natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Considers that interest should not focus primarily on the constant use of PPPs but rather on the sustainability of agricultural production with reference to food security, the health of consumers, the supply of clean drinking water, the conservation of diverse flora and fauna and the health of those working in agricultural occupations; takes the view that the use of PPPs may be a tool in this connection, but that it should be subject to special rules on account of the potential damage they may cause to health;
Considers that interest should not focus primarily on the constant use of PPPs but rather on the sustainability of agricultural production with reference to food security, the health of consumers, the supply of clean drinking water, the conservation of diverse flora and fauna and the health of those working in agricultural occupations; takes the view that the use of PPPs may be a tool in this connection, but that it should be subject to special rules on account of the potential damage they may cause to health;
Points to the need for the dissemination of farming practices promoting the use of lower pesticide doses (among other things, integrated production and organic farming), which will contribute to an overall decrease in pesticide use;
Points to the need for the dissemination of farming practices promoting the use of lower pesticide doses (among other things, integrated production and organic farming), which will contribute to an overall decrease in pesticide use;
Points out that sustainable resistance management and the further development of plant protection methods are contingent on the availability of a sufficiently broad range of plant protection products and agents, which will also increase support amongst farmers and other operators for the various legal acts regulating their use and reduce failure to comply therewith;
Points out that sustainable resistance management and the further development of plant protection methods are contingent on the availability of a sufficiently broad range of plant protection products and agents, which will also increase support amongst farmers and other operators for the various legal acts regulating their use and reduce failure to comply therewith;
Points out that the EU has now adopted more than a dozen legal acts which directly or indirectly regulate the use of PPPs; stresses, however, that the proposed provisions governing the use of PPPs are leading in the right direction;
Points out that the EU has now adopted more than a dozen legal acts which directly or indirectly regulate the use of PPPs; stresses, however, that the proposed provisions governing the use of PPPs are leading in the right direction;
Urges that decisions on the use of authorised PPPs must be left to farmers under the guidance of suitably qualified advisers; considers that rules and checks must allow leeway for such decisions depending on the particular circumstances within the various Member States;
Urges that decisions on the use of authorised PPPs must be left to farmers under the guidance of suitably qualified advisers; considers that rules and checks must allow leeway for such decisions depending on the particular circumstances within the various Member States;
Emphasises that Community legislation should not set general quantitative restrictions, as this could encourage farmers and other operators to use substances which are less voluminous but more hazardous;
Emphasises that Community legislation should not set general quantitative restrictions, as this could encourage farmers and other operators to use substances which are less voluminous but more hazardous;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide adequate funding for information, advisory and training programmes; points out that such measures do more to improve the situation than additional documentation or reporting requirements; across-the-board monitoring is completely unrealistic anyway;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide adequate funding for information, advisory and training programmes; points out that such measures do more to improve the situation than additional documentation or reporting requirements; across-the-board monitoring is completely unrealistic anyway;
Urges that the proposed provisions should not increase the burden on farmers by creating unnecessary red tape, but that instead the opportunity offered by the comprehensive harmonisation process should be taken to simplify monitoring procedures without making them less effective;
Urges that the proposed provisions should not increase the burden on farmers by creating unnecessary red tape, but that instead the opportunity offered by the comprehensive harmonisation process should be taken to simplify monitoring procedures without making them less effective;
Urges that the planned statistics regulation should not impose new burdens on farmers;
Urges that the planned statistics regulation should not impose new burdens on farmers;
Points out that many aspects of the integrated plant protection management system, which will be binding as from 2014, are still unclear, a state of affairs which, in conjunction with cross-compliance, may give rise to legal uncertainty and considerable feelings of insecurity among farmers;
Points out that many aspects of the integrated plant protection management system, which will be binding as from 2014, are still unclear, a state of affairs which, in conjunction with cross-compliance, may give rise to legal uncertainty and considerable feelings of insecurity among farmers;
Urges that voluntary and supportive measures should be employed in preference to binding provisions; it is for the Member States to take a decision on the correct mix of instruments, after analysing the local situation in the context of national action plans;
Urges that voluntary and supportive measures should be employed in preference to binding provisions; it is for the Member States to take a decision on the correct mix of instruments, after analysing the local situation in the context of national action plans;
Calls for national action plans to be drawn up in close consultation with the farming sector, in a transparent manner, taking account of the environmental impact of such measures and ensuring that the objectives are verifiable; advocates Community co-funding for national action plans; considers that the public must be provided with comprehensive information; regular revisions of the action plans are needed in order to compel the Member States to maintain their efforts;
Calls for national action plans to be drawn up in close consultation with the farming sector, in a transparent manner, taking account of the environmental impact of such measures and ensuring that the objectives are verifiable; advocates Community co-funding for national action plans; considers that the public must be provided with comprehensive information; regular revisions of the action plans are needed in order to compel the Member States to maintain their efforts;
Warmly welcomes the further harmonisation of provisions in the area of the authorisation and marketing of PPPs; points out, however, that the procedures must be streamlined and optimised and made more predictable in order to facilitate access to the market for innovative products which generally involve a lesser degree of risk; the opportunity offered by the harmonisation process should also be taken to eliminate instances of legal uncertainty;
Warmly welcomes the further harmonisation of provisions in the area of the authorisation and marketing of PPPs; points out, however, that the procedures must be streamlined and optimised and made more predictable in order to facilitate access to the market for innovative products which generally involve a lesser degree of risk; the opportunity offered by the harmonisation process should also be taken to eliminate instances of legal uncertainty;
Calls on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers;
Calls on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers;
Calls on the Commission, working together with the Member States and the industry, to take measures to prevent the import and marketing of counterfeit and/or unauthorised PPPs;
Calls on the Commission, working together with the Member States and the industry, to take measures to prevent the import and marketing of counterfeit and/or unauthorised PPPs;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that when levels of pesticides which exceed the relevant limit values are found on and in imported foodstuffs the same measures are taken and the same penalties are imposed as in the case of products manufactured in the EU; calls for immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States in the same way, so that European farmers and manufacturers are not placed at a disadvantage and a level playing field is established within the EU;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that when levels of pesticides which exceed the relevant limit values are found on and in imported foodstuffs the same measures are taken and the same penalties are imposed as in the case of products manufactured in the EU; calls for immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States in the same way, so that European farmers and manufacturers are not placed at a disadvantage and a level playing field is established within the EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make adequate resources available for resistance research, for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make adequate resources available for resistance research, for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives;
Calls for appropriate controls and a ban on imports into the EU of foodstuffs produced using plant protection products and pesticides whose use and marketing are not permitted in the EU;
Calls for appropriate controls and a ban on imports into the EU of foodstuffs produced using plant protection products and pesticides whose use and marketing are not permitted in the EU;
Calls for coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides;
Calls for coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides;
Calls for Community funding to be provided for the recycling of pesticides, given that within the EU more than 200 000 tonnes of pesticides are still being stored in both underground dumps and open-air stockpiles;
Calls for Community funding to be provided for the recycling of pesticides, given that within the EU more than 200 000 tonnes of pesticides are still being stored in both underground dumps and open-air stockpiles;
Calls on the Commission to formulate a protection and cooperation policy vis-à-vis the EU's neighbours, on the use of pesticide and plant protection products.
Calls on the Commission to formulate a protection and cooperation policy vis-à-vis the EU's neighbours, on the use of pesticide and plant protection products.
-Corina Creţu
Corina Creţu
privind propunerea de directivă a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului de modificare a Directivei 2001/18/CE privind diseminarea deliberată în mediu a organismelor modificate genetic, cu privire la competenţele de executare conferite Comisiei
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/18/CE concerning the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, as regards the implementing powers conferred to the Commission
– având în vedere propunerea Comisiei prezentată Parlamentului European şi Consiliului (COM[(2006)0920])
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0920 )
– având în vedere articolul 251 alineatul (2) şi articolul 95 din Tratatul CE, în temeiul cărora propunerea a fost prezentată de către Comisie (C[6‑0031/2007]),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0031/2007 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru mediu, sănătate publică şi siguranţă alimentară ( A6‑0292/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0292/2007 ),
Articolul 7 alineatul (3) partea introductivă (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Article 7, paragraph 3, introductory part (Directive 2001/18/EC)
Această decizie este luată în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât este destinată modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
This decision shall be taken in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since it is designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Decizia respectivă stabileşte cantitatea minimă de informaţii tehnice din anexa III, necesară pentru evaluarea oricăror riscuri previzibile în urma diseminării, în special:”
This decision shall establish the minimum amount of technical information from Annex III necessary for evaluating any foreseeable risks from the release, in particular:"
Articolul 18 alineatul (1) (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Article 18, paragraph 1 (Directive 2001/18/EC)
„(1) În cazurile în care o autoritate competentă sau Comisia ridică şi menţine o obiecţie în conformitate cu articolele 15, 17 şi 20, se adoptă şi se publică o decizie în termen de 120 de zile.
In cases where an objection is raised and maintained by a competent authority or the Commission in accordance with Articles 15, 17 and 20, a decision shall be adopted and published within 120 days.
Decizia respectivă conţine aceleaşi informaţii ca la articolul 19 alineatul (3).
This decision shall contain the same information as in Article 19(3).
Decizia se adoptă în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât este destinată modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
It shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since it is designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
În scopul calculării perioadei de 120 de zile, nu se ia în considerare perioada de timp în care Comisia aşteaptă informaţii suplimentare pe care le-a solicitat notificatorului sau aşteaptă avizul Comitetului ştiinţific care a fost consultat în conformitate cu articolul 28.
For the purpose of calculating the 120 day period, any period of time during which the Commission is awaiting further information which it may have requested from the notifier or is seeking the opinion of a Scientific Committee which has been consulted in accordance with Article 28 shall not be taken into account.
Comisia menţionează motivele pentru fiecare solicitare de informaţii suplimentare şi informează autorităţile competente cu privire la cerinţele sale faţă de notificator.
The Commission shall state reasons in any request for further information and inform the competent authorities of its requests to the notifier.
Perioada de timp în care Comisia aşteaptă avizul Comitetului ştiinţific nu depăşeşte 90 de zile.
The period of time during which the Commission is awaiting the opinion of the Scientific Committee shall not exceed 90 days.
Nu se ia în considerare perioada de timp în care Parlamentul European şi Consiliul acţionează în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3).”
The period of time that the European Parliament and the Council take to act in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) shall not be taken into account."
Articolul 21 alineatul (3) (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Article 21, paragraph 3 (Directive 2001/18/EC)
„(3) În ceea ce priveşte produsele destinate transformării directe, alineatul (1) nu se aplică urmelor de OMG-uri autorizate prezente într-o proporţie care nu depăşeşte pragul de 0,9 % sau pragurile mai reduse, cu condiţia ca aceste urme să fie accidentale sau tehnic inevitabile.
For products intended for direct processing, paragraph 1 shall not apply to traces of authorised GMOs in a proportion no higher than 0,9 % or lower thresholds, provided that these traces are adventitious or technically unavoidable.
Comisia stabileşte nivelurile de prag prevăzute în paragraful anterior.
The Commission shall establish the threshold levels referred to in the previous subparagraph.
Măsurile respective, destinate să modifice elementele neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei, se adoptă în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3).”
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3)."
Articolul 23 alineatul (2) (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Article 23, paragraph 2 (Directive 2001/18/EC)
„(2) O decizie este luată în acest sens în termen de 60 de zile, în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât este destinată modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
A decision shall be taken on the matter within 60 days in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since it is designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Pentru a calcula perioada de 60 de zile, nu se ia în considerare perioada de timp în care Comisia aşteaptă informaţii suplimentare pe care le-a solicitat notificatorului sau aşteaptă avizul comitetului/comitetelor ştiinţific(e) care a/au fost consultat(e).
For the purpose of calculating the 60 day period, any period of time during which the Commission is awaiting further information which it may have requested from the notifier or is seeking the opinion of the Scientific Committee(s) which has/have been consulted shall not be taken into account.
Perioada de timp în care Comisia aşteaptă avizul comitetului/comitetelor ştiinţific(e) consultat(e) nu depăşeşte 60 de zile.
The period of time during which the Commission is awaiting the opinion of the Scientific Committee(s) consulted shall not exceed 60 days.
De asemenea, nu se ia în considerare perioada de timp în care Parlamentul European şi/sau Consiliul acţionează în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control menţionată la articolul 30 alineatul (3).”
Likewise, the period of time the European Parliament and/or the Council take to act in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) shall not be taken into account."
Articolul 26 alineatul (2) (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Article 26, paragraph 2 (Directive 2001/18/EC),
„(2) Condiţiile pentru punerea în aplicare a alineatului (1), fără perpetuarea sau crearea unor neconcordanţe cu dispoziţiile în materie de etichetare, prevăzute de legislaţia comunitară existentă, se stabilesc în conformitate cu procedura prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât ele sunt destinate modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
The conditions for the implementation of paragraph 1 shall, without duplicating or creating inconsistencies with existing labelling provisions laid down in existing Community legislation, be determined in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since they are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Procedând astfel, trebuie să se ţină seama, după caz, de dispoziţiile în materie de etichetare stabilite de statele membre în conformitate cu legislaţia comunitară.”
In doing so, account should be taken, as appropriate, of labelling provisions established by Member States in accordance with Community legislation."
Anexa II partea introductivă alineatul (1) (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Annex II, introductory part, paragraph 1 (Directive 2001/18/EC)
(4a) În anexa II, primul alineat se înlocuieşte cu următorul text:
(4a) In Annex II, the first paragraph is replaced by the following:
„Prezenta anexă descrie, în termeni generali, obiectivul urmărit, elementele care trebuie să fie luate în considerare şi principiile generale şi metodologia de urmat pentru realizarea evaluării riscului ecologic (e.r.e.) menţionate la articolele 4 şi 13.
"This Annex describes in general terms the objective to be achieved, the elements to be considered and the general principles and methodology to be followed to perform the environmental risk assessment (e.r.a.) referred to in Articles 4 and 13.
Acesteia i se adaugă notele orientative care trebuie să fie întocmite în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât ele sunt destinate modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
It will be supplemented by guidance notes to be developed in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since they are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.
Notele orientative respective sunt întocmite până în 17 octombrie 2002.”
These guidance notes shall be completed by 17 October 2002."
ARTICOLUL 1 PUNCTUL 4B (nou)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 B (new)
Anexa IV partea introductivă (Directiva 2001/18/CE)
Annex IV, introductory part (Directive 2001/18/EC)
(4a) În anexa IV, partea introductivă se înlocuieşte cu următorul text:
(4b) In Annex IV, the introductory part is replaced by the following:
„Prezenta anexă descrie în termeni generali informaţiile suplimentare care trebuie să fie furnizate în cazul notificării pentru introducerea pe piaţă şi informaţiile privind cerinţele de etichetare a OMG-urilor ca produse în sine sau componente ale altor produse care urmează să fie introduse pe piaţă şi la OMG-ul exceptat, în temeiul articolului 2 alineatul (4) al doilea paragraf.
"This Annex describes in general terms the additional information to be provided in the case of notification for placing on the market and information for labelling requirements regarding GMOs as or in product to be placed on the market, and GMO exempted under Article2(4), second subparagraph.
Anexa se completează cu note orientative cu privire la, printre altele, descrierea modului în care se intenţionează să se folosească produsul, aceste note urmând să fie elaborate în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control prevăzută la articolul 30 alineatul (3), întrucât ele sunt destinate modificării elementelor neesenţiale ale prezentei directive prin completarea ei.
It will be supplemented by guidance notes, as regards i.a. the description of how the product is intended to be used, to be developed in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 30(3) since they are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it.