natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Points out that the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defines biodiversity as variability among living organisms from all sources including terrestrial, marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; points out, further, that the CBD recognises several major threats to biodiversity such as loss and fragmentation of habitats, overexploitation of forests, oceans, rivers, lakes and soils, pollution, climate change, and incoming species that compete with native flora and fauna;
víta skutočnosť, že partnerské krajiny môžu od mája 2013 kedykoľvek navrhovať projekty, čo podporuje schopnosť reagovať na vznikajúce sa hrozby;
Emphasises that biodiversity is essential for human life and for the wellbeing of societies; emphasises, furthermore, that climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the threats posed by invasive species and the overconsumption of natural resources are major challenges affecting every Union citizen;
konštatuje, že oneskorenie medzi návrhom projektu a jeho následným schválením a vykonaním by sa malo ešte viac skrátiť;
Regrets that the Union has been unable to meet its headline target of curbing biodiversity loss in the Union by 2010;
zdôrazňuje, že je potrebná širšia strategická spolupráca v záujme zlepšenia súladu a koordinácie rôznych nástrojov financovania v oblasti bezpečnosti; zdôrazňuje, že posilnená koordinácia medzi príslušnými aktérmi v oblasti CBRN zvýši účinnosť súčasných iniciatív;
Notes that economically speaking, the loss of biodiversity is enormously costly to society and that not enough attention has yet been paid to this in global policies; notes, furthermore, that the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity study estimates that the cost of inaction and the deterioration of ecosystem services could amount to as much as 7 % of global GDP per year by 2050 [20];
domnieva sa, že iniciatíve by mohlo prospieť jasnejšie rozlišovanie medzi vnútorným a vonkajším rozmerom činnosti v oblasti CBRN [22];
Is convinced that there is, therefore, an urgent need to act and attach greater political importance to biodiversity in order to meet the relevant commitments for 2020;
Časť XXIV
Notes that project outcomes often take a long time to materialise, which makes the assessment of those outcomes difficult;
Osobitná správa Dvora audítorov č. 19/2014 s názvom Predvstupová pomoc EÚ pre Srbsko
Takes the view that despite the limitations relating to the low level of funding allocated to biodiversity and to the difficulties involved in assessing the way in which such funding is used, it is essential to maintain the funding at this stage;
vyzýva srbské orgány, aby zlepšili kvalitu národných stratégií a akčných plánov a aby ich zracionalizovali a aby sa zodpovedajúcim spôsobom zamerali na riešenie rôznych politických a sociálnoekonomických problémov; vyzýva Komisiu, aby bola v tejto súvislosti v prípade potreby k dispozícii a poskytla potrebnú technickú pomoc;
Emphasises the fact that protecting biodiversity is not just a noble environmental aim, but that such a policy also has significant potential to create new skills, jobs and business opportunities;
zdôrazňuje význam vypracovania národných stratégií v politicky citlivých oblastiach; žiada príslušné orgány, aby vypracovali stratégie v týchto hlavných oblastiach riadenia, ako aj realistický harmonogram ich realizácie: územná decentralizácia a stratégia na koordináciu realizácie reformy riadenia verejných financií;
Emphasises the importance of mainstreaming biodiversity protection and conservation in the development, setting-up and financing of all other Union policies (including agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional development and cohesion, energy, industry, transport, tourism, development cooperation and aid, and research and development) so as to make Union sector-specific and budget policies more consistent and to ensure that the Union honours its binding commitments to protect biodiversity; points out, in this context, that cooperation between local, regional, national and Union authorities should be stepped up;
nalieha na Komisiu a delegáciu Únie v Srbsku, aby predchádzali problémom, ktoré sa objavili v prvej časti programového obdobia 2007 – 2013, konkrétne výberu neúplných alebo problematických projektov; podporuje spoluprácu Komisie a srbských orgánov pri riešení zistených problémov vrátane nedostatočnej podpory od vnútroštátnych orgánov, chýbajúcej medziinštitucionálnej koordinácie, slabej koncepcie projektov, nedostatočne vymedzených podmienok, neudržateľných riešení financovania a neschopnosti poučiť sa z chýb z predchádzajúcich projektov;
Notes that, despite the guidance and impetus provided by the Commission, it is for the Member States alone to set financing priorities in accordance with their own needs, and that the vast majority of Member States does not use the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) as an instrument with which to protect biodiversity;
víta skutočnosť, že v projektoch súvisiacich s riadením sa vo všeobecnosti dosiahli dobré výsledky, ale implementáciu a kontrolné systémy projektov považuje za slabé alebo neefektívne, najmä v prípadoch, v ktorých Dvor audítorov zistil závažné nedostatky v štyroch z ôsmich auditovaných projektov Nástroja predvstupovej pomoci (IPA) súvisiacich s riadením;
Takes the view, therefore, that given the low take-up rate (0,79 %) there is a need to consider making it mandatory for a proportion of ERDF funding (percentage to be confirmed) to be earmarked for the promotion of biodiversity;
upozorňuje na skutočnosť, že v reforme sektora súdnictva sa od roku 2007 nedosiahol výrazný pokrok;
Part XIX
trvá na potrebe posilniť súčasnú ochranu oznamovateľov (whistleblowers), s ktorou sa počíta v národnej stratégii boja proti korupcii na obdobie 2013 – 2018; trvá na tom, že srbské orgány by mali pokročiť vo vypracúvaní nových právnych predpisov o oznamovateľoch a takéto právne predpisy by mali vzbudzovať dôveru a povzbudzovať potenciálnych oznamovateľov k tomu, aby poskytovali informácie;
Special Report No 13/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘EU support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti’
schvaľuje odporúčania Dvora audítorov a žiada, aby Komisia venovala náležitú pozornosť vymedzeniu cieľov, posúdeniu potrieb a uplatneniu skúseností z minulých projektov, a aby sa vyhla oneskoreniam a neefektívnym a neúčinným postupom obstarávania; zdôrazňuje význam udržateľnosti, keďže výsledky priniesli množstvo otázok v dvoch tretinách projektov, najmä v projektoch súvisiacich s riadením;
Welcomes the Special Report No 13/2014 evaluating the Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti as an important contribution to the overall political debate about the Union's external humanitarian and development policies; takes note of the findings and recommendations;
Časť XXV
Welcomes and takes note of the main conclusions and recommendations of the final report on the evaluation of the Union cooperation with the Republic of Haiti carried out by the Commission's Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development — EuropeAid at the request of the Parliament and sets out its observations and recommendations below;
Osobitná správa Dvora audítorov č. 20/2014 s názvom Bola podpora v oblasti elektronického obchodu poskytnutá malým a stredným podnikom z EFRR účinná?
General comments
víta osobitnú správu Dvora audítorov č. 20/2014 a súhlasí s jej závermi a odporúčaniami;
Reiterates the overall satisfaction with the work and efforts carried out by the Commission's services in response to the earthquake in Haiti in 2010 and this, in an extremely critical situation for the Union delegation and its staff; welcomes in this respect the Commission's ability to withhold payments and disbursements as a consequence to unsatisfactory progress in the Government's financial management and deficiencies in national public procurement procedures;
víta aj konštruktívnu reakciu Komisie na odporúčania Dvora audítorov;
Regrets the weaknesses identified in the coordination between donors and within the Commission's services as also elaborated by an evaluation of the Union's cooperation with the Republic of Haiti (2008-2012) [21], which was issued on behalf of the Commission; calls, in this respect, for a better articulation of the humanitarian aid and development aid with a stronger link between relief, rehabilitation and development by means of a permanent LRRD (linking of relief, rehabilitation and development) framework; considers that integrated approaches with clearly stated coordination objectives and a coherent country strategy between the Commission's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department (ECHO) and EuropeAid, alongside the sharing of best practices, have to be set up wherever possible; welcomes, in this respect, the inclusion of the systematic integration of the LRRD approach in the funding cycle covering the period 2014-20; calls furthermore on the Commission's services to improve the transition from short-term humanitarian activities to long-term development interventions and to develop a coherent coordination, not only among different Union actors but also with national priorities through a common strategy by means of a joint humanitarian and development framework; invites the Commission to enter into a dialogue with Parliament if an effective coordination among the various financial instruments in humanitarian and development aid is hindered by the existing legal framework; believes furthermore that the involvement of local civil society non-governmental organisations can strengthen the use of the local knowledge base in order to better identify rehabilitation needs and to supervise progress achieved by national authorities;
konštatuje, že technológie elektronického obchodovania sú kľúčom k podpore rozvoja a konkurencieschopnosti malých a stredných podnikov (MSP); vyzdvihuje význam MSP pre hospodársky rozvoj a tvorbu pracovných miest v Únii;
Recalls the recommendations in the aftermath of the visit by the delegation of Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control to Haiti in February 2012 and insists, as a constant principle, on the salient issue of traceability and accountability of Union development funds, in particular by linking budget support to performance, in particular with a clear definition of obligations and duties in the national administration to ensure adequate transparency, traceability and accountability; reiterates its call for putting more emphasis on the fight against endemic corruption; points out that humanitarian aid should be based on an exit strategy and stresses that funds should be channelled through the Haitian institutions whenever possible, within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement, in order to ensure ownership and to support the strengthening of the national organs, including the Procurement Agency, which should act as a control filter; invites the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) to emphasise the conditionality matrix for sectorial budget support;
uznáva, že v osobitnej správe Dvora audítorov sa zdôrazňuje význam meraní výkonnosti a európskej pridanej hodnoty;
Recalls that ‘State building’ is at the centre of the Union development strategy and the cornerstone of any such crisis situation, in line with the principles for intervention in fragile contexts; notes that this includes supporting institutional building, the transparency and efficiency of public financial management, budgetary allocations and effectiveness of public expenditure, with reinforced political and policy dialogues;
konštatuje, že napriek skutočnosti, že dostupnosť internetového podnikania sa rozšírila, projekty vybrané na investovanie boli slabé; poznamenáva, že vzhľadom na neexistenciu porovnávacieho výberu aplikácií a komplexných podnikateľských informácií sa vo vyše tretine prípadov prejavil nízky pomer medzi nákladmi a výslednou hodnotou, prípadne sa v týchto prípadoch neprejavila žiadna výsledná hodnota;
Calls for the definition of a good policy mix in the logic of the Union intervention through a comprehensive approach to state and non-state/non-governmental stakeholders and to the sectors support to be provided through rapid sectorial needs assessment and this, to the benefit of the viability, complementarity and sustainability of projects;
poukazuje na to, že 10 z 30 spolufinancovaných projektov by sa mohlo realizovať aj bez verejného spolufinancovania, päť projektov sa začalo ešte skôr, ako bolo oznámené udelenie grantu, a realizácia troch projektov sa začala ešte predtým, ako podnik predložil žiadosť o spolufinancovanie;
Orientations for the future
zastáva názor, že by sa mala zaviesť povinnosť predložiť podnikateľský plán, v ktorom by bola uvedená európska pridaná hodnota s cieľom zabrániť zbytočným investíciám;
Considers that beyond the Haitian situation, measures need to be discussed and improved in order to strengthen the policy framework of intervention and disaster risk reduction with the ultimate purpose of limiting the risk for human lives and their human living conditions to a minimum; believes that investment in disaster risk reduction is crucial as a full component of sustainable development, as well as highly cost-effective, as it allows for a significantly more efficient and effective use of resources than paying the bill for disaster response;
zdôrazňuje, že členské štáty by mali zaviesť výberové kritériá a postupy, ktorými sa zabezpečí, aby sa vo vybraných projektoch maximalizovala pridaná hodnota v zmysle prispievania k rozvoju elektronického obchodovania v malých a stredných podnikoch a plnenia cieľov Digitálnej agendy pre Európu (DAE);
Considers that situations of crisis and fragility require the development of policies which call for new approaches, new methods and expertise, particularly concerning activities such as (i) identifying risks at different operational levels, (ii) making scenario and projections of likely consequences and (iii) designing instruments to avoid, reduce and prepare for risks and potential disaster; calls for a flexible approach in order to allow the Commission to adapt its measures and instruments for assistance adequately and rapidly to a crisis and post-crisis situation; notes in this context that in the meantime the Commission has set up a system to mobilise experts in various fields of competence in order to allow at short notice the deployment of additional staff to Union delegations or headquarter services in the case of staff shortage;
konštatuje, že vzhľadom na absenciu monitorovania Komisia sa nedalo posúdiť, do akej miery prispela podpora z Európskeho fondu regionálneho rozvoja (EFRR) k splneniu vnútroštátnych cieľov a cieľov Únie v oblasti informačných technológií, ako aj podnikateľských plánov malých a stredných podnikov;
Encourages the Commission and the EEAS to work systematically on the four phases of the disaster management cycle namely mitigation and preparedness, response and recovery towards the definition of strategic framework for disaster risk management and resilience-building; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to inform Parliament about the developments in particular with regard to risk management and the preparedness to implement and achieve programme objectives in a post-disaster context;
je presvedčený, že Komisia by mala zabezpečiť, aby dostávala od členských štátov vyčerpávajúce a spoľahlivé informácie o využívaní finančných prostriedkov z EFRR; zastáva názor, že obsahom týchto informácií by mal byť pokrok v oblasti operačných programov, a to nielen v súvislosti s financovaním, ale aj s výkonom;
Recalls that in the circumstances of any such crisis, due care has to be attributed to the soundness and operational effectiveness of the national governance framework for managing disaster risk reduction as a pre-condition for the success of the Union intervention; recalls that the assessment of any national governance framework should take into account, inter alia, the existing accountability frameworks for outcomes, the existing definition and decision of responsibilities at central and local levels, a clear chain of commands and controls, information channels among various actors/donors alongside with feedback mechanisms on projects;
zastáva rovnaký názor ako Dvor audítorov, že v dohodách o grante by sa mal vymedziť minimálny súbor ukazovateľov súvisiacich s cieľmi, ktoré sú merateľné a v ďalšom štádiu podliehajú monitorovaniu, a to keď sa projekt realizoval a uviedol do prevádzky, ako aj v neskoršom štádiu v záujme hodnotenia výkonnosti;
Supports the Court of Auditors' recommendations with regard to Union support for rehabilitation following the earthquake in Haiti and welcomes the Commission's response to also accept the recommendations;
Časť XXVI
Part XX
Osobitná správa Dvora audítorov č. 21/2014 s názvom Letiskové infraštruktúry financované z prostriedkov EÚ: nedostatočná hodnota za vynaložené peniaze
Special Report No 14/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘How do the EU institutions and bodies calculate, reduce and offset their greenhouse gas emissions?’
vyjadruje uznanie v súvislosti s tým, že Komisia už zaviedla zmeny týkajúce sa mnohých otázok uvedených v osobitnej správe, a vo všeobecnosti podporuje nový regulačný rámec, ktorý predstavila Komisia; navrhuje preto, aby Komisia predložila do roka po prijatí tohto uznesenia parlamentnému Výboru pre kontrolu rozpočtu správu o pokroku v súvislosti s týmito odporúčaniami;
Believes that all Union institutions and bodies should aim at a common approach to their greenhouse gas emissions and their possible reduction; considers that in order to achieve this they need to comprehensively calculate their greenhouse gas emissions and should not refrain from publishing their results;
podporuje odporúčanie Dvora audítorov, aby členské štáty zaviedli jednotné plány rozvoja letísk, a odporúča, aby Komisia tieto plány schvaľovala ešte pred poskytnutím finančných prostriedkov na konkrétne projekty; ďalej odporúča, aby sa v týchto regionálnych, národných alebo nadnárodných plánoch zohľadnila nielen letecká doprava, ale aj iné druhy verejnej dopravy s podobnými časmi prepravy ako v prípade letov vrátane vlakovej a autobusovej dopravy tak, aby sa predišlo presýteniu trhu a zvýšila sa realizovateľnosť poskytovania služieb;
Believes that the Commission, in order to maintain its reliability in environmental negotiations with third parties, should put more effort in collecting more data on its own greenhouse gas emissions;
odporúča, aby sa finančné prostriedky udeľovali len finančne životaschopným letiskám;
Invites those Union institutions and bodies who have no Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) certificate to consider applying it promptly; emphasises, however, that EMAS should be considered as a tool to structure, inter alia, greenhouse gas emissions and should not be considered as the sole ultimate goal of the green policy of the institutions;
odporúča Komisii, aby preskúmala všetky nové projekty z hľadiska analýzy spádovej oblasti s cieľom zaručiť realizovateľnosť a aby v každom prípade zohľadnila význam regionálnych letísk pre dostupnosť a mobilitu v Únii;
Points out that offsetting greenhouse gas emissions can be used by the Union institutions and bodies to a greater degree to reduce their carbon footprint; agrees with the Court of Auditors that using high-quality offsets in addition to emission reduction measures (and not instead of such reduction measures) would address these issues appropriately; notes however that offsetting should come second to investing these funds to further improvement of environmental policy of the Union institutions and bodies;
domnieva sa, že Komisia by sa mala prednostne sústreďovať na dôkladné monitorovanie tých členských štátov, v ktorých boli podľa správy v minulosti zistené obzvlášť problematické projekty;
Welcomes the fact that some of the Union institutions have started pilot projects of green procurement; hopes that the results prove to be promising and that green procurement will become a standard procedure of the Union institutions and bodies in the future;
poveruje svojho predsedu, aby postúpil toto uznesenie Rade, Komisii, Súdnemu dvoru Európskej únie a Dvoru audítorov, a aby zabezpečil jeho uverejnenie v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie (v sérii L).
Stresses that in the implementation of these policies, human factors remain a key aspect; urges therefore the management in the Union institutions and bodies responsible for these policies to train and improve further their skills and understanding of the importance of the greenhouse gas emissions of the institutions; hopes that the establishment of the new College of Commissioners in 2014 provides an opportunity of a new opening in implementation of higher standards in the Commission and its agencies;
Ú. v. EÚ L 66, 8.3.2013.
Part XXI
Ú. v. EÚ C 403, 13.11.2014, s. 1.
Special Report No 15/2014 of the Court of Auditors entitled ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’
Ú. v. EÚ C 398, 12.11.2014, s. 1.
Notes with concern that the strategic objectives of the External Borders Fund (EBF) have not been clear, and that, in particular, there is tension between the general nature of the EBF as solidarity mechanism and its concentration on concrete objectives for better cooperation in the field of border controls and visas;
Ú. v. EÚ C 403, 13.11.2014, s. 128.
Notes that for the Commission the successful launch of SIS II, VIS and Eurosur in all Member States indicates the contribution of the EBF; is of the opinion, however, that such a general statement can never be used as a satisfactory reply to the Court of Auditors' specific criticisms of lacking performance indicators;
Prijaté texty, P8_TA(2015) 118 (pozri stranu 25 tohto úradného vestníka).
Notes that similar problems may arise in respect of the objectives of the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund (ISF), since again this instrument serves both solidarity between Member States in respect of border controls management and the realisation of a uniform and high level of control of the external borders and the effective processing of Schengen visas, in compliance with the Union's commitment to fundamental freedoms and human rights;
Ú. v. ES L 248, 16.9.2002, s. 1.
Emphasises that Member States, whilst recognising the importance of effective border controls at the common external borders as part of the Schengen acquis, regard border controls management and, to a lesser extent, the processing of visas still as essentially national competences;
Ú. v. EÚ L 298, 26.10.2012, s. 1.
Calls on the Member States to therefore include the ISF in national strategies for border management in order to contribute to consular cooperation, to Frontex operations or to emergency actions and specific actions which are of importance to the Schengen area as a whole; urges the Commission and the Member States to improve their cooperation in this regard;
Nariadenie Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 1287/2003 z 15. júla 2003 o harmonizácii hrubého národného dôchodku v trhových cenách (nariadenie HND) (Ú. v. EÚ L 181, 19.7.2003, s. 1).
Requests that the Commission examine whether it may be useful to divide the border controls and visas part of the ISF into several earmarked segments: one for solidarity, one for the fulfilment of consular cooperation, Frontex operations and emergency and specific actions, and one for actions that are particularly relevant from a national perspective;
Nariadenie Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 1150/2000 z 22. mája 2000, ktorým sa vykonáva rozhodnutie 94/728/ES, Euratom o systéme vlastných zdrojov Európskych spoločenstiev (Ú. v. ES L 130, 31.5.2000, s. 1).