natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Statele membre prezintă un raport actualizat al progreselor estimate înainte de 1 iulie 2016 și ulterior la fiecare doi ani .
Member States shall submit an update of their projected progress before 1 July 2016 and for every two subsequent years .
Comisia evaluează impactul politicilor sectoriale ale UE asupra emisiilor comunitare de gaze cu efect de seră, precum și potențialul de reducere a emisiilor asociat acestor politici.
The Commission shall assess the impact of EU sectoral policies on the Community's greenhouse gas emissions and the emissions reduction potential relating to these policies.
(2a) Formatul standard al raportului privind emisiile de gaze cu efect de seră, care rezultă din punerea în aplicare a articolului 3, utilizarea creditelor în conformitate cu articolul 4 și aplicarea articolului 4a, se stabilește în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control menționată la articolul 9.
The standard format for reporting of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the implementation of Article 3, the use of credits in accordance with Article 4 and the implementation of Article 4a shall be laid down in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 9.
- limitele emisiilor de gaze cu efect de seră ale fiecărui stat membru, stabilite pentru 2020, față de nivelurile emisiilor de gaze cu efect de seră din 1990; precum și
- each Member State's greenhouse gas emission limits by 2020 compared to 1990 greenhouse gas emission levels; and
În special, raportul include:
In particular, the report shall include:
(a) rezultatele examinării menționate la articolul 4 alineatul (5) din Directiva 2006/32/CE pentru a se stabili dacă este oportună o directivă privind certificatele albe.
a ) the results of the examination referred to in Article 4(5) of Directive 2006/32/EC on whether a directive on white certificates is appropriate.
În special, acest raport prezintă potențialul introducerii unui sistem comunitar obligatoriu de comercializare a certificatelor albe;
I n particular this report shall set out the potential for a mandatory, Community-wide white certificates trading scheme;
(b) propuneri detaliate de reducere a emisiilor în gospodării și sedii comerciale, prin standarde îmbunătățite pentru produse și clădiri, cu scopul de a se garanta că toate gospodăriile și sediile comerciale noi nu au emisii de carbon până în 2020.
b ) detailed proposals for reducing emissions from homes and commercial buildings by means of enhanced product and building standards, with the aim of ensuring that all new homes and commercial premises are 'zero carbon' by 2020;
Raportările la timp sunt esențiale pentru a permite Comisiei să stabilească dacă statele membre își respectă obiectivele și să aplice măsurile necesare în caz de încălcare a acestora.
Timely reporting is essential for the Commission to be able to evaluate whether Member States are in compliance with their targets and to introduce the necessary measures in case of non-compliance.
Mecanismul de control
Compliance Mechanism
(2) În plus față de alineatul (1), volumul total care depășește limita în tone de echivalent CO 2 este dedus din cantitatea ulterioară de cote licitate de un stat membru în conformitate cu articolul 10 alineatul (2) din Directiva 2003/87/CE.
In addition to paragraph 1, the total by which the limit in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent is exceeded shall be deducted from the subsequent quantity of allowances auctioned by th at Member State pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC.
Pentru a menține limita ETS UE intactă, aceste cote sunt licitate de Comisie, iar veniturile astfel obținute sunt vărsate în fondul menționat la alineatul (1).
In order to keep the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) cap intact, these allowances shall be auctioned by the Commission and the revenues shall go into the fund referred to in paragraph 1.
Pentru a menține limita ETS UE intactă, aceste cote sunt licitate de Comisie.
In order to keep the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) cap intact, these allowances shall be auctioned by the Commission.
(4) Comisia adoptă măsurile de creare a fondului comunitar menționat la alineatul (1) și a mecanismelor menționate la alineatul (3).
The Commission shall adopt measures to establish the Community fund referred to in paragraph 1 and the mechanisms referred to in paragraph 3.
Respectivele măsuri, destinate să modifice elemente neesențiale ale prezentei decizii prin completarea acesteia, se adoptă în conformitate cu procedura de reglementare cu control menționată la articolul 9 alineatul (2).
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Decision by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 9(2).
Un mecanism de control strict și eficient este esențial, în special dacă se permite comerțul cu cote între statele membre.
A strong and efficient compliance mechanism is crucial, especially if trade between Member States is allowed.
Cooperarea între autorități
Cooperation between authorities
Deoarece angajamentul asumat de Comunitate impune sarcini nu numai pentru guvernele centrale ale statelor membre, ci și pentru administrațiile lor locale și regionale, precum și pentru alte foruri și organizații militante locale și regionale, statele membre garantează cooperarea dintre autoritățile lor centrale și cele locale la diferite niveluri.
Since the commitment entered into by the Community imposes tasks not only on the central governments of Member States but also on their local and regional governments and on other local and regional advocacy forums and organisations, Member States shall ensure cooperation between their central authorities and local authorities at different levels.
Articolul 5c
Arti cle 5 c
Surse regenerabile de energie:
Renewable energy sources
Dat fiind ca producția sporită de electricitate generată pe baza surselor de energie regenerabile reprezintă o modalitate deosebit de importantă de reducere a emisiilor de gaze cu efect de seră,statele membre se asigură că producerea de energie din surse regenerabile este atractivă din punct de vedere economic, încurajând astfel actorii de pe piață să acorde un ajutor decisiv, prin sporirea producției de electricitate din surse regenerabile, statelor membre în respectarea obligațiilor lor.
Since increasing electricity generation from renewable energy sources is a particularly important means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, Member States shall make energy production from renewable sources economically attractive, thus encouraging market participants, by increasing electricity generation from renewable energy sources , to make a decisive contribution to Member States' compliance with their obligations.
Articolul 5d (nou)
Article 5 d (new)
Articolul 5d
Article 5 d
Implicarea actorilor de pe piață
Involvement of market actors
Pe lângă fiecare stat membru, administrație centrală și locală, organizație și autoritate locală și regională, sunt implicați și contribuie la punerea în aplicare a angajamentului Comunității și actori de pe piață, împreună cu gospodării și consumatori individuali, indiferent de nivelul emisiilor de gaze cu efect de seră care le poate fi atribuit.
In addition to individual Member States, central governments and local and regional organisations and authorities, market actors – together with households and individual consumers – shall be involved in contributing to the implementation of the Community's commitment, irrespective of the level of greenhouse gas emissions which can be attributed to them.
Articolul 5e (nou)
Article 5 e (new)
Articolul 5e
Article 5 e
Finanțarea tehnicilor inovatoare
Funding for innovative techniques
Statele membre asigură fonduri pentru utilizarea de tehnici noi și inovatoare pentru a permite operatorilor industriali să creeze noi locuri de muncă, sporind astfel competitivitatea și promovând realizarea obiectivelor stabilite prin Strategia de la Lisabona.
Member States shall ensure funding for the use of new, innovative techniques in order to enable industrial operators to create new jobs, thereby increasing competitiveness and promoting the achievement of the objectives set by the Lisbon Strategy.
Articolul 6 – alineatul 5 – paragraful 1
Article 6 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
(2) Atunci când se face trimitere la prezentul alineat, se aplică articolul 5a alineatele (1)-(4) și articolul 7 din Decizia 1999/468/CE, cu respectarea dispozițiilor articolului 8 din respectiva decizie.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5a(1) to (4) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Alinierea dispoziției la o modalitate standard de referire la noua procedură de reglementare cu control.
Aligning the provision to a standard way of referring to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
Comisia elaborează un raport de evaluare a punerii în aplicare a prezentei decizii.
The Commission shall draw up a report evaluating the implementation of this Decision.
Până la 31 octombrie 2016, Comisia prezintă acest raport Parlamentului European și Consiliului, însoțit, dacă este necesar, de propuneri.
The Commission shall submit that report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 31 October 2016, accompanied by proposals as appropriate.
Respectivul raport evaluează, de asemenea, modul în care punerea în aplicare a prezentei decizii a afectat concurența la nivel național, comunitar și internațional.
Th at report shall also evaluate how the implementation of this Decision h as affected competition at national, EU and international level.
In March 2007 the European Council agreed upon climate targets for the European Union.
In March 2007 the European Council agreed upon climate targets for the European Union.
As a part of an international agreement the EU would commit to a 30 % reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.
As a part of an international agreement the EU would commit to a 30 % reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.
Even without an international agreement the EU would independently achieve at least a 20% reduction.
Even without an international agreement the EU would independently achieve at least a 20% reduction.
This proposal is part of the so called EU climate package, which the Commission put forward to implement those decisions.
This proposal is part of the so called EU climate package, which the Commission put forward to implement those decisions.
The EU Emissions Trading System covers roughly half of the EU emissions from 2013 to 2020.
The EU Emissions Trading System covers roughly half of the EU emissions from 2013 to 2020.
The proposal for the Effort Sharing Decision covers the other sectors (such as transport, buildings, services, smaller industrial installations, agriculture and waste) and together the two form the EU emissions cap.
The proposal for the Effort Sharing Decision covers the other sectors (such as transport, buildings, services, smaller industrial installations, agriculture and waste) and together the two form the EU emissions cap.
Reduction target
Reduction target
This proposal of the Commission is based on an overall greenhouse gas reduction target of 20 % by 2020, which will be tightened to 30 %, when an international post 2012 climate agreement is finalised.
This proposal of the Commission is based on an overall greenhouse gas reduction target of 20 % by 2020, which will be tightened to 30 %, when an international post 2012 climate agreement is finalised.
However, the 4th Assessment Report of IPCC concludes that in order to have a 50 % probability to limit global warming below 2 o C compared to pre-industrial levels, industrialised countries need to reduce their emissions by 25-40% compared to 1990.
However, the 4th Assessment Report of IPCC concludes that in order to have a 50 % probability to limit global warming below 2 o C compared to pre-industrial levels, industrialised countries need to reduce their emissions by 25-40% compared to 1990.
This range was explicitly recognised by all industrialised countries apart from the US at the UN Climate Conference in Bali in December 2007.
This range was explicitly recognised by all industrialised countries apart from the US at the UN Climate Conference in Bali in December 2007.
The 20 % reduction target falls clearly below the necessary ambition level.
The 20 % reduction target falls clearly below the necessary ambition level.
Therefore the rapporteur proposes that the 30 % reduction target, which is in line with the advice of the IPCC, is taken as the starting point of this decision, and 20 % reduction is kept as a fallback option, in case an international agreement is delayed.
Therefore the rapporteur proposes that the 30 % reduction target, which is in line with the advice of the IPCC, is taken as the starting point of this decision, and 20 % reduction is kept as a fallback option, in case an international agreement is delayed.
This would direct the planning and implementation measures in the EU member countries to the 30 % reduction from the beginning.
This would direct the planning and implementation measures in the EU member countries to the 30 % reduction from the beginning.
It would not be difficult to relax this target later, if the post 2012 climate agreement would not be in time.
It would not be difficult to relax this target later, if the post 2012 climate agreement would not be in time.
But if Member States prepare themselves and plan measures based on an overall reduction of just 20 %, it will be much more difficult to tighten the measures later.
But if Member States prepare themselves and plan measures based on an overall reduction of just 20 %, it will be much more difficult to tighten the measures later.
Use of Clean Development Mechanism/Joint Implementation
Use of Clean Development Mechanism/Joint Implementation
The Commission proposal allows for a rather generous level of offsetting domestic emissions by using emissions reductions outside of the EU, 3 % of the emissions of the non-ETS sectors in 2005, even in the "no-international-agreement" scenario with 20 % reduction target.
The Commission proposal allows for a rather generous level of offsetting domestic emissions by using emissions reductions outside of the EU, 3 % of the emissions of the non-ETS sectors in 2005, even in the "no-international-agreement" scenario with 20 % reduction target.
The total reduction from 2005 to 2020 in the -20 % scenario in the non-ETS sectors is 1200 Mt.
The total reduction from 2005 to 2020 in the -20 % scenario in the non-ETS sectors is 1200 Mt.
The Commission proposal would mean up to 700 Mt of potential offsets with JI/CDM, which is more than 50 % of the reductions required in these sectors.
The Commission proposal would mean up to 700 Mt of potential offsets with JI/CDM, which is more than 50 % of the reductions required in these sectors.
This large use of JI/CDM credits is not in line with the reduction path given in the IPCC 4th Assessment Report to the industrialised countries to stay within the 2 degrees objective.
This large use of JI/CDM credits is not in line with the reduction path given in the IPCC 4th Assessment Report to the industrialised countries to stay within the 2 degrees objective.
A reduction of 25-40% compared to 1990 is required.
A reduction of 25-40% compared to 1990 is required.
This was confirmed at a workshop (3 June 2008) on the Role of CDM in the climate package, hosted by the rapporteur.
This was confirmed at a workshop (3 June 2008) on the Role of CDM in the climate package, hosted by the rapporteur.
One of the key conclusions was that industrialised countries would need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions with 25-40% compared to 1990 and at the same time the developed countries would need to limit their emissions with 15-30% compared to their business as usual scenario.
One of the key conclusions was that industrialised countries would need to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions with 25-40% compared to 1990 and at the same time the developed countries would need to limit their emissions with 15-30% compared to their business as usual scenario.
Offsetting emissions in industrialised countries by using CDM credits would mean that developing countries would need to do 15-30% in addition to emissions reductions from the CDM projects.
Offsetting emissions in industrialised countries by using CDM credits would mean that developing countries would need to do 15-30% in addition to emissions reductions from the CDM projects.
The large use of JI/CDM furthermore prevents the EU from benefiting from reducing the use of fossil fuels, resulting in improved energy security and air quality.
The large use of JI/CDM furthermore prevents the EU from benefiting from reducing the use of fossil fuels, resulting in improved energy security and air quality.
Achieving the reduction within the EU provides a much stronger incentive for innovation.
Achieving the reduction within the EU provides a much stronger incentive for innovation.
The value of these co-benefits increases when the oil price goes up.
The value of these co-benefits increases when the oil price goes up.
The Commission analysis of 50 billion € saved on our fossil fuel energy bill in 2020 was based on 60 $/barrel, whereas we have already passed 120 $/ barrel and predictions go as far as suggesting a price of 200 $/barrel in the next years.
The Commission analysis of 50 billion € saved on our fossil fuel energy bill in 2020 was based on 60 $/barrel, whereas we have already passed 120 $/ barrel and predictions go as far as suggesting a price of 200 $/barrel in the next years.
To be in line with the advice of IPCC and to ensure a strong incentive for innovations, the rapporteur proposes to reduce the level of offsets from 3% to 1 % in relation to 2005 emissions in the non-ETS sector.
To be in line with the advice of IPCC and to ensure a strong incentive for innovations, the rapporteur proposes to reduce the level of offsets from 3% to 1 % in relation to 2005 emissions in the non-ETS sector.
There are several recent studies, which have suggested significant misgivings regarding the integrity and additionality of the CDM/JI emission reductions.
There are several recent studies, which have suggested significant misgivings regarding the integrity and additionality of the CDM/JI emission reductions.
In the case where offsets are not additional and "real", their use for compliance, instead of domestic emissions reductions will have a net negative effect on climate.
In the case where offsets are not additional and "real", their use for compliance, instead of domestic emissions reductions will have a net negative effect on climate.
Until a new international agreement rapporteur proposes that such credits used after 2012 should be discounted by 50%.
Until a new international agreement rapporteur proposes that such credits used after 2012 should be discounted by 50%.
After the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement, an additional external emissions reduction commitment is proposed to replace CDM/JI offsets as a financing tool for mitigation efforts in developing countries.
After the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement, an additional external emissions reduction commitment is proposed to replace CDM/JI offsets as a financing tool for mitigation efforts in developing countries.
Furthermore the rapporteur thinks that it would be inconsistent to allow for offsets in such industrial sectors which are prone to carbon leakage, when special measures under the ETS are planned to protect the same sectors.
Furthermore the rapporteur thinks that it would be inconsistent to allow for offsets in such industrial sectors which are prone to carbon leakage, when special measures under the ETS are planned to protect the same sectors.
Recognising credits from CDM investments in these sectors would de facto mean financial incentives promoting carbon leakage.
Recognising credits from CDM investments in these sectors would de facto mean financial incentives promoting carbon leakage.
For these reasons the rapporteur proposes to restrict not only the quantity but also the types of CDM/JI offsets.
For these reasons the rapporteur proposes to restrict not only the quantity but also the types of CDM/JI offsets.
Until the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement, the types of CDM offsets allowed and available after 2012 will not be known, as this will be part of the overall negotiations.
Until the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement, the types of CDM offsets allowed and available after 2012 will not be known, as this will be part of the overall negotiations.
The rapporteur proposes that only renewable energy and demand side energy efficiency projects are accepted.
The rapporteur proposes that only renewable energy and demand side energy efficiency projects are accepted.
Additional external emissions reduction obligation
Additional external emissions reduction obligation
The rapporteur proposes a separate external emissions reduction obligation, which would be only effective after the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement.
The rapporteur proposes a separate external emissions reduction obligation, which would be only effective after the finalisation of an international post 2012 climate agreement.
The IPCC 4AR says that to limit the global warming below 2 o C significant deviation from business as usual path also in the developing countries is needed.
The IPCC 4AR says that to limit the global warming below 2 o C significant deviation from business as usual path also in the developing countries is needed.
The rapporteur is of the position that the developed countries have a responsibility to contribute to the required emissions limitation in developed countries.
The rapporteur is of the position that the developed countries have a responsibility to contribute to the required emissions limitation in developed countries.
Co-financing of climate protection investments in developing countries by developed countries must come in addition to their mandatory domestic reductions and should not be used for offsetting their own emissions.
Co-financing of climate protection investments in developing countries by developed countries must come in addition to their mandatory domestic reductions and should not be used for offsetting their own emissions.
Therefore a new commitment for an EU contribution in financing greenhouse gas emission reductions in developing countries must be put in place once the international agreement is reached.
Therefore a new commitment for an EU contribution in financing greenhouse gas emission reductions in developing countries must be put in place once the international agreement is reached.
This external emissions reduction commitment should be divided among the Member States on the basis of GDP/capita and should be binding.
This external emissions reduction commitment should be divided among the Member States on the basis of GDP/capita and should be binding.
The magnitude of the external emission reduction, starting from 250 Mt of CO 2 equivalent per year in 2013, and increasing to 850 Mt/year in 2020 is based on an analysis by the Wuppertal Institute and Ecofys.
The magnitude of the external emission reduction, starting from 250 Mt of CO 2 equivalent per year in 2013, and increasing to 850 Mt/year in 2020 is based on an analysis by the Wuppertal Institute and Ecofys.
They estimate that, on top of the 30 % domestic emission reductions in Annex I countries, approximately 5.7 Gt reduction compared to business as usual is needed in non-Annex I countries.
They estimate that, on top of the 30 % domestic emission reductions in Annex I countries, approximately 5.7 Gt reduction compared to business as usual is needed in non-Annex I countries.
If half of this effort is financed by the Annex I countries and if this is divided according to the 1990 emissions, the share of EU is around 880 Gt of CO 2 -eq.
If half of this effort is financed by the Annex I countries and if this is divided according to the 1990 emissions, the share of EU is around 880 Gt of CO 2 -eq.
Reduction pathway beyond 2020
Reduction pathway beyond 2020