natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the combined amount of the Global Margin for Commitments and the Flexibility instrument is insufficient to finance the proposed increase of commitment appropriations, the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin for 2020 is the only available - the last resort - instrument to finance the remaining additional expenditure above the ceiling of heading 3.
Ker celotni znesek skupne razlike v okviru obveznosti in instrumenta prilagodljivosti ne zadostuje za financiranje predlaganega povečanja odobritev za prevzem obveznosti, je sprostitev varnostne rezerve za leto 2020 edini razpoložljivi instrument (skrajna možnost) za financiranje preostalih dodatnih odhodkov nad zgornjo mejo razdelka 3.
In the technical adjustment of the MFF for 2020, based on Article 6 of the MFF Regulation, the absolute amount of the Contingency Margin for the year 2020 is set at EUR 5 096,8 million.
V tehnični prilagoditvi večletnega finančnega okvira za leto 2020 na podlagi člena 6 uredbe o večletnem finančnem okviru je absolutni znesek varnostne rezerve za leto 2020 določen v višini 5 096,8 milijona EUR.
The Commission proposes to offset the proposed reinforcement of expenditure under heading 3 against the unallocated margin available under the expenditure ceiling of heading 5 Administration.
Komisija predlaga, da se predlagana okrepitev odhodkov v razdelku 3 pokrije z nedodeljeno razliko do zgornje meje odhodkov v razdelku 5 Uprava.
(1) Article 13 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 has established a Contingency Margin of up to 0,03 % of the Gross National Income of the Union.
(1) Člen 13 Uredbe Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 določa varnostno rezervo v višini do 0,03 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka Unije.
Therefore, the Commission proposes today to amend the MFF Regulation to remove the limitation in the scope of the Global Margin for Commitments and immediately to mobilise the full available amount for the Emergency Support Instrument and a further reinforcement of rescEU via DAB No 2/2020.
Zato Komisija danes predlaga spremembo uredbe o večletnem finančnem okviru, da bi se odpravila omejitev področja uporabe skupne razlike v okviru obveznosti in nemudoma uporabil celoten razpoložljivi znesek za instrument za nujno pomoč in dodatno okrepitev rescEU v PSP št. 2/2020.
There is no need to mobilise the Contingency Margin in payments.
Za plačila ni treba sprostiti varnostne rezerve.
Article 13(1) of the MFF Regulation defines the Contingency Margin as a last resort instrument to react to unforeseen circumstances.
V členu 13(1) uredbe o večletnem finančnem okviru je varnostna rezerva opredeljena kot skrajna možnost za odziv na nepredvidene okoliščine.
The amount of EUR 714 558 138 referred to in Article 1 shall be offset against the margin of the financial year 2020 of heading 5 Administration.
Znesek 714 558 138 EUR iz člena 1 se krije z razliko do zgornje meje v proračunskem letu 2020 za razdelek 5 Uprava.
In the 2020 budget, the Commission already proposed to use in full the unallocated margin under the commitment ceiling of heading 3.
V proračunu za leto 2020 je Komisija že predlagala, da se nerazporejena razlika do zgornje meje za obveznosti v razdelku 3 v celoti uporabi.
][12: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013, Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 508/2014 as regards specific measures to mobilise investments in the health care systems of the Member States and in other sectors of their economies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak [Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative], COM(2020) 113 final, 13.3.2020.]
][12: Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1303/2013, Uredbe (EU) št. 1301/2013 in Uredbe (EU) št. 508/2014 glede posebnih ukrepov za mobilizacijo naložb v zdravstvenih sistemih držav članic in v drugih sektorjih njihovih gospodarstev v odziv na izbruh COVID-19 [Naložbena pobuda v odziv na koronavirus] (COM(2020) 113 final, z dne 13. marca 2020).]
The Commission proposes to mobilise EUR 714,6 million through the Contingency Margin to cover the additional needs related to the reactivation of the ESI.
Komisija predlaga sprostitev 714,6 milijona EUR iz varnostne rezerve za kritje dodatnih potreb, povezanih s ponovno aktivacijo instrumenta za zagotavljanje nujne pomoči (ESI).
The mobilisation of the Contingency Margin is, nevertheless, necessary to address the needs stemming from the COVID-19 outbreak by increasing the commitment appropriations of heading 3 of the MFF in the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2020, over and above the ceiling of this heading, as proposed in Draft Amending Budget No 2/2020.
Sprostitev varnostne rezerve pa je potrebna za odzivanje na potrebe, ki izhajajo iz izbruha COVID-19, s povečanjem odobritev za prevzem obveznosti razdelka 3 večletnega finančnega okvira v splošnem proračunu Unije za proračunsko leto 2020, in sicer nad zgornjo mejo tega razdelka, kot se predlaga v predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 2/2020.
The Commission has proposed for heading 3 of the MFF in 2020 to use the Global Margin for Commitments for a total amount of 2 392 402 163 and to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument for a total amount of EUR 1 094 414 188.
Komisija je za razdelek 3 večletnega finančnega okvira v letu 2020 predlagala uporabo skupne razlike v okviru obveznosti v skupnem znesku 2 392 402 163 in uporabo instrumenta prilagodljivosti v skupnem znesku 1 094 414 188 EUR.
[18: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 15 May 2019 on the technical adjustment of the financial framework for 2020 in line with movements in GNI (COM(2019) 310).]
[18: Sporočilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 15. maja 2019 o tehnični prilagoditvi finančnega okvira za leto 2020 v skladu z gibanjem BND (COM(2016) 310).]
According to Article 13(4) of the MFF Regulation, the amounts offset shall not be further mobilised in the context of the MFF so that the total ceilings of commitment and payment appropriations laid down in the MFF for the current and future financial years shall not be exceeded.
V skladu s členom 13(4) uredbe o večletnem finančnem okviru se kriti zneski nadalje ne sprostijo v okviru večletnega finančnega okvira, tako da skupne zgornje meje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti in odobritev plačil, določene v večletnem finančnem okviru za tekoče in prihodnja proračunska leta, niso presežene.
Article 13(3) of the MFF Regulation requires that amounts made available through the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin shall be fully offset against the margins for the current or future financial years.
Člen 13(3) uredbe o večletnem finančnem okviru zahteva, da se zneski, ki so na voljo s sprostitvijo varnostne rezerve, v celoti pokrijejo z razlikami za tekoče ali prihodnja proračunska leta.
For the general budget of the Union for the financial year 2020, the Contingency Margin shall be mobilised to provide the amount of EUR 714 558 138 in commitment appropriations over and above the commitment ceiling of heading 3 (Security and citizenship) of the multiannual financial framework.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2020 se sprosti varnostna rezerva, da se zagotovi znesek 714 558 138 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti nad zgornjo mejo obveznosti v razdelku 3 (Varnost in državljanstvo) večletnega finančnega okvira.
The mobilisation of the remaining amount of the Flexibility Instrument has been proposed in DAB Nos 1 and 2/2020 to reach in total EUR 1 094,4 million.
Uporaba preostalega zneska instrumenta prilagodljivosti je bila predlagana v PSP št. 1 in PSP št. 2/2020, skupaj pa znaša 1 094,4 milijona EUR.
][2: COM(2019) 310, 15.5.2019.]
][2: COM(2019) 310 z dne 15. maja 2019.]
Finally, the Commission proposes, as a last resort, to mobilise the Contingency Margin for 2020 for an amount of EUR 714,6 million to ensure the full financing of commitment appropriations related to expenditure under heading 3 in the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2020, over and above the commitment ceiling.
Poleg tega Komisija kot skrajno možnost predlaga sprostitev varnostne rezerve za leto 2020 v višini 714,6 milijona EUR, da se zagotovi celotno financiranje odobritev za prevzem obveznosti v zvezi z odhodki iz razdelka 3 splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2020 nad zgornjo mejo obveznosti.
[11: Decision No 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
[11: Sklep št. 1313/2013/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. decembra 2013 o mehanizmu Unije na področju civilne zaščite (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
JUSTIFICATION OF THE MOBILISATION
UTEMELJITEV SPROSTITVE VARNOSTNE REZERVE
Council Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (‘MFF Regulation') allows for the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin of up to 0,03 % of Gross National Income for the EU-28 to react to unforeseen circumstances as a last resort instrument.
Uredba Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 z dne 2. decembra 2013 o večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2014-2020 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: uredba o večletnem finančnem okviru) kot skrajno možnost za odziv na nepredvidene okoliščine omogoča sprostitev varnostne rezerve v višini do 0,03 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka za EU-28.
[17: Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
[17: Uredba Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1311/2013 z dne 2. decembra 2013 o večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2014-2020 (UL L 347, 20.12.2013, str.
Consequently, the mobilisation of the Contingency Margin for commitment appropriations in 2020 under headings 3 and the related offsetting have to respect the total commitment ceiling for the year 2020, the last year of the current MFF period.
Zato sprostitev varnostne rezerve za odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v okviru razdelka 3 v letu 2020 in z njo povezano pokritje ne smeta preseči skupne zgornje meje za obveznosti za leto 2020, ki je zadnje leto sedanjega obdobja večletnega finančnega okvira.
EN 5 EN
SL 5 SL
No margin would remain available under the other expenditure ceilings.
Do drugih zgornjih mej odhodkov razlika ne bi bila na voljo.
THE CONTINGENCY MARGIN AS THE LAST RESORT INSTRUMENT
2.2 VARNOSTNA REZERVA KOT SKRAJNA MOŽNOST
OFFSETTING THE CONTINGENCY MARGIN AGAINST THE MFF CEILINGS
POKRITJE VARNOSTNE REZERVE Z RAZLIKAMI DO ZGORNJE MEJE IZ VEČLETNEGA FINANČNEGA OKVIRA
[14: OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p.
[14: UL C 373, 20.12.2013, str.
[16: OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p.
[16: UL C 373, 20.12.2013, str.
][8: COM(2020) 171, 2.4.2020.]
][8: COM(2020) 171 z dne 2. aprila 2020.]
Member States were requested to provide information on:
Države članice so morale predložiti informacije o:
In Malta there were two radio interviews.
Na Malti sta potekala dva radijska intervjuja.
COMMISSION WORKING DOCUMENT
DELOVNI DOKUMENT KOMISIJE
Most activities were related to research.
Večina dejavnosti je bila povezana z raziskavami.
[6: In particular, this report is without prejudice to any potential action in accordance with Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. ]
[6: To poročilo zlasti ne posega v kakršen koli morebitni ukrep v skladu s členom 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije. ]
Accidents
Nesreče
Poland provided no information on this aspect.
Poljska ni predložila informacij v zvezi s tem.
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the content of this report and of any use made of the information contained in this report.
Niti Evropska komisija niti katera koli druga oseba, ki deluje v njenem imenu, ni odgovorna za vsebino tega poročila in kakršno koli uporabo informacij iz tega poročila.
This report is based on 26 Member States' reports, given that two Member States did not submit individual reports.
To poročilo temelji na poročilih 26 držav članic, saj dve državi članici nista predložili posameznih poročil.
The majority of Member States established a web based system for regular public consultations.
Večina držav članic je vzpostavila spletni sistem za redna javna posvetovanja.
[5: The information for each Member State, as submitted, is available on …(internet site)]
[5: Predložene informacije za vsako državo članico so na voljo na spletnem naslovu [...].]
In general, there were no responses to public consultations.
V splošnem na javna posvetovanja ni bilo odzivov.
The Member States which did not provide any information on these aspects explained that there was no activity in this area.
Države članice, ki niso navedle informacij o teh vidikih, so pojasnile, da se na tem področju niso izvajale nobene dejavnosti.
Notification and approval system (and relevant changes)
Sistem prijave in odobritve (ter ustrezne spremembe)
Summary and Conclusions
Povzetek in sklepi
Waste disposal
Odstranjevanje odpadkov
In Belgium and Germany, the Competent Authorities are established at regional level, and in Spain and the United Kingdom certain competences are delegated to the regional authorities.
V Belgiji in Nemčiji pristojni organi delujejo na regionalni ravni, v Španiji in Združenem kraljestvu pa so nekatere pristojnosti prenesene na regionalne organe.
In the Czech Republic and in Bulgaria, the inspections were carried out on the basis of annual schedule.
V Češki republiki in Bolgariji so se inšpekcijski pregledi izvajali v skladu z letnim urnikom.
They considered that the Union regulatory framework for the new techniques should be reviewed to clarify whether organisms obtained with these new techniques fall under the scope of the Directive.
Po njihovem mnenju bi bilo treba pregledati regulativni okvir Unije za nove tehnike, da se pojasni, ali organizmi, pridobljeni s temi novimi tehnikami, spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive.
Croatia, which became a Member State of the Union in July 2013, was requested to submit the report on its experience with the Directive for the first time as of 2013.
Hrvaška je julija 2013 postala država članica Unije, zato se je leta 2013 od nje prvič zahtevalo, da predloži poročilo o svojih izkušnjah s to direktivo.
Both specialised and no specialised waste treatment facilities were used.
Uporabljale so specializirane in nespecializirane objekte za obdelavo odpadkov.
The process of notification and approval is similar and timelines well respected.
Postopek prijave in odobritve je podoben in roki se spoštujejo.
Denmark has started to review its national procedures in order to facilitate the process for both companies and authorities.
Danska je začela pregledovati nacionalne postopke, da bi olajšala celoten proces za podjetja in organe.
In Hungary, the notifications published on the internet contain a summary of the risk assessment available at the Secretariat of Gene Technology Advisory Board.
Na Madžarskem prijave, objavljene na internetu, vsebujejo povzetek ocene tveganja, ki je na voljo pri sekretariatu svetovalnega odbora za gensko tehnologijo.
The information contained in this report is based on Member States individual reports and, therefore, does not represent the position of the European Commission.
Informacije v tem poročilu temeljijo na posameznih poročilih držav članic in zato ne predstavljajo stališča Evropske komisije.
Belgium reported one accident (fire) in a biological waste storage room without the competent authority having been informed.
Belgija je poročala o eni nesreči (požaru) v skladišču za biološke odpadke, o kateri pristojni organ ni bil obveščen.
The present report covers the period from June 2009 to June 2014 following the previous report for the period 2006-2009.
To poročilo zajema obdobje od junija 2009 do junija 2014, predhodno poročilo pa je zajemalo obdobje 2006-2009.
Although there are significantly fewer class 3 and 4 activities being carried out, their number is increasing.
Čeprav se izvaja bistveno manj dejavnosti iz razredov 3 in 4, se njihovo število povečuje.
Activities were also carried out in hospitals, public institutions, education (universities) or in detection laboratories.
Dejavnosti so se izvajale tudi v bolnišnicah, javnih ustanovah, izobraževalnih ustanovah (na univerzah) ali laboratorijih za odkrivanje.
Similarly, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, would like to simplify the procedures for Class 1 and 2 activities.
Podobno Španija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo želijo, da se poenostavijo postopki za dejavnosti iz razredov 1 in 2.
Belgium had difficulties interpreting the provisions of the Directive 2009/41/EC concerning commercial activities involving bacterial transformation.
Belgija je imela težave z razlago določb Direktive 2009/41/ES glede komercialnih dejavnosti, ki vključujejo bakterijsko transformacijo.
The Netherlands reported a number of specific technical issues including differences in the (strict) GMO-regulations and the less strict regulation of wild type pathogens (Netherlands).
Nizozemska je v poročilu omenila več posebnih tehničnih vprašanj, vključno z razlikami med (strogimi) predpisi za GSO in manj strogimi predpisi za patogene divjega tipa (Nizozemska).
The number of inspectors involved in GMM control also varied among Member States.
Tudi število inšpektorjev, vključenih v nadzor GSM, se je razlikovalo med državami članicami.
In terms of public consultation and information, almost all reporting Member States have implemented provisions for conducting public consultations, and for informing the public on the outcome of their activities under the Directive.
Kar zadeva javno posvetovanje in obveščanje, so skoraj vse države članice, ki so predložile poročilo, izvajale določbe o opravljanju javnih posvetovanj in obveščanju javnosti o rezultatih svojih dejavnosti v skladu z Direktivo.
While the transformation kit is not sold in Belgium, its availability via the internet could potentially make the enforcement of the provisions of 2009/41/EC difficult.
Čeprav se komplet za transformacijo ne prodaja v Belgiji, bi bilo zaradi njegove razpoložljivosti prek interneta morda težko izvrševati določbe Direktive 2009/41/ES.
In Slovenia, delays occurred when the external experts (Scientific Committee) or another national body was involved in the processing of a notification.
V Sloveniji so nastale zamude, če so pri obdelavi prijave sodelovali zunanji strokovnjaki (znanstveni odbor) ali drug nacionalni organ.
Some Member States also employ advisory scientific bodies in the risk assessment/authorisation process.
V nekaterih državah članicah pri ocenjevanju tveganj/postopku odobritve sodelujejo tudi svetovalni znanstveni organi.
Although the internet was primarily used, other means of communication (seminars, meetings, brochures, etc.) were employed.
Čeprav so to večinoma izvajale prek interneta, so uporabile tudi druga komunikacijska sredstva (seminarje, sestanke, brošure itd.).
In the two Member States which received responses, the summaries of the comments were made available on the Competent Authorities' website.
V državah članicah, ki sta prejeli odzive, so bili povzetki pripomb objavljeni na spletnem mestu pristojnih organov.
Moreover, it is not always possible to distinguish the amendments to earlier notifications from other types of subsequent contained use activities (continuation of activity or new activity).
Poleg tega ni vedno mogoče razlikovati med spremembami prejšnjih prijav in drugimi vrstami dejavnosti nadaljnje uporabe v zaprtem sistemu (nadaljevanje dejavnosti ali nova dejavnost).
In Spain, the waste inactivation is optional for class 1 and obligatory for class 2, 3 and 4 but the Competent Authority recommends operators to inactivate the GMOs in all cases.
V Španiji je inaktivacija odpadkov neobvezna za razred 1 in obvezna za razrede 2, 3 in 4, vendar pristojni organ izvajalcem priporoča, naj GSO inaktivirajo v vseh primerih.
In the Brussels-Capital Region some problems were encountered in the notification process due to the Brussels legislation which has set up numerous different procedures regarding the class of risk (8 in total).
Regija prestolnice Bruselj je imela nekaj težav pri postopku prijave zaradi bruseljske zakonodaje, ki določa več različnih postopkov za en razred tveganja (skupno osem).
In another instance, a commercially available (via the internet) bacterial transformation kit was used to produce a Class 1 GMM.
V drugem primeru se je komercialno razpoložljiv (prek interneta) komplet za bakterijsko transformacijo uporabil za pridobivanje GSM iz razreda 1.
For Slovenia, the inclusion of safe organisms in Part C of the Annex II of Directive 2009/41/EC could contribute to the reduction of the number and size of notifications.
Slovenija meni, da bi lahko vključitev varnih organizmov v del C Priloge II k Direktivi 2009/41/ES prispevala k zmanjšanju števila in obsega prijav.
Within the framework of Directive 2009/41/EC, the premises for contained use activities must be notified to the national competent authorities when they are to be used for the first time.
V skladu z Direktivo 2009/41/ES je treba prostore za dejavnosti uporabe v zaprtem sistemu prijaviti pri pristojnih nacionalnih organih, ko se prvič uporabijo.
Member States applied the Directive in a similar fashion in terms of administration, handling of the notifications, inspections, waste disposal and public consultation and information.
Države članice so Direktivo uporabljale na podoben način v smislu uprave, obravnave prijav, inšpekcijskih pregledov, odstranjevanja odpadkov ter javnih posvetovanj in obveščanja.
In Germany, there are two genetic engineering facilities where large animals can be disposed of with the help of a digester (alkaline hydrolysis).
V Nemčiji delujeta dva objekta za gensko inženirstvo, v katerih se lahko z uporabo gnilišča odstranijo velike živali (alkalna hidroliza).
In some Member States inspections were conducted by specialised inspectors from the Competent Authority, while in others inspections were carried out at the request of the Competent Authorities by specialised inspectors from other ministries or services.
V nekaterih državah članicah so inšpekcijske preglede izvajali specializirani inšpektorji pristojnega organa, v drugih pa so jih na zahtevo pristojnih organov izvajali specializirani inšpektorji drugih ministrstev ali služb.
In some instances, Member States required the most stringent waste management treatment for all classes of GMMs.
V nekaterih primerih so države članice zahtevale najstrožje ravnanje z odpadki za vse razrede GSM.
Others (Poland), allowed the Competent Authorities to decide whether a public consultation was needed on the basis of the Class of the activities.
Druge države članice (Poljska) so pristojnim organom dovolile, da se na podlagi razreda dejavnosti odločijo, ali je potrebno javno posvetovanje.
Public consultation and information
Javno posvetovanje in obveščanje
The following text summarises the information given by Member States under the headings provided and highlights similarities of and differences between the experiences of the Member States.
V nadaljevanju so povzete informacije, ki so jih pod navedenimi naslovi predložile države članice, ter izpostavljene podobnosti in razlike med izkušnjami držav članic.
National systems differed slightly in terms of authorities involved.
Nacionalni sistemi so se nekoliko razlikovali v tem, kateri organi so bili vanje vključeni.
The national reports showed that Member States addressed clinical trials in considerably different ways.
Iz nacionalnih poročil je razvidno, da so države članice klinična preskušanja obravnavale zelo različno.
In Denmark, all activities were inspected upon notification of new premises or of changes in existing ones.
Na Danskem so se ob prijavi novih prostorov ali sprememb obstoječih prostorov pregledale vse dejavnosti.
In Austria, there are special legal national provisions for applications concerning gene therapy in clinical trials.
V Avstriji veljajo posebne nacionalne pravne določbe za uporabe pri genskem zdravljenju v kliničnih preskušanjih.