natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 provides that aid to SMEs for participation in fairs is compatible with the common market if the aid intensity does not exceed 50 % of eligible costs and if the eligible costs are limited to those incurred for renting, setting up and running the stand for the first participation of an undertaking in any particular fair or exhibition.
celkovú sumu (istina a úroky z vymáhania), ktoré sa majú od každého príjemcu vymôcť;
According to paragraph 106 of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, no State aid was approved for large enterprises under technical assistance.
podrobný opis opatrení, ktoré už boli prijaté alebo ktoré sú plánované na vykonanie tohto rozhodnutia;
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts regarding the compatibility of a measure (RP 2) with the internal market in the relevant period [76].
podklady, z ktorých vyplýva, že príjemcom bolo nariadené pomoc vrátiť.
Measure RP 2
Nemecko bude informovať Komisiu o pokroku dosiahnutom v súvislosti s vnútroštátnymi opatreniami, ktoré sa prijali na vykonanie tohto rozhodnutia, až do úplného vrátenia pomoci poskytnutej na základe schém uvedených v článku 2.
Under measure RP 2, Rhineland-Palatinate granted financial support to processing and marketing companies for participation in forums to share knowledge between businesses, competitions, exhibitions and fairs.
Na požiadanie Komisie Nemecko bezodkladne predloží všetky informácie o opatreniach, ktoré už boli prijaté a ktoré sú plánované na vykonanie tohto rozhodnutia.
Eligible costs were those incurred in setting up an exhibition stand (see paragraph 125).
Takisto poskytne podrobné informácie o sumách pomoci a úrokoch, ktoré už príjemcovia vrátili.
Aid intensity was limited to 10 % of proven costs, but not more than EUR 5200 per business and event (see paragraph 119).
Článok 8
The aid intensity of 10 % under measure RP 2 does not exceed the maximum aid intensity value of 50 % laid down in Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008.
Toto rozhodnutie je určené Spolkovej republike Nemecko.
The subsidised costs (costs related to setting up an exhibition stand) correspond to the eligible costs in accordance with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008, which state that renting, setting up and running a stand are eligible for aid (see paragraphs 294 and 295).
Nemecku sa adresuje výzva bezodkladne doručiť príjemcom kópiu tohto rozhodnutia.
However, these rules state that only the first participation of an undertaking in any particular fair or exhibition is eligible.
V Bruseli 29. mája 2017
In their comments of 20 September 2013, Germany provided a table containing the number of businesses which were granted subsidies in the period 2003 – 2012 for repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition, together with the respective aid amounts (see paragraph 123).
Za Komisiu
This table shows that the average funding amounts for repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition per subsidised company and year was between EUR 294 and EUR 5113 in the period 2007-2012.
člen Komisie
In its comments dated 13 January 2017, Germany also stated that the two undertakings Hochwald Foods GmbH and MUH Arla eG had received aid under this sub-measure (see paragraph 124).
S účinnosťou od 1. decembra 2009 sa články 87 a 88 Zmluvy o ES stali článkami 107 a 108 ZFEÚ.
MUH Arla came into existence in 2012 as a result of the merger of Milch-Union Hocheifel (MUH) and the Scandinavian dairy conglomerate Arla Foods.
Tieto dva články sú v podstate totožné.
In 2011, MUH employed around 800 staff and had a turnover of around EUR 693 million [77].
Na účely tohto rozhodnutia by sa odkazy na článok 107 ZFEÚ mali v relevantnom prípade chápať ako odkazy na článok 87 Zmluvy o ES a odkazy na článok 108 ako odkazy na článok 88 Zmluvy o ES.
The Hochwald group employs more than 1900 staff and achieved a turnover of around EUR 1,44 billion in 2015 [78].
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 659/1999 z 22. marca 1999 ustanovujúce podrobné pravidlá na uplatňovanie článku 108 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v.
Given these figures, neither MUH Arla eG nor Hochwald Foods GmbH fell within the definition of a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) set out in point 9 of Chapter II of the 2007-2013 Guidelines [79].
ES L 83, 27.3.1999, s.
In accordance with point 106 of the 2007-2013 guidelines, they should not, therefore, have received any aid (see paragraph 296).
1).
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are thus fulfilled only for cases in which processing and marketing businesses falling under the definition of SMEs received under measure RP 2 aid for the first participation in a particular fair or exhibition.
Nariadenie Rady (EÚ) 2015/1589 z 13. júla 2015 stanovujúce podrobné pravidlá na uplatňovanie článku 108 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v. EÚ L 248, 24.9.2015, s. 9).
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH (see paragraph 305).
S účinnosťou od 14. novembra 2015 sa týmto nariadením Rady zrušuje nariadenie (ES) č. 659/1999 a nahrádzajú tieto pravidlá.
The requirements of Chapter IV.K. of the 2007-2013 Guidelines, in conjunction with Article 5(b) of Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 and Article 27 of Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 respectively, are also not fulfilled for aid granted under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraph 301).
V súlade s článkom 35 nariadenia (EÚ) 2015/1589 sa odkazy na zrušené nariadenie považujú za odkazy na nariadenie (EÚ) 2015/1589 a musia sa chápať v súlade s korelačnou tabuľkou v prílohe II k uvedenému nariadeniu.
The Commission concludes that aid under measure RP 2 met the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007 only in the cases referred to in paragraph 306.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 3.
In the cases referred to in paragraphs 307 and 308, aid measure RP 2 did not meet the relevant conditions of the 2007-2013 Guidelines and was therefore not compatible with the internal market in the period from 2007.
Naposledy článkom 397 nariadenia z 31. augusta 2015 (BGBl.
State aid for quality products in the period 2001-2006
I, s. 1474).
Measures to encourage the production and marketing of quality agricultural products implemented between 2001 and 2006 must meet the conditions specified under point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Strany 34 – 36.
Point 13.2 contains a non-exhaustive list of eligible activities in this area.
Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 1857/2006 z 15. decembra 2006 o uplatňovaní článkov 87 a 88 zmluvy o štátnej pomoci pre malé a stredné podniky (MSP) pôsobiace v poľnohospodárskej výrobe, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa nariadenie (ES) č. 70/2001 (Ú. v. EÚ L 358, 16.12.2006, s. 3).
Aid may be granted for consultancy and similar support, including technical studies, feasibility and design studies and market research, to be given for activities related to the development of quality agricultural products, including:
Usmernenia Spoločenstva o štátnej pomoci v sektore poľnohospodárstva a lesného hospodárstva na roky 2007 – 2013 (Ú. v. EÚ C 319, 27.12.2006, s. 1).
the introduction of quality assurance schemes such as the ISO 9000 or 14000 series, systems based on hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) or environmental audit systems,
Strany 37 – 39.
the costs of training personnel to apply quality assurance and HACCP systems.
Strana 38.
Aid may also be granted to cover the cost of the charges levied by recognised certifying bodies for the initial certification of quality assurance and similar systems.
Strana 43.
Points 3, 4 and 5 of point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines provide for special conditions and limitations.
Strana 47.
The Commission takes the view that no aid should be granted in respect of routine in-process quality controls and routine product controls undertaken by the manufacturer, irrespective of whether they are undertaken on a voluntary basis or on a compulsory basis as a part of HACCP or similar systems.
Ú. v. ES C 28, 1.2.2000, s. 2.
Aid should only be granted in respect of controls undertaken by or on behalf of third parties, such as the competent regulatory authorities, or bodies acting on their behalf, or independent organisms responsible for the control and supervision of the use of denominations of origin, organic labels, or quality labels.
Strany 39 – 40.
The total amount of aid that can be granted for SMEs under this section must not exceed 50 % of eligible costs or EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years, depending on which amount is higher (see point 13.2).
Strany 40 – 41.
Baden-Württemberg, Lower Saxony and Thuringia (sub-measures BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) granted financial support for improving the quality of the delivered milk through advice and training of dairy producers, the compilation and updating of databases and checks of dairy producers, parallel with the introduction of the ‘Quality Management QM Milk’ quality assurance systems (see paragraph 126).
Oznámenie z 27. februára 2015, s. 47.
According to the German authorities, aid intensity amounted to a maximum of 100 % of eligible costs (see paragraph 129).
Oznámenie zo septembra 2013, s. 41 – 42.
In the Opening Decision, the Commission expressed doubts regarding the compatibility of the abovementioned sub-measures with the internal market in the relevant period [80].
Strany 43 – 47.
The two sub-measures were carried out by the Milchprüfring Baden-Württemberg (BW 10) and the Milchwirtschaftlicher Verein Baden-Württemberg (BW 11) in favour of milk-producing agricultural enterprises which took part in the ‘QM-Milch’ quality assurance system (see paragraphs 131 and 132).
Strana 55.
The execution of audits at dairy farms and the cost of initial certification by a recognised certification body (BW 10) as well as the costs of consultancy tasks in connection with the introduction of the quality assurance system (BW 11) were subsidised (see paragraphs 133 and 134).
Strana 56.
The subsidised costs thus correspond to the eligible costs laid down in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
V tejto súvislosti nemecké orgány ubezpečili, že v roku 2001 (v období relevantnom pre preskúmanie) sa vo vzťahu k príjemcom neprijali žiadne právne záväzky.
Support was not provided for quality and product checks carried out routinely by the manufacturers during the production process, which are excluded in accordance with point 13.3.
Strany 58 – 59.
According to the German authorities, the average expenditure was EUR 106 per beneficiary (see paragraph 135), well below the maximum allowable amount under point 13.2 of EUR 100000 per beneficiary over a period of three years.
Strany 70 – 74.
The conditions set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines are thus fulfilled in the case of sub-measures BW 10 and BW 11.
Strana 76.
Lower Saxony granted the LVMN financial support for the implementation of a quality assurance system for milk producers (‘QM-Milch’).
Oznámenie z februára 2013.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
Právny základ propagačných činností v Porýní-Falcku je stanovený v rozhodnutí č. 381/2009 o štátnej pomoci s názvom „Agrarmarketingmaßnahmen in Rheinland-Pfalz“.
The costs of preparatory measures for the implementation of the QM-Milch system (consulting services) as well as the costs for the coordination of the QM-Milch system and the creation of a database were subsidised (see paragraph 137).
Oznámenie z 27. februára 2015, s. 48.
Funding amounted to EUR 12,78 per case for consulting services and EUR 35 per farmer within 3 years for farm audits (see paragraph 138), which is well below the upper threshold specified in point 13.2 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Strana 80.
Germany has confirmed that the checks in the farm audits were carried out by or on behalf of third parties where the Landeskontrollverband Niedersachsen acts as an independent supervisory institution (see paragraph 139).
Strana 82.
This meets the requirements laid down in point 13.3.
Strana 83.
The measure in question thus fulfils the requirements set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
Strana 84.
Thuringia granted the Thüringer Verband für Leistungs- und Qualitätsprüfungen in der Tierzucht (TVLEV) financial support for the introduction of a quality assurance system for milk producers (see paragraph 140).
Strana 85.
Point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines therefore applies.
Ú. v. EÚ C 319, 27.12.2006, s. 1.
According to the German authorities, the measure was introduced in 2004 (see paragraph 140).
Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 70/2001 z 12. januára 2001 o uplatňovaní článkov 87 a 88 Zmluvy ES na štátnu pomoc malým a stredným podnikom (Ú. v.
According to Germany, in the period 2004-2006, producers were only subsidised with respect to initial certification.
EÚ L 10, 13.1.2001, s.
The average aid granted to individual producers amounted to approximately EUR 83 (see paragraph 141).
33).
The subsidised costs correspond to the costs eligible under point 13.2 and the amount of aid is far below the ceiling set in the same point.
Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 800/2008 zo 6. augusta 2008 o vyhlásení určitých kategórií pomoci za zlučiteľné so spoločným trhom podľa článkov 87 a 88 zmluvy (Všeobecné nariadenie o skupinových výnimkách) (Ú. v.
Measure TH 5 thus fulfils the requirements set out in point 13 of the 2000-2006 Guidelines.
EÚ L 214, 9.8.2008, s.
The Commission concludes that the aid assessed above (BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) did meet the relevant conditions of the 2000-2006 Guidelines and was therefore compatible with the internal market in the period 2001-2006.
3) bolo 1. júla 2014 zrušené nariadením Komisie (EÚ) č. 651/2014 zo 17. júna 2014 o vyhlásení určitých kategórií pomoci za zlučiteľné s vnútorným trhom podľa článkov 107 a 108 zmluvy (Ú. v. EÚ L 187, 26.6.2014, s. 1).
Recovery
Bod 244 rozhodnutia o začatí konania.
Article 17(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 states that the powers of the Commission to recover aid are subject to a limitation period of 10 years.
Strana 77.
According to Article 17(2) of that same Regulation, any action taken by the Commission with regard to unlawful aid interrupts this limitation period.
Toto nariadenie bolo zrušené 1. júla 2014 nariadením Komisie (EÚ) č. 702/2014 z 25. júna 2014, ktorým sa určité kategórie pomoci v odvetví poľnohospodárstva a lesného hospodárstva a vo vidieckych oblastiach vyhlasujú za zlučiteľné s vnútorným trhom pri uplatňovaní článkov 107 a 108 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v. EÚ L 193, 1.7.2014, s. 1).
Further to Germany's submission of the 2010 annual report on State aid in the agricultural sector, the Commission asked Germany by letter of 28 November 2011 to provide additional information on the scheme.
Systém riadenia kvality mlieka QM-Milch je celoštátna medzipodniková norma platná medzi výrobcami mlieka a mliekarňami, ktorá bola uznaná ako základ na certifikáciu pre kontrolné orgány.
This action by the Commission interrupted the limitation period.
Bod 66 rozhodnutia o začatí konania.
In line with the ten-year limitation period referred to in paragraph 334, this Decision therefore relates to the period from 28 November 2001.
Bod 253 rozhodnutia o začatí konania.
The Commission finds that the aid granted to Nordmilch eG in the period 2002-2003 under measure NI 6 (see paragraph 289) is not compatible with the internal market.
Strana 11.
This aid must be recovered.
Pripomienky z 20. septembra 2013, s. 12.
The Commission also finds that the aid granted under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH (see paragraph 307) and the aid granted in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraph 308) are not compatible with the internal market.
Pripomienky zo septembra 2013, s. 50.
Based on the suspensive effect of the formal procedure under Article 108(3) TFEU, the Commission is examining measure RP 2 from 1 January 2007 up to 17 July 2013, the date on which the Commission notified Germany of its decision to initiate proceedings under Article 108(2) TFEU.
Strana 50.
CONCLUSION
Pripomienky z 20. septembra 2013, s. 83 – 84.
The Commission finds that Germany has unlawfully implemented the aid schemes in question in question in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Oddiel 3.3.
This aid is, with the exception of the aid cases mentioned in the following recital, compatible with the internal market (see paragraphs 289, 309 and 333).
Komisia dostala od združenia Landesvereinigung der Milchwirtschaft Niedersachsen e.V. pripomienky ku všetkým opatreniam financovaným z poplatku za mlieko vo všeobecnosti, nielen k príslušným čiastkovým opatreniam, ktoré sú predmetom tohto konania.
The Commission finds that the aid granted under measure NI 6 to Nordmilch eG and the aid granted under measure RP 2 to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH, and the aid granted under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition (see paragraphs 290 and 310) are not compatible with the internal market.
Združenie tvrdilo, že nebola poskytnutá žiadna pomoc.
This aid must be recovered,
Úplný opis týchto pripomienok sa uvádza v rozhodnutí Komisie (EÚ) 2015/2432 z 18. septembra 2015 o štátnej pomoci SA.35484 (2013/C) [ex SA.35484 (2012/NN)], ktorú schválilo Nemecko na účely kontrol akosti mlieka v rámci zákona o mlieku a tukoch (Ú. v. EÚ L 334, 22.12.2015, s. 23).
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora z 20. novembra 2003, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie/GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, bod 23.
Article 1
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora z 20. novembra 2003 vo veci C-126/01, Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie/GEMO, C-126/01, EU:C:2003:622, s.
State aid granted unlawfully by Germany between 28 November 2001 and 31 December 2006 (measures BY 3, BY 10, BW 4, BB 1, BB 3, HE 2, HE 3, HE 9, NI 5, NI 6, NI 7, NW 4, NW 5, NW 6, RP 1, RP 5, SL 2, SL 5, TH 3, TH 4, TH 9, TH 10, BW 10, BW 11, NI 1 and TH 5) or between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013 (measure RP 2) in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU is compatible with the internal market, with the exception of that referred to in Article 2.
I-13769, bod 24.
Article 2
Napríklad v Dolnom Sasku: nariadenie o vyberaní poplatku v mliekarenskom priemysle z 26. novembra 2004 (Úradný vestník Dolného Saska č. 36/2004, s. 519) zmenené článkom 6 nariadenia z 22. decembra 2005 (Úradný vestník Dolného Saska č. 31/2005, s. 475).
State aid granted by Germany in 2002 and 2003 to Nordmilch eG as part of measure NI 6, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, is incompatible with the internal market.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora z 30. mája 2013 vo veci C-677/11, Doux Élevage SNC a Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE/Ministère de l'Agriculture, C677/11, EU:C:2013:348, body 32, 35 a 38.
The aid granted by Germany between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, under measure RP 2 to undertakings not falling under the definition of SMEs, in particular to MUH Arla eG and Hochwald Foods GmbH, is incompatible with the internal market.
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora zo 17. septembra 1980, Philip Morris Holland BV/Komisia, C-730/79, EU:C:1980:209, body 11 a 12.
State aid granted by Germany between 1 January 2007 and 17 July 2013, in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU, under measure RP 2 in respect of repeated participation in a particular fair or exhibition, is incompatible with the internal market.
Pozri najmä rozsudok z 13. júla 1988, Francúzska republika/Komisia, ECLI:EU:C:1988:391, bod 19.
Article 3
Vykonávacie nariadenie Komisie (EÚ) č. 927/2012 z 9. októbra 2012, ktorým sa mení a dopĺňa príloha I k nariadeniu Rady (EHS) č. 2658/87 o colnej a štatistickej nomenklatúre a o Spoločnom colnom sadzobníku (Ú. v. EÚ L 304, 31.10.2012, s. 1).
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 2 does not constitute aid if, at the time it was granted, it met the conditions laid down in a regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 [81] and that regulation was applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 4
Zdroj: Eurostat.
Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 2 which, at the time the aid is granted, fulfils the conditions laid down in a regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 or by any other approved aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market, up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to this type of aid.
Nariadenie Komisie (ES) č. 794/2004 z 21. apríla 2004, ktorým sa vykonáva nariadenie Rady (EÚ) 2015/1589, stanovujúce podrobné pravidlá na uplatňovanie článku 108 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v. EÚ L 140, 30.4.2004, s. 1).
Article 5
Rozsudok Súdneho dvora z 30. apríla 2002, Gibraltár/Komisia, T-195/01 a T-207/01, ECLI: EU:T:2002:111, bod 111.
The Federal Republic of Germany shall recover from the beneficiaries the aid that was granted in relation to the aid schemes referred to in Article 2 and that is incompatible with the internal market.
Pozri odôvodnenie 17.
The amount to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which it was put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until its actual recovery.
Bavorsko: Verordnung über eine Umlage für Milch (nariadenie o poplatku za mlieko) z 30. júna 1983 (GVBL, s. 547); Bádensko-Württembersko: Verordnung über die Erhebung von milchwirtschaftlichen Umlagen (nariadenie o vyberaní poplatkov v mliekarenskom priemysle) z 18. mája 2004 (GBl. s. 350, 355); Severné Porýnie-Vestfálsko: Verordnung über Umlagen zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (nariadenie o poplatkoch na podporu mliekarenského priemyslu) z 30. novembra 1965 (GV.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 [82] amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004.
NW.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the schemes referred to in Article 2 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
1965, s. 349); napr. Porýnie-Falcko: Landesverordnung zur Durchführung des Milch- und Fettgesetzes (krajinské nariadenie, ktorým sa vykonáva zákon o mlieku a tukoch) zo 16. augusta 1960 (GVBl. s. 218, BS 7842-2); Brandenbursko: Verordnung zur Übertragung der Ermächtigungen zum Erlass von Rechtsverordnungen nach dem Milch- und Fettgesetz (nariadenie, ktorým sa vykonávajú delegované právomoci podľa zákona o mlieku a tukoch — ÜErmVO) z 5. decembra 1992 [GVBl.II/92, (č. 72), s. 764]; Hesensko: Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (nariadenie o vyberaní poplatkov na podporu mliekarenského priemyslu) z 1. decembra 1981 (GVBl.
Article 6
I 1981 s 427); Sársko: Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage auf dem Gebiet der Milchwirtschaft (nariadenie o vyberaní poplatkov v mliekarenskom priemysle) z 9. decembra 1982 (Úradný vestník 1982, s. 1007); Durínsko:Thüringer Verordnung über die Erhebung einer Umlage zur Förderung der Milchwirtschaft (nariadenie Durínska o vyberaní poplatkov na podporu mliekarenského priemyslu) z 27. novembra 2001 (GVBl.
Recovery of the aid granted under the schemes referred to in Article 2 shall be immediate and effective.
2000, 20).
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months of the date of notification of the Decision.
V Dolnom Sasku bol poplatok za mlieko zavedený nariadením o vyberaní poplatku v mliekarenskom priemysle zo 6. júla 1951 v znení nariadenia z 25. marca 1952 (Úradný vestník Dolného Saska, Sb.
Article 7
I, s. 689).