natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2.2 Correction of errors in notifications other than decisions 9
2.2 Popravljanje napak v obvestilih, ki niso odločbe 8
3 Correction of Technical Errors in Registering a Trade Mark or Publishing the Registration 9
3 Popravljanje tehničnih napak pri registraciji blagovne znamke ali objavi registracije 9
1 Revocation of Decisions and Cancellation of Entries in the Register
Razveljavitev odločb in izbris vpisov v register
Article 103 EUTMR
Člen 103 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 70 EUTMDR
Člen 70 Delegirane uredbe
Under certain conditions a decision taken by the Office can be revoked or an entry in the Register cancelled.
Pod določenimi pogoji je mogoče razveljaviti odločbo Urada ali izbrisati vpis v register.
This part of the Guidelines deals with the practical aspects of revocation/cancellation under Article 103 EUTMR; it does not apply to registered Community designs (RCDs).
Ta del Smernic obravnava praktične vidike razveljavitve ali izbrisa v skladu s členom 103 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ne uporablja pa se za registrirane modele Skupnosti.
The revocation procedure can be initiated either by a party to the proceedings or by the Office on its own motion.
Postopek razveljavitve lahko sproži bodisi stranka v postopku bodisi Urad po uradni dolžnosti.
A decision can only be revoked by another decision.
Odločba se lahko razveljavi le z drugo odločbo.
The same applies to cancellations of entries in the Register.
Enako velja za izbris vpisov v register.
1.1 Obvious errors attributable to the Office
Očitne napake, ki jih je mogoče pripisati Uradu
A decision must be revoked or an entry in the Register cancelled when it contains an obvious error attributable to the Office.
Odločbo je treba razveljaviti oziroma vpis v register izbrisati, če vsebuje očitno napako, ki jo je mogoče pripisati Uradu.
The wording ‘obvious error' covers substantial procedural violations and the obvious distortion of facts.
Pojem „očitna napaka“ zajema bistvene kršitve postopka in očitno izkrivljanje dejstev.
It does not contain errors of substance, where no revocation is possible.
Ne zajema vsebinskih napak, pri katerih razveljavitev ni mogoča.
A decision/entry contains an obvious error where there has been an error in the proceedings (usually when an essential procedural step was omitted) or where the decision/entry ignores a procedural action taken by the parties.
Odločba ali vpis vsebuje očitno napako, kadar je napaka nastala v postopku (po navadi, kadar se izpusti bistveni korak postopka) ali kadar odločba ali vpis ne upošteva postopkovnega dejanja, ki so ga stranke izvedle.
The decision/entry is incorrect if the procedure established by the Regulations has not been followed correctly.
Odločba ali vpis je nepravilen, če postopek, ki ga predpisujejo uredbe, ni bil pravilno izveden.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples of obvious errors requiring revocation.
V nadaljevanju je neizčrpen seznam primerov očitnih napak, zaradi katerih je potrebna razveljavitev.
The EUTM is registered despite having previously been withdrawn.
Blagovna znamka EU je registrirana, čeprav je bila predhodno umaknjena.
The opposition has been found admissible even though some admissibility requirements were not met (18/10/2012, C402/11 P, Redtube, EU:C:2012:649).
Ugovor se je štel za dopusten, čeprav ni izpolnjeval določenih zahtev glede dopustnosti (18/10/2012, C402/11 P, Redtube, EU:C:2012:649).
The EUTM is registered despite a deficiency in the payment of the application fees.
Blagovna znamka EU je registrirana kljub neplačilu pristojbin za prijavo.
The EUTM is registered despite a successful opposition.
Blagovna znamka EU je registrirana kljub uspešnemu ugovoru.
The EUTM's refusal on absolute grounds is notified before expiry of the time limit given to the applicant to send observations in reply to the objection, or ignoring the observations the applicant filed on time.
Zavrnitev blagovne znamke EU iz absolutnih razlogov se sporoči pred iztekom roka, ki ga ima prijavitelj za pošiljanje pripomb v odgovor na ugovor, ali ne upošteva pripomb, ki jih je prijavitelj vložil pravočasno.
(Where the applicant has responded within the time limit, the examiner can continue dealing with the application, for example by issuing a decision, and is not required to wait until expiry of the time limit set in the objection letter.)
(Če se prijavitelj odzove v roku, lahko preizkuševalec nadaljuje obravnavo prijave, tako da na primer izda odločbo, ne da bi moral čakati do izteka roka, določenega v dopisu o ugovoru.)
The EUTM is refused on absolute grounds, ignoring a valid request from the applicant for the opportunity to submit evidence of acquired distinctiveness (Article 7(3) EUTMR).
Blagovna znamka EU se zavrne iz absolutnih razlogov in brez upoštevanja utemeljene zahteve prijavitelja za možnost, da predloži dokaze o pridobljenem razlikovalnem učinku (člen 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The EUTM is refused on absolute grounds, ignoring the evidence of acquired distinctiveness duly submitted.
Blagovna znamka EU se zavrne iz absolutnih razlogov in brez upoštevanja ustrezno predloženih dokazov o pridobljenemu razlikovalnem učinku.
The EUTM is refused by the Opposition Division, ignoring an unprocessed request for proof of use or without dealing with the issue of proof of use.
Oddelek za ugovore zavrne blagovno znamko EU brez upoštevanja neobravnavane zahteve za dokaz o uporabi ali brez obravnavanja vprašanja dokaza o uporabi.
The EUTM is registered despite a pending opposition.
Blagovna znamka EU je registrirana kljub nerešenemu ugovoru.
The opposition is rejected on the basis of lack of proof of use but
Ugovor je zavrnjen na podlagi pomanjkljivih dokazov o uporabi, vendar:
○ the opponent was not expressly given a time limit for submitting proof of use;
rok za predložitev dokazov o uporabi za vložnika ugovora ni bil izrecno določen,
○ proof of use was filed on time and was overlooked.
je bil prezrt pravočasno vložen dokaz o uporabi.
The opposition decision was rendered while the proceedings were suspended or interrupted or, more generally, while a time limit for one of the parties was still running.
Odločba o ugovoru je bila izdana, ko je bil postopek začasno ustavljen ali prekinjen ali, splošneje, ko je še vedno tekel rok za eno od strank.
Any breach of the right to be heard (observations not forwarded to the other party when that party should have been given a time limit to reply pursuant to the Regulation or the Office's practice).
Katera koli kršitev pravice do zaslišanja (pripombe niso bile poslane drugi stranki, za katero bi moral biti določen rok za odgovor na podlagi uredbe ali prakse Urada).
When closing a file due to a limitation of the contested EUTM application or a withdrawal, the Office has issued a decision on costs, overlooking an agreement on costs between both parties that was on file at the time.
Ob zaprtju spisa zaradi omejitve izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU ali umika je Urad izdal odločbo o stroških ter pri tem prezrl dogovor o stroških med strankama, ki je bil takrat del spisa.
A transfer of ownership was entered in the Register despite insufficient evidence of the transfer.
V register je bil vpisan prenos lastništva kljub pomanjkljivim dokazom o prenosu.
Whether or not these errors were a result of human error or of the incorrect functioning of an IT tool is immaterial.
Ni pomembno, ali so bile te napake posledica človeške napake ali nepravilnega delovanja informacijskih orodij.
The effect of the revocation of a decision or of the cancellation of an entry in the Register is that the decision or entry is deemed never to have existed.
Učinek razveljavitve odločbe ali izbrisa vpisa v register je, da se za odločbo ali vpis šteje, da ni nikoli obstajal.
The file is returned to the procedural stage it was at before the erroneous decision or entry was made.
Spis se vrne v fazo postopka, v kateri je bil pred napačno odločbo ali vpisom.
1.2 Who decides on revocation/cancellation?
Kdo odloča o razveljavitvi ali izbrisu?
Decisions on revocation/cancellation are made by the department or unit that made the entry or took the decision, and can be appealed under Article 66(2) EUTMR.
Odločbe o razveljavitvi ali izbrisu sprejema oddelek ali enota, ki je opravila vpis ali sprejela odločbo, zoper njih se lahko v skladu s členom 66(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU vloži pritožba.
1.3 Procedural aspects
Postopkovni vidiki
1.3.1 Assessment
Presoja
The Office must verify, firstly, whether the decision or entry contains an obvious error; secondly, whether more than 1 year has passed since notification of the decision or entry in the Register; and, thirdly, whether there has been an appeal against the decision/entry in the Register.
Urad mora preveriti, prvič, ali odločba ali vpis vsebuje očitno napako, drugič, ali je od obvestila o odločbi ali vpisa v register minilo že več kot eno leto in, tretjič, ali je bila zoper odločbo ali vpis v register vložena pritožba.
Nature of the error.
Vrsta napake.
It must be verified whether the decision or entry contains an obvious error.
Preveriti je treba, ali odločba ali vpis vsebuje očitno napako.
For further information, see paragraph 1.1 above.
Za več informacij glej odstavek 1.1 zgoraj.
1 year.
Eno leto.
It must first be established whether more than 1 year has passed since notification of the decision or entry in the Register.
Najprej je treba ugotoviti, ali je od obvestila o odločbi ali vpisa v register minilo že več kot eno leto.
Article 103(2) EUTMR provides that revocation/cancellation must be effected within 1 year of the date on which the erroneous decision was taken or the erroneous entry was made in the Register, after consultation with the parties to the proceedings and any proprietor of rights to the EU trade mark in question that are entered in the Register.
Člen 103(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da je treba razveljavitev ali izbris po posvetovanju s strankami v postopku in imetniki pravic iz naslova zadevne blagovne znamke EU, vpisanih v register, opraviti v enem letu od datuma sprejetja napačne odločbe ali napačnega vpisa v register.
The revocation/cancellation is deemed ‘effected' on the date of notification of the decision on revocation/cancellation, regardless of any appeal.
Razveljavitev ali izbris se šteje „kot opravljen“ na datum obvestila o odločbi o razveljavitvi oziroma izbrisu, ne glede na morebitno pritožbo.
As revocation/cancellation is not possible after 1 year, any request for revocation/cancellation received after the time limit will be rejected as inadmissible.
Ker razveljavitev ali izbris po poteku enega leta ni mogoč, bodo vse zahteve za razveljavitev ali izbris, prejete po tem roku, zavrnjene kot nedopustne.
Furthermore, even if a request has been received within that time limit, any pending proceedings for revocation/cancellation will be terminated and the request rejected upon expiry of the 1-year period, irrespective of the reason why the proceedings for revocation/cancellation could not be concluded on time.
Tudi če je bila zahteva prejeta pred iztekom roka, bodo vsi tekoči postopki za razveljavitev ali izbris ob izteku enoletnega obdobja prekinjeni, zahteva pa zavrnjena, ne glede na razlog, zaradi katerega postopka za razveljavitev ali izbris ni bilo mogoče končati pravočasno.
In light of the fixed and equitable time limit, those adversely affected must inform the Office about the obvious error identified without any delay, particularly where an adverse party may be involved who needs to be consulted.
Glede na določen in pravičen rok morajo vsi, ki jih je napaka prizadela, o ugotovljeni očitni napaki nemudoma obvestiti Urad, zlasti če se je treba posvetovati z nasprotno stranko.
In any event, irrespective of the time remaining of the 1 year, the Office will always initiate the procedure for revocation/cancellation if it becomes aware of an obvious error to be corrected, and will do its utmost to conduct an expedient procedure to conclude on time.
Ne glede na preostali čas pred iztekom enoletnega roka bo Urad v vsakem primeru vedno začel postopek za razveljavitev ali izbris, če ugotovi očitno napako, ki jo je treba popraviti, in si bo po najboljših močeh prizadeval za ustrezno vodenje postopka, da bo ta končan pravočasno.
Decision/entry against which an appeal is pending.
Odločba ali vpis, zoper katerega je vložena pritožba.
An appeal filed against a decision containing an obvious error is not an obstacle to revocation.
Pritožba, vložena zoper odločbo, ki vsebuje očitno napako, ni ovira za njeno razveljavitev.
Article 103(4) EUTMR provides that the appeal proceedings will become devoid of purpose upon revocation of an erroneous decision.
Člen 103(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da pritožbeni postopki postanejo brezpredmetni, ko Urad razveljavi svojo napačno odločbo.
1.3.2 Distinction between where only one party and where more than one party is affected
Razlikovanje med napakami, ki vplivajo na le eno stranko, in napakami, ki vplivajo na več kot eno stranko
The procedure where only one party is affected is described in paragraph 1.3.2.1 below.
Postopek, kadar napaka vpliva na le eno stranko, je opisan v odstavku 1.3.2.1 v nadaljevanju.
Examples are when the Office duly receives third-party observations that raise doubts but the EUTM application is not blocked and continues to registration; and where an EUTM application is registered although the application fee has not been paid.
Takšna primera sta, kadar Urad prejme pripombe tretjih oseb, ki vsebujejo razlog za dvom, vendar ne ustavi prijave blagovne znamke EU ter nadaljuje registracijo, in kadar Urad prijavo blagovne znamke EU registrira, čeprav pristojbina za prijavo ni bila plačana.
Errors that concern incorrect handling of the files after a decision has been taken, for example where an EUTM application is registered despite having been refused on absolute grounds, affect only one party - the applicant.
Napake v zvezi z nepravilnim ravnanjem s spisi po že sprejeti odločbi, ko je na primer prijava blagovne znamke EU registrirana, čeprav je bila zavrnjena iz absolutnih razlogov, vplivajo samo na eno stranko - prijavitelja.
If revocation of a decision is likely to affect more than one party, the procedure described in paragraph 1.3.2.2 below must be followed.
Če je verjetno, da bo razveljavitev odločbe vplivala na več kot eno stranko, je treba upoštevati postopek, opisan v odstavku 1.3.2.2 v nadaljevanju.
For example, more than one party is affected by the revocation of a decision in opposition proceedings where the Office overlooked a request for proof of use.
Na primer, razveljavitev odločbe, ko Urad v postopku ugovora prezre zahtevo za dokaze o uporabi, zadeva več kot eno stranko.
Errors that concern incorrect handling of the files after an opposition decision has been taken, such as where the entire EUTM application is rejected but is still registered, are considered to affect both the applicant and the opponent.
Za napake v zvezi z nepravilnim ravnanjem s spisi po sprejetju odločbe o ugovoru, ko je na primer zavrnjena celotna prijava blagovne znamke EU, vendar je kljub temu registrirana, se šteje, da vplivajo tako na prijavitelja kot na vložnika ugovora.
Errors in registering a transfer of ownership also affect more than one party.
Tudi napake pri registraciji prenosa lastništva zadevajo več kot eno stranko.
While the procedure for recordal is essentially ex parte, the Office will determine if more than one party is affected for the purposes of the procedure for cancellation of the erroneous entry: the new owner, the old owner and the third party that should have been entered in the Register, as the case may be.
Čeprav je postopek za vpis v osnovi ex parte, bo Urad za namene postopka izbrisa napačnega vpisa določil, ali napaka vpliva na več kot eno stranko: novega imetnika, prejšnjega imetnika in tretjo osebo, ki bi morala biti vpisana v register, odvisno od primera.
1.3.2.1 Procedures when only one party is affected
Postopki, kadar napaka vpliva na le eno stranko
Error found by the Office
Napaka, ki jo ugotovi Urad
If the Office itself finds that an error has been made, it informs the party of its intention to revoke the decision/cancel the entry and sets a time limit of 1 month for observations.
Če Urad sam ugotovi, da je nastala napaka, stranko obvesti o svoji nameri, da bo razveljavil odločbo ali izbrisal vpis, in določi enomesečni rok za predložitev pripomb.
The letter must state the reasons for the revocation/cancellation.
Dopis mora vsebovati razloge za razveljavitev ali izbris.
If the party agrees or does not submit any observations, the Office revokes the decision/cancels the entry.
Če se stranka strinja z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom ali ne predloži nobene pripombe, Urad razveljavi odločbo ali izbriše vpis.
If the party does not agree to revocation or cancellation, a formal decision has to be taken, which is subject to the usual requirements described in the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 2, General Principles to be Respected in the Proceedings, paragraph 6.
Če pa se stranka ne strinja z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom, je treba sprejeti uradno odločbo, za katero veljajo običajne zahteve, opisane v Smernicah, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 2: Splošna načela, ki jih je treba upoštevati v postopku, odstavek 6.
Error notified by affected party
Napaka, ki jo sporoči prizadeta stranka
If the party adversely affected by an error informs the Office in writing of the error, there is no need to ask for observations.
Če stranka, ki jo je napaka prizadela, pisno obvesti Urad o tej napaki, ni treba zaprositi za predložitev pripomb.
In these cases, it must be determined whether revocation/cancellation is justified and possible.
V takšnih primerih je treba ugotoviti, ali je razveljavitev ali izbris upravičen in mogoč.
If so, the decision or entry in the Register is revoked/cancelled.
Če je temu tako, se odločba razveljavi ali vpis v register izbriše.
If the Office finds that there are no reasons for revocation/cancellation or it is no longer possible, it informs the party accordingly, giving appropriate reasons.
Če Urad ugotovi, da ni razlogov za razveljavitev ali izbris ali ta nista več mogoča, o tem ustrezno obvesti stranko in navede zadevne razloge.
1.3.2.2 Procedure when more than one party is affected
Postopek, kadar napaka vpliva na več kot eno stranko
If the Office itself finds that an error has been made, it informs both parties of its intention to revoke the decision/cancel the entry and sets a time limit of 1 month for observations.
Če Urad sam ugotovi, da je nastala napaka, obe stranki obvesti o svoji nameri, da bo razveljavil odločbo ali izbrisal vpis, in določi enomesečni rok za predložitev pripomb.
If the parties agree or do not submit any observations in reply, the Office revokes the decision/cancels the entry.
Če se stranki strinjata z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom ali v odgovor ne predložita nobene pripombe, Urad razveljavi odločbo ali izbriše vpis.
If the party that benefited from the error does not agree to the revocation/cancellation, a reasoned decision has to be taken, which is subject to the usual requirements described in the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 2, General Principles to be Respected in the Proceedings, paragraph 6.
Če se stranka, ki ima koristi od napake, ne strinja z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom, je treba sprejeti utemeljeno odločbo, za katero veljajo običajne zahteve, opisane v Smernicah, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 2: Splošna načela, ki jih je treba upoštevati v postopku, odstavek 6.
There is no need to hear the party adversely affected by the error if the Office adopts a decision in its favour.
Stranke, ki jo je napaka prizadela, ni treba zaslišati, če Urad sprejme odločbo, ki je njej v prid.
Error notified by one of the parties
Napaka, ki jo sporoči ena od strank
If the party adversely affected by an error informs the Office in writing of the error, it must be determined whether revocation/cancellation is justified and possible.
Če stranka, ki jo je napaka prizadela, Urad pisno obvesti o tej napaki, je treba ugotoviti, ali je razveljavitev ali izbris upravičen in mogoč.
If so, the Office notifies the party that benefited from the error (the other party) of its intention to revoke/cancel and sets a time limit of 1 month for observations (sending a copy of the notification to the first party for information purposes).
Če je tako, Urad stranko, ki je imela koristi od napake (druga stranka), obvesti o svoji nameri, da bo razveljavil odločbo ali izbrisal vpis, in določi enomesečni rok za predložitev pripomb (ter pošlje izvod tega obvestila prvi stranki v vednost).
If the other party agrees or does not submit any observations in reply, the Office revokes the decision/cancels the entry.
Če se druga stranka strinja z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom ali v odgovor ne predloži nobenih pripomb, Urad razveljavi odločbo ali izbriše vpis.
If the other party does not agree to revocation or cancellation, a reasoned decision has to be taken, which is subject to the usual requirements described in the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 2, General Principles to be Respected in the Proceedings, paragraph 6.
Če pa se druga stranka ne strinja z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom, je treba sprejeti utemeljeno odločbo, za katero veljajo običajne zahteve, opisane v Smernicah, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 2: Splošna načela, ki jih je treba upoštevati v postopku, odstavek 6.
There is no need to hear the party adversely affected by the error (the first party) if the Office adopts a decision in its favour.
Stranke, ki jo je napaka prizadela (prve stranke), ni treba zaslišati, če Urad sprejme odločbo, ki je njej v prid.
For example, where an opponent that has seen its opposition upheld and the EUTM application rejected informs the Office that the EUTM application has nevertheless been registered, the applicant must be informed and invited to submit observations.
Na primer, če vložnik ugovora, čigar ugovor je bil sprejet, prijava blagovne znamke EU pa je bila zavrnjena, Urad obvesti, da je bila prijava blagovne znamke EU kljub temu registrirana, je treba o tem obvestiti prijavitelja in ga pozvati k predložitvi pripomb.
The entry will be cancelled regardless of whether the applicant agrees or does not reply.
Vpis bo izbrisan tudi, če se prijavitelj s tem ne strinja ali ne odgovori.
If the party that benefited from the error informs the Office in writing, it must be determined whether revocation/cancellation is justified and possible.
Če stranka, ki ima koristi od napake, pisno obvesti Urad, je treba ugotoviti, ali je razveljavitev ali izbris upravičen in mogoč.
If so, the party adversely affected by the error must be informed accordingly.
V tem primeru je treba o tem ustrezno obvestiti stranko, ki jo je napaka prizadela.
As revocation/cancellation will be to the latter's advantage, the decision can be revoked or the entry cancelled at the same time as the letter is sent (to both parties).
Ker bo imela zadnjenavedena stranka koristi od razveljavitve ali izbrisa, se lahko odločba razveljavi ali vpis izbriše hkrati s pošiljanjem dopisa (obema strankama).
There is no need for the party that benefited from the error to submit observations, as its letter informing the Office of the error can be taken as its agreement to revocation/cancellation.
Stranki, ki je imela koristi od napake, ni treba predložiti pripomb, saj se lahko dopis, s katerim je Urad obvestila o napaki, šteje za njeno strinjanje z razveljavitvijo ali izbrisom.
Likewise, there is no need to hear the party adversely affected, as a decision is made in its favour.
Prav tako ni treba zaslišati stranke, ki jo je napaka prizadela, saj se sprejme odločba njej v prid.
For example, where an applicant informs the Office that its EUTM application has been registered despite being rejected in an opposition, the entry in the Register must be cancelled.
Na primer, ko prijavitelj Urad obvesti, da je bila njegova prijava blagovne znamke EU registrirana, čeprav jo je Urad zavrnil v okviru ugovora, je treba vpis v register izbrisati.
There is no need to hear either the applicant (who benefited from the error) or the opponent (who was adversely affected by it).
Zaslišati ni treba niti prijavitelja (ki je imel koristi od napake) niti vložnika ugovora (ki ga je napaka prizadela).