natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
61 annEX vII transparEncy of dEclaratIons of IntErEsts and dEcIsIon-makInG procEss Area Type of document published on Agency's website EASA EMA EFSA ECHA Management Declaration of interest of Executive Director No Yes Yes Yes Curriculum vitae of Executive director Yes Yes Yes Yes Declarations of interest of Agency's management (e.g., Directors, Head of Units) No No Yes No Declaration of interest of Management Board Members No Yes Yes Yes Curriculum vitae of Management Board Members No Yes (not for all) Yes Yes Declarations of interest of Board of Appeal No N/A N/A No Minutes of the meetings of the Management Board Yes Yes Yes3 Yes Experts List of Experts or Members of committees No Yes Yes Yes Declaration of interest of Experts No Yes Yes Yes Curriculum vitae of Experts No Yes2 Yes Yes Minutes of the meetings of the Scientific Committees and bodies and experts Yes (not for all)1 Yes (not for all) Yes Yes Results of the scientific studies Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Public consultations on independence policy No No Yes No Involvement of external evaluators in the recruitment of the scientific bodies' experts No No Yes No Possibility of external observers to participate in the scientific bodies' or Management Board' meetings Yes Yes Yes Yes 1 Easa publishes the minutes of the consultative bodies’ meetings concerning rulemaking activities. 
TRANSPARENTNOSŤ VYHLÁSENÍ O ZÁUJME A ROZHODOVACIEHO PROCESU 61 PRÍLOHA VII Oblasť Druh dokumentu uverejneného na internetovej stránke agentúry EASA EMA EFSA ECHA Vedúci pracovníci Vyhlásenie o záujme výkonného riaditeľa Nie Áno Áno Áno Životopis výkonného riaditeľa Áno Áno Áno Áno Vyhlásenia o záujme vedúcich pracovníkov agentúry (napr. riaditeľov, vedúcich oddelení) Nie Nie Áno Nie Vyhlásenia o záujme členov správnej rady Nie Áno Áno Áno Životopisy členov správnej rady Nie Áno (nie pre všetkých) Áno Áno Vyhlásenia o záujme odvolacej rady Nie Nevzťahuje sa Nevzťahuje sa Nie Zápisnica zo zasadnutí správnej rady Áno Áno Áno3 Áno Experti Zoznam expertov alebo členov výborov Nie Áno Áno Áno Vyhlásenia o záujme expertov Nie Áno Áno Áno Životopisy expertov Nie Áno2 Áno Áno Zápisnica zo zasadnutí vedeckých výborov, inštitúcií a expertov Áno (nie pre všetkých)1 Áno (nie pre všetkých) Áno Áno Výsledky vedeckých štúdií Áno Áno Áno Áno Ostatní Verejné konzultácie o politike nezávislosti Nie Nie Áno Nie Účasť externých posudzovateľov na nábore expertov vedeckých inštitúcií Nie Nie Áno Nie Možnosť pre vonkajších pozorovateľov zúčastniť sa na zasadnutiach vedeckých orgánov alebo správnej rady Áno Áno Áno Áno 1 EASA zverejňuje zápisnice zo zasadnutí konzultačných orgánov týkajúcich sa činností v oblasti tvorby predpisov.
However, minutes of the meetings which would include assessment of conflict of interest are not published. 
Avšak zápisnice zo zasadnutí, ktoré obsahujú posúdenie konfliktu záujmov, sa nezverejňujú.
2 for Members of the committees.. 
2 Týka sa členov výborov.
3 Efsa audiocasts live on its website the meetings of the Management Board.. Special report No 15/2012 – Management of conflict of interest in selected Eu agencies 
3 EFSA na svojej internetovej stránke vysiela naživo rozhlasový prenos Osobitná správa č. 15/2012 – Riadenie konfliktu záujmov vo vybraných agentúrach EÚ
62 Special report No 15/2012 – Management of conflict of interest in selected Eu agencies rEply of tHE CoMMISSIoN exeCutive suMMary i. the commission welcomes this report and supports the improvement of the management of conflicts of interest in Eu decentralised agencies. the inter-institutional Working Group on Eu decentralised agencies, steered by the commission, is about to formally agree on a common approach where the issue of conflicts of interests is addressed in the following way: — paragraph 11: ‘a coherent policy on preventing and managing conflict of interests concerning members of the Management Board, whether or not they sit in personal capacity, should be developed and applied in all agencies.’ — paragraph 18: ‘a coherent policy on preventing and managing conflict of interests concerning the director should be developed and applied in all agencies. the commission should examine, together with the agencies, whether there is scope for a harmonised approach.’ furthermore, the need to ensure the independence of members of scientific committees and boards of appeal is also mentioned. the commission will present a roadmap on the implementation of the common approach by the end of 2012, where it will, amongst other things, indicate how it intends to work with agencies to follow-up on these provisions. in this context, the potential need to develop an Eu regulatory framework will be duly considered. finally, there are other instruments are in place to avoid conflict of interest. in particular: collegiality of the scientific committee/panels (about 20 members of the committee/panels peer reviewing Working Groups drafts) to avoid an individually-led process; inter-disciplinarity and multi-disciplinarity (composition ensuring all scientific aspects); absence of hierarchical links among and between experts; decisions adopted by majority and minority opinions recorded. 
62 Osobitná správa č. 15/2012 – Riadenie konfliktu záujmov vo vybraných agentúrach EÚ ODPOVEĎ KOMISIE ZHRNUTIE I. Komisia víta túto správu a podporuje zlepšenie riadenia konfliktu záujmov v decentralizovaných orgánoch EÚ. Medziinštitucionálna pracovná skupina pre decentralizované orgány EÚ riadená Komisiou čoskoro formálne odsúhlasí spoločný postup, v ktorom sa otázka konfliktu záujmov rieši takto: — bod 11: „Vo všetkých agentúrach by sa mala vypracovať a uplatňovať zosúladená politika prevencie a riadenia konfliktu záujmov v prípade členov predstavenstva bez ohľadu na to, či boli vybraní na základe osobnej spôsobilosti alebo nie.“ — bod 18: „Vo všetkých agentúrach by sa mala vypracovať a uplatňovať zosúladená politika prevencie a riadenia prípadného konfliktu záujmov riaditeľa.
63 iv. although there is no detailed regulatory framework, as far as the staff of the agencies covered by the staff regulations is concerned, the legislator, while setting the general principles, left the margin of discretion to the appointing authority of each institution/agency to adjust the rules to their specificities and adopt detailed/tailor-made implementing rules. x. (c) (vii) in view of raising awareness of the importance of good management of issues such as conflict of interest, the commission offers training in the area of ethics. the agencies may benefit from this offer by signing service level agreements with the commission. the training on ethics and integrity is a one-day comprehensive training that presents the principle of professional ethics. its main objective is to raise staff awareness on the main obligations as provided for in the staff regulations. the crux of the training is to give clear and basic guidelines to a staff member so that he/she acts in an objective, impartial and loyal way. the understanding of the main principles is vital in order to achieve that staff covered by the staff regulations respect the interests of the European union. it is more effective to present clearly the goal (the principles of professional ethics) than the specific ways to reach the goal. x. (c) (viii) the commission has given effect to the provisions of the staff regulations governing post-employment issues by decision 85-2004 of 29 June 2004 on outside activities. the commission considers that it should apply by analogy to the staff of the agencies. 
63 IV. Hoci neexistuje podrobný regulačný rámec, pokiaľ ide o zamestnancov agentúr, na ktorých sa vzťahuje služobný poriadok, zákonodarca pri stanovovaní všeobecných zásad ponechal menovacím orgánom jednotlivých inštitúcií/ agentúr priestor na rozhodovanie podľa vlastného uváženia, aby mohli upraviť pravidlá podľa svojich konkrétnych potrieb a prijať podrobné/na mieru prispôsobené vykonávacie pravidlá.
Within the confines of the procedure under article 110 of the staff regulations, all agencies in question (for their staff covered by the staff regulations) have submitted to the commission for agreement the draft implementing rules on outside activities. the commission gave its agreement to: Reply of the CoMMISSIoN Easa by decision c(2006) 7264 EMa by decision c(2006) 7264 Efsa by decision c(2009)5682 EcHa by decision c(2008) 3471. x. (e) the commission supports and encourages the improvement in terms of management of conflict of interests which has been emphasized during the discussions within the inter-institutional working group on decentralized agencies. according to the staff regulations, the agencies have an independent status and the appointing authority powers are exercised by them. this includes the application/imple-mentation of the rules in question. in accordance with article 110 of the staff regulations, agencies adopt implementing rules giving effect to the sr or cEos measures in agreement with the commission. this implies that each agency is bound to submit to the commission any draft rule giving effect to the sr before its adoption. the commission proposed, in the context of the revised procedure of article 110 of the staff regulations, a by default application of the commission rules to statutory staff of the agencies. see also reply to paragraph i. 
ODPOVEĎ KOMISIE EASA rozhodnutím K(2006) 7264 EMA rozhodnutím K(2006) 7264 EFSA rozhodnutím K(2009) 5682 ECHA rozhodnutím K(2008) 3471. X. e) Komisia podporuje a stimuluje zlepšenie riadenia konfliktu záujmov, ktoré sa zdôrazňovalo počas rokovaní v rámci medziinštitucionálnej pracovnej skupiny pre decentralizované agentúry. Podľa služobného poriadku majú agentúry nezávislé postavenie a vykonávajú právomoci menovacieho orgánu.
64 introduCtion 1. see reply to paragaph 21. 
64 ÚVOD 1. Pozri odpoveď na bod č.
10. these rules only apply to staff employed and paid by agencies. it is not possible to apply them to persons designated ‘ad personam’ (not employed by the agencies) such as members of Management Boards and scientific experts in general or to persons representing Ms (members of agencies' Boards representing Ms and institutions). audit sCoPe and aPProaCh 21. the oEcd guidelines (like the Eu staff regulations) only focus on public officials employed by public authorities (and not on those who are not staff ). oEcd guidelines may be applied to other categories of professionals by analogy. 
10. Tieto pravidlá platia iba pre personál, ktorý zamestnávajú a platia agentúry. Nie je možné ich uplatňovať na osoby určené ad personam (ktorých nezamestnávajú agentúry), ako sú členovia správnych rád a vedeckí odborníci vo všeobecnosti, ani na osoby zastupujúce členské štáty (členovia správnych rád agentúr, ktorí zastupujú členské štáty a inštitúcie).
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 82. the obligations under article 16 of the staff regulations are regularly drawn to the attention of the staff. this is particularly so in pre-retirement courses where a specific module is offered on the continuing ethical responsibilities after leaving the service with a particular focus on article 16. the ethics pages of the commission intranet feature a section on article 16. pending adoption of the new staff regulations, a major awareness raising campaign will run to accompany proposed new guidelines on outside activities, including those carried out after leaving the service. as all officials are bound by the staff regulations, the employment arrangements already contain appropriate messages. 
ODPOVEĎ KOMISIE 82. Zamestnanci sú pravidelne upozorňovaní na svoje povinnosti podľa článku 16 služobného poriadku. Je tomu tak hlavne v preddôchodkových kurzoch, pri ktorých sa ponúka osobitný modul zameraný na etické povinnosti po odchode zo služby s osobitným zreteľom na článok 16.
ConClusions and reCoMMendations recommendation 8 in view of raising awareness of the importance of good management of issues such as conflict of interest, the commission offers training in the area of ethics. the agencies may benefit from this offer by signing service level agreements with the commission. the training on ethics and integrity is a one-day comprehensive training that presents the principle of professional ethics. its main objective is to raise staff awareness on the main obligations as provided for in the staff regulations. the crux of the training is to give clear and basic guidelines to a staff member so that he/she acts in an objective, impartial and loyal way. the understanding of the main principles is vital in order to achieve that staff covered by the staff regulations respect the interests of the European union. it is more effective to present clearly the goal (the principles of professional ethics) than the specific ways to reach the goal. 
Keďže všetci úradníci sú viazaní služobným poriadkom, úpravy podmienok zamestnávania už obsahujú príslušné informácie. ZÁVERY A ODPORÚČANIA Odporúčanie 8 Vzhľadom na zvyšovanie povedomia o dôležitosti správneho riadenia oblastí, ako je konflikt záujmov, Komisia ponúka odbornú prípravu v oblasti etiky.
65 98. first bullet the commission has given effect to the provisions of the staff regulations governing post-employment issues by decision 85-2004 of 29 June 2004 on outside activities. the commission considers that it should apply by analogy to the staff of the agencies. 
65 98. Prvá zarážka Komisia svojím rozhodnutím 85-2004 z 29. júna 2004 o vedľajších činnostiach uviedla do účinnosti ustanovenia služobného poriadku, ktoré upravujú otázky obdobia po skončení zamestnania.
Within the confines of the procedure under article 110 of the staff regulations, all agencies in question (for their staff covered by the staff regulations) have submitted to the commission for agreement the draft implementing rules on outside activities. the commission gave its agreement to: Easa by decision c(2006) 7264 EMa by decision c(2006) 7264 Efsa by decision c(2009)5682 EcHa by decision c(2008) 3471. 
V súlade s postupom podľa článku 110 služobného poriadku všetky tieto agentúry predložili Komisii (za svojich zamestnancov, na ktorých sa vzťahuje služobný poriadok) na schválenie návrh vykonávacích pravidiel týkajúcich sa vedľajších činností. Komisia vyjadrila svoj súhlas pre: EASA rozhodnutím K(2006) 7264 EMA rozhodnutím K(2006) 7264 EFSA rozhodnutím K(2009) 5682 ECHA rozhodnutím K(2008) 3471.
99. although there is no detailed regulatory framework, as far as the staff of the agencies covered by the staff regulations is concerned, the legislator, while setting the general principles, left the margin of discretion to the appointing authority of each institution/agency to adjust the rules to their specificities and adopt detailed/tailor-made implementing rules. the inter-institutional Working Group on Eu decentralised agencies, steered by the commission, is about to formally agree on a common approach where the issue of conflicts of interests is addressed in the following way: — paragraph 11: ‘a coherent policy on preventing and managing conflict of interests concerning members of the Management Board, whether or not they sit in personal capacity, should be developed and applied in all agencies.’ — paragraph 18: ‘a coherent policy on preventing and managing conflict of interests concerning the director should be developed and applied in all agencies. the commission should examine, together with the agencies, whether there is scope for a harmonised approach.’ 
99. Hoci neexistuje podrobný regulačný rámec, pokiaľ ide o zamestnancov agentúr, na ktorých sa vzťahuje služobný poriadok, zákonodarca pri stanovovaní všeobecných zásad ponechal menovacím orgánom jednotlivých inštitúcií/ agentúr priestor na rozhodovanie podľa vlastného uváženia, aby si mohli upraviť pravidlá na svoje konkrétne podmienky a prijali podrobné/na mieru prispôsobené vykonávacie pravidlá.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN furthermore, the need to ensure the independence of members of scientific committees and boards of appeal is also mentioned. the commission will present a roadmap on the implementation of the common approach by the end of 2012, where it will, amongst other things, indicate how it intends to work with agencies to follow-up on these provisions. in this context, the potential need to develop an Eu regulatory framework will be duly considered. recommendations 10 and 11 the commission supports and encourages the improvement in terms of management of conflict of interests which has been emphasized during the discussions within the inter-institutional working group on decentralized agencies. according to the staff regulations, the agencies have an independent status and the appointing authority powers are exercised by them. this includes the application/imple-mentation of the rules in question. in accordance with article 110 of the staff regulations, agencies adopt implementing rules giving effect to the sr or cEos measures in agreement with the commission. this implies that each agency is bound to submit to the commission any draft rule giving effect to the sr before its adoption. the commission proposed, in the context of the revised procedure of article 110 of the staff regulations, a by default application of the commission rules to statutory staff of the agencies. (see also reply to paragraph 99). 
Komisia by mala spolu s agentúrami preskúmať, či existuje priestor na zosúladený postup.“ ODPOVEĎ KOMISIE Okrem toho sa uvádza, že je potrebné zabezpečiť nezávislosť členov vedeckých výborov a odvolacích rád. Komisia predloží plán na implementáciu spoločného postupu do konca roku 2012, pričom okrem iného uvedie, ako chce v spolupráci s agentúrami vykonávať kontrolu uplatňovania týchto ustanovení. V tejto súvislosti sa náležite prihliadne na prípadnú potreba vypracovania regulačného rámca EÚ.
exeCutive suMMary i. the selected agencies acknowledge the report and recommendations. the report could serve as a basis for a shared work to be undertaken with the European commission and the other Eu institutions to develop a common union framework and/or minimum standards, as it was concluded by the Eu legislator in the context of the inter-institutional Working Group on regulatory agencies. iv. there are specific legislative requirements applicable to the individual agencies. in this context, the selected agencies developed policies and procedures; and are continuously enhancing these, mainly on the basis of agency-specific regulatory requirements. in the absence of a comprehensive Eu framework, some agencies indeed referred to the oEcd Guidelines. 
ZHRNUTIE I. Vybrané agentúry vzali na vedomie správu a odporúčania. Správa by mohla poslúžiť ako základ pre spoluprácu s Európskou komisiou a ďalšími inštitúciami EÚ pri príprave spoločného rámca Únie a/alebo minimálnych noriem, ako usúdil zákonodarný orgán EÚ v súvislosti s medziinštitucionálnou pracovnou skupinou pre regulačné agentúry.
However, the oEcd guidelines (like the European staff regulations) only focus on public officials employed by public authorities (and not on those who are not officials like members of Management Board and Board of appeal, external experts). oEcd guidelines may be applied to other categories of professionals by analogy. 
Usmernenia OECD (rovnako ako európsky služobný poriadok) sú zamerané iba na verejných činiteľov, ktorých zamestnávajú verejné orgány (a nie na tých, ktorí nie sú úradníkmi, ako napríklad na členov správnej rady a odvolacej rady, na externých expertov). Usmernenia OECD sa môžu analogicky uplatňovať aj na iné kategórie pracovníkov.
However, when applied, the principles of these guidelines need to be followed taking into account the specific situation in which they are intended to be applied. in the light thereof, Easa will primarily follow the European commission guidelines in the area of code of conduct/Ethics; but also takes into account the oEcd guidelines where needed and consider the specific situations in which they are intended to be applied. v. Easa acknowledges that at the time of the audit, shortcomings were identified when benchmarking the agency’s policies and procedures against oEcd guidelines. it is, however, important to recall in this context that policies and procedures adopted and/or implemented after the court completed its fieldwork (october 2011) have not been evaluated. a significant number of recommendations have thus been addressed by the time of publication of this report. rEply of tHE EuropEaN avIatIoN SafEty agENCy With regard to the finding that ‘none of the selected agencies adequately manages conflict of interests situations’, it deserves clarification that Easa fully comply with its founding regulations and other laws that apply to the agency, such as the Eu financial regulation and the Eu staff regulations. in addition, Easa in the current aforementioned context adopted its own regulations/policies and procedures - taking into account its particular governance and legal requirements from its founding legal acts. 
Je však pri tom potrebné dodržiavať zásady týchto usmernení a zohľadňovať konkrétnu situáciu, v ktorej sa majú uplatňovať. Európska agentúra pre bezpečnosť letectva (EASA) sa bude v tejto súvislosti prednostne riadiť usmerneniami Európskej komisie, ktoré sa týkajú kódexu správania/etického kódexu, v prípade potreby však berie do úvahy aj usmernenia OECD a zvažuje konkrétne situácie, v ktorých sa majú uplatňovať.
Easa wishes to highlight the specific governance structure of Easa and its lack of direct influence on its Management Board, Board of appeal and external experts/organisations. in particular, Easa makes a clear differentiation between Easa itself (agency staff ) and its Management Board (MB)/ Board of appeal, when analysing the issue of potential conflict of interests. 
EASA chce upozorniť na osobitnú štruktúru správy agentúry a nedostatočný priamy vplyv na svoju správnu radu, odvolaciu radu a na externých expertov/ externé organizácie. Pri analyzovaní otázky potenciálneho konfliktu záujmov EASA predovšetkým jednoznačne rozlišuje medzi samotnou agentúrou (zamestnancami agentúry) a svojou správnou radou/odvolacou radou.
Easa and its Management Board have different functions and competences as well as different procedures to adopt decisions. viii. 
Agentúra EASA a jej správna rada majú odlišné funkcie a právomoci, ako aj rozdielne postupy prijímania rozhodnutí. VIII.
Easa currently follows the European commission guidelines on conflict of interest which Easa think are in line with the oEcd guidelines. in order to handle a risk, there are several mitigating controls that can be applied. regarding the risk on potential conflict of interest when taking technical decisions, the agency applies the ‘no single point of decision’ approach as the most appropriate mitigating control for prevention of conflict of interest scenarios within Easa context. impartiality of the decision making in the Easa operational processes is guaranteed through the collegiality of the technical assessment and the decision-making process. the aforementioned has been recently recognised by the European parliament in a resolution from 10 May 2012 (European parliament resolution of 10 May 2012 with observations forming an integral part of its decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European aviation safety agency for the financial year 2010 (c7-0285/2011 – 2011/2224(dEc); see in particular point 16). 
Agentúra EASA v súčasnosti postupuje podľa usmernení Európskej komisie o konflikte záujmov, ktoré sú podľa agentúry v súlade s usmerneniami OECD. V rámci riadenia rizika je možné uplatniť viaceré opatrenia na zmiernenie tohto rizika. Pokiaľ ide o riziko potenciálneho konfliktu záujmov pri prijímaní technických rozhodnutí, agentúra uplatňuje prístup, ktorý zaručuje, že rozhodnutia sa neprijímajú na jedinom mieste, čo je najvhodnejšie opatrenie na zmiernenie rizika s cieľom predchádzať scenárom konfliktu záujmov v podmienkach EASA.
Special report No 15/2012 – Management of conflict of interest in selected Eu agencies 66 
Osobitná správa č. 15/2012 – Riadenie konfliktu záujmov vo vybraných agentúrach EÚ 66