natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
During the same period, it also maintained, checked and repaired equipment bearing the Minimax mark itself, used the mark on invoices relating to those services and affixed stickers bearing the mark and strips bearing the words ‘Gebruiksklaar Minimax' (Ready for use Minimax) to the equipment.
V istem obdobju je tudi vzdrževalo, preverjalo in popravljalo opremo, označeno z znamko Minimax, to znamko uporabljalo na računih v zvezi z zadevnimi storitvami ter na opremo namestilo nalepke z znamko in trakove z napisom „Gebruiksklaar Minimax“ (pripravljeno za uporabo Minimax).
Ansul also sold these stickers and strips to undertakings that maintain fire extinguishers.
Poleg tega je te nalepke in trakove prodajalo podjetjem, ki vzdržujejo gasilne aparate.
The evidence submitted by the opponent duly shows that use of the earlier marks for a food additive, namely, zootechnical digestibility enhancer (feed enzyme) was conditional upon prior authorisation, to be issued by the European Food Safety Authority following an application filed before that body.
Dokazi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, ustrezno kažejo, da je bila uporaba prejšnjih blagovnih znamk za aditiv za živilo, in sicer zootehnični pospeševalec prebavljivosti (krmni encim), odvisna od predhodne odobritve, ki jo Evropska agencija za varnost hrane izda po prijavi, ki ji je predložena.
Such a requirement is to be deemed a government requirement in the sense of Article 19(1) TRIPS.
Takšno zahtevo je treba šteti za vladno zahtevo v smislu člena 19(1) sporazuma o TRIPS.
The national [French cancellation] proceedings brought against the opposing trade mark cannot be acknowledged as a proper reason for non-use (para. 19).
Nacionalnega postopka (francoskega postopka izbrisa), ki je bil sprožen zoper blagovno znamko, na kateri temelji ugovor, ni mogoče šteti za upravičen razlog za neuporabo (točka 19).
The fact remains that proper reasons for non-use are only those outside the sphere and influence of the trade mark proprietor, for instance national authorisation requirements or import restrictions.
Dejstvo je, da so upravičeni razlogi za neuporabo samo tisti, ki so zunaj nadzora in vpliva imetnika blagovne znamke, na primer nacionalne zahteve glede odobritve ali uvozne omejitve.
These are neutral with regard to the trade mark to be used; they concern not the trade mark but the goods and services that the proprietor wishes to use.
Z vidika blagovne znamke, ki se bo uporabljala, so nevtralni; ne nanašajo se na blagovno znamko, temveč na blago in storitve, ki jih imetnik želi uporabljati.
Such national authorisation requirements or import restrictions apply to the type or properties of the product to which the trade mark is affixed, and cannot be circumvented by choosing a different trade mark.
Takšne nacionalne zahteve glede odobritve ali uvozne omejitve se nanašajo na vrsto ali lastnosti proizvoda, ki je opremljen z blagovno znamko, in se jim ni mogoče izogniti z izbiro druge blagovne znamke.
In the present case, conversely, the trade mark proprietor could have readily manufactured cigarettes in France or imported them into France if it had chosen a different trade mark (para. 25).
Nasprotno pa bi lahko imetnik blagovne znamke v tem primeru zlahka proizvajal cigarete v Franciji ali jih vanjo uvažal, če bi izbral drugačno blagovno znamko (točka 25).
According to Article 9 EUTMR and Article 5 of the Trade Marks Directive, the trade marks of third parties must not be infringed.
V skladu s členom 9 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in členom 5 Direktive o blagovnih znamkah se ne smejo kršiti blagovne znamke tretjih oseb.
The requirement not to infringe trade marks applies to any person using a name in the course of trade, regardless of whether it has itself applied for or been granted trade mark protection for that name.
Zahteva o nekršitvi blagovnih znamk se uporablja za vsako osebo, ki uporablja ime v gospodarskem prometu, ne glede na to, ali je sama zaprosila za varstvo blagovne znamke za navedeno ime ali ji je bilo to odobreno.
A person refraining from such infringements is acting not for ‘proper reasons' but as ordered by law.
Oseba, ki se vzdrži takšnih kršitev, ne deluje v skladu z upravičenimi razlogi, temveč v skladu s pravom.
Hence, even refraining from use that would otherwise infringe a right is not a proper reason (09/03/2010, R 764/20094, HUGO BOSS / BOSS, § 22) (para. 27).
Zato ni upravičen razlog niti opustitev uporabe, ki bi sicer kršila pravico (09/03/2010, R 764/20094, HUGO BOSS / BOSS, § 22) (točka 27).
Nor is use in such instances ‘unreasonable'.
Poleg tega uporaba v takšnih primerih ni nerazumna.
Persons who, as trade mark proprietors, are threatened with proceedings or an interim injunction if they start using the trade mark concerned, must consider the prospects of the action against them succeeding and can either capitulate (not start using the trade mark) or defend themselves against the complaint.
Osebe, ki jim kot imetnikom blagovne znamke grozi sodni postopek ali začasna prepoved, če začnejo uporabljati zadevno blagovno znamko, morajo razmisliti o možnosti, da bo postopek zoper njih uspešen, in se lahko bodisi vdajo (ne začnejo uporabljati blagovne znamke) bodisi branijo pred pritožbo.
In any event, they have to accept the decision of the independent courts, which may be in expedited proceedings.
Vsekakor morajo sprejeti odločbo neodvisnih sodišč, ki se lahko sprejme po hitrem postopku.
Nor, pending a decision at final instance, can they object that they must be protected by the fact that, until that decision becomes final, uncertainty is to be recognised as a proper reason for non-use.
Poleg tega pred sprejetjem odločbe na zadnji stopnji ne morejo ugovarjati, da morajo biti zaščiteni že na podlagi dejstva, da je treba negotovost priznati za upravičen razlog za neuporabo, dokler zadevna odločba ne postane pravnomočna.
In fact, the issue of what should happen in the period between the filing of an action or the application for an interim injunction and the conclusive final decision is again to be left to the courts, in that they take decisions that are not yet final on provisional enforceability.
Dejansko je treba vprašanje, kaj naj se dogaja v obdobju med sprožitvijo postopka ali vložitvijo zahteve za začasno sodno prepoved in dokončno pravnomočno odločbo, spet prepustiti sodiščem, saj sprejemajo odločitve, ki še niso dokončne glede začasne izvršljivosti.
The defendant is not entitled to ignore those decisions and be put in a position as if there were no courts (para. 28).
Tožena stranka mora upoštevati te odločbe in se ne more vesti, kot da sodišča ne obstajajo (točka 28).
Designated country [9: Malta is not part of the Madrid System.]
Imenovana država [9: Malta ni del Madridskega sistema.]
Country of origin Deadline to issue a refusal
Država izvora Rok za izdajo zavrnitve
EUTM Date of registration.
Blagovna znamka EU Datum registracije
National mark By default, date of registration or of completion of registration proceedings if proven by opponent.
Nacionalna znamka Privzeto datum registracije ali datum zaključka registracijskega postopka, če ga vložnik ugovora dokaže.
IR designating Member States By default, 12 or 18 months after the date of notification from which the time limit to notify the refusal starts (INID code 580).
Mednarodne registracije, v katerih so imenovane države članice Privzeto 12 ali 18 mesecev po datumu obvestila, ko začne teči rok za obvestilo o zavrnitvi (koda INID 580).
Can be earlier or later if proven by parties.
Lahko je zgodnejši ali poznejši, če ga stranki dokažeta.
IR designating the EU Date of the second republication of the EU designation in part M.3. of the Bulletin.
Mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU Datum druge ponovne objave imenovanja EU v delu M.3 Biltena.
17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47 The opponent (Fribo Foods Ltd.) submitted several invoices relating to large quantities of goods, addressed to its distribution company (Plusfood Ltd.), which belongs to the same group (Plusfood Group).
17/02/2011, T324/09, Friboi, EU:T:2011:47 Vložnik ugovora (Fribo Foods Ltd.) je predložil več računov za velike količine blaga, naslovljenih na svoje distribucijsko podjetje (Plusfood Ltd.), ki je del iste skupine (Plusfood Group).
It is not disputed that the distribution company put the products on the market later.
Ni sporno, da je distribucijsko podjetje pozneje dalo proizvode na trg.
Furthermore, the opponent presented undated brochures, a press clip and three price lists.
Vložnik ugovora je poleg tega predložil nedatirane brošure, časopisni izrezek in tri cenike.
With regard to the ‘internal' invoices, the Court held that the producer-distributor-market chain was a common method of business organisation, which could not be regarded as purely internal use.
Sodišče je v zvezi z notranjimi računi odločilo, da je veriga proizvajalec-distributer-trg običajen način poslovne organizacije, ki je ni mogoče šteti za uporabo za povsem notranje namene.
The undated brochures had to be seen in conjunction with other dated evidence such as invoices and price lists and, therefore, might still be taken into consideration.
Nedatirane brošure je bilo treba obravnavati v povezavi z drugimi datiranimi dokazi, kot so računi in ceniki, zato jih je bilo mogoče kljub temu upoštevati.
The Court accepted genuine use and stressed that an overall assessment implied that all the relevant factors be viewed as a whole and not in isolation.
Sodišče je sprejelo resno in dejansko uporabo ter poudarilo, da je treba v okviru celovite presoje vse upoštevne dejavnike obravnavati kot celoto in ne ločeno.
02/05/2011, R 872/20104, CERASIL / CERATOSIL The opponent submitted inter alia about 50 invoices, not in the language of proceedings.
02/05/2011, R 872/20104, CERASIL / CERATOSIL Vložnik ugovora je med drugim predložil približno 50 računov, ki niso bili v jeziku postopka.
The names of the addressees as well as the quantities sold were blacked out.
Podatki o imenih naslovnikov in prodanih količinah so bili zatemnjeni.
The Boards held that standard invoices containing the usual information (date, indication of seller's and buyer's name/address, product concerned, price paid) did not require a translation.
Odbori za pritožbe so odločili, da standardnih računov, ki vsebujejo običajne informacije (datum, navedbo imena/naslova prodajalca in kupca, zadevni proizvod, plačano ceno), ni treba prevesti.
Even though the names of the addressees and the quantities sold were blacked out, the invoices nevertheless confirmed the sale of ‘CERATOSIL' products, measured in kilograms, to companies throughout the relevant territory during the relevant period.
Čeprav so bili podatki o imenih naslovnikov in prodanih količinah zatemnjeni, je bila iz računov kljub temu razvidna prodaja proizvodov „CERATOSIL“, izražena v kilogramih, in sicer podjetjem z upoštevnega ozemlja v upoštevnem obdobju.
Together with the remaining evidence (brochures, affidavit, articles, photographs), this was considered sufficient to prove genuine use.
Upoštevalo se je, da to skupaj s preostalimi dokazi (brošure, zaprisežena izjava, izdelki, fotografije) zadostuje za dokaz o resni in dejanski uporabi.
29/11/2010, B 1 477 670 The opponent, which was active in the field of vehicle maintenance and the management of businesses associated with buying and selling vehicles, provided several Annual Reports giving a general overview of its overall commercial and financial activities.
29/11/2010, B 1 477 670 Vložnik ugovora, ki je bil dejaven na področju vzdrževanja vozil in vodenja podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo z nakupom in prodajo vozil, je predložil več letnih poročil, ki zagotavljajo splošen pregled njegovih skupnih poslovnih in finančnih dejavnosti.
The OD found that these reports, by themselves, did not provide sufficient information on actual use for the majority of services claimed.
Oddelek za ugovore je ugotovil, da ta poročila kot taka ne zagotavljajo zadostnih informacij o dejanski uporabi za večino zadevnih storitev.
However, in conjunction with advertisements and publicity displaying the mark in question for particular services, the OD concluded that the evidence as a whole provided sufficient indications as to the scope, nature, period and place of use for these services.
Vendar je sklenil, da v povezavi z oglasi in reklamami, v katerih je bila prikazana zadevna znamka za posebne storitve, dokazi kot celota zagotavljajo dovolj podatkov o obsegu, naravi, obdobju in kraju uporabe za te storitve.
29/11/2010, R 919/20094, GELITE / GEHOLIT The documents submitted by the appellant showed use of the trade mark for ‘coating materials based on artificial resin (base, intermediate and top coatings) and industrial lacquers'.
29/11/2010, R 919/20094, GELITE / GEHOLIT Iz dokumentov, ki jih je predložil pritožnik, je razvidna uporaba blagovne znamke za premazne materiale na podlagi umetne smole (osnovni, vmesni in prekrivni premazi) ter industrijske lake in firneže.
The attached labels showed use of the trade mark for various base, primer and top coatings.
Priložene etikete so dokazovale uporabo blagovne znamke za različne osnovne, temeljne in prekrivne premaze.
This information coincided with the attached price lists.
Te informacije so bile skladne s priloženimi ceniki.
The associated technical information sheets described the goods as corrosion coatings based on artificial resin, which are offered for sale in various colours.
V povezanih tehničnih listih je bilo to blago opisano kot protikorozijski premazi na podlagi umetne smole, ki se prodajajo v različnih barvah.
The attached invoices showed that these goods were supplied to various customers in Germany.
Iz priloženih računov je bilo razvidno, da je bilo to blago dobavljeno različnim kupcem v Nemčiji.
Although the turnover figures stated in the written declaration in relation to the period from 2002 to 2007 did not expressly refer to Germany, it had to be concluded that they were obtained at least in part also in Germany.
Čeprav se podatki o prometu iz pisne izjave za obdobje 2002-2007 niso nanašali izrecno na Nemčijo, je treba sklepati, da so bili vsaj deloma pridobljeni tudi v Nemčiji.
Consequently, the earlier mark was deemed to be used for the goods lacquer, lacquer paints, varnishes, paints; dispersions and emulsions to coat and repair surfaces because it was not possible to create any further subcategories for these goods.
Zato se šteje, da se prejšnja znamka uporablja za blago laki, lakirne barve, firneži, barve; disperzije in emulzije za prekrivanje in obnovo površin, saj ni mogoče ustvariti dodatnih podkategorij za to blago.
20/04/2010, R 878/20092, SOLEA / Balea The solemn declaration refers to high sales figures (over EUR 100 million) for marked products from 2004 to 2006 and attaches internet extracts of pictures of the products sold during the relevant period (soap, shampoo, deodorant (for feet and body), lotions, and cleaning items).
20/04/2010, R 878/20092, SOLEA / Balea Zaprisežena izjava se nanaša na podatke o velikem obsegu prodaje (nad 100 milijonov EUR) za označene proizvode v obdobju 2004-2006, priloženi pa so ji spletni izvlečki s slikami proizvodov, prodanih v upoštevnem obdobju (milo, šampon, dezodorant (za noge in telo), losjoni in čistilna sredstva).
Although the internet extracts bear a copyright date of 2008, the credibility of what the declaration affirms is reinforced by the judgment of the State Court of Mannheim, a copy of which had been adduced previously by the opponent in order to demonstrate the enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark and which referred to the market share enjoyed by products bearing the opponent's mark for ladies' face care products (6.2 %), caring lotions (6.3 %), shower soaps and shampoos (6.1 %) and men's face care and shaving products (7.9 %).
Čeprav so na spletnih izvlečkih navedene avtorske pravice iz leta 2008, je verodostojnost navedb iz izjave podkrepljena s sodbo deželnega sodišča v Mannheimu, katere kopijo je vložnik ugovora pred tem predložil kot dokaz o povečanem razlikovalnem učinku prejšnje znamke; sodba se je sklicevala na tržni delež proizvodov, označenih z znamko vložnika ugovora, v zvezi z izdelki za nego obraza za ženske (6,2 %), negovalnimi losjoni (6,3 %), mili za prhanje in šamponi (6,1 %) ter izdelki za nego obraza za moške in izdelki za britje (7,9 %).
Moreover, the judgment states that, according to a GfK study, one fifth of German citizens purchase at least one BALEA product per annum.
V sodbi je poleg tega navedeno, da v skladu z ugotovitvami študije GfK petina nemških državljanov kupi vsaj en izdelek BALEA na leto.
Reference is also made to two further studies that demonstrate that the brand is well known in Germany.
Sodba se sklicuje tudi na dve dodatni študiji, ki dokazujeta, da je znamka v Nemčiji znana.
Thus, proof of use for the mark has been demonstrated sufficiently for the products on which the opposition is based.
Zato je bila zadostno dokazana uporaba znamke za proizvode, na katerih temelji ugovor.
The evidence provided to substantiate use of the earlier Danish trade mark appears to be sufficient.
Dokazi, predloženi za utemeljitev uporabe prejšnje danske blagovne znamke, se zdijo zadostni.
The Board is satisfied that the invoice provided shows place and time of use, as it proves the sale to a Danish company of 2 200 cartons of products within the relevant date.
Odbor za pritožbe je zadovoljen, da predloženi račun, iz katerega sta razvidna kraj in čas uporabe, dokazuje prodajo 2 200 kartonskih škatel proizvoda danskemu podjetju v upoštevnem obdobju.
The labels submitted show use on soft drinks bearing the mark as represented on the registration certificate.
Predložene etikete dokazujejo uporabo na brezalkoholnih pijačah, označenih z znamko, kot je bila prikazana na potrdilu o registraciji.
As to the question whether proof consisting of one single invoice is sufficient in terms of extent of use, the content of that invoice, in the context of the remaining pieces of evidence, serves, in the Board's view, to conclude that the use made of the mark in Denmark is sufficient and genuine in connection with aerated water, aerated water with fruit taste and soda water.
Odbor za pritožbe v zvezi z vprašanjem, ali za obseg uporabe zadostuje dokaz, ki vključuje samo en račun, meni, da je mogoče na podlagi vsebine navedenega računa v okviru preostalih dokazov sklepati, da je uporaba znamke na Danskem za gazirano vodo, gazirano vodo z okusom sadja in sodavico zadostna, resna in dejanska.
18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9 The opponent submitted a declaration from the opponent's managing partner and 15 footwear manufacturers that footwear had been produced for the opponent under the trade mark VOGUE over a number of years, 35 photographs of VOGUE footwear models, photographs of stores and 670 invoices issued to the opponent by footwear manufacturers.
18/01/2011, T382/08, Vogue, EU:T:2011:9 Vložnik ugovora je predložil izjavo svojega izvršnega direktorja in 15 proizvajalcev obutve, da se je za vložnika ugovora več let proizvajala obutev pod blagovno znamko VOGUE, 35 fotografij modelov obutve VOGUE, fotografije prodajaln in 670 računov, ki so jih vložniku ugovora izdali proizvajalci obutve.
The Court held that the declarations did not provide sufficient evidence concerning the extent, place and time of use.
Sodišče je menilo, da izjave niso zagotovile zadostnih dokazov o obsegu, kraju in času uporabe.
The invoices concerned the sale of footwear to the opponent, not the sale of footwear to end consumers and, therefore, were not suitable for proving external use.
Računi so se nanašali na prodajo obutve vložniku ugovora, in ne na prodajo obutve končnim potrošnikom, zato niso ustrezni za dokazovanje zunanje uporabe.
Mere presumptions and suppositions (‘highly unlikely', ‘unreasonable to think', ‘… which probably explains the absence of invoices …', ‘reasonable to assume', etc.) cannot replace solid evidence.
Zgolj domneve in predpostavke („zelo malo verjetno“, „nerazumno sklepati“, „[…] kar verjetno pojasnjuje odsotnost računov […]“, „razumno domnevati“ itd.) ne morejo nadomestiti trdnih dokazov.
Therefore, genuine use was denied.
Zato je bila resna in dejanska uporaba zavrnjena.
19/09/2007, 1359 C; confirmed 09/09/2008, R 1764/20074, PAN AM II The owner of the mark owned a US-based airline, operating solely in the US.
19/09/2007, 1359 C; potrjena 09/09/2008, R 1764/20074, PAN AM II Imetnik blagovne znamke je bil lastnik letalske družbe s sedežem v ZDA, ki posluje izključno v ZDA.
The fact that flights could also be booked via internet from the European Union could not alter the fact that the actual services of transportation (Class 39) were rendered exclusively outside the relevant territory.
Dejstvo, da je bilo mogoče lete rezervirati prek spleta iz Evropske unije, ne spremeni dejstva, da so se dejanske prevozniške storitve (razred 39) opravljale izključno zunaj upoštevnega ozemlja.
Furthermore, the lists submitted of passengers with addresses in the European Union could not prove that the flights had actually been booked from Europe.
Poleg tega iz predloženih seznamov potnikov z naslovi v Evropski uniji ni bilo razvidno, da so bili leti dejansko rezervirani iz Evrope.
Finally, the website was exclusively written in English, the prices were in US dollars and the relevant telephone and fax numbers were from within the US.
Nazadnje, spletišče je bilo izključno v angleškem jeziku, cene so bile navedene v ameriških dolarjih, pa tudi ustrezna telefonska številka in številka telefaksa sta bili ameriški.
Therefore, genuine use in the relevant territory was denied.
Zato je bila resna in dejanska uporaba na upoštevnem ozemlju zavrnjena.
04/05/2010, R 966/20092, COAST / GREEN COAST (fig.) et al. There are no special circumstances that might justify a finding that the catalogues submitted by the opponent, on their own or in combination with the website and magazine extracts, prove the extent of use of any of the earlier signs for any of the G&S involved.
04/05/2010, R 966/20092, COAST / GREEN COAST (fig.) et al. Ne obstajajo nikakršne posebne okoliščine, na podlagi katerih bi bilo mogoče ugotoviti, da katalogi, ki jih je predložil vložnik ugovora, sami ali v kombinaciji s spletiščem in odlomki iz revij dokazujejo obseg uporabe katerega koli od prejšnjih znakov za zadevno blago in storitve.
Although the evidence submitted shows use of the earlier sign in connection with clothing for men and women, the opponent did not produce any evidence whatsoever indicating the commercial volume of the exploitation of this sign to show that such use was genuine.
Čeprav je iz predloženih dokazov razvidna uporaba prejšnjega znaka za oblačila za moške in ženske, vložnik ugovora ni predložil nikakršnih dokazov o tržnem obsegu izkoriščanja tega znaka, ki bi pokazali, da je bila takšna uporaba resna in dejanska.
08/06/2010, R 1076/20092, EURO CERT (fig.)/ EUROCERT It is well established in the case-law that a declaration, even if sworn or affirmed in accordance with the law under which it is rendered, must be corroborated by independent evidence.
08/06/2010, R 1076/20092, EURO CERT (fig.)/ EUROCERT Ustaljena sodna praksa je, da mora biti izjava, tudi če je zaprisežena ali overjena v skladu z zakonodajo, na podlagi katere je izdana, podprta z neodvisnimi dokazi.
The declaration in this case, drawn up by an employee of the opponent's company, contains an outline of the nature of the relevant services, but only general statements concerning trade activities.
V tem primeru izjava, ki jo je sestavil zaposleni v podjetju vložnika ugovora, vsebuje opis vrste upoštevnih storitev, vendar le splošne izjave o trgovinskih dejavnostih.
It contains no detailed sales or advertising figures or other data that might show the extent and use of the mark.
Ne vključuje nikakršnih podrobnih podatkov o prodaji ali oglaševanju ali drugih podatkov, ki bi lahko kazali obseg in uporabo blagovne znamke.
Furthermore, a mere three invoices with important financial data blanked out and a list of clients can hardly be considered corroborative evidence.
Poleg tega le treh računov z zatemnjenimi pomembnimi finančnimi podatki in seznama strank ni mogoče šteti za potrditvene dokaze.
Therefore, no genuine use of the earlier mark has been demonstrated.
Zato resna in dejanska uporaba prejšnje blagovne znamke ni bila dokazana.