natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Who am I, what is my identity, and what can I do to widen my options and choices in life?
Who am I, what is my identity, and what can I do to widen my options and choices in life?
And what other people have the power to take decisions about my life, and by what right do these people, belonging to past and present generations, have that power?
And what other people have the power to take decisions about my life, and by what right do these people, belonging to past and present generations, have that power?
It is for this Commission to widen people’s personal freedom and to decide on frameworks that will enable people, not least young people, to make informed choices
It is for this Commission to widen people’s personal freedom and to decide on frameworks that will enable people, not least young people, to make informed choices
about their good health and well-being
about their good health and well-being
about when to have children
about when to have children
and the spacing of those children
and the spacing of those children
18 years after the adoption of the Cairo Programme of Action, the world is witnessing the largest generation ever entering sexual and reproductive life.
18 years after the adoption of the Cairo Programme of Action, the world is witnessing the largest generation ever entering sexual and reproductive life.
They aspire for education.
They aspire for education.
Then they aspire for working opportunities, and for possibilities to have influence on society.
Then they aspire for working opportunities, and for possibilities to have influence on society.
Since Cairo we have gained impressive new knowledge about what needs to be done to enable the young to take charge of their own destiny, which includes dealing with existential questions: We have it in our power to promote and protect their human rights.
Since Cairo we have gained impressive new knowledge about what needs to be done to enable the young to take charge of their own destiny, which includes dealing with existential questions: We have it in our power to promote and protect their human rights.
In our view, but I regret to say, not in the view of all of us this includes their sexual and reproductive rights.
In our view, but I regret to say, not in the view of all of us this includes their sexual and reproductive rights.
We know that comprehensive sexuality education helps young people to cope with their identity, their sexuality and their fundamental decisions in life.
We know that comprehensive sexuality education helps young people to cope with their identity, their sexuality and their fundamental decisions in life.
In fact, girls and boys who receive comprehensive sexuality education are more likely to postpone sexual debut and protect themselves from abuse, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections.
In fact, girls and boys who receive comprehensive sexuality education are more likely to postpone sexual debut and protect themselves from abuse, unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections.
In essence, this education gives them knowledge and skills that enables them to protect themselves.
In essence, this education gives them knowledge and skills that enables them to protect themselves.
Comprehensive sexuality education is not about encouraging children to experiment with their sexuality or indoctrinating them into non heterosexual lifestyles as some, regretfully, are falsely claiming.
Comprehensive sexuality education is not about encouraging children to experiment with their sexuality or indoctrinating them into non heterosexual lifestyles as some, regretfully, are falsely claiming.
Second, A particular focus on girls and young women is required because of their vulnerabilities and specific needs.
Second, A particular focus on girls and young women is required because of their vulnerabilities and specific needs.
Early and forced marriages and early pregnancies can be a health risk and also deprive young girls of the opportunity to get educated, make a living, being a voice in society.
Early and forced marriages and early pregnancies can be a health risk and also deprive young girls of the opportunity to get educated, make a living, being a voice in society.
We need to change this and allow them to reach their full potential – to make choices about their own lives, free of coercion, discrimination and any kind of violence.
We need to change this and allow them to reach their full potential – to make choices about their own lives, free of coercion, discrimination and any kind of violence.
Third, We know that in countries where abortion is illegal, both the number of abortions and the number of women dying from abortions increase.
Third, We know that in countries where abortion is illegal, both the number of abortions and the number of women dying from abortions increase.
Thus it is false, as some claim, that those of us who promote and protect the human right of women to choose abortion as a way of dealing with unwanted pregnancies also promote abortion.
Thus it is false, as some claim, that those of us who promote and protect the human right of women to choose abortion as a way of dealing with unwanted pregnancies also promote abortion.
I do not know of any country or government that favours abortions as such.
I do not know of any country or government that favours abortions as such.
The issue is now and in the future: Who should make the ultimate decision.
The issue is now and in the future: Who should make the ultimate decision.
The women?
The women?
Or the custodians of old cultural or religious rules?Empirical evidence shows that those who oppose legal abortion actually contribute to promoting the use of abortion, of unsafe abortions and unnecessary deaths.
Or the custodians of old cultural or religious rules?Empirical evidence shows that those who oppose legal abortion actually contribute to promoting the use of abortion, of unsafe abortions and unnecessary deaths.
And this leads me to my last point with regards to human rights:
And this leads me to my last point with regards to human rights:
We know that all around the world - in all countries and in all cultures, subscribing to all religions – millions of people have sexual orientations that differ from the majority.
We know that all around the world - in all countries and in all cultures, subscribing to all religions – millions of people have sexual orientations that differ from the majority.
We know as well that millions of gays, lesbians and transgender persons, in all regions of the world, are being exposed to violence and harassment because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.
We know as well that millions of gays, lesbians and transgender persons, in all regions of the world, are being exposed to violence and harassment because of their sexual orientation and gender identity.
This is a grave violation of their human rights, and this Commission must speak loudly to help bring this discrimination to an end!
This is a grave violation of their human rights, and this Commission must speak loudly to help bring this discrimination to an end!
This has been a statement on the human rights of young people.
This has been a statement on the human rights of young people.
Before I close, let me make a final point on the relationship between human rights and development: We know that promotion and protection of human rights is not a product of – but a significant contributor to development.
Before I close, let me make a final point on the relationship between human rights and development: We know that promotion and protection of human rights is not a product of – but a significant contributor to development.
And that those countries that fail to recognize this pay the price themselves.
And that those countries that fail to recognize this pay the price themselves.
Thus it is false, as many claim, that respect for everyone’s human rights must wait until a country reaches a certain level of development.
Thus it is false, as many claim, that respect for everyone’s human rights must wait until a country reaches a certain level of development.
On the contrary; a rights-based approach to development is the only decent and effective way to go.
On the contrary; a rights-based approach to development is the only decent and effective way to go.
We hope this will inspire all colleagues, to help us agree to an outcome document based on evidence and human rights!
We hope this will inspire all colleagues, to help us agree to an outcome document based on evidence and human rights!
International Conference on Right-wing Extremism and Hate Crime in Europe and Beyond
Internasjonal konferanse om høyreekstremisme og hatkriminalitet i og utenfor Europa
Key findings and recommendations will be summarized in a final report.
Viktige funn og anbefalinger skal samles i en sluttrapport.
The Conference is organized by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and sponsored by the EEA and Norway Grants.
Konferansen arrangeres av Utenriksdepartementet og finansieres av EØS-midlene.
The plenary sessions of the Conference will be streamed live (see link below).
Plenumsmøtene på konferansen overføres direkte i nett-TV.
Conference programme
Konferanseprogram
Rigmor Aasrud appointed Minister of Reform and Church Affairs
Rigmor Aasrud utnevnt til fornyings- og kirkeminister
Until 20 December 2009 she also has the political responsibility for the Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion, with the exception of the department of immigration and the department of integration and cultural diversity.
Fram til og med 20. desember 2009 har hun også ansvar for Arbeids- og inkluderingsdepartementet, med unntak av innvandringsavdelingen og integrerings- og mangfoldsavdelingen.
Rigmor Aasrud has a long political career in the Labour Party.
Rigmor Aasrud har lang politisk fartstid i Arbeiderpartiet.
In 2009 she was elected Member of Parliament for the county of Oppland.
I 2009 ble hun valgt inn på Stortinget for Oppland.
The last four years she has served as state secretary in the Ministry of Health and Care Services.
De siste fire årene har hun vært statssekretær i Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet (HOD).
In the period 1992 till 1996 she was secretary for women’s issues in the Labour Party.
I perioden 1992 til 1996 var hun kvinnepolitisk sekretær i Arbeiderpartiet.
Ms Aasrud also has a long experience in local politics.
Aasrud har også lang lokalpolitisk erfaring.
In 1983 she was elected member of the Gran municipal council.
I 1983 ble hun valgt inn i Gran kommunestyre.
For ten years, from 1995 till 2005, she was mayor.
I 10 år, fra 1995 til 2005, var hun ordfører i kommunen.
In addition, she was leader of the municipality’s administrative council in the period 1987-1991.
Hun har også vært leder av administrasjonsutvalget i perioden 1987 til 1991.
Rigmor Aasrud has a business graduate degree from Norwegian School of Management BI.
Rigmor Aasrud er utdannet bedriftsøkonom fra Handelshøyskolen BI.
She also has a degree in information counseling at the College of Lillehammer.
Hun har også grunnfag i informasjonsrådgivning fra Høyskolen på Lillehammer.
Minister of Reform and Church Affairs Ms Rigmor Aasrud at the Palace Square.
Fornyings- og kirkeminister Rigmor Aasrud på Slottsplassen.
Photo: AID
Foto: AID
Agreement reached in Rio+20 negotiations
Enighet i Rio-forhandlingene
These goals will give both rich and poor countries something to strive for.
Det vil gi både rike og fattige land noe å strekke seg etter.
“The new sustainable development goals should mobilise concerted effort in this area.
– De nye målene skal mobilisere til en felles innsats for bærekraftig utvikling.
I believe that they will be even more important than the Millennium Development Goals,” said Minister of International Development Heikki Holmås.
Jeg tror de vil bli enda viktigere enn FNs tusenårsmål har vært, sier utviklingsminister Heikki Holmås.
Mr Holmås has headed the Norwegian delegation during the final phase of the preparatory process.
Holmås har ledet den norske delegasjonen i sluttfasen av de innledende rundene.
“The draft outcome document emphasises the need for sustainable energy for all, and stresses the importance of renewable energy and of improving energy efficiency.
- Forslaget til slutterklæring legger vekt på behovet for energi for alle, fornybar energi og energieffektivisering.
In this area, Norway has made its mark through our Energy+ initiative and concrete projects that will provide more green energy for poor countries.
Her har Norge markert seg med konkrete tiltak som skal gi mer grønn strøm til fattige land, gjennom vårt energi- og klimainitiativ.
We are also supporting UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s Sustainable Energy for All initiative,” Mr Holmås said.
Vi støtter opp om FN-sjef Ban Ki-moons initiativ om bærekraftig energi til alle, sier Holmås.
Nevertheless, there is agreement that the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) should be strengthened.
Det er likevel enighet om at FNs miljøprogram (Unep) må styrkes.
“We are pleased that equitable economic growth is a recurrent theme throughout the outcome document.
- Vi er fornøyd med at rettferdig fordeling går som en rød tråd gjennom dokumentet.
Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and other heads of state and government will arrive in Rio de Janeiro today to complete this work and adopt the outcome document.
I dag kommer statsminister Jens Stoltenberg og andre statsledere til Rio de Janeiro for å sluttføre arbeidet og vedta erklæringen.
Read the whole draft outcome document, The Future We Want, here (.pdf).
Les hele erklæringen «The Future We Want» her (.pdf).
Press contact: Press Duty Officer, international development, mobile phone: + 47 913 95 000.
Pressekontakt: Pressevakten for utviklingssaker, telefon 913 95 000.
Address in Ris Church in Oslo in connection with the World Council of Churches’ week of action for peace in Israel and Palestine and prayer for peace
Ord i Ris kirke i Oslo, i anledning Kirkenes Verdensråds internasjonale uke for fred i Israel og Palestina og bønn om fred
- You don’t talk about faith in order to agree, or to convince each other that “My God is better than yours.”
- Man diskuterer ikke tro for å bli enige, eller for å overbevise hverandre om at ”min Gud er bedre enn din”.
Heads of churches in Jerusalem are not meeting to persuade each other.
Trosledere i Jerusalem kommer ikke sammen for å overtale hverandre.
They are seeking to build something greater.
De vil bygge noe større.
Check against delivery Translation from Norwegian
Sjekkes mot fremføring
Dear friends,
Kjære alle sammen,
I would like to thank the World Council of Churches, and all the churches – including my own, Ris Church – for opening their doors this week for peace in Palestine and Israel.
Jeg vil takke Kirkenes Verdensråd – og alle kirkene – også min egen, Ris kirke, som denne uken åpner sine dører for fred i Palestina og Israel.
We who are at this service today, 8 June, are part of a great community, made up of people all over the world.
I dag, på den 8. juni, er vi en del av et stort fellesskap med mennesker over en hel verden.
We have listened to the insightful message of the Palestinian Bishop Munib Younan.
Vi har lyttet til klokskapen fra den palestinske biskop Munib Younan.
We have seen in him great courage and wisdom.
Vi har sett i denne mannen mot og klokskap.
And we have reflected on a message of peace from 13 heads of churches in Jerusalem.
Vi har tenkt gjennom et fredsbudskap fra 13 kirkeledere i Jerusalem.
We are left with a deep sense that peace in the Middle East must be possible.
Og igjen sitter vi med den dype opplevelsen: At fred i Midtøsten må være mulig.
There are many conflicts in the world that are claiming lives and violating human dignity.
Verden har mange konflikter som tar liv og krenker menneskeverdet.
Yes, there are many conflicts in the world.
Ja, verden har mange konflikter.
Difficult even for those who believe.
Vanskelig selv for dem som tror.
I don’t see the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in this light.
Jeg greier ikke å se konflikten mellom Israel og palestinere i det lyset.
It is a conflict where the solution seems obvious: a settlement with two states – Israel and Palestine – living side by side in peace within internationally recognised borders.
Det er en konflikt der resultatet synes så tydelig; en fredsløsning med to stater – Israel og Palestina – som kan leve side om side i fred, innenfor internasjonalt anerkjente grenser.
A settlement that requires concerted efforts on certain difficult issues, such as the status of Jerusalem and the return of refugees.
En avklaring som krever noen tunge tak på områder, som Jerusalems status og retur av flyktninger.
Difficult – but not impossible.
Krevende – men ikke umulig.
I have on a few occasions made two- to three-day roundtrips of the Middle East from Damascus via Beirut to Jerusalem, Gaza and Ramallah.
De har hendt at jeg på to-tre dager har gjort rundturen i Midtøsten fra Damaskus via Beirut til Jerusalem, til Gaza og Ramallah.
These trips have strengthened my hope for peace.
En slik tur styrker dette inntrykket.
Peace is possible.
Fred er mulig.
Ultimately, what the parties want for their communities is not so different.
De snakker dypest sett ikke så forskjellig om hva de vil for sine samfunn.
The answers given to this question can help to build bridges.
Svarene inviterer til å bygge broer.
They can provide negotiators with the material they need to develop solutions.
Svarene gir forhandlere innhold å jobbe med når de skal snekre løsninger.
In this respect, the leaders in the Middle East need to be challenged and held accountable.
Her må Midtøstens ledere utfordres og holdes ansvarlige:
We need more action.
Vi trenger mer handling.
There must be no more settlements in occupied territory.
At det ikke kommer flere bosettinger.
The occupation must end.
At okkupasjonen må opphøre.
A spirit of peace must prevail.
At det handles i en fredsløsnings ånd.
Yes peace must come from the top.
Ja, fred må komme ”fra toppen”.
For, as Bishop Younan reminded us, peace is all about justice.
For som biskop Younan minner oss om: Fred handler om rettferdighet.
And in the fight for justice the voice of the people must be heard.
Og i kampen for rettferdighet, må folkets stemme høres.
The World Council of Churches is taking important initiatives.
Kirkenes Verdensråd tar viktige initiativ.
Interdenominational dialogue between church leaders in Jerusalem – with active Norwegian support – is showing an alternative way forward, preparing the ground for something other than conflict.
Interreligiøs dialog blant kirkeledere i Jerusalem – med aktiv norsk støtte – viser en annen vei, bereder grunnen for noe annet enn konflikt.
As everyone knows, you don’t talk about faith in order to agree, or to convince each other that “My God is better than yours.”
Alle vet dette: Man diskuterer ikke tro for å bli enige, eller for å overbevise hverandre om at ”min Gud er bedre enn din”.
We are talking together on the basis of our faith to broaden our minds, become wiser and more secure in our standpoints.
Vi snakker med utgangspunkt i tro, for å bli klokere og videre, og tryggere i våre utsyn.
In short – to lay the foundation for peace.
I sum: For å legge grunnlag for fred.
This is the message today from churches all over the country, and from all over the world.
Det er budskapet fra kirker over hele landet i dag og fra kirker over hele verden.
Lay the foundation for peace.
Å legge grunnlag for fred.
It is important.
Det er viktig.
It is vital.
Det er vesentlig.
And it is urgent.
Og det haster.
Risk of corruption in Norway to be explored
Vil undersøke korrupsjonsrisiko i Norge
The purpose of the study is to promote consciousness on corruption risk, vulnerability and risk handling in important social institutions.
Formålet med undersøkelsen er å fremme bevissthet om korrupsjonsrisiko, sårbarhet og håndtering av risiko i viktige samfunnsinstitusjoner.
The study National Integrity System is part of a greater comparative study of risk of corruption in Europe.
Undersøkelsen National Integrity System er en del av en større sammenliknende studie av korrupsjonsrisiko i Europa.
The Norwegian part of the study is carried out by NIBR, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
Den norske delen av undersøkelsen gjennomføres av Norsk institutt for by- og regionforskning.
Responsible for the study is the Norwegian branch of Transparency International.
Ansvarlig for studien er den norske avdelingen av Transparency International.
The report will be finished in 2012.
Rapporten ferdigstilles i 2012.
Risk weights under the IRB approach
IRB-bankenes beregningsgrunnlag for kapitalkrav
In order to strengthen the banks internal models to promote financial stability, the minimum requirement for banks' estimates of the parameter Loss Given Default (LGD) is increased from 10 pct. to 20 pct. for mortgage loan exposures.
For å styrke bankenes modeller ut fra hensynet til finansiell stabilitet økes minstekravet til modellparameteren “tap gitt mislighold” (LGD) fra 10 prosent til 20 prosent i kapitalkravforskriften.
In accordance with new EU legislation, this minimum requirement will apply for branches of foreign banks operating in Norway.
Etter EUs nye regelverk vil minstekrav til LGD også gjelde for filialer.
Existing rules regarding the so-called Basel I floor is continued as present.
Gjeldende regler om det såkalte Basel I-gulvet videreføres slik de er i dag.
–In the Revised National Budget 2013 I informed that the Ministry would return to the question on the calculation of risk weights under the IRB approach this autumn.
– I Revidert nasjonalbudsjett 2013 opplyste jeg at departementet høsten 2013 ville komme tilbake til spørsmålet om beregningen av risikovekter for banker som bruker interne modeller.
Internationally, much attention is paid to the use of internal models for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, and especially risk-weights of residential mortgage loans and corporate loans.
Det er mye oppmerksomhet internasjonalt rundt bankenes modeller for beregning av kapitalkrav, og særlig om vekter for bolig- og næringslån.
Significant shortcomings have been uncovered in these models, and this may call for revisions and closer monitoring of banks' use of models.
Det er internasjonalt avdekket vesentlige svakheter i modellene, og dette kan tilsi revisjoner og nye krav til myndighetenes oppfølging av modellbruken.
In my opinion it is important that the sum of risk-weighted assets is not weakened for banks using the IRB approach.
Jeg mener det er viktig at beregningsgrunnlaget ikke svekkes for bankene som bruker egne modeller.
In Norway, the Basel I floor rule is a backstop for IRB banks' risk-weighted assets, whereby risk-weighted assets cannot be lower than 80 pct. of banks' risk-weighted assets calculated according to the Basel I rules.
Basel I-gulvet hindrer at bankene gjennom bruk av egne modeller anvender et beregningsgrunnlag for kapitalkrav som er lavere enn 80 prosent av beregningsgrunnlaget beregnet etter de tidligere Basel I-reglene.
In Norway, this will be fulfilled by a continuance of the current Norwegian Basel I floor rule.
Dette oppfylles i Norge ved videreføring av gjeldende regler om Basel I-gulvet.
Risk weights on loan exposures depend, among other variables, on the estimates of Probability of Default (PD) and the aforementioned LGD.
Risikovektene for et lån avhenger av produktet av “sannsynlighet for mislighold (PD)” og “tap gitt mislighold (LGD)”.
Such a measure will therefore apply for branches of foreign banks as well as for domestic banks.
Dette kravet vil også gjelde for filialer.
In order to strengthen banks' internal models to promote financial stability, the LGD minimum requirement in Norway is increased from 10 pct. to 20 pct. for mortgage loan exposures.
For å styrke bankenes modeller ut fra hensynet til finansiell stabilitet økes LGD-gulvet fra 10 prosent til 20 prosent for lån med pant i bolig.
The amendment enters into force on 1 January 2014.
Endringen trer i kraft fra 1. januar 2014.