natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
outlining the general approach for the reallocation of resources under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 establishing an Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession
o določitvi splošnega pristopa za prerazporeditev sredstev po Uredbi (ES) št. 1267/1999 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta strukturne politike v predpristopnem obdobju
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 of 21 June 1999 establishing an Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession [1], and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1267/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta strukturnih politik v pred-pristopnem obdobju [1] in zlasti drugega pododstavka člena 15 Uredbe,
The Copenhagen European Council of 12 and 13 December 2002 endorsed the results of the negotiations which resulted in the accession to the Community in 2004 of eight countries at the time benefiting from the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999.
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Kopenhagnu 12. in 13. decembra 2002 so bili potrjeni rezultati pogajanj, zaradi katerih se je leta 2004 Skupnosti pridružilo osem držav, ki so takrat bile upravičene po določbah Uredbe (ES) 1267/1999.
Consequently, during the period from 2004 to 2006, only Bulgaria and Romania will continue to benefit from commitments under that Regulation.
Posledično bosta od leta 2004 do 2006 do obveznosti po tej uredbi upravičeni le še Bolgarija in Romunija.
By endorsing the ‘roadmaps’ for Bulgaria and Romania proposed by the Commission, the Copenhagen European Council agreed, by way of a general approach for reallocation, that the ratio for reallocation should be fixed at 30/70, respectively, under the Phare programme set up under Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to the Republic of Hungary and the Polish People’s Republic [2], the special accession programme for agriculture and rural development (Sapard) set up under Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 [3] and the Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession (ISPA), set up under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999.
Po odobritvi „smernic“ za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, ki jo je predlagala Komisija, je Evropski svet v Kopenhagnu soglašal s splošnim pristopom za prerazporeditev sredstev, ki se določi v razmerju 30/70, v okviru programa Phare, ustanovljenega z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89 z dne 18. decembra 1989 o gospodarski pomoči Republiki Madžarski in Republiki Poljski [2], v okviru Posebnega pristopnega programa za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (SAPARD), ustanovljenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 1268/1999 [3], in instrumenta strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA), vzpostavljenega z Uredbo (ES) št. 1267/1999.
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999, the ratio takes account of the need and capacity of Bulgaria and Romania for absorbing assistance, as well as of the criteria laid down in Article 4 of that Regulation.
V skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 1267/1999 se pri razmerju upoštevajo potrebe in možnosti Bolgarije in Romunije za prevzem pomoči, kakor tudi merila določena v členu 4 navedene uredbe.
Since the 30/70 ratio applies to the three-year period 2004 to 2006 as a whole, it is appropriate to permit an indicative allocation of the total resources on an annual basis consistent with that ratio.
Ker velja razmerje 30/70 za celotno triletno obdobje od 2004 do 2006, je primerno dovoliti okvirno dodelitev skupnih sredstev na letni ravni skladno z navedenim razmerjem.
Consequently, the general approach for reallocation between the remaining beneficiary countries, namely Bulgaria and Romania, should be that the 30/70 ratio is to apply to the three-year period from 2004 to 2006 as a whole, and an indicative allocation of the total resources is to be determined on an annual basis in accordance with a bracket reflecting that overall ratio,
Zato naj bi bil splošni pristop za prerazporeditev med ostale države upravičenke, namreč med Bolgarijo in Romunijo, takšen, da se razmerje 30/70 uporabi v celotnem triletnem obdobju od 2004 do 2006, in da se določijo okvirne dodelitve skupnih sredstev na letni ravni v skladu s splošnim razmerjem –
By way of a general approach for the three-year period 2004 to 2006, the resources under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 shall be reallocated between Bulgaria and Romania in accordance with a ratio of 30/70, respectively, applicable to that period as a whole.
S splošnim pristopom za triletno obdobje od 2004 do 2006 se sredstva po Uredbi (ES) št. 1267/1999 prerazporedijo med Bolgarijo in Romunijo v skladu z razmerjem 30/70 ter se uporabljajo v celotnem obdobju.
During the three-year period referred to in the first subparagraph, the annual allocation of resources under Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 shall be determined on the basis of an indicative ratio of 65 % to 75 % of total resources in the case of Romania and 25 % to 35 % of total resources in the case of Bulgaria.
V triletnem obdobju, določenem v prvem pododstavku, se letna razporeditev sredstev iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1267/1999 določi na osnovi okvirnega razmerja od 65 % do 75 % skupnih sredstev za Romunijo in od 25 % do 35 % skupnih sredstev za Bolgarijo.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 769/2004.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 769/2004.
on the opening of the negotiations on an agreement concerning monetary relations with the Principality of Andorra
o začetku pogajanj glede sporazuma o monetarnih odnosih s Kneževino Andoro
Having regard to Council Decision 2004/548/EC of 11 May 2004 on the position to be taken by the Community regarding an agreement concerning the monetary relations with the Principality of Andorra [1], and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta 2004/548/ES z dne 11. maja 2004 o stališču Skupnosti do sporazuma o monetarnih odnosih s Kneževino Andoro [1], in zlasti člena 8 Sklepa,
Having regard to the Recommendation of the Commission [2],
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije [2],
Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank [3],
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske Centralne Banke [3],
The opening of the negotiations on an agreement with the Principality of Andorra (hereinafter, Andorra) on monetary matters should be conditional upon the fulfilment of the necessary conditions.
Začetek pogajanj o sporazumu s Kneževino Andoro (v nadaljevanju „Andora“) o monetarnih zadevah bi moral biti pogojen z izpolnitvijo potrebnih pogojev.
The prior initialling by both parties of the agreement on the taxation of income from savings, as well as the undertaking by Andorra to ratify such agreement before a date agreed with the Community, should form part of those conditions.
Med temi pogoji naj bi bilo predhodno parafiranje obeh strank sporazuma o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov kot tudi obveza Andore, da ratificira ta sporazum pred datumom, dogovorjenim s Skupnostjo.
Andorra and the Commission have proceeded on 1 July 2004 with the initialling of the agreement providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC of 3 June 2003 [4] on the taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments.
Andora in Komisija sta 1. julija 2004 začeli s postopkom parafiranja sporazuma, ki določa merila, enaka merilom iz Direktive Sveta 2003/48/ES z dne 3. junija 2003 o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti [4].
By virtue of the verbal note from the Ambassador of Andorra to the Community of 1 July 2004, Andorra has undertaken to ratify such agreement before 30 April 2005.
Z verbalno noto veleposlanice Andore Komisiji, z dne 1. julija 2004, se je Andora obvezala, da ratificira tak sporazum do 30. aprila 2005.
This date is acceptable to the Community.
Ta datum je za Skupnost sprejemljiv.
The absence of ratification by Andorra, before the agreed date, of the agreement on the taxation of income from savings should result in the suspension of the negotiations on the monetary agreement until such ratification has taken place,
V kolikor Andora pred dogovorjenim datumom ne ratificira sporazuma o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov, bodo pogajanja o monetarnem sporazumu do ratifikacije ustavljena –
The necessary conditions for the opening of the negotiations with the Principality of Andorra on an agreement on monetary matters, as laid down in Article 8 of Decision 2004/548/EC on the position to be taken by the Community regarding an agreement concerning the monetary relations with the Principality of Andorra, have been fulfilled.
Pogoji, potrebni za začetek pogajanj s Kneževino Andoro o sporazumu o monetarnih zadevah, kot je določeno v členu 8 Odločbe 2004/548/ES o stališču Skupnosti do sporazuma o monetarnih odnosih s Kneževino Andoro, so izpolnjeni.
The Commission shall inform the Principality of Andorra of the Community’s readiness to conclude an agreement on monetary matters and it shall propose negotiations for such an agreement.
Komisija obvesti Kneževino Andoro o pripravljenosti Skupnosti, da sklene sporazum o monetarnih zadevah in predlaga pogajanja za tak sporazum.
OJ L 244, 16.7.2004, p. 47.
UL L 244, 16.7.2004, str. 47.
OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 19.
UL C 244, 1.10.2004, str. 19.
OJ C 256, 16.10.2004, p. 9.
UL C 256, 16.10.2004, str. 9.
of 2 November 2004
z dne 2. novembra 2004
establishing the European Union Civil Service Tribunal
o ustanovitvi Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 225a and 245 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 225a in 245 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Articles 140b and 160 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti členov 140b in 160 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Sodišča,
Article 225a of the EC Treaty and Article 140b of the Euratom Treaty empower the Council to create judicial panels to hear and determine at first instance certain classes of action or proceeding brought in specific areas, to lay down the rules on the organisation of the panel and the extent of the jurisdiction conferred upon it.
Člen 225a Pogodbe ES in člen 140b Pogodbe ESAE pooblaščata Svet, da ustanovi sodne oddelke za obravnavanje in odločanje na prvi stopnji o nekaterih vrstah tožb ali postopkov ter določi pravila o organizaciji takšnih sodnih oddelkov in obsegu na njih prenesenih pristojnosti.
The establishment of a specific judicial panel to exercise jurisdiction at first instance in European civil service disputes, currently within the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, would improve the operation of the Community courts system.
Ustanovitev posebnega sodišča za uslužbenske spore, pristojnega za odločanje v teh sporih na prvi stopnji, za katere je sedaj pristojno Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti, naj bi izboljšala delovanje sodnega sistema Skupnosti.
It answers the call made in Declaration No 16 relating to Article 225a of the EC Treaty [1], adopted when the Treaty of Nice was signed on 26 February 2001.
Ustanovitev takega sodišča je v skladu s pozivom iz Izjave št. 16 o členu 225a Pogodbe ES [1], ki je bila sprejeta ob podpisu Pogodbe iz Nice 26. februarja 2001.
A judicial panel should accordingly be attached to the Court of First Instance, that shall for institutional and organisational purposes be an integral part of the Court of Justice institution, an institution with members enjoying a similar status to members of the Court of First Instance.
Sodišču prve stopnje je tako treba dodati sodni oddelek, ki bo v institucionalnem in organizacijskem smislu sestavni del Sodišča in katerega člani bodo imeli enak status kot člani Sodišča prve stopnje.
The new judicial panel should be given a name that distinguishes it in its trial formations from the trial formations of the Court of First Instance.
Novi sodni oddelek je treba poimenovati tako, da se ga bo razlikovalo od lastnih sestav oz. sestav Sodišča prve stopnje.
To make the court system generally easy to understand, the provisions relating to the judicial panel's jurisdiction, composition, organisation and procedure should be laid down in an Annex to the Statute of the Court of Justice.
Da bi zagotovili splošno preglednost sodnega sistema, je treba določbe o pristojnostih, sestavi, organizaciji in postopku sodnega oddelka priložiti k Statutu Sodišča.
The number of judges of the judicial panel should match its caseload.
Število sodnikov sodnega oddelka naj bi ustrezalo pripadu zadev.
To facilitate decision-making by the Council in the appointment of judges, provision should be made for the Council to establish an independent Advisory Committee to verify that applications received meet the relevant conditions.
Da bi Svetu olajšali odločanje o imenovanju sodnikov, naj bi se predvidelo, da Svet ustanovi neodvisni svetovalni odbor, ki bo preverjal, ali predložene kandidature izpolnjujejo zahtevane pogoje.
The judicial panel should try cases by a procedure matching the specific features of the disputes that are to be referred to it, examining the possibilities for amicable settlement of disputes at all stages of the procedure.
Sodni oddelek naj bi odločal po postopku, prilagojenem posebnostim sporov, ki so mu predloženi v odločanje, in naj bi v vseh fazah postopka preučeval možnosti za mirno rešitev spora.
In accordance with the third paragraph of Article 225a of the EC Treaty and the third paragraph of Article 140b of the Euratom Treaty, appeals may be lodged at the Court of First Instance against decisions of the judicial panel on points of law only in the same conditions as those governing appeals lodged at the Court of Justice against decisions of the Court of First Instance.
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 225a Pogodbe ES in tretjim odstavkom člena 140b Pogodbe ESAE se lahko zoper odločbe sodnega oddelka vloži pritožba na Sodišče prve stopnje zgolj glede pravnih vprašanj in pod enakimi pogoji, kot so določeni za pritožbe, ki se sedaj vlagajo na Sodišče zoper odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje.
The relevant provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice are reproduced in the Annex to the Statute relating to the judicial panel, to avoid cross-references that would make the general set of provisions difficult to read.
Ustrezne določbe Statuta Sodišča so v izogib navzkrižnim napotilom, ki bi škodila preglednosti celotne ureditve, priložene k Statutu.
Provision should be made in this Decision for transitional arrangements so that the judicial panel can exercise its functions as soon as it is established,
V tem sklepu naj se predvidijo ustrezne prehodne določbe, da bi lahko sodni oddelek svoje naloge izvajal takoj po ustanovitvi –
A judicial panel shall be attached to the Court of First Instance of the European Communities to hear disputes involving the European Union civil service and shall be known as the ‘European Union Civil Service Tribunal’.
Sodišču prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti se doda sodni oddelek, ki odloča v uslužbenskih sporih Evropske unije, v nadaljnjem besedilu „Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije“.
The European Union Civil Service Tribunal shall have its headquarters at the Court of First Instance.
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije ima sedež pri Sodišču prve stopnje.
The Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice shall be amended as follows:
Protokol o Statutu Sodišča se spremeni:
the following Title shall be inserted:
vstavi se naslednji naslov:
‘TITLE IVa
„NASLOV IVa
JUDICIAL PANELS
SODNI ODDELKI
Article 62a
Člen 62a
The provisions relating to the jurisdiction, composition, organisation and procedure of the judicial panels established under Articles 225a of the EC Treaty and 140b of the EAEC Treaty are set out in an Annex to this Statute.’;
Določbe o pristojnostih, sestavi, organizaciji in postopku sodnih oddelkov, ustanovljenih na podlagi členov 225a Pogodbe ES in 140b Pogodbe ESAE, so priložene k temu statutu.“
Annex I, as set out in the Annex to this Decision, shall be added.
Doda se Priloga I, katere besedilo je vsebovano v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
The first President of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal shall be appointed for three years in the same manner as its judges, unless the Council decides that the procedure laid down in Article 4(1) of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice, as set out in the Annex to this Decision, shall be applied.
Prvi predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije se imenuje za dobo treh let na enak način kot sodniki, vendar pa lahko Svet odloči, da se uporabi postopek iz člena 4(1) Priloge I k Statutu Sodišča, katere besedilo se nahaja v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
Immediately after all the judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal have taken oath, the President of the Council shall choose by lot three judges of the Tribunal whose duties are to end, by way of derogation from the first sentence of the second paragraph of Article 2 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court, upon expiry of the first three years of their term of office.
Takoj ko prisežejo vsi člani Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije, predsednik Sveta nadaljuje z izbiranjem z žrebom treh sodnikov tega sodišča, katerih mandati se z odstopanjem od prvega stavka drugega odstavka člena 2 Priloge I k Statutu Sodišča iztečejo ob koncu prvih treh let mandata.
Cases referred to in Article 1 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice of which the Court of First Instance is seised on the date on which that Article enters into force but in which the written procedure provided for in Article 52 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance has not yet been completed shall be referred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.
Zadeve iz člena 1 Priloge I k Statutu Sodišča, ki so Sodišču prve stopnje predložene do dne začetka veljavnosti omenjenega člena in v katerih pisni postopek iz člena 52 poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje še ni bil zaključen, se odstopijo Sodišču za uslužbence Evropske unije.
Until the entry into force of its rules of procedure, the European Union Civil Service Tribunal shall apply mutatis mutandis the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, except for the provisions concerning a single judge.
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije do začetka veljavnosti svojega poslovnika smiselno uporablja poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje, z izjemo določb o sodniku posamezniku.
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, with the exception of Article 1 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice, as set out in the Annex to this Decision.
Ta sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, z izjemo člena 1 Priloge I k Statutu Sodišča, katere besedilo se nahaja v Prilogi k temu sklepu.
Article 1 of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice shall enter into force on the day of the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the Decision of the President of the Court of Justice recording that the European Union Civil Service Tribunal has been constituted in accordance with law.
Člen 1 Priloge I k Statutu Sodišča začne veljati na dan, ko se v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavi sklep o ugotovitvi predsednika Sodišča, da je Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije ustanovljeno v skladu z zakonom.
OJ C 80, 10.3.2001, p. 80.
UL C 80, 10.3.2001, str. 80.
THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
SODIŠČE ZA USLUŽBENCE EVROPSKE UNIJE
The European Union Civil Service Tribunal (hereafter the Civil Service Tribunal) shall exercise at first instance jurisdiction in disputes between the Communities and their servants referred to in Article 236 of the EC Treaty and Article 152 of the EAEC Treaty, including disputes between all bodies or agencies and their servants in respect of which jurisdiction is conferred on the Court of Justice.
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije, v nadaljnjem besedilu ‚Sodišče za uslužbence’, izvršuje na prvi stopnji pristojnost za odločanje v sporih med Skupnostma in njunimi uslužbenci na podlagi člena 236 Pogodbe ES in člena 152 Pogodbe ESAE, vključno s spori med organi, uradi ali agencijami in njihovim osebjem, za katere je pristojnost dodeljena Sodišču.
The Civil Service Tribunal shall consist of seven judges.
Sodišče za uslužbence sestavlja sedem sodnikov.
Should the Court of Justice so request, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may increase the number of judges.
Svet lahko na zahtevo Sodišča s kvalificirano večino število sodnikov poveča.
The judges shall be appointed for a period of six years.
Sodniki so imenovani za dobo šest let.
Any vacancy shall be filled by the appointment of a new judge for a period of six years.
Prosto mesto se zapolni z imenovanjem novega sodnika za dobo šest let.
The judges shall be appointed by the Council, acting in accordance with the fourth paragraph of Article 225a of the EC Treaty and the fourth paragraph of Article 140b of the EAEC Treaty, after consulting the committee provided for by this Article.
Sodnike imenuje Svet, ki po posvetovanju z odborom, predvidenim v tem členu, odloča v skladu s četrtim odstavkom člena 225a Pogodbe ES in četrtim odstavkom člena 140b Pogodbe ESAE.
When appointing judges, the Council shall ensure a balanced composition of the Tribunal on as broad a geographical basis as possible from among nationals of the Member States and with respect to the national legal systems represented.
Svet pri imenovanju sodnikov zagotovi uravnoteženo sestavo Sodišča za uslužbence, tako da se med državljani držav članic izberejo sodniki iz kar najširšega možnega geografskega območja in se upoštevajo zastopani nacionalni pravni sistemi.
Any person who is a Union citizen and fulfils the conditions laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 225a of the EC Treaty and the fourth paragraph of Article 140b of the EAEC Treaty may submit an application.
Kandidira lahko vsakdo, ki ima državljanstvo Unije in izpolnjuje pogoje iz četrtega odstavka člena 225a Pogodbe ES in četrtega odstavka člena 140b Pogodbe ESAE.
The Council, acting by a qualified majority on a recommendation from the Court, shall determine the conditions and the arrangements governing the submission and processing of such applications.
Svet, ki odloča s kvalificirano večino na priporočilo Sodišča, določi pogoje in podrobnosti za predložitev in obravnavo kandidatur.
A committee shall be set up comprising seven persons chosen from among former members of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance and lawyers of recognised competence.
Ustanovi se odbor, ki ga sestavlja sedem osebnosti, izbranih med nekdanjimi člani Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje ter priznanimi pravniki.
The committee's membership and operating rules shall be determined by the Council, acting by a qualified majority on a recommendation by the President of the Court of Justice.
O imenovanju članov odbora in pravilih za njegovo delovanje odloči Svet s kvalificirano večino na priporočilo predsednika Sodišča.
The committee shall give an opinion on candidates' suitability to perform the duties of judge at the Civil Service Tribunal.
Odbor poda mnenje o ustreznosti kandidatov za izvrševanje sodniške funkcije v okviru Sodišča za uslužbence.
The committee shall append to its opinion a list of candidates having the most suitable high-level experience.
Odbor temu mnenju priloži seznam kandidatov z najustreznejšimi izkušnjami na visoki ravni.
Such list shall contain the names of at least twice as many candidates as there are judges to be appointed by the Council.
Seznam mora vsebovati vsaj dvakrat več kandidatov, kot znaša število sodnikov, ki jih mora Svet imenovati.
The judges shall elect the President of the Civil Service Tribunal from among their number for a term of three years.
Sodniki med svojimi člani imenujejo predsednika Sodišča za uslužbence za dobo treh let.
He may be re-elected.
Lahko je ponovno imenovan.
The Civil Service Tribunal shall sit in chambers of three judges.
Sodišče za uslužbence zaseda v senatih treh sodnikov.