natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Of these 10 parallel tests, 80 % must be positive.
Od teh desetih primerjalnih preskusov jih mora biti 80 % pozitivnih.
As an alternative the applicant may use statistical methods and demonstrate with a one-sided 95 % confidence range that the test product is as good as or better than the reference product in at least 80 % of the test rounds, if more than 10 parallel tests are made.
Vlagatelj lahko kot alternativo uporabi statistične metode in z enostranskim 95 % zaupanjem dokaže, da je preskusni proizvod enako dober ali boljši od referenčnega proizvoda v najmanj 80 % preskusnih krogov, če je bilo izvedenih več kot deset primerjalnih preskusov.
How it is shown that the product tested has a better performance than that of pure water.
Podatke o tem, kako je dokazano, da je preskušani proizvod bolj učinkovit od čiste vode.
Note on tests
Opombe pri preskušanju
The CTTN-IREN test ‘Washing of tiled floor and grease removal on kitchen surface’ fulfils the requirements for all-purpose cleaners provided that the number of tests is increased, the same amount of soil is applied in all subtests, and an assessment of the gentleness of the products on surfaces is included.
Preskus CTTN-IREN „Čiščenje tal, obloženih s ploščicami, in odstranjevanje maščobe na kuhinjskih površinah“ izpolnjuje zahteve univerzalnih čistil pod pogojem, da se število preskusov poveča, da se nanese enaka količina umazanije na vseh pod-preskusih in da je vključena tudi ocena blagosti proizvodov za površine.
The method described by the Danish Consumer Information fulfils the requirements for all-purpose cleaners provided that the number of tests with each product is increased (Testing of all-purpose cleaners, 2004; Danish title: ‘Sådan er universalrengøringsmidlerne testet’;
Metoda, ki jo opisuje danski center za obveščanje potrošnikov, izpolnjuje zahteve za univerzalna čistila pod pogojem, da se število preskusov za vse proizvode poveča (Preskušanje univerzalnih čistil, 2004; danski naslov: „Sĺdan er universalrengřringsmidlerne testet“;
The IKW-test ‘Empfehlung zur Qualitätsbewertung für Badezimmerreiniger’ (SÖFW-Journal, 129, Jahrgang 3, 2003) fulfils the requirements for bathroom cleaners.
Preskus IKW „Empfehlung zur Qualitätsbewertung für Badezimmerreiniger“ (SÖFW-Journal, 129, Jahrgang 3, 2003) izpolnjuje zahteve za čistila za kopalnice.
The IKW-test ‘Recommendations for the quality assessment of acidic toilet cleaners’ (SÖFW-Journal, 126, 11-2000) fulfils the requirements for sanitary cleaners.
Preskus IKW „Priporočila za kakovostno oceno kislih čistil za stranišče“ (SÖFW-Journal, 126, 11-2000) izpolnjuje zahteve za čistila za sanitarne prostore.
The method described by the Danish Consumer Information fulfils the requirements for sanitary cleaners (Testing of sanitary cleaners, 2004; Danish title: ‘Sådan er toiletrensemidlerne testet’;
Metoda, ki jo opisuje danski center za obveščanje potrošnikov, izpolnjuje zahteve za čistila za sanitarne prostore (Preskušanje čistil za sanitarne prostore, 2004; danski naslov: „Sĺdan er toiletrensemidlerne testet“;
The CHELAB test ‘Detergents for hard surfaces: washing efficiency’ (CHELAB internal test method n. 0578) fulfils the requirements for all-purpose cleaners provided that a test with pure water (without addition of detergent) is included in the procedure (www.chelab.it/).
Preskus CHELAB „Detergenti za trde površine: učinkovitost čiščenja“ (notranja metoda preskušanja CHELAB št. 0578) izpolnjuje zahteve za univerzalna čistila pod pogojem, da je v postopek vključen tudi preskus s čisto vodo (brez dodanega detergenta) (www.chelab.it/).
Consumer tests
Preskusi, ki jih opravijo potrošniki
The aim of the consumer test is to show whether the test product cleans as good as or better than a comparative reference product, and that the test product does not hurt the surfaces it is intended for.
Cilj potrošniških preskusov je pokazati, ali preskušani proizvod očisti enako dobro ali bolje kot primerljivi referenčni proizvod, in da preskušani proizvod ne poškoduje površine, za katero je namenjen.
For testing of consumer products, responses must be received from a minimum of 20 persons, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
Za preskušanje potrošniških proizvodov se mora odzvati najmanj 20 oseb, ki so bile naključno izbrane v prodajni regiji in običajno uporabljajo referenčni proizvod.
For testing of professional products, responses must be received from at least five professional users, randomly selected in the sales region and normally using the reference product
Za preskušanje proizvodov za profesionalno rabo se mora odzvati najmanj petih poklicnih uporabnikov, ki so bili naključno izbrani v prodajni regiji in običajno uporabljajo referenčni proizvod.
The test product and the reference product should be of the same product category.
Preskušani in referenčni proizvod morata biti iz iste kategorije proizvodov.
The reference products shall be the products normally used by the test persons.
Referenčni proizvodi so proizvodi, ki jih preskuševalci običajno uporabljajo.
The dosages used must be the dose recommended by the manufacturer
Uporabljeni odmerki morajo biti odmerki, ki jih priporoča proizvajalec.
The test must be performed on the type(s) of surface relevant in relation to the recommendations on the label
Preskus mora biti opravljen na takšni površini, ki ustreza priporočilom na etiketi.
The test period must allow for at least five uses of the test product
Čas preskusa mora omogočiti najmanj pet uporab preskušanega proizvoda.
Effectiveness of all-purpose cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:The ability of the products to remove soil
Učinkovitost univerzalnih čistil je treba ugotavljati glede na naslednje lastnosti:zmogljivost odstranjevanja umazanije
The gentleness of the products on the surface(s) on which it is used
blagost proizvoda za površino(-e), na kateri(-h) se uporablja
Effectiveness of sanitary cleaners must be assessed by the following properties:The ability to remove fat-based soil
Učinkovitost čistil za sanitarne prostore je treba ugotavljati glede na naslednje lastnosti:zmogljivost odstranjevanja umazanije, ki temelji na maščobi
The ability to remove calcium deposits (not relevant for cleaning products for kitchens)
zmogljivost odstranjevanja vodnega kamna (ni bistvena za čistila za kuhinje)
The gentleness of the product on the surface(s) on which it is used
blagost proizvoda za površino(-e), na kateri(-h) se uporablja
The test persons must reply to the question ‘How effective do you consider the test product to be compared to the product you normally use?’ — or equivalent.
Preskuševalci morajo odgovoriti na vprašanje: „Kako učinkovit se vam zdi preskusni proizvod v primerjavi s proizvodom, ki ga običajno uporabljate?“ — ali na enakovredno vprašanje.
At least three possibilities for a response must be available, e.g. ‘poorer’, ‘as good as’ and ‘better’
Na voljo morajo biti najmanj tri možnosti za odgovor, npr. „slabši“, „enako dober“ in „boljši“.
At least 80 % of the test persons must assess the product to be ‘as good as’ or ‘better’ than the reference product
Najmanj 80 % preskuševalcev mora oceniti proizvod kot „enako dober“ ali „boljši“ kot referenčni proizvod.
A detailed test report must be submitted to the competent body, including information/documentation on:
Pristojnemu organu mora biti predloženo podrobno poročilo o preskusu, ki vključuje informacije/dokumentacijo o:
The selection of the test persons
izbiri preskuševalcih
The information provided by the test persons and a summary describing how the testing was performed
informacijah, ki so jih dali preskuševalci, in povzetek, ki opisuje, kako se je preskušanje potekalo
The type of surface(s) the product was tested on.
vrsti površine(-), na kateri(-ih) je bil proizvod preskušen
For each test person, the following information must be available, e.g. in the form of answers to a questionnaire:The dosage used by the test person
O vsakem preskuševalcu morajo biti na voljo naslednje informacije, npr. v obliki odgovorov na vprašalnik:odmerek, ki ga je uporabil preskuševalec
The name of the reference product
ime referenčnega proizvoda
A statement declaring that the product has been tested at least five times
izjava, da je bil proizvod preskušen najmanj petkrat
The result of the comparison of the test product and the reference product
rezultat primerjave preskušanega in referenčnega proizvoda
Calculation and documentation showing that at least 80 % of the test persons assess the product to be as good as or better than the reference product.
Izračun in dokumentacija, ki kaže, da najmanj 80 % preskuševalcev ocenjuje, da je proizvod enako dober ali boljši od referenčnega proizvoda.
AHTN (6-Acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7-hexamethyltetralin).
AHTN (6-acetil-1,1,2,4,4,7-heksametiltetralin)
Assessment and verification: the applicant shall provide a declaration supported by declarations from manufacturers of ingredients, as appropriate, confirming that the listed substances have not been included in the product.
Ocenjevanje in preverjanje: vlagatelj zagotovi deklaracijo, po potrebi podprto z deklaracijami proizvajalcev sestavin, da navedene snovi niso vključene v proizvod.
The above requirements shall apply to each ingredient (substance or preparation) that exceeds 0,01 % by weight of the final product.
Zgornje zahteve veljajo za vsako sestavino (snov ali pripravek), ki presegajo 0,01 % mase končnega proizvoda.
SF(chronic) [1]
VF (kronični) [1]
TF(chronic)
LTE (kronični)
Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 shall be applied. (d) Information about the eco-label
Uporablja se Uredba (ES) št. 648/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o detergentih.(d) Informacije o znaku za okolje
of 18 February 2004
z dne 18. februarja 2004
on restructuring aid implemented by Germany for Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG
o pomoči Nemčije pri prestrukturiranju v korist Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG
(notified under document number C(2004) 327)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 327)
(Only the German text is authentic)
(Besedilo v nemškem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 7(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES in zlasti člena 7(3) Uredbe,
Having called on Member States and other interested parties to submit their comments and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu držav članic in drugih udeleženk na osnovi prej omenjenih določb, da podajo svoje mnenje in ob upoštevanju njihovih pripomb,
After approval of the rescue aid for Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG (BGB or ‘the bank’) by Commission decision of 25 July 2001 and after notification by Germany of the restructuring plan on 28 January 2002, the Commission informed Germany by letter of 9 April 2002 of its decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty in respect of the restructuring aid.
Po tem ko je Komisija dne 25. julija 2001 odobrila pomoč za reševanje v korist Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG („BGB“ ali „banka“) in je Nemčija dne 28. januarja 2002 Komisiji predložila Načrt prestrukturiranja, je Komisija Nemčiji z dopisom dne 9. aprila 2002 sporočila svojo odločitev, da bo zaradi pomoči pri prestrukturiranju začela postopek v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 88 Pogodbe ES.
On 17 June 2002, after Germany had requested an extension of the deadline for a reply, which was granted, and after German representatives had twice met representatives of the Commission, Germany submitted its observations, with additional documents and information.
Po zaprošenem in odobrenem podaljšanju roka in po dveh pogovorih s predstavniki Komisije je Nemčija dne 17. junija 2002 predložila svoje mnenje, kot tudi dodatne dokumente in informacije.
On 31 July the Commission sent Germany a further request for information.
Dodatna prošnja za predložitev informacij je bila Nemčiji pisno predložena dne 31. julija 2002.
When it published its decision to initiate the procedure in the Official Journal of the European Communities, the Commission also called on other interested parties to submit their comments.
Z objavo Sklepa Komisije o odprtju postopka obdelave v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti je Komisija tudi ostale udeleženke pozvala, da podajo svoje mnenje.
On 9 July and, after it had extended the deadline, on 22 July 2002, it received observations from a competitor and from another interested party who requested that his identity remain confidential.
Nato je 9. julija in po podaljšanju roka 22. julija 2002 prejela pripombe enega tekmeca in udeleženca, ki je prosil, da njegova identiteta ostane neodkrita.
On 1 August these observations were forwarded to Germany for comment.
Te pripombe so bile 1. avgusta 2002 predložene Nemčiji, da poda svoje mnenje.
Germany’s comments were received, after extension of the deadline, on 23 September.
Pisni odgovor Nemčije je bil prejet 23. septembra 2002, po podaljšanju roka.
In response to Commission requests, Germany supplied further information on the notified aid measure by letters dated 16 and 20 September, 14 and 18 November and 18 December 2002 and 14 February and 14 March 2003.
Na zahtevo je Nemčija za prijavljeno pomoč predložila dodatne podatke z dne 16. in 20. septembra, 14. in 18. novembra in 18. decembra 2002, ter 14. februarja in 14. marca 2003.
The Commission was also informed of the stage reached in the restructuring process at a number of meetings with representatives of Germany, the Land of Berlin and BGB.
Poleg tega je bila Komisija na različnih srečanjih s predstavniki Nemčije, dežele Berlin in BGB obveščena o stanju postopka prestrukturiranja.
At a meeting held on 26 March 2003, Germany informed the Commission of the reasons of the previous day’s failure of the call for bids with a view to the privatisation of Bankgesellschaft Berlin AG, for which an international public tender had been launched back in 2002.
Na razgovoru dne 26. marca 2003 je Nemčija Komisijo obvestila o razlogih za neuspeh postopka oddaje naročila o privatizaciji BGB z dne 25. marca 2003, ki se je začel na osnovi javnega mednarodnega razpisa leta 2002.
On 31 March further information on this point was supplied, as were the balance sheet and profit‐and‐loss account for 2002.
Dodatne upoštevne informacije in bilanca stanja ter bilanca uspeha iz leta 2002 so bile predložene 31. marca 2003
The Commission made further requests for information on 15 April, 6 May and 16 May 2003, which were answered on 15 May, 28 May and 24 June respectively.
Na naslednje prošnje za predložitev informacij, ki jih je Komisija poslala 15. aprila, 6. in 16. maja 2003, so bili 15. maja, 28. maja in 24. junija 2003 podani pisni odgovori.
Further information was discussed in a letter of 1 July and at meetings with representatives of Germany, the Land of Berlin and BGB which took place on 4 April, 11 April, 14 May and 9 July.
Dodatne informacije so bile obravnavane pisno dne 1. julija 2003 in na srečanjih s predstavniki Nemčije, dežele Berlin in BGB dne 4. in 11. aprila, 14. maja in 9. julija 2003.
On 14 July 2003 the Commission asked the auditing firm Mazars Revision & Treuhandgesellschaft mbH, Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Düsseldorf, as a consultant, to analyse certain aspects of the restructuring plan.
julija 2003 je Komisija kot izvedenko pooblastila revizijsko družbo Mazars Revision & Treuhandelgesellschaft mbH iz Düsseldorfa, da analizira določene vidike načrta prestrukturiranja.
The conclusions were discussed with Germany on 3 October, and the final report was presented to Germany on 20 November 2003.
Rezultati so bili obravnavani 3. oktobra 2003 skupaj z Nemčijo. Končno poročilo je bilo 20. novembra 2003 predloženo Nemčiji.
In October 2003 the need for further compensatory measures was discussed, partly in the presence of representatives of the bank.
Oktobra 2003 je bila, delno ob navzočnosti predstavnikov banke, obravnavana potreba po dodatnih izravnavah.
In November the Commission informed Germany of the measures it was contemplating and gave it and the bank the opportunity to comment on the financial implications for the bank, which were discussed in December.
Novembra 2003 je bila Nemčija obveščena o predvidenih ukrepih Komisije. Kot banka je dobila priložnost izraziti svoje mnenje o gospodarskih učinkih na banko, ki so bili obravnavani decembra 2003.
On 18 December 2003 it was agreed that Germany would give the Commission an undertaking to divest Berliner Bank separately by 1 October 2006, the sale being effective no later than 1 February 2007, and to privatise the group by 31 December 2007, together with other divestment measures.
decembra 2003 je bilo dogovorjeno, da bo Nemčija do Komisije sprejela dolžnost ločeno odsvojiti banko Berliner Bank do 1. oktobra 2006, ki bo začela veljati najkasneje do 1. februarja 2007, in privatizirati koncern do 31. decembra 2007, ter sprejeti dodatne odsvojitvene ukrepe.
Germany submitted to the Commission on 29 January 2004 the revised restructuring plan, which took account in particular of the recommendations of the Commission’s consultants, and on 6 February the commitments relating to the revised restructuring plan.
Nemčija je 29. januarja 2004 Komisiji predložila preoblikovan Načrt prestrukturiranja, ki je še zlasti upošteval priporočila izvedencev Komisije in 6. februarja 2004 še zagotovitve Nemčije, ki veljajo za preoblikovan načrt prestrukturiranja.
BGB is the holding company that owns the BGB group, which was formed in 1994 by the amalgamation of several credit institutions formerly controlled by the Land of Berlin; BGB also does business as a credit institution in its own right.
BGB je holding družba koncerna BGB, ustanovljenega leta 1994 z združitvijo več kreditnih ustanov, ki jih je nekoč nadzirala dežela Berlin, vendar je na trgu tudi sama dejavna kot kreditna ustanova.
For the purposes of the Banking Law (Kreditwesengesetz), its core‐capital ratio was 5,7 % at the end of 2001 (total capital ratio of 9,4 %), while at the end of 2002 its core‐capital ratio was 5,6 % (total capital ratio of 9,4 %).
Stopnja temeljnega kapitala je po Zakonu o kreditni dejavnosti („ZKD“) znašala 5,7 % v letu 2001, kot je razvidno iz zaključnega računa (stopnja celotnega kapitala 9,4 %) in 5,6 % v letu 2002, kot je razvidno iz zaključnega računa 2002 (stopnja celotnega kapitala 9,4).
In June 2001, before the rescue aid was approved, the core‐capital ratio had fallen to [...]* % (total capital ratio of [...]** %).
Junija 2001, pred odobritvijo pomoči za reševanje, je stopnja temeljnega kapitala padla na [...] % (stopnja celotnega kapitala [...]** %).
Before the capital injection of August 2001, the Land of Berlin held 56,6 % of the shares in BGB; it now has about 81 %.
Dežela Berlin je imela pred prejemom kapitala avgusta 2001 56,6 % delež BGB, ki znaša sedaj 81 %.
Other shareholders are Norddeutsche Landesbank (NordLB), with about 11 %, and Gothaer Finanzholding AG, with about 2 %.
Drugi delničarji so Norddeutsche Landesbank (NordLB) z okoli 11 % in Goather Finanzholding AG s približno 2 %.
About 6 % of the equity is in dispersed ownership.
Približno 6 % delež lastništva je razpršen.
The largest subsidiaries or divisions in the BGB group, which likewise engage in banking, are Landesbank Berlin (LBB) and Berlin‐Hannoversche Hypothekenbank AG (BerlinHyp).
H koncernu BGB sodita kot največji hčerinski družbi oz. dela koncerna, ki se prav tako ukvarjata z bančnimi posli, Landesbank Berlin („LBB“) in Berlin-Hannoversche Hypothekenbank AG („BerlinHyp“).
LBB is an institution established under public law in which BGB has an atypical undisclosed holding (atypisch stille Beteiligung) of 75,01 %.
LBB je javnopravna ustanova, z netipično tiho udeležbo BGB-ja 75,01 %.
There is a profit‐and‐loss transfer agreement which means that, in economic terms, BGB can be deemed to be LBB’s sole owner.
Po obstoječi pogodbi o odvajanju poslovnega izida je treba BGB gospodarsko obravnavati kot 100 % delničarko.
BerlinHyp engages in real estate financing; BGB owns 89,9 % of the equity.
BGB ima 89,9 % delnic BerlinHyp, ki se ukvarja s financiranjem nepremičnin.
The group also includes IBAG Immobilien und Beteiligungen Aktiengesellschaft (IBAG), which operates in the real estate services business previously handled by Immobilien und Baumanagement der Bankgesellschaft Berlin GmbH (IBG).
Nadalje sodi h koncernu še delni koncern IBAG Immobilien und Beteiligungen Aktiengesellschaft („IBAG“), ki deluje na področju nepremičninskih storitev, in ki ga je v preteklosti upravljalo poslovodstvo za nepremičnine in gradbene storitve bančne družbe Berlin GmbH („IBG“).
Directly or indirectly, BGB also controls or has controlled various other domestic and foreign firms, such as Weberbank, Allgemeine Privatkundenbank AG (Allbank, now sold), BGB Ireland, BGB UK, BG Polska (the retail and Inteligo internet businesses have now been sold, and liquidation of the remaining shell has begun) and the Czech bank Zivnostenska Banka a.s.
Poleg tega banka neposredno ali posredno nadzira oz. je nadzirala, neposredno ali posredno, tudi različna druga domača ali tuja podjetja kot npr. Weberbank, Allgemeine Privatkundenbank AG („Allbank“, medtem prodana), BGB Ireland, BGB UK, BD Polska (poslovanje s prebivalstvom in internetno področje „Inteligo“, medtem prodana, uvedena je likvidacija preostale „ovojnine“), kot tudi češka Zivnostenská Banka a.s.
(now sold).
(medtem prodana).
BGB’s core business is retail banking for private and corporate customers, where it trades under the two names Berliner Sparkasse and Berliner Bank.
Osnovna dejavnost BGB je poslovanje z občani in s podjetji (poslovanje s prebivalstvom) preko imen „Berliner Sparkasse“ in „Berliner Bank“.
These are not legally independent subsidiaries, but rather brands or branches.
Pri obeh ne gre za pravno samostojni hčerinski podjetji, ampak za imena oz. podružnice.
Since 1 July 2003 Berliner Bank has belonged to LBB, as Berliner Sparkasse already did.
Od 1. julija 2003 sodi „Berliner Bank“, kot pred tem že „Berliner Sparkasse“, k LBB.
The corporate clients are mainly small and medium‐sized enterprises in the region.
Pri podjetjih gre v glavnem za manjša in srednja regijska podjetja.
Apart from retail banking, real estate financing and real estate services, BGB and its subsidiaries also operate on capital markets (money and securities dealings) and in two segments which are to be run down or drastically cut back, the large customer/international segment (e.g. project and export financing) and the public sector segment (lending).
Poleg dejavnosti poslovanja s prebivalstvom, financiranjem nepremičnin in nepremičninskimi storitvami poslujejo BGB oz. njene hčerinske družbe dejavne tudi na trgu kapitala (denarni posli in posli z vrednostnimi papirji) in na segmentih velike stranke/tujina (npr. financiranje projektov in izvoza) ter javnih organov (dajanje kreditov), ki so v postopku likvidacije oz. ki se močno krčijo.
The investment banking business comprised only some relatively limited share and bond issues and will play no further independent role in future.
Dejavnosti na področju investicijskega bančništva so omejene na izdajanje delnic in obveznic v relativno majhnem obsegu, zato v prihodnosti več ne bodo imele samostojne vloge.
Geographically, BGB’s business is concentrated in the Berlin area and the Land of Brandenburg, especially as far as retail banking is concerned.
Zemljepisno teži dejavnost BGB na območje Berlina in dežele Brandenburg, še zlasti glede bančne dejavnosti poslovanja s prebivalstvom.
But it does also operate countrywide, e.g. in real estate financing, and internationally, e.g. on capital markets.
Tako je na primer dejavna na področju financiranja nepremičnin, vendar tudi na nacionalni in, na primer na področju poslovanja na trgu kapitala, tudi na mednarodni ravni.
In the Berlin area BGB is the market leader in retail banking, with shares of individual segments ranging from about 20 % to over 50 %.
Na širšem območju Berlina je BGB na področju bančne dejavnosti poslovanja s prebivalstvom s približno 20 % do preko 50 % deležem na posameznih segmentih vodilna na trgu.