natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The result of the safety assessment is to be signed stating the date of preparation or be issued based on an electronic release establishing a clear relationship between the assessor, the formulation and the date of assessment.
Resultatet av sikkerhetsvurderingen skal underskrives med angivelse av datoen den ble utarbeidet, eller utgis i elektronisk form, der det fastslås en klar forbindelse mellom den sakkyndige, sammensetningen og vurderingens dato.
The electronic version should be protected from abuse by unauthorised persons.
Den elektroniske versjonen skal være beskyttet mot misbruk av uvedkommende personer.
In accordance with Article 10(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, the safety assessor is required to be ‘a person in possession of a diploma or other evidence of formal qualifications awarded on completion of a university course of theoretical and practical study in pharmacy, toxicology, medicine or a similar discipline or a course recognised as equivalent by a Member State’.
I samsvar med artikkel 10 nr. 2 i forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 skal den sikkerhetssakkyndige være «en person som innehar et diplom eller annet bevis på formell kvalifikasjon tildelt etter endt universitetsutdanning med teoretiske og praktiske studier i farmasi, toksikologi, medisin eller lignende fag, eller en utdanning som er anerkjent som likeverdig av en medlemsstat».
A person who has obtained qualifications in a third country may act as a safety assessor if they have completed ‘a course recognised as equivalent [to a university course of theoretical and practical study in pharmacy, toxicology, medicine or a similar discipline] by a Member State’.
Personer som har oppnådd sine kvalifikasjoner i en tredjestat, kan fungere som sikkerhetssakkyndige, dersom de har fullført «en utdanning som er anerkjent som likeverdig [med universitetsutdanning med teoretiske og praktiske studier i farmasi, toksikologi, medisin eller lignende fag] av en medlemsstat».
Proof is to be provided of the safety assessor’s qualification (i.e. copy of the diploma and, where needed, proof of equivalence) laid down in Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009.
Den sikkerhetssakkyndiges kvalifikasjoner skal dokumenteres (dvs. kopi av diplom, og dersom det er nødvendig, bevis for likeverdighet) fastsatt i artikkel 10 i forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009.
References
Henvisninger:
ATSDR (2004).
ATSDR (2004).
Guidance Manual for the assessment of joint toxic action of chemical mixtures.
Guidance Manual for the assessment of joint toxic action of chemical mixtures.
Atlanta, GA:
Atlanta, GA:
ATSDR, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
ATSDR, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
EFSA (2008) EFSA-Q-2006-160.
EFSA (2008) EFSA-Q-2006-160.
Bremmer H.J., Prud’homme de Lodder L.C.H., van Engelen J.G.M., Cosmetics Fact Sheet to Assess the Risks for the Consumer, Updated version for ConsExpo 4, RIVM report 320104001/2006 (http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320104001.pdf).
Bremmer H.J., Prud’homme de Lodder L.C.H., van Engelen J.G.M., Cosmetics Fact Sheet to Assess the Risks for the Consumer, Updated version for ConsExpo 4, RIVM report 320104001/2006 (http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320104001.pdf).
COSMED, Comment constituer le rapport de sécurité?
COSMED, Comment constituer le rapport de sécurité?
(Règlement (CE) No 1223/2009), Collection:
(Règlement (CE) No 1223/2009), Collection:
Les guides pratiques des entreprises — Editions 2011-2012.,
Les guides pratiques des entreprises — Editions 2011-2012.,
CTFA & COLIPA, Guidelines On Stability Testing Of Cosmetic Products, March 2004.
CTFA & COLIPA, Guidelines On Stability Testing Of Cosmetic Products, March 2004.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance for identification and naming of substances under REACH and CLP, November 2011.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance for identification and naming of substances under REACH and CLP, November 2011.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.4:
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.4:
Evaluation of available information, December 2011.
Evaluation of available information, December 2011.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment — Chapter R.7a:
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment — Chapter R.7a:
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment — Chapter R.7c:
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment — Chapter R.7c:
ECHA, Practical guide 2:
ECHA, Practical guide 2:
How to report weight of evidence’, 2010, http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13655/pg_report_weight_of_evidence_en.pdf
How to report weight of evidence’, 2010, http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13655/pg_report_weight_of_evidence_en.pdf
European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the animal testing and marketing ban and on the state of play in relation to alternative methods in the field of cosmetics, COM(2013) 135 final.
Europakommisjonen, Melding fra Kommisjonen til europaparlamentet og rådet om forbud mot dyreforsøk og markedsføring, og om situasjonen med hensyn til alternative metoder på kosmetikksektoren, COM(2013) 135 endelig.
European Commission, Composition and undesirable effects of cosmetic products to be made easily accessible to the public — practical implementation of Article 7a(1)(h), second subparagraph, of Directive 76/768/EEC (http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/files/doc/guide_access_info_en.pdf).
European Commission, Composition and undesirable effects of cosmetic products to be made easily accessible to the public — practical implementation of Article 7a(1)(h), second subparagraph, of Directive 76/768/EEC (http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/files/doc/guide_access_info_en.pdf).
Greim H. and Snyder R. (eds), Toxicology and Risk Assessment — A comprehensive Introduction.
Greim H. and Snyder R. (eds), Toxicology and Risk Assessment — A comprehensive Introduction.
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008.
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2008.
Hall B., Tozer S., Safford B., Coroama M., Steiling W., Leneveu-Duchemin M.C., McNamara C. and Gibney M., European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Volume 45, Issue 11, November 2007, Pages 2097-2108.
Hall B., Tozer S., Safford B., Coroama M., Steiling W., Leneveu-Duchemin M.C., McNamara C. and Gibney M., European consumer exposure to cosmetic products, a framework for conducting population exposure assessments, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Volume 45, Issue 11, November 2007, side 2097-2108.
IGHRC 2006, Guidelines on route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data when assessing health risks of chemicals.
IGHRC 2006, Guidelines on route-to-route extrapolation of toxicity data when assessing health risks of chemicals.
Klimisch HJ, Andreae E and Tillmann U, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
Klimisch HJ, Andreae E and Tillmann U, A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental and ecotoxicological data.
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 25 (1997), p. 1-5.
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 25 (1997), s. 1-5.
Kroes R., Renwick A. G., Feron V., Galli C. L., Gibney M., Greim H., Guy R. H., Lhuguenot J. C., van de Sandt J. J. M., Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, Food and Chemical Toxicology 45 (2007), 2533–2562.
Kroes R., Renwick A. G., Feron V., Galli C. L., Gibney M., Greim H., Guy R. H., Lhuguenot J. C., van de Sandt J. J. M., Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients, Food and Chemical Toxicology 45 (2007), 2533–2562.
Loretz L.J., Api A.M., Babcock L., Barraj L.M., Burdick J., Cater K.C., Jarrett G., Mann S., Pan Y.H., Re T.A., Renskers K.J., Scrafford C.G., Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow, Food Chem Toxicol.
Loretz L.J., Api A.M., Babcock L., Barraj L.M., Burdick J., Cater K.C., Jarrett G., Mann S., Pan Y.H., Re T.A., Renskers K.J., Scrafford C.G., Exposure data for cosmetic products: facial cleanser, hair conditioner, and eye shadow, Food Chem Toxicol.
2008 May; 46(5):1516-24, Epub 2007 Dec 23.
2008 May; 46(5):1516-24, Epub 2007 Dec 23.
Mildau G., Burkhard A., Daphi-Weber J., Große-Damhues J., Jung J., Schuster B., Walther C., Basic Requirements for Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, SOFW Journal, 133 6-2007, pp. 16-22.
Mildau G., Burkhard A., Daphi-Weber J., Große-Damhues J., Jung J., Schuster B., Walther C., Basic Requirements for Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, SOFW Journal, 133 6-2007, pp. 16-22.
Miljøstyrelsen, Guideline on Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, Environmental Guidelines No 10 2000.
Miljøstyrelsen, Guideline on Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Products, Environmental Guidelines No 10 2000.
OECD (2007), Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals.
OECD (2007), Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals.
Series on Testing and Assessment, No 80.
Series on Testing and Assessment, No 80.
OECD (2009), Guidance Document for using the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox to Develop Chemical Categories According to the OECD Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals.
OECD (2009), Guidance Document for using the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox to Develop Chemical Categories According to the OECD Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals.
Pauwels M., Rogiers V., Human Health Safety Evaluation of Cosmetics in the EU:
M. Pauwels, V. Rogiers, Human Health Safety Evaluation of Cosmetics in the EU:
A Legally Imposed Challenge to Science, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 243 (2010), pp. 260-274.
A Legally Imposed Challenge to Science, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 243 (2010), s. 260-274.
SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Guidance on safety assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics, SCCS/1484/12.
SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Guidance on safety assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics, SCCS/1484/12.
SCCS, The SCCS’s Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 8
SCCS, The SCCS’s Notes of Guidance for the Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients and their Safety Evaluation, 8
SCCS, SCHER and SCENIHR, Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, 2012.
SCCS, SCHER and SCENIHR, Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures, 2012.
SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), Opinion on the scientific basis for the definition of the term ‘nanomaterial’, 8 December 2010.
SCENIHR (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks), Opinion on the scientific basis for the definition of the term ‘nanomaterial’, 8 December 2010.
Workshop Report ‘Assessment of undesirable events in cosmetic market surveillance:
Workshop Report ‘Assessment of undesirable events in cosmetic market surveillance:
Background, description and use of a causality assessment method in cosmetovigilance’, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 58 (2010) 349–353.
Background, description and use of a causality assessment method in cosmetovigilance’, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 58 (2010) 349–353.
Known Databases Containing Toxicological Data on Substances Used in Cosmetics
Kjente databaser som inneholder toksikologiske data om stoffer som brukes i kosmetiske produkter
ChemIDPlus Light — http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/chemidlite.jsp
ChemIDPlus Light — http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/chemidlite.jsp
ChemIDPlus Advanced — http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/
ChemIDPlus Advanced — http://chem.sis.nlm.nih.gov/chemidplus/
Cosmetics Europe Recommendations — https://www.cosmeticseurope.eu/publications-cosmetics-europe-association/recommendations.html
Cosmetics Europe Recommendations — https://www.cosmeticseurope.eu/publications-cosmetics-europe-association/recommendations.html
IPCS Inchem — http://www.inchem.org/pages/jecfa.html
IPCS Inchem — http://www.inchem.org/pages/jecfa.html
PubMed — http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
PubMed — http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
ToxNet — http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
ToxNet — http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products
om endring av vedlegg III til europaparlaments- og rådsforordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 om kosmetiske produkter
Following the publication of a scientific study in 2001, entitled ‘Use of permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer risk’, the Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers, subsequently replaced by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (‘SCCP’), pursuant to Commission Decision 2004/210/EC of 3 March 2004 setting up Scientific Committees in the field of consumer safety, public health and the environment(
Etter offentliggjøringen av en vitenskapelig undersøkelse i 2001 med tittelen «Use of permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer risk» konkluderte Vitenskapskomiteen for kosmetiske produkter og for varer som ikke er næringsmidler beregnet på forbrukere, som i samsvar med kommisjonsavgjerd 2004/210/EF av 3. mars 2004 om skiping av vitskapsutval på områda forbrukartryggleik, folkehelse og miljø(
The SCCP, in its opinions, recommended that the Commission take further steps to control the use of hair dye substances.
SCCP anbefalte i sine uttalelser at Kommisjonen treffer ytterligere tiltak for å kontrollere bruken av stoffer i hårfargingsmidler.
The SCCP further recommended an overall safety assessment strategy for hair dye substances including the requirements for testing substances used in hair dye products for their potential genotoxicity or mutagenicity.
SCCP anbefalte dessuten en samlet strategi for sikkerhetsvurdering av stoffer som brukes i hårfargingsmidler, herunder krav til prøving av disse stoffenes potensielle genotoksisitet eller arvestoffskadelighet.
Following the opinions of the SCCP, the Commission agreed with Member States and stakeholders on an overall strategy to regulate substances used in hair dye products according to which the industry was required to submit files, containing updated scientific data on the safety of hair dye substances, for a risk assessment by the SCCP.
I samsvar med uttalelser fra SCCP ble Kommisjonen, medlemsstatene og de berørte parter enige om en samlet strategi for lovregulering av stoffer som brukes i hårfargingsmidler, som krever at industrien framlegger dokumentasjon med ajourførte vitenskapelige data om slike stoffers sikkerhet, slik at SCCP kan foreta en risikovurdering.
The SCCP, subsequently replaced by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (‘SCCS’) pursuant to Commission Decision 2008/721/EC of 5 August 2008 setting up an advisory structure of Scientific Committees and experts in the field of consumer safety, public health and the environment and repealing Decision 2004/210/EC(
SCCP, som i samsvar med kommisjonsbeslutning 2008/721/EF av 5. august 2008 om opprettelse av en rådgivningsstruktur med vitenskapskomiteer og sakkyndige på området forbrukersikkerhet, folkehelse og miljø, og om oppheving av avgjerd 2004/210/EF(
As regards the evaluation of possible consumer health risks by reaction products formed by oxidative hair dye substances during the hair dyeing process, based on the data yet available, the SCCS, in its opinion of 21 September 2010, did not raise any major concern regarding genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of hair dyes and their reaction products currently used in the Union.
Når det gjelder vurderingen av mulige helserisikoer som forbrukerne utsettes for gjennom reaksjonsprodukter som under hårfargingsprosessen dannes av oksiderende stoffer som inngår i hårfargingsmidler, fant SCCS, på grunnlag av de data som forelå, i sin uttalelse av 21. september 2010 ingen større grunn til bekymring med hensyn til genotoksisitet og kreftframkallende egenskaper hos de hårfargingsmidlene og deres reaksjonsprodukter som på nåværende tidspunkt er i bruk i Unionen.
In order to ensure the safety of hair dye products for human health it is appropriate to limit the maximum concentrations of 21 assessed hair dye substances and to list them in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, by taking into account the final opinions given by the SCCS on their safety.
De høyeste konsentrasjonene av 21 vurderte stoffer som brukes i hårfargingsmidler, bør begrenses samt føres opp i vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 for å sikre at hårfargingsmidlene er trygge for menneskers helse, idet det tas hensyn til SCCSs endelige uttalelse om deres sikkerhet.
Following the assessment by the SCCS concerning the substance Toluene-2,5-Diamine, listed in entry 9a of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, it is appropriate to change the maximum authorised concentrations thereof in the finished cosmetic product.
På grunnlag av vurderingen fra SCCS vedrørende stoffet toluen-2,5-diamin, som er oppført under nr. 9a i vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009, bør høyeste tillatte konsentrasjon av dette stoffet i det ferdige kosmetiske produktet endres.
The definition of a hair product in Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 excluded its application on eyelashes.
I forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 omfattet definisjonen av et hårprodukt ikke påføring på øyevipper.
This exclusion was motivated by the fact that the level of risk is different when cosmetic products are applied on the hair on the head and on eyelashes respectively.
Unntaket ble begrunnet med at påføring av kosmetiske produkter på hodehår har et annet risikonivå enn påføring på øyevipper.
A specific safety assessment was therefore needed for the application of hair dye substances on eyelashes.
Det var følgelig behov for en egen sikkerhetsvurdering av påføring på øyevipper av stoffer som brukes i hårfargingsmidler.
The SCCS, in its opinion on oxidative hair dye substances and hydrogen peroxide used in products to colour eyelashes of 12 October 2012, concluded that oxidative hair dye substances p-Phenylenediamine, Resorcinol, 6-Methoxy-2-Methylamino-3-Aminopyridine HCl, m-Aminophenol, 2-Methyl-5-Hydroxyethyl Aminophenol, 4-Amino-2-Hydroxytoluene, 2,4-Diaminophenoxyethanol HCl, 4-Amino-m-Cresol, 2-Amino-4-Hydroxyethylaminoanisole and 2,6-Diaminopyridine, listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and found safe for use in hair dye products, can be safely used by professionals in products intended for colouring eyelashes.
I sin uttalelse av 12. oktober 2012 om bruk av oksiderende stoffer som brukes i hårfargingsmidler og hydrogenperoksid i produkter til farging av øyevipper, konkluderte SCCS med at de oksiderende stoffene p-fenylendiamin, resorcinol, 6-metoksy-2-metylamino-3-aminopyridinhydroklorid, m-aminofenol, 2-metyl-5-hydroksyetylaminofenol, 4-amino-2-hydroksytoluen, 2,4-diaminofenoksyetanolhydroklorid, 4-amino-m-kresol, 2-amino-4-hydroksyetylaminoanisol og 2,6-diaminopyridin, som er oppført i vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 og funnet trygge for bruk i hårfargingsmidler, trygt kan brukes av yrkesbrukere i produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper.
In addition, the SCCS concluded that up to 2 % of hydrogen peroxide, which is listed under entry 12 in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, can be considered safe for consumers when applied on eyelashes.
Videre konkluderte SCCS med at hydrogenperoksid, som er oppført under nr. 12 i vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009, kan regnes som trygt for forbrukere ved påføring på øyevipper i en konsentrasjon på opptil 2 %.
On the basis of the scientific assessment of those substances their use should be allowed in products intended for colouring eyelashes in the same concentrations as in hair dye products.
På grunnlag av den vitenskapelige vurderingen av disse stoffene bør de tillates brukt i produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper i samme konsentrasjon som i  hårfargingsmidler.
However, in order to avoid any risk connected with the self-application of products intended for colouring eyelashes by consumers, they should be allowed for professional use only.
Produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper, bør imidlertid bare tillates til yrkesmessig bruk for å unngå risiko forbundet med selvpåføring.
In order to allow professionals to inform consumers about possible adverse effects of eyelash colouring and to lower the risk of skin sensitisation to those products, appropriate warnings should be printed on their labels.
Etiketten på disse produktene bør inneholde advarsler, slik at yrkesbrukere kan informere forbrukere om mulige skadevirkninger forbundet med farging av øyevipper og dermed redusere risikoen for hudsensibilisering.
In order to avoid a disruption on the market due to the transition from Council Directive 76/768/ECC of 27 July 1976 on cosmetic products(
Denne forordning bør få anvendelse fra samme dato som forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 for å unngå markedsforstyrrelse som følge av overgangen fra rådsdirektiv 76/768/EØF av 27. juli 1976 om kosmetiske produkter(
A sufficient transition period should be granted to economic operators in order to comply with the new warnings for products intended for colouring eyelashes.
Markedsdeltakerne bør gis en tilstrekkelig lang overgangsperiode for å kunne overholde bestemmelsene om de nye advarslene for produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.
Vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 endres i samsvar med vedlegget til denne forordning.
However, the following provisions in the Annex shall apply from 1 July 2014:
Følgende bestemmelser i vedlegget får imidlertid anvendelse fra 1. juli 2014:
the provisions in column ‘i’ of point 1 and of points 3 to 9 relating to the use of the substances in products intended for colouring eyelashes;
bestemmelsene i kolonne «i» under nr. 1 og nr. 3-9 om bruk av stoffer i produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper,
points 2 and 10.
nr. 2 og 10.
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is amended as follows:
I vedlegg III til forordning (EF) nr. 1223/2009 gjøres følgende endringer:
the following entry 8b is inserted:
Nytt nr. 8b skal lyde:
‘8b
«8b
106-50-3 / 624-18-0 / 16245-77-5
106-50-3 / 624-18-0 / 16245-77-5
Products intended for colouring eyelashes
Produkter beregnet på farging av øyevipper
After mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to eyelashes must not exceed 2 % calculated as free base
Etter blanding under oksiderende forhold skal den høyeste konsentrasjonen som brukes på øyevipper, ikke overstige 2 % beregnet som fri base.
Temporary ‘black henna’ tattoos may increase the risk of allergy.
Midlertidige tatoveringer med svart henna kan øke risikoen for allergi.
Eyelashes shall not be coloured if the consumer:
Øyevipper skal ikke farges dersom forbrukeren:
has a rash on the face or sensitive, irritated and damaged scalp,
har utslett i ansiktet eller følsom, irritert og skadd hodebunn,
has experienced any reaction after colouring hair or eyelashes,
tidligere har hatt en reaksjon etter farging av hår eller øyevipper,
has experienced a reaction to a temporary ‘black henna’ tattoo in the past.
tidligere har hatt en reaksjon på en midlertidig tatovering med svart henna.
Wear suitable gloves.”
Bruk egnede hansker.
entry 9a is replaced by the following:
nr. 9a skal lyde:
1,4-Benzenediamine, 2-methyl-
1,4-benzendiamin, 2-metyl-
2,5-Diaminotoluene sulphate
2,5-diaminotoluensulfat
Toluene-2,5-Diamine sulfate (1)
Toluene-2,5-Diamine sulfate(
95-70-5
95-70-5
After mixing under oxidative conditions the maximum concentration applied to hair must not exceed 2 % (calculated as free base) or 3,6 % (calculated as sulfate salt)
Etter blanding under oksiderende forhold skal den høyeste konsentrasjonen som brukes på hår, ikke overstige 2 % (beregnet som fri base) eller 3,6 % (beregnet som sulfatsalt).
entry 12 is replaced by the following:
nr. 12 skal lyde:
‘12
«12
For (a) and (f):
For a) og f):
For (a) (b) (c) and (e):
For a), b), c) og e):