natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is a new chapter in our cooperation – and in our energy dialogue. 
This is a new chapter in our cooperation – and in our energy dialogue.
It takes time to develop a new petroleum region. 
It takes time to develop a new petroleum region.
Thirty-two years have passed since acreage in the Barents Sea was first opened for petroleum activities. 
Thirty-two years have passed since acreage in the Barents Sea was first opened for petroleum activities.
Thirty years have gone by since the discovery of the Snøhvit gas field, which entered into production in 2007. 
Thirty years have gone by since the discovery of the Snøhvit gas field, which entered into production in 2007.
The Goliat oil field was the second significant Norwegian discovery in the Barents Sea. 
The Goliat oil field was the second significant Norwegian discovery in the Barents Sea.
It was made in the year 2000 – nearly twenty years after the Snøhvit discovery. 
It was made in the year 2000 – nearly twenty years after the Snøhvit discovery.
We expect production to start this year. 
We expect production to start this year.
In recent years we have had discoveries clearly demonstrating the great potential for the future. 
In recent years we have had discoveries clearly demonstrating the great potential for the future.
Wells have been responsibly drilled for 30 years. 
Wells have been responsibly drilled for 30 years.
But this is still a petroleum region with great exploration potential. 
But this is still a petroleum region with great exploration potential.
According to the Petro Foresight 2030 report, investments and operating costs offshore northern Norway will in 2030 be on par with investments and operating costs in the North Sea. 
According to the Petro Foresight 2030 report, investments and operating costs offshore northern Norway will in 2030 be on par with investments and operating costs in the North Sea.
By 2040, northern Norway may have overtaken southwestern Norway as a petroleum region. 
By 2040, northern Norway may have overtaken southwestern Norway as a petroleum region.
The new discoveries in the Barents Sea, including promising oil discoveries in new areas, such as the Wisting field are encouraging. 
The new discoveries in the Barents Sea, including promising oil discoveries in new areas, such as the Wisting field are encouraging.
This year, we expect record levels of exploration activities. 
This year, we expect record levels of exploration activities.
In June last year, the Norwegian Government awarded 24 production licences in the 22nd licensing round on the Norwegian continental shelf – 20 in the Barents Sea and four in the Norwegian Sea. 
In June last year, the Norwegian Government awarded 24 production licences in the 22nd licensing round on the Norwegian continental shelf – 20 in the Barents Sea and four in the Norwegian Sea.
Also two Russian companies, Rosneft and Lukoil, were awarded licences in the Barents Sea. 
Also two Russian companies, Rosneft and Lukoil, were awarded licences in the Barents Sea.
Last summer the Norwegian parliament decided to open the Barents Sea South-East. 
Last summer the Norwegian parliament decided to open the Barents Sea South-East.
This includes previously disputed areas, and will require even closer dialogue between our countries. 
This includes previously disputed areas, and will require even closer dialogue between our countries.
The delimitation agreement between Norway and Russia in the Barents Sea includes provisions for cooperation between Norway and Russia in case an oil or gas discovery is made that could extend across the delimitation line. 
The delimitation agreement between Norway and Russia in the Barents Sea includes provisions for cooperation between Norway and Russia in case an oil or gas discovery is made that could extend across the delimitation line.
We have to cooperate to find practical solutions to challenges that may arise, as we have in the past. 
We have to cooperate to find practical solutions to challenges that may arise, as we have in the past.
One of the keys to continued responsible development of the resources in the north is improved maritime safety and emergency preparedness and response. 
One of the keys to continued responsible development of the resources in the north is improved maritime safety and emergency preparedness and response.
The Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic was signed by the eight Arctic states in Kiruna last May. 
The Agreement on Cooperation on Marine Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response in the Arctic was signed by the eight Arctic states in Kiruna last May.
This was only the second legally binding instrument negotiated among the Arctic Council member states. 
This was only the second legally binding instrument negotiated among the Arctic Council member states.
This important work is continuing in the Task Force on Arctic Marine Oil Pollution Prevention, which met in Oslo last week. 
This important work is continuing in the Task Force on Arctic Marine Oil Pollution Prevention, which met in Oslo last week.
Norway and Russia are leading the Task Force together. 
Norway and Russia are leading the Task Force together.
Hopefully we will be able present the results of its work at the next Ministerial meeting in 2015. 
Hopefully we will be able present the results of its work at the next Ministerial meeting in 2015.
In order to develop potential resources on both sides of the delimitation line in a cost-effective manner, industry competition will be key. 
In order to develop potential resources on both sides of the delimitation line in a cost-effective manner, industry competition will be key.
The challenges relating to costs and technology are substantial. 
The challenges relating to costs and technology are substantial.
This is a region in which no company or country can achieve it alone. 
This is a region in which no company or country can achieve it alone.
Cooperation is one of the keys to unlocking the region’s potential. 
Cooperation is one of the keys to unlocking the region’s potential.
Norway and Russia are natural partners in this endeavour. 
Norway and Russia are natural partners in this endeavour.
Russian companies already have licences on the Norwegian continental shelf. 
Russian companies already have licences on the Norwegian continental shelf.
Statoil and Rosneft have a cooperation agreement in Russia, and Norwegian companies are providing technological solutions for the Russian oil and gas industry. 
Statoil and Rosneft have a cooperation agreement in Russia, and Norwegian companies are providing technological solutions for the Russian oil and gas industry.
As much as a quarter of the technology in the Prirazlomnoye platform is Norwegian in origin. 
As much as a quarter of the technology in the Prirazlomnoye platform is Norwegian in origin.
The highest standards on health, safety and environment must be met to ensure sustainable development of the resources in the Arctic. 
The highest standards on health, safety and environment must be met to ensure sustainable development of the resources in the Arctic.
Finding technology that can withstand the severe climate conditions and meet the challenges of ice cover and long distances, as well as high environmental standards, is one of the main challenges when seeking to fully exploit the region’s potential as a future energy supply base. 
Finding technology that can withstand the severe climate conditions and meet the challenges of ice cover and long distances, as well as high environmental standards, is one of the main challenges when seeking to fully exploit the region’s potential as a future energy supply base.
The Norwegian oil and gas industry has world-class offshore technology, but as its activities move closer to the Arctic, it is encountering new challenges that require new and improved technology. 
The Norwegian oil and gas industry has world-class offshore technology, but as its activities move closer to the Arctic, it is encountering new challenges that require new and improved technology.
The Russian industry has equally long and valuable experience of contending with and managing severe climate conditions mainly onshore in the Arctic. 
The Russian industry has equally long and valuable experience of contending with and managing severe climate conditions mainly onshore in the Arctic.
This knowledge meets in the Barents sea. 
This knowledge meets in the Barents sea.
In our relations with Russia, developing and sharing knowledge are key. 
In our relations with Russia, developing and sharing knowledge are key.
As this conference has shown, the RU-NO Barents Project, which was launched by INTSOK in 2012 with the support of the Norwegian Government and the Norwegian and Russian oil and gas industry, is helping to address these challenges. 
As this conference has shown, the RU-NO Barents Project, which was launched by INTSOK in 2012 with the support of the Norwegian Government and the Norwegian and Russian oil and gas industry, is helping to address these challenges.
The RU-NO project adds industrial weight to Norwegian–Russian energy cooperation and has become a key part of our energy dialogue. 
The RU-NO project adds industrial weight to Norwegian–Russian energy cooperation and has become a key part of our energy dialogue.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as the coordinating Ministry for Norway’s Arctic policy, seeks to be a partner for industrial actors through initiatives such as this. 
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as the coordinating Ministry for Norway’s Arctic policy, seeks to be a partner for industrial actors through initiatives such as this.
Our close relations, high level of competence and industrial opportunities form an excellent basis for future cooperation. 
Our close relations, high level of competence and industrial opportunities form an excellent basis for future cooperation.
Oil and Gas 
Olje og gass
Address at Russian–Norwegian Oil and Gas Conference 
Innlegg på Intsoks norsk-russiske olje- og gasskonferanse
Tromsø, 21 January 2014 
Tromsø, 21. januar 2014
Address at “Heart of Asia” - Ministerial Conference on Afghanistan 
Innlegg på “Heart of Asia” - ministerkonferanse om Afghanistan
Kabul, 14 June 2012 
Kabul, 14. juni 2012
- We look forward to fruitful cooperation with the lead nations and participating countries and would welcome concrete proposals and suggestions for activities and projects, said State Secretary Torgeir Larsen at the conference in Kabul. 
- We look forward to fruitful cooperation with the lead nations and participating countries and would welcome concrete proposals and suggestions for activities and projects, sa statssekretær Torgeir Larsen bl.a under konferansen i Kabul.
Excellencies, Dear friends, 
Excellencies, Dear friends,
Allow me first of all to thank the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and Turkey for co-hosting this important meeting in the very heart of Asia. 
Allow me first of all to thank the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and Turkey for co-hosting this important meeting in the very heart of Asia.
Norway applauds the progress that has been made since last year’s Istanbul meeting. 
Norway applauds the progress that has been made since last year’s Istanbul meeting.
Regional commitment and cooperation are key in securing future stability and development in Afghanistan. 
Regional commitment and cooperation are key in securing future stability and development in Afghanistan.
Many of us have stressed this for years – but there has been more talk than action and commitment. 
Many of us have stressed this for years – but there has been more talk than action and commitment.
This is now changing. 
This is now changing.
The declaration adopted today shows that the statements from Istanbul are being translated into reality. 
The declaration adopted today shows that the statements from Istanbul are being translated into reality.
State Secretary Torgeir Larsen gives his address at the Istanbul- conference on Afghanistan. 
Statssekretær Torgeir Larsen holder innlegg under Istanbul- konferansen om Afghanistan.
(Photo: MFA Afghanistan) 
(Foto: Afghanistans UD)
This meeting is the second of a series of three very important international meetings on Afghanistan this spring and summer. 
This meeting is the second of a series of three very important international meetings on Afghanistan this spring and summer.
It serves as a bridge between Chicago and Tokyo, but it also underscores the critical value of regional cooperation in itself in the overall effort to bring security and stability to Afghanistan and to the region. 
It serves as a bridge between Chicago and Tokyo, but it also underscores the critical value of regional cooperation in itself in the overall effort to bring security and stability to Afghanistan and to the region.
Step by step processes of practical cooperation across borders – building confidence based on mutual accountability and commitments - enhancing regional stability and facilitating increased people-to-people contact. 
Step by step processes of practical cooperation across borders – building confidence based on mutual accountability and commitments - enhancing regional stability and facilitating increased people-to-people contact.
Norway has supported the Istanbul process from the very beginning. 
Norway has supported the Istanbul process from the very beginning.
We are also supporting concrete boarder area projects and Norway is committed to long-term cooperation with Afghanistan. 
We are also supporting concrete boarder area projects and Norway is committed to long-term cooperation with Afghanistan.
Our priority areas continue to be education, governance and rural development, while gender equality is a cross-cutting issue in our development cooperation. 
Our priority areas continue to be education, governance and rural development, while gender equality is a cross-cutting issue in our development cooperation.
These are priorities which go well with the seven initial confidence-building measures identified through the Istanbul process. 
These are priorities which go well with the seven initial confidence-building measures identified through the Istanbul process.
As to the CBMs, Norway will support the Disaster Management CBM and we are also ready to consider participating in the CBMs on regional infrastructure and education. 
As to the CBMs, Norway will support the Disaster Management CBM and we are also ready to consider participating in the CBMs on regional infrastructure and education.
In this context we look forward to fruitful cooperation with the lead nations and participating countries and would welcome concrete proposals and suggestions for activities and projects. 
In this context we look forward to fruitful cooperation with the lead nations and participating countries and would welcome concrete proposals and suggestions for activities and projects.
Oslo, 9 May 2011 
Stortinget, 9. mai 2011
- We must bear in mind that Security Council resolution 1973 contains no time limits. 
- Vi skal huske på at resolusjon 1973 ikke har noen tidsbegrensninger.
Nor have we stipulated a deadline for Norway’s support for the implementation of the resolution, Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said in his address to the Storting on 9 May 2011 on the situation in Libya and Norway’s participation in the international response. 
Vi har heller ikke satt noen tidsfrist for Norges støtte til gjennomføring av resolusjonen.
Check against delivery Translated from the Norwegian 
Sjekkes mot fremføringen.
Thank you for this opportunity to follow up the Prime Minister’s address in this chamber on 29 March with an update on the situation in Libya and the Norwegian and international efforts to protect the civilian population, alleviate the humanitarian situation and help to find a political solution to the conflict. 
Takk for denne anledningen til å følge opp statsministerens redegjørelse av 29. mars i år, for å gi en oppdatering både om utviklingen i Libya og om de norske og internasjonale bestrebelser for å beskytte sivilbefolkningen, avhjelpe den humanitære situasjonen og bidra til en politisk løsning på konflikten.
Norway is taking part in humanitarian, political and military operations in Libya. 
Norge har engasjert seg i Libya-konflikten humanitært, politisk og militært.
The conflict is complex and poses many dilemmas, and there is no simple, perfect solution. 
Konflikten er kompleks, med mange dilemmaer og ingen enkle, perfekte løsninger.
It is therefore both fitting and important that there is a broad and thorough debate on Norway’s participation in these operations, both in this chamber and in the public sphere. 
Det er derfor riktig og viktig at den norske innsatsen debatteres bredt og grundig, både i denne sal og ellers i det offentlige rom.
Norway’s military engagement enjoys the broad support of the Storting. 
Det norske militære engasjementet har fått bred støtte på Stortinget.
This is important, given that it is such a serious engagement, and it is important for our women and men who are participating in the operation. 
Det er viktig når det handler om et så alvorlig engasjement – og det er viktig for våre kvinner og menn som deltar i oppdraget.
Libya’s future now hangs in the balance. 
Vi står nå midt oppe i et oppgjør om Libyas fremtid.
For the people of the country it is a matter of getting rid of an authoritarian regime and ensuring participation in the political process and opportunities for development for the many rather than the few. 
For landets befolkning dreier det seg om å avvikle et autoritært regime og sikre medbestemmelse og utviklingsmuligheter for de mange i stedet for de få.
For us it is a matter of promoting fundamental values that we cherish: ensuring protection of civilians, assisting people in need, strengthening the UN and the international rule of law, and supporting key principles of international law that we ourselves have championed. 
For oss dreier det seg om å fremme dyptgripende verdier som vi tror på – å sikre beskyttelse av sivile, bistå mennesker i nød, styrke FN og den internasjonale rettsorden, samt å støtte sentrale folkerettslige prinsipper som vi – historisk sett – selv har vært med på å kjempe frem.
It is important to recall that the alternatives open to the international community when faced by the situation in Libya were far from ideal. 
Jeg vil minne om dette: Overfor situasjonen i Libya hadde verdenssamfunnet noen handlingsalternativer som var langt fra ideelle.
By far the worst course of action open to us was to do nothing. 
Det klart dårligste av dem alle, var å ikke gjøre noe.
The international community had reliable information indicating that an acute crisis was brewing for Libyan civilians. 
Verdenssamfunnet hadde solid informasjon om at en akutt nødssituasjon for Libyas befolkning var under oppseiling.
Gaddafi’s own pronouncements that he would crush all opposition by means of military force gave cause for grave concern. 
Gaddafis egne uttalelser om at han ville slå ned all opposisjon, med bruk av militær makt, var sterkt foruroligende.
The consequences of not taking action could have been disastrous for the civilian population. 
Konsekvensene av å ikke handle kunne ha blitt katastrofale for sivilbefolkningen.
Despite the fact that the situation in Libya today remains difficult and unresolved, and that civilians are still suffering due to internal hostilities, it is important to ask precisely what would have happened if we had not acted so decisively. 
På tross av at situasjonen i Libya i dag er vanskelig og uavklart, og sivile fortsatt utsettes for store prøvelser som følge av interne kamphandlinger, er det viktig å løfte frem akkurat dette spørsmålet: Hva ville alternativet ha vært, om vi ikke hadde vist handlekraft?
Sometimes military force is necessary as part of an overall effort to prevent abuses and attacks on civilians and lay the groundwork for peace and stability. 
Visse ganger er militære maktmidler påkrevd som del av en helhetlig innsats for å forhindre overgrep og legge grunnlaget for fred og stabilitet.
I understand that many commentators and others are asking: What about other brutal regimes? 
Jeg forstår at kommentatorer og andre spør – ja, hva med andre brutale regimer?
I admit that this is a dilemma and that there is no easy answer to this question. 
Jeg innrømmer at det er et dilemma, et spørsmål uten enkle svar.
But objections to intervening in just one critical situation cannot be a decisive argument for not intervening when the UN Security Council has in fact reached agreement on taking action in a particular case. 
Men det kan heller ikke være slik at manglende enighet om å gripe inn i én kritisk situasjon, skal være et avgjørende argument mot å gripe inn når FNs sikkerhetsråd faktisk samler seg.
After Security Council resolution 1973 was adopted, it was necessary to act quickly. 
Etter vedtaket av resolusjon 1973, måtte det handles raskt.
The Government made its decisions on the basis of our constitutional requirements. 
Regjeringen tok sine beslutninger basert på vårt konstitusjonelle rammeverk.
There was ongoing contact with the parties represented in the Storting. 
Fortløpende ble det holdt kontakt med partiene på Stortinget.
I would like to thank the leaders of the opposition parties for their cooperation during those critical days at the end of March. 
Jeg vil takke opposisjonspartienes ledere for samarbeidet gjennom de kritiske døgnene i slutten av mars.
The fact that there is broad-based consensus on foreign policy and that the Storting supported Norway’s participation in the operation is one of our country’s strengths. 
Det er en styrke for et land som Norge at utenrikspolitikken forankres bredt, og at Stortinget stilte seg bak norsk deltakelse i operasjonen.
They establish that a state’s authorities are responsible for protecting their own population, and confirm that use of military force against the state’s own population may constitute a threat to international peace and security. 
De slår fast at et lands myndigheter har ansvar for å beskytte egen befolkning mot overgrep, og de bekrefter at bruk av militær makt mot egen befolkning kan anses som en trussel mot internasjonal fred og sikkerhet.
Norway has long sought to ensure that the principle of non-interference set out in the UN Charter should not stand in the way of international intervention to protect a population from massive atrocities perpetrated by its own government. 
Norge har lenge arbeidet for at FN-paktens prinsipp om ikke-innblanding ikke skal kunne stå i veien for internasjonal inngripen for å beskytte befolkningen mot massive overgrep fra egne makthavere.
This understanding of the principle has now been further strengthened by these Security Council resolutions. 
Nå er dette prinsippet ytterligere styrket gjennom disse beslutningene i FNs sikkerhetsråd.
It is important for Norway that this development takes place within the framework of the UN and that it is not used as a pretext by individual countries and groups to take the law into their own hands without a mandate under international law. 
For Norge er det viktig at denne utviklingen skjer innenfor rammen av FN - og ikke blir et påskudd for enkeltland og grupper til å ta seg til rette uten folkerettslig mandat.
It is also historic that the international community authorised the use of military force to protect the civilian population of Libya once it had established that Gaddafi’s regime had no intention of complying with the requirement set out in Security Council resolution 1970 to end the violence against its own civilian population. 
Det er også historisk at det internasjonale samfunn – etter å ha slått fast at Gaddafis regime ikke hadde til hensikt å etterleve kravet i resolusjon 1970, om å stanse voldshandlingene mot sin egen befolkning - autoriserte bruk av militære tiltak for å beskytte sivilbefolkningen.
Resolutions 1970 and 1973 also give the international community a mandate to bring about a political process that fulfils the Libyan people’s legitimate demands for protection, participation and development. 
Resolusjonene 1970 og 1973 gir også det internasjonale samfunn et mandat for å utvirke en politisk prosess som kan besvare det libyske folkets legitime krav om beskyttelse, medbestemmelse og utvikling.