natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
347. constată că CCE a criticat absența unei strategii cuprinzătoare de evaluare; în acest context, subliniază îmbunătățirile aduse de evaluarea de impact și evaluarea ex-ante a celui de-al 7-lea Program-cadru de CDT
347.Notices that the ECA criticized the absence of a comprehensive evaluation strategy; points in this context to the improvements introduced by the impact assessment and ex-ante evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme
348. ia act de critica CCE conform căreia mecanismele existente de coordonare între direcțiile generale care realizează programele-cadru de CDT nu sunt eficiente; rămâne însă, în această etapă, circumspect față de ideea creării unui „birou comun de evaluare”; sugerează, mai degrabă, ca Direcția Generală Cercetare să își asume o responsabilitate mai mare și un rol de coordonare; împărtășește opinia CCE conform căreia avizele experților externi ar trebui elaborate într-o etapă mai timpurie și ar trebui păstrate ca garanție pentru o abordare consecventă și coerentă, în special ținând seama de faptul că sunt programate evaluări pentru 2008 (evaluarea ex-post a celui de-al 6-lea Program-cadru de CDT), pentru 2009 (raport factual intermediar privind cel de-al 7-lea Program-cadru de CDT), pentru 2010 (evaluarea la jumătatea perioadei pentru cel de-al 7-lea Program-cadru de CDT) și pentru 2015 (evaluarea ex-post a celui de-al 7-lea Program-cadru de CDT);
348.Acknowledges the ECA's criticism that the existing coordination mechanisms among directorates general implementing the RTD framework programmes were not effective; remains however, at this stage, unconvinced by the idea of creating a "joint evaluation office"; suggests rather that the Directorate General for Research assume more responsibility and a coordinating role; shares the ECA's view that external expert advice should be established at an early stage and remain in place to guarantee a consistent and coherent approach, in particular as evaluations are scheduled for 2008 (ex-post evaluation of the 6th RTD framework programme), for 2009 (factual interim report on the 7th RTD framework programme), for 2010 (mid-term evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme) and for 2015 (ex-post evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme);
349. ia act de remarca CCE conform căreia orientările metodologice furnizate au fost inadecvate; prin urmare, solicită Comisiei să ia în considerare publicarea unui manual de evaluare; este la curent cu faptul că cerințele de raportare au fost revizuite pentru cel de-al 7-lea Program-cadru de CDT în vederea creării unei baze de date mai solide pentru evaluare și monitorizare;
349.Notes the ECA's remark that inadequate methodological guidance was provided; calls therefore on the Commission to consider publishing an evaluation manual; is aware that the reporting requirements were revised under the 7th RTD framework programme with a view to creating a more robust data base for evaluation and monitoring;
350. consideră că calitatea evaluărilor la jumătatea perioadei și a evaluărilor ex-post se va îmbunătăți odată cu clarificarea termenilor de referință puși la dispoziție (obiective măsurabile, impactul preconizat, monitorizare eficientă, o bază de date solidă); subliniază că evaluările vor fi mai utile dacă programele cadru devin adaptabile (programe „care învață”) și că concluziile trase pot fi utilizate pentru îmbunătățirea programelor în curs;
350.Is of the opinion that the quality of the mid-term and ex-post evaluations will improve the clearer the terms of reference which are provided (i.e. measurable objectives, expected impact, effective monitoring, a sound data base); emphasises that evaluations will be more useful if framework programmes are adaptable ("learning" programmes) and conclusions drawn can be used to improve ongoing programmes;
351. invită Comisia să țină seama de recomandările CCE la realizarea evaluărilor programate pentru 2008, 2009, 2010 și 2014;
351.Calls on the Commission to bear in mind the recommendations of the ECA when carrying out the scheduled evaluations in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2014;
352. invită CCE să își încheie auditul la timp pentru procedura de descărcare de gestiune 2010 și să prezinte un raport în acest sens Comisiei pentru control bugetar; solicită CCE să analizeze, de asemenea, raportul dintre sumele cheltuite cu evaluările și valoarea programelor specifice și să compare valoarea obținută cu cea aferentă altor programe de CDT din țări terțe (de exemplu, din Canada).
352.Calls on the ECA to follow-up its audit in time for the 2010 discharge exercise and to report back to the Committee on Budgetary Control; asks the ECA to also look at the amounts spent on evaluations in relation to the value of specific programmes and at how this percentage relates to other RTD programmes in third countries (e.g. Canada).
AVIZUL Comisiei pentru afaceri externe
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
Raportoare pentru aviz: Véronique De Keyser
Draftswoman: Véronique De Keyser
Comisia pentru afaceri externe recomandă Comisiei pentru control bugetar, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Asistența de preaderare
Pre-accession assistance
6. salută excepționala contribuție a Agenției Europene pentru Reconstrucție la dezvoltarea și consolidarea stabilității în regiune; își exprimă încă o dată sprijinul pentru decizia de a închide agenția în 2008, pentru ca asistența acordată țărilor eligibile să poată fi gestionată de delegațiile Comisiei în acele țări;
Welcomes the excellent contribution made by the European Agency for Reconstruction to the development and consolidation of stability in the region; reiterates its support for the decision to wind down the Agency by 2008 in order that assistance to eligible countries may be managed by Commission delegations in those countries;
7. se declară mulțumit de constatarea Curții conform căreia Comisia a introdus mai multe măsuri de remediere ca urmare a raportului special al Curții din 2003 referitor la programele de înfrățire; invită Comisia să motiveze mai mult guvernele beneficiare să utilizeze rezultatele proiectelor desfășurate în contextul eforturilor lor de reformă; sprijină recomandarea Curții adresată Comisiei de a reduce gradul de detaliere al contractelor de înfrățire pentru a permite o mai mare flexibilitate în gestionarea proiectelor;
Is pleased with the Court's assessment that several remedial measures were introduced by the Commission in the follow-up to the Court's special report on twinning from 2003; invites the Commission to motivate the beneficiary governments more strongly to make use of the outputs of projects realised in the context of their reform efforts; supports the Court's recommendation to the Commission that the latter reduce the level of detail of the twinning contracts in order to allow greater flexibility for project management;
Acțiunile externe
External actions
10. invită Comisia să-i prezinte periodic măsuri specifice prin care UE să aibă un control sporit asupra acțiunilor sale externe în contextele lor geografice (în conformitate cu principiile eficienței, răspunderii și vizibilității);
Invites the Commission regularly to present to Parliament specific measures to further increase EU ownership of its external actions in their geographical contexts (in accordance with the principles of efficiency, accountability and visibility);
Monika Beňová, Elmar Brok, Colm Burke, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Michael Gahler, Georgios Georgiou, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Jana Hybášková, Anna Ibrisagic, Metin Kazak, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Cem Özdemir, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Pașcu, Alojz Peterle, Hubert Pirker, Samuli Pohjamo, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Kristian Vigenin, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Monika Beňová, Elmar Brok, Colm Burke, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Michael Gahler, Georgios Georgiou, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Jana Hybášková, Anna Ibrisagic, Metin Kazak, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Cem Özdemir, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Hubert Pirker, Samuli Pohjamo, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Kristian Vigenin, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Cristian Silviu Bușoi, Giulietto Chiesa, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Evgeni Kirilov, Jaromír Kohlíček, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Erik Meijer, Borut Pahor, Józef Pinior, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Inger Segelström
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Giulietto Chiesa, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Evgeni Kirilov, Jaromír Kohlíček, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Erik Meijer, Borut Pahor, Józef Pinior, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Inger Segelström
AVIZUL COMISIEI PENTRU DEZVOLTARE
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT
Comisia pentru dezvoltare recomandă Comisiei pentru control bugetar, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
5. invită Comisia să îmbunătățească transparența și accesul la documentația privind acțiunile de sprijin bugetar, în special prin încheierea de acorduri cu guvernele țărilor beneficiare, asemănătoare cu acordul-cadru financiar și administrativ (FAFA) care stabilește cadrul pentru gestionarea contribuțiilor financiare ale Comisiei în cadrul ONU;
Invites the Commission to improve the transparency and access to documentation relating to budget support actions, particularly by establishing agreements with beneficiary country government analogous to Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA) setting out the framework for managing the financial contributions made by the Commission to the UN;
6/2007, Curtea de Conturi le aduce proiectelor de asistență tehnică ale Comisiei; remarcă, în continuare, că Comisia abordează aceste probleme prin dezvoltarea unei „strategii pentru îndeplinirea obiectivelor în materie de eficiență a ajutorului în ceea ce privește cooperarea tehnică și unitățile de realizare a proiectelor”, care trebuie să fie finalizată până în iunie 2008; așteaptă cu interes să primească, în timp util, o evaluare a rezultatelor punerii în aplicare a acestei strategii;
Notes the criticisms of Commission Technical Assistance projects made by the Court of Auditors in its Special Report No 6/2007; notes further that the Commission is addressing these questions in developing a "Strategy to meet EU aid effectiveness targets on Technical Cooperation and Project Implementation Units", due to be ready by June 2008; looks forward to receiving, in due course, an assessment of the results of the implementation of this Strategy;
AVIZUL Comisiei pentru ocuparea forței de muncă și afaceri sociale
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs
Raportoare pentru aviz: Jamila Madeira
Draftswoman: Jamila Madeira
Comisia pentru ocuparea forței de muncă și afaceri sociale recomandă Comisiei pentru control bugetar, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Capitolul 3 – Gestiune bugetară
Chapter 3 – Budgetary Management
Capitolul 6 – Politici structurale
Chapter 6 – Structural Policies
Capitolul 7 – Politici interne
Chapter 7 – Internal Policies
Mihael Brejc, Gabriela Crețu, Petru Filip, Jamila Madeira, Csaba Sógor, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Anja Weisgerber
Mihael Brejc, Gabriela Creţu, Petru Filip, Jamila Madeira, Csaba Sógor, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Anja Weisgerber
AVIZUL Comisiei pentru mediu, sănătate publică Și siguranȚă alimentară
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Raportoare pentru aviz: Jutta Haug
Draftswoman: Jutta Haug
Comisia pentru mediu, sănătate publică și siguranță alimentară recomandă Comisiei pentru control bugetar, competentă în fond, includerea următoarelor sugestii în propunerea de rezoluție ce urmează a fi adoptată:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. subliniază, în special, că punerea în aplicare a programului LIFE III, care reprezintă 58% din bugetul operațional al domeniului de politică „Mediu”, a atins o rată de executare a creditelor de angajament de peste 98,7%;
Stresses, in particular, that the implementation of the LIFE III programme, which represents 58% of the operational budget for the policy area "Environment", achieved an implementation rate of over 98,7% in commitment appropriations;
4. evidențiază rata globală de 85,76% de execuție a creditelor de plată din domeniul mediului, ceea ce reprezintă o creștere semnificativă față de 2005 (78,39%);
Underlines the overall implementation rate of 85,76% of payment appropriations in the field of the environment, which represents a significant increase compared to 2005 (78,39%);
6. invită Comisia să-și continue eforturile de îmbunătățire a procedurilor administrative care influențează executarea creditelor de angajament și de plată;
Calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to improve those administrative procedures which have an impact on the implementation of commitment and payment appropriations;
This opinion examines the execution of the budget in the areas of environment, public health and food safety policy for the financial year 2006.
This opinion examines the execution of the budget in the areas of environment, public health and food safety policy for the financial year 2006.
The implementation rates for commitments for the environment budget lines were as good as last year as regards internal and external policies (96,31 %).
The implementation rates for commitments for the environment budget lines were as good as last year as regards internal and external policies (96,31 %).
This was largely due to the satisfactory implementation of the LIFE III programme which represents 58 % of the operational budget for environment and achieved an implementation rate of over 98, 7 %.
This was largely due to the satisfactory implementation of the LIFE III programme which represents 58 % of the operational budget for environment and achieved an implementation rate of over 98, 7 %.
For civil protection, the level of commitments decreased from 81,53 % in 2005 to 61,19 %, largely due to the following factors:
For civil protection, the level of commitments decreased from 81,53 % in 2005 to 61,19 %, largely due to the following factors:
- most of the activities financed on this budget line were linked to the operation of the Community Civil Protection Mechanism and could not be easily forecasted since they depended on the activation of the mechanism in case of interventions during disasters;
- most of the activities financed on this budget line were linked to the operation of the Community Civil Protection Mechanism and could not be easily forecasted since they depended on the activation of the mechanism in case of interventions during disasters;
- the 2 million Euro originally set aside for a call for tender for civil protection exercises could not be used, as none of the few bids received fulfilled the prescribed criteria.
- the 2 million Euro originally set aside for a call for tender for civil protection exercises could not be used, as none of the few bids received fulfilled the prescribed criteria.
The Commission recognized the call for tender procedure as problematic.
The Commission recognized the call for tender procedure as problematic.
Specifications set by the Commission to foster European added value projects have not been met by the bids received.
Specifications set by the Commission to foster European added value projects have not been met by the bids received.
Therefore the Commission went back to the call for proposal procedure.
Therefore the Commission went back to the call for proposal procedure.
Projects are realised under co-financing and mostly led by the respective administration by the Member States.
Projects are realised under co-financing and mostly led by the respective administration by the Member States.
The level of implementation of the pilot project on cross border cooperation in fight against natural disasters was very good: 100 % of appropriations were committed in 2006 further to the publication of a call for proposals.
The level of implementation of the pilot project on cross border cooperation in fight against natural disasters was very good: 100 % of appropriations were committed in 2006 further to the publication of a call for proposals.
6 projects were selected and contracted in early 2007 for with 86 % of the available amount.
6 projects were selected and contracted in early 2007 for with 86 % of the available amount.
The Commission, therefore, envisages a more frequent use of call for proposals rather than call for tenders in the future.
The Commission, therefore, envisages a more frequent use of call for proposals rather than call for tenders in the future.
In the field of marine pollution, the Commission was not in a position to execute more than 21 % (2005: 58,50%) of available appropriations.
In the field of marine pollution, the Commission was not in a position to execute more than 21 % (2005: 58,50%) of available appropriations.
The number of organisations able to submit proposals is very limited due to the specificity of the area.
The number of organisations able to submit proposals is very limited due to the specificity of the area.
The quality of the received proposals was not very high and the very low contribution ceilings for co-financing of actions defined in the legal base had a limiting impact on the overall use of the funds.
The quality of the received proposals was not very high and the very low contribution ceilings for co-financing of actions defined in the legal base had a limiting impact on the overall use of the funds.
The "Marine Pollution" programme ended in 2006.
The "Marine Pollution" programme ended in 2006.
From 2007 onwards, the European Maritime Safety Agency has taken over and developed preparedness actions to enhance information, coordination and cooperation in the area of marine pollution.
From 2007 onwards, the European Maritime Safety Agency has taken over and developed preparedness actions to enhance information, coordination and cooperation in the area of marine pollution.
The overall implementation rate of 85,76% of payment appropriations in the area of environment represents a significant increase compared to 2005 (78,39%).
The overall implementation rate of 85,76% of payment appropriations in the area of environment represents a significant increase compared to 2005 (78,39%).
This percentage raise to 89,6 % for dissociated appropriations lines.
This percentage raise to 89,6 % for dissociated appropriations lines.
The relatively low implementation rate reflects the difficulty in planning payment needs.
The relatively low implementation rate reflects the difficulty in planning payment needs.
The submission of bills or requests for payments by contractors/beneficiaries is largely outside Commission's control.
The submission of bills or requests for payments by contractors/beneficiaries is largely outside Commission's control.
Furthermore, as regards grants (LIFE programme, Civil Protection, Forest Focus), the amounts of final payments to projects are often lower than first anticipated as final eligible expenditure is also lower.
Furthermore, as regards grants (LIFE programme, Civil Protection, Forest Focus), the amounts of final payments to projects are often lower than first anticipated as final eligible expenditure is also lower.
The under-execution of environment policy development support lines (67,90%) is particularly related to the finalisation of commitments for certain procurement procedures at the end of the year, which did not allow for payment of pre-financing payments by the end of 2006.
The under-execution of environment policy development support lines (67,90%) is particularly related to the finalisation of commitments for certain procurement procedures at the end of the year, which did not allow for payment of pre-financing payments by the end of 2006.
The implementation rates for commitments for the health and food safety budget lines were satisfactory, above 90% and roughly equivalent to last year.
The implementation rates for commitments for the health and food safety budget lines were satisfactory, above 90% and roughly equivalent to last year.
The implementation rates for payments for the health and food safety budget lines are traditionally lower than the implementation rates for commitments but this is to a large extend due to the fact that a number of the credits are non dissociated credits and, therefore, a significant share of the payments take place one year after the commitments were made.
The implementation rates for payments for the health and food safety budget lines are traditionally lower than the implementation rates for commitments but this is to a large extend due to the fact that a number of the credits are non dissociated credits and, therefore, a significant share of the payments take place one year after the commitments were made.
The level of implementation of commitments of administrative expenditures is satisfactory with an average of 96%.
The level of implementation of commitments of administrative expenditures is satisfactory with an average of 96%.
As far as payment appropriations are concerned, it is somewhat lower, 80.7%.
As far as payment appropriations are concerned, it is somewhat lower, 80.7%.
But it has to be noted that administrative credits are non dissociated credits and, therefore, payments can take place one year after the commitments were made.
But it has to be noted that administrative credits are non dissociated credits and, therefore, payments can take place one year after the commitments were made.
Overall, the level of implementation of commitment appropriations for the public health programme is satisfactory with an average of 92,85%.
Overall, the level of implementation of commitment appropriations for the public health programme is satisfactory with an average of 92,85%.
The Executive Agency, not having been given its financial autonomy, mainly due to the difficulties in recruiting, was not able to commit the individual grants and corresponding payments for 2006.
The Executive Agency, not having been given its financial autonomy, mainly due to the difficulties in recruiting, was not able to commit the individual grants and corresponding payments for 2006.
In addition, on overestimation of requests of payments from beneficiaries led to an expected under spending of payment credits.
In addition, on overestimation of requests of payments from beneficiaries led to an expected under spending of payment credits.