natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is exemplified by the fact that, although in 2010 their share of the overall number of airports amounted to 77 %, publicly owned airports accounted for only 52 % of total passenger traffic.
Konkrétne ak je pomoc určená na základe výpočtov ex post (s vyrovnaním akýchkoľvek deficitov, ktoré priebežne vzniknú), letiská nemusia mať dostatočnú motiváciu na udržiavanie nákladov na nízkej úrovni a účtovanie takých letiskových poplatkov, ktoré sú dostatočné na pokrytie nákladov.
As shown in 2002 by the ‘Study on competition between airports and the application of State aid rules’ — Cranfield University, June 2002, and subsequently confirmed by industry reports.
Oznámenie Komisie Európskemu parlamentu, Rade, Európskemu hospodárskemu a sociálnemu výboru a Výboru regiónov o modernizácii štátnej pomoci EÚ (MŠP), COM(2012) 209 final.
13 airports in the Union are forecasted to be operating at full capacity 8 hours a day every day of the year in 2030, compared to 2007 when only 5 airports were operating at or near capacity 100 % of the time (see communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Airport policy in the European Union — addressing capacity and quality to promote growth, connectivity and sustainable mobility of 1 December 2011, COM(2011) 823) (‘the communication on Airport policy in the European Union’).
Pozri oznámenie o politike v oblasti letísk v Európskej únii.
As evidenced by the International Civil Aviation Organisation's policies on charges for airports and navigation services (Document 9082), last revised in April 2012.
Financovanie letísk a štátnej pomoci na začatie činnosti pre letecké spoločnosti s odletom z regionálnych letísk (Ú. v. EÚ L 62, 6.3.2008, s. 30 a dodatok EHP č. 12, 6.3.2008, s. 3).
In particular, where aid is determined on the basis of ex post calculations (making good for any deficits as they arise), airports may not have much incentive to contain costs and charge airport charges that are sufficient to cover costs.
Kapitola usmernení Dozorného úradu EZVO o štátnej pomoci týkajúcej sa štátnej pomoci sektoru letectva (Ú. v. ES L 124, 23.5.1996, s. 41 a dodatok EHP č. 23, 23.5.1996, s. 83) odkazuje na usmernenia Spoločenstva týkajúce sa uplatňovania článkov 92 a 93 Zmluvy o ES a článku 61 Dohody o EHP na štátnu pomoc v sektore letectva a uvádza, že dozorný úrad bude uplatňovať kritériá zodpovedajúce kritériám, ktoré sa nachádzajú v usmerneniach Komisie.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on EU State aid Modernisation (SAM), COM(2012) 209 final.
Zásady stanovené v týchto usmerneniach sa nevzťahujú na poskytovanie služieb pozemnej obsluhy, a to bez ohľadu na to, či ich poskytuje samotné letisko, letecká spoločnosť alebo dodávateľ služieb pozemnej obsluhy tretím stranám; Takáto pomoc sa bude posudzovať na základe príslušných všeobecných pravidiel.
See the communication on Airport policy in the European Union.
Podľa smernice Rady 96/67/ES z 15. októbra 1996 o prístupe k trhu služieb pozemnej obsluhy na letiskách Spoločenstva (Ú. v. ES L 272, 25.10.1996, s. 36), začlenenej do bodu 64c prílohy XIII k Dohode o EHP rozhodnutím Spoločného výboru č. 79/2000 z 2. októbra 2000 (Ú. v. ES L 315, 14.12.2000, s. 20 a dodatok EHP č. 59, 14.12.2000, s. 18), alebo akýchkoľvek ďalších právnych predpisov o prístupe k trhu služieb pozemnej obsluhy na letiskách EHP, sú letiská, ktoré vykonávajú pozemnú obsluhu, povinné viesť osobitné účtovníctvo s činnostiach týkajúcich sa pozemnej obsluhy a ostatných činnostiach.
Financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (OJ L 62, 6.3.2008, p. 30 and EEA Supplement No 12, 6.3.2008, p. 3).
Letiská navyše nemôžu dotovať činnosti pozemnej obsluhy z príjmov, ktoré získajú zo svojich letiskových činností.
The Chapter of the EFTA Surveillance Authority State aid Guidelines on aid to the aviation sector (OJ L 124, 23.5.1996, p. 41 and EEA Supplement No 23, 23.5.1996, p. 83) refers to the Community guidelines on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement to State aid in the aviation sector and states that the Authority will apply criteria corresponding to those found in the Commission guidelines.
Tieto usmernenia sa neuplatňujú ani na podniky, ktoré napriek svojej aktivite na letisku vykonávajú neletecké činnosti.
The principles set out in these guidelines do not apply to aid for the provision of ground handling services regardless of whether they are provided by the airport itself, by an airline or by a supplier of ground handling services to third parties; such aid will be assessed on the basis of the relevant general rules.
Predovšetkým, nie však výhradne, nariadenie (ES) č. 1008/2008 Európskeho parlamentu a Rady z 24. septembra 2008 o spoločných pravidlách prevádzky leteckých dopravných služieb v Spoločenstve (Ú. v. EÚ L 293, 31.10.2008, s. 3) začlenené do bodu 64a prílohy XIII k Dohode o EHP rozhodnutím Spoločného výboru č. 90/2011 z 19. júla 2011 (Ú. v. EÚ L 262, 6.10.2011, s. 62 a dodatok EHP č. 54, 6.10.2011, s. 78), smernica 96/67/ES, smernica 2009/12/ES Európskeho parlamentu a Rady z 11. marca 2009 o letiskových poplatkoch (Ú. v. EÚ L 70, 14.3.2009, s. 11) začlenená do bodu 65a prílohy XIII k Dohode o EHP rozhodnutím Spoločného výboru č. 64/2012 z 30. marca 2012 (Ú. v. EÚ L 207, 2.8.2012, s. 44 a dodatok EHP č. 43, 2.8.2012, s. 54) a akékoľvek ďalšie právne predpisy o letiskových poplatkoch.
Pursuant to Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the ground handling market at Community airports (OJ L 272, 25.10.1996, p. 36), incorporated into point 64c of Annex XIII of the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 79/2000 of 2 October 2000 (OJ L 315, 14.12.2000, p. 20 and EEA Supplement No 59, 14.12.2000, p. 18), or any subsequent legislation on access to the ground handling market at EEA's airports, airports that carry out ground handling are required to keep separate accounts of their ground handling activities and other activities.
Usmernenia pre národnú regionálnu pomoc na roky 2007 – 2013 (Ú. v. EÚ L 54, 28.2.2008, s. 1 a dodatok EHP č. 11, 28.2.2008, s. 1).
Moreover, an airport may not subsidise its ground handling activities from the revenue it derives from its airport activities.
Usmernenia o regionálnej štátnej pomoci na roky 2020 – 2014 (zatiaľ nezačlenené do Dohody o EHP).
These guidelines also do not apply to undertakings which, though active at an airport, are engaged in non-aeronautical activities.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1008/2008 z 24. septembra 2008 o spoločných pravidlách prevádzky leteckých dopravných služieb v Spoločenstve (Ú. v. EÚ L 293, 31.10.2008, s. 3).
Notably, but not exclusively, Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3), incorporated into point 64a of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 90/2011 of 19 July 2011 (OJ L 262, 6.10.2011, p. 62 and EEA Supplement No 54, 6.10.2011, p. 78), Directive 96/67/EC, Directive 2009/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on airport charges (OJ L 70, 14.3.2009, p. 11), incorporated into point 65a of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 64/2012 of 30 March 2012 (OJ L 207, 2.8.2012, p. 44 and EEA Supplement No 43, 2.8.2012, p. 54), and any subsequent legislation on airport charges.
Pozri Uplatňovanie pravidiel štátnej pomoci na náhrady za služby všeobecného hospodárskeho záujmu ( Ú. v. EÚ L 161, 13.6.2013, s. 12 a dodatok EHP č. 34, 13.6.2013, s. 1), časť 2.1 a súvisiaca judikatúra, obzvlášť spojené veci C-180/98 až C-184/98 Pavlov a i., Zb.
Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (OJ L 54, 28.2.2008, p. 1 and EEA Supplement No 11, 28.2.2008, p. 1).
2000, s.
Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 (not yet incorporated to the EEA Agreement).
I–6451.
Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3).
Vec 118/85 Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
See Application of the State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (OJ L 161, 13.6.2013, p. 12, and EEA Supplement No 34, 13.6.2013, p. 1) Part 2.1 and associated case law, in particular joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others, [2000] ECR I-6451.
1987, s. 2599, bod 7; vec C-35/96 Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7; Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy, [1998] ECR I-3851, paragraph 36; Pavlov and Others, paragraph 75.
1998, s.
Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, [1980] ECR 3125, paragraph 88; Case C-244/94 FFSA and Others, [1995] ECR I-4013, paragraph 21; and Case C-49/07 MOTOE, [2008] ECR I-4863, paragraphs 27 and 28.
I-3851, bod 36; Pavlov a iní., bod 75.
Case T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris v Commission, [2000] ECR II-3929, confirmed by Case C-82/01, [2002] ECR I-9297, paragraphs 75-79.
Spojené veci 209/78 až 215/78 a 218/78 Van Landewyck, Zb.
Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission, (‘Leipzig-Halle airport’ judgment), [2011] ECR II-1311, in particular paragraphs 93 and 94; confirmed by Case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v Commission, [2012] not yet reported.
1980, s. 3125, bod 88; vec C-244/94 FFSA a iní, Zb.
See point 3, and Leipzig-Halle airport judgment, paragraph 105.
1995, s.
See Leipzig-Halle airport judgment, paragraph 106.
I–4013, bod 21 a vec C-49/07 MOTOE, Zb.
The relevant criterion for the date at which a possible aid measure is deemed to have been granted is the date of the legally binding act by which public authorities undertake to award the measure at stake to its beneficiary.
2008, s.
See Case T-358/94 Compagnie Nationale Air France v Commission, [1996] ECR II-2109, paragraph 79, Case T-109/01, Fleuren Compost BV v Commission, [2004] ECR II-127, paragraph 74 and Joined Cases T-362/05 and T-363/05 Nuova Agricast v Commission, [2008] ECR II-297, paragraph 80, and Joined Cases T-427/04 and T-17/05, France and France Télécom v Commission, [2009] ECR II-4315, paragraph 321.
I–4863, body 27 a 28.
Decision C 38/2008 of 3 October 2012 on Munich airport Terminal 2 (OJ L 319, 29.11.2013, p. 8), paragraphs 74 to 81.
Vec T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
See Directive 2009/12/EC, recital 1.
2000, s.
The airport may or may not be the same entity that owns the airport.
II-3929, potvrdené vecou C-82/01, Zb.
The joint exercise of an economic activity is normally assessed by analysing the existence of functional, economic and organic links between the entities.
2002, s.
See, for instance, Case C-480/09 P AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA v Commission, [2010] ECR I-13355, paragraphs 47 to 55; Case C-222/04 Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others, [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 112.
I-9297, body 75 – 79.
Case T-196/04 Ryanair Ltd v Commission, [2008] ECR II-3643 (‘Charleroi’ judgment), paragraph 88.
Spojené veci T-443/08 a T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG a Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH/Komisia, (rozsudok vo veci „letisko Lipsko-Halle“), Zb.
Leipzig-Halle airport judgment, paragraph 98.
2011, s.
Case C-118/85 Commission v Italy, [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8, and Case C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, [1988] ECR 2479, paragraph 18.
II-1311, najmä body 93 a 94; potvrdené vecou C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen a Flughafen Leipzig-Halle/Komisia, [2012], zatiaľ neuverejnené.
See, in particular, Case C-364/92 SAT/Eurocontrol, [1994] ECR I-43, paragraph 30 and Case C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati v Commission, [2009] ECR I-2207, paragraph 71.
Pozri bod 3, a rozsudok vo veci letiska Lipsko-Halle, bod 105.
Case C-343/95 Cali & Figli v Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, [1997] ECR I-1547.
Pozri rozsudok vo veci letiska Lipsko-Halle, bod 106.
Commission Decision N 309/2002 of 19 March 2003, Aviation security — compensation for costs incurred following the attacks of 11 September 2001 (OJ C 148, 25.6.2003, p. 7).
Príslušné kritérium pre dátum, pri ktorom sa možné opatrenie pomoci považuje za poskytnuté, je dátum právne záväzného aktu, ktorým sa verejné orgány zaväzujú poskytnúť príslušné opatrenie svojmu príjemcovi.
Commission Decision N 438/2002 of 16 October 2002, Aid in support of public authority functions in the port sector (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002, p. 2).
Pozri vec T-358/94 Compagnie Nationale Air France/Komisia, Zb.
See, among others, Case C-172/03 Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck, [2005] ECR I-01627, paragraph 36, and case-law cited in that judgment.
1996, s.
See also, Case E-9/12 Iceland v ESA, judgment of the EFTA Court of 22 July 2013, paragraph 54.
II-2109, bod 79, vec T-109/01, Fleuren Compost BV/Komisia, Zb.
See Decision N 324/2006 of 24 October 2006 — France, Aid in support of the charter of an ATR 72-500 by Air Caraïbes (OJ C 300, 9.12.2006, p. 10).
2004, s.
See Case C-126/01 Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie v GEMO SA [2003] ECR I-13769, paragraph 29.
II-127, bod 74 a spojené veci T-362/05 a T-363/05 Nuova Agricast/Komisia, Zb.
Resources of a public undertaking constitute State resources within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty because the public authorities control these resources.
2008, s.
See Case C-482/99 France v Commission, [2002] ECR I-4397 (‘Stardust Marine’ judgment).
II-297, bod 80, a spojené veci T-427/04 a T-17/05, Francúzsko a France Télécom/Komisia, Zb.
The Court has confirmed that once financial means remain constantly under public control and are therefore available to the competent national authorities, this is sufficient for them to be categorised as State aid, see Case C-83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing Ltd and Commission, [2000] ECR I-3271, paragraph 50.
2009, s.
See Stardust Marine judgment, paragraph 52.
II-4315, bod 321.
See Stardust Marine judgement, paragraphs 55 and 56.
Rozhodnutie C 38/2008 z 3. októbra 2012 o termináli 2 mníchovského letiska, (Ú. v. EÚ L 319, 29.11.2013, s. 8), body 74 – 81.
Case 78/76, Steinike & Weinlig v Germany, [1977] ECR 595, paragraph 21.
Pozri smernicu 2009/12/ES, odôvodnenie 1.
Case C-310/99, Italy v Commission, [2002] ECR-I-2289, paragraph 65.
Prevádzkovateľ letiska môže, ale nemusí byť ten istý subjekt, ktorý letisko vlastní.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (‘Altmark’ judgment), [2003] ECR I-7747.
Spoločné vykonávanie hospodárskej činnosti sa zvyčajne posudzuje analyzovaním existencie funkčných, hospodárskych a organických väzieb medzi subjektmi.
See Altmark judgment, paragraphs 77 to 82.
Pozri napríklad vec C-480/09 P AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA/Komisia, Zb.
Stardust Marine judgment, paragraph 71.
2010, s I-13355, body 47 – 55; vec C-222/04 Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze/Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a iní, Zb.
Case C-124/10P European Commission v EDF, [2012], not yet reported, paragraphs 84, 85 and 105.
2006, s.
Cases T-129/95, T-2/96 and T-97/96 Neue Maxhütte Stahlwerke and Lech Stahlwerke v Commission, [1999] ECR II-17, paragraph 120.
I–289, bod 112.
See also case C-40/85, Belgium v Commission, [1986] ECR 02321, paragraph 13.
Vec T-196/04 Ryanair Ltd./Komisia, Zb.
Stardust Marine judgment, paragraph 69.
2008, s.
See also Case C-303/88 Italy v Commission, [1991] ECR I-1433, paragraph 20.
II–3643 (rozsudok „Charleroi“), bod 88.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission (‘ALFA Romeo’ judgment), [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 20.
Rozsudok vo veci letiska Lipsko-Halle, bod 98.
Case T-228/99 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Commission, [2003] ECR II-435, paragraph 250-270.
Vec C-118/85 Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
See Commission Decision in Case C 25/2007 — Finland — Tampere Pirkkala airport and Ryanair (OJ L 309, 19.11.2013, p. 27).
1987 s 2599, body 7 a 8 a vec C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, Zb.
Case C-124/10 P Commission v EDF [2012], not yet reported, paragraphs 84, 85 and 105.
1988, s. 2479, bod 18.
See also case C-40/85 Belgium v Commission, [1986] ECR 02321, paragraph 13.
Pozri najmä vec C-364/92 SAT/Eurocontrol, Zb.
Relevant provisions include Articles 53 and 54 of the EEA Agreement, and Directive 2009/12/EC.
1994, s.
See Commission Decision in Case C 12/2008 — Slovakia — Agreement between Bratislava Airport and Ryanair (OJ L 27, 1.2.2011, p. 24), and Commission Decision in Case C 25/2007 — Finland — Tampere Pirkkala airport and Ryanair (OJ L 309, 19.11.2013, p. 27).
I–43, bod 30 a vec C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati/Komisia, Zb.
A reasonable profit margin is a ‘normal’ rate of return on capital, that is to say, a rate of return that would be required by a typical company for an investment of similar risk.
2009, s.
The return is measured as an internal rate of return ( ‘IRR’) over the envisaged cash flows induced by the arrangement with the airline.
I–2207, bod 71.
This does not preclude foreseeing that future benefits over the duration of the arrangements may offset initial losses.
Vec C-343/95 Cali & Figli/Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, Zb.
Any public support, such as for example marketing agreements directly concluded between public authorities and the airline, designed to offset part of the normal costs incurred by the airport in relation to the airport/airline arrangement will likewise be taken into account.
1997, s.
This is irrespective of whether such support is directly granted to the airline concerned, or channelled through the airport or another entity.
I-1547.
Charleroi judgment, paragraph 59.
Rozhodnutie Komisie N 309/2002 z 19. marca 2003, letecká bezpečnosť – náhrada nákladov vzniknutých v súvislosti s útokmi z 11. septembra 2001, (Ú. v. EÚ C 148, 25.6.2003, s. 7).
What is said in this paragraph about airlines applies in the same way to other users of the airport.
Rozhodnutie Komisie N 438/2002 zo 16. októbra 2002, pomoc orgánom verejnej správy v sektore prístavov, (Ú. v. ES C 284, 21.11.2002, s. 2).
See notably joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission, [2011] ECR II-1311, paragraph 109.
Pozri okrem iného vec C-172/03 Wolfgang Heiser/Finanzamt Innsbruck, Zb.
See Altmark judgment, paragraphs 86 to 93.
2005, s.
Public funding for the provision of an SGEI does not entail a selective advantage within the meaning of Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement if the following four conditions are met: (a) the beneficiary of a State funding mechanism for an SGEI must be formally entrusted with the provision and discharge of an SGEI, the obligations of which must be clearly defined (b) the parameters for calculating the compensation must be established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner; (c) the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of the SGEI, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations and (d) where the beneficiary is not chosen pursuant to a public procurement procedure, that allows for the provision of the service at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation granted must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit.
I–01627, bod 36 a judikatúru citovanú v tomto rozsudku.
See footnote 21.
Pozri aj vec E-9/12 Island/ESA, rozsudok Súdu EZVO z 22. júla 2013, bod 54.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 360/2012 of 25 April 2012 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to de minimis aid granted to undertakings providing services of general economic interest (OJ L 114, 26.4.2012, p. 8), incorporarted into point 1ha of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 225/2012 of 7 December 2012 (OJ L 81, 21.3.2013, p. 27 and EEA Supplement No 18, 21.3.2013, p. 32),
Pozri rozhodnutie N 324/2006 z 24. októbra 2006 – Francúzsko, pomoc na podporu nájomných lietadiel typu ATR 72-500 spoločnosťou Air Caraïbes, (Ú. v. EÚ C 300, 9.12.2006, s. 10).
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3), incorporarted into point 1h of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement by Joint Committee Decision No 66/2012 of 30 March 2012 (OJ L 207, 2.8.2012, p. 46 and EEA Supplement No 43, 2.8.2012, p. 56).
Pozri vec C-126/01 Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie/GEMO SA, Zb.
Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (OJ L 161, 13.6.2013, p. 12 and EEA Supplement No 34, 13.6.2013, p. 1).
2003, s.
Case T-289/03 British United Provident Association Ltd (BUPA) v Commission [2008], ECR II-81, paragraphs 171 and 224.
I-13769, bod 29.
See Joined Cases T-204/97 and T-270/97 EPAC — Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA v Commission [2000] ECR II-2267, paragraph 126 and Case T-17/02 Fred Olsen, SA v Commission [2005] ECR II-2031, paragraphs 186, 188-189.
Prostriedky verejného podniku predstavujú štátne prostriedky v zmysle článku 107 ods. 1 zmluvy, lebo ich kontrolujú verejné orgány.
See SGEI Communication, paragraph 45.
Pozri vec C-482/99 Francúzsko/Komisia, Zb.
See decision N 381/04 — France, Project for a high capacity telecommunications network in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques (DORSAL) (OJ C 162, 2.7.2005, p. 5).
2002, s.
Articles 16, 17 and 18.
I–4397 (rozsudok vo veci „Stardust Marine“).
Both origin and destination airports must be clearly identified see Article 16(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008.
Súdny dvor potvrdil, že keď finančné prostriedky nepretržite ostávajú pod verejnou kontrolou, a teda sú k dispozícii príslušným vnútroštátnym orgánom, postačuje to na to, aby boli kategorizované ako štátna pomoc, pozri vec C-83/98 P France/Ladbroke Racing Ltd a Komisia, Zb.
In particular, the Authority considers that it would be difficult to justify PSOs on a route to a given airport if there are already similar services notably in terms of transport time, frequencies, level and quality of service, to another airport serving the same catchment area.
2000, s.
See point 70 and Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008, recital 12 and articles 16 to 18.
I–3271, bod 50.
This threshold refers to a one-way count, that is to say, a passenger flying from the airport and back to the airport would be counted twice.
Pozri rozsudok vo veci „Stardust Marine“, bod 52.
If an airport is part of a group of airports, the passenger volume is established on the basis of each individual airport.
Pozri rozsudok vo veci „Stardust Marine“, body 55 a 56.
This threshold refers to a one-way count, that is to say, a passenger flying to the island and back would be counted twice.
(Vec 78/76, Steinike & Weinlig/Nemecko, Zb.
It applies to individual routes between an airport on the island and an airport on the mainland.
1977, s.
See for instance Case C-156/98 Germany v Commission [2000] ECR I-6857, paragraph 78 and Case C-333/07 Régie Networks v Rhone Alpes Bourgogne [2008] ECR I-10807, paragraphs 94–116.
I–595, bod 21.
See Case C-225/91 Matra v Commission, [1993] ECR I-3203, paragraph 42.
Vec C-310/99, Taliansko/Komisia, Zb.
Between 70 % and 90 % of the airport's costs are fixed.
2002, s.
The categories of airports for the purposes of these guidelines are based on the available industry data.
I–2289, bod 65.
This does not preclude foreseeing that future benefits may offset initial losses.
Vec C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH a Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg/Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (rozsudok vo veci „Altmark“), Zb.