natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This provides that where it is alleged that a worker has been unfairly dismissed by an employer, or where there is an alleged breach of any obligation under Title I of the act (thus including discriminatory treat-ment) or any regulations prescribed thereunder, the matter shall be referred to the Industrial Tri-bunal for a decision by it by means of a referral in writing made by the worker alleging the breach, or by some other person acting in the name and on behalf of such a worker.
Konanie sa zaｲóna na nèvrh osoby dotknutej nedodr™anóm zèsady rovnakïho zaob-chèdzania (oznaｲovanej ako navrhovateﾋ alebo ™alobca), ktor̅ sa naz̅va ™aloba. çaloba sa podèva na sÿd, v obvode ktorïho mè bydlisko alebo stèle pracovisko osoba, proti ktorej ™aloba smeruje (oznaｲovanè ako odporca alebo ™alovan̅). çaloba musó obsahovaﾝ identifikaｲnï ÿdaje ™alobcu a ™alovanïho (ktor̅mi sÿ meno, priezvisko, bydlisko a ÿdaj o þtètnom obｲianstve), pravdivï opósa-nie rozhodujÿcich skutoｲnostó (teda ｲo sa vlastne stalo, v ｲom spoｲóva poruþenie zèsady rovnakï-ho zaobchèdzania), a oznaｲenie dúkazov, ktor̅ch sa navrhovateﾋ dovolèva (napróklad prilo™enie kùpió vþetk̅ch listón, z ktor̅ch vypl̅va, ™e doþlo k poruþeniu zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania). Zo ™aloby tie™ musó byﾝ zrejmï, ｲoho sa navrhovateﾋ domèha › teda ｲi ™iada napróklad ospravedlnenie alebo nèhradu nemajetkovej ujmy v peniazoch.
Also, in terms of Article 12(1)(j) of the equality for men and women act, 2003, the Commissioner for the Promotion of Equality, with the assistance of the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality for Men and Women, is empowered to provide assistance, where and as appropriate, to persons suffering from discrimination in enforcing their rights under the act.
Prève oznaｲenie dúkazov zo strany ™alobcu je veﾋmi dúle™itï. Ak toti™ ™alobca predlo™ó sÿdu dúka-zy, z ktor̅ch mo™no dúvodne usudzovaﾝ, ™e k poruþeniu zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania doþlo, je povinnosﾝou ™alovanïho preukèzaﾝ, ™e tÿto zèsadu neporuþil.
Furthermore, Arti-cle 17(1) of the said act provides that the Commissioner may initiate investigations (a) on any matter involving an act or omission that is allegedly unlawful under the provisions of the act, and (b) on receipt of a written complaint by a person who claims to be the victim of an act or omission contrary to the provisions of the act.
In̅mi slovami, dúkaznï bremeno sa obracia v neprospech ™alovanïho, a ten sa musó z podozrenia, ™e poruþil zèsadu rovnakïho zaobchèdzania, ¶vyviniﾝƒ. Obrètenï dúkaznï bremeno je v própadoch poruþenia zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania veﾋmi dúle™itï.
Possible situations where there could be discrimination are:
Uﾋahｲuje toti™ diskriminovan̅m osobèm, ktorï by ｲasto poruþenie zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania mohli len veﾋmi ﾝa™ko preukèzaﾝ, aby sa domohli svojich prèv.
Combating discrimination › A training manual
Boj proti diskriminècii › Odbornè próruｲka notliv̅ch ustanovenó antidiskriminaｲn̅ch smernóc.
† social security payments (inasmuch as they are classified in EU law as `pay')
Ak sa jednè o potre-bu vyrieþenia predbe™nej otèzky pred vnÿtroþtètnym sÿdom najvyþþej inþtancie, tak̅to sÿd je povinn̅ obrètiﾝ sa so ™iadosﾝou o konanie o predbe™nej otèzke na luxembursk̅ sÿd.
† issue of permits and licences (inasmuch as they are covered by common Article 3)
s Inþtitÿcie na nèrodnej ÿrovni (najmê verejnï) vysoko reþpektujÿ autoritu Sÿdneho dvora ES a pravdepodobne sa budÿ sna™iﾝ, aby nevystavovali diskriminèciu odohrèvajÿcu sa na vnÿtro-þtètnej ÿrovni celoeurùpskej pozornosti.
† access to vocational training, including vocational training in prisons (inasmuch as it is covered by common Article 3).
s Sÿdny dvor ES je jedinou inþtitÿciou, ktorè mú™e poskytnÿﾝ definitóvnu interpretèciu jednotli-v̅ch ustanovenó antidiskriminaｲn̅ch smernóc.
Where a choice of avenues for raising either an employment-related or a non-employment-related complaint exists
Na druhej strane je vþak tento typ konania veﾋmi þpecifickou procedÿrou a na jej ÿspeþnï zvlèdnu-tie je treba spolupracovaﾝ s prèvnikom alebo prèvniｲkou, ktoró sÿ expertmi na prèvo Eà.
† Object of complaint ̌ is it justice for the individual or raising awareness of discrimination?
Jednotlivci, ktoró sa domnievajÿ, ™e ich prèva garantovanï Eurùpskou ÿniou nie sÿ plne reþpekto-vanï, majÿ prèvo obrètiﾝ sa na Parlament s petóciami, ktorï preþetruje V̅bor pre petócie.
† Time limits applicable to different procedures and whether the complainant can comply with them.
Jednotliv-ci sa vþak mú™u na Eurùpsky parlament obrètiﾝ aj v in̅ch própadoch, ktorï spadajÿ do púsobnosti Eurùpskej ÿnie.
† Possibility of quashing the adverse decision complained of.
Upozornenie Eurùpskej komisii
† Whether or not a legally binding solution is sought and required, and available.
226 - 228 ZES, ktorï mú™e vyÿstiﾝ a™ do udelenia pokuty ｲlenskïmu þtètu Sÿdnym dvorom ES.
† Assessment of available evidence ̌ appropriateness and sufficiency of evidence for mecha-nism to be used.
Upozornenie Odboru rodinnej a rodovej politiky na Ministerstve prèce, socièlnych vecó a rodiny
† Whether or not legal representation is required or highly desirable.
Odbor rodinnej a rodovej politiky (do 8.3.2005 Odbor rovnosti próle™itostó a antidiskriminècie) mè taktie™ niekoﾋko ÿloh, ktorï sÿvisia s uplatﾏovanóm Antidiskriminaｲnïho zèkona.
† Availability of legal assistance.
Okrem ｵalþóch ÿloh tento odbor:
A person who has been discriminated against may make a complaint, first and foremost to bring justice for himself and to obtain some form of compensation. This is, however, not the only reason why a person should make a complaint.
Okrem vyþþie uveden̅ch mo™nostó majÿ obete diskriminècie aj inï mo™nosti, ako rieþiﾝ situècie, kedy ne™iaduce, zneva™ujÿce a znev̅hodﾏujÿce sprèvanie zni™uje ich ﾋudskÿ dústojnosﾝ.
A person who alleges that the employer has acted in a discriminatory way, may within four months of the alleged breach, lodge a complaint to the Industrial Tribunal and the Industrial Tribunal shall hear such complaint and carry out any investigations as it shall deem fit.
Tu nemusó ósﾝ len o diskriminaｲnï prejavy, voｲi ktor̅m poskytuje ochranu Antidiskriminaｲn̅ zèkon, ale mú™e ósﾝ aj o akïkoﾋvek inï prejavy, ktorï dotknutè osoba z akïhokoﾋvek dúvodu vnóma ako diskriminaｲnï a poni™ujÿce jej dústojnosﾝ.
Also, according to Regulation 9 of Legal Notice 461 of 2004, it is stated that:
çaloba na ochranu osobnosti
`Where an allegation is made that some form of discriminatory treatment has occurred, the person making the allegation, or the director, if either deems fit, shall have the right to send a written notification to the employer or any person or organ-isation to whom these regulations apply, hereafter referred to as the respondent, of the alleged discriminatory treatment received, giving any relevant details and requesting a reply.
Salþou mo™nosﾝou, ktorè prichèdza do ÿvahy v própade, ™e sa urｲitè osoba domnieva, ™e diskriminaｲnï konanie, ktorï bolo voｲi nej nasmerovanï, mè za cieﾋ alebo nèsledok zèsah do jej ﾋudskej dústojnosti, sÿkromia alebo obｲianskej cti, je mo™nosﾝ obrètiﾝ sa na sÿd s tzv. ™alobou na ochranu osobnosti. Tako-
Combating discrimination › A training manual such notification or that his reply was evasive or equivocal, the Tribunal or Court may draw any inference from that fact that it considers just and equitable to draw, includ-ing an inference that he committed an unlawful act.'
V própadoch, ™e bola v znaｲnej miere znó™enè dústojnosﾝ osoby alebo jej vè™nosﾝ v spo-loｲnosti, dotknutè osoba mè tie™ prèvo domèhaﾝ sa nèhrady nemajetkovej ujmy v peniazoch. V̅þku takejto nèhrady by sÿd urｲil v™dy s prihliadnutóm na vþetky okolnosti própadu.
However, the provisions laid down in the regulation mentioned above, requiring the respondent to submit a reply, shall not apply if, on the date that the request was made, proceedings had already been initiated on the matter in front of the Industrial Tribunal or other Court.
V konanó o ™alobe na ochranu osobnosti sa vþak na rozdiel od própadov, kedy by sÿd rozhodoval o poruþenó zèsady rovnakï-ho zaobchèdzania, neaplikuje obrètenï dúkaznï bremeno.
This section should not only indicate what procedures have to be followed but also what factual information is mandatory to be included in the submission of the complaint under national rules.
Jednou z mo™nostó je iniciovaﾝ priestupkovï konanie, a to konkrïtne podanóm oznèmenia o spèchanó priestupku proti obｲianskemu spoluna™óvaniu.
As stated above, a person who alleges that the employer has acted in a discriminatory way, may within four months of the alleged breach, lodge a complaint to the Industrial Tribunal and the Industrial Tribunal shall hear such complaint and carry out any investigations as it shall deem fit.
Takïhoto priestupku sa dopustó ten, kto inïmu ubló™i na cti t̅m, ™e ho urazó alebo vydè na posmech, alebo ten, kto ÿmyselne naruþó obｲianske spoluna™óvanie vyhrè™anóm ujmou na zdravó, drobn̅m ubló™enóm na zdravó, schvèlnosﾝami alebo in̅m hrub̅m sprèva-nóm.
In particular, it is meant to ensure that sexual harassment at the workplace is prohibited and that it is clearly understood that it can give rise to serious consequences if it does in fact subsist.
Oznamovateﾋ priestupku mè prèvo po™iadaﾝ, aby ho sprèvny orgèn do jednïho mesiaca upovedomil o vykonan̅ch opatreniach.
In Malta it may be noted that judges, the Ombudsman, and administrative review bodies lack familiarity with the directives and national anti-discrimination provisions.
V própadoch, keｵ sÿ diskriminujÿcimi subjektami orgèny þtètnej sprèvy, orgèny samosprèvy alebo sÿdy prostrednóctvom svojich rozhodnutó, mú™e sa dotknut̅ jednotlivec obrètiﾝ na àstavn̅ sÿd a ™iadaﾝ o nèpravu.
Also, the court costs which a person would incur or the risk of costs where the case is lost could be seen as an obstacle for people to bring forward their case when they have been discriminated against.
Sﾝa™ovateﾋ mú™e po vyｲerpanó dostupn̅ch opravn̅ch prostriedkov namietaﾝ poruþenie prèva na rovnosﾝ.
In this regard support may be given to people who have been discriminated against when being represented by NGOs.
Lehota na podanie sﾝa™nosti je dva mesiace od poslednïho rozhod-nutia, postupu alebo opatrenia, na ktorï sa obｲan sﾝa™uje.
Also, they could make use of the resources which equality commissions have available to support individual complaints.
Pred àstavn̅m sÿdom vþak mo™no namietaﾝ poruþenie zèsady rovnosti len pri uplatﾏovanó t̅ch zèkladn̅ch prèv a slobúd, ktorï sÿ zakotvenï v àstave Slovenskej republiky.
Referrals to the European Court of Justice
Sﾝa™nosﾝ na Eurùpsky sÿd pre ﾋudskï prèva
Where there is a disputed issue of EU law, a referral can be made by a national court to the Euro-pean Court of Justice in Luxembourg under Article 234 of the Treaty.
Sﾝa™nosﾝ smeruje voｲi þtètu, ktor̅ vo vzﾝahu k sﾝa™ovateﾋovi poruþil niektorï prèvo obsiahnutï v Dohovore.
Discrimination in the national context ings can ask the national judge to grant a request for such a referral, or the judge can decide spontaneously to refer the case.
Prvï podanie Eurùpskemu sÿdu mú™e vþak maﾝ aj formu listu (própadne inej pósomnosti zaslanej poþtou › v krajnom própade aj formou pohﾋadnice alebo koreþpondenｲnïho lóstka) a mú™e byﾝ sÿdu adresovanï aj v slovenskom jazyku.
Any court may make a referral, but only the national court of last instance is obliged to do so.
V takomto própa-de by sÿd po™iadal sﾝa™ovateﾋa o doplnenie ÿdajov na predpósanom formulèri.
This may be a highly effective procedure because:
Slovenskï nèrodnï stredisko pre ﾋudskï prèva
† requesting a referral can concentrate the mind of the presiding judge and ensure that she/he gives proper consideration to the complaint, especially to the fact that it raises issues of Euro-pean rights;
Vyþþie uvedenï mo™nosti ochrany a nèpravy v própadoch diskriminècie, própadne inïho poruþovania zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania, nie sÿ vyｲerpèvajÿce.
† national bodies, particularly public bodies, are impressed by its high profile and may take steps to avoid the exposure of discrimination at national level to pan-European scrutiny;
Poþkodenï osoby alebo svedkovia takïhoto zaobchèdzania majÿ mo™nosﾝ obrètiﾝ sa aj na ｵalþie inþtitÿcie, ktor̅m sa sóce mo™no ÿplne nepodaró zabezpeｲiﾝ nèpravu v konkrïtnom própade, avþak ktor̅ch informovanosﾝ o própadoch diskriminècie mú™e napomúcﾝ zlepþeniu situècie v tejto oblasti na Slovensku.
† the European Court is the only body that can give a definitive interpretation of the terms used in the directives.
Stredisko je okrem toho oprèvnenï zastupovaﾝ ÿｲastnóka v konanó vo veciach poruþenia zèsady rovnakïho zaobchèdzania.
However, this is a specialised procedure and expert EU lawyers familiar with its use need to be retained.
Stredisko tie™ ka™doroｲne vypracÿva a uverejﾏuje sprèvu o dodr™iavanó ﾋudsk̅ch prèv v SR.
The Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament can receive petitions from citizens of the Union who wish the committee to investigate their complaint that their rights under European Union law are not being properly respected.
Salþou z mo™nostó, hoci len v obmedzenom rozsahu, je obrètiﾝ sa na verejnïho ochrancu prèv (ombudsmana), ktor̅ sa podieﾋa na ochrane zèkladn̅ch prèv a slobúd fyzick̅ch a prèvnick̅ch osúb pri konanó, rozhodovanó alebo neｲinnosti orgènov verejnej sprèvy, ak je ich konanie, rozho-dovanie alebo neｲinnosﾝ v rozpore s prèvnym poriadkom alebo princópmi demokratickïho a prèv-neho þtètu.
Alerting the European Commission to discriminatory administrative practices
Ak by teda konanóm, rozhodovanóm alebo neｲinnosﾝou orgènu verejnej sprèvy doþlo k diskriminècii, potom by sa dotknutè osoba mohla so svojóm podnetom obrètiﾝ na ombudsmana.
It is also possible to write directly to the Commission, which may often be a quicker process than petitions.
Verejn̅ ochranca prèv podnet preskÿma, a v própade, ™e zistó poruþenie zèkladn̅ch prèv a slobúd, navrhne orgènu verejnej sprèvy, ktor̅ ich poruþil, opatrenia na vykonanie nèpravy.
This could be done with a view to encouraging the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against the offending State.
Okrem toho ombudsman ka™doroｲne predkladè parlamentu sprèvu o svojej ｲinnosti, kde informuje o svojej ｲinnosti a uvèdza informècie o dodr™iavanó zèkladn̅ch prèv a slobúd.
The Commission and the Parliament are bound by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights' provi-sion on the right to good administration (Article 41).
Mo™nosti vypl̅vajÿce z medzinèrodn̅ch zèvêzkov SR
† Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a rea-sonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union.
Slovenskè republika je signatèrom viacer̅ch medzinèrodn̅ch dohovorov, ktorï vo svojich usta-noveniach zakazujÿ diskriminèciu.
‹ the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken;
Sÿ nimi napróklad Dohovor UNESCO proti diskriminècii vo vzde-lanó (1960), Medzinèrodn̅ dohovor o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem rasovej diskriminècie (1966), Dohovor o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem diskriminècie ™ien (1979) a Medzinèrodn̅ pakt o obｲian-skych a politick̅ch prèvach (1966).
‹ the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate interest of confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy;
Slovenskè republika je tie™ signatèrom viacer̅ch dohovorov prijat̅ch na púde Medzinèrodnej organizècie prèce, ktorï sa zaoberajÿ diskriminèciou.
† Every person has the right to have the Community make good any damage caused by its insti-tutions or by its servants in the performance of their duties, in accordance with the general principles common to the laws of the Member States.
V própade Dohovoru o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem diskriminècie ™ien a Dohovoru o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem rasovej diskriminècie sa Slovenskè republika zaviazala, ™e bude v̅borom, ktorï boli zriadenï na zèklade t̅chto dohovorov, pravidelne predkladaﾝ sprèvy o plnenó t̅chto dohovo-rov.
† Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the languages of the Treaties and must have an answer in the same language.
V própade Dohovoru o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem diskriminècie ™ien je tèto povinnosﾝ stano-venè v þtvorroｲn̅ch intervaloch.
In addition, when all effective national legal remedies have been exhausted, a person may, if the case concerns issues covered by the European Convention on Human Rights, apply to the Euro-pean Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
Podanï sprèvy potom v̅bory zriadenï na zèklade t̅chto dohovorov prehodnocu-jÿ a na ich zèklade vydèvajÿ signatèrom dohovorov (teda þtètom) odporÿｲania.
`The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a nation-al minority, property, birth or other status.'
s Uistiﾝ sa, ™e ka™d̅ jednotlivec mè prèvo na efektóvnu ochranu pred rasovou diskriminèciou, ako aj prèvo na primeranÿ nèhradu alebo zadosﾝuｲinenie v própadoch diskriminècie.
Collective complaints can also be made under the Council of Europe's European Social Charter.
V tejto sÿvis-losti by mali maﾝ obete rasovo motivovan̅ch trestn̅ch ｲinov lepþó próstup k bezplatnej prèvnej pomoci.
It should be noted that the European Convention on Human Rights is part of our law through the European Convention act, Chapter 319 of the Laws of Malta.
s Pokraｲovaﾝ v zlepþovanó vzﾝahov medzi rùmskymi a nerùmskymi komunitami, a to s cieﾋom zvyþovania tolerancie a prekonèvania predsudkov a negatóvnych stereotypov.
Where the State is a party to the first Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, or has accepted the right of individual petition under the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination or the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimi-nation Against Women, complaints can be brought to those committees.
s Vo vþetk̅ch plènovan̅ch projektoch a programoch braﾝ vo zv̅þenej miere do ÿvahy situèciu rùmskych ™ien, ktorï sÿ ｲasto obeﾝami dvojitej diskriminècie.
NGOs should also ensure that they alert the committees which examine the State's periodic reports under the ICCPR, CERD, CEDAW and the Convention on the Rights of the Child to instanc-es of discrimination.
s Predchèdzaﾝ segregècii rùmskych detó, avþak za predpokladu, ™e mo™nosﾝ bilingvèlneho vzde-lèvania alebo vzdelèvania v materinskom jazyku zostèva pre rùmske deti otvorenè.
Everyone in a NGO who takes up the case of an individual or a group of individuals must be aware of the need to observe high standards of professionalism, including confidentiality and efficient management of case files.
s Uviesﾝ legislatóvu zakazujÿcu diskriminèciu v zamestnanó a pracovnoprèvnych vzﾝahoch do ™ivota tak, aby bola plne uplatﾏovanè v praxi, a prijaﾝ ｵalþie opatrenia, najmê v oblasti odbor-nej própravy, ktor̅mi sa znó™i nezamestnanosﾝ Rùmov.
Discrimination in the national context
Diskriminècia vo vnÿtroþtètnom kontexte s Implementovaﾝ politiky a projekty, ktor̅mi sa znó™i segregècia Rùmov v oblasti b̅vania.
The national trainers will decide whether this anonymity is neces-sary/appropriate.
s Pokraｲovaﾝ v implementècii projektov a programov v oblasti zdravia Rùmov.
Possibly, in Malta, the most widespread grounds of discrimination are race and sexual orientation.
Okrem toho sa na zèklade t̅chto dohovorov mú™u podèvaﾝ aj tzv. tieﾏovï sprèvy.
Unlike several other minorities, gay and lesbian people are found in every strata of society, in one's family, in one's circle of friends, at work, etc.
Ide o sprèvy o dodr™iavanó t̅chto dohovorov a opatreniach prijat̅ch na ich zèklade, ktorï sÿ vypracovanï inþtitÿciami nezèvisl̅mi od vlèdy konkrïtnej krajiny.
Yet discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is felt everywhere.
T̅mito nezèvisl̅mi inþtitÿciami sÿ najｲastej-þie mimovlèdne organizècie.
One of the major reasons why there is so much intolerance against gay and lesbian people in Malta, is Malta's strong conservative Catholic beliefs.
Na Slovensku boli vypracovanï tieﾏovï sprèvy k obidvom spomóna-n̅m dohovorom.
In Malta heterosexuality is seen as the norm whereas homosexuality is seen as a taboo. Furthermore, until recently legislation in Malta did not make any reference to sexual orientation.
Prève vypracovèvanie tieﾏov̅ch sprèv mú™e pre mimovlèdne organizècie vytvè-raﾝ priestor, na zèklade ktorïho mú™u vstupovaﾝ do diania sÿvisiaceho s antidiskriminèciou a ovplyvﾏovaﾝ ho.
In March 2002, a delegation from the Malta Gay Rights Movement met with the Archbishop of Malta. This was the first time that the highest representative of the local Catholic Church ever held an official meeting with a gay movement.
V própade Dohovoru o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem diskriminècie ™ien a Dohovoru o odstrènenó vþetk̅ch foriem rasovej diskriminècie je Slovenskè republika signatèrom aj tzv. opｲn̅ch protoko-lov, ktor̅m uznala kompetenciu v̅borov na prejednèvanie sﾝa™nostó jednotlivcov alebo skupón jednotlivcov na zèklade t̅chto dohovorov.
In May 2003, a delegation from the Malta Gay Rights Movement met with the then Minister for Social Policy to discuss the lack of specific mention of sexual orientation as a ground of discrimination.
V praxi to znamenè, ™e osoba, ktorè sa domnieva, ™e boli poruþenï jej prèva garantovanï t̅mito dohovormi, mú™e podaﾝ sﾝa™nosﾝ na þtèt.
Consequently, the first specific mention of sexual orientation in relation to discrimination was introduced in Maltese legislation by virtue of Legal Notice 297 of 2003.
Rozhodnutia uveden̅ch v̅borov majÿ siln̅ politick̅ vplyv a priamo púsobia na þtèt, aby zabezpeｲil nèpravu protiprèvneho stavu a vytvoril podmienky, aby sa poruþenia neopakovali.
One of the areas wherein no legislation has been introduced relates to the rights of same-sex couples. Although there have recently been extensive amendments to the civil code of Malta in relation to personal rights, no specific rights were extended to same sex couples.
Dúle™itï webstrènky a inþtitÿcie: w w w . c o n o c u r t . s k S t r è n k a àstavnïho sÿdu SR.Adresa:àstavn̅ sÿd Slovenskej republiky Hlavnè 72 042 65 Koþice w w w . e c h r . c o e . i n t S t r è n k a Eurùpskeho sÿdu pre ﾋudskï prèva v Þtrasburgu.
Combating discrimination › A training manual
Boj proti diskriminècii › Odbornè próruｲka w w w . j u s t i c e . g o v . s k S t r è n k a Ministerstva spravodlivosti SR.
Politicians, NGOs and top governmental officials have teamed up in a chorus of disapproval towards such increasing xenophobia.
Obsahuje informècie o slu™bèch obｲanom › napróklad o tom, ako zóskaﾝ bezplatnï prèvne rady, o oslobodenó od poplatkov, o tom, ako podaﾝ ™alobu, odvolanie atｵ.
The negative attitude of a `substantial' part of society towards irregular migration, often brought about by ignorance, should not be underestimated either.
Tie™ obsahuje informècie o Eurùpskom sÿde pre ﾋudskï prèva v Þtrasburgu a o tom, ako sa na tento sÿd obrètiﾝ.
Another disturbing phenomenon is that several foreigners, particularly immigrants/refugees are being exploited by their employers and given inferior work conditions ̌ a convenient way to create cheap labour.
w w w . o b c a n a d e m o k r a c i a . s k S t r è n k a zdru™enia Obｲan a demokracia; zdru™enie poskytuje prèvnu pomoc v própadoch poruþo-vania ﾋudsk̅ch prèv, najmê ak z t̅chto própadov mú™e vzniknÿﾝ precedentn̅ própad, ktor̅ mú™e v budÿcnosti znamenaﾝ pozitóvny posun v rozhodovanó sÿdov a ostatn̅ch orgènov verejnej sprè-vy v oblasti ﾋudsk̅ch prèv a verejnïho zèujmu.
Certain press reports have indicated that some employers, especially in the construction industry, even go as far as reporting to the police on payday the immigrants that they themselves had employed illegally so as to avoid paying them. There have also been reports of ill-treatment of refugees who had asked their employer for the payment of their wages.
Zdru™enie tie™ vydèva publikècie k rúznym ﾋud-skoprèvnym tïmam (vrètane otèzok diskriminècie), a ponÿka trïningy v tejto oblasti.Adresa:Dobroviｲova 13811 09 Bratislava w w w . p o r a d n a - p r a v a . cz S t r è n k a Poradne pre obｲianstvo, obｲianske a ﾋudskï prèva sódliacej v Peskej republike; okrem inïho poskytuje zaujómavï informècie o ÿspeþn̅ch própadoch diskriminècie.