natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OTHERINSTITUTIONS
EURÓPSKEJÚNIE
4 Relations with other institutionsof the European Union
4 Vzťahy s inými inštitúciami Európskej únie
PUBLICRELATIONS
STYKSVEREJNOSŤOU
6 Public relations
6 Styk s verejnosťou
© The European Ombudsman 2004
© Európsky ombudsman 2004
Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permi ed provided that the source is acknowledged.
Reprodukcia pre vzdelávacie a nekomerčné účely je povolená v prípade, ak sa uvedie zdroj.
Photographs, unless otherwise indicated, are copyright of the European Ombudsman.
Na fotografie, ak nie je uvedené inak, sa vzťahuje copyright Európskeho ombudsmana.
The full text of the report is published on the internet at:h p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report/en/default.htm
Úplný text správy je publikovaný na internetovej stránke:h p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report/sk/default.htm
EUROPEAN O
EURÓPSKY
Mr Pat Cox President European Parliament Rue Wiertz B-1047 Brussels
Pat Cox predseda Európsky parlament Rue Wiertz B - 1047 Brusel
Mr President,
Vážený pán predseda,
In accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my report for the year 2003.
V súlade s článkom 195 ods. 1 Zmluvy zakladajúcej Európske spoločenstvo a článkom 3 ods. 8 Rozhodnutia Európskeho parlamentu o predpisoch a všeobecných podmienkach pre výkon funkcie ombudsmana týmto predkladám svoju správu za rok 2003.
ANNUAL REPORT 2003
VÝROČNÁ SPRÁVA 2003
Complaints to the Ombudsman
Sťažnosti predložené ombudsmanovi
2.2.1 “Maladministration” 2.2.2 The Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
2.2 PÔSOBNOSŤ EURÓPSKEHO OMBUDSMANA 2.2.1 „Nesprávny úradný postup“
2.3 ADMISSIBILITY OF COMPLAINTS
2.3 PRÍPUSTNOSŤ SŤAŽNOSTÍ
2.4 GROUNDS FOR INQUIRIES
2.4 ODÔVODNENIA VYŠETROVANÍ
2.6 ADVICE TO CONTACT OTHER BODIES AND TRANSFERS
2.6 RADY VO VECI KONTAKTOVANIA INÝCH ORGÁNOV A POSTÚPENIA SŤAŽNOSTÍ
2.7.1 The hearing of witnesses 2.7.2 Inspection of documents
2.7 VYŠETROVACIE PRÁVOMOCI OMBUDSMANA 2.7.1 Vypočúvanie svedkov
2.8 INQUIRIES BY THE OMBUDSMAN AND THEIR OUTCOMES
2.8 VYŠETROVANIA OMBUDSMANA A ICH VÝSLEDKY 2.8.1 Vyšetrovania nadväzujúce na sťažnosť
Decisions following an inquiry
Rozhodnutia v nadväznosti na vyšetrovanie
3.1 CASES WHERE NO MALADMINISTRATION WAS FOUND
3.1 PRÍPADY V KTORÝCH NEBOL ZISTENÝ NESPRÁVNY ÚRADNÝ POSTUP
3.1.1 The European Parliament 37ALLEGED LACK OF SERVICE-MINDEDNESS IN RECRUITMENT...........................................................................................................................................37 ...........................................................................................................................................37
3.1.1 Európsky parlament 37ÚDAJNÝ NEDOSTATOK ÚSTRETOVOSTI PRI VÝBEROVÝCH KONANIACH........................................................................................................................37 ........................................................................................................................37
3.1.2 The Council of the European Union 39ACCESS TO EUROPEAN CONVENTION AGENDAS AND MINUTES.....................................................................................................................................39 .....................................................................................................................................39
3.1.2 Rada Európskej únie 39PRÍSTUP K PROGRAMOM A ZÁPISNICIAM KONVENTU O BUDÚCNOSTI EURÓPY.........................................................................................................39 .........................................................................................................39
3.1.3 The European Commission
3.1.3 Európska komisia
LIFE PROGRAMME: COMMISSION’S REFUSAL TO COMPLETE PAYMENT OF A PROJECT ............................................................................................41ANNULMENT OF QUESTIONS AND ALLEGED FAILURE TO RESPECT COMPETITION NOTICE..................................................................................47 ..................................................................................47
PROGRAM LIFE: ZAMIETNUTIE DOKONČENIA PLATBY PROJEKTU EURÓPSKOU KOMISIOU ....................................................................................41ANULOVANIE OTÁZOK A ÚDAJNÁ NESCHOPNOSŤ ODPOVEDAŤ NA OZNÁMENIE O VÝBEROVOM KONANÍ...................................................46 ...................................................46
ALLEGED LINGUISTIC DISCRIMINATION ....................................................................................................................................................................................50STATUS OF THE ‘EU PILLAR’ OF THE UN ADMINISTRATION IN KOSOVO .........................................................................................................................53TRAVELLING AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES OF CANDIDATES IN RECRUITMENT COMPETITIONS ........................................................................55ALLEGED DISCRIMINATION IN GRADING OF NUCLEAR INSPECTOR ...............................................................................................................................57REFUSAL OF A CONFIRMATORY APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS IN ARTICLE 226 PROCEDURE .......................................................................60ALLEGED INDIRECT AGE DISCRIMINATION IN OPEN COMPETITION ..............................................................................................................................67COMMISSION’S REFUSAL TO GRANT ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY MEMBER STATES ..........................................................................69EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S HANDLING OF AN APPLICATION FOR A POST OF SECONDED NATIONAL EXPERT ...............................................70ACCESS TO MARKED EXAMINATION SCRIPTS IN COMPETITIONS ORGANISED BY THE COMMISSION ................................................................74
OBVINENIE Z JAZYKOVEJ DISKRIMINÁCIE ..................................................................................................................................................................................50ŠTATÚT „PILIERA EÚ“ ADMINISTRATÍVY OSN V KOSOVE .......................................................................................................................................................52NÁKLADY NA CESTOVNÉ A DIÉTY UCHÁDZAČOV O PRACOVNÉ MIESTA, KTORÍ SA ZÚČASTŇUJÚ NA VÝBEROVOM KONANÍ .................54OBVINENIE Z DISKRIMINÁCIE PRI URČOVANÍ PRACOVNÉHO ZARADENIAJADROVÉHO INŠPEKTORA .............................................................57ZAMIETNUTIE OPAKOVANEJ ŽIADOSTI O PRÍSTUP VEREJNOSTI K DOKUMENTOM O POSTUPE PODĽA ČLÁNKU 226 ....................................59ÚDAJNÁ NEPRIAMA DISKRIMINÁCIA NA ZÁKLADE VEKU V OTVORENOM KONKURZE ...........................................................................................66ZAMIETNUTIE UMOŽNENIA PRÍSTUPU K DOKUMENTOM POCHÁDZAJÚCIM OD ČLENSKÝCH ŠTÁTOV ZO STRANY EURÓPSKE KOMISIE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................68ZAOBCHÁDZANIE S PRIHLÁŠKOU NA POST NÁRODNÉHO EXPERTA V EURÓPSKEJ KOMISII ...................................................................................69PRÍSTUP K VYHODNOTENÝM TESTOM VO VÝBEROVÝCH KONANIACH, KTORÉ ORGANIZOVALA EURÓPSKA KOMISIA ..............................73
3.1.4 The European Central Bank 77ACCESS TO STATISTICS ABOUT STOCKS AND FLOWS OF EURO BANKNOTES ...............................................................................................................77
3.1.4 Európska centrálna banka 76PRÍSTUP K FINANČNÝM VÝKAZOM O STAVE ZÁSOB A TOKOCH EURA............................................................................................................................76 ............................................................................................................................76
3.1.5 The European Court of Auditors 81COURT OF AUDITORS CORRECTS FAILURE TO APPLY RULES ON ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS.....................................................................................81 .....................................................................................81
3.1.5 Európsky dvor audítorov 81DVOR AUDÍTOROV NAPRAVÍ CHYBU PRI UPLATŇOVANÍ ZÁKONA O SPRÍSTUPNENÍ INFORMÁCIÍ......................................................................81 ......................................................................81
3.1.6 The European Convention 83ACCESS TO EUROPEAN CONVENTION AGENDAS AND MINUTES.....................................................................................................................................83 .....................................................................................................................................83
3.1.6 Konvent o budúcnosti Európy 83PRÍSTUP K PROGRAMU A ZÁPISNICIAM KONVENTU O BUDÚCNOSTI EURÓPY.............................................................................................................83 .............................................................................................................83
3.1.7 The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce 89ALLEGED FAILURE TO CARRY OUT PROPER INQUIRY ............................................................................................................................................................89
3.1.7 Európsky úrad boja proti podvodom 89ÚDAJNÝ NESPRÁVNY POSTUP VYŠETROVANIA .........................................................................................................................................................................89
3.1.8 The European Agency for Reconstruction 93CONSULTANCY WORK FOR THE EUROPEAN AGENCY FOR RECONSTRUCTION ...........................................................................................................93
3.1.8 Európska agentúra pre obnovu 93KONZULTAČNÁ ČINNOSŤ PRE EURÓPSKU AGENTÚRU PRE OBNOVU..............................................................................................................................93 ..............................................................................................................................93
3.2 CASES SETTLED BY THE INSTITUTION 3.2.1 The European Parliament
3.2 PRÍPADY VYRIEŠENÉ INŠTITÚCIOU 3.2.1 Európsky parlament
ALLEGED FAILURE TO STATE REASONS FOR REJECTION OF TRANSLATION BIDS ........................................................................................................97ACCESS TO EXAMINATION PAPERS IN OPEN COMPETITION.............................................................................................................................................100 .............................................................................................................................................100
ÚDAJNÉ POCHYBENIE PRI UVÁDZANÍ DÔVODOV ODMIETNUTIA PONUKY PREKLADATEĽSKÝCH SLUŽIEB .....................................................96PRÍSTUP K PÍSOMNÝM TESTOM VEREJNÝCH KONKURZOV..................................................................................................................................................99 ..................................................................................................................................................99
3.2.2 The European Commission
3.2.2 Európska komisia
LATE PAYMENT OF GRANT FOR AIDS’ RELATED PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................................101PAYMENT OF AMOUNT DUE UNDER CONTRACT ..................................................................................................................................................................103ALLEGED FAILURE TO MAKE FINAL PAYMENT IN RESEARCH PROJECT........................................................................................................................105 ........................................................................................................................105
ONESKORENÉ VYPLATENIE GRANTU UDELENÉHO PROJEKTU SÚVISIACEHO S AIDS ...............................................................................................101VYPLATENIE ZMLUVNEJ ČIASTKY ................................................................................................................................................................................................102ÚDAJNÉ NEUSKUTOČNENIE ZÁVEREČNEJ PLATBY PRE VÝSKUMNÝ PROJEKT............................................................................................................104 ............................................................................................................104
3.2.3 The European Court of Auditors 107ALLEGED LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT EXCLUSION FROM COURT OF AUDITORS’ COMPETITION ..............................................................107
3.2.3 Dvor audítorov 106ÚDAJNÝ NEDOSTATOK INFORMÁCIÍ O VYLÚČENÍ Z VÝBEROVÉHO KONANIA DVORA AUDÍTOROV .................................................................106
3.2.4 The European Commission and the Court of Auditors 109COMMISSION AGREES TO MAKE FINAL PAYMENT ................................................................................................................................................................109
3.2.4 Európska komisia a Európsky dvor audítorov 108KOMISIA SÚHLASÍ SO ZÁVEREČNOU PLATBOU.......................................................................................................................................................................108 .......................................................................................................................................................................108
3.3 FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED BY THE OMBUDSMAN
3.3 PRIATEĽSKÉ RIEŠENIA SPROSTREDKOVANÉ OMBUDSMANOM
FAILURE TO PAY GRANT DESPITE ORAL ASSURANCES ........................................................................................................................................................115COMMISSION ACCEPTS TO PAY COMPENSATION TO FORMER AUXILIARY AGENT ...................................................................................................120COMMISSION AGREES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO JOURNALIST AFTER OMBUDSMAN’S PROPOSAL FOR FRIENDLYSOLUTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................123
NEVYPLATENIE GRANTU AJ NAPRIEK SLOVNÉMU UBEZPEČENIU ..................................................................................................................................113SÚHLAS KOMISIE SO ZAPLATENÍM KOMPENZÁCIE BÝVALÉMU POMOCNÉMU PRACOVNÍKOVI .........................................................................118SÚHLAS KOMISIE S POSKYTNUTÍM INFORMÁCIE ŽURNALISTOVI PO NÁVRHU OMBUDSMANA NA PRIATEĽSKÉ RIEŠENIE SPORU........121 ........121
3.4 CASES CLOSED WITH A CRITICAL REMARK BY THE OMBUDSMAN
3.4 PRÍPADY OMBUDSMANA UZAVRETÉ KRITICKOU POZNÁMKOU
3.4.1 The European Parliament 129FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DUTY TO BE COURTEOUS.........................................................................................................................................................129 .........................................................................................................................................................129
3.4.1 Európsky parlament 127PORUŠENIE POVINNOSTI BYŤ ZDVORILÝ...................................................................................................................................................................................127 ...................................................................................................................................................................................127
3.4.2 The Council of the European Union
3.4.2 Rada Európskej únie
ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................134THE COUNCIL’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THAT THE EUROPEAN UNION POLICE MISSION IN SARAJEVORESPECTS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................141
PRÍSTUP K DOKUMENTOM ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................132ZODPOVEDNOSŤ RADY VO VECI ZABEZPEČENIA DODRŽIAVANIA ZÁKLADNÝCH PRÁV ZO STRANY POLICAJNEJ MISIE EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE V SARAJEVE...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................138 ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................138
3.4.3 The European Commission
3.4.3 Európska komisia
INCORRECT INFORMATION IN A TENDER PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................................................................144FUNCTIONING OF THE IST PROGRAMME .................................................................................................................................................................................150ALLEGED FAILURE TO TAKE A DECISION IN AN INFRINGEMENT COMPLAINT (ARTICLE 226 EC) ........................................................................151DISCRIMINATORY CLAUSE IN NOTICE OF COMPETITION ..................................................................................................................................................154INCONSISTENT APPROACH TO STUDY ON SEALS BY COMMISSION ...............................................................................................................................159ALLEGED FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING TENDER SPECIFICATIONS ..............................................................................................165
NESPRÁVNE INFORMÁCIE O VEREJNEJ SÚŤAŽI .......................................................................................................................................................................141PROGRAM IST . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 147 ÚDAJNÁ NESCHOPNOSŤ ROZHODNÚŤ VO VECI SŤAŽNOSTI NA PORUŠENIE (PODĽA ČLÁNKU 226 ES) .............................................................148DISKRIMINAČNÁ KLAUZULA V OZNÁMENÍ O VÝBEROVOM KONANÍ ...........................................................................................................................151NEDÔSLEDNÝ PRÍSTUP KOMISIE K VÝSKUMU O TULEŇOCH .............................................................................................................................................155ÚDAJNÉ NEPOSKYTNUTIE ODPOVEDÍ NA OTÁZKY O PODKLADOCH K VEREJNEJ SÚŤAŽI.....................................................................................161 .....................................................................................161
3.4.4 The Economic and Social Commi ee 169ALLEGATION THAT COMPLAINANT PROVIDED “FALSE INFORMATION” IN FRAMEWORK OF RECRUITMENT..............................................169 ..............................................169
3.4.4 Hospodársky a sociálny výbor 165ÚDAJNÉ POSKYTNUTIE „NEPRAVDIVÝCH INFORMÁCIÍ“ ZO STRANY SŤAŽOVATEĽA POČAS PRIJÍMACIEHO KONANIA.............................165 .............................165
3.4.5 The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce 173UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY AGAINST JOURNALIST...................................................................................................................................173 ...................................................................................................................................173
3.4.5 Európsky úrad boja proti podvodom 169NEPODLOŽENÉ OBVINENIA Z ÚPLATKÁRSTVA VOČI NOVINÁROVI...............................................................................................................................169 ...............................................................................................................................169
3.5 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPTED BY THE INSTITUTION 3.5.1 The Council of the European Union
3.5 NÁVRHY ODPORÚČANÍ PRIJATÉ INŠTITÚCIOU 3.5.1 Rada Európskej únie
COUNCIL GRANTS PARTIAL ACCESS TO ANNUAL REPORT OF CODE OF CONDUCT GROUP .................................................................................175COUNCIL GRANTS ACCESS TO CANDIDATES’ MARKED EXAMINATION PAPERS........................................................................................................176 ........................................................................................................176
RADA UDELÍ ČIASTOČNÝ PRÍSTUP K VÝROČNEJ SPRÁVE SKUPINY PRE KÓDEX SPRÁVANIA ..................................................................................170RADA UDELÍ PRÍSTUP K VYHODNOTENÝM TESTOM KANDIDÁTA...................................................................................................................................172 ...................................................................................................................................172
3.5.2 The European Commission
3.5.2 Európska komisia
COMMISSION TO PROMOTE GOOD ADMINISTRATION IN EUROPEAN SCHOOLS .......................................................................................................181DISCRIMINATION ON THE GROUNDS OF NATIONALITY BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY AND EU COMPETITION LAW.............188 .............188
KOMISIA MÁ PODPOROVAŤ DOBRÚ SPRÁVU V EURÓPSKYCH ŠKOLÁCH ......................................................................................................................177DISKRIMINÁCIA NA ZÁKLADE ŠTÁTNEJ PRÍSLUŠNOSTI ZO STRANY TELEKOMUNIKAČNEJ FIRMY A LEGISLATÍVY EÚ O SÚŤAŽI............183 ............183
3.6 CASES CLOSED AFTER A SPECIAL REPORT
3.6 PRÍPADY UZAVRETÉ PO OSOBITNEJ SPRÁVE
3.6.1 The European Parliament 194EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACCEPTS TO PUBLISH NAMES OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES IN RECRUITMENT COMPETITIONS...................194 ...................194
3.6.1 Európsky parlament 189EURÓPSKY PARLAMENT SÚHLASÍ S UVEREJŇOVANÍM MIEN ÚSPEŠNÝCH UCHÁDZAČOV VÝBEROVÝCH KONANÍ.....................................189 .....................................189
3.6.2 The Council of the European Union 195ACCESS TO COUNCIL DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING OPINIONS OF THE LEGAL SERVICE .............................................................................................195
3.6.2 Rada Európskej únie 189PRÍSTUP K DOKUMENTOM RADY, VRÁTANE STANOVÍSK PRÁVNEJ SLUŽBY.................................................................................................................189 .................................................................................................................189
3.7 OWN INITIATIVE INQUIRIES BY THE OMBUDSMAN
3.7 VYŠETROVANIE Z VLASTNÉHO PODNETU OMBUDSMANA