natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the opposition is withdrawn after the end of the cooling-off period the parties are notified.
Če je ugovor umaknjen po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, se o tem uradno obvesti stranki.
The opposition fee is not refunded.
Pristojbina za ugovor se ne povrne.
5.2.2.3 Withdrawal of the opposition after a decision has been taken
Umik ugovora po sprejetju odločbe
Following the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of 27/09/2006 in R 331/2006G, Optima, the Office accepts withdrawals of the opposition received during the appeal period after a decision on the opposition has been taken, even if no appeal has been filed.
V skladu z odločbo velikega odbora za pritožbe z dne 27/09/2006 in R 331/2006G, Optima, Urad dopušča umike ugovora, prejete v roku za pritožbo po sprejetju odločbe o ugovoru, tudi, če pritožba ni bila vložena.
However, the withdrawal will not have any effect on the decision, which remains valid.
Vendar umik nikakor ne vpliva na odločbo, ki ostane veljavna.
Confirmation of the withdrawal is sent to the parties, without any decision on costs being included in this communication.
Potrditev umika se pošlje strankama, vendar to sporočilo ne vsebuje odločitve o stroških.
The part on costs of the initial decision remains valid and can be enforced by the winning party.
Del o stroških v prvotni odločbi ostane veljaven in ga lahko uveljavlja stranka, ki je uspela v postopku.
The Office's database is updated accordingly to reflect the withdrawal of the opposition, and the application proceeds to registration.
Podatkovna zbirka Urada se ustrezno posodobi, da se upošteva umik ugovora, prijava pa se pošlje v registracijo.
For further information on withdrawals during appeal proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 1, Proceedings, paragraph 5.1.
Za več informacij o umikih med pritožbenim postopkom glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 1: Postopek, odstavek 5.1.
5.2.2.4 Language
Jezik
A withdrawal of the opposition must be in the language of the proceedings.
Umik ugovora mora biti v jeziku postopka.
5.2.3 Withdrawals of withdrawals/restrictions
Umiki umikov/omejitev
A party is only permitted to withdraw a previously submitted withdrawal/restriction if the Office receives its letter withdrawing the earlier withdrawal/restriction on the same day as the first submission.
Stranka lahko predhodno predložen umik/omejitev umakne le, če Urad njen dopis, s katerim umika prejšnji umik/omejitev, prejme isti dan kot prvo predložitev.
5.3 Decision on substance
Meritorna odločba
The decision on substance is taken only once the parties have submitted all that is required, and should deal only with those issues or earlier rights that are relevant for the outcome.
Meritorna odločba se sprejme šele, ko sta stranki predložili vse potrebno, v njej pa je treba obravnavati le tista vprašanja ali prejšnje pravice, ki so pomembne za izid.
There are two exceptions, which are when:
Obstajata izjemi, in sicer če:
the earlier right is not proven;
prejšnja pravica ni dokazana,
the earlier right has ceased to exist.
prejšnja pravica preneha obstajati.
5.3.1 Earlier right not proven
Prejšnja pravica, ki ni dokazana
Article 8(1) EUTMDR
Člen 8(1) Delegirane uredbe
If proof of existence, validity and scope of protection has not been filed properly for any of the earlier rights invoked, the opposition is rejected as soon as the time limit given to the opponent to complete its file has expired.
Če dokaz o obstoju, veljavnosti in obsegu varstva ni bil ustrezno predložen za nobeno od prejšnjih pravic, na katere se sklicuje vložnik ugovora, se ugovor zavrne takoj, ko se izteče rok, ki ga ima vložnik ugovora na voljo za dopolnitev spisa.
However, if the existence, validity and scope of protection of at least one earlier right have been proven, the proceedings will continue normally, and the non-substantiated rights will not be taken into account in the final decision on substance.
Vendar če so bili dokazani obstoj, veljavnost in obseg varstva vsaj ene prejšnje pravice, se bo postopek nadaljeval kot običajno, neutemeljene pravice pa se v končni meritorni odločbi ne bodo upoštevale.
5.3.2 Earlier right has ceased to exist
Prenehanje obstoja prejšnje pravice
If, in the course of the proceedings, the earlier right ceases to exist (e.g. because it has been declared invalid, or it has not been renewed), the final decision cannot be based on it.
Če prejšnja pravica preneha obstajati med postopkom ugovora (npr. ker je bila razglašena za neveljavno ali ni bila podaljšana), končna odločba ne more temeljiti na njej.
The opposition may only be upheld with respect to an earlier right that is valid at the moment when the decision is taken.
Ugovoru se lahko ugodi samo v zvezi s prejšnjo pravico, ki je veljavna v času sprejetja odločbe.
The reason why the earlier right ceases to have effect does not matter.
Razlog, zakaj je prejšnji pravici potekla veljavnost, ni pomemben.
Since the EUTM application and the earlier right that has ceased to have effect cannot coexist any more the opposition cannot be upheld to this extent.
Ker prijava blagovne znamke EU in prejšnja pravica, ki ji je potekla veljavnost, ne moreta več sočasno obstajati, ugovoru ni mogoče ugoditi na tej podlagi.
Such a decision would be unlawful (13/09/2006, T191/04, Metro, EU:T:2006:254, § 33-36).
Takšna odločba bi bila nezakonita (13/09/2006, T191/04, Metro, EU:T:2006:254, § 33-36).
Invalidation of any earlier right other than an EUTM cannot be detected by the Office.
Urad ne more biti seznanjen z razveljavitvijo prejšnje pravice, razen če je to blagovna znamka EU.
However, if one of the parties informs the Office of such invalidation, the other party must be heard, and it may be that the opposition will not be able to proceed on the basis of that earlier right.
Če pa ena od strank Urad obvesti o taki razveljavitvi, je treba drugo stranko zaslišati, pri čemer se lahko zgodi, da se ugovor ne more nadaljevati na podlagi te prejšnje pravice.
Before the decision is taken, the Office will check whether the earlier right invoked has become due for renewal in the meantime.
Urad bo pred sprejetjem odločbe preveril, ali je bilo treba medtem prejšnjo pravico, na katero se sklicuje vložnik ugovora, podaljšati.
If so, the Office will invite the opponent to prove the renewal of the mark.
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, bo Urad vložnika ugovora pozval, naj dokaže podaljšanje znamke.
This applies even if the mark is still within the grace period for renewal, if applicable.
To velja tudi, če je znamka še vedno v prehodnem obdobju za podaljšanje, če se to uporablja.
If the opponent does not submit the proof, the opposition will not be able to proceed on the basis of that earlier right.
Če vložnik ugovora ne predloži dokaza, se ugovor ne more nadaljevati na podlagi te prejšnje pravice.
Before the decision is taken, the Office may also check the documents on file to see whether the earlier right invoked is the subject of national post-registration proceedings.
Urad lahko pred sprejetjem odločbe preveri tudi dokumente v spisu, da ugotovi, ali v zvezi s prejšnjo pravico, na katero se sklicuje vložnik ugovora, poteka nacionalni postopek po registraciji.
If so, the Office will invite the opponent to submit evidence of the final outcome of the national proceedings.
Če je odgovor pritrdilen, bo Urad vložnika ugovora pozval, naj predloži dokaze o končnem izidu nacionalnega postopka.
If the opponent submits evidence showing that the national proceedings are still pending, the Office may suspend the opposition proceedings until a final decision has been taken in the proceedings that led to the suspension.
Če vložnik ugovora predloži dokaze, da nacionalni postopek še vedno poteka, lahko Urad začasno ustavi postopek ugovora, dokler ni sprejeta dokončna odločba v postopku, ki je privedel do začasne ustavitve.
5.4 Fee refund
Povračilo pristojbine
5.4.1 Opposition deemed not entered
Ugovor, ki se ne šteje za vloženega
Articles 46(3) and 181(1) EUTMR
Člena 46(3) in 181(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
If an opposition is deemed as not entered because of late or insufficient payment (see paragraph 2.2.2 above), the opposition fee, including any surcharge, must be refunded to the opponent.
Če se ugovor zaradi prepoznega ali nezadostnega plačila ne šteje za vloženega (glej odstavek 2.2.2 zgoraj), je treba vložniku ugovora povrniti pristojbino za ugovor, vključno z vsemi doplačili.
5.4.1.1 Opposition and withdrawal of the opposition filed the same date
Ugovor in umik ugovora, vložena istega dne
In cases where the opposition is withdrawn the same day it was filed, the Office refunds the opposition fee.
Če je ugovor umaknjen istega dne, kot je vložen, Urad povrne pristojbino za ugovor.
5.4.1.2 Refund after republication
Povračilo po ponovni objavi
If, after republication of the EUTM application in Part A.2 of the Bulletin due to a mistake by the Office, a ‘first publication opponent' wishes to withdraw its opposition as a consequence of the republication, the proceedings should be closed.
Če želi vložnik ugovora zoper prvo objavo po ponovni objavi prijave blagovne znamke EU v delu A.2 Biltena zaradi napake Urada svoj ugovor umakniti na podlagi ponovne objave, je treba postopek končati.
As the Office made a mistake with the first publication, the opposition fee will be reimbursed.
Ker je za napako pri prvi objavi odgovoren Urad, bo pristojbina za ugovor povrnjena.
5.4.2 Refund in view of withdrawals/restrictions of EUTM application
Povračilo pri umikih/omejitvah prijave blagovne znamke EU
5.4.2.1 EUTM application withdrawn/restricted before end of cooling-off period
Umik/omejitev prijave blagovne znamke EU pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje
Article 6(2), (3), (4) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 6(2), (3), (4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
If the applicant withdraws its EUTM application or withdraws all those goods and services against which the opposition is directed before or during the cooling-off period, the opposition proceedings are closed, there is no decision on costs, and the opposition fee must be refunded.
Če prijavitelj svojo prijavo blagovne znamke EU ali vse blago in storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen ugovor, umakne pred obdobjem za pobotanje ali med njim, se postopek ugovora konča, odločitev o stroških se ne sprejme, pristojbino za ugovor pa je treba povrniti.
5.4.2.2 Opposition withdrawn due to restriction of EUTM application within cooling-off period
Ugovor, umaknjen zaradi omejitve prijave blagovne znamke EU v obdobju za pobotanje
If the applicant withdraws some of the goods and services against which the opposition is directed during the cooling-off period, the Office invites the opponent to state whether it maintains the opposition (and, if so, against which of the remaining goods and services) or whether it withdraws it in view of the restriction.
Če prijavitelj nekatero blago in storitve, zoper katere je usmerjen ugovor, umakne med obdobjem za pobotanje, Urad vložnika ugovora pozove, naj navede, ali vztraja pri ugovoru (in če vztraja, zoper katero preostalo blago in storitve ugovarja) oziroma ali ga glede na omejitev umika.
If the opposition is then withdrawn, the opposition proceedings are closed, there is no decision on costs, and the opposition fee must be refunded.
Če je ugovor nato umaknjen, se postopek ugovora konča, odločitev o stroških se ne sprejme, pristojbino za ugovor pa je treba povrniti.
5.4.3 Multiple oppositions and refund of 50 % of opposition fee
Več ugovorov in 50-odstotno povračilo pristojbine za ugovor
Article 9(4) EUTMDR
Člen 9(4) Delegirane uredbe
In certain special cases concerning multiple oppositions, it is possible to refund 50 % of the opposition fee to an opponent.
V nekaterih posebnih primerih v zvezi z več ugovori se lahko vložniku ugovora povrne 50 % pristojbine za ugovor.
Two conditions must be met, as illustrated in the following example.
Kot je ponazorjeno v naslednjem primeru, morata biti izpolnjena dva pogoja:
One of the opposition proceedings was terminated by the rejection of the contested EUTM application in parallel opposition proceedings.
Eden od postopkov ugovora se je končal z zavrnitvijo izpodbijane prijave blagovne znamke EU v vzporednem postopku ugovora.
For example, there are four oppositions A, B, C and D (opponents A, B, C, D) against EUTM application X, and EUTM application X is rejected due to opposition A.
Na primer, obstajajo štirje ugovori A, B, C in D (vložniki ugovorov A, B, C, D) zoper prijavo blagovne znamke EU X in je prijava blagovne znamke EU X zavrnjena zaradi ugovora A.
The other oppositions (B, C and D) had been suspended before the commencement of the adversarial part (because a preliminary examination revealed that EUTM application X would probably be rejected in its entirety because of opposition A).
Drugi ugovori (B, C in D) so bili začasno ustavljeni pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka (ker se je pri predhodnem preizkusu izkazalo, da bo prijava blagovne znamke EU X verjetno v celoti zavrnjena zaradi ugovora A).
In this case, opponents B, C and D are refunded 50 % of the opposition fee.
V takšnem primeru se vložnikom ugovorov B, C in D povrne 50 % pristojbine za ugovor.
5.4.4 Cases where the opposition fee is not refunded
Primeri, v katerih se pristojbina za ugovor ne povrne
5.4.4.1 Opposition withdrawn before the end of the cooling-off period NOT due to a restriction
Ugovor, umaknjen pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje, vendar NE zaradi omejitve
Article 6(3), (4) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 6(3), (4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
If the opponent withdraws its opposition before the end of the cooling-off period and there has been no restriction of the EUTM application, the Office neither refunds the opposition fee nor takes a decision on costs.
Če vložnik ugovora ugovor umakne pred iztekom obdobja za pobotanje in prijava blagovne znamke EU ni bila omejena, Urad niti ne povrne pristojbine za ugovor niti ne sprejme odločitve o stroških.
5.4.4.2 Opponent's withdrawal is earlier
Ugovor, umaknjen pred omejitvijo
Article 6(3) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 6(3) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
When the opposition is withdrawn before the applicant restricts its application, the fee is not refunded.
Če je ugovor umaknjen, preden prijavitelj omeji svojo prijavo, se pristojbina za ugovor ne povrne.
Additionally, if the applicant withdraws its application following (e.g. as a reaction to) the withdrawal of the opposition, the fee is not refunded.
Na primer, če prijavitelj umakne svojo prijavo po umiku ugovora (npr. kot odziv na umik ugovora), se pristojbina ne povrne.
The same applies when the applicant restricts the application following a partial withdrawal of the opposition.
Enako velja, kadar prijavitelj omeji prijavo po delnem umiku ugovora.
5.4.4.3 Settlement between the parties before commencement of proceedings
Poravnava med strankama pred začetkom postopka
Article 6(2), (4) and (5) EUTMDR
Člen 6(2), (4) in (5) Delegirane uredbe
As regards the refund of the opposition fee, Article 6(5) EUTMDR only mentions this possibility if there is either a withdrawal or a restriction of the EUTM application.
V zvezi s povračilom pristojbine za ugovor je ta možnost v členu 6(5) Delegirane uredbe navedena samo, če je prijava blagovne znamke EU umaknjena ali omejena.
Therefore, if the proceedings end by an agreement that contains a mention of a withdrawal or restriction of the EUTM application, the opposition fee is refunded.
Če se torej postopek konča z dogovorom, ki vsebuje navedbo umika ali omejitve prijave blagovne znamke EU, se pristojbina za ugovor povrne.
In the other cases, the opposition fee is not refunded.
V drugih primerih se pristojbina za ugovor ne povrne.
5.4.4.4 Termination of proceedings for other reasons
Končanje postopka iz drugih razlogov
Articles 7, 45 and Article 92(2) EUTMR
Člena 7 in 45 ter člen 92(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Articles 5, 6 and Article 74(1) and (3) EUTMDR
Člena 5 in 6 ter člen 74(1) in (3) Delegirane uredbe
In cases where the application is rejected in accordance with:
Kadar je prijava zavrnjena v skladu s:
Article 7 EUTMR (rejection of an application on absolute grounds; on the Office's own initiative or because of third party observations), or
členom 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (zavrnitev prijave na podlagi absolutnih razlogov; na lastno pobudo Urada ali zaradi pripomb tretjih oseb) ali
Article 119(2) EUTMR (representation for non-EEA applicants),
členom 119(2) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (zastopanje prijaviteljev, ki niso iz EGP),
the opposition fee is not refunded as none of these situations is contemplated in the EUTMDR as a reason for refunding the opposition fee.
se pristojbina za ugovor ne povrne, ker nobeden od teh primerov ni predviden v Delegirani uredbi kot razlog za povračilo pristojbine za ugovor.
5.5 Decision on the apportionment of costs
Odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov
5.5.1 Cases in which a decision on costs must be taken
Primeri, v katerih je treba sprejeti odločitev o stroških
Article 6(4) EUTMDR
Člen 6(4) Delegirane uredbe
A decision on costs is taken in opposition proceedings that have passed the cooling-off period, that is to say, where the adversarial part of the proceedings has both started and come to an end.
Odločitev o stroških se sprejme v postopku ugovora, ki se je nadaljeval po obdobju za pobotanje, tj. ko se je začel in končal kontradiktorni del postopka.
If a decision on substance is taken, the decision on apportionment of costs is given at the end of the decision.
Če se sprejme meritorna odločba, je odločitev o porazdelitvi stroškov navedena na koncu odločbe.
In all other cases where the Opposition Division closes the case, a decision on costs is issued together with the closure letters unless the parties have informed the Office about an agreement on costs.
V vseh drugih primerih, kadar zadevo konča oddelek za ugovore, se odločitev o stroških izda skupaj z dopisi o končanju postopka, razen če sta stranki Urad obvestili o dogovoru o stroških.
5.5.2 Cases in which a decision on costs is not taken
Primeri, v katerih se odločitev o stroških ne sprejme
No decision on costs is taken for oppositions that are closed before or during the cooling-off period.
Odločitev o stroških se ne sprejme pri ugovorih, ki se končajo pred obdobjem za pobotanje ali med njim.
5.5.2.1 Agreement on costs
Dogovor o stroških
Article 109(6) EUTMR
Člen 109(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Whenever the parties have settled the opposition proceedings with an agreement that includes the costs, the Office will not issue a decision on costs.
Kadar stranki sporazumno končata postopek ugovora z dogovorom, ki vključuje stroške, Urad ne bo sprejel odločitve o stroških.
The same is true if the Office receives information signed by both parties stating that the parties have agreed on costs.
Enako velja, če Urad prejme obvestilo, ki sta ga podpisali obe stranki in v katerem je navedeno, da sta se dogovorili o stroških.
Such a request can also be sent in two separate letters to the Office.
Takšno zahtevo je Uradu mogoče poslati tudi v dveh ločenih dopisih.
This information must be received before the Office has confirmed the closure of the proceedings.
Urad mora to obvestilo prejeti, preden potrdi končanje postopka.
If the parties settle the opposition by mutual agreement, they are free not to include the cost issue.
Če stranki dosežeta sporazumno rešitev ugovora, se lahko prosto odločita, da ta rešitev ne bo vključevala vprašanja stroškov.
If no indication is given as to whether the parties have agreed on the costs, the Office will take a decision on costs immediately, together with its confirmation of the withdrawal/restriction.
Če ni nikjer navedeno, ali sta se stranki dogovorili o stroških, bo Urad nemudoma sprejel odločitev o stroških skupaj s potrditvijo umika/omejitve.
If the parties inform the Office that they have reached an agreement on costs after the withdrawal/restriction, the decision already issued on costs will not be revised by the Office.
Če stranki Urad obvestita, da sta se o stroških dogovorili po umiku/omejitvi, Urad ne bo spremenil že sprejete odločitve o stroških.
It is left to the parties to respect the agreement and not to ‘execute' the Office's decision on costs.
Stranki se lahko sami odločita, da bosta upoštevali dogovor in ne bosta izvršili odločitve Urada o stroških.
5.5.2.2 Information from potential ‘successful party'
Informacije stranke, ki bo verjetno uspela v postopku
When the party that would be entitled to be awarded costs according to the general rules described in paragraph 5.5.3 below informs the Office that it accepts each party bearing their own costs, no decision on costs is necessary.
Kadar stranka, ki bi bila upravičena do povrnitve stroškov v skladu s splošnimi pravili, opisanimi v odstavku 5.5.3 v nadaljevanju, Urad obvesti, da se strinja s tem, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške, odločitev o stroških ni potrebna.
The Office will refrain from taking a decision on costs whenever the potential ‘successful party' informs the Office that it agrees to share the costs, even if the ‘losing party' does not confirm its agreement.
Urad ne bo sprejel odločitve o stroških, kadar ga stranka, ki bo verjetno uspela v postopku, obvesti, da se strinja z delitvijo stroškov, tudi če stranka, ki ni uspela v postopku, ne potrdi svojega strinjanja.
The latest letters from both parties therefore have to be checked carefully before issuing a decision.
Pred sprejetjem odločitve je zato treba skrbno preveriti zadnje dopise obeh strank.
However, any such request sent by the losing party to the Office will simply be forwarded to the other party, and the decision on costs will be taken ex officio under normal rules.
Vendar bo vsaka takšna zahteva, ki jo Uradu pošlje stranka, ki ni uspela v postopku, poslana drugi stranki, odločitev o stroških pa bo sprejeta po uradni dolžnosti na podlagi običajnih pravil.
5.5.3 Standard cases of decisions on costs
Standardni primeri odločitev o stroških
The general rule is that the party that terminates the proceedings, by withdrawing the EUTM application (wholly or partially) or by withdrawing the opposition, will bear the fees incurred by the other party as well as all costs incurred by it that are essential to the proceedings.
Splošno pravilo je, da stranka, ki konča postopek z (popolnim ali delnim) umikom prijave blagovne znamke EU ali z umikom ugovora, plača pristojbine in stroške, ki so nastali drugi stranki in so nujni za potek postopka.
If both parties lose in part, a ‘different apportionment' has to be decided.
Če obe stranki izgubita v nekaterih delih, je treba določiti drugačno porazdelitev.
As a general rule, it is equitable that each party bears its own costs.
Praviloma je pravično, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.
A party that terminates the proceedings is deemed to have given in.
Za stranko, ki konča postopek, se šteje, da se je vdala.
The hypothetical outcome of the case if a decision on substance had become necessary is absolutely irrelevant.
Hipotetičen izid zadeve, če bi bila potrebna meritorna odločba, je popolnoma nepomemben.
In standard cases the result is the following.
V standardnih primerih je izid naslednji.
The applicant withdraws or restricts its application to the goods and services the opposition is not directed at (partial withdrawal).
Prijavitelj umakne ali omeji svojo prijavo na blago in storitve, zoper katere ugovor ni usmerjen (delni umik).
In these cases the applicant has to pay the costs.
V takšnem primeru mora prijavitelj plačati stroške.
The opponent withdraws its opposition without any restriction of the EUTM application as regards the contested goods and services after the cooling-off period.
Vložnik ugovora umakne svoj ugovor po izteku obdobja za pobotanje, ne da bi bila prijava blagovne znamke EU kakor koli omejena v zvezi z izpodbijanim blagom in storitvami.
The opponent has to pay the costs.
Stroške mora plačati vložnik ugovora.
Restriction of the application followed by withdrawal of the opposition (28/04/2004, T124/02 & T156/02, Vitataste, EU:T:2004:116, § 56).
Omejitev prijave, ki ji sledi umik ugovora (28/04/2004, T124/02 & T156/02, Vitataste, EU:T:2004:116, § 56).
In principle each party bears its own costs.
Načeloma vsaka stranka nosi svoje stroške.