natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in mm measured at 6 cm off the midline of the carcase between the third and fourth last rib;
debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v mm, merjena 6 cm od vzdolžne osi trupa med zadnjim 3. in 4. rebrom;
the thickness of muscle in mm measured at the same time and the same place as X2.
debelina mišice v mm, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kakor X2.
The formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 51 and 120 kilograms.’
Enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 51 in 120 kilogrami.“
Point 3 of Part 2 is replaced by the following:
Točka 3 dela 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The lean meat content of the carcase shall be calculated according to the following formula:
Delež mesnatosti trupa se izračuna po naslednji enačbi:
the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in mm measured at 6 cm off the midline of the carcase between the third and fourth last rib.
debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v mm, merjena 6 cm od vzdolžne osi trupa med zadnjim tretjim in četrtim rebrom.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Finland.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Finsko.
OJ L 236, 18.9.1996, p. 47.
UL L 236, 18.9.1996, str. 47.
Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 3127/94 (OJ L 330, 21.12.1994, p. 43).
Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 3127/94 (UL L 330, 21.12.1994, str. 43).
accepting an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of polyester staple fibre originating, inter alia, in Saudi Arabia
o sprejetju zaveze, ponujene v zvezi s protidampinškimi postopki pri uvozu poliestrskega rezanega vlakna s poreklom iz, med drugim, Saudove Arabije
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNIITES,
KOMISIJA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI JE –
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community [1] (the basic Regulation), and in particular Articles 8 and 9 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 384/96 z dne 22. decembra 1995 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti [1] (osnovna uredba), in zlasti členov 8 in 9 Uredbe,
The Council, by Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 [2] (the definitive Regulation), imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of polyester staple fibre (PSF) originating in the People’s Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amended the definitive anti-dumping duties in force on such imports originating in South Korea and terminated the anti-dumping proceeding in respect to such imports originating in Taiwan.
Svet je z Uredbo (ES) št. 428/2005 [2] („končna uredba“) uvedel dokončne protidampinške dajatve na uvoz poliestrskega rezanega vlakna s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Saudove Arabije, spremenil dokončne protidampinške dajatve, ki veljajo za uvoz tega izdelka s poreklom iz Južne Koreje, in zaključil protidampinški postopek v zvezi z uvozom tega izdelka s poreklom iz Tajvana.
Following disclosure of definitive findings, Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Sabic) presented to the Commission services, within the deadlines stipulated, an offer for price undertaking as well as a revised offer thereon, on its behalf and of all related companies, including the related producer of the product concerned Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd).
Na podlagi razkritja dokončnih ugotovitev je Saudi Basic Industries Corporation („Sabic“) v določenih rokih službam Komisije predložil ponudbo, da se zaveže glede cene in tudi popravljeno ponudbo o tem v svojem imenu in v imenu vseh povezanih družb, vključno s povezanim proizvajalcem zadevnega izdelka Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd).
This undertaking offer was not accepted due to the reasons set out in recital 292 of the definitive Regulation.
Ta ponujena zaveza ni bila sprejeta zaradi razlogov, navedenih v uvodni izjavi (292) končne uredbe.
In particular, the minimum prices originally offered by Sabic did not eliminate the injurious effect of dumping.
Zlasti najnižje cene, ki jih je prvotno ponudil Sabic, ni odpravljala škodljivega učinka dampinga.
In addition, the sales structure of this company in the Community was such that it did not allow an effective monitoring of the undertaking.
Poleg tega je bila prodajna struktura te družbe v Skupnosti taka, da ni omogočala učinkovitega spremljanja izvajanja zaveze.
Subsequent meetings between Sabic’s representatives and the Commission services then resulted in substantial revisions to the undertaking offer that overcame the above problems.
Rezultati nadaljnjih sestankov med predstavniki Sabica in službami Komisije so privedli do bistvenih popravkov ponujene zaveze, ki so presegli zgoraj navedene probleme.
The revised offer not only eliminated the injurious effect of dumping but also limited to a satisfactory degree the risk of circumvention in the form of cross-compensation with other products.
Popravljena ponudba ni le odstranila škodljivega učinka dampinga, ampak je zadovoljivo omejila stopnjo tveganja izogibanja v obliki navzkrižne kompenzacije z drugimi izdelki.
In addition, the company amended its channels of sale in the Community to the extent that it was considered possible for the Commission to effectively monitor the undertaking.
Poleg tega je družba tako spremenila svoje prodajne poti v Skupnosti, da bo Komisija lahko učinkovito spremljala izvajanje zaveze.
The final acceptable offer of a price undertaking was made by Sabic prior to the publication of the definitive findings, but at such a late stage in the proceeding that it was administratively impossible to include its acceptance in the definitive Regulation.
Končno sprejemljivo zavezo glede cene je Sabic ponudil pred objavo dokončnih ugotovitev, vendar tako pozno v postopku, da je bilo njeno sprejetje s tehničnega vidika nemogoče vključiti v končno uredbo.
The Community industry was informed of this revised offer and maintained that acceptance of a price undertaking would allow such imports to continue to cause serious injury to European producers, due to the cyclical nature of polyester staple fibre pricing.
Industrija Skupnosti je bila obveščena o tej popravljeni ponudbi in je trdila, da bi sprejetje zaveze glede cene dopuščalo, da bi tak uvoz zaradi ciklične narave oblikovanja cen poliestrskega rezanega vlakna še naprej povzročal resno škodo evropskim proizvajalcem.
In this regard, it should be noted that the final offer made foresees the indexation of the minimum prices of PSF to public international quotations of its main raw materials, i.e. PTA and MEG.
Glede tega je treba opozoriti, da končna ponudba predvideva indeksacijo najnižjih cen poliestrskega rezanega vlakna v skladu z javnimi mednarodnimi kotacijami njegovih glavnih surovin, tj. prečiščene tereftalne kisline in monoetilenglikola.
Consequently, the cyclical nature of PSF prices, which mainly reflects changes in the prices of its raw materials, is addressed in a way which reasonably eliminates the risk that the injurious dumping continues.
Posledično se ciklična narava cen poliestrskega rezanega vlakna, ki v glavnem odraža spremembe v cenah njegovih surovin, obravnava na način, ki razumno odpravlja tveganje nadaljevanja škodljivega dampinga.
Finally, the undertaking offer foresees reporting also on products other than PSF sold to the same clients by Sabic related customers in the Community.
Ponujena zaveza predvideva tudi poročanje o drugih izdelkih poleg poliestrskega rezanega vlakna, ki jih s Sabicom povezani odjemalci v Skupnosti prodajajo istim strankam.
Therefore, the risk of cross-compensation with other products is to a great extent eliminated.
Zato je tveganje navzkrižne kompenzacije z ostalimi proizvodi v veliki meri odpravljeno.
Consequently, none of the arguments brought forward by the Community industry alters the Commission’s conclusion that the undertaking offered by Sabic eliminates the injurious effect of dumping and limits to a sufficient degree the risk of circumvention in the form of cross-compensation with other products.
Posledično noben od argumentov industrije Skupnosti ne spreminja sklepne ugotovitve Komisije, da zaveza, ki jo je ponudil Sabic, odpravlja škodljiv učinek dampinga in zadostno omejuje stopnjo tveganja izogibanja v obliki navzkrižne kompenzacije z ostalimi proizvodi.
In view of the foregoing, the Commission considers that the undertaking offered by Sabic, which includes an indexation of the minimum prices to public quotations of its main raw materials, can be accepted since it eliminates the injurious effects of dumping.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno Komisija meni, da se zaveza, ki jo je ponudil Sabic in ki vključuje indeksacijo najnižjih cen v skladu z javnimi kotacijami njegovih glavnih surovin, lahko sprejme, ker odpravlja škodljiv učinek dampinga.
Moreover, the regular and detailed reports which the company undertook to provide to the Commission will allow effective monitoring, and the risk of circumvention of the undertaking is limited,
Poleg tega bodo redna in natančna poročila, za katere se je družba obvezala, da jih bo priskrbela Komisiji, omogočala učinkovito spremljanje, omejeno pa je tveganje izogibanju zavezi –
The undertaking offered by the companies mentioned below, in connection with the anti-dumping proceeding concerning polyester staple fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, is hereby accepted.
Zaveza, ki jo ponujajo spodaj navedene družbe v zvezi s protidampinškimi postopki pri rezanih vlaknih iz poliestra s poreklom iz Ljudske republike Kitajske in Saudove Arabije, se sprejme.
Produced and sold by Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd), Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah, or produced by Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd), Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah, and sold by Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Sabic), Riyadh, to the first customer in the Community acting as an importer
Proizvaja in prodaja Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd), Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah ali proizvaja Arabian Industrial Fibres Company (Ibn Rushd), Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah in prodaja Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (Sabic), Riad prvemu odjemalcu v Skupnosti, ki nastopa kot uvoznik.
OJ L 71, 17.3.2005, p. 1.
UL L 71, 17.3.2005, str. 1.
of 16 August 2005
z dne 16. avgusta 2005
amending Annex XI to Council Directive 2003/85/EC with regard to national laboratories in certain Member States
o spremembi Priloge XI k Direktivi Sveta 2003/85/ES glede nacionalnih laboratorijev v nekaterih državah članicah
(notified under document number C(2005) 3121)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 3121)
Having regard to Council Directive 2003/85/EC of 29 September 2003 on Community measures for the control of foot-and-mouth disease repealing Directive 85/511/EEC and Decisions 89/531/EEC and 91/665/EEC and amending Directive 92/46/EEC [1], and in particular Article 67(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2003/85/ES z dne 29. septembra 2003 o ukrepih Skupnosti za obvladovanje slinavke in parkljevke, ki razveljavljajo Direktivo 85/511/EGS in odločbi 89/531/EGS in 91/665/EGS ter spreminja Direktivo 92/46/EGS [1] in zlasti člena 67(2) Direktive,
For security reasons it is important to maintain the list of national laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus updated.
Iz varnostnih razlogov je pomembno vzdrževati posodobljen seznam nacionalnih laboratorijev, pooblaščenih za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in parkljevke.
The competent authorities of Denmark, Germany and Poland have officially informed the Commission on changes relating to their national reference laboratory for foot-and-mouth disease.
Pristojni danski, nemški in poljski organi so uradno obvestili Komisijo o spremembah v zvezi s svojim nacionalnim referenčnim laboratorijem za slinavko in parkljevko.
The competent authorities of Slovakia officially informed the Commission of arrangements they have made in accordance with Article 68(2) of the Directive.
Pristojni slovaški organi so uradno obvestili Komisijo o sporazumih, sklenjenih skladno s členom 68(2) Direktive.
For clarity it appears appropriate to list the Member States in the order of the ISO country code.
Zaradi jasnosti se zdi primerno uvrstiti države članice na seznam glede na oznako države ISO.
It is necessary to adapt the list of national laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus and to amend Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC accordingly.
Zato je treba takoj prilagoditi seznam nacionalnih laboratorijev, pooblaščenih za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in prakljevke ter spremeniti del A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES.
The list of National laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus in Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Decision.
Seznam nacionalnih laboratorijev, pooblaščenih za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in parkljevke, v delu A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/ES se nadomesti z besedilom iz Priloge k tej odločbi.
The Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na države članice.
Done at Brussels, 16 August 2005.
V Bruslju, 16. avgusta 2005
The list of national laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus in Part A of Annex XI to Directive 2003/85/EC is replaced by the following:
Seznam nacionalnih laboratorijev, pooblaščenih za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in parkljevke v delu A Priloge XI k Direktivi 2003/85/EGS se nadomesti z besedilom:
‘National laboratories authorised to handle live foot-and-mouth disease virus
„Nacionalni laboratoriji pooblaščeni za ravnanje z živim virusom slinavke in parkljevke
Member State where laboratory is situated
Država članica, v kateri je laboratorij
Member States using the services of laboratory
Države članice, ki uporabljajo storitve laboratorija
Slovenia’
Slovenija“
of 17 August 2005
z dne 17. avgusta 2005
on the monitoring and evaluation of the labour rights situation in Belarus for temporary withdrawal of trade preferences
o spremljanju in ocenitvi položaja delavskih pravic v Belorusiji za začasni preklic trgovinskih preferencialov
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 — Statements on a Council Regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 [1], and in particular Articles 26 and 29 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 z dne 10. decembra 2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 [1] in zlasti členov 26 in 29 Uredbe,
The tariff preferences granted under Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 may be temporarily withdrawn in whole or in part in circumstances including serious and systematic violation of the freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining as defined in the relevant Conventions of the International Labour Organisation (ILO).
Tarifni preferenciali, odobreni z Uredbo (ES) št. 2501/2001, se lahko v okoliščinah, ki vključujejo resne in sistematične kršitve svobode združevanja ter pravice do kolektivnega pogajanja, kakor sta opredeljeni v ustreznih konvencijah mednarodne organizacije dela (MOD), v celoti ali delno začasno prekličejo.
Pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 the Republic of Belarus (hereafter referred to as Belarus) is a beneficiary of generalised tariff preferences.
V skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 2501/2001 je Republika Belorusija (v nadaljnjem besedilu „Belorusija“) država upravičenka v okviru splošnih tarifnih preferencialov.
On 29 January 2003, the Commission received information from the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and the World Confederation of Labour (WCL) on alleged systematic and serious violations of freedom of association in Belarus as defined in ILO Conventions Nos 87 and 98.
Komisija je 29. januarja 2003 od Mednarodne zveze svobodnih sindikatov (ICFTU), Evropske zveze sindikatov (ETUC) in Svetovne delavske zveze (WCL) prejela informacijo o domnevnih sistematičnih in resnih kršitvah svobode združevanja v Belorusiji, kakor je opredeljena v Konvencijah MOD št. 87 in 98.
The information put forward was sufficient to justify the opening of an investigation and therefore the Commission decided by a Decision of 29 December 2003 [2] that an investigation should take place.
Predložena informacija je zadostovala za začetek preiskave in zato je Komisija s Sklepom z dne 29. decembra 2003 [2] odločila, da je treba začeti s preiskavo.
The Belarusian authorities were associated with the investigation.
Beloruski organi so bili vključeni v preiskavo.
The written and oral statements collected by the Commission during the course of the investigation corroborate the allegations contained in the information submitted earlier.
Pisne in ustne izjave, ki jih je Komisija zbrala med preiskavo, podpirajo obtožbe, vsebovane v prej predloženi informaciji.
Belarus is violating the ILO Convention No 87 on Freedom of Association on various major points by impeding the right to freely establish trade union organisations, the right to organise, the free choice of trade union organisations and the obtaining of legal personality of these organisations.
Belorusija z oviranjem pravice do svobodne ustanovitve sindikalnih organizacij, pravice do organiziranja, svobodne izbire sindikalne organizacije in pridobitve statusa pravne osebe teh organizacij v več pomembnih točkah krši Konvencijo MOD št. 87 o svobodi združevanja.
Belarus impedes the functioning of trade union organisations, including their reception of financial assistance from international affiliation, and promotes dissolution or suspension of trade unions.
Belorusija ovira delovanje sindikalnih organizacij, vključno s sprejemanjem finančne pomoči s strani mednarodnih sindikalnih organizacij, in podpira razpad ali opustitev sindikatov.
The Government of Belarus is also violating Convention No 98 (1949) on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining through anti-union discrimination.
Vlada Belorusije s protisindikalno diskriminacijo krši tudi Konvencijo 98 (1949) o pravici do organiziranja in kolektivnega pogajanja.
The information available thus provides sufficient grounds to conclude that these violations are serious and systematic and that withdrawal of Belarus’ access to the scheme of generalised preferences is justified.
Na podlagi dostopne informacije je na voljo dovolj razlogov za sklep, da so kršitve resne in sistematične ter da je preklic upravičenosti Belorusije do sheme splošnih preferencialov upravičen.
A report on the findings of the investigation was submitted to the Generalised Preferences Committee.
Poročilo o ugotovitvah preiskave je bilo predloženo Odboru za splošne preferenciale.
In the light of the foregoing, the Commission shall monitor and evaluate the situation with regard to labour rights in Belarus for a period of six months.
V zvezi s prej omenjenim bo Komisija v obdobju šestih mesecev spremljala in ocenila položaj delavskih pravic v Belorusiji.
After the expiry of that period, the Commission intends to submit a proposal to the Council for temporary withdrawal of the trade preferences unless, before the end of the period, Belarus has made a commitment to take the measures necessary to conform within eight months with the principles referred to in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.
Po preteku navedenega obdobja namerava Komisija Svetu predložiti predlog za začasni preklic trgovinskih preferencialov, razen če se Belorusija zaveže sprejeti potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bo v osmih mesecih zagotovila uskladitev z načeli iz Deklaracije MOD iz leta 1998 o temeljnih načelih in pravicah pri delu.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Generalised Preferences Committee,
Ukrepi, predvideni s tem sklepom, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za splošne preferenciale –
The Commission shall monitor and evaluate the situation in Belarus with regard to ILO conventions Nos 87 and 98 for a period of six months from the publication date of an announcement on the monitoring and evaluation period in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija v obdobju šestih mesecev od datuma objave napovedi o obdobju spremljanja in ocenitve v Uradnem listu Evropske unije spremlja in oceni položaj v Belorusiji glede Konvencij MOD št. 87 in 98.
In that announcement, the Commission will call upon Belarus to make a commitment, before the end of the period of six months, to take the measures necessary to conform, within eight months, with the principles referred to in the 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, as expressed in the 12 recommendations of the ILO Commission of Enquiry report of July 2004.
V tej napovedi bo Komisija pozvala Belorusijo, naj se zaveže, da bo še pred koncem obdobja šestih mesecev sprejela potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bo v osmih mesecih zagotovila uskladitev z načeli iz Deklaracije MOD iz leta 1998 o temeljnih načelih in pravicah pri delu, kot so bila izražena v dvanajstih priporočilih poročila Preiskovalne komisije MOD iz julija 2004.
Unless Belarus makes such a commitment, the Commission intends to submit, after the expiry of the six-month period referrred to in paragraph 1, a proposal to the Council for temporary withdrawal of the trade preferences granted under Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001.
Če Belorusija take zaveze ne sprejme, namerava Komisija Svetu po preteku obdobja šestih mesecev, navedenega v odstavku 1, predložiti predlog za začasni preklic trgovinskih preferencialov, odobrenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001.
Done at Brussels, 17 August 2005.
V Bruslju, 17. avgusta 2005
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 (OJ L 169, 30.6.2005, p. 1).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 980/2005 (UL L 169, 30.6.2005, str. 1).
OJ L 5, 9.1.2004, p. 90.
UL L 5, 9.1.2004, str. 90.
temporarily recognising the systems for identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals in Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United Kingdom, according to Article 4(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004
o začasnem priznanju sistemov za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz v Veliki Britaniji in Severni Irski (Združenem kraljestvu) v skladu s členom 4(2)(d) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 21/2004
(notified under document number C(2005) 3122)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 3122)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC [1], and in particular Article 4(2)(d) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 21/2004 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz ter o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 in direktiv 92/102/EGS in 64/432/EGS [1] in zlasti člena 4(2)(d) Uredbe,
The competent authority of the United Kingdom has submitted two requests, accompanied by appropriate documentation, for the recognition of the system of identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals implemented in Great Britain and Northern Ireland respectively.
Pristojni organ Združenega kraljestva je predložil dve zahtevi z ustrezno dokumentacijo za priznanje sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz, ki se izvaja v Veliki Britaniji in Severni Irski.
Following a Commission veterinary inspection mission in the United Kingdom the Commission experts found that in Great Britain the systems of identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals in place and proposed are generally speaking capable of ensuring compliance with most of the objectives laid down in Regulation (EC) No 21/2004, but a number of weaknesses need to be addressed.
Po veterinarskem inšpekcijskem pregledu Komisije v Združenem kraljestvu so strokovnjaki Komisije ugotovili, da so obstoječi in predlagani sistemi za identifikacijo in registracijo ovc in koz v Veliki Britaniji na splošno sposobni zagotavljati skladnost z večino ciljev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 21/2004, treba pa je preučiti vrsto pomanjkljivosti.