natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court took the view that, if no colour is claimed in the application, the use of different colour combinations ‘must be allowed, as long as the letters contrast against the background.'
Sodišče je menilo, da če v prijavi ni navedena nobena barva, je treba uporabo različnih barvnih kombinacij dovoliti, če so črke v kontrastu z ozadjem.
The Court also noted that the letters M, A, D were arranged in a particular way in the EUTM.
Poleg tega je ugotovilo, da so črke M, A in D v blagovni znamki EU razporejene po določenem vzorcu.
Accordingly, representations of the sign that do not alter the arrangement of the letters, or the contrast of colour, constitute genuine use (paras 41 and 45).
V skladu s tem prikazi znaka, ki ne spreminjajo razporeditve črk ali barvnega kontrasta, pomenijo resno in dejansko uporabo (točki 41 in 45).
The word element was considered to be the dominant feature of the figurative mark, since it was in a central position and in large letters.
Štelo se je, da je besedni element prevladujoči element figurativne znamke, saj ima osrednji položaj in je napisan z velikimi črkami.
It was considered that the distinctive character was not changed (para. 15).
Poleg tega se je štelo, da razlikovalni značaj ni bil spremenjen (točka 15).
‘The orange background is the colour of packaging of the products.
Oranžno ozadje je barva embalaže proizvodov.
The mark is used in black on a white background, outlined in silver similar to the earlier registered mark.
Znamka se uporablja v črni barvi na belem ozadju, ki je podobno kot v prejšnji registrirani znamki obrobljeno srebrno barvo.
The typeface has been slightly modernised and the small hyphen between “Bi” and “Fi” has been deleted.
Pisava je nekoliko posodobljena, vezaj med Bi in Fi pa je bil odstranjen.
(with word mark John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (AG case)
(z besedno znamko John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (zadeva AG)
‘The colours covered by the application for registration were designated using the Munsell system as: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (green) and 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (yellow).
„Barvi, na kateri se nanaša zahteva za registracijo, sta bili označeni na podlagi Munsellovega sistema: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (zelena) in 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (rumena).
The arrangement is described as being ‘green for the vehicle body and yellow for the wheels', as is shown by a picture attached to the application and reproduced below ' (para. 3).
Opis določa, da je ,trup vozila zelen, kolesa pa rumena‘, kot je prikazano na sliki, priloženi zahtevi in upodobljeni spodaj: ' (točka 3).
‘[A]lthough it is true that the disputed mark was used and promoted in conjunction with the word mark John Deere [underlining added] and that the intervener's advertising expenditure in the European Union was presented as a whole and not individually for each country, the applicant is wrong to claim that it was not proved to the required legal standard that the intervener had used the combination of the colours green and yellow on its goods as a trade mark and that the market penetration of its goods had been deep and long-lasting in all the Member States of the European Union as at 1 April 1996' (para. 46).
„[Č]eprav drži, da je bila izpodbijana blagovna znamka uporabljena in razširjana v povezavi z besedno znamko John Deere in so bili intervenientkini stroški oglaševanja v Evropski uniji predstavljeni v celoti, in ne posamezno za vsako državo članico, tožeča stranka napačno trdi, da ni bilo pravno zadostno dokazano, da je intervenientka kombinacijo zelene in rumene barve na svojih proizvodih uporabljala kot znamko in da je bilo 1. aprila 1996 razširjanje teh proizvodov na trgu temeljito in trajno v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije“ (točka 46).
In this case the use of the mark with a different spelling and the addition of the letter ‘C' alter the distinctive character of the registered sign, because the letters ‘VIT' are now seen as a descriptive element, namely ‘VIT C' (which refers to ‘Vitamin C').
V tem primeru uporaba znamke z drugačnim črkovanjem in dodana črka „C“ spreminjata razlikovalni značaj registriranega znaka, saj se črke „VIT“ zdaj upoštevajo kot opisni element, in sicer „VIT C“ (ki se nanaša na „vitamin C“).
‘[T]he ‘NOVEDADES' catalogues dated 2004-2009 consistently show the mark and only this version.
V katalogih NOVEDADES iz obdobja 2004-2009 je dosledno prikazana blagovna znamka in samo ta različica.
This does not constitute use of the mark [as registered] (with or without colour) as admissible under Article 15(1)(a) CTMR [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR].
To ne pomeni uporabe znamke [kot je bila registrirana] (z barvo ali brez nje), ki je sprejemljiva na podlagi člena 15(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki Skupnosti [zdaj člen 18(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU].
The mere fact that both marks include a word element LLOYD'S is not enough for that purpose, also the figurative elements of the earlier mark must appear in the form as used.
Le dejstvo, da obe znamki vključujeta besedni element LLOYD'S, ne zadostuje za to; tudi figurativni elementi prejšnje znamke morajo biti prikazani v obliki, ki se uporablja.
The form as used is in a different font, lacks the single letter L at the end and surrounded by an orbital device, and lacks the circular or orbital device around the word ‘LLOYD'S'.
Oblika, ki se uporablja, ima drugačno pisavo, saj na koncu nima črke L, obdane z orbitalnim figurativnim elementom, in je brez okroglega ali orbitalnega figurativnega elementa okrog besede LLOYD'S.
In other words, all its figurative elements are missing in the form as used.
Z drugimi besedami, v obliki, ki se uporablja, manjkajo vsi figurativni elementi.
On top, the form as used contains the conspicuous device of a flying bird with a long beak.
Na vrhu oblike, ki se uporablja, je vpadljiv figurativni element leteče ptice z dolgim kljunom.
The omission of all the figurative elements of the mark as registered and the addition of another figurative element does alter, in the form as used, the distinctive character of the mark and is much more than a mere variation or modernisation' (para. 35).
Opustitev vseh figurativnih elementov znamke, kot je bila registrirana, in vključitev dodatnega figurativnega elementa v obliko, ki se uporablja, spremeni razlikovalni značaj znamke in je precej več kot le sprememba ali posodobitev (točka 35).
There are significant differences between the sign used and the earlier mark in its registered form.
Uporabljeni znak je bistveno drugačen od prejšnje blagovne znamke v njeni registrirani obliki.
Those differences are such as to alter, from the perspective of the average French consumer to whom the goods in Class 25 are addressed, the distinctiveness of the earlier mark in its registered form.
Zaradi teh razlik je z vidika povprečnega francoskega potrošnika, ki so mu namenjeni proizvodi iz razreda 25, spremenjen razlikovalni učinek prejšnje blagovne znamke v registrirani obliki.
The differences between the abovementioned mark and sign are not negligible and the mark and sign cannot be regarded as being broadly equivalent within the meaning of the case-law.
Navedene razlike med zgorajnavedeno znamko in znakom niso zanemarljive, zato ju ni mogoče obravnavati kot splošno enakovredna v smislu sodne prakse.
Contested sign Case No
Izpodbijani znak Št. zadeve
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (revocation)
CARRERA 09/09/2009, R 260/20094, (razveljavitev)
The proven use of a trade mark for: decorative lettering; increased performance packages; covers for storage compartments; wheel sets and complete wheel sets for summer and winter; and door sill cover plates was considered sufficient proof of use for motor vehicle and land vehicle parts overall, for which the mark was registered.
Dokazana uporaba blagovne znamke za: okrasno pisavo, pakete za boljšo učinkovitost, pokrove za predelke za shranjevanje, komplete koles in popolne komplete koles za poletje in zimo in zaščitne plošče za pragove se je štela za zadosten dokaz o uporabi za dele motornih in kopenskih vozil na splošno, za katere je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
The main arguments were that it was used for numerous different motor vehicle parts and the goods for which use had been proven thus covered a wide spectrum of motor vehicle parts: elements of the chassis, the bodywork, the engine, the interior design and decorative elements.
Glavne trditve so bile, da se je blagovna znamka uporabljala za številne različne dele motornih vozil, zato je blago, za katero je bila uporaba dokazana, zajemalo širok nabor delov motornih vozil: elemente šasije, karoserijo, motor, notranje oblikovanje in okrasne elemente.
The Court held that ‘polish for metals', which in itself is already a subcategory of the class heading term polishing preparations, is sufficiently precise and narrowly defined in terms of the function and intended purpose of the claimed goods.
Sodišče je odločilo, da je izraz pripravki za poliranje kovin, ki je že sam po sebi podkategorija izraza naslova razreda polirni pripravki, dovolj natančen in omejen v smislu funkcije in namena zadevnega blaga.
No further subcategory can be established without being artificial, and thus, use for the entire category of polish for metals was assumed.
Ker ni mogoče opredeliti nobene nadaljnje podkategorije, ne da bi ta bila umetna, je bila sprejeta uporaba za celotno kategorijo pripravkov za poliranje kovin.
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Revocation
Turbo 19/06/2007, R 378/20062, TURBO Razveljavitev
Thus, the Board found that use of the contested mark had been proved for clothing (para. 22).
Zato je ugotovil, da je bila dokazana uporaba izpodbijane znamke za oblačila (točka 22).
The Board, moreover, found it almost impossible and certainly unduly onerous to impose on the proprietor of a registered EUTM for clothing the obligation to demonstrate use in all possible subcategories that could be endlessly subdivided by the applicant (para. 25).
Poleg tega je ugotovil, da je skoraj nemogoče in prav gotovo zelo neprimerno, če se imetniku registrirane blagovne znamke EU za oblačila naloži obveznost, naj dokaže uporabo v vseh mogočih podkategorijah, ki bi jih lahko vložnik ugovora nenehno nadalje delil na podrazdelke (točka 25).
19/01/2009, R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); confirmed 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
19/01/2009, R 1088/20082, EPCOS (fig.) / E epco SISTEMAS (fig.); potrjena 15/12/2010, T132/09, Epcos
The contested decision considered that the original specification of the earlier mark for measuring apparatus and instruments was a ‘very wide' one, and determined, applying the criteria established in the Aladin judgment, that use had in fact only been shown for a subcategory of goods, namely: measuring apparatus, all being for the measurement of temperature, pressure and level; parts for the aforesaid apparatus.
V izpodbijani odločbi je bilo navedeno, da je prvotna opredelitev prejšnje znamke za merilne aparate in instrumente zelo široka, in na podlagi meril iz sodbe v zadevi Aladin opredeljeno, da je bila uporaba dejansko dokazana za podkategorijo blaga, in sicer za: merilne aparate, vse za merjenje temperature, tlaka in nivoja ter dele navedenih aparatov.
The Board found that approach to be a reasonable one in the circumstances of the case and endorsed the reasoning and findings of the contested decision in this regard (para. 29).
Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil, da je ta pristop glede na okoliščine zadeve razumen, ter potrdil zadevno obrazložitev in ugotovitve iz izpodbijane odločbe (točka 29).
ICEBERG 23/07/2009, R 1166/20081, ICEBERG Revocation
ICEBERG 23/07/2009, R 1166/20081, ICEBERG Razveljavitev
G&S: apparatus for heating, steam generating, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and water supply purposes in Class 11.
Blago in storitve: aparati za ogrevanje, aparati za proizvodnjo pare, aparati za hlajenje, sušenje, prezračevanje in distribucijo vode iz razreda 11.
Assessment of PoU: the Board concluded that the trade mark use was only proven for fridges, freezers and air-conditioning modules for yachts and boats (para. 26).
Presoja dokaza o uporabi: Odbor za pritožbe je sklenil, da je bila uporaba blagovne znamke dokazana le za hladilnike, zamrzovalnike in klimatske module za jahte in čolne (točka 26).
These goods were included in the subcategories apparatus for heating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine can also perform as a heater), apparatus for refrigerating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine, a fridge and a freezer can keep air/things cold), and apparatus for ventilating (insofar as an air-conditioning machine, a fridge and a freezer all include ventilation circuits), for which the mark was registered.
To blago je bilo vključeno v podkategorije aparati za ogrevanje (ker lahko klimatska naprava deluje tudi kot naprava za ogrevanje), aparati za hlajenje (ker lahko klimatska naprava, hladilnik in zamrzovalnik ohranjajo zrak/stvari hladne) in aparati za prezračevanje (ker klimatska naprava, hladilnik in zamrzovalnik vključujejo ventilacijska vezja), za katere je bila znamka registrirana.
This would have further split the ‘subcategories' and would amount to unjustified limitation (para. 28).
To bi dodatno razdelilo podkategorije in pomenilo neupravičeno omejitev (točka 28).
Conclusion: use was considered proven for apparatus for heating, refrigerating and ventilating.
Sklepna ugotovitev: Štelo se je, da je bila uporaba dokazana za aparate za ogrevanje, hlajenje in prezračevanje.
LOTUS 02/12/2008, R 1295/20074, LOTUS Revocation
LOTUS 02/12/2008, R 1295/20074, LOTUS Razveljavitev
G&S: outerwear and underwear, hosiery, corsets, neckties, braces, gloves, underclothes in Class 25.
Blago in storitve: vrhnja in spodnja oblačila, nogavice, stezniki, kravate, naramnice, rokavice in spodnje perilo iz razreda 25.
Assessment of PoU: no evidence was submitted in respect of the goods corsets, neckties, braces.
Presoja dokaza o uporabi: Predloženi niso bili nobeni dokazi v zvezi s stezniki, kravatami in naramnicami.
None of the pieces of evidence submitted mentions these goods or refers to them.
Noben od predloženih dokazov ne vključuje navedbe tega blaga ali se nanj sklicuje.
Use must be demonstrated for all goods or services for which the trade mark is registered.
Uporabo je treba dokazati za vse blago ali storitve, za katere je blagovna znamka registrirana.
The trade mark is registered for outerwear and underwear, but also for specific products within this category - inter alia corsets, neckties, braces.
Blagovna znamka je registrirana za vrhnja in spodnja oblačila, vendar tudi za posebne proizvode iz te kategorije - med drugim steznike, kravate in naramnice.
Use for other goods is not sufficient to maintain protection under trade mark law for these goods, even if these other goods also fall under the category outerwear and underwear.
Uporaba za drugo blago ne zadostuje za ohranitev varstva na podlagi prava o blagovnih znamkah za to blago, čeprav to drugo blago prav tako spada v kategorijo vrhnjih in spodnjih oblačil.
The Invalidity Division, however, considered use to be sufficient because, according to the principles of the Aladin judgment (14/07/2005, T126/03, Aladin, EU:T:2005:288) the corsets, neckties, braces fall under the generic term of outerwear and underwear.
Vendar je oddelek za ničnost menil, da je uporaba zadostna, saj stezniki, kravate in naramnice v skladu z načeli iz sodbe v zadevi Aladin (14/07/2005, T126/03, Aladin, EU:T:2005:288) spadajo pod splošni izraz vrhnja in spodnja oblačila.
While this is indeed true, this question is subordinate to examining whether the goods used can be subsumed under the claimed term at all.
Čeprav je to res, je ta vidik predmet proučitve, ali je sploh mogoče uporabljeno blago vključiti v zahtevani izraz.
This is not the case for corsets, neckties, braces.
Vendar to ne velja za steznike, kravate in naramnice.
If, alongside the broad generic term, the trade mark also explicitly claims specific goods covered by the generic term, it must also have been used for these specific goods in order to remain registered for them (para. 25).
Če blagovna znamka poleg širokega splošnega izraza tudi izrecno zahteva posebno blago, označeno s splošnim izrazom, se je morala uporabljati za to posebno blago, da ostane registrirana zanj (točka 25).
G&S: electric instruments (included in Class 9); optical, weighing, measuring, signalling and checking (supervision) instruments; data processing equipment and computers, in particular for operating, monitoring and checking machines, installations, vehicles and buildings; recorded computer programs; electronic counters in Class 9, repair services in Class 37 and computer programming in Class 42.
Blago in storitve: električni instrumenti (vključeni v razred 9); optični, tehtalni, merilni in signalni instrumenti ter instrumenti za preverjanje (nadziranje); oprema za obdelavo podatkov in računalnikov, zlasti za delovanje, spremljanje in nadzor naprav, inštalacij, vozil in stavb; posneti računalniški programi; elektronski števci iz razreda 9, storitve popravil iz razreda 37 in računalniško programiranje iz razreda 42.
Assessment of PoU: the devices that the opponent has proven to have placed on the market fall under the wording of hardware as specified in Class 9.
Presoja dokaza o uporabi: Naprave, v zvezi s katerimi je vložnik ugovora dokazal, da jih je dal na trg, spadajo pod besedilo strojna oprema iz razreda 9.
This is, however, a vast category, especially considering the massive development and high specialisation taking place in this field, which can be divided into subcategories according to the actual goods produced.
Vendar je to obsežna kategorija, zlasti če se upoštevata precejšen razvoj in visoka specializacija na tem področju, ki ga je mogoče razdeliti v podkategorije glede na dejansko proizvedeno blago.
In the present case, the goods must be limited to the automotive industry.
V tem primeru je treba blago omejiti na avtomobilsko industrijo.
As the opponent is obliged to provide a legal guarantee to clients, it can be considered that it has also proven use of the service relating to repair of the hardware in question (Class 37).
Ker mora vložnik ugovora strankam zagotoviti zakonito jamstvo, je mogoče šteti, da je tudi dokazal uporabo storitve v zvezi s popravili zadevne strojne opreme (razred 37).
The Board also found that recorded computer programs in Class 9 were a very broad category and had to be limited to the actual field of activity of the opponent (paras 3031).
Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil tudi, da so posneti računalniški programi iz razreda 9 zelo široka kategorija in da jih je treba omejiti na dejansko področje dejavnosti vložnika ugovora (točki 30 in 31).
No evidence was submitted for Class 42.
Za razred 42 niso bili predloženi nobeni dokazi.
G&S: foodstuffs for animals in Class 31, and animal foodstuffs, animal feed and non-medicated additives for animal feed; all included in Class 31.
Blago in storitve: živila in krma za živali iz razreda 31 ter živila in krma za živali, krmila in dodatki brez zdravilnih učinkovin za živalska krmila, vsi iz razreda 31.
Assessment of PoU: the contested decision erred in considering that the earlier mark had been put to genuine use for foodstuffs for animals in Class 31, and animal foodstuffs, animal feed and non-medicated additives for animal feed; all included in Class 31, since this finding is contrary to the findings of the Court in Aladin.
Presoja dokaza o uporabi: V izpodbijani odločbi se je zmotno štelo, da se je prejšnja znamka resno in dejansko uporabljala za živila in krmo za živali iz razreda 31 ter živila in krmo za živali, krmila in dodatke brez zdravilnih učinkovin za živalska krmila, vse iz razreda 31, saj je ta ugotovitev v nasprotju z ugotovitvami Sodišča v zadevi Aladin.
The reason given by the contested decision is not acceptable because it should have been tested whether or not the category of goods covered by the earlier mark was susceptible of being divided into independent subcategories and whether the goods for which use of the earlier mark had been proven could be classified in one of those.
Razlog iz izpodbijane odločbe ni sprejemljiv, saj bi moralo biti preizkušeno, ali je mogoče kategorijo blaga, označeno s prejšnjo znamko, razdeliti v neodvisne kategorije in ali bi bilo mogoče blago, za katero je bila dokazana uporaba prejšnje znamke, razvrstiti v eno od teh podkategorij.
Therefore, the Board considers that the earlier EUTM is, for the purposes of examination of the opposition, deemed to be registered in respect of additives for animal feed only in Class 31.
Odbor zato meni, da je mogoče prejšnjo blagovno znamko EU za preizkus ugovora šteti za registrirano samo za dodatke za živalska krmila iz razreda 31.
G&S: all kinds of brushes and brush goods, for cleaning and hygiene purposes in Class 21.
Blago in storitve: vse vrste krtač za čiščenje in higienske namene iz razreda 21.
The proven use of a trade mark for brooms, brushes and sponges, among other goods, was considered sufficient proof of use for ‘all kinds of brushes and brush goods, for cleaning and hygiene purposes', for which the mark was registered.
Dokazana uporaba blagovne znamke za med drugim metle, krtače in gobe se je štela za zadosten dokaz za vse vrste krtač za čiščenje in higienske namene, za katere je bila znamka registrirana.
The Court stated that these household and kitchen products do not constitute a category that is broad enough for it to be necessary to identify them within subcategories in which actual use had specifically to be proven.
Sodišče je navedlo, da ti izdelki za gospodinjstvo in kuhinjo ne sestavljajo kategorije, ki bi bila tako široka, da bi jih bilo treba opredeliti v podkategorijah, v katerih bi bilo treba natančno dokazati njihovo uporabo.
Rather, it must be held that it is not possible to make significant subdivisions within that category of goods.
Nasprotno je treba ugotoviti, da v navedeni kategoriji blaga ni mogoče določiti pomembnih podrazdelkov.
Case No Adequate Non-adequate
Št. zadeve Ustrezna podkategorija Neustrezna podkategorija
13/02/2007, T256/04, Respicur Pharmaceutical preparations for respiratory illnesses.
13/02/2007, T256/04, Respicur Farmacevtski pripravki za bolezni dihal.
Multi-dose dry powder inhalers containing corticoids, available only on prescription.
Odmerki v pršilih, ki vsebujejo kortikoide in se izdajo samo na recept.
23/09/2009, T493/07, Famoxin Pharmaceutical preparations for cardiovascular illnesses.
23/09/2009, T493/07, Famoxin Farmacevtski pripravki za bolezni srca in ožilja.
Pharmaceutical preparations with digoxin for human use for cardiovascular illnesses.
Farmacevtski pripravki z digoksinom za uporabo v humani medicini za bolezni srca in ožilja.
16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237 Pharmaceutical preparations for heart treatment.
16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237 Farmacevtski pripravki za zdravljenje bolezni srca.
Sterile solution of adenosine for use in the treatment of specific heart condition, for intravenous administration in hospitals.
Sterilna raztopina iz adenozina za uporabo pri zdravljenju posebne bolezni srca, za intravenozno uporabo v bolnišnicah.
17/10/2006, T483/04, Galzin, EU:T:2006:323 Calcium-based preparations.
17/10/2006, T483/04, Galzin, EU:T:2006:323 Pripravki na osnovi kalcija.
Pharmaceutical preparations.
Farmacevtski pripravki.
G&S: fire extinguishers and associated products v components and after-sales services.
Blago in storitve: gasilni aparati in povezani proizvodi v primerjavi z deli in poprodajnimi storitvami.
Assessment of PoU: the authorisation for the fire extinguishers sold by Ansul under the Minimax trade mark expired in the 1980s.
Presoja dokaza o uporabi: dovoljenje za gasilne aparate, ki jih je podjetje Ansul prodajalo pod blagovno znamko Minimax, je poteklo v osemdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja.