natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This source of information should complement existing platforms, such as EURES advisers, SOLVIT and Your Europe Advice, which can assist the more than 11.8 million mobile Union citizens of working age who live outside their country of citizenship,.
S tem virom informacij bi bilo treba dopolniti obstoječe platforme, kot so svetovalci EURES, mreža SOLVIT in storitev Tvoja Evropa - nasveti, ki lahko pomagajo več kot 11,8 milijona delovno sposobnim mobilnim državljanom Unije, ki živijo zunaj svoje države državljanstva, .
In accordance with Article 9 of the Directive, this report discusses the Directive's implementation.
To poročilo v skladu s členom 9 Direktive obravnava njeno izvajanje.
In many countries, however, such dialogue rarely relates specifically to the free movement of workers (except, for example, in Bulgaria), is not regular or does not explicitly involve non-governmental organisations.
Vendar se tak dialog v številnih državah redko nanaša le na prosto gibanje delavcev (razen na primer v Bolgariji), ni reden ali ne vključuje izrecno nevladnih organizacij.
The list of bodies is made available online by the European Commission.
Evropska komisija je seznam organov objavila na spletu.
Some countries use social media applications (or plan to do so) to reach people in need of information.
Nekatere države uporabljajo (ali nameravajo uporabljati) aplikacije družbenih medijev, da dosežejo ljudi, ki potrebujejo informacije.
Likewise, therefore, the Commission does not consider it necessary to propose amendments to the Directive at this stage.
Zato se Komisiji za zdaj ne zdi potrebno, da bi predlagala spremembe Direktive.
Personal and material scope (Articles 1 and 2)
Osebno in stvarno področje uporabe (člena 1 in 2)
In Croatia foreign nationals who temporarily reside there are eligible to free legal aid subject to the principle of reciprocity.
Na Hrvaškem so tuji državljani, ki tam začasno prebivajo, upravičeni do brezplačne pravne pomoči na podlagi načela vzajemnosti.
Recital 15 of the Directive invites Member States to examine the implementation of common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms, as provided for in the Commission's Recommendation of 11 June 2013.
Uvodna izjava 15 Direktive države članice poziva, naj preučijo izvajanje skupnih načel za mehanizme kolektivnih opustitvenih in odškodninskih tožb, kot je določeno v Priporočilu Komisije z dne 11. junija 2013.
The bodies' independence is particularly relevant in countries where they are not stand-alone structures that per se would ensure at least some degree of independence.
Neodvisnost organov je posebej pomembna v državah, kjer ti niso samostojne strukture, ki bi jim bila kot takim zagotovljena vsaj določena mera neodvisnosti.
The Directive obliges Member States to ensure that their bodies not only cooperate with bodies in other Member States but also make use of the existing information and assistance services at Union level.
Direktiva države članice zavezuje, da zagotovijo, da njihovi organi ne le sodelujejo z organi v drugih državah članicah, temveč tudi uporabljajo obstoječe informacijske in podporne storitve na ravni Unije.
In the vast majority of Member States existing structures have been attributed the role of free movement body, the only exceptions being Germany and Slovenia where a new structure has been established.
V veliki večini držav članic je bila vloga organa za prosto gibanje dodeljena obstoječim strukturam, pri čemer sta edini izjemi Nemčija in Slovenija, kjer je bila ustanovljena nova struktura.
Only Austria, Estonia, Greece and a trade union in Lithuania pointed to independent assistance in legal proceedings actually being provided.
Le Avstrija, Estonija, Grčija in sindikat iz Litve so opozorili na to, da se neodvisna pomoč v pravnih postopkih dejansko zagotavlja.
The report is mainly based on information about the measures to transpose the Directive that Member States have communicated to the Commission under Article 8 of the Directive.
Poročilo temelji večinoma na informacijah o ukrepih za prenos Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo, ki so jih države članice sporočile Komisiji v skladu s členom 8 Direktive.
The bodies' additional workload varies substantially depending on the number of incoming and outgoing mobile workers.
Dodatna delovna obremenitev organov se precej razlikuje, odvisna pa je od števila prihajajočih in odhajajočih mobilnih delavcev.
These Member States have not adopted any legal act implementing the Directive.
Te države članice niso sprejele nobenega pravnega akta o izvajanju Direktive.
In accordance with Article 8 of the Directive, Member States had to transpose the Directive by 21 May 2016.
Države članice so morale Direktivo v skladu s členom 8 Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesti do 21. maja 2016.
The Directive is already operational and the Commission has not detected major problems of non-conformity among the national transposition measures.
Direktiva se že uporablja in Komisija ni odkrila večjih težav z neskladnostjo med nacionalnimi ukrepi za prenos.
References to the national laws transposing the Directive can be found on the Eur-Lex webpage.
Sklici na nacionalne zakone, s katerimi se Direktiva prenaša v nacionalno zakonodajo, so na voljo na spletišču Eur-Lex.
Nevertheless, both Articles did encourage some Member States to verify that their existing national rules indeed complied with the personal and material scope of the above provisions.
Vendar sta oba člena nekatere države članice kljub temu spodbudila, da so preverile, ali so njihova veljavna nacionalna pravila dejansko skladna z osebnim in stvarnim področjem uporabe navedenih določb.
It will also focus on creating better and more efficient conditions to accompany labour mobility in Europe through closer cooperation between national authorities.
Usmeril se bo tudi v ustvarjanje boljših in učinkovitejših pogojev, ki bodo spremljali mobilnost delovne sile v Evropi, s tesnejšim sodelovanjem med nacionalnimi organi.
A Commission report of 26 January 2018 provides more details about the progress made by Member States in implementing collective redress measures.
V poročilu Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2018 je podrobneje opisan napredek držav članic pri izvajanju ukrepov kolektivnih tožb.
Recent Union initiatives in this field as well as the proposal to establish a European Labour Authority should further help to maximise awareness of the key free movement rights.
Nedavne pobude Unije na tem področju ter predlog o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo bi morali nadalje prispevati k čim večji ozaveščenosti o bistvenih pravicah do prostega gibanja.
Some of these difficulties that Union workers face result from the misapplication of EU law by national authorities and/or private entities.
Nekatere od teh težav, s katerimi se srečujejo delavci Unije, izhajajo iz nepravilne uporabe prava Unije s strani nacionalnih organov in/ali zasebnih subjektov.
Member States should continue making sure that persons concerned are aware of the bodies and the support they provide.
Države članice bi si morale še naprej prizadevati, da bi zadevne osebe poznale organe in podporo, ki jo zagotavljajo.
This right has been further developed through secondary law, in particular Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union.
Ta pravica je bila nadalje razvita s sekundarno zakonodajo, zlasti Uredbo (EU) št. 492/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2011 o prostem gibanju delavcev v Uniji.
This can not only improve general awareness of rights and the procedures to defend them but also deter other employers and administrations from engaging in such practices.
To ne bo le izboljšalo splošne ozaveščenosti o pravicah in postopkih za njihovo zaščito, temveč bo tudi druge delodajalce in uprave odvrnilo od izvajanja takih praks.
Most Member States either have formal rules obliging national authorities to cooperate or provide relevant information to each other, or else nominate one of the authorities as ‘coordinating body'.
Večina držav članic ima bodisi uradna pravila, ki nacionalne organe zavezujejo k medsebojnemu sodelovanju ali zagotavljanju ustreznih informacij, bodisi imenuje enega od organov za „usklajevalni organ".
In accordance with recital 28, the Commission has also looked into the possible difficulties faced by young graduates looking for employment across the Union and by third-country spouses of Union workers.
Komisija bi morala v skladu z uvodno izjavo 28 tudi preučiti morebitne težave, s katerimi se srečujejo mladi diplomanti, ki iščejo zaposlitev po vsej Uniji, in tisti zakonci delavcev Unije, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav.
Most countries focus on: (1) providing assistance, mainly consisting of information and legal advice; (2) raising awareness about free movement rights and the activities of the bodies using various information channels; and/or (3) strengthening cooperation with other stakeholders.
Večina držav je usmerjena v: (1) zagotavljanje pomoči, ki v glavnem obsega informacije in pravne nasvete, (2) ozaveščanje o pravicah do prostega gibanja in dejavnostih organov z uporabo različnih informacijskih kanalov in/ali (3) povečanje sodelovanja z drugimi deležniki.
In many countries the provision of information is still an ongoing process, with new websites being established or existing ones revamped, information leaflets being prepared or information campaigns being conducted.
V številnih državah zagotavljanje informacij še vedno poteka, vzpostavljajo se nova spletišča ali prenavljajo obstoječa, pripravljajo se informativne brošure ali pa izvajajo informacijske kampanje.
Legislative amendments in many countries have been limited to transposing Article 4 on the designation of the body to promote equal treatment.
Zakonodajne spremembe so bile v številnih državah omejene na prenos člena 4 o določitvi organa za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja v nacionalno zakonodajo.
As part of the ongoing conformity check it is in contact with the Member States on the issues identified in this report.
V okviru trenutnega preverjanja skladnosti ima stike z državami članicami o vprašanjih iz tega poročila.
[34: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Labour Authority (COM(2018) 131 final, 13.3.2018).]
[34: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo (COM(2018) 131 final, 13.3.2018).]
The questionnaire asked Member States' authorities as well as social partners whether they consider that amendments to the Directive (or other legislation on free movement of workers) are necessary.
V vprašalniku je bilo organom držav članic in socialnim partnerjem postavljeno vprašanje, ali menijo, da so potrebne spremembe Direktive (ali druge zakonodaje o prostem gibanju delavcev).
They related to certain practices of public institutions on the recognition of professional qualifications and the granting of a right to reside for a family member of a Union national.
Nanašali sta se na nekatere prakse javnih ustanov glede priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij in podelitev pravice do prebivanja za družinskega člana državljana Unije.
It appears that in Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and the United Kingdom the independence of the bodies can be questioned.
Zdi se, da je v Bolgariji, na Hrvaškem, Cipru, Madžarskem, v Latviji, na Poljskem, Slovaškem, v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu vprašljiva neodvisnost organov.
As required under the Directive, there are no limitations on defending violated rights even after the relationship in which the alleged restriction and obstacle or discrimination occurred has ended.
Kot se zahteva v skladu z Direktivo, pri varstvu kršenih pravic ni omejitev, in sicer tudi po tem, ko se je razmerje, v katerem se je zgodilo domnevno omejevanje in oviranje ali diskriminacija, že končalo.
In September 2016 the Commission started infringement procedures against 12 Member States that had still failed to notify complete transposition of the Directive.
Komisija je septembra 2016 začela postopke ugotavljanja kršitev zoper 12 držav članic, ki še vedno niso priglasile, da so Direktivo v celoti prenesle v nacionalno zakonodajo.
[17: For more information, see Joint report on the application of Council Directive 2000/43/EC and of Council Directive 2000/78/EC (COM(2014) 2 final, 17.1.2014) and Report on the application of Council Directive 2004/113/EC (COM)2015)190 final, 5.5.2015.]
[17: Za dodatne informacije glej Skupno poročilo o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES in Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES (COM(2014) 2 final, 17.1.2014) ter Poročilo o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/113/ES (COM(2015) 190 final, 5.5.2015).]
The lack of information is explained by the fact that the Directive has been put in place only recently, that free movement bodies (Article 4) have not collected such information yet or that such cases are not grouped on the basis of discrimination against Union workers according to nationality.
Pomanjkanje informacij je mogoče pojasniti z dejstvom, da je bila Direktiva uvedena šele pred kratkim, da organi za prosto gibanje (člen 4) še niso zbrali takih informacij ali da take zadeve niso združene na podlagi diskriminacije delavcev Unije glede na državljanstvo.
The Commission is now finalising its analysis of the conformity of national measures to ensure that the Directive is correctly implemented.
Komisija zdaj končuje analizo skladnosti nacionalnih ukrepov zaradi zagotovitve pravilnega izvajanja Direktive.
Only Malta and Cyprus have adopted special provisions on victimisation after transposing the Directive.
Posebne določbe o viktimizaciji sta po prenosu Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo sprejela samo Malta in Ciper.
The analysis of national transposition measures reveals that a number of the provisions of the Directive have already been complied with through national instruments that already existed when the Directive entered into force.
Analiza nacionalnih ukrepov za prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo kaže, da je bilo več določb Direktive že izpolnjenih z nacionalnimi instrumenti, ki so obstajali že ob začetku veljavnosti Direktive.
No Member State mentioned implementing any of the Directive's provisions through collective agreements.
Nobena država članica ni omenila, da bi katero koli od določb Direktive izvedla s kolektivnimi pogodbami.
However, they seem to be limited and/or to happen ad hoc as there seem to be no concrete procedures or developed practices yet on how cooperation is carried out.
Vendar so omejeni in/ali priložnostni, saj konkretni postopki ali razvite prakse o načinu izvajanja sodelovanja še ne obstajajo.
In general, Member States envisaged non-legislative measures to implement provisions related to, in particular, functioning of the bodies (see 3.3) and/or improving access to (quality) information (see 3.5).
Države članice so za izvajanje določb, povezanih zlasti z delovanjem organov (glej oddelek 3.3) in/ali izboljšanjem dostopa do (kakovostnih) informacij (glej oddelek 3.5), na splošno predvidele nezakonodajne ukrepe.
The Commission will continue working with the Member States to ensure that the Directive is completely and correctly transposed and implemented in all of them.
Komisija bo še naprej sodelovala z državami članicami za zagotovitev, da se Direktiva v vsaki od njih v celoti in pravilno prenese v nacionalno zakonodajo.
To try to close the gap between the law and its application in practice, on 16 April 2014 the European Parliament and the Council adopted Directive 2014/54/EU on measures facilitating exercise of rights conferred on workers in the context of freedom of movement for workers (hereinafter 'the Directive').
Evropski parlament in Svet sta vrzel med zakonodajo in njeno uporabo v praksi poskusila zapolniti tako, da sta 16. aprila 2014 sprejela Direktivo 2014/54/EU o ukrepih za lažje uresničevanje pravic, podeljenih delavcem v okviru prostega gibanja delavcev (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Direktiva).
Even before adoption of the Directive, Member States had to ensure that their legislation on free movement applied to all categories of people and encompassed all the matters covered by Article 45 TFEU on a non-discriminatory basis.
Države članice so morale še pred sprejetjem Direktive zagotoviti, da se je njihova zakonodaja o prostem gibanju uporabljala za vse kategorije ljudi in je zajemala vsa vprašanja iz člena 45 PDEU na nediskriminacijski podlagi.
The replies to the questionnaire only point to two bodies that so far have dealt with complaints on free movement.
V izpolnjenih vprašalnikih sta navedena le dva organa, ki sta doslej obravnavala pritožbe o prostem gibanju.
The Directive was transposed in a variety of ways.
Direktiva je bila v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesena različno.
Despite a relatively stable and complete set of rules, as confirmed by a number of reports, Union citizens may continue to face practical problems in exercising their rights as EU workers.
Kot potrjuje več poročil, pa se lahko državljani Unije kljub razmeroma stabilnemu in celovitemu sklopu pravil še naprej srečujejo s praktičnimi težavami pri izvajanju svojih pravic kot delavci EU.
In November 2017 the last two countries notified complete transposition.
Novembra 2017 sta zadnji dve državi priglasili popoln prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Given that Articles 1 and 2 of the Directive retain the scope of Article 45 TFEU and of Regulation 492/2011, both of which are directly applicable, they did not generate new obligations for Member States in terms of transposition.
Glede na to, da člena 1 in 2 Direktive ohranjata področje uporabe člena 45 PDEU in Uredbe (EU) št. 492/2011, ki se neposredno uporabljata, nista ustvarila novih obveznosti za države članice v smislu prenosa v nacionalno zakonodajo.
In some countries there is specific legislation on access to courts by foreign workers.
V nekaterih državah obstaja posebna zakonodaja o dostopu tujih državljanov do pravnega varstva.
Tasks not mentioned include conducting surveys and analysis concerning obstacles to free movement, and making recommendations on any issue relating to unjustified restrictions and obstacles or to discrimination.
Naloge, ki niso navedene, obsegajo opravljanje raziskav in analiz v zvezi z oviranjem prostega gibanja ter pripravo priporočil o vseh vprašanjih v zvezi z neupravičenim omejevanjem in oviranjem ali diskriminacijo.
Given many countries' delays in transposing the Directive and the relatively short period it has applied in practice, robust conclusions on its impact cannot be drawn at this stage.
Ob upoštevanju zamud v številnih državah članicah pri prenosu Direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo in razmeroma kratkega obdobja njene uporabe v praksi za zdaj ni mogoče oblikovati trdnih zaključkov o njenem vplivu.
It is difficult, if possible at all, to assess to what extent the implementation of the Directive has helped raise Union citizens' awareness of their rights regarding free movement.
Težko je oceniti, če sploh, koliko je izvajanje Direktive prispevalo k povečanju ozaveščenosti državljanov Unije o njihovih pravicah v zvezi s prostim gibanjem.
It is enshrined in Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Zapisana je v členu 45 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU).
Other issues raised are not directly related to free movement rules, such as low wages for those who lack experience and a need to have practical skills in order to find a job.
Druga vprašanja, na katera je bilo opozorjeno in ki niso neposredno povezana s pravili o prostem gibanju, zajemajo na primer nizke plače oseb brez izkušenj in potrebo po praktičnih znanjih, da bi take osebe našle zaposlitev.
Many Member States are working on improving the way the bodies function, trying to address difficulties they face in performing their tasks and building their capacities.
Številne države članice se ukvarjajo s tem, kako izboljšati način delovanja organov, ter pri tem obravnavajo težave, s katerimi se srečujejo pri izvajanju nalog in krepitvi zmogljivosti.
Associations, organisations (including social partners) or other entities that have a legitimate interest under national law in ensuring that the Directive is complied with have a right to engage in judicial and/or administrative proceedings on behalf of or in support of Union workers.
Združenja, organizacije (vključno s socialnimi partnerji) ali drugi subjekti, ki imajo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo pravni interes za zagotavljanje skladnosti z Direktivo, imajo v imenu delavcev Unije ali v njihovo podporo pravico sodelovati v vseh sodnih in/ali upravnih postopkih.
Fourteen Member State governments and four national trade union organisations provided replies (by June 2018).
Odgovore je (do junija 2018) poslalo štirinajst vlad držav članic in štiri nacionalne sindikalne organizacije.
Overall, in most Member States the competence of the bodies covers all Union citizens.
V večini držav članic pristojnost organov na splošno zajema vse državljane Unije.
In particular it will promote cooperation between the bodies; ensure synergies between existing information and assistance services at Union level; and help Member States to improve the quality of information they provide on national websites and to raise awareness among Union workers of their rights.
Zlasti bo spodbujala sodelovanje med organi, ustvarjala sinergije med obstoječimi informacijskimi in podpornimi storitvami na ravni Unije ter državam članicam pomagala izboljšati kakovost informacij, ki jih zagotavljajo na nacionalnih spletiščih, in povečati ozaveščenost med delavci Unije o njihovih pravicah.
It appears that in Italy, Latvia, Slovakia and the United Kingdom not all the tasks are included in the responsibilities of the bodies.
Zdi se, da v Italiji, Latviji, na Slovaškem in v Združenem kraljestvu med odgovornosti organov niso vključene vse naloge.
Regarding protection against victimisation, in most countries measures to protect Union workers from adverse treatment or adverse consequences are stipulated in national anti- discrimination laws or employment laws.
V zvezi z zaščito pred viktimizacijo so ukrepi za zaščito delavcev Unije pred škodljivim obravnavanjem ali negativnimi posledicami v večini držav določeni v nacionalni protidiskriminacijski ali delovnopravni zakonodaji.
This includes drawing up work programmes/strategic plans; setting up partnerships with national stakeholders and bodies in other countries; improving access to information and services; and organising seminars and training for officials to strengthen their expertise in free movement of workers.
To vključuje pripravo delovnih programov/strateških načrtov, vzpostavljanje partnerstev z nacionalnimi deležniki in organi v drugih državah, izboljšanje dostopa do informacij in storitev ter organizacijo seminarjev in usposabljanj za uradnike, da se poglobi njihovo strokovno znanje o prostem gibanju delavcev.
It is therefore essential that, as required under paragraph 5 of Article 4, their tasks are adequately coordinated.
Zato je bistveno, da se njihove naloge ustrezno usklajujejo, kot se zahteva v skladu s členom 4(5).
Regarding third-country spouses, long processes or excessive administrative requirements (such as an obligation to ‘legalise' marriage certificates, and language requirements) in order to obtain visas, residence permits and/or social security numbers, or to obtain access to public services in general, were identified as common difficulties.
Kot skupne težave v zvezi z zakonci, ki prihajajo iz tretjih držav, so bili navedeni dolgi postopki ali prevelike upravne zahteve (kot je obveznost „legalizacije" poročnih listin in zahteve glede jezika) za pridobitev vizumov, dovoljenj za prebivanje in/ali številk socialnega zavarovanja ali pridobitev dostopa do javnih storitev na splošno.
This is exactly one of the problems that the Directive aims to address by improving the possibilities for people to defend their rights, making available assistance by the bodies and improving access to information.
Prav to pa je ena od težav, ki se v Direktivi poskuša obravnavati z izboljšanjem možnosti, ki jih imajo osebe za zaščito svojih pravic, dajanjem na voljo pomoči s strani organov in omogočanjem boljšega dostopa do informacij.