorities stated that the maximum authorised aid intensity levels were those applicable under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, in other words those specified, for investment in agricultural holdings, at 4.1 of the Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector [3] (hereinafter the Guidelines).
V informacijah, ki so bile posredovane pred začetkom postopka, so italijanski organi natanko opredelili, da določa najvišjo dopustno pomoč člen 7 Uredbe (ES) št. 1257/1999, ki ustreza tisti, ki je določena v točki 4.1 usmeritev Skupnosti v zvezi s pomočjo kmetijskemu sektorju [3] (v nadaljevanju usmeritve), kar zadeva vlaganja v kmetijska podjetja.
The Italian authorities also referred to Measure 4.9 under the Regional Operational Programme, which covers only investment in agricultural holdings.
Poleg tega so se v informacijah povrnili na ukrep 4.9 regionalnega operativnega programa, ki zadeva izključno vlaganja v kmetijska podjetja.
In the light of that information and the above-mentioned reference, the aid rates applicable would be 50 % in less-favoured areas and 40 % elsewhere, plus, in both cases, an additional five percentage points if the investment is made by young farmers.
Ob upoštevanju gornjih navedb in opozorila na ukrep, bi uporabili naslednje stopnje pomoči: 40 % za območja brez omejenih možnosti in 50 % za območja z omejenimi možnostmi, s povečanjem za 5 odstotnih točk v obeh primerih ob vlaganju mladih kmetovalcev.
The aid could conceivably be covered by three points of the Guidelines:
Pomoč iz obravnavanega primera bi lahko uporabili v treh točkah usmeritev:
4.1, on investment in agricultural holdings;
točka 4.1, ki zadeva vlaganja v kmetijska podjetja,
4.2, on investment in connection with the processing and marketing of agricultural products (the application of this point cannot be ruled out because, according to the information transmitted by the Italian authorities, the recipients are owner farmers (‘coltivatori diretti’) and farmers generally (‘imprenditori agricoli’); according to Article 2135 of Italy’s Civil Code, ‘imprenditori agricoli are persons who carry on activities aimed at cultivation of the soil, silviculture, livestock farming and related activities’, and the latter could include the processing and marketing of agricultural products);
točka 4.2, ki zadeva vlaganja v sektor predelave in pospeševanja prodaje kmetijskih proizvodov (uporabe določil te točke ni moč izključiti, saj so upravičenci do pomoči, ki jim informacije posredujejo italijanski organi, neposredni kmetovalci in kmetijski posestniki; po členu 2135 italijanskega Civilnega zakonika „je kmetijski posestnik oseba, ki se neposredno ukvarja z obdelavo zemlje, gozdnim gospodarjenjem, vzrejo živali in sorodnimi dejavnostmi“, in prav slednje bi lahko vključevalo predelavo in trženje kmetijskih pridelkov),
4.3, on the diversification of farm activities, which refers back to 4.1 and 4.2.
točka 4.3, ki zadeva diverzifikacijo kmetijskih dejavnosti in napoti ponovno na točki 4.1 in 4.2.
In its letter of 7 August 2001, the Commission department concerned invited the Italian authorities to describe in detail how each of these points had been complied with for each type of recipient.
V pismu z dne 7. avgusta 2001 so službe Komisije pozvale italijanske organe, da podajo natančne dokaze o spoštovanju določil vsake posamezne točke glede na vrsto obravnavanega upravičenca.
In their letter of 11 September 2001 the Italian authorities replied only that Community rules and provisions would not be overlooked and that, to ensure greater compliance, the Region would follow the same approach as for the management of EAGGF Guidance funds.
V pismu z dne 11. septembra 2001 so se italijanski organi v odgovoru omejili na zagotovitev, da določil Skupnosti ne bodo ignorirali in da bo regija, zaradi večjega upoštevanja določil, predpisala njihovo uporabo, ki bo enaka tisti za vodenje skladov EKUJS-usmeritev.
Taking account of that reply the Commission verified whether the above-mentioned points of the Guidelines were effectively being complied with.
Upoštevaje takšen odgovor, se je Komisija vprašala o dejanskem spoštovanju navedenih točk iz usmeritev.
Doubts regarding the nature and rate of financing of certain types of eligible expenditure
Pomisleki o naravi in stopnji financiranja nekaterih sprejemljivih stroškov
While on the one hand it could be assumed that the rates of aid would be complied with irrespective of which point of the Guidelines was applicable, since in the case of measures for the processing/marketing of agricultural products, Molise is among the Objective 1 regions and thus qualifies for an aid rate of 50 %, i.e. a figure which is not below the maximum indicated by the Italian authorities in their initial notification, on the other, the percentage of eligible expenditure represented by planning costs was not specified, whereas under the Guidelines it is limited to 12 % of the other items of eligible expenditure.
Če se lahko po eni strani predpostavlja, da bo stopnja pomoči upoštevana neodvisno od zadevne točke usmeritev, saj se skladno z ukrepi, ki zadevajo predelavo in trženje kmetijskih proizvodov, Molise uvršča med regije v okviru cilja 1 in lahko zato prejme pomoč v višini 50 %, kar ne presega najvišje stopnje pomoči, ki so jo predvideli italijanski organi v prvotnem obvestilu, pa po drugi strani odstotek sprejemljivih stroškov, ki jih predstavljajo stroški projektiranja, ni bil opredeljen, v usmeritvah pa je omejen na 12 % ostalih sprejemljivih postavk.
When proceedings were initiated it was not possible to determine the nature of certain costs covered by the term ‘etc.’ in the notification.
V začetku je bilo nemogoče določiti naravo nekaterih stroškov, ki so v obvestilu označeni z izrazom „itd.“.
There was thus a possibility that some of the expenditure in that category might not be eligible and that the aid concerned might constitute operating aid incompatible with the common market.
Torej ni bilo možno izključiti, da bi bili nekateri stroški iz tega razreda nedopustni in da bi predstavljala pomoč, do katere naj bi bili upravičeni, pomoč pri delovanju, ki je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Doubts regarding the reliability of the criteria used for assessing the viability of the recipients and the latter’s compliance with minimum environmental, hygiene and animal welfare standards.
Pomisleki o verodostojnosti kriterijev za ocenjevanje donosnosti upravičencev in njihovo upoštevanje minimalnih kriterijev na področju okolja, higiene in dobrega počutja živali.
Points 4.1 and 4.2 of the Guidelines stipulate that the holdings receiving the aid are to be assessed for viability on the basis of their prospects and are to comply with certain minimum environmental, hygiene and animal welfare standards.
Točki 4.1 in 4.2 usmeritev natančno opredeljujeta, da se donosnost podjetij, ki so upravičena do pomoči, presoja na podlagi njihovih pričakovanj, in da morajo podjetja spoštovati minimalne zahteve na področju okolja, higiene in dobrega počutja živali.
Moreover, aid may be granted only for products for which there are market outlets.
Poleg tega se lahko odobri pomoč samo za proizvode, ki so na trgu našli svoje mesto.
The matter of outlets was not at issue, since the Regional operational programme, which had been approved by the Commission, laid down precise criteria in that respect.
Vprašanje tržišča ni predstavljalo problema, saj so bili v regijskem operativnem programu, ki ga je sprejela Komisija, in na katerega se projekt nanaša, kriteriji natančno določeni.
On the question of viability, the Italian authorities had referred to Measure 4.9 under the Commission-approved Regional operational programme, which in turn referred to supplementary programming as regards the criteria applicable.
Vprašanje donosnosti so italijanski organi aplicirali na ukrep 4.9 regionalnega operativnega programa, ki ga je sprejela Komisija, ta pa se je navezoval na dodatek za programiranje kriterijev za uporabo.
It emerged from the supplementary programming that the indicators used were gross income and the number of man-work units (MWUs) employed on the holding.
Ob branju slednjega sta se izoblikovala dva kriterija, ki bi jih veljalo upoštevati, in sicer bruto dohodek ter število zaposlenih v podjetju.
In order to be regarded as viable, the holding had to have a gross income of at least four or six ‘gross income economic size units’, depending on the area, and had to employ one MWU at least.
Da bi bilo podjetje donosno, je moralo izkazovati bruto dohodek, ki bi obsegal vsaj 4 ali 6 „enot bruto dohodka z gospodarskega vidika“, glede na območje in zaposlovati vsaj enega delavca.
This criterion was somewhat vague since, on the basis of the information available, it was not possible to establish what a ‘gross income economic size unit’ was.
Takšen kriterij vrednotenja se je pokazal kot dokaj splošen, saj glede na razpoložljive informacije, ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, kaj naj bi pomenila „enota bruto dohodka z gospodarskega vidika“.
Moreover, the number of MWUs employed on the holding does not necessarily reflect its viability.
Število zaposlenih v podjetju ne pomeni nujno donosnosti.
Consequently, when it initiated proceedings, the Commission had doubts regarding the criteria for assessing the viability of the recipients.
Potemtakem je ob uvedbi postopka Komisija dvomila o verodostojnosti kriterijev vrednotenja donosnosti upravičencev.
As regards compliance with the minimum environmental, hygiene and animal welfare standards, the Commission pointed out that the aid was intended to finance work to be carried out pursuant to decrees transposing directives which, in the supplementary programming, were listed among the minimum requirements which agricultural holdings have to comply with in order to be eligible for aid under the Regional operational programme.
Kar zadeva spoštovanje minimalnih zahtev na področju okolja, higiene in dobrega počutja živali, je Komisija menila, da je bila pomoč, namenjena financiranju del, ki se jih je bilo treba lotiti v skladu z dekreti, s katerimi so se sprejemale direktive, ki so jih v dodatku za programiranje prištevali med minimalne zahteve, ki jih morajo kmetijska podjetja spoštovati, da bi bili lahko upravičeni do pomoči iz naslova Regionalnega operativnega programa.
By virtue of the rules governing State aid, agricultural holdings must comply with the above-mentioned minimum requirements in order to be eligible for the aid.
Glede na predpise za pridobitev tovrstne državne pomoči, morajo kmetijska podjetja izpolnjevati minimalne zahteve iz gornjega odstavka, da postanejo upravičena do pomoči.
Moreover, point 4.1.1.3 of the Guidelines allows the assistance to be granted if the investment is intended to satisfy newly introduced minimum environmental, hygiene or animal welfare standards.
Poleg tega, če se v skladu s točko 4.1.1.3 usmeritev vlaganja vršijo z namenom, da bi se prilagodili novim minimalnim zahtevam na področju okolja, higiene in dobrega počutja živali, se lahko podpora odobri za doseganje teh zahtev.
It adds that that in such cases account must be taken of any period specified in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1750/1999 of 23 July 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) [4].
Ista točka tudi določa, da je treba v tem primeru upoštevati obdobje, ki je morebiti določeno, skladno z drugo alineo člena 2 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1750/1999 z dne 23. julija 1999 [4].
In its letter of 7 August 2001 to the Italian authorities the Commission enquired as to the possible nature of any newly introduced standards and when they would be applicable.
V pismu z dne 7. avgusta 2001 je Komisija vprašala italijanske organe, katere bi lahko bile nove zahteve, ki naj bi jih vnesli in v kolikem času naj bi prišlo do njihove uporabe.
In their reply, the Italian authorities stated that they would order an expert survey to be carried out to verify that the minimum standards applicable under the Community, national and regional legislation applicable had been complied with.
V odgovor so italijanski organi sporočili, da bodo izvedli preiskavo za ugotavljanje spoštovanja minimalnih zahtev, ki so jih postavili veljavni predpisi Skupnosti ter državni in pokrajinski predpisi.
This information did not, however, answer the Commission’s questions, insofar as it was not possible to determine which new requirements might be introduced and when they would be applicable.
Takšna informacija ni prinesla nobenega odgovora na vprašanja, ki jih je postavila Komisija, in sicer v smislu, da ni možno določiti, katere nove zahteve bi lahko vpeljali in kakšni bi bili posamezni časi uporabe.
When it initiated proceedings, the Commission could not, therefore, rule out the possibility that the planned aid might be intended solely to fund compliance with standards that were already applicable and were part of the minimum requirements which holdings had to satisfy in order to be awarded aid.
V fazi uvajanja postopka torej Komisija ni mogla izključiti suma, da bi lahko bila pomoč namenjena izključno financiranju prilagajanja kriterijem, ki bi jih že morali uporabljati, in ki so predstavljali minimalne zahteve, ki so jih kmetijska podjetja vsekakor morala spoštovati, da bi bila upravičena do pomoči.
Aid granted to holdings which are in breach of Community rules could not be regarded as compatible with the common market.
Pomoč, ki je bila odobrena podjetjem, ki kršijo predpise Skupnosti, ni v skladu s skupnim trgom.
The Commission therefore had grave doubts as to whether potential recipients satisfied the minimum environmental, hygiene and animal welfare standards applicable by virtue of the Guidelines and, accordingly, as to the eligibility not only of the expenditure concerned but also of the recipients themselves.
Ob teh pojasnilih je imela Komisija resne dvome, ali morebitni upravičenci do pomoči spoštujejo minimalne zahteve na področju okolja, higiene in dobrega počutja živali, ki so predpisane v usmeritvah in zato o primernosti ne samo stroškov, ki jih je treba pokriti, temveč tudi o samih upravičencih do pomoči.
Doubts regarding the possible retrospective nature of the aid
Dvomi o neveljavnosti za nazaj