natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The reason for this is simple: it is only `purely' national stand-ards that are likely to act as barriers to the proper functioning of the internal market.
Informècie oznamujÿ nèrodnï normalizaｲnï orgèny denne centrèlnym sekretariètom dvoch eurùpskych ÿradov, kde sÿ skontrolovanï, spracovanï a ulo™enï do databèzy.
An international or European standard should not, in principle, jeopardise the free movement of goods within the European Community, since its technical speci«ca-tions have been the subject of consensus on a much larger scale than the limits of national boundaries.
V̅sledky sa potom zaznamenèvajÿ podﾋa sektorov v periodickom registri (mesaｲne pre CEN a þtvrﾝroｲne pre CENELEC), ktor̅ je distribu-ovan̅ ｲlenom CEN a CENELEC, okrem prósluþn̅ch oddelenó Ko-misie (Generèlne riaditeﾋstvo pre podnikanie a priemysel) kvúli preskÿmaniu a pripomienkovaniu.
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall indicate, in par-ticular, whether the standard concerned:
Informècie uvedenï v odseku 1 uvèdzajÿ najmê, ｲi prósluþnè norma:
The publication of this register and its distribution on a nation-al level, is a guarantee of the transparency of the information communicated under the 98/34/EC procedure.
Zverejnenie tohto registra a jeho distribÿcia na nèrodnej ÿrov-ni je zèrukou transparentnosti informèció poskytovan̅ch podﾋa postupu 98/34/ES.
› will transpose an international standard without being the equivalent,
› transponuje medzinèrodnÿ normu bez toho, aby bola ekviva-lentnè,
› will be a new national standard, or
› bude novou nèrodnou normou, alebo
It is essential that industry and all interested parties know of this instrument and have access to the information in order to be able to exercise the following options open to them:
Je podstatnï, aby sa priemysel a vþetky zainteresovanï strany dozvedeli o tomto nèstroji a mali próstup k informècièm kvúli prieskumu nasledujÿcich mo™nostó, ktorï sÿ im dostupnï:
› to apply to take part in the work of the relevant technical committee of a standardisation body in another Member State (for example, a French company could apply to partici-pate in the German committee).
› po™iadaﾝ o zÿｲastnenie sa na prèci prósluþnïho technickej komisie normalizaｲnïho ÿradu v inom ｲlenskom þtète (na-próklad francÿzska spoloｲnosﾝ by mohla po™iadaﾝ o ÿｲasﾝ v nemeckom v̅bore),
The obligation on the national standardisation bodies to pro-vide details of the nature of the new draft standard has the ob-jective of ensuring transparency and facilitating the examina-tion of noti«cations.Itarisesdirectlyfromtheprecedingparagraph.
Povinnosﾝ nèrodn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov poskytovaﾝ podrobnosti o charaktere nèvrhu novej normy mè za cieﾋ za-bezpeｲiﾝ transparentnosﾝ a uﾋahｲenie preskÿmania oznèmenó. Vypl̅va to priamo z predchèdzajÿceho odseku.
The three categories of standards listed are in fact those which do not correspond to the `identical or equivalent transposition of an international standard' and must conse-quently be n o t i « e d u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C .
Tri kategùrie noriem uvedenï v zozname sÿ v podstate tie, ktorï sa nezho-dujÿ s ¶identickou alebo ekvivalentnou transpozóciou medzinè-rodnej normyƒ a musia byﾝ nèsledne oznèmenï podﾋa smernice 98/34/ES.
› to suggest that the standard be prepared on a European rather than a national level.
› navrhovaﾝ, aby bola norma pripravenè skúr na eurùpskej ako na nèrodnej ÿrovni.
This assumes that the national bodies are consulting industry by distributing the register as widely as possible, particularly through relays allowing easy access to the information.
› Nèvrh novej nèrodnej normy by mohol obsahovaﾝ technickï þpeci«kècie,ktorïmú™utvoriﾝprekè™kuvoﾋnïmupohybuto-varu v própade obmedzenïho pou™óvania normy.
› A new draft national standard could contain technical speci-«cationswhichmayconstituteabarriertothefreemove-ment of goods if the standard is used restrictively. This can only be ascertained by examining these speci«cationsindi-vidually.
Z toho vypl̅va, ™e nèrodnï orgèny konzultujÿ s odvetviami priemyslu prostrednóctvom ｲo najþirþej distribÿcie registra, naj-mê cez prenosovï prostriedky umo™ﾏujÿce ﾋahk̅ próstup k in-formècièm.
It is important to emphasise that interested parties, particularly industry, in practice have only a relatively short period of time in which to react.
Je dúle™itï zdúrazniﾝ, ™e zainteresovanï strany, najmê priemy-sel, majÿ v praxi iba relatóvne krètky ｲas na reakciu.
In the case of subsequent litigation, the fact that an objection was not raised will inevitably be used against those who have not examined the register.
V própade nèslednïho sÿdneho sporu bude skutoｲnosﾝ, ™e nebola vzne-senè nèmietka, nevyhnutne pou™itè proti t̅m, ktoró register nepreskÿmali.
As far as new standardisation subjects in the «eldoftelecom-munications is concerned, ETSI has been involved in the infor-mation procedure since it was included in Annex I to Directive 98/34/EC.
› Nèrodnÿ normu je mo™nï zmeniﾝ z dúvodu jej prispúsobe-nia po™iadavkèm technickïho pokroku.
In practice, this participation is limited to the receipt
Oznèmenie nèvrhu potom umo™ﾏuje preskÿmanie toho, ｲi by mohla zmena (do-plnenie, modi«kèciaaleboodstrènenieurｲit̅chtechnick̅chþpeci«kèció)spúsobiﾝnovïrizikètechnick̅chprekè™okob-chodu v rèmci Spoloｲenstva.
› A national standard transposing an international standard (ISO or IEC) may not be equivalent to the original document, since this transposition is not, as such, compulsory and since the national standardisation bodies can decide, on their own account, to make amendments if they consider that the technical speci«cationsarenotrelevanttotheirownmarket.In this case, it is advisable to evaluate the technical speci«ca-tion of the transposed standard with regard to the part which di.ersfromtheinternationalstandard.
Pokiaﾋ ide o novï predmety normalizècie v oblasti telekomuni-kèció, ETSI bol zapojen̅ do informaｲnej procedÿry odkedy bol zaｲlenen̅ v Prólohe I k smernici 98/34/ES. V praxi je tèto ÿｲasﾝ obmedzenè na prijatie a hodnotenie ÿdajov poskytovan̅ch ｲlenmi CEN a CENELEC a rozposielan̅ch centrèlnymi sekretari-ètmi t̅chto dvoch ÿradov kvúli skutoｲnosti, ™e nèrodnè nor-malizaｲnè ｲinnosﾝ v oblasti telekomunikèció je mimoriadne ob-medzenè.
This paragraph supplements paragraph (1). It stipulates that the Commission must not only be informed of new national initiatives but that it must also have access to all the standards programmes drawn up by the national and European stand-ardisation bodies.
periodicitou (prostrednóctvom centrèlnych sekretariètov CEN a CENELEC), ale musia oznèmiﾝ celï programy alebo ｲasti t̅ch-to programov na ™iadosﾝ Komisie.
› A national standard can be amended in order to adapt it to the requirements of technical progress.
Okrem toho, v priebehu tohto prieskumu nèrodnï normalizaｲ-nï orgèny, eurùpske normalizaｲnï orgèny a Komisia mú™u, ak zvè™ia, ™e uva™ovanè zmena by bola prospeþnè ako ustanove-nie novïho predmetu v̅skumu na eurùpskej ÿrovni, navrhnÿﾝ própravu eurùpskej normy.
The noti«cationofthe draft then makes it possible to examine whether the amendment (addition, modi«cationorremovalofcertaintechnical speci«cations)couldintroducenewrisksoftechni-cal barriers to trade within the Community.
Komisia konè pri posielanó t̅chto informèció ｲlensk̅m þtètom ako ¶clearing-houseƒ.
In addition, in the course of this examination, the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies and the Commission can, if they consider that the envisaged amend-ment would merit setting up a new subject for research on a Eu-ropean level, suggest the preparation of a European standard.
V oblasti normalizècie mè smernica 98/34/ES za cieﾋ zabezpeｲiﾝ transparentnosﾝ nèrodn̅ch iniciatóv, ale zohrèva ÿlohu aj v podpore rozvoja eurùpskej normalizècie.
The Commission acts as a clearing house for forwarding this information to the Member States.
Tento odsek ustanovuje, ™e Komisia mè prèvomoc aktualizovaﾝ zoznam nèrodn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov, ktorï sÿ uvedenï v Prólohe II k smernici.
In the « e l d o fst a n d a r d i s a t i o n , t h e a i m o f D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C i s t o ensure the transparency of national initiatives, but it also has a role to play in encouraging the development of European standardisation.
Po konzultècii s V̅borom uveden̅m v ｲlènku 5, mú™e Komisia sta-noviﾝ pravidlè konsolidovanej prezentècie t̅chto informèció ako aj plènu a kritïrió riadiacich prezentèciu t̅chto informèció kvúli uﾋahｲeniu ich hodnotenia.
Where appropriate, the Commission shall amend Annex II on the basis of communications from the Member States.
Rada rozhodne o akomkoﾋvek doplnku k Prólohe I na zèklade nèvrhu Komisie.
After consulting the Committee referred to in Article 5, the Com-mission may draw up rules for the consolidated presentation of this information and a plan and criteria governing the presenta-tion of this information in order to facilitate its evaluation.
Hoci bola ｲinnosﾝ postupu pri poskytovanó informèció v oblasti noriem prenesenè prostrednóctvom zmluvy na CEN a CENELEC, Komisia sama vykonèva dozor nad jeho nèle™it̅m fungovanóm, najmê zachovanóm mo™nosti navrhnÿﾝ, ™e dva eurùpske nor-malizaｲnï orgèny prijmÿ metodolùgiu prezentècie zhroma™-den̅ch informèció, aby zabezpeｲili jednoduchþie spracovanie.
This paragraph stipulates that the Commission has the author-ity to update the list of national standardisation bodies which appears in Annex II to the Directive. This updating is carried out by the Member States, which must provide the Commission with the necessary information.
Tento odsek ustanovuje, ™e na rozdiel od Prólohy II, aktualizècia Prólohy I, ktorè obsahuje zoznam o«cièlneuznan̅cheurùp-skych normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov, nespadè pod v̅luｲnÿ jurisdik-ciu Komisie, ale vy™aduje rozhodnutie Rady ministrov na zèkla-de nèvrhu Komisie.
The Council shall decide, on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, on any amendment to Annex I.
Komisia mú™e po™iadaﾝ o celï programy alebo ｲasﾝ normalizaｲ-n̅ch programov, ktorï jej boli oznèmenï.
Although the operation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardshasbeendelegatedbycontract to CEN and CENELEC, the Commission itself supervises its proper functioning, in particular by retaining the option of suggesting that the two European standardisation bodies adopt a methodology for the presentation of the collected in-formation, in order to ensure easier processing.
Próloha I k smernici bola napróklad doplnenè v roku 1992, kvúli pri-daniu ETSI do zoznamu eurùpskych normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov (42).
This paragraph stipulates that, unlike Annex II, the updating of Annex I, containing the list of o / c i a l l y r e c o g n i s e d E u r op e a n s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n bodies, does not come under the exclusive juris-diction of the Commission but requires a decision by the Council of Ministers on the basis of a proposal from the Commission.
Spróstupnó tieto informècie ｲlensk̅m þtètom vo forme, ktorè do-voﾋuje hodnotenie a porovnanie rúznych programov.
It shall make this information available to the Member States in a form which allows the di.erentprogrammestobeassessedandcompared.
Tento odsek dopﾊﾏa odsek (1). Stanovuje, ™e Komisia nielen™e musó byﾝ informovanè o nov̅ch nèrodn̅ch iniciatóvach, ale musó maﾝ aj próstup ku vþetk̅m normalizaｲn̅m programom stanove-n̅m nèrodn̅mi alebo eurùpskymi normalizaｲn̅mi orgènmi.
Annex I to the Directive was, for example, amended in 1992 in order to add ETSI to the list of European standardisation bodies.
Vþetky nèvrhy noriem sÿ zaslanï normalizaｲn̅m orgènom uve-den̅m v Prólohèch I a II a Komisii na po™iadanie; dostèvajÿ infor-mècie od orgènu, ktor̅ sa zaujóma o ｲinnosﾝ v dúsledku ak̅chkoﾋ-vek pripomienok, ktorï boli vo vzﾝahu k nèvrhom vznesenï.
Communication of draft standards to the European and na-tional standardisation bodies and the Commission
n̅m orgènom inïho ｲlenskïho þtètu, eurùpskym normalizaｲ-n̅m orgènom alebo Komisiou a bude ich informovaﾝ o prija-t̅ch opatreniach t̅kajÿcich sa ak̅chkoﾋvek pripomienok predlo™en̅ch k nèvrhu normy.
› communicate information in accordance with Articles 2 and 3,
Vy™aduje sa tie™ informovanie vþetk̅ch t̅ch, ktoró pripomien-kovali jeden z t̅chto nèvrhov, o prijatom opatrenó: ｲi u™ o dopl-nenó nèvrhu, stiahnutó nèvrhu alebo o oprèvnenó zadr™aﾝ ho.
The standardisation bodies referred to in Annexes I and II, and the Commission, shall be sent all draft standards on request; they shall be kept informed by the body concerned of the action taken on any comments they have made relating to drafts.
Opatrenia v kompetencii ｲlensk̅ch þtètov
This subparagraph stipulates that each Member State must ensure, by whatever means it considers necessary, that its standardisation body does in fact notify all new subjects for standards at the time they are entered in the annual work pro-gramme, supplies any draft standard which is requested by the standardisation body of another Member State, a Europe-an standardisation body or the Commission, and keeps them informed of the action taken on any comments made on the draft standard.
Podﾋa tohto pododseku musó ka™d̅ ｲlensk̅ þtèt zabezpeｲiﾝ, aby jeho normalizaｲn̅ orgèn poskytol stranèm v ànii próle™i-tosﾝ pripomienkovaﾝ nèvrhy nèrodn̅ch noriem.
Directive 98/34/EC stipulates that once they are informed of the preparation of new standards initiatives in the various Member States, the national standardisation bodies, European standardisation bodies and the Commission shall have the right to require the standardisation body of a Member State to send the text of any draft standard which it has noti«ed.Thelatter must comply with this request.
T̅ka sa to aj in̅ch ｲlensk̅ch þtètov, v ktor̅ch je verejn̅ prieskum na nèrod-nej ÿrovni zèkladnou fèzou na konci procesu nèvrhu normy pred kontrolou platnosti a zverejnenóm de«nitóvnehotextu.Tèto formèlna konzultècia vþetk̅ch spoloｲensk̅ch a podnika-teﾋsk̅ch subjektov umo™ﾏuje nèrodn̅m normalizaｲn̅m orgè-nom zóskaﾝ istotu, ™e o texte existuje ÿpln̅ konsenzus.
› publish the draft standards in such a way that comments may also be obtained from parties established in other Member States,
Ide o povinnosﾝ z hﾋadiska v̅-sledku, nie prostriedkov, preto™e zatiaﾋ ｲo ｲlenskï þtèty, ktor̅ch sa to t̅ka, musia transponovaﾝ smernicu do nèrodnïho prèva, v̅ber metùdy transpozócie je ponechan̅ na ｲlenskï þtèty, po-kiaﾋ je dosiahnut̅ sledovan̅ cieﾋ.
It is also required to inform all those who have commented on one of these drafts of the action taken: whether amendment to the draft, the withdrawal of the draft or the justi«cationforre-taining it.
Okrem toho skutoｲnosﾝ, ™e vêｲþina nèrodn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov mè status sÿkromnej inþtitÿcie zni™uje rozsah mo™-nosti vydèvaﾝ prókazy zo strany nèrodn̅ch ÿradov.
Measures for which the Member States are competent
V podstate ka™d̅ nèrodn̅ orgèn posiela na po™iadanie kùpiu akejkoﾋvek normy vþetk̅m normalizaｲn̅m orgènom in̅ch ｲlen-sk̅ch þtètov.
Article 4 (like Article 7) sets out Member States' obligations with regard to the organisation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandards.Itisanobligationastotheresult, not the means, because whilst a Directive must be trans-posed into internal law by the Member States to which it is ad-dressed, the choice of transposition method is left to the Mem-ber States, as long as the objective pursued is attained.
Do dotaznóka, ktor̅ zvyｲajne pripojó k nèvrhu normy orgèn, ktor̅ ho pripravil, je potrebnï uviesﾝ pripomienky t̅kajÿce sa cieﾋov smernice 98/34/ES (napróklad: Myslóte si, ™e tak̅to nèvrh mú™e maﾝ za nèsledok prekè™ky obchodu?
Basically, each national body sends, on request, a copy of any draft standard to all the standardisation bodies of the other Member States.
Myslóte si, ™e by mal byﾝ pou™it̅ ako zèklad pre eurùpsku prècu?
This copy is obviously written in the working language of the issuing body.
Chceli by ste parti-cipovaﾝ v prèci na próprave normalizaｲnïho v̅boru? atｵ.).
The recipients are responsible for having it translated into their own language and organising a consultation on their own territory, in accordance with the pro-cedures in force in the country (the draft standard is, for exam-ple, sent by the national body to the standards engineer re-sponsible for the sector concerned, who in turn passes it on to
Tento pododsek ustanovuje, ™e ka™d̅ ｲlensk̅ þtèt musó zabez-peｲiﾝ ak̅mikoﾋvek prostriedkami, ktorï bude pova™ovaﾝ za vhodnï, ™e jeho normalizaｲn̅ orgèn oznèmi vþetky novï pred-mety noriem v ｲase ich zaｲlenenia do roｲnïho pracovnïho programu, dodè ka™d̅ nèvrh normy po™adovan̅ normalizaｲ-
Furthermore, the fact that most of the national standardisation bodies have the status of a private institution reduces the na-tional authorities' scope to give them orders. Hence the very ‹ e x i b l e w o r d i n g o ft h e D i r e c t i v e i n t h i s c o n t e x t .
Nèvrh je potom vrèten̅ vydèvajÿcemu orgènu spolu s pripo-mienkami od vþetk̅ch spoloｲensk̅ch a podnikateﾋsk̅ch sub-jektov rúznych ｲlensk̅ch þtètov Spoloｲenstva.
the relevant standardisation committee which is composed of all the interested parties).
› udelia ostatn̅m orgènom uveden̅m v Prólohe II prèvo na pa-sóvne alebo aktóvne zapojenie sa (vyslanóm pozorovateﾋa) do plènovan̅ch aktivót, vidlami stanoven̅mi eurùpskymi normalizaｲn̅mi orgènmi a ne-prijmÿ ™iadne opatrenia, ktorï mú™u v tomto ohﾋade ohroziﾝ rozhodnutie.
standard being prepared in another Member State, without at-tending the working meetings in the Member State con-cerned.
Smernica vy™aduje, aby vþetky ｲlenskï þtèty zabezpeｲili, aby ich prósluþnï orgèny udelili inïmu nèrodnïmu inþtitÿtu (AF-NOR, DIN, BSI, atｵ.) prèvo na zapojenie sa do prèce na próprave normy v prósluþnom technickom v̅bore.
The possibility of intervention is evaluated by the national standardisation body, which chooses one or other type of in-volvement.
Toto prèvo zapojenia mú™e byﾝ vykonèvanï pasóvne alebo aktóvne.
A questionnaire, usually attached to the draft standard by the body which prepared it, calls for comments regarding the ob-jectives of Directive 98/34/EC (for example, `Do you think that such a draft may result in barriers to trade?' `Do you think that it should be used as a basis for European work?' `Would you like to be involved in the work of preparation on the standardisa-tion committee? etc.).
Tento pododsek smernice obsahuje v̅zvu pre ｲlenskï þtèty, aby vyvinuli vþetko ÿsilie na zabezpeｲenie toho, aby sa ich prósluþnï normalizaｲnï orgèny nesna™ili brèniﾝ prèci na technickej harmonizècii, ktorÿ vykonèvajÿ eurùpske norma-lizaｲnï orgèny t̅m, ™e nebudÿ brèniﾝ próprave nèvrhu zmlu-vy púvodne pripravovanej na nèrodnej ÿrovni, nakoniec na eurùpskej ÿrovni.
The Directive cannot formally require national bodies to accept the comments of other national bodies, but acceptance should, in principle, be guaranteed since all standardisation procedures stipulate that a standardisation body should endeavour to take these comments into account.
Aktóvna ÿｲasﾝ predpokladè, ™e bude vyslan̅ pozorovateﾋ (v̅-robca, podnikateﾋsk̅ subjekt alebo normalizaｲn̅ odbornók). Ak nie je v̅robca alebo podnikateﾋsk̅ subjekt k dispozócii a rozhodne sa o vyslanó normalizaｲnïho odbornóka, tento musó poznaﾝ pozóciu danïho odvetvia priemyslu vo svojej kra-jine, aby zóskal dostatoｲnï poznatky o trhu a bol schopn̅ po-vedaﾝ, ｲi nèvrh normy je alebo nie je rizikom poþkodenia voﾋ-nïho pohybu tovaru na prósluþnom trhu.
The draft is then returned to the issuing body, with comments from all the economic and social operators of the various Mem-ber States of the Community.
Smernica ich nabèda › prostrednóctvom ｲlensk̅ch þtètov › aby preukèzali solidaritu, ktorè je pre spo-loｲn̅ cieﾋ jednotnïho trhu nevyhnutnè.
› grant the other bodies referred to in Annex II the right to be in-volved passively or actively (by sending an observer) in the planned activities,
Pasóvna ÿｲasﾝ je synonymom ÿｲasti na diaﾋku: napróklad, odbor-nók poskytne stanovisko k nèvrhu normy pripravovanej v inom ｲlenskom þtète bez zÿｲastﾏovania sa pracovn̅ch stretnutó v prósluþnom ｲlenskom þtète.
This right of involvement may be exercised passively or actively.
Mo™nosﾝ intervencie hodnotó nèrodn̅ normalizaｲn̅ orgèn, ktor̅ vyberè ist̅ typ ÿｲasti.
In this subparagraph, the Directive calls on the Member States to make every e.orttoensurethattheirrespectivestandardi-sation bodies do not attempt to impede the work of technical harmonisation being carried out by the European standardisa-tion bodies, by preventing a draft standard which they intend to prepare on a national level from ultimately being prepared at the European level.
Smernica nemú™e formèlne vy™adovaﾝ, aby nèrodnï orgèny prijali pripomienky in̅ch nèrodn̅ch orgènov, ale prijatie by malo byﾝ v zèsade zaruｲenï, keｵ™e vþetky normalizaｲnï po-stupy stanovujÿ, aby sa normalizaｲn̅ orgèn sna™il tieto pripo-mienky zohﾋadniﾝ.
Active involvement assumes that an observer will be sent (a manufacturer, an economic operator or a standards engineer).
› nebudÿ namietaﾝ, aby sa predmet zaraden̅ do ich plènu nor-malizaｲn̅ch prèc prerokoval na eurùpskej ÿrovni v sÿlade s pra-
Passive involvement is synonymous with involvement at a dis-tance: for example, an expert will give an opinion on a draft
Odsek (2) stanovuje, ™e ｲlenskï þtèty sa nemú™u vzdaﾝ svojich zodpovednostó skr̅vanóm sa za zodpovednosti prósluþn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov, keｵ tieto prijali normu s poruþenóm ustanovenia smernice 98/34/ES.
Directive 98/34/EC contains such a provision because the na-tional standardisation bodies are all members of CEN and CENELEC and could therefore use their votes, in accordance with purely national interests, to oppose a draft standard be-ing considered at a European level.
Ak neboli schopnó zabrèniﾝ pri-jatiu dokumentu so sÿkromn̅m púvodom a dobrovoﾋnej ™ia-dosti, ktorè odporuje zèkonu Spoloｲenstva, musia ｲlenskï þtèty zabrèniﾝ pou™óvaniu normy ako referenｲnïho dokumentu t̅m, ™e odmietnu jeho formèlne uznanie alebo prijatie. In̅mi slova-mi, ak nèrodnï orgèny konajÿ neprimerane, nèrodnï vlèdy by z takejto situècie nemali ﾝa™iﾝ.
A proposal to prepare a European standard, made by a national standardisation body to CEN or CENELEC, has to receive the support of a minimum of countries for the Central Secretariat of CEN or CENELEC to propose its acceptance to the Technical Board.
'43) Nèvrh na própravu eurùpskej normy adresovan̅ nèrodn̅m normalizaｲn̅m orgènom CEN alebo CENELEC musó zóskaﾝ podporu minimèlne od krajón Centrèl-neho sekretariètu CEN alebo CENELEC, aby navrhli jej prijatie Technickej komisii.
In other words, if the national bodies act unreasonably, the national governments should not exploit the situation.
Povinnosﾝ ｲlensk̅ch þtètov zabezpeｲiﾝ, ™e eurùpska technic-kè harmonizècia nebude poruþenè
Paragraph 1 shall not apply to the work of standards institu-tions undertaken at the request of the public authorities to draw up technical specifications or a standard for specific prod-ucts for the purpose of enacting a technical regulation for such products.
Odsek 1 sa nevzﾝahuje na prècu inþtitÿció pre normalizèciu, kto-rè je vykonèvanè na zèklade ™iadosti verejn̅ch ÿradov o navrh-nutie technick̅ch þpeci«kècióalebonormypreþpeci«ckïv̅robkyza ÿｲelom ustanovenia technickïho predpisu pre takïto v̅robky.
Member States shall communicate all requests of the kind referred to in the preceding subparagraph to the Commission as draft technical regulations, in accordance with Article 8 (1), and shall state the grounds for their enactment.
Plenskï þtèty oznèmia vþetky po™iadavky typu uvedenïho v pred-chèdzajÿcom pododseku Komisii ako nèvrh technick̅ch predpisov, v sÿlade s ｲlènkom 8 (1), a stanovia zèklad pre ich uzèkonenie.
This Article stipulates that the Member States must ensure that their respective standardisation bodies observe a standstill period when the work in progress at European level relates to the prepa-ration of a European standard requested by the Commission.
Tento ｲlènok þpeci«kuje,™eｲlenskïþtètymusiazabezpeｲiﾝ,abyich prósluþnï normalizaｲnï orgèny dodr™iavali obdobie preru-þenia prèc na technickom predpise, keｵ sa vykonèvanè prèca na eurùpskej ÿrovni t̅ka própravy eurùpskej normy po™adova-nej Komisiou.