natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b. declare it admissible and render at the same time a judgment on the merits, if the underlying question in the case, concerning the interpretation or the application of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, is already the subject of well-established case-law of the Court.
b. odloči, da je sprejemljiva za obravnavo in hkrati izda sodbo o zadevi sami, če je temeljno vprašanje v tej zadevi, ki se nanaša na razlago ali uporabo Konvencije ali njenih protokolov, že del uveljavljene sodne prakse Sodišča.
Decisions and judgments under paragraph 1 shall be final.
Odločitve in sodbe iz prvega odstavka so dokončne.
If the judge elected in respect of the High Contracting Party concerned is not a member of the committee, the committee may at any stage of the proceedings invite that judge to take the place of one of the members of the committee, having regard to all relevant factors, including whether that Party has contested the application of the procedure under paragraph 1.b.”
Kadar sodnik, izvoljen za zadevno visoko pogodbenico, ni član odbora, ga lahko odbor v kateri koli fazi postopka povabi, da zasede mesto enega od članov odbora ob upoštevanju vseh ustreznih dejavnikov, vključno s tem, ali je ta pogodbenica izpodbijala uporabo postopka iz točke b prvega odstavka.«
Paragraph 1 shall be amended to read as follows:
Prvi odstavek se spremeni tako, da se glasi:
“If no decision is taken under Article 27 or 28, or no judgment rendered under Article 28, a Chamber shall decide on the admissibility and merits of individual applications submitted under Article 34. The decision on admissibility may be taken separately.”
»Kadar se ne sprejme odločitev v skladu s 27. ali 28. členom ali ne izda sodba v skladu z 28. členom, senat odloči o sprejemljivosti za obravnavo in vsebini posameznih zahtev za obravnavo, predloženih v skladu s 34. členom. Odločitev o sprejemljivosti za obravnavo se lahko sprejme ločeno.«
At the end of paragraph 2 a new sentence shall be added which shall read as follows:
Na koncu drugega odstavka se doda nov stavek, ki se glasi:
“The decision on admissibility shall be taken separately unless the Court, in exceptional cases, decides otherwise.”
»Odločitev o sprejemljivosti za obravnavo se sprejme ločeno, razen če Sodišče v izjemnih primerih ne odloči drugače.«
Paragraph b shall become paragraph c and a new paragraph b shall be inserted and shall read as follows:
Točka b postane točka c in doda se nova točka b, ki se glasi:
“b. decide on issues referred to the Court by the Committee of Ministers in accordance with Article 46, paragraph 4; and”.
»odloča o vprašanjih, ki jih je Sodišču v skladu s četrtim odstavkom 46. člena predložil Odbor ministrov, in«.
At the end of paragraph 1, a comma and the number 46 shall be inserted after the number 34.
Na koncu prvega odstavka se za številko 34 dodata vejica in številka 46.
Paragraph 3 of Article 35 of the Convention shall be amended to read as follows:
Tretji odstavek 35. člena Konvencije se spremeni tako, da se glasi:
The Court shall declare inadmissible any individual application submitted under Article 34 if it considers that:
Sodišče odloči, da posamezna zahteva za obravnavo, predložena v skladu s 34. členom, ni sprejemljiva za obravnavo, če meni:
a. the application is incompatible with the provisions of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, manifestly ill-founded, or an abuse of the right of individual application; or
a. da ni v skladu z določbami konvencije ali njenih protokolov, da je očitno neutemeljena ali da pomeni zlorabo pravice do posamezne zahteve za obravnavo, ali
b. the applicant has not suffered a significant disadvantage, unless respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto requires an examination of the application on the merits and provided that no case may be rejected on this ground which has not been duly considered by a domestic tribunal.”
b. da za vlagatelja ni nastal znatno neugodnejši položaj, razen če spoštovanje človekovih pravic, opredeljenih v Konvenciji in njenih protokolih, ne zahteva obravnave vsebine zahteve in če na tej podlagi ni mogoče zavrniti nobene zadeve, ki je ni že prej ustrezno obravnavalo domače sodišče.«
A new paragraph 3 shall be added at the end of Article 36 of the Convention, which shall read as follows:
Na koncu 36. člena Konvencije se doda nov tretji odstavek, ki se glasi:
In all cases before a Chamber or the Grand Chamber, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights may submit written comments and take part in hearings.”
Komisar za človekove pravice Sveta Evrope lahko k vsem zadevam, ki jih obravnava senat ali veliki senat, predloži pisne pripombe in sodeluje na obravnavah.«
Article 38 of the Convention shall be amended to read as follows:
38. člen Konvencije se spremeni tako, da se glasi:
Examination of the case
Obravnava zadeve
The Court shall examine the case together with the representatives of the parties and, if need be, undertake an investigation, for the effective conduct of which the High Contracting Parties concerned shall furnish all necessary facilities.”
Sodišče obravnava zadevo skupaj s predstavniki strank in po potrebi izvede preiskavo, zadevne visoke pogodbenice pa zagotovijo vse potrebno za njeno učinkovito izvedbo.«
Friendly settlements
Prijateljske poravnave
At any stage of the proceedings, the Court may place itself at the disposal of the parties concerned with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the matter on the basis of respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto.
Sodišče lahko v kateri koli fazi postopka izrazi pripravljenost, da je na voljo zadevnim strankam, da dosežejo prijateljsko poravnavo v zadevi na podlagi spoštovanja človekovih pravic, opredeljenih v konvenciji in njenih protokolih.
Proceedings conducted under paragraph 1 shall be confidential.
Postopki, ki se vodijo v skladu s prvim odstavkom, so zaupni.
This decision shall be transmitted to the Committee of Ministers, which shall supervise the execution of the terms of the friendly settlement as set out in the decision.”
Odločba se pošlje Odboru ministrov, ki nadzira izvajanje določil prijateljske poravnave, navedene v odločbi.«
If the Committee of Ministers considers that the supervision of the execution of a final judgment is hindered by a problem of interpretation of the judgment, it may refer the matter to the Court for a ruling on the question of interpretation.
Če Odbor ministrov meni, da nadziranje izvršitve končne sodbe ovirajo težave pri razlagi sodbe, lahko zadevo predloži Sodišču, da se izreče o razlagi.
A referral decision shall require a majority vote of two thirds of the representatives entitled to sit on the Committee.
Za odločitev o predložitvi je potrebna dvotretjinska večina glasov predstavnikov, upravičenih do sedeža v odboru.
If the Committee of Ministers considers that a High Contracting Party refuses to abide by a final judgment in a case to which it is a party, it may, after serving formal notice on that Party and by decision adopted by a majority vote of two thirds of the representatives entitled to sit on the Committee, refer to the Court the question whether that Party has failed to fulfil its obligation under paragraph 1.
Če Odbor ministrov meni, da visoka pogodbenica zavrača spoštovanje končne sodbe v zadevi, v kateri je stranka, lahko po tem, ko ji je bilo vročeno uradno obvestilo in z odločitvijo, sprejeto z dvotretjinsko večino glasov predstavnikov, upravičenih do sedeža v odboru, Sodišču predloži vprašanje, ali pogodbenica ni izpolnila svoje obveznosti iz prvega odstavka.
If the Court finds a violation of paragraph 1, it shall refer the case to the Committee of Ministers for consideration of the measures to be taken.
Če sodišče ugotovi kršitev prvega odstavka, zadevo predloži Odboru ministrov, ki odloči o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti.
If the Court finds no violation of paragraph 1, it shall refer the case to the Committee of Ministers, which shall close its examination of the case.”
Če sodišče ne ugotovi kršitve prvega odstavka, zadevo predloži Odboru ministrov, ki konča obravnavo zadeve.
A new paragraph 2 shall be inserted which shall read as follows:
Doda se nov drugi odstavek, ki se glasi:
The European Union may accede to this Convention.”
Evropska unija lahko pristopi h Konvenciji.«
Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall become paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 respectively.
Drugi, tretji in četrti odstavek postanejo tretji, četrti oziroma peti odstavek.
This Protocol shall be open for signature by member States of the Council of Europe signatories to the Convention, which may express their consent to be bound by
Protokol je na voljo za podpis državam članicam Sveta Evrope podpisnicam konvencije, ki lahko izrazijo svoje soglasje, da jih zavezuje
a. signature without reservation as to ratification, acceptance or approval; or
a) podpis brez pridržka glede ratifikacije, sprejema ali odobritve ali
b. signature subject to ratification, acceptance or approval, followed by ratification, acceptance or approval.
b) s podpisom ob pridržku, da bo začel zanje veljati šele po ratifikaciji, sprejemu ali odobritvi, ki mu sledi ratifikacija, sprejem ali odobritev.
The instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Secretary General of the Council of Europe.
Listine o ratifikaciji, sprejetju ali odobritvi se deponirajo pri generalnem sekretarju Sveta Evrope.
From the date of the entry into force of this Protocol, its provisions shall apply to all applications pending before the Court as well as to all judgments whose execution is under supervision by the Committee of Ministers.
Od dneva začetka veljavnosti protokola se njegove določbe uporabljajo za vse zahteve, ki jih Sodišče obravnava, ter za vse sodbe, katerih izvršitev nadzira Odbor ministrov.
The new admissibility criterion inserted by Article 12 of this Protocol in Article 35, paragraph 3.b of the Convention, shall not apply to applications declared admissible before the entry into force of the Protocol.
Novo merilo sprejemljivosti za obravnavo, ki se z 12. členom protokola doda točki b tretjega odstavka 35. člena Konvencije, se ne uporablja za zahteve, ki so bile sprejete v obravnavo že pred začetkom veljavnosti protokola.
In the two years following the entry into force of this Protocol, the new admissibility criterion may only be applied by Chambers and the Grand Chamber of the Court.
V dveh letih po začetku veljavnosti protokola lahko novo merilo sprejemljivosti uporabljajo le senati in veliki senat Sodišča.
The term of office of judges serving their first term of office on the date of entry into force of this Protocol shall be extended ipso jure so as to amount to a total period of nine years.
Mandat sodnikov, ki na dan začetka veljavnosti tega protokola opravljajo svoj prvi mandat, se ipso iure podaljša, tako da v celoti traja devet let.
The other judges shall complete their term of office, which shall be extended ipso jure by two years.
Drugi sodniki končajo svoj mandat, ki se ipso iure podaljša za dve leti.
b. the deposit of any instrument of ratification, acceptance or approval;
b) o deponiranju vsake listine o ratifikaciji, sprejemu ali odobritvi;
c. the date of entry into force of this Protocol in accordance with Article 19; and
c. datumu začetka veljavnosti tega protokola v skladu z 19. členom in
d. any other act, notification or communication relating to this Protocol.
d) o vsakem drugem dokumentu, obvestilu ali sporočilu, ki se nanaša na ta Protokol.
PROTOCOL established by the Council in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union
PROTOKOL h Konvenciji o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije, ki jo je Svet pripravil na podlagi 34. člena Pogodbe o Evropski uniji
THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES to this Protocol, Member States of the European Union,
VISOKE POGODBENICE tega protokola, države članice Evropske unije, SO SE
REFERRING to the Council Act of 16 October 2001 establishing the Protocol to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union,
OB SKLICEVANJU na Akt Sveta z dne 16. oktobra 2001 o pripravi Protokola h Konvenciji o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije,
TAKING ACCOUNT of the conclusions adopted at the European Council held in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999, and of the need to implement them immediately in order to achieve an area of freedom, security and justice,
OB UPOŠTEVANJU sklepov, sprejetih na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999, in potrebe po njihovem takojšnjem izvajanju za vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
BEARING IN MIND the recommendations made by the experts when presenting the mutual evaluation reports based on Council Joint Action 97/827/JHA of 5 December 1997 establishing a mechanism for evaluating the application and implementation at national level of international undertakings in the fight against organised crime(*1),
OB UPOŠTEVANJU priporočil izvedencev ob predložitvi medsebojnih ocenjevalnih poročil na podlagi Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 97/827/PNZ z dne 5. decembra 1997, ki na nacionalni ravni vzpostavljajo mehanizem za ocenjevanje uresničevanja in izvajanja mednarodnih obveznosti(*1) v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu,
CONVINCED of the need for additional measures in the field of mutual assistance in criminal matters for the purpose of the fight against crime, including in particular organised crime, money laundering and financial crime,
PREPRIČANE, da je treba v boju proti kriminalu, zlasti organiziranemu, pranju denarja in finančnemu kriminalu na področju medsebojne pravne pomoči v kazenskih zadevah sprejeti dodatne ukrepe,
HAVE AGREED UPON THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS, which shall be annexed to, and form an integral part of, the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union of 29 May 2000 (*2), hereinafter referred to as the &quot;2000 Mutual Assistance Convention&quot;:
DOGOVORILE O NASLEDNJIH DOLOČBAH, ki so priložene Konvenciji o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije z dne 29. maja 2000(*2), v nadaljevanju »Konvencija o medsebojni pravni pomoči iz leta 2000«, in so njen sestavni del:
Request for information on bank accounts
Zaprosilo za podatke o bančnih računih
Each Member State shall, under the conditions set out in this Article, take the measures necessary to determine, in answer to a request sent by another Member State, whether a natural or legal person that is the subject of a criminal investigation holds or controls one or more accounts, of whatever nature, in any bank located in its territory and, if so, provide all the details of the identified accounts.
Vsaka država članica pod pogoji iz tega člena sprejme v odgovor na zaprosilo druge države članice vse potrebne ukrepe za ugotavljanje, ali ima ali upravlja fizična ali pravna oseba, proti kateri je uvedena preiskava zaradi kaznivega dejanja, enega ali več računov katere koli vrste in pri kateri koli banki na njenem ozemlju, in če taki računi obstajajo, priskrbi vse podatke o ugotovljenih računih.
The information shall also, if requested and to the extent that it can be provided within a reasonable time, include accounts for which the person that is the subject of the proceedings has powers of attorney.
Podatki, če se zanje zaprosi in se lahko pridobijo v razumnem roku, vključujejo tudi račune, za katere je oseba, proti kateri teče postopek, pooblaščena.
The obligation set out in this Article shall apply only to the extent that the information is in the possession of the bank keeping the account.
Obveznost, ki je določena v tem členu, se uporablja samo, če ima te podatke banka, ki vodi račun.
The obligation set out in this Article shall apply only if the investigation concerns:
Obveznost iz tega člena se uporablja samo, če se preiskava nanaša na:
an offence punishable by a penalty involving deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum period of at least four years in the requesting State and at least two years in the requested State, or
kaznivo dejanje, za katero je zagrožena kazen odvzema prostosti ali je mogoče odrediti drug ukrep, ki omejuje prostost, za vsaj štiri leta v državi prosilki in vsaj dve leti v zaprošeni državi, ali
an offence referred to in Article 2 of the 1995 Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), or in the Annex to that Convention, as amended, or
kaznivo dejanje iz 2. člena Konvencije o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada iz leta 1995 (Konvencije o Europolu) ali priloge k navedeni konvenciji, kot je bila spremenjena, ali
to the extent that it may not be covered by the Europol Convention, an offence referred to in the 1995 Convention on the Protection of the European Communities&apos; Financial Interests, the 1996 Protocol thereto, or the 1997 Second Protocol thereto.
kaznivo dejanje, navedeno v Konvenciji o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1995, Protokolu k navedeni konvenciji iz leta 1996 ali Drugem protokolu k navedeni konvenciji iz leta 1997, če ni vključeno v Konvenciji o Europolu.
The authority making the request shall, in the request:
Organ, ki zaprosi, v zaprosilu navede:
state why it considers that the requested information is likely to be of substantial value for the purpose of the investigation into the offence,
razloge, zaradi katerih meni, da so zaprošeni podatki verjetno bistvenega pomena za preiskavo kaznivega dejanja,
state on what grounds it presumes that banks in the requested Member State hold the account and, to the extent available, which banks may be involved,
na podlagi česa predvideva, da banke v zaprošeni državi vodijo navedeni račun, in če je mogoče, katere so te banke,
include any information available which may facilitate the execution of the request.
vse podatke, ki jih ima na voljo, in bi lahko olajšali izvršitev zaprosila.
Member States may make the execution of a request according to this Article dependent on the same conditions as they apply in respect of requests for search and seizure.
Za izvršitev zaprosila v skladu s tem členom lahko države članice določijo enake pogoje, kot se uporabljajo v zvezi z zaprosili za preiskavo in zaseg.
The Council may decide, pursuant to Article 34(2)(c) of the Treaty of European Union, to extend the scope of paragraph 3.
Svet lahko na podlagi točke (c) drugega odstavka 34. člena Pogodbe o Evropski uniji odloči o razširitvi področja uporabe tretjega odstavka.
Requests for information on banking transactions
Zaprosila za podatke o bančnih transakcijah
On request by the requesting State, the requested State shall provide the particulars of specified bank accounts and of banking operations which have been carried out during a specified period through one or more accounts specified in the request, including the particulars of any sending or recipient account.
Na zaprosilo države prosilke zaprošena država pošlje podatke o določenih bančnih računih in bančnih transakcijah, ki so se v določenem obdobju opravljale prek enega ali več računov, navedenih v zaprosilu, vključno s podatki o vseh računih, s katerih ali na katere je bilo opravljeno nakazilo.
The obligation set out in this Article shall apply only to the extent that the information is in the possession of the bank holding the account.
Obveznost iz tega člena se uporablja samo, če ima banka, ki vodi račun, podatke.
The requesting Member State shall in its request indicate why it considers the requested information relevant for the purpose of the investigation into the offence.
Država prosilka v zaprosilu navede, zakaj meni, da so zaprošeni podatki pomembni za preiskavo kaznivega dejanja.
Requests for the monitoring of banking transactions
Zaprosila za spremljanje bančnih transakcij
Each Member State shall undertake to ensure that, at the request of another Member State, it is able to monitor, during a specified period, the banking operations that are being carried out through one or more accounts specified in the request and communicate the results thereof to the requesting Member State.
Vse države članice se zavežejo, da bodo zagotovile, da lahko na zaprosilo druge države članice v določenem obdobju spremljajo bančne transakcije, ki se opravljajo prek enega ali več računov, navedenih v zaprosilu, in o ugotovitvah obvestijo državo prosilko.
The decision to monitor shall be taken in each individual case by the competent authorities of the requested Member State, with due regard for the national law of that Member State.
Odločitev o spremljanju bančnih transakcij sprejmejo pristojni organi zaprošene države za vsak primer posebej ob upoštevanju njene nacionalne zakonodaje.
The practical details regarding the monitoring shall be agreed between the competent authorities of the requesting and requested Member States.
O praktičnih podrobnostih v zvezi s spremljanjem se sporazumejo pristojni organi države prosilke in zaprošene države.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that banks do not disclose to the bank customer concerned or to other third persons that information has been transmitted to the requesting State in accordance with Articles 1, 2 or 3 or that an investigation is being carried out.
Vsaka država članica sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovi, da banke svojim strankam ali tretjim osebam ne razkrijejo, da so državi prosilki poslale podatke v skladu s 1., 2. ali 3. členom ali da preiskava poteka.
If the competent authority of the requested Member State in the course of the execution of a request for mutual assistance considers that it may be appropriate to undertake investigations not initially foreseen, or which could not be specified when the request was made, it shall immediately inform the requesting authority accordingly in order to enable it to take further action.
Če pristojni organ zaprošene države med izvrševanjem zaprosila za medsebojno pravno pomoč meni, da bi bilo treba opraviti preiskave, ki prvotno niso bile predvidene ali jih v času zaprosila ni bilo mogoče navesti, o tem takoj obvesti organ države prosilke, da mu omogoči nadaljnje ukrepanje.
Additional requests for mutual assistance
Dodatna zaprosila za medsebojno pravno pomoč
Where the competent authority of the requesting Member State makes a request for mutual assistance which is additional to an earlier request, it shall not be required to provide information already provided in the initial request.
Kadar pristojni organ države prosilke vloži zaprosilo za medsebojno pravno pomoč, s katerim se dopolnjuje predhodno zaprosilo, ponovna predložitev podatkov, predloženih v prvotnem zaprosilu, ni potrebna.
The additional request shall contain information necessary for the purpose of identifying the initial request.
Dodatno zaprosilo vsebuje podatke, potrebne za identifikacijo prvotnega zaprosila.
Where, in accordance with the provisions in force, the competent authority which has made a request for mutual assistance participates in the execution of the request in the requested Member State, it may, without prejudice to Article 6(3) of the 2000 Mutual Assistance Convention, make an additional request directly to the competent authority of the requested Member State while present in that State.
Kadar v skladu z veljavnimi določbami pristojni organ, ki je vložil zaprosilo za medsebojno pravno pomoč, sodeluje pri izvršitvi zaprosila v zaprošeni državi in je tam navzoč, lahko brez poseganja v določbo tretjega odstavka 6. člena Konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči iz leta 2000 vloži dodatno zaprosilo neposredno pri pristojnem organu zaprošene države.
Banking secrecy
Bančna tajnost
A Member State shall not invoke banking secrecy as a reason for refusing any cooperation regarding a request for mutual assistance from another Member State.
Država članica se ne sme sklicevati na bančno tajnost kot razlog za zavrnitev sodelovanja v zvezi z zaprosilom za medsebojno pravno pomoč iz druge države članice.