natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is also a definition of the responsibilities for the Commission, the Council and the Member States as far as the costs and management of the installation and its operation are concerned.
It also sets out the responsibilities of the Commission, the Council and the Member States as regards the costs and management of the installation and the operation thereof.
The rapporteur regrets, once more, all the delays registered with the start of operations of the SIS II that produces continuously negative consequences.
The rapporteur regrets, once more, all the delays to the start of SIS II operations which continue to cause problems.
Nevertheless, he is well aware of the need to find a solution to this problem that can put the existence of the Schengen area at risk.
Nevertheless, he is well aware of the need to find a solution to this problem, which may jeopardise the very existence of the Schengen area.
The current framework of the SIS 1 + (or even the SISone 4all) is under the exclusive responsibility of the Council and the Member States.
The current SIS I+ framework (or even the SISone4all framework) is something for which the Council and the Member States have sole responsibility.
For that reason, he wishes that the call for tender launched by the Deputy Secretary-General of the Council is able to find the most desirable result, with the conclusion, on time, of a contract that will be funded jointly by the Member States participating in the SIS 1 + and later on in the SIS one4all.
Hence he hopes that the call for tender launched by the Deputy Secretary-General of the Council will bring about the most desirable result, with the conclusion in good time of a contract funded jointly by the Member States participating in the SIS 1+ and later in SISone4all.
The fallback solution that is envisaged in these proposals - the installation by the Commission of a new communication infrastructure for SIS 1+ via a specific contract with the s-TESTA provider to be funded by the general budget of the EU- presents very high risks in terms of delays on the legal and technical front and in terms of ambiguity of decision making.
The fall-back solution envisaged in these proposals - the installation by the Commission of a new communication infrastructure for SIS 1+ via a specific contract with the s-TESTA provider, to be funded out of the EU general budget - presents very high risks in terms of delays on the legal and technical front and in terms of ambiguity in decision-making.
The European Parliament has always pointed out that the starting of operations of the SIS II, already in the community framework, is an absolute priority.
The European Parliament has always made it clear that the launch of SIS II operations within the Community framework is an absolute priority.
In that respect, it is highly regrettable that the creation and implementation of this new network will divert human and financial resources from the SIS II, both at European level and in the Member States.
Hence it is highly regrettable that the creation and implementation of the new network will ultimately divert human and financial resources from SIS II, both at European level and in the Member States.
In fact, the resources will be necessary to manage in parallel three different projects:
In fact, resources will be needed for the purpose of managing three different projects simultaneously:
- Installation, operation and management of a new Communication Infrastructure.
- the installation, operation and management of a new Communication Infrastructure.
This will have a negative impact on the migration to SIS II and result in more delays on the implementation of the SIS II project.
This will have a detrimental effect on the migration to SIS II and result in more delays in the implementation of the SIS II project.
Furthermore, the economic impact is also very negative because the costs are too high for a temporary solution (one year) presented in the legislative proposals at stake.
Furthermore, the economic impact is also extremely serious, since the costs are too high for the temporary solution (one year) presented to us in the legislative proposals.
The costs of this new network will be funded on the general budget of the European Union and they are clearly disproportionate with respect to the objectives.
The costs of the new network will be met out of the EU general budget and they are clearly disproportionate to the objectives.
There is also not a clear definition of responsibilities, basically what remains in the hands of the Council and the Member States and to what extent the Commission is taking responsibility in the matter.
Nor is there a clear definition of responsibilities (basically, which responsibilities lie with the Council and which with the Member States, and to what extent the Commission is taking responsibility in the matter).
The rapporteur considers the option of creating this new network as a bad one because of the very negative consequences explained above.
The rapporteur considers the option of creating a new network to be a bad one on account of the very damaging effects explained above.
Nevertheless, in the current state of play, it is important to note that in case the tender procedure fails, the Commission's proposal at stake seems to be the only remaining solution addressing the problem of a possible unavailability of the communication network for the operations of the SIS and related SIRENE exchange, that would then necessarily result in the reintroduction of internal border controls.
Nevertheless, as things stand at present, it is important to note that if the tender procedure fails, the Commission's proposal seems to be the only remaining solution to the problem of the possible unavailability of the communications network for SIS operations and related SIRENE additional information exchanges, which would necessarily result in the reintroduction of internal border controls.
The current SISNET network also includes VISION, i. e. the network supporting VISA consultation procedure between central authorities of Member STATES.
The current SISNET network also includes the VISION network, i.e. the network supporting the consultation procedures between the Member States' central authorities for the granting of visas.
If the solution is to renew the SISNET contract, the VISION should remain there at least for one more year.
If the final decision taken is to renew the SISNET contract, the VISION network should continue to operate in its field for at least another year.
On the contrary, if the final decision is to create this new network, than the problem appears already now, because there will be a gap in the system with the absence of VISION.
On the other hand, if the final decision is to create a new network then the problem already arises, since there will be a gap in the system with the absence of VISION.
It is foreseen that by 2012, VISION should be integrated in the VIS (the implementation of the Visa Information System will replace all Schengen consultation on visas).
It is expected that, in 2012, VISION will be incorporated into VIS (the implementation of the Visa Information System which will replace all Schengen consultation on visas).
However, until then, a solution has to be found meaning that the s-TESTA network will have to take VISION on board and the Commission has to take implementing powers in the matter (that are now of the Council).
By then, however, a solution will have to be found, involving the incorporation of VISION into the s-TESTA network and the assumption by the Commission of implementing powers in this area (powers which currently lie with the Council).
The rapporteur has finally decided to present some amendments in order to reinforce the role of the European Parliament in the whole process.
Lastly, the rapporteur has also decided to table some amendments with a view to strengthening the role of the European Parliament in the whole process.
Infrastructura de comunicaţii pentru mediul Sistemului de informaţii Schengen (SIS) (regulament)
Communication infrastructure for the Schengen Information System (SIS) environment (regulation)
referitoare la propunerea de regulament al Parlamentului European şi al Consiliului privind introducerea pe piaţă a produselor fitosanitare
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market
Anja Weisgerber , Comisia pentru piaţa internă şi protecţia consumatorilor
Anja Weisgerber , Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Kyösti Virrankoski , Comisia pentru agricultură şi dezvoltare rurală
Kyösti Virrankoski , Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
PE 388.326v01-00
PE 388.326v02-00
EXPUNERE DE MOTIVE......................................................................................................136
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................131
AVIZ AL COMISIEI PENTRU AFACERI JURIDICE PRIVIND TEMEIUL JURIDIC.........140
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...........134
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru industrie, cercetare şi energie ...........................152
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .............146
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru piaţa internă şi protecţia consumatorilor .173
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (*) 166
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru agricultură şi dezvoltare rurală ...................211
OPINION of the COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (*) 203
– având în vedere propunerea Comisiei înaintată Parlamentului European şi Consiliului ( COM(2006)0388 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0388 )
– având în vedere articolul 251 alineatul (2), articolul 37 alineatul (2) şi articolul 152 alineatul (4) litera (b) din Tratatul CE, în temeiul cărora propunerea a fost prezentată de către Comisie ( C6-0245/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 37(2) and 152(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0245/2006 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru mediu, sănătate publică şi siguranţă alimentară şi avizele Comisiei pentru industrie, cercetare şi energie, cel al Comisiei pentru piaţa internă şi protecţia consumatorilor, precum şi cel al Comisiei pentru agricultură şi dezvoltare rurală ( A6-0359/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0359/2007 ),
având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunităţii Europene, în special articolul 37 alineatul (2) şi articolul 152 alineatul (4) litera (b),
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 37 (2) and 152 (4)(b) thereof,
având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunităţii Europene, în special articolul 152 alineatul (4) litera (b) şi articolul 175 alineatul (1) ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 152 (4)(b) and 175 (1) thereof,
(4) În scopul simplificării, noul act abrogă, de asemenea, şi Directiva 79/117/ EEC a Consiliului din 21 decembrie 1978 privind interzicerea introducerii pe piaţă a unor produse fitosanitare conţinând anumite substanţe active.
(4) By way of simplification, the new act should also repeal Council Directive 79/117/EEC of 21 December 1978 prohibiting the placing on the market and use of plant protection products containing certain active substances.
(4) În scopul simplificării, noul act abrogă, de asemenea, şi Directiva 79/117/ CEE a Consiliului din 21 decembrie 1978 privind interzicerea introducerii pe piaţă a unor produse fitosanitare conţinând anumite substanţe active.
(4) By way of simplification, the new act should also repeal Council Directive 79/117/EEC of 21 December 1978 prohibiting the placing on the market and use of plant protection products containing certain active substances.
Cu toate acestea, principiile de bază ale Directivei 79/117/CEE ar trebui păstrate în prezentul regulament.
However, the main principles of Directive 79/117/EEC should be maintained in this Regulation.
(6a) În cadrul Comunităţii, diferite tipuri de culturi prezintă o utilitate atât pentru producţia la scară largă, cât şi pentru cea la scară redusă.
(6a) Various types of crop are of significance in the Community for both large-scale and small-scale production.
Diversitatea acestor tipuri de culturi trebuie să fie protejată prin autorizarea folosirii unei game de produse fitosanitare.
These various types of production should be protected by allowing the use of different plant protection products.
(7) Produsele fitosanitare pot să aibă şi efecte negative asupra producţiei vegetale.
(7) Plant protection products can also have non-beneficial effects on plant production.
Utilizarea lor poate implica riscuri şi pericole pentru om, animale şi mediu, mai ales dacă sunt introduse pe piaţă fără să fi fost testate şi autorizate oficial şi dacă sunt utilizate incorect.
Their use may involve risks and hazards for humans, animals and the environment, especially if placed on the market without having been officially tested and authorised and if incorrectly used.
În consecinţă, se impune adoptarea unor norme unitare privind introducerea pe piaţă a produselor fitosanitare .
Therefore, harmonised rules should be adopted on the placing on the market of plant protection products .
(7) Pesticidele pot să aibă şi efecte negative asupra producţiei vegetale.
(7) Pesticides can also have non-beneficial effects on plant production.
Utilizarea lor poate implica riscuri , pericole şi efecte negative pe termen scurt şi pe termen lung pentru om, animale şi mediu, şi nu numai, dacă sunt introduse pe piaţă fără să fi fost testate şi autorizate oficial şi dacă sunt utilizate incorect.
Their use may involve harm, risks , intrinsic hazards and short and long-term adverse impacts for humans, animals and the environment, especially , but not only , if placed on the market without having been officially tested and authorised and if incorrectly used.
În consecinţă, se impune adoptarea unor norme unitare privind introducerea pe piaţă a pesticidelor .
Therefore, harmonised rules should be adopted on the placing of pesticides on the market.
(Prezentul amendament se aplică întregului text legislativ.
(This amendment applies to the whole legislative text.
Se va utiliza termenul „pesticide” în întregul text adoptat, inclusiv în titlu.)
The term "pesticides" will be used throughout the adopted text, including the title.)
(8) Scopul prezentului regulament este acela de a asigura un grad ridicat de protecţie , atât pentru sănătatea omului, cât şi pentru aceea a animalelor, precum şi un grad ridicat de protecţie a mediului.
(8) The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment.
O atenţie deosebită trebuie să se acorde protecţiei grupurilor de populaţie vulnerabile, inclusiv femeilor însărcinate, sugarilor şi copiilor.
Particular attention should be paid to the protection of vulnerable groups of the population, including pregnant women, infants and children.
Este necesară aplicarea principiului prudenţei şi, în virtutea acestuia, industria trebuie să dovedească faptul că produsele fabricate şi introduse pe piaţă nu afectează în mod negativ sănătatea omului sau mediul.
The precautionary principle should be applied and ensure that industry demonstrates that substances or products produced or placed on the market do not adversely affect human health or the environment.
(8) Scopul prezentului regulament este de a asigura un nivel ridicat de protecţie a sănătăţii omului, a animalelor şi a mediului şi, de asemenea, de a asigura competitivitatea agriculturii europene .
(8) The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment , and at the same time to ensure the competitiveness of European agriculture .
O atenţie deosebită trebuie să se acorde protecţiei grupurilor de populaţie vulnerabile, inclusiv femeilor însărcinate şi celor care alăptează, embrionilor şi fetuşilor , sugarilor şi copiilor.
Particular attention should be paid to the protection of vulnerable groups of the population, including pregnant and nursing women, embryos and foetuses, infants and children.
Este necesară aplicarea principiului prudenţei şi, în virtutea acestuia, industria trebuie să dovedească faptul că produsele fabricate şi introduse pe piaţă nu afectează în mod negativ sănătatea omului sau mediul şi nici nu sunt susceptibile de acest lucru .
The precautionary principle should be applied and ensure that industry demonstrates that substances or products produced or placed on the market do not adversely affect human health or the environment and are not suspected of doing so .
(8a) Pentru a evita testarea pe animale, testarea pe animale vertebrate în sensul prezentului regulament ar trebui efectuată doar în ultimă instanţă.
(8a) In order to avoid animal testing, testing on vertebrate animals for the purposes of this Regulation should be undertaken only as a last resort.
Prezentul regulament şi legislaţia care stabileşte cerinţe documentare pentru substanţele active, produsele fitosanitare, agenţii fitoprotectori sau sinergici ar trebui să garanteze că testarea pe animale vertebrate este redusă la minim şi că dubla testare este evitată şi să promoveze utilizarea unor metode de testare care să nu implice animale şi a unor strategii de testare inteligente.
This Regulation, and the legislation establishing data requirements for active substances, plant protection products, safeners and synergists, should ensure that testing on vertebrate animals is minimised and that double-testing is avoided, and promote the use of non-animal test methods and intelligent testing strategies.
Rezultatele existente ale testelor pe animale vertebrate trebuie să fie împărtăşite, în vederea creării de noi produse fitosanitare.
Existing results from tests on vertebrate animals must be shared in the process of developing new plant protection products.
În conformitate cu dispoziţiile Directivei 86/609/CEE a Consiliului din 24 noiembrie 1986 privind apropierea actelor cu putere de lege şi actelor administrative ale statelor membre referitoare la protecţia animalelor utilizate în scopuri experimentale sau ştiinţifice, testele pe animale vertebrate trebuie, de asemenea, să fie înlocuite, limitate sau îmbunătăţite.
In accordance with Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes 1 , tests on vertebrate animals must also be replaced, restricted or refined.
Punerea în aplicare a prezentului regulament trebuie să se bazeze, ori de câte ori este posibil, pe utilizarea unor metode de testare alternative corespunzătoare.
Implementation of this Regulation must where possible be based on the use of appropriate alternative testing methods.
Până cel târziu la data de …*, Comisia trebuie să revizuiască normele privind protecţia datelor referitoare la rezultatele testelor pe animale vertebrate şi, dacă este cazul, să le modifice.
Not later than ...*, the Commission must review the rules on the data protection of results from tests on vertebrate animals and where necessary change those rules .
*JO L 358, 18.12.1986, p.
1 OJ L 358, 18.12.1986, p.
Directivă astfel cum a fost modificată prin Directiva 2003/65/CE a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului (JO L 230, 16.9.2003, p.
Directive as amended by Directive 2003/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 230, 16.9.2003, p.
Şapte ani de la intrarea în vigoare a prezentului regulament.
Seven years after the entry into force of this Regulation.
(9) În compoziţia produselor fitosanitare trebuie incluse numai substanţele cu utilitate demonstrată pentru producţia vegetală şi care nu exercită efecte nocive previzibile asupra sănătăţii omului sau a animalelor sau nu afectează în mod inacceptabil mediul.
(9) Substances should only be included in plant protection products where it has been demonstrated that they present a clear benefit for plant production and they are not expected to have any harmful effect on human or animal health or any unacceptable influence on the environment.
Pentru a obţine acelaşi nivel de protecţie în toate statele membre, decizia cu privire la acceptabilitatea sau inacceptabilitatea acestor substanţe trebuie să fie luată la nivel comunitar.
In order to achieve the same level of protection in all Member States, the decision on acceptability or non-acceptability of such substances should be taken at Community level.
(9) În compoziţia produselor fitosanitare trebuie incluse numai substanţele cu utilitate demonstrată pentru producţia vegetală şi în privinţa cărora s-a stabilit că nu vor exercita efecte nocive previzibile asupra sănătăţii omului sau a animalelor sau nu afectează în mod inacceptabil mediul.
(9) Substances should only be included in plant protection products where it has been demonstrated that they present a clear benefit for plant production and it has been established that they will not have any harmful effect on human or animal health or any unacceptable influence on the environment.
Pentru a obţine un nivel înalt şi identic de protecţie în toate statele membre, decizia cu privire la acceptabilitatea sau inacceptabilitatea acestor substanţe trebuie să fie luată la nivel comunitar.
In order to achieve a high and identical level of protection in all Member States, the decision on acceptability or non-acceptability of such substances should be taken at Community level.
(9a) În vederea aplicării principiului „poluatorul plăteşte”, Comisia ar trebui să analizeze modalitatea de implicare activă a producătorilor de produse fitosanitare sau de substanţe active conţinute de acestea în gestionarea sau repararea efectelor dăunătoare asupra sănătăţii umane sau asupra mediului, ca rezultat al utilizării acestor produse.
(9a) To apply the 'polluter pays' principle, the Commission should examine how manufacturers of plant protection products or of the active substances they contain should be appropriately involved in dealing with or rectifying harm to human health or to the environment which may result from the use of plant protection products.
(11a) Elaborarea metodelor de testare in vitro ce utilizează organisme de origine non-animală ar trebui promovată, în vederea obţinerii mai multor informaţii relevante pentru siguranţa umană decât cele furnizate de experimentele efectuate în prezent pe animale.
(11a) The development of non-animal in vitro (test tube) test methods should be promoted in order to produce safety data more relevant to humans than results of animal studies currently in use.
(13) Pentru garantarea siguranţei, perioada pentru care se emit aprobări în cazul substanţelor active trebuie să fie limitată în timp.
(13) In the interest of safety, the approval period for active substances should be limited in time.
Perioada de valabilitate a aprobării trebuie să fie proporţională cu eventualele riscuri inerente utilizării unor astfel de substanţe.
The approval period should be proportional to the possible risks inherent in the use of such substances.
Toate deciziile privind reînnoirea aprobării trebuie luate ţinând cont de experienţa acumulată prin utilizarea efectivă a produselor fitosanitare conţinând substanţele în cauză, precum şi de toate progresele ştiinţifice şi tehnice.
Experience gained from the actual use of plant protection products containing the substances concerned and any developments in science and technology should be taken into account when any decision regarding the renewal of an approval is taken.