natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A computer programme on its own or on any carrier may not be claimed as an invention, as this would be tantamount to authorising software patentability on the grounds that the software itself possesses patentable technical features, which cannot be the case.
A computer programme on its own or on any carrier may not be claimed as an invention, as this would be tantamount to authorising software patentability on the grounds that the software itself possesses patentable technical features, which cannot be the case.
Only claims for a computer controlled invention as a technical process or as a software-controlled device are therefore legitimate.
Only claims for a computer controlled invention as a technical process or as a software-controlled device are therefore legitimate.
This paragraph is similar to Article 7(1) adopted by Parliament at first reading.
This paragraph is similar to Article 7(1) adopted by Parliament at first reading.
Článok 5 odsek 2 a (nový)
Article 5, paragraph 2 a (new)
Tam, kde sú jednotlivé prvky programového vybavenia použité v kontexte, ktorý nezahrnuje realizáciu nejakého platne nárokovaného produktu alebo procesu, toto použitie nebude predstavovať porušenie patentu.
Where individual elements of software are used in contexts which do not involve the realisation of any validly claimed product or process, such use will not constitute patent infringement.
Only when software elements are used in the context of realising the computer-implemented invention the claims raised in accordance with point 1 extend to the software and infringements may take place.
Only when software elements are used in the context of realising the computer-implemented invention the claims raised in accordance with paragraph 1 extend to the software and infringements may take place.
This should not only be mentioned in Recital 17 but also in Article 5.
This should not only be mentioned in Recital 17 but also in Article 5.
Článok 5 odsek 2 b (nový)
Article 5, paragraph 2 b (new)
Členské štáty zabezpečia, aby boli licencie na využitie patentovaného vynálezu realizovaného na počítači dostupné za primeraných a nediskriminačných podmienok, pokiaľ je takéto využitie:
Member States shall ensure that licences are available to use a patented computer-implemented invention on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions when such use is
Verejný záujem sa bude uplatňovať v prípadoch, ktoré vylučujú články 81 a 82 Zmluvy.
The public interest shall be assumed in cases prohibited by Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty.
Primerané a nediskriminačné podmienky musia zohľadňovať predovšetkým:
Reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions shall in particular have regard to
a) náklady na získanie všetkých potrebných licencií od príslušných držiteľov práv na licencovaný výrobok, systém, sieť alebo službu,
(a) the cost of obtaining all necessary licenses from other relevant right holders for the licensed product, system, network or service,
b) bežné obchodné podmienky uplatňované pri tejto triede licencovaného výrobku, systému, siete alebo služby a
(b) the generally prevailing business conditions applicable to that class of licensed product, system, network or service, and
c) investície držiteľa patentu do výskumu a vývoja.
(c) the R&D investments by the patent holder.
Komisia sleduje dopad vynálezov realizovaných počítačom na inovácie a hospodársku súťaž v európskom i medzinárodnom meradle na podniky Spoločenstva , najmä malé a stredné podniky, na užívateľov softvéru s otvoreným zdrojovým kódom a na elektronický obchod.
The Commission shall monitor the impact of computer-implemented inventions on innovation and competition, both within Europe and internationally, on Community businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, on the open-source community and on electronic commerce.
Komisia sleduje dopad vynálezov realizovaných počítačom na inovácie a hospodársku súťaž v európskom i medzinárodnom meradle na európske podniky, najmä malé a stredné podniky, vrátane elektronického obchodu, najmä z hľadiska zamestnanosti v malých a stredných podnikoch.
The Commission shall monitor the impact of computer-implemented inventions on innovation and competition, both within Europe and internationally, on European businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, including electronic commerce , in particular from the aspect of employment in small and medium-sized enterprises .
Given that the European economy is founded very largely on a network of small and medium-sized enterprises, which derive a competitive advantage from the quality of their products, and that they could be harmed by implementation of the directive, it seems proper to monitor the possible adverse effects on the economic fabric and production systems of the Member States.
Given that the European economy is founded very largely on a network of small and medium-sized enterprises, which derive a competitive advantage from the quality of their products, and that they could be harmed by implementation of the directive, it seems proper to monitor the possible adverse effects on the economic fabric and production systems of the Member States.
Týmto sa zriaďuje Výbor pre technické inovácie v sektore malých a stredných podnikov, ďalej len „Výbor”, aby dozeral na dodržiavanie povinného sledovania uvedeného v článku 7.
To ensure compliance with the monitoring obligation imposed by Article 7 of this Directive, a committee on technological innovation in the small and medium-sized enterprise sector, hereinafter referred to as “the committee”, shall hereby be established.
Výbor najmä:
The committee shall in particular:
(a) skúma dopad patentov na vynálezy realizované počítačom na malé a stredné podniky a upozorňuje na všetky ťažkosti;
(a) examine the impact of patents for computer-implemented inventions on small and medium-sized enterprises and highlight any difficulties;
(b) sleduje účasť malých a stredných podnikov v patentovom systéme, najmä pokiaľ ide o vynálezy realizované počítačom, a posudzuje a odporúča každý právny predpis alebo iné iniciatívy na úrovni EU, ktoré sa k nemu vzťahujú a
(b) monitor participation of small and medium-sized enterprises in the patent system, with particular regard to patents for computer-implemented inventions, and consider and recommend any legislative or other European Union-level initiatives related thereto; and
(c) uľahčuje výmenu informácií, pokiaľ ide o rozvoj v oblasti patentov na vynálezy realizované počítačom, ktoré môžu mať vplyv na záujmy malých a stredných podnikov.
(c) facilitate the exchange of information with regard to relevant developments in the area of patents for computer-implemented inventions that might affect the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Komisia vykoná štúdiu realizovateľnosti ohľadom zriadenia Fondu pre malé a stredné podniky za účelom poskytovania technickej, finančnej a správnej podpory malým a stredným podnikom zaoberajúcim sa otázkami, ktoré sa vzťahujú k patentovateľnosti vynálezov realizovaných počítačom.
The Commission shall conduct a feasibility study into the establishment of a Fund for small and medium-sized enterprises to provide financial, technical and administrative support to small and medium-sized enterprises dealing with issues related to the patentability of computer-implemented inventions.
This amendment proposes that the European Commission studies the possibility of an ‘SME Fund’ to assist SMEs in fully participating in, and benefiting from, the computer-implemented invention patent regime.
This amendment proposes that the European Commission studies the possibility of an ‘SME Fund’ to assist SMEs in fully participating in, and benefiting from, the computer-implemented invention patent regime.
Článok 8 úvodná časť
Article 8, introductory sentence
Komisia podá Európskemu parlamentu a Rade do ...* správu:
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council by*...... on:
* 5 rokov odo dňa vstupu tejto smernice v platnosť.
* 5 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
* 3 rokov odo dňa vstupu tejto smernice v platnosť.
* 3 years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
It is necessary to set a clear deadline for the Commission report, but also for the first review of the Directive in accordance with Article 9.
It is necessary to set a clear deadline for the Commission report, but also for the first review of the Directive in accordance with Article 9.
The timeframe of 5 years should be split into two so that the Commission effectively reports to the European Parliament and the Council by three years and reviews the Directive by five years after entry into force.
The timeframe of 5 years should be split into two so that the Commission effectively reports to the European Parliament and the Council by three years and reviews the Directive by five years after entry into force.
Článok 8 bod aa) (nový)
Article 8, point (a a) (new)
( aa) účasti malých a stredných podnikov v patentovom systéme pre vynálezy realizované počítačom.
( aa) participation by small and medium-sized enterprises in the patent system for computer-implemented inventions.
Táto správa obsahuje údaje, v miere, v ktorej sú dostupné, týkajúce sa žiadateľov o patenty a príjemcov patentov na vynálezy realizované počítačom;
Such report shall include data, to the extent available, regarding applicants for and recipients of patents for computer-implemented inventions;
The above Pozmeňujúci a doplňujúci návrh would ensure that such data is compiled.
The above amendment would ensure that such data is compiled.
Článok 8 bod b)
Article 8, point (b)
b) o tom, či sú pravidlá, ktorými sa riadi doba platnosti patentu a stanovenie požiadaviek na patentovateľnosť, a konkrétnejšie novosť, vynálezcovská činnosť a vlastný rozsah patentových nárokov, primerané a či by s ohľadom na medzinárodné záväzky Spoločenstva bolo žiaduce a právne možné vykonať úpravy týchto pravidiel ;
(b) whether the rules governing the term of the patent and the determination of the patentability requirements, and more specifically novelty, inventive step and the proper scope of claims, are adequate , and whether it would be desirable and legally possible having regard to the Community’s international obligations to make modifications to such rules ;
b) o tom, či sú pravidlá, ktorými sa riadi doba platnosti patentu a stanovenie požiadaviek na patentovateľnosť, a konkrétnejšie novosť, vynálezcovská činnosť a vlastný rozsah patentových nárokov, primerané;
(b) whether the rules governing the term of the patent and the determination of the patentability requirements, and more specifically novelty, inventive step and the proper scope of claims, are adequate;
Last part of the common position text is not necessary.
Last part of the common position text is not necessary.
Článok 8 bod ga) (nový)
Article 8, point (g a) (new)
ga) vývoji vo výklade pojmov „technický prínos” a „vynálezcovská činnosť” patentových úradov a patentových súdov s ohľadom na budúci rozvoj techniky.
(ga) developments in the interpretation of the terms “technical contribution” and “inventive step” by patent offices and patent courts in the light of the future evolution of technology;
Parliament and the Council should be informed about the practice of granting patents under this Directive.
Parliament and the Council should be informed about the practice of granting patents under this Directive.
Special attention should be given to the interpretation of the most relevant legal definitions.
Special attention should be given to the interpretation of the most relevant legal definitions.
Článok 8 bod gb) (nový)
Article 8, point (g b) (new)
gb) či je možnosť opísaná v tejto smernici, týkajúca sa použitia vynálezu realizovaného počítačom za výlučným účelom zaistenia interoperability medzi dvoma systémami, primeraná;
(gb) whether the option outlined in this Directive concerning the use of a patented invention for the sole purpose of ensuring interoperability between two systems is adequate;
Člínok 8 bod gc) (nový)
Article 8, point (g c) new
(gc) o štúdii realizovateľnosti týkajúcej sa zriadenia Fondu pre malé a stredné podniky.
(gc) the feasibility study into the establishment of a Fund for small and medium-sized enterprises.
This Pozmeňujúci a doplňujúci návrh proposes that the European Commission studies the possibility of an ‘SME Fund’ to assist SMEs in fully participating in, and benefiting from, the computer-implemented invention patent regime.
This amendment proposes that the European Commission studies the possibility of an ‘SME Fund’ to assist SMEs in fully participating in, and benefiting from, the computer-implemented invention patent regime.
Článok 8 bod gd) (nový)
Article 8, point (g d) (new)
(gd) či došlo k stretnutiu s ťažkosťami vyplývajúcimi z udelenia patentov na vynálezy realizované počítačom, ktoré nevyhovujú zákonným požiadavkám na patentovateľnosť, pokiaľ ide o to, či vynález
(gd) whether difficulties have been experienced arising from the grant of patents for computer-implemented inventions which do not comply with the statutory requirements for patentability both in terms of whether the invention
(i) zahrňuje vynálezcovskú činnosť a
(i) involves an inventive step and
(ii) vytvára technický prínos
(ii) makes a technical contribution
v súlade s čl. 4 ods. 1 a ako taký nemal byť zákonne udelený.
in accordance with Article 4(1), and as such should not legitimately have been granted.
This amendment addresses the concerns that have been expressed about the grant of trivial, or undeserving, patents.
This amendment addresses the concerns that have been expressed about the grant of trivial, or undeserving, patents.
It provides a new initiative for the Commission to report to the European Parliament and the Council on whether difficulties have been found in practice caused by patents that should not have legitimately been granted.
It provides a new initiative for the Commission to report to the European Parliament and the Council on whether difficulties have been found in practice caused by patents that should not have legitimately been granted.
This will encourage the European Patent Office and national Patent Offices to maintain the highest standards for examining patent applications, thus minimising the risk of undeserving patents being granted.
This will encourage the European Patent Office and national Patent Offices to maintain the highest standards for examining patent applications, thus minimising the risk of undeserving patents being granted.
Článok 8 bod (g e) (nový)
Article 8, point (g e) (new)
(ge) či táto smernica mala požadované účinky, pokiaľ ide o harmonizáciu a vyjasnenie právnych ustanovení, ktorými sa riadi patentovateľnosť vynálezov realizovaných počítačom.
(ge) whether this Directive has produced the desired effects in terms of harmonisation and clarification of the legal rules governing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions;
To provide an assessment whether the aims leading to the adoption of this Directive have been achieved.
To provide an assessment whether the aims leading to the adoption of this Directive have been achieved.
Článok 8 bod (gf) (nový)
Article 8, point (g f) (new)
(gf) rozvoji celosvetových patentových systémov v oblasti vynálezov realizovaných počítačom, pokiaľ ide o aspekty uvedené v písm. a) až d) a f) až g b)).
(gf) the developments of the world-wide patent systems in the area of computer-implemented inventions in terms of the aspects mentioned in points (a) to (d) and (f) to (gb).
The evolution of the patent systems in other major jurisdictions, especially the possibility to have a world-wide patent system, should be closely monitored.
The evolution of the patent systems in other major jurisdictions, especially the possibility to have a world-wide patent system, should be closely monitored.
Komisia do jedného roku predloží návrh na účinný Európsky patent Spoločenstva, ktorý ustanovuje demokratickú kontrolu Európskeho parlamentu nad Európskym patentovým úradom a Európskym patentovým dohovorom.
The Commission shall come forward within a year with a proposal for an effective European Community patent which provides for democratic control by the European Parliament over the European Patent Office and the European Patent Convention.
With a view to legal certainty and reaching the Lisbon objectives it is desirable that there is one single patent system across the European Union.
With a view to legal certainty and reaching the Lisbon objectives it is desirable that there is one single patent system across the European Union.
Členské štáty zaisťujú, aby ich zástupcovia v Správnej rade Európskej patentovej organizácie prijali také opatrenia, ktoré sú v ich právomoci, aby sa zaistilo, že Európsky patentový úrad udeľuje európske patenty iba v prípade, že boli splnené požiadavky Európskeho patentového dohovoru, najmä pokiaľ ide o vynálezcovskú činnosť a technický prínos, ako je definované v čl. 2 písm. b).
Member States shall ensure that their representatives in the a dministrative c ouncil of the European Patent Organisation take such measures as are within their authority to ensure that the European Patent Office only grants European patents when the requirements of the European Patent Convention have been met, in particular with respect to inventive step and technical contribution as defined in point (b) of Article 2 .
Rada poskytuje Európskemu parlamentu každoročnú správu o činnostiach zástupcov členských štátov, ktoré sú zmluvnými štátmi Európskeho patentového dohovoru v Správnej rade Európskej patentovej organizácie, a o pokroku, ku ktorému došlo pri dosahovaní cieľov uvedených v odseku 1.
The Council sh all provide a yearly report to the European Parliament on the activities of representatives of Member States that are Contracting States to the European Patent Convention in the a dministrative c ouncil of the European Patent Organisation , and the progress that has been made in achieving the objectives set out in paragraph 1 .
This amendment recognises that the Member States are also Contracting States of the European Patent Convention and that Member States have some influence the practice of the European Patent Office, specifically with respect to maintaining high standards of examining patent applications in particular with respect to inventive step and ‘technical contribution’ as defined in this directive.
This amendment recognises that the Member States are also Contracting States of the European Patent Convention and that Member States have some influence the practice of the European Patent Office, specifically with respect to maintaining high standards of examining patent applications in particular with respect to inventive step and ‘technical contribution’ as defined in this directive.
Furthermore, this amendment requires Member States (in Council) to report to the European Parliament each year on what they have actually done to influence the EPO in this regard and on the progress that has been made towards the goal of minimising the grant of undeserving patents.
Furthermore, this amendment requires Member States (in Council) to report to the European Parliament each year on what they have actually done to influence the EPO in this regard and on the progress that has been made towards the goal of minimising the grant of undeserving patents.
C’est là l’objet de l’Pozmenujúci a doplňujúci návrh fondamental, qui reprend d’ailleurs partiellement mais en l’améliorant, la formulation retenue par le Parlement en premiere lecture.
This was the purpose of the basic amendment, which partially takes up and improves the wording adopted by Parliament at first reading.
Toute définition étant toujours aussi importante par ce qu’elle définit que par ce à quoi elle s’oppose, il a semblé essentiel à votre rapporteur d’ajouter dans ce paragraphe 2c) un deuxième alinéa lui aussi incorporé à l’Pozmenujúci a doplňujúci návrh 5, destiné à confirmer en toute clarté ce que la définition proposée au premier alinéa exclut du champ de la technique, donc de la brevetabilité : « Le traitement, la manipulation, la représentation et la présentation de l’information par un programme informatique ne sont pas techniques, même lorsque des moyens techniques sont employés dans ce but ».
Given that what a definition excludes is as important as what it defines, your rapporteur felt it vital to include in paragraph 2(c) a second subparagraph (also included in Amendment 5) designed to make it clear that the definition given in the first paragraph covers the non-technical nature of certain aspects and therefore their non-patentability: ‘The processing, handling, representation and presentation of data by a computer program are not technical, even if technical devices are used for this purpose’.
Ils sont, en totalité pour ceux qui concernent les Odôvodnenies, et pour la plupart de ceux qui concernent le dispositif, des rectifications ou des précisions de vocabulaire.
In every case for the recitals and in most cases for the operative text, the amendments are corrections or improvements to the wording.
Enfin l’Pozmenujúci a doplňujúci návrh 14 tire la conséquence de la définition retenue en ce qui concerne l’intéropérabilité, qu’il est essentiel de préserver, mais qui ne concerne plus les logiciels puisqu’ils sont confirmés comme étant hors champ de la brevetabilité.
Finally, Amendment 14 is a necessary consequence of the definition adopted for interoperability, which needs to be maintained, although it no longer covers software, which, as has been confirmed, is not patentable.
Spoločná pozícia prijatá Radou na účely prijatia smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o patentovateľnosti vynálezov realizovaných počítačmi
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
čl. 251 ods..
Legal basis
2 a čl. 95 ES
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
Dátum prvého čítania v EP – P5
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P[5]
Dátum oznámenia prijatia spoločnej pozície na rokovaní
Date receipt of common position announced in plenary commune
o žiadosti o ochranu výsad a imunít Jeana-Charlesa Marchianiho
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Jean-Charles Marchiani
– so zreteľom na žiadosť o ochranu svojej imunity, ktorú podal Jean-Charles Marchiani 19. mája 2005 a ktorá bola oznámená na plenárnej schôdzi 26. mája 2005,
– having regard to the request by Jean-Charles Marchiani for defence of his immunity of 19 May 2005, announced in plenary sitting on 26 May 2005,
– so zreteľom na články 9 a 10 Protokolu o výsadách a imunitách Európskych spoločenstiev z 8. apríla 1965 ako aj na článok 6 odsek 2 Aktu o voľbe poslancov Európskeho parlamentu všeobecným priamym hlasovaním z 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– so zreteľom na rozsudky Súdneho dvora Európskych spoločenstiev z 12. mája 1964 a 10. júla 1986
– having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
– so zreteľom na správu Výboru pre právne veci (A6‑0000/2005),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0208/2005 ),
A. keďže pán Jean-Charles Marchiani bol zvolený do Európskeho parlamentu v piatych priamych voľbách 13. júna 1999, Parlament overil jeho osvedčenie o zvolení za poslanca dňa 15. decembra 1999
A. whereas Jean-Charles Marchiani was elected to the European Parliament at the fifth direct elections on 13 June 1999, his credentials were verified by Parliament on 15 December 1999
93). a jeho funkčné obdobie sa skončilo 19. júla 2004,
93). and his term of office ended on 19 July 2004,
B. keďže francúzske justičné orgány v období, keď bol poslancom Európskeho parlamentu, zachytili viacero telefonických rozhovorov medzi pánom Marchianim a ďalšími osobami;
B. whereas, during the period in which he was a member of the European Parliament, the French judicial authorities intercepted various telephone conversations between Jean-Charles Marchiani and others;