natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The physical condition is another feature of the goods that may be used to define nature but, like the functioning principle, it is not conclusive.
Fizikalno stanje je še ena od lastnosti blaga, ki jo je mogoče uporabiti za opredelitev narave, vendar tako kot načelo delovanja tudi to ni odločilno.
All drinks are liquid.
Vse pijače so tekoče.
Their nature is different from the nature of solid foodstuffs.
Njihova narava je drugačna od narave živil v trdem stanju.
However, when comparing two different drinks, their physical condition should not be conclusive: milk (Class 29) is not of the same nature as an alcoholic beverage (Class 33).
Vendar pri primerjavi dveh pijač ne sme biti odločilno njuno fizikalno stanje: mleko (razred 29) ni enake narave kot alkoholna pijača (razred 33).
Yoghurt is marketed both in solid and liquid form.
Jogurt se trži v trdni in tekoči obliki.
However, the nature of this good is not defined by its physical condition, but - as mentioned above - by its basic ingredient (milk).
Vendar narava tega izdelka ni opredeljena z njegovim fizikalnim stanjem, temveč - kot je navedeno zgoraj - z njegovo osnovno sestavino (mleko).
In both cases, the nature of a solid yogurt and of a liquid yogurt is the same (a milk product).
V obeh primerih je narava trdnega jogurta in tekočega jogurta enaka (mlečni izdelek).
3.2.1.3 Nature of services
Narava storitev
When defining the nature of services, the composition of features, functioning principle and physical condition cannot be used since services are intangible.
Pri opredelitvi narave storitev ni mogoče uporabiti skupka lastnosti, načela delovanja in fizikalnega stanja, ker so storitve neopredmetene.
The nature of services can be defined, in particular, by the kind of activity provided to third parties.
Naravo storitev je mogoče opredeliti zlasti z vrsto dejavnosti, ki se zagotavlja tretjim osebam.
In most cases, it is the category under which the service falls that defines its nature.
V večini primerov naravo storitev določa kategorija, v katero spadajo.
Taxi services (Class 39) have the same nature as bus services (Class 39) as they are both transport services.
Taksi storitve (razred 39) imajo enako naravo kot storitve avtobusnega prevoza (razred 39), saj gre v obeh primerih za prevozne storitve.
3.2.1.4 Nature of goods versus nature of services
Narava blaga v primerjavi z naravo storitev
By their nature, goods are generally dissimilar to services.
Blago se od storitev običajno razlikuje po svoji naravi.
This is because goods are articles of trade, wares or merchandise.
To pa zato, ker blago vključuje trgovsko blago, proizvode ali prodajne izdelke.
Their sale usually entails the transfer in title of something physical.
Njegova prodaja običajno vključuje prenos lastninske pravice na nekem predmetu.
Services, however, consist of the provision of intangible activities.
Storitve pa pomenijo zagotavljanje neopredmetenih dejavnosti.
3.2.2 Intended purpose
Predvideni namen
‘Purpose' is generally defined as ‘the reason for which something is done or made, or for which it exists' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition).
„Namen“ je običajno opredeljen kot razlog, zaradi katerega se nekaj dela ali ustvarja ali zaradi katerega nekaj obstaja (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
As a Canon factor, purpose means the intended use of the goods or services and not any other possible use.
Namen kot dejavnik iz sodbe v zadevi Canon pomeni predvideno uporabo blaga ali storitev in ne drugo možno uporabo.
A plastic bag can be used as protection against the rain.
Plastično vrečko je mogoče uporabiti kot zaščito pred dežjem.
However, its intended purpose is to carry items.
Njen predvideni namen pa je prenašanje predmetov.
The purpose is defined by the function of the goods/services.
Namen je opredeljen s funkcijo blaga ali storitev.
In other words, it answers the questions: What need do these goods/services satisfy?
Z drugimi besedami, daje odgovor na vprašanji: Kaj morajo to blago ali storitve zadovoljiti?
What problem do they solve?
Katero težavo rešujejo?
It is sometimes difficult to determine the proper level of abstraction in order to determine the purpose.
Včasih je težko določiti ustrezno raven abstraktnosti za opredelitev namena.
As in the case of defining the nature, the purpose must be defined in a sufficiently narrow way.
Tako kot naravo je treba tudi namen določiti dovolj ozko.
In the case of vinegar, the intended purpose should not be defined as ‘human consumption', which is the general purpose that all foodstuffs share, but as ‘everyday seasoning'.
Pri kisu se predvideni namen ne sme opredeliti kot „prehrana ljudi“, kar je skupni splošni namen vseh živil, temveč kot „vsakdanja začimba“.
The method of use determines the way in which the goods/services are used to achieve their purpose.
Način uporabe določa, kako se blago ali storitve uporabljajo za dosego svojega namena.
The question to be asked is: How are these goods/services used?
Postaviti je treba naslednje vprašanje: Kako se blago ali storitve uporabljajo?
Method of use often follows directly from the nature and/or intended purpose of the goods/services and therefore has little or no significance of its own in the similarity analysis.
Način uporabe pogosto izhaja neposredno iz narave in/ali predvidenega namena blaga ali storitev in je zato sam po sebi pri analizi podobnosti malo pomemben oziroma sploh ni pomemben.
The method of use of newspapers and books is the same in the sense that they are both read.
Način uporabe časopisov in knjig je enak v smislu, da se oboje bere.
However, similarity can already be concluded from the facts that they are both printed matter (same nature) and that they both serve to entertain or to inform (same purpose).
Vendar je o podobnosti mogoče sklepati že iz dejstev, da gre v obeh primerih za tiskovino (enaka narava) in da se oboje uporablja za zabavo ali obveščanje (enak namen).
Notwithstanding the explanation above, the method of use may be important, independent of nature and purpose, where it characterises the goods.
Ne glede na zgoraj navedeno razlago pa je lahko način uporabe pomemben neodvisno od narave in namena, če označuje blago.
Pharmaceutical preparations for treating skin diseases in Class 5 can take the form of creams.
Farmacevtski pripravki za zdravljenje kožnih bolezni iz razreda 5 so lahko v obliki krem.
They have the same method of use as cosmetic creams in Class 3.
Imajo enak način uporabe kot kozmetične kreme iz razreda 3.
However, even where the method of use characterises the goods under comparison and where it is identical for both goods, this fact alone will not be sufficient to establish similarity.
Vendar če je način uporabe značilen za blago, ki se primerja, in če je enak za obe vrsti blaga, to samo po sebi ne bo zadostovalo za ugotovitev podobnosti.
Chewing gum (Class 30) and chewing tobacco (Class 34) have an identical method of use.
Žvečilni gumi (razred 30) in tobak za žvečenje (razred 34) imata enak način uporabe.
However, this fact alone does not make them similar.
Vendar si le zaradi tega še nista podobna.
3.2.4 Complementarity
Dopolnjevanje
Goods (or services) are complementary if there is a close connection between them, in the sense that one is indispensable (essential) or important (significant) for the use of the other in such a way that consumers may think that responsibility for the production of those goods or provision of those services lies with the same undertaking (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40; 21/11/2012, T558/11, Artis, EU:T:2012:615, § 25; 04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 44).
Proizvodi (ali storitve) se med seboj dopolnjujejo, če med njimi obstaja tesna povezava v tem smislu, da je eden neobhodno potreben (nujen) ali pomemben (ključen) za uporabo drugega, tako da lahko potrošniki sklepajo, da oba proizvoda izdeluje oziroma obe storitvi opravlja isto podjetje (11/05/2011, T74/10, Flaco, EU:T:2011:207, § 40; 21/11/2012, T558/11, Artis, EU:T:2012:615, § 25; 04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 44).
The complementary relation between the goods/services can be, for example, functional.
Dopolnjevalni odnos med proizvodi ali storitvami je lahko na primer funkcionalen.
Internet site hosting services in Class 42 cannot exist without computer programming services in Class 42.
Gostovanje spletnih strani na internetu iz razreda 42 ne more obstajati brez računalniškega programiranja iz razreda 42.
There is a functional complementarity between those services, which, by their nature, belong to the field of information technology.
Med tema storitvama, ki po svoji naravi spadata na področje informacijske tehnologije, obstaja funkcionalen dopolnjevalni odnos.
Moreover, these services are aimed at the same public and use the same distribution channels.
Poleg tega sta storitvi namenjeni isti javnosti in uporabljata iste distribucijske poti.
They are therefore similar (29/09/2011, T150/10, Loopia, EU:T:2011:552, § 36, 43).
Zato sta si podobni (29/09/2011, T150/10, Loopia, EU:T:2011:552, § 36, 43).
By definition, goods intended for different publics cannot be complementary (22/06/2011, T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30; 12/07/2012, T361/11, Dolphin, EU:T:2012:377, § 48).
Blago, namenjeno različnima javnostma, po definiciji ne more biti dopolnjevalno (22/06/2011, T76/09, Farma Mundi Farmaceuticos Mundi, EU:T:2011:298, § 30; 12/07/2012, T361/11, Dolphin, EU:T:2012:377, § 48).
See also paragraph 3.3.1 below.
Glej tudi odstavek 3.3.1 v nadaljevanju.
Textile products in Class 24 (aimed at the public at large) and treatment services relating to textile products in Class 40 (aimed at professionals) cannot be complementary (16/05/2013, T80/11, Ridge Wood, EU:T:2013:251, § 28-32).
Tekstilni izdelki iz razreda 24 (namenjeni širši javnosti) in storitve obdelave tekstilnih izdelkov iz razreda 40 (namenjene strokovnjakom) ne morejo biti dopolnjevalni (16/05/2013, T80/11, Ridge Wood, EU:T:2013:251, § 28-32).
These goods and services are not similar.
Ti proizvodi in storitve niso podobni.
Complementarity is not usually conclusive on its own for finding similarity between goods and/or services.
Dopolnjevanje samo po sebi običajno ni odločilno za ugotovitev podobnosti med proizvodi in/ali storitvami.
Even where a degree of complementarity exists, goods and/or services may be dissimilar.
Tudi če obstaja določena stopnja dopolnjevanja, si proizvodi in/ali storitve morda niso podobni.
There is a degree of complementarity between wine (Class 33) and wineglasses (Class 21) insofar as wineglasses are intended to be used for drinking wine.
Med vinom (razred 33) in kozarci za vino (razred 21) je neka stopnja dopolnjevanja, saj so kozarci za vino namenjeni pitju vina.
However, that complementarity is not sufficiently pronounced to conclude that these goods are similar.
Vendar to dopolnjevanje ni dovolj izrazito za ugotovitev, da je to blago podobno.
Furthermore, these goods are not of the same nature or usual origin nor do they usually share distribution channels (12/06/2007, T105/05, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:T:2007:170, § 34; confirmed 07/05/2009, C398/07 P, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:C:2009:288, § 45).
Poleg tega to blago ni enake narave ali običajnega izvora, poleg tega običajno nima enakih distribucijskih poti (12/06/2007, T105/05, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:T:2007:170, § 34; potrjena 07/05/2009, C398/07 P, Waterford Stellenbosch, EU:C:2009:288, § 45).
However, when complementarity between goods/services has been found in combination with other factors, such as ‘usual origin' and/or ‘distribution channel', similarity may be found.
Če pa je bilo dopolnjevanje med proizvodi ali storitvami ugotovljeno v kombinaciji z drugimi dejavniki, kot so „običajni izvor“ in/ali „distribucijska pot“, je podobnost mogoče ugotoviti.
Skis (Class 28) and ski boots (Class 25) are complementary because the use of one is indispensable for the use of the other.
Smuči (razred 28) in smučarski čevlji (razred 25) se dopolnjujejo, ker je uporaba enih nepogrešljiva za uporabo drugih.
The relevant public may think that the production of these goods lies with the same undertaking.
Upoštevna javnost bi lahko mislila, da ta dva proizvoda proizvaja isto podjetje.
In addition, they share the same public and distribution channels.
Poleg tega si delita isto javnost in distribucijske poti.
These goods are consequently considered similar.
Ta proizvoda se zato štejeta za podobna.
Teaching materials in Classes 9 and 16 (such as printed matter, pre-recorded data carriers and audio/video cassettes) are essential and thus complementary to educational courses in Class 41.
Material za učenje ali poučevanje iz razredov 9 in 16 (kot so tiskovine, vnaprej posneti podatkovni nosilci in avdiokasete ali videokasete) je nujen za izobraževalne tečaje iz razreda 41 in jih zato dopolnjuje.
Generally the materials are issued by the same undertaking, and share the same public and distribution channels.
Običajno ga izdaja isto podjetje ter si deli isto javnost in distribucijske poti.
These goods are similar to the services in question (23/10/2002, T388/00, ELS, EU:T:2002:260).
To blago je podobno zadevnim storitvam (23/10/2002, T388/00, ELS, EU:T:2002:260).
Services of an architect (designing of buildings) (Class 42) are indispensable for building construction (Class 37).
Arhitekturne storitve (načrtovanje stavb) (razred 42) so nepogrešljive za stavbeništvo (razred 37).
These services are often offered together through the same distribution channels, by the same providers and to the same public.
Te storitve se pogosto ponujajo skupaj, in sicer jih ponujajo isti izvajalci po istih distribucijskih poteh isti javnosti.
Consequently, these services are complementary and similar (09/04/2014, T144/12, Comsa / COMSA S.A., EU:T:2014:197, § 65-67).
Zato se te storitve dopolnjujejo in so podobne (09/04/2014, T144/12, Comsa / COMSA S.A., EU:T:2014:197, § 65-67).
3.2.4.1 Use in combination: not complementary
Uporaba v kombinaciji: nedopolnjevalno
Complementarity has to be clearly distinguished from use in combination where goods/services are merely used together, whether by choice or convenience (e.g. bread and butter).
Dopolnjevanje je treba jasno razlikovati od uporabe v kombinaciji, ko se blago ali storitve le uporabljajo skupaj, po izbiri ali zaradi priročnosti (npr. kruh in maslo).
This means that they are not essential for each other (16/12/2013, R 634/20134, ST LAB (fig.) / ST et al., § 20).
To pomeni, da drug za drugega niso nujni (16/12/2013, R 634/20134, ST LAB (fig.) / ST et al., § 20).
In such cases similarity can only be found on the basis of other factors, not on complementarity.
V takšnih primerih je mogoče podobnost ugotoviti samo na podlagi drugih dejavnikov, ne na podlagi dopolnjevanja.
Even if the functioning of transmission belts in Class 12 can be measured with the help of a device for motor-vehicle testing in Class 9, this does not mean that the goods are complementary.
Čeprav se lahko delovanje pogonskih jermenov iz razreda 12 meri z napravo za preizkušanje avtomobilskih vozil iz razreda 9, to ne pomeni, da se zadevno blago dopolnjuje.
It can be convenient in certain cases to measure the performance of one or the other parameter but simple convenience is not sufficient to conclude that one product is indispensable for the other (03/10/2013, R 1011/20124, SUN (fig.) / SUN (fig.) et al., § 39).
V nekaterih primerih je lahko priročno, da se meri učinkovitost enega ali drugega parametra, vendar le priročnost ne zadostuje za ugotovitev, da je en proizvod nepogrešljiv za drugega (03/10/2013, R 1011/20124, SUN (fig.) / SUN (fig.) et al., § 39).
Certain goods that are often coordinated with each other but do not fall within the scope of other similarity factors were determined by the Court to have ‘aesthetic complementarity' (01/03/2005, T169/03, Sissi Rossi, EU:T:2005:72, § 62; 11/07/2007, T150/04, Tosca Blu, EU:T:2007:214, § 35-39; 11/07/2007, T443/05, Pirañam, EU:T:2007:219, § 49-50; 20/10/2011, T214/09, Cor II, EU:T:2011:612, § 32-37).
Sodišče je za nekatero blago, ki se pogosto medsebojno usklajuje, vendar ne spada na področje uporabe drugih dejavnikov podobnosti, določilo, da ima „estetsko dopolnjevanje“ (01/03/2005, T169/03, Sissi Rossi, EU:T:2005:72, § 62; 11/07/2007, T150/04, Tosca Blu, EU:T:2007:214, § 35-39; 11/07/2007, T443/05, Pirañam, EU:T:2007:219, § 49-50; 20/10/2011, T214/09, Cor II, EU:T:2011:612, § 32-37).
This relationship between the goods falls outside the existing definition of complementarity.
Razmerje med zadevnim blagom ne spada v obstoječo opredelitev dopolnjevanja.
Handbags (Class 18) and clothing (Class 25) are closely connected but not complementary, since one is not essential for the use of the other.
Ročne torbice (razred 18) in oblačila (razred 25) so tesno povezani, vendar se ne dopolnjujejo, ker eno ni nujno potrebno za uporabo drugega.
They are merely often used in combination.
Gre samo za to, da se pogosto uporabljajo v kombinaciji.
They are, however, similar because of the fact that they may well be distributed by the same or linked manufacturers, bought by the same public and can be found in the same sales outlets.
Lahko pa so si podobni, če jih distribuirajo isti ali povezani proizvajalci, če jih kupuje ista javnost in če so na voljo v istih trgovinah.
3.2.4.2 Ancillary goods/services: not complementary
Pomožno blago ali storitve: nedopolnjevalno
When certain goods and/or services only support or supplement another product or service, they are not considered to be complementary within the meaning of the caselaw.
Če nekatero blago in/ali storitve le podpirajo ali dopolnjujejo drug proizvod ali storitev, se v zvezi z njimi ne šteje, da so dopolnjevalni v smislu sodne prakse.
Ancillary goods are typically those used for packaging (e.g. bottles, boxes, cans) or for promotion (e.g. leaflets, posters, price lists).
Pomožno blago je običajno blago, ki se uporablja za embalažo (npr. steklenice, škatle, pločevinke) ali oglaševanje (npr. prospekti, plakati, ceniki).
Equally, goods/services offered for free in the course of a merchandising campaign are usually not similar to the primary product or service.
Poleg tega tudi blago ali storitve, ki se brezplačno ponujajo med trženjem, običajno niso podobne osnovnemu proizvodu ali storitvi.
Organisation and conducting of exhibitions is not similar to printed matter, including event notes (Class 16), since the goods merely serve to promote and announce the specific event.
Organizacija in izvajanje razstav ni podobno tiskovinam, vključno z obvestili o dogodkih (razred 16), ker se blago uporablja le za oglaševanje in napovedovanje specifičnega dogodka.
These goods and services are not complementary.
Ti proizvodi in storitve niso dopolnjevalni.
Herbal nutritional supplements in Class 5 are not indispensable or important for the use of beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups and other preparations for making beverages in Class 32.
Zeliščna prehranska dopolnila iz razreda 5 niso nepogrešljiva ali pomembna za uporabo piva, mineralne in gazirane vode in drugih brezalkoholnih pijač, sadnih sokov [pijač], sirupov in drugih preparatov za izdelavo pijač iz razreda 32.
Any combined consumption of those products is merely ancillary.
Vsakršno kombinirano uživanje teh proizvodov je le pomožno.
Therefore, these goods are not complementary.
Ti proizvodi zato niso dopolnjevalni.
Furthermore, since their purpose, distribution channels and usual producers are different, and they are not in competition, these goods are not similar (23/01/2014, T221/12, Sun fresh, EU:T:2014:25, § 84).
Ker so poleg tega njihov namen, distribucijske poti in običajni proizvajalci različni ter ker si niso konkurenčni, si niso podobni (23/01/2014, T221/12, Sun fresh, EU:T:2014:25, § 84).
3.2.4.3 Raw materials, parts, components and fittings: not complementary
Surovine, sestavni deli, komponente in spojni elementi: nedopolnjevalno
Lastly, where the goods concern raw materials, the complementarity criterion is not applicable in the analysis of similarity.
Nazadnje, če se blago nanaša na surovine, se merilo dopolnjevanja v analizi podobnosti ne uporablja.
Raw materials as a significantly important basic component of an end product may be found similar to that product, but not on the basis of complementarity.
Lahko se ugotovi, da so surovine kot bistveno pomembna osnovna komponenta končnega proizvoda podobne navedenemu proizvodu, vendar ne na podlagi dopolnjevanja.
Similar considerations apply to parts, components and fittings (see also Annex I, paragraphs 1 and 2, and Annex II, paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2).
Podobni premisleki se uporabljajo za sestavne dele, komponente in spojne elemente (glej tudi odstavka 1 in 2 Priloge I ter odstavka 5.1 in 5.2 Priloge II).
Plastic or synthetic products used as raw or semi-finished material (in Classes 1 and 17) cannot be regarded as complementary to finished products (made from these materials in Classes 9 and 12) on the ground that the raw materials are intended to be turned into the finished products (09/04/2014, T288/12, Zytel, EU:T:2014:196, § 39).
V zvezi s plastičnimi materiali ali sintetičnimi izdelki, ki se uporabljajo kot surovine ali polizdelki (v razredih 1 in 17), se ne more šteti, da dopolnjujejo končne proizvode (izdelane iz teh materialov v razredih 9 in 12), saj je namen surovin ta, da se preoblikujejo v končne proizvode (09/04/2014, T288/12, Zytel, EU:T:2014:196, § 39).
3.2.5 In competition
Medsebojna konkurenčnost
Goods/services are in competition with each other when one can substitute the other.
Blago ali storitve so si medsebojno konkurenčne, če lahko ena nadomesti drugo.
That means that they serve the same or a similar purpose and are offered to the same actual and potential customers.
To pomeni, da imajo enak ali podoben namen ter da se zagotavljajo istim dejanskim in morebitnim strankam.
In such a case, the goods/services are also defined as ‘interchangeable' (04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 42).
V takšnem primeru so blago ali storitve opredeljene tudi kot „zamenljive“ (04/02/2013, T504/11, Dignitude, EU:T:2013:57, § 42).
Wallpaper (Class 27) and paints (Class 2) are in competition because both cover or decorate walls.
Tapete (razred 27) in barve in vodni premazi (razred 2) so si med seboj konkurenčni, ker se oboje uporablja za prekrivanje ali oblaganje sten.
Rental of movies (Class 41) and services of a cinema (Class 41) are in competition because they both allow you to watch a film.
Izposoja filmov (razred 41) in kino gledališča (razred 41) so si med seboj konkurenčni, saj oboje omogoča ogled filmov.
Electric shavers and razor blades (both in Class 8) are in competition because they serve the same purpose.
Električni brivski aparati in rezila za britev (oboje razred 8) so si med seboj konkurenčni, ker imajo enak namen.
In some cases the price of goods/services in competition may differ significantly, but this fact alone does not affect the analysis of whether they are in competition with each other or not.
V nekaterih primerih se lahko cene konkurenčnega blaga ali storitev zelo razlikujejo, vendar le to dejstvo ne vpliva na analizo, ali so si blago ali storitve konkurenčne ali ne.
Jewellery made of gold and fashion jewellery (both in Class 14) are in competition even though their price (and value) may greatly differ.
Nakit iz zlata in bižuterija (oboje razred 14) sta si med seboj konkurenčna, čeprav se lahko njuna cena (in vrednost) zelo razlikujeta.
[4: Fashion/costume jewellery is understood to be jewellery made from inexpensive metals and imitation gems or semi-precious stones, worn for decorative purposes.]
[4: Razume se, da je bižuterija nakit iz cenenih kovin in imitacij dragih kamnov ali poldragih kamnov, ki se nosi za okras.]
3.2.6 Distribution channel
Distribucijska pot
Although ‘distribution channel' is not explicitly mentioned in the Canon judgment, it is widely used internationally and nationally in the assessment of whether two goods/services are similar.
Čeprav „distribucijska pot“ v sodbi v zadevi Canon ni izrecno navedena, se na mednarodni in nacionalni ravni pogosto uporablja pri presoji, ali sta si dva proizvoda ali storitvi podobni.