natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
9.1 If, in the course of implementation of a programme referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 8, notwithstanding the fact that the programme is consistent with the criteria laid down in that paragraph, a Member has reasons to believe that this programme has resulted in serious adverse effects to the domestic industry of that Member, such as to cause damage which would be difficult to repair, such Member may request consultations with the Member granting or maintaining the subsidy.
9.1 Če določena članica med izvajanjem programa, na katerega se nanaša drugi odstavek 8. člena, ne glede na to da program ustreza merilom, ki jih ta odstavek določa, meni, da obstajajo razlogi, zaradi katerih je program povzročil škodljive posledice za domačo industrijo te članice, zlasti težko odpravljive, taka članica lahko zahteva posvetovanja s članico, ki subvencijo daje ali ohranja.
9.2 Upon request for consultations under paragraph 1, the Member granting or maintaining the subsidy programme in question shall enter into such consultations as quickly as possible.
9.2 Če obstaja zahteva za posvetovanja v smislu prvega odstavka, mora članica, ki sporno subvencijo daje, v čim krajšem času začeti posvetovanja.
The purpose of the consultations shall be to clarify the facts of the situation and to arrive at a mutually acceptable solution.
Namen posvetovanj je ugotoviti dejstva in oblikovati vzajemno sprejemljivo rešitev.
9.3 If no mutually acceptable solution has been reached in consultations under paragraph 2 within 60 days of the request for such consultations, the requesting Member may refer the matter to the Committee.
9.3 Če vzajemno sprejemljive rešitve ni možno doseči v posvetovanjih v smislu drugega odstavka v 60 dneh od dneva, ko je zahteva dana, lahko članica, ki je zahtevo dala, zadevo pošlje Odboru.
9.4 Where a matter is referred to the Committee, the Committee shall immediately review the facts involved and the evidence of the effects referred to in paragraph 1. If the Committee determines that such effects exist, it may recommend to the subsidizing Member to modify this programme in such a way as to remove these effects.
9.4 Ko se zadeva pošlje Odboru, Odbor takoj obravnava določena dejstva in dokaze o učinkih, na katere se nanaša prvi odstavek. Če Odbor ugotovi, da taki učinki obstajajo, priporoči članici, ki subvencijo daje, da spremeni program tako, da se taki učinki odpravijo.
The Committee shall present its conclusions within 120 days from the date when the matter is referred to it under paragraph 3. In the event the recommendation is not followed within six months, the Committee shall authorize the requesting Member to take appropriate countermeasures commensurate with the nature and degree of the effects determined to exist.
Odbor sporoči svoje ugotovitve v 120 dneh od dneva, ko je bila zadeva poslana v smislu tretjega odstavka. Če se priporočila ne upoštevajo v 6 mesecih, Odbor dovoli zahtevajoči članici, da uporabi ustrezne protiukrepe, ki so v sorazmerju z naravo in stopnjo učinkov, za katere je ugotovljeno, da obstajajo.
COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
IZRAVNALNI UKREPI
Members shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the imposition of a countervailing duty[107] on any product of the territory of any Member imported into the territory of another Member is in accordance with the provisions of Article VI of GATT 1994 and the terms of this Agreement.
Članice bodo storile vse potrebno, da bo uporaba izravnalnih ukrepov(36) za katerikoli proizvod, ki izvira z ozemlja ene članice in se uvozi na ozemlje druge članice, v skladu z določbami VI. člena GATT 1994 in pogoji tega sporazuma.
Countervailing duties may only be imposed pursuant to investigations initiated[108] and conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Agreement on Agriculture.
Izravnalni ukrepi se lahko uporabljajo le na podlagi preiskav, ki se sprožijo(37) in vodijo v skladu z določbami tega sporazuma in Sporazuma o kmetijstvu.
11.1 Except as provided in paragraph 6, an investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of any alleged subsidy shall be initiated upon a written application by or on behalf of the domestic industry.
11.1 Razen določb šestega odstavka se preiskava, ki ima namen ugotoviti obstoj, stopnjo in učinke katerekoli domnevne subvencije, sproži na podlagi pisne vloge domače industrije ali vloge v njenem imenu.
11.2 An application under paragraph 1 shall include sufficient evidence of the existence of (a) a subsidy and, if possible, its amount, (b) injury within the meaning of Article VI of GATT 1994 as interpreted by this Agreement, and (c) a causal link between the subsidized imports and the alleged injury.
11.2 Vloga, ki je določena v prvem odstavku, mora vsebovati dovolj dokazov o obstoju (a) subvencije, po možnosti tudi o njeni višini, (b) škodi v smislu VI. člena GATT 1994, kot jo razlaga ta sporazum in (c) vzročni zvezi med subvencioniranim uvozom in domnevno škodo.
(ii) a complete description of the allegedly subsidized product, the names of the country or countries of origin or export in question, the identity of each known exporter or foreign producer and a list of known persons importing the product in question;
(ii) popolnim opisom domnevnega subvencioniranega proizvoda, ime države ali držav porekla ali izvoza, istovetnost vsakega znanega izvoznika ali tujega proizvajalca in seznam znanih oseb, ki sporni proizvod uvažajo;
(iii) evidence with regard to the existence, amount and nature of the subsidy in question;
(iii) dokazi o obstoju, znesku in naravi sporne subvencije;
(iv) evidence that alleged injury to a domestic industry is caused by subsidized imports through the effects of the subsidies; this evidence includes information on the evolution of the volume of the allegedly subsidized imports, the effect of these imports on prices of the like product in the domestic market and the consequent impact of the imports on the domestic industry, as demonstrated by relevant factors and indices having a bearing on the state of the domestic industry, such as those listed in paragraphs 2 and 4 of Article 15.
(iv) dokazi, da subvencionirani uvoz povzroča domnevno škodo domači industriji v obliki določenih učinkov subvencij; ti dokazi vsebujejo podatke o rasti obsega domnevnega subvencioniranega uvoza, o učinkih tega uvoza na cene enakih proizvodov na domačem trgu ter o posledičnem vplivu tega uvoza na domačo industrijo, kar izhaja iz ustreznih dejavnikov in kazalcev, ki se nanašajo na stanje domače industrije, naštetih v drugem in četrtem odstavku 15. člena.
11.3 The authorities shall review the accuracy and adequacy of the evidence provided in the application to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to justify the initiation of an investigation.
11.3 Oblasti proučijo točnost in ustreznost dokazov, navedenih v vlogi, da bi ugotovili, ali je dovolj dokazov, ki utemeljujejo uvedbo preiskave.
11.4 An investigation shall not be initiated pursuant to paragraph 1 unless the authorities have determined, on the basis of an examination of the degree of support for, or opposition to, the application expressed[109] by domestic producers of the like product, that the application has been made by or on behalf of the domestic industry.[110] The application shall be considered to have been made &quot;by or on behalf of the domestic industry&quot; if it is supported by those domestic producers whose collective output constitutes more than 50 per cent of the total production of the like product produced by that portion of the domestic industry expressing either support for or opposition to the application.
11.4 Preiskava v smislu prvega odstavka se ne sproži, dokler oblasti na podlagi preverjanja stopnje podpore ali nasprotovanja vlogi(38) domačih proizvajalcev enakega proizvoda ne ugotovijo, da je vlogo vložila domača industrija oziroma je vložena v njenem imenu.(39) Vloga se obravnava, kot da je vložena “s strani ali v imenu domače industrije”, če jo podpirajo domači proizvajalci, katerih skupen proizvod pomeni več kot 50 odstotkov celotne proizvodnje proizvoda, ki ga proizvaja ta del domače industrije, ki podpira ali pa nasprotuje vlogi.
11.6 If, in special circumstances, the authorities concerned decide to initiate an investigation without having received a written application by or on behalf of a domestic industry for the initiation of such investigation, they shall proceed only if they have sufficient evidence of the existence of a subsidy, injury and causal link, as described in paragraph 2, to justify the initiation of an investigation.
11.6 Če se v posebnih primerih oblasti odločijo, da uvedejo postopek preiskave brez predhodne pisne vloge s strani ali v imenu domače industrije za uvedbo takega postopka, smejo nadaljevati s takim postopkom le, če imajo dovolj dokazov o obstoju subvencije, škode in vzročne zveze, kot je določeno v drugem odstavku, ki utemeljuje začetek postopka.
11.7 The evidence of both subsidy and injury shall be considered simultaneously (a) in the decision whether or not to initiate an investigation and (b) thereafter, during the course of the investigation, starting on a date not later than the earliest date on which in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement provisional measures may be applied.
11.7 Dokazi o subvenciji in škodi se obravnavajo sočasno (a) s sklepom o uvedbi ali neuvedbi postopka in (b) med preiskavo, ki se začne najpozneje prvega dne, ko se na podlagi tega sporazuma smejo začeti uporabljati začasni ukrepi.
11.8 In cases where products are not imported directly from the country of origin but are exported to the importing Member from an intermediate country, the provisions of this Agreement shall be fully applicable and the transaction or transactions shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be regarded as having taken place between the country of origin and the importing Member.
11.8 Kadar se proizvod ne uvaža neposredno iz države porekla, temveč se izvozi članici uvoznici po vmesni državi, se določbe tega sporazuma v celoti uporabljajo, pri čemer se za namene tega sporazuma šteje, da je posel ali da so posli potekali neposredno med državo porekla in članico uvoznico.
11.9 An application under paragraph 1 shall be rejected and an investigation shall be terminated promptly as soon as the authorities concerned are satisfied that there is not sufficient evidence of either subsidization or of injury to justify proceeding with the case.
11.9 Vloga v skladu s prvim odstavkom se zavrne, preiskava pa se ustavi takoj, ko pristojne oblasti ugotovijo, da ni dovolj dokazov o subvenciji in škodi, ki bi opravičevali nadaljevanje postopka.
There shall be immediate termination in cases where the amount of a subsidy is de minimis, or where the volume of subsidized imports, actual or potential, or the injury, is negligible.
Postopek se takoj ustavi, če se ugotovi, da je znesek subvencije de minimis, ali če sta obseg subvencioniranega uvoza, dejanskega ali potencialnega, ali škoda neznatna.
For the purpose of this paragraph, the amount of the subsidy shall be considered to be de minimis if the subsidy is less than 1 per cent ad valorem.
Za namene tega odstavka znesek subvencije velja kot de minimis, če je subvencija nižja od 1 odstotka vrednosti proizvoda.
11.10 An investigation shall not hinder the procedures of customs clearance.
11.10 Preiskava ne sme ovirati postopkov carinjenja.
12.1 Interested Members and all interested parties in a countervailing duty investigation shall be given notice of the information which the authorities require and ample opportunity to present in writing all evidence which they consider relevant in respect of the investigation in question.
12.1 Zainteresirane članice in drugi zainteresirani subjekti v preiskavi v povezavi z izravnalnimi carinami imajo pravico, da so obveščeni o podatkih, ki jih oblasti zahtevajo, in pravico, da pisno sporočijo vse dokaze, za katere menijo, da so pomembni za določeno preiskavo.
12.1.1 Exporters, foreign producers or interested Members receiving questionnaires used in a countervailing duty investigation shall be given at least 30 days for reply.[111] Due consideration should be given to any request for an extension of the 30 day period and, upon cause shown, such an extension should be granted whenever practicable.
12.1.1 Izvozniki, tuji proizvajalci ali zainteresirane članice, ki so prejeli vprašalnike v postopku preiskave zaradi uvedbe izravnalnih carin, morajo imeti na voljo vsaj 30 dni za odgovor.(40) Upoštevati je treba zahteve, da se 30-dnevni rok podaljša, in če so razlogi za to, se tako podaljšanje odobri, če je izvedljivo.
12.1.2 Subject to the requirement to protect confidential information, evidence presented in writing by one interested Member or interested party shall be made available promptly to other interested Members or interested parties participating in the investigation.
12.1.2 Ob upoštevanju zahteve po varovanju zaupnih podatkov se dokazi, ki jih pisno predloži zainteresirana članica ali druga zainteresirana stran, takoj dajo drugim zainteresiranim članicam ali stranem, ki sodelujejo v preiskavi.
12.1.3 As soon as an investigation has been initiated, the authorities shall provide the full text of the written application received under paragraph 1 of Article 11 to the known exporters[112] and to the authorities of the exporting Member and shall make it available, upon request, to other interested parties involved.
12.1.3 Takoj ko se preiskava sproži, dajo oblasti na razpolago celotno besedilo pisne vloge, ki so jo prejeli v skladu s prvim odstavkom 11. člena, vsem znanim izvoznikom(41) in oblastem članice izvoznice, na zahtevo pa tudi drugim sodelujočim v postopku.
Due regard shall be paid to the protection of confidential information, as provided for in paragraph 4.
Ustrezno je treba paziti na varovanje zaupnih podatkov, kot je določeno v četrtem odstavku.
Interested Members and interested parties also shall have the right, upon justification, to present information orally.
12.2 Zainteresirane članice in drugi zainteresirani subjekti imajo prav tako iz določenih razlogov pravico dati informacije ustno.
Where such information is provided orally, the interested Members and interested parties subsequently shall be required to reduce such submissions to writing.
Če se informacije dajejo ustno, se od zainteresiranih članic in drugih subjektov pozneje zahteva, da svoje izjave dajo pisno.
Any decision of the investigating authorities can only be based on such information and arguments as were on the written record of this authority and which were available to interested Members and interested parties participating in the investigation, due account having been given to the need to protect confidential information.
Kakršnakoli odločitev preiskovalnih oblasti lahko temelji le na takih informacijah in argumentih, ki so zapisani pri teh oblasteh in so na voljo zainteresiranim članicam in drugim subjektom, ki so udeleženi v postopku, ob upoštevanju potrebe varovanja zaupnih podatkov.
12.3 The authorities shall whenever practicable provide timely opportunities for all interested Members and interested parties to see all information that is relevant to the presentation of their cases, that is not confidential as defined in paragraph 4, and that is used by the authorities in a countervailing duty investigation, and to prepare presentations on the basis of this information.
12.3 Kadarkoli je to izvedljivo, oblasti pravočasno dajo možnost vpogleda vsem zainteresiranim članicam in drugim zainteresiranim subjektom v vse podatke, ki so pomembni za predstavitev njihovega primera, ki pa niso zaupni v smislu četrtega odstavka in jih oblasti uporabljajo v preiskavi uvedbe izravnalne carine, da lahko pripravijo predstavitve na temelju teh podatkov.
12.4 Any information which is by nature confidential (for example, because its disclosure would be of significant competitive advantage to a competitor or because its disclosure would have a significantly adverse effect upon a person supplying the information or upon a person from whom the supplier acquired the information), or which is provided on a confidential basis by parties to an investigation shall, upon good cause shown, be treated as such by the authorities.
12.4 Kakršnekoli zaupne informacije (npr. če bi njihovo razkritje dalo bistveno konkurenčno prednost konkurentu, ali bi tako razkritje imelo škodljive posledice za osebo, ki je take informacije dala, ali za osebo, ki je vir teh informacij), ali ki so dane na zaupni podlagi v postopku, morajo oblasti na utemeljeni osnovi take informacije obravnavati kot zaupne.
Such information shall not be disclosed without specific permission of the party submitting it.[113]
Take informacije se ne smejo razkrivati brez izrecnega dovoljenja tistega subjekta, ki jih je dal.(42)
12.4.1 The authorities shall require interested Members or interested parties providing confidential information to furnish non confidential summaries thereof.
12.4.1 Oblasti zahtevajo od zainteresiranih članic in drugih zainteresiranih subjektov, ki so priskrbeli zaupne informacije, da zagotovijo nezaupne povzetke.
In exceptional circumstances, such Members or parties may indicate that such information is not susceptible of summary.
V izjemnih primerih lahko take članice ali zainteresirani subjekti nakažejo, da take informacije niso primerne za pripravo povzetkov.
12.4.2 If the authorities find that a request for confidentiality is not warranted and if the supplier of the information is either unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized or summary form, the authorities may disregard such information unless it can be demonstrated to their satisfaction from appropriate sources that the information is correct.[114]
12.4.2 Če oblasti ugotovijo, da zahteva za varstvo zaupnosti ni upravičena in če subjekt, ki je vir informacij, ni pripravljen te informacije razkriti ali privoliti v razkritje v splošni ali povzeti obliki, lahko oblasti take informacije spregledajo, razen če je možno na podlagi ustreznih virov na zadovoljiv način ugotoviti, da so informacije točne.(43)
12.5 Except in circumstances provided for in paragraph 7, the authorities shall during the course of an investigation satisfy themselves as to the accuracy of the information supplied by interested Members or interested parties upon which their findings are based.
12.5 Razen pod pogoji, predvidenimi v sedmem odstavku, oblasti med postopkom na zadovoljiv način preverjajo točnost podatkov, ki so jih dale zainteresirane članice in druge zainteresirane strani, ki so osnova za njihove ugotovitve.
12.6 The investigating authorities may carry out investigations in the territory of other Members as required, provided that they have notified in good time the Member in question and unless that Member objects to the investigation.
12.6 Preiskovalne oblasti lahko po potrebi vodijo preiskavo tudi na ozemlju druge članice, če so jo o tem predčasno obvestile in če temu ne nasprotuje.
Further, the investigating authorities may carry out investigations on the premises of a firm and may examine the records of a firm if (a) the firm so agrees and (b) the Member in question is notified and does not object.
Dalje, preiskovalne oblasti lahko opravljajo preiskavo v prostorih podjetja in lahko pregledujejo dokumentacijo podjetja, če: (a) podjetje v to privoli in (b) če je članica obveščena in temu ne nasprotuje.
The procedures set forth in Annex VI shall apply to investigations on the premises of a firm.
Postopki, ki so določeni v Prilogi VI, se uporabljajo tudi ob preiskavi v prostorih podjetja.
Subject to the requirement to protect confidential information, the authorities shall make the results of any such investigations available, or shall provide disclosure thereof pursuant to paragraph 8, to the firms to which they pertain and may make such results available to the applicants.
Razen če se zahteva varovanje zaupnih informacij, oblasti sporočijo rezultate preiskav ali jih razkrijejo v skladu z osmim odstavkom podjetju, na katero se nanašajo, in lahko te rezultate sporočijo tudi vlagateljem zahteve za uvedbo postopka.
12.7 In cases in which any interested Member or interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide, necessary information within a reasonable period or significantly impedes the investigation, preliminary and final determinations, affirmative or negative, may be made on the basis of the facts available.
12.7 Ko katerakoli zainteresirana članica ali zainteresiran subjekt odkloni dostop ali sicer ne zagotovi potrebnih informacij v razumnem roku ali znatno otežuje preiskave, je možno sprejeti predhodne ali končne ugotovitve, pritrdilne ali odklonilne, na podlagi razpoložljivih dejstev.
12.8 The authorities shall, before a final determination is made, inform all interested Members and interested parties of the essential facts under consideration which form the basis for the decision whether to apply definitive measures.
12.8 Pred sprejemom dokončne ugotovitve oblasti obvestijo vse zainteresirane članice in druge subjekte o temeljnih dejstvih, na katerih temelji odločitev o tem, ali je možno uporabiti končne ukrepe.
(i) an exporter or foreign producer or the importer of a product subject to investigation, or a trade or business association a majority of the members of which are producers, exporters or importers of such product; and
(i) izvoznik ali tuji proizvajalec ali uvoznik proizvoda, ki je predmet preiskave, ali trgovinsko ali poslovno združenje, katerega večina članov so proizvajalci, izvozniki ali uvozniki takega proizvoda; in
(ii) a producer of the like product in the importing Member or a trade and business association a majority of the members of which produce the like product in the territory of the importing Member.
(ii) proizvajalec enakega proizvoda na območju članice uvoznice ali trgovinsko ali poslovno združenje, katerih večina članov proizvaja enak proizvod na območju članice, ki je uvoznica.
12.10 The authorities shall provide opportunities for industrial users of the product under investigation, and for representative consumer organizations in cases where the product is commonly sold at the retail level, to provide information which is relevant to the investigation regarding subsidization, injury and causality.
12.10 Oblasti morajo zagotoviti možnost industrijskim uporabnikom proizvoda, ki je predmet preiskave, in organizacijam potrošnikov, v primerih ko gre za proizvod, ki se običajno prodaja na drobno, da pošljejo informacije, ki so pomembne za preiskavo o subvencioniranju, škodi in vzročni zvezi.
13.1 As soon as possible after an application under Article 11 is accepted, and in any event before the initiation of any investigation, Members the products of which may be subject to such investigation shall be invited for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation as to the matters referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 11 and arriving at a mutually agreed solution.
13.1 Kakor hitro je možno, potem ko je vloga v smislu 11. člena sprejeta, v vsakem primeru pa pred uvedbo preiskave, se članice, katerih proizvodi so predmet preiskav, povabijo na posvetovanje z namenom, da se pojasni dejansko stanje v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih vsebuje drugi odstavek 11. člena, in da se oblikuje vzajemno sprejemljiva rešitev.
13.2 Furthermore, throughout the period of investigation, Members the products of which are the subject of the investigation shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to continue consultations, with a view to clarifying the factual situation and to arriving at a mutually agreed solution.[115]
13.2 Med preiskavo morajo članice, katerih proizvodi so predmet preiskav, imeti dovolj možnosti, da nadaljujejo s posvetovanji, z namenom, da se pojasni dejansko stanje in da se doseže vzajemno sprejemljiva rešitev.44