natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To fall foul of Article 7(1)(h) EUTMR, a trade mark:
Da bi bila blagovna znamka v nasprotju s členom 7(1)(h) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, mora:
must consist solely of an identical reproduction or a ‘heraldic imitation' of the abovementioned symbols; or
biti sestavljena samo iz enake reprodukcije ali heraldične imitacije zgoraj navedenih simbolov ali
must contain an identical reproduction or a ‘heraldic imitation' of the abovementioned symbols.
vključevati enako upodobitev ali heraldično imitacijo zgoraj navedenih simbolov.
Furthermore, the competent authority must not have given its authorisation (see paragraph 4 below).
Poleg tega pristojni organ ne sme izdati svoje odobritve (glej odstavek 4 v nadaljevanju).
In principle, prohibition of the imitation of an emblem applies only to imitations of it from a heraldic perspective, that is to say, those that contain heraldic connotations that distinguish the emblem from other signs.
Prepoved imitacije emblema načeloma velja samo za imitacije emblema s heraldičnega vidika, kar pomeni tiste imitacije, ki vključujejo heraldične konotacije, zaradi katerih se emblem razlikuje od drugih znakov.
Therefore, protection against any imitation from a heraldic point of view refers not to the image itself, but to its heraldic expression.
Zato se zaščita pred kakršno koli imitacijo s heraldičnega vidika ne nanaša na samo podobo, temveč tudi na heraldični izraz.
Therefore, it is necessary to consider the heraldic description of the emblem at issue to determine whether the trade mark contains an imitation from a heraldic point of view, (16/07/2009, C202/08 P & C208/08 P, RW feuille d'érable, EU:C:2009:477, § 48; 05/05/2011, T41/10, esf école du ski français (fig.), EU:T:2011:200, § 25).
Zato je nujno treba upoštevati heraldični opis zadevnega emblema. da bi se ugotovilo, ali blagovna znamka vključuje imitacijo s heraldičnega vidika (16/07/2009, C202/08 P & C208/08 P, RW feuille d'érable, EU:C:2009:477, § 48; 05/05/2011, T41/10, esf école du ski français (fig.), EU:T:2011:200, § 25).
It follows from the above that, in the course of trade mark examination, as a first step, both the protected ‘emblem' and the sign applied for must be considered from a heraldic perspective.
Na podlagi navedenega sledi, da je treba pri prvem koraku preizkušanja blagovne znamke zaščiteni emblem in znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava, obravnavati s heraldičnega vidika.
Nonetheless, the Court ruled that as far as ‘imitation from a heraldic point of view' is concerned, a difference detected by a specialist in heraldic art between the trade mark applied for and the state emblem will not necessarily be perceived by the average consumer and, therefore, in spite of differences at the level of certain heraldic details, the contested trade mark may be an imitation of the emblem in question within the meaning of Article 6ter PC (16/07/2009, C202/08 P & C208/08 P, RW feuille d'érable, EU:C:2009:477, § 50 et seq.; 25/05/2011, T397/09, Suscipere et finire, EU:T:2011:246, § 24-25).
Kljub temu je Sodišče odločilo, da v zvezi s „posnemanjem v heraldičnem pogledu“ razlike, ki jo ugotovi strokovnjak za heraldično umetnost med blagovno znamko, za katero je bila vložena prijava, in državnim emblemom, povprečen potrošnik ne bo nujno opazil, zato je kljub razlikam na ravni določenih heraldičnih podrobnosti izpodbijana blagovna znamka lahko imitacija zadevnega emblema v smislu člena 6ter Pariške konvencije (16/07/2009, C202/08 P & C208/08 P, RW feuille d'érable, EU:C:2009:477, § 50 et seq.; 25/05/2011, T397/09, Suscipere et finire, EU:T:2011:246, § 24-25).
To apply Article 7(1)(h) EUTMR, it can therefore be sufficient that the average consumer, despite some differences in heraldic details, can see in the mark an imitation of the ‘emblem'.
Za uporabo člena 7(1)(h) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU torej lahko zadostuje, da povprečni potrošnik kljub nekaterim razlikam v heraldičnih podrobnostih lahko v znamki zazna imitacijo „emblema“.
There may, for example, be imitation when the mark contains the main element of, or part of, the ‘emblem' protected under Article 6ter PC.
Za imitacijo gre na primer lahko, kadar blagovna znamka vključuje glavni element ali del „emblema“, zaščitenega na podlagi člena 6ter Pariške konvencije.
That element need not necessarily be identical to the emblem in question.
Ni nujno, da je element enak zadevnemu emblemu.
The fact that the emblem in question is stylised or that only part of the emblem is used does not necessarily mean that there is no imitation from a heraldic point of view (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
Dejstvo, da je zadevni emblem stiliziran ali da je uporabljen samo del emblema, ne pomeni nujno, da ni nobene imitacije s heraldičnega vidika (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
The EUTM applied for contains a protected ‘emblem'
Blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, vključuje zaščiteni emblem
As a first step, it is important that the examiner identifies the various elements of the EUTM applied for and establishes the part that is considered to be the reproduction or heraldic imitation of an ‘emblem' protected under Article 6ter PC.
Najprej je pomembno, da preizkuševalec opredeli različne elemente blagovne znamke EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, in določi del, ki šteje za reprodukcijo ali heraldično imitacijo emblema, zaščitenega na podlagi člena 6ter Pariške konvencije.
The size of the protected emblem contained in the EUTM is irrelevant, as long as it is legible and perceivable.
Velikost zaščitenega emblema, vključenega v blagovno znamko EU, ni pomembna, dokler je emblem čitljiv in prepoznaven.
The fact that the EUTM applied for also contains word elements does not in itself preclude application of Article 6ter PC (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
Dejstvo, da blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, vključuje tudi besedne elemente, samo po sebi ne izključuje uporabe člena 6ter Pariške konvencije (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
On the contrary, such a word element may even strengthen the link between the EUTM application and an emblem (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120, § 66 et seq.; 28/10/2014, R 1577/20144, SWISS CONCEPT, § 33).
Nasprotno, tak besedni element lahko celo okrepi povezavo med prijavo blagovne znamke EU in emblemom (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120, § 66 et seq.; 28/10/2014, R 1577/20144, SWISS CONCEPT, § 33).
Heraldic imitation found
ugotovljena heraldična imitacija
Heraldic imitation not found
Heraldična imitacija ni bila ugotovljena.
The fact that the EUTM applied for contains only part of the protected ‘emblem' does not mean that there may not be an imitation from a heraldic point of view (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
Dejstvo, da je blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, vključuje samo del zaščitenega „emblema“, ne pomeni, da ni imitacije s heraldičnega vidika (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 41).
As regards the flag of the European Union, its essential element is the circle of twelve golden mullets (stars) (14/07/2011, R 1903/20101, A (fig.), § 17).
Bistveni element zastave Evropske unije je krog z dvanajstimi zlatimi zvezdami (14/07/2011, R 1903/20101, A (fig.), § 17).
However, to qualify as a heraldic imitation, it is not necessary for all the stars to be present in the EUTM applied for (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120).
Da pa bi šlo za heraldično imitacijo, ni nujno, da blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, vključuje vse zvezde (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120).
The exact orientation of the stars is irrelevant (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12).
Natančna usmerjenost zvezdic ni pomembna (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12).
The same is true with respect to their colour (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 43 for silver; 13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120, § 48 for red; 14/07/2011, R 1903/20101 A (fig.), § 17 for blue).
Enako velja za njihovo barvo (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 43 za srebrno barvo; 13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120, § 48 za rdečo barvo; 14/07/2011, R 1903/20101 A (fig.), § 17 za modro barvo).
Earlier case-law of the Boards of Appeal, such as decisions of 11/10/2011, R 1991/20104, EASI EUROPEAN ALLIANCE SOLUTIONS INNOVATIONS and R 5/20114, TEN, which did not follow the approach taken above, was overruled by the General Court (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120).
Prejšnjo prakso odbora za pritožbe, kot sta odločbi 11/10/2011, R 1991/20104, EASI EUROPEAN ALLIANCE SOLUTIONS INNOVATIONS in R 5/20114, TEN, pri čemer ni bil upoštevan zgornji pristop, je Splošno sodišče razveljavilo (13/03/2014, T430/12, European Network Rapid Manufacturing, EU:T:2014:120).
Main characteristics/part of the emblem incorporated in the trade mark
Glavne značilnosti/deli emblema, vključenega v blagovno znamko
Main characteristics/part of the protected emblem not incorporated in the trade mark
Glavne značilnosti/deli zaščitenega emblema, ki niso vključeni v blagovno znamko
Black and white representations of the protected emblem
Črno-bele predstavitve zaščitenega emblema
Flags are often reproduced in black and white; therefore, a black and white depiction of a protected emblem (or vice versa) may still be considered a heraldic imitation (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 45; 28/02/2008, T215/06, RW feuille d'érable, EU:T:2008:55, § 68).
Reprodukcije zastav so pogosto črno-bele, zato lahko črno-beli prikaz zaščitenega emblema (ali obratno) še vedno velja za heraldično imitacijo (21/04/2004, T127/02, ECA, EU:T:2004:110, § 45; 28/02/2008, T215/06, RW feuille d'érable, EU:T:2008:55, § 68).
However, if the black and white depiction does not allow recognition of a specific flag, there is no heraldic imitation.
Če na podlagi črno-belega prikaza zadevne zastave ni mogoče prepoznati, ne gre za heraldično imitacijo.
Changes in colour
Spremembe barv
The use of silver v gold is important in heraldry.
Uporaba srebrne barve namesto zlate je zelo pomembna v heraldiki.
However, average consumers will not necessarily recognise this difference in colour; indeed, they will not even give it any importance (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 43).
Vendar povprečni potrošniki ne bodo nujno prepoznali te razlike v barvi oziroma temu sploh ne bodo pripisali nobenega pomena (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 43).
Slight differences in the actual colour are irrelevant (light blue v dark blue).
Majhne razlike v dejanski barvi niso pomembne (svetlo modra proti temno modri).
Heraldry does not normally distinguish between different tones of the same colour (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 42).
Heraldika običajno ne razlikuje med različnimi odtenki iste barve (15/01/2013, T413/11, European Driveshaft Services, EU:T:2013:12, § 42).
Furthermore, gold is often reproduced as yellow (20/05/2009, R 1041/20081, kultur IN DEUTSCHLAND + EUROPA (fig.), § 33); consequently, this difference has no impact on the assessment.
Poleg tega se zlata barva pogosto prikaže kot rumena (20/05/2009, R 1041/20081, kultur IN DEUTSCHLAND + EUROPA (fig.), § 33), zato ta razlika na presojo ne vpliva.
3 Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR - Emblems not Protected under Article 6ter PC
Člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU - Emblemi, ki niso zaščiteni na podlagi člena 6ter Pariške konvencije
3.1 Objective of Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR
Cilj člena 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR applies to all other badges, emblems or escutcheons that
Člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se uporablja za vsa druga znamenja, embleme ali grbe, ki
have not been communicated in accordance with Article 6ter(3)(a) PC, regardless of whether they are the emblems of a state or international intergovernmental organisation within the meaning of Article 6ter(1)(a) or (b) PC, or of public bodies or administrations other than those covered by Article 6ter PC, such as provinces or municipalities
niso bili sporočeni v skladu s členom 6ter(3)(a) Pariške konvencije, ne glede na to, ali so to emblemi države ali mednarodne medvladne organizacije v smislu člena 6ter(1)(a) ali (b) Pariške konvencije oziroma javnih organov ali uprav, ki niso zajeti v členu 6ter Pariške konvencije, kot so pokrajine ali občine;
and
ter
are of particular public interest,
ki so posebnega javnega pomena;
unless the competent authority has consented to their registration.
razen če je pristojni organ zanje izdal dovoljenje za registracijo.
Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR does not define symbols of ‘particular public interest'.
V členu 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU simboli posebnega javnega pomena niso opredeljeni.
The nature of these symbols could vary and could include, for example, symbols of public bodies or administrations, such as provinces or municipalities.
Narava teh simbolov se lahko razlikuje in vključuje na primer simbole javnih organov ali uprav, kot so pokrajine ali občine.
In any case, the ‘particular public interest' involved must be reflected in a public document, for example a national or international legal instrument, regulation or other normative act.
Vsekakor mora biti zadevni posebni javni pomen upoštevan v javnem dokumentu, na primer nacionalnem ali mednarodnem pravnem aktu, uredbi ali drugem normativnem aktu.
The General Court stated that a ‘particular public interest' existed when the emblem had a particular link with one of the activities carried out by an international intergovernmental organisation (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364, § 44).
Splošno sodišče je navedlo, da „poseben javni pomen“ obstaja, kadar ima emblem posebno povezavo z eno od dejavnosti, ki jih opravlja mednarodna medvladna organizacija (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364, § 44).
In particular, the Court specified that Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR also applied when the emblem merely related to one of the areas of activity of the European Union, even if that activity concerned only certain EU Member States (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364, § 45-46).
Sodišče je pojasnilo zlasti, da se člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporablja tudi, kadar se emblem nanaša na le eno področje dejavnosti Evropske unije, tudi če se ta dejavnost nanaša samo na nekatere države članice EU (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364, § 45-46).
This confirms that the protection afforded by Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR also applies to symbols that are of particular public interest in only a single Member State or part thereof (Article 7(2) EUTMR).
To potrjuje, da se varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, uporablja tudi za simbole, ki so posebnega javnega pomena v samo eni državi članici ali njenem delu (člen 7(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
According to the case-law, Article 7(1)(i) and (h) EUTMR both have a similar scope of application and grant equivalent levels of protection.
V skladu s sodno prakso ima člen 7(1)(i) in (h) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU podobno področje uporabe in podeljuje enakovredno raven varstva.
Therefore, Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR covers identical reproduction (full or partial) in a trade mark of the abovementioned symbols, as well as their heraldic imitation.
Člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zajema torej identično reprodukcijo (celotno ali delno) zgoraj navedenih simbolov v blagovni znamki ter njihovo heraldično imitacijo.
Following the same line of reasoning, Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR applies where the mark is liable to mislead the public as to the existence of a connection between the owner of the trade mark and the body to which the abovementioned symbols refer.
V skladu s to utemeljitvijo se člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporablja, če bi znamka lahko zavajala javnost glede obstoja povezave med imetnikom znamke in organom, na katere se nanašajo zgoraj navedeni simboli.
In other words, the protection afforded by Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR is conditional on a link between the mark and the symbol (no absolute protection).
Z drugimi besedami, varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je odvisno od povezave med znamko in simbolom (ni popolnega varstva).
Otherwise, trade marks to which Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR applies would obtain broader protection than under Article 7(1)(h) EUTMR (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364).
Blagovne znamke, za katere se uporablja člen 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bi drugače pridobil širše varstvo, kot ga zagotavlja člen 7(1)(h) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (10/07/2013, T3/12, Member of €e euro experts, EU:T:2013:364).
3.2 Protected symbols
Zaščiteni simboli
The following signs (not covered by Article 6ter PC) enjoy special protection under Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR:
Naslednji znaki (ki niso zajeti v členu 6ter Pariške konvencije) uživajo posebno varstvo na podlagi člena 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU:
the symbols protected under the Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols, that is to say, the red cross, the red crescent and the red crystal emblems and their names (https://www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law/emblem);
simboli, zaščiteni na podlagi Ženevskih konvencij in dodatnih protokolov k tem konvencijam, tj. rdeči križ, rdeči polmesec in rdeči kristal ter njihova imena (https://www.icrc.org/en/war-and-law/emblem);
However, a number of well-known red crosses have traditionally been used and are still in use, the incorporation of which in a mark would not be considered a reproduction/heraldic imitation of the ‘Red Cross'.
Vendar so se tradicionalno uporabljali in se še uporabljajo številni znani rdeči križi, katerih vključitev v znamko se ne bi štela za reprodukcijo/heraldično imitacijo Rdečega križa.
Examples of these crosses include the following:
Primeri teh križev vključujejo:
the Olympic Symbol protected under the Nairobi Treaty on the Protection of the Olympic Symbol (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=287432)
olimpijski simbol, zaščiten na podlagi Nairobijske pogodbe o varstvu olimpijskega simbola (http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=287432)
The same rules as set out above concerning the heraldic imitation and authorisations also apply with respect to Article 7(1)(i) EUTMR.
Ista pravila, ki so določena zgoraj v zvezi s heraldično imitacijo in dovoljeni, veljajo tudi v zvezi s členom 7(1)(i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Reproduction/heraldic imitation found
Ugotovljena reprodukcija/heraldična imitacija
Reproduction/heraldic imitation not found
Reprodukcija/heraldična imitacija ni bila ugotovljena.
4 Exceptions
Izjeme
The EUTM applied for can be registered despite Article 7(1)(h) and (i) EUTMR if the applicant provides the Office with the authorisation to include the protected emblem or parts of it in its trade mark.
Blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, se lahko registrira kljub členu 7(1)(h) in (i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če prijavitelj Uradu zagotovi dovoljenje za vključitev zaščitenega emblema ali njegovega dela v svojo blagovno znamko.
The authorisation must cover registration as a trade mark or as a part thereof.
Dovoljenje mora zajemati registracijo za blagovno znamko ali njen del.
Authorisation to use the protected emblem is not sufficient.
Dovoljenje za uporabo zaščitenega emblema ne zadostuje.
It is up to the applicant to submit the authorisation.
Za predložitev dovoljenj mora poskrbeti prijavitelj.
The Office cannot enquire as to whether an authorisation exists, either on an individual or general level.
Urad ne more preverjati, ali dovoljenje obstaja, ne na individualni ne na splošni ravni.
Even in cases where general announcements or authorisations are rendered by competent authorities under national law to use a protected emblem in trade, and these are submitted by the applicant, it should be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis whether such authorisations specifically authorise the use of an emblem in a trade mark (26/02/2015, R 1166/20141, ALPENBAUER BAYERISCHE BONBONLUTSCHKULTUR (fig.), § 23-29).
Tudi kadar pristojni organi na podlagi nacionalnega prava izdajo splošna obvestila ali dovoljenja za uporabo zaščitenega emblema v trgovini in kadar jih prijavitelj predloži, je treba od primera do primera natančno proučiti, ali taka dovoljenja izrecno dovoljujejo uporabo emblema v blagovni znamki (26/02/2015, R 1166/20141, ALPENBAUER BAYERISCHE BONBONLUTSCHKULTUR (fig.), § 23-29).
It is also important to mention that the provisions of Article 7(1)(h) and (i) EUTMR are not applicable to trade marks that were registered either before receipt of the notification from WIPO or less than 2 months after receipt of said notification.
Pomembno je omeniti še, da se določbe člena 7(1)(h) in (i) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne uporabljajo za blagovne znamke, ki so bile registrirane pred prejetjem obvestila organizacije WIPO ali manj kot dva meseca po prejetju navedenega obvestila.
State flags that are not submitted to WIPO enjoy protection only against trade marks that were registered after 06/11/1925.
Državne zastave, ki niso bile predložene organizaciji WIPO, uživajo varstvo samo v zvezi z blagovnimi znamkami, registriranimi po 6. novembru 1925.
If an EUTM applied for contains or consists of the heraldic imitation of emblems of two or more states, which are similar, it is sufficient to present authorisation from one of them (Article 6ter(8) PC).
Če blagovna znamka EU, za katero je bila vložena prijava, vključuje heraldično imitacijo podobnih emblemov dveh ali več držav ali jo ta sestavlja, zadostuje dovoljenje ene od teh držav (člen 6ter(8) Pariške konvencije).
Protected under ES5.
Zaščiten na podlagi ES5.
Protected under DE34 (flag of the federal state of Berlin).
Zaščitena na podlagi DE34 (zastava zvezne dežele Berlin).
Protected under NL48.
Zaščitena na podlagi NL48.
Protected under US1.
Zaščiten na podlagi US1.
Protected under BR6 for tourism; national and international promotion and advertising; marketing studies; business management; business administration; and office functions.
Zaščiten na podlagi BR6 za turizem; nacionalna in mednarodna promocija in oglaševanje; marketinške študije; upravljanje podjetij; poslovno upravljanje in naloge služb.
Protected under QO60.
Zaščiten na podlagi QO60.
Protected under QO1.
Zaščiten na podlagi QO1.
Protected under QO1248.
Zaščiten na podlagi QP1248.
Protected under QO884 for the AFRICAN UNION.
Zaščiten na podlagi QP884 za AFRIŠKO UNIJO.
Flag Sign applied for
Zastava Znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava
EUTM application No 10 502 714; 17/06/2013, R 1291/20122, WHO WANTS TO BE A FOOTBALL MILLIONAIRE (fig.)
10 502 714, 17/06/2013, R 1291/20122, WHO WANTS TO BE A FOOTBALL MILLIONAIRE (fig.)
The colours are recognisable and follow the structure of the flags.
Barve so prepoznavne in sledijo strukturi zastav.
The slight degree of stylisation does not take it outside the scope of heraldic imitation.
Francoska zastava 18/03/2015, R 1731/20131, LAPIN NA LA NOUVELLE AGRICULTURE (fig.)
French flag 18/03/2015, R 1731/20131, LAPIN NA LA NOUVELLE AGRICULTURE (fig.)
Francoska zastava je vključena v blagovno znamko.
The French flag is incorporated into the trade mark.
Čeprav je majhna, jo je mogoče takoj prepoznati.
Although it is small, it is immediately recognisable.
Emblem (Bavarska), zaščiten na podlagi DE26.
The Board of Appeal took into account the heraldic description of the protected emblems in order to consider whether there was a heraldic imitation (paras 24 and 27).
Odbor za pritožbe je upošteval heraldični opis zaščitenih emblemov, da bi proučil, ali gre za heraldično imitacijo (točki 24 in 27).