natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Urges Member States to accept that a prior finding of infringement arrived at by the competition authority, once final and confirmed on a possible appeal, automatically constitutes prima facie proof of fault in civil proceedings involving the same issues, provided that the defendant had an adequate opportunity to defend itself in the administrative proceedings;
Urges Member States to accept that a prior finding of infringement arrived at by the competition authority, once final and confirmed on a possible appeal, automatically constitutes prima facie proof of fault in civil proceedings involving the same issues, provided that the defendant had an adequate opportunity to defend itself in the administrative proceedings;
Also underlines that Member States should consider that the possibility to assert a passing-on defence is detrimental to the finding of the extent of the damage and the causal link;
Also underlines that Member States should consider that the possibility to assert a passing-on defence is detrimental to the finding of the extent of the damage and the causal link;
Calls on the Commission to work closely with the competent national authorities of the Member States in order to mitigate any cross-border obstacles that prevent EU citizens and businesses from filing cross-border damages claims in cases of breaches of EC antitrust rules in Member States; considers that, if necessary, the Commission should take legal action to remove such obstacles;
Calls on the Commission to work closely with the competent national authorities of the Member States in order to mitigate any cross-border obstacles that prevent EU citizens and businesses from filing cross-border damages claims in cases of breaches of EC antitrust rules in Member States; considers that, if necessary, the Commission should take legal action to remove such obstacles;
Suggests that the limitation period applying to the right to claim compensation in the event of a breach of antitrust law should be suspended from the time when the Commission or competition authority in one or more Member States opens an investigation into such breach;
Suggests that the limitation period applying to the right to claim compensation in the event of a breach of antitrust law should be suspended from the time when the Commission or competition authority in one or more Member States opens an investigation into such breach;
Further considers that claims for damages resulting from a breach of antitrust laws do not require any specialised courts, unless provided for in the legal procedures of the Member States;
Further considers that claims for damages resulting from a breach of antitrust laws do not require any specialised courts, unless provided for in the legal procedures of the Member States;
Considers that any proposed instrument must fully respect the public policy of the Member States, in particular with regard to punitive damages;
Considers that any proposed instrument must fully respect the public policy of the Member States, in particular with regard to punitive damages;
Considers it inappropriate to adapt at Community level the national rules concerning the disclosure of documentary evidence and the burden of proof in civil proceedings for damages under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty;
Considers it inappropriate to adapt at Community level the national rules concerning the disclosure of documentary evidence and the burden of proof in civil proceedings for damages under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty;
Further considers it unnecessary to discuss and prescribe at Community level the need for the appointment of experts, clarification of the legal requirement of causation and the possibility of bringing collective actions, since those elements may be regarded as rooted in the tradition of national legal systems;
Further considers it unnecessary to discuss and prescribe at Community level the need for the appointment of experts, clarification of the legal requirement of causation and the possibility of bringing collective actions, since those elements may be regarded as rooted in the tradition of national legal systems;
Considers that, whilst the proposed Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ('Rome II') should provide a satisfactory solution save where the anticompetitive behaviour affects competition in more than one State, consideration should be given to a special rule to be inserted into that Regulation;
Considers that, whilst the proposed Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ('Rome II') should provide a satisfactory solution save where the anticompetitive behaviour affects competition in more than one State, consideration should be given to a special rule to be inserted into that Regulation;
Considers that the Commission is not entitled to decide unilaterally and in advance upon which markets to focus its antitrust public-enforcement activities, and that initiatives should be launched only if they have received political backing from the European Parliament and the Council.
Considers that the Commission is not entitled to decide unilaterally and in advance upon which markets to focus its antitrust public-enforcement activities, and that initiatives should be launched only if they have received political backing from the European Parliament and the Council.
Carte verde: acţiunile în despăgubiri în cazul încălcării normelor comunitare antitrust
Green Paper: Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
Cartea verde privind acţiunile în despăgubiri în cazul încălcării normelor comunitare antitrust
Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
PE 384.265v01-00
PE 384.265v02-00
(Codecision procedure: a doua lectură)
(Codecision procedure: second reading)
– având în vedere poziţia comună a Consiliului (14039/1/2006 – C6 0041/2007),
– having regard to the Council common position (14039/1/2006 – C6‑0041/2007 ),
Text adoptat, 15.06.2006, P6_TA(2006)0267 . referitoare la propunerea Comisiei înaintată Parlamentului European şi Consiliului ( COM(2005)0429 )
Adopted Text , 15.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0267 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0429 )
– având în vedere recomandarea pentru a doua lectură a Comisiei pentru transport şi turism ( A6-0134/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0134/2007 ),
În vederea protejării persoanelor şi a bunurilor în interiorul Uniunii Europene de actele de intervenţie ilicită îndreptate împotriva aeronavelor civile, trebuie stabilite norme comune de protecţie a aviaţiei civile.
(1) In order to protect persons and goods within the European Union from acts of unlawful interference with civil aircraft, common rules for safeguarding civil aviation should be established .
Acest obiectiv trebuie îndeplinit prin stabilirea de norme şi standarde de bază comune în materie de siguranţă aeriană, precum şi mecanisme de monitorizare a conformităţii.
This objective should be achieved by setting common rules and common basic standards on aviation security as well as mechanisms for monitoring compliance.
(1) În vederea protejării persoanelor şi a bunurilor în interiorul Uniunii Europene, ar fi necesară împiedicarea actelor de intervenţie ilicită îndreptate împotriva aeronavelor civile , care pun în pericol siguranţa aviaţiei civile, prin stabilirea unor norme comune de protecţie acesteia .
(1) In order to protect persons and goods within the European Union, acts of unlawful interference with civil aircraft , which jeopardise the security of civil aviation should be prevented by establishing common rules for safeguarding civil aviation.
(6) Prezentul regulament trebuie să se aplice aeroporturilor care deservesc aviaţia civilă situate pe teritoriul unui stat membru, operatorilor care furnizează servicii în aceste aeroporturi şi entităţilor care furnizează bunuri şi/sau servicii acestor aeroporturi sau prin acestea.
(6) This Regulation should apply to airports serving civil aviation located in the territory of a Member State, to operators providing services at such airports and to entities providing goods and/or services to or through such airports.
(6) Noul act ar trebui să se aplice aeroporturilor care deservesc aviaţia civilă, situate pe teritoriul unui stat membru, operatorilor care furnizează servicii în aceste aeroporturi şi entităţilor care furnizează bunuri şi/sau servicii acestor aeroporturi sau prin acestea.
(6) The new act should apply to airports serving civil aviation located in the territory of a Member State, to operators providing services at such airports and to entities providing goods and/or services to or through such airports.
(10) Pe baza unei evaluări a riscurilor, trebuie de asemenea să li se permită statelor membre să aplice măsuri mai stricte decât cele prevăzute în prezentul regulament .
(10) Member States should also be allowed, on the basis of a risk assessment, to apply more stringent measures than those laid down in this Regulation .
(10) Pe baza unei evaluări a riscurilor, ar trebui, de asemenea, să li se permită statelor membre să aplice măsuri mai stricte decât cele ce urmează a fi stabilite .
(10) Member States should also be allowed, on the basis of a risk assessment, to apply more stringent measures than those to be laid down.
Cu toate acestea, ar trebui să se facă o distincţie între normele de bază curente şi măsurile mai stricte , iar o distincţie similară ar trebui să se aplice şi în privinţa finanţării acestora.
A distinction should be drawn, however, between common basic standards and more stringent measures and there should be a similar distinction in their funding.
Ţări terţe pot solicita aplicarea de măsuri care diferă de cele prevăzute de prezentul regulament în ceea ce priveşte zborurile cu plecare dintr-un aeroport al unui stat membru având ca destinaţie sau survolând ţara terţă respectivă.
(11) Third countries may require the application of measures that differ from those laid down in this Regulation in respect of flights from an airport in a Member State to, or over, that third country.
Cu toate acestea, fără a aduce atingere acordurilor bilaterale la care Comunitatea este parte, Comisia trebuie să poată examina măsurile solicitate de ţara terţă.
However, without prejudice to any bilateral agreements to which the Community is a party, it should be possible for the Commission to examine the measures required by the third country.
Ţări terţe pot solicita aplicarea de măsuri care diferă de cele prevăzute de prezentul act în ceea ce priveşte zborurile cu plecare dintr-un aeroport al unui stat membru având ca destinaţie sau survolând ţara terţă respectivă.
(11) Third countries may require the application of measures that differ from those laid down in this act in respect of flights from an airport in a Member State to, or over, that third country.
Cu toate acestea, fără a aduce atingere acordurilor bilaterale la care Comunitatea este parte, Comisia ar trebui să poată examina măsurile solicitate de ţara terţă şi să decidă dacă un stat membru, un operator sau o altă entitate interesată poate să aplice în continuare măsurile solicitate .
However, without prejudice to any bilateral agreements to which the Community is a party, it should be possible for the Commission to examine the measures required by the third country and to decide whether a Member State , operator or other entity concerned may continue to apply the measures required .
Deşi în cadrul unui acelaşi stat membru pot exista două sau mai multe organisme al căror obiect de activitate este siguranţa aviaţiei, fiecare stat membru trebuie să desemneze o autoritate competentă unică, responsabilă cu coordonarea şi monitorizarea aplicării de standarde bază comune privind siguranţa aeriană .
(12) Even though, within a single Member State, there may be two or more bodies involved in aviation security, each Member State should designate a single authority responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of common basic standards on aviation security.
Deşi în cadrul unui acelaşi stat membru pot exista două sau mai multe organisme sau entităţi al căror obiect de activitate este siguranţa aviaţiei, fiecare stat membru trebuie să desemneze o autoritate competentă unică, responsabilă cu coordonarea şi monitorizarea aplicării standardelor privind siguranţa .
(12) Even though, within a single Member State, there may be two or more bodies or entities involved in aviation security, each Member State should designate a single authority responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of security standards.
În scopul de a defini responsabilităţile pentru aplicarea standardelor de bază comune privind siguranţa aeriană şi de a descrie măsurile solicitate de către operatori şi de alte entităţi în acest scop, fiecare stat membru trebuie să stabilească un program naţional de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile.
(13) In order to define responsibilities for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security and to describe what measures are required by operators and other entities for this purpose, each Member State should draw up a national civil aviation security programme.
Mai mult decât atât, fiecare operator aeroportuar, transportator aerian şi entitate de aplicare a standardelor de siguranţă aeriană trebuie să stabilească, să aplice şi să menţină un program de siguranţă pentru a se conforma atât prezentului regulament , cât şi oricărui program de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile aplicabil.
Furthermore, each airport operator, air carrier and entity implementing aviation security standards should draw up, apply and maintain a security programme in order to comply both with this Regulation and with whichever national civil aviation security programme is applicable.
În scopul de a defini responsabilităţile pentru aplicarea standardelor de bază comune şi de a descrie măsurile solicitate de către operatori şi de alte entităţi în acest scop, fiecare stat membru trebuie să stabilească un program naţional de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile.
(13) In order to define responsibilities for the implementation of the common basic standards and to describe what measures are required by operators and other entities for this purpose, each Member State should draw up a national civil aviation security programme.
Mai mult decât atât, fiecare operator aeroportuar, transportator aerian şi entitate de aplicare a standardelor de siguranţă aeriană trebuie să stabilească, să aplice şi să menţină un program de siguranţă pentru a se conforma atât noului act , cât şi oricărui program de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile aplicabil.
Furthermore, each airport operator, air carrier and entity applying aviation security standards should draw up, apply and maintain a security programme in order to comply both with the new act and with whichever national civil aviation security programme is applicable.
În scopul de a monitoriza conformitatea cu prezentul regulament şi cu programul naţional de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile, fiecare stat membru trebuie să stabilească şi să asigure aplicarea unui program naţional de verificare a calităţii siguranţei aviaţiei civile.
(14) In order to monitor compliance with this Regulation and with the national civil aviation security programme, each Member State should draw up and ensure the implementation of a national programme to check the quality of civil aviation security.
În scopul de a monitoriza conformitatea cu noul act şi cu programul naţional de siguranţă a aviaţiei civile, fiecare stat membru trebuie să stabilească şi să asigure aplicarea unui program naţional de verificare a nivelului siguranţei aviaţiei civile.
(14) In order to monitor compliance with the new act and with the national civil aviation security programme, each Member State should draw up and ensure the implementation of a national programme to check the level of civil aviation security.
Considerentul 15 a (nou)
Recital 15 a (new)
(15a) În cadrul extinderii viitoare a competenţelor sale, Agenţia europeană de siguranţă a aviaţiei ar trebui să fie integrată treptat în monitorizarea respectării conformităţii cu dispoziţiile comune privind siguranţa aviaţiei civile.
(15a) In the context of the forthcoming extension of its competences, the European Aviation Safety Agency should gradually be integrated into the monitoring of compliance with common provisions on civil aviation security.
(16) Normele de aplicare stabilind măsuri şi proceduri comune pentru aplicarea standardelor de bază comune privind siguranţa aviaţiei şi conţinând informaţii de siguranţă sensibile, alături de rapoartele de inspecţie ale Comisiei şi răspunsurile din partea autorităţilor competente trebuie considerate „informaţii clasificate ale UE” în înţelesul Deciziei 2001/844/CE, CECO, Euratom a Comisiei din 29 noiembrie 2001 de modificare a regulamentului său de procedură internă .
(16) Implementing acts setting out common measures and procedures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security and containing sensitive security information, together with Commission inspection reports and answers of appropriate authorities should be regarded as "EU classified information" within the meaning of Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29 November 2001 amending its internal rules of procedure.
Aceste documente nu trebuie publicate, ci trebuie puse doar la dispoziţia acelor operatori şi entităţi care au un interes legitim.
Those items should not be published; they should only be made available to those operators and entities with a legitimate interest.
(16) Normele de aplicare prin care se stabilesc măsuri şi proceduri comune pentru aplicarea standardelor de bază comune şi care conţin informaţii de siguranţă sensibile, alături de rapoartele de inspecţie ale Comisiei şi răspunsurile din partea autorităţilor competente trebuie considerate „informaţii clasificate ale UE” în înţelesul Deciziei 2001/844/CE, CECO, Euratom a Comisiei din 29 noiembrie 2001 de modificare a regulamentului său de procedură internă .
(16) Implementing acts setting out common measures and procedures for the implementation of the common basic standards and containing sensitive security information, together with Commission inspection reports and answers of appropriate national authorities should be regarded as "EU classified information" within the meaning of Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29 November 2001 amending its internal rules of procedure.
(18a) Pentru ca pasagerii şi bagajele în escală să nu mai facă obiectul unei inspecţii la îmbarcarea pe o aeronavă al cărei punct de plecare este într-o ţară terţă, noţiune cunoscută sub numele de „sistem de control unic de siguranţă”, şi pentru a permite pasagerilor care au călătorit cu o astfel de aeronavă să se amestece cu pasagerii controlaţi la plecare, este oportun să se încurajeze încheierea unor acorduri între Comunitate şi ţările terţe, prin care să se confirme faptul că standardele de siguranţă aplicate în ţara terţă sunt echivalente cu standardele comunitare.
(18a) For the purpose of allowing transfer passengers and transfer baggage to be exempted from screening when arriving on a flight from a third country, which is known as the concept of “one-stop security”, as well as for allowing passengers arriving on such a flight to mix with screened departing passengers, it is appropriate to encourage agreements between the Community and third countries, recognising that the security standards applied in the third country are equivalent to Community standards.
(21) Statele membre stabilesc sancţiunile aplicabile pentru nerespectarea dispoziţiilor prezentului regulament.
(21) Member States should determine the penalties applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation .
Sancţiunile prevăzute, care pot fi de natură civilă sau administrativă, trebuie să fie eficace, adecvate şi descurajante .
The penalties provided for, which may be of a civil or administrative nature, should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
(21) Este necesar să se stabilească sancţiuni pentru nerespectarea dispoziţiilor prezentului regulament.
(21) Penalties should be provided for infringements of the provisions of this Regulation.
Sancţiunile în cauză ar trebui să fie efective, proporţionale şi cu efect de descurajare .
Those penalties should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Considerentul 22 a (nou)
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) Ar trebui avută în vedere instituirea unui mecanism de solidaritate care ar putea oferi asistenţă în urma unui act de terorism cu un impact major asupra sectorului transporturilor.
(22a) Consideration should be given to the creation of a solidarity mechanism that could offer assistance following terrorist acts with a major impact on the transport field.
Prezentul regulament instituie norme comune de protecţie a aviaţiei civile împotriva actelor de intervenţie ilicită.
This Regulation establishes common rules to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference.
Prezentul regulament stabileşte norme comune de protecţie a aviaţiei civile împotriva actelor de intervenţie ilicită care pun în pericol siguranţa aviaţiei civile .
This Regulation establishes common rules to protect civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference that jeopardise the security of civil aviation.
De asemenea, acesta constituie baza unei interpretări comune a anexei 17 a Convenţiei de la Chicago privind aviaţia civilă internaţională.
It also provides the basis for a common interpretation of Annex 17 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
De asemenea, acesta constituie baza unei interpretări comune a versiunii din aprilie 2002 a anexei 17 a Convenţiei de la Chicago privind aviaţia civilă internaţională.
It also provides the basis for a common interpretation of the April 2002 issue of Annex 17 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Articolul 2 alineatul (1) litera (a)
Article 2, paragraph 1, point (a)
(a) toate aeroporturile sau părţile de aeroporturi localizate pe teritoriul unui stat membru care nu sunt folosite exclusiv în scopuri militare ;
a) all airports or parts of airports located in the territory of a Member State that are not exclusively used for military purposes ;
(a) toate aeroporturile sau părţile de aeroporturi localizate pe teritoriul unui stat membru care deservesc aviaţia civilă ;
a) all airports or parts of airports serving civil aviation located in the territory of a Member State;
Articolul 3 punctul 1
Article 3, point 1
1. „aviaţie civilă” înseamnă orice operaţiune de transport aerian efectuată de o aeronavă civilă, excluzând operaţiunile efectuate de o aeronavă de stat menţionată la articolul 3 al Convenţiei de la Chicago privind aviaţia civilă internaţională;
1) "civil aviation" means any air operation carried out by civil aircraft, excluding operations carried out by state aircraft referred to in Article 3 of the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation;
1. „aviaţie civilă” înseamnă orice operaţiune de transport aerian, comercială sau necomercială, regulată sau neregulată, excluzând operaţiunile efectuate de o aeronavă de stat menţionată la articolul 3 al Convenţiei de la Chicago privind aviaţia civilă internaţională din 1944;
1) "civil aviation" means any air transport operation, both commercial and non-commercial, as well as both scheduled and non-scheduled operations, but excluding operations carried out by state aircraft referred to in Article 3 of the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation;
Articolul 3 punctul 2
Article 3, point 2
2. „siguranţă aeriană” înseamnă combinarea măsurilor şi resurselor umane şi materiale menite să protejeze aviaţia civilă împotriva actelor de intervenţie ilicită;
2) "aviation security" means the combination of measures and human and material resources intended to safeguard civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference;