natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements). 
Je rozdiel medzi čiastkami obsiahnutými v tabuľke 105 (pohľadávka, ktorá je istá a nie je predmetom nejakej podmienky, pohľadávka pevnej čiastky vyjadrenej presne v hotovosti, splatná pohľadávka, ktorá nie je predmetom žiadnej platobnej lehoty) na uplatnenie finančných nárokov EPUZF a čiastkami, ktoré figurujú v databáze ERP (čiastka štvrťročne hlásených porušení predpisov za určité obdobie, ktorá môže byť v danej fáze predmetom ďalších spresňujúcich úprav návrhu rozpočtu).
The Commission has asked the Member States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. 
Komisia požiadala členské štáty, aby vykonali experimentálne zosúladenie databázy ERP s údajmi tabuľky 105, majúc na pamäti, že tieto dve množiny údajov nebudú nikdy úplne súhlasiť.
Until now, the first priority was to improve the quality of the data. 
Dosiaľ bolo prvou prioritou zvýšenie kvality údajov.
The data in the ECR database has now reached a level of reliability where it will be possible to compare the data. 
Údaje databázy ERP dosiahli takú úroveň spoľahlivosti, že bude možné údaje porovnávať.
Member States should shift in the near future to the electronic format for reporting of irregularities. 
Členské štáty by v blízkej budúcnosti mali prejsť na elektronický formát správ o porušení predpisov.
The electronic format will increase the data quality and the on time reporting of irregularities and will avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretations. 
Elektronický formát zvýši kvalitu údajov, včasného spravodajstva o porušeniach predpisov a bude predchádzať nedorozumeniam a nesprávnym výkladom.
The Commission is currently assisting Member States in this respect and is also considering an increase of the threshold from EUR 4 000 to 10 000 in order to reduce dataflow and focus on the most important cases. 
Komisia v súčasnosti pomáha v tomto smere členským štátom a takisto zvažuje zvýšenie prahu zo 4 000 na 10 000 EUR so zámerom redukovať tok údajov a zamerať sa na najdôležitejšie prípady.
The Commission has undertaken to bring forward draft proposals to modify Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 and Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 to seek to remedy the weaknesses in reporting, recovery and write off of irregular CAP payments. 
Komisia podnikla kroky na predloženie návrhov na úpravu nariadenia Rady (EHS) č.
The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. Any decision to write off irrecoverable amounts has to be taken by the Commission via the EAGGF clearance-of-accounts procedure that is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, in which OLAF assists throughout its different steps. Finally, regarding the suggested abolition of the black list, the Commission, while sharing the view of the Court that the system does not work well, thinks there is room for improvement of the scheme and would rather see the application of the tool by the Member States being improved, than simply abolished. 
Komisia sa nazdáva, že rozdelenie právomocí medzi protikorupčným úradom OLAF a Generálnym riaditeľstvom pre poľnohospodárstvo bolo jasne definované: podľa prílohy 2 k správe Komisie SEC(95) 249 je protikorupčný úrad OLAF zodpovedný vo veciach vyrovnania ohlásených porušení predpisov. Každé rozhodnutie odpísať nedobytné čiastky musí prijať Komisia prostredníctvom procedúry vyrovnania účtov EPUZF, ktorú vykonáva Generálne riaditeľstvo pre poľnohospodárstvo a počas ktorej rôznych krokov vypomáha protikorupčný úrad OLAF. Na záver v úvahách o navrhovanom zrušení „čiernej listiny“ Komisia má na jednej strane rovnaký názor so Súdnym dvorom, že tento systém dobre nefunguje, no na druhej strane sa nazdáva, že je tu dosť priestoru na zlepšenie schémy, a dáva prednosť možnosti, že členské štáty zlepšia aplikáciu tohto nástroja pred jeho úplným zrušením.
There is certainly room for improvement, and the mere existence of the regulation is designed to have a preventive impact which, admittedly, diminishes if not effectively applied. 
Istotne jestvuje oblasť, ktorú treba zlepšiť, a sama existencia nariadenia je určená na to, aby malo nariadenie preventívny dosah, ktorý sa – a to treba pripustiť – zmenšuje, ak nie je účinne aplikovaný.
In this context, it is worth pointing out that clearance of accounts started to systematically include aspects regarding the application of the black list in its audits. 
V súvislosti s tým treba zdôrazniť, že vyrovnanie účtov začalo systematicky zahŕňať aspekty týkajúce sa aplikácie „čiernej listiny“ pri auditoch.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
4.11.2004 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2). 
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group „Irregularities and Mutual Assistance — Agricultural Products“ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2).
At the same time specific fields relating to ÔInterestŐ and ÔPenaltiesŐ were introduced. 
At the same time specific fields relating to „Inte-rest“ and „Penalties“ were introduced.
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the Ôfigures must be handled with great cautionŐ (p. 
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the „figures must be han-dled with great caution“ (p.
41) as Ôthere is no certainty that the total number of communications received represents the total frauds and irregularities detected by Member StatesŐ (p. 
41) as „there is no certainty that the total number of communications received represents the total frauds and irregularities detected by Member States“ (p.
C 269/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account. 
C 269/22 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account.
In its Communication COM(202) 671 final of 3 December 2002, the Commission recommended the initiation of corrective measures, namely: Ń setting up of the Task Force Recovery to speed up the treatment of the backlog, Ń modifying Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and therefore Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 to prevent new backlogs in the future. 
In its Communication COM(202) 671 final of 3 December 2002, the Commission recommended the initiation of corrective measures, namely: — setting up of the Task Force Recovery to speed up the treatment of the backlog, — modifying Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and therefore Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 to prevent new backlogs in the future.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law. 
4.11.2004 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law.
As regards the guiding principles: Ń if the whole amount cannot be recovered for objective reasons and the Member State has done all it can to recover the amount on time without displaying any negligence, the unrecovered amounts are charged to the Community budget. Ń in all other cases, where the irregularity is attributed to the Member State or where the recovery procedures have not been conducted with all the diligence required, the amounts in question are charged to defaulting Member States. The Commission has undertaken to bring forward pro- 
As regards the guiding principles: — if the whole amount cannot be recovered for objective reasons and the Member State has done all it can to recover the amount on time without displaying any negligence, the unre-covered amounts are charged to the Community budget. — in all other cases, where the irregularity is attributed to the Member State or where the recovery procedures have not The Commission has undertaken to bring forward pro-
C 269/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions. 
C 269/24 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions.
In the (1) Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom. year 2003 the first basic analyses on the basis of the data of ECR database have been presented to Member States in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
The related clearance-of-accounts procedure for the bulk of examined files is ongoing. year 2003 the first basic analyses on the basis of the data of ECR database have been presented to Member States in the framework of the Working Group „Irregularities and Mutual Assistance — Agricultural Products“.
The Commission has asked Member States to update these cases during the Article 280 Working Group meeting of 12 March 2003 and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ of 11 March 2003 (see paragraph 25). 
The Commission has asked Member States to update these cases the during Article 280 Working Group meeting of 12 March 2003 and Working Group „Irregularities and Mutual Assistance — Agricultural Products“ of 11 March 2003 (see paragraph 25).
Among the difficulties put forward by Member States are: Ń the concept of Ôserious negligenceŐ is a legal concept unknown in certain Member States in civil law, having in some Member States more affinity with the criminal process, Ń the absence of an explicit clause which regulates liability in the case of a consortium or associated operators, Ń the risk of having to pay for damages for a blacklisting that was ultimately overturned, which could have serious financial consequences for the Member State involved. 
Among the difficulties put forward by Member States are: — the concept of „serious negligence“ is a legal concept unknown in certain Member States in civil law, having in some Member States more affinity with the criminal process, — the absence of an explicit clause which regulates liability in the case of a consortium or associated operators, — the risk of having to pay for damages for a blacklisting that was ultimately overturned, which could have serious financial consequences for the Member State involved.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/25 66. and 67. 
4.11.2004 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 269/25 66. and 67.
It is not excluded that some Member States already ÔanticipateŐ these recommendations and take them for granted. 
It is not excluded that some Member States already „anticipate“ these recommendations and take them for granted.
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements). 
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements).
In 2000, on the initiative of the Commission and based on the same observations as the Court, proposals were discussed with Member States to remedy the situation of the ÔpendingŐ cases. 
In 2000, on the initiative of the Commission and based on the same observations as the Court, proposals were discussed with Member States to remedy the situation of the „pending“ cases.
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action. 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group „Irregularities and Mutual Assistance — Agricultural Products“ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing a comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action.
C 269/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures. 
C 269/26 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie 4.11.2004 Commission estimates that, in undertaking its tasks, it should primarily focus on the appraisal of the efficiency and adequacy of adopted and executed measures.
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action (see also answer in paragraph IX). 
The Commission has extensively discussed the application of the Black List in the framework of the Working Group „Irregularities and Mutual Assistance — Agricultural Products“ and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the black list Regulation and suggested options for action (see also answer in paragraph IX).
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 4/2004 on the programming of the Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation Đ Interreg III, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph of the EC Treaty) (2004/C 303/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
7.12.2004 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 303/1 I (Informácie) DVOR AUDÍTOROV OSOBITNÁ SPRÁVA č. 4/2004 týkajúca sa programovania iniciatívy Spoločenstva pre transeurópsku spoluprácu Interreg III, spolu s odpoveďami Komisie (predložená v zmysle druhého pododseku článku 248 ods. 4 Zmluvy o založení ES) (2004/C 303/01) OBSAH ZHRNUTIE ................................................................
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
Obsahujúpokynyšpecifickémerateľnécieleacieľovéopatrenia?...................
Context ............................................................... MainfeaturesoftheInitiativefortheperiod2000to2006....................... 
Cieleaukazovatele ..................................................
TheCourtŐsaudit........................................................ 
Stanoveniecieľovýchopatrení .........................................
THECOMMISSIONGUIDELINES ............................................... 
Boli členským štátom včas poskytnuté pokyny a metodické dokumenty? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Objectivesandindicators ............................................. 
Boli zohľadnené výsledky predchádzajúceho programovacieho obdobia? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Aretheeligibleareasclearlydefined? ........................................ 
Zodpovedajúzistenépotrebyprioritámprogramov? ............................
Areprogrammeprioritiessynonymouswithidentifiedneeds?..................... Is there complementarity between the Interreg III CIPs and traditional ERDF interven-tions?................................................................. 
Doplňujú sa vzájomne jednotlivé PIS iniciatívy Interreg III a tradičné opatrenia programu EFRR? ................................................................
Do the first projects adopted qualify as trans-European and do they offer added value? 
Majú prvé schválené projekty transeurópsky charakter a zvyšujú pridanú hodnotu?
Aretheobjectivesmeasurableandquantified? ................................. CONCLUSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... Conclusion ............................................................ 
Súcieleprogramovsprávneštrukturované? ................................... Súcielemerateľnéakvantifikovateľné? .......................................
TheprocedureforexaminingCIPproposalsmustbeimproved................ Preparation and the start of implementation are generally characterised by coopera-tion.............................................................. 
Dostupné nástroje na meranie dosahu PIS sú vzhľadom na ich ciele nedostatočné Odporúčania...........................................................
97-99 17 7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/3 CI CIP EEIG ERDF ESDP JTS Managing authority Monitoring committee NUTS Objective 1 Objective 2 Paying authority ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY Community Initiative. 
7.12.2004 SK Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 303/3 IS PIS EZHZ EFRR EKÚZ STS Riadiaci orgán Monitorovací výbor NUTS Cieľ 1 Cieľ 2 Platobný orgán ZOZNAM SKRATIEK A GLOSÁR Iniciatíva Spoločenstva.
One form of Structural Fund intervention, alongside operational programmes, technical assistance and innovative actions. 
Jedna z foriem zásahu štrukturálneho fondu spolu s prevádzkovými programami, technickou pomocou a inovačnými akciami.
There are four CIs: Interreg, Urban, Leader and Equal. 
Existujú štyri iniciatívy Spoločenstva: Interreg, Urban, Leader a Equal.
Community Initiative programme. 
Program iniciatívy Spoločenstva.
European Economic Interest Grouping. 
Európske zoskupenie hospodárskych záujmov.
EEIGs are legal instruments established under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2137/85 of 25 July 1985 (OJ L 199, 31.7.1985, p. 
Európske zoskupenie hospodárskych záujmov je právnym nástrojom vytvoreným nariadením Rady (EHS) č. 2137/85 z 25. júla 1985 (Ú. v.
1) to permit legal entities and natural persons from different Member States to form legal groupings. 
1), umožňujúcim právnickým a fyzickým osobám z rôznych členských štátov vytvárať právne zoskupenia.
European Regional Development Fund European Spatial Development Perspective. 
Európsky fond regionálneho rozvoja.
A discretionary and non-binding intergovernmental document adopted in Potsdam in May 1999 by the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning. 
Dobrovoľný nezáväzný medzivládny dokument. Prijala ho Neformálna rada ministrov zodpovedných za územné plánovanie v Postupime v máji 1999.
It is a policy framework that was adopted to improve cooperation between Community sectoral policies with significant spatial impacts. 
Ide o koncepčný rámec, ktorý bol prijatý v záujme zlepšenia spolupráce medzi odvetvovými koncepciami Spoločenstva s významným územným dosahom.
Joint technical secretariat. 
Spojený technický sekretariát.
This body assists the managing authority in the exercise of its duties. 
Tento orgán pomáha riadiacemu orgánu pri výkone jeho povinností.
An authority or body designated to manage an intervention programme. 
Orgán alebo útvar určený na riadenie intervenčného programu.
It is responsible, on the one hand, for the efficiency and correctness of management and, on the other hand, for implementation (receiving, examining and evaluating proposed operations, gathering data, drawing up the annual report, organising the mid-term evaluation, etc.). 
Na jednej strane je zodpovedný za efektívnosť a správnosť riadenia a na druhej strane za realizáciu programu (prijímanie, preskúmanie a vyhodnocovanie návrhov operácií, zber údajov, vydávanie výročných správ, organizovanie strednodobého vyhodnocovania atď.).
Body appointed for each programme by the Member States concerned. 
Orgán, ktorý pre každý program menovali príslušné členské štáty.
It is responsible for checking how assistance is being managed by the managing authority, ensuring compliance with the programme priorities and implementing rules and reviewing the programme evaluation. 
Je zodpovedný za kontrolu spôsobu spravovania pomoci riadiacim orgánom, za zabezpečenie dodržiavania programu priorít, zavádzanie predpisov a revidovanie vyhodnotenia programu.
Nomenclature of Statistical Territorial Units, which divides each Member State into a hierarchy of regions (NUTS level I). 
Nomenclature of Statistical Territorial Units – Nomenklatúra teritoriálnych jednotiek pre štatistiku. Každý členský štát je rozdelený do hierarchickej sústavy regiónov (úroveň NUTS I).
These are then subdivided into NUTS level II regions, which are again sub-divided into NUTS level III. 
Tieto regióny sa ďalej delia na regióny úrovne NUTS II a tie potom na regióny úrovne NUTS III.
The territory of the European Union comprises 78 regions at level I, 210 regions at level II and 1 093 at level III. 
Územie Európskej únie sa skladá zo 78 regiónov na úrovni I, 210 regiónov na úrovni II a 1 093 regiónov na úrovni III.
One of the three priority objectives of the Structural Funds. 
Jeden z troch prioritných cieľov štrukturálnych fondov.
It seeks to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind. 
Je zameraný na podporu rozvoja a úpravu štruktúry regiónov, ktorých rozvoj zaostáva.
As a rule, all the Funds contribute to programmes targeting these regions. 
Na programy zamerané na tieto regióny prispievajú spravidla všetky fondy.
It seeks to support the economic and social conversion of areas facing structural difficulties. 
Je zameraný na podporu hospodárskej a sociálnej konverzie oblastí, ktoré čelia štrukturálnym ťažkostiam.
Only the ERDF and the European Social Fund (ESF) contribute under this objective. 
Na tento cieľ prispieva len Európsky fond regionálneho rozvoja a Európsky sociálny fond.
An authority or body designated for the purposes of drawing up and submitting payment applications and receiving payments from the Commission. 
Orgán alebo útvar založený s tým cieľom, aby pripravoval a predkladal žiadosti o platby a aby prijímal od Komisie platby.
SFs Structural Funds 
ŠF Štrukturálne fondy.