The ECB has operationalised the legal requirements for assessing recovery plans in a tool that is efficient and largely comprehensive ...but the results of recovery planning are not systematically used for crisis identification or management Supervised entities are positive overall about the recovery planning process Due to the limitation of the sample provided by the ECB, conclusions could not be drawn on the recovery plan assessments Crisis identification The ECB has allocated tasks and established an overall workflow for crisis identification and response, but its guidance on implementing the relevant provisions is underdeveloped 55-59 60 -61 62-64 65-66 67-91 69-72 73 -74 The ECB has processes for crisis identification ... ... but there is no common set of indicators with clear thresholds to determine - 79 - 87 - 91 119 93 - 95 - 99 104 106 109 111 119 130 deterioration and the key identifier has several drawbacks ... ... and monitoring systems need enhancement It is very much down to supervisory teams to decide just when to make early intervention assessments and how to present them 75 80 88 Crisis response 92 - The nature and extent of intensified supervisory activity are defined by each JST Liquidity monitoring tools have been established ... ... but to be operationally efficient the process would need to quantify incurred or likely losses More guidance is required on legal powers and practical measures ... ... on monitoring the implementation of supervisory measures ... ... on the clarity of the guidance on FOLTF assessments ... and on training activities and simulation exercises to enhance the operational efficiency of management Documentation of crisis response in early intervention assessments needs improvement Conclusions and recommendations 94 96 100 - 105 - 107 - 110 - 112 - 120 - 3 Organisational setup Cooperation and coordination with regard to crisis management Recovery planning Crisis identification Crisis response Annex I – Scope limitation 121 122 - 123 124 125 - 126 127 - 130 Annex II – Procedural steps that need to be followed during the assessment of recovery plans in the context of supervisory colleges Annex III – Survey of supervised entities ECB’s replies 4 
... cu privire la monitorizarea punerii în aplicare a măsurilor de supraveghere, ... ... cu privire la claritatea orientărilor legate de evaluările pentru a se stabili dacă o instituție este în curs de a intra în dificultate sau este susceptibilă de a intra în dificultate ... ... și cu privire la activitățile de formare și la exercițiile de simulare realizate pentru a se consolida eficiența operațională a gestionării Documentarea răspunsului la situații de criză în cadrul evaluărilor realizate în vederea unei eventuale intervenții timpurii trebuie să fie ameliorată Concluzii și recomandări Structura organizatorică Cooperarea și coordonarea în materie de gestionare a crizelor Planificarea redresării Identificarea crizelor Răspunsul în situații de criză Anexa I – Limitări ale sferei auditului 105-106 107-109 110-111 112-119 120-130 121 122-123 124 125-126 127-130 Anexa II – Etape procedurale care trebuie urmate în cursul evaluării planurilor de redresare de către colegiile de supraveghetori Anexa III – Chestionarul adresat de Curte entită ților supravegheate Răspunsurile BCE 4