natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A different apportionment of costs can, however, be justified for reasons of equity (for example, if the application was restricted only to a very small extent).
Vendar je lahko zaradi pravičnosti upravičena drugačna porazdelitev stroškov (npr. če je bila prijava omejena le v zelo majhnem obsegu).
The Office will not take into account parties' arguments as to who should pay.
Urad ne bo upošteval navedb strank glede tega, kdo bi moral plačati stroške.
5.5.4 Cases that did not proceed to judgment
Zadeve, v katerih se razsojanje ni nadaljevalo
5.5.4.1 Multiple oppositions
Več ugovorov
Complete rejection of the EUTM application
Popolna zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU
In cases where there are multiple oppositions against the same EUTM application that have not been suspended by the Office in accordance with Article 9(2) EUTMDR, and one opposition leads to the rejection of the EUTM application, the Office does not take any action in the other oppositions until the appeal period has elapsed.
Kadar je zoper isto prijavo blagovne znamke EU vloženih več ugovorov in jih Urad ni začasno ustavil v skladu s členom 9(2) Delegirane uredbe, pri čemer en ugovor vodi do zavrnitve prijave blagovne znamke EU, Urad ne sprejme nobenih ukrepov v drugih ugovorih, dokler se ne izteče rok za pritožbo.
If the appeal period elapses without an appeal being filed, the Office closes the other opposition proceedings and the cases do not proceed to judgment.
Če se rok za pritožbo izteče, ne da bi bila vložena pritožba, Urad konča druge postopke ugovora in razsojanje se v teh zadevah ne nadaljuje.
In this case, the determination of costs is at the discretion of the Opposition Division (Article 109(5) EUTMR).
V tem primeru je določitev stroškov v diskreciji oddelka za ugovore (člen 109(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The Office is not able to determine who the ‘winning or losing party' is, and the applicant should not be required to pay the costs of several other opponents if it loses in one decision on substance.
Urad ne more določiti, kdo je stranka, ki je uspela, ali stranka, ki ni uspela, pri čemer se od prijavitelja ne sme zahtevati, naj plača stroške več drugih vložnikov ugovorov, če izgubi na podlagi ene meritorne odločbe.
Therefore, applying a principle of equity, each party will be ordered to bear its own costs.
Zato bo na podlagi načela pravičnosti vsaki stranki naloženo plačilo svojih stroškov.
Partial rejection of the EUTM application
Delna zavrnitev prijave blagovne znamke EU
In cases of multiple oppositions that are partially directed against the same goods and services of the contested trade mark, the opposition decision taken first may affect the other oppositions.
V primerih več ugovorov, ki so delno usmerjeni zoper isto blago in storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke, lahko odločba o ugovoru, ki je sprejeta prva, vpliva na druge ugovore.
Opposition A is directed against Class 1 and opposition B against Classes 1 and 2 of the contested EUTM application.
Ugovor A je usmerjen zoper razred 1, ugovor B pa zoper razreda 1 in 2 izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU.
A decision is taken first in opposition A rejecting the contested application for Class 1.
Odločba se najprej sprejme v zvezi z ugovorom A, saj se z njo zavrne izpodbijana prijava za razred 1.
When the decision is notified to the parties of opposition A, opposition B must be suspended until the decision in opposition A is final and binding.
Ko je odločba vročena strankama ugovora A, je treba ugovor B začasno ustaviti, dokler odločba v zvezi z ugovorom A ni dokončna in zavezujoča.
Once the decision is final, the opponent of opposition B will be invited to inform the Office whether it wishes to maintain or withdraw its opposition in view of the amendment of the list of goods.
Ko je odločba dokončna, bo vložnik ugovora B pozvan, naj Urad obvesti, ali želi ob upoštevanju spremembe seznama blaga vztrajati pri svojem ugovoru ali ga umakniti.
If the opponent withdraws the opposition, the case is closed.
Če vložnik ugovora umakne ugovor, je zadeva končana.
In this situation, and if the case is closed after commencement of the adversarial part of the proceedings, the Office will issue a decision on costs in accordance with Article 109(3) EUTMR.
V takšnem primeru in če je zadeva končana po začetku kontradiktornega dela postopka, bo Urad sprejel odločitev o stroških v skladu s členom 109(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The opponent withdrew its opposition following the partial rejection of the contested trade mark.
Vložnik ugovora je ugovor umaknil po delni zavrnitvi izpodbijane znamke.
To this extent the opponent was successful in the proceedings.
V tem smislu je vložnik ugovora uspel v postopku.
However, the partial rejection of the trade mark was more restricted than the scope of the opposition.
Vendar je bila delna zavrnitev znamke bolj omejena kot obseg ugovora.
To this extent the applicant/holder was also successful in the proceedings.
V tem smislu je tudi prijavitelj/imetnik uspel v postopku.
Consequently, it is equitable that each party should bear its own costs.
Zato je pravično, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.
If the opponent maintains its opposition after the partial rejection, the proceedings continue and in the final decision on the substance the decision on costs is taken according to the normal rules.
Če vložnik ugovora po delni zavrnitvi vztraja pri svojem ugovoru, se postopek nadaljuje, v končni meritorni odločbi pa se o stroških odloči na podlagi običajnih pravil.
5.5.4.2 Rejection of an application on the basis of absolute grounds or formalities
Zavrnitev prijave na podlagi absolutnih razlogov ali formalnosti
An EUTM application can be rejected during an opposition procedure on absolute grounds for refusal (either on the basis of third party observations, Article 45 EUTMR, or ex officio if the case is reopened) or on formalities (e.g. if an applicant from outside the EEA is no longer represented under Article 119(2) EUTMR).
Prijava blagovne znamke EU se lahko zavrne med postopkom ugovora na podlagi absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev (na podlagi pripomb tretjih oseb, člen 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ali po uradni dolžnosti, če je zadeva znova odprta) ali na podlagi formalnosti (npr. če prijavitelj, ki ni iz EGP, nima več zastopnika na podlagi člena 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Once the rejection becomes final, the opposition proceedings are closed by issuing a notification.
Ko je zavrnitev dokončna, se postopek ugovora konča, tako da se pošlje uradno obvestilo.
In these situations the practice on costs is as follows.
V takšnih primerih je praksa pri stroških naslednja.
If the refusal becomes final after the expiry of the cooling-off period, a decision on costs is taken pursuant to Article 109(5) EUTMR.
Če zavrnitev postane dokončna po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, se odločitev o stroških sprejme v skladu s členom 109(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
If the same situation arises before commencement of the adversarial part, no decision on costs is to be taken.
Če tak položaj nastane pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela, se odločitev o stroških ne sprejme.
5.5.4.3 Cases of joinder
Združitev zadev
Article 9 EUTMDR
Člen 9 Delegirane uredbe
For further information on joinder, see paragraph 6.4.3, Joinder of proceedings, below.
Za dodatne informacije o združitvi zadev glej odstavek 6.4.3 v nadaljevanju, Združitev postopkov.
In cases where the joint opposition succeeds in its entirety the applicant should pay the opposition fees paid by each of the opponents but representation costs only once.
Kadar skupni ugovor uspe v celoti, mora prijavitelj plačati pristojbine za ugovor, ki jih je plačal vsak od vložnikov ugovora, stroške zastopanja pa samo enkrat.
If the applicant wins, its representation costs will be awarded once but each of the joint opponents will be liable for them.
Če v postopku uspe prijavitelj, bodo stroški zastopanja odobreni enkrat, vendar bo zanje odgovoren vsak od skupnih vložnikov ugovora.
A different apportionment of costs might be equitable.
Pravična je lahko različna porazdelitev stroškov.
In cases of partial success or if equitable for other reasons, each party should bear its own costs.
V primeru delnega uspeha ali če je to pravično iz drugih razlogov, mora vsaka stranka nositi svoje stroške.
5.5.4.4 The meaning of ‘bear one's own costs'
Pomen izraza nositi svoje stroške
The notion of costs comprises the opposition fee and the costs essential to the proceedings, as referred to in Article 109(1) EUTMR.
Pojem stroškov obsega pristojbino za ugovor in stroške, ki so nujni za potek postopka, kot je navedeno v členu 109(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In most cases the costs cover the remuneration of an agent within the limits of the scales set by the Regulation.
V večini primerov stroški krijejo plačilo za posrednika v okviru tarif iz uredbe.
‘Each party shall bear their own costs' means that no party has a claim against the other party.
„Vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške“ pomeni, da nobena stranka nima zahteve do druge stranke.
5.6 Fixing of costs
Določitev stroškov
Article 109(7) EUTMR
Člen 109(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Where the costs are limited to representation costs and the opposition fee, the decision fixing the amount of costs will be included in the decision on the apportionment of the costs (i.e. as a rule, in the decision on substance).
Če so stroški omejeni na stroške zastopanja in pristojbino za ugovor, bo odločitev o določitvi zneska stroškov vključena v odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov (tj. praviloma v meritorno odločbo).
This means that in the vast majority of cases, it will not be necessary to fix the amount of costs separately.
To pomeni, da zneska stroškov v veliki večini primerov ne bo treba določiti posebej.
The only exceptions are:
Edine izjeme so:
when an oral hearing took place;
če je bilo opravljeno ustno zaslišanje,
when the fixing of costs was inadvertently omitted (‘forgotten') in the main decision.
če je bila določitev stroškov v glavni odločbi nenamerno izpuščena (pozabljena).
5.6.1 Amounts to be reimbursed/fixed
Zneski, ki jih je treba povrniti/določiti
Article 85(1) and (6) EUTMDR
Člen 85(1) in (6) Delegirane uredbe
The amount to be reimbursed is always fixed in euros, regardless of the currency in which the party had to pay its representative.
Znesek, ki ga je treba povrniti, je vedno določen v evrih, in sicer ne glede na valuto, v kateri je morala stranka plačati svojega zastopnika.
If the opponent wins, the opposition fee will be reimbursed.
Če v postopku uspe vložnik ugovora, bo pristojbina za ugovor povrnjena.
As regards representation costs, the amount is limited to EUR 300.
Pri stroških zastopanja je znesek omejen na 300 EUR.
This applies both to the opponent and the applicant, provided that they were represented in the opposition procedure by a professional representative within the meaning of Article 120(1) EUTMR, irrespective of whether these costs have actually been incurred.
To velja za vložnika ugovora in prijavitelja, če ju je v postopku ugovora zastopal poklicni zastopnik v smislu člena 120(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, in sicer ne glede na to, ali so ti stroški dejansko nastali.
If the winning party was represented at some stage of the proceedings by a professional representative, but is no longer represented at the time of taking the decision on costs, it is also entitled to an award of costs regardless of when in the proceedings professional representation ceased.
Če je stranko, ki je uspela v postopku, v neki fazi postopka zastopal poklicni zastopnik, vendar v času sprejetja odločitve o stroških nima več zastopnika, je prav tako upravičena do odobritve stroškov, in sicer ne glede na to, kdaj v postopku se je poklicno zastopanje prenehalo.
Representation costs for employees, even from another company with economic connections, are not reimbursable and will not be fixed.
Stroški zastopanja za zaposlene, tudi iz drugega podjetja, s katerim je stranka gospodarsko povezana, niso povračljivi in ne bodo določeni.
They will not be addressed in the decision on costs.
V odločitvi o stroških ne bodo obravnavani.
For further information on representation, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 5, Professional Representation.
Za dodatne informacije o zastopanju glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
In the case of a joinder under Article 9(1) EUTMDR, where the oppositions are successful, the Office will fix both (or all) opposition fees (one for each opposition) but only one representation fee.
Če so v primeru združenih zadev v skladu s členom 9(1) Delegirane uredbe ugovori uspešni, bo Urad določil obe (ali vse) pristojbini(-e) za ugovor, vendar le en znesek za zastopanje.
As regards the costs of the opposition procedure, one single decision on the apportionment and on the fixing of costs must be taken for the opposition procedure as a whole.
V zvezi s stroški postopka ugovora mora biti sprejeta ena sama odločitev o porazdelitvi in določitvi stroškov za postopek ugovora kot celoto.
When a decision is annulled by the Boards of Appeal and remitted to the Opposition Division, the Opposition Division has to decide on the case again and will take a decision on and fix the costs in the usual way.
Če odbori za pritožbe razveljavijo odločitev in zadevo vrnejo v odločanje oddelku za ugovore, mora oddelek za ugovore znova odločati o zadevi, pri čemer bo o stroških odločil in jih določil, kot je običajno.
If this decision is appealed again (and not remitted for a second time) the Board will decide on and fix the costs in the usual way.
Če je zoper to odločbo znova vložena pritožba (o kateri se ne odloča znova), bo odbor o stroških odločil in jih določil kot običajno.
5.6.2 Procedure if the fixing of costs is contained in the main decision
Postopek, če so stroški določeni v glavni odločbi
Where the decision fixing the amount of costs is included in the decision on the apportionment of the costs, no bill or proof whatsoever is needed.
Če je odločitev o določitvi zneska stroškov vključena v odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov, ni potreben nikakršen obračun stroškov ali dokaz.
The Office knows that the opposition fee was paid and, if there is a representative, EUR 300 must be awarded irrespective of any evidence.
Urad ve, da je bila pristojbina za ugovor plačana, in če obstaja zastopnik, je treba ne glede na kakršne koli dokaze odobriti 300 EUR.
It is assumed that the costs of representation have been of at least EUR 300.
Predpostavlja se, da so stroški zastopanja znašali najmanj 300 EUR.
Therefore, no correspondence with the parties about the amount to be fixed is necessary.
Zato ni potrebno nikakršno dopisovanje s strankama glede zneska, ki ga je treba določiti.
The fixing of the amount is automatic.
Znesek se določi samodejno.
5.6.3 Procedure if a separate fixing of costs is needed
Postopek, če je treba stroške določiti posebej
The following procedural requirements apply in the rare cases where a separate fixing of costs must be made (including when it was inadvertently omitted, in which case the party concerned must also comply with the applicable requirements):
V redkih primerih, kadar je treba stroške določiti posebej (tudi kadar je bila ta določitev nenamerno izpuščena, pri čemer mora zadevna stranka v takšnem primeru ravnati tudi v skladu z zahtevami, ki se uporabljajo), se uporabljata naslednji postopkovni zahtevi:
admissibility
dopustnost,
evidence.
dokazi.
5.6.3.1 Admissibility
Dopustnost
The request for fixation of costs is only admissible once the decision in respect of which the fixing of costs is required has become final and up to 2 months after that date.
Zahteva za določitev stroškov je dopustna šele, ko je odločba, v zvezi s katero se zahteva določitev stroškov, postala dokončna in najpozneje dva meseca po tem datumu.
5.6.3.2 Evidence
Dokazi
For awarding the opposition fee, no evidence is needed.
Za odobritev pristojbine za ugovor dokazi niso potrebni.
For awarding the representation costs at the standard rate, an assurance by the representative that the costs have been incurred is sufficient.
Za odobritev stroškov zastopanja po pavšalni stopnji zadostuje zagotovilo zastopnika, da so nastali stroški.
A fortiori, if a bill is presented, it suffices that it shows at least the reimbursable amount; it does not matter whether or not it is addressed to the party to the proceedings, as submitting a bill equals an assurance.
Če je predložen obračun stroškov, zadostuje že, da je v njem naveden vsaj znesek za povračilo; ni pomembno, ali je naslovljen na stranko v postopku ali ne, saj je predložitev obračuna stroškov enakovredna zagotovilu.
For all other costs (which will apply in extremely rare cases), a bill and supporting evidence are needed, but it suffices that these make it plausible (rather than provide fully fledged proof) that the costs have been incurred.
Za vse druge stroške (ki se pojavljajo zelo redko) so potrebni obračun stroškov in dokazov, vendar zadostuje že, da je iz njih očitno razvidno, da so stroški nastali (in ne da zagotavljajo popolne dokaze).
5.6.4 Review of fixing of costs
Ponovna presoja določitve stroškov
Article 109(8) EUTMR
Člen 109(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
If one of the parties disagrees with the amounts fixed, it can ask for a review of the decision.
Če se ena od strank ne strinja z določenimi zneski, lahko zahteva ponovno presojo odločitve.
The request must state the reasons and be filed within 1 month of the date of notification of the fixation.
Zahtevo mora obrazložiti in jo vložiti v enem mesecu od datuma uradnega obvestila o določitvi.
The request is only deemed to be filed when the fee for review of EUR 100 has been paid.
Zahteva se šteje za vloženo le, če je plačana pristojbina za ponovno presojo v višini 100 EUR.
There are no reimbursable costs in the review procedure (16/12/2004, R 503/20014, BIOLACT / BIO).
Stroški v postopku ponovne presoje se ne povrnejo (16/12/2004, R 503/20014, BIOLACT / BIO).
6 Procedural Issues
Postopkovna vprašanja
6.1 Correction of mistakes
Popravljanje napak
Applying Article 49(2) EUTMR, which refers to the EUTM application, by analogy, obvious mistakes in the notice of opposition may be corrected.
Očitne napake v ugovoru se lahko popravijo tako, da se po analogiji uporabi člen 49(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki se nanaša na prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
The Office considers ‘obvious error' in relation to Article 49(2) EUTMR and Article 102(1) EUTMR to be understood as meaning mistakes that obviously require correction, in the sense that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as the correction.
Urad glede na člen 49(2) in člen 102(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU meni, da je treba „očitno napako“ razumeti kot napako, ki jo je očitno treba popraviti, in sicer v smislu, da ne bi bilo mišljeno nič drugega kot tisto, kar se ponuja kot popravek.
For example, if the opponent's details appear where the representative's should appear, this can be considered an obvious mistake.
Na primer, če so podatki o vložniku ugovora navedeni tam, kjer bi morali biti navedeni podatki o zastopniku, se to lahko šteje za očitno napako.
6.1.2 Correction of mistakes and errors in publications
Popravljanje napak in pomot v objavah
Article 44(3) EUTMR
Člen 44(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Where the publication of the application contains a mistake or error attributable to the Office, the Office will correct the mistake or error on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant.
Če objava prijave vsebuje napako ali pomoto, ki jo je mogoče pripisati Uradu, bo Urad napako ali pomoto popravil na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo prijavitelja.
The corrections effected under this rule have to be published.
Popravke, izvedene na podlagi tega pravila, je treba objaviti.
If the correction concerns mistakes that do not affect the opposition, it will be published when the EUTM is registered.
Če se popravek nanaša na napake, ki ne vplivajo na ugovor, se ga objavi, ko je blagovna znamka EU registrirana.
Where the correction leads to an extension of the list of goods or services or concerns the representation of the mark, a new opposition period is opened, but only in respect of the corrected parts.
Če popravek povzroči razširitev seznama blaga ali storitev oziroma se nanaša na prikaz znamke, se določi nov rok za vložitev ugovora, vendar le v zvezi s popravljenimi deli.
If oppositions were filed after the ‘first' publication of the EUTM application, the opponents will have to be informed of the republication.
Če so bili ugovori vloženi po „prvi“ objavi prijave blagovne znamke EU, bo treba vložnike ugovorov obvestiti tudi o ponovni objavi.
The opponents that opposed the ‘first' publication do not have to file a new opposition.
Vložnikom ugovorov, ki so ugovor vložili zoper prvo objavo, ni treba vložiti novega ugovora.
The proceedings must be suspended until the opposition period following the ‘second' publication has expired.
Postopek je treba začasno ustaviti, dokler se ne izteče rok za vložitev ugovora v zvezi z drugo objavo.
If a ‘first publication opponent' wishes to withdraw its opposition as a consequence of the republication, the proceedings should be closed and the opposition fee should be refunded (see paragraph 5.4.1.2 above).
Če želi „vložnik ugovora zoper prvo objavo“ umakniti svoj ugovor na podlagi ponovne objave, je treba postopek končati, pristojbino za ugovor pa povrniti (glej odstavek 5.4.1.2 zgoraj).
6.2 Time limits
Roki
Articles 101(1) and 146(9) EUTMR
Člen 101(1) in člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 63 EUTMDR
Člen 63 Delegirane uredbe
Time limits are an essential tool for conducting orderly and reasonably swift proceedings.
Roki so osnovno orodje za vodenje pravilnih in razumno hitrih postopkov.
They are a matter of public policy, and rigorous compliance with them is necessary for ensuring clarity and legal certainty.
Spadajo v javno politiko, njihovo dosledno izpolnjevanje pa je nujno za zagotavljanje jasnosti in pravne varnosti.
For general information on time limits and continuation of proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits.
Za splošne informacije o rokih in nadaljevanju postopka glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
6.2.1 Extension of time limits in opposition proceedings
Podaljšanje rokov v postopku ugovora
6.2.1.1 Non-extendable and extendable time limits
Roki, ki jih ni mogoče podaljšati, in tisti, ki jih je mogoče podaljšati
Article 101(1) EUTMR
Člen 101(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
A time limit cannot be extended if its length is set by the Regulation.
Roka ni mogoče podaljšati, če je njegovo trajanje določeno z uredbo.
the 3-month opposition period to file an opposition;
Člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 46(3) EUTMR
trimesečni rok za vložitev ugovora;
the 3-month time limit to pay the opposition fee;
Člen 46(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 141(3) EUTMR
trimesečni rok za plačilo pristojbine za ugovor;
the 2-month time limit to remedy deficiencies according to Article 5(5) EUTMDR.
dvomesečni rok za odpravo pomanjkljivosti v skladu s členom 5(5) Delegirane uredbe.
Rule 101(1) EUTMR
Člen 101(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The length of extendable time limits is specified by the Office.
Roki, ki jih je mogoče podaljšati, so tako dolgi, kot določi Urad.
For example, the time limit to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition is an extendable time limit.
Na primer, rok za predložitev pripomb v odgovor na ugovor je rok, ki ga je mogoče podaljšati.
6.2.1.2 Request made in time
Pravočasno vložena prošnja
Note that extensions of the cooling-off period have a special regime.
Treba je upoštevati, da za podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje velja posebna ureditev.
For further details, see above under paragraph 3.2, Extension of the cooling-off period.
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej odstavek 3.2 zgoraj, Podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje.
For an extension to be granted, the request has to fulfil the following conditions:
Za odobritev podaljšanja morajo biti izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji:
the time limit must be extendable;
rok mora biti mogoče podaljšati,
the extension has to be requested by the party concerned or jointly by both parties;
za podaljšanje mora zaprositi zadevna stranka ali obe stranki skupaj,