natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the following examples, however, the marks were considered visually dissimilar in spite of the fact that they shared some words and/or letters and/or figurative devices, because the shared letters are highly stylised, placed differently and/or there are additional figurative devices.
V naslednjih primerih pa se je štelo, da se znamke vizualno razlikujejo, čeprav so jim skupne nekatere besede in/ali črke in/ali figurativni elementi, ker so skupne črke močno stilizirane, drugače postavljene in/ali ker obstajajo dodatni figurativni elementi.
When comparing figurative signs with word elements visually, it is still possible to find visual similarity when the figurative elements are different (i.e. they do not match or have the same or similar contours) and the word elements are different.
Pri vizualni primerjavi figurativnih znakov z besednimi elementi je mogoče vizualno podobnost ugotoviti tudi, kadar znaki vsebujejo različne figurativne elemente (tj. kadar se ti ne ujemajo ali nimajo enakega ali podobnega obrisa) in različne besedne elemente.
Similarity will be found when the overall stylisation, structure and colour combination render the signs visually similar overall.
Podobnost bo ugotovljena, kadar sta si znaka zaradi celotne stilizacije, strukture in barvne kombinacije na splošno vizualno podobna.
The following example illustrates how similar structure, stylisation and colour combination render signs visually similar.
Naslednji primer ponazarja, kako sta si znaka zaradi podobne strukture, stilizacije in barvne kombinacije vizualno podobna.
3.4.1.5 Word/figurative sign versus figurative sign
Besedno-figurativni znak proti figurativnemu znaku
A coincidence in a figurative element that is visually perceived in an identical or similar way may lead to a visual similarity.
Ujemanje v figurativnem elementu, ki se vizualno zaznava enako ali podobno, lahko vodi do vizualne podobnosti.
The following examples are cases where there are visual similarities because of matching figurative elements.
V naslednjih primerih obstaja vizualna podobnost zaradi ujemajočih se figurativnih elementov.
In the following example the figurative elements were different and the signs were considered visually dissimilar.
V naslednjem primeru sta bila figurativna elementa različna, zato se je štelo, da se znaka vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.1.6 Signs consisting of a single letter
Znaki, sestavljeni iz ene same črke
In cases of conflicting signs consisting of the same single letter, the visual comparison is of decisive importance, these signs being phonetically and usually also conceptually identical.
V primerih sovpadajočih znakov, sestavljenih iz ene same črke, je odločilna vizualna primerjava, saj so ti znaki zvočno in običajno tudi pojmovno enaki.
The fact that the conflicting signs comprise the same single letter can lead to a finding of visual similarity between them, depending on the particular way the letters are depicted.
Ker sta sovpadajoča znaka sestavljena iz ene same iste črke, se lahko ugotovi, da sta vizualno podobna, odvisno od načina, kako je črka prikazana.
In the following examples, the signs were found to be visually similar to a high or medium degree.
V naslednjih primerih je bila ugotovljena visoka ali srednja stopnja podobnosti med znakoma.
In the following cases, the signs were found to be visually similar to a low degree (that resulted, depending on a particular case, both in likelihood of confusion and no likelihood of confusion).
V naslednjih primerih je bila ugotovljena nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti (zaradi česar je ali pa ni obstajala verjetnost zmede, odvisno od primera).
Finally, in the examples below the signs were found to be visually dissimilar due to the different stylisations or graphic elements of the single-letter signs.
Zadnja možnost je, da sta znaka zaradi različne stilizacije ali grafičnih elementov ugotovljena kot vizualno različna, kot v spodnjih primerih.
The final outcomes of these cases were those of no likelihood of confusion.
Končni izid teh zadev je bil, da ne obstaja verjetnost zmede.
It should be pointed out that the verbal representation of ‘one-letter/one-digit sign' is not to be considered equivalent to the sign (e.g. ‘ONE' is not equal to ‘1' or ‘EM' to ‘M').
Treba je opozoriti, da se prikaza „znaka iz ene črke/ene števke“ z besedo ne sme šteti za enakovrednega znaku (npr. beseda „ONE“ ni enakovredna številki „1“ ali beseda „EM“ ni enakovredna „M“).
Therefore, the aforementioned arguments are not directly applicable to such cases.
Zato se zgoraj navedene utemeljitve ne morejo neposredno uporabljati za takšne primere.
Finally, it must be noted that the above considerations also apply to signs consisting of single numbers.
Nazadnje, treba je poudariti, da zgoraj navedeno velja tudi za znake, sestavljene iz ene same številke.
3.4.1.7 Three-dimensional marks
Tridimenzionalne znamke
When comparing three-dimensional and two-dimensional signs, the same basic principles as for two-dimensional marks are to be applied.
Pri primerjavi tridimenzionalnih in dvodimenzionalnih znakov veljajo enaka osnovna načela kot za dvodimenzionalne znamke.
Although the comparative rarity of the three-dimensional sign will usually particularly affect the visual impact of the sign, this must be considered in relation to the overall impression.
Čeprav bo razmeroma redek pojav tridimenzionalnega znaka običajno vplival zlasti na vizualni učinek znaka, je treba to upoštevati pri celotnem vtisu.
In contrast, there is a low degree of visual similarity between the following marks.
Pri naslednjih znamkah pa je v nasprotju s prejšnjimi primeri nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti.
The following marks are visually dissimilar.
Naslednji znamki se vizualno razlikujeta.
3.4.2 Phonetic comparison
Zvočna primerjava
When the opposition is based on earlier signs that enjoy protection in different EU Member States, in principle, account must be taken of all the different pronunciations of the signs by the relevant public in all official languages of those Member States.
Kadar ugovor temelji na prejšnjih znakih, ki so zaščiteni v različnih državah članicah EU, je treba načeloma upoštevati vse različne izgovarjave znakov, kot jih izgovarja upoštevna javnost, v vseh uradnih jezikih zadevnih držav članic.
Local accents are not taken into account.
Lokalni naglasi se ne upoštevajo.
Nevertheless, as already mentioned, when the earlier mark is an EUTM registration, the analysis must in principle extend to the whole EU.
Če pa je prejšnja znamka, kot je bilo že navedeno, registrirana blagovna znamka EU, je treba pri analizi načeloma zajeti celotno EU.
However, where there is a likelihood of confusion for a part of the EU and it is justifiable for reasons of economy of procedure (such as to avoid examining specific pronunciations or meanings of marks in several languages), the Office's analysis need not extend to the whole EU but may instead focus on only a part or parts where there is a likelihood of confusion.
Vendar kadar obstaja verjetnost zmede v delu EU in kadar je to upravičeno zaradi ekonomičnosti postopka (da se izognemo preizkušanju posebnih izgovarjav ali pomenov znamk v več jezikih), Uradu pri analizi ni treba zajeti celotne EU, ampak se lahko osredotoči samo na del ali dele, kjer obstaja verjetnost zmede.
The overall phonetic impression produced by a sign is particularly influenced by the number and sequence of its syllables.
Na celotni zvočni vtis, ki ga ustvarja znak, zlasti vplivata število in zaporedje njegovih zlogov.
The common rhythm and intonation of signs play an important role in how signs are perceived phonetically.
Običajni ritem in intonacija znakov imata pomembno vlogo pri tem, kako se znaki zaznavajo zvočno.
The Collins English Dictionary defines ‘rhythm' as ‘the arrangement of words into a more or less regular sequence of stressed and unstressed or long and short syllables'.
V Collinsovem angleškem slovarju je „ritem“ opredeljen kot razporeditev besed v bolj ali manj redno zaporedje poudarjenih in nepoudarjenih ali dolgih in kratkih zlogov.
‘Intonation' is defined as ‘the sound pattern of phrases and sentences produced by pitch variation in the voice'.
„Intonacija“ je opredeljena kot zvočni vzorec besednih zvez in stavkov, ki nastaja s spreminjanjem višine tona v glasu.
Therefore, the key elements for determining the overall phonetic impression of a trade mark are the syllables and their particular sequence and stress.
Ključni elementi za določitev celotnega zvočnega vtisa blagovne znamke so torej zlogi ter njihovo posebno zaporedje in poudarek.
The assessment of common syllables is particularly important when comparing marks phonetically, as a similar overall phonetic impression will be determined mostly by those common syllables and their identical or similar combination.
Presoja skupnih zlogov je zlasti pomembna, kadar se znamke primerjajo na zvočni ravni, saj bo podobnost celotnega zvočnega vtisa odvisna predvsem od teh skupnih zlogov in njihove enake ali podobne kombinacije.
The following are examples of phonetically dissimilar marks.
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri znamk, ki se zvočno razlikujejo.
The following are examples of phonetically similar/identical marks.
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri zvočno podobnih/enakih znamk.
3.4.2.1 Signs and elements in signs that must be assessed
Znaki in elementi v znakih, ki jih je treba presoditi
The Office conducts a phonetic comparison when both trade marks can be pronounced or have a sound.
Urad opravi zvočno primerjavo, kadar je obe blagovni znamki mogoče izgovoriti oziroma imata zvok.
Accordingly, a figurative mark without word elements cannot, by definition, be pronounced.
Figurativne znamke, ki nima besednih elementov, ni mogoče izgovoriti.
At the very most, its visual or conceptual content can be described orally.
V najboljšem primeru se lahko ustno opiše njena vizualna ali pojmovna vsebina.
In other words, purely figurative marks (i.e. those not containing any word element) are not subject to a phonetic assessment.
Z drugimi besedami, pri povsem figurativnih znamkah (tj. znamkah, ki ne vsebujejo besednega elementa), zvočna presoja ni potrebna.
The ‘meaning' that the image evokes, or its ‘description', will be assessed visually and conceptually.
Pomen, ki ga izraža slika, oziroma njen opis se presodi vizualno in pojmovno.
In this respect, the Office follows the case-law established by the judgments of 07/02/2012, T424/10, Éléphants dans un rectangle, EU:T:2012:58, § 46; 08/10/2014, T342/12, Star, EU:T:2014:858, § 48; 30/09/2015, T364/13, KAJMAN / Device of a crocodile et al., EU:T:2015:738, § 46; 25/11/2015, T320/14, Device of two wavy black lines (fig.) / Device of wavy black link (fig.), EU:T:2015:882, § 45-46.
V tem pogledu Urad sledi sodni praksi, ki se je oblikovala s sodbami z dne 07/02/2012, T424/10, Éléphants dans un rectangle, EU:T:2012:58, § 46; 08/10/2014, T342/12, Star, EU:T:2014:858, § 48; z dne 30/09/2015, T364/13, KAJMAN / Device of a crocodile et al., EU:T:2015:738, § 46; z dne 25/11/2015, T320/14, Device of two wavy black lines (fig.) / Device of wavy black link (fig.), EU:T:2015:882, § 45-46.
The contrary position taken by the Court in the judgment of 07/05/2015, T599/13, GELENKGOLD / FORM EINES TIGERS et al., EU:T:2015:262, § 65 cannot be considered as a prevailing trend until clarification is given by the Court of Justice.
Nasprotno stališče, ki ga je Sodišče zavzelo v sodbi z dne 07/05/2015, T599/13, GELENKGOLD / FORM EINES TIGERS et al., EU:T:2015:262, § 65, se ne more šteti kot prevladujoči trend, dokler Sodišče ne poda pojasnila.
In its decision of 09/07/2015, R 863/2011G, Malta Cross + International + Foundation (fig.) / Malteserkreuz (fig.), § 49, the Grand Board of Appeal excluded the possibility of a direct (pronunciation-based) phonetic comparison of figurative elements.
Veliki odbor za pritožbe je v odločbi z dne 09/07/2015, R 863/2011G, Malta Cross + International + Foundation (fig.) / Malteserkreuz (fig.), § 49, izključil možnost neposredne zvočne primerjave figurativnih elementov (na podlagi izgovarjave).
The Office does not undertake an indirect phonetic comparison, based on the description or a meaning attributed to the image by the public, given that in most cases, it is difficult to define which description the public will attribute to a figurative element and that the comparison based on such a description would lead to a subjective and arbitrary outcome.
Urad ne opravlja posrednih zvočnih primerjav na podlagi opisa ali pomena, ki ga sliki pripisuje javnost, saj je v večini primerov težko opredeliti, kateri opis bo javnost pripisala figurativnemu elementu, zaradi primerjave, ki bi temeljila na takem opisu, pa bi bil izid zadeve subjektiven in arbitraren.
Furthermore, if the phonetic comparison is based on a description of a figurative element or on its meaning, it will only repeat the outcome of the visual or conceptual comparison respectively, where these elements have already been assessed.
Če zvočna primerjava temelji na opisu ali pomenu figurativnega elementa, poleg tega samo ponavlja izid vizualne oziroma pojmovne primerjave, čeprav so bili ti elementi že predmet presoje.
The following are examples of where no phonetic comparison could be made because the marks are purely figurative.
V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri, pri katerih zvočna primerjava ni bila mogoča, ker so znamke povsem figurativne.
Furthermore, when one of the signs has elements that can be read and the other has only figurative elements, the two signs cannot be phonetically compared directly, as in the following examples.
Kadar ima eden od znakov elemente, ki jih je mogoče prebrati, drugi pa le figurativne elemente, znakov ni mogoče neposredno zvočno primerjati, kot je prikazano v naslednjih primerih.
With regard to the pronunciation of figurative elements reminiscent of a letter, it should be noted that the relevant public will tend to read these figurative elements only when they are linked to or form part of a word known to the relevant public, such as in the following examples.
V zvezi z izgovarjavo figurativnih elementov, ki spominjajo na črko, je treba poudariti, da bo upoštevna javnost takšne figurativne elemente navadno prebrala samo, če so povezani z besedo ali če so del besede, ki je upoštevni javnosti znana, kot je to prikazano v naslednjih primerih.
In the following case, however, the figurative element will not be recognised and read as ‘X' and the contested sign read as ‘be light'.
V naslednjem primeru figurativni element ne bo prepoznan in prebran kot „X“, izpodbijani znak pa bo prebran kot „be light“.
As a general rule, all word elements (including letters and numbers) are subject to the phonetic comparison.
Praviloma se zvočno primerjajo vsi besedni elementi (vključno s črkami in številkami).
It may be the case, however, that the relevant public refers aurally to a sign by some elements and omits some words/letters.
Možno pa je, da se upoštevna javnost zvočno sklicuje na znak le z nekaterimi elementi, druge besede ali črke pa izpusti.
For example, in its judgment of 03/07/2013, T206/12, LIBERTE american blend, EU:T:2013:342, the Court found that the public will not pronounce the words ‘american blend' due to their descriptive character.
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 03/07/2013, T206/12, LIBERTE american blend, EU:T:2013:342, na primer ugotovilo, da javnost ne bo izgovorila besed „american blend“, ker sta opisni.
In its judgment of 03/06/2015, in joined cases T544/12, PENSA PHARMA, EU:T:2015:355 and T546/12, pensa, EU:T:2015:355, the Court stated that consumers would not pronounce the word ‘pharma', inasmuch as that word was superfluous because of the nature of the goods and services at issue.
V sodbi z dne 03/06/2015 v združenih zadevah T544/12, PENSA PHARMA, EU:T:2015:355 in T546/12, pensa, EU:T:2015:355 je navedlo, da potrošniki ne bi izgovorili besede „pharma“, saj ta beseda zaradi vrste zadevnega blaga in storitev ni potrebna.
Finally, while words, letters and numbers should in principle be assessed phonetically, some symbols and abbreviations give rise to uncertainty.
Nazadnje je pri besedah, črkah in številkah treba načeloma opraviti zvočno presojo, pri nekaterih simbolih in kraticah pa obstaja negotovost.
For example, the logogram ‘&' (ampersand) will generally be read and pronounced and therefore should be included in the phonetic comparison.
Na primer, logogram „&“ (et) se navadno prebere in izgovori, zato mora biti vključen v zvočno primerjavo.
However, the pronunciation of a given symbol may differ where different languages are concerned.
Vendar se lahko neki simbol v različnih jezikih različno izgovarja.
The same goes for the typographic character @, which in principle will be pronounced.
Enako velja za tipografski znak „@“, ki se bo načeloma izgovoril.
Obviously, the pronunciation of a given symbol may differ where different languages are concerned.
Seveda se lahko neki simbol v različnih jezikih različno izgovarja.
In the above case, it cannot be denied that a part of the relevant public - in particular English speakers - would read the ‘at' symbol and thus pronounce the trade mark as ‘at home'.
V zgornjem primeru ni mogoče zanikati, da bo del upoštevne javnosti - zlasti angleško govoreči - simbol „at“ prebral in torej blagovno znamko izgovoril kot „at home“.
This possibility must, therefore, be taken into consideration, together with other possibilities such as ‘a home' or simply ‘home'.
To možnost je torej treba upoštevati, skupaj z drugimi možnostmi, kot je a home ali preprosto „home“.
However, compare this with the following examples.
Vendar primerjajmo to z naslednjima primeroma.
The plus (+) and minus/hyphen (-) symbols may or may not be pronounced by the relevant public, depending on the circumstances.
Znake za plus (+) in vezaj (-) oziroma minus (-) upoštevna javnost lahko izgovori ali pa ne, odvisno od okoliščin.
In the following examples, the symbol ‘+' in the contested EUTM application would be pronounced as ‘plus'.
V naslednjih primerih bi se znak „+“ v izpodbijani prijavi blagovne znamke EU izgovoril kot plus.
Currency symbols (€, $, ₤, etc.) may also be pronounced when the relevant mark is pronounced.
Tudi simboli za valute (€, $, ₤ itd.) se lahko izgovorijo, kadar se zadevna znamka izgovori.
As an example (fictional), in the United Kingdom the sign ‘₤ 20' would be pronounced as ‘20 pounds'.
Kot (izmišljen) primer, v Združenem kraljestvu bi se znak „₤20“ izgovoril kot „20 pounds“.
Therefore, the signs ‘₤ 20', ‘20 pounds' and ‘twenty pounds' are phonetically identical.
Zato so znaki „₤20“, „20 pounds“ in „twenty pounds“ zvočno enaki.
However, sometimes the way in which symbols - or letters - are used makes it unrealistic to assume that they will be read and pronounced in a particular way, for example, when in a figurative mark a symbol is repeated in order to create a pattern or is highly distorted or when the letters/numbers are otherwise not clearly legible/identifiable.
Vendar je včasih zaradi načina, kako so simboli ali črke uporabljeni, nerealno domnevati, da se bodo prebrali in izgovorili na neki način, kadar se na primer simbol v figurativni znamki ponovi zaradi oblikovanja vzorca, ali je močno popačen, ali pa so črke ali številke slabo berljive ali prepoznavne.
This is illustrated by the following examples.
To je ponazorjeno z naslednjimi primeri.
In summary, whether or not a given symbol/letter is pronounceable depends on the type of character in question, how it is depicted, and how it is combined with other elements of the sign.
Skratka, izgovarjava simbola/črke je odvisna od vrste zadevnega znaka ter od tega, kako je prikazan in kako je povezan z drugimi elementi znaka.
3.4.2.2 Identical/similar sounds in different order
Enaki/podobni glasovi v različnem vrstnem redu
Where the opposing trade marks are formed of syllables or words that are identical or highly similar but in a different order, so that if just one of the syllables or words were rearranged the signs would be identical or highly similar phonetically, the conclusion should be that the signs are phonetically similar.
Kadar sta nasprotujoči si blagovni znamki sestavljeni iz zlogov ali besed, ki so enaki ali zelo podobni, vendar postavljeni v različnem vrstnem redu, tako da bi bila znaka, če bi bil samo eden od zlogov ali ena od besed postavljena na drugo mesto, zvočno enaka ali zelo podobna, je treba ugotoviti, da sta si znaka zvočno podobna.
3.4.2.3 Signs consisting of or including foreign or invented words
Znaki, ki so sestavljeni iz tujih ali izmišljenih besed ali ki vključujejo takšne besede
When a sign contains foreign words, it should be assumed in principle that the relevant public is unfamiliar with how foreign native speakers pronounce their own language.
Kadar znak vsebuje tuje besede, je treba načeloma domnevati, da upoštevna javnost ne ve, kako jih tuji domači govorci izgovarjajo v svojem jeziku.
Accordingly, the public will tend to pronounce a foreign word in accordance with the phonetic rules of their own language.
Javnost bo torej običajno tujo besedo izgovarjala v skladu s fonetičnimi pravili svojega jezika.
However, this will not be the case when the relevant public is familiar with a word, for example in the following scenarios.
Vendar to ne drži, kadar upoštevna javnost besedo pozna, kot to velja za naslednje primere.
When it is an established fact that a foreign language is known by the relevant public.
Kadar je splošno znano, da upoštevna javnost pozna tuji jezik.
For example, the Court has already confirmed that there is at least a basic understanding of the English language by the general public in the Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands and Finland (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23).
Na primer, Sodišče je že potrdilo, da ima širša javnost v skandinavskih državah, na Nizozemskem in Finskem vsaj osnovno znanje angleškega jezika (26/11/2008, T435/07, New Look, EU:T:2008:534, § 23).
When certain terminology is clearly known by the relevant public for certain classes of goods and/or services.
Kadar upoštevna javnost očitno pozna nekatere strokovne izraze za nekatere razrede blaga in/ali storitev.
For example, IT professionals and scientists are generally considered to be more familiar with the use of technical and basic English vocabulary than the average consumer, irrespective of territory (27/11/2007, T434/05, Activy Media Gateway, EU:T:2007:359, § 38, 48 for the IT field (11/12/2008, C57/08 P, EU:C:2008:718, dismissed); 09/03/2012, T207/11, Isense, EU:T:2012:121, § 21-22 for German professionals in the medical field).
Za strokovnjake s področja informacijske tehnologije in znanstvenike se na primer na splošno šteje, da so bolj seznanjeni s tehničnim in osnovnim angleškim besediščem kot povprečni potrošnik, ne glede na ozemlje (27/11/2007, T434/05, Activy Media Gateway, EU:T:2007:359, § 38, 48 za področje informacijske tehnologije; (11/12/2008, C57/08 P, EU:C:2008:718, zavrnjena); 09/03/2012, T207/11, Isense, EU:T:2012:121, § 21-22, za nemške strokovnjake na področju medicine).
When very basic words will be understood in all Member States, such as the English words ‘baby', ‘love', ‘one', ‘surf', the Italian word ‘pizza', which has also entered the English language, etc.
Kadar bo javnost v vseh državah članicah razumela zelo osnovne besede, kot so angleške besede „baby“, „love“, „one“, „surf“, italijansko besedo pizza, ki je tudi postala del angleškega jezika, itd.
Finally, when any one of the parties provides compelling evidence that a word is known by a significant portion of the relevant public.
Nazadnje, kadar ena od strank predloži prepričljiv dokaz, da besedo pozna velik del upoštevne javnosti.
Where a significant part of the relevant public pronounces the foreign word correctly, but another significant part applies the rules of their mother tongue, any assessment of phonetic similarity should mention both pronunciations and provide reasoning.
Če velik del upoštevne javnosti tujo besedo izgovarja pravilno, drug velik del pa uporablja pravila svojega maternega jezika, je treba pri kakršni koli presoji zvočne podobnosti navesti obe izgovarjavi in zagotoviti obrazložitev.