natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 29 November 2003 the applicant applied for Slovenian citizenship under section 19 of the Citizenship Act as amended in 2002.
novembra 2003 je pritožnik na podlagi prehodne določbe 19. člena v letu 2002 sprejetega Zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o državljanstvu zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo.
On 9 February 2004 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Nova Gorica Unit of the Administrative Court, alleging inaction on the part of the administrative authorities (tožba zaradi molka upravnega organa), which had failed to issue a supplementary ex tunc decision.
februarja 2004 je pritožnik vložil tožbo zaradi molka upravnega organa pri Upravnem sodišču, Oddelek v Novi Gorici, saj mu ni bila izdana dopolnilna odločba za nazaj.
On 20 May 2005 the applicant&apos;s complaint was rejected by the Administrative Court.
maja 2005 je upravno sodišče pritožnikovo tožbo zavrglo.
On 14 November 2005 the Ministry dismissed his application for Slovenian citizenship because he had failed to prove that he had actually resided in Slovenia for ten years and had lived there uninterruptedly for the last five years.
novembra 2005 je ministrstvo zavrnilo pritožnikovo prošnjo za slovensko državljanstvo, saj mu ni uspelo dokazati, da v Sloveniji dejansko živi deset let in da je tu neprekinjeno živel zadnjih pet let.
At the same time, the applicant also applied to the Italian Ministry of the Interior to obtain the status of a stateless person.
Hkrati je pritožnik na italijanskem ministrstvu za notranje zadeve zaprosil za status osebe brez državljanstva.
In recent years the applicant has been repeatedly stopped and detained by the Italian police.
V zadnjih letih je italijanska policija pritožnika večkrat ustavila in pridržala.
Moreover, on 20 April 2006 he was ordered to leave the country within five days.
Poleg tega so mu 20. aprila 2006 odredili, naj v petih dneh zapusti državo.
Eventually, he was given leave to remain in Italy since he had applied for recognition of his stateless person status and the proceedings were pending.
Pozneje so mu dovolili ostati v Italiji, saj je zaprosil za priznanje statusa osebe brez državljanstva, postopek pa je še tekel.
The applicant was also charged with illegal immigration into Italian territory.
Pritožnika so obtožili tudi nezakonite priselitve na italijansko ozemlje.
On 19.June 2006 the Mantua District Court acquitted him, on the ground that he had no citizenship and could not be expected to leave Italy voluntarily.
junija 2006 ga je okrožno sodišče v Mantovi oprostilo, ker ni imel državljanstva in ker ni bilo pričakovati, da bo prostovoljno odšel iz Italije.
At the time his application for stateless person status was pending.
Takrat je bila njegova prošnja za status osebe brez državljanstva v postopku reševanja.
His application was eventually dismissed on the ground that an alien who was unlawfully residing in Italian territory was not entitled to the status in question.
Prošnjo so nazadnje zavrnili iz razloga, da tujec, ki nezakonito prebiva na italijanskem ozemlju, ni upravičen do tega statusa.
The applicant stated that he had been living in extremely difficult conditions.
Pritožnik je navedel, da živi v izredno težkih razmerah.
He has not brought any proceedings under the amended Legal Status Act.
Po spremenjenem in dopolnjenem ZUSDDD ni sprožil nobenih postopkov.
Ms was born on 4 June 1965 in Èakovec (Croatia).
se je rodila 4. junija 1965 v Čakovcu (Hrvaška).
She is a Croatian citizen.
Je hrvaška državljanka.
In 1979 she moved to Ljubljana (Slovenia), where she later found work.
Leta 1979 se je preselila v Ljubljano (Slovenija) in si našla zaposlitev.
She completed eight years of elementary school and was registered as a permanent resident in Slovenia from 28 July 1980 to 26.February 1992.
Končala je osem razredov osnovne šole, stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji pa je imela prijavljeno od 28. julija 1980 do 26. februarja 1992.
According to the applicant, in 1992, after the birth of her second child, she became aware of the fact that her name had been &quot;erased&quot; from the Register.
Po navedbah pritožnice je po rojstvu drugega otroka leta 1992 spoznala, da je bilo njeno ime izbrisano iz registra.
Her employer had shortened her maternity leave and made her redundant.
Delodajalec ji je skrajšal dopust za nego in varstvo otroka in jo opredelil kot presežek.
Moreover, in March 1993 she was stopped by the police during a routine check.
Marca 1993 jo je ob rutinski kontroli ustavila policija.
Since she had no identity documents, she was detained at the police station and later in a transit centre for foreigners (prehodni dom za tujce), but was released after paying a fine.
Ker ni imela osebnih dokumentov, so jo pridržali na policijski postaji in nato v prehodnem domu za tujce, vendar pa so jo po plačilu denarne kazni izpustili.
The applicant considered that this arrest amounted to confirmation of the loss of her legal status.
Pritožnica meni, da se je ob tem pridržanju pokazalo, da je izgubila pravni status.
Subsequently, she moved to Piran, where she met H.Š., a Slovenian citizen, with whom she had two children, both of whom are Slovenian citizens.
Pozneje se je preselila v Piran, kjer je spoznala H. Š., slovenskega državljana, s katerim ima dva otroka, ki sta oba slovenska državljana.
She stated that she had not started any proceedings in order to regularise her status since she clearly did not fulfil the conditions under the existing legislation.
Navedla je, da za urejanje statusa ni sprožila nobenega postopka, saj nikakor ni izpolnjevala pogojev po veljavni zakonodaji.
After the entry into force of the Legal Status Act, on 13 December 1999 Ms submitted an application for a permanent residence permit.
Po začetku veljavnosti ZUSDDD, 13. decembra 1999, je zaprosila za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje.
The Ministry asked her five times to complete her application and informed her that she could also have sought a permanent residence permit under the provisions for family reunion.
Ministrstvo jo je petkrat opozorilo, naj dopolni prošnjo, in jo obvestilo, da bi lahko zaprosila za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje tudi zaradi združitve družine.
On 14 April 2004 the applicant requested the Ministry to issue a supplementary decision under point no. 8 of the operative part of the Constitutional Court&apos;s decision of 3 April 2003 (see paragraph 60 above).
aprila 2004 je pritožnica od ministrstva zahtevala, naj ji izda dopolnilno odločbo po 8. točki izreka odločbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. aprila 2003 (glej 60. odstavek).
On 29 April 2004 the applicant applied for Slovenian citizenship under section 19 of the amended Citizenship Act.
aprila 2004 je pritožnica na podlagi prehodne določbe 19. člena v letu 2002 sprejetega Zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o državljanstvu zaprosila za slovensko državljanstvo.
On 15 October 2004 she attended a meeting at the Piran Administrative Unit in the context of proceedings for a permanent residence permit.
oktobra 2004 se je udeležila sestanka na Upravni enoti Piran zaradi postopka za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje.
On 25 October 2004 she was requested to complete her application.
oktobra 2004 so jo prosili, naj prošnjo dopolni.
On 5 November 2004 the Institute of Pension and Invalidity Insurance stated that the applicant&apos;s employment in Slovenia was registered in their files.
novembra 2004 je Zavod za pokojninsko in invalidsko zavarovanje potrdil, da ima v evidenci zavedeno pritožničino zaposlitev v Sloveniji.
On 6 December 2004 the Ministry terminated the proceedings relating to the applicant&apos;s request for a permanent residence permit on account of her inactivity and her inability to prove that she had been actually resident in Slovenia since 23 December 1990 onwards.
decembra 2004 je ministrstvo ustavilo postopek v zvezi s pritožničino prošnjo za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje zaradi njene nedejavnosti in nezmožnosti dokazovanja, da od 23. decembra 1990 dejansko živi v Sloveniji.
In the proceedings concerning citizenship, on 18.November 2005 the Ministry gave the applicant two months to complete her application.
V postopku za pridobitev državljanstva je 18. novembra 2005 ministrstvo pritožnici postavilo rok dva meseca za dopolnitev prošnje.
Among other things, she had to prove that she had been actually resident in Slovenia since 23 December 1990.
Med drugim bi bila morala dokazati, da od 23. decembra 1990 dejansko živi v Sloveniji.
On 13 June 2006 the Ministry dismissed her application for Slovenian citizenship.
junija 2006 je ministrstvo zavrnilo prošnjo za pridobitev slovenskega državljanstva.
On 10 August 2007 the applicant applied for a temporary permit as a family member of a Slovenian citizen.
avgusta 2007 je pritožnica zaprosila za izdajo dovoljenja za začasno prebivanje kot družinski član slovenskega državljana.
On 13 September 2007 she received a temporary residence permit valid until 13 September 2012.
septembra 2007 je bilo pritožnici izdano dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje z veljavnostjo do 13. septembra 2012.
On 22 July 2010 the applicant applied for a permanent residence permit under the amended Legal Status Act.
julija 2010 je pritožnica zaprosila za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje po spremenjenem in dopolnjenem ZUSDDD.
On 1 March 2011 she was granted both ex nunc and ex tunc residence permits.
marca 2011 sta bili pritožnici izdani dovoljenji za prebivanje z veljavnostjo od dneva izdaje (ex nunc) in za nazaj (ex tunc).
They were delivered to her on 2 March 2011.
Dovoljenji sta ji bili izročeni 2. marca 2011.
The applicant stated that even after receiving the permanent residence permit she had experienced difficulties in arranging her health insurance and social financial support.
Pritožnica navaja, da je imela težave pri urejanju zdravstvenega zavarovanja in socialne denarne podpore tudi po prejemu dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje.
She had serious health problems.
Imela je hude zdravstvene težave.
was born on 19 November 1968 in Zavidoviæi (Bosnia and Herzegovina).
se je rodila 19. novembra 1968 v Zavidovićih (Bosna in Hercegovina).
She is currently a Serbian citizen.
Trenutno je srbska državljanka.
She moved to Ljubljana (Slovenia) in 1986 in search of work.
V Ljubljano (Slovenija) se je preselila leta 1986 zaradi iskanja zaposlitve.
She married there and on 20.August 1988 her son, the fifth applicant Mr, was born. Mrs was registered as a permanent resident in Ljubljana from 6.August 1986 to 20 November 1991.
Poročila se je in 20. avgusta 1988 rodila sina, petega pritožnika. je imela stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji prijavljeno od 6. avgusta 1986 do 20. novembra 1991.
Mrs maintained that she believed that she would be granted Slovenian citizenship automatically as a permanent resident.
trdi, da je mislila, da bo kot stalna prebivalka Slovenije samodejno pridobila slovensko državljanstvo.
However, in 1994 both Mrs and her son were deported from Slovenia.
Toda Ljubenka Ristanović in njen sin sta bila leta 1994 izgnana iz Slovenije.
She stated that she learned about the &quot;erasure&quot; at that time.
Navedla je, da je za izbris izvedela takrat.
However, Mrs Ristanoviæ&apos;s husband, who was in possession of a work permit and a temporary residence permit at the material time, remained in Slovenia.
Njen mož, ki je imel takrat delovno dovoljenje in dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje, pa je ostal v Sloveniji.
He later received a permanent residence permit.
Pozneje je dobil dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje.
According to the respondent Government, Mrs moved from her municipality without deregistering her permanent residence and her personal records were transferred from the Register of Permanent Residents into the register of persons who had &quot;emigrated without having deregistered&quot;.
Po navedbah tožene vlade se je odselila iz občine, ne da bi odjavila stalno prebivališče, zaradi česar je bil njen osebni karton iz registra stalnega prebivalstva prenesen v kartoteko &quot;odseljenih, a neodjavljenih oseb&quot;.
The applicant stated that she had lived in Serbia as a refugee and had been without any identity papers for many years.
Pritožnica je navedla, da je živela v Srbiji kot begunka in bila več let brez vseh osebnih dokumentov.
In 2004 she acquired a Serbian identity card and in 2005 a Serbian passport.
Leta 2004 je pridobila srbsko osebno izkaznico in leta 2005 srbski potni list.
She stated that she and her son had not applied for a permanent residence permit or for Slovenian citizenship since for many years they had not fulfilled the condition of actually residing in Slovenia under the existing legislation.
Navedla je, da s sinom nista zaprosila za dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje oziroma za slovensko državljanstvo, ker več let nista izpolnjevala pogoja za dejansko prebivanje v Sloveniji po veljavni zakonodaji.
Mrs has not brought any proceedings under the amended Legal Status Act.
po spremenjenem in dopolnjenem ZUSDDD ni sprožila nobenih postopkov.
She stated that she had serious health problems.
Navedla je, da ima hude zdravstvene težave.
Mr was born on 20 August 1988 in Ljubljana (Slovenia).
se je rodil 20. avgusta 1988 v Ljubljani (Slovenija).
He is the son of the fourth applicant, Mrs. He is a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Je sin četrte pritožnice.
Mr was registered as a permanent resident in Ljubljana from 20 August 1988 until 26 February 1992.
Je državljan Bosne in Hercegovine. je imel stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji prijavljeno od 20. avgusta 1988 do 26. februarja 1992.
In 1994 Mr, who was a minor at the time, was deported from Slovenia with his mother.
Leta 1994 je bil, takrat mladoletnik, skupaj z materjo izgnan iz Slovenije.
He lived in Serbia with his mother as a refugee for many years.
Z materjo sta več let živela v Srbiji kot begunca.
In 2004 the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina issued an identity card and a passport to Mr. Since he had no Serbian documents, he had allegedly been living in Serbia in constant fear of being deported.
Leta 2004 so organi Bosne in Hercegovine izdali osebno izkaznico in potni list. Ker ni imel srbskih dokumentov, je po lastnih navedbah v Srbiji živel v stalnem strahu pred izgonom iz države.
On 9 November 2010 he applied for a permanent residence permit under the amended Legal Status Act.
novembra 2010 je zaprosil za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje po spremenjenem in dopolnjenem ZUSDDD.
On 10 March 2011 he was granted both ex nunc and ex tunc residence permits.
marca 2011 sta bili pritožniku podeljeni dovoljenji za prebivanje z veljavnostjo od dneva izdaje (ex nunc) in za nazaj (ex tunc).
They were delivered to him on 11.March 2011 and the applicant returned to Slovenia.
marca 2011 sta mu bili dostavljeni in pritožnik se je vrnil v Slovenijo.
According to the Government, the applicant lodged a petition with the Constitutional Court for constitutional review of the amended Legal Status Act.
Po navedbah vlade je pritožnik na ustavno sodišče vložil pobudo za presojo ustavnosti spremenjenega in dopolnjenega ZUSDDD.
The petition was joined to those lodged by the association Civil Initiative of the &quot;Erased&quot; and by other private individuals.
Pobuda je bila združena s pobudami, ki jih je vložilo Društvo civilna iniciativa izbrisanih prebivalcev in drugi posamezniki.
The proceedings are currently pending (see paragraph 81 above).
Postopek trenutno še poteka (glej 81. odstavek).
Mr was born on 23 May 1969 in Peæ (Kosovo) in a Roma ethnic community.
se je rodil 23. maja 1969 v Peći (Kosovo) in je pripadnik romske etnične skupnosti.
According to the Government, he is a Serbian citizen.
Po navedbah vlade je srbski državljan.
He moved to Slovenia in 1985. He worked in a factory in Maribor until 31 May 1991. He was registered as a permanent resident in Slovenia from 6 October 1987 until 26 February 1992.
V Slovenijo se je preselil leta 1985. Do 31. maja 1991 je delal v tovarni v Mariboru. V Sloveniji je imel stalno prebivališče prijavljeno od 6. oktobra 1987 do 26. februarja 1992.
In 1991 he allegedly spent some time in Kosovo with his sick mother.
Leta 1991 naj bi nekaj časa preživel na Kosovu pri svoji bolni materi.
This appears to have been the reason why he did not apply for Slovenian citizenship at that time.
Zaradi tega takrat tudi ni zaprosil za slovensko državljanstvo.
In 1993 the applicant was detained by the Slovenian border police when re-entering the country after visiting relatives in Germany.
Leta 1993 je pritožnika pridržala slovenska obmejna policija, ko je ponovno vstopil v državo po obisku sorodnikov v Nemčiji.
His SFRY passport was taken away from him and he was kept in a transit centre for foreigners for ten days.
Odvzeli so mu potni list SFRJ in ga za deset dni zadržali v prehodnem domu za tujce.
The applicant maintainted that it was then that he learned about the &quot;erasure&quot;.
Pritožnik trdi, da je za izbris izvedel takrat.
Moreover, on 3 July 1993 he was deported to Tirana (Albania), allegedly without any decision.
julija 1993 so ga nato izgnali v Tirano (Albanija), po njegovih navedbah brez kakršne koli odločbe.
The Albanian police returned the applicant to Slovenia because he had no valid passport.
Albanska policija ga je vrnila v Slovenijo, ker ni imel veljavnega potnega lista.
He was again placed in the transit centre, from which he escaped during the night.
Ponovno so ga namestili v prehodni dom, iz katerega je ponoči pobegnil.
In 1993 the applicant fled to Germany, where he received a temporary residence permit for humanitarian reasons, owing to the unstable situation in Kosovo at the time.
Leta 1993 je pritožnik pobegnil v Nemčijo, kjer so mu iz humanitarnih razlogov, namreč zaradi negotovih razmer na Kosovu, izdali dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje.
On 9 August 1996 he married, who was born in Kosovo and was also a member of a Roma ethnic group.
avgusta 1996 se je poročil z, ki je bila rojena na Kosovu in je prav tako pripadnica romske etnične skupnosti.
They had four children between 1997 and 2003 while the family were living in Germany.
Med prebivanjem v Nemčiji so se jima med letoma 1997 in 2003 rodili štirje otroci.
In 2005 the German authorities dismissed the applicant&apos;s request for another extension of his residence permit because the overall situation in Kosovo was deemed stable enough for him to return there.
Leta 2005 so nemški organi zavrnili pritožnikovo prošnjo za ponovno podaljšanje dovoljenja za prebivanje, saj so menili da so splošne razmere na Kosovu dovolj stabilne, da se lahko vrne.
He was ordered to leave Germany with his family by 30 September 2005.
Postavili so mu rok, naj skupaj z družino zapusti Nemčijo do 30. septembra 2005.
At an unknown time, the applicant and his family submitted requests for asylum in Germany.
Na neugotovljeni datum so pritožnik in člani njegove družine v Nemčiji vložili prošnjo za azil.
Subsequently, the applicant and his family returned to Slovenia.
Pozneje se je pritožnik z družino vrnil v Slovenijo.
On 13 July 2005 the applicant and his family submitted an application for temporary residence permits.
julija 2005 je pritožnik z družino oddal prošnjo za dovoljenje za začasno prebivanje.
On 25 July 2005 they also applied for permanent residence permits under the Legal Status Act.
julija 2005 so zaprosili tudi za izdajo dovoljenj za stalno prebivanje po ZUSDDD.
Since they believed that they ran the risk of being deported, on 26.September 2005 the applicant and his family also submitted asylum requests.
Ker so menili, da jim grozi izgon iz države, so pritožnik in njegovi družinski člani 26. septembra 2005 oddali tudi prošnje za azil.
In addition, the applicant sought refugee status.
Poleg tega je pritožnik zaprosil za status begunca.
Further to the withdrawal of their asylum requests, on 19 October 2005 the Ministry terminated the proceedings.
Po umiku prošenj za azil je ministrstvo 19. oktobra 2005 ustavilo postopek.
The Ministry also ordered that the applicant and his family should return to Germany.
Prav tako je ministrstvo odredilo, da se pritožnik in člani njegove družine vrnejo v Nemčijo.
On 28 October 2005 the removal order was issued but was not executed.
28.oktobra 2005 je bil izdan nalog za izgon, vendar pa ni bil izvršen.
On 10 November 2005 a new removal order was issued, setting the date of removal for 18.November 2005. The applicant started proceedings before the Administrative Court.
novembra 2005 je bil izdan nov nalog za izgon, ki je kot datum navedel 18. november 2005. Pritožnik je sprožil postopek pred upravnim sodiščem.
On 15 November 2005 his request was granted.
novembra 2005 je bilo njegovemu predlogu ugodeno.
At that time the case also received considerable attention from the local and international community owing to the efforts of Amnesty International.
Takrat je bil primer zaradi prizadevanj Amnesty International deležen precejšnje pozornosti domače in tuje skupnosti.
On 27 February 2006 the family again applied for asylum in Slovenia.
februarja 2006 je družina ponovno zaprosila za azil v Sloveniji.
They were living in an asylum centre at the time.
Živeli so v azilnem domu.
On 28 April 2006 the applicant brought a complaint before the Administrative Court, alleging inaction on the part of the administrative authorities in the proceedings relating to the permanent residence permits for him, his wife and their four children.
aprila 2006.je pritožnik vložil tožbo pred upravnim sodiščem zaradi molka upravnega organa v postopku za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje zase, svojo ženo in štiri otroke.
On 19 July 2006 the German authorities informed the Slovenian authorities that Germany had jurisdiction under the Dublin Regulation to examine the asylum requests by the Berisha family.
julija 2006 so nemški organi obvestili slovenske, da je po Dublinski uredbi za obravnavo prošenj za azil družine Berisha pristojna Nemčija.
On 28 July 2006 the applicant&apos;s fifth child was born in Slovenia.
julija 2006 se je v Sloveniji rodil peti pritožnikov otrok.
On 30 October 2006 the Ministry decided, further to the above-mentioned decision of the German authorities, that it did not have jurisdiction to examine the asylum requests by the applicant and his family and that they would be handed over to Germany.
oktobra 2006 je ministrstvo glede na navedeno odločitev nemških organov odločilo, da ni pristojno za obravnavo prošenj za azil pritožnika in njegove družine ter da bodo izročeni Nemčiji.
The Ministry had also received fresh evidence that Mr and his family were asylum seekers in Germany, where they had received financial aid for that purpose.
Ministrstvo je tudi prejelo nove dokaze, da so Berisha in člani njegove družine zaprosili za azil v Nemčiji, kjer so v ta namen tudi prejeli denarno pomoč.
On 5 November 2006 the applicant and his family instituted proceedings in the Administrative Court, contesting the Ministry&apos;s decision.
novembra 2006 so pritožnik in člani njegove družine sprožili postopek pred upravnim sodiščem in izpodbijali sklep ministrstva.
On the same day they also requested the non-enforcement of the impugned decision and withdrew their application for asylum (see paragraph 147 above).
Istega dne so zaprosili tudi za neizvršitev izpodbijane odločbe in umaknili prošnjo za azil (glej 147. odstavek).
According to the applicant, on 7 November 2006 the Ministry again tried to transfer him and his family to Germany.
Po pritožnikovih besedah ga je ministrstvo 7. novembra 2006 skupaj z družino znova skušalo premestiti v Nemčijo.
On 15 November 2006 the Administrative Court annulled the removal order.
novembra 2006 je upravno sodišče razveljavilo nalog za izgon.
The Ministry lodged an appeal.
Ministrstvo je vložilo ugovor.
On 28.December 2006 the Supreme Court upheld the Ministry&apos;s decision of 30 October 2006 that Germany had jurisdiction under the Dublin Regulation to decide on the applicant&apos;s request for asylum.
decembra 2006 je vrhovno sodišče potrdilo sklep ministrstva z dne 30. oktobra 2006, da je po Dublinski uredbi za odločitev o pritožnikovi prošnji za azil pristojna Nemčija.
On 1 February 2007 the applicant and his family were handed over to Germany, where they have lived with &quot;toleration&quot; status (Duldung).
februarja 2007 so pritožnika in njegovo družino izročili Nemčiji, kjer živijo in imajo status &quot;toleriran&quot; (Duldung).