natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5.2 Main ingredient 49
5.2 Glavna sestavina 49
5.3 Non-alcoholic beverages (Class 32) versus alcoholic beverages (except beers) (Class 33) 50
5.3 Brezalkoholne pijače (razred 32) v primerjavi z alkoholnimi pijačami (razen piva) (razred 33) 50
5.4 Beers (Class 32), alcoholic beverages (except beers) (Class 33) 50
5.4 Pivo (razred 32) v primerjavi z alkoholnimi pijačami (razen piva) (razred 33) 50
5.5 Provision of food and drinks versus food and drinks 50
5.5 Nudenje hrane in pijače v primerjavi s hrano in pijačo 50
6 Services to Support Other Businesses 51
6 Storitve za zagotavljanje podpore drugim podjetjem 51
7 Retail Services 54
7 Storitve prodaje na drobno 53
7.1 Retail services versus any product 54
7.1 Storitve prodaje na drobno v primerjavi s katerim koli proizvodom 54
7.2 Retail services of specific goods versus same specific goods: similar to a low degree 55
7.2 Storitve prodaje specifičnega blaga na drobno v primerjavi z istim posameznim blagom: nizka stopnja podobnosti 54
7.3 Retail services of specific goods versus different or similar specific goods: dissimilar 55
7.3 Storitve prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno v primerjavi z različnim ali podobnim posameznim blagom: različnost 55
7.4 Retail services versus retail services or retail services of specific goods 55
7.4 Storitve prodaje na drobno v primerjavi z drugimi storitvami prodaje na drobno ali storitvami prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno 55
7.5 Retail services of specific goods versus retail services of other specific goods: similar 55
7.5 Storitve prodaje posameznega blaga na drobno v primerjavi s storitvami prodaje drugega posameznega blaga na drobno: Podobnost 55
7.6 Services to which the same principles apply 56
7.6 Storitve, za katere se uporabljajo enaka načela 55
7.7 Services to which the same principles do not apply 56
7.7 Storitve, za katere se ne uporabljajo enaka načela 55
8 Financial Services 57
8 Finančne storitve 56
8.1 Banking services (Class 36) versus insurance services (Class 36) 57
8.1 Bančništvo (razred 36) v primerjavi z zavarovalniškimi storitvami (razred 36) 57
8.2 Real estate affairs (Class 36) versus financial affairs (Class 36) 57
8.2 Nepremičninski posli (razred 36) v primerjavi s finančnimi storitvami (razred 36) 57
8.3 Credit cards (Class 9) versus financial services (Class 36) 58
8.3 Kreditne kartice (razred 9) v primerjavi s finančnimi storitvami (razred 36) 58
9 Transport, Packaging and Storage 58
9 Transport, pakiranje in skladiščenje blaga 58
9.1 Transport of goods (Class 39) versus any product 58
9.1 Transport blaga (razred 39) v primerjavi s katerim koli proizvodom 58
10.1 Computers versus software 59
10 Informacijska tehnologija 59
10.2 Software versus apparatus that use software 59
10.1 Računalniki v primerjavi s programsko opremo 59
10.3 Software, downloadable ‘apps' and downloadable electronic publications 60
10.2 Programska oprema v primerjavi z aparati, ki uporabljajo programsko opremo 59
10.4 Specific software versus specific software 60
10.3 Programska oprema, naložljive aplikacije in naložljive elektronske publikacije 60
10.5 Computers and software (Class 9) versus computer programming (Class 42) 60
10.4 Posebna programska oprema v primerjavi z drugo posebno programsko opremo 60
10.6 Apparatus for recording, transmission, reproduction of sound or images, computers and software (Class 9) versus telecommunication services (Class 38) 61
10.5 Računalniki in programska oprema (razred 9) v primerjavi z računalniškim programiranjem (razred 42) 60
1.1 Relevance
Ustreznost
The comparison of goods and services is primarily of relevance for the assessment of identity according to Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR and likelihood of confusion according to Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR.
Primerjava blaga in storitev je pomembna zlasti za presojo enakosti v skladu s členom 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in verjetnosti zmede v skladu s členom 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
One of the main conditions for Article 8(1)(a) EUTMR is the identity of goods/services, while Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR requires the identity or similarity of goods/services.
Eden od glavnih pogojev iz člena 8(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je enakost blaga ali storitev, člen 8(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU pa zahteva enakost ali podobnost blaga ali storitev.
Consequently, if all goods/services are found to be dissimilar, one of the conditions contained in Article 8(1) EUTMR is not fulfilled and the opposition must be rejected without addressing the remaining sections of the decision .
Če se za vse blago ali storitve ugotovi, da so različni, to pomeni, da eden od pogojev iz člena 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni izpolnjen in da je treba ugovor zavrniti brez obravnavanja drugih razdelkov odločbe.
[2: Equally, the comparison of goods and services is of relevance in invalidity proceedings, since pursuant to Article 60(1)(a) EUTMR, a registered European Union trade mark is declared invalid where the conditions set out in Article 8(1) EUTMR are fulfilled.]
[2: Prav tako je primerjava blaga in storitev pomembna v postopkih za ugotavljanje ničnosti, saj se v skladu s členom 60(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU registrirana blagovna znamka Evropske unije razglasi za nično, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 8(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.]
The criteria for the assessment of identity or similarity might also play a role when proof of use has been requested and the evidence has to be assessed in order to conclude whether the opponent has proven use for the goods/services as registered.
Merila za presojo enakosti ali podobnosti so lahko ustrezna tudi, če se zahteva dokaz o uporabi, ki ga je treba presoditi, da se ugotovi, ali je vložnik ugovora dokazal uporabo za blago ali storitve, kot so registrirani.
In particular, it is important to determine whether the goods and services for which the mark has been used belong to the category of goods and services for which the trade mark was registered.
Zlasti je treba določiti, ali blago in storitve, za katere se uporablja znamka, spadajo v kategorijo blaga in storitev, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
This is because, under Article 47(2) EUTMR, proof of use for a product or service that is merely similar to the one registered does not prove use for the registered product or service (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use).
V skladu s členom 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se namreč šteje, da dokaz o uporabi za izdelek ali storitev, ki je le podoben oziroma podobna registriranemu izdelku ali storitvi, ne dokazuje uporabe za registrirani izdelek ali storitev (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi).
Likewise, evidence of use of goods/services might also be relevant when examining a claim to enhanced distinctiveness.
Podobno je lahko dokazilo o uporabi blaga ali storitev pomemben tudi pri preizkusu trditve o povečanem razlikovalnem učinku.
In such cases it is often necessary to examine whether the enhanced distinctiveness covers goods/services for which the earlier trade mark enjoys protection and that are relevant for the specific case, that is to say, that have been considered to be identical or similar to the goods/services of the contested EUTM (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 5, Distinctiveness of the Earlier Mark).
V takšnih primerih je pogosto treba preizkusiti, ali povečani razlikovalni učinek vključuje blago ali storitve, ki so zaščitene s prejšnjo blagovno znamko in so pomembne za konkreten primer, to je za katere se je štelo, da so enaki ali podobni blagu ali storitvam izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 5: Razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke).
Furthermore, the outcome of the comparison of goods/services plays an important role in defining the part of the public for whom likelihood of confusion is analysed because the relevant public is that of the goods/services found to be identical or similar (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 3, Relevant Public and Degree of Attention).
Poleg tega je izid primerjave blaga ali storitev pomemben za opredelitev tistega dela javnosti, v zvezi s katerim se analizira verjetnost zmede, saj se upoštevna javnost prouči tudi za blago ali storitve, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da so enaki ali podobni (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 2: Dvojna enakost in verjetnost zmede, poglavje 3: Upoštevna javnost in stopnja pozornosti).
The comparison of goods/services may also be relevant under Article 8(3) EUTMR, which requires the identity or close relation or equivalence in commercial terms of goods/services (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 3, Unauthorised Filing by Agents of the TM Proprietor (Article 8(3) EUTMR)), and under the applicable provisions of national law under Article 8(4) EUTMR, since identity or similarity of the goods/services is often a condition under which the use of a subsequent trade mark may be prohibited (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 4, Rights under Article 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR).
Primerjava blaga ali storitev je lahko pomembna tudi na podlagi člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ki zahteva enakost ali tesno povezanost ali enakovrednost - v komercialnem smislu - blaga ali storitev (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 3: Nepooblaščena vložitev, ki jo opravijo posredniki imetnika blagovne znamke (člen 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)), in veljavnih določb nacionalne zakonodaje v skladu s členom 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ker je enakost ali podobnost blaga ali storitev pogosto pogoj, na podlagi katerega je mogoče prepovedati uporabo poznejše blagovne znamke (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 4: Pravice iz člena 8(4) in (6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Furthermore, under Article 8(5) EUTMR, the degree of similarity or dissimilarity between the goods or services is a factor that must be taken into account when establishing whether or not the consumer will perceive a link between the marks.
Poleg tega je v skladu s členom 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU stopnja podobnosti ali različnosti med blagom ali storitvami dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri opredelitvi, ali bo potrošnik opazil povezavo med znamkama.
For example, the goods or services may be so manifestly dissimilar that use of the later mark on the contested goods or services is unlikely to bring the earlier mark to the mind of the relevant public (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 5, Trade Marks with Reputation (Article 8(5) EUTMR)).
Na primer, blago ali storitve so lahko tako očitno različne, da ni verjetno, da bi uporaba poznejše znamke na izpodbijanem blagu ali storitvah zadevni javnosti priklicala v spomin prejšnjo znamko (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 5: Blagovne znamke z ugledom (člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU)).
1.2 Nice Classification: a starting point
Nicejska klasifikacija: izhodiščna točka
Article 33(1) EUTMR requires that the goods/services to be compared are classified according to the Nice Classification.
V skladu s členom 33(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se blago ali storitve, ki se bodo primerjale, razvrstijo po Nicejski klasifikaciji.
Currently the Nice Classification consists of 34 classes (1-34) for categorising goods and 11 classes (35-45) for categorising services.
Nicejsko klasifikacijo trenutno sestavlja 34 razredov (1-34) za razvrstitev blaga in 11 razredov (35-45) za razvrstitev storitev.
1.2.1 Its nature as a classification tool
Njena narava kot orodje za razvrščanje
The Nice Classification was set up with the aim of harmonising national classification practices.
Cilj vzpostavitve Nicejske klasifikacije je bil uskladiti nacionalne prakse razvrščanja.
Its first edition entered into force in 1961.
Njena prva izdaja je začela veljati leta 1961.
Although it has undergone several revisions, it sometimes lags behind the rapid changes in product developments in the markets.
Čeprav je bila večkrat revidirana, včasih zaostaja za hitrimi spremembami v razvoju proizvodov na trgih.
Furthermore, the wording of the headings is at times unclear and imprecise.
Poleg tega je besedilo naslovov razredov včasih nejasno in nenatančno.
The Nice Classification serves purely administrative purposes and, as such, does not in itself provide a basis for drawing conclusions as to the similarity of goods and services.
Nicejska klasifikacija se uporablja izključno v upravne namene in kot taka sama po sebi ne zagotavlja podlage za sprejemanje končnih ugotovitev glede podobnosti blaga in storitev.
According to Article 33(7) EUTMR, the fact that goods or services are listed in the same class of the Nice Classification is not, in itself, an indication of similarity.
V skladu s členom 33(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU dejstvo, da so blago ali storitve navedene v istem razredu Nicejske klasifikacije, samo po sebi ne kaže na podobnost.
Examples
Primera
Live animals are dissimilar to flowers (Class 31).
Žive živali se razlikujejo od cvetja (razred 31).
Advertising is dissimilar to office functions (Class 35).
Oglaševanje se razlikuje od pisarniških poslov (razred 35).
The fact that two specific goods/services fall under the same general indication of a class heading does not per se make them similar, let alone identical: cars and bicycles - although both fall under vehicles in Class 12 - are considered dissimilar.
Dejstvo, da zadevna izdelka ali storitvi spadata pod isto splošno označbo naslova razreda, samo po sebi ne kaže na njuno podobnost, kaj šele enakost: avtomobili in kolesa - čeprav spadajo pod vozila v razredu 12 - se štejejo za različne.
Furthermore, goods/services listed in different classes are not necessarily considered dissimilar (16/12/2008, T259/06, Manso de Velasco, EU:T:2008:575, § 30-31).
Poleg tega ni nujno, da se blago ali storitve, navedene v različnih razredih, štejejo za različne (16/12/2008, T259/06, Manso de Velasco, EU:T:2008:575, § 30-31).
Meat extracts (Class 29) are similar to spices (Class 30).
Mesni ekstrakti (razred 29) so podobni začimbam (razred 30).
Travel arrangement (Class 39) is similar to providing temporary accommodation (Class 43).
Organizacija potovanj (razred 39) je podobna nudenju začasne nastanitve (razred 43).
1.2.2 Its structure and methodology
Njena struktura in metodologija
Classification may serve as a tool to identify the common characteristics of certain goods/services.
Razvrstitev se lahko uporablja kot orodje za opredelitev skupnih značilnosti nekaterega blaga ali storitev.
Many classes of the Nice Classification are structured according to factors such as function, composition and/or purpose of use, which may be relevant in the comparison of goods/services.
Številni razredi Nicejske klasifikacije so strukturirani po dejavnikih, kot so funkcija, sestava in/ali namen uporabe, ki so lahko pomembni pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev.
Class 1 comprises chemical goods based primarily on their chemical properties (nature), rather than on their specific application.
V razred 1 so vključeni kemični proizvodi, prvenstveno na podlagi njihovih kemijskih lastnosti (narave), in ne na podlagi njihove specifične uporabe.
By contrast, Class 3 covers all items that are either cleaning preparations or for personal hygiene or beautification.
Nasprotno pa razred 3 vključuje vse proizvode, ki so ali čistila ali izdelki za osebno higieno ali ličila.
Although they can by their nature also be classified as chemical products, it is their specific purpose that allows a distinction and thus a different classification.
Čeprav bi jih bilo mogoče po njihovi naravi uvrstiti tudi kot kemične proizvode, njihov točno določen namen omogoča razlikovanje in tako različno razvrstitev.
Equally, it is because of their nature that most items made of leather are classified in Class 18, whereas clothing made of leather falls under Class 25 since it serves a very specific purpose, namely that of being worn by people and as protection from the elements.
Podobno je večina izdelkov iz usnja zaradi svoje narave uvrščena v razred 18, oblačila iz usnja pa spadajo v razred 25, ker se uporabljajo za zelo specifični namen, in sicer da jih nosijo ljudje in da zagotavljajo zaščito pred neugodnimi vremenskimi razmerami.
1.2.3 Conclusions to be drawn from the structure of the Nice Classification
Končne ugotovitve glede strukture Nicejske klasifikacije
The structure of the class headings is not uniform and does not follow the same logic.
Struktura naslovov razredov ni enotna in ne temelji na isti logiki.
Some classes consist of only one general indication that by definition already covers nearly all the goods/services included in this class (Class 15 musical instruments; Class 38 telecommunications).
Nekatere razrede sestavlja samo ena splošna označba, ki že po definiciji vključuje skoraj vse blago ali storitve iz tega razreda (razred 15 glasbeni instrumenti, razred 38 telekomunikacije).
Others include many general indications - some very broad and others very specific.
Drugi razredi vključujejo veliko splošnih označb; nekatere so zelo široke, druge pa zelo specifične.
For example, the heading of Class 9 includes more than 30 terms, ranging from scientific apparatus and instruments to fire-extinguishing apparatus.
Na primer, naslov razreda 9 vključuje več kot 30 izrazov, vse od znanstvenih aparatov in instrumentov do gasilnih aparatov.
Exceptionally, there are class headings containing general indications that include another general indication and are thus identical.
Izjeme so naslovi razredov s splošnimi označbami, ki zajemajo drugo splošno označbo in so tako enaki.
Example: materials for dressing in Class 5 include plasters in Class 5.
Primer: materiali za obveze v razredu 5 vključujejo obliže iz razreda 5.
Other specific indications in a class heading are only mentioned to clarify that they do not belong to another class.
Druge specifične označbe v naslovu razreda so navedene le za pojasnitev, da ne spadajo v drug razred.
Example: adhesives used in industry are included in chemicals used in industry in Class 1.
Primer: lepila za uporabo v industriji so vključena v kemikalije, ki se uporabljajo v industriji v razredu 1.
Its mention is mainly thought to distinguish them from adhesives classified in Class 16, which are for stationery or household purposes.
Navedena so zlasti zato, da jih je mogoče razlikovati od lepil, uvrščenih v razred 16, za pisarniške ali gospodinjske namene.
To conclude, the Nice Classification gives indications that can be used in the assessment of identity or similarity of goods/services.
Končna ugotovitev je tako naslednja: Nicejska klasifikacija vsebuje označbe, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti pri presoji enakosti ali podobnosti blaga ali storitev.
However, its structure and content is not consistent.
Vendar njena struktura in vsebina nista dosledni.
Therefore, each heading or specific term has to be analysed according to the specific class under which it is classified.
Zato je treba vsak naslov ali posamezen izraz analizirati v skladu z določenim razredom, v katerega je uvrščen.
As stated before, the Nice Classification mainly serves to categorise goods/services for administrative purposes and is not decisive for their comparison.
Kot je bilo že navedeno, se Nicejska klasifikacija uporablja zlasti za razvrščanje blaga ali storitev v upravne namene in ni odločilna za njihovo primerjavo.
1.2.4 Changes in the classification of goods/services
Spremembe v razvrstitvi blaga ali storitev
Normally, each revision of the Nice Classification brings changes in the classification of goods/services (in particular transfers of goods/services between various classes) or in the wording of headings.
Z vsako revizijo Nicejske klasifikacije se običajno spremeni razvrstitev blaga ali storitev (zlasti v obliki prenosa blaga ali storitev med različnimi razredi) ali besedilo naslovov.
In such cases the list of goods/services of both the earlier and the contested mark must be interpreted according to the edition of the Nice Classification in force at the time of filing.
V takšnih primerih je treba seznam blaga in/ali storitev prejšnje in izpodbijane znamke razlagati v skladu z izdajo Nicejske klasifikacije, ki se uporablja ob vložitvi prijave.
Legal services were transferred from Class 42 to Class 45 with the 8th edition of the Nice Classification.
Pravne storitve so bile v osmi izdaji Nicejske klasifikacije prenesene iz razreda 42 v razred 45.
The nature of these services has not changed.
Narava teh storitev se ni spremenila.
Vending machines were transferred from Class 9 to Class 7 in the 10th edition of the Nice Classification, since a vending machine is basically a powered machine and as such was considered more appropriately classified in Class 7 with other machinery.
V deseti izdaji Nicejske klasifikacije so bili prodajni avtomati iz razreda 9 preneseni v razred 7, saj je prodajni avtomat v bistvu stroj na pogon in se je v zvezi z njim kot takim štelo, da ga je ustrezneje razvrstiti v razred 7 z drugimi stroji.
However, since the nature of these goods has not changed, vending machines classified in different classes due to the different filing dates of the respective applications are regarded as identical.
Ker pa se narava tega blaga ni spremenila, se šteje, da so prodajni avtomati, ki so zaradi različnih datumov vložitve zadevnih prijav razvrščeni v različne razrede, enaki.
1.3 The Similarity Tool (EUIPN) for the comparison of goods/services
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti (EUIPN) za primerjavo blaga ali storitev
The Similarity Tool for the comparison of goods and services is a search tool to help and support examiners in assessing the similarity of goods and services.
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti za primerjavo blaga in storitev je iskalno orodje, ki preizkuševalcem zagotavlja pomoč in podporo pri presoji podobnosti blaga in storitev.
The Similarity Tool serves to harmonise practice on the assessment of similarity of goods and services and to guarantee the coherence of opposition decisions.
Uporablja se za usklajevanje prakse pri presoji podobnosti blaga in storitev ter za zagotavljanje skladnosti odločb o ugovoru.
The Similarity Tool must be followed by examiners.
Preizkuševalci ga morajo upoštevati.
The Similarity Tool is based on comparing specific pairs of goods and services.
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti temelji na primerjavi posameznih parov blaga in storitev.
A ‘pair' compares two ‘terms'.
„Par“ se primerja z dvema „izrazoma“.
A ‘term' consists of a class number from the Nice Classification (1-45) and a textual element, that is to say, a specific product or service (including general categories of goods and services, such as clothing or education).
„Izraz“ sestavljata številka razreda iz Nicejske klasifikacije (od 1 do 45) in besedni element, to je posamezni proizvod ali storitev (vključno s kategorijami blaga in storitev, kot so na primer oblačila ali izobraževanje).
There are five possible results of the search: identity, high degree of similarity, similarity, low degree of similarity and dissimilarity.
V zbirki je pet možnih rezultatov iskanja: enakost, visoka stopnja podobnosti, podobnost, nizka stopnja podobnosti in različnost.
For each of the degrees of similarity, the tool indicates which criteria lead to each result.
V orodju se za vsako stopnjo podobnosti prikažejo merila, ki so privedla do vsakega rezultata.
The Similarity Tool is constantly updated and revised as necessary in order to create a comprehensive and reliable source of reference.
Orodje za ugotavljanje podobnosti se stalno posodablja in po potrebi revidira, da bi se ustvaril izčrpen in zanesljiv referenčni vir.
Since the tool gives, or will give, answers to specific comparisons, the Guidelines concentrate on defining the general principles and their application in practice.
Ker orodje zagotavlja ali bo zagotavljalo odgovore na posamezne primerjave, je v Smernicah posebna pozornost namenjena opredelitvi splošnih načel in njihovi uporabi v praksi.
1.4 Definition of goods and services (terminology)
Opredelitev blaga in storitev (terminologija)
1.4.1 Goods
Blago
The EUTMR does not give a definition of goods and services.
Uredba o blagovni znamki EU ne vsebuje opredelitve blaga in storitev.