natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to Article 33(3) EUTMR, the Office does not object to the use of any of the general indications of the class headings provided that this identification is sufficiently clear and precise .
Urad v skladu s členom 33(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne nasprotuje uporabi katere koli splošne označbe iz naslovov razredov, če je ta opredelitev dovolj jasna in natančna.
[3: See the ‘Common Communication on the Common Practice on the General Indications of the Nice Class Headings'.]
[3: Glej Skupno sporočilo o skupni praksi pri splošnih označbah naslovov razredov Nicejske klasifikacije.]
According to Article 33(5) EUTMR, the use of general terms or general indications of the class headings will be interpreted as including all the goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indication or term.
Če se v skladu s členom 33(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporabijo splošni izrazi ali splošne označbe iz naslovov razredov, se razlagajo, kot da vključujejo vse blago ali storitve, ki so jasno zajete z dobesednim pomenom označbe ali izraza.
The use of such terms will not be interpreted as comprising a claim to goods or services that cannot be so understood.
Uporaba takšnih izrazov se ne razlaga, kot da vključujejo zahtevo za blago ali storitve, ki jih ni mogoče tako razumeti.
Under Article 33(8) EUTMR, during the 6-month period ending on 24/09/2016, proprietors of European Union trade marks filed before 22/06/2012 and registered for the entire heading of a Nice class had the opportunity to declare that their intention at the time of filing had been to cover goods and services going beyond the literal meaning of that class heading, provided that the goods or services declared were included in the alphabetical list for the class of the edition of the Nice Classification in force on the date of filing.
V skladu s členom 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU so imetniki blagovnih znamk EU, za katere je bila prijava vložena pred 22. junijem 2012 in so registrirane za celoten naslov razreda Nicejske klasifikacije, v šestmesečnem obdobju, ki se je končalo 24. septembra 2016, lahko izjavili, da je bil njihov namen na dan vložitve zahtevati varstvo za blago ali storitve v širšem pomenu blaga in storitev, zajetih v dobesednem pomenu naslova zadevnega razreda, če so bili prijavljeno blago ali storitve vključeni v abecedni seznam tega razreda izdaje Nicejske klasifikacije, ki je veljala na dan vložitve.
According to Article 33(8) EUTMR, last sentence, from the expiry of the 6-month period following the entry into force of the Amending Regulation, all European Union trade marks registered in respect of the entire heading of a Nice class for which no declaration has been filed, will be deemed to extend only to goods or services clearly covered by the literal meaning of the indications included in the heading of the relevant class.
V skladu z zadnjim stavkom člena 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU po izteku šestmesečnega obdobja po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) 2015/2424 za vse blagovne znamke EU, registrirane za celoten naslov razreda Nicejske klasifikacije in za katere ni predložena nobena izjava, velja, da zajemajo le blago ali storitve, ki so jasno zajete v dobesednem pomenu označb, vključenih v naslov zadevnega razreda.
Declarations for European Union trade marks filed within the relevant period will take effect from the moment of their entry in the Register.
Izjave za blagovne znamke Evropske unije, vložene v zadevnem obdobju, bodo začele veljati od trenutka njihovega vpisa v register.
Where the declaration is accepted and the Register is amended, Article 33(9) EUTMR will apply.
Če je izjava sprejeta in se register spremeni, se bo uporabljal člen 33(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
According to Article 33(9) EUTMR, the amendment of a list of goods or services recorded in the Register following a declaration under Article 33(8) EUTMR made during the 6-month period after the entry into force of the Regulation, cannot give the proprietor of a European Union trade mark the right to oppose or to apply for a declaration of invalidity in respect of a later mark where and to the extent that (i) the later trade mark was in use for, or an application had been made to register the later trade mark for, goods or services before the Register was amended for the earlier mark and (ii) the use in relation to those goods or services did not infringe, or would not have infringed, the proprietor's rights based on the literal meaning of the record of the goods or services in the Register at that time.
Člen 33(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da sprememba seznama blaga ali storitev, vpisanih v register po izjavi na podlagi člena 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, podani v šestmesečnem obdobju po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe, imetniku blagovne znamke Evropske unije ne daje pravice, da nasprotuje ali zahteva ugotovitev ničnosti poznejše blagovne znamke, če in kolikor (i) se je poznejša blagovna znamka bodisi že uporabljala ali je bila prijava za registracijo poznejše blagovne znamke za blago ali storitve vložena pred spremembo registra za prejšnjo znamko in (ii z uporabo blagovne znamke v zvezi s tem blagom ali storitvami niso bile kršene ali se ne bi kršile pravice imetnika na podlagi dobesednega pomena blaga in storitev, ki so bili v tistem času vpisani v registru.
In practice, this means that, where the earlier mark is a European Union trade mark and the contested mark was filed, or was in use, before the Register was amended under Article 33(8) EUTMR for the earlier European Union trade mark, the goods and services identified as going beyond the literal meaning of the class heading will not be taken into account in oppositions or declarations of invalidity filed after the entry into force of the Amending Regulation.
V praksi to pomeni, da če je prejšnja blagovna znamka blagovna znamka Evropske unije in je bila prijava izpodbijane blagovne znamke vložena oziroma se je izpodbijana blagovna znamka uporabljala pred spremembo registra v skladu s členom 33(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU za prejšnjo blagovno znamko Evropske unije, se blago in storitve, ki presegajo dobesedni pomen naslova zadevnega razreda, ne bodo upoštevali pri ugovorih ali zahtevah za ugotovitev ničnosti, vloženih po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (EU) 2015/2424.
As regards the scope of protection of national marks, the Office and all national trade mark offices of the European Union issued a Common Communication on the implementation of the IP Translator judgment.
Kar zadeva obseg varstva nacionalnih blagovnih znamk, so Urad in vsi nacionalni uradi za blagovne znamke v Evropski uniji izdali skupno sporočilo o izvajanju sodbe v zadevi IP Translator.
According to that Communication, the Office interprets the scope of protection of national marks containing class headings as follows:
Urad v skladu z navedenim sporočilom razlaga obseg varstva nacionalnih znamk, ki vključujejo naslove razredov, kot sledi:
Earlier national trade marks filed before the IP Translator judgment: in principle, the Office accepts the filing practice of all national trade mark offices in the European Union.
Prejšnje nacionalne blagovne znamke, vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator: Urad načeloma sprejema prakso vlaganja prijav vseh nacionalnih uradov za blagovne znamke v Evropski uniji.
National trade marks filed before the IP Translator judgment have the scope of protection awarded by the national office(s) concerned.
Nacionalne blagovne znamke, za katere so bile prijave vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator, imajo obseg varstva, ki (so) jim ga je dodelil(-) zadevni nacionalni urad(-i).
The majority of the national offices interpret the class headings of their marks literally.
Večina nacionalnih uradov razlaga naslove razredov svojih znamk dobesedno.
For those marks, the Office also interprets the class headings on the basis of the natural and usual meaning of each general indication.
Tudi Urad naslove razredov za navedene znamke razlaga na podlagi naravnega in običajnega pomena posamezne splošne označbe.
Only eight national trade mark offices do not interpret the class headings of their own marks filed before the IP Translator judgment on the basis of their natural and usual meaning: Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Romania and Finland (see Table 1 of the Common Communication).
Samo osem nacionalnih uradov za znamke naslovov razredov svojih znamk, za katere so bile prijave vložene pred objavo sodbe v zadevi IP Translator, ne razlaga na podlagi njihovega naravnega in običajnega pomena: Bolgarija, Finska, Grčija, Italija, Latvija, Madžarska, Malta in Romunija (glej preglednico 1 skupnega sporočila).
The Office interprets those national marks as covering the class headings plus the alphabetical list of the Nice edition at the time of filing (even if the national office interprets the class heading as covering all goods and services in the class).
Urad navedene nacionalne znamke razlaga kot znamke, ki vključujejo naslove razredov in abecedni seznam izdaje Nicejske klasifikacije, kot je veljala ob vložitvi prijave (tudi če nacionalni Urad razlaga, da naslov razreda zajema vse blago in storitve iz razreda).
Earlier national marks filed after the IP Translator judgment: the Office interprets all goods and services covered by the national marks on the basis of their natural and usual meaning (see Table 5 of the Common Communication).
Prejšnje nacionalne znamke, vložene po objavi sodbe v zadevi IP Translator: Urad vse blago in storitve, ki so zajeti z nacionalnimi znamkami, razlaga na podlagi njihovega naravnega in običajnega pomena (glej preglednico 5 skupnega sporočila).
In order to determine the scope of protection the abovementioned principles have to be applied.
Obseg varstva je treba določiti v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi načeli.
Only those goods or services deemed to be covered following these principles will be considered when comparing the goods/services.
Pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev bo treba upoštevati samo blago ali storitve, za katere se šteje, da so zajete v skladu z navedenimi načeli.
3 Similarity of Goods and Services
Podobnost blaga in storitev
3.1 General principles
Splošna načela
3.1.1 Similarity factors
Dejavniki podobnosti
Generally speaking, two items are defined as being similar when they have some characteristics in common.
Na splošno velja, da sta dve vrsti blaga ali storitev opredeljeni kot podobni, če imata nekaj skupnih značilnosti.
The similarity of goods and services does not depend on any specific number of criteria that could be determined in advance and applied in all cases.
Podobnost blaga in storitev ni odvisna od konkretnega števila meril, ki bi jih bilo mogoče opredeliti vnaprej in uporabljati v vseh primerih.
The similarity of goods and services has been addressed in the case-law of the Court of Justice in Canon (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442).
Podobnost blaga in storitev je bila v sodni praksi Sodišča obravnavana v zadevi Canon (29/09/1998, C39/97, Canon, EU:C:1998:442).
The Court of Justice held that in assessing the similarity of goods all the relevant factors relating to those goods themselves should be taken into account.
Sodišče je odločilo, da je treba pri presoji podobnosti blaga upoštevati vse upoštevne dejavnike, ki se nanašajo na zadevno blago.
Those factors include, inter alia, their nature, their end users [should read ‘intended purpose'], their method of use and whether they are in competition with each other or are complementary (para. 23).
Ti dejavniki med drugim vključujejo njegovo naravo, njegove končne uporabnike (kar je treba razumeti kot „predvideni namen“), njegov način uporabe in navedbo, ali je med seboj konkurenčno ali pa se dopolnjuje (točka 23).
The term inter alia shows that the enumeration of the above factors by the Court is only indicative.
Izraz med drugim kaže, da je seznam zgornjih dejavnikov, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, samo okviren.
There may be other factors in addition to or instead of those mentioned by the Court that may be pertinent, depending on the particular case.
Poleg dejavnikov, ki jih je navedlo Sodišče, in namesto njih morda obstajajo drugi dejavniki, ki so morda pomembni, odvisno od konkretnega primera.
This leads to the conclusion that the following factors should be taken into account:
Iz tega je mogoče sklepati, da bi bilo treba upoštevati naslednje dejavnike:
Canon factors
Dejavnik v zadevi Canon:
nature
narava
intended purpose
predvideni namen
complementarity
dopolnjevanje
competition.
medsebojna konkurenčnost
Additional factors
Dodatni dejavniki:
distribution channels
distribucijske poti
relevant public
upoštevna javnost
the usual origin of the goods/services.
običajni izvor blaga ali storitev
These factors will be further explained in paragraph 3.2 below; they are also used in the Office's database on the comparison of goods and services.
Ti dejavniki bodo dodatno pojasnjeni v odstavku 3.2 v nadaljevanju, uporabljajo se tudi v podatkovni zbirki Urada za primerjavo blaga in storitev.
It should be noted, however, that even though the database is restricted to these eight factors, there might be specific cases where other criteria are relevant.
Poudariti je treba, da lahko obstajajo posebni primeri, v katerih so ustrezna druga merila, kljub temu da je podatkovna zbirka omejena na teh osem dejavnikov.
3.1.2 Defining relevant factors
Opredelitev upoštevnih dejavnikov
The comparison should focus on identifying the relevant factors that specifically characterise the goods/services to be compared.
Pri primerjavi se je treba osredotočiti na opredelitev upoštevnih dejavnikov, posebej značilnih za blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo.
Therefore, the relevance of a particular factor depends on the respective goods/services to be compared.
Zato je ustreznost nekega dejavnika odvisna le od nasprotujočega si blaga/storitev.
When comparing skis and ski-boots, it is evident that they do not coincide in their nature or method of use and are not in competition.
Pri primerjavi smuči in smučarskih čevljev je očitno, da se ne ujemajo po svoji naravi ali načinu uporabe ter da si med seboj niso konkurenčni.
Therefore, the comparison should focus on their purpose, their complementary character, their distribution channels, their usual origin and/or the relevant public.
Pri primerjavi bi se bilo treba torej osredotočiti na njihov namen, dopolnjevalni značaj, distribucijske poti, običajni izvor in/ali upoštevno javnost.
Therefore, the relevant factors and features characterising a product or a service may be different depending on the goods and services with which they have to be compared.
Zato so lahko upoštevni dejavniki in značilnosti proizvoda ali storitve različni, odvisno od blaga in storitev, s katerimi jih je treba primerjati.
The following questions could be asked:
Postaviti je mogoče naslednja vprašanja:
How will the goods/services be used?
Kako se bodo blago ali storitve uporabljale?
What is their purpose?
Kaj je njihov namen?
How likely is it that they coincide in producers?
Kako verjetno je, da imajo istega proizvajalca?
Are they usually found in the same outlet or department store, or in the same section of a supermarket?
Ali so običajno na voljo v isti trgovini ali veleblagovnici ali na istem oddelku supermarketa?
If the factors cannot already be defined from the wording of the goods/services, information may be derived from dictionary entries.
Če dejavnikov ni mogoče opredeliti že iz besedila blaga ali storitev, je mogoče informacije poiskati v slovarskih geslih.
However, dictionary entries have to be analysed against commercial realities and in particular taking into account the Nice Classification.
Vendar je treba slovarska gesla analizirati glede na poslovno stvarnost in zlasti ob upoštevanju Nicejske klasifikacije.
According to the dictionary, ice is the singular of ices and means inter alia ‘(an) ice cream' or ‘water ice' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition).
Po slovarju je angleška beseda ice (led) edninska oblika besede ices in med drugim pomeni „ice cream“ (sladoled) ali „water ice“ (vodni led) (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
If the comparison of ices and ice in Class 30 were made on the basis of the definition from the dictionary alone, it would lead to the erroneous conclusion that ice is identical to ices.
Če bi besedi ices in ice iz razreda 30 primerjali samo na podlagi slovarske opredelitve, bi to privedlo do napačne ugotovitve, da je ice enako ices.
However, since both ices and ice are mentioned in the list of goods in Class 30, ices are to be understood as ‘edible ices', whereas ice is to be understood as ‘cooling ice'.
Ker pa sta obe besedi, ices in ice, navedeni v seznamu blaga iz razreda 30, je treba ices razumeti „kot sladoled“, ice pa je treba razumeti „kot led“.
Although they coincide in the composition to the extent that both consist (partly) of frozen water, their commercial nature is different: while one is a foodstuff, the other is an auxiliary good for preserving and/or cooling foodstuffs.
Čeprav se ujemata v sestavi, saj oba (delno) sestavlja zmrznjena voda, je njuna poslovna narava različna: eden je živilo, drugi pa je drugi pomožno blago za podaljšanje trajnosti in/ali hlajenje živil.
This shows that the Nice Classification, in conjunction with the commercial perspective, prevails over the dictionary definition.
To kaže, da Nicejska klasifikacija v povezavi s poslovnim vidikom prevlada nad slovarsko opredelitvijo.
Once the relevant factors have been identified, the examiner must determine the relation between and the weight attributed to the relevant factors (see paragraph 3.3 below).
Preizkuševalec mora po opredelitvi upoštevnih dejavnikov določiti povezavo med njimi in njihovo težo, ki se jim pripisuje (glej odstavek 3.3 v nadaljevanju).
3.2 The specific similarity factors
Posebni dejavniki podobnosti
The following paragraphs define and illustrate the various factors for similarity of goods and services.
V naslednjih odstavkih so opredeljeni in ponazorjeni različni dejavniki podobnosti blaga in storitev.
3.2.1 Nature
Narava
The nature of a product/service can be defined as the essential qualities or characteristics by which this product/service is recognised.
Naravo proizvoda ali storitve je mogoče opredeliti kot bistvene lastnosti ali značilnosti, po katerih je ta proizvod ali storitev mogoče prepoznati.
Nature often corresponds to the particular type or sort of product/service or the specific category to which this product/service belongs and which is usually used to define it.
Narava pogosto ustreza določenemu tipu ali vrsti proizvoda ali storitve ali posebni kategoriji, v katero ta proizvod ali storitev spada in ki se običajno uporablja za njegovo ali njeno opredelitev.
In other words, it is the answer to the question ‘What is it?'
Z drugimi besedami, to je odgovor na vprašanje: „Kaj je to?
Car is a vehicle;
Avtomobil je vozilo.
Body lotion is a cosmetic product.
Losjon za telo je kozmetično sredstvo.
3.2.1.1 Indicative value of class headings and categories
Okvirna vrednost naslovov razredov in kategorij
The fact that goods/services to be compared fall under the same general indication of a class heading or broad category does not automatically mean that they are of the same nature.
Dejstvo, da blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, spadajo pod isto splošno označbo naslova razreda ali v širšo kategorijo, ne pomeni samodejno, da so enake narave.
An example of such a broad category is foodstuffs for human consumption.
Primer takšne širše kategorije so živila za človeško prehrano.
Fresh fruit (Class 31) on the one hand and coffee, flour, and bread (Class 30) on the other hand are of a different nature despite being foodstuffs.
Sveže sadje (razred 31) na eni strani ter kava, moka in kruh (razred 30) na drugi imajo različno naravo, kljub temu da so živila.
This slight connection, namely all being foodstuffs, does not preclude that their nature is different.
Ta šibka povezava, saj vse navedeno spada pod živila, ne izključuje možnosti, da je njihova narava različna.
The fact that goods/services to be compared fall under a sufficiently narrow general indication of a class heading favours an identical or similar nature.
Dejstvo, da blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, spadajo pod dovolj ozko splošno označbo naslova razreda, daje prednost enaki ali podobni naravi.
Condensed milk and cheese (both in Class 29) share the same nature because they belong to the same product category, namely milk products, which are a subcategory of foodstuffs (4/11/2003, T85/02, Castillo, EU:T:2003:288, § 33).
Kondenzirano mleko in sir (oba iz razreda 29) imata enako naravo, saj spadata v isto družino izdelkov, in sicer med mlečne izdelke, ki so podkategorija živil (4/11/2003, T85/02, Castillo, EU:T:2003:288, § 33).
3.2.1.2 Features of the goods defining their nature
Lastnosti blaga, ki opredeljujejo njegovo naravo
A variety of features of the goods in question may be useful for defining their nature.
Za opredelitev narave zadevnega blaga je mogoče uporabiti njegove različne lastnosti.
These include the following:
Te so med drugim:
Composition: for example, ingredients, materials of which the goods are made.
Sestava: na primer sestavine in materiali, iz katerih je narejeno blago.
Yoghurt (Class 29) is a milk product (the nature of yoghurt may be defined by its basic ingredient).
Jogurt (razred 29) je mlečni izdelek (naravo jogurta je mogoče opredeliti z njegovo osnovno sestavino).
Composition may be the most relevant criterion for defining nature.
Sestava je morda najustreznejše merilo za opredelitev narave.
However, an identical or similar composition of the goods is not per se an indicator of the same nature.
Vendar enaka ali podobna sestava blaga sama po sebi ne kaže enake narave.
A chair (Class 20) and a doll (Class 28) can both be made of plastic, but they are not of the same nature since one is a piece of furniture and the other is a toy.
Stol (razred 20) in punčka (igrača) (razred 28) sta lahko oba narejena iz plastike, vendar nista enake narave, saj je prvi proizvod kos pohištva, drugi pa igrača.
They belong to different categories.
Zato spadata v različni kategoriji.
Functioning principle: for example, mechanical functioning, with or without engine/motor; optical, electrical, biological, or chemical functioning.
Načelo delovanja: na primer mehansko delovanje, z motorjem ali brez njega; optično, električno, biološko ali kemično delovanje.
Telescope (Class 9) is an optical device (the nature of a telescope may be defined by its functioning principle, which is optical).
Teleskop (razred 9) je optična naprava (naravo teleskopa je mogoče opredeliti z njegovim načelom delovanja, ki je optično).
Although the functioning principle may help to define the nature of some goods, it is not always conclusive.
Čeprav si je mogoče z načelom delovanja pomagati pri opredelitvi narave nekaterega blaga, pa to načelo ni vedno odločilno.
There are cases where goods, in particular technology-related ones, with the same functioning principle are of a different nature.
Obstajajo primeri, v katerih ima blago, zlasti s področja tehnologije, enako načelo delovanja in drugačno naravo.
A blender and an electric toothbrush have the same functioning principle of rotation, but they are not of the same nature.
Mešalnik in električna zobna ščetka imata enako načelo delovanja, tj. vrtenje, vendar nimata enake narave.
In contrast, there are goods with different functioning principles but the same nature.
Nasprotno pa obstaja blago z različnimi načeli delovanja, vendar enako naravo.
The functioning principle of washing machines using washing powder is chemical, which is not the same as the functioning principle of washing machines using magnetic waves.
Načelo delovanja pralnih strojev, ki uporabljajo pralni prašek, je kemično in ni enako načelu delovanja pralnih strojev, ki uporabljajo magnetne valove.
However, these goods are of the same nature as they are both washing machines.
Vendar sta ta proizvoda enake narave, saj sta oba pralna stroja.
Physical condition: for example, liquid/solid, hard/soft, flexible/rigid.
Fizikalno stanje: na primer tekoče/trdno, trdo/mehko, prožno/togo.