natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under Directive 2003/85/EC, the Commission is to ensure that Community reserves of concentrated inactivated antigens for the production of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines are maintained on the premises of the Community antigen and vaccine bank.
V skladu z Direktivo 2003/85/ES mora Komisija zagotoviti, da so v prostorih banke Skupnosti za antigen in cepivo stalno na zalogi koncentrirani neaktivirani antigeni za proizvodnjo cepiv proti slinavki in parkljevki.
For that purpose the number of doses and the diversity of strains and subtypes of antigens of foot-and-mouth disease viruses stored in the Community antigen and vaccine bank is to be decided taking into account the needs as estimated in the context of the contingency plans and the epidemiological situation, where appropriate after consultation with the Community Reference Laboratory.
Določiti je treba število odmerkov in različnost sevov ter podtipov antigenov virusa slinavke in parkljevke, ki se skladiščijo v banki antigenov in cepiv Skupnosti, ob upoštevanju potreb, ocenjenih v sklopu načrtov ukrepov ob nepredvidljivih dogodkih in epidemioloških razmer po posvetovanju z referenčnim laboratorijem Skupnosti, kjer je to potrebno.
Pending the designation of a Community Reference Laboratory for foot-and-mouth disease, account is taken of the report of the FAO World Reference Laboratory for Foot-and-Mouth Disease on a list of priority antigens recommended for antigen banks, which was endorsed by the Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EUFMD) at the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) at the 36th General Session of EUFMD.
Do imenovanja referenčnega laboratorija Skupnosti za bolezni slinavke in parkljevke se upošteva poročilo Svetovnega referenčnega laboratorija za bolezni slinavke in parkljevke FAO o seznamu prednostnih antigenov, ki se priporočajo za banke antigenov in ga je potrdil Tehnični odbor Evropske komisije za nadzor slinavke in parkljevke (EUFMD) pri Organizaciji za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO) na 36. plenarnem zasedanju EUFMD.
The deterioration of the foot-and-mouth disease situation in certain parts of the world requires certain stocks of antigens to be supplemented urgently in accordance with the risks associated with this development for the epidemiological situation in the Community and neighbouring countries.
Zaradi poslabšanja razmer glede slinavke in parkljevke v nekaterih delih sveta je treba določene zaloge antigenov takoj povečati v skladu s tveganji, povezanimi z razvojem epidemioloških razmer v Skupnosti in sosednjih državah.
When deciding about the procurement of additional quantities and subtypes of foot-and-mouth disease virus antigens account should be taken of existing quantities of such antigens, of the compatibility required for combination in polyvalent vaccines and of the marketing authorisation held by the manufacturer of the antigens in at least one of the Member States in accordance with Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products [4].
Pri odločanju o naročilih dodatnih količin in podtipov antigenov virusa slinavke in parkljevke je treba upoštevati obstoječe količine takih antigenov, skladnost, ki se zahteva pri kombiniranju v polivalentnih cepivih, dovoljenje za promet s strani proizvajalca antigenov v vsaj eni od držav članic v skladu z Direktivo 2001/82/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v veterinarski medicini [4].
Because the information on quantities and subtypes of antigens or authorised vaccines stored in the Community antigen and vaccine bank is to be treated as classified information in accordance with Directive 2003/85/EC, the Annex to this Decision should not be published.
Ker so informacije o količinah in podtipih antigenov ali odobrenih cepiv, ki se hranijo pri banki antigenov in cepiv Skupnosti, zaupni podatki v skladu z Direktivo 2003/85/ES, se Priloga k temu sklepu ne objavi.
In accordance with Article 14 of Decision 90/424/EEC, the level of Community participation to set up such antigen reserves and the conditions to which such participation may be subject should also be set out.
V skladu s členom 14 Odločbe 90/424/EGS se določi višina udeležbe Skupnosti pri stroških za oblikovanje takih rezerv antigenov in prav tako pogoji, pod katerimi se taka pomoč odobri.
The Commission shall purchase foot-and-mouth disease virus antigens in the quantities and subtypes specified in the Annex.
Komisija kupi antigene virusa slinavke in parkljevke v količinah in podtipih iz Priloge.
The Commission shall ensure that the antigens are distributed for storage between the two designated sites of the premises of the manufacturer in accordance with the Annex.
Komisija zagotovi distribucijo antigenov tako, da je zaloga v obeh imenovanih krajih v prostorih proizvajalca razporejena v skladu s Prilogo.
The measures mentioned in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be carried out by the Commission in cooperation with the supplier of the relevant antigens already stored in the European antigen bank.
Ukrepe iz odstavkov 1 in 2 izvede Komisija v sodelovanju z dobaviteljem ustreznih antigenov, ki se skladiščijo v evropski banki antigenov.
The measures provided for in Article 1 shall be completed by 31 December 2005 at the latest.
Ukrepi iz člena 1 se uvedejo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2005.
The Commission shall bear the full cost of the measures referred to in Article 1(1) and (2) which shall not exceed a maximum set up to EUR 2500000.
Komisija krije celotne stroške za ukrepe iz člena 1(1) in (2), ki ne presegajo 2500000 EUR.
The Commission shall conclude a contract on the purchases provided for in paragraph 1 in accordance with Article 80(4) of Directive 2003/85/EC.
Komisija sklene prodajno pogodbo iz odstavka 1 v skladu s členom 80(4) Direktive 2003/85/ES.
The Commission shall ensure that the antigens referred to in Article 1(1) are included in the scope of existing contracts concerning the storage of antigens as well as the formulation, production, bottling, labelling and delivery of vaccines reconstituted from such antigens.
Komisija zagotovi, da so antigeni iz člena 1(1) vključeni v področje uporabe obstoječih pogodb v zvezi s skladiščenjem antigenov, kakor tudi oblikovanjem, proizvodnjo, stekleničenjem, označevanjem in dostavo cepiv, pridobljenih iz takih antigenov.
The Director-General of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection is hereby authorised to sign the contract provided for in paragraph 2 on behalf of the Commission.
Generalni direktor Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov se s tem sklepom Komisije pooblasti za podpis pogodbe, predvidene v odstavku 2.
In accordance with Article 80(3) of Directive 2003/85/EC the Annex to this Decision shall not be published.
V skladu s členom 80(3) Direktive 2003/85/ES se Priloga k temu sklepu ne objavi.
Directive as amended by Commission Decision 2005/615/EC (OJ L 213, 18.8.2005, p. 14).
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 2005/615/ES (UL L 213, 18.8.2005, str. 14).
OJ L 368, 31.12.1991, p. 21.
UL L 368, 31.12.1991, str. 21.
Decision as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 36).
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 807/2003 (UL L 122, 16.5.2003, str. 36).
concerning a State aid which Germany is planning to implement for the development of municipal infrastructure directly serving industry in accordance with Part II, point 7 of the Outline Plan for the joint Federal Government/Länder scheme for ‘Improving regional economic structures’ — Construction or extension of business, technology and incubator centres that provide accommodation and services for small and medium-sized enterprises 2004 to 2006
o državni pomoči, ki jo Nemčija namenja razvoju občinske gospodarske infrastrukture v skladu s točko 7 dela II Okvirnega načrta skupne naloge zvezne vlade in dežel „Izboljšanje regionalnih gospodarskih struktur“ – Izgradnja ali razširitev poslovnih, tehnoloških in ustanovnih centrov, ki malim in srednjim podjetjem nudijo prostore in storitve 2004–2006
(notified under document number C(2005) 1315)
(notificirana pod dokumentarno številko K(2005) 1315)
Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o evropskem gospodarskem prostoru in zlasti člena 62(1)(a) Sporazuma,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty [1], and in particular Article 7 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES [1], in zlasti člena 7,
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [2] and having regard to their comments,
po pozivu zainteresiranim strankam, naj predložijo svoje pripombe v skladu z navedenimi členi [2], in ob upoštevanju teh pripomb,
By letter of 19 September 2002, registered as received by the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 20 September 2002, Germany notified to the Commission the aforementioned aid scheme pursuant to Article 88(3) of the EC Treaty.
S pismom z dne 19. septembra 2002, ki ga je 20. septembra evidentiral Generalni sekretariat Komisije, je Nemčija Komisiji priglasila navedeni program pomoči v skladu s členom 88(3) Pogodbe ES.
Although Germany did not regard the measure as State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty, the measure was notified for reasons of legal certainty.
Nemčija ukrepa ni obravnavala kot državno pomoč v smislu člena 87(1) Pogodbe ES, vendar ga je priglasila zaradi pravne varnosti.
The case was registered as State aid No N 644/g/2002.
Postopek je bil registriran kot državna pomoč št. N 644/g/2002.
By letters of 9 October 2002, 17 January 2003, 30 June 2003 and 25 September 2003, the Commission requested additional information.
Komisija je s pismi z dne 9. oktobra 2002, 17. januarja 2003, 30. junija 2003 in 25. septembra 2003 zaprosila za dodatne informacije.
Germany replied by letters of 18 November 2002, 11 and 12 February 2003, 24 July 2003 and 30 October 2003.
Nemčija je te informacije predložila s pismi z dne 18. novembra 2002, 11. in 12. februarja 2003, 24. julija 2003 in 30. oktobra 2003.
By letter of 26 November 2003, Germany agreed with a request for the extension until 5 February 2004 of the two-month time-limit pursuant to Article 4(5) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 and submitted additional information.
S pismom z dne 26. novembra 2003 se je Nemčija strinjala s podaljšanjem dvomesečnega roka do 5. februarja 2004 v skladu s členom 4(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 659/1999 in predložila dodatne informacije.
By letter dated 18 February 2004, the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) of the EC Treaty.
Komisija je s pismom z dne 18. februarja Nemčijo obvestila o sprožitvi postopka v skladu s členom 88(2) Pogodbe ES.
The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union [3].
Sklep Komisije o sprožitvi postopka je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu Evropske unije [3].
The Commission called on interested parties to submit their comments.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane stranke, naj predložijo svoje pripombe o zadevnem ukrepu.
It forwarded them to Germany by letter of 15 November 2004, giving it the opportunity to react.
Posredovala jih je Nemčiji in ji dala priložnost s pismom z dne 15. novembra 2004, da izrazi svoje mnenje.
However, Germany did not react to those comments.
Vendar Nemčija k tem pripombam ni zavzela stališča.
Comments by Germany were received on 19 March 2004.
Komisija je pripombe Nemčije prejela 19. marca 2004.
A meeting was held on 22 April 2004, following which Germany, after two reminders from the Commission dated 9 July and 9 September 2004, sent additional information by letter of 16 September 2004, registered as received on 22 September.
aprila 2004 je bilo srečanje, po katerem je Nemčija po dveh pozivih Komisije z dne 9. julija 2004 in 9. septembra 2004 predložila dodatne informacije s pismom z dne 16. septembra, evidentiranim 22. septembra 2004.
A further meeting was held on 16 December 2004, following which the German authorities, after a reminder from the Commission dated 14 February 2005, presented additional information and amended the measure by letters of 3 and 23 March 2005, registered as received the same day.
Naslednje srečanje je bilo 16. decembra 2004, po katerem je Nemčija po pozivu Komisije z dne 14. februarja 2005 predložila dodatne informacije in popravila ukrep s pismoma z dne 3. in 23. marca 2005, evidentiranima istega dne.
The measure is financed jointly by the Federal Government and the Länder.
Ukrep financirajo skupaj zvezna vlada in zvezne dežele.
It is administered by the Land governments, with the result that certain details of the measure are treated in a slightly different manner by the individual Länder.
Upravljajo ga deželne vlade, zato se z določenimi podrobnostmi ukrepa v posameznih deželah ravna nekoliko drugače.
The public support is made available in the form of grants for the providers of the centres.
Državna pomoč se dodeljuje v obliki subvencij za ustanovitelje centrov.
It is equivalent to not more than 90 % of the construction or extension costs of the centres.
Znaša največ 90 % stroškov za izgradnjo ali razširitev centrov.
The financial support granted under the scheme is intended to benefit the providers.
Finančna pomoč, dodeljena v okviru ukrepa, naj bi pomagala uporabnikom centrov.
This is not to be understood as meaning that the providers or the users would benefit from an aid intensity of up to 90 % of eligible costs.
Tega ni razumeti tako, da ustanovitelji ali uporabniki centrov prejmejo pomoč v višini 90 % upravičenih stroškov.
The measure applies both to Article 87(3)(a) and (c) areas and to non-assisted areas (accounting for about 5 % of the area covered by the measure).
Ukrep velja tako za območja po členu 87(3)(a) in (c) Pogodbe ES kakor tudi za območja ki niso upravičena do pomoči (približno 5 % območij, ki jih pokriva ukrep).
The measure runs until 31 December 2006 and has an annual budget of some EUR 120 million.
Ukrep velja do 31. decembra 2006, predvidena sredstva znašajo približno 120 milijonov EUR letno.
The measure is designed to provide certain facilities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Ukrep je namenjen temu, da bi malim in srednjim podjetjem (MSP) ponudili določene ugodnosti.
First, SMEs will be able to rent premises in a centre.
MSP je v prvi vrsti pomembna možnost, da bi v centru lahko najeli prostore.
Moreover, SMEs in such centres will be able to avail themselves of services such as consultancy, accommodation searches and cooperation with, for example, universities and research institutes or networking with other enterprises.
Poleg tega bi lahko MSP v teh centrih koristila storitve, kot so svetovanje, raziskovalna oprema in možnost sodelovanja, na primer z univerzami in raziskovalnimi instituti, ali povezovanja z drugimi podjetji.
However, SMEs will not be supported directly but within a more complex structure.
Vendar MSP ne bodo podprta neposredno, temveč v okviru bolj zapletene strukture.
Germany will make financial resources available to the ‘providers’ in order to encourage them to construct and/or extend a building, i.e. an ‘industrial centre, a technology centre or an incubator centre’, so that facilities can be rented out and services provided to the users (SMEs).
Nemčija bo odgovornim, „ustanoviteljem“, dala na razpolago finančna sredstva, da bi jih spodbudila k izgradnji ali razširitvi poslopij, tj. „poslovnega, tehnološkega ali ustanovnega centra“, tako da bi bilo mogoče uporabnikom (MSP) v centru ponuditi prostore in storitve.
The centres must be operated for at least 15 years.
Ustanovitelji morajo zagotoviti vsaj 15-letno delovanje centra.
The providers are normally municipalities or local authority associations but can also be public or private non-profit bodies.
Ustanovitelji centrov so ponavadi občine ali občinske zveze, lahko pa tudi javna ali zasebna neprofitna združenja.
The centres are usually owner-operated or separate non-profit legal entities.
Na splošno so centri bodisi neprofitna občinska samostojna podjetja bodisi ločene neprofitne pravne osebe.
There are different types of centre. Whereas business centres usually provide premises for all kinds of SMEs in a particular sector or in all sectors, technology centres are geared to small enterprises undertaking research; all the necessary facilities are available, e.g. laboratories, consultancy services and contacts with universities and research institutes.
Vrst centrov je več: medtem ko poslovni centri ponavadi nudijo prostore vsem vrstam MSP določenega sektorja ali vsem sektorjem, so tehnološki centri namenjeni malim podjetjem, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskovalno dejavnostjo; nudijo jim potrebno opremo, na primer laboratorije, svetovanja, stike z univerzami in raziskovalnimi instituti.
Incubator centres are intended for start-ups, mainly by micro enterprises.
Ciljna skupina ustanovnih centrov so novoustanovljena podjetja, predvsem mikro podjetja.
However, there are also hybrid centres.
Vsekakor pa so možne tudi mešane oblike centrov.
Especially where not all the premises available can be rented out to the target group, centres tend to attract other target groups.
Predvsem kadar določena ciljna skupina ne najame vseh prostorov, centri ponavadi poskušajo pritegniti druge ciljne skupine.
Thus, for instance, a technology centre could be used partly as a business centre.
Tako bi bil lahko na primer tehnološki center delno izkoriščen kot poslovni center.
SMEs using the services of the centres (the users) have to pay rental for the premises occupied by them and top-ups for the use of other facilities (such as laboratories or specialised equipment) and/or consultancy services, if available.
MSP, ki koristijo storitve centrov (v nadaljevanju: uporabniki), morajo za najete prostore plačevati najemnino in doplačila za uporabo druge opreme (kot so laboratoriji ali posebna oprema) in/ali svetovanja, če so na razpolago.
The rental and/or the price for other facilities/services can be below the market price.
Najemnina in/ali cena za drugo opremo/storitve je lahko nižja od tržne cene.
The tenants can use the centres normally for five years (eight years in exceptional cases).
Najemniki lahko centre običajno koristijo pet let (v izjemnih primerih osem let).
The following diagram illustrates how the measure works:
Naslednji grafikon ponazarja, kako ukrep deluje:
Federal government/land
Zvezna vlada/dežela
Provider of the centre
Ustanovitelj centra
Municipalities authority associations counties
Občine in občinske zveze
Provision of premises, research facilities, consultancy services by the centres
Centri zagotavljajo prostore, raziskovalno opremo in svetovanje
Users
Uporabniki
Non-profit-making establishments
Neprofitni organi
REASONS FOR INITIATING THE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE
RAZLOGI ZA SPROŽITEV PREISKOVALNEGA POSTOPKA
In its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the measure was compatible with the common market as Germany had not provided sufficient information on several aspects, in particular whether State aid was involved at all levels of the measure and especially whether the providers of the centres and the SMEs using the services available at the centres benefited or whether the aid was passed on in its entirety to the SMEs.
V sklepu za sprožitev uradnega preiskovalnega postopka je Komisija podvomila v združljivost ukrepa s skupnim trgom, saj Nemčija ni predložila zadostnih informacij glede več različnih vidikov. To zadeva predvsem vprašanje, ali pomoči obsegajo vse ravni ukrepa, predvsem, če so ustanovitelji centrov in MSP, ki koristijo storitve centra, deležni ugodnosti, ali pa je celotna pomoč v korist MSP.
COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES
PRIPOMBE ZAINTERESIRANIH TRETJIH STRANK
The ADT claimed that the services provided by the centres were not available on the market.
ADT je razložila, da storitve, ki jih nudijo centri, na trgu niso na razpolago.
According to it, the services offered by the centres included consultancy services (formulation of business plans, support in obtaining start-up capital, etc.), short-term leases, cooperation and clustering with regional research establishments, universities or other enterprises, and research facilities within the centres (laboratories, specialised equipment, etc.).
K ponujenim storitvam po navedbah ADT štejejo svetovanja (izdelava načrtov podjetja, podpora pri pridobivanju začetnega kapitala itd.), kratkoročne najemniške pogodbe, sodelovanje in povezovanja z regionalnimi raziskovalnimi institucijami, univerzami ali z drugimi podjetji, kakor tudi raziskovalna oprema (laboratoriji, posebna oprema itd.).
In addition, the ADT pointed out that approximately 90 % of start-ups in the centres survive for three years, a much better figure than that for start-ups elsewhere.
Nadalje zveza opozarja, da v centrih preživi približno 90 % novoustanovljenih podjetij, kar je v primerjavi z drugimi novoustanovljenimi podjetji zelo veliko.
V. COMMENTS FROM GERMANY
V. PRIPOMBE NEMŠKIH ORGANOV
In its original comments, Germany argued that the measure was aimed at rectifying market failure in the real estate sector, which was unable to provide start-ups in particular with facilities at prices they could afford.
V svojih prvih pripombah je Nemčija pojasnila, da naj bi ukrep služil izravnavi pomanjkljivosti trga na področju nepremičnin, ki predvsem novoustanovljenim podjetjem ne more ponuditi prostorov po zanje sprejemljivi ceni.
In Germany’s experience, the private market is reluctant to provide innovative start-ups with facilities as these firms are normally high-risk ventures.
Po izkušnjah Nemčije zasebni trg omahuje, ali naj inovativnim novoustanovljenim podjetjem ponudi prostore, saj ta podjetja ponavadi spadajo v rizično skupino.
In addition, small scale facilities are not apparently available on the market.
Poleg tega na trgu očitno ni na razpolago majhnih prostorov.
Germany also claimed that all the aid would benefit the users of the centres.
Nemčija je tudi pojasnila, da je bila celotna podpora v korist uporabnikom centrov.
As regards the aid element for the users, it first stated that the aid intensity for the users would not exceed 10 % to 20 % of the comparable market prices.
Z ozirom na element pomoči, namenjen uporabnikom, je Nemčija sprva pojasnila, da naj intenzivnost pomoči na ravni uporabnikov ne bi presegala 10–20 % primerljivih tržnih cen.
However, in its letter of 22 September 2004, it commented that market prices normally would be paid by the users (prices at the lower-end of the market price scale) and that, in any case, the aid granted would be below EUR 100000 over a period of three years (up to EUR 23000 per user each year over a five-year period).
Toda v pismu z dne 22. septembra 2004 je navedla, da naj bi uporabniki ponavadi plačevali tržne cene (cene na spodnjem koncu tržne cenovne lestvice) in da znesek pomoči v vsakem primeru v obdobju treh let znaša manj kot 100000 EUR (do 23000 EUR letno na uporabnika v obdobju petih let).
Germany enclosed comments from each Land some of which referred to studies describing the positive effects for users and the positive regional effects of the centres.
Nemčija je posredovala pripombe vseh dežel, ki so se deloma nanašale na študije, ki opisujejo pozitivne posledice za uporabnike in pozitivne regionalne posledice centrov.
Until then, Germany had not undertaken to comply with all the conditions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to de minimis aid [4], and in particular Article 3 on cumulation and monitoring.
Do takrat se Nemčija ni obvezala upoštevati vseh pogojev Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES o pomočeh de minimis [4] in zlasti člena 3, ki zadeva kopičenje in nadzor.