natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
But let me reverse the argument too: more people in the health care sector also need to engage foreign policy decision-makers. 
But let me reverse the argument too: more people in the health care sector also need to engage foreign policy decision-makers.
All too often it is as if health workers shield themselves from other schools of professional and academic thought. 
All too often it is as if health workers shield themselves from other schools of professional and academic thought.
We need more interaction. 
We need more interaction.
And this is the core of the second point I mentioned in the introduction: engaging in foreign policy is a necessary part of solving some of the most pressing global health issues facing us all. 
And this is the core of the second point I mentioned in the introduction: engaging in foreign policy is a necessary part of solving some of the most pressing global health issues facing us all.
My ambition is to use my time as foreign minister to forge new complementarities to the benefit of both global health and global security. 
My ambition is to use my time as foreign minister to forge new complementarities to the benefit of both global health and global security.
Let me elaborate on this point by means of five concrete observations of this foreign policy-health nexus: 
Let me elaborate on this point by means of five concrete observations of this foreign policy-health nexus:
One: States are key players in creating the demand that is necessary to motivate medical research and production essential to health improvements. 
One: States are key players in creating the demand that is necessary to motivate medical research and production essential to health improvements.
It is doubtful, for example, that much progress would have been made on combating the AIDS epidemic in Africa, if Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the UN and governments such as the US had not worked so hard – alongside the WHO - to establish the global fund to fight AIDS, TB and malaria. 
It is doubtful, for example, that much progress would have been made on combating the AIDS epidemic in Africa, if Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the UN and governments such as the US had not worked so hard – alongside the WHO - to establish the global fund to fight AIDS, TB and malaria.
Or take the campaigns for immunisation. 
Or take the campaigns for immunisation.
Thanks to major efforts by UNICEF and WHO to provide global access to vaccines, coverage was brought from a level of 15% to almost 80% by the 1990s - but then it stalled at that level. 
Thanks to major efforts by UNICEF and WHO to provide global access to vaccines, coverage was brought from a level of 15% to almost 80% by the 1990s - but then it stalled at that level.
By the late 1990s a new coalition of stakeholders, ranging from the UN, the World Bank and the pharmaceutical industry to ‘philanthropy’, represented by Bill Gates, joined forces to launch a new mobilisation for vaccination and immunisation. 
By the late 1990s a new coalition of stakeholders, ranging from the UN, the World Bank and the pharmaceutical industry to ‘philanthropy’, represented by Bill Gates, joined forces to launch a new mobilisation for vaccination and immunisation.
This coalition needed a government to manifest the dedication of states. 
This coalition needed a government to manifest the dedication of states.
Norway decided to seize the opportunity. 
Norway decided to seize the opportunity.
We engaged and invested in GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation – from the very beginning in 2000. 
We engaged and invested in GAVI – the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation – from the very beginning in 2000.
GAVI is traditional and modern at the same time. 
GAVI is traditional and modern at the same time.
Traditional, because it is a mechanism that mobilises donor funds. 
Traditional, because it is a mechanism that mobilises donor funds.
But also extremely modern and innovative in the way it disburses resources through a performance-driven system that measures real progress and creates lasting incentives for improving the health system. 
But also extremely modern and innovative in the way it disburses resources through a performance-driven system that measures real progress and creates lasting incentives for improving the health system.
In short, government intervention is required to compensate for market failures. 
In short, government intervention is required to compensate for market failures.
The market is important in driving innovation and helping supply meet demand, but this is far from enough to give hundreds of millions of poor people access to essential medicines. 
The market is important in driving innovation and helping supply meet demand, but this is far from enough to give hundreds of millions of poor people access to essential medicines.
Two: The growth of a global labour market has important indirect impacts on health in developing nations. 
Two: The growth of a global labour market has important indirect impacts on health in developing nations.
Many developed countries recruit health care workers from developing countries. 
Many developed countries recruit health care workers from developing countries.
This may be a good thing both for host countries and for health care professionals. 
This may be a good thing both for host countries and for health care professionals.
But one unfortunate effect is that it drains developing countries’ health systems of important human capital. 
But one unfortunate effect is that it drains developing countries’ health systems of important human capital.
Given the demographics of an aging western population and labour shortage in certain sectors, this situation is likely to become even more acute. 
Given the demographics of an aging western population and labour shortage in certain sectors, this situation is likely to become even more acute.
The international community will have to resolve the ethical and policy issues raised by this development. 
The international community will have to resolve the ethical and policy issues raised by this development.
Three: Intra-state violence and war is one of the most concrete threats to a population’s health. 
Three: Intra-state violence and war is one of the most concrete threats to a population’s health.
Combat deaths are only the most obvious cost. 
Combat deaths are only the most obvious cost.
It is estimated that for every soldier killed, 10 or more civilians die, and many more are injured. 
It is estimated that for every soldier killed, 10 or more civilians die, and many more are injured.
Conflict-related sexual violence has affected the physical and mental health of hundreds of thousands of women over the last decades. 
Conflict-related sexual violence has affected the physical and mental health of hundreds of thousands of women over the last decades.
It has had serious and lasting consequences for peace, stability and reconciliation efforts. 
It has had serious and lasting consequences for peace, stability and reconciliation efforts.
Moreover, conflicts have devastating effects on health care systems. 
Moreover, conflicts have devastating effects on health care systems.
Before the civil war in Liberia, there were 237 doctors in the country. 
Before the civil war in Liberia, there were 237 doctors in the country.
When peace was declared in 2003, only 23 remained. 
When peace was declared in 2003, only 23 remained.
That is why addressing conflicts and violence – a key domain of foreign policy – is a crucial health-promoting activity. 
That is why addressing conflicts and violence – a key domain of foreign policy – is a crucial health-promoting activity.
It could be more effective if foreign policy decision-makers understood this better – and acted at an earlier stage. 
It could be more effective if foreign policy decision-makers understood this better – and acted at an earlier stage.
Norway led the effort to negotiate a treaty to ban cluster munitions that have unacceptable humanitarian consequences. 
Norway led the effort to negotiate a treaty to ban cluster munitions that have unacceptable humanitarian consequences.
The treaty was signed in Oslo two years ago. 
The treaty was signed in Oslo two years ago.
It was a real piece of hard foreign policy negotiations. 
It was a real piece of hard foreign policy negotiations.
But the effort – like any other disarmament effort - could equally be characterised as a foreign-policy driven effort with clear public health yields. 
But the effort – like any other disarmament effort - could equally be characterised as a foreign-policy driven effort with clear public health yields.
Four: Many important health threats must be met by means far beyond the health sector’s domain. 
Four: Many important health threats must be met by means far beyond the health sector’s domain.
Take the tide of chronic diseases – or life-style diseases - now hitting most countries. 
Take the tide of chronic diseases – or life-style diseases - now hitting most countries.
Facing these challenges also means confronting powerful economic interests, such as the tobacco industry – as the WHO did under Dr Brundtland’s leadership. 
Facing these challenges also means confronting powerful economic interests, such as the tobacco industry – as the WHO did under Dr Brundtland’s leadership.
Five: The probable impact of global climate change on health. 
Five: The probable impact of global climate change on health.
Many of the most dangerous infectious diseases are highly sensitive to climate conditions. 
Many of the most dangerous infectious diseases are highly sensitive to climate conditions.
Global warming will allow them to expand their range and intensity. 
Global warming will allow them to expand their range and intensity.
This means that many of the countries with the least resources will face additional serious challenges - including a new tide of refugees. 
This means that many of the countries with the least resources will face additional serious challenges - including a new tide of refugees.
As a result, international support and cooperation will become even more important. 
As a result, international support and cooperation will become even more important.
So, having made the case for establishing closer links between health and foreign policy, where does this leave us? 
So, having made the case for establishing closer links between health and foreign policy, where does this leave us?
What more can we do? 
What more can we do?
Dr Brundtland made the point that her problem wasn’t so much dealing with the health ministers; they understood why health was important. 
Dr Brundtland made the point that her problem wasn’t so much dealing with the health ministers; they understood why health was important.
Her and our mission was rather to convince presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers and finance ministers that they too needed to see themselves as health ministers. 
Her and our mission was rather to convince presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers and finance ministers that they too needed to see themselves as health ministers.
Professions should come together and develop evidence and language that help decision-makers understand the point and the relevance: we need to continually underline – by arguments, experience, and research - the foreign policy implications of global health security. 
Professions should come together and develop evidence and language that help decision-makers understand the point and the relevance: we need to continually underline – by arguments, experience, and research - the foreign policy implications of global health security.
We can demonstrate that investing in health is more than a cost. 
We can demonstrate that investing in health is more than a cost.
If well managed, it has a return on investment in both money and human value, many times over. 
If well managed, it has a return on investment in both money and human value, many times over.
I have mentioned the Millennium Development Goals – and the review process that we have just completed. 
I have mentioned the Millennium Development Goals – and the review process that we have just completed.
This effort, although not perfect, has made a huge difference. 
This effort, although not perfect, has made a huge difference.
The recent G8 commitment to focus on child and maternal health is another splendid example, as is the UN Secretary-General’s global strategy for women’s and children’s health, which has mobilised pledges of almost USD 40 billion. 
The recent G8 commitment to focus on child and maternal health is another splendid example, as is the UN Secretary-General’s global strategy for women’s and children’s health, which has mobilised pledges of almost USD 40 billion.
We can also work as individual states or in smaller groups of states to promote such efforts. 
We can also work as individual states or in smaller groups of states to promote such efforts.
Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s work on MDGs 4 and 5 is a great example, as is President Obama’s global health initiative. 
Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s work on MDGs 4 and 5 is a great example, as is President Obama’s global health initiative.
Today, we see major advances in our combined efforts to address the spread of communicable diseases. 
Today, we see major advances in our combined efforts to address the spread of communicable diseases.
Much more needs to be done, however, to mobilise against the slow tide of life style diseases that will kill millions and drain state budgets in the years to come. 
Much more needs to be done, however, to mobilise against the slow tide of life style diseases that will kill millions and drain state budgets in the years to come.
Third, all of the many initiatives taken – inside and outside the UN family - will require a closer look at the institutional global health architecture. 
Third, all of the many initiatives taken – inside and outside the UN family - will require a closer look at the institutional global health architecture.
This must be, I would imagine, a dream subject for any case study here at the Harvard Kennedy School! 
This must be, I would imagine, a dream subject for any case study here at the Harvard Kennedy School!
When I became foreign minister five years ago, I reached out to my colleagues from Brazil, France, Indonesia, Senegal, South Africa and Thailand – countries representing real diversity in terms of experience – and we met on the margins of the UN General Assembly to create the Foreign Policy and Global Health Initiative. 
When I became foreign minister five years ago, I reached out to my colleagues from Brazil, France, Indonesia, Senegal, South Africa and Thailand – countries representing real diversity in terms of experience – and we met on the margins of the UN General Assembly to create the Foreign Policy and Global Health Initiative.
In March 2007, we met again in Oslo to adopt the Oslo Declaration and action plan on global health. 
In March 2007, we met again in Oslo to adopt the Oslo Declaration and action plan on global health.
It identified 10 key policy areas where we believed the international community needed to better understand the health implications of foreign policy. 
It identified 10 key policy areas where we believed the international community needed to better understand the health implications of foreign policy.
The initiative continues to grow in strength. 
The initiative continues to grow in strength.
At expert level, the group meets regularly, and is currently chaired by Brazil. 
At expert level, the group meets regularly, and is currently chaired by Brazil.
Later this week, the UN General Assembly will adopt its annual foreign policy and global health (FPGH) resolution, co-sponsored by a record number of countries, including three important newcomers: the US, China and India. 
Later this week, the UN General Assembly will adopt its annual foreign policy and global health (FPGH) resolution, co-sponsored by a record number of countries, including three important newcomers: the US, China and India.
And finally, we need more knowledge and better documentation. 
And finally, we need more knowledge and better documentation.
What we now need is an interconnected research model that can create the necessary evidence base and help support our efforts. 
What we now need is an interconnected research model that can create the necessary evidence base and help support our efforts.
We need events like this – where foreign policy researchers, public health analysts, decision-makers and medical practitioners come together to discuss challenges and solutions. 
We need events like this – where foreign policy researchers, public health analysts, decision-makers and medical practitioners come together to discuss challenges and solutions.
We need to reach out to a new generation of researchers and policy planners, and integrate these perspectives into their world view. 
We need to reach out to a new generation of researchers and policy planners, and integrate these perspectives into their world view.
I am happy to announce today that Norway and the Foreign Policy Health Initiative will be supporting a new collaborative research project involving Harvard and five institutions in Norway, South Africa, Brazil and Indonesia – a collaborative project seeking to better understand the impact of various foreign policy domains on health, and what methods we should use to promote global health solutions in international politics. 
I am happy to announce today that Norway and the Foreign Policy Health Initiative will be supporting a new collaborative research project involving Harvard and five institutions in Norway, South Africa, Brazil and Indonesia – a collaborative project seeking to better understand the impact of various foreign policy domains on health, and what methods we should use to promote global health solutions in international politics.
We are also exploring the possibility of supporting a joint Lancet and University of Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health as a way of further promoting cross-disciplinary research and exchange. 
We are also exploring the possibility of supporting a joint Lancet and University of Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health as a way of further promoting cross-disciplinary research and exchange.
These are promising steps, and I am proud to have played a small role in them. 
These are promising steps, and I am proud to have played a small role in them.
But to be honest, nothing could make me happier than if one of you were to stand here in let us say 25 years, and be able to tell the next generation of policy-makers and health practitioners that the achievements of your generation have far eclipsed those of my own. 
But to be honest, nothing could make me happier than if one of you were to stand here in let us say 25 years, and be able to tell the next generation of policy-makers and health practitioners that the achievements of your generation have far eclipsed those of my own.
For questions after the speech ; http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Global-Health-Diplomacy/">see Harvard's web site. 
For spørsmålsrunden etter Støre tale ; http://www.iop.harvard.edu/Multimedia-Center/All-Videos/Global-Health-Diplomacy/">se Harvards nettsider.
Norway launches research collaboration on foreign policy and global health 
Nytt forskningssamarbeid på utenrikspolitikk og helse
Leading by example – Protecting the most vulnerable during the economic crisis 
Leading by example – Protecting the most vulnerable during the economic crisis
Or, to use Jeff Sachs words, to scale up further, Foreign Minister Støre said in his speech in the UN in New York 15 June 2009. 
Or, to use Jeff Sachs words, to scale up further.”
Based on a transcript of the speech 
Based on a transcript of the speech
Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, Director General, Excellencies and friends, 
Secretary General, Deputy Secretary General, Director General, Excellencies and friends,
I am the Norwegian Foreign Minister, for those of you who do not know me. 
I am the Norwegian Foreign Minister, for those of you who do not know me.
It is a great privilege to be associated with this luncheon, and on behalf of my Prime Minister, and the Norwegian Government, I am happy to be here to pledge Norway’s full support to the green publication that we have in front of us, which is a unique – I believe a quite unique – assembly of political will, and I will make a few remarks on this report, as an introduction to our discussion. 
It is a great privilege to be associated with this luncheon, and on behalf of my Prime Minister, and the Norwegian Government, I am happy to be here to pledge Norway’s full support to the green publication that we have in front of us, which is a unique – I believe a quite unique – assembly of political will, and I will make a few remarks on this report, as an introduction to our discussion.
I feel that we are standing at a crossroads where two major trends are about to collide. 
I feel that we are standing at a crossroads where two major trends are about to collide.
One is the trend of hope, and the other is the trend of despair. 
One is the trend of hope, and the other is the trend of despair.
And it is really up to us, and the political will that we have in this publication, to determine how we will manage that confrontation, so to say. 
And it is really up to us, and the political will that we have in this publication, to determine how we will manage that confrontation, so to say.
I had the privilege, 10 years ago, of working in WHO with the then Director General, Dr Brundtland, and alongside Julio Frenk, David Nabarro, Tore Godal, and a number of other friends at this luncheon. 
I had the privilege, 10 years ago, of working in WHO with the then Director General, Dr Brundtland, and alongside Julio Frenk, David Nabarro, Tore Godal, and a number of other friends at this luncheon.
And if we look at what has happened since the late nineties and the early part of this decade, in terms of innovation and tremendous progress in the area of global health, I think we have some reason to be – not proud – but satisfied that there has been such progress and impatience to move forward. 
And if we look at what has happened since the late nineties and the early part of this decade, in terms of innovation and tremendous progress in the area of global health, I think we have some reason to be – not proud – but satisfied that there has been such progress and impatience to move forward.
Or, to use Jeff Sachs words, to scale up further. 
Or, to use Jeff Sachs words, to scale up further.
We have seen new ways of working together, new partnerships, private-public, innovative ways of mobilising resources, a great undertaking in the GAVI Alliance – the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization – with the noble task of immunising every child in the world. 
We have seen new ways of working together, new partnerships, private-public, innovative ways of mobilising resources, a great undertaking in the GAVI Alliance – the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization – with the noble task of immunising every child in the world.
We have seen a rollback of malaria, speeding up work to cover children, saving them from a completely unnecessary death. 
We have seen a rollback of malaria, speeding up work to cover children, saving them from a completely unnecessary death.
We have seen the Global Fund mobilising resources, and we have seen the UN, Mr Secretary General, going through this phase, being a very close partner with all these initiatives. 
We have seen the Global Fund mobilising resources, and we have seen the UN, Mr Secretary General, going through this phase, being a very close partner with all these initiatives.
It has not been easy, because one could have advocated that all those initiatives, that all that money should have gone to the UN. 
It has not been easy, because one could have advocated that all those initiatives, that all that money should have gone to the UN.
That would have been according to the book. 
That would have been according to the book.
But if that had been a requirement, we would not have managed. 
But if that had been a requirement, we would not have managed.