natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 19 %
Medzinèrodn̅ rozsah partnerstva: 19 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 17 %
Zdroje/prostriedky pridelenï projektu: 17 %
Political interest/visibility: 14 %
Politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenie: 14 %
Other (lobbying, appropriate and personalised methodological approach): 2 %
Inï (lobbing, primeran̅ a personalizovan̅ metodick̅ próstup): 2 %
The main factors contributing to these impacts are the quality of the outputs (54 % of the projects with impact), the level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners (44 %), the degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries(39%),theadequacyoftheprojectobjectives to the context (35 %) and the degree of involvement of representatives of target groups (33 %).
Najvêｲþó podiel na vzniku t̅chto vplyvov mali nasledovnï faktory: kvalita v̅stupov (54 % projektov), odbornè ÿroveﾏ a komplementarita partnerov projektu (44 %), miera zaanga™o-vanosti u™óvateﾋov/prójemcov (39 %), adekvètnosﾝ cieﾋov projektu vzhﾋadom na kontext (35 %) a miera zaanga™ovanosti predstaviteﾋov cieﾋov̅ch skupón (33 %).
In fact, the close involvement of target groups and end-bene«ciariesthroughouttheprojectcontributestothe production of credible and valid outputs tailored to their needs and it favours the wide reception/acceptability of these outputs. Such participation is also valuable in raising their awareness and in turn encouraging them to reach broader audiences.
Dynamickï zaanga-™ovanie cieﾋov̅ch skupón a koneｲn̅ch prójemcov poｲas celïho trvania projektu toti™ prispie-va k vytvoreniu spoﾋahliv̅ch a opodstatnen̅ch v̅stupov, ktorï sÿ primeranï ich potrebèm a napomèha vnómaniu a akceptècii t̅chto v̅stupov þirokou verejnosﾝou. àｲasﾝ tohto typu zèroveﾏ zvyþuje informovanosﾝ t̅chto skupón a nabèda ich k zóskavaniu vêｲþieho poｲtu stÿ-pencov.
The joint participation of target groups and end-bene«ciariesisalsoimportantinordertofavour exchanges and understanding between them.
Spoloｲnè ÿｲasﾝ cieﾋov̅ch skupón a koneｲn̅ch prójemcov je dúle™itè i pre ich vzèjomnï pocho-penie a v̅menu nèzorov.
As for the impacts on target groups, the main limiting factors of impact are the limited level of resources/means allocated to the projects (10 % of projects with impacts) and the non-timeliness of dissemination activities (5 % of projects).
Po sa t̅ka vplyvov na cieﾋovï skupiny, hlavn̅mi limitujÿcimi faktormi vplyvu sÿ obmedzenï mno™stvo zdrojov/prostriedkov pridelen̅ch projektom (10 % projektov) a neskorï propagaｲ-nï aktivity (5 % projektov).
Impacts on legislation, policy and institutional behaviours
Vplyv na legislatóvu, zau™óvanï metùdy a sprèvanie inþtitÿció
It should be « r s t nffo t e d t h a t t h e p r i m a r y a i m o f D a p h n e i s nffo t t op r o po s e l e g i s l a t i v e mffe a s u r e s o r to change policies.
V prvom rade treba zdúrazniﾝ, ™e Daphne sa nezameriava na predkladanie legislatóvnych opat-renó alebo zmenu zau™óvan̅ch metùd.
However, as a side-e.ectduetothestrongcommitmentanddedicationof some organisations, some legislative or policy changes occurred. This can be seen as a plus.
Avþak v dúsledku veﾋkej zaanga™ovanosti a nadþenia niektor̅ch organizèció sa vyskytlo niekoﾋko legislatóvnych a praktick̅ch zmien, ｲo mú™eme vnómaﾝ ako pozitóvum.
These impacts are:
Ide o nasledovnï vplyvy:
Visibility/debate of violence in the public arena
Þirokè verejnè diskusia o problematike nèsilia
The most frequent impacts concern di.erentcategoriesofinstitutionsandconsistof`in-creased awareness of issues of violence', `visibility/debate of violence in the public arena' as well as `more openness to experiences from other countries/settings'.
Najｲastejþie vplyvy, ktorï sa t̅kajÿ rúznych kategùrió inþtitÿció sÿ nasledovnï: ¶vêｲþia infor-movanosﾝ o otèzkach nèsiliaƒ, ¶þirokè verejnè diskusia o problematike nèsiliaƒ a ¶vêｲþia otvo-renosﾝ skÿsenostiam z in̅ch krajón/inïho prostrediaƒ.
Those impacts are main-ly attributable to the distribution of materials to local/regional/national authorities, ministries and/or Members of Parliament as well as to the participation of such organisations in confer-ences, workshops and/or seminars.
Zèsluhu na ich vzniku mè najmê distri-bÿcia materièlov lokèlnym/regionèlnym/þtètnym orgènom, ministerstvèm a/alebo ｲlenom parlamentu ako aj ÿｲasﾝ t̅chto organizèció na konferencièch, workshopoch a/alebo seminè-roch.
They can be summarised by saying that Daphne contrib-uted to the recognition of some issues of violence and to feeding discussions on how to «ghtagainst violence.
Celkovo mú™eme povedaﾝ, ™e program Daphne prispel k zviditeﾋneniu niektor̅ch otèzok t̅kajÿcich sa nèsilia a zorganizovaniu ™iv̅ch diskusió o spúsoboch boja proti nèsiliu.
Several project coordinators also reported that their Daphne project gave them more visibility and credibility to convince authorities.
Niekoﾋkó koordinètori projektov tie™ uviedli, ™e vｵaka programu Daphne sa dostali viac do povedomia a mali vêｲþiu dúveryhodnosﾝ pri presviedｲanó ÿradov.
They obviously are less frequent due to their higher degree of di/cultyinbeingachieved.
Mú™e ósﾝ napróklad o vy-tvorenie komisie na zhodnotenie stavu a vytvorenie stratïgió, doplnkovï «nancovanieｲiopat-renia verejn̅ch orgènov. Be™nejþie sa vyskytujÿ v projektoch koordinovan̅ch MVO (37 % pro-jektov) ne™ v projektoch koordinovan̅ch inou organizèciou (16 %).
This poses question be-cause one would have expected that projects led by (local) public authorities would have had greater facilities to approach and reach the competent (national) authority.
Tento fakt vyvolèva otèz-niky, preto™e by sa dalo oｲakèvaﾝ, ™e projekty riadenï (miestnymi) verejn̅mi orgènmi budÿ maﾝ vêｲþie mo™nosti oslovovaﾝ kompetentn̅ (þtètny) orgèn.
The most illustrative cases of `emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives' are:
Uvèdzame najlepþie próklady ¶vzniku lokèlnych, regionèlnych, celoþtètnych verejne «nanco-van̅ch iniciatóvƒ:
‡ development of Caritas a n t i - t r a / c k i n g p r o j e c t i n I t a l y s po n s o r e d b y t h e E C S T OP I I f u n d i n g l i n e and its expansion in Spain and Romania, change of the Lithuanian national strategy on t r a / c k i n g , a n d r e c e p t i o nffo f U N a n d o t h e r E u r op e a n cffo u n t r y f u n d i n g b y a L a t v i a n N G O t offe x p a n d its work on tra/cking;
‡ Próprava projektu Caritas zameranïho na boj proti nezèkonnïmu obchodu v Taliansku, kto-r̅ « n a n c o v a l « n a n ｲ n ̅ o d b o r E à S T O P I I a jehorozþóreniev Þpanielskua Rumunsku,zmenaceloþtètnej litovskej stratïgie voｲi nezèkonnïmu obchodu a informovanie lotyþskej MVO o «-nanｲnej podpore z OSN a in̅ch eurùpskych krajón v zèujme kvalitnejþieho boja proti nezè-konnïmu obchodu.
‡ launch of national laboratories of violence against women in Belgium and Ireland;
‡ Otvorenie nèrodn̅ch laboratùrió nèsilia voｲi ™enèm v Belgicku a Órsku.
‡ creation of a new information/counselling service for victims of family violence at a police setting in Portugal;
‡ Spróstupnenie nov̅ch informaｲn̅ch/poradensk̅ch slu™ieb pre obete domèceho nèsilia na policajnej stanici v Portugalsku.
‡ expansion of the training sessions addressing black and migrant groups on domestic violence from local level (in the Netherlands) to Birmingham and Ireland;
‡ Rozþórenie þkolenó o domècom nèsiló pre ｲernochov a prisﾝahovalcov z miestnej ÿrovne (v Ho-landsku) do Birminghamu a Órska.
‡ local authority (Equal Opportunity Commission) sponsorship of a campaign against violence on women; it is still collaborating;
‡ Miestny orgèn (Komisia pre rovnosﾝ próle™itostó) «nancovalkampaﾏprotinèsiliuvoｲi™enèma i v sÿｲasnosti je v tejto sfïre aktóvny.
‡ development of a treatment programme for all Internet sex o . e n d e r s i n t h e U K a s a r e s u l t o f a n Irish-led project;
‡ Próprava lieｲebnïho programu pre vþetk̅ch internetov̅ch sexuèlnych delikventov v Spoje-nom krèﾋovstve, ktorïho vznik podnietil órsky projekt.
‡ creation of a Forensic Nursing Committee in Ireland for women victims of rape;
‡ Vytvorenie Komisie sÿdneho opatrovnóctva pre ™eny, ktorï sa stali obeﾝami znèsilnenia v Ór-sku.
‡ creation of a working group on sexual abuse by the Belgian Flemish authorities, which fund-ed a follow-up project;
‡ Flèmske orgèny v Belgicku vytvorili pracovnÿ skupinu zaoberajÿcu sa pohlavn̅m zneu™óva-nóm, ktorè «nancovalanèsledn̅projekt.
‡ provision of further funding to project activities by the Regional Government of Linz (Ûst), previously uninterested in responses to tra/cking;
‡ Prósﾋub ｵalþieho « n a n c o v a n i a p r o j e k t o v ̅ c h a k t i v ó t r e g i o n è l n o u v l è d o u v L i n z i ( R a k ÿ s k o ) , k t o - r è predt̅m nejavila zèujem o rieþenie problematiky nezèkonnïho obchodu.
‡ establishment by the Portuguese government, in May 2000, of the national helpline for vic-tims of domestic violence;
‡ Portugalskè vlèda zalo™ila v mèji 2000 celoþtètnu linku pomoci pre obete domèceho nèsilia.
‡ creation within the partner `Regione Marche' (Italy) of a regional coordination table on pros-titution and tra/ckingwiththeparticipationoftheregionalauthoritiesandthefourprov-inces.
‡ Próprava regionèlnej konferencie o prostitÿcii a nezèkonnom obchode v rèmci partnerstva ¶Regione Marcheƒ (Taliansko), ktorej sa zÿｲastnili zèstupcovia regionèlnych orgènov a 4 pro-vinció.
The impact `legislative/regulatory change' refers more to the promotion of the circumstances favouring legislative/regulatory change than to the change itself.
Vplyv ¶legislatóvne/regulaｲnï zmenyƒ treba chèpaﾝ skúr ako propagèciu priazniv̅ch postojov voｲi zavèdzaniu legislatóvnych/regulaｲn̅ch zmien, ne™ ako zavedenie samotn̅ch zmien.
This promotion notably consists of feeding debates with the expertise, the data and the results obtained through the projects.
Tèto propagècia by sa mala realizovaﾝ najmê pomocou ™iv̅ch diskusió, v ktor̅ch sa vyu™ijÿ poznat-ky a v̅sledky jednotliv̅ch projektov.
Illustrative cases are:
Na ilustrèciu niekoﾋko prókladov:
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e c r e a t i o nffo f a n e w S e x O . e n c e B i l l i n t h e U K ;
‡ Vplyv na vytvorenie novïho nèvrhu zèkona o sexuèlnych deliktoch v Spojenom krèﾋovstve.
‡ the Defensores del Pueblo in Spain have started to take on the idea of special courts for children with rapid judgments.
‡ Defensores del Pueblo v Þpanielsku sa zaｲali zaoberaﾝ myþlienkou vytvorenia þpecièlnych sÿdov pre deti, ktorï by svoje rozsudky vynèþali v krètkom ｲasovom obdobó.
The Council of Europe published a book on sexual abuse with one chapter devoted to the project work;
Rada Eurùpy publikovala knihu o pohlavnom zneu™óvanó, ktorej jedna kapitola sa zaoberè projektovou prècou.
‡ inclusion of `same-sex partnerships' in the German civil law on protecting victims of domes-tic violence;
‡ Zahrnutie ¶partnerstiev ﾋudó rovnakïho pohlaviaƒ do nemeckïho zèkona o ochrane obetó domèceho nèsilia.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o n i n 2 0 0 2 o f t h e n e w Cffo m mstu n i tffy A c t i o n 9 7 / 15 4 / J A I i nffo r d e r t o i n c l u d e a l l the forms of contemporary slavery;
‡ Vplyv na prijatie novïho opatrenia Spoloｲenstva 97/154/JAI v roku 2002 tak, aby rieþilo vþet-ky formy modernïho otroctva.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o nffo f t h e n e w G e r m a n l a w G e w a l t s c hffu t z Gesetz on domestic violence according to which women can go to courts and apply for the o.enderstoleavetheabode;
‡ Vplyv na prijatie novïho nemeckïho zèkona ¶Gewaltschutz Gesetzƒ o domècom nèsiló, pod-ﾋa ktorïho sa ™eny mú™u obrètiﾝ na sÿd a po™adovaﾝ, aby ÿtoｲnók opustil ich próbytok.
‡ adoption by the Danish government of violence indicators and implementation in national action plans for violence against women;
‡ Adopcia indikètorov nèsilia dènskou vlèdou a ich implementècia v nèrodn̅ch akｲn̅ch plè-noch t̅kajÿcich sa nèsilia voｲi ™enèm.
‡ elaboration and approval of the Italian Regulation Act for Article 18 of the Immigration Con-solidation Act which promoted a national integrated system of social assistance and integra-tion projects and a national free hotline for the victims of tra/cking;
‡ Próprava a schvèlenie zmeny ｲlènku 18 talianskeho imigraｲno-konsolidaｲnïho zèkona, kto-rou sa zavèdza celoþtètny integrovan̅ systïm socièlnej pomoci, bezplatnè linka pomoci pre obete nezèkonnïho obchodu a podpora integraｲn̅ch projektov.
‡ amendment to the UK Mental Health Act based on evidence from the project coordinator concerning the issue of consent for women with learning disabilities, derived from the expe-rience gained in this project;
‡ Novela Zèkona o duþevnom zdravó v Spojenom krèﾋovstve, ktorè vyþla od koordinètora pro-jektu a t̅ka sa povolenó pre nevzdelèvateﾋnï ™eny, priｲom sa vyu™óvajÿ skÿsenosti zóskanï poｲas realizècie projektu.
‡ new procedures in Belgium to enable Roma children to continue their schooling despite their legal status in the country.
‡ Novï postupy v Belgicku, vｵaka ktor̅m sa rùmskym deﾝom umo™nó ｵalþie vzdelèvanie na-priek ich prèvnemu postaveniu v krajine.
The main factors contributing to these impacts on legislation/policy are the `quality of the outputs' (52 % of the projects with impact), the `level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners' (47 %), the `political interest/visibility' (32 %) and the `adequacy of the project objectives to the context' (25 %).
Hlavnï faktory, ktorï sa podieﾋali na vzniku t̅chto vplyvov na legislatóvu ｲi politiku, sÿ nasle-dovnï: ¶kvalita v̅stupovƒ (52 % projektov), ¶odbornè ÿroveﾏ partnerov projektu a ich kom-plementaritaƒ (47 %), ¶politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenieƒ (32 %) a ¶adekvètnosﾝ cieﾋov projektu vzhﾋadom na kontextƒ (25 %).
The factor `political interest/visibility' is also a limiting factor for 13 % of the projects.
Faktor ¶politick̅ zèujem/zviditeﾋnenieƒ je pre 13 % projektov limitujÿcim faktorom.
Some project partners might have an in‹uenceonthede«nitionofpoliticalprioritiesandtheirim-plementation.
Niektoró partneri projektov by mohli maﾝ vplyv na urｲovanie politick̅ch priorót a ich implementèciu.
In general, the emergence of political interest can be improved as follows:
Vo vþeobecnosti mo™no politick̅ zèujem zv̅þiﾝ nasledovn̅mi spúsobmi:
‡ by producing valid and credible outputs with the aim of gaining public support that in turn generates political interest;
‡ Produkovanóm reèlnych a dúveryhodn̅ch v̅stupov s cieﾋom zóskaﾝ verejnÿ podporu, ktorè vyvolè politick̅ zèujem;
‡ by having close contacts with key decision-makers and policy-makers during the project or at least by disseminating the outputs to them.
‡ àzkymi kontaktmi s hlavn̅mi verejn̅mi ｲiniteﾋmi a politikmi poｲas projektu alebo aspoﾏ ich informovanóm o v̅sledkoch.
Following this impact assessment, the Daphne programme can be seen as successful in con-tinuing the mobilisation of the NGO sector at all levels, resulting in many new partnerships and alliances that are working together for more comprehensive European policies on vio-lence.
Na zèklade tohto hodnotenia vplyvov mú™eme program Daphne pova™ovaﾝ za ÿspeþn̅ vo svojich pretrvèvajÿcich snahèch o mobilizovanie MVO na vþetk̅ch ÿrovniach. V dúsledku programu sa uzavrelo mnoho nov̅ch partnerstiev a spojenectiev, ktorï pracujÿ v zèujme vytvorenia jednotnejþóch eurùpskych postupov v otèzkach nèsilia.
In order to improve project selection and to maximise achievement and impact of the objec-tives, it is interesting to understand the factors of success and therefore the good practices developed by the successful projects.
Na ÿｲely kvalitnejþieho v̅beru projektov a maximalizovania cieﾋov a vplyvov je zaujómavï vþimnÿﾝ si faktory ÿspechu a kvalitnï metùdy vyvinutï ÿspeþn̅mi projektmi.
In Annex 2, 15 projects that have developed good prac-tices are presented.
V prólohe 2 je uveden̅ch 15 projektov, v rèmci ktor̅ch sa vytvorili kvalitnï metùdy.
The criteria used for the selection of these good practices are as follows:
Kritïriè v̅beru kvalitn̅ch metùd sÿ nasledovnï:
‡ compared with other projects in the same «eld,theprojecthassomethingremarkableconcerning one or several of the following aspects: methodology, outputs, impacts, man-agement, dissemination, partnership, participation of end-bene«ciaries,involvementoftarget groups or European-ness.
‡ V porovnanó s in̅mi projektmi v rovnakej oblasti, je na projekte pozoruhodnè niektorè z na-sledovn̅ch oblastó: metodika, v̅stupy, vplyvy, mana™ment, propagècia, partnerstvo, ÿｲasﾝ koneｲn̅ch prójemcov, zaanga™ovanosﾝ cieﾋov̅ch skupón ｲi eurùpskosﾝ.
This implies that the project is innovative in this regard or at least does much better than others in this respect;
To znamenè, ™e projekt je v tomto ohﾋade inovatóvny alebo je aspoﾏ v porovnanó s ostatn̅mi oveﾋa kvalitnejþó.
‡ the good practice was a key element that directly contributed to the achievements and impacts of the project.
‡ Kvalitnï metùdy boli pre dosiahnutie cieﾋov a vplyv projektu kﾋÿｲovï.
The evaluator has considered the extent and nature of impact from the project that can be attributed to that speci«cgoodpractice;
Pri hodnotenó sa po-sudzoval rozsah a povaha vplyvu projektu, ktorï mo™no pripósaﾝ konkrïtnej kvalitnej me-tùde.
‡ the project was a pioneer in «llingagap.Itisworthbeingfurtherdisseminatedorrepli-cated in response to similar needs elsewhere in Europe.
‡ Projekt bol priekopnókom v zaplnenó medzery. Mè zmysel ho ｵalej þóriﾝ ｲi aplikovaﾝ vo vzﾝa-hu k podobn̅m potrebèm v rèmci celej Eurùpy.
The 15 good practices mainly refer to the following cases:
15 kvalitn̅ch metùd sÿvisó najmê s nasledovn̅mi própadmi:
‡ end-bene«ciarieswereprotagonistsintheproject:theprojectinvolvedthemfromthebeginning and empowered them;
‡ Vｵaka projektu vznikol nov̅ próstup k tradiｲnïmu problïmu, a sóce rieþiﾝ problematiku nè-silia voｲi ™enèm zmenou postoja mu™ov › nèsilnókov.
‡ the project developed a unique methodology, involving all players and considering all solutions to bring prostitutes to autonomy;
‡ V rèmci projektu vznikol vysokokvalitn̅ dotaznók, ktor̅ napomèha kumulovaniu vysokïho percenta reakció.
‡ the project developed a new approach to a common problem, tackling the issue of violence against women by trying to change the male perpetrators' attitudes;
‡ Dobrè spoluprèca medzi medièlnymi a nemedièlnymi partnermi, vｵaka ktorej sa zv̅þila kvalita propagaｲn̅ch aktivót.
‡ the project developed a high-quality questionnaire favouring a high response rate to a survey;
‡ V projekte sa ÿspeþne vyu™il próstup naklonen̅ budovaniu kapacót, ktor̅ zahﾕﾏal personèl s viacnèsobnou kvali«kèciou,skÿsen̅chpartnerovaleboexistujÿcusieﾝasocièció.
‡ the project successfully used a capacity-building approach involving multi-skilled sta.,experienced partners or an existing network of associations;
‡ V̅sledky projektu majÿ vysok̅ potencièl transferu, nakoﾋko sa danè tïma v rèmci Eurùpy rieþila prv̅krèt, alebo z dúvodu jednoduchïho kopórovania próstupu a v̅stupov v in̅ch eurùpskych krajinèch.
Daphne implementation and delivery mechanisms
Implementaｲnï a expediｲnï mechanizmy programu Daphne
The opinions of the coordinators were solicited on the Daphne submission and contract pro-cedures, the Daphne website, the support from Daphne during the project and the evaluation and monitoring systems.
Nèzory koordinètorov boli zisﾝovanï pri predlo™enó programu Daphne, uzatvèranó kontraktu, na webovej strènke programu Daphne, poｲas poskytovania pomoci poｲas projektu a v rèmci hodnotiacich a monitoringov̅ch systïmov.
As for other parts of the survey, the «eldevaluatorshavevalidatedthe consistency of these opinions.
Po sa t̅ka ｵalþóch strèn prieskumu, odbornóci po-tvrdili konzistentnosﾝ t̅chto nèzorov.
This section considers the 218 projects funded from 1997 to 2003, except for the topics re-lated to the ex-post evaluation exercise that refers to the completed projects only.
V tejto ｲasti sa posudzuje 218 projektov «nancovan̅chvrokoch1997a™2003,okremtïmt̅kajÿcich sa ex post hodnotenia, ktorï sa t̅ka len ukonｲen̅ch projektov.
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne submission and contract procedures
Miera spokojnosti s predlo™enóm programu a uzatvorenóm kontraktu
Daphne submission and contract procedures
Predlo™enie programu Daphne a uzatvorenie kontraktu
% of satis«edcoordinators
% spokojn̅ch koordinètorov
Clarity of the calls for proposals
Zrozumiteﾋnosﾝ v̅ziev na predkladanie projektov
Clarity of guidelines and supporting documents at time of preparation of submission
Zrozumiteﾋnosﾝ pokynov a podporn̅ch materièlov v ｲase própravy a odovzdania
Promptness of the contracting p h a s e Q u a l i tffy of EC support during negotiation of cffo n t r a c t Q u a l i tffy of EC support during the preparation p h a s e T r a n s p a r e n c y of the selection process
R̅chly priebeh kontraktaｲnej f è z y K v a l i t a podpory Eà poｲas rokovanó o k o n t r a k t e K v a l i t a podpory Eà poｲas própravnej f è z y T r a n s p a r e n t n o s ﾝ v̅berovïho procesu
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne website
Miera spokojnosti s webovou strènkou programu Daphne
Usefulness of the Daphne website when preparing s u b m i s s i o n s T i mffe l i n e s s of the information on the w e b s i t e U s e r - f r i e n d l i n e s s of the w e b s i t e U s e f u l n e s s of the Daphne website as a means of sharing results of projects
U™itoｲnosﾝ webovej strènky pri próprave nèvrhu p r o j e k t u A k t u è l n o s ﾝ informèció na s t r è n k e J e d n o d u c h o s ﾝ pou™óvania strènky U™itoｲnosﾝ strènky ako prostriedku zdieﾋania v̅sledkov projektov
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne support during the project
Miera spokojnosti s poskytovanóm pomoci poｲas realizècie projektu
Daphne support during the project
Podpora zo strany Daphne poｲas projektu
Reachability of the EC s t a . d u r i n g t h e p r o j e c t R e l e v a n c e of advice/information received from the EC during the p r o j e c tP e r t i n e n c e and clarity of the comments made on the p r o j e c t s / a c cffo u n t s F l e x i b i l i tffy allowed by the EC in managing the cffo n t r a c tP r o m p t n e s s of the payment procedures
Dosiahnuteﾋnosﾝ personèlu Eà poｲas p r o j e k t u R e l e v a n t n o s ﾝ rèd/informèció obdr™an̅ch z Eà poｲas projektu Vhodnosﾝ a zrozumiteﾋnosﾝ komentèrov k p r o j e k t o m / ÿ ｲ t o m F l e x i b i l i t a umo™nenè zo strany Eà poｲas riadenia k o n t r a k t u R ̅ c h l o s ﾝ platobn̅ch procedÿr
Level of satisfaction with the evaluation and monitoring systems
Anal̅za miery spokojnosti s ¶transparentnosﾝou v̅berovïho procesuƒ a s ¶kvalitou podpory Eà poｲas própravnej fèzyƒ svedｲó o tom, ™e v posledn̅ch rokoch (2001 › 2003) je spokojn̅ vêｲþó poｲet koordinètorov v porovnanó s predchèdzajÿcimi rokmi.
% of satis«edprojectcoordinatorsovertime1998199920002001200252 33 50 66 61
% spokojn̅ch koordinètorov v jednotliv̅ch rokoch199719981999200020012002200358 52 33 50 66 61 63
Quality of EC support during preparation phase
Kvalita podpory Eà poｲas própravnej fèzy
Remark: Other examples of good practices and methodologies developed by Daphne projects (19) can be read on the Daphne website: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Poznèmka: Salþie próklady kvalitn̅ch metùd a metodiky, ktorï vziþli z projektov Daphne (19) si mú™ete preþtudovaﾝ na webovej strènke programu Daphne: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
From this brief overview it is clear that the Daphne experience has been rich indeed and that the aims of the European Parliament in establishing the Daphne initiative and the Daphne programme 2000›03 have been largely met.
Z tohto struｲnïho prehﾋadu je jasnï, ™e skÿsenosti Daphne sÿ skutoｲne bohatï a ™e ciele Eu-rùpskeho parlamentu stanovenï pri zakladanó iniciatóvy Daphne a programu Daphne 2000 › 2003 boli vo veﾋkej miere dosiahnutï.
The capacity of organisations in Europe to pro-tect children, young people and women from violence in its many forms has been enhanced.
Mo™nosti eurùpskych organizèció na ochranu detó, mlède™e a ™ien pred nèsilóm v mnoh̅ch jeho formèch sa rozþórili.
Children, young people and women have been protected and supported.
Deti, mlède™ a ™eny zóskali ochranu a pomoc.