natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The judgement delivered on 25 June 1996 by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Amuur against France can be considered as vindicating this view.
Kot potrditev tega stališča lahko navedemo sodbo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice z dne 25.6.1996, v zadevi Amuur proti Franciji.
In that case, which concerned four asylum seekers held in the transit zone at Paris-Orly Airport for 20 days, the Court stated that &quot;The mere fact that it is possible for asylum seekers to leave voluntarily the country where they wish to take refuge cannot exclude a restriction (&quot;atteinte&quot;) on liberty....&quot; and held that &quot;holding the applicants in the transit zone.... was equivalent in practice, in view of the restrictions suffered, to a deprivation of liberty&quot;.
V tej zadevi, v kateri gre za štiri prosilce za azil, ki so se 20 dni nahajali v prehodnem območju na letališču Paris-Orly, je Sodišče odločilo, da »zgolj dejstvo, da lahko prosilci za azil prostovoljno zapustijo državo, v kateri iščejo zatočišče, ne more izključiti dejstva, da jim je omejena svoboda gibanja …« in da »je zadrževanje pritožnikov v prehodnem območju glede na omejitve, ki so jim bili podvrženi, … praktično enakovredno omejitvi svobode gibanja.«
Point of entry holding facilities have often been found to be inadequate, in particular for extended stays.
CPT je pogosto ugotovil, da so čakalni prostori na meji neprimerni, še posebej za daljše bivanje.
More specifically, CPT delegations have on several occasions met persons held for days under makeshift conditions in airport lounges.
Delegacije CPT-ja so večkrat naletele na ljudi, ki so več dni bivali v začasnih razmerah kar v različnih čakalnicah na letališču.
It is axiomatic that such persons should be provided with suitable means for sleeping, granted access to their luggage and to suitably-equipped sanitary and washing facilities, and allowed to exercise in the open air on a daily basis.
Nujno je, da se tem osebam preskrbijo primerna sredstva za spanje, omogoči dostop do njihove prtljage ter do primerno opremljenih toaletnih prostorov in umivalnice ter da jim je dovoljeno vsakodnevno gibanje na prostem.
Further, access to food and, if necessary, medical care should be guaranteed.
Nadalje bi jim moral biti zagotovljen dostop do hrane in, če je to potrebno, do zdravstvene oskrbe.
In certain countries, CPT delegations have found immigration detainees held in police stations for prolonged periods (for weeks and, in certain cases, months), subject to mediocre material conditions of detention, deprived of any form of activity and on occasion obliged to share cells with criminal suspects.
V nekaterih država so delegacije CPT-ja naletele na pridržane tujce, ki so bili daljše obdobje zadržani na policijskih postajah (tedne in v določenih primerih celo mesece) in podvrženi nemogočim materialnim pogojem bivanja; onemogočena jim je bila vsaka oblika aktivnosti, občasno so bili prisiljeni deliti celice z osumljenci kaznivih dejanj.
Such a situation is indefensible.
Za takšne primere ni opravičila.
The CPT recognises that, in the very nature of things, immigration detainees may have to spend some time in an ordinary police detention facility.
CPT priznava, da se po naravi stvari lahko zgodi, da morajo pridržani tujci preživeti nekaj časa tudi v policijskih prostorih.
However, conditions in police stations will frequently - if not invariably - be inadequate for prolonged periods of detention.
Vendar pa so pogoji na policijskih postajah pogosto - če ne kar praviloma - neprimerni za daljše bivanje.
Consequently, the period of time spent by immigration detainees in such establishments should be kept to the absolute minimum.
Zato mora biti čas, ki ga v teh prostorih preživijo pridržani tujci skrajšan na absolutni minimum.
On occasion, CPT delegations have found immigration detainees held in prisons.
V določenih primerih so delegacije CPT-ja naletele na pridržane tujce v zaporih.
Even if the actual conditions of detention for these persons in the establishments concerned are adequate -which has not always been the case - the CPT considers such an approach to be fundamentally flawed.
Četudi so dejanski pogoji bivanja teh oseb v zaporu primerni - kar ni vedno držalo - CPT meni, da je tovrsten pristop v osnovi napačen.
A prison is by definition not a suitable place in which to detain someone who is neither convicted nor suspected of a criminal offence.
Zapor namreč že po definiciji ni primeren prostor za bivanje osebe, ki ni niti obsojena niti osumljena kaznivega dejanja.
Admittedly, in certain exceptional cases, it might be appropriate to hold an immigration detainee in a prison, because of a known potential for violence.
CPT priznava, da je v nekaterih izjemnih primerih lahko primerno zadrževanje tujca, ki mu je odvzeta prostost, tudi v zaporu, npr. zaradi njegovega nagnjenja k nasilju.
Further, an immigration detainee in need of in-patient treatment might have to be accommodated temporarily in a prison health-care facility, in the event of no other secure hospital facility being available.
Lahko se zgodi, da bo tujec, ki mu je odvzeta prostost in je potreben bolnišnične nege, začasno moral biti hospitaliziran v zdravstvenem oddelku zapora, če ni na voljo druge varne bolnišnične nastanitve.
However, such detainees should be held quite separately from prisoners, whether on remand or convicted.
Ne glede na to, pa bi morale biti tako pridržane osebe nastanjene ločeno od zapornikov in pripornikov.
In the view of the CPT, in those cases where it is deemed necessary to deprive persons of their liberty for an extended period under aliens legislation, they should be accommodated in centres specifically designed for that purpose, offering material conditions and a regime appropriate to their legal situation and staffed by suitably-qualified personnel.
Po mnenju CPT-ja je v primerih, ko je potrebno po zakonodaji o tujcih osebi nujno omejiti prostost za daljši čas, te osebe potrebno nastaniti v centrih zasnovanih prav v ta namen. Taki centri morajo nuditi ustrezne materialne pogoje in hišni red, primeren pravnem položaju pridržanih tujcev, v njih pa mora biti zaposleno primerno kvalificirano osebje.
The Committee is pleased to note that such an approach is increasingly being followed in Parties to the Convention.
Odbor z veseljem ugotavlja, da tovrsten pristop uporablja vedno več držav članic Konvencije.
Obviously, such centres should provide accommodation which is adequately-furnished, clean and in a good state of repair, and which offers sufficient living space for the numbers involved.
Očitno je, da bi morali tovrstni centri zagotavljati primerno opremljene in čiste prostore, ki nudijo dovolj življenjskega prostora za število ljudi, ki so v njih nastanjeni.
Further, care should be taken in the design and layout of the premises to avoid as far as possible any impression of a carceral environment.
Nadalje, posebna pozornost bi morala biti posvečena zasnovi in načrtovanju tovrstnih centrov, pri čemer se je potrebno izogibati vtisu prisilnega okolja.
As regards regime activities, they should include outdoor exercise, access to a day room and to radio/television and newspapers/magazines, as well as other appropriate means of recreation (e.g. board games, table tennis).
Organizirane aktivnosti bi morale vključevati zunanje aktivnosti, dostop do dnevne sobe, do radia in televizije, do časopisov in revij ter tudi druga primerna sredstva za rekreacijo (npr. razne igre, namizni tenis).
The longer the period for which persons are detained, the more developed should be the activities which are offered to them.
Daljše kot je obdobje, v katerem je osebam omejena prostost, večji bi moral biti spekter aktivnosti, ki so na voljo tem osebam.
The staff of centres for immigration detainees have a particularly onerous task.
Osebje centrov za tujce, ki jim je omejena prostost, ima posebej zahtevno nalogo.
Firstly, there will inevitably be communication difficulties caused by language barriers.
Prvič, zaradi jezikovnih ovir bodo nedvomno soočeni s problemi pri komuniciranju.
Secondly, many detained persons will find the fact that they have been deprived of their liberty when they are not suspected of any criminal offence difficult to accept.
Drugič, veliko tujcev, ki jim je bila omejena prostost, čeprav niso osumljeni nikakršnega kaznivega dejanja, to dejstvo težko sprejmejo.
Thirdly, there is a risk of tension between detainees of different nationalities or ethnic groups.
Tretjič, obstaja tveganje napetosti med tujci različnih narodnosti in etičnih skupin.
Consequently, the CPT places a premium upon the supervisory staff in such centres being carefully selected and receiving appropriate training.
Zato CPT poudarja pomen dejstva, da do uslužbenci v takšnih centrih pazljivo izbrani in primerno izobraženi ter usposobljeni.
As well as possessing well-developed qualities in the field of interpersonal communication, the staff concerned should be familiarised with the different cultures of the detainees and at least some of them should have relevant language skills.
Prav tako je pomembno, da imajo dobro razvite sposobnosti med-osebne komunikacije ter da so seznanjeni z različnimi kulturami, vsaj nekaj pa bi jih moralo imeti tudi potrebno znanje tujih jezikov.
Further, they should be taught to recognise possible symptoms of stress reactions displayed by detained persons (whether post-traumatic or induced by socio-cultural changes) and to take appropriate action.
Nadalje bi morali biti uslužbenci tovrstnih centrov usposobljeni za prepoznavanje morebitnih simptomov stresnih reakcij pridržanih tujcev, (npr. post-travmatični stres, stres zaradi družbenih in kulturnih sprememb) ter znati primerno ukrepati v takih primerih.
Safeguards during detention
Varovala glede pridržanja tujcev
Immigration detainees should - in the same way as other categories of persons deprived of their liberty - be entitled, as from the outset of their detention, to inform a person of their choice of their situation and to have access to a lawyer and a doctor.
Pridržani tujci bi morali imeti enako kot ostale kategorije oseb, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, že od samega začetka pravico, da o prijetju obvestijo osebo po lastni izbiri ter da imajo dostop do odvetnika in zdravnika.
Further, they should be expressly informed, without delay and in a language they understand, of all their rights and of the procedure applicable to them.
Nadalje bi morali biti takoj in brez odlašanja, v jeziku, ki ga razumejo, obveščeni o vseh njihovih pravicah in o postopku, po katerem bodo obravnavani.
The CPT has observed that these requirements are met in some countries, but not in others.
CPT je opazil, da določene države tem zahtevam zadostijo, določene pa ne.
In particular, visiting delegations have on many occasions met immigration detainees who manifestly had not been fully informed in a language they understood of their legal position.
Delegacije CPT-ja so med obiski pogosto naletele na tujce, ki jim je bila omejena svoboda gibanja, vendar očitno niso bili polno obveščeni o njihovem pravnem položaju v jeziku, ki ga razumejo.
In order to overcome such difficulties, immigration detainees should be systematically provided with a document explaining the procedure applicable to them and setting out their rights.
Da bi prešli tovrstne težave, bi morali tujcem, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, sistematično izročati pisno obvestilo, v katerem bi jim razložili postopek, po katerem bodo obravnavani in jih poučili o njihovih pravicah.
This document should be available in the languages most commonly spoken by those concerned and, if necessary, recourse should be had to the services of an interpreter.
To obvestilo bi moral biti na voljo v jezikih, ki jih najpogosteje govorijo tisti, na katere se nanaša; če je potrebno pa bi moral biti na voljo tudi prevajalec.
The right of access to a lawyer should apply throughout the detention period and include both the right to speak with the lawyer in private and to have him present during interviews with the authorities concerned.
Pravica dostopa do odvetnika bi se morala nanašati na celotno obdobje omejitve prostosti in bi morala vključevati pravico do zaupnega pogovora z odvetnikom in pravico, da je odvetnik prisoten na zaslišanjih tujca s strani pristojnih organov.
All detention facilities for immigration detainees should provide access to medical care.
Vsi prostori, v katerih bivajo tujci, ki jim je omejena prostost, bi morali imeti zagotovljen dostop do zdravstvene oskrbe.
Particular attention should be paid to the physical and psychological state of asylum seekers, some of whom may have been tortured or otherwise ill-treated in the countries from which they have come.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo potrebno posvečati fizičnemu in psihičnemu stanju prosilcev za azil, med katerimi so lahko tudi osebe, ki so bile v državah, iz katerih prihajajo, podvržene mučenju ali drugemu slabemu ravnanju.
The right of access to a doctor should include the right - if a detainee so wishes - to be examined by a doctor of his choice; however, the detainee might be expected to cover the cost of such a second examination.
Pravica dostopa do zdravnika bi morala na željo tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost, vsebovati tudi pravico, da ga pregleda zdravnik po njegovi izbiri. Vendar pa je mogoče, da mora tujec v tem primeru sam kriti stroške pregleda s strani zdravnika po lastni izbiri.
More generally, immigration detainees should be entitled to maintain contact with the outside world during their detention, and in particular to have access to a telephone and to receive visits from relatives and representatives of relevant organisations.
Tujcem, ki jim je omejena prostost, mora biti omogočeno, da med omejitvijo prostosti vzdržujejo stike z zunanjim svetom, da imajo dostop do telefona ter da lahko sprejemajo obiske sorodnikov in predstavnikov različnih organizacij.
The prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment englobes the obligation not to send a person to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would run a real risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment.
Prepoved mučenja in nehumanega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja vsebuje tudi obveznost države, da tujca ne vrne v državo, v kateri obstaja velika verjetnost, da bo podvržen mučenju ali slabemu ravnanju.
Whether Parties to the Convention are fulfilling this obligation is obviously a matter of considerable interest to the CPT.
CPT namenja veliko pozornost vprašanju ali države članice Konvencije to obveznost izpolnjujejo.
What is the precise role that the Committee should seek to play in relation to that question
Kakšna je neposredna vloga Odbora glede tega vprašanja
Any communications addressed to the CPT in Strasbourg by persons alleging that they are to be sent to a country where they run a risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment are immediately brought to the attention of the European Commission of Human Rights.
Vsaka pisanja in sporočila naslovljena na CPT v Strasbourg s strani ljudi, ki trdijo, da bodo vrnjeni v državo, v kateri obstaja verjetnost, da bodo podvrženi mučenju ali bo slabemu ravnanju, CPT nemudoma posreduje Evropski komisiji za človekove pravice.
The Commission is better placed than the CPT to examine such allegations and, if appropriate, take preventive action.
Komisija ima boljše možnosti kot CPT, da preveri te trditve in če je potrebno tudi preventivno ukrepa.
If an immigration detainee (or any other person deprived of his liberty) interviewed in the course of a visit alleges that he is to be sent to a country where he runs a risk of being subjected to torture or ill-treatment, the CPT&apos;s visiting delegation will verify that this assertion has been brought to the attention of the relevant national authorities and is being given due consideration.
Če tujec, ki mu je omejena prostost (ali katerakoli druga oseba, ki ji je odvzeta prostost), med razgovorom s člani delegacije Odbora trdi, da bo vrnjen v državo, v kateri obstaja tveganje, da bo podvržen mučenju in slabemu ravnanju, delegacija najprej preveri ali so bile te trditve posredovane pristojnim nacionalnim oblastem in ustrezno obravnavane.
Depending on the circumstances, the delegation might request to be kept informed of the detainee&apos;s position and/or inform the detainee of the possibility of raising the issue with the European Commission of Human Rights (and, in the latter case, verify that he is in a position to submit a petition to the Commission).
Odvisno od okoliščin lahko delegacija zahteva, da jo obveščajo o položaju tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost in/ali obvestijo tujca, ki mu je omejena prostost o možnosti reševanja njegovega problema pred Evropsko komisijo za človekove pravice (v slednjem primeru nato delegacija preveri, če ima tujec možnost predložiti in predstaviti svojo trditev Komisiji).
However, in view of the CPT&apos;s essentially preventive function, the Committee is inclined to focus its attention on the question of whether the decision-making process as a whole offers suitable guarantees against persons being sent to countries where they run a risk of torture or ill-treatment.
Delegacija glede na primarno preventivno funkcijo CPT-ja največ pozornosti posveti vprašanju, ali celoten postopek odločanja nudi ustrezna jamstva, ki preprečujejo, da bi bili prijeti tujci poslani v države, kjer obstaja tveganje, da bodo podvrženi mučenju ali slabemu ravnanju.
In this connection, the CPT will wish to explore whether the applicable procedure offers the persons concerned a real opportunity to present their cases, and whether officials entrusted with handling such cases have been provided with appropriate training and have access to objective and independent information about the human rights situation in other countries.
V zvezi s tem bo CPT želel priti do ugotovitev ali veljavni postopek prizadetim osebam resnično nudi priložnost, da predstavijo svoje argumente, in so uradniki, ki jim je zaupano reševanje teh primerov, primerno izobraženi in usposobljeni ter imajo dostop do objektivnih in neodvisnih informacij o stanju na področju človekovih pravic v drugih državah.
Further, in view of the potential gravity of the interests at stake, the Committee considers that a decision involving the removal of a person from a State&apos;s territory should be appealable before another body of an independent nature prior to its implementation.
Zaradi potencialne resnosti interesov o katerih se odloča, Odbor ocenjuje, da bi morala še pred izvršitvijo odločbe obstajati možnost pritožbe na drug neodvisen organ zoper odločitev o odstranitvi osebe iz države.
Means of coercion in the context of expulsion procedures
Uporaba prisile v postopku izgona
Finally, the CPT must point out that it has received disturbing reports from several countries about the means of coercion employed in the course of expelling immigration detainees.
Na koncu želi CPT izpostaviti dejstvo, da je prejel zaskrbljujoča poročila iz več držav, ki se nanašajo na uporabo prisile v postopku izgona tujcev, ki jim je bila omejena prostost.
Those reports have contained in particular allegations of beating, binding and gagging, and the administration of tranquillizers against the will of the persons concerned.
Ta poročila so vsebovala trditve o pretepanju, vklepanju in vezanju ter tlačenju kosov oblačil v usta, oz. prevezovanju ust s kosi oblačil in uporabljanje pomirjeval proti volji prizadetih oseb.
The CPT recognises that it will often be a difficult task to enforce an expulsion order in respect of a foreign national who is determined to stay on a State&apos;s territory.
CPT se zaveda, da je odločitev o izgonu tujega državljana, ki je odločen, da bo ostal v določeni državi, pogosto težko izvesti.
Law enforcement officials may on occasion have to use force in order to effect such a removal.
Policisti so lahko prisiljeni uporabiti silo, da uspešno izvršijo takšen izgon.
However, the force used should be no more than is reasonably necessary.
Vendar uporabljena sila ne bi smela biti večja kot je razumno in nujno potrebno.
It would, in particular, be entirely unacceptable for persons subject to an expulsion order to be physically assaulted as a form of persuasion to board a means of transport or as punishment for not having done so.
Še posebej je popolnoma nesprejemljivo, če so osebe, za katere je izdan nalog o izgonu fizično napadene v interesu prepričevanja k vkrcanju na določena prevozna sredstva ali kot kazen, ker tega niso storile.
Further, the Committee must emphasise that to gag a person is a highly dangerous measure.
Odbor mora tudi poudariti, da je prevezovanje oseb čez usta zelo nevaren ukrep.
The CPT also wishes to stress that any provision of medication to persons subject to an expulsion order must only be done on the basis of a medical decision and in accordance with medical ethics.
CPT želi tudi poudariti, da je lahko kakršnokoli dajanje zdravil osebam, za katere je izdan nalog o izgonu, dopustno samo na podlagi medicinske odločitve in v skladu z medicinsko etiko.
Involuntary placement in psychiatric establishments
Prisilna hospitalizacija v psihiatričnih ustanovah
The CPT is called upon to examine the treatment of all categories of persons deprived of their liberty by a public authority, including persons with mental health problems.
Dolžnost CPT-ja je, da preučuje ravnanja z vsemi kategorijami oseb, ki jim je javna oblast odvzela prostost ali omejila svobodo gibanja. V to kategorijo so vključene tudi osebe, ki imajo težave z duševnim zdravjem.
Consequently, the Committee is a frequent visitor to psychiatric establishments of various types.
Zato Odbor pogosto obišče tudi različne vrste psihiatričnih ustanov.
Establishments visited include mental hospitals accommodating, in addition to voluntary patients, persons who have been hospitalised on an involuntary basis pursuant to civil proceedings in order to receive psychiatric treatment.
Obiskane ustanove vključujejo psihiatrične bolnice, v katerih so ob prostovoljnih pacientih, nastanjene tudi osebe, ki so bile prisilno hospitalizirane zaradi psihiatričnega zdravljenja na podlagi civilnih postopkov.
The CPT also visits facilities (special hospitals, distinct units in civil hospitals, etc) for persons whose admission to a psychiatric establishment has been ordered in the context of criminal proceedings.
CPT obiskuje tudi ustanove oz. prostore (posebne bolnice, ločeni oddelki v civilnih bolnicah, itd.), kjer se nahajajo osebe, ki so bile sprejete v psihiatrično ustanovo v okviru kazenskega postopka.
Psychiatric facilities for prisoners who develop a mental illness in the course of their imprisonment, whether located within the prison system or in civil psychiatric institutions, also receive close attention from the CPT.
Pozornost CPT-ja so deležni tudi psihiatrični oddelki za zapornike, pri katerih se razvije duševna bolezen v času njihovega bivanja v zaporu, ne glede na to ali so locirani znotraj zapora ali v civilni psihiatrični ustanovi.
When examining the issue of health-care services in prisons in its 3rd General Report (cf. CPT/Inf (93) 12, paragraphs 30 to 77), the CPT identified a number of general criteria which have guided its work (access to a doctor; equivalence of care; patient&apos;s consent and confidentiality; preventive health care; professional independence and professional competence).
CPT je pri preučevanju problema zdravstvene službe v zaporih v svojem tretjem splošnem poročilu (glej CPT/Inf (91) 12), odstavki 30 - 70), postavil številne splošne kriterije, ki so vodili njegovo delo (dostop do zdravnika; enakost oskrbe; pacientova privolitev in zaupnost; preventivna zdravstvena nega; poklicna neodvisnost in strokovna usposobljenost).
Those criteria also apply to involuntary placement in psychiatric establishments.
Ti kriteriji se uporabljajo tudi za prisilno hospitalizacijo v psihiatričnih ustanovah.