natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(ii) Datele de monitorizare indică o diseminare la distanţă mare în mediul ambiant a substanţei active, prin intermediul aerului sau al apei, cu posibilitatea de transfer într-un mediu receptor sau
(ii) Monitoring data showing that long-range environmental transport of the active substance, with the potential for transfer to a receiving environment, may have occurred via air or water;
There is no scientific justification for a reference to migratory species.
There is no scientific justification for a reference to migratory species.
Anexa II 3.7.2 - 3.7.3
Annex II 3.7.2 - 3.7.3
Evaluarea persistenţei în mediu se bazează pe datele privind perioada de înjumătăţire colectate în condiţii adecvate, descrise de solicitant.
Assessment of persistency in the environment shall be based on available half-life data collected under appropriate conditions, which shall be described by the applicant.
- concentraţia fără efecte observate pe termen lung (CFEO) pe speciile de apă de mare sau apă dulce este mai mică de 0,01 mg/l, sau
– the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0.01 mg/l, or
- substanţa activă este clasificată drept carcinogenă (categoria 1 sau 2), mutagenă (categoria 1 sau 2) sau toxică pentru reproducere (categoria 1, 2 sau 3) sau
– the substance is classified as carcinogenic (category 1 or 2), mutagenic (category 1 or 2), or toxic for reproduction (category 1, 2, or 3), or
- există alte dovezi de toxicitate cronică, identificate pe baza clasificărilor: T, R48 sau Xn, R48, în conformitate cu Directiva 67/548/CEE.
– there is other evidence of chronic toxicity, as identified by the classifications: T, R48 or Xn, R48 pursuant to Directive 67/548/EEC.
O substanţă care îndeplineşte ambele criterii specificate în secţiunile de mai jos este o substanţă vPvB.
A substance that fulfils both of the criteria of the sections below is a vPvB substance.
- perioada de înjumătăţire în apă de mare, apă dulce sau de estuar este mai mare de 60 de zile sau
– the half-life in marine, fresh- or estuarine water is higher than 60 days, or
Anexa II 3.8.2
Annex II 3.8.2
Anexa II 4
Annex II 4
- satisfac două dintre criteriile definitorii ale substanţelor PBT;
– it meets two of the criteria to be considered as a PBT substance;
Substanţele active sunt clasificate şi aprobate ca substanţe susceptibile de înlocuire, în conformitate cu articolul 24, atunci când:
An active substance shall be classified and approved as a candidate for substitution pursuant to Article 24 where:
- există motive de îngrijorare legate de natura efectelor critice care, în combinaţie cu modurile tipice de utilizare/expunere, conduc la situaţii în care utilizarea lor ar continua să fie îngrijorătoare chiar dacă s-ar adopta măsuri foarte severe de reducere a riscurilor (cum ar fi suplimentarea echipamentului personal de protecţie sau zonele tampon de mari dimensiuni);
– there are reasons for concern linked to the nature of the critical effects which, in combination with the use/exposure patterns, amount to situations of use that could still cause concern, even with very restrictive risk management measures (such as extensive personal protective equipment or very large buffer zones);
- conţin o proporţie semnificativă de izomeri inactivi.
– it contains a significant proportion of non-active isomers.
- pe baza evaluării testelor de genotoxicitate de nivel superior efectuate în conformitate cu cerinţele documentare formulate pentru substanţele active şi produsele fitosanitare şi a celorlaltor date şi informaţii disponibile, sunt clasificate, în conformitate cu dispoziţiile Directivei 67/548/CEE, ca mutageni de categoria 1 sau 2, cu excepţia cazului în care expunerea omului la acţiunea respectivei substanţe active din compoziţia unui produs fitosanitar este, în condiţiile de utilizare realiste propuse, neglijabilă.
– on the basis of assessment of higher tier genotoxicity testing carried out in accordance with the data requirements for the active substances and the plant protection products and other available data and information, it is classified, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC, as mutagen category 1 or 2 unless the exposure of humans to that active substance in a plant protection product, under realistic proposed conditions of use, is negligible.
- pe baza evaluării testelor de carcinotoxicitate efectuate în conformitate cu cerinţele documentare formulate pentru substanţele active şi produsele fitosanitare şi a celorlaltor date şi informaţii disponibile, sunt sau trebuie să fie clasificate, în conformitate cu dispoziţiile Directivei 67/548/CEE, drept carcinogeni de categoria 1 sau 2, cu excepţia cazului în care expunerea omului la acţiunea respectivei substanţe active din compoziţia unui produs fitosanitar este, în condiţiile de utilizare realiste propuse, neglijabilă.
– on the basis of assessment of carcinogenicity testing carried out in accordance with the data requirements for the active substances and the plant protection products and other available data and information, it is or has to be classified, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 67/548/EEC, as carcinogen category 1 or 2 unless the exposure of humans to that active substance in a plant protection product, under realistic proposed conditions of use is negligible.
- pe baza evaluării testelor de toxicitate reproductivă efectuate în conformitate cu cerinţele documentare formulate pentru substanţele active şi produsele fitosanitare şi a celorlaltor date şi informaţii disponibile, sunt sau trebuie să fie clasificate, în conformitate cu dispoziţiile Directivei 67/548/CEE, drept toxice pentru reproducere de categoria 1 sau 2, cu excepţia cazului în care expunerea omului la acţiunea respectivei substanţe active din compoziţia unui produs fitosanitar este, în condiţiile de utilizare realiste propuse, neglijabilă.
- on the basis of assessment of reproductive toxicity testing carried out in accordance with the data requirements for the active substances and the plant protection products and other available data and information, it is or has to be classified, in accordance with Directive 67/548/EEC, as toxic for reproduction category 1 or 2 unless the exposure of humans to that active substance in a plant protection product, under realistic proposed conditions of use, is negligible.
- sunt considerate drept substanţe persistente, bioacumulatoare şi toxice (PBT).
- it is considered to be a persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic (PBT) substance.
O substanţă care îndeplineşte toate cele trei criterii specificate mai jos este o substanţă PBT.
A substance that fulfils all three of the criteria below is a PBT substance.
- perioada de înjumătăţire în apă dulce sau de estuar este mai mare de 40 de zile sau
– the half-life in fresh or estuarine water is higher than 40 days,
- concentraţia fără efecte observate pe termen lung (CFEO) pe organismele de apă de mare sau apă dulce este mai mică de 0,01 mg/l, sau
– the long-term no-observed effect concentration (NOEC) for marine or freshwater organisms is less than 0.01 mg/l, or
- sunt foarte persistente şi foarte bioacumulatoare (vPvB).
- it is very persistent and very bioaccumulating (vPvB).
O substanţă care îndeplineşte ambele criterii specificate mai jos este o substanţă vPvB.
A substance that fulfils both of the criteria below is a vPvB substance.
Substanţele active îndeplinesc criteriul de bioacumulare în cazul în care factorul de bioconcentraţie este mai mare de 5000.
An active substance fulfils the very bioaccumulative criterion where the bioconcentration factor is greater than 5000.
Anexa IV punctul 3 primul paragraf
Annex IV, point 3, subparagraph 1
Un dezavantaj practic sau economic semnificativ pentru utilizator constă, prin definiţie, dintr-o atingere cuantificabilă importantă adusă sistemului său de lucru sau activităţii sale comerciale, conducând la imposibilitatea exercitării unui control suficient de strict asupra speciei ţintă.
Significant practical or economic disadvantage to the user is defined as a major quantifiable impairment of working practices or business activity leading to inability to maintain sufficient control of the target organism.
O astfel de atingere majoră s-ar putea produce, de exemplu, atunci când echipamentul tehnic necesar utilizării substanţei/lor alternative nu este disponibil sau nu poate fi realizat din punct de vedere economic.
Such a major impairment might be, for example, where no technical facilities for the use of the alternative substance(s) are available or economically feasible.
Un dezavantaj practic sau economic semnificativ pentru utilizator constă, prin definiţie, dintr-o atingere cuantificabilă importantă adusă sistemului său de lucru sau activităţii sale comerciale, conducând la imposibilitatea exercitării unui control suficient de strict asupra speciei ţintă sau o atingere adusă competitivităţii în domeniul agricol .
Significant practical or economic disadvantage to the user is defined as a major quantifiable impairment of working practices or business activity leading to inability to maintain sufficient control of the target organism or impairment of the competitiveness of agricultural activity .
Anexa IV 3 paragraful 2a (nou)
Annex IV 3, subparagraph 2 a (new)
Evaluarea comparativă ia în considerare aplicaţiile minore autorizate.
The comparative assessment shall take authorised minor users into account.
See justification for amendment to Article 48, paragraph 1, point (c).
See justification for amendment to Article 48, paragraph 1, point (c).
– având în vedere recomandarea Comisiei prezentată Consiliului ( COM(2007)0277 ).,
– having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council ( COM(2007)0277 ),
– având în vedere articolul 3 alineatul (4) din Actul de aderare a Bulgariei şi României, în temeiul căruia a fost consultat de către Consiliu ( C6-0238/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0238/2007 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru libertăţi civile, justiţie şi afaceri interne ( A6‑0360/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committeе on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0360/2007 ),
(4a) Guvernele Bulgariei şi României au făcut eforturi pentru a atinge obiectivele respective prevăzute în vederea activării procedurii simplificate de aderare,
(4a) The Bulgarian and Romanian governments have made efforts to meet the respective benchmarks provided for the activation of the simplified accession procedure,
Aderarea Bulgariei şi a României la Convenţia din 26 iulie 1995 privind protecţia intereselor financiare ale Comunităţilor Europene, precum şi la diverse protocoale la convenţia respectivă
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests and to the various Protocols to the Convention
privind propunerea de decizie a Consiliului privind încheierea unui al doilea protocol adiţional la Acordul de asociere între Comunitatea Europeană şi statele sale membre, pe de o parte, şi Republica Chile, pe de altă parte, pentru a ţine seama de aderarea Republicii Bulgaria şi a României la Uniunea Europeană
on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of a Second Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– având în vedere propunerea de decizie a Consiliului (12550/2007)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (12550/2007)
– având în vedere al doilea protocol adiţional la Acordul de asociere între Comunitatea Europeană şi statele sale membre, pe de o parte, şi Republica Chile, pe de altă parte, pentru a ţine seama de aderarea Republicii Bulgaria şi a României la Uniunea Europeană,
– having regard to the Second Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union,
– având în vedere cererea de aviz conform prezentată de Consiliu în conformitate cu articolul 300 alineatul (3) al doilea paragraf, coroborat cu articolul 310 şi articolul 300 alineatul (2) primul paragraf prima şi a doua teză din Tratatul CE ( C6-0325/2007 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 310 and Article 300(2) first subparagraph, first and second sentence of the EC Treaty ( C6‑0325/2007 ),
– având în vedere articolul 75, articolul 83 alineatul (7) şi articolul 43 alineatul (1)din Regulamentul său de procedură,
– having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– având în vedere recomandarea Comisiei pentru comerţ internaţional ( A6-0361/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0361/2007 ),
Încheierea protocolului la Acordul de asociere CE/Chile pentru a ţine seama de aderarea Bulgariei şi a României la UE
Conclusion of a Protocol to the Association Agreement between the EC and Chile to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
referitor la propunerea de Decizie-cadru a Consiliului privind aplicarea principiului recunoaşterii reciproce a hotărârilor judecătoreşti în materie penală care impun pedepse sau măsuri privative de libertate în scopul executării lor în Uniunea Europeană
on the draft Council Framework Decision on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgements in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union
(Consultare repetată)
(Renewed consultation)
(Procedura de consultare - consultare repetată)
(Consultation procedure - renewed consultation)
– având în vedere propunerea Consiliului (9688/2007)
– having regard to the Council draft (9688/2007)
– având în vedere iniţiativa Republicii Austria, Republicii Finlanda şi a Regatului Suediei (7307/2005)
– having regard to the initiative by the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden (7307/2005)
JO C 150, 21.6.2005, p.
OJ C 150, 21.6.2005, p.
– având în vedere poziţia sa din 14 iunie 2006
– having regard to its position of 14 June 2006
Texte adoptate, P6_TA(2006)0256 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0256 . ,
– având în vedere articolul 31 alineatul (1) litera (a) şi articolul 34 alineatul (2) litera (b) din Tratatul UE,
– having regard to Articles 31(1)(a) and 34(2)(b) of the EC Treaty of the European Union,
– având în vedere articolul 39 alineatul (1) din Tratatul UE, în temeiul căruia a fost consultat de către Consiliu ( C6‑0209/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0209/2007 )),
– având în vedere articolul 93, articolul 51 şi articolul 55 alineatul (3) din Regulamentul său de procedură,
– having regard to Rules 93, 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru libertăţi civile, justiţie şi afaceri interne ( A6‑0362/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0362/2007 ),
Text propus de Consiliu
Text proposed by the Council
Ordinul european de execuţie şi transferul persoanelor condamnate
European enforcement order and the transfer of sentenced persons
referitor la propunerea de decizie a Consiliului privind încheierea Acordului dintre Comunitatea Europeană şi Ucraina privind facilitarea eliberării vizelor de scurtă şedere
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas
AVIZUL COMISIEI PENTRU AFACERI EXTERNE ................................................................7
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...................................................7
– având în vedere propunerea de decizie a Consiliului ( COM(2007)0190 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0190 ),
– având în vedere articolul 63 alineatul (3) litera (b) şi articolul 300 alineatul (2) primul paragraf prima teză din Tratatul CE,
– having regard to Articles 63(3)(b) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– având în vedere articolul 300 alineatul (3) primul paragraf din Tratatul CE, în temeiul căruia a fost consultat de către Consiliu ( C6-0187/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0187/2007 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru libertăţi civile, justiţie şi afaceri interne şi avizul Comisiei pentru afaceri externe ( A6-0363/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0363/2007 ),
AVIZUL COMISIEI PENTRU AFACERI EXTERNE
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas
Your draftsman believes that the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas, in parallel to the readmission agreement, demonstrates a considerable step forward in implementing the ENP Action Plan endorsed by the EU-Ukraine Co-operation Council on 21 February 2005 as well as in fulfilling the objectives of facilitating mobility, managing migration and promoting people-to-people exchanges as outlined in the communication of the European Commission on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (COM(2006)726).
Your draftsman believes that the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Ukraine on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas, in parallel to the readmission agreement, demonstrates a considerable step forward in implementing the ENP Action Plan endorsed by the EU-Ukraine Co-operation Council on 21 February 2005 as well as in fulfilling the objectives of facilitating mobility, managing migration and promoting people-to-people exchanges as outlined in the communication of the European Commission on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (COM(2006)726).
The "package deal" on the two agreements is mutually beneficial for the EU and Ukraine.
The "package deal" on the two agreements is mutually beneficial for the EU and Ukraine.
The agreement is the second in line following the one negotiated with the Russian Federation.
The agreement is the second in line following the one negotiated with the Russian Federation.
It is broader in its scope that duly reflects the more ambitious co-operation agenda pursued by the parties in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy.
It is broader in its scope that duly reflects the more ambitious co-operation agenda pursued by the parties in the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy.
Your draftsman welcomes that the agreement on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas introduces strict procedural deadlines, sets preferential visa fees including a full visa fee waiver for certain categories of persons (e.g. close relatives, students, journalists, children, pensioners and persons participating in cultural, educational exchange programmes and sport events), and provides for a simplified procedure in a number of cases.
Your draftsman welcomes that the agreement on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas introduces strict procedural deadlines, sets preferential visa fees including a full visa fee waiver for certain categories of persons (e.g. close relatives, students, journalists, children, pensioners and persons participating in cultural, educational exchange programmes and sport events), and provides for a simplified procedure in a number of cases.
The agreement also includes a reference to the introduction of a visa-free travel regime for the citizens of Ukraine as a long term perspective.
The agreement also includes a reference to the introduction of a visa-free travel regime for the citizens of Ukraine as a long term perspective.
Your draftsman is of the view, that in the framework of the new enhanced agreement which is now being negotiated with Ukraine, a road-map of necessary steps towards visa facilitation for broader groups of the Ukrainian society, and, in the longer term, towards a visa-free travel regime should be envisaged.
Your draftsman is of the view, that in the framework of the new enhanced agreement which is now being negotiated with Ukraine, a road-map of necessary steps towards visa facilitation for broader groups of the Ukrainian society, and, in the longer term, towards a visa-free travel regime should be envisaged.
Your draftsman calls on both parties for a speedy ratification so that the two agreements can enter into force on 1 January 2008.
Your draftsman calls on both parties for a speedy ratification so that the two agreements can enter into force on 1 January 2008.
Your draftsman draws attention to the fact that on 31 March 2005 President Yuschenko signed a decree "On Temporary Introduction of the visa-free regime for citizens of the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation".
Your draftsman draws attention to the fact that on 31 March 2005 President Yuschenko signed a decree "On Temporary Introduction of the visa-free regime for citizens of the Member States of the European Union and the Swiss Confederation".
The decree established a visa-free regime of entry for 25 Member States of the EU and the Swiss Confederation.
The decree established a visa-free regime of entry for 25 Member States of the EU and the Swiss Confederation.
The visa-free regime in its present form is extended to an unlimited period and also introduced for Iceland and Norway's citizens.
The visa-free regime in its present form is extended to an unlimited period and also introduced for Iceland and Norway's citizens.
However, it does not apply to citizens of Bulgaria and Romania.
However, it does not apply to citizens of Bulgaria and Romania.
While recognising that the visa-free regime introduced by Ukraine is a unilateral gesture of goodwill and its automatic extension to the Member States of the EU that joined after its introduction is not compulsory according to the principle of reciprocity, your draftsman considers that the EU, guided by the principle of solidarity, rightly insists on the inclusion of Bulgaria and Romania in the visa-free regime thus ensuring equal treatment for all EU Member States.
While recognising that the visa-free regime introduced by Ukraine is a unilateral gesture of goodwill and its automatic extension to the Member States of the EU that joined after its introduction is not compulsory according to the principle of reciprocity, your draftsman considers that the EU, guided by the principle of solidarity, rightly insists on the inclusion of Bulgaria and Romania in the visa-free regime thus ensuring equal treatment for all EU Member States.
Such extension would greatly contribute to a speedy ratification process of the two agreements as well as give new impetus to the ongoing negotiations on an enhanced co-operation agreement between the European Community and Ukraine.
Such extension would greatly contribute to a speedy ratification process of the two agreements as well as give new impetus to the ongoing negotiations on an enhanced co-operation agreement between the European Community and Ukraine.