natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
13.3 Without prejudice to the obligation to afford reasonable opportunity for consultation, these provisions regarding consultations are not intended to prevent the authorities of a Member from proceeding expeditiously with regard to initiating the investigation, reaching preliminary or final determinations, whether affirmative or negative, or from applying provisional or final measures, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
13.3 Brez poseganja v obveznost dati razumno priložnost za posvetovanje te določbe v zvezi s posvetovanjem nimajo namena preprečevati oblastem članice, da ravnajo hitro pri uvedbi preiskave, doseganju predhodnih ali končnih ugotovitev, pritrdilnih ali odklonilnih, ali v zvezi z uporabo začasnih ali dokončnih ukrepov v skladu z določbami tega sporazuma.
13.4 The Member which intends to initiate any investigation or is conducting such an investigation shall permit, upon request, the Member or Members the products of which are subject to such investigation access to non confidential evidence, including the non confidential summary of confidential data being used for initiating or conducting the investigation.
13.4 Članica, ki ima namen sprožiti ali je že sprožila preiskavo, mora na zahtevo dovoliti članici ali članicam, katerih proizvodi so predmet preiskave, dostop do dokazov, ki niso zaupni, vključno z nezaupnim povzetkom zaupnih podatkov, ki so podlaga za začetek ali vodenje preiskave.
Calculation of the Amount of a Subsidy in Terms of the Benefit to the Recipient
Izračun višine subvencije v smislu koristi za prejemnika
For the purpose of Part V, any method used by the investigating authority to calculate the benefit to the recipient conferred pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 1 shall be provided for in the national legislation or implementing regulations of the Member concerned and its application to each particular case shall be transparent and adequately explained.
Za namene V. dela mora biti katerakoli metoda, ki jo uporabljajo preiskovalne oblasti z namenom, da ugotovijo koristi za prejemnika v smislu prvega odstavka 1. člena, določena z nacionalno zakonodajo ali izvedbenimi predpisi članice ter mora biti uporaba te metode v vsakem primeru pregledna in ustrezno obrazložena.
Furthermore, any such method shall be consistent with the following guidelines:
Vsaka taka metoda upošteva te smernice:
(a) government provision of equity capital shall not be considered as conferring a benefit, unless the investment decision can be regarded as inconsistent with the usual investment practice (including for the provision of risk capital) of private investors in the territory of that Member;
(a) kapitalski vložek vlade ne velja kot vir koristi, če odločitev o vlaganju ne odstopa od običajne vlagateljske prakse (ki vključuje tudi zagotavljanje rizičnega kapitala) zasebnih vlagateljev na ozemlju članice;
(b) a loan by a government shall not be considered as conferring a benefit, unless there is a difference between the amount that the firm receiving the loan pays on the government loan and the amount the firm would pay on a comparable commercial loan which the firm could actually obtain on the market.
(b) posojilo vlade ne velja kot vir koristi, razen če obstaja razlika v znesku, ki ga podjetje, ki je posojilo prejelo, plača z vladimi posojili in zneskom, ki bi ga podjetje plačalo na osnovi komercialnega posojila, ki ga dejansko lahko dobi na trgu kapitala.
In this case the benefit shall be the difference between these two amounts;
V tem primeru je razlika med tema dvema zneskoma korist;
(c) a loan guarantee by a government shall not be considered as conferring a benefit, unless there is a difference between the amount that the firm receiving the guarantee pays on a loan guaranteed by the government and the amount that the firm would pay on a comparable commercial loan absent the government guarantee.
(c) jamstvo vlade za posojilo ne velja kot vir koristi, razen če obstaja razlika med zneskom, ki ga podjetje, ki je jamstvo dobilo, plača za zajamčeno posojilo vlade, in zneskom, ki bi ga podjetje plačalo na osnovi primerljivega komercialnega posojila brez vladnega jamstva.
In this case the benefit shall be the difference between these two amounts adjusted for any differences in fees;
V tem primeru je korist enaka razliki med tema dvema zneskoma ob upoštevanju razlik v provizijah;
(d) the provision of goods or services or purchase of goods by a government shall not be considered as conferring a benefit unless the provision is made for less than adequate remuneration, or the purchase is made for more than adequate remuneration.
(d) dobava blaga ali storitev ali vladni odkup blaga ne velja kot vir koristi, razen če obstaja dogovor o manj kot zadostnem plačilu ali če se nakup opravi na podlagi večjega plačila, kot je potrebno.
The adequacy of remuneration shall be determined in relation to prevailing market conditions for the good or service in question in the country of provision or purchase (including price, quality, availability, marketability, transportation and other conditions of purchase or sale).
Zadostnost plačila se ugotavlja na podlagi prevladujočih tržnih pogojev za določeno blago ali storitev v državi, v kateri se opravi dobava ali nakup (vključno s ceno, kakovostjo, razpoložljivostjo, tržnostjo, prevozom in drugimi pogoji nakupa ali prodaje).
Determination of Injury[116]
Ugotavljanje škode(45)
15.1 A determination of injury for purposes of Article VI of GATT 1994 shall be based on positive evidence and involve an objective examination of both (a) the volume of the subsidized imports and the effect of the subsidized imports on prices in the domestic market for like products[117] and (b) the consequent impact of these imports on the domestic producers of such products.
15.1 Ugotavljanje škode za namene VI. člena GATT 1994 temelji na podlagi pozitivnih dokazov ter obsega objektivno preučitev (a) obsega subvencioniranega uvoza in učinkov subvencioniranega uvoza na cene enakih proizvodov na domačem trgu(46) in (b) posledičnega vpliva tega uvoza na domače proizvajalce teh proizvodov.
15.2 With regard to the volume of the subsidized imports, the investigating authorities shall consider whether there has been a significant increase in subsidized imports, either in absolute terms or relative to production or consumption in the importing Member.
15.2 V zvezi z obsegom subvencioniranega uvoza preiskovalne oblasti upoštevajo, ali je prišlo do znatne rasti tega uvoza, bodisi absolutno ali v razmerju do proizvodnje ali potrošnje v članici uvoznici.
With regard to the effect of the subsidized imports on prices, the investigating authorities shall consider whether there has been a significant price undercutting by the subsidized imports as compared with the price of a like product of the importing Member, or whether the effect of such imports is otherwise to depress prices to a significant degree or to prevent price increases, which otherwise would have occurred, to a significant degree.
Glede učinkov subvencioniranega uvoza na cene preiskovalne oblasti upoštevajo, ali je nastalo znatno izpodbijanje cen v primerjavi z enakim proizvodom članice uvoznice, ali je učinek v tem, da se cene pomembno znižujejo, ali preprečuje znatno dvigovanje cen, da katerega bi sicer prišlo.
15.3 Where imports of a product from more than one country are simultaneously subject to countervailing duty investigations, the investigating authorities may cumulatively assess the effects of such imports only if they determine that (a) the amount of subsidization established in relation to the imports from each country is more than de minimis as defined in paragraph 9 of Article 11 and the volume of imports from each country is not negligible and (b) a cumulative assessment of the effects of the imports is appropriate in light of the conditions of competition between the imported products and the conditions of competition between the imported products and the like domestic product.
15.3 Če je uvoz več proizvodov iz več kot ene države sočasno predmet preiskave zaradi uvedbe izravnalne carine, smejo preiskovalne oblasti kumulativo presojati učinke takega uvoza samo, če ugotovijo, da je (a) znesek subvencioniranja, ki se ugotovi za uvoz iz vsake države posebej, večji kot de minimis v smislu devetega odstavka 11. člena in da obseg uvoza iz vsake države ni zanemarljiv in (b) kumulativna presoja učinkov uvoza ustrezna glede na konkurenčne pogoje med uvoženimi proizvodi in konkurenčne pogoje med uvoženimi proizvodi in enakimi domačimi proizvodi.
15.4 The examination of the impact of the subsidized imports on the domestic industry shall include an evaluation of all relevant economic factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the industry, including actual and potential decline in output, sales, market share, profits, productivity, return on investments, or utilization of capacity; factors affecting domestic prices; actual and potential negative effects on cash flow, inventories, employment, wages, growth, ability to raise capital or investments and, in the case of agriculture, whether there has been an increased burden on government support programmes.
15.4 Ugotavljanje vplivov subvencioniranega uvoza na domačo industrijo upošteva vse pomembne dejavnike in kazalce, ki se nanašajo na stanje industrije, vključno z dejanskim ali možnim zmanjšanjem proizvodnje, prodaje, dobičkov, produktivnosti, amortizacijo vlaganj, ali izrabe zmogljivosti; dejavnike, ki vplivajo na domače cene, dejanske ali možne negativne učinke na pretok gotovine, na zaloge, mezde, rast, sposobnost pridobivanja kapitala ali vlaganj in, v kmetijstvu, ali je prišlo do povečanega bremena za vlado na podlagi programov domače podpore.
15.5 It must be demonstrated that the subsidized imports are, through the effects[118] of subsidies, causing injury within the meaning of this Agreement.
15.5 Prikazano mora biti, da subvencioniran uvoz z delovanjem(47) subvencij povzroča škodo v smislu tega sporazuma.
The demonstration of a causal relationship between the subsidized imports and the injury to the domestic industry shall be based on an examination of all relevant evidence before the authorities.
Prikaz vzročne zveze med subvencioniranim uvozom in škodo domači industriji temelji na presoji vseh pomembnih dokazov pri oblasteh.
The authorities shall also examine any known factors other than the subsidized imports which at the same time are injuring the domestic industry, and the injuries caused by these other factors must not be attributed to the subsidized imports.
Oblasti morajo upoštevati tudi vse druge znane dejavnike poleg subvencioniranega uvoza, ki prav tako sočasno škodujejo domači industriji, vendar pa škoda, ki jo ti dejavniki povzročajo, ne more biti pripisana subvencioniranemu uvozu.
Factors which may be relevant in this respect include, inter alia, the volumes and prices of non subsidized imports of the product in question, contraction in demand or changes in the patterns of consumption, trade restrictive practices of and competition between the foreign and domestic producers, developments in technology and the export performance and productivity of the domestic industry.
Dejavniki, ki utegnejo biti pomembni za ta primer, med drugim vključujejo obseg in cene nesubvencioniranega uvoza spornega proizvoda, zmanjšanje povpraševanja ali spremembe pri porabi, monopole in konkurenco med domačimi in tujimi proizvajalci, razvoj v tehnologiji in izvozne rezultate in produktivnost domače industrije.
15.6 The effect of the subsidized imports shall be assessed in relation to the domestic production of the like product when available data permit the separate identification of that production on the basis of such criteria as the production process, producers&apos; sales and profits.
15.6 Učinki subvencioniranega uvoza se presojajo v razmerju do domače proizvodnje enakega proizvoda, če razpoložljivi podatki dovoljujejo ločevanje te proizvodnje na podlagi takih meril, kot so proizvodni proces, prodaja in dobiček proizvajalcev.
If such separate identification of that production is not possible, the effects of the subsidized imports shall be assessed by the examination of the production of the narrowest group or range of products, which includes the like product, for which the necessary information can be provided.
Če ni možna taka ločena opredelitev proizvodnje, se vplivi subvencioniranega uvoza presojajo na podlagi proizvodnje najožje skupine ali vrste proizvodov, ki obsega tudi enak proizvod, za katere je možno pridobiti podatke.
In making a determination regarding the existence of a threat of material injury, the investigating authorities should consider, inter alia, such factors as:
Pri ugotavljanju obstoja grožnje materialne škode morajo preiskovalne oblasti med drugim upoštevati te dejavnike:
(i) nature of the subsidy or subsidies in question and the trade effects likely to arise therefrom;
(i) naravo sporne subvencije ali subvencij in posledice za trgovino, ki lahko iz njih nastanejo;
(ii) a significant rate of increase of subsidized imports into the domestic market indicating the likelihood of substantially increased importation;
(ii) bistveno povečanje stopnje subvencioniranega uvoza na domači trg, ki kaže na možnost bistvenega povečanja uvoza;
(iii) sufficient freely disposable, or an imminent, substantial increase in, capacity of the exporter indicating the likelihood of substantially increased subsidized exports to the importing Member&apos;s market, taking into account the availability of other export markets to absorb any additional exports;
(iii) zadostne razpoložljive zmogljivosti ali neizogibno bistveno povečanje zmogljivosti izvoznika, ki kaže na možnost bistvenega povečanja subvencioniranega izvoza na trg članice uvoznice ob upoštevanju drugih izvoznih trgov, ki lahko sprejmejo dodaten izvoz;
(iv) whether imports are entering at prices that will have a significant depressing or suppressing effect on domestic prices, and would likely increase demand for further imports; and
(iv) ali uvoz prihaja s cenami, ki utegnejo imeti bistven zniževalen učinek ali učinek zadrževanja domačih cen, kar bi utegnilo povečati povpraševanje po dodatnem uvozu; in
(v) inventories of the product being investigated.
(v) zaloge proizvoda, ki je predmet preiskave.
No one of these factors by itself can necessarily give decisive guidance but the totality of the factors considered must lead to the conclusion that further subsidized exports are imminent and that, unless protective action is taken, material injury would occur.
Nobeden od teh dejavnikov sam po sebi ne more biti odločilen, toda vsi dejavniki skupaj, ki pridejo v poštev, pa morajo biti podlaga za sklep, da je nadaljnji subvencionirani izvoz neizogiben in da bi nastala materialna škoda, če se ne uvede zaščita.
15.8 With respect to cases where injury is threatened by subsidized imports, the application of countervailing measures shall be considered and decided with special care.
15.8 V primerih, kjer obstaja grožnja škode zaradi subvencioniranja uvoza, je treba s posebno pozornostjo proučiti in sprejeti odločitev o uporabi izravnalnih ukrepov.
16.1 For the purposes of this Agreement, the term &quot;domestic industry&quot; shall, except as provided in paragraph 2, be interpreted as referring to the domestic producers as a whole of the like products or to those of them whose collective output of the products constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic production of those products, except that when producers are related[119] to the exporters or importers or are themselves importers of the allegedly subsidized product or a like product from other countries, the term &quot;domestic industry&quot; may be interpreted as referring to the rest of the producers.
16.1 V tem sporazumu izraz “domača industrija” z izjemo drugega odstavka pomeni domače proizvajalce enakih proizvodov kot celoto ali tiste, katerih skupen proizvod pomeni glavni delež celotne domače proizvodnje teh proizvodov, razen če so proizvajalci v razmerju(48) z izvozniki ali uvozniki ali so sami uvozniki domnevno subvencioniranega proizvoda ali enakega proizvoda iz drugih držav, se izraz “domača industrija” uporabi za preostale proizvajalce.
In exceptional circumstances, the territory of a Member may, for the production in question, be divided into two or more competitive markets and the producers within each market may be regarded as a separate industry if (a) the producers within such market sell all or almost all of their production of the product in question in that market, and (b) the demand in that market is not to any substantial degree supplied by producers of the product in question located elsewhere in the territory.
16.2 V izjemnih primerih je možno ozemlje članice v zvezi z določeno proizvodnjo razdeliti v dva ali več konkurenčnih trgov in je možno proizvajalce na vsakem od teh trgov obravnavati kot ločeno industrijo, če (a) proizvajalci na takem trgu prodajo vso ali skoraj vso proizvodnjo proizvoda, ki je predmet obravnave na tem trgu, in (b) če povpraševanja na tem trgu pretežno ne zadovoljujejo proizvajalci spornega proizvoda z drugih območij.
In such circumstances, injury may be found to exist even where a major portion of the total domestic industry is not injured, provided there is a concentration of subsidized imports into such an isolated market and provided further that the subsidized imports are causing injury to the producers of all or almost all of the production within such market.
V tem primeru je možno ugotoviti škodo, četudi glavni del celotne domače industrije ni oškodovan, pod pogojem, da obstaja koncentracija subvencioniranega uvoza na takem ločenem trgu in pod nadaljnjim pogojem, da subvencioniran uvoz povzroča škodo proizvajalcem vse ali skoraj vse proizvodnje na takem trgu.
16.3 When the domestic industry has been interpreted as referring to the producers in a certain area, i.e. a market as defined in paragraph 2, countervailing duties shall be levied only on the products in question consigned for final consumption to that area.
16.3 Če se domača industrija tako razlaga, da pomeni proizvajalce na določenem območju, t.j. na trgu, ki je opredeljen v drugem odstavku, se izravnalne carine lahko uporabljajo le za sporne proizvode, ki so namenjeni končni porabi na tem območju.
When the constitutional law of the importing Member does not permit the levying of countervailing duties on such a basis, the importing Member may levy the countervailing duties without limitation only if (a) the exporters shall have been given an opportunity to cease exporting at subsidized prices to the area concerned or otherwise give assurances pursuant to Article 18, and adequate assurances in this regard have not been promptly given, and (b) such duties cannot be levied only on products of specific producers which supply the area in question.
Če ustavno pravo članice uvoznice ne dopušča uporabe izravnalnih carin na taki podlagi, članica uvoznica lahko uporabi izravnalne carine brez omejitev, samo če (a) je izvoznikom dana možnost, da prekinejo izvoz na osnovi subvencioniranih cen na določeno območje ali sicer dajo zagotovila v skladu z 18. členom, vendar ta zagotovila niso zadostna ali pravočasna, in (b) se take carine ne morejo uvajati zgolj za proizvode posameznih proizvajalcev, ki so dobavitelji na določenem območju.
16.4 Where two or more countries have reached under the provisions of paragraph 8(a) of Article XXIV of GATT 1994 such a level of integration that they have the characteristics of a single, unified market, the industry in the entire area of integration shall be taken to be the domestic industry referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
16.4 Če sta dve državi ali več držav v skladu z osmim (a) odstavkom XXIV. člena GATT 1994 dosegli tako stopnjo integracije, da imajo naravo skupnega trga, je industrija na celotnem takem območju domača industrija, na katero se nanašata prvi in drugi odstavek.
(a) an investigation has been initiated in accordance with the provisions of Article 11, a public notice has been given to that effect and interested Members and interested parties have been given adequate opportunities to submit information and make comments;
(a) če je sprožena preiskava v skladu z določbami 11. člena ter je dan razglas o tem, zainteresirane članice in drugi zainteresirani subjekti pa so imeli dovolj možnosti, da predložijo informacije in dajo pripombe;
(b) a preliminary affirmative determination has been made that a subsidy exists and that there is injury to a domestic industry caused by subsidized imports; and
(b) če je sprejeta predhodna pritrdilna ugotovitev, da subvencija obstaja in da je povzročena škoda domači industriji zaradi subvencioniranega uvoza; in
(c) the authorities concerned judge such measures necessary to prevent injury being caused during the investigation.
(c) če oblasti presodijo, da so taki ukrepi potrebni, da bi se preprečila škoda med trajanjem preiskave.
17.2 Provisional measures may take the form of provisional countervailing duties guaranteed by cash deposits or bonds equal to the amount of the provisionally calculated amount of subsidization.
17.2 Začasni ukrepi so lahko začasne izravnalne carine, ki se zavarujejo z gotovinskimi pologi ali varščino, ki je enaka višini začasno izračunane subvencije.
17.4 The application of provisional measures shall be limited to as short a period as possible, not exceeding four months.
17.4 Uporaba začasnih ukrepov mora biti omejena na čim krajši čas, ki pa ne sme biti daljši od štirih mesecev.
18.1 Proceedings may[120] be suspended or terminated without the imposition of provisional measures or countervailing duties upon receipt of satisfactory voluntary undertakings under which:
18.1 Postopek se lahko(49) začasno ustavi ali konča, ne da bi prišlo do uporabe začasnih ukrepov ali izravnalnih carin ob zadovoljivih prostovoljnih zavezah, s katerimi:
(a) the government of the exporting Member agrees to eliminate or limit the subsidy or take other measures concerning its effects; or
(a) vlada članice izvoznice pristane na to, da odpravi ali omeji uporabo subvencije ali uporabi druge ukrepe v zvezi z njenim učinkovanjem; ali
(b) the exporter agrees to revise its prices so that the investigating authorities are satisfied that the injurious effect of the subsidy is eliminated.
(b) izvoznik pristane na popravek cen, tako da so preiskovalne oblasti zadovoljne, da so škodljive posledice subvencije odpravljene.
Price increases under such undertakings shall not be higher than necessary to eliminate the amount of the subsidy.
Dvig cen v okviru takih zavez ne sme biti večji, kot je potrebno, da se odpravi subvencija.
It is desirable that the price increases be less than the amount of the subsidy if such increases would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry.
Priporočljivo je, da so dvigi cen manjši od višine subvencije, če bi taki dvigi zadoščali za odpravo škode domači industriji.
18.2 Undertakings shall not be sought or accepted unless the authorities of the importing Member have made a preliminary affirmative determination of subsidization and injury caused by such subsidization and, in case of undertakings from exporters, have obtained the consent of the exporting Member.
18.2 Zaveze se ne smejo zahtevati ali sprejemati, razen če so oblasti članice uvoznice že predčasno pozitivno ugotovile subvencioniranje in škodo, ki jo povzroča tako subvencioniranje, ob zavezah izvoznikov pa samo, če so dobile soglasje članice izvoznice.
18.3 Undertakings offered need not be accepted if the authorities of the importing Member consider their acceptance impractical, for example if the number of actual or potential exporters is too great, or for other reasons, including reasons of general policy.
18.3 Ni nujno, da oblasti sprejmejo ponujeno zavezo, če članica uvoznica meni, da sprejem te zaveze ni izvedljiv, če je npr. število dejanskih ali možnih izvoznikov preveliko ali iz drugih razlogov, vključno z razlogi splošne politike.
18.4 If an undertaking is accepted, the investigation of subsidization and injury shall nevertheless be completed if the exporting Member so desires or the importing Member so decides.
18.4 Če se zaveza sprejme, se preiskava subvencioniranja in škode vendarle konča, če članica izvoznica tako želi ali se članica uvoznica tako odloči.