natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
referitor la propunerea de regulament al Parlamentului European şi al Consiliului de stabilire a unor proceduri de aplicare a anumitor reguli tehnice naţionale pentru produsele comercializate în mod legal într-un alt stat membru şi de abrogare a Deciziei 3052/95/CE
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation laying down procedures relating to the application of certain national technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Decision 3052/95/EC
En vertu des articles 28 et 30 du traité, les États membres de destination ne peuvent pas interdire la vente sur leurs territoires de produits qui sont commercialisés légalement dans un autre État membre et qui ne sont pas soumis à une harmonisation communautaire, à moins que les restrictions techniques fixées par l’État membre de destination ne soient justifiées par les motifs visés à l’article 30 du traité CE ou sur la base de nécessités impérieuses d’importance publique générale reconnues par la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice, et qu’elles soient proportionnelles.
Under Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty Member States of destination cannot forbid the sale on their territories of products which are lawfully marketed in another Member State and which are not subject to Community harmonisation, unless the technical restrictions laid down by the Member State of destination are justified on the grounds described in Article 30 of the EC Treaty, or on the basis of overriding requirements of general public importance recognised by the Court of Justice's case law, and are proportionate.
Il s’agit du «principe de reconnaissance mutuelle».
This is the so-called 'principle of mutual recognition'.
La mise en œuvre de ce principe est mise à mal par plusieurs problèmes: i) les entreprises et les autorités nationales n’ont pas été suffisamment sensibilisées à l’existence du principe de reconnaissance mutuelle; ii) le champ d’application du principe et la charge de la preuve font l’objet d’une incertitude juridique car il n’est pas toujours clair de déterminer à quelles catégories de produit la reconnaissance mutuelle s’applique; iii) les entreprises risquent que leurs produits n'aient pas accès au marché de l’État membre de destination; iv) il n’y a pas de dialogue régulier entre les autorités compétentes dans les différents États membres.
The implementation of this principle is hampered by several problems: (i) the lack of awareness of enterprises and national authorities about the existence of the mutual recognition principle; (ii) the legal uncertainty about the scope of the principle and the burden of proof, because it is often unclear to which categories of product mutual recognition applies; (iii) the risk for enterprises that their products will not get access to the market of the Member State of destination; (iv) the absence of regular dialogues between competent authorities in different Member States.
Il est donc nécessaire d’établir des procédures permettant d’éviter que des règles techniques nationales ne créent des obstacles illégaux à la libre circulation des biens entre les États membres.
It is therefore necessary to lay down procedures to ensure that national technical rules do not create illegal barriers to the free movement of goods between Member States.
Le rapporteur a apporté des modifications à la proposition de règlement afin de rendre sa portée plus évidente, d'améliorer l'accès aux informations de la part des opérateurs économiques et de faciliter la tâche de contrôle de la Commission européenne.
The draftsman has made changes to the proposal for a regulation in order to make its scope clearer, to improve access to information for economic operators and to make the Commission's task of monitoring easier.
Les amendements visent aussi à responsabiliser l'exécutif communautaire: en tant que gardienne des Traités, elle a le devoir d'exercer son devoir de contrôle d'une manière plus active.
The amendments also seek to increase the responsibility of the Community's executive arm: as the guardian of the Treaties, it has a duty to exercise its monitoring role more actively.
Comisia pentru afaceri juridice recomandă Comisiei pentru piaţa internă şi protecţia consumatorilor, competentă în fond, să includă în raportul său următoarele amendamente:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunităţii Europene, în special articolele 37 şi 95,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 37 and 95 thereof,
având în vedere Tratatul de instituire a Comunităţii Europene, în special articolul 95,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
(1) Piaţa internă cuprinde o zonă fără frontiere interne, în care libera circulaţie a mărfurilor este asigurată în baza tratatului, care interzice măsurile al căror efect este echivalent cu restricţiile cantitative pentru importuri.
(1) The internal market comprises an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods is ensured under the Treaty, which prohibits measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports.
La phrase en question a été remplacée par les considérants 1 bis et 1 ter, qui précisent l'interdiction de toute mesure nationale susceptible de porter atteinte, directement ou indirectement, réellement ou potentiellement, aux échanges intracommunautaires.
This sentence has been replaced by Recitals 1a and 1b, which spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
(1a) Orice reglementare comercială a statelor membre care poate constitui un obstacol, direct sau indirect, efectiv sau potenţial, în calea comerţului intracomunitar, trebuie considerată drept măsură cu efect echivalent restricţiilor cantitative asupra importurilor şi, ca atare, interzisă de articolul 28 din tratat.
(1a) Any trade rules in the Member States which are capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, have to be deemed to be a measure having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports and, accordingly, are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
De asemenea, normele ce reglementează nediferenţiat produsele naţionale şi importate şi a căror aplicare este susceptibilă să diminueze volumul de desfacere al acestora constituie, în principiu, măsuri cu efect echivalent, interzise de articolul 28 din tratat.
Thus, standards which are applicable without distinction to national and imported products and the application of which is likely to reduce their volume of sales also constitute, in principle, measures having equivalent effect which are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
La procédure prévue dans la proposition de règlement constitue une exception au principe de la reconnaissance mutuelle.
The procedure laid down in the proposal for a regulation represents an exception to the principle of mutual recognition.
L'objet des considérants 1 bis et 1 ter est de préciser l'interdiction de toute mesure nationale susceptible de porter atteinte, directement ou indirectement, réellement ou potentiellement, aux échanges intracommunautaires.
The purpose of Recitals 1a and 1b is to spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
Ils constituent une mise à garde basée sur la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice
They constitute a warning directed at the Member States, based on the case law of the Court of Justice
Voir, notamment, les arrêts du 11 juillet 1974 Dassonville, 8/74, Rec. p.
See, in particular, the judgments of 11 July 1974, Dassonville, 8/74, ECR p.
837, point 5, du 19 juin 2003, Commission/Italie, C-420/01, Rec. p.
837, paragraph 5; 19 June 2003, Commission v Italy, C-420/01, ECR p.
I-6445, point 25, du 26 mai 2005 Burmanjer e.a., C-20/03, Rec. p.
I-6445, paragraph 25; 26 May 2005, Burmanjer and others, C-20/3, ECR p.
I-4133, point 23, et du 20 février 1979 Rewe-Zentral "Cassis de Dijon", 120/78, Rec.
I-4133, paragraph 23; and 20 February 1979 Rewe-Zentral 'Cassis de Dijon', 120/78, ECR p.
(1b) Conform Curţii de Justiţie, un sistem care ar continua să impună licenţe de import sau orice alt procedeu similar, chiar de o manieră pur formală, contravine, în principiu, articolului 30 din tratat.
(1b) According to the Court of Justice a system which maintains the requirement, even a purely formal one, for import licences or any other similar procedure is, in principle, contrary to Article 30 of the Treaty.
Într-adevăr, impunerea unor formalităţi la import ca parte a unui sistem de autorizaţii cu caracter preventiv este susceptibilă să creeze obstacole în calea comerţului intracomunitar şi a accesului pe piaţă al produselor fabricate şi comercializate legal în alte state membre.
The fact of imposing import formalities which create a system of preventive authorisation is actually capable of hindering intra-Community trade and of hindering market access for products which are lawfully manufactured and marketed in other Member States.
Obstacolele create sunt cu atât mai grave atunci când, din cauza acestui sistem, costurile aferente produselor respective cresc.
The obstacle is even more serious if the system exposes the products concerned to additional costs.
În astfel de circumstanţe, nu este vorba de o simplă limitare sau de o simplă interzicere a anumitor modalităţi de comercializare.
In such circumstances this is not a simple restriction or simple prohibition of certain sales arrangements.
Impunerea unei autorizaţii cu caracter preventiv trebuie, prin urmare, să fie considerată drept un obstacol ce afectează comerţul dintre statele membre şi intră sub incidenţa articolului 28 din tratat.
The fact of imposing preventive authorisation must therefore be considered to constitute a barrier to trade between the Member States which falls within the scope of Article 28 of the Treaty.
Voir les arrêts du 8 février 1983, Commission/Royaume-Uni, dit "lait UHT", 124/81, Rec . p .
See the judgments of 8 February 1983, Commission v United Kingdom, known as 'UHT milk', 124/81, ECR p.
203, point 9, et du 5 juillet 1990, Commission/Belgique, C-304/88, Rec.
203, paragraph 9 and 5 July 1990, Commission v Belgium, C-304/88, ECR p.
I-2801, point 9; voir aussi l'arrêt du 26 Mai 2005, Commission/France, C-212/03, Rec.
I-2801, paragraph 9; see also the judgment of 26 May 2005, Commission v France, C-212/03, ECR p.
I-4213, point 16, et l'arrêt du 23 octobre 1977, Franzén, C-189/95, Rec.
I-4213, paragraph 16, and the judgment of 23 October 1977, Franzén, C-189/95, ECR p.
5909, point 71. et adressée aux Etats membres.
5909, paragraph 71. .
(2) Obstacolele în calea liberei circulaţii a mărfurilor între statele membre pot fi create ilegal de autorităţile naţionale, în lipsa armonizării legislaţiei, ca o consecinţă a aplicării, pentru bunurile provenite din alte state membre, unde sunt comercializate în mod legal, a unor reguli tehnice care prevăd cerinţe impuse pentru aceste bunuri , legate de denumirea, forma, mărimea, greutatea, compoziţia, modul de prezentare, etichetarea şi ambalarea produselor.
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the national authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such goods, such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling and packaging.
(2) În lipsa armonizării legislaţiei, statele membre pot crea în mod ilegal obstacole pentru libera circulaţie a mărfurilor între statele membre aplicând bunurilor provenite din alte state membre, unde sunt comercializate în mod legal, reguli tehnice care condiţionează comercializarea acestor bunuri de respectarea anumitor cerinţe, legate de denumirea, forma, mărimea, greutatea, compoziţia, modul de prezentare, etichetarea şi ambalarea produselor.
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the national authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such goods, such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling and packaging.
La dernière phrase de ce considérant est couverte par les nouveaux considérants 1 bis et 1 ter.
The final sentence of this recital is covered by the new Recitals 1a and 1b.
(7a) Directiva 98/34/CE a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului din 22 iunie 1998, care prevede o procedură de informare în domeniul normelor şi al regulilor tehnice şi al regulilor privind serviciile societăţii informaţionale 1 , obligă statele membre să comunice Comisiei şi celorlalte state membre orice proiect de regulă tehnică privind produsele industriale fabricate şi produsele agricole, inclusiv cele pescăreşti şi să adreseze Comisiei o notificare în care să prezinte motivele pentru care este necesară stabilirea unei astfel de reguli tehnice.
(7a) Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services 1 obliges Member States to communicate to the Commission and the other Member States any draft technical rules concerning industrially manufactured products and agricultural (including fish) products and a statement of the grounds which make the enactment of such technical rules necessary.
Cu toate acestea, trebuie să se garanteze că, după adoptarea unei reguli tehnice naţionale, principiul recunoaşterii reciproce este corect aplicat în cazuri speciale şi pentru produse specifice.
It is necessary, however, to ensure that, following the adoption of a national technical rule, the principle of mutual recognition is correctly applied in individual cases to specific products.
Prezentul regulament stabileşte o procedură pentru aplicarea principiului recunoaşterii reciproce în cazuri speciale, care prevede că autorităţile naţionale sunt obligate să justifice motivele tehnice sau ştiinţifice care nu permit autorizarea produsului specific în forma sa actuală pe piaţa naţională în temeiul articolelor 28 şi 30 din tratat.
This Regulation lays down a procedure for the application of the principle of mutual recognition in individual cases, through the obligation for the national authorities to specify the technical or scientific grounds on which the specific product in its current form cannot be authorised on the national market, in accordance with Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty.
În cadrul prezentului regulament, autorităţile naţionale nu sunt obligate să justifice regula tehnică în sine.
National authorities are not required under this Regulation to state the grounds for the technical rule itself.
Directivă, astfel cum a fost modificată ultima dată prin Directiva 2006/96/CE a Consiliului (JO L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
Directive last amended by Council Directive 2006/96/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
(8a) Ar trebui să se facă o distincţie între obligaţia de a furniza consumatorului anumite informaţii privind produsul prin inscripţionarea unor specificaţii pe acesta sau prin alăturarea unor documente cum ar fi instrucţiunile de utilizare, pe de o parte, şi, pe de altă parte, obligaţia de a furniza aceste informaţii într-o anume limbă.
(8a) A distinction must be drawn between the obligation to provide the consumer with specific information concerning the product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending to it documents such as instructions for use, and the obligation to provide such information in a given language.
Acesta este motivul pentru care obligaţia de a furniza anumite informaţii privind produsul prin inscripţionarea unor specificaţii pe acesta sau prin alăturarea unor documente constituie o „regulă tehnică” în sensul prezentului regulament, în timp ce obligaţia de a oferi specificaţiile obligatorii de pe etichetă şi instrucţiunile de utilizare în limba sau limbile zonei în care produsele sunt comercializate nu constituie o „regulă tehnică” în sensul prezentului regulament.
This is why the obligation to provide specific information concerning a product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending documents to it constitutes a 'technical rule' for the purposes of this Regulation, whereas the obligation to provide mandatory labelling information and instructions for use at least in the language(s) of the area in which those products are to be marketed does not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
Ce considérant est justifié par le souci d'assurer à la fois une bonne information des opérateurs et des consommateurs mais aussi pour clarifier le champ d'application du présent règlement conformément à la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice.
The reason for this recital is the concern not only to ensure proper information for operators and consumers but also to clarify the scope of this regulation in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice.
Dans son arrêt COLIM NV (C-33/97), la Cour de Justice a en effet précisé ce qui relevait ou non de la notion de "règle technique", ce qui doit donc être clarifié dans un considérant pour une bonne application du présent règlement.
In its COLIM NV judgment (C-33/97) the Court of Justice spelled out what was and was not covered by the idea of a 'technical rule', and this must therefore be clarified in a recital so as to ensure the satisfactory application of this regulation.
(8b) Procedurile de autorizare prealabilă nu constituie o regulă tehnică în sensul prezentului regulament.
(8b) Procedures entailing prior authorisation do not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
Il existe des procédures d'autorisation de mise sur le marché de produits qui sont nationales (produits médicaux).
There are national procedures for authorising the marketing of products (medical products).
Or d'après le droit communautaire, pour toutes procédures d'autorisation préalable, il n'y a pas d'obligation d'avoir une période de standstill et le présent règlement ne s'applique donc pas.
Under Community law, where any prior authorisation procedure is concerned there is no obligation to have a standstill period, and this regulation therefore does not apply.
(9) Directiva 2001/95/CE a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului din 3 decembrie 2001 privind siguranţa generală a produselor, menţionează faptul că numai produsele sigure pot fi introduse pe piaţă .
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be placed on the market .
În consecinţă, este necesară excluderea din sfera de aplicare a prezentului regulament a măsurilor adoptate de autorităţile naţionale , în temeiul legislaţiei naţionale de punere în aplicare a Directivei 2001/95/CE.
It is necessary, therefore, to exclude from the scope of this Regulation measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Directive 2001/95/EC.
(9) Directiva 2001/95/CE a Parlamentului European şi a Consiliului din 3 decembrie 2001 privind siguranţa generală a produselor, menţionează faptul că numai produsele sigure pot fi commercializate et stabileşte obligaţiile producătorilor şi distribuitorilor în materie de siguranţă a produselor .
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be marketed, and lays down the obligations of producers and distributors with regard to product safety .
În sensul prezentei directive, în cazul în care produsele prezintă riscuri majore, autorităţile sunt, de asemenea, abilitate să întreprindă în timp util acţiunile necesare pentru luarea măsurilor adecvate, cum ar fi cele vizate la articolul 8 alineatul (1) literele (b)-(f) din directiva amintită.
Under that Directive the authorities are also entitled to take the requisite steps so as to apply appropriate measures, such as those referred to in Article 8(1)(b)-(f) of the Directive, with the requisite speed in cases where products pose a serious risk.
În consecinţă, ar trebui excluse din sfera de aplicare a prezentului regulament măsurile adoptate de autorităţile naţionale în temeiul legislaţiei naţionale de punere în aplicare a articolului 8 alineatul (1) literele (b)-(f) şi alineatul (3) din Directiva 2001/95/CE.
Measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Article 8(1)(d)-(f) and Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/95/EC should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation .
Cet amendement précise le contenu de la directive 2001/95/CE sur la sécurité des produits.
This amendment clarifies the content of Directive 2001/95/EC on product safety.
Il est nécessaire de mentionner l'article 54 du règlement n°178/2002 qui prévoit des mesures d'urgence de retrait du marché en cas de carence de la Commission en matière de sécurité alimentaire.
It is necessary to refer to Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, which provides for emergency measures to withdraw products from the market in the event of the Commission failing to act with regard to food safety.
(11a) Prezentul regulament nu aduce atingere directivelor comunitare de armonizare a măsurilor ce au ca scop protecţia sănătăţii umane, animale sau vegetale şi de instituire a unor proceduri de control al respectării acestor măsuri.
(11a) This Regulation is without prejudice to Community directives which harmonise measures concerning the protection of human, animal or plant health and which lay down procedures for monitoring compliance with such measures.
Il existe une procédure spécifique en matière de protection de l'homme, des animaux et en matière phytosanitaire qui continue de s'appliquer car les contrôles sont déjà harmonisés au sein de l'Union européenne.
There is a specific procedure concerning the protection of human, animal and plant health which continues to apply, because monitoring is already harmonised within the European Union.
Toute procédure spécifique ayant été harmonisée est exlue du champ d'application de la proposition de règlement (voir l'arrêt C 249/92) et échappe donc aux règles de l'inversion de la charge de la preuve, à la période de standstill etc.
Any specific procedure which has already been harmonised is excluded from the scope of the proposal for a regulation (see judgment C-249/92) and is thus not covered by the rules concerning the inversion of the burden of proof, the standstill period, etc.
(14) Autorităţii naţionale îi revine responsabilitatea de a demonstra în fiecare caz faptul că aplicarea regulilor tehnice naţionale produselor specifice, comercializate în mod legal în alte state membre, se încadrează în excepţiile permise.
(14) It is for the national authority to show in each case that the application of national technical rules to specific products lawfully marketed in another Member State falls within the permitted exceptions.
(14) Autorităţii naţionale îi revine responsabilitatea de a demonstra în fiecare caz faptul că aplicarea regulilor tehnice naţionale produselor specifice, comercializate în mod legal în alte state membre, se încadrează în excepţiile permise şi că nu se poate recurge la măsuri mai puţin restrictive .
(14) It is for the national authority to show in each case that the application of national technical rules to specific products lawfully marketed in another Member State falls within the permitted exceptions and that less restrictive measures cannot be used.