natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There are currently many countries that disproportionately emphasize control and strict punishment for drug-related crimes, including the death penalty. 
I dag er det mange land som for ensidig vektlegger kontroll og strenge straffer for narkotikakriminalitet, også dødsstraff.
- Norway will emphasize that human rights must be respected in drug policy and show clear opposition to the use of the death penalty, says Høie. 
- Norge vil understreke at menneskerettighetene skal respekteres i narkotikapolitikken og markere tydelig motstand mot bruk av dødsstraff, sier Høie.
Some countries have considerable challenges related to illicit drug production and smuggling, involving violent cartels, corruption and money-laundering. 
Noen land har store problemer med narkotikaproduksjon og smugling, med voldelige karteller, korrupsjon og hvitvasking.
Norway will support measures to streamline the cooperation against organized drug crime. 
Norge vil støtte tiltak for å effektivisere samarbeidet mot organisert narkotikakriminalitet.
- At the same time, we will work to promote the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals with an emphasis on good governance. 
- Samtidig vil vi jobbe for å fremme FNs bærekraftsmål med vekt på godt styresett.
We know that this is an important prerequisite for development, health, rights, alternatives to illicit drug production and efforts against organized crime, says Høie. 
Vi vet at det er en viktig premiss for utvikling, helse, rettigheter, alternativer til narkotikaproduksjon og innsats mot organisert kriminalitet, sier Høie.
Another important issue for Norway is to ensure that patients have access to medications that contain controlled substances. 
En annen sak som er viktig for Norge er å sikre pasienter tilgang til medisiner som inneholder narkotiske stoffer.
In many countries, patients do not have access to such medications. 
I mange land får ikke pasienter tilgang på slike medisiner.
This may be important for treatment, for example as pain relief for cancer patients. 
Dette kan være viktig i behandlingen, for eksempel til smertelindring for pasienter som har kreft.
Norway is organizing a side-event on this topic during UNGASS and the Minister will make a statement and chair the debate. 
Norge arrangerer et sidearrangement om dette under UNGASS og statsråden holder innlegg og leder diskusjonen.
Read minister Høies speeches attanding UNGASS 2016: 
Les Høies taler på UNGASS 2016:
Høie in UN: 
Høie i FN:
Drug use is a health issue 
Bruk av narkotika er et helseproblem
Improved human rights protection in Europe 
Bedre beskyttelse av menneskerettighetene i Europa
“We welcome the decision of the State Duma. 
- Vedtaket i statsdumaen er gledelig.
We have waited for this for a long time. 
Dette har vi ventet på lenge.
Now I expect Russia to ratify the protocol in the near future. 
Nå forventer jeg at Russland ratifiserer protokollen i nær fremtid.
This will be important in order to enable the European Court of Human Rights to contribute effectively to human rights protection in Europe,” said Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. 
Det vil være viktig for at domstolen i Strasbourg kan bidra effektivt til å sikre menneskerettighetene i Europa, sier utenriksminister Jonas Gahr Støre.
The Court is in danger of collapsing due to an explosive growth in the number of applications to the Court. 
Domstolen står i fare for å bryte sammen som følge av en eksplosiv vekst i antall klagesaker.
Protocol No. 14 will simplify the Court’s procedures in clear-cut cases and make it more efficient. 
Protokoll 14 vil forenkle domstolens behandling av opplagte saker og gjøre domstolen mer effektiv.
“Norway has repeatedly urged Russia to ratify the protocol. 
- Norge har gjentatte ganger oppfordret Russland til å ratifisere protokollen.
Both the Prime Minister and I have raised this matter with our Russian counterparts. 
Både statsministeren og jeg har tatt opp saken med våre russiske motparter.
The Duma’s decision on Friday is a positive signal of continued support for the European human rights system,” said Mr Støre. 
Dumaens vedtak fredag er et positivt signal om fortsatt støtte til det europeiske menneskerettssystemet, sier Støre
Durban Review Conference, Geneva 20 April 2009 
FNs tilsynskonferanse mot rasisme, Genéve 20. april 2009
- I decided to attend this conference to convey Norway’s views. 
- I decided to attend this conference to convey Norway’s views.
We who have made a point of defending freedom of expression cannot opt for non-attendance as a strategy, leaving the floor to precisely those who hold opposite views. 
We who have made a point of defending freedom of expression cannot opt for non-attendance as a strategy, leaving the floor to precisely those who hold opposite views.
We will not surrender the floor of the United Nations to the extremists, said Støre in his statement. 
We will not surrender the floor of the United Nations to the extremists, sa utenriksminister Støre.
Check against delivery (the statement at web-tv) 
Check against delivery (talen på nett-tv)
Mr President, Excellencies, Ladies and gentlemen 
Mr President, Excellencies, Ladies and gentlemen
This is the rostrum of the United Nations. 
This is the rostrum of the United Nations.
By definition it is a rostrum for freedom of speech – crucial among the human rights. 
By definition it is a rostrum for freedom of speech – crucial among the human rights.
The President of Iran has just exercised that human right. 
The President of Iran has just exercised that human right.
He did so, I believe, in a way that threatens the very focus of this conference. 
He did so, I believe, in a way that threatens the very focus of this conference.
Today we meet on the basis of a declaration that has been carefully negotiated by our representatives. 
Today we meet on the basis of a declaration that has been carefully negotiated by our representatives.
It has succeeded in building a broad consensus, bringing on board all states and groups of states. 
It has succeeded in building a broad consensus, bringing on board all states and groups of states.
In his intervention the President of Iran placed his country outside the margins of this declaration. 
In his intervention the President of Iran placed his country outside the margins of this declaration.
Freedom of speech – yes. 
Freedom of speech – yes.
But the document that we have agreed is also clear on the need for protection against the incitement of hatred. 
But the document that we have agreed is also clear on the need for protection against the incitement of hatred.
I heard the messages in the President’s speech – and they amount to just that: incitement of hatred, spreading politics of fear and promoting an indiscriminate message of intolerance. 
I heard the messages in the President’s speech – and they amount to just that: incitement of hatred, spreading politics of fear and promoting an indiscriminate message of intolerance.
The declaration that we have agreed is not a finger-pointing exercise, it is not a list of one conflict after another. 
The declaration that we have agreed is not a finger-pointing exercise, it is not a list of one conflict after another.
Today’s declaration is principled. 
Today’s declaration is principled.
We know there are many conflicts – too many conflicts – around the world between countries and within countries. 
We know there are many conflicts – too many conflicts – around the world between countries and within countries.
The text aims at protecting people and individuals against the scourges of racism, discrimination and incitement to hatred. 
The text aims at protecting people and individuals against the scourges of racism, discrimination and incitement to hatred.
The Iranian President’s allegations run counter to the very spirit and dignity of this conference. 
The Iranian President’s allegations run counter to the very spirit and dignity of this conference.
I will not respond to all the allegations. 
I will not respond to all the allegations.
Through his message the President has made Iran the odd man out. 
Through his message the President has made Iran the odd man out.
And Norway will not accept that the odd man out hijacks the collective effort of the many. 
And Norway will not accept that the odd man out hijacks the collective effort of the many.
The point of departure that has brought us to Geneva is our common obligation to fight racism. 
The point of departure that has brought us to Geneva is our common obligation to fight racism.
This obligation is pressing. 
This obligation is pressing.
Because racism degrades us as human beings. 
Because racism degrades us as human beings.
Racial discrimination is a denial of human rights. 
Racial discrimination is a denial of human rights.
With this as our point of departure, it should be easy to agree on a final outcome document from this conference. 
With this as our point of departure, it should be easy to agree on a final outcome document from this conference.
We know, however, that agreeing on this has been anything but easy. 
We know, however, that agreeing on this has been anything but easy.
We learned this lesson in Durban eight years ago. 
We learned this lesson in Durban eight years ago.
The debates and various manifestations at the NGO forum in 2001 descended into a clamour of conflicting messages and extreme statements. 
The debates and various manifestations at the NGO forum in 2001 descended into a clamour of conflicting messages and extreme statements.
In some circles Durban was remembered more for the outrageousness of some of the statements than for the content of the document that was adopted at the conference. 
In some circles Durban was remembered more for the outrageousness of some of the statements than for the content of the document that was adopted at the conference.
Let us not forget that the Durban declaration was accepted by near consensus. 
Let us not forget that the Durban declaration was accepted by near consensus.
In my country it served as a point of reference for the elaboration of detailed action plans to combat racism and discrimination. 
In my country it served as a point of reference for the elaboration of detailed action plans to combat racism and discrimination.
The run-up to this review conference has not been easy either. 
The run-up to this review conference has not been easy either.
A few months ago we had before us a text marred by brackets and conflicting statements – detracting from the vital message we are seeking to convey: namely that racism in all its forms must be fought. 
A few months ago we had before us a text marred by brackets and conflicting statements – detracting from the vital message we are seeking to convey: namely that racism in all its forms must be fought.
Norway for its part defined five key objectives as we embarked on the final stretch of the preparations: 
Norway for its part defined five key objectives as we embarked on the final stretch of the preparations:
First, we wanted a strong and unequivocal text against racism. 
First, we wanted a strong and unequivocal text against racism.
We could not accept the text being taken hostage by a whole array of unrelated issues. 
We could not accept the text being taken hostage by a whole array of unrelated issues.
Second, we could not accept a text that called for restrictions on the defamation of religions. 
Second, we could not accept a text that called for restrictions on the defamation of religions.
Human rights obligations protect individuals, not religions. 
Human rights obligations protect individuals, not religions.
It is within the scope of freedom of expression to criticise both gods and religions. 
It is within the scope of freedom of expression to criticise both gods and religions.
Third, we could not accept a text that would infringe on freedom of expression as defined in Articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 
Third, we could not accept a text that would infringe on freedom of expression as defined in Articles 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Without freedom of expression, we cannot fight racism or human rights violations. 
Without freedom of expression, we cannot fight racism or human rights violations.
In short, we cannot compromise on the hard-won gains made in the field of universal human rights. 
In short, we cannot compromise on the hard-won gains made in the field of universal human rights.
Fourth, we wanted a text that recognises the role of the free media in fighting racism, while recalling that the media also has a responsibility to refrain from inciting to hatred and violence. 
Fourth, we wanted a text that recognises the role of the free media in fighting racism, while recalling that the media also has a responsibility to refrain from inciting to hatred and violence.
Fifth, we wanted a text of universal scope so as to avoid spotlighting the significance of one particular conflict, for instance by singling out the Middle East as a special case in point. 
Fifth, we wanted a text of universal scope so as to avoid spotlighting the significance of one particular conflict, for instance by singling out the Middle East as a special case in point.
And finally, we could not accept a text that would attempt to rewrite history. 
And finally, we could not accept a text that would attempt to rewrite history.
Some have attempted to repudiate the terrible lessons from the Holocaust. 
Some have attempted to repudiate the terrible lessons from the Holocaust.
That is unacceptable. 
That is unacceptable.
The Holocaust originated in the minds of men. 
The Holocaust originated in the minds of men.
It was not a natural disaster. 
It was not a natural disaster.
It was a man-made disaster. 
It was a man-made disaster.
This is now reflected in the declaration. 
This is now reflected in the declaration.
Let me reiterate: 
Let me reiterate:
It is Norway’s position that the fight against racism and racial discrimination is of the utmost importance. 
It is Norway’s position that the fight against racism and racial discrimination is of the utmost importance.
It is Norway’s position that the follow-up conference to Durban should send a strong and comprehensive message to that effect. 
It is Norway’s position that the follow-up conference to Durban should send a strong and comprehensive message to that effect.
And it is Norway’s position that this is the purpose of the UN – to bring together the nations of the world, in all their diversity, to reach a consensus, a common platform. 
And it is Norway’s position that this is the purpose of the UN – to bring together the nations of the world, in all their diversity, to reach a consensus, a common platform.
All countries – my own included – have their red lines, lines that they cannot accept being crossed. 
All countries – my own included – have their red lines, lines that they cannot accept being crossed.
Now we have reached the end station. 
Now we have reached the end station.
We have a text. 
We have a text.
We read that text as a strong message on racism and racial discrimination. 
We read that text as a strong message on racism and racial discrimination.
That text is well within our red lines. 
That text is well within our red lines.
Thus, Norway is ready to accept the text as it stands. 
Thus, Norway is ready to accept the text as it stands.
Exaggeration, digressions and extreme statements from this floor can not change that fact. 
Exaggeration, digressions and extreme statements from this floor can not change that fact.
I congratulate the delegates who have worked so hard to achieve this balanced result, in particular the Russian Chair of the Intersessional Working Group, Yuri Boichenko, and of course the High Commissioner for Human Rights for her tireless efforts in preparing this conference. 
I congratulate the delegates who have worked so hard to achieve this balanced result, in particular the Russian Chair of the Intersessional Working Group, Yuri Boichenko, and of course the High Commissioner for Human Rights for her tireless efforts in preparing this conference.
And I salute all those who worked in good faith to reach consensus, all those who were ready to compromise on details to achieve a greater good. 
And I salute all those who worked in good faith to reach consensus, all those who were ready to compromise on details to achieve a greater good.
Let me end by broadening the perspective: 
Let me end by broadening the perspective:
Fighting racism is one of the contemporary struggles confronting humanity. 
Fighting racism is one of the contemporary struggles confronting humanity.
There are many more such struggles, ranging from negotiations on disarmament and non-proliferation to negotiations on combating climate change and the whole array of issues related to the fight against poverty. 
There are many more such struggles, ranging from negotiations on disarmament and non-proliferation to negotiations on combating climate change and the whole array of issues related to the fight against poverty.
The method available to us to advance on these critical issues is to come together and seek common ground. 
The method available to us to advance on these critical issues is to come together and seek common ground.
Again, this is why we have the United Nations: to host and promote such efforts. 
Again, this is why we have the United Nations: to host and promote such efforts.
If our goal is to reach global agreement on global challenges – and we are constantly reiterating that this is crucial – then we need to continue to invest in the multilateral path. 
If our goal is to reach global agreement on global challenges – and we are constantly reiterating that this is crucial – then we need to continue to invest in the multilateral path.
Our method must be principled dialogue. 
Our method must be principled dialogue.
The alternative is monologue. 
The alternative is monologue.
That takes us nowhere. 
That takes us nowhere.
We owe it to our constituencies to engage actively and to make every effort to succeed, and we need to do so in good faith. 
We owe it to our constituencies to engage actively and to make every effort to succeed, and we need to do so in good faith.
The text as it was agreed last week is a result of a process conducted in good faith. 
The text as it was agreed last week is a result of a process conducted in good faith.
Against this background I regret that some states decided at the last minute to withdraw. 
Against this background I regret that some states decided at the last minute to withdraw.
I urge all participating states to stand by this laudable result. 
I urge all participating states to stand by this laudable result.
I agree with those who see it as an accomplishment for all those who are aiming to build a world free of all forms of discrimination. 
I agree with those who see it as an accomplishment for all those who are aiming to build a world free of all forms of discrimination.
I decided to attend this conference to convey Norway’s views. 
I decided to attend this conference to convey Norway’s views.
We will not surrender the floor of the United Nations to the extremists. 
We will not surrender the floor of the United Nations to the extremists.
Let us not forget that a conference alone will not solve the problems of racism and discrimination in our societies. 
Let us not forget that a conference alone will not solve the problems of racism and discrimination in our societies.
These issues are too complex to resolve in a single action plan or conference. 
These issues are too complex to resolve in a single action plan or conference.
They concern how we behave and interrelate as human beings. 
They concern how we behave and interrelate as human beings.
We need to follow up the outcome document and use it as a common point of reference and source of inspiration. 
We need to follow up the outcome document and use it as a common point of reference and source of inspiration.
If that can be achieved, then the Durban II Conference will stand the test of history. 
If that can be achieved, then the Durban II Conference will stand the test of history.
Arctic Frontiers 2011: DVD on Roald Amundsen’s South Pole Expedition 1910-12 
Arctic Frontiers 2011: DVD on Roald Amundsen’s South Pole Expedition 1910-12
Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre had this welcome greetings to the DVD on Roald Amundsen's South Pole Expedition 1910-12. 
Utenriksminister Jonas Gahr Støre skrev denne velkomsthilsenen til DVDen om Roald Amundsens sydpolekspedisjon 1910-12.
Oslo, January 2011 
Oslo, January 2011
Dear conference participant 
Dear conference participant
Welcome to Arctic Frontiers 2011. 
Welcome to Arctic Frontiers 2011.
In Norway, 2011 will be celebrated as the Nansen-Amundsen Year, marking the 150th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian scientist, diplomat, humanist and Nobel laureate Fridtjof Nansen, and the 100th anniversary of the first Antarctic expedition to reach the South Pole, led by the Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen. 
In Norway, 2011 will be celebrated as the Nansen-Amundsen Year, marking the 150th anniversary of the birth of the Norwegian scientist, diplomat, humanist and Nobel laureate Fridtjof Nansen, and the 100th anniversary of the first Antarctic expedition to reach the South Pole, led by the Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen.
Enclosed is a DVD containing footage from Amundsen’s South Pole expedition in 1910-12. 
Enclosed is a DVD containing footage from Amundsen’s South Pole expedition in 1910-12.
The film is part of the UNESCO international Memory of the World programme, a register of documentary heritage of particularly great value to humanity as a whole. 
The film is part of the UNESCO international Memory of the World programme, a register of documentary heritage of particularly great value to humanity as a whole.
A book will also follow that shows the historical context of the films and photographs. 
A book will also follow that shows the historical context of the films and photographs.
Yours sincerely Jonas Gahr Støre 
Yours sincerely Jonas Gahr Støre
E-vote project evaluation is ready 
Evalueringa frå e-valsforsøket er klar
The evaluation of the Internet voting pilot project in ten municipalities in the autumn 2011 elections is now ready. 
Evalueringa av forsøket med internettrøysting i ti kommunar ved valet hausten 2011 er no klar.
“The reports give us valuable knowledge. 
- Rapportane gjev oss verdifull kunnskap.
In the evaluation, the external research environments looked at several aspects of e-voting. 
I evalueringa har dei eksterne forskingsmiljøa sett på fleire aspekt ved e-valet.
An overall final report from the evaluation will be presented at an open seminar at the House of Literature on 12 September. 
Ein samla sluttrapport frå evalueringa blir lagt fram på eit ope seminar på Litteraturhuset 12. september.
Voters in the pilot municipalities had a high level of confidence in both the conduction of the election in general and the actual e-voting pilot project. 
Veljarane i forsøkskommunane hadde høg tillit både til valgjennomføringa generelt og til sjølve e-valforsøket.
The fact that so many chose to vote electronically also shows that there was a high level of confidence in the pilot project. 
At så mange valde å røyste elektronisk, viser også at det var høg tillit til forsøket.
72.4 per cent of those who voted early in the pilot municipalities chose to vote via the Internet instead of by paper ballot. 
72,4 prosent av dei som førehandsrøysta i forsøkskommunane, valde å røyste via Internett i staden for på papir.
It was not possible to vote via the Internet on the actual day of the election. 
Det var ikkje mogleg å røyste via Internett på sjølve valdagen.
A major objective of the pilot project was to increase accessibility for all voters. 
Eit viktig mål for forsøket var å auke tilgjenge for alle veljarane.
95 per cent of those who voted via the Internet thought it was a simple and convenient way to vote. 
95 prosent av dei som røysta via Internett syntes dette var ein enkel og praktisk måte å røyste på.
The evaluation shows that people with disabilities want e-elections. 
Evalueringa viser at også personar med nedsett funksjonsevne ønskjer e-val.
Many of them could vote without assistance for the first time. 
Mange av desse kunne røyste utan hjelp for første gong.