natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
From now on, systematic use will be made of offsetting (Article 73), whereby any claim that the Communities have on a debtor who himself has a claim on the Communities that is confirmed, quantified and due will be offset as to an equivalent amount.
Uplat┵ovanie kompenzâcie sa stâva systematickþm (┘lânok 73) a uplat┵uje sa a Š do vþùky poh┱adâvok Spolo┘enstiev vo┘i akêmuko┱vek d l Š n î -
Article 72(2) also confirms that the institution can `formally establish an amount as receiv-able from persons other than States by means of a decision which is enforceable'.
ﾚlânok 72 ods. 2 zârove┵ potvrdzuje, Še inùtitúcie majú m o Š n o s ╃ ‡pîsomne potvrdi╃ poh┱a-dâvku, ktorú musia uhradi╃ inê osoby n e Š ùtâty formou vykonate┱nêho rozhodnutiaƒ.
This possibility was provided for in Article 256 of the EC Treaty, but no implementing regulations had been issued.
Tâto m o Š n o s ╃ bola ustanovenâ ┘lânkom 256 Zmluvy, ale podrobnê pravidlâ jej uplat┵ovania neboli upravenê Šiadnym prâvnym predpisom.
In addition, the new financial regulations introduce automatic collection of late payment interest for any debt not repaid on the due date (62), and significantly increase the amount
Novþm nariadenîm o rozpo┘tovþch pravidlâch sa zavâdza automatickê vyberanie úrokov z omeùkania pre akêko┱vek poh┱adâvky, ktorê neboli splatenê v termîne splatnosti62 a vþ-
Contractual warranties for better contract management
Zmluvnê zâruky pre lepùie m a na Š o v a n i e zmlúv
Payment of advances or granting of pre-financing without consideration at the time of payment constitutes an appreciable risk for the Communities' financial interests.
Vyplatenie zâloh alebo udelenie pre d b e Š n ê h o financovania bez poskytnutia zâruky druhou stranou v okamihu vyplatenia predstavuje nezanedbate┱nê riziko pre finan┘nê zâujmy Spo-lo┘enstva.
However, such payments are an essential tool for carrying out certain actions that meet Community policy objectives.
Tento nâstroj je nevyhnutnþ na realizâciu ur┘itþch akciî, ktorê zodpovedajú cie-┱om politîk Spolo┘enstva.
The new financial regulations, and in particular the regulation laying down detailed rules for its implementation, provide for a number of measures that miti-gate this risk.
Novê nariadenie o rozpo┘tovþch pravidlâch a predovùetkþm na-riadenie, ktorþm sa ustanovujú podrobnê pravidlâ na jeho vykonâvanie, stanovuje ur┘itê opatrenia, ktorê toto riziko z n i Š u j ú .
Thus, in the cases provided for by the implementing rules, the contractors or beneficiaries must provide a guarantee in advance before receiving pre-financing.
V prîpadoch ustanovenþch vykonâvacîmi pravidlami musia zmluvnê strany alebo prîjemcovia finan┘nþch prostriedkov z l o Š i ╃ zâruku eùte pred zîskanîm pre d b e Š n ê h o financovania.
The Commission's departments, through standard contracts or conventions (including agreements with candidate and third countries in the area of foreign aid or participation in Community programmes), ensure that effective provisions on recovery are included.
Útvary Komisie sa prostrednîctvom ùtandardnþch ustanovenî zmlúv alebo dohovorov (vrâtane dohôd s kandidâtskymi krajinami a tretîmi krajinami v oblasti vonkajùej pomoci alebo ú┘asti na programoch Spolo┘enstva) presved┘ia o implementâcii ú┘innþch ustanove-nî tþkajúcich sa vymâhania neoprâvnene vyplatenþch súm.
Recovery by joining a civil action to criminal proceedings and precautionary measures under Member States' legislation
Vymâhanie formou pripojenia sa k trestnêmu konaniu a zabezpe┡ovacie opatrenia v prâvnych predpisoch ┡lenskþch ùtâtov
The study published in last year's report (64) showed that, in the majority of Member States, the Commission is entitled to join a civil action to ongoing criminal proceedings with a view to obtaining damage to secure recovery of Community entitlements related to direct expenditure.
Ùtúdia uverejnenâ v sprâve za minulþ rok64 sved┘î o tom, Še vo vä┘ùine ┘lenskþch ùtâtov sa m ô Š e Komisia pripoji╃ k trestnêmu konaniu s cie┱om zîska╃ nâhradu ùkôd a úroky na za-bezpe┘enie uplatnenia finan┘nþch nârokov Spolo┘enstva spojenþch s priamymi vþdavka-mi.
Launching a civil action within criminal proceedings is considered an effec-tive instrument to facilitate the Commission's efforts to recover debts in the field of direct expenditure.
Pripojenie sa k trestnêmu konaniu sa pokladâ za ú┘innþ nâstroj, ktorþ Komisii u┱ah┘u-je prâcu v súvislosti s vymâhanîm poh┱adâvok v oblasti priamych vþdavkov.
It offers several advantages, including the shortening of legal proceedings.
Poskytuje nieko┱ko vþhod, najmä skrâtenie lehôt konania.
In Member States having common law systems (65), although the Commission would not be entitled to launch `civil action within criminal proceedings', it would nevertheless be allowed to make a request for a compensation order.
V ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch, ktorê majú prâvny systêm pod┱a vùeobecnêho prâva65, sa Komisia n e m ô Š e pripoji╃ k trestnêmu konaniu, ale mâ m o Š n o s ╃ poda╃ Šiados╃ o kompenzâciu.
The 2003 report also established that the Commission may usually apply for precautionary measures (66) as from the investigation phase of criminal proceedings.
V sprâve z roku 2003 sa ┛alej uvâdza, Še Komisia m ô Š e vo vùeobecnosti p o Š i a d a ╃ o zabez-pe┘ovacie opatrenia66 od fâzy vyùetrovania v râmci trestnêho konania.
Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, Article 86.The rate of late payment interest applicable is the reference rate of the European Central Bank plus 7 percentage points for service and supply contracts and the reference rate plus 3.5 percentage points in other cases.
2342/2002, ktorþm sa ustanovujú podrobnê pravidlâ na vykonâvanie nariadenia Rady (ES, Euratom) ┘. 1605/2002, Ú. v.
This is a significant increase with respect to the previous rate (the reference rate plus 1.5 percentage points).COM(2004) 573.Ireland, United Kingdom.
ES L 357, 31.12.2002, ┘lânok 86.Uplat┵ovanâ sadzba úroku z omeùkania je referen┘nâ sadzba Európskej centrâlnej banky zvþùenâ o 7 bodov v râmci trhu s l u Š i e b a dodâvok a o 3,5 bodu v ostatnþch prîpadoch.
Precautionary measures are those measures which the prosecutor or the court may order to prevent the defendant from dispersing his assets before the court reaches its decision.
Oproti predchâdzajúcej sadzbe, ktorâ sa rovnala referen┘nej sadzbe zvþùenej o 1,5 %, ide o jednozna┘nê zvþùenie.KOM(2004) 573.Îrsko, Spojenê krâ┱ovstvo.Zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenia sú opatrenia, ktorê prokuratúra alebo sudca m ô Š e nariadi╃ v snahe zabrâni╃ o b Š a l o v a n ê m u , aby rozptþlil svoje aktîva skôr, n e Š súd vynesie rozhodnutie.
They include the freezing and seizing of the defendant's assets.
Tieto opatrenia zahr┵ujú zmrazenie a zabavenie majetkov vyùetrovanej osoby.
2 7 involving an economic operator defrauding the Commission.
Dotaznîk pre d l o Š e n þ ┘lenskþm ùtâtom sa vz╃ahoval na praktickþ prîpad hospodârskeho subjektu, ktorþ sa dopustil podvo-du, ktorþm poùkodil Komisiu.
Two Member States were not able to provide answers to this part of the questionnaire (67).
Dva ┘lenskê ùtâty nevedeli na otâzky uvedenê v tejto ┘asti dotaznîka67 odpoveda╃.
The full text of the responses is available in the form of a Commission services' working document.
Vùetky odpovede sú uvedenê v pracovnom dokumente útvarov Ko-misie.
Although certain common trends can be identified, the national legal systems provide for very different conditions under which the Commission's application for civil action can be launched.
Ak aj existujú podobnosti, vnútroùtâtne prâvne systêmy ustanovujú ve┱mi rôznorodê pod-mienky, ┘o sa tþka podania ob┘ianskoprâvnej Šaloby Komisiou.
This highlights the need for the Commission to have close cooperation with national judicial authorities.
Pre Komisiu z toho vyplþ-va nutnos╃ u Š ù e j spoluprâce so súdnymi orgânmi.
The 2004 report also gives the Commission a better under-standing of the conditions under which applications for precautionary measures should be made following national legislations.
Sprâva z roku 2004 Komisii u m o Š n i l a aj lepùie sa oboznâmi╃ s podmienkami podania nâvrhu na zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenie, ktorþch splnenie v y Š a d u j ú vnútroùtâtne prâvne poriadky.
Civil action within criminal proceedings.
Pripojenie sa k trestnêmu konaniu. áiados╃ o pripojenie sa k trestnêmu konaniu.
The application for `civil action within criminal proceedings'.
Vo vä┘-ùine ┘lenskþch ùtâtov musî Šiados╃ poda╃ Komisia.
In Sweden, the prosecutor is entitled to submit the claim.
Vo Ùvêdsku túto Šiados╃ podâva v Š d y prokuratúra.
In Finland and Portugal, it can be made by the prosecutor if he considers it appropriate.
Vo Fînsku a v Portugalsku m ô Š e prokuratúra poda╃ takúto Šiados╃ v prîpa-doch, ke┛ to pokladâ za vhodnê.
In this case, there will be no need for the Commission to make an application.
V tomto prîpade nie je nutnê, aby Šiados╃ podala Komi-sia.
Finland pointed out that, if the Commission applies for damages on the basis of facts which are not shown in the charge drawn up by the prosecutor, those facts should be presented in the claim together with the supporting evidence.
Fînsko vùak zdôraznilo, Še ak Komisia p o Š a d u j e nâhradu ùkody opierajúc sa o fakty, ktorê nie sú obsiahnutê v o b Š a l o v a c o m spise pre d l o Š e n o m prokuratúrou, musî poda╃ Šia-dos╃, v ktorej presne uvedie tieto skuto┘nosti, ako aj dôkazy tþchto skuto┘nostî.
In certain Member States, it is also necessary to state all the facts supporting the object of
V niektorþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch sa p o Š a d u j e aj uvedenie vùetkþch skuto┘nostî na podporu
68) and/or the amount sought for compensation (
Šiadosti68a/alebo sumy, ktorâ sa p o Š a d u j e ako nâhrada ùkody69.
Member States (70), the link of causality between the fraud and the loss to the Community budget must be clearly demonstrated in the application.
V niektorþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch70sa navyùe p o Š a d u j e , aby v Šiadosti bola jasne uvedenâ prî┘innâ súvislos╃ medzi podvodom a stratou na rozpo┘te Spolo┘enstva. Iba dva ┘lenskê ùtâty71 uviedli, Še Šiados╃ sa m ô Š e poda╃ po za┘atî pojednâvania.
Requirements as to evidence in relation to civil action within criminal proceedings.
P o Š i a d a v k y na dôkazy v prîpade pripojenia sa k trestnêmu konaniu.
All the Member States who answered apply the rule of evidence by all means, whether by a witness statement or in a written report.
Vùetky ┘lenskê ùtâty, ktorê odpovedali, uplat┵ujú princîp slobody dôkazu bez oh┱adu na to, ┘i ide o vypo┘úvanie svedkov, alebo pîsomnú sprâvu.
However, the courts are also bound to apply the rule of the free assessment of evidence.
Súdy sú vùak povinnê uplat┵ova╃ aj pravidlo vo┱nêho po-súdenia dôkazu.
This means that no piece of evidence in relation to the damage produced by the Commission, even a report of a certified auditor, might be in it-self sufficient enough to prove an infringement of a criminal provision by the contractor.
To znamenâ, Še Šiadny dôkaz pre d l o Š e n þ Komisiou v súvislosti so ùko-dou, vrâtane audîtorskej sprâvy autorizovanêho audîtora, nemusî sâm osebe sta┘i╃ na do-kâzanie toho, Še zmluvnâ strana sa dopustila poruùenia predpisov.
Even if it is the rule that evidence may be provided by all means, three Member States indicated that there are limits to the admissibility of a report of a certified auditor.
Hoci dôkaz sa m ô Š e pre d l o Š i ╃ akþmiko┱vek prostriedkami, tri ┘lenskê ùtâty uviedli, Še exis-tujú obmedzenia oh┱adne prîpustnosti sprâvy ú┘tovnêho znalca (niekedy je nutnê, aby
(Sometimes, it is necessary that the report be written by a registered expert (72), or one that has been appointed by the court (73)).
72 alebo znalec vymenovanþ súdom
In Italy, a quantitative limit is imposed on private parties, and therefore also on the Commission: they may appoint up to a maximum of two experts to give testimonies to the court.
V Ta-liansku sa stranâm, a teda aj Komisii ukladâ kvantitatîvne obmedzenie: na ú┘ely dokazova-nia pre súdom m ô Š u by╃ uvedenî iba dvaja znalci.
In other Member States, auditors' reports are freely admissible, but there are special condi-tions for the treatment of this type of evidence (74).
V ostatnþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch sú sprâvy ú┘tovnþch znalcov vo┱ne prîpustnê, ale ich posu-dzovanie prebieha za ur┘itþch osobitnþch podmienok74.
It should also be noted that the answers of some Member States were not detailed enough to be able to establish the essential points to be included in a Commission's application to conduct a `civil action within criminal proceedings'.Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Italy, Sweden.Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia.France, Hungary, Poland.Netherlands, Slovakia.Czech Republic.Poland.
Treba zârove┵ uvies╃, Še odpovede niektorþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtov neboli dos╃ podrobnê, aby u m o Š - n i l i ur┘i╃ hlavnê informâcie, ktorê musî Komisia uvies╃ do svojej Šiadosti o pripojenie sa k trestnêmu konaniu.ﾚeskâ republika, Grêcko, Taliansko, Nemecko, Ùvêdsko.ﾚeskâ republika, Grêcko, Taliansko, Lotyùsko, Slovensko.Francúzsko, Ma┛arsko, Po┱sko.Holandsko, Slovensko.ﾚeskâ republika.Po┱sko.
The expert must be a court expert or a person who is known to possess adequate knowledge in a given field.Thus, in Sweden, the report must be presented in person during the hearings.
Expert musî by╃ súdnym znalcom alebo osobou pokladanou za kompetentnú v danej oblasti.Vo Ùvêdsku sa sprâva musî osobne pre d l o Š i ╃ po┘as pojednâvania.
In Slovenia, the court may appoint a financial expert to verify the document.
V Slovinsku m ô Š e súd vymenova╃ finan┘nêho znalca, ktorþ overî dokument.
Precautionary measures.
Zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenia.
All Member States which allow `civil action within criminal pro-ceedings' also permit applications for precautionary, or safeguarding, measures.
Vùetky ┘lenskê ùtâty, ktorê povo┱ujú pripojenie sa k trestnêmu konaniu, povo┱ujú aj Šiadosti o zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenia.
Initiator of precautionary measures.
Podâvate┱ nâvrhu na zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenie.
The general rule is that it is the damaged party, and therefore the Commission, which must initiate the application before the public prosecu- tor or the court (75).
Vo vùeobecnosti mâ nâvrh na zabezpe┘ova-cie opatrenie poda╃ na prokuratúru alebo sudcovi75 poùkodenâ strana, teda Komisia.
Only two Member States reported that it is possible for both the Commission and the prosecutor to apply for a precautionary measure during the trial (76).
Iba dva ┘lenskê ùtâty uviedli, Še tak Komisia, ako aj prokuratúra m ô Š u po┘as procesu poda╃ nâvrh na zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenie76.
Application for precautionary measures.
Nâvrh na zabezpe┘ovacie opatrenie.
The obligatory information to be included in the application for precautionary measures varies greatly from one Member State to another.
Zâkladnê údaje, ktorê musî nâvrh obsahova╃, sa v jed-notlivþch ┘lenskþch krajinâch ve┱mi lîùia.
Some Member States (77) do not impose obligations concerning the application.
Niektorê krajiny77neukladajú v tomto smere
At the opposite end of the spectrum, the application must sometimes be very detailed, including for example the legal basis for the application, a description of the relevant facts, evidence of dispersal of assets, and a description of the contractor's known assets together with their location.
Šiadne povinnosti. Naopak, v niektorþch krajinâch musî by╃ nâvrh ve┱mi podrobnþ a musî obsahova╃ naprîklad zâkonnþ zâklad, o ktorþ sa opiera, opis relevantnþch skuto┘nostî, dô-kaz o rozptþlenî majetku a opis poznatkov o majetku zmluvnej strany a jeho situâcii.
Slovakia imposes the condition that the application includes a proposal of a pre-cautionary measure.
Slo-vensko v y Š a d u j e , aby nâvrh obsahoval nâvrh zebezpe┘ovacieho opatrenia.
As far as the risk of disappearance of assets and consequently the impossibility of recovery is concerned, the burden of proof will generally fall on the injured party, that is to say the Commission (78).
ﾚo sa tþka rizika rozptþlenia ┘astî majetku, a teda n e m o Š n o s t i vymâhania, dôkaznê bremeno spo┘îva vo vùeobecnosti na poùkodenej strane, t. j. na Komisii78.
In this respect, it will always be in the interest of the Commission to submit an application with as much detail as possible.
VŠdy je teda v zâujme Komisie, aby pre d l o Š i l a nâvrh, ktorþ obsahuje ┘o m o Š n o najviac podrobnostî.
Finally, it should be noted that an equivalent of precautionary measures may be found in certain Member States who have
Nakoniec treba pozname-na╃, Še ekvivalent zabezpe┘ovacîch opatrenî existuje v niektorþch ┘lenskþch ùtâtoch, ktorê majú
In 2002, the total arrears of recoverable amounts relating to irregularities in the EAGGF Guarantee Section were estimated at EUR 2.2 billion, according to data provided by Member States under Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (81).
V roku 2002 sa celkovþ nedoplatok súm, ktorê mali by╃ vrâtenê v súvislosti s nezrovnalos-╃ami v oblasti EPUZF « zâru┘nâ sekcia, odhadoval na 2,2 miliardy eur pod┱a údajov oznâ-menþch ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi na zâklade ┘lânkov 3 a 5 nariadenia (EHS) ┘. 595/9181.
The Recovery Task Force was charged with clari-fying the situation of unrecovered debt and drawing up decisions on financial liability under the formal clearance procedure in the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
Úlohou TFR bolo objasni╃ situâciu oh┱adne nedobytnosti poh┱adâvok a pripravi╃ rozhodnutia o finan┘nej zodpovednosti v râmci formâlneho konania vo veci vyrovnania ú┘tov v oblasti EPUZF « zâru┘nâ sekcia.
It started its audit work in 2003 for unrecovered amounts dating from before 1999 exceeding EUR 500 000 each.
Skupina za┘ala v roku 2003 vykonâva╃ audit v súvislosti s prîpadmi súm, ktorê neboli vrâtenê do r. 1999 a z ktorþch k a Š d â prevy-ùovala 500 000 eur.
This exercise, involving nine Member States, revealed that the total amount of unre-covered debt was EUR 765 million (83).
V râmci tejto aktivity, ktorâ sa tþkala 9 ┘lenskþch ùtâtov, sa zistilo, Še celkovâ vþùka nevrâtenþch súm je 765 miliónov eur83.
At the end of 2004, the clearance procedure was initiated by the Agriculture and Rural Development DG; formal letters under Article 8 of
Koncom roka 2004 vyrovnanie ú┘-tov sa mohlo za┘a╃ aj na GR pre po┱nohospodârstvo: zainteresovanþm ┘lenskþm ùtâtom boli pod┱a ┘lânku 8 nariadenia (ES) ┘.
Belgium, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Finland, Sweden.Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Rakúsko, Belgicko, ﾚeskâ republika, Grêcko, Ùpanielsko, Fînsko, Francúzsko, Ma┛arsko, Taliansko, Lotyùsko, Portugal-sko, Ùvêdsko, Slovinsko.ﾚeskâ republika a Slovensko.
In the pre-trial proceedings, the prosecutor may secure the claim even without application by the injured if the protection of the latter's interest calls for it and, in particular, if there is a danger of omission.Belgium, Greece, Italy, Austria.Finland is the only reported exception to this rule: application for a precautionary measure such as a transfer prohibi-tion or seizure will not require any evidence of that risk.
Po┘as fâzy vyùetrovania m ô Š e prokuratúra poda╃ Šiados╃ aj bez Šaloby poùkodenej strany, ak ide o jej zâujmy a najmä, ak hrozî riziko opomenutia z jej strany.Rakúsko, Belgicko, Grêcko, Taliansko.Vþnimku z tohto pravidla oznâmilo iba Fînsko: uplatnenie do┘asnêho opatrenia akþm je zâkaz prevodu alebo zhabanie si n ev y Š a d u j e dôkaz o riziku.
In principle, it is enough to claim that the risk is rather likely.
V zâsade sta┘î uvies╃ v nâvrhu, Še riziko je dos╃ pravdepodobnê. áiados╃ vùak musî obsa-hova╃ aj opis, ako sa riziko v danom prîpade prejavuje.Anglicko a Wales.Ùkótsko.Ú. v.
However, the application should describe how the risk is manifesting itself in the case in question.England and Wales.Scotland.OJ L 67, 14.3.1991.COM(2002) 671 final.This amount does not include 32 cases communicated before 1999 for an amount exceeding EUR 500 000, which revealed inconsistencies when the communications were compared with the results of the audit.
ES L 67, 14.3.1991KOM(2002) 671 kone┘nê znenie.Tâto suma nezahr┵uje 32 prîpadov, ktorê boli oznâmenê pred rokom 1999 a prevyùovali 500 000 eur, u ktorþch sa zistili nezrovnalosti pri porovnâvanî oznâmenî s vþsledkami auditu.
Priority will be given to dealing with these cases in 2005.
Tieto prîpady sa budú prednostne rieùi╃ po┘as roka 2005.
The RTF also began the audits of around 3 400 cases for an amount of under EUR 500 000 each, which had been communicated before 1999 and not recovered to date (the total financial impact was estimated at around EUR 200 million).
TFR zârove┵ za┘ala vykonâva╃ audity tþkajúce sa asi 3 400 prîpadov, ktorþch jednotlivê hodnoty nedosahujú 500 000 eur a ktorê boli oznâmenê pred rokom 1999 a do dneùnêho d┵a neboli spätne zîskanê (odhadovanâ celkovâ finan┘nâ strata je asi 200 miliónov eur).
The Exter-nal Communications Registry database, managed by OLAF, contains all the communi-cations sent by the Member States under Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 on irregularities relating to the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
Databâza ECR (External Communications Registry), ktorú spravuje OLAF, obsahuje vùet-ky oznâmenia odovzdanê ┘lenskþmi ùtâtmi na zâklade ┘lânkov 3 a 5 nariadenia (EHS) ┘.
The Member States were asked to verify and complete these data, fill in an electronic self-assessment form on the results of the recovery measures, and submit a proposal on dealing with unrecov-ered amounts.
595/91 o nezrovnalostiach tþkajúcich sa zâru┘nej sekcie EPUZF. ﾚlenskê ùtâty boli vy-zvanê, aby tieto údaje prekontrolovali a doplnili, aby vyplnili elektronickþ formulâr na vlastnê vyhodnotenie vþsledkov opatrenî na vymâhanie a podali nâvrh na prevzatie nevrâ-tenþch súm.
The RTF will verify the data sent in 2005; the formal clearance proce-dure will begin after completion of the verifications and any necessary supplementary audits.
TFR overî údaje dodanê v priebehu roka 2005 a hne┛ po uskuto┘nenî kontrol a prîpadnþch dodato┘nþch auditov sa m ô Š e za┘a╃ formâlne vyrovnanie.
The RTF's work has resulted in better use of the data communicated by the Member States in line with the Commission's undertaking to `improve the quality of the available data relating to irregular payments under the CAP' in its response to the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 (84).
Takþto vþ-sledok zodpovedâ snahe o ‡zlepùenie kvality dostupnþch údajov o neregulârnych platbâch v râmci Spolo┘nej po┱nohospodârskej politikyƒ v râmci zâväzku, ktorþ Komisia uviedla vo svojich odpovediach na mimoriadnu sprâvu ┘. 3/2004 Dvora audîtorov84.
In the area of the Structural Funds, the recovery of unduly paid amounts due to irregular-ity or fraud is carried out by Member States.
V oblasti ùtrukturâlnych fondov zabezpe┘ujú vymâhanie súm, ktorê boli vyplatenê neoprâvne-ne v dôsledku nezrovnalosti alebo podvodu, ┘lenskê ùtâty.
The recovery of those amounts at Commu-nity level can be done by reduction or cancellation of the financial contribution with the possibility of a transfer of funds to other operations when the programme concerned has not yet been closed.
Vrâtenie tþchto súm Komisii sa mô-Še uskuto┘ni╃ formou z n î Š e n i a lebo zruùenia finan┘nej spoluú┘asti s m o Š n o s ╃ o u novêho udele-nia finan┘nþch prostriedkov na inê operâcie v prîpade, Še prîsluùnþ program sa eùte neskon┘il.
The programmes co-financed by the Structural Funds are multiannual and based on interim payments.
Programy spolufinancovanê ùtrukturâlnymi fondmi sú viacro┘nê a prebiehajú na zâklade p r i e b e Š n þ c h platieb.
Recovery of amounts unduly paid may take place before or after conclusion of the programme.
K vymâhaniu neoprâvnene vyplatenþch súm m ô Š e dôjs╃ pred uzavre-tîm programu alebo po jeho uzavretî.
For the 1994«99 programming period, the deadline for presentation of the request for final payment to the Commission was 31 March 2003.
Pokia┱ ide o programovê obdobie 1994 « 1999, naj-neskorùîm termînom na pre d l o Š e n i e Komisii Šiadosti o kone┘nú platbu bol 31. marec 2003.
In that period, about 1 000 programmes were co-financed by the Community for a total of around EUR 159 billion (85).
Po┘as tohto obdobia Spolo┘enstvo spolufinancovalo takmer 1 000 programov v hod-note okolo 159 miliârd eur85.