natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Although the reputation of an earlier mark must be established at the filing date of the contested mark, documents bearing a later date cannot be denied evidential value if they enable conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date (para. 52).
16/12/2010, T345/08 in T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potrjena z dne 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Čeprav je treba ugled prejšnje znamke opredeliti na datum vložitve prijave sporne znamke, ni mogoče zanikati dokazne vrednosti dokumentov s poznejšim datumom, če je mogoče na podlagi njih sprejeti ugotovitev v zvezi s stanjem na ta datum (točka 52).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed by 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The press articles submitted proved that there was significant media coverage of the products marketed under the trade mark BOTOX on the filing date of the disputed marks (para. 53).
16/12/2010, T345/08 in T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potrjena z dne 10/05/2012, C100/11 P S predloženimi članki je bilo dokazano, da so mediji na datum prijave spornih znamk veliko poročali o izdelkih, ki so se tržili pod znamko BOTOX (točka 53).
17/03/2015, T611/11, Manea Spa, EU:T:2015:152 (Relevant Classes 3, 24, 25, 43 and 44) The word mark ‘Spa' was used as part of another registration combining the word element with the logo of a pantomime character, as reproduced here .
17/03/2015, T611/11, Manea Spa, EU:T:2015:152 (Upoštevni razredi 3, 24, 25, 43 in 44) Besedna znamka „Spa“ se je uporabljala kot del druge registracije in je besedni element združila z logotipom pantomimskega lika, kot je prikazano tu .
The word element occupies a central position in the complex sign, and therefore plays a ‘distinct and predominant' role.
Besedni element ima osrednji položaj v sestavljenem znaku in ima tako „izrazito in prevladujočo vlogo“.
17/02/2011, T10/09, F1-Live, EU:T:2011:45; 24/05/2012, C196/11 P, F1-Live, EU:C:2012:314 (Relevant Classes 16, 38 and 41) and 21/05/2005, T55/13, F1H20 / F1 et al., EU:T:2015:309 (Relevant Classes 9, 25, 38 and 41) On the other hand, in case T10/09 it was held that the evidence of reputation referred to the earlier figurative mark ‘F1 Formula 1' and not to the earlier word marks, ‘F1'.
17/02/2011, T10/09, F1-Live, EU:T:2011:45; 24/05/2012, C196/11 P, F1-Live, EU:C:2012:314 (upoštevni razredi 16, 38 in 41) ter 21/05/2005, T55/13, F1H20 / F1 et al., EU:T:2015:309 (upoštevni razredi 9, 25, 38 in 41) Po drugi strani je bilo v zadevi T10/09 ugotovljeno, da se dokazi glede ugleda nanašajo na prejšnjo figurativno znamko „F1 Formula 1“ , in ne na prejšnje besedne znamke „F1“.
Without its particular logotype the text ‘Formula 1' and its abbreviation ‘F1' are perceived as descriptive elements for a category of racing cars or races involving those cars.
Brez značilnega logotipa besedilo „Formula 1“ in njegova okrajšava „F1“ delujeta kot opisna elementa za kategorijo dirkalnih avtomobilov ali dirke s temi avtomobili.
The reputation was not proven for the word marks (see paras 53, 54 and 67).
Ugled za besedne znamke ni bil dokazan (glej točke 53, 54 in 67).
In case T55/13, the Court held that the reputation with which the complex sign ‘F1' is associated did not benefit the word element alone, which does not play a ‘predominant or even significant' role in the earlier figurative mark (see para. 47).
Sodišče je v zadevi T55/13 odločilo, da ugled, s katerim se povezuje sestavljeni znak „F1“, ni koristil samo besednemu elementu, ki nima „prevladujoče ali celo pomembne“ vloge v prejšnji figurativni znamki (glej točko 47).
12/02/2015, T76/13, QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, EU:T:2015:94 The same conclusion applies to a ‘winged hourglass' figurative element used in a complex mark in association with the word ‘Longines'.
12/02/2015, T76/13, QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, EU:T:2015:94 Enaka ugotovitev velja za figurativni element „peščena ura s krili“, uporabljen v sestavljeni znamki v povezavi z besedo „Longines“ .
The figurative element remains clearly ancillary and in the background in the overall impression conveyed by the complex mark (paras 104 to 106).
Jasno je, da figurativni element ostaja zgolj pomožen in v ozadju celotnega vtisa, ki ga daje sestavljena znamka (točke od 104 do 106).
The Court found that the opponent had failed to submit opinion polls showing the recognition of the ‘winged hourglass' logo independently of the word element, and the use of this figurative element alone in a limited number of documents was found insufficient from both a quantitative and qualitative point of view (paras 91 to 93 and para. 112).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da vložnik ugovora ni predložil javnomnenjskih raziskav, ki bi kazale prepoznavnost logotipa „peščene ure s krili“ neodvisno od besednega elementa, za uporabo samo tega figurativnega elementa v omejenem številu dokumentov pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da je nezadostna s kvantitativnega in kvalitativnega vidika (točke od 91 do 93 in 112).
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq, EU:T:2007:131 The opponent provided detailed evidence relating to the intensity, geographical extent and duration of use of its trade mark, Nasdaq, as well as to the amount spent in promoting it, demonstrating that it was known by a significant part of the relevant public.
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq, EU:T:2007:131 Vložnik ugovora je zagotovil podrobne dokaze o intenzivnosti, geografskem obsegu in trajanju uporabe svoje znamke Nasdaq ter dokaze o znesku, ki ga je porabil za njeno promocijo, ter s tem dokazal, da je bila znana znatnemu delu upoštevne javnosti.
The Court considered that the fact that it did not produce figures regarding market share did not call this finding into question (para. 51).
Sodišče je menilo, da nepredložitev podatkov o tržnem deležu ni sprožilo dvomov v zvezi s to ugotovitvijo (točka 51).
The Court concluded that, first, the factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serve as examples, as all relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence produced by the intervener is already sufficient in itself to conclusively prove the reputation of its mark, Nasdaq (para. 52).
Ugotovilo je, da se, prvič, dejavniki, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri ugotavljanju ugleda prejšnje znamke, uporabljajo samo kot primer za ponazoritev, saj je treba upoštevati vse pomembne dokaze v zadevi, vsi drugi podrobni in preverljivi dokazi, ki jih je predložil intervenient, pa že sami po sebi zadostujejo za prepričljivo potrditev ugleda njegove znamke Nasdaq (točka 52).
24/02/2010, R 765/20091, Bob the Builder (fig.) / BOB et al. The evidence submitted proved that the earlier mark enjoyed a very significant reputation in Sweden for jellies, jams, fruit stews, fruit drinks, concentrates for production of drinks and juice'.
24/02/2010, R 765/20091, Bob the Builder (fig.) / BOB et al. Iz predloženih dokazov je bilo razvidno, da je imela prejšnja znamka precejšen ugled na Švedskem na področju želejev, džemov, sadnih omak, sadnih pijač ter koncentratov za izdelavo pijač in sokov.
According to the survey conducted by TNS Gallup, spontaneous awareness (answers by telephone to the question ‘What brands for - ‘the relevant group of products is mentioned' - have you heard about or do you know about?') of the trade mark ‘BOB' varied between 25 % and 71 %, depending on the goods: apple sauces, jams, marmalades, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices.
Po raziskavi, ki jo je opravila družba TNS Gallup, se je naključno poznavanje (odgovori po telefonu na vprašanje Za katere znamke - nato je bila omenjena zadevna skupina izdelkov - ste že slišali ali jih poznate?) znamke „BOB“ gibalo med 25 in 71 %, odvisno od blaga: jabolčne omake, džemi, marmelade, brezalkoholne pijače, sadni napitki in sadni sokovi.
Supported awareness (answers to a questionnaire showing the products bearing the mark) varied between 49 % and 90 %, depending on the goods.
Spodbujeno poznavanje (odgovori na vprašalnik, na katerem so bili prikazani proizvodi z znamko) se je gibalo med 49 in 90 %, odvisno od blaga.
Furthermore, the market share for 2001 to 2006 averaged 30-35 % in the above product groups (para. 34).
Poleg tega je tržni delež te znamke med letoma 2001 in 2006 v povprečju znašal 30-35 % v zgoraj navedenih skupinah izdelkov (točka 34).
13/12/2004, T08/03, Emilio Pucci, EU:T:2004:358 The Court considered that the opponent failed to prove the enhanced distinctiveness or reputation of its earlier trade marks, since the evidence submitted (advertisements, seven letters from a number of advertising directors and a video cassette) did not include adequately substantiated or verifiable objective evidence to make it possible to assess the market share held by the marks Emilio Pucci in Spain, how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing use of the marks had been, or the amount invested by the undertaking in promoting them (para. 73).
13/12/2004, T08/03, Emilio Pucci, EU:T:2004:358 Sodišče je menilo, da vložnik ugovora ni dokazal povečanega razlikovalnega učinka ali ugleda v zvezi s svojimi prejšnjimi znamkami, saj predloženi dokazi (oglasi, sedem dopisov različnih založnikov medijev in videokaseta) niso vsebovali dovolj utemeljenih ali preverljivih objektivnih dokazov, s katerimi bi bilo mogoče presoditi tržni delež, ki ga imajo znamke Emilio Pucci v Španiji, intenzivnost, geografski obseg in trajanje njihove uporabe ali obseg naložb podjetja v njihovo promocijo (točka 73).
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112, KENZO / KENZO KENZO identifies, in the eyes of the European public, a pre-eminent provider of recognised fashion and luxury items in the form of perfumes, cosmetics and clothing.
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112, KENZO / KENZO Znamka KENZO v očeh evropske javnosti označuje uglednega dobavitelja priznanih modnih in luksuznih izdelkov, kot so parfumi, kozmetični izdelki in oblačila.
The relevant public however was considered to be the general public (para. 29).
Upoštevna javnost pa je bila v tem primeru splošna javnost (točka 29).
12/01/2011, R 446/20101, TURBOMANIA / TURBOMANIA The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public.
12/01/2011, R 446/20101, TURBOMANIA / TURBOMANIA Omejena navzočnost izdelka na trgu nikakor ni bila razlog, da izdelek ne bi postal dobro znan pri upoštevni javnosti.
The evidence clearly showed that the trade mark appeared continuously in specialist magazines for the market from December 2003 to March 2007 (the date of the EUTM application).
Iz dokazov je bilo jasno razvidno, da se je znamka nenehno pojavljala v specializiranih revijah za ta trg od decembra 2003 do marca 2007 (datum prijave blagovne znamke EU).
That meant that the public targeted by the magazines had constant, ongoing exposure to the opponent's trade mark over a long period covering more than 3 years prior to the relevant date.
To je pomenilo, da je bila ciljna javnost teh revij nenehno izpostavljena znamki vložnika ugovora v daljšem obdobju, ki je zajemalo več kot tri leta pred upoštevnim datumom.
Such a huge presence in the press specifically targeting the relevant public was more than sufficient evidence that the relevant public was aware of the trade mark (para. 31).
Tako velika navzočnost v tisku, ki je bila posebej usmerjena v upoštevno javnost, je bila več kot zadosten dokaz, da je upoštevna javnost poznala znamko (točka 31).
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq The opponent submitted evidence showing that the mark Nasdaq appeared almost daily, particularly with reference to the Nasdaq indices, in many newspapers and on many television channels that can be read/viewed throughout Europe.
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq Vložnik ugovora je predložil dokaze, iz katerih je bilo razvidno, da se je znamka Nasdaq, zlasti v zvezi z indeksi Nasdaq, skoraj vsak dan pojavljala v številnih časopisih in na televizijskih programih, ki jih je mogoče brati oziroma gledati po vsej Evropi.
The opponent also submitted evidence of substantial investments in advertising.
Vložnik ugovora je predložil tudi dokaze o znatnih naložbah v oglaševanje.
The Court found reputation proven, even though the opponent did not submit any market share figures (paras 47 to 52).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je ugled dokazan, čeprav vložnik ugovora ni predložil podatkov o tržnem deležu (točke od 47 do 52).
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. The documents submitted (press articles, sales figures, surveys) showed that the earlier sign, CIALIS, was intensively used before the filing date of the EUTM application, that the products under the mark CIALIS were marketed in several Member States where they enjoyed a consolidated position among the leading brands, and that there was a high degree of recognition when compared with the market leader Viagra.
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. Iz predloženih dokumentov (člankov, podatkov o prodaji, raziskav) je bilo razvidno, da se je prejšnji znak CIALIS intenzivno uporabljal pred datumom vložitve prijave blagovne znamke EU, da so se izdelki pod znamko CIALIS tržili v več državah članicah, kjer so imeli utrjen položaj med vodilnimi znamkami, in da je imel znak visoko stopnjo prepoznavnosti v primerjavi z znamko VIAGRA, ki je bila vodilna na trgu.
Large and constantly growing market share and sales numbers also showed ‘the vast expansion of CIALIS' (para. 55).
Iz velikega in nenehno rastočega tržnega deleža ter podatkov o prodaji je bil prav tako razviden velik porast znamke CIALIS“ (točka 55).
Reputation was not sufficiently proven, in particular because none of the documents referred to recognition of the earlier trade mark by the relevant end consumers.
Ugled ni bil zadovoljivo dokazan, zlasti ker se noben dokument ni nanašal na prepoznavnost prejšnje znamke pri upoštevnih končnih potrošnikih.
Nor was any evidence about the market share of the opponent's goods submitted.
Predložen ni bil tudi noben dokaz o tržnem deležu blaga vložnika ugovora.
Information about market share is particularly important in the sector in which the opponent had its core business (handbags, transport items, accessories and clothing), as it is ‘a quite atomized and competitive sector' and ‘there are many different competitors and designers in that product range' (paras 59 to 61).
Informacije o tržnem deležu so zlasti pomembne v sektorju, v katerem je vložnik ugovora opravljal svoj osnovni posel (ročne torbice, potovalni izdelki, dodatki in oblačila), ki je precej razpršen in konkurenčen sektor in v katerem je veliko različnih tekmecev in oblikovalcev takih izdelkov“ (točke od 59 do 61).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public.
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ/FLATZ Čeprav prejšnja znamka zaradi višje sile ni mogla postati znana po tradicionalnih metodah, torej s prodajo izdelka, je postala zelo znana zaradi promocijskih dejavnosti, nenehnega obširnega obveščanja javnosti o znamki v specializiranem tisku in na sektorskih sejmih, zaradi česar je dejansko dosegla vse tri upoštevne dele javnosti.
The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public that, on the relevant date, FLATZ was the trade mark with which the opponent identified its electronic bingo machines (paras 41, 42, 50 and 51).
Omejena navzočnost izdelka na trgu upoštevni javnosti ni preprečila, da na zadevni datum ne bi bila dobro seznanjena z dejstvom, da je FLATZ znamka, s katero vložnik ugovora označuje svoje naprave za elektronski bingo (točke 41, 42, 50 in 51).
The lack of figures regarding market share held by the trade mark ARENA in the relevant countries was not in itself capable of calling the finding of reputation into question.
Nerazpoložljivost podatkov o tržnem deležu znamke ARENA v upoštevnih državah sama po sebi ni bila dovolj, da bi bila zaradi nje vprašljiva ugotovitev glede ugleda.
First, the list of factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serves to illustrate examples, as all the relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence submitted by the opponent is already sufficient in itself to prove conclusively the substantial degree of recognition of the ARENA mark amongst the relevant public (para. 59).
Prvič, seznam dejavnikov, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri ugotavljanju ugleda prejšnje znamke se uporablja samo za ponazoritev primerov, saj je treba upoštevati vse pomembne dokaze v zadevi, in drugič, vsi drugi podrobni in preverljivi dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, že sami po sebi zadostujejo za prepričljivo potrditev znatne stopnje prepoznavnosti znamke ARENA pri upoštevni javnosti (točka 59).
If the earlier mark were so well known in the 27 Member States of the EU for TV broadcasting and magazines, it should have been easy for the opponent to provide information about ‘the reach of the mark' just before 2008, when the EUTM application was filed.
Če bi bila prejšnja znamka tako dobro znana v 27 državah članicah EU zaradi televizijskih oddaj in revij, bi moral vložnik ugovora brez težav zagotoviti informacije o „dosegu znamke“ neposredno pred letom 2008, ko je bila vložena prijava blagovne znamke EU.
The magazine sales figures did not cover the right period.
Podatki o prodaji revij se niso nanašali na pravilno obdobje.
Nor did the documents submitted give any indication of the extent to which the public was aware of the mark (paras 16 and 18).
V predloženih dokumentih tudi ni bilo navedeno, v kolikšnem obsegu je bila znamka znana javnosti (točki 16 in 18).
The evidence submitted showed a particularly impressive duration of use (over 30 years) and geographical extent of use (over seventy-five countries worldwide, including the Member States concerned) for the ARENA brand (para. 55).
Iz predloženih dokazov sta bila razvidna zlasti dolgo trajanje uporabe (več kot trideset let) in velik geografski obseg uporabe znamke ARENA (več kot 75 držav po vsem svetu, vključno z upoštevnimi državami članicami) (točka 55).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (appeal dismissed in 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) The Beatles group was considered to be a group with an exceptional reputation, lasting for more than 40 years (para. 36).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (pritožba zavrnjena dne 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) Skupina The Beatles je bila skupina z izjemnim ugledom, ki traja več kot 40 let (točka 36).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Evidence of the promotion of BOTOX in English in the scientific and general-interest press was sufficient to establish the mark's reputation amongst both the general public and health-care professionals (paras 65 and 66).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Dokazi o promociji znamke BOTOX v angleškem jeziku v znanstvenem in splošnem tisku so zadostovali za ugotovitev ugleda znamke pri splošni javnosti in med strokovnimi zdravstvenimi delavci (točki 65 in 66).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public.
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Čeprav prejšnja znamka zaradi višje sile ni mogla postati znana po tradicionalnih metodah, torej s prodajo izdelka, je postala zelo znana zaradi promocijskih dejavnosti, nenehnega obširnega obveščanja javnosti o znamki v specializiranem tisku in na sektorskih sejmih, zaradi česar je dejansko dosegla vse tri upoštevne dele javnosti.
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO The opponent's goods have been advertised and articles have been written about them in many of the world's leading fashion-related lifestyle magazines, and in some of Europe's leading mainstream periodicals.
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO Oglasi in članki o blagu vložnika ugovora so bili objavljeni v številnih vodilnih, z modo povezanih revijah o življenjskem slogu in v nekaterih vodilnih splošnih evropskih medijih.
In line with the case-law, the reputation of KENZO for the said goods is confirmed.
V skladu s sodno prakso je ugled znamke KENZO v zvezi z navedenim blagom potrjen.
The goods for which the earlier mark has reputation are cosmetics, perfumes and clothing.
Blago, v zvezi s katerim ima prejšnja znamka ugled, so kozmetični izdelki, parfumi in oblačila.
Because of its substantial reputation, the earlier mark KENZO possesses an ‘undisputable allure' that can be transferred to nearly any luxury product (para. 33).
Zaradi znatnega ugleda je prejšnja znamka KENZO nedvomno privlačna, kar se lahko prenese na skoraj vsak luksuzni izdelek (točka 33).
A subsequent case confirmed this reputation (para. 33).
Poznejša zadeva je potrdila ta ugled (točka 33).
It is apparent from Ferrero's various advertising campaigns on Italian television (including Rai) that the earlier mark was widely exposed to viewers in 2005 and 2006.
Iz različnih oglaševalskih kampanj Ferrera na italijanski televiziji (vključno z RAI) je razvidno, da so bili gledalci v letih 2005 in 2006 precej izpostavljeni prejšnji znamki.
Many of these spots appear to have been broadcast at peak viewing times (e.g. during Formula 1 Grand Prix coverage) (para. 41).
Veliko teh oglasov je bilo očitno prikazanih v času največje gledanosti (npr. med prenosom dirke za veliko nagrado v formuli 1) (točka 41).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (under appeal, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) The opponent's trade mark is not only known per se but, due to the high price of sports cars and the opponent's intensive expenditure on advertising, and against the background of its successes in racing, the public associates it with an image of luxury, high technology and high performance (para. 31).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (predmet pritožbe, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) Znamka vložnika ugovora ni znana le sama po sebi, ampak jo zaradi visoke cene športnih avtomobilov in velikih izdatkov vložnika ugovora za oglaševanje, skupaj z njegovim uspehom na področju dirk, tudi javnost povezuje s podobo razkošja, visoke tehnologije in izjemne učinkovitosti (točka 31).
14/06/2012, R 1637/20115, made by APART since 1975 / Apart et al. The new evidence submitted by the appellant and accepted by BoA shows that the earlier mark had consistently been granted a high brand rating as well as prizes in surveys carried out by specialised companies in Poland between 2005 and 2009 (para. 30).
14/06/2012, R 1637/20115, made by APART since 1975 / Apart et al. Iz novih dokazov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, odbor za pritožbe pa jih je sprejel, je bilo razvidno, da je prejšnja znamka nenehno prejemala visoke ocene znamke in nagrade v raziskavah, ki so jih specializirane družbe na Poljskem opravile med letoma 2005 in 2009 (točka 30).
It was therefore considered that the appellant successfully proved reputation in Poland for jewellery, but did not prove reputation for the other goods and services covered by its earlier signs.
Zato se je štelo, da je pritožnik na Poljskem uspešno dokazal ugled v zvezi z nakitom, ni pa dokazal ugleda za drugo blago in storitve, ki jih označujejo njegovi prejšnji znaki.