natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ensure and seek to demonstrate that the process and the treatment of the parties is fair and balanced, including through an effective communications strategy.
zagotoviti in nazorno prikazati, da sta postopek in obravnava sprtih strani pravična in uravnotežena, pri čemer velja uporabiti tudi učinkovite strategije komuniciranja;
Be transparent with the conflict parties regarding the laws and norms that guide their involvement.
sprtim stranem odprto pojasniti zakonodajo in norme, ki urejajo njihovo delovanje;
Not accept conditions for support from external actors that would affect the impartiality of the process.
odkloniti pogojevano podporo zunanjih akterjev, ki bi vplivala na nepristranskost postopka;
Avoid association with punitive measures against conflict parties by other actors and minimize public criticism of the parties as much as possible, while maintaining frank exchanges in private.
izogibati se navezovanju na kazenske ukrepe proti sprtim stranem drugih akterjev in čim bolj omejiti javno kritiziranje strani, hkrati pa nadaljevati odkrit pogovor v zaupnem okolju;
Handover to another mediator, or mediating entity, if they feel unable to maintain a balanced and impartial approach.
prepustiti postopek drugemu mediatorju ali mediatorskemu subjektu, če se ne počutijo sposobne ohranjati uravnoteženega in nepristranskega pristopa.
Inclusivity
Vključenost
Inclusivity refers to the extent and manner in which the views and needs of conflict parties and other stakeholders are represented and integrated into the process and outcome of a mediation effort.
Pojem vključenosti se nanaša na obseg in način, po katerem so stališča in potrebe sprtih strani in drugih udeležencev predstavljeni ter vključeni v postopek in izid mediacije.
An inclusive process is more likely to identify and address the root causes of conflict and ensure that the needs of the affected sectors of the population are addressed.
Vključujoči postopek bo bolj verjetno prepoznal in odpravil glavne vzroke spora ter zagotovil, da so upoštevane potrebe prizadetih skupin prebivalstva.
Inclusivity also increases the legitimacy and national ownership of the peace agreement and its implementation.
Vključenost prav tako prispeva k večji verodostojnosti in nacionalnemu lastništvu mirovnega sporazuma in njegovega izvajanja.
In addition, it reduces the likelihood of excluded actors undermining the process.
Poleg tega zmanjšuje verjetnost, da bi izključeni akterji ovirali postopek.
An inclusive process does not imply that all stakeholders participate directly in the formal negotiations, but facilitates interaction between the conflict parties and other stakeholders and creates mechanisms to include all perspectives in the process.
Vključujoči postopek ne pomeni, da vsi udeleženci v formalnih pogajanjih sodelujejo neposredno, temveč je namenjen zagotavljanju stikov med sprtimi stranmi in drugimi udeleženci ter ustvarja mehanizme za vključitev vseh vidikov v postopek.
It cannot be assumed that conflict parties have legitimacy with, or represent, the wider public.
Ni mogoče vnaprej domnevati, da sprte strani uživajo verodostojnost v širši javnosti ali da jo predstavljajo.
Mediation efforts that involve only armed groups may send the signal that violence is rewarded.
Mediacija, v kateri sodelujejo samo oborožene skupine, lahko na primer daje vtis, da se nasilje nagrajuje.
In addition to generating resentment within other sectors of society, this could encourage others to take up arms in order to get a place at the negotiating table.
To ne vzbuja zgolj nezadovoljstva v drugih družbenih skupinah, temveč bi jih lahko spodbudilo, da si poskušajo mesto za pogajalsko mizo pridobiti z orožjem.
Civil society actors can play a critical role in increasing the legitimacy of a peace process and are potentially important allies.
Civilnodružbena gibanja imajo lahko odločilno vlogo pri krepitvi verodostojnosti mirovnega procesa in so lahko pomembni zavezniki.
Women leaders and women&apos;s groups are often effective in peacemaking at community levels and should therefore be more strongly linked to the high-level mediation process.
Ženske na vodilnih položajih in ženska združenja so pogosto učinkovita pri vzpostavljanju miru na ravni skupnosti in bi morala biti bolj vključena v uradne postopke mediacije na višjih ravneh.
However, support from civil society and other stakeholders cannot be taken for granted, as some of these actors may have hard-line positions and oppose the mediation.
Vendar pa podpora civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev ni samoumevna, saj imajo lahko nekateri od teh akterjev skrajne zahteve in nasprotujejo mediaciji.
In designing an inclusive process, mediators face a number of challenges.
Pri pripravi vključujočega postopka se mediatorji srečujejo s številnimi izzivi.
There may be instances in which not all conflict parties want to engage in mediation or have sufficient levels of coherence to negotiate, making only a partial process possible.
Lahko se zgodi, da v mediaciji nočejo sodelovati vse sprte strani ali niso dovolj enotne za pogajanja, zaradi česar je mogoč samo delni postopek.
Arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court, sanctions regimes, and national and international counter-terrorism policies also affect the manner in which some conflict parties may be engaged in a mediation process.
Zaporni nalogi Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, sankcije ter domači in mednarodni ukrepi v boju proti terorizmu prav tako vplivajo na to, kako nekatere sprte strani sodelujejo v postopku mediacije.
Mediators need to protect the space for mediation and their ability to engage with all actors while making sure that the process respects the relevant legal limitations.
Mediatorji morajo zagotoviti prostor za mediacijo in zavarovati svojo sposobnost sodelovanja z vsemi akterji, hkrati pa poskrbeti, da je postopek skladen z ustreznimi pravnimi okviri.
In seeking to broaden the process to other stakeholders, mediators may also face constraints from conflict parties who generally seek to determine who, how and when different actors are brought into the process.
V prizadevanju, da bi v postopek vključili še druge udeležence, se mediatorji lahko prav tako srečajo z odklonilnimi stališči in mnenji sprtih strani, ki običajno želijo imeti odločilno besedo pri določanju akterjev, ki naj bodo vključeni v postopek, načinih in fazi njihove vključitve v proces.
In some instances, more exclusive dialogue with conflict parties may be required to move the process forward expeditiously, for example in negotiating ceasefires, especially where parties feel too exposed politically or if their security may be compromised.
Včasih je potreben bolj zaprt dialog s sprtimi stranmi, da postopek steče hitreje, kot na primer v mirovnih pogajanjih, še zlasti tam, kjer se strani počutijo preveč politično izpostavljene ali če je ogrožena njihova varnost.
Mediators need to gauge the comfort levels of conflict parties and convince them of the value of broadening participation.
Mediatorji morajo znati preceniti občutke sprtih strani in jih prepričati o pomenu vključevanja drugih akterjev.
They also have to balance having a transparent process with protecting the confidentiality of the talks.
Prav tako morajo zagotavljati ravnotežje med preglednostjo postopka in zaupnostjo pogovorov.
Mediators have to grapple with the potential tension between inclusivity and efficiency.
Mediatorji morajo tudi ustrezno oceniti razmerje med vključenostjo in učinkovitostjo.
Mediation processes become more complex (and may be overloaded) when the consultation base expands and/or multiple forums are used to engage actors at different levels.
Postopek mediacije postane bolj zapleten (lahko celo preveč), kadar se krog udeležencev razširi ali so uporabljeni različni forumi za sodelovanje z akterji na različnih ravneh.
In addition, it may be difficult to engage interest groups that are not easily defined or lack clear leadership, for example social movements and youth groups.
Poleg tega je včasih težko pritegniti interesne skupine, ki jih ni lahko opredeliti ali ki nimajo jasnih vodstvenih struktur ali voditeljev, na primer družbena gibanja in skupine mladih.
These kinds of issues put a premium on stakeholder mapping, planning and management of the process.
Navedeno otežuje opredelitev udeležencev, načrtovanje in vodenje postopka.
Building on a comprehensive mapping of all conflict parties and stakeholders, mediators should:
Na podlagi poglobljene analize vseh strani v sporu in ustreznih udeležencev morajo mediatorji:
Identify the level of inclusivity needed for the mediation to start and required for a durable peace that addresses the needs of all affected by the conflict.
opredeliti, kako vključujoč postopek je potreben za začetek mediacije in za zagotovitev trajnega miru, ki upošteva potrebe vseh prizadetih v sporu;
Communicate with any party or actor necessary to address the conflict, with the knowledge of the other negotiating parties.
navezati stike z vsemi stranmi ali akterji, ki so potrebni za reševanje spora, s čimer so seznanjene tudi druge strani v pogajanjih;
Limit contacts with actors that have been indicted by the International Criminal Court to what is necessary for the mediation process.
omejiti stike z akterji, za katere je Mednarodno kazensko sodišče izdalo obtožnico, na zgolj nujne za nemoten postopek mediacije;
Promote understanding among conflict parties of the value of broader participation and minimize preconditions for participation in the process.
ozaveščati sprte strani o pomenu vključenosti in omejiti pogojevanje za sodelovanje v postopku;
Ensure systematic and structured consultation with women&apos;s groups early in the process to allow for meaningful participation, with specific efforts to include them in the mediation process.
zagotoviti sistematično in strukturirano posvetovanje z ženskimi združenji že na začetku postopka, kar bo omogočilo njihovo vsebinsko sodelovanje, ter si posebej prizadevati, da se vključijo v postopek mediacije;
Encourage conflict parties to include women in their delegations.
spodbujati sprte strani, da v svoje delegacije vključujejo ženske;
Identify partners to help build the capacity of civil society and other relevant stakeholders to engage effectively.
opredeliti partnerje, ki lahko pomagajo pri usposabljanju civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev za učinkovito sodelovanje;
Develop mechanisms to broaden participation in the process, and to engage and include the different perspectives within civil society and other stakeholders, throughout the various phases of the peace process.
najti mehanizme za zagotavljanje široke udeležbe v postopku ter za spodbujanje sodelovanja in vključevanja različnih pogledov znotraj civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev v vseh fazah mirovnega procesa;
Use different forms of media, including social media and opinion polls, to expand participation, inform and engage the public and identify potential points of contention.
uporabiti različne medije, tudi družabne medije in javnomnenjske raziskave, za večjo vključenost in obveščenost javnosti ter za prepoznavo morebitnih spornih vprašanj.
National ownership
Nacionalno lastništvo
National ownership implies that conflict parties and the broader society commit to the mediation process, agreements and their implementation.
Nacionalno lastništvo zagotavlja, da so sprte strani in širša družba zavezane postopku mediacije, dogovorom in njihovemu izvajanju.
This is of critical importance because it is the communities who have suffered the major impact of the conflict, the conflict parties, who have to make the decision to stop the fighting, and society as a whole that must work towards a peaceful future.
To je ključnega pomena, saj si morajo skupnosti, ki so zaradi spora največ pretrpele, sprte strani, ki morajo sprejeti odločitev o prenehanju bojev, in družba kot celota prizadevati za mirno skupno prihodnost.
While solutions cannot be imposed, mediators can be helpful in generating ideas to resolve conflict issues.
Čeprav rešitve ne morejo biti vsiljene, so lahko mediatorji v pomoč z dajanjem predlogov za ureditev spornih vprašanj.
It is challenging, however, for an external mediator to identify whose ownership is necessary and to facilitate ownership of the process beyond people in positions of power.
Za zunanjega mediatorja je izziv prepoznati, kdo je tisti, ki mora imeti lastništvo, in omogočiti, da lastništvo v procesu ne bo omejeno le na ljudi na položajih moči.
Cultivating and exercising ownership may require strengthening the negotiating capabilities of one or more of the conflict parties, as well as civil society and other stakeholders, to enable their effective participation in the process and ability to engage on often complex issues.
Za ohranjanje in uresničevanje lastništva je morda treba okrepiti pogajalske sposobnosti ene ali več sprtih strani, pa tudi civilne družbe in drugih udeležencev, da lahko učinkovito sodelujejo v postopku in da so sposobni sodelovati tudi pri pogosto zelo zahtevnih vprašanjih.
The extent to which the process is inclusive has a direct impact on the depth of ownership.
Odprtost postopka in vključenost vanj neposredno vpliva na raven lastništva.
National ownership requires adapting mediation processes to local cultures and norms while also taking into account international law and normative frameworks.
Poleg upoštevanja mednarodnega prava in normativnih okvirov nacionalno lastništvo zahteva, da postopki mediacije upoštevajo lokalne kulturne posebnosti in običaje.
In promoting national ownership, mediators should:
Pri spodbujanju nacionalnega lastništva morajo mediatorji:
Consult closely with the conflict parties on the design of the mediation process.
izvesti temeljito posvetovanje s sprtimi stranmi o zasnovi postopka mediacije;
Inform civil society and other stakeholders about developments in the peace process (respecting confidentiality, where required) and create opportunities and support for them to engage on procedure and substance.
obveščati civilno družbo in druge udeležence o razvoju mirovnega procesa (ob spoštovanju zaupnosti, kjer je to potrebno) ter ustvariti možnosti, da sodelujejo pri odločanju o postopku in vsebini, in jih pri tem podpreti;
Guide conflict parties and help them generate ideas for discussion, ensuring they can claim credit for agreements reached.
usmerjati sprte strani, jim pomagati pri iskanju idej za razpravo in pri tem poskrbeti, da si lahko lastijo zasluge za dosežene sporazume;
Identify which conflict parties may need support to strengthen their negotiation capacity and facilitate access to capacity-building support.
prepoznati, katere strani v sporu potrebujejo podporo pri krepitvi pogajalskih sposobnosti, in jim olajšati dostop do tovrstnega usposabljanja;
Encourage and enable conflict parties to inform and consult with their constituencies, including the rank and file, during the mediation process.
spodbujati in omogočiti, da sprte strani med postopkom mediacije obveščajo vse skupine, ki jih v postopku zastopajo, na vseh ravneh in se z njimi posvetujejo;
Be aware of the specific cultural approaches to negotiation and communication and leverage those approaches to the greatest advantage of the process; liaise with and ensure support for local peacemakers and, wherever appropriate, draw on indigenous forms of conflict management and dispute resolution.
poznati posebnosti kulturnih pristopov v pogajanjih in komuniciranju ter jih čim bolj izkoristiti v prid postopka; povezovati se z lokalnimi mirovniki, jim zagotavljati podporo ter se, kjer je to primerno, opirati na v danem okolju tradicionalne oblike obvladovanja in reševanja sporov;
Protect the mediation process from the undue influence of other external actors, especially with regard to unrealistic external deadlines or incompatible agendas.
zaščititi postopek mediacije pred neprimernim pritiskom drugih zunanjih akterjev, predvsem kar zadeva postavljanje nestvarnih rokov ali nezdružljivih ciljev;
Sensitize conflict parties to the need to balance national ownership with the importance of marshalling international support for the implementation of an agreement.
stranem v sporu ustrezno predstaviti potrebo po ravnotežju med nacionalnim lastništvom in zagotovitvijo mednarodne podpore izvajanju sporazuma;
Design a communications strategy to manage expectations, in terms of both what, and the speed at which, the process can deliver.
oblikovati komunikacijsko strategijo za obvladovanje pričakovanja, kakšen in kako hiter izid lahko prinese postopek.
International law and normative frameworks
Mednarodno pravo in normativni okviri
Mediation takes place within normative and legal frameworks, which may have different implications for different mediators.
Mediacija poteka v normativnih in pravnih okvirih, ki imajo lahko za različne mediatorje različne posledice.
Mediators conduct their work on the basis of the mandates they receive from their appointing entity and within the parameters set by the entity&apos;s rules and regulations.
Mediatorji opravljajo svoje delo na podlagi mandata, ki jim ga podeli subjekt, ki jih napoti, ter po pravilih in predpisih tega subjekta.
Thus, United Nations mediators work within the framework of the Charter of the United Nations, relevant Security Council and General Assembly resolutions and the Organization&apos;s rules and regulations.
Tako mediatorji Organizacije združenih narodov delujejo na podlagi Ustanovne listine Organizacije združenih narodov, resolucij Varnostnega sveta in Generalne skupščine ter pravil in predpisov OZN.
Mediators also conduct their work within the framework constituted by the rules of international law that govern the given situation, most prominently global and regional conventions, international humanitarian law, human rights and refugee laws and international criminal law, including, where applicable, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Pri svojem delu spoštujejo pravila mednarodnega prava, ki veljajo v danem položaju, predvsem najpomembnejših mednarodnih in regionalnih konvencij, mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, prava človekovih pravic, prava beguncev in mednarodnega kazenskega prava ter, kjer je primerno, Rimskega statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča.
In addition to binding legal obligations, normative expectations impact on the mediation process, for example regarding justice, truth and reconciliation, the inclusion of civil society, and the empowerment and participation of women in the process.
Na postopek mediacije poleg obvezujočih pravnih zavez vplivajo normativna pričakovanja, na primer pravičnost, resnica in sprava, vključevanje civilne družbe ter krepitev vloge žensk in njihova udeležba v postopku.
Consistency with international law and norms contributes to reinforcing the legitimacy of a process and the durability of a peace agreement.
Skladnost z mednarodnim pravom in normami prispeva k večji verodostojnosti postopka in veljavnosti mirovnega sporazuma.
It also helps to marshal international support for implementation.
Prav tako pripomore k pridobivanju mednarodne podpore za izvajanje sporazuma.
However, balancing the demands of conflict parties with the normative and legal frameworks can be a complex process.
Vendar pa utegne biti usklajevanje zahtev sprtih strani na eni ter normativnih in pravnih okvirov na drugi strani zahteven proces.
Mediators frequently have to grapple with the urgency of ending violence in contexts where there is also a clear need to address human rights violations and other international crimes.
Mediatorji se morajo pogosto spoprijeti s potrebo po takojšnji ustavitvi nasilja v okolju, v katerem so bile kršene človekove pravice in storjeni drugi mednarodni zločini.
The applicable law may not be the same for all conflict parties, or their understanding of that law may vary.
Ni nujno, da je veljavni pravni red za vse sprte strani enak, razlikuje se lahko tudi njihovo razumevanje tega reda.
In addition, while there is a growing international consensus on some norms, not all norms are equally applied in different national contexts and there can be different interpretations within a given society.
Čeprav o številnih normah obstaja vedno večje mednarodno soglasje, se ne uporabljajo vse enako v različnih nacionalnih okvirih ali pa se v neki družbi različno razlagajo.
Mediators must be briefed and familiar with the applicable international law and normative frameworks and should:
Mediatorji morajo biti seznanjeni z veljavnim mednarodnim pravom in normativnimi okviri ter morajo:
Be clear and convey their mandates and the legal parameters applicable to their work.
jasno predstaviti svoj mandat in pravna merila, ki veljajo za njihovo delo;
Ensure that the parties understand the demands and limits of applicable conventions and international laws.
zagotoviti, da vse strani razumejo zahteve in omejitve, ki izhajajo iz veljavnih konvencij in pravil mednarodnega prava;
Ensure that communications with the conflict parties and other stakeholders on legal matters and normative expectations are consistent; this is particularly important in instances of co-led or joint mediations.
zagotoviti, da je komuniciranje s sprtimi stranmi in drugimi udeleženci o pravnih zadevah in normativnih pričakovanjih dosledno, kar je še zlasti pomembno pri mediaciji pod vodstvom več mediatorjev ali pri skupni mediaciji;
Be clear that they cannot endorse peace agreements that provide for amnesties for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes or gross violations of human rights, including sexual and gender-based violence; amnesties for other crimes and for political offences, such as treason or rebellion, may be considered - and are often encouraged - in situations of non-international armed conflict.
jasno povedati, da ne morejo podpreti mirovnih sporazumov, ki predvidevajo pomilostitev za genocid, zločine zoper človečnost, vojne zločine in hude kršitve človekovih pravic, vključno s spolnim nasiljem in nasiljem na podlagi spola; pomilostitve za druge zločine in politične prestopke, kot sta izdaja ali upor, so mogoče in pogosto tudi spodbujane, kadar gre za notranje oborožene spopade;
Explore with the conflict parties and other stakeholders the timing and sequencing of judicial and non-judicial approaches to address crimes committed during the conflict.
s sprtimi stranmi in drugimi udeleženci preučiti časovni okvir ter zaporedje sodnih in nesodnih pristopov za obravnavo zločinov, zagrešenih v konfliktu;
Balance the need to adhere to international norms without overtly taking on an advocacy role; facilitate access for partners and civil society actors to engage directly with conflict parties and other stakeholders regarding applicable norms.
paziti na potrebo po spoštovanju mednarodnih norm, vendar ne smejo odkrito prevzeti vloge prepričevalca; olajšati partnerjem in civilni družbi neposreden dialog s sprtimi stranmi in drugimi udeleženci o veljavnih normah.
Coherence, coordination and complementarity of the mediation effort
Povezanost, usklajenost in dopolnjevanje pri mediaciji
The increasing number and range of actors involved in mediation makes coherence, coordination and complementarity of mediation efforts both essential and challenging.
Zaradi vse večjega števila in raznovrstnosti udeležencev mediacije so povezanost, usklajenost in dopolnjevanje bistveni, četudi zahtevni elementi.
Coherence encompasses agreed and/or coordinated approaches, while complementarity refers to the need for a clear division of labour based on comparative advantage among mediation actors operating at the different levels.
Usklajenost vključuje dogovorjene ali usklajene pristope, medtem ko se dopolnjevanje nanaša na potrebo po jasni delitvi dela med nosilci mediacije na različnih ravneh glede na njihove primerjalne prednosti.
The actions of the international community, including the United Nations, regional, subregional and other international organizations, States, NGOs, national and local actors, all have an impact on mediation, even if their engagement in a given mediation process may vary.
Ukrepi mednarodne skupnosti, vključno z Organizacijo združenih narodov, regionalnimi, subregionalnimi in drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami, državami, nevladnimi organizacijami, nacionalnimi in lokalnimi akterji, vplivajo na mediacijo, tudi če so stopnje njihovega sodelovanja v danem postopku mediacije različne.