natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
More than anything, what the man on the screen needs is a safety net – not only to protect him from falling here and now, but to also to make him better equipped to meet future challenges. 
More than anything, what the man on the screen needs is a safety net – not only to protect him from falling here and now, but to also to make him better equipped to meet future challenges.
We must strive to achieve convergence in relation to risk reduction just as we are seeking to attain carbon footprint convergence. 
We must strive to achieve convergence in relation to risk reduction just as we are seeking to attain carbon footprint convergence.
No less. 
No less.
Before I conclude, I would like to thank our co-organisers UNDP and ProVention for their invaluable contribution to this policy forum. 
Before I conclude, I would like to thank our co-organisers UNDP and ProVention for their invaluable contribution to this policy forum.
I hope you will all find this working session useful and inspiring. 
I hope you will all find this working session useful and inspiring.
According to the information available so far, the demonstration was peaceful. 
Foreløpig informasjon tyder på at demonstrasjonen var fredelig.
‘I would like to convey my deepest sympathy to Ziad Abu Ein’s loved ones and to the Palestinian Authority,’ Mr Brende said. 
- Min dypeste medfølelse går til Ziad Abu Eins etterlatte og til palestinske myndigheter, sier Børge Brende.
‘I deeply deplore all use of excessive force against peaceful demonstrations. 
- Jeg tar sterk avstand fra overdreven maktbruk mot fredelige markeringer.
Norway calls on the Israeli authorities to carry out a transparent and credible investigation of this incident,’ said Mr Brende. 
Norge oppfordrer israelske myndigheter til å gjennomføre en åpen og troverdig gransking av denne hendelsen, sier utenriksministeren.
Grave concern over death of Palestinian minister 
Ser alvorlig på dødsfallet til palestinsk minister
“It is completely unacceptable that more than 500 people have been condemned to death in a summary trial. 
- Det er uakseptabelt at over 500 mennesker er dømt til døden i en summarisk rettssak.
The court’s judgment is shocking, and the conduct of the trial gives cause for concern about the fundamental standards of the Egyptian legal system,” said Minister of Foreign Affairs Børge Brende. 
Dommene er sjokkerende og rettssaken gir grunn til bekymring for grunnleggende standarder i det egyptiske rettssystemet, sier utenriksminister Børge Brende.
On Monday 24 March, 529 people were condemned to death by a court in Minya in Egypt. 
Mandag 24. mars ble 529 personer dømt til døden av en domstol i Minya i Egypt.
According to the defendants’ lawyers, they were not given the time or the opportunity to defend their clients properly, and only two court sessions were held before the verdict was handed down. 
Ifølge de tiltaltes advokater fikk de verken tid eller mulighet til å forsvare de dømte på tilfredsstillende vis, og det ble kun avholdt to rettsmøter før dommene ble avsagt.
The defendants now have an opportunity to appeal, and the verdict must have the approval of the Grand Mufti and the President before any executions can be carried out. 
Man venter nå på mulige anker, samt bekreftelse av stormuftien og presidenten før dommene kan fullbyrdes.
“I expect all the defendants to be given a fair opportunity to appeal the sentence, and that the question of guilt will be assessed individually for each defendant. 
- Jeg forventer at samtlige tiltalte gis muligheten til en rettferdig ankebehandling og at skyldspørsmålet vurderes individuelt for hver enkelt tiltalt.
Several other recent judgments in Egyptian courts have also made us question whether the right to due process is being upheld,” said the Foreign Minister. 
Vi har også sett flere andre domfellelser den siste tiden som reiser spørsmål ved rettssikkerheten i Egypt, sier utenriksministeren.
Thousands of people have been held in prison after the military takeover in Egypt in July 2013. 
Tusenvis er fengslet etter militærets maktovertakelse i Egypt i juli 2013.
Journalists have also been arrested and imprisoned. 
Journalister sitter også arrestert i egyptiske fengsler.
“Equality before the law and the rule of law are of fundamental importance for any society. 
- Likhet for loven og rettssikkerhet er grunnleggende i et samfunn.
I urge the Egyptian authorities to do their utmost to ensure respect for these values. 
Jeg vil oppfordre egyptiske myndigheter til å gjøre sitt ytterste for å påse at disse grunnverdiene sikres.
Norway opposes the death penalty in all circumstances, and I ask the Egyptian authorities to refrain from making any use of it,” said Mr Brende. 
Norge er mot dødsstraff i alle situasjoner, og jeg vil oppfordre egyptiske myndigheter til å ikke bruke denne straffemetoden, sier Brende.
“The period up to the presidential and parliamentary elections is a decisive one for Egypt. 
- Egypt er nå i en avgjørende periode frem mot president- og parlamentsvalg.
The country must demonstrate that it respects international principles of democracy, human rights and rule of law. 
Egypt må vise at de respekterer internasjonale prinsipper for demokrati, menneskerettigheter og rettsikkerhet.
New round of death sentences in Egypt 
Nye dødsdommer i Egypt
Death sentences in Egypt unacceptable 
Uakseptable dødsdommer i Egypt
The fight against the death penalty gains ground 
Kampen mot dødsstraff vinner terreng
Never before have so many UN member states supported the fight against the death penalty. 
Aldri før har så mange av FNs medlemsland sluttet opp om kampen mot dødsstraff.
“This is a very welcome development,” said Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide. 
– Det er svært gledelig, sier utenriksminister Espen Barth Eide.
The UN General Assembly Monday called on all member states to establish a moratorium on executions, as a step towards abolishing the death penalty. 
FNs generalforsamling oppfordret i går medlemslandene til å stanse henrettelser som et skritt mot å avskaffe dødsstraff.
Norway, in cooperation with a group of countries from all parts of the world, led the initiative, which was supported by 110 countries. 
Norge, i samarbeid med en gruppe land fra alle verdensdeler, ledet initiativet som ble støttet av hele 110 land.
This is the fourth time a resolution calling for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty has been approved, and each time it has gained increased support. 
Dette er fjerde gang resolusjonen vedtas, og hver gang har den fått økt oppslutning.
This shows that there is a global trend towards abolition of the death penalty. 
Det viser at det er en global trend i retning avskaffelse av dødsstraff.
A total of 150 of the UN’s 193 member states now refrain from using the death penalty. 
Hele 150 av FNs 193 medlemsland avstår fra å bruke dødsstraff.
We know for certain that 20 countries carried out executions in 2011. 
Man vet med sikkerhet at 20 land gjennomførte henrettelser i 2011.
“There are still a large number of cases involving use of the death penalty that go unreported. 
- Det er store mørketall omkring bruken av dødsstraff.
The text that was adopted today also calls on states to show greater transparency with regard to their use of the death penalty. 
Teksten som ble vedtatt oppfordrer også til større åpenhet om bruken av dødsstraff.
In the long term, this could foster an open debate based on facts,” said Mr Eide. 
Dette vil på sikt kunne føre til åpen debatt basert på fakta, sier utenriksminister Eide.
The fight against the death penalty is one of the priority areas of Norway’s human rights policy. 
Kampen mot dødsstraff er en av hovedprioriteringene i Norges menneskerettighetspolitikk.
Many countries need to take a long-term perspective, and in several cases a step-by-step approach is required,” Mr Eide said. 
For mange land må perspektivet være langsiktig, og i flere tilfeller kreves en skrittvis tilnærming, sier utenriksminister Eide.
Thirty-nine countries voted against the resolution in the UN General Assembly. 
39 land stemte imot initiativet i FNs generalforsamling.
Thirty-six abstained. 
36 land avsto.
“The results of the Ministerial Conference in Bali are very encouraging after many years of stalemate. 
- Resultatet fra ministerkonferansen på Bali er svært gledelig etter mange års stillstand.
How states abolish the death penalty 
How states abolish the death penalty
A publication by The International Commission against the Death Penalty. 
A publication by The International Commission against the Death Penalty.
Foreword by Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide 
Foreword by Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide
"Norway gives high priority to the fight against the death penalty, and we oppose the death penalty in all circumstances as a matter of principle. 
"Norway gives high priority to the fight against the death penalty, and we oppose the death penalty in all circumstances as a matter of principle.
Killing sanctioned by the state dehumanises society", Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide writes in his foreword in a publication by The International Commission against the Death Penalty. 
Killing sanctioned by the state dehumanises society", Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide writes in his foreword in a publication by The International Commission against the Death Penalty.
Killing sanctioned by the state dehumanises society. 
Killing sanctioned by the state dehumanises society.
It is not an effective deterrent, and we know that innocent people have been executed in a number of cases. 
It is not an effective deterrent, and we know that innocent people have been executed in a number of cases.
The death penalty is cruel and inhuman and we believe its abolition is essential in order to protect human dignity. 
The death penalty is cruel and inhuman and we believe its abolition is essential in order to protect human dignity.
Currently, an estimated 150 UN Member States have abolished the death penalty or have introduced a moratorium, either in law or in practice. 
Currently, an estimated 150 UN Member States have abolished the death penalty or have introduced a moratorium, either in law or in practice.
Moreover states that favour abolition of the death penalty have different legal systems and cultural and religious traditions. 
Moreover states that favour abolition of the death penalty have different legal systems and cultural and religious traditions.
Public support for the death penalty is diminishing. 
Public support for the death penalty is diminishing.
Nevertheless, governments need to take the lead in national debates on issues of this nature. 
Nevertheless, governments need to take the lead in national debates on issues of this nature.
Most countries that have abolished the death penalty have done so despite public opposition, and yet people in those countries have quickly come to accept this reform. 
Most countries that have abolished the death penalty have done so despite public opposition, and yet people in those countries have quickly come to accept this reform.
The more familiar people are with the facts surrounding the death penalty, the less resistant they are to its abolition. 
The more familiar people are with the facts surrounding the death penalty, the less resistant they are to its abolition.
It is therefore important for states to show greater transparency with regard to the use of the death penalty. 
It is therefore important for states to show greater transparency with regard to the use of the death penalty.
In the long term, this could foster an open debate based on facts. 
In the long term, this could foster an open debate based on facts.
The purpose of this publication is to give examples of how governments have proceeded in abolishing capital punishment and to provide guidelines for states considering such a move. 
The purpose of this publication is to give examples of how governments have proceeded in abolishing capital punishment and to provide guidelines for states considering such a move.
The aim has been to provide sound, practical and relevant guidelines that will inspire states to abolish the death penalty. 
The aim has been to provide sound, practical and relevant guidelines that will inspire states to abolish the death penalty.
The mandate of the International Commission against the Death Penalty (ICDP) is to reinforce the fight against the death penalty in all regions of the world. 
The mandate of the International Commission against the Death Penalty (ICDP) is to reinforce the fight against the death penalty in all regions of the world.
The ICDP aims to supplement the actions carried out by international and regional organisations, civil society and representatives of the political world. 
The ICDP aims to supplement the actions carried out by international and regional organisations, civil society and representatives of the political world.
Norway is honoured to support and assist the ICDP in its current role as president of the ICDP cross-regional support group. 
Norway is honoured to support and assist the ICDP in its current role as president of the ICDP cross-regional support group.
We are also pleased to be one of the main partners and sponsors of the Fifth World Congress against the Death Penalty, to be held in Madrid in June 2013. 
We are also pleased to be one of the main partners and sponsors of the Fifth World Congress against the Death Penalty, to be held in Madrid in June 2013.
It is no longer a question of if we will achieve full abolition, but of when. 
It is no longer a question of if we will achieve full abolition, but of when.
Following on from this it is natural to ask: Which countries will be the last to take this step? 
Following on from this it is natural to ask: Which countries will be the last to take this step?
Who will be the last to join the global trend? 
Who will be the last to join the global trend?
I hope that this publication will further strengthen the international movement away from the death penalty. 
I hope that this publication will further strengthen the international movement away from the death penalty.
Oslo, April 2013 
Oslo, April 2013
More information: http://www.icomdp.org/ 
More information: www.icomdp.org
The moratorium against executions that was introduced in 2008 came to an end on 30 June this year. 
Moratoriet som stoppet henrettelser av dødsdømte ble innført i 2008 og utløp 30. juni i år.
The new Government in Pakistan has indicated that it does not intend to extend the moratorium. 
Den nye regjeringen i Pakistan har signalisert at den ikke ønsker å forlenge moratoriet.
“Norway deeply deplores the use of the death penalty. 
- Norge tar sterk avstand fra bruken av dødsstraff.
We will raise this issue with the Pakistani Authorities and urge them in the strongest terms to extend the moratorium and work towards abolishing capital punishment in Pakistan,” said Mr Eide. 
Vi vil ta opp saken med pakistanske myndigheter og oppfordre dem på det sterkeste til å forlenge moratoriet og arbeide for opphevelse av dødsstraff i Pakistan, sier Eide.
In 2008, the previous Pakistani Government introduced a moratorium on executions of prisoners who have been sentenced to death. 
Den forrige pakistanske regjeringen innførte i 2008 et moratorium på henrettelser av dødsdømte i Pakistan.
With one exception, this has prevented executions. 
Med ett unntak har moratoriet hindret at dødsdømte er blitt henrettet.
Unfortunately, however, there has been no moratorium on passing the death sentence, and between 300 and 400 people are sentenced to death every year. 
Dessverre ble det ikke innført moratorium på idømmelse av dødsstraff, og mellom 300 og 400 personer blir idømt dødsstraff hvert år.
Norway is deeply engaged in efforts to combat the death penalty and is working for its universal abolition. 
Norge er dypt engasjert i arbeidet mot dødsstraff og arbeider for universell avskaffelse av straffeformen.
Norway was one of the main sponsors of the fifth World Congress Against the Death Penalty, which was held in Madrid from 12 to 15 June. 
Norge var én av hovedsponsorene bak den femte verdenskongressen mot dødsstraff, som fant sted i Madrid 12.-15. juni.
Statement at the 1st International Oslo Symposium on Death Penalty in Asia 
Innlegg på 1st International Oslo Symposium on Death Penalty in Asia
Oslo, 19 March 2010 
Oslo, 19. mars 2010
State Secretary Lahnstein underscored in his speech that research can contribute to showing us the effects of death penalty and thereby give us the best possible basis for our decision. 
Statssekretær Erik Lahnstein fremholdt at forskning kan vise oss effekten av dødsstraff og dermed gi stater bedre grunnlag for å beslutte om dødsstraff skal opprettholdes.
Norway holds the view that when the knowledge is on the table, abolition will be the natural choice. 
Norges standpunkt er at når kunnskap ligger på bordet, vil avskaffelse være det naturlige valget.
First of all to the organizers, thank you for your efforts in arranging this 1st International Oslo Symposium on Death Penalty in Asia. 
First of all to the organizers, thank you for your efforts in arranging this 1st International Oslo Symposium on Death Penalty in Asia.
We welcome the participants at this symposium coming from all over Asia – as well as from many other corners of the world. 
We welcome the participants at this symposium coming from all over Asia – as well as from many other corners of the world.
I would like to use this opportunity to take up a very important point. 
I would like to use this opportunity to take up a very important point.
This concerns the views and responsibilities of governments and the choice that governments have. 
This concerns the views and responsibilities of governments and the choice that governments have.
This is an important point, because some governments claim that they have no choice. 
This is an important point, because some governments claim that they have no choice.
Some states that still use death penalty claim that there is a too strong popular demand for revenge or retribution. 
Some states that still use death penalty claim that there is a too strong popular demand for revenge or retribution.
Many also insist that their traditions, values and religion make it virtually impossible to abolish the death penalty. 
Many also insist that their traditions, values and religion make it virtually impossible to abolish the death penalty.
Some also give economic arguments. 
Some also give economic arguments.
First and foremost they often claim that death penalty is an unavoidable evil. 
First and foremost they often claim that death penalty is an unavoidable evil.
They believe that it protects vulnerable individuals and ensures social stability. 
They believe that it protects vulnerable individuals and ensures social stability.
Although most do acknowledge that there is a risk of innocent people being executed and justice being undermined, again and again, they say that they have no choice. 
Although most do acknowledge that there is a risk of innocent people being executed and justice being undermined, again and again, they say that they have no choice.
The global shift over the last twenty years has brought about far greater freedom of choice for governments. 
The global shift over the last twenty years has brought about far greater freedom of choice for governments.
The arguments for this are many, 
The arguments for this are many,
I will mention four. 
I will mention four.
First: Research has shown that the death penalty does not prevent serious crime. 
First: Research has shown that the death penalty does not prevent serious crime.
Second: And even more impressive, we have seen that countries where the death penalty has been abolished have not suffered disastrous consequences. 
Second: And even more impressive, we have seen that countries where the death penalty has been abolished have not suffered disastrous consequences.
Indeed most have suffered no consequences at all with regard to stability or serious crime. 
Indeed most have suffered no consequences at all with regard to stability or serious crime.
Third: The public in the vast majority of these countries has in fact quickly accepted the abolition of the death penalty. 
Third: The public in the vast majority of these countries has in fact quickly accepted the abolition of the death penalty.
Almost no state have reinstated the death penalty. 
Almost no state have reinstated the death penalty.
I will turn to a last argument. 
I will turn to a last argument.
In my view the most remarkable: 
In my view the most remarkable:
The vast majority of countries have in fact relinquished the death penalty – 
The vast majority of countries have in fact relinquished the death penalty –
There are countries that have chosen to abolish death penalty in all geographical regions, both rich and poor countries, of all cultures, all values, all traditions and of all religions. 
There are countries that have chosen to abolish death penalty in all geographical regions, both rich and poor countries, of all cultures, all values, all traditions and of all religions.
There are countries that have abolished the death penalty and countries that have retained it in the Western hemisphere, in Asia, in Africa and in the Middle East. 
There are countries that have abolished the death penalty and countries that have retained it in the Western hemisphere, in Asia, in Africa and in the Middle East.
There is great variation in the practice of the death penalty among countries with the same dominant religions. 
There is great variation in the practice of the death penalty among countries with the same dominant religions.
This applies to areas of predominantly Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist – and secular faiths and practices. 
This applies to areas of predominantly Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist – and secular faiths and practices.
Each country seems indeed, to be free to chose, regardless of its economic status, cultural or religious belonging. 
Each country seems indeed, to be free to chose, regardless of its economic status, cultural or religious belonging.
The door is therefore open for greater freedom for all countries to choose not to take lives. 
The door is therefore open for greater freedom for all countries to choose not to take lives.
However, as we all know there is no absolute freedom, this freedom of choice is never absolute and is understood differently in different countries. 
However, as we all know there is no absolute freedom, this freedom of choice is never absolute and is understood differently in different countries.
What is the role of research in this field? 
What is the role of research in this field?
What research can do is to contribute to showing us the effects of death penalty and thereby give us the best possible basis for our decision. 
What research can do is to contribute to showing us the effects of death penalty and thereby give us the best possible basis for our decision.
Our view is that when the knowledge is on the table, abolition will be the natural choice. 
Our view is that when the knowledge is on the table, abolition will be the natural choice.
It is to understand not only that this freedom of choice must exist, but to understand better how the choice itself is understood by different actors nationally and internationally, against the back drop of their history. 
It is to understand not only that this freedom of choice must exist, but to understand better how the choice itself is understood by different actors nationally and internationally, against the back drop of their history.
I believe this symposium will further such understanding. 
I believe this symposium will further such understanding.
As for the government in Norway, 
As for the government in Norway,
We have pledged to work systematically and impartially to fight the death penalty in our relations with all states. 
We have pledged to work systematically and impartially to fight the death penalty in our relations with all states.