natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An inspection has been carried out on behalf of the Commission in Grenada to verify the conditions under which fishery products are produced, stored and dispatched to the Community.
V imenu Komisije je bil v Grenadi opravljen inšpekcijski pregled, ki je preveril pogoje, pod katerimi se ribiški proizvodi proizvajajo, skladiščijo in odpošiljajo v Skupnost.
The requirements in the legislation of Grenada on health inspection and monitoring of fishery products may be considered equivalent to those laid down in Directive 91/493/EEC.
Zahteve v grenadski zakonodaji v zvezi z zdravstveno inšpekcijo in spremljanjem ribiških proizvodov se lahko štejejo za enakovredne zahtevam iz Direktive 91/493/EGS.
In particular, the ‘Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)’ is capable of effectively verifying the implementation of the rules in force.
Zlasti „Public Health Department (PHD)“ v okviru „Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)“ lahko učinkovito preverja izvajanje veljavnih pravil.
The PHD-MHE has provided official assurances on compliance with the standards for health controls and monitoring of fishery products as set out in Chapter V of the Annex to Directive 91/493/EEC and on the fulfilment of hygienic requirements equivalent to those laid down by that Directive.
PHD-MHE je predložil uradna zagotovila glede skladnosti s standardi zdravstvenega nadzora in spremljanja ribiških proizvodov, kot določa poglavje V Priloge k Direktivi 91/493/EGS, in izpolnjevanja higienskih zahtev, enakovrednih tistim iz navedene direktive.
It is appropriate to lay down detailed provisions concerning fishery products imported into the Community from Grenada, in accordance with Directive 91/493/EEC.
Glede ribiških proizvodov, uvoženih v Skupnost iz Grenade, je primerno predpisati podrobne določbe v skladu z Direktivo 91/493/EGS.
Those lists should be drawn up on the basis of a communication from the PHD-MHE to the Commission.
Navedena seznama je treba sestaviti na podlagi obvestila, ki ga PHD-MHE pošlje Komisiji.
The ‘Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)’shall be the competent authority in Grenada identified for the purposes of verifying and certifying compliance of fishery products with the requirements of Directive 91/493/EEC.
„Public Health Department (PHD)“ v okviru „Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)“ je pristojni organ v Grenadi za preverjanje in potrjevanje skladnosti ribiških proizvodov z zahtevami iz Direktive 91/493/EGS.
Fishery products imported into the Community from Grenada shall meet the requirements set out in Articles 3, 4 and 5.
Ribiški proizvodi, uvoženi v Skupnost iz Grenade, morajo ustrezati zahtevam iz členov 3, 4 in 5.
The health certificate shall bear the name, capacity and signature of the representative of the PHD-MHE, and the latter’s official stamp in a colour different from that of the endorsements.
Zdravstveno spričevalo vsebuje ime, položaj in podpis predstavnika PHD-MHE in njegov uradni žig, ki je drugačne barve od drugih zaznamkov na spričevalu.
All packages shall bear the word ‘GRENADA’ and the approval/registration number of the establishment, factory vessel, cold store or freezer vessel of origin in indelible letters, except in the case of frozen fishery products in bulk and intended for the manufacture of preserved foods.
Na vseh pakiranjih je z neizbrisnimi črkami napisana beseda „GRENADA“ in številka odobritve/registrska številka izvornega obrata, predelovalnega plovila, hladilnice ali zamrzovalnega plovila, razen v primeru zamrznjenih ribiških proizvodov v razsutem stanju, ki so namenjeni proizvodnji konzervirane hrane.
for fishery products from Grenada and intended for export to the European Community, excluding bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods in whatever form
za ribiške proizvode iz Grenade, namenjene izvozu v Evropsko skupnost, z izjemo školjk, iglokožcev, plaščarjev in morskih polžev v kakršni koli obliki
Public Health Department (PHD) under the Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)
„Public Health Department (PHD)“ v okviru „Ministry of Health and the Environment (MHE)“
Description of fishery/aquaculture (1) products:
Opis ribiškkih proizvodov/proizvodov iz ribogojstva (1):
Name(s) and official approval/registration number(s) of establishment(s), factory vessel(s), or cold store(s) approved or freezer vessel(s) registered by PHD-MHE for export to the EC:
Ime(-na) in številka(-e) uradne odobritve obrata(-ov), predelovalnega(-ih) plovila(-vil) ali hladilnice(-nic), ki ga/jo(jih) je odobril, ali zamrzovalnega(-ih) plovila(-vil), ki ga(jih) je registriral PHD-MHE za izvoz v ES:
The undersigned official inspector hereby declares that he is aware of the provisions of Directives 91/493/EEC and 92/48/EEC and Decision 2005/500/EC.
Podpisani uradni inšpektor izjavlja, da je seznanjen z določbami direktiv 91/493/EGS in 92/48/EGS ter Odločbe 2005/500/ES.
PP Processing plant
PP predelovalni obrat (processing plant)
ZV Freezer vessel
ZV zamrzovalno plovilo (freezer vessel)
A Cold store only
A samo za hladilnico
amending Decision 97/296/EC drawing up the list of third countries from which the import of fishery products is authorised for human consumption, with respect to Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada
o spremembi Odločbe 97/296/ES o določitvi seznama tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi, glede Alžirije, Bahamov in Grenade
(notified under document number C(2005) 2551)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 2551)
Having regard to Council Decision 95/408/EC of 22 June 1995 on the conditions for drawing up, for an interim period, provisional lists of third country establishments from which Member States are authorised to import certain products of animal origin, fishery products or live bivalve molluscs [1], and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 95/408/ES z dne 22. junija 1995 o pogojih za sestavo začasnih seznamov obratov tretjih držav, iz katerih države članice lahko uvažajo nekatere proizvode živalskega izvora, ribiške proizvode ali žive školjke [1], in zlasti člena 2(2) Odločbe,
Commission Decision 97/296/EC of 22 April 1997 drawing up the list of third countries from which the import of fishery products is authorised for human consumption [2], lists the countries and territories from which import of fishery products for human consumption is authorised.
Odločba Komisije 97/296/ES z dne 22. aprila 1997 o določitvi seznama tretjih držav, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi [2], navaja seznam držav in ozemelj, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških proizvodov za prehrano ljudi.
Part I of the Annex to that Decision lists the countries and territories covered by a specific Decision under Council Directive 91/493/EEC of 22 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and the placing on the market of fishery products [3], and part II of that Annex lists the countries and territories meeting the conditions set out in Article 2(2) of Decision 95/408/EC.
Del I Priloge k navedeni odločbi navaja države in ozemlja iz posebne odločbe na podlagi Direktive Sveta 91/493/EGS z dne 22. julija 1991 o zdravstvenih pogojih za proizvodnjo in dajanje na trg ribiških proizvodov [3], del II navedene priloge pa navaja seznam držav in ozemelj, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 2(2) Odločbe 95/408/ES.
Commission Decisions 2005/498/EC [4], 2005/499/EC [5] and 2005/500/EC [6], set specific import conditions for fishery products from Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada.
Odločbe Komisije 2005/498/ES [4], 2005/499/ES [5] in 2005/500/ES [6] določajo posebne uvozne pogoje za ribiške proizvode iz Alžirije, Bahamov in Grenade.
Those countries should therefore be included in the list in part I of the Annex to Decision 97/296/EC.
Navedene države je torej treba dodati na seznam v delu I Priloge k Odločbi 97/296/ES.
In the interest of clarity, the lists concerned should be replaced in their entirety.
Zaradi jasnosti je treba zadevne sezname nadomestiti v celoti.
This Decision should apply from the same day as Decisions 2005/498/EC, 2005/499/EC and 2005/500/EC as regards the import of fishery products from Algeria, the Bahamas and Grenada.
Ta odločba se uporablja od istega dne kot odločbe 2005/498/ES, 2005/499/ES in 2005/500/ES glede uvoza ribiških proizvodov iz Alžirije, Bahamov in Grenade.
The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,
Ukrepi, določeni s to odločbo, so v skladu z mnenjem Stalnega odbora za prehranjevalno verigo in zdravje živali –
This Decision shall apply from 28 August 2005.
Ta odločba velja od 28. avgusta 2005.
Decision as last amended by Directive 2004/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p. 33) (corrected version in OJ L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 12).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/41/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str. 33) (popravljena različica v UL L 195, 2.6.2004, str. 12).
Decision as last amended by Decision 2005/219/EC (OJ L 69, 16.3.2005, p. 55).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo 2005/219/ES (UL L 69, 16.3.2005, str. 55).
See page 92 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 92 tega Uradnega lista.
See page 99 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 99 tega Uradnega lista.
See page 104 of this Official Journal.
Glej stran 104 tega Uradnega lista.
list of countries and territories from which importation of fishery products in any form intended for human consumption is authorised
Seznam držav in območij, iz katerih je dovoljen uvoz ribiških izdelkov v kateri koli obliki za prehrano ljudi
I. Countries and territories covered by a specific decision pursuant to Council Directive 91/493/EEC
I. Države in območja iz posebne odločbe, skladne z Direktivo Sveta 91/493/EGS
BD — Bangladesh
BD – Bangladeš
BS — The Bahamas
BS – Bahami
BZ — Belize
BZ – Beliz
CI — Ivory Coast
CI – Slonokoščena obala
CN — China
CN – Kitajska
CS — Serbia and Montenegro [1]CU — Cuba
CS – Srbija in Črna Gora [1]CU – Kuba
CV — Cape Verde
CV – Zelenortski otoki
EC — Ecuador
EC – Ekvador
EG — Egypt
EG – Egipt
GH — Ghana
GH – Gana
GM — Gambia
GM – Gambija
GN — Guinea Conakry
GN – Gvineja
GY — Guyana
GY – Gvajana
ID — Indonesia
ID – Indonezija
KR — South Korea
KR – Južna Koreja
KZ — Kazakhstan
KZ – Kazahstan
LK — Sri Lanka
LK – Šrilanka
MR — Mauritania
MR – Mavretanija
MV — Maldives
MV – Maldivi
NG — Nigeria
NG – Nigerija
PG — Papua New Guinea
PG – Papua Nova Gvineja
PH — Philippines
PH – Filipini
PM — St Pierre and Miquelon
PM – St Pierre & Miquelon
SA — Singapore
SA – Savdska Arabija
SC — Seychelles
SC – Sejšeli
TZ — Tanzania
TZ – Tanzanija
AM — Armenia [2]AO — Angola
AM – Armenija [2] AO – Angola
CG — Republic of Congo [4]CM — Cameroon
CG – Republika Kongo [4]CM – Kamerun
ER — Eritrea
ER – Eritreja
MM — Myanmar
MM – Mjanmar (Burma)
SB — Solomon Islands
SB – Salomonovi Otoki
SH — St Helena
SH – Sveta Helena
US — United States of America
US – Združene Države Amerike
Authorised only for imports of fishery products caught, frozen and packed in their final packaging at sea.’
Dovoljen samo uvoz ribiških proizvodov, ujetih, zamrznjenih in dokončno pakiranih na morju“.
relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.37.750/B2 — Brasseries Kronenbourg — Brasseries Heineken)
v zvezi s postopkom na podlagi člena 81 Pogodbe ES (Zadeva COMP/C.37.750/B2 – Brasseries Kronenbourg – Brasseries Heineken)
(notified under document number C(2004) 3597)
(notificirano pod dokumentarno številko K(2004) 3597)
On 29 September 2004, the Commission adopted a decision relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty.
Dne 29. septembra 2004 je Komisija sprejela odločbo v zvezi s postopkom po členu 81 Pogodbe ES.
In accordance with the provisions of Article 30 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 [1], the Commission herewith publishes the names of the parties and the main content of the decision, including any penalties imposed, having regard to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business interests.
V skladu z določbami člena 30 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 [1] Komisija objavlja imena strank in glavno vsebino odločbe, vključno z vsemi naloženimi sankcijami, ob upoštevanju pravnega interesa podjetij do varovanja njihovih poslovnih interesov.
A non-confidential version of the full text of the decision can be found in the authentic languages of the case and in the Commission’s working languages at DG COMP web-site at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.htmlI.
Različica celotnega besedila odločbe, ki ni zaupna, je na voljo v izvirnih jezikih zadeve in v delovnih jezikih Komisije na spletni strani GD COMP: http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/index_en.htmlI.
The decision relates to an ‘armistice’ agreement regarding the sale of beer in France for consumption away from home (on-trade sector).
Odločba se nanaša na sporazum o „premirju“ glede prodaje piva v Franciji za potrošnjo zunaj doma (sektor gostinstvo).
The Commission has gathered evidence showing that on 21 March 1996, the two main brewery groups in France, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA and Heineken France SA (previously: Sogebra) and their respective mother companies at the time of the facts, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV, have concluded this agreement, following an ‘acquisition war’ regarding drinks wholesalers.
Komisija je zbrala dokaze, ki kažejo, da sta 21. marca 1996 dva glavna pivovarniška koncerna v Franciji, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA in Heineken France SA (prej „Sogebra“), in njuni matični družbi v času dogodkov, Groupe Danone in Heineken NV, sklenili ta sporazum po „vojni za prevzeme“ zaradi trgovcev na debelo s pijačami.
The agreement concerns, on the one hand, the acquisition of drinks wholesalers, with the aim of bringing a rapid end to the rising costs of acquiring these companies, and on the other hand, the balancing of the integrated distribution networks of the parties concerned.
Po eni strani sporazum zadeva prevzem trgovcev na debelo s pijačami, da bi se hitro zaustavili naraščajoči stroški nabave teh gospodarskih družb, po drugi strani pa usklajevanje združenega distribucijskega omrežja zadevnih strank.
The ‘armistice’ agreement has, however, never been implemented.
Do izvajanja sporazuma „premirju“ pa nikoli ni prišlo.
SUMMARY OF THE CASE
POVZETEK ZADEVE
Origin of the case and procedural steps
Ozadje zadeve in postopkovni koraki
The case started on the basis of information provided by Interbrew NV (now Inbev NV) in the framework of the Belgian brewery cartel case (Commission Decision 2003/569/EC of 5 December 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty, (Case IV/37.614/F3 PO/Interbrew and Alken-Maes) (OJ L 200, 7.8.2003, p. 1)).
Zadeva se je začela na podlagi podatkov, ki jih je predložil Interbrew NV (zdaj „Inbev NV“) v okviru zadeve o belgijskem pivovarskem kartelu (Odločba Komisije 2003/569/ES z dne 5. decembra 2001 v zvezi s postopkom v skladu s členom 81 Pogodbe ES (Zadeva IV/37.614/F3 PO/Interbrew in Alken-Maes) (UL L 200, 7.8.2003, str. 1)).
On the basis of this information, the Commission conducted several inspections in the year 2000 and has completed its investigation by requests for information.
Na podlagi teh podatkov je Komisija izvedla več inšpekcijskih pregledov v letu 2000 in je zaključila s preiskavo z zahtevki po podatkih.
On February 4, 2004 the Commission opened the proceedings and adopted a statement of objections against Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV.
Dne 4. februarja 2004 je Komisija odprla sodni postopek in sprejela obvestilo o nasprotovanju proti Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA, Groupe Danone in Heineken NV.
All parties have submitted a written reply to the Commission.
Vse stranke so Komisiji predložile pisni odgovor.
They have, however, renounced their right to a hearing.
Vendar so se odrekle pravici do zaslišanja.
The sector concerned
Zadevni sektor
This case concerns the sales of beer in France in the on-trade sector.
Ta zadeva se nanaša na prodajo piva v Franciji v sektorju gostinstvo.
Together, the companies participating in the agreement represented approximately three quarters of the volume of beer consumed in France in 1999.
Skupaj so gospodarske družbe, ki sodelujejo v sporazumu, predstavljale približno tri četrtine količine piva, zaužitega v Franciji leta 1999.
The Commission withheld the following infringement: on 12 February 1996, Heineken NV and Heineken France SA announced their intention to acquire the groups Fischer and Saint Arnould to Groupe Danone and Brasseries Kronenbourg SA.
Komisija je ugotovila naslednjo kršitev: 12. februarja 1996 sta gospodarski družbi Heineken NV in Heineken France SA sporočili Groupe Danone in Brasseries Kronenbourg SA svojo namero o nabavi poslovnih skupin Fischer in Saint Arnould.
Since the groups Fischer and Saint Arnould distributed an important volume of Kronenbourg beer, this triggered a genuine acquisition war.
Ker sta skupini Fischer in Saint Arnould distribuirali pomembno količino piva Kronenbourg, je to sprožilo pravo vojno za prevzeme.
Each brewery group thus acquired a large number of drinks wholesalers, leading to a strong inflation of the acquisition price of such wholesalers.
Vsaka pivovarska skupina je zato prevzela veliko število trgovcev na debelo s pijačami, kar je vodilo k močni inflaciji nabavne cene za takšne trgovce na debelo.
On 21 March 1996, Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, Heineken France SA and their respective mother companies, Groupe Danone and Heineken NV, therefore concluded an ‘armistice’ agreement regarding the acquisition of wholesalers and the balancing of their integrated distribution networks.
Zato sta 21. marca 1996 gospodarski družbi Brasseries Kronenbourg SA in Heineken France SA ter njuni matični družbi Groupe Danone in Heineken NV sklenili sporazum o „premirju“ glede prevzema trgovcev na debelo in usklajevanja njihovega združenega distribucijskega omrežja.
In particular, they agreed on:
Zlasti so se sporazumeli o:
a temporary acquisition stop (prohibition to proceed with acquisitions of wholesalers outside an agreed list),
začasni ustavitvi prevzemov (prepovedi o nadaljevanju prevzemov trgovcev na debelo izven dogovorjenega seznama),
the balancing of the total volume of beer distributed through the network of each party, and
uskladitvi celotne količine piva, distribuiranega v omrežju vsake stranke, in
the balancing of the volume of beer brands commercialised by each party which should be distributed by the other party.
uskladitvi števila blagovnih znamk piva vsake stranke, ki se distribuirajo po prodajnih poteh druge stranke.
The agreement is made clear from an internal note of the group Heineken.
Sporazum je jasno razviden iz internega sporočila poslovne skupine Heineken.
Groupe Danone and Brasseries Kronenbourg SA have moreover not contested the existence of the armistice agreement.
Poleg tega poslovni skupini Groupe Danone in Brasseries Kronenbourg SA nista izpodbijali obstoja sporazuma o „premirju“.
It should however be noted that the Commission does not have any proof of implementation of the agreement.
Vendar je treba omeniti, da Komisija nima nobenega dokazila o izvajanju sporazuma.
On the contrary, certain wholesalers indicated on the agreed list as attributed to one party have finally been acquired by the other party and the parties continued to acquire wholesalers outside the agreed list.
Nasprotno je nazadnje nekatere trgovce na debelo, ki so bili na dogovorjenem seznamu pripisani eni stranki, kupila druga stranka in stranke so nadaljevale z nabavo izven dogovorjenega seznama.
Moreover, in the period from 1996 to 2002, the parties tended to supplant their competitors’ beer by their own beer within the distribution network under their control.
Poleg tega so se v obdobju od leta 1996 do leta 2002 stranke nagibale k nadomeščanju piva konkurentov z lastnim pivom v distribucijskem omrežju pod nadzorom.
An agreement intended to ensure equilibrium between brands thus became pointless.
Sporazum, namenjen zagotavljanju ravnovesja med blagovnimi znamkami, je zato postal brezpredmeten.
Restriction by subject
Namerna omejitev
The ‘armistice’ agreement of 21 March 1996 was first intended to control investment by the Heineken and Danone groups, since its purpose was to bring about a rapid end to the rising cost of acquiring wholesalers.
Sporazum o „premirju“ z dne 21. marca 1996 je bil najprej namenjen nadzoru naložb poslovnih skupin Heineken in Danone, ker so z njim nameravali doseči hitro zaustavitev naraščajočih stroškov nabave trgovcev na debelo.
Moreover, the agreement is akin to one whose purpose was to share the on trade-markets between the two groups.
Poleg tega je sporazum soroden s tistim, s katerim so nameravali deliti trge gostinstva med poslovni skupini.
Indeed, by establishing the dual equilibrium mentioned in point 2.3 above, the parties were aiming to ensure that one party did not dominate the other on this market.
Z vzpostavitvijo dvojnega ravnovesja, navedenega v točki II.3 zgoraj, so stranke hotele zagotoviti, da ena stranka ni prevladala nad drugo na tem trgu.
It is settled case-law that, for the purpose of applying Article 81(1), of the Treaty, there is no need to take account of the actual effects of an agreement once it appears that its aim is to prevent, restrict or distort competition within the common market.
Po ustaljeni sodni praksi za namen uporabe odstavka 1 člena 81 Pogodbe ni potrebno upoštevati dejanskih učinkov sporazuma, ko se izkaže, da namerava preprečiti, omejiti ali izkriviti konkurenco na skupnem trgu.
Since the agreement at issue in this case had as its object the restriction of competition by requiring a freeze on acquisitions and by establishing equilibrium between the parties’ integrated distribution networks, the Commission concludes that there is an infringement within the meaning of article 81 of the Treaty even if the agreement did not produce any effects.
Ker je obravnavani sporazum v tem primeru za svoj cilj imel omejitev konkurence z zahtevo po zamrznitvi prevzemov in z vzpostavitvijo ravnovesja med združenima distribucijskima omrežjema strank, Komisija ugotavlja, da obstaja kršitev v smislu člena 81 Pogodbe, tudi če sporazum ni prinesel nobenih učinkov.
Appreciable effect on trade between Member States
Občuten učinek na trgovino med državami članicami
It is settled case-law that, in order that an agreement between undertakings may affect trade between Member States, it must be possible to envisage, with a sufficient degree of probability on the basis of a set of objective factors of law or fact that it may have an influence, direct or indirect, actual or potential, the pattern of trade between Member states.
Po ustaljeni sodni praksi, da bi sporazum med podjetji lahko vplival na trgovanje med državami članicami, mora biti mogoče z zadostno mero verjetnosti predvideti, na podlagi vrste objektivnih zakonskih ali dejanskih dejavnikov, da ima lahko sporazum vpliv, neposreden ali posreden, dejanski ali možen, na strukturo trgovine med državami članicami.
This is the case here.
To velja tudi za ta primer.
The distribution networks of the French breweries constitute one of the main means of access to the market for foreign breweries that do not have such networks in France.
Vsekakor distribucijska omrežja francoskih pivovarn predstavljajo eno izmed glavnih poti dostopa do trga za tuje pivovarne, ki nimajo takšnih omrežij v Franciji.
Under these circumstances, the armistice agreement, which aims at establishing equilibrium at national level between the integrated distribution networks of Heineken NV/Heineken France SA and Groupe Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, could influence the conditions of access to the on-trade market for foreign breweries and thus the volume of importations.
V teh okoliščinah sporazum o „premirju“, ki namerava vzpostaviti ravnovesje na državni ravni med združenimi distribucijskimi omrežji Heineken NV/Heineken France SA in Groupe Danone/Brasseries Kronenbourg SA, lahko vpliva na pogoje dostopa tujih pivovarn do trga gostinstva in zato na obseg uvoza.