natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Secretariat of the European Parliament and the General- Secretariat of the Council shall act jointly as the Conciliation Committee's secretariat, in association with the Secretariat-General of the Commission.
The Secretariat of the European Parliament and the General- Secretariat of the Council shall act jointly as the Conciliation Committee's secretariat, in association with the Secretariat-General of the Commission.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Should the European Parliament or the Council deem it essential to extend the time-limits referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, they shall notify the President of the other institution and the Commission accordingly.
Should the European Parliament or the Council deem it essential to extend the time-limits referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, they shall notify the President of the other institution and the Commission accordingly.
Where an agreement is reached at first or second reading, or during conciliation, the agreed text shall be finalised by the legal-linguistic services of the European Parliament and of the Council acting in close cooperation and by mutual agreement.
Where an agreement is reached at first or second reading, or during conciliation, the agreed text shall be finalised by the legal-linguistic services of the European Parliament and of the Council acting in close cooperation and by mutual agreement.
No changes shall be made to any agreed texts without the explicit agreement, at the appropriate level, of both the European Parliament and the Council.
No changes shall be made to any agreed texts without the explicit agreement, at the appropriate level, of both the European Parliament and the Council.
Finalisation shall be carried out with due regard to the different procedures of the European Parliament and the Council, in particular with respect to deadlines for conclusion of internal procedures.
Finalisation shall be carried out with due regard to the different procedures of the European Parliament and the Council, in particular with respect to deadlines for conclusion of internal procedures.
The institutions undertake not to use the time-limits laid down for the legal-linguistic finalisation of acts to reopen discussions on substantive issues.
The institutions undertake not to use the time-limits laid down for the legal-linguistic finalisation of acts to reopen discussions on substantive issues.
The European Parliament and the Council shall agree on a common presentation of the texts prepared jointly by those institutions.
The European Parliament and the Council shall agree on a common presentation of the texts prepared jointly by those institutions.
As far as possible, the institutions undertake to use mutually acceptable standard clauses to be incorporated in the acts adopted under codecision in particular as regards provisions concerning the exercise of implementing powers (in accordance with the ‘comitology’ decision
As far as possible, the institutions undertake to use mutually acceptable standard clauses to be incorporated in the acts adopted under codecision in particular as regards provisions concerning the exercise of implementing powers (in accordance with the ‘comitology’ decision
Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 27.7.2006, p.
Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 27.7.2006, p.
11). ), entry into force, transposition and the application of acts and respect for the Commission’s right of initiative.
11). ), entry into force, transposition and the application of acts and respect for the Commission’s right of initiative.
The institutions will endeavour to hold a joint press conference to announce the successful outcome of the legislative process at first or second reading or during conciliation.
The institutions will endeavour to hold a joint press conference to announce the successful outcome of the legislative process at first or second reading or during conciliation.
They will also endeavour to issue joint press releases.
They will also endeavour to issue joint press releases.
Following adoption of a legislative act under the codecision procedure by the European Parliament and the Council, the text shall be submitted, for signature, to the President of the European Parliament and the President of the Council and to the Secretaries-General of those institutions.
Following adoption of a legislative act under the codecision procedure by the European Parliament and the Council, the text shall be submitted, for signature, to the President of the European Parliament and the President of the Council and to the Secretaries-General of those institutions.
The Presidents of the European Parliament and the Council shall receive the text for signature in their respective languages and shall, as far as possible, sign the text together at a joint ceremony to be organised on a monthly basis with a view to signing important acts in the presence of the media.
The Presidents of the European Parliament and the Council shall receive the text for signature in their respective languages and shall, as far as possible, sign the text together at a joint ceremony to be organised on a monthly basis with a view to signing important acts in the presence of the media.
The jointly signed text shall be forwarded for publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
The jointly signed text shall be forwarded for publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Publication shall normally follow within two months of the adoption of the legislative act by the European Parliament and the Council.
Publication shall normally follow within two months of the adoption of the legislative act by the European Parliament and the Council.
If one of the institutions identifies a clerical or obvious error in a text (or in one of the language versions thereof), it shall immediately notify the other institutions.
If one of the institutions identifies a clerical or obvious error in a text (or in one of the language versions thereof), it shall immediately notify the other institutions.
If the error concerns an act that has not yet been adopted by either the European Parliament or the Council, the legal-linguistic services of the European Parliament and the Council shall prepare the necessary corrigendum in close cooperation.
If the error concerns an act that has not yet been adopted by either the European Parliament or the Council, the legal-linguistic services of the European Parliament and the Council shall prepare the necessary corrigendum in close cooperation.
Where this error concerns an act that has already been adopted by one or both of those institutions, whether published or not, the European Parliament and the Council shall adopt, by common agreement, a corrigendum drawn up under their respective procedures.
Where this error concerns an act that has already been adopted by one or both of those institutions, whether published or not, the European Parliament and the Council shall adopt, by common agreement, a corrigendum drawn up under their respective procedures.
Concluzia Declaraţiei comune privind modalitățile practice de desfăşurare a procedurii de codecizie
Conclusion of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure
Comisia competentă în fond Data anunțului în plen
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary
Raportor(i) substituit (substitui ț i)
Previous rapporteur(s)
Membri suplean ț i [articolul 178 alineatul (2)] prezen ț i la votul final
Substitute(s) under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Observa ț ii (date disponibile într-o singură limbă)
Comments (available in one language only)
PROPUNERE DE MODIFICARE A REGULAMENTULUI PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN (B6‑0582/2005) 10
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT’S RULES OF PROCEDURE (B6‑0582/2005) Error!
– având în vedere propunerea de modificare a Regulamentului său de procedură ( B6-0582/2005 ),
– having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure B6‑0582/2005 ,
– având în vedere comunicarea Comisiei adresată Parlamentului European, Consiliul, Comitetului Economic şi Social European şi Comitetului Regiunilor şi intitulată: „Punerea în aplicare a programului comunitar de la Lisabona: o strategie de simplificare a cadrului de reglementare [ COM(2005)0535 ]”,
– having regard to the Communication of the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment’ (COM(2005) 0535),
– având în vedere concluziile Consiliului European din 15-16 iunie 2006, în special punctul 41,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 15 and 16 June 2006, particularly paragraph 41 thereof,
– având în vedere rezoluţia sa din 16 mai 2006 privind o strategie de simplificare a cadrului de reglementare
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment,
Texte adoptate de la acea dată, P6_TA(2006)0205 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0205 .
– având în vedere rezoluţia sa din 16 mai 2006 privind rezultatele examinării propunerilor legislative în instanţă în faţa legislatorului
– having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the legislator,
Texte adoptate de la acea dată, P6_TA(2006)0206 . ,
Texts adopted on that date, P6_TA(2006)0206 .
– având în vedere comunicarea Comisiei adresată Consiliului, Parlamentului European, Comitetului Economic şi Social European şi Comitetului Regiunilor, intitulată: „Examinarea strategică a programului «O mai bună legiferare» în Uniunea Europeană” [ COM(2006)0689 ],
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2006)0689 ),
– având în vedere raportul Comisie pentru afaceri constituţionale şi avizul Comisiei pentru afaceri juridice ( A6‑0143/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0143/2007 ),
A. întrucât Parlamentul s-a angajat, în rezoluţia sa din 16 mai 2006, menţionată mai sus, privind o strategie de simplificare a cadrului de reglementare (punctul 21), „să reflecteze la îmbunătăţirea procedurilor sale şi a tehnicilor sale legislative interne în vederea accelerării dosarelor de «simplificare», respectând, în acelaşi timp, procedurile prevăzute de legislaţia primară, în special Tratatul CE”;
A. whereas Parliament undertook, in its abovementioned resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment (paragraph 21), ‘to give thought to the improvement of its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the simplification dossiers, while complying with the procedures laid down in primary law, in this particular case the EC Treaty’,
B. întrucât tehnicile de codificare şi de reformare se numără printre instrumentele cele mai importante de simplificare a legislaţiei comunitare, care face parte din strategia de la Lisabona pentru creşterea economică şi ocuparea forţei de muncă;
B. whereas codification and recasting techniques are among the most important tools for simplifying Community legislation, which is part of the new Lisbon strategy for growth and employment in Europe,
C. întrucât Regulamentul său de procedură conţine o dispoziţie referitoare la codificare, care merită revizuită, dar nu conţine nicio dispoziţiei referitoare la reformare;
C. whereas the Rules of Procedure contain a provision on codification which should be revised, but no provision on recasting,
D. întrucât Parlamentul doreşte, printr-o reexaminare şi clarificare a procedurilor sale, să contribuie din plin la eforturile de simplificare şi să încurajeze Comisia să facă mai multe propuneri în acest sens;
D. whereas Parliament wishes, through a re-examination and clarification of its procedures, to make a serious contribution to the simplification efforts and to encourage the Commission to make more proposals in this spirit,
E. întrucât este de dorit ca Consiliul să întreprindă o acţiune similară,
E. whereas it would be desirable for the Council to undertake similar steps,
Articolul 80
Rule 80
În cazul în care se dovedeşte că propunerea nu implică nicio modificare de fond a legislaţiei comunitare, se aplică procedura prevăzută la articolul 43.
Provided that it is ascertained that the proposal does not entail any change of substance to existing Community legislation, the procedure laid down in Rule 43 shall be followed .
Aceasta o examinează în conformitate cu modalităţile stabilite la nivel interinstituţional 1 pentru a se asigura că nu este decât o simplă codificare, ce nu implică nicio modificare de fond.
The latter shall examine it in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level 1 in order to ascertain that it is a straightforward codification, with no changes of a substantive nature.
(2) Preşedintele comisiei competente în fond sau raportorul desemnat de aceasta pot participa la examinarea şi elaborarea propunerii de codificare.
The chairman of the committee responsible or the rapporteur appointed by that committee may participate in the examination and revision of the proposal for codification.
Dacă este necesar, comisia competentă în fond poate să-şi dea, în prealabil, avizul.
If necessary, the committee responsible may give its opinion beforehand .
Totuşi, la cererea raportorului, preşedintele comisiei competente pentru chestiunile juridice poate supune aprobării acesteia amendamentele referitoare la adaptări tehnice, cu condiţia ca aceste adaptări să fie necesare pentru asigurarea conformităţii propunerii cu regulile de codificare şi să nu implice nicio modificare de fond a propunerii
However, at the rapporteur’s request, the chairman of the committee responsible for legal affairs may submit for the latter’s approval, amendments relating to technical adaptations, provided that those adaptations are necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complies with the codification rules and do not involve any substantive change to the proposal.
Dacă aceasta consideră că propunerea implică o modificare de fond a legislaţiei comunitare, propune Parlamentului respingerea propunerii.
If the committee takes the view that the proposal entails a substantive change to Community legislation, it shall propose that Parliament reject the proposal.
Articolul 80a (nou)
Rule 80a (new)
Articolul 80a
Rule 80a
pentru a se asigura că aceasta nu implică nicio modificare de fond în afara celor care au fost identificate ca atare.
The committee responsible for legal affairs shall examine it in accordance with the arrangements agreed at interinstitutional level 1 with a view to ascertaining that it entails no substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal.
(3) În cazul în care comisia competentă pentru chestiunile juridice consideră că propunerea nu implică nicio modificare de fond în afara celor identificate ca atare, aceasta informează comisia competentă în fond cu privire la acest lucru.
If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible.
Totuşi, amendamentele la părţile care au rămas neschimbate pot fi admise cu titlu excepţional şi, după caz, de către preşedintele acestei comisii dacă acesta consideră că, din motive imperative de coerenţă internă a textului sau de conexitate cu alte amendamente, acest lucru este necesar.
However, amendments to the parts which have remained unchanged may be admitted as a special dispensation and on a case ‑by ‑case basis by the chairman of the above committee if he considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments.
În acest caz, preşedintele invită Comisia să-şi retragă propunerea.
In such a case the President shall call upon the Commission to withdraw its proposal.
În cazul în care Comisia îşi retrage propunerea, Preşedintele constată că procedura a devenit fără obiect şi informează Consiliul cu privire la acest lucru.
If the Commission withdraws its proposal, the President shall record that the procedure is null and void and shall notify the Council of the fact.
În cazul în care Comisia nu îşi retrage propunerea, Parlamentul o retrimite comisiei competente în fond, care o examinează în conformitate cu procedura normală.
If the Commission does not withdraw its proposal, Parliament shall refer it to the committee responsible, which shall consider it in accordance with the normal procedure.
1 Acordul interinstituţional din 28 noiembrie 2001 privind utilizarea mai structurată a tehnicii de reformare a actelor legislative, JO C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
1 Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
PROPUNERE DE MODIFICARE A REGULAMENTULUI PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN ( B6‑0582/2005 )
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT’S RULES OF PROCEDURE B6 ‑ 0582/2005
S'il s'avère que la proposition n'implique aucune modification de fond de la législation communautaire en vigueur, la procédure prévue à l'article 43 est d'application.
Provided that it is ascertained that the proposal does not entail any change of substance to existing Community legislation, the procedure laid down in rule 43 shall be followed.
AVIZ al Comisiei pentru afaceri juridice
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS
destinat Comisiei pentru afaceri constituţionale
for the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
Raportor pentru aviz: Bert Doorn
Rapporteur pour avis: Bert Doorn
Your draftsman agrees on the whole with the approach taken by the rapporteur of the committee responsible.
Your draftsman agrees on the whole with the approach taken by the rapporteur of the committee responsible.
One of the primary obligations of the European Parliament is to improve its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the processing of simplification dossiers.
One of the primary obligations of the European Parliament is to improve its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the processing of simplification dossiers.
Nevertheless, this effort must not detract from the procedures laid down in primary law, especially the codecision procedure where the role of Parliament is of the highest importance owing to its democratic contribution to the decision-making process of the EU.
Nevertheless, this effort must not detract from the procedures laid down in primary law, especially the codecision procedure where the role of Parliament is of the highest importance owing to its democratic contribution to the decision-making process of the EU.
In short, this means that any amendments to Parliament's internal procedures must comply with the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
In short, this means that any amendments to Parliament’s internal procedures must comply with the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
Your draftsman suggests, therefore, certain modifications of the Rules of Procedure which should be taken into consideration with a view to ensuring that the goals of simplification are sufficiently credible and easy to be attained.
Your draftsman suggests, therefore, certain modifications of the Rules of Procedure which should be taken into consideration with a view to ensuring that the goals of simplification are sufficiently credible and easy to be attained.
Revision of Rule 80 seems necessary in order to streamline the mechanism for the adoption of codifications in the light of the commitments entered into by all relevant stakeholders with regard to the simplification process.
Revision of Rule 80 seems necessary in order to streamline the mechanism for the adoption of codifications in the light of the commitments entered into by all relevant stakeholders with regard to the simplification process.
The amended Rule 80 will enable the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine the scope of a codification proposal and refer it directly to the Plenary if it does not contain any substantive changes.
The amended Rule 80 will enable the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine the scope of a codification proposal and refer it directly to the Plenary if it does not contain any substantive changes.
If it does, the Committee will propose the rejection of the Commission proposal.
If it does, the Committee will propose the rejection of the Commission proposal.
A new Rule 80a should then be introduced in order to provide a specific procedure for recasting legislative texts.
A new Rule 80a should then be introduced in order to provide a specific procedure for recasting legislative texts.
As already stated in the EP Resolution on a Strategy for simplification of the regulatory environment, recasting is, along with codification, one of the primary means of simplifying the acquis communautaire and should be used as widely as possible.
As already stated in the EP Resolution on a Strategy for simplification of the regulatory environment, recasting is, along with codification, one of the primary means of simplifying the acquis communautaire and should be used as widely as possible.
New Rule 80a will therefore empower the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine any recasting proposals.
New Rule 80a will therefore empower the Committee on Legal Affairs to examine any recasting proposals.
Each proposal will be referred to the committee responsible for consideration, which will enjoy special amending powers depending on the outcome of the Legal Affairs Committee's examination.
Each proposal will be referred to the committee responsible for consideration, which will enjoy special amending powers depending on the outcome of the Legal Affairs Committee’s examination.
Comisia pentru afaceri juridice recomandă Comisiei pentru afaceri constituţionale, competentă în fond, să includă în raportul său următoarele amendamente:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(1) În cazul în care Comisia sesizează Parlamentul cu o propunere privind codificarea oficială a legislaţiei comunitare, propunerea se trimite la comisia competentă pentru chestiunile juridice.
When a Commission proposal for official codification of Community legislation is submitted to Parliament, it shall be referred to the committee responsible for legal affairs.
În cazul în care se dovedeşte că propunerea nu implică nicio modificare de fond a legislaţiei comunitare, se aplică procedura prevăzută la articolul 43.
Provided that it is ascertained that the proposal does not entail any change of substance to existing Community legislation, the procedure laid down in Rule 43 shall be followed.
Aceasta o examinează pentru a se asigura că nu este decât o simplă codificare, ce nu implică nicio modificare de fond.
The latter shall examine it in order to ascertain that it is no more than a mere codification embodying no changes of a substantive nature.