natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Additionally, where the opponent indicates in the opposition form that the opposition is based on ‘all goods and services for which the earlier right is registered' but then lists only ‘part' of these goods and services (when compared with the registration certificate or relevant official extract attached to the opposition form) the Office will, in order to overcome the contradictory information contained in the notice of opposition, assume that the opposition is based on ‘all goods and services for which the earlier right is registered'.
Poleg tega bo Urad, če vložnik ugovora na obrazcu za ugovor navede, da ugovor temelji na „vsem blagu in storitvah, za katere je registrirana prejšnja pravica“, vendar nato navede samo del tega blaga in storitev (v primerjavi s potrdilom o registraciji ali ustreznim uradnim izpiskom, priloženim obrazcu za ugovor), zaradi razjasnitve nasprotujočih si informacij v ugovoru domneval, da ugovor temelji na „vsem blagu in storitvah, za katere je registrirana prejšnja pravica“.
Even if the opponent has not indicated, or has not clearly indicated, on which goods and/or services it bases its opposition, it is sufficient if a registration certificate in the language of the proceedings is attached; it is then assumed that the opposition is based on the goods and services that appear in the certificate.
Tudi če vložnik ugovora ni navedel ali ni jasno navedel, na katerem blagu in/ali storitvah temelji njegov ugovor, zadostuje že, če je priloženo potrdilo o registraciji v jeziku postopka; v takem primeru se domneva, da ugovor temelji na blagu in storitvah, ki so navedeni v potrdilu.
However, if the certificate is in a language other than the language of the proceedings or if no certificate is attached, the deficiency must be notified.
Vendar če je potrdilo v jeziku, ki ni jezik postopka, ali če ni priloženo nobeno potrdilo, je treba sporočiti pomanjkljivost.
If an opposition is based on ‘all identical/similar goods and services', clarification must be requested since this wording is not sufficiently clear to identify the basis of the opposition.
Če ugovor temelji na vsem enakem/podobnem blagu in storitvah, je treba zahtevati pojasnilo, saj to besedilo ni dovolj jasno za opredelitev podlage ugovora.
For oppositions based on earlier non-registered trade marks or rights, the opponent must indicate the commercial activities in which they are used.
Vložnik ugovora mora pri ugovorih, ki temeljijo na prejšnjih neregistriranih blagovnih znamkah ali pravicah, navesti gospodarske dejavnosti, v katerih se uporabljajo.
Specific aspects: oppositions filed against international registrations designating the EU
Posebni vidiki: ugovori, vloženi zoper mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU
For admissibility purposes, with regard to oppositions filed against international registrations designating the EU, an indication of the class number(s) only in the notice of opposition is not sufficient to identify the goods and services on which the opposition is based.
V zvezi z dopustnostjo velja, da pri ugovorih, vloženih zoper mednarodne registracije, v katerih je imenovana EU, navedba samo številke razreda ali več številk razredov v ugovoru ne zadostuje za opredelitev blaga in storitev, na katerih temelji ugovor.
If the opposition is based on all or part of the goods and services for which the earlier mark(s) is/are registered/applied for, these goods and services need to be listed in the language of the opposition proceedings.
Če ugovor temelji na vsem blagu in storitvah ali delu blaga in storitev, za katere je prejšnja znamka ali več takih znamk registriranih/prijavljenih, morajo biti to blago in storitve navedeni v jeziku postopka ugovora.
This list must include all the goods or services covered by that mark or at least the relevant goods or services on which the opposition is based.
Ta seznam mora vključevati vse blago ali storitve, zajete z navedeno znamko, ali vsaj zadevno blago ali storitve, na katerih temelji ugovor.
2.4.2.4 Earlier mark with a reputation: territorial scope of reputation
Prejšnja znamka z ugledom: obseg ugleda
When the opponent invokes Article 8(5) EUTMR on the basis of a national trade mark, the Office assumes that reputation is claimed for the territory in relation to which the earlier national mark has protection.
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU na podlagi nacionalne blagovne znamke, Urad domneva, da se ugled uveljavlja za ozemlje, v zvezi s katerim je prejšnja nacionalna znamka zaščitena.
When the opponent invokes Article 8(5) EUTMR on the basis of an international trade mark, the opponent will have to identify the territories for which it claims reputation for its mark.
Če se vložnik ugovora sklicuje na člen 8(5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU na podlagi mednarodne blagovne znamke, bo moral opredeliti ozemlja, za katera uveljavlja ugled svoje znamke.
In the absence of that indication, the Office assumes that reputation is claimed for all the territories in relation to which the earlier mark has protection.
Če navedene navedbe ni, Urad domneva, da se ugled uveljavlja za vsa ozemlja, v zvezi s katerimi je prejšnja znamka zaščitena.
When the earlier mark is an EUTM, no indication is requested since it is considered that the reputation is claimed for the EU.
Če je prejšnja znamka blagovna znamka EU, se navedba ne zahteva, saj se šteje, da se ugled uveljavlja za EU.
2.4.2.5 Identification of the opponent
Opredelitev vložnika ugovora
Article 46(1) EUTMR
Člen 46(1) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
Article 2(2)(h)(i) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(h)(i) Delegirane uredbe
The opponent can either be a natural or a legal person.
Vložnik ugovora je lahko fizična ali pravna oseba.
In order to be able to identify the opponent, there must be an indication of its name and address.
Za opredelitev vložnika ugovora morata biti navedena njegovo ime in naslov.
Until now there have been no oppositions where the opponent was not identified.
Do zdaj ni bilo ugovorov, v katerih vložnik ugovora ni bil opredeljen.
If only the name of the opponent and, for example, a fax number is indicated, the opponent must be asked to give the particulars of its address.
Če sta navedena samo ime vložnika ugovora in na primer številka telefaksa, je treba vložnika ugovora pozvati, naj navede podatke o svojem naslovu.
When examining whether the opponent is clearly identified, attention should be given to the nature of the opponent, that is to say whether it is a natural or legal person.
Pri proučitvi, ali je vložnik ugovora jasno opredeljen, je treba pozornost nameniti vrsti vložnika ugovora, tj. ali gre za fizično ali pravno osebo.
Entitlement
Upravičenost
Article 2(2)(h)(i) and (iii) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(h)(i) in (iii) Delegirane uredbe
It is assumed that the opponent claims to be the owner of the earlier right, unless otherwise stated.
Domneva se, da vložnik ugovora trdi, da je imetnik prejšnje pravice, razen če ni navedeno drugače.
Only if the opponent acts in the capacity of an authorised licensee or a person authorised under national law, does it have to make a statement to that effect, and it has to specify the basis on which it is so entitled or authorised.
Samo če vložnik ugovora deluje kot pooblaščeni pridobitelj licence ali oseba, pooblaščena na podlagi nacionalnega prava, mora v zvezi s tem podati izjavo in opredeliti podlago za to njegovo pravico ali pooblastilo.
If those details are not given, a deficiency must be notified.
Če ti podatki niso navedeni, je treba vložnika ugovora uradno obvestiti o pomanjkljivosti.
In accordance with Article 2(2)(h)(iii) EUTMDR an opponent who acts as a licensee or authorised person has to indicate its name and address in accordance with Article 2(1)(b) EUTMIR.
V skladu s členom 2(2)(h)(iii) Delegirane uredbe mora vložnik ugovora, ki deluje kot pridobitelj licence ali pooblaščena oseba, navesti svoje ime in naslov v skladu s členom 2(1)(b) Izvedbene uredbe.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(1) or (5) EUTMR and thus on trade mark registrations or applications, the notice of opposition may be filed by the owner of these registrations or applications, or by the licensees, provided they are authorised by the owner.
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(1) ali (5) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, torej na registracijah ali prijavah blagovnih znamk, lahko ugovor vloži imetnik teh registracij ali prijav ali pridobitelji licence, če jih pooblasti imetnik.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(3) EUTMR (an agent trade mark), it may be filed by the owner of that trade mark.
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(3) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (blagovna znamka posrednika), ga lahko vloži imetnik navedene blagovne znamke.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(4) EUTMR (earlier marks or signs), it may be filed by the owner of that earlier mark or sign and by persons authorised under the relevant national law to exercise the rights to the earlier mark or sign.
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(4) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU (prejšnje znamke ali znaki), ga lahko vloži imetnik te prejšnje znamke ali znaka ali osebe, ki so na podlagi zadevnega nacionalnega prava pooblaščene za uveljavljanje pravic iz prejšnje znamke ali znaka.
If the notice of opposition is based on the grounds of Article 8(6) EUTMR, it may be filed by any person authorised under the relevant EU legislation or national law to exercise the rights to the earlier protected designation of origin or geographic indication.
Če ugovor temelji na razlogih iz člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, ga lahko vloži vsaka oseba, ki je na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje EU ali nacionalnega prava pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic iz prejšnje zaščitene označbe porekla ali geografske označbe.
As long as the opponent claims to own a right or registration in one of the Member States of the European Union, it is entitled to file an opposition, irrespective of country of origin.
Če vložnik ugovora trdi, da je imetnik pravice ali registracije v eni od držav članic Evropske unije, ima pravico vložiti ugovor ne glede na državo izvora.
Change of owner (transfer of earlier mark) before the opposition is filed
Sprememba imetnika (prenos prejšnje znamke) pred vložitvijo ugovora
Where the earlier mark has been transferred before the opposition is filed, a distinction has to be made between oppositions based on an earlier EUTM and oppositions based on national trade mark registrations (or applications).
Če je bila prejšnja znamka prenesena pred vložitvijo ugovora, je treba razlikovati med ugovori, ki temeljijo na prejšnji blagovni znamki EU, in tistimi, ki temeljijo na registracijah (ali prijavah) nacionalne blagovne znamke.
Oppositions based on an earlier EUTM
Ugovori, ki temeljijo na prejšnji blagovni znamki EU
An opposition based on European Union registrations or applications may be entered by the successor in title of an EUTM only if the conditions set out in Article 20(12) EUTMR are met, namely, only if the opponent has submitted a request for the registration of the transfer when the opposition is filed.
Ugovor, ki temelji na registracijah ali prijavah blagovne znamke Evropske unije, lahko pravni naslednik blagovne znamke EU vloži samo, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 20(12) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, tj. samo če je vložnik ugovora ob vložitvi ugovora predložil prijavo za registracijo prenosa.
According to Article 20(12) EUTMR, where there are time limits to be observed vis-à-vis the Office, the successor in title may make the corresponding statements to the Office once the request for registration of the transfer has been received by the Office.
Člen 20(12) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU določa, da če je treba upoštevati roke Urada, lahko pravni naslednik poda ustrezne izjave Uradu, ko Urad prejme prijavo za registracijo prenosa.
It is up to the opponent to provide this information, and it will not be checked by the Office during the admissibility check.
Te informacije mora zagotoviti vložnik ugovora, Urad pa jih med preizkusom dopustnosti ne bo preverjal.
However, if the opponent mentions in the explanation of its opposition that it is the new owner (or uses similar terms), the Office must request the opponent to indicate the date the request for registration of the transfer was sent to or received by the Office.
Vendar če vložnik ugovora v obrazložitvi svojega ugovora navede, da je novi imetnik (ali uporabi podobne izraze), ga mora Urad pozvati, naj navede datum, ko je bila prijava za registracijo prenosa poslana Uradu ali ko jo je Urad prejel.
Opposition based on a national registration or application
Ugovor, ki temelji na registraciji ali prijavi nacionalne blagovne znamke
An opposition based on a national registration or application may be entered by the ‘old' owner or by the successor in title, as there are different practices in the different Member States regarding the need to register the transfer in the national trade mark register in order to be able to claim rights arising from the registration.
Ugovor, ki temelji na registraciji ali prijavi nacionalne blagovne znamke, lahko vloži prejšnji imetnik ali pravni naslednik, saj so v različnih državah članicah različne prakse glede potrebe po vpisu prenosa v nacionalni register blagovnih znamk za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz registracije.
g. evidence of the transfer or of the granting of a licence before the opposition was filed) has to be proved within the time limit for substantiation.
Vendar je treba upravičenost do vložitve ugovora (npr. dokazi o prenosu ali podelitvi licence pred vložitvijo ugovora) dokazati v roku za utemeljitev.
Multiple opponents
Več vložnikov ugovora
Articles 2(1) and 73(1) EUTMDR
Člen 2(1) in člen 73(1) Delegirane uredbe
In some cases there is more than one opponent indicated in the notice of opposition.
V nekaterih primerih je v ugovoru naveden več kot en vložnik.
There are only two situations in which the Office accepts two or more separate persons (either natural or legal) as multiple opponents, namely:
Možna sta samo dva primera, v katerih Urad priznava dve ali več oseb (fizičnih ali pravnih) kot vložnike ugovora, in sicer:
if they are co-owners of the earlier mark or right;
če so soimetniki prejšnje znamke ali pravice,
if the opposition is filed by the owner or co-owner of an earlier mark or right together with one or more licensees of these earlier marks/rights.
če imetnik ali soimetnik prejšnje znamke ali pravice ugovor vloži skupaj z enim ali več pridobitelji licence za te prejšnje znamke ali pravice.
If there is no indication that the multiple opponents fulfil one of the two requirements mentioned above, they will be asked to indicate their relationship (co-owners or owner/licensee) or to indicate one of the multiple opponents as the only opponent.
Če ni razvidno, da več vložnikov ugovora izpolnjuje eno od zgornjih dveh zahtev, bodo pozvani, naj pojasnijo svoje razmerje (solastništvo ali lastnik/pridobitelj licence) ali naj enega od več vložnikov ugovora imenujejo za edinega vložnika ugovora.
If an earlier mark and/or an earlier right has more than one proprietor (co-ownership), the opposition may be filed by any or all of them.
Če ima prejšnja znamka in/ali prejšnja pravica več kot enega imetnika (solastništvo), lahko ugovor vloži kateri koli od njih ali pa ga vložijo vsi.
However, if the opponents inform the Office that, for example, Company A B.V. owns five of the earlier rights and Company A PLC owns another five, they will have to indicate with whom the opposition will continue.
Vendar če vložniki ugovora Urad obvestijo, da je na primer podjetje A B.V. imetnik petih prejšnjih pravic in podjetje A PLC imetnik drugih petih, bodo morali navesti, s katerim od teh imetnikov se bo nadaljeval ugovor.
As a consequence, five out of the ten earlier rights will not be taken into account.
Pet od desetih prejšnjih pravic se torej ne bo upoštevalo.
If the opponents do not respond appropriately within the 2-month time limit set, the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible.
Če vložniki ugovora ne odgovorijo ustrezno v določenem dvomesečnem roku, bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
Acceptable
Sprejemljivo
The second combination is acceptable only if at least A is one of the opponents.
Druga kombinacija je sprejemljiva samo, če je vsaj oseba A eden od vložnikov ugovora.
Not acceptable
Nesprejemljivo
The opponents will have to be asked to indicate whether they want to continue the proceedings with A or B as an opponent.
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo postopek nadaljevati z osebo A ali B kot vložnikom ugovora.
The opponents will have to be asked to continue the opposition either as multiple opponents based on the first three earlier trade marks or as multiple opponents based on the first, fourth and fifth earlier trade marks.
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora na podlagi prvih treh prejšnjih blagovnih znamk bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora na podlagi prve, četrte in pete prejšnje blagovne znamke.
The opponents will have to be asked to continue the opposition either as multiple opponents A, B and C based on the first and the second earlier trade marks or as multiple opponents A and B based on the first, third, fourth and fifth earlier trade marks.
Vložnike ugovora bo treba pozvati, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora (osebe A, B in C) na podlagi prve in druge prejšnje blagovne znamke bodisi kot več vložnikov ugovora (osebi A in B) na podlagi prve, tretje, četrte in pete prejšnje blagovne znamke.
Indication of relationships other than co-ownership
Navedba razmerja, ki ni solastništvo
Where two opponents are mentioned in the notice of opposition, one as owner of the earlier right, and another as licensee (authorised by the owner to file opposition), no objections will be raised if the owner of all earlier rights on which the opposition is based is the same legal or natural person, regardless of how many licensees join it in the case.
Kadar sta v ugovoru navedena dva vložnika, en kot imetnik prejšnje pravice in drug kot pridobitelj licence (ki ga je za vložitev ugovora pooblastil imetnik), pomisleki ne bodo izraženi, če je imetnik vseh prejšnjih pravic, na katerih temelji ugovor, ista pravna ali fizična oseba, ne glede na to, koliko pridobiteljev licence se ji pridruži v zadevi.
In the following example the opposition is acceptable with A, B and C as multiple opponents.
V naslednjem primeru je ugovor sprejemljiv z osebami A, B in C kot več vložniki ugovora.
By contrast, in the following case, although B is accepted as a multiple opponent as licensee for earlier mark 1, it cannot be accepted as a multiple opponent as owner of earlier mark 3.
Nasprotno pa v naslednjem primeru oseba B, čeprav je v vlogi pridobitelja licence za prejšnjo znamko 1 priznana kot eden od več vložnikov ugovora, v vlogi imetnika prejšnje znamke 3 ne more biti priznana kot eden od več vložnikov ugovora.
The Office will ask the opponents to indicate whether they want to continue the opposition with A or with B as an opponent.
Urad bo vložnike ugovora pozval, naj navedejo, ali želijo ugovor nadaljevati z osebo A ali B kot vložnikom ugovora.
If the opponents do not reply, the opposition is inadmissible.
Če vložniki ugovora ne odgovorijo, je ugovor nedopusten.
In cases where the opposition is based on earlier registered marks, the most common way of providing evidence of co-ownership is to submit a copy of the registration certificate or an extract from an official database.
Kadar ugovor temelji na prejšnjih registriranih znamkah, je dokazi o solastništvu najobičajneje predložiti kot kopije potrdila o registraciji ali izpisek iz uradne podatkovne zbirke.
If the opposition is based on several earlier marks/rights but the opponents have already submitted evidence of co-ownership of one earlier registered mark, the opponents will still be required to confirm ownership of the other earlier rights.
Če ugovor temelji na več prejšnjih znamkah ali pravicah, vendar so vložniki ugovora že predložili dokaze o solastništvu ene prejšnje registrirane znamke, bodo kljub temu pozvani, naj predložijo tudi dokaze o solastništvu drugih prejšnjih pravic.
As at this stage of the opposition proceedings the opponents are not obliged to submit evidence of their earlier marks/rights, a statement confirming their capacity to file an opposition together will be considered sufficient for admissibility purposes.
Ker vložnikom ugovora na tej stopnji postopka ni treba predložiti dokazov o svojih prejšnjih znamkah ali pravicah, se bo izjava, s katero je potrjena njihova pravica do skupne vložitve ugovora, štela za zadostno za namene dopustnosti.
2.4.2.6 Professional representation
Poklicno zastopanje
Representative
Zastopnik
Article 2(2)(h)(ii) and Article 73 EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(h)(ii) in člen 73 Delegirane uredbe
Article 2(2)(h)(ii) EUTMDR provides that if the opponent has designated a representative, it must provide the name and business address of the representative in accordance with Article 2(1)(e) EUTMIR.
Člen 2(2)(h)(ii) Delegirane uredbe določa, da mora vložnik ugovora, če je imenoval zastopnika, v skladu s členom (2)(1)(e) Izvedbene uredbe navesti ime in poslovni naslov zastopnika.
Where there is more than one opponent before the Office a common representative must be appointed.
Če je vložnikov ugovora v postopku pred Uradom več, je treba imenovati skupnega zastopnika.
If the opponent is from the European Economic Area (EEA) (not obliged to be represented under Article 119 EUTMR), failure to appoint a representative, or failure to indicate the name or business address of the representative, merely has the consequence that the Office will communicate with the opponent directly.
Če je vložnik ugovora iz Evropskega gospodarskega prostora (zastopnik na podlagi člena 119 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni potreben), je edina posledica, da ni imenoval zastopnika ali da ni navedel imena ali poslovnega naslova zastopnika, ta, da bo Urad komuniciral neposredno z njim.
If the opponent is obliged to be represented under Article 119 EUTMR, failure to appoint a representative, or failure to indicate the name or business address of the representative, constitutes a relative admissibility deficiency.
Če mora vložnik ugovora imeti zastopnika na podlagi člena 119 Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, neimenovanje zastopnika ali opustitev navedbe imena ali poslovnega naslova zastopnika pomeni relativno pomanjkljivost v zvezi z dopustnostjo.
The Office will invite the opponent to appoint a representative and/or to indicate the name and address of the representative, failing which the opposition will be rejected as inadmissible.
Urad bo vložnika ugovora pozval, naj imenuje zastopnika in/ali navede njegovo ime in naslov, sicer bo ugovor zavržen kot nedopusten.
For further details on professional representatives, see the Guidelines, Part A, General rules, Section 5, Professional Representation.
Za dodatne podrobnosti o poklicnih zastopnikih glej Smernice, del A: Splošna pravila, razdelek 5: Poklicno zastopanje.
2.4.2.7 Signature
Podpis
Article 63(1)(a) EUTMDR
Člen 63(1)(a) Delegirane uredbe
A notice of opposition must be signed by the opponent or, if it is submitted by a representative, by the representative.
Ugovor mora podpisati vložnik ugovora ali zastopnik, če ga vloži zastopnik.
If a notice of opposition is filed by electronic means, the indication of the name of the sender is deemed equivalent to a signature.
Če je ugovor vložen elektronsko, se navedba imena pošiljatelja šteje za enakovredno podpisu.
2.4.2.8 Relative admissibility requirements: sanctions
Relativne zahteve za dopustnost: sankcije
Article 5(5) EUTMDR
Člen 5(5) Delegirane uredbe
If relative admissibility requirements are missing or not complied with, the opponent or its representative is given 2 months to remedy the deficiency.
Če relativne zahteve za dopustnost niso izpolnjene, mora vložnik ugovora ali njegov zastopnik pomanjkljivosti odpraviti v dveh mesecih.
This time limit cannot be extended.
Tega roka ni mogoče podaljšati.
2.4.3 Optional indications
Neobvezne navedbe
2.4.3.1 Extent of opposition
Obseg ugovora
Article 2(2)(i) EUTMDR
Člen 2(2)(i) Delegirane uredbe