natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Without prejudice to the second paragraph, the States, other than the Member States, which are parties to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and also the EFTA Surveillance Authority referred to in that Agreement, may intervene in cases before the Court of Justice where one of the fields of application of that Agreement is concerned.
Ne glede na prejšnji odstavek lahko države podpisnice Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru, ki niso države članice, ter v tem sporazumu navedeni Nadzorni organ EFTA vstopijo v postopek, ki poteka pred Sodiščem, če ta zadeva eno od področij uporabe tega sporazuma.
The objection shall not have the effect of staying enforcement of the judgment by default unless the Court of Justice decides otherwise.
Če Sodišče na odloči drugače, ugovor ne zadrži izvršitve zamudne sodbe.
Member States, institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and any other natural or legal persons may, in cases and under conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure, institute third-party proceedings to contest a judgment rendered without their being heard, where the judgment is prejudicial to their rights.
Države članice, institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije in vse druge fizične ali pravne osebe lahko v primerih in pod pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, vložijo ugovor tretjega, s katerim lahko izpodbijajo sodbo, ki je bila izdana v zadevi, pri kateri same niso bile udeležene, sodba pa vpliva na njihove pravice.
If the meaning or scope of a judgment is in doubt, the Court of Justice shall construe it on application by any party or any institution of the Union establishing an interest therein.
V primeru nejasnosti pomena ali posledic sodbe Sodišče na predlog stranke ali institucije Unije, ki ima upravičen interes, poda razlago.
An application for revision of a judgment may be made to the Court of Justice only on discovery of a fact which is of such a nature as to be a decisive factor, and which, when the judgment was given, was unknown to the Court and to the party claiming the revision.
Obnovo postopka se lahko pri Sodišču predlaga le v primeru, ko se odkrije novo dejstvo odločilnega pomena, ki je bilo pred izrekom sodbe neznano Sodišču in stranki, ki zahteva obnovo.
No application for revision may be made after the lapse of ten years from the date of the judgment.
Po poteku desetih let od dne razglasitve sodbe ni več mogoče vložiti predloga za obnovo postopka.
Periods of grace based on considerations of distance shall be laid down in the Rules of Procedure.
Roki zaradi oddaljenosti se določijo s poslovnikom.
No right shall be prejudiced in consequence of the expiry of a time-limit if the party concerned proves the existence of unforeseeable circumstances or of force majeure.
Potek roka ne vpliva na pravice, če zadevna stranka dokaže obstoj nepredvidenih okoliščin ali višje sile.
Proceedings against the Union in matters arising from non-contractual liability shall be barred after a period of five years from the occurrence of the event giving rise thereto.
Tožbe proti Uniji v zadevah, ki izhajajo iz nepogodbene odgovornosti, zastarajo po petih letih od nastanka dogodka, na katerem ta temelji.
The period of limitation shall be interrupted if proceedings are instituted before the Court of Justice or if prior to such proceedings an application is made by the aggrieved party to the relevant institution of the Union.
Zastaranje se pretrga, če se pred Sodiščem vloži tožba ali če je oškodovanec predhodno naslovil svojo zahtevo na pristojno institucijo Unije.
In the latter event the proceedings must be instituted within the period of two months provided for in Article III-365 of the Constitution. The second paragraph of Article III-367 of the Constitution shall apply.
V tem primeru je treba vložiti tožbo v roku dveh mesecev iz III-365. člena Ustave. Uporablja se drugi odstavek III-367. člena Ustave.
This Article shall also apply to proceedings against the European Central Bank regarding non-contractual liability.
Ta člen se uporablja tudi za tožbe proti Evropski centralni banki glede nepogodbene odgovornosti.
THE GENERAL COURT
SODIŠČE SPLOŠNE PRISTOJNOSTI
The first paragraph of Article 9, Articles 14 and 15, the first, second, fourth and fifth paragraphs of Article 17 and Article 18 shall apply to the General Court and its members.
Prvi odstavek 9. člena, 14. in 15. člen, prvi, drugi, četrti in peti odstavek 17. člena ter 18. člen tega statuta se uporabljajo za Sodišče splošne pristojnosti in njegove člane.
Articles 10, 11 and 14 shall apply to the Registrar of the General Court mutatis mutandis.
10., 11. in 14. člen tega statuta se smiselno uporabljajo za sodnega tajnika Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
The General Court shall consist of twenty-five Judges.
Sodišče splošne pristojnosti ima petindvajset sodnikov.
The members of the General Court may be called upon to perform the task of an Advocate-General.
Člani Sodišča splošne pristojnosti so lahko imenovani za opravljanje naloge generalnega pravobranilca.
It shall be the duty of the Advocate-General, acting with complete impartiality and independence, to make, in open court, reasoned submissions on certain cases brought before the General Court in order to assist that Court in the performance of its task.
Generalni pravobranilec popolnoma nepristransko in neodvisno javno predstavi obrazložene sklepne predloge o zadevah, predloženih Sodišču splošne pristojnosti, zato da bi slednjemu pomagal pri opravljanju njegove naloge.
The criteria for selecting such cases, as well as the procedures for designating the Advocates-General, shall be laid down in the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Merila za izbiro takšnih zadev in postopki za imenovanje generalnih pravobranilcev so določeni v poslovniku Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
A member called upon to perform the task of Advocate-General in a case may not take part in the judgment of the case.
Član, ki je imenovan za opravljanje naloge generalnega pravobranilca v neki zadevi, ne sme sodelovati pri odločanju o njej.
The General Court shall sit in chambers of three or five Judges.
Sodišče splošne pristojnosti zaseda v senatih treh ali petih sodnikov.
The Presidents of the chambers of five Judges shall be elected for three years. They may be re-elected once.
Predsedniki senatov petih sodnikov so izvoljeni za tri leta. Ponovno so lahko izvoljeni enkrat.
In certain cases governed by the Rules of Procedure, the General Court may sit as a full court or be constituted by a single Judge.
V nekaterih primerih, ki jih ureja poslovnik, lahko Sodišče splošne pristojnosti odloča na občni seji ali pa odloča sodnik posameznik.
The Rules of Procedure may also provide that the General Court may sit in a Grand Chamber in cases and under the conditions specified therein.
Poslovnik lahko določa tudi, da Sodišče splošne pristojnosti zaseda v velikem senatu v zadevah in pod pogoji, navedenimi v njem.
By way of derogation from the rule laid down in Article III-358(1) of the Constitution, jurisdiction shall be reserved to the Court of Justice in the actions referred to in Articles III-365 and III-367 of the Constitution when they are brought by a Member State against:
Ne glede na pravilo, določeno v prvem odstavku III-358. člena Ustave, je odločanje o tožbah iz III-365. in III-367. člena Ustave, ki jih vložijo države članice, pridržano za Sodišče, če so vložene:
(a) an act of or failure to act by the European Parliament or the Council, or both those institutions acting jointly, except for:
a) proti aktu ali opustitvi ukrepanja Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta ali obeh institucij, ki odločata skupaj, razen:
European decisions adopted by the Council under the third subparagraph of Article III-168(2) of the Constitution;
proti evropskim sklepom, ki jih sprejme Svet na podlagi tretjega pododstavka drugega odstavka III-168. člena Ustave,
acts of the Council adopted pursuant to a Council act concerning measures to protect trade within the meaning of Article III-315 of the Constitution;
proti aktom, ki jih sprejme Svet na podlagi akta Sveta glede zaščite trgovine v smislu III-315. člena Ustave,
acts of the Council by which the Council exercises implementing powers in accordance with Article I-37(2) of the Constitution;
proti aktom Sveta, s katerimi ta izvršuje izvedbena pooblastila v skladu z drugim odstavkom I-37. člena Ustave;
(b) against an act of or failure to act by the Commission under Article III-420(1) of the Constitution.
b) proti aktu ali opustitvi ukrepanja Komisije na podlagi prvega odstavka III-420. člena Ustave.
Jurisdiction shall also be reserved to the Court of Justice in the actions referred to in the same Articles when they are brought by an institution of the Union against an act of or failure to act by the European Parliament or the Council or both of those institutions acting jointly or the Commission, or brought by an institution against an act of or failure to act by the European Central Bank.
Odločanje o tožbah iz omenjenih členov, ki jih vloži institucija Unije proti aktu ali opustitvi ukrepanja Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, obeh institucij, ki odločata skupaj, ali Komisije, in tožbe, ki jih vloži institucija proti aktu ali opustitvi ukrepanja Evropske centralne banke, je prav tako pridržano za Sodišče.
The President of the Court of Justice and the President of the General Court shall determine, by common accord, the conditions under which officials and other servants attached to the Court of Justice shall render their services to the General Court to enable it to function.
Predsednik Sodišča in predsednik Sodišča splošne pristojnosti v medsebojnem soglasju določita, na kakšen način uradniki in drugi uslužbenci Sodišča opravljajo naloge za Sodišče splošne pristojnosti, da bi tako zagotovili njegovo delovanje.
Certain officials or other servants shall be responsible to the Registrar of the General Court under the authority of the President of the General Court.
Nekateri uradniki ali drugi uslužbenci so odgovorni sodnemu tajniku Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, ki je podrejen predsedniku Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
The procedure before the General Court shall be governed by Title III.
Postopek pred Sodiščem splošne pristojnosti ureja III. naslov.
Notwithstanding the fourth paragraph of Article 20, the Advocate-General may make his reasoned submissions in writing.
Ne glede na četrti odstavek 20. člena tega statuta lahko generalni pravobranilec svoje obrazložene sklepne predloge da v pisni obliki.
Where an application or other procedural document addressed to the General Court is lodged by mistake with the Registrar of the Court of Justice, it shall be transmitted immediately by that Registrar to the Registrar of the General Court.
Če je vloga ali drug procesni dokument, naslovljen na Sodišče splošne pristojnosti, pomotoma vložen pri sodnem tajniku Sodišča, ga ta nemudoma pošlje sodnemu tajniku Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
Likewise, where an application or other procedural document addressed to the Court of Justice is lodged by mistake with the Registrar of the General Court, it shall be transmitted immediately by that Registrar to the Registrar of the Court of Justice.
Prav tako, če je vloga ali drug procesni dokument, naslovljen na Sodišče, pomotoma vložen pri sodnem tajniku Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, ga ta nemudoma pošlje sodnemu tajniku Sodišča.
Where the General Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action in respect of which the Court of Justice has jurisdiction, it shall refer that action to the Court of Justice.
Če Sodišče splošne pristojnosti ugotovi, da ni pristojno za obravnavanje in odločanje o tožbi, za katero je pristojno Sodišče, jo odstopi Sodišču.
Likewise, where the Court of Justice finds that an action falls within the jurisdiction of the General Court, it shall refer that action to the General Court, whereupon that Court may not decline jurisdiction.
Prav tako, če Sodišče ugotovi, da je za tožbo pristojno Sodišče splošne pristojnosti, jo odstopi Sodišču splošne pristojnosti, to pa se ne more razglasiti za nepristojno.
Where the Court of Justice and the General Court are seised of cases in which the same relief is sought, the same issue of interpretation is raised or the validity of the same act is called in question, the General Court may, after hearing the parties, stay the proceedings before it until such time as the Court of Justice has delivered judgment, or, where the action is one brought pursuant to Article III-365 of the Constitution or pursuant to Article 146 of the EAEC Treaty, may decline jurisdiction so as to allow the Court of Justice to rule on such actions.
Če so Sodišču in Sodišču splošne pristojnosti predložene zadeve, kjer je predmet isti, kjer se postavlja isto vprašanje razlage ali odloča o veljavnosti istega akta, lahko Sodišče splošne pristojnosti po tem, ko je dalo strankam možnost, da zavzamejo stališče, postopek prekine, dokler Sodišče ne izda sodbe, ali, če gre za tožbe, vložene na podlagi III-365. člena Ustave ali člena 146 Pogodbe ESAE, razglasi za nepristojno, da bi o njih lahko odločalo Sodišče.
In the same circumstances, the Court of Justice may also decide to stay the proceedings before it.
Pod istimi pogoji lahko tudi Sodišče prekine postopek.
In that event, the proceedings before the General Court shall continue.
V tem primeru se postopek pred Sodiščem splošne pristojnosti nadaljuje.
Where a Member State and an institution are challenging the same act, the General Court shall decline jurisdiction so that the Court of Justice may rule on those applications.
Če država članica in institucija izpodbijata isti akt, se Sodišče splošne pristojnosti razglasi za nepristojno, da bi o teh tožbah lahko odločalo Sodišče.
Final decisions of the General Court, decisions disposing of the substantive issues in part only or disposing of a procedural issue concerning a plea of lack of competence or inadmissibility, shall be notified by the Registrar of the General Court to all parties as well as all Member States and the institutions of the Union even if they did not intervene in the case before the General Court.
Sodni tajnik Sodišča splošne pristojnosti odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, s katerimi se zaključi postopek, s katerimi se zaključi postopek le o delu predmeta postopka, o odločitvah o procesnih vprašanjih glede ugovora nepristojnosti ali nedopustnosti uradno obvesti vse stranke ter države članice in institucije Unije, četudi niso vstopile v postopek pred Sodiščem splošne pristojnosti.
An appeal may be brought before the Court of Justice, within two months of the notification of the decision appealed against, against final decisions of the General Court and decisions of that Court disposing of the substantive issues in part only or disposing of a procedural issue concerning a plea of lack of competence or inadmissibility.
Zoper odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, s katerimi se zaključi postopek, in zoper odločbe tega sodišča s katerimi se zaključi postopek le o delu predmeta postopka ali odločitvam o procesnih vprašanjih glede ugovora nepristojnosti ali nedopustnosti, se lahko pred Sodiščem vloži pritožba v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o odločbi, ki se izpodbija.
However, interveners other than the Member States and the institutions of the Union may bring such an appeal only where the decision of the General Court directly affects them.
Tisti, ki so vstopili v postopek, razen držav članic in institucij Unije, pa lahko vložijo takšno pritožbo le, če jih odločba Sodišča splošne pristojnosti neposredno zadeva.
With the exception of cases relating to disputes between the Union and its servants, an appeal may also be brought by Member States and institutions of the Union which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court.
Razen v zadevah, ki se nanašajo na spore med Unijo in njenimi uslužbenci, lahko pritožbo vložijo tudi države članice in institucije Unije, ki niso vstopile v postopek pred Sodiščem splošne pristojnosti.
Any person whose application to intervene has been dismissed by the General Court may appeal to the Court of Justice within two weeks from the notification of the decision dismissing the application.
Vsakdo, čigar vlogo o vstopu v postopek je Sodišče splošne pristojnosti zavrnilo, se lahko v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o odločbi o zavrnitvi predloga pritoži pred Sodiščem.
The parties to the proceedings may appeal to the Court of Justice against any decision of the General Court made pursuant to Article III-379(1) or (2) or the fourth paragraph of Article III-401 of the Constitution, or Article 157 or the third paragraph of Article 164 of the EAEC Treaty, within two months from their notification.
Stranke v postopku se lahko pritožijo na Sodišče zoper vse odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, sprejete na podlagi prvega ali drugega odstavka III-379. člena ali četrtega odstavka III-401. člena Ustave ali člena 157 ali tretjega odstavka člena 164 Pogodbe ESAE, v dveh mesecih po uradnem obvestilu o njih.
The appeal referred to in the first two paragraphs shall be heard and determined under the procedure referred to in Article 39.
O pritožbi iz prvega in drugega odstavka tega člena se odloča v skladu s postopkom iz 39. člena tega statuta.
It shall lie on the grounds of lack of competence of the General Court, a breach of procedure before it which adversely affects the interests of the appellant as well as the infringement of Union law by the General Court.
Lahko se vloži zaradi nepristojnosti Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, zaradi kršitve postopka pred tem sodiščem, ki vpliva na interese pritožnika, pa tudi zaradi kršitve prava Unije s strani Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
Where an appeal is brought against a decision of the General Court, the procedure before the Court of Justice shall consist of a written part and an oral part.
Če je pritožba vložena proti odločbi Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, ima postopek pred Sodiščem pisni in ustni del.
In accordance with conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure, the Court of Justice, having heard the Advocate-General and the parties, may dispense with the oral procedure.
Sodišče lahko v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, po izjasnitvi generalnega pravobranilca in potem, ko so stranke o tem zavzele stališče, odloči brez ustnega postopka.
Without prejudice to Article III-379(1) and (2) of the Constitution or Article 157 of the EAEC Treaty, an appeal shall not have suspensory effect.
Ne glede na prvi in drugi odstavek III-379. člena Ustave in člen 157 Pogodbe ESAE pritožba nima odložilnega učinka.
By way of derogation from Article III-380 of the Constitution, decisions of the General Court declaring a European law or European regulation binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States to be void shall take effect only as from the date of expiry of the period referred to in the first paragraph of Article 56 of this Statute or, if an appeal shall have been brought within that period, as from the date of dismissal of the appeal, without prejudice, however, to the right of a party to apply to the Court of Justice, pursuant to Article III-379(1) and (2) of the Constitution, and Article 157 of the EAEC Treaty for the suspension of the effects of the European law or European regulation which has been declared void or for the prescription of any other interim measure.
Ne glede na III-380. člen Ustave začnejo odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti, s katerimi se neki evropski zakon ali evropska uredba, ki je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah, razglasi za nično, učinkovati šele z datumom poteka roka iz prvega odstavka 56. člena tega statuta ali, če je bila v tem roku vložena pritožba, z datumom njene zavrnitve, vendar to ne vpliva na pravico stranke, da skladno s prvim in drugim odstavkom III-379. člena Ustave in členom 157 Pogodbe ESAE pri Sodišču predlaga začasno odložitev učinkov evropskega zakona ali evropske uredbe, ki je bila razglašena za nično, ali za sprejem druge začasne odredbe.
If the appeal is well founded, the Court of Justice shall quash the decision of the General Court.
Če je pritožba utemeljena, Sodišče razveljavi odločbo Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
It may itself give final judgment in the matter, where the state of the proceedings so permits, or refer the case back to the General Court for judgment.
Če stanje postopka to dovoljuje, lahko samo dokončno odloči o zadevi ali pa jo vrne v ponovno odločanje Sodišču splošne pristojnosti.
Where a case is referred back to the General Court, that Court shall be bound by the decision of the Court of Justice on points of law.
Če je zadeva vrnjena v ponovno odločanje Sodišču splošne pristojnosti, je to sodišče glede pravnih vprašanj vezano na odločbo Sodišča.
When an appeal brought by a Member State or an institution of the Union, which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court, is well founded, the Court of Justice may, if it considers this necessary, state which of the effects of the decision of the General Court which has been quashed shall be considered as definitive in respect of the parties to the litigation.
Če je pritožba, ki jo vložita država članica ali institucija Unije, ki se nista vstopili v postopek pred Sodiščem splošne pristojnosti, utemeljena, lahko Sodišče, če meni, da je to potrebno, navede, kateri učinki razveljavljene odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti naj se za stranke v postopku štejejo za dokončne.
In the cases provided for in Article III-358(2) and (3) of the Constitution, where the First Advocate-General considers that there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected, he may propose that the Court of Justice review the decision of the General Court.
Če v primerih iz prvega in tretjega odstavka III-358. člena Ustave prvi generalni pravobranilec meni, da obstaja resna nevarnost za enotnost ali doslednost prava Unije, lahko predlaga, da Sodišče preuči odločitev Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
The proposal must be made within one month of delivery of the decision by the General Court.
Predlog mora biti vložen v roku enega meseca po razglasitvi odločbe Sodišča splošne pristojnosti.
Within one month of receiving the proposal made by the First Advocate-General, the Court of Justice shall decide whether or not the decision should be reviewed.
V enem mesecu po prejemu predloga prvega generalnega pravobranilca Sodišče odloči, ali je treba odločitev ponovno preučiti ali ne.
The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and of the General Court shall contain any provisions necessary for applying and, where required, supplementing this Statute.
Poslovnika Sodišča in Sodišča splošne pristojnosti vsebujeta vse določbe, ki so potrebne za uporabo in po potrebi za dopolnitev tega statuta.
The rules governing the language arrangements applicable at the Court of Justice of the European Union shall be laid down by a European regulation of the Council acting unanimously.
Pravila, ki urejajo vprašanje jezikov na Sodišču Evropske unije, se določijo z evropsko uredbo, ki jo sprejme Svet soglasno.
This regulation shall be adopted either at the request of the Court of Justice and after consultation of the Commission and the European Parliament, or on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the Court of Justice and of the European Parliament.
Ta uredba se sprejme bodisi na predlog Sodišča in po posvetovanju s Komisijo in Evropskim parlamentom ali na predlog Komisije in po posvetovanju s Sodiščem in Evropskim parlamentom.
Until those rules have been adopted, the provisions of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court governing language arrangements shall apply.
Dokler se ta pravila ne sprejmejo, se uporabljajo določbe poslovnika Sodišča in poslovnika Sodišča splošne pristojnosti o ureditvi vprašanja jezikov.
By way of derogation from Articles III-355 and III-356 of the Constitution, those provisions may only be amended or repealed with the unanimous consent of the Council.
Ne glede na III-355. in III-366. člen Ustave se te določbe lahko spremenijo ali razveljavijo le s soglasno odobritvijo Sveta.