natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Therefore, any advantage gained by the advertiser through such advertising will have been achieved as a result of unfair competition and must be regarded as taking unfair advantage of the reputation of that mark).
Zato je kakršna koli korist, ki jo je oglaševalec pridobil s takim oglaševanjem, posledica nepoštene konkurence in jo je treba obravnavati kot neupravičeno izkoriščanje ugleda te znamke.
‘Taking account of the fact that the financial and stock market listing services supplied by the intervener under its trade mark Nasdaq and, therefore, the trade mark Nasdaq itself, undeniably present a certain image of modernity [the link between the signs] enables the transfer of that image to sports equipment and, in particular, to the high-tech composite materials which would be marketed by the applicant under the mark applied for, which the applicant appears to recognise implicitly by stating that the word ‘nasdaq' is descriptive of its main activities.
Glede na to, da finančne storitve in storitve kotiranja na borzi, ki jih intervenient zagotavlja pod svojo znamko Nasdaq, in zato tudi sama znamka Nasdaq nedvomno predstavljajo določeno podobo sodobnosti [zveza med znaki], ki se lahko prenese na športno opremo, zlasti pa na visokotehnološke sestavljene materiale, ki bi jih prijavitelj tržil pod znamko, za katero je vložena prijava, pri čemer se zdi, da prijavitelj to implicitno priznava s trditvijo, da beseda ‚„nasdaq“ opisuje njegove glavne dejavnosti.
Therefore, in light of that evidence, and taking account of the similarity of the marks at issue, the importance of the reputation and the highly distinctive character of the trade mark Nasdaq, it must be held that the intervener has established prima facie the existence of a future risk, which is not hypothetical, of unfair advantage being drawn by the applicant, by the use of the mark applied for, from the reputation of the trade mark Nasdaq.
Glede na te dokaze in ob upoštevanju podobnosti spornih znamk, pomembnosti ugleda ter zelo razlikovalnega značaja znamke Nasdaq je treba ugotoviti, da je intervenient na prvi pogled dokazal obstoj prihodnjega tveganja, ki ni hipotetično, da bo prijavitelj z uporabo znamke, za katero je vložil prijavo, neupravičeno izkoristil ugled znamke Nasdaq.
There is therefore no need to set aside the contested decision on that point' (paras 60 and 61).
Zato v zvezi s tem ni treba razveljaviti sporne odločbe (točki 60 in 61).
There is a certain proximity and link between entertainment services and beer, even a certain similarity due to their complementarity.
Med razvedrilom in pivom obstajata določena bližina in zveza ter celo določena stopnja podobnosti zaradi njunega dopolnjevanja.
The public in the United Kingdom would be able to make a link with the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) when seeing a beer with the contested mark Royal Shakespeare in a supermarket or in a bar.
Javnost v Združenem kraljestvu bi lahko znamko Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) povezala s pivom sporne znamke Royal Shakespeare, ko bi ga videla v trgovini ali baru.
The contested mark would benefit from the power of attraction, the reputation and the prestige of the earlier mark for its own goods and services, which would attract the consumers' attention thanks to the association with RSC, thereby gaining a commercial advantage over its competitors' goods.
Sporna znamka bi izkoristila privlačnost, ugled in prestiž prejšnje znamke za svoje blago in storitve, ki bi pritegnili pozornost potrošnikov zaradi asociacije na RSC in tako pridobili poslovno prednost pred blagom tekmecev.
The economic advantage would consist of exploiting the effort expended by RSC to establish the reputation and the image of its earlier mark without paying any compensation in exchange.
Ekonomska prednost bi izhajala iz izkoriščanja prizadevanj, ki jih je družba RSC vložila v pridobitev ugleda in izoblikovanje podobe prejšnje znamke, ne da bi bilo treba za to plačati nadomestilo.
That equates to an unfair advantage (para. 61).
To pa pomeni neupravičeno izkoriščanje (točka 61).
While recognising that the primary function of a trade mark was as an indicator of origin, the General Court held that a mark could also serve to transmit other messages, concerning particular qualities or characteristics of the designated goods or services, or the images and sensations projected by the mark itself, such as luxury, lifestyle, exclusivity, adventure or youth.
Splošno sodišče je ob upoštevanju, da je prvotna funkcija blagovne znamke označba izvora, ugotovilo, da lahko znamka prenaša tudi druga sporočila v zvezi s posebnimi lastnostmi ali značilnostmi zadevnega blaga ali storitev ali podobe in vtise, ki jih odraža znamka, kot so luksuz, življenjski slog, ekskluzivnost, dogodivščina ali mladost.
In this sense, a trade mark possessed an intrinsic economic value that was autonomous and distinct to that of the goods or services for which it was registered (para. 57).
Znamka ima v tem smislu bistveno tržno vrednost, ki je samostojna in se razlikuje od vrednosti blaga ali storitev, za katere je registrirana (točka 57).
The risk of taking unfair advantage encompasses cases of manifest exploitation or parasitism of a mark with reputation, namely the risk of transferring the image of the mark with reputation or the characteristics projected by it to the goods covered by the mark applied for, thus facilitating the marketing of those goods through association with the earlier mark with reputation (para. 59).
Tveganje neupravičenega izkoriščanja obsega primere očitnega izkoriščanja ali parazitstva znamke z ugledom, in sicer tveganje prenosa podobe znamke z ugledom ali lastnosti, ki jih odraža, na blago, ki ga zajema znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, s tem pa se olajša trženje tega blaga zaradi povezave s prejšnjo znamko z ugledom (točka 59).
The Court concluded that, even if the drinks claimed by the mark applied for would not in reality produce the same benefit as the ‘immensely well-known' pharmaceutical for the treatment of erectile dysfunction, what was important was that the consumer, because of the transfer of positive associations projected by the image of the earlier mark, would be inclined to purchase such drinks in the expectation of finding similar qualities, such as an increase in libido (paras 52 and 67).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da čeprav pijače, ki jih zajema znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, dejansko ne bi imele enakih koristi kot „zelo znano“ zdravilo za zdravljenje erektilne disfunkcije, je pomembno predvsem, da bi se potrošnik zaradi pozitivnih asociacij, povezanih s podobo prejšnje znamke, nagibal k nakupu teh pijač v pričakovanju enakih lastnosti, kot je povečanje libida (točke od 52 do 67).
EMILIO PUCCI 27/09/2012, T373/09, Emidio Tucci, EU:T:2012:500 (18/06/2009, R 770/20082 & R 826/20082, EMIDIO TUCCI (fig.) / EMILIO PUCCI (fig.))
EMILIO PUCCI 27/09/2012, T373/09, Emidio Tucci, EU:T:2012:500 (18/06/2009, R 770/20082 in R 826/20082, EMIDIO TUCCI (fig.) / EMILIO PUCCI (fig.))
Although the applicant's cosmetic products are dissimilar to the opponent's clothes, they both fall squarely within the realm of products that are often sold as luxury items under famous marks of well-known designers and manufacturers.
Čeprav prijaviteljevi kozmetični proizvodi niso enaki oblačilom vložnika ugovora, oboje nedvomno spada med proizvode, ki se pogosto prodajajo kot luksuzni proizvodi pod slavnimi znamkami znanih oblikovalcev in proizvajalcev.
Taking into account that the earlier mark is very well known and that the commercial contexts in which the goods are promoted are relatively close, BoA concluded that consumers of luxury clothes will make a connection between the applicant's mark for soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics and hair lotions in Class 3 and the famous mark ‘EMILIO PUCCI', an association that will produce a commercial benefit as per the Board's findings (BoA para. 129).
Glede na to, da je prejšnja znamka zelo znana in da sta si tržna sektorja, v katerih se blago promovira, sorazmerno blizu, je odbor za pritožbe ugotovil, da bodo potrošniki luksuznih oblačil povezali prijaviteljevo znamko za mila, parfume, eterična olja, kozmetične proizvode in losjone za lase iz razreda 3 ter slavno znamko „EMILIO PUCCI“, kar je po ugotovitvah odbora asociacija, ki bo omogočila komercialno korist (odbor za pritožbe, točka 129).
BoA concluded that there was a strong likelihood that the applicant could exploit the reputation of the opponent's mark for its own benefit.
Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil, da bi lahko prijavitelj zelo verjetno izkoristil ugled znamke vložnika ugovora.
The use of the mark applied for in connection with the goods and services mentioned above will almost certainly draw the relevant consumer's attention to the opponent's highly similar and very well-known mark.
Uporaba znamke, za katero je vložena prijava v zvezi z navedenim blagom in storitvami, bo upoštevne potrošnike skoraj gotovo spomnila na zelo podobno in znano znamko vložnika ugovora.
The applicant will become associated with the aura of luxury that surrounds the ‘EMILIO PUCCI' brand.
Prijavitelj bo postal povezan z luksuznim pridihom, ki obkroža znamko „EMILIO PUCCI“.
Many consumers are likely to think that there is a direct connection between the applicant's goods on the one hand, and the famous Italian fashion house on the other, perhaps in the form of a licensing agreement.
Številni potrošniki bi lahko mislili, da je med prijaviteljevim blagom in slavno italijansko modno hišo neposredna zveza, kot je na primer licenčna pogodba.
The applicant could take unfair advantage of the fact that the public knows the trade mark ‘EMILIO PUCCI' well in order to introduce its own highly similar trade mark without incurring any great risk or the costs of introducing a totally unknown trade mark onto the market (BoA para. 130).
Prijavitelj bi lahko dejstvo, da javnost dobro pozna znamko „EMILIO PUCCI“, neupravičeno izkoristil za predstavitev svoje zelo podobne znamke brez kakršnega koli večjega tveganja ali stroškov dajanja popolnoma neznane znamke na trg (odbor za pritožbe, točka 130).
The General Court confirmed the BoA findings.
Splošno sodišče je potrdilo ugotovitve odbora za pritožbe.
The Board of Appeal found that (1) the marks have very limited similarities and are dissimilar overall; (2) use of the common designation ‘O2' is descriptive in the mark applied for; and (3) given the completely different areas of use - and the descriptive use of the common element - there can be no possibility of the applicant benefiting from the distinctive character of the earlier mark, even if there may be an overlap in the relevant public (para. 55).
Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil, da (1) je med znamkama zelo malo podobnosti in sta v celoti različni; da (2) je pri znamki, za katero je vložena prijava, uporaba skupne oznake „O2“ opisna, in da (3) prijavitelj glede na popolnoma različni področji uporabe - in opisno uporabo skupnega elementa - nikakor ne more izkoristiti razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, tudi če bi se upoštevna javnost prekrivala (točka 55).
The earlier mark Vips has a reputation for restaurants, in particular fast-food chains.
Prejšnja znamka Vips ima ugled v zvezi z restavracijami, zlasti verigami restavracij s hitro hrano.
However, it was not proven that it also enjoys any particular prestige.
Vendar ni bilo dokazano, da ima tudi poseben prestiž.
The term Vips is laudatory in itself and extensively used in this manner.
Izraz Vips je sam po sebi poveličevalen in se v tem smislu zelo pogosto uporablja.
There is no explanation as to how the sales of software products under the mark Vips could possibly benefit from their association with a fast-food chain, even if a link were made.
Ni bilo pojasnjeno, kako bi lahko prodaja programske opreme pod znamko Vips izkoristila asociacijo na verigo restavracij s hitro hrano, tudi če bi ta zveza obstajala.
Therefore, the Court rules out the risk that use of the mark applied for would take unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark.
Zato je Sodišče odločilo, da ne obstaja tveganje, da bi znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, neupravičeno izkoriščala razlikovalni značaj ali ugled prejšnje znamke.
Spa has a reputation for mineral water in the Benelux.
Znamka Spa ima ugled v zvezi z mineralno vodo v Beneluksu.
The contested mark, Spa-Finders, covers publications, catalogues, magazines, newsletters, travel agency services.
Sporna znamka Spa-Finders označuje publikacije, kataloge, revije, glasila, storitve potovalnih agencij.
The General Court declared that there was no detrimental link between the signs.
Splošno sodišče je ugotovilo, da med znakoma ni škodljive zveze.
The sign Spa is also used to denote the town of Spa and the racing circuit of the same name.
Znak Spa označuje tudi mesto Spa in istoimensko dirkališče.
There is no evidence of unfair advantage or any kind of exploitation of the fame of the earlier mark.
Nobenega dokaza ni o neupravičenem izkoriščanju ali kakršnem koli izkoriščanju slave prejšnje znamke.
The word Spa in the mark applied for only denotes the kind of publication concerned.
Beseda Spa v znamki, za katero je vložena prijava, označuje samo zadevno vrsto publikacije.
The earlier mark ‘TDK' has a reputation within the European Union for ‘audio and videotape goods'.
Prejšnja znamka „TDK“ uživa ugled v Evropski uniji v zvezi z avdio- in videotrakovi.
The opponent argued that ‘[b]uilding and construction is a specific commercial area in which use of a TDK could diminish a reputation of the sort and nature of a company such as the opponent'.
Vložnik ugovora je trdil, da sta gradbeništvo in konstrukcija posebno gospodarsko področje, na katerem bi uporaba kratice TDK lahko zmanjšala ugled podjetja, kakršno je vložnikovo.
The Board found that this argument, which seems to be a mixture of allegations that there is detriment to the reputation and detriment to the distinctive character of the earlier mark, is no more than a mere statement, which is not corroborated by any evidence that would demonstrate prima facie a serious risk of change in economic behaviour or of a reduction in the trade mark's power of attraction.
Odbor je ugotovil, da ta utemeljitev, za katero se zdi, da je kombinacija trditve, da gre za oškodovanje ugleda in oškodovanje razlikovalnega značaja prejšnje znamke, ni nič več kot samo izjava, ki ni podprta z dokazi, ki bi na prvi pogled kazali resno tveganje spremembe ekonomskega ravnanja ali zmanjšanja privlačnosti blagovne znamke.
Reputed for tobacco products Foodstuffs in Classes 29, 30 and 32
Ugled v zvezi s tobačnimi izdelki Živila iz razredov 29, 30 in 32
First of all, taking into account the very high similarity between the conflicting marks and the high reputation of the earlier mark, there is a risk that the public will be led to believe that the CAMEL food products originate from, or that the mark is used with the consent of, the opponent.
Prvič, ob upoštevanju zelo velike podobnosti med spornima znamkama in velikega ugleda prejšnje znamke obstaja tveganje, da bo javnost mislila, da živila CAMEL izvirajo od vložnika ugovora ali da se znamka uporablja z njegovim soglasjem.
Moreover, the capacity of the reputed CAMEL mark to arouse immediate association with the opponent's business will be diminished by the use of the contested mark.
Poleg tega se bo z uporabo sporne znamke zmanjšala sposobnost znamke CAMEL z ugledom, da izzove takojšnje miselne povezave s podjetjem vložnika ugovora.
The use of a highly similar mark for food products would be detrimental to the distinctive character of the reputed CAMEL trade mark for tobacco products, making this mark ordinary, which is in essence a diminution of the power of attraction of the mark.
Uporaba zelo podobne znamke za živila bi oškodovala razlikovalni značaj blagovne znamke CAMEL z ugledom v zvezi s tobačnimi izdelki, zaradi česar bi ta znamka postala običajna, kar v bistvu pomeni zmanjšanje privlačnosti znamke.
This will lead to dispersion of the identity and hold upon the public's mind of the earlier mark.
To bo povzročilo razpršitev identitete in vplivalo na mišljenje javnosti glede prejšnje znamke.
The earlier mark, used to arouse immediate association with the goods for which it is registered, will no longer be capable of doing so.
Prejšnja znamka, ki se je uporabljala za vzbuditev takojšnje miselne povezave z blagom, za katerega je registrirana, tega ne bo mogla več storiti.
It follows that there is a clear probability of damage to the earlier mark's advertising function as a vehicle for building up and retaining brand loyalty, and that the economic value of the earlier reputed mark will be impaired, in the medium or long term, as a consequence of the use of the contested mark, in the sense that consumers of the goods for which the reputed mark is protected and known will be less inclined to associate it immediately with the undertaking that has built up the trade mark's reputation; this must be considered a change in their economic behaviour (para. 41).
Iz tega sledi, da obstaja jasna verjetnost oškodovanja funkcije oglaševanja prejšnje znamke kot sredstva za razvoj in ohranjanje zvestobe znamki ter da se bo tržna vrednost prejšnje znamke z ugledom srednjeročno ali dolgoročno zmanjšala zaradi uporabe izpodbijane znamke v smislu, da bodo potrošniki blaga, za katero je znamka z ugledom zaščitena, manj sposobni znamko neposredno povezati s podjetjem, ki je zgradilo ugled blagovne znamke; to se mora šteti za spremembo njihovega ekonomskega ravnanja (točka 41).
Reputed for fast food restaurant chain in Class 42 Computer programming for hotel services in Class 42
Ugled v zvezi z verigami restavracij s hitro hrano iz razreda 43 Računalniško programiranje za hotelirske storitve iz razreda 42
‘So far as concerns, first, detriment to the distinctive character of the earlier mark by the use without due cause of the mark applied for, that detriment can occur where the earlier mark is no longer capable of arousing immediate association with the goods for which it is registered and used (SPA-FINDERS, paragraph 34 above, paragraph 43).
„Najprej je treba v zvezi z oškodovanjem razločevalnega učinka prejšnje znamke, ki naj bi ga povzročila neupravičena uporaba prijavljene znamke, navesti, da tako oškodovanje nastane, če prejšnja znamka ni več sposobna izzvati takojšnje miselne povezave s proizvodi, za katere je registrirana in za katere se uporablja (zgoraj v točki 34 navedena sodba SPA-FINDERS, točka 43).
That risk thus refers to the “dilution” or “gradual whittling away” of the earlier mark through the dispersion of its identity and its hold upon the public mind (Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Adidas-Salomon and Adidas-Benelux, paragraph 36 above, point 37)' (para. 37).
To tveganje se nanaša na ‚oslabitev‘ ali ‚postopno obvladovanje‘ prejšnje znamke, razpršitev njene istovetnosti in vpliva na mišljenje javnosti (sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa k zgoraj v točki [36] navedeni sodbi Adidas-Salomon in Adidas Benelux, točka 37)“ (točka 37).
‘As far as concerns, first, the risk that the use of the mark applied for would be detrimental to the distinctive character of the earlier mark, in other words the risk of “dilution” and “gradual whittling away” of that mark, as explained in paragraphs 37 and 38 above, it must be pointed out that the term “VIPS” is the plural form, in English, of the abbreviation VIP (“Very Important Person”), which is widely and frequently used both internationally and nationally to describe famous personalities.
„Prvič, v zvezi s tveganjem, da bi bil z uporabo prijavljene znamke oškodovan razlikovalni učinek prejšnje znamke, oziroma v zvezi s tveganjem ‚oslabitve‘ in ‚postopnega obvladovanja‘ te znamke, kot je bilo prikazano zgoraj v točkah 37 in 38, je treba navesti, da je beseda ‚VIPS‘ v angleškem jeziku v množini kratica VIP (v angleščini ‚Very Important Person‘, torej ‚zelo pomembna oseba‘), ki se zelo veliko in pogosto uporablja na mednarodni in nacionalni ravni in označuje znane osebnosti.
In those circumstances, the risk that the use of the mark applied for would be detrimental to the distinctive character of the earlier mark is limited' (para. 62).
V teh okoliščinah kaže, da je tveganje oškodovanja razlikovalnega učinka prejšnje znamke z uporabo prijavljene znamke omejeno“ (točka 62).
‘That same risk is also even less probable in the present case as the mark applied for covers the services “Computer programming relating to hotel services, restaurants, cafés”, which are directed at a special and necessarily more limited public, namely the owners of those establishments.
„Prav to tveganje se zdi v tem primeru manj verjetno, saj se prijavljena znamka nanaša na storitve ‚programiranja računalnikov za hotele, restavracije (obroki), kavarniške bifeje‘, ki so namenjeni posebni in nujno veliko bolj omejeni javnosti, in sicer lastnikom navedenih obratov.
The consequence is that the mark applied for, if registration is allowed, will probably be known, through use, only by that relatively limited public, a factor that certainly reduces the risk of dilution or gradual whittling away of the earlier mark through the dispersion of its identity and its hold upon the public mind' (para. 63).
Posledica tega je, da prijavljena znamka, če se dovoli njena registracija, verjetno ne bo znana z uporabo drugje kot pri tej razmeroma omejeni javnosti, kar gotovo zmanjša tveganje oslabitve ali postopnega obvladovanja prejšnje znamke preko razpršitve njene istovetnosti in vpliva na mišljenje javnosti“ (točka 63).
Reputed for mineral waters in Class 32 Printed publications including catalogues, magazines, newsletters in Class 16, Travel agency in Class 39
Ugled v zvezi z mineralno vodo iz razreda 32 Tiskane publikacije, vključno s katalogi, revijami in glasili iz razreda 16, potovalne agencije iz razreda 39
‘In the present case, the Court finds that the applicant does not put forward any evidence to support the conclusion that there is a risk of detriment to the distinctive character of the mark SPA by the use of the mark SPA-FINDERS.
„V tem primeru Sodišče prve stopnje ugotavlja, da tožeča stranka ne navaja nobenih dejstev, ki bi omogočala sklepanje, da obstaja verjetnost oškodovanja razlikovalnega značaja znamke SPA z uporabo znamke SPA‑FINDERS.
The applicant stresses the alleged immediate link that the public will establish between SPA and SPA-FINDERS.
Tožeča stranka namreč vztraja, da naj bi javnost znamki SPA in SPA‑FINDERS takoj miselno povezovala.
It infers from that link that there is detriment to the distinctive character.
Iz te vezi tožeča stranka sklepa o oškodovanju razlikovalnega značaja.
As the applicant acknowledged at the hearing, the existence of such a link is not sufficient to demonstrate the risk of detriment to the distinctive character.
Kot je tožeča stranka na obravnavi priznala, obstoj take vezi ne zadošča za dokaz verjetnosti oškodovanja razlikovalnega značaja.
The Court notes, moreover, that since the term “spa” is frequently used to designate, for example, the Belgian town of Spa and the Belgian racing circuit of Spa-Francorchamps or, in general, places for hydrotherapy such as hammams or saunas, the risk of detriment to the distinctive character of the mark SPA seems to be limited' (para. 44).
Ker se po mnenju Sodišča prve stopnje izraz ‚Spa‘ pogosto uporablja za določitev, na primer belgijskega mesta Spa in belgijskega avtomobilskega dirkališča Spa-Francorchamps, oziroma splošno za prostore, namenjene hidroterapiji, kot so turške kopeli in savne, je verjetnost oškodovanja razlikovalnega značaja znamke SPA majhna“ (točka 44).
Reputed for machine tools in Class 7 Machines for professional and industrial processing of wood and green waste; professional and industrial wood chippers and shredders in Class 7
Ugled v zvezi z orodnimi stroji iz razreda 7 Stroji za profesionalno in industrijsko obdelavo lesa in rastlinskih odpadkov; profesionalni in industrijski sekalniki in drobilniki lesa iz razreda 7