natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Office has thus been able to contribute its operational experience in relation to the drafting of Community documents, such as the Green Paper on the future of preferential systems and the modernisation of the customs code, as well as more spe-cific regulations, such as a proposal to regulate mushroom quotas, or certificates of origin for garlic imported from third countries.
OLAF mohol svojimi skúsenos╃ami pomôc╃ pri vypracúvanî dokumentov Spolo-┘enstva, najmä zelenej knihy o preferen┘nþch r e Š i m o c h a modernizâcii colnêho zâkona a ùpecifickejùîch nariadenî, ako sú nâvrh predpisu o kontingentoch ùampi┵ónov alebo osved┘enî o pôvode pre cesnak, d o v â Š a n þ tretîmi krajinami.
In the area of direct expenditure, the new model memorandum of understanding for par-ticipation by the candidate countries in Community programmes will include clauses ensuring more effective protection of financial interests.
V oblasti priamych vþdavkoch bude novþ model protokolu k dohode o ú┘asti obsahova╃ d o l o Š k y zabezpe┘ujúce ú┘innejùiu ochranu finan┘nþch zâujmov.
`Reforming the Commission', White Paper, Part I, point V3, and Part II, point XXX, COM(2000) 200 final.Commission communication concerning the fraud-proofing of legislation and contract management, of 7.11.2001, SEC(2001) 2029 final.
Reforma Komisie, Biela kniha ┘as╃ I bod V3 a ┘as╃ II bod XXX, KOM(2000) 200 v kone┘nom znenî.Oznâmenie Komisie o ochrane legislatîvy a m a na Š o v a n þ c h zmlúv pred podvodmi z 7.11.2001, SEK(2001) 2029 kone┘-nê znenie.
COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE AND CUSTOMS MATTERS
SPOLUPRÂCA V POブNOHOSPODÂRSKEJ A COLNEJ OBLASTI
The instrument for cooperation in agricultural and customs matters (43) lays down the conditions under which the customs and agricultural authorities of the Member States cooperate with one another and also with the Commission at the request of an applicant authority or spontaneously, to ensure, notably, the exercise of a special surveillance on persons, places, movements of goods and means of transportation, administrative inquir-ies, the providing of a document, etc.
Nâstroj spoluprâce v po┱nohospodârskych a colnþch z â l e Š i t o s t i a c h 4 3 ur┘uje podmienky, za akþch colnê a po┱nohospodârske orgâny ┘lenskþch ùtâtov spolupracujú medzi sebou na-vzâjom a s Komisiou, bu┛ na Šiados╃ d o Š a d u j ú c e h o orgânu alebo spontânne, s cie┱om za-bezpe┘i╃ vykonâvanie osobitnêho doh┱adu nad osobami, miestami, pohybom tovarov a do-pravnþch prostriedkov, administratîvne vyùetrovania, vydâvanie osved┘enî at┛.
The national authorities communicate to the Commission any relevant information concerning irregularities detected and suspected fraud, the meth-ods and the practices used, etc. (Article 17).
Nariadenîm sa zavâdza ve┱mi ùirokþ systêm vþmeny informâciî, v ktorom vnútroùtâtne or-gâny oznamujú Komisii akêko┱vek u Š i t o ┘ n ê informâcie tþkajúce sa zistenþch nezrovnalos-tî a podozrenî z podvodu, p o u Š i t þ c h metód a prostriedkov at┛. (┘lânok 17).
The regulation also makes provisions for mutual assistance with the authorities in third countries and the information from the Commission when this presents a particular interest (Articles 19 to 22).
Nariadenie zârove┵ ustanovuje vzâjomnú pomoc s ú┘as╃ou orgânov z tretîch krajîn a informovanie Komisie kedyko┱vek, ke┛ je to mimoriadne d ô l e Š i t ê (┘lânky 19 « 22).
The regulation established a customs information system (Articles 23 to 41) that enables information to be disseminated rapidly and makes the cooperation procedures more effi-cient (44).
Nariadenîm sa zavâdza colnþ informa┘nþ systêm (┘lânky 23 « 41), ktorþ u m o Š ┵ u j e rþchle ùîrenie informâciî a zvyùuje efektivitu postupov spoluprâce44.
This year this subject was chosen by the Commission and the Member States as one of the central questions covered in the questionnaire.
V tomto roku si Komisia a ┘lenskê ùtâty zvolili túto têmu za jednu z ústrednþch têm ob-siahnutþch v dotaznîku.
The following section gives an overview on the state of play in this area.
V nasledujúcej ┘asti sa uvâdza celkovþ preh┱ad o situâcii v tejto oblasti.
Results of analysis of the contributions from the Member States (
Uplat┵ovanie nariadenia je vo vùeobecnosti uspokojivê.
While in general the implementation of the regulation is satisfactory, analyses shows that the quality of both Member State and Commission statistical data could be improved and that certain practical problems should be resolved.
Analþzou sa zistilo, Še by sa dala dosiahnu╃ vyùùia kvalita ùtatistickþch údajov, ktorê sú k dispozîcii na úrovni ┘lenskþch ùtâ-tov a Komisie a Še je potrebnê vyrieùi╃ ur┘itê ╃ a Š k o s t i praktickêho charakteru.
Statistics on communications.
Ùtatistiky tþkajúce sa oznâmenî.
Most Member States have encountered difficulties in sup-plying reliable and coherent statistics concerning the communications or reports request-ed.
Vä┘ùina ┘lenskþch ùtâtov mala ╃ a Š k o s t i s poskytnutîm spo┱ahlivþch a súvislþch ùtatistîk tþkajúcich sa oznâmenî alebo sprâv.
The Member States have neither a centralised database for this type of information nor a uniform definition of the concept of `mutual assistance communication'.
Pre takþto druh in-formâciî nemâ vytvorenú centrâlnu databâzu a nemâ ani jednotnú definîciu pojmu ‡ozna-movanie vzâjomnej pomociƒ.
No analysis was therefore possible and examination of the figures was based merely on a quantitative ap-proach.
Pri skúmanî tþchto ┘îselnþch údajov sa mohol uplatni╃ iba kvantitatîvny prîstup; nebolo m o Š n ê uskuto┘ni╃ Šiadnu analþzu.
Also, there are no exploitable statistics on the number of communications and reports requested by or communicated to the Commission.
Nie sú k dispozîcii ani p o u Š i t e ┱ n ê ùtatistiky o po┘te oznâmenî a sprâv v y Š i a d a n þ c h Komisiou alebo oznâmenþch Komisii.
Improvement of the databases is desirable for use in risk analysis.
Je Šiaduce zlepùi╃ databâzu, aby sa údaje, ktorê databâza obsahuje, mohli p o u Š i ╃ na analþzu rizika.
Handling of request for mutual assistance. Member States have reported problems, in particular response time, the quality and relevance of responses (or even the absence of any response, particularly from certain third countries) and translation problems.
Vybavovanie Šiadostî o vzâjomnú pomoc. ﾚlenskê ùtâty mali problêmy, najmä ┘o sa tþka lehôt, v akþch poskytovali odpovede, kvality a relevantnosti odpovedî (v prîpade niekto-rþch tretîch krajîn neboli dokonca ani poskytnutê) a takisto sa vyskytli problêmy s pre-kladmi.
As a result, the time limit for instituting the proceedings in question sometimes expires.
Vþsledkom je niekedy preml┘anie za┘atþch akciî.
Most of the Member States regularly use reminders to speed up the procedure.
Vä┘ùina ┘lenskþch ùtâtov pravi-delne v y u Š î v a l a upomienky, aby urþchlila konanie.
Regulation (EC) No 515/97, OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, supplemented by Commission Regulation (EC) No 696/98: OJ L 96, 28.3.1998, p.
Nariadenie (ES) ┘. 515/97, Ú. v.
22.A third pillar instrument has been introduced to complete the system.
ES L 82, 22.3.1997, doplnenê nariadenîm Komisie (ES) ┘. 696/98, Ú. v.
The Naples II Convention lays down the arrangements for mutual assistance in the context of criminal investigations of infringements of Community and national customs regulations.
Niektorê vyùetrovania sú len prirodzenþm pred┰Šenîm administratîvnych vyùetrovanî uskuto┘nenþch na zâklade naria-denia (ES) ┘. 515/97.
In 2004, 10 Member States (Belgium, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland,) ratified the Naples II Convention. A further two (Czech Republic, Estonia) ratified it at the beginning of 2005.
V roku 2004 ratifikovalo uvedenþ dohovor desa╃ ┘lenskþch ùtâtov (Rakúsko, Belgicko, Cyprus, Ma┛ar-sko, Litva, Lotyùsko, Portugalsko, Fînsko, Slovinsko, Slovensko). ﾝalùie dva ùtâty (ﾚeskâ republika a Estónsko) ho ratifikovali za┘iatkom roka 2005.
Although the Commission updates and distributes the contact list during each mutual assistance committee meeting (two or three times a year), it has been reported that sometimes it is difficult to determine the competent authority in a third country in a Member State (when a request is sent by a third country).
Še Komisia aktualizuje a rozùiruje zoznam kontaktnþch orgânov na k a Š d o m zasadanî vþ-boru pre vzâjomnú pomoc (dvakrât a Š trikrât ro┘ne), bolo oznâmenê, Še niekedy je ╃ a Š k ê ur┘i╃ kompetentnþ orgân tretej krajiny alebo ┘lenskêho ùtâtu (ke┛ d o Š i a d a n i e posiela tretia krajina).
In some Member States, there are two or more competent administrations for the application of customs legislation; messages are then handled in the same way as other requests for mu-tual assistance; a central coordinating unit or office generally receives the message and conducts an initial analysis of it in order to determine which competent authority should deal with it (48).
┘lenskê ùtâty majú dva alebo nieko┱ko sprâvnych orgânov oprâvnenþch vykonâva╃ colnê prâvne predpisy, ale tieto oznamy sa rieùia rovnakþm spôsobom ako ostatnê Šiadosti o vzâ-jomnú pomoc: vo vùeobecnosti sa takþto oznam doru┘î centrâlnej koordina┘nej jednotke alebo orgânu, ktorþ vykonâ jeho prvú analþzu s cie┱om ur┘i╃ prîsluùnþ orgân, ktorþ sa nîm musî zaobera╃48.
The results are conveyed to the Commission (OLAF) by the coordinating unit/office.
Koordina┘nâ jednotka/orgân poùle prîpadnê vþsledky Komisii (OLAF).
Necessity of a judicial authorisation.
Nutnos╃ súdneho povolenia.
Where the consent of the judicial authority is re-quired to implement a measure needed to handle a request for mutual assistance, the in-formation thus obtained is conveyed to the requesting Member State (49).
V prîpade, Še sa na uskuto┘nenie úkonu potrebnêho na vy-bavenie d o Š i a d a n i a vzâjomnej pomoci v y Š a d u j e súhlas súdneho orgânu, zîskanâ informâ-cia sa odovzdâ d o Š a d u j ú c e m u ùtâtu49.
An additional judicial authorisation may be necessary for the transmission of information.
Na odovzdanie informâcie sa m ô Š ev y Š a d o v a ╃ doda- to┘nê súdne povolenie.
Member States differ widely as to which types of investigative measures require authorisation from the judicial authority; in particular, the customs authorities have more extensive powers of administrative inquiry.
V ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch existujú rozdiely, ┘o sa tþka druhu aktu zis╃ovania, ktorþ si v y Š a d u j e povolenie súdneho orgânu; tþka sa to najmä prâvomocî admi-nistratîvneho vyùetrovania colnþch orgânov.
Generally speaking, however, each time such an authorisation is required to take an investigative measure, it is also required in order to send the report to the requesting Member State (50).
Vo vùeobecnosti vùak platî, Še v Š d y , ke┛ sa na plnenie aktu zis╃ovania v y Š a d u j e povolenie, povolenie sa v y Š a d u j e aj na odovzdanie sprâvy d o Š a d u j ú c e m u ùtâtu50.
Certain Member States also impose additional require-ments, not laid down in the regulation, for transmitting the data obtained.
Niektorê ┘lenskê ùtâty ustanovili aj ┛alùie podmienky pre odovzdâ-vanie zîskanþch údajov, ktorê tþmto nariadenîm nie sú upravenê.
Treatment of reports submitted following a mission in a third country.
Spracovanie sprâv pre d l o Š e n þ c h po misii do tretej krajiny.
Following a Community mission in a third country, a report, countersigned by those taking part in the mission, and the supporting documentation which could be used as evidence, are sent to the Member States concerned even if they have not taken part in the mission (51).
Po skon┘enî misie do tretej krajiny sa sprâva spolupodpîsanâ ú┘astnîkmi misie, ako aj doklady, ktorê sa m ô Š u v y Š a d o - v a ╃ ako dôkaznê materiâly, poùlú zainteresovanþm ┘lenskþm ùtâtom, aj ke┛ sa tieto ùtâty na misii nezú┘astnili51.
The Commission wished to know if the reports and documentation could be used as evidence in a recovery procedure before a national court, whether the Member State took part in the mission or not.
Komisia mala zâujem zisti╃, ┘i sa dodanê sprâvy a doklady m ô Š u pou-Ši╃ ako dôkaznþ materiâl po┘as procesu vymâhania poh┱adâvok na vnútroùtâtnom súde bez oh┱adu na skuto┘nos╃, ┘i sa ┘lenskþ ùtât misie zú┘astnil alebo nezú┘astnil.
The Member States replied in the affirmative.
Na túto otâzku ┘lenskê ùtâty odpovedali kladne.
However, there may be dif-ficulties with the evidence in a recovery procedure in a Member State that has not taken part in the mission in cases where the third country has not signed the report, something which is not required by the Community regulation.
Nepodpîsanie tejto sprâvy tretîmi orgânmi (ktorþch pod-pis nepredpisujú prâvne predpisy Spolo┘enstva) vùak m ô Š e spôsobi╃ ╃ a Š k o s t i s dokazova-nîm po┘as procesu za┘atêho v ┘lenskom ùtâte, ktorþ sa misie nezú┘astnil.
Statistics on follow-up of cases reported.
Ùtatistiky o vyrieùenî oznâmenþch prîpadov.
The cooperation agreements signed with India (20.10.2004) and Mexico (26.3.2001) came into force.Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 515/97.In Poland, the Bureau for International Treasury Relations is the main correspondent of the Commission, but the customs authorities must also be contacted in a certain number of cases.
ﾚlânok 18 nariadenia 515/95.V Po┱sku je hlavnþm kontaktnþm subjektom pre Komisiu Kancelâria medzinârodnþch vz╃ahov Ùtâtnej pokladnice, ale v ur┘itþch prîpadoch treba kontaktova╃ aj colnê orgâny.
Both services are departments of the Ministry of Finance.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 515/95.With the exception of France, Poland and Slovakia concerning customs investigations.Article 20 of the regulation.Article 49 of the regulation, generally made through the OWNRES system.
Oba subjekty sú odbormi ministerstva financiî.ﾚlânok 3 nariadenia 515/95.Okrem Po┱ska, Slovenska a Francúzska pri colnþch vyùetrovaniach.ﾚlânok 20 nariadenia.ﾚlânok 49; vo vùeobecnosti sa uskuto┘┵uje prostrednîctvom systêmu OWNRES.
Measures taken by the Commission in 2004
Opatrenia Komisie prijatê v roku 2004
Stepping up cooperation in agricultural and customs matters.
Zlepùenie spoluprâce v po┱nohospodârskej a colnej oblasti.
Following the thematic report of the Budget DG on the handling of mutual assistance messages (53), the Commis- sion consulted the Member States and confirmed the need to:
V nadväznosti na tematickú sprâvu GR pre rozpo┘et, ktorâ sa tþka spracovania oznamov v râmci vzâjomnej pomoci53,
̋ foster a better cooperative environment between the tools of detection, investigation and prosecution (articulation between mutual assistance sheets, CIS (54) and
« zabezpe┘i╃ prostredie, ktorê bude priaznivejùie pre vzâjomnþ vz╃ah medzi nâstrojmi zis╃ovania, zis╃ovanîm a stîhanîm (prepojenie databâz vzâjomnej pomoci, SID54 a FI-
̋ better synergy between the respective aims of various Commission departments.
« lepùej sú┘innosti cie┱ov jednotlivþch útvarov Komisie.
In 2004, a feasibility study was conducted with a view to creating an electronic message: `Mutual assistance/fraud communication'.
V roku 2004 sa za┘ala uskuto┘┵ova╃ ùtúdia realizovate┱nosti s cie┱om pripravi╃ vytvorenie elektronickêho posielania informâciî ‡vzâjomnâ pomoc « oznamovanie podvodovƒ.
Extension of cooperation to other areas.
Rozùîrenie spoluprâce na ┛alùie oblasti.
On 20 July 2004, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Parliament and Council regulation on mutual administrative assist-ance (56).
D┵a 20. júla 2004 Komisia pre d l o Š i l a nâvrh na-riadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady v oblasti vzâjomnej administratîvnej pomoci56.
The proposed regulation could provide a more detailed legislative framework in the fight against fraud and encourages cooperation with and coordination by the Commission, par-ticularly OLAF.
Navrhovanê nariadenie by p o s l ú Š i l o ako podrobnejùî prâvny zâklad v boji proti podvodom a podporilo by spoluprâcu a koordinâciu na úrovni Spolo┘enstva s Komisiou a najmä s OLAF-om.
The proposal is horizontal: it covers all the areas involved in the fight against Community fraud not yet addressed by sectoral legislation, in particular the cooperation between Member States and the Commission in the fight against intra-Community VAT fraud (57), the Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
Nâvrh nariadenia mâ horizontâlny charakter; zahr┵uje vùetky oblasti boja proti podvodom v râmci Spolo┘enstva, ktorê eùte nie sú upravenê predpismi tþkajúcimi sa jednotlivþch sektorov, najmä spoluprâcu medzi ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi a Komisiou v boji proti podvodom vo vnútri Spolo┘enstva v prîpade DPH57, ùtrukturâlnych fondov a priamych vþ-davkov.
It also concerns the use of information on financial transactions suspected of involving laundering of proceeds from Community fraud.
Tþka sa najmä p o u Š î v a n i a informâciî o finan┘nþch operâciâch, u ktorþch je podo-zrenie, Še ide o pranie ùpinavþch pe┵azî, ktorê pochâdzajú z podvodu vo vnútri Spolo┘en-stva.
Cooperation should be used above all for cases of particular impor-tance for the Community, i.e. tax losses of at least EUR 500 000 in cases of VAT fraud or of EUR 100 000 in other cases.
Spoluprâca by sa mala zamera╃ na prîpady s mimoriadnym vþznamom na úrovni Spolo┘enstva, t. j. na prîpady predstavujúce ujmu na daniach najmenej 500 000 eur v prî-pade podvodu, ktorþ sa tþka DPH, a 100 000 eur v ostatnþch prîpadoch.
Thematic report of 2002 on the handling of mutual assistance messages in the Member States.Database `Customs information system', foreseen by the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the Use of Information Tech-nology for Customs Purposes (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995).
Novê spolo┘nê rozhranie by malo u m o Š n i ╃ uchovâva╃ ur┘itê m n o Š s t v o informâciî, ktorê sú obsiahnutê v sprâvach vzâjomnej pomoci.Vytvorenie databâzy na zis╃ovanie prîpadov colnêho vyùetrovania (FIDE) je ustanovenê dodatkovþm protokolom z 8. mâja 2003 k dohovoru o p o u Š î v a n î informatiky v oblasti ciel (Ú. v.
A new common interface should allow the storage of a certain amount of information from the mutual assistance messages.The creation of a customs files identification database (FIDE) foreseen by the additional protocol to the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes of 8 May 2003 (OJ C 139, 13.6.2003).
EÚ C 139, 13.6.2003). Cie┱om FIDE je u m o Š n i ╃ prîsluùnþm orgânom ┘lenskêho ùtâtu zisti╃ prîsluùnê orgâny ostatnþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtov, ktorê vyùetrujú alebo vyùetro-vali tie istê osoby alebo podniky.KOM(2004) 509 kone┘nê znenie.Ú┘elom navrhovanêho nariadenia je doplni╃ nariadenie Rady (ES) ┘.
Its objective is to allow the competent authorities of a Member State to identify the competent authorities of the other Member States who investigated the same persons or companies.COM(2004) 509 final.The aim of the proposed regulation is to supplement Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 of 7.10.2003, OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, which concerns only cooperation between Member States, and not between Member States and the Com-mission.
1798/2003 zo 7. októbra 2003 (Ú. v. EÚ L 264, 15.10.2003), ktorê sa tþka iba spoluprâce medzi ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi a nie medzi ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi a Komisiou.
The Commission supervises the recovery of amounts unduly paid by the Communities as the result of an error, fraud or another irregularity, and the collection of own resources.
Komisia dohliada na vymâhanie súm, ktorê Spolo┘enstvâ neoprâvnene vyplatili v dôsledku chyby, podvodu alebo inej nezrovnalosti, a takisto na vyberanie súm z vlastnþch zdrojov.
In the areas directly managed by it, the Commission itself is responsible for recovery.
V oblastiach priameho riadenia patrî vymâhanie do oblasti jej vlastnej prâvomoci.
In areas in which management has been decentralised, this responsibility is shared, with the Commission following the recovery procedures initiated by the Member States or else applying the clearance procedures.
V oblas-tiach decentralizovanêho riadenia je zodpovednos╃ rozdelenâ, Komisia sleduje procesy vy-mâhania vedenê ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi a v prîpade potreby uplat┵uje kontrolnê postupy.
In 2004, the Commission took several measures aimed at improving recovery of own resources, agricultural funds, Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
V roku 2004 Komisia prijala nieko┱ko opatrenî na zlepùenie vymâhania prostriedkov v oblasti vlastnþch zdrojov, po┱nohospodârstva, ùtrukturâlnych fondov a priamych vþdavkov.
Member States are responsible for the recovery of traditional own resources.
ﾚlenskê ùtâty sú zodpovednê za vymâhanie tradi┘nþch vlastnþch zdrojov.
The Member States must keep `A accounts' (58) for the registration of paid and/or guaranteed customs debts, and `B accounts' for the registration of either unpaid or not guaranteed debts (or debts guaranteed but contested).
Musia vies╃ ‡ú┘-tovnîctvo Aƒ58 na ú┘ely evidencie uhradenþch a/alebo zaru┘enþch colnþch dlhov a ‡ú┘tov- nîctvo Bƒ na ú┘ely evidencie dlhov, ktorê neboli zîskanê ani zaru┘enê (alebo zâruk, ktorê sú vùak spornê).
Many debts appearing in the B accounts are the result of fraud or irregularities detected.
Vä┘ùina dlhov zapîsanþch v ú┘tovnîctve B je vþsledkom zistenþch podvo-dov alebo nezrovnalostî.
A report (59) analysed 17 cases of recovery which were the subject of previous mutual as-sistance communications from OLAF, involved several Member States and had a financial impact of over EUR 1 million on the Community budget.
Sprâva59analyzovala 17 prîpadov vymâhania, ktorê boli predmetom oznâmenia v râmci vzâjomnej pomoci OLAF a ktorê sa vùetky tþkali nieko┱kþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtov a predstavo-vali stratu na rozpo┘te Spolo┘enstva viac ako 1 milión eur.
The sample involved different types of asset and fraud mechanisms (false customs values, false prices and false declara-tions of origin).
Vybranê prîpady sa tþkali rôz- neho tovaru a vz╃ahovali sa na ne rôzne mechanizmy podvodu (machinâcie s hodnotou preclenêho tovaru, sfalùovanê ceny a nepravdivê vyhlâsenia o pôvode tovaru).
The Commission observed a steady improvement in the effective rate of debt recovery (2 % for the sample examined in 1994, 12 % in 1998 and 15 % in 2003).
Komisia ┛a-lej skonùtatovala neustâle zlepùovanie v oblasti skuto┘nej miery úspeùnosti vymâhania dl-hov (2 % zo skúmanej vzorky v roku 1994, 12 % v roku 1998 a 15 % v roku 2003).
Member States are also responsible for entering all cases of detected fraud and irregularities in the OWNRES database if they have a potential financial impact of traditional own resources over EUR 10 000.
ﾚlenskê ùtâty sú zodpovednê aj za zapisovanie informâciî o vùetkþch zistenþch prîpadoch podvodov a nezrovnalostî do databâzy ‡OWNRESƒ, ktorê predstavujú potenciâlnu finan┘-nú ujmu na tradi┘nþch vlastnþch zdrojoch viac ako 10 000 eur.
Because it is to be expected that customs debts over EUR 10 000 will appear not only in OWNRES but also in the B accounts, the Commission, in 2003, compared the two.
Ke┛Še tieto prîpady sa musia za normâlnych okolnostî vykazova╃ aj v ‡ú┘tovnîctve Bƒ, Komisia uskuto┘nila po-rovnanie.
The results of this comparison were not very satisfactory.
Vþsledky sú neuspokojivê.
When the Commission did the exercise in 2004 significant improvements became evident.
Ke┛ tento krok zopakovala v roku 2004, zistili sa vþ-raznê zlepùenia.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2028/2004 (60) obliges Member States to treat as irrecovera-ble amounts of traditional own resources in excess of EUR 50 000 which have not been recovered within five years from the request for payment became definitively enforceable.
Nariadenie (ES, Euratom) 2028/200460ukladâ ┘lenskþm ùtâtom povinnos╃ pristupova╃ k sumâm tradi┘nþch vlastnþch zdrojov, ktorê prevyùujú 50 000 eur a ktorê neboli navrâte-nê do piatich rokov od dâtumu, ke┛ sa Šiados╃ o platbu stala s kone┘nou platnos╃ou vyko-nate┱nou, ako k nevymâhate┱nþm poh┱adâvkam.
This means that all such cases (including very difficult to recover debts arising from fraud and irregularities) must be presented to the Commission for evaluation.
To vùak znamenâ, Še tieto prîpady (vrâta-ne dlhov, ktorê sa vymâhajú len ve┱mi o b t i a Š n e a sú vþsledkom podvodov a nezrovnalostî) musia by╃ pre d l o Š e n ê Komisii na vyhodnotenie.
Direct expenditure
Priame vþdavky
The new financial regulation
Novê nariadenie o rozpo┡tovþch pravidlâch
The new financial regulation (61) significantly improves the effectiveness of recovery of direct expenditure.
Novê nariadenie o rozpo┘tovþch pravidlâch61zna┘ne zlepùuje ú┘innos╃ vymâhania poh┱a-dâvok v oblasti priamych vþdavkov.