natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Citizens evaluated their level of knowledge of the EU assessment system for food safety and its regulatory framework as very good (22.64 %), good (33.65 %), sufficient (26.42 %), little (14.78 %) or none (2.52 %).
Državljani so ocenili svoje poznavanje sistema EU za ocenjevanje varnosti hrane in njegovega regulativnega okvira kot zelo dobro (22,64 %), dobro (33,65 %), zadovoljivo (26,42 %), slabo (14,78 %) ali neobstoječe (2,52 %).
83.7 % of replies from citizens and by 63.4 % from stakeholders stated that complementing industry studies with verification studies would strengthen EFSA's risk assessment to some or to a large extent.
83,7 % državljanov in 63,4 % zainteresiranih strani, ki so sodelovali v posvetovanju, je navedlo, da bi dopolnitev študij industrije s preveritvenimi študijami do neke mere ali v veliki meri okrepila oceno tveganja agencije EFSA.
Over 40 % of citizen replies disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement suggesting that MS are sufficiently involved in EFSA's work.
Več kot 40 % sodelujočih državljanov je odgovorilo, da se ne strinja ali nikakor ne strinja z izjavo, da so države članice dovolj vključene v delo agencije EFSA.
Organisations evaluated their level of knowledge as very good (37.25 %), good (47.06 %), sufficient (14.38 %), little (0.65 %) or none (0.65 %).
Organizacije so ocenile svoje poznavanje kot zelo dobro (37,25 %), dobro (47,06 %), zadovoljivo (14,38 %), slabo (0,65 %) ali neobstoječe (0,65 %).
Elements including EFSA being able to choose excellent and independent experts from a large pool of candidates, as well as its independence from risk managers (Commission and MS) and from industry, were found by over 80 % of respondents in both the citizen and stakeholder groups to be useful or very useful.
Elementi, ki vključujejo možnost, da agencija EFSA lahko izbere odlične in neodvisne strokovnjake iz širokega nabora kandidatov, ter njeno neodvisnost od odgovornih za upravljanje tveganja (Komisije in držav članic) in od industrije, so po mnenju več kot 80 % sodelujočih državljanov in zainteresiranih strani koristni ali zelo koristni.
Citizens and stakeholders found that publishing industry studies, including raw/aggregated data but excluding business secrets or other confidential information, has a positive or very positive impact on:
Državljani in zainteresirane strani menijo, da ima objavljanje študij industrije, vključno z neobdelanimi/zbirnimi podatki, razen poslovnih skrivnosti ali drugih zaupnih informacij, pozitiven ali zelo pozitiven učinek na:
Over 75 % of respondents from both groups considered it useful or very useful to avoid duplication of risk assessments between EU and national levels, and to ensure an appropriate level of resources for EFSA.
Po mnenju več kot 75 % vprašanih iz obeh skupin sta izogibanje podvajanju ocenjevanja tveganja na ravni EU in nacionalnih ravneh ter zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni sredstev za agencijo EFSA koristni ali zelo koristni.
In particular, industry stakeholders considered valuable to some or to a large extent the possibility for providing pre-submission advice to individual applicants, while consumer organisations and some other NGOs considered that it would not contribute very much.
Zlasti zainteresirane strani iz industrije so menile, da je možnost svetovanja posameznim vlagateljem pred vložitvijo vloge do neke mere ali v veliki meri pomembna, po mnenju združenj potrošnikov in nekaterih drugih nevladnih organizacij pa prispevek svetovanja ne bi bil zelo pomemben.
Both citizen and stakeholder replies to the OPC showed that an open registry of studies, the use of machine readable formats and having different levels of access to studies would be useful or very useful tools.
Po mnenju državljanov in zainteresiranih strani, ki so sodelovali v odprtem javnem posvetovanju, bi bili odprt register študij, uporaba strojno berljivih formatov in uporaba različnih ravni dostopa do študij koristna ali zelo koristna orodja.
Among citizens, 58.8 % considered that immediate publication without confidentiality checks would have a positive or very positive impact, 6.9 % consider it would have no impact and 28.9 % considered that the impact would be negative or very negative.
58,8 % sodelujočih državljanov je menilo, da bi imela takojšnja objava brez preverjanja zaupnosti pozitiven ali zelo pozitiven učinek, 6,9 % jih je menilo, da to ne bi imelo nikakršnega učinka, po mnenju 28,9 % sodelujočih državljanov pa bi bil učinek negativen ali zelo negativen.
In general, citizens found that all the additional measures regarding industry studies proposed in the OPC contribute to some or a large extent to strengthening EFSA's risk assessments; over 75 % of replies regarding the single measures acknowledged this.
Na splošno so državljani menili, da vsi dodatni ukrepi glede študij industrije, predlagani v odprtem javnem posvetovanju, do neke mere ali v veliki meri prispevajo k okrepitvi ocenjevanja tveganja agencije EFSA; to potrjuje več kot 75 % odgovorov glede posameznih ukrepov.
It was found that the tools currently available to support scientific cooperation between EFSA and MS to a significant extent already engage MS in the EU risk assessment system: over 70 % of respondents (both citizen and stakeholder groups) found that all the tools described contribute to some or a large extent.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da orodja, ki so trenutno na voljo za podporo znanstvenega sodelovanja med agencijo EFSA in državami članicami, v veliki meri že vključujejo države članice v sistem EU za ocenjevanje tveganja: več kot 70 % vprašanih (tako iz skupine državljanov kot iz skupine zainteresiranih strani) je menilo, da vsa opisana orodja do neke mere ali v veliki meri prispevajo k temu.
Replies on the other scenarios related to the timing of publication do not showed strong polarisation of opinions, with the exception of the option to not publish industry studies at all: 77.1 % of citizens state that this would have a negative or very negative impact, with only 4.1 % considering that it would have a positive or very positive impact.
Odgovori glede ostalih scenarijev v zvezi s časovnim okvirom objavljanja niso pokazali velikih razlik v mnenju, z izjemo možnosti, da se študije industrije sploh ne bi objavljale: 77,1 % sodelujočih državljanov je navedlo, da bi to imelo negativen ali zelo negativen učinek, samo 4,1 % pa jih je menilo, da bi to imelo pozitiven ali zelo pozitiven učinek.
Both citizens and stakeholders considered that allocating more public resources to financing food safety studies is important for strengthening EFSA's risk assessment: around 80 % of citizen replies state that EU or national funding could contribute to some or to a large extent; the figure for stakeholders is slightly lower.
Državljani in zainteresirane strani so menili, da je dodelitev več javnih sredstev za financiranje študij o varnosti hrane pomembna za okrepitev ocenjevanja tveganja agencije EFSA: približno 80 % sodelujočih državljanov je odgovorilo, da bi lahko financiranje EU ali nacionalno financiranje do neke mere ali v veliki meri prispevalo k temu; v primeru zainteresiranih strani pa je ta delež nekoliko nižji.
allowing scrutiny by other scientific and third parties: 81.8 % of replies from citizens, 80.4 % from stakeholders,
omogočanje pregleda drugim znanstvenim in tretjim osebam: 81,8 % odgovorov državljanov, 80,4 % odgovorov zainteresiranih strani,
[1: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/general_food_law/fitness_check_en ][2: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_glyphosate_eci_final.pdf ]
][2: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/plant/docs/pesticides_glyphosate_eci_final.pdf. ]
For stakeholders, 71.9 % believe that the non-publication of industry studies would have a negative or very negative impact and only 1.3 % considered that it would have a positive impact.
Po mnenju 71,9 % sodelujočih zainteresiranih strani bi imelo neobjavljanje študij industrije negativen ali zelo negativen učinek, le 1,3 % pa jih je menilo, da bi imelo pozitiven učinek.
enhancing the exchange of information on risk among interested parties: 81.5 % of replies from citizens, 76.5 % from stakeholders.
izboljšanje izmenjave informacij o tveganju med zainteresiranimi stranmi: 81,5 % odgovorov državljanov, 76,5 % odgovorov zainteresiranih strani.
strengthening consumer trust in the EU risk assessment system: 84.9 % of replies from citizens, 73.9 % from stakeholders,
okrepitev zaupanja potrošnikov v sistem EU za ocenjevanje tveganja: 84,9 % odgovorov državljanov, 73,9 % odgovorov zainteresiranih strani,
Some MS saw the potentially for a small value of pre-submission advice in relation to its cost vs benefit analysis.
Po mnenju nekaterih držav članic bi lahko imelo svetovanje pred vložitvijo vloge glede na analizo stroškov in koristi le majhno vrednost.
Most respondents (over 75 % in both the citizen and stakeholder groups) agreed or strongly agreed that an increased involvement of MS is important to ensure that EFSA has a large pool of experts from MS. MS authorities highlighted the importance of incentives when promoting cooperation.
Večina vprašanih (več kot 75 % sodelujočih državljanov in zainteresiranih strani) se je strinjala ali zelo strinjala, da je večja vključenost držav članic pomembna, da se zagotovi, da ima EFSA na voljo širok nabor strokovnjakov iz držav članic.
However, 27.7 % of citizen replies and 26.1 % of stakeholder replies disagree or strongly disagree with this statement.
Vendar se s to izjavo ni strinjalo ali nikakor ni strinjalo 27,7 % sodelujočih državljanov in 26,1 % sodelujočih zainteresiranih strani.
The possibility of choosing excellent and independent experts from a large pool of candidates scored higher, with 96.2 % of citizen replies and 98.7 % of stakeholder replies considering it useful or very useful.
Možnost izbire odličnih in neodvisnih strokovnjakov iz širokega nabora kandidatov pa se zdi koristna ali zelo koristna večjemu številu vprašanih, in sicer 96,2 % državljanom in 98,7 % zainteresiranim stranem.
enhancing the transparency of the EU risk assessment system: 87.4 % of replies from citizens, 91.5 % from stakeholders,
izboljšanje preglednosti sistema EU za ocenjevanje tveganja: 87,4 % odgovorov državljanov, 91,5 % odgovorov zainteresiranih strani,
[5: https://ec.europa.eu/food/expert-groups/ag-ap/adv-grp_fchaph/wg_2018_en ][6: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/events/event/180206 ][7: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/general_food_law/expert_group_en ][8: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/event/180214-m.pdf ]
][8: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/event/180214-m.pdf. ]
Citizens and stakeholders had the opportunity to provide feedback on a Commission roadmap from 20 December 2017 to 17 January 2018.
Državljani in zainteresirane strani so imeli priložnost predložiti povratne informacije glede časovnega načrta Komisije od 20. decembra 2017 do 17. januarja 2018. 20 zainteresiranih strani (15 trgovinskih in poslovnih združenj, štiri nevladne organizacije, en nacionalni organ) in en državljan so predložili povratne informacije.
The OPC showed such access as important or very important in 86.8 % of citizen replies and 88.2 % of stakeholder replies.
V odprtem javnem posvetovanju je 86,8 % sodelujočih državljanov in 88,2 % sodelujočih zainteresiranih strani odgovorilo, da je tak dostop pomemben ali zelo pomemben.
This proposal was meanwhile adopted and entered into force on 30 March.
Ta predlog je bil medtem sprejet in je začel veljati 30. marca.
Hence, it can only be of a temporary nature.
Zato je lahko le začasne narave.
A rigorous and conservative approach to financial management;
strog in konservativen pristop k finančnemu upravljanju;
It does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives sought by the instrument.
Ne presega tistega, kar je potrebno za doseganje ciljev instrumenta.
The Member State concerned should request support.
Zadevna država članica bi morala zaprositi za podporo.
This system will allow the Union to:
Ta sistem bo Uniji omogočil, da:
from candidate countries[11: Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidate countries from the Western Balkans.]
držav kandidatk[11: Države kandidatke in po potrebi potencialne države kandidatke z Zahodnega Balkana.]
From the beginning of the outbreak in the Union up until 30 March 2020, 334 396 cases and 22 209 deaths have been reported in the Member States.
Od začetka izbruha v Uniji do 30. marca 2020 je bilo v državah članicah sporočenih 334 396 primerov okužbe in 22 209 smrti.
It concerns an amount of up to EUR 100 billion.
Ta znaša največ 100 milijard EUR.
The Council has a broad margin of discretion for assessing whether the conditions of this legal basis are fulfilled.
Svet ima široko diskrecijsko pravico pri oceni, ali so pogoji te pravne podlage izpolnjeni.
Therefore, the United Kingdom should not participate in the financial assistance under this Regulation.
Zato Združeno kraljestvo ne bi smelo sodelovati pri finančni pomoči v skladu s to uredbo.
The probability of further transmission of COVID-19 in the Union is considered high.
Verjetnost nadaljnjega prenosa COVID-19 v Uniji se šteje za visoko.
Such a consultation also helps the Commission to properly evaluate the terms of the loan.
Tako posvetovanje bi Komisiji tudi pomagalo ustrezno oceniti pogoje posojila.
To that end, the Member State concerned shall provide the Commission with appropriate evidence.
V ta namen zadevna država članica Komisiji predloži ustrezne dokaze.
The Commission shall inform the Council when the Instrument becomes available.
Komisija obvesti Svet, ko je instrument na voljo.
DG BUDG is the policy area or budget title concerned.
GD BUDG je zadevno področje ali naslov v proračunu.
The Commission and the beneficiary Member State will conclude an implementation agreement.
Komisija in država članica upravičenka skleneta sporazum o izvajanju.
The global outbreak of that disease is evolving rapidly and it has been declared a pandemic by the WHO.
Svetovni izbruh te bolezni se hitro razvija, SZO pa ga je razglasila za pandemijo.
References to Member States in this Regulation shall not be understood as including the United Kingdom.
Sklicevanja na države članice v tej uredbi se ne razumejo, kot da vključujejo Združeno kraljestvo.
Possibilities to roll over debt.
možnosti obnovitve dolga.
The Economic and Financial Committee shall be kept informed of a refinancing or restructuring as referred to in paragraph 3.
Ekonomsko-finančni odbor je redno obveščen o refinanciranju ali prestrukturiranju iz odstavka 3.
Officials and temporary staff Issuance of securities in the capital markets (market analysis, prospectus, registration, investors relationship), management of proceeds, disbursements and reimbursements
Uradniki in začasni uslužbenci Izdaja vrednostnih papirjev na kapitalskih trgih (tržna analiza, prospekt, registracija, odnosi z vlagatelji), upravljanje prihodkov, izplačil in povračil
The Commission has also established a coordinating response team at political level, composed of the five Commissioners responsible for the most affected policies.
Komisija je ustanovila tudi skupino za usklajevanje odzivanja na politični ravni, ki jo sestavlja pet komisark in komisarjev, pristojnih za področja politike, ki jih ta kriza najbolj zadeva.
The maximum amount of financial assistance referred to in Article 3 shall not exceed EUR 100 000 000 000 for all Member States.
Najvišji znesek finančne pomoči iz člena 3 ne presega 100 000 000 000 EUR za vse države članice.
The rules of Article 220 of the Financial Regulation apply.
Uporabljajo se pravila iz člena 220 finančne uredbe.
Due to the urgency to prepare the proposal so that it can be adopted in a timely manner by the Council, a stakeholder consultation could not be carried out.
Zaradi nujne čimprejšnje priprave predloga, da bi ga Svet lahko pravočasno sprejel, posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi ni bilo mogoče izvesti.
from EFTA countries[10: EFTA: European Free Trade Association. ]
držav Efte[10: EFTA: Evropsko združenje za prosto trgovino. ]
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 122 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 122 Pogodbe,
As announced in the Communication of 13 March 2020, the Union also stands ready to support Member States where possible in alleviating the employment impact for individuals and the hardest hit sectors.
Kot je bilo napovedano v sporočilu z dne 13. marca 2020, je Unija, kjer je to mogoče, pripravljena podpreti države članice tudi pri ublažitvi učinka na zaposlenost za posameznike ter za najbolj prizadete sektorje.
[6: ABM: activity-based management; ABB: activity-based budgeting.]
[6: ABM: upravljanje po dejavnostih, ABB: oblikovanje proračuna po dejavnostih.]
The loans issued by the Union should therefore be financed by recourse to international capital markets.
Posojila, ki jih izda Unija, bi bilo zato treba financirati z uporabo mednarodnih kapitalskih trgov.
Contributions in the form of guarantees from Member States
Prispevki držav članic v obliki jamstev
[7: As referred to in Article 54(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.]
[7: Po členu 54(2)(a) oz. (b) finančne uredbe.]
The Commission has activated its general rapid alert system "ARGUS" for crisis coordination and the Crisis Coordination Committee meets regularly to coordinate the actions of all the relevant departments and services of the Commission and of the EU agencies.
Komisija je aktivirala splošni sistem za hitro opozarjanje (ARGUS) za krizno usklajevanje in odbor za krizno usklajevanje se redno sestaja, da usklajuje ukrepe vseh ustreznih oddelkov in služb Komisije ter agencij EU.
Member States shall be reimbursed for such additional contributions from recovered amounts.
Državam članicam se ti dodatni prispevki povrnejo iz izterjanih zneskov.
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing the coronavirus disease, named COVID-19 by the World Health Organisation (WHO), is a new strain of coronavirus not previously identified in humans.
(3) Koronavirus 2 hudega akutnega respiratornega sindroma (SARS-CoV-2), ki povzroča koronavirusno bolezen, ki jo je Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija (SZO) poimenovala COVID-19, je nov sev koronavirusa, ki prej pri ljudeh ni bil ugotovljen.
[This section should be filled in using the spreadsheet on budget data of an administrative nature (second document in annex to this financial statement) and uploaded to CISNET for interservice consultation purposes.]
[Ta oddelek se izpolni s preglednico o proračunskih podatkih upravne narave (drugi dokument v prilogi k tej oceni finančnih posledic) in prenesti na CISNET za namene posvetovanj med službami.]
The Union adopted on this legal basis Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of the Council of 11 May 2010 establishing a European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM).
Unija je v skladu s to pravno podlago sprejela Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010 z dne 11. maja 2010 o vzpostavitvi Evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo.
- appropriate measures can be taken by the Union to respond in a spirit of solidarity between Member States to a specific economic situation.
- Unija lahko sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, da se v duhu solidarnosti med državami članicami odzove na posebne gospodarske razmere,
The Commission shall establish the necessary arrangements for the administration of the loans with the ECB.
Komisija določi potrebne ureditve za upravljanje posojil skupaj z ECB.
Given the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak and the need for an urgent response to the consequences of that outbreak, this Regulation should enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
(16) Glede na vpliv izbruha COVID-19 in potrebo po nujnem odzivu na posledice tega izbruha bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropske unije -
Following the EU leaders' videoconferences on the response to the COVID-19 outbreak on 10, 17, and 26 March 2020, the Commission is further stepping up its response to the COVID-19 outbreak, on all fronts.
Komisija je po videokonferencah voditeljev EU o odzivu na izbruh COVID-19, ki so potekale 10., 17., in 26. marca 2020, na vseh področjih še okrepila svoj odziv na izbruh COVID-19.
Article 122(2) TFEU has been used once before.
Člen 122(2) PDEU je bil enkrat že uporabljen.
This Regulation shall not be applicable to and in the United Kingdom.
Ta uredba se ne uporablja za Združeno kraljestvo in v njem.
This act takes the form of a Regulation because the act creates a new specific and temporary instrument that could be used by any Member State and has to be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Ta akt je v obliki uredbe, saj vzpostavlja nov poseben in začasen instrument, ki bi ga lahko uporabila katera koli država članica ter mora biti v celoti zavezujoč in se neposredno uporabljati v vseh državah članicah.
Due to the urgent nature of the proposal, no impact assessment was carried out.
Zaradi nujne čimprejšnje priprave predloga ni bila opravljena nobena ocena učinka.
This legal basis prescribes that:
Ta pravna podlaga določa naslednje:
Such contributions would constitute external assigned revenue.
Taki prispevki bi pomenili zunanje namenske prejemke.
Article 122(2) TFEU can be used for any type of exceptional crisis event and is not confined to crises of a financial or financial stability nature only.
Člen 122(2) PDEU se lahko uporabi za vse vrste izrednih kriznih dogodkov in ni omejen le na finančne krize ali krize finančne stabilnosti.
The agreement shall set out the payment conditions.
V sporazumu so določeni pogoji glede plačila.
In this respect, the Commission has published a Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Investment Bank and the Eurogroup for a "coordinated economic response to the COVID-19 outbreak" on 13 March 2020.
V zvezi s tem je 13. marca 2020 objavila sporočilo Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu svetu, Svetu, Evropski centralni banki, Evropski investicijski banki in Euroskupini o usklajenem gospodarskem odzivu na izbruh COVID-19.
an assessment of the compliance by the Member State with the conditions referred to in Article 3;
(b) oceno, ali država članica izpolnjuje pogoje iz člena 3;
The present proposal comes in addition to another Union law instrument to provide support to Member States in case of emergencies, namely Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) ("Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002").
Ta predlog dopolnjuje drug instrument prava Unije za zagotavljanje podpore državam članicam v izrednih razmerah, in sicer Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba (ES) št. 2012/2002).
The geographical scope is also different because SURE is limited to Member States and does not extend to countries negotiating their accession to the Union.
Geografsko področje uporabe je prav tako različno, saj je instrument SURE omejen na države članice in ne zajema držav, ki se pogajajo o pristopu k Uniji.
The share of loans granted to the three Member States representing the largest share of loans granted shall not exceed 60% of the amount referred to in Article 5.
Delež posojil, odobrenih trem državam članicam, ki predstavljajo največji delež odobrenih posojil, ne presega 60 % zneska iz člena 5.
The Commission has also adopted a Temporary Framework for State aid to enable Member States to use the full flexibility foreseen under State aid rules to support their economies.
Komisija je sprejela začasni okvir za državno pomoč, da bi lahko države članice v celoti izkoristile prilagodljivost, predvideno s pravili o državni pomoči, za podporo svojim gospodarstvom.