natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Status determination approach (clause 5.3.8)
Status determination approach (odsek 5.3.8)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the identifier of the status determination approach.
Toto pole je POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE identifikátor koncepcie určovania štatútu.
The following specific URI SHALL be used, as registered and described as follows:
POUŽÍVA sa tento URI tak, ako sa tu registruje a opisuje:
Description Services listed have their status determined by or on behalf of the Scheme Operator under an appropriate system for a referenced Member State that allows for ‘supervision’ (and, when applicable, for ‘voluntary accreditation’) of certification service providers who are established on its territory (or established in a third country in the case of ‘voluntary accreditation’) and issue qualified certificates to the public according to Art. 3,3 (respectively Art. 3,2 or Art. 7.1(a)) of the Directive 1999/93/EC, and, when applicable, that allows for the ‘supervision’/‘voluntary accreditation’ of certification service providers not issuing qualified certificates, according to a nationally defined and established recognised ‘approval scheme(s)’ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance of services from CSPs not issuing QCs with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and potentially extended by national provisions with regard to the provision of such certification services.
Opis Štatút služieb na zozname v príslušnom členskom štáte určuje prevádzkovateľ schémy alebo sa určuje v jeho mene v rámci vhodného systému, ktorý umožňuje „dohľad“ nad poskytovateľmi certifikačných služieb (a prípadne ich „dobrovoľnú akreditáciu“), ktorí majú sídlo na jeho území (alebo v tretej krajine v prípade „dobrovoľnej akreditácie)“ a vydávajú kvalifikované certifikáty pre verejnosť v súlade s článkom 3 ods. 3 [prípadne článkom 3 ods. 2 alebo článkom 7 ods. 1 písm. a)] smernice 1999/93/ES, a v prípade potreby umožňuje „dohľad“ nad poskytovateľmi certifikačných služieb, ktorí nevydávajú kvalifikované certifikáty/ich „dobrovoľnú akreditáciu“ podľa vnútroštátne vymedzených a zriadených „uznaných schém schvaľovania CSP“ vnútroštátne implementovaných na účely dohľadu nad tým, či služby, ktoré CSP nevydávajúce QC poskytujú, spĺňajú ustanovenia v smernici 1999/93/ES potenciálne rozšírené o vnútroštátne ustanovenia o poskytovaní takýchto certifikačných služieb.
Scheme type/community/rules (clause 5.3.9)
Scheme type/community/rules (odsek 5.3.9)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL contain at least the following registered URIs:
Toto pole je POVINNÉ a OBSAHUJE minimálne tieto registrované URI:
A URI common to all Member States' Trusted Lists pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to all TLs:
URI spoločný pre všetky zoznamy dôveryhodných poskytovateľov členských štátov, ktorý odkazuje na opisný text, ktorý JE uplatniteľný na všetky TL
By which participation is denoted of the Member State’s scheme (identified via the TSL type (clause 5.3,3) and Scheme name (clause 5.3.6)) in a scheme of schemes (i.e. a TSL listing pointers to all Member States publishing and maintaining a TL in the form of a TSL);
ktorým sa označuje účasť schémy členského štátu (identifikovanej pomocou „TSL type“ [odsek 5.3.3) and „Scheme name“ (odsek 5.3.6)] na schéme schém (teda TSL so zoznamom ukazovateľov na všetky členské štáty, ktoré uverejňujú a vedú TL vo forme TSL),
Where users can obtain policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed and from which the type of the TSL (see clause 5.3.3) can be determined;
kde používatelia majú prístup k politikám/pravidlám, na základe ktorých sa služby na zozname POSUDZUJÚ a dá sa určiť typ TSL (pozri odsek 5.3.3),
Where users can obtain description about how to use and interpret the content of the TSL implementation of the Trusted List.
kde používatelia majú prístup k opisu ako využívať a vykladať obsah TSL implementácie zoznamu dôveryhodných poskytovateľov.
These usage rules SHALL be common to all Member States' Trusted Lists whatever the type of listed service and whatever the supervision/accreditation system(s) is (are).
Tieto pravidlá používania SÚ spoločné pre všetky zoznamy dôveryhodných poskytovateľov členských štátov, bez ohľadu na typ služby na zozname a systémy dohľadu/akreditácie.
Descriptive text:
Opisný text:
Each Member State must create a “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
Each Member State must create a ‚Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers‘ providing information about the supervision/accreditation status of certification services from Certification Service Providers (CSPs) who are supervised/accredited by the relevant Member State for compliance with the relevant provisions of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13. decembra 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
The applicable “supervision” system (respectively “voluntary accreditation” system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11).
The applicable ‚supervision‘ system (respectively ‚voluntary accreditation‘ system) is defined and must meet the relevant requirements of Directive 1999/93/EC, in particular those laid down in Art. 3,3, Art. 8,1, Art. 11 (respectively, Art.2.13, Art. 3,2, Art 7.1(a), Art. 8,1, Art. 11).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a “voluntary accreditation” system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined “recognised approval scheme” implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
CSPs not issuing QCs but providing ancillary services, may fall under a ‚voluntary accreditation‘ system (as defined in and in compliance with Directive 1999/93/EC) and/or under a nationally defined ‚recognised approval scheme‘ implemented on a national basis for the supervision of compliance with the provisions laid down in Directive 1999/93/EC and possibly with national provisions with regard to the provision of certification services (in the sense of Art. 2,11 of the Directive).
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific “qualification” on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a “qualification” is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
Some of the physical or binary (logical) objects generated or issued as a result of the provision of a certification service may be entitled to receive a specific ‚qualification‘ on the basis of their compliance with the provisions and requirements laid down at national level but the meaning of such a ‚qualification‘ is likely to be limited solely to the national level.
indicates that from the “Service digital identifier” (Sdi) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the “Sdi” identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
indicates that from the ‚Service digital identifier‘ (Sdi) identified CA (similarly within the CA hierarchy starting from the ‚Sdi‘ identified RootCA) from the corresponding CSP (see associated TSP information fields), all issued end-entity certificates are Qualified Certificates (QCs) provided that it is claimed as such in the certificate through the use of appropriate ETSI TS 101 862 defined QcStatements (i.e. QcC, QcSSCD) and/or ETSI TS 101 456 defined QCP(+) OIDs (and this is guaranteed by the issuing CSP and ensured by the Member State Supervisory/Accreditation Body)
Note: if no “Sie”“Qualification” information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not “further identified” through a related Sie entry, then the “machine-processable” information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
Note: if no ‚Sie‘‚Qualification‘ information is present or if an end-entity certificate that is claimed to be a QC is not ‚further identified‘ through a related Sie entry, then the ‚machine-processable‘ information to be found in the QC is supervised/accredited to be accurate.
and IF“Sie”“Qualification” information is present, then in addition to the above default usage interpretation rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of this Sie Qualification entry, which is constructed on the principle of a sequence of “filters” further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing some additional information regarding SSCD support and/or “Legal person as subject” (e.g. those certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific “Key usage” pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
and IF‚Sie‘‚Qualification‘ information is present, then in addition to the above default usage interpretation rule, those certificates that are identified through the use of this Sie Qualification entry, which is constructed on the principle of a sequence of ‚filters‘ further identifying a set of certificates, must be considered according to the associated qualifiers providing some additional information regarding SSCD support and/or ‚Legal person as subject‘ (e.g. those certificates containing a specific OID in the Certificate Policy extension, and/or having a specific ‚Key usage‘ pattern, and/or filtered through the use of a specific value to appear in one specific certificate field or extension, etc.).
Those qualifiers are part of the following set of “qualifiers” used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding QC content, and that are used respectively:
Those qualifiers are part of the following set of ‚qualifiers‘ used to compensate for the lack of information in the corresponding QC content, and that are used respectively:
“QCWithSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC supported by an SSCD”, or
‚QCWithSSCD‘ qualifier value meaning ‚QC supported by an SSCD‘, or
“QCNoSSCD” qualifier value meaning “QC not supported by an SSCD”, or
‚QCNoSSCD‘ qualifier value meaning ‚QC not supported by an SSCD‘, or
“QCSSCDStatusAsInCert” qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the “Sdi”-“Sie” provided information in this CA/QC entry;
‚QCSSCDStatusAsInCert‘ qualifier value meaning that the SSCD support information is ensured to be contained in any QC under the ‚Sdi‘-‚Sie‘ provided information in this CA/QC entry;
“QCForLegalPerson” qualifier value meaning “Certificate issued to a Legal Person”
‚QCForLegalPerson‘ qualifier value meaning ‚Certificate issued to a Legal Person‘
The general interpretation rule for any other “Sti” type entry is that the listed service named according to the “Sn” field value and uniquely identified by the “Sdi” field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the “Scs” field value as from the date indicated in the “Current status starting date and time”.
The general interpretation rule for any other ‚Sti‘ type entry is that the listed service named according to the ‚Sn‘ field value and uniquely identified by the ‚Sdi‘ field value has a current supervision/accreditation status according to the ‚Scs‘ field value as from the date indicated in the ‚Current status starting date and time‘.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. “Service information extensions” field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present “Scheme type/community/rules” field.
Specific interpretation rules for any additional information with regard to a listed service (e.g. ‚Service information extensions‘ field) may be found, when applicable, in the Member State specific URI as part of the present ‚Scheme type/community/rules‘ field.
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the “Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers” in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted Lists.’
Please refer to the Technical specifications for a Common Template for the ‚Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers‘ in the Annex of Commission Decision 2009/767/EC for further details on the fields, description and meaning for the TSL implementation of the Member States' Trusted Lists.“
A URI specific to each Member State’s Trusted List pointing towards a descriptive text that SHALL be applicable to this Member State TL:
Špecifický URI pre zoznam dôveryhodných poskytovateľov každého členského štátu, ktorý je odkazom na opisný text, ktorý JE uplatniteľný na TL tohto členského štátu:
where CC = the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 Country Code used in the ‘Scheme territory’ field (clause 5.3.10)
pričom „CC“ = kód krajiny podľa ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 použitý v poli „Scheme territory“ (odsek 5.3.10):
Where users can obtain the referenced Member State’s specific policy/rules against which services included in the list SHALL be assessed in compliance with the Member State’s appropriate supervision system and voluntary accreditation schemes.
kde používatelia majú prístup k osobitným politikám/pravidlám dotknutého členského štátu, podľa ktorých sa služby na zozname POSUDZUJÚ v súlade s vhodným systémom dohľadu a schémami dobrovoľnej akreditácie členského štátu,
Where users can obtain a referenced Member State’s specific description about how to use and interpret the content of the TSL implementation of the Trusted List with regard to the certification services not related to the issuing of QCs.
kde používatelia majú prístup k osobitnému opisu členského štátu ako používať a vykladať obsah TSL implementácie zoznamu dôveryhodných poskytovateľov vzhľadom na certifikačné služby, ktoré nesúvisia s vydávaním QC.
This may be used to indicate a potential granularity in the national supervision/accreditation systems related to CSPs not issuing QCs and how the ‘Scheme service definition URI’ (clause 5.5.6) and the ‘Service information extension’ field are used for this purpose.
Tento opis sa môže použiť na znázornenie možnej nesúrodosti vnútroštátnych systémov dohľadu/akreditácie súvisiacich s CSP, ktorí nevydávajú QC, a toho, ako sa na tento účel používajú polia „Scheme service definition URI“ (odsek 5.5.6) a „Service information extension“.
Member States MAY define additional URIs from the above Member State specific URI (i.e. URIs defined from this hierarchical specific URI).
Členské štáty MÔŽU vymedziť dodatočné URI k uvedenému URI špecifickému pre daný členský štát (teda URI vymedzené na základe tohto hierarchického špecifického URI).
Scheme territory (clause 5.3.10)
Scheme territory (odsek 5.3.10)
In the context of the present specifications, this field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the country in which the scheme is established (ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 country code).
V súvislosti s týmito špecifikáciami je toto pole POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE krajinu, v ktorej je schéma zriadená (kód krajiny podľa ISO 3166-1 alpha-2).
TSL policy/legal notice (clause 5.3.11)
TSL policy/legal notice (odsek 5.3.11)
In the context of the present specifications, this field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the scheme’s policy or provide a notice concerning the legal status of the scheme or legal requirements met by the scheme for the jurisdiction in which the scheme is established and/or any constraints and conditions under which the TL is maintained and published.
V súvislosti s týmito špecifikáciami je toto pole POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE politiku schémy alebo sa v ňom uvádza právny štatút schémy alebo právne požiadavky, ktoré schéma spĺňa, na území, pod ktorého právomoc spadá, a/alebo obmedzenia a podmienky, za ktorých sa TL vedie a uverejňuje.
This SHALL be a multilingual character string (plain text) made of two parts:
JE to viacjazyčný reťazec znakov (vo formáte „plain text“) pozostávajúci z dvoch častí:
A first mandatory part, common to all Member States' TLs (with EN as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages), indicating that the applicable legal framework is Directive 1999/93/EC and its corresponding implementation in the laws of the Member State indicated in the ‘Scheme Territory’ field.
Prvej, povinnej časti, spoločnej pre TL všetkých členských štátov (v EN ako povinnom jazyku a prípadne v jednom alebo viacerých národných jazykoch), v ktorom sa uvádza, že platným právnym rámcom je smernica 1999/93/ES a jej zodpovedajúca implementácia v právnych predpisoch členských štátoch sa uvedie v poli „Scheme Territory“.
English version of the common text:
Anglická verzia spoločného znenia:
‘The applicable legal framework for the present TSL implementation of the Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers for [name of the relevant Member State] is the Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures and its implementation in [name of the relevant Member State] laws.’
„The applicable legal framework for the present TSL implementation of the Trusted List of supervised/accredited Certification Service Providers for [name of the relevant Member State] is the Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13. decembra 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures and its implementation in [name of the relevant Member State] laws.“
Text in a Member State’s national language(s): [official translation(s) of the above English text].
Znenie v národnom jazyku (národných jazykoch) členského štátu: [úradný preklad (preklady) uvedeného anglického znenia].
A second optional part, specific to each TL (with EN as the mandatory language, and with potentially one or more national languages), indicating references to specific applicable national legal frameworks (e.g. in particular when related to national supervision/accreditation schemes for CSPs not issuing QCs).
Druhej, dobrovoľnej časti, špecifickej pre každý TL (v EN ako povinnom jazyku a prípadne v jednom alebo viacerých národných jazykoch) s odkazmi na osobitné uplatniteľné vnútroštátne právne rámce (napr. predovšetkým vtedy, ak sa týkajú vnútroštátnych schém dohľadu/akreditácie CSP, ktorí nevydávajú QC).
Historical information period (clause 5.3.12)
Historical information period (odsek 5.3.12)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the duration (integer) over which historical information in the TSL is provided.
Toto pole je POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE dobu (celým číslom), počas ktorej sa v TSL poskytujú historické informácie.
This integer value is to be provided in number of days and in the context of the present specifications it SHALL be greater or equal to 3653 (i.e. meaning that the TSL implementation of Member States' TL MUST contain historical information for a minimum of ten years).
Táto hodnota vyjadrená pomocou celého čísla označuje počet dní a v súvislosti s týmito špecifikáciami JE väčšia alebo SA ROVNÁ 3653 (čo znamená, že TSL implementácia TL členských štátov MUSÍ obsahovať historické informácie za minimálne desať rokov).
Greater values should take due account of the legal requirements for data retention in the Member State indicated in the ‘Scheme Territory’ (clause 5.3.10).
Pri väčších hodnotách by sa náležitým spôsobom mali zohľadniť právne požiadavky na uchovávanie údajov v členskom štáte uvedenom v „Scheme Territory“ (odsek 5.3.10)
Pointers to other TSLs (clause 5.3.13)
Pointers to other TSLs (odsek 5.3.13)
In the context of the present specifications, this field is REQUIRED and SHALL include, when this is available, the pointer to an ETSI TS 102 231 compliant form of the EC compiled list of links (pointers) towards all TSL implementations of Trusted Lists from the Member States.
V súvislosti s týmito špecifikáciami je toto pole POVINNÉ a ZAHŔŇA ukazovateľa, ak je taký k dispozícii, na zoznam liniek (ukazovateľov) na všetky TSL implementácie zoznamov dôveryhodných poskytovateľov členských štátov, ktorý zostavila EK a je v podobe zodpovedajúcej ETSI TS 102 231.
Specifications from ETSI TS 102 231, clause 5.3.13 shall apply while mandating the use of the optional digital identity, representing the issuer of the TSL pointed to, formatted as specified in clause 5.5.3.
Špecifikácie ETSI TS 102 231, odsek 5.3.13 sa uplatňujú, pričom je povinné použitie voliteľnej digitálnej totožnosti, ktorá predstavuje vydavateľa TSL, na ktorého sa odkazuje, vo formáte podľa odseku 5.5.3.
Note: While waiting for the ETSI TS 102 231 compliant implementation of the EC compiled list of links towards Members State’s TSL implementation of their TLs, this field SHALL NOT be used.
Poznámka: Toto pole sa NEPOUŽÍVA, pokiaľ sa čaká na implementáciu zoznamu liniek k TSL implementácii TL jednotlivých členských štátov, ktorý zostavila EK, podľa ETSI TS 102 231.
List issue date and time (clause 5.3.14)
List issue date and time (odsek 5.3.14)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the date and time (UTC expressed as Zulu) on which the TSL was issued using Date-time value as specified in ETSI TS 102 231, clause 5.1.4.
Toto pole je POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE dátum a čas (UTC vyjadrený ako Zulu), keď sa TSL vydal pomocou hodnoty dátum-čas, ako je špecifikované v ETSI TS 102 231 odsek 51.4.
Next update (clause 5.3.15)
Next update (odsek 5.3.15)
This field is REQUIRED and SHALL specify the latest date and time (UTC expressed as Zulu) by which the next TSL will be issued or be null to indicate a closed TSL (using Date-time value as specified in ETSI TS 102 231, clause 5.1.4).
Toto pole je POVINNÉ a ŠPECIFIKUJE najneskorší dátum a čas (UTC vyjadrený ako Zulu), keď sa vydá nasledujúci TSL alebo JE prázdne, čo znamená, že TSL sa uzatvoril (pomocou hodnoty dátum-čas, ako je špecifikované v ETSI TS 102 231, odsek 5.1.4).
In the event of no interim status changes to any TSP or service covered by the scheme, the TSL MUST be re-issued by the time of expiration of the last TSL issued.
Ak sa pri TSP alebo akejkoľvek službe patriacej do schémy priebežne štatút nezmení, MUSÍ sa po uplynutí platnosti posledne vydaného TSL vydať nový TSL.
In the context of the present specifications, the difference between the ‘Next update’ date and time and the ‘List issue date and time’ SHALL NOT exceed six (6) months.
V súvislosti s týmito špecifikáciami rozdiel medzi dátumom a časom „Next update“ a „List issue date and time“ NEPRESAHUJE šesť (6) mesiacov.
Distribution points (clause 5.3.16)
Distribution points (odsek 5.3.16)
This field is OPTIONAL.
Toto pole je VOLITEĽNÉ.
If used, it SHALL specify locations where the current TSL implementation of the TL is published and where updates to the current TSL can be found.
Ak sa použije, ŠPECIFIKUJE lokality, kde je uverejnená aktuálna TSL implementácia TL a kde možno nájsť aktualizácie platnej TSL.
If multiple distribution points are specified, they all MUST provide identical copies of the current TSL or its updated version.
Ak sú špecifikované viaceré distribučné miesta, všetky MUSIA poskytovať identické kópie platného TSL alebo jeho aktualizovanej verzie.