natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The increasingly open and international nature of agricultural markets will have a major structural impact on the farming industry and rural development in the European Union.
The increasingly open and international nature of agricultural markets will have a major structural impact on the farming industry and rural development in the European Union.
Against this background, measures to protect, maintain the competitiveness of and strengthen on a sustainable basis the economic potential of rural areas must be a key Community objective in the context of the Lisbon Strategy.
Against this background, measures to protect, maintain the competitiveness of and strengthen on a sustainable basis the economic potential of rural areas must be a key Community objective in the context of the Lisbon Strategy.
Through the reform of the CAP, the EU has taken an important step in the right direction.
Through the reform of the CAP, the EU has taken an important step in the right direction.
The reform will substantially improve the market integration of the farming industry.
The reform will substantially improve the market integration of the farming industry.
This will open up new opportunities for development, but these opportunities will bring with them risks for holdings and markets which fail to adjust quickly enough.
This will open up new opportunities for development, but these opportunities will bring with them risks for holdings and markets which fail to adjust quickly enough.
At the same time, society is making ever greater demands on agriculture and food production.
At the same time, society is making ever greater demands on agriculture and food production.
Parliament had to fight for a long time to secure codecision rights in the agricultural sphere.
Parliament had to fight for a long time to secure codecision rights in the agricultural sphere.
It is welcome that the draft Constitution should have taken over the provisions, in force since the Amsterdam Treaty was ratified, stipulating that codecision applies in the areas of environmental protection, food safety and consumer protection.
It is welcome that the draft Constitution should have taken over the provisions, in force since the Amsterdam Treaty was ratified, stipulating that codecision applies in the areas of environmental protection, food safety and consumer protection.
Even today, the Council of Agriculture Ministers can disregard Parliament's opinion on agricultural policy matters.
Even today, the Council of Agriculture Ministers can disregard Parliament's opinion on agricultural policy matters.
Against this background, although the draft Constitution offered the prospect of increased democratic legitimacy, in that all fundamental farm-policy decisions were to be subject to codecision, on many market-related, and therefore vital, issues it would have represented a backward step by comparison with the current situation - the Council was to take decisions on those issues with no Parliament involvement.
Against this background, although the draft Constitution offered the prospect of increased democratic legitimacy, in that all fundamental farm-policy decisions were to be subject to codecision, on many market-related, and therefore vital, issues it would have represented a backward step by comparison with the current situation - the Council was to take decisions on those issues with no Parliament involvement.
The Common Agricultural Policy is a cornerstone of the European integration process.
The Common Agricultural Policy is a cornerstone of the European integration process.
In view of the CAP's great significance, and given the huge share of EU budgetary spending for which it accounts, European citizens must be offered guarantees of the highest possible degree of transparency and consensual decision-making in this sensitive area.
In view of the CAP's great significance, and given the huge share of EU budgetary spending for which it accounts, European citizens must be offered guarantees of the highest possible degree of transparency and consensual decision-making in this sensitive area.
Full codecision on all issues relating to agricultural policy, consumer protection and food safety must be therefore be seen as fundamental to any future European institutional structure.
Full codecision on all issues relating to agricultural policy, consumer protection and food safety must be therefore be seen as fundamental to any future European institutional structure.
This will also necessitate a fundamental redrawing of the objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy, however: Part III, Article III-123 is outdated and no longer serves a readily explainable purpose.
This will also necessitate a fundamental redrawing of the objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy, however: Part III, Article III-123 is outdated and no longer serves a readily explainable purpose.
Today, the EU farming industry provides employment for 10 million people.
Today, the EU farming industry provides employment for 10 million people.
It represents the only guarantee for sustainable rural development and is part of the fabric of rural life.
It represents the only guarantee for sustainable rural development and is part of the fabric of rural life.
Today, the CAP stands for the market-oriented, environmentally-friendly, low-resource-impact and socially-sustainable production of high-quality foodstuffs in accordance with internationally fair conditions.
Today, the CAP stands for the market-oriented, environmentally-friendly, low-resource-impact and socially-sustainable production of high-quality foodstuffs in accordance with internationally fair conditions.
The CAP takes account of animal protection requirements and takes measures to prevent animal disease epidemics.
The CAP takes account of animal protection requirements and takes measures to prevent animal disease epidemics.
Your draftsman takes the view that the draft Constitution in its current form will not produce a CAP which is acceptable to society.
Your draftsman takes the view that the draft Constitution in its current form will not produce a CAP which is acceptable to society.
Instead, as the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has already urged in its opinion on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Parliament should do everything in its power to make the public understand the significance of the Common Agricultural Policy, the advances it has brought about and the benefits it offers consumers.
Instead, as the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has already urged in its opinion on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, Parliament should do everything in its power to make the public understand the significance of the Common Agricultural Policy, the advances it has brought about and the benefits it offers consumers.
Výbor pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka žiada Výbor pre ústavné veci, aby ako gestorský výbor prijal do svojho návrhu uznesenia tieto návrhy:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development asks the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. vyjadruje poľutovanie nad tým, že o záležitostiach, ktoré doteraz podliehali konzultácii, sa môže odteraz rozhodovať bez účasti Parlamentu; považuje to za kontraproduktívne vzhľadom na pochybnosti veľkej časti európskeho obyvateľstva o Zmluve o Ústave pre Európu, ako aj so zreteľom na nevyhnutnosť odstránenia deficitu demokracie;
Regrets the fact that decisions can now be taken without Parliament's involvement on matters previously covered by the consultation procedure; regards this as counterproductive in the light of the doubts voiced by broad sections of the European public concerning the draft Constitution and the calls for a reduction in the democratic deficit;
„Cieľom Spoločnej poľnohospodárskej politiky je:
'The objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy are:
(a) podporovať v Európskej únii multifunkčné poľnohospodárske odvetvie, ktoré berie ohľad na životné prostredie, požiadavky na ochranu zvierat a krajinu, zachováva biologickú rozmanitosť a odmieňa poľnohospodárov za ich prínos k plneniu týchto cieľov;
(a) to support the development in the European Union of a multifunctional agricultural sector which is respectful of the environment, animal protection requirements and the landscape, which fosters biological diversity and which rewards farmers for their contribution to these aims,
(b) zvyšovať produktivitu poľnohospodárstva podporovaním a zodpovedným využívaním technického pokroku, racionalizáciou poľnohospodárskej výroby reálnym využívaním výrobných faktorov;
(b) to increase agricultural productivity by means of the promotion and responsible exploitation of technological progress, the rationalisation of farm production methods and effective use of production factors,
(c) poskytnúť obyvateľstvu vidieka dlhodobé vyhliadky, najmä prostredníctvom politiky rozvoja vidieka, rovnakých podmienok pre ich výrobky na trhu EÚ a zabezpečovaním a vytváraním pracovných príležitostí vo vidieckych oblastiach;
(c) offer the rural population long-term prospects, in particular by means of rural development policy measures , a level playing field for their products on the EU markets and measures to safeguard and create jobs in rural areas,
(d) stabilizovať trhy a zabezpečovať zásobovanie obyvateľstva kvalitatívne hodnotnými a bezpečnými potravinami, vyrobenými podľa primeraných noriem, pokiaľ ide o starostlivosť o zvieratá, životné prostredie a prácu,
(d) stabilise markets, guarantee that the public is supplied with high-quality and safe foodstuffs, which are produced under reasonable standards as regards animal welfare, the environment and labour,
6. zastáva názor, že tieto ciele by mali byť v každom prípade súčasťou prípadne skrátenej Zmluvy o Ústave, ktorá by sa obmedzovala na definovanie cieľov, rozdelenie úloh a hlavné rozhodovacie postupy EÚ, zatiaľ čo podrobnejšie ustanovenia môžu byť uvedené v samostatnej zmluve;
Considers that these objectives should, in any case, be contained in a possibly abridged Constitutional Treaty limited to defining the objectives, division of tasks and major EU decision-making procedures, while more detailed provisions may be contained in a separate treaty;
Obdobie zvažovania: štruktúra, témy a rámec hodnotenia diskusie o Európskej únii
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
dátum oznámenia v pléne
D a te announced in plenary
Prerokovanie vo výbore
Enhanced cooperation
čas na zamyslenie: štruktúra, témy a rámec hodnotenia rozpravy o Európskej únii
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Výbor pre kultúru a vzdelávanie žiada Výbor pre ústavné veci, aby ako gestorský výbor prijal do svojho návrhu uznesenia tieto návrhy:
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. žiada, aby sa zorganizovala diskusia o budúcnosti Európskej únie z pohľadu medzinárodnej geostratégie, tak aby táto diskusia umožnila presnejšie vymedziť Európu, ktorú by si občania želali budovať v budúcnosti;
Calls for a debate on the future of the European Union from the international geostrategic point of view, in so far as such a debate can provide a better approach for deciding what kind of Europe its citizens want for the future;
4. domnieva sa, že členské štáty, regióny a obce musia, na základe svojej blízkosti k občanom, prispieť k diskusii o budúcnosti Únie a prispieť k tomu, aby Európska únia bola spôsobilá účinnejšie a konkrétnejšie riešiť problémy občanov ;
Considers that the Member States, regions and local authorities must contribute to the debate on the Union’s future, because of their greater closeness to the public, and do their part to ensure that the European Union is more efficient and effective in solving its citizens’ problems;
prijaté texty, P5_TA(2005)0368 ;
Texts adopted , P6_TA(2005)0183 . ;
8. konštatuje, že diskusia o Ústavnej zmluve je takisto diskusiou o európskej rozmanitosti a identite; domnieva sa, že kultúrne a vzdelávacie programy realizované Úniou sú podstatným príspevkom pre posilnenie európskeho povedomia ako aj pre zachovanie a ďalší rozvoj európskych kultúr; pripomína význam prispôsobeného rozpočtu pre kultúru a vzdelávanie, a síce aj v rámci finančného výhľadu;
Notes that the debate on the Constitutional Treaty is also a debate on European identity and its many and diverse values; takes the view that the EU’s programmes on culture and education policy make a substantial contribution to building up an awareness of being European and preserving and further developing European cultures; draws attention therefore to the importance of a suitable budget for culture and education, in the financial perspective as well as elsewhere;
Čas na zamyslenie: štruktúra, témy a rámec hodnotenia rozpravy o Európskej únii
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Rozšírená spolupráca
Enhanced cooperation – date announced in plenary
Dátum prijatia návrhov
Date adopted
o období zvažovania: štruktúra, témy a rámec hodnotenia diskusie o Európskej únii
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Výbor pre právne veci žiada Výbor pre ústavné veci, aby ako gestorský výbor prijal do svojho návrhu uznesenia tieto návrhy:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Výbor pre právne veci
The Committee on Legal Affairs
88. , ale spôsob verejnej diskusie v Únii v období zvažovania;
88. , but rather the method of public debate in the Union during the period of reflection;
5. pripomína, že Ústava je výsledkom širokej dohody, na ktorej sa zúčastnili parlamenty a vlády všetkých členských štátov, ako aj všetky európske inštitúcie;
Recalls that the Constitution is the outcome of a broad consensus involving the parliaments and governments of all Member States and all European institutions;
8. domnieva sa, že Rada predpokladala realizáciu vyhlásenia a začala sa problémom zaoberať tým, že sa rozhodla ustanoviť obdobie zvažovania s cieľom prekonať ťažkosti a súčasne umožniť členským štátom, ktoré majú záujem, pokračovať v ratifikačnom procese;
Believes that the Council has anticipated the implementation of the Declaration and addressed the problem by deciding to set a period of reflection to overcome the difficulties, while allowing those Member States which so wish to pursue the ratification process;
11. upozorňuje, že Európsky parlament vo svojom uznesení k prístupovému procesu s Tureckom poukázal na to, že prijatie Zmluvy o Ústave pre Európu je predpokladom každého ďalšieho rozširovania a že otvorenosť Európskej únie na prijímanie nových členov v súčasnosti nadobúda väčší význam aj na úrovni Rady;
Points out that the European Parliament noted in its resolution on Turkey’s accession procedure that the adoption of a European Constitution was a precondition for any further enlargement and that the ability of the European Union to absorb new members has now also been given greater significance at Council level;
14. okrem toho považuje za potrebné viesť štruktúrovanú, interaktívnu a účinnú diskusiu, napríklad s európskymi občanmi, občianskou spoločnosťou, sociálnymi partnermi, národnými parlamentmi, politickými stranami a inštitúciami Únie; na tento účel navrhuje:
Considers it necessary, furthermore, to pursue a structured, interactive and goal-oriented debate with, among others, European citizens, civil society, the social partners, the national parliaments, the political parties and the institutions of the Union; proposes to this end:
Dotazník má byť k dispozícii aj na internete;
It should also be used on websites;
b) prostredníctvom metódy prieskumu verejnej mienky (EUROBAROMETER) uskutočniť reprezentatívny prehľad názorov občianok a občanov o prínose Ústavy a o budúcnosti Únie;
(b) a representative profile of the opinions of citizens on the contribution of the Constitution and the future of the Union should be obtained by means of public opinion polls (EUROBAROMETER);
c) v každom členskom štáte zostaviť tím poverený vedením takýchto diskusií a vypracovaním správy o postoji občianok a občanov v príslušnom členskom štáte; takýmito spravodajcami by mohli byť poslanci Európskeho parlamentu a príslušných národných parlamentov;
(c) a team should be set up in each Member State to conduct these discussions and to draw up a report on the attitudes of citizens in their Member State; members of the European and national parliaments could play this role;
15. domnieva sa, že ak boli v rámci Zmluvy o Ústave pre Európu predložené návrhy, na základe ktorých by sa Európska únia bezpochyby viac priblížila svojim občanom, práca na nich by mala pokračovať, a vzhľadom na záver Európskeho ombudsmana v osobitnej správe, podľa ktorej je Rada vinná zo zlého riadenia pri prijímaní právnych predpisov v tajnosti, vyzýva Radu, aby okamžite vyhovela odporúčaniam Európskeho ombudsmana;
Considers that where there were suggestions within the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe that would without question make the EU more citizen-friendly, work on these should continue, and in particular, given the finding by the European Ombudsman in a Special Report that the Council is guilty of maladministration when legislating in secret, calls upon the Council to comply immediately within the Ombudsman's recommendations;
o období úvah: štruktúra, témy a kontext pre hodnotenie diskusie o Európskej únii
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Výbor pre občianske slobody, spravodlivosť a vnútorné veci žiada Výbor pre ústavné veci, aby ako gestorský výbor prijal do svojho návrhu uznesenia tieto návrhy:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. zdôrazňuje strategický význam Parlamentu vo verejnej diskusii o Ústave a potrebu rozvíjať formy komunikácie pre mobilizáciu občanov;
Emphasises the strategic importance of Parliament in the public debate on the Constitution and the need for forms of communication to be developed which will engage the general public;
5. uznáva, že ratifikácia Ústavy sa v súčasnosti stretáva s veľkými ťažkosťami, ktoré si vyžadujú zvýšené úsilie vlád a národných parlamentov ako aj inštitúcií Únie, aby jej poskytli prostriedky zodpovedajúce výzvam a očakávaniam občanov, najmä na boj proti kriminalite a terorizmu, pričom je potrebné zabezpečiť prísne dodržiavanie základných slobôd; domnieva sa, že tieto ciele sa budú najlepšie realizovať v rámci Ústavy;
Recognises that ratification of the Constitution is now beset by serious difficulties that will require the national governments and parliaments, as well as the Union institutions, to redouble their efforts to provide the Union with means of action commensurate with what is at stake and what citizens expect, especially in order to fight crime and terrorism without in any way encroaching on fundamental freedoms; considers that such objectives can best be attained through a Constitution;
- článok 67 Zmluvy o ES, najmä pokiaľ ide o potrebu zabezpečiť úplnú jurisdikciu Súdneho dvora a
- Article 67 of the EC Treaty, especially as regards the need to confer full jurisdiction on the Court of Justice, and
- článok 42 Zmluvy o ES, v znení ustanovenom Maastrichtskou zmluvou;
- Article 42 of the EU Treaty, in the form first laid down in the Maastricht Treaty;
Stanovisko dátum predloženia v pléne
Committee asked for its opinion Date announced in plenary
Predchádzajúci spravodajca (-ovia)
Draftsman replaced
k obdobiu úvah: štruktúra, témy a kontext pre hodnotenie rozpravy o Európskej únii
on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union
Výbor pre práva žien a rovnosť pohlaví žiada Výbor pre ústavné veci, aby ako gestorský výbor prijal do svojho návrhu uznesenia tieto návrhy:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. berúc do úvahy vyhlásenie Európskej rady, na základe ktorého celkovo zhodnotí rokovania na národnej úrovni a odsúhlasí ďalší postup v prvej polovici roku 2006,
A. noting the declaration of the European Council, according to which it will "make an overall assessment of the national debates and agree how to proceed" in the first half of 2006,
B. keďže ženy tvoria viac ako polovicu voličov v EÚ, hoci sa len málo zúčastňujú na politickom živote a ich hlasy môžu byť rozhodujúce,
B. whereas more than half of voters in the EU are women, although they participate little in political life, and whereas their votes can be decisive,
C. keďže cieľom plánu „D“ Komisie, ktorý znamená dialóg, diskusiu a demokraciu je rozvinutie novej diskusie v Európe, do ktorej sa zapojili nielen európske, ale aj národné inštitúcie, celá občianska spoločnosť a predovšetkým ženy,
C. whereas the Commission’s plan "D" , which stands for Dialogue, Debate and Democracy, is aimed at launching a new European debate involving not only European and national institutions but also civil society as a whole, of which women form a major part,
D. keďže proces ratifikácie a diskusie v členských štátoch ukázali, že najmä postoj mladých ľudí k ústavnej zmluve sa zdá byť viac nerozhodným a negatívnym,
D. whereas the ratification process and debates in the Member States have demonstrated that young people in particular appear more undecided about and negative towards the Constitutional Treaty,
4. podporuje rovnocennejšie zastúpenie mužov a žien v rozhodovacom procese inštitúcií o budúcnosti Európy a o ústavnej zmluve, a to nielen kvôli podpore rovnosti pohlaví, ale aj v mene reprezentatívnej a participatívnej demokracie;
Supports a more equal gender balance in institutional decision-making regarding the future of Europe and the Constitutional Treaty, not only for the promotion of gender equality, but also in the name of representative and participatory democracy;
8. odporúča, aby sa diskusia rozšírila o otázky týkajúce sa budúcnosti Európy a o otázky, ktoré sa stali jadrom kampaní pri referendách ako je cieľ európskej integrácie, úloha Európy vo svete a budúcnosť európskeho sociálneho a hospodárskeho modelu a aby sa do tejto diskusie zapojili všetci občania Európy;
Recommends broadening the debate to include questions, with the participation of all European citizens, about the future of Europe and issues that were at the heart of the referenda campaigns, such as the aim of European integration, Europe's role in the world and the future of the European social and economic model;
10. upozorňuje členské štáty, že dialóg o budovaní Európy sprevádza dodržiavanie rovnosti medzi ženami a mužmi ako základnej hodnoty a že táto rovnosť je nositeľom mieru, slobody a spravodlivosti spoločenského pokroku;
Reminds the Member States that any dialogue on the European venture must necessarily include a recognition, as a fundamental value, of the equality of women and men, in the knowledge that this equality is a vector of peace, freedom, justice and social progress;
12. dôrazne žiada, aby boli všetky úvahy o budúcnosti Európy vyslovené so zreteľom na „jednotu v rôznorodosti“ a rovnosť pohlaví a aby bol vyzdvihnutý boj proti všetkým formám diskriminácie.
Insists that any reflection on the future of Europe must be based on respect for "unity in diversity" and gender equality, and that the fight against all forms of discrimination must be upheld.
Obdobie úvah: štruktúra, témy a kontext pre hodnotenie rozpravy o Európskej únii
The period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union