natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although the Nice Classification gives some general explanations to this effect in its introductory remarks, it refrains from clearly setting criteria for the distinction between goods and services.
Čeprav Nicejska klasifikacija v ta namen vsebuje nekaj splošnih pojasnil v uvodnih opombah, pa ne vsebuje jasnih meril za razlikovanje med blagom in storitvami.
In principle, the word ‘goods' refers to any kind of item that may be traded.
Beseda „blago“ se načeloma nanaša na vsak predmet, s katerim je mogoče trgovati.
Goods comprise raw materials (unprocessed plastics in Class 1), semi-finished products (plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture in Class 17) and finished products (plastic household containers in Class 21).
Blago obsega surovine (umetne snovi v surovem stanju v razredu 1), polizdelke (ekstrudirana plastika za proizvodnjo v razredu 17) in končne izdelke (plastična posoda za gospodinjstvo v razredu 21).
They include natural and manufactured goods, such as agricultural products in Class 31 and machines and machine tools in Class 7.
Vključuje naravne dobrine in proizvedeno blago, kot so na primer poljedelski proizvodi v razredu 31 ter stroji in orodni stroji v razredu 7.
However, sometimes it is not clear whether goods comprise only tangible physical products as opposed to services, which are intangible.
Vendar včasih ni jasno, ali blago vključuje samo opredmetene fizične proizvode v nasprotju s storitvami, ki so neopredmetene.
The definition and thus the scope of protection are particularly relevant when it comes to ‘goods', such as electricity, that are intangible.
Opredelitev in s tem obseg varstva sta zlasti pomembna pri „blagu“, kot je električna energija, ki je neopredmetena.
This question is already answered during the examination on classification and will not usually cause any problems in the comparison of goods and services.
Odgovor na to vprašanje da že preverjanje razvrstitve in običajno ne povzroča težav pri primerjavi blaga in storitev.
1.4.2 Services
Storitve
A service is any activity or benefit that one party can offer to another that is intangible and does not result in the transfer of ownership of any physical object.
Storitev je vsaka dejavnost ali korist, ki jo lahko ena stranka zagotovi drugi, ki je neopredmetena in ki ni rezultat prenosa lastništva fizičnega predmeta.
In contrast to goods, a service is always intangible.
Storitev je v nasprotju z blagom vedno neopredmeteno sredstvo.
Importantly, services comprise economic activities provided to third parties.
Poudariti je treba, da storitve zajemajo gospodarske dejavnosti, ki se zagotavljajo tretjim osebam.
Advertising one's own goods is not a service but running an advertising agency (designing advertising campaigns for third parties) is.
Oglaševanje svojega blaga ni storitev, je pa storitev vodenje oglaševalske agencije (oblikovanje oglaševalskih akcij za tretje osebe).
Similarly shop window dressing is only a service when provided for third parties, not when done in one's own shop.
Podobno je aranžiranje izložb storitev le, kadar se zagotavlja za tretje osebe, ne pa, kadar se opravlja v lastni trgovini.
Selling or distributing one's own goods is not a service.
Prodaja ali distribucija svojega blaga ni storitev.
Retail services are meant to cover the services around the actual sale of goods, such as providing the customer with an opportunity to conveniently see, compare or test the goods.
Storitve na drobno zajemajo storitve v povezavi z dejansko prodajo blaga, kot je zagotovitev možnosti stranki, da si ustrezno ogleda blago, ga primerja ali preskusi.
For more detailed information, see Annex II, paragraph 7, Retail Services.
Za podrobnejše informacije glej Prilogo II, odstavek 7, Storitve prodaje na drobno.
One indication for an activity to be considered a service under trade mark law is its independent economic value, that is to say, it is usually provided in exchange for some form of (monetary) compensation.
Eden od znakov, da se dejavnost šteje za storitev v skladu z zakonodajo o znamki, je njena neodvisna tržna vrednost, to je, da se običajno zagotavlja v zameno za nekakšno (denarno) obliko nadomestila.
Otherwise, it could be a mere ancillary activity provided together with or after the purchase of a specific product.
Sicer bi lahko bila le pomožna dejavnost, ki se zagotovi z nakupom nekega proizvoda ali po njem.
Delivery, including the transport of furniture that has previously been purchased (either in a physical establishment or online), is not an independent service falling under transport services in Class 39.
Dostava, ki vključuje prevoz predhodno kupljenega pohištva (v fizični prodajalni ali na spletu), ni neodvisna storitev, ki bi spadala pod prevozniške storitve iz razreda 39.
However, the intention to make profit is not necessarily a criterion for defining whether an activity can qualify as a ‘service' (09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 16-18).
Vendar ustvarjanje dobička ni nujno merilo za določitev, da je mogoče neko dejavnost opredeliti kot „storitev“ (glej sodbo 09/12/2008, C442/07, Radetzky, EU:C:2008:696, § 16-18).
It is more a question of whether the service has an independent market area and targeted public rather than the way or form in which compensation is made for it.
Bolj pomembno je vprašanje, ali ima storitev neodvisen trg in ciljno javnost, in ne način ali oblika nadomestila.
In common parlance the term ‘products' is used for both goods and services, for example, ‘financial products' instead of financial services.
Izraz „proizvodi“ se v vsakdanjem jeziku uporablja tako za blago kot za storitve, na primer „finančni produkti“ namesto finančne storitve.
Whether terms in common parlance are described as ‘products' is immaterial to them being classified as goods or services.
Če so izrazi v vsakdanjem jeziku opisani kot „proizvodi“, je njihova razvrstitev kot blago ali storitev nepomembna.
1.5 Determining the goods/services
Določitev blaga ali storitev
1.5.1 The correct wording
Ustrezno besedilo
As a preliminary, the correct wording of the lists of goods/services under consideration must be identified.
Najprej je treba opredeliti ustrezno besedilo seznamov blaga ali storitev, ki se obravnavajo.
1.5.1.1 European Union trade marks
Blagovne znamke Evropske unije
An application for an EUTM will be published in all the official languages of the European Union (Article 147(1) EUTMR).
Prijava za blagovno znamko EU se objavi v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije (člen 147(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Likewise, all entries in the Register of European Union trade marks (the Register) will be in all these languages (Article 147(2) EUTMR).
Podobno se v vseh teh jezikih izvedejo vsi vpisi v register blagovnih znamk Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: register) (člen 147(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).
Both applications and entries in the Register are published in the EUTM Bulletin (Article 116(1)(a) and Article 116(2) EUTMR).
Prijave in vpisi v register se objavijo v Biltenu (člen 116(1)(a) in (2) Uredbe o blagovnih znamkah EU).
In practice, occasional discrepancies may be found between:
V praksi se lahko občasno najdejo neskladnosti med:
the translation of the wording of the list of goods and/or services of an EUTM (application or registration) published in the EUTM Bulletin, and
prevodom besedila seznama blaga in/ali storitev blagovne znamke EU (za prijave ali registracije), objavljenim v Biltenu, in
the original wording as filed.
izvirnim besedilom, kot je bilo vloženo.
In cases of such discrepancy, the definitive version of the list of goods and services is:
V primeru takšnih neskladnosti je končna različica seznama blaga in storitev:
the text in the first language, if the first language is one of the five languages of the Office.
besedilo v prvem jeziku, če je prvi jezik eden od petih uradnih jezikov Urada,
the text in the second language indicated by the applicant (Article 147(3) EUTMR), if the first language of the application is not one of the five languages of the Office.
besedilo v drugem jeziku, ki ga navede prijavitelj (člen 147(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), če prvi jezik prijave ni eden od petih uradnih jezikov Urada.
This applies regardless of whether the EUTM (or EUTM application) is the earlier right or the contested application.
To velja ne glede na to, ali je blagovna znamka EU (ali prijava blagovne znamke EU) prejšnja pravica ali izpodbijana prijava.
Where an incorrect translation of the list of goods and services is detected in an EUTM application that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of the goods and services, the list will either be sent for translation again or, in clear-cut cases, changed directly in the Register.
Če se v prijavi blagovne znamke EU odkrije nepravilen prevod seznama blaga ali storitev, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo seznam vnovič poslan v prevod ali - v jasnih primerih - spremenjen neposredno v registru.
The Office will take its decisions on the basis of the correct translation.
Urad bo sprejel odločitve na podlagi pravilnega prevoda.
Where an incorrect translation is detected in a registered EUTM, the Office will explain which language version of the goods and services is the definitive version for the purposes of the comparison.
Če se nepravilen prevod odkrije v registrirani blagovni znamki EU, bo Urad pojasnil, katera jezikovna različica blaga in storitev je za namene primerjave končna različica.
1.5.1.2 Earlier national marks and international registrations
Prejšnje nacionalne znamke in mednarodne registracije
The list of goods and services of the earlier marks on which the opposition is based must be submitted in the language of the opposition proceedings (Article 7(4) EUTMDR).
Seznam blaga in storitev prejšnjih znamk, na katerih temelji ugovor, je treba predložiti v jeziku postopka ugovora (člen 7(4) Delegirane uredbe).
The Office does not require any certified translation; it accepts simple translations, drawn up by the opponent or its representative.
Urad ne zahteva overjenega prevoda in sprejme preproste prevode, ki jih opravi vložnik ugovora ali njegov zastopnik.
The Office normally does not exercise the option available under Article 26 EUTMIR of requiring the translation to be certified by a sworn or official translator.
Urad običajno ne uveljavi možnosti, ki jo ima na voljo na podlagi člena 26 Izvedbene uredbe in v skladu s katero lahko zahteva, da prevod overi zapriseženi ali uradni prevajalec.
Where the representative adds a declaration that the translation is true to the original, the Office will in principle not question this.
Če zastopnik priloži izjavo, da je prevod v skladu z izvirnikom, Urad o tem načeloma ne bo podvomil.
For international registrations under the Madrid Agreement or Protocol, the language in which the international registration was registered is definitive (French, English or Spanish).
Za mednarodne registracije na podlagi Madridskega sporazuma ali protokola je jezik, v katerem je registrirana mednarodna registracija, določen (francoščina, angleščina ali španščina).
However, where the language of the opposition procedure is not the language of the international registration, a translation must be supplied, as for earlier national marks.
Vendar če jezik postopka ugovora ni jezik mednarodne registracije, je treba kot za prejšnje nacionalne znamke predložiti prevod.
Where a clearly incorrect translation is detected in the list of goods and services covered by the earlier national or international mark that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of goods and services, the opponent may be required under Article 26 EUTMIR to submit a certificate from a sworn or official translator confirming that the translation corresponds to the original.
Če se na seznamu blaga in storitev, zajetih s prejšnjo nacionalno ali mednarodno znamko, odkrije očitno napačen prevod, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo vložnik ugovora v skladu s členom 26 Izvedbene uredbe lahko pozvan, naj predloži potrdilo zapriseženega ali uradnega prevajalca, s katerim se potrjuje, da se prevod ujema z izvirnim besedilom.
Alternatively, in clear-cut cases, the Office may, for the purposes of the decision, replace a clearly incorrect translation of a certain term by a correct translation, adding an explanation to that effect.
Druga možnost je, da Urad v jasnih primerih za namene sprejetja odločitve očitno napačen prevod nekega izraza nadomesti s pravilnim prevodom in v zvezi s tem doda pojasnilo.
For example, where the term ‘bars' in Class 43 is translated as barras de cereales (cereal bars), it is a clearly incorrect translation as this term could never fall within Class 43.
Na primer, če je izraz ploščice v razredu 19 preveden kot žitne ploščice, je to očitno napačen prevod, saj ta izraz ne bi nikoli spadal v razred 19.
1.5.2 The relevant scope
Zadevni obseg
Comparison of the goods and services must be based on the wording indicated in the respective lists of goods/services.
Primerjava blaga in storitev mora temeljiti na besedilu zadevnih seznamov blaga ali storitev.
Any actual or intended use not stipulated in the list of goods/services is not relevant for this comparison since it is part of the assessment of likelihood of confusion in relation to the goods/services on which the opposition is based and against which it is directed; it is not an assessment of actual confusion or infringement (16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237, § 71).
Dejanska ali predvidena uporaba blaga in storitev, ki v seznamu blaga ali storitev ni določena, ni pomembna za primerjavo, saj je del presoje verjetnosti zmede v zvezi z blagom ali storitvami, na katerih temelji ugovor in zoper katere je usmerjen; to ni presoja dejanske zmede ali kršitve (16/06/2010, T487/08, Kremezin, EU:T:2010:237, § 71).
However, if proof of use of the earlier mark is validly requested and the submitted evidence is sufficient for only part of the goods/services listed, the earlier mark is deemed to be registered for only those goods/services (Article 47(2) EUTMR); consequently, the examination is restricted to those goods/services (see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use).
Če se upravičeno zahteva dokaz o uporabi prejšnje znamke in predložena dokazila zadostujejo samo za del navedenega blaga ali storitev, se za prejšnjo znamko šteje, da je bila registrirana samo za navedeno blago ali storitve (člen 47(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU), zato se preizkus omeji na navedeno blago ali storitve (glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi).
Moreover, in the case of the earlier mark, only the goods and services on which the opposition is validly based are pertinent.
Poleg tega so pri prejšnji znamki pomembni samo blago in storitve, na podlagi katerih je veljavno utemeljen ugovor.
Hence, no account will be taken of goods/services:
Zato ni treba upoštevati blaga ali storitev:
that cannot be taken into account for reasons of admissibility;
ki jih ni mogoče upoštevati zaradi dopustnosti,
that have not been properly substantiated (e.g. only a partial translation of the list of goods/services was filed); or
ki niso bili ustrezno utemeljeni (npr. predložen je bil samo delni prevod seznama blaga ali storitev) ali
on which the opposition is not, or is no longer, based.
na katerih ne temelji ali nič več ne temelji ugovor.
Similarly, only those goods and services of the contested application against which the opposition is directed are taken into consideration.
Podobno se upoštevajo samo blago in storitve izpodbijane prijave, zoper katere je usmerjen ugovor.
Consequently, restrictions applied during the proceedings to either the list of goods/services of the application or the goods/services on which the opposition is based, or both, will limit the goods and services to be compared.
Zato bodo omejitve, uporabljene med postopkom bodisi za seznam blaga ali storitev iz prijave bodisi za blago ali storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor, ali za oboje, omejile blago in storitve, ki jih je treba primerjati.
Furthermore, an analysis of the wording of the list of goods/services might be required to determine the scope of protection of those goods and services.
Poleg tega je mogoče zahtevati analizo besedila seznama blaga ali storitev, da se določi obseg varstva navedenega blaga in storitev.
This is especially true where terms such as in particular, namely, or equivalents are used in order to show the relationship of an individual product with a broader category.
To velja zlasti, kadar se uporabljajo izrazi, kot so zlasti, in sicer ali njune ustreznice, da se pokaže na razmerje posameznega proizvoda s širšo kategorijo.
The term in particular (or for example, such as, including or other equivalent) indicates that the specific goods/services are only examples of items included in the category, and that protection is not restricted to them.
Izraz zlasti (ali na primer, kot je, vključno ali druga ustreznica) kaže na to, da so določeno blago ali storitve samo primeri proizvodov in storitev, vključenih v kategorijo, in da varstvo ni omejeno nanje.
In other words, it introduces a non-exhaustive list of examples (on the use of in particular, see the reference in 09/04/2003, T224/01, Nu-Tride, EU:T:2003:107).
Z drugimi besedami, navedeni izraz uvaja neizčrpen seznam primerov (o uporabi izraza zlasti glej sodbo 09/04/2003, T224/01, Nu-Tride, EU:T:2003:107).
However, the term namely (or exclusively or other equivalent) is exclusive and restricts the scope of the registration to only the specifically listed goods.
Vendar je izraz in sicer (ali izključno ali druga ustreznica) izključen in obseg registracije omejuje samo na posebej navedeno blago.
For example, in the case of chemicals used in industry, namely raw materials for plastics only the raw materials for plastics need to be compared with the goods of the other mark.
Na primer, v primeru kemikalije, ki se uporabljajo v industriji, in sicer surovine za proizvodnjo plastike je treba z blagom druge znamke primerjati samo surovine za proizvodnjo plastike.
The use of commas in the list of goods/services serves to separate items within the same or a similar category.
Vejice se v seznamu blaga ali storitev uporabljajo za ločevanje blaga in storitev v okviru iste ali podobne kategorije.
The use of a semicolon means a separation between terms.
Uporaba podpičja pomeni ločevanje med izrazi.
The separation of terms by different punctuation can lead to changes in their meaning and may lead to a different assessment when comparing the goods/services.
Ločevanje izrazov z različnimi ločili lahko spremeni njihov pomen in povzroči drugačno presojo pri primerjavi blaga ali storitev.
For more information on punctuation in lists of goods and services, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification.
Za več informacij o ločilih v seznamih blaga in storitev glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev.
For example, in computer software for use with industrial machines; fire extinguishers in Class 9, the inclusion of a semicolon means that the term fire extinguishers must be considered as an independent category of goods, regardless of whether the intention was to protect computer software to be used in the field of industrial machines and fire extinguishers.
Na primer, vključitev podpičja v primeru računalniška programska oprema za uporabo z industrijskimi stroji; gasilni aparati v razredu 9 pomeni, da je treba izraz gasilni aparati obravnavati kot neodvisno kategorijo blaga, ne glede na to, ali je bil namen zaščititi računalniško programsko opremo za uporabo na področju industrijskih strojev in gasilnih aparatov.
An analysis of the wording of the list of goods/services is also required where the wording used is not sufficiently clear and precise to enable the competent authorities and economic operators, on that sole basis, to determine the scope of protection, and, consequently, to enable the Office to carry out a proper comparison of those goods and services.
Analiza besedila seznama blaga ali storitev je potrebna tudi, kadar uporabljeno besedilo ni dovolj jasno in natančno, da bi lahko pristojni organi in gospodarski subjekti že na navedeni podlagi določili obseg varstva ter, posledično, da bi lahko Urad opravil ustrezno primerjavo tega blaga in storitev.
In such cases the Office will first verify whether goods or services are considered to be unclear or imprecise due to an incorrect translation of the original list.
Urad bo v takih primerih najprej preveril, ali se zaradi nepravilnega prevoda prvotnega seznama šteje, da so blago ali storitve nejasne ali nenatančne.
If so, the Office will take different steps depending on whether the unclear or imprecise term is contained in the specification of the EUTM (regardless of whether the EUTM (or EUTM application) is the earlier right or the contested application) or of the national or international mark on which the opposition is based.
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, bo Urad ukrepal različno, odvisno od tega, ali je nejasen ali nenatančen izraz vključen v podrobno opredelitev blagovne znamke EU (ne glede na to, ali je blagovna znamka EU (ali prijava blagovne znamke EU) prejšnja pravica ali izpodbijana prijava) ali nacionalne ali mednarodne znamke, na kateri temelji ugovor.
The provisions contained in paragraphs 1.5.1.1 and 1.5.1.2 above apply.
Uporabljajo se določbe iz odstavkov 1.5.1.1 in 1.5.1.2 zgoraj.
If the lack of clarity and precision is not the result of an incorrect translation but the term is unclear or imprecise in itself, and it prevents the Office from carrying out a proper comparison of the goods and services, then, in the absence of a limitation enabling the Office to clearly determine the exact scope of protection of the vague term, different steps must be taken depending on whether the unclear or imprecise term is contained in the contested mark or the earlier mark.
Če nejasnost in nenatančnost nista rezultat napačnega prevoda, temveč je izraz nejasen ali nenatančen sam po sebi in Uradu onemogoča izvedbo ustrezne primerjave blaga in storitev, je treba zato - če ni omejitve, ki bi Uradu omogočila, da jasno opredeli natančen obseg varstva nejasnega izraza - sprejeti različne ukrepe, odvisno od tega, ali je nejasen ali nenatančen izraz vključen v izpodbijano znamko ali prejšnjo znamko.
Unclear or imprecise term(s) in the list of goods/services covered by the contested mark
Nejasni ali nenatančni izrazi v seznamu blaga ali storitev, zajetih z izpodbijano znamko
Where the contested mark contains a vague term that prevents the Office from carrying out a comparison of goods and services, the Office will reopen examination of the classification of the mark under Article 33 EUTMR and suspend the opposition proceedings accordingly (27/02/2014, T229/12, Vogue, EU:T:2014:95, § 55).
Če izpodbijana znamka vključuje nejasen izraz, ki Uradu onemogoča izvedbo primerjave blaga in storitev, bo Urad znova začel preizkus razvrstitve znamke v skladu s členom 33 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in posledično začasno ustaviti postopek ugovora (27/02/2014, T229/12, Vogue, EU:T:2014:95, § 55).
Unclear or imprecise term(s) in the list of goods and services covered by the earlier mark
Nejasni ali nenatančni izrazi v seznamu blaga ali storitev, zajetih s prejšnjo znamko
Where the Office is unable to clearly determine the exact scope of protection of vague terms, the vagueness of the wording is not a sufficient basis in itself for arguing in support of identity or similarity.
Če Urad ne more jasno opredeliti natančnega obsega varstva nejasnih izrazov, nejasnost besedila sama po sebi ni zadostna podlaga za argumente v podporo enakosti ali podobnosti.