natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When will the policy be reviewed?
Kdaj se bo politika pregledala?
What legislative and non-legislative policy options have been considered?
Katere zakonodajne in nezakonodajne možnosti politike so se upoštevale?
What is the added value of action at EU level (subsidiarity) Maximum 7 lines
Kakšna je dodana vrednost ukrepanja na ravni EU (subsidiarnost) Največ 7 vrstic
Who supports which option?
Kdo podpira katero možnost?
Significant additional administrative and regulatory costs are not expected.
Ne pričakujejo se znatni dodatni upravni in regulativni stroški.
Soft law measures are adaptable to Member States' needs.
Ukrepi mehkega prava se prilagajajo potrebam držav članic.
Consistent and appropriate measures are needed to address the problems identified.
Za odpravo ugotovljenih težav so potrebni dosledni in ustrezni ukrepi.
How will businesses, SMEs and micro-enterprises be affected?
Kakšen bo vpliv na podjetja, MSP ter mikropodjetja?
In addition to regular monitoring, it is proposed that the Commission will submit an implementation report to the European Parliament and the Council 3 years after the entry into application of the legislative measures.
Predlaga se, da Komisija poleg rednega spremljanja Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu tri leta po začetku uporabe zakonodajnih ukrepov predloži poročilo o izvajanju.
Will there be significant impacts on national budgets and administrations?
Ali bo prišlo do znatnih učinkov na nacionalne proračune in uprave?
All national administrations will eventually benefit from time savings in administration and public services.
V končni fazi bodo vse nacionalne uprave imele koristi od prihranka časa pri upravi in javnih storitvah.
The preferred option will have no significant cost impact on businesses.
Prednostna možnost ne bo imela pomembnega vpliva na stroške podjetij.
B. Solutions
B. Rešitve
Free movement of persons will also be facilitated, because improved documents will permit quicker, easier and more secure use of documents.
Poleg tega se bo olajšalo prosto gibanje oseb, saj bodo izboljšani dokumenti omogočili hitrejšo, enostavnejšo in varnejšo uporabo dokumentov.
The preferred options will bring direct benefits in many areas, though these are not easily quantifiable.
Prednostne možnosti bodo prinesle neposredne koristi na številnih področjih, čeprav je te težko količinsko opredeliti.
EU action is needed to promote the free movement of persons and increase the level of security within the EU, as both issues have a cross-border dimension and cannot be dealt with by individual Member States alone.
Ukrepi na ravni EU so potrebni za spodbujanje prostega gibanja oseb in povečanje stopnje varnosti v EU, ker imata obe vprašanji čezmejno razsežnost in ju ne morejo obravnavati posamezne države članice same.
Specific sensitivities regarding the collection of biometric data of minors will be taken into account.
Upoštevala se bo potreba po posebni občutljivosti ob zbiranju biometričnih podatkov mladoletnikov.
Impact assessment on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement
Ocena učinka predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o okrepitvi varnosti osebnih izkaznic državljanov Unije in dokumentov za prebivanje, izdanih državljanom Unije in njihovim družinskim članom, ki uresničujejo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja
What is this initiative expected to achieve?
Kaj naj bi prinesla ta pobuda?
The improvement in consistency with regard to the various types of documents will also offer some opportunities for card producers.
Izboljšanje skladnosti različnih vrst dokumentov bo nekaj možnosti ponudilo tudi proizvajalcem kartic.
The preferred option will allow businesses, including SMEs and micro-enterprises, to have more trust in the identification documents presented by potential clients from other Member States and therefore broaden their business opportunities.
Prednostna možnost bo podjetjem, vključno z MSP in mikropodjetji, omogočila večje zaupanje v predložene identifikacijske dokumente potencialnih strank iz drugih držav članic, kar bo razširilo njihove poslovne priložnosti.
Whether compliance costs for new documents will be transferred to citizens will depend on the Member State administrations.
Ali se bodo stroški zagotavljanja skladnosti novih dokumentov prenesli na državljane, bo odvisno od uprav držav članic.
C. Impacts of the preferred option
C. Učinki prednostne možnosti
If national measures are not coordinated, they could create further problems (and consequently significant costs) for European citizens, national authorities or businesses/private sector.
Neusklajeni nacionalni ukrepi bi lahko povzročili dodatne težave (in posledično znatne stroške) za evropske državljane, nacionalne organe ali podjetja oziroma zasebni sektor.
These costs will be in proportion to the speed of the phasing out.
Ti stroški bodo sorazmerni hitrosti postopnega opuščanja.
The same approach will be followed as for the EU legislation on biometric passports and residence permits.
Uporabil se bo isti pristop kot za zakonodajo EU o biometričnih potnih listih in dovoljenjih za prebivanje.
Council Conclusions stress the importance of the security of ID cards and residence documents.
V sklepih Sveta je poudarjen pomen varnosti osebnih izkaznic in dokumentov za prebivanje.
A. Need for action
A. Nujnost ukrepanja
Will there be other significant impacts?
Bo imela pobuda druge pomembnejše učinke?
To make quicker gains on security, the phasing out of weaker ID cards will create some cost in a number of Member States.
Za hitrejše pridobivanje koristi glede varnosti bo postopno opuščanje varnostno šibkejših osebnih izkaznic v več državah članicah povzročilo nekaj stroškov.
This will require a common EU-wide approach to bring consistency to the new rules on the format and security features of ID and residence documents and promote cross-border cooperation.
Za to bo potreben skupen pristop EU, ki bo prispeval k skladnosti novih pravil glede oblike in varnostnih značilnosti identifikacijskih dokumentov in dokumentov za prebivanje ter spodbujal čezmejno sodelovanje.
This is of particular interest to smaller enterprises that do not have the financial and personal means to develop processes, expertise and staff training to handle identification documents correctly.
To je zlasti pomembno za manjša podjetja, ki nimajo finančnih ali kadrovskih virov za razvoj postopkov, strokovnega znanja in usposabljanja osebja za pravilno ravnanje z identifikacijskimi dokumenti.
The options are grouped: (a) ID cards, (b) residence documents and (c) process, to reflect the specific measures needed to address the problems of each group.
Možnosti so razdeljene na skupine: (a) osebne izkaznice, (b) dokumenti za prebivanje in (c) postopek, da se ustrezno upoštevajo posebni ukrepi, potrebni za reševanje problemov posamezne skupine.
The general objective of the proposal is twofold: • to improve security within the EU and at its borders; • to facilitate EU citizens' right to move and reside freely in the EU.
Predlog ima dva splošna cilja: • izboljšati varnost znotraj EU in na njenih mejah; • olajšati uresničevanje pravice državljanov EU do prostega gibanja in prebivanja v EU.
A majority of EU citizens consulted support the wider EU harmonisation of national ID cards (ID 2), and are in favour of overall harmonised residence documents (RES 3).
Večina vprašanih državljanov EU podpira širšo harmonizacijo nacionalnih osebnih izkaznic na ravni EU (ID 2) in je naklonjenih splošni harmonizaciji dokumentov za prebivanje (RES 3).
The financial impacts will vary from Member State to Member State, depending on the extent of the changes needed (compliance cost for phasing-in) and how quickly these improvements are implemented (compliance cost for phasing-out).
Finančne posledice se bodo v državah članicah razlikovale glede na obseg potrebnih sprememb (stroški zagotavljanja skladnosti pri postopnem uvajanju) in glede na hitrost uveljavljanja teh izboljšav (stroški zagotavljanja skladnosti pri postopnem opuščanju).
D. Follow up
D. Spremljanje
All this leads to considerable burden and cost for (a) EU citizens and their family members when travelling or exercising their right to free movement; (b) public authorities, such as border guards; and (c) public and private sector entities, such as social security services, banks and airlines.
Vse navedeno povzroča znatno breme in stroške (a) državljanom EU in njihovim družinskim članom, kadar potujejo ali uresničujejo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja; (b) javnim organom, kot so mejni policisti, ter (c) subjektom javnega in zasebnega sektorja, kot so službe za socialno varnost, banke in letalski prevozniki.
The preferred option will impact on fundamental rights, and in particular in relation to Article 7 of the Charter on respect for private life and Art 8 on the right to the protection of personal data.
Prednostna možnost bo imela učinek na temeljne pravice, zlasti na spoštovanje zasebnega življenja iz člena 7 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih človekovih pravicah in na pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov iz njenega člena 8.
Several national authorities (CY, DK, EE, FR, EL and LU) favour at least harmonising residence cards for non-EU family members on the basis of the uniform format for residence permits (RES 2).
Več nacionalnih organov (CY, DK, EE, FR, EL in LU) je naklonjenih vsaj harmonizaciji dovoljenj za prebivanje za družinske člane, ki niso državljani EU, in sicer na podlagi enotne oblike dovoljenja za prebivanje (RES 2).
For national ID cards and residence cards for non-EU family members, Member States can build on the existing infrastructure (card readers, document scanners, equipment to take and verify biometric data) and production processes for passports and residence permits.
Za nacionalne osebne izkaznice in dovoljenja za prebivanje za družinske člane, ki niso državljani EU, lahko države članice nadgradijo obstoječo infrastrukturo (čitalnike kartic, skenerje dokumentov, opremo za odvzemanje in preverjanje biometričnih podatkov) in procese izdelave potnih listov in dovoljenj za prebivanje.
What are the costs of the preferred option (if any, otherwise main ones)?
Kakšni so stroški prednostne možnosti (če obstaja, sicer glavnih možnosti)?
What are the benefits of the preferred option (if any, otherwise main ones)?
Kakšne so koristi prednostne možnosti (če obstaja, sicer glavnih možnosti)?
The preferred option will ensure safeguards and guarantee the data subject's right applicable under the General Data Protection Regulation including the right to effective remedy.
Prednostna možnost bo zagotovila zaščitne ukrepe in zajamčila pravice posameznika, na katerega se nanašajo osebni podatki, ki veljajo na podlagi splošne uredbe o varstvu podatkov, vključno s pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva.
These problems are mainly driven by differences and inconsistency in the format, design and layout of ID cards and residence documents, and insufficient coordination of, awareness amongst and training for stakeholders involved in handling these documents.
Te težave so v glavnem posledica razlik in nedoslednosti, kar zadeva obliko, zasnovo in strukturo osebnih izkaznic in dokumentov za prebivanje, ter nezadostnih usklajevanja, ozaveščenosti in usposabljanj deležnikov, ki so vključeni v obravnavo teh dokumentov.
The indirect benefits of the preferred options will include a reduction in document fraud and identity theft and a generally improved level of security (reduction of crime, fraud and terrorism) within the EU and at its borders.
Posredne koristi prednostnih možnosti vključujejo zmanjšanje ponarejanja dokumentov in kraje identitete ter splošno izboljšanje stopnje varnosti (zmanjšanje pojava kriminala, goljufij in terorizma) znotraj EU in na njenih mejah.
The specific objectives of the proposal are: • to improve acceptance and authentication of ID cards and residence documents and reduce document fraud; • to improve identification of people based upon ID documents; • to raise awareness about these documents and the rights linked to them, including through training; • to simplify daily life for citizens, cut red tape and lower costs for all stakeholders.
Specifični cilji predloga so: • izboljšati sprejemanje in preverjanje verodostojnosti osebnih izkaznic in dokumentov za prebivanje ter omejiti ponarejanje dokumentov; • izboljšati ugotavljanje istovetnosti ljudi na podlagi identifikacijskih dokumentov; • ozaveščati o teh dokumentih in pravicah, ki so povezane z njimi, med drugim s pomočjo usposabljanj; • poenostaviti vsakodnevno življenje državljanov ter zmanjšati birokracijo in stroške za vse deležnike.
The main problems addressed by the initiative, affecting free movement and internal security, are: insufficient security of national ID cards and residence documents issued to non-EU family members; insufficient acceptance by public and private entities of ID cards and residence documents; complexity in issuing, handling and administering these documents.
Glavne težave, ki jih obravnava pobuda ter vplivajo na prosto gibanje in notranjo varnost, so: nezadostna varnost nacionalnih osebnih izkaznic in dokumentov za prebivanje, izdanih družinskim članom, ki niso državljani EU; nezadostno sprejemanje osebnih izkaznic in dokumentov za prebivanje s strani javnih in zasebnih subjektov; zapletenost izdajanja in upravljanja teh dokumentov ter ravnanja z njimi.
The evidence available shows that improved acceptance of documents and enhanced document security will yield direct and recurrent cost savings and a reduced administrative burden for citizens and their family members, public administrations (e.g. border guards checking documents) and public and private service operators (e.g. airlines, health, banks and insurance and social security providers).
Razpoložljivi dokazi kažejo, da bosta boljše sprejemanje dokumentov in povečana varnost listin prinesla neposredne in ponavljajoče se prihranke pri stroških in zmanjšanje upravnega bremena za državljane in njihove družinske člane, javne uprave (npr. mejno policijo pri preverjanju dokumentov) ter javne in zasebne ponudnike storitev (npr. letalske prevoznike in zdravstveni sektor, banke ter ponudnike zavarovanj in socialnega varstva).
The (one-off) compliance cost of phasing in the upgraded documents will vary from Member State to Member State, depending on the quality of the documents currently issued.
(Enkratni) stroški zagotavljanja skladnosti, potrebni za postopno uvajanje teh posodobljenih dokumentov, bodo v posameznih državah članicah različni, odvisno od kakovosti dokumentov, ki jih trenutno izdajajo.
These problems make it more complicated to reliably identify the document holder and authenticate the documents and increase the risk of these being misused or wrongly rejected (e.g. at border crossings, in administrative registration, when accessing services).
Zaradi teh težav je težje zanesljivo ugotoviti istovetnost imetnika dokumenta in preveriti verodostojnost dokumentov, kar povečuje tveganje zlorabe dokumentov ali njihove neupravičene zavrnitve (npr. na mejnih prehodih, upravnih registracijah ali pri dostopanju do storitev).
In most cases, costs will be minimised by aligning the phasing in with the natural replacement cycle of documents.
V večini primerov se bodo stroški zmanjšali s pomočjo uskladitve postopnega uvajanja s ciklom redne menjave dokumentov.
What is the problem being addressed?
V čem je težava?
Costs will be minimised as the replacements are expected to mostly be synchronised with the natural replacement cycle.
Stroški bodo karseda zmanjšani, saj naj bi se nadomeščanje dokumentov večinoma uskladilo s ciklom njihove redne menjave.
Many national authorities and NGOs support soft law measures for all types of documents (all SOFT options).Some national authorities dealing with the issue of free movement (AT, CZ, HR, DK, NL, MT and PL) do not see the need for legislation, while the introduction of minimum features for ID cards (ID 1) is favoured by others (BG, CY, DE, EE, EL, FI, IE, PT, RO, SI and SK).
Nekateri nacionalni organi, ki se ukvarjajo z vprašanjem prostega gibanja (AT, CZ, HR, DK, NL, MT in PL) ne vidijo potrebe po zakonodaji, medtem ko so drugi naklonjeni uvedbi minimalnih značilnosti osebnih izkaznic (ID 1) (BG, CY, DE, EE, EL, FI, IE, PT, RO, SI in SK).
The phasing out of non-compliant residence cards for non-EU family members will also lead to some additional (one-off) costs.
Nekatere (enkratne) stroške bo povzročilo tudi postopno opuščanje neskladnih dovoljenj za prebivanje za družinske člane, ki niso državljani EU.
Option 0: maintaining the status quo; Options ID: format and security of ID cards - ID SOFT): non-legislative measures related to ID cards (such as awareness-raising and training) - ID 1): ID SOFT, plus setting minimum common requirements for ID format and security - ID 2): ID SOFT, plus ID 1), with a common format for ID cards, including mandatory fingerprints - ID3): ID SOFT with the possibility of issuing an EU ID card in addition to national ID cards Options RES: format and security of residence documents - RES SOFT): non-legislative measures related to residence documents - RES 1): RES SOFT plus the harmonisation of a limited amount of residence document data - RES 2): RES SOFT plus RES 1) with a common format for residence documents of non-EU family members - RES 3): RES SOFT plus RES 1) with a common format for all residence documents, Options PROCESS: process for issuing documents and sharing information between Member States - PROCESS SOFT): promote more and better options for requesting and receiving documents - PROCESS 1): PROCESS SOFT and the ability to issue ID cards through consular networks The preferred options are ID 1), RES 2) and PROCESS SOFT).
Možnosti ID: oblika in varnost osebnih izkaznic: - ID SOFT): nezakonodajni ukrepi, povezani z osebnimi izkaznicami (na primer ozaveščanje in usposabljanje); - ID 1): ID SOFT in določitev minimalnih skupnih zahtev za obliko in varnost osebnih izkaznic; - ID 2): ID SOFT in ID 1) s skupno obliko osebnih izkaznic, vključno z obveznimi prstnimi odtisi; - ID 3): ID SOFT in možnost izdajanja osebne izkaznice EU poleg nacionalnih osebnih izkaznic.
Maximum 8 lines
Največ 8 vrstic
Maximum 4 lines
Največ 4 vrstice
Maximum 12 lines
Največ 12 vrstic
Is there a preferred choice or not?
Ali ima katera od njih prednost?
Maximum 11 lines
Največ 11 vrstic
Maximum 7 lines
Največ 7 vrstic
Maximum 14 lines
Največ 14 vrstic
Policy priorities
Prednostne naloge politike
These activities will mutually reinforce each other.
Te dejavnosti bodo vzajemno krepile druga drugo.
The ICT sector has been growing in the last 10 years and is expected to continue to create jobs.
Sektor IKT v zadnjih desetih letih raste in pričakuje se, da bo še naprej ustvarjal nova delovna mesta.
Survey from 2015. ]
Raziskava iz leta 2015. ]
ensure the swift implementation of the non-legislative actions laid down in the Communication.
zagotovila hitro izvajanje nezakonodajnih ukrepov, navedenih v sporočilu.
Eight main strands of action have been identified:
Opredeljenih je bilo osem glavnih poti ukrepanja:
... and discrimination, allowed by a lack of transparency
... in diskriminacije, ki jo omogoča pomanjkanje preglednosti
Outcomes of EU-funded research.
Rezultati raziskave, ki jo je financirala EU.
Therefore it remains a political priority for the Commission.
Iz tega razloga ima Komisija to vprašanje za politično prednostno nalogo.
[19: As announced in its report on the evaluation of the 2014 Recommendation.]
[19: Kot je bilo napovedano v njenem poročilu o oceni priporočila iz leta 2014.]
Moreover, labour market developments have been in general unfavourable to low-wage workers.
Poleg tega razvoj na trgu dela na splošno ni bil v prid delavcem z nizkimi plačami.
[6: EC (2015) An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe?
[6: ES (2015), An ever closer union among the peoples of Europe?
The platform now consists of 18 Diversity Charters from the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain and Sweden.
Platformo trenutno tvori 18 listin o raznovrstnosti iz naslednjih držav: Avstrija, Belgija, Češka, Danska, Estonija, Finska, Francija, Nemčija, Madžarska, Irska, Italija, Luksemburg, Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska, Slovaška, Španija in Švedska.
The focus will be on concrete tools and legal instruments and on the challenges involved in implementing them;
Osredotočali se bodo na konkretna orodja in pravne instrumente ter na izzive pri njihovem izvajanju;
improving sanctions and compensation to victims by evaluating the need to introduce measures such as:
izboljšanje sankcij in odškodnin žrtvam s proučitvijo potrebe po uvedbi ukrepov, kot so:
Such measures would contribute to boosting jobs and growth in the EU and to having a fairer single market for employment.
Taki ukrepi bi prispevali k spodbujanju delovnih mest in rasti v EU ter k bolj poštenemu enotnemu trgu na področju zaposlovanja.
However, sanctions provided for in the national laws of the Member States vary widely which leads to an unequal enforcement of the rights granted under the Directive]
Vendar pa se sankcije, določene v nacionalnih zakonodajah držav članic, močno razlikujejo, kar povzroča neenako izvrševanje pravic na podlagi direktive.]
[51: DE, EE, IE, ES, IT, AT, PL, RO, SK.][52: Notably in EE.]
[51: DE, EE, IE, ES, IT, AT, PL, RO, SK.][52: Predvsem v EE.]
The Recommendation invites Member States to choose and implement at least one of the above measures in the light of their domestic circumstances.
Države članice so v priporočilu pozvane, naj izberejo in izvedejo vsaj enega od zgoraj navedenih ukrepov ob upoštevanju svojih okoliščin.
The current situation suggests the need to consider further-reaching measures at EU level.
Iz trenutnega stanja izhaja potreba po razmisleku o daljnosežnejših ukrepih na ravni EU.
[32: Between 2014 and 2016, EUR 5 million were allocated to 23 projects on this topic.]
[32: Med letoma 2014 in 2016 je bilo za 23 projektov na to temo namenjenih 5 milijonov EUR.]
However, only around 16% of the almost 8 million people working in ICT are women.
Kljub temu pa ženske predstavljajo le približno 16 % od skoraj 8 milijonov ljudi, ki delajo v IKT.
A specific module on this topic will be included in the Eurostat's annual labour Force Survey;
Poseben modul na to temo bo vključen v Eurostatovo letno anketo o delovni sili;
the need for and possibility of making some or all of the measures on pay transparency foreseen in the 2013 Recommendation binding, such as:
kakšne so potrebe in možnosti, da nekateri ali vsi ukrepi glede preglednosti plačil, predvideni v priporočilu iz leta 2013, postanejo zavezujoči, kot na primer:
Moreover, the secrecy around pay levels makes it even more difficult to detect discrimination cases.
Poleg tega je zaradi tajnosti glede ravni plačil še težje zaznati primere diskriminacije.
[24: The EU-level platform of Diversity Charters was set up in 2010 and is funded by the European Commission.
[24: Platforma za listine o raznovrstnosti na ravni EU je bila vzpostavljena leta 2010, financira pa jo Evropska komisija.
This gap becomes wider with age, particularly as a result of the so-called motherhood penalty.
Ta razlika se s starostjo povečuje, zlasti kot posledica tako imenovane kazni za materinstvo.
The assessment of the national measures notified by the Member States revealed that the current national transparency measures in place are insufficient and not effective on their own.
Iz ocene nacionalnih ukrepov, ki so jih sporočile države članice, izhaja, da trenutni nacionalni ukrepi na področju preglednosti ne zadoščajo in sami po sebi niso učinkoviti.
Rising inequalities in the EU and their social, economic and political impacts.
Naraščanje neenakosti v EU ter njihovi družbeni, gospodarski in politični vplivi).