natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) The higher court shall issue an order to dismiss late or impermissible appeals, if this has not been already done by the court in the first instance.
(1) Višje sodišče s sklepom zavrže prepozno ali nedovoljeno pritožbo, če tega ni storilo sodišče prve stopnje.
(2) The higher court may uphold, repeal or amend the misdemeanour judgement.
(2) Višje sodišče lahko sodbo o prekršku potrdi, razveljavi ali spremeni.
(3) The higher court shall refuse an appeal as unfounded and issue a judgement upholding the judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the reasons for which the judgement is being challenged are not in place, and that there are no substantial violations of the provisions governing the proceedings to which the court must pay attention ex officio (Article 159).
(3) Višje sodišče zavrne pritožbo kot neutemeljeno in s sodbo potrdi sodbo sodišča prve stopnje, če ugotovi, da niso podani razlogi, zaradi katerih se sodba izpodbija in tudi ne takšne bistvene kršitve določb postopka, na katere je treba paziti po uradni dolžnosti (159. člen).
(4) The higher court shall grant the appeal and issue an order repealing the judgement issued by the court in the first instance, or repeal the judgement ex officio and return the case for retrial, if it finds that a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings, except for the cases specified in paragraphs 5 and 7 of this article, or if it finds that, due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, the court in the first instance must supplement the proceedings or institute new proceedings and adopt a new decision on the issue.
(4) Višje sodišče ugodi pritožbi in s sklepom razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ali jo razveljavi po uradni dolžnosti ter zadevo vrne v novo odločitev, če ugotovi, da je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku, razen v primerih iz petega in sedmega odstavka tega člena ali če spozna, da bi moralo zaradi zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja sodišče prve stopnje postopek dopolniti ali izvesti nov postopek ter znova odločiti o isti zadevi.
(5) If a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings referred to in points 6 and 8 of paragraph 1 of Article 155 of this Act, the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance may not be repealed, if the repeal for this reason would be to the detriment of the accused person only.
(5) Če je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku iz 6. in 8. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena tega zakona, se sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ne sme razveljaviti, če bi bila razveljavitev iz tega razloga samo v škodo obdolženca.
(6) The higher court shall issue an order to repeal the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance even if the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance is not challenged due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, if during the procedure of deciding the appeal a reasonable doubt emerges regarding the truthfulness of the decisive facts established in the misdemeanour judgement, due to which the court believes that a mistake has been made in the finding of facts or the facts have been established incompletely to the detriment of the accused person.
(6) Višje sodišče s sklepom razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje tudi, če sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje ni bila izpodbijana zaradi zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, če nastane pri odločanju o pritožbi precejšen dvom o resničnosti odločilnih dejstev, ki so bila ugotovljena v sodbi o prekršku, zaradi česar misli, da je bilo dejansko stanje zmotno in nepopolno ugotovljeno v obdolženčevo škodo.
The higher court shall also amend the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the considered circumstances must be assessed in a different manner within the framework of the determination of misdemeanour sanctions or deprivation of a pecuniary advantage.
Višje sodišče s sodbo spremeni sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje tudi, če spozna, da je treba pri odmeri sankcij za prekrške oziroma odvzemu premoženjske koristi drugače presojati upoštevane okoliščine.
(8) The higher court may also amend the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance if it finds that the court in the first instance made a mistake in assessing a document or other evidence which it did not take but on which it based its judgement.
(8) Višje sodišče lahko spremeni sodbo sodišča prve stopnje tudi takrat, kadar spozna, da je sodišče prve stopnje zmotno presodilo listine ali druge dokaze, ki jih ni samo izvedlo in je nanje oprlo sodbo.
(9) If the only reason for repealing the judgement issued by the court in the first instance is a mistake in the finding of facts, and only a different assessment of the already-established facts is required for a correct judgement, where at the same time no new evidence is required, the higher court shall not repeal the judgement issued by the court in the first instance, but shall act in accordance with paragraph 7 of this article.
(9) V primeru, ko je edini razlog za razveljavitev sodbe sodišča prve stopnje zmotno ugotovljeno dejansko stanje in je za pravilno ugotovitev potrebna samo drugačna presoja že ugotovljenih dejstev, ne pa tudi izvedba novih dokazov, višje sodišče sodbe sodišča prve stopnje ne razveljavi, ampak ravna po sedmem odstavku tega člena.
(10) If during its consideration of the appeal the higher court finds that the reasons for which it has issued a decision to the benefit of the accused person are also to another accused person&apos;s benefit, it shall act ex officio as if the other accused person has also lodged an appeal.
(10) Če višje sodišče pri reševanju pritožbe ugotovi, da so razlogi, zaradi katerih je izdalo odločbo v korist obdolženca, v korist tudi kakšnemu drugemu obdolžencu, ki se ni pritožil ali se ni pritožil v tej smeri, ravna po uradni dolžnosti, kakor da bi se bil pritožil tudi ta.
(11) If the appeal has been lodged only to the benefit of the accused person, the misdemeanour judgement may not be amended to the detriment of the accused person.
(11) Če je pritožba vložena samo v korist obdolženca, se sodba o prekršku ne sme spremeniti v njegovo škodo.
Partial repeal of a judgement
Delna razveljavitev sodbe
The higher court may repeal a judgement issued by the court in the first instance only partially, if specific parts of the judgement may be excluded without any effects on the correctness of the decision.
Višje sodišče sme razveljaviti sodbo sodišča prve stopnje samo deloma, če se dajo posamezni deli sodbe izločiti brez škode za pravilno odločitev.
Extended scope of an appeal
Razširjen obseg pritožbe
An appeal due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, or due to a violation of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour, lodged to the benefit of the accused person, shall also comprise an appeal against the decision on sanctions and deprivation of pecuniary advantage.
Pritožba zaradi zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja ali zaradi kršitve materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, podana v korist obdolženca, obsega tudi pritožbo zaradi odločitve o sankcijah in o odvzemu premoženjske koristi.
Performance of procedural acts on the basis of a warning
Oprava procesnih dejanj po opozorilu višjega sodišča
(2) Within the framework of the adoption of a new decision, the court in the first instance shall be bound to the prohibition laid down in paragraph 11 of Article 163 of this Act.
(2) Pri izreku nove odločbe je sodišče prve stopnje vezano na prepoved, ki je predpisana v enajstem odstavku 163. člena tega zakona.
Decisions by the higher court
Odločba višjega sodišča
(1) Decisions on appeals issued by the higher court shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the application of the provisions of Articles 135, 136 and 138 and paragraph 2 of Article 140 of this Act.
(1) Za odločbo višjega sodišča o pritožbi se smiselno uporabljajo določbe 135., 136. in 138. člena ter drugi odstavek 140. člena tega zakona.
(2) In the grounds for the decision the higher court shall assess all indications in the appeal and the indications of violations of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour which it observed ex officio.
(2) V obrazložitvi odločbe oceni višje sodišče navedbe pritožbe in navede kršitve materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, ki jih je upoštevalo po uradni dolžnosti.
(3) If the higher court repeals the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance due to substantial violations of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings, the grounds for the decision must include a specification of which provisions have been violated and the nature of an individual violation.
(3) Če višje sodišče razveljavi sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje zaradi bistvenih kršitev določb postopka o prekrških, je treba v obrazložitvi navesti, katere določbe so bile kršene in v čem je kršitev.
(4) If the misdemeanour judgement issued by the court in the first instance is repealed due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts, the decision must include a specification of the insufficiencies established in the finding of facts.
(4) Če se sodba o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje razveljavi zaradi zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, je treba navesti, v čem so pomanjkljivosti pri ugotovitvi dejanskega stanja.
Resolution of other appeals
Reševanje drugih pritožb
Pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, appeals against other decisions issued in accordance with this Act within the framework of ordinary court proceedings must also be resolved.
V skladu z določbami tega poglavja zakona je treba reševati tudi pritožbe zoper druge odločbe, izdane po tem zakonu v rednem sodnem postopku.
EXTRAORDINARY APPEAL
IZREDNO PRAVNO SREDSTVO
(1) A request for protection of legality may be lodged against any decision issued in the second instance or against any final decision, if this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour has been violated.
(1) Zahteva za varstvo zakonitosti se lahko vloži zoper vsako odločbo, izdano na drugi stopnji oziroma vsako pravnomočno odločbo, če je prekršen ta zakon ali predpis, ki določa prekršek.
(2) A request for protection of legality may be lodged by a public prosecutor ex officio, or at the initiative of a person who has the right to appeal against a misdemeanour judgement issued by a court in the first instance.
(2) Zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti lahko vloži državni tožilec po uradni dolžnosti ali na pobudo osebe, ki ima pravico do pritožbe zoper sodbo o prekršku sodišča prve stopnje.
Deciding on requests for protection of legality
Odločanje o zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti
Requests for protection of legality shall be decided upon by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia, i.e. by a senate of three judges, within the framework of a non-public session.
O zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti odloča Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije v senatu treh sodnikov na nejavni seji.
Mutatis mutandis applicability of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act governing the procedure applying to protection of legality
Smiselna uporaba določb zakona o kazenskem postopku za postopek za varstvo zakonitosti
The procedure applying to protection of legality shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act governing the procedure applying to protection of legality.
Glede postopka za varstvo zakonitosti se smiselno uporabljajo določbe zakona o kazenskem postopku o zahtevi za varstvo zakonitosti.
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUVENILES
POSTOPEK PROTI MLADOLETNIKOM
Applicability of provisions to proceedings against juveniles
Uporaba določb v postopku proti mladoletnikom
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to proceedings against persons who committed a misdemeanour as juveniles and who at the time of institution of the proceedings have not fulfilled 19 years of age.
Določbe tega poglavja se uporabljajo v postopku proti osebam, ki so storile prekršek kot mladoletniki, pa ob začetku postopka o prekršku še niso stare 19 let.
The other provisions of this Act shall also be used if they are not in contravention of the provisions of this Chapter.
Druge določbe tega zakona se uporabljajo, kolikor niso v nasprotju z določbami tega poglavja.
Authorities in proceedings against juveniles
Organi v postopku proti mladoletnikom
The authorities participating in proceedings against juveniles and other authorities and institutions from which reports and proposals are requested shall be obliged to take action expeditiously so that the proceedings are completed as soon as possible.
Organi, ki sodelujejo v postopku proti mladoletniku, ter drugi organi in zavodi, od katerih se zahtevajo poročila in predlogi, so dolžni hitro ukrepati, da bi se postopek čimprej dokončal.
Local jurisdiction
Krajevna pristojnost
Local jurisdiction over misdemeanour proceedings against juveniles shall be vested in the judge of the court or court department in whose territory the juvenile has permanent or temporary residence.
Za postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku je krajevno pristojen sodnik sodišča oziroma oddelka sodišča, na območju katerega mladoletnik stalno ali začasno prebiva.
Unified proceedings
Enoten postopek
If a person commits one misdemeanour as a juvenile and another one as an adult, unified proceedings shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions applying to adults.
Če je kdo storil en prekršek kot mladoleten, drugega pa kot polnoleten, se opravi enoten postopek po določbah, ki veljajo za polnoletne.
Exclusion of proceedings against juveniles
Izločitev postopka proti mladoletniku
(1) If a juvenile participates in a misdemeanour together with adult perpetrators, proceedings against him shall be excluded.
(1) Če je mladoletnik sodeloval pri prekršku skupaj s polnoletnimi storilci, se postopek proti njemu izloči.
(2) Proceedings against a juvenile may be unified with proceedings against adult perpetrators and conducted pursuant to the general provisions of this Act only if this is indispensable for the clarification of issues.
(2) Postopek proti mladoletniku se sme združiti s postopkom zoper polnoletne storilce in opraviti po splošnih določbah tega zakona samo, če je združitev postopka nujna za vsestransko razjasnitev stvari.
(3) If unified proceedings are conducted against a juvenile and adult perpetrators, the provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the juvenile at all times.
(3) Če se opravi enoten postopek proti mladoletniku in polnoletnim storilcem, se glede mladoletnika vselej uporabijo določbe tega poglavja.
Notification of the institution of proceedings against juveniles
Obvestitev o začetku postopka proti mladoletniku
(1) The court shall notify of the institution of proceedings against a juvenile the latter&apos;s parents, adoptive parent, foster parent or guardian of the juvenile, and the authorised social welfare body, except in the case where a fine up to a specific amount is prescribed for the misdemeanour.
(1) O začetku postopka o prekršku proti mladoletniku obvesti sodišče starše, posvojitelja, rejnika oziroma skrbnika mladoletnika ter pooblaščen organ socialnega varstva, razen v primeru, ko je globa za prekršek predpisana v določenem znesku.
(2) Within the framework of proceedings against juveniles the social welfare body shall have, in addition to the rights explicitly vested in it on the basis of this Chapter, the right to be notified of the developments of the proceedings, to put forward motions during the proceedings, and to draw attention to facts and evidence important for making the correct decision.
(2) V postopku proti mladoletnikom ima organ socialnega varstva poleg pravic, ki so mu izrecno dane v tem poglavju, tudi pravico seznaniti se s potekom postopka, dajati med postopkom predloge in opozarjati na dejstva in dokaze, ki so pomembni za pravilno odločbo.
Summoning a juvenile
Vabilo mladoletnika
(1) A juvenile shall be summoned by the court via his parents or legal representative, unless this is not possible because the court must act swiftly or due to other circumstances.
(1) Mladoletnika vabi sodišče po starših oziroma zakonitem zastopniku, razen če to ni mogoče, ker je treba hitro ravnati, ali zaradi drugih okoliščin.
(2) A juvenile may not be served a summons in such a manner as to affix it on the court&apos;s notice board.
(2) Mladoletniku se ne smejo vročiti pisanja na ta način, da bi se pritrdila na oglasno desko sodišča.
(3) Orally announced decisions must be submitted to a juvenile in the form of a true copy.
(3) Ustno naznanjene odločbe se morajo mladoletniku vselej vročiti v overjenem prepisu.
Exclusion of the public
Izključitev javnosti
(1) When misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile are decided upon in the form of an oral hearing, the public shall be excluded at all times.
(1) Kadar se odloča v postopku o prekršku proti mladoletniku na ustni obravnavi, se javnost vselej izključi.
(2) The judge of the court conducting misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile may permit that the oral hearing is attended by the persons responsible for caring for and educating the juvenile and scientific workers.
(2) Sodnik sodišča, ki vodi postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku, sme dovoliti, da so na ustni obravnavi navzoče osebe, ki se ukvarjajo z varstvom in vzgojo mladoletnika ter znanstveni delavci.
(3) The court conducting misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile may order that the juvenile be removed from the oral hearing in the taking of certain evidence.
(3) Sodišče, ki vodi postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku, sme odrediti, naj se mladoletnik med izvedbo posameznih dokazov odstrani z ustne obravnave.
Compulsory examination
Obvezno zaslišanje
(1) Within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile, a misdemeanour judgement or misdemeanour order may not be issued without the juvenile having been examined first.
(1) V postopku proti mladoletniku se sodba oziroma sklep o prekršku ne moreta izdati brez njegovega zaslišanja.
(2) During procedural acts attended by a juvenile, and particularly during his examination, the court conducting the proceedings must act tactfully and take into account the juvenile&apos;s level of mental development, sensitivity and other personality traits in order to prevent that the proceedings have harmful effects on his development.
(2) Pri procesnih dejanjih, pri katerih je mladoletnik navzoč, zlasti pa pri njegovem zaslišanju, mora sodišče, ki vodi postopek, ravnati obzirno in upoštevati mladoletnikovo duševno razvitost, občutljivost in osebne lastnosti, da ne bi postopek škodljivo vplival na njegov razvoj.
Duty to testify
Dolžnost pričevanja
No one may be exempt from the duty to testify on the circumstances required for assessing the juvenile&apos;s level of mental development and for the comprehension of his personality and conditions in which he lives.
Nihče ne more biti oproščen dolžnosti pričevanja o okoliščinah, ki so potrebne za presojo mladoletnikove duševne razvitosti, ter za spoznanje njegove osebnosti in razmer, v katerih živi.
Establishment of circumstances
Ugotavljanje okoliščin
(1) In addition to the facts applying to the misdemeanour, misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile must establish the juvenile&apos;s age and the circumstances required for assessing the juvenile&apos;s level of mental development, investigate the environment and conditions in which the juvenile lives, and establish the other circumstances regarding his personality.
(1) V postopku o prekršku proti mladoletniku je treba poleg dejstev, ki se nanašajo na prekršek, zlasti ugotoviti mladoletnikovo starost in okoliščine, ki so potrebne za presojo njegove duševne razvitosti, preučiti okolje in razmere, v katerih mladoletnik živi ter druge okoliščine, ki zadevajo njegovo osebnost.
(2) In order to establish these circumstances, the court must examine the juvenile&apos;s parents, guardians and other persons who can give information on these circumstances.
(2) Da se ugotovijo te okoliščine, je treba zaslišati mladoletnikove starše, njegove skrbnike in druge, ki lahko dajo o njih potrebne podatke.
If necessary, a report shall be requested to be submitted by the authorised social welfare authority on these circumstances.
O teh okoliščinah se zahteva po potrebi poročilo pooblaščenega organa socialnega varstva.
Rights during proceedings
Pravice v postopku
In addition to the rights explicitly vested in them on the basis of this Chapter, during misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile the authorised social welfare body and parents, adoptive parent, foster parent and guardian of the juvenile shall have the right to be notified of the developments of the proceedings, to put forward motions, and draw attention to facts and evidence important for making the correct decision.
V postopku o prekršku proti mladoletniku imajo pooblaščeni organ socialnega varstva in starši, posvojitelj, rejnik in skrbnik mladoletnika poleg pravic, ki so jim izrecno dane v tem poglavju, tudi pravico, seznaniti se s potekom postopka, dajati med postopkom predloge in opozarjati na dejstva in dokaze, ki so pomembni za pravilno odločitev.
Suspension of proceedings
Mirovanje postopka
If during proceedings it is established that the juvenile has not yet fulfilled 14 years of age at the time when he committed the misdemeanour, the proceedings shall be suspended and the authorised social welfare body shall be notified thereof.
Če se med postopkom ugotovi, da mladoletnik ob storitvi prekrška še ni bil star 14 let, se postopek ustavi in o tem obvesti pooblaščen organ socialnega varstva.
Decision not to institute proceedings
Odločitev, da se postopek ne začne
(1) The court may decide not to institute proceedings against a juvenile although there is evidence that the juvenile committed the misdemeanour if, taking into account the nature of the misdemeanour and circumstances under which it was committed, it finds that it would not be expedient to institute proceedings against him.
(1) Sodnik lahko odloči, da ne bo začel postopka proti mladoletniku, čeprav so dokazi, da je mladoletnik storil prekršek, če glede na naravo prekrška in okoliščine, v katerih je bil prekršek storjen, spozna, da postopek proti njemu ne bi bil smotrn.
(2) The judge conducting the misdemeanour proceedings against a juvenile may issue an order to suspend the proceedings if during the proceedings he finds that it would not be expedient to impose a sanction.
(2) Sodnik, ki vodi postopek o prekršku proti mladoletniku, lahko s sklepom ustavi postopek, če med postopkom spozna, da mladoletniku ne bi bilo smotrno izreči sankcije.
To this end, he may request a report from the juvenile&apos;s parents or guardian, and from other persons and institutions.
V ta namen lahko zahteva poročila od mladoletnikovih staršev oziroma skrbnika ter od drugih oseb in ustanov.
(3) In the case referred to in paragraph 1 of this article, the accusation petition shall be refused on the basis of an order.
(3) V primeru iz prvega odstavka tega člena se obdolžilni predlog s sklepom zavrne.
The order on refusing the accusation petition and the order on suspending the proceedings referred to in the preceding paragraph shall also be submitted to the authorised social welfare body and juvenile&apos;s parents or guardian so that the latter can take all necessary measures in accordance with their rights and obligations.
Sklep o zavrnitvi predloga in sklep o ustavitvi postopka iz prejšnjega odstavka se dostavi tudi pooblaščenemu organu socialnega varstva in mladoletnikovim staršem oziroma skrbniku, da storijo potrebne ukrepe v skladu z njihovimi pravicami in dolžnostmi.
(4) A juvenile shall be served decisions via his parents.
(4) Mladoletniku se odločbe vročajo po starših.
Content of decisions
Vsebina odločbe