natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(3) The court may, at the petitioner&apos;s proposal lodged together with the request for judicial protection, issue a special order staying the execution of the decision referred to in the preceding paragraph until the decision becomes final, if the person who lodged the request proves that the execution would cause him irreplaceable damage.
(3) Sodišče lahko na predlog vlagatelja vložen skupaj z zahtevo za sodno varstvo s posebnim sklepom zadrži izvršitev odločbe iz prejšnjega odstavka do njene pravnomočnosti, če vlagatelj zahteve izkaže, da bi mu zaradi izvršitve nastala nenadomestljiva škoda.
The order shall be served on the person who lodged the request via the misdemeanour authority.
Sklep se vroči vlagatelju po prekrškovnemu organu.
(4) There shall be no appeal against the order refusing the proposal referred to in the preceding paragraph.
(4) Zoper sklep o zavrnitvi predloga iz prejšnjega odstavka ni pritožbe.
(5) Unless otherwise determined by this Chapter, the provisions governing the appellate procedure in ordinary court proceedings shall apply mutatis mutandis to the proceedings involving requests for judicial protection.
(5) Kolikor v tem poglavju ni drugače določeno, se v postopku z zahtevo za sodno varstvo smiselno uporabljajo določbe pritožbenega postopka v rednem sodnem postopku.
Time limit for lodging a request for judicial protection and jurisdiction
Rok za vložitev zahteve za sodno varstvo in pristojnost
(1) A request for judicial protection may be lodged in writing within eight days of the service of a misdemeanour decision with the competent misdemeanour authority.
(1) Zahteva za sodno varstvo se lahko vloži v osmih dneh od vročitve odločbe o prekršku, pisno pri pristojnem prekrškovnem organu.
(2) Jurisdiction for adjudication on requests for judicial protection shall be vested in the locally competent court in the first instance which covers the region where the head office of the misdemeanour authority which issued the decision is based.
(2) Za odločanje o zahtevi za sodno varstvo je krajevno pristojno sodišče prve stopnje, na območju katerega ima sedež prekrškovni organ, ki je izdal odločbo o prekršku.
Content of request for judicial protection and its withdrawal
Vsebina zahteve za sodno varstvo in njen umik
(1) A request for judicial protection shall contain the information and statements laid down in this Act in connection with appeals against misdemeanour decisions (Article 153 of this Act).
(1) Zahteva za sodno varstvo mora vsebovati podatke in navedbe, ki so s tem zakonom določeni za pritožbo zoper odločbo o prekršku (153. člen tega zakona).
(2) A petitioner may withdraw his request for judicial protection before a misdemeanour decision has been issued.
(2) Vlagatelj lahko zahtevo za sodno varstvo umakne do izdaje sodbe o prekršku.
The request&apos;s withdrawal shall not be possible to be revoked.
Umika zahteve ni mogoče preklicati.
(3) It shall be deemed that the person on whom a fine has been imposed has withdrawn his request for judicial protection if he fails to appear in the court hearing to which it was summoned in an appropriate manner and fails to excuse himself for not appearing in court.
(3) Šteje se, da je oseba, ki ji je bila izrečena globa, zahtevo za sodno varstvo umaknila, če ni prišla na zaslišanje na sodišče, na katero je bila pravilno povabljena, izostanka pa ni opravičila.
Reasons for lodging a request for judicial protection
Razlogi za vložitev zahteve za sodno varstvo
A decision issued by a misdemeanour authority may be contested by lodging a request for judicial protection:
Odločbo prekrškovnega organa je mogoče izpodbijati z zahtevo za sodno varstvo:
- if the decision has violated a substantive provision of this Act or the regulation governing the misdemeanour;
- če je bila z odločbo prekršena materialna določba tega zakona ali predpis, ki določa prekršek;
- if a violation has been committed of the provisions governing the proceedings, because the case was not adjudicated by the competent authority, because the perpetrator was not given an opportunity to give a statement on the misdemeanour, because the adjudication or conduct of the proceedings include the participation of a person who in accordance with the law should have been excluded or was excluded, because of a violation of the provisions governing the use of language in the proceedings, because the operative part of the decision is not comprehensible or is in contradiction with itself, or because the decision does not contain all the elements prescribed;
- če je bila storjena kršitev določb postopka, ker ni odločil pristojni organ, ker storilcu ni bila dana možnost, da se izjavi o prekršku, ker je pri odločanju ali vodenju postopka sodelovala oseba, ki bi po zakonu morala biti izločena ali je bila izločena, ker so bile kršene določbe o uporabi jezika v postopku, ker izrek odločbe ni razumljiv ali je sam s seboj v nasprotju ali ker odločba nima vseh predpisanih sestavin;
- due to an erroneous or incomplete establishment of the actual situation, where the request may indicate the new facts and propose new evidence only if the petitioner of the request proves the likelihood that he could not use these facts and evidence within the framework of fast-track proceedings through no fault of his own;
- zaradi zmotne in nepopolne ugotovitve dejanskega stanja, pri čemer se smejo v zahtevi navajati nova dejstva in predlagati novi dokazi le, če vlagatelj zahteve izkaže za verjetno, da jih brez svoje krivde ni mogel uveljaviti v hitrem postopku;
- due to imposed sanctions, deprivation of a pecuniary advantage, and legal costs and a decision on a property claim.
- zaradi izrečenih sankcij, odvzema premoženjske koristi in stroškov postopka in odločitve o premoženjskopravnem zahtevku.
Adjudication by a misdemeanour authority
Odločanje prekrškovnega organa
(1) A request for judicial protection shall not be permitted if it has been lodged by a person who pursuant to this Act has no right to lodge such a request, or if it is established that the request has been withdrawn or re-lodged after withdrawal, or if the request is not permitted pursuant to this Act.
(1) Zahteva za sodno varstvo ni dovoljena, če jo je vložila oseba, ki je po tem zakonu nima pravice vložiti, ali če se ugotovi, da je zahteva umaknjena ali da je bila po umiku ponovno vložena, ali če zahteva po zakonu ni dovoljena.
(2) The misdemeanour authority shall dismiss impermissible or late requests for judicial protection by issuing an order.
(2) Nedovoljeno ali prepozno zahtevo za sodno varstvo prekrškovni organ zavrže s sklepom.
(3) A request for judicial protection to which the provision of the preceding paragraph shall not apply shall be permitted to be lodged against a dismissal order.
(3) Zoper sklep o zavrženju je dovoljena zahteva za sodno varstvo, za katero se ne uporablja določba prejšnjega odstavka.
(4) After receipt of a request, the misdemeanour authority shall, if necessary, supplement the procedure for taking evidence, taking into account the statements included in the request.
(4) Prekrškovni organ po prejemu zahteve po potrebi glede na navedbe v zahtevi dopolni dokazni postopek.
(5) If the misdemeanour authority finds that the request was sent in due time and that it is founded, it may abolish the misdemeanour decision and suspend the proceedings, or substitute the decision for a new one, and notify of this the perpetrator and the person who lodged the request for judicial protection, or serve the new decision.
(5) Če prekrškovni organ ugotovi, da je zahteva pravočasna in utemeljena, lahko odločbo o prekršku odpravi in ustavi postopek ali jo nadomesti z novo odločbo in o tem obvesti storilca in osebo, ki je vložila zahtevo za sodno varstvo oziroma vroči novo odločbo.
(6) If the misdemeanour authority does not abolish or substitute the decision, it shall forward it, together with the record and possible additional evidence, for adjudication to the competent court.
(6) Če prekrškovni organ odločbe ne odpravi ali nadomesti, jo s spisom in morebitnimi dodatnimi dokazi posreduje v odločitev pristojnemu sodišču.
Test of timeliness and permissibility of request by the court
Preizkus pravočasnosti in dovoljenosti zahteve pri sodišču
The court shall issue an order to dismiss a late or impermissible request for judicial protection, if this was not done by the misdemeanour authority.
Prepozno ali nedovoljeno zahtevo za sodno varstvo sodišče s sklepom zavrže, če tega ni storil prekrškovni organ.
Adjudication by the court
Odločanje sodišča
(1) If the court finds that no supplementation of the procedure for taking evidence is necessary and that the reasons referred to in Article 62 of this Act are not in place, it shall pass a judgement refusing the request as unfounded.
(1) Če sodišče spozna, da ni potrebno dopolnjevanje dokaznega postopka ter da niso podani razlogi iz 62. člena tega zakona, s sodbo zahtevo kot neutemeljeno zavrne.
(2) If the court finds that the violations are in place referred to in the first and second indents of Article 62 of this Act, or that the procedure for taking evidence needs to be supplemented in order to establish the actual situation correctly and completely, its shall pass a judgement abolishing the misdemeanour decision and adjudicate on the misdemeanour by itself pursuant to the provisions applying to ordinary court proceedings on misdemeanours, where the misdemeanour decision shall be deemed to be an accusation proposal and the misdemeanour authority shall have the status of a petitioner of the proceedings.
(2) Če sodišče spozna, da so podane kršitve iz prve in druge alinee 62. člena tega zakona oziroma da je za pravilno in popolno ugotovitev dejanskega stanja potrebno dopolniti dokazni postopek, s sodbo odpravi odločbo o prekršku in samo odloči o prekršku po določbah, ki veljajo za redni sodni postopek o prekršku, pri čemer se odločba o prekršku šteje za obdolžilni predlog, prekrškovni organ pa ima položaj predlagatelja postopka.
(3) If the court, within the framework of ordinary court proceedings and on the basis of a supplemented procedure for taking evidence, establishes an actual situation different from that established by the misdemeanour authority, it shall not be bound by the decision issued by the misdemeanour authority in terms of legal definition of the misdemeanour and in terms of the sanction imposed.
(3) Če je sodišče v rednem sodnem postopku na podlagi dopolnjenega dokaznega postopka dejansko stanje ugotovilo drugače, kakor prekrškovni organ, glede pravne opredelitve prekrška in glede izrečene sankcije ni vezano na odločitev prekrškovnega organa.
(4) If the court finds that the decisive facts in the contested misdemeanour decision were established correctly, but that however a different decision must be adopted, subject to the appropriate application of law, regarding the sanction, deprivation of pecuniary advantage and legal costs with respect to the established actual situation, it shall grant the request and amend the relevant parts of the decision.
(4) Če sodišče spozna, da so bila odločilna dejstva v izpodbijani odločbi o prekršku pravilno ugotovljena, da pa je treba glede na ugotovljeno dejansko stanje ob pravilni uporabi zakona drugače odločiti glede sankcije, odvzema premoženjske koristi in stroškov postopka, ugodi zahtevi in v tem delu spremeni odločbo o prekršku.
Right to appeal
Pravica do pritožbe
(1) An appeal for all reasons referred to in Article 154 of this Act shall be possible to be lodged against a court order which has dismissed a request for judicial protection and against an order which on the basis of a supplemented procedure for talking evidence has amended the decision issued by the misdemeanour authority to the detriment of the perpetrator.
(1) Zoper sklep sodišča, s katerim je bila zahteva za sodno varstvo zavržena in zoper sodbo, s katero je bila na podlagi dopolnjenega dokaznega postopka odločba prekrškovnega organa spremenjena v škodo storilca, je dovoljena pritožba iz vseh razlogov, navedenih v 154. členu tega zakona.
(2) An appeal against other decisions passed by the court in the first instance shall be permitted only if the court imposed a fine higher than the minimum fine prescribed for the misdemeanour, secondary sanction or deprivation of a pecuniary advantage, or if the court passed a decision on a property claim.
(2) Zoper druge odločbe sodišča prve stopnje je pritožba dovoljena le, če je bila izrečena višja globa od najnižje predpisane mere za prekršek, stranska sankcija ali odvzem premoženjske koristi ali odločeno o premoženjskopravnem zahtevku.
An appeal may be lodged for the reasons referred to in points 1, 2 and 4 of Article 154 of this Act, except for legal costs.
Vloži se lahko iz razlogov po 1., 2. in 4. točki 154. člena tega zakona, razen glede stroškov postopka.
(3) The appeal referred to in the preceding paragraphs may be lodged by the persons referred to in the first paragraph of Article 59 of this Act.
(3) Pritožbo iz prejšnjih odstavkov lahko vložijo osebe iz prvega odstavka 59. člena tega zakona.
(4) The appeal shall be tried pursuant to the provisions governing the appellate procedure within the framework of ordinary court proceedings.
(4) Pritožbo se obravnava po določbah pritožbenega postopka v rednem sodnem postopku.
ORDINARY COURT PROCEEDINGS
REDNI SODNI POSTOPEK
Unless otherwise determined by this Act, ordinary court proceedings shall be, mutatis mutandis, subject to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act governing:
Kolikor s tem zakonom ni drugače določeno, se v rednem postopku smiselno uporabljajo določbe zakona o kazenskem postopku o:
language during proceedings,
- jeziku v postopku,
applications and records,
- vlogah in zapisnikih,
the serving of letters,
- vročanju pisanj,
time limits,
- rokih,
examinations of the accused,
- zaslišanju obdolženca,
examination of witnesses,
- zasliševanju prič,
forensic issues,
- izvedenstvu,
house and personal search,
- hišni in osebni preiskavi,
seizure and confiscation of items,
- zasegu in odvzemu predmetov,
trial within the framework of summary proceedings before local courts,
- glavni obravnavi v skrajšanem postopku pred okrajnim sodiščem,
deposit and administration of seized items and temporary protection of a request for the deprivation of pecuniary advantage.
- hrambi in upravljanju zaseženih predmetov in začasnem zavarovanju zahtevka za odvzem premoženjske koristi.
Substantive truth principle
Načelo materialne resnice
(1) The court must truthfully and completely establish all the facts relevant to issuing a lawful misdemeanour judgement, except in the case of confession by the accused.
(1) Sodišče mora po resnici in popolnoma ugotoviti vsa dejstva, pomembna za izdajo zakonite sodbe o prekršku, razen v primeru obdolženčevega priznanja.
It must equally diligently investigate all circumstances and thus establish the facts incriminating the accused, as well as the facts to his benefit.
Enako skrbno mora preiskati okoliščine in ugotoviti tako dejstva, ki obdolženca obremenjujejo, kakor tudi dejstva, ki so mu v korist.
(2) The court must see to it that the lack of knowledge or information on the part of the accused and other parties to the proceedings do not affect the rights to which they are entitled in the proceedings.
(2) Sodišče mora poskrbeti, da nevednost ali nepoučenost obdolženca in drugih udeležencev v postopku ni v škodo pravicam, ki jim gredo v postopku.
Examination of the accused
Zaslišanje obdolženca
(1) Before a judgement is issued, the accused must be examined about that of which he has been accused.
(1) Preden se izda sodba o prekršku, mora biti obdolženec zaslišan o tistem, česar je obdolžen.
(2) If a correctly summoned accused person fails to appear for examination and fails to justify his absence, the court may impose a misdemeanour judgement without his examination if it finds that examination is not necessary for passing a correct decision.
(2) Če pravilno povabljeni obdolženec ne pride k zaslišanju in izostanka ne opraviči, lahko sodišče izreče sodbo o prekršku tudi brez njegovega zaslišanja, kadar spozna, da zaslišanje ni potrebno za pravilno odločitev.
Proceedings against legal and responsible persons
Postopek zoper pravno in odgovorno osebo
(1) A uniform proceeding shall be as a rule conducted against legal and responsible persons.
(1) Zoper pravno osebo in odgovorno osebo se vodi praviloma enoten postopek.
(2) If a proceeding against a responsible person is not possible due to legal or actual obstacles, a proceeding shall be conducted against the legal person exclusively.
(2) Če zaradi pravnih ali dejanskih ovir ni mogoče voditi postopka zoper odgovorno osebo, se vodi postopek le zoper pravno osebo.
(3) If the relevant legal person ceased to exist, a proceeding shall be conducted against its responsible person exclusively.
(3) Če je pravna oseba prenehala obstajati, se vodi postopek le zoper odgovorno osebo.
(4) The provisions governing proceedings against legal and responsible person shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to proceedings conducted against individual sole traders and responsible persons.
(4) Določbe o postopku zoper pravno in odgovorno osebo smiselno veljajo tudi v postopku zoper samostojnega podjetnika posameznika in odgovorno osebo.
Free weighing of evidence
Prosta presoja dokazov
While weighing evidence the court shall not be bound by any formal evidence-related rules, nor shall it be limited by them.
Sodišče pri presoji dokazov ni vezano na nobena posebna formalna dokazna pravila in ne z njimi omejeno.
Prohibition of the abuse of rights
Prepoved zlorabe pravic
The court must endeavour to complete the proceedings without any delay and to prevent any abuse of the rights to which the parties to the proceedings are entitled.
Sodišče si mora prizadevati, da izvede postopek brez zavlačevanja in da onemogoči sleherno zlorabo pravic, ki gredo udeležencem v postopku.
Detention of the accused
Pridržanje obdolženca
Within the framework of misdemeanour proceedings the accused may be detained until a misdemeanour judgement or decision is issued, if so determined by the law.
V postopku o prekršku se sme obdolženec pridržati, preden se izda sodba ali sklep o prekršku, če tako določa ta zakon.
(1) An appeal may be lodged with a higher court against a misdemeanour judgement or decision passed in the first instance, unless otherwise determined by this Act.
(1) Zoper sodbo o prekršku, izdano na prvi stopnji, oziroma sklep, izdan na prvi stopnji, je dovoljena pritožba na višje sodišče, če ta zakon ne določa drugače.
(2) There shall be no appeal against a judgement or decision passed by the higher court.
(2) Zoper sodbo oziroma sklep višjega sodišča ni pritožbe.
If an individual act requires to be carried out outside the territory of the court conducting the misdemeanour proceedings, this court may entrust the execution of such an act with another court.
Če je treba posamezno dejanje opraviti izven območja sodišča, ki vodi postopek o prekršku, lahko ta zaupa njegovo izvršitev drugemu sodišču.
Preliminary issue
Predhodno vprašanje
(1) If the applicability of misdemeanour regulations depends on the preliminary decision on a specific legal issue which falls within the jurisdiction of another authority, the court trying a misdemeanour case may decide on this issue on its own pursuant to the provisions applying to evidence-taking in misdemeanour proceedings.
(1) Če je uporaba predpisov o prekršku odvisna od predhodne odločitve o kakšnem pravnem vprašanju, ki je v pristojnosti kakšnega drugega organa, lahko sodišče, ki odloča v zadevi o prekršku, samo odloči tudi o tem vprašanju po določbah, ki veljajo za dokazovanje v postopku o prekršku.
A decision on such a legal issue in misdemeanour proceedings shall have effects exclusively on the misdemeanour case upon which it is decided within the framework of these proceedings.
Odločitev o takšnem pravnem vprašanju v postopku o prekršku ima učinek samo za zadevo o prekršku, o kateri se je odločalo v tem postopku.
(2) The court may not decide on a preliminary issue relating to the existence of a marriage or establishment of paternity, existence of a criminal offence or any other legal issue, if so determined by the law.
(2) Sodišče ne more odločati o predhodnem vprašanju glede obstoja zakonske zveze ali ugotovitve očetovstva, obstoja kaznivega dejanja ali glede kakšnega drugega pravnega vprašanja, če zakon tako določa.
(3) Within the framework of the establishment of existence of a criminal offence, the court shall be bound to the court&apos;s final judgement on the basis of which the accused has been found guilty of committing a criminal offence.
(3) Glede obstoja kaznivega dejanja je sodišče vezano na pravnomočno sodbo sodišča, s katero je bil obdolženec spoznan za krivega kaznivega dejanja.
Territorial jurisdiction of courts
Krajevna pristojnost sodišč
(1) Misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the misdemeanour was committed.
(1) Za postopek je pristojno sodišče, na katerega območju je bil prekršek storjen.
(2) Misdemeanour proceedings against a foreign legal person which has a subsidiary in the Republic of Slovenia shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the foreign legal person&apos;s subsidiary is based;
(2) Za postopek o prekršku zoper tujo pravno osebo, ki ima podružnico v Republiki Sloveniji, je krajevno pristojno sodišče, na območju katerega je podružnica tuje pravne osebe;
if the legal person does not have a subsidiary based in the Republic of Slovenia, misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the misdemeanour was committed.
če tuja pravna oseba nima podružnice v Republiki Sloveniji, je za postopek o prekršku pristojno sodišče, na območju katerega je bil prekršek storjen.
(3) If a misdemeanour is committed on a domestic ship or domestic aircraft, misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the domestic port or domestic airport where the perpetrator&apos;s travel ended are based.
(3) Če je bil prekršek storjen na domači ladji ali na domačem letalu, je za postopek pristojno tisto sodišče, na območju katerega je domače pristanišče oziroma domače letališče, v katerem se je končalo potovanje storilca.
If the perpetrator is a member of the crew, misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the ship&apos;s domicile port or aircraft&apos;s domicile airport are based.
Če je storilec član posadke, je za postopek pristojno tisto sodišče, na območju katerega je matično pristanišče ladje oziroma matično letališče letala.
(4) If a misdemeanour is committed in print, misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the writing was printed.
(4) Če je bil prekršek storjen s tiskom, je pristojno sodišče, na katerega območju je bil spis natisnjen.
If this place is unknown or if the writing was printed abroad, misdemeanour proceedings shall fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the printed writing is disseminated.
Če ta kraj ni znan ali je bil spis natisnjen v tujini, je pristojno sodišče, na katerega območju se tiskani spis razširja.
(5) If in accordance with the law the author of the writing is liable, misdemeanour proceedings shall also fall within the jurisdiction of the court in whose territory the author has permanent residence or the court in whose territory the event occurred to which the writing refers.
(5) Če je po zakonu odgovoren pisec spisa, je pristojno tudi sodišče kraja, v katerem ima pisec stalno prebivališče, ali sodišče kraja, v katerem se je pripetil dogodek, na katerega se spis nanaša.
(6) The provisions of paragraph 4 and 5 of this article shall also apply, mutatis mutandis, to cases where the writing or statement were published on radio or television, the Internet and the World Wide Web.
(6) Določbe četrtega in petega odstavka tega člena se smiselno uporabljajo tudi v primeru, če sta bila spis ali izjava objavljena po radiu ali televiziji, medmrežju in spletnih straneh.