natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
26. considers that now is the appropriate time to start reflecting on the basis for funding the EU budget in the long term, and to reinforce democratic control of the budget through the European Parliament;
26. considers that now is the appropriate time to start reflecting on the basis for funding the EU budget in the long term, and to reinforce democratic control of the budget through the European Parliament;
27. reminds Member States that cohesion policy is an area where the EU has long demonstrated its real added value, whose visibility enables citizens to appreciate daily the EU’s practical and positive work, and which represents the basis of European solidarity and thus distinguishes the European social model from other examples of transnational integration;
27. reminds Member States that cohesion policy is an area where the EU has long demonstrated its real added value, whose visibility enables citizens to appreciate daily the EU’s practical and positive work, and which represents the basis of European solidarity and thus distinguishes the European social model from other examples of transnational integration;
28. reiterates its support for the Partnership for Growth and Jobs (Lisbon Strategy) as a balanced approach between the economic goals, sustainable development and the modernisation and advancement of Europe’s social model;
28. reiterates its support for the Partnership for Growth and Jobs (Lisbon Strategy) as a balanced approach between the economic goals, sustainable development and the modernisation and advancement of Europe’s social model;
29. believes that strengthening the EU's competitiveness also requires helping Europe's citizens to develop their talents and creativity beyond national borders; furthermore, believes that the value of a culturally diverse Union will become much more tangible to Europeans when they begin to experience life in a European context; therefore, in order to strengthen competitiveness and to connect citizens with the European project, stresses the need for the EU to continue facilitating free movement of people and to promoting greater mobility within the Union;
29. believes that strengthening the EU's competitiveness also requires helping Europe's citizens to develop their talents and creativity beyond national borders; furthermore, believes that the value of a culturally diverse Union will become much more tangible to Europeans when they begin to experience life in a European context; therefore, in order to strengthen competitiveness and to connect citizens with the European project, stresses the need for the EU to continue facilitating free movement of people and to promoting greater mobility within the Union;
30. endorses its support for the EU strategy on sustainable development and stresses in particular that Community actions and funding for improving the environment should have powerful effects at the national, regional and local levels;
30. endorses its support for the EU strategy on sustainable development and stresses in particular that Community actions and funding for improving the environment should have powerful effects at the national, regional and local levels;
31. recalls the unique character of European citizenship, as an element of identity, which does not replace national citizenship;
31. recalls the unique character of European citizenship, as an element of identity, which does not replace national citizenship;
32. calls for much greater investment and collaboration in education (including life-long learning opportunities for all citizens), research and innovation at European and national level as the best means to create more and better jobs for Europe's citizens and to strengthen Europe's competitiveness in the global economy;
32. calls for much greater investment and collaboration in education (including life-long learning opportunities for all citizens), research and innovation at European and national level as the best means to create more and better jobs for Europe's citizens and to strengthen Europe's competitiveness in the global economy;
33. is convinced that to better explain Europe and its policies, national, regional and local authorities should implement educational efforts, for example via the introduction of special courses in schools, European dimension in the school curricula, post-school education and training for teachers;
33. is convinced that to better explain Europe and its policies, national, regional and local authorities should implement educational efforts, for example via the introduction of special courses in schools, European dimension in the school curricula, post-school education and training for teachers;
34. is , moreover, convinced that a positive European culture must be disseminated among regional and local public officials, who in their daily work must deal with regulations;
34. is , moreover, convinced that a positive European culture must be disseminated among regional and local public officials, who in their daily work must deal with regulations;
35. invites the EU institutions and the Member States to listen to the citizens in order to evaluate the results of the debate during the period of reflection;
35. invites the EU institutions and the Member States to listen to the citizens in order to evaluate the results of the debate during the period of reflection;
36. is conscious that during the period of reflection various different scenarios are likely to be discussed, but is against abandoning this Constitutional Treaty in favour of the Nice Treaty, and calls for a consensual approach towards ratification by 2009;
36. is conscious that during the period of reflection various different scenarios are likely to be discussed, but is against abandoning this Constitutional Treaty in favour of the Nice Treaty, and calls for a consensual approach towards ratification by 2009;
37. wishes to actively participate in the relaunching of the constitutional process and offers to the European Parliament support for its efforts to secure a successful outcome.
37. wishes to actively participate in the relaunching of the constitutional process and offers to the European Parliament support for its efforts to secure a successful outcome.
Brussels, 13 October 2005
Brussels, 13 October 2005
The President of the Committee of the Regions Peter Straub
The President of the Committee of the Regions Peter Straub
The Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions Gerhard Stahl
The Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions Gerhard Stahl
N.B.: Appendix overleaf.
N.B.: Appendix overleaf.
Proposed CoR roadmap for a decentralised debate during the period of reflection
Proposed CoR roadmap for a decentralised debate during the period of reflection
Starting points
Starting points
• The period of reflection should be an active and dynamic phase of the dialogue process, with European institutions reaching out to the public in order to launch a structured, decentralised and high-quality debate on Europe, focusing on the issues which are most relevant to ordinary Europeans.
• The period of reflection should be an active and dynamic phase of the dialogue process, with European institutions reaching out to the public in order to launch a structured, decentralised and high-quality debate on Europe, focusing on the issues which are most relevant to ordinary Europeans.
• The debate should focus on governance rather than on the ratification mechanism; in view of the need to act at a level as close as possible to ordinary citizens, it should be conducted in European local authorities and regions rather than in Brussels, and the subject of the debate should be the purpose and added value of the EU, its fundamental values and policies, rather than the Constitutional Treaty.
• The debate should focus on governance rather than on the ratification mechanism; in view of the need to act at a level as close as possible to ordinary citizens, it should be conducted in European local authorities and regions rather than in Brussels, and the subject of the debate should be the purpose and added value of the EU, its fundamental values and policies, rather than the Constitutional Treaty.
• Local and regional assemblies and executive bodies should become actively involved at an institutional level, and should participate fully in the debate on the future of the EU, while shouldering their responsibilities vis-à-vis the public.
• Local and regional assemblies and executive bodies should become actively involved at an institutional level, and should participate fully in the debate on the future of the EU, while shouldering their responsibilities vis-à-vis the public.
• Possible subjects for the debate: the role and importance of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter included in the Constitutional Treaty, the European social model, solidarity, subsidiarity and proportionality, the single market, competitiveness, growth and employment, the environment, sustainable development, energy policy, public services and how to fund them, economic aspects of economic and monetary union, the challenges of globalisation for SMEs, rights and freedoms and the sense of belonging linked to European citizenship, the area of security, freedom and justice, enlargement versus closer integration, policies on education, research and innovation.
• Possible subjects for the debate: the role and importance of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter included in the Constitutional Treaty, the European social model, solidarity, subsidiarity and proportionality, the single market, competitiveness, growth and employment, the environment, sustainable development, energy policy, public services and how to fund them, economic aspects of economic and monetary union, the challenges of globalisation for SMEs, rights and freedoms and the sense of belonging linked to European citizenship, the area of security, freedom and justice, enlargement versus closer integration, policies on education, research and innovation.
Moreover, the topics covered should be adapted to particular circumstances identified at local and regional levels.
Moreover, the topics covered should be adapted to particular circumstances identified at local and regional levels.
• The CoR is keen to play a proactive role, in partnership with the European Parliament; MEPs and local and regional elected representatives will have to join forces to contribute to the political and democratic debate during the period of reflection.
• The CoR is keen to play a proactive role, in partnership with the European Parliament; MEPs and local and regional elected representatives will have to join forces to contribute to the political and democratic debate during the period of reflection.
• To enable effective and appropriate implementation of the proposed measures, the CoR would like to obtain additional funding; a new budget heading could even be introduced for this purpose from 2006 onwards.
• To enable effective and appropriate implementation of the proposed measures, the CoR would like to obtain additional funding; a new budget heading could even be introduced for this purpose from 2006 onwards.
Measures envisaged for 2006-2009
Measures envisaged for 2006-2009
• European Forums could be set up simultaneously in all the Member States to facilitate open exchange and discussion on Europe, its values, objectives and frontiers:
• European Forums could be set up simultaneously in all the Member States to facilitate open exchange and discussion on Europe, its values, objectives and frontiers:
– 1st phase (October 2005 – March 2006): establishment of regional committees comprising "ambassadors" from local and regional authorities and representing the network of CoR members, political parties, members of regional and national parliaments, the local and regional media, civil society as well as social and educational players; these would serve to raise public awareness, particularly among young people, and to raise the profile of European policies.
– 1st phase (October 2005 – March 2006): establishment of regional committees comprising "ambassadors" from local and regional authorities and representing the network of CoR members, political parties, members of regional and national parliaments, the local and regional media, civil society as well as social and educational players; these would serve to raise public awareness, particularly among young people, and to raise the profile of European policies.
– 2nd phase (from January 2006 – June 2009): holding public meetings in European cities and regions, with the participation of CoR members and MEPs, to discuss problems which have been identified:
– 2nd phase (from January 2006 – June 2009): holding public meetings in European cities and regions, with the participation of CoR members and MEPs, to discuss problems which have been identified:
• to identify target groups: local and regional administration, journalists, teachers, young people, etc.;
• to identify target groups: local and regional administration, journalists, teachers, young people, etc.;
• in cooperation with the European Parliament and with the assistance of the media, to identify problems which ordinary Europeans feel to be particularly relevant, by listening to the problems and fears expressed by them at public meetings;
• in cooperation with the European Parliament and with the assistance of the media, to identify problems which ordinary Europeans feel to be particularly relevant, by listening to the problems and fears expressed by them at public meetings;
• to prepare a range of communication tools for CoR members to use;
• to prepare a range of communication tools for CoR members to use;
• to communicate with local and national media;
• to communicate with local and national media;
• to use online forums for debate and create virtual regional forums;
• to use online forums for debate and create virtual regional forums;
• to publish information documents.
• to publish information documents.
– 3rd phase (from January 2007): to evaluate and consolidate the results of the debate conducted in the cities and regions of Europe.
– 3rd phase (from January 2007): to evaluate and consolidate the results of the debate conducted in the cities and regions of Europe.
• To hold annual conferences in Brussels for the local and regional media; these would be organised by the CoR in cooperation with other European institutions, with financial support from the European Commission.
• To hold annual conferences in Brussels for the local and regional media; these would be organised by the CoR in cooperation with other European institutions, with financial support from the European Commission.
The first of these would be held in 2006.
The first of these would be held in 2006.
• The CoR's Press & Communications Unit could collaborate with local and regional representation offices in Brussels in drawing up a study on information activity; and links with the local and regional media.
• The CoR's Press & Communications Unit could collaborate with local and regional representation offices in Brussels in drawing up a study on information activity; and links with the local and regional media.
This subject could be chosen as the central theme of the CoR's Open Days in 2006.
This subject could be chosen as the central theme of the CoR's Open Days in 2006.
• To draft a targeted brochure on the added value of Community action and its relevance to ordinary Europeans; this brochure could be presented by CoR members and widely distributed.
• To draft a targeted brochure on the added value of Community action and its relevance to ordinary Europeans; this brochure could be presented by CoR members and widely distributed.
The brochure would be based on new ideas presented in an easy-to-understand, informative way so as to arouse public interest.
The brochure would be based on new ideas presented in an easy-to-understand, informative way so as to arouse public interest.
• To launch a public awareness-raising strategy targeted at young people in particular as the European citizens of the future who will be voting for the first time in 2009.
• To launch a public awareness-raising strategy targeted at young people in particular as the European citizens of the future who will be voting for the first time in 2009.
Obdobie reflexie: štruktúra, témy a kontext hodnotenia diskusie o Európskej únii
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
všetky 7.7.2005
All 7.7.2005
Spravodajcovia dátum vymenovania
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
o spoločnom texte smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o riadení kvality vody určenej na kúpanie, a ktorou sa zrušuje Smernica 76/160/EHS, ktorý bol schválený Zmierovacím výborom
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC
Delegácia Európskeho parlamentu pre Zmierovací výbor
European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee
Predseda delegácie:
Delegation chairman:
DÔVODOVÁ SPRÁVA.............................................................................................................3
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................5
(Spolurozhodovací postup: tretie čítanie)
(Codecision procedure: third reading)
– so zreteľom na spoločný text schválený Zmierovacím výborom (PE-CONS 3659/2005 – C6‑0373/2005 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3659/2005 – C6‑0373/2005 ),
EÚ C 45 E, 25.2.2003, s.
OJ C 45 E, 25.2.2003, p.
– so zreteľom na zmenený a doplnený návrh Komisie ( KOM(2004)0245 )
– having regard to the amended proposal ( COM(2004)0245 )
– so zreteľom na vlastný pozíciu v druhom čítaní
– having regard to its position at second reading
EÚ C 111 E, 11.5.2005, s.
OJ C 111 E, 11.5.2005, p.
– so zreteľom na pozíciu Komisie k pozmeňujúcim a doplňujúcim návrhom Parlamentu, týkajúcim sa spoločnej pozície ( KOM(2005)0277
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2005)0277 )
– so zreteľom na článok 251 ods. 5 Zmluvy o ES
– having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,
– so zreteľom na článok 65 rokovacieho poriadku,
– having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,
– so zreteľom na správu delegácie Parlamentu, predloženú Zmierovacím výborom ( A6‑0415/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0415/2005 ),
Spoločný text smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o riadení kvality vody určenej na kúpanie, a ktorou sa zrušuje Smernica 76/160/EHS, ktorý bol schválený Zmierovacím výborom
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC
článok 251 ods. 5 a článok 175 ods. 1 Zmluvy od ES
Articles 251(5) and 175(1) EC
článok 65
Rule 65
Predseda delegácie: podpredseda
Delegation chair( wo )man: Vice-President
Predseda gestorského výboru
Chair( wo )man of committee responsible
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the quality of bathing water – COM(2002)0581 – C5-0508/2002
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the quality of bathing water – COM(2002)0581 – C5-0508/2002
Spoločná pozícia Rady dátum oznámenia v pléne
Council common position Date announced in plenary
Dátum druhého čítania v Parlamente P[5]
Date of Parliament’s 2nd reading – P[5]
Dátum doručenia druhého čítania Rade
Date Council received 2nd reading
Dátum zamietnutia pozmeňujúcich a doplňujúcich návrhov Parlamentu Radou
Date of Council letter on non-approval of Parliament amendments
Schôdza zmierovacieho výboru
Conciliation Committee meetings
Dátum hlasovania delegácie Parlamentu
Date of vote by Parliament delegation
Výsledok hlasovania:
Result of vote
Poslanci prítomní na hlasovaní
Members present
Náhradníci prítomní na hlasovaní
Substitutes present
Náhradníci (čl. 178 ods. 2) prítomní na hlasovaní
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present
Dátum dohody v zmierovacom výbore
Date of agreement in Conciliation Committee
Dátum, kedy spolupredsedovia potvrdili, že spoločný text bol schválený a postúpili ho Parlamentu a Rade
Date on which the co-chairmen established that the joint text had been approved and forwarded it to Parliament and the Council
PREDĹŽENIE KONEČNÝCH TERMÍNOV
EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Predĺženie konečného termínu na druhé čítanie Radou
Extension of deadline for second reading by Council
Predĺženie konečného termínu na zvolanie výboru
Extension of deadline for convening the Committee
vyžiadané inštitúciou - dátum
Requesting institution – date
Predĺženie konečného termínu na činnosť vo výbore
Extension of deadline for work in the Committee
Predĺženie konečného termínu na schválenie aktu
Extension of deadline for adopting the act
o spoločnom texte prijatom zmierovacím výborom vzhľadom na prijatie smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o nakladaní s odpadom z ťažobného priemyslu a ktorou sa mení a dopĺňa smernica 2004/35/ES
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from the extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC
Delegácia Európskeho parlamentu v zmierovacom výbore
European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee
Predsedníčka delegácie:
Delegation chairwoman:
(spolurozhodovací postup: tretie čítanie)
(Codecision procedure: third reading)
– so zreteľom na spoločný text schválený zmierovacím výborom a príslušné medziinštitucionálne vyhlásenie (PE-CONS 3665/2005 – C6‑0405/2005 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the relevant interinstitutional statement (PE-CONS 3665/2005 – C6‑0405/2005 ),
– so zreteľom na spoločné vyhlásenie Bulharska a Rumunska o uplatňovaní tejto smernice
- having regard to the joint declaration by Bulgaria and Romania on implementation of the Directive,
Priložené k spoločnému textu. ,
Annexed to the joint text.
– so zreteľom na svoju pozíciu v druhom čítaní
– having regard to its position at second reading
– so zreteľom na stanovisko Komisie k pozmeňujúcim a doplňujúcim návrhom Parlamentu týkajúcim sa spoločnej pozície ( KOM(2005)0477 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2005)0477 )
– so zreteľom na článok 251 ods. 5 Zmluvy o ES,
– having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,
– so zreteľom na správu delegácie Parlamentu v zmierovacom výbore ( A6‑0001/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0001/2006 ),
2. poveruje svojho predsedu, aby podpísal akt spoločne s predsedom Rady podľa článku 254 ods. 1 Zmluvy o ES;
Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;
Spoločný text prijatý zmierovacím výborom vzhľadom na prijatie smernice Európskeho parlamentu a Rady o nakladaní s odpadom z ťažobného priemyslu a ktorou sa mení a dopĺňa smernica 2004/35/ES
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the management of waste from the extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC
PE-CONS 3665/2005– C6-0405/2005 – 2003/0107(COD)
PE-CONS 3665/2005 – C6-0405/2005 – 2003/0107(COD)
Článok 251 ods. 5 a článok 175 Zmluvy o ES
Articles 251(5) and 175 EC
Článok 65
Rule 65
Predsedníčka delegácie: podpredsedníčka
Delegation chairwoman: Vice-President
Predseda gestorského výboru
Chairman of committee responsible
Zmenený návrh Komisie
Commission proposal
Dátum prvého čítania v Parlamente – Číslo P
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P[5]
Spoločná pozícia Rady dátum oznámenia na schôdzi
Council common position Date announced in plenary
Pozícia Komisie (Článok 251 ods. 2 druhý pododsek tretia zarážka)
Commission position (Article 251(2), subpara 2, indent 3)
Dátum druhého čítania v Parlamente – Číslo P
Date of Parliament’s 2nd reading – P[5]
Stanovisko Komisie (Článok 251 ods.2 tretí pododsek bod c))
Commission opinion (Article 251(2), subpara 3, point (c))