natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant's signature in accordance with Article 63(1) EUTMDR and Article 65 CDIR.
podpis vložnika zahteve v skladu s členom 63(1) Delegirane uredbe in členom 65 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
6.10 Deficiencies
Pomanjkljivosti
Where an application for inspection of the files fails to comply with the requirements concerning the contents of applications, the applicant for inspection will be invited to remedy the deficiencies.
Če zahteva za pregled spisov ni v skladu z zahtevami glede vsebine zahtev, bo vložnik zahteve za pregled pozvan, naj odpravi pomanjkljivosti.
6.11 Fees for inspection and communication of information contained in the files
Vse pristojbine je treba plačati do dneva prejema zahteve za pregled (glej odstavka 6.5 in 6.6 zgoraj).
6.11.1 Communication of information contained in a file
Člen 75 Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Article 2 CDFR in conjunction with Annex (23) CDFR
Za posredovanje informacij iz spisa je treba plačati pristojbino v višini 10 EUR.
6.11.2 Inspection of the files
Člen 74(1) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Article 114(6) and Annex I A(30) EUTMR
Člen 2 Uredbe o pristojbinah za modele Skupnosti in točka 21 Priloge k Uredbi o pristojbinah za modele Skupnosti
A request for inspection of the files on the Office premises is subject to payment of a fee of EUR 30.
Člen 114(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in točka A(31)(a) Priloge I k Uredbi o blagovni znamki EU
Article 114(7) and Annex I A (31)(a) EUTMR
Člen 74(4) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Where inspection of a file is obtained through the issuing of uncertified copies of file documents, those copies are subject to payment of a fee of EUR 10 plus EUR 1 for every page exceeding ten.
Če se pregled spisov opravi z izdajo neoverjenih kopij dokumentov iz spisov, je treba za te kopije plačati pristojbino v višini 10 EUR in še 1 EUR za vsako stran, ki presega deset strani.
Article 51(2) EUTMR
Člen 51(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 111(7), 114(7) and Annex I A (29)(a) EUTMR
Člen 17(2), člen 69(6) in člen 74(5) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
An uncertified copy of an EUTM application or RCD application, an uncertified copy of the certificate of registration, an uncertified extract from the Register or an uncertified extract of the EUTM application or RCD application from the database is subject to payment of a fee of EUR 10 per copy or extract.
Za neoverjeno kopijo prijave blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti, neoverjeno kopijo potrdila o registraciji, neoverjen izpisek iz registra ali neoverjen izpisek prijave blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti iz podatkovne zbirke je treba plačati pristojbino v višini 10 EUR za posamezno kopijo ali izpisek.
However, registered users of the website can obtain electronic uncertified copies of EUTM or RCD applications or registration certificates free of charge through the website.
Registrirani uporabniki spletišča pa lahko elektronske neoverjene kopije prijav blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti ali potrdil o registraciji prek njega pridobijo brezplačno.
Article 2 and Annex (22) CDFR
Člen 74(4) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Articles 111(7), 114(7) and Annex I A (29)(b) EUTMR
Člen 17(2), člen 69(6) in člen 74(5) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
A certified copy of an EUTM application or RCD application, a certified copy of the certificate of registration, a certified extract from the Register or a certified extract of the EUTM application or RCD application from the database is subject to payment of a fee of EUR 30 per copy or extract.
Za overjeno kopijo prijave blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti, overjeno kopijo potrdila o registraciji, overjen izpisek iz registra ali overjen izpisek prijave blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti iz podatkovne zbirke je treba plačati pristojbino v višini 30 EUR za posamezno kopijo ali izpisek.
6.11.3 Consequences of failure to pay
Člen 114(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
An application for inspection of files will be considered not to have been filed until the fee has been paid.
Dokler pristojbina ni plačana, se šteje, da zahteva za pregled spisov ni bila vložena.
The fees apply not only where the application for inspection has been filed by a third party, but also where it has been filed by the EUTM or RCD applicant or proprietor.
Pristojbine se ne uporabljajo le za zahteve za pregled, ki jih vloži tretja oseba, temveč tudi za tiste zahteve, ki jih vloži prijavitelj ali imetnik blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti.
The Office will not process the inspection application until the fee has been paid.
Urad ne bo obdelal zahteve za pregled, dokler pristojbina ne bo plačana.
However, if the fee is not paid or is not paid in full, the Office will notify the applicant for inspection:
Vendar če pristojbina ni plačana ali ni plačana v celoti, Urad obvesti vložnika zahteve za pregled:
if no payment is received by the Office for a certified or uncertified copy of an EUTM application or RCD application, a certificate of registration or an extract from the Register or from the database;
če ne prejme plačila za overjeno ali neoverjeno kopijo prijave blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti, potrdila o registraciji ali izpiska iz registra ali podatkovne zbirke,
if no payment is received by the Office for inspection of the files obtained through the issuing of certified or uncertified copies of file documents;
če ne prejme plačila za pregled spisov, opravljen z izdajo overjenih ali neoverjenih kopij dokumentov iz spisov,
if no payment is received by the Office for the communication of information contained in a file.
če ne prejme plačila za posredovanje informacij iz spisov.
The Office will issue a letter indicating the amount of fees to be paid.
Urad bo poslal dopis, v katerem navede znesek pristojbine, ki jo je treba plačati.
If the exact amount of the fee is not known to the applicant for inspection because it depends on the number of pages, the Office will either include that information in the standard letter or inform the applicant for inspection by other appropriate means.
Če vložnik zahteve za pregled ni seznanjen z natančnim zneskom pristojbine, ker je ta odvisen od števila strani, bo Urad te informacije vključil v standardni dopis ali vložnika zahteve za pregled obvestil na drug ustrezen način.
6.11.4 Refund of fees
Povračilo pristojbin
Where an application for inspection of the files is rejected, the corresponding fee is not refunded.
Če je zahteva za pregled spisov zavrnjena, zadevna pristojbina ne bo povrnjena.
However, where, after the payment of the fee, the Office finds that not all the certified or uncertified copies requested may be issued (e.g. if the request concerns confidential documents and the applicant has not proven an overriding legitimate interest), any fees paid in excess of the amount actually due will be refunded.
Če pa Urad po plačilu pristojbine ugotovi, da ni mogoče izdati vseh zahtevanih overjenih ali neoverjenih kopij (npr. če se zahteva nanaša na zaupne dokumente in vložnik zahteve ni dokazal prevladujočega legitimnega interesa), bo povrnil morebitne pristojbine, ki presegajo znesek, ki bi ga bilo treba dejansko plačati.
6.12 Requirements concerning the right to obtain inspection of files concerning an unpublished EUTM application, or a deferred RCD filed by a third party
Zahteve glede pravice do pregleda spisov v zvezi z neobjavljeno prijavo blagovne znamke EU ali odloženim registriranim modelom Skupnosti, ki jo uveljavlja tretja oseba
Article 114(1) and (2) EUTMR
Člen 114(1) in (2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 74 CDR
Člen 74 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Article 74(2) CDIR
Člen 74(2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Where an application for inspection of files for an EUTM application that has not yet been published, or for files relating to an RCD subject to deferment of publication in accordance with Article 50 CDR, or for those which, subject to such deferment, have been surrendered before or on the expiry of that period, (see paragraphs 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 above) is filed by a third party (i.e. by a person other than the EUTM or RCD applicant or its representative), different situations may arise.
Če zahtevo za pregled spisov v zvezi s prijavo blagovne znamke EU, ki še ni bila objavljena, ali spisov v zvezi z registriranim modelom Skupnosti, ki je predmet odloga objave v skladu s členom 50 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti ali ki je bil pred iztekom ali ob izteku obdobja odloga objave umaknjen (glej odstavka 4.2.1 in 4.2.2 zgoraj), vloži tretja oseba (to je oseba, ki ni prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU oz. registriranega modela Skupnosti ali njegov zastopnik), lahko nastanejo različne situacije.
If the application by a third party is based on the grounds specified in Article 114(1) and (2) EUTMR (see paragraph 4.2.1 above), or in Article 74(2) CDR or in Article 74(2) CDIR (see paragraph 4.2.2 above), it must contain an indication and evidence to the effect that the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder has consented to the inspection, or has stated that it will invoke the rights under the RCD, once registered, against the applicant for inspection.
Če zahteva tretje osebe temelji na razlogih iz člena 114(1) in (2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (glej odstavek 4.2.1 zgoraj) ali iz člena 74(2) Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti ali člena 74(2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti (glej odstavek 4.2.2 zgoraj), mora vključevati navedbo in dokaze, da je prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelj ali imetnik registriranega modela Skupnosti privolil v pregled ali izjavil, da bo po registraciji modela Skupnosti uveljavljal pripadajoče pravice proti vložniku zahteve za pregled.
6.12.1 Consent
Soglasje
The consent of the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder must be in the form of a written statement in which it consents to the inspection of the particular file(s).
Soglasje prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelja ali imetnika registriranega modela Skupnosti mora biti pisna izjava, v kateri prijavitelj oz. imetnik soglaša s pregledom zadevnega(-ih) spisa(-ov).
Consent may be limited to inspection of certain parts of the file, such as the application, in which case the application for inspection of files may not exceed the scope of the consent.
Soglasje je lahko omejeno na pregled nekaterih delov spisa, kot je prijava, pri čemer zahteva za pregled spisov ne sme presegati obsega soglasja.
Where the applicant for inspection of files does not submit a written statement from the EUTM applicant, RCD applicant or holder consenting to the inspection of the files, the applicant for inspection will be notified and given 2 months from the date of notification to remedy the deficiency.
Če vložnik zahteve za pregled spisov ne predloži pisne izjave prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelja ali imetnika registriranega modela Skupnosti o privolitvi v pregled spisov, bo vložnik zahteve za pregled o tem obveščen in pozvan, naj v dveh mesecih od datuma obvestila odpravi pomanjkljivost.
If, after expiry of the time limit, no consent has been submitted, the Office will reject the application for inspection of files.
Če soglasje po preteku tega roka ni predloženo, bo Urad zavrnil zahtevo za pregled spisov.
The applicant for inspection will be informed of the decision to reject the application for inspection.
Vložnik zahteve za pregled bo obveščen o njeni zavrnitvi.
The decision may be appealed by the applicant for inspection (Articles 67 and 68 EUTMR and Article 56 CDR).
Vložnik zahteve za pregled se lahko zoper to odločitev pritoži (člena 67 in 68 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ter člen 56 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti).
6.12.2 Statement that EUTM or RCD rights will be invoked
Izjava o uveljavljanju pravic iz blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti
Article 114(2) EUTMR
Člen 114(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 74(2) CDR
Člen 74(2) Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Where the application relies on the allegation that the EUTM or RCD proprietor will invoke the rights under the EUTM or RCD, once registered, it is up to the applicant for inspection to prove this allegation.
Če prijava temelji na trditvi, da bo imetnik blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti po registraciji navedene znamke ali modela uveljavljal pripadajoče pravice, mora vložnik zahteve za pregled to trditev dokazati.
Mere assumptions on the part of the applicant for inspection of the file will not constitute sufficient proof.
Le domneve vložnika zahteve za pregled spisa ne bodo zadosten dokaz.
The Office will first examine whether the proof is sufficient.
Urad bo najprej proučil, ali so dokazi zadostni.
If so, the Office will send the application for inspection of files and the supporting documents to the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder and invite it to comment within two months.
Če so, bo Urad prijavitelju blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelju ali imetniku registriranega modela Skupnosti poslal zahtevo za pregled spisov in dokazila ter ga pozval, naj v dveh mesecih predloži pripombe.
If the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder consents to an inspection of the files, it will be granted.
Če prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelj ali imetnik registriranega modela Skupnosti privoli v pregled spisov, bo pregled odobren.
If the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder submits comments contesting inspection of the files, the Office will send the comments to the applicant for inspection.
Če prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelj ali imetnik registriranega modela Skupnosti predloži pripombe, s katerimi nasprotuje pregledu spisov, bo Urad pripombe poslal vložniku zahteve za pregled.
Any further statement by the applicant for inspection will be sent to the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder and vice versa.
Vse nadaljnje trditve vložnika zahteve za pregled bodo poslane prijavitelju blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelju ali imetniku registriranega modela Skupnosti in obratno.
The Office will take into account all submissions made on time by the parties and decide accordingly.
Urad bo upošteval vsa stališča, ki jih stranki predložita pravočasno, in sprejel ustrezno odločitev.
The Office's decision will be notified to both the applicant for inspection of the files and the EUTM applicant or RCD applicant or holder.
O odločitvi Urada bosta obveščena vložnik zahteve za pregled spisov in prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU oz. prijavitelj ali imetnik registriranega modela Skupnosti.
It may be appealed by the adversely affected party (Articles 67 and 68 EUTMR and Article 56 CDR).
Oškodovana stranka se lahko zoper odločitev pritoži (člena 67 in 68 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ter člen 56 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti).
6.13 Grant of inspection of files, means of inspection
Odobritev pregleda spisov, način pregleda
6.13.1 Communication of information contained in a file
Člen 114(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
The Office may, on request, communicate information contained in any file relating to EUTM or RCD applications or registrations.
Urad lahko na zahtevo posreduje informacije iz vseh spisov v zvezi s prijavami ali registracijami blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti.
Information contained in the files will be provided without an application for inspection, inter alia, where the party concerned wishes to know whether a given EUTM application has been filed by a given applicant, the date of such application, or whether the list of goods and services has been amended in the period between the filing of the application and its publication.
Informacije iz spisov bodo zagotovljene brez zahteve za pregled, če želi zadevna stranka med drugim izvedeti, ali je neko prijavo blagovne znamke EU vložil zadevni prijavitelj, datum takšne prijave oziroma ali je bil v obdobju med vložitvijo in objavo prijave spremenjen seznam blaga in storitev.
Having obtained this information, the party concerned may then decide whether or not to request copies of the relevant documents, or to apply for inspection of the file.
Zadevna stranka se lahko po pridobitvi teh informacij nato odloči, ali bo zahtevala kopije ustreznih dokumentov ali vložila zahtevo za pregled spisa.
Where the party concerned wishes to know, inter alia, which arguments an opponent has brought forward in opposition proceedings, which seniority documents have been filed, or the exact wording of the list of goods and services as filed, such information will not be provided.
Če želi zadevna stranka med drugim izvedeti, katere trditve je nasprotna stranka predložila v postopku ugovora, kateri dokumenti o prednosti starejše blagovne znamke so bili vloženi ali vsebino dejanskega besedila seznama blaga in storitev, kot je bilo predloženo, takšne informacije ne bodo zagotovljene.
Instead the Office will advise the party to apply for inspection of the file.
Urad bo namesto tega stranki svetoval, naj vloži zahtevo za pregled spisa.
In such cases, the quantity and complexity of the information to be supplied would exceed reasonable limits and create an undue administrative burden.
V takšnih primerih bi količina in zapletenost informacij, ki jih je treba zagotoviti, presegli razumne okvire in ustvarili nesorazmerno upravno breme.
6.13.2 Copies of file documents
Kopije dokumentov iz spisov
Where inspection of the files is granted in the form of the provision of certified or uncertified copies of file documents, the party will be sent the requested documents.
Če se pregled spisov odobri v obliki predložitve overjenih ali neoverjenih kopij dokumentov iz spisov, bodo zahtevani dokumenti poslani stranki.
Where inspection of files is granted on the Office premises, the applicant will be given an appointment to inspect the files.
Če se pregled spisov odobri v prostorih Urada, bo z vložnikom zahteve dogovorjeno srečanje za pregled spisov.
6.13.3 Specific interest concerning the inspection applicant
Posebno zanimanje za vložnika zahteve za pregled
Where a party shows a specific interest in knowing whether its file has been inspected and by whom, there should be a compromise between the general interest of the public to be able to inspect files of proceedings before the Office with a minimum of formalities and the parties' specific interest to know who has inspected the file in exceptional, duly justified circumstances.
Kadar stranka izkaže posebno zanimanje za to, ali je bil njen spis pregledan in kdo ga je pregledal, bi bilo treba uravnotežiti splošni interes javnosti, da lahko pregleduje spise postopkov pred Uradom s čim manj formalnostmi, s posebnim zanimanjem stranke za to, kdo je pregledal spis, v izjemnih in ustrezno utemeljenih okoliščinah.
Considering that online inspection requests are not communicated as a matter of course to the party whose file has been inspected, that party must put forward a reasoned and substantiated request showing that there are legitimate reasons for being informed if its file has been inspected, and by whom.
Ker se spletne zahteve za pregled po uradni dolžnosti ne posredujejo stranki, katere spis se je pregledal, mora ta stranka predložiti obrazloženo in utemeljeno zahtevo, v kateri pokaže, da ima legitimne razloge za to, da bi vedela, ali je bil njen spis pregledan in kdo ga je pregledal.
The Office will not automatically grant such a request.
Urad take zahteve ne bo samodejno odobril.
Instead, on a case-by-case basis, it will balance these reasons against the explanations provided by the person who made the inspection within a period set by the Office to that effect, before any such request is granted.
Pred tem bo v vsakem posameznem primeru pretehtal, ali ti razlogi prevladajo nad obrazložitvijo osebe, ki je opravila pregled, predloženo v roku, ki ga za to določi Urad.
7 Procedures to Give Access to the Files to Courts or Authorities of the Member States
Postopki za odobritev dostopa do spisov sodiščem ali ustreznim organom držav članic
Articles 20 and 21 EUTMIR
Člen 75 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Articles 77 and 78 CDIR
Člena 20 in 21 Izvedbene uredbe
For the purposes of administrative cooperation, the Office will also, on request, communicate relevant information about the filing of EUTM or RCD applications and proceedings relating to such applications, and the marks or designs registered as a result thereof, to the central industrial property offices of the Member States.
V tem okviru bo glavnim uradom za industrijsko lastnino držav članic na zahtevo posredoval tudi ustrezne informacije o vložitvi prijav blagovne znamke EU ali registriranega modela Skupnosti, postopkih v zvezi s takšnimi prijavami in znamkah ali modelih, registriranih na podlagi teh prijav in postopkov.
7.1 No fees
Oprostitev plačila pristojbin
Article 20(3) and Article 21(1) and (3) EUTMIR
Člen 20(3) ter člen 21(1) in (3) Izvedbene uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 77(3) and Article 78(1) and (2) CDIR
Člen 77(3) ter člen 78(1) in (2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Inspection of files and communication of information from the files requested by the courts or authorities of the Member States are not subject to the payment of fees.
Pristojbine ni treba plačati za pregled spisov in posredovanje informacij iz spisov, ki ju zahtevajo sodišča ali ustrezni organi držav članic.
The Office will not charge any fee for such inspection.
Urad za ta pregled ne bo zaračunal pristojbine.
7.2 No restriction as to unpublished applications
Odsotnost omejitev v zvezi z neobjavljenimi prijavami
Articles 114(4) and 117(1) EUTMR
Člen 114(4) in člen 117(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 20(1) EUTMIR
Člen 20(1) Izvedbene uredbe
Article 75 CDR
Člen 75 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Article 72 and Article 77(1) CDIR
Člen 72 in člen 77(1) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Inspection of files and communication of information from the files requested by the courts or authorities of the Member States is not subject to the restrictions contained in Article 114 EUTMR and Article 74 CDR.
Za pregled spisov in posredovanje informacij iz spisov, ki ju zahtevajo sodišča ali organi držav članic, ne veljajo omejitve iz člena 114 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 74 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
Consequently, these bodies may be granted access to files relating to unpublished EUTM applications (see paragraph 4.2.1 above) and RCDs subject to deferment of publication (see paragraph 4.2.2 above), as well as to parts of the files for which the party concerned has expressed a special interest in keeping confidential.
Zato je mogoče tem organom odobriti dostop do spisov v zvezi z neobjavljenimi prijavami blagovne znamke EU (glej odstavek 4.2.1 zgoraj) in registriranimi modeli Skupnosti, ki so predmet odloga objave (glej odstavek 4.2.2 zgoraj), ter delov spisa, za katere je zadevna stranka izkazala poseben interes za ohranitev njihove zaupnosti.
However, documents relating to exclusion and objection, as well as the documents referred to in Article 114(4) EUTMR and Article 72(b) CDIR, will not be made available to these bodies.
Vendar se tem organom ne dajo na voljo dokumenti v zvezi z izločitvijo in ugovorom ter dokumenti iz člena 114(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 72(b) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti.
Article 21(3) EUTMIR
Člen 21(3) Izvedbene uredbe
Article 72 and Article 78(2) CDIR
Člen 72 in člen 78(2) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti
Courts or public prosecutors' offices of the Member States may open to inspection by third parties files or copies that have been transmitted to them by the Office.
Sodišča ali državna tožilstva držav članic lahko tretjim osebam predložijo v pregled spise ali njihove kopije, ki jih je predložil Urad.
Such subsequent inspection shall be subject to the restrictions contained in Article 114(4) EUTMR or Article 74 CDR, as if the inspection had been requested by a third party.
Za takšen naknadni pregled veljajo omejitve iz člena 114(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU oz. člena 74 Uredbe o modelih Skupnosti, kakor da bi pregled zahtevala tretja oseba.
Article 21(2) EUTMIR
Člen 21(2) Izvedbene uredbe
Article 78(4) CDIR
Člen 78(4) Izvedbene uredbe o modelih Skupnosti