natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The conditions for granting dispensation from plans or provisions contained in the plans mentioned in the sentence above are the same as those mentioned after the first comma in the first sentence. 
Vilkårene for å dispensere fra planer eller planbestemmelser som nevnt i punktet foran, er de samme som etter første komma i første punktum.
The permanent committee for planning matters is also ascribed authority to grant dispensation pursuant to sections 17-2, 23 and 33 in the present Act. 
Det faste utvalg for plansaker er videre dispensasjonsmyndighet etter §§ 17-2, 23 og 33 i loven her.
The dispensation may be made subject to conditions. 
Det kan settes vilkår for dispensasjonen.
Temporary dispensation may be granted for a specific period or for an indefinite period and implies that the applicant, when the period of dispensation has expired, or by order and without cost to the municipality, must remove or alter that which has been constructed or discontinue the temporarily permitted use or comply with the requirement for which postponement has been granted, and if required, restore the property to its previous state. 
Midlertidig dispensasjon kan gis for en tidsbestemt eller for ubestemt tid og innebærer at eieren ved dispensasjonstidens utløp eller ved pålegg uten utgift for kommunen må fjerne eller endre det utførte eller opphøre med midlertidig tillatt bruk eller oppfylle det krav det er gitt utsettelse med, og hvis det kreves, gjenopprette den tidligere tilstand.
It is binding on the mortgagee and other possessors of rights to a property regardless of when the right was established and regardless of whether the declaration is registered". 
Den er bindende for panthavere og andre rettighetshavere i eiendommen uten hensyn til når retten er stiftet og uten hensyn til om erklæringen er tinglyst.»
Thus, the general starting point is that dispensation should not be viewed as a viable option. 
Det generelle utgangspunktet er at det ikke skal være en kurant sak å gi dispensasjon.
The objectives of the Planning and Building Act will be central to this kind of assessment. 
Ved avveiningen vil plan- og bygningslovens formål være sentrale.
Other factors may also be relevant, but should not be ascribed such importance. 
Andre momenter kan være relevante, men vil ikke ha tilsvarende vekt.
This entails that the more important the requirement that is not fulfilled, the more pressing the case for dispensation must be. 
Dette innebærer at jo mer sentralt krav man fraviker, jo tyngre må behovet for dispensasjon være.
The rules in the Technical Building Regulations regarding access for people with reduced mobility and difficulties orienting themselves have been passed with the goal of ensuring that as many people as possible will be able to use institutions that are aimed at the public. 
Reglene i teknisk forskrift om atkomst for bevegelses- og orienteringshemmede er vedtatt med det mål for øye at flest mulig skal kunne benytte publikumsrettede institusjoner.
Since the requirements in the Technical Building Regulations are performance-based and thus in essence do not allow for alternative solutions, there are very few cases in which sufficient "special reasons" will exist. 
Siden kravene i TEK nå er funksjonsbaserte, og i utgangspunktet således åpner for flere løsninger, skal det svært mye til for at «særlige grunner» foreligger.
This is related to the fact that non-compliance with the requirements laid down in the regulations will generally entail that the purpose of the regulations is not being upheld, at the same time as this is in fact unnecessary, since there are several alternative solutions for fulfilment of the requirements. 
Dette henger sammen med at en fravikelse av forskriften som regel vil innebære at hensynet bak forskriften ikke ivaretas, samtidig som dette vil være unødvendig i og med at det i utgangspunktet foreligger alternativer til oppfyllelse av kravene.
On page 9 of the guidelines to the Technical Building Regulations, in the section on dispensation, it is stated that: "In respect of the provisions regarding accessibility to and within buildings for people with disabilities, this is a minimum requirement compliance with which is very much in the public interest. 
I veiledningen til TEK er det på side 9 blant annet sagt følgende om dispensasjon: «Når det gjelder bestemmelsene om funksjonshemmedes tilgjengelighet til og i bygninger, er dette minimumskrav som det offentlige har sterk interesse av at blir fulgt.
4.2.1 Construction of new buildings 
4.2.1 Oppføring av nybygg
In connection with applications for planning permission for new buildings, the starting point will be that there must be pressing extenuating circumstances for dispensation from the requirements regarding accessibility in the Technical Building Regulations to be granted. 
Ved søknader om nybygg vil utgangspunktet være at det skal mye til for å få innvilget en dispensasjon fra tilgjengelighetskravene i teknisk forskrift.
At this stage, there is every opportunity to adapt the building to meet the relevant requirements. 
På dette stadiet er det gode muligheter for å tilpasse bygget til de krav som gjelder.
The requirements regarding accessibility are as binding on applicants as the requirements regarding good use of space, height, etc. 
Kravene til tilgjengelighet er en like sterk binding for søker som krav til utnyttelse, høyde etc.
The planners are therefore responsible for adapting the project to these rules and cannot expect the municipality to grant them dispensation. 
Den prosjekterende har derfor ansvar for å tilpasse tiltaket til disse reglene, og kan ikke forvente at kommunen vil tillate at disse fravikes.
4.2.2 Alteration to existing constructions 
4.2.2 Tiltak på bestående byggverk
The situation may be somewhat different in connection with applications for extensions, additions and alterations. 
For tilbygg, påbygging og underbygging kan situasjonen være annerledes.
When projects of this kind are going to be undertaken or an existing project is going to be altered, it is easy for the situation to arise where implementation of the requirements for access may entail problems that can be used as valid grounds for exemption from the requirements (see the section on "special reasons" below). 
Dersom et slikt tiltak skal gjennomføres eller eventuelt en ombygging av et eksisterende tiltak skal finne sted, vil det lettere kunne oppstå situasjoner hvor gjennomføring av kravene til atkomst kan medføre hindringer som kan begrunne avvik fra kravene, se nærmere om «særlige grunner» nedenfor.
However, as a starting point, the rules will apply in full for the actual extension, addition or alteration itself. 
For selve til- på- eller underbygget gjelder reglene i utgangspunktet uavkortet.
As a rule, dispensation can only be granted on the basis of the fact that the relationship between the design of the existing construction and that of the new construction will render this difficult or inappropriate, as in the example of an attic conversion. 
En dispensasjon vil som utgangspunkt bare kunne begrunnes i at forholdet mellom utformingen av eksisterende tiltak og til- på- eller underbygget gjør det vanskelig eller uhensiktsmessig, som f eks ved bygging av loftsleilighet.
Nor should dispensation be granted for anything other than that which is strictly necessary. 
Det bør heller ikke gis dispensasjon for mer enn det som er strengt nødvendig.
However, this provision has a different basis of assessment to the one pursuant to section 7 of the Act. 
Denne bestemmelsen har imidlertid et annet vurderingsgrunnlag enn lovens § 7.
For example, the requirement for "special reasons" does not apply to section 88, but this provision can only be applied when it is deemed reasonable on the basis of health, fire-precaution or other technical provisions. 
Kravet om «særlige grunner» gjelder f eks ikke for § 88, men bestemmelsen kan bare anvendes når det finnes forsvarlig ut fra helsemessige, branntekniske og andre tekniske bestemmelser.
The Ministry advises very restricted use of section 88. 
Kommunens adgang til å benytte pbl.
The power of municipalities to use section 89, second paragraph of the Planning and Building Act, which includes an order to improve the standard of existing constructions, presupposes that the Ministry has issued detailed regulations on this matter. 
§ 89, annet ledd, som innbefatter pålegg om utbedring av bestående byggverk, forutsetter at departementet har gitt nærmere forskrifter om dette.
The Ministry is going to review this matter. 
Departementet vil vurdere dette nærmere.
4.2.3 Public buildings 
4.2.3 Offentlige bygg
In connection with public buildings, a special responsibility lies with the public body responsible for the project to ensure that the requirements regarding accessibility are fulfilled. 
For offentlige bygg påhviler det den offentlige tiltakshaver et særlig ansvar for å ivareta at kravene til tilgjengelighet blir oppfylt.
As a general rule, building projects initiated by government agencies will house an activity that is aimed at the public or that may be suitable as a work place for people with disabilities. 
De byggetiltak det offentlige igangsetter vil som regel huse en virksomhet som er publikumsrettet, eller kan egne seg som arbeidsplasser for funksjonshemmede.
In the case of an activity that is aimed at the public, it would also go against the principle of an open government administration if the technical solutions in the building did not provide adequate accessibility for all the users. 
Der virksomheten er publikumsrettet vil det også være i strid med prinsippene om en åpen forvaltning dersom de tekniske løsninger i bygget ikke gir en tilfredsstillende atkomstløsning for alle brukere.
The government administration should demonstrate through its own building activities that it regards the requirements for accessibility as a natural prerequisite in the design and implementation of construction projects. 
Det offentlige bør gjennom sin egen byggevirksomhet vise at kravene til tilgjengelighet framstår som en naturlig del av forutsetningene for prosjektering og gjennomføring av tiltak.
In respect of the requirement for accessibility, there may be considerations that indicate that the requirements can be departed from. 
I forhold til krav om tilgjengelighet vil det kunne foreligge hensyn som tilsier at kravene kan fravikes.
The most commonly cited reasons are financial, aesthetic or heritage considerations. 
De grunnene som har vært mest påberopt har vært økonomi, estetiske hensyn og antikvariske hensyn.
The assessment of whether the reason quoted does in fact constitute a satisfactory "special reason" may also depend on the type of project, i.e. whether it is a new construction, an extension or alteration, a conversion or a change in the use of the building. 
Vurderingen av om «særlige grunner» er oppfylt vil dessuten kunne avhenge av type bygg: nybygg, til- på- og underbygg, ombygging eller bruksendring.
An increase in building costs is not necessarily ascribed greater importance than, say, the requirements regarding safety or good use of space. 
Økning av byggekostnadene har i seg selv ikke større vekt her enn ved f eks krav om sikkerhet eller utnyttelse.
For this kind of argument to be ascribed importance, there must be a background of extraordinarily large expenses as a result of factors beyond the control of the body responsible for the project. 
For at et slikt argument skal kunne tillegges vekt må det ha bakgrunn i ekstraordinært store utgifter som følge av forhold tiltakshaver ikke råder over.
However, this is often not apparent until after the application has been approved. 
Dette vil imidlertid ofte ikke være aktuelt før etter at søknaden er innvilget.
The fact that the undertaking has already been designed or built when it is discovered that certain elements are not sufficiently adapted to the needs of people with disabilities in accordance with the requirements does not qualify as an acceptable special reason to be granted dispensation. 
At tiltaket allerede er ferdig prosjektert eller bygget, ovennevnte uten at forholdene er ment tilrettelagt for funksjonshemmede i samsvar med kravene, er ikke tilstrekkelig som særlig grunn.
In some cases, if the requirements cannot be implemented without extensive reconstruction, this may be regarded as sufficient grounds for granting dispensation, but as a general rule, this will not apply to new buildings. 
Dersom kravene ikke kan gjennomføres fullt ut uten vesentlige ombygningsarbeider, vil dette i noen tilfelle kunne gi grunnlag for dispensasjon, men for nybygg vil dette som utgangspunkt ikke være aktuelt.
In this type of assessment, a decisive factor will be whether it is possible to use the building for a different profitable purpose. 
Ved denne vurderingen vil det være sentralt om bygningen kan brukes til annet regningssvarende formål.
Another acceptable "special reason" is that the requirements for accessibility entail a breach with the architectural concept behind the design of the building. 
En annen «særlig grunn» kan være at tilgjengelighetskravene bryter med den arkitektoniske ideen bak utformingen av bygget.
This is not a valid argument in connection with new buildings. 
For nybygg vil dette ikke være aktuelt å påberope.
The access solution must be regarded as an integral part of the necessary conditions that all parties initiating a building project have to take into account when designing a project. 
Atkomstløsningen må anses som en del av de forutsetninger enhver tiltakshaver må forholde seg til ved utformingen av et prosjekt.
It is therefore the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the requirements are fulfilled within an aesthetically satisfactory design of the undertaking. 
Det er derfor tiltakshavers/søkers ansvar å sørge for at kravene oppfylles innenfor en estetisk tilfredsstillende utforming av tiltaket.
In connection with a change in use or conversion of an existing building, problems pertaining to aesthetic considerations may play a more prominent part, since the solution will usually be bound by existing constraints. 
Ved bruksendring og ombygging kan estetiske problemer komme noe sterkere inn ved at løsningen ofte er bundet av eksisterende rammer.
An assessment must be made regarding the scope of the aesthetic discordance of the project - both in its own right and in relation to the surroundings - weighed up against the strong public interest in achieving access that complies with the regulations. 
Det må foretas en vurdering av hvor estetisk utilfredsstillende tiltaket blir, i forhold til seg selv og omgivelsene, avveiet mot den sterke offentlige interesse i å få til en atkomst som tilfredsstiller regelverket.
The assessment must also take account of the fact that the body responsible for the project is responsible for finding aesthetic solutions for the building as a whole, including satisfaction of the requirements for accessibility, and that this must be done in an aesthetically pleasing way. 
Det må også tas i betraktning at tiltakshaver har ansvar for å finne estetiske løsninger for helheten i bygget, herunder at kravene til tilgjengelighet kan tilfredsstilles, og at det gjøres på en estetisk sett tilfredsstillende måte.
Thus, it is unlikely that aesthetic considerations will qualify as an acceptable "special reason" for insufficient compliance with the requirements for accessibility. 
Estetikk vil dermed vanskelig kunne begrunnes som «særlig grunn» for en manglende oppfyllelse av tilgjengelighetskravene.
It can be particularly difficult to ensure fulfilment of the requirements regarding accessibility in protected and listed buildings. 
For fredede og vernede bygninger kan det særlig by på problemer å oppfylle kravene til tilgjengelighet.
The assessment must take account of the preservation value of the building weighed up against the degree to which the proposed solution marks a breach with the authentic appearance of the building. 
I avveiningen må det tas hensyn til bygningens verneverdi målt opp mot i hvilken grad løsningen bryter med bygningens autentiske uttrykk.
However, a great deal of importance shall be attached to the issue of accessibility when considering this against preserving the original appearance of the building. 
Imidlertid må hensynet til tilgjengelighet veie tungt når en vurderer dette opp mot bygningens autentiske uttrykk.
It will be relevant to look at the correlation between the change in the project and the history of the building and the expert considerations on which the preservation order was passed. 
Sammenhengen mellom endringen av tiltaket og bygningens historie og de faglige hensyn som ligger bak bevaringsvedtaket vil være relevant.
4.4. 
4.4 Kommunens saksbehandling
Treatment of applications by the municipality 
I pbl.
In section 7 of the Planning and Building Act, it is stated that the municipality may grant dispensation. 
§ 7 er det sagt at kommunen kan dispensere.
Even if the requirement for special reasons has been met, it is up to the professional judgement of the municipality to decide if it wants to grant dispensation. 
Selv om kravet til særlige grunner er oppfylt, vil det være opp til kommunens frie skjønn om den vil dispensere.
The freedom granted to the municipality to use its discretion in cases does not mean that it is has total autonomy to decide. 
At kommunen har et fritt skjønn, innebærer likevel ikke at den står helt fritt.
Reasons must be given for its decision, whether it denies or accepts an application for dispensation from requirements. 
Både avslag og innvilgelse av en dispensasjonssøknad skal begrunnes.
The fact that the municipality has decided to apply certain principles in relation to granting dispensation from certain rules in the building code and that no good reason has been found to suggest the need to depart from these principles in the case in hand, generally constitutes tenable grounds for denying an application for dispensation. 
At kommunen har inntatt et prinsipielt standpunkt i forhold til visse typer dispensasjoner fra byggesaksreglene, og at man ikke finner grunn til å fravike disse i dette bestemte tilfelle, vil normalt være en holdbar begrunnelse.
Nevertheless, it must be clear that the municipality has considered the details of the specific application for dispensation from requirements, including the applicant's reasons and other relevant arguments. 
Det må likevel komme frem at kommunen konkret har vurdert den enkelte dispensasjonssøknad, både søkerens og andre relevante argumenter.
In addition, there will be certain limits to the practice of professional judgement in relation to the "may" assessment. 
Det vil også være visse skranker for skjønnsutøvelsen i forhold til «kan» – vurderingen.
By contrast, the municipality is not allowed to judge freely whether there are adequate special reasons for granting dispensation. 
Kommunen kan derimot ikke fritt vurdere om det foreligger særlige grunner.
This is a case of assessment according to the application of the law, which entails that the municipality must accept the reasons if they lie within the bounds of what is normally accepted as an eligible special reason. 
Dette er et såkalt «rettsanvendelsesskjønn», som betyr at kommunen må godta grunnene dersom de ligger innenfor det som normalt aksepteres som særlige grunner.
In the event of a decision being appealed, it is the county governor that will assess whether the cited grounds represent an accepted interpretation of the concept of "special reasons". 
Ved en eventuell klage er det fylkesmannen som vurderer om dette ligger innenfor en akseptert tolkning av begrepet «særlige grunner».
Although, user participation is not a legal prerequisite in the consideration of each individual application for building permission, municipalities are urged to consult the users in the processing of building applications where there is no question of granting dispensation from the requirements regarding accessibility. 
For den enkelte byggesak er likevel ikke medvirkning lovmessig forutsatt, men det oppfordres til at kommunen gjennomfører dette i byggesaks¬prosesser dersom dispensasjon fra tilgjengelighetskravene er aktuelt.
T-5/99E Accessibility for all 
Tilgjengelighet for alle
Circular T-5/99E 
Rundskriv T-5/99 B
'After half a year of fighting, the world's newest country is barreling toward calamity. 
-After half a year of fighting, the world's newest country is barreling toward calamity.
But its leaders can pull it back from the brink -- if they choose to do so', write Rajiv Shah, Valerie Amos, Kristalina Georgieva and Børge Brende in an argument in Foreign Policy on 21 August 2014. 
But its leaders can pull it back from the brink -- if they choose to do so, skriver Rajiv Shah, Valerie Amos, Kristalina Georgieva og Børge Brende i en artikkel i Foreign Policy 21. august.
After half a year of fighting, the world's newest country is barreling toward calamity. 
After half a year of fighting, the world's newest country is barreling toward calamity.
But its leaders can pull it back from the brink -- if they choose to do so. 
But its leaders can pull it back from the brink -- if they choose to do so.
For more than seven months now, South Sudan has been at war with itself. 
For more than seven months now, South Sudan has been at war with itself.
A power struggle among members of the ruling elite has plunged the nation into a human catastrophe of alarming proportions. 
A power struggle among members of the ruling elite has plunged the nation into a human catastrophe of alarming proportions.
Three years after South Sudanese celebrated their nation's independence, they are watching their hard-won struggle for peace slip away. 
Three years after South Sudanese celebrated their nation's independence, they are watching their hard-won struggle for peace slip away.
Those who voted for the right to make their own way in the world as a sovereign people are victims yet again -- this time to an abject failure of leadership. 
Those who voted for the right to make their own way in the world as a sovereign people are victims yet again -- this time to an abject failure of leadership.
Opportunity after opportunity to end the senseless fighting has come and gone. 
Opportunity after opportunity to end the senseless fighting has come and gone.
Despite the valiant mediation efforts of the region's Intergovernmental Authority on Development in East Africa and the United Nations, a cessation of hostilities signed in January and a recommitment to a peace process made in May have not been met. 
Despite the valiant mediation efforts of the region's Intergovernmental Authority on Development in East Africa and the United Nations, a cessation of hostilities signed in January and a recommitment to a peace process made in May have not been met.
Deadlines pass without actions. 
Deadlines pass without actions.
Meanwhile, the fighting continues, and suffering worsens. 
Meanwhile, the fighting continues, and suffering worsens.
Today, a deadly cholera outbreak threatens thousands of people; more than 1.7 million people have been driven from their homes; and the looming shadow of famine grows closer every day. 
Today, a deadly cholera outbreak threatens thousands of people; more than 1.7 million people have been driven from their homes; and the looming shadow of famine grows closer every day.
On the ground, our aid workers are reporting children arriving in camps with hair that has turned red -- a telltale sign of life-threatening malnutrition. 
On the ground, our aid workers are reporting children arriving in camps with hair that has turned red -- a telltale sign of life-threatening malnutrition.
More than half of the population -- 7.3 million people -- live with hunger, and 50,000 children could die this year if emergency aid does not reach them. 
More than half of the population -- 7.3 million people -- live with hunger, and 50,000 children could die this year if emergency aid does not reach them.
South Sudan now faces the worst food security crisis in the world, but even the risk of starvation has not been enough to bring about peace. 
South Sudan now faces the worst food security crisis in the world, but even the risk of starvation has not been enough to bring about peace.