natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the language chosen by the opponent is a language of the Office, but not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, the opposing party must produce, at its own expense, a translation of the notice of opposition into the first language, providing it is a language of the Office, or into the second language.
Če je jezik, ki ga je izbral vložnik ugovora, jezik Urada, vendar ne eden od možnih jezikov postopka, mora stranka, ki ugovarja, na lastne stroške priskrbeti prevod ugovora v prvi jezik, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugi jezik.
The translation must be produced within 1 month from the expiry of the 3-month opposition period.
Prevod je treba predložiti v enem mesecu od izteka trimesečnega roka za ugovor.
The language into which the notice of opposition has been translated will then become the language of the proceedings.
Jezik, v katerega je preveden ugovor, nato postane jezik postopka.
Where the opposing party does not submit the translation within this time limit, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible.
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, prevoda ne predloži v tem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Article 146(7) EUTMR and Article 5(3) and (4) EUTMDR apply.
Uporabljata se člen 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ter člen 5(3) in (4) Delegirane uredbe.
If the language chosen by the opponent is not a language of the Office, the opposing party must produce, at its own expense, a translation of the notice of opposition into the first language, providing it is a language of the Office, or into the second language.
Če jezik, ki ga je izbral vložnik ugovora, ni jezik Urada, mora stranka, ki ugovarja, na lastne stroške priskrbeti prevod ugovora v prvi jezik, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugi jezik.
The translation must be produced within the 3-month opposition period.
Prevod je treba predložiti v trimesečnem roku za ugovor.
Where the opposing party does not submit the translation within the opposition period, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible.
Če stranka, ki ugovarja, prevoda ne predloži v roku za ugovor, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Article 146(5) EUTMR applies as it clearly specifies that the notice of opposition must be filed in a language of the Office.
Uporablja se člen 146(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, saj je v njem jasno določeno, da je treba ugovor vložiti v jeziku Urada.
If it is not filed in a language of the Office, the 1-month period to remedy the deficiency of Article 146(7) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR does not apply.
Če ugovor ni vložen v jeziku Urada, se enomesečni rok za odpravo pomanjkljivosti iz člena 146(7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člena 5(3) Delegirane uredbe ne uporablja.
In the event that the language chosen by the opponent is not one of the possible languages of the proceedings, any correspondence issued by the Office in the opposition will be in the first language of the contested mark, providing it is a language of the Office, or in the second language if the first one is not one of the five languages of the Office.
Če jezik, ki ga izbere vložnik ugovora, ni eden od možnih jezikov postopka, bodo vsi dopisi, ki jih izda Urad v postopku ugovora, v prvem jeziku izpodbijane znamke, če je ta jezik Urada, ali v drugem jeziku, če prvi jezik ni eden od petih jezikov Urada.
The language requirement of the notice of opposition is an absolute admissibility requirement and will be dealt with as explained under paragraph 2.4.1 below.
Jezikovna zahteva o ugovoru je absolutna zahteva za dopustnost, ki bo obravnavana, kot je pojasnjeno v odstavku 2.4.1 v nadaljevanju.
Concerning the use of official forms, the second sentence of Article 146(6) EUTMR states that when the form provided by the Office is used, it may be used in any official language of the European Union, provided that it is completed in one of the languages of the Office as far as textual elements are concerned.
Kar zadeva uporabo uradnih obrazcev, je v drugem stavku člena 146(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določeno, da se v primeru uporabe obrazca Urada lahko obrazec uporabi v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije, če je, kar zadeva besedilne elemente, izpolnjen v enem od jezikov Urada.
Where the opponent uses the official form in a language that cannot be the language of the proceedings, all textual elements are in the wrong language and a language has been chosen that cannot be the language of the proceedings, the above principles apply: where the incorrect language chosen is a language of the Office, the opponent has 1 month to file a translation on its own motion; where the incorrect language chosen is not a language of the Office, the deficiency cannot be remedied after the expiry of the opposition period and the opposition will be deemed inadmissible.
Če vložnik ugovora uporablja uradni obrazec v jeziku, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, so vsi besedilni elementi v napačnem jeziku in je bil izbran jezik, ki ne more biti jezik postopka, se uporabljajo zgornja načela: če je izbrani napačni jezik jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu predložiti prevod na svojo pobudo, če pa izbrani napačni jezik ni jezik Urada, pomanjkljivosti ni mogoče odpraviti po izteku roka za ugovor in ugovor se bo štel za nedopustnega.
2.3.2 Examples
Primeri
As an illustration of what is explained in paragraph 2.3.1 above, here are some examples.
V nadaljevanju so navedeni nekateri primeri, v katerih je ponazorjeno, kar je pojasnjeno v odstavku 2.3.1 zgoraj.
a) The languages of the EUTM application are PT and EN.
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta portugalščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in PT, choosing PT as the language of the proceedings.
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v portugalščini, pri čemer portugalščino izbere za jezik postopka.
As the language of the proceedings has not been correctly chosen, since PT is not a language of the Office, the opponent must submit the translation of the notice of opposition into EN (the only correct language) before the expiry of the opposition period, and EN will therefore become the language of the proceedings.
Ker jezik postopka ni bil izbran pravilno, saj portugalščina ni jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora pred iztekom roka za ugovor predložiti prevod ugovora v angleščini (edini ustrezen jezik), zato bo angleščina postala jezik postopka.
b) The languages of the EUTM application are BG and EN.
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta bolgarščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in BG, and in BG expressly indicates that the language of the proceedings is EN.
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v bolgarščini, pri čemer v bolgarščini izrecno navede, da je jezik postopka angleščina.
The Office cannot accept an indication in BG that the language should be EN.
Urad ne more sprejeti navedbe v bolgarščini, da mora biti jezik postopka angleščina.
As the language of the proceedings has not been correctly indicated, since BG is not a language of the Office, the opponent must submit the translation of the notice of opposition into EN (the only correct language) before the expiry of the opposition period, and EN will therefore become the language of the proceedings.
Ker jezik postopka ni bil naveden pravilno, saj bolgarščina ni jezik Urada, mora vložnik ugovora pred iztekom roka za ugovor predložiti prevod ugovora v angleščini (edini ustrezen jezik), zato bo angleščina postala jezik postopka.
c) The languages of the EUTM application are DE and EN.
Jezika prijave blagovne znamke EU sta nemščina in angleščina.
The opponent files an opposition in FR.
Vložnik ugovora vloži ugovor v francoščini.
As FR is a language of the Office and as the language of proceedings can be either DE or EN, the opponent must produce the translation within 1 month of expiry of the opposition period into DE or EN, which will become the language of the proceedings.
Ker je francoščina jezik Urada in ker je lahko jezik postopka nemščina ali angleščina, mora vložnik ugovora v enem mesecu po izteku roka za ugovor predložiti prevod v nemščini ali angleščini, ki bo postala jezik postopka.
In all of the above examples, if the opponent does not submit the translation into a correct language within the relevant time limit, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible.
Če v vseh zgornjih primerih vložnik ugovora prevoda v ustrezni jezik ne predloži v zadevnem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
However, in the above examples, if the official form had been used in PT, BG and FR respectively, but had been completed in its entirety in EN expressly indicating EN as the language of the proceedings, this would be admissible without any need for a translation into EN to be submitted.
Če pa bi bil v zgornjih primerih uporabljen uradni obrazec v portugalščini, bolgarščini oziroma francoščini, vendar bi bil v celoti izpolnjen v angleščini ob izrecni navedbi, da je angleščina jezik postopka, bi bilo to sprejemljivo in ne bi bilo treba predložiti prevoda v angleščini.
There would be no need to submit a translation of the official form if all the textual elements, and the indication of language, were in EN.
Prevoda uradnega obrazca ne bi bilo treba predložiti, če bi bili vsi besedilni elementi in navedba jezika v angleščini.
2.4 Admissibility check
Preizkus dopustnosti
Articles 2(2) and 5(3) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2) ter člen 5(3) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
The admissibility check covers both absolute and relative requirements:
Preizkus dopustnosti obsega absolutne in relativne zahteve:
absolute requirements are the indications and elements that must be present in the notice of opposition or submitted by the opponent on its own initiative within the opposition period, as laid down in Article 2(2)(a) to (c) EUTMDR, and Article 146(5) and (7) EUTMR;
absolutne zahteve so navedbe in elementi, ki jih mora vsebovati ugovor ali ki jih na lastno pobudo v roku za ugovor predloži vložnik ugovora, kot je določeno v členu 2(2)(a) do (c) Delegirane uredbe ter členu 146(5) in (7) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU,
relative requirements are the indications and elements that, if they are not submitted within the opposition period, trigger a deficiency notice from the Office, allowing the opponent to remedy the deficiency within a non-extendable time limit of 2 months, as laid down in Article 2(2)(d) to (h) EUTMDR.
relativne zahteve so navedbe in elementi, katerih nepredložitev v roku za ugovor pomeni, da bo Urad poslal obvestilo o pomanjkljivostih, na podlagi katerega ima vložnik ugovora za odpravo pomanjkljivosti na voljo dva meseca, ki ju ni mogoče podaljšati, kot je določeno v členu 2(2)(d) do (h) Delegirane uredbe.
In addition, there are optional indications laid down in Article 2(2)(i) and (4) EUTMDR, that do not lead to a finding of non-admissibility, namely the submission of a reasoned statement or an indication of the goods and services against which the opposition is directed.
Poleg tega so v členu 2(2)(i) in (4) Delegirane uredbe neobvezne navedbe, ki ne privedejo do ugotovitve nedopustnosti, in sicer utemeljena izjava ali navedba o blagu ali storitvah, ki jih ugovor zadeva.
For the purposes of assessing the admissibility of the opposition the Office must base itself solely on the claims contained in the documents submitted by the opponent within the opposition period (21/07/2014, R 1573/20134, OKAY / O-KEY (fig.)).
Urad mora pri presoji dopustnosti ugovora upoštevati le trditve iz dokumentov, ki jih vložnik ugovora predloži v roku za ugovor (21/07/2014, R 1573/20134, OKAY / O-KEY (fig.)).
Identification elements are to be looked for not only in the notice of opposition, but also in annexes or other documents filed together with the opposition or any documents submitted within the opposition period.
Elemente za opredelitev je treba poiskati v ugovoru in prilogah ali drugih dokumentih, predloženih skupaj z ugovorom, ali katerih kolih drugih dokumentih, predloženih v roku za ugovor.
Extent of the admissibility check
Obseg preizkusa dopustnosti
The earlier marks/rights are examined to see if at least one is clearly identified.
Proučijo se prejšnje znamke/pravice, da se ugotovi, ali je vsaj ena od njih jasno opredeljena.
If the only earlier right on which the opposition is based is not duly identified, the opposition is inadmissible and the opponent is invited to comment on the inadmissibility before the decision on inadmissibility is taken.
Če edina prejšnja pravica, na kateri temelji ugovor, ni ustrezno opredeljena, je ugovor nedopusten, vložnik ugovora pa je pozvan k predložitvi pripomb glede nedopustnosti, preden se sprejme odločba o nedopustnosti.
If the only earlier right on which the opposition is based is duly identified (absolute requirements), the Office will examine whether it also meets the relative admissibility requirements.
Če je edina prejšnja pravica, na kateri temelji ugovor, ustrezno opredeljena (absolutne zahteve), bo Urad proučil, ali ugovor izpolnjuje tudi relativne zahteve za dopustnost.
If the opposition is based on more than one earlier right and at least one of them has been correctly identified, the examination of admissibility (relative requirements) can proceed based on that earlier right.
Če ugovor temelji na več kot eni prejšnji pravici in je bila vsaj ena od njih ustrezno opredeljena, se lahko preizkus dopustnosti (relativne zahteve) nadaljuje na podlagi te prejšnje pravice.
The parties are informed thereof when notification of the time limits for the opposition proceedings is sent to the parties.
Stranki sta o tem obveščeni, ko jima je poslano uradno obvestilo o rokih postopka ugovora.
If necessary, the admissibility issue will be dealt with in the decision on the opposition.
Vprašanje dopustnosti se po potrebi obravnava v odločbi o ugovoru.
2.4.1 Absolute admissibility requirements
Absolutne zahteve za dopustnost
Absolute admissibility deficiencies can only be remedied on the opponent's initiative during the 3-month opposition period; otherwise the opposition is inadmissible.
Absolutne pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z dopustnostjo je mogoče odpraviti le na pobudo vložnika ugovora v trimesečnem roku za ugovor, sicer je ugovor nedopusten.
2.4.1.1 Identification of the contested EUTM application
Opredelitev izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU
Article 2(2)(a) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(a) in člen 5(3) Delegirane uredbe
The mandatory elements for identifying the contested EUTM application are the application number and the name of the applicant.
Obvezna elementa za opredelitev izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU sta številka prijave in ime prijavitelja.
If, for example, the application number indicated does not correspond to the name of the applicant indicated, the Office will decide if it can be established without any doubt which is the contested EUTM application.
Če se na primer navedena številka prijave ne ujema z navedenim imenom prijavitelja, bo Urad odločil, ali je mogoče brez kakršnega koli dvoma ugotoviti, katera je izpodbijana prijava blagovne znamke EU.
If the applicant's name is not indicated, it can be found in the Office's IT system.
Če ime prijavitelja ni navedeno, ga je mogoče poiskati v informacijskem sistemu Urada.
The date of publication is an optional indication that helps to double-check the identification of the EUTM application.
Datum objave je neobvezna navedba in omogoča dvojno preverjanje opredelitve prijave blagovne znamke EU.
Even if it is missing, the EUTM application can be sufficiently identified through the other indications.
Tudi če ta manjka, lahko za opredelitev prijave blagovne znamke EU zadostujejo druge navedbe.
Only one EUTM application can be contested in one notice of opposition.
V enem ugovoru je mogoče izpodbijati samo eno prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
2.4.1.2 Identification of earlier marks or rights
Opredelitev prejšnjih znamk ali pravic
Article 8(2) EUTMR
Člen 8(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 2(2)(b) and Article 5(3) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(b) in člen 5(3) Delegirane uredbe
Invoked rights that are not earlier
Uveljavljane pravice, ki niso prejšnje
Articles 8(2) and 46(1) EUTMR
Člen 8(2) in člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Sometimes an opposition is based on one or more marks or other rights that are not earlier than the EUTM application.
Včasih ugovor temelji na eni ali več znamkah ali drugih pravicah, ki niso prejšnje glede na prijavo blagovne znamke EU.
Whether at least one of the rights invoked is earlier is established at the admissibility stage.
Ali je vsaj ena od pravic, ki se uveljavlja, prejšnja, se opredeli v fazi preizkusa dopustnosti.
For an invoked right to be earlier it must have, in the absence of any priority, an application date that is prior to the day on which the contested EUTM application was filed.
Da bi bila pravica, ki se uveljavlja, prejšnja, mora biti datum njene prijave - brez katere koli prednostne pravice - pred datumom, ko je bila vložena izpodbijana prijava blagovne znamke EU.
In the case of conflict between a national mark and an EUTM application, the hour and the minute of filing of the national mark is not relevant for determining which mark is earlier (22/03/2012, C190/10, Rizo, EU:C:2012:157).
V primeru navzkrižja med nacionalno znamko in prijavo blagovne znamke EU, ura in minuta vložitve nacionalne znamke nista pomembni za določitev, katera znamka je prejšnja (22/03/2012, C190/10, Rizo, EU:C:2012:157).
If priority has been claimed, it should be determined to the extent that the relevant goods and services are earlier.
Če je bila vložena zahteva za priznanje prednostne pravice, jo je treba opredeliti, če so zadevno blago in storitve prejšnji.
For further information see also the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 2, Formalities.
Za več informacij glej tudi Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 2: Formalnosti.
When the only invoked mark is not earlier, or when all the marks invoked are not earlier, the Office will inform the opponent of the inadmissibility and invite it to comment on that issue before a decision on inadmissibility is taken.
Kadar edina znamka, ki se uveljavlja, ali vse znamke, ki se uveljavljajo, niso prejšnje, bo Urad pred sprejetjem odločbe o nedopustnosti vložnika ugovora obvestil o nedopustnosti in ga pozval k predložitvi pripomb glede nedopustnosti.
Where the opposition is based on more than one right, one being earlier and one or more not earlier, the Office will notify the admissibility of the opposition on the basis of the earlier one.
Če ugovor temelji na več kot eni pravici, pri čemer je ena prejšnja, ena ali več pa ne, bo Urad dopustnost ugovora sporočil na podlagi prejšnje pravice.
Earlier trade mark registrations or applications under Article 8(2)(a) and (b) EUTMR
Prejšnje registracije ali prijave blagovnih znamk v skladu s členom 8(2)(a) in (b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 8(2)(a) and (b) and Article 39(3) EUTMR
Člen 8(2)(a) in (b) ter člen 39(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 2(2)(b), 5(3) and 7(1), (4) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(b), člen 5(3) ter člen 7(1), (4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
These rights are European Union trade mark registrations or applications, international registrations designating the European Union, national or Benelux trade mark registrations or applications (including ‘ex-European Union trade marks' for which a request for conversion has been filed) and international registrations under the Madrid Agreement or Protocol having effect in a Member State.
Te pravice so registracije ali prijave blagovnih znamk Evropske unije, mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana Evropska unija, registracije ali prijave nacionalnih blagovnih znamk ali blagovnih znamk Beneluksa (vključno z nekdanjimi blagovnimi znamkami Evropske unije, za katere je bila vložena zahteva za konverzijo) in mednarodne registracije na podlagi Madridskega sporazuma ali protokola, ki velja v državi članici.
The absolute identification elements for earlier trade mark registrations and applications are listed here.
Absolutni elementi za opredelitev prejšnjih registracij in prijav blagovnih znamk so, kot sledi:
The registration/application number.
Številka registracije/prijave.
National applications deriving from the conversion of an earlier EUTM (application) are considered to come into existence as soon as a valid conversion request is submitted.
Za nacionalne prijave, ki izhajajo iz konverzije prejšnje (prijave) blagovne znamke EU, se šteje, da začnejo obstajati takoj po vložitvi veljavne zahteve za konverzijo.
Such rights will be properly identified for admissibility purposes if the opponent indicates the number of the EUTM (application) under conversion and the countries for which it has requested the conversion.
Takšne pravice bodo ustrezno opredeljene zaradi dopustnosti, če vložnik ugovora navede številko (prijave) blagovne znamke EU, ki je v postopku konverzije, in države, za katere je zahteval konverzijo.
The indication whether the earlier mark is registered or applied for.
Navedba, ali je prejšnja znamka registrirana ali prijavljena.
The Member State, including Benelux, where the earlier mark is registered/applied for or, if applicable, the indication that it is an EUTM.
Država članica, vključno z Beneluksom, v kateri je prejšnja znamka registrirana/prijavljena, ali po potrebi navedba, da gre za blagovno znamko EU.
If the Member State is not indicated in the opposition notice but a certificate is attached, it is considered that the Member State is sufficiently identified, even if the certificate is not in the language of the proceedings.
Če država članica v ugovoru ni navedena, vendar je priloženo potrdilo, se šteje, da je država članica zadostno opredeljena, tudi če potrdilo ni v jeziku postopka.
A translation of the certificate should not be asked for at this stage in the proceedings.
Prevod potrdila se v tej fazi postopka ne zahteva.
Where a certificate of an international registration is concerned it is assumed that the opposition is based on this mark in all the designated Member States and/or the Benelux countries indicated in the certificate.
Če je priloženo potrdilo o mednarodni registraciji, se domneva, da ugovor temelji na tej znamki v vseh imenovanih državah članicah in/ali državah Beneluksa, navedenih v potrdilu.
However, the basic registration is an independent earlier right, which may be claimed separately.
Vendar je osnovna prijava neodvisna prejšnja pravica, katere priznanje je mogoče zahtevati ločeno.
In the absence of the previous indications, the relevant right will be inadmissible.
Če zgornje navedbe manjkajo, bo zadevna pravica nedopustna.
The seniority claimed in an EUTM can be taken into account within the meaning of Article 8(2)(a) EUTMR provided that the proprietor of the EUTM has surrendered the earlier mark or allowed it to lapse within the meaning of Article 39(3) EUTMR and that this fact is proved by the opponent.
Prednost starejše blagovne znamke, ki se zahteva v zvezi z blagovno znamko EU, se lahko upošteva v smislu člena 8(2)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če se je imetnik blagovne znamke EU v smislu člena 39(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU odpovedal prejšnji znamki ali je dopustil, da je potekla, in če vložnik ugovora to dokaže.
In such a case, the opponent must base its opposition on the European Union trade mark, explicitly claiming within the 3-month opposition period that the national mark continues to exist through the seniority claimed in the EUTM.
V takšnem primeru mora vložnik ugovora svoj ugovor opreti na blagovno znamko Evropske unije, pri čemer mora v trimesečnem roku za ugovor izrecno navesti, da nacionalna znamka še naprej obstaja na podlagi prednosti starejše blagovne znamke, ki se zahteva v zvezi z blagovno znamko EU.
A clear link must be established between the EUTM indicated and the earlier mark for which the seniority was claimed in the EUTM.
Dokazati je treba jasno povezavo med navedeno blagovno znamko EU in prejšnjo znamko, za katero se je v zvezi z blagovno znamko EU zahtevala prednost starejše blagovne znamke.