natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the opponent submits evidence of use in a language other than the language of the proceedings within the time limit established and then on its own initiative submits a translation of this evidence into the language of the proceedings after the expiry of the time limit but before the time limit set for the applicant to submit observations in reply has expired, this evidence will be taken into account.
Če vložnik ugovora v predpisanem roku predloži dokaz o uporabi v jeziku, ki ni jezik postopka, in nato na svojo pobudo predloži prevod tega dokaza v jeziku postopka po izteku roka, vendar pred iztekom roka, v katerem mora prijavitelj predložiti pripombe v odgovor, se bo ta dokaz upošteval.
This applies even if the Office has not required the opponent to file a translation and even if the applicant has not yet contested the evidence.
To velja tudi, če Urad od vložnika ugovora ni zahteval predložitve prevoda in če prijavitelj še ni izpodbijal dokazov.
For further information on proof of use, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use.
Za dodatne informacije o dokazu o uporabi glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi.
4.3.5 Change of language during opposition proceedings
Sprememba jezika med postopkom ugovora
Article 146(8) EUTMR
Člen 146(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
According to Article 146(5) EUTMR the opposition should be filed in one of the languages of the Office.
V skladu s členom 146(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU je treba ugovor vložiti v enem od jezikov Urada.
However, Article 146(8) EUTMR provides that the parties to opposition proceedings may agree to change the procedural language and choose any official language of the European Union for that purpose.
Vendar člen 146(8) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da se lahko stranki v postopku ugovora dogovorita o spremembi jezika postopka in v ta namen izbereta kateri koli uradni jezik Evropske unije.
If the parties agree to change the procedural language, they are required, pursuant to Article 3 EUTMDR, to inform the Office accordingly prior to the commencement of the adversarial part of the opposition proceedings.
Če se stranki dogovorita o spremembi jezika postopka, morata v skladu s členom 3 Delegirane uredbe Urad o tem ustrezno obvestiti pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka ugovora.
A request to change the language after the commencement of the adversarial part will not be accepted by the Office.
Urad po začetku kontradiktornega dela postopka ne bo sprejel zahteve za spremembo jezika.
According to Article 3 EUTMDR, when the opponent and the applicant agree to change the language of the proceedings before the start of the adversarial part of the proceedings, the applicant may request that the opponent files a translation of the notice of opposition in that language.
Če se vložnik ugovora in prijavitelj v skladu s členom 3 Delegirane uredbe dogovorita o spremembi jezika postopka pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka, lahko prijavitelj zahteva, da vložnik ugovora predloži prevod ugovora v navedenem jeziku.
In other words, the opponent only has to submit a translation of the notice of opposition if the applicant requests it.
Z drugimi besedami, vložnik ugovora mora prevod ugovora predložiti le, če ga zahteva prijavitelj.
The request for translation must be received before the start of the adversarial part of the proceedings.
Zahteva za prevod mora biti prejeta pred začetkom kontradiktornega dela postopka.
If the translation request is not filed or is filed late, the language of the proceedings will be changed to the language requested.
Če zahteva za prevod ni predložena ali je predložena prepozno, bo jezik postopka spremenjen v zahtevani jezik.
If a request to submit a translation of the notice of opposition has been filed and it was filed on time, the Office will set the opponent a time limit during which the translation must be submitted, which will be 1 month from expiry of the cooling-off period.
Če je bila zahteva za predložitev prevoda ugovora predložena in to pravočasno, bo Urad vložniku ugovora določil rok, v katerem mora predložiti prevod, in sicer v enem mesecu od izteka obdobja za pobotanje.
Where the translation is not filed or is filed late, the language of the proceedings will remain unchanged.
Če prevod ni predložen ali je predložen prepozno, bo jezik postopka ostal nespremenjen.
4.4 Requests and other documents related issues
Vprašanja v zvezi z zahtevami in drugimi dokumenti
4.4.1 Restrictions, withdrawals and requests for proof of use to be filed by way of a separate document
Omejitve, umiki in zahteve za dokaz o uporabi, ki jih je treba vložiti v ločenem dokumentu
Articles 8(8) and 10(1) EUTMDR
Člen 8(8) in člen 10(1) Delegirane uredbe
Where the applicant wishes to withdraw or restrict the contested application, it must do so by way of a separate document.
Če želi prijavitelj umakniti izpodbijano prijavo ali jo omejiti, mora to storiti v ločenem dokumentu.
The request must be separate from other submissions; therefore, although it may be filed simultaneously with other submissions, it must be presented separately (on a separate sheet).
Zahteva mora biti ločena od drugih vlog, zato jo je treba predložiti ločeno (na ločenem listu), čeprav jo je mogoče vložiti hkrati z drugimi vlogami.
Consequently, a request will never be accepted where it is merged into observations, even when it is included under a separate section, paragraph or header.
Zato zahteva ne bo nikoli sprejeta, če je vključena v pripombe, tudi če je vključena v ločen razdelek, odstavek ali naslov.
When the party submits such request electronically by selecting the specific options ‘submit a restriction of goods and services', ‘withdrawal', ‘submit a request for proof of use' or ‘submit observations and a request for proof of use', the automatic cover page in itself, as generated and as inserted in the file, will be considered as equivalent to a request in a ‘separate document'.
Če stranka takšno zahtevo predloži elektronsko z izbiro specifičnih možnosti „predloži omejitev blaga in storitev“, „umik“, „predloži zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi“ ali „predloži pripombe in zahtevo za dokaz o uporabi“, se bo samodejno narejena naslovnica, kot je ustvarjena in kot je vključena v spis, štela za enakovredno zahtevi glede ločenega dokumenta.
A request not filed electronically, even if identified as a request, is inadmissible because it is not submitted ‘separately' in the way defined above; the Office will refuse the request.
Zahteva, ki ni predložena elektronsko, tudi če je opredeljena kot zahteva, ni sprejemljiva, ker ni predložena ločeno, na zgoraj opredeljeni način, zato jo bo Urad zavrgel.
The refusal will confirm the reason for the rejection and will be an interim decision appealable together with the decision on the substance.
Zavrnitev, v kateri bo potrjen razlog za zavrnitev, bo začasna odločba, zoper katero se je mogoče pritožiti skupaj z meritorno odločbo.
For more details on requests for proof of use in Opposition Proceedings, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use.
Za dodatne informacije o zahtevah za dokaz o uporabi v postopku ugovora glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi.
4.4.2 Documents not readable
Neberljivi dokumenti
Article 63(3) EUTMDR
Člen 63(3) Delegirane uredbe
Where a communication received by electronic means, including fax, is incomplete or illegible, or where the Office has reasonable doubts as to the accuracy of the transmission, the Office will inform the sender accordingly and invite it, within a time limit to be specified by the Office, to retransmit the original by fax or to submit the original in accordance with Article 63(1)(b) EUTMDR.
Če je sporočilo, prejeto elektronsko, med drugim po telefaksu, nepopolno ali neberljivo ali če Urad utemeljeno dvomi o natančnosti prenosa, bo o tem ustrezno obvestil pošiljatelja in ga pozval, naj v roku, ki ga določi Urad, izvirnik znova pošlje po telefaksu ali ga predloži v skladu s členom 63(1)(b) Delegirane uredbe.
When this request is complied with within the time limit specified, the date of receipt of the retransmission is deemed to be the date of receipt of the original communication.
Če je ta zahteva izpolnjena v določenem roku, se datum prejema ponovno poslanega sporočila šteje za datum prejema izvirnega sporočila.
For more details, see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits.
Za več informacij glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 1: Komunikacijska sredstva, roki.
4.4.3 No return of original documents
Nevračanje izvirnih dokumentov
Original documents become part of the file and therefore cannot be returned to the person who submitted them.
Izvirni dokumenti postanejo del spisa, zato jih ni mogoče vrniti osebi, ki jih je predložila.
However, the party always has the possibility of obtaining a certified or uncertified copy of the original documents, subject to payment of a fee.
Vendar lahko stranka vedno pridobi overjene ali neoverjene kopije izvirnih dokumentov, za kar mora plačati pristojbino.
For further details, see information displayed on the Office's web page under ‘Inspection of files and copies'.
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej informacije na spletni strani Urada pod naslovom Inspection of files and copies (Vpogled v spise in kopije).
4.4.4 Confidential information
Zaupne informacije
Article 114(4) EUTMR
Člen 114(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Sometimes one of the parties requests the Office to keep certain documents confidential, even vis-à-vis the other party in the proceedings.
Včasih ena od strank Urad zaprosi, naj nekatere dokumente obravnava zaupno, tako da jih ne razkrije niti drugi stranki v postopku.
Although the Office can keep documents confidential vis-à-vis third parties (inspection of files), it can under no circumstances keep them confidential vis-à-vis the other party in inter partes proceedings.
Čeprav lahko Urad dokumente obravnava zaupno v zvezi s tretjimi osebami (vpogled v spise), pa v nobenem primeru dokumentov ne more obravnavati zaupno glede na drugo stranko v postopku inter partes.
Each party to the proceedings must always have a right to defend itself.
Vsaka stranka v postopku mora vedno imeti pravico do obrambe.
That means that it should have full access to all material submitted by the other party.
To pomeni, da mora imeti popoln dostop do vseh dokumentov in dokazov, ki jih predloži druga stranka.
It follows that all material submitted by a party should be disclosed to the other party of the proceedings.
Iz tega izhaja, da je treba vse dokumente in dokaze, ki jih predloži stranka, razkriti drugi stranki v postopku.
The Office has an obligation to communicate all material received to the other party.
Urad mora vse dokumente in dokaze, ki jih prejme, poslati drugi stranki.
Therefore, if one of the parties requests certain documents be kept confidential without mentioning whether this should be vis-à-vis third parties, the Office will take it for granted that this is the case and will forward them to the other party and mark them as confidential in the electronic file.
Če torej ena od strank zahteva, naj se nekateri dokumenti obravnavajo zaupno, ne da bi navedla, ali je s tem mišljena zaupnost v zvezi s tretjimi osebami, bo Urad to štel za samoumevno in jih poslal drugi stranki ter jih kot zaupne označil v elektronski datoteki.
If ,in the course of opposition proceedings, the Office receives documents with a request that they be kept confidential inter partes, the sender should be informed that the documents cannot be kept confidential vis-à-vis the other party to the proceedings.
Če Urad med postopkom ugovora prejme dokumente z zahtevo, naj se obravnavajo zaupno inter partes, je treba pošiljatelja obvestiti, da dokumentov ni mogoče obravnavati zaupno v zvezi z drugo stranko v postopku.
To this end, a letter has to be sent, clearly explaining that the sender may choose between disclosure of the documents or withdrawal of the documents.
Zato je treba poslati dopis, v katerem se pojasni, da lahko pošiljatelj izbira med razkritjem in umikom dokumentov.
It is up to the party to decide which of these possibilities is appropriate for its case and inform the Office accordingly.
Stranka se mora odločiti, katera od teh možnosti je primerna za njeno zadevo, in o svoji odločitvi ustrezno obvesti Urad.
If it confirms confidentiality, the documents will not be sent to the other party and will not be taken into account.
Če potrdi zaupnost, dokumenti ne bodo poslani drugi stranki in se ne bo upoštevali.
They will be marked as confidential in the electronic file.
V elektronski datoteki bodo označeni kot zaupni.
If it wants the documents to be taken into account but not available for third parties, the documents can be forwarded to the other party, but must be marked confidential in the electronic file.
Če pošiljatelj želi, da se dokumenti upoštevajo, ne da bi bili na voljo tretjim osebam, se lahko pošljejo drugi stranki, vendar morajo biti v elektronski datoteki označeni kot zaupni.
If it does not reply within the time limit specified, the documents will not be sent to the other party and will not be taken into account.
Če pošiljatelj ne odgovori v določenem roku, dokumenti ne bodo poslani drugi stranki in se ne bodo upoštevali.
For more information on confidentiality claims, reference is made to paragraph 5.1.3 of the Guidelines, Part E, Register Operations, Section 5, Inspection of Files.
Za več informacij o zahtevkih za zaupnost glej odstavek 5.1.3 Smernic, del E: Registri, razdelek 5: Pregled spisov.
Article 115 EUTMR
Člen 63(1)(b) Delegirane uredbe
Article 63(1)(b) EUTMDR
Sporočilo predsednika Urada št.
Decision No EX134 of the President of the Office of 26/11/2013
EX134 z dne 26. novembra 2013
The Office may receive observations from the opponent or applicant in which they refer to documents or evidence submitted in other proceedings, for instance to evidence of use that has already been submitted in a different opposition.
Urad lahko prejme pripombe vložnika ugovora ali prijavitelja, v katerih se ta sklicuje na dokumente ali dokaze, predložene v drugih postopkih, na primer na dokaz o uporabi, ki je bil že predložen v drugem ugovoru.
Such requests are accepted at any stage of the proceedings when the opponent/applicant clearly identifies the documents that it refers to.
Takšna sklicevanja so dopustna na kateri koli stopnji postopka, če vložnik ugovora/prijavitelj jasno opredeli dokumente, na katere se sklicuje.
The party must indicate the following: (1) the number of the opposition it refers to; (2) the title of the document it refers to; (3) the number of pages of this document; and (4) the date this document was sent to the Office.
Stranka mora navesti: (1) številko ugovora, na katerega se sklicuje, (2) naslov dokumenta, na katerega se sklicuje, (3) število strani v tem dokumentu in (4) datum, ko je bil ta dokument poslan Uradu.
For example, ‘the statutory declaration that was submitted to the Office on dd/mm/yy in opposition proceedings B XXX XXX, together with exhibits 1 to 8, consisting of XX pages'.
Na primer, „obvezna izjava, ki je bila Uradu predložena dd/mm/llll v postopku ugovora B XXX XXX skupaj z dokazi od 1 do 8 in ki zajema XX strani“.
Should the documents referred to by the opponent or the applicant consist originally of items of evidence not having been filed in paper format up to and including A3 size, and should this evidence not be available in the electronic file of the Office, the party concerned must, pursuant to Article 63(1)(b) EUTMDR, submit by mail a second copy for transmission to the other party within the original time limit.
Če dokumenti, na katere se sklicuje vložnik ugovora ali prijavitelj, prvotno zajemajo dokaze, ki niso bili predloženi v papirni obliki do vključno velikosti A3, in če ti dokazi niso na voljo v elektronski datoteki Urada, mora zadevna stranka v skladu s členom 63(1)(b) Delegirane uredbe v prvotnem roku po pošti predložiti drugo kopijo, ki bo poslana drugi stranki.
If no copy is provided, these items of evidence will not be taken into account.
Če kopija ni predložena, se ti dokazi ne bodo upoštevali.
In addition, it should be noted that the documents or evidence referred to might need translation into the language of the opposition proceedings.
Poleg tega je treba upoštevati, da bo morda treba navedene dokumente ali dokaze prevesti v jezik postopka ugovora.
Article 146(9) EUTMR, Articles 7(5) and 10(6) EUTMDR and Article 24 EUTMIR apply accordingly.
Ustrezno se uporabljajo člen 146(9) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, člen 7(5) in člen 10(6) Delegirane uredbe ter člen 24 Izvedbene uredbe.
A general reference to documents or evidence submitted in other proceedings will not be accepted.
Splošno sklicevanje na dokumente ali dokaze, predložene v drugem postopku, ni dopustno.
In such a situation the party making general reference to other documents or evidence may be invited to be sufficiently specific within a given time limit.
V takšnem primeru je mogoče stranko, ki se na splošno sklicuje na druge dokumente ali dokaze, pozvati, naj v določenem roku natančno določi to sklicevanje.
The party should be informed that the time limit granted by the Office is only meant for the clear and precise indication of the documents or evidence referred to and that under no circumstances will an extension of the original time limit be granted.
Stranko je treba obvestiti, da je rok, ki ga je odobril Urad, namenjen samo jasni in natančni navedbi dokumentov ali dokazov, na katere se sklicuje, ter da ne bo v nobenem primeru odobreno podaljšanje prvotnega roka.
Moreover, the party should also be informed that if it does not specify what documents are being referred to within the time limit set, those other documents will not be considered.
Poleg tega jo je treba obvestiti tudi, da se ti drugi dokumenti ne bodo upoštevali, če v predpisanem roku ne bo podrobno navedla dokumentov, na katere se sklicuje.
In this case, the reference to documents or evidence submitted in other opposition proceedings has no effect.
V takšnem primeru sklicevanje na dokumente ali dokaze, predložene v drugih postopkih ugovora, nima učinka.
4.5 Further exchanges
Dodatne izmenjave
Article 8(2), (4), (6) and (9) EUTMDR
Člen 8(2), (4), (6) in (9) Delegirane uredbe
The Office invites the applicant to file observations within the time limit set by it in accordance with Article 8(2) EUTMDR.
Urad v skladu s členom 8(2) Delegirane uredbe prijavitelja pozove, naj predloži pripombe v roku, ki mu ga določi.
The applicant can request proof of use of the earlier right with or without submitting observations at the same time on the grounds on which the opposition is based.
Prijavitelj lahko zahteva dokaz o uporabi prejšnje pravice, pri čemer lahko hkrati predloži pripombe glede razlogov, na katerih temelji ugovor, ali pa jih ne predloži.
In that case, the observations may be submitted together with the observations in reply to the proof of use.
V takšnem primeru se lahko pripombe predložijo skupaj s pripombami v odgovor na dokaz o uporabi.
In appropriate cases, the Office may invite the parties to limit their observations to particular issues.
Urad lahko v ustreznih primerih stranki pozove, naj pripombe omejita na določena vprašanja.
In that case, the party is allowed to raise the other issues at a later stage of the proceedings.
V takšnem primeru se stranki dovoli, da druga vprašanja odpre v poznejši fazi postopka.
Once the applicant has submitted its observations in reply, the opponent is granted a final time limit to submit its counter-reply if the Office considers it necessary.
Ko prijavitelj predloži pripombe v odgovor, se vložniku ugovora odobri zadnji rok za predložitev replike, če je to po mnenju Urada potrebno.
After this, the adversarial part of the proceedings is usually closed and the opposition is ready for decision.
Po tem se kontradiktorni del postopka običajno konča in za ugovor je mogoče sprejeti odločbo.
The Office may, however, grant the possibility of another exchange of observations.
Vendar lahko Urad odobri dodatno izmenjavo pripomb.
This can occur when the case deals with complex issues or when the opponent raises a new point and it is admitted to the proceedings.
To se lahko zgodi, kadar se zadeva nanaša na zapletena vprašanja ali kadar vložnik ugovora odpre novo vprašanje in se to v postopku dopusti.
In this case, the applicant must be given a possibility of replying.
V takšnem primeru je treba prijavitelju omogočiti odgovor.
The Office may exercise its discretion in deciding whether another round of observations should be granted to the opponent (e.g. if the applicant raises new issues such as the coexistence of the marks, the invalidity of the earlier right or an agreement between parties).
Urad lahko uveljavlja diskrecijsko pravico pri odločanju, ali bi bilo treba vložniku ugovora odobriti dodaten krog izmenjave pripomb (npr. če prijavitelj odpre nova vprašanja, kot so soobstoj znamk, ničnost prejšnje pravice ali dogovor med strankama).
Pursuant to Article 10(7) EUTMDR, the Office may, under certain circumstances, take into account additional evidence for proof of use that is submitted after expiry of the corresponding time limit.
Urad lahko v skladu s členom 10(7) Delegirane uredbe v nekaterih okoliščinah upošteva dodatnih dokazov za dokaz o uporabi, predložena po izteku ustreznega roka.
Additional evidence will be examined on a case-by-case basis.
Dodatni dokazi bodo proučeni za vsak primer posebej.
For further details, see the Guidelines, Part C, Opposition, Section 6, Proof of Use.
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej Smernice, del C: Ugovor, razdelek 6: Dokaz o uporabi.
4.6 Observations by third parties
Člen 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Communication No 2/09 of the President of the Office of 09/11/2009
2/09 z dne 9. novembra 2009
Third parties can make observations explaining why the EUTM application should not be registered under Article 5 EUTMR or on the basis of one of the absolute grounds of Article 7 EUTMR.
Tretje osebe lahko predložijo pripombe, v katerih pojasnijo, zakaj prijava blagovne znamke EU ne bi smela biti registrirana v skladu s členom 5 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ali na podlagi enega od absolutnih razlogov iz člena 7 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For further details, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, and the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 1, Proceedings.
Za dodatne podrobnosti glej Smernice, del B: Preizkušanje, razdelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev in razdelek 1: Postopek.
Anybody can submit third-party observations; even the opponent is entitled to do so.
Pripombe tretje osebe lahko predloži kdor koli, tudi vložnik ugovora.
However, it should do so in a manner that leaves no doubt that they are third-party observations.
Vendar mora to storiti tako, da ni nobenega dvoma, da so to pripombe tretje osebe.
According to the abovementioned Communication of the President of the Office, the observations must be submitted separately.
V skladu z zgoraj navedenim sporočilom predsednika Urada je treba pripombe predložiti posebej.
However, in practice (30/11/2004, R 735/20002, Serie A (fig.) / LEGA PALLAVOLO SERIE A), the ‘separate submission' requirement is deemed to be satisfied when the observations are clearly separable from the grounds and arguments supporting the opposition, even if they are included in the same document.
Vendar se v praksi (30/11/2004, R 735/20002, Serie A (fig.) / LEGA PALLAVOLO SERIE A) šteje, da je zahteva po ločeni predložitvi izpolnjena, kadar je mogoče pripombe jasno ločiti od razlogov in navedb v podporo ugovoru, tudi če so vključene v isti dokument.
As long as the opponent expressly mentions that it wishes to make observations under Article 45 EUTMR, these will be dealt with, even if they are not submitted separately.
Če vložnik ugovora izrecno navede, da želi predložiti pripombe na podlagi člena 45 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, bodo te obravnavane, tudi če niso predložene ločeno.