natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As part of implementation of its action plan to simplify the common agricultural policy, the Commission has put forward a proposal for a regulation that consolidates the existing 21 regulations on sector-specific common market organisations (CMOs) and combines them into a single basic regulation with a view to streamlining and simplifying the legal framework without changing the underlying policy.
As part of implementation of its action plan to simplify the common agricultural policy, the Commission has put forward a proposal for a regulation that consolidates the existing 21 regulations on sector-specific common market organisations (CMOs) and combines them into a single basic regulation with a view to streamlining and simplifying the legal framework without changing the underlying policy.
The proposal is a follow-up to the strategy commenced with the 2003 reform of the common agricultural policy where a horizontal legal framework was established for all direct payments and an array of support systems was amalgamated in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (the single payment scheme).
The proposal is a follow-up to the strategy commenced with the 2003 reform of the common agricultural policy where a horizontal legal framework was established for all direct payments and an array of support systems was amalgamated in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (the single payment scheme).
The result of this proposal will be a single set of harmonised rules in the classic areas of intervention, private storage, import tariff quotas, export refunds, safeguard measures, state aid and competition rules and the communication and reporting of data.
The result of this proposal will be a single set of harmonised rules in the classic areas of intervention, private storage, import tariff quotas, export refunds, safeguard measures, state aid and competition rules and the communication and reporting of data.
The existing sector-specific rules have been re-arranged by instrument or policy area and merged where possible into horizontal provisions.
The existing sector-specific rules have been re-arranged by instrument or policy area and merged where possible into horizontal provisions.
This is possible because most basic regulations follow the same structure and have numerous provisions in common.
This is possible because most basic regulations follow the same structure and have numerous provisions in common.
This is the case in particular as regards the rules on trade with third countries and general provisions but also to a certain extent for the rules related to the internal market.
This is the case in particular as regards the rules on trade with third countries and general provisions but also to a certain extent for the rules related to the internal market.
The basic sectoral regulations contain different solutions to identical or similar problems which the Commission has harmonised and simplified in its proposal with a horizontal approach.
The basic sectoral regulations contain different solutions to identical or similar problems which the Commission has harmonised and simplified in its proposal with a horizontal approach.
The ongoing reforms of market organisations will not be affected initially but their outcome will subsequently be incorporated into the regulation.
The ongoing reforms of market organisations will not be affected initially but their outcome will subsequently be incorporated into the regulation.
It is proposed that the provisions in the proposed regulation enter into force in such a way as to ensure a smooth transition to the new rules.
It is proposed that the provisions in the proposed regulation enter into force in such a way as to ensure a smooth transition to the new rules.
A total of 41 regulations can be repealed when this common market organisation takes effect.
A total of 41 regulations can be repealed when this common market organisation takes effect.
Simplification of the common agricultural policy
Simplification of the common agricultural policy
With this proposal, the Commission has embarked on an ambitious and laudable project.
With this proposal, the Commission has embarked on an ambitious and laudable project.
Even though it does not immediately appear to be an obvious simplification for all those who up to now have had to deal with only one or just a few market organisations, it will presumably, and hopefully, rapidly turn out to be a simplification after a period of familiarisation.
Even though it does not immediately appear to be an obvious simplification for all those who up to now have had to deal with only one or just a few market organisations, it will presumably, and hopefully, rapidly turn out to be a simplification after a period of familiarisation.
For those using several of the sector-specific market organisations or wanting an overview of the various market organisations, this consolidated set of rules is a welcome aid.
For those using several of the sector-specific market organisations or wanting an overview of the various market organisations, this consolidated set of rules is a welcome aid.
This legislative package constitutes the regulatory framework for the agricultural industry and the overriding aim should be to create clarity around this regulatory framework in such a way that it is also perceived as a simplification by those for whom this legislation is designed.
This legislative package constitutes the regulatory framework for the agricultural industry and the overriding aim should be to create clarity around this regulatory framework in such a way that it is also perceived as a simplification by those for whom this legislation is designed.
The Commission has given repeated assurances that only technical changes are involved and that simplification must not be seen as an attempt to change underlying policy.
The Commission has given repeated assurances that only technical changes are involved and that simplification must not be seen as an attempt to change underlying policy.
Nevertheless, the Commission has proposed removing the option of public intervention for pigmeat on the admirable grounds that the scheme has not been used for three decades but, in so doing, the Commission is embarking on policy changes.
Nevertheless, the Commission has proposed removing the option of public intervention for pigmeat on the admirable grounds that the scheme has not been used for three decades but, in so doing, the Commission is embarking on policy changes.
In order to confer maximum credibility on the Commission’s exclusively technical intentions, the rapporteur believes that the intervention scheme for pigmeat should be retained so that the changes in this proposal remain exclusively of a technical nature.
In order to confer maximum credibility on the Commission’s exclusively technical intentions, the rapporteur believes that the intervention scheme for pigmeat should be retained so that the changes in this proposal remain exclusively of a technical nature.
A single basic regulation
A single basic regulation
When all sectoral regulations are to be combined in one single basic regulation, it is a logical consequence that the sectoral regulations that are currently being reformed and that are excluded from this proposal should be incorporated once the reforms have been completed.
When all sectoral regulations are to be combined in one single basic regulation, it is a logical consequence that the sectoral regulations that are currently being reformed and that are excluded from this proposal should be incorporated once the reforms have been completed.
It ought therefore to be unnecessary to anticipate outcomes and incorporate parts of the reform prematurely.
It ought therefore to be unnecessary to anticipate outcomes and incorporate parts of the reform prematurely.
Transferral of powers from the Council to the Commission
Transferral of powers from the Council to the Commission
The Commission proposes that certain provisions in the existing Council regulations are so technical in nature that it is not deemed appropriate for the Council to retain regulatory powers.
The Commission proposes that certain provisions in the existing Council regulations are so technical in nature that it is not deemed appropriate for the Council to retain regulatory powers.
In respect of these provisions it is proposed that regulatory competence be transferred to the Commission assisted by a management committee.
In respect of these provisions it is proposed that regulatory competence be transferred to the Commission assisted by a management committee.
These are technical provisions concerning such technical details as terms of contract, notification and disclosure requirements concerning sectoral agreements, listing of products subject to private storage, etc., which the Council has up to now been able to adopt without first consulting the European Parliament (‘second-generation acts’).
These are technical provisions concerning such technical details as terms of contract, notification and disclosure requirements concerning sectoral agreements, listing of products subject to private storage, etc., which the Council has up to now been able to adopt without first consulting the European Parliament (‘second-generation acts’).
Insofar as these are solely provisions of a purely technical nature, the rapporteur feels it is reasonable to transfer regulatory competence to the Commission which can take decisions swiftly and effectively.
Insofar as these are solely provisions of a purely technical nature, the rapporteur feels it is reasonable to transfer regulatory competence to the Commission which can take decisions swiftly and effectively.
Any decision of a political nature must continue to be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 37 of the Treaty after consulting the European Parliament.
Any decision of a political nature must continue to be adopted in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 37 of the Treaty after consulting the European Parliament.
Establishment of a single management committee
Establishment of a single management committee
Following up the proposed simplification, the Commission further proposes that there should be only one management committee.
Following up the proposed simplification, the Commission further proposes that there should be only one management committee.
By way of follow-up to the most recent reform of the common agricultural policy it seems sensible to cut the number of management committees when consolidating the existing set of rules, but cutting the number to one single management committee raises doubts as to how it is possible at the same time to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
By way of follow-up to the most recent reform of the common agricultural policy it seems sensible to cut the number of management committees when consolidating the existing set of rules, but cutting the number to one single management committee raises doubts as to how it is possible at the same time to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
The Commission does not explain satisfactorily in the proposal how a single management committee can achieve the necessary sectoral expertise and operate in practice.
The Commission does not explain satisfactorily in the proposal how a single management committee can achieve the necessary sectoral expertise and operate in practice.
There is a major difference between the market mechanisms that apply within the various sectors and it must therefore be a minimum requirement to operate with at least two management committees divided up into a committee for animal products and one for vegetable products.
There is a major difference between the market mechanisms that apply within the various sectors and it must therefore be a minimum requirement to operate with at least two management committees divided up into a committee for animal products and one for vegetable products.
Within these two main areas there is also such great variety that very serious thought ought to be given to whether there is a need to operate with more than just two management committees.
Within these two main areas there is also such great variety that very serious thought ought to be given to whether there is a need to operate with more than just two management committees.
Furthermore, it should be ensured that the management committees are assisted by the necessary sectoral expertise from the Member States and the Commission.
Furthermore, it should be ensured that the management committees are assisted by the necessary sectoral expertise from the Member States and the Commission.
The Commission should produce an evaluation of this issue in two years’ time and it should then be possible to modify the number of management committees and the way their work is organised if this is deemed necessary, not least to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
The Commission should produce an evaluation of this issue in two years’ time and it should then be possible to modify the number of management committees and the way their work is organised if this is deemed necessary, not least to ensure that the necessary sectoral expertise is available.
Organizarea comună a pieţelor din sectorul agricol
Common organisation of agricultural markets
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru ocuparea forţei de muncă şi afaceri sociale 17
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............16
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru mediu, sănătate publică şi siguranţă alimentară 24
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 22
– având în vedere articolele 16, 49 şi 50, articolul 95 alineatul (1) şi articolul 152 din Tratatul CE,
– having regard to Articles 16, 49, 50, 95(1) and 152 of the EC Treaty,
– având în vedere articolul 35 din Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene,
– having regard to Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
I-1931. , din 12 iulie 2001 în cauzele C-157/99, Geraets-Smits şi Peerbooms
I-1931. , of 12 July 2001 in Cases C-157/99, Geraets-Smits and Peerbooms
I-5473. şi C-368/98, Vanbraekel şi alţii
I-5473. and C-368/98, Vanbraekel and others
I-5363. , din 25 februarie 2003 în cauza C-326/00, IKA
I-5363. , of 25 February 2003 in Case C-326/00, IKA
I-1703. , din 13 mai 2003 în cauza C-385/99, Müller-Fauré şi Van Riet
I-1703. , of 13 May 2003 in Case C-385/99, Müller-Fauré and Van Riet
I-4509. , din 23 octombrie 2003 în cauza C-56/01, Inizan
I-4509. , of 23 October 2003 in Case C-56/01, Inizan
I-12403. , din 18 martie 2004 în cauza C-8/02, Leichtle
I-12403. , of 18 March 2004 in Case C-8/02, Leichtle
I-2641. şi din 16 mai 2005 în cauza C-372/04, Watts
I-2641. , and of 16 May 2005 in Case C-372/04, Watts
– având în vedere Directiva 2006/123/CE a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului din 12 decembrie 2006 privind serviciile pe piaţa internă
– having regard to Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market
JO L 376 din 27.12.2006, p.
OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p.
36. şi în special articolul 2 alineatul (2) litera (f) şi considerentele 22 şi 23,
36. , in particular Article 2(2)(f), and recitals 22 and 23,
– având în vedere comunicarea Comisiei din 26 septembrie 2006 intitulată „Consultarea cu privire la acţiunea comunitară în domeniul serviciilor de sănătate”,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 26 September 2006 entitled ‘Consultation regarding Community action on health care services’ ( SEC(2006)1195 /4),
– având în vedere rezoluţia sa din 9 iunie 2005 privind mobilitatea pacienţilor şi evoluţia îngrijirilor medicale în cadrul Uniunii Europene
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union
JO C 124 E din 25.5.2006, p.
OJ C 124E, 25.5.2006, p.
– având în vedere concluziile Consiliului privind valorile şi principiile comune ale sistemelor de sănătate din Uniunea Europeană
– having regard to the Council Conclusions on common values and principles in European Union health systems
JO L 149 din 5.7.1971, p.
OJ L 149, 5.7.1971, p.
883/2004 al Parlamentului European şi al Consiliului din 29 aprilie 2004 privind coordonarea sistemelor de asigurare socială
2. , European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) 883/2004 on coordination of social security systems
– având în vedere raportul Comisiei pentru piaţa internă şi protecţia consumatorilor şi avizele Comisiei pentru ocuparea forţei de muncă şi afaceri sociale şi ale Comisiei pentru mediu, sănătate publică şi siguranţă alimentară( A6-0173/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0173/2007 ),
A. întrucât statele membre sunt responsabile pentru organizarea, gestionarea, furnizarea şi finanţarea sistemelor de sănătate publică, care diferă în funcţie de stat;
A. whereas the Member States are responsible for organising, managing, delivering and financing health-care systems, which are different in every Member State,
B. întrucât Curtea de Justiţie a Comunităţilor Europene a pronunţat o serie de hotărâri, precum cele privind aspectele accesului la asistenţa medicală, stabilirea criteriilor pentru procedurile în vederea autorizării prealabile sau pentru rambursarea costurilor, autorizând cetăţenii UE să se deplaseze liber pentru a obţine asistenţă medicală în alt stat membru;
B. whereas the Court of Justice of the European Communities has handed down a number of judgments, such as on the issues of access to health care, the settlement of criteria for prior authorisation procedures or for reimbursement of costs, and authorising EU citizens to move freely in order to find health care in another Member State,
C. întrucât, în concluziile sale din 1 şi 2 iunie 2006, Consiliul a adoptat o declaraţie a celor 25 de miniştri ai sănătăţii din Uniunea Europeană
C. whereas, in its conclusions of 1 to 2 June 2006, the Council adopted a statement by the 25 Health Ministers of the European Union about the common values and principles that underpin Europe’s health systems
JO C 146, 22.6.2006, p.
OJ C 146, 22.6.2006, p.
JO L 40 din 11.2.1989, p.8 privind transparenţa, pentru a accelera termenele de introducere pe piaţă a medicamentelor, a susţine inovaţia şi siguranţa medicamentelor şi a promova utilizarea unei proceduri centralizate de autorizare a introducerii pe piaţă;
8. on transparency should be better applied, so that medicines would be placed on the market more quickly, innovation and safety of medicines would be supported and use of the centralised procedure for marketing authorisation more strongly promoted;
15. subliniază că pacienţii ar trebui să aibă acces la informaţiile pe baza cărora furnizorii de asistenţă medicală au obţinut acreditare internaţională şi că furnizorii de asistenţă medicală acreditaţi ar trebui, indiferent de statul membru în care se află, să asigure, pe baza unor indicatori de calitate măsurabili, recunoscuţi pe plan internaţional, că serviciile medicale sunt sigure;
Points out that patients should have access to information on which the health-care provider has obtained international accreditation and that the accredited providers of the health care should, regardless of where they are in the EU, ensure that health care is safe, based on measurable international indicators of quality;
25. observă marea diversitate a mobilităţii în rândul pacienţilor trimişi în străinătate de sistemul lor naţional de sănătate şi al pacienţilor care solicită tratament medical în străinătate din proprie iniţiativă, al turiştilor care se îmbolnăvesc, al lucrătorilor migranţi, studenţilor, pensionarilor, precum şi al tuturor persoanelor rezidente în altă ţară a Uniunii decât ţara lor de origine, sau care trăiesc în regiuni transfrontaliere;
Notes the great diversity of mobility and the different reasons for mobility among patients sent abroad by their national health system and of patients looking for medical treatment abroad of their own volition – tourists who fall ill, migrant workers, students, retired people and anyone living in an EU country other than their country of origin, or living in border regions – and stresses that those differences should be taken into account when designing policy;
27. solicită Comisiei furnizarea de statistici anuale pentru fiecare stat membru în ceea ce priveşte mobilitatea pacienţilor, precum şi numărul şi motivele refuzării rambursării;
Calls on the Commission to provide annual statistics for each Member State on patient mobility and on the number of cases of reimbursement being refused, and the reasons for such refusal;
30. constată accesul dificil al pacienţilor la informaţii clare şi precise referitoare la serviciile de sănătate, în special în ceea ce priveşte serviciile de sănătate transfrontaliere şi complexitatea procedurile de urmat; constată că această dificultate, care nu este creată doar de bariere lingvistice, sporeşte riscul la adresa siguranţei pacientului;
Notes how difficult it is for patients to obtain clear and precise information on health care, especially in relation to cross-border health care, and the complexity of the procedures that have to be followed; notes that this difficulty, which is not only created by language barriers, potentially increases the risk to patient safety;
37. solicită punerea în aplicare a unui sistem de referinţă european în ceea ce priveşte rambursarea, pentru a permite cetăţenilor să compare şi să facă cea mai potrivită alegere;
Calls for a European reference scheme to be put in place concerning reimbursement in order to allow citizens to make a comparison and to make the most suitable choice of the treatment for them;
883/2004; solicită un nivel înalt de protecţie a datelor pentru pacienţi în ceea ce priveşte cooperarea transfrontalieră în domeniul serviciilor de sănătate, pentru a asigura confidenţialitatea datelor medicale sensibile;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that health service providers post a clearly visible symbol demonstrating (in a similar way as with credit cards in hotels, restaurants, etc.) that a patient’s EHIC can be accepted in a given Member State, in line with Regulation (EC) No 883/2004; calls for a high level of data protection for patients as regards cross-border cooperation in health services in order to ensure confidentiality of sensitive medical data;
42. subliniază că articolul 35 din Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene prevede că Uniunea asigură un nivel ridicat de protecţie a sănătăţii şi atrage atenţia, în acest sens, asupra faptului că calitatea serviciilor de sănătate şi capacitatea acestui sector de a reţine forţa de muncă sunt condiţionate de calitatea muncii şi de condiţiile de muncă ale celor care lucrează în domeniul serviciilor de sănătate, incluzând timpul de odihnă şi oportunităţile de formare profesională; subliniază, de asemenea, că măsurile adiţionale, cum ar fi controlul calităţii, monitorizarea şi utilizarea noilor tehnologii ale informaţiei ar trebui să asigure tratamente medicale optime pentru pacienţi;
Stresses that Article 35 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides that the Union shall ensure a high level of health protection and in this regard points out that the quality of health services and the ability of the sector to retain staff are conditioned by the quality of the work and the working conditions of health-service workers, including rest times and training opportunities; points out further that accompanying measures such as quality control, supervision and the use of new information technologies should ensure the best possible medical care for the patients;