natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, the Commission notes that, even if the change in wording of the services for which BSCA receives compensation is ignored, the details of the costs covered under Article 25 of the schedule of conditions, as amended by Amendment No 5, differ in that they include certain costs that were not previously mentioned, namely ‘the ground traffic and airport site safety services include routine maintenance of the airport site, … minor surfacing work, routine maintenance and repair of the runway and accesses, operational maintenance and servicing of the general lighting and runway lighting, mowing services, rubber removal from the runway and its markings, snow clearance and any other services ensuring the safety of ground traffic, airport site and infrastructures, except for commercial areas of the airport zone’.
V predpokladoch regiónu sa nezohľadňuje ročná indexácia pristávacích poplatkov ani vyšší počet cestujúcich spoločnosti Ryanair nad 1,75 milióna; tieto dve úpravy majú protichodný vplyv na skutočnú výšku poplatkov za cestujúceho, ktoré platí spoločnosť Ryanair.
The subsidy was capped, whereas it had not been previously.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1107/2006 z 5. júla 2006 o právach zdravotne postihnutých osôb a osôb so zníženou pohyblivosťou v leteckej doprave, Ú. v.
This cap applied from the initial entry into force of Amendment No 5 and therefore had an impact on the amount of the subsidy paid by the Region to BSCA from the first year.
EÚ L 204, 26.7.2006, s. 1.
The amount of the subsidy had to be revised before July 2009 [234].
Táto suma podlieha každoročnej indexácii.
Based on these points, the Commission takes the view that the measure was substantially affected by the adoption of Amendment No 5 of 10 March 2006 to the Region/BSCA agreement.
Pozri: http://www.charleroi-airport.com/b2b/redevances-aeroportuaires/vols-regulierscharters/index.html.
Amendment No 6 of 15 January 2008 to the Region/BSCA agreement substantially amended Amendment No 5 by significantly extending the scope of the services for which the Region paid a subsidy to BSCA, as those services subsequently included flight tracking and recording, provisional flight planning, marshalling and security.
Poplatok PMR za rok N + 1 = [0,10 – 0,30] EUR × cestujúci spoločnosti Ryanair 2009/cestujúci spoločnosti Ryanair za rok N. Počet cestujúcich spoločnosti Ryanair za rok 2009 je 3289725.
As set out in Section 6.1.1, the Commission takes the view that these services, except for the security services, constitute economic services.
Promocy bola spoločným podnikom spoločností BSCA a Ryanair, ktorú založili na základe dohôd z roku 2001.
The Commission therefore concludes that the subsidy paid by the Region to BSCA for certain services associated with the airport activities cannot be regarded as a measure having been continuously in force and not having been substantially amended since 1991.
Odpoveď Belgicka doručená Komisii 18. marca 2014 s názvom „odpoveď na žiadosť Komisie o informácie zo 7. februára 2014“ (odpoveď na otázku 18).
The payment of this subsidy is based on several new measures applicable in succession.
BAC zdôrazňuje, že súkromný investor by na základe investícií vo výške 281 miliónov EUR, ktoré spoločnosť SOWAER vynaložila na infraštruktúry BSCA, počítal s návratnosťou investícií najmenej 14 miliónov EUR (5 %).
Those examined in this decision are: (a) Amendment No 3 of 29 March 2002 to the Region/BSCA agreement; (b) Amendment No 5 of 10 March 2006 to the Region/BSCA agreement; and (c) Amendment No 6 of 15 January 2008 to the Region/BSCA agreement.
Spoločnosť SOWAER však v roku 2009 získala výnos vo výške len 0,66 % po zdanení príjmov právnických osôb a regiónu Valónsko ani spoločnosti SOWAER neplynuli v rokoch 2002 – 2007 iné príjmy, napríklad dividendy.
Measures (a) to (c) cannot benefit from the 10-year limitation period as there were less than 10 years between the date when they were granted and 20 April 2011, which was the date when the Commission sent its first request for information to Belgium on the subject of the aid granted to BSCA.
Ročné amortizačné náklady BAC teda dosahujú 30 % ročných príjmov.
As stipulated by Article 15 of the Procedural Regulation, any action taken by the Commission or by a Member State, acting at the request of the Commission, with regard to the unlawful aid shall interrupt the limitation period.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 8.
The Commission therefore concludes that the limitation period laid down by Article 15 of the Procedural Regulation does not apply to the aid granted to BSCA and examined in this decision.
Rozhodnutie 2004/393/ES, odôvodnenie 300.
Applicability of the principle of legitimate expectations to the subsidy paid by the Region for certain services associated with the airport activities
Priame náklady na lietadlo a na rotáciu pri odlete z letiska Brusel-National vrátane poplatkov za pristátie, poplatkov za cestujúcich, iných poplatkov a nákladov na pozemnú obsluhu.
Article 14(1) of the Procedural Regulation stipulates that ‘The Commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of Community law’.
Na základe predpokladaného objemu dopravy 1700000 cestujúcich v roku 2003 predstavuje rozdiel v nákladoch 23 miliónov EUR.
In particular, the Commission cannot require recovery of aid that, although granted within the 10-year period defined in Article 15(1) of the Procedural Regulation, may be covered by the existence of a legitimate expectation — in the mind of the beneficiary of the aid — resulting from acts or positions taken by the Commission in the past.
Smernica Rady 96/67/ES z 15. októbra 1996 o prístupe k trhu služieb pozemnej obsluhy na letiskách Spoločenstva (Ú. v.
As indicated in Section 5.4 of this decision, Belgium maintains that recovery of the subsidy paid by the Region for certain services associated with the airport activities would be contrary to the principle of legitimate expectations.
ES L 272, 25.10.1996, s.
However, the Court of Justice has ruled that the beneficiary of unlawful aid may not in principle invoke a legitimate expectation [235].
36).
The beneficiary should in fact have checked that the aid granted had been notified to and approved by the Commission.
Smernica naposledy zmenená nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1882/2003 z 29. septembra 2003, ktorým sa podľa rozhodnutia Rady 1999/468/ES upravujú ustanovenia týkajúce sa výborov, ktoré pomáhajú Komisii pri výkone jej vykonávacích právomocí ustanovených v nástrojoch, ktoré podliehajú postupu uvedenému v článku 251 Zmluvy o založení ES (Ú. v.
In this respect, the Commission notes that the aid granted to BSCA was not notified to the Commission.
EÚ L 284, 31.10.2003, s.
Absence of precise assurances
1).
Moreover, as clarified by the Court of Justice [236], a person may not plead infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations ‘unless he has been given precise assurances by the administration’.
Spoločnosť uvádza príklad letiska Shannon v Írsku.
Belgium maintains that, given the lack of a complaint by the Commission in its 2004 decision, BSCA did receive precise assurances that the subsidy was not likely to constitute State aid.
Letisko Shannon spoločnosti Ryanair počas určitého obdobia poskytovalo výhody, ktoré sa však nepredĺžili.
Belgium in particular relies on recital 214 of the 2004 decision, in which the Commission stated that it ‘does not dispute the legitimate possibility of the Walloon authorities continuing to bear the cost of the fire and maintenance services’.
Spoločnosť Ryanair sa rozhodla presunúť svoje činnosti na iného letisko a letisko Shannon nezískalo očakávanú primeranú návratnosť investícií.
The Commission takes the view that the lack of a complaint about the aid granted to BSCA in its 2004 decision cannot constitute a ‘precise assurance’.
595, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52: „Keďže prípadné porušenie záväzku, ktorý členskému štátu vyplýva zo zmluvy, zo strany tohto členského štátu v súvislosti so zákazom stanoveným v článku 92 nemožno odôvodniť okolnosťou, že tento záväzok nesplnili aj iné členské štáty.
The Commission notes that neither the 2002 opening decision nor the 2004 final decision concerned the measures granted to BSCA.
Vplyv viacerých narušení hospodárskej súťaže na obchod medzi členskými štátmi sa vzájomne neneutralizuje, ale naopak má kumulatívny účinok, čo prehlbuje škodlivé dôsledky na spoločný trh“ (bod 24).
As regards recital 214 of the 2004 decision, the Commission stresses that this recital must be read in context.
Sadzby účtované letiskami Frankfurt-Hahn a Londýn Stansted sú údajne vyššie a zľavy nižšie, hoci Ryanair z letiska v Londýne zabezpečuje spojenia do 49 destinácií a z letiska Frankfurt-Hahn do 15, zatiaľ čo z letiska Charleroi len do deviatich destinácií.
It would appear that, in said context, the recital in question cannot be regarded as approving the measure with regard to the State aid rules, but only as explaining the reason why it is not the conformity of this measure with the State aid rules that is being examined by the Commission, but rather the uncertainty about the funding by the Region of certain services within the BSCA business plan, for the purposes of applying the market economy operator test to the 2001 contracts.
Rozsudok z 12. decembra 2000 vo veci T-128/89, Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
As stated in recitals 397 to 399 of this decision, the Commission disputes that it can be concluded from recitals 182 and 183 of the decision on Leipzig/Halle airport that the Commission has in the past taken the view that tasks comparable to maintenance and traffic safety, as defined in the Region/BSCA agreement, fall within the public policy remit.
2000, s.
Foreseeability of the change to the pattern of conduct
II-3929, ECLI:EU:C:2000:290.
As stated by the Court of Justice [237], ‘if a prudent and alert economic operator could have foreseen the adoption of a Community measure likely to affect his interests, he cannot plead that principle if the measure is adopted [238]’.
Rozsudok zo 14. januára 2004, Fleuren Compost BV/Komisia, T-109/01, Zb. s.
According to Belgium, there was nothing to indicate to BSCA that the Commission was going to re-examine, in 2012, a measure on which it had not expressed any reservations in 2004, and which the General Court did not question in 2008.
II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, bod 18.
The Commission refutes having adopted a position on the measures granted to BSCA by adopting the 2004 decision.
Rozhodnutie Komisie 2008/948/ES z 23. júla 2008 o opatreniach Nemecka v prospech spoločnosti DHL a letiska Lipsko/Halle C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (Ú. v.
As a result, the 2012 decision does not constitute a change to its pattern of conduct.
EÚ L 346, 23.12.2008, s.
The Commission also refutes that the present decision constitutes a change to its decision-making practice concerning the distinction between economic activities and non-economic activities.
1), odôvodnenie 291.
As regards the decision on Leipzig/Halle airport cited by Belgium to prove the alleged change to the Commission's pattern of conduct, the Commission refutes that it can concluded from that decision that it has in the past taken the view that tasks comparable to maintenance and traffic safety fall within the public policy remit (see recitals 397 to 399).
Pozri prílohu 3 k pripomienkam Belgicka zaslaným 23. mája 2012.
In conclusion, the Commission takes the view that recovery of the unlawful and incompatible aid granted to BSCA is not contrary to the principle of legitimate expectations.
Rozhodnutie 2008/948/ES, odôvodnenie 182.
CONCLUSION AND QUANTIFICATION OF THE AID TO BE RECOVERED FROM BSCA
Rozsudok z 24. marca 2011, Freistaat Sachsen/Komisia, T-443/08 a T-455/08, Zb.
Aid unlawfully granted to BSCA
2011 s. II-1311, bod 225.
The Commission finds that, by adopting the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, Belgium unlawfully granted aid to BSCA in breach of Article 108(3) TFEU.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 89.
The market price fee is the fee that BSCA should have paid so that each of the two measures (the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision) has a zero net present value for the Region-SOWAER.
2003, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, s.
The Commission has determined the market price fee in line with the reasoning given in Section 6.1.2.2, which has shown that the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision resulted in a concession fee below what a market economy operator guided by profitability prospects would have required.
I-7447.
The Commission has taken into account that, on the signature of the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement, a prudent operator would not have required BSCA to pay a fee reflecting the investments that SOWAER undertook to make under that agreement until the investments had been made and BSCA was earning the expected revenue from those investments.
Článok 6, § 1, X, 7o zákona o inštitucionálnej reforme, M. S., 15. augusta 1980, s. 9434.
A prudent operator would have agreed to the fee increasing only when the new investments could be used by the airport manager.
V súčasnosti spoločnosť Belgocontrol.
Otherwise, the airport manager might experience cash flow difficulties during the years when it was not yet able to earn operating revenue from the new infrastructure.
M. S., 9. marca 1990, s. 4439.
The Commission also finds that the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement provided for an increase in the concession fee in 2007, i.e. two years after the planned commissioning of the new terminal (2005).
Smernica Rady 96/82/ES z 9. decembra 1996 o kontrole nebezpečenstiev veľkých havárií s prítomnosťou nebezpečných látok (Ú. v.
Consequently, the Commission takes the view that a prudent operator would have agreed to BSCA paying the fee set by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement up to two years after the end of the year of commissioning of the new terminal (i.e. in 2007), but would have required BSCA to pay a market price fee after that date, i.e. a fee allowing the entity Region-SOWAER to achieve a zero net present value over the whole period.
ES L 10, 14.1.1997, s. 13), nazývaná smernica Seveso.
Table 31 shows:
Čo nie je prípad letísk.
the variable concession fees expected from BSCA under the provisions in force at the time when the 2002 measure was granted [239];
Odôvodnenie 182.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation [240], which BSCA should have paid from 2007 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2002 agreements [241];
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 2320/2002 zo 16. decembra 2002 o ustanovení spoločných pravidiel v oblasti bezpečnostnej ochrany civilného letectva (Ú. v.
the additional concession fee, conceived as an annual fixed amount indexed at a rate of 2 % per year reflecting inflation, which BSCA should have paid from 2008 so that the concession fees payable by BSCA correspond to the market price concession fee in return for the 2003 investment decision [242];(a + b + c) represents the expected market price concession fees: their amounts are such that the net present value of the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision is zero.
ES L 355, 30.12.2002, s. 1).
Table 31
Článok 5.1.
Expected market price concession fees
Príloha 15 k listu Belgicka z 24. februára 2014.
Concession fees expected from BSCA at the time when the 2002 measure was granted
Správa schválená valónskou vládou 8. novembra 2000, s. 2.
Concession fees to be added so that the NPV of the 2003 investment decision equals 0
EÚ L 312, 29.11.2005, s.
(a + b + c) Market price concession fees
67).
The Commission has decided that the two-year delay in the work should be covered by the Region and SOWAER, and not by BSCA, as those entities were responsible for making the investments.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 103.
As a result, the Commission has taken the view that BSCA should have paid the market price concession fee from the end of 2009 only, without, however, this concession fee being increased as it should have been from the end of 2007, as stipulated by the 2002 SOWAER/BSCA agreement.
Pracovný dokument útvarov Komisie, Často kladené otázky týkajúce sa rozhodnutia Komisie z 28. novembra 2005 o uplatňovaní článku 86 ods. 2 Zmluvy o ES na štátnu pomoc vo forme náhrady za služby vo verejnom záujme udeľovanej niektorým podnikom povereným poskytovaním služieb všeobecného hospodárskeho záujmu, SEC(2007) 1516 v konečnom znení, s. 6.
It is the variable fees actually payable by BSCA (to which fees (b) and (c) shown in Table 31 should be added) that must be used to determine the market price concession fees that BSCA should have paid and that it shall pay in the future.
Nariadenie Rady č. 659/1999 z 22. marca 1999 ustanovujúce podrobné pravidlá na uplatňovanie článku 108 zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v.
It turns out that, even though traffic has proven to be much higher than predicted in 2002, the fees actually payable (shown in column (a) of Table 32) correspond to the expected variable concession fees (shown in column (a) of Table 31) due to the cap on the variable concession fee stipulated in 2002.
ES L 83, 27.3.1999, s.
Table 32 shows the elements making up the market price concession fee:
1).
Table 32
Pozri odôvodnenie 10 nariadenia č. 1998/2006 z 15. decembra 2006 o uplatňovaní článkov 87 a 88 zmluvy na pomoc de minimis (Ú. v.
Market price concession fees taking into account the delay in the work [243]
EÚ L 379, 28.12.2006, s.
More generally, beyond 2013, for example for year (2013 + n), the market price concession fee will be: (a) + (9348451 + 2640013) × (1,02)n, i.e. (a) + 11988464 × (1,02)n, where (a) is the variable part of the concession fee payable by BSCA for the year (2013 + n).
5).
As explained at the end of recital 685, for the years 2014 and 2015, part (a) will probably be capped.
Rozhodnutie Komisie z 1. augusta 2006 o usmernení pre uzávierku programov štrukturálnych fondov (2000 – 2006), COM(2006) 3424, neuverejnené, webové sídlo: europa.com.
In these calculations of the net present value and market price concession fee for the 2002 and 2003 measures, the Commission has assumed that there will be no cap after 2015.
Rozsudok zo 14. januára 2004, Fleuren Compost BV/Komisia, T-109/01, Zb. s.
From 2016, part (a) of the market price concession fee will therefore be 35 % of the aviation revenue.
II-127, ECLI:EU:T:2004:4, bod 74.
Based on the assumptions and methods described above and if the concession fee paid by BSCA remains unchanged, the Commission concludes that, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, BSCA has received and will receive up to 31 December 2015 the aid amounts (excluding interest) corresponding to the sum of columns (b) and (c) in Table 32.
Rozsudok z 15. februára 2001, Rakúsko/Komisia, C-99/98, Zb. s.
These aid amounts are indicated in the following table:
I-1101, ECLI:EU:C:2001:94, body 34, 35 a 38.
Table 33
Odôvodnenie 214 rozhodnutia z roku 2004.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 31 December 2015 — excluding interest — if the BSCA concession fee remains unchanged up to 31 December 2015
Spojené veci C-180/98 až C-184/98, Pavlov a i., Zb.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest)
2000, s.
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest)
I-6451, ECLI:EU:C:2000:428.
Total aid (excluding interest)
Rozsudok zo 16. júna 1987 vo veci 118/85, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
As at 1 October 2014, date of this decision, BSCA has received, due to the 2002 agreements and the 2003 investment decision, the following aid amounts [244] (excluding interest):
1987, s.
Table 34
2599, ECLI:EU:C:1987:283, bod 7; rozsudok z 18. júna 1998 vo veci C-35/96, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
Aid amounts received by BSCA up to 30 September 2014 — excluding interest
1998, s.
Aid associated with the 2002 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
I-3851, ECLI:EU:C:1998:303, bod 36; spojené veci C-180/98 až C-184/98 Pavlov a i., ECLI:EU:C:2000:428, bod 75.
Aid associated with the 2003 measure (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Uvedený rozsudok Lipsko/Halle, bod 102 a nasl.
Total aid (excluding interest) received as at 30 September 2014
Rozsudok z 24. marca 2011 v spojených veciach T-455/08, Flughafen Leipzig-Halle GmbH a Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG/Komisia, ECLI:EU:T:2011:117 a T-443/08, Freistaat Sachsen a Land Sachsen-Anhalt/Komisia (ďalej len „rozsudok Lipsko/Halle“), zatiaľ neuverejnený, body 93, 95, 100 a 119.
Given the conclusions in Section 6.3.2 on the compatibility of the aid granted to BSCA, only the difference between the market price fee — calculated according to the methods described in recitals 680 to 683 — and the fee paid by BSCA since 4 April 2014 constitutes aid to be recovered.
2000, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, s. II-3929, potvrdený rozsudkom Súdneho dvora z 24. októbra 2002 vo veci C-82/01P, Zb.
In addition, until the concession fee payable by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price fee, BSCA will continue to receive unlawful and incompatible aid, the amounts of which shall be recovered.
2008, s. II-3643, ECLI:EU:T:2008:585, bod 88.
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2014 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Rozsudok zo 17. februára 1993 v spojených veciach C-159/91, Poucet/AGV a C-160/91, Pistre/Cancava, Zb.
Where N is the number of days between 4 April 2014 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
1993, s. I-637, ECLI:EU:C:1993:63.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest) = (N/365) × aid amount for 2014
Rozsudok z 12. decembra 2000 vo veci T-128/98, ECLI:EU:T:2000:290, Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
= (N/365) × EUR 12228234
2000, s. II-3929.
If the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased during 2015 to the level of the market price concession fee indicated in Table 32, the aid amount to be recovered — excluding interest — will be calculated according to the following formula:
Vec C-364/92, SAT/Control, Zb.
Where N′ is the number of days between 1 January 2015 and the date on which the concession fee paid by BSCA is increased to the level of the market price concession fee,
1994, s.
Aid amount to be recovered (excluding interest)
I-43, ECLI:EU:C:1994:7, bod 30, a vec C-113/07, Selex Sistemi Integrati/Komisia, Zb.
= aid amount to be recovered for 2014 (excluding interest) + aid amount to be recovered for 2015 (excluding interest)
2009, s.
= ((number of days from 4 April to 31 December 2014)/365) × aid amount for 2014 + (N′/365) × aid amount for 2015
I-2207, ECLI:EU:C:2009:191, bod 71.
= (272/365) × 12228234 + (N′/365) × 12472799
Poznámka pod čiarou č. 29 usmernení v oblasti letectva.
= EUR 9112547 + N′ × EUR 34172
Pozri aj rozsudok z 12. decembra 1996, Compagnie nationale Air France/Komisia, T-358/94, Zb.
The Belgian authorities must recover the amount calculated in accordance with the formulas given in recitals 692 and 693 within four months of the date of notification of this decision.
1996, s.
The Belgian authorities must add recovery interest to the amount to be recovered, which shall be calculated from the date on which the aid in question was at the disposal of the undertakings, namely on each effective date of granting of the aid, until the date of its effective recovery [245], in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [246].
II-2109, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, bod 79, rozsudok zo 14. januára 2004, Fleuren Compost BV/Komisia, T-109/01, Zb.
Belgium accepted that only the French version of the decision would be authentic and that the decision would take effect on its notification in French,
2008, ECLI:EU:T:2008:541, s.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
II-297, bod 80, rozsudok z 30. novembra 2009, Francúzsko a France Telecom/Komisia, T-427/04 a T-17/05, Zb.
Article 1
2009, s.