natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
M. kadangi būtina taikyti kovos su terorizmu priemones, būtent: propaguoti naujas taiką skatinančias iniciatyvas ir tarpininkavimą susiskaldžiusiose ir konfliktuojančiose bendruomenėse, prekybos, pagalbos ir investicijų srityse nustatant ilgalaikes politikos strategijas, kurios leistų kovoti su skurdu ir stiprinti nacionaliniu bei pasauliniu lygiu demokratines institucijas ir tam skirtų iniciatyvų skaidrumą;
M. whereas it is necessary to implement measures for combating terrorism, notably through the promotion of new initiatives for peacemaking and mediation in societies which are marked by conflicts and division, by adopting long-term trade, aid and investment policies that advance the fight against poverty and help strengthen democratic institutions and transparency at national and at global level through initiatives which may contribute to these goals,
N. kadangi vien demokratija ir besąlygiška pagarba žmogaus teisėms ir pagrindinėms laisvėms gali užtikrinti veiksmingą Europos atsaką kovoje su terorizmu;
N. whereas only democracy and absolute respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms can guarantee an effective European response in the fight against terrorism,
O. kadangi teroristų taikomos priemonės – žudynės, kankinimai, persekiojimai, pagrobimai ir grasinimai – yra tokios smerktinos ir niekingos, kad jokiu būdu negali būti pateisinamos; kadangi siekiant susidoroti su terorizmu būtina užkirsti kelią bet kokiems bandymams teroro išpuolius pateisinti remiantis moraliniu, priežasties ar politiniu pagrindu (ši priemonė nekliudo tirti teroro priežasčių ir veikti aplinką, kurioje asmuo gali būti skatinamas tapti teroristu);
O. whereas the murders, torture, persecution, kidnappings and threats perpetrated by terrorists are human actions so base and reprehensible that they can in no way be justified; whereas the exclusion of their acts from any moral, causal or political consideration is a necessary means of defeating them, although this will not preclude consideration of and action regarding the context and the environment which may drive people to become terrorists,
P. kadangi Europos Sąjunga jau įrodė savo solidarumą su teroro aukomis būtent šiomis priemonėmis:
P. whereas the EU has already demonstrated its solidarity with the victims of terrorism, above all through:
- 2004 m. kovo 25 d. deklaracija, kuria Europos Vadovų Taryba kovo 11 d. paskelbė Europos terorizmo aukų diena;
- the Declaration of 25 March 2004 in which the European Council declared 11 March to be the European day of the victims of terrorism;
15. , įskaitant teroro išpuolių aukas;
15 , including those who are the victims of terrorist acts;
- 2004 m. įkūrusi bandomąją programą psichologinės, medicininės ir socialinės pagalbos terorizmo aukoms ir jų šeimoms projektams finansuoti,
- the establishment in 2004 of a pilot programme to fund projects for psychological, medical and social assistance to victims of terrorism and their families;
ir kadangi šios priemonės turi būti plėtojamos ir atnaujinamos;
and whereas these measures should be extended and updated,
Q. kadangi demokratijos požiūriu teroro aukos turi simbolinę reikšmę ir valdžios institucijos turi jas išklausyti ir užtikrinti, kad į jų nuomones būtų atsižvelgiama priimant sprendimus, kaip kovoti su tais, kurie jas privertė dalyvauti šioje kovoje;
Q. whereas the victims of terrorism are a reference for democracy and whereas the public authorities must heed their voice and ensure that they are taken into account in the places where decisions are made to combat those who have made them unwilling protagonists,
1. dėl minėto peržiūrėto ES kovos su terorizmu veiksmų plano (darbo programos) Tarybai ir Europos Vadovų Tarybai rekomenduoja:
a) that a European unit responsible for policies designed to assist the victims of terrorism be created under the direct authority and responsibility of the European Anti-Terrorism Coordinator.
a) įkurti už teroro aukų naudai vykdomą politiką atsakingą, tiesiogiai Europos kovos su terorizmu koordinatoriui pavaldžią instituciją, kuri bus Europos politikos atramos taškas šioje srityje; šios institucijos uždavinys – priimti, išklausyti, informuoti ir remti aukas bei skatinti priemones, būtinas siekiant jos veiklos sėkmės;
This unit will be a reference point for European policy in this field and its purpose will be to take in, listen to, inform and assist victims and to promote implementation of the measures which are necessary if it is to operate successfully.
ši institucija kasmet rengtų Europos teroro aukų forumą, kuriame susitiktų Europos Sąjungos institucijų, Europos Tarybos, nacionalinių parlamentų ir vyriausybių bei teroro aukų asociacijų ir fondų atstovai;
The unit will organise a European Forum for the Victims of Terrorism, to be attended by representatives of the EU institutions, the Council of Europe and the Member States' parliaments and governments, and also by representatives of associations and foundations for victims of terrorism.
pagrindinė šio forumo paskirtis – užtikrinti, kad aukų balsas būtų išgirstas ir į jį nuosekliai atsižvelgtų kompetentingos valdžios institucijos;
The Forum's most important task will be to ensure that the appropriate authorities listen to what the victims have to say and take relevant action periodically;
c) tikrąja Sutarties dėl Konstitucijos Europai prasme skatinti nacionalinių institucijų ir prokuratūrų bei Eurojusto bendradarbiavimą visų sunkių tarpvalstybinių nusikaltimų tyrimų, jų kaltininkų, ypač teroristų ir jų bendrininkų, persekiojimo baudžiamąja tvarka ir patraukimo baudžiamojon atsakomybėn tikslais, bei sukurti teisines sąlygas, kurios įgalintų įsteigti šių tikslų siekiančią Europos prokuratūrą;
c) that, in accordance with the spirit of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, cooperation between national authorities, public prosecutors and Eurojust be promoted in order to investigate, pursue and sentence all perpetrators of serious cross-border crimes, particularly the crime of terrorism, and their accomplices, and that the legal conditions be established to enable a European Public Prosecutor's Office to be set up to pursue those objectives;
d) skatinti Europolo statuso pakeitimą į demokratinei Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos kontrolei pavaldų ir Teisingumo Teismo jurisdikcijai priklausantį Europos Sąjungos organą ir sukurti Bendrijos mastu galiojantį teisinį pagrindą Europolo veiklai įteisinti prieš įsigaliojant Sutarčiai dėl Konstitucijos Europai;
d) that the transformation of Europol into a EU body under the democratic control of the European Parliament and the Council and under the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice be promoted, and that to this end a common legal basis now be created for the work of Europol prior to the entry into force of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe;
e) teikti pirmenybę valstybių narių žvalgybos tarnybų ir Europolo keitimosi prevencine informacija priemonių stiprinimui visada užtikrinant, jog laikomasi duomenų apsaugos reikalavimų; stiprinti Europolo ir Eurojusto bendradarbiavimo ir informacijos mainų mechanizmus nustatant jų bendradarbiavimo sąlygas;
e) that priority be given to strengthening the means for exchanging preventive information by the intelligence services of Member States among themselves and with Europol without ever contravening the principles of data protection; that mechanisms for cooperation and information exchange between Europol and Eurojust be fostered, with the arrangements for cooperation between the two to be specified;
f) Komisijai pasiūlius priimti sprendimą, kuriuo ES kovos su terorizmu koordinatoriaus pareigybė būtų perkelta į Komisiją ir būtų numatyta veiksminga ES koordinatoriaus veiksmų parlamentinė kontrolė;
f) that a decision be adopted, proposed by the Commission, to provide for the transfer of the European anti-terrorist coordinator to the Commission, and also for effective parliamentary control of the European coordinator's activities;
g) reikalauti iš Komisijos pasirūpinti, kad visi kovos su terorizmu srityje galiojantys Europos Sąjungos teisės aktai būtų nuosekliai perkeliami į nacionalinę teisę ir periodiškai rengti sąrašą valstybių narių, kurios nacionaliniu lygmeniu dar nėra įgyvendinusios šių priemonių;
g) that the Commission be required to monitor the transposition into national law and the complete and faithful implementation of all judicial anti-terrorist instruments adopted by the EU, and periodically to draw up a list of Member States which have not yet incorporated such measures into national law;
h) iki 2005 m. pabaigos kartu su Europos Parlamentu kruopščiai įvertinti peržiūrėto Europos Sąjungos kovos su terorizmu veiksmų plano vykdymą, siekiant nustatyti jo įvykdymo lygį ir veiksmingumą užtikrinant visuomenės saugumą ir asmens laisvę; atliekant vertinimą būtina atsižvelgti į taikytų priemonių veiksmingumą ir tinkamumą bei įvykių raidą; šis vertinimas turėtų būti atliekamas kasmet;
h) that a detailed assessment be made by the end of 2005, in consultation with the European Parliament, of the implementation of the revised anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme, in order to ascertain its effectiveness and the extent to which it has been followed, with the dual aim of safeguarding collective security and individual freedom; this assessment should take account of the effectiveness and proportionality of the measures adopted, and of any new developments, and should be carried out every year;
i) ištirti projektus ir įgyvendinimą naujų teisės aktų, kuriais veiksmingiau kovojama su nelegaliais teroristinės veiklos finansavimo šaltiniais ir jų lėšų paskirstymo kanalais;
i) that a study be carried out into the design and implementation of new judicial instruments with a view to more effective pursuit of the collection and distribution of sources of finance for terrorist activities processed on the margins of legally established financial bodies;
j) raginti valstybes nares pasirašyti ir ratifikuoti 12 esamų tarptautinių kovos su terorizmu konvencijų ir priimti aštuonias specialiąsias EBPO rekomendacijas dėl kovos su terorizmo finansavimu bei visas su ES ryšius palaikančias trečiąsias šalis raginti padaryti tą patį;
j) that all the Member States be required to sign and ratify the 12 existing international anti-terrorist conventions; that the eight special recommendations produced by the OECD to combat the financing of terrorism be adopted; and that all third countries with which the EU maintains relations be required to do the same;
k) raginti Komisiją nustatyti ir ištirti valstybių narių ir trečiųjų šalių kovos su terorizmu ir radikalumo prevencijos srityje parengtas pažangiausias strategijas, kurios galėtų sudaryti Komisijos strategijos pagrindą;
k) that the Commission be called on to identify and study best practice in the Member States and third countries in the area of anti-terrorist policies and the prevention of radicalisation, which could form the basis for Commission recommendations;
l) sudaryti visuomenės informavimo šviečiamąsias programas, kuriomis būtų siekiama:
l) that educational programmes delivered through the media be funded and developed with a view to:
– smerkti bet kokio pobūdžio smurtą, ypač terorizmą;
– condemning all forms of violence, especially terrorism;
– kovoti su socialine aplinka, kurioje sąlygos palankios klestėti rasinei, religinei ar ideologinei neapykantai;
– combating environments which foster and are a breeding ground for racial, religious or ideological hatred;
m) kaip nustatyta Sutartyje dėl Konstitucijos Europai ir ES sutarties 42 straipsnyje, raginti valstybes nares priimti sprendimą, kurio paskirtis – ES sutarties 29 straipsnyje numatytas kovos su terorizmu ir tarptautinu nusikalstamumu priemones įtraukti į Europos Bendrijos sutarties IV antraštinę dalį, dėl jų spręsti taikant bendro sprendimo su Europos Parlamentu procedūrą ir Tarybos kvalifikuotos balsų daugumos pritarimo procedūrą bei priskirti jas Teisingumo Teismo jurisdikcijai;
m) that, in compliance with the spirit of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and with Article 42 of the EU Treaty, the Member States be urged to adopt a decision to ensure that acts under Article 29 of the EU Treaty to combat terrorism and crossborder crime be included in Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community and be subject to codecision with the European Parliament and qualified majority voting in Council, under the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice;
n) kovą su terorizmu suvokti kaip Sąjungos prioritetą ir esminę išorės politikos dalį, kaip numatyta Europos saugumo strategijoje, bei terorizmą (tiksliau – teroristinius išpuolius, kurių imasi radikalių pažiūrų grupės, motyvuodamos islamo gynyba) ir masinio naikinimo ginklų platinimą laikyti pagrindine Europos piliečių problema bei grėsme demokratijai, teisinei valstybei, Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartijai ir Jungtinių Tautų chartijai;
n) that the fight against terrorism be seen as a priority of the Union and a key part of its external action under the European Security Strategy, and that terrorism, and more specifically terrorism by radical groups that claim to defend Islam, especially if taken together with the threat of proliferation of WMDs, should be seen as the main problem that European citizens face, and as a threat to democracy, the rule of law, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the UN Charter;
o) šį vidaus ir išorės politikos prioritetą aiškiai išdėstyti trečiosioms šalims, su kuriomis ES palaiko ryšius;
o) that this internal and external priority be made absolutely clear in all dealings with third countries;
p) atsižvelgti į tai, jog terorizmas, su terorizmu susijusios organizacijos, terorizmą remiančios, finansuojančios ir teroristines priemones taikančios valstybės ir nevalstybiniai veikėjai yra itin nevienalyčio pobūdžio ir tai, kad terorizmas yra naujas ir nenumatomas reiškinys, kuriam ypač aktualus laikas (tai ypač būdinga teroristų išpuoliams, kurių imasi radikalių pažiūrų grupės, motyvuodamos islamo gynyba), ir į tai, kad kovodama su terorizmu Sąjunga turi neatidėliodama plėtoti veikiau iniciatyvinę negu atsakomąją politiką;
p) that account be taken of: the diverse nature of terrorism, the organisations involved in it and the states and non-state actors that sponsor, finance and practise it for their own purposes; the fact that terrorism is an emerging and unpredictable phenomenon with its own specific sense of time (this applies in particular to terrorism by radical groups that claim to defend Islam); and the urgent need for the Union to develop a proactive – rather than just reactive – policy to combat it;
q) vadovautis principu, kad išorės veiksmai, kuriais kovojama su valstybių ir ne tik jų finansuojamais ar vykdomais teroro išpuoliais, negali būti iš tiesų efektyvūs, jeigu jie nėra grindžiami tikru pačios Sąjungos įsitikinimu ir ryžtu bei palaikomi išsamiai informuotos visuomenės;
q) that the basic tenet be adopted that no action against terrorism sponsored or practised by non-state actors externally can be truly effective if it is not backed up by real conviction and determination within the Union and supported by a well-informed general public;
r) imtis visų kovos su teroristų organizacijomis priemonių atsižvelgiant į tai, kad kiekviena iš šių organizacijų turi savo tikslus, organizacinę struktūrą ir veiklos būdą;
r) that specific measures be adopted to combat all terrorist organisations, taking into account the fact that each has its own objectives, organisational structure and modus operandi;
INTRODUCTION - TERRORISM TODAY
INTRODUCTION - TERRORISM TODAY
Terrorism today constitutes one of the most serious and enduring threats against all EU Member States and the world.
Terrorism today constitutes one of the most serious and enduring threats against all EU Member States and the world.
The terrorist threat today is not limited to specific geographical areas in which terrorists commit acts of terror and violence to promote their causes.
The terrorist threat today is not limited to specific geographical areas in which terrorists commit acts of terror and violence to promote their causes.
Terrorists today operate through international and crossborder networks, using methods which can have devastating effects on different countries at the same time.
Terrorists today operate through international and crossborder networks, using methods which can have devastating effects on different countries at the same time.
Terrorism is not a new phenomenon in the EU, as it has posed a permanent threat for many years to democracy, the free exercise of human rights and economic and social development in several Member States.
Terrorism is not a new phenomenon in the EU, as it has posed a permanent threat for many years to democracy, the free exercise of human rights and economic and social development in several Member States.
Since the tragic events of 11 September 2001 in New York and Washington and the terrorist attacks which followed, no-one can doubt the fact that one of the major challenges facing mankind in the 21st century is the fight against terrorism.
Since the tragic events of 11 September 2001 in New York and Washington and the terrorist attacks which followed, no-one can doubt the fact that one of the major challenges facing mankind in the 21st century is the fight against terrorism.
As Europeans, we can state that our greatest challenge today is security, with terrorism our greatest risk.
As Europeans, we can state that our greatest challenge today is security, with terrorism our greatest risk.
A new form of terrorism has been added to what could previously have been called domestic terrorism, namely Islamic fundamentalism.
A new form of terrorism has been added to what could previously have been called domestic terrorism, namely Islamic fundamentalism.
This is a form of terrorism to which we do not know how to respond and which the European Coordinator of the Fight against Terrorism, Gijs de Vries, defines as 'terrorism of mass destruction' on the basis of the strategies it uses to commit its attacks.
This is a form of terrorism to which we do not know how to respond and which the European Coordinator of the Fight against Terrorism, Gijs de Vries, defines as 'terrorism of mass destruction' on the basis of the strategies it uses to commit its attacks.
THE EU FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM
THE EU FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM
Justification and need
Justification and need
Terrorism is a frontal attack on human rights and the plurality of democratic societies.
Terrorism is a frontal attack on human rights and the plurality of democratic societies.
The EU is obliged to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and to guarantee to European citizens that it meets its obligations effectively, particularly those which derive from the provisions in the Treaty on European Union in the fourth indent of Article 2, Article 6(4) or Article 29, which obliges the Union to 'provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice', a point reiterated in Article 257(3) of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
The EU is obliged to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and to guarantee to European citizens that it meets its obligations effectively, particularly those which derive from the provisions in the Treaty on European Union in the fourth indent of Article 2, Article 6(4) or Article 29, which obliges the Union to 'provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice', a point reiterated in Article 257(3) of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.
No Member State can combat the terrorist phenomenon by itself.
No Member State can combat the terrorist phenomenon by itself.
The safety of the citizens of Europe is indivisible and the existing situation is unacceptable in which criminals and terrorists can travel freely throughout EU territory whilst the 25 judicial, penal and police frontiers continue to exist between the 25 EU Member States.
The safety of the citizens of Europe is indivisible and the existing situation is unacceptable in which criminals and terrorists can travel freely throughout EU territory whilst the 25 judicial, penal and police frontiers continue to exist between the 25 EU Member States.
The citizens of Europe en masse are urgently demanding that the EU combat the terrorist threat effectively, with determination and without respite, using all the means at its disposal and creating new instruments when necessary, based on common shared values of liberty and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
The citizens of Europe en masse are urgently demanding that the EU combat the terrorist threat effectively, with determination and without respite, using all the means at its disposal and creating new instruments when necessary, based on common shared values of liberty and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.
The impact of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 and the anti-terrorism Action Plan
The impact of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 and the anti-terrorism Action Plan
The EU Member States began cooperating intergovernmentally on terrorism-related matters as long ago as 1975 within the framework of the 'Trevi Group'.
The EU Member States began cooperating intergovernmentally on terrorism-related matters as long ago as 1975 within the framework of the 'Trevi Group'.
Subsequently, the Treaties of Maastricht in 1992, Amsterdam in 1997 and Nice in 2001 conferred anti-terrorism powers on the EU, the mandates of which were gathered in the 'Vienna Action Plan' of 1998 and in the conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 1999.
Subsequently, the Treaties of Maastricht in 1992, Amsterdam in 1997 and Nice in 2001 conferred anti-terrorism powers on the EU, the mandates of which were gathered in the 'Vienna Action Plan' of 1998 and in the conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 1999.
The 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States of America were the catalyst that accelerated the adoption of a wide range of anti-terrorist measures.
The 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States of America were the catalyst that accelerated the adoption of a wide range of anti-terrorist measures.
From that date onwards, the fight against terrorism became one of the priorities of the Member States and of the EU and its institutions.
From that date onwards, the fight against terrorism became one of the priorities of the Member States and of the EU and its institutions.
At its extraordinary meeting of 21 September 2001, the European Council adopted an 'Anti-terrorism Action Plan' which was followed by the adoption of a very detailed 'Work Programme' designed to put it into practice.
At its extraordinary meeting of 21 September 2001, the European Council adopted an 'Anti-terrorism Action Plan' which was followed by the adoption of a very detailed 'Work Programme' designed to put it into practice.
The results were immediate, and political agreement was reached at the Laeken European Council of 15 December 2001, which allowed:
The results were immediate, and political agreement was reached at the Laeken European Council of 15 December 2001, which allowed:
a) the creation of the European arrest warrant in June 2002 and of surrender procedures between Member States, in place of slow, inefficient extradition mechanisms;
a) the creation of the European arrest warrant in June 2002 and of surrender procedures between Member States, in place of slow, inefficient extradition mechanisms;
b) a harmonised definition of terrorism and the corresponding punishments in all Member States;
b) a harmonised definition of terrorism and the corresponding punishments in all Member States;
c) the creation of joint investigation teams.
c) the creation of joint investigation teams.
Furthermore, the JHA Council of 28 February 2002 reached the political agreement creating Eurojust and implementing orders for freezing assets or evidence in the EU.
Furthermore, the JHA Council of 28 February 2002 reached the political agreement creating Eurojust and implementing orders for freezing assets or evidence in the EU.