natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I dare to say that this is because we take fisheries management seriously.
Jeg tror nok jeg tør si at det er fordi vi tar fiskeriforvaltning på alvor.
A good management system comprises an holistic approach of the ecosystems.
Et godt forvaltningssystem omfatter en helhetlig forvaltning av økosystemene.
This includes all living marine resources, and marine mammals also have a role to play here.
Det inkluderer alle de levende marine ressursene, og her spiller også sjøpattedyrene en rolle.
I am well aware that we have fundamentally different views on the harvesting of whales and seals.
Jeg er klar over at vi har grunnleggende ulike synspunkter på høstingen av hval og sel.
Nonetheless, I believe we have a responsibility as resource managers to discuss these issues on a factual and scientific basis, without being distracted by emotions.
Likevel mener jeg at vi har et ansvar som forvaltere for å diskutere disse spørsmålene på grunnlag av fakta og vitenskap, uten å bli avledet av emosjonelle strømninger.
The EU’s prohibition of trade in seal products is not something we can endorse.
EUs tiltak for å forby handel med selprodukter er ikke noe vi kan slutte oss til som et eksempel til etterfølgelse.
Our opposition to this measure is therefore firm – it is all about fundamental principles of ecosystem-based resource management.
Vår motstand mot dette tiltaket står derfor fast – dette har å gjøre med grunnleggende prinsipper for økosystembasert ressursforvaltning.
We will continue to harvest the sea’s resources as long as it is done scientifically and sustainably.
Vi vil fortsette å høste av havets ressurser så lenge dette er vitenskapelig basert og bærekraftig.
Let me return to the issue of taking fisheries management seriously.
Tilbake til det å ta fiskeriforvaltning på alvor.
We have been through a long and tough times, in which overcapacity and large-scale subsidies posed serious obstacles, undermining the fishing industry’s resource base.
Vi har vært gjennom lange og tunge tak der overkapasitet og sterk subsidiering har vært et alvorlig hinder som har undergravet fiskerinæringas ressursgrunnlag.
There were far too many boats fishing far too few fish.
Det har vært altfor mange båter som fisker på altfor lite fisk.
We therefore needed to implement measures to combat overcapacity and cater for a better management system.
Derfor måtte vi sette inn tiltak mot overkapasitets-problemet og legge til rette for et bedre forvaltningssystem.
Norway manages more than 80 per cent of the fish resources caught in our waters in together with other countries.
Norge forvalter over 80 prosent av fiskeressursene i våre farvann i samarbeid med andre land.
In the North, we cooperate with Russia and in the South with the EU.
I nord samarbeider vi med Russland og i sør samarbeider vi med EU.
Over the last 30 years, the Joint Norwegian-Russian Fisheries Commission has developed into a tightly knit partnership.
Den norsk-russiske fiskerikommisjonen har i løpet av de siste 30 år utviklet seg til et tett og sammensveiset partnerskap.
This has been built on mutual trust and a common understanding of key issues.
Det er bygget på gjensidig tillit og felles forståelse av viktige saker.
The stocks in the Barents Sea are showing a very positive trend.
Bestandene i Barentshavet er i en meget positiv utvikling.
The most recent quota recommendations from ICES, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, indicate in excess of more than 1 million tonnes of cod and haddock.
De siste kvoteanbefalingene fra Det internasjonale råd for havforskning (ICES) anbefaler en samlet torske- og hysekvote i Barentshavet på over 1 million tonn.
The cod stock in the Barents Sea is the largest in the world.
Torskebestanden i Barentshavet er verdens største.
This should indicate that we must have gotten something right in the North.
Dette betyr at vi må har gjort mye riktig i vår felles forvaltning i nord.
In terms of fisheries policy, Norway and the EU are bonded by destiny through our shared geography.
Fiskeripolitisk sett er Norge og EU bundet til hverandre i et geografisk skjebnefellesskap.
We manage common fish resources and need to agree on common management solutions.
Vi forvalter felles fiskebestander og må derfor bli enige om felles forvaltningsløsninger.
Norway relies upon the EU to manage its resources in a rational manner.
Norge er avhengig av at EU driver en fornuftig forvaltning av sine havområder.
And vice versa; the EU is dependent upon Norway to manage it’s fisheries resources soundly.
Og omvendt; EU er avhengig av at Norge har en god forvaltning.
In recent years, Norway and the EU have developed a very close cooperation , which I believe has been beneficial to both sides.
Norge og EU har de senere år utviklet et svært nært samarbeid, som jeg tror har vært nyttig for begge parter.
But I will not hide the fact that we faced difficulties last year .
Men jeg vil ikke legge skjul at det siste året har vært vanskelig.
The EU’s breach of the fisheries agreement last autumn put our cooperation to a hard test.
EUs brudd på fiskeriavtalen sist høst satte samarbeidet på hard prøve.
We need to perceive each other as partners, not as adversaries and to act accordingly.
Vi er nødt til å oppfatte hverandre som partnere, og ikke som motparter.
It is therefore highly important that the we continue our broadly based fisheries cooperation, and hopefully also extend it in the direction of a more harmonised regulatory framework.
Det er derfor svært viktig at EU og Norge viderefører vårt bredt anlagte fiskerisamarbeid, og forhåpentligvis også utvikler samarbeidet videre i retning av et mer harmonisert regelverk.
Fisheries management is real time management.
Fiskeriforvaltning er sanntidsforvaltning (real time management).
Norway and the EU must therefore choose administrative solutions that make it possible to deal rapidly with any situation that arises.
Norge og EU må derfor velge administrative løsninger som gjør det praktisk mulig å handle raskt på de utfordringer som måtte oppstå.
I cannot emphasise strongly enough the importance that Norway places on reducing discards.
Jeg kan ikke understreke sterkt nok hvor stor vekt Norge legger på å redusere utkast.
This weakens the scientific basis for stock assessment and hence the scientific advice for catch levels.
Dette svekker havforskernes grunnlag for bestandsevaluering og derved kvoterådgivning.
A fisheries policy which is based on the compulsory discarding of fish can never be sustainable.
En fiskeripolitikk som forutsetter og legger opp til utkast av fisk kan aldri bli bærekraftig.
We have agreed on measures to reduce the level of discards in the North Sea.
Vi har sammen blitt enige om tiltak for å redusere utkastnivået i Nordsjøen.
This is a step in the right direction, and I would like to urge you to go the full distance and introduce a full scale, explicit ban on discarding as soon as possible.
Dette er skritt i riktig retning, og jeg vil oppfordre dere til å ta steget fullt ut og innføre et rent forbud mot utkast så snart som mulig.
I have noted that the European Parliament has played an active role in the discussions on the reform of the common fisheries policy now underway.
Jeg har registrert at Europaparlamentet har tatt en aktiv rolle i diskusjonen av den igangsatte reformen av den felles fiskeripolitikken.
In this process, you have been asked to respond to a number of important and difficult questions.
I denne prosessen er dere bedt om å svare på en rekke viktige og vanskelige spørsmål.
Will a continuation of the current policy contribute to a reduction in overfishing, larger stocks and better profitability for the industry?
Vil en fortsettelse av dagens politikk bidra til redusert overfiske, større bestander og bedre lønnsomhet for næringa?
Will the Europeans of tomorrow accept that large scale public funds are being used to sustain an industry that, with the right framework conditions, could perfectly well stand on its own two feet?
Vil morgendagens borgere i Europa akseptere at offentlige midler brukes i stort omfang for å holde liv i ei næring, som med de riktige rammevilkårene utmerket godt kan stå på egne bein?
We know from experience that the future adaptation the European fishing industry needs to undergo will not be easy.
Vi vet av erfaring at slike nødvendige omstillinger som fiskerinæringa i Europa må gjennom ikke er enkle.
Good fisheries management is a long-term project and the benefits of a difficult reform may be unevenly distributed.
God fiskeriforvaltning er et langsiktig prosjekt, og gevinstene av en vanskelig reform kan være ujevnt fordelt.
The challenge is recognize that changes are necessary , and perseverance is crucial for a good outcome.
Utfordringen er å skape aksept for at endringer må til, og utholdenhet er avgjørende for hvor godt resultatet blir.
The main problem has been, and remains, overcapacity.
Hovedproblemet har vært, og er fremdeles overkapasitet.
Fish resources are renewable, but definitely not unlimited.
Fiskeressursene er fornybare, men definitivt ikke ubegrensede.
To ensure profitability and sustainability, there must be a good balance between what the sea can sustain and how many boats that harvest the resources.
For å sikre lønnsomhet og bærekraft må det være godt samsvar mellom hva havet gir og hvor mange som høster av ressursene.
There are many means to control overcapacity , and the industry can to this by itself, provided that the authorities lay the groundwork.
Det finnes mange alternativer for å få kontroll med overkapasitetsproblemet, og næringa kan selv være i stand til å ta denne oppgaven hvis myndighetene legger til rette.
The EU Green Book presented last year is comprehensive and deals with many of the key factors for modern fisheries management.
Grønnboka som ble lagt frem i fjor er omfattende og tar opp mange viktige elementer for en moderne fiskeriforvaltning.
I would be the first to emphasise that the framework conditions, traditions and challenges we face are different.
Jeg skal være den første til å understreke at rammebetingelsene, tradisjonene og utfordringene vi møter er forskjellige.
And it is by no means certain that the solutions we have chosen in Norway would fit the EU.
Og det er ikke sikkert at de løsningene vi har valgt i Norge, passer for EU.
However, we must solve the same fundamental problems.
Likevel mener jeg at vi grunnleggende sett må løse de samme problemene.
It is about long-term, sustainable management.
Det handler om langsiktig, bærekraftig forvaltning.
It is about reducing overcapacity which is stifling the opportunities for profitable fishing vessels.
Det handler om å redusere overkapasitet som sakte kveler grunnlaget for lønnsomme fiskefartøy.
And it’s about building an industry that can stand on its own two feet and to harvesting the resources of the community in a responsible and ethical manner.
Og det handler om å bygge en næring som står på egne ben og tar ansvar for å høste fellesskapets ressurser på en ansvarlig og etisk god måte.
I am quite sure that the reform will be a difficult exercise.
Jeg er sikker på at reformen vil bli en krevende øvelse.
But, with fish stocks being fished too hard and a fishing fleet in excess of what available resources can justify, are there really any alternatives?
Men, i en situasjon hvor bestandene beskattes for hardt, og hvor fiskeflåten er langt større enn ressursene gir grunnlag for, finnes det virkelig noen alternativer?
We have experienced some of the same processes of adaptation in the Norwegian fishing industry and we know that it is possible to succeed.
Vi har vært gjennom noen av de samme omstillingene i norsk fiskerinæring, og vi vet at det er mulig å lykkes.
I hope that some of the ideas and models which we have provided in our response to the Green Book may be useful as you proceed with the reform process.
Jeg håper derfor at noen av de tankene og modellene som vi diskuterer i vårt svar på Grønnboka, kan være til nytte for dere i den videre reformprosessen.
And I hope that you have the courage to set yourselves ambitious objectives that will help bring about real improvements.
Og jeg håper dere tør å sette dere høye og ambisiøse mål som bidrar til reelle forbedringer.
The European Parliament – and the Fisheries Committee in particular – plays an important role in the development of the fisheries policy of the EU.
Europaparlamentet - og Fiskerikomiteen i særdeleshet – spiller en viktig rolle i utviklingen av EUs fiskeripolitikk.
You are engaged and committed and wish to shape our common future.
Dere er interesserte og engasjerte og ønsker å forme vår felles framtid.
The European Parliament’s contribution to formulation of EU fisheries policy is therefore important to Norway.
Europaparlamentets bidrag på det fiskeripolitiske området er derfor viktig for Norge.
For this very reason it is my wish that we engage in strengthened dialogue.
Ikke minst derfor er det mitt ønske at vi skal gå inn i en styrket dialog.
The Parliament’s Fisheries Committee visited Norway in 2008.
Fiskerikomiteen i Parlamentet var på besøk til Norge i 2008.
From what I have heard, that visit was both interesting and highly useful.
Etter det jeg har hørt var dette besøket både interessant og svært nyttig.
I believe that time is ripe to once again invite you up North.
Jeg mener nå det er tid for å invitere dere nordover igjen.
Let us try to find a suitable time during 2011 .
Jeg ser for meg en passende tid i løpet av 2011 som et godt tidspunkt for et besøk.
I can assure you that we will come up with a programme to both inspire and perhaps also challenge you.
Jeg kan forsikre dere om at vi skal lage et program som både vil inspirere og kanskje også utfordre.
Even though we are on good terms with Mother Nature, and try to provide for good weather and a nice midnight sun, it might be useful to bring a raincoat and wellington boots.
Og selv om vi har god kontakt med ”moder jord” og vil bestille deilig vær og midnattssol, kan det nok hende det er lurt å ta med regnfrakk og støvler.
The Norwegian Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs meets the Fisheries Committee of the European Parliament
Fiskeri- og kystministeren møtte fiskerikomiteen i Europaparlamentet
The Abel Prize awarded Thompson and Tits
Abelprisen tildelt Thompson og Tits
The ceremony took place in the University of Oslo Aula.
Seremonien fant sted i Universitetets Aula i Oslo.
Read more about the prize and the ceremony at http://www.abelprisen.no/en/
Les mer om tildelingen på nettsidene for Abelprisen
Thompson and Tits share the Abel Prize for 2008
Abelprisen 2008 til John Griggs Thompson og Jaques Tits
The bill regarding Cermaq is approved
Proposisjonen om Cermaq er vedtatt
This is confirmed after the Parliament late Thursday 20 June approved the bill regarding State Ownership in Cermaq ASA (Prop.
Det er klart etter at Stortinget sent torsdag den 20. juni vedtok proposisjon om statens eierskap i Cermaq (Prop.
178 S (2012-2013)).
178 S (2012-2013)).
Handelsbanken is currently conducting a ”reverse Dutch auction” on behalf of the Ministry, related to the State’s possible purchase of Cermaq shares.
Handelsbanken gjennomfører på vegne av Staten en såkalt ”reverse Dutch auction” knyttet til mulig kjøp av Cermaq-aksjer fra statens side.
The auction is open until Monday 24 June at 4:30 p.m.
Auksjonen er åpen til og med mandag 24. juni kl 1630.
Speech during the Clean Energy Ministerial
Tale under Clean Energy Ministerial
Washington, 19.- 20.7.2010
Washington, 19.- 20.7.2010
The speech was based on the following:
Talen var basert på følgende manus:
First of all, I would like to commend the United States and Secretary Chu for their efforts.
First of all, I would like to commend the United States and Secretary Chu for their efforts.
In my opinion, the Clean Energy Ministerial is a very timely event and I am thankful for the invitation to Norway to participate in this process.
In my opinion, the Clean Energy Ministerial is a very timely event and I am thankful for the invitation to Norway to participate in this process.
The energy sector is responsible for 65 per cent of the world’s greenhouse-gas emissions.
The energy sector is responsible for 65 per cent of the world’s greenhouse-gas emissions.
This ministerial provides us with an opportunity to share ideas and experiences that will guide us in our work to minimise these emissions.
This ministerial provides us with an opportunity to share ideas and experiences that will guide us in our work to minimise these emissions.
Every country has their set of advantages and challenges defining the ground conditions as to how energy policy can be shaped in that country.
Every country has their set of advantages and challenges defining the ground conditions as to how energy policy can be shaped in that country.
But, I want to make three points which I think are common to us all:
But, I want to make three points which I think are common to us all:
We ought to pay the real cost of energy; this entails a much higher price of energy than most pay today
We ought to pay the real cost of energy; this entails a much higher price of energy than most pay today
Governments must be willing to take an active part in funding new and innovative technologies
Governments must be willing to take an active part in funding new and innovative technologies
We must put in place frameworks and regulations which promote the diffusion of clean energy solutions
We must put in place frameworks and regulations which promote the diffusion of clean energy solutions
First, in order to pay the real price of energy, the threats and effects of climate change must be incorporated.
First, in order to pay the real price of energy, the threats and effects of climate change must be incorporated.
A price on emissions equals a more genuine cost of energy
A price on emissions equals a more genuine cost of energy
This will stimulate industry and individuals to save energy and invest in clean energy technologies and push the world towards a more sustainable path.
This will stimulate industry and individuals to save energy and invest in clean energy technologies and push the world towards a more sustainable path.
In Norway, we introduced a CO2-tax in 1991.
In Norway, we introduced a CO2-tax in 1991.
This led, amongst others, to our first CCS-project in 1996.
This led, amongst others, to our first CCS-project in 1996.
Today, about 70 percent of our greenhouse gas emissions are subject to a tax or covered by the European emission trading scheme.
Today, about 70 percent of our greenhouse gas emissions are subject to a tax or covered by the European emission trading scheme.
Second, as the IEA reports we have received for this ministerial have stated, as well as numerous other studies: new clean energy technologies need to be developed and commercialised.
Second, as the IEA reports we have received for this ministerial have stated, as well as numerous other studies: new clean energy technologies need to be developed and commercialised.
More public funds should be allocated to technology development.
More public funds should be allocated to technology development.
We have a responsibility to support and accelerate this development.
We have a responsibility to support and accelerate this development.
In my experience, government support works best if we work together with industry and other stakeholders.
In my experience, government support works best if we work together with industry and other stakeholders.
That is why our support schemes for research, development and demonstration only offer funding on the condition that private stakeholders contribute both financially and with technical expertise.
That is why our support schemes for research, development and demonstration only offer funding on the condition that private stakeholders contribute both financially and with technical expertise.
An example from Norway is the Government partnering up with Statoil, Shell and Sasol to create a CO2 technology centre.
An example from Norway is the Government partnering up with Statoil, Shell and Sasol to create a CO2 technology centre.
At this technology centre, which is almost halfway in its construction, we will capture CO2 from two different emission sources and two capture technologies.
At this technology centre, which is almost halfway in its construction, we will capture CO2 from two different emission sources and two capture technologies.
This is just one example.
This is just one example.
Public R&D funding in Norway has been strengthened considerably, having been tripled from 2007 to 2010.
Public R&D funding in Norway has been strengthened considerably, having been tripled from 2007 to 2010.
We are investing in technologies across the board, from renewable energy production to energy efficiency.
We are investing in technologies across the board, from renewable energy production to energy efficiency.
Third, we need to create legal frameworks which help remove potential barriers and enable a more rapid deployment of clean energy solutions.
Third, we need to create legal frameworks which help remove potential barriers and enable a more rapid deployment of clean energy solutions.
I ask myself if this is not a tool we can utilise to a greater extent than we are currently doing.
I ask myself if this is not a tool we can utilise to a greater extent than we are currently doing.
I have already mentioned the CO2-tax and the emissions trading system as an illustration of tax-based legislation.
I have already mentioned the CO2-tax and the emissions trading system as an illustration of tax-based legislation.
But let me mention another example: Oil-fired boilers account for a significant share of Norwegian CO2-emissions.
But let me mention another example: Oil-fired boilers account for a significant share of Norwegian CO2-emissions.
We have now banned the use of oil-fired boilers in new buildings, and we are planning to introduce legislation ensuring that existing installations be phased out.
We have now banned the use of oil-fired boilers in new buildings, and we are planning to introduce legislation ensuring that existing installations be phased out.
This will ensure a faster transition to cleaner sources of heating.
This will ensure a faster transition to cleaner sources of heating.
The Clean Energy Ministerial is the ideal setting for how we should go forward; I have mentioned some examples of the tools we have in the governmental toolbox.
The Clean Energy Ministerial is the ideal setting for how we should go forward; I have mentioned some examples of the tools we have in the governmental toolbox.
The initiatives to be announced tomorrow aim to put all these to use.
The initiatives to be announced tomorrow aim to put all these to use.
And that is an important reason why Norway supports this work.
And that is an important reason why Norway supports this work.
The Brazilian market Seen from a Norwegian Perspective
The Brazilian market Seen from a Norwegian Perspective
Breakfast Network Meeting, Rio de Janeiro
Breakfast Network Meeting, Rio de Janeiro
Brazil is truly one of the world’s leading petroleum provinces and Rio Oil and Gas is an outstanding meeting place for the petroleum industry.
Brazil is truly one of the world’s leading petroleum provinces and Rio Oil and Gas is an outstanding meeting place for the petroleum industry.
Today’s network meeting is about how to do business in Brazil.
Today’s network meeting is about how to do business in Brazil.
I would like to take this opportunity to say a few words about how we perceive Brazil from a Norwegian perspective.
I would like to take this opportunity to say a few words about how we perceive Brazil from a Norwegian perspective.
I will also highlight some of the characteristics that Norway and Brazil have in common.
I will also highlight some of the characteristics that Norway and Brazil have in common.
Though we are separated by the Atlantic, there are many ties that keep us linked together.
Though we are separated by the Atlantic, there are many ties that keep us linked together.
Like Norway, the oil and gas industry is the backbone of Brazil’s economy.
Like Norway, the oil and gas industry is the backbone of Brazil’s economy.
With regard to promising discoveries and investment plans Brazil stands out.
With regard to promising discoveries and investment plans Brazil stands out.