natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The trade mark must be assessed by reference to the standards and values of ordinary citizens who fall between those two extremes (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
Blagovno znamko je treba presojati s sklicevanjem na standarde in vrednote običajnih državljanov, ki so vmes med tema skrajnostma (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
As stated under ‘General remarks' above, national legislation and practice of Member States are indicators to be taken into account in order to assess how certain categories of signs are perceived by the relevant public in those Member States (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498, § 58).
Kot je navedeno v splošnih pripombah zgoraj, sta nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa držav članic merili, ki ju je treba upoštevati pri presoji, kako upoštevna javnost v teh državah članicah zaznava zadevne kategorije znakov (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498, § 58).
However, the Office must not object to trade marks because of the mere fact that they are in conflict with national legislation and practice.
Vendar Urad ne sme blagovnim znamkam nasprotovati samo zato, ker so v nasprotju z nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso.
National legislation and practice are considered to be factual evidence that enables an assessment of the perception of the relevant public within the relevant territory.
Nacionalna zakonodaja in praksa veljata za dejanski dokaz, ki omogoča presojo zaznavanja upoštevne javnosti na zadevnem ozemlju.
Examples of national legislation taken into account as evidence of a trade mark being contrary to accepted principles of morality:
Primeri nacionalne zakonodaje, ki se upošteva kot dokaz, da je blagovna znamka v nasprotju s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli:
use of symbols and names of unconstitutional parties or organisations is prohibited in Germany (§ 86a dt.
uporaba simbolov in imen protiustavnih strank ali organizacij je prepovedana v Nemčiji (§ 86a dt.
StGB (German Criminal Code), BGBl.
StGB (nemški kazenski zakonik), BGBl. št.
No I 75/1998) and in Austria (§ 1 öst.
I 75/1998) in v Avstriji (§ 1 öst.
Abzeichengesetz (Austrian Law on Insignias), BGBl.
Abzeichengesetz (avstrijski zakon o oznakah), BGBl. št.
No 84/1960 in conjunction with § 1 öst.
84/1960 v povezavi z § 1 öst.
Verbotsgesetz (Austrian Prohibition Law), BGBl.
Verbotsgesetz (avstrijski zakon o prepovedi), BGBl. št.
‘use of symbols of totalitarianism' (e.g. the sickle and hammer and the five-pointed red star), specifically in a way to offend the dignity of victims of totalitarian regimes and their right to sanctity is prohibited in Hungary (Section 335 of Act C of 2012 on the Criminal Code) (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498).
„uporaba simbolov totalitarizma“ (npr. srpa in kladiva ter petorokrake rdeče zvezde), zlasti na način, ki je žaljiv za dostojanstvo žrtev totalitarnih režimov in njihovo pravico do svetosti življenja, je prepovedana na Madžarskem (oddelek 335 zakona C iz leta 2012 o kazenskem zakoniku) (20/09/2011, T232/10, Coat of Arms of the Soviet Union, EU:T:2011:498).
Raising an objection when a trade mark is contrary to accepted principles of morality does not exclude, however, that the sign can also be contrary to public policy (e.g. the trade mark may be perceived by the relevant public as directly against the basic moral norms of society and at the same time, may contradict the basic principles and fundamental values of the EU political and social order).
Vložitev ugovora, kadar je blagovna znamka v nasprotju s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli, pa ne izključuje dejstva, da je znak lahko v nasprotju tudi z javnim redom (npr. upoštevna javnost lahko blagovno znamko zaznava kot znamko, ki je neposredno v nasprotju s temeljnimi moralnimi načeli družbe in ki lahko obenem nasprotuje temeljnim načelom in vrednotam političnega in družbenega reda EU).
The examination of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR should consider the context in which the mark is likely to be encountered, assuming normal use of the mark in connection with the goods and services covered by the application (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
Pri proučitvi člena 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU bi bilo treba upoštevati okvir, v katerem se bo znamka verjetno pojavila, ob predpostavki običajne uporabe znamke v povezavi z blagom in storitvami, ki jih prijava zajema (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 21).
Taking account of the goods and services for which registration of the mark is sought is normally necessary, since the relevant public may be different for different goods and services and, therefore, may have different thresholds with regard to what is clearly unacceptably offensive.
Običajno je treba upoštevati blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija znamke, saj je lahko upoštevna javnost različna za različno blago in storitve ter ima lahko zato različne prage glede tega, kaj je jasno in nesprejemljivo žaljivo.
For example, ‘a person who is sufficiently interested in [sex toys] to notice the trade marks under which they are sold is unlikely to be offended by a term with crude sexual connotations' (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 29).
Na primer, ni verjetno, da bo izraz s prostaškimi spolnimi konotacijami žaljiv za osebo, ki se dovolj zanima za [spolne pripomočke], da opazi blagovne znamke, pod katerimi se prodajajo (06/07/2006, R 495/2005G, SCREW YOU, § 29).
Nevertheless, although the Court has held that the goods and services for which protection is sought are important for identifying the relevant public whose perception needs to be examined, it has also made it clear that the relevant public is not necessarily only that which buys the goods and services covered by the mark, since a broader public than just the consumers targeted may encounter the mark (05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 17-18).
Čeprav Sodišče meni, da so blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva varstvo, pomembni za določitev upoštevne javnosti, katere zaznavanje je treba proučiti, je kljub temu jasno navedlo, da upoštevna javnost ni nujno samo tista, ki kupi blago in storitve, ki jih zajema znamka, saj se lahko z njo sreča tudi širša javnost, in ne samo ciljni potrošniki (05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 17-18).
Accordingly, the commercial context of a mark, in the sense of the public targeted by the goods and services, is not always the determining factor in whether that mark would breach accepted principles of morality (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
Zato komercialni okvir znamke v smislu ciljne javnosti za blago in storitve ni vedno odločilni dejavnik pri presoji, ali bi zadevna znamka kršila sprejeta moralna načela (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
Illegality is not a necessary condition for giving rise to a conflict with accepted principles of morality: there are words or signs that would not lead to proceedings before the relevant authorities and courts, but that are sufficiently offensive to the general public to not be registered as trade marks (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 16).
Nezakonitost ni nujen pogoj za nastanek nasprotovanja s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli: obstajajo besede ali znaki, ki ne bi privedli do postopka pred ustreznimi organi in sodišči, vendar so dovolj žaljivi za širšo javnost, da niso registrirani kot blagovne znamke (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 16).
Furthermore, there is an interest in ensuring that children and young people, even if they are not the relevant public of the goods and services in question, do not encounter offensive words in shops that are accessible to the general public.
Poleg tega obstaja interes za zagotovitev, da otroci in mladi, tudi če niso upoštevna javnost za zadevno blago in storitve, niso izpostavljeni žaljivim besedam v trgovinah, ki so dostopne širši javnosti.
Dictionary definitions will in principle provide a preliminary indication as to whether the word in question has an offensive meaning in the relevant language (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 25), but the key factor must be the perception of the relevant public in the specific context of how and where the goods or services will be encountered.
Slovarske opredelitve pojmov so načeloma predhodni znak, ali ima zadevna beseda žaljiv pomen v upoštevnem jeziku (01/09/2011, R 168/20111, fucking freezing! by TÜRPITZ (fig.), § 25), ključni dejavnik pa mora biti zaznava upoštevne javnosti v posebnem okviru tega, kako in kje bodo blago ali storitve na voljo.
However, the Boards of Appeal took the view that the word ‘kuro' did not convey to the Hungarian public the offensive meaning of the word ‘kúró' (meaning ‘fucker' in English), since the vowels ‘ó' and ‘ú' are separate letters that are distinct from ‘o' and ‘u', which are pronounced differently and convey different meanings (22/12/2012, R 482/20121, kuro, § 12 et seq.).
Vendar je odbor za pritožbe menil, da beseda „kuro“ za madžarsko javnost nima žaljivega pomena besede „kúró“ (ki v slovenščini pomeni „fukač“), saj sta samoglasnika „ó“ in „ú“ ločeni črki, ki se razlikujeta od „o“ in „u“, ki se drugače izgovarjata in prinašata drug pomen (22/12/2012, R 482/20121, kuro, § 12 et seq.).
There is a clear risk that the wording of Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR could be applied subjectively so as to exclude trade marks that are not to the examiner's personal taste.
Obstaja jasno tveganje, da bi se lahko besedilo člena 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uporabljalo subjektivno za izključitev znamk, ki ne ustrezajo osebnemu okusu preizkuševalca.
However, for the word(s) to be objectionable, it (they) must have a clearly offensive impact on people of normal sensitivity (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
Da je (so) beseda(-e) sporna(-e), mora(-jo) imeti očitno žaljiv učinek na osebe, ki so občutljive, kot je to običajno (09/03/2012, T417/10, ¡Que buenu ye!
There is no need to establish that the applicant wants to shock or insult the relevant public; the fact that the EUTM applied for might be seen, as such, to shock or insult is sufficient (23/10/2009, R 1805/20071, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 27, confirmed 05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 20 et seq.).
Ni treba ugotoviti, da prijavitelj želi presuniti ali žaliti upoštevno javnost; zadostuje dejstvo, da bi bilo mogoče blagovno znamko EU, za katero je vložena prijava, šteti za nespodobno ali žaljivo samo po sebi (23/10/2009, R 1805/20071, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 27, potrjena 05/10/2011, T526/09, PAKI, EU:T:2011:564, § 20 et seq.).
Finally, it is not only signs with a ‘negative' connotation that can be offensive.
Žaljivi pa niso le znaki z negativno konotacijo.
The banal use of some signs with a highly positive connotation can also be offensive (e.g. terms with a religious meaning or national symbols with a spiritual and political value, like ‘ATATURK' for the EU general public of Turkish origin (17/09/2012, R 2613/20112, ATATURK, § 31)).
Tudi vsakdanja uporaba nekaterih znakov z zelo pozitivno konotacijo je lahko žaljiva (npr. izrazi z verskim pomenom ali nacionalni simboli z duhovno in politično vrednostjo, na primer izraz ATATURK za širšo javnost EU turškega rodu (17/09/2012, R 2613/20112, ATATURK, § 31).
Examples of rejected EUTM applications (public policy and/or morality)
Primeri zavrnjenih prijav za blagovno znamko EU (javni red in/ali morala)
Examples of accepted EUTM applications
Primeri sprejetih prijav blagovnih znamk EU
Sign Relevant Consumer Public policy/morality Case No
Znak Upoštevni potrošnik Javni red/morala Št. zadeve
BIN LADIN General consumer Morality and public policy - the mark applied for will be understood by the general public as the name of the leader of the notorious terrorist organisation Al Qaeda; terrorist crimes are in breach of public order and moral principles (para. 17).
BIN LADIN Običajni potrošnik Morala in javni red - znamko, za katero je vložena prijava, bo širša javnost razumela kot ime vodje zloglasne teroristične organizacije Al Kaida, teroristična kazniva dejanja kršijo javni red in moralna načela (točka 17).
CURVE 300 General consumer Morality - ‘Curve' is an offensive and vulgar word in Romanian (it means ‘whores').
CURVE 300 Običajni potrošnik Morala - „Curve“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v romunščini (pomeni „kurbe“).
CURVE General consumer Morality - ‘Curve' is an offensive and vulgar word in Romanian (it means ‘whores').
CURVE Običajni potrošnik Morala - „Curve“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v romunščini (pomeni kurbe).
The relevant public is not limited only to the public to which the goods and services covered by the mark are directly addressed.
Upoštevna javnost ni samo javnost, ki so ji blago in storitve, ki jih zajema znamka, neposredno namenjeni.
‘Curve' equally offends other persons, who are confronted with the sign accidentally without being interested in these goods and services (para. 19).
Beseda „curve“ je enako žaljiva za druge osebe, ki se z znakom srečajo naključno, ne da bi se zanimale za to blago in storitve (točka 19).
With regard to the word ‘Curve'+ additions [‘AIRCURVE'], see example below in this paragraph (R 203/20142).
V zvezi z besedo „curve“ in dodatki [„AIRCURVE“] glej primer v nadaljevanju tega odstavka (R 203/20142).
General consumer Morality - ‘fucking' is an offensive and vulgar word in English.
Običajni potrošnik Morala - „fucking“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v angleščini.
General consumer Morality - ‘HIJOPUTA' is an offensive and vulgar word in Spanish.
Običajni potrošnik Morala - „HIJOPUTA“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v španščini.
General consumer Morality - the Hungarian Criminal Code bans certain ‘symbols of despotism', including the hammer and sickle as well as the five-pointed red star symbolising the former USSR.
Običajni potrošnik Morala - madžarski kazenski zakonik prepoveduje nekatere „simbole despotizma“, vključno s kladivom in srpom ter peterokrako rdečo zvezdo, ki simbolizira nekdanjo ZSSR.
This law is not applicable by reason of its normative value but rather as evidence of the perception of the relevant public (paras 59-63) .
Ta odredba se ne uporablja zaradi normativne vrednosti, temveč kot dokaz o tem, kako upoštevna javnost zaznava znak (točke 59-63).
3: The Hungarian Criminal Code, in force at the time of the judgment (20/09/2011), has been amended by Act C of 2012 to now encompass ‘Use of Symbols of Totalitarianism', used ‘specifically in a way to offend the dignity of victims of totalitarian regimes and their right to sanctity' (formerly Section 269/B, now Section 335 of the Hungarian Criminal Code).]
3: Madžarski kazenski zakonik, ki je veljal v času sodbe (20. septembra 2011), je bil spremenjen z aktom C iz leta 2012 in danes zajema uporabo simbolov totalitarizma, ki se uporabljajo posebej na način, ki je žaljiv za dostojanstvo žrtev totalitarnih režimov in njihovo pravico do svetosti življenja (prej oddelek 269/B, zdaj oddelek 335 madžarskega kazenskega zakonika).]
PAKI General consumer Morality - ‘PAKI' is a racist insult in English.
PAKI Običajni potrošnik Morala - „PAKI“ je rasistična žaljivka v angleščini.
SCREW YOU General consumer (for goods other than sex products) Morality - a substantial proportion of ordinary citizens in Britain and Ireland would find the words ‘SCREW YOU' offensive and objectionable (para. 26).
SCREW YOU Običajni potrošnik (za blago, ki niso spolni pripomočki) Morala - Velik del navadnih državljanov v Veliki Britaniji in na Irskem bi besedi „SCREW YOU“ štel za žaljivi in sporni (točka 26).
FICKEN General consumer Morality - ‘FICKEN' is an offensive and vulgar word in German (it means ‘fuck').
FICKEN Običajni potrošnik Morala - „FICKEN“ je žaljiva in vulgarna beseda v nemščini (pomeni fukati).
ATATURK Average consumer in the EU general public of Turkish origin Morality - banal use of signs with a highly positive connotation can be offensive under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.
ATATURK Povprečen potrošnik splošne javnosti EU turškega rodu Morala - v skladu s členom 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je lahko vsakdanja uporaba znakov z zelo pozitivno konotacijo žaljiva.
‘ATATURK' is a national symbol of spiritual and political value for the European general public of Turkish origin.
„ATATURK“ je nacionalni simbol z duhovno in politično vrednostjo za pripadnike splošne evropske javnosti turškega rodu.
FUCK CANCER General consumer Morality - the word ‘FUCK' is not only a ‘slightly rude word' in combination with the word ‘CANCER', but offensive and indecent, at least for the English-speaking part of the trade circles (para. 19).
FUCK CANCER Običajni potrošnik Morala - beseda „FUCK“ ni samo malce nevljudna beseda v kombinaciji z besedo „CANCER“, temveč je tudi žaljiva in nespodobna, vsaj za angleško govorečo upoštevno javnost (točka 19).
MECHANICAL APARTHEID General consumer Public policy - ‘APARTHEID' refers to an offensive former political regime in South Africa that included state terror, torture and the denial of human dignity.
MECHANICAL APARTHEID Običajni potrošnik Javni red - „APARTHEID“ se nanaša na žaljiv nekdanji politični režim v Južni Afriki, ki je vključeval državni teror, mučenje in zanikanje človekovega dostojanstva.
The message conveyed by the sign for computer games, related publications and entertainment is contrary to the European Union's public policy, since it contradicts the indivisible, universal values on which the EU is founded, i.e. human dignity, freedom, physical integrity, equality and solidarity, and the principles of democracy and the rule of law (para. 30).
Sporočilo, ki ga prenaša znak računalniških iger, povezan s publikacijami in zabavo, je v nasprotju z javnim redom Evropske unije, saj zanika nedeljive, univerzalne vrednote, na katerih temelji EU, tj. človekovo dostojanstvo, svobodo, telesno celovitost, enakost in solidarnost ter načeli demokracije in pravne države (točka 30).
MH17 MH370 General consumer Morality - acronyms of the flights.
MH17 MH370 Običajni potrošnik Morala - kratice poletov.
The trade mark application ‘Fack Ju Göhte' contains the phonetic reproduction in German of the expression ‘Fuck you'.
Prijava blagovne znamke „Fack Ju Göhte“ vsebuje fonetično reprodukcijo izraza „fuck you“ v nemščini.
It is true that the sign also contains the word ‘Göhte'; however, the decisive factor is that the dominant component at the beginning of the trade mark application ‘Fack ju' is already so insulting and offensive that the relevant public will be offended by it' (para 32).
Res je, da znak vsebuje tudi besedo „Göhte“, vendar je odločilen dejavnik ta, da je prevladujoč element „Fack ju“ na začetku prijave blagovne znamke že sam dovolj žaljiv, da bo užalil tudi upoštevno javnost (točka 32).
01/12/2016, R 2205/20155, under appeal, T69/17)
01/12/2016, R 2205/20155, predmet pritožbe, T69/17
General consumer Public policy and morality - mafia-type organised crime is a clear and present threat to the whole of the EU.
Običajni potrošnik Javni red in morala - organizirani kriminal mafijskega tipa je jasna in navzoča grožnja za vso EU.
The EU's policies have evolved in the context of manifold international efforts to tackle this threat.
V okviru številnih mednarodnih prizadevanjih so se razvile politike EU za spopadanje s to grožnjo.
The EU has both codrafted and drawn on international laws and standards, resulting in a comprehensive anti-organised crime policy.
EU je sodelovala pri pripravi osnutkov in oblikovanju mednarodnih predpisov in standardov, na podlagi katerih je nastala celovita politika za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu.
The Amsterdam Treaty (1997) provided a legal base for approximating criminal legislation, including that on organised crime.
Amsterdamska pogodba (1997) je zagotovila pravno podlago za približevanje kazenske zakonodaje, vključno z zakonodajo v zvezi z organiziranim kriminalom.
The Lisbon Treaty (2009) substantially strengthened the EU's standing in this field (para 28).
Lizbonska pogodba (2009) je pomembno okrepila položaj EU na tem področju (točka 28).
In view of the above, the contested trade mark, which manifestly promotes the name of the criminal organisation Mafia in large letters, must be considered to be against public policy and should therefore not be protected as an EUTM.
Na podlagi navedenega je treba šteti, da je izpodbijana blagovna znamka, ki očitno ponazarja ime kriminalne združbe Mafia z velikimi črkami, v nasprotju z javnim redom in zato ne bi smela biti zaščitena kot blagovna znamka EU.
The trade mark distorts therewith the grave perception this name conveys (paras 30-31).
Blagovna znamka s tem izkrivlja resen pomen, ki jo ta beseda vsebuje (točki 30 in 31).
In this case it has been clearly shown that Italian society is deeply disturbed by the use of the contested trade mark for everyday consumer goods and services, especially restaurant services (para 32).
V tem primeru se jasno kaže, da je uporaba sporne blagovne znamke v zvezi z vsakdanjim potrošniškim blagom in storitvami, zlasti gostinskimi storitvami, močno vznemirjujoča za italijansko družbo (točka 32).
27/10/2016, R 803/20161, under appeal, T1/17
27/10/2016, R 803/20161, predmet pritožbe, T1/17
ETA General consumer Public policy and morality - ‘ETA' will be immediately understood in Europe, in particular in Spain, as designating the terrorist group ETA (para 2).
ETA Običajni potrošnik Javni red in morala - kratica „ETA“ bo v Evropi, zlasti v Španiji, takoj razumljena kot oznaka za teroristično skupino ETA (točka 2).
ETA is included on the list of individuals and groups facilitating, attempting to commit or committing terrorist acts in EU territory (Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27/12/2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism updated by Council Common Position 2009/64/CFSP) (para. 14).
ETA je vključena na seznam posameznikov in skupin, ki omogočajo izvajanje, poskušajo izvajati ali izvajajo teroristična dejanja na ozemlju EU (Skupno stališče Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu, kot je dopolnjeno s Skupnim stališčem Sveta 2009/64/SZVP (točka 14).
In a commercial context, the term ‘ETA' has the inherent tendency to shock any normal person who hears or reads it and, in particular, members of the Spanish public who particularly keep that name in mind.
V komercialnem okviru je neločljivo povezan namen izraza „ETA“ presuniti vsako normalno osebo, ki jo sliši ali prebere, zlasti pripadnike španske javnosti, ki so si to ime še posebej zapomnili.
The fact that ETA is not currently considered to be the biggest threat facing Spain according to an extract from a survey conducted in June 2015 provided by the applicant, does not mean that the term will not continue to be associated with the terrorist group in question in the mind of the public (para. 15).
Dejstvo, da ETA danes ne velja več za največjo grožnjo, s katero se spopada Španija, kar dokazuje izvleček iz raziskave, opravljene junija 2015, ki ga je predložil prijavitelj, ne pomeni, da javnost tega pojma ne bo več povezovala z zadevno teroristično skupino (točka 15).
Cannabis with a high THC content is considered to be a narcotic that is prohibited in a large number of Member States (19/11/2009, T234/06, Cannabis, EU:T:2009:448).
Marihuana z visoko vsebnostjo THC velja za drogo, ki je prepovedana v številnih državah članicah (19/11/2009, T234/06, Cannabis, EU:T:2009:448).
Non-psychoactive substances are legal and the authorities can issue licences for their cultivation for those purposes.
Snovi, ki niso psihoaktivne, so dovoljene, organi pa lahko za njihovo vzgojo za te namene izdajo dovoljenja.
However, due to its high THC content, in this case the product concerned is not non-psychoactive, but is a substance for smoking that is strictly controlled in almost all European Union countries (para 22).
V tem primeru pa zadevni proizvod zaradi visoke vsebnosti THC ne velja za snov, ki ni psihoaktivna, temveč gre za snov za kajenje, ki je pod strogim nadzorom v skoraj vseh državah Evropske unije (točka 22).
Sign Relevant Consumer Comment Case No
Znak Upoštevni potrošnik Pripomba Št. zadeve