natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(11) Trebuie să se stabilească pedepse și sancțiuni împotriva persoanelor fizice și juridice sau care au comis sau sunt responsabile de instigarea publică la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism, recrutarea și instruirea în scopuri teroriste, atunci când acestea sunt săvârșite cu intenție.
(11) Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons having committed or being liable for public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Aceste fapte ar trebui să fie pedepsite în mod egal în toate statele membre indiferent dacă sunt săvârșite prin intermediul internetului sau nu.
These forms of behaviour should be equally punishable in all Member States irrespective of whether they are committed through the Internet or not.
(11) Ar trebui să se stabilească pedepse și sancțiuni împotriva persoanelor fizice și juridice care au comis acte de instigare publică la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism, recrutarea și instruirea în scopuri teroriste, atunci când acestea sunt săvârșite cu intenție.
(11) Penalties and sanctions should be provided for natural and legal persons having committed public incitement to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
(11a) Eșecul Consiliului de a conveni asupra drepturilor procedurale în cadrul acțiunilor penale reprezintă un obstacol în calea cooperării judiciare europene; acest impas trebuie depășit de urgență.
(11a) The failure of the Council to agree on procedural rights in criminal proceedings hampers European judicial cooperation; this deadlock urgently needs to be overcome.
(12) Ar trebui adoptate norme juridice suplimentare pentru a garanta instrumentarea eficientă a instigării publice la săvârșirea de infracțiuni de terorism, a recrutării și a instruirii în scopuri teroriste, atunci când acestea au ca obiect sau ca efect săvârșirea unei infracțiuni de terorism care intră în sfera de competență a unui stat membru.
(12) Additional jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism may be effectively prosecuted when they are directed towards or resulted in the commission of a terrorist offence which is subject to the jurisdiction of a Member State .
(12a) Prezenta decizie-cadru completează dispozițiile Convenției Consiliului Europei din 16 mai 2005 privind prevenirea terorismului și, prin urmare, este crucial ca, paralel cu intrarea în vigoare a prezentei decizii-cadru, toate statele membre să ratifice această convenție;
(12a) T his Framework D ecision is complementary to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of 16 May 2005, and it is therefore essential, in parallel with the entry into force of this Framework Decision, that all Member States ratify that Convention.
(14) Uniunea respectă principiile recunoscute în articolul 6 alineatul (2) din Tratatul privind Uniunea Europeană și reafirmate în Carta Drepturilor Fundamentale a Uniunii Europene, în special capitolele II și VI.
(14) The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapters II and VI thereof.
Nici un element din prezenta decizie-cadru nu poate fi interpretat ca urmărind reducerea sau îngrădirea drepturilor sau libertăților fundamentale cum ar fi libertatea de exprimare, de reuniune sau de asociere, dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie, inclusiv dreptul la respectarea confidențialității corespondenței.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association, the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence.
(14) Uniunea respectă principiile recunoscute la articolul 6 alineatul (2) din Tratatul privind Uniunea Europeană și reafirmate în Carta Drepturilor Fundamentale a Uniunii Europene, în special capitolele II și VI.
(14) The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapters II and VI thereof.
Niciun element din prezenta decizie-cadru nu poate fi interpretat în sensul reducerii sau îngrădirii drepturilor sau libertăților fundamentale, cum ar fi libertatea de exprimare, de reuniune sau de asociere, libertatea presei sau libertatea de exprimare în celelalte mijloace de comunicare în masă, sau dreptul la respectarea vieții private și de familie, inclusiv dreptul la respectarea confidențialității corespondenței , care include și conținutul mesajelor electronice și al altor tipuri de corespondență electronică .
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association, freedom of the press and freedom of expression of other media, or the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence, which also covers the content of e-mail and other kinds of electronic correspondence.
(15) Instigarea publică la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism, recrutarea și instruirea în scopuri teroriste sunt infracțiuni care se săvârșesc cu intenție.
(15) Public provocation to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
În consecință, nici un element din prezenta decizie-cadru nu poate fi interpretat ca vizând să reducă sau să restricționeze difuzarea informațiilor în scopuri științifice, academice sau de raportare.
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic or reporting purposes.
Exprimarea opiniilor radicale, polemice sau controversate în cadrul unei dezbateri publice privind chestiunile politice sensibile, inclusiv terorismul, nu intră în sfera de aplicare a prezentei decizii-cadru și, în special, a definiției instigării publice la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism,
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public provocation to commit terrorist offences,
(15) Instigarea publică la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism, recrutarea și instruirea în scopuri teroriste sunt infracțiuni care se săvârșesc cu intenție.
(15) Public incitement to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
În consecință, nici un element din prezenta decizie-cadru nu poate fi interpretat ca vizând să reducă sau să restricționeze difuzarea informațiilor în scopuri științifice, academice , artistice sau de raportare.
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic , artistic or reporting purposes.
Exprimarea opiniilor radicale, polemice sau controversate în cadrul unei dezbateri publice privind chestiunile politice sensibile, inclusiv terorismul, nu intră în sfera de aplicare a prezentei decizii-cadru și, în special, a definiției instigării publice la săvârșirea infracțiunilor de terorism,
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public incitement to commit terrorist offences,
(15a) Incriminarea faptelor enumerate în prezenta decizie-cadru ar trebui realizată astfel încât să fie proporțională cu obiectivele legitime urmărite, să fie necesară și adecvată într-o societate democratică și să aibă un caracter nediscriminatoriu; aceasta ar trebui, în special, să fie compatibilă cu Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene și cu Convenția europeană pentru apărarea drepturilor omului și a libertăților fundamentale.
(15a) The criminalisation of the acts listed in this Framework Decision should be effected in such a way as to be proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued, necessary and appropriate in a democratic society, and non-discriminatory ; they should , in particular, be compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Articolul 1 – punctul -1 (nou)
Article 1 - point -1 (new)
Decizia-cadru 2002/475/JAI
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA
Articolul 1 - alineatul 2
Article 1 - paragraph 2
(-1) La articolul 1, alineatul (2) se modifică după cum urmează:
(-1) Article 1(2) is amended as follows:
Articolul 3 – alineatul 1 – litera a
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (a)
(a) prin „instigarea publică la săvârșirea unei infracțiuni teroriste” se înțelege distribuirea, sau punerea la dispoziția publicului, în orice altă formă, a unui mesaj , cu intenția de a provoca la săvârșirea uneia dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)–(h), atunci când un astfel de comportament , indiferent dacă pledează sau nu în mod direct săvârșirea unei infracțiuni de terorism, creează riscul ca una sau mai multe astfel de infracțiuni să fie comise;
(a) "public provocation to commit a terrorist offence" means the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public, with the intent to incite the commission of one of the acts listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), where such conduct , whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences, causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed;
(a) prin „instigarea publică la săvârșirea unei infracțiuni teroriste” se înțelege distribuirea, sau punerea la dispoziția publicului, în orice altă formă, a unui mesaj pledând în mod clar și deliberat în favoarea săvârșirii uneia dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)–(h), atunci când un astfel de comportament creează în mod evident riscul ca una sau mai multe astfel de infracțiuni să fie comise;
(a) "public incitement to commit a terrorist offence" means the distribution, or otherwise making available, of a message to the public clearly and intentionally advocating the commission of one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), where such conduct manifestly causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed;
Articolul 3 - alineatul 1 - litera b
Article 3 - paragraph 1 - point (b)
(b) prin „recrutarea în scopuri teroriste” se înțelege a solicita unei alte persoane să comită una dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1), sau la articolul 2 alineatul (2);
(b) "recruitment for terrorism" means to solicit another person to commit one of the acts listed in Article 1(1), or in Article 2(2);
(b) prin „recrutarea în scopuri teroriste” se înțelege a solicita unei alte persoane , în mod deliberat, să comită una dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)-(h) , sau la articolul 2 alineatul (2);
(b) "recruitment for terrorism" means intentionally to solicit another person to commit one of the offences listed in Article 1(1) (a) to (h) , or in Article 2(2);
Decizia-cadru 2002/475/JAI
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA
Articolul 3 – alineatul 1 – litera c
Article 3 - paragraph 1 - point (c)
(c) prin „instruire în scopuri teroriste” se înțelege furnizarea de instrucțiuni privind fabricarea sau folosirea explozibililor, a armelor de foc sau a altor arme sau substanțe toxice sau periculoase, sau, privind alte metode și tehnici specifice, cu scopul de a comite una dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1), știind că expertiza transmisă urmează să fie folosită în acest scop.
(c) "training for terrorism" means to provide instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing one of the acts listed in Article 1(1), knowing that the skills provided are intended to be used for this purpose.
(c) prin „instruire în scopuri teroriste” se înțelege furnizarea de instrucțiuni privind fabricarea sau folosirea explozibililor, a armelor de foc sau a altor arme sau substanțe toxice sau periculoase, sau privind alte metode și tehnici specifice, cu scopul de a comite una dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)–(h) , știind că expertiza transmisă urmează să fie folosită în acest scop.
(c) "training for terrorism" means to provide instruction in the making or use of explosives, firearms or other weapons or noxious or hazardous substances, or in other specific methods or techniques, for the purpose of committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1) (a) to (h) , knowing that the skills provided are intended to be used for this purpose.
Articolul 3 – alineatul 2 – litera d
Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point (d)
(d) furt calificat săvârșit în vederea comiterii uneia dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1);
(d) aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the acts listed in Article 1(1);
(d) furt calificat săvârșit în vederea comiterii uneia dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1);
(d) aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1);
Articolul 3 – alineatul 2 – litera e
Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point (e)
(e) extorcarea în vederea comiterii uneia dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1);
(e) extortion with a view to the perpetration of one of the acts listed in Article 1(1);
(e) extorcarea în vederea comiterii uneia dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1);
(e) extortion with a view to the perpetration of one of the offences listed in Article 1(1);
Articolul 3 – alineatul 2 – litera f
Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point (f)
(f) producerea de documente administrative false în vederea comiterii uneia dintre faptele enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)-(h), precum și la articolul 2 alineatul (2) litera (b).
(f) drawing up false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the acts listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h) and Article 2(2)(b).
(f) producerea de documente administrative false în vederea comiterii uneia dintre infracțiunile enumerate la articolul 1 alineatul (1) literele (a)-(h), precum și la articolul 2 alineatul (2) litera (b).
(f) drawing up false administrative documents with a view to committing one of the offences listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h) and Article 2(2)(b).
Incriminarea faptelor prevăzute la alineatul (2) literele (a)-(c) nu poate avea ca efect reducerea sau restricționarea difuzării informațiilor în scopuri științifice, academice, artistice sau de raportare, a exprimării opiniilor radicale, polemice sau controversate în cadrul unei dezbateri publice privind chestiunile politice sensibile, inclusiv terorismul.
The criminalisation of the acts covered in paragraph 2(a) to (c) shall not have the effect of reduc ing or restrict ing the dissemination of information for scientific , academic, artistic or reporting purposes, the expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism.
Articolul 3 – alineatul 3b (nou)
Article 3 - paragraph 3 b (new)
Articolul 9 – alineatul 1a
Article 9 - paragraph 1 a
referitor la propunerea de decizie-cadru a Consiliului de modificare a Deciziei-cadru 2002/475/JAI privind combaterea terorismului
on the proposal for a Council framework decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA was a landmark in the combating of terrorism in the EU.
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA was a landmark in the combating of terrorism in the EU.
It enabled the definition of terrorism, and the penalties for it, to be harmonised across the Member States.
It enabled the definition of terrorism, and the penalties for it, to be harmonised across the Member States.
The Commission has submitted a proposal for the amendment of that Framework Decision with the aim of updating that legal arsenal and, above all, with the clear intention of establishing an appropriate legal framework against cyberterrorism.
The Commission has submitted a proposal for the amendment of that Framework Decision with the aim of updating that legal arsenal and, above all, with the clear intention of establishing an appropriate legal framework against cyberterrorism.
The Commission proposal adds three further criminal offences to the original text:
The Commission proposal adds three further criminal offences to the original text:
§ public provocation to commit terrorist offences;
§ public provocation to commit terrorist offences;
§ recruitment for terrorism, and
§ recruitment for terrorism, and
§ training for terrorism.
§ training for terrorism.
The Commission has to a large extent based its proposal on the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, which, inter alia , recognises those three types of criminal offence.
The Commission has to a large extent based its proposal on the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, which, inter alia , recognises those three types of criminal offence.
Despite appearances, the inclusion of those three offences is unquestionably of added value since it broadens the scope of the Framework Decision:
Despite appearances, the inclusion of those three offences is unquestionably of added value since it broadens the scope of the Framework Decision:
§ Firstly, the definition of ‘terrorist activity’ established by the Framework Decision is broader and more complete than the one deriving from the Council of Europe Convention.
§ Firstly, the definition of ‘terrorist activity’ established by the Framework Decision is broader and more complete than the one deriving from the Council of Europe Convention.
For example, none of the UN Conventions to which it refers covers the death of civilians caused by firearms (not simply explosives
For example, none of the UN Conventions to which it refers covers the death of civilians caused by firearms (not simply explosives
See the Annex to the Council of Europe Convention. ), and
See the Annex to the Council of Europe Convention. ), and
§ Secondly, the legal regime established by the Framework Decision is very comprehensive, including, for example, a system of penalties that would apply automatically to the three offences mentioned.
§ Secondly, the legal regime established by the Framework Decision is very comprehensive, including, for example, a system of penalties that would apply automatically to the three offences mentioned.
Nevertheless, it is essential for the Member States to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the prevention of terrorism as quickly as possible, since the parallel and combined implementation of both those instruments would provide maximum guarantees for citizens of the Union and nationals of the member states of the Council of Europe.
Nevertheless, it is essential for the Member States to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the prevention of terrorism as quickly as possible, since the parallel and combined implementation of both those instruments would provide maximum guarantees for citizens of the Union and nationals of the member states of the Council of Europe.
As regards the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, it is vital to make it clear from the outset that, under the current legal framework, those rights, and particularly the freedom of expression and of association, are fully guaranteed at the level both of the Framework Decision (Article 1(2)) and of the European Union (Article 6 TEU and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights), as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to whose principles and relevant case law the EU is subject.
As regards the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, it is vital to make it clear from the outset that, under the current legal framework, those rights, and particularly the freedom of expression and of association, are fully guaranteed at the level both of the Framework Decision (Article 1(2)) and of the European Union (Article 6 TEU and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights), as well as in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, to whose principles and relevant case law the EU is subject.
There is nothing superfluous in making clarifications to the Framework Decision that lay the emphasis on freedom of expression and association or refer to the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
There is nothing superfluous in making clarifications to the Framework Decision that lay the emphasis on freedom of expression and association or refer to the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Nevertheless, it is vital to make it clear that the EU legal system, per se, fully protects human rights.
Nevertheless, it is vital to make it clear that the EU legal system, per se, fully protects human rights.
Any attempt to counterpose the combating of terrorism and the protection of human rights (implying that terrorism can only be combated to the detriment of human rights) should be emphatically discarded: far from being mutually incompatible objectives, the protection of human rights is the main justification for the combating of terrorism.
Any attempt to counterpose the combating of terrorism and the protection of human rights (implying that terrorism can only be combated to the detriment of human rights) should be emphatically discarded: far from being mutually incompatible objectives, the protection of human rights is the main justification for the combating of terrorism.
Any notion of a dichotomy is artificial, legally flawed and politically dangerous.
Any notion of a dichotomy is artificial, legally flawed and politically dangerous.
Lastly, with regard to training for terrorism, it is suggested that attempting to provide training should also be qualified an offence, since there is a real possibility of training facilities being discovered and dismantled before they have been used, and this must be taken into consideration.
Lastly, with regard to training for terrorism, it is suggested that attempting to provide training should also be qualified an offence, since there is a real possibility of training facilities being discovered and dismantled before they have been used, and this must be taken into consideration.
In short, and although it could be improved upon, the Commission proposal is an appropriate one, as it constitutes a major step towards a more effective combating of terrorism in the EU.
In short, and although it could be improved upon, the Commission proposal is an appropriate one, as it constitutes a major step towards a more effective combating of terrorism in the EU.
It should be highlighted that the Commission proposal would enable the Member States not only to counteract cyberterrorism, but also to neutralise any publicity that constitutes public provocation to commit terrorism, or apologias for it, via any medium and in any place.
It should be highlighted that the Commission proposal would enable the Member States not only to counteract cyberterrorism, but also to neutralise any publicity that constitutes public provocation to commit terrorism, or apologias for it, via any medium and in any place.
For the reasons stated above, the Commission proposal should be supported, subject solely to the amendments proposed in this report.
For the reasons stated above, the Commission proposal should be supported, subject solely to the amendments proposed in this report.
Comisia pentru afaceri juridice recomandă Comisiei pentru libertăți civile, justiție și afaceri interne, competentă în fond, să includă în raportul său următoarele amendamente:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affaire, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report: