natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In light of the foregoing, the Commission considers that a fine of EUR 45000 for each of Tetra’s two infringements, i.e. of Article 14(1)(b) and of Article 14(1)(c), is appropriate.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega Komisija meni, da je globa v višini 45000 EUR za vsako od dveh kršitev s strani podjetja Tetra, tj. za kršitev člena 14(1)(b) in člena 14(1)(c), primerna.
The Commission imposes two fines each of EUR 45000 (totalling EUR 90000) on Tetra for its infringement of Article 14(1)(b) and of Article 14(1)(c).
Komisija nalaga podjetju Tetra dve globi po 45000 EUR (skupaj 90000 EUR) zaradi kršitve člena 14(1)(b) in člena 14(1)(c).
More than EUR [0-10] million had been spent in developing Tetra Fast by the end of 2000 and a further investment of EUR [0-10] million was foreseen for the year of the Original Notification. Tetra’s had carried out or commissioned studies in respect of the technology in 2000.
Za razvoj Tetra Fast so do konca leta 2000 porabili več kot [0-10] milijonov EUR in v letu prvotne priglasitve so za nadaljnje investicije predvideli [0-10] milijonov EUR. Tetra je izvedla ali naročila študije glede na tehnologijo v letu 2000.
During the Tetra I proceedings, Tetra failed to disclose the existence of the Tetra Fast technology in the Form CO itself as well as in replies to at least one Article 11 letter seeking information on PET packaging markets. The Commission was completely unaware of the technology's existence and hence of its importance.
Med postopki za Tetra I, Tetra ni razkrila obstoja tehnologije Tetra Fast niti v obrazcu CO niti vsaj enkrat v dopisih v odgovor na člen 11 pri iskanju informacij o trgih embalaže PET. Komisija ni vedela za obstoj tehnologije in se zato ni zavedala njene pomembnosti.
Regarding Question 5, Tetra was aware at this time of the potential of Tetra Fast to be used as a means of applying a coating to the inner side of the PET bottle. Tetra’s failure to mention Tetra Fast renders its reply incorrect.
Glede vprašanja 5 se je Tetra zavedala možnosti uporabe tehnologije Tetra Fast kot sredstva za nanos prevleke na notranjo stran plastenk PET. Zaradi nenavedbe tehnologije Tetra Fast je odgovor Tetre netočen.
authorising a method for grading pig carcases in Latvia
o odobritvi metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Latviji
(notified under document number C(2005) 1098)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1098)
(Only the Latvian text is authentic)
(Besedilo v latvijskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
The Government of Latvia has requested the Commission to authorise one method for grading pig carcases and has submitted the results of its dissection trial which was executed before the day of accession, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85.
Vlada Latvije je zaprosila Komisijo za odobritev metode za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov in je predložila rezultate svojega poskusa z razkosavanjem, ki je bil izveden pred dnem pristopa, s predložitvijo dela dve protokola, opredeljenega v členu 3 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2967/85.
No modification of the apparatus or the grading method may be authorised except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained.
Sprememba naprave ali metode razvrščanja se lahko odobri samo z novo odločbo Komisije, sprejeto na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj.
For this reason, the present authorisation may be revoked.
Zato se lahko ta odobritev prekliče.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Pigmeat,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Upravljalnega odbora za svinjsko meso –
The use of the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)’ and assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in the Annex, is hereby authorised for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in Latvia.
Uporaba naprave, imenovane „Intrascope (Optical Probe)“, in z njo povezanih metod ocenjevanja, podrobno opredeljenih v Prilogi, se odobri za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Latviji v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3220/84.
Notwithstanding the standard presentation referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84, pig carcases may be presented in Latvia without the head, the hind feet and the tail before being weighed and graded.
Ne glede na standardno obdelavo iz člena 2 Uredbe (EGS) št. 3220/84, so lahko prašičji trupi v Latviji obdelani z glavo, zadnjimi nogicami in repom pred tehtanjem in razvrščanjem.
In order to establish quotations for pig carcases on a comparable basis, the recorded hot weight shall be increased by:
Zaradi postavitve ponudbe cen za prašičje trupe na primerljivi podlagi se zabeležena masa toplega trupa poveča za:
7,61 % for the missing head
7,61 % za odstranjeno glavo,
1,61 % for the missing hind feet
1,61 % za odstranjene zadnje nogice,
0,11 % for the missing tail.
0,11 % za odstranjeni rep.
Modifications of the apparatus or the assessment method shall not be authorised.
Spremembe naprave ali metode ocenjevanja niso dovoljene.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Latvia.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Latvijo.
Done at Brussels, 12 April 2005.
V Bruslju, 12. aprila 2005
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN LATVIA
METODE ZA RAZVRŠČANJE PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV V LATVIJI
Grading of pig carcases shall be carried out by means of the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)’.
Razvrščanje prašičjih trupov se opravi z napravo, imenovano „Intrascope (Optical Probe)“.
The apparatus shall be equipped with a hexagonal-shaped probe of a maximum width of 12 millimetres (and of 19 millimetres at the blade at the top of the probe) containing a viewing window and a light source, a sliding barrel calibrated in millimetres, and having an operating distance of between 3 and 45 millimetres.
Naprava je opremljena s šesterokotno sondo maksimalne širine 12 milimetrov (19 milimetrov na jezičku na vrhu sonde), ki vsebuje pregledovalno okence in svetlobni vir ter v milimetrih umerjen drsni valj, in ima obratovalno razdaljo med 3 in 45 milimetri.
Where:
pri čemer:
x the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 6 centimetres off the midline of the carcase at the last rib.
x debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 6 centimetrov od vzdolžne osi trupa na zadnjem rebru.
The formula shall be valid for carcases weighing between 55 and 120 kilograms.
Enačba velja za trupe, ki tehtajo med 55 in 120 kilogrami.
In Latvia commercial practice may require that the head, the hind feet and the tail are removed from the pig carcase. This should be taken into account in adjusting the weight for standard presentation.
V Latviji trgovinska praksa lahko zahteva, da se prašičjemu trupu odstranijo glava, zadnje nogice in rep. To je treba upoštevati pri prilagoditvi teže standardni obdelavi.
authorising methods for grading pig carcases in Estonia
o odobritvi metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Estoniji
(notified under document number C(2005) 1099)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1099)
(Only the Estonian text is authentic)
(Besedilo v estonskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
The Government of Estonia has requested the Commission to authorise two methods for grading pig carcases and has submitted the results of its dissection trial which was executed before the day of accession, by presenting part two of the protocol provided for in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2967/85.
Vlada Estonije je zaprosila Komisijo za odobritev dveh metod za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov in je predložila rezultate svojega poskusa z razkosavanjem, ki je bil izveden pred dnem pristopa, s predložitvijo dela dve protokola, opredeljenega v členu 3 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2967/85.
In Estonia commercial practice may require that the head, the fore feet and the tail are removed from the pig carcase; this should be taken into account in adjusting the weight for standard presentation.
V Estoniji trgovinska praksa lahko zahteva, da prašičjemu trupu odstranijo glava, prednje nogice in rep; to je treba upoštevati pri prilagoditvi teže za standardno obdelavo.
No modification of the apparata or the grading methods may be authorised except by means of a new Commission Decision adopted in the light of experience gained; for this reason, the present authorisation may be revoked.
Sprememba naprav ali metod razvrščanja se lahko odobri samo z novo odločbo Komisije, sprejeto na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj; iz tega razloga se lahko sedanja odobritev prekliče.
The use of the following methods is hereby authorised for grading pig carcases pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84 in Estonia:
Za razvrščanje prašičjih trupov v Estoniji se v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3220/84 odobri uporaba naslednjih metod:
the apparatus termed ‘Intrascope (Optical Probe)’ and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 1 of the Annex;
naprava, imenovana „Intrascope (Optical Probe)“, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 1 Priloge;
the apparatus termed ‘Ultra-FOM 300’ and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in Part 2 of the Annex.
naprava, imenovana „Ultra-FOM 300“, in z njo povezane metode ocenjevanja, ki so podrobno opredeljene v delu 2 Priloge.
As regards the apparatus ‘Ultra-FOM 300’, referred to in the first paragraph, point (b), it is laid down that after the end of the measurement procedure it must be possible to verify on the carcase that the apparatus measured the values of measurement X2 and X4 on the site provided for in the Annex, Part 2, point 3.
Glede naprave „Ultra-FOM 300“ iz točke (b) prvega odstavka se določi, da mora biti po opravljenem postopku merjenja na trupu možno preveriti, ali je naprava izmerila vrednosti meritve X2 in X4 na mestu, določenem v točki 3 dela 2 Priloge.
Notwithstanding the standard presentation referred to in Article 2(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 3220/84, pig carcases may be presented in Estonia without the head, the fore feet and the tail before being weighed and graded.
Ne glede na standardno obdelavo iz člena 2(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 3220/84 so lahko prašičji trupi v Estoniji obdelani z glavo, prednjimi nogicami in repom pred tehtanjem in razvrščanjem.
In order to establish quotations for pig carcases on a comparable basis, the recorded hot weight shall be multiplied by 1,07.
Zaradi postavitve ponudbe cen za prašičje trupe na primerljivi podlagi se zabeležena masa toplega trupa množi z 1,07.
This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Estonia.
Ta odločba je naslovljena na Republiko Estonijo.
METHODS FOR GRADING PIG CARCASES IN ESTONIA
METODE ZA RAZVRŠČANJE PRAŠIČJIH TRUPOV V ESTONIJI
Where:
pri čemer je:
X the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 7 centimetres off the midline of the carcase at the last rib.
X debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 7 centimetrov od vzdolžne osi trupa na zadnjem rebru.
The apparatus shall be equipped with an ultrasonic probe at 3,5 MHz (Krautkrämer MB 4 SE).
Naprava je opremljena z ultrazvočno sondo s frekvenco 3,5 MHz (Krautkrämer MB 4 SE).
the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 7 cm off the midline of the carcase, at the last rib,
debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 7 cm od vzdolžne osi trupa na zadnjem rebru,
the thickness of muscle in millimetres, measured at the same time and in the same place as X2,
debelina mišice v milimetrih, merjena istočasno in na istem mestu kot X2,
the thickness of back-fat (including rind) in millimetres, measured at 7 cm off the midline of the carcase, between the third and the fourth last rib.
debelina hrbtne slanine (vključno s kožo) v milimetrih, merjena 7 cm od vzdolžne osi trupa med tretjim in četrtim zadnjim rebrom.
of 15 April 2005
z dne 15. aprila 2005
providing for the temporary marketing of certain seed of the species Glycine max not satisfying the requirements of Council Directive 2002/57/EC
o začasnem trženju določenega semena vrste Glycine max, ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev Direktive Sveta 2002/57/ES
(notified under document number C(2005) 1137)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1137)
Having regard to Council Directive 2002/57/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants [1], and in particular Article 21(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2002/57/ES z dne 13. junija 2002 o trženju semena oljnic in predivnic [1] in zlasti člena 21(1) Direktive,
In Austria the quantity of available seed of soya bean (Glycine max) suitable to the national climatic conditions and which satisfies the germination capacity requirements of Directive 2002/57/EC is insufficient and is therefore not adequate to meet the needs of that Member State.
V Avstriji je količina razpoložljivega semena soje (Glycine max), prilagojene nacionalnim podnebnim razmeram in ki izpolnjuje zahteve o kalivosti Direktive 2002/57/ES, nezadostna in zato ne more zadovoljiti potreb te države članice.
It is not possible to meet the demand for seed of these species satisfactorily with seed from other Member States or from third countries which satisfies all the requirements laid down in Directive 2002/57/EC.
Povpraševanju po semenu navedenih vrst ni mogoče zadovoljivo zadostiti s semenom iz drugih držav članic ali tretjih držav, ki bi izpolnjevalo vse zahteve iz Direktive 2002/57/ES.
Accordingly, Austria should be authorised to permit the marketing of seed of that species subject to less stringent requirements for a period expiring on 15 June 2005.
V skladu s tem bi morala biti Avstrija pooblaščena, da dovoli trženje semena navedene vrste, za katerega bodo veljale manj stroge zahteve, za obdobje do 15. junija 2005.
In addition, other Member States irrespective of whether the seed was harvested in a Member State or in a third country covered by Council Decision 2003/17/EC of 16 December 2002 on the equivalence of field inspections carried out in third countries on seed-producing crops and the equivalence of seed produced in third countries [2] which are in a position to supply Austria with seed of that species, should be authorised to permit the marketing of such seed.
Poleg tega bi morale biti druge države članice, ki lahko oskrbijo Avstrijo s semenom navedene vrste, pooblaščene, da dovolijo trženje takega semena, ne glede na to, ali je bilo le-to požeto v državi članici ali v tretji državi, zajeti v Odločbi Sveta 2003/17/ES z dne 16. decembra 2002 o enakovrednosti poljskih pregledov semenskih posevkov v tretjih državah in o enakovrednosti semena, pridelanega v tretjih državah [2].
It is appropriate that Austria act as coordinator in order to ensure that the total amount of seed authorised pursuant to this Decision does not exceed the maximum quantity covered by this Decision.
Primerno je, da Avstrija prevzame vlogo koordinatorja za zagotovitev, da skupna količina semena, dovoljena v skladu s to odločbo, ne presega največje količine, zajete v tej odločbi.
The marketing in the Community of seed of soya bean (Glycine max) which does not satisfy the minimum germination capacity requirements laid down in Directive 2002/57/EC shall be permitted, for a period expiring on 15 June 2005, in accordance with the terms set out in the Annex to this Decision and subject to the following conditions:
Trženje semena soje (Glycine max), ki ne izpolnjuje zahtev o najmanjši kalivosti iz Direktive 2002/57/ES, se dovoli v Skupnosti za obdobje do 15. junija 2005 v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v Prilogi k tej odločbi in naslednjimi pogoji:
the germination capacity must be at least that set out in the Annex to this Decision,
kalivost mora biti najmanj tolikšna, kot je določeno v Prilogi k tej odločbi;
the official label must state the germination ascertained in the official examination carried out pursuant to Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Directive 2002/57/EC,
uradna etiketa mora navajati kalivost, ugotovljeno pri uradnem pregledu, opravljenem v skladu s členom 2(1)(f) in (g) Direktive 2002/57/ES;
Any seed supplier wishing to place on the market the seeds referred to in Article 1 shall apply for authorisation to the Member State in which he is established or importing.
Vsak dobavitelj semena, ki želi dati na trg seme iz člena 1, vloži zahtevek za dovoljenje pri državi članici, v kateri ima sedež ali v kateri uvaža.
there is sufficient evidence to doubt as to whether the supplier is able to place on the market the amount of seed for which he has applied for authorisation; or
obstajajo zadostni dokazi, da se lahko dvomi, ali je dobavitelj sposoben dati na trg količino semena, za katero je zaprosil za dovoljenje; ali
the total quantity authorised to be marketed pursuant to the derogation concerned would exceed the maximum quantity specified in the Annex.
bi skupna količina, dovoljena za trženje v skladu z zadevnim odstopanjem, presegla največjo količino, določeno v Prilogi.
Austria shall act as coordinating Member State in respect of Article 1 in order to ensure that the total amount authorised does not exceed the maximum quantity specified in the Annex.
Avstrija prevzame vlogo države članice koordinatorke v skladu s členom 1 za zagotovitev, da skupna dovoljena količina ne presega največje količine, določene v Prilogi.
The coordinating Member State shall immediately inform the notifying Member State as to whether authorisation would result in the maximum quantity being exceeded.
Država članica koordinatorka nemudoma obvesti državo članico, katera ji je poslala uradno obvestilo, ali bi dovoljenje privedlo do preseganja največje količine.
Member States shall immediately notify the Commission and the other Member States of the quantities in respect of which they have granted marketing authorisation pursuant to this Decision.
Države članice nemudoma obvestijo Komisijo in druge države članice o količinah, v zvezi s katerimi so izdale dovoljenje za trženje v skladu s to odločbo.
Done at Brussels, 15 April 2005.
V Bruslju, 15. aprila 2005
Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 885/2004 (OJ L 168, 1.5.2004, p. 1).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 885/2004 (UL L 168, 1.5.2004, str. 1).
Type of variety
Sorta
Minimum germination
Najmanjša kalivost
(% of pure seed)
(% čistega semena)
(maturity class: very early) Dolores Gallec, Merlin, OAC Erin
(zrelostni razred: zelo zgodaj) Dolores Gallec, Merlin, OAC Erin
(maturity class: early) Amphor, Essor, Idefix, Kent, London
(zrelostni razred: zgodaj) Amphor, Essor, Idefix, Kent, London
of 18 April 2005
z dne 18. aprila 2005
on the extension of the limited recognition of ‘RINAVE — Registro Internacional Naval, SA’
o podaljšanju omejenega priznanja „RINAVE – Registro Internacional Naval, SA“
(notified under document number C(2005) 1156)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1156)
(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)
(Besedilo v portugalskem jeziku je edino verodostojno)
Having regard to Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations [1], and in particular Article 4(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 94/57/ES z dne 22. novembra 1994 o skupnih predpisih in standardih za organizacije, pooblaščene za inšpekcijski pregled in nadzor ladij, ter za ustrezne ukrepe pomorskih uprav [1] in zlasti člena 4(3) Direktive,
Having regard to the letters dated 25 March 2003 and 8 May 2003 from the Portuguese Authorities, requesting the extension of the limited recognition of ‘RINAVE — Registro Internacional Naval, SA’ (hereafter RINAVE) as per Article 4(2) and (3) of the abovementioned Directive, for unlimited time,
ob upoštevanju pisem portugalskih oblasti z dne 25. marca 2003 in 8. maja 2003, v katerih zahtevajo podaljšanje omejenega priznanja „RINAVE – Registro Internacional Naval, SA“ (v nadaljnjem besedilu „RINAVE“) po členu 4(2) in (3) zgoraj navedene direktive, za nedoločen čas,
The limited recognition under Article 4(3) of Directive 94/57/EC is a recognition granted to organisations (classification societies) which fulfil all criteria other than those set out under paragraphs 2 and 3 of the section ‘General’ of the Annex, but which is limited in time and scope in order for the organisation concerned to further gain experience.
Omejeno priznanje po členu 4(3) Direktive 94/57/ES je priznanje, dodeljeno organizacijam (klasifikacijske družbe), ki izpolnjujejo druga merila, kot so določena po odstavkih 2 in 3 oddelka „Splošno“ Priloge, ki pa ima omejen rok trajanja in obseg, da bi zadevna organizacija pridobila izkušnje.
Commission Decision 2000/481/EC [2] recognised RINAVE on the basis of Article 4(3) for Portugal, for a period of three years.
Odločba Komisije 2000/481/ES [2] z dne 14. julija 2000 je priznala RINAVE na podlagi člena 4(3) za Portugalsko za obdobje treh let.
The Commission has verified that RINAVE meets all criteria of the Annex of the abovementioned Directive other than those set out under paragraphs 2 and 3 of the section ‘General’ of the Annex, including the new provisions referred to in Article 4(5).
Komisija je preverila, ali RINAVE izpolnjuje vsa merila iz Priloge zgoraj navedene direktive, izvzeta so tista iz odstavkov 2 in 3 oddelka „Splošno“ Priloge, vključno z novimi določbami iz člena 4(5).
The assessment carried out by the Commission has furthermore revealed the organisation’s dependence on the technical rules of another recognised organisation.
Ocenjevanje, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, je poleg tega pokazalo odvisnost organizacije od tehničnih pravil druge priznane organizacije.
During the period 2000 to 2003, the safety and pollution prevention performance records of RINAVE as published by the Paris Memorandum of Understanding have consistently been of the highest level.
V obdobju 2000–2003 so bili zapisi RINAVE o izvajanju varnosti in preprečevanja onesnaževanja, kot so objavljeni v Pariškem memorandumu o soglasju, dosledno na najvišji ravni.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee set out in Article 7 of Directive 94/57/EC,
Ukrepi, predvideni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem odbora, ustanovljenega v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 94/57/ES –
The limited recognition of ‘RINAVE — Registro Internacional Naval, SA’ is extended pursuant to Article 4(3) of Directive 94/57/EC for a period of three years as from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Omejeno priznanje „RINAVE – Registro Internacional Naval, SA“ se v skladu s členom 4(3) Direktive 94/57/ES podaljša za obdobje treh let od dneva, ko je sprejeta ta odločba.
The effects of the extended recognition are limited to Portugal.
To podaljšano priznanje velja za Portugalsko.
Done at Brussels, 18 April 2005.
V Bruslju, 18. aprila 2005
OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20.
UL L 319, 12.12.1994, str. 20.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 53).
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/84/ES (UL L 324, 29.11.2002, str. 53).
OJ L 193, 29.7.2000, p. 91.
UL L 193, 29.7.2000, str. 91.
concerning the aid which Italy is planning to implement in order to tackle the peach-growing crisis in Piedmont
o načrtovani pomoči Italije za reševanje kriznih razmer pri gojenju breskev v Piemontu
(notified under document number C(2004) 473)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 473)
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 88(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 88(2)(1) Pogodbe,
After having asked the parties concerned to submit their comments in accordance with that Article,
po pozivu zadevnim strankam, da podajo pripombe skladno z navedenim členom,
By letter dated 20 September 2002, recorded as received on 25 September 2002, the Italian Permanent Representation to the European Union notified the Commission of aid intended to tackle the peach-growing crisis in Piedmont.
V pismu z dne 20. septembra 2002, prejetim dne 25. septembra 2002, je stalno predstavništvo Italije v Evropski skupnosti obvestilo Komisijo o pomoči, ki je namenjena reševanju kriznih razmer pri gojenju breskev v Piemontu.