natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘Access to basic health services and vaccination and nutrition programmes is vital for ensuring that children are able to go to school. 
- Grunnleggende helsetjenester, vaksiner og ernæring er en forutsetning for at barn skal kunne gå på skolen.
Education has a positive effect on a number of health indicators. 
Utdanning har positiv effekt på en rekke helseindikatorer.
For example, we know that girls with an education tend to marry and have children later, which helps to reduce child and maternal mortality,’ said Mr Brende. 
For eksempel vet vi at jenter som tar utdannelse, gifter seg senere og få barn senere, noe som bidrar til lavere barne- og mødredødelighet, sier Brende.
The situation is critical in the West African countries that are affected by the Ebola outbreak. 
Situasjonen er kritisk i ebola-rammede land i Vest-Afrika.
An additional contribution of NOK 89 million, which was announced on 6 October, brings Norway’s total funding for the fight against Ebola up to just over NOK 184 million for 2014. 
Et nytt bidrag på 89 millioner kroner, som ble annonsert 6. oktober, bringer den samlede norske støtten til bekjempelse av ebola opp til i overkant av 184 millioner kroner for 2014.
The Government also proposes an increase in Norway’s funding to the vaccine alliance GAVI of NOK 100 million, bringing the total to NOK 1.3 billion. 
Bidraget til Den globale vaksinealliansen Gavi foreslås økt med 100 millioner kroner til 1,3 milliarder kroner.
GAVI is the most important tool for achieving MDG 4 on reducing child mortality. 
Gavi er det viktigste redskapet for oppnåelse av tusenårsmål 4 om redusert barnedødelighet.
By the end of 2015, GAVI will have vaccinated more than 500 million children. 
Gavi vil ved utgangen av 2015 ha bidratt til vaksinering av godt over 500 millioner barn.
Nearly eight million deaths have been prevented as a result of these vaccinations. 
Nær åtte millioner barnedødsfall har vært unngått som følge av disse vaksinene.
Global helse 
Global helse
Nearly NOK 3 billion to global health 
Nærmere tre milliarder kroner til global helse
'Health, like education, is a crucial factor for economic growth. 
- Helse er sammen med utdanning avgjørende for å skape økonomisk vekst.
Importance of health for education 
Helse viktig for utdanning
'Basic health services, good nutrition and access to vaccination programmes are vital for ensuring that children are able to go to school and get an education. 
- Grunnleggende helsetjenester, ernæring og vaksiner er en forutsetning for at barn skal kunne gå på skolen og ta utdanning.
At the same time, education has a positive effect on a number of health indicators. 
Samtidig ser vi at skole og utdanning har positiv effekt på en rekke helseindikatorer.
For example, girls with an education tend to marry and have children later. 
For eksempel vil jenter som tar utdannelse gifte seg senere og få barn senere.
This in turn helps to reduce child and maternal mortality,' said Mr Brende. 
Dette gir lavere barne- og mødredødelighet, sier utenriksministeren.
Gavi and the Global Fund 
Vaksinealliansen Gavi og Det globale fondet
Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria are key partners in the Government's global health efforts. 
Vaksinealliansen Gavi og Det globale fondet for bekjempelse av aids, tuberkulose og malaria er sentrale i regjeringens satsning på global helse.
The Government proposes an increase in Norway's support for Gavi and agreements amounting to NOK 6 250 million for the period 2016–20. 
Regjeringen foreslår å øke støtten til vaksinealliansen Gavi og at avtaler for 6,25 milliarder kroner inngås for perioden 2016-2020.
This is in addition to NOK 190 million per year provided to Gavi for polio vaccination programmes and NOK 150 million per year provided to the International Finance Facility for Immunisation. 
I tillegg kommer støtten til poliovaksinering gjennom Gavi på 190 millioner kroner årlig, og støtte gjennom finansieringsmekanismen IFFIm (The International Finance Facility for Immunisation) på 150 millioner kroner årlig.
'Gavi is an important instrument for reducing child mortality in poor countries. 
- Vaksinealliansen Gavi er et viktig redskap for redusert barnedødelighet i fattige land.
Over the next five-year period, Gavi will help to ensure that 300 million children are vaccinated. 
Gavi skal i femårsperioden bidra til vaksinering av 300 millioner barn.
This will prevent five million deaths,' said Mr Brende. 
Om lag fem millioner barnedødsfall vil bli avverget som følge av vaksinene, sier Børge Brende.
These efforts will be in line with the UN's new Sustainable Development Goal on health. 
Innsatsen vil støtte opp under FNs nye bærekraftsmål for helse.
More than NOK 3 billion for global health 
Over tre milliarder kroner til global helse
The Government proposes an increase in funding for global health efforts of NOK 150 million in next year's budget. 
Regjeringen foreslår å øke støtten til globale helsetiltak med 150 millioner kroner i neste års budsjett.
This will mean that, in the current parliamentary term, we will have increased our funding for this area by NOK 600 million. 
Med dette har vi økt innsatsen med 600 millioner kroner i denne stortingsperioden.
Our direct support to UNAids and the World Health Organization, which amounts to NOK 300 million, comes in addition to this. 
I tillegg kommer direkte støtte til UNAids og Verdens helseorganisasjon på 300 millioner kroner.
The increased allocation reflects the fact that health is crucial for creating growth and achieving the UN's Sustainable Development Goals. 
Økningen gjenspeiler at helse er avgjørende for å skape vekst og oppnå FNs bærekraftsmål.
In the time ahead, we will have an even stronger focus on reaching people who are particularly at risk because of war and conflict,' said Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende. 
I tiden som kommer vil vi satse sterkere på å nå de som er særlig utsatt på grunn av krig og konflikt, sier utenriksminister Børge Brende.
Global health will remain a key area in Norway's development policy. 
Arbeidet med global helse forblir en sentral pilar i utviklingspolitikken.
Norway is at the forefront of efforts to promote global health at the international level. 
Norge er en pådriver for global helse internasjonalt.
Our primary focus is on maternal and child health and the fight against Aids, tuberculosis and malaria. 
Innsatsen retter seg særlig mot mødre- og barnehelse og bekjempelse av aids, tuberkulose og malaria.
'We know that immunisation is one of the best investments we can make to improve global health. 
- Vi vet at vaksinering er en av de beste investeringene vi kan gjøre for global helse.
Every year some 19 million children do not receive the basic vaccines they need. 
Hvert år er det om lag 19 millioner barn som ikke får de grunnleggende vaksinene de trenger.
Since 2000, Gavi has helped to vaccinate 500 million children and thus prevent seven million deaths. 
Siden 2000 har Gavi bidratt til å vaksinere 500 millioner barn og bidratt til å avverge sju millioner barnedødsfall.
Since 2002, the Global Fund has helped save 20 million lives. 
Siden 2002 har Det globale fondet bidratt til at 20 millioner menneskeliv har blitt spart.
'The Ebola outbreak in West Africa highlighted the need to focus on early vaccine development. 
- Ebola-utbruddet i Vest-Afrika har vist behovet for å satse på tidlig utvikling av vaksiner.
Norway is one of the partners behind the establishment of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (Cepi), a new public-private partnership for vaccine development. 
Norge har derfor sammen med flere tatt initiativ til et nytt offentlig-privat partnerskap for vaksineutvikling, Coalition for Epidemic Prearedness Innovations.
The initiative will strengthen efforts to prevent epidemics from leading to large-scale humanitarian crises,' Mr Brende said. 
Initiativet vil styrke arbeidet med å hindre at utbrudd av epidemier fører til større humanitære kriser, sier utenriksminister Brende.
'Maternal and child health is one of the areas where the Government's education and health efforts are mutually reinforcing. 
- Mødre- og barnehelse er et av områdene der regjeringens satsing på utdanning og helse spiller sammen.
We know that girls who go to school and gain an education tend to marry and have children later. 
Vi vet at jenter som går på skole og tar utdanning gifter seg senere og får barn senere.
Promoting education for girls and women is crucial for reducing maternal and child mortality,' Mr Brende said. 
Utdanning av jenter og kvinner er svært viktig for å redusere mødre- og barnedødeligheten, sier utenriksminister Brende.
'The Government proposes an allocation of more than NOK 3 billion to global health in next year's budget. 
- Regjeringen foreslår å sette av mer enn tre milliarder kroner til global helse på neste års budsjett.
State of the Planet Conference, New York, 27 March 2008 
State of the Planet Conference, New York, 27 March 2008
Based on a transcript of the speech. 
Based on a transcript of the speech.
This afternoon I would like to share with you what I would call a personal journey, which has meant a great deal to me and helped to shape some of the key ideas that we are working on now. 
This afternoon I would like to share with you what I would call a personal journey, which has meant a great deal to me and helped to shape some of the key ideas that we are working on now.
You might ask why a foreign minister has been invited here to talk about health. 
You might ask why a foreign minister has been invited here to talk about health.
Surely we have health ministers for that. 
Surely we have health ministers for that.
I will try to answer this question, and in doing so I will touch on some of the issues that Jeff alluded to in his speech. 
I will try to answer this question, and in doing so I will touch on some of the issues that Jeff alluded to in his speech.
I was brought into the field of global health in 1997, when Dr Brundtland, the outgoing Norwegian Prime Minister, decided to run for Director General of the World Health Organization. 
I was brought into the field of global health in 1997, when Dr Brundtland, the outgoing Norwegian Prime Minister, decided to run for Director General of the World Health Organization.
And I was invited in on her team. 
And I was invited in on her team.
In the autumn of 1997, we campaigned in Africa. 
In the autumn of 1997, we campaigned in Africa.
It is quite a tough job running for the post of Director General of the WHO because you have to get enough votes in the executive board from all different parts of the world. 
It is quite a tough job running for the post of Director General of the WHO because you have to get enough votes in the executive board from all different parts of the world.
While I was travelling in Africa with Dr Brundtland, I saw things that I had never really seen before. 
While I was travelling in Africa with Dr Brundtland, I saw things that I had never really seen before.
I saw that health issues had important implications extending far beyond the health sector. 
I saw that health issues had important implications extending far beyond the health sector.
And how incredibly important human health, national health and global health were to so many of the dimensions of society. 
And how incredibly important human health, national health and global health were to so many of the dimensions of society.
I remember when we arrived in Botswana, a country that Norway has worked closely with for many years. 
I remember when we arrived in Botswana, a country that Norway has worked closely with for many years.
We had just concluded our development cooperation with Botswana because the country had made so much progress. 
We had just concluded our development cooperation with Botswana because the country had made so much progress.
Life expectancy had risen to 70, which is quite sensational in an African context. 
Life expectancy had risen to 70, which is quite sensational in an African context.
But while we were there, researchers from the University of Harare published new figures that readjusted average life expectancy in Botswana to 35 years. 
But while we were there, researchers from the University of Harare published new figures that readjusted average life expectancy in Botswana to 35 years.
This was in 1997, when the first AIDS figures really started to make an impact. 
This was in 1997, when the first AIDS figures really started to make an impact.
And we could literally see and feel the consequences for the population, for the integrity of the state. 
And we could literally see and feel the consequences for the population, for the integrity of the state.
What would happen to the teachers, the police, the army, the civil servants, the mothers and fathers? 
What would happen to the teachers, the police, the army, the civil servants, the mothers and fathers?
Then we went on to Angola, which had a seat on the board of the WHO and was going to cast its vote. 
Then we went on to Angola, which had a seat on the board of the WHO and was going to cast its vote.
There we met with the Health Minister, and I discovered that the Minister was not in the Angolan cabinet, not in the inner circle of government. 
There we met with the Health Minister, and I discovered that the Minister was not in the Angolan cabinet, not in the inner circle of government.
I then developed my own thesis that there is a negative correlation between the weight of the health challenge and the influence of the health minister. 
I then developed my own thesis that there is a negative correlation between the weight of the health challenge and the influence of the health minister.
In my country, as in other developed countries with good health status, you win or lose an election because of health policy. 
In my country, as in other developed countries with good health status, you win or lose an election because of health policy.
Whereas in the poorest countries, health is all too often simply given low priority. 
Whereas in the poorest countries, health is all too often simply given low priority.
When Dr Brundtland was elected and took up her post in Geneva, one of the first things she said was that our main challenge is not to deal with health ministers – because they know the problems. 
When Dr Brundtland was elected and took up her post in Geneva, one of the first things she said was that our main challenge is not to deal with health ministers – because they know the problems.
It is to try to get through to presidents, prime ministers and finance ministers, and give them this simple message: you too are health ministers. 
It is to try to get through to presidents, prime ministers and finance ministers, and give them this simple message: you too are health ministers.
We need to find new ways of portraying health expenditures as more than costs, but also as an investment. 
We need to find new ways of portraying health expenditures as more than costs, but also as an investment.
And we need to develop a new language and a new mindset that will enable us to reach and communicate with the real circles of power. 
And we need to develop a new language and a new mindset that will enable us to reach and communicate with the real circles of power.
Health professionals are too focused on their own field and have a limited ability to communicate with people in other sectors. 
Health professionals are too focused on their own field and have a limited ability to communicate with people in other sectors.
This is really an extension of conclusion of the Brundtland report, Our Common Future. 
This is really an extension of conclusion of the Brundtland report, Our Common Future.
We need to get to the core of the economic dimension and speak a language that people with power really understand. 
We need to get to the core of the economic dimension and speak a language that people with power really understand.
We need to establish a link between investing in health and improving the health status of the population – of the productive fabric of society. 
We need to establish a link between investing in health and improving the health status of the population – of the productive fabric of society.
We need to convince political leaders that if we do these things, there will be more to share. 
We need to convince political leaders that if we do these things, there will be more to share.
If they fail they will be wasting their opportunity as a political leader. 
If they fail they will be wasting their opportunity as a political leader.
This is in fact what brought us to Jeffrey Sachs. 
This is in fact what brought us to Jeffrey Sachs.
We wanted someone who could convene some of the world’s leading economists with experience in these areas to work on documenting what everybody could see – that if you are poor, you are more likely to have poor health. 
We wanted someone who could convene some of the world’s leading economists with experience in these areas to work on documenting what everybody could see – that if you are poor, you are more likely to have poor health.
But it is less well documented that poor health in itself breeds poverty, creating a vicious spiral. 
But it is less well documented that poor health in itself breeds poverty, creating a vicious spiral.
So we were convinced that we had to get this down on paper and document it and its implications. 
So we were convinced that we had to get this down on paper and document it and its implications.
Jeffrey Sachs’ commission presented the report at the end of the year 2000. 
Jeffrey Sachs’ commission presented the report at the end of the year 2000.
I am certain that the process we launched then contributed to the methodology used in devising the MDGs. 
I am certain that the process we launched then contributed to the methodology used in devising the MDGs.
The study documented how appropriate, timely action can save 8 to 10 million lives a year. 
The study documented how appropriate, timely action can save 8 to 10 million lives a year.
That in itself would be a real humanitarian gain. 
That in itself would be a real humanitarian gain.
But such action would also help to increase life spans, productivity and economic wellbeing, especially of the poor. 
But such action would also help to increase life spans, productivity and economic wellbeing, especially of the poor.
But the study also documented that this will not happen by itself. 
But the study also documented that this will not happen by itself.
There has been a prevailing idea that as long as countries continue to develop, health will simply follow. 
There has been a prevailing idea that as long as countries continue to develop, health will simply follow.
This is not the case. 
This is not the case.
So there is a need to scale up the spending on health, by the poor countries themselves, and by better targeting development assistance for health. 
So there is a need to scale up the spending on health, by the poor countries themselves, and by better targeting development assistance for health.
The report is particularly valuable because it demonstrated how affordable this operation could be. 
The report is particularly valuable because it demonstrated how affordable this operation could be.
It documented the difference it would make if rich countries devoted one tenth or one per cent of their gross national income to health-targeted development assistance for specific interventions. 
It documented the difference it would make if rich countries devoted one tenth or one per cent of their gross national income to health-targeted development assistance for specific interventions.
That would be an investment that would be repaid many times and save millions of lives every year, and it would provide economic development and global security. 
That would be an investment that would be repaid many times and save millions of lives every year, and it would provide economic development and global security.
There were many who criticised this approach, which is a good thing because it stimulated debate. 
There were many who criticised this approach, which is a good thing because it stimulated debate.
Many argued that there are too many vertical interventions, such as bed nets and vaccines. 
Many argued that there are too many vertical interventions, such as bed nets and vaccines.
And that the approach to health care should be much more horizontal. 
And that the approach to health care should be much more horizontal.
But these approaches can be combined. 
But these approaches can be combined.
Unless we have a massive focus on what is literally on our own doorstep, we can forget about the horizontal process, and about making tangible differences in health. 
Unless we have a massive focus on what is literally on our own doorstep, we can forget about the horizontal process, and about making tangible differences in health.
Another conclusion of the report was the importance of partnership – which I believe is really a key lesson. 
Another conclusion of the report was the importance of partnership – which I believe is really a key lesson.
Partnership is a simple word, but a very complex thing to practise. 
Partnership is a simple word, but a very complex thing to practise.
The Sachs Commission concluded that more development assistance should be targeted towards health, while poor countries should allocate more money for health over their budgets. 
The Sachs Commission concluded that more development assistance should be targeted towards health, while poor countries should allocate more money for health over their budgets.
It is only if this works together that it will make a difference. 
It is only if this works together that it will make a difference.
Partnerships between rich and poor, partnerships between the private and the public sectors. 
Partnerships between rich and poor, partnerships between the private and the public sectors.
Some said that this was going to be a great challenge for the UN. 
Some said that this was going to be a great challenge for the UN.
Why are we inviting the private sector in? 
Why are we inviting the private sector in?
Isn’t it the UN that has the mandate to do these kinds of things? 
Isn’t it the UN that has the mandate to do these kinds of things?
Remember that the idea of public-private partnerships still was quite new as it first emerged as an idea in the 1990s. 
Remember that the idea of public-private partnerships still was quite new as it first emerged as an idea in the 1990s.
We felt that in the WHO, working with Dr. Brundtland, the way she reached out to the private sector, was being criticised by those who said “it says in our mandate that we are the leaders in health”. 
We felt that in the WHO, working with Dr. Brundtland, the way she reached out to the private sector, was being criticised by those who said “it says in our mandate that we are the leaders in health”.
But let’s not forget that it was Kofi Annan himself who invited other sectors to join the global fund to fight AIDS, TB and malaria. 
But let’s not forget that it was Kofi Annan himself who invited other sectors to join the global fund to fight AIDS, TB and malaria.
To mobilise 10 billion dollars every year to make a difference. 
To mobilise 10 billion dollars every year to make a difference.
So if the UN had not embarked on that course, I think the idea would have been marginalised. 
So if the UN had not embarked on that course, I think the idea would have been marginalised.
There were a number of other areas that started to attract attention. 
There were a number of other areas that started to attract attention.
Vaccines for example. 
Vaccines for example.
A major effort by the WHO and UNICEF in the 1990s had brought coverage up to 80 per cent. 
A major effort by the WHO and UNICEF in the 1990s had brought coverage up to 80 per cent.
A very high level. 
A very high level.
But since 1990, there has been stagnation and almost status quo. 
But since 1990, there has been stagnation and almost status quo.
How do we mobilise a new campaign for vaccines? 
How do we mobilise a new campaign for vaccines?
How do we create new markets for malaria medicine? 
How do we create new markets for malaria medicine?