natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This provision was drafted in keeping with Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which required the Union to respect fundamental rights, and with the mandate issued by Cologne European Council.
Ta določba je bila sestavljena v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki od Unije zahteva, da upošteva temeljne pravice, in v skladu z mandatom, podeljenim v okviru Evropskega sveta v Kölnu.
The term &quot;institutions&quot; is enshrined in Part I of the Constitution.
Izraz »institucije« je utemeljen v I. delu Ustave.
The expression &quot;bodies, offices and agencies&quot; is commonly used in the Constitution to refer to all the authorities set up by the Constitution or by secondary legislation (see, e.g., Articles I-50 or I-51 of the Constitution).
V Ustavi se izraz »organi, uradi in agencije« navadno uporablja za označevanje vseh teles, ustanovljenih z Ustavo ali sekundarno zakonodajo (glej npr. I-50. ali I-51. člen Ustave).
As regards the Member States, it follows unambiguously from the case law of the Court of Justice that the requirement to respect fundamental rights defined in a Union context is only binding on the Member States when they act in the scope of Union law (judgment of 13 July 1989, Case 5/88 Wachauf [1989] ECR 2609; judgment of 18 June 1991, ERT [1991] ECR I-2925); judgment of 18 December 1997 (C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] ECR I-7493).
V zvezi z državami članicami sodna praksa Sodišča nedvoumno določa, da je zahteva po spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, opredeljenih v okviru Unije, zavezujoča za države članice le tedaj, ko ukrepajo znotraj področja uporabe prava Unije (sodba z dne 13. julija 1989, zadeva 5/88 Wachauf [1989] PSES 2609; sodba z dne 18. junija 1991, ERT [1991] PSES I-2925); sodba z dne 18. decembra 1997 (C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] PSES I-7493).
The Court of Justice confirmed this case law in the following terms:
Sodišče je potrdilo to sodno prakso pod naslednjimi pogoji:
&quot;In addition, it should be remembered that the requirements flowing from the protection of fundamental rights in the Community legal order are also binding on Member States when they implement Community rules...&quot;
»Treba je tudi upoštevati, da so zahteve, ki izhajajo iz varstva temeljnih pravic v pravnem redu Skupnosti, zavezujoče tudi za države članice pri njihovem izvajanju pravil Skupnosti...«
(judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, [2000] ECR 2737, paragraph 37 of the grounds).
(sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva C-292/97, [2000] PSES 2737, odstavek 37 obrazložitve).
Of course this rule, as enshrined in this Charter, applies to the central authorities as well as to regional or local bodies, and to public organisations, when they are implementing Union law.
Seveda se to pravilo, utemeljeno v tej listini, uporablja za centralne organe in regionalne ali lokalne organe ter za javne organizacije pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije.
Paragraph 2, together with the second sentence of paragraph 1, confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the competences and tasks which the other Parts of the Constitution confer on the Union.
Drugi odstavek skupaj z drugim stavkom prvega odstavka potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve pristojnosti in nalog, ki so z drugimi deli Ustave dodeljene Uniji.
Explicit mention is made here of the logical consequences of the principle of subsidiarity and of the fact that the Union only has those powers which have been conferred upon it.
Gre za to, da se izrecno navedejo logične posledice, nastale zaradi načela subsidiarnosti in zaradi dejstva, da ima Unija samo tiste pristojnosti, ki so ji bile dodeljene.
The fundamental rights as guaranteed in the Union do not have any effect other than in the context of the powers determined by Parts I and III of the Constitution.
Temeljne pravice, zagotovljene v Uniji, nimajo nikakršnih posledic, razen v okviru pristojnosti, določenih v I. in III. delu Ustave.
Consequently, an obligation, pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph 1, for the Union&apos;s institutions to promote principles laid down in the Charter, may arise only within the limits of these same powers.
Zato obveznost institucij Unije, da v skladu z drugim stavkom prvega odstavka spodbujajo načela, podana v Listini, lahko obstaja le v mejah teh pristojnosti.
Paragraph 2 also confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union as established in the other Parts of the Constitution.
Drugi odstavek tudi potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve področja uporabe prava Unije preko njenih pristojnosti, določenih v drugih delih Ustave.
The Court of Justice has already established this rule with respect to the fundamental rights recognised as part of Union law (judgment of 17 February 1998, C-249/96 Grant, 1998 ECR I-621, paragraph 45 of the grounds).
Sodišče je že opredelilo to pravilo v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, ki štejejo kot del prava Unije (sodba z dne 17. februarja 1998, C-249/96 Grant, 1998 PSES I-621, odstavek 45 obrazložitve).
In accordance with this rule, it goes without saying that the incorporation of the Charter into the Constitution cannot be understood as extending by itself the range of Member State action considered to be &quot;implementation of Union law&quot; (within the meaning of paragraph 1 and the above-mentioned case law).
V skladu s tem pravilom je samoumevno, da vključitev Listine v Ustavo ne more sama po sebi pomeniti širitve obsega ukrepov držav članic, ki štejejo kot »izvajanje prava Unije« (v smislu prvega odstavka in zgoraj navedene sodne prakse).
The purpose of Article 52 is to set the scope of the rights and principles of the Charter, and to lay down rules for their interpretation.
Namen člena 52 je opredeliti obseg pravic in načel Listine ter določiti pravila za njihovo razlago.
Paragraph 1 deals with the arrangements for the limitation of rights.
Prvi odstavek obravnava podrobnosti glede omejevanja pravic.
The wording is based on the case law of the Court of Justice:
Besedilo temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča:
it is well established in the case law of the Court that restrictions may be imposed on the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular in the context of a common organisation of the market, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute, with regard to the aim pursued, disproportionate and unreasonable interference undermining the very substance of those rights&quot; (judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, paragraph 45 of the grounds).
»...skladno z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je mogoče uvesti omejitve pri uresničevanju temeljnih pravic, zlasti v okviru skupne ureditve trga, pod pogojem, da navedene omejitve dejansko ustrezajo ciljem splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, in da ne povzročajo glede na želeni cilj čezmernega in neutemeljenega motenja, ki bi ogrožalo samo bistvo navedenih pravic« (sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, zadeva C-292/97, odstavek 45 obrazložitve).
The reference to general interests recognised by the Union covers both the objectives mentioned in Article I-2 of the Constitution and other interests protected by specific provisions of the Constitution such as Articles I-5(1), III-133(3), III-154 and III-436.
Sklicevanje na splošne interese, ki jih priznava Unija, zajema cilje iz I-2 člena in druge interese, ki so zaščiteni s posebnimi določbami Ustave, na primer prvim odstavkom I-5. člena, tretjim odstavkom III-133. člena in III-154. ter III-436. členom.
Paragraph 2 refers to rights which were already expressly guaranteed in the Treaty establishing the European Community and have been recognised in the Charter, and which are now found in other Parts of the Constitution (notably the rights derived from Union citizenship).
Drugi odstavek se nanaša na pravice, ki jih že izrecno zagotavlja Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in priznava Listina in se sedaj nahajajo v drugih delih Ustave (predvsem pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije).
It clarifies that such rights remain subject to the conditions and limits applicable to the Union law on which they are based, and for which provision is now made in Parts I and III of the Constitution.
Pojasnjuje, da za takšne pravice še nadalje veljajo pogoji in omejitve, ki se uporabljajo za pravo Unije, na katerem te pravice temeljijo, in ki so sedaj predvideni v I. in III. delu Ustave.
The Charter does not alter the system of rights conferred by the EC Treaty and now taken over by Parts I and III of the Constitution.
Listina ne spreminja sistema pravic, ki so bile dodeljene s Pogodbo ES in so sedaj povzete v I. in III. delu Ustave.
Paragraph 3 is intended to ensure the necessary consistency between the Charter and the ECHR by establishing the rule that, insofar as the rights in the present Charter also correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR, the meaning and scope of those rights, including authorised limitations, are the same as those laid down by the ECHR.
Namen tretjega odstavka je zagotoviti potrebno usklajenost med Listino in EKČP z vzpostavitvijo pravila, da sta vsebina in obseg navedenih pravic, vključno z dovoljenimi omejitvami, enaka kot vsebina in pomen pravic, ki ju določa EKČP, kolikor pravice v tej listini ustrezajo tudi pravicam, zagotovljenim z EKČP.
This means in particular that the legislator, in laying down limitations to those rights, must comply with the same standards as are fixed by the detailed limitation arrangements laid down in the ECHR, which are thus made applicable for the rights covered by this paragraph, without thereby adversely affecting the autonomy of Union law and of that of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
To zlasti pomeni, da mora zakonodajalec pri določanju omejitev navedenih pravic upoštevati enaka merila, določena s podrobno ureditvijo o omejitvah, podano v EKČP, ki tako postanejo veljavna za pravice, zajete v tem odstavku, ne da bi to škodilo avtonomiji prava Unije in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The reference to the ECHR covers both the Convention and the Protocols to it.
Sklicevanje na EKČP zajema Konvencijo in njene protokole.
The meaning and the scope of the guaranteed rights are determined not only by the text of those instruments, but also by the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Vsebina in obseg zagotovljenih pravic nista določena le z besedilom navedenih aktov, temveč tudi s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The last sentence of the paragraph is designed to allow the Union to guarantee more extensive protection.
Namen zadnjega stavka v odstavku je Uniji omogočiti, da zagotavlja širše varstvo.
In any event, the level of protection afforded by the Charter may never be lower than that guaranteed by the ECHR.
V vsakem primeru raven varstva, ki jo nudi Listina, ne sme biti nižja od ravni, ki jo zagotavlja EKČP.
The Charter does not affect the possibilities of Member States to avail themselves of Article 15 ECHR, allowing derogations from ECHR rights in the event of war or of other public dangers threatening the life of the nation, when they take action in the areas of national defence in the event of war and of the maintenance of law and order, in accordance with their responsibilities recognised in Articles I-5 (1), III-131, III-262 of the Constitution.
Listina ne vpliva na možnost držav članic, da uporabijo 15. člen EKČP, ki dovoljuje razveljavitve pravic EKČP v primeru vojne ali ob drugi splošni nevarnosti, ki ogroža življenje naroda, če sprejmejo ukrepe na področju nacionalne obrambe v primeru vojne ali na področju vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru v skladu z njihovimi obveznostmi iz prvega odstavka I-5. člena, in III-131. ter III-262. člena Ustave.
The list of rights which may at the present stage, without precluding developments in the law, legislation and the Treaties, be regarded as corresponding to rights in the ECHR within the meaning of the present paragraph is given hereafter.
Seznam pravic, za katere bi lahko v sedanji fazi in brez izključitve razvoja na področju prava, zakonodaje in pogodb, veljalo, da ustrezajo pravicam v EKČP v smislu tega odstavka, je podan v nadaljevanju.
It does not include rights additional to those in the ECHR.
Ne vključuje pravic, ki so dodane pravicam v EKČP.
Articles of the Charter where both the meaning and the scope are the same as the corresponding Articles of the ECHR:
Členi, katerih pomen in področje uporabe sta enaka kot pomen in področje uporabe ustreznih členov EKČP:
? Article 11 corresponds to Article 10 of the ECHR without prejudice to any restrictions which Union law may impose on Member States&apos; right to introduce the licensing arrangements referred to in the third sentence of Article 10(1) of the ECHR
? člen 11 ustreza 10. členu EKČP ne glede na omejitve, ki jih pravo Unije lahko naloži državam članicam glede pravice do uvedbe dogovora o izdaji dovoljenj iz tretjega stavka prvega odstavka 10. člena EKČP;
? Article 19(2) corresponds to Article 3 of the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights
? drugi odstavek člena 19 ustreza 3. členu EKČP, kakor ga razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;
Articles where the meaning is the same as the corresponding Articles of the ECHR, but where the scope is wider:
Členi, katerih pomen je sicer enak kot pomen ustreznih členov EKČP, njihovo področje uporabe pa širše:
? Article 9 covers the same field as Article 12 of the ECHR, but its scope may be extended to other forms of marriage if these are established by national legislation
? člen 9 zajema enako področje kot 12. člen EKČP, vendar pa se njegovo področje uporabe lahko razširi na druge vrste poroke, če slednje predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja;
? Article 12(1) corresponds to Article 11 of the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level
? prvi odstavek člena 12 ustreza 11. členu EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Unije;
? Article 14(1) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to cover access to vocational and continuing training
? prvi odstavek člena 14 ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi, tako da zajema dostop do poklicnega in nadaljnjega usposabljanja;
? Article 14(3) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR as regards the rights of parents
? tretji odstavek člena 14 ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, kar zadeva pravice staršev;
? Article 47(2) and (3) correspond to Article 6(1) of the ECHR, but the limitation to the determination of civil rights and obligations or criminal charges does not apply as regards Union law and its implementation
? drugi in tretji odstavek člena 47 ustrezata prvemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, vendar omejitev na odločanje o civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kazenskih obtožbah ne velja, kar zadeva pravo Unije in njegovo izvajanje;
? Article 50 corresponds to Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level between the Courts of the Member States.
? člen 50 ustreza 4. členu Protokola št. 7 k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Evropske unije med sodišča držav članic;
? Finally, citizens of the European Union may not be considered as aliens in the scope of the application of Union law, because of the prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of nationality.
? končno se državljane Evropske unije ne sme obravnavati kot tujce v okviru področja uporabe prava Unije, in sicer zaradi prepovedi vsakršne diskriminacije glede na državljanstvo.
The limitations provided for by Article 16 of the ECHR as regards the rights of aliens therefore do not apply to them in this context.
Zanje se omejitve, predvidene s 16. členom EKČP v zvezi s pravicami tujcev, v tem okviru ne uporabljajo.
The rule of interpretation contained in paragraph 4 has been based on the wording of Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union (cf. now the wording of Article I-9(3) of the Constitution) and takes due account of the approach to common constitutional traditions followed by the Court of Justice (e.g., judgment of 13 December 1979, Case 44/79 Hauer [1979] ECR 3727; judgment of 18 May 1982, Case 155/79, AM&amp;S, [1982] ECR 1575).
Pravilo o razlagi, vsebovano v četrtem odstavku, temelji na besedilu člena 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (prim. sedaj besedilo tretjega odstavka I-9. člena Ustave) in ustrezno upošteva pristop do skupnih ustavnih tradicij, ki mu sledi Sodišče (npr. sodba z dne 13. decembra 1979, zadeva 44/79 Hauer [1979] PSES 3727; sodba z dne 18. maja 1982, zadeva 155/79, AM&amp;S, [1982] PSES 1575).
Under that rule, rather than following a rigid approach of &quot;a lowest common denominator&quot;, the Charter rights concerned should be interpreted in a way offering a high standard of protection which is adequate for the law of the Union and in harmony with the common constitutional traditions.
Po tem pravilu je treba zadevne pravice iz Listine namesto s strogim pristopom »najnižjega skupnega imenovalca« razlagati na način, ki nudi visoko raven varstva, ustrezno pravu Unije in skladno s skupnimi ustavnimi tradicijami.
Paragraph 5 clarifies the distinction between &quot;rights&quot; and &quot;principles&quot; set out in the Charter.
Peti odstavek pojasnjuje razlikovanje v okviru Listine med »pravicami« in »načeli«.
According to that distinction, subjective rights shall be respected, whereas principles shall be observed (Article 51 (1)).
V skladu s tem razlikovanjem je pravice posameznikov treba spoštovati, medtem ko je načela treba upoštevati (prvi odstavek člena 51).
Principles may be implemented through legislative or executive acts (adopted by the Union in accordance with its powers, and by the Member States only when they implement Union law); accordingly, they become significant for the Courts only when such acts are interpreted or reviewed.
Načela se lahko izvajajo z zakonodajnimi ali izvršilnimi akti (sprejetimi s strani Unije v skladu z njenimi pristojnostmi in s strani držav članic samo pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije); za sodišča postanejo torej pomembna šele ob razlagi ali reviziji teh aktov.
They do not however give rise to direct claims for positive action by the Union&apos;s institutions or Member States authorities.
Vendar niso razlog za neposredne zahteve po pozitivnem ukrepanju institucij Unije ali organov držav članic.
This is consistent both with case law of the Court of Justice (Cf. notably case law on the &quot;precautionary principle&quot; in Article 174 (2) TEC (replaced by Article III-233 of the Constitution): judgment of the CFI of 11 September 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer vs. Council, with numerous references to earlier case law; and a series of judgments on Article 33 (ex-39) on the principles of agricultural law, e.g. judgment of the Court of Justice C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 ECR 1155:
To je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča (prim. zlasti sodno prakso v zvezi s »previdnostnim načelom« iz člena 174(2) PES (se nadomesti s III-233. členom Ustave), sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 11. septembra 2002, T-13/99, Pfizer proti Svetu, s številnimi sklicevanji na prejšnjo sodno prakso, in vrsto sodb v zvezi s členom 33 Pogodbe o ES glede načel kmetijskega prava, npr. sodba Sodišča C-265/85, Van den Berg, 1987 PSES 1155:
scrutiny of the principle of market stabilisation and of reasonable expectations) and with the approach of the Member States&apos; constitutional systems to &quot;principles&quot; particularly in the field of social law.
ocena načela stabilizacije trga in legitimnih pričakovanj) in s pristopom v ustavnih sistemih držav članic do »načel«, zlasti na področju socialnega prava.
For illustration, examples for principles recognised in the Charter include e.g. Articles 25, 26 and 37.
Za ponazoritev, primeri, da se v Listini priznavajo načela, so členi 25, 26 in 37.
In some cases, an Article of the Charter may contain both elements of a right and of a principle, e.g. Articles 23, 33 and 34.
V nekaterih primerih lahko člen Listine vsebuje značilnosti pravic in načel,kot npr. členi 23, 33 in 34.
Paragraph 6 refers to the various Articles in the Charter which, in the spirit of subsidiarity, make reference to national laws and practices.
Šesti odstavek se nanaša na razne člene v Listini, ki se v duhu subsidiarnosti sklicujejo na nacionalne predpise in običaje.
This provision is intended to maintain the level of protection currently afforded within their respective scope by Union law, national law and international law.
Namen te določbe je ohraniti raven varstva, ki jo na svojih področjih uporabe trenutno nudijo pravo Unije, nacionalno pravo in mednarodno pravo.
Owing to its importance, mention is made of the ECHR.
EKČP se omenja zaradi njenega pomena.
This Article corresponds to Article 17 of the ECHR:
Ta člen ustreza 17. členu EKČP:
&quot;Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.&quot;
»Nobene določbe v tej Konvenciji ni mogoče razlagati tako, kot da vsebuje za katerokoli državo, skupino ali posameznika pravico do kakršenkoli dejavnosti ali dejanja, ki je usmerjeno h kršenju katerihkoli pravic ali svoboščin, ki so tu določene, ali k njihovemu omejevanju v večjem obsegu, kot je določeno v tej Konvenciji.«
The Conference agrees that, in its general efforts to eliminate inequalities between women and men, the Union will aim in its different policies to combat all kinds of domestic violence.
Konferenca se strinja, da se Unija v svojih splošnih prizadevanjih za odpravo neenakosti med ženskami in moškimi v okviru svojih različnih politik trudi boriti proti vsem oblikam nasilja v družini.
The Member States should take all necessary measures to prevent and punish these criminal acts and to support and protect the victims.
Države članice morajo sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje in kaznovanje teh kaznivih dejanj ter za podporo in zaščito žrtev.
The Conference considers that in the event that a draft European law or framework law based on Article III-267(2) would affect fundamental aspects of the social security system of a Member State, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system as set out in Article III-136(2), the interests of that Member State will be duly taken into account.
Kadar Konferenca meni, da bi osnutek evropskega zakona ali okvirnega zakona na podlagi drugega odstavka III-267. člena Ustave vplival na temeljne vidike sistema socialne varnosti države članice, vključno z njegovim področjem uporabe, stroški ali finančno strukturo, ali bi vplival na finančno uravnoteženost tega sistema, kot je določeno v drugem odstavku III-136. člena Ustave, se morajo interesi te države članice ustrezno upoštevati.
The Conference recalls that the respect for fundamental rights and freedoms implies, in particular, that proper attention is given to the protection and observance of the due process rights of the individuals or entities concerned.
Konferenca opozarja, da spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin pomeni predvsem posvečanje primerne pozornosti zaščiti in izvajanju procesnih pravic zadevnih posameznikov ali subjektov do predpisanega.
For this purpose and in order to guarantee a thorough judicial review of European decisions subjecting an individual or entity to restrictive measures, such decisions must be based on clear and distinct criteria.
Za ta namen in da se zagotovi temeljit pravni pregled odločitev, zaradi katerih so posamezniki ali subjekti izpostavljeni omejevalnim ukrepom, morajo take odločitve biti osnovane na jasnih in razločnih kriterijih.
These criteria should be tailored to the specifics of each restrictive measure.
Te kriteriji se morajo prilagoditi posebnim pogojem vsakega omejevalnega ukrepa posebej.