natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the arrangements for avoiding and repaying any overcompensation.
dogovore za preprečitev kakršnega koli prekomernega nadomestila in njegovo vračilo.
Compensation
Nadomestilo
The amount of compensation shall not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs incurred in discharging the public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit on any own capital necessary for discharging those obligations.
Znesek nadomestila ne presega zneska, potrebnega za pokrivanje stroškov, ki so nastali pri izpolnjevanju obveznosti javnih storitev, ob upoštevanju ustreznih prejemkov in zmernega donosa lastnega kapitala, potrebnega za izpolnjevanje navedenih obveznosti.
The compensation must be actually used for the operation of the service of general economic interest concerned, without prejudice to the undertaking’s ability to enjoy a reasonable profit.
To nadomestilo je treba dejansko uporabiti za opravljanje zadevne storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, brez poseganja v sposobnost podjetja, da normalno uživa svoj zmerni dobiček.
The amount of compensation shall include all the advantages granted by the State or through State resources in any form whatsoever.
Znesek nadomestila vključuje vse prednosti, ki jih dodeli država, ali kakršno koli vrsto prednosti iz državnih sredstev.
The reasonable profit shall take account of all or some of the productivity gains achieved by the undertakings concerned during an agreed limited period without reducing the level of quality of the services entrusted to the undertaking by the State.
Zmerni dobiček upošteva vse ali nekatera povečanja produktivnosti, ki so jih zadevna podjetja dosegla v dogovorjenem omejenem obdobju, brez zmanjšanja ravni kakovosti storitev, ki jo je določila država.
The costs to be taken into consideration shall comprise all the costs incurred in the operation of the service of general economic interest.
Stroške, ki jih je treba upoštevati, vključujejo vse stroške, nastale pri opravljanju storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
They shall be calculated, on the basis of generally accepted cost accounting principles, as follows:
Izračun stroškov temelji na splošno sprejetih načelih stroškovnega računovodstva, in sicer:
where the activities of the undertaking in question are confined to the service of general economic interest, all its costs may be taken into consideration;
če so dejavnosti zadevnega podjetja omejene na storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, je treba upoštevati vse njegove stroške;
where the undertaking also carries out activities falling outside the scope of the service of general economic interest, only the costs associated with the service of general economic interest shall be taken into consideration;
če podjetje opravlja tudi dejavnosti zunaj obsega storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, se upoštevajo le stroški, povezani s storitvijo splošnega gospodarskega pomena;
the costs allocated to the service of general economic interest may cover all the variable costs incurred in providing the service of general economic interest, a proportionate contribution to fixed costs common to both service of general economic interest and other activities and a reasonable profit;
stroški, dodeljeni storitvi splošnega gospodarskega pomena, lahko vključujejo vse variabilne stroške, nastale pri opravljanju storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, sorazmeren prispevek k fiksnim stroškom, skupnim storitvi splošnega gospodarskega pomena in drugim dejavnostim, ter zmerni dobiček;
the costs linked with investments, notably concerning infrastructure, may be taken into account when necessary for the operation of the service of general economic interest.
stroški, povezani z naložbami, zlasti v zvezi z infrastrukturo, se lahko upoštevajo, kadar so potrebni za opravljanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
The revenue to be taken into account shall include at least the entire revenue earned from the service of general economic interest.
Prihodek, ki ga je treba upoštevati, vključuje vsaj celotni prihodek, ki ga je ustvarila storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
If the undertaking in question holds special or exclusive rights linked to another service of general economic interest that generates profit in excess of the reasonable profit, or benefits from other advantages granted by the State, these shall be included in its revenue, irrespective of their classification for the purposes of Article 87.
Če ima zadevno podjetje posebne ali izjemne pravice, povezane z drugo storitvijo splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki ustvarja dobiček, ki presega zmerni dobiček, ali ima koristi zaradi drugih prednosti, ki jih dodeli država, se le-te vključijo v njegov prihodek, ne glede na njihovo razvrstitev za namene člena 87.
The Member State concerned may decide that the profits accruing from other activities outside the scope of the service of general economic interest are to be assigned in whole or in part to the financing of the service of general economic interest.
Zadevna država članica se lahko odloči, da je treba dobičke, ki izhajajo iz drugih dejavnosti zunaj obsega storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, v celoti ali delno dodeliti financiranju storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
For the purposes of this Decision ‘reasonable profit’ means a rate of return on own capital that takes account of the risk, or absence of risk, incurred by the undertaking by virtue of the intervention by the Member State, particularly if the latter grants exclusive or special rights.
Za namene te odločbe „zmerni dobiček“ pomeni stopnjo donosa lastnega kapitala, ki upošteva tveganje ali odsotnost tveganja, ki ga je podjetje imelo zaradi intervencije s strani države članice, zlasti če ta odobri izključne ali posebne pravice.
This rate shall not normally exceed the average rate for the sector concerned in recent years.
Ta stopnja običajno ne presega povprečne stopnje za zadevni sektor v zadnjih letih.
In sectors where there is no undertaking comparable to the undertaking entrusted with the operation of the service of general economic interest, a comparison may be made with undertakings situated in other Member States, or if necessary, in other sectors, provided that the particular characteristics of each sector are taken into account.
V sektorjih, kjer ni podjetja, primerljivega s podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, je primerjava možna s podjetji, ki imajo sedež v drugih državah članicah, ali po potrebi s podjetji iz drugih sektorjev, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo posebne značilnosti posameznega sektorja.
In determining what constitutes a reasonable profit, the Member States may introduce incentive criteria relating, in particular, to the quality of service provided and gains in productive efficiency.
Pri določanju pomena zmernega dobička lahko države članice uvedejo merila, iz katerih izhajajo spodbude, ki se zlasti nanašajo na kakovost opravljene storitve in povečanje učinkovitosti proizvodnje.
When a company carries out activities falling both inside and outside the scope of services of general economic interest, the internal accounts shall show separately the costs and receipts associated with the service of general economic interest and those of other services, as well as the parameters for allocating costs and revenues.
Če podjetje opravlja dejavnosti znotraj in zunaj obsega storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, se v internih računovodskih izkazih stroški in prejemki, povezani s storitvijo splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ločeno prikazujejo od tistih, ki so povezani z drugimi storitvami, pa tudi parametri za razporejanje stroškov in prihodkov.
The costs linked to any activities outside the scope of the service of general economic interest shall cover all the variable costs, an appropriate contribution to common fixed costs and an adequate return on capital.
Stroški, povezani s katero koli dejavnostjo zunaj obsega storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, zajemajo vse variabilne stroške, ustrezen prispevek k skupnim fiksnim stroškom in primeren donos kapitala.
No compensation shall be granted in respect of those costs.
V zvezi z navedenimi stroški se ne dodeli nobeno nadomestilo.
Control of overcompensation
Nadzor prekomernega nadomestila
Member States shall carry out regular checks, or ensure that such checks are carried out, to ensure that undertakings are not receiving compensation in excess of the amount determined in accordance with Article 5.
Države članice izvajajo redna preverjanja ali poskrbijo, da se izvajajo takšna preverjanja, da se zagotovi, da podjetja ne prejemajo prekomernega nadomestila zneska, določenega v skladu s členom 5.
Member States shall require the undertaking concerned to repay any overcompensation paid, and the parameters for the calculation of the compensation shall be updated for the future.
Države članice zahtevajo, da zadevno podjetje vrne vsako izplačano prekomerno nadomestilo, za prihodnost pa se posodobijo parametri za izračun nadomestila.
Where the amount of overcompensation does not exceed 10 % of the amount of the annual compensation, such overcompensation may be carried forward to the next annual period and deducted from the amount of compensation payable in respect of that period.
Če znesek prekomernega nadomestila ne presega 10 % zneska letnega nadomestila, se lahko takšno prekomerno nadomestilo prenese na naslednje letno obdobje in odšteje od zneska nadomestila, izplačljivega za navedeno obdobje.
In the sector of social housing, Member States shall carry out regular checks, or ensure that such checks are carried out, at the level of each undertaking, to ensure that the undertaking concerned is not receiving compensation in excess of the amount determined in accordance with Article 5.
Na področju socialnih stanovanj države članice v vsakem podjetju izvajajo redna preverjanja ali poskrbijo, da se izvajajo takšna preverjanja, da zagotovijo, da zadevno podjetje ne prejema nadomestila, ki presega znesek, določen v skladu s členom 5.
Any overcompensation may be carried forward to the next period up to 20 % of the annual compensation, provided that the undertaking concerned only operates services of general economic interest.
Vsako prekomerno nadomestilo se lahko prenese na naslednje obdobje v višini do 20 % letnega nadomestila, pod pogojem, da zadevno podjetje opravlja le storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Availability of information
Razpoložljivost informacij
The Member States shall keep available for a period of at least 10 years, all the elements necessary to determine whether the compensation granted is compatible with this Decision.
Države članice hranijo za obdobje najmanj desetih let vse potrebne dokumente za določitev, ali je dodeljeno nadomestilo združljivo s to odločbo.
Upon a written request from the Commission, Member States shall provide the Commission with all the information that the latter considers necessary to determine whether the systems of compensation in force are compatible with this Decision.
Na pisno zahtevo Komisije države članice Komisiji zagotovijo vse informacije, ki so po mnenju slednje potrebni za določitev, ali so veljavni sistemi nadomestila združljivi s to odločbo.
Periodic reports on the implementation of this Decision, comprising a detailed description of the conditions of application in all sectors, including the social housing and the hospital sectors, shall be submitted to the Commission by each Member State every three years.
Vsaka država članica Komisiji vsake tri leta predloži redna poročila o izvajanju te odločbe s podrobnim opisom pogojev uporabe v vseh sektorjih, vključno s področjem socialnih stanovanj in bolnišnic.
The first report shall be submitted by 19 December 2008.
Prvo poročilo se predloži do 19. decembra 2008.
By 19 December 2009 at the latest, the Commission will undertake an impact assessment based on factual information and the results of wide consultations conducted by the Commission on the basis, notably, of data provided by the Member States in accordance with Article 8.
Najkasneje do 19. decembra 2009 bo Komisija izvedla presojo vpliva na podlagi dejanskih informacij in rezultatov obsežnih posvetovanj pod vodstvom Komisije, zlasti na podlagi podatkov, ki jih države članice predložijo v skladu s členom 8.
The results of the impact assessment will be made available to the European Parliament, the Committee of Regions, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Member States.
Rezultati presoje vpliva bodo na voljo Evropskemu parlamentu, Odboru regij, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in državam članicam.
This Decision shall enter into force on 19 December 2005.
Ta odločba začne veljati 19. decembra 2005.
Points (c), (d) and (e) of Article 4, and Article 6 shall apply from 29 November 2006.
Točke (c), (d) in (e) člena 4 ter člen 6 se uporabljajo od 29. novembra 2006.
ECR I-7747.
Recueil I-7747.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1893/91 (OJ L 169, 29.6.1991, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (EGS) št. 1893/91 (UL L 169, 29.6.1991, str. 1).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 543/97 (OJ L 84, 26.3.1997, p. 6).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 543/97 (UL L 84, 26.3.1997, str. 6).
Regulation as last amended by 2003 Act of Accession.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Aktom o pristopu 2003.
establishing, in accordance with Article 104(8) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, that the action taken by Hungary in response to the recommendation of the Council of 8 March 2005 pursuant to Article 104(7) of the Treaty is proving to be inadequate
o ugotovitvi v skladu s členom 104(8) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, da so ukrepi, ki jih je Madžarska sprejela na podlagi priporočila Sveta z dne 8. marca 2005 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe, neprimerni
According to Article 104 of the Treaty, Member States are to avoid excessive government deficits.
V skladu s členom 104 Pogodbe se morajo države članice izogibati čezmernemu javnofinančnemu primanjkljaju.
The Stability and Growth Pact is based on the objective of sound government finances as a means of strengthening the conditions for price stability and for strong sustainable growth conducive to employment creation.
Pakt za stabilnost in rast temelji na cilju zdravih javnih financ kot sredstvu za izboljšanje pogojev za stabilnost cen in za močno trajnostno rast, ki pospešuje ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
The Stability and Growth Pact includes Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure [1], which was adopted in order to further the prompt correction of excessive general government deficits.
Pakt za stabilnost in rast vključuje Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1467/97 z dne 7. julija 1997 o pospešitvi in razjasnitvi izvajanja postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem [1], sprejeto z namenom nadaljnje spodbuditve hitrega zmanjšanja čezmernih javnofinančnih primanjkljajev.
The Resolution of the European Council on the Stability and Growth Pact in Amsterdam of 17 June 1997 [2] solemnly invites all parties, namely the Member States, the Council and the Commission, to implement the Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact in a strict and timely manner.
Resolucija Evropskega Sveta iz Amsterdama o Paktu za stabilnost in rast z dne 17. junija 1997 [2] slovesno poziva vse strani in sicer države članice, Svet in Komisijo, naj natančno in pravočasno izvajajo Pogodbo in Pakt za stabilnost in rast.
By Council Decision 2004/918/EC of 5 July 2004, the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6), that an excessive deficit exists in Hungary [3].
Svet je z Odločbo Sveta 2004/918/ES z dne 5. julija 2004 v skladu s členom 104(6) sprejel odločitev, da na Madžarskem obstaja čezmerni primanjkljaj [3].
In accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, on 5 July 2004 the Council also adopted a recommendation [4] addressed to the Hungarian authorities and calling on them to bring the existence of an excessive deficit to an end as rapidly as possible and to take action in a medium-term framework to achieve the objective of bringing the deficit below 3 % of GDP by 2008 in a credible and sustainable manner, in accordance with the path for deficit reduction specified in the convergence programme submitted by the authorities and endorsed in the opinion of the Council of 5 July 2004 [5].
Svet je 5. julija 2004 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 sprejel tudi priporočilo [4], naslovljeno na madžarske organe, ki slednje poziva, da kar najhitreje odpravijo stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja in srednjeročno sprejmejo ukrepe za dosego cilja zmanjšanja primanjkljaja pod 3 % BDP do leta 2008 na verodostojen in vzdržen način, v skladu s potekom zmanjšanja primanjkljaja, določenim v konvergenčnem programu, ki so ga predložili organi in je bil potrjen v Mnenju Sveta z dne 5. julija 2004 [5].
That recommendation established the deadline of 5 November 2004 for the Hungarian Government to take effective action regarding the measures envisaged to achieve the original 2005 deficit target of 4,1 % of GDP.
V tem priporočilu je za madžarsko vlado določen rok, da do 5. novembra 2004 sprejme učinkovite ukrepe za dosego prvotnega ciljnega primanjkljaja 4,1 % BDP za leto 2005.
On 18 January 2005, in accordance with Article 104(8) of the Treaty, on the basis of a recommendation by the Commission, the Council recognised that a number of measures had been taken to reduce the government deficit in 2004 and 2005 by the deadline of 5 November 2004.
Svet je 18. januarja 2005 v skladu s členom 104(8) Pogodbe na podlagi priporočila Komisije ugotovil, da so bili do roka 5. novembra 2004 sprejeti številni ukrepi za zmanjšanje javnofinančnega primanjkljaja za leti 2004 in 2005.
However, it considered that they were not sufficient to achieve the targets and would not avoid a deviation from the planned adjustment path of the Hungarian convergence programme of May 2004.
Vendar je bil mnenja, da ti ukrepi ne zadostujejo za dosego ciljev in ne morejo preprečiti odmika od načrtovanega poteka prilagoditve, začrtanega v konvergenčnem programu Madžarske iz maja 2004.
Moreover, it considered that the continued commitment of the government to correct the excessive deficit by 2008 needed to be underpinned by decisive measures of further fiscal consolidation and a more determined pursuit of structural reforms.
Poleg tega je menil, da morajo nadaljnjo zavezanost vlade zmanjšanju čezmernega primanjkljaja do leta 2008 podpreti odločilni ukrepi za nadaljnjo fiskalno konsolidacijo in odločnejše izvajanje strukturnih reform.
Against that background, the Council decided that Hungary had not taken effective action by 5 November 2004 in response to the recommendation of 5 July 2004.
Ob upoštevanju navedenega je Svet odločil, da Madžarska do 5. novembra 2004 ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov na podlagi priporočila z dne 5. julija 2004.
In accordance with Article 104(7) of the Treaty and Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1467/97, on 8 March 2005 the Council adopted a second recommendation [6] addressed to the Hungarian authorities and calling on them to bring the existence of an excessive deficit to an end as rapidly as possible and to take action in a medium-term framework to achieve the objective of bringing the deficit below 3 % of GDP by 2008 in a credible and sustainable manner, in accordance with the path for deficit reduction specified in the convergence programme update submitted by the Hungarian authorities in December 2004 and endorsed in the opinion of the Council of 8 March 2005.
Svet je 8. marca 2005 v skladu s členom 104(7) Pogodbe in členom 3(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 1467/97 sprejel drugo priporočilo [6], naslovljeno na madžarske organe, ki slednje poziva, da kar najhitreje odpravijo stanje čezmernega primanjkljaja in da srednjeročno sprejmejo ukrepe za dosego cilja zmanjšanja primanjkljaja pod 3 % BDP do leta 2008 na verodostojen in vzdržen način v skladu s potekom zmanjšanja primanjkljaja, določenim v dopolnitvi konvergenčnega programa, ki so jo madžarski organi predložili decembra 2004 in je bila potrjena v Mnenju Sveta z dne 8. marca 2005.
Among other things, that recommendation established the deadline of 8 July 2005 for the Hungarian government to take effective action regarding the measures envisaged to achieve the 2005 deficit target of 3,6 % of GDP [7].
V tem priporočilu je med drugim za madžarsko vlado določen rok, da do 8. julija 2005 poskrbi za učinkovito izvajanje ukrepov, predvidenih za dosego ciljnega primanjkljaja v višini 3,6 % BDP za leto 2005 [7].
On 13 July 2005 the Commission adopted a Communication on Hungary.
Komisija je 13. julija 2005 sprejela Sporočilo Madžarski.
On the basis of the information available at the time, including corrective measures decided by the Government in March and June totalling 1,5 % of GDP to compensate for slippages and the firm commitment of the Hungarian government to carry out further measures if necessary, it stated that the Hungarian authorities had taken effective action by the deadline of 8 July 2005, although the situation remained fragile and further measures would be needed in the future.
Na podlagi tedaj razpoložljivih podatkov, vključno s korektivnimi ukrepi v skupni vrednosti 1,5 % BDP, za katere se je vlada odločila marca in junija za izravnavo odstopanj, ter trdno zavezo madžarske vlade, da po potrebi izvede nadaljnje ukrepe, je Komisija navedla, da so madžarski organi do roka 8. julija 2005 sprejeli učinkovite ukrepe, čeprav je položaj še vedno občutljiv in bodo v prihodnosti potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi.
However, the recent developments show that the action taken by the Hungarian authorities is now proving to be inadequate:
Vendar nedavni razvoj kaže, da so ukrepi, ki so jih sprejeli madžarski organi, neprimerni:
the 2005 target of 3,6 % of GDP referred to in the recommendation of the Council (and endorsed in the opinion of the Council of March 2005 December 2004 update of the convergence programme) will be missed by a sizeable margin and the Government has decided not to take new action to correct any slippages contrary to earlier commitments; this is confirmed by the revised EDP notification by the Hungarian authorities on 20 September 2005 of a deficit of 6,1 % of GDP for 2005.
Ciljni primanjkljaj v višini 3,6 % BDP za leto 2005, naveden v priporočilu Sveta (in odobren v Mnenju Sveta iz marca 2005 glede dopolnitve konvergenčnega programa iz decembra 2004), bo znatno presežen in vlada se je v nasprotju s svojimi prejšnjimi zavezami odločila, da ne bo sprejela novih ukrepov za korekcijo morebitnih odstopanj; to so madžarski organi potrdili z revidirano priglasitvijo postopka v zvezi s čezmernim primanjkljajem z dne 20. septembra 2005, v kateri je primanjkljaj za leto 2005 znašal 6,1 % BDP.
The outcome for 2005 will be worse if further slippages occur (not excluded particularly on the expenditure side) and are also not compensated by corrective measures.
Izid za leto 2005 bo v primeru nadaljnjih odstopanj, ki jih prav tako ne bi nadomestili korektivni ukrepi, še neugodnejši (kar zlasti ni izključeno na strani odhodkov).
According to this notification, the debt-to-GDP ratio in 2005 will remain below the 60 % threshold, at 57,1 %,
V skladu s to priglasitvijo bo delež dolga v razmerju do BDP v letu 2005 ostal pod mejo 60 % in bo znašal 57,1 %.
the target for 2006 contained in the convergence programme update and the recommendation adopted by the Council on 8 March 2005 that the deficit be brought to 2,9 % of GDP has been abandoned by the authorities.
Organi so opustili cilj zmanjšanja primanjkljaja na raven 2,9 % BDP za leto 2006 iz dopolnitve konvergenčnega programa in priporočila, ki ga je Svet sprejel 8. marca 2005.