natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is also worth mentioning that the Guidelines stipulated Ôinstitution building (IB) activities will be focused on the weaknesses identified at the central, regional, and local level particularly in view of the increased emphasis to be given to economic and social cohesionŐ. 
It is also worth mentioning that the Guidelines stipulated „institution building (IB) activities will be focused on the weaknesses identified at the central, regional, and local level particularly in view of the increased emphasis to be given to economic and social cohesion“.
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/23 27. 
20.1.2005 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 15/23 27.
ESC objectives (see paragraph 9) were not conflicting and, as quoted in paragraph 24, the Ôtarget regionŐ approach for investments was followed only in the first year of ESC programming (2000). 
ESC objectives (see paragraph 9) were not conflicting and, as quoted in paragraph 24, the „target region“ approach for investments was followed only in the first year of ESC programming (2000).
The Phare Review affirmed that Ôdecentralisation cannot start before 2002 at the earliestŐ and it will not be implemented Ôunless clear preconditions have been met and the necessary financial and human resources are in placeŐ. 
The Phare Review affirmed that „decentralisation cannot start before 2002 at the earliest“ and it will not be implemented „unless clear preconditions have been met and the necessary financial and human resources are in place“.
The Commission acknowledges that introduction of the new ESC instrument in 2000 resulted in slow but progressive implementation but there is no link between introducing EDIS, due to start Ôat the earliest in 2002Ő, and initial difficulties in implementing ESC grant schemes introduced two years earlier. 
The Commission acknowledges that introduction of the new ESC instrument in 2000 resulted in slow but progressive implementation but there is no link between introducing EDIS, due to start „at the earliest in 2002“, and initial difficulties in implementing ESC grant schemes introduced two years earlier.
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the inexperienced agencies learning curve with the new ÔmeasureŐ mechanism. 
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the inexperienced agencies learning curve with the new „measure“ mechanism.
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the learning curve those countries had to undergo with this new ÔmeasureŐ mechanism. 
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the learning curve those countries had to undergo with this new „measure“ mechanism.
C 15/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 35. 
C 15/24 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 20.1.2005 35.
As of 1999, the further alignment with Interreg meant that Joint Programming Documents in a multiannual perspective (although only indica-tive: for Phare those allocations have to be decided on an annual basis) were adopted to cover the 2000 to 2002 period and revised in 2003. 
As of 1999, the further alignment with Interreg meant that Joint Programming Documents in a multiannual perspective (although only indicative: for Phare those allocations have to be decided on an annual basis) were adopted to cover the 2000 to 2002 period and revised in 2003.
The indicative objective of allocating approximately 35 % of Phare national programmes to ESC was Ôto be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basisŐ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999). 
The indicative objective of allocating approximately 35 % of Phare national programmes to ESC was „to be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basis“ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999).
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/25 45. 
20.1.2005 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 15/25 45.
However no tendering rules were ÔbrokenŐ in the sense of an irregularity. 
However no tendering rules were „broken“ in the sense of an irregularity.
C 15/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 61. 
C 15/26 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 20.1.2005 61.
As highlighted in replies to paragraphs 9, 25 and 27, IB was used on the whole territory, at central and regional level, for preparing the structures due to manage the ESC, whereas, as the Phare Review stipulated: ÔPhare investment support in the ESC must be focused on a few priorities if it is to have an impact. 
As highlighted in replies to paragraphs 9, 25 and 27, IB was used on the whole territory, at central and regional level, for preparing the structures due to manage the ESC, whereas, as the Phare Review stipulated: „Phare investment support in the ESC must be focused on a few priorities if it is to have an impact.
This concentration requires a discipline on programming to ensure that resources are not spread too thinly across too many programmesŐ. 
This concentration requires a discipline on programming to ensure that resources are not spread too thinly across too many programmes“.
The indicative (i.e. suggestive, it was not a minimum requirement) 35 % ESC allocation was Ôto be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basisŐ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999). 
The indicative (i.e. suggestive, it was not a minimum requirement) 35 % ESC allocation was „to be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basis“ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999).
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/27 71. 
20.1.2005 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 15/27 71.
The Phare Guidelines have been revised and the Programming Guide for 2004 has already been revised to introduce multiannual planning for ESC and, where appropriate and feasible, also for institution building. 
The Phare Guidelines have been revised and the Programming Guide for 2004 has already been revised to introduce multi-annual planning for ESC and, where appropriate and feasible, also for institution building.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 6/2004 The organisation of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals in the European Union together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 29/01) Photograph: Animal wearing the two statutory ear tags 
4.2.2005 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 29/1 I (Informácie) DVOR AUDÍTOROV OSOBITNÁ SPRÁVA č.
C 29/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
C 29/2 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 4.2.2005 OBSAH ZHRNUTIE .................................................................
Generalcontext......................................................... 
Všeobecnýkontext .......................................................
TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ 
RadaaEurópskyparlament.................................................
GENESISANDEVOLUTIONOFTHESYSTEM..................................... 
Právne predpisy neobsahujú ustanovenia o výmene informácií medzi databázami . . . . . .
Sizeofthebovinesector.................................................. 
PrávnaúpravaSpoločenstvaniejedostatočnepresná .............................
Setting up the cattle identification and registration system Đ background and justification Whatisthecattleidentificationandregistrationsystem? ......................... ROLES AND LEGAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE VARIOUS PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE CATTLE IDENTIFICATIONANDREGISTRATIONSYSTEM.................................. TheCouncilandtheEuropeanParliament .................................... 
Komisia nie je oprávnená prijímať vykonávacie opatrenia v oblasti národných databáz ................................................................ Predpisy Komisie v oblasti kontrol na mieste a sankcií je možné zdokonaliť . . . . . . . . . . .
Thevariouskeepersofcattle............................................... 
Neexistujúpresnépravidlánariadenienárodnýchdatabáz .........................
Introduction ........................................................... 
Nesúladypririadeníprémií .................................................
There is room for improvement in the CommissionŐs rules concerning on-the-spot checks andpenalties.......................................................... . 
Prémie za hovädzí dobytok podliehajú kontrolám v rámci Integrovaného administra-tívnehoakontrolnéhosystému(IACS) ....................................
TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
ZÁVERAODPORÚČANIA.....................................................
31 4.2.2005 Paragraph Page I-X 3 1-6 4 1-3 4 4-6 4 7-32 5 7-10 5 11-17 9 18-26 9 27-32 12 27 12 28 13 29-31 13 32 13 33-46 13 33-34 13 35-37 13 38-39 14 40-41 15 42-46 17 47-78 18 47-54 18 55-64 20 65-71 22 72-77 24 72-74 24 75-77 24 78-91 25 92-99 29 
Body Strana I–IX 3 1–6 4 1–3 4 4–6 4 7–26 5 7–10 5 11–17 9 18–26 9 27– 32 12 27 12 28 13 29–31 13 32 13 33–46 13 33–34 13 35–37 13 38–39 14 40–41 15 42–46 17 47–77 18 47–54 18 55–64 20 65–71 22 72–77 24 72–74 24 75–77 24 78–91 25 92–99 29 ....... 31
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Identifying and registering the bovine herd is an essential prerequisite in guaranteeing the traceability of beef and veal and is also an element in the conditions attached to the various bovine premiums. 
4.2.2005 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie ZHRNUTIE I. Identifikácia a registrácia hovädzieho dobytka je základným predpokladom vysledovania hovädzieho dobytka a je tiež jednou z podmienok na získanie rôznych prémií za hovädzí dobytok.
These premiums amounted to more than 7 000 million euro in 2002 and more than 8 000 million euro in 2004. 
V roku 2002 dosahovali prémie výšku viac ako 7 miliárd EUR a v roku 2004 činili viac ako 8 miliárd EUR.
The main objective of the audit was to evaluate the cattle identification and registration system, at the Commission (design, implementation controls and follow-up) and in the Member States (operational system allowing effective monitoring of animals from birth until slaughter and allowing verification of correct payment of all direct aid). 
Audit sa zameriaval na zhodnotenie systému identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka (SIEB) na úrovni Komisie (koncepcia, kontrola realizácie a monitorovanie) a na úrovni členských štátov (operačný systém umožňujúci účinné sledovanie zvierat od jeho narodenia až po porážku a overenie správnosti všetkých platieb priamej pomoci).
The audit was carried out in the four Member States with the largest bovine herds (Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom). 
Audit prebiehal v štyroch členských štátoch, ktoré sú najväčšími chovateľmi hovädzieho dobytka (Nemecko, Francúzsko, Taliansko a Veľká Británia).
The identification system has four components: ear tags, passports, herd registers and the computerised database containing the details of all cattle. 
Systém identifikácie tvoria štyri prvky, ktorými sú ušné štítky, pasy, registre chovov a počítačová databáza obsahujúca podrobné údaje o každom zvierati.
This database is one component of the system and was to be operational on 31 December 1999 at the latest. 
Táto databáza je jednou zo súčastí systému a mala byť funkčná najneskôr 31. decembra 1999.
Cattle identification and registration systems were set up in the four Member States more than two years after the target date of 31 December 1999 and still have some weaknesses. 
Systém identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka, ktorý bol zavedený v štyroch členských štátoch s viac ako dvojročným oneskorením po stanovenom termíne, ktorým bol 31. december 1999, naďalej vykazuje určité nedostatky.
For example, the passports of animals traded between Member States are not monitored, there is no exchange of information between national databases, there are delays in updating the databases and the level of reliability of the information contained in the databases must often be considered inadequate. 
Napríklad pasy zvierat, s ktorými sa v rámci členských štátov obchoduje, nie sú monitorované, chýba výmena informácií medzi národnými databázami, databázy sú aktualizované s omeškaním a miera spoľahlivosti informácií obsiahnutých v databázach je často považovaná za nedostatočnú.
The main finding is that the cattle identification and registration system that was designed does not guarantee the traceability of intra-Community or extra-Community cattle movements. 
Dvor audítorov zistil, že navrhnutý systém identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka negarantuje sledovanie pohybu hovädzieho dobytka v rámci Spoločenstva ani mimo členských štátov.
These movements nevertheless involve approximately three million head of cattle per year (approximately 4 % of the herd). 
Tieto presuny sa každoročne týkajú približne 3 miliónov kusov hovädzieho dobytka (približne 4 % stáda).
V. The general framework of the system was laid down by the Parliament and the Council. 
V. Parlament a Rada vytvorili všeobecný rámec systému.
The Commission was given the task of implementing certain components of the system, but responsibility for implementing the system lies with the Member States. 
Komisia mala za úlohu implementovať niektoré prvky systému, ale za realizáciu systému zodpovedali členské štáty.
The legislation did not include procedures for Member States to exchange data on cattle movements and the exchange was in any case compromised by the fact that data format varies from one Member State to another. 
V právnych predpisoch neboli ustanovené postupy výmeny údajov o presunoch hovädzieho dobytka medzi členskými štátmi a táto výmena bola v skutočnosti kompromisom, pretože formáty údajov sa v jednotlivých členských štátoch nezhodujú.
All attempts to reconcile information from the various databases have failed. 
Všetky pokusy o zosúladenie informácií z rôznych databáz boli neúspešné.
The Member States interpreted certain elements of Community regulations in different ways, in respect of the deadlines for tagging and reporting, the fundamental concept of Ôkeeper of bovine animalsŐ and return of animal passports. 
Členské štáty interpretovali rôznymi spôsobmi niektoré ustanovenia právnych predpisov Spoločenstva týkajúce sa dodržiavania lehôt na značkovanie alebo registráciu zvierat, samotného pojmu „držiteľ hovädzieho dobytka“ alebo odovzdávania zvieracích pasov.
The Commission was not given responsibility for adopting implementing measures for setting up and checking the databases. 
Komisia nebola poverená prijatím vykonávacích opatrení týkajúcich sa zriadenia databáz a ich kontroly.
This explains, in part, the differences found between the Member States. 
Táto skutočnosť sčasti vysvetľuje zistené rozdiely medzi členskými štátmi.
The control and penalty systems in place have not been adapted to ensure that they are appropriate to the various keepers of cattle, such as traders, assembly centres or slaughterhouses. 
Zavedené kontrolné a sankčné mechanizmy nie sú prispôsobené držiteľom hovädzieho dobytka, ktorými sú obchodníci, zhromažďovacie strediská alebo bitúnky.
In addition, the databases contain certain data, such as retagging rates and delays in registration, which the Member States do not use as control instruments. Control practices also vary greatly from one Member State to another. 
Členské štáty ďalej nevyužívajú niektoré informácie obsiahnuté v databázach, napríklad oneskorené nahlasovanie alebo miera zaopatrenia zvierat nanovo vydaným ušným štítkom. Kontrolné postupy sú tiež v jednotlivých členských štátoch veľmi odlišné.
As far as checks on the implementation and monitoring of the cattle identification and registration system are concerned, the Commission has interpreted its own role in a restrictive manner and has given no guidance on the setting-up of the databases. 
Komisia si vyložila svoje vlastné postavenie pri kontrolách zavádzania a monitorovania systému identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka reštriktívnym spôsobom a nezabezpečila žiadne metodické vedenie pre vytváranie databáz.
No standardised management rules have been issued and no quality indicator has been developed as regards the operation of the databases. 
Nedošlo k vydaniu jednotných riadiacich predpisov, ani k vypracovaniu ukazovateľov kvality fungovania databáz.
The procedures for recognising the Ôfully operational characterŐ of the databases are unsatisfactory and the CommissionŐs role is too often limited to confirming the technical existence of the databases, without evaluating their actual operation on the basis of precise management rules or predefined quality indicators. 
Postupy na schválenie úplnej funkčnosti databáz sú neuspokojivé a úloha Komisie sa príliš často obmedzuje len na konštatovanie technickej existencie databáz bez toho, aby na základe presných riadiacich predpisov alebo vopred stanovených ukazovateľov kvality posúdila ich skutočnú funkčnosť.
The Commission should be given adequate resources to take on a genuine guiding role in the system, in particular by drawing up standardised management rules, quality indicators and a format for the exchange of data between national databases. 
Komisia by mala mať k dispozícii dostatočné zdroje, aby mohla v rámci systému plniť skutočnú riadiacu úlohu, a to predovšetkým prostredníctvom vypracovania jednotných riadiacich predpisov, ukazovateľov kvality, ako aj formátu pre výmenu údajov medzi národnými databázami.
The exchange of data between Member States, and even with third countries, should be organised with a view to retaining control over intra-Community and extra-Community movements. 
Výmena údajov medzi členskými štátmi a s tretími krajinami by mala prebiehať tak, aby bolo možné kontrolovať presuny v rámci Spoločenstva a mimo členských štátov.
C 29/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 IX. 
C 29/4 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 4.2.2005 IX.
The administrative checks applied in the various Member States should also be compared and specifications provided for cross-checks to be carried out between the identification and registration databases and the IACS databases before the various premiums are paid. 
Pred vyplatením akýchkoľvek prémií je taktiež potrebné porovnať administratívne kontroly vykonávané v jednotlivých členských štátoch a zadefinovať krížové kontroly medzi databázami systému identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka a integrovaného administratívneho a kontrolného systému (IACS).
The system of on-the-spot checks should also be reviewed, including the penalty mechanisms, and specific approaches for the different types of keepers of cattle should be drawn up and an approach imposed which is fully integrated with IACS. 
Ďalej je potrebné preveriť postup kontroly na mieste vrátane mechanizmu na udeľovanie sankcií, vypracovať špecifické prístupy pre každú kategóriu držiteľov hovädzieho dobytka a zaviesť prístup, ktorý je plne integrovaný s IACS.
INTRODUCTION General context 1. 
ÚVOD Všeobecný kontext 1.
The specific regulation concerning the identification and registration of bovine animals (1) (cattle), on the one hand, establishes a system for the identification and registration of cattle at the production stage and, on the other, creates a specific Community labelling system in the beef sector. 
Osobitné nariadenie týkajúce sa identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka (1) („cattle“) na jednej strane vytvára systém identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka vo fáze výroby a na druhej strane vytvára špecifický systém označovania v sektore hovädzieho dobytka.
These two systems are interdependent: the fact that cattle can be traced by means of the identification and registration system is a prerequisite for guaranteeing the safety of the food chain through the labelling system. 
Tieto dva systémy sú od seba navzájom zá-vislé: skutočnosť, že hovädzí dobytok možno pomocou systému identifikácie a registrácie vysledovať, je predpokladom zaručenia bezpečnosti potravinového reťazca pomocou systému označovania.
Veterinary and health reasons, and some of the requirements relating to the management of a number of Community animal premium schemes, all demand an efficient system of cattle identification and registration. 
Z veterinárnych a zdravotných dôvodov, ako aj na základe niektorých požiadaviek týkajúcich sa riadenia viacerých schém prémií za zviera, sa vyžaduje účinný systém identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka.
This report focuses on the cattle identification and registration system and does not deal with the labelling of the marketed products. 
Táto správa sa zameriava na systém identifikácie a registrácie a nezaoberá sa označovaním predávaných produktov.
The system comprises ear tags as a means of identifying individual animals, animal passports, individual registers kept on each holding and computerised databases set up by the Member States. 
Systém sa skladá z ušných štítkov ako prostriedku na identifikáciu jednotlivých zvierat, pasov zvieraťa, jednotlivých registrov vedených na každom hospodárstve a počítačových databáz, ktoré vytvorili členské štáty.
The computerised databases, which were to be set up by all Member States by 31 December 1999, are an important part of the system. 
Počítačové databázy, ktoré mali všetky členské štáty vybudovať do 31. decembra 1999, sú dôležitou súčasťou tohto systému.
They must contain all the data on all the movements of all cattle from birth through to slaughter. 
Musia obsahovať všetky údaje o všetkých pohyboch všetkého hovädzieho dobytka od narodenia až po porážku.
The computerised databases containing the cattle records were originally set up for veterinary purposes (2), but are also used by premium managers to carry out administrative checks in the (1) Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 July 2000 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 204, 11.8.2000, p. 
Počítačové databázy, obsahujúce záznamy o hovädzom dobytku, boli pôvodne vybudované na veterinárne účely (2), no používajú ich aj správcovia prémií pri administratívnych kontrolách v súvislosti s Integrovaným administratívnym a kontrolným (1) Nariadenie (ES) č.
(2) The preamble to Regulation (EC) No 820/97 of 21 April 1997 establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef and beef products (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997 p. 
820/97 z 21. apríla 1997 zavádza-júceho systém pre identifikáciu a registráciu hovädzieho dobytka a týkajúceho sa označovania hovädzieho mäsa a výrobkov z hovädzieho mäsa (Ú. v. ES L 117, 7.5.1997, s.
1) states, ÔWhereas Article 3(1)(c) of Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market states that animals for intra-Community trade must be identified in accordance with the requirements of Community rules and be registered in such a way that the original or transit holding, centre or organisation can be tracedŐ. context of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) (3). 
1 písm. c) smernice Rady 90/425/EHS z 26. júna 1990 týkajúci sa veterinárnych a zootechnických kontrol, ktoré sa majú uplatniť v obchode vnútri Spoločenstva u niektorých živých zvierat a výrobkov na účely dobudovania vnútorného trhu, uvádza, že zvieratá určené pre vnútorný trh Spoločenstva musia byť identifikované v súlade s predpísanými požiadavkami a registrované spôsobom, ktorý umožní spätne zistiť pôvodné alebo prechodné vlastníctvo, stredisko alebo or-ganizáciu.“ systémom (IACS) (3).
The cattle identification and registration system, and, especially, the computerised databases containing the cattle records, is thus an important component in the Integrated Administrative and Control System (IACS) for the efficient administration and control of bovine premiums (4). 
Systém identifikácie a registrácie hovädzieho dobytka, predovšetkým počítačové databázy obsahujúce záznamy o hovädzom dobytku, je preto dôležitou súčasťou IACS umožňujúcou účinnú správu a kontrolu prémií za hovädzí dobytok (4).
The CourtŐs audit 4. 
Audit Dvora audítorov 4.