natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EU countries may adopt the necessary measures to refuse, terminate or withdraw any right conferred by the Directive in the case of abuse of rights or fraud, such as marriages of convenience or forged documentation.
Krajiny EÚ môžu prijať potrebné opatrenia na odmietnutie, zrušenie alebo ukončenie akéhokoľvek práva priznaného smernicou v prípade zneužitia práv alebo podvodu, ako sú napríklad účelové manželstvá alebo sfalšované doklady.
You can find the precise legal wording on the matter covered in this section in Chapter VI (Articles 27 to 33) and Article 35 of the Directive.
Presné právne znenie záležitosti, na ktorú sa vzťahuje táto časť, nájdete v kapitole VI (články 27 až 33) a v článku 35 smernice.
Transitional arrangements on free movement of workers
Prechodné ustanovenia o voľnom pohybe pracovníkov
EU countries can temporarily restrict access to their labour markets of nationals from countries which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007: as the transitional arrangements allow them to delay the application of EU law on free movement of workers guaranteeing free access to employment, they can instead apply national rules.
Krajiny EÚ môžu dočasne obmedziť prístup na svoje trhy práce štátnym príslušníkom krajín, ktoré vstúpili do EÚ v rokoch 2004 a 2007. Keďže prechodné dojednania im umožňujú odložiť uplatňovanie práva EÚ o voľnom pohybe pracujúcich, ktorým sa zabezpečuje voľný prístup k zamestnaniu, môžu namiesto toho uplatňovať vnútroštátne predpisy.
As a consequence, workers from the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (until 30 April 2011 at the latest), Romania and Bulgaria (until 31 December 2013 at the latest) can be required to obtain a work permit in order to take up employment in one of the other EU countries.
V dôsledku toho sa od pracovníkov z Českej republiky, Estónska, Litvy, Lotyšska, Maďarska, Poľska, Slovenska a Slovinska (najneskôr do 30. apríla 2011), Rumunska a Bulharska (najneskôr do 31. decembra 2013) môže požadovať získanie pracovného povolenia, keď sa chcú zamestnať v niektorej z iných krajín EÚ.
As a further consequence, EU countries may also derogate from some specific provisions on the right of residence of EU workers but only where this is necessary.
Ďalším dôsledkom je, že krajiny EÚ sa môžu odchýliť od niektorých osobitných ustanovení o práve na pobyt pracovníkov EÚ, ale len keď je to nutné.
For example, an EU country that requires registration with the relevant authorities for periods of residence longer than three months could require workers from the above countries who need to obtain a work permit to produce this work permit, in addition to the confirmation of engagement from the employer or a certificate of employment.
Napríklad krajina EÚ, ktorá vyžaduje registráciu na príslušných orgánoch na obdobie pobytu dlhšie ako tri mesiace, môže vyžadovať od pracovníkov z uvedených krajín, ktorí potrebujú získať pracovné povolenie, aby predložili okrem potvrdenia zamestnávateľa o prijatí do zamestnania alebo potvrdenia o zamestnaní aj toto pracovné povolenie.
Where to find more information?
Kde nájdete viac informácií?
If you need to find more information on whether the EU country you would like to work in restricts access to its labour market or on the working and living conditions, please go to the official website http://ec.europa.eu/eures where you can find comprehensive information on free movement of workers.
Ak potrebujete viac informácií o tom, či krajina EÚ, v ktorej by ste chceli pracovať, obmedzuje prístup na svoj trh práce, alebo o iných pracovných a životných podmienkach, navštívte oficiálnu webovú stránku http://ec.europa.eu/eures, na ktorej nájdete úplné informácie o voľnom pohybe pracovníkov.
You can also consult the Commission’s Guide to working in another EU country produced by the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, which is available to download at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=25 & langId=en & pubId=215 & type=2 & furtherPubs=yes
Môžete sa obrátiť aj na Príručku Komisie o práci v inej krajine EÚ vypracovanú generálnym riaditeľstvom pre zamestnanosť, sociálne záležitosti a rovnaké príležitosti, ktorá je dostupná na adrese http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=25 & langId=sk & pubId=215 & type=2 & furtherPubs=yes
How to protect your rights
Ako chrániť svoje práva a p i t K
Where can you find more information?
Kde nájdete ďalšie informácie?
What can you do if you think your rights have not been upheld?
Čo môžete urobiť, ak si myslíte, že vaše práva neboli dodržané?
Where to get free information?
Kde získate bezplatné informácie?
For further information about your rights to free movement and residence, you can consult the European Commission’s online information portal, Your Europe: http://ec.europa.eu/youreurope
Ďalšie informácie o svojich právach na voľný pohyb a pobyt môžete nájsť on-line na informačnom portáli Európskej komisie Vaša Európa http://ec.europa.eu/youreurope
You may also wish to consult the website of the European Commission’s Directorate-General Justice at http://ec.europa.eu/about/ds_en.htm
Môžete tiež konzultovať informácie na webovej stránke Generálneho riaditeľstva pre spravodlivosť na adrese http://ec.europa.eu/about/ds_sk.htm
If you would like to access EU legislation on free movement, you can visit the European Commission’s online access portal to EU law, EUR-Lex at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm
Ak by ste chceli mať prístup k právnym predpisom EÚ o voľnom pohybe, môžete navštíviť portál Európskej komisie on-line prístupu k právu EÚ EUR-Lex na adrese http://eur-lex.europa.eu/sk/index.htm
Do you think that your rights have been violated?
Domnievate sa, že vaše práva boli porušené?
If you think that your right to move and reside freely has been violated, you should appeal before the competent national courts or administrative bodies.
Ak si myslíte, že vaše právo na voľný pohyb a pobyt bolo porušené, mali by ste požiadať príslušné vnútroštátne súdy alebo správne orgány o nápravu.
Please note that national courts are the only body that can award you damages or order a body to do or stop doing something.
Upozorňujeme, že vnútroštátne súdy sú jediným orgánom, ktorý môže priznať náhradu škody alebo nariadiť orgánu, aby konal alebo sa zdržal konania.
You should contact a local solicitor for assistance.
Mali by ste sa obrátiť so žiadosťou o pomoc na miestneho právneho poradcu.
Citizens Signpost Service is a Europe-wide service that provides custom-made legal advice on your rights within the European Union.
Navigačná služba pre občanov je celoeurópska služba, ktorá vám poskytuje cielené právne rady o vašich právach v rámci Európskej únie.
Responses are provided free of charge, within 8 calendar days, and in any of the official languages of the European Union.
Odpovede sa poskytujú bezplatne do 8 kalendárnych dní a v ktoromkoľvek z úradných jazykov Európskej únie.
For more information, please go to http://ec.europa.eu/citizensrights
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na adrese http://ec.europa.eu/citizensrights
If you think that your problem was caused because national public authorities incorrectly applied their own national and also EU law, you can use the SOLVIT system, an online problem solving network in which EU countries work together to solve problems without legal proceedings.
Ak si myslíte, že váš problém spôsobilo nesprávne uplatňovanie vnútroštátneho práva, ako aj práva Spoločenstva vnútroštátnymi orgánmi verejnej správy, môžete využiť systém SOLVIT, ktorý je on-line sieťou na riešenie problémov, v rámci ktorej krajiny EÚ spolupracujú na riešení problémov mimosúdnou cestou.
For more information, please go to http://ec.europa.eu/solvit
Podrobnejšie informácie nájdete na adrese http://ec.europa.eu/solvit
If you consider that your EU rights have not been upheld and have exhausted the above means of redress, you can also lodge your complaint with the European Commission at http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_en.htm
Ak sa domnievate, že vaše práva občana EÚ neboli dodržané a využili ste uvedené opravné prostriedky, môžete podať sťažnosť Európskej komisii na adrese http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_sk.htm
You are also entitled to lodge a petition with the European Parliament.
Máte tiež nárok podať petíciu Európskemu parlamentu.
To lodge a petition, please go to www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=49 & language=EN
Ak chcete podať petíciu, navštívte webovú stránku http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=49 & language=SK
This brochure is the result of a number of recent initiatives, including the « n a l e v a l u a t i o nffo f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe c a r r i e d out between May and October 2003.
Tèto informaｲnè próruｲka bola vytvorenè na zèklade rúznych sÿｲasn̅ch prèc vrètane vyhodnotenia programu Daph-ne, ktorï sa uskutoｲnilo v mèji a™ oktùbri 2003.
This brochure is also largely indebted to Dr June Kane for her extensive detailed knowledge gained during monitoring visits to many Daphne projects.
Za jej vypracovanie vｵaｲóme najmê Dr. June Kaneovej a jej rozsiahlym podrobn̅m poznatkom, ktorï sme zóskali poｲas jej monitorovacóch nèvþtev.
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.
Viac doplﾏujÿcich informèció o Eurùpskej ÿnii je k dispozócii na internete.
It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int).
Dostupnï sÿ cez server Eurùpa (http://europa.eu.int).
Ç European Communities, 2005 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Ç Eurùpske spoloｲenstvè, 2005 Rozmno™ovanie je povolenï len so sÿhlasom autora.
Aims and priorities
Ciele a priority
So what is violence anyway?
Po je vlastne nèsilie?
Raison d'ðtre and the April 1997 hearing
Zdúvodnenie a zasadanie v apróli 1997
On 11 April 1997, representatives of 30 non-governmental organisations (NGOs), Members of the European Parliament, European Commission sta.members,law-enforcementrepresent-atives and individuals with expertise in the area of child protection gathered in Brussels for a hearing on the subjects of tra/ckingandsexualexploitationofchildren.
Zèstupcovia 30 mimovlèdnych organizèció (MVO), poslanci Eurùpskeho parlamentu, pracov-nóci Eurùpskej komisie, predstavitelia orgènov ｲinn̅ch v trestnom konanó a jednotlivci so skÿ-senosﾝami v oblasti ochrany detó sa stretli 11. apróla 1997 v Bruseli na zasadnutó o nezèkonnom obchodovanó a pohlavnom zneu™óvanó detó.
The hearing was one element of a broad-ranging response from the Commission to the events of 1996 that had shaken Europe and galvanised public and political opinion.
Zasadnutie bolo jedn̅m z v̅sledkov rozsiahlej reakcie Komisie na udalosti z roku 1996, ktorï otriasli Eurùpou a ovplyvnili verejnÿ a politickÿ mienku.
The discovery of the bodies of a number of missing girls in premises in Belgium in late summer 1996 raised questions about what Europe could do to protect children from those who wished to abuse or exploit them for p r o « t .
Objavenie niekoﾋk̅ch tiel nezvestn̅ch dievｲat v istej budove v Belgicku na konci leta 1996 nastolilo otèzky, ｲo by mohla Eurùpa spra-viﾝ, aby chrènila deti pred t̅mi, ktoró ich chcÿ t̅raﾝ alebo zneu™óvaﾝ vo svoj prospech.
T h e « r s t W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a t i o nffo f C h i l d r e n , held in Stockholm in August that same year, provided more information on such issues and, in a Declaration and Agenda for Action, suggested some possible actions that could be taken.
Viac informèció o t̅chto otèzkach poskytol Prv̅ svetov̅ kongres proti pohlavnïmu zneu™óvaniu detó na komerｲnï ÿｲely, ktor̅ sa konal v Þtokholme v auguste toho istïho roku.
In an aide-memoire to the Commission following the World Congress (
Kongres vo svojom vyhlèsenó a v akｲnom plène navrhol niekoﾋko mo™n̅ch krokov.
Commissioner with special responsibility for coordinating the Commission's activities against tra/ckingandsexualexploitationofchildren,declaredthat:
Anita Gradinovè, komisèrka s osobitnou zodpovednosﾝou za koordinèciu ｲinnostó Komisie zameran̅ch proti nezèkonnïmu obchodovaniu s deﾝmi a proti pohlavnïmu zneu™óvaniu detó,
`subscribes entirely to the Declaration adopted in Stockholm, calling for ``concerted action at national, regional and international level'', which presupposes the mobilisation of all the part-ners involved (national public authorities, international agencies, NGOs and private associa-tions, civil society and the tourism industry) as well as the provision of the necessary funding.
¶Komisia schvèlila anal̅zu zo Þtokholmu, ktorè skÿma rúznorodï a v mnoh̅ch própadoch prepojenï faktory ekonomickïho, socièlneho, kultÿrneho a politickïho charakteru, ktorï sa podieﾋajÿ na vytvèranó podmienok vedÿcich k pohlavnïmu zneu™óvaniu detó.ƒ
) Contribution of the of sexual exploitation (2
Nasledovala reakcia pani Gradinovej:
Commissioner Gradin's presentation emphasised the vital role to be played in combating sexual violence against children by NGOs and public authorities, and the urgent need for centralisation of data, the encouragement of informal forums for exchange of experience at European level, movement towards consensus on legal and programmatic guidelines, and improved targeting and assessment of measures to be taken and « n a n c e d b y t h e E U i t s e l f .
¶Komisia naplno podporuje vyhlèsenie prijatï v Þtokholme a vyz̅va na ,zladenie krokov na nèrodnej, regionèlnej a medzinèrodnej ÿrovni`, ｲo predpokladè mobilizèciu vþetk̅ch zÿｲastnen̅ch partnerov (nèrodn̅ch þtètnych orgènov, medzinèrodn̅ch agentÿr, MVO a sÿkromn̅ch zdru™enó, obｲianskej spoloｲnosti a sektora cestovnïho ruchu), ako aj poskyt-nutie nevyhnutn̅ch « n a n ｲ n ̅ c h z d r o j o v . P r o s t r e d n ó c t v o m e u r ù p s k y c h i n þ t i t ÿ c i ó n e s i e E à z o d p o v e d n o s ﾝ v rèmci svojich hranóc za boj proti tomuto neduhu...ƒ
The April 1997 hearing was therefore called to seek the views of grassroots organisations on how European-level cooperation and exchange could function and where the focus of e.orts
5 rÿｲanó ｲlensk̅m þtètom; Zelenej knihy o nov̅ch audiovizuèlnych slu™bèch, ako je internet a sprèvy o þkodlivom a protizèkonnom obsahu internetu4
The participants were clear about what they felt was needed:
àｲastnóci sa jednoznaｲne zhodli na tom, ｲo pova™ujÿ za dúle™itï:
‡ keeping the issues of abuse and sexual exploitation of children high on the political agenda through organised lobbying and awareness-raising;
‡ presadzovanie problematiky t̅rania a pohlavnïho zneu™óvania detó do popredia politickï-ho programu prostrednóctvom organizovanïho lobovania a zvyþovania povedomia;
‡ improved coherent legislative frameworks at national level and legal reforms to move to-wards harmonisation at European level;
‡ kvalitnejþie koherentnï legislatóvne rèmce na nèrodnej ÿrovni a prèvne reformy smerujÿce k harmonizècii na eurùpskej ÿrovni;
‡ cooperation and coordination among NGOs and improved multidisciplinary cooperation, leading to enhanced information exchange and sharing of good practices;
‡ spoluprèca a koordinècia medzi MVO a lepþia multidisciplinèrna spoluprèca vedÿca k þirþej v̅mene informèció a vzèjomnïmu poskytovaniu najlepþóch praktók;
‡ mapping of problems and resources to avoid duplication and produce added value;
‡ zistenie problïmov a zdrojov, aby sa prediþlo duplicitnosti a vytvorila sa pridanè hodno-ta;
‡ the involvement of children in all prevention and rehabilitation programmes, acknowledg-ing that they are not passive victims but important resources with needs that they should de«nethemselves (6).
‡ zapojenie detó do vþetk̅ch programov prevencie a rehabilitècie, keｵ™e nie sÿ pasóvnymi obeﾝami, ale dúle™it̅m zdrojom inþpirèció s potrebami, ktorï by mali samy de«novaﾝ6
These concerns were integrated into the design of the Daphne initiative (7), announced just after the hearing and which was launched in May 1997.
Tieto okruhy sa integrovali do nèvrhu iniciatóvy Daphne7, ktorè bola oznèmenè hneｵ po zasa-danó a uvedenè v mèji 1997.
Logically attached to the Commission's services in charge of justice and home a.airsandfundamentalrights,thisone-yearfundingline of ECU 3 million would be used to support modest projects (up to ECU 100 000 in the «rstyear) that would bring together NGOs from at least two Member States to cooperate in re-search, data collection and analysis, good practice identi«cationandsharing,training,ex-change and networking, awareness-raising and information campaigns, direct action to sup-port victims of violence, and the production of tools for policy and practice, such as guidelines and protocols.
Logicky ju priｲlenili k slu™bèm Komisie zodpovedn̅m za spravod-livosﾝ a vnÿtornï zèle™itosti a zèkladnï prèva, priｲom pridelenï roｲnï «nancovanievobjeme3 miliùny ECU sa malo pou™iﾝ na podporu nenèroｲn̅ch projektov (do 100.000 ECU v prvom roku) spèjajÿcich MVO aspoﾏ z dvoch ｲlensk̅ch þtètov s cieﾋom spolupracovaﾝ na v̅skume, zhroma™ｵovaﾝ a analyzovaﾝ ÿdaje, identi«kovaﾝanavzèjomsiposkytovaﾝnajlepþiepraktiky,vzdelèvaﾝ, vymieﾏaﾝ si informècie a komunikovaﾝ, zvyþovaﾝ povedomie a organizovaﾝ infor-maｲnï kampane, upriamiﾝ ｲinnosti na podporu obetó nèsilia a pripravovaﾝ nèstroje na politiku a prax, ako sÿ usmernenia a protokoly.
The Daphne initiative was open to all Member States, and NGOs submitting projects were additionally encouraged to «ndpartnersamongresearchinstitutes,law-en-forcement bodies, public authorities, schools and training establishments, the media and other sectors whose cooperation might be vital in combating violence.
Iniciatóva Daphne bola próstupnè vþetk̅m ｲlensk̅m þtètom, priｲom MVO, ktorï predkladali projekty, boli navyþe podporovanï, aby si samy hﾋa-dali partnerov medzi v̅skumn̅mi ÿstavmi, orgènmi ｲinn̅mi v trestnom konanó, þtètnymi or-gènmi, þkolami a vzdelèvacómi zariadeniami, mïdiami a ostatn̅mi sektormi, ktor̅ch spolu-prèca by mohla byﾝ potrebnè v boji proti nèsiliu.
In early anticipation of the planned European Campaign against Violence against Women in 1999, and recognising the links between violence against women and violence against chil-dren and young people, the Daphne initiative aimed to promote actions to combat not only violence against children but also against young people and women (8).
Pri plènovanó eurùpskej kampane proti nèsiliu voｲi ™enèm v roku 1999 si iniciatóva Daphne uvedomila sÿvislosti medzi nèsilóm pèchan̅m na ™enèch a na deﾝoch a mlède™i a zamerala- sana podporu boja nielen proti nèsiliu voｲi deﾝom, ale aj mlède™i a ™enèm.8
A s a r e s u l t , f u n d - i n g for the initiative was renewed in 1998 and increased to ECU 5 million.
V dúsledku toho sa v roku 1998 «nancova-nie iniciatóvy obnovilo a zv̅þilo na 5 miliùnov ECU.
When the budget line was renewed for a third time in 1999, with a modest increase in project funding to a maximum of EUR 125 000, it was with a view to continuing action while a legal base was iden-ti«edandprocesseswerecompletedforamultiannualprogrammetobelaunchedin2000.
Keｵ sa v roku 1999 rozpoｲet tretó raz ob-novil a «nancovanienaprojektsamiernezv̅þilonamaximum125000EUR,bolotosv̅hﾋa-dom na ｵalþiu púsobnosﾝ, priｲom sa identi«kovalprèvnyzèkladaukonｲilsaproceszavedeniaviacroｲnïho programu plènovanïho na rok 2000.
) Dr June Kane, Communication Coordinator and Spokesperson for the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children, was a consultant to Unicef in 1997.
Európska spoluprâca s MVO aktîvnymi v boji proti nezâkonnêmu obchodovaniu s de╃mi a ich pohlavnêmu z n e u Š î v a n i u : Zâvery zasadania z 11. aprîla 1997 (Doc. R013VDAT).
In fact, in the tradition of many Commission programmes that have names sourced from the classics, Daphne makes reference to the young woman of Greek mythology who was chased by the god Apollo, who wished to ravage her.
Pri druhom okruhu otâzok sa pred samotnþm uskuto┘nenîm u v a Š o v a l o o potrebe ┛alùej h┰bkovej analþzy a diskusie.Mnohî sa ┘asto pþtajú na nâzov tejto iniciatîvy a pokúùajú sa ho deùifrova╃ ako akronym.
As Apollo touched her, Daphne was transformed into a laurel tree (Daphne in Greek) and thus her honour was saved. 葵ereference is, of course, to protection from sexual violence.) 葵 e c uijt - o K b e t w e e n ` c h i l d r e n ' and `young people' was not de#ned.In practice, most projects follow the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in de#ningachildasanyone under 18 years of age. `Young people', on the other hand, is
V skuto┘nosti, v súlade s tradîciou mnohþch programov Komisie, ktorþch nâzvy ┘erpajú z klasiky, Daphne bola v grêckej mytológii mladâ Šena, ktorú boh
Learning from the lessons drawn each year from the Daphne initia-tive, the programme was extended to EFTA/EEA and central and east European countries, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey; local authorities were able to submit proposals; and associate part-
Stavajÿc na ka™doroｲn̅ch skÿsenostiach iniciatóvy Daphne, program sa rozþóril do krajón EFTA/EEA a strednej a v̅chodnej Eurùpy na Cyprus, Maltu a do Turecka; miestne samo-sprèvy mohli podèvaﾝ nèvrhy; a umo™nilo sa pridru™enï partnerstvo z kandidètskych krajón (preto™e «nancovanieaktivótprojektovvt̅chtokrajinèchneboloeþtemo™nï).Vrèmciprogra-mu Daphne bolo okrem toho mo™nï «nancovaﾝajprojektyvdﾊ™ke12mesiacov,dvaalebotriroky.
Submissions received and projects funded, 1997›2003
Prijatï nèvrhy a «nancovanïprojekty,1997›2003
(*) Note that, since the Daphne programme 2000›03 also funded multiannual projects from 2000, some projects continued in subsequent years and thus reduced the budget available for new projects.
(*) Vþimnite si, ™e keｵ™e program Daphne 2000 › 2003 «nancovalodroku2000tie™niekoﾋkoroｲnï projekty, niektorï projekty pokraｲovali v nasledujÿcich rokoch, teda rozpoｲet na novï projekty bol ni™þó. To vysvetﾋuje ni™þó poｲet projektov v roｲnom v̅bere poｲnÿc rokom 2001
The future: the Daphne II programme 2004›08
Budÿcnosﾝ: program Daphne II 2004 › 2008
In February 2003, the European Commission adopted a proposal establishing a second phase of the Daphne programme for the period 2004›08.
Vo februèri 2003 Eurùpska komisia prijala nèvrh druhej fèzy programu Daphne pre obdobie 2004 a™ 2008.
A decision on Daphne II was approved by the Council on 30 March 2004.
Rozhodnutie bolo schvèlenï na zasadnutó Rady 30. marca 2004.
The new programme was launched in May 2004.
Nov̅ program bol spusten̅ v mèji 2004.
The Commis-sion has not substantially changed the objectives, the mechanisms or the targets of the Daphne programme, but it has proposed a number of improvements with a view to enhanc-ing the impact of the programme.
Komisia v̅razne nezmenila ÿlohy, mechanizmy ani ciele programu Daphne, no navrhla rad zlepþenó v zèujme zv̅þenia ÿｲinnosti programu.
(a) An important improvement is the increase of the budget: EUR 50 million will be available for the period 2004›08, compared with EUR 20 million of the «rstprogramme.Anincreasein the budget is necessary in order to face both the consequences of enlargement to cen-tral and east European countries and the large demand from organisations in order to at least reduce frustration that sometimes appears among the applicants.
a) V̅znamn̅m zlepþenóm je zv̅þenie rozpoｲtu. Na roky 2004 › 2008 bude uvoﾋnen̅ch 50 miliùnov EUR v porovnanó s 20 miliùnmi EUR, ktorï boli poskytnutï v rèmci prvïho progra-mu.
(b) The second improvement is the list of activities that can be supported.
b) Druh̅m zlepþenóm je zoznam ｲinnostó, ktorï mo™no podporovaﾝ.
The Daphne II pro-gramme is more exhaustive, compared with Daphne I, about the types of activity, the ar-eas of action, which can be funded. It is foreseen that the programme comprise the fol-lowing types of activities:
Program Daphne II je v porovnanó s Daphne I oveﾋa dúslednejþó, pokiaﾋ ide o druhy ｲinnostó a oblasti púsobnosti, ktorï mo™no «nancovaﾝ.Programbymalzahﾕﾏaﾝnasledujÿcedruhyｲinnostó:
‡ identi«cationandexchangesofgoodpracticeandworkexperiencewithaviewinparticular to implementing preventive measures and assistance to victims;
‡ identi«kèciaavzèjomnèv̅menanajlepþóchpostupovapracovn̅chskÿsenostópredo-vþetk̅m s cieﾋom zaviesﾝ preventóvne opatrenia a pomúcﾝ obetiam;
‡ mapping surveys, studies and research;
‡ mapujÿce prieskumy, þtÿdie a v̅skum;