natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to information received from Spain, the reported losses for the civil activities for the year 2000, in Table 1 above, do not include the repayment of the above-mentioned loans.
V skladu s podatki, ki jih je predložila Španija, navedene izgube civilnih dejavnosti za leto 2000 v gornji preglednici 1 ne vključujejo vračila zgoraj omenjenih posojil.
It is evident that funds provided by SEPI in 1999 benefited the civil companies Juliana, Cadiz and Manises.
Očitno je, da so od sredstev, ki jih je zagotovil SEPI v letu 1999, imele korist civilne družbe Juliana, Cadiz in Manises.
However, since the repayment of these loans was made from the general accounts of IZAR, the effect is that the three companies, later dissolved into business units, benefited from not having to repay the concerned loans.
Vendar pa je, ker se je vračilo teh posojil izvedlo iz splošnih računov družbe IZAR, tem trem družbam, ki so pozneje razpadle v enote gospodarstva, ni bilo treba vrniti zadevnih posojil.
It is thus clear that it was IZAR, which through the payment from its own resources, alleviated Juliana, Cadiz and Manises from the financial burden to repay the loans.
Tako je jasno, da je IZAR s plačilom iz lastnih sredstev rešil družbe Juliana, Cadiz in Manises finančnega bremena, da bi morale vrniti posojila.
The Commission has assessed whether the loans repaid by IZAR could have been financed with funds received through a new loan taken by IZAR on market conditions.
Komisija je preučila, ali bi bilo dolgove, ki jih je vrnil IZAR, mogoče financirati iz sredstev, ki jih je IZAR prejel z novim posojilom v tržnih pogojih.
Concerning this aspect the Commission considers that without the capital injection in the year 2000, which has been shown above to have been used to support the civil activities of IZAR, IZAR’s financial situation would have been much worse than it was.
Glede tega vidika Komisija meni, da bi bila finančna situacija družbe IZAR brez denarnega zneska v letu 2000, ki je bil zgoraj prikazan, kot da je bil uporabljen za podpiranje civilnih dejavnosti družbe IZAR, mnogo slabša, kot je bila.
For this reason it can be excluded that IZAR could have received a loan on market condition if it had not received the illegal and incompatible aid in the form of EUR 364 million of the capital injection.
Zato lahko izključimo, da bi IZAR lahko prejel posojilo pod tržnimi pogoji, če ne bi prejel nezakonite in nezdružljive pomoči v obliki denarnega zneska v višini 364 milijonov EUR.
The repayment of EUR 192,1 million by IZAR to SEPI should therefore be considered as a further use of the capital injection under investigation to the benefit of IZAR’s civil activities.
Vračilo 192,1 milijona EUR s strani družbe IZAR družbi SEPI se zato lahko šteje kot nadaljnja uporaba preučevanega denarnega zneska v korist civilnih dejavnosti družbe IZAR.
For the same reasons as outlined above for the loss coverage, this use of funds for the civil activities did not comply with the market economy investor principle and the corresponding amount used from the capital injected to IZAR constitutes incompatible State aid to IZAR.
Takšna uporaba sredstev za civilne dejavnosti iz istih razlogov, kot so zgoraj navedeni za kritje izgube, ni bila v skladu z načelom vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu in ustrezen znesek, ki se je uporabil iz kapitala, vloženega v IZAR, predstavlja nezdružljivo državno pomoč družbi IZAR.
Based on the above assessment the Commission concludes that IZAR’s civil activities have benefited from the capital injection provided from SEPI to IZAR in year 2000, by receiving loss coverage of EUR 364 million as outlined in paragraph 48 above, plus the aid repayment of EUR 192,1 million as outlined in paragraph 51 above.
Komisija na osnovi gornje ocene ugotavlja, da so imele civilne dejavnosti družbe IZAR korist od denarnega zneska, ki ga je SEPI leta 2000 zagotovil družbi IZAR v obliki prejema kritja izgube v višini 364 milijonov EUR, kot je določeno v gornjem odstavku 48, in vračila pomoči v višini 192,1 milijona EUR, kot je določeno v gornjem odstavku 51.
The total aid amount is thus EUR 556,1 million. The additional capital injections in 2001 and 2002 from SEPI to IZAR were used to cover unexpected increased costs for pre-pensions in the former military shipyards and do not constitute aid.
Višina skupne pomoči je bila tako 556,1 milijona EUR. Dodatni denarni zneski v letih 2001 in 2002 družbe SEPI, namenjeni družbi IZAR, so nameravali kriti nepričakovano povečanje stroškov za predčasna upokojevanja zaposlenih v nekdanjih vojaških ladjedelnicah in ne predstavljajo pomoči.
RECOVERY OF RESTRUCTURING AID ALREADY GRANTED AND APPROVED IN 1997
VRAČILO POMOČI ZA PRESTRUKTURIRANJE, KI JE ŽE BILA ZAGOTOVLJENA IN ODOBRENA V LETU 1997
Since the doubts of further incompatible State aid to the public Spanish civil shipyards have been confirmed, the Commission must assess, as noted in the opening of the procedure, whether some of the restructuring aid granted in 1997 will be considered to be incompatible and be recovered.
Ker so se potrdili dvomi o nadaljnji nezdružljivi državni pomoči španskim civilnim ladjedelnicam, mora Komisija, kot je bilo opozorjeno v začetku postopka, oceniti, ali se bo katera od pomoči za prestrukturiranje iz leta 1997 štela za nezdružljivo in jo bo treba vrniti.
On this issue, the Commission considers that, taking into consideration the comments made by Spain and IZAR in the context of this procedure, there is no grounds to consider part of the restructuring aid authorised in 1997 to be incompatible.
Komisija o tej zadevi meni, da ob upoštevanju pripomb, ki sta jih v okviru tega postopka predložila Španija in IZAR, ni podlage za štetje dela pomoči za prestrukturiranje, odobrene v letu 1997, kot nezdružljivo.
The reason is that, according to the decision [19] authorising the aid, the Commission’s right to request recovery of the aid authorised in 1997 expired with the last monitoring report [20], dated 13 October 1999.
Razlog je, da je v skladu z odločbo [19] o zagotovitvi pomoči pravica Komisije, da zahteva vračilo pomoči, odobrene v letu 1997, izgubila veljavo z zadnjim poročilom spremljanja [20] z dne 13. oktobra 1999.
Therefore, the aid approved in 1997 became existing aid once the monitoring period expired.
Zato je pomoč, odobrena v letu 1997, po preteku obdobja spremljanja postala obstoječa pomoč.
ARTICLE 296
ČLEN 296
Spain claims that the capital injection would fall under Article 296 and thus outside the scope of the state aid rules, since BAZAN was a military company at the time of the acquisition of the yards.
Španija trdi, da sodi denarni znesek v člen 296 in tako zunaj področja pravil o državni pomoči, saj je bil BAZAN v času pridobitve sredstev vojaška družba.
It cannot be disputed that the civil activities needed financial aid in order to continue operations after July 2000.
Nesporno so civilne dejavnosti potrebovale finančno pomoč, da bi po juliju 2000 nadaljevale z delovanjem.
The mere fact that they were part of a shipbuilding company, which was involved in military construction, does not alter the nature of these shipyards and related activities.
Samo dejstvo, da so bile del ladjedelniške družbe, ki je bila vključena v vojaške konstrukcije, ne spremeni narave teh ladjedelnic in sorodnih dejavnosti.
Therefore aid to such activities falls under Article 87 of the Treaty.
Zato sodi pomoč za take dejavnosti v člen 87 Pogodbe.
The Commission concludes that Spain has unlawfully implemented aid of a sum of 556 million euro in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Komisija je ugotovila, da je Španija nezakonito uporabila pomoč v višini 556 milijonov EUR, kar pomeni kršitev člena 88(3) Pogodbe.
This has been provided in the form of: Capital injection of 1322 million euro from SEPI to IZAR, in year 2000, out of which 556,1 million euro benefited the civil activities of IZAR.
Ta je bila odobrena v obliki denarnega zneska v višini 1322 milijonov EUR, ki ga je v letu 2000 SEPI vložil v IZAR, od česar so imele civilne dejavnosti družbe IZAR korist v višini 556,1 milijona EUR.
The aid should be recovered in their totality from the current owners of these activities, IZAR,
Pomoč morajo v celoti vrniti sedanji lastniki teh dejavnosti, torej družba IZAR –
The State aid amounting to EUR 556,1 million euro unlawfully granted by Spain, in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty, in favour of IZAR is incompatible with the common market.
Državna pomoč v višini 556,1 milijona EUR, ki jo je Španija nezakonito zagotovila ob kršitvi člena 88(3) Pogodbe v korist družbe IZAR, je nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom.
Spain shall take all necessary measures to recover from IZAR the aid referred to in Article 1 and unlawfully made available to the beneficiary.
Španija bo izvedla vse potrebne ukrepe, da bo IZAR vrnil pomoč iz člena 1, ki je bila upravičencu na voljo nezakonito.
Recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures under national law, provided these allow the immediate and effective implementation of this Decision.
Vračilo se izvede nemudoma v skladu s postopki po nacionalni zakonodaji, če ti dopuščajo takojšnjo in učinkovito izvršbo te odločbe.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest throughout the period running from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery.
Vsote za vračilo vključujejo obresti za vse obdobje od datuma, ko so bila sredstva na voljo upravičencu, do datuma njihovega dejanskega vračila.
The interest rate to be applied will be the reference rate used for calculating the grant equivalent of regional aid.
Obrestna mera za izračun je referenčna stopnja za izračunavanje ekvivalenta regionalne pomoči.
The interest rate referred to in paragraph 4 will be applied on a compound basis throughout the entire period referred to in paragraph 3.
Obrestna mera, na katero se sklicuje v odstavku 4, se izračuna ob uporabi obrestno obrestnega računa za vse obdobje, na katerega se sklicuje v odstavku 3.
Spain shall inform the Commission, within two months following notification of this Decision, of the measures already taken and planned to comply with it.
Španija mora obvestiti Komisijo v dveh mesecih po obvestilu o tej odločbi o načrtovanih in že izvedenih ukrepih za izvršbo te odločbe.
It will provide this information using the questionnaire attached in the Annex of this Decision.
Te podatke posreduje z vprašalnikom, priloženim v Prilogi I k tej odločbi.
OJ C 21, 24.1.2004, p. 42, Case T-382/03.
UL C 21, 24.1.2004, str. 42, zadeva T-382/03.
OJ C 199, 23.8.2003, p. 9.
UL C 199, 23.8.2003, str. 9.
OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22 (see the last sentence: ‘The present notice is without prejudice to the interpretation of Council and Commission regulations in the field of State aid.’)
UL C 119, 22.5.2002, str. 22 (ref. zadnji stavek: „Sedanje obvestilo ne vpliva na razlago uredb Sveta in Komisije na področju državnih pomoči.“).
ECR I-03271, paragraph 50.
ECR I-03271, odstavek 50.
ECR I-04397, paragraphs 55 to 56.
ECR I-04397, odstavka 55–56.
OJ L 37, 12.2.2000, p. 22.
UL L 37, 12.2.2000, str. 22..
ECR 2321.
ECR 2321.
The results in this table do not take into account losses incurred by Sestao, Puerto Real and Sevilla covered by the extraordinary gains referred to in paragraphs 46 and 51 below.
Rezultati v tej preglednici ne upoštevajo izgub, nastalih pri ladjedelnicah Sestao, Puerto Real in Sevilla, ki so jih krili izjemni dobički iz spodnjih odstavkov 46 in 51.
Case C-342/96 Spain v Commission [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraphs 41 and 42, and Case C-256/97 DMT [1999] ECR I-3913, paragraphs 22 to 24 and the opinion of AG Jacobs in that case, paragraphs 34 to 36.
Zadeva C-342/96 Španija proti Komisiji, (1999) ECR I-2459, odstavka 41 in 42, in zadeva C-256/97 DMT, (1999) ECR I-3913, odstavki 22–24, in mnenje generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa o tej zadevi, odstavki 34 do 36.
OJ C 354, 21.11.1997, p. 2, see the penultimate paragraph on page 7.
UL C 354, 21.11.1997, str. 2, ref. predzadnji odstavek na strani 7.
INFORMATION REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION DECISION C(2004) 3918
PODATKI O IZVAJANJU ODLOČBE KOMISIJE K(2004) 3918
Calculation of the amount to be recovered
Izračun višine vračila
Please provide the following details on the amount of unlawful State aid that has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary:
Prosimo, zagotovite naslednje podrobnosti o višini nezakonite državne pomoči, ki je bila na razpolago upravičencu:
Date(s) of payment [1]
Datum(-i) plačila [1]
Identity of beneficiary
Podatki o upravičencu
Please explain in detail how the interests to be paid on the amount of aid to be recovered will be calculated?
Prosimo, da podrobno razložite, kako se bodo izračunale obresti, ki bodo plačane z ozirom na vrnjen znesek pomoči.
Measures planned and already taken to recover the aid
Načrtovani in že sprejeti ukrepi za vračilo pomoči
Please describe in detail what measures have already been taken and what measures are planned to effect an immediate and effective recovery of the aid.
Prosimo, da podrobno razložite, kateri ukrepi so že bili sprejeti in kateri ukrepi so načrtovani, da bodo vplivali na takojšnje in učinkovito vračilo pomoči.
Please also explain what alternative measures are available under national law to effect recovery?
Prosimo, da razložite, kateri alternativni ukrepi so na voljo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, ki bi lahko imeli učinek na vračilo.
Please also indicate where relevant the legal basis for the measures taken/planned.
Prosimo, da navedete tudi pravni temelj sprejetih/načrtovanih ukrepov, kjer je potrebno.
By what date will the recovery of the aid be completed?
Kdaj bo vračilo pomoči dokončno izvedeno?
Recovery already effected
Že realizirano vračilo
Please provide the following details on the amounts of aid that have been recovered from the beneficiary:
Prosimo, zagotovite naslednje podrobnosti o višini pomoči, ki jo je vrnil upravičenec:
Date(s) [3]
Datum(-i) [3]
Amount of aid repaid
Višina vrnjene pomoči
Please attach information documenting the repayment of the aid amounts specified in the table under point 3.1 above.
Prosimo, priložite podatke, ki dokazujejo vračilo zneskov pomoči, navedenih v preglednici pod zgornjo točko 3.1.
Date(s) on which (individual instalments of) the aid has been put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in so far as a measure consists of several instalments and reimbursements, use separate rows).
Datum(-i), ko je bila pomoč (oz. posamezni obroki pomoči) na razpolago upravičencu (če je ukrep sestavljen iz več obrokov in so vračila ločena).
Amount of aid put at the disposal of the beneficiary (in gross aid equivalents).
Višina pomoči na voljo upravičencu (v ekvivalentih bruto pomoči).
Date(s) on which the aid has been repaid.
Datum(-i) izplačanega vračila pomoči.
80,2– ted results of IZAR’s civil activities 2000 to 2003 [17]
80,2– ni rezultati civilnih dejavnosti družbe IZAR med letoma 2000 in 2003 [17]
103,6– ed results of IZAR’s civil activities 2000 to 2003 [17]
103,6– i rezultati civilnih dejavnosti družbe IZAR med letoma 2000 in 2003 [17]
290,1– ed results of IZAR’s civil activities 2000 to 2003 [17]
290,1– i rezultati civilnih dejavnosti družbe IZAR med letoma 2000 in 2003 [17]
Furthermore, SEPI has a history of behaviour towards the shipyards which has been carried out in a manner that can be considered imputable to the State, such as providing part of the authorised restructuring aid in 1997 and unlawful aid in 1998 [12]. It can also be noted that SEPI in other circumstances provides State aid, such as to the Spanish coal industry [13].
Poleg tega je bilo v preteklosti ravnanje družbe SEPI do ladjedelnic tako, da ga je mogoče pripisati državi, kot na primer zagotovitev dela odobrene pomoči za prestrukturiranje leta 1997 in nezakonite pomoči leta 1998 [12] Mogoče je opozoriti tudi na to, da SEPI v drugačnih okoliščinah zagotavlja državno pomoč, na primer španskemu premogovništvu [13].
The market economy investor principle is explained in detail in the Commission communication to the Member States [14] on the Application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC of 25 June 1980 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector [15]. The Court has also, e.g. in Case C-40/85 [16] stated that the appropriate ways of establishing whether the measure is State aid is to apply the criterion to what extent the undertaking would be able to obtain the sums in question on the private capital markets at the same conditions.
Načelo vlagatelja v tržnem gospodarstvu je podrobno razloženo v sporočilu Komisije državam članicam [14] o uporabi členov 92 in 93 Pogodbe EGS in člena 5 Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS z dne 25. junija 1980 o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji [15] Sodišče je tudi navedlo, npr. v zadevi C-40/85 [16], da je ustrezni način ugotavljanja, ali je ukrep državna pomoč, uporaba merila, v kolikšni meri bi podjetje zmoglo pridobiti zadevne zneske ob enakih pogojih na zasebnih kapitalskih trgih.
Political and Security Committee Decision Darfur/1/2005
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora Darfur/1/2005
appointing a Military Adviser to the European Union Special Representative for Sudan
o imenovanju vojaškega svetovalca posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za Sudan
(2005/653/CFSP)
(2005/653/SZVP)
Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 25 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti tretjega odstavka člena 25 Pogodbe,
Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP of 18 July 2005 on the European Union civilian-military supporting action to the African Union mission in the Darfur region of Sudan [1], and in particular Article 4 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2005/557/SZVP z dne 18. julija 2005 o civilno-vojaškem podpornem ukrepu Evropske unije misiji Afriške unije v regiji Darfur v Sudanu [1], in zlasti člena 4 Skupnega ukrepa,
On 18 July 2005 the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/556/CFSP appointing a Special Representative of the European Union (EUSR) for Sudan [2].
Svet je 18. julija 2005 sprejel Skupni ukrep 2005/556/SZVP o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije (PPEU) za Sudan [2].
The EUSR ensures the coordination and coherence of the EU contributions to AMIS.
PPEU zagotavlja usklajevanje in doslednost prispevkov EU za AMIS.
Under the authority of the EUSR an EU Coordination Cell in Addis Ababa (ACC), which comprises a Political Adviser, a Military Adviser and a Police Adviser, manages day-to-day coordination with all relevant EU actors and with the Administrative Control and Management Centre (ACMC) within the chain of command of the African Union in Addis Ababa in order to ensure coherence and timely EU support to AMIS II.
Celica EU za usklajevanje v Adis Abebi (ACC), ki jo sestavljajo politični, vojaški in policijski svetovalec, pod vodstvom PPEU opravlja vsakodnevno usklajevanje z vsemi zadevnimi akterji EU in s Centrom za upravno kontrolo in upravljanje (ACMC) v okviru strukture poveljevanja Afriške unije v Adis Abebi, z namenom zagotavljanja dosledne in pravočasne pomoči EU misiji AMIS II.
The Military Adviser to the EUSR helps to ensure the coherence of the military component of the EU supporting action in Addis Ababa and is responsible for managing day-to-day coordination of the military component of the EU supporting action with the ACMC.
Vojaški svetovalec PPEU pomaga zagotavljati doslednost vojaške komponente ukrepa podpore EU v Adis Abebi in je odgovoren za opravljanje vsakodnevnega usklajevanja vojaške komponente ukrepa podpore EU z ACMC.
The Secretary General/High Representative, following the recommendation of the EUSR, has proposed that Colonel Philippe Mendez should be appointed as Military Adviser to the EUSR.
Generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik je po priporočilu PPEU predlagal, da se polkovnik Philippe Mendez imenuje za vojaškega svetovalca PPEU.
Pursuant to Article 4 of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP the Council has authorised the Political and Security Committee to appoint the Military Adviser to the EUSR.
V skladu s členom 4 Skupnega ukrepa 2005/557/SZVP je Svet pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor za imenovanje vojaškega svetovalca PPEU.
In conformity with Article 6 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the European Union which have defence implications,
V skladu s členom 6 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, Danska ne sodeluje pri sprejemanju in izvajanju sklepov in ukrepov Evropske unije, ki so obrambnega pomena –
Colonel Philippe MENDEZ is hereby appointed Military Adviser to the EUSR for Sudan.
Polkovnik Philippe MENDEZ je imenovan za vojaškega svetovalca PPEU za Sudan.
OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 46.
UL L 188, 20.7.2005, str. 46.
OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 43.
UL L 188, 20.7.2005, str. 43.
Political and Security Committee Decision Darfur/2/2005
Sklep Političnega in varnostnega odbora Darfur/2/2005
appointing a Head of the EU Police Team/Police Advisor to the European Union Special Representative for Sudan
o imenovanju vodje policijske skupine EU/policijskega svetovalca posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za Sudan
(2005/654/CFSP)
(2005/654/SZVP)
The EUSR ensures the coordination and coherence of the EU contributions to AMIS.
PPEU zagotavlja usklajevanje in doslednost prispevkov EU za misijo AMIS.
Under the authority of the EUSR an EU Coordination Cell in Addis Ababa (ACC), which comprises a political advisor, a military advisor and a police advisor, manages day-to-day coordination with all relevant EU actors and with the Administrative Control and Management Centre (ACMC) within the chain of command of the African Union in Addis Ababa in order to ensure coherence and timely EU support to AMIS II.
Celica EU za usklajevanje v Addis Abebi (ACC), ki jo sestavljajo politični, vojaški in policijski svetovalec, pod vodstvom PPEU opravlja vsakodnevno usklajevanje z vsemi zadevnimi akterji EU in s Centrom za upravno kontrolo in upravljanje (ACMC) v okviru strukture poveljevanja Afriške unije v Adis Abebi, z namenom zagotavljanja dosledne in pravočasne pomoči EU misiji AMIS II.
The Police Advisor to the EUSR, who is also the Head of the EU Police Team, is responsible for managing day-to-day coordination of the EU police supporting actions.
Policijski svetovalec PPEU, ki je obenem vodja policijske skupine EU, je odgovoren za opravljanje vsakodnevnega usklajevanja policijskih ukrepov podpore EU.
The Head of the EU Police Team/Police Advisor assumes day-to-day management of the police component of the supporting action and is responsible for staff and disciplinary matters.
Vodja policijske skupine EU/policijski svetovalec opravlja vsakodnevno upravljanje policijske komponente ukrepa podpore ter je odgovoren za osebje in disciplinske zadeve.
The Secretary General/High Representative, following the recommendation by the EUSR, has proposed that Douglas Brand should be appointed as Head of the EU Police Team/Police Advisor to the EUSR.
Generalni sekretar/visoki predstavnik je po priporočilu PPEU predlagal, da se Douglas Brand imenuje za vodjo policijske skupine EU/policijskega svetovalca PPEU.
Pursuant to Article 4 of Joint Action 2005/557/CFSP the Council has authorised the Political and Security Committee to appoint the Head of EU Police Team/Police Advisor to the EUSR,
V skladu s členom 4 Skupnega ukrepa 2005/557/SZVP je Svet pooblastil Politični in varnostni odbor (PVO), da imenuje vodjo policijske skupine EU/policijskega svetovalca PPEU –
Douglas BRAND is hereby appointed Head of the EU Police Team/Police Advisor to the EUSR for Sudan.
Douglas BRAND je imenovan za vodjo policijske skupine EU/policijskega svetovalca PPEU za Sudan.
on the aid scheme implemented by Italy providing for tax credits for investments
o shemi pomoči s strani Italije za davčne dobropise za naložbe
(notified under document number C(2004) 2638)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 2638)