natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The exchange of information is carried out in accordance with a two-pronged procedure which divides the Directive into two distinct but complementary parts.
V̅mena informèció sa uskutoｲﾏuje v sÿlade s dvojstupﾏov̅m postupom, ktor̅ rozdeﾋuje smernicu na dve odliþnï, ale dopl-ﾏujÿce sa ｲasti.
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
àvod: Smernica 98/34/ES, nèstroj transparentnosti pri slu™bèch vnÿtornïho trhu
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
Zaｲiatkom osemdesiatych rokov Komisia, na zèklade nariade-nia Sÿdneho dvora znèmeho ako rozhodnutie v ¶Dijonskom própade• (¶Cassis de Dijonƒ) predstavila novÿ stratïgiu navrh-nutÿ na dokonｲenie vnÿtornïho trhu na zèklade troch koncep-ció:
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
Prvè ｲasﾝ sa t̅ka postupu pri poskytovanó informèció o nov̅ch nèrodn̅ch iniciatóvach, ktorï by mali viesﾝ k formulovaniu nè-rodn̅ch noriem medzi nèrodn̅mi normalizaｲn̅mi orgènmi, eurùpskymi normalizaｲn̅mi orgènmi, menovite CEN (Eurùp-ska organizècia pre normalizèciu), CENELEC (Eurùpska organi-zècia pre normalizèciu v elektrotechnike) a ETSI (Eurùpsky inþti-tÿt pre telekomunikaｲnï normy) a Eurùpskou komisiou.
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
Komisia zverila eurùpskym normalizaｲn̅m orgènom zodpovednosﾝ za implementèciu tohto postupu na zèklade roｲnej zmluvy.
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
› Akceptècia v̅robkov prèvoplatne vyroben̅ch v ostatn̅ch ｲastiach Spoloｲenstva v ka™dom ｲlenskom þtète (¶vzèjomnï uznèvanieƒ);
The second part of the Directive is addressed to the Member States who have agreed to take part in a reciprocal transpar-ency and monitoring system in the regulatory «eld.Thisinitia-tive was original in several ways:
› Harmonizècia obmedzenè na dúle™itï ekonomickï sektory pokr̅vajÿce predovþetk̅m zdravie, bezpeｲnosﾝ a ™ivotnï prostredie;
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
› Próstup zalo™en̅ na prevencii, urｲen̅ na monitorovanie nè-rodn̅ch predpisov.
› The system is of a preventive nature: information is provided when technical regulations relating to products or rules on Information Society services are still at the draft stage, and may be amended in order to conform with the principles of the internal market.
› Systïm mè preventóvny charakter: k poskytovaniu informèció dochèdza vtedy, keｵ sÿ technickï predpisy t̅kajÿce sa v̅-robkov alebo pravidlè slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnosti eþte stèle v nèvrhovej fèze a je mo™nï meniﾝ ich tak, aby zodpo-vedali zèsadèm vnÿtornïho trhu.
Since 1984, Directive 83/189/EEC which, following codi«ca-tion later became Directive 98/34/EC, has laid down a preven-tive mechanism, the scope of which has been progressively extended.
mechanizmus, ktorïho rozsah bol progresóvne rozþirovan̅.
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
V sÿｲasnosti sÿ ｲlenskï þtèty Eurùpskej ÿnie povinnï oznèmiﾝ Komisii a ostatn̅m ｲlensk̅m þtètom ak̅koﾋvek nèvrh technic-kïho predpisu t̅kajÿceho sa v̅robkov a slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnosti pred jeho zaｲlenenóm do nèrodnej legislatóvy.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Koncepcia bola v danom ｲase revoluｲnè a takou aj zostala › do takej miery, ™e Komisia skÿma, ｲi je mo™nï jej rozþórenie aj do in̅ch oblastó.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
› Text poｲas obdobia preruþenia prèc mú™e skÿmaﾝ a monito-rovaﾝ nielen Komisia, ale aj vþetky ｲlenskï þtèty; ｲlenskï þtèty uznèvajÿ v̅hody postupu, ktor̅ umo™ﾏuje vzèjomnï ovplyv-ﾏovanie legislatóvnych procesov.
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Samotnè Zmluva iba zabez-peｲila opatrenie pre retrospektóvne monitorovanie zo strany ｲlensk̅ch þtètov prostrednóctvom pou™óvania ﾝa™kopèdnej-þóch konanó o poruþenó, ktorï ｲlenskï þtèty uplatﾏujÿ iba zriedka.
Directive of 28 March 1983. OJ L 109, 26.4.1983, p.
'1( Smernica z 28. marca 1983. à. v. ES L 109, 26.4.1983, s.
8.Directive of 22 June 1998. OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.
8.'2( Smernica z 22. jÿna 1998. à. v. ES L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37.
› The system also permits national draft legislation to be put on ice for a certain period to facilitate discussion at Com-munity level on the matter in the light of harmonisation initiatives.
› Systïm tie™ umo™ﾏuje pozastavenie nèvrhu nèrodnej legisla-tóvy na urｲit̅ ｲas, kvúli uﾋahｲeniu diskusie na ÿrovni Spolo-ｲenstva o zèle™itosti z hﾋadiska harmonizaｲn̅ch iniciatóv.
Moreover, by means of this legislative observa-tory, the real needs for harmonisation can be identi«edmore easily.
Na-viac, sledovanie legislatóvy uﾋahｲuje urｲenie skutoｲn̅ch potrieb v oblasti harmonizècie.
An entire philosophy of information exchange, dialogue and cooperation has evolved between the Member States. This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Tento mechanizmus sa javó aj ako ÿ™asn̅ nèstroj porovnèvania, ktor̅ umo™ﾏuje ｲlensk̅m þtètom vyu™óvaﾝ myþlienky svojich partnerov pri rie-þenó spoloｲn̅ch problïmov t̅kajÿcich sa technick̅ch predpi-sov, najmê v novoregulovan̅ch sektoroch, ako sÿ geneticky modi«kovanïorganizmy,nèzvydomïnagïnovèterapia.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Okrem toho Komisia pou™óva smernicu 98/34/ES ako vzde-lèvacó nèstroj, ktor̅ mè pomúcﾝ prispúsobiﾝ þt̅l legislatóvy ｲlensk̅ch þtètov.
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
Systïm, ktorïho spustenie prebiehalo pomaly, sa rozvójal a po-skytol Komisii, ｲlensk̅m þtètom a podnikom prehﾋad o aktivi-tèch nèrodn̅ch ÿradov a normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov v technickej oblasti (pravidlè t̅kajÿce sa zlo™enia, oznaｲenia, nèzvu, skÿþa-nia v̅robku atｵ., ako aj pravidlè t̅kajÿce sa ™ivotnosti v̅robku a™ po jeho likvidèciu).
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net. In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
Rozsah smernice bol progresóvne rozþóre-n̅, tak™e v sÿｲasnosti pokr̅va vþetky poﾋnohospodèrske a prie-myselne vyrèbanï v̅robky a zohﾋadﾏuje stèle rastÿci poｲet ustanovenó, najmê kvúli predchèdzaniu ak̅mkoﾋvek opatre-niam, ktorï si nepriamo vy™adujÿ zabezpeｲenie sÿladu s tech-nick̅mi þpeci«kèciamizóskan̅mizinternetu.Vroku1998bolpostup rozþóren̅ smernicou 98/48/ES tak, aby zahﾕﾏal pravidlè o slu™bèch informaｲnej spoloｲnosti (3).
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection.
Prostrednóctvom tohto nèstroja je Komisia ÿspeþnè nielen pri odstraﾏovanó ustanovenó, ktorï sÿ v rozpore s legislatóvou Spo-loｲenstva, ale prispieva aj k formulècii ustanovenó, ktorï budÿ zapósanï do nèrodnej legislatóvy na zabezpeｲenie toho, ™e pod-nikateﾋskï subjekty zóskajÿ ÿplnï informècie o svojich prèvach a povolia praktickï uplatnenie princópu ¶vzèjomnïho uznèva-nia• uvedenïho v interpretècii ｲlènku 28 a nèsl.
The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
Zmluvy Eurùp-skeho Sÿdneho dvora.
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended.
Doþlo aj k postupnïmu rozþóreniu geogra«ckejpúsobnostismer-nice.
Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Smernica 98/34/ES, ktorè u™ bola ｲiastoｲne implementovanè od roku 1990 (4) v krajinèch EFTA, bola ｲiastoｲne implementovanè aj v Turecku na zèklade Asociaｲnej zmluvy s danou krajinou (5).
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
Medzi ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi sa rozvinula celkovè «lozo«a
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p.
'3( Smernica 83/189/EHS bola doplnenè hlavne Smernicou Rady 88/182/EHS z 22. marca 1988 (à. v. ES L 81, 26.3.1988, s.
Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 c o d i « e d D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C a n d a l l i t s s u bse q u e n t a mffe n d - mffe n t s while Directive 98/48/EC of 20 July 1998 amended Directive 98/34/EC.
Smernica 98/34/ES z 22. jÿna 1998 k o d i « k o v a l a S m e r n i c u 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E H S a v þ e t k y n è s l e d n ï doplnky, zatiaﾋ ｲo Smernica 98/48/ES z 20. jÿla 1998 doplnila Smernicu 98/34/ES.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
'4( Dohoda medzi ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi EFTA a EHS ustanovujÿca postup pri poskytovanó informèció v oblasti technick̅ch predpisov vstÿpila do platnosti v novembri roku 1990.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Dohoda o Eurùpskom hospodèrskom priestore, platnè od 1. januèra 1994, nèsledne zapracovala Smernicu 83/189/EHS s nevyhnutn̅mi ÿpravami.
Switzerland, though not a signatory to this Agreement, continues to apply the procedure for the exchange of in-formation.
Þvajｲiarsko, hoci nie je signatèrom tejto Dohody, naｵalej uplatﾏuje postup t̅kajÿci sa v̅meny informèció.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol.
'5( Dohoda ustanovujÿca Asocièciu medzi Eurùpskym hospodèrskym spoloｲenstvom a Tureckom (à. v. ES C Odd. 16 ｲ.
Convention No 180 of the Council of Europe on Information and Legal Co-operation concerning `Information Society Services'.
( Dohovor ｲ. 180 Rady Eurùpy o Informècièch a spoluprèci v oblasti prèva t̅kajÿcej sa ¶slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnostiƒ.
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
Aby bolo nèrodnï obmedzenie prijateﾋnï ako v̅nimka zo zè-kladn̅ch slobúd vnÿtornïho trhu v neharmonizovanej oblasti, musó byﾝ na zèklade tohto precedentnïho prèva v sÿlade s princópmi nediskriminècie, nevyhnutnosti a ÿmernosti (00).
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
re pre v̅robky z krajón EFTA k Dohode (7) › je vzèjomnï uznè-vanie predpisov t̅kajÿcich sa navrhovania, v̅roby a skÿþania v̅robkov a pou™it̅ch postupov posudzovania zhody; ｲlen-skï þtèty a Komisia sÿ informovanï o t̅chto predpisoch prostrednóctvom postupu o poskytovanó informèció ustano-venïho smernicou 98/34/ES.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Okrem toho, ustanovenia Rozhodnutia 1/95 Asociaｲnej Rady EK › Turecko z 22. decembra 1995 o implementècii zèvereｲ-nej fèzy Colnej ÿnie (8), ktorï zabezpeｲuje eliminèciu kvanti-
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Pokiaﾋ ide najmê o slobodu poskytovaﾝ slu™by, znamenè to, ™e nèrodnï predpisy, ktorï neposkytujÿ ™iadne uznanie po™iada-viek, ktorï operètor u™ splnil vo svojom ｲlenskom þtète usade-nia sa, z ktorïho poskytuje svoje slu™by (01), sa budÿ javiﾝ ako neprimeranï obmedzenie, a teda neprijateﾋnï podﾋa zèkona Spoloｲenstva, keｵ je predmetnè slu™ba poskytovanè, ako v pró-pade slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnosti, bez toho, aby poskyto-vateﾋ musel vstÿpiﾝ na ÿzemie ｲlenskïho þtètu, v ktorom je slu™-ba prijómanè (02).
Furthermore, the provisions of Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the « n a l p h a s e o ft h e C uffs t o m s U n i o n , which provides for the elimination of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent e . e c t b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d Tffu r k e y , a r e i n t e r p r e t e d f o r the purposes of their implementation and application to products covered by the Customs Union, in conformity with the relevant decisions of the European Court of Justice con-cerning provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 28 to 30 thereof.
tatóvnych obmedzenó alebo opatrenó s podobn̅m ÿｲinkom medzi Eà a Tureckom, sÿ vysvetﾋovanï na ÿｲely ich imple-mentècie a uplatnenia na v̅robky zahrnutï v Colnej ÿnii v sÿlade s prósluþn̅mi rozhodnutiami Eurùpskeho Sÿdneho dvora t̅kajÿcimi sa Zmluvy o ES, najmê ｲlènkov 28 a™ 30 tej-to Zmluvy.
Directive 98/34/EC, by extending the scope of application of the information procedure to rules on Information Society services, ensured, since August 1999, the prevention of new barriers to the freedom of establishment and the free move-ment of Information Society services by providing a mecha-nism to analyse the compatibility of new national legislation in this « e l d w i t h A r t i c l e s 4 3 a n d 4 9 o ft h e E C T r e a t y .
Smernica 98/34/ES rozþórenóm rozsahu uplatnenia informaｲnï-ho postupu na pravidlè t̅kajÿce sa slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲ-nosti zabezpeｲila od augusta v roku 1999 prevenciu nov̅ch prekè™ok brèniacich slobode zakladaﾝ podniky a voﾋnïmu po-hybu slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnosti poskytnutóm mechaniz-mu na anal̅zu kompatibility novej legislatóvy v tejto oblasti s ｲlènkami 43 a 49 Zmluvy o ES.
According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, Ar-ticles 43 and 49 of the Treaty require the elimination of restric-
Komisia sa tie™ ubez-peｲila, ™e plènovanï nèrodnï predpisy neznamenajÿ zbytoｲnï alebo nadmernï prèvne alebo administratóvne nèklady pre operètorov a mo™no aj pou™óvateﾋov.
It must be pointed out that the relevant provisions of the Agreement on the European Economic Area apply only to `products originating in the Contracting Parties' and not, consequently, to products simply marketed there.
'7( Je potrebnï poznamenaﾝ, ™e prósluþnï ustanovenia Zmluvy o Eurùpskom hospodèrskom priestore sa vzﾝahujÿ iba na ¶v̅robky pochèdzajÿce od Zmluvn̅ch strèn• a nèsledne na v̅robky tam obchodovateﾋnï na trhu.
1.Case C-439/99 Commission v Italy - `Trade Fairs' [2002] ECR I-305.Case C-76/90 `Dennemeyer' [1991] ECR I-4221; Case C-369/96 `Arblade' [1999] ECR I-8453 and Case C-55/94 `Gebhard' [1995] ECR I-4165.See `Arblade' judgment cited above, footnote 11.See `Dennemeyer' judgment cited above, footnote 11.
'00) Própad C-76/90 ¶Dennemeyer• [1991] ECR I-4221; Própad C-369/96 ¶Arblade• [1999] ECR I-8453 a própad C-55/94 ¶Gebhard• [1995] ECR I-4165.'01) Pozri ¶Arblade• rozhodnutie uvedenï vyþþie, poznèmka pod ｲiarou 11.
sults in the technical regulations concerned being inapplicable, so that they are unenforceable against individuals.
veniam, a tak poznaﾝ presne svoje prèva a povinnosti.
In order to enable the Directive to be fully e.ective,alltheplay-ers - national authorities, standardisation bodies and the eco-nomic operators of the European Union - need to have a thor-ough understanding of its provisions and so be precisely aware of their rights and obligations.
Cieﾋom tejto próruｲky je informovaﾝ vþetk̅ch zainteresova-n̅ch ÿｲastnókov › a najmê eurùpskych v̅robcov a poskyto-
Chapter I: The scope of the Directive tional regulations and standards involving barriers to in-tra-Community trade had not been monitored by the Commission and the Member States because certain products were not covered.
Kapitola I: Rozsah smernice misia ani ｲlenskï þtèty nemonitorovali, preto™e urｲitï v̅robky neboli zahrnutï.
Article 1 d e « n e s t h e mffe a n i n g g i v e n b y t h e D i r e c t i v e t o a n u mb e r of key terms, used throughout its provisions.
Plènok 1 de«nujev̅znamdan̅smernicoupreniekoﾋkokﾋÿｲo-v̅ch termónov, ktorï sa pou™óvajÿ v jej ustanoveniach.
This ter-minological and semantic clari«cationisessentialtoane.ec-tive understanding of the text and simultaneously de«nesthescope of the Directive.
Toto ob-jasnenie terminolùgie a v̅znamu je zèkladom pre ÿｲinnï po-rozumenie textu a sÿｲasne de«nujerozsahsmernice.
The scope of the Directive
Rozsah smernice
In order to clarify the very broad de«nitionwhichisnowused,itisworth recalling that the Court of Justice included in the frame-work of the provisions relating to the free movement of goods under Article 28 of the Treaty, `products which can be valued in monetary terms and which may, as such, form the subject of com-mercial transactions'.In this context, the Court also ruled that waste, whether recyclable or not, is to be considered to be a prod-uct whose movement should not, in principle, be prevented.
Kvúli objasneniu v sÿｲasnosti pou™óvanej veﾋmi þirokej de«nóciestojó za to pripomenÿﾝ si, ™e Sÿdny dvor zahrnul do rèmca usta-novenó t̅kajÿcich sa voﾋnïho pohybu tovaru na zèklade ｲlènku 28 Zmluvy, ¶v̅robky, ktorï je mo™nï oceniﾝ v peﾏa™n̅ch pod-mienkach, a ktorï mú™u ako takï byﾝ predmetom komerｲn̅ch transakcióƒ (07).V tomto kontexte Sÿd tie™ nariadil, ™e odpad, ｲi u™ recyklovateﾋn̅ alebo nie, je pova™ovan̅ za v̅robok, ktorïho pohybu by nemalo byﾝ v zèsade, brènenï (08).
It is appropriate to take this into consideration in determining the scope of the Directive.
Toto je vhodnï zvè™iﾝ pri urｲovanó rozsahu smernice.
For the purposes of this Directive, the following meanings shall apply:
Pre ÿｲely tejto smernice platia nasledujÿce pojmy:
1) `product', any industrially manufactured product and any agri-cultural product, including «shproducts;
1. ¶v̅robokƒ, ak̅koﾋvek priemyselne vyroben̅ v̅robok a ak̅koﾋ-vek poﾋnohospodèrsky v̅robok, vrètane v̅robkov z r̅b;
2) `service', any Information Society service, that is to say, any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by elec-tronic means and at the individual request of a recipient of services.
2. ¶slu™baƒ, akèkoﾋvek slu™ba informaｲnej spoloｲnosti, menovite, ka™dè slu™ba be™ne poskytovanè za ÿplatu, na diaﾋku, elektronic-k̅mi prostriedkami a na zèklade individuèlnej ™iadosti prijómate-ﾋa slu™ieb (1/).
For the purposes of this de«nition:
Za ÿｲelom tejto de«nócie:
The scope of the initial version of the Directive (i.e. 83/189/EEC) excluded cosmetic products within the terms of Directive 76/768/EEC, medicinal products within the terms of Directive 65/65/EEC, products destined for human and animal consump-tion and agricultural products.
Rozsah poｲiatoｲnej verzie smernice (t. j. 83/189/EHS) vyｲlenil kozmetickï v̅robky v rèmci podmienok smernice 76/768/EHS (04), medicónske v̅robky v rèmci podmienok smernice 65/
› `at a distance' means that the service is provided without the parties being simultaneously present,
› ¶na diaﾋkuƒ znamenè, ™e slu™ba je poskytovanè bez sÿｲasnej prótomnosti dan̅ch strèn,
The scope of the Directive has been extended, since the opera-tion of the information procedure revealed that numerous na-
65/EHS (05), v̅robky urｲenï pre ﾋudskÿ a ™ivoｲóþnu spotrebu a poﾋnohospodèrske v̅robky (06).
› `by electronic means' means that the service is sent initially and received at its destination by means of electronic equipment for
Rozsah smernice bol rozþóren̅, keｵ™e pou™óvanie informaｲnï-ho postupu ukèzalo, ™e mnohï nèrodnï predpisy a normy, za-hﾕﾏajÿce prekè™ky brèniace obchodu vnÿtri Spoloｲenstva, Ko-
169.Repealed by Directive 2001/83/EC of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p.
'05) Zruþenè Smernicou 2001/83/ES zo 6. novembra 2001 o poriadku Spoloｲenstva t̅kajÿceho sa medicónskych v̅robkov pre ﾋudskÿ spotrebu. à. v. ES L 311, 28.11.2001, s. 67.
67.Within the meaning of former Article 38(1) of the Treaty (today Article 33(1) of the Treaty).Case 7/68 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic [1968] ECR 617.Case 2/90 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium [1992] ECR I-4431.
) Própad 2/90 Komisia Eurùpskych spoloｲenstiev v Belgickom krèﾋovstve [1992] ECR I-4431.
The notion of Information Society services was introduced by Directive 98/48/EC and then used in Directive 98/84/EC on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (OJ L 320, 28.11.1998, p.
'1/) Pojem slu™by informaｲnej spoloｲnosti zaviedla Smernica 98/48/ES a potom sa pou™óval v Smernici 98/84/ES o prèvnej ochrane slu™ieb zalo™enej alebo pozo-stèvajÿcej z podmienenïho próstupu (à. v. ES L 320, 28.11.1998, s.
54) and Directive 2000/31/EC on certain legal aspects of information society services, in par-ticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1).
54) a v Smernici 2000/31/ES o urｲit̅ch prèvnych aspektoch slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnos- ti, najmê v oblasti elektronickïho obchodu, na vnÿtornom trhu (à. v. ES L 178, 17.7.2000, s. 1).