natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
29 rEcommEndatIon 2 the European parliament, the Council and the Commission should consider limiting Eu funding to measures likely to provide Eu added value, rather than funding already existing national workers’ income support schemes. rEcommEndatIon 3 the European parliament, the Council and the Commission should consider, as an alternative to the EGf scheme, the possibility of adapting the ESf framework in order to support more rapidly workers affected by mass redundancies. this report was adopted by chamber ii, headed by Mr Harald noacK, Member of the court of auditors, on 10 June 2013. 
29 ODPORÚČANIE 2 Európsky parlament, Rada a Komisia by mali zvážiť obmedzenie finančných prostriedkov EÚ na opatrenia, ktoré pravdepodobne prinesú pridanú hodnotu EÚ, a nefinancovať už existujúce vnútroštátne systémy na podporu príjmov pracovníkov. ODPORÚČANIE 3 Európsky parlament, Rada a Komisia by ako alternatívu k systému EGF mali zvážiť možnosť prispôsobiť rámec ESF, aby sa mohli rýchlejšie podporovať pracovníci, ktorí boli hromadne prepustení.
However, the commission has not been informed that any affected workers were ever intentionally excluded. (b) the decision whether to apply for Esf or EGf funding is made at Member state level, on the condition that the Esf operational programme agreed with the commission is compatible with such contemplated Esf support. indeed Esf operational programmes differ from one Member state/region to another. 
Komisia však nebola informovaná o tom, že by niektorí zamestnanci boli niekedy vylúčení zámerne; b) rozhodnutie o podaní žiadosti o financovanie z ESF alebo EGF sa prijíma na úrovni členského štátu za predpokladu, že operačný program ESF, ktorý schválila Komisia, je zlučiteľný s takouto zamýšľanou podporou z ESF. Operačné programy ESF sa v jednotlivých členských štátoch/regiónoch líšia;
31 (c) Whilst the collection of data can always be improved, the commission considers that the EGf has struck a reasonable cost-benefit balance between the obligations placed on Member states and the quality and quantity of data provided. the commission notes that the EGf regulation does not require quantitative reintegration objectives. it is also important to note that the audited Member states respected their reporting obligations as laid down in article 15 of the EGf regulation. common reply to (d) and (e) the commission considers that very few results would have been achieved without EGf support. the mid-term evaluation report prepared by independent experts also confirmed this view. the measures financed by the EGf should be considered as a ‘package’ of interrelated measures, bringing together personalised targeted actions and the necessary income supports. all together they contribute to the success of the operations funded by the EGf. 
31 c) zatiaľ čo zhromažďovanie údajov možno neustále zlepšovať, Komisia sa domnieva, že EGF dosiahol primeranú rovnováhu medzi nákladmi a výnosmi, pokiaľ ide o povinnosti členských štátov v porovnaní s kvalitou a množstvom poskytnutých údajov. Komisia poznamenáva, že nariadením o EGF sa nevyžadujú kvantitatívne ciele opätovného začlenenia. Takisto treba poznamenať, že členské štáty, v ktorých sa vykonal audit, dodržiavali povinnosti týkajúce sa predkladania správ stanovené v článku 15 nariadenia o EGF.
Moreover, the EGf never provided stand-alone income support. from a legal perspective, it should be noted that article 3 of regulation (Ec) no 1927/2006 includes income support, if eligibility requirements are met. it does not impose or exclude any minimum or maximum proportions of allowances. (f) the commission agrees that the current approval process is long and therefore strives to minimise delays where possible whilst ensuring that due process takes place. the fact that the EGf operates outside the multiannual framework unavoidably influences the timeline of procedures. at present the commission is actively working to make progress in reducing the time necessary for approval procedures,for example through the development of e-applications or stricter deadlines for both Member states and the commission in its proposal for the new regulation. 
Z právneho hľadiska treba poznamenať, že článok 3 nariadenia o EGF č. 1927/2006 zahŕňa podporu príjmov v prípade, že sú splnené požiadavky týkajúce sa oprávnenosti. Neukladajú sa ani sa nevylučujú žiadne minimálne alebo maximálne podiely príspevkov. f) Komisia súhlasí s tým, že súčasný postup schvaľovania je dlhý, a preto sa tam, kde je to možné, snaží takéto oneskorenia minimalizovať a zároveň zabezpečiť správny postup schvaľovania.
However, it is important to note that procedures do not determine the speed at which support for workers arrives, nor does it hamper solidarity. Reply of the CoMMISSIoN in fact, the commission stimulates Member states to take action at the earliest possible stage when mass redundancies arise. v. recommendations: (a) the commission accepts the recommendation to ensure the availability of up-to-date and reliable monitoring data. necessary steps have beentaken with the adoption of the commission proposal for the EGf for 2014–20. it includes the introduction of an interim report from the Member states in order to ensure that quicker, more up-to-date and reliable data are available. it should be noted however that this element of the commission proposal was not positively received in the council. the commission has made its proposal whilst aiming to ensure a reasonable cost-benefit balance between the obligations placed on Member states and the quality and quantity of data required. the commission furthermore observes that national data protection legislation risks hampering the complete implementation of the recommendation. (b) the commission partially accepts the court recommendation and has proposed for 2014–20 a ceiling on allowances (50 %). this proposal should further improve the efficiency and European added value of EGf measures and ensure a level playing field between Member states. furthermore, over the past 6 years, the commission (and subsequently the budgetary authority) has only approved EGf cases likely to provide added value. the conclusions of the mid-term evaluation show that this objective was clearly reached. 
Je však dôležité uvedomiť si, že tieto postupy neurčujú rýchlosť vyplácania podpory pracovníkom ani nenarúšajú solidaritu. ODPOVEDE KOMISIE Komisia v skutočnosti stimuluje členské štáty, aby v prípade hromadného prepúšťania čo najskôr prijali opatrenia. V. Odporúčania: a) Komisia súhlasí s odporúčaním zabezpečiť dostupnosť aktuálnych a spoľahlivých údajov o monitorovaní.
Special report No 7/2013 – Has the European Globalisation adjustment fund delivered Eu added value in reintegrating redundant workers? 32 (c) the commission considers that this recommendation has already been implemented, as the option to include the EGf within the Esf for the period 2014–20 was carefully assessed and analysed in the impact assessment and the ex ante evaluation for the commission’s proposal for the new EGf regulation. the European council and the European parliament have agreed in principle on the continuation of the fund. the commission draws attention to the conclusions of the mid-term evaluation report. this report concludes that the EGf has delivered ‘significant added value’ and ‘independent experts concluded that hardly any results would have been achieved without EGf support’. it should be noted that expenditure under the EGf is by its nature unpredictable whilst the Esf has been established to address medium-to long-term structural problems, which require stable investment strategies. the commission has therefore considered it better to keep the EGf outside the Esf context, and outside the multiannual financial framework, allowing in turn the financial flexibility the EGf requires. the decision whether to apply for Esf or EGf funding is made at Member state level (on the condition that the Esf operational programme agreed with the commission is compatible with such contemplated Esf support). 
7/2013 – Priniesol Európsky fond na prispôsobenie sa globalizácii pridanú hodnotu EÚ v podobe opätovného začlenenia prepustených pracovníkov? 32 c) Komisia sa domnieva, že toto odporúčanie sa už realizovalo, keďže možnosť zahrnúť EGF v rámci ESF na obdobie rokov 2014 – 2020 bola dôkladne posúdená a analyzovaná v posúdení vplyvu a hodnotení ex ante, ktoré sa týkalo návrhu nového nariadenia o EGF zo strany Komisie.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN obServationS 16. the commission acknowledges that some redundant workers who were eligible may not have been included in EGf applications. 
ODPOVEDE KOMISIE PRIPOMIENKY 16. Komisia uznáva, že niektorí prepustení pracovníci, ktorí boli oprávnení, nemuseli byť zaradení do žiadostí o podporu z EGF.
However, the commission has not been informed that any affected workers were ever intentionally excluded. secondly, identifying all enterprises and persons concerned takes time and effort. 
Komisia však nebola informovaná o tom, že by niektorí zamestnanci boli niekedy vylúčení zámerne. Po druhé, identifikovanie všetkých dotknutých podnikov a osôb si vyžaduje čas a úsilie.
Hence, at some stage the Member state may have decided to move ahead with the file, considering the cost (in terms of both finance and time) associated with finding any additional potentially eligible workers to be disproportionate to likely benefits. furthermore, even when not included, affected workers might have received other forms of assistance. 
Členský štát tak môže v určitej fáze rozhodnúť o postúpení zložky, ak usúdi, že náklady (z hľadiska financií a času) spojené s hľadaním ďalších potenciálne oprávnených pracovníkov nie sú primerané so zreteľom na pravdepodobné prínosy. Okrem toho je možné, že dotknutí pracovníci aj v prípade nezaradenia dostávali iné formy pomoci.
Based on the submitted final reports of EGf cases in ireland, the commission considers that an effort has been made by the Member state to establish the link between personalised services and actual labour market needs. 
Komisia sa na základe predložených záverečných správ o prípadoch EGF v Írsku domnieva, že členský štát vynaložil úsilie na vytvorenie prepojenia medzi personalizovanými službami a skutočnými potrebami trhu práce.
23. (a) the observation of the court only applies to those Member states with higher co-financing rates such as the ones listed by the court and cannot be deduced as a general rule. 
23. a) Zistenie Dvora audítorov sa vzťahuje iba na tie členské štáty, ktoré majú vyššiu mieru spolufinancovania ako štáty, ktoré uviedol Dvor audítorov, čo nemožno zovšeobecniť. 24.
24. the commission understands that the united Kingdom never applied for EGf funding because of political reasons rather than due to reasons connected with the EGf itself. 
Komisia sa domnieva, že Spojené kráľovstvo nikdy nepožia-dalo o financovanie z EGF skôr z politických dôvodov, ako z dôvodov súvisiacich so samotným EGF.
25. the commission considers that the Eu level is the most appropriate level for dealing with the impact of changes in world trade patterns. in the light of this political view, it follows that Eu assistance should be provided to those suffering from the impact of globalisation. such EGf support has a strong European added value. the question then becomes whether the clear value added is also expressed through effective action. in that respect the commission underlines that the effectiveness of the EGf can also be assessed by the number of beneficiaries who upgraded their competences and vocational skills, thus improving their employability in the labour market. 
Táto podpora z EGF má veľkú európsku pridanú hodnotu. Vynára sa otázka, či je jasná pridaná hodnota vyjadrená aj prostredníctvom účinných opatrení. Komisia v tejto súvislosti zdôrazňuje, že účinnosť EGF možno posúdiť aj podľa počtu príjemcov, ktorí si zlepšili spôsobilosti a zručnosti potrebné na výkon povolania, čím na trhu práce zvýšili svoju zamestnateľnosť.
33 27. comparisons with international data sources, and in particular with Eurostat data, suggest that integration rates are satisfactory despite the very difficult context. table 2 shows that, on average, 34 % of all participants in the cases audited by the court had already been reintegrated by the end of the EGf assistance, almost 46 % between 3 and 12 months after the end of the EGf assistance and over 51 % of persons reintegrated 12 months after the end of the EGf assistance. the main conclusions of the mid-term evaluation report on the EGf between 2007 and april 2009 indicated an average re-employment rate of 42 % among affected workers immediately after the end of the EGf implementation period across the 15 EGf cases evaluated. this can be considered as a very good result. 
33 27. Z porovnávania s medzinárodnými zdrojmi údajov a najmä s údajmi Eurostatu vyplýva, že miery integrácie sú aj napriek veľmi zložitému kontextu uspokojivé. Z tabuľky 2 vyplýva, že v priemere 34 % všetkých účastníkov v prípadoch kontrolovaných Dvorom audítorov už bolo do skončenia pomoci z EGF opätovne začlenených, takmer 46 % od 3 do 12 mesiacov po skončení pomoci z EGF a viac ako 51 % osôb bolo opätovne začlenených v lehote 12 mesiacov po skončení pomoci z EGF.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 32. income support was never provided as a stand-alone measure. in line with the EGf regulation, it was always part of a package combined with active labour market policy measures which achieve the positive effects confirmed by the mid-term evaluation and many final reports of EGf cases. 
V súlade s nariadením EGF bola vždy súčasťou balíka spojeného s aktívnymi politickými opatreniami trhu práce, ktoré dosahujú pozitívne účinky potvrdené na základe hodnotenia v polovici trvania a mnohými finančnými správami o prípadoch EGF.
Member states acted in accordance with article 3 of regulation (Ec) no 1927/2006 (‘Eligible actions’) when designing the relevant package of personalised EGf measures. during the implementation period, this package of measures is carried out with EGf assistance. these include general job search assistance, training, job search allowances, training allowances, support for entrepreneurship, geographical mobility and employment subsidies. 
1927/2006 („oprávnené opatrenia“). Počas obdobia vykonávania sa tento balík opatrení vykonáva prostredníctvom pomoci z EGF. Tieto opatrenia zahŕňajú: všeobecnú pomoc pri hľadaní zamestnania, odbornú prípravu, príspevky na hľadanie zamestnania, príspevky na odbornú prípravu, podporu podnikania, dotáciu na geografickú mobilitu a zamestnanosť atď.
34. the purpose of Esf monitoring data is not to identify tens of thousands of (potential) Esf projects supported through the current 117 Esf operational programmes (2007–13). instead, the remit of this monitoring is to collect statistics on the implementation of programmes through financial data (broken down by priorities as defined in the Esf regulation) and data on the number of persons supported (including breakdowns by gender, educational attainment, etc.). as regards the quality of Esf monitoring data, the commission notes that: (a) the quality of indicators is constantly improving; (b) the commission takes action in monitoring committee meetings when it considers the result indicators are insufficient; (c) the commission checks how actions meet their targets on the basis of all information received and through ex post evaluation. for the period 2014–20, the commission has proposed mandatory output and result indicators. 
34. Účelom monitorovania údajov týkajúcich sa ESF nie je identifikovať desiatky tisícov (potenciálnych) projektov ESF podporovaných zo súčasných 117 operačných programov ESF (obdobie rokov 2007 – 2013). Namiesto toho je cieľom tohto monitorovania zhromaždiť štatistiky o realizácii programov prostredníctvom finančných údajov (rozdelené podľa priorít vymedzených v nariadení o ESF) a údajov o počte podporovaných osôb (vrátane rozdelenia podľa pohlavia, dosiahnutého vzdelania atď.).
36. the EGf financing is to allow Member states to take actions on the ground after they have spent the amount set aside for co-financing; it does not determine their speed of implementation, nor should it influence the speed with which these actions are initiated. 
36. Financovanie z EGF má umožniť členským štátom, aby prijali opatrenia na mieste potom, ako minuli sumu vyhradenú na spolufinancovanie; nemá to vplyv na rýchlosť implementácie ani by to nemalo ovplyvniť rýchlosť zavádzania týchto opatrení.
34 it is the Member states’ responsibility to ensure that the right assistance reaches their unemployed workers as soon as possible. 
34 Je povinnosťou členských štátov zabezpečiť, aby bola nezamestnaným pracovníkom čo najskôr poskytnutá správna pomoc.
Late adoption of financing decisions for actions that should be (pre-) financed nationally should not be seen as an obstacle to enhancing the speed of implementation. 
Neskoré prijatie rozhodnutí o financovaní opatrení, ktoré by sa mali (vopred) financovať na vnútroštátnej úrovni, by sa nemalo považovať za prekážku urýchlenia implementácie.
38. the EGf and Esf are complementary funds which provide either long-term strategic help or act as a one-off time-limited and specific response to a single restructuring ‘emergency’. if the EGf funds come in, for specific reasons valid in this case, later than other support funds, the EGf objective is nevertheless met. it must be noted that it is up to each Member state to manage the complementarity between the Esf and EGf in the best possible manner given the local conditions prevailing at the time. 
38. EGF a ESF sú doplnkové fondy, ktoré poskytujú buď dlhodobú strategickú pomoc, alebo fungujú ako jednorazová časovo obmedzená a osobitná reakcia na mimoriadne okolnosti reštrukturalizácie.
43. in this global context, it should be noted that the commission cannot be aware at this stage of the possible impact of differences in the overall affected population and their respective employability. 
43. V tomto celkovom kontexte treba poznamenať, že Komisia v tejto fáze nemôže poznať možný vplyv rozdielov na celkové dotknuté obyvateľstvo a ich príslušnú zamestnateľnosť.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 46. the commission has carefully examined all final reports and, when necessary, taken further action. all important data are being recorded in the EGf database, allowing the commission to monitor and report. regarding the nature and the percentage of allowances paid or committed for EGf cases, the situation is as follows. on the basis of applications, the commission has an expectation as regards the share of allowances in the final total expenditure of a project. then, upon reception of the final report, the commission is informed of the actual expenditure. 
Komisia dôkladne preskúmala všetky záverečné správy a v prípade potreby prijala ďalšie opatrenia. Všetky dôležité údaje sa zaznamenávajú v databáze EGF, čo Komisii umožňuje monitorovanie a predkladanie správ. Pokiaľ ide o povahu a percentuálny podiel príspevkov, ktoré boli vyplatené alebo viazané pre všetky prípady EGF, situácia je takáto: Komisia má na základe žiadostí očakávania, pokiaľ ide o podiel príspevkov na celkových konečných výdavkoch projektu.
Both sources are used for the database, allowing the extraction of in-depth information. it should be noted that final reports, by their very nature, become available 6 months after the end of the implementation period. 
Oba zdroje sa používajú pre databázu, čo umožňuje získavanie podrobných informácií. Treba poznamenať, že záverečné správy sú na základe svojho charakteru k dispozícii šesť mesiacov po skončení obdobia vykonávania.
Hence, final data are not yet available for all cases, since for many cases implementation is ongoing. the commission is improving the monitoring of all support measures by further developing its database and providing for an interim report to be presented by Member states in its proposal for the EGf regulation for 2014–20. 
Z tohto dôvodu ešte nie sú dostupné konečné údaje pre všetky prípady, keďže mnohé z nich sa nachádzajú vo fáze realizácie. Komisia zdokonaľuje monitorovanie všetkých podporných opatrení tým, že ďalej rozvíja svoju databázu a vo svojom návrhu nariadenia o EGF na obdobie rokov 2014 – 2020 stanovuje, že členské štáty majú predkladať predbežnú správu.
47. the commission considers that the Eu level is the most appropriate level for dealing with the impact of changes in world trade patterns. 
47. Komisia sa domnieva, že úroveň EÚ je najvhodnejšia na riešenie vplyvu zmien v usporiadaní svetového obchodu.
48. the EGf co-finances, on the basis of article 3, integrated support packages to workers, including allowances in relation to job search and mobility or allowances to individuals in lifelong learning and training activities. 
48. EGF na základe článku 3 spolufinancuje integrované balíky podpory určenej pracovníkom vrátane príspevkov na hľadanie zamestnania a mobilitu alebo príspevkov jednotlivcom v rámci opatrení týkajúcich sa celoživotného vzdelávania a odbornej prípravy.
35 furthermore, the Eurostat labour market policy database methodology states (in line with the oEcd definition) that the unemployment benefits received by participants in labour market policy measures (instead of receiving training allowances, wages or similar) should be included as part of the expenditure for that measure and excluded from the amounts reported as unemployment benefits. rEplY of tHE CommISSIoN 52. article 3 of the EGf regulation does not exclude income support, provided that the support is an integral part of the package which includes, for example, training, mentoring, support for micro-business start-up, etc. 
35 Okrem toho v dokumente Eurostatu Databáza politiky na trhu práce – Metodika sa uvádza (v súlade s vymedzením OECD), že dávky v nezamestnanosti, ktoré dostávajú účastníci opatrení politiky trhu práce (namiesto poberania príspevkov na odbornú prípravu, miezd a podobne) by mali byť súčasťou výdavkov na uvedené opatrenie a mali by byť vylúčené z prostriedkov vykázaných ako dávky v nezamestnanosti.
Moreover, article 3 does not impose or exclude any minimum or maximum proportions of allowances. 
Okrem toho sa článkom 3 neukladajú ani nevylučujú žiadne minimálne alebo maximálne podiely príspevkov.
53. the commission does not share the court’s criticism as training and income support should be viewed as a package. the commission recalls that the current EGf regulation prohibits the co-funding of passive measures. common reply to paragraphs 54–56. the commission observes that the current EGf regulation prohibits the co-funding of passive measures, but does not place a ceiling on allowances within a package of personalised measures. such a ceiling has been proposed for the future EGf regulation (2014–20), where it is to be set at 50 %. the reason for the proposed change is to reinforce the efficiency of EGf measures and to level the playing field between Member states. in addition, as noted for paragraph 46, the commission does have a database in which relevant data and statistics provided through the submission of cases as well as those provided through the EGf final reports are available. common reply to paragraphs 57–59. the commission considers that both Member states were treated in a consistent and equal manner. the EGf is administered in shared management. therefore, the commission needs to rely on the information made available by the Member states. it analyses this information and bases its actions on that assessment, and in addition it audits the EGf cases according to its risk assessment criteria. 
Komisia pripomína, že súčasným nariadením o EGF sa zakazuje spolufinancovanie pasívnych opatrení. Spoločná odpoveď na body 54 – 56. Komisia pripomína, že súčasným nariadením o EGF sa zakazuje spolufinancovanie pasívnych opatrení, ale nestanovuje sa strop pre príspevky v rámci balíka personalizovaných opatrení.