natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, in the event that the opponent, after such a declaration, still submits physical evidence without formally revoking its previous declaration, and there is a contradiction between the online evidence and the physical evidence, the most recent up-to-date evidence will apply.
Poleg tega se, če vložnik ugovora po takšni izjavi še vedno predloži fizične dokaze, ne da bi formalno preklical svojo prejšnjo izjavo, in če so spletni in fizični dokazi v protislovju, uporabljajo najnovejši posodobljeni dokazi.
A declaration may be introduced by the opposing party at any time before expiry of the time limit of substantiation.
Stranka, ki ugovarja, lahko izjavo predloži kadar koli pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev.
In the absence of any formal declaration (including when such declaration has been withdrawn), the opposition should be rejected as non-substantiated if no physical evidence is presented in due time.
Če formalna izjava ni predložena (tudi v primeru umika takšne izjave), je treba ugovor zavrniti kot neutemeljen, če niso pravočasno predloženi fizični dokazi.
If the opponent has not proven the existence of at least one earlier right, the opposition will be refused as unfounded.
Če vložnik ugovora ni dokazal obstoja vsaj ene prejšnje pravice, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
If the earlier right that has been found admissible is not substantiated at the substantiation stage and there is/are another/other earlier right(s) that is/are substantiated, the absolute admissibility requirements for that/those earlier right(s) will be checked.
Če se prejšnja pravica, za katero je bilo ugotovljeno, da je dopustna, v fazi utemeljitve ne utemelji, obstaja pa druga prejšnja pravica ali več takih pravic, ki so utemeljene, je treba preveriti absolutne zahteve za dopustnost za to prejšnjo pravico ali več takih pravic.
In relation to the submission of supporting documents, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits.
V zvezi s predložitvijo dokazov glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
4.2.1 EUTMs and EUTM applications
Blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU
If the earlier mark or application is an EUTM, the opponent does not have to submit any documents as far as the existence and validity of the EUTM (application) is concerned.
Če je prejšnja znamka ali prijava blagovna znamka EU, vložniku ugovora ni treba predložiti dokumentov glede obstoja in veljavnosti (prijave) blagovne znamke EU.
The examination of the substantiation will be done ex officio with respect to the data contained in the Office's database.
Preizkus utemeljitve bo opravljen po uradni dolžnosti na podlagi podatkov iz podatkovne zbirke Urada.
4.2.2 Converted EUTMs and EUTM applications
Konvertirane blagovne znamke EU in prijave blagovnih znamk EU
Article 139(1) EUTMR
Člen 139(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
This section will deal only with specific aspects of conversion in opposition proceedings.
V tem razdelku bodo obravnavani le posebni vidiki konverzije v postopku ugovora.
For further information on conversion, see the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 2, Conversion.
Za več informacije o konverziji glej Smernice, del E: Registri, razdelek 2: Konverzija.
4.2.2.1 Opposition based on EUTM (application) (to be) converted
Ugovor, ki temelji na (prihodnji) konvertirani blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU)
National applications deriving from the conversion of an earlier EUTM or EUTM application are considered to come into existence as soon as a valid conversion request is submitted.
Za nacionalne prijave, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prejšnje blagovne znamke EU ali prijave blagovne znamke EU, se šteje, da obstajajo od trenutka, ko je predložena veljavna zahteva za konverzijo.
Such rights will be properly substantiated under Article 7(2) EUTMDR if the opponent indicates the number of the EUTM (or EUTM application) under conversion and the countries for which it has requested conversion.
Take pravice bodo ustrezno utemeljene na podlagi člena 7(2) Delegirane uredbe, če vložnik ugovora navede številko blagovne znamke EU (ali prijave blagovne znamke EU), ki je predmet konverzije, in države, za katere je zahteval konverzijo.
4.2.2.2 Opposition based on EUTM (application) that is subsequently converted
Ugovor, ki temelji na blagovni znamki EU (prijavi blagovne znamke EU), ki je pozneje konvertirana
When, during opposition proceedings, the EUTM application (or EUTM) on which the opposition is based ceases to exist (or the list of goods and services is restricted), and a request for conversion is submitted, the proceedings can continue.
Če prijava blagovne znamke EU (ali blagovna znamka EU), na kateri temelji ugovor, med postopkom ugovora preneha obstajati (ali je seznam blaga in storitev omejen) in je predložena zahteva za konverzijo, se lahko postopek nadaljuje.
This is because national trade mark registrations resulting from a conversion of an EUTM application can constitute the basis of the opposition procedure originally made on the basis of that EUTM application (15/07/2008, R 1313/2006G, CARDIVA (fig.) / CARDIMA (fig.)).
To pa zato, ker so lahko registracije nacionalne blagovne znamke, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prijave blagovne znamke EU, podlaga za postopek ugovora, ki je bil prvotno uveden na podlagi te prijave blagovne znamke EU (15/07/2008, R 1313/2006G, CARDIVA (fig.) / CARDIMA (fig.)).
In such a case the Office will request the opponent in writing to inform the Office whether it maintains the opposition in view of the withdrawal, surrender or rejection of the earlier EUTM application(s) or registration(s) and whether it intends to rely on the national applications that result from the conversion of the earlier EUTM.
V takem primeru bo Urad vložnika ugovora pozval, naj ga pisno obvesti, ali glede na umik, odpoved ali zavrnitev prijave (prijav) ali registracije (registracij) prejšnjih blagovnih znamk EU vztraja pri ugovoru in ali se namerava sklicevati na nacionalne prijave, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prejšnje blagovne znamke EU.
If the opponent does not inform the Office within the established time limit that it wishes to rely on the national applications, the opposition will be rejected as unfounded.
Če vložnik ugovora Urada v določenem roku ne obvesti, da se želi sklicevati na nacionalne prijave, bo ugovor zavrnjen kot neutemeljen.
Evidence of the existence of the earlier national applications must be submitted by the opponent as soon as it becomes available.
Vložnik ugovora mora dokaze o obstoju prejšnjih nacionalnih prijav predložiti takoj, ko so na voljo.
4.2.3 Trade mark registrations or applications that are not EUTMs
Registracije ali prijave blagovnih znamk, ki niso blagovne znamke EU
Article 7(2)(a)(i) and (ii) EUTMDR
Člen 7(2)(a)(i) in (ii) Delegirane uredbe
To substantiate an earlier trade mark application or registration the opponent must provide the Office with evidence of its filing or registration.
Vložnik ugovora mora za utemeljitev prejšnje prijave ali registracije blagovne znamke Uradu predložiti dokaze o vložitvi prijave ali registraciji.
The Office accepts as evidence of the filing or registration of earlier marks the following documents:
Urad kot dokaze o vložitvi prijave ali registraciji prejšnjih znamk sprejema naslednje dokumente:
certificates issued by the appropriate official body
potrdila, ki jih izda ustrezni uradni organ,
extracts from official databases
izpiske iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk,
extracts from official bulletins of the relevant national trade mark offices and WIPO.
izpiske iz uradnih biltenov ustreznih nacionalnih uradov za znamke in organizacije WIPO.
As mentioned above, the opponent may instead ask the Office to access the necessary information for this trade mark from the relevant online official database (see below under 4.2.3.2).
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, lahko vložnik ugovora namesto tega Urad zaprosi, naj potrebne informacije za to blagovno znamko poišče v ustrezni spletni uradni podatkovni zbirki (glej odstavek 4.2.3.2 v nadaljevanju).
4.2.3.1 Certificates issued by the appropriate official body
Potrdila, ki jih izda ustrezni uradni organ
Any registration certificate or the most recent renewal certificate showing the validity of the earlier mark beyond the time limit that was given to the opponent to substantiate its opposition, issued by a national office, or by WIPO if it concerns an international registration, constitutes valid evidence.
Vsako potrdilo o registraciji ali najnovejše potrdilo o podaljšanju, iz katerega je razvidna veljavnost prejšnje znamke po roku, ki je bil odobren vložniku ugovora za utemeljitev ugovora, in ga je izdal nacionalni urad ali organizacija WIPO, če se nanaša na mednarodno registracijo, je veljavni dokaz.
For further requirements relating to renewal certificates, see below.
Za dodatne zahteve v zvezi s potrdili o podaljšanju glej besedilo v nadaljevanju.
If the opposition is based on an application, the opponent must submit evidence that the application was filed at the national office or that an international application was filed with WIPO.
Če ugovor temelji na prijavi, mora vložnik ugovora predložiti dokaze, da je bila prijava vložena pri nacionalnem uradu ali da je bila mednarodna prijava vložena pri organizaciji WIPO.
Once the earlier application has proceeded to registration, the opponent must submit evidence of registration.
Ko je prejšnja prijava registrirana, mora vložnik ugovora predložiti dokaze o registraciji.
If, after the adversarial part of the proceedings, the opponent submits evidence that the national application in fact proceeded to registration before the time limit set in Article 7(1) EUTMDR, the earlier mark will be rejected as unfounded under Article 8(7) EUTMDR.
Če vložnik ugovora po kontradiktornem delu postopka predloži dokaze, da je bila nacionalna prijava dejansko registrirana pred rokom iz člena 7(1) Delegirane uredbe, bo prejšnja znamka zavrnjena kot neutemeljena na podlagi člena 8(7) Delegirane uredbe.
An application certificate is not sufficient to prove that the trade mark has been registered.
Potrdilo o prijavi ne zadostuje za dokaz, da je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
In other words, it cannot serve to prove the existence of a trade mark registration.
Z drugimi besedami, tega potrdila ni mogoče uporabiti za dokaz obstoja registracije blagovne znamke.
Certificates have to be checked carefully since, in some cases, there are only a few differences between an application form and the registration certificate.
Potrdila je treba skrbno preveriti, saj lahko v nekaterih primerih obstaja le malo razlik med obrazcem za prijavo in potrdilom o registraciji.
4.2.3.2 Extracts from official databases
Izpiski iz uradnih podatkovnih zbirk
Extracts from databases are accepted only if their origin is an official database, that is to say, the official database of one of the national offices or WIPO, and if they are equivalent to a certificate of registration or last renewal.
Izpiske iz podatkovnih zbirk je mogoče predložiti le, če izvirajo iz uradne podatkovne zbirke, tj. uradne podatkovne zbirke enega od nacionalnih uradov ali organizacije WIPO, ali če so enakovredni potrdilu o registraciji ali o zadnjem podaljšanju.
Where an extract is submitted, the unaltered electronic image of an online database extract reproduced on a separate sheet is also acceptable as long as it contains an official identification of the authority or database from which it originates.
Če je predložen izpisek, je sprejemljiva tudi nespremenjena elektronska slika izpiska iz spletne podatkovne zbirke na ločenem listu, če vsebuje uradno identifikacijo organa ali podatkovne zbirke, iz katere izvira.
Extracts from commercial databases are not accepted, even if they reproduce exactly the same information as the official extracts.
Izpiski iz komercialnih podatkovnih zbirk niso sprejemljivi, tudi če vsebujejo popolnoma enake informacije kot uradni izpiski.
Examples of extracts that are not accepted are DEMAS, MARQUESA, COMPUSERVE, THOMSON, OLIVIA, PATLINK, SAEGIS or COMPUMARK.
Med primeri nesprejemljivih izpiskov so DEMAS, MARQUESA, COMPUSERVE, THOMSON, OLIVIA, PATLINK, SAEGIS ali COMPUMARK.
For international registrations, the ROMARIN database is accepted (26/11/2014, T240/13, Alifoods, EU:T:2014:994) .
V zvezi z mednarodnimi registracijami je mogoče predložiti izpiske iz podatkovne zbirke ROMARIN (26/11/2014, T240/13, Alifoods, EU:T:2014:994).
The ‘short' version of the extract is sufficient as long as it contains all the necessary information, but the extended or long version of the WIPO extract is preferable as it contains all the individual indications for each designated country, including the Statement of Grant of Protection.
Zadostuje kratka različica izpiska, če vsebuje vse potrebne informacije, vendar je bolj zaželena razširjena ali dolga različica izpiska iz podatkovne zbirke organizacije WIPO, saj vsebuje vse posamezne označbe za vsako imenovano državo, vključno z izjavo o podelitvi varstva.
Extracts from TMview are acceptable evidence concerning international registrations and trade marks applied for or registered with the participating offices, as long as it contains the relevant data, since it reflects the information obtained directly from the databases of WIPO and the national offices.
Izpiski iz podatkovne zbirke TMview so sprejemljivi dokazi za mednarodne registracije in blagovne znamke, prijavljene ali registrirane pri sodelujočih uradih, če vključujejo vse ustrezne podatke, saj so v zadevni podatkovni zbirki upoštevane informacije, pridobljene neposredno iz podatkovnih zbirk organizacije WIPO in nacionalnih uradov.
If relying on online evidence, the opponent has to provide a direct link to the source or clearly identify the database.
Če se vložnik ugovora opira na spletne dokaze, mora predložiti neposredno povezavo na vir ali jasno opredeliti podatkovno zbirko.
The Office accepts official extracts from WIPO's ROMARIN or ‘Madrid Monitor' databases and from all the national IP offices' databases, while TMview is acceptable as a portal through which WIPO and the national offices are ‘accessed'.
Urad sprejema uradne izpiske iz podatkovnih zbirk organizacije WIPO ROMARIN ali Madrid Monitor in iz vseh podatkovnih zbirk nacionalnih uradov za intelektualno lastnino, pri čemer je podatkovna zbirka TMview sprejemljiva kot portal, prek katerega se dostopa do organizacije WIPO in nacionalnih uradov.
General references to such databases and sources are sufficient, with use of a direct hyperlink being optional.
Zadostujejo splošna sklicevanja na takšne podatkovne zbirke in vire, uporaba neposredne hiperpovezave pa ni obvezna.
For example, where the opponent relies on an earlier Spanish trade mark, the Office will accept indications such as ‘the Spanish national intellectual property office', ‘OEPM', ‘Spanish CEO database', ‘www.oepm.es' or ‘the administration with which the mark was registered', etc.
Če se vložnik ugovora na primer opira na prejšnjo špansko blagovno znamko, bo Urad sprejel navedbe, kot so španski nacionalni urad za intelektualno lastnino, OEPM, španska podatkovna zbirka CEO, www.oepm.es ali organ, pri katerem je bila blagovna znamka registrirana, itd.
When the extract from an official database or the database accessed online does not contain all the required information, the opponent must supplement it with other documents from an official source showing the missing information.
Če izpisek iz uradne podatkovne zbirke ali spletno dostopne podatkovne zbirke ne vsebuje vseh potrebnih informacij, ga mora vložnik ugovora dopolniti z drugimi dokumenti iz uradnega vira, ki vsebujejo manjkajoče informacije.
For figurative marks, database extracts sometimes show the image on a separate page.
Kar zadeva figurativne znamke, je v izpiskih iz podatkovne zbirke včasih slika prikazana na ločeni strani.
Consequently, as regards figurative trade marks, when opponents file an extract as evidence, they must ensure that the representation of the mark appears on the same page and, if not, an additional document/page showing the image must be filed.
Zato morajo vložniki ugovorov v zvezi s figurativnimi znamkami, kadar kot dokaz predložijo izpisek iz podatkovne zbirke, zagotoviti, da se prikaz znamke pojavi na isti strani, saj morajo v nasprotnem primeru predložiti dodaten dokument ali stran, na kateri je prikazana slika.
This can be from the database itself (which reproduces the image on a separate page that, when printed or saved as PDF, for example, includes an identification of the source) or from another official source (such as its publication in the official bulletin).
Ta je lahko iz podatkovne zbirke (ki sliko prikaže na ločeni strani, ki pri tiskanju ali shranjevanju v format PDF vključuje opredelitev vira) ali iz drugega uradnega vira (kot je njena objava v uradnem biltenu).
Copying the image from the database and including it electronically or otherwise in the notice of opposition form is not sufficient.
Ne zadostuje, če se slika kopira iz podatkovne zbirke in elektronsko ali kako drugače vključi v obrazec za ugovor.
When English is the language of the proceedings, and where the national office also provides an English version of the trade mark extract no translation would in principle, be necessary.
Če je jezik postopka angleščina in nacionalni urad predloži tudi angleško različico izpiska v zvezi z blagovno znamko, prevod načeloma ni potreben.
However, as regards the list of goods and/or services, where the extract itself only gives the class headings along with a warning indicating that this reference to the class heading does not necessarily reflect the goods and/or services protected under the trade mark, the opponent must always file the original list in the original language (from an official source) and, where the list does not consist of a class heading, an accurate translation into English.
Če pa so, kar zadeva seznam blaga in/ali storitev, na izpisku navedeni samo naslovi razredov skupaj z opozorilom, da to sklicevanje na naslov razreda ne izraža nujno blaga in/ali storitev, zaščitenih z blagovno znamko, mora v takšnem primeru vložnik ugovora vedno predložiti izvirni seznam v izvirnem jeziku (iz uradnega vira) in, kadar seznam ne zajema naslova razreda, natančen prevod v angleščino.
Such translations are also required if the opponent relies on evidence accessible online from a source recognised by the Office if such evidence or part of it is not in the language of the proceedings.
Takšni prevodi se zahtevajo tudi, če se vložnik ugovora opira na dokaze, dostopne prek spletnega vira, ki ga priznava Urad, če takšni dokazi ali del dokazov ni v jeziku postopka.
4.2.3.3 Extracts from official bulletins of the relevant national trade mark offices and WIPO
Izpiski iz uradnih biltenov zadevnih nacionalnih uradov za znamke in organizacije WIPO
In all Member States the trade mark application and/or registration is published in an official bulletin.
Prijava za znamko in/ali registracija znamke je v vseh državah članicah objavljena v uradnem biltenu.
Copies of the publication are accepted as long as the document (or the accompanying observations of the opponent) indicates the origin of the publication.
Kopije objave so sprejemljive, če je na dokumentu (ali priloženih pripombah vložnika ugovora) naveden vir objave.
If this indication is missing, the evidence is insufficient to prove the validity of the mark.
Če ta navedba manjka, takšni dokumenti ne zadostujejo za dokaz veljavnosti znamke.
Furthermore, a copy of the publication of the application is not sufficient to prove that the trade mark has been registered.
Poleg tega kopija objave prijave ne zadostuje za dokaz, da je bila blagovna znamka registrirana.
In other words, it cannot serve to prove the existence of a trade mark registration.
Z drugimi besedami, te kopije ni mogoče uporabiti za dokaz obstoja registracije blagovne znamke.
The Office accepts the first WIPO publication of the international registration as sufficient evidence of registration although, once registered, it can still be refused by national offices during the following 12 to 18 months.
Urad prvo objavo mednarodne registracije pri organizaciji WIPO priznava kot zadostni dokaz o registraciji, čeprav jo lahko nacionalni organi po registraciji v naslednjih 12 do 18 mesecih še vedno zavrnejo.
Only if the applicant contests the protection of the mark in question in a given territory or for certain goods and services will the opponent have to submit evidence that the mark was not refused.
Vložnik ugovora bo moral dokaze, da znamka ni bila zavrnjena, predložiti le, če prijavitelj izpodbija varstvo zadevne znamke na ustreznem ozemlju ali za nekatero blago in storitve.
4.2.3.4 Duration of a trade mark registration
Veljavnost registracije blagovne znamke
In general, the registration of a mark lasts 10 years.
Na splošno registracija znamke velja deset let.
After this period has elapsed, the registration of the mark can be renewed every 10 years.
Po izteku tega obdobja se lahko registracija znamke podaljša vsakih deset let.
In most of the countries, the starting point of the 10 years is the filing date, but there are exceptions.
V večini držav začne desetletno obdobje teči z datumom vložitve, vendar so možne tudi izjeme.
According to Article 7(2)(a)(ii) EUTMDR, if the trade mark is registered, the opponent must submit evidence of registration.
V skladu s členom 7(2)(a)(ii) Delegirane uredbe mora vložnik ugovora, če je blagovna znamka registrirana, predložiti dokaz o registraciji.
If the opponent has submitted a registration certificate but the registration is due to expire before the expiry of the time limit for substantiation, it must file a renewal certificate or equivalent document in order to prove that the term of protection of the trade mark extends beyond this time limit or any extension given to substantiate its opposition.
Če je vložnik ugovora predložil potrdilo o registraciji, vendar bo registracija potekla pred iztekom roka za utemeljitev, mora predložiti potrdilo o podaljšanju ali enakovreden dokument, da bi dokazal, da obdobje varstva blagovne znamke sega čez ta rok ali podaljšanje roka, ki mu je odobren za utemeljitev ugovora.
Such information must be accessible from a source recognised by the Office if the opponent relied on it.
Takšne informacije morajo biti dostopne iz vira, ki ga Urad priznava, če se je vložnik ugovora skliceval nanj.
What counts is the date on which the registration would expire, and not the possibility of renewing the mark within the 6-month grace period under the Paris Convention.
Pomemben je datum poteka registracije, ne pa možnost podaljšanja znamke v šestmesečnem odložnem roku (grace period) v smislu Pariške konvencije.
When an earlier right on which the opposition is based reaches the end of protection after expiry of the time limit set by the Office to substantiate the opposition, the opposition is not automatically rejected in the absence of further communications or proof from the opponent.
Kadar se varstvo prejšnje pravice, na kateri temelji ugovor, preneha po izteku roka, ki ga določi Urad za utemeljitev ugovora, se ugovor ne zavrne samodejno, če vložnik ugovora ne predloži nadaljnjih sporočil ali dokazov.
Rather a communication is issued to the opponent in which it is invited to submit evidence of renewal, which is then communicated to the applicant (05/05/2015, T715/13, Castello (fig.) / Castelló y Juan S.A. (fig.) et al., EU:T:2015:256, § 68 et seq.).
Namesto tega se mu pošlje sporočilo, v katerem se ga pozove k predložitvi dokazov o podaljšanju, ki se nato predložijo prosilcu (05/05/2015, T715/13, Castello (fig.) / Castelló y Juan S.A. (fig.) et al., EU:T:2015:256, § 68 et seq.).
Only if the renewal certificate contains all the necessary data that determines the scope of the protection of the earlier mark, can the renewal certificate be submitted without a copy of the registration certificate.
Samo če potrdilo o podaljšanju vsebuje vse potrebne podatke za določitev obsega varstva prejšnje znamke, je mogoče potrdilo o podaljšanju predložiti brez kopije potrdila o registraciji.