natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
the request has to be signed;
prošnja mora biti podpisana,
the original time limit must not have expired already;
prvotni rok se še ni iztekel,
the language regime must be respected (i.e. if the request is not in the language of the proceedings, a translation must be submitted within 1 month of filing; otherwise the request will not be taken into account).
upoštevati je treba jezikovno ureditev (tj. če prošnja ni v jeziku postopka, je treba v enem mesecu od vložitve predložiti prevod, sicer se prošnja ne bo upoštevala).
An extension will only be possible if the relevant request is filed and received before the expiry of the original term (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60).
Podaljšanje bo mogoče samo, če je zadevna prošnja vložena in prejeta pred iztekom prvotnega roka (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60).
If a request for extension is received by the Office after the expiry of the time limit, it must be rejected.
Če Urad prošnjo za podaljšanje prejme po izteku roka, jo mora zavrniti.
As a general rule, the first request for an extension that is received in time will be considered appropriate and will be granted for a period of 2 months (or less, if so requested).
Načeloma se za prvo pravočasno prispelo prošnjo, ki se šteje za ustrezno, odobri podaljšanje za obdobje dveh mesecev (ali manj, če je tako zahtevano).
However, any subsequent request for an extension of the same time limit will be refused, unless the party requesting it duly explains and justifies the exceptional circumstances that prevented it from meeting the original time limit and the first extension, and why a further extension is necessary.
Vendar se vsaka poznejša prošnja za podaljšanje istega roka zavrne, razen če stranka, ki zaprosi za podaljšanje, ustrezno pojasni in utemelji izjemne okoliščine, ki so ji preprečile izpolniti prvotni rok in njegovo prvo podaljšanje, ter navede razloge, zakaj je potrebno nadaljnje podaljšanje.
General or vague explanations will not justify a second extension.
Splošna ali nejasna pojasnila ne bodo zadostovala za drugo podaljšanje.
The request must always be accompanied by evidence and/or supporting documentation.
Prošnji morajo biti vedno priloženi dokazi in/ali spremna dokumentacija.
On the other hand, circumstances that are within the control of the party concerned are not ‘exceptional circumstances'.
Po drugi strani okoliščine, ki so pod nadzorom zadevne stranke, niso izjemne okoliščine.
For example, last-minute discussions with the other party are not ‘exceptional circumstances'.
Na primer, pogovori z drugo stranko v zadnjem trenutku niso izjemne okoliščine.
They are within the control of the parties.
Stranki imata nadzor nad njimi.
The request has to be filed by the party affected by the time limit.
Prošnjo mora vložiti stranka, na katero rok vpliva.
For example, if the applicant has to submit observations in reply to the notice of opposition, it can only be the applicant that asks for an extension.
Na primer, če mora prijavitelj predložiti pripombe v odgovor na ugovor, lahko za podaljšanje zaprosi le on.
For more information on extensions of time limits, consult the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits, paragraph 3.1.3.
Za več informacij o podaljšanjih rokov glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki, odstavek 3.1.3.
6.2.1.3 Extension of a time limit by the Office on its own initiative
Podaljšanje roka na lastno pobudo Urada
The Office can extend a time limit on its own initiative, if and when particular reasons make it necessary.
Urad lahko podaljša rok na svojo pobudo, če in kadar je to potrebno iz posebnih razlogov.
For example, a request to extend a time limit without any justification is received by the Office 20 days before the end of the time limit to file observations but is not dealt with until after expiry of the time limit.
Na primer, Urad 20 dni pred iztekom roka za predložitev pripomb prejme prošnjo za podaljšanje roka brez utemeljitve, vendar jo obravnava šele po izteku tega roka.
Because refusal of the request after expiry of the time limit will disproportionately harm the interests of the party who requested the extension, the Office extends the time limit by the number of days that were left when the party submitted its request, in this case 20 days.
Ker bo zavrnitev prošnje po izteku roka nesorazmerno škodovala interesom stranke, ki je zaprosila za podaljšanje, Urad podaljša rok za število dni, ki je preostalo do izteka roka, ko je stranka predložila svojo prošnjo, v tem primeru za 20 dni.
This practice is based on the rules of fair administration.
Ta praksa temelji na pravilih dobrega upravljanja.
Where a request for extension of an extendable time limit is filed and received before expiry of the time limit (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60), the party concerned will be granted at least 1 day, even if the request for extension arrived on the last day of this time limit.
Če je bila prošnja za podaljšanje roka, ki ga je mogoče podaljšati, vložena in prejeta pred iztekom tega roka (30/01/2014, C324/13 P, Patrizia Rocha, EU:C:2014:60), se zadevni stranki odobri podaljšanje za vsaj en dan, tudi če je prošnja za podaljšanje prispela zadnji dan tega roka.
6.2.1.4 Signature
Podpis
A joint request has to be signed by both parties and has to be received within the time limit for which an extension is requested.
Skupno prošnjo morata podpisati obe stranki, prispeti pa mora v roku, za katerega se zahteva podaljšanje.
A request signed by one of the representatives, assuring the Office that the other party agrees to the extension, is not acceptable.
Prošnja, ki jo podpiše eden od zastopnikov, ki Uradu zagotavlja, da se druga stranka strinja s podaljšanjem, ni sprejemljiva.
For joint requests submitted in one single submission by electronic means, the indication of the name of the sender is deemed to be equivalent to its signature; however, the signature of the other party must be present in order for the request to be acceptable.
Za skupne prošnje, predložene elektronsko v okviru iste predložitve, se navedba imena pošiljatelja šteje za enakovredno njegovemu podpisu; da pa je prošnja sprejemljiva, je treba predložiti podpis druge stranke.
6.3 Suspension
Začasna ustavitev
Article 9(4) and Article 71 EUTMDR
Člen 9(4) in člen 71 Delegirane uredbe
The Office can suspend opposition proceedings either ex officio or at the request of either one or both parties.
Urad lahko po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo obeh strank ali ene od njiju začasno ustavi postopek ugovora.
6.3.1 Suspension requested by both parties
Začasna ustavitev na zahtevo obeh strank
According to Article 71(2) EUTMDR, if both parties request suspension after expiry of the cooling-off period, upon a reasoned request (for example, negotiations towards a friendly settlement), the suspension is granted.
V skladu s členom 71(2) Delegirane uredbe se začasna ustavitev odobri na zahtevo obeh strank po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, in sicer mora biti ta zahteva utemeljena (npr. pogajanja o sporazumni rešitvi).
In this case, and regardless of the period requested by the parties, the first suspension will be granted for a period of 6 months, with the parties being given the possibility of opting out.
V takšnem primeru in ne glede na obdobje, ki ga zahtevata stranki, bo prva začasna ustavitev postopka odobrena za šest mesecev, pri čemer bosta lahko stranki končali to obdobje.
The process for opting out is the same as for the extension of the cooling-off period: if one party opts out, the suspension will end 14 days after the parties have been informed thereof.
Postopek za končanje tega obdobja je enak kot za podaljšanje obdobja za pobotanje: če ena od strank konča to obdobje, začasna ustavitev postopka preneha 14 dni po tem, ko sta stranki o tem obveščeni.
The proceedings will resume the day after, and the party whose time limit was pending at the moment of suspension will be granted a time limit of 2 months.
Postopek se bo znova nadaljeval naslednji dan, stranki, katere rok je miroval ob začasni ustavitvi, pa bo odobren dvomesečni rok.
It is not possible to opt out during the last month of the suspended period, and any requests to do so will be rejected.
Iz postopka ni mogoče izstopiti v zadnjem mesecu začasno ustavljenega postopka, vse zahteve za izstop iz postopka pa bodo zavrnjene.
A joint request for suspension will not be granted if it is received within the cooling-off period, because the purpose of the cooling-off period is to set a time frame for negotiations before the adversarial stage begins.
Skupna zahteva za začasno ustavitev ne bo odobrena, če je prejeta v obdobju za pobotanje, saj je namen tega obdobja določiti časovni okvir za pogajanja pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
In principle, the parties may obtain extensions of the suspension by jointly filing a reasoned request (for example indicating that the negotiations towards a friendly settlement are ongoing).
Strankama se lahko načeloma odobrijo podaljšanja začasne ustavitve, če skupaj vložita utemeljeno zahtevo (v kateri na primer navedeta, da potekajo pogajanja za sporazumno rešitev).
Such requests will be granted for further 6-month periods.
Takšne zahteve bodo odobrene za nadaljnja šestmesečna obdobja.
However, the maximum duration of this suspension of the proceedings is limited to 2 years, as set out in Article 71(2) EUTMDR - a duration that is to be understood as 2 years cumulative over the course of the proceedings.
Kot pa je določeno v členu 71(2) Delegirane uredbe, je ta začasna ustavitev postopka omejena na največ dve leti, pri čemer se razume, da je to obdobje skupno dve leti med postopkom.
Consequently, requests for suspension submitted by both parties must be rejected if the suspended period exceeds the maximum of 2 years as a whole.
Zato je treba zahteve za začasno ustavitev na podlagi pogajanj v teku ustaviti, če obdobje začasne ustavitve skupaj presega dve leti.
Requests for suspension based on ongoing negotiations submitted by only one of the parties will be rejected.
Zahteve za začasno ustavitev na podlagi pogajanj v teku, ki jih predloži le ena od strank, bodo zavrnjene.
6.3.2 Suspensions by the Office ex officio or at the request of one of the parties
Urad postopek začasno ustavi po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo ene od strank
The Office may suspend the opposition proceedings ex officio or at the request of one party under a variety of circumstances:
Urad lahko začasno ustavi postopek ugovora po uradni dolžnosti ali na zahtevo ene od strank v različnih okoliščinah:
the opposition is based on an application for registration of a trade mark (including conversion);
ugovor temelji na prijavi za registracijo blagovne znamke (vključno s konverzijo),
the opposition is based on an application for registration of a geographical indication or designation of origin.
ugovor temelji na prijavi za registracijo geografske označbe ali označbe porekla,
the earlier right is at risk (under opposition or cancellation);
prejšnja pravica je ogrožena (v postopku ugovora ali izbrisa),
there are third-party observations that raise serious doubts as to the registrability of the EUTM application (see paragraph 4.6 above);
pripombe tretjih oseb vzbujajo resne dvome glede možnosti registracije prijave blagovne znamke EU (glej odstavek 4.6 zgoraj),
there are errors in the publication of the contested application that require the mark to be republished;
v objavi izpodbijane prijave so napake, zaradi katerih je treba znamko znova objaviti,
a transfer is pending on earlier EUTMs/EUTM applications or contested EUTM applications.
v teku je prenos v zvezi s prejšnjimi blagovnimi znamkami EU/prijavami blagovne znamke EU ali izpodbijanimi prijavami blagovne znamke EU.
It should be noted that there is no obligation in any of the abovementioned cases to suspend the proceedings.
Treba je upoštevati, da v nobenem od zgoraj navedenih primerov ni treba začasno ustaviti postopka.
The Office will decide whether suspension is appropriate under the circumstances of each case.
Urad se bo na podlagi okoliščin posamezne zadeve odločil, ali je ustrezna začasna ustavitev postopka.
Therefore, the decision is at the Office's discretion.
Odločitev zato Urad sprejme po svoji presoji.
Note that the proceedings may be suspended for a period of time longer than the one set out in Article 71(2) EUTMDR where the conditions indicated in Article 71(1)(a) or (b) EUTMDR are complied with.
Treba je upoštevati, da se postopek lahko začasno ustavi za daljše obdobje, kot je določeno v členu 71(2) Delegirane uredbe, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 71(1)(a) ali (b) Delegirane uredbe.
6.3.2.1 Explanation of the basic principle, timing of suspension
Pojasnilo osnovnega načela, trenutek začasne ustavitve
Article 71(1)(a) and (b) EUTMDR
Člen 71(1)(a) in (b) Delegirane uredbe
In principle, oppositions based on (i) applications or (ii) earlier rights that are at risk are not to be suspended ex officio at the very beginning of the proceedings.
Načeloma se postopki ugovorov, ki temeljijo na (i) prijavah ali (ii) prejšnjih pravicah, na začetku postopka ne bi smeli začasno ustaviti po uradni dolžnosti.
The assumption is that in most cases applications mature into registrations, and oppositions or cancellation actions against earlier rights might be solved during the proceedings.
Domneva se, da prijave v večini primerov že med postopkom privedejo do registracije, ugovori v zvezi s prejšnjimi pravicami ali njihovi izbrisi pa se lahko rešijo med postopkom.
In these cases the opposition proceeds until a decision is ready to be taken.
V teh primerih se ugovor nadaljuje, dokler ni pripravljena odločitev, ki bo sprejeta.
Consideration must then be given as to whether the earlier right in question could make a difference, in a prima facie opinion, to the outcome of the opposition.
Zato je treba upoštevati, ali bi zadevna prejšnja pravica na prvi pogled lahko vplivala na izid ugovora.
If the opposition is deemed to be successful or rejected anyway, regardless of the fate of the earlier right at risk, the proceedings should not be suspended.
Če se za ugovor šteje, da bo vsekakor uspešen ali zavrnjen, ne glede na usodo ogrožene prejšnje pravice, postopka ni treba začasno ustaviti.
If, in contrast, the earlier right at risk must necessarily be taken into account in the decision on the opposition, the proceedings will be suspended and, in the case of a national application or an earlier national mark at risk, the opponent must be requested to provide information on the status of the application or registration.
Če pa je treba po drugi strani ogroženo prejšnjo pravico nujno upoštevati v odločbi o ugovoru, bo postopek začasno ustavljen, pri čemer je treba od vložnika ugovora v primeru nacionalne prijave ali ogrožene prejšnje pravice zahtevati, naj predloži informacije o statusu prijave ali registracije.
For earlier EUTMs, the Office has this information at its disposal.
Urad ima na voljo te informacije za prejšnje blagovne znamke EU.
However, the Office may suspend the proceedings earlier if this is requested by one of the parties and the earlier right is an application or is at risk.
Vendar lahko Urad začasno ustavi postopek pred tem, in sicer če to zahteva ena od strank oziroma če je prejšnja pravica prijava ali je ogrožena.
If the earlier right is a national one, the parties must submit evidence that it is facing problems.
Če je prejšnja pravica nacionalna, morata stranki predložiti dokaze, da se v zvezi z njo pojavljajo težave.
In this case the outcome of the proceedings against the earlier mark must have some impact on the opposition.
V takšnem primeru mora imeti izid postopka zoper prejšnjo znamko določen vpliv na ugovor.
Therefore, the probable outcome of the opposition will be considered in order to decide on suspension - in particular, whether the final decision on the opposition cannot be issued without taking into account the earlier application or earlier registration.
Zato bo pri sprejemanju odločitve o začasni ustavitvi upoštevan verjetni izid ugovora, zlasti, ali končne odločbe o ugovoru ni mogoče izdati brez upoštevanja prejšnje prijave ali prejšnje registracije.
This will be the case if the circumstances of the case do not allow the Office to say that the opposition will be rejected (e.g. because there is no likelihood of confusion) or upheld (because there are other earlier rights that are sufficient to reject the contested mark for all the contested goods and services).
To velja, če Urad zaradi okoliščin primera ne more navesti, da bo ugovor zavrnjen (npr. ker ni verjetnosti zmede) ali potrjen (ker obstajajo druge prejšnje pravice, ki zadostujejo za zavrnitev izpodbijane znamke za vse izpodbijano blago in storitve).
When an opposition is based on an application for registration, it may be appropriate to suspend the opposition proceedings under Article 71(1)(a) EUTMDR to await registration of the opponent's earlier mark.
Kadar ugovor temelji na prijavi za registracijo, bo morda ustrezno začasno ustaviti postopek ugovora na podlagi člena 71(1) Delegirane uredbe in počakati na registracijo prejšnje znamke vložnika ugovora.
However, if an opposition is to be rejected, either for formal or for substantive reasons, a suspension would be meaningless and would simply prolong the proceedings unnecessarily.
Vendar če je treba ugovor zavrniti bodisi iz formalnih bodisi iz vsebinskih razlogov, bi bila začasna ustavitev nesmiselna in bi le po nepotrebnem podaljšala postopek.
When there are no other earlier rights to take into account (because there are no other earlier rights or they were not substantiated) or when the application or registration must nevertheless be taken into account (because the other earlier rights are not ‘winners'), an assessment must be made of whether the opposition will be successful on the basis of the application, in order to decide on the suspension.
Kadar ni drugih prejšnjih pravic, ki bi se upoštevale (ker druge prejšnje pravice ne obstajajo ali niso bile utemeljene), ali kadar je treba prijavo ali registracijo kljub temu upoštevati (ker druge prejšnje pravice ne zagotavljajo uspeha ugovora), je treba za odločitev o začasni ustavitvi presoditi, ali bo ugovor uspešen na podlagi prijave.
Proceedings will only be suspended if it is found that the earlier application, if registered, will lead to the total or partial rejection of the contested EUTM application.
Postopek bo začasno ustavljen samo, če se ugotovi, da bo prejšnja prijava, če bo registrirana, privedla do celotne ali delne zavrnitve izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU.
6.3.2.2 Earlier EUTM applications or registrations
Prejšnje prijave ali registracije blagovne znamke EU
In this case, the opposition is based on an application but is not suspended because there is another earlier right (a registered trade mark) on the basis of which the contested application may be rejected.
V tem primeru ugovor temelji na prijavi, vendar se postopek začasno ne ustavi, ker obstaja še ena prejšnja pravica (registrirana blagovna znamka), na podlagi katere se lahko izpodbijana prijava zavrne.
If the opponent fails to substantiate this other earlier right, the earlier application becomes crucial for the decision.
Če vložnik ugovora ne utemelji te druge prejšnje pravice, prejšnja prijava postane bistvena za odločitev.
If, according to the records, the only earlier application or registration is facing problems, the opposition should be suspended.
Če se glede na evidenco v zvezi z edino prejšnjo prijavo ali registracijo pojavljajo težave, je treba postopek ugovora začasno ustaviti.
6.3.2.3 Earlier national/international marks (applications or registrations/rights)
Prejšnje nacionalne/mednarodne znamke (prijave ali registracije/pravice)
In this case, the issue of suspension will have to be raised by the parties (normally the applicant) and evidence will have to be submitted that the earlier mark (application or registration/right) is facing problems.
V tem primeru morata vprašanje začasne ustavitve postaviti stranki (običajno prijavitelj) in treba je predložiti dokaze, da se v zvezi s prejšnjo znamko (prijavo ali registracijo/pravico) pojavljajo težave.
This evidence must be official, it must clearly identify the proceedings leading to the suspension, and it must indicate the relief sought.
Ti dokazi morajo biti uradni, v njih pa morata biti jasno opredeljen postopek, ki vodi do začasne ustavitve, in naveden zahtevani ukrep.
In particular, the evidence must be clear as to the possible consequences for the earlier right on which the opposition is based.
Zlasti morajo biti dokazi jasni glede morebitnih posledic za prejšnjo pravico, na kateri temelji ugovor.
If necessary, the party concerned may be requested to submit a translation of the evidence.
Po potrebi se lahko od zadevne stranke zahteva, naj predloži prevod dokazov.
Upon such a request the Office will consider whether, under the circumstances of the case, it is advisable to suspend the proceedings.
Urad bo na podlagi takšne zahteve proučil, ali je glede na okoliščine zadeve priporočljivo postopek začasno ustaviti.
If no party raises the question of suspension, then the general principle applies and the Office only has to decide on suspension if the proceedings reach the end of the adversarial part and there is no information that the application has matured to registration or that national proceedings against the earlier mark have come to an end.
Če nobena od strank ne postavi vprašanja začasne ustavitve postopka, se uporablja splošno načelo in Urad mora o začasni ustavitvi odločiti samo, če se končuje kontradiktorni del postopka in ni informacij, da je prijava privedla do registracije ali da se je končal nacionalni postopek zoper prejšnjo znamko.
In this case the opponent should be required to inform the Office of the status of its earlier application or registration.
V takem primeru je treba vložnika ugovora pozvati, naj Urad obvesti o statusu svoje prejšnje prijave ali registracije.
6.3.2.4 Examples
Primeri
Here are some examples where, according to the general practice indicated above, the situation apparently does not require the proceedings to be suspended but they can be if the Office finds it appropriate.
Navedenih je nekaj primerov, v katerih začasna ustavitev postopka glede na zgoraj navedeno splošno prakso zaradi okoliščin na prvi pogled ni potrebna, vendar se lahko kljub temu odredi, če je po mnenju Urada ustrezna.
The opposition is based on a French mark and on an EUTM application, neither of which faces problems.
Ugovor temelji na francoski znamki in prijavi blagovne znamke EU, pri čemer se pri nobeni od njiju ne pojavljajo težave.
Both cover the same sign and the same goods, which are confusingly similar to the contested trade mark.
Obe se nanašata na isti znak in isto blago, ki sta tako podobna izpodbijani blagovni znamki, da to povzroča zmedo.
Therefore, the opposition may be dealt with on the basis of the French mark only.
Ugovor se torej lahko obravnava samo na podlagi francoske znamke.
The earlier application does not make any difference to the outcome, but the applicant requests a suspension.
Prejšnja prijava ne vpliva na izid, vendar prijavitelj zahteva začasno ustavitev.
If the earlier right is an EUTM application and the Office concludes that it is facing problems or, in the case of a national application, if the applicant submits evidence that the opponent's application is facing problems, the proceedings may be suspended.
Če je prejšnja pravica prijava blagovne znamke EU in Urad ugotovi, da se v zvezi z njo pojavljajo težave, ali če prijavitelj v primeru nacionalne prijave predloži dokaze, da se pri prijavi vložnika ugovora pojavljajo težave, se lahko postopek začasno ustavi.
The following examples fall into the category of earlier national marks facing problems:
V kategorijo prejšnjih nacionalnih znamk, pri katerih se pojavljajo težave, spadata naslednja primera:
the applicant (or a third party) has filed an action or a counterclaim seeking the invalidation or revocation of the earlier registration;
prijavitelj (ali tretja oseba) je vložil tožbo ali nasprotno tožbo, s katero zahteva ugotovitev ničnosti ali razveljavitev prejšnje registracije,