natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Equally, on the invoices produced by the intervener reference is made to the term “cristal” with the mention “1990 coffret”.
Enako se na računih intervenienta navaja samo izraz ,cristal‘ skupaj z navedbo ,škatla 1990‘.
It should be noted that the mark CRISTAL thus identifies the product marketed by the intervener' (para. 35).
Treba je poudariti, da znamka CRISTAL tako določa proizvod, ki ga trži intervenient“ (točka 35).
‘As regards the mention “Louis Roederer” on the main label, it merely indicates the name of the manufacturer's company, which may provide a direct link between one or more product lines and a specific undertaking.
„Navedba ,Louis Roederer‘, ki se pojavlja na glavni označbi, preprosto označuje firmo proizvajalca, kar lahko vzpostavi neposredno vez med eno ali več vrst proizvodov in določenim podjetjem.
The same reasoning applies to the group of letters “lr”, which represents the initials of the intervener's name.
Enako utemeljevanje velja za črki ,lr‘, ki predstavljata začetnici imena intervenienta.
As pointed out by [the Office], joint use of those elements on the same bottle does not undermine the function of the mark CRISTAL as a means of identifying the products at issue' (para. 36).
Kot je navedel [Urad], hkratna uporaba teh elementov na isti buteljki ne pomeni kršitve funkcije identifikacije, ki jo ima znamka CRISTAL z vidika zadevnih proizvodov“ (točka 36).
‘Furthermore, [the Office's] finding that the use of the word mark together with the geographical indication “Champagne” cannot be considered to be an addition capable of altering the distinctive character of the trade mark when used for champagne must be endorsed.
„Poleg tega je treba potrditi presojo [Urada], na podlagi katere uporabo besedne znamke skupaj z geografsko navedbo ,Champagne‘ ni mogoče šteti za dodatek, ki bi lahko spreminjal razlikovalni učinek znamke, ker se le-ta uporablja za šampanjec.
In the wine sector the consumer is often particularly interested in the precise geographical origin of the product and the identity of the wine producer, since the reputation of such products often depends on whether the wine is produced in a certain geographical region by a certain winery' (para. 37).
Dejansko ima potrošnik na področju vina pogosto poseben interes v zvezi z natančnim geografskim izvorom proizvoda in identitete proizvajalca vina, ker je ugled teh proizvodov pogosto povezan z dejstvom, da jih določeno vinogradniško podjetje pridela na določenem geografskem področju“ (točka 37).
L.114 is a French trade mark registered for pharmaceutical products in Class 5.
L.114 je francoska blagovna znamka, registrirana za farmacevtske proizvode iz razreda 5.
The Court found that: 1) the missing full-stop between the capital letter ‘L' and the number 114 constituted a minor difference that did not deprive earlier mark L.114 of its distinctive character (para. 53).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je: manjkajoča pika med veliko črko „L“ in številko 114 majhna razlika, ki prejšnji znamki L.114 ne odvzema razlikovalnega značaja (točka 53).
2) ‘Lehning' was the house mark.
„Lehning“ je bila krovna znamka.
YGAY YGAY together with a number of other verbal and figurative elements 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai
YGAY YGAY skupaj z več drugimi besednimi in figurativnimi elementi 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; potrjena 21/09/2010, i Gai, T546/08
In the Board's decision (confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) it was pointed out that the trade mark YGAY appears in many photographs on both the label and the box in which the bottle is sold.
V odločbi odbora za pritožbe (ki jo je Sodišče potrdilo v sodbi 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) je bilo poudarjeno, da se blagovna znamka YGAY pojavlja na številnih fotografijah na etiketi in škatli, v kateri se prodaja buteljka.
On the labels, the trade mark in question is separated from the other elements.
Zadevna blagovna znamka je na etiketi ločena od drugih elementov.
On some labels, it appears on its own, beneath the phrase MARQUES DE MURRIETA, written in large bold letters.
Na nekaterih etiketah se pojavlja sama pod izrazom MARQUES DE MURRIETA, napisanim z velikimi črkami v krepkem tisku.
On others, the phrase BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA is written in small letters in the upper part, while the elements CASTILLO YGAY are written in large, stylised letters across the label.
Na drugih etiketah je izraz BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA napisan z malimi črkami na zgornjem delu etikete, elementa CASTILLO YGAY pa sta napisana z velikimi stiliziranimi črkami po celotni dolžini etikete.
The trade mark YGAY also appears on its own or together with the phrase CASTILLO YGAY on the boxes in which the bottles are sold.
Blagovna znamka YGAY se sama ali skupaj z izrazom CASTILLO YGAY pojavlja tudi na škatlah, v katerih se prodajajo buteljke.
Levi Strauss is the proprietor of the two EUTMs reproduced above.
Levi Strauss je imetnik dveh zgoraj prikazanih blagovnih znamk EU.
The Court found that the condition of ‘genuine use' may be fulfilled where an EU figurative mark is used only in conjunction with an EU word mark that is superimposed over it, and the combination of those two marks is, furthermore, itself registered as a European Union trade mark, to the extent that the differences between the form in which the trade mark is used and that in which it was registered do not change the distinctive character of the trade mark as registered.
2. Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je pogoj resne in dejanske uporabe lahko izpolnjen, kadar se figurativna znamka EU uporablja le skupaj z besedno znamko EU, ki prekriva figurativno znamko, in je kot blagovna znamka registrirana kombinacija obeh znamk, če razlike med obliko, v kateri se blagovna znamka uporablja, in obliko, v kateri je bila registrirana, ne spremenijo razlikovalnega značaja blagovne znamke, kakor je bila registrirana.
Specsavers commenced proceedings for trade mark infringement and passing off on the basis of the earlier EUTM SPECSAVERS (word mark), as well as the figurative signs , and , against ASDA, a supermarket chain, which relaunched its optical business and targeted Specsavers in its marketing campaign.
Družba Specsavers je sprožila postopek za kršitev blagovne znamke in zavajajoče označevanje na podlagi prejšnje blagovne znamke EU SPECSAVERS (besedna znamka) ter kršitev figurativnih znakov , in zoper družbo ASDA, verigo supermarketov, ki se je začela spet ukvarjati z optično dejavnostjo in je svojo oglaševalsko kampanjo usmerila zoper družbo Specsavers.
Specsavers used its black and white registrations in colour and acquired reputation in the UK for the colour green, using its sign as follows: .
Družba Specsavers je svoje črno-bele registracije uporabljala v barvi in v Združenem kraljestvu pridobila ugled za zeleno barvo, pri čemer je uporabljala prikazani znak: .
ASDA also acquired reputation in the UK for another shade of green in its supermarket business and applied it to the optical business: .
Tudi družba ASDA je v Združenem kraljestvu v okviru svoje dejavnosti supermarketov pridobila ugled za neki drug odtenek zelene barve, ki ga je uporabljala tudi v svoji optični dejavnosti: .
The Court found that the use of with the superimposed word sign may be considered genuine use of the wordless logo mark to the extent that the wordless logo mark as registered always refers in that form to the goods of the Specsavers group (to be determined by the referring court) (para. 24).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je uporabo znaka , ki ga prekriva besedni znak, mogoče šteti za resno in dejansko uporabo znamke z brezbesednim logotipom, če navedena znamka, kakor je bila registrirana, v tej obliki vedno napotuje na proizvode skupine Specsavers“ (kar mora presoditi predložitveno sodišče) (točka 24).
The Board of Appeal regarded the presentation of the two words as the use of two separate marks, since the evidence submitted by the opponent showed that one of them was an old brand of the opponent with its own identity and was present on the market with a number of accompanying signs, as is common practice in the labelling of the specific products (wine).
Odbor za pritožbe je menil, da prikaz dveh besed pomeni uporabo dveh ločenih znamk, saj je bilo iz dokazov, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, razvidno, da je bila ena od njih stara blagovna znamka vložnika ugovora s svojo identiteto in da je bila prisotna na trgu z več spremljevalnimi znaki, kar je običajna praksa pri označevanju posebnih proizvodov (vina).
‘“DUBOIS” and “MINUTO” are separate marks that are affixed together in the concrete product, as is common practice in the labelling of wine products (name of the winery and name of the product).
„DUBOIS in MINUTO sta ločeni znamki, ki sta skupaj nameščeni na konkreten proizvod, kar je običajna praksa pri označevanju proizvodov vinskega sektorja (ime vinske kleti in ime proizvoda).
As regards Spanish brands, see for example “TORRES” - “Sangre de Toro”, “TORRES” - “Acqua d'Or”.
V zvezi s španskimi znamkami glej na primer TORRES - Sangre de Toro in TORRES - Acqua d'Or.
When asking for “MINUTO” wine, the relevant consumer will be aware that such wine is included within the line of products “DUBOIS”, however, “MINUTO” will be perceived as a trade mark of its own, even if it may appear next to the sign ”DUBOIS” in the invoices, brochures and/or product labels' (para. 18).
Kadar upoštevni potrošnik zahteva vino MINUTO, se zaveda, da je takšno vino del linije proizvodov DUBOIS, vendar se bo izraz MINUTO dojemal kot neodvisna blagovna znamka, tudi če se pojavi poleg znaka DUBOIS na računih, v brošurah in/ali na etiketah proizvodov“ (točka 18).
The General Court confirmed that the use of the mark Coloris with additional word elements such as ‘global coloring concept' or ‘gcc' did not alter its distinctive character because the additional elements were merely used together with the mark Coloris and positioned below it and were of such a size that they were not predominant in the mark.
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo, da uporaba znamke Coloris z dodatnimi besednimi elementi, kot sta „global coloring concept ali „gcc, ni spremenila njenega razlikovalnega značaja, saj so se dodatni elementi uporabljali le skupaj z znamko Coloris in so bili nameščeni pod njo, njihova velikost pa je bila takšna, da v znamki niso bili prevladujoči.
The Court indicated that ‘the fact that, in that newspaper article, the names of the funds are composed of the term “halder”, to which a number in Roman numerals has been added, is not such as to call into question the conclusion on use of the mark, since, because of their brevity, their weak distinctive character and their ancillary position, those additions do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered' (para. 58).
Sodišče je navedlo, da dejstvo, da so imena skladov v navedenem časopisnem članku sestavljena iz izraza halder, ki mu je dodana rimska številka, ne vzbuja dvomov glede ugotovitve o uporabi znamke, saj ti dodatki zaradi svoje kratkosti, šibkega razlikovalnega značaja in akcesornega položaja ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke v obliki, v kateri je bila registrirana“ (točka 58).
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; confirmed 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; potrjena 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
The figurative signs reproduced in the evidence of use contain the distinctive elements of the earlier mark and those elements are clearly visible on the labels.
Figurativni znaki, prikazani v dokazih o uporabi, vsebujejo razlikovalne elemente prejšnje znamke, ki so jasno vidni na etiketah.
The inversion of the figurative and word elements of the sign and the additional indication of the respective appellation of origin (Soave, Soave Superiore and Chianti) do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark, which appears reproduced in the sign with all its distinctive elements.
Zamenjava položaja figurativnega in besednega elementa znaka in dodatna navedba zadevne označbe porekla (Soave, Soave Superiore in Chianti) ne spreminjata razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, saj se zdi, da znak vsebuje vse njene razlikovalne elemente.
Consumers of wines are particularly interested in knowing the precise geographical origin of these products; however, the addition of this information about the geographical origin of the goods is not capable of altering the distinctive character of a trade mark in its essential function of identifying a particular commercial origin (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
Potrošniki vin želijo še zlasti poznati natančno geografsko poreklo teh proizvodov; vendar dodatek teh informacij o geografskem poreklu blaga ne more spremeniti razlikovalnega značaja blagovne znamke v zvezi z njeno bistveno funkcijo, ki je označevanje določenega trgovskega izvora (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
The Court stated that the term ‘line', synonymous with the German word ‘Linie', is commonly used in advertising and business in relation to a product line.
Sodišče je navedlo, da se angleški izraz „line“ (linija), katerega ustreznik v nemščini je „Linie“, v oglaševanju in trgovanju pogosto uporablja v zvezi z linijo proizvodov.
It is likely to be perceived automatically as an additional element by the average consumer, particularly in Germany.
Verjetno je, da ga bo povprečni potrošnik samodejno dojemal kot dodatni element, zlasti v Nemčiji.
The Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the term ‘line' did not alter the distinctive character of the disputed mark and that use of this trade mark in combination with this term was a use of that mark (paras 26-27).
Sodišče se je strinjalo z odborom za pritožbe, da izraz „line“ ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja izpodbijane znamke in da je uporaba te blagovne znamke skupaj s tem izrazom pomenila uporabo navedene znamke (točki 26 in 27).
AINHOA AINHOA in combination with ‘BIO', ‘LUXE', ‘MINERAL PASSION', ‘SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE' or 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
AINHOA AINHOA v kombinaciji z „BIO“, „LUXE“, „MINERAL PASSION“, „SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE“ ali 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
The figurative element consists of a square representing the sky, with clouds concentrated in the lower part of the square.
Figurativni element je sestavljen iz kvadrata, ki ponazarja nebo, z oblaki, ki so skoncentrirani v spodnjem delu kvadrata.
The use of the figurative element must be regarded as an acceptable variation of the contested mark.
Uporabo figurativnega elementa je treba šteti za sprejemljivo različico izpodbijane znamke.
Furthermore, the elements added, such as, ‘bio', ‘luxe', ‘mineral passion' or ‘spa world chocolate', are descriptive of the characteristics of the goods.
Poleg tega dodani elementi, kot so „bio“, „luxe“, „mineral passion“ ali „spa world chocolate“, opisujejo značilnosti blaga.
The element ‘bio' may easily be perceived as an abbreviation of the term ‘biological' and refers to the origin or composition of the goods concerned.
Element „bio“, ki bi se lahko zlahka dojemal za okrajšavo izraza biološki, se nanaša na izvor ali sestavo zadevnega blaga.
The term ‘mineral' describes the components of the goods in question as minerals are commonly used in cosmetics.
Izraz „mineral“ opisuje sestavine zadevnega blaga, saj se minerali pogosto uporabljajo v kozmetiki.
In addition, the word ‘spa' has a particular meaning with regard to health and wellness establishments.
Poleg tega ima beseda „spa“ poseben pomen v zvezi z obrati za zdravje in dobro počutje.
Finally, the word ‘luxe' is intended to describe the range of goods in question.
Nazadnje, z besedo „luxe“ naj bi se opisovala vrsta zadevnega blaga.
Consequently, such additional elements do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (paras 30-32).
Zato takšni dodatni elementi ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke (točke od 30 do 32).
The use of the earlier mark ‘PELASPAN-PAC' without the hyphen connecting the elements ‘PELASPAN' and ‘PAC' does not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered and therefore counts for the genuine use assessment.
Uporaba prejšnje znamke „PELASPAN-PAC“ brez vezaja, ki povezuje elementa „PELASPAN“ in „PAC“, ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, kot je registrirana, in jo je zato treba upoštevati pri presoji resne in dejanske uporabe.
‘In the case in hand, and after an examination of the proof submitted, which focuses essentially on the Spanish market, the Board is of the opinion that use of the “TENTATION” registered trade mark through use of the “TENTATIONS” sign does not alter the distinctive character of the original registered trade mark.
Odbor za pritožbe v zadevnem primeru in po proučitvi predloženih dokazov, ki so v bistvu osredotočeni na španski trg, meni, da uporaba registrirane blagovne znamke TENTATION prek uporabe znaka TENTATIONS ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja prvotne registrirane blagovne znamke.
Specifically, the mere addition of the letter “S” to the end of the trade mark does not substantially alter the visual appearance or pronunciation of the registered trade mark and does not create a different conceptual impression on the Spanish market either.
Podrobneje, le dodana črka S na koncu blagovne znamke ne spreminja bistveno videza ali izgovarjave registrirane blagovne znamke in ne ustvarja drugačnega pojmovnega vtisa na španskem trgu.
The trade mark in question will be perceived merely as being in its plural form as opposed to its singular form.
Zadevna blagovna znamka se bo dojemala le kot množinska oblika namesto edninske.
Therefore, said change does not alter the distinctive character of the sign' (para. 17).
Zato ta sprememba ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja znaka (točka 17).
The form used contained the logo plus the words ‘SOCIEDAD LIMITADA' (in small letters) underneath the term ‘SISTEMAS' and/or the ‘E' device with the words ‘epco SISTEMAS, S.L.' in bold 19/01/2009 R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); confirmed 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
Uporabljena oblika je zajemala logotip in besedi „SOCIEDAD LIMITADA“ (z malimi črkami) pod izrazom „SISTEMAS“ in/ali figurativnim elementom „E“ z besedami „epco SISTEMAS, S.L.“ v krepkem tisku 19/01/2009 R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); potrjena 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
‘… these signs are not, as the applicant seems to suggest, significant alterations of the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered' (para. 24).
[…] ta znaka nista - kot se zdi, da trdi vložnik ugovora - pomembni spremembi razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, kot je bila registrirana (točka 24).
‘… whereas the German word “Feriendorf”, meaning “holiday village”, could be perceived as descriptive of the relevant [hotel] services, the same was not true for the word element “panno[n]ia”' (para. 30).
[…] medtem ko bi bilo mogoče nemško besedo Feriendorf, ki pomeni letoviško naselje, dojemati, kot da opisuje ustrezne [hotelske] storitve, to ne velja za besedni element panno[n]ia (točka 30).
Consequently, the addition of the word ‘panno[n]ia' alters the distinctive character of the mark.
Zato dodatek besede „panno[n]ia spremeni razlikovalni značaj znamke.
‘It cannot be considered … that the use of CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE constitutes use of the mark CAPTAIN in a form which does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as registered, since the two signs appear essentially different' (para. 20).
Ni mogoče šteti, […] da uporaba izraza CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE pomeni uporabo znamke CAPTAIN v obliki, ki ne spreminja razlikovalnega značaja znamke, kot je bila registrirana, saj se znaka na videz bistveno razlikujeta (točka 20).
The addition of the semi-circular graphical element does not change the overall impression of the sign (para. 49).
Dodatek polkrožnega grafičnega elementa ne spreminja celotnega vtisa znaka (točka 49).
The figurative elements are only decorative or even negligible and do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (para. 43).
Figurativni elementi so le okrasni ali celo zanemarljivi in ne spreminjajo razlikovalnega značaja znamke (točka 43).
‘[T]his material shows that the respondent's products also contain other elements, in particular a Japanese character within a small circle, which is depicted either above or below the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 19).
Iz tega gradiva je razvidno, da proizvodi tožene stranke zajemajo tudi druge elemente, zlasti japonsko pismenko v majhnem krogu, ki je prikazan nad besedo BIONSEN ali pod nj“ (točka 19).
‘However, in the present case, the combination of the stylised form of the word “BIONSEN” and the Japanese character, independently of whether it is above or under the word “BIONSEN”, constitutes at the most use which differs from the form in which it was registered only in negligible elements.
Vendar v tem primeru kombinacija stilizirane oblike besede BIONSEN in japonske pismenke, ne glede na to, ali prikazana nad besedo BIONSEN ali pod njo, pomeni kvečjemu uporabo, ki se od oblike, v kateri je bila registrirana, razlikuje le v zanemarljivih elementih.
The word “BIONSEN” as used is merely a slight and banal stylisation of the word ‘BIONSEN'.
Beseda BIONSEN, kot se uporablja, je le neznatna in vsakdanja stilizacija besede BIONSEN.
As to the addition of the figurative element in the form of a circular element with a Japanese character, this will hardly be noticed by the average consumer due to its relatively small size and position, either under or on the right side above the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 23).
V zvezi z dodanim figurativnim elementom v obliki okroglega elementa z japonsko pismenko se šteje, da ga bo povprečni potrošnik komaj opazil zaradi njegove razmeroma majhne velikosti in položaja bodisi pod besedo BIONSEN bodisi na desni strani nad njo (točka 23).
The General Court considered that both the registered form of the earlier mark and the form used included the word ‘BUS' and the figurative element of ‘three interlaced triangles'.
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da sta registrirana oblika prejšnje znamke in uporabljena oblika vsebovali besedni element „BUS“ in figurativni element treh prepletenih trikotnikov.
The presentation of the elements is not particularly original or unusual in either form.
Prikaz elementov v nobeni od oblik ni posebej izviren ali neobičajen.
The variation in them does not affect the distinctive character of the trade mark.
Njuna sprememba ne vpliva na razlikovalni značaj blagovne znamke.
As regards the omission of ‘Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
Kar zadeva opustitev izraza „Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
V.', the latter was ‘a string of words, written in small characters and occupying a secondary position, at the bottom of the sign.
V.“, je bil to dolg besedni element, napisan z majhnimi črkami, ki ima drugoten položaj ob vznožju znaka.
Its meaning (Association for the assistance of businessmen and the self-employed, registered association) refers to the services in question.
Ta pomen (združenje za pomoč podjetnikom in samostojnim podjetnikom, prijavljeno združenje) se nanaša na zadevne storitve.
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; confirmed 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; potrjena z dne 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
The Board considered that although in some pieces of evidence the earlier mark did not include the word ‘beachwear', this did not alter the distinctiveness of the earlier mark because it was plainly descriptive of the nature of the goods (t-shirts, beachwear).
Odbor za pritožbe je menil, da čeprav v nekaterih dokazih prejšnja blagovna znamka ni vključevala besede „beachwear“, to ne spreminja razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje blagovne znamke, ker le opisuje naravo blaga (majice s kratkimi rokavi, oblačila za na plažo).
The General Court held: ‘In the present case, the earlier mark is a composite mark, representing a ship's wheel, that is to say, a sign with a rounded shape.
Splošno sodišče je menilo: V tem primeru je prejšnja blagovna znamka sestavljena znamka, ki ponazarja ladijsko krmilo, to je okrogel znak.