natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Consumers might be misled and attribute a common origin to the goods/services concerned.
Potrošniki so lahko zavedeni in zadevnemu blagu/storitvam pripišejo skupni izvor.
The presence of a first name in one of the conflicting signs will not suffice to safely distinguish the signs in the minds of the consumers.
Prisotnost imena v enem od spornih znakov ne zadostuje za zanesljivo razlikovanje znakov v zaznavi potrošnikov.
The surname alone will be perceived as the short version of the full name, thus identifying the same origin.
Potrošniki bodo priimek zaznali kot krajšo različico celotnega imena in tako prepoznali skupni izvor.
7.3 Colour marks per se
Barvna znamka kot taka
When likelihood of confusion of two colour marks per se is assessed, a phonetic or conceptual comparison of the signs cannot be made and the visual similarities will depend on the colour of the signs.
Kadar se presoja verjetnost zmede dveh barvnih znamk kot takih, znakov ni mogoče zvočno ali pojmovno primerjati in bodo vizualne podobnosti odvisne od njune barve.
In the overall assessment, the Office takes into account the fact that there is a ‘public interest in not unduly restricting the availability of colours for other traders who market goods or services of the same type as those in respect of which registration is sought' (24/06/2004, C49/02 Blau/Gelb, EU:C:2004:384, § 41; 06/05/2003, C104/01, Libertel, EU:C:2003:244, § 52-56).
Urad mora pri celoviti presoji „upoštevati javni interes, in sicer da se drugim subjektom, ki ponujajo blago ali storitve enake vrste, kot je tisto, za katero se zahteva registracija, neupravičeno ne omeji razpoložljivosti barv“ (24/06/2004, C49/02 Blau/Gelb, EU:C:2004:384, § 41; 06/05/2003, C104/01, Libertel, EU:C:2003:244, § 52-56).
The inherent distinctiveness of colour marks per se is limited.
Svojstveni razlikovalni učinek barvnih znamk kot takih je omejen.
The scope of protection should be limited to identical or almost identical colour combinations.
Obseg varstva bi moral biti omejen na enake ali skoraj enake barvne kombinacije.
FISHBONE 29/09/2011 T415/09, EU:T:2011:550 (appeal 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, EU:C:2013:484, dismissed)
FISHBONE 29/09/2011 T415/09, EU:T:2011:550 (pritožba z dne 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, EU:C:2013:484, zavrnjena)
G&S: Classes 32, 33 Territory: Spain (where ‘venado' means ‘deer') Assessment: The Court found that the signs had the same concept and that there was significant visual similarity.
Blago in storitve: razreda 32 in 33 Ozemlje: Španija („venado“ pomeni „jelen“) Presoja: Sodišče je ugotovilo, da imajo znaki isti pojem in da so si vizualno zelo podobni.
In the absence of a clear semantic link between a deer or a deer's head and alcoholic or non‑alcoholic beverages, the Court found it impossible to deny that the concept of a deer's head portrayed facing forward inside a circle had at least average distinctive character for designating beverages (para. 110).
Ker ni jasne semantične povezave med jelenom ali jelenjo glavo ter alkoholnimi ali nealkoholnimi pijačami, Sodišče ni moglo zanikati, da ima pojem jelenje glave, ki je prikazana od spredaj in vrisana v krog, vsaj povprečen razlikovalni značaj za označevanje pijač (točka 110).
Enhanced distinctiveness was not considered - likelihood of confusion (for the Spanish public).
Povečan razlikovalni učinek se ni upošteval, kar pomeni verjetnost zmede (za špansko javnost).
G&S: Classes 18, 25, 28 Territory: Germany and the United Kingdom Assessment: Contrary to the Board's finding that there is no conceptual similarity, the term ‘sport', notwithstanding its descriptive character, refers to the same concept and leads to the conclusion that there is a degree of conceptual similarity.
Blago in storitve: razredi 18, 25 in 28 Ozemlje: Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo Presoja: V nasprotju z ugotovitvijo odbora, da ni pojmovne podobnosti, se beseda „sport“, ne glede na svoj razlikovalni učinek, nanaša na isti pojem in vodi v sklep, da gre za neko stopnjo pojmovne podobnosti.
The Court concluded that this similarity was weak in the context of the overall impression of the signs and in particular of the very weak distinctive character of this term.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je ta podobnost šibka v okviru splošnega vtisa znakov in zlasti zelo šibkega razlikovalnega značaja te besede.
However, the weak conceptual similarity did not offset the significant visual and phonetic differences between the signs (para. 49) - no likelihood of confusion.
Vendar šibka pojmovna podobnost ne odtehta velikih vizualnih in zvočnih razlik med znaki (točka 49) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
G&S: Class 2 Territory: Spain Assessment: Whilst ‘MUNDICOLOR' is to a certain extent evocative of ‘colours of the world' or ‘the world in colours' for the Spanish public, it cannot be regarded as having any clear and specific meaning.
Blago in storitve: razred 2 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Čeprav izraz „MUNDICOLOR“ špansko javnost delno spominja na „barve sveta“ ali „svet v barvah“, se ne more šteti za izraz z jasnim in določenim pomenom.
In the mark applied for, the same prefix is accompanied by the suffix ‘cor', a term which has no meaning in the Spanish language.
V prijavljeni znamki isto predpono spremlja pripona „cor“, ki v španščini nima pomena.
Therefore, notwithstanding the evocative nature of the prefix ‘mundi' (world), the latter is ultimately devoid of any concept for that public.
Zato ne glede na to, da predpona „mundi“ spominja na besedo svet, ta na koncu nima pomena za navedeno javnost.
As neither of the signs has a clear and specific meaning likely to be grasped immediately by the public, any conceptual difference between them is not such as to counteract their visual and aural similarities (paras 90-99) - likelihood of confusion.
Ker nobeden od znakov nima jasnega in določenega pomena, ki bi ga javnost lahko takoj dojela, pojmovna razlika med njimi ne bo prevladala nad vizualnimi in zvočnimi podobnostmi (točke 90-99) - verjetnost zmede.
‘XL' is an abbreviation of extra-large size used within the whole EU.
„XL“ je kratica za zelo veliko velikost in se uporablja po vsej EU.
For the goods in question, namely alcoholic beverages, the public is likely to associate it with an extra quantity of a drink (paras 34, 35).
V primeru zadevnega blaga, tj. alkoholnih pijač, javnost lahko to poveže z zelo veliko količino pijače (točki 34 in 35).
The word element TORO is distinctive (para. 42).
Besedni element TORO je razlikovalen (točka 42).
The marks are visually, and phonetically dissimilar (paras 46, 48) and there is only a weak conceptual similarity (para. 52).
Znamki se vizualno in zvočno razlikujeta (točki 46 in 48) in obstaja samo ena šibka pojmovna podobnost (točka 52).
The likelihood of confusion is excluded (para. 57)
Verjetnost zmede je izključena (točka 57).
G&S: Classes 9, 41, 42 in relation to games Territory: EU Assessment: The word ‘bingo' is descriptive of the corresponding game of chance, the English word ‘spin' alludes to a rotating object or to the action of spinning something (para. 36).
Blago in storitve: razredi 9, 41, 42 v zvezi z igrami Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Beseda „bingo“ je opisna in ustreza igri na srečo, angleška beseda „spin“ pa namiguje na vrteči se predmet ali dejanje vrtenja nečesa (točka 36).
The Court confirmed the Board's finding that there was a low degree of visual, aural and conceptual similarity between the signs at issue, despite the fact that they contain the expression ‘spin bingo'.
Sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitev Urada, da gre med zadevnimi znaki za šibko vizualno, zvočno in pojmovno podobnost, čeprav vsebujejo izraz „spin bingo“.
On a visual level, the degree of similarity is low because, regarding the earlier sign, the public would pay attention to the more distinctive element ‘zitro', which is devoid of any meaning in the relevant languages and is at the beginning of the sign.
Na vizualni ravni je podobnost šibka, saj bo v zvezi s prejšnjim znakom javnost pozornost namenila bolj razlikovalnemu elementu „zitro“, ki v upoštevnih jezikih nima pomena in je na začetku znaka.
Concerning the contested sign, consumers will pay as much attention to the different colour elements of the device which are the circles and the reel on which there is a representation of a smiling face.
Pri izpodbijanemu znaku bodo potrošniki enako pozornost namenili različnim barvnim elementom predmeta, ki ponazarjajo kroge in kolut, na katerem je prikazan smejoči se obraz.
On the aural level, the similarity was weak as well in the light of the descriptive meaning of the expression ‘spin bingo', and the fact that the public will pay attention to the more distinctive element ‘zitro'.
Na zvočni ravni je bila podobnost šibka tudi glede na opisni pomen izraza „spin bingo“ in dejstvo, da bo javnost pozornost namenila bolj razlikovalnemu elementu „zitro“.
On the conceptual level, the word ‘zitro' was dominant and was not conceptually similar to the contested sign (paras 11, 44).
Na pojmovni ravni je beseda „zitro“ prevladala in ni bila pojmovno podobna izpodbijanemu znaku (točki 11 in 44).
There is no likelihood of confusion.
Ni verjetnosti zmede.
CLUB GOURMET 28/07/2011, R1946/2010-1, confirmed 20/03/2013, T571/11, appealed, 06/02/2014, C301/13 P
CLUB GOURMET 28/07/2011, R1946/2010-1, potrjena 20/03/2013, T571/11, pritožba 06/02/2014, C301/13 P
G&S: Classes 16, 21, 29, 30, 32, 33 Territory: Spain Assessment: The conflicting signs only share the two words ‘CLUB' and ‘GOURMET'.
Blago in storitve: razredi 16, 21, 29, 30, 32 in 33 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Nasprotujočima si znakoma sta skupni samo dve besedi „CLUB“ in „GOURMET“.
However, they differ in all their other characteristics.
Razlikujeta pa se v vseh svojih drugih značilnostih.
First, the dominant and distinctive element of the earlier sign is not reproduced in the contested sign.
Prvič, izpodbijani znak ne reproducira prevladujočega in razlikovalnega elementa prejšnjega znaka.
Second, the verbal element ‘CLUB GOURMET' differs from the verbal element ‘CLUB DEL GOURMET': the earlier sign has fourteen letters (whilst the contested sign has eleven) and it is separated by the word ‘DEL' and followed by a comma.
Drugič, besedni element „CLUB GOURMET“ se razlikuje od besednega elementa „CLUB DEL GOURMET“: prejšnji znak je imel štirinajst črk (izpodbijani jih ima enajst) ter je razdeljen z besedo „DEL“ in na koncu ima vejico.
The common elements ‘CLUB' and ‘GOURMET' only have a weak distinctive character in relation to the goods and services at issue.
Skupna elementa „CLUB“ in „GOURMET“ imata samo šibek razlikovalni značaj v zvezi z zadevnim blagom in storitvami.
Indeed, there exists, for the relevant consumer, a strong conceptual link between the verbal element ‘CLUB DEL GOURMET' and the goods provided for by the opponent's services, which mainly consist of food and beverages.
Za upoštevnega potrošnika je prisotna močna pojmovna povezava med besednima elementoma „CLUB DEL GOURMET“ in blagom, ki ga zagotavlja vložnik ugovora in ki v glavnem zajema hrano in pijačo.
In the consumer's mind, ‘GOURMET' refers to the idea of a connoisseur or lover of good food or a person with a discerning palate, that is to say, someone who appreciates good food and drink.
Ob besedi „GOURMET“ bodo potrošniki pomislili na poznavalca ali ljubitelja dobre hrane ali osebo z izbranim okusom, tj. nekoga, ki ceni dobro hrano in pijačo.
Although it sounds and is of French origin, the meaning will be immediately grasped by the Spanish consumer (paras 39, 40).
Čeprav zveni in tudi je francoskega porekla, je španski potrošnik takoj dojel pomen besede (točki 39 in 40).
There is a [average] visual similarity and a high degree of phonetic and conceptual similarity (paras 36, 38, 40).
Obstajata [povprečna] vizualna podobnost in visoka stopnja zvočne in pojmovne podobnosti (točke 36, 38 in 40).
There is a likelihood of confusion for identical and similar goods, namely building materials, not of metal, parquet flooring of plastic and wood, flooring of wood, cork and laminate; subfloors; transportable floors, not of metal.
Obstaja verjetnost zmede v primeru enakega in podobnega blaga, tj. nekovinski gradbeni materiali, parketi iz plastike, parketne lesene talne obloge, parketna tla iz plute, večslojni parketi; slepi pod; nekovinska prenosna tla.
G&S: Class 7 Territory: EU Assessment: while the element ‘Perfect' has a laudatory character, the fact remains that none of the other elements in the signs can be considered to have a greater distinctive character or be dominant.
Blago in storitve: razred 7 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Element „Perfect“ ima poveličevalni značaj, a dejstvo je, da se nobeden od drugih elementov v znakih ne more šteti kot bolj razlikovalen ali prevladujoč.
The elements ‘aqua' and ‘water' also have a weak distinctive character owing to the fact that they will be perceived by the relevant public as meaning ‘water' and the goods covered all involve, in one way or another, water (para. 42).
Tudi elementa „aqua“ in „water“ imata šibek razlikovalni značaj, saj ju bo upoštevna javnost zaznavala v pomenu „vode“, vse zajeto blago pa na tak ali drugačen način vključuje vodo (točka 42).
Visually and phonetically, the similarity of the signs at issue is not limited to the presence of the term ‘perfect' within each of those two signs, since those signs also have the same length and the same number of syllables, that are identically stressed, and an almost identical sequence of vowels; based on an overall impression, the similar elements between the signs referred to prevail globally over the dissimilar elements (paras 28, 32) .
Vizualna in zvočna podobnost zadevnih znakov ni omejena na prisotnost izraza „perfect“ v vsakem od teh znakov, saj sta znaka tudi enako dolga in imata enako število zlogov, sta enako poudarjena in imata skoraj enako zaporedje samoglasnikov, na podlagi splošnega vtisa podobni elementi v znakih v celoti prevladajo nad različnimi elementi (točki 28 in 32).
The signs were found visually, phonetically and conceptually similar to an average degree (paras 32-33, 40).
Ugotovljeno je, da znaka dosegata povprečno stopnjo vizualne, zvočne in pojmovne podobnosti (točke 32-33 in 40).
G&S: Classes 35, 37, 39, 40, 42 Territory: EU Assessment: The Court confirmed that the lack of distinctive character of the term ‘AQUA' has to be taken into account and that the specialised relevant public will not pay much attention to the descriptive element ‘AQUA', the only common element of the conflicting signs (paras 84-85).
Blago in storitve: razredi 35, 37, 39, 40 in 42 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Sodišče je potrdilo, da je treba upoštevati pomanjkanje razlikovalnega značaja pojma „AQUA“ in da strokovna upoštevna javnost temu opisnemu elementu, ki je edini skupni element nasprotujočima si znakoma, ne bo namenjala veliko pozornosti (točki 84 in 85).
The figurative elements of the signs are totally different.
Figurativni elementi znakov so povsem različni.
They are basic but not insignificant, so they must be taken into account in the overall impression of the signs (paras 54-55).
So osnovni, vendar ne nepomembni, zato jih je treba upoštevati pri splošnem vtisu znakov (točki 54 in 55).
There is a low degree of visual similarity.
Vizualna podobnost je šibka.
There is a low degree of phonetic and conceptual similarity, even though the different suffixes allow the specialised public to gather a different conceptual content (paras 71-73).
Tudi zvočna in pojmovna podobnost sta šibki, tudi če različne pripone strokovni javnosti omogočajo, da dojame različno pojmovno vsebino (točke 71-73).
The differences between the signs are sufficient to exclude the likelihood of confusion, even for identical services and taking into account that the earlier trade mark, as a whole, has an enhanced distinctiveness (para. 86).
Razlike med znakoma so dovolj velike, da se izključi verjetnost zmede, tudi v primeru enakih storitev, ob upoštevanju, da ima prejšnja blagovna znamka kot celota povečan razlikovalni učinek (točka 86).
G&S: Classes 36, 38 Territory: Bulgaria Assessment: The Court confirmed that the signs at issue are visually and phonetically highly similar, and conceptually identical, given that they coincide in their word elements, and despite the figurative nature of the signs at issue, the fonts used for the word elements do not make it possible to detect any particular difference between them (para. 28 in fine).
Blago in storitve: razreda 36 in 38 Ozemlje: Bolgarija Presoja: Sodišče je potrdilo, da sta zadevna znaka vizualno in zvočno zelo podobna in pojmovno enaka, saj se ujemata v svojih besednih elementih; kljub figurativni naravi zadevnih znakov uporabljena pisava za besedne elemente ne omogoča, da bi se ugotovile kakršne koli posebne razlike med njimi (točka 28 na koncu).
G&S: Class 5 Territory: Austria Assessment: The Court found that although the element ‘BIO' is descriptive for the goods in question, the trade marks coincide not only in these three letters, but also in their fourth and fifth letters, ‘c' and ‘e' (para. 38).
Blago in storitve: razred 5 Ozemlje: Avstrija Presoja: Sodišče je ugotovilo, da se blagovni znamki kljub temu, da je element „BIO“ opisen za zadevno blago, ne ujemata samo v teh treh črkah, temveč tudi v četrti in peti črki „c“ in „e“ (točka 38).
The difference in the last letters, ‘rt' versus ‘f', does not counteract the important similarity arising from the fact that the first five letters at the centre of the two signs, which are of very similar length, are identical (para. 39).
Razlika med zadnjimi črkami „rt“ in „f“ ne prevlada nad pomembno podobnostjo, ki izhaja iz dejstva, da je prvih pet črk na sredini obeh znakov, ki so zelo podobne dolžine, enakih (točka 39).
There is an average degree of visual and phonetic similarity (paras 40, 46), whereas the conceptual comparison is neutral (para. 48)
Obstaja povprečna stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti (točki 40 in 46), pojmovna primerjava pa je nevtralna (točka 48).
MINI 23/01/2015, R 596/2014-4, confirmed 10/03/2016, T160/15, EU:T:2016:137
MINI 23/01/2015, R 596/2014-4, potrjeno 10/03/2016, T160/15, EU:T:2016:137
G&S: Class 12 Territory: United Kingdom Assessment: The earlier trade mark is reputed for cars, and accordingly, it has enhanced distinctive character in the UK.
Blago in storitve: razred 12 Ozemlje: Združeno kraljestvo Presoja: Prejšnja blagovna znamka ima ugled v zvezi z avtomobili, v skladu s tem pa povečan razlikovalni značaj v Združenem kraljestvu.
Thus, for the relevant public in the UK, the contested composite sign will be perceived as the widely-known trade mark ‘MINI' in combination with the descriptive word ‘CARGO'.
Zato bo upoštevna javnost v Združenem kraljestvu izpodbijani sestavljeni znak zaznavala kot splošno znano blagovno znamko „MINI“ v kombinaciji z opisno besedo „CARGO“.
This is as a direct consequence of the earlier trade mark's repute in the field of motor vehicles (paras 19, 25-26).
To je neposredna posledica ugleda prejšnje blagovne znamke na področju motornih vozil (točke 19, 25 in 26).
G&S: Class 25 Territory: Denmark, Finland, Sweden Assessment: ‘The element ‘by CAMPER' will be perceived as subsidiary, also due to the fact that the relevant public will perceive it as a mere indication of the undertaking producing the goods in question.'
Blago in storitve: razred 25 Ozemlje: Danska, Finska in Švedska Presoja: Element „by CAMPER“ bo zaznan kot podrejen element, med drugim tudi zato, ker ga bo upoštevna javnost zaznala le kot navedbo podjetja, ki proizvaja zadevno blago.
Therefore, relevant consumers will focus their attention on the word ‘BROTHERS' and might attribute a common origin to the goods concerned (paras 65, 86) - likelihood of confusion.
Zato bodo upoštevni potrošniki svojo pozornost osredotočili na besedo „BROTHERS“ in ji lahko pripisali skupni izvor zadevnega blaga (točki 65 in 86) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 18, 25 Territory: Portugal Assessment: The two word marks at issue are identical, which increases the likelihood that consumers might perceive the goods marketed under those marks as coming from the same source.
Blago in storitve: razreda 18 in 25 Ozemlje: Portugalska Presoja: Obe zadevni besedni znamki sta enaki, kar povečuje verjetnost, da bodo potrošniki blago, ki se trži pod tema znamkama, zaznavali, kot da izvira iz istega vira.
Moreover, the applicant has not shown that the Italian first name ‘Giordano' which makes up both trade marks is common in Portugal (para. 32) - likelihood of confusion.
Poleg tega prijavitelj ni dokazal, da je italijansko ime „Giordano“, ki sestavlja obe blagovni znamki, običajno na Portugalskem (točka 32) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Classes 9, 42 Territory: Portugal Assessment: The Court considers that even if it is not certain that the relevant public throughout the European Union will necessarily perceive the signs at issue as being specifically diminutives of the name ‘Elizabeth', the relevant public will certainly regard them as highly similar female names derived from the same root.
Blago in storitve: razreda 9 in 42 Ozemlje: Portugalska Presoja: Po mnenju Sodišča ni gotovo, da bo upoštevna javnost po Evropski uniji zadevna znaka nujno zaznala kot posebno pomanjševalnico imena „Elizabeth“, ju bo pa zagotovo štela za zelo podobni ženski imeni, ki izvirata iz istega korena.
In certain Member States, notably the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Austria, they will certainly be perceived by the relevant public as being diminutives of the full forename Elizabeth (para. 36) - likelihood of confusion.
V nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu, na Irskem, v Nemčiji in Avstriji, ju bo upoštevna javnost zagotovo zaznala kot pomanjševalnici imena Elizabeth (točka 36) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 25 Territory: EU Assessment: The marks compared are both variations of the female first name ‘Giselle' of old German and French origin and are overall very similar, so that a likelihood of confusion exists (paras 14, 15, 20) - likelihood of confusion.
Blago in storitve: razred 25 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Primerjani znamki sta različici ženskega imena „Giselle“, ki izvira iz stare nemščine in francoščine, in sta si v celoti zelo podobni, tako da obstaja verjetnost zmede (točke 14, 15 in 20) - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 3 Territory: Spain Assessment: In the Board's view, the average Spanish consumer who is familiar with the trade mark ‘LAURA' for perfumes will not be confused.
Blago in storitve: razred 3 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Odbor meni, da pri povprečnem španskem potrošniku, ki pozna blagovno znamko parfumov „LAURA“, ni verjetnost zmede.
Conceptually, ‘LAURA' will be seen as a common first name in Spain.
Konceptualno se „LAURA“ v Španiji zaznava kot običajno ime.
It is highly unlikely that the average Spanish consumer would consider linking the more specific name ‘LAURA MERCIER' with ‘LAURA' (para. 16) - no likelihood of confusion.
Malo je verjetno, da bi povprečen španski potrošnik povezoval bolj določno ime „LAURA MERCIER“ z imenom „LAURA“ (točka 16) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
G&S: Classes 29, 30 Territory: Spain Assessment: The term ‘SMITH' in the trade mark application will be perceived by the Spanish consumers as a common Anglo-Saxon surname and will have less weight than the first name ‘AMANDA' (which is less common in Spain) (para. 31) - likelihood of confusion.
Blago in storitve: razreda 29 in 30 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Izraz v prijavi blagovne znamke „SMITH“ bodo španski potrošniki zaznali kot običajni anglosaški priimek, ki bo imel manjši pomen kot ime „AMANDA“ (ki je v Španiji manj običajno) (točka 31) - verjetnost zmede.
ROSALIA ROSALIA DE CASTRO 05/10/2011, T421/10, EU:T:2011:565, (appeal 03/10/2012, C649/11 P, EU:C:2012:603, dismissed)
ROSALIA ROSALIA DE CASTRO 05/10/2011, T421/10, EU:T:2011:565 (pritožba 03/10/2012, C649/11 P, EU:C:2012:603, zavrnjena)
G&S: Classes 32, 33, 35 Territory: Spain Assessment: The signs are visually and conceptually similar, and aurally very similar.
Blago in storitve: razredi 32, 33 in 35 Ozemlje: Španija Presoja: Znaka sta vizualno in pojmovno podobna, zvočno pa zelo podobna.
The products are identical.
Izdelki so enaki.
The services are similar.
Storitve so podobne.
Neither the name ROSALIA nor the surname DE CASTRO is common in Spain.
V Španiji niti ime ROSALIA niti priimek DE CASTRO nista običajna.