natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Likewise, the reference to recital (132) of the provisional Regulation and recital (135) of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 (the contested Regulation) refers to adjustments made to the normal value when comparing it to the export price and does not allow any conclusions as to whether export sales of the Vietnamese companies were freely determined.
Týmto sa ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo na dovoz obuvi so zvrškom z usne alebo kompozitnej usne s výnimkou športovej obuvi, obuvi, ktorej výroba si vyžaduje špeciálnu technológiu, šľapiek a ostatnej domácej obuvi a obuvi s ochrannou špičkou s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike a vo Vietname, ktorú vyrobili vyvážajúci výrobcovia vymenovaní ďalej v článku 1 ods. 3, a ktorá patrí pod číselné znaky KN: 64032000, ex64033000, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 a ex64051000, a to na dovoz, ktorý sa uskutočnil počas obdobia uplatňovania nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 1472/2006 a nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1294/2009.
Furthermore, FESI claimed that the Commission has also not explained how it arrived to the conclusion that there would be a risk of circumvention of the anti-dumping measure if the exporting producers concerned were granted an individual duty rate that would, however, be the underlying purpose of the IT criteria.
Kódy TARIC sú uvedené v prílohe k tomuto nariadeniu.
Regarding the risk of circumvention, this is only one criterion out of five listed in Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation before its amendment.
Na účely tohto nariadenia sa uplatňuje toto vymedzenie pojmov:
According to this Article all 5 criteria should be shown to be met by the exporting producer.
„športová obuv“ je obuv v zmysle poznámky k podpoložke 1 kapitoly 64 prílohy I k nariadeniu Komisie (ES) č. 1719/2005,
Therefore, failure to meet one or more criteria is sufficient to deny the IT claim without examining whether the other criteria were met.
„obuv, ktorej výroba si vyžaduje špeciálnu technológiu“, je obuv s cenou CIF najmenej 7,5 EUR za pár, ktorá je určená na použitie pri športových činnostiach, s jednoduchou alebo viacvrstvovou tvárnenou podošvou, nie vstrekovanou, vyrobenou zo syntetických materiálov osobitne určených na tlmenie nárazu zvislých alebo bočných pohybov a s technickými prvkami, ako napríklad hermetickými vložkami, ktoré sú naplnené plynom alebo kvapalinou, mechanickými komponentmi, ktoré tlmia alebo neutralizujú nárazy, alebo materiálmi, ako sú napríklad polyméry s nízkou hustotou, patriace pod číselné znaky KN ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998,
E. CONCLUSIONS
„obuv s ochrannou špičkou“ je obuv, v ktorej je zabudovaná ochranná špička s odolnosťou voči nárazu najmenej 100 joulov a je zatriedená pod číselné znaky KN: ex64033000, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 a ex64051000;
Account taken of the comments made and the analysis thereof it was concluded that in case of General Footwear Ltd the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to China, i.e. 16,5 % and in case of Diamond Vietnam Co.
„šľapky a ostatná domáca obuv“ je obuv patriaca pod číselný znak KN ex64051000.
Ltd and Ty Hung Footgearmex/Footwear Co.
Sadzba konečného antidumpingového cla uplatniteľného pred preclením na čistú frankocenu na hranici Únie v prípade výrobkov uvedených v odseku 1 a vyrobených vyvážajúcimi výrobcami uvedenými nižšie je takáto:
Ltd (‘Ty Hung Co.
Krajina
Ltd’) the residual anti-dumping duty applicable to Vietnam, i.e. 10 % should be reimposed for the period of application of the contested Regulation.
Spoločnosť
This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,
Antidumpingové clo
Article 1
ČĽR
A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of footwear with uppers of leather or composition leather, excluding sports footwear, footwear involving special technology, slippers and other indoor footwear and footwear with a protective toecap, originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by the exporting producers listed in Article 1(3) below and falling within CN codes: 64032000, ex64033000, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000 which took place during the period of application of Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009.
Článok 2
The TARIC codes are listed in the Annex to this Regulation.
Sumy zabezpečené prostredníctvom predbežného antidumpingového cla podľa nariadenia (ES) č. 553/2006 sa vyberajú s konečnou platnosťou.
For the purpose of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:
Časť zabezpečených súm, ktorá prevyšuje sadzbu konečného antidumpingového cla, sa uvoľní.
‘sports footwear’ shall mean footwear within the meaning of subheading note 1 to Chapter 64 of Annex I of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005,
Článok 3
‘footwear with a protective toecap’ shall mean footwear incorporating a protective toecap with an impact resistance of at least 100 joules and falling within CN codes: ex64033000, ex64035111, ex64035115, ex64035119, ex64035191, ex64035195, ex64035199, ex64035911, ex64035931, ex64035935, ex64035939, ex64035991, ex64035995, ex64035999, ex64039111, ex64039113, ex64039116, ex64039118, ex64039191, ex64039193, ex64039196, ex64039198, ex64039911, ex64039931, ex64039933, ex64039936, ex64039938, ex64039991, ex64039993, ex64039996, ex64039998 and ex64051000,
Toto nariadenie je záväzné v celom rozsahu a priamo uplatniteľné vo všetkých členských štátoch.
‘slippers and other indoor footwear’ shall mean such footwear falling within CN code ex64051000.
V Bruseli 28. septembra 2016
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable, before duty, to the net free-at-Union-frontier price of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the exporting producers listed below shall be as follows:
Za Komisiu
Country
predseda
Company
Ú. v. EÚ L 176, 30.6.2016, s. 21.
Anti-dumping duty
Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 553/2006 z 23. marca 2006 o uložení predbežného antidumpingového cla na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike a vo Vietname (Ú. v. EÚ L 98, 6.4.2006, s. 3).
TARIC Additional code
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1472/2006 z 5. októbra 2006, ktorým sa ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo a s konečnou platnosťou sa vyberá dočasné clo uložené na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike a vo Vietname (Ú. v. EÚ L 275, 6.10.2006, s. 1).
PRC
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 388/2008 z 29. apríla 2008, ktorým sa rozširujú konečné antidumpingové opatrenia, uložené nariadením (ES) č. 1472/2006 na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike, na dovoz rovnakého výrobku zasielaného z OAO Macao, ktorý má alebo nemá deklarovaný pôvod v OAO Macao (Ú. v. EÚ L 117, 1.5.2008, s. 1).
Vietnam
Ú. v. EÚ C 251, 3.10.2008, s. 21.
Article 2
Vykonávacie nariadenie Rady (EÚ) č. 1294/2009 z 22. decembra 2009, ktorým sa ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom vo Vietname a v Čínskej ľudovej republike, rozšírené na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne zasielanej z OAO Macao, ktorá má alebo nemá deklarovaný pôvod v OAO Macao, na základe preskúmania pred uplynutím platnosti v súlade s článkom 11 ods. 2 nariadenia Rady (ES) č. 384/96 (Ú. v. EÚ L 352, 30.12.2009, s. 1).
The amounts secured by way of the provisional anti-dumping duty pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 shall be definitively collected.
Ú. v. EÚ C 295, 11.10.2013, s. 6.
The amounts secured in excess of the definitive rate of anti-dumping duties shall be released.
Vykonávacie rozhodnutie Rady 2014/149/EÚ z 18. marca 2014, ktorým sa zamieta návrh vykonávacieho nariadenia, ktorým sa opätovne ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo a s konečnou platnosťou sa vyberá dočasné clo uložené na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike a vyrobenej spoločnosťami Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co Ltd a Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Article 3
Ltd, Ú. v. EÚ L 82, 20.3.2014, s. 27.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Nariadenie Rady (EHS) č. 2913/92 z 12. októbra 1992, ktorým sa ustanovuje Colný kódex spoločenstva (Ú. v. ES L 302, 19.10.1992, s. 1).
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 384/96 z 22. decembra 1995 o ochrane pred dumpingovými dovozmi z krajín, ktoré nie sú členmi Európskeho spoločenstva (Ú. v. ES L 56, 6.3.1996, s. 1).
Done at Brussels, 28 September 2016.
Spojené veci 97, 193, 99 a 215/86, Asteris AE a iní a Helénska republika/Komisia, Zb.
For the Commission
1988, s. 2181, body 27 a 28.
The President
Vec C-415/96, Španielsko/Komisia, Zb.
OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.
1998, s.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 553/2006 of 23 March 2006 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ L 98, 6.4.2006, p. 3).
I-6993, bod 31; vec C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques/Rada, Zb.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 of 5 October 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and Vietnam (OJ L 275, 6.10.2006, p. 1).
2000, s.
Council Regulation (EC) No 388/2008 of 29 April 2008 extending the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not (OJ L 117, 1.5.2008, p. 1).
I-8147, body 80 až 85; vec T-301/01, Alitalia/Komisia, Zb.
OJ C 251, 3.10.2008, p. 21.
2008, s.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (OJ L 352, 30.12.2009, p. 1).
II-1753, body 99 a 142; spojené veci T-267/08 a T-279/08, Région Nord-Pas de Calais/Komisia, Zb.
OJ C 295, 11.10.2013, p. 6.
2011, s.
Council Implementing Decision 2014/149/EU of 18 March 2014 rejecting the proposal for an Implementing Regulation reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Brosmann Footwear (HK) Ltd, Seasonable Footwear (Zhongshan) Ltd, Lung Pao Footwear (Guangzhou) Ltd, Risen Footwear (HK) Co.
II-1999, bod 83.
Ltd and Zhejiang Aokang Shoes Co.
Vec C-415/96 (pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 13); vec C-458/98 P (pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 13).
Ltd (OJ L 82, 20.3.2014, p. 27).
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1225/2009 o ochrane pred dumpingovými dovozmi z krajín, ktoré nie sú členmi Európskeho spoločenstva (Ú. v.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1).
EÚ L 343, 22.12.2009, s.
As from 1 May 2016, Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (‘UCC’) ( OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1) replacing the CCC, entered into force.
51).
The substantial provisions at stake here have remained the same.
Nariadenie (ES) č. 1225/2009 bolo následne zmenené nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 765/2012 z 13. júna 2012, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1225/2009 o ochrane pred dumpingovými dovozmi z krajín, ktoré nie sú členmi Európskeho spoločenstva, Ú. v.
Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1).
EÚ L 237, 3.9.2012, s.
Joined cases 97, 193, 99 and 215/86 Asteris AE and others and Hellenic Republic v Commission [1988] ECR 2181, paragraphs 27 and 28.
1 – 2.
Case C-415/96 Spain v Commission [1998] ECR I-6993, paragraph 31; Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council [2000] I-8147, paragraphs 80 to 85; Case T-301/01 Alitalia v Commission [2008] II-1753, paragraphs 99 and 142; Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08 Région Nord-Pas de Calais v Commission [2011] II-1999, paragraph 83.
Podľa článku 2 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 765/2012 sa zmeny zavedené uvedeným pozmeňujúcim nariadením uplatňujú len na prešetrovania začaté po nadobudnutí účinnosti uvedeného nariadenia.
Case C-415/96 (see footnote 13); Case C-458/98 P (see footnote 13).
Súčasné prešetrovanie sa však začalo 7. júla 2005 (Ú. v.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p.51).
EÚ C 166, 7.7.2005, s.
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 was subsequently amended by Regulation (EU) No 765/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community OJ L 237, 3.9.2012, p.
14).
1–2.
Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1395 z 18. augusta 2016, ktorým sa opätovne ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo a s konečnou platnosťou sa vyberá predbežné clo uložené na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom v Čínskej ľudovej republike, ktorú vyrábajú spoločnosti Buckinghan Shoe Mfg Co., Ltd, Buildyet Shoes Mfg., DongGuan Elegant Top Shoes Co.
According to Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 765/2012 the amendments introduced by that amending Regulation only apply to investigations initiated after the entry into force of that Regulation.
Ltd, Dongguan Stella Footwear Co Ltd, Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods Limited, Foshan City Nanhai Qun Rui Footwear Co., Jianle Footwear Industrial, Sihui Kingo Rubber Shoes Factory, Synfort Shoes Co.
The present investigation, however, was initiated on 7 July 2005 (OJ C 166, 7.7.2005, p.14)
Ltd, Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1395 of 18 August 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People's Republic of China and produced by Buckinghan Shoe Mfg Co., Ltd, Buildyet Shoes Mfg., DongGuan Elegant Top Shoes Co.
Ltd, Wei Hao Shoe Co.
Ltd, Dongguan Stella Footwear Co Ltd, Dongguan Taiway Sports Goods Limited, Foshan City Nanhai Qun Rui Footwear Co., Jianle Footwear Industrial, Sihui Kingo Rubber Shoes Factory, Synfort Shoes Co.
Ltd., Wei Hua Shoe Co.
Ltd, Taicang Kotoni Shoes Co.
Ltd a Win Profile Industries Ltd, a vykonáva sa rozsudok Súdneho dvora v spojených veciach C-659/13 a C-34/14 (Ú. v. EÚ L 225, 19.8.2016, s. 52).
Ltd, Wei Hao Shoe Co.
Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1647 z 13. septembra 2016, ktorým sa opätovne ukladá konečné antidumpingové clo a s konečnou platnosťou sa vyberá dočasné clo uložené na dovoz určitej obuvi so zvrškom z usne s pôvodom vo Vietname a vyrobenej spoločnosťami Best Royal Co.
Ltd, Wei Hua Shoe Co.
Ltd, Lac Cuong Footwear Co., Ltd, Lac Ty Co., Ltd, akciová spoločnosť Saoviet (akciová spoločnosť Megastar), VMC Royal Co Ltd, Freetrend Industrial Ltd. a jej prepojená spoločnosť Freetrend Industrial A (Vietnam) Co, Ltd, Fulgent Sun Footwear Co., Ltd, General Shoes Ltd, Golden Star Co, Ltd, Golden Top Company Co., Ltd, Kingmaker Footwear Co.
Ltd, Win Profile Industries Ltd, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 225, 19.8.2016, p. 52).
Ltd., Tripos Enterprise Inc., Vietnam Shoe Majesty Co., Ltd, a vykonáva sa rozsudok Súdneho dvora v spojených veciach C-659/13 a C-34/14, Ú. v. EÚ L 245, 14.9.2016, s. 16.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1647 of 13 September 2016 re-imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitely the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and produced by Best Royal Co.
Vec C-458/98 P, Industrie des Poudres Sphériques/Rada, Zb.
Ltd, Lac Cuong Footwear Co., Ltd, Lac Ty Co., Ltd, Saoviet Joint Stock Company (Megastar Joint Stock Company), VMC Royal Co Ltd, Freetrend Industrial Ltd and its related company Freetrend Industrial A (Vietnam) Co, Ltd, Fulgent Sun Footwear Co., Ltd, General Shoes Ltd, Golden Star Co, Ltd, Golden Top Company Co., Ltd, Kingmaker Footwear Co. Ltd, Tripos Enterprise Inc., Vietnam Shoe Majesty Co., Ltd, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 245, 14.9.2016, p. 16).
2000, s.
Case C-458/98 P Industrie des Poudres Sphériques v Council [2000] I-8147.
I-8147.
FESI's comments were filed also on behalf of Puma SE and Timberland Europe BV.
Pripomienky FESI boli podané aj v mene spoločností Puma SE a Timberland Europe BV.
Wolverine Europe BV, Wolverine Europe Limited and Damco Netherlands BV did not provide any specific comments of their own on the General Disclosure Document and simply referred to the comments made by FESI on 11 August.
Spoločnosti Wolverine Europe BV, Wolverine Europe Limited a Damco Netherlands BV neposkytli žiadne vlastné konkrétne pripomienky ku všeobecnému informačnému dokumentu, iba sa odvolali na pripomienky predložené federáciou FESI 11. augusta.
Case 270/84 Licata v ESC [1986] ECR 2305, paragraph 31 Case C-60/98 Butterfly Music v CEDEM [1999] ECR 1-3939, paragraph 24; Case 68/69 Bundesknappschaft v Brock [1970] ECR 171, paragraph 6; Case 1/73 Westzucker GmbH v Einfuhr und Vorratsstelle für Zucker [1973] 723, paragraph 5; Case 143/73 SOPAD v FORMA a.o.
Vec 270/84, Licata/ESS, Zb.
ECR 1433, paragraph 8; Case 96/77 Bauche [1978] ECR 383, paragraph 48; Case 125/77 KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV v Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten [1978] ECR 1991, paragraph 37; Case 40/79 Ρ v Commission [1981] ECR 361, paragraph 12; Case T-404/05 Greece v Commission [2008] ECR II-272, paragraph 77; C-334/07 Ρ Commission v Freistaat Sachsen [2008] ECR 1-9465, paragraph 53.
1986, s. 2305, odsek 31, vec C-60/98, Butterfly Music/CEDEM, Zb.
Case T-176/01 Ferrière Nord ν Commission [2004] ECR II-3931, paragraph 139; C-334/07 Ρ (see footnote 22).
1999, s. 1-3939, bod 24; vec 68/69, Bundesknappschaft/Brock, Zb.
OJ C 166, 7.7.2005, p. 14.
1970, s. 171, bod 6; vec 1/73, Westzucker GmbH/Einfuhr und Einfuhr und Vorratsstelle für Zucker, Zb.
Case C-169/95 Spain v Commission [1997] ECR I-135, paragraph 51 to 54; Joined Cases T-116/01 and T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA v Commission [2003] ECR II-2957, paragraph 205.
1973, s. 723, bod 5; vec 143/73, SOPAD/FORMA a.o., Zb.
Case C-34/92 GruSa Fleisch v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas [1993] ECR I-4147, paragraph 22.
1973, s. 1433, bod 8; vec 96/77, Bauche, Zb.
The same or similar wording can be found for example in Joined cases 212 to 217/80 Meridionale Industria Salumi α.δ.
1978, s. 383, bod 48; vec 125/77, KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV/Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten, Zb.
ECR 2735, paragraph 9 and 10; Case 21/81 Bout [1982] ECR 381, paragraph 13; Case T-42/96 Eyckeler & Malt v Commission [1998] ECR II-401, paragraphs 53 and 55 to 56; Case T-180/01 Euroagri v Commission [2004] ECR II-369, paragraphs 36 to 37.
1978, s. 1991, bod 37; vec 40/79, P/Komisia, Zb.
Case C-337/88 Società agricola fattoria alimentare (SAFA) [1990] ECR I-1, paragraph 13.
1981, s. 361, bod 12; vec T-404/05, Grécko/Komisia, Zb.
Case 245/81 Edeka v Germany [1982] ECR 2746, paragraph 27.
2008, s.
Case T-299/05 Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise and Shanghai Adeptech Precision v Council [2009] ECR II- 565, paragraph 116 to 146.
II-272, bod 77; vec C-334/07 P, Komisia/Freistaat Sachsen, Zb.
Case C-141/08 P, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.
2008, s. 1-9465, bod 53.
Ltd v. Council [2009] I-9147, paragraph 94 and following.
vec T-176/01, Ferrière Nord/Komisia, Zb.
OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.
Ú. v. EÚ C 166, 7.7.2005, s. 14.
Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 December 2012 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 344, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
Vec C-169/95, Španielsko/Komisia, Zb.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 of 23 July 2001 on the measures that may be taken by the Community following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10), recital 6.
1997, s.
See for example Case T-221/05 Huvis v Council [2008] ECR II-124 and Case T-249/06 Interpipe Nikopolsky v Council [2009] ECR II-303.
2003, s.
For the sake of completeness, the following explanations appear useful: In case T-107/08 ENRC v Council, the General Court found that there was no dumping, or, at the very least, that the dumping margin established would have been lower than that calculated in the contested regulation, and therefore annulled the contested Council Regulation in its entirety (Case T-107/08 ENRC v Council [2011] ECR II-8051, paragraphs 67 to 70).
II–2957, bod 205.
Pursuant to the general principle of Union law of res judicata, the Commission and the Council are bound by the findings of the Union Courts, where those can, on the basis of the facts in front of them, come to a definitive conclusion on dumping, injury, causal link and Union interest.
II–369, body 36 až 37.
The impact resistance shall be measured according to European Norms EN345 or EN346.
2009, s.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1732
Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1732
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1733
Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1733
fixing the representative prices and additional import duties applicable to molasses in the sugar sector from 1 October 2016
ktorým sa stanovujú reprezentatívne ceny a výška dodatočných dovozných ciel na melasu v sektore cukru uplatniteľné od 1. októbra 2016
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 of the Council [1], and in particular Article 183 thereof,
so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1308/2013 zo 17. decembra 2013, ktorým sa vytvára spoločná organizácia trhov s poľnohospodárskymi výrobkami a ktorým sa zrušujú nariadenia Rady (EHS) č. 922/72, (EHS) č. 234/79, (ES) č. 1037/2001 a (ES) č. 1234/2007 [1], a najmä na jeho článok 183,