natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The principles set out in this Article are based on Article 152 of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-278 of the Constitution, and on Articles 11 and 13 of the European Social Charter.
Načela iz tega člena temeljijo na členu 152 Pogodbe ES, ki se sedaj nadomesti s III-278. členom Ustave, ter na členih 11 in 13 Evropske socialne listine.
The second sentence of the Article takes over Article III-278(1).
Drugi stavek člena ustreza prvemu odstavku III-278. člena.
This Article is fully in line with Article III-122 of the Constitution and does not create any new right.
Ta člen je v celoti usklajen s III-122. členom in ne uvaja nove pravice.
It merely sets out the principle of respect by the Union for the access to services of general economic interest as provided for by national provisions, when those provisions are compatible with Union law.
Določa le načelo, v skladu s katerim Unija spoštuje dostop do služb splošnega gospodarskega pomena, kakor predvidevajo nacionalne določbe, če so navedene določbe združljive s pravom Unije.
The principles set out in this Article have been based on Articles 2, 6 and 174 of the EC Treaty, which have now been replaced by Articles I-3(3), III-119 and III-233 of the Constitution.
Načela iz tega člena so nastala na podlagi členov 2, 6 in 174 Pogodbe ES, ki se sedaj nadomestijo s tretjim odstavkom I-3. člena, III-119. in III-233. členom.
It also draws on the provisions of some national constitutions.
Izhaja tudi iz določb nekaterih nacionalnih ustav.
The principles set out in this Article have been based on Article 153 of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article III-235 of the Constitution.
Načela iz tega člena so nastala na podlagi člena 153 Pogodbe ES, ki se sedaj nadomesti s III-235. členom Ustave.
Article 39 applies under the conditions laid down in Parts I and III of the Constitution, in accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter.
Člen 39 se v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine uporablja pod pogoji, določenimi v I. in II. delu Ustave.
Article 39(1) corresponds to the right guaranteed in Article I-10(2) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-126 for the adoption of detailed arrangements for the exercise of that right) and Article 39(2) corresponds to Article I-20(2) of the Constitution.
Prvi odstavek člena 39 ustreza pravici, zagotovljeni z drugim odstavkom I-10. člena Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-126. členu za sprejetje podrobne ureditve za uresničevanje navedene pravice), drugi odstavek člena 39 pa ustreza I-20. členu Ustave.
This Article corresponds to the right guaranteed by Article I-10(2) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-126 for the adoption of detailed arrangements for the exercise of that right).
Ta člen ustreza pravici iz drugega odstavka I-10. člena Ustave. (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-126. členu za sprejetje podrobne ureditve za uresničevanje navedene pravice).
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter it applies under the conditions set out in these Articles of Parts I and III of the Constitution.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena) 52 Listine se uporablja pod pogoji, določenimi v omenjenih členih I.in III. dela Ustave.
Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the languages of the Constitution and must have an answer in the same language.
Vsakdo se lahko na institucije Unije obrne v enem od jezikov Ustave in mora prejeti odgovor v istem jeziku.
Article 41 is based on the existence of the Union as subject to the rule of law whose characteristics were developed in the case law which enshrined inter alia good administration as a general principle of law (see inter alia Court of Justice judgment of 31 March 1992 in Case C-255/90 P, Burban [1992] ECR I-2253, and Court of First Instance judgments of 18 September 1995 in Case T-167/94 Nölle [1995] ECR II-2589, and 9 July 1999 in Case T-231/97 New Europe Consulting and others [1999] ECR II-2403).
Člen 41 temelji na obstoju Unije kot skupnosti, ki upošteva načela pravne države, katere značilnosti so se razvile v okviru sodne prakse, ki je med drugim utemeljila dobro upravljanje kot splošno pravno načelo (glej med drugim sodbo Sodišča z dne 31. marca 1992 v zadevi C-255/90 P, Burban [1992] PSES I-2253, in sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 18. septembra 1995 v zadevi T-167/94 Nölle [1995] PSES II-2589, in z dne 9. julija 1999 v zadevi T-231/97 New Europe Consulting in drugi [1999] PSES II-2403).
The wording for that right in the first two paragraphs results from the case law (Court of Justice judgment of 15 October 1987 in Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097, paragraph 15 of the grounds, judgment of 18 October 1989 in Case 374/87 Orkem [1989] ECR 3283, judgment of 21 November 1991 in Case C-269/90 TU München [1991] ECR I-5469, and Court of First Instance judgments of 6 December 1994 in Case T-450/93 Lisrestal [1994] ECR II-1177, 18 September 1995 in Case T-167/94 Nölle [1995] ECR II-258) and the wording regarding the obligation to give reasons comes from Article 253 of the EC Treaty, now replaced by Article I-38(2) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-398 of the Constitution for the adoption of legislation in the interest of an open, efficient and independent European administration).
Besedilo navedene pravice v prvih dveh odstavkih izhaja iz sodne prakse (sodba Sodišča z dne 15. oktobra 1987 v zadevi 222/86 Heylens [1987] PSES 4097, odstavek 15 obrazložitve, sodba z dne 18. oktobra 1989 v zadevi 374/87 Orkem [1989] PSES 3283, sodba z dne 21. novembra 1991 v zadevi C-269/90 TU München [1991] PSES I-5469, in sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 6. decembra 1994 v zadevi T-450/93 Lisrestal [1994] PSES II-1177, z dne 18. septembra 1995 v zadevi T-167/94 Nölle [1995] PSES II-258) in besedilo glede obveznosti navedbe razlogov izhaja iz člena 253 Pogodbe ES, ki se sedaj nadomesti z drugim odstavkom I-38. člena Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-398. členu za sprejetje zakonodajnih aktov za odprto, učinkovito in neodvisno evropsko upravo).
Paragraph 3 reproduces the right now guaranteed by Article III-431 of the Constitution.
Tretji odstavek povzema pravico, ki je sedaj zagotovljena s III-431. členom Ustave.
Paragraph 4 reproduces the right now guaranteed by Articles I-10(2)(d) and III-129 of the Constitution.
Četrti odstavek povzema pravico, ki je sedaj zagotovljena s točko d) drugega odstavka II-10. člena in III-129. členom Ustave.
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, those rights are to be applied under the conditions and within the limits defined by Part III of the Constitution.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine je treba navedene pravice uporabljati pod pogoji in v mejah, določenih s III. delom Ustave.
The right to an effective remedy, which is an important aspect of this question, is guaranteed in Article 47 of this Charter.
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, ki je pomemben vidik tega vprašanja, je zagotovljena s členom 47 Listine.
The right guaranteed in this Article has been taken over from Article 255 of the EC Treaty, on the basis of which Regulation 1049/2001 has subsequently been adopted. The European Convention has extended this right to documents of institutions, bodies and agencies generally, regardless of their form, see Article I-50(3) of the Constitution.
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je bila povzeta iz člena 255 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerega je bila naknadno sprejeta Uredba 1049/2001. Evropska konvencija je to pravico razširila na dokumente institucij, organov in agencij v splošnem, ne glede na njihovo obliko (glej tretji odstavek I-50. člena Ustave).
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, the right of access to documents is exercised under the conditions and within the limits for which provision is made in Articles I-50(3) and III-399.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine se pravica dostopa do dokumentov uresničuje pod pogoji in omejitvami, iz tretjega odstavka I-50. člena in III-399. člena.
The right guaranteed in this Article is the right guaranteed by Articles I-10 and III-334 of the Constitution.
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je pravica, zagotovljena s I-10. in III-334. členom Ustave.
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, it applies under the conditions defined in these two Articles.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine se uporablja pod pogoji iz teh dveh členov.
The right guaranteed by paragraph 1 is the right guaranteed by Article I-10(2)(a) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-125; and the judgement of the Court of Justice of 17 September 2002, C-413/99 Baumbast, [2002] ECR 709).
Pravica, zagotovljena s prvim odstavkom, je pravica, zagotovljena s točko a) drugega odstavka I-10. člena Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-125. členu; in sodbo Sodišča z dne 17. septembra 2002, C-413/99 Baumbast, [2002] PSES 709).
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, it applies under the conditions and within the limits defined for which provision is made in Part III of the Constitution.
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine se uporablja pod pogoji in v mejah, določenih v III. delu Ustave.
Paragraph 2 refers to the power granted to the Union by Articles III-265 to III-267 of the Constitution.
Drugi odstavek se nanaša na pristojnost, dodeljeno Uniji s III-265. do III-267. členom Ustave.
Consequently, the granting of this right depends on the institutions exercising that power.
Dodelitev te pravice je zato odvisna od institucij, ki izvajajo to pristojnost.
The right guaranteed by this Article is the right guaranteed by Article I-10 of the Constitution; cf. also the legal base in Article III-127. In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter, it applies under the conditions defined in these Articles.
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je pravica, zagotovljena z I-10. členom Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-127. členu Ustave). V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine se uporablja pod pogoji iz teh členov.
The first paragraph is based on Article 13 of the ECHR:
Prvi odstavek temelji na 13. členu EKČP:
However, in Union law the protection is more extensive since it guarantees the right to an effective remedy before a court.
Vendar pa je varstvo v okviru prava Unije širše, saj zagotavlja pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred sodiščem.
The Court of Justice enshrined that right in its judgment of 15 May 1986 as a general principle of Union law (Case 222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651; see also judgment of 15 October 1987, Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 and judgment of 3 December 1992, Case C-97/91 Borelli [1992] ECR I-6313).
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi z dne 15. maja 1986 navedeno pravico utemeljilo kot splošno načelo prava Unije (zadeva 222/84 Johnston [1986] PSES 1651; glej tudi sodbo z dne 15. oktobra 1987, zadeva 222/86 Heylens [1987] PSES 4097in sodbo z dne 3. decembra 1992, zadeva C-97/91 Borelli [1992] PSES I-6313).
According to the Court, that general principle of Union law also applies to the Member States when they are implementing Union law.
Po mnenju Sodišča se navedeno splošno načelo prava Unije uporablja tudi za države članice pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije.
The inclusion of this precedent in the Charter has not been intended to change the system of judicial review laid down by the Treaties, and particularly the rules relating to admissibility for direct actions before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Vključitev te sodne prakse v Listino ni bila namenjena spremembi sistema sodnega nadzora, določenega v pogodbah, zlasti ne pravil o dopustnosti neposrednih tožb pred Sodiščem Evropske unije.
The European Convention has considered the Union&apos;s system of judicial review including the rules on admissibility, and confirmed them while amending them as to certain aspects, as reflected in Articles III-353 to III-381 of the Constitution, and in particular in Article III-365(4).
Evropska konvencija je preučila sistem sodnega nadzora Unije, vključno s pravili o dopustnosti, ter ga potrdila in hkrati spremenila nekatere njegove vidike, kot je prikazano v III-353. do III-381. členu Ustave, in zlasti v četrtem odstavku III-365. člena Ustave.
Article 47 applies to the institutions of the Union and of Member States when they are implementing Union law and does so for all rights guaranteed by Union law.
Člen 47 se uporablja za institucije Unije in države članice pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije in velja za vse pravice, zagotovljene s pravom Unije.
The second paragraph corresponds to Article 6(1) of the ECHR which reads as follows:
Drugi odstavek ustreza prvemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
&quot;In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
»Vsakdo ima pravico, da o njegovih civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kakršnihkoli kazenskih obtožbah zoper njega pravično in javno ter v razumnem roku odloča neodvisno in nepristransko z zakonom ustanovljeno sodišče.
Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.&quot;
Sodba mora biti izrečena javno, toda tisk in javnost sta lahko izločena iz sojenja deloma ali v celoti v interesu morale, javnega reda ali državne varnosti, če to v demokratični družbi zahtevajo koristi mladoletnikov ali varovanje zasebnega življenja strank, pa tudi tedaj, kadar bi po mnenju sodišča zaradi posebnih okoliščin javnost sojenja škodovala interesom pravičnosti.«
In Union law, the right to a fair hearing is not confined to disputes relating to civil law rights and obligations.
V pravu Unije pravica do poštene obravnave ni omejena na spore, ki se nanašajo na pravice in obveznosti civilnega prava.
That is one of the consequences of the fact that the Union is a community based on the rule of law as stated by the Court in Case 294/83, &quot;Les Verts&quot; v. European Parliament (judgment of 23 April 1986, [1988] ECR 1339).
To je ena od posledic dejstva, da je Unija skupnost, ki temelji na načelih pravne države, kot navaja Sodišče v zadevi 294/83, »Les Verts« proti Evropskemu parlamentu (sodba z dne 23. aprila 1986, [1988] PSES 1339).
Nevertheless, in all respects other than their scope, the guarantees afforded by the ECHR apply in a similar way to the Union.
Kljub temu se jamstva, zagotovljena z EKČP, v vseh pogledih, razen glede njihovega področja uporabe, uporabljajo na podoben način za Unijo.
With regard to the third paragraph, it should be noted that in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, provision should be made for legal aid where the absence of such aid would make it impossible to ensure an effective remedy (ECHR Judgment of 9. 10. 1979, Airey, Series A, Volume 32, 11).
V zvezi s tretjim odstavkom je treba opozoriti na dejstvo, da je v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice potrebno poskrbeti za pravno pomoč, če bi bilo v primeru, da takšne pomoči ni, nemogoče zagotoviti učinkovito pravno sredstvo (sodba EKČP z dne 9. 10. 1979, Airey, serija A, zvezek 32, 11).
There is also a system of legal assistance for cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Obstaja tudi sistem pravne pomoči za zadeve, ki so na Sodišču Evropske unije.
Article 48 is the same as Article 6(2) and (3) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:
Člen 48 je enak drugemu in tretjemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
2) Kdor je obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, velja za nedolžnega, dokler ni v skladu z zakonom dokazana njegova krivda.
(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
c) da se brani sam ali z zagovornikom po lastni izbiri ali če nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo zagovornika, da ga dobi brezplačno, če to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti;
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
d) da zaslišuje oziroma zahteva zaslišanje obremenilnih prič in da doseže navzočnost in zaslišanje razbremenilnih prič ob enakih pogojih, kot veljajo za obremenilne priče;
(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.&quot;
e) da ima brezplačno pomoč tolmača, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, ki se uporablja pred sodiščem.«
In accordance with Article 52(3), this right has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine ima ta pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
This Article follows the traditional rule of the non-retroactivity of laws and criminal sanctions.
Ta člen upošteva običajno pravilo o prepovedi retroaktivnosti zakonov in kazni.
There has been added the rule of the retroactivity of a more lenient penal law, which exists in a number of Member States and which features in Article 15 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Dodano je bilo pravilo retroaktivnosti milejše kazenskega zakona, ki obstaja v številnih državah članicah in je podano v členu 15 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah.
No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed.
1) Nihče ne sme biti obsojen za katerokoli dejanje, izvršeno s storitvijo ali opustitvijo, ki ni bilo določeno kot kaznivo dejanje po domačem ali po mednarodnem pravu v času, ko je bilo storjeno.
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.&quot;
Ta člen ni ovira za sojenje in kaznovanje oseb za kako storitev ali opustitev, ki je bila v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih pravnih načelih, ki jih priznavajo civilizirani narodi.«
In paragraph 2, the reference to &quot;civilised&quot; nations has been deleted; this does not change the meaning of this paragraph, which refers to crimes against humanity in particular.
V drugem odstavku se je črtala beseda »civilizirani«; to ne spreminja pomena tega odstavka, ki se nanaša predvsem na zločine zoper človeštvo.
In accordance with Article 52(3), the right guaranteed here therefore has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.
V skladu z tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine ima tukaj zagotovljena pravica torej enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
Paragraph 3 states the general principle of proportionality between penalties and criminal offences which is enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the Member States and in the case law of the Court of Justice of the Communities.
Tretji odstavek podaja splošno načelo sorazmernosti kazni in kaznivih dejanj, ki je utemeljeno z ustavnimi tradicijami, skupnimi vsem državam članicam, in s sodno prakso Sodišča Skupnosti.
No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that State.
1) Pravosodni organi iste države ne smejo nikogar ne kazensko preganjati ne kaznovati za kaznivo dejanje, za katero je bil na podlagi zakona in v skladu s kazenskim postopkom te države s pravnomočno sodbo že oproščen ali obsojen.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not prevent the reopening of the case in accordance with the law and the penal procedure of the State concerned, if there is evidence of new or newly discovered facts, or if there has been a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings, which could affect the outcome of the case.
Določbe prejšnjega odstavka ne preprečujejo obnove kazenskega postopka na podlagi zakona in skladno s kazenskim postopkom prizadete države, če obstajajo dokazi o novih ali na novo odkritih dejstvih ali pa če je v prejšnjih postopkih prišlo do bistvene napake, ki bi lahko vplivala na izid sojenja.
No derogation from this Article shall be made under Article 15 of the Convention.&quot;
Določila tega člena se ne smejo derogirati s sklicevanjem na 15. člen Konvencije.«
The &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule applies in Union law (see, among the many precedents, the judgment of 5 May 1966, Cases 18/65 and 35/65, Gutmann v. Commission [1966] ECR 103 and a recent case, the decision of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 1999, Joined Cases T-305/94 and others, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV v. Commission [1999] ECR II-931).
Pravilo »non bis in idem« se uporablja v pravu Unije (glej med obsežno sodno prakso sodbo z dne 5. maja 1966, zadevi 18/65 in 35/65, Gutmann proti Komisiji [1966] PSES 103 in za novejšo zadevo sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. aprila 1999, združene zadeve T-305/94 in druge, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV proti Komisiji [1999] PSES II-931).
The rule prohibiting cumulation refers to cumulation of two penalties of the same kind, that is to say criminal law penalties.
Pravilo o prepovedi kumulacije se nanaša na kumulacijo dveh kazni enake vrste, v tem primeru kazni, izrečene na kazenskem sodišču.
In accordance with Article 50, the &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule applies not only within the jurisdiction of one State but also between the jurisdictions of several Member States.
V skladu s členom 50 se pravilo »non bis in idem« ne uporablja zgolj v okviru pristojnosti ene države, temveč tudi v okviru pristojnosti več držav članic.
That corresponds to the acquis in Union law; see Articles 54 to 58 of the Schengen Convention and the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok (not yet published), Article 7 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities&apos; Financial Interests and Article 10 of the Convention on the fight against corruption.
To ustreza pravnemu redu v pravu Unije; glej člene 54 do 58 Schengenske konvencije in sodbo Sodišča z dne 11. februarja 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok, člen 7 Konvencije o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in člen 10 Konvencije o boju proti korupciji.
The very limited exceptions in those Conventions permitting the Member States to derogate from the &quot;non bis in idem&quot; rule are covered by the horizontal clause in Article 52(1) of the Charter concerning limitations.
Zelo omejene izjeme v navedenih konvencijah, ki državam članicam omogočajo izjemo od pravila »non bis in idem«, so določene s horizontalno klavzulo iz prvega odstavka člena 52 Listine glede omejitev.
As regards the situations referred to by Article 4 of Protocol No 7, namely the application of the principle within the same Member State, the guaranteed right has the same meaning and the same scope as the corresponding right in the ECHR.
Kar zadeva razmere iz 4. člena Protokola št. 7 EKČP, tj. uporabo načela v isti državi članici, ima zagotovljena pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot ustrezna pravica v EKČP.
The aim of Article 51 is to determine the scope of the Charter.
Namen člena 51 Listine je opredeliti področje uporabe Listine.
It seeks to establish clearly that the Charter applies primarily to the institutions and bodies of the Union, in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.
Prizadeva si jasno določiti, da se Listina ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti uporablja zlasti za institucije in organe Unije.