natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
28. recunoaşte importanţa capitală a determinării caracteristicilor şi a clasificării pe categorii a riscurilor, inclusiv a stabilirii unui nivel de risc acceptabil la nivel comunitar şi a măsurilor prioritare corespunzătoare reducerii riscurilor; consideră că trebuie depuse eforturi pentru definirea în mod clar a situaţiilor în care riscul apariţiei unor boli atinge niveluri ridicate şi depăşeşte nivelul acceptabil, precum şi pentru determinarea consecinţelor unor astfel de situaţii;
Acknowledges the crucial importance of risk profiling and categorisation, including the determination of an acceptable level of risk for the Community and of the relative priority for action to reduce the risk; believes that efforts must be made to define clearly the situations in which the risk of disease is heightened and exceeds the acceptable level, as well as the consequences thereof;
Pilonul al doilea: cadrul juridic al Uniunii Europene
Pillar 2 – EU legal framework
35 mai mult decât atât, insistă asupra rolului central care ar trebui acordat, în cadrul strategiei, înlocuirii actualei serii de măsuri politice conexe şi interdependente cu un cadru juridic unic, care să ia în considerare în special recomandările, standardele şi orientările stabilite de OIE şi Codex Alimentarius al OMS/FAO, fără a trece cu vederea regulile europene, precum transparenţa şi implicarea tuturor părţilor interesate, evitând, în acelaşi timp, orice deteriorare a stării de sănătate în UE;
35 Stresses, furthermore, that the replacement of the current set of inter-linked and inter-dependent policy measures with a single legal framework that take particular account of the recommendations, standards and guidelines of the OIE and the WHO/FAO Codex Alimentarius, should be a central plank of the strategy, without disregarding European rules such as transparency and the involvement of all stakeholders, while avoiding any deterioration in health status in the EU;
41 invită Comisia să efectueze o analiză comparativă a sistemelor de despăgubiri existente în statele membre şi, pe această bază, să elaboreze un model-cadru la nivelul Uniunii Europene; invită Comisia să elaboreze un cadru juridic în vederea unui sistem eficient de repartizare a costurilor, pentru a garanta contribuţia acestui sector la finanţarea costurilor directe legate de eradicarea unei boli a animalelor;
41 Calls on the Commission to carry out a comparative analysis of existing compensation systems in the Member States and on that basis to draw up an EU-wide framework model; calls on the Commission to create a legal framework for an efficient cost-sharing scheme in the Member States in order to ensure that the direct costs for eradicating an animal disease are also co-financed by the sector;
44. se declară în favoarea includerii în cadrul juridic al Uniunii Europene a unor dispoziţii care să susţină soluţia despăgubirii pierderilor indirecte care nu sunt provocate doar de măsurile de lichidare a focarului de boală; atrage atenţia asupra faptului că, în unele cazuri, pierderile indirecte pot fi mai importante decât cele directe şi ar trebui să se prevadă acordarea unor compensaţii pentru astfel de pierderi; prin urmare, îşi exprimă sprijinul faţă de intensificarea cercetării privind crearea unor instrumente naţionale de asigurare de către crescătorii de animale şi susţinerea acestor instrumente de către Comunitatea Europeană; constată, cu toate acestea, că, în anumite cazuri, asigurările private ar putea constitui un instrument mai eficient de gestionare a unor astfel de pierderi;
Agrees that provision should be made in the EU legal framework for support for the possibility of covering indirect losses not resulting from disease-eradication measures alone; points out that indirect losses can, in some cases, be more severe than direct losses and that provision should therefore be made for compensation for such losses; expresses its support, therefore, for more research into and Community support for the establishment of national insurance instruments by livestock farmers; notes, however, that private insurance might be a more efficient instrument for dealing with such losses in certain cases;
Pilonul al treilea: prevenirea riscurilor legate de sănătatea animală, supravegherea şi pregătirea pentru situaţii de criză
Pillar 3 – Animal-related threat prevention, surveillance and crisis preparedness
Pilonul al patrulea: ştiinţă, inovare şi cercetare
Pillar 4 – Science, Innovation and Research
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru comerŢ internaŢional
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade
privind o nouă Strategie în materie de sănătate animală pentru Uniunea Europeană (2007-2013)
on a new Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007-2013)
Comisia pentru comerț internațional recomandă Comisiei pentru agricultură și dezvoltare rurală, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
PE 402.567v01-00
PE 402.567v03-00
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru afaceri externe .............................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs .................................................14
– având în vedere propunerea Comisiei prezentată Consiliului ( COM(2007)0298 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0298 ),
– având în vedere articolul 63 punctele 3 și 4 din Tratatul CE, în temeiul cărora a fost consultat de către Consiliu ( A6-0148/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 63(3) and (4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0196/2007 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru libertăți civile, justiție și afaceri interne și avizul Comisiei pentru afaceri externe (A6-0000/2008),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and to the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0148/2008 ),
Propunere de directivă - act de modificare
Proposal for a directive – amending act
(5) Având în vedere dreptul beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale de a locui în alt stat membru decât în cel care le-a acordat protecție internațională, e necesară asigurarea faptului că statele membre în cauză sunt informate de protecția de fond a persoanelor respective, astfel încât să își poată îndeplini obligațiile privind respectarea principiului nereturnării.
(5) In view of the right of beneficiaries of international protection to reside in other Member States than the one which granted them international protection, it is necessary to ensure that these Member States are informed of the protection background of the persons concerned, so that they can comply with their obligations regarding the respect of the principle of non-refoulement.
În acest scop, permisul de ședere CE al rezidentului pe termen lung acordat beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale trebuie să conțină o mențiune care să indice faptul că un stat membru a acordat protecție internațională deținătorului permisului.
For this purpose the long-term resident’s EC residence permit granted to beneficiaries of international protection should contain a remark providing information about the fact that international protection was granted by a Member State to its holder.
În cazul în care protecția internațională nu a fost retrasă, această mențiune trebuie reluată în permisul de ședere CE al rezidentului pe termen lung eliberat de al doilea stat membru.
Provided that international protection has not been withdrawn, this remark should be reproduced in the long-term resident’s EC residence permit issued by the second Member State.
Cu toate acestea, al doilea stat membru nu poate utiliza, direct sau indirect, această mențiune ca pretext pentru a refuza acordarea statutului de rezident pe termen lung pe teritoriul său.
However, the second Member State may not use this remark as a pretext, whether directly or indirectly, to refuse to grant long-term residence in its territory.
(10a) În conformitate cu dispozițiile prezentei Directive, acordarea statutului de rezident pe termen lung
(10a) Under the terms of this Directive the granting of long term residence status
nu ar trebui să implice revocarea sau retragerea drepturilor pe care le au refugiații, beneficiarii de protecție subsidiară și membrii familiilor lor conform Directivei 2004/83/CE;
should not imply the revocation or withdrawal of the rights held by refugees, beneficiaries of subsidiary protection, and members of their family under Directive 2004/83/EC;
Propunere de directivă – act de modificare
Proposal for a directive – amending act
Articolul 1 – punctul 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
La articolul 2 , litera ( f ) se înlocuiește cu următorul text :
In Article 2, point (f) is replaced by the following :
La articolul 2 se adaugă litera ( fa ) următoare :
In Article 2, the following point (f a ) is added :
„( f ) «protecție internațională» reprezintă protecția internațională astfel cum este definită aceasta la articolul 2 litera (a) din Directiva 2003/83/CE a Consiliului;”»
‘( f ) “international protection” means international protection as defined in Article 2(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;’
„( fa ) «protecție internațională» reprezintă protecția internațională astfel cum este definită aceasta la articolul 2 litera (a) din Directiva 2003/83/CE a Consiliului;”»
‘( fa ) “international protection” means international protection as defined in Article 2(a) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC;’
Articolul 1 – punctul 3
Article 1 – paragraph 3
„În cazul beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale, perioada dintre data introducerii cererii pentru protecție internațională și data la care se acordă permisul de ședere la care se referă articolul 24 din Directiva 2004/83/CE trebuie luată în considerare la calculul perioadei prevăzute de alineatul (1).”
‘Regarding beneficiaries of international protection, the period between the date on which the application for international protection is lodged and the date on which the residence permit referred to in Article 24 of Directive 2004/83/EC is granted shall be taken into account in the calculation of the period referred to in paragraph 1.’
„În cazul beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale, perioada dintre data depunerii unei prime cereri de protecție internațională , inclusiv atunci când respectiva cerere este o cerere de protecție temporară, dacă aceasta precedă accesul la protecția internațională, și data la care se acordă permisul de ședere la care se referă articolul 24 din Directiva 2004/83/CE , trebuie luată în considerare la calculul perioadei prevăzute de alineatul (1).”
‘Regarding beneficiaries of international protection, the period between the date on which the first application for international protection is lodged , including where this first application is an application for temporary protection where the latter precedes access to international protection, and the date on which the residence permit referred to in Article 24 of Directive 2004/83/EC is granted shall be taken into account in the calculation of the period referred to in paragraph 1.’
Articolul 1 – punctul 3a (nou)
Article 1 - point 3 a (new)
Directiva 2003/109/CE
Directive 2003/109/EC
Articolul – 5 alineatul 1 – paragraful 1a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
„Aceste cerințe nu se aplică beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale care nu au acces la un loc de muncă.”
‘Such requirement shall not apply to beneficiaries of international protection who do not have access to employment.’.
Articolul 1 – punctul 3b (nou)
Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new)
Articolul 5 – alineatul 2 – paragraful 1a
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
La articolul 5 alineatul (2) se adaugă următorul paragraf:
In Article 5(2), the following subparagraph shall be added:
„Condițiile de integrare naționale nu pot fi impuse beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale decât în urma unei examinări individuale, ținând cont de situația lor deosebit de vulnerabilă, printr-o decizie motivată, în conformitate cu articolul 33 din Directiva 2004/83/CE.”
‘National integration conditions may be applied to beneficiaries of international protection, by a reasoned decision in accordance with Article 33 of Directive 2004/83/EC, only after individual consideration of their case, bearing in mind their particularly vulnerable situation.’
Articolul 1 – punctul 6
Article 1 – paragraph 6
Articolul 12 – alineatul 3a
Article 12 – paragraph 3 a
„(3a) În cazul în care un stat membru decide să expulzeze un rezident pe termen lung al cărui permis de ședere pe termen lung CE conține mențiunea prevăzută de articolul 8 alineatul (4), acesta contactează statul membru care a acordat protecția internațională, pentru a-i confirma statutul de rezident pe termen lung .
Where a Member State decides to expel a long-term resident whose long-term resident’s EC residence permit contains the remark referred to in Article 8(4), it shall contact the Member State that granted international protection in order to confirm the status of long-term resident .
Statul membru care a acordat protecția internațională trebuie să răspundă în scris statului solicitant, în termen de maximum o lună.
The Member State that granted international protection must respond in writing to the Member State that made the request within a maximum of one month.
Decizia de expulzare nu poate fi luată decât după răspunsul statului membru care a acordat protecția internațională.
The decision to expel the long-term resident may not be taken until the response of the Member State that granted international protection has been received.
Cu excepția cazului în care protecția internațională a fost între timp retrasă, rezidentul pe termen lung este expulzat către statul membru respectiv, care îl readmite, precum și pe membrii familiei sale, imediat și fără formalități.”
Unless in the meantime international protection has been withdrawn, the long-term resident shall be expelled to this Member State, which shall immediately readmit without formalities the long-term resident and his/her family members.’
Cu excepția cazului în care protecția internațională a fost între timp retrasă, cu respectarea principiului nereturnării, rezidentul pe termen lung nu poate fi expulzat decât către statul membru respectiv, care îl readmite, împreună cu membrii familiei sale, imediat și fără formalități.”
Unless in the meantime international protection has been withdrawn, the long ‑term resident may, in accordance with the principle of non-refoulement, only be expelled to this Member State, which shall immediately readmit without formalities the long-term resident and his/her family members .’
Articolul 1 – punctul 8
Article 1 – paragraph 8
Articolul 25 – paragraful 1a (nou)
Article 25 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Comisia stabilește lista punctelor de contact, o actualizează regulat și o transmite statelor membre.
The Commission shall draw up a list of contact points, update it regularly and forward it to the Member States.
The aim of the proposal is to offer refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (hereinafter referred to as “beneficiaries of international protection”) legal certainty about their residence in a Member State and rights which are comparable to those of EU nationals after 5 years of legal residence, thus closing a gap left open by Directive 2004/83/EC.
The aim of the proposal is to offer refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection (hereinafter referred to as ‘beneficiaries of international protection’) legal certainty about their residence in a Member State and rights which are comparable to those of EU nationals after 5 years of legal residence, thus closing a gap left open by Directive 2004/83/EC.
This is done by deleting the exceptions to the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC concerning beneficiaries of international protection, while taking into account, where necessary, their specific position as compared to other third-country nationals.
This is done by deleting the exceptions to the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC concerning beneficiaries of international protection, while taking into account, where necessary, their specific position as compared to other third-country nationals.
Beneficiaries of international protection are currently not entitled to long-term resident status under Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.
Beneficiaries of international protection are currently not entitled to long-term resident status under Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents.
The proposal states that the prospect of obtaining long-term residence status in a Member State after a certain time is an important element for the full integration of beneficiaries of international protection in the Member States of residence.
The proposal states that the prospect of obtaining long-term residence status in a Member State after a certain time is an important element for the full integration of beneficiaries of international protection in the Member States of residence.
This proposal which aims to amend Directive 2003/109/EC can be considered as a tool for integrating third-country nationals, who are beneficiaries of international protection, in the host Member State and is therefore a matter of immigration policy.
This proposal which aims to amend Directive 2003/109/EC can be considered as a tool for integrating third-country nationals, who are beneficiaries of international protection, in the host Member State and is therefore a matter of immigration policy.
The proposal includes four key elements:
The proposal includes four key elements:
a) It allows beneficiaries of international protection to acquire long-term resident status in the Member State which has granted them protection subject to the same conditions as other third-county nationals.
a) It allows beneficiaries of international protection to acquire long-term resident status in the Member State which has granted them protection subject to the same conditions as other third-county nationals.
b) It sets out the conditions under which long-term residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, may exercise their right of residence in another Member State.
b) It sets out the conditions under which long-term residents, including beneficiaries of international protection, may exercise their right of residence in another Member State.
c) It does not include a mechanism for transfer of responsibility for protection under community law
c) It does not include a mechanism for transfer of responsibility for protection under community law
Requests for transfer of responsibility for protection remain governed by the 1951 Geneva convention and by the European Agreement on transfer of responsibility for refugees concluded in the framework of the Council of Europe, where applicable. .
Requests for transfer of responsibility for protection remain governed by the 1951 Geneva convention and by the European Agreement on transfer of responsibility for refugees concluded in the framework of the Council of Europe, where applicable. .
d) It ensures the respect of the principle of 'non-refoulement', in cases where a beneficiary of international protection, who has already obtained long-term resident status in a Member State, is also granted long-term residence status in another Member State after having resided there for 5 years.
d) It ensures the respect of the principle of ‘non-refoulement’, in cases where a beneficiary of international protection, who has already obtained long-term resident status in a Member State, is also granted long-term residence status in another Member State after having resided there for 5 years.
In the light of the above, your rapporteur:
In the light of the above, your rapporteur:
a) Supports the European Commission’s initiative to close the gap, resulting from the exclusion of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection from the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC.
a) Supports the European Commission’s initiative to close the gap, resulting from the exclusion of refugees and beneficiaries of international protection from the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC.
b) Considers that the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC to both refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection is important with regard to the respect of the equal treatment of people benefiting from international protection; underlines that excluding persons benefiting from subsidiary protection from the scope of the proposal will result in a more complicated legal framework that will markedly reduce the benefits expected from the proposed Directive.
b) Considers that the extension of the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC to both refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection is important with regard to the respect of the equal treatment of people benefiting from international protection; underlines that excluding persons benefiting from subsidiary protection from the scope of the proposal will result in a more complicated legal framework that will markedly reduce the benefits expected from the proposed Directive.
c) Supports the inclusion of the period between the date on which the application for international protection is lodged and the date on which the residence permit is granted in the calculation of the five year residence duration necessary for applying for long-term resident status.
c) Supports the inclusion of the period between the date on which the application for international protection is lodged and the date on which the residence permit is granted in the calculation of the five year residence duration necessary for applying for long-term resident status.
Comisia pentru afaceri externe recomandă Comisiei pentru libertăți civile, justiție și afaceri interne, competentă în fond, să includă în raportul său următoarele amendamente:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(10a) În temeiul prezentei directive, acordarea statutului de rezident pe termen lung nu implică revocarea sau retragerea drepturilor refugiaților sau ale beneficiarilor unei protecții internaționale obținute în temeiul Directivei 2004/83/CE;
(10a) Under the terms of this Directive the granting of long-term residence status should not imply the revocation or withdrawal of the rights of refugees or subjects of international protection acquired under Directive 2004/83/EC;
Extinderea domeniului de aplicare al Directivei 2003/109/CE la beneficiarii unei protecții internaționale
Extension of the scope of Directive 2003/109/EC to beneficiaries of international protection
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Cristian Silviu Bușoi, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Jaromír Kohlíček, Erik Meijer, Nickolay Mladenov, Józef Pinior, Inger Segelström, Marcello Vernola
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Jaromír Kohlíček, Erik Meijer, Nickolay Mladenov, Józef Pinior, Inger Segelström, Marcello Vernola