natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (confirmed 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) The Board of Appeal may take into consideration, in addition to the facts expressly put forward by the parties, facts that are well known, that is, which are likely to be known by anyone or that may be learnt from generally accessible sources.
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (potrjena z dne 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) Odbor za pritožbe lahko poleg dejstev, ki so jih izrecno navedle stranke, upošteva splošno znana dejstva, to so dejstva, ki jih lahko pozna vsak in jih je mogoče dobiti iz splošno dostopnih virov.
That exception must therefore be given a strict interpretation, defining its extent so as not to exceed what is necessary for achieving its object' (paras 29 to 32).
Zaradi tega je treba to določbo razlagati ozko, pri čemer je njen obseg določen tako, da ne presega tistega, kar je nujno potrebno za dosego njenega cilja“ (točke od 29 do 32).
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO It is common knowledge that the earlier mark is indeed a very famous brand, not only in France, but in most European countries, in large part due to the public's exposure to products at airport and duty free boutiques as well as long-standing advertising in widely circulated magazines.
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO Splošno znano je, da je prejšnja znamka resnično zelo slavna v Franciji in večini evropskih držav, predvsem zaradi izpostavljenosti javnosti tem izdelkom na letališčih in v prostocarinskih prodajalnah ter zaradi dolgotrajnega oglaševanja v zelo razširjenih revijah.
The weight of evidence required to support statements that are universally known to be true need not be great (para. 32).
Za potrditev trditev, ki so splošno znane kot resnične, ni potrebno veliko dokazno breme (točka 32).
29/04/2010, R 295/20094, PG PROINGEC CONSULTORIA (fig.) / PROINTEC (fig.) et al. The content of the documentation submitted does not clearly demonstrate that the earlier marks enjoy a reputation.
29/04/2010, R 295/20094, PG PROINGEC CONSULTORIA (fig.) / PROINTEC (fig.) et al. Iz vsebine predložene dokumentacije ni jasno razvidno, da imajo prejšnje znamke ugled.
The documentation emanates, in the main, from the respondent directly and contains information taken from its trade catalogues, its own advertising and documents downloaded from its website.
Dokumentacija izvira predvsem neposredno od pritožnika in vsebuje informacije iz njegovih prodajnih katalogov, oglasov in dokumentov, prenesenih z njegovega spletnega mesta.
There is insufficient documentation/information from third parties to reflect clearly and objectively what precisely the respondent's position on the market is.
Dokumentacija/informacije tretjih oseb ne zadostujejo za jasno in objektivno opredelitev natančnega položaja pritožnika na trgu.
Reputation not proved (para. 26).
Ugled ni bil dokazan (točka 26).
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, As regards documents in the case file that come from the company itself, the General Court has held that, to assess the evidential value of such a document, account should be taken first and foremost of the credibility of the account it contains.
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, Splošno sodišče je v zvezi z dokumenti v sodnem spisu, ki izhajajo iz same družbe, ugotovilo, da bi bilo treba za presojo dokazne vrednosti takih dokumentov upoštevati predvsem verodostojnost informacij, ki jih vsebujejo.
The General Court added that it is then necessary to take account, in particular, of the person from whom the document originates, the circumstances in which it came into being, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, prima facie, the documents appear sound and reliable (para. 49).
Dodalo je, da je treba zato upoštevati zlasti izvor dokumenta, okoliščine njegove priprave in njegovega naslovnika ter ob tem presoditi, ali se dokumenti na prvi pogled zdijo smiselni in zanesljivi (točka 49).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. The statement submitted by an expert consultancy firm in the area of digital media strategy in the UK attests to the fact that the opponent is ‘the leading supplier of digital television in the UK' and that ‘Sky has an enormous and impressive reputation' (para. 37).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. Izjava, ki jo je predložila izvedenska svetovalna družba na področju digitalne medijske strategije iz Združenega kraljestva, potrjuje, da je vložnik ugovora vodilni ponudnik storitev digitalne televizije v Združenem kraljestvu in da ima znamka Sky zelo velik in prepričljiv ugled (točka 37).
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 As far as judgments of Spanish courts are concerned, the European Union trade mark system is an autonomous system, consisting of a set of rules and objectives that are specific and applied independently of any national system (para. 79).
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 Kar zadeva sodbe španskih sodišč, je sistem blagovne znamke EU avtonomni sistem, sestavljen iz sklopa pravil in ciljev, ki so specifični in se uporabljajo neodvisno od vseh nacionalnih sistemov (točka 79).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Decisions of the UK national office relating to the reputation of BOTOX are facts that may, if relevant, be taken into account by the General Court, despite the EUTM owners not being parties in those decisions (para. 78).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Odločbe nacionalnega urada Združenega kraljestva glede ugleda znamke BOTOX so dejstva, ki jih lahko Splošno sodišče upošteva, če so pomembna, kljub temu da imetniki blagovne znamke EU niso stranke v teh odločbah (točka 78).
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. The cancellation applicant did not submit sufficient proof of the reputation of its trade marks.
(fig.)/FRESH in CLEAN et seq. Vložnik zahteve za izbris ni predložil zadostnih dokazov o ugledu svojih znamk.
According to the extracts from the 2001 survey conducted in Italy, although the level of ‘prompted recognition' stands at 86 %, the rate of ‘spontaneous recognition' is only 56 %.
Glede na izvlečke iz raziskave, opravljene leta 2001 v Italiji, je bila stopnja „naključne prepoznavnosti“ samo 56-odstotna, čeprav je bila stopnja „spodbujene prepoznavnosti“ 86-odstotna.
Moreover, no indication is given of the questions put to the people surveyed, making it impossible to determine whether the questions were really open and unassisted.
Poleg tega vprašanja, zastavljena anketirancem, niso bila navedena, zaradi česar ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali so bila vprašanja resnično odprta in niso napeljevala k odgovoru.
The survey further fails to state for which goods the trade mark is known (para. 27).
V raziskavi tudi ni navedeno, v zvezi s katerim blagom je znamka znana (točka 27).
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) The surveys do not seem to be carried out by the well-known GfK company, as the applicant argues, but rather by a Mr Philip Malivore who, according to his own declaration, is only ‘a former director of GfK'.
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) Zdi se, da raziskav ni izvedlo znano podjetje GfK, kot trdi prijavitelj, ampak gospod Philip Malivore, ki je, kot je izjavil, samo „nekdanji direktor podjetja GfK“.
The Board is thus perplexed as to how a former employee of GfK can be authorised to use that company's logo on each and every page of the surveys when he is now ‘an independent market research consultant'.
Odbor je zbegan glede tega, kako je lahko nekdanji zaposleni v podjetju GfK pooblaščen za uporabo logotipa podjetja na vsaki posamezni strani raziskav, če je zdaj „neodvisni svetovalec na področju tržnih raziskav“.
These facts cast considerable doubt on the source, reliability and independent nature of the surveys (para. 49).
Ta dejstva vzbujajo precejšen dvom o viru, zanesljivosti in neodvisni naravi raziskav (točka 49).
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA The survey submitted by the opponent does not provide conclusive information to demonstrate that the earlier sign is well known to the Spanish public for aerated waters as the interviewees were carefully selected on the basis of their origin, that is, Colombians resident in Spain.
/COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA, R 1191/20104 Raziskava, ki jo je predložil vložnik ugovora, ne zagotavlja prepričljivih informacij, ki bi potrdile, da je prejšnji znak v španski javnosti dobro znan v zvezi s sodavicami, saj so bili anketiranci natančno izbrani na podlagi nacionalnosti, tj.
This is only a very small part of the population living in Spain.
Kolumbijci, ki prebivajo v Španiji.
Moreover, the statements are not corroborated by conclusive data on the extent or turnover of the goods (para. 23).
Poleg tega izjave niso bile podprte s prepričljivimi podatki o obsegu prometa blaga (točka 23).
In principle, samples of 1 000-2 000 interviewees are considered sufficient, provided they are representative of the type of consumer concerned.
Načeloma se za zadostne štejejo vzorci od 1 000 do 2 000 anketirancev, če so reprezentativni za upoštevno vrsto potrošnikov.
The opponent's opinion poll was based on a sample of 500 interviewees, which is not sufficient in respect of the services for which reputation is claimed.
Javnomnenjska raziskava, ki jo je predložil vložnik ugovora, je temeljila na vzorcu 500 anketirancev, kar ne zadostuje za storitve, v zvezi s katerimi se domneva njihov ugled.
According to the opinion poll, the logo of the earlier mark has been associated especially with services in the financial and insurance fields.
V skladu z javnomnenjsko raziskavo je logotip prejšnje znamke povezan zlasti s storitvami na finančnem in zavarovalniškem področju.
Since the opposition is only based on Class 42 with regard to the earlier European Union trade mark, it does not cover financial and insurance services.
Ker ugovor temelji izključno na razredu 42 v zvezi s prejšnjo blagovno znamko Evropske unije, ne zajema finančnih in zavarovalniških storitev.
Consequently, the opinion poll submitted is not suitable proof of the reputation of the opponent's European Union trade mark (para. 58).
Posledično predložena javnomnenjska raziskava ni ustrezen dokaz o ugledu blagovne znamke Evropske unije vložnika ugovora (točka 58).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. The many brand awards won by the mark were, together with the huge investment in advertising and the number of articles published in different publications, considered an important part of the evidence for reputation (para. 9(iii) and para. 27).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. Številne nagrade za blagovne znamke, ki jih je prejela znamka, skupaj z obsežnimi naložbami v oglaševanje in številom objav v različnih publikacijah, so se štele za pomemben del dokazov o ugledu (točki 9(iii) in 27).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The very existence of articles in a scientific publication or the general-interest press constitutes a relevant factor in establishing the reputation of the products marketed under the trade mark BOTOX amongst the general public, irrespective of the positive or negative content of those articles (para. 54).
16/12/2010, T345/08 in T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potrjena 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Objava člankov v znanstvenih publikacijah ali splošnem tisku je pomemben dejavnik pri ugotavljanju ugleda izdelkov, ki se tržijo pod znamko BOTOX, pri splošni javnosti, in to ne glede na njihovo pozitivno ali negativno vsebino (točka 54).
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI & ABBRACCI The reputation of the earlier trade mark in Italy was proven by the copious amount of documentation submitted by the opponent, which included, inter alia, an article from Economy revealing that in 2005 the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark was one of the fifteen most counterfeited fashion brands in the world; an article published in Il Tempo on 05/08/2005, in which the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark is mentioned alongside others, including Dolce & Gabbana, Armani, Lacoste and Puma, as being targeted by counterfeiters; an article published in Fashion on 15/06/2006, in which the trade mark is defined as ‘a true market phenomenon'; publicity campaigns from 2004 to 2007, with testimonials from entertainment and sports celebrities; and a market survey conducted by the renowned independent agency Doxa in September 2007, from which it emerges that the trade mark is ‘top of mind' in the fashion sector for 0.6 % of the Italian public (para. 35).
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI in ABBRACCI Ugled prejšnje znamke v Italiji je bil dokazan z obsežno dokumentacijo, ki jo je predložil vložnik ugovora in je med drugim vključevala članek iz revije Economy, v katerem je bilo objavljeno, da je bila znamka „BACI & ABBRACCI“ leta 2005 ena od petnajstih najpogosteje ponarejenih modnih znamk na svetu; članek, objavljen v časopisu Il Tempo 5. avgusta 2005, v katerem je zapisano, da je ta znamka poleg drugih, vključno z znamkami Dolce & Gabbana, Armani, Lacoste in Puma, tarča ponarejevalcev; članek, objavljen v reviji Fashion 15. junija 2006, v katerem je znamka opredeljena kot „pravi tržni fenomen“; oglaševalske kampanje od leta 2004 do leta 2007 s priporočili slavnih oseb iz sveta zabave in športa; in tržna raziskava, ki jo je septembra 2007 opravila priznana neodvisna agencije Doxa, iz katere je razvidno, da je znamka za 0,6 % italijanske javnosti „najbolj priznana“ v modnem sektorju (točka 35).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed by 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The inclusion of a word in a dictionary is the expression of a fair amount of recognition on the part of the public.
16/12/2010, T345/08 in T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potrjena dne 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Vključitev besede v slovar pomeni precejšnjo stopnjo prepoznavnosti v javnosti.
The references in the 2002 and 2003 editions of a number of dictionaries published in the United Kingdom constitute one of the items of evidence that may establish the reputation of the trade mark BOTOX in that country or amongst the English-speaking public of the European Union (paras 55 and 56).
Navedbe v izdajah več slovarjev, objavljenih v Združenem kraljestvu v letih 2002 in 2003, pomenijo enega od dokazov, na podlagi katerih je mogoče opredeliti ugled znamke BOTOX v tej državi ali pri angleško govoreči javnosti v Evropski uniji (točki 55 in 56).
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) The evidence submitted shows a high level of recognition of the mark on the Spanish market.
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) Iz predloženih dokazov je razvidna visoka stopnja prepoznavnosti znamke na španskem trgu.
The total invoices on the Spanish tin-loaf market in 2004 amounted to EUR 346.7 million, of which the opponent's invoices amounted to EUR 204.9 million.
Vsi izdani računi za kruh iz modla na španskem trgu so leta 2004 znašali 346,7 milijona EUR, pri čemer je delež izdanih računov vložnika ugovora znašal 204,9 milijona EUR.
The invoices submitted cover advertisements on TV, as well as in newspapers and magazines.
Predloženi računi vključujejo oglase na televiziji, v časopisih in revijah.
Therefore, the reputation of ‘BIMBO' in Spain for industrially produced bread has been substantiated (para. 64).
Zato je bil ugled znamke „BIMBO“ v Španiji v zvezi z industrijsko izdelanim kruhom potrjen (točka 64).
The Court did not address this point.
Sodišče tega ni obravnavalo.
10/01/2011, R 43/20104, FFR (fig.) / CONSORZIO VINO CHIANTI CLASSICO (fig.), (05/12/2012, T143/11, F.F.R., EU:T:2012:645) The documents submitted show that the device of a black rooster has acquired reputation and will be associated with wines from the Chianti Classico region.
10/01/2011, R 43/20104, FFR (fig.) / CONSORZIO VINO CHIANTI CLASSICO (fig.), (05/12/2012, T143/11, F.F.R., EU:T:2012:645) Iz predloženih dokumentov je razvidno, da je logotip črnega petelina pridobil ugled in se povezuje z vinom iz regije Chianti Classico.
The opponent provided several copies of advertisements in newspapers and magazines, showing its promotional activity, as well as independent articles displaying a black rooster in connection with the Chianti Classico region.
Vložnik ugovora je predložil več kopij oglasov iz časopisov in revij, iz katerih je razvidna njegova promocijska dejavnost, ter neodvisne članke, ki prikazujejo črnega petelina v povezavi z regijo Chianti Classico.
However, given that the reputation only pertains to the device of a black rooster and given that this device is only one part of the earlier marks, serious doubts arise about whether reputation can be attributed to the marks as a whole.
Vendar se glede na to, da se ugled nanaša samo na logotip črnega petelina, ki pa je samo del prejšnjih znamk, pojavljajo resni dvomi, ali je mogoče ugled pripisati znamkam kot celoti.
Moreover, for the same reason, doubt also arises about which marks the reputation could be attributed to, given that the opponent owns several marks.
Poleg tega se iz istega razloga pojavijo tudi dvomi o tem, katerim znamkam je mogoče pripisati ugled, saj je vložnik ugovora imetnik več znamk (točki 26 in 27).
(paras 26 and 27).
Sodišče ni presojalo dokazov o ugledu.
The Court did not assess the evidence on reputation.
Prejšnji znak z ugledom Prijava blagovne znamke EU Št. zadeve
The trade mark BOTOX had a reputation for pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of wrinkles in the United Kingdom on the filing date of the contested marks, which cover a range of goods in Class 3.
Znamka BOTOX je imela ugled v zvezi s farmacevtskimi pripravki za odpravljanje gub v Združenem kraljestvu na datum vložitve prijave za sporni znamki, ki označujeta več vrst blaga iz razreda 3.
The General Court confirmed the Board's finding that there is a certain overlap between the goods, namely a low degree of similarity between the opponent's pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of wrinkles and the contested cosmetics among other creams, whereas the remaining contested goods, namely perfumes, suntanning milks, shampoos, bath salts, etc., are dissimilar.
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitev odbora, da se blago nekoliko prekriva, in sicer gre za nizko stopnjo podobnosti med farmacevtskimi pripravki za odpravljanje gub vložnika ugovora in spornimi kozmetičnimi izdelki, med drugim kremami, medtem ko je preostalo sporno blago, in sicer parfumi, mleko za sončenje, šamponi, kopalne soli itd., različno.
Nevertheless, the goods at issue concern related market sectors.
Vsekakor je sporno blago povezano s povezanimi tržnimi sektorji.
The General Court confirmed the Board's finding that the relevant public - practitioners as well as the general public - would not fail to notice that both the trade marks applied for, BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL, begin with ‘BOTO-', which comprises almost the whole of the mark BOTOX, which is well known to the public.
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitev odbora, da upoštevna javnost - strokovni delavci in splošna javnost - ne bi prezrla, da se obe znamki, za kateri je vložena prijava, BOTOLIST in BOTOCYL, začneta s predpono „BOTO-“, ki sestavljajo skoraj celotno ime znamke BOTOX, znane v javnosti.
The General Court pointed out that ‘BOTO- is not a common prefix, either in the pharmaceutical field or in the cosmetic field and that it has no descriptive meaning.
Splošno sodišče je poudarilo, da BOTO- ni običajna predpona niti na farmacevtskem niti na kozmetičnem področju in nima opisnega pomena.
Even if the sign BOTOX could be broken down into ‘bo' for ‘botulinum' and ‘tox' for ‘toxin', in reference to the active ingredient that it uses, that word would then have to be considered to have acquired a distinctive character, inherent or through use, at least in the United Kingdom.
Tudi če bi bilo mogoče znak BOTOX razdeliti na „bo“ za „botulin“ in „tox“ za „toksin“ glede na aktivno snov, ki jo vsebuje, bi bilo treba to beseda nato obravnavati, kot da ima razlikovalni značaj, ki ga je pridobila sama po sebi ali z uporabo, vsaj v Združenem kraljestvu.
In light of all the relevant factors, the public would naturally be led to establish a link between the marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL and the reputed mark BOTOX (paras 65 to 79).
Glede na vse upoštevne dejavnike bi javnost seveda vzpostavila zvezo med znamkama BOTOLIST in BOTOCYL ter znamko BOTOX z ugledom (točke od 65 do 79).
Earlier reputed sign EUTM application Case No
Prejšnji znak z ugledom Prijava blagovne znamke EU Št. zadeve
The Board found that a link would be established between RED DOG and RED BULL because (i) the marks have some relevant common features, (ii) the conflicting goods in Classes 32-33 are identical, (3) the RED BULL mark is reputed, (iv) the RED BULL mark has acquired a strong distinctive character through use and (v) there might be a possibility of confusion (para. 19).
Odbor je ugotovil, da bi se vzpostavila zveza med znamkama RED DOG in RED BULL, saj (i) imata nekaj pomembnih skupnih značilnosti, (ii) nasprotujoče si blago v razredih 32 in 33 je enako, (iii) znamka RED BULL ima ugled, (iv) znamka RED BULL je pridobila močan razlikovalni značaj z uporabo in (v) lahko bi obstajala verjetnost zmede (točka 19).
It is reasonable to assume that the average consumer of beverages, who knows the reputed RED BULL mark and sees the RED DOG marks on the same kind of beverages would immediately recall the earlier mark.
Smiselno je predvidevati, da bi se povprečni potrošnik pijač, ki pozna ugledno znamko RED BULL, ob pogledu na znamko RED DOG za isto vrsto pijače takoj spomnil na prejšnjo znamko.
According to the Intel judgment, this is ‘tantamount to the existence of a link' between the marks (para. 24).
V skladu s sodbo v zadevi Intel to pomeni „obstoj zveze“ med znamkama (točka 24).
The trade marks are highly similar overall (para. 42).
Znamki sta si na splošno zelo podobni (točka 42).
Visually, all the letters of the earlier trade mark are present in the contested one, and the first four and final two are in the same order.
Vizualno so vse črke prejšnje znamke v imenu izpodbijane znamke, prve štiri in zadnji dve pa si sledijo v enakem vrstnem redu.
There is visual similarity, especially since the public tends to pay more attention to the beginnings of words (paras 35 and 36).
Obstaja vizualna podobnost, zlasti ker javnost večjo pozornost navadno namenja začetkom besed (točki 35 in 36).
The identity of the first and last syllable, together with the fact that the middle syllables have the sound [g] in common, leads to a high degree of phonetic similarity (paras 38 and 39).
Enakost prvega in zadnjega zloga ter dejstvo, da oba srednja zloga vsebujeta glas [g], pomenita, da gre za visoko stopnjo zvočne podobnosti (točki 38 in 39).
Neither of the signs has a meaning and, therefore, the public will not differentiate them conceptually (para. 40).
Nobeden od znakov nima pomena, zato ju javnost ne bo pojmovno razlikovala (točka 40).
The earlier mark covers pharmaceuticals for the treatment of erectile dysfunctions in Class 5, whereas the contested mark covers non-alcoholic and alcoholic drinks in Classes 32 and 33.
Prejšnja znamka označuje farmacevtske izdelke za zdravljenje erektilne disfunkcije iz razreda 5, izpodbijana znamka pa označuje brezalkoholne in alkoholne pijače iz razredov 32 in 33.
The reputation of the earlier sign for the goods mentioned is not disputed.
Ugled prejšnjega znaka v zvezi z navedenim blagom je nesporen.
The General Court found that although no direct connection can be established between the goods covered by the marks in dispute since they are dissimilar, an association with the earlier mark remains possible, taking into account the high degree of similarity between the signs and the strong reputation acquired by the earlier mark.
Splošno sodišče je ugotovilo, da čeprav ni mogoče ugotoviti neposredne zveze med blagom, ki ga označujeta znamki, ki sta predmet spora, saj sta različni, je asociacija na prejšnjo znamko kljub temu mogoča, in sicer ob upoštevanju visoke stopnje podobnosti med znakoma in velikega ugleda, ki ga je pridobila prejšnja znamka.