natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pending the elimination of the inconsistency established in paragraph 1 above, no deportation order as referred to in section 28 of the Aliens Act shall be made against citizens of any other republic of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia if on the date of the plebiscite of 23 December 1990 they were registered as having permanent residence in, and are actually resident in, the Republic of Slovenia.
Do odprave ugotovljene neskladnosti iz prvega odstavka izreka se zoper državljana druge republike nekdanje Socialistične federativne republike Jugoslavije ne sme izreči ukrep prisilne odstranitve tujca iz 28. člena Zakona o tujcih, če je imel na dan plebiscita 23. 12. 1990 na območju Republike Slovenije prijavljeno stalno prebivališče in v Republiki Sloveniji tudi dejansko živi.
The Constitutional Court finds that the provisions of subsection 2 of section 13 and subsection 1 of section 16 of the Aliens Act should not apply to citizens of other republics who have not acquired the citizenship of the Republic of Slovenia.
Ustavno sodišče ugotavlja, da se določbi drugega odstavka 13. člena in prvega odstavka 16. člena ZTuj za državljane drugih republik, ki niso pridobili državljanstva Republike Slovenije, ne bi smeli uporabljati.
Neither should the competent authorities have transferred these persons from the existing Register of Permanent Residents to the Register of Aliens ex proprio motu, without any decision or notification being addressed to the persons concerned.
Prav tako ne bi smeli pristojni organi opraviti prenosa teh oseb iz obstoječega registra stalnega prebivalstva v evidenco tujcev iz lastnega nagiba (ex proprio motu) brez vsake odločbe ali obvestila prizadeti osebi.
There was no statutory basis whatsoever for them to take such action.
Za tako ravnanje niso imeli zakonske podlage.
The Inhabitants&apos; Evidence of Residence and Population Registry Act, which is invoked by the Government in its explanations, does not contain any provisions on the removal of permanent residents from the Register on the basis of the Act itself.
Zakon o evidenci nastanitve občanov in o registru prebivalstva, na katerega se sklicuje vlada v svojih pojasnilih, ne pozna izbrisa stalnega prebivališča na podlagi samega zakona.
Neither is the Government empowered by statute to adopt individual decisions determining the manner in which statutory provisions are to be implemented.
Prav tako vlada nima zakonskega pooblastila, da s sklepom kot posamičnim aktom določi način izvajanja zakonskih določb.
On the basis of Article 120 of the Constitution, duties and functions associated with public administration are to be conducted independently and at all times pursuant to, and in a manner consistent with, the Constitution and the law.
Na podlagi 120. člena ustave upravni organi opravljajo svoje delo samostojno v okviru in na podlagi ustave in zakonov.
When the Government found that the Aliens Act could not also be applied in practice to citizens of other republics, it should have proposed that the legislature regulate their legal position, and should not have interfered with the legislative power by adopting a decision.
Ko je vlada ugotovila, da ZTuj v praksi ni mogoče uporabiti tudi za državljane drugih republik, bi morala zakonodajalcu predlagati ureditev njihovega pravnega statusa, ne pa s sklepom poseči v zakonodajno pristojnost.
For the foregoing reasons, the Aliens Act, whose transitional provisions do not regulate the legal status of citizens of other republics who had permanent residence in the Republic of Slovenia and were actually resident in its territory, has violated the principles of a law-governed State under Article 2 of the Constitution.
Iz navedenih razlogov so bila z ZTuj, ki v prehodnih določbah ne ureja pravnega statusa državljanov drugih republik kot tujcev v Republiki Sloveniji, ki so imeli v Republiki Sloveniji stalno prebivališče in so na njenem ozemlju tudi dejansko živeli, kršena načela pravne države iz 2. člena ustave.
For this reason, the citizens of other republics, upon the expiry of the time-limits set in subsection 2 of section 81, found themselves in an insecure legal position.
Zato so se državljani drugih republik s potekom rokov, določenih v drugem odstavku 81. a, znašli v negotovem pravnem položaju.
From the text of the transitional provisions, which specify that the provisions of the Aliens Act are to be applied, the said persons could not have grasped what their position would be as foreigners and which statutory provisions should apply to them.
Iz besedila prehodne določbe, ki napotuje na uporabo določb ZTuj, te osebe niso mogle razbrati, kakšen položaj naj bi imele kot tujci in katere določbe zakona naj zanje veljajo.
Accordingly, the Constitutional Court concludes that, because the legal position of citizens of other republics as foreigners has not been regulated in the Republic of Slovenia, the principle of legal certainty as one of the principles of a law-governed State has been violated.
Zato ustavno sodišče ugotavlja, da je bilo zaradi neurejenega pravnega položaja državljanov drugih republik kot tujcev v Republiki Sloveniji kršeno načelo varstva zaupanja v pravo, ki je eno izmed načel pravne države.
The principle of legal certainty guarantees to the individual that the State will not make his or her legal position worse without justified reasons.
Načelo varstva zaupanja v pravo posamezniku zagotavlja, da mu država njegovega pravnega položaja ne bo poslabšala brez utemeljenega razloga.
It was quite justified that citizens of other republics who did not opt for Slovenian citizenship should not expect that they would be made equal to foreigners who had only just come into the Republic of Slovenia and that they would be deprived of permanent residence, without, moreover, being given any notice whatsoever.
Državljani drugih republik, ki se niso odločili za slovensko državljanstvo, povsem upravičeno niso mogli pričakovati, da bodo izenačeni s tujci, ki šele prihajajo v Republiko Slovenijo, in da bodo izgubili stalno prebivališče, in še to brez vsakršnega obvestila.&quot;
215...The relevant parts of the Constitutional Court&apos;s decision of 3 April 2003 (see paragraphs 58-60 above) read as follows:
Ustrezni deli odločbe ustavnega sodišča z dne 3. aprila 2003 (glej 58.?60. odstavek) določajo:
&quot;At a session held on 3 April 2003 in the proceedings to examine petitions and in the proceedings to review constitutionality commenced upon petitions by the Association of the Erased of Slovenia, Ptuj, and others, represented by M.K. ... and N.M.P. ... , the Constitutional Court decided as follows:
&quot;Ustavno sodišče je v postopku za preizkus pobud in v postopku za presojo ustavnosti, začetem na pobude Društva izbrisanih prebivalcev Slovenije, Ptuj, in drugih, ki jih zastopata M. K. in N. M. P. iz Ljubljane, na seji 3. aprila 2003 odločilo:
The Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in the Republic of Slovenia (Official Gazette RS, Nos..61/99 and 64/01) is inconsistent with the Constitution, as it does not recognise citizens of other republics of the former SFRY who were removed from the Register of Permanent Residents on 26 February 1992 as having permanent residence from the aforementioned date.
Zakon o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji (Uradni list RS, št. 61/99 in 64/01) je v neskladju z Ustavo, ker državljanom drugih republik nekdanje SFRJ, ki so bili 26. 2. 1992 izbrisani iz registra stalnega prebivalstva, od navedenega dne ne priznava stalnega prebivanja.
The Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in the Republic of Slovenia is inconsistent with the Constitution, as it does not regulate the acquisition of a permit for permanent residence by citizens of other republics of the former SFRY as referred to in the previous paragraph whose forcible removal as a foreigner was ordered under section.28 of the Aliens Act (Official Gazette RS, No. 1/91-1 and 44/97).
Zakon o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji je v neskladju z ustavo, ker ne ureja pridobitve dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje državljanov drugih republik nekdanje SFRJ iz prejšnjega odstavka izreka, ki jim je bil izrečen ukrep prisilne odstranitve tujca iz 28. člena Zakona o tujcih (Uradni list RS, št. 1/91-I in 44/97).
Section 1 of the Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in the Republic of Slovenia is inconsistent with the Constitution for the reasons mentioned in the reasoning of this decision.
1. člen Zakona o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji je v neskladju z ustavo iz razlogov, navedenih v obrazložitvi te odločbe.
Subsections 1 and 2 of section 2 of the Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in the Republic of Slovenia are abrogated in the parts in which they determine a time-limit of three months for submitting an application for the issuance of a permit for permanent residence.
Prvi in drugi odstavek 2. člena Zakona o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji se v delih, v katerih določata rok treh mesecev za vložitev prošnje za izdajo dovoljenja za stalno prebivanje, razveljavita.
The legislature is obliged to remedy the unconstitutionalities established in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the operative provisions within six months from the date of the publication of this decision in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.
Ugotovljene neskladnosti iz prvega, drugega in tretjega odstavka izreka mora zakonodajalec odpraviti v šestih mesecih od dneva objave te odločbe v Uradnem listu Republike Slovenije.
The permanent residence status of citizens of other republics of the former SFRY is hereby established from 26 February 1992 onwards if they were removed on that day from the Register of Permanent Residents, by means of a permit for permanent residence issued on the basis of the Act on Regularisation of the Legal Status of Citizens of Other Successor States to the Former SFRY in the Republic of Slovenia, the Aliens Act (Official Gazette RS, Nos 1/91-1 and 44/97), or the Aliens Act (Official Gazette RS, No. 61/99).
Z dovoljenjem za stalno prebivanje, izdanim na podlagi Zakona o urejanju statusa državljanov drugih držav naslednic nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji ali na podlagi Zakona o tujcih (Uradni list RS, št. 1/91-I in 44/97) ali na podlagi Zakona o tujcih (Uradni list RS, št. 61/99) se ugotavlja stalno prebivanje državljanov drugih republik nekdanje SFRJ v Republiki Sloveniji od 26. 2. 1992 dalje, če so bili tega dne izbrisani iz registra stalnega prebivalstva.
The Ministry of the Interior must as an official duty issue supplementary decisions on the establishment of their permanent residence in the Republic of Slovenia from 26 February 1992 onwards.
Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve jim mora po uradni dolžnosti izdati dopolnilne odločbe o ugotovitvi njihovega stalnega prebivanja v Republiki Sloveniji od 26. 2. 1992 dalje.
As the challenged Act does not enable citizens of other republics to acquire permanent resident status from the day when it was not formally recognised in their case [that is, when such status was taken away], and thus only partially remedies the established unconstitutionality, it is inconsistent with the Constitution.
Ker izpodbijani zakon državljanom drugih republik ne omogoča pridobitve stalnega prebivanja od dneva, ko jim formalnopravno ni bilo priznano, ter tako odpravlja ugotovljeno protiustavnost le delno, je v neskladju z ustavo.
The principle of legal certainty as one of the principles of a State governed by the rule of law under Article 2 of the Constitution requires that the position of the persons concerned should not remain unregulated for any period of time.
Načelo pravne varnosti kot eno od načel pravne države iz 2. člena ustave zahteva, da položaj navedenih oseb ne ostane v določenem obdobju pravno neurejen.
Permanent resident status is an important linking aspect for claiming certain rights and legal benefits which the persons concerned could not claim owing to the legally unregulated state of affairs.
Stalno prebivališče je pomembna navezna okoliščina za uveljavljanje določenih pravic in pravnih koristi, ki jih navedene osebe niso mogle uveljavljati zaradi pravno neurejenega stanja.
Their position in the Republic of Slovenia was legally uncertain owing to the unregulated state of affairs, as by acquiring the status of foreigner they lost their permanent resident status in the territory of the Republic of Slovenia and found themselves in an unregulated position or in an essentially worsened legal position (for example, that of having temporary resident status), which has lasted, in the case of some of the adversely affected persons, for as much as ten years.
Njihov položaj v Republiki Sloveniji je bil zaradi neurejenega stanja pravno negotov, saj so s pridobitvijo položaja tujca izgubili stalno prebivališče na območju Republike Slovenije in se znašli v neurejenem položaju ali v bistveno slabšem pravnem položaju (npr. začasno prebivališče), ki je za nekatere od prizadetih oseb trajal tudi do deset let.
From the recommendation that the National Assembly made in the light of the 7th annual report of the Human Rights Ombudsman for the year 2001 (Official Gazette RS, No 2/03), it follows that the issue of the legal position of such citizens of other republics still calls for legal regulation.
Da pravni položaj državljanov drugih republik še vedno ni pravno urejen, je razvidno iz priporočila, ki ga je Državni zbor sprejel ob obravnavi sedmega letnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2001 (Uradni list RS, št.
On account of the fact that their permanent resident status was not recognised from the day when their legal status was, following the gaining of independence by the Republic of Slovenia, changed to the [different] status of a foreigner, citizens of other republics were not able to assert certain rights that they would have otherwise been entitled to as foreigners permanently residing in the Republic of Slovenia.
Državljani drugih republik zaradi nepriznanja stalnega prebivanja od dneva, ko se je zaradi osamosvojitve Republike Slovenije spremenil njihov pravni status v status tujca, niso mogli uveljaviti pravic, ki bi jim pripadale kot tujcem s stalnim prebivanjem v Republiki Sloveniji.
The petitioners did not explicitly define these rights; however, from the decisions of the Constitutional Court it follows that these concerned, in particular, the right to the advance payment of a military pension, the right to social-security benefits and the ability to change one&apos;s driving licence.
Pobudniki jih izrecno ne opredeljujejo, iz odločb ustavnega sodišča pa izhaja, da je šlo predvsem za pravice do akontacije vojaške pokojnine, pravice do varstvenega dodatka in za nemožnost zamenjave vozniškega dovoljenj.
The Arbitration Commission of the Conference on Yugoslavia (commonly known as the Badinter Arbitration Commission, chaired by Mr.Robert Badinter) was a commission set up by the Council of Ministers of the European Economic Community on 27 August 1991 to provide the Conference on Yugoslavia with legal advice.
Arbitražno komisijo konference o Jugoslaviji (splošno znana kot Badinterjeva arbitražna komisija, ki ji je predsedoval Robert Badinter) je ustanovil Svet ministrov Evropske gospodarske skupnosti 27. 8. 1991 za pravno svetovanje konferenci o Jugoslaviji.
The Badinter Arbitration Commission handed down fifteen opinions on &quot;major legal questions&quot; arising from the dissolution of the SFRY.
Badinterjeva arbitražna komisija je izdala petnajst strokovnih mnenj o &quot;glavnih pravnih vprašanjih&quot; v zvezi z razpadom SFRJ.
In its Opinion No. 9, the Commission considered how the problems of State succession resulting from the dissolution of the SFRY should be resolved.
Komisija je v strokovnem mnenju št. 9 obravnavala način razrešitve vprašanj nasledstva držav, ki so nastala po razpadu SFRJ.
It ruled that they should be resolved by mutual agreement between the various successor States.
Odločila je, da jih je treba rešiti z medsebojnimi dogovori različnih držav naslednic.
The principal Council of Europe instrument concerning citizenship is the European Convention on Nationality, which was adopted on 6.November 1997 and entered into force on 1 March 2000. Slovenia has not signed this convention, the relevant part of which reads:
Temeljni dokument Sveta Evrope v zvezi z državljanstvom je Evropska konvencija o državljanstvu, ki je bila sprejeta 6. novembra 1997 in je začela veljati 1. marca 2000. Slovenija je ni podpisala.
In matters of nationality in cases of State succession, each State Party concerned shall respect the principles of the rule of law, the rules concerning human rights and the principles contained in ... this Convention ..., in particular in order to avoid statelessness.
Pri zadevah z državljanstvom ob nasledstvu držav bodo države pogodbenice spo?tovale na?ela vladavine prava, pravila v zvezi s ?lovekovimi pravicami in na?eli, vsebovanimi v ... tej konvenciji ..., zlasti zato, da se prepreči brezdržavljanstvo.
In deciding on the granting or the retention of nationality in cases of State succession, each State Party concerned shall take account in particular of:
Pri odločanju o dodelitvi ali odvzemu državljanstva ob nasledstvu držav bo vsaka država pogodbenica upoštevala zlasti:
(a) the genuine and effective link of the person concerned with the State;
(a) pristne in dejanske vezi obravnavane osebe z državo;
(b) the habitual residence of the person concerned at the time of State succession;
(b) običajno prebivališče osebe ob nasledstvu držav;
(c) the will of the person concerned;
(c) voljo osebe;
(d) the territorial origin of the person concerned.
(d) krajevni izvor osebe.
On 19 May 2006 the Council of Europe adopted the Convention on the Avoidance of Statelessness in relation to State Succession.
maja 2006 je Svet Evrope sprejel Konvencijo o preprečevanju brezdržavljanstva v zvezi z nasledstvom držav.
This convention entered into force on 1 May 2009. Slovenia has not signed it.
Ta konvencija je začela veljati 1. maja 2009. Slovenija te konvencije ni podpisala.
¶ Article 5 A successor State shall grant its nationality to persons who, at the time of the State succession, had the nationality of the predecessor State, and who have or would become stateless as a result of the State succession if at that time:
Država naslednica bo svoje državljanstvo podelila osebam, ki so ob nasledstvu držav imele državljanstvo države predhodnice in so oziroma bi ostale brez državljanstva kot posledica nasledstva držav v tistem času:
(a) they were habitually resident in the territory which has become territory of the successor State, or
(a) so običajno prebivale na ozemlju, ki je postalo ozemlje države naslednice ali
(b) they were not habitually resident in any State concerned but had an appropriate connection with the successor State.
(b) niso običajno prebivale v nobeni od teh držav, vendar so bile ustrezno povezane z državo naslednico.
For the purpose of paragraph 1, sub-paragraph b, an appropriate connection includes inter alia:
Za pododstavek b prvega odstavka ustrezne povezave vključujejo med drugim:
(a) a legal bond to a territorial unit of a predecessor State which has become territory of the successor State;
(a) pravno zavezo teritorialni enoti države predhodnice, ki je postalo ozemlje države naslednice;
(b) birth on the territory which has become territory of the successor State;
(b) rojstvo na ozemlju, ki je postalo ozemlje države naslednice;
(c) last habitual residence on the territory of the predecessor State which has become territory of the successor State.&quot;
(c) zadnje običajno prebivališče na ozemlju države predhodnice, ki je postalo ozemlje države naslednice.&quot;
Article 11 &quot;States concerned shall take all necessary steps to ensure that persons concerned have sufficient information about rules and procedures with regard to the acquisition of their nationality.&quot;
&quot;Države bodo sprejele potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi, da imajo osebe dovolj informacij o pravilih in postopkih v zvezi s pridobitvijo njihovega državljanstva.&quot;
(b) The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities On 26 May 2005 the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities adopted its second opinion concerning Slovenia and expressed concern about the problematic situation of the &quot;erased&quot;.
maja 2005 je svetovalni odbor za Okvirno konvencijo za zaščito narodnih manjšin sprejel svoje drugo mnenje v zvezi s Slovenijo in izrazil svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi težavnega položaja izbrisanih.
On 1 December 2005 the Government filed their written comments (see the relevant part of the report in Kuriæ and Others v..Slovenia, no. 26828/06, § 262, 13 July 2010 - hereinafter referred to as &quot;the Chamber judgment&quot;).
decembra 2005 je vlada predložila svoje pisne pripombe (glej ustrezni del poročila Kurić in drugi proti Sloveniji, št. odstavek, 13. julij 2010 - v nadaljnjem besedilu: &quot;sodba senata&quot;).
On 14 June 2006 the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted Resolution ResCMN(2006)6 on the implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities by Slovenia.
junija 2006 je Odbor ministrov Sveta Evrope sprejel sklep ResCMN (2006) 6 o izvajanju Okvirne konvencije za varstvo narodnih manjšin v Sloveniji.
It noted as an issue of concern the situation of the &quot;erased&quot;.
Ugotovil je, da položaj izbrisanih vzbuja skrb.
The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights has addressed the issue of the &quot;erased&quot; on a number of occasions and addressed recommendations to the Government in order to remedy the situation (see the relevant extracts of the Commissioner&apos;s reports in paragraphs 264-265 of the Chamber judgment).
Komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice je večkrat obravnaval vprašanje izbrisanih in priporočil vladi, naj popravi položaj (glej ustrezne izvlečke iz komisarjevih poročil v 264.-265. odstavku sodbe senata).
Further to his visits, during which he discussed the issue of the &quot;erased&quot; with the Slovenian authorities, he sent letters to the Prime Minister in office.
Po svojih obiskih, na katerih se je pogovarjal o izbrisanih s slovenskimi organi, je pošiljal pisma tedanjemu predsedniku vlade.
In his letter of 10 May 2011 he expressed appreciation of the Government&apos;s determination to find a solution for &quot;the erased&quot;.
V svojem pismu je 10. maja 2011 izrazil zadovoljstvo ob odločenosti vlade, da poišče rešitev za izbrisane.
He welcomed the enactment of the amended Legal Status Act.
Pozdravil je uveljavitev spremenjenega in dopolnjenega ZUSDDD.
He nevertheless expressed concern that the law did not fully remedy the negative impact of the &quot;erasure&quot;.
Kljub temu je izrazil zaskrbljenost, da zakon ni popolnoma odpravil negativnega učinka izbrisa.
Only 127 of the &quot;erased&quot; had submitted requests under the new law at that time and thirty-two of them had been rejected.
Samo 127 izbrisanih je tedaj vložilo prošnje na podlagi novega zakona, od katerih je bilo 32 zavrnjenih.
The fulfilment of the condition of actual residence for those who had left Slovenia for longer than ten years continued to be a problem in his view.
Po njegovem mnenju je bila izpolnitev pogoja dejanskega prebivanja za tiste, ki so zapustili Slovenijo za več kot deset let, še naprej vprašljiva.
He was also concerned by the non-existence of any reparation mechanism at the domestic level that would provide redress to the &quot;erased&quot;.
Zaskrbljen je bil tudi, ker ni bilo nikakršnega načina za povrnitev škode izbrisanim na državni ravni.