natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Case C-337/88 Società agricola fattoria alimentare (SAFA) [1990] ECR I-1, paragraph 13.
1986, s. 2305, bod 31; vec C-60/98, Butterfly Music/CEDEM, Zb.
Case 245/81 Edeka v Germany [1982] ECR 2746, paragraph 27.
1999, s. 1-3939, bod 24; vec 68/69, Bundesknappschaft/Brock, Zb.
OJ C 166, 7.7.2005, p. 14.
1970, s. 171, bod 6; vec 1/73, Westzucker GmbH/Einfuhr und Einfuhr-und Vorratsstelle für Zucker, Zb.
Case T-299/05 Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise and Shanghai Adeptech Precision v Council [2009] ECR II- 565, paragraph 116 to 146.
1973, s. 723, bod 5; vec 143/73 SOPAD/FORMA a.o., Zb.
Case C-141/08 P, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.
1973, s. 1433, bod 8; vec 96/77, Bauche, Zb.
Ltd v. Council [2009] I-9147, paragraph 94 and following.
1978, s. 383, bod 48; vec 125/77, KoninklijkeScholten-Honig NV/Floofdproduktschaap voor Akkerbouwprodukten, Zb.
Case T-320/13 Delsolar v Commission [2014] II-0000, paragraphs 40 to 67.
1978, s. 1991, bod 37; vec 40/79, P/Komisia, Zb.
OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.
1981, s. 361, bod 12; vec T-404/05, Grécko/Komisia, Zb.
OJ L 343 22.12.2009, p. 51,.
2008, s.
Regulation (EU) No 1168/2012 of 12 December 2012 of the European Parliament and the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ L 344, 14.12.2012, p. 1).
II-272, bod 77; vec C-334/07 P, Komisia/Freistaat Sachsen, Zb.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1515/2001 of 23 July 2001 on the measures that may be taken by the Community following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters (OJ L 201, 26.7.2001, p. 10), recital 6 of the preamble.
2008, s. 1-9465, bod 53.
OJ L 82, 20.3.2014, p. 27.
Vec T-176/01, Ferrière Nord/Komisia, Zb.
Regulation (EU) No 37/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2014 amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures (OJ L 18, 21.1.2014, p.
2004, s. 11-3931, bod 139; vec C-334/07 P, Komisia/Freistaat Sachsen, Zb.
1).
2008, s. 1-9465, bod 53.
Case C-138/09 Todaro [2010] ECR I-4561.
Vec C-169/95, Španielsko/Komisia, Zb.
Case T-167/94 Nölle v Council and Commission [1995] II-2589, paragraph 62 and 63.
1997, s.
See for example Case T-221/05 Huvis v Council [2008] ECR II-124 and Case T-249/06 Interpipe Nikopolsky v Council [2009] ECR II-303.
I-135, body 51 až 54; spojené veci T-116/01 a T-118/01, P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA/Komisia, Zb.
For the sake of completeness, the following explanations appear useful: In case T-107/08 ENRC v Council, the General Court found that there was no dumping, or, at the very least, that the dumping margin established would have been lower than that calculated in the contested regulation, and therefore annulled the contested Council Regulation in its entirety (Case T-107/08 ENRC v Council [2011] ECR II-8051, paragraphs 67 to 70).
2003, s.
When the Commission applied the method prescribed by the General Court, it turned out that there was neither dumping nor injury.
II-2957, bod 205.
The Commission therefore refrained from formally resuming the investigation.
Vec C-34/92, GruSa Fleisch/Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas, Zb.
In the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-351/04 Ikea (Case C-351/04 Ikea [2007] ECR I-7723), the Court of Justice had partially declared invalid the Council Regulation, namely to the extent that the duty had been calculated by relying on the technique of so-called ‘zeroing’.
1993, s. 1-4147, bod 22.
The institutions had re-calculated the duty without using zeroing already at an earlier stage, following a ruling of the WTO appellate body, and found that no dumping had occurred, and therefore terminated the investigation without imposing measures (i.e. effectively setting the new duty at zero) (Council Regulation (EC) No 160/2002 of 28 January 2002 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2398/97 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Egypt, India and Pakistan, and terminating the proceeding with regard to imports originating in Pakistan, OJ L 26, 30.1.2002, p. 2.).
Podmienky rovnakého alebo podobného znenia možno nájsť napríklad v spojených veciach 212 až 217/80, Meridionale Industria Salumi α.δ., Zb.
In case T-498/04 Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group v Council (Case T-498/04 Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group v Council [2009] ECR I-1969), the Council filed an appeal.
1981, s. 2735, body 9 a 10; vo veci 21/81, Bout, Zb.
Therefore, the annulment only took effect on the date at which the Court of Justice handed down its judgment on appeal (Case C-337/09 P Council v Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group [2012] ECR I-0000), which was on 19 July 2012.
1982, s. 381, bod 13; veci T-42/96, Eyckeler & Malt/Komisia, Zb.
In that judgment, the General Court, confirmed by the Court of Justice, found that the Commission and the Council were obliged to grant market-economy treatment to the applicant, which was the only Chinese company that had exported the product concerned during the investigation period.
1998, s. 11-401, bod 53 a body 55 až 56; veci T-180/01, Euroagri/Komisia, Zb.
In that case, contrary to the present case, the Commission and the Council had actually carried out the analysis of the market economy treatment claim and had rejected that request as unfounded.
2004, s.
The Union Courts held that — contrary to the view expressed by the Commission and the Council — the claim actually was founded, and therefore normal value had to be calculated on the basis of the data provided by Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group.
II-369, bod 36.
The Commission would normally have resumed the procedure, in order to propose to the Council to impose a duty for the future.
Pozri aj vec C-337/88, Società agricola fattoria alimentare (SAFA), Zb.
However, in the case at hand, the Commission (Commission Decision 2009/383/EC of 14 May 2009 suspending the definitive anti-dumping duties imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China, OJ L 120, 15.5.2009, p. 20) and the Council (Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 126/2010 of 11 February 2010 extending the suspension of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1683/2004 on imports of glyphosate originating in the People's Republic of China, OJ L 40, 13.2.2010, p. 1) had decided in 2009 and 2010 to suspend the anti-dumping duty for the period until the end of its applicability on 30 September 2010, considering that injury was unlikely to resume due to the high profit levels of the Union industry.
1990, s.
Hence, there was no need to resume the procedure in view of the imposition of a duty for the future.
I-1, bod 13.
There was also no scope to resume the procedure in view of a re-imposition for the past: Contrary to the present case, there was no sampling.
Vec 245/81, Edeka/Nemecko, Zb.
Indeed, Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group was the only exporting producer that had sales to the Union market in the investigation period.
1982, s. 2746, bod 27.
As the Commission and the Council would have been obliged to grant Zheijiang Xinan Chemical Group market economy treatment, the Union Courts had annulled the finding of dumping.
Ú. v.
Case T-348/05 JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky v Council (Case T-348/05 JSC Kirovo-Chepetsky v Council [2008] ECR II-159) is a very peculiar case.
EÚ C 166/14, 7.7.2005, s. 14.
The Commission had initiated a partial interim review at the request of the Union industry, and had at that occasion broadened the scope of the products concerned, by including a different product.
Vec T-299/05, Shanghai Excell M&E Enterprise a Shanghai Adeptech Precision/Rada, Zb.
The General Court held that it was not possible to proceed in that manner, but that it was necessary to launch a separate investigation into the product that had been added.
2009, s.
On the basis of the general principle of Union law of res iudicata, there was no scope for the institutions to resume the partial interim review following the annulment.
II-565, body 116 až 146.
See for example Council Regulation (EC) No 412/2009 of 18 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People's Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan, OJ L 125, 25.1.2009, p. 1 (compliance with Huvis); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2012 of 21 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 954/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes, of iron or steel originating in Croatia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine, OJ L 165, 26.6.2012, p. 1 (compliance with Interpipe Nikopolsky).
Vec C-141/08 P, Foshan Shunde Yongjian Housewares & Hardware Co.
See for example Case C-338/10 Gruenwald Logistik Services [2012] ECR I-0000 and the re-imposition of duties by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 158/2013 of 18 February 2013 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved citrus fruits (namely mandarins, etc.) originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ L 49, 22.2.2013, p. 29).
Ltd./Rada, Zb.
See also the following examples: In case T-158/10 Dow v Council, the General Court found that there was no likelihood of continuation of dumping (Case T-158/10 Dow v Council [2012] ECR II-0000, paragraphs 47 and 59).
2009, s.
In case T-107/04 Aluminium Silicon Mill Products v Council, the General Court found that there was no causal link between dumping and injury (Case T-107/04 Aluminium Silicon Mill Products v Council [2007] ECR II-672, paragraph 116).
I-9147, bod 94 a nasl.
Pursuant to the general principle of Union law of res judicata, the Commission and the Council are bound by the findings of the Union Courts, where those can, on the basis of the facts in front of them, come to a definitive conclusion on dumping, injury, causal link and Union interest.
Vec T-320/13, Delsolar/Komisia, Zb.
The Commission and the Council can therefore not deviate from the Union Court's findings.
2014, s.
In such a situation, the investigation is closed by virtue of the judgment of the Union Courts, which come to the definitive conclusion that the complaint of the Union industry is unfounded in law.
II-0000, body 40 až 67.
Following those two judgments, there was therefore no scope for the Commission and the Council to resume an investigation, which is why no further steps were taken following those judgments.
Ú. v. ES L 56, 6.3.1996, s. 1.
Case 199/82 San Giorgio [1983] ECR 3595, paragraph 13.
Ú. v. EÚ L 343, 22.12.2009, s. 51.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 of 17 February 2016 establishing a procedure for assessing certain market economy treatment and individual treatment claims made by exporting producers from China and Vietnam, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in joined cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ L 41, 18.2.2016, p. 3).
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1168/2012 z 12. decembra 2012, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1225/2009 o ochrane pred dumpingovými dovozmi z krajín, ktoré nie sú členmi Európskeho spoločenstva (Ú. v. EÚ L 344, 14.12.2012, s. 1).
By virtue of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 301, 31.10.2006, p. 1) this CN code is replaced on 1 January 2007 by CN codes ex64035105, ex64035905, ex64039105 and ex64039905.
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 1515/2001 z 23. júla 2001 o opatreniach, ktoré môže prijať Spoločenstvo na základe správy prijatej orgánom na urovnávanie sporov WTO, ktorá sa týka antidumpingových a antidotačných opatrení (Ú. v. ES L 201, 26.7.2001, s. 10), odôvodnenie 6.
As defined in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 286, 28.10.2005, p. 1).
Ú. v. EÚ L 82, 20.3.2014, s. 27.
The product coverage is determined in combining the product description in Article 1(1) and the product description of the corresponding CN codes taken together.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 37/2014 z 15. januára 2014, ktorým sa menia určité nariadenia, ktoré sa vzťahujú na spoločnú obchodnú politiku, pokiaľ ide o postupy prijímania určitých opatrení (Ú. v. EÚ L 18, 21.1.2014, s. 1).
The impact resistance shall be measured according to European Norms EN345 or EN346.
Vec C-138/09, Todaro, Zb.
See footnote 43.
2010, s.
Retroactivity in the sense of Article 10(1) of the basic Regulation, however, refers only to a situation where the goods were introduced into free circulation before measures were introduced, as can be seen from the very text of that provision as well as from the exception for which Article 10(4) of the basic Regulation provides.
2012, s.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1649
Delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) 2016/1649
supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility
ktorým sa dopĺňa nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 o zriadení Nástroja na prepájanie Európy
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010 [1], and in particular Article 21 thereof,
so zreteľom na nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 z 11. decembra 2013 o zriadení Nástroja na prepájanie Európy, ktorým sa mení nariadenie (EÚ) č. 913/2010 a zrušujú sa nariadenia (ES) č. 680/2007 a (ES) č. 67/2010 [1], a najmä na jeho článok 21,
On 7 January 2014 the Commission adopted Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 [2] establishing transport funding priorities for the purpose of the multiannual and annual work programmes.
Komisia prijala 7. januára 2014 delegované nariadenie (EÚ) č. 275/2014 [2], ktorým sa stanovujú priority financovania dopravy na účely viacročných a ročných pracovných programov.
By its judgement of 17 March 2016 in Case C-286/14 European Parliament v Commission the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 and ordered that the effects of that Regulation be maintained until the entry into force, within a reasonable period, which may not exceed six months from the date of delivery of the judgment, of a new act intended to replace it.
Vo svojom rozsudku zo 17. marca 2016 vo veci C-286/14, Európsky parlament/Komisia zrušil Súdny dvor Európskej únie delegované nariadenie (EÚ) č. 275/2014 a nariadil, aby sa účinky uvedeného nariadenia zachovali až do nadobudnutia účinnosti nového aktu, ktorý ho má nahradiť, a to v primeranej lehote, ktorá nesmie byť dlhšia ako šesť mesiacov odo dňa vyhlásenia uvedeného rozsudku.
According to Article 21(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, the transport funding priorities should take into account the eligible actions contributing to projects of common interest in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council [3] listed under Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013.
Podľa článku 21 ods. 3 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 by sa v prioritách financovania dopravy mali zohľadniť oprávnené opatrenia, ktorými sa prispieva k projektom spoločného záujmu v súlade s nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1315/2013 [3] a ktoré sa uvádzajú v článku 7 ods. 2 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013.
The eligible actions listed in Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 are further detailed in Articles 10 and 11 of that Regulation providing the maximum applicable funding rates for those actions.
Oprávnené opatrenia uvedené v článku 7 ods. 2 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 sú podrobnejšie rozpísané v článkoch 10 a 11 uvedeného nariadenia, pričom sa stanovujú maximálne uplatniteľné miery financovania uvedených opatrení.
It is therefore appropriate to refer to the actions as listed in those Articles in order to detail the transport funding priorities.
Pri podrobnom stanovovaní priorít financovania dopravy je preto vhodné sa odvolávať na opatrenia v uvedených článkoch.
Projects of common interest as listed in Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 are eligible to the multiannual work programmes referred to in Article 17(3) of that Regulation.
Projekty spoločného záujmu uvedené v časti I prílohy I k nariadeniu (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 sú oprávnené na podporu v rámci viacročných pracovných programov podľa článku 17 ods. 3 uvedeného nariadenia.
Projects not listed in Part I of Annex I but eligible as per Article 7(2) of that Regulation are eligible to the annual work programmes.
Projekty, ktoré nie sú uvedené v časti I prílohy I, ale sú oprávnené v zmysle článku 7 ods. 2 uvedeného nariadenia, sú oprávnené na podporu v rámci ročných pracovných programov.
Pursuant to Article 4(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 laying down the specific transport sectoral objectives, and considering that Article 21(3) of that Regulation empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with its Article 26 detailing, for the transport sector, the funding priorities to be reflected in the work programmes, this Delegated Regulation sets out such priorities to be reflected in multi-annual or annual work programmes in accordance with Article 17(3) of the said Regulation.
Podľa článku 4 ods. 2 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013, ktorým sa stanovujú špecifické ciele v sektore dopravy, a vzhľadom na to, že článkom 21 ods. 3 uvedeného nariadenia je Komisia splnomocnená prijímať delegované akty v súlade s jeho článkom 26, sa týmto delegovaným nariadením podrobne stanovujú pre sektor dopravy priority financovania, ktoré sa majú premietnuť do viacročných alebo ročných pracovných programov v súlade s článkom 17 ods. 3 uvedeného nariadenia.
Considering that financial instruments are to receive Union contribution under the annual work programmes, it is appropriate to include hereby a corresponding priority.
Keďže na finančné nástroje sa má poskytnúť príspevok Únie v rámci ročných pracovných programov, je vhodné zahrnúť do tohto nariadenia príslušnú prioritu.
Programmes support actions listed in Article 5(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, consisting of technical and administrative assistance expenses incurred by the Commission for the management of the Connecting Europe Facility and capped at 1 % of the financial envelope, will not be covered by the work programmes.
Opatrenia na podporu programu podľa článku 5 ods. 2 písm. b) nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013, ktoré zahŕňajú výdavky Komisie na technickú a administratívnu pomoc pri riadení Nástroja na prepájanie Európy do výšky 1 % finančného krytia, nespadajú pod pracovné programy.
However the programme support actions contributing to projects of common interest as provided for in Article 7(2) and referred to in Article 5(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 will be covered by the work programmes and are included hereby with a corresponding priority.
Tie opatrenia na podporu programov, ktoré prispievajú k projektom spoločného záujmu, ako sa stanovuje v článku 7 ods. 2, a ktoré sa uvádzajú v článku 5 ods. 2 písm. a) nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013, však spadajú pod pracovné programy a týmto sa im priraďuje príslušná priorita.
All resources referred in Article 5(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, including the resources transferred from the Cohesion Fund will be covered under the same work programmes.
Všetky prostriedky uvedené v článku 5 ods. 1 písm. a) nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 vrátane prostriedkov prevedených z Kohézneho fondu spadajú pod tie isté pracovné programy.
According to Article 11 of that Regulation, the resources transferred from the Cohesion Fund will be subject to specific calls for proposals.
Podľa článku 11 uvedeného nariadenia podliehajú prostriedky prevedené z Kohézneho fondu špecifickým výzvam na predkladanie návrhov.
In order to allow for the timely adoption of the implementing acts provided for in Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 to ensure legal continuity of the Connecting Europe Facility — Transport sector — programme, this Regulation should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
S cieľom umožniť včasné prijatie vykonávacích aktov stanovených v článku 17 ods. 3 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 na účely zabezpečenia právnej kontinuity programu Nástroj na prepájanie Európy pre odvetvie dopravy by toto nariadenie malo nadobudnúť účinnosť dňom nasledujúcim po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie,
This Regulation establishes the funding priorities to be reflected in the multiannual and annual work programmes referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 for the duration of the Connecting Europe Facility for eligible actions under Article 7(2) of that Regulation, as set out in the Annex.
Týmto nariadením sa stanovujú priority financovania, ktoré sa majú premietnuť do viacročných a ročných pracovných programov uvedených v článku 17 nariadenia (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 počas trvania Nástroja na prepájanie Európy, pokiaľ ide o oprávnené opatrenia podľa článku 7 ods. 2 uvedeného nariadenia, ako sa uvádza v prílohe.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the first day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Toto nariadenie nadobúda účinnosť prvým dňom po jeho uverejnení v Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie.
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 275/2014 of 7 January 2014 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (OJ L 80, 19.3.2014, p. 1).
Delegované nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 275/2014 zo 7. januára 2014, ktorým sa mení príloha I k nariadeniu Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1316/2013 o zriadení nástroja na prepájanie Európy (Ú. v. EÚ L 80, 19.3.2014, s. 1).
Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU (OJ L 348, 20.12.2013, p. 1).
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1315/2013 z 11. decembra 2013 o usmerneniach Únie pre rozvoj transeurópskej dopravnej siete a o zrušení rozhodnutia č. 661/2010/EÚ (Ú. v. EÚ L 348, 20.12.2013, s. 1).
TRANSPORT FUNDING PRIORITIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE MULTIANNUAL AND ANNUAL WORK PROGRAMMES
PRIORITY FINANCOVANIA DOPRAVY NA ÚČELY VIACROČNÝCH A ROČNÝCH PRACOVNÝCH PROGRAMOV
Funding priorities for the objective of bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks, enhancing rail interoperability, and, in particular, improving cross-border sections:
Priority financovania cieľa premostenia chýbajúcich prepojení, odstránenia úzkych miest, zlepšenia interoperability železníc, a najmä skvalitnenia cezhraničných úsekov:
pre-identified projects on the Corridors of the Core Network (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports).
predbežne identifikované projekty na koridoroch základnej siete (železnice, vnútrozemské vodné cesty, cesty, námorné a vnútrozemské prístavy);
pre-identified projects on the other sections of the Core Network (railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and inland ports).
predbežne identifikované projekty na ostatných úsekoch základnej siete (železnice, vnútrozemské vodné cesty, cesty, námorné a vnútrozemské prístavy);
rail interoperability.
interoperabilita železníc;
deployment of ERTMS.
zavádzanie ERTMS.