natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ensure that non-national EU citizens can found or become members of political parties in the host Member State, the Commission continued its infringement proceedings against seven Member States which did not allow this.
Za zagotovitev, da lahko državljani Unije, ki prebivajo v državi, ki ni država, katere državljanstvo imajo, ustanovijo politične stranke v državi članici gostiteljici ali postanejo njihovi člani, je Komisija nadaljevala postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev proti sedmim državam članicam, v katerih to ni bilo dovoljeno.
In 2015 the Council adopted a Directive to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented EU citizens abroad which establishes clear and legally binding rules on cooperation and coordination between Member States' consular authorities to ensure that unrepresented EU citizens in third countries can benefit from non-discriminatory consular protection from other Member States.
Svet je leta 2015 sprejel direktivo za lažje zagotavljanje konzularne zaščite državljanom Unije brez predstavništva v tujini, v kateri so določena jasna in pravno zavezujoča pravila o sodelovanju in usklajevanju med konzularnimi organi držav članic, da lahko državljani Unije brez predstavništva v tretjih državah izkoristijo nediskriminatorno konzularno zaščito drugih držav članic.
The Commission also continued its work with Member State experts in its group of experts on the right to free movement of persons, to identify difficulties and clarify issues of interpretation of EU law on free movement of EU citizens, as well as to share information on abuse and fraud and exchange best practices.
Komisija je še naprej sodelovala s strokovnjaki držav članic v strokovni skupini za pravico do prostega gibanja oseb, da bi odkrila težave in pojasnila vprašanja v zvezi z razlago prava EU o prostem gibanju državljanov Unije ter si izmenjala informacije o zlorabi in goljufijah ter dobre prakse.
In 2014 the Commission adopted a Communication, Helping national authorities fight abuses of the right to free movement, and a Handbook on addressing the issue of alleged marriages of convenience between EU citizens and non-EU nationals in the context of EU law on free movement of EU citizens, the main purpose of which was to help national authorities to combat potential abuse of the right to free movement.
Komisija je leta 2014 sprejela sporočilo z naslovom Pomagati nacionalnim organom v boju proti zlorabam pravice do prostega gibanja: Priročnik o reševanju problematike domnevnih navideznih sklenitev zakonske zveze med državljani EU in državljani tretjih držav v okviru prava EU o prostem gibanju državljanov EU, katerega glavni namen je pomagati nacionalnim organom v boju proti morebitnim zlorabam pravice do prostega gibanja.
In the reporting period, the Commission replied to four complaints, ten letters/individual queries and three questions from the European Parliament on this issue.
V obdobju poročanja je Komisija odgovorila na štiri pritožbe, deset dopisov/individualnih poizvedb in tri vprašanja Evropskega parlamenta o teh zadevah.
[44: Evaluation of EU rules on free movement of EU citizens and their family members and their practical implementation (October 2013) http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/evaluation_of_eu_rules_on_free_movement-final_report.pdf Evaluation of the impact of the free movement of EU citizens at local level (January 2014) http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/dg_just_eva_free_mov_final_report_27.01.14.pdf ][45: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/events/intra-eu-mobility-2014/ ]
[44: Evaluation of EU rules on free movement of EU citizens and their family members and their practical implementation (Ocena pravil EU o prostem gibanju državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov ter njihovo praktično izvajanje, oktober 2013), dostopna na http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/evaluation_of_eu_rules_on_free_movement-final_report.pdf, in Evaluation of the impact of the free movement of EU citizens at local level (Ocena učinka prostega gibanja državljanov EU na lokalni ravni, januar 2014), dostopna na http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/files/dg_just_eva_free_mov_final_report_27.01.14.pdf.
Citizens living in these 16 Member States can choose that the law applicable to their divorce or legal separation should be the law of the country where they habitually reside or where they last habitually resided, or the country of nationality of either spouse or of the country where divorce or legal separation proceedings are being handled.
Državljani, ki prebivajo v teh 16 državah članicah, lahko izberejo, da se za njihovo razvezo zakonske zveze ali prenehanje življenjske skupnosti uporablja pravo države, v kateri imajo običajno prebivališče ali v kateri so imeli zadnje običajno prebivališče, ali države, katere državljanstvo ima zakonec, ali države, v kateri poteka razvezni postopek ali postopek za prenehanje življenjske skupnosti.
Citizenship of the Union (Article 20(1) TFEU)
Državljanstvo Unije (člen 20(1) PDEU)
[40: Case C-438/14 Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff. ]
[40: Zadeva C-438/14, Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff.]
The Regulation determines the Member State responsible for dealing with the succession, the applicable national law, enforcement and proof across the European Union through the European Certificate of Succession.
Uredba določa, katera država članica je odgovorna za obravnavo dedovanja, veljavno nacionalno pravo, izvrševanje in dokazovanje v Evropski uniji z evropskim potrdilom o dedovanju.
Several bilateral agreements were negotiated between the EU and third countries containing consular consent clauses to give full effect to the right of unrepresented EU citizens to non-discriminatory consular protection.
Po pogajanjih je bilo sprejetih več dvostranskih sporazumov med EU in tretjimi državami, ki vsebujejo klavzule o soglašanju s konzularno zaščito, da se v celoti zagotovi izvrševanje pravice državljanov Unije brez predstavništva do nediskriminatorne konzularne zaščite.
[84: Inter alia with Afghanistan, Australia, Canada, Cuba and New Zealand. ]
[84: Med drugim z Afganistanom, Avstralijo, Kanado, Kubo in Novo Zelandijo.]
[19: Case C-135/08 Rottmann. ]
[19: Zadeva C-135/08, Rottmann.]
The Commission replied to 32 complaints, 71 letters/individual queries, 58 questions and 13 petitions from the European Parliament on these issues, primarily relating to ‘disenfranchisement' and to the electoral rights of disabled persons.
Komisija je odgovorila na 32 pritožb, 71 dopisov/individualnih poizvedb, 58 vprašanj in 13 peticij Evropskega parlamenta o teh vprašanjih, ki so se večinoma nanašala na „odvzem volilne pravice" in na volilne pravice invalidov.
Case-law developments
Razvoj sodne prakse
The Commission also published an updated Practice Guide for citizens and legal practitioners on the application of this Regulation, which determines what Member State courts should deal with a divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment and with matters of parental responsibility such as custody, access rights and child abduction, in cross-border circumstances.
Komisija je objavila tudi posodobljeni praktični vodnik za državljane in delavce v pravni stroki o uporabi te uredbe, v katerem je določeno, katera sodišča držav članic bi morala v čezmejnih primerih obravnavati razvezo zakonske zveze, prenehanje življenjske skupnosti ali razveljavitev zakonske zveze in spore v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo, povezane na primer s pravico do varstva in vzgoje, pravico do stikov in odvzemom otroka.
[27: Case C-140/12 Brey.
[27: Zadeva C-140/12, Brey.
In Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff the Court found that the refusal by the German authorities to recognise freely chosen forenames and surname legally acquired in the UK by a dual German-UK national but which include several tokens of nobility, constitutes a restriction on the freedom to move and reside across the EU.
Sodišče je v zadevi Bogendorff von Wolffersdorff, v kateri nemški organi niso želeli priznati imena in priimka državljana z dvojnim nemškim in britanskim državljanstvom, ki si ju je sam izbral in pravno pridobil v Združenem kraljestvu ter ki vsebujeta več plemiških nazivov, razsodilo, da je to omejitev prostega gibanja in prebivanja znotraj EU.
][56: Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Portugal, Romania and Slovenia.
][56: Belgija, Bolgarija, Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Italija, Latvija, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Avstrija, Portugalska, Romunija in Slovenija.
In January 2014 the Commission adopted a Recommendation on addressing the consequences of disenfranchisement of Union citizens exercising their rights to free movement.
Komisija je januarja 2014 sprejela priporočilo z naslovom Obravnavanje posledic izgube volilne pravice državljanov Unije, ki uresničujejo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja.
Articles 20(2)(d) and 24(2), (3) and (4) TFEU refer to other rights entitling EU citizens to address the EU institutions, including the right to petition the European Parliament and the right to address the European Ombudsman.
Člen 20(2)(d) ter člen 24(2), (3) in (4) PDEU se nanašata na druge pravice, v skladu s katerimi se lahko državljani Unije obrnejo na institucije EU, vključno s pravico, da na Evropski parlament naslovijo peticijo, in pravico, da se obrnejo na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Making the exercise of free movement rights more effective for workers
Povečevanje učinkovitosti uveljavljanja pravic do prostega gibanja delavcev
Under Article 24(2) TFEU, EU citizens have the right to petition the European Parliament, in any Treaty language, on Union matters that affect them and to obtain a reply in the same language.
V skladu s členom 24(2) PDEU imajo državljani Unije pravico, da na Evropski parlament v katerem koli jeziku iz Pogodbe naslovijo peticijo o vprašanjih Unije, ki jih zadevajo, in prejmejo odgovor v istem jeziku.
][81: Czech Republic, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.]
][81: Češka, Latvija, Litva in Poljska.]
It ruled that in the case in question the withholding of civic rights was proportionate, considering the seriousness of the person's crime and the fact that French law allows citizens to apply for reinstatement of their voting rights, and thus permitted.
V zadevni zadevi je razsodilo, da je bil odvzem državljanske pravice sorazmerno dejanje zaradi resnosti kaznivega dejanja in dejstva, da lahko v skladu s francoskim pravom državljani zaprosijo za ponovno podelitev volilnih pravic, zato je bil v tem primeru odvzem dovoljen.
5.2.1 Access to benefits and/or social assistance by economically inactive EU citizens
5.2.1 Dostop ekonomsko neaktivnih državljanov Unije do socialnih prejemkov in/ali socialne pomoči
Many concerned the right of entry and residence of non-EU family members of EU citizens (conditions for issuing visas and residence cards, additional formalities) and the conditions under which EU citizens can exercise their right to free movement.
Mnogi so se nanašali na pravico do vstopa in prebivanja državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije (na pogoje za izdajo vizumov in dovoljenj za prebivanje ter druge formalnosti), ter pogoje, pod katerimi lahko državljani Unije uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja.
5.2.5 Residence of former family members of EU citizens
5.2.5 Prebivanje nekdanjih družinskih članov državljanov Unije
In Delvigne the Court was asked to examine whether it was contrary to European law for a French citizen who had been convicted of a serious crime to be permanently deprived of his right to vote in European elections.
Sodišče je moralo v zadevi Delvigne proučiti, ali je v nasprotju s pravom EU, da se francoskemu državljanu, obsojenemu zaradi hudega kaznivega dejanja, trajno odvzame pravica, da voli na volitvah v Evropski parlament.
[6: Case C-322/13 Grauel Rüffer.
[6: Zadeva C-322/13, Grauel Rüffer.
Article 20 TFEU provides that any person who holds the nationality of an EU country is also a citizen of the Union.
V skladu s členom 20 PDEU so vse osebe z državljanstvom ene od držav članic EU tudi državljani Unije.
Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality (Article 18 TFEU)
Prepoved diskriminacije glede na državljanstvo (člen 18 PDEU)
The Court further clarified the conditions under which non-EU family members of EU citizens may enjoy a derived right of residence in the citizens' Member States of nationality when the citizens return with their family member after having genuinely and effectively exercised their right to free movement.
Sodišče je dodatno pojasnilo pogoje, v skladu s katerimi lahko državljani tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, uveljavljajo izvedeno pravico do prebivanja v državah članicah, katerih državljanstvo imajo državljani Unije, ko se državljani vrnejo z družinskim članom, potem ko so resnično in učinkovito uveljavljali pravico do prostega gibanja.
[29: Case C-333/13 Dano, see paragraphs 78-79.]
[29: Zadeva C-333/13, Dano, glej točki 78 in 79.]
[35: Case C-457/12 S and G.]
[35: Zadeva C-457/12, S in G.]
Against this background, the Commission looked into national ‘investor schemes' granting citizenship rights to non-EU nationals in return for investment.
Zato je Komisija proučila nacionalne „sheme za vlagatelje", s katerimi se državljanske pravice podelijo državljanom tretjih držav v zameno za naložbe.
In Dano the Court reviewed the case of an economically inactive EU citizen who did not fulfil the conditions set out in the Free Movement Directive (having sufficient resources) to claim a right of residence upon arriving in the territory of the host Member State.
Sodišče je v zadevi Dano pregledalo primer ekonomsko neaktivnega državljana Unije, ki ni izpolnjeval pogojev iz direktive o prostem gibanju (o zadostnih sredstvih), da bi lahko uveljavljal pravico do prebivanja ob prihodu na ozemlje države članice gostiteljice.
[33: Case C-202/13 McCarthy.
[33: Zadeva C-202/13, McCarthy.
In the reporting period, the Commission dealt with 613 complaints from citizens, 309 letters/individual queries, 75 questions and 46 petitions from the European Parliament on the exercise of the right to free movement.
V obdobju poročanja je Komisija obravnavala 613 pritožb državljanov, 309 dopisov/individualnih poizvedb, 75 vprašanj in 46 peticij Evropskega parlamenta o uveljavljanju pravice do prostega gibanja.
[7: See also Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.]
[7: Glej tudi člen 21(1) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.]
[71: Case C-650/13 Delvigne.
[71: Zadeva C-650/13, Delvigne.
The Court clarified specific aspects of the right of residence of non-EU nationals who are family members of Union citizens in the host Member State.
Sodišče je pojasnilo posebne vidike pravice državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, do prebivanja v državi članici gostiteljici.
][23: 71% of respondents to the Flash Eurobarometer 430 on EU citizenship, October 2015. ]
][23: Mnenje 71 % vprašanih na raziskavo Flash Eurobarometer 430 o državljanstvu EU, oktober 2015.]
In Singh an EU citizen left the host Member State before commencing divorce proceedings, while the non-EU national spouse stayed behind.
V zadevi Singh je državljanka Unije zapustila državo članico gostiteljico pred začetkom razveznega postopka, zakonec, ki je bil državljan tretje države, pa je ostal v državi članici gostiteljici.
][49: Belgium, Germany, Poland, Sweden and the UK.]
][49: Belgija, Nemčija, Poljska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo.]
Under Articles 20(2)(a) and 21 TFEU, Union citizens are entitled to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and measures adopted to give them effect.
V skladu s členom 20(2)(a) in členom 21 PDEU imajo državljani Unije pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ob upoštevanju omejitev in pogojev, določenih s Pogodbama in ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti za njuno uveljavitev.
[38: Case C-218/14 Singh.
[38: Zadeva C-218/14, Singh.
The main issues raised in the proceedings concern the rights of entry and residence for non-EU family members of Union citizens, including same-sex spouses or partners, in particular the conditions for issuing visas and residence cards to non-EU family members, and the material and procedural safeguards against the expulsion of EU citizens.
Glavna vprašanja, izpostavljena v postopkih, so se nanašala na pravico do vstopa in prebivanja državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, vključno z istospolnimi zakonci ali partnerji, zlasti na pogoje za izdajo vizumov ali dovoljenj za prebivanje državljanom tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, ter materialna in postopkovna jamstva za preprečevanje izgona državljanov Unije.
The Commission intervened in one Member State, which had granted citizenship to investors in return for investment alone.
Komisija je posredovala v eni državi članici, v kateri se je vlagateljem državljanstvo podelilo že zgolj v zameno za naložbo.
The Court also ruled on cases of divorce between an EU citizen and a non-EU national who had been residing in a Member State.
Sodišče je razsodilo tudi o primerih razveze zakonske zveze državljana Unije in državljana tretje države, ki je prebival v državi članici.
][72: Case C-300/04 Eman and Sevinge.]
][72: Zadeva C-300/04, Eman in Sevinger.]
In S and G the Court ruled that EU citizens who reside in the Member State of their nationality but commute regularly for work reasons to another Member State fall within the scope of Article 45 TFEU and thus exercise their right to free movement as workers.
Sodišče je v zadevi S in G razsodilo, da državljani Unije, ki prebivajo v državi članici, katere državljanstvo imajo, vendar redno potujejo v drugo državo članico iz delovnih razlogov, spadajo na področje uporabe člena 45 PDEU in s tem kot delavci uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja.
Right to protection by diplomatic or consular authorities (Articles 20(2)(c) and 23 TFEU)
Pravica do zaščite diplomatskih ali konzularnih organov (člen 20(2)(c) in člen 23 PDEU)
[30: Case C-67/14 Alimanovic.]
[30: Zadeva C-67/14, Alimanovic.]
The Court ruled that the latter retains a right of residence only where this existed at the time the divorce proceedings were launched.
Sodišče je razsodilo, da državljan tretje države ohrani pravico do prebivanja le, če jo je imel ob začetku razveznega postopka.
[31: Case C-299/14 García-Nieto and Others.]
[31: Zadeva C-299/14, García-Nieto in drugi.]
The Court held that national legislation which precludes granting special non-contributory cash benefits constituting social assistance benefits to nationals of other Member States in that situation complies with EU law.
Menilo je, da je v tem primeru nacionalna zakonodaja, ki nasprotuje dodelitvi posebnih denarnih dajatev, za katere se ne plačujejo prispevki in ki sestavljajo dajatve socialne pomoči, državljanom drugih držav članic, skladna s pravom EU.
The Court ruled in Brey that EU law does not preclude national legislation from making the grant of social assistance benefits to an economically inactive EU citizen subject to meeting the conditions for enjoying a right of residence in the host Member State set out in the Free Movement Directive.
Sodišče je v zadevi Brey razsodilo, da pravo EU ne nasprotuje nacionalni zakonodaji, da se ekonomsko neaktivnemu državljanu Unije dodelijo dajatve socialne pomoči, če izpolnjuje pogoje za pridobitev pravice do prebivanja v državi članici gostiteljici, določene v direktivi o prostem gibanju.
A non-EU family member derives a right of residence in the home Member State of an EU citizen who is resident in that Member State but regularly travels to another Member State to work, if refusal to grant such a right would discourage the commuting EU citizen from effectively exercising his right to free movement as a worker.
Družinski član, ki je državljan tretje države, pridobi izvedeno pravico do prebivanja v matični državi članici državljana Unije, ki je rezident navedene države članice, vendar zaradi dela redno potuje v drugo državo članico, če bi zavrnitev podelitve take pravice potujočega državljana Unije odvrnila od tega, da bi kot delavec učinkovito uveljavljal svojo pravico do prostega gibanja.
In the reporting period, the Commission dealt with 14 complaints, 56 letters/individual queries, 23 questions and 7 petitions from the European Parliament in this area, mainly related to information on how to obtain Member State nationality and the nature of EU citizenship.
V obdobju poročanja je Komisija obravnavala 14 pritožb, 56 dopisov/individualnih poizvedb, 23 vprašanj in 7 peticij Evropskega parlamenta s tega področja, zlasti glede informacij o načinih pridobitve državljanstva države članice in naravi državljanstva Unije.
[11: COM(2015) 190 final. ][12: Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, OJ L 373, 21.12.2004, pp.
[11: COM(2015) 190 final.][12: Direktiva 2004/113/ES z dne 13. decembra 2004 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk pri dostopu do blaga in storitev ter oskrbi z njimi (UL L 373, 21.12.2004, str.
In O and B the Court ruled that where citizens exercise their right to free movement under Article 21 TFEU, their ‘genuine residence' in the host Member State creates on their return a derived right of residence (on the basis of Article 21 TFEU) for the non-EU national with whom they lived as a family member.
Sodišče je v zadevi O in B razsodilo, da se v primerih, ko državljani uveljavljajo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja v skladu s členom 21 PDEU, z njihovim „učinkovitim prebivanjem" v državi članici gostiteljici ob vrnitvi za državljana tretje države, s katerim so živeli in ki se obravnava kot družinski član, ustvari izvedena pravica do prebivanja (na podlagi člena 21 PDEU).
European Citizens' Initiative (Article 24 TFEU; Article 11(4) TEU)
Evropska državljanska pobuda (člen 24 PDEU, člen 11(4) PEU)
[83: Directive (EU) 2015/637 of 20 April 2015 on the coordination and cooperation measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries and repealing Decision 95/553/EC, OJ L 106, 24.4.2015, pp.
[83: Direktiva Sveta (EU) 2015/637 z dne 20. aprila 2015 o ukrepih za usklajevanje in sodelovanje, potrebnih za lažje zagotavljanje konzularne zaščite državljanom Unije brez predstavništva v tretjih državah in o razveljavitvi Sklepa 95/553/ES (UL L 106, 24.4.2015, str.
[8: COM(2014) 2 final.][9: Directive 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, pp.
[8: COM(2014) 2 final.][9: Direktiva Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost (UL L 180, 19.7.2000, str.
Under Articles 20(2)(c) and 23 TFEU, EU citizens have the right to, in a territory of a non-EU country where their Member State of origin does not have representation, the protection of the diplomatic and consular authorities of any other Member State on the same conditions as that state's nationals.
V skladu s členom 20(2)(c) in členom 23 PDEU ima vsak državljan Unije na ozemlju tretje države, v kateri država članica, katere državljan je, nima predstavništva, pravico do zaščite diplomatskih ali konzularnih organov katere koli države članice pod enakimi pogoji, kakršni veljajo za državljane tiste države.
[17: Case C‑354/13 Kaltoft. ]
[17: Zadeva C-354/13, Kaltoft.]
In McCarthy the Court ruled that a Member State cannot require a non-EU family member of an EU citizen in possession of a residence card issued by another Member State first to obtain a visa to enter its territory.
V zadevi McCarthy je Sodišče razsodilo, da država članica od državljana tretje države, ki je družinski član državljana Unije in ima dovoljenje za prebivanje, ki ga je izdala druga država članica, ne more zahtevati pridobitve vizuma za vstop na njeno ozemlje.