natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For example, German renewals and sometimes Spanish renewals do not contain all the necessary data and therefore are, on their own, not sufficient to substantiate an earlier mark.
Na primer, nemška in včasih tudi španska podaljšanja ne vsebujejo vseh potrebnih podatkov in zato ne zadostujejo za utemeljitev prejšnje znamke.
If there is no proper evidence of renewal, the earlier registration is not substantiated and will not be taken into account.
Če se ustrezen dokaz o podaljšanju ne predloži, prejšnja registracija ne bo utemeljena in se ne bo upoštevala.
4.2.3.5 Entitlement to file the opposition
Upravičenost do vložitve ugovora
Article 2(2)(h)(iii) and Article 7(2) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(h)(iii) in člen 7(2) Delegirane uredbe
Depending on the ground invoked the following are entitled to file an opposition:
Glede na navedeni razlog imajo pravico do vložitve ugovora:
1. proprietors and authorised licensees for Article 8(1) and (5) EUTMR;
imetniki in pooblaščeni pridobitelji licence iz člena 8(1) in (5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU;
2. proprietors (only) for trade marks referred to in Article 8(3) EUTMR;
(samo) imetniki za blagovne znamke iz člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU;
3. proprietors of earlier rights referred to in Article 8(4) EUTMR and persons authorised under the relevant applicable national law;
imetniki prejšnjih pravic iz člena 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in osebe, pooblaščene na podlagi zadevnega nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja;
4. any person authorised under the relevant European Union legislation or national law to exercise the rights referred to in Article 8(6) EUTMR.
katera koli oseba, ki je na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic iz člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
If the opponent is a corporation, the name of the corporation must be carefully compared with the name of the corporation that owns the prior trade mark.
Če je vložnik ugovora pravna oseba, je treba ime pravne osebe skrbno primerjati z imenom pravne osebe, ki je imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke.
For instance with British companies, John Smith Ltd, John Smith PLC and John Smith (UK) Ltd are different legal entities.
Na primer, pri britanskih podjetjih so John Smith Ltd, John Smith PLC in John Smith (UK) Ltd različne pravne osebe.
If the opposition is filed with B as opponent and a copy of the registration certificate shows A as owner of the earlier mark, the opposition will be rejected as not substantiated, unless the opponent has submitted evidence of the transfer and, if already available, the registration of the transfer in the relevant register or the opponent has shown that A and B are the same legal entity, which has merely changed its name.
Če ugovor vloži oseba B kot vložnik ugovora in je na kopiji potrdila o registraciji kot imetnik prejšnje znamke navedena oseba A, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen, razen če je vložnik ugovora predložil dokaze o prenosu in, če je že na voljo, dokaz o vpisu prenosa v ustrezen register ali dokazal, da sta osebi A in B ista pravna oseba, ki je le spremenila ime.
If the opponent is a licensee of the trade mark proprietor, the extract of the registration will normally show when a licence has been registered.
Če je vložnik ugovora pridobitelj licence imetnika blagovne znamke, bo na izpisku iz vpisa v register običajno navedeno, kdaj je bila licenca registrirana.
However, some Member States do not record licences in their registers.
Nekatere države članice licenc ne vpisujejo v svoje registre.
In all cases, it is up to the opponent to demonstrate that it is a licensee and also that it is authorised by the trade mark owner to file an opposition.
V vseh primerih je vložnik ugovora tisti, ki mora dokazati, da je pridobitelj licence in da ga je za vložitev ugovora pooblastil imetnik blagovne znamke.
There are no restrictions on what evidence can be submitted to support such an authorisation: for example, any express authorisation on behalf of the trade mark proprietor, such as the licence contract, is deemed sufficient, so long as it contains indications concerning the authorisation or entitlement to file the opposition.
Omejitev glede dokazov, ki jih je mogoče predložiti za dokaz obstoja takšnega pooblastila, ni: na primer, katero koli izrecno pooblastilo v imenu imetnika blagovne znamke, kot je licenčna pogodba, se šteje za zadostno, če vsebuje navedbe v zvezi s pooblastilom ali upravičenostjo do vložitve ugovora.
The same applies to any person authorised under the relevant applicable European Union legislation or national law for the grounds of Article 8(4) and (6) EUTMR.
Enako velja za vse osebe, pooblaščene na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava, ki se uporabljata, v zvezi s členom 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The opponent must prove its entitlement to file the opposition under the applicable European Union legislation or national law.
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati svojo upravičenost do vložitve ugovora na podlagi zakonodaje Evropske unije ali nacionalnega prava, ki se uporabljata.
According to Articles 25, 26 and 29 EUTMR, the Office registers and publishes licence agreements in respect of European Union trade marks.
Urad v skladu s členi 25, 26 in 29 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v register vpiše licenčne pogodbe v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami EU in jih objavi.
If the earlier mark basis of an opposition subject to a licence agreement is an EUTM, the opponent does not have to submit any evidence of the licence agreement as long as the licence has been registered and published at the Office in accordance with Article 25 EUTMR.
Če ugovor temelji na prejšnji znamki, ki je predmet licenčne pogodbe in je blagovna znamka EU, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti nobenega dokaza o licenčni pogodbi, če je bila licenca vpisana v register in objavljena pri Uradu v skladu s členom 25 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
On the other hand, the opponent will still have to submit evidence that proves that this licence agreement entitles it to act in defence of the mark even where the licence is registered and published at the Office, if this evidence was not attached to the original request submitted in accordance with Article 25(5) EUTMR.
Po drugi strani bo moral vložnik ugovora še vedno predložiti dokaze, če ti niso bili priloženi prvotni zahtevi, predloženi v skladu s členom 25(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, da ima na podlagi te licenčne pogodbe pravico ukrepati v obrambo znamke tudi, če je licenca vpisana v register in objavljena pri Uradu.
For more information on licences, see the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 3, EUTMs and RCDS as Objects of Property, Chapter 2, Licences, Rights in Rem, Levies of Execution, Insolvency Proceedings or Similar Proceedings.
Za več informacij o licencah glej Smernice, del E: Registri, razdelek 3: Blagovne znamke EU in registrirani modeli Skupnosti kot predmeti premoženja, poglavje 2: Licence, stvarne pravice, izvršbe, postopki v primeru insolventnosti ali podobni postopki.
It is not sufficient to prove the registration of the licence agreement - the opponent's entitlement to defend the EUTM must also be submitted in writing.
Dokaz o vpisu licenčne pogodbe v register ne zadostuje, saj je treba predložiti tudi pisno pooblastilo za vložnika ugovora, da brani blagovno znamko EU.
4.2.3.6 Verification of evidence
Preverjanje dokazov
The Office verifies that the claims submitted by the opponent within the 3month opposition period are reflected in the evidence submitted or in the evidence accessible online from a source recognised by the Office if the opponent relied on that.
Urad preveri, ali so zahteve, ki jih je vložnik ugovora vložil v trimesečnem roku za ugovor, razvidne iz predloženih dokazov ali dokazov, ki so na voljo na spletu iz vira, ki ga Urad priznava, če se je vložnik ugovora nanj skliceval.
The following details should be checked:
Preveriti je treba naslednje podrobnosti:
the issuing authority;
organ, ki je izdal potrdilo,
the filing [210] and/or registration numbers [111] (in certain countries these are, or were, different);
številko vložitve (210) in/ali registracije (111) (v nekaterih državah sta ali sta bili drugačni),
a representation of the sign as filed or registered [531, 540, 541, 546, 554, 556, 557, 571, 591] and as claimed in the notice of opposition;
prikaz znaka, kot je prijavljen ali registriran (531, 541, 546, 554, 556, 557, 571, 591) in kot se zahteva v ugovoru.
Where the earlier mark has been identified as being in colour during the 3-month opposition period, there are two acceptable scenarios.
Če se v trimesečnem roku za ugovor opredeli, da je prejšnja znamka barvna, sta sprejemljivi možnosti dve.
An official colour representation of the mark such as a registration certificate, renewal certificate, official extract, etc. is submitted or available online that contains a reproduction of the mark in colour.
Predloži se uradni barvni prikaz znamke, ki vsebuje reprodukcijo znamke v barvah, na primer potrdilo o registraciji, potrdilo o podaljšanju, uradni izpisek itd., pri čemer je ta prikaz lahko na voljo tudi na spletu.
An official document is presented with the representation of the mark in black and white, together with a colour claim and a colour indication, both of which are translated into the language of the proceedings.
Predloži se uradni dokument s črno-belim prikazom znamke, in sicer skupaj z zahtevo za barvo in navedbo barve, pri čemer sta oba prevedena v jezik postopka.
Where the national trade mark office does not provide a detailed colour claim identifying the colours, and instead says ‘Colours claimed' (or similar wording), this is acceptable as long as this entry is translated into the language of the proceedings.
Če nacionalni urad za blagovne znamke ne zagotovi podrobne zahteve za barve, v kateri so opredeljene barve, ampak namesto tega navede, da so barve zahtevane (ali podobno besedilo), je to sprejemljivo, če je ta vnos preveden v jezik postopka.
Where the national office (e.g. the Portuguese Trade Mark Office) does not provide any indication of a colour claim in its certificate or official extract and the opponent does not rely on online evidence, further official documents must be submitted to prove this claim (e.g. a copy of the publication of the mark in the bulletin).
Če nacionalni urad (npr. portugalski urad za blagovne znamke) v svojem potrdilu ali uradnem izpisku ne navede nobene zahteve glede barve in se vložnik ugovora ne sklicuje na spletne dokaze, je treba za dokaz te zahteve predložiti dodatne uradne dokumente (npr. kopijo objave znamke v biltenu).
However, the latter scenario is only acceptable if the opponent has also submitted a colour representation of the mark from an unofficial origin (separate sheet of paper, within the observations, attached to the notice of opposition, etc.).
Vendar je ta druga možnost sprejemljiva le, če je vložnik ugovora predložil tudi barvni prikaz znamke iz neuradnega vira (ločen list papirja, v pripombah, prilogi k ugovoru itd.).
Therefore, if the opponent has identified during the 3-month opposition period that its figurative mark is in colour and has only submitted a black and white representation to the Office with no further evidence of a colour claim, the opposition based on that earlier right will be rejected as not substantiated.
Če je vložnik ugovora v trimesečnem roku za ugovor opredelil, da je njegova figurativna znamka barvna, vendar je Uradu poslal samo črno-beli prikaz brez nadaljnjih dokazov o zahtevani barvi, bo zato ugovor, ki temelji na navedeni prejšnji pravici, zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
Likewise, if the opponent has provided no indication during the opposition period that the earlier mark is in colour (representation in colour, or colour claim), and has only submitted a colour representation to the Office in order to substantiate its opposition, the opposition based on that earlier right will be rejected as not substantiated.
Podobno, če vložnik ugovora v roku za ugovor ni navedel, da je prejšnja znamka barvna (barvni prikaz ali zahteva glede barve), in je Uradu za utemeljitev svojega ugovora predložil le barvni prikaz, bo ugovor, ki temelji na tej prejšnji pravici, zavrnjen kot neutemeljen;
the goods and services covered [511];
zajeto blago in storitve (511),
the expiry date of the registration (if given);
datum poteka registracije (če je naveden),
the owner [731, 732];
imetnika (731, 732),
other entries in the register affecting the legal or procedural status or the scope of protection of the mark (e.g. disclaimers [526], restrictions, renewals, transfers, pending actions, the fact that the mark was registered due to acquired distinctiveness through use, etc.).
druge vnose v register, ki vplivajo na pravni ali procesni status ali obseg varstva znamke (npr. odklonitve (526), omejitve, podaljšanja, prenosi, ukrepi v teku, dejstvo, da je bila znamka registrirana zaradi razlikovalnega učinka, pridobljenega z uporabo, itd.).
The number in square brackets is the international code number used to identify the information in many, but not all, pieces of evidence, such as extracts from official databases or registration certificates.
Številka v oglatih oklepajih je številka mednarodne kode, ki se uporablja za označevanje informacij na številnih, vendar ne vseh dokazov, kot so izpiski iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk ali potrdila o registraciji.
The opponent is not obliged to submit an explanation of the codes, either for the INID or for the national codes.
Vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti pojasnila niti za kode INID niti za nacionalne kode.
4.2.4 Substantiation of well-known marks, claims of reputation, trade marks filed by an agent, earlier signs used in the course of trade, designations of origin or geographical indications
Utemeljitev znanih znamk, znamk z ugledom, blagovnih znamk, ki jih vloži posrednik, prejšnjih znakov, ki se uporabljajo v gospodarskem prometu, označb porekla ali geografskih označb
4.2.4.1 Well-known marks
Znane znamke
Article 7(2)(b) EUTMDR
Člen 7(2)(b) Delegirane uredbe
An earlier well-known mark is a trade mark that is well known in a Member State, in the sense in which the words ‘well known' are used in Article 6bis of the Paris Convention.
Prejšnja znana znamka je blagovna znamka, ki je v državi članici znana v smislu izraza znan iz člena 6bis Pariške konvencije.
Such a mark may be non-registered, but it may also be registered.
Takšna znamka je lahko neregistrirana ali registrirana.
The opponent needs to demonstrate that it is the owner of an earlier trade mark that has become well known, in the relevant territory, for the goods and services on which the opposition is based.
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati, da je imetnik prejšnje blagovne znamke, ki je na zadevnem ozemlju postala znana za blago in storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor.
In order to substantiate its mark it will have to submit evidence of the mark being well known.
Za utemeljitev svoje znamke bo moral predložiti dokaze o tem, da je znamka znana.
If the opponent invokes a registered trade mark and claims the same mark in the same country as a well-known mark, this will in general be taken as an additional claim that its registered mark has acquired a high degree of distinctiveness by use.
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na registrirano blagovno znamko, ki jo v isti državi uveljavlja kot znano znamko, se bo to običajno razlagalo kot dodatna trditev, da je njegova registrirana znamka z uporabo pridobila visoko stopnjo razlikovalnega učinka.
It is very common for opponents to confuse ‘well-known' marks with ‘marks with a reputation' under Article 8(5) EUTMR.
Vložniki ugovorov zelo pogosto zamenjujejo znane znamke z znamkami z ugledom v smislu člena 8(5) uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Depending on the ground of opposition that is indicated, the case will have to be considered under Article 8(2)(c) and/or Article 8(5) EUTMR.
Glede na navedeni razlog za ugovor bo treba zadevo obravnavati na podlagi člena 8(2)(c) in/ali člena 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
See also the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR).
Glej tudi Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
4.2.4.2 Marks with reputation
Znamke z ugledom
Article 7(2)(f) EUTMDR
Člen 7(2)(f) Delegirane uredbe
An opposition under Article 8(5) EUTMR is based on an earlier trade mark that has a reputation.
Ugovor na podlagi člena 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU temelji na prejšnji blagovni znamki, ki uživa ugled.
See also the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR).
Glej tudi Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The earlier trade mark in these cases is a registered trade mark.
V teh primerih je prejšnja blagovna znamka registrirana blagovna znamka.
The opponent therefore has to submit registration certificates, etc. or rely on online evidence as set out above.
Vložnik ugovora mora zato predložiti potrdila o registraciji itd., ali se sklicevati na spletne dokaze, kot je navedeno zgoraj.
In order to make its case under Article 8(5) EUTMR, the opponent has to submit evidence of reputation.
Da bi se vložnik ugovora lahko skliceval na člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, mora predložiti dokaze o ugledu.
In addition, the opponent has either to allege and demonstrate that use of the mark that is the subject matter of the contested EUTM application would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark, or to indicate that this is probable in the ordinary course of events.
Poleg tega mora bodisi trditi in dokazati, da bi uporaba znamke, ki je predmet izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU, neupravičeno izkoristila ali oškodovala razlikovalni značaj ali ugled prejšnje blagovne znamke, bodisi navesti, da bi se to verjetno zgodilo pri običajnem poteku dogodkov.
4.2.4.3 Non-registered trade mark or another sign used in the course of trade
Neregistrirana blagovna znamka ali drug znak, ki se uporablja v gospodarskem prometu
Article 7(3) EUTMDR
Člen 7(3) Delegirane uredbe
For these rights, the Office applies the protection provided by the relevant law.
Urad za te pravice uporablja varstvo, določeno z zadevnim pravom.
Thus, when the relevant law requires these rights to be registered for protection, copies of the registration and, if applicable, documents such as renewal certificates are required.
Če se v skladu z zadevnim pravom zahteva, da so te pravice registrirane za varstvo, je treba predložiti kopije registracije in, če je ustrezno, dokumente, kot so potrdila o podaljšanju.
In the case of non-registered marks or signs, the opponent must submit evidence of acquisition of the earlier right.
Vložnik ugovora mora v primeru neregistriranih znamk ali znakov predložiti dokaze o pridobitvi prejšnje pravice.
It must further show that it may prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark.
Dokazati mora tudi, da lahko prepove uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke.
Furthermore, it also needs to provide a reference to and the wording of the provisions of the national law on which it bases its case by adducing official publications of the relevant provisions or jurisprudence, and to make out its case under that law.
Poleg tega mora predložiti sklicevanje na določbe nacionalnega prava, na katerih je utemeljil svoj ugovor, in besedilo teh določb, in sicer z navedbo uradnih publikacij zadevnih določb ali sodne prakse, ter utemeljiti svoje argumente na navedenem pravu.
Where the evidence concerning the filing or registration of the sign claimed or the evidence concerning the content of the relevant national law is accessible online from a source recognised by the Office, the opponent may provide such evidence by making a reference to that source.
Če so dokazi o vložitvi prijave ali registraciji zahtevanega znaka ali dokazi o vsebini zadevnega nacionalnega prava dostopni prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, lahko vložnik ugovora predloži takšne dokaze s sklicevanjem na navedeni vir.
For that purpose, all online official publications and national databases will be accepted to the extent that they originate from the government or official body of the Member State concerned, provided they are publicly accessible and free of charge.
V ta namen bodo sprejete vse spletne uradne publikacije in nacionalne podatkovne zbirke, kolikor izvirajo od vladnega ali uradnega organa zadevne države članice, in sicer če so javno dostopne in brezplačne.
For cases where the provisions of national law are governed by common law rules, the acceptable source may include online official publications (jurisprudence).
Kadar so določbe nacionalnega prava urejene s pravili občega prava, lahko sprejemljivi viri primerov vključujejo spletne uradne publikacije (sodno prakso).
Finally, the opponent must submit evidence that the use of its right, either registered or not, has been of more than mere local significance.
Nazadnje, vložnik ugovora mora predložiti dokaze, da je uporaba njegove pravice, registrirane ali ne, več kot le lokalnega pomena.
See the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 4, Rights under Articles 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR.
Glej tudi Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 4: Pravice na podlagi člena 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
4.2.4.4 Protected designations of origin, protected geographical indications
Zaščitene označbe porekla, zaščitene geografske označbe
Article 8(6) EUTMR
Člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 7(2)(e) EUTMDR
Člen 7(2)(e) Delegirane uredbe
Under Article 8(6) EUTMR, protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications applied for prior to the date of application of the EUTM (or the date of priority claimed, if applicable) can be invoked as the basis for oppositions.
V skladu s členom 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je mogoče zaščitene označbe porekla in zaščitene geografske označbe, za katere je bila prijava vložena pred datumom prijave blagovne znamke EU (ali datumom zahtevane prednostne pravice, če je ustrezno), uporabiti kot podlago za ugovor.
For these rights, the Office applies the protection provided by the relevant European Union legislation or national law.
Urad za te pravice uporablja varstvo, zagotovljeno z zadevno zakonodajo Evropske unije ali nacionalnim pravom.
In order to substantiate these rights, the opponent must provide the Office with evidence of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier right.
Vložnik ugovora mora za utemeljitev teh pravic Uradu predložiti dokaze o obstoju, veljavnosti in obsegu varstva prejšnje pravice.
To prove the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier right, the opponent must submit pertinent documents emanating from the competent authority proving that the right in question has been applied for, registered or granted (if the protected designation of origin or protected geographical indication was granted through administrative means other than registration).
Da vložnik ugovora dokaže obstoj, veljavnost in obseg varstva prejšnje pravice, mora predložiti zadevne dokumente, ki jih je izdal pristojni organ in ki dokazujejo, da je bila zadevna pravica prijavljena, registrirana ali podeljena (če je bila zaščitena označba porekla ali zaščitena geografska označba podeljena na podlagi upravnih postopkov, ki niso registracija).
If these documents do not provide sufficient information regarding the opponent's entitlement to file the opposition, further documents must be submitted.
Če ti dokumenti ne zagotavljajo dovolj informacij v zvezi z upravičenostjo vložnika ugovora do vložitve ugovora, je treba predložiti dodatne dokumente.
Furthermore, to prove that it is entitled to prohibit use of a subsequent trade mark under the relevant law, the opponent must provide a reference to and the wording of any national law on which it bases its case.
Da vložnik ugovora poleg tega dokaže, da lahko v skladu z zadevnim pravom prepove uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke, mora predložiti sklicevanje na nacionalno pravo, na katerem je utemeljil svoj ugovor, in besedilo tega prava.
The wording is not required if the opposition is based on European Union legislation.
Besedila ni treba predložiti, če ugovor temelji na zakonodaji Evropske unije.