natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission notes that, as regards the compensation awarded by the Tribunal to the claimants, it should have been clear without any doubt to the claimants even before that aid was granted to them through the adoption of the Award, in conjunction with Romanian domestic law giving legal effect in Romania’s domestic legal order to the Award, that the Commission considered payment of that compensation to give rise to unlawful and incompatible State aid.
Obe skupiny článkov sú v podstate totožné.
That position was expressly communicated to the Tribunal on 20 July 2009 and communicated to the claimants.
Na účely tohto rozhodnutia sa pod odkazmi na články 107 a 108 zmluvy v prípade potreby rozumejú odkazy na články 87 a 88 Zmluvy o ES.
As regards the claimants’ claim that they had a legitimate expectation that the EGO 24 were lawful and would remain in place until 1 April 2009, the Commission recalls, as a preliminary matter, that it is the payment of compensation awarded to the claimants by the Tribunal and not EGO 24 that form the basis for this Decision.
V zmluve sa takisto zavádzajú zmeny v terminológii, ako napríklad pojem „Spoločenstvo“ sa nahrádza pojmom „Únia“ a „spoločný trh“ pojmom „vnútorný trh“.
Nevertheless, the Commission adds, for the sake of completeness, that the claimants cannot justifiably claim a legitimate expectation as to the validity and continued existence of that scheme until 1 April 2009.
V tomto rozhodnutí sa bude používať terminológia zmluvy.
As regards that scheme, it was not the Commission, but the Romanian Competition Council, which, by virtue of Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romania Association Council and Romanian Law No 143/1999 on State aid, was responsible for the monitoring and authorisation of the grant of State aid prior to Romania’s accession to the Union.
Ú. v.
The Commission notes in that regard that EGO 24 was notified to the Romanian Competition Council in light of the modifications envisaged by EGO 75 and that the Romanian Competition Council, by its Decision No 244/2000 of 15 May 2000, found those incentives to constitute incompatible State aid.
EÚ C 393, 7.11.2014, s.
It was after the adoption of that decision, on 1 June 2000, that S.C.
27.
European Food SA obtained its PIC, which made it eligible to obtain State aid under the scheme set up by EGO 24 as explained in recital 133.
Vec ICSID č. ARB/05/20, Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRI, SC Multipack SRL/Rumunsko, konečný rozsudok z 11. decembra 2013.
However, that does not mean the aid was granted on that date, as explained in recital 134.
Referenčný výmenný kurz Európskej centrálnej banky z 11. decembra 2013: 1 EUR = 4,45 RON.
It follows from that at the time S.C.
Bilaterálna investičná zmluva nadobudla účinnosť 1. apríla 2003.
European Food SA was granted the unlawful State aid provided by EGO 24, which is in any event after 1 June 2000, it must have been fully aware of the Romanian Competition Council’s decision of 15 May 2000 declaring the EGO 24 incentives to be incompatible State aid.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 4.
Moreover, it must also have been aware of the Europe Agreement, which entered into force on 1 January 1995, and Romanian Law No 143/1999 on State aid, which entered into force on 1 January 2000, both of which prohibited Romania from granting State aid and conferred the power on the Romanian Competition Council to authorise the grant of new State aid.
Referenčný výmenný kurz Európskej centrálnej banky 15. januára 2014: 1 EUR = 4,52 RON.
Absent such an authorisation from the Competition Council and in line with the case-law of the CJEU, which applied by virtue of the Article 64 of the 1995 Europe Agreement, Article 1 of the Implementing Rules to Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romanian Association Council and the acquis communautaire, S.C.
Nariadenie Rady (ES) č. 659/1999 z 22. marca 1999 ustanovujúce podrobné pravidlá na uplatňovanie článku 108 Zmluvy o fungovaní Európskej únie (Ú. v.
European Food SA could never have entertained a legitimate expectation that the incentives granted under EGO 24 constituted compatible State aid, regardless of the subsequent actions of the Romanian Government after Decision No 244/2000 was adopted.
ES L 83, 27.3.1999, s.
The same reasoning obviously applies to Multipack and Starmill, which only obtained their PICs on 17 May 2002, two years after Decision No 244/2000 was adopted.
1).
Thus, the claimants cannot even validly claim a legitimate expectation that the EGO 24 scheme constituted lawful State aid, which the Commission considers irrelevant for the purposes of the present Decision.
Pozri odôvodnenie 3.
Therefore, any payment of the compensation awarded to the claimants by the Tribunal must be recovered by Romania since that payment constitutes unlawful and incompatible State aid.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 2.
As the five claimants, together with the other relevant EFDG companies constitute a single economic unit (see recital 91), the five claimants and the other relevant EFDG companies shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by any one of them to the Romanian state.
Na zablokovaný účet bola prevedená ďalšia suma vo výške 6028608 RON ako náhrada exekučných nákladov.
According to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 the aid to be recovered pursuant to a recovery decision shall include interest at an appropriate rate fixed by the Commission.
Ú. v.
Interest shall be payable from the date on which the unlawful aid was at the disposal of the beneficiary until the date of its recovery.
ES L 357, 31.12.1994, s.
Article 14(3) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 provides that recovery shall be effected without delay and in accordance with the procedures under the national law of the Member State concerned, provided that they allow the immediate and effective execution of the Commission’s decision.
2.
To this effect and in the event of a procedure before national courts, the Member States concerned shall take all necessary steps which are available in their respective legal systems, including provisional measures, without prejudice to Union law.
Pozri tiež článok 2 vykonávacích predpisov k rozhodnutiu Asociačnej rady EÚ – Rumunsko č. 4/2000 z 10. apríla 2001 o prijatí vykonávacích predpisov na účely uplatňovania ustanovení týkajúcich sa štátnej pomoci uvedených v článku 64 ods. 1 bode iii) a ods. 2 v súlade s článkom 64 ods. 3 európskej dohody o pridružení medzi Európskymi spoločenstvami a ich členskými štátmi na jednej strane a Rumunskom na strane druhej, a v článku 9 ods. 1 bode iii) a ods. 2 protokolu 2 o výrobkoch Európskeho spoločenstva uhlia a ocele k tejto dohode (Ú. v.
The Commission observes in this respect that Romania has already offset the amount of RON 337492864 (ca.
ES L 138, 22.5.2001, s.
EUR 76 million [97]) against tax debts owed by one of the claimants, S.C. European Food SA.
16).
The Commission further observes that on 5 January 2015 the court-appointed executor seized RON 36484232 (ca.
Monitorul Oficial, prvá časť, č. 73 z 12. apríla 1993.
EUR 8,1 million [98]) from Romania’s Ministry of Finance and subsequently transferred RON 34004232 (ca.
Rada pre hospodársku súťaž bola a je nezávislým administratívnym orgánom v oblasti právnych predpisov hospodárskej súťaže a právnych predpisov štátnej pomoci, ktorý má regulačné a vyšetrovacie právomoci podobné Európskej komisii v oblasti právnych predpisov hospodárskej súťaže a právnych predpisov štátnej pomoci.
EUR 7,56 million) in equal parts to three of the five claimants, and kept the remainder as compensation for execution costs.
Úrad pre hospodársku súťaž bol špecializovaným orgánom podriadeným vláde.
Between 5 February and 25 February 2015, the court-appointed executor seized a further RON 9197482 (ca.
Medzi hlavné povinnosti Úradu patrilo: i) vykonávanie vyšetrovaní a preskúmavanie účinného presadzovania právnych ustanovení a rozhodnutí Rady pre hospodársku súťaž; ii) dohliadanie nad určovaním cien zo strany verejných subjektov a verejných spoločností; a iii) zaistenie transparentnosti štátnej pomoci a monitorovanie a podávanie správ o výdavkoch v oblasti štátnej pomoci.
EUR 2 million) [99] from the bank accounts of the Ministry of Finance.
Asociačná rada EÚ – Rumunsko na základe článku 1 vykonávacích pravidiel k rozhodnutiu č. 4/2000 vymenovala Radu pre hospodársku súťaž a Úrad pre hospodársku súťaž za rumunské subjekty zodpovedné za preskúmavanie a posudzovanie zlučiteľnosti štátnej pomoci s európskou dohodou o pridružení z roku 1995.
In addition, the Commission takes note of the fact that the Romanian authorities have voluntarily transferred RON 472788675 (ca.
Civilné rozhodnutie č. 26; pozri rozsudok, bod 219.
EUR 106,5 million [100]) (including the costs of court appointed executor of RON 6028608) into a blocked account in the name of the five claimants.
Pozri rozsudok, bod 224.
Those sums, as well as any further payments to the claimants in fulfilment of the Award which have taken or will take place, must be recovered by Romania.
Spoločné stanovisko Európskej únie z 21. novembra 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, s.
Accordingly, the Commission,
4.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Komisia počas prístupového procesu žiadajúceho štátu pravidelne navrhuje a Rada prijme takzvané spoločné stanoviská, v ktorých sa hodnotí pokrok kandidátskej krajiny smerom k dodržiavaniu prístupových kritérií.
Article 1
Odôvodňovacia sprievodná správa k nariadeniu EGO 94/2004, 26. augusta 2004, s.
The payment of the compensation awarded by the arbitral tribunal established under the auspices of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) by award of 11 December 2013 in Case No ARB/05/20 Micula a.o. v Romania [101] to the single economic unit comprising Viorel Micula, Ioan Micula, S.C.
12 – 13.
Multipack, European Drinks SA, Rieni Drinks SA, Scandic Distilleries SA, Transilvania General Import-Export S.R.L., and West Leasing S.R.L constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty which is incompatible with the internal market.Article 2
Článok 9 ods. 1 bilaterálnej investičnej zmluvy.
Romania shall not pay out any incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 and shall recover any incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 which has already been paid out to any one of the entities constituting the single economic unit benefiting from that aid in partial implementation or execution of the arbitral award of 11 December 2013, as well as any aid paid out to any one of the entities constituting the single economic unit benefiting from that aid in further implementation of the arbitral award of 11 December 2013 that the Commission has not been made aware of or that is paid out after the date of this Decision.
Rozsudok, bod 725.
Multipack, European Drinks SA, Rieni Drinks SA, Scandic Distilleries SA, Transilvania General Import-Export S.R.L., and West Leasing S.R.L shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by any one of them.
Rozsudok, bod 827.
The sums to be recovered are those resulting from the implementation or execution of the award of 11 December 2013 (principal and interest).
Rozsudok, bod 827.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Rozsudok, bod 872.
Romania shall provide the exact dates on which the aid provided by the state was put at the disposal of the respective beneficiaries.
Rozsudok, bod 875 a nasl.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [102].
Táto suma sa vypočítala za dovozy vykonané počas obdobia od 22. februára 2005 a 31. marca 2009.
Romania shall ensure that no further payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be effected with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 28.
Article 3
Žalobcovia požiadali o náhradu škody za zvýšené náklady na PET.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Tieto nároky však súd odmietol na základe toho, že v súvislosti s dovozom PET žalobcovia v skutočnosti nikdy nevyužívali nástroj týkajúci sa surovín.
Romania shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
Táto suma sa vypočítala na základe ciel účtovaných za dovezený cukor, a ktorým by sa predišlo, ak by mal žalobca príležitosť tvoriť zásoby cukru pred plánovaným uplynutím platnosti nariadenia EGO (t. j.
Article 4
1. apríla 2009).
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Romania shall submit the following information:
Referenčná hodnota vychádza zo zásob v roku 2004/2005.
the total amount of aid received by each entity mentioned in Article 1 of this Decision;
Ušlý zisk je vypočítaný za obdobie 2004 – 2008 v prípade ušlých trhových podielov nealkoholických nápojov a iných výrobkov, ktoré obsahovali cukor.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Tvrdenie spočíva v tom, že náklady sa po zrušení stimulov v nariadení EGO zvýšili, čo viedlo k vyšším cenám a teda k nižším trhovým podielom.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Vec č. 3456/3/2014, súd v Bukurešti.
Romania shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Nariadenie vydané súdom v Bukurešti vo veci č. 9261/3/2014, oddiel IV Obč.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Vec č. 15755/3/2014, súd v Bukurešti, sekcia III Obč.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Vec č. 15755/3/2014/a1, odvolací súd v Bukurešti, sekcia IV Obč.
Article 5
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 36.
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Referenčný výmenný kurz Európskej centrálnej banky 5. januára 2015: 1 EUR = 4,49 RON.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2015.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 38.
For the Commission
Referenčný výmenný kurz Európskej centrálnej banky 9. marca 2015: 1 EUR = 4,44 RON.
Member of the Commission
Vec č.1-14-cv-600 Viorel Micula/Rumunská vláda v United States District Court for the District of Columbia – Návrh na potvrdenie rozsudku ICSID a vydanie rozsudku.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 7.
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
Pozri poznámku pod čiarou č. 40.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Pozri rozhodnutie o začatí konania, odôvodnenie 39.
The Treaty also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
Vec 61/79 Amministrazione delle finanze dello Stato/Denkavit italiana, EU:C:1980:100.
The terminology of the Treaty will be used throughout this Decision.
Rozhodnutie Komisie 2008/408/ES z 20. novembra 2007 o štátnej pomoci C 36/A/06 (ex NN 38/06), ktorú Taliansko poskytlo spoločnostiam ThyssenKrupp, Cementir a Nuove Terni Industrie Chimiche (Ú. v.
OJ C 393, 7.11.2014, p.
EÚ L 144, 4.6.2008, s.
27.
37).
ICSID Case No ARB/05/20, Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, SC European Food SA, SC Starmill SRI, SC Multipack SRL v Romania, final award of 11 December 2013.
Odkaz na vec T-68/03 Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies, EU:T:2007:253, bod 42.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 11 December 2013: 1 EUR = 4,45 RON.
Vec C-487/06 P British Aggregates/Komisia, EU:C:2008:757, body 85 a 89 a citovaná judikatúra, a vec C-279/08 P Komisia/Holandsko (NOx), EU:C:2011:551, bod 51.
The BIT entered into force on 1 April 2003.
Spojené veci C-180/98 až C-184/98 Pavlov a i., EU:C:2000:428, bod 74.
See footnote 4.
Vec C-170/83 Hydrotherm, EU:C:1984:271, bod 11.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 15 January 2014: 1 EUR = 4,52 RON.
Pozri aj Vec T-137/02 Pollmeier Malchow/Komisia, EU:T:2004:304, bod 50.
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Vec C-480/09 P Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA/Komisia, EU:C:2010:787 body 47 až 55; Vec C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a i., EU:C:2006:8, body 112.
1).
Pozri rozsudok, body 935 – 936 a 943.
See recital 3.
Vec C-170/83 Hydrotherm, EU:C:1984:271, bod 10.
See footnote 2.
Vec C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a i., EU:C:2006:8, bod 112.
An additional RON 6028608 have been transferred on the blocked account as compensation for the execution costs.
Vec C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a i., EU:C:2006:8, bod 114.
OJ L 357, 31.12.1994, p.
Pozri odôvodnenia 87 a 88.
2.
Vec C-39/94 SFEI a i., EU:C:1996:285, bod 60; vec C-342/96 Španielsko/Komisia, EU:C:1999:210, bod 41.
See also Article 2 of the Implementing Rules to Decision No 4/2000 of the EU-Romania Association Council of 10 April 2001 adopting the implementing rules for the application of the provisions on State aid referred to in Articles 64(1)(iii) and (2) pursuant to Article 64(3) of the Europe Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Romania, of the other part, and in Article 9(1)(iii) and (2) of Protocol 2 on European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) products to that Agreement (OJ L 138, 22.5.2001, p.
Rozsudok, bod 917.
16).
Rozsudok, bod 928.
Monitorul Oficial, first part, No 73 of 12 April 1993.
Rozsudok, bod 953.
The Competition Council was and is an autonomous administrative authority in the field of competition law and State aid law with regulatory and investigative powers, similar to the European Commission in the field of competition and State aid law.
Pozri odôvodnenie 27 opisu splatných súm v rozhodcovskom rozsudku.
The Competition Office was a specialised authority subordinate to the government.
Súd dospel k záveru, že zrušením stimulov v nariadení EGO 24 sa porušili oprávnené očakávania žalobcov ešte skôr, ako zohľadnil primeranosť alebo transparentnosť opatrení Rumunska (rozsudok, body 725, 726; primeranosť a transparentnosť boli zohľadnené len v bode 727 a nasl. a v bode 837 a nasl.).
The main responsibilities of the Office were: (i) to carry out investigations and to survey the effective enforcement of legal provisions and the decisions of the Competition Council; (ii) to supervise the setting of prices by public entities and public companies; and (iii) to ensure transparency of State aid, and to monitor and report State aid expenditure.
Neexistuje teda žiadny základ domnievať sa, ako tvrdia žalobcovia, že zistenie súdu týkajúce sa porušenia bilaterálnej investičnej zmluvy bolo podmienené neprimeranosťou zachovávania povinností investorov v nariadení EGO 24 alebo nedostatočnou transparentnosťou opatrení Rumunska.
By Article 1 of the implementing rules to Decision No 4/2000 the EU-Romania Association Council designated the Competition Council and Competition Office as the Romanian entities responsible for surveying and assessing the compatibility of State aid with the 1995 Europe Agreement.
Rozsudok, body 953, 961, 971, 984, 1016, 1020, 1136.
Civil Decision No 26; see Award, paragraph 219.
Spojené veci 106/87 až 120/87 Asteris, EU:C:1988:457.
See Award, paragraph 224.
Spojené veci 106/87 až 120/87 Asteris, EU:C:1988:457, bod 23.
European Union Common Position of 21 November 2001, CONF-RO 43/01, p.
Pozri rozhodnutie Komisie zo 16. júna 2004 o holandskej pomoci v prospech Akzo-Nobel s cieľom minimalizovať prepravu chlóru (Vec N 304/2003), súhrnné oznámenie v Ú. v.
4.
EU C 81, 2.4.2005, s.
During the accession process of an applicant country, the Commission regularly proposes and the Council adopts so-called common positions, in which the progress of the candidate country towards compliance with the accession criteria is evaluated.
4; pozri aj rozhodnutie Komisie z 20. decembra 2006 o holandskej pomoci pre premiestnenie spoločnosti na demontáž automobilov Steenbergen (Vec N 575/05), súhrnné oznámenie v Ú. v.
Article 9(1) of the BIT.
1.
Award, paragraph 725.
Komisia by z rovnakých dôvodov považovala za neplatné aj bilaterálne investičné zmluvy v rámci EÚ v základe rozhodcovského konania uvedeného v poznámke pod čiarou č. 53 žiadosti.
Award, paragraph 827.
Pozri aj pracovný dokument útvarov Komisie z 15. apríla 2013 o voľnom pohybe kapitálu v EÚ, SWD(2013)146 final, strany 11 a 14; pracovný dokument útvarov Komisie z 18. marca 2014 o voľnom pohybe kapitálu v EÚ, SWD(2014)115 final, s.
See footnote 24.
12; a Európska komisia, Monitorovacie činnosti a analýza, bilaterálne investičné zmluvy medzi členskými štátmi EÚ (bilaterálne investičné zmluvy v rámci EÚ) 2012; dostupné na lokalite: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/capital/analysis/monitoring_activities_and_analysis/index_en.htm.
Award, paragraph 872.
Stanovisko z 28. apríla 2005 v spojených veciach C-346/03 a C-529/03 Atzori, ECLI:EU:C:2005:256, bod 198.
Award, paragraphs 875 et seq.
Vec T-384/08 Elliniki Nafpigokataskevastiki AE Chartofylakeiou/Komisia, EU:T:2011:650, a vec T-565/08 Corsica Ferries/Komisia, EU:T:2012:415, body 23, 114 a 120 až 131.
This amount is calculated for imports made during 22 February 2005 and 31 March 2009.
Pozri aj analogicky vec C-111/10 Komisia/Rada, EU:C:2013:785, bod 44.
See footnote 28.
Vec C-119/05 Lucchini, EU:C:2007:434, bod 59.
The claimants asked for compensation for the increased cost of PET.
Vec C-280/00 Altmark Trans, EU:C:2003:415, bod 84.
However, the Tribunal rejected this claims on the basis that the claimants had never in fact benefited from the Raw Materials Facility with respect to PET imports.
Vec T-351/02 Deutsche Bahn AG/Komisia, EU:T:2006:104, bod 101.
This amount is calculated on the basis of custom duties charged on imported sugar and that would have been avoided, if the claimant had had the opportunity to stockpile sugar before the envisaged expiry of the EGO (i.e. 1 April 2009).
Vec 730/79 Phillip Morris, EU:C:1980:209, bod 11.
The benchmark is based on stockpiles in 2004/2005.
Spojené veci T-298/97, T-312/97 atď. Alzetta, EU:T:2000:151, bod 80.
Lost profits are calculated over the period 2004-2008 for loss of market shares of soft drinks and other products that did contain sugar.
Vec T-288/97 Friulia Venezia Giulia, EU:T:2001:115, bod 41.
The claim is that after the revocation of the EGO incentives, the costs increased leading to higher prices and thus to lower market shares.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) č. 1219/2012 z 12. decembra 2012, ktorým sa ustanovujú prechodné opatrenia pre bilaterálne investičné dohody medzi členskými štátmi a tretími krajinami (Ú. v.
Case No 3456/3/2014, Bucharest Tribunal.
EÚ L 351, 20.12.2012, s.
Order issued by Bucharest Tribunal in Case No 9261/3/2014, Section IV Civil.
40).
Case No 15755/3/2014, Bucharest Tribunal, Section III Civil.
Článok 3 ods. 1 písm. e) zmluvy.
Case No 15755/3/2014/a1, Bucharest Court of Appeal, Section IV Civil.
Vec C-129/12 Magdeburger Mühlenwerke, EU:C:2013:200, bod 40.
See footnote 36.
Preklad pôvodného ustanovenia, ktorým sa stanovuje nástroj týkajúci sa surovín (ktorý predstavuje investičný stimul, zrušením ktorého vznikli škody priznané žalobcom v rozsudku) do anglického jazyka je uvedený v bode 148 rozsudku.
Reference exchange rate of the European Central Bank on 5 January 2015: 1 EUR = 4,49 RON.
Podľa tohto prekladu sa v článku 6 ods. 1 písm. b) stanovuje, že „Privately held companies, Romanian legal entities, as well as small or family business, authorised pursuant to the Decree-Law no.