natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
At the Transport Council of 8 to 9 June 2006 the Council adopted a general approach with regard to its proposal containing all the elements forming part of the Council’s present common position.
At the Transport Council of 8 to 9 June 2006 the Council adopted a general approach with regard to its proposal containing all the elements forming part of the Council’s present common position.
The European Parliament adopted its opinion on first reading on 25 April 2007.
The European Parliament adopted its opinion on first reading on 25 April 2007.
In other words, at no time did the Council take account of Parliament’s views, and it shows.
In other words, at no time did the Council take account of Parliament’s views, and it shows.
In fact, the Council has adopted only five of Parliament’s amendments.
In fact, the Council has adopted only five of Parliament’s amendments.
Proposals by your rapporteur on second reading
Proposals by your rapporteur on second reading
Your rapporteur takes the firm view that the original Commission proposal together with Parliament’s amendments on first reading, forms a good basis for further improving European policy regarding the accommodation of vessels in distress.
Your rapporteur takes the firm view that the original Commission proposal together with Parliament’s amendments on first reading, forms a good basis for further improving European policy regarding the accommodation of vessels in distress.
Given that the Council has not considered Parliament’s views on first reading and has, in addition, abandoned a number of Commission proposals, your rapporteur recommends an almost full return to the status quo regarding Parliament’s position on first reading.
Given that the Council has not considered Parliament’s views on first reading and has, in addition, abandoned a number of Commission proposals, your rapporteur recommends an almost full return to the status quo regarding Parliament’s position on first reading.
– Designation of an independent competent authority
– Designation of an independent competent authority
The designation of an independent competent authority for the accommodation of vessels in distress has always been something to which Parliament has always attached great importance with the full support of the Commission.
The designation of an independent competent authority for the accommodation of vessels in distress has always been something to which Parliament has always attached great importance with the full support of the Commission.
The successive disasters and near-disasters show that much time is often wasted because it was not clear who was responsible for what or because those competent to take a decision had to call on the expertise of a team which often had to be set up on an ad hoc basis.
The successive disasters and near-disasters show that much time is often wasted because it was not clear who was responsible for what or because those competent to take a decision had to call on the expertise of a team which often had to be set up on an ad hoc basis.
The Council’s own provisions on this matter are vague and would result in practically no improvement in practice.
The Council’s own provisions on this matter are vague and would result in practically no improvement in practice.
The amendments proposed by your rapporteur do not require the Member State to abandon totally their internal structure.
The amendments proposed by your rapporteur do not require the Member State to abandon totally their internal structure.
They seek to ensure that the competent authority has the necessary independent (maritime) expertise to be able to decided independently should an incident occur on the best course of action to avoid a disaster or contain the consequences thereof as far as possible.
They seek to ensure that the competent authority has the necessary independent (maritime) expertise to be able to decided independently should an incident occur on the best course of action to avoid a disaster or contain the consequences thereof as far as possible.
– The concept of a ship in need of assistance as opposed to a ship in distress
– The concept of a ship in need of assistance as opposed to a ship in distress
The Commission, supported by the European Parliament, used the expression ‘ship in distress’.
The Commission, supported by the European Parliament, used the expression ‘ship in distress’.
Basing itself of IMO guidelines for the accommodation of ships in need of assistance, the Council used the expression ‘ship in need of assistance’.
Basing itself of IMO guidelines for the accommodation of ships in need of assistance, the Council used the expression ‘ship in need of assistance’.
You rapporteur can agree with the Council but is dissatisfied with the Council’s definition, which appears to disregard the importance of human lives in accommodating ships in difficulties.
You rapporteur can agree with the Council but is dissatisfied with the Council’s definition, which appears to disregard the importance of human lives in accommodating ships in difficulties.
The link with the Search and Rescue Convention of 1979 (SAR) concerning the rescue of human lives must be clarified.
The link with the Search and Rescue Convention of 1979 (SAR) concerning the rescue of human lives must be clarified.
– Fair treatment of masters and crews in the event of an accident
– Fair treatment of masters and crews in the event of an accident
Your rapporteur calls for the implementation by the Member States of IMO guidelines concerning the fair treatment of ships’ crews.
Your rapporteur calls for the implementation by the Member States of IMO guidelines concerning the fair treatment of ships’ crews.
The Council does not mention this.
The Council does not mention this.
For fear of arrest, masters often postpone calling for help, thus wasting valuable time.
For fear of arrest, masters often postpone calling for help, thus wasting valuable time.
– Consequences of absence of an insurance certificate or financial guarantee
– Consequences of absence of an insurance certificate or financial guarantee
The absence of evidence of financial security must be a factor in the assessment and decision on accommodating a ship in distress.
The absence of evidence of financial security must be a factor in the assessment and decision on accommodating a ship in distress.
Naturally a problem arises if a ship in distress does not have (adequate) insurance.
Naturally a problem arises if a ship in distress does not have (adequate) insurance.
However, it is not desirable that only insured vessels should be accommodated in a place of refugee.
However, it is not desirable that only insured vessels should be accommodated in a place of refugee.
The Council decided to simply abandon Article 20 b of the Commission proposal and omit all references to the directive on the financial responsibility of shipowners ( COM(2005)0593 and COM(2007)0674 , Savary report).
The Council decided to simply abandon Article 20 b of the Commission proposal and omit all references to the directive on the financial responsibility of shipowners ( COM(2005)0593 and COM(2007)0674 , Savary report).
– Compensation schemes for places of refuge and ports
– Compensation schemes for places of refuge and ports
In exceptional cases, the accommodation of a ship may give rise to damage and costs for the port in question which are not covered by existing funds or conventions.
In exceptional cases, the accommodation of a ship may give rise to damage and costs for the port in question which are not covered by existing funds or conventions.
Parliament has repeatedly called in recent years for a compensation scheme to be devised for such cases.
Parliament has repeatedly called in recent years for a compensation scheme to be devised for such cases.
A compensation arrangement might help to reduce any resistance of ports to providing refuge.
A compensation arrangement might help to reduce any resistance of ports to providing refuge.
– Introduction of automatic identification system for fishing vessels
– Introduction of automatic identification system for fishing vessels
On first reading, Parliament called for a less stringent timetable for fishing vessels, a proposal which the Council did not accept.
On first reading, Parliament called for a less stringent timetable for fishing vessels, a proposal which the Council did not accept.
This is one of the few points where the Council’s proposals are more stringent than those of Parliament.
This is one of the few points where the Council’s proposals are more stringent than those of Parliament.
Your rapporteur agrees with the Council.
Your rapporteur agrees with the Council.
The AIS is clearly of value to small fishing vessels, in particular since this is the category of vessel frequently involved in collisions with fatal consequences for the crew.
The AIS is clearly of value to small fishing vessels, in particular since this is the category of vessel frequently involved in collisions with fatal consequences for the crew.
Despite the fact that accommodating a ship in difficulties was one of the main problems in the case of both the Erika and the Prestige, the Council refuses to provide a clear definition of the authority competent to make decisions in case of disaster.
Despite the fact that accommodating a ship in difficulties was one of the main problems in the case of both the Erika and the Prestige, the Council refuses to provide a clear definition of the authority competent to make decisions in case of disaster.
Your rapporteur calls on the Member States once more to show the necessary political courage to take a further step forward regarding European maritime safety policy.
Your rapporteur calls on the Member States once more to show the necessary political courage to take a further step forward regarding European maritime safety policy.
Let us not wait until we are forced to do so by another shipping disaster.
Let us not wait until we are forced to do so by another shipping disaster.
Sistem comunitar de monitorizare și informare privind traficul navelor maritime
Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system
Data primei lecturi a PE – Numărul P
Date of Parliament ’s first reading – P number
Gabriele Albertini, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Brigitte Fouré, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Erik Meijer, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Țicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Brigitte Fouré, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Erik Meijer, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Roberts Zīle
referitoare la poziţia comună a Consiliului în vederea adoptării directivei Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului privind controlul statului portului (reformare)
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on port State control (Recast)
(Procedura de codecizie: a doua lectură – reformare)
(Codecision procedure: second reading - recast)
– având în vedere poziţia comună a Consiliului (5722/3/2008 – C6–0224/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (5722/3/2008 – C6‑0224/2008 ),
584. referitoare la propunerea Comisiei prezentată Parlamentului European şi Consiliului ( COM(2005)0588 ),
584. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0588 ),
– având în vedere propunerea modificată a Comisiei ( COM(2008)0208 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2008)0208 ),
– având în vedere recomandarea pentru a doua lectură a Comisiei pentru transport şi turism (A6–033508),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6‑033508),
(4a) În acest sens, statele membre ar trebui să depună eforturi pentru luarea măsurilor necesare în vederea ratificării Convenţiei privind munca în domeniul maritim din 2006 a Organizaţiei Internaţionale a Muncii, care cuprinde prevederi legate de obligaţiile statului portului în partea 5.2.1.
(4a) To this end, Member States should endeavour to take the necessary steps to ratify the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, of the International Labour Organisation, which contains provisions related to port State obligations in part 5.2.1 .
This Convention, which codifies and updates international maritime labour law and contributes to the improvement of safety at sea, contains provisions applicable to port state control.
This Convention, which codifies and updates international maritime labour law and contributes to the improvement of safety at sea, contains provisions applicable to port state control.
It is desirable to mention this with a view to encouraging the Member States to ratify it at an early date.
It is desirable to mention this with a view to encouraging the Member States to ratify it at an early date.
(4a) Statele membre adoptă dispoziţiile necesare pentru a adapta legislaţia internă la dispoziţiile privind limitarea răspunderii din cadrul Convenţiei din 1996.
(4 a) Member States shall take the necessary measures to adapt their national law to the provisions on limitation of liability of the 1996 Convention.
Din hotărârea Curții de Justiție a Comunităților Europene în cauza C-188/07 1 rezultă că acordarea de despăgubiri terţilor pentru prejudiciile cauzate de deşeuri derivă din principiul „poluatorul plătește”, stabilit în Directiva 75/442/CEE a Consiliului din 15 iulie 1975 privind deșeurile 2 și în conformitate cu Directiva 2004/35/CE a Parlamentului European și a Consiliului din 21 aprilie 2004 privind răspunderea pentru mediul înconjurător în legătură cu prevenirea și repararea daunelor aduse mediului 3 , fapt ce introduce dreptul la despăgubiri pentru toate prejudiciile cauzate, inclusiv în cazurile în care acestea nu sunt acoperite în totalitate şi independent de dispoziţiile naţionale privind transpunerea convenţiilor.
Regarding the ECJ decision in Case C-188/07, it appears that compensation to third parties in respect of damage caused by waste falls under the 'polluter pays' principle enunciated in Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste 1 and under Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage 2 , opening up the right to be compensated for the totality of the damage caused, including where there is n o t complete coverage and beyond the national provisions on incorporation of conventions.
1 Hotărâre din 24 iunie 2008 (comuna Mesquer), nepublicată încă în Culegere.
1 Decision of 24 June 2008 (Mesquer municipality) - not yet published in the ECJ Reports.
2 JO L 194, 25.7.1975, p.
2 OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p.
3 JO L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
3 OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
(15) Navele care fac escală în porturi comunitare sunt supuse inspecţiilor periodice şi suplimentare , care includ verificarea unei serii de aspecte identificate în prealabil pentru fiecare navă, care vor varia în funcţie de tipul navei, de tipul inspecţiei şi de constatările inspecţiilor anterioare efectuate în cadrul controlului statului portului.
(15) Ships calling at Community ports are subject to periodic and additional inspections that include an examination of pre-identified areas for each ship, which will vary according to the type of ship, the type of inspection and the findings of previous port State control inspections.
În baza de date privind inspecţiile ar trebui să se precizeze elementele necesare identificării domeniilor de risc supuse verificării în cadrul fiecărei inspecţii.
The inspection database should indicate the elements to identify the risk areas to be checked at each inspection.
(15) Inspecţiile periodice şi suplimentare ar trebui să includă verificarea unei serii de aspecte identificate în prealabil pentru fiecare navă, care vor varia în funcţie de tipul navei, de tipul inspecţiei şi de constatările inspecţiilor anterioare efectuate în cadrul controlului statului portului.
(15) Periodic and additional inspections sh ould include an examination of pre-identified areas for each ship which, will vary according to the type of ship, the type of inspection and the findings of previous port State control inspections.
The frequency of inspections does not determine their content, which will depend on the type of ship, the type of inspection and previous inspections.
The frequency of inspections does not determine their content, which will depend on the type of ship, the type of inspection and previous inspections.
To ensure inspections are effectively harmonised, check-lists should be available.
To ensure inspections are effectively harmonised, check-lists should be available.
(18) Pentru a pune la dispoziţia autorităţilor competente să efectueze controlul statului portului informaţii privind navele din porturi, autorităţile portuare sau autorităţile şi organismele desemnate în acest scop ar trebui să transmită notificări privind sosirile navelor, în măsura în care este posibil chiar la primirea acestora, ţinând seama, mai ales, de capacitatea acestora de a asigura personal suficient în afara orelor normale de program ale birourilor acestora.
(18) In order to provide the competent port State control authorities with information on ships in ports, port authorities or the authorities or bodies designated for that purpose should forward notifications on arrivals of ships, on receipt to the extent possible, notably depending on their capacity to maintain sufficient resources outside usual opening hours of their offices.
This provision allows sub standard vessels to call at night.
This provision allows sub standard vessels to call at night.
(19) Anumite nave prezintă un risc evident pentru siguranţa maritimă şi pentru siguranţa mediului marin din cauza stării lor precare, a performanţei şi antecedentelor pavilionului .
(19) Some ships pose a manifest risk to maritime safety and the marine environment because of their poor condition, flag performance and history.
Prin urmare, Comunitatea este îndreptăţită să descurajeze intrarea acestor nave în porturile statelor membre .
It is therefore legitimate for the Community to dissuade those ships from entering the ports of Member States.
Refuzul accesului ar trebui să fie proporţional şi ar putea conduce la refuzul accesului pe termen nelimitat dacă, în mod sistematic, operatorul navei nu ia măsuri corective, în pofida mai multor refuzuri ale accesului şi reţineri în porturi comunitare.
The refusal of access should be proportionate and could result in an indefinite refusal of access, if the operator of the ship persistently fails to take corrective action in spite of several refusals of access and detentions in ports within the Community.
Refuzul accesului pe termen nelimitat ar trebui retras numai în cazul în care sunt îndeplinite o serie de condiţii destinate să garanteze faptul că nava în cauză poate fi operată în apele comunitare în condiţii de siguranţă, în special cu privire la statul de pavilion şi la compania care o administrează.
This indefinite refusal of access should only be lifted if a number of conditions designed to ensure that the ship concerned can be operated safely in Community waters, in particular relating to the flag State of the ship and the managing company, are fulfilled.
Pentru asigurarea transparenţei, lista navelor cărora li s-a refuzat accesul în porturile comunitare ar trebui făcută publică.
In the interests of transparency, the list of ships refused access to ports within the Community should be made public.
(19) Anumite nave prezintă un risc evident pentru siguranţa maritimă şi pentru siguranţa mediului marin din cauza stării lor precare, a pavilionului şi a antecedentelor.
(19) Some ships pose a manifest risk to maritime safety and the marine environment because of their poor condition, flag and history.
În consecinţă, ar trebui să se interzică accesul acestor nave în porturile şi zonele de ancoraj ale Comunităţii, cu excepţia cazurilor în care se demonstrează că acestea pot fi operate în condiţii de siguranţă în apele Comunităţii .
They should therefore be refused access to Community ports and anchorages, unless it can be demonstrated that they can be operated safely in Community waters.
Ar trebui prevăzute orientări prin care să se stabilească procedurile aplicabile în cazul interzicerii accesului, precum şi al ridicării acestei interdicţii.
Guidelines should be established setting out the procedures applicable in the event of the imposition of such an access ban and of the lifting of the ban.
Pentru asigurarea transparenţei, lista navelor cărora li s-a refuzat accesul în porturile şi zonele de ancoraj comunitare ar trebui făcută publică.
In the interests of transparency, the list of ships refused access to Community ports and anchorages should be made public.
Refusal of access should also apply to Community anchorages.
Refusal of access should also apply to Community anchorages.
(22) Ar trebui să se prevadă dreptul de a contesta ordinele de reţinere luate de autorităţile competente, în vederea evitării emiterii unor decizii nerezonabile care pot duce la întârzieri sau reţineri nejustificate.
(22) A right of appeal against detention orders by the competent authorities should be made available, in order to prevent unreasonable decisions which may cause undue detention and delay.
(Nu priveşte versiunea în limba română.)
(22) A right of appeal against detention orders by the competent authorities should be made available, in order to prevent unreasonable decisions which may cause undue detention and delay.
(25) Plângerile privind condiţiile de viaţă şi de muncă la bordul navelor ar trebui cercetate.
(25) Complaints regarding on‑board living and working conditions should be investigated.
Autorul unei astfel de plângeri ar trebui informat cu privire la acţiunile întreprinse ca urmare a acesteia.
Any person lodging a complaint should be informed of the follow‑up action given to that complaint.
(25) Plângerile , provenind de la persoane care au un interes legitim, privind condiţiile de viaţă şi de muncă la bordul navelor ar trebui cercetate.
(25) Complaints from persons with a legitimate interest regarding on‑board living and working conditions should be investigated.
Recital brought into line with article.
Recital brought into line with article.
(c) punerea în aplicare în cadrul Comunităţii a unui sistem de control al statului portului, bazat pe inspecţii efectuate în cadrul Comunităţii şi al regiunii aflate în domeniul de aplicare a MOU Paris, care vizează inspectarea tuturor navelor cu o frecvenţă variabilă în funcţie de profilul de risc al acestora, navele care prezintă un risc mai ridicat făcând obiectul unor inspecţii mai amănunţite şi efectuate cu o frecvenţă mai mare.
(c) implementing within the Community a port State control system based on the inspections performed within the Community and the Paris MOU region, aiming at the inspection of all ships with a frequency depending on their risk profile, with ships posing a higher risk being subject to a more detailed inspection carried out at more frequent intervals.