natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
FARES’ of the notice published in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004, which is expressly referred to for the purposes of this Decision.
PREVOZNINE“ uvedbe, ki je objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004, v katerem se izrecno sklicuje na to odločbo.
In particular, regarding reduced fares, point 4.8 of the notice states that carriers operating on the affected routes are legally bound to apply the reduced fares (specified under ‘4.
Točka 4.8 uvedbe v povezavi z obstojem znižanih prevoznin zlasti navaja, da imajo letalski prevozniki, ki opravljajo prevoze na zadevnih letalskih progah, pravno obveznost uporabe znižanih prevoznin (kot so navedene v naslovu „4.
FARES’), to at least the following groups of passengers:
Prevoznine“) predvsem za naslednje skupine potnikov:
people born in Sardinia, even if they do not live in Sardinia,
osebe, rojene na Sardiniji, tudi če ne prebivajo na tem otoku,
spouses and children of people born in Sardinia.
zakonci in otroci oseb, rojenih na Sardiniji.
The public service obligations are valid from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007.
Obveznosti javnih služb veljajo od 1. januarja 2005 do 31. decembra 2007.
Carriers intending to accept the public service obligations must present a formal acceptance to the competent Italian authority within 15 days of publication of the notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Letalski prevozniki, ki nameravajo sprejeti obveznosti javnih služb, morajo to v petnajstih dneh po objavi uvedbe v Uradnem listu Evropske unije v pisni obliki sporočiti pristojnemu italijanskemu organu.
It should be noted that prior to imposing the public service obligations referred to in this Decision, the Italian Republic had imposed public service obligations, first published in Official Journal of the European Union C 284 of 7 October 2000 [3], on six routes between the Sardinian airports and Rome and Milan.
Upoštevati je treba, da je Republika Italija pred uvedbo obveznosti javnih služb, ki je predmet te odločbe, uvedla obveznosti javnih služb, prvotno objavljenih v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, C 284 z dne 7. oktobra 2000 [3], za šest letalskih prog med letališči na Sardiniji ter letališčema Rim in Milano.
In accordance with Article 4(1)(d) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, these had been put out to tender [4] to select the carriers authorised to operate these routes on an exclusive basis with financial compensation.
V skladu s členom 4(1)(d) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 so bile le-te predmet javnega razpisa [4], na podlagi katerega se je izbralo in pooblastilo letalske prevoznike za izključno opravljanje prevozov na letalskih progah, za katero so dobili finančno nadomestilo.
The carriers authorised to operate the routes in accordance with the public service obligations imposed were:
Letalski prevozniki, pooblaščeni za izpolnjevanje obveznosti javnih služb, so:
Merdiana: Olbia–Rome and Olbia–Milan.
Merdiana za letalski progi Olbia–Rim in Olbia–Milano.
These arrangements were replaced by the public service obligations which are the subject of this Decision.
Ta režim izpolnjevanja obveznosti se je nadomestil z uvedbo, ki je predmet te odločbe.
Essential elements of the rules on public service obligations
Ključni elementi pravnega sistema obveznosti javnih služb
The rules on public service obligations are laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, which defines the conditions for applying the principle of freedom to provide services in the air transport sector.
Pravni sistem obveznosti javnih služb je določen z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2408/92, katere cilj je opredeliti pogoje za uporabo načela prostega pretoka storitev na področju zračnih prevozov.
Public service obligations are defined as an exception to the principle of the Regulation that ‘subject to this Regulation, Community air carriers shall be permitted by the Member State(s) concerned to exercise traffic rights on routes within the Community’ [5].
Obveznosti javnih služb so opisane kot izjema pri načelu Uredbe, na podlagi katere „ob upoštevanju te uredbe zadevna(-e) država(-e) članica(-e) pooblasti(-jo) letalske prevoznike Skupnosti za uveljavljanje prometnih pravic na letalskih progah znotraj Skupnosti.“ [5]
The conditions for imposing them are defined in Article 4.
Pogoji njihove uvedbe so navedeni v členu 4.
They are interpreted strictly and in accordance with the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality.
Pri tem se strogo upošteva načeli nediskriminacije in sorazmernosti.
They must be adequately justified on the basis of the criteria laid down in the same Article.
Biti morajo ustrezno utemeljene na podlagi meril iz tega člena.
More precisely, the rules governing public service obligations provide that these may be imposed by a Member State in respect of scheduled air services to an airport serving a peripheral or development region in its territory or on a thin route to any regional airport, provided the route is considered vital for the economic development of the region in which the airport is located and to the extent necessary to ensure on that route the adequate provision of scheduled air services satisfying fixed standards of continuity, regularity, capacity and pricing, standards which air carriers would not meet if they were solely considering their commercial interest.
Pravni režim obveznosti javnih služb natančneje določa, da lahko vsaka država članica uvede obveznosti javnih služb za redne zračne prevoze do letališča, ki oskrbuje obrobno območje ali območje v razvoju na njenem ozemlju, ali na progi z redkim prometom do katerega koli regionalnega letališča na njenem ozemlju, če takšna letalska proga velja kot izredno pomembna za gospodarski razvoj območja, kjer je to letališče, in sicer do obsega, ki je nujno potreben, da se na tej letalski progi zagotovi ustrezno opravljanje rednih zračnih prevozov, ki zadovoljujejo ustaljene standarde neprekinjenosti, rednosti, zmogljivosti in določanja cen, ki jih letalski prevozniki ne bi prevzeli, če bi upoštevali le svoje komercialne interese.
The adequacy of scheduled air services is assessed by the Member States having regard to the public interest, the possibility of having recourse to other forms of transport, the ability of such forms to meet the transport needs under consideration and the combined effect of all air carriers operating or intending to operate on the route.
Primernost rednih zračnih prevozov presodijo države članice zlasti glede na javni interes, možnost uporabe drugih oblik prevoza, zmožnost, da te oblike prevoza zadostijo prevoznim potrebam, skupni učinek vseh letalskih prevoznikov, ki opravljajo ali nameravajo opravljati prevoze na zadevni progi.
Article 4 provides for a two-phase mechanism: in the first phase (Article 4(1)(a)) the Member State concerned imposes a public service obligation on one or more routes, which are open to all Community carriers, provided they meet the obligations.
Člen 4 določa mehanizem v dveh fazah: v prvi fazi (člen 4(1)(a)) zadevna država članica uvede obveznosti javnih služb za eno ali več letalskih prog, ki ostanejo na voljo vsem letalskim prevoznikom Skupnosti z edino omejitvijo, ki je upoštevanje navedenih obveznosti.
Where no carrier applies to operate the route on which the public service obligation has been imposed, the Member State can move on to a second phase (Article 4(1)(d)) which limits access to that route to only one carrier for a renewable period of up to three years.
Če noben letalski prevoznik še ni začel ali v kratkem ne bo začel z rednimi zračnimi prevozi na letalski progi v skladu z obveznostjo javne službe, ki je bila uvedena na tej progi, lahko država članica preide v drugo fazo (člen 4(1)(d)) in omeji dostop do te letalske proge na enega samega letalskega prevoznika za obdobje največ treh let, ki se lahko podaljša.
The carrier is selected by a Community tender procedure.
Ta letalski prevoznik je izbran na podlagi javnega razpisa Skupnosti.
The selected carrier can then receive financial compensation for operating the route in accordance with the public service obligation.
Letalski prevoznik, ki je bil izbran, lahko prejme finančno nadomestilo za povrnitev stroškov, nastalih zaradi izpolnjevanja obveznosti javnih služb.
By virtue of Article 4(3) the Commission may decide, following an investigation, carried out either at the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, whether the public service obligation published should continue to apply.
V skladu s členom 4(3) je Komisija pristojna, da na zahtevo države članice ali na lastno pobudo izvede preiskavo in na podlagi le-te ugotovi, ali se objavljena uvedba obveznosti javnih služb še naprej uporablja.
The Commission must communicate its decision to the Council and to the Member States.
Komisija svojo odločitev sporoči Svetu in državam članicam.
Any Member State may refer the matter to the Council which, acting by a qualified majority, may take a different decision.
Svet, ki mu država članica to odločitev predloži v obravnavo, lahko s kvalificirano večino sprejme drugačno odločitev.
Elements raising serious doubts as to the conformity of the public service obligations imposed on routes between the Sardinian airports and the main national airports with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92
Obstoj elementov, ki povzročajo resen dvom v zvezi s skladnostjo obveznosti javnih služb, uvedenih med letališči na Sardiniji in glavnimi italijanskimi letališči, s členom 4 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92
Article 4(1)(a) of the Regulation lists a certain number of cumulative criteria for imposing public service obligations:
Člen 4(1)(a) Uredbe navaja določeno število kumulativnih meril, s katerimi morajo biti skladne obveznosti javnih služb:
Type of route eligible: routes to an airport serving a peripheral or development region in the territory of the Member State concerned or on a thin route to any regional airport in that territory.
vrsta upravičenih letalskih prog: to so proge do letališča, ki oskrbuje obrobno območje ali območje v razvoju na njenem ozemlju, ali proge z redkim prometom do katerega koli regionalnega letališča na njenem ozemlju,
It must be recognised that the route is vital for the economic development of the region in which the airport served is located.
letalska proga mora veljati kot izredno pomembna za gospodarski razvoj območja, kjer je to letališče,
The principle of adequacy, assessed having regard to the existence of other means of transport or alternative routes, must be observed.
upoštevati je treba načelo primernosti, zlasti v zvezi z obstojem drugih oblik prevoza ali možnostmi nadomestnih letalskih prog.
In addition, the public service obligations must comply with the basic principles of proportionality and non-discrimination (see, for example, Court of Justice decision of 20 February 2001, in case C-205/99, Asociación Profesional de Empresas Navieras de Líneas Regulares (Analir) and others v Administración General del Estado, [2001] ECR p. I-01271).
Obveznosti javnih služb morajo poleg tega upoštevati temeljni načeli sorazmernosti in nediskriminacije (glej npr. odločitev Evropskega sodišča z dne 20. februarja 2001, zadeva C-205/99, Asociación Profesional de Empresas Navieras de Líneas Regulares (Analir) in drugi v Administracíon General del Estado, (2001), str. I-01271).
In the case in point, the notice imposing public service obligations published in the Official Journal at the request of the Italian Republic contains several provisions which raise serious doubts as to their conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation, and are therefore likely to restrict unduly the development of the routes concerned; in particular:
V tem primeru uvedba obveznosti javnih služb, objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije na zahtevo Republike Italije, vsebuje več določb, ki povzročajo resen dvom v zvezi s skladnostjo obveznosti javnih služb s členom 4 Uredbe, zato le-te neupravičeno ovirajo razvoj zadevnih letalskih prog, zlasti:
No detailed explanation based on an economic analysis of the air transport market between Sardinia and the rest of Italy has been provided, to justify the need for the new public service obligations, their appropriateness and their proportionality to the objective.
posredovano ni bilo nobeno podrobno pojasnilo, temelječe na gospodarski analizi trga zračnih prevozov med Sardinijo in preostalo Italijo, za utemeljitev potrebe po novi uvedbi, njeni primernosti in njenim sorazmernim značajem z željenim ciljem;
The six routes covered by the previous notice and included in the new one have not been assessed.
šest letalskih prog, ki so že podvržene predhodni uvedbi in povzete v novi, niso bile predmet ocene;
It is not evident that the 12 other routes on which public service obligations have been imposed since 1 January 2005 are vital for the economic development of the regions of Sardinia where the airports concerned are located; considering in particular:
za dvanajst dodatnih zadevnih letalskih prog od 1. januarja 2005 z uvedbo obveznosti javnih služb ni razvidno, da so izredno pomembne za gospodarski razvoj območij Sardinije, kjer so zadevna letališča; pri tem se zlasti upošteva:
The nature of the routes concerned,
značaj zadevnih letalskih prog,
It has not been shown that these routes are vital for the economic development of the regions of Sardinia in which the airports concerned are located,
odsotnost izredno pomembnega značaja teh letalskih prog za gospodarski razvoj območij Sardinije, kjer so zadevna letališča,
The existence of alternative air routes which allow an adequate and continuous service to be provided to the airports concerned, via the main Italian hubs linked in a satisfactory manner with Sardinia.
obstoj nadomestnih letalskih prog, ki zagotavljajo ustrezno neprekinjeno opravljanje storitev v povezavi z zadevnimi letališči preko glavnih italijanskih središč, zadovoljivo povezanih s Sardinijo;
it has not been shown that grouping all these routes together is vital for the economic development of the regions of Sardinia in which the airports concerned are located,
odsotnost izredno pomembnega značaja te skupine letalskih prog za gospodarski razvoj območij Sardinije, kjer so zadevna letališča,
the risk of unjustified discrimination between carriers, where only the largest ones have the means to operate in such conditions,
tveganje neupravičene diskriminacije med letalskimi prevozniki, saj le najpomembnejši med njimi razpolagajo s sredstvi za opravljanje prevozov v določenih pogojih,
in addition, such a requirement is contrary to the need for the Member State imposing the public service obligations to take account in its assessment of the combined effect of all air carriers operating or intending to operate on the route [6].
takšna obveznost je poleg tega v nasprotju s potrebo države članice, ki uvede obveznosti javnih služb, da v svoji oceni upošteva skupni učinek opravljanja prevozov na zadevnih letalskih progah s strani vseh letalskih prevoznikov, ki opravljajo ali nameravajo opravljati prevoze na zadevnih progah [6].
In fact, the Italian authorities wanted to impose the requirement that the eighteen routes be operated as a single package in order to finance the operating losses of thin routes by the expected proceeds of the operation of the most important routes.
V bistvu so italijanski organi želeli uvesti obveznost opravljanja prevozov celotne zadevne skupine osemnajstih letalskih prog zato, da bi primanjkljaj pri opravljanju prevozov na letalskih progah z redkim prometom financirali s pričakovanim dohodkom od opravljanja prevozov na najpomembnejših progah.
Such cross-subsidisation is alien to Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92.
Takšen mehanizem nepravičnega notranjega subvencioniranja ni naveden v členu 4 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92;
The requirement to provide a security of a particularly high amount is also likely to create unjustified discrimination between interested carriers, where only the largest ones have the means to offer such guarantees.
obveznost plačila zelo visokega zneska jamstva prav tako predstavlja diskriminacijo med zainteresiranimi letalskimi prevozniki, saj le najpomembnejši med njimi razpolagajo s sredstvi za plačilo takšnih jamstev;
The requirement, in point 4.8 of the notice, that reduced fares must be applied to passengers solely because of their place of birth (in this case Sardinia) or for the sole reason that they have family links with such persons may in fact be unlawful discrimination based on nationality (see for example case C-338/01 Commission v Italy [2003] ECR p. I-00721).
obveznost iz točke 4.8 uvedbe, ki se nanaša na uporabo znižanih prevoznin za potnike glede na njihov kraj rojstva (v tem primeru na Sardiniji) ali glede na obstoj družinskih vezi teh ljudi, v resnici predstavlja nezakonito diskriminacijo, ki temelji na narodnosti (glej npr. zadevo C-338/01 Komisija proti Italiji (2003) str. I-00721).
Despite repeated calls from the Commission drawing the attention of the Italian authorities to these problems and expressing doubts as to the conformity of the notice imposing public service obligations with Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, the Italian Republic decided to have it published.
Kljub večkratnem pozivu služb Komisije, ki so skušale pridobiti pozornost italijanskih organov v zvezi s številnimi problematičnimi elementi in ki so izrazile dvom o skladnosti uvedbe obveznosti javnih služb z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2408/92, se je Republika Italija odločila uvedbo objaviti.
As soon as it was published, several interested parties contacted the Commission to informally express their concerns regarding the disproportionate and discriminatory nature of the public service obligations.
Od njene objave so nekatere zainteresirane strani Komisiji na neformalni način izrazile svojo zaskrbljenost v zvezi z nesorazmernim in diskriminatornim značajem obveznosti javnih služb.
The Commission also received a complaint contesting the legality of these obligations (the author wished to remain anonymous).
Poleg tega je bila Komisiji predložena pritožba, v kateri je tožnik, ki je želel ostati anonimen, skušal spodbijati zakonitost teh obveznosti.
In the light of the above, and by virtue of Article 4(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992, the Commission may carry out an investigation to determine whether the development of one or more routes is unduly restricted by the imposition of public service obligations, in order to decide whether these obligations should continue to be imposed on the routes in question.
Glede na zgoraj opisane elemente in v skladu s členom 4(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92 Komisija lahko izvede preiskavo za ugotovitev, ali je razvoj ene ali več letalskih povezav neupravičeno oviran zaradi uvedbe obveznosti javnih služb, preden odloči, ali se uvedba navedenih obveznosti še naprej uporablja za zadevne letalske proge –
The Commission will carry out an investigation, as provided for in Article 4(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92, in order to determine whether the public service obligations imposed on routes between the Sardinian airports and the main national airports, published at the request of the Italian Republic in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004, should continue to apply to these routes.
Komisija sklene izvesti preiskavo, predvideno v členu 4(3) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92, za ugotovitev, ali se uvedba obveznosti javnih služb med letališči na Sardiniji in glavnimi italijanskimi letališči, objavljena na zahtevo Republike Italije v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004, še naprej uporablja za zadevne letalske proge.
The Italian Republic shall transmit to the Commission, within one month following the notification of this Decision, all the information necessary for examining the conformity of the public service obligations referred to in Article 1 with Article 4 of Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92.
Republika Italija mora Komisiji v enem mesecu po obvestilu o tej odločbi Komisiji posredovati vse potrebne podatke za preiskavo v zvezi s skladnostjo obveznosti javnih služb iz člena 1 s členom 4 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2408/92.
In particular, the following shall be transmitted:
Posredovati mora zlasti:
The legal analysis of the impact on the exercise by all European air carriers of traffic rights in respect of the routes to which the public service obligations published in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004 apply, in the event that these obligations are effectively complied with.
pravno analizo posledic uveljavljanja prometnih pravic za zadevne letalske proge, ki so podvržene obveznostim javnih služb, objavljenih v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004, s strani evropskih letalskih prevoznikov, če so te obveznosti uspešno izpolnjevane,
In particular, it must be stated whether the Italian authorities intended to create an exclusive right to operate the 18 routes for the carrier or carriers which formally accepted the obligations.
treba je zlasti navesti, ali so italijanski organi s tem ustvarili izključno pravico opravljanja prevozov na osemnajstih letalskih progah v korist letalskega(-ih) prevoznika(-ov), ki je(so) uradno sprejel(-i) obveznosti,
The legal analysis, with regard to Community law, justifying the different conditions contained in the notice imposing public service obligations published in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004.
pravno analizo glede zakonodaje Skupnosti z utemeljitvijo različnih pogojev, ki jih vsebuje uvedba obveznosti javnih služb, objavljenih v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004,
The reasons for imposing reduced fares only for ‘People born in Sardinia, even if they do not live in Sardinia and spouses and children of people born in Sardinia’.
razloge za uvedbo znižanih prevoznin le v korist „oseb, rojenih na Sardiniji, tudi če ne prebivajo na tem otoku ter zakoncev in otrok oseb, rojenih na Sardiniji“,
A detailed assessment of the implementation of the public service obligations published in Official Journal of the European Union C 284 of 7 October 2000.
podrobno oceno uvedbe obveznosti javnih služb, objavljenih v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 284 z dne 7. oktobra 2000,
A detailed analysis of the economic relations between the regions of Sardinia and the other regions of Italy where the airports concerned by the public service obligations published in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004 are located.
podrobno analizo ekonomskih odnosov med območji na Sardiniji in območji preostale Italije, kjer so letališča, za katere veljajo obveznosti javnih služb, objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004,
A detailed analysis of the current supply of air transport between the Sardinian airports and the other Italian airports concerned by the public service obligations published in Official Journal of the European Union C 306 of 10 December 2004, including the supply of indirect flights.
podrobno analizo dejanske ponudbe zračnega prevoza med letališči na Sardiniji in preostalimi italijanskimi letališči, za katera veljajo obveznosti javnih služb, objavljene v Uradnem listu Evropske unije C 306 z dne 10. decembra 2004, vključno s ponudbami indirektnih letov,
A detailed analysis of the availability of other means of transport and their capacity to meet the transport needs under consideration.
podrobno analizo možnosti uporabe drugih oblik prevoza in zmožnost teh oblik, da izpolnjujejo zadevne potrebe po prevozu,
An analysis of the current demand for air transport for each route concerned by these obligations.
analizo dejanskega povpraševanja po zračnem prevozu za vsako zadevno letalsko progo, za katero veljajo te obveznosti,
A precise description of the journey times and frequency required to connect by road the different Sardinian airports concerned by these obligations.
podrobni opis potrebnega časa leta in raven pogostosti letov na letalskih progah, ki povezujejo različna zadevna letališča na Sardiniji, za katera veljajo te obveznosti,