natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such translations must be submitted by the opponent on its own motion and within the time limit for substantiation of the opposition.
Vložnik ugovora mora takšne prevode na lastno pobudo predložiti v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
Only what is submitted and translated within this time limit is taken into account.
Upoštevajo se samo dokumenti in dokazi, ki so predloženi in prevedeni v tem roku.
The requirement for the evidence of substantiation to be translated also relates to online evidence referred to by the opponent, where the language of the online evidence is not the same as the language of the proceedings.
Zahteva glede prevoda dokazov o utemeljitvi se nanaša tudi na spletne dokaze, na katere se sklicuje vložnik ugovora, če jezik spletnih dokazov ni jezik postopka.
This follows from Article 7(4) EUTMDR, which states that ‘“evidence accessible online” … shall [also either] be in the language of the proceedings or shall be accompanied by a translation into that language'.
To izhaja iz člena 7(4) Delegirane uredbe, ki določa, da so „dokazil[a], dostopn[a] na spletu, [...] v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom v ta jezik“.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR requires the translation to reproduce the structure and contents of the original document.
V skladu s členom 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe mora prevod po zgradbi in vsebini ustrezati izvirnemu dokumentu.
For translations of online evidence of substantiation, submission of the translation without the original will be accepted, as long as the document to which it refers is identified correctly.
Kar zadeva prevode spletnih dokazov o utemeljitvi, bo sprejeta predložitev prevoda brez izvirnega dokumenta, če je dokument, na katerega se prevod nanaša, pravilno opredeljen.
The Office does not consider that information already given in the language of the proceedings in the notice of opposition, or in documents attached thereto or submitted later (e.g. explanation of grounds, lists of earlier marks, etc.), amounts to a valid translation of a registration document, such as a registration certificate, even where such indications have been accepted for admissibility purposes.
Urad informacij, ki so v ugovoru ali dokumentih, priloženih k ugovoru ali predloženih pozneje (npr. obrazložitev razlogov, seznami prejšnjih znamk itd.), že navedene v jeziku postopka, ne šteje za veljaven prevod dokumenta o registraciji, kot je potrdilo o registraciji, tudi če so bile takšne navedbe sprejete za namene preizkusa dopustnosti.
The translation has to be on a stand-alone basis and cannot be assembled from fragments taken from other documents.
Prevod mora biti samostojen dokument in ne sme biti sestavljen iz odlomkov iz drugih dokumentov.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR provides that the opponent may indicate that only parts of the document are relevant, and therefore the translation may be limited to those parts only.
Člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe določa, da lahko vložnik ugovora navede, da so pomembni samo deli dokumenta, zato je lahko prevod omejen le na te dele.
However, only irrelevant administrative indications (e.g. previous transfers of ownership that do not affect the opposition, administrative entries on fees, etc.) with no bearing on the case may be omitted from the translation.
Vendar se iz prevoda lahko izpustijo le nepomembne upravne navedbe (npr. prejšnji prenosi lastništva, ki ne vplivajo na ugovor, upravni vnosi o pristojbinah itd.), ki ne vplivajo na zadevo.
The provisions of Article 25(1) EUTMIR do not imply that the opponent has discretion to decide not to translate the elements required by the Regulation, specifically those listed in Article 7(2) EUTMDR as required for substantiating the earlier rights.
Določbe člena 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe ne pomenijo, da ima vložnik ugovora diskrecijsko pravico za odločitev, da ne bo prevedel elementov, ki se zahtevajo z uredbo, in sicer tistih, navedenih v členu 7(2) Delegirane uredbe, kot se zahtevajo za utemeljitev prejšnjih pravic.
Where the Regulation establishes that an element must be proven, as is the case for existence, validity, scope of protection of earlier rights and entitlement to file the opposition, and these particular parts of the evidence are not translated, the opposition may be rejected as non-substantiated.
Če Uredba določa, da mora biti neki element dokazan, kot velja za obstoj, veljavnost, obseg varstva prejšnjih pravic in upravičenost do vložitve ugovora, in ti konkretni deli dokazov niso prevedeni, se ugovor lahko zavrne kot neutemeljen.
The list of INID codes and their explanations are attached as Appendix 1 to Standard ST 60 (‘Recommendation concerning bibliographic data relating to marks'), available on WIPO's website.
60 - Recommendation Concerning Bibliographic Data Relating to Marks (Priporočilo o bibliografskih podatkih v zvezi z znamkami), ki je na voljo na spletišču organizacije WIPO.
Where the opposition is based on only some of the goods and services covered by the earlier right, it is sufficient to submit only a translation of the goods and services on which the opposition is based.
Če ugovor temelji samo na nekaterem blagu in storitvah, zajetih s prejšnjo pravico, zadostuje samo predložitev prevoda blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor.
When the entire original document is in the language of the proceedings except for the list of goods and services, there will be no need to submit a complete translation following the structure of the original document.
Kadar je celotni izvirni dokument, razen seznama blaga in storitev, v jeziku postopka, ni treba predložiti popolnega prevoda ob upoštevanju zgradbe izvirnega dokumenta.
In this case, it is acceptable if only the goods and services on which the opposition is based have been translated separately in the notice of opposition or in documents attached thereto or submitted later within the time limit to substantiate the opposition.
V takšnem primeru je sprejemljivo, če so bili v ugovoru ali dokumentih, priloženih k ugovoru ali predloženih pozneje, ločeno prevedeni samo blago in storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor, in to v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
The same applies to extracts/certificates that make use of INID or national codes, where the only information that still needs to be translated into the language of the proceedings is the list of goods and services.
Enako velja za izpiske/potrdila, v katerih se uporabljajo kode INID ali nacionalne kode in pri katerih je edina informacija, ki jo je še vedno treba prevesti v jezik postopka, seznam blaga in storitev.
The Office accepts simple translations, drawn up by anybody.
Urad priznava navadne prevode, ki jih pripravi kdor koli.
The Office normally does not make use of its faculty to require the translation to be certified by a sworn or official translator unless serious doubts arise regarding the accuracy or content of the translation.
Urad običajno ne izkoristi možnosti, na podlagi katere lahko zahteva, da prevod overi zapriseženi ali uradni prevajalec, razen če se pojavijo resni dvomi glede točnosti ali vsebine prevoda.
Where the representative adds a declaration that the translation is true to the original, the Office will, in principle, not question this.
Če zastopnik priloži izjavo, da je prevod v skladu z izvirnikom, Urad načeloma o tem ne bo podvomil.
The Office even accepts handwritten text on the copies of the original certificates giving the meaning of the various entries in the language of the proceedings, provided of course that they are complete and legible.
Urad priznava celo ročno napisano besedilo na kopijah originalnih potrdil, s katerim je naveden pomen različnih vnosov v jeziku postopka, če je to besedilo seveda popolno in berljivo.
Extracts from commercial databases cannot be considered valid translations of an official document, unless they reproduce the structure and contents of the original document.
Izpiskov iz komercialnih podatkovnih zbirk ni mogoče šteti za veljavne prevode uradnega dokumenta, razen če se ujemajo z zgradbo in vsebino izvirnega dokumenta.
Where, when assessing the substantiation, it is detected that the translation does not accurately reflect the structure and content of the online database relied upon by the opponent, the Office will, pursuant to Article 97(1)(b) EUTMR, ask the opponent for clarification.
Če se pri presoji utemeljitve ugotovi, da prevod ne ustreza natančno zgradbi in vsebini spletne podatkovne zbirke, na katero se opira vložnik ugovora, bo Urad v skladu s členom 97(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU vložnika ugovora pozval, naj predloži pojasnitev.
This would require the opponent to submit evidence of the contents of the original extract to which the translation relates.
Vložnik ugovora bi moral predložiti dokaze o vsebini izvirnega izpiska, na katerega se prevod nanaša.
In the absence of such evidence, or if the evidence shows a discrepancy between the translation submitted and the original extract as regards the structure and content, the earlier mark will be deemed to be non-substantiated.
Če takšnih dokazov ni oziroma če je iz dokazov razvidna neskladnost med predloženim prevodom in izvirnim izpiskom, kar zadeva zgradbo in vsebino, se bo štelo, da prejšnja znamka ni bila utemeljena.
4.3.1.2 Translations of evidence submitted to substantiate the opposition other than filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, or provisions of the applicable national law
Prevodi dokazov, predloženih za utemeljitev ugovora, ki niso potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti ali določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja
Article 7(4) EUTMDR also addresses the language regime applicable to evidence submitted by the opposing party to substantiate the opposition other than filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, and provisions of applicable national law.
V členu 7(4) Delegirane uredbe se obravnava tudi jezikovna ureditev, ki se uporablja za dokaz, ki jih predloži stranka, ki ugovarja, za utemeljitev ugovora, pri čemer ti dokazi niso potrdila o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti in določbe nacionalnega prava, ki se uporablja.
Such evidence encompasses evidence of reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR) and evidence of use of more than mere local significance (Article 8(4) EUTMR).
Takšni dokazi obsegajo dokaze o ugledu (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU) in dokaze o uporabi, ki je več kot le lokalnega pomena (člen 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
If the evidence is submitted in an EU language that is not the language of the proceedings, the Office may, pursuant to Article 24 EUTMIR, and either of its own motion or upon reasoned request by the applicant, require the opponent to submit a translation of the evidence into the language of the proceedings within a specified time limit.
Če so dokazi predloženi v jeziku EU, ki ni jezik postopka, lahko Urad v skladu s členom 24 Izvedbene uredbe in na lastno pobudo ali na utemeljeno zahtevo prijavitelja od vložnika ugovora zahteva, naj v določenem roku predloži prevod dokazov v jeziku postopka.
In other words, the opponent has no obligation to submit the translation on its own motion, unless it is requested to do so by the Office.
Z drugimi besedami, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti prevoda na svojo pobudo, razen če to od njega zahteva Urad.
Such language regime mirrors the one applicable to proof of use; hence, rules regarding the translation of proof of use equally apply to the abovementioned evidence for substantiation.
Takšna jezikovna ureditev izraža jezikovno ureditev, ki se uporablja za dokaz o uporabi, zato se pravila v zvezi s prevodom dokaza o uporabi uporabljajo tudi za zgoraj navedeni dokazi za utemeljitev.
For further information on applicable rules, see paragraph 4.3.4, Proof of use, below.
Za dodatne informacije o pravilih, ki se uporabljajo, glej odstavek 4.3.4 v nadaljevanju, Dokaz o uporabi.
4.3.1.3 Translations of facts and arguments submitted by the opponent to complete its file
Prevodi dejstev in navedb, ki jih za dopolnitev spisa predloži vložnik ugovora
The Office may consider facts and arguments filed by the opponent in support of the opposition only if they are submitted in the language of the proceedings or are accompanied by a translation within the time limit for substantiation.
Urad lahko upošteva dejstva in navedbe, ki jih v podporo ugovoru predloži vložnik ugovora, le, če so v roku za utemeljitev predloženi v jeziku postopka, ali če jim je priložen prevod.
The Office will not request the opponent to send a translation; it has to send one on its own initiative.
Urad od vložnika ugovora ne bo zahteval, naj pošlje prevod; poslati ga mora na svojo pobudo.
If no translation or only a partial translation has been submitted within the time limit set, parts of written submissions that have not been translated into the language of proceedings will, pursuant to Article 7(5) EUTMDR, not be taken into account.
Če prevod v določenem roku ni predložen ali je predložen le delni prevod, se deli pisnih vlog, ki niso bili prevedeni v jezik postopka, v skladu s členom 7(5) Delegirane uredbe ne bodo upoštevali.
If the submissions are not in the language of the proceedings, they must be translated within the time limit specified for submitting the original document, namely within the time limit for substantiation of the opposition.
Če vloge niso v jeziku postopka, jih je treba prevesti v roku, določenem za predložitev izvirnega dokumenta, in sicer v roku za utemeljitev ugovora.
If this is not done, the legal consequence is that written submissions, or parts thereof, that have not been translated in this time limit are not taken into account.
Pravna posledica opustitve tega dejanja je, da se pisne vloge ali njihovi deli, ki niso bili prevedeni v tem roku, ne upoštevajo.
However, if documents proving the existence and validity of the earlier right have not been translated, the opposition must be refused as unfounded straight away.
Če pa dokumenti, ki dokazujejo obstoj in veljavnost prejšnje pravice, niso bili prevedeni, je treba ugovor takoj zavrniti kot neutemeljen.
4.3.2 Translation of further observations
Prevod dodatnih pripomb
Article 146(9) EUTMR
Člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 8(2), (4) and (6) EUTMDR
Člen 8(2), (4) in (6) Delegirane uredbe
According to Article 146(9) EUTMR, the applicant's first reply or the opponent's reply to the applicant's observations may be in any language of the Office.
V skladu s členom 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je lahko prvi odgovor prijavitelja ali odgovor vložnika ugovora na prijaviteljeve pripombe v katerem koli jeziku Urada.
It is to be noted that if the applicant's first reply or the opponent's counter-reply is not in the language of proceedings but in one of the languages of the Office, the submission will not be taken into account unless the applicant or the opponent submits a translation of these documents in the language of the proceedings within the time limit of 1 month from the date of receipt of the original by the Office.
Treba je upoštevati, da se vloga ne bo upoštevala, če prvi odgovor prijavitelja ali replika vložnika ugovora ni v jeziku postopka, ampak v enem od jezikov Urada, razen če prijavitelj ali vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu od datuma, ko Urad prejme izvirnik, predloži prevod teh dokumentov v jeziku postopka.
The Office will not request the parties to send a translation; the parties have to send one on their own initiative.
Urad od strank ne bo zahteval, naj pošljeta prevod; stranki ga morata poslati na svojo pobudo.
Example 1
1. primer
The language of opposition is English and the applicant has until 26/06/2017 to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition.
Jezik ugovora je angleščina in prijavitelj lahko pripombe v odgovor na ugovor predloži do 26. junija 2017.
If, on 20/06/2017, it submits its observations in reply to the opposition in German, it must file its translation by 20/07/2017.
Če pripombe v odgovor na ugovor predloži 20. junija 2017 v nemščini, mora prevod predložiti do 20. julija 2017.
If it does file the translation on or before 20/07/2017, both the original submission and the translation must be taken into account, notwithstanding that the original time limit for filing observations expired on 26/06/2017.
Če prevod predloži pred 20. julijem 2017 ali na ta datum, je treba upoštevati prvotno predložene pripombe in prevod, ne glede na to, da se je prvotni rok za predložitev pripomb iztekel 26. junija 2017.
Example 2
2. primer
If, on 18/05/2017, it submits its observations in reply to the opposition in German, it must file its translation by 18/06/2017.
Če pripombe v odgovor na ugovor predloži 18. maja 2017 v nemščini, mora prevod predložiti do 18. junija 2017.
However, as its time limit only expires on 26/06/2017, if it has not filed a translation by 18/06/2017, it can still validly file documents until 26/06/2017.
Ker pa se njegov rok izteče šele 26. junija 2017, lahko dokumente, če prevoda ni predložil do 18. junija 2017, še vedno veljavno predloži do 26. junija 2017.
If it then files the translations before the end of the time limit, the Office considers those translations as valid observations filed in the language of the proceedings within the set time limit.
Če nato prevode predloži pred iztekom roka, Urad te prevode šteje za veljavne pripombe, predložene v jeziku postopka v predpisanem roku.
Article 25(2) EUTMIR
Člen 25(2) Izvedbene uredbe
If no translation has been submitted or the translation is received after the expiry of the relevant period, the observations are deemed not to have been received by the Office and they will not be taken into account.
Če prevod ni predložen ali se prevod prejme po preteku zadevnega roka, se šteje, da Urad ni prejel pripomb in se ne bodo upoštevale.
4.3.3 Translation of supporting documents other than observations
Prevod dokazov, ki niso pripombe
Article 24 and Article 25(2) EUTMIR
Člen 24 in člen 25(2) Izvedbene uredbe
All evidence, with the exception of the evidence that the opponent must submit within the time limit given to substantiate its opposition, can be submitted in any official language of the European Union, as Article 24 EUTMIR applies.
Vsi dokazi, razen dokazov, ki jih mora vložnik ugovora predložiti v roku, določenem za utemeljitev ugovora, se lahko predložijo v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije, saj se uporablja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe.
This evidence concerns all documents, other than observations, submitted by the parties after the time limit for the opponent to complete its file.
Ti dokazi se nanašajo na vse dokumente, razen na pripombe, ki jih stranki predložita po roku, v katerem mora vložnik ugovora dopolniti spis.
Examples of this type of evidence are catalogues, magazine articles, decisions of national courts or signed agreements that are submitted by the applicant together with its observations in reply to the opposition.
Primeri tovrstnih dokazov so katalogi, članki v revijah, odločbe nacionalnih sodišč ali podpisane pogodbe, ki jih prijavitelj skupaj s svojimi pripombami predloži v odgovor na ugovor.
For this evidence, a translation is needed only if the Office, on its own motion or upon reasoned request by the other party, requests it.
Pri takšnih dokazih je prevod potreben le, če ga zahteva Urad na lastno pobudo ali na utemeljeno zahtevo druge stranke.
Therefore, the parties are not automatically obliged to file a translation.
Strankama torej ni treba samodejno predložiti prevoda.
In principle, the Office does not ex officio require a translation.
Urad načeloma prevoda ne zahteva po uradni dolžnosti.
However, it is vital that the party to whom the documents are addressed should be able to understand the meaning of their substantive content.
Vendar je izjemno pomembno, da stranka, na katero so dokumenti naslovljeni, razume njihovo vsebino.
If this is doubtful or is contested by the party addressed, the Office requires a translation within a specified time limit.
Urad v primeru dvoma ali nasprotovanja stranke naslovnice zahteva prevod v določenem roku.
Article 25(2) EUTMIR will apply only if the Office requires a translation, with the effect that translations that are filed late must be disregarded; likewise, the original for which a translation is filed late or not at all must also be disregarded.
Člen 25(2) Izvedbene uredbe se bo uporabljal le, če Urad zahteva prevod, kar pomeni, da se prepozno vloženi prevodi ne smejo upoštevati, podobno se ne sme upoštevati niti izvirnik, katerega prevod je vložen prepozno ali sploh ni vložen.
Together with the invitation to file a translation, the Office will draw the attention of the party concerned to the fact that it is up to that party to evaluate whether a complete translation of all the evidence submitted may be necessary.
Urad bo zadevno stranko pozval k predložitvi prevoda in jo hkrati opozoril, da mora proučiti, ali je morda potreben celoten prevod vseh predloženih dokazov.
However, the documents in question will only be taken into account insofar as a translation is submitted or insofar as the documents are self-explanatory, regardless of their verbal components.
Vendar se bodo zadevni dokumenti upoštevali samo, če je predložen prevod ali če so sami po sebi razumljivi ne glede na svoje besedne elemente.
In the case of a national court decision it may be sufficient to translate only those parts that are relevant for the opposition proceedings.
V primeru odločbe nacionalnega sodišča lahko zadostuje prevod le tistih delov, ki so pomembni za postopek ugovora.
Article 10(2) and (6) EUTMDR
Člen 10(2) in (6) Delegirane uredbe
For proof of use, Article 10(6) EUTMDR is lex specialis as regards translations.
Za dokaz o uporabi je člen 10(6) Delegirane uredbe lex specialis, kar zadeva prevode.
If the evidence is submitted in an EU language that is not the language of the proceedings, the Office may require the opponent to submit a translation of the evidence into the language of the proceedings within a specified time limit.
Če so dokazi predloženi v jeziku EU, ki ni jezik postopka, lahko Urad od vložnika ugovora zahteva, naj v določenem roku predloži prevod dokazov v jeziku postopka.
Therefore, the Office may exercise discretion as to whether or not to request a translation.
Urad lahko torej po prosti presoji odloči, ali bo zahteval prevod ali ne.
In exercising this discretion, the Office balances the interests of both parties.
Pri izvajanju te diskrecijske pravice pretehta interese obeh strank.
It is vital that the applicant should be able to understand the meaning of the substantive content of the evidence submitted.
Izjemno pomembno je, da prijavitelj razume vsebino predloženih dokazov.
If this is doubtful or is contested by the applicant, the Office may require a translation within a specified time limit.
Urad lahko v primeru dvoma ali nasprotovanja prijavitelja zahteva prevod v določenem roku.
However, a rejection of such a request is feasible where it appears that the applicant's request, in view of the self-explanatory character of the evidence submitted, is exaggerated or even unjust.
Vendar je mogoče tako zahtevo zavrniti, če se izkaže, da je prijaviteljeva zahteva, glede na to, da so predloženi dokazi sami po sebi razumljivi, pretirani ali celo nepravični.
Article 10(2) EUTMDR has the effect that the opposition must be rejected if (1) no proof of use is submitted within the time limit given, or (2) proof of use was submitted within the time limit given but the Office requested it to be translated and no translation was submitted within the time limit set.
Zaradi učinka člena 10(2) Delegirane uredbe je treba ugovor zavrniti, če (1) v predpisanem roku ni predložen dokaz o uporabi ali če (2) je bil dokaz o uporabi predložen v predpisanem roku, vendar je Urad zahteval njegov prevod, ki pa ni bil predložen v določenem roku.