natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kolon Industries Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Kolon Industries Inc., Seul, Koreja;
Exporting producers in Taiwan:
Proizvajalci izvozniki na Tajvanu:
Far Eastern Textiles Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan,
Far Eastern Textiles Co. Ltd., Taipei, Tajvan,
Shinkong Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shinkong Corporation, Taipei, Tajvan;
Related importers in the Community:
Povezani uvozniki v Skupnosti:
Honeywell Performance Fibers, Longwy, France,
Honeywell Performance Fibers, Longwy, Francija,
Hyosung Deutschland GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Hyosung Deutschland GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Nemčija.
The investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2003 (the IP).
Preiskava dampinga in škode je pokrila obdobje med 1. januarjem 2003 in 31. decembrom 2003 („OP“).
The examination of trends relevant for the assessment of injury covered the period from January 2000 to the end of the IP (the period considered).
Pregled trendov, pomembnih za oceno nastale škode, je pokril obdobje med januarjem 2000 do konca IP („obravnavano obdobje“).
The product is high-tenacity yarn of polyesters (other than sewing thread), not put up for retail sale, including monofilament of polyesters of less than 67 decitex (the product concerned) originating in Belarus, Korea and Taiwan, normally declared within CN code 54022000.
Izdelek je filamentna preja visoke trdnosti iz poliestra (razen sukanca za šivanje), nepripravljena za prodajo na drobno, vključno z monofilamentom iz poliestrov manj kot 67 deciteksov („zadevni izdelek“) s poreklom iz Belorusije, Republike Koreje in Tajvana, navadno prijavljena pod oznako KN 54022000.
The product concerned features outstanding properties and is used for a number of diverse end-use applications.
Zadevni izdelek ima odlične lastnosti in se uporablja za več različnih končnih namenov.
These include reinforcement applications for mechanical rubber goods, for example conveyor belts, transmission belts and hoses, radial tyres; coated and uncoated fabrics, for example tarpaulins, billboards, geotextiles, protective clothing and seat belts; and linear tension applications, for example, ropes, nets and strapping.
Na primer za učvrščevanje mehaničnih gumiranih izdelkov, na primer transportnih trakov, transmisijskih jermenov in cevi, radialnih pnevmatik, prevlečenih in neprevlečenih tkanin, na primer ponjav, oglasnih desk, geo-tekstila, zaščitnih oblek in avtomobilskih varnostnih pasov ter aplikacij za vodoravno napetost, na primer vrvi, mrež in jermenov.
No differences were found between the product concerned exported from Belarus, Korea and Taiwan to the Community and the product produced and sold on the domestic market in Korea and Taiwan.
Med zadevnim izdelkom, ki se ga v Skupnost izvaža iz Belorusije, Koreje in Tajvana izvaža, in izdelkom, ki se izdeluje in prodaja na notranjih trgih Koreje in Tajvana, ni bilo najdenih razlik.
Indeed, these products have the same basic physical and chemical characteristics and uses.
Izdelka imata iste osnovne fizične in kemične lastnosti in se uporabljata na enak način.
The exporting producer from Belarus claimed that the products it exports to the Community do not resemble those produced and sold in the Community and, therefore, cannot be considered to be like products.
Proizvajalec izvoznik iz Belorusije je trdil, da izdelki, ki jih izvaža v Skupnost, niso podobni izdelkom, izdelani in prodani v Skupnosti, in se zato ne morejo šteti za izdelke.
This claim was based on alleged quality differences and alleged differences in uses between the products exported to the Community by this exporting producer and comparable models produced by the Community producers.
Ta trditev je temeljila na domnevni razliki v kakovosti in domnevnih razlikah v uporabi med izdelki, ki jih ta proizvajalec izvoznik izvaža v Skupnost, in primerljivimi modeli, ki jih izdelujejo proizvajalci Skupnosti.
However, the investigation showed that the products manufactured by the Community producers and sold on the Community market have the same basic physical characteristics and uses when compared to those exported to the Community from the exporting producer concerned.
Vendar pa je preiskava pokazala, da imajo izdelki, ki jih izdelujejo in na trgu Skupnosti prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, v primerjavi z izdelki, ki jih v Skupnost izvažajo zadevni proizvajalci izvozniki, iste osnovne fizične lastnosti in se uporablja na enak način.
In conclusion, the product exported to the Community from Belarus, Korea and Taiwan, the product produced and sold domestically in Korea and Taiwan as well as the one manufactured and sold in the Community by the Community producers were found to have the same basic physical and technical characteristics as well as the same uses and are therefore considered as like products within the meaning of Article 1(4) of the basic Regulation.
Na koncu je bilo ugotovljeno, da imajo izdelek, ki se izvaža v Skupnost iz Belorusije, Koreje in Tajvana, izdelek, ki se izdeluje in prodaja na notranjih trgih Koreje in Tajvana, kot tudi izdelek, ki ga v Skupnosti izdelujejo in prodajajo proizvajalci Skupnosti, iste osnovne fizične in tehnične lastnosti in se uporabljajo na enak način ter se zato v smislu člena 1(4) osnovne uredbe štejejo za podobne izdelke.
General methodology
Splošna metodologija
The general methodology set out hereinafter has been applied to all exporting producers in Korea, Taiwan and, taking into account the notion of an analogue country, also for the exporting producer in Belarus.
V nadaljevanju določena splošna metodologija je bila uporabljena za vse proizvajalce izvoznike v Koreji, na Tajvanu in, upoštevajoč pojem analogne države, tudi za proizvajalca izvoznika iz Belorusije.
The presentation of the findings on dumping for each of the countries concerned therefore only describes what is specific for each exporting country.
Predstavitev ugotovitev o dampingu za vsako izmed zadevnih držav zato opisuje samo, kaj je specifično za vsako posamezno državo izvoznico.
In accordance with Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission first examined whether the domestic sales of the like product to independent customers by each exporting producer were representative, i.e. whether the total volume of such sales was equal to or greater than 5 % of the total volume of the corresponding export sales to the Community.
V skladu s členom 2(2) osnovne uredbe je Komisija najprej preverila, ali je prodaja podobnega izdelka na notranjem trgu vsakega proizvajalca izvoznika neodvisnim kupcem reprezentativna, kar pomeni, ali je celoten obseg take prodaje enak ali večji od 5 % celotnega obsega ustreznega izvoza proizvajalca v Skupnost.
The Commission subsequently identified those types of the like product sold domestically by the companies having overall representative sales which were identical or directly comparable to the types sold for export to the Community.
Komisija je posledično opredelila tiste vrste podobnih izdelkov, ki so jih podjetja, katerih celotna reprezentativna prodaja je enaka ali neposredno primerljiva z vrstami, prodanimi za izvoz v Skupnost, prodajala na notranjem trgu.
Additionally and for each product type sold by the exporting producer on the domestic market, which was found to be directly comparable with the type sold for export to the Community, it was established whether domestic sales were sufficiently representative for the purposes of Article 2(2) of the basic Regulation.
Dodatno in za vsako vrsto izdelka, ki ga proizvajalec izvoznik prodaja na notranjem trgu in je primerljiv z vrsto izdelka, ki se prodaja za izvoz v Skupnost, je bilo ugotovljeno, ali je obseg prodaje na notranjem trgu dovolj reprezentativen za namene člena 2(2) osnovne uredbe.
Domestic sales of a particular product type were considered as sufficiently representative when the total domestic sales volume of that type during the IP represented 5 % or more of the total sales volume of the comparable product type exported to the Community.
Prodaja določene vrste izdelka na notranjem trgu je veljala za dovolj reprezentativno, kadar je celotni obseg prodaje navedene vrste na notranjem trgu v OP znašal 5 % ali več celotnega obsega prodaje primerljive vrste zadevnega izdelka, izvoženega v Skupnost..
The Commission subsequently examined whether the domestic sales of each company could be considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade pursuant to Article 2(4) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je posledično proučila, ali se prodaja na notranjem trgu vsake družbe lahko šteje kot prodaja v običajnem poteku trgovanja v skladu s členom 2(4) osnovne uredbe.
This was done by establishing the proportion of profitable domestic sales to independent customers, of each exported product type: (a) for those product types where more than 80 % by volume of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, and where the weighted average sales price was equal to or higher than the unit cost, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of all domestic sales prices of the type in question; (b) for those product types where at least 10 %, but no more than 80 %, by volume of sales on the domestic market were not below unit costs, normal value, by product type, was calculated as the weighted average of domestic sales prices which were found to be equal to or above unit costs only, of the type in question; (c) for those product types where less than 10 %, by volume of sales, on the domestic market, were not below unit costs, it was considered that the product type concerned was not sold in the ordinary course of trade.
To je bilo izvedeno z določitvijo deleža donosne prodaje na notranjem trgu neodvisnim kupcem vsake vrste izvoženega izdelka: (a) za tiste vrste izdelkov, kjer več kot 80 % obsega prodaje na notranjem trgu ni bilo opravljene pod stroški enote in kjer je bila tehtana povprečna prodajna cena enaka ali višja od cene enote, je bila normalna vrednost na vrsto izdelka izračunana kakor tehtano povprečje vseh cen prodaje na notranjem trgu navedene vrste; (b) za tiste vrste izdelkov, kjer vsaj 10 %, vendar ne več kot 80 %, obsega prodaje na notranjem trgu ni bilo opravljenega pod stroški enote, je bila normalna vrednost izračunana na vrsto izdelka kakor tehtano povprečje cen prodaje na notranjem trgu, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so enake ali višje od stroškov enote navedene vrste; (c) za tiste vrste izdelkov, kjer manj kot 10 % obsega prodaje na notranjem trgu ni bilo opravljenega pod stroški enote, velja, da navedena vrsta izdelka ni bila prodana v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
For sales of product types not made in the ordinary course of trade, as well as for product types which were not sold in representative quantities on the domestic market, normal value had to be constructed.
Za prodajo vrste izdelkov, ki niso bili prodani v običajnem poteku trgovanja, pa tudi za vrste izdelkov, ki na notranjem trgu niso bili prodani v reprezentativnih količinah, je bilo treba računsko določiti normalno vrednost.
To construct normal value pursuant to Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation, the selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses incurred and the weighted average profit realised by each of the co-operating exporting producers concerned on domestic sales of the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, during the investigation period, was added to their own average cost of production during the investigation period.
Za oblikovanje normalne vrednosti v skladu s členom 2(3) osnovne uredbe, so bili nastali prodajni, splošni in administrativni („PSA“) stroški ter tehtani povprečni dobiček, ki ga je s prodajo na notranjem trgu podobnega izdelka v običajnem poteku trgovanja v obdobju preiskave ustvaril vsak izmed zadevnih sodelujočih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, prišteti k povprečnim stroškom proizvodnje v obdobju preiskave.
Where necessary, the costs of production and SG&A expenses reported were adjusted, before being used in the ordinary course of trade test and in constructing normal values.
Kjer je bilo to potrebno, so bili stroški proizvodnje in stroški PSA prilagojeni pred uporabo v preskusu običajnega poteka trgovanja in oblikovanjem normalnih vrednosti.
In all cases where the product concerned was exported to independent customers in the Community, the export price was established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, namely on the basis of export prices actually paid or payable.
V vseh primerih, kjer se je zadevni izdelek izvažal neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti, je bila izvozna cena določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe, namreč na osnovi dejansko plačanih ali plačljivih izvoznih cen.
In the case where sales were made via a related importer, the export price was constructed on the basis of the resale price to independent customers in accordance with Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation.
Če je bila prodaja opravljena prek povezanega uvoznika, je bila izvozna cena računsko določena na osnovi cene pri nadaljnji prodaji neodvisnim kupcem v skladu s členom 2(9) osnovne uredbe.
Adjustments were made in the resale price to the first independent buyer in the Community for all costs including duties and taxes, incurred between importation and resale, in order to establish a reliable export price at ex-works level.
Prilagoditve cene pri nadaljnji prodaji prvemu neodvisnemu kupcu v Skupnosti so bile opravljene za vse stroške, vključno s carinami in davki, nastalimi med uvozom in nadaljnjo prodajo, da bi lahko določili zanesljivo izvozno ceno na osnovi franko tovarna.
These costs were freight, handling, loading, insurance and ancillary expenses, as well as SG&A expenses incurred by the related importer.
To so bili transportni stroški, stroški skladiščenja, nakladanje, zavarovanje in drugi tozadevni stroški, pa tudi stroški PSA, ki jih je imel povezani uvoznik.
The resale price was further adjusted for a reasonable profit margin which was found in the investigation to have been attained by independent importers of the product concerned.
Cena pri nadaljnji prodaji je bila dodatno prilagojena za razumno dobičkovno maržo, za katero je bilo v preiskavi ugotovljeno, da so jo zaračunali neodvisni uvozniki zadevnega izdelka.
The comparison between normal value and export price was made on an ex-works basis.
Primerjava med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno je bila opravljena na osnovi franko tovarna.
For the purpose of ensuring a fair comparison between the normal value and the export price, due allowance in the form of adjustments was made for differences affecting prices and price comparability in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation.
Z namenom zagotoviti pošteno primerjavo med normalno vrednostjo in izvozno ceno, je bila upoštevana prilagoditev za razlike, ki so vplivale na cene in primerljivost cen v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe.
Appropriate adjustments were granted in all cases where they were found to be reasonable, accurate and supported by verified evidence.
Ustrezne prilagoditve so bile odobrene v vseh primerih, kjer se je izkazalo, da so razumne, natančne in podprte s preverjenimi dokazi.
According to Article 2(11) of the basic Regulation, for each co-operating exporting producer, the weighted average normal value was compared with the weighted average export price.
V skladu s členom 2(11) osnovne uredbe je bila za vsakega sodelujočega proizvajalca izvoznika tehtana povprečna normalna vrednost primerjana z tehtano povprečno izvozno ceno.
Since Belarus is a non-market economy within the meaning of Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, normal value had to be based on information obtained in an appropriate market economy third country in which the product was produced and marketed.
Ker Belorusija v smislu člena 2(7) osnovne uredbe ni tržna ekonomija, je morala normalna vrednost temeljiti na podatkih, pridobljenih v ustreznem tržnem gospodarstvu tretje države, v kateri se je izdelek proizvajal in tržil.
In the notice of initiation of the investigation, the United States of America (USA) was envisaged as the appropriate analogue country for the purpose of establishing normal value for Belarus.
V obvestilu o začetku preiskave so bile v namen določitve običajne vrednosti za Belorusijo kot primerna analogna država predvidene Združene države Amerike („ZDA“).
The sole exporting producer in Belarus, JSC ‘Mogilevkhimvolokno’, and the government of Belarus objected to this proposal and suggested the use of Taiwan.
Edini proizvajalec izvoznik v Belorusiji, JSC „Mogilevkhimvolokno“, in beloruska vlada sta temu predlogu nasprotovala ter predlagala uporabo Tajvana.
The relevant arguments put forward were:
Navedeni argumenti so bili naslednji:
the fact that Taiwanese exporters were alleged to be dumping is irrelevant for the purpose of choosing a suitable analogue country;
Domneva, da naj bi tajvanski izvozniki blago prodajali po dampinških cenah, je za namen izbire primerne analogne države nepomembna;
the complainants have related companies with extensive production facilities in the USA and it would not be appropriate to base the normal value on the information provided by these related companies;
pritožniki so podjetja povezovali z velikimi proizvodnimi zmogljivostmi v ZDA, zato normalne vrednosti ne bi bilo primerno osnovati na podatkih, ki bi jih posredovala povezana podjetja;
the similarity of economic development level of the countries, production volumes and end products between Taiwan, on the one hand, and Belarus, unlike the situation in the USA; and
podobnost stopnje gospodarskega razvoja držav, obsega proizvodnje in končnih izdelkov Tajvana in Belorusije so primerljivi z razmerami v ZDA; in
Taiwan was selected as an analogue country for Belarus in previous investigations concerning textile products and is subject to the same investigation.
Tajvan je bil kot analogna država za Belorusijo izbran že v prejšnjih preiskavah glede tekstilnih izdelkov in je tudi predmet iste preiskave.
The Commission contacted all known producers of polyester high tenacity filament yarn in the USA.
Komisija je stopila v stik z vsemi znanimi proizvajalci filamentne preje visoke trdnosti iz poliestra v ZDA.
However, in spite of considerable efforts made by the Commission, co-operation was not obtained from any of these companies within the extended time limits set for this purpose.
Vendar se kljub velikim naporom Komisije nobeno od podjetij v podaljšanem časovnem roku, določenem v ta namen, ni odločilo za sodelovanje.
Consequently, the Commission did not consider it appropriate anymore to consider the USA as an analogue country for this investigation.
Posledično se Komisiji ni več zdelo primerno, da v preiskavi ZDA upošteva kot analogno državo.
The Commission, taking into account the time limits of the investigation and the lack of co-operation from the USA, then investigated whether one of the exporting countries subject to the investigation (Korea or Taiwan) would qualify as a possible market economy third country for the purpose of establishing normal value for Belarus.
Komisija je nato ob upoštevanju časovnega roka preiskave in nesodelovanja ZDA proučila, ali bi lahko bila ena izmed držav izvoznic, vključenih v preiskavo (Koreja in Tajvan), primerna kot možno tržno gospodarstvo tretje države za namen določitve normalno vrednost za Belorusijo.
Both countries would qualify because of similarity of development level and production volumes.
Obe državi bi bili glede na podobnost stopnje razvoja in obsega proizvodnje primerni.
However, between Korea and Taiwan, Korea was found to qualify most, as there was a higher degree of comparability of end products between Belarus and Korea than between Belarus and Taiwan.
V primerjavi med Korejo in Tajvanom, je bila Koreja določena kot primernejša, saj je bila stopnja primerljivosti končnih izdelkov med Belorusijo in Korejo večja kot med Belorusijo in Tajvanom.
It is also to be noted that there are more operators involved in the production and sales of the product concerned in Korea than in Taiwan and that the Korean market of the product concerned is more representative than the Taiwanese one both in total value and total quantities.
Prav tako je treba omeniti, da je v proizvodnjo in prodajo zadevnega izdelka v Koreji vključenih več podjetij kot na Tajvanu in da je korejski trg zadevnega izdelka reprezentativnejši od tajvanskega, tako v celotni vrednosti, kot tudi v celotnem obsegu.
On this basis, in accordance with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, the Commission decided to use Korea as an analogue country.
Na tej podlagi je Komisija v skladu s členom 2(7) osnovne uredbe odločila, da kot analogno državo uporabi Korejo.
Following the choice of Korea as an analogue country, normal value was calculated on the basis of the data verified at the premises of the Korean exporting producers which co-operated fully with the investigation.
V skladu z izbiro Koreje kot analogne države je bila normalna vrednost izračunana na osnovi podatkov, preverjenih v prostorih korejskih proizvajalcev izvoznikov, ki so v preiskavi v celoti sodelovali.
Normal value was based on prices paid or payable on the domestic market of Korea for comparable product types, if these were found to be made in representative quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.
Normalna vrednost je bila osnovana na cenah, plačanih ali plačljivih na notranjem korejskem trgu za primerljive vrste izdelkov, če je bilo zanje ugotovljeno, da so izdelani v reprezentativnih količinah in v običajnem poteku trgovanja.
This was the case for a number of exported product types.
Tako je bilo v primeru več vrst izvoženih izdelkov.
For the other exported product types, which were either not made in the ordinary course of trade in Korea or not sold in representative quantities by the Korean producers on their domestic market, constructed normal values were used.
Za druge vrste izvoženih izdelkov, ki v Koreji bodisi niso bili izdelani v običajnem poteku trgovanja bodisi jih korejski proizvajalci na notranjem trgu niso prodajali v reprezentativnih količinah, so bile uporabljene računsko določene normalne vrednosti.
Normal value was constructed on the basis set out in recital 22 above.
Normalna vrednost je bila računsko določena na osnovi, določeni v uvodni izjavi 22 zgoraj.
As the quantity and value of the export sales reported by the sole exporting producer in Belarus, JSC ‘Mogilevkhimvolokno’, could be reconciled with Eurostat data regarding the overall imports of the product concerned from Belarus, it was considered appropriate to use the reported export sales of this sole exporting producer even though this information was not verified on-spot.
Ker je bilo mogoče količino in vrednost izvoza, ki ju je sporočil edini proizvajalec izvoznik v Belorusiji, JSC „Mogilevkhimvolokno“, uskladiti s podatki Statističnega urada Evropskih skupnosti o celotnem uvozu zadevnega izdelka iz Belorusije, se je zdelo primerno uporabiti sporočeno vrednost izvoza tega edinega proizvajalca izvoznika, kljub temu, da ti podatki niso bili preverjeni na kraju samem.
All export sales of JSC ‘Mogilevkhimvolokno’ were made directly to independent customers in the Community.
Vsa izvozna prodaja podjetja JSC „Mogilevkhimvolokno“ je bila opravljena neposredno neodvisnim kupcem v Skupnosti.
The export price was therefore established in accordance with Article 2(8) of the basic Regulation, on the basis of the prices actually paid or payable.
Izvozna cena je bila tako določena v skladu s členom 2(8) osnovne uredbe na osnovi cen, ki so bile dejansko plačane ali plačljive.
In order to ensure a fair comparison, account was taken, in accordance with Article 2(10) of the basic Regulation, of differences in factors which affect price comparability.
Da bi zagotovili pošteno primerjavo, so bile v skladu s členom 2(10) osnovne uredbe upoštevane razlike v dejavnikih, ki vplivajo na primerljivost cen.