natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
› for urgent reasons, occasioned by serious and unforeseeable circumstances relating to the protection of public health or safety, the protection of animals or the preservation of plants and, for rules on services, also for public policy, notably the pro-tection of minors, a Member State is obliged to prepare techni-cal regulations in a very short space of time in order to enact and introduce them immediately without any consultations be-ing possible or
Tèto þpecièlna a menej striktnè forma klauzuly o naliehavosti je zabezpeｲenè v̅luｲne v oblasti «nanｲn̅chslu™iebinformaｲnejspoloｲnostikvúliurｲi-t̅m rizikèm a po™iadavkèm, ktorï sÿ pre tento sektor þpeci«ckï.
› for urgent reasons occasioned by serious circumstances relat-ing to the protection of the security and the integrity of the «-nancial system, notably the protection of depositors, investors and insured persons, a Member State is obliged to enact and implement rules on «nancialservicesimmediately.
› zo sÿrnych dúvodov, spúsoben̅ch vè™nymi a nepredvódateﾋn̅-mi okolnosﾝami t̅kajÿcimi sa ochrany verejnïho zdravia alebo bezpeｲnosti, ochrany zvierat alebo zachovania rastlón a pre pravidlè t̅kajÿce sa slu™ieb, ako aj verejnej politiky, najmê ochrany malolet̅ch, je ｲlensk̅ þtèt povinn̅ pripraviﾝ technickï predpisy vo veﾋmi krètkom ｲasovom obdobó kvúli ich okam™itï-mu uzèkoneniu a zaｲleneniu bez ak̅chkoﾋvek mo™n̅ch konzul-tèció, alebo
In the communication referred to in Article 8, the Member State shall give reasons for the urgency of the measures taken. The Commission shall give its views on the communication as soon as possible.
Tieto v̅nimoｲnï okolnosti neoslobodzujÿ ｲlensk̅ þtèt od po-vinnosti informovaﾝ Komisiu o plènovan̅ch opatreniach a jas-ne odúvodniﾝ svoju po™iadavku t̅kajÿcu sa naliehavosti v ｲase oznamovania textu.
It shall take appropriate action in cases where improper use is made of this procedure. The European Parliament shall be kept informed by the Commission.
Komisia musó zhodnotiﾝ, ｲi je pou™óvanie postupu t̅kajÿceho sa naliehavosti odúvodnenï a ｲo najskúr poskytne svoje stanoviskè k oznèmeniu.
Since blockage postpones the adoption of national legislation without precise knowledge of the length of the process which will lead to the « n a l a p p r o v a l o f C o m mstu n i t y l effg i s l a t i o n , t h e C o m m i s s i o n uses this instrument with caution.
› zo sÿrnych dúvodov spúsoben̅ch vè™nymi okolnosﾝami t̅kajÿ-cimi sa ochrany bezpeｲnosti a integrity «nanｲnïhosystïmu,najmê ochrany deponentov, investorov a poisten̅ch osúb, je ｲlensk̅ þtèt povinn̅ okam™ite uzèkoniﾝ a implementovaﾝ pra-vidlè vzﾝahujÿce sa na «nanｲnïslu™by.
It is logical that, where Community action which is envisaged or in progress does not produce a result, the standstill obliga-tions imposed by paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) should lapse in or-der to allow the Member States to complete the postponed
V praxi Komisia vykonèva veﾋmi dúkladnÿ anal̅zu uveden̅ch dúvodov na zèklade dvoch kritïrió obsiahnut̅ch v tomto odse-ku: vè™nosﾝ situècie a (okrem «nanｲn̅chslu™ieb)jejnepredvó-dateﾋn̅ charakter.
This paragraph provides that the standstill periods are not ap-plicable when a Member State, in order to respond to an urgent and unforeseeable situation such as, for example, a natural dis-aster (the need to protect people, the atmosphere, soil or wa-ter), an epidemic, an animal epidemic, etc., is obliged to pre-
Ak Komisia zvè™i, ™e tieto kritïriè nie sÿ splnenï, spochybnó dú-vody naliehavosti; v opaｲnom própade Komisia mú™e akcepto-
Procedure established by the Single European Act in 1986 and then introduced as Article 189c of the EC Treaty by the Maastricht Treaty.
Plensk̅ þtèt poskytne v oznèmenó uvedenom v ｲlènku 8 dúvody, ktorï zaruｲujÿ urgentn̅ charakter prijat̅ch opatrenó.
(Today Article 252).Article 189b, introduced into the EC Treaty by the Maastricht Treaty.
Prijme vhodnï opatrenia v própadoch, keｵ je tento postup nenèle™ite vyu™óvan̅.
(Today Article 251).
Komisia informuje Eurùpsky parlament.
pare technical regulations for immediate introduction, without having time to consult the Commission and the other Member States beforehand.
Obmedzenia tejto v̅nimky sÿ najlepþie ilustrovanï odkazom na zèkladn̅ cieﾋ smernice, ktor̅m je eliminècia neodúvodne-n̅ch prekè™ok obchodu.
In the event of the adoption of measures whose urgency has been disputed, without observance of the standstill period, the Commission can launch the infringement procedure re-ferred to in Article 226 of the Treaty against the Member State concerned for breach of the obligations provided by the Di-rective.
V própade prijatia opatrenó, ktor̅ch naliehavosﾝ bola spochyb-nenè, bez dodr™ania obdobia preruþenia prèc na technickom predpise, mú™e Komisia zaｲaﾝ konanie o poruþenó, uvedenï v ｲlènku 226 Zmluvy, voｲi prósluþnïmu ｲlenskïmu þtètu za po-ruþenie povinnostó uveden̅ch v smernici.
Exceptions to the obligation to notify or observe standstill periods
V̅nimky z povinnosti oznèmiﾝ alebo dodr™aﾝ obdobia preru-þenia prèc na technickom predpise
Concerning rules on services, Member States can invoke the urgency clause also for urgent reasons, occasioned by serious and unforeseeable circumstances relating to public policy, no-tably the protection of minors. This new concept re‹ectsthespecial importance attached by the Community legislator to the protection of minors in the context of the new services.
Toto odúvodnenie je rovnakï, pokiaﾋ ide o medzinèrodnï do-hody: keｵ takèto dohoda obsahuje presnï ustanovenia a ne-existuje priestor pre odliþnosﾝ, prijatie jednotnïho sÿboru pra-vidiel dvadsiatimi piatimi ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi v princópe nemè za nèsledok prekè™ky obchodu.
The urgency clause may also be invoked, where rules relating to «nancialservicesareconcerned,forurgentreasonsoccasionedby serious circumstances relating to the protection of the secu-rity and the integrity of the «nancialsystem,notablytheprotec-tion of depositors, investors and insured persons.
Tento ｲlènok dopﾊﾏa ｲlènky 8 a 9 smernice uvedenóm þtatutèr-nych v̅nimiek z povinnosti oznèmiﾝ nèvrh nèrodnïho technic-kïho predpisu.
This special and less strict form of urgency clause is provided for exclusively in the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i e t y « n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s o n a c c o u n t o f certain risks and requirements speci«ctothissector.
Uvèdza tie™ urｲitï v̅nimky z povinnosti dodr™aﾝ obdobia preruþenia prèc na technickom predpise stanoven̅mi v ｲlènku 9.
Articles 8 and 9 shall not apply to those laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States or voluntary agreements by means of which Member States:
Plènky 8 a 9 sa nevzﾝahujÿ na tieto zèkony, nariadenia a admi-nistratóvne ustanovenia ｲlensk̅ch þtètov alebo dobrovoﾋnï doho-dy, prostrednóctvom ktor̅ch ｲlenskï þtèty:
› comply with binding Community acts which result in the adop-tion of technical speci«cationsorrulesonservices;
Niekoﾋko rozsudkov objasnilo rozsah v̅nimky stanovenej v pr-vej zarè™ke ｲlènku 10 (1) smernice 98/34/ES, ｲóm ｲlenskï þtèty nie sÿ povinnï oznèmiﾝ texty, prostrednóctvom ktor̅ch zabez-peｲujÿ sÿlad so zèvêzn̅mi zèkonmi Spoloｲenstva, ktorï majÿ za nèsledok prijatie technick̅ch þpeci«kècióalebopravidielt̅-kajÿcich sa slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnosti.
The Commission has to assess whether the use of the urgency procedure is jus-ti«edandtogiveitsviewsonthecommunicationasquicklyas possible.
› zabezpeｲia sÿlad so zèvêzn̅mi opatreniami Spoloｲenstva, kto-rï majÿ za nèsledok prijatie technick̅ch þpeci«kècióalebopra-vidiel t̅kajÿcich sa slu™ieb,
› ful«ltheobligationsarisingoutofinternationalagreementswhich result in the adoption of common technical speci«ca-tions or rules on services in the Community;
V spoloｲnom própade Albers, Van den Berkmortel a Nuchel-mans (60) sÿd zvè™il, ™e vydanóm zèkazu na podèvanie Clenbu- terolu v̅krmnïmu dobytku Holandsko reþpektovalo svoju po-vinnosﾝ podﾋa smernice 86/469/EHS t̅kajÿcej sa vyþetrenia zvierat a ｲerstvïho mêsa kvúli prótomnosti rezóduó a bolo preto oslobodenï od oznamovacej povinnosti podﾋa ｲlènku 10.
In practice, the Commission carries out a very thorough analy-sis of the reasons given, on the basis of the two criteria con-tained in this paragraph: the seriousness of the situation and (apart from «nancialservices)itsunforeseeablenature.
› plnia povinnosti vypl̅vajÿce z medzinèrodn̅ch dohúd, ktorï majÿ za nèsledok prijatie spoloｲn̅ch technick̅ch þ pe c i « k è c i ó v S p o l o ｲ e n s tflv e alebo pravidiel t̅kajÿcich sa slu™ieb v Spoloｲen-stve.
This reasoning is the same with regard to international agree-ments: when such an agreement contains precise provisions and there is no scope for divergence, the adoption by the t w e n - t y - « v e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s o f a u n i f o r m s e t o f r u l e s i s n o t , i n p r i n c i - p l e , likely to result in trade barriers.
byﾝ kvali«kovanèakolegislatóva,prostrednóctvomktorejbyｲlensk̅ þtèt zabezpeｲil sÿlad so zèvêzn̅m opatrenóm Spolo-ｲenstva s nèsledn̅m prijatóm technick̅ch þpeci«kèció.
failure to give such particulars might mislead the consumer to a material degree as to the true origin or provenance of the f o o d s tffu . .
Rovnakï odúvodnenie sa vzﾝahuje na opatrenia prijatï kvúli za-bezpeｲeniu sÿladu s medzinèrodnou dohodou, ktorè obsahuje þpeci«ckïustanovenia,naimplementèciuktor̅chniejestano-venè ™iadna mo™nosﾝ odch̅lky.
A c c o r d i n g t o t h e C o u r t , t h i s p r o v i s i o n i s d r a ft e d i n g e n e r a l terms which leaves su/cientroomformanoeuvreforitto be concluded that national rules on labelling relating to the origin of olive oil cannot be regarded as national provisions conforming to a binding Community act within the meaning of the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 1 ) o ft h e N o t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e .
Opatrenia prijatï na zabezpe-ｲenie sÿladu s dohodou, ktorej ÿｲastnókmi sÿ vþetky ｲlenskï þtèty, patria do tejto v̅nimky; ak ide o opatrenia prijatï na za-bezpeｲenie sÿladu s medzinèrodnou dohodou, ktorej ÿｲast-nókmi nie sÿ vþetky ｲlenskï þtèty, je potrebnï ich oznèmiﾝ;
Several judgments have clari«edthescopeoftheexceptionlaid down in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 1 ) o f D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C , whereby Member States are not obliged to notify texts by means of which they comply with binding Community acts which result in the adoption of technical speci«cationsorruleson Information Society services.
Toto bol uva™ovan̅ própad. Taliansko presadzovalo nèzor, ™e smernica Rady 79/112/EHS o oznaｲovanó potravón uvalila povinnosﾝ zahrnÿﾝ do oznaｲovania podrobnosti o mies-te púvodu alebo proveniencie v̅robku v própadoch, keｵ nepo-skytnutie tak̅chto podrobnostó mú™e viesﾝ k zèva™nïmu zavè-dzaniu spotrebiteﾋa pokiaﾋ ide o prav̅ púvod alebo provenien-ciu potravón.
In the joined Albers, Van den Berkmortel and Nuchelmans cases, the Court considered that in issuing the prohibition on administering Clenbuterol to fattening cattle, the Netherlands honoured its obligations under Directive 86/469/EEC concern-ing the examination of animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues, and was therefore exempt, under Article 10, from the duty of noti«cation.
Podﾋa sÿdu je toto ustanovenie navrhnutï vþeobecne, ｲo nechèva dostatoｲn̅ priestor na manïvrovanie, aby bolo mo™nï dospieﾝ k zèveru, ™e nèrodnï pravidlè o ozna-ｲovanó t̅kajÿce sa púvodu olivovïho oleja nie je mo™nï pova-™ovaﾝ za nèrodnï ustanovenia, ktorï sÿ v sÿlade so zèvêzn̅m zèkonom Spoloｲenstva v rèmci v̅znamu prvej odrè™ky ｲlènku 10 (1) smernice o poskytovanó informèció.
This restrictive interpretation of the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 1 ) o f the Directive was c o n « r mffe d b y t h e C o u r t i n ` t h e C a n a l S a t ï l - i t e Digital' judgment.
Tÿto obmedzujÿcu interpretèciu prvej odrè™ky ｲlènku 10 (1) smernice potvrdil sÿd v rozsudku ¶Canal Satïlite Digitalƒ (62).
In this judgment, the Court reiterated that Article 10 of Directive 98/34/EC shows that Articles 8 and 9 do not apply to laws, regulations or administrative provisions of Member States, or to voluntary agreements entered into by them, whereby Member States comply with binding Commu-nity measures which result in the adoption of technical speci«-cations.
Plenskï þtèty nemusia oznèmiﾝ Komisii nèvrh predbe™n̅ch opatrenó, na prijatie ktor̅ch majÿ oprèvnenie podﾋa bezpeｲ-nostnej klauzuly obsiahnutej v smerniciach Spoloｲenstva v sÿ-lade s ｲlènkom 95 Zmluvy.
To the extent that the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings transposed Directive 95/47/EC on the use of standards for the transmission of television signals, and to that extent only, there would be no obligation to notify under the N o t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e .
Tento ｲlènok v odseku 10 ustanovu-je, ™e ¶Harmonizaｲnï opatrenia (....), v prósluþn̅ch própadoch, zahﾕﾏajÿ bezpeｲnostnÿ klauzulu oprèvﾏujÿcu ｲlensk̅ þtèt prijaﾝ, z jednïho alebo viacer̅ch neekonomick̅ch dúvodov uveden̅ch v ｲlènku 30, predbe™nï opatrenia, ktorï podliehajÿ kontrolnïmu postupu Spoloｲenstvaƒ.
H o w e v e r , h a v i n g r effg a r d t o t h e c o n t e n t o f D i r e c t i v e 95/47, the Court considered that the national legisla-tion in question, in so far as it established a system of prior ad-ministrative authorisation, - which in fact is not provided by Di-rective 95/47/EC - could not qualify as legislation whereby the Member State complies with a binding Community measure re-sulting in the adoption of technical speci«cations.
Tieto nie hospodèrske dúvody sa mú™u t̅kaﾝ verejnej morèlky, verejnïho poriadku alebo verejnej bezpeｲnosti; ochrany zdra-via a ™ivota ﾋudó, zvierat alebo rastlón, ochrany nèrodn̅ch pokla-dov umeleckej alebo archeologickej hodnoty alebo ochrany priemyselnïho alebo komerｲnïho vlastnóctva;
Conversely, the Court s p e c i « e d , i n t h e U n i l e v e r ju d g mffe n t that Article 10 of the Directive may not be invoked when a provision of a directive allows the Member State su/cientroomforma-noeuvre. This was the case in point.
V tomto rozsudku sÿd znovu opakoval, ™e ｲlènok 10 smernice 98/34/ES ukazuje, ™e ｲlènky 8 a 9 sa nevzﾝahujÿ na zèkony, na-riadenia a administratóvne ustanovenia ｲlensk̅ch þtètov alebo na dobrovoﾋnï dohody nimi uzatvorenï, ｲóm zabezpeｲujÿ sÿ-lad so zèvêzn̅mi opatreniami Spoloｲenstva, ktorï majÿ za nè-sledok prijatie technick̅ch þpeci«kèció.Vrozsahuvakomnè-rodnè legislatóva pri vydanó v hlavnom konanó transponovala smernicu 95/47/ES o pou™óvanó noriem t̅kajÿcich sa prenosu televóznych signèlov a iba v tom rozsahu, neexistuje ™iadna po-vinnosﾝ oznèmenia podﾋa smernice o poskytovanó informèció.
Italy had asserted that Council Directive 79/112/EEC on the labelling of foodstu.sim-posed the obligation to include in the labelling, particulars of the place of origin or provenance of the product in cases where
Avþak s ohﾋadom na obsah smernice 95/47/ES sÿd zvè™il, ™e predmetnè nèrodnè legislatóva do miery ustanovenia systïmu predchèdzajÿceho administratóvneho oprèvnenia › ktor̅ v podstate nie je zaｲlenen̅ do smernice 95/47/ES › by nemohla
Measures adopted to conform with an agreement to which all the Member States are party come
› aplikujÿ ｲlènok 8 (1) smernice Rady 92/59/EHS (
within this exception; if these are measures adopted to con-form with an international agreement to which not all the Member States are party, they must be noti«ed.
o vzèjomnom uznèvanó na zèklade ｲlènku 28 Zmluvy), keｵ™e tieto opatrenia sÿ presne v sÿlade s cieﾋom smernice 98/34/ES.
› make use of safeguard clauses provided for in binding Commu-nity acts; tions to prevent, restrict or impose speci«cconditionsonthepossible marketing or use, within its own territory, of products by reason of a serious risk, it shall immediately notify the Commission thereof through RAPEX.
Plenskï þtèty nemusia oznèmiﾝ nèvrh nèrodn̅ch technick̅ch predpisov t̅kajÿcich sa uplatnenia ｲlènku 12 (1) smernice o vþeobecnej bezpeｲnosti v̅robkov.
The Member States do not have to notify the Commission of the draft provisional measures which they are authorised to take under the safeguard clause contained in Community Di-rectives, in accordance with Article 95 of the Treaty.
Tento ｲlènok stanovuje, ™e ¶keｵ ｲlensk̅ þtèt prijme alebo rozhod-ne o prijató, odporÿｲanó alebo odsÿhlasenó s v̅robcami a distribÿ-tormi, ｲi u™ na bèze povinnosti alebo dobrovoﾋnosti, opatrenia alebo postupy na ochranu, obmedzenie alebo uvalenie þpeci«c-k̅ch podmienok na mo™n̅ marketing alebo pou™óvanie v̅robkov z dúvodu vè™neho rizika, v rèmci svojho vlastnïho ÿzemia, okam-™ite to oznèmi Komisii prostrednóctvom systïmu RAPEX (64).
This Article lays down in paragraph 10 that `The harmonisation measures (....) shall, in appropriate cases, include a safeguard clause author-ising the Member States to take, for one or more of the non-eco-nomic reasons referred to in Article 30, provisional measures sub-ject to a Community control procedure'.
Tie™ okam™ite informuje Komisiu o modi«kèciialebostiahnutóakïho-koﾋvek opatrenia alebo opatrenia („)ƒ.
Judgments by this Court, which is responsible for ensuring compliance with Community law, must be enforced immediately.
› obmedzujÿ sa na implementèciu rozsudku Sÿdneho dvora Eurùpskych spoloｲenstiev;
These non-economic reasons can relate to public morality, public order or public security; the protection of the health and life of humans, animals or plants, the protection of national treasures possessing artistic or archaeological value or the pro-tection of industrial and commercial property.
Na zèklade podmienok odseku (2) a (4) sa obdobie preruþenia prèc na technickom predpise nevzﾝahuje na opatrenia, ktorï majÿ za cieﾋ zèkaz v̅roby do takej miery, pokiaﾋ neprekè™ajÿ voﾋnïmu pohybu tovaru v rèmci Spoloｲenstva, alebo na tech-nickï þpeci«kèciealeboinïpo™iadavkyalebopravidlèt̅kajÿcesa slu™ieb spojenï s «þkèlnymialebo«nanｲn̅miopatreniami.
› restrict themselves to amending a technical regulation within the meaning of point 11 of Article 1, in accordance with a Com-mission request, with a view to removing an obstacle to trade or, in the case of rules on services, to the free movement of services or the freedom of establishment of service operators.
Plenskï þtèty nemusia oznèmiﾝ nèrodnï opatrenia, ktor̅ch v̅-hradn̅m cieﾋom je implementècia rozsudku Sÿdneho dvora t̅kajÿceho sa aspektu inïho ako oznèmenie technickïho pred-pisu.
› apply Article 8 (1) of Council Directive 92/59/EEC;
Rozsudky tohto sÿdu, ktor̅ je zodpovedn̅ za zabezpeｲe-nie sÿladu so zèkonom Spoloｲenstva, musia byﾝ vykonanï okam™ite.
The Member States do not have to notify draft national techni-cal regulations relating to the application of Article 12 (1) of the Directive on general product safety.
V druhom própade bolo po™adovanie odkladu prijatia opatrenó spojen̅ch s «þkèlnymsystïmomｲlensk̅chþtètovpova™ovanïza nevhodnï.
This Article provides that `where a Member State adopts or de-cides to adopt, recommend or agree with producers and distribu-tors, whether on a compulsory or voluntary basis, measures or ac-
› sa obmedzujÿ na zmenu technickïho predpisu v rèmci v̅zna-mu bodu 11 ｲlènku 1, v sÿlade so ™iadosﾝou Komisie, s cieﾋom od-strènenia prekè™ky obchodu alebo, v própade pravidiel t̅kajÿcich sa slu™ieb, prekè™ky voﾋnïmu pohybu slu™ieb alebo slobode usta-novenia operètora slu™ieb.
The Member States are not required to notify national meas-ures aimed solely at amending a technical regulation in order to remove obstacles in response to a request, for instance through a detailed opinion or comments, from the Commis-sion (for example, a request for the inclusion of a mutual recog-nition clause, based on Article 28 of the Treaty), since these measures are precisely in accordance with the objective of Di-rective 98/34/EC.
Od ｲlensk̅ch þtètov sa nepo™aduje oznamovanie nèrodn̅ch opatrenó zameran̅ch v̅luｲne na zmenu technickïho predpisu kvúli odstrèneniu prekè™ok ako reakcia na po™iadavku, napró-klad prostrednóctvom podrobnïho stanoviska alebo pripomie-nok od Komisie (napróklad, po™iadavka na zaｲlenenie klauzuly
RAPEX, whose legal basis is Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety, serves as a single rapid alert system for dangerous consumer products.
'64) RAPEX, ktorïho prèvnym zèkladom je smernica 2001/95/ES o vþeobecnej bezpeｲnosti v̅robkov, slÿ™i ako jednotn̅ systïm r̅chleho varovania pre nebezpeｲ-nï spotrebiteﾋskï v̅robky.
All non-food products intended for consumers or likely under reasonably foreseeable conditions to be used by consumers are included within the scope of RAPEX, with the exception of pharmaceutical and medical products.
Vþetky nepotravinovï v̅robky urｲenï pre spotrebiteﾋov alebo urｲenï na pou™óvanie pre spotrebiteﾋov za primerane predvódateﾋ- n̅ch podmienok sÿ zahrnutï v rèmci rozsahu systïmu RAPEX, okrem farmaceutick̅ch a medicónskych v̅robkov.
cerning a subject covered by current or imminent Community work, do not apply to voluntary agreements.
dzen̅ch na odstraﾏovanie u™ existujÿcich regulaｲn̅ch prekè™ok.
It may be concluded from the reading of Articles 8, 9 and 10 of Directive 98/34/EC that the information procedure applicable to technical regulations is quite complex.
Keｵ prósluþn̅ ｲlensk̅ þtèt nezabezpeｲó sÿlad, postup vedie k rozsudku Sÿdneho dvora (66) o nesplnenó povinnostó.
Under the terms of paragraphs (2) and (4), a standstill period does not apply to measures seeking to prohibit manufacturing, to the extent that these do not obstruct the free movement of goods within the Community, or to technical speci«cationsorother requirements or rules on services linked to «scalor«nan-cial measures.
Fyzickï osoby sa mú™u, pokiaﾋ sa ich to t̅ka, spoliehaﾝ na sku-toｲnosﾝ, ™e technickï predpisy ktor̅m majÿ vyhovieﾝ, ale ktorï neboli oznèmenï, tieto nemú™u byﾝ voｲi nim vymèhanï (67).
Furthermore, the Directive's provisions on technical regulations impose very strict obligations on the Member States (much more restrictive than those applicable to standards), which are balanced by the right to react to draft national regulations be-ing prepared by other Member States and by the saving of time and of much more complex procedures, both at Community and national levels, which would result from ex post procedures purely limited at removing already existing regulatory obsta-cles.
Okrem toho ustanovenia smernice t̅kajÿce sa technick̅ch predpisov uvaﾋujÿ veﾋmi prósne povinnosti na ｲlenskï þtèty (oveﾋa prósnejþie ako povinnosti uplatniteﾋnï na normy), ktorï sÿ vyvè™enï prèvom reagovaﾝ na nèvrh nèrodn̅ch predpisov pripraven̅ch ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi a ÿsporou ｲasu a oveﾋa kom-plexnejþómi postupmi tak na ÿrovni Spoloｲenstva, ako aj na nè-rodnej ÿrovni, ktorï vychèdzajÿ z postupov ex post ｲisto obme-
As far as draft regulations concerning «scalor«nancialmeas-ures are concerned, the absence of the standstill obligation for the notifying Member State does not exclude the Commission or another Member State from reacting to these drafts by means of comments or detailed opinions (See Article 8 (1)).
Okrem toho, rozsudok v própade Unilever stanovil, ™e dokonca aj opatrenie, ktorï je oznèmenï, ale ktorï je nèsledne prijatï poｲas obdobia preruþenia prèc na technickom predpise stano-venïho v ｲlènku 9 smernice 98/34/ES, nemú™e byﾝ voｲi jednot-livcom vymèhanï (68).
Under the terms of paragraph (3), the blockage and the stand-still obligations applicable to draft national regulations con-
'65) Dokument Stèleho v̅boru 94/94 › koneｲnè verzia z 8. jÿna 1995 a Dokument Stèleho v̅boru S-42/98 (def).'66) Odkaz na tieto rozsudky je v Bode V bibliogra«e.
Chapter IV: The Standing Committee
Kapitola IV: Stèly v̅bor
› identify the areas where harmonisation appears necessary, and, should the case arise, undertake appropriate harmonisa-tion in a given sector.
› identi«kovalaoblasti,vktor̅chjeharmonizècianevyhnutnèav própade potreby, vykonala prósluþnÿ harmonizèciu v danom sektore.
The Committee must be consulted by the Commission: a) before any amendment is made to the lists in Annexes I and II (Article 2 (1));
Komisia musó s V̅borom konzultovaﾝ: a) pred akoukoﾋvek zmenou zoznamu v Prólohèch I a II (ｲlènok 2 (1));
A Standing Committee shall be set up consisting of representa-tives appointed by the Member States who may call on the assist-ance of experts or advisers; its chairman shall be a representative of the Commission.
Stèly v̅bor bude zostaven̅ zo zèstupcov menovan̅ch ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi, ktoró mú™u privolaﾝ na pomoc odbornókov alebo poradcov; jeho predseda je zèstupcom Komisie.