natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is no more apt ‘icon' - which is nothing more than a small graphic representation of a program or file - to represent an electronic message than an envelope.
Za prikaz elektronskega sporočila ni primernejše ikone, ki ni nič drugega kot majhen grafični prikaz progama ali datoteke, kot je kuverta.
The ‘tick' indicates that something has been done correctly or that something has been checked (paras 16 and 17).
Kljukica kaže, da je bilo nekaj storjeno pravilno ali da je bilo pregledano (točki 16 in 17).
It is well known what these kind of icons look like (para. 19).
Znano je, kako so videti tovrstne ikone (točka 19).
Refused for Class 9 goods.
Zavrnjeno za blago iz razreda 9.
The public will encounter this used as a pictogram on a mobile phone, computer, tablet or similar to indicate access to a program or application that allows the user to make notes or write text.
Javnost na ta piktogram naleti na mobilnem telefonu, računalniku, tabličnem računalniku ali podobnih napravah, kaže pa dostop do programa ali aplikacije, ki uporabniku omogoča pisanje beležk ali besedila.
Some of these applications convert handwriting into typewritten text.
Nekatere od teh aplikacij pisavo spremenijo v tipkano besedilo.
EUTM No 12 717 914
Blagovna znamka EU št.
Class 43: Restaurant services; Restaurants featuring home delivery.
Razred 43: Storitve restavracij; Restavracije z dostavo na dom. Blagovna znamka EU št.
Sign Reasoning Case No
Znak Obrazložitev Št. zadeve
The sign says a lot about the nature of the goods and very little, if anything, about the identity of the producer (para. 11).
Znak veliko pove o lastnostih blaga in zelo malo, če sploh kaj, o proizvajalcu (točka 11).
Here, the colour yellow may be perceived as a decoration for the goods, as well as for the purpose of attracting attention to the goods, without giving any specific information or precise message as to the commercial origin of the goods.
Rumeno barvo je mogoče v tem primeru razumeti kot okrasni element blaga in privabljanje pozornosti in ne kot navajanje določenih informacij ali natančnega sporočila glede trgovskega izvora blaga.
15/01/2013, R 444/20122, DEVICE OF A LABEL IN COLOUR YELLOW (fig.)
11 177 912, za katero je vložena prijava za razrede 29, 30 in 31 Blagovna znamka EU št.
BoA confirmed that the figurative element ‘KANGOO JUMPS' (in both the upper and lower spring layers) and the letters ‘KJ' and ‘XR' (at the ends of the intermediate elastic plastic straps) could only be seen with great difficulty or not at all.
Odbor za pritožbe je potrdil, da so figurativni element „KANGOO JUMPS“ (na zgornji in spodnji plasti vzmeti) in črke „KJ“ in „XR“ (na koncih vmesnih elastičnih plastičnih jermenov) le težko vidni ali jih sploh ni mogoče videti.
Parts such as these, which can only be noticed on close inspection, are, in general, not to be perceived as an indication of origin (para. 29).
Deli, kot so ti, ki jih je mogoče opaziti samo pri temeljitem pregledu, se na splošno ne zaznajo kot označba izvora (točka 29).
An image depicting certain stones is embossed on the central part of the bottle.
Na osrednjem delu steklenice je reliefna slika z določenimi kamni.
The Court confirmed the BoA decision when it considered that the applicant had failed to prove that European consumers have sufficient information and knowledge to recognise that the embossing on the central part of the bottle at issue depicts the twelve-angle stones used in Inca constructions.
Sodišče je potrdilo odločbo odbora za pritožbe, ki je menil, da prijavitelj ni dokazal, da imajo evropski potrošniki dovolj informacij in znanja ter lahko prepoznajo, da relief na osrednjem delu zadevne steklenice prikazuje dvanajstkotne kamne, ki so jih Inki uporabljali pri gradnji.
Without that proof, European consumers will merely perceive the embossing as such without being aware of its significance, from which it follows that they will simply perceive it as a mere decoration without any distinctive character, because it is not particularly original or striking; therefore, it will not serve to differentiate the bottle in question from other bottles widely used in the packaging of beers (para. 25 et seq.).
Evropski potrošniki bodo brez tega dokaza relief zaznali samo kot takšen in ne bodo prepoznali njegovega pomena, iz česar sledi, da ga bodo zaznali samo kot okras brez razločevalnega učinka, ker ni posebno izviren ali izrazit, zato zadevne steklenice ne bo razlikoval od drugih steklenic, ki se na splošno uporabljajo za pakiranje piva (točka 25 in naslednje).
The Court considered that the descriptive element ‘fun' could not confer distinctiveness on the 3D sign.
Sodišče je menilo, da opisni element „fun“ ne more imeti razlikovalnega učinka za tridimenzionalni znak.
Moreover, the BoA was right not to take into account the element ‘factory' written above the word ‘fun', as it was illegible in the application (para. 34 et seq.).
Odbor za pritožbe upravičeno ni upošteval elementa „factory“ nad besedo „fun“, saj je bil v prijavi nečitljiv (točka 34 in naslednje).
Figurative marks showing a graphic representation of a naturalistic reproduction of the goods themselves are not distinctive in relation to such goods.
Figurativne znamke, ki grafično predstavljajo naraven videz blaga, nimajo razlikovalnega učinka za takšno blago.
The representation of a tablet for washing or dishwashing preparations in tablet form was refused.
Predstavitev tablete za proizvod za pranje perila in pomivanje posode v obliki tablete je bila zavrnjena.
The shape, namely a rectangular tablet, is a basic shape and an obvious one for a product intended for use in washing machines or dishwashers.
Pravokotna tableta je osnovna oblika, ki je očitna za proizvod, namenjen uporabi v pralnih in pomivalnih strojih.
The slightly rounded corners of the tablet are not likely to be perceived by the consumer as a distinctive feature of the shape at issue (19/09/2001, T30/00, red-white squared washing tablet (fig.), EU:T:2001:223, § 44, 53).
Potrošnik nekoliko zaobljenih vogalov tablete verjetno ne bo prepoznal kot razlikovalno lastnost zadevne oblike (19/09/2001, T30/00, red-white squared washing tablet (fig.), EU:T:2001:223, § 44, 53).
The same approach has been confirmed by several judgments, including that of 04/10/2007, C144/06 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2007:577. 19
Enak pristop je potrdilo več sodb, tudi sodba z dne 04/10/2007, C144/06 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2007:577. 19
This shape was refused as it is merely a variant of a common shape of this type of product, i.e. flashlights (para. 31).
Ta oblika je bila zavrnjena, ker je samo različica običajne oblike takšne vrste proizvoda, tj. žepne svetilke (točka 31).
This shape was refused because it does not depart significantly from the norm or customs of the sector.
Ta oblika je bila zavrnjena, ker ne odstopa veliko od standarda ali navad v sektorju.
Even though the goods in this sector typically consist of long shapes, various other shapes exist in the market that are spherical or round (para. 29).
Čeprav blago v tem sektorju običajno vključujejo dolge oblike, na trgu obstajajo tudi najrazličnejše druge oblike, ki so podolgovate ali okrogle (točka 29).
The addition of the small descriptive word element ‘fun factory' does not remove the overall shape from the scope of non-distinctiveness (para. 36).
Samo zaradi dodanega majhnega opisnega besednega elementa „fun factory“ se celotna oblika ne more izogniti ugotovitvi, da nima razlikovalnega učinka (točka 36).
The Court of Justice confirmed the refusal of this three-dimensional sign as not being sufficiently different from the shapes and colours of those commonly used in the sweet and chocolate sectors.
Sodišče je potrdilo zavrnitev te tridimenzionalne znamke, ker se ne razlikuje dovolj od oblik in barv, ki se običajno uporabljajo v sektorju proizvodnje bonbonov in čokolade.
The combination with figurative elements will not lead to the application of the criteria for two-dimensional marks.
Kombinacija s figurativnimi elementi ne omogoča uporabe meril za dvodimenzionalne znamke.
This shape mark consisting of a handle, applied to goods in Class 8 (hand-operated implements used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, including secateurs, pruning shears, hedge clippers, shearers (hand instruments)) was refused.
Ta oblikovna znamka, sestavljena iz ročaja, ki se uporablja za blago iz razreda 8 (orodja na ročno upravljanje, ki se uporabljajo v kmetijstvu, vrtnarstvu in gozdarstvu, vključno z vrtnarskimi škarjami, škarjami za obrezovanje drevja, škarjami za obrezovanje žive meje, napravami za striženje (ročno orodje)), je bila zavrnjena.
The Court confirmed the case-law on non-distinctiveness of shape marks in the form of a product or its packaging.
Sodišče je potrdilo sodno prakso o nerazlikovalnem učinku oblikovnih znamk v obliki proizvoda ali njegove embalaže.
Even if the oval shape in the EUTM application has a complex hollow on its surface, this cannot be considered as significantly different from the shapes of confectionery available on the market.
Čeprav ima ovalna oblika iz prijave blagovne znamke EU na površini kompleksno vdolbino, se to ne more šteti za pomembno drugačno od oblik sladkarij, ki so na voljo na trgu.
The parrot figure applied for, on its own, does not depart sufficiently from the usual form of parrot toys to be seen as a trade mark.
Figurica papige, za katero je vložena prijava, ne odstopa dovolj od običajne oblike igrač v obliki papige, da bi se lahko štela za blagovno znamko.
Its coat colour resembles the green quite common among parrots.
Barva perja je primerljiva z zeleno barvo, ki je med papigami precej pogosta.
Its head is bigger than normal and it is standing on its hind legs but, in the Board's opinion, the majority of consumers would perceive the parrot shape as an ordinary parrot-shaped toy design, and a rather banal toy, but not as an indication of origin (para. 16).
Glava papige je večja od običajne, papiga pa stoji na nogah, vendar bi po mnenju odbora večina potrošnikov obliko papige zaznala kot običajen model igrače v obliki papige in precej vsakdanjo igračo, ne pa kot označbo izvora (točka 16).
Sign Reasoning EUTM No
Znak Obrazložitev Št. blagovne znamke EU
Accepted for toys EUTM No 15 240 534
Sprejeto za igrače Blagovna znamka EU št.
Class 35 - Retail Services for various goods and services.
Znak Obrazložitev Št. zadeve
The case-law on marks consisting of the shape of the goods applies also with respect to services.
Razred 35 - Storitve prodaje na drobno za različno blago in storitve.
Such ‘get-up' is only distinctive where it significantly departs from the norms of the relevant sector.
Ta predstavitev je razlikovalna samo, če znatno odstopa od standardov v zadevnem sektorju.
The salesroom depicted in the application will be perceived as having the merely functional purpose of enabling consumers to purchase conveniently the goods and services offered for inspection and sale.
Prodajni prostor, prikazan v prijavi, se zaznava, kot da ima samo funkcionalni namen, ki je omogočanje potrošnikom, da enostavno kupijo blago in storitve, ki so v ponudbi za pregled in prodajo.
The shape applied for was refused as it was considered that bunny-shaped chocolate with gold wrapping is a common phenomenon on the market corresponding to the industry concerned.
Oblika, za katero je vložena prijava, je bila zavrnjena, ker se je štelo, da je čokolada v obliki zajčka s pozlačenim ovojem običajna značilnost na trgu in ustreza navadam v zadevni industrijski panogi.
An analysis of the individual elements, that is, the shape of a rabbit, the gold foil wrapping and the red ribbon with a bell, were held both individually and cumulatively devoid of distinctive character (paras 44-47).
Analiza posameznih elementov, tj. oblike zajca, pozlačenega papirja in rdečega traku z zvončkom, gledano posebej ali skupaj, ni pokazala razlikovalnega učinka (točke od 44 do 47).
The mark, the representation of a twisted wrapper serving as packaging for sweets (and thus not the product itself), was refused registration as it is a ‘normal and traditional shape for a sweet wrapper and … a large number of sweets so wrapped could be found on the market' (para. 56).
Registracija te znamke, ki predstavlja obliko zavitka, ki se uporablja kot embalaža za bombone (in zato ne samega proizvoda), je bila zavrnjena, ker je „normalna in običajna oblika zavitka bombona ter ker je mogoče na trgu najti veliko število tako zavitih bonbonov“ (točka 56).
The same applies in respect of the colour of the wrapper in question, namely ‘light brown (caramel)'.
Enako velja za zadevno barvo zavitka, in sicer „svetlo rjavo (karamelno)“.
This colour is not unusual in itself, and neither is it rare to see it used for sweet wrappers (para. 56).
Ta barva sama po sebi ni neobičajna in njeno uporabo za zavitke bombonov je mogoče pogosto opaziti (točka 56).
Therefore, the average consumer will not perceive this packaging in and of itself as an indicator of origin, but merely as a sweet wrapper.
Zato povprečen potrošnik te embalaže kot take in same po sebi ne bo zaznal kot označbe izvora, temveč le kot zavitek bonbona.
The refusal of the shape applied for was confirmed by the General Court.
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo zavrnitev oblike, za katero je bila vložena prijava.
The elongated neck and the flattened body do not depart from the usual shape of a bottle containing the goods for which protection was sought, namely food products including juices, condiments and dairy products.
Raztegnjen vrat in ploščato telo se ne oddaljita od navadne oblike steklenice, v kateri je ustekleničeno blago, za katero se zahteva varstvo, tj. živila, ki vključujejo sokove, začimbne dodatke k jedem in mlečne izdelke.
In addition, neither the length of the neck, its diameter nor the proportion between the width and thickness of the bottle is in any way individual (para. 50).
Poleg tega niti dolžina in premer vratu niti razmerje med širino in debelino steklenice nikakor ne zbujajo pozornosti (točka 50).
Furthermore, even if the ridges around the sides of the bottle could be considered distinctive, these alone are insufficient to affect the overall impression given by the shape applied for to such an extent that it departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector (para. 53).
Tudi če bi lahko stranske vdolbine na steklenici šteli za nenavadno posebnost, samo te ne bi zadostovale za to, da bi vplivale na celotni vtis, ki ga ustvarja prijavljena znamka, tako da bi se slednja bistveno razlikovala od standarda ali navad v sektorju (točka 53).
It is a well-known fact that bottles usually contain lines and creases on them.
Znano je, da so na steklenicah običajno črte in vdolbine.
The relief at the top is not sufficiently striking but will be perceived as a mere decorative element.
Relief na vrhu ni dovolj izrazit in se bo zaznal kot le okrasni element.
As a whole, the combination of the elements is not sufficiently distinctive.
Celotna kombinacija elementov ni dovolj razlikovalna.
The average consumer of the goods in Class 32 would not consider the shape as an indicator of origin of goods in Class 32. 19
Povprečen potrošnik blaga iz razreda 32 oblike ne bi štel za označbo izvora blaga iz razreda 32. 19
The shape does not depart significantly from the norms and customs of the sector, ‘where what is involved is the packaging of a liquid product and the sign consists of the appearance of the product itself'.
Znak ne odstopa pomembno od standardov in navad v zadevnem sektorju, „kadar gre za embaliranje tekočega proizvoda in ima ta znak videz proizvoda“.
07/05/2015, C445/13 P, Bottle, EU:C:2015:303, confirming 28/05/2013, T178/11, Bottle, EU:T:2013:272
Sodba z dne 07/05/2015, C445/13 P, Bottle, EU:C:2015:303, ki potrjuje sodbo z dne 28/05/2013, T178/11, Bottle, EU:T:2013:272
Accepted for goods in Classes 29, 30, 32 EUTM No 12 485 702
Sprejeto za blago iz razredov 29, 30 in 32 Blagovna znamka EU št.
The Board of Appeal considered that the shape is not common in the market sector in question.
Odbor za pritožbe je menil, da oblika v zadevnem tržnem sektorju ni običajna.
In this case, the General Court upheld an objection under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR.
V tem primeru je Splošno sodišče podprlo ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
The mark description specified that ‘The mark consists of the position of the circular and rectangular fields on a watch face'.
V opisu znamke je navedeno, da je „znamka sestavljena iz položaja okroglih in pravokotnih polj na številčnici zapestne ure“.
The Court considered that the mark was not independent or distinguishable from the form or design of the product itself and that the positioned elements were not substantially different from other designs on the market.
Sodišče je odločilo, da znamka ni neodvisna oziroma da se ne razlikuje od oblike ali modela samega proizvoda in da položaj elementov ni pomembno drugačen od drugih modelov na trgu.
In this case involving hosiery consisting of an orange strip covering the toe area, the General Court considered that there was no evidence to suggest that the colouring of this part of the product would normally be perceived as having trade mark character.
V tem primeru, ki vključuje nogavice iz pletenine z oranžnim trakom, ki prekriva prstni del, je Splošno sodišče odločilo, da ni dokazov, da bi zadevni potrošnik pobarvani prstni del nogavice običajno zaznal kot značaj znamke.
On the contrary, it was considered that this feature would be likely to be perceived as a decorative feature falling within the norms and customs of the market sector.
Dejansko je menilo, da bi upoštevna javnost to lastnost verjetno zaznala kot okrasni element v okviru standardov ali navad v tržnem sektorju.
The Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR objection was therefore maintained.
Zato je bil ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU potrjen.
Buttons are common decorative elements of soft toys.
Gumbi so običajni okrasni elementi mehkih igrač.
A button is a simple geometrical form that does not depart from the norm or customs of the sector.
Gumb je preprosta geometrijska oblika, ki ne odstopa od standarda ali navad v sektorju.
It is not uncommon to attach badges, rings, ribbons, loops and embroidery to the ears of a soft toy.
Pritrjevanje značk, obročkov, trakov, pentelj in vezenin na ušesa mehkih igrač ni neobičajno.
The relevant public will therefore perceive the two signs applied for as ornamental elements but not as an indication of commercial origin.
Upoštevna javnost bo zato zaznala oba znaka, za katera je vložena prijava, kot okrasna elementa, in ne kot označbo trgovskega izvora.
16/01/2014, T433/12, Knopf im Stofftierohr, EU:T:2014:8 & 16/01/2014, T434/12, Fähnchen im Stofftierohr, EU:T:2014:6
16/01/2014, T433/12, Knopf im Stofftierohr, EU:T:2014:8 in 16/01/2014, T434/12, Fähnchen im Stofftierohr, EU:T:2014:6
Sign Description Case No
Znak Opis Št. zadeve
Class 25 Description: the trade mark is a position mark.
Razred 25 Opis: blagovna znamka je pozicijska znamka.
It consists of a figurative element placed on the outer surface of the upper part of a shoe, extending lengthwise from the centre of the cuff of the shoe down to the sole.
Sestavlja jo figurativni element na zunanji površini vrhnjega dela čevlja, ki sega od srede dela na gležnju do podplata.
In general, a mark consisting of a decorative pattern that is simple and commonplace is considered devoid of any element that could attract the consumers' attention, and insufficient to indicate the source or origin of goods or services.
Na splošno se šteje, da znamka, sestavljena iz preprostega in običajnega okrasnega vzorca, nima nikakršnih elementov, ki bi lahko pritegnili pozornost potrošnikov, in da ne zadostuje za označbo izvora ali porekla blaga ali storitev.
The above pattern mark was a textile pattern and therefore considered to comprise the appearance of the goods itself, as the mark was applied for in Classes 18, 24 and 25. 19
Zadevna znamka z vzorcem je vsebovala tekstilni vzorec, zato se je štelo, da prikazuje videz blaga, ker je bila prijava zanjo vložena za razrede 18, 24 in 25. 19
In this case of an application for tyres, the relevant consumer would perceive the mark as merely a representation of the grooves of a tyre, and not an indication of source of origin.
Upoštevni potrošniki bi znamko v tem primeru uporabe za pnevmatike zaznali le kot predstavitev žlebov na pnevmatiki, in ne kot označbo izvora.
Examiner's decision without BOA case
Blagovna znamka EU št.
EUTM No 9 526 261, filed as a figurative mark (Series of stylised V letters), claiming goods in Classes 16, 18 and 25 The mark was rejected for Classes 18 and 25.
9 526 261, za katero je bila vložena prijava za figurativno znamko (zaporedje stiliziranih črk V) za blago iz razredov 16, 18 in 25 Znamka je bila zavrnjena za razreda 18 in 25.
It was accepted for Class 16.
Sprejeta je bila za razred 16.
Though the sign was described as a ‘series of stylised V letters', the sign would most probably be perceived by the relevant public either as a series of zigzag stitching or as a set of rhomboidal geometric figures.
Čeprav je bil znak opisan kot „zaporedje stiliziranih črk V“, bi ga upoštevna javnost najverjetneje zaznala kot zaporedje cikcak šivov ali skupino romboidnih geometrijskih likov.
EUTM No 3 183 068, filed as a figurative mark, for goods in Classes 19 and 21 The mark, which was to be applied to glass surfaces, was refused under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR.
3 183 068, za katero je bila vložena prijava za figurativno znamko za blago iz razredov 19 in 21 Znamka, ki naj bi se uporabljala za steklene površine, je bila zavrnjena na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
It was reasoned that the relevant consumer is not used to perceiving designs applied to glass surfaces as an indication of origin and that the design is recognisable as a functional component to make the glass opaque.
Obrazloženo je bilo, da upoštevni potrošnik vzorcev na površini stekla ni navajen zaznavati kot označb izvora in da je vzorec prepoznaven kot funkcionalen element za doseganje neprosojnosti stekla.
09/10/2002, T36/01, Glass Pattern, § 26-28
Blagovna znamka EU št.
EUTM No 10 144 848, filed as a figurative mark for goods in Classes 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 20 and 21 The mark was refused as it is composed of very simple elements and is a basic and banal sign as a whole.
10 144 848, za katero je bila vložena prijava za figurativno znamko za blago iz razredov 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 16, 18, 20 in 21 Znamka je bila zavrnjena, ker je sestavljena iz zelo preprostih elementov in je kot celota osnoven in vsakdanji znak.
For the claimed goods, such as cleaning cloths and antiseptic wipes, the sign applied for can represent their appearance in the sense that the fabric used may have this structure.
Za zadevno blago, kot so krpe za čiščenje in brisačke z antiseptikom, lahko znak, za katerega je vložena prijava, predstavlja videz blaga, če lahko ima uporabljena tkanina takšno strukturo.
The sign is merely a repetition of identical squares that does not display any element or noticeable variation, in particular in terms of fancifulness or as regards the way in which its components are combined, that would distinguish it from the usual representation of another regular pattern consisting of a different number of squares.
Znak je samo ponovitev enakih kvadratov, ki ne prikazuje nobenega elementa ali opazne razlike, zlasti v smislu domišljije ali načina kombinacije elementov, kar bi ga ločilo od običajne predstavitve nekega drugega pravilnega vzorca, ki vsebuje različno število kvadratov.
Neither the shape of each individual square nor the way they are combined is an immediately noticeable feature that could catch the average consumer's attention and cause the consumer to perceive the sign as a distinctive one.
Niti oblika vsakega posameznega kvadrata niti način kombinacije kvadratov nista hitro opazni lastnosti, ki lahko vzbudita pozornost povprečnega potrošnika, tako da bi ta zaznal razlikovalni učinek znaka.
Classes 16, 18, 25 EUTM No 15 602
Razredi 16, 18 in 25 Blagovna znamka EU št.
Two extremely short blips 9, 38 Machine-generated blip that is commonly emitted by computers and other electronic devices.
Dva zelo kratka visoka tona 9, 38 Visok ton, ki ga povzroči stroj in ga običajno oddajajo računalniki ali druge elektronske naprave.
EUTM No 9 199 167
Blagovna znamka EU št.