natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
amending Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP on the Mediterranean region in order to extend the period of its application
o spremembi Skupne strategije 2000/458/SZVP o sredozemskem območju zaradi podaljšanja njene veljavnosti
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Article 13(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti člena 13(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the recommendation of the Council,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta,
Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP of the European Council of 19 June 2000 on the Mediterranean region [1]expired on 23 July 2004.
Skupna strategija 2000/458/SZVP Evropskega sveta z dne 19. junija 2000 o sredozemskem območju [1] je prenehala veljati 23. julija 2004.
It is considered necessary to amend Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP in order to extend the period of its application, thereby allowing for a review of the European Union's relations with the Mediterranean Region, taking into consideration the evaluation of the Strategic Partnership with the Mediterranean and the Middle East by the European Council in June 2005 and the evaluation of the Barcelona Process in the framework of its 10th anniversary in 2005, as well as the evolution of the European Neighbourhood Policy during that period,
Skupno strategijo 2000/458/SZVP je treba spremeniti zaradi podaljšanja njene veljavnosti, kar bo omogočilo preučitev odnosov Evropske unije s sredozemskim območjem z upoštevanjem razvoja Strateškega partnerstva s Sredozemljem in Bližnjim vzhodom, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet junija 2004, in oceno Barcelonskega procesa v okviru njegove desete obletnice leta 2005, kakor tudi razvoja Evropske sosedske politike v tem obdobju –
In Part V of Common Strategy 2000/458/CFSP, the first sentence of point 36 (Duration) shall be replaced by the following:
V Delu V Skupne strategije 2000/458/SZVP se prvi stavek točke 36 („Veljavnost“) nadomesti z naslednjim:
This Common Strategy shall apply until 23 January 2006.’
Ta skupna strategija se uporablja do 23. januarja 2006.“
OJ L 183, 22.7.2000, p. 5.
UL L 183, 22.7.2000, str. 5.
For the European Council
Za Evropski svet
of 22 October 2004
z dne 22. oktobra 2004
concerning an extension of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to certain bovine animals kept in nature reserves in the Netherlands
o podaljšanju skrajnega roka za pritrditev ušesnih znamk na določena goveda v naravnih rezervatih na Nizozemskem
(notified under document number C(2004) 4013)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 4013)
(Only the Dutch text is authentic)
(Besedilo v nizozemskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 [1], and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1760/2000 z dne 17. julija 2000 o uvedbi sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo govedi ter o označevanju govejega mesa in proizvodov iz govejega mesa in razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 820/97 [1] ter zlasti člena 4(2) Uredbe,
Having regard to the request submitted by the Netherlands,
ob upoštevanju prošnje, ki jo je predložila Nizozemska,
The Netherlands have requested an extension to 12 months of the maximum period laid down for the application of eartags to bovine animals in nature reserves, due to practical difficulties.
Nizozemska je zaradi praktičnih težav zaprosila za podaljšanje skrajnega roka za pritrditev ušesnih znamk na določena goveda v naravnih rezervatih na 12 mesecev.
Those animals are primarily kept for the purpose of nature protection and landscape conservation and not for production purposes.
Te živali so v rezervatih predvsem zaradi varstva okolja ter ohranjanja krajine in ne v proizvodne namene.
They are kept under extensive holding conditions and in free range where calves stay always close to their mother.
Živijo v ekstenzivnih pogojih in v prosti reji, pri čemer so teleta vedno blizu svoje mame.
It is justified to take account of the Dutch request, provided that the extension of the maximum period for tagging does not affect the quality of information provided by the Dutch database for bovine animals and that there is no movement of bovine animals to which eartags have not been applied.
Upoštevanje prošnje Nizozemske je upravičeno pod pogojem, da podaljšanje skrajnega roka za označevanje ne vpliva na kakovost informacij, ki jih zagotavlja nizozemska podatkovna baza za govedo, in da ne prihaja do premika goveda brez ušesnih znamk.
In the case of animals, which have not been tagged until the age of 6 months, the identity of the mother should be verified by a DNA test.
V primeru živali, ki niso označene do starosti šestih mesecev, je potrebno preveriti identiteto matere s testom DNK.
Taking this additional guarantee into account the maximum period for tagging should not be longer than 12 months.
Ob upoštevanju tega dodatnega jamstva skrajni rok za označevanje ne sme biti daljši od dvanajstih mesecev.
This derogation should be strictly restricted to a limited number of holdings, which have been separately authorised according to defined criteria as nature reserves and communicated to the Commission.
To odstopanje mora biti strogo omejeno na določeno število posesti, ki so v skladu z opredeljenimi merili posamično pooblaščene kot naravni rezervati, pri čemer se o tem obvesti Komisijo.
The Dutch authorities undertake not to extend this derogation to the identification and registration system of bovine animals.
Nizozemske oblasti se obvežejo, da tega odstopanja ne bodo razširile na sistem identifikacije in registracije goveda.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Odbora za Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad –
The Netherlands may extend to 12 months the maximum period laid down by Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000, for the application of eartags to calves kept in certain nature reserves provided all the conditions set out in this Decision are met.
Nizozemska lahko podaljša na dvanajst mesecev skrajni rok, določen v členu 4(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000, za pritrditev ušesnih znamk na teleta v določenih naravnih rezervatih, če so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji iz te odločbe.
This extension shall not affect the quality of information provided by the computerised bovine database.
Podaljšanje ne vpliva na kakovost informacij, ki jih zagotavlja računalniška podatkovna baza za govedo.
The extension provided in Article 1 shall be allowed subject to all the conditions set out in paragraph 2 to 5.
Podaljšanje iz člena 1 se dovoli ob upoštevanju vseh pogojev iz odstavkov 2 do 5.
The animals shall be born in a nature reserve authorised by the competent authority in accordance with Article 3.
Te živali so skotene v naravnih rezervatih, pooblaščenih s strani pristojnega organa v skladu s členom 3.
The birth of each calf shall be reported to the competent authority within a period to be fixed by the Netherlands in accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000.
O vsaki telitvi se obvesti pristojni organ v obdobju, ki ga določi Nizozemska v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe (ES) št. 1760/2000.
The eartags shall be applied before the calves are 12 months old.
Ušesne znamke se pritrdi, preden teleta dosežejo starost dvanajstih mesecev.
In any case no animals shall leave the nature reserve without prior application of the eartags.
Živali ne smejo v nobenem primeru zapustiti naravnega rezervata pred pritrditvijo ušesnih znamk.
For calves tagged later than 6 months of age the identity of the mother shall be verified on the basis of a DNA-test when the eartags are applied.
Pri teletih, ki so označena po starosti šestih mesecev, se ob pritrditvi ušesnih znamk preveri identiteta matere na podlagi testa DNK.
The competent authority may authorise nature reserves for the purpose of this Decision if they fulfil the following conditions:
Pristojni organ lahko pooblasti naravne rezervate za namen te odločbe, če izpolnjujejo naslednje pogoje:
the nature reserve is a holding where animals are primarily kept for the purpose of nature protection and landscape conservation;
Naravni rezervat je posest, kjer so živali predvsem zaradi varstva okolja in ohranjanja krajine.
the nature reserve covers a territory of at least 100 ha;
Naravni rezervat pokriva območje vsaj 100 hektarjev.
the effective livestock density is below 0,5 animals over 12 months of age per hectare, on an annual average basis;
Dejanska gostota naseljenosti živine je pod 0,5 več kot dvanajst mesecev starih živali na hektar, na osnovi letnega povprečja.
the animals are reared at liberty in a totally extensive system, with the calves staying with their mother.
Živali so v prosti reji v povsem ekstenzivnem sistemu, pri čemer teleta ostanejo pri svoji mami.
The status of a holding as an authorised nature reserve with an extended period for tagging shall be clearly stated in the records of the computerised bovine database.
Status posesti kot pooblaščenega naravnega rezervata s podaljšanim rokom za označevanje je jasno naveden v računalniški podatkovni bazi za govedo.
The competent authority shall communicate to the Commission the list of nature reserves which have been authorised according to paragraph 1.
Pristojni organ posreduje Komisiji seznam naravnih rezervatov, pooblaščenih v skladu z odstavkom 1.
Done at Brussels, 22 October 2004.
V Bruslju, 22. oktobra 2004
concerning a draft Regulation from the Federal Republic of Germany on the labelling of fruit, vegetables and potatoes treated after harvesting
o osnutku Uredbe Zvezne republike Nemčije o označevanju sadja, zelenjave in krompirja, obdelanih po spravilu
(notified under document number C(2004) 4029)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 4029)
(Only the German text is authentic)
(Samo nemška različica je verodostojna)
Having regard to Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs [1], and in particular Articles 19 and 20 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/13/ES z dne 20. marca 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o označevanju, predstavljanju in oglaševanju živil [1], in zlasti členov 19 in 20 Direktive,
In accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 19(2) of Directive 2000/13/EC, the German authorities notified the Commission on 1 March 2004 of a draft Regulation amending the Regulation on maximum residue limits, with a view to adding to it specific provisions on the compulsory labelling of fruit, vegetables and potatoes treated with plant protection substances after harvesting for the purpose of preservation.
V skladu s postopkom, predvidenem v členu 19(2) Direktive 2000/13/ES, so pristojni nemški organi 1. marca 2004 uradno obvestili Komisijo o osnutku uredbe, ki spreminja uredbo o mejnih vrednostih ostankov z namenom dodajanja posebnih določb o obveznem označevanju sadja, zelenjave in krompirja, ki so bili po spravilu zaradi ohranitve izpostavljeni obdelavi s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi.
Pursuant to the new Article 3a added by the aforementioned draft Regulation, directions on the labels of fruit, vegetables or potatoes treated after harvesting should state ‘treated after harvesting with …’ followed by the name of the substance.
Z uporabo novega člena 3a, dodanega z osnutkom prej navedene uredbe, bi moralo označevanje sadja, zelenjave ali krompirja, ki so bili obdelani po spravilu, vsebovati oznako „po spravilu obdelan z ...“, ki ji sledi ime snovi.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 19(2) of Directive 2000/13/EC, the Commission consulted the other Member States via the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health.
V skladu z določbami iz člena 19(2) Direktive 2000/13/ES se je Komisija v okviru Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali posvetovala z drugimi državami članicami.
Community law already contains certain provisions to ensure that the use of these substances does not present a risk to consumers’ health.
Zakonodaja Skupnosti že vsebuje nekatere določbe, ki so namenjene temu, da uporaba zadevnih snovi ne predstavlja nevarnosti za zdravje porabnikov.
These substances have to be authorised, pursuant to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market [2], and maximum levels for residues are established in accordance with Council Directive 90/642/EEC of 27 November 1990 on the fixing of maximum levels for pesticide residues in and on certain products of plant origin, including fruit and vegetables [3].
Na podlagi Direktive Sveta 91/414/EGS z dne 15. julija 1991 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet [2], je po eni strani te snovi potrebno dovoliti, po drugi strani pa so mejne vrednosti ostankov določene v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 90/642/EGS z dne 27. novembra 1990 o določitvi najvišjih dovoljenih vrednosti ostankov pesticidov v in na nekaterih proizvodih kmetijskega izvora, vključno s sadjem in zelenjavo [3].
Furthermore, in some cases, it may be useful for consumers to be informed, by means of a specific warning on the label, where foodstuffs have been treated after harvesting so that they can choose between products which have been treated and those which have not or take precautions such as washing or peeling the products.
V določenih primerih je lahko za porabnike še dodatno koristno, da so z opombo na embalaži obveščeni o obdelavi po spravilu, in lahko tako izbirajo med obdelanimi in neobdelanimi izdelki, ali pa sprejmejo previdnostne ukrepe kot so pranje ali lupljenje izdelkov.
This type of measure is already in place for citrus fruit under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1799/2001 [4], in particular because of the method for calculating the maximum residue levels which, for these products, takes into account that they are normally consumed peeled.
Ta vrsta ukrepa sicer pri agrumih obstaja na podlagi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1799/2001 [4] zlasti zaradi načina izračuna mejnih vrednosti ostankov, ki za te izdelke upošteva dejstvo, da jih porabniki običajno olupijo.
However, such a measure applied unilaterally and indiscriminately by Germany in respect of all fruit and vegetables would be sure to hinder intra-Community trade to a disproportionate extent.
Vendar bi takšen ukrep, ki bi ga Nemčija enostransko in brez razlike uporabljala za vse sadje in zelenjavo, zanesljivo nesorazmerno oviral trgovino znotraj Skupnosti.
It would oblige producers or operators in other Member States to provide specific labelling for fruit, vegetables and potatoes imported into Germany and to take measures to this effect right from the start of the production process, depending on the destination of the products.
Njegova uvedba bi od proizvajalcev ali ponudnikov iz drugih držav članic od začetka pridelave glede na končni cilj izdelkov zahtevala posebno označevanje za sadje, zelenjavo in krompir, ki bi ga uvozili v Nemčijo, ter sprejetje ustreznih določb.
The cases where non-harmonised national provisions governing the labelling and presentation of certain foodstuffs or foodstuffs in general may be acceptable are listed limitatively in Article 18(2) of Directive 2000/13/EC.
Primeri, v katerih se lahko sprejmejo neusklajene nacionalne določbe, ki urejajo označevanje in predstavitev določenih živil ali živil na splošno, so določno našteti v členu 18(2) Direktive 2000/13/ES.
Apart from cases relating to the protection of public health, such measures may be admissible only where justified for the prevention of fraud or the protection of industrial and commercial property rights, indications of provenance, registered designations of origin and prevention of unfair competition.
Razen v primerih, ko bi bili ukrepi potrebni za zaščito javnega zdravja, ti ne morejo biti dovoljeni, razen če so utemeljeni z razlogi preprečevanja prevar, ali varstva pravic industrijske in poslovne lastnine, navedb porekla, registriranih označb porekla in preprečevanja nelojalne konkurence.
Germany has not provided any evidence that the draft Regulation is necessary to attain one of the objectives of the abovementioned Article 18 or that the obstacle thus created is proportionate. It mentions only the aim of informing consumers on post-harvesting treatments.
Pristojni nemški organi ne podajajo utemeljitve, ki bi omogočala ugotovitev, da je posredovani osnutek nujen za doseganje enega od ciljev iz prej navedenega člena 18 in da so s tem ustvarjene ovire sorazmerne, omenja le cilj obveščanja porabnikov o obdelavi po spravilu.
Consequently, a Community labelling measure should be created for cases where it would be desirable to inform consumers of post-harvesting treatments, as envisaged by Germany.
Zato bi bilo v primerih, ko bi bilo zaželeno takšno obveščanje porabnikov o obdelavi po spravilu, kot ga predvideva Nemčija, potrebno pripraviti določbo Skupnosti o označevanju.
This is the case for sodium orthophenylphenol and orthophenylphenate, as Directive 2003/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [5] provides that they are to be removed from the scope of the legislation on additives as soon as provisions on the labelling of foods treated with these substances come into force pursuant to Community legislation laying down maximum levels of pesticide residues.
Tako je bilo v primeru ortofenilfenola in natrijevega ortofenilfenata, saj že Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2003/114/ES [5] predvideva njuno odstranitev iz zakonodaje o aditivih takoj, ko se bodo določbe o označevanju živil, obdelanih s pomočjo teh snovi, začele uporabljati na podlagi zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki določa mejne vrednosti ostankov pesticidov.
The Commission will be continuing discussions with the Member States with regard to other extensions of labelling to indicate treatment after harvesting.
Komisija bo nadaljevala razprave z državami članicami, ki zadevajo druge razširitve označevanja obdelave po spravilu.
Member States should therefore suspend any national initiatives in this area.
Zato je potrebno opustiti vse nacionalne pobude na tem področju.
In light of these observations, the Commission has delivered a negative opinion pursuant to Article 19(3) of Directive 2000/13/EC.
Zaradi teh ugotovitev Komisija v skladu s členom 19(3) Direktive 2000/13/ES izdaja odklonilno mnenje.
The Federal Republic of Germany is required to refrain from adopting its draft Regulation amending the Regulation on maximum residue limits with a view to adding to it specific provisions on the compulsory labelling of fruit, vegetables and potatoes treated with plant protection substances after harvesting for the purpose of preservation.
Zvezna republika Nemčija je zavezana, da ne sprejme svojega osnutka uredbe, ki spreminja uredbo o mejnih vrednostih ostankov z namenom dodajanja posebnih določb o obveznem označevanju sadja, zelenjave in krompirja, ki so bili zaradi ohranitve izpostavljeni obdelavi s fitofarmacevtskimi sredstvi.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Zvezno republiko Nemčijo.
OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p. 29.
UL L 109, 6.5.2000, str. 29.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2003/89/EC (OJ L 308, 25.11.2003, p. 15).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2003/89/ES (UL L 308, 25.11.2003, str. 15).
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/99/EC (OJ L 309, 6.10.2004, p. 6).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/99/ESA (UL L 309, 6.10.2004, str. 6).
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2004/95/EC (OJ L 301, 28.9.2004, p. 42).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Komisije 2004/95/ES (UL L 301, 28.9.2004, str. 42).
OJ L 244, 14.9.2001, p. 12.
UL L 244, 14.9.2001., str. 12.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 907/2004 (OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 50).
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 907/2004 (UL L 163, 30.4.2004, str. 50).
adopting the plan allocating to the Member States resources to be charged to the 2005 budget year for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community
o sprejetju načrta o dodeljevanju sredstev državam članicam za dobavo hrane iz intervencijskih zalog najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti, za proračunsko leto 2005
(notified under document number C(2004) 4356)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 4356)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 3730/87 of 10 December 1987 laying down the general rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks to designated organisations for distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community [1], and in particular Article 6 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3730/87 z dne 10. decembra 1987 o splošnih pravilih za dobavo hrane iz intervencijskih zalog imenovanim organizacijam za razdeljevanje najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti [1] zlasti člena 6 Uredbe,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 of 15 December 1998 establishing agrimonetary arrangements for the euro [2], and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2799/98 z dne 15. decembra 1998 o vzpostavitvi kmetijsko-monetarne ureditve za euro [2] in zlasti člena 3(2) Uredbe,
In accordance with Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92 of 29 October 1992 laying down detailed rules for the supply of food from intervention stocks for the benefit of the most deprived persons in the Community [3], the Commission must adopt a distribution plan to be financed from resources available in the 2005 budget year.
Skladno s členom 2 Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 3149/92 z dne 29. oktobra 1992 o podrobnih pravilih za dobavo hrane iz intervencijskih zalog v korist najbolj ogroženih oseb v Skupnosti [3], mora Komisija sprejeti načrt razdeljevanja, ki bi se financiral iz neizkoriščenih kreditov iz proračunskega leta 2005.
The plan should lay down in particular, for each of the Member States applying the measure, the maximum financial resources available to carry out its part of the plan, and the quantity of each type of product to be withdrawn from the stocks held by the intervention agencies.
Načrt mora za vsako posamezno državo članico, ki je vključena v te ukrepe, podrobno opredeliti najvišja finančna sredstva, ki so na razpolago za izpeljavo njihovega dela načrta, kot tudi količino posamezne vrste proizvoda, vzetega iz skladišča, ki ga hrani intervencijski odbor.
The Member States involved in the plan have supplied the information required in accordance with Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92.
Države članice, ki se za ukrep zanimajo, so posredovale zahtevane podatke, skladno z določbami člena 1 Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92.
For the purposes of resource allocation, account must be taken of experience and of the degree to which the Member States used the resources allocated to them in previous years.
Da bi sredstva razdelili, je potrebno upoštevati izkušnje in merila, po katerih so države članice uporabile sredstva, ki so jim bila dodeljena v preteklih proračunskih letih.
The intra-Community transfers necessary to bring the plan to fruition should also be authorised under the conditions provided for in Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 3149/92.
Ob upoštevanju pogojev iz člena 7 Uredbe (EGS) št. 3149/92, je treba za uresničitev načrta dovoliti prenos znotraj Skupnosti.
To implement the plan, the operative event within the meaning of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2799/98 should be the date on which the financial year for administration of stocks in public storage starts.
Za izvajanje načrta velja ohraniti kot datum uveljavitve v smislu člena 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 2799/98, datum začetka upravljanja z javnimi zalogami.