natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As on-the-spot inspections of the concerned establishment have not yet been carried out, imports from it should not be eligible for reduced physical checks pursuant to Council Directive 97/78/EC of 18 December 1997 laying down the principles governing the organisation of veterinary checks on products entering the Community from third countries [3].
Ker pregledi zadevnega obrata na kraju samem še niso bili izvedeni, za uvoze iz tega obrata ne velja zmanjšana pogostnost fizičnih pregledov na podlagi Direktive Sveta 97/78/ES z dne 18. decembra 1997 o določitvi načel, ki urejajo organizacijo veterinarskih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost iz tretjih držav [3].
Decision 97/467/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
Odločbo 97/467/ES je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
Annex II to Decision 97/467/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.
Priloga II k Odločbi 97/467/ES se spremeni v skladu s Prilogo k tej odločbi.
This Decision shall apply from 21 April 2005.
Ta odločba se uporablja od 21. aprila 2005.
Done at Brussels, 31 March 2005.
V Bruslju, 31. marca 2005
Decision as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33); Corrigendum in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12.
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/41/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33. Popravljena različica v UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
OJ L 199, 26.7.1997, p. 57.
UL L 199, 26.7.1997, str. 57.
Decision as last amended by Decision 2004/591/EC (OJ L 263, 10.8.2004, p. 21).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2004/591/ES (UL L 263, 10.8.2004, str. 21).
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1); Corrigendum in OJ L 191, 28.5.2004, p. 1.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 882/2004 (UL L 165, 30.4.2004, str. 1. Popravljena različica v UL L 191, 28.5.2004, str. 1).
‘País: Croacia/Země: Chorvatsko/Land: Kroatien/Land: Kroatien/Riik: Horvaatia/Χώρα: Κροατία/Country: Croatia/Pays: Croatie/Paese: Croazia/Valsts: Horvātija/Šalis: Kroatija/Ország: Horvátorszag/Pajjiż: Il-Kroazja/Land: Kroatie/Państwo: Chorwacja/País: Croácia/Krajina: Chorvátsko/Država: Hrvaška/Maa: Kroatia/Land: Kroatien
„País: Croacia/Země: Chorvatsko/Land: Kroatien/Land: Kroatien/Riik: Horvaatia/Χώρα: Κροατία/Country: Croatia/Pays: Croatie/Paese: Croazia/Valsts: Horvātija/Šalis: Kroatija/Ország: Horvátorszag/Pajjiż: Il-Kroazja/Land: Kroatie/Państwo: Chorwacja/País: Croácia/Krajina: Chorvátsko/Država: Hrvaška/Maa: Horvaatia/Land: Kroatien
concerning the non-inclusion of cresylic acid, dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin and polyoxin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances
o nevključitvi krezolne kisline, diklorofena, imazametabenza, kasugamicina in polioksina v Prilogo I k Direktivi Sveta 91/414/EGS in o odvzemu registracij za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo te snovi
(notified under document number C(2005) 975)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 975)
Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that a Member State may, during a period of 12 years following the notification of that Directive, authorise the placing on the market of plant protection products containing active substances not listed in Annex I to that Directive that are already on the market two years after the date of notification, while those substances are gradually being examined within the framework of a programme of work.
Člen 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS predvideva, da lahko država članica v 12 letih od notifikacije navedene direktive registrira za dajanje v promet fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo aktivne snovi, ki niso uvrščene v Prilogo I k navedeni direktivi, in so že v prometu dve leti po dnevu notifikacije, medtem ko se te snovi postopno preučujejo v okviru delovnega programa.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 [2] and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 [3] lay down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 451/2000 [2] in Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1490/2002 [3] določata podrobna pravila za izvajanje druge in tretje faze delovnega programa iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
For active substances for which a notifier fails to fulfil its obligations under these Regulations no completeness check or evaluation of the dossier shall be performed.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere prijavitelj ne izpolni svojih obveznosti po navedenih uredbah, se ne opravi preverjanje popolnosti oziroma ocena dokumentacije.
For cresylic acid, dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin and polyoxin either no complete dossier has been submitted or the notifier has declared that no dossier will be submitted within the prescribed time limit.
Za krezolno kislino, diklorofen, imazametabenz, kasugamicin in polioksin ni bila niti predložena popolna dokumentacija niti ni prijavitelj navedel, da ne bo predložil dokumentacije v predpisanem roku.
As a consequence, these active substances should not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC and Member States should withdraw all authorisations for plant protection products containing these substances.
Zaradi tega se navedene aktivne snovi ne bi smele vključiti v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS in države članice morajo odvzeti vse registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo te snovi.
For the active substances for which there is only a short period of advance notice for the withdrawal of plant protection products containing such substances, it is reasonable to provide for a period of grace for disposal, storage, placing on the market and use of existing stocks for a period of no longer than 12 months to allow existing stocks to be used in no more than one further growing season.
Za aktivne snovi, za katere je rok predhodnega obvestila o umiku fitofarmacevtskih sredstev, ki vsebujejo take snovi, kratek, je smiselno odobriti prehodno obdobje za odstranitev, skladiščenje, dajanje v promet in uporabo obstoječih zalog za obdobje, ki ni daljše od 12 mesecev zato, da se obstoječe zaloge uporabljajo v največ enem nadaljnjem rastnem obdobju.
In cases where a longer advance notice period is provided, such period can be shortened to expire at the end of the growing season.
V primerih, ko je predviden daljši rok predhodnega obvestila, se ta rok lahko skrajša tako, da se izteče ob koncu rastne sezone.
For dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin and polyoxin, information has been presented and evaluated by the Commission together with Member State experts which has shown a need for further use of the substance concerned.
Za krezolno kislino, diklorofen, imazametabenz, kasugamicin in polioksin je Komisija skupaj s strokovnjaki držav članic predstavila in ocenila podatke, in ki so pokazali potrebo po nadaljnji uporabi zadevne snovi.
In such cases temporary measures should be provided for to enable the development of alternatives.
V takih primerih je treba določiti začasne ukrepe, da bi omogočili razvoj drugih možnosti.
Cresylic acid, dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin and polyoxin shall not be included in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC.
Krezolna kislina, diklorofen, imazametabenz, kasugamicin in polioksin se ne vključijo v Prilogo I k Direktivi 91/414/EGS.
Authorisations for plant protection products containing cresylic acid, dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin or polyoxin are withdrawn by 30 September 2005.
se registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo krezolno kislino, diklorofen, imazametabenz, kasugamicin ali polioksin odvzamejo do 30. septembra 2005;
From 15 April 2005 no authorisations for plant protection products containing cresylic acid, dichlorophen, imazamethabenz, kasugamycin or polyoxin are granted or renewed under the derogation provided for in Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
se od 15. aprila 2005 registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo krezolno kislino, diklorofen, imazametabenz, kasugamicin ali polioksin ne odobrijo ali obnovijo v skladu z odstopanjem iz člena 8(2) Direktive 91/414/EGS;
By derogation from point 1, Member States listed in column B of the Annex may maintain authorisations for plant protection products containing substances listed in column A for uses listed in column C of that Annex until 30 June 2007 at the latest, to permit the development of an efficient alternative for the substance concerned.
lahko z odstopanjem od odstavka 1 države članice, naštete v stolpcu B Priloge, obdržijo registracije za fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki vsebujejo snovi, naštete v stolpcu A, za uporabe, naštete v stolpcu C navedene priloge, najpozneje do 30. junija 2007, da bi dovolili razvoj učinkovite zamenjave za zadevno snov.
Member States making use of the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall ensure that the following conditions are complied with:
Države članice, ki uporabljajo odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka, zagotovijo, da se upoštevajo naslednji pogoji:
the continued use is only accepted so far as it has no harmful effects on human or animal health and no unacceptable influence on the environment;
nadaljnja uporaba je sprejemljiva le v kolikor ne učinkuje škodljivo na zdravje ljudi ali živali in nima nesprejemljivega vpliva na okolje;
such plant protection products remaining on the market after 30 September 2005 are relabelled in order to match the restricted use conditions;
taka fitofarmacevtska sredstva, ki ostanejo na trgu po 30. septembru 2005, so ponovno označena, da tako ustrezajo omejenim pogojem uporabe;
all appropriate risk mitigation measures are imposed to reduce any possible risks;
uvedejo se vsi primerni ukrepi za zmanjšanje tveganja z namenom zmanjšanja vseh morebitnih tveganj;
alternatives for such uses are being seriously sought.
resno se iščejo druge možnosti za takšne uporabe.
The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission about the measures taken in application of point 3, and in particular about the actions taken pursuant to points (a) to (d), by 31 March 2005 at the latest.
Zadevna država članica najkasneje do 31. marca 2005 obvesti Komisijo o ukrepih, sprejetih na podlagi odstavka 3, in zlasti o ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s točkami (a) do (d).
Any period of grace granted by Member States in accordance with Article 4(6) of Directive 91/414/EEC, shall be as short as possible.
Kakršna koli prehodna obdobja, ki jih odobrijo države članice v skladu s členom 4(6) Direktive 91/414/EGS, morajo biti čim krajša.
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 2(1) by 30 September 2005 at the latest, the period shall expire on 30 September 2006 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 2(1) najkasneje do 30. septembra 2005, prehodno obdobje poteče najkasneje 30. septembra 2006.
Where authorisations shall be withdrawn in accordance with Article 2(3) by 30 June 2007 at the latest, the period shall expire on 31 December 2007 at the latest.
Kadar se registracije odvzamejo v skladu s členom 2(3) najkasneje do 30. junija 2007, prehodno obdobje poteče najkasneje 31. decembra 2007.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/58/EC (OJ L 120, 24.4.2004, p. 26).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/58/ES (UL L 120, 24.4.2004, str. 26)
LIST OF AUTHORISATIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2(2)
SEZNAM REGISTRACIJ IZ ČLENA 2(2)
Column A
Stolpec A
Column B
Stolpec B
Column C
Stolpec C
Moss control in amenity turf and golf greens
Zatiranje mahu na javnih zelenih površinah in igriščih za golf
Liverworts and mosses on ornamentals
Jetrniki in mahovi na okrasnih rastlinah
Control of fungi and other plant pathogens on glasshouses surfaces and in nurseries on crop standing areas
Zatiranje gliv in drugih rastlinskih patogenov na površini rastlinjakov in v nasadih drevesnic
Moss control on managed amenity turf and hard surfaces
Zatiranje mahu na urejenih javnih zelenih in trdih površinah
Prevention of bacterial diseases on tobacco, tomatoes, cucumbers, citrus, beans and ornamentals
Preprečevanje bakterijskih bolezni na tobaku, paradižnikih, kumarah, citrusih, fižolu in okrasnih rastlinah
Pome fruits (apple, pear, quince), sweet pepper, hot pepper, tomato, cucumber
Pečkasto sadje (jabolko, hruška, kutina), sladka paprika, ostra paprika, paradižnik, kumara
Prevention of bacterial diseases on tomatoes, cucumbers, apple and pear trees, cypresses (also fungal diseases), strawberries and French beans
Preprečevanje bakterijskih bolezni na paradižnikih, kumarah, jablanah in hruškah, cipresah (tudi glivične bolezni), jagodah in navadnem fižolu
Prevention of fungal diseases on strawberries
Preprečevanje glivičnih bolezni na jagodah
Prevention of bacterial and fungal diseases on tomatoes, marrows and cucumbers, bushes and herbaceous ornamentals, cotton and raspberry bush
Preprečevanje bakterijskih in glivičnih bolezni na paradižnikih, bučah in kumarah, grmih in zelnatih okrasnih rastlinah, bombažu in malinah
OJ L 224, 21.8.2002, p. 23. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1744/2004 (OJ L 311, 8.10.2004, p. 23).
UL L 224, 21.8.2002, str. 23, Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1744/2004 (UL L 311, 8.10.2004, str. 23).
Kasugamycin
Kasugamicin
Polyoxin
Polioksin
imposing fines on an undertaking for supplying incorrect or misleading information in a notification in a merger control proceeding
o naložitvi glob za podjetje zaradi dajanja nepravilnih ali zavajajočih podatkov v priglasitvi v postopku kontrole združevanja
(Case No COMP/M.3255 — Tetra Laval/Sidel)
(Zadeva št. COMP/M.3255 – Tetra Laval/Sidel)
(notified under document number C(2004) 2500)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 2500)
(Only the English version is authentic)
(Besedilo v angleškem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
On 7 July 2004 the Commission adopted a Decision under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1], and in particular Articles 14(1)(b) and 14(1)(c) of that Regulation.
Komisija je 7. julija 2004 sprejela Odločbo na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 z dne 21. decembra 1989 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij [1] in zlasti člena 14(1)(b) in 14(1)(c) navedene uredbe.
A non confidential version of the full Decision can be found in the authentic language of the case and in the working languages of the Commission on the website of the Directorate General for Competition, at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html
Različica, ki ni zaupna, je na voljo v verodostojnem jeziku zadeve in v delovnih jezikih Komisije na spletni strani Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco na naslednjem naslovu: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.html
I. THE PARTIES
I. STRANKE
(Tetra) of the Netherlands, is a privately held group of companies, which is active in the design and manufacture of equipment, consumables and ancillary services for the processing, packaging and distribution of liquid food.
(„Tetra“) iz Nizozemske je skupina družb v zasebni lasti, ki se ukvarja z načrtovanjem in izdelavo opreme, potrošnega blaga in pomožnih storitev za predelavo, pakiranje in distribucijo prehrane v tekoči obliki.
Sidel S.A., (Sidel) is a French company involved in the design and production of packaging equipment and systems, in particular, stretch blow moulding machinery, barrier technology and filling machines for polyethylene terephthalate plastic bottles (PET bottles).
Sidel S.A. („Sidel“) je francoska družba, ki se ukvarja z načrtovanjem in izdelavo opreme in sistemov za pakiranje, zlasti strojev za raztezno oblikovanje s pihanjem („stretch blow moulding machinery“ – stroji SBM), pregradnih tehnologij in strojev za polnjenje plastenk iz polietilen tereftalata („plastenke PET“).
THE TRANSACTION
TRANSAKCIJA
On 18 May 2001, the Commission received a notification (the Original Notification) pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (the Merger Regulation) of a concentration whereby Tetra acquired within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, control of Sidel by public bid announced on 27 March 2001.
Komisija je 18. maja 2001 prejela priglasitev („prvotna priglasitev“) v skladu s členom 4 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 4064/89 („Uredba o združitvah“) o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij, po kateri je Tetra v smislu člena 3(1)(b) Uredbe o združitvah z javno ponudbo, objavljeno 27. marca 2001, dobila nadzor nad podjetjem Sidel.
After examination of the Original Notification, the Commission concluded that the notified operation fell within the scope of the Merger Regulation and that it raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and the EEA Agreement.
Komisija je po preučitvi prvotne priglasitve sklenila, da priglašeno dejanje spada v področje uporabe Uredbe o združitvah in da vzbuja resne dvome o njegovi združljivosti s skupnim trgom in Sporazumom EGP.
On 5 July 2001, the Commission decided in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation to initiate proceedings in this case.
Komisija se je 5. julija 2001 odločila uvesti postopek v tej zadevi v skladu s členom 6(1)(c) Uredbe o združitvah.
On 30 October 2001, the Commission declared the operation incompatible with the common market, following an in-depth investigation (Tetra I).
Komisija je 30. oktobra 2001 po temeljiti preiskavi razglasila dejanje za nezdružljivo s skupnim trgom („Tetra I“).
By judgment (the Judgment) delivered on 25 October 2002, the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (CFI) annulled the Commission’s Decision in its entirety.
V sodbi („sodba“) z dne 25. oktobra 2002 je Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti („CFI“) v celoti razveljavilo odločitev Komisije.
Following the judgment, the Commission re-commenced its examination of the notified concentration pursuant to Article 10(1) and 10(5) Merger Regulation.
Po sodbi je Komisija ponovno začela pregledovati priglašeno koncentracijo v skladu s členom 10(1) in 10(5) Uredbe o združitvah.
On 13 January 2003, the Commission decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement, pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) and 6(2) of the Merger Regulation subject to full compliance with a commitment and obligations (Tetra II).
Komisija se je 13. januarja 2003 odločila, da ne bo nasprotovala priglašenemu dejanju in ga bo razglasila za združljivega s skupnim trgom in Sporazumom EGS v skladu s členom 6(1)(b) in 6(2) Uredbe o združitvah ob upoštevanju izpolnjevanja vseh obveznosti in zahtev („Tetra II“).
During the examination of the proposed concentration following the judgment of the CFI it became apparent that Tetra had failed to disclose pertinent information regarding the development of Tetra Fast which was being actively pursued, including its potential impact on the conditions of competition in the SBM market.
Med pregledovanjem predlagane koncentracije po sodbi CFI se je izkazalo, da Tetra ni razkrila ustreznih podatkov o razvoju Tetre Fast, ki se je že začel, vključno z morebitnim vplivom na pogoje konkurence na trgu s stroji SBM.
Tetra had failed to disclose such information
Tetra ni razkrila takih podatkov
in the Original Notification of 18 May 2001; and
v prvotni priglasitvi z dne 18. maja 2001; in
in a reply to a request for information made pursuant to Article 11 of the Merger Regulation on 13 July 2001 (the Article 11 Reply).
v odgovoru na zahtevek za podatke v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe o združitvah z dne 13. julija 2001 („odgovor na člen 11“).
The Tetra Fast technology is a technology developed and patented by Tetra.
Tehnologija Tetra Fast je tehnologija, ki jo je razvila in patentirala Tetra.
It allows stretch blow moulding machines (SBM machines) to blow plastic PET bottles through a new method using explosive materials.
Strojem za raztezno oblikovanje s pihanjem („stroji SBM“) omogoča pihanje plastenk PET po novi metodi z uporabo eksplozivnih materialov.
The commercial advantages of this new method are significant as found by the Commission in Tetra II, which explained (at point 63) that: ‘… the technology appears to offer a range of economic, operational and environmental advantages over conventional stretch blow moulding’.
Da so poslovne prednosti te nove metode precejšnje, je ugotovila Komisija v postopku Tetre II, ki je v točki 63 razložila, da: „… izgleda, da tehnologija nudi niz gospodarskih, praktičnih in okoljskih prednosti v primerjavi z običajnim razteznim oblikovanjem s pihanjem“.
The Commission discovered the existence of Tetra Fast for the first time several months after the adoption of Tetra I. The matter came to the Commission's attention through the monitoring work of the Commission’s Trustee.
Komisija je prvič odkrila obstoj Tetra Fast več mesecev po sprejetju Tetre I. Zadeva je pritegnila pozornost Komisije na podlagi spremljanja s strani pooblaščenca Komisije.
Tetra subsequently disclosed information on Tetra Fast during the Tetra II proceedings.
Tetra je posledično razkrila podatke o Tetri Fast v postopkih Tetra II.
Tetra's failure to disclose the relevant information falls within Article 14(1)(b) and (c) of the Merger Regulation which provides that the Commission may impose fines of EUR 1000 to 50000 on undertakings where intentionally or negligently they supply incorrect or misleading information in a notification or where they supply incorrect information in response to a request made pursuant to Article 11.
Nerazkritje pomembnih podatkov s strani podjetja Tetra spada v člen 14(1)(b) in (c) Uredbe o združitvah, ki določa, da lahko Komisija naloži globe v višini od 1000 do 50000 EUR podjetjem, ki v priglasitvi namerno ali iz malomarnosti navedejo nepravilne ali zavajajoče podatke, ali ki navedejo nepravilne podatke v odgovoru na zahtevek v skladu s členom 11.
The infringements on which the Commission bases the fines decision are:
Kršitve, na podlagi katerih Komisija z odločbo naloži globe, so:
infringement of Article 14(1)(b) Merger Regulation due to Tetra’s failure to disclose the Tetra Fast technology in Section 8.10 of Form CO requiring the disclosure of R&D in affected markets;
kršitev člena 14(1)(b) Uredbe o združitvah zaradi nerazkritja tehnologije Tetra Fast s strani podjetja Tetra v oddelku 8.10 obrazca CO, ki zahteva razkritje R&R na prizadetih trgih;
infringement of Article 14(1)(c) Merger Regulation due to Tetra’s failure to disclose the Tetra Fast technology in replying to the Commission’s Article 11 request of 13 July 2001 in which:
kršitev člena 14(1)(c) Uredbe o združitvah zaradi nerazkritja tehnologije Tetra Fast s strani podjetja Tetra v odgovoru na zahtevek Komisije v skladu s členom 11 z dne 13. julija 2001, v katerem:
question 4 requested Tetra to describe developments regarding PET packaging for juice and liquid dairy products (LDP) (Tetra knew about the aseptic quality of Tetra Fast which is of particular relevance to packaging juice and LDP); and
se v vprašanju 4 od Tetre zahteva, naj opiše razvoj v zvezi z embalažo PET za sokove in tekoče mlečne izdelke („TMI“) (Tetra je vedela za aseptično značilnost Tetra Fast, ki je posebnega pomena za pakiranje sokov in TMI); in
question 5 asked for ongoing development in PET barrier technologies (Tetra had filed a coating patent based on the Tetra Fast technology).
se v vprašanju 5 poizveduje o razvoju v teku na področju pregradne tehnologije PET (Tetra je izpolnila patent za prevleko na podlagi tehnologije Tetra Fast).
Tetra’s infringements are particularly serious as the information was important for the Commission’s assessment and Tetra ought to have known of this importance.
Kršitve Tetre so posebej resne, saj so bili ti podatki pomembni za oceno Komisije, in Tetra se je morala zavedati tega pomena.
Had the Tetra Fast information been disclosed during the Commission’s Tetra I proceedings, it would have been an important element to the Commission’s assessment.
V kolikor bi bili podatki o tehnologiji Tetra Fast razkriti med postopkom Komisije za Tetra I, bi to bil pomemben element za oceno Komisije.