natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission published annual assessment reports on the implementation of the EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies based on information from each Member State, NGOs, international organisations and the EU Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).
Komisija je na podlagi informacij posameznih držav članic, nevladnih organizacij, mednarodnih organizacij in Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice (FRA) objavila letna poročila o oceni izvajanja Okvira EU za nacionalne strategije vključevanja Romov.
[65: COM(2014) 6 final.][66: Regulation (EU) 2016/589 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013, OJ L 107, 22.4.2016, pp.
[65: COM(2014) 6 final.][66: Uredba (EU) 2016/589 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. aprila 2016 o evropski mreži služb za zaposlovanje (EURES), dostopu delavcev do storitev na področju mobilnosti in nadaljnjem povezovanju trgov dela ter o spremembi uredb (EU) št. 492/2011 in (EU) št. 1296/2013 (UL L 107, 22.4.2016, str.
[26: http://europa.eu/contact/]
[26: https://europa.eu/european-union/contact_sl.]
In Rüffer the Court of Justice of the European Union (the Court) clarified that Articles 18 and 21 TFEU (on free movement) preclude national rules which, in any legal proceedings brought before the courts of a specific territorial entity in a Member State, grant the right to use a language other than the official language only to citizens of that State domiciled in that territorial entity.
V zadevi Rüffer je Sodišče Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sodišče) pojasnilo, da člena 18 in 21 PDEU (o prostem gibanju) nasprotujeta nacionalni ureditvi, ki v katerem koli sodnem postopku pred sodišči v določeni ozemeljski enoti države članice priznava pravico do uporabe jezika, ki ni uradni jezik, le svojim državljanom, ki prebivajo v tej ozemeljski enoti.
Right to petition the European Parliament and to address the European Ombudsman (Articles 20(2)(d) and 24(2), (3) and (4) TFEU)
Pravica državljanov Unije, da na Evropski parlament naslovijo peticije in se obrnejo na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic (člen 20(2)(d) ter člen 24(2), (3) in (4) PDEU)
][10: Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, pp.
][10: Direktiva Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu (UL L 303, 2.12.2000, str.
[47: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/guide-free-mo-2013_en.pdf ]
[47: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/citizen/document/files/guide-free-mo-2013_sl.pdf.]
It concluded that all Member States had transposed the Directives, that the main remaining challenges were to raise awareness of the protection in place and to improve implementation and application in practice, and it underlined that strengthening the role of national equality bodies could be crucial to this.
V njem je ugotovila, da so vse države članice prenesle direktivi v nacionalno pravo in da so glavni preostali izzivi povečati ozaveščenost o obstoječi zaščiti ter izboljšati izvajanje in uporabo teh direktiv v praksi.
Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States (Articles 20(2)(a) and 21 TFEU)
Pravica do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic (člen 20(2)(a) in člen 21 PDEU)
[48: Cyprus, Italy, Malta and Spain.
[48: Ciper, Italija, Malta in Španija.
The Commission is in dialogue with another Member State which grants citizenship in return for investment alone.
Trenutno poteka dialog med Komisijo in drugo državo članico, v kateri se državljanstvo podeli že zgolj v zameno za naložbo.
In April 2014, a Directive to improve enforcement of workers' rights was adopted following a proposal made by the Commission in April 2013.
Po predlogu, ki ga je Komisija predložila aprila 2013, je bila aprila 2014 sprejeta direktiva za boljše uveljavljanje pravic delavcev.
[69: COM (2014) 221 final.][70: Decision 2016/344/EU on establishing a European Platform to enhance cooperation in tackling undeclared work, OJ L 65, 11.3.2016, pp.
[69: COM(2014) 221 final.][70: Sklep (EU) 2016/344 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 2016 o vzpostavitvi evropske platforme za okrepitev sodelovanja pri ukrepanju proti neprijavljenemu delu (UL L 65, 11.3.2016, str.
In Alokpa the Court stated that non-EU citizens who are the primary carers of an EU citizen child can reside with their child in the host Member State by virtue of Article 20 TFEU if such a refusal would deprive that EU citizen of effective enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by virtue of the status of EU citizenship.
Sodišče je v zadevi Alokpa navedlo, da lahko državljani tretjih držav, ki dejansko skrbijo za otroka, ki je državljan Unije, prebivajo z njim v državi članici gostiteljici v skladu s členom 20 PDEU, če bi taka zavrnitev državljanu Unije onemogočila dejansko izvrševanje bistvene vsebine pravic, ki so mu podeljene zaradi statusa državljana Unije.
[73: Recommendation 2013/142/EU on enhancing the democratic and efficient conduct of the elections to the European Parliament, OJ L 79, 21.3.2013, pp.
[73: Priporočilo Komisije 2013/142/EU z dne 12. marca 2013 o krepitvi demokratične in učinkovite izvedbe volitev v Evropski parlament (UL L 79, 21.3.2013, str.
5.2.4 Residence of non-EU family members of an EU citizen's in the Member State of nationality of that EU citizen
5.2.4 Prebivanje državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljana Unije, v državi članici, katere državljanstvo ima navedeni državljan Unije
[55: Council Regulation (EU) 1259/2010 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, OJ L 343, 29.12.2010, pp.
[55: Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 1259/2010 z dne 20. decembra 2010 o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo zakonske zveze in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti (UL L 343, 29.12.2010, str.
[64: Directive 2014/50/EU on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights, OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, pp.
[64: Direktiva 2014/50/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. aprila 2014 o minimalnih zahtevah za povečanje mobilnosti delavcev med državami članicami z izboljšanjem pridobivanja in ohranjanja pravic iz dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja (UL L 128, 30.4.2014, str.
[88: ECI register; http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/welcome.]
[88: Register evropskih državljanskih pobud, glej http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/welcome.?lg=sl.]
[59: Council Regulation 2201/2003/EC concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation 1347/2000/EC, OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
[59: Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1347/2000 (UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
5.2.3 Residence of non-EU family members of EU citizens in the host Member State
5.2.3 Prebivanje državljanov tretjih držav, ki so družinski člani državljanov Unije, v državi članici gostiteljici
Under Articles 20(2)(b) and 22 TFEU, all Union citizens residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals are entitled to vote and to stand as candidates in European Parliament and municipal elections in their Member State of residence, under the same conditions as that state's nationals.
V skladu s členom 20(2)(b) in členom 22 PDEU ima vsak državljan Unije, ki prebiva v državi članici, nima pa njenega državljanstva, pravico, da v tej državi voli in je voljen na volitvah v Evropski parlament in občinskih volitvah pod enakimi pogoji kakor državljani te države.
In Alokpa the Court stated that non-EU citizens who are the primary carers of an EU citizen child can reside with their child in the host Member State by virtue of Article 21 TFEU in so far as the EU citizen satisfies the conditions set out in the Free Movement Directive.
V zadevi Alokpa je navedlo, da lahko državljani tretjih držav, ki dejansko skrbijo za otroka, ki je državljan Unije, prebivajo z njim v državi članici gostiteljici v skladu s členom 21 PDEU, če državljan Unije izpolnjuje pogoje iz direktive o prostem gibanju.
][57: Commission Decision 2012/714/EU confirming the participation of Lithuania in enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, OJ L 323, 22.11.2012, pp.
][57: Sklep Komisije 2012/714/EU z dne 21. novembra 2012 o potrditvi priključitve Litve okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti (UL L 323, 22.11.2012, str.
][58: Commission Decision 2014/39/EU confirming the participation of Greece in enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation, OJ L 23, 28.1.2014, pp.
][58: Sklep Komisije 2014/39/EU z dne 27. januarja 2014 o potrditvi priključitve Grčije okrepljenemu sodelovanju na področju prava, ki se uporablja za razvezo in prenehanje življenjske skupnosti (UL L 23, 28.1.2014, str.
Making the life of crossborder families easier
Olajševanje življenja družin, katerih družinski člani živijo v različnih državah
][54: Commission Implementing Regulation 1329/2014 establishing the Forms referred to in Regulation 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession, OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, pp.
][54: Izvedbena uredba Komisije (EU) št. 1329/2014 z dne 9. decembra 2014 o obrazcih iz Uredbe (EU) št. 650/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb in sprejemljivosti in izvrševanju javnih listin v dednih zadevah ter uvedbi evropskega potrdila o dedovanju (UL L 359, 16.12.2014, str.
Right to vote and stand as a candidate in municipal and European Parliament elections (Articles 20(2)(b) and 22 TFEU)
Pravica državljana Unije, da voli in je voljen na občinskih volitvah in volitvah v Evropski parlament (člen 20(2)(b) in člen 22 PDEU)
[32: Case C-86/12 Alopka and others.]
[32: Zadeva C-86/12, Alokpa in drugi.]
The report concluded that all Member States had taken measures to transpose the Directive and establish the procedures and bodies for its implementation, and that the main challenge was to determine how Member States ensure that their administrative and judicial authorities and equality bodies systematically provide victims with full protection in practice.
Glavni izziv za države članice je zagotoviti, da njihovi upravni in sodni organi ter organi za enakost sistematično zagotavljajo celovito zaščito žrtvam v praksi.
[18: Case C-83/14 Chez. ]
[18: Zadeva C-83/14, ČEZ.]
[53: Regulation (EU) 650/2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession, OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, pp. 107-134.
[53: Uredba (EU) št. 650/2012 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. julija 2012 o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju odločb in sprejemljivosti in izvrševanju javnih listin v dednih zadevah ter uvedbi evropskega potrdila o dedovanju (UL L 201, 27.7.2012, str.
[21: Case C-86/12 Alopka and others. ]
[21: Zadeva C-86/12, Alokpa in drugi.]
[91: One of us (ECI register); http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/initiatives/finalised/details/2012/000005/it.
[91: Eden izmed nas (register evropskih državljanskih pobud), http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/initiatives/successful/details/2012/000005/sl.
[93: Stop vivisection (ECI register); http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/initiatives/successful/details/2012/000007][94: COM(2015) 3773 final]
[93: Stop vivisection (register evropskih državljanskih pobud), http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/initiatives/successful/details/2012/000007/sl.
POSSIBLE AMENDMENTS AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS
MOREBITNE SPREMEMBE IN DRUGE IZBOLJŠAVE
The infringement proceedings were therefore closed.
Postopki ugotavljanja kršitev so bili zato zaključeni.
However, in some Member States no such measures seem to have been taken.
Vendar se zdi, v nekaterih državah članicah da ni bil sprejet noben tak ukrep.
Many countries are facing financial constraints and are trying to ‘do more with less'.
Številne države se srečujejo s finančnimi omejitvami in poskušajo „narediti več z manj".
][5: The questionnaire focused on the practical implementation of the Directive and its effectiveness.
][5: Vprašalnik je bil usmerjen v praktično izvajanje Direktive in njeno učinkovitost.
Information on free movement rights is available in all countries.
Informacije o pravicah do prostega gibanja so na voljo v vseh državah.
It has also been developed further by the case-law of the European Court of Justice.
Nadalje je bila razvita tudi s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
This issue has been raised with most of the countries.
To vprašanje je izpostavila večina držav.
Proper functioning of the bodies
Pravilno delovanje organov
There are still significant differences between them in terms of their mandate, competences, structures and resources.
Med njimi pa še vedno obstajajo precejšnje razlike glede njihovih pooblastil, pristojnosti, struktur ter sredstev.
In 11 Member States several bodies have been designated.
V 11 državah članicah je bilo določenih več organov.
However, a lot remains to be done in practice to ensure the Directive's aims are attained.
Vendar je treba v praksi še veliko storiti, da bi bili cilji Direktive doseženi.
It only seeks to achieve more effective and uniform application and enforcement of existing rights.
Z njo se poskušata doseči le učinkovitejša in enotnejša uporaba ter izvrševanje obstoječih pravic.
Information about the implementation in practice of the provisions of Article 3 is very limited.
Informacije o izvajanju določb člena 3 v praksi so zelo omejene.
The free movement of workers is a fundamental freedom of citizens of the European Union and one of the pillars of the internal market.
Prosto gibanje delavcev je temeljna svoboščina državljanov Evropske unije in eden od stebrov notranjega trga.
A Eurobarometer survey shows that increasing numbers of citizens are more aware of their rights in the EU.
Raziskava Eurobarometra kaže, da se vse več državljanov zaveda svojih pravic v EU.
This information may also encourage mobile citizens to report cases of discrimination and defend their rights.
Te informacije lahko tudi spodbudijo mobilne državljane, da poročajo o primerih diskriminacije in zaščitijo svoje pravice.
The promotion of dialogue with social partners and NGOs (Article 5)
Spodbujanje dialoga s socialnimi partnerji in nevladnimi organizacijami (člen 5)
The implementation of the Directive was discussed at several meetings of the committees mentioned above between 2015 and 2018.
O izvajanju Direktive so na več sestankih obeh navedenih odborov razpravljali med letoma 2015 in 2018.
Other provisions (Article 7, recitals 15 and 28)
Druge določbe (člen 7 ter uvodni izjavi 15 in 28)
It should be noted that the information received varied considerably in terms of content and detail.
Opozoriti je treba, da so se prejete informacije precej razlikovale glede na vsebino in podrobnosti.
All those who replied stated that no legislative amendments are necessary at this stage and that efforts should be concentrated instead on properly implementing the current regulations.
Vsi tisti, ki so odgovorili, so navedli, da zakonodajne spremembe za zdaj niso potrebne in da bi bilo treba prizadevanja namesto tega usmeriti v pravilno izvajanje veljavnih predpisov.
Defence of rights (Article 3)
Varstvo pravic (člen 3)
Member States' legislative frameworks provide for the possibility of dialogue with stakeholders.
Zakonodajni okviri držav članic omogočajo dialog z deležniki.
This is the case in all Member States except Italy where trade unions appear to be able to engage in proceedings only in case of collective discriminations.
Tako je v vseh državah članicah razen v Italiji, kjer lahko sindikati sodelujejo v postopkih le v primeru kolektivnih diskriminacij.
However, the volume of amendments varied substantially - from one specific act (Malta, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal) to amendments of dozens of legal acts (Lithuania, Romania).
Vendar se je obseg sprememb precej razlikoval, od enega posameznega akta (Malta, Ciper, Grčija in Portugalska) do sprememb velikega števila pravnih aktov (Litva in Romunija).
In this regard, the Commission recalls its proposal to establish a European Labour Authority, presented as part of the Social Fairness Package on 13 March 2018.
Komisija v zvezi s tem opozarja na svoj predlog o ustanovitvi Evropskega organa za delo, ki ga je predstavila 13. marca 2018 v okviru svežnja za socialno pravičnost.
Mostly, this is ensured through procedural rules on non-discrimination in general that existed even before the Directive entered into force.
To je večinoma zagotovljeno s postopkovnimi pravili o nediskriminaciji na splošno, ki so obstajala že pred začetkom veljavnosti Direktive.
The aim of this proposal is to strengthen the fairness of cross-border labour mobility in Europe.
Cilj tega predloga je krepitev pravičnosti čezmejne mobilnosti delovne sile v Evropi.
However, to date information on how often bodies provide legal and/or other assistance is scarce.
Vendar so najnovejše informacije o tem, kako pogosto organi zagotavljajo pravno in/ali drugo pomoč, redke.
France has not provided the clarification requested about how it implements this provision.
Francija ni poslala zahtevanega pojasnila glede načina izvajanja te določbe.
So were the spouses' lack of knowledge of the local language.
Enako velja tudi za to, da zakonci ne znajo lokalnega jezika.
The Commission has also used information collected by its network of legal experts on the free movement of workers and social security coordination.
Komisija je uporabila tudi informacije, ki jih je zbrala njena mreža pravnih strokovnjakov za prosto gibanje delavcev in koordinacijo socialne varnosti.
This is particularly important where the Directive has been implemented by assigning additional tasks to existing bodies (paragraph 1 of Article 4 read in conjunction with recital 18).
To je zlasti pomembno, kadar se Direktiva izvaja tako, da obstoječim organom dodeljuje dodatne naloge (člen 4(1) v povezavi z uvodno izjavo 18).
Since November 2017, free movement bodies have been designated in all Member States, although in France, Italy and the United Kingdom this appointment has not been publicised in line with the requirements of Article 6(1).
Od novembra 2017 so bili v vseh državah članicah določeni organi za prosto gibanje, čeprav v Franciji, Italiji in Združenem kraljestvu to imenovanje ni bilo objavljeno v skladu z zahtevami iz člena 6(1).
In Austria and Belgium, the Directive is transposed through acts at both federal and regional levels.
V Avstriji in Belgiji je bila Direktiva v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesena z akti na zvezni in regionalni ravni.
Better provision of information at national level to Union workers and members of their family (Article 6)
Boljše zagotavljanje informacij delavcem Unije in njihovim družinskim članom na nacionalni ravni (člen 6)
Particular attention has to be paid to the independence of legal assistance provided to persons covered by the Directive.
Posebno pozornost je treba nameniti neodvisnosti pravne pomoči, zagotovljene osebam, zajetim v Direktivi.
The Commission has also consulted the members of the Advisory Committee on the Free Movement of Workers by sending them a detailed questionnaire (hereinafter 'the questionnaire') and, afterwards, the draft report.
Komisija se je posvetovala tudi s člani Svetovalnega odbora za prosto gibanje delavcev, tako da jim je poslala podrobni vprašalnik (v nadaljnjem besedilu: vprašalnik) in nato osnutek poročila.
It is important that information on obstacles, restrictions and discrimination is collected, assessed and disseminated publicly.
Informacije o oviranju, omejevanju in diskriminaciji je treba zbrati, oceniti in javno objaviti.
It appears that in Lithuania and Portugal protection is limited to labour relations only, so it does not protect, for example, jobseekers who potentially may be victimised by public authorities.
Zdi se, da je zaščita v Litvi in na Portugalskem omejena le na delovna razmerja, tako na primer ne ščiti iskalcev zaposlitve, ki bi jih morda lahko viktimizirali javni organi.
In some instances, information is scattered across many national websites, making it difficult to access and fragmented.
V nekaterih primerih so informacije razpršene po številnih nacionalnih spletiščih, zaradi česar so težko dostopne in razdrobljene.
Denmark, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom considered that their national legislation already complies with the Directive and that no further legislative measures are necessary.
Danska, Francija, Španija, Italija, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo so menili, da je njihova nacionalna zakonodaja že skladna z Direktivo in da dodatni zakonodajni ukrepi niso potrebni.
Body (or bodies) to promote equal treatment (Article 4)
Organ (ali organi) za spodbujanje enakega obravnavanja (člen 4)
Germany and Lithuania indicated that there have been cases where organisations have engaged in judicial/administrative procedures to support workers.
Nemčija in Litva sta poročali o primerih, v katerih so organizacije začele sodne/upravne postopke, da so podprle delavce.
In doing so, it will also make use of data gathered in the annual report on intra-EU mobility, which provides an overview of cross-border mobility within the EU and may reveal obstacles to it (see footnote 27).
Pri tem bo prav tako uporabljala podatke, zbrane v letnem poročilu o mobilnosti znotraj EU, ki vsebuje pregled čezmejne mobilnosti v EU, in morda odkrila ovire zanjo (glej opombo 27).
Most Member States made amendments to their national legislation.
Večina držav članic je spremenila nacionalno zakonodajo.
Nevertheless, the replies to the questionnaire suggest that the Directive has had a positive impact for all stakeholders.
Kljub temu pa izpolnjeni vprašalniki kažejo, da je Direktiva pozitivno vplivala na vse deležnike.
However, given the relatively high quality standards established by the Directive (paragraph 2), ensuring that such information is comprehensive, up to date, clear and available in several languages remains a challenge in most cases.
Glede na razmeroma visoke standarde kakovosti, določene v Direktivi (odstavek 2), pa je zagotavljanje, da bi bile take informacije celovite, najnovejše, jasne in na voljo v več jezikih, v večini primerov še vedno izziv.
These include Your Europe, SOLVIT, EURES, Enterprise Europe Network and the Point of Single Contact.
Mednje so vključene Tvoja Evropa, SOLVIT, EURES, Evropska podjetniška mreža in enotne kontaktne točke.
The Commission will keep monitoring the implementation of the Directive.
Komisija bo še naprej spremljala izvajanje Direktive.
Estonia referred to two complaints that were dealt with by non-judicial authorities in 2017.
Estonija je navedla dve pritožbi, ki so ju leta 2017 obravnavali izvensodni organi.
Only a few Member States unequivocally mentioned that they had allocated additional resources for the performance of the new tasks.
Le nekaj držav članic je jasno navedlo, da so za izvajanje novih nalog dodelile dodatna sredstva.