natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The State aid, unlawfully put into effect by Germany in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty in favour of Germanwings, TUIFly and Ryanair/AMS by means of the airport services agreements and marketing services agreements concluded on 15 September 2006 (Germanwings), 1 April 2008 (TUIFly), and 22 September 2008/6 October 2008 (Ryanair/Airport Marketing Services (‘AMS’)) is incompatible with the internal market.
Vec C-35/96, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
Article 2
1998, s.
The loan granted to FZG by Sparkasse Südwestpfalz does not constitute State aid.
I-3851;
Article 3
1991, s.
Germany shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiaries.
I-1979;
FGAZ and FZG shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by either of them.
vec C-244/94, Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances/Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, Zb.
Ryanair and AMS shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by either of them.
1995, s.
The sums to be recovered are as follows:
I-4013;
in respect of the direct investment grants granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate and the ZEF in favour of FZG:
vec C-55/96, Job Centre, Zb.
EUR 20564170 granted between 12 December 2000 and 31 December 2009, minus the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz to the extent that they were covered by the direct investment grants;
1997, s. I-7119.
in respect of the annual capital injections granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate and the ZEF in favour of FGAZ:
Vec 118/85, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
EUR 26629000 granted between 2000 and 2009, minus the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz to the extent that they were covered by the annual capital injections, and minus those sums granted before 12 December 2000;
1987, s. 2599;
in respect of the 100 % guarantee on the loan granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate in favour of FZG:
vec 35/96, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
in respect of the participation of FGAZ in the cash-pool of Land Rhineland-Palatinate:
I-3851.
the cash-equivalent of the advantageous loan conditions, to be determined pursuant to the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007, minus any advantage received on loans that were used to cover the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz;
Rozsudok vo veci Lipsko/Halle, zvlášť body 93 – 94;
in respect of the airport services agreement concluded between Germanwings and FZG on 15 September 2006:
potvrdené rozsudkom vo veci C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen a Flughafen Leipzig-Halle/Komisia, Zb.
the amount of incompatible aid;
2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821;
in respect of the airport services agreement concluded between TUIFly and FZG on 1 April 2008:
pozri tiež vec T-128/89 Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
in respect of the airport services agreement and marketing services agreements concluded between Ryanair and FZG on 22 September 2008 and between AMS and the Land Rhineland-Palatinate on 6 October 2008:
2000, s II-3929, potvrdené rozsudkom vo veci C-82/01P Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
the amount of incompatible aid.
2002, s I-9297 a vo veci T-196/04 Ryanair/Komisia („rozsudok vo veci Charleroi“) Zb.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
2008, s II-3643.
Germany shall provide the exact dates on which the aid provided by the State was put at the disposal of the respective beneficiaries.
Veci C-159/91 a C-160/91, Poucet/AGV a Pistre/Cancave, Zb.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [119].
1993, s.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
I- 637.
Article 4
Rozsudok vo veci Lipsko – Halle, body 42 – 43.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Vec C-170/83, Hydrotherm, Zb.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
1984, s I- 2999, bod 11.
Article 5
Pozri aj vec T-137/02, Pollmeier Malchow/Komisia, Zb.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information:
2004, s.
the total amount of aid received by the beneficiaries, and in particular:
II- 3541, bod 50.
the amount of direct investment grants, capital injections, and the cash-equivalent of advantageous loans that covered the costs of fire brigade services and costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) LuftSiG;
Spoločné vykonávanie hospodárskej činnosti sa zvyčajne posudzuje analyzovaním existencie funkčných, hospodárskych a organických prepojení medzi subjektmi.
information on the creditworthiness of FGAZ/FZG when the 100 % guarantee was issued and when each loan from the cash-pool was provided, with a view to enabling the Commission to determine the cash-equivalent of the guarantee and the advantageous conditions of the cash-pool loans in line with the Commission Notice on the application of Article 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees and Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007, respectively;
Pozri napríklad vec C-480/09 P, AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA/Komisia, Zb.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
2010, s I-13355, body 47 – 55;
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
vec C-222/04 Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze/Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a iní, Zb.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
2006, s I-289, bod 112.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Vec C-480/09 P, Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA/Komisia, Zb.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
2010, s I-13355, body 47 – 55;
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
vec C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a iní, Zb.
Article 6
2006, s I-289, bod 112.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Rozsudok vo veci Lipsko/Halle, bod 95.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Pozri tiež, analogicky, vec C-205/03, FENIN/Komisia, Zb.
For the Commission
2006, s.
Vice-President
I-6295, bod 26.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: ‘TFEU’).
Pozri zápisnicu z dozornej rady spoločnosti FGAZ z 2. októbra 2006, z ktorej vyplýva, že letisko prijíma odplatu za poskytovanie služieb vojenským používateľom.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
1994, s.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
I- 43.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Decision.
Vec C-118/85 Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
OJ C 216, 21.7.2012, p. 56.
1987, s. 2599, body 7 a 8 a vec C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, Zb.
Written question E-6470/08 of 2 December 2008 by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission regarding subsidisation of Zweibrücken airport by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate.
1988, s 2479, bod 18.
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
Rozhodnutie Komisie N 309/02 z 19. marca 2003.
Application of Article 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement to State aids in the Aviation Sector (OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p. 5).
Pozri najmä vec C-364/92, SAT Fluggesellschaft/Eurocontrol, Zb.
Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p. 1).
1994, s.
OJ C 113, 15.4.2014, p. 30.
I- 43, bod 30 a vec C-113/07 P, Selex Sistemi Integrati/Komisia, Zb.
Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385/58).
2009, s.
Commission Decision of 22 December 1993 — K (93) 3964/6 — KONVER I — and Commission Decision of 21 December 1995 — K (95) 3208 — KONVER II.
I- 2207, bod 71.
For Rhineland-Palatine the conversion projects included the project ‘military airfield Zweibrücken’.
Pozri okrem iného vec C-172/03 Wolfgang Heiser/Finanzamt Innsbruck, Zb.
Union financing reached EUR 9 million.
2005, s.
http://www.flughafen-zweibruecken.de/de/wir-ueber-uns-de/daten-und-fakten-de.
I- 1627, bod 36 a citovanú judikatúru.
All distances in road kilometres, based on the fastest route.
Rozhodnutie Komisie z 20. februára 2014 vo veci štátnej pomoci SA.
Source:
35847 (2012/N) – Česká republika – Ostravské letisko, zatiaľ neuverejnené v úradnom vestníku, odôvodnenie 16.
maps.google.com, accessed 25 June 2014.
Zweibrücken nie je uvedený v zozname vojenskej leteckej informačnej príručky Nemecka (MIL AIP Nemecko), ktorá obsahuje zoznam všetkých vojenských letísk v Nemecku.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009, p. 56.
Vec C-482/99 Francúzsko/Komisia („Stardust Marine“), Zb.
covered by the obligation of professional secrecy
2002, s.
Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission (hereinafter: ‘Leipzig/Halle judgment’) [2011] ECR II-1311, in particular paragraphs 93-94;
I-4397.
confirmed by case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v Commission [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:821.
Spojené veci T-267/08 a T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, 2011, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, bod 108.
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67).
Vec C-39/94, Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) a iní/La Poste a iní, Zb.
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3).
1996, s.
Commission Communication on a European Union framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (2011) (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 15).
I- 3547, bod 60 a vec C-342/96, Španielske kráľovstvo/Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev, Zb.
Communication from the Commission: Community Guidelines on State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty (2004) (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
1999, s.
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007 (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6).
I- 2459, bod 41.
Commission Notice on the application of Article 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10).
Vec 173/73, Talianska republika/Komisia Európskych spoločenstiev, Zb.
Submitted as Annex 8 to Germany's submission of 27 January 2011.
1974, s. 709, bod 13.
Prof. Dr Heuer und Prof. Dr Klophaus, unter Mitarbeit von Dr Berster and Wilken, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft — und Raumfahrt, Januar 2006, ‘Regionalökonomische Bedeutung und Perspektiven des Flugplatzes Zweibrücken’, S. 146;
Vec C-482/99, Francúzsko/Komisia („Stardust Marine“), Zb.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009, p. 85.
2002, s.
Airport Services Agreement between Ryanair and FZG of 22 September 2008, Section 3.
I-4397, bod 69.
Oxera, ‘How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test?’ prepared for Ryanair, on 17 January 2014.
Vec C-305/89, Taliansko/Komisia („ALFA Romeo“) Zb.
Oxera, ‘How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test? — Practical application’ prepared for Ryanair, on 31 January 2014.
1991, s.
Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851;
I–1603, bod 23;
Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser [1991] ECR I-1979;
Vec T-296/97, Alitalia/Komisia, Zb.
Case C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances v Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche [1995] ECR I-4013;
2000, s.
Case C-55/96 Job Centre [1997] ECR I-7119.
II-03871, bod 84.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599;
Vec C-0/85, Belgicko/Komisia, Zb.
Case 35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851.
1986, s.
Leipzig/Halle judgment, in particular paragraphs 93-94;
I-2321.
confirmed by case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v Commission [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:821;
Stardust Marine, bod 71.
Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet v AGV and Pistre v Cancave [1993] ECR I-637.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 22.
Leipzig-Halle judgment, paragraphs 42-43.
Vec T-214/95, Het Vlaamse Gewest/Komisia, Zb.
Case C-170/83 Hydrotherm [1984] ECR I-2999, paragraph 11.
1998, s.
See also case T-137/02 Pollmeier Malchow v Commission [2004] ECR II-3541, paragraph 50.
II-717.
The joint exercise of an economic activity is normally assessed by analysing the existence of functional, economic and organic links between the entities.
Mai 2003, Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau, 15. mája 2003.
See for instance, case C-480/09 P AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA v Commission, [2010] ECR I-13355, paragraphs 47-55;
Einschätzung der rheinland-pfälzischen Innenministeriums, 15. mája 2003.
Case C-222/04 Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 112.
Vec T-109/01, Fleuren Compost/Komisia, Zb.
Case C-480/09 P Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA v Commission [2010] ECR I-13355, paragraphs 47-55;
2004, s.
Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 112.
II-127.
Leipzig/Halle judgment, paragraph 95.
Ú. v.
See also, by analogy, Case C-205/03 P FENIN v Commission [2006] ECR I-6295, paragraph 26.
EÚ C 119, 22.5.2002, s. 22.
See minutes of FGAZ's supervisory board of 2 October 2006, indicating that the airport is remunerated for offering services to military users.
Bod 173 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol [1994] ECR I-43.
Bod 172 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8, and Case C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées [1988] ECR 2479, paragraph 18.
Bod 25 písm v) usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Case C-343/95 Cali & Figli v Servizi ecologici porto di Genova [1997] ECR I-1547; Commission Decision N309/02 of 19 March 2003; Commission Decision N438/02 of 16 October 2002, Aid in support of the public authority functions in the Belgian port sector (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002).
Vyjadrené v zisku pred odpočítaním úrokov, daní, odpisov a amortizácie (ďalej len „EBITDA“).
Commission Decision N309/02 of 19 March 2003.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, „Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025“, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, september 2009;
See, in particular, Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol [1994] ECR I-43, paragraph 30 and Case C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati v Commission [2009] ECR I-2207, paragraph 71.
Intraplan Consult GmbH, „Luftverkehrsprognose Flughafen Saarbrücken – Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse“, október 2010.
See, amongst others, Case C-172/03 Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck [2005] ECR I-1627, paragraph 36, and case-law cited.
Rozhodnutie Komisie z 1. októbra 2014 vo veci štátnej pomoci SA.
Commission decision of 20 February 2014 in State aid case SA.35847 (2012/N) — Czech Republic — Ostrava Airport, not yet published in the Official Journal, recital 16.
26190 – Nemecko – Letisko Saarbrücken, zatiaľ neuverejnené v úradnom vestníku.
Zweibrücken is not listed in the Military Aeronautical Information Publication Germany (MIL AIP Germany), containing a list of all military airports in Germany.
Komisia poznamenáva, že spoločnosť TUIFly uviedla, že jej rozhodnutie odísť zo Saarbrückenu a prejsť do Zweibrückenu bolo motivované bezpečnostnými obavami súvisiacimi so vzletovou a pristávacou dráhou v Saarbrückene.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission (‘Stardust Marine’) [2002] ECR I-4397.
Na druhej strane Nemecko v rámci formálneho vyšetrovacieho konania vo veci SA.
Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais [2011], ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, paragraph 108.
26190 tvrdilo, že rozhodnutia leteckých spoločností odísť zo Saarbrückenu sa nikdy neodôvodňovali odkazom na infraštruktúru v Saarbrückene.
Case C-39/94 Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraph 60 and case C-342/96 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraph 41.
Komisia nemôže špekulovať o skutočných motívoch prechodu spoločnosti TUIFly zo Saarbrückenu do Zweibrückenu.
Case 173/73 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 13.
Napríklad letisko Lipsko/Halle súperilo s letiskom Vatry (Francúzsko) o zriadenie európskeho strediska spoločnosti DHL.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission (‘Stardust Marine’) [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 69.
Pozri Rozsudok vo veci Lipsko/Halle, bod 93.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission (‘ALFA Romeo’) [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 23;
Reakcia letiska Liege na verejnú konzultáciu o usmerneniach v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-03871, paragraph 84.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, „Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025“, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, september 2009.
Case 40/85 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR I-2321.
Rozhodnutie Komisie z 1. októbra 2014 vo veci štátnej pomoci SA.
Stardust Marine, paragraph 71.
26190 – Nemecko – Letisko Saarbrücken, zatiaľ neuverejnené v úradnom vestníku.
Case C-124/10P European Commission v Électricité de France (‘EDF’) [2012], ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, paragraph 85.
Ú. v. EÚ C 297, 29.11.2005.
See footnote 22.
Usmernenia v oblasti letectva z roku 2005, bod 66.
Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717.
Pozri tiež článok 4 rozhodnutia o SVHZ z roku 2005.
Mai 2003, Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau, 15 May 2003.
Pozri rozhodnutie N 381/04 – Francúzsko – projekt vysokokapacitnej telekomunikačnej siete v departmente Pyrénées-Atlantiques (DORSAL), Ú. v. EÚ C 162, 2.7.2005, s. 5.
Einschätzung der rheinland-pfälzischen Innenministeriums, 15 May 2003.
Pozri usmernenia v oblasti letectva z roku 2014, bod 72.
Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission [2004] ECR II-127.
Pozri tiež vec T-79/10 Colt Télécommunications France/Komisia, 2013, ECLI:EU:T:2013:463, body 150 – 151, 154, 158 a 166.
OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22.
Tamtiež, body 92, 119.
Point 173 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Vyjadrenie Nemecka z 27. januára 2011, s. 17:
Point 172 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
„Aus der Aufstufung des Flughafens [vom Verkehrslandeplatz zum Verkehrsflughafen] folgt des Weiteren eine Betriebspflicht des Flughafens“.
Point 25(v) of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Podľa bodu 137 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014 sa nie všetky podmienky stanovené v oddiele 5.1 usmernení vzťahujú na prevádzkovú pomoc poskytnutú v minulosti.
Expressed in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation (‘EBITDA’).
Bod 137, 113 a 114 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009;
Body 137 a 116 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Intraplan Consult GmbH, ‘Luftverkehrsprognose Flughafen Saarbrücken — Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse’, October 2010.
Body 137 a 124 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
Commission decision of 1 October 2014 in State aid case SA.26190 — Germany — Saarbrücken Airport, not yet published in Official Journal.
Body 137 a 125 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
The Commission notes that TUIFly submitted that its decision to leave Saarbrücken and move to Zweibrücken was motivated by security concerns related to Saarbrücken's runway.
Body 137 a 131 usmernení v oblasti letectva z roku 2014.
On the other hand, Germany has asserted in the context of the formal investigation procedure in case SA.26190 that decisions of airlines to leave Saarbrücken were never justified with reference to Saarbrücken's infrastructure.
Spojené veci T-267/08 a T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, 2011, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, bod 108.
The Commission is not in a position to speculate as to the precise motives of TUIFly in moving from Saarbrücken to Zweibrücken.
Smernica Komisie 2006/111/ES zo 16. novembra 2006 o transparentnosti finančných vzťahov členských štátov a verejných podnikov a o finančnej transparentnosti v niektorých podnikoch (Ú. v. EÚ L 318, 17.11.2006, s.
For example Leipzig/Halle airport was in competition with Vatry airport (France) for the establishment of the DHL European hub.
17).
See Leipzig/Halle judgment, paragraph 93.
Účinok cash-poolu je dosť podobný 100 % záruke poskytnutej spoločnostiam FGAZ/FZG bez účtovania poplatku alebo požadovania zábezpeky.
Response of Liege airport to the public consultation on the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Spolková krajina nesie riziko neuhradenia záväzku spoločností FGAZ/FZG bez toho, aby za to získala kompenzačnú platbu.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009.
Stardust Marine, body 51 a nasl.
Commission decision of 1 October 2014 in State aid case SA.26190 — Germany — Saarbrücken airport, not yet published in Official Journal.
Pozri napríklad rozhodnutie Komisie vo veci C 41/2005, Maďarské uviaznuté náklady (Ú. v. EÚ C 324, 21.12.2005, s. 12), s ďalšími odkazmi.
OJ C 297, 29.11.2005.
Tamtiež.
2005 Aviation Guidelines, paragraph 66.
V priebehu tohto stretnutia spoločnosť Ryanair navrhla zachovať trať medzi Londýnom a Zweibrückenom otvorenú počas zimy „za […] EUR“ a bola ochotná začať prevádzkovať dve nové trate (Barcelona a Alicante) z Zweibrückenu „za […] EUR“.
See also Article 4 of the 2005 SGEI Decision.
Vec T-196/04, Ryanair/Komisia, Zb.
See Decision N 381/04 — France — Project for a high capacity telecommunications network in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques (DORSAL) (OJ C 162, 2.7.2005, p. 5).
2008, s.
See 2014 Aviation Guidelines, point 72.
II-3643, bod 59.
Point 72 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Pozri rozhodnutie Komisie 2011/60/EÚ z 27. januára 2010 o štátnej pomoci C12/08 (ex NN 74/07) – Slovensko – Zmluva medzi Letiskom Bratislava a spoločnosťou Ryanair (Ú. v. EÚ L 27, 1.2.2011, s. 24).
See also point 34 of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines.
Pozri http://corporate.ryanair.com/investors/biographies/, navštívené 23. júna 2014.