natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Upon opposition by any person authorised under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a designation of origin or a geographical indication, the trade mark applied for shall not be registered where and to the extent that, pursuant to the Union legislation or national law providing for the protection of designations of origin or geographical indications:
Ob ugovoru katere koli osebe, ki je v skladu z zadevnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz označbe porekla ali geografske označbe, se blagovna znamka, za katero je vložena prijava, ne registrira, če in kolikor v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom o zaščiti označb porekla ali geografskih označb velja naslednje:
(i) an application for a designation of origin or a geographical indication had already been submitted, in accordance with Union legislation or national law, prior to the date of application for registration of the EU trade mark or the date of the priority claimed for the application, subject to its subsequent registration;
prijava za označbo porekla ali geografsko označbo je že bila vložena v skladu z zakonodajo Unije ali nacionalnim pravom pred datumom prijave za registracijo blagovne znamke EU ali pred datumom prednostne pravice, zahtevane v zvezi s prijavo, pod pogojem, da je ta pozneje registrirana;
(ii) that designation of origin or geographical indication confers the right to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark.
ta označba porekla ali geografska označba podeljuje pravico do prepovedi uporabe poznejše blagovne znamke.
The new ground of opposition for GIs specifies this particular type of earlier right, its beneficiary and its date of priority.
Novi razlog za ugovor za geografske označbe določa to posebno vrsto prejšnje pravice, upravičenca in datum prednostne pravice.
However, apart from those evident specificities, the only substantial difference between Article 8(4) and 8(6) EUTMR is that the latter does not require the opponent to prove use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance.
Vendar je razen teh očitnih posebnosti edina bistvena razlika med členoma 8(4) in 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, da zadnjenavedeni od vložnika ugovora ne zahteva, da dokaže uporabo v gospodarskem prometu, ki je več kot le lokalnega pomena.
The rest of this chapter addresses the particularities of GIs as a basis for opposition.
Vrste geografskih označb, zajete v členu 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU
5.2.1 GIs protected under EU law
[5: Nadomešča in razveljavlja Uredbo (ES) št.
[7: Replaced and repealed Regulation (EEC) No 1576/89.]
aromatizirani vinski proizvodi (v skladu z Uredbo (EU) št.
aromatised wine products (pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 251/2014 , the ‘Aromatised Wines Regulation').
251/2014, v nadaljnjem besedilu: Uredba o aromatiziranih vinih).
[8: Replaced and repealed Regulation (EEC) No 1601/91.]
[8: Nadomešča in razveljavlja Uredbo (EGS) št.
The Foodstuffs Regulation protects GIs that existed in Member States and have been applied for to be registered in the EU system of protection (in a simplified registration procedure) within a 6-month period between 24/07/1993 and 23/01/1994 (with similar application periods provided to any new Member State on accession) subject to its registration, and any further GIs applied for and registered pursuant to the EU system of protection thereafter.
Uredba o živilih ščiti geografske označbe, ki so obstajale v državah članicah in za katere je bila vložena prijava za registracijo v sistemu EU za varstvo (v poenostavljenem postopku registracije) v šestih mesecih med 24. julijem 1993 in 23. januarjem 1994 (s podobnimi roki prijave, ki se vsaki novi državi članici zagotovijo ob pristopu), če se registrirajo, ter vse druge geografske označbe, za katere je vložena prijava in se nato registrirajo v skladu s sistemom EU za varstvo.
The Aromatised Wines Regulation protects GIs that were already protected in a Member State on 27/03/2014 subject to further conditions , and any further GIs applied for and registered pursuant to the EU system of protection thereafter.
Uredba o aromatiziranih vinih ščiti geografske označbe, ki so že bile zaščitene v državi članici dne 27. marca 2014, pod dodatnimi pogoji, ter vse druge geografske označbe, za katere je vložena prijava in se nato registrirajo v skladu s sistemom EU za varstvo.
GIs protected under the above Regulations are, thus, ‘existing GIs' from Member States that existed before the uniform EU system of protection (subject to further conditions of full EU protection) and ‘new GIs' from Member States that have been applied for and registered under the uniform system of EU protection.
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb, so torej obstoječe geografske označbe iz držav članic, ki so obstajale pred enotnim sistemom EU za varstvo (pod dodatnimi pogoji polne zaščite EU) in nove geografske označbe iz držav članic, za katere je bila vložena prijava in so bile registrirane v skladu z enotnim sistemom EU za varstvo.
Furthermore, GIs originating from third countries are also protected under the above Regulations pursuant to direct applications filed with the Commission (as an alternative to their protection through international agreements, discussed in paragraph 5.2.3 below).
Tudi geografske označbe iz tretjih držav so zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb v skladu z neposrednimi prijavami, vloženimi pri Komisiji (kot nadomestna možnost za njihovo zaščito na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, obravnavanih v odstavku 5.2.3 v nadaljevanju).
5.2.1.2 Specifics of substantiation
Posebnosti utemeljitve
GIs protected under the above Regulations may be a valid basis for an opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR, to the extent that they allow the person authorised under the applicable law to exercise those rights to prevent the use of a subsequent mark.
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi zgornjih uredb, so lahko veljavna podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če osebi, ki je v skladu z veljavnim pravom pooblaščena za uveljavljanje teh pravic, omogočajo preprečitev uporabe poznejše znamke.
Their ability to prevent use is governed by the relevant provisions of the Regulations cited above (Articles 13(1), 103(2), 16 and 20(2) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations, respectively).
Njihovo sposobnost preprečevanja uporabe urejajo ustrezne določbe iz zgoraj navedenih uredb (člen 13(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 103(2) Uredbe o vinih, člen 16 Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 20(2) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih).
In this context, it is important to distinguish the latter provisions preventing use from those that prevent registration of a trade mark, which are not a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR.
V okviru tega je pomembno, da se te določbe, ki preprečujejo uporabo, razlikujejo od tistih, ki preprečujejo registracijo blagovne znamke in ki niso podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
[16: Articles 14(1), 102(1), 23(1) and 19(1) of the Foodstuffs, Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations respectively.]
[16: Člen 14(1) Uredbe o živilih, člen 102(1) Uredbe o vinih, člen 23(1) Uredbe o žganih pijačah in člen 19(1) Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih.]
In order to substantiate its right, the opponent must provide the Office with the necessary facts and evidence regarding the existence of its right.
Vložnik ugovora mora za utemeljitev svoje pravice Uradu predložiti potrebna dejstva in dokaze v zvezi z obstojem te pravice.
A mere extract of, or reference to, the relevant online EU databases (DOOR, E-Bacchus or E-Spirit-Drinks) or in the case of spirit drinks, an extract from Annex III to the Spirit Drinks Regulation, is not sufficient, as they do not contain sufficient data to determine all the relevant particulars of the earlier right (e.g. entitlement of the opponent or goods protected by the GI).
Pri tem niso dovolj le izpiski iz ustreznih spletnih podatkovnih zbirk EU (DOOR, E-Bacchus ali E-Spirit-Drinks) ali sklicevanje nanje ali, v primeru žganih pijač, izpisek iz Priloge III k Uredbi o žganih pijačah, saj ne vsebujejo dovolj podatkov za določitev vseh ustreznih podatkov v zvezi s prejšnjo pravico (npr. upravičenost vložnika ugovora ali blago, zaščiteno z geografsko označbo).
For example, the E-Bacchus and E-Spirit-Drinks extracts/database, or Annex III to the Spirits Drinks Regulation merely indicate the country of origin of the GI, which is not sufficient to prove the opponent's entitlement.
Izpiski iz podatkovnih zbirk E-Bacchus in E-Spirit-Drinks ali Priloga III k Uredbi o žganih pijačah navajajo samo državo porekla geografske označbe, kar ne zadostuje kot dokaz upravičenosti vložnika ugovora.
Where available, the opponent must provide the Office with copies of the publication and registration of the GI in the Official Journal (or a reference to the relevant online source recognised by the Office, pursuant to Article 7(3) EUTMDR), and, if these documents are not available or lack information about the opponent's entitlement, further documents must be submitted proving entitlement to file the opposition as an authorised person under the relevant law to exercise the rights arising from a GI (Article 46(1)(d) EUTMR and Article 7(2)(e) EUTMDR) (17/10/2013, R 1825/20124, Dresdner Striezel-Glühwein / Dresdner Stollen, § 37).
Vložnik mora, če so na voljo, Uradu predložiti kopije objave in registracije geografske označbe v uradnem listu (ali sklicevanje na ustrezni spletni vir, ki ga priznava Urad, v skladu s členom 7(3) Delegirane uredbe), če ti dokumenti niso na voljo ali ne zajemajo podatkov o upravičenosti vložnika ugovora, pa je treba predložiti dodatne dokumente, ki dokazujejo upravičenost do vložitve ugovora kot pooblaščena oseba na podlagi zadevnega prava za uveljavljanje pravic, ki izhajajo iz geografske označbe (člen 46(1)(d) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU in člen 7(2)(e) Delegirane uredbe) (17/10/2013, R 1825/20124, Dresdner Striezel-Glühwein / Dresdner Stollen, § 37).
For example, until such time that the so-called single documents summarising the particulars of the GI are available in EBacchus and E-Spirit-Drinks, opponents seeking to rely on the relevant GIs must provide any means of proof to substantiate their entitlement and other relevant particulars of the GI, including national laws or administrative decisions granting GI protection in force at the time of the automatic extension of EU protection .
Na primer, dokler v podatkovnih zbirkah EBacchus in E-Spirit-Drinks niso na voljo tako imenovani enotni dokumenti, ki povzemajo podatke o geografskih označbah, morajo vložniki ugovorov, ki se opirajo na zadevne geografske označbe, za utemeljitev svoje upravičenosti predložiti vse dokaze in druge ustrezne podatke o geografski označbi, tudi nacionalne zakone ali upravne odločbe, ki geografski označbi zagotavljajo varstvo in veljajo v času samodejne razširitve varstva EU.
This arises from the findings of the Court in the Budějovický Budvar case (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, § 95-129).
To izhaja iz ugotovitev Sodišča v zadevi Budějovický Budvar (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521, § 95-129).
Although the Court has not specifically pronounced upon the exhaustive nature of the Wines, Spirit Drinks and Aromatised Wines Regulations, the same principle must apply because they contain substantively similar provisions to the Foodstuffs Regulation and they have the same purpose for the respective products.
Čeprav se Sodišče ni posebej izreklo v zvezi z izčrpnimi pravili Uredbe o vinih, Uredbe o žganih pijačah in Uredbe o aromatiziranih vinih, se mora isto načelo uporabljati tudi za ti dve Uredbi, saj vsebujeta določbe, ki so vsebinsko podobne določbam Uredbe o živilih in imajo v zvezi z zadevnimi proizvodi enak namen.
[18: For additional information, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 10, Trade Marks in Conflict with Designations of Origin and Geographical Indications (Article 7(1)(j) EUTMR).]
[18: Dodatne informacije so na voljo v Smernicah, del B: Preizkušanje, oddelek 4: Absolutni razlogi za zavrnitev, poglavje 10: Blagovne znamke, ki sovpadajo z označbami porekla in geografskimi označbami (člen 7(1)(j) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU).]
5.2.2 GIs protected under the laws of Member States
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi prava držav članic
GIs protected under the laws of Member States may be a basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR only to the extent that no uniform EU protection is in place for the given category of goods.
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi prava držav članic, so lahko podlaga za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU samo, če za zadevno kategorijo blaga ni enotnega sistema EU za varstvo.
For the reasons set out above, in the areas of foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products, protection at EU level is exhaustive in nature, which means that opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR cannot be based on national rights in these areas.
Varstvo na področju živil, vin, žganih pijač in aromatiziranih vinskih proizvodov na ravni EU iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov vsebuje izčrpna pravila, kar pomeni, da na teh področjih ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ne more temeljiti na nacionalnih pravicah.
This is because the EU system of protection comprising the above Regulations overrides and replaces national protection of GIs for foodstuffs, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products.
To pa zato, ker sistem EU za varstvo, ki vključuje zgoraj Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, razveljavlja in nadomešča nacionalno varstvo geografskih označb za živila, vina, žgane pijače in aromatizirane vinske proizvode.
Consequently, GIs for certain foodstuffs and certain non-food agricultural products (as set out in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Annex I to the Foodstuffs Regulation), wines and grapevine products (as set out in Annex VII, part 2, to the Wines Regulation), spirit drinks (as set out in Annex II to the Spirit Drinks Regulation) and aromatised wine products (as set out in Annex II to the Aromatised Wines Regulation) that may claim protection under national laws are not a proper basis for opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR.
Zato geografske označbe za nekatera živila in neživilske kmetijske proizvode (kot je določeno v Prilogi I k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in Prilogi I k Uredbi o živilih), vina in proizvode iz vinske trte (kot je določeno v delu 2 Priloge VII k Uredbi o vinih), žgane pijače (kot je določeno v Prilogi II k Uredbi o žganih pijačah) ter aromatizirane vinske proizvode (kot je določeno v Prilogi II k Uredbi o aromatiziranih vinskih proizvodih), za katere se lahko zahteva zaščita na podlagi nacionalnega prava, niso utemeljen razlog za ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU.
For the latter products, the opponent must invoke the relevant EU legislation in the notice of opposition.
Za navedene proizvode se mora vložnik ugovora v obvestilu o ugovoru sklicevati na ustrezno zakonodajo EU.
Article 8(6)(i) EUTMR requires proof of registration of the GI invoked.
21: Na primer vino, peneče vino, likersko vino, vinski mošt, vendar ne vinski kis.][
Accordingly, the opponent must submit the relevant registration certificate or equivalent documents emanating from the competent national registration authority.
22: Na primer žitno žganje, vinsko žganje, sadno žganje, brendi, likerji, rum, viski, gin.][
Such evidence may be provided by making reference to an online source recognised by the Office (Article 7(3) EUTMDR).
V skladu s tem mora vložnik ugovora predložiti ustrezno potrdilo o registraciji ali enakovredne dokumente, ki jih izda pristojni nacionalni organ za registracijo.
Further, pursuant to Article 7(2)(e) EUTMDR, where the earlier GI is invoked pursuant to the law of a Member State, the opponent must provide a clear identification of the content of the national law relied upon by adducing publications of the relevant provisions or case-law.
Dokazila morajo podpreti vse podatke o geografski označbi, tudi njeno ime, ki je zaščiteno kot geografska označba, zajeto blago, pridobitev pred datumom prednostne pravice izpodbijane znamke, dokaz o upravičenosti in dokaz, da zaščita na podlagi nacionalnega prava upravičencu geografske označbe podeljuje neposredno pravico do ukrepanja zoper nepooblaščeno uporabo.
It may provide such evidence by making a reference to a relevant online source recognised by the Office.
Te dokaze lahko predloži s sklicevanjem na ustrezni spletni vir, ki ga priznava Urad.
The opponent must prove the conditions of the scope of protection and particulars proving that those conditions are fulfilled in the given case.
Vložnik ugovora mora dokazati pogoje obsega varstva in podatke, ki dokazujejo, da so ti pogoji v zadevnem primeru izpolnjeni.
5.2.3 GIs protected under international agreements
Geografske označbe, zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov
Notwithstanding that Article 8(6) EUTMR does not explicitly mention GIs protected under international agreements, the reference to ‘Union legislation' and ‘national law' naturally includes international agreements as they form part of the legal order of the European Union or the Member State that is a party to the international agreement.
Ne glede na to, da člen 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU geografskih označb, ki so zaščitene na podlagi mednarodnih sporazumov, ne omenja izrecno, sklicevanje na zakonodajo Unije in nacionalno pravo seveda vključuje mednarodne sporazume, saj so del pravnega reda Evropske unije ali države članice, ki je pogodbenica mednarodnega sporazuma.
In order for an opposition under Article 8(6) EUTMR to be successful on the basis of a right deriving from any international agreement, the provisions under the international agreement must be directly applicable and they must allow the beneficiary of the relevant GI to take direct legal action to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark (see paragraph 3.1 above concerning the requirement of a direct right of action).
Da bi bil ugovor na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU uspešen na podlagi pravice, ki izhaja iz katerega koli mednarodnega sporazuma, se morajo določbe na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma neposredno uporabljati, upravičencu zadevne geografske označbe pa morajo omogočati, da za prepoved uporabe poznejše znamke uporabi neposreden sodni postopek (glej odstavek 3.1 zgoraj o zahtevi za neposredno pravico do ukrepanja).
In the latter respect, international agreements are not always self-executing.
Glede na zadnjenavedeno se mednarodni sporazumi ne izvajajo vedno neposredno.
This depends on the characteristics of the agreement itself and on how they have been interpreted in the relevant jurisdiction.
To je odvisno od značilnosti sporazuma in od tega, kako se razlagajo v okviru ustrezne jurisdikcije.
For example, the Office considers that the provisions of the Lisbon Agreement (in particular Articles 3 and 8) are not self-executing.
Urad na primer meni, da se določbe Lizbonskega aranžmaja (zlasti člena 3 in 8) ne izvajajo neposredno.
As expressly indicated by Article 8 of the Lisbon Agreement, it is the relevant national legislation that must determine which type of legal actions may be taken, their scope and whether these legal actions include allowing the proprietor of an appellation of origin to prohibit the use of a subsequent trade mark.
Kot je izrecno navedeno v členu 8 Lizbonskega aranžmaja, mora o vrsti sodnih postopkov, ki se lahko uporabijo, njihovem obsegu in tem, ali ti sodni postopki vključujejo možnost, da imetnik označbe porekla prepove uporabo poznejše znamke, odločiti ustrezna nacionalna zakonodaja.
Therefore, in such cases, the requisite national legislation must be adduced as this is a necessary component in order for the opponent to prove that the GI in question can prevent use of the subsequent mark and that the opponent is entitled by the law governing the right to exercise this right.
Zato je treba v takšnih primerih navesti ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo, saj je to nujen element, s katerim vložnik ugovora dokaže, da lahko zadevni geografski označbi prepreči uporabo poznejše znamke in da je vložnik ugovora upravičen do uveljavljanja te pravice na podlagi zakona, ki ureja to pravico.
International agreements entered into by the EU
Mednarodni sporazumi, ki jih je sklenila EU
GIs deriving from agreements between the EU and third countries can be invoked under Article 8(6) EUTMR, if the provisions of these agreements vest the GI in a particular beneficiary or a precise class of users that have a direct right of action.
Na geografske označbe, ki izhajajo iz sporazumov med EU in tretjimi državami, se je mogoče sklicevati na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU, če določbe iz teh sporazumov geografsko označbo dodelijo določenemu upravičencu ali natančni kategoriji uporabnikov, ki imajo neposredno pravico do ukrepanja.
Some Member States (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Portugal and Slovakia) are party to the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration of 1958 (as revised at Stockholm on 14/07/1967, and as amended on 28/09/1979).
[24: Nekatere države članice (Bolgarija, Češka, Francija, Madžarska, Italija, Portugalska in Slovaška) so pogodbenice Lizbonskega aranžmaja o zaščiti označb porekla in njihovi mednarodni registraciji iz leta 1958 (revidiranega v Stockholmu 14. julija 1967 in spremenjenega 28. septembra 1979).
The European Union is not a signatory to the Lisbon Agreement.]
Evropska unija ni podpisnica Lizbonskega aranžmaja.]
For the reasons set out in paragraph 5.2.1.3 above, a GI protected under an international agreement concluded by Member States (either among Member States or with third countries) cannot be invoked as an earlier right under Article 8(6) EUTMR if it encroaches upon the exhaustive nature of EU law in the relevant areas (currently certain foodstuffs and other agricultural products, wines, spirit drinks and aromatised wine products).
Zaradi razlogov, določenih v zgoraj navedenemu odstavku 5.2.1.3, se na geografsko označbo, zaščiteno na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, ki ga sklenejo države članice (med seboj ali s tretjimi državami), kot prejšnjo pravico na podlagi člena 8(6) Uredbe o blagovni znamki EU ni mogoče sklicevati, če na ustreznih področjih (v tem primeru nekatera živila in drugi kmetijski proizvodi, vina, žgane pijače ter aromatizirani vinski proizvodi) posega v izčrpna pravila zakonodaje EU.
In the Budějovický Budvar case (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521), the Court discussed the exhaustive nature of EU law as regards GIs originating from Member States.
Sodišče je v zadevi Budějovický Budvar (08/09/2009, C478/07, Budějovický Budvar, EU:C:2009:521) razpravljalo o izčrpnosti prava EU v zvezi z geografskimi označbami, ki izvirajo iz držav članic.
In the Office's interpretation, this also applies a fortiori to third-country GIs in the relevant product fields that enjoy protection in the territory of a Member State through an international agreement concluded between that Member State and a non-EU country .
Na podlagi razlage Urada to še toliko bolj velja tudi za geografske označbe tretje države na ustreznih področjih proizvodov, ki so na ozemlju države članice zaščiteni na podlagi mednarodnega sporazuma, sklenjenega med navedeno državo članico in tretjo državo.
[25: To which the EU is not a contracting party.]
[25: EU ni pogodbenica tega sporazuma.]
This equally applies to the Lisbon Agreement.
Enako velja tudi za Lizbonski aranžma.
The Lisbon Agreement creates an international registration and protection system for ‘appellations of origin' (Article 2(1)).
Lizbonski aranžma določa sistem za mednarodno registracijo in varstvo za označbe porekla (člen 2(1)).
The definition of ‘appellations of origin' for food and beverage products under this Agreement is largely equivalent to that of a ‘designation of origin' under the relevant EU regulations.
Opredelitev izraza označbe porekla za živila in pijače na podlagi tega aranžmaja je precej enaka opredelitvi izraza označba porekla na podlagi zadevnih uredb EU.