natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The General Affairs Council shall ensure consistency and continuity in the work of the different Council configurations in the framework of multiannual programmes in cooperation with the Commission. The Member States holding the Presidency shall take all necessary measures for the organisation and smooth operation of the Council&apos;s work, with the assistance of the General Secretariat of the Council.
Svet za splošne zadeve, v sodelovanju s Komisijo, zagotavlja v okviru večletnega programiranja usklajenost in kontinuiteto dela različnih sestav Sveta.Predsedujoče države članice ob pomoči generalnega sekretariata Sveta sprejmejo vse ukrepe, potrebne za organizacijo in nemoten potek dela Sveta.
The Council shall adopt a European decision establishing the measures for the implementation of this decision.
Svet sprejme evropski sklep o določitvi izvedbenih ukrepov za ta sklep.
The Conference declares that the European decision relating to the implementation of Article I-25 will be adopted by the Council on the day the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe enters into force.
Konferenca izjavlja, da bo Svet sprejel evropski sklep o izvajanju I-25. člena na dan začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo.
The draft decision is set out below:
Osnutek sklepa je navaden spodaj:
Draft European decision of the Council relating to the implementation of Article I-25
Osnutek sklepa Sveta o izvajanju I-25. člena
(1) Provisions should be adopted allowing for a smooth transition from the system for decision-making in the Council by a qualified majority as defined in the Treaty of Nice and set out in Article 2(2) of the Protocol on the transitional provisions relating to the institutions and bodies of the Union annexed to the Constitution, which will continue to apply until 31 October 2009, to the voting system provided for in Article I-25 of the Constitution, which will apply with effect from 1 November 2009.
(1) Šteje se, da je primerno sprejeti določbe, ki bodo dopuščale nemoten prehod s sistema odločanja v Svetu s kvalificirano večino, kakor je opredeljen v Pogodbi iz Nice in določen v drugem odstavku 2. člena Protokola o prehodnih določbah v zvezi z institucijami in organi Unije, ki je priložen Ustavi in se bo še naprej uporabljal do 31. oktobra 2009, na volilni sistem po 25. členu Ustave, ki se bo začel uporabljati 1. novembra 2009.
(2) It is recalled that it is the practice of the Council to devote every effort to strengthening the democratic legitimacy of decisions taken by a qualified majority.
(2) Opozarja se, da je praksa Sveta takšna, da se po najboljših močeh posveča krepitvi demokratične legitimnosti odločitev, ki se sprejemajo s kvalificirano večino.
(3) It is judged appropriate to maintain this decision as long as is necessary to ensure smooth transition to the new voting system provided for in the Constitution,
(3) Ocenjuje se, da je primerno ohraniti v veljavi sedanji sklep toliko časa, kolikor je potrebno, da bi zagotovili nemoten prehod na nov sistem glasovanja, predviden v Ustavi?
If members of the Council, representing: (a) at least three quarters of the population, or (b) at least three quarters of the number of Member States necessary to constitute a blocking minority resulting from the application of Article I-25(1), first subparagraph, or Article I-25(2), indicate their opposition to the Council adopting an act by a qualified majority, the Council shall discuss the issue.
Če člani Sveta, ki predstavljajo: a) najmanj tri četrtine prebivalstva, ali b) najmanj tri četrtine števila držav članic, potrebnih za manjšino, ki lahko prepreči sprejetje odločitve, ki izhaja iz uporabe prvega ali drugega odstavka I-25. člena, izrazijo nasprotovanje temu, da bi Svet sprejel akt s kvalificirano večino, Svet razpravlja o zadevi.
The Council shall, in the course of these discussions, do all in its power to reach, within a reasonable time and without prejudicing obligatory time limits laid down by Union law, a satisfactory solution to address concerns raised by the members of the Council referred to in Article 1.
Svet med to razpravo stori vse kar lahko, da bi v razumnem roku in ne glede na obvezne roke, določene s pravom Unije, dosegel zadovoljivo rešitev pri obravnavi pomislekov članov Sveta iz prejšnjega člena.
To this end, the President of the Council, with the assistance of the Commission and in compliance with the Rules of Procedure of the Council, shall undertake any initiative necessary to facilitate a wider basis of agreement in the Council. The members of the Council shall lend him or her their assistance.
V ta namen predsednik Sveta ob pomoči Komisije in ob spoštovanju poslovnika Sveta sprejme pobude, potrebne za doseganje širše podlage za soglasje v Svetu. Člani sveta mu nudijo svojo pomoč.
This decision shall take effect on 1 November 2009. It shall remain in force at least until 2014. Thereafter the Council may adopt a European decision repealing it.
Ta sklep začne veljati 1. novembra 2009. Ostane v veljavi vsaj do leta 2014. Potem lahko Svet sprejme evropski sklep o njegovi razveljavitvi.
The Conference considers that when the Commission no longer includes nationals of all Member States, the Commission should pay particular attention to the need to ensure full transparency in relations with all Member States.
Konferenca meni, da naj potem, ko v Komisiji ne bo več državljanov vseh držav članic, Komisija posebno pozornost posveti potrebi po zagotavljanju polne preglednosti v odnosih z vsemi državami članicami.
Accordingly, the Commission should liaise closely with all Member States, whether or not they have a national serving as member of the Commission, and in this context pay special attention to the need to share information and consult with all Member States.
Skladno s tem naj Komisija vzdržuje tesne stike z vsemi državami članicami, ne glede na to, ali je njihov državljan član Komisije ali ne, in v tej zvezi posveča posebno pozornost potrebi po izmenjavi informacij in posvetovanju z vsemi državami članicami.
The Conference also considers that the Commission should take all the necessary measures to ensure that political, social and economic realities in all Member States, including those which have no national serving as member of the Commission, are fully taken into account.
Konferenca prav tako meni, da mora Komisija sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi zagotovi, da se v celoti upošteva politična, socialna in gospodarska stvarnost v vseh državah članicah, tudi tistih, ki med člani Komisije nimajo svojega državljana.
These measures should include ensuring that the position of those Member States is addressed by appropriate organisational arrangements.
S temi ukrepi naj se zagotovi tudi to, da se stališča teh držav članic upoštevajo z ustrezno organizacijsko ureditvijo.
The Conference considers that, in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, the European Parliament and the European Council are jointly responsible for the smooth running of the process leading to the election of the President of the European Commission.
Konferenca meni, da sta Evropski parlament in Evropski svet v skladu z določbami Ustave skupaj odgovorna za nemoten potek postopka za izvolitev predsednika Evropske komisije.
Prior to the decision of the European Council, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council will thus conduct the necessary consultations in the framework deemed the most appropriate.
Pred odločitvijo Evropskega sveta predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta in Evropskega sveta tako opravijo potrebna posvetovanja v okviru, ki velja za najprimernejšega.
These consultations will focus on the backgrounds of the candidates for President of the Commission, taking account of the elections to the European Parliament, in accordance with Article I-27(1).
V skladu s prvim odstavkom I-27. člena se ta posvetovanja osredotočijo na strokovne izkušnje kandidatov za predsednika Komisije, pri čemer se upoštevajo volitve v Evropski parlament.
The arrangements for such consultations may be determined, in due course, by common accord between the European Parliament and the European Council.
Ureditev takih posvetovanj se lahko določi pravočasno z medsebojnim dogovorom med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropskim svetom.
The Conference takes note of the Commission&apos;s intention to continue to consult experts appointed by the Member States in the preparation of draft delegated European regulations in the financial services area, in accordance with its established practice.
Konferenca se seznani z namero Komisije, da nadaljuje s posveti s strokovnjaki, ki jih imenujejo države članice, glede priprave delegiranih evropskih uredb na področju finančnih storitev v skladu z ustaljeno prakso.
Without prejudice to the measures adopted by the Union to comply with its solidarity obligation towards a Member State which is the object of a terrorist attack or the victim of natural or man-made disaster, none of the provisions of Articles I-43 and III-329 of the Constitution is intended to affect the right of another Member State to choose the most appropriate means to comply with its own solidarity obligation towards that Member State.
Ne glede na ukrepe Unije za izpolnitev svojih solidarnostnih obveznosti do države članice, ki je žrtev terorističnega napada, naravne nesreče ali nesreče, ki jo je povzročil človek, nobena od določb I-43. in III-329. člena Ustave ne vpliva na pravico druge države članice, da izbere najbolj primerna sredstva za izpolnitev lastne solidarnostne obveznosti do te države članice.
The Conference declares that, whenever rules on protection of personal data to be adopted on the basis of Article I-51 could have direct implications for national security, due account will have to be taken of the specific characteristics of the matter.
Konferenca izjavlja, da se ustrezno upoštevajo značilnosti zadeve, kadar bi pravila o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki jih je treba sprejeti na podlagi I-51. člena, lahko neposredno vplivala na nacionalno varnost.
It recalls that the legislation presently applicable (see in particular Directive 95/46/EC) includes specific derogations in this regard.
Opozarja, da zakonodaja, ki se trenutno uporablja (glej zlasti Direktivo 95/46/ES), vključuje posebne izjeme glede tega.
The Union will take into account the particular situation of small-sized countries which maintain specific relations of proximity with it.
Unija bo upoštevala posebne okoliščine teritorialno majhnih dežel in z njimi vzdrževala specifične sosedske odnose.
Declaration concerning the explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Izjava o pojasnilih glede Listine o temeljnih pravicah
The Conference takes note of the explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted the Charter and updated under the responsibility of the Praesidium of the European Convention, as set out below.
Konferenca se seznani s pojasnili glede Listine o temeljnih pravicah, oblikovanimi pod vodstvom predsedstva Konvencije, ki je listino sestavil, in dopolnjenimi pod vodstvom predsedstva Evropske konvencije, kakor je navedeno spodaj.
EXPLANATIONS RELATING TO THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
POJASNILA GLEDE LISTINE O TEMELJNIH PRAVICAH
These explanations were originally prepared under the authority of the Praesidium of the Convention which drafted the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Ta pojasnila so bila prvotno pripravljena pod vodstvom predsedstva Konvencije, ki je sestavil osnutek Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
They have been updated under the responsibility of the Praesidium of the European Convention, in the light of the drafting adjustments made to the text of the Charter by that Convention (notably to Articles 51 and 52) and of further developments of Union law.
V luči priprave dopolnitev besedila Listine s strani Evropske konvencije (zlasti členov 51 in 52) in nadaljnjega razvoja prava Unije so bila ta pojasnila posodobljena pod vodstvom predsedstva Evropske konvencije.
Although they do not as such have the status of law, they are a valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
Čeprav sama nimajo pravne veljave, so dragoceno razlagalno orodje, namenjeno pojasnjevanju določb Listine.
The dignity of the human person is not only a fundamental right in itself but constitutes the real basis of fundamental rights.
Človekovo dostojanstvo ni zgolj samo po sebi temeljna pravica, temveč predstavlja osnovo temeljnih pravic.
The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrined human dignity in its preamble:
V Splošni deklaraciji človekovih pravic iz leta 1948 je človekovo dostojanstvo zapisano v preambuli:
&quot;Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.&quot;
»Ker pomeni priznanje prirojenega človeškega dostojanstva vseh članov človeške družbe in njihovih enakih in neodtujljivih pravic temelj svobode, pravičnosti in miru na svetu.«
In its judgment of 9 October 2001 in case C-377/98 Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council, 2001 ECR 7079, at grounds No 70? 77, the Court of Justice confirmed that a fundamental right to human dignity is part of Union law.
V svoji sodbi z dne 9. oktobra 2001 v zadevi C-377/98 Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, 2001 PSES 7079, obrazložitev v točkah št. 70?77, je Sodišče potrdilo, da je temeljna pravica človekovega dostojanstva del prava Unije.
It results that none of the rights laid down in this Charter may be used to harm the dignity of another person, and that the dignity of the human person is part of the substance of the rights laid down in this Charter.
Iz tega izhaja, da se nobena od pravic iz te listine ne sme uporabiti za škodovanje dostojanstvu druge osebe in da je človekovo dostojanstvo del bistva pravic v tej listini.
It must therefore be respected, even where a right is restricted.
Zaradi tega ga je treba spoštovati, tudi kadar je določena pravica omejena.
Paragraph 1 of this Article is based on the first sentence of Article 2(1) of the ECHR, which reads as follows: Everyone&apos;s right to life shall be protected by law…&quot;
Prvo odstavek tega člena temelji na prvem stavku prvega odstavka 2. člena Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP), ki se glasi: Pravica vsakogar do življenja je zavarovana z zakonom....«
The second sentence of the provision, which referred to the death penalty, was superseded by the entry into force of Article 1 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR, which reads as follows: &quot;The death penalty shall be abolished. No-one shall be condemned to such penalty or executed.&quot;
Drugi stavek določbe, ki se nanaša na smrtno kazen, je bil nadomeščen z začetkom veljavnosti 1. člena Protokola št. 6 k EKČP, ki se glasi: »Smrtna kazen se odpravi. Nihče ne sme biti obsojen na takšno kazen ali usmrčen.«
Article 2(2) of the Charter is based on that provision.
Drugi odstavek člena 2 Listine temelji na tej določbi.
The provisions of Article 2 of the Charter correspond to those of the above Articles of the ECHR and its Protocol.
Določbe člena 2 Listine ustrezajo tistim iz zgornjih členov EKČP in njenega Protokola.
They have the same meaning and the same scope, in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter.
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine imajo enak pomen in področje uporabe.
Therefore, the &quot;negative&quot; definitions appearing in the ECHR must be regarded as also forming part of the Charter:
Zato je na »negativne« opredelitve v EKČP prav tako treba gledati kot na sestavni del Listine:
&quot;Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary: (a) in defence of any person from unlawful violence; (b) in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained; (c) in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.&quot;
»Kot kršitev tega člena se ne šteje odvzem življenja, če je posledica uporabe nujno potrebne sile: a) pri obrambi katerekoli osebe pred nezakonitim nasiljem, b) pri zakonitem odvzemu pr ostosti ali pri preprečitvi bega osebi, ki ji je zakonito odvzeta prostost, c) pri zakonitem dejanju, ki ima namen zadušiti upor ali vstajo.«
&quot;A State may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in time of war or of imminent threat of war; such penalty shall be applied only in the instances laid down in the law and in accordance with its provisions…&quot;
»Država lahko določi v svoji zakonodaji smrtno kazen za dejanja, storjena med vojno ali ob neposredni vojni nevarnosti; takšna kazen se sme uporabiti le v primerih, ki so določeni v zakonu in v skladu z določbami zakona..«
In its judgment of 9 October 2001 in case C-377/98 Netherlands v. European Parliament and Council, 2001 ECR 7079, at grounds No 70, 78? 80, the Court of Justice confirmed that a fundamental right to human integrity is part of Union law and encompasses, in the context of medicine and biology, the free and informed consent of the donor and recipient.
V svoji sodbi z dne 9. oktobra 2001 v zadevi C-377/98 Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, 2001, PSES 7079, obrazložitev v točkah št. 70, 78? 80, je Sodišče potrdilo, da je temeljna pravica človekovega dostojanstva del prava Unije in vključuje, v okviru medicine in biologije, svobodno privolitev po predhodni seznanitvi darovalca in prejemnika.
The principles of Article 3 of the Charter are already included in the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, adopted by the Council of Europe (ETS 164 and additional protocol ETS 168).
Načela člena 3 Listine so že vključena v Konvencijo o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z biomedicino, ki jo je sprejel Svet Evrope (ETS 164 in dodatni protokol ETS 168).
The Charter does not set out to depart from those principles, and therefore prohibits only reproductive cloning.
Listine se ne oddaljuje od teh načel in zato prepoveduje le reproduktivno kloniranje.
It neither authorises nor prohibits other forms of cloning.
Drugih oblik kloniranja niti ne odobrava niti ne prepoveduje.
Thus it does not in any way prevent the legislature from prohibiting other forms of cloning.
Zato na noben način zakonodajnim telesom ne preprečuje prepovedi drugih oblik kloniranja.
The reference to eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons, relates to possible situations in which selection programmes are organised and implemented, involving campaigns for sterilisation, forced pregnancy, compulsory ethnic marriage among others, all acts deemed to be international crimes in the Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted in Rome on 17 July 1998 (see its Article 7(1)(g)).
Sklicevanje na evgenične postopke, zlasti tiste, katerih cilj je selekcija ljudi, se nanaša na morebitne razmere, v katerih bi se organizirali in izvajali selekcijski programi, ki bi med drugim vključevali sterilizacijske kampanje, prisilne nosečnosti, obvezne etnične poroke, kar so vse dejanja, ki se po statutu Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, sprejetem v Rimu 17. julija 1998 (glej njegovo točko g), prvega odstavka 7. člena), štejejo za mednarodna kazniva dejanja.
The right in Article 4 is the right guaranteed by Article 3 of the ECHR, which has the same wording: &quot;No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment&quot;.
Pravica v členu 4 je pravica, zagotovljena s 3. členom EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo: »Nikogar se ne sme mučiti ali nečloveško in ponižujoče z njim ravnati ali ga kaznovati.«
By virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter, it therefore has the same meaning and the same scope as the ECHR Article.
Zato ima na podlagi tretjega odstavka člena 52 Listine enak pomen in področje uporabe kot člen EKČP.
The right in Article 5(1) and (2) corresponds to Article 4(1) and (2) of the ECHR, which has the same wording.
Pravica v prvem in drugem odstavku člena 5 ustreza prvemu in drugemu odstavku 4. člena EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo.
It therefore has the same meaning and scope as the ECHR Article, by virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter.
Zato ima v skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine enak pomen in področje uporabe kot člen EKČP.
Consequently:
Zaradi tega:
? no limitation may legitimately affect the right provided for in paragraph 1;
? nobena omejitev ne more legitimno vplivati na pravico, zagotovljeno v prvem odstavku;
? in paragraph 2, &quot;forced or compulsory labour&quot; must be understood in the light of the &quot;negative&quot; definitions contained in Article 4(3) of the ECHR:
? v drugem odstavku je treba »prisilno ali obvezno delo« razumeti v luči »negativnih« opredelitev iz tretjega odstavka 4. člena EKČP:
&quot;For the purpose of this article the term &quot;forced or compulsory labour&quot; shall not include:
»Pojem prisilno ali obvezno delo v zvezi s tem členom ne vključuje:
(a) any work required to be done in the ordinary course of detention imposed according to the provisions of Article 5 of this Convention or during conditional release from such detention;
a) dela, ki se zahteva pri rednem prestajanju zapora v skladu z določbami 5. člena te Konvencije ali med pogojnim odpustom s prestajanja zaporne kazni,
(b) any service of a military character or, in case of conscientious objectors in countries where they are recognised, service exacted instead of compulsory military service;
b) katerekoli službe vojaške narave, službe, ki jo zahtevajo namesto obveznega služenja vojske v državah v katerih je ugovor vesti dopusten,
(c) any service exacted in case of an emergency or calamity threatening the life or well-being of the community;
c) službe, ki je komu dodeljena ob nevarnosti ali ob nesreči, ko je ogroženo življenje ljudi ali blaginja skupnosti,
(d) any work or service which forms part of normal civic obligations.&quot;
d) del ali služb, ki so sestavni del običajnih državljanskih dolžnosti.«
Paragraph 3 stems directly from human dignity and takes account of recent developments in organised crime, such as the organisation of lucrative illegal immigration or sexual exploitation networks.
Tretji odstavek izvira neposredno iz človekovega dostojanstva in upošteva nedavni razvoj organiziranega kriminala, kot so mreže organizacij pridobitniškega nezakonitega priseljevanja ali spolnega izkoriščanja.
The annex to the Europol Convention contains the following definition which refers to trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation:
Priloga h Konvenciji Europol vsebuje naslednje opredelitve, ki se nanašajo na trgovino z namenom spolnega izkoriščanja:
&quot;traffic in human beings: means subjection of a person to the real and illegal sway of other persons by using violence or menaces or by abuse of authority or intrigue with a view to the exploitation of prostitution, forms of sexual exploitation and assault of minors or trade in abandoned children&quot;.
»trgovina z ljudmi pomeni izpostavljanje osebe pravemu in nezakonitemu vplivu drugih oseb z uporabo nasilja ali groženj ali z zlorabo oblasti ali intrigo z namenom izkoriščanja prostitucije, oblik spolnega izkoriščanja in zlorabe mladoletnikov ali trgovine z zapuščenimi otroki«.
Chapter VI of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, which has been integrated into the Union&apos;s acquis, in which the United Kingdom and Ireland participate, contains the following wording in Article 27(1) which refers to illegal immigration networks:
Poglavje 6 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, ki je bilo vključeno v pravni red Unije, v katerem sodelujeta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska, v členu 27(1) vsebuje naslednje besedilo, ki se nanaša na mreže za nezakonito priseljevanje: