natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court of Justice has issued a judgment on this subject (the Meroni doctrine, Case 98/80, Romano).
The Court of Justice has issued a judgment on this subject (the Meroni doctrine, Case 98/80, Romano).
Moreover, the Community legislator retains the power, on the Commission's initiative, to judge in each case during the normal codecision legislative procedure, whether it is appropriate to set up a specific regulatory agency by publishing a specific regulatory act to govern the organisation, operation and relations of that agency with the institutions and other bodies concerned.
Moreover, the Community legislator retains the power, on the Commission's initiative, to judge in each case during the normal codecision legislative procedure, whether it is appropriate to set up a specific regulatory agency by publishing a specific regulatory act to govern the organisation, operation and relations of that agency with the institutions and other bodies concerned.
The Community legislator likewise retains the power to decide whether it is appropriate to retain a particular agency or not.
The Community legislator likewise retains the power to decide whether it is appropriate to retain a particular agency or not.
The question of transparency and democratic control
The question of transparency and democratic control
Given that the European regulatory agencies are in large measure decentralised or independent services, there must be particular emphasis on transparency and democratic control of their formation and operation.
Given that the European regulatory agencies are in large measure decentralised or independent services, there must be particular emphasis on transparency and democratic control of their formation and operation.
Otherwise, the proliferation of regulatory or executive formations which have or claim exclusive competence to regulate crucial areas of social activities is at risk of reducing the importance of and supplanting the representative institutions of the EU and hugely inflating bureaucracy.
Otherwise, the proliferation of regulatory or executive formations which have or claim exclusive competence to regulate crucial areas of social activities is at risk of reducing the importance of and supplanting the representative institutions of the EU and hugely inflating bureaucracy.
The proposed approach – a common approach as far as possible – to the structure and operation of the agencies concerned seeks to restrict bureaucratic rigidity so that they can play their regulatory role correctly and effectively and can be supervised and so that the current requirements for auditing and accountability can, at least partially, be satisfied.
The proposed approach – a common approach as far as possible – to the structure and operation of the agencies concerned seeks to restrict bureaucratic rigidity so that they can play their regulatory role correctly and effectively and can be supervised and so that the current requirements for auditing and accountability can, at least partially, be satisfied.
The establishment of parliamentary control over the structure and the work of the regulatory agencies is consistent with the classic democratic principle requiring political responsibility of any body wielding executive power.
The establishment of parliamentary control over the structure and the work of the regulatory agencies is consistent with the classic democratic principle requiring political responsibility of any body wielding executive power.
The possibility of the European Parliament assigning political responsibility to the agencies concerned touches on a core principle of representative democracy, which consists in examining the legality and expediency of the choices made by the executive power.
The possibility of the European Parliament assigning political responsibility to the agencies concerned touches on a core principle of representative democracy, which consists in examining the legality and expediency of the choices made by the executive power.
A common framework for an interinstitutional approach should provide for institutional communication between the European Parliament and the regulatory agencies, which should principally consist in the submission of an annual report by each agency to the European Parliament, the possibility of inviting the director of the agency to appear before the competent European Parliament committee during the appointment procedure and, finally, the granting of discharge by Parliament for the execution of the budgets of those agencies which receive Community funding.
A common framework for an interinstitutional approach should provide for institutional communication between the European Parliament and the regulatory agencies, which should principally consist in the submission of an annual report by each agency to the European Parliament, the possibility of inviting the director of the agency to appear before the competent European Parliament committee during the appointment procedure and, finally, the granting of discharge by Parliament for the execution of the budgets of those agencies which receive Community funding.
The areas subject to parliamentary control could be defined more clearly and more effectively.
The areas subject to parliamentary control could be defined more clearly and more effectively.
Provision could be made, for example, for mandatory debate of the annual reports of the European regulatory agencies in the plenary of the European Parliament, making the information available to the public through that procedure.
Provision could be made, for example, for mandatory debate of the annual reports of the European regulatory agencies in the plenary of the European Parliament, making the information available to the public through that procedure.
Towards a common framework for interinstitutional control
Towards a common framework for interinstitutional control
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission’s proposal ‘Towards a common framework’ for interinstitutional dialogue, which will lead to a ‘common approach’, falls short of the European Parliament’s expectations of achieving an interinstitutional agreement.
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission’s proposal ‘Towards a common framework’ for interinstitutional dialogue, which will lead to a ‘common approach’, falls short of the European Parliament’s expectations of achieving an interinstitutional agreement.
Furthermore, it considers the common approach to be an interim step towards the adoption of a legally binding text.
Furthermore, it considers the common approach to be an interim step towards the adoption of a legally binding text.
Nevertheless, it appreciates the Commission's wish to find a way out of a situation of protracted interinstitutional inertia.
Nevertheless, it appreciates the Commission's wish to find a way out of a situation of protracted interinstitutional inertia.
The operating framework for the European regulatory agencies submitted by the Commission ( COM(2008)0135 ) could undoubtedly be more complete.
The operating framework for the European regulatory agencies submitted by the Commission ( COM(2008)0135 ) could undoubtedly be more complete.
However, it is possible to consider it as a constructive starting point for dialogue.
However, it is possible to consider it as a constructive starting point for dialogue.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes the setting up of an interinstitutional working group which will carry out a collective policy review of the experience gained from the activities of the regulatory agencies and whose mandate will be to clarify their position in the multilevel system of European governance.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes the setting up of an interinstitutional working group which will carry out a collective policy review of the experience gained from the activities of the regulatory agencies and whose mandate will be to clarify their position in the multilevel system of European governance.
Moreover, your rapporteur believes that the priority of seeking a ‘common framework’ for an interinstitutional understanding and approach lies in maximising the added value of the regulatory agencies in the European structures of governance in general by creating greater transparency, visible democratic control and improved efficiency.
Moreover, your rapporteur believes that the priority of seeking a ‘common framework’ for an interinstitutional understanding and approach lies in maximising the added value of the regulatory agencies in the European structures of governance in general by creating greater transparency, visible democratic control and improved efficiency.
ANEXĂ - LISTA AGENȚIILOR UNIUNII EUROPENE ȘI TABELUL RECAPITULATIV AL RESPONSABILITĂȚILOR PARLAMENTULUI
ANNEX - LIST OF EUROPEAN UNION AGENCIES AND SUMMARY OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
(sursă: Direcția Generală Politici Interne, coordonare legislativă și conciliere)
(source: Directorate General for Internal Policies, Legislative Coordination and Conciliation Unit)
Agenție de reglementare
Regulatory agency
Anul înființării
Year of creation
Prin codecizie la data înființării/
Codecision at the time of creation/
Comisia responsabilă
Specialised committee responsible
Membri în Consiliul de Administrație desemnați de PE
Nominees on the Board
Audierea directorului executiv înainte de numire
Hearing before the nomination of the Executive Director
Centrul European pentru Dezvoltarea Formării Profesionale (Cedefop)
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)
Fundația Europeană pentru Îmbunătățirea Condițiilor de Viață și de Muncă (Eurofound)
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (EUROFOUND)
Agenția Europeană de Mediu (AEM)
European Environment Agency (EEA)
Fundația Europeană de Formare (ETF)
European Training Foundation (ETF)
Observatorul European pentru Droguri și Toxicomanie (OEDT)
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
Agenția Europeană pentru Medicamente (EMEA)
European Medicines Agency (EMEA)
Oficiul pentru Armonizare în cadrul Pieței Interne (OAPI)
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Agenția Europeană pentru Sănătate și Securitate în Muncă (EU-OSHA)
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA)
Oficiul Comunitar pentru Soiuri de Plante (OCSP)
Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Centrul de Traduceri pentru Organismele Uniunii Europene (CdT)
Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT)
Agenția Europeană pentru Reconstrucție (AER)
European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)
Autoritatea Europeană pentru Siguranța Alimentară (EFSA))
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
14 membri numiți de Consiliu după consultarea Parlamentului
Parliament consulted on the 14 members appointed by the Council
Agenția Europeană pentru Siguranță Maritimă (EMSA)
European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA)
Agenția Europeană de Siguranță a Aviației (AESA)
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Agenția Europeană pentru Securitatea Rețelelor Informatice și a Datelor (ENISA)
European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA)
Centrul European de Prevenire și Control al Bolilor (ECDC)
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Agenției Europene a Căilor Ferate (AEF)
European Railway Agency (ERA)
Autoritatea Europeană de Supraveghere a Sistemelor de Navigație Globale prin Satelit (GNSS) (GSA)
European GNSS Supervisory Authority (GSA)
Agenția Europeană pentru Gestionarea Cooperării Operative la Frontierele Externe ale Statelor Membre ale Uniunii Europene (Frontex)
European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex)
Agenția Comunitară pentru Controlul Pescuitului (ACCP)
Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA)
Institutul European pentru Egalitatea de Șanse între Femei și Bărbați
European Institute for Gender Equality
Agenția Europeană pentru Produse Chimice (ECHA)
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
Agenția pentru Drepturi Fundamentale a Uniunii Europene (FRA), care a înlocuit Observatorul European al Fenomenelor Rasiste și Xenofobe
European Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), replacing the EUMC
Agenții de politică externă și de securitate comună (al doilea pilon):
Common Foreign and Security Policy Agencies (second pillar):
Agenție descentralizată
Decentralised Agency
Comisia responsabilă
Committee responsible
Institutul pentru Studii de Securitate al Uniunii Europene (ISSUE)
European Union Institute for security studies (ISS)
Centrul Satelitar al Uniunii Europene (CSUE)
European Union Satellite Centre (EUCS)
Agenția Europeană de Apărare (AEA)
European Defence Agency (EDA)
Agenții de cooperare polițienească și judiciară în materie penală (al treilea pilon):
Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters agencies (Third pillar):
Anul înființării
Year of Creation
Oficiul European de Poliție (Europol)
European Police Office (Europol)
Colegiul European de Poliție (CEPOL)
European Police College (CEPOL)
Unitatea Europeană de Cooperare Judiciară (Eurojust)
European Union's Judicial Cooperation Unit (Eurojust)
* Comisia responsabilă, astfel cum se prevede în Anexa VI la Regulamentul de procedură.
* Committee responsible as set out in Annex VI to the Rules of Procedure.
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru bugete
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets (*)
referitor la o strategie pentru rezolvarea viitoare a aspectelor instituționale ale agențiilor de reglementare
on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of Regulatory Agencies
(*) Comisii asociate – articolul 47 din Regulamentul de procedură
(*) Associated committee - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
Comisia pentru bugete recomandă Comisiei pentru afaceri constituționale, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. salută intenția Comisiei de a lansa o evaluare orizontală aprofundată a agențiilor de reglementare, examinând implicațiile reale ale creării și funcționării acestora în Uniune; consideră că, în acest cadru, trebuie instituite norme coerente de evaluare;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to launch a thorough horizontal evaluation of the regulatory agencies, examining the real implications of their creation and operation in the Union; believes that, in that framework, coherent evaluation rules need to be established;
5. consideră, prin urmare, că decizia Comisiei de a-și retrage propunerea pentru acest AII constituie o măsură pragmatică ce ar putea crea, simultan, o oportunitate de a căuta alte soluții, imperios necesare; este convins că, în interesul transparenței, este necesar un cadru orizontal pentru agenții, în ciuda naturii lor variate;
Considers, therefore, the Commission's decision to withdraw its proposal for this IIA a pragmatic step that might at the same time create an opportunity to search for other solutions which need to be found as a matter of urgency; is convinced that, for the sake of transparency, some kind of a horizontal framework is necessary for the agencies, despite their variation in character;
7. dorește să reitereze importanța asigurării sistematice la nivel interinstituțional a aplicării procedurii prevăzute la punctul 47 din Acordul interinstituțional din 17 mai 2006 privind disciplina bugetară și buna gestiune financiară
Wishes to reiterate the importance of securing on a systematic basis at interinstitutional level the application of the procedure laid down in Point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
(AII din 17 mai 2006) și subliniază necesitatea de a asigura monitorizarea adecvată a Declarației comune din 13 iulie 2007 a Parlamentului European, Consiliului și Comisiei cu privire la agențiile descentralizate;
(IIA of 17 May 2006) and stresses the need to ensure appropriate follow up of the Joint Statement of 13 July 2007 by the Parliament, the Council and the Commission on decentralised agencies;
9. insistă, în plus, în cazul agențiilor deja existente, asupra necesității de a efectua evaluări periodice, de o manieră coordonată și coerentă, privind rentabilitatea recurgerii la o agenție comparativ cu îndeplinirea sarcinilor relevante de către serviciile Comisiei;
Insists that, in addition, for the agencies already in existence, regular evaluation has to be carried out, in a coordinated and coherent manner, on whether the agency option is more cost-effective than having the relevant tasks performed by the Commission departments themselves;
(Regulamentul financiar);
(Financial Regulation);
Agenții noi - legătura dintre procedurile legislative și prerogativele bugetare
New agencies - Link between legislative procedures and budgetary prerogatives
Agenții existente - controlul
Existing agencies - Monitoring
- relevanță: în ce măsură s-au dovedit relevante obiectivele prevăzute în regulamentul de instituire al unei agenții, față de nivelul fondurilor publice aprobate în buget?
- Relevance: To what extent were the objectives foreseen by the founding regulation of an agency relevant for the level of public spending authorised in the budget?
- eficacitate: ce efecte (impact) au avut activitățile desfășurate de agenție?
- Effectiveness: Which effects (impact) have been obtained by the activity of the agency?
1. reamintește că în 2005 Comisia a propus un acord interinstituțional cu scopul de a institui un cadru orizontal pentru crearea, structura, funcționarea, evaluarea și controlul agențiilor europene de reglementare;
Recalls that in 2005 the Commission proposed an interinstitutional agreement intended to create a horizontal framework for the creation, structure, operation, evaluation and control of European regulatory agencies;
4. subliniază faptul că importanța agențiilor în cadrul administrativ al UE impune ca instituțiile UE să cadă de acord asupra scopului și rolului agențiilor, ceea ce lipsește în prezent;
Stresses that the importance of agencies in the EU's administrative framework calls for a common understanding between the EU institutions of the purpose and role of agencies, which, at the present time, is lacking;
· retrage propunerea sa de elaborare a unui acord interinstituțional;
· withdraw its proposal for an interinstitutional agreement;
· realiza o evaluare orizontală a agențiilor de reglementare până la sfârșitul anului 2009 și de a prezenta Parlamentului și Consiliului rezultatele studiului cât mai curând posibil;
· undertake a horizontal evaluation of the regulatory agencies by the end of 2009, and to report as soon as possible to Parliament and the Council on the results;
· nu propune crearea de noi agenții de reglementare până la finalizarea acestei evaluări;
· propose no new regulatory agencies until this evaluation has been completed;
6. subliniază că, conform cifrelor furnizate de Comisie în comunicarea sa, în prezent există 29 de agenții de reglementare care au aproximativ 3 800 de angajați, cu un buget anual de aproximativ 1 100 milioane euro, inclusiv contribuția comunitară de aproximativ 559 milioane euro;
Points out that, according to the figures provided by the Commission in its Communication, there are currently 29 regulatory agencies, which employ some 3 800 staff, with an annual budget of around EUR 1 100 million, including a Community contribution of around EUR 559 million;
5/2008 al Curții de Conturi Europene privind buna gestiune financiară a agențiilor, o atenție deosebită fiind acordată auditurilor performanței;
Draws attention to the European Court of Auditors' special report No 5/2008 on the sound financial management of agencies with particular reference to performance audits;
· nevoia unei abordări standard a agențiilor cu privire la prezentarea activităților desfășurate în exercițiul financiar respectiv și la prezentarea conturilor acestora și a rapoartelor privind gestiunea bugetară și financiară;
· the need for a standard approach among the agencies with regard to the presentation of their activities during the financial year in question, and of their accounts and reports on budgetary and financial management;
· o cerință standard pentru toți directorii de agenții de a întocmi și semna o declarație de asigurare, inclusiv eventuale rezerve acolo unde este cazul;
· a standard requirement for all directors of agencies to draw up and sign a statement of assurance, including reservations where necessary;
· un model armonizat aplicat tuturor agențiilor și organismelor descentralizate în care să se facă clar distincția între
· a harmonised model applicable to all agencies and satellite bodies clearly distinguishing between
- un raport anual destinat publicului larg privind operațiunile, activitatea și realizările organismului;
- an annual report intended for a general readership on the body's operations, work and achievements;
- situațiile financiare și un raport privind execuția bugetului;
- financial statements and a report on the implementation of the budget;
- un raport de activitate similar rapoartelor de activitate ale directorilor generali din cadrul Comisiei;
- an activity report along the lines of the activity reports of the Directors-General of the Commission;
- o declarație de asigurare semnată de directorul organismului, însoțită de eventuale rezerve sau observații pe care directorul consideră oportun să le aducă la cunoștința autorității abilitate să acorde descărcarea de gestiune;
- a declaration of assurance signed by the body's director, together with any reservations or observations which the director considers it appropriate to draw to the attention of the discharge authority;
· nevoia de a defini principiile de stabilire a faptului dacă și în ce măsură taxele și plățile ar trebui să fie o sursă de finanțare pentru agenții;
· the need to define the principles for determining whether and to what extent fees and payments should be a source of funding for agencies;
· nevoia de a revizui în mod constant agențiile existente și de a stabili criteriile pe baza cărora să se determine dacă o agenție de reglementare și-a atins scopul și poate fi desființată.
· the need to conduct a rolling review of the need for existing agencies and to establish criteria to determine when a regulatory agency has fulfilled its purpose and can be wound up.
referitor la o strategie pentru viitoarea stabilire a aspectelor instituţionale ale agenţiilor de reglementare
on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of Regulatory Agencies
Comisia pentru afaceri economice şi monetare recomandă Comisiei pentru afaceri constituţionale, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluţie ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
7. subliniază că principiile bunei guvernări solicită garantarea pe deplin a următoarelor elemente: independenţă, control democratic, transparenţă şi participarea părţilor interesate la funcţionarea agenţiei de reglementare;
Highlights that the principles of good governance require that the following be fully guaranteed: independence, democratic control, transparency and the participation of stakeholders in the functioning of the regulatory agency;
Cauza 9/56 Meroni/Înalta Autoritate [1957/58] Rec.
Reiterates that all agencies must be democratically accountable to the EU institutions, must be established in accordance with the Meroni judgement
133. şi trebuie să funcţioneze întotdeauna în conformitate cu principiul proporţionalităţii şi, în cazul în care misiunea lor acoperă chestiuni dintr-un domeniu de competenţă partajată, în conformitate cu principiul subsidiarităţii;
Case 9/56 Meroni v. High Authority [1957/58] ECR 133. and must at all times operate with respect for the principle of proportionality and, when their mission deals with issues in an area of shared competence, with respect for the principle of subsidiarity;