natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For 49 projects, those contacts took place during the project.
V rèmci 49 projektov boli tieto kontakty nadviazanï poｲas projektu. V 9 projektoch sa konali poｲas a po projekte a v 2 projektoch sa konali po ukonｲenó projektu.
Close contacts occurred within the following categories.
Blózke kontakty sa vy-skytli v nasledovn̅ch kategùrièch:
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s A . e c t e d w o mffe n : 9 p r o j e c t s Y o u n g people: 8 p r o j e c t s C h i l d r e n : 8 projects
Cieﾋovï skupiny‡ Uｲitelia: 17 projektov‡ Polócia a socièlni pracovnóci: 13 projektov ka™d̅
Target groups‡ Teachers: 17 projects‡ Police and social workers: 13 projects each‡ Educational sta.(educators,parents):12projects
Koncovó prójemcovia‡ Dotknutï ™eny: 9 projektov‡ Mlède™: 8 projektov‡ Deti: 8 projektov
‡ Local/national authorities, Members of Parliaments, deputies: 12 projects
‡ Vzdelèvacó personèl (þkolitelia, rodiｲia): 12 projektov
End-bene«ciariesingeneral:5 projects.
‡ Koncovó u™óvatelia vþeobecne: 5 projektov.
‡ Medical sta.,psychologists:8projects‡ NGOs: 8 projects‡ EU authorities, MEPs, politicians: 12 projects‡ Judicial sta.:4projects
‡ Orgèny Eà, ｲlenovia Eurùpskeho parlamentu, politici: 12 projektov
‡ Other: 14 projects (associations, charities, journalists, practitioners, volunteers, rapporteur for United Nations, experts, trade unions, employers' organisations, representatives of religious communities).
‡ Inï: 14 projektov (asociècie, charity, ™urnalisti, lekèri, dobrovoﾋnóci, spravodajcovia OSN, odbornóci, odborèri, zamestnèvateﾋskï organizècie, predstavitelia nèbo™ensk̅ch spoloｲenstiev).
The European label helped some partners to get in close contact with political authorities, as illustrated below.
Ako mú™eme vidieﾝ dole, znaｲka ¶eurùpskostiƒ pomohla niektor̅m partnerom nadviazaﾝ blóz-ky kontakt s politick̅mi orgènmi:
Having the EU as a political backbone opened doors that had been closed for a long time.
Fungovanie Eà ako politickej chrbtice otvorilo dvere, ktorï boli dlho zatvorenï.
Net-works working in those «eldstookthephenomenonofhatecrimesagainstlesbianwomenandof domestic violence more seriously.
Spoluprèca na tomto poli vytvorila fenomïn, ™e sa nenèvisﾝ voｲi kriminalite pèchanej na lesbick̅ch ™enèch a domècemu nèsiliu bral vè™nejþie.
Still it was di/culttoovercomethe`friendly'listeningandgetting them into action.
Stèle vþak bolo ﾝa™kï prekonaﾝ ¶priateﾋskïƒ naｲÿvanie a na-hradiﾝ ho ｲinmi. Avþak nakoniec poｲÿvali.
Dissemination activities were mainly carried out during the project.
Ako mú™eme vidieﾝ, rozþirujÿce aktivity uvedenï ni™þie sa konali hlavne poｲas projektu.
Some 88 % of the project coordinators were keen to continue the project after its end but only 11 % received addi-tional funds for dissemination, as illustrated below.
Asi 88 % koordinètorov projektu malo zèujem pokraｲovaﾝ v projekte po jeho ukonｲenó, ale iba 11 % dostalo ｵalþie prostriedky na rozþirovanie:
Grant from Leeds Health Action Zone Community for free dissemination of the video pack to all Leeds primary and secondary schools after the contractual period.
Grant od Leeds Health Action Zone Community na bezplatnï þórenie videonahrèvok do vþetk̅ch zèkladn̅ch a stredn̅ch þkúl v Leedsi po skonｲenó zmluvnïho obdobia.
The Catholic Church funded the production of 2 000 copies of our report in book form.
Katolócka cirkev «nancovalav̅robu2000v̅tlaｲkovnaþejsprèvyvkni™nejpodobe.
Getting funds to continue the Daphne projects after closure is critical.
Zóskanie « n a n c o v a n i a n a p o k r a ｲ o v a n i ep r o j e k t o v D a p h n ep o i c h u k o n ｲ e n ó j e r o z h o d u j ÿ c e .
Daphne funding al-lowed great things to start but there is a general lack of possibilities for follow-up to ensure continuity of project activities as both the EC and local governments refuse to take them in charge.
F i n a n c o v a n i e prostrednóctvom Daphne umo™nilo þtart veﾋk̅ch podujató, ale je tu veﾋk̅ nedo-statok mo™nostó pre nadvêzujÿcu ｲinnosﾝ, aby sa zabezpeｲila kontinuita projektov̅ch aktivót: Eurùpske spoloｲenstvo ako aj lokèlne vlèdy odmietajÿ za ne prevziaﾝ zodpovednosﾝ.
For example, updating a website with information at European level or maintaining a European network of local crisis centres takes time and money.
Napróklad aktualizècia webovej strènky s informèciami na eurùpskej ÿrovni alebo udr™iavanie eurùpskej siete miestnych krózov̅ch centier si vy™aduje ｲas a peniaze.
Often, local governments refuse to fund such follow-up activity because it is not a local project.
Lokèlne vlèdy ｲasto odmietajÿ « n a n c o v a ﾝ t a k ÿ t o ｲ i n n o s ﾝ , p r e t o ™ e t o n i e j e l o k è l n y p r o j e k t .
On the EC side, Daphne is the only EC programme for such actions but it does not consider continuing to fund ex-penses linked to the updating of a website or the maintaining of a network.
Z o s t r a n y E u r ù p s k e j k o m i s i e j e D a p h n e jedin̅m programom ES s takouto ｲinnosﾝou, ale neuva™uje o ｵalþom «nancovanónèkladov spojen̅ch s aktualizèciou webov̅ch strènok alebo ÿdr™bou siete.
The results of the Daphne experience ing training modules for trainers on the prevention of violence in children's behaviour, elaborat-ing a research agenda for academics on female genital mutilation, and many others.
V̅sledky zahﾕﾏajÿ vytvorenie Eurùpskej char-ty operètorov detsk̅ch liniek pomoci, mapujÿcej situèciu v Eurùpe t̅kajÿcu sa znèsilnenó a mul-tiagentÿrny trïningov̅ program pracujÿci s pèchateﾋmi domèceho nèsilia, zostavovanie trï-ningov̅ch modulov pre lektorov prevencie proti nèsiliu v detskom sprèvanó, v̅voj a v̅skum agendy pre akademickÿ verejnosﾝ ohﾋadom mrzaｲenia ™ensk̅ch genitèlió a veﾋa in̅ch.
Some project methods were innovative, such as a pilot training module based on a drama workshop for the self-empowerment of girls and preventing sexual abuse, and a training resource pack to be used within the workplace to increase awareness of domestic violence.
Niektorï projektovï metùdy boli inovaｲnï, ako napróklad pilotn̅ trïningov̅ modul zalo™en̅ na drama-tick̅ch workshopoch pre sebaposilnenie dievｲat a preventóvne púsobiaci proti sexuèlnemu zne-u™óvaniu, a trïningovïmu balóｲku pre pou™itie na pracovisku zameranïmu na zv̅þenie pove-domia o domècom nèsiló.
The multiplier ef-fects of new methodologies, multi-agency cooperation, training programmes, audiovisual and information technology materials and other outcomes/products of some of the projects are far-reaching and impressive.
Znèsoben̅ ÿｲinok nov̅ch metodók, medziagentÿrna spoluprèca, trïningovï programy, audiovizuèlne materièly a materièly vyu™óvajÿce informaｲnï technolùgie a inï v̅stupy/v̅sledky z niektor̅ch projektov sÿ púsobivï a ｵalekosiahle.
The «nalevaluationalsostudiedtheimpactsoftheprogramme.Theyarede«nedashumanand social changes brought about by Daphne or one of its projects.
V zèvereｲnom hodnotenó sa skÿmali i vplyvy programu, ktorï de«nujemeakohumènneaso-cièlne zmeny spúsobenï programom Daphne alebo niektor̅m z jeho projektov.
These impacts were measured along three axes: impacts on the partners, on the target groups and on the end-bene«ciaries.Furthermore,thefactorsa.ecting,positivelyornegatively,theseimpactswere identi«edinordertoimprovetheunderstandingofthemechanismsleadingtoimpact.
Tieto vplyvy sa posudzovali na troch ÿrovniach: vplyv na partnerov, cieﾋovï skupiny a koneｲ-n̅ch prójemcov. Navyþe, faktory, ktorï sa podieﾋajÿ › ｲi u™ negatóvnou alebo pozitóvnou for-mou › na vzniku t̅chto vplyvov, boli identi«kovanïvzèujmelepþiehopochopeniamecha-nizmov vedÿcich k vytvoreniu vplyvu.
Impacts on partners
Vplyv na partnerov
The graph below presents the six categories of impact on partners as experienced by them.
Ni™þie uveden̅ graf znèzorﾏuje þesﾝ kategùrió vplyvov na partnerov, tak ako ich vnómali oni sami.
Improved expertise
Zv̅þenie odbornosti
Adoption of good practices
Zv̅þenie dúveryhodnosti a dosahu
Improved credibility and outreach
Zv̅þenie kapacity siete
Access to additional funding
Zmena povahy prèce
Nearly all the projects (97 %) have impacts on the partners.
Takmer u vþetk̅ch projektov (97 %) bol zaznamenan̅ vplyv na partnerov.
`Improved expertise' is linked to gains in understanding or new understanding of the issue of vio-lence, learning from the experience of other partners and target groups, improved skills/perform-ance and increased knowledge of how an issue is addressed across Europe.
¶Zv̅þenie odbornostiƒ sa prejavuje lepþóm chèpanóm ｲi nov̅m spúsobom vnómania otèzok nèsilia, a to vｵaka skÿsenostiam ostatn̅ch partnerov a cieﾋov̅ch skupón, zv̅þeniu kvali«kè-cie/zlepþeniu v̅konnosti a vêｲþej informovanosti o spúsoboch rieþenia tohto problïmu v Eu-rùpe.
Improved expertise must be linked to the transnational character of the partnerships, allowing partners to work and exchange knowledge with complementary partners with a high level of expertise.
Sÿvisó s medzinèrodnou povahou partnerstiev, ktorè umo™ﾏuje spoluprècu a v̅menu informèció s partnermi na vysokej odbornej ÿrovni.
For 76 % of the partners, it was the « r s t t i mffe t h e y p a r t i c i p a t e d i n a D a p h n e p r o j e c t : t h i s i s a h i g hp e r c e n t a g e o f ` n e w cffo mffe r s ' , illustrating the pioneering role of Daphne for the partners concerned.
Pre 76 % partnerov to bola prvè ÿｲasﾝ na projekte Daphne: tento poｲet ¶novèｲikovƒ je veﾋmi vysok̅, ｲo je dúkazom toho, ™e ｲo sa t̅ka partnerov, je Daphne priekopnóckym programom.
`Adoption of good practices' refers to cases where, due to the project, partners acted di.er-ently in their work, became more professional and adapted good practices to their own use.
‡ partneri mú™u jednoduchþie kontaktovaﾝ ostatn̅ch partnerov;‡ partneri mú™u byﾝ ﾋahþie kontaktovanó;‡ po ukonｲenó projektu je mo™nosﾝ ich vzèjomnej spoluprèce vyþþia.
`Change of the nature of work' refers typically to projects with a research component, where the results of the project overturn the previous conception of work.
¶Zmena povahy prèceƒ sa t̅ka projektov zahﾕﾏajÿcich v̅skum, ktorï zmenili predchèdzajÿcu koncepciu prèce.
After the project, partners operate di.erentlyduetonewinformationandunderstandingcomingfromtheproject.
Po skonｲenó projektu zaｲnÿ partneri vｵaka nov̅m informècièm zóskan̅m poｲas projektu pou™óvaﾝ inï pracovnï postupy.
Most mentioned
Najviac uvèdzanï
Resources/means allocated to the project: 10 %
Zdroje/prostriedky pridelenï projektu: 10 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 69 %
Odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov projektu a ich komplementarita: 69 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 4 %
Odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov a ich komplementarita: 4 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 49 %
Medzinèrodn̅ rozsah partnerstva: 49 %
Quality of the outputs: 42 %
Kvalita v̅stupov: 42 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 3 %
Medzinèrodn̅ rozsah partnerstva: 1 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 24 %
Zdroje/prostriedky pridelenï projektu: 24 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:15%
Politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenie: 1 %
Other (project duration; for small NGOs, constraints linked to a European project): 1 %
Politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenie: 12 %
Less mentioned
Menej uvèdzanï
The «rsttwocontributingfactorsclearlyemphasisetheneedforacarefullydesignedpartner-ship.
Prvï dva prispievajÿce faktory jasne zdúrazﾏujÿ potrebu starostlivo naplènovanïho partner-stva.
This is con«rmedbytheimportancegiventothelevelofexpertiseofthesepartnersalsoin the limiting factors.
Svedｲó o tom i dúle™itosﾝ, ktorè bola prisÿdenè odbornej ÿrovni partnerov i v limitujÿcich faktoroch.
Therefore this point seems crucial and will be regularly recalled by the Commission in its guidelines: good partnership with appropriate expertise favours the project's achievements but an ill-designed partnership penalises it.
Preto sa tento bod javó ako kﾋÿｲov̅ a Komisia ho bude vo svojich direktóvach spo-mónaﾝ: kvalitnï partnerstvo s adekvètnou odbornosﾝou napomèha splneniu projektu, no ne-vhodnï partnerstvo projektu þkodó.
In addition, 10 % of the quotations for limiting factors mention quite logically that the resources allocated to the project are important.
V 10 % uveden̅ch limitujÿcich faktorov sa celkom logic-ky spomóna dúle™itosﾝ zdrojov, ktorï budÿ projektu pridelenï.
Impacts on target groups
Vplyv na cieﾋovï skupiny
A total of 93 % of the projects present an impact on the target groups.
Pri 93 % projektov bol zaznamenan̅ vplyv na cieﾋovï skupiny.
Changed behaviour regarding protection from violence
Zmena sprèvania vo vzﾝahu k ochrane pred nèsilóm
More willingness/capacity to cooperate
Vêｲþia ochota/mo™nosﾝ spoluprèce
`Increased awareness of issues of violence' results from proper dissemination activities (ma-terials distributed and events organised) towards members of the target groups.
¶Zv̅þenè informovanosﾝ o nèsilóƒ je v̅sledkom sprèvnych propagaｲn̅ch aktivót (distribÿcia materièlov a organizovanie podujató) namieren̅ch na ｲlenov cieﾋov̅ch skupón.
The impact `more willingness/capacity to cooperate' refers to a better implementation of the outputs of the project because the target groups:
Vplyv ¶vêｲþia ochota/mo™nosﾝ spoluprèceƒ sa t̅ka lepþej implementècie v̅stupov projektu, a to z dúvodu, ™e cieﾋovï skupiny:
‡ are more interested in working together;
‡ sa viac zaujómajÿ o vzèjomnÿ spoluprècu;
The impact `increased expertise' refers to a better understanding or a new understanding of the issue of violence, exchange of experience and practices with partners and other target groups leading to a more integrated approach on the issue of violence and to an increased knowledge of activities in the sector across Europe.
Vplyv ¶lepþia odbornosﾝƒ hovoró o lepþom ｲi inom spúsobe vnómania otèzok nèsilia, vzèjomnej v̅mene skÿsenostó a metùd medzi partnermi a ostatn̅mi cieﾋov̅mi skupinami, v dúsledku ｲoho sa vytvoril integrovanejþó próstup k otèzkam nèsilia a zlepþila informovanosﾝ o jednotli-v̅ch aktivitèch v tomto sektore v rèmci Eurùpy.
`Changed behaviour regarding prevention from violence' mostly corresponds to an intention to better focus on actions of prevention, in two ways:
¶Zmena sprèvania vo vzﾝahu k prevencii nèsiliaƒ zvêｲþa koreþponduje s cieﾋom zameraﾝ sa viac na prevenciu, a to dvoma nasledovn̅mi spúsobmi:
‡ target groups do more preventing actions than before;
‡ viac preventóvnych opatrenó realizovan̅ch cieﾋov̅mi skupinami;
‡ target groups have changed their way of working because they know the problem better and are consequently more able to address it.
‡ zmena spúsobu prèce cieﾋov̅ch skupón z dúvodu lepþieho poznania problematiky a vêｲþej schopnosti jej rieþenia.
The drive is more focused on prevention.
Na prevenciu sa kladie vêｲþó dúraz.
They use preventing instead of reporting, counselling or use of social circles.
Namiesto hlèsenó, prèvneho poradenstva a socièlnych opatrenó sa robó prevencia.
This is typi-cally the case of projects with a research component that has allowed a deeper understand-ing of prevention.
Plató to hlavne pre tie projekty, ktorï uskutoｲnili v̅skum, vｵaka ktorïmu prevenciu hlbþie pochopili.
Resources/means allocated to the project: 13 %
Zdroje/prostriedky pridelenï projektu: 13 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 50 %
Odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov projektu a ich komplementarita: 50 %
Quality of the outputs: 47 %
Kvalita v̅stupov: 47 %
Political interest/visibility: 3 %
Politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenie: 3 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 26 %
Medzinèrodn̅ rozsah partnerstva: 26 %
Quality of the outputs: 1 %
Kvalita v̅stupov: 1 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 25 %
Zdroje/prostriedky pridelenï projektu: 25 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 1 %
Odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov projektu a ich komplementarita: 1 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 1 %
Medzinèrodn̅ rozsah partnerstva: 1 %
Political interest/visibility: 20 %
Politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenie: 20 %
Here again, there is an important factor that can both favour or penalise the project: this is the degree of involvement of representatives of the target groups.
Opêﾝ sa tu objavuje dúle™it̅ faktor, ktor̅ mú™e napomúcﾝ splneniu projektu alebo mu i uþko-diﾝ. Je to miera zaanga™ovanosti predstaviteﾋov cieﾋov̅ch skupón.
There is room for another piece of advice to future projects: an adequate involvement of the target groups, be it during design, implementation or dissemination phases. `Quality of the output' is another important factor contributing to a good impact.
Autorom budÿcich projektov je urｲenï nasledovnï odporÿｲanie: cieﾋovï skupiny treba do projektu v adekvètnej miere zaanga™ovaﾝ, ｲi u™ poｲas jeho própravy, implementècie ｲi propagècie. Salþóm dúle™it̅m fak-torom, ktor̅ prispieva k vytvoreniu pozitóvneho vplyvu je ¶kvalita v̅stupovƒ.
Four projects out of «ve(79%)haveimpactsonend-bene«ciaries.Thefollowinggraphillus-trates the frequencies of the ways these bene«ciariesarea.ected.
U þtyroch projektov z piatich (79 %) bol zaznamenan̅ vplyv na koneｲn̅ch prójemcov. Nasle-dovn̅ graf ilustruje frekvenciu spúsobov ovplyvnenia koneｲn̅ch prójemcov.
Better protection
Lepþie pochopenie vlastnej situècie
Improved means of tackling their situations
Lepþia schopnosﾝ rieþenia vlastnej situècie
Promoting their inclusion in society
Zv̅þenie kvali«kècie
`Increased awareness' is the result of dissemination activities, contacts with representatives of target groups and/or direct involvement in partnerships.
¶Lepþie pochopenie vlastnej situècieƒ je v̅sledkom propagaｲn̅ch aktivót, kontaktov s pred-staviteﾋmi cieﾋov̅ch skupón a/alebo priamej zaanga™ovanosti do partnerstiev.
In some projects, end-bene«ciar-ies did not even know before the project about their rights and existing services, as illustrated below.
Ako si mú™eme preｲótaﾝ ｵalej, v niektor̅ch projektoch koneｲnó prójemcovia ani nepoznali svoje prèva a neve-deli o existujÿcich slu™bèch:
For many it was the «rsttimetheyhad information on the issue of violence against children.
Pre mnoh̅ch to boli vúbec prvï informècie o problematike nèsilia voｲi deﾝom.
There has been a broad dissemination of the SOS helpline.
Veﾋk̅ dúraz sa klèdol na propagèciu linky SOS.
In the pilot phase, there were six cases of abuse revealed in « v e a r e a s o f T h e s - s a l o n i k i .
V pilotnej fèze bolo v piatich oblastiach Solÿna 6 própadov t̅rania.
The impact `Improved access to assistance' covers cases in which end-bene«ciariesreachmembers of the target groups better (also linked to the fact that target groups are more ac-cessible and more able to identify cases of violence) or are more able to access assistance (they know better who to call).
Vplyv ¶lepþó próstup k pomociƒ sa t̅ka própadov lepþieho próstupu koneｲn̅ch prójemcov k ｲle-nom cieﾋov̅ch skupón (ｲo tie™ sÿvisó s faktom, ™e cieﾋovï skupiny sÿ próstupnejþie a dokè™u lepþie identi«kovaﾝprópadynèsilia)alebozlepþeniaichschopnostivyhﾋadaﾝpomoc(lepþievedia, komu majÿ zavolaﾝ).
Such an impact is more frequent in projects coordinated by an NGO than in projects coordinated by any other type of organisation: 67 % compared with 39 % respectively.
Tento vplyv je ｲastejþó v projektoch koordinovan̅ch MVO ako v projektoch koordinovan̅ch organizèciou inïho typu: 67 % v porovnanó s 39 %.
In fact, NGOs play an important role in guiding end-bene«ciariestowardsade-quate assistance services and in interfacing with providers of services and end-bene«ciar-ies.
MVO zohrè-vajÿ v̅znamnÿ ÿlohu v informovanó koneｲn̅ch prójemcov o adekvètnych asistenｲn̅ch slu™-bèch a v zabezpeｲovanó vzèjomnej komunikècie medzi poskytovateﾋmi slu™ieb a koneｲn̅mi prójemcami.
The impact `Improved means of tackling their situations' refers to the case when a potential victim is better positioned to address his/her own situation.
Vplyv ¶lepþia schopnosﾝ rieþenia vlastnej situècieƒ sa t̅ka zlepþenia pozócie potencièlnej obe-te pri rieþenó vlastn̅ch problïmov. Tèto lepþia pozócia je dúsledkom:
‡ better tools, e.g. a contact telephone number;
‡ kvalitnejþóch prostriedkov, ak̅m je napr. telefùnne ｲóslo;
‡ better knowledge: they understand their situation and know other people who are in the same situation;
‡ lepþej informovanosti: lepþie chèpu svoju situèciu a poznajÿ ｵalþóch ﾋudó v rovnakej situè-cii;
‡ increased con«dence:theyhavethecon«dencetoaddresstheirproblem.
‡ zv̅þenie sebadúvery: sÿ odhodlanó svoj problïm rieþiﾝ.
Some illustrative cases are given below.
Na ilustrèciu uvèdzame niekoﾋko própadov:
We put a special search tool on the website to encourage people to get information on a low-key basis, without having to talk to anyone.
Na webovÿ strènku sme umiestnili þpecièlny vyhﾋadèvaｲ, aby sme nabèdali ﾋudó k individuèl-nemu vyhﾋadèvaniu informèció bez nutnosti niekoho kontaktovaﾝ.
A s i g n i « c a n t r e po r t e d i m p a c t b y n e t w o r k e d N G O s i s t h a t b e n e « c i a r i e s k nffo w m o r e o f t e n t h a nbef o r e this project who to call for help, the directory providing useful contact points across Europe.
V̅znamn̅m v̅sledkom siete MVO je fakt, ™e prójemcovia sÿ vｵaka projektu informovanó o tom, kde majÿ vyhﾋadaﾝ pomoc, preto™e v telefùnnom zozname sÿ uvedenï u™itoｲnï kontakty v rèm-ci celej Eurùpy.
There's a joined-up approach to people who have su.eredfromabuse.Theynowgetthesameservice from the national health service and police and each understands what the other is doing.
Voｲi zneu™óvan̅m ﾋuｵom sa vytvoril spoloｲn̅ próstup. V sÿｲasnosti im þtètna zdravotnè starost-livosﾝ a polócia poskytujÿ rovnakï slu™by a obe strany sÿ informovanï o vzèjomnej ｲinnosti.
There is an increase of services in the region and these are integrated services to families.
V oblasti bol zaznamenan̅ nèrast poｲtu organizèció, ktorï poskytujÿ rodinèm integrovanï slu™-by.
This began in 2000 with one headquarters and now there are several.
V roku 2000 ich zaｲala poskytovaﾝ jedna centrèla a v sÿｲasnosti ich je u™ niekoﾋko.
The impact on end-bene«ciariesismoreindirectthantheimpactontargetgroups,becausethey are less involved in the process.
Vplyv na koneｲn̅ch prójemcov nie je tak̅ priamy ako vplyv na cieﾋovï skupiny, preto™e sÿ do celïho procesu menej zaanga™ovanó.
End-bene«ciariesarerecipientsofthecareandservicesof the partners and target groups.
Sÿ to recipienti starostlivosti a slu™ieb partnerov a cie-ﾋov̅ch skupón.
They bene«tthroughtheirenhancedunderstanding,ca-pacity, performance and cooperation.
Pre nich je prónosom lepþie pochopenie problematiky, zlepþenie vlastn̅ch schopnostó, mo™nosﾝ konaﾝ a spolupracovaﾝ.
The more the representatives of target groups are lead-ers, the larger the expected impact.
Póm vêｲþie vodcovskï schopnosti majÿ predsta-vitelia cieﾋov̅ch skupón, t̅m v̅raznejþó je oｲakèvan̅ vplyv.
In fact, some projects were successful in reaching com-munity leaders (e.g. FGM stakeholders) or decision-makers (e.g. trade unions) and registered substantial impact on end-bene«ciariesasillustratedbelow.
Niektorï projekty ÿspeþne oslo-vili lódrov spoloｲnosti (napr. akcionèrov FGM) ｲi verejn̅ch ｲiniteﾋov (napr. odborovï organizè-cie) a zaznamenali v̅znamn̅ vplyv na koneｲn̅ch prójemcov, o ｲom svedｲia i nasledovnï pró-klady:
The project was explained in general meetings of the CCOO trade union in Spain so that sexual harassment has formed part of union negotiations and agreements.
Projekt sa rozoberal poｲas valn̅ch zhroma™denó odborovïho zvêzu CCOO v Þpanielsku a sexu-èlne obﾝa™ovanie sa v dúsledku toho stalo sÿｲasﾝou vyjednèvanó a dohúd odborov.
Workers now get a good service and union representatives now have negotiated clauses to support prevention from sexual harassment.
Zamestnan-com sÿ v sÿｲasnosti poskytovanï kvalitnï slu™by a zèstupcovia odborov dohodli prijatie klauzÿl v zèujme prevencie sexuèlneho obﾝa™ovania.
During the project, partners discussed four times with the head of the police of the city of Frank-furt. The aim was to change the attitude of police and see hate crimes against lesbian women as a phenomenon they have to deal with.
Poｲas projektu sa partneri þtyrikrèt stretli s vedÿcim polócie vo Frankfurte s cieﾋom zmeniﾝ postoj polócie ohﾋadom nenèvisti a nèsilia voｲi lesbiｲkèm a zaｲaﾝ v tomto smere konaﾝ.
As a result, the Frankfurt police has been trained.
V̅sledkom je organizovanie þkolenó pre frankfurtsk̅ch policajtov.
Quality of the outputs: 54 %
Kvalita v̅stupov: 54 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:39%
Odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov projektu a ich komplementarita: 44 %