natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reaffirms the attachment of the States Parties to the right of individual petition as a cornerstone of the Convention mechanism and considers in this context that appropriate measures must be taken rapidly to dissuade clearly inadmissible applications, without, however, preventing well-founded applications from being examined by the Court, and to ensure that cases are dealt with in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity;
ponovno potrjuje zavezanost držav pogodbenic k pravici posameznika do pritožbe kot bistva mehanizma konvencije in meni, da morajo biti glede na to hitro sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za odvračanje očitno nesprejemljivih pritožb, ne da bi preprečili Sodišču obravnavanje utemeljenih pritožb, in zagotavljanje obravnave zadev po načelu subsidiarnosti;
Reiterates the call made for the consideration of additional measures with regard to access to the Court in the Interlaken Declaration and therefore invites the Committee of Ministers to continue to examine the issue of charging fees to applicants and other possible new procedural rules or practices concerning access to the Court;
ponavlja pozive za preučitev dodatnih ukrepov glede dostopa do Sodišča iz Interlakenske deklaracije in zato poziva Odbor ministrov k nadaljnji preučitvi vprašanja zaračunavanja taks pritožnikom in drugih možnih novih postopkovnih pravil ali praks v zvezi z dostopom do Sodišča;
Welcoming the improvements in the practice of interim measures already put in place by the Court and recalling that the Court is not an immigration Appeals Tribunal or a Court of fourth instance, emphasises that the treatment of requests for interim measures must take place in full conformity with the principle of subsidiarity and that such requests must be based on an assessment of the facts and circumstances in each individual case, followed by a speedy examination of, and ruling on, the merits of the case or of a lead case.
ob odobravanju izboljšav v praksi začasnih ukrepov, ki jih je Sodišče že vzpostavilo, in ob upoštevanju, da Sodišče ni pritožbeno sodišče za priseljevanje ali sodišče četrte stopnje, poudarja, da mora obravnavanje zahtev za začasne ukrepe potekati popolnoma skladno z načelom subsidiarnosti in da morajo takšne zahteve temeljiti na oceni dejstev in okoliščin v vsaki posamezni zadevi, ki ji sledi hitra obravnava in odločitev o vsebini zadeve ali o vodilnem primeru.
Stresses the importance of States Parties providing national remedies, where necessary with suspensive effect, which operate effectively and fairly and provide a proper and timely examination of the issue of risk in accordance with the Convention and in light of the Court&apos;s case law; and, while noting that they may challenge interim measures before the Court, reiterates the requirement for States Parties to comply with them;
poudarja pomen zagotavljanja notranjih pravnih sredstev držav pogodbenic, po potrebi z odložilnim učinkom, ki so učinkovita in poštena ter zagotavljajo ustrezno in pravočasno obravnavo vprašanja ogroženosti v skladu s konvencijo in glede na sodno prakso Sodišča in, medtem ko ugotavlja, da lahko izpodbijajo začasne ukrepe pred Sodiščem, ponavlja zahtevo, da jih države pogodbenice spoštujejo;
Underlines that applicants and their representatives should fully respect the Practice Direction on Requests for Interim Measures for their cases to be considered, and invites the Court to draw the appropriate conclusions if this Direction is not respected;
poudarja, da morajo pritožniki in njihovi zastopniki popolnoma spoštovati Navodilo za prakso pri zahtevah za začasne ukrepe zato, da se njihovi primeri obravnavajo, ter poziva Sodišče, da sprejme ustrezne odločitve, če to navodilo ni spoštovano;
Invites the Court, when examining cases related to asylum and immigration, to assess and take full account of the effectiveness of domestic procedures and, where these procedures are seen to operate fairly and with respect for human rights, to avoid intervening except in the most exceptional circumstances;
poziva Sodišče, da naj pri obravnavi zadev v zvezi z azilom in priseljevanjem oceni in v celoti upošteva učinkovitost domačih postopkov in kjer ugotovi, da so ti pošteni in človekove pravice spoštovane, ne posreduje, razen v najbolj izjemnih okoliščinah;
Further invites the Court to consider, with the State Parties, how best to combine the practice of interim measures with the principle of subsidiarity, and to take steps, including the consideration of putting in place a system, if appropriate, to trigger expedited consideration, on the basis of a precise and limited timeframe, of the merits of cases, or of a lead case, in which interim measures have been applied;
nadalje poziva Sodišče, da skupaj z državami pogodbenicami razmisli, kako najbolje uskladiti prakso začasnih ukrepov z načelom subsidiarnosti in sprejme ukrepe, po potrebi vključno s preučitvijo vzpostavitve sistema, ki bi v skladu z natančnim in omejenim časovnim okvirom sprožili hitro vsebinsko obravnavo zadeve ali vodilnega primera, pri katerem so bili uporabljeni začasni ukrepi;
Welcomes the contribution of the Secretary General, which recommends the provision to potential applicants and their legal representatives of objective and comprehensive information on the Convention and the case-law of the Court, in particular on the application procedure and the admissibility criteria, along with the detailed handbook on admissibility and the checklist prepared by the Registry of the Court, in order to avoid, insofar as possible, clearly inadmissible applications;
odobrava prispevek generalnega sekretarja, ki priporoča dajanje objektivnih in izčrpnih informacij potencialnim pritožnikom in njihovim pravnim zastopnikom o konvenciji in sodni praksi Sodišča, zlasti o postopku pritožbe in merilih sprejemljivosti, skupaj s podrobnim priročnikom o sprejemljivosti in kontrolnim listom, ki ju je pripravila Sodna pisarna Sodišča, zato da bi se kar najbolj izognili očitno nesprejemljivim pritožbam;
Calls on the Secretary General to implement rapidly, where necessary in co-operation with the European Union, the proposals regarding the provision of information and training contained in the report which he has submitted to the Committee of Ministers.
poziva generalnega sekretarja, da po potrebi v sodelovanju z Evropsko unijo hitro uresničuje predloge iz poročila, ki ga je predložil Odboru ministrov glede dajanja informacij in usposabljanja.
Reiterates calls made in this respect in the Interlaken Declaration and more particularly invites the States Parties to
ponavlja pozive Interlakenske deklaracije glede tega in zlasti poziva države pogodbenice, da
a. Ensure that effective domestic remedies exist, be they of a specific nature or a general domestic remedy, providing for a decision on an alleged violation of the Convention and, where necessary, its redress;
a) zagotovijo učinkovita notranja pravna sredstva, specifična ali splošna, ki omogočajo odločanje o domnevni kršitvi konvencije in po potrebi o zadoščenju;
b. Co-operate fully with the Committee of Ministers in the framework of the new methods of supervision of execution of judgments of the Court;
b) v celoti sodelujejo z Odborom ministrov v okviru novih metod nadzora nad izvrševanjem sodb Sodišča;
c. Ensure that the programmes for professional training of judges, prosecutors and other law enforcement officials as well as members of security forces contain adequate information regarding the well-established case-law of the Court concerning their respective professional fields;
c) zagotovijo, da programi za strokovno usposabljanje sodnikov, tožilcev in drugih uslužbencev organov pregona ter članov varnostnih sil vsebujejo ustrezne informacije o uveljavljeni sodni praksi Sodišča v zvezi z njihovimi posameznimi strokovnimi področji;
d. Consider contributing to translation into their national language of the Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria prepared by the Registry of the Court;
d) razmislijo o prispevku k prevodu Praktičnega vodiča po merilih sprejemljivosti, ki ga je pripravila Sodna pisarna Sodišča, v svoj jezik;
e. Consider contributing to the Human Rights Trust Fund.
e) razmislijo o prispevku v Skrbniški sklad za človekove pravice.
Invites the States Parties to devote all the necessary attention to the preparation of the national reports that they must present by the end of 2011, describing measures taken to implement relevant parts of the Interlaken Declaration and how they intend to address possible shortcomings, in order that these reports provide a solid basis for subsequent improvements at national level.
Poziva države pogodbenice, da posvetijo vso potrebno pozornost pripravi nacionalnih poročil, ki jih morajo predložiti do konca leta 2011, z opisom ukrepov, sprejetih za izvajanje ustreznih delov Interlakenske deklaracije, in načina, kako nameravajo obravnavati morebitne pomanjkljivosti, da bodo ta poročila zagotavljala trden temelj poznejšim izboljšavam na državni ravni.
Notes with satisfaction the first encouraging results of the implementation of the new single-judge formation.
z zadovoljstvom opaža prve spodbudne rezultate uvedbe sodnika posameznika.
It nevertheless considers that, beyond measures already taken or under examination, new provisions concerning filtering should be put in place;
Vseeno meni, da bi bilo treba poleg ukrepov, ki so bili že sprejeti ali se še preučujejo, uvesti nove določbe glede izbiranja;
As regards short term measures, invites the Court to consider and evaluate the system of filtering by judges, of the existing bench who dedicate their working time to single-judge work for a short period, and to continue to explore further possibilities of filtering not requiring amendment to the Convention;
glede kratkoročnih ukrepov poziva Sodišče, da preuči in oceni sistem izbiranja, ki ga opravljajo sodniki iz obstoječe sestave, ki kratko obdobje svojega delovnega časa namenjajo delu sodnika posameznika, ter še naprej išče nadaljnje mož­nosti izbiranja, ki ne zahtevajo sprememb konvencije;
As regards long-term measures, invites the Committee of Ministers to continue its reflection on more efficient filtering systems that would, if necessary, require amendments to the Convention.
kar zadeva dolgoročne ukrepe, poziva Odbor ministrov k nadaljnjemu razmišljanju o učinkovitejšem sistemu izbiranja, ki bi, če bi bilo potrebno, zahteval spremembe konvencije.
In this context, it recalls that specific proposals for such a filtering mechanism that would require amendments to the Convention have to be prepared by April 2012.
Glede na to opozarja, da bi konkretni predlogi za tak mehanizem izbiranja, ki bi zahteval spremembe konvencije, morali biti pripravljeni do aprila 2012.
D. Advisory opinions
D. Svetovalna mnenja
Bearing in mind the need for adequate national measures to contribute actively to diminishing the number of applications, invites the Committee of Ministers to reflect on the advisability of introducing a procedure allowing the highest national courts to request advisory opinions from the Court concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention that would help clarify the provisions of the Convention and the Court&apos;s case-law, thus providing further guidance in order to assist States Parties in avoiding future violations;
ob upoštevanju potrebe po ustreznih državnih ukrepih, ki bi aktivno prispevali k zmanjševanju števila pritožb, poziva Odbor ministrov k razmisleku o presoji, ali je priporočljivo uvesti postopek, ki bi najvišjim državnim sodiščem omogočal, da zaprosijo za svetovalna mnenja Sodišča v zvezi z razlago in uporabo konvencije, ki bi pomagala razjasniti določbe konvencije in sodno prakso Sodišča ter tako ponudila državam pogodbenicam nadaljnje usmeritve kot pomoč pri izogibanju kršitev v prihodnje;
Invites the Court to assist the Committee of Ministers in its consideration of the issue of advisory opinions.
poziva Sodišče, da pomaga Odboru ministrov pri obravnavi vprašanja svetovalnih mnenj.
E. Repetitive applications
E. Ponavljajoče se pritožbe
The Conference, whilst reiterating the calls made in the Interlaken Action Plan concerning repetitive applications and noting with satisfaction the first encouraging results of the new competences of committees of three judges
Konferenca ob tem, ko ponavlja pozive interlakenskega načrta delovanja glede ponavljajočih se pritožb in ko z zadovoljstvom opaža prve spodbudne rezultate novih pristojnosti senata treh sodnikov
Invites the States Parties to give priority to the resolution of repetitive cases by way of friendly settlements or unilateral declarations where appropriate;
poziva države pogodbenice, da, kadar je to primerno, pri reševanju ponavljajočih se zadev dajo prednost prijateljskim poravnavam ali enostranskim izjavam;
Underlines the importance of the active assistance of the Court to States Parties in their efforts to reach friendly settlements and to make unilateral declarations where appropriate and encourages the Court&apos;s role in this respect as well as the need for creating awareness of friendly settlements as an integral part in the Convention for settling disputes between parties to proceedings before the Court;
poudarja pomen aktivne pomoči Sodišča državam pogodbenicam v njihovih prizadevanjih za dosego prijateljskih poravnav in oblikovanju enostranskih izjav, kadar je to primerno, in spodbuja vlogo Sodišča pri tem, kakor tudi potrebo po ozaveščanju, da so prijateljske poravnave sestavni del konvencije za reševanje sporov med strankami v postopkih pred Sodiščem;
Considers that the Court, when referring to its &quot;well-established case-law&quot; must take account of legislative and factual circumstances and developments in the respondent State;
meni, da mora Sodišče pri sklicevanju na svojo &quot;uveljavljeno sodno prakso&quot; upoštevati zakonodajne in dejanske okoliščine ter razvoj dogodkov v toženi državi;
Welcomes the ongoing work of the Committee of Ministers on the elaboration of specific proposals that would require amendment to the Convention, in order to increase the Court&apos;s case-processing capacity, and considers that the proposals made should also enable the Court to adjudicate repetitive cases within a reasonable time;
odobrava sedanje delo Odbora ministrov glede priprave konkretnih predlogov, ki bi zahtevali spremembe konvencije, zato da se poveča zmogljivost Sodišča glede obravnavanja zadev, in meni, da bi morali dani predlogi tudi omogočati Sodišču, da o ponavljajočih se zadevah odloča v razumnem roku;
Welcomes the new Rule 61 of the Rules of the Court adopted by the Court on the pilot-judgment procedure.
odobrava novi 61. člen Poslovnika Sodišča, ki ga je Sodišče sprejelo po postopku pilotne sodbe.
Assures the Court of its full support to realise the Interlaken objectives;
zagotavlja Sodišču svojo polno podporo pri uresničevanju interlakenskih ciljev;
Reiterating the calls made in the Interlaken Action Plan and considering that the authority and credibility of the Court constitute a constant focus and concern of the States Parties, invites the Court to
ob ponavljanju pozivov interlakenskega načrta delovanja in ob upoštevanju, da sta avtoriteta in verodostojnost Sodišča stalno v središču pozornosti ter skrb držav pogodbenic, poziva Sodišče, da
a. Apply fully, consistently and foreseeably all admissibility criteria and the rules regarding the scope of its jurisdiction, ratione temporis, ratione loci, ratione personae and ratione materiae;
a) v celoti, dosledno in predvidljivo uporablja vsa merila sprejemljivosti in pravila glede obsega svoje pristojnosti, ratione temporis, ratione loci, ratione personae in ratione materiae;
b. Give full effect to the new admissibility criterion in accordance with the principle, according to which the Court is not concerned by trivial matters (de minimis non curat praetor);
b) v celoti uveljavi novo merilo sprejemljivosti v skladu z načelom, po katerem se Sodišče ne ukvarja z nepomembnimi zadevami (de minimis non curat praetor);
c. Confirm in its case law that it is not a fourth-instance court, thus avoiding the re-examination of issues of fact and law decided by national courts;
c) v svoji sodni praksi potrdi, da ni sodišče četrte stopnje in se s tem izogne ponovnemu obravnavanju dejstev in pravnih vprašanj, o katerih so odločila državna sodišča;
d. Establish and make public rules foreseeable for all the parties concerning the application of Article 41 of the Convention, including the level of just satisfaction which might be expected in different circumstances;
d) vzpostavi in javno objavi pravila, predvidljiva za vse pogodbenice, v zvezi z uporabo 41. člena konvencije, vključno z ravnijo pravičnega zadoščenja, ki bi bila lahko pričakovana v drugačnih okoliščinah;
e. Consider that decisions of the panels of five judges to reject requests for referral of cases to the Grand Chamber are clearly reasoned, thereby avoiding repetitive requests and ensuring better understanding of Chamber judgments;
e) preuči, da so odločitve zbora petih sodnikov, da zavrne zahteve za posredovanje zadev velikemu senatu, jasno utemeljene in se s tem izogne ponavljajočim se zahtevam ter zagotovi boljše razumevanje sodb senata;
f. Organise meetings with Government agents on a regular basis so as to further good cooperation;
f) organizira redna srečanja z zastopniki držav za izboljšanje sodelovanja;
g. Present to the Committee of Ministers proposals, on a budget-neutral basis, for the creation of a training unit for lawyers and other professionals;
g) predloži Odboru ministrov predloge, ki ne vplivajo na proračun, za oblikovanje enote za usposabljanje pravnikov in drugih strokovnjakov;
Notes with satisfaction the arrangements made within the Registry of the Court that have allowed better management of budgetary and human resources;
z zadovoljstvom opaža ukrepe Sodne pisarne Sodišča, ki so omogočili boljše upravljanje proračuna in človeških virov;
Welcomes the production by the Court&apos;s Registry of a series of thematic factsheets dealing with different case-law issues and encourages the Court to pursue this work in relation to its case-law on other substantive and procedural provisions which are frequently invoked by applicants;
pozdravlja vrsto tematskih informacij, ki jih je izdala Sodna pisarna Sodišča o različnih vprašanjih sodne prakse, ter spodbuja Sodišče, da nadaljuje s tem delom v zvezi s svojo sodno prakso glede drugih materialnih in postopkovnih določb, na katere se pritožniki pogosto sklicujejo;
Encourages furthermore the States Parties to second national judges and, where appropriate, other high-level independent lawyers to the Registry of the Court.
nadalje spodbuja države pogodbenice, da v Sodno pisarno Sodišča dodelijo nacionalne sodnike in, kadar je to primerno, druge neodvisne pravnike na visoki ravni.
The Conference, taking account of the work that has followed the Interlaken Conference at different levels within the Council of Europe, invites the Committee of Ministers to pursue preparatory work for elaboration of a simplified procedure for amending provisions relating to organisational matters, including reflection on the means of its introduction, i.e. a Statute for the Court or a new provision in the Convention.
Konferenca ob upoštevanju dela, ki je sledilo interlakenski konferenci na različnih ravneh znotraj Sveta Evrope, poziva Odbor ministrov, da nadaljuje pripravljalna dela za oblikovanje poenostavljenega postopka za spremembo določb, ki se nanašajo na organizacijske zadeve, vključno z razmišljanjem o načinu njegove uvedbe, tj. s statutom Sodišča ali novo določbo konvencije.
H. Supervision of the execution of judgments
H. Nadzor nad izvrševanjem sodb
Expects that new standard and enhanced procedures for supervision of the execution of judgments will bear fruit and welcomes the decision of the Committee of Ministers to assess their effectiveness at the end of 2011;
pričakuje, da bodo novi standardni in izboljšani postopki nadzora nad izvrševanjem sodb obrodili sadove in pozdravlja odločitev Odbora ministrov, da oceni njihovo učinkovitost ob koncu leta 2011;
Reiterates the calls made by the Interlaken Conference concerning the importance of execution of judgments and invites the Committee of Ministers to apply fully the principle of subsidiarity, by which the States Parties have in particular the choice of means to deploy in order to conform to their obligations under the Convention;
ponavlja pozive interlakenske konference glede pomena izvrševanja sodb in poziva Odbor ministrov, da v celoti uporablja načelo subsidiarnosti, po katerem imajo države pogodbenice še zlasti možnost izbire sredstev, ki jih lahko uporabijo za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti po konvenciji;
Recalls the special role given to the Committee of Ministers in exercising its supervisory function under the Convention and underlines the requirement to carry out its supervision only on the basis of a legal analysis of the Court&apos;s judgments.
se sklicuje na posebno vlogo, ki je bila dodeljena Odboru ministrov pri izvrševanju njegove nadzorne funkcije po konvenciji in poudarja zahtevo, da izvaja svoj nadzor samo na podlagi pravne analize sodb Sodišča.
I. Accession of the European Union to the Convention
I. Pristop Evropske unije h konvenciji
The Conference welcomes the progress made in the framework of negotiations on accession of the European Union to the Convention and encourages all the parties to conclude this work in order to transmit to the Committee of Ministers as soon as possible a draft agreement on accession and the proposals on necessary amendments to the Convention.
Konferenca pozdravlja napredek, ki je bil narejen v okviru pogajanj o pristopu Evropske unije h konvenciji, in spodbuja vse pogodbenice, da to delo zaključijo, da bi Odboru ministrov čim prej predali osnutek sporazuma o pristopu ter predloge o potrebnih spremembah konvencije.
Invites the States Parties, the Committee of Ministers, the Court and the Secretary General to ensure implementation of the present Follow-up Plan, which builds on the Interlaken Action Plan;
poziva države pogodbenice, Odbor ministrov, Sodišče in generalnega sekretarja, da zagotovijo uveljavitev tega načrta nadaljnjega spremljanja, ki nadgrajuje interlakenski načrt delovanja;
Invites the Committee of Ministers to
poziva Odbor ministrov k
a. Continue its reflection on the issue of charging fees to applicants, including other possible new procedural rules or practices concerning access to the Court, and on more efficient filtering systems that would, if necessary, require amendments to the Convention;
a) nadaljnjim razmišljanjem glede zaračunavanja taks pritožnikom, vključno z drugimi možnimi novimi postopkovnimi pravili ali praksami v zvezi z dostopom do Sodišča, in učinkovitejšega sistema izbiranja, ki bi, če bi bilo potrebno, zahteval spremembe konvencije;
b. Reflect on the advisability of introducing a procedure allowing the highest national courts to request advisory opinions from the Court;
b) razmisleku o priporočljivosti uvedbe postopka, ki bi najvišjim državnim sodiščem omogočal, da zaprosijo za svetovalna mnenja Sodišča;
c. Pursue preparatory work for elaboration of a simplified amendment procedure for provisions relating to organisational matters, including reflection on the means of its introduction, i.e. a Statute for the Court or a new provision in the Convention.
c) nadaljevanju priprav za oblikovanje poenostavljenega postopka za spremembo določb, ki se nanašajo na organizacijske zadeve, vključno z razmišljanjem o načinu njegove uvedbe, tj. s statutom Sodišča ali novo določbo konvencije;
Invites the Court to consider and evaluate the system of filtering by judges, of the existing bench who dedicate their working time to single-judge work for a short period, and to continue to explore further possibilities of filtering not requiring amendment to the Convention;
poziva Sodišče, da preuči in oceni sistem izbiranja, ki ga opravljajo sodniki iz obstoječe sestave, ki kratko obdobje svojega delovnega časa namenjajo delu sodnika posameznika, ter še naprej išče nadaljnje možnosti izbiranja, ki ne zahtevajo sprememb konvencije;