natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vague terms may only be taken into account in their most natural and literal meaning and may not be construed as relating to goods, qualities, properties, methods of use, etc. to which that term is not expressly limited (14/07/2003, R 559/20024, MOBILIX / OBELIX, §17; 02/02/2015, R 391/20144 POWERMATIC / POWRMATIC et al., § 29, 33).
Nejasne izraze je mogoče upoštevati le v njihovem najnaravnejšem in najbolj dobesednem pomenu, pri čemer se ne smejo razlagati, kot da se nanašajo na blago, značilnosti, lastnosti, načine uporabe itd., na katere navedeni izraz ni izrecno omejen (14/07/2003, R 559/20024, MOBILIX / OBELIX, §17; 02/02/2015, R 391/20144 POWERMATIC / POWRMATIC et al., § 29, 33).
Nor may the vague term be interpreted in relation to other goods or services within the same class or different classes.
Poleg tega nejasnega izraza ni mogoče razlagati v zvezi z drugim blagom ali storitvami v istem razredu ali različnih razredih.
For example, when comparing the vague term machines to dual combustion machines for use in agriculture, the vagueness of the term cannot be used on its own for arguing similarity; nor can the term be construed as relating to ‘dual combustion' machines or to machines ‘for use in agriculture' when such qualities and methods of use have not been expressly identified in the specification.
Na primer, če se nejasen izraz stroji primerja z izrazom kmetijski stroji z dvojnim izgorevanjem, se nejasnost izraza sama po sebi ne more uporabiti za trditev o podobnosti; poleg tega se izraz ne sme razlagati, kot da se nanaša na stroje „z dvojnim izgorevanjem“ ali „za uporabo v kmetijstvu“, če takšne značilnosti in načini uporabe niso izrecno opredeljeni v specifikaciji.
Likewise, when comparing a vague term such as giftware of all kinds, such a wide formulation cannot be used by the opponent to argue that the retail of these goods is similar to all kinds of goods in the contested mark, when the opponent could have easily specified the kind of giftware offered for sale.
Podobno, kadar se primerja nejasen izraz darila vseh vrst, vložnik ugovora ne more uporabiti tako široke ubeseditve za zatrjevanje, da je prodaja tega blaga na drobno podobna vsem vrstam blaga, zajetega z izpodbijano blagovno znamko, ko pa bi lahko vložnik ugovora zlahka podrobno opredelil vrsto daril, ki so na prodaj.
In these cases, the comparison will be done on a case-by-case basis.
V takih primer bo primerjava opravljena za vsak primer posebej.
Further examples of general indications and terms and expressions lacking clarity and precision can be found in the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 3, Classification, paragraph 4.2.
Več primerov splošnih označb ter nejasnih in nenatančnih izrazov je na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 3: Razvrstitev, odstavek 4.2.
1.5.3 The meaning of goods/services
Pomen blaga ali storitev
Once the wording of the goods and services to be considered has been identified, its meaning must be determined.
Potem ko je bilo določeno ustrezno besedilo blaga in storitev, ki jih je treba proučiti, je treba določiti njegov pomen.
In some cases, the exact meaning is immediately obvious from the list of goods and/or services of the marks, where a more or less detailed description of the goods and services will often be given.
V nekaterih primerih je točen pomen takoj očiten iz seznama blaga in/ali storitev znamk, pri katerih je pogosto naveden bolj ali manj podroben opis blaga in storitev.
For example, the wording belts, being articles of clothing excludes by definition safety or industrial belts.
Na primer, besedilo pasovi kot oblačila po definiciji izključuje varnostne ali industrijske pasove.
In cases of doubt about the exact meaning of the terms used in the list of goods and/or services, the terms have to be interpreted both in the light of the Nice Classification and from a commercial perspective.
V primeru dvoma glede točnega pomena izrazov, uporabljenih v seznamu blaga in/ali storitev, je treba izraze razlagati v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo in s poslovnega vidika.
Therefore, belts in Class 25 are, due to their classification, articles of clothing.
Zato so pasovi v razredu 25 zaradi svoje razvrstitve oblačila.
Where the meanings of terms in a semantic context, a commercial context and/or under the Nice Classification are ambiguous or leave doubts, the meaning they have under the Nice Classification prevails.
Če je pomen izrazov v semantičnem smislu, poslovnem smislu in/ali v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo nejasen ali dvoumen, prevlada njihov pomen v skladu z Nicejsko klasifikacijo.
However, this does not mean that two general indications in one class heading can never be considered identical.
Vendar to ne pomeni, da dve splošni označbi iz naslova enega razreda nikoli ni mogoče šteti za enaki.
As mentioned above, the structure of the class headings is not uniform.
Kot je bilo že omenjeno, struktura naslovov razredov ni enotna.
Some general indications included in the class headings may encompass others.
Nekatere splošne označbe, vključene v naslove razredov, lahko vključujejo druge.
Meat and poultry are identical (Class 29).
Meso in perutnina sta enaka (razred 29).
1.6 Objective approach
Nepristranski pristop
The comparison of the goods/services in question must be made without taking into account the degree of similarity of the conflicting signs or the distinctiveness of the earlier mark.
Primerjavo zadevnega blaga ali storitev je treba opraviti brez upoštevanja stopnje podobnosti nasprotujočih si znakov ali razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje znamke.
It is only in the overall assessment of a decision that the examiners will take into account all the relevant factors.
Preizkuševalci bodo vse upoštevne dejavnike upoštevali samo v celoviti presoji odločbe.
The classification of the goods or services is not conclusive, because similar goods/services may be classified in different classes, whereas dissimilar goods/services may fall within the same class.
Klasifikacija blaga ali storitev ni dokončna, ker so lahko podobno blago ali storitve uvrščene v različne razrede, različno blago ali storitve pa lahko spadajo v isti razred.
Identity or similarity of the goods/services in question must be determined on an objective basis.
Enakost ali podobnost zadevnega blaga ali storitev je treba določiti na nepristranski podlagi.
It is necessary to base the findings on the realities of the marketplace, such as established customs in the relevant field of industry or commerce.
Ugotovitve je treba utemeljiti na dejanskem stanju na trgu, na primer ob upoštevanju navad in običajev na zadevnem področju industrije ali trgovine.
These customs, especially trade practices, are dynamic and constantly changing.
Te navade in običaji, zlasti poslovne prakse, so dinamični in se nenehno spreminjajo.
For instance, mobile phones nowadays combine many functions, such as being communication tools as well as photographic apparatus.
Na primer, danes mobilni telefoni združujejo več funkcij, so komunikacijsko orodje in fotografski aparat.
The degree of similarity of the goods and services is a matter of law, which must be assessed ex officio by the Office even if the parties do not comment on it (16/01/2007, T53/05, Calvo, EU:T:2007:7, § 59).
Stopnja podobnosti blaga in storitev je vprašanje prava, ki jo mora Urad proučiti po uradni dolžnosti, tudi če stranki ne predložita pripomb o njej (16/01/2007, T53/05, Calvo, EU:T:2007:7, § 59).
However, the Office's ex officio examination is restricted to well-known facts, that is to say, ‘facts which are likely to be known by anyone or which may be learned from generally accessible sources', which excludes facts of a highly technical nature (03/07/2013, T106/12, Alpharen, EU:T:2013:340, § 51).
Vendar je preizkus, ki ga Urad opravi po uradni dolžnosti, omejen na splošno znana dejstva, to je „dejstva, ki jih lahko pozna vsak in jih je mogoče dobiti iz splošno dostopnih virov“, kar izključuje zelo tehnična dejstva (03/07/2013, T106/12, Alpharen, EU:T:2013:340, § 51).
Consequently, what does not follow from the evidence/arguments submitted by the parties or is not commonly known should not be speculated on or extensively investigated ex officio (09/02/2011, T222/09, Alpharen, EU:T:2011:36, § 31-32).
Zato se o tistem, kar ne izhaja iz dokazil/argumentov, ki so jih predložile stranke, ali kar ni splošno znano, ne smejo oblikovati domneve oziroma se to ne sme obširno preiskovati po uradni dolžnosti (09/02/2011, T222/09, Alpharen, EU:T:2011:36, § 31-32).
1.7 Statement of reasons
Obrazložitev
The examiner is required to state reasons for the outcome of the comparison (identity, similarity or dissimilarity) for each of the individual goods and services specified in the application for registration.
Preizkuševalec mora obrazložiti izid primerjave (enakost, podobnost ali različnost) za vsako posamezno blago in storitev iz prijave za registracijo.
However, the examiner may use only general reasoning for groups of the goods or services concerned as long as the goods or services present analogous characteristics (see, by analogy, 18/03/2010, C282/09 P, P@yweb card / Payweb card, EU:C:2010:153, § 37-38; 12/04/2011, T28/10, Euro automatic Payment, EU:T:2011:158, § 54; 17/10/2013, C597/12 P, Zebexir, EU:C:2013:672, § 26-27).
Vendar lahko preizkuševalec za vse zadevno blago ali storitve uporabi samo splošno obrazložitev, če imajo to blago ali storitve podobne značilnosti (glej po analogiji sodbe 18/03/2010, C282/09 P, P@yweb card / Payweb card, EU:C:2010:153, § 37-38; 12/04/2011, T28/10, Euro automatic Payment, EU:T:2011:158, § 54; 17/10/2013, C597/12 P, Zebexir, EU:C:2013:672, § 26-27).
2 Identity
Enakost
2.1 General principles
Splošna načela
Identity is generally defined as ‘the quality or condition of being the same in substance, composition, nature, properties, or in particular qualities under consideration' (Oxford Dictionaries online edition).
Enakost je na splošno opredeljena kot značilnost ali stanje biti enak po snovi, sestavi, naravi, lastnostih in zlasti po obravnavanih značilnostih (spletna izdaja slovarjev Oxford Dictionaries).
Identity exists not only when the goods and services completely coincide (the same terms or synonyms are used), but also when and insofar as the contested mark's goods/services fall within the earlier mark's broader category, or when and insofar as - conversely - a broader term of the contested mark includes the more specific goods/services of the earlier mark.
Enakost ne obstaja samo takrat, kadar se blago in storitve popolnoma ujemajo (ko se uporabljajo isti izrazi ali sinonimi), temveč tudi, kadar in kolikor blago ali storitve izpodbijane znamke spadajo v širšo kategorijo prejšnje znamke ali obratno, če splošnejši izraz izpodbijane znamke vključuje natančneje določeno blago ali storitve prejšnje znamke.
There might also be identity when two broad categories under comparison coincide partially (‘overlap').
Enakost lahko obstaja tudi, če se dve širši kategoriji, ki se primerjata, delno ujemata („prekrivata“).
Hence a distinction can be made between cases of ‘full identity' and ‘partial identity'.
Zato je mogoče razlikovati med primeri popolne in delne enakosti.
Identity should not be established on the basis of similarity factors (see paragraph 3.1.1 below).
Enakost se ne sme ugotoviti na podlagi dejavnikov podobnosti (glej odstavek 3.1.1 v nadaljevanju).
2.2 Identical terms or synonyms
Enaki izrazi ali sinonimi
Identity between the goods/services in dispute must be established on the basis of the wording of the relevant parts of the lists of goods and/or services of the two marks that have been identified in accordance with the principles set out above.
Enakost izpodbijanega blaga ali storitev je treba ugotoviti na podlagi besedila ustreznih delov seznamov blaga in/ali storitev obeh znamk, ki so bili določeni v skladu z zgoraj navedenimi načeli.
Identity is obvious where the goods/services to be compared are listed in exactly the same terms.
Enakost je očitna, če so blago ali storitve, ki se primerjajo, navedene s popolnoma enakimi izrazi.
Vehicles are identical to vehicles.
Vozila so enaka vozilom.
Where this is not the case, the terms of the respective lists of goods and/or services must be interpreted in order to show that they are in fact synonyms, that is to say, that their meaning is the same.
V drugih primerih je treba izraze ustreznih seznamov blaga in/ali storitev razložiti, s čimer se dokaže, da so dejansko sinonimi, tj. da imajo enak pomen.
The interpretation can be made based on dictionary definitions, expressions from the Nice Classification and, in particular, by taking into account the commercial perspective.
Razlago je mogoče utemeljiti na slovarskih opredelitvah, izrazih iz Nicejske klasifikacije in zlasti ob upoštevanju poslovnega vidika.
Bicycle is a synonym for bike.
V angleščini je bicycle (kolo) sinonim za cycle (kolo).
The goods are identical.
Proizvoda sta enaka.
The meaning of the words smokers' articles in Class 34 refers to individual objects that are used in close connection with tobacco or tobacco products.
Pomen besed potrebščine za uporabo s tobakom v razredu 34 vključuje posamezne predmete, ki se uporabljajo v tesni povezavi s tobakom in tobačnimi izdelki.
In former editions of the Nice Classification these products were called smokers' requisites.
Ti izdelki so se v prejšnjih izdajah Nicejske klasifikacije imenovali potrebščine za kadilce.
Therefore, despite a different term used in the current heading, these goods are identical.
Zato je to blago kljub uporabi drugega izraza v sedanjem naslovu enako.
From a commercial perspective, health spa services and wellness services are the same and are therefore identical.
Storitve zdravilišč in velnes storitve so s poslovnega vidika isto, zato so enake.
However, if identical wording is used but the goods are classified in different classes, this generally means that these goods are not identical.
Če se uporabi enako besedilo, vendar je blago uvrščeno v različne razrede, to običajno pomeni, da to blago ni enako.
Drills (machine tools) in Class 7 are not identical to drills (hand tools) in Class 8.
Vrtalniki (orodni stroji) iz razreda 7 niso enaki vrtalnim strojem (ročno orodje) iz razreda 8.
Lasers (not for medical treatment) in Class 9 are not identical to lasers (for curative purposes) in Class 10.
Laserji (razen za medicinske namene) iz razreda 9 niso enaki laserjem (za zdravilne namene) iz razreda 10.
Even though they might be similar, the classification in different classes indicates that they have a different nature, purpose or method of use, etc.
Čeprav bi lahko bili podobni, razvrstitev v različne razrede kaže, da imajo različno naravo, namen ali način uporabe itd.
The same reasoning does not apply if the different classification is only due to a revision of the Nice Classification or where it is clear that the goods/services are wrongly ‘classified' due to an obvious mistake.
Enaka obrazložitev se ne uporablja, če je različna razvrstitev le posledica revizije Nicejske klasifikacije ali če je jasno, da so blago ali storitve napačno „razvrščene“ zaradi očitne napake.
Playing cards (Class 16 - 7th edition) are identical to playing cards (Class 28 - 10th edition).
Igralne karte (razred 16 - sedma izdaja) so enake igralnim kartam (razred 28 - deseta izdaja).
Pharmaceutical preparations (Class 15) - an obvious typing error - are identical to pharmaceutical preparations (Class 5).
Farmacevtski pripravki (razred 15) - očitna tipkarska napaka - so enaki farmacevtskim pripravkom (razred 5).
2.3 Terms included in the general indication or broad category
Izrazi, vključeni v splošno označbo ali široko kategorijo
2.3.1 The earlier mark includes the goods/services of the contested mark
Prejšnja blagovna znamka vključuje blago ali storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke.
Where the list of goods/services of the earlier right includes a general indication or a broad category that covers the goods/services of the contested mark in their entirety, the goods/services will be identical (17/01/2012, T522/10, Hell, EU:T:2012:9, § 36).
Če seznam blaga ali storitev prejšnje pravice vključuje splošno označbo ali širšo kategorijo, ki v celoti zajema blago ali storitve izpodbijane blagovne znamke, so blago ali storitve enake (17/01/2012, T522/10, Hell, EU:T:2012:9, § 36).
Temporary accommodation (earlier right, Class 43) includes youth hostel services (contested mark, Class 43).
Začasna nastanitev (prejšnja pravica, razred 43) vključuje storitve mladinskih hotelov (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 43).
Therefore, the services are identical.
Zato sta storitvi enaki.
Pasta (earlier right, Class 30) includes spaghetti (contested mark, Class 30).
Testenine (prejšnja pravica, razred 30) vključuje špagete (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 30).
The conflicting goods are considered identical.
Nasprotujoče si blago se šteje za enako.
2.3.2 The contested mark includes the goods/services of the earlier mark
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje blago ali storitve prejšnje znamke.
If the goods/services designated in the earlier mark are covered by a general indication or broad category used in the contested mark, these goods/services must be considered identical since the Office cannot dissect ex officio the broad category of the applicant's/holder's goods/services (07/09/2006, T133/05, Pam-Pim's Baby-Prop, EU:T:2006:247, § 29).
Če so blago ali storitve, ki jih označuje prejšnja znamka, vključene v splošno označbo ali širšo kategorijo, uporabljeno v izpodbijani znamki, je treba to blago ali storitve šteti za enake, ker Urad po uradni dolžnosti ne sme razčleniti širše kategorije prijaviteljevega/imetnikovega blaga ali storitev (07/09/2006, T133/05, Pam-Pim's Baby-Prop, EU:T:2006:247, § 29).
The earlier mark's jeans (Class 25) are included in articles of clothing (contested mark, Class 25).
Denim kavbojke iz prejšnje blagovne znamke (razred 25) so vključene v oblačila (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 25).
The goods are considered identical.
Blago se šteje za enako.
The earlier mark's bicycles (Class 12) are included in vehicles (contested mark, Class 12).
Kolesa iz prejšnje blagovne znamke (razred 12) so vključena v vozila (izpodbijana blagovna znamka, razred 12).
The applicant/holder may, however, restrict the list of goods/services in a way that excludes identity, but could still lead to similarity (24/05/2011, T161/10, E-Plex, EU:T:2011:244, § 22).
Prijavitelj/imetnik lahko omeji seznam blaga ali storitev tako, da izključi enakost, vendar bi to lahko še vedno vodilo v podobnost (24/05/2011, T161/10, E-Plex, EU:T:2011:244, § 22).
The earlier mark's jeans (Class 25) are included in articles of clothing (Class 25).
Denim kavbojke iz prejšnje znamke (razred 25) so vključene v oblačila (razred 25).
The applicant/holder restricts the specification to articles of clothing, excluding jeans.
Prijavitelj/imetnik omeji specifikacijo na oblačila, razen denim kavbojk.
The goods are no longer identical but remain similar.
Blago ni več enako, je pa še vedno podobno.
The earlier mark's bicycles (Class 12) are included in vehicles (contested mark, Class 12).
Kolesa iz prejšnje znamke (razred 12) so vključena v vozila (izpodbijana znamka, razred 12).
The applicant/holder restricts the specification to vehicles, namely automobiles.
Prijavitelj/imetnik omeji specifikacijo na vozila, in sicer avtomobili.
The goods are no longer identical or similar.
Blago ni več enako ali podobno.
If the applicant/holder does not restrict the list of goods/services, or does not do so sufficiently, the Office will treat the contested mark's general indication or broad term/category as a single unit and find identity.
Če prijavitelj/imetnik ne omeji seznama blaga ali storitev oziroma ga ne omeji dovolj, bo Urad obravnaval splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo izpodbijane znamke kot eno enoto in ugotovil enakost.
If the contested mark covers a general indication or a broad term/category as well as specific items that fall under that general indication or broad term/category, all of these will need to be compared with the specific earlier goods/services.
Če izpodbijana znamka zajema splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo in specifično blago ali storitve, ki spadajo pod to splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo, je vse to treba primerjati s specifičnim prejšnjim blagom ali storitvami.
The result of identity found with the general indication or broad term/category does not automatically extend to the specific items.
Enakost, ugotovljena s splošno označbo ali širšim izrazom/kategorijo, se ne razširi samodejno na specifično blago ali storitve.
The contested mark covers vehicles (general indication) as well as bicycles, aircraft, trains (included in vehicles).
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje vozila (splošna označba) ter kolesa, zračna vozila, vlake (vključene v vozila).
Where the earlier mark is protected for bicycles, identity will be found with respect to vehicles and to bicycles but not for aircraft or trains.
Če je prejšnja znamka zaščitena za kolesa, se bo enakost ugotovila v zvezi z vozili in kolesi, ne pa za zračna vozila ali vlake.
However, if the contested mark covers a general indication or broad term/category and specific terms that are not listed independently but only as examples, the comparison differs insofar as only the general indication or broad term/category has to be compared.
Če pa izpodbijana znamka vključuje splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo in posebne izraze, ki niso navedeni samostojno, temveč samo kot primeri, se primerjava razlikuje, saj je treba primerjati samo splošno označbo ali širši izraz/kategorijo.
The contested mark covers vehicles, in particular bicycles, aircraft, trains.
Izpodbijana znamka vključuje vozila, zlasti kolesa, zračna vozila, vlake.
The earlier mark is protected for bicycles.
Prejšnja znamka je zaščitena za kolesa.
The goods in conflict are considered identical.
Nasprotujoče si blago se šteje za enako.
The applicant/holder can avoid this result by deleting the general indication vehicles, the expression in particular, and the specific category bicycles.
Prijavitelj/imetnik se lahko temu rezultatu izogne tako, da črta splošno označbo vozila, izraz zlasti in posebno kategorijo kolesa.
Where the list of goods and/or services of the contested mark reads: vehicles, namely bicycles, aircraft, trains, the comparison differs insofar as only the specific items have to be compared.
Če se seznam blaga in/ali storitev izpodbijane znamke glasi: vozila, in sicer kolesa, zračna vozila, vlaki, se primerjava razlikuje, saj je treba primerjati samo specifično blago ali storitve.
In this case only the contested bicycles are identical to the earlier goods.
V tem primeru so le izpodbijana kolesa enaka prejšnjemu blagu.
2.4 Overlap
Prekrivanje
If two categories of goods/services coincide partially (‘overlap') there might be identity if:
Če se dve kategoriji blaga ali storitev delno ujemata („prekrivata“), enakost lahko obstaja, če:
they are classified in the same class;
sta uvrščeni v isti razred;
it is impossible to clearly separate the two goods/services.
če ni mogoča jasna ločitev obeh vrst blaga ali storitev.
In such cases, it is impossible for the Office to filter these goods from the abovementioned categories.
Urad v takšnih primerih tega blaga ne more izključiti iz zgoraj navedenih kategorij.
Since the Office cannot dissect ex officio the broad category of the applicant's/holder's goods, they are considered to be identical.
Ker Urad po uradni dolžnosti ne more razčleniti širše kategorije prijaviteljevega/imetnikovega blaga, se to šteje za enako.
In the fifth example given above, the outcome changes, of course, if soap is limited to soaps for personal use.
V petem zgoraj navedenem primeru se izid seveda spremeni, če je milo omejeno na mila za osebno uporabo.
In this case the goods are no longer included in the heading cleaning preparations in Class 3 since the latter are only for household use.
Blago v tem primeru ni več vključeno v naslov čistilni pripravki za gospodinjske namene v razredu 3, ker so ti samo za uporabo v gospodinjstvu.
2.5 Practice on the use of general indications of the class headings
Praksa na področju uporabe splošnih označb naslovov razredov