natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where the translation is formally requested and it is not submitted or it is submitted late, or where the request to change the language is submitted late (after the expiry of the 2 months), the language of the proceedings will remain unchanged (Article 13 EUTMDR).
Če se prevod formalno zahteva in ni predložen oziroma je predložen prepozno ali če je zahteva za spremembo jezika predložena prepozno (po izteku dvomesečnega roka), bo jezik postopka ostal nespremenjen (člen 13 Delegirane uredbe).
3.3.2 Translation of evidence of substantiation submitted by the applicant
Prevod dokazov o utemeljitvi, ki jih predloži vložnik zahteve
Article 16(2) EUTMDR
Člen 16(2) Delegirane uredbe
Article 24 and Article 25(1) EUTMIR
Člen 24 in člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe
3.3.2.1 Evidence of filing, registration or renewal certificates or equivalent documents, any provisions of the applicable national law
Dokazi o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju ali enakovredni dokumenti ter določbe veljavnega nacionalnega prava
Where the application is based on the grounds of Article 60(1) and (2) EUTMR, the evidence concerning the filing, registration or renewal of earlier marks or rights, or where applicable, the contents of the relevant national law must be submitted in the language of the proceedings, or should be translated into the language of the proceedings.
Če zahteva temelji na razlogih iz člena 60(1) in (2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, je treba dokaze o vložitvi, registraciji ali podaljšanju prejšnjih blagovnih znamk ali pravic ali, če je ustrezno, vsebini ustreznega nacionalnega prava predložiti v jeziku postopka oziroma jih je treba prevesti v jezik postopka.
The translation is to be submitted by the applicant of its own motion within 1 month of the filing of such evidence.
Vložnik zahteve mora prevod predložiti na svojo pobudo v enem mesecu od vložitve takšnih dokazov.
This applies to all the evidence submitted by the applicant in the course of the proceedings in order to comply with the requirements of Article 16(1)(b) and (c) EUTMDR, whether it is submitted together with the application or at a later stage.
To velja za vse dokaze, ki jih vložnik zahteve predloži med postopkom za izpolnitev zahtev iz člena 16(1)(b) in (c) Delegirane uredbe, in sicer ne glede na to, ali so predložena skupaj z zahtevo ali v poznejši fazi.
The Office will not send a deficiency letter, and it is up to the applicant to submit the translation of the evidence in support of the application of its own motion.
Urad ne bo pošiljal poziva za dopolnitev zahteve, vložnik zahteve pa mora na svojo pobudo poskrbeti, da predloži prevod dokazov v podporo zahtevi.
The requirement of translating the evidence of substantiation also relates to online evidence referred to by the applicant, where the language of the online evidence is not the same as the language of the proceedings.
Zahteva glede prevoda dokazov o utemeljitvi se nanaša tudi na spletne dokaze, na katera se sklicuje vložnik zahteve, če jezik spletnih dokazov ni jezik postopka.
This follows from Article 16(2) EUTMDR, which states that ‘evidence accessible online' must also either be in the language of the proceedings, or be accompanied by a translation.
To izhaja iz člena 16(2) Delegirane uredbe, ki določa, da so dokazi dostopni na spletu v jeziku postopka ali se predložijo skupaj s prevodom.
Article 25(1) EUTMIR requires that the translation reproduces the structure and contents of the original document.
Člen 25(1) Izvedbene uredbe zahteva, da se prevod ujema z zgradbo in vsebino izvirnega dokumenta.
In the case of translations of online evidence of substantiation, the submission of the translation without the original will be accepted, as long as the document to which it refers is identified correctly.
V primeru prevodov spletnih dokazov o utemeljitvi bo sprejeta predložitev prevoda brez izvirnega dokumenta, če je dokument, na katerega se prevod nanaša, pravilno opredeljen.
Any document in support of the application that is not translated by the applicant into the language of proceedings within the time limit specified in Article 16(2) EUTMDR will be deemed not to have been received by the Office, and therefore will not be taken into account (Article 25(2) EUTMIR) (05/03/2012, R 826/20104, MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 (fig.), § 25).
V zvezi z vsemi dokumenti v podporo zahtevi, ki jih vložnik zahteve v roku iz člena 16(2) Delegirane uredbe, ne bo prevedel v jezik postopka, se bo štelo, da jih Urad ni prejel in se zato ne bodo upoštevali (člen 25(2) Izvedbene uredbe) (05/03/2012, R 826/20104, MANUFACTURE PRIM 1949 (fig.), točka 25).
3.3.2.2 Other evidence
Drugi dokazi
Any other evidence submitted by the applicant to substantiate the application, such as evidence showing use in the course of trade or evidence of reputation, will be subject to Article 24 EUTMIR, namely it will only have to be translated into the language of the proceedings at the Office's request within a period specified to that effect.
Za vse druge dokaze, ki jih predloži vložnik za utemeljitev zahteve, kot so dokazi o uporabi v gospodarskem prometu ali dokazi o ugledu, se bo uporabljal člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe, in sicer jih bo treba prevesti le v jezik postopka na zahtevo Urada v roku, ki ga za to določi Urad.
3.3.3 Translation of observations submitted by the parties in the course of the proceedings
Prevod pripomb, ki jih stranke predložijo med postopkom
Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR
Člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe
In written proceedings before the Office, a party who submits observations in a language of the Office other than the language of the proceedings has to submit a translation of those observations in the language of the proceedings within 1 month of the submission date (Article 146(9) EUTMR).
Stranka, ki v pisnem postopku pred Uradom predloži pripombe v enem izmed uradnih jezikov Urada, ki ni jezik postopka, mora predložiti prevod teh pripomb v jeziku postopka v enem mesecu po dnevu vložitve (člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
The Office will not ask for the translations and will proceed with the case.
Urad ne bo posebej prosil za prevode in bo zadevo obravnaval naprej.
It is up to the party to submit the requisite translations.
Za predložitev zahtevanih prevodov je odgovorna stranka.
If the translations are not submitted on the parties' initiative within the time limit of 1 month, the observations will be deemed not to have been received by the Office, and therefore will not be taken into account (Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR).
Če se prevodi na pobudo strank ne predložijo v enem mesecu, se bo štelo, da Urad pripomb ni prejel, in se zato ne bodo upoštevale (člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe).
Where a party submits observations in a language of the European Union that is not a language of the Office, the 1month time limit to translate the observations does not apply.
Če stranka pripombe predloži v jeziku Evropske unije, ki ni jezik Urada, se enomesečni rok za prevod pripomb ne uporablja.
The observations will be deemed not to have been received from the outset, and will not be taken into account.
Štelo se bo, da pripombe niso bile prejete od začetka, zato se ne bodo upoštevale.
3.3.4 Translation of evidence submitted by the EUTM proprietor in the course of the proceedings
Prevod dokazov, ki jih imetnik blagovne znamke EU predloži med postopkom
Article 24 and Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR
Člen 24 in člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The supporting documents submitted by the EUTM proprietor in the course of the proceedings (except for proof of use, see below) are subject to Article 24 EUTMIR, and therefore may be submitted in any official language of the European Union.
Za dokaze, ki jih med postopkom predloži imetnik blagovne znamke EU (razen dokazov o uporabi, glej v nadaljevanju), se uporablja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe in jih je zato mogoče predložiti v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije.
In accordance with this provision, the EUTM proprietor is not automatically obliged to submit a translation, but the Office may require it to do so within a time limit.
V skladu s to določbo imetnik blagovne znamke EU ni samodejno zavezan k predložitvi prevoda, vendar lahko Urad zahteva, da to stori v določenem roku.
When exercising its discretion in this matter, the Office will take into account the nature of the evidence and the interests of the parties.
Urad bo pri uveljavljanju svoje diskrecijske pravice glede tega vprašanja upošteval naravo dokazov in interese strank.
In cases where the Office does invite the EUTM proprietor to submit translations of the evidence, failure to do so within the specified time limit will mean that the untranslated documents will not be taken into account (Article 25(2)(a) EUTMIR).
Če Urad imetnika blagovne znamke EU pozove, naj predloži prevode dokazov, in ta tega ne stori v določenem roku, to pomeni, da se neprevedeni dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali (člen 25(2)(a) Izvedbene uredbe).
3.3.5 Translation of proof of use
Prevod dokaza o uporabi
Article 19 EUTMDR
Člen 19 Delegirane uredbe
According to Article 19(1) EUTMDR (to which Article 10(6) EUTMDR applies mutatis mutandis) and to Article 19(2) EUTMDR (to which Article 24 EUTMIR applies directly), evidence of use may be submitted in any official language of the European Union.
V skladu s členom 19(1) Delegirane uredbe (v zvezi s katerim se smiselno uporablja člen 10(6) Delegirane uredbe) in členom 19(2) Delegirane uredbe (v zvezi s katerim se neposredno uporablja člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe) se lahko dokaz o uporabi predloži v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije.
Where the evidence of use is not in the language of the proceedings, the Office may require the party to submit a translation of the evidence into that language within a time limit specified by it.
Kadar dokazi o uporabi niso v jeziku postopka, lahko Urad od stranke zahteva, da v roku, ki ga določi, predloži prevod dokazov v navedeni jezik.
In exercising its discretion in this matter, the Office will take into account the nature of the evidence and the interests of the parties.
Urad bo pri uveljavljanju svoje diskrecijske pravice glede tega vprašanja upošteval naravo dokazov in interese strank.
In cases where the Office does invite the party to submit translations of the evidence, failure to do so within the specified time limit will mean that the untranslated documents will not be taken into account.
Če Urad stranko pozove, naj predloži prevode dokazov, in ta tega ne stori v določenem roku, to pomeni, da se neprevedeni dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali.
For further guidance on translation of evidence of use, see the Guidelines, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use, paragraph 3.6.
Za dodatne smernice o prevodu dokaza o uporabi glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi, odstavek 3.6.
3.4 Requests for proof of use
Zahteve za dokaz o uporabi
Article 19(2) EUTMDR
Člen 19(2) Delegirane uredbe
The practice regarding proof of use requests according to Article 64(2) or (3) EUTMR, where the EUTM proprietor wishes to request proof of use of the earlier trade marks on which the application for invalidity is based, has been aligned with opposition proceedings (Article 10(1) EUTMDR).
Praksa v zvezi z zahtevami za dokaz o uporabi na podlagi člena 64(2) ali (3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, v skladu s katero želi imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevati dokaz o uporabi prejšnjih blagovnih znamk, na katerih temelji zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti, je bila usklajena s postopkom ugovora (člen 10(1) Delegirane uredbe).
In cancellation proceedings, a request for proof of use must be filed by the EUTM proprietor together with its first reply to the application, within the first time limit set to submit observations according to Article 17(1) EUTMDR.
V postopku izbrisa mora imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi vložiti skupaj s svojim prvim odgovorom na zahtevo, in sicer v prvem roku, ki je v skladu s členom 17(1) Delegirane uredbe določen za predložitev pripomb.
If a request for proof of use is submitted by the EUTM proprietor at a later stage of the proceedings, it will not be admissible.
Če imetnik blagovne znamke EU zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi predloži v poznejši fazi postopka, ta ne bo dopustna.
In addition, according to Article 19(2) EUTMDR, where the EUTM proprietor wishes to request proof of use, it must do so by way of a separate document.
V skladu s členom 19(2) Delegirane uredbe mora poleg tega imetnik blagovne znamke EU, če želi zahtevati dokaz o uporabi, to storiti v ločeni vlogi.
When defining what a ‘separate document' is, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters, paragraph 4.4.1, as the same principles apply.
V zvezi z opredelitvijo ločene vloge glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve, odstavek 4.4.1, saj veljajo enaka načela.
For further guidance on requests for proof of use, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use, paragraph 3.
Za dodatne navodila o zahtevah za dokaz o uporabi glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi, odstavek 3.
4 Other Issues
Druga vprašanja
4.1 Continuation of proceedings
Nadaljevanje postopka
According to Article 105(1) EUTMR, any party to proceedings before the Office that has omitted to observe a time limit vis-à-vis the Office may, upon request, obtain the continuation of proceedings, provided that at the time the request is made the omitted act has been carried out.
V skladu s členom 105(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU lahko katera koli stranka v postopku pred Uradom, ki ni upoštevala roka Urada, na zahtevo doseže nadaljevanje postopka, če je bilo zamujeno dejanje ob predložitvi zahteve izpeljano.
The request for continuation of proceedings will be admissible only if it is presented within 2 months of the expiry of the unobserved time limit and will not be deemed to have been filed until the corresponding fee has been paid.
Zahteva za nadaljevanje postopka bo dopustna le, če se predloži v dveh mesecih po preteku neupoštevanega roka, pri čemer se bo štelo, da ni bila vložena, dokler se ne plača ustrezna pristojbina.
This provision is applicable to all the proceedings before the Office.
Ta določba se uporablja za vse postopke pred Uradom.
For more details, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits.
Za več podrobnosti glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
In cancellation proceedings, continuation of proceedings can be requested for any of the different time limits within the cancellation proceedings (except for the time limit established in Article 68(1) EUTMR to file an appeal).
V postopku izbrisa se lahko zahteva nadaljevanje postopka za katerega koli od različnih rokov v postopku izbrisa (razen za rok za vložitev pritožbe iz člena 68(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
4.2 Suspensions
Začasna prekinitev
Article 132 EUTMR
Člen 132 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 71 EUTMDR
Člen 71 Delegirane uredbe
In the matter of suspensions, see in general the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 1, Procedural Matters (taking into account, however, that in cancellation proceedings there is no cooling-off period).
Splošne informacije glede začasne prekinitve so na voljo v Smernicah, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 1: Postopkovne zadeve (ob upoštevanju, da v postopku izbrisa ni obdobja za pobotanje).
Article 71 EUTMDR applies.
Uporablja se člen 71 Delegirane uredbe.
The main particularity of cancellation proceedings in this matter concerns the specific rules on related actions before European Union trade mark courts.
Glavna posebnost v postopku izbrisa v tej zadevi se nanaša na posebna pravila o sorodnih tožbah pred sodišči za blagovne znamke Evropske unije.
According to Article 132(2) EUTMR, the Office, when hearing an application for cancellation will, unless there are special grounds for continuing the hearing, of its own motion after hearing the parties or at the request of one of the parties and after hearing the other parties, suspend the proceedings where the validity of the contested EUTM is already in issue on account of a counterclaim before a European Union trade mark court.
V skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bo Urad, ko obravnava zahtevo za izbris, razen če obstajajo posebni razlogi za nadaljevanje obravnave, na svojo pobudo po zaslišanju strank ali na zahtevo ene od strank in po zaslišanju drugih strank postopek ustavil, če se veljavnost izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU že izpodbija zaradi nasprotne tožbe pred sodiščem za blagovne znamke Evropske unije.
Article 132(2) EUTMR also states that if one of the parties to the proceedings before the European Union trade mark court so requests, the European Union trade mark court may, after hearing the other parties to these proceedings, suspend the proceedings.
V členu 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je navedeno tudi, da če tako zahteva ena od strank v postopku pred sodiščem za blagovne znamke Evropske unije, lahko sodišče po zaslišanju drugih strank v tem postopku postopek ustavi.
The Office will continue the proceedings pending before it in this case.
V tem primeru Urad nadaljuje obravnavo.
A request for suspension pursuant to Article 132(2) EUTMR should be supported by relevant evidence.
Zahtevo za začasno prekinitev v skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba podpreti z ustreznimi dokazi.
Suspension requests are only considered relevant to the proceedings and might be granted under Article 132(2) EUTMR in cases where they refer to the contested EUTM and not where they refer to other EUTMs contested in parallel cancellation proceedings.
Zahteve za začasno prekinitev se štejejo za pomembne za postopek in jim je mogoče ugoditi v skladu s členom 132(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU le, če se nanašajo na izpodbijano blagovno znamko EU, ne pa tudi, če se nanašajo na druge blagovne znamke EU, ki se izpodbijajo v vzporednem postopku izbrisa.
4.3 Surrenders, withdrawals and closure of the proceedings
Odpovedi, umiki in zaključek postopka
Article 57(2) EUTMR
Člen 57(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 17(5), (6), (7) and (8) EUTMDR
Člen 17(5), (6), (7) in (8) Delegirane uredbe
4.3.1 Surrenders
Odpovedi
In principle, the consequences in cancellation proceedings of a total surrender of the contested EUTM (or of a partial surrender of some of the goods and/or services against which the application for cancellation is directed) are similar to those of the withdrawal of an EUTM application in opposition proceedings.
Načeloma so v postopku izbrisa posledice celotne odpovedi izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU (ali delne odpovedi nekaterega blaga in/ali storitev, na katere se nanaša zahteva za izbris) podobne posledicam umika prijave blagovne znamke EU v postopku ugovora.
However, unlike what occurs with the withdrawal of an EUTM application, the effects of the surrender of a registered EUTM are not the same as those of the decision on the substance terminating the proceedings in question.
V nasprotju s tem, kar se zgodi pri umiku prijave blagovne znamke EU, pa učinki odpovedi registrirane blagovne znamke EU niso enaki tistim pri meritorni odločbi o prekinitvi zadevnega postopka.
While the surrender of an EUTM only becomes effective on the date on which the surrender is registered, a decision cancelling the EUTM produces its effects from an earlier date, be it from the outset (in the case of invalidity) or from either the date on which the cancellation request was filed or which was fixed in the Office's decision at the request of one of the parties pursuant to Article 62(1) EUTMR (in the case of revocation).
Odpoved blagovne znamke EU začne veljati na dan registracije, učinki odločbe o izbrisu blagovne znamke EU pa segajo nazaj, in sicer do začetka (v primeru ničnosti) ali bodisi datuma, ko je bila vložena zahteva za izbris, bodisi datuma, določenega v odločbi Urada na zahtevo ene od strank v skladu s členom 62(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (v primeru razveljavitve).
Consequently, despite the declaration of surrender of the contested EUTM, the applicant may still claim to have a legitimate interest in continuing the cancellation proceedings in order to obtain a decision on the substance (24/03/2011, C552/09 P, TiMiKinderjoghurt, EU:C:2011:177, § 39; 22/10/2010, R 463/20094, MAGENTA (col.), § 25-27).
Zato lahko kljub izjavi o odpovedi izpodbijane blagovne znamke EU vložnik zahteve še vedno trdi, da ima legitimen interes za nadaljevanje postopka izbrisa, v katerem pridobi meritorno odločbo (24/03/2011, C552/09 P, TiMiKinderjoghurt, EU:C:2011:177, § 39; 22/10/2010, R 463/20094, MAGENTA (col.), § 25-27).
However, the claim of legitimate interest must be declared and proven by the applicant (see paragraph 4.3.1.2 below).
Vendar mora vložnik zahteve prijaviti legitimni interes in ga dokazati (glej odstavek 4.3.1.2 v nadaljevanju).
In practice, when there is a total or partial surrender of an EUTM that is subject to cancellation proceedings, and this surrender affects the scope of the proceedings, the Office will suspend the registration of the surrender and, in parallel, will notify the cancellation applicant of the surrender, inviting it to inform the Office whether it withdraws the application in view of the declared surrender.
Če se v praksi blagovna znamka EU, v zvezi s katero poteka postopek izbrisa, odpove v celoti ali delno in ta odpoved vpliva na obseg postopka, bo Urad začasno prekinil registracijo odpovedi in hkrati vložnika zahteve za izbris obvestil o odpovedi ter ga pozval, naj ga obvesti, ali zaradi prijavljene odpovedi umika zahtevo.
The consequence for the parties and the Office will depend not only on the reply of the applicant, but also on the type of cancellation proceedings in question, that is to say, whether the cancellation action is an application for revocation or whether it is an application for a declaration of invalidity.
Posledice za stranke in Urad ne bodo odvisne le od odgovora vložnika zahteve, temveč tudi od vrste zadevnega postopka izbrisa, to je od tega, ali je zahteva za izbris zahteva za razveljavitev ali zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti.
4.3.1.1 Application for revocation pending
Nerešena zahteva za razveljavitev
If, in reply to the Office's letter, the applicant replies by withdrawing the application for revocation as a consequence of the surrender, the surrender will be recorded and the proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance.
Če vložnik zahteve v odgovor na dopis Urada zaradi odpovedi umakne zahtevo za razveljavitev, se odpoved evidentira, postopek pa se konča brez meritorne odločbe.
The application will be withdrawn.
Zahteva bo umaknjena.
If the applicant does not reply, the suspension of the surrender will be maintained and the cancellation proceedings will continue until there is a final decision on the substance.
Če vložnik zahteve ne odgovori, se prekinitev odpovedi ohrani, postopek izbrisa pa se nadaljuje, dokler ni sprejeta dokončna meritorna odločba.
After the decision on the cancellation has become final, the surrender will be recorded only for the goods and/or services for which the contested EUTM has not been revoked, if any.
Po dokončnosti odločbe o izbrisu se odpoved zabeleži samo za blago in/ali storitve, za katere izpodbijana blagovna znamka EU ni bila razveljavljena, če obstajajo.
4.3.1.2 Application for a declaration of invalidity pending
Nerešena zahteva za ugotovitev ničnosti
If, in reply to the Office's letter, the applicant replies by withdrawing the application for a declaration of invalidity as a consequence of the surrender, the surrender will be recorded and the proceedings will be closed without a decision on the substance.
Če vložnik zahteve v odgovor na dopis Urada zaradi odpovedi umakne zahtevo za ugotovitev ničnosti, se odpoved evidentira, postopek pa se konča brez meritorne odločbe.
If the applicant does not reply, the surrender will be recorded and the cancellation proceedings will continue for the remaining goods and/or services against which the cancellation is directed that were not removed by the partial surrender, if any.
Če vložnik zahteve ne odgovori, se odpoved evidentira, postopek izbrisa pa se nadaljuje za preostalo blago in/ali storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen izbris in ki niso bile odstranjene z delno odpovedjo, če obstajajo.