natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The second amendment came into force on 1 July 1995 and was brought about by Directive 94/10/EC.
Druh̅ do-datok vstÿpil do platnosti 1. jÿla 1995 a vyvolala ho smernica 94/10/ES.
As opposed to a regulation which `shall be binding in its entirety' and `directly applicable in all Member States'.
) Ako protiklad k nariadeniu, ktorï ¶je zèvêznï vo svojej celistvostiƒ a ¶je priamo uplatniteﾋnï vo vþetk̅ch ｲlensk̅ch þtètochƒ.
der to facilitate the access to products and to Information So-ciety services at crossborder level.
Kapitola VI: Próstup fyzick̅ch osúb a odvetvó priemyslu k informècièm a dostupnè pomoc aby t̅m uﾋahｲili próstup k v̅robkom a slu™bèm informaｲnej spoloｲnosti na medziþtètnej ÿrovni.
Economic operators can submit their comments on di/cultieswhichmayarisefromthe application of the texts, once adopted, in their «eld.
Podnikateﾋskï subjekty mú™u predlo™iﾝ svoje pripomienky t̅kajÿce sa ﾝa™kostó a problïmov, ku ktor̅m mú™e uplatnenóm prijat̅ch textov v danej oblasti dújsﾝ.
This is invaluable information for the Commission depart-ments, since they do not have equivalent practical experi-ence of the relevant «elds.
Ide o neoceniteﾋnï informècie pre oddelenia Komisie, keｵ™e v prósluþn̅ch oblastiach nemajÿ ekvivalentnï praktickï skÿ-senosti.
Although the implementation of Directive 98/34/EC is above all a matter for the parties involved in the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsandregulations - the Commission, Member States, the European and national standardisation bodies - information on draft na-tional standards and technical regulations is of considerable interest to all the citizens of the Union.
Napriek tomu, ™e implementècia smernice 98/34/ES sa t̅ka predovþetk̅m strèn, ktorï sÿ zapojenï do postupu poskytova-nia informèció v oblasti technick̅ch noriem a nariadenó › Komi-sia, ｲlenskï þtèty, eurùpske a nèrodnï normalizaｲnï orgèny › informècie o nèvrhu nèrodn̅ch noriem a technick̅ch predpisov sa podstatne t̅kajÿ zèujmu vþetk̅ch obｲanov ànie.
These comments may be sent directly to the relevant Com-mission departments or to the national authorities responsi-ble for administering Directive 98/34/EC in the «eldoftech-nical regulations.
Tieto pripomienky je mo™nï poslaﾝ priamo prósluþn̅m odde-leniam Komisie alebo nèrodn̅m orgènom zodpovedn̅m za riadenie smernice 98/34/ES v oblasti technick̅ch predpisov.
The Commission and Member States may then, on this basis, send comments or detailed opinions to the notifying Member State with a view to the removal of protectionist elements identi«edinthedraft.
Komisia a ｲlenskï þtèty mú™u potom na zèklade tohto posie-laﾝ pripomienky alebo podrobnï stanoviskè informujÿcemu ｲlenskïmu þtètu s cieﾋom odstrèniﾝ ochranèrske prvky na-chèdzajÿce sa v nèvrhu.
If the options open to the citizens and undertakings of the Eu-ropean Union under Directive 98/34/EC are to be exercised in full, private individuals and businesses must consult the sourc-es of information made available by the Commission.
Komisia nabèda vþetky podnikateﾋskï subjekty, ktorï sÿ sku-toｲn̅mi prijómateﾋmi oznamovacieho postupu, vrètane vþetk̅ch kategùrió prijómateﾋov slu™ieb informaｲnej spoloｲnos-ti (spoloｲnosti, profesionèli, spotrebitelia atｵ.), aby v dostatoｲ-nom predstihu zóskavali informècie o vþetk̅ch iniciatóvach plè-novan̅ch zo strany nèrodn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov a o vþetk̅ch nèvrhoch legislatóvy a predpisov, ktorï pripravili ｲlen-skï þtèty, aby mohli, ak budÿ chcieﾝ:
A list of these information sources is given below:
Zoznam t̅chto informaｲn̅ch zdrojov je uvede-n̅ ni™þie:
The Commission urges all economic operators, the real bene«-ciaries of the noti«cationprocedure,includingallthecatego-ries of recipients of Information Society services (companies, professionals, consumers, etc.), to inform themselves of all the initiatives planned by the national standardisation bodies and of all the draft legislation and regulations being prepared by the Member States at a su/cientlyearlystage,inordertobeable, should they so wish:
› zapojiﾝ sa do prèce na próprave noriem t̅kajÿcich sa ich ob-lasti púsobenia v normalizaｲnom v̅bore nèrodnïho orgènu, ktor̅ prècu inicioval,
Information published in the O / c i a l Jo u r n a l o ft h e E u r op e a n Union, Series C
Informècie zverejnenï v àradnom vestnóku Eurùpskej ÿnie, sïria C
› to take part in the work of preparing standards relating to their «eldofactivityinthestandardisationcommitteeofthenational body which has initiated this work;
› Ka™d̅ rok Komisia zverejﾏuje v àradnom vestnóku Eurùpskej ÿnie zoznam nov̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch aktivót, v̅konom kto-r̅ch poverila CEN, CENELEC alebo ETSI (v sÿlade s ｲlènkom 11 smernice).
› to anticipate the adoption of future national standards or technical regulations in other Member states, by adapting their production in order to comply with the precise content of these texts.
› vopred zohﾋadniﾝ prijatie budÿcich nèrodn̅ch noriem alebo technick̅ch predpisov v in̅ch ｲlensk̅ch þtètoch prispúso-benóm svojej v̅roby kvúli zabezpeｲeniu sÿladu s presn̅m obsahom t̅chto textov.
In this way, manufacturers can, when the time comes, immediately export products which comply fully with the requirements of these standards or regulations;
Tak̅mto spúsobom mú™u v̅robco-via, vo vhodnom ｲase, okam™ite vyvè™aﾝ v̅robky, ktorï sÿ v ÿplnom sÿlade s po™iadavkami tak̅chto noriem alebo predpisov,
› to express their views on necessary amendments to planned technical regulations which may form barriers to trade, in or-
› vyjadriﾝ svoje nèzory na potrebnï doplnky plènovan̅ch technick̅ch predpisov, ktorï by mohli prekè™aﾝ obchodu,
› Each year, the Commission publishes statistics in the OJEU on the noti«cationsreceived,thereactionstothesenoti«ca-tions, and infringement proceedings instituted during the year for failure to fu l « l t h e o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r t h e D i r e c t i v e ( i n a c c o r d a n c e with Article 11 of the Directive).
› Ka™d̅ rok Komisia zverejﾏuje v à. v. ES þtatistiky o prijat̅ch oznèmeniach, reakcièch na tieto oznèmenia a konania o po-ruþenó zaｲatï poｲas roka z dúvodu nesplnenia povinnostó podﾋa smernice (v sÿlade s ｲlènkom 11 smernice) (76).
national standardisation bodies (listed in Annex 2 to this booklet), in order to «ndinformationcommunicatedonnewwork entered in the national standards programmes.
› Mú™u po™iadaﾝ o nahliadnutie do mesaｲnïho registra na Centrèlnom sekretariète CEN/CENELEC, ktor̅ je distribuova-n̅ vþetk̅m nèrodn̅m normalizaｲn̅m orgènom (ich zoznam je v Prólohe 2 k tejto próruｲke), aby naþli informècie oznème-nï o novej prèci, ktorï sÿ zaｲlenenï do nèrodn̅ch normali-zaｲn̅ch programov.
› They can consult the reports on the operation of the Direc-tive, both as regards the `standards' and the `technical regu-lations' aspect, which are regularly published by the Commission.
› Mú™u kontaktovaﾝ nèrodnï normalizaｲnï orgèny, ｲlenov CEN alebo CENELEC, aby zóskali texty nèvrhov zaｲlenenï do nèrodn̅ch normalizaｲn̅ch programov.
› In order to facilitate industry's access to national technical regulations, the Commission has developed a comprehen-sive database of all n o t i « e d d r a ft t e x t s c a l l e d T R I S ( T e c h n i c a l R effg u l a t i o n s Information System) which is accessible to the public on the Europa website.
› Mú™u nahliadnuﾝ do sprèv o ｲinnosti smernice, pokiaﾋ ide o aspekt ¶noriemƒ a tie™ o aspekt ¶technick̅ch predpisovƒ, kto-rï Komisia pravidelne zverejﾏuje (78).
› The Commission issues press releases to inform private indi-viduals and companies of infringement proceedings against texts of technical regulations adopted in breach of the Direc-tive.
› Kvúli uﾋahｲeniu próstupu odvetvó priemyslu k nèrodn̅m technick̅m predpisom, zostavila Komisia vþeobecnÿ data-bèzu vþetk̅ch oznèmen̅ch textov nèvrhov, ktorè sa naz̅va TRIS (Informaｲn̅ systïm technick̅ch predpisov) a je próstup-nè verejnosti na internetovej strènke Eurùpskej ÿnie (77).
This information can be used by a private individual or a company before a national authority, in support of the prin-ciple of non-applicability of a technical regulation adopted in breach of Directive 98/34/EC.
› Komisia vydèva tlaｲovï sprèvy s cieﾋom poskytovaﾝ informè-cie fyzick̅m osobèm a spoloｲnostiam o konaniach o poruþe-nó textov t̅kajÿcich sa technick̅ch predpisov prijat̅ch pri poruþenó smernice.
The inapplicability of the `non noti«ed'technicalregula-tions
Neuplatniteﾋnosﾝ ¶neoznèmen̅chƒ technick̅ch predpisov
In addition to the search system, the general public can use the automatic Alert System via this Website.
Ka™d̅, kto ho chce vyu™óvaﾝ, sa musó zaregistrovaﾝ a vybraﾝ si jednu alebo niekoﾋko oznamo-vacóch kategùrió.
All one needs to do is register and select one or several noti«cationcategories.TRISwill automatically e-mail the subscriber as soon as a new noti-«edtextinthechosencategoryorcategorieshasbeenreceived.If a draft under examination subsequently causes the subscrib-er problems or is likely to hinder trade relations in the European Union, he/she is invited to forward any comments and make any concerns known either to the Commission or to the author-ities responsible in his/her particular Member State.
TRIS poþle abonentovi hneｵ po prijató no-vïho oznèmenïho textu vo vybranej kategùrii alebo kate-gùrièch automaticky e-mailovÿ sprèvu. Ak nèvrh, ktor̅ je v procese skÿmania spúsobó nèsledne abonentovi problïmy alebo pravdepodobne sﾝa™ó obchodnï vzﾝahy v Eurùpskej ÿnii, mú™e tento poslaﾝ akïkoﾋvek pripomienky a prejaviﾝ ak̅koﾋvek zèujem buｵ Komisii alebo zodpovedn̅m ÿradom v danom ｲlenskom þtète.
The above cited sources of information enable private individ-uals and other interested parties to be informed of the noti«ca-tions and to ensure that technical regulations with which they are obliged to comply have indeed been noti«ed.Ifthisisnotso, they can assert their rights through reference to the case-law of the Court of Justice.
Vyþþie citovanï zdroje informèció umo™ﾏujÿ fyzick̅m osobèm a in̅m zèujmov̅m skupinèm, aby boli informovanï o oznème-niach a zaisﾝujÿ, ™e technickï predpisy, s ktor̅mi sÿ povinnï dodr™aﾝ sÿlad, boli skutoｲne oznèmenï. Ak tomu tak nie je, mú™u svoje prèva uplatniﾝ prostrednóctvom odkazu na prece-dentnï prèvo Sÿdneho dvora.
› Interested parties may also obtain the text of draft technical regulations from the central units of the Member States (list-ed in Annex 1 to this booklet) which are responsible for noti-fying the Commission of national draft technical regula-tions.
Rozsudok v própade ¶CIA Securityƒ a rozsudok ¶Unileverƒ, vyne-sen̅ na zèklade postupu predbe™nïho opatrenia Sÿdnym dvo-rom, sÿ kﾋÿｲovï prvky v própade ochrany fyzick̅ch osúb voｲi
› They can ask to consult the monthly register at the Central Secretariat of CEN/CENELEC, which is distributed to all the
› Zèujmovï skupiny tie™ obdr™ia text nèvrhu technick̅ch predpisov od centrèlnych jednotiek ｲlensk̅ch þtètov (kto-r̅ch zoznam je v Prólohe 1 k tejto próruｲke), ktorï sÿ zodpo-vednï za informovanie Komisie o nèvrhu nèrodn̅ch tech-nick̅ch predpisov.
als against failure on the part of Member States to ful«ltheirobligations under Directive 98/34/EC.
zlyhaniu na strane ｲlensk̅ch þtètov pri plnenó svojich povin-nostó podﾋa smernice 98/34/ES.
is monitored before its adoption by the Commission and the other Member States (with the exceptions mentioned in the Directive).
(8/) n̅ pred jeho prijatóm zo strany Komisie a ostatn̅ch ｲlensk̅ch þtètov (okrem v̅nimiek uveden̅ch v smernici).
If this is not the case, a company, for example, can cite the inapplicability of the regulation in question, should it be accused of non-compliance by an authority.
Ak tomu tak nie je, spoloｲnosﾝ mú™e napróklad citovaﾝ neuplatniteﾋnosﾝ pred-metnïho predpisu v própade, ™e bude zo strany ÿradu obvine-nè z nesÿladu.
In the event of any national court proceedings resulting from the matter, the court must then set aside the application of the regulation and cannot, as a result, regard it as having been breached.
V própade akïhokoﾋvek nèrodnïho sÿdneho ko-nania, ktorï vypl̅va z danej zèle™itosti, musó potom sÿd zruþiﾝ uplatﾏovanie predpisu a nèsledne ho nemú™e chèpaﾝ ako po-ruþenie predpisu.
These judgments specify the consequences of the adoption of a technical regulation in breach of the obligations laid down by Directive 98/34/EC: private individuals can invoke Articles 8 and 9 of the Directive before the national court, which must refuse to apply a national technical regulation that has not been n o t i « e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e D i r e c t i v e o r w h i c h has been noti«edbuthasbeenadoptedduringandnot after the expiration of the standstill period laid down by the Directive.
Tieto rozsudky þpeci«kujÿdúsledkyprijatiatechnickïhopred-pisu pri poruþenó povinnostó stanoven̅ch smernicou 98/34/ES: fyzickï osoby mú™u uplatniﾝ ｲlènky 8 a 9 smernice pred nèrod-n̅m sÿdom, ktor̅ musó odmietnuﾝ uplatnenie nèrodnïho technickïho predpisu, ktor̅ nebol oznèmen̅ v sÿlade so smer-nicou alebo ktor̅ bol oznèmen̅, ale bol prijat̅ poｲas a nie po uplynutó obdobia preruþenia prèc na technickom predpise sta-novenïho smernicou.
Private individuals and enterprises have the possibility to en-sure that any technical regulation adopted by a Member State
Toto potvrdenie princópu neuplatniteﾋnosti nèrodn̅ch technic-k̅ch predpisov, ktorï neboli oznèmenï voｲi tretóm stranèm podporuje pozóciu, ktorÿ Komisia prijala u™ v roku 1986 (80)
This sanctioning of the principle of the non-applicability to third parties of national technical regulations which have not been noti«ed,supportsthepositionwhichhadbeenalreadyadopted by the Commission in 1986 and enhances the pro-tection of the interests of private individuals and enterprises in this respect.
Fyzickï osoby a podniky majÿ mo™nosﾝ zabezpeｲiﾝ, aby bol ka™d̅ technick̅ predpis prijat̅ ｲlensk̅m þtètom monitorova- a posilﾏuje v tomto ohﾋade ochranu zèujmov fyzick̅ch osúb a podnikov.
Judgment of 30th April 1996 `Interpretation of Article 30 of the EC Treaty and of Directive 83/189/EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsandregulations-Nationallegislationonthemarketingofalarmsystemsandnetworks-Prioradministrativeapproval,'deliv-ered in Case C-194/94 `CIA Security' [1996] ECR I-2201 and Judgment of 26th September 2000 `Interpretation of Council Directive 83/189/EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsandregulations›Obligationsofnoti«cationandpostponementofadoption› Ap-plicability in civil proceedings', delivered in Case C-443/98 `Unilever' [2000] ECR I-7535.'
) Rozsudok z 30. apróla 1996 ¶Interpretècia ｲlènku 30 Zmluvy o ES Smernice 83/189/EHS, stanovujÿcej postup pri poskytovanó informèció v oblasti technick̅ch noriem a predpisov › Nèrodnè legislatóva o marketingu v̅stra™n̅ch systïmov a sietó › Pred sprèvnym schvèlenómƒ, doruｲen̅ v Própade C-194/94 ¶CIA Securityƒ [1996] ECR I-2201 a Rozsudok z 26. septembra 2000 ¶Interpretècia Smernice Rady 83/189/EHS stanovujÿcej postup pri poskytovanó informèció v oblasti tech-nick̅ch noriem a predpisov › Oznamovacie povinnosti a odlo™enie prijatia › Uplatniteﾋnosﾝ v obｲianskych konaniachƒ, doruｲen̅ v Própade C-443/98 ¶Unileverƒ [2000] ECR I-7535.ƒ
C o n c l uffs i o n role in the case of national authorities, notably as regards the need to make a clear legal distinction between operators act-ing under the freedom of establishment and those only wish-ing to provide crossborder services.
Z è v e r pokiaﾋ ide o potrebu jasnïho prèvneho rozlóþenia medzi sub-jektmi konajÿcimi na zèklade slobody usadenia sa a t̅mi, ktoró si iba ™elajÿ poskytovaﾝ cezhraniｲnï slu™by.
In the context of the 2005 renewed Lisbon strategy and as part of its Better Regulation programme, the Commission an-nounced its intention to launch a comprehensive initiative to ensure that the regulatory framework in the EU meets the re-quirements of the twenty-«rstcentury.Closercooperationwiththe Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU and the reinforce-ment of the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national level and with stakeholders were identi«edaskey action lines in this respect.
Toto je zrejmï, okrem inïho aj zo zahrnutia klauzuly o vzèjom-nom uznèvanó do urｲit̅ch nèvrhov textov nèrodnej legislatóvy vo fèze oznamovania; dobrej vúle, ktorÿ ｲlenskï þtèty prejavujÿ pri naprèvanó ch̅b odhalen̅ch Komisiou alebo in̅mi ｲlensk̅-mi þtètmi v oznèmen̅ch nèvrhoch; zo sÿladu s povinnosﾝou oznèmiﾝ plènovanï novï normalizaｲnï aktivity a nèvrhy tech-nick̅ch predpisov vo vêｲþine própadov; a z r̅chleho rozvoja eurùpskej normalizècie.
This is evident, among other things, from the inclusion of the mutual recognition clause in certain draft national legislative texts at the n o t i « c a t i o n s t a g e ; t h effg o o d w i l l s h o w n b y t h e Mffe mb e r States in correcting errors discovered by the Commission or by the other Member States in noti«eddrafts;thecompli-ance in the vast majority of cases with the obligation to notify planned new standardisation activities and draft technical reg-ulations; and from the rapid development of European stand-ardisation.
V kontexte obnovenej Lisabonskej stratïgie z roku 2005 a ako sÿｲasﾝ jej programu lepþej regulècie oznèmila Komisia svoj zè-mer zaｲaﾝ vþeobecnÿ iniciatóvu na zabezpeｲenie toho, aby re-gulaｲn̅ rèmec v Eà spﾊﾏal po™iadavky dvadsiateho prvïho sto-roｲia. U™þia spoluprèca s ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi na zabezpeｲenie trvalïho uplatﾏovania princópu lepþóch nariadenó v Eà a posil-nenia konþtruktóvneho dialùgu medzi vþetk̅mi regulaｲn̅mi orgènmi na eurùpskej i nèrodnej ÿrovni a medzi zèujmov̅mi skupinami boli v tomto ohﾋade identi«kovanïakokﾋÿｲovïopatrenia.
In more or less 95% of the cases where the Commission reacted in order to bring the national draft regulations into conformity with Community law, Member States agreed to carry out the necessary changes and to align their legislation with EC law, thus avoiding the launching of the more cumbersome infringe-ment procedures by the Commission.
Vo viac ne™ 95 % própadov, keｵ Komisia reagovala, aby zabez-peｲila sÿlad nèvrhov nèrodn̅ch predpisov so zèkonom Spolo-ｲenstva, sa ｲlenskï þtèty dohodli na vykonanó nevyhnutn̅ch zmien a na zosÿladenó svojej legislatóvy s prèvom Eà, ｲóm prediþli zahèjeniu ﾝa™kopèdnych konanó o poruþenó zo strany Komisie.
The cooperation and dis-cussion fostered between Member States through the 98/34 procedure is evidenced by the fact that between 2002 and 2004, for instance, Member States exchanged 230 detailed opinions
Spoluprècu a diskusiu podporovanÿ medzi ｲlensk̅mi þtètmi prostrednóctvom postupu 98/34 dokazuje aj skutoｲnosﾝ, ™e napróklad v rokoch 2002 a 2004 si ｲlenskï þtèty vymenili 230 podrobn̅ch stanovósk.
It is clear from a review of more than twenty years' experience with the implementation of the N o t i « c a t i o n P r o c e d u r e d u r i n g w h i c h time the Commission has screened more than 10.000 draft national measures that signi«cantprogresshasbeenmade in preventing the emergence of new barriers to trade, simultaneously saving onerous legal, administrative and eco-nomic costs.
Z viac ako dvadsaﾝroｲn̅ch skÿsenostó s implementèciou ozna-movacieho postupu poｲas, ktorïho Komisia preskÿmala viac ako 10 000 nèvrhov nèrodn̅ch opatrenó, vypl̅va, ™e bol do-siahnut̅ znaｲn̅ pokrok v oblasti prevencie vzniku nov̅ch pre-kè™ok obchodu, priｲom sÿｲasne doþlo k redukcii zaﾝa™ujÿcich prèvnych, administratóvnych a ekonomick̅ch nèkladov.
In this respect the 98/34 Noti«cationproceduremay be considered a precursor for better regulation as it has proved to be an e.ectiveinstrumentofindustrialpolicyandcompetitiveness which has created various channels of com-munication between all the main stakeholders.
V tom-to ohﾋade je mo™nï oznamovacó postup 98/34 pova™ovaﾝ za predchodcu lepþej regulècie, keｵ™e sa ukèzalo, ™e ide o ÿｲinn̅ nèstroj priemyselnej politiky a konkurencieschopnosti, ktor̅ vytvoril rúzne komunikaｲnï kanèly medzi vþetk̅mi hlavn̅mi zèujmov̅mi skupinami.
Consequently, it represents a model of regulatory transparency and adminis-trative cooperation whose scope of application might be fur-ther extended and provide similar bene«tsinothersectors.
Nèsledne, predstavuje model regulaｲ-nej transparentnosti a administratóvnej spoluprèce, ktorej roz-sah uplatnenia je mo™nï ｵalej rozþirovaﾝ a poskytovaﾝ podob-nï v̅hody v in̅ch sektoroch.
This progress in European integration, which facilitates the maintenance and growth of trade, is the fruit of the joint e.ortsof the Commission and the Member States.
Tento pokrok v procese eurùpskej integrècie, ktor̅ uﾋahｲuje zvlèdnutie a rast obchodu, je v̅sledkom spoloｲn̅ch snèh Ko-misie a ｲlensk̅ch þtètov.
By acting together to prevent the emergence of new technical barriers to trade, they reduce the need for legislation on a Community level, and at the same time enhance the quality of the technical stand-ards and regulations adopted at national level.
Spoloｲn̅m konanóm zameran̅m na prevenciu vzniku nov̅ch technick̅ch prekè™ok obchodu zni-™ujÿ potrebu legislatóvy na ÿrovni Spoloｲenstva a sÿｲasne zvy-þujÿ kvalitu technick̅ch noriem a predpisov prijat̅ch na nè-rodnej ÿrovni.
Directive 98/34/EC is the key instrument of Community policy to combat barri-ers to trade which has made this possible.
Smernica 98/34/ES je kﾋÿｲov̅m nèstrojom politiky Spoloｲenstva v oblasti boja proti prekè™kam obchodu, ktor̅ bol t̅mto umo™nen̅.
Although the completion of the internal market in 1993 does not appear to have diminished Member States' need to enact detailed legislation on products, they have become gradually familiar with the rules of the internal market, the principle of mutual recognition arising from the `Cassis de Dijon' precedent and the principles of transparency and co-operation, which now govern their activities in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsand regulations.
Hoci sa nezdè, ™e dokonｲenie vnÿtornïho trhu v roku 1993 zmenþilo potreby ｲlensk̅ch þtètov v oblasti uzèkonenia podrob-nej legislatóvy t̅kajÿcej sa v̅robkov, ｲlenskï þtèty sa postupne oboznamujÿ s pravidlami vnÿtornïho trhu, s princópom vzèjom-nïho uznèvania vypl̅vajÿceho z precedensu própadu ¶Cassis de Dijonƒ a s princópmi transparentnosti a spoluprèce, ktorï riadia ich aktivity v oblasti technick̅ch noriem a predpisov.
Similarly, even if more recently, in the area of services this mechanism has played an important educational
Podobne, dokonca eþte neskúr, zohral tento mechanizmus dúle™itÿ vzdelè-vaciu ÿlohu v oblasti slu™ieb v própade nèrodn̅ch ÿradov, najmê
Despite its success, the procedure laid down by Directive 98/34/EC could still be improved. This requires clear identi«cationof the points in need of improvement.
Pokiaﾋ ide o prósluþnï normy, najｲastejþóm nedostatkom uvè-dzan̅m zo strany eurùpskych normalizaｲn̅ch orgènov pri skÿ-
in defending their legitimate interests by informing the Commis-sion or the national authorities about certain drafts which, if adopted, would create technical barriers.
nèrodn̅ch ÿradov o konkrïtnych nèvrhoch, ktorï by v própade prijatia tvorili technickï prekè™ky.
The involvement of in-dividual enterprises and particularly small and medium-sized businesses, which are often more reserved, could be improved.
Je mo™nï zlepþiﾝ zapojenie individuèlnych podnikov a najmê mal̅ch a stredne veﾋk̅ch podnikov, ktorï sÿ ｲasto rezervovanejþie.
They should not hesitate to seek information and speak up, even in a con«dentialway,whentheyconsiderthatthetechnicalprod-uct speci«cationsbeingpreparedincountriestowhichtheyex-port could harm their interests, if adopted as they stand.
Nemali by vèhaﾝ hﾋa-daﾝ informècie a vyjadrovaﾝ sa, aj s vyu™itóm princópu dúvernos-ti, ak si myslia, ™e þpeci«kècietechnick̅chv̅robkovpripravenïv krajinèch, do ktor̅ch vyvè™ajÿ, by mohli poþkodiﾝ ich zèujmy, ak by boli prijatï v sÿｲasnej podobe.
The Commission has taken some important steps to facilitate the participation of industry.
Komisia prijala urｲitï dúle™itï opatrenia s cieﾋom uﾋahｲiﾝ zapo-jenie odvetvó priemyslu.