natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the assessment in section 6.5, the Commission considers that all common conditions for compatibility pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty have been satisfied in the present case.
EÚ L 346, 23.12.2008, s.
Therefore, the Commission concludes that those measures are compatible with the internal market on the basis of Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty to the extent that they are limited to the financing of the funding gap of the investment project.
1), a preto nie sú predmetom tohto preskúmania.
The Commission notes that on 17 June 2014, Germany informed the Commission that it exceptionally accepts that this decision is adopted in the English language,
Tento údaj podlieha služobnému tajomstvu.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Rozhodnutie o schválení plánu zameraného na južnú vzletovú a pristávaciu dráhu a odbavovaciu plochu zodpovedného nemeckého orgánu územného plánovania zo 4. novembra 2004 a prvá zmena tohto rozhodnutia z 9. decembra 2005.
Article 1
Letisko Lipsko/Halle má dve rolovacie dráhy, ktoré križujú dopravné trasy (diaľnicu A14, vysokorýchlostnú železničnú trať, štvorprúdovú štátnu cestu), v dôsledku čoho sa musia pre tieto rolovacie dráhy vybudovať mosty.
The shareholder loans granted to Flughafen Leipzig/Halle GmbH do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 2320/2002 zo 16. decembra 2002 o ustanovení spoločných pravidiel v oblasti bezpečnostnej ochrany civilného letectva (Ú. v.
Article 2
ES L 355, 30.12.2002 s.
To the extent that the capital injections into Flughafen Leipzig/Halle GmbH cover costs falling public policy remit for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) LuftSiG and costs of the heliport, they do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
1).
To the extent that the capital injections into Flughafen Leipzig/Halle GmbH are limited to the funding gap of the investment project and do not cover costs relating to the public policy remit set out in paragraph 1, they constitute State aid which is compatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Do 1. apríla 2011.
To the extent that the amount of the capital injections exceeds the amounts declared compatible with the internal market in paragraph 1 and 2, they constitute State aid which is incompatible with the internal market pursuant to Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Oznámenie Komisie o revízii spôsobu stanovenia referenčných a diskontných sadzieb (Ú. v.
Article 3
EÚ C 14, 19.1.2008, s.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
6).
Done at Brussels, 23 July 2014.
Na základe odhadov pred rokom 2011.
For the Commission
Na základe odhadov na rok 2011.
Vice-President
Vec T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Treaty).
2000, s.
The two sets of Articles are in substance identical.
II-3929.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 Treaty should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Spojené veci T-443/08 a T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG a Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH/Komisia, (rozsudok vo veci „letisko Lipsko-Halle“), Zb.
The Treaty also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
2011, s.
The terminology of the Treaty will be used throughout this Decision.
II-1311.
OJ C 284, 28.9.2011, p.
Rozhodnutie Komisie zo 7. marca 2007 vo veci štátnej pomoci N620/06 Nemecko/regionálne letisko Memmingen-Allgäu (Ú. v.
6.
EÚ C 133, 15.6.2007, s.
See footnote 2.
8).
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p.
Nariadenie Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 300/2008 z 11. marca 2008 o spoločných pravidlách v oblasti bezpečnostnej ochrany civilného letectva a o zrušení nariadenia (ES) č. 2320/2002 z 11. marca 2008 o spoločných pravidlách v oblasti bezpečnostnej ochrany civilného letectva a o zrušení nariadenia (ES) č. 2320/2002 (Ú. v.
3).
EÚ L 97, 9.4.2008, s.
Application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement to State aids in the aviation sector (OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p.
72).
5).
Úverová ponuka od Sachsen LB zo 14.
Communication from the Commission — Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p.
1.
1).
2010 zahŕňa marže v rozpätí od 55 bázických bodov ročne do 80 bázických bodov ročne v závislosti od výšky úveru (čím vyššia je výška úveru, tým nižšia je ponúknutá marža).
OJ C 113, 15.4.2014, p.
Úverová ponuka od Nord LB z 11.
FLH’s main shareholder is Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG, which holds a 94 percent participation in FLH.
2010 zahŕňa rizikové marže v rozpätí od 22 bázických bodov ročne až do 238 bázických bodov ročne v závislosti od výšky úveru.
The remaining shares are owned by Freistaat Sachsen, Landkreis Nordsachen and Stadt Schkeuditz.
Odôvodnenie 95 rozhodnutia o začatí konania.
There are no private shareholders.
Dôverné obchodné informácie.
The shareholders of MFAG are: 76,64 percent Freistaat Sachsen, 18,54 percent Land Sachsen-Anhalt, 2,52 percent Stadt Dresden, 0,2 percent Stadt Halle, 2,1 percent Stadt Leipzig.
Akčný plán pre kapacitu, účinnosť a bezpečnosť letísk v Európe, COM(2006) 819 final, 24. januára 2007.
The capital contributions from the public shareholders of FLH financing the construction of the new southern runway and other measures amounting up to EUR 350 million and decided until 2006, have been already assessed and found compatible with the internal market in Commission Decision 2008/948/EC of 23 July 2008 on measures by Germany to assist DHL and Leipzig Halle Airport C 48/06 (ex N 227/06) (OJ L 346, 23.12.2008, p.
Diskontná sadzba bola stanovená použitím modelu oceňovania kapitálových aktív: re = rf + ßi (MRP).Rf = základná sadzba = […] % k 30.
1) and are therefore not within the scope of the present investigation.
12.
Covered by the obligation of professional secrecy.
2005.ßi = Beta faktor = […] k 1.
Planning approval decision for the southern take-off and landing runway and apron of a responsible German planning authority of 4 November 2004 and the first amendment to that decision of 9 December 2005.
1.
Leipzig/Halle airport has two taxiways which cross traffic routes (A14 motorway, high speed rail line, 4-lane national road), meaning that bridges have to be built for the taxiways.
2006.MRP = riziková prirážka pred zdanením = […] % k 1.
Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security (OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p.
1.
1).
2006.
Until 1 April 2011.
Čistá súčasná hodnota likvidnej medzery/čistá súčasná hodnota investícií = 166,9 milióna EUR/189,4 milióna EUR = 88,10 %.
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method of setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p.
Časový rámec investícií je totožný s financovaním prostredníctvom kapitálových injekcií.
6).
Čistá súčasná hodnota likvidnej medzery/čistá súčasná hodnota investícií = 142,1 milióna EUR/189,4 milióna EUR = 75,00 %.
Based on estimates before 2011.
Rozhodnutie 2008/948/ES.
Based on the 2011 estimates.
Pozri vec C-35/96, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
Case T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris v Commission, [2000] ECR II-3929.
1998, s.
Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission (‘Leipzig-Halle airport’ judgment), [2011] ECR II-1311.
I-3851 a veci C-180/98 až 184/98, Pavlov, Zb.
Commission decision of 7 March 2007 in State aid case N620/06 Germany Memmingen/Allgäu Regional airport (OJ C 133, 15.6.2007, p.
2000, s.
8).
I-6451.
Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 (OJ L 97, 9.4.2008, p.
Pozri oznámenie Komisie o uplatňovaní pravidiel štátnej pomoci Európskej únie na náhrady za služby všeobecného hospodárskeho záujmu (Ú. v.
72).
EÚ C 8, 11.1.2012, s.
Loan offer from Sachsen LB from 14.1.2010 proposing margins from 55 bps p.a. up to 80 basis points per annum depending on the loan amount (the higher the loan amount, the lower the margin offered).
4), časť 2.1 a súvisiacu judikatúru, zvlášť spojené veci C-180/98 až C-184/98, Pavlov a iní, Zb.
Loan offer from Nord LB from 11.1.2010 proposing risk margins from 22 basis points per annum up to 238 basis points per annum depending on the loan amount.
2000, s.
Recital 95 of the opening decision.
I-6451, a pozri aj vec C-222/04, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze a iní, Zb.
Confidential business information.
2006, s.
An action plan for airport capacity, efficiency and safety in Europe, COM(2006) 819 final, 24 January 2007.
I-289; vec C-205/03 P, FENIN/Komisia, Zb.
The discount rate was established using the Capital Asset Pricing Model: re = rf + ßi (MRP)Rf = Basis rate = […] % on 30.12.2005ßi = Beta factor = […] on 1.1.2006MRP = Markt Risk Premium before taxes = […] % on 1.1.2006.
2006, s.
NPV of the funding gap/NPV of the investments = EUR 166,9 million/EUR 189,4 million = 88,10 %.
I-6295, a vec C-49/07, MOTOE, Zb.
Investment time frame is identical with the financing through capital injections.
2008, s.
NPV of the funding gap/NPV of the investments = EUR 142,1 million/EUR 189,4 million = 75,00 %.
I-4863.
Decision 2008/948/EC.
Vec C-118/85, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
See Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851 and Cases C180/98 to 184/98 Pavlov [2000] ECR I-6451.
1987, s.
See Communication from the Commission on the application of the European Union State aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p.
2599, bod 7; vec C-35/96, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
4) part 2.1 and associated case law, in particular joined Cases C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavlov and Others, [2000] ECR I-6451, but see also Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze and Others [2006] ECR I-289; Case C-205/03 P FENIN v Commission [2006] ECR I-6295, and Case C-49/07 MOTOE [2008] ECR I-4863.
1998, s.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy, [1987] ECR 2599, paragraph 7; Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy, [1998] ECR I-3851, paragraph 36; Pavlov and Others, paragraph 75.
I-3851, bod 36; Pavlov a iní, bod 75.
Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78 Van Landewyck, [1980] ECR 3125, paragraph 88; Case C-244/94 FFSA and Others, [1995] ECR I-4013, paragraph 21; and Case C-49/07 MOTOE, [2008] ECR I-4863, paragraphs 27 and 28.
Spojené veci 209/78 až 215/78 a 218/78, Van Landewyck, Zb.
Case T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris v Commission, [2000] ECR II-3929, confirmed by Case C-82/01, [2002] ECR I-9297, paragraphs 75-79.
1980, s.
Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission (‘Leipzig-Halle airport’ judgment), [2011] ECR II-1311, in particular paragraphs 93 and 94; confirmed by Case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig/Halle v Commission, [2012] not yet reported.
3125, bod 88; vec C-244/94, FFSA a iní, Zb.
See Leipzig/Halle airport judgment, paragraph 106.
1995, s.
Leipzig/Halle airport judgment, paragraph 102 and following.
I-4013, bod 21 a vec C-49/07 MOTOE, Zb.
Case C-205/03P FENIN v Commission [2006] ECR I-6295, paragraph 88; and Leipzig/Halle airport judgment, paragraph 95.
2008, s.
Leipzig/Halle airport judgment, paragraph 98.
I-4863, body 27 a 28.
Case C-118/85 Commission v Italy, [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8, and Case C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, [1988] ECR 2479, paragraph 18.
Vec T-128/98 Aéroports de Paris/Komisia, Zb.
See, in particular, Case C-364/92 SAT/Eurocontrol, [1994] ECR I-43, paragraph 30 and Case C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati v Commission, [2009] ECR I-2207, paragraph 71.
2000, s.
Case C-343/95 Cali & Figli v Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, [1997] ECR I-1547.
II-3929, potvrdené vecou C-82/01, Zb.
Commission Decision N 309/02 of 19 March 2003, Aviation security — compensation for costs incurred following the attacks of 11 September 2001 (OJ C 148, 25.6.2003, p.
2002, s.
7).
I-9297, body 75 – 79.
Commission Decision N 438/02 of 16 October 2002, Aid in support of public authority functions in the port sector (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002, p.
Spojené veci T-443/08 a T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG a Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH/Komisia, (rozsudok vo veci „letisko Lipsko-Halle“), Zb.
2).
2011, s.
See among others Case C-172/03 Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck, [2005] ECR I-01627, paragraph 36, and case-law cited in that judgment.
II-1311, a najmä body 93 a 94; potvrdené vecou C-288/11 P, Mitteldeutsche Flughafen a Flughafen Leipzig-Halle/Komisia, Zb.
According to Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security (OJ L 355, 30.12.2002, p.
2012, zatiaľ neuverejnené.
1).
Pozri rozsudok vo veci letisko Lipsko/Halle, bod 106.
Commission decision of 20 February 2014 in State aid case SA.35847 (2012/N) — Czech Republic — Ostrava Airport, not yet published in the OJ, recital 16.
Rozsudok vo veci letisko Lipsko/Halle, bod 102 a nasledujúce.
§27(d)(1) LuftVG: ‘Flugsicherungsdienste und die dazu erforderlichen flugsicherungstechnischen Einrichtungen werden an den Flugplätzen vorgehalten, bei denen das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung einen Bedarf aus Gründen der Sicherheit und aus verkehrspolitischen Interessen anerkennt’.
Vec C-205/03 P, FENIN/Komisia, Zb.
Leipzig/Halle judgment, paragraph 115.
2006, s.
Communication of the Commission to the Member States: application of Articles 92 and 93 of the EEC Treaty and of Article 5 of Commission Directive 80/723/EEC to public undertakings in the manufacturing sector (OJ C 307, 13.11.1993, p.
I-6295, bod 88 a rozsudok vo veci letisko Lipsko/Halle, bod 95.
3, point 11).
Rozsudok vo veci letisko Lipsko/Halle, bod 98.
That Communication deals with the manufacturing sector, but is applicable to the other economic sectors.
Vec C-118/85, Komisia/Taliansko, Zb.
See also Case T-16/96 Cityflyer [1998] ECR II-757, paragraph 51.
1987, s.
See, e.g. Moody’s, Updated Summary Guidance for Notching Bonds, Preferred Stocks and Hybrid Securities of Corporate Issuers (February 2007).
2599, body 7 a 8 a vec C-30/87, Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, Zb.
The level of collaterals can be measured as the Loss Given Default (LGD), which is the expected loss in percentage of the debtor’s exposure taking into account recoverable amounts from collateral and the bankruptcy assets; as a consequence the LGD is inversely proportional to the validity of collaterals.
1988, s.
Paper International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in June 2006.
I-2479, bod 18.
The swap rate is the longer maturity equivalent to the Inter-Bank Offered Rate (IBOR rate).
Pozri najmä vec C-364/92, SAT/Eurocontrol, Zb.
It is used in the financial markets as a benchmark rate for establishing the funding rate.
1994, s.
A credit default swap (CDS) is a (tradable) credit derivative contract between two counterparties, the protection buyer and the protection seller, transferring the credit risk on an underlying reference entity from the protection buyer to the protection seller.
I–43, bod 30 a vec C-113/07 P, Selex Sistemi Integrati/Komisia, Zb.
The protection buyer pays every period a premium to the protection seller until maturity of the CDS contract or until a pre-defined credit event occurs on the underlying reference entity (whichever occurs first).
2009, s.
The periodic premium paid by the protection buyer (expressed as a percentage or in terms of basis points of the protected amount, the ‘notional’) is called the CDS spread.
I–2207, bod 71.
CDS spreads can be used as a close proxy for the price of credit risk.
Vec C-343/95, Cali & Figli/Servizi ecologici porto di Genova, Zb.
See e.g. Oxera, Estimating the cost of capital for Dutch water companies, 2011 (p.
1997, s.
3), or Bloomberg data on underwriting fees for bond issuance.
I-1547.
In the remainder of this Decision, a 20 bps fee will be used to arrive at a conservative estimate.
Rozhodnutie Komisie č. 309/02 z 19. marca 2003, letecká bezpečnosť – náhrada nákladov vzniknutých v súvislosti s útokmi z 11. septembra 2001 (Ú. v.
Case C-482/99 France v Commission (‘Stardust Marine’) [2002] ECR I-4397.
EÚ C 148, 25.6.2003, s.
Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, [2011] ECR II-1999, paragraph 108.
7).
Case 78/76, Steinike & Weinlig v Germany, [1977] ECR 595, paragraph 21.
Rozhodnutie Komisie č. 438/02 zo 16. októbra 2002, pomoc orgánom verejnej správy v sektore prístavov (Ú. v.
Case C-39/94 Syndicat français de l’Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others [1996] ECR I-3547, paragraph 60 and case C-342/96 Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-2459, paragraph 41.
ES C 284, 21.11.2002, s.
Case 173/73 Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities [1974] ECR 709, paragraph 13.
2).
Case C-482/99 France v Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397, paragraph 69.
Pozri okrem iného vec C-172/03, Wolfgang Heiser/Finanzamt Innsbruck, Zb.
Case C-305/89 Italy v Commission (ALFA Romeo) [1991] ECR I-1603, paragraph 23; Case T-296/97 Alitalia v Commission [2000] ECR II-03871, paragraph 84.
2005, s.
Case 40/85 Belgium v Commission [1986] ECR I-2321.
I–01627, bod 36 a judikatúru citovanú v tomto rozsudku.
Stardust Marine, paragraph 71.
Podľa nariadenia Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 2320/2002 zo 16. decembra 2002 o ustanovení spoločných pravidiel v oblasti bezpečnostnej ochrany civilného letectva (Ú. v.
Case C-124/10P European Commission v Électricité de France (EDF) [2012], not yet published, paragraph 85.
ES L 355, 30.12.2002, s.
Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest v Commission [1998] ECR II-717.
1).
Leipzig/Halle airport, paragraph 93 and Decision 2008/948/EC, recital 8.
Rozhodnutie Komisie z 20. februára 2014 vo veci štátnej pomoci SA.35847 (2012/N) – Česká republika – letisko Ostrava, zatiaľ neuverejnené v úradnom vestníku, odôvodnenie 16.
Case T-109/01 Fleuren Compost v Commission [2004] ECR II-127.
§ 27 písm. d) ods. 1 LuftVG: „Flugsicherungsdienste und die dazu erforderlichen flugsicherungstechnischen Einrichtungen werden an den Flugplätzen vorgehalten, bei denen das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung einen Bedarf aus Gründen der Sicherheit und aus verkehrspolitischen Interessen anerkennt“.
Point 173 of the 2014 Aviation Guidelines.
Rozsudok vo veci letisko Lipsko/Halle, bod 115.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on EU State Aid Modernisation (SAM), COM(2012) 209 final.
Oznámenie Komisie členským štátom: uplatňovanie článkov 92 a 93 Zmluvy o EHS a článku 5 smernice Komisie 80/723/EHS na verejné podniky vo výrobnom sektore (Ú. v.
IATA, Passenger and freight forecasts 2007 to 2011, October 2007.
ES C 307, 13.11.1993, s.
This does not preclude foreseeing that future benefits may offset initial losses.
3, bod 11).
It forwarded these comments to Germany on 21 November 2011.
Uvedené oznámenie sa zaoberá odvetvím výroby, ale je uplatniteľné aj na ďalšie hospodárske odvetvia.
Germany was given the opportunity to respond to these comments within 1 month.
Pozri aj rozsudok vo veci T-16/96 Cityflyer, Zb.
The Commission requested further information on 15 May 2012, 20 July 2012 and 21 December 2012.
1998, s.
Germany responded by letters dated 28 June 2012, 10 September 2012 and 15 January 2013.
II-757, bod 51.
M2 — Engine testing structure: a new engine testing structure was constructed at Leipzig/Halle airport in 2007-08.
Dokument Medzinárodná konvergencia merania kapitálu a kapitálových noriem, ktorý zverejnil Bazilejský výbor pre bankový dohľad v júni 2006.
Leipzig/Halle airport operates 24 hours a day, therefore it has to offer facilities to conduct tests on aircraft engines at day and night.
Swapová úroková miera je ekvivalentom medzibankovej úrokovej miery (IBOR) s dlhšou splatnosťou.
Work for the reconstruction of multi-purpose hangar I and the fire station began in May 2009.
Na finančných trhoch sa používa ako referenčná sadzba pre stanovenie miery financovania.
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1470
Rozhodnutie Komisie (EÚ) 2015/1470
of 30 March 2015
z 30. marca 2015
on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Romania — Arbitral award Micula v Romania of 11 December 2013
o štátnej pomoci SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN), ktorú poskytlo Rumunsko – Rozhodcovský rozsudok z 11. decembra 2013 Micula/Rumunsko
(notified under document C(2015) 2112)
[oznámené pod číslom C(2015) 2112]
Having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above [2] and having regard to their comments,
po vyzvaní zainteresovaných strán, aby predložili svoje pripomienky v súlade s uvedenými ustanoveniami [2] a so zreteľom na tieto pripomienky,
By award of 11 December 2013 (‘the Award’), an arbitration tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) established under the auspices of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (‘ICSID’) in the case Micula a.o. v Romania [3] awarded compensation in favour of the five claimants (the brothers Viorel and Ioan Micula and the companies S.C. European Food SA, S.C. Starmill S.R.L., and S.C. Multipack, all owned by the Micula brothers; collectively, ‘the claimants’) against Romania in the amount of RON 376433229 (ca.
Na základe rozsudku z 11. decembra 2013 (ďalej len „rozsudok“) rozhodcovský súd (ďalej len „súd“) zriadený pod záštitou Medzinárodného centra pre riešenie investičných sporov (ďalej len „ICSID“) vo veci Micula a.o./Rumunsko [3] priznal náhradu škody piatim žalobcom (bratia Viorel Micula a Ioan Micula a spoločnosti S.C. European Food S.A., S.C. Starmill S.R.L. a S.C. Multipack, všetky vo vlastníctve bratov Miculovcov; spoločne „žalobcovia“) proti Rumunsku vo výške 376433229 RON (cca 82 miliónov EUR [4]) za to, že Rumunsko nezaistilo spravodlivé a rovnocenné zaobchádzanie s investíciami žalobcov, čo znamená, že Rumunsko porušilo článok 2 ods. 3 dohody medzi vládou Švédskeho kráľovstva a vládou Rumunska o podpore a vzájomnej ochrane investícií (ďalej len „bilaterálna investičná zmluva“) [5].
EUR 82 million [4]) for Romania’s failure to ensure a fair and equitable treatment of the claimants’ investments, which amounted to a violation by Romania of Article 2(3) of the Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Government of Romania on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments (‘the BIT’) [5].
Súd okrem toho rozhodol, že k tejto sume sa má pripisovať úrok, a to až do vykonania rozsudku zo strany Rumunska v plnom rozsahu.
In addition, the Tribunal decided that interest should accrue on that sum until Romania’s full implementation of the Award.
K 11. decembru 2013 tak celková suma, ktorú Rumunsko dlhovalo žalobcom, predstavovala 791882452 RON (cca.
By 11 December 2013, the total amount thus owed by Romania to the claimants amounted to RON 791882452 (ca.
178 miliónov EUR [6]).
On 20 February 2014, the Romanian authorities informed the Commission services that they had partially implemented the Award by offsetting a portion of the compensation awarded to the claimants by the Tribunal against taxes owed by one of the claimants, namely S.C.
Rumunsko žiadalo útvary Komisie o ďalšie objasnenie v súvislosti s možnosťou vyplatenia zostávajúcej sumy fyzickej osobe (bratia Viorel a Ioan Micula alebo akákoľvek iná fyzická osoba, ktorej môže byť nárok pridelený).