natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EUTM application: MANSO DE VELASCO Earlier mark: VELASCO ES ‘Velasco' is a Spanish surname.
Prijava blagovne znamke EU: MANSO DE VELASCO Prejšnja znamka: VELASCO ES „Velasco“ je španski priimek.
The EUTM application can be understood as being composed of two surnames.
Prijavljeno blagovno znamko EU je mogoče razumeti tako, da je sestavljena iz dveh priimkov.
EUTM application: Antonio Basile Earlier mark: BASILE IT The signs are conceptually similar in that they share the same surname (para. 60).
Prijava blagovne znamke EU: Antonio Basile Prejšnja znamka: BASILE IT Znaka sta si pojmovno podobna, ker je obema skupen isti priimek (točka 60).
peerstorm / PETER STORM EU, UK English-speaking consumers will associate the surname ‘Storm' with bad weather (para. 67).
peerstorm/PETER STORM EU, UK Angleško govoreči potrošniki bodo priimek Storm povezali s slabim vremenom (točka 67).
BX, DE, ES, FR, IT, AT, PT The representation of a red mug on a bed of coffee beans.
BX, DE, ES, FR, IT, AT, PT Prikaz rdečega lončka na podlagi iz kavnega zrnja.
DE Part of the relevant public may recognise a peacock.
DE Del upoštevne javnosti bi lahko prepoznal pava.
BX The contested trade mark will be described as a businessman playing football.
BX Izpodbijana blagovna znamka bo opisana kot poslovnež, ki igra nogomet.
Sign Territory Concepts Case No
Znak Ozemlje Pojmi Št. zadeve
A bulldog with a citrus fruit in front of it.
Buldog z agrumom pred seboj.
EU The term ‘Rioja' in the earlier mark, which is itself conceptually strengthened by the representation of a bunch of grapes and a vine leaf, refers directly to grapevine products and, more particularly, to Rioja wine.
EU Izraz „Rioja“ v prejšnji znamki, ki je pojmovno okrepljen s prikazom grozda in trtnega lista, se nanaša neposredno na proizvode vinske trte, natančneje na vino iz pokrajine Rioja.
09/06/2010, T138/09, EU:T:2010:226; dismissed 24/03/2011, C388/10 P, EU:C:2011:185
09/06/2010, T138/09, EU:T:2010:226; pritožba zavrnjena dne 24/3/2011, C388/10 P, EU:C:2011:185
BL, BX, CY, DE, ES, FR, HU, RO, SK, IT The mark depicts a type of fish (a shark).
BL, BX, CY, DE, ES, FR, HU, RO, SK, IT Na znamki je prikazana vrsta ribe (morski pes).
The majority of the relevant language speakers will understand the term SPAIN in the contested mark as referring to that country.
Večina govorcev upoštevnih jezikov bo izraz SPAIN (Španija) v izpodbijani znamki razumela tako, kot da se nanaša na to državo.
The word ‘Tiburón' means ‘shark' in Spanish but will not be understood by the rest of the relevant public.
Beseda „Tiburón“ v španščini pomeni „morski pes“, vendar je preostali del upoštevne javnosti ne bo razumel.
Sign Territory Meaning Case No
Znak Ozemlje Pomen Št. zadeve
DE The word zero evokes the cardinal number 0. 16
DE Beseda zero (nič) izraža glavni števnik 0. 16
TV2000 (fig.)/TV1000 LT The signs are conceptually similar to the extent that they both share the idea of ‘television' combined with a round four-digit number, that furthermore correlate in the order of thousands (para. 47).
TV2000 (fig.)/TV1000 LT Znaka sta si pojmovno podobna, ker je obema skupna zamisel „televizije“ v povezavi z okroglo štirimestno številko, ki je poleg tega pri obeh zapisana kot tisočica (točka 47).
EU The BoA found that ‘7' had a meaning (para. 25).
EU Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil, da ima „7“ pomen (točka 25).
/ DE For the part of the relevant public that interprets the signs as the letter ‘e' and the part of the relevant public that interprets them as the letter ‘c', the signs are conceptually identical (para. 99).
/ DE Znaka sta za del upoštevne javnosti, ki ta znaka razlaga kot črko „e“, in del, ki ju razlaga kot črko „c“, pojmovno enaka (točka 99).
/ et al. EU The signs were considered conceptually identical (paras 60-61).
/ in drugi EU Znaka sta se štela za pojmovno enaka (točki 60 in 61).
v DE The result of conceptual comparison is neutral.
proti DE Rezultat pojmovne primerjave je nevtralen.
It is not possible to infer from the appellant's argument that the name ‘Chtoura' designates an agricultural area in Lebanon renowned for its agricultural products that this meaning will also be familiar to trade circles in Germany.
Iz pritožnikove trditve, da ime „Chtoura“ označuje kmetijsko območje v Libanonu, znano po svojih kmetijskih proizvodih, ni mogoče sklepati, da bo ta pomen znan tudi trgovskim krogom v Nemčiji.
CLICK DE Conceptually, the contested mark ‘CLICK' is an English onomatopoeia that expresses a short, sharp sound.
CLICK DE Na pojmovni ravni je izpodbijana znamka „CLICK“ angleški onomatopejski izraz za kratek in oster zvok.
PSS ES The applicant's argument that the earlier mark could also be pronounced as an onomatopoeia [prompting another to be quiet] is far-fetched in view of the relevant information technology services at issue and the relevant public, who is accustomed, as noted by the applicant itself, to acronyms in this field (para. 42).
PSS ES Prijaviteljevi trditvi, da bi bilo tudi prejšnjo znamko mogoče izgovarjati kot onomatopejski izraz (s katerim se osebi ukazuje, naj bo tiho), je težko verjeti, če upoštevamo zadevne storitve informacijske tehnologije in upoštevno javnost, ki je, kot je navedel prijavitelj sam, navajena na kratice na tem področju (točka 42).
Earlier sign Contested sign Opposition No
Prejšnji znak Izpodbijani znak Št. ugovora
Similar: the marks share the concept of SOL (= sun: ‘the star that is the source of light and heat for the planets in the solar system').
Podobni: znamkama je skupen pojem SOL (= „sonce: zvezda, ki je vir svetlobe in toplote za planete v sončnem sistemu“).
BLUE ECOBLUE 12/11/2008, T281/07, EU:T:2008:489; (dismissed 22/01/2010, C23/09 P, EU:C:2010:35 (EU)
BLUE ECOBLUE 12/11/2008, T281/07, EU:T:2008:489; (zavrnjena 22/01/2010, C23/09 P, EU:C:2010:35 (EU)
The marks at issue are conceptually similar because they both refer to the colour blue.
Sporni znamki sta si pojmovno podobni, ker se obe nanašata na modro barvo.
The marks above are conceptually similar because both refer to the concept of MUSIC (= ‘the art of arranging sounds in time so as to produce a continuous, unified, and evocative composition, as through melody, harmony, rhythm, and timbre').
Zgornji znamki sta si pojmovno podobni, ker se obe nanašata na pojem MUSIC (= „glasba: umetnost razporeditve zvokov v času, tako da nastane kontinuirana, skladna in evokativna kompozicija, tako kot pri melodiji, harmoniji, ritmu in barvi tona“).
29/09/2008, B 1 220 724 (BL, BX, CY, CZ, DE, ES, FR, HU, RO, SK and IT)
29/09/2008, B 1 220 724 (BL, BX, CY, CZ, DE, ES, FR, HU, RO, SK in IT)
The marks above are conceptually similar because both signs have an image of the same fish (a shark) and a reference to the word SHARK (= ‘any of numerous chiefly marine carnivorous fishes of the class Chondrichthyes (subclass Elasmobranchii) … '.
Zgornji znamki sta si pojmovno podobni, ker oba znaka vsebujeta podobo iste ribe (morskega psa) in sklicevanje na besedo SHARK (= „morski pes: katera koli od številnih, predvsem morskih mesojedih rib razreda Chondrichthyes (podrazred Elasmobranchii) …“).
The Court found that the signs were almost identical conceptually.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da sta znaka pojmovno skoraj enaka.
Servus et al. SERVO SUO 29/02/2012, T525/10, EU:T:2012:96 (EU, IT in particular)
Servus in drugi SERVO SUO 29/02/2012, T525/10, EU:T:2012:96 (EU, zlasti IT)
The signs are conceptually similar from the point of view of the average Italian consumer insofar as both signs share a reference to ‘servant'.
Znaka sta si z vidika povprečnega italijanskega potrošnika pojmovno podobna, ker oba vsebujeta sklicevanje na „služabnika“.
The Court confirmed the BoA finding that the Italian public was likely to perceive the meaning of the Latin word ‘SERVUS', given its proximity to the Italian word ‘SERVO'.
Sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitev odbora za pritožbe, da bo italijanska javnost verjetno zaznala pomen latinske besede „SERVUS“, ker je podobna italijanski besedi „SERVO“.
For the relevant Spanish public, both signs invoke the concept of an olive.
Upoštevna španska javnost oba znaka povezuje s pojmom oljke.
There is no evidence that the relevant Spanish consumer will understand the English word ‘live'.
Ni dokaza, da bo upoštevni španski potrošnik razumel angleško besedo „live“.
Both marks refer to the word yogurt and consequently share the concept of ‘a dairy product produced by bacterial fermentation of milk'.
Obe znamki se nanašata na besedo jogurt, zato jima je skupen pojem mlečnega proizvoda, izdelanega z bakterijsko fermentacijo mleka.
The above marks are conceptually similar because they both refer to the concept of ‘charisma' (= ‘the ability to develop or inspire in others an ideological commitment to a particular point of view').
Zgornji znamki sta si pojmovno podobni, ker se obe nanašata na pojem „karizma“ (= „sposobnost posameznika, da pri drugih osebah razvije ali vzbudi ideološko pripadnost določenemu stališču“).
VITAMINWATER (relevant territory Portugal) 28/11/2013, T410/12, EU:T:2013:615
VITAMINWATER (upoštevno ozemlje: Portugalska) 28/11/2013, T410/12, EU:T:2013:615
The relevant territory is Spain.
Upoštevno ozemlje je Španija.
‘El lancero' (in Spanish) means ‘le lancier' in French.
„El lancero“ (v španščini) pomeni „le lancier“ v francoščini.
Conceptually, the GC concluded that the average Spaniard only had a limited knowledge of French and that the expression ‘le lancier' did not belong to the basic vocabulary of that language.
S pojmovnega vidika je Splošno sodišče ugotovilo, da ima povprečni Španec le omejeno znanje francoščine in da izraz „le lancier“ ni del osnovnega besedišča tega jezika.
Conceptually, the signs are not similar.
Znaka si pojmovno nista podobna.
T424/10 (identity)
T424/10 (enakost)
12/04/2012, R 703/20112 (identity)
12/04/2012, R 703/20112 (enakost)
17/06/2011, R 1107/20102 (identity)
17/06/2011, R 1107/20102 (enakost)
The GC considered that the Board was right in finding that the signs are conceptually different given that the earlier mark, due to its figurative element and the way in which the letter ‘b' is depicted, could evoke a boomerang whereas this is not the case for the mark applied for (para. 36).
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da je odbor pravilno ugotovil, da sta znaka pojmovno različna, ker bi lahko prejšnja znamka zaradi svojega figurativnega elementa in načina prikaza črke „b“ spominjala na bumerang, za prijavljeno znamko pa to ne velja (točka 36).
The mark applied for resembles an armorial emblem recalling the distinctive symbol associated with nobility or guilds used to identify people or professions, whereas the earlier marks are more akin to a seal indicating the mark of a sovereign authority such as that of the State and are designed to certify, or even seal, a particular object (para. 48).
Znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, je podobna grbovnemu emblemu, razlikovalnemu simbolu, povezanemu s plemstvom ali cehi, ki se je uporabljal za označevanje ljudi ali poklicev, prejšnje znamke pa bolj spominjajo na pečat, znamko suverenega organa, kot je država, ki je namenjena potrditvi ali celo zapečatenju nekega predmeta (točka 48).
17/04/2008, T389/03, EU:T:2008:114 (EU, identity for part of the public that perceives a pelican in the contested mark).
17/04/2008, T389/03, EU:T:2008:114 (EU, enakost za del javnosti, ki pri izpodbijani znamki zaznava pelikana)
VIKING VIKING PRUX Invented example
VIKING VIKING PRUX Izmišljen primer
VIKING DREMBL VIKING PRUX Invented example
VIKING DREMBL VIKING PRUX Izmišljen primer
The relevant territory is the European Union.
Upoštevno ozemlje je Evropska unija.
The goods at issue are cosmetics in Class 3.
Zadevno blago so kozmetični izdelki iz razreda 3.
The word ‘VIKING' is understood throughout the European Union and is distinctive for the goods at issue.
Beseda „VIKING“ je razumljena po vsej Evropski uniji in ima za zadevno blago razlikovalni učinek.
The words ‘PRUX' and ‘DREMBL' have no meaning.
Besedi „PRUX“ in „DREMBL“ sta brez pomena.
The signs are conceptually highly similar.
Znaka sta pojmovno zelo podobna.
VIKING Invented example
VIKING Izmišljen primer
The additional figurative elements do not introduce any concept capable of altering the conceptual perception of the signs.
Dodatni figurativni elementi nimajo nobene pojmovne vsebine, s katero bi se lahko spremenila pojmovna zaznava znakov.
The signs are conceptually identical.
Znaka sta pojmovno enaka.
Earlier sign Contested sign Reason Case No
Prejšnji znak Izpodbijani znak Razlog Št. zadeve
BEYOND VINTAGE BEYOND RETRO Coinciding first word 30/04/2014, T170/12, EU:T:2014:238
BEYOND VINTAGE BEYOND RETRO Prva beseda se ujema 30/04/2014, T170/12, EU:T:2014:238
SCHUHPARK JELLO SCHUHPARK The earlier trade mark is identical to the second word of the EUTM application.
SCHUHPARK JELLO SCHUHPARK Prejšnja blagovna znamka je enaka drugi besedi v prijavi blagovne znamke EU.
ip_law@mbp MBP The sign ‘@'separates the earlier mark in ‘ip-law' and ‘mbp' (para. 53).
ip_law@mbp MBP Znak „@“ deli prejšnjo znamko na sestavna dela „ip_law“ in mbp (točka 53).
The letters ‘FŁK' have an independent role in the EUTM application due to the red colour (para. 48).
V prijavi blagovne znamke EU imajo črke „FŁK“ zaradi rdeče barve samostojno vlogo (točka 48).
TRONIC The common element ‘TRONIC' is separated visually due to its white letters (para. 38).
TRONIC Skupni element „TRONIC“ je zaradi belih črk vizualno ločen (točka 38).
MARINE BLEU BLUMARINE The part ‘marine' in the EUTM application will be understood as a reference to the sea and ‘blu' as a misspelling of ‘blue'.
MARINE BLEU BLUMARINE V prijavi blagovne znamke EU bo del „marine“ razumljen kot namigovanje na morje, „blu“ pa kot napačen zapis besede „blue“ (moder).
CADENACOR COR The Spanish-speaking public will identify the elements ‘cadena' and ‘cor' in the earlier TM (para. 47) - likelihood of confusion.
CADENACOR COR Špansko govoreča javnost bo v prejšnji znamki prepoznala elementa „cadena“ in „cor“ (točka 47) - verjetnost zmede.
BLUE ECOBLUE The relevant public will split the EUTM application into the commonly used prefix ‘eco' and the word ‘blue' (para. 30) - likelihood of confusion.
BLUE ECOBLUE Upoštevna javnost bo prijavo blagovne znamke EU razstavila v pogosto uporabljeno predpono „ec“o in besedo „blue“ (točka 30) - verjetnost zmede.
12/11/2008, T281/07, EU:T:2008:489; confirmed 22/01/2010, C23/09 P, EU:C:2010:35
12/11/2008, T281/07, EU:T:2008:489; potrjena 22/01/2010, C23/09 P, EU:C:2010:35
CS CScreen The contested sign will probably be broken down into the elements ‘C' and ‘Screen', which has a meaning highly relevant for computers and their peripherals.
CS CScreen Verjetno se bo izpodbijani znak razstavil v elementa „C“ in „Screen“, ki ima pomen, ki je zelo pomemben pri računalnikih in zunanjih napravah.
It will not be perceived as containing the separate entity ‘CS' corresponding to the earlier mark.
Ne bo se zaznalo, da vsebuje ločen element „CS“, ki se ujema s prejšnjo znamko.
The element ‘force' has a weak distinctive character for the goods concerned.
Element „force“ ima pri zadevnem blagu šibek razlikovalni učinek.
Low visual, phonetic and conceptual similarity - no likelihood of confusion.
Nizka stopnja vizualne, zvočne in pojmovne podobnosti - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The presence of the ‘+' sign in both signs cannot generate a visual similarity as this is a mathematical symbol that implies a concept of increase, so it only enjoys a weak distinctive character (para. 29).
Zaradi znaka „+“ v obeh znakih ne more nastati vizualna podobnost, saj je to matematični simbol, ki se nanaša na pojem povečanja, zato ima le šibak razlikovalni učinek (točka 29).
The signs share a weak similarity on the phonetic side because of the presence of the ‘+' sign (paras 35-36) - no likelihood of confusion.
Znaka sta zaradi znaka „+“ malo zvočno podobna (točki 35 in 36) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
As regards the common initial part of the marks ‘visco', it is descriptive for the German public with relation to one of the main characteristics of the relevant goods (oils, greases and fuels), namely its viscosity (para. 57).
Skupni prvi del znamk „visco“ se za nemško javnost opisno nanaša na eno od glavnih značilnosti zadevnega blaga (olja, masti in goriva), in sicer z viskoznostjo (točka 57).
The marks are only vaguely similar visually and phonetically - no likelihood of confusion.
Znamki sta vizualno in zvočno le malce podobni - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The word premium is laudatory (para. 44).
Beseda premium je poveličevalna (točka 44).
The coincidence leads only to a low visual and phonetic and an average conceptual similarity - no likelihood of confusion.
Zaradi ujemanja obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti ter povprečna stopnja pojmovne podobnosti - ni verjetnosti zmede.
The word ‘ultimate' is a promotional word used to indicate the superior quality of the latest goods available on the market and, has no distinctive character at all (para. 22).
Beseda „ultimate“ je promocijska, uporablja se za navedbo vrhunske kakovosti najnovejšega blaga, ki je na voljo na trgu, in nima nikakršnega razlikovalnega učinka (točka 22).
Even if both trade marks share this element, there is only a low visual and phonetic similarity (paras 47-48).
Čeprav je ta element skupen obema blagovnima znamkama, obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne in zvočne podobnosti (točki 47 in 48).
No conceptual similarity overall (para. 49) - no likelihood of confusion.
Na ravni znamk kot celote ni pojmovne podobnosti (točka 49) - ni verjetnosti zmede.
As regards the visual comparison, the figurative element representing a dog in the earlier mark constitutes the dominant one.
Kar zadeva vizualno primerjavo, je figurativni element prejšnje znamke, ki prikazuje psa, prevladujoči element.
Given that the respective graphic elements are different, the coincidence in the word element ‘K9' leads to a visual similarity only to a low degree.
Ker se grafični elementi med znamkama razlikujejo, zaradi ujemanja besednega elementa „K9“ obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti.
The marks are phonetically similar to a high degree.
Znamki imata visoko stopnjo zvočne podobnosti.
As to the conceptual comparison, the contested mark does not contain any figurative element conveying the concept of a dog, the marks are not conceptually similar (paras 27-34).
Kar zadeva pojmovno primerjavo, izpodbijana znamka ne vsebuje nobenega figurativnega elementa, ki izraža pomen psa, zato znamki pojmovno nista podobni (točke 27-34).
(NEGRA MODELO) 06/03/2002, R 536/20013; confirmed 15/02/2005, T169/02, EU:T:2005:46
(NEGRA MODELO) 06/03/2002, R 536/20013; potrjena 15/02/2005, T169/02, EU:T:2005:46
The earlier trade mark was a Portuguese registration.
Prejšnja blagovna znamka je bila registrirana na Portugalskem.
‘Negra' is descriptive for the relevant goods in Class 33, since it may be used in Portuguese to designate brown beer, i.e. the type of beer sold under the trade mark NEGRA MODELO.
Izraz „Negra“ je za upoštevno blago iz razreda 33 opisen, ker se v portugalščini lahko uporabi za označitev temnega piva, tj. vrste piva, ki se prodaja pod blagovno znamko NEGRA MODELO.
The attention of the average Portuguese consumer will be focused on the coinciding word ‘modelo'.
Pozornost povprečnega portugalskega potrošnika bo osredotočena na besedo „modelo“, ki se ujema.
Low visual, average phonetic and strong conceptual similarity - likelihood of confusion.
Nizka stopnja vizualne, povprečna stopnja zvočne in visoka stopnja pojmovne podobnosti - verjetnost zmede.
G&S: Class 3 Territory: EU Assessment: The figurative element of the mark applied for is as important as the word elements and has a significant impact on the overall visual impression given by that mark.
Blago in storitve: Razred 3 Ozemlje: EU Presoja: Figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, je enako pomemben kot besedna elementa in ima precejšnji vpliv na celotni vizualni vtis, ki ga naredi ta znamka.
It is positioned above the word elements and occupies more space than both of those elements combined.
Postavljen je nad besedna elementa in zavzema več prostora kot oba ta elementa skupaj.
Furthermore, it is distinctive for the goods at hand, as a duck has no connection with cosmetic or cleaning preparations.
Poleg tega je za zadevno blago razlikovalen, saj raca ni povezana s kozmetičnimi ali čistilnimi pripravki.
In addition, the drawing of the duck is quite elaborate.
Risba race je tudi precej umetelno izdelana.
Even if the element ‘GIOVANNI' is placed before the element ‘GALLI', there is only a low degree of visual similarity between the marks at issue, in view of the significant impact of the figurative element of the mark applied for on the overall impression given by that mark (paras 62-64, 72, 74).
Čeprav je element „GIOVANNI“ postavljen pred element „GALLI“, med zadevnima znamkama obstaja le nizka stopnja vizualne podobnosti, saj ima figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, precejšnji vpliv na celotni vtis, ki ga ustvarja ta znamka (točke 62-64, 72 in 74).
G&S: Classes 32 and 33 Territory: Poland Assessment: the figurative element of the mark applied for, consisting of the stylised representation of a bovine animal viewed in profile looking to the left and which may be perceived as a European bison, is of a similar size to that of the verbal element ‘wisent' and occupies a comparable space in that mark.
Blago in storitve: Razreda 32 in 33 Ozemlje: Poljska Presoja: Figurativni element znamke, za katero je vložena prijava, ki ga sestavlja stiliziran prikaz goveda v profilu, ki gleda v levo in ki se ga lahko zazna kot zobra, je podobne velikosti kot besedni element wisent in v znamki zavzema primerljiv prostor.
As a result of its shape, its size, its colour and its position, that representation of a bison […] helps clearly to establish the image of the contested mark which the relevant public will retain in their mind, with the result that it cannot be discounted in the perception of that mark […].
Ta prikaz zobra je zaradi svoje oblike, velikosti, barve in položaja v pomoč pri ustvarjanju podobe izpodbijane znamke, ki si jo bo upoštevna javnost vtisnila v spomin, kar pomeni, da ga pri zaznavi te znamke ni mogoče zanemariti.
As regards the earlier mark, a naturalistic representation of a bison standing on four legs in a circle against a background of trees, coloured green, brown and black, is clearly perceptible in that mark.
Pri prejšnji znamki je jasno zaznaven naturalističen prikaz zobra, ki stoji na štirih nogah, v krogu pred drevesi v ozadju, obarvan zeleno, rjavo in črno.
That representation of a bison occupies a central position and is of a slightly larger size than the only perceptible verbal element, the term ‘żubrówka', represented in yellow and black and placed above that representation.
Ta prikaz zobra zavzema osrednji položaj in je malo večji od edinega zaznavnega besednega elementa, izraza „żubrówka“, prikazanega v rumeni in črni barvi ter postavljenega nad ta prikaz.
Therefore the figurative element consisting of a naturalistic representation of a bison cannot be discounted in the overall impression created by the earlier mark […].
Figurativnega elementa, ki ga sestavlja naturalističen prikaz zobra, pri celotnem vtisu, ki ga ustvarja prejšnja znamka, ni mogoče zanemariti.
Despite the presence of different verbal elements, as a whole the marks are visually similar to a low degree given the fact that they both contain a bison, the image of which will easily be retained by consumers in their memory as a result of their position within the marks at issue and their size (paras 76-77, 82, 85-86, 111, 113).
Čeprav so prisotni različni besedni elementi, imata znamki kot celoti nizko stopnjo vizualne podobnosti, saj obe vsebujeta zobra, katerega podobo si potrošniki zlahka vtisnejo v spomin zaradi njenega položaja in velikosti v zadevnih znamkah (točke 76, 77, 82, 85, 86, 111 in 113).