natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PARIS BoA established that ‘PARIS' is likely to be associated with a certain idea of quality, design, stylishness and even of being avant-garde.
PARIS Odbor za pritožbe je ugotovil, da bi se „PARIS“ verjetno povezoval z določeno predstavo o kakovosti, oblikovanju, eleganci in celo avantgardnostjo.
This results in a positive feeling, an expectation with regard to the quality of the goods sold and the services provided, when ‘PARIS' is put forward as an indication of geographical origin or destination.
Posledica je pozitiven občutek, pričakovanje glede kakovosti prodajanega blaga in opravljanih storitev, če se „PARIS“ izpostavi kot označba geografskega izvora ali namembnega kraja.
CERAMIC WHITE Class 9 products (smartphones, PDAs, TV receivers, etc.)
CERAMIC WHITE Proizvodi iz razreda 9 (pametni telefoni, osebni digitalni asistenti, televizijski sprejemniki itd.)
OPAL BLUE for software in Class 9.
OPAL BLUE za programsko opremo iz razreda 9.
There is no link between an opal-blue colour and the computer application software applied for.
Med opalno modro barvo in računalniško programsko aplikacijo, za katero je bila vložena prijava, ni nobene povezave.
Computer software is a programme used to operate computers, which by its very nature is colourless.
Računalniška programska oprema je program, ki se uporablja za delovanje računalnikov in je brezbarven.
There is also no indication that colours are used to indicate specific types or versions or any other features of computer software and nothing was brought forward by the examiner in this respect.
Poleg tega nič ne kaže, da se barve uporabljajo za označbo posebnih vrst ali različic ali drugih lastnosti računalniške programske opreme, tudi preizkuševalec ni navedel ničesar.
Sign EUTM No
Znak Blagovna znamka EU št.
DIARIO DE LAS PROVINCIAS DE VALENCIA Classes 16, 35 EUTM 54 619
DIARIO DE LAS PROVINCIAS DE VALENCIA Razreda 16 in 35 Blagovna znamka EU št.
The expression ‘alicante-airport' immediately informs consumers without further reflection that the services applied for are from an airport in the city or province of Alicante.
Izraz „alicante-airport“ potrošnike brez dodatnega razmišljanja takoj seznani s tem, da so storitve, za katere je vložena prijava, letališke storitve v mestu ali pokrajini Alicante.
Class 5, 25 and 35 29/09/2016, T335/15, DEVICE OF A BODY BUILDER (fig.), EU:T:2016:579
Razredi 5, 25 in 35 29/09/2016, T335/15, DEVICE OF A BODY BUILDER (fig.), EU:T:2016:579
The application was rejected since ‘Hijoputa' is an offensive and vulgar word in Spanish.
Prijava je bila zavrnjena, ker je „Hijoputa“ v španščini žaljiva in vulgarna beseda.
The application was considered to be against accepted principles of morality (irrespectively of the figurative elements of the sign) protected under Article 7(1)(f) EUTMR.
Štelo se je, da je prijava v nasprotju s sprejetimi moralnimi načeli (ne glede na figurativne elemente znaka), kot določa člen 7(1)(f) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Sign EUTM No Goods and services
Znak Blagovna znamka EU št.
The distinctive figurative elements of the sign are irrelevant.
Figurativni elementi znaka z razlikovalnim učinkom niso pomembni.
Sign Example
Znak Primer
CP3 example
Primer CP3
Sign Case No Goods and services
Znak Št. zadeve Blago in storitve
07/05/2008 R 655/20071 Classes 1,3,7,17,22,37
07/05/2008 R 655/20071 Razredi 1, 3, 7, 17, 22 in 37
T464/08 EU:T:2010:212 Classes 12,18,25
T464/08 EU:T:2010:212 Razredi 12, 18, 25
CP3 examples
Primeri CP3
04/12/2014, T494/13 EU:T:2014:1022 Classes 35,39,42
04/12/2014, T494/13 EU:T:2014:1022 Razredi 35, 39 in 42
20/11/2015, T202/15 EU:T:2015:914 Classes 9, 28, 41
20/11/2015, T202/15 EU:T:2015:914 Razredi 9, 28 in 41
T91/01 Classes 9,38,42
05/12/2002, T91/01 Razredi 9, 38 in 42
01/02/2016, R 1451/20154 Classes 3,4,14,16,18,20,21,25,30,32,33
01/02/2016, R 1451/20154 Razredi 3, 4, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 30, 32 in 33
12/11/2014, T504/12, EU:T:2014:941 Classes 3, 5
12/11/2014, T504/12, EU:T:2014:941 Razreda 3 in 5
11/07/2012, T559/10 EU:T:2012:362 Class 3
11/07/2012, T559/10 EU:T:2012:362 Razred 3
09/07/2014, T520/12 EU:T:2014:620 Class 30
09/07/2014, T520/12 EU:T:2014:620 Razred 30
21/05/2015, T203/14, EU:T:2015:301 Classes 18, 25
21/05/2015, T203/14, EU:T:2015:301 Razreda 18 in 25
11/02/2015, R 1983/20142 Class 11
11/02/2015, R 1983/20142 Razred 11
03/07/2003, T122/01 EU:T:2003:183 Classes 35, 37, 42
03/07/2003, T122/01 EU:T:2003:183 Razredi 35, 37 in 42
11/12/2015, R 1191/20155 Classes 16, 29, 30, 35
11/12/2015, R 1191/20155 Razredi 16, 29, 30 in 35
03/12/2015, T647/14 EU:T:2015:932 Classes 7, 8, 35
03/12/2015, T647/14 EU:T:2015:932 Razredi 7, 8 in 35
24/06/2015, T552/14 EU:T:2015:462 Classes 3, 21, 30
24/06/2015, T552/14 EU:T:2015:462 Razredi 3, 21 in 30
Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part B, Examination Page 2
Smernice za preizkušanje v Uradu, del B, Preizkušanje Stran 1
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - Customary Signs or Indications
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Običajni znaki ali označbe
CHAPTER 5
POGLAVJE 5
Customary signs or indications
Običajni znaki ali označbe
Table of Contents
2 Trenutek, ko izraz postane običajen 3
1 General Remarks
3 Presoja običajnih izrazov 4
In this context, the customary nature of the sign usually refers to something other than the properties or characteristics of the goods or services themselves.
V zvezi s tem se običajna narava znaka navadno nanaša na nekaj drugega, kot so lastnosti ali značilnosti samega blaga ali storitev.
Although there is a clear overlap between the scope of Article 7(1)(d) and Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR, signs covered by Article 7(1)(d) EUTMR are excluded from registration not because they are descriptive, but on the basis of their current usage in trade sectors covering the goods or services for which the mark is applied for (04/10/2001, C517/99, Bravo, EU:C:2001:510, § 35).
Čeprav se področji uporabe člena 7(1)(d) in (c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU jasno prekrivata, znaki iz člena 7(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU niso izključeni iz registracije zaradi tega, ker so opisni, ampak na podlagi njihove trenutne uporabe v trgovinskih sektorjih, ki zajemajo blago in storitve, za katere je prijavljena znamka (04/10/2001, C517/99, Bravo, EU:C:2001:510, § 35).
Moreover, signs or indications that have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade to designate the goods or services covered by that sign are not capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings and do not, therefore, fulfil the essential function of a trade mark (16/03/2006, T322/03, Weisse Seiten, EU:T:2006:87, § 52).
Znaki ali označbe, ki sestavljajo znamko in so postali običajni v jezikovni rabi ali v dobroverni ustaljeni praksi trgovanja za označevanje blaga ali storitev te znamke, niso ustrezni za razlikovanje blaga ali storitev podjetja od tistih drugih podjetij, zato ne izpolnjujejo glavne naloge omenjene blagovne znamke (16/03/2006, T322/03, Weisse Seiten, EU:T:2006:87, § 52).
It also covers certain abbreviations that have entered informal or jargon usage and have thereby become customary in trade.
Vključuje tudi nekatere okrajšave, ki so se začele uporabljati v neformalnem jeziku ali žargonu in so zato postale običajne v trgovini.
Furthermore, a refusal based on Article 7(1)(d) EUTMR also covers figurative elements that are either frequently used pictograms or similar indications or have even become the standard designation for goods and services for which registration is sought, for example a white ‘P' on a blue background for parking places, the Aesculapian staff for pharmacies, or the silhouette of a knife and fork for restaurant services.
Zavrnitev na podlagi člena 7(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zajema tudi figurativne elemente, ki so pogosto uporabljeni piktogrami ali podobne označbe ali so postali standardna oznaka za blago in storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija, na primer bela črka „P“ na modrem ozadju za parkirišča, Eskulapova palica za lekarne ali obris noža in vilice za storitve restavracij.
2 Point in Time of a Term Becoming Customary
Trenutek, ko izraz postane običajen
The customary character must be assessed with reference to the filing date of the EUTM application (05/03/2003, T237/01, BSS, EU:T:2003:54, § 46; 05/10/2004, C192/03 P, BSS, EU:C:2004:587, § 39-40).
Običajno naravo je treba oceniti glede na datum vložitve prijave blagovne znamke EU (05/03/2003, T237/01, BSS, EU:T:2003:54, § 46; in 05/10/2004, C192/03 P, BSS, EU:C:2004:587, § 39-40).
Whether a term or figurative element was non-descriptive or distinctive long before that date, or when the term was first adopted, will in most cases be immaterial, since it does not necessarily prove that the sign in question had not become customary by the filing date (05/03/2003, T237/01, BSS, EU:T:2003:54, § 47; similarly, 21/05/2014, T553/12, BATEAUX MOUCHES, EU:T:2014:264).
Ali je bil izraz ali figurativni element neopisen ali razlikovalen že dolgo pred tem datumom ali ko je bil izraz prvič sprejet, v večini primerov ni bistveno, ker ne dokazuje nujno, da zadevni znak ni postal običajen do datuma vložitve prijave (05/03/2003, T237/01, BSS, EU:T:2003:54, § 47; in podobno 21/05/2014, T553/12, BATEAUX MOUCHES, EU:T:2014:264).
In some cases, a sign applied for may become customary after the filing date.
V nekaterih primerih lahko znak, za katerega je bila vložena prijava, postane običajen po datumu vložitve prijave.
Changes in the meaning of a sign that lead to a sign becoming customary after the filing date do not lead to a declaration for invalidity ex tunc under Article 59(1)(a) EUTMR, but can lead to a revocation with effect ex nunc under Article 58(1)(b) EUTMR.
Spremembe v pomenu, zaradi katerih znak postane običajen po datumu vložitve prijave, ne povzročijo, da se registracija ugotovi za nično z učinkom za nazaj (ex tunc) na podlagi člena 59(1)(a) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, lahko pa povzročijo razveljavitev z učinkom za naprej (ex nunc) na podlagi člena 58(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For example, the EUTM registration ‘STIMULATION' was cancelled on the grounds that it had become a term customarily used for energy drinks.
Na primer, registracija blagovne znamke EU „STIMULATION“ je bila izbrisana z obrazložitvijo, da je to postal običajno uporabljen izraz za energijske napitke.
For further information, see the Guidelines, Part D, Cancellation, Section 2, Substantive Provisions.
Za več informacij glej Smernice, del D: Izbris, razdelek 2: Vsebinske določbe.
3 Assessment of Customary Terms
Presoja običajnih izrazov
Whether a mark is customary must be assessed, firstly, by reference to the goods or services for which registration is sought, and, secondly, on the basis of the target public's perception of the mark (07/06/2011, T507/08, 16PF, EU:T:2011:253, § 53).
Običajnost znamke je treba presojati po eni strani glede na blago ali storitve, za katere se zahteva registracija, in po drugi strani glede na to, kako znamko zaznava upoštevna javnost (07/06/2011, T507/08, 16PF, EU:T:2011:253, § 53).
As regards the link with the goods and services for which registration is sought, Article 7(1)(d) EUTMR will not apply where the mark is a more general laudatory term that has no particular customary link with the goods and services concerned (04/10/2001, C517/99, Bravo, EU:C:2001:510, § 27, 31).
Glede povezave z blagom in storitvami, za katere se zahteva registracija, se člen 7(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne uporablja, kadar je znamka splošnejši poveličevalni izraz, ki nima posebne povezave z običajnostjo zadevnega blaga in storitev (04/10/2001, C517/99, Bravo, EU:C:2001:510, § 27, 31).
As regards the relevant public, the customary character must be assessed by taking account of the expectations that the average consumer, who is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect, is presumed to have in respect of the type of goods in question (16/03/2006, T322/03, Weisse Seiten, EU:T:2006:87, § 50).
Glede upoštevne javnosti, je treba običajno naravo presojati ob upoštevanju domnevnega pričakovanja povprečnega potrošnika, za katerega se domneva, da je normalno obveščen in primerno pozoren in preudaren glede vrste zadevnega blaga (16/03/2006, T322/03, Weisse Seiten, EU:T:2006:87, § 50).
The Court has clarified a number of issues in this respect.
Sodišče je v zvezi s tem pojasnilo številna vprašanja.
The relevant public to be taken into account in determining the sign's customary character comprises not only all consumers and end users but also, depending on the features of the market concerned, all those in the trade who deal with that product commercially (29/04/2004, C371/02, Bostongurka, EU:C:2004:275, § 26; 06/03/2014, C409/12, Kornspitz, EU:C:2014:130, § 27).
Upoštevna javnost, katere mnenje je treba upoštevati pri presoji vprašanja običajne narave znaka, ne pomeni samo vseh potrošnikov ali končnih kupcev, ampak tudi, glede na značilnosti trga za zadevni proizvod, vse osebe, ki poklicno sodelujejo pri njegovi prodaji (29/04/2004, C371/02, Bostongurka, EU:C:2004:275, § 26 in 06/03/2014, C409/12, Kornspitz, EU:C:2014:130, § 27).
Where the trade mark targets both professionals and non-professionals (such as intermediaries and end users), it is sufficient for a sign to be refused or revoked if it is perceived to be a usual designation by any one sector of the relevant public, notwithstanding that another sector may recognise the sign as a badge of origin (06/03/2014, C409/12, Kornspitz, EU:C:2014:130, § 23-26).
Kadar so cilj blagovne znamke poklicni in nepoklicni uporabniki (kot so posredniki in končni uporabniki), za zavrnitev ali razveljavitev znaka zadostuje, da ga kateri koli sektor upoštevne javnosti dojema kot običajno oznako, ne glede na to, da lahko drug sektor dojema znak kot označbo izvora (06/03/2014, C409/12, Kornspitz, EU:C:2014:130, § 23-26).
The General Court has held that Article 7(1)(d) EUTMR is not applicable when the sign's use in the market is by one sole trader (other than the EUTM applicant) (07/06/2011, T507/08, 16PF, EU:T:2011:253).
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da se člen 7(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne uporablja, kadar znak na trgu uporablja samo en trgovec (ki ni prijavitelj blagovne znamke EU) (07/06/2011, T507/08, 16PF, EU:T:2011:253).
In other words, a mark will not be regarded as customary purely for the simple reason that a competitor of the EUTM applicant also uses the sign in question.
Z drugimi besedami, znak se ne šteje za običajnega samo iz preprostega razloga, da tudi konkurent prijavitelja blagovne znamke EU uporablja zadevni znak.
Sign Reasoning Case No
Blagovna znamka EU št.
EUTM No 9 894 528 covering goods in Class 9 ‘This device is identical to the international safety symbol known as “high voltage symbol” or “caution, risk of electric shock” ...
9 894 528 za blago iz razreda 9 Zadevni znak je enak mednarodnemu varnostnemu simbolu „Visoka napetost“ ali „Pozor, nevarnost električnega udara!“.
It has been officially defined as such by the ISO 3864 as the standard high voltage symbol, whereby the device applied for is contained within the triangle which denotes that it is a hazard symbol ...
Kot tak je bil na podlagi standarda ISO 3864 uradno opredeljen kot standardni simbol za visoko napetost, pri katerem je zadevni znak prikazan v trikotniku, ki pomeni simbol za nevarnost.
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - Shapes or Other Characteristics with an Essentially Technical Function, Substantial Value or Resulting from the Nature of the Goods
Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev - Oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki so nujne za dosego tehničnega učinka, dajejo bistveno vrednost ali izhajajo iz narave blaga
CHAPTER 6
POGLAVJE 6
SHAPES OR OTHER CHARACTERISTICS WITH AN ESSENTIALLY TECHNICAL FUNCTION, SUBSTANTIAL VALUE OR RESULTING FROM THE NATURE OF THE GOODS
OBLIKE ALI DRUGE ZNAČILNOSTI, KI SO NUJNE ZA DOSEGO TEHNIČNEGA UČINKA, DAJO BISTVENO VREDNOST ALI IZHAJAJO IZ NARAVE BLAGA
(ARTICLE 7(1)(e) EUTMR)
(ČLEN 7(1)(e) UREDBE O BLAGOVNI ZNAMKI EU)
1 General Remarks
Splošne pripombe
Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR excludes from registration signs that consist exclusively of (i) the shape or another characteristic that results from the nature of the goods themselves; (ii) the shape or another characteristic of goods that is necessary to obtain a technical result; or (iii) the shape or another characteristic of the goods that gives substantial value to the goods.
Člen 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU izključuje iz registracije znake, sestavljene izključno iz (i) oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki izhaja iz narave blaga, (ii) oblike ali druge značilnosti blaga, ki je nujna za doseg tehničnega učinka, ali (iii) oblike ali druge značilnosti blaga, ki daje blagu bistveno vrednost.
The wording of this provision implies, in principle, that it does not apply to signs for which registration is sought in respect of services.
Besedilo te določbe načeloma pomeni, da se ne uporablja za znake, ki jih je treba registrirati v zvezi s storitvami.
In relation to shapes, the objective pursued by Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR is the same for all of its three grounds, namely to prevent the exclusive and permanent rights that a trade mark confers from serving to extend the life of other IP rights indefinitely, such as patents or designs, which the EU legislature has sought to make subject to limited periods (18/09/2014, C205/13, Hauck, EU:C:2014:2233, § 19-20; 14/09/2010, C48/09 P, Lego brick, EU:C:2010:516, § 43; 06/10/2011, T508/08, Loudspeaker, EU:T:2011:575, § 65).
Cilj člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU v zvezi z oblikami je enak za vse njegove tri podlage, tj. preprečiti, da bi se izključne in trajne pravice iz blagovne znamke lahko uporabile za časovno neomejeno podaljšanje trajanja drugih pravic intelektualne lastnine, kot so patenti ali modeli, za katere je zakonodaja EU določila omejen rok (18/09/2014, C205/13, Hauck, EU:C:2014:2233, § 19-20; 14/09/2010, C48/09 P, Lego brick, EU:C:2010:516, § 43; 06/10/2011, T508/08, Loudspeaker, EU:T:2011:575, § 65).
Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Community Trade Mark Regulation introduced the reference to ‘another characteristic' of goods.
Uredba (EU) 2015/2424 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe o blagovni znamki Skupnosti je uvedla sklicevanje na druge značilnosti blaga.
To the Office's understanding, most of the trade marks that fall foul of the new wording of this provision are currently objectionable under Article 7(1)(b) and/or (c) EUTMR, as they are descriptive or otherwise non-distinctive.
Urad domneva, da je trenutno zoper večino blagovnih znamk, ki so v nasprotju z novim besedilom te določbe, mogoče vložiti ugovor na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) in/ali (c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, saj so opisne ali kako drugače nerazlikovalne.
However, an important practical difference lies in the fact that an objection under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR cannot be overcome by invoking Article 7(3) EUTMR.
Pomembna praktična razlika pa je v tem, da ugovora na podlagi člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni mogoče rešiti s sklicevanjem na člen 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Importantly, unlike the situation covered by Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR, the average consumer's perception is not a decisive element when applying the ground for refusal under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR, but, at most, may be a relevant criterion for the Office when identifying the sign's essential characteristics (18/09/2014, C205/13, Hauck, EU:C:2014:2233, § 34).
Še zlasti je treba poudariti, da v nasprotju s primerom iz člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU dojemanje povprečnega potrošnika ni odločilni element pri uporabi razloga za zavrnitev na podlagi člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, temveč je lahko največ element presoje, ki je za Urad koristen pri opredelitvi bistvenih značilnosti znaka (18/09/2014, C205/13, Hauck, EU:C:2014:2233, § 34).
For these reasons, an objection under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR to marks consisting of shapes or other characteristics that follow from the nature of the goods; shapes or other characteristics that are necessary to obtain a technical result; or shapes or other characteristics giving substantial value to the goods cannot be overcome by demonstrating that they have acquired distinctive character.
Zato ugovora na podlagi člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU zoper znamke, ki jih sestavljajo oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki izhajajo iz narave blaga, oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki so nujne za dosego tehničnega učinka, ali oblike ali druge značilnosti, ki blagu dajo bistveno vrednost, ni mogoče rešiti z dokazi o pridobljenem razlikovalnem značaju.
In other words, Article 7(3) EUTMR is not applicable to such shapes or other characteristics, regardless of whether that particular shape or another characteristic might actually be distinctive in the marketplace.
Člen 7(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU se torej ne uporablja za take oblike ali druge značilnosti, ne glede na to, ali bi navedena zadevna oblika ali druga značilnost dejansko lahko bila razlikovalna na trgu.
It is therefore essential to undertake a prior examination of the sign under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR where several of the absolute grounds for refusal provided for in Article 7(1) EUTMR may apply (06/10/2011, T508/08, Loudspeaker, EU:T:2011:575, § 44).
Zato je bistveno, da se opravi predhodno preizkušanje znaka na podlagi člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, pri čemer se lahko uporabi več absolutnih razlogov za zavrnitev, določenih v členu 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (06/10/2011, T508/08, Loudspeaker, EU:T:2011:575, § 44).
For the sake of sound administration and economy of proceedings, the Office will raise any objections to registration of the sign under Article 7(1) EUTMR simultaneously in one communication.
Urad zaradi dobrega upravljanja in ekonomičnosti postopkov vloži kakršne koli ugovore zoper registracijo znaka v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU hkrati v enem sporočilu.
The reasoning of the objection will address first Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR, even if this ground for refusal may be less evident than, for instance, an objection for a lack of distinctiveness under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR.
Obrazložitev ugovora bo najprej vključevala sklicevanje na člen 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, tudi če je ta razlog za zavrnitev morda manj očiten kot na primer pri ugovoru zaradi premajhnega razlikovalnega učinka na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
This is justified by the fact that registration of a sign that falls foul of Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR is clearly impossible even if acquired distinctiveness through use has been proven.
Dejstvo je, da znaka, ki je v nasprotju s členom 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ni mogoče registrirati, tudi če je bil dokazan njegov razlikovalen učinek, pridobljen z uporabo.
It may also be the case that, following an initial objection under Article 7(1)(b) and/or (c) EUTMR, the evidence submitted by the applicant shows that the sign consists exclusively of a shape or another characteristic as listed in Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR.
Mogoče je tudi, da po prvotnem ugovoru na podlagi člena 7(1)(b) in/ali (c) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU prijavitelj predloži dokazila o tem, da je znak sestavljen izključno iz oblike ali druge značilnosti, navedene v členu 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
In these cases, an objection under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR should be raised as well.
V teh primerih bi bilo treba vložiti ugovor tudi na podlagi člena 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR does not define the category of mark that must be considered as a shape within the meaning of that provision.
Vendar v členu 7(1)(e) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni opredeljena kategorija znamke, ki se mora šteti za obliko v smislu navedene določbe.
It makes no distinction between 2D or 3D shapes, or 2D representations of 3D shapes.
Razlika ni določena niti med dvo- ali tridimenzionalnimi oblikami niti dvodimenzionalnimi predstavitvami tridimenzionalnih oblik.