natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annexes I, II and III to Decision 2004/696/EC are replaced by the following:
Priloge I, II in III k Odločbi 2004/696/ES se nadomestijo z:
List of programmes for the monitoring of TSEs
Seznam programov za spremljanje transmisivnih spongiformnih encefalopatij (TSE)
Rate tests performed [1]
Stopnja opravljenih testov [1] Najvišji znesek
Rapid tests and primary molecular tests.
Hitri in primarni molekularni testi.
List of programmes for the eradication of BSE
Seznam programov za izkoreninjenje goveje spongiformne encefalopatije (BSE)
50 % culling; 100% genotyping
50 % izločitev; 100% genotipizacija
BSE
Goveja spongiformna encefalopatija (BSE)
Maximum amount TSEs
Transmisivne spongiformne encefalopatije (TSE)
amending Decision 2005/237/EC as regards the financial aid from the Community for the operation of the avian influenza Community reference laboratory in 2005
spremembi Odločbe 2005/237/ES v zvezi s finančno pomočjo Skupnosti za delovanje referenčnega laboratorija Skupnosti za aviarno influenco v letu 2005
(notified under document number C(2005) 5617)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2005) 5617)
(Only the English text is authentic)
(Verodostojno je samo angleško besedilo)
Having regard to Council Decision 90/424/EEC of 26 June 1990 on expenditure in the veterinary field [1], and in particular Article 28 (2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 90/424/EGS z dne 26. junija 1990 o odhodkih na področju veterine [1] in zlasti člena 28(2) Odločbe,
Council Directive 92/40/EEC of 19 May 1992 introducing Community measures for the control of avian influenza [2] defines the Community control measures to be applied in the event of an outbreak of avian influenza in poultry.
Direktiva Sveta 92/40/EGS z dne 19. maja 1992 o uvedbi ukrepov Skupnosti za nadzor aviarne influence [2] določa ukrepe nadzora Skupnosti, ki se izvajajo v primeru izbruha aviarne influence pri perutnini.
It also provides for the designation of national avian influenza laboratories and a Community reference laboratory for avian influenza.
Določa tudi imenovanje nacionalnih laboratorijev za aviarno influenco in referenčnega laboratorija Skupnosti za aviarno influenco.
Commission Decision 2005/237/EC of 15 March 2005 on financial aid from the Community for the operation of certain Community reference laboratories in the field of animal health and live animals in 2005 [3] granted Community financial aid to the Community reference laboratory for avian influenza designated in Directive 92/40/EEC.
Odločba Komisije 2005/237/ES z dne 15. marca 2005 o finančni pomoči Skupnosti za delovanje nekaterih referenčnih laboratorijev Skupnosti na področju zdravstvenega varstva živali in živih živali v letu 2005 [3] zagotavlja finančno pomoč Skupnosti za referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti za aviarno influenco, kot je določeno v Direktivi 92/40/EGS.
Recent developments in the animal health situation concerning avian influenza in the Community and third countries have lead to a substantial increase in the amount of work to be carried out by the Community reference laboratory for avian influenza in relation to that disease.
Zadnji razvoj zdravja živali v Skupnosti in tretjih državah glede aviarne influence je občutno povečal količino dela, ki ga mora v zvezi z aviarno influenco opravljati referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti.
The increase is mainly due to the characterisation of viruses submitted to the laboratory and the production and updating of the current panel of reagents and their distribution.
Vzrok za porast je v glavnem karakterizacija virusov, predloženih laboratoriju, in proizvodnja ter posodabljanje trenutnega nabora reagentov in njihovega razdeljevanja.
In addition, the Community reference laboratory for avian influenza plays a key role in supporting the diagnostic units in the national reference avian influenza laboratories, including visits to those laboratories.
Dodatno ima referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti za aviarno influenco ključno vlogo pri podpori diagnostičnih enot v nacionalnih referenčnih laboratorijih za aviarno influenco, vključno z obiski v teh laboratorijih.
The enlargement of the arsenal of available diagnostic, such as the validation of new molecular diagnostic techniques and methodology, issuing of standards and running the inter-laboratory tests that has been added to the functions and duties of the approved work programme for 2005 has incremented the activity carried out in the Community reference laboratory for avian influenza.
Povečanje nabora razpoložljivih diagnoz, kot je potrjevanje novih molekularnih diagnostičnih tehnik in metodologije, objavljanje standardov in opravljanje medlaboratorijskih preskusov, kar je bilo dodano nalogam in zadolžitvam odobrenega delovnega programa za leto 2005, je povečalo število dejavnosti, ki jih opravlja referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti za aviarno influenco.
The Commission has analysed the recent information provided by the Community reference laboratory for avian influenza on the expenditure required for 2005.
Komisija je analizirala zadnje informacije, ki jih je o izdatkih za leto 2005 predložil referenčni laboratorij Skupnosti za aviarno influenco.
Taking into account that information, the Community’s financial contribution to that laboratory needs to be adjusted and it is therefore appropriate to allocate additional funding for 2005.
Ob upoštevanju teh informacij, je treba prilagoditi finančni prispevek Skupnosti navedenemu laboratoriju, zato je primerno dodeliti dodatna finančna sredstva za leto 2005.
Decision 2005/237/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 2005/237/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
In Article 3 of Decision 2005/237/EC, ‘EUR 135000’ is replaced by ‘EUR 285000’.
V členu 3 Odločbe 2005/237/ES se „135000 EUR“ nadomesti s „285000 EUR“.
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu iz leta 2003 (UL L 122, 16.5.2003, str. 1).
OJ L 72, 18.3.2005, p. 47.
UL L 72, 18.3.2005, str. 47.
on the State aid implemented by Germany for Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH, Halle
o državni pomoči Nemčije za Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH, Halle
(notified under document number C(2003) 3375)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko C(2003) 3375)
By letter dated 30 December 1999, Germany informed the Commission of various aid measures for Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH, Halle (hereinafter Jahnke).
Z dopisom z dne 30. decembra 1999 je Nemčija Komisijo obvestila o različnih ukrepih pomoči za Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH, Halle ( v nadaljevanju „Jahnke“).
The case was registered under NN 9/2000.
Zadeva je bila vpisana v evidenco pod številko NN 9/2000.
By letter dated 2 March 2001, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the aid and the notified asset sale.
Z dopisom z dne 2. marca 2001 je Komisija Nemčiji sporočila, da bo v zvezi s to pomočjo in napovedano prodajo premoženja sprožila postopek v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission’s decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Communities [2].
Sklep Komisije je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti [2].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je zainteresirane stranke pozvala, da predložijo svoje pripombe v zvezi s to pomočjo.
Pursuant to Article 10(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [3], the Commission ordered Germany to submit all the information necessary to enable it to verify whether a consolidation loan from the Land of Saxony-Anhalt had been granted in accordance with an approved aid scheme.
V skladu s členom 10(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [3] je Komisija Nemčijo zaprosila, da predloži vse potrebne informacije, da bo lahko preverila, ali je bilo konsolidacijsko posojilo dežele Saška-Anhalt dodeljeno v skladu z odobrenim programom pomoči.
The Commission received no comments from interested parties.
Komisija ni prejela nobenih pripomb drugih zainteresiranih strank.
On 17 May 2001, 22 November 2002 and 17 January 2003 Germany submitted its comments on the opening of the procedure.
maja 2001, 22. novembra 2002 in 17. januarja 2003 je Nemčija predložila svoje pripombe glede sprožitve postopka.
Jahnke is based in Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Jahnke is a steel construction company. Saxony-Anhalt is an area eligible for regional aid pursuant to Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty.
Jahnke, podjetje, ki se ukvarja z gradnjo jeklenih konstrukcij, ima sedež v Halleju (Saška-Anhalt), v regiji prejemnici pomoči v skladu s členom 87(3)(a) Pogodbe ES.
Background
Razvoj
Jahnke was set up on 12 November 1999 by Mr Bernd Jahnke, managing director of the steel construction company Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH Lenzen (hereinafter Jahnke Lenzen). Its object was to take over the assets of HAMESTA Steel GmbH (hereinafter HAMESTA), a company which had filed for bankruptcy in May 1999.
Jahnke je 12. novembra 1999 ustanovil gospod Bernd Jahnke, direktor podjetja Jahnke Stahlbau GmbH Lenzen (v nadaljevanju „Jahnke Lenzen“), z namenom prevzema premoženja podjetja HAMESTA Steel GmbH (v nadaljevanju „HAMESTA“), ki je maja 1999 prijavilo stečaj.
HAMESTA was the successor to Hallesche Metall- und Stahlbau GmbH i.Gv., in bankruptcy since 1998.
HAMESTA je bil naslednik podjetja Hallische Metall- und Stahlbau GmbH i.Gv., ki je bilo od leta 1998 v stečaju.
Hallesche Metall- und Stahlbau GmbH was privatised in 1995 by the Treuhandanstalt by being sold to Thuringia AG.
Podjetje Hallische Metall- und Stahlbau GmbH je bilo leta 1995 privatizirano s strani Treuhandanstalta in prodano delniški družbi Thuringia AG.
The privatisation involved lawful aid of some EUR 37 million.
S privatizacijo je bila povezana dodelitev zakonite pomoči v višini okoli 37 milijonov EUR.
In November 1999, HAMESTA’s receiver informed Mr Jahnke that he could not sell HAMESTA’s assets without the agreement of the meeting of creditors.
Novembra 1999 je stečajni upravitelj podjetja HAMESTA gospodu Jahnkeju sporočil, da bo lahko premoženje podjetja HAMESTA prodal le s soglasjem upniškega odbora.
With a view to a later sale, he envisaged that Jahnke might utilise the assets for a monthly fee of about EUR 13000, payable after 1 January 2000.
Glede na poznejšo prodajo je izrazil možnost, da bi Jahnke lahko uporabljal premoženje podjetja HAMESTA za mesečno najemnino v višini okoli 13000 EUR, plačljivo od 1. januarja 2000.
On 3 February 2001, a draft takeover agreement was drawn up between HAMESTA’s receiver and Mr Jahnke, under the terms of which assets were to be acquired by the investor for an envisaged purchase price of about EUR 2,5 million. However, in the meantime the creditors’ meeting had decided not to proceed with the execution of the takeover agreement, but instead to sell the assets by public auction.
februarja 2001 je bil med stečajnim upraviteljem in gospodom Jahnkejem sestavljen osnutek dogovora o prevzemu, po katerem bi lahko investitor kupil premoženje po predvideni prodajni ceni v višini okoli 2,5 milijona EUR. Medtem je upniški odbor sklenil, da dogovora o prevzemu ne bo uresničil, temveč bo premoženje prodal na javni dražbi.
The takeover agreement, therefore, was not certified and remains ineffective.
Dogovora o prevzemu zato niso potrdili in ostaja neveljaven.
In May 2000 HAMESTA’s receiver and Mr Jahnke signed a new rental agreement (monthly rent of about EUR 11300; duration unlimited; six months’ notice of termination at year’s end).
Maja 2000 sta stečajni upravitelj in gospod Jahnke podpisala novo najemno pogodbo z mesečnimi obrestmi v višini okoli 11300 EUR za neomejen čas in s šestmesečnim odpovednim rokom ob izteku leta.
In November 2002, Germany informed the Commission that, in order to obtain the assets, Jahnke now envisaged first taking over the liens held by two of HAMESTA’s creditors in order to secure its position as buyer.
Novembra 2002 je Nemčija Komisiji sporočila, da je podjetje Jahnke, z namenom pridobiti premoženje, najprej nameravalo od dveh upnikov podjetja HAMESTA prevzeti zastavne pravice, da bi zavarovalo svoj položaj kupca.
To this end Jahnke concluded an agreement with the two creditors to take over their liens in return for EUR 1,54 million.
Jahnke je z obema upnikoma sklenil dogovor o prevzemu zastavnih pravic proti plačilu v višini 1,54 milijona EUR.
According to Germany, the public auction of HAMESTA’s assets has not yet taken place.
Po trditvah Nemčije javne dražbe premoženja HAMESTE še ni bilo.
Jahnke is still the subject of insolvency proceedings.
Podjetje Jahnke je še vedno v stečajnem postopku.
The public auction of HAMESTA’s assets was originally scheduled for 2002 but will now take place at the end of 2003.
Javna dražba premoženja HAMESTE je bila sprva predvidena v letu 2002, vendar bo zdaj konec leta 2003.
The insolvency proceedings against Jahnke will not be concluded before mid-2004.
Stečajni postopek proti podjetju Jahnke ne bo zaključen pred sredino leta 2004.
In March 2001, Jahnke had about 80 employees. It generated a turnover of about EUR 5 million (2000: about EUR 2 million) and an operating profit of about EUR 18000 (2000: about EUR 100000).
Marca 2001 je podjetje Jahnke z okoli 80 zaposlenimi ustvarilo prihodke v višini 5 milijonov EUR (leta 2000 okoli 2 milijona EUR) in dobiček iz poslovanja v višini 18000 EUR (leta 2000 okoli 100000 EUR).
Jahnke Lenzen generated in 2001 a turnover of about EUR 3,3 million (2000: about EUR 4,4 million) and an operating profit of about EUR 21000 (2000: about EUR 71000).
Jahnke Lenzen je leta 2001 ustvarilo prihodke v višini 3,3 milijone EUR (leta 2000 okoli 4,4 milijone EUR) in dobiček iz poslovanja v višini okoli 21000 EUR (leta 2000 okoli 71000 EUR).
Jahnke Lenzen employs about 40 people.
Jahnke Lenzen zaposluje okoli 40 ljudi.
The proposed costs and funding of the restructuring have changed significantly compared with the information initially provided to the Commission in 1999 and 2000.
Načrtovani stroški in denarna sredstva za prestrukturiranje so se znatno spremenili v primerjavi s podatki, ki so bili Komisiji prvotno predloženi v letih 1999 in 2000.
By letter dated 4 September 2000, the following financing requirement was set out:
Z dopisom z dne 4. septembra 2000 je bila določena zahteva glede financiranja:
Financing requirement
Zahteva glede financiranja
Origin of funds (EUR) (rounded figures)
Vir denarnih sredstev v EUR (zaokrožene številke)
Investor’s own funds
Lastna sredstva investitorja
Land of Saxony-Anhalt
Dežela Saška-Anhalt
Bundesanstalt für vereinigungsbedingte Sonderaufgaben (BvS)
Bundesanstalt für vereinigungsbedingte Sonderaufgaben („BvS“)
Purchase price
Nakupna cena:
Up to 2,5 million
do 2,5 mio
20 % of 2,5 million
20 % od 2,5 mio
Guarantee for 80 % of loan 2 million
Jamstvo za 80 % posojila 2 mio
Assets/Current account
Premoženje/tekoči račun:
Share capital:
Delniški kapital:
Financing of orders and start-up costs:
Financiranje naročilin začetni stroški:
Consolidation loan
Konsolidacijsko posojilo
3,58 million
3,58 mio
2,26 million
2,26 mio
Purchase price of the assets of up to EUR 2,5 million
Nakupna cena premoženja do vrednosti 2,5 milijona EUR
The purchase price for the assets was to be financed by a bank loan of EUR 2,5 million, 80 % of which was to be secured by a guarantee provided by the Land of Saxony-Anhalt.
Nakupna cena premoženja naj bi se financirala z bančnim posojilom v višini 2,5 milijona EUR, pri čemer naj bi bilo 80 % zavarovanih z jamstvom dežele Saška-Anhalt.
The remaining 20 % was to be secured by liens and property.
Ostalih 20 % naj bi bilo zavarovanih z zastavnimi pravicami in premoženjem.
The guarantee of the Land of Saxony-Anhalt was to be provided under an approved guarantee scheme [4].
Jamstvo dežele Saška-Anhalt naj bi bilo dodeljeno iz odobrene garancijske sheme [4].
One of the conditions of the scheme is that the criteria set out in the Community guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty (hereinafter the guidelines) have to be fulfilled [5].
Eden izmed pogojev sheme je, da morajo biti izpolnjena merila Smernic Komisije o državni pomoči za reševanje in prestrukturiranje podjetij v težavah („smernice“) [5].
According to Germany, neither the bank loan for the purchase of the assets nor the guarantee has been provided.
Po navedbah Nemčije nista bila dodeljena niti bančno posojilo za nakup premoženja niti jamstvo.
Financing of start-up measures
Financiranje začetnih ukrepov
To cover its start-up costs Jahnke needed working capital totalling EUR 1,08 million mainly for order financing and for its current account facility.
Za pokrivanje začetnih stroškov je podjetje Jahnke potrebovalo gibljiva sredstva v višini 1,08 milijona EUR pretežno za financiranje naročil in za kredit tekočega računa.
To this end the investor contributed EUR 260000, the BvS two loans totalling EUR 560000 and the Land of Saxony-Anhalt a loan of EUR 260000 [6].
V ta namen je investitor prispeval 260000 EUR, Bundesanstalt für vereinigungsbedingte Sonderaufgaben (v nadaljevanju „BvS“) dve posojili v skupni višini 560000 EUR in dežela Saška-Anhalt posojilo v višini 260000 EUR [6].
Subject to approval by the Commission, the loans from the BvS were to be converted into grants.
Po odobritvi Komisije naj bi posojila BvS spremenili v subvencije.
The working capital was needed for maintenance measures, interim financing of outstanding claims and order financing.
Gibljiva sredstva so bila potrebna za ukrepe za vzdrževanje, za začasno financiranje neporavnanih terjatev in za financiranje naročil.
According to the German authorities it is normal practice in the steel construction industry for about 10 % of the order value to be guaranteed by a bank at the outset.
Po navedbah nemških organov je v industriji jeklenih konstrukcij običajno, da okoli 10 % vrednosti naročila na začetku zagotovi banka.
After the work has been completed and the product delivered, the customer has a guarantee claim of 5 % for two to five years.
Po zaključku del in pri dobavi ima stranka pravico iz garancije v višini 5 % za dobo dveh do pet let.
According to Germany, central to the restructuring plan drawn up by the investor is the investor’s acquired know-how; the introduction of effective control and tightening-up of management; the reduction of administrative expenditure; the restructuring of operational areas; and the increased use of the distribution network of Jahnke Lenzen.
Po navedbah Nemčije se načrt investitorja za prestrukturiranje v glavnem opira na znanje in izkušnje, ki jih je sam pridobil, na vpeljavo učinkovitega nadzora in omejitev vodstva podjetja, na zmanjšanje administrativnih stroškov, na prestrukturiranje področij poslovanja in na povečano uveljavljanje storitev distribucijske mreže podjetja Jahnke Lenzen.
The restructuring period was given as 1 December 1999 to 30 November 2002.
Kot obdobje za prestrukturiranje je bil naveden čas od 1. decembra 1999 do 30. novembra 2002.
The restructuring plan foresaw a turnover/annual result of about EUR 8 million/EUR 250000 in 2000, EUR 9 million/EUR 600000 in 2001 and EUR 10 million/EUR 600000 in 2002. The actual turnover/annual result was EUR 2 million/EUR 100000 in 2000 and EUR 5 million/EUR 15000 in 2001.
V skladu z načrtom za prestrukturiranje znaša prihodek/letni rezultat leta 2000 okoli 8 milijonov/250000 EUR, leta 2001 9 milijonov/600000 EUR in leta 2002 10 milijonov/600000 EUR. Leta 2000 je dejanski prihodek/letni rezultat znašal 2 milijona/100000 EUR in leta 2001 5 milijonov/15000 EUR.
The restructuring plan consisted, according to Germany, of the following measures.
Načrt za prestrukturiranje je bil po navedbah Nemčije sestavljen iz spodaj opisanih ukrepov.
Management and employees
Vodstvo in zaposleni
According to Germany, one of the reasons that ultimately resulted in the insolvency of HAMESTA was inadequate management.
Po navedbah Nemčije je bil eden izmed razlogov za stečaj podjetja HAMESTA neprimerno vodstvo.
HAMESTA was overstaffed in its operational and administrative departments, resulting in high costs and inefficient management.
HAMESTA je imela preveč zaposlenih v operativnih in administrativnih oddelkih, kar je vodilo k previsokim stroškom in neučinkovitemu vodstvu.
The total staff was reduced to 80, of which 45 were production staff.
Število zaposlenih se je zmanjšalo na 80, od tega je bilo 45 delavcev zaposlenih v proizvodnji.
Management staff levels were cut especially.
Zelo se je zmanjšalo število zaposlenih v vodstvu.
In addition to the permanent staff, two external consultants, a lawyer and a business adviser were to take over some of the tasks previously performed in-house.
Poleg stalnega osebja naj bi nekaj nalog, ki so se prej opravljale v podjetju, prevzeli dva zunanja svetovalca, en odvetnik in en poslovni svetovalec.
According to Germany, in the past HAMESTA’s management of orders was unbusinesslike.
Po mnenju Nemčije je podjetje HAMESTA v preteklosti neprofesionalno izvrševalo naročila.
The management failed to keep track of any additional work done under contracts and consequently customers were not charged for it.
Pri izpolnjevanju pogodb niso bili sposobni slediti dodatnim naročilom, zaradi česar dodatnega dela strankam niso zaračunali.
This led in turn to contracts being wrongly costed.
To je vodilo k napačnemu obračunavanju naročil.
As part of the restructuring of the enterprise, in December 1999 a start was made with the introduction of a comprehensive business-management plan incorporating the formulation of targets, target-based management and an indication of targets attained, involving the use of modern software for accounting and business planning.
Kot del prestrukturiranja je bil decembra 1999 vpeljan načrt za vodenje podjetja z določitvijo ciljev, vodenja in izpolnjevanja ciljev podjetja, ki se je opiral na sodobno programsko opremo za računovodstvo in poslovno načrtovanje.
In this way, real-time costing became possible for contracts processed.
To je omogočilo dejansko obračunavanje opravljenih del.
Production and more efficient manufacture
Proizvodnja in učinkovitejša izdelava
Existing warehouse stocks were to be properly listed and monitored using a warehouse management system.
S sistemom za spremljanje zalog naj bi zaloge natančno beležili in jih nadzorovali.
In order to reduce waste and offcuts, Jahnke was to obtain its steel requirements directly from the steelworks.
Da bi se izognili odpadkom in odpadnemu materialu, naj bi Jahnke potrebno jeklo dobival neposredno iz jeklarne.
The idea was that the steelworks would cut the raw materials to the required size for each contract and then deliver them to Jahnke by a private rail link.
V skladu z načrtom naj bi surovino v jeklarni razrezali na želeno velikost in jo podjetju Jahnke dostavili z zasebno železniško povezavo.
A new focus for business areas
Nova usmeritev za področja poslovanja
The range of customers was to be diversified by branching out into newer, more profitable activities.
Zaradi prehoda na novejša, donosnejša področja delovanja je bilo potrebno pridobiti nove stranke.
While HAMESTA’s management aimed to process as much steel as possible in the shortest possible time, Jahnke’s objective is to produce high-quality, sophisticated steel structures.
Vodstvo HAMESTE si je prizadevalo v čim krajšem času predelati čim večjo količino jekla, medtem ko podjetje Jahnke stremi k proizvajanju zahtevnejših jeklenih konstrukcij.
While HAMESTA did not specialise in any particular areas of steel structures manufacture, Jahnke Halle has developed a range of higher quality products.
HAMESTA se ni specializirala za nobeno področje jeklenih konstrukcij, Jahnke Halle pa je razvil paleto visoko kakovostnih izdelkov.
In cooperation with an architect, the enterprise’s management has developed a wide range of hangars that incorporate glass and wood elements into the main steel structure.
V sodelovanju z arhitektom je vodstvo podjetja razvilo široko paleto hal, ki v jeklene konstrukcije vključujejo tudi steklene in lesene elemente.