natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the centre of the sign there is a fish skeleton, at the top of which is written the term “fishbone”, and at the bottom the term “beachwear”.
V sredini znaka je ribje okostje, nad njim je napisan izraz fishbone, pod njim pa izraz beachwear.
… although the use of the earlier mark varies in certain items of evidence and is used in a form different from that under which it was registered, in the sense that the sign does not include the term “beachwear”, such a fact does not affect its distinctive character.
[…] čeprav se uporaba prejšnje blagovne znamke razlikuje v nekaterih dokaznih elementih in se uporablja v obliki, ki je drugačna od oblike, v kateri je bila registrirana - v smislu, da znak ne vključuje izraza beachwear -, to ne vpliva na njen razlikovalni značaj.
The term “beachwear”, which means “beach clothing” in English, is descriptive of the nature of the goods covered by the earlier mark [emphasis added].
Izraz beachwear, ki v angleškem jeziku pomeni oblačila za na plažo, opisuje naravo blaga, ki ga označuje prejšnja znamka [dodan poudarek].
That descriptive character is obvious in the case of the “beach clothing” covered by the earlier mark, but also in the case of “t-shirts”, for which the term “beachwear” will immediately be perceived as meaning that it refers to a t-shirt to be worn in casual situations, for example, on the beach in summer.
Navedeni opisni značaj je očiten v primeru oblačil za na plažo, označenih s prejšnjo znamko, vendar tudi v primeru majic s kratkimi rokavi, v zvezi s katerimi bo mogoče izraz beachwear takoj dojeti, kot da se nanaša na majico s kratkimi rokavi, ki se nosi ob vsakdanjih priložnostih, na primer poleti na plaži.
Consumers will thus understand that term as designating the type of goods and will not perceive it as an indication of their commercial origin.
Potrošniki bodo tako izraz razumeli, kot da označuje vrsto blaga, in ga ne bodo dojemali kot označbo njegovega trgovskega izvora.
The fact that the term “beachwear” is written in a more fanciful font than that of the term “fishbone”, which is written in ordinary capital letters, cannot alter such an assessment.
Dejstvo, da je izraz beachwear napisan v bolj nenavadni pisavi kot izraz fishbone, ki je napisan v navadnih velikih črkah, ne more spremeniti takšne presoje.
Furthermore, … the font of the term “beachwear” cannot be regarded as uncommon, since it comprises printed lower-case characters.
Poleg tega pisave izraza beachwear ni mogoče šteti za nenavadno, ker je sestavljena iz malih tiskanih črk.
As for the horizontal position of the term “beachwear” in the earlier mark, which runs in a perpendicular sense across the bottom of a ship's wheel, it is no more graphically incisive than that of the term “fishbone” which, also written horizontally, follows the rounded shape of that wheel' (paras 6263).
Kar zadeva vodoraven položaj izraza beachwear v prejšnji blagovni znamki, ki je pravokotno postavljen na spodnji del ladijskega krmila, ta ni nič bolj grafično vpadljiv od položaja izraza fishbone, ki je prav tako napisan vodoravno in sledi okrogli obliki krmila (točki 62 in 63).
It is not considered that the absence of the word ‘de' affects the distinctive character of the trade mark.
Šteje se, da neuporaba besede „de“ ne vpliva na razlikovalni značaj blagovne znamke.
27/02/2014, T225/12, LIDL express, EU:T:2014:94, paras 4953; appealed 06/09/2016, C237/14 P, LIDL express (fig.) / LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al.
27/02/2014, T225/12, LIDL express, EU:T:2014:94, paras 4953; pritožba 06/09/2016, C237/14 P, in drugi, C237/14 P
The Court confirmed (para. 53) the finding of the Board that the ‘distinctiveness of the mark is largely dominated by the wording ‘LIDL MUSIC' and only marginally influenced by the figurative elements used to represent the letters and the small monogram underneath' (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19).
Sodišče je potrdilo (točka 53) ugotovitev odbora, da razlikovalni učinek znamke izhaja v glavnem iz besedila „LIDL MUSIC“ in da nanj le malo vplivajo figurativni elementi, uporabljeni za prikaz črk, in majhen monogram pod njimi“ (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19).
The omission of the transliteration of the term in Greek characters does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as the form used contains the term APALIA, which is distinctive and dominant.
Opustitev prečrkovanja izraza z grškimi črkami ne spremeni razlikovalnega značaja znamke, saj oblika, ki se uporablja, vsebuje izraz APALIA, ki je razlikovalen in prevladujoč.
‘[T]he absence of the word element ‘TONY' in the first two marks significantly alters the distinctive character of the registered earlier mark ‘TONY HAWK'.
Odsotnost besednega elementa TONY v prvih dveh znamkah bistveno spremeni razlikovalni značaj registrirane prejšnje znamke TONY HAWK.
Therefore, these marks shall be perceived as separate marks and their use cannot be considered as the use of the word mark ‘TONY HAWK'.
Zato je treba ti znamki dojemati kot ločeni znamki, njune uporabe pa ni mogoče šteti za uporabo besedne znamke TONY HAWK“.
(in Spain) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); appeal 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 did not refer to the Spanish trade marks)
(v Španiji) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); pritožba 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 (ni se nanašala na španske blagovne znamke)
‘The earlier trade mark is registered as “SP LA SPOSA”.
Prejšnja blagovna znamka je registrirana kot SP LA SPOSA.
The documents submitted as proof of use refer only to female wedding dresses.
Dokumenti, ki so bili predloženi kot dokaz o uporabi, se nanašajo le na ženske poročne obleke.
The element “LA SPOSA” is a common term, which will be understood by the Italian and Spanish public as “the bride” and has a weak distinctive character for the goods in issue, namely wedding dresses.
Element LA SPOSA je običajen izraz, ki ga bosta italijanska in španska javnost razumeli, kot da pomeni nevesto, in ima šibek razlikovalni značaj za zadevno blago, in sicer poročne obleke.
The opponent itself, in its price list “tarifa de precios” which is drafted in various official languages of the EC, translated this term into the respective languages; underneath the term “LA SPOSA”, the terms “novia” are mentioned in the Portuguese version of the list, “bride” in the English version, “Braut” in the German version, and so on.
Vložnik ugovora je v svojem ceniku izraz tarifa de precios, ki je bil oblikovan v različnih uradnih jezikih Evropske skupnosti, prevedel v zadevne jezike; pod izrazom LA SPOSA so navedeni izrazi novia v portugalski različici cenika, bride v angleški različici, Braut v nemški itd.
This shows that even the respondent itself understands the term “LA SPOSA” as a reference to the consumer targeted, namely the bride' (para. 18).
To kaže, da tudi tožena stranka izraz LA SPOSA razume kot sklicevanje na ciljnega potrošnika, in sicer nevesto (točka 18).
‘Therefore the element “SP” at the beginning of the earlier mark is a distinctive element and cannot be disregarded.
Zato je element SP na začetku prejšnje blagovne znamke razlikovalni element in ga je treba upoštevati.
This element cannot be neglected, first and foremost as it is placed at the beginning of the mark.
Ni ga mogoče zanemariti, predvsem zato, ker je postavljen na začetek znamke.
Also, it is meaningless and distinctive on its own, in all the languages of the European Union' (para. 19).
Poleg tega nima pomena in je sam po sebi razlikovalen v vseh jezikih Evropske unije“ (točka 19).
‘[T]he omission of the letter “SP” in the word “LA SPOSA” or “LA SPOSA COLLECTION” is not an acceptable variation of the earlier mark but a significant modification to the distinctive character of the mark.
„Opustitev črk SP v izrazu LA SPOSA ali LA SPOSA COLLECTION ni sprejemljiva različica prejšnje znamke, temveč bistvena sprememba razlikovalnega značaja znamke.
The documents submitted by the respondent are insufficient to prove that the mark “SP LA SPOSA” has been put to genuine use' (para. 26).
Dokumenti, ki jih je predložila tožena stranka, ne zadostujejo za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi znamke SP LA SPOSA (točka 26).
In this case the Court examined whether the omission, in the form as used, of the expression ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' alters the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered.
Sodišče je v tej zadevi proučilo, ali je opustitev izraza „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ v obliki, ki se uporablja, spreminja razlikovalni značaj prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana.
Firstly, the words 'Sabores de Navarra' (tastes/flavours of Navarra) refer to sensations or impressions evoking a region of northern Spain.
Najprej, besede „Sabores de Navarra“ (okusi Navarre) se nanašajo na občutke ali vtise, ki v spomin prikličejo pokrajino v severni Španiji.
Thus, the elements can be perceived by the Spanish-speaking public as descriptive of the geographical origin of the goods in question.
Zato lahko špansko govoreča javnost te elemente dojema, kot da opisujejo geografsko poreklo zadevnega blaga.
Moreover, the word ‘sabores' (favours) may be perceived as an indication of product quality, i.e. flavour.
Poleg tega bi se lahko beseda „sabores“ (okusi) dojemala kot označba kakovosti proizvodov, tj. okusa.
It follows that the elements ‘Sabores de Navarra' must be regarded as essentially descriptive.
Iz tega sledi, da je treba v zvezi z elementi „Sabores de Navarra“ šteti, da so v bistvu opisni.
The elements ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor', given the meaning of the word ‘La Sabiduría' (wisdom) and the word ‘sabor' (flavour), constitutes a play of words and cannot be considered descriptive.
Elementi „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ glede na pomen izraza „La Sabiduría“ (modrost) in besede „sabor“ (okus) pomenijo besedno igro in jih ni mogoče šteti za opisne.
It follows that the distinctiveness of the earlier mark comes essentially from the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor'.
Iz tega sledi, da razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke dejansko izhaja iz besed „La Sabiduría del Sabor“.
The Court found that in the present case, the omission of the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' in the form used alters the distinctive character of the mark (paras 31-45).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da izpustitev besed „La Sabiduría del Sabor“ v obliki, ki se uporablja, spreminja razlikovalni značaj znamke (točke od 31 do 45).
‘The earlier trade marks are strongly characterised by the presence of the figurative element.
Za prejšnje blagovne znamke je zelo značilen figurativni element.
However, the documents submitted during the opposition proceedings and, even if they were to be taken into account, the appeal proceedings, do not show any use of the figurative element contained in the earlier trade marks' (para. 19).
Vendar iz dokumentov, ki so bili predloženi v postopku ugovora, tudi če bi jih bilo treba upoštevati v postopku pritožbe, ni razvidna nikakršna uporaba figurativnega elementa iz prejšnjih blagovnih znamk (točka 19).
‘Therefore, the Office considers that the alteration of the opponent's trade mark appearing in the way it is currently used is not an acceptable alteration and consequently use of the registered mark is not shown.
Urad zato meni, da sprememba blagovne znamke vložnika ugovora, ki se pojavlja v obliki, v kateri se uporablja zdaj, ni sprejemljiva sprememba, zato uporaba registrirane znamke ni dokazana.
The Court confirmed that the use of a [standard] typeface does not alter the distinctive character of a word mark.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da uporaba [standardne] pisave ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja besedne znamke.
It rather helps to distinguish the mark from the descriptive elements ‘ron' and ‘de Cuba' (para. 34).
Nasprotno, pripomore k razlikovanju znamke od opisnih elementov „ron“ in „de Cuba“ (točka 34).
The Board confirmed OD's views that use of the word mark ‘MILENARIO' written in stylised bold characters did not affect the distinctive character of the mark, as the word ‘MILENARIO' was considered to be the dominant element of the mark registered for sparkly wines and liquors in Class 33 (para. 13).
Odbor za pritožbe je potrdil stališča oddelka za ugovore, da uporaba besedne znamke „MILENARIO“, napisane v stiliziranih črkah v krepkem tisku, ni vplivala na razlikovalni značaj znamke, saj se upošteva, da je beseda „MILENARIO“ prevladujoči element znamke, registrirane za peneča vina in likerje iz razreda 33 (točka 13).
Representation of the word mark, registered for pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations; plasters; materials for dressings; fungicides; disinfectants covered by the earlier trade mark in Class 5, in a stylised form together with figurative elements was not considered as substantially changing the distinctive character of the word trade mark ‘AMYCOR' as registered.
Štelo se je, da prikaz besedne znamke, registrirane za farmacevtske in sanitarne proizvode; obliže, obvezilni material; materiale za obveze; fungicide; razkužila, ki jih označuje prejšnja znamka iz razreda 5, pri čemer je znamka prikazana v stilizirani obliki skupaj s figurativnimi elementi, ne spreminja bistveno razlikovalnega značaja besedne znamke „AMYCOR“, kot je bila registrirana.
‘The applicant's argument that the proof of use is insufficient because it refers to the device mark … and not to the word mark ‘THE ECONOMIST' fails.
Trditev vložnika ugovora, da je dokaz o uporabi nezadosten, ker se nanaša na figurativno znamko […], in ne na besedno znamko THE ECONOMIST, ne vzdrži.
First, the submitted evidence refers to both earlier marks (i.e. the word mark and the device mark).
Prvič, predloženi dokazi se nanašajo na obe prejšnji znamki (tj. besedno in figurativno znamko).
Furthermore, use of the earlier device mark constitutes use of the earlier word mark.
Poleg tega uporaba prejšnje figurativne znamke pomeni uporabo prejšnje besedne znamke.
- Reference in newspaper articles to the word BIOTEX in plain typeface.
Registrirana oblika Dejanska uporaba Št. zadeve
- The word BIOTEX in white block capitals with the top-most point of the letter ‘I' in darker colouring.
BIOTEX (različna) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX
- The word BIOTEX in white upper and lower cases block letters on a darker background incorporating a figurative ‘wave' device' (para. 14).
Črke, ki sestavljajo znamko, so bile na splošno preproste velike tiskane črke brez nenavadnih elementov.
‘The evidence of use shows the mark has remained, in spite of various stylistic changes, essentially BIOTEX.
Velike črke so včasih preproste in dvodimenzionalne, včasih pa senčene, da dajejo vtis tridimenzionalnosti.
The letters forming the mark have in general been mere block capitals, lacking anything fanciful.
Zgornji del črke l je včasih drugačne barve.
The Board does not consider that these variations invalidate use of the mark BIOTEX and therefore the contested decision must be annulled at this point' (para. 17).
Poleg tega meni, da te spremembe ne izpodbijajo uporabe znamke BIOTEX, zato je treba izpodbijano odločbo na tej točki razveljaviti (točka 17).
‘The actual use of the trade mark which can be seen on the beer pack, the newspaper extract and on the calendar is not the use of the registered word mark SILVER, but of the colour device mark, namely a beer label with the word SILVER written in white capital letters in a red banner which overlaps a golden circle which contains the word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg”.
Dejanska uporaba znamke, ki jo je mogoče videti na embalaži piva, v odlomku iz časopisa in na koledarju, ni uporaba registrirane besedne znamke SILVER, temveč barvne figurativne znamke, in sicer etikete piva, na kateri je beseda SILVER napisana v belih velikih črkah na rdečem traku, ki prekriva zlat krog, v katerem so besedni elementi Bière sans alcool, Bière de haute qualité, pur malt in Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg.
This does not automatically mean that the mark was not used as registered.
To samo po sebi ne pomeni, da znamka ni bila uporabljena, kot je bila registrirana.
Each case must be looked at on its own merits.
Vsaka zadeva se analizira samostojno.
In this case, the Office finds that the mark SILVER is the actual trade mark.
Urad v tem primeru meni, da je beseda SILVER dejanska blagovna znamka.
The appearance of the other word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg” and the figurative element is only secondary to the mark SILVER.
Drugi prikazani besedni elementi Bière sans alcool, Bière de haute qualité, pur malt in Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg ter figurativni element so v primerjavi z znamko SILVER drugotnega pomena.
It is also clear from the marketing study, the newspaper extract and the invoices that the actual trade mark is SILVER.
Poleg tega je iz tržne študije, odlomka iz časopisa in računov razvidno, da je SILVER dejanska blagovna znamka.
The Office finds that the use of the word SILVER is so dominant in the figurative mark that it fulfils the requirements of having been used as registered.'
Po mnenju Urada je uporaba besede SILVER tako prevladujoča v figurativni znamki, da izpolnjuje zahteve glede uporabe v obliki, kot je bila registrirana.
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; dismissed 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; Pritožba zavrnjena 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171
In any case, since the stylisation of the letter “q” suggests, as has just been said, the face of a watch, it is not particularly distinctive for goods in Class 14, the only goods for which the applicant has furnished proof of use of the earlier mark.
Sicer pa je treba natančneje določiti, da stilizacija črke q, ki namiguje, kot je bilo že povedano, na urino številčnico, ne pomeni posebej razlikovalnega značaja proizvodov iz razreda 14, ki so edini, za katere je tožeča stranka predložila dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke.
The word ‘vigar' is an invented word and is, therefore, inherently distinctive.
Beseda „vigar“ je izmišljena beseda in je zato inherentno razlikovalna.
Given the fact that the word ‘vigar' is the only word element, and given its inherent distinctiveness, its central position and the fact that the additional elements highlight its presence, the word is the most distinctive element of the earlier mark.
Ker je beseda „vigar“ edini besedni element in zaradi njenega inherentnega razlikovalnega učinka, osrednjega položaja in dejstva, da dodatni elementi poudarjajo njeno prisotnost, je ta beseda najbolj razlikovalen element prejšnje znamke.
The form as used differs from the earlier mark as registered only in the ascending orientation of its oval background, the use of lower case instead of upper case letters and the replacement of the crown element by a sequence of three dots.
Oblika, ki se uporablja, se razlikuje od prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana, le v ascendentni orientaciji njenega ovalnega ozadja, uporabi malih namesto velikih črk in nadomestitvi elementa krone z zaporedjem treh pik.
The Court agreed that a different orientation of the same background, the use of upper case or lower case letters when they are standard letters that reproduce the same term, or the substitution of an ornamental element (the sequence of dots) for a laudatory element when both of those elements serve to reinforce the term ‘vigar', are minor differences that do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark as registered.
Sodišče se je strinjalo, da so drugačna orientacija istega ozadja, uporaba velikih ali malih črk, kadar so običajne črke, ki prikazujejo enak izraz, ali nadomestitev poveličevalnega elementa z okrasnim (zaporedje pik), kadar sta oba elementa namenjena krepitvi izraza „vigar“, majhne razlike, ki ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje blagovne znamke, kot je bila registrirana.
That finding is not called into question if the second form of use is taken into account, inasmuch as, even though, in that case, the basic background disappears and the word ‘spain' is present, the latter will be understood as a merely descriptive addition (paras 70-74).
O tej ugotovitvi ni mogoče podvomiti, če se upošteva druga oblika uporabe, glede na to, da čeprav v tem primeru izgine osnovno ozadje in je prisotna beseda „spain“, se bo ta štela le za opisni dodatek (točke od 70 do 74).
The distinctive character of the mark is essentially derived, not from its figurative elements, but from the word ‘vieta'.
Razlikovalni značaj znamke dejansko ne izhaja iz njenih figurativnih elementov, temveč iz besede „vieta“.
The element has a high level of distinctive character and occupies an important position in the overall impression created by the mark as registered, whilst the figurative elements have only weak distinctive character and occupy merely an ancillary position in the overall impression.
Ta element ima močan razlikovalni značaj in ima pomemben položaj v celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja znamka, kot je bila registrirana, figurativni elementi v celotnem vtisu pa imajo le šibek razlikovalni značaj in le akcesorni položaj.
Those figurative elements, including the typeface used, have a relatively marginal visual impact.
Ti figurativni elementi, vključno z uporabljeno pisavo, imajo razmeroma zanemarljiv vizualni učinek.
The rectangular border does not present any originality in relation to usual commercial use.
Štirikotna obroba ni nikakor izvirna z vidika običajne komercialne rabe.
As regards the figurative elements made up of, on the one hand, grey rectangles separating the letters of the word ‘vieta' and, on the other hand, white rectangles appearing in the middle of the sides of the rectangular border, they are very small in size, are not striking and do not present any originality (paras 47 and 48).
Kar zadeva figurativne elemente, ki so na eni strani sestavljeni iz sivih štirikotnikov, ki ločijo črke besede „vieta“, na drugi strani pa dveh belih štirikotnikov, ki sta na sredi ploskev pravokotne obrobe, so ti zelo majhni in niso izstopajoči, poleg tega niso nikakor izvirni (točki 47 in 48).
‘In relation to the “FETA” product, as regards the two Greek flags next to the word “TAVERNA” it should be noted that the obligation of using a trade mark as registered does not require its proprietor to use the mark in isolation in the course of trade.
V zvezi s proizvodom FETA je treba glede dveh grških zastav poleg besede TAVERNA opozoriti, da obveznost glede uporabe blagovne znamke, kot je bila registrirana, ne pomeni, da mora imetnik blagovno znamko v gospodarskem prometu uporabljati ločeno.
Article 15(1) CTMR [now Article 18(1) EUTMR] does not preclude the possibility of the trade mark's proprietor adding further (decorative or descriptive) elements, or even other marks such as its house mark on the packaging of the product, as long as the trade mark ‘as registered' remains clearly recognisable and in an individual form.
Člen 15(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki Skupnosti [zdaj člen 18(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU] ne izključuje možnosti, da imetnik na embalažo proizvoda doda dodatne (okrasne ali opisne) elemente ali celo druge znamke, kot je njegova hišna znamka, če blagovna znamka, kot je bila registrirana, ostane jasno prepoznavna in ohrani individualno obliko.
The two Greek flags do not possess any distinctive character in relation to the products at hand which are commonly known to be food specialities originating from Greece.
Grški zastavi nimata razlikovalnega značaja v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi, ki so na splošno znani kot kulinarične specialitete iz Grčije.
This is supported by the whole get-up of the product, coloured in blue and white in accordance with the colours of the Greek flag, the depiction of scenery which calls to mind a Mediterranean scene and the symbol for a Protected Designation of Origin below the picture' (para. 39).
To ugotovitev podpirajo celoten videz proizvoda, saj je njegova embalaža modre in bele barve kot grška zastava, slika pokrajine, ki spominja na prizor iz Sredozemlja, in znak za zaščiteno označbo porekla pod sliko (točka 39).