natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This list of 25 activities has been adopted from the list included in Annex 3 to the Commission’s Communication on Financing Natura 2000 (COM(2004)431 final), which was in turn derived from the list of categories determined by the Article 8 Working Group and included in their Final Report on Financing Natura 20003.
Aceasta lista de 25 de activitati a fost adoptata pe baza listei incluse in Anexa 3 a Comunicarii Comisiei cu privire la nantarea retelei Natura 2000, care la randul ei deriva din lista categoriilor stabilite de Grupul de Lucru pentru Articolul 8 si a fost inclusa in Raportul nal privind nantarea retelei Natura 20003.
•Articlenumber•Article’ssubject(title)•Possibletargetgroups*•Possiblesitetypes*•Arearestrictionsoneligibility (eg area restrictions under the Structural Funds) •Otherpossiblerestrictions/notes•Possibleexamplesofusingthe Article in managing Nature 2000 sites
• Numarul articolului• Subiectul (titlul) articolului • Posibile grupuri tinta*• Posibile tipuri de situri*• Restrictii de eligibilitate in selectia zonelor (ex. restrictii de zona in cadrul Fondurilor Structurale) • Alte posibile restrictii/note • Posibile exemple de utilizare a Articolului in gospodarirea siturilor Natura 2000
The working group recognised that the denition of type and scope of activities is not straightforward, and that Member States may take quite dierent approaches to categorisation and description of these.
Grupul de lucru a recunoscut ca nu exista o denitie clara a tipului si domeniului de aplicare ale activitatilor si ca Statele Membre pot avea abordari diferite privind impartirea si descrierea acestora.
This point is also recognised by the authors of this Handbook.
Acest lucru este recunoscut si de autorii acestui manual.
If Member State authorities are interested in obtaining Community co-funding for a management activity that does not appear to be covered in the list below, they are advised to contact staff in the European Commission’s DG-Environment who will be able to assist with questions of interpretation.
Daca autoritatile din Statele Membre sunt interesate sa obtina o conan-tare din partea Comunitatii pentru o activitate de management ce nu apare in lista de mai jos, se recomanda sa ia legatura cu DG – Mediu a Comisiei Europene, care poate oferi sprijin pe probleme de interpretare.
Some changes/additions have been made to the list, as suggested by the Accompanying Working Group for this project.
Listei i-au fost aduse modicari/adaugiri, conform sugestiei Grupului de Lucru pentru acest proiect.
The European Funds that have been analysed to produce this Handbook each operate in accordance with the systems and requirements set out in their specic Regulations.
Fiecare din Fondurile Europene analizate pentru realizarea acestui manual opereaza in conformitate cu sistemele si prevederile stabilite in reglementarile specice.
The analysis of opportunities that is presented in the tables that follow in Section 5 is based on the text of the EU Regulations (draft, or final where available) for each individual Fund.
Analiza posibilitatilor, prezentata in tabelele din Sectiunea 5, se bazeaza pe textul Reglementarilor UE (proiect sau varianta finala, acolo unde exista) pentru ecare fond in parte.
For the Funds that operate according to a programming process, it is important to note that the availability of funds for a particular activity ‘on the ground’ will depend on the contents of several strategic and operational documents, including:
Pentru fondurile ce opereaza in conformitate cu un proces de programare este important de retinut ca disponibilitatea fondurilor pentru o anumita activitate„in teren” depinde de continutul mai multor documente strategice si operationale, printre care:
Users of the Handbook should note that the Articles listed in the tables do not lead to identical opportunities for the activity in question in all Member States.
Cei ce utilizeaza prezentul manual trebuie sa tina seama de faptul ca articolele enumerate in tabele nu vor conduce la posibilitati identice in toate Statele Membre pentru o anumita activitate.
The funding possibilities are always subject to the broader context and objectives of the Regulation (eg regional development) and in some cases the Article itself can be limited to a certain context (eg risk prevention, renewable energies).
Posibilitatile de finantare sunt intotdeauna supuse unui context mai larg si obiectivelor Regulamentelor (de ex. dezvoltarea regionala) si in unele situatii chiar articolul respectiv poate limitat intr-un anumit context (ex. prevenirea riscurilor, energii regenerabile).
The management of Natura 2000 sites is likely to consist of a set of measures that, depending on the site in question, may be funded through dierent European Funds, and dierent Articles.
Gospodarirea siturilor Natura 2000 poate consta dintr-o serie de masuri care, in functie de sit, pot nantate prin diferite Fonduri Europene si prin articole diferite.
In fact, managers will need strong skills in assessing funds and programmes in order to match funding needs for Natura 2000 with all existing EU and non-EU funding resources.
Adevarul este ca managerii trebuie sa e foarte priceputi in evaluarea fondurilor si programelor pentru a pune de acord necesitatile de finantare pentru Natura 2000 cu toate resursele financiare UE si non UE.
At the end of the tables are sheets describing each of the main Community funds.
La finalul tabelelor, exista se ce cuprind descrierea -ecaruia dintre principalele fonduri comunitare.
These sheets give a brief description of the aims of the fund, the programming process, and list the Articles that are relevant to Natura 2000 (those included in the tables).
Aceste se contin o scurta descriere a scopurilor fondului respectiv, procesul de programare si lista articolelor importante pentru Natura 2000 (cele incluse in tabele).
• Text in the Regulation, as published in the Ocial Journal.•Thecontentsof‘strategic’programmesandplans(eg national strategic plans for EFF, national strategy plans for EAFRD, national strategic reference frameworks for the ERDF, ESF and the Cohesion Fund).
NB: prezentul manual nu intentioneaza sa inlocuiasca cercetarea locala privind posibilitatile de finantare – multe dintre Statele Membre deja deruleaza programe de finantare independente de fondurile comunitare, dar aplicabile siturilor Natura 2000.
NB: this Handbook is not intended to be a replacement for carrying out local research on funding opportunities – many Member States operate funding programmes that are independent of Community funds, but applicable to Natura 2000 sites.
• Textul Regulamentului, asa cum a fost publicat in Jurnalul Ocial. • Continutul programelor si planurilor„strategice” (ex. planuri nationale strategice pentru FEP, planuri nationale de strategie pentru FEADR, cadru national strategic de referinta pentru FEDR, FSE si Fondul de Coeziune).
This Handbook contains information only on the main Community funds.
Acestea sunt elaborate de Statele Membre.• Continutul programelor „operationale” nationale sau regionale (ex programe de dezvoltare rurala in cadrul FEADR, programe nationale operationale in cadrul FEP, programe operationale in cadrul Fondurilor Structurale si Fondului de Coeziune, actiuni prioritare stabilite anual la nivel national in cadrul LIFE+).
These ‘levels’ of programming detail allow each Member State and/or region to identify the issues that are of most concern locally, and prioritise funds in order to address these issues.
Gradul diferentiat de detaliere a acestor programe permite fiecarui Stat Membru si/sau ecarei regiuni sa identice aspectele cele mai importante pe plan local si sa stabilieasca prioritatile financiare in vederea solutionarii problemelor.
The amount of detail included at each level varies for each Fund.
Volumul detaliilor inclus la ecare nivel variaza in functie de ecare fond.
For example, the rural development programmes to be developed under EAFRD will contain very detailed descriptions of individual measures that can be funded.
De exemplu, programele de dezvoltare rurala ce vor elaborate conform FEADR trebuie sa cuprinda descrierea in amanunt a -ecarei masuri in parte ce poate finantata.
By contrast, the plans and programmes required under ERDF, ESF and the Cohesion Fund are more strategic and will not contain detailed descriptions of measures.
In schimb planurile si programele cerute in cadrul FEDR, FSE si al Fondului de Coeziune sunt mai strategice si nu necesita descrierea detaliata a masurilor.
At the national and regional level, the Commission does not have primary responsibility for determining the contents of the programmes, but it may have a role in checking that programmes are in line with Community priorities as set out in the Regulations or in Strategic Guidelines.
La nivel national si regional, Comisia nu are responsabilitatea primara de a stabili continutul programelor, dar ii poate reveni rolul de a verica in ce masura programele corespund prioritatilor europene formulate prin Regulamentele sau Liniile Directoare Strategice.
In the past, Ministries of Finance, Environment, Agriculture and Development (amongst others) have been involved in drafting programmes for use of Community Funds.
In trecut, pe langa alte institutii, Ministerele de Finante, Mediu, Agricultura si Dezvoltare erau implicate in elaborarea programelor pentru utilizarea Fondurilor comunitare.
DESCRIPTIONS OF FUNDS
DESCRIEREA FONDURILOR
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
Fondul European pentru Agricultura si Dezvoltare Rurala (FEADR)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). OJ L 277/2 21.10.2005.
Regulamentul Consiliului (EC) Nr. 1698/2005 din 20 Septembrie 2005 referitor la sprijinirea dezvoltarii rurale de catre Fondul European de Agricultura pentru Dezvoltare Rurala (FEADR). OJ L 277/2 21.10.2005.
Also see: Community Strategic Guidelines for Rural Development. OJ L.55/20 25.02.2006.
A se vedea de asemenea: Liniile directoare strategice comunitare pentru Dezvoltarea Rurala. OJ L.55/20 25.02.2006.
The implementing Regulations for EAFRD provide more details on how the measures in Regulation No 1698/2005 should be applied by Member States.
Reglementarile privind implementarea FEADR furnizeaza mai multe detalii despre modul in care Statele Membre urmeaza sa aplice masurile cuprinse in Regulamentul Nr 1698/2005.
The objectives of the EAFRD are set out in Article 4.
Obiectivele FEADR sunt stabilite in Articolul 4.
‘Support for rural development shall contribute to achieving the following objectives:
„Sprijini-rea dezvoltarii rurale trebuie sa contribuie la realizarea urmatoarelor obiective:
EAFRD is structured according to four ‘axes’ of rural development, and the minimum expenditure on each axis varies as follows:
FEADR este structurat conform celor patru „axe” de dezvoltare rurala si cheltuielile minime pentru ecare axa variaza dupa cum urmeaza:
•improvingthecompetitivenessofagricul-ture and forestry by supporting restructuring, development and innovation;•improvingtheenvironmentandthecoun-tryside by supporting land management;•improvingthequalityoflifeinruralareasanden-couraging diversication of economic activity.’
• imbunatatirea competitivitatii agriculturii si silviculturii prin sprijinirea restructurarii, dezvoltarii si inovarii;• imbunatatirea mediului si a zonelor rurale prin sprijinirea gospodaririi terenului;• imbunatatirea calitatii vietii in zonele rurale si incurajarea diversicarii activitatiilor economice.”
The EAFRD will operate according to a programming approach for the 2007–13 funding period.
FEADR se va desfasura conform prevederilor de programare pentru perioada de finantare 2007–13.
Member State authorities are required to develop National Strategy Plans (NSPs) and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs), which will translate the Community priorities contained in the Regulation and Strategic Guidelines into the national/regional context.
Autoritatile din Statele Membre trebuie sa elaboreze Planuri Nationale Strategice (PNS) si Programe Nationale de Dezvoltare Rurala (PNDR), care sa transpuna prioritatile Comunitatii cuprinse in Ghidul de Reglementari si Strategie in contextul national / regional.
In many cases, there will be national or regional priorities for specic problems.
In numeroase situatii vor exista prioritati nationale si regionale pentru anumite probleme.
Member States have flexibility to split expenditure across the four axes so long as the minimum thresholds are respected.
Statele Membre au posibilitatea de a decide asupra e-xibilitatii alocarii fondurilor pentru cele patru axe, cu respectarea procentelor minime.
Axis 4 on Leader is developed as a crosscutting approach that can deliver integrated rural development by targeting aspects in each of or all of the other three axes (see box).
Axa 4, referitoare la Programul Leader, se dezvolta ca o abordare incrucisata ce poate asigura o dezvoltare rurala integrata prin urmarirea aspectelor cuprinse in ecare din celelalate trei axe (vezi tabel).
It should be noted that there is likely to be some competition for funding between measures nationally, due to the size of the overall EU budget for 2007–13, and measures supporting Natura will have to be keenly promoted by stakeholders ahead of other competing measures.
Trebuie mentionat ca este posibil sa apara o competitie pentru finantarile la nivel national, ca urmare a dimensiunii bugetului total UE pentru 2007–13, fiind necesar asadar ca masurile pentru spriinirea retelei Natura 2000 sa e promovate cu abilitate de catre grupurile de interese, inaintea altor masuri ce vor concura pentru aceleasi finantari.
The need for dynamic thinking is therefore paramount.
Necesitatea unei gandirii dinamice are prin urmare o importanta majora.
Stakeholders and national administrations alike should seek to use the options available within EAFRD to deliver integrated rural development.
Grupurile de interese, la fel ca si administratorii nationali, trebuie sa descopere si utilizeze toate posibilitatile existente in cadrul FEADR in vederea unei dezvoltari rurale integrate.
This means selecting groups of measures that lead to wins not only for the environment and Natura, but also for local economy and society.
Aceasta inseamna selectarea si gruparea demasuri care sa determine succesul nu numai pentru mediu si Natura 2000, ci si pentru economia locala si societate.
The EAFRD Regulation sets out the required process for developing and adopting NSPs and RDPs, and their required contents/structure (see Titles II and III).
Regulamentul FEADR stabileste procesul de elaborare si adoptare a Planurilor Nationale Strategice (PNS) si a Programelor Nationale de Dezvoltare Rurala (PNDR), cat si continutul/structura acestora. (a se vedea Titlurile II si III).
Activities that are not included in the Rural Development programmes cannot be funded under the EAFRD.
Activitatile care nu sunt incluse in programele de dezvoltare rurala nu pot nantate prin FEADR.
It is therefore important that the needs and objectives related to management of Natura 2000 sites are integrated into the National Strategy Plans and that subsequently the related actions/measures are included in the RDPs, if authorities intend to use EAFRD for co--nancing of such activities.
Asadar este important ca necesitatile si obiectivele legate de gospodarirea siturilor Natura 2000 sa e integrate in Planurile Nationale Strategice, dupa care actiunile/masurile aferente sa e incluse in Programele Nationale de Dezvoltare Rurala, daca autoritatile au intentia de a utiliza FEADR in scopul conantarii acestor activitati.
NB: The above table oers approximate dates only, given that the only concrete date is the 1 January 2007 for NSPs and RDPs to begin.
NB: tabelul de mai sus prezinta numai date aproximative, dat indfica singura data concreta este 1 ianuarie 2007 ca data stabilita pentru inceperea PNS si PNDR.
Further delay in finalising the Financial Perspectives could lead to Member States postponing the finalisation of NSPs and RDPs until they are certain of a clear budgetary framework under which their Programmes can operate.
In cazul in care se intarzie cu naliza-rea Perspectivelor Financiare este posibila amanarea finalizarii PNS si PNDR pana in momentul in care exista un cadru bugetar clar in care sa se deruleze programele.
TABLE 6: LIST OF KEY ARTICLES IN THE EAFRD
TABEL 6: LISTA ARTICOLELOR
REGULATION IN RELATION TO NATURA 2000
REFERITOARE LA NATURA 20006
Article 20(a)(i) vocational training and information actions, including diusion of scientic knowledge and innovative practise, for persons engaged in the agricultural, food and forestry sectors improving the economic value of Forests.
Actiuni de pregatire profesionala si informare, cu transmiterea cunostintelor stiintice si a practicilor inovatoare pentru persoanele angajate in sectoarele agricol, alimentar si silvic.
20(b)(ii) 20(b)(vi) restoring agricultural production potential damaged by natural disasters and introducing appropriate prevention actions
Refacerea potentialului productiei agricole afectat de dezastre naturale si introducerea masurilor corespunzatoare de prevenire
Natura 2000 payments and payments linked to Directive 2000/60/EC
Plati pentru Natura 2000 si plati referitoare la Directiva 2000/60/EC;
Leader constitutes the fourth Axis of the new EAFRD and will be used to contribute to the priorities of the first three Axes (ie improving competitiveness, the environment and countryside, and the quality of rural life and diversifying the rural economy) as well as encouraging bottom-up rural development and improved governance.
Leader reprezinta a patra axa a noului FEADR al carei rol este de a contribui la prioritatile primelor trei axe (respectiv imbunatatirea competitivitatii, a mediului si a zonelor rurale, calitatea vietii rurale si diversicarea economiei rurale) ca si de a incuraja stabilizarea dezvoltarii rurale si a imbunatatirii controlului.
Some 5% of total EAFRD funds will be allocated to the Leader axis (2.5% for the new Member States).
Aproximativ 5% din totalul fondurilor FEADR vor alocate axei LEADER.(2.5% pentru noile State Membre).
Leader local strategies are areabased to make the best use of existing resources and capitalise on a common identity.
Strategiile locale pentru Leader sunt strategii la nivel local, concepute pentru o utilizare optima a resurselor existente si capitalizarea unei identitati comune.
Public-private partnerships, called local action groups (LAGs), identify development needs within their own rural communities.
Parteneriatele public-private, numite grupuri de actiune locala (GAL), identica necesitatile locale in cadrul propriei comunitati rurale.
These are then set out in a development plan.
Apoi acestea sunt introduse in-tr-un plan de dezvoltare.
Leader funding assists these local action groups to encourage and support the development of small-scale, innovative projects that meet local development needs in a sustainable way.
Fondurile Leader sprijina aceste grupuri de actiune locala pentru incurajarea si sprijinirea dezvoltarii proiectelor la scara mica, inovatoare, care sa raspunda necesitatilor locale de dezvoltare intr-un mod durabil.
Leader promotes cooperation between LAGs in dierent European countries to jointly develop projects and build networks at regional, national and European Union level.
Fondurile Leader promoveaza colaborarea intre grupurile de actiune locala din diferite tari europene in vederea elaborarii unor proiecte comune si a inintarii unor retele la nivel regional, national si european.
In past programming periods, many Leader projects have had clear benets for Natura 2000.
In perioadele anterioare numeroase proiecte Leader sau dovedit a benece pentru Natura 2000.
The key benet of Leader is not in a large funding source for single Natura 2000 measures, but rather in the approach, which promotes cooperation of local actors and the development of integrated projects.
Avantajul cheie al programului Leader consta nu in dimensiunea sursei de finantare pentru masurile privitoare la Natura 2000, ci mai curand in modul de abordare, care promoveaza colaborarea intre factorii locali si elaborarea de proiecte integrate.
Therefore it is very suitable for areas with strategies that combine nature conservation and land use in a sustainable way such as enhancing the value of Natura 2000 sites eg by ecotourism or marketing of sustainable regional products.
Prin urmare, este foarte potrivit pentru zone cu strategii in care conservarea naturii si utilizarea terenului se combina in mod durabil, cum ar imbunatatirea valorii siturilor Natura 2000 prin ecoturism sau prin marketingul produselor locale durabile.
Examples of past Leader projects and programmes, and more information is available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rur/leaderplus/index_en.htm agri-environment payments
Exemple de proiecte si programe Leader si informatii suplimentare la: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rur/leaderplus/index_en.htm
36(a)(iv) 36(a)(vi) support for non-productive investments [Agricultural land.]
Prima inintare a sistemelor agro-silvice pe teren agricol
Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector.
Imbunatatirea competitivitatii sectorului agricol si forestier.
Improving the environment and the countryside.
Imbunatatirea mediului si a spatiului rural
The quality of life in rural areas and diversica-tion of the rural economy.
Calitatea vietii in zonele rurale si diversicarea economiei rurale.
36(b)(vii) 52(a)(i) 52(a)(iii) 52(b)(iii) 52(c) a training and information measure for economic actors operating in the fields covered by axis 3
Masuri de instruire si informare a factorilor economici din domeniile acoperite de axa 3
Date February 2006 a skills-acquisition and animation measure with a view to preparing and implementing a local development strategy
Masuri de specializare si animare/mobilizare in vederea pregatirii si implementarii strategiei de dezvoltare locala
January–March 2006April–June 2006
Data Februarie 2006
Implementing Regulations to be adopted by Commission
Consultarea Statelor Membre privind Planurile Nationale Strategice
Member States submit NSPs
Ianuarie – Martie 2006Aprilie–Iunie 2006
March–May 2006 i.e. max 3 months after adoption of Community Strategic Guidelines, but pending on adoption of general Regulation on Structural Funds.
Adoptarea de catre Comisie a procedurilor de implementare a Regulamentului
Relevant authorities submit RDPs
Statele Membre prezinta Planurile Nationale Strategice
2 months – max.
2 luni – max.
4 months after submission of NSPs
4 luni dupa prezentarea PNS
Negotiation of RDPs between Commission and Member States
Comisia si Statele Membre negociaza PNDR
6 months after submission of RDPs
6 luni dupa prezentarea PND
NSPs and RDPs begin
Inceperea PNS si PNDR
IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS FOR THE EFF
IN PROCESUL DE IMPLEMENTARE AL FEP
Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund
Regulamentul Consiliului (CE) no 1198/2006, din 27 iulie 2006, privind Fondul European pentru Pescuit.
By 31 December 2006
Data Cel mai tarziu la depunerea PON 31 Decembrie 2006
Commission may request Member States to amend NOPs
Comisia poate solicita Statelor Membre sa amendeze PON
Within two months of NOP submission
In decurs de doua luni de la prezentarea PON
The objectives of the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) are set out in Article 4.
In decurs de patru luni de la prezentarea PON acceptat
Up to four months after submission of agreed NOP
Aprobarea de catre Comisie a PON
NOPs begin
Implementarea PON
1 January 200721 December 2011
1 ianuarie 200721 Decembrie2011
Debate on NSP implementation lessons, organised by Commission and based on Member State written submissions
Dezbatere privind implementarea PNS, organizata de catre Comisie si bazata pe propunerile scrise ale Statelor Membre