natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(4) Within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings, the costs of translation into the Slovenian, Italian or Hungarian languages, incurred by the application of the provisions of the act governing the right of members of the Italian and Hungarian ethnic minorities to use their mother tongues, shall not be charged to the persons who pursuant to the provisions of this Act are obliged to cover the costs of misdemeanour proceedings.
(4) Stroški za prevajanje v slovenski, italijanski ali madžarski jezik, ki nastanejo z uporabo določb zakona o pravici pripadnikov italijanske in madžarske narodne skupnosti do uporabe svojega jezika, se ne zaračunajo tistim, ki so po določbah tega zakona dolžni povrniti stroške postopka o prekršku.
(5) The costs of translation shall not be charged to the accused person if he does not understand or speak the language in which the misdemeanour proceedings are conducted.
(5) Stroški za prevajanje se ne zaračunajo obdolžencu, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, v katerem teče postopek o prekršku.
Who pays legal costs
Kdo plača stroške postopka
(1) Legal costs shall be paid by the person on whom a misdemeanour sanction has been imposed.
(1) Stroške postopka plača tisti, ki mu je bila izrečena sankcija za prekršek.
(2) If the proceedings covered a number of misdemeanours, the person on whom a sanction has been imposed shall not cover the costs for those misdemeanours in the case of which the proceedings were stopped, if it is possible to exclude these costs from the total costs.
(2) Če je tekel postopek zaradi več prekrškov, tisti, ki mu je bila izrečena sankcija, ne trpi stroškov za tiste prekrške, glede katerih je bil postopek ustavljen, če se dajo ti stroški izločiti iz skupnih stroškov.
The payment of the lump-sum court fee shall be determined for every accused person separately.
Plačilo povprečnine se določi za vsakega obdolženca posebej.
(4) Legal costs incurred by stopped proceedings shall be covered from the budget.
(4) Stroški postopka, ki je bil ustavljen, bremenijo proračun.
(5) The court conducting the misdemeanour proceedings may release an accused person on whom a sanction was imposed from covering the legal costs referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 143 of this Act, except for the remuneration for and necessary costs incurred by the defence counsel, if the payment of costs would threaten the accused person&apos;s sustenance or the sustenance of those whom he is obliged to sustain.
(5) Sodišče, ki vodi postopek o prekršku, sme oprostiti obdolženca, ki mu je bila izrečena sankcija, povrnitve stroškov postopka iz prvega odstavka 143. člena tega zakona, razen nagrade in potrebnih izdatkov zagovornika, če bi bilo zaradi plačila stroškov ogroženo njegovo vzdrževanje ali vzdrževanje tistih, ki jih je dolžan preživljati.
(6) Anyone who consciously lodges a false misdemeanour report shall pay the legal costs.
(6) Kdor vedoma vloži krivo prijavo o prekršku, plača stroške postopka.
Order on legal costs
Sklep o stroških
(1) The misdemeanour judgement shall specify the person responsible for covering the costs and the amount of the costs.
(1) V sodbi o prekršku se določi, kdo plača stroške in kolikšni so.
(2) If there is no sufficient data for the determination of costs, a special order on legal costs shall be issued subsequently.
(2) Če za ugotovitev stroškov ni zadosti podatkov, se izda pozneje o stroških postopka poseben sklep.
(3) A claim including information on the amount of legal costs of stopped proceedings may be lodged within three months of the day the final judgement or order was served on the person entitled to lodge such a claim.
(3) Zahtevek s podatki o višini stroškov postopka, ki je bil ustavljen, se lahko poda najpozneje v treh mesecih od dneva, ko je bila pravnomočna sodba ali sklep vročen tistemu, ki ima pravico podati takšen zahtevek.
Special costs
Posebni stroški
(1) Irrespective of the outcome of the misdemeanour proceedings, the accused person, injured party, defence counsel, legal representative, authorised person, accused legal person&apos;s representative, witness, expert and interpreter shall pay the costs of misdemeanour proceedings delays and other costs caused by their fault, as well as the appropriate proportion of the lump-sum court fee.
(1) Obdolženec, oškodovanec, zagovornik, zakoniti zastopnik, pooblaščenec, zastopnik obdolžene pravne osebe, priča, izvedenec in tolmač plačajo ne glede na izid postopka o prekršku stroške svoje privedbe, preložitve dejanja v postopku o prekršku in druge stroške, ki so jih povzročili po svoji krivdi, kot tudi ustrezen znesek povprečnine.
(2) A special order shall be issued on the costs referred to in the preceding paragraph.
(2) O stroških iz prejšnjega odstavka se odloči s posebnim sklepom.
Legal costs of appeal
Stroški v postopku s pravnimi sredstvi
(1) The payment of costs incurred by a higher court shall be decided upon by that court in accordance with the provisions of Articles 143 to 146 of this Act.
(1) O plačilu stroškov, ki nastanejo pri višjem sodišču, odloča dokončno to sodišče v skladu z določbami 143. do 146. člena tega zakona.
(2) No lump-sum court fee shall be determined if the decision issued by the higher court entirely or partially granted the appeal lodged by the accused person.
(2) Povprečnina se ne določi, če je bilo z odločbo višjega sodišča odločeno v celoti ali deloma v obdolženčevo korist.
(3) The lump-sum court fee shall also be determined if the appeal is dismissed.
(3) Povprečnina se določi tudi, če je bila pritožba zavržena.
Legal costs of extraordinary appeal
Stroški v postopku z izrednim pravnim sredstvom
The payment of costs incurred by extraordinary appellate proceedings shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the application of the provisions of Articles 143 to 146 of this Act.
Glede plačila stroškov, ki nastanejo v postopku z izrednim pravnim sredstvom, se smiselno uporabljajo določbe 143. do 146. člena tega zakona.
Issuance of legal cost regulations
Izdaja predpisov o stroških postopka
The minister responsible for justice shall issue the more detailed regulations governing legal costs.
Minister, pristojen za pravosodje, izda natančnejše predpise o stroških postopka o prekršku.
Appellate proceedings
Pritožbeni postopek
(1) An appeal may be lodged with a higher court against a misdemeanour judgement.
(1) Zoper sodbo o prekršku se lahko vloži pritožba na višje sodišče.
(2) An appeal to the benefit of the accused person may be lodged by the accused person or his defence counsel, his spouse or person living in cohabitation with the accused person, direct blood relative, legal representative, adoptive parent, adoptive child, brother, sister or foster parent.
(2) Pritožbo v korist obdolženca lahko vložijo obdolženec oziroma njegov zagovornik, njegov zakonec ali oseba, ki živi z obdolžencem v zunajzakonski skupnosti, krvni sorodnik v ravni vrsti, zakoniti zastopnik, posvojitelj, posvojenec, brat, sestra ali rejnik.
If the accused person is a legal person, the appeal may be lodged by the legal person&apos;s representative or defence counsel.
Za pravno osebo lahko vloži pritožbo njen zastopnik oziroma njen zagovornik.
(3) An appeal may also be lodged by the petitioner of proceedings.
(3) Pritožbo lahko vloži tudi predlagatelj postopka.
The petitioner may lodge an appeal both to the detriment and to the benefit of the accused person.
Predlagatelj se lahko pritoži tako v škodo, kot v korist obdolženca.
(4) If the sanction of seizure of items which are not the property of the accused person is imposed, the owner of the items may appeal against the imposition of seizure of items.
(4) Če je izrečena sankcija odvzema predmetov, ki niso last obdolženca, se sme lastnik predmetov pritožiti glede izreka o odvzemu predmetov.
(5) The defence counsel, spouse or person living in cohabitation with the accused person, direct blood relative, legal representative, adoptive parent, adoptive child, brother, sister and foster parent of the accused person may lodge an appeal without any special permission granted by him, but not against his will.
(5) Zagovornik, zakonec ali oseba, ki živi z obdolžencem v zunajzakonski skupnosti, krvni sorodnik v ravni vrsti, zakoniti zastopnik, posvojitelj, posvojenec, brat, sestra in rejnik obdolženca lahko vložijo pritožbo tudi brez njegovega posebnega dovoljenja, vendar ne proti njegovi volji.
The time limit for lodging the appeal shall begin to expire on the day on which a copy of the judgement was served on the accused person or his legal representative.
Rok za pritožbo teče tudi v tem primeru od dneva, ko je bil prepis sodbe vročen obdolžencu oziroma njegovemu zagovorniku.
(6) Persons who were imposed order maintenance fines shall also have the right to appeal.
(6) Pravico do pritožbe imajo tudi tisti, ki so jim bile izrečene redovne globe.
Time limit for and manner of lodging an appeal
Rok in način vložitve pritožbe
(1) An appeal shall be lodged within eight days of the day the judgement was served.
(1) Pritožba se vloži v osmih dneh po vročitvi sodbe.
(2) The time limit for lodging an appeal against a judgement which was announced orally shall begin to expire on the day of its announcement, unless the participant requested that a copy of the judgement be sent to him.
(2) Rok za pritožbo zoper sodbo, ki je bila ustno naznanjena, začne teči z dnem naznanitve, razen če je udeleženec zahteval, da se mu pošlje prepis sodbe.
(3) The appeal shall be lodged in writing with the court which issued the misdemeanour judgement in a sufficient number of copies to submit the appeal to the court conducting the proceedings, petitioner, accused person and defence counsel.
(3) Pritožba se vloži pisno pri sodišču, ki je izdalo sodbo o prekršku in v zadostnem številu izvodov za sodišče, ki vodi postopek, za predlagatelja, obdolženca in zagovornika, da se jim vroči.
Waiving the right to appeal and withdrawing an appeal
Odpoved pravici do pritožbe in umik
(2) The waiver and withdrawal of an appeal may not be revoked.
(2) Odpovedi pritožbi in umika pritožbe ni mogoče preklicati.
Content of appeal
Vsebina pritožbe
The appeal must comprise an indication of the judgement against which it has been lodged, the reason for challenging the judgement, explanation, proposal to repeal or amend the judgement, and appellant&apos;s signature.
Pritožba mora obsegati navedbo sodbe, proti kateri je podana, razlog za izpodbijanje, obrazložitev, predlog, naj se razveljavi ali spremeni in pritožnikov podpis.
Reasons for appeal
Razlogi za pritožbo
A misdemeanour judgement may be challenged:
Sodba o prekršku se sme izpodbijati:
due to a substantial violation of the provisions of misdemeanour proceedings;
zaradi bistvene kršitve določb postopka o prekršku;
due to a violation of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour;
zaradi kršitve materialnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek;
due to a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts;
zaradi zmotne ali nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja;
due to the decision on sanctions, deprivation of a pecuniary advantage, legal costs of the misdemeanour proceedings and pecuniary claims.
zaradi odločitve o sankcijah, o odvzemu premoženjske koristi, o stroških postopka o prekršku in o premoženjskopravnem zahtevku.
Substantial violation of the provisions of misdemeanour proceedings
Bistvena kršitev določb postopka
(1) A substantial violation of the provisions of misdemeanour proceedings shall be deemed to have been committed:
(1) Bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku je podana:
if an official person participated in the proceedings who should have been excluded (Article 84) or if this person was excluded on the basis of a final decision (Article 87);
če je v postopku sodelovala uradna oseba, ki bi morala biti izločena (84. člen) ali je s pravnomočno odločbo bila izločena (87. člen);
if the accusation petition has been lodged by a person who is not permitted to be a petitioner;
če je obdolžilni predlog podal nekdo, ki ne more biti predlagatelj;
if the accused person had not been examined within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings before the misdemeanour judgement was issued, except for the cases referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 69 of this Act;
če obdolženec v postopku o prekršku ni bil zaslišan pred izdajo sodbe o prekršku, razen v primerih iz drugega odstavka 69. člena tega zakona;
if, despite their request during the oral examination or during the performance of other acts within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings, the accused person or his defence counsel were deprived of the right to use their mother tongue or a language they understand, and of the right to listen to the oral examination and proceedings in their mother tongue or language they understand;
če je bil obdolženec ali njegov zagovornik kljub svoji zahtevi na ustni obravnavi ali med izvajanjem drugih dejanj v postopku o prekršku prikrajšan za pravico uporabe svojega jezika oziroma jezika, ki ga razume in za pravice, da v svojem jeziku oziroma jeziku, ki ga razume spremlja potek ustne obravnave oziroma postopka;
if the claim specified in the accusation petition has been exceeded;
če je bil zahtevek, podan v obdolžilnem predlogu, prekoračen;
if the misdemeanour judgement is based on evidence obtained through a violation of constitutionally guaranteed human rights and fundamental freedoms, or on evidence on which it is not permitted to be based pursuant to the provisions of this Act;
če se sodba o prekršku opira na dokaz, ki je bil pridobljen s kršitvijo z ustavo določenih človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ali na dokaz, na katerega se po določbah tega zakona ne more opirati;
if the new misdemeanour judgement, issued after the previous judgement was repealed, violates the provision of paragraph 11 of Article 163 of this Act;
če je bila z novo sodbo o prekršku, izdano po razveljavitvi prejšnje sodbe prekršena določba enajstega odstavka 163. člena tega zakona;
if the operative part of the judgement is incomprehensible, if it is in conflict with itself or with the reasons for the judgement;
če je izrek sodbe nerazumljiv, če nasprotuje sam sebi ali razlogom sodbe;
or if the judgement indicates no reasons or if the reasons are incomprehensible.
ali če sodba nima razlogov oziroma so razlogi nerazumljivi.
(2) A substantial violation of the provisions of the misdemeanour judgement shall also be deemed to have been committed if during the misdemeanour proceedings or upon issuing the judgement the court failed to apply or incorrectly applied any other provision of this Act, where this affected or could have affected the legality of the judgement.
(2) Bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku je podana tudi, če sodišče med postopkom ali ob izdaji sodbe ni uporabilo ali je nepravilno uporabilo kakšno drugo določbo tega zakona, pa je to vplivalo ali bi moglo vplivati na zakonitost sodbe.
Violation of substantive provisions of the Act
Kršitev materialnih določb zakona
A violation of the substantive provisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour shall be deemed to have been committed if the violation is associated with the following questions:
Kršitev materialnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, je podana, če je kršitev podana glede vprašanja:
whether the act due to which proceedings have been instituted against the accused person is a misdemeanour;
ali je dejanje, zaradi katerega je zoper obdolženca začet postopek, prekršek;
whether circumstances excluding misdemeanour liability are in place;
ali so podane okoliščine, ki izključujejo odgovornost za prekršek;
whether circumstances excluding misdemeanour proceedings are in place, and particularly whether misdemeanour prosecution has become statute-barred, and whether a final judgement deciding the case has been issued;
ali so podane okoliščine, ki izključujejo postopek o prekršku, zlasti pa ali je pregon za prekršek zastaral in ali je o zadevi že pravnomočno odločeno;
whether a regulation that should not have been applied has nevertheless been applied in relation to the misdemeanour which is the subject of the accusation petition;
ali je bil glede prekrška, ki je predmet obdolžilnega predloga uporabljen predpis, ki se ne bi smel uporabiti;
whether the decision on sanctions or deprivation of a pecuniary advantage has transgressed any rights which pursuant to the law are vested in the court;
ali je bila z odločitvijo o sankcijah ali odvzemu premoženjske koristi prekoračena pravica, ki jo ima po zakonu sodišče;
whether the provisions governing the inclusion of apprehension and detention have been violated.
ali so bile prekršene določbe o vštetju pridržanja ali pripora.
Mistake in the finding of facts and incomplete finding of facts
Zmotna in nepopolna ugotovitev dejanskega stanja
(1) A mistake in the finding of facts shall be deemed to have been made if a mistake has been made in the finding of a specific decisive fact, or if an incorrect conclusion has been made on the basis of the facts established.
(1) Dejansko stanje je zmotno ugotovljeno, če je kakšno odločilno dejstvo zmotno ugotovljeno, ali če je iz ugotovljenih dejstev napravljen nepravilen sklep.
(2) The finding of facts shall be deemed to be incomplete if a certain decisive fact has not been established at all.
(2) Dejansko stanje je nepopolno ugotovljeno, če kakšno odločilno dejstvo sploh ni bilo ugotovljeno.
(3) Within the framework of the establishment of a mistake in the finding of facts or incomplete finding of facts on the basis of new facts and evidence, the appellant must prove a reasonable probability that he could not use these facts and evidence in the proceedings in the first instance through no fault of his own.
(3) Pri uveljavljanju zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja na podlagi novih dejstev in dokazov mora pritožnik verjetno izkazati, da jih brez svoje krivde ni mogel uveljavljati v postopku na prvi stopnji.
When he refers to new facts, he must specify the evidence on the basis of which these facts are supposed to be proved;
Ko se sklicuje na nova dejstva, mora navesti dokaze, s katerimi naj bi se ta dejstva dokazovala;
when he refers to new evidence, he must specify the facts which he wishes to prove on the basis of this evidence.
ko se sklicuje na nove dokaze, pa mora navesti dejstva, ki jih s temi dokazi želi dokazati.
Challenging a decision on sanctions
Izpodbijanje odločitve o sankciji
(1) A misdemeanour judgement may also be challenged due to the decision on sanctions if, though the misdemeanour judgement has not transgressed the lawful right of the court to conduct proceedings, the court has failed to determine the sanction proportionately with the circumstances which affect the severity of the sanction.
(1) Sodba o prekršku se sme izpodbijati zaradi odločitve o sankciji tudi tedaj, če z njo sicer ni bila prekoračena zakonita pravica sodišča, ki vodi postopek, vendar to sodišče ni pravilno odmerilo sankcije glede na okoliščine, ki vplivajo na to, ali naj bo sankcija večja ali manjša.
(2) In addition, the decision on sanctions may be challenged if the court in the first instance incorrectly applied the provisions governing admonitions, dismissal, non-imposition or exclusion of sanctions, or if it failed to apply these provisions although all legal conditions were in place for this.
(2) Odločitev o sankciji se sme izpodbijati tudi zaradi tega, ker je sodišče prve stopnje nepravilno uporabilo določbe o opominu, o odpustitvi, neizreku ali o izključitvi sankcije ali ker teh določb ni uporabilo, čeprav so bili za to podani zakoniti pogoji.
(3) The decision on deprivation of a pecuniary advantage may also be challenged if, though this decision did not involve a violation of the substantive decisions of this Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour, the court in the first instance issued the decision incorrectly or failed to impose deprivation of a pecuniary advantage although all legal conditions were in place for this.
(3) Odločitev o odvzemu premoženjske koristi se sme izpodbijati tudi, če sicer ne gre za kršitev materialnopravnih določb tega zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek, pač pa je sodišče prve stopnje nepravilno izdalo to odločitev ali ni izreklo odvzema premoženjske koristi, čeprav so bili za to podani zakoniti pogoji.
(4) The decision on legal costs of the proceedings and pecuniary claim may be challenged if the court decided on these issues in contravention of the provisions of this Act.
(4) Odločitev o stroških postopka in o premoženjskopravnem zahtevku se sme izpodbijati, če je sodišče o teh vprašanjih odločilo v nasprotju z določbami tega zakona.
Testing a misdemeanour judgement
Preizkus sodbe o prekršku
The higher court shall test the part of the misdemeanour judgement which is challenged by the appeal, but it must also test, ex officio, whether a substantial violation has been committed of the provisions of misdemeanour proceedings referred to in points 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of paragraph1 of Article 155, and whether the substantive provisions of the Act or regulation governing the misdemeanour have been violated to the detriment of the accused person (Article 156 of this Act).
Višje sodišče preizkusi sodbo o prekršku v tistem delu, v katerem se s pritožbo izpodbija, vendar mora vselej po uradni dolžnosti preizkusiti, ali je podana bistvena kršitev določb postopka o prekršku iz 1., 5., 6., 7. in 8. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena ter ali so bile v škodo obdolženca kršene materialne določbe zakona ali predpisa, ki določa prekršek (156. člena tega zakona).
Limited reference to violations
Omejeno sklicevanje na kršitve
The appellant may refer in his appeal to the legal violation specified in point 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 155 of this Act only if he could not draw attention to this violation during the misdemeanour proceedings, or if he drew attention to this violation but the court in the first instance failed to observe it.
Na kršitev zakona iz 1. točke prvega odstavka 155. člena tega zakona se sme pritožnik sklicevati v pritožbi samo, če na kršitev ni mogel opozoriti med postopkom o prekršku, ali če je nanjo opozoril, pa je sodišče prve stopnje ni upoštevalo.
Late or impermissible appeal
Prepozna ali nedovoljena pritožba
(1) An appeal shall be deemed to be late if it is lodged after expiry of the legal deadline.
(1) Pritožba je prepozna, če je vložena po poteku zakonskega roka.
(2) An appeal shall be deemed to be impermissible if it has been lodged by a person who does not have the right to appeal or person who waived the right to appeal, if the appeal has been withdrawn or re-lodged after having been withdrawn, or if the appeal is not permitted pursuant to the law.
(2) Pritožba je nedovoljena, če jo je podala oseba, ki nima pravice do pritožbe ali oseba, ki se je pritožbi odpovedala, če je bila pritožba umaknjena ali pa po umiku pritožbe ponovno vložena ali če pritožba po zakonu ni dovoljena.
(3) Late and impermissible appeals shall be dismissed by the court in the first instance by issuing an order.
(3) Prepozno ali nedovoljeno pritožbo zavrže s sklepom sodišče prve stopnje.
The appellant shall have the right to lodge an appeal with a higher court against the order dismissing a late or impermissible appeal.
Proti sklepu, s katerim je bila prepozna ali nedovoljena pritožba zavržena, ima pritožnik pravico do pritožbe na višje sodišče.
(4) The court in the first instance shall without delay send the appeal together with the relevant court record to the higher court in due time.
(4) Sodišče prve stopnje pošlje pravočasno pritožbo s spisom brez odlašanja višjemu sodišču.
Indications of new facts and evidence
Navedbe o novih dejstvih in dokazih
The reporting judge may check the indications of new facts and evidence specified in the appeal with the court which issued the misdemeanour judgement.
O navedbah v pritožbi, ki se tičejo novih dokazov in novih dejstev, se lahko sodnik poročevalec prepriča preko sodišča, ki je izdalo sodbo o prekršku.
He may also obtain from this court a report on the violations of the provisions governing misdemeanour proceedings.
Lahko pa si od tega sodišča preskrbi tudi poročilo o kršitvah določb postopka o prekršku.
Higher court&apos;s decisions regarding appeals
Odločanje višjega sodišča o pritožbi