natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Agreement is one of the agreements the conclusion of which is provided for in Article IV of the Bonn Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, with a view to protecting migratory species with an unfavourable conservation status.
The Agreement is one of the agreements the conclusion of which is provided for in Article IV of the Bonn Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, with a view to protecting migratory species with an unfavourable conservation status.
The AEWA protects 235 species of birds which are ecologically dependent on wetlands in particular in Africa and Eurasia.
The AEWA protects 235 species of birds which are ecologically dependent on wetlands in particular in Africa and Eurasia.
The Agreement above all requires coordinated measures for achieving and maintaining a favourable conservation status for migratory waterbird species using African-Eurasian flyways.
The Agreement above all requires coordinated measures for achieving and maintaining a favourable conservation status for migratory waterbird species using African-Eurasian flyways.
Annex 3 (Action Plan) sets out measures to be taken for priority species by the contracting parties in conjunction with the general conservation measures laid down in Article III of the Agreement.
Annex 3 (Action Plan) sets out measures to be taken for priority species by the contracting parties in conjunction with the general conservation measures laid down in Article III of the Agreement.
2) Substance of the Commission proposal
2) Substance of the Commission proposal
The Commission proposes that the Agreement be approved on behalf of the Community and that the President of the Council be authorised to arrange for the deposit of the instrument of approval.
The Commission proposes that the Agreement be approved on behalf of the Community and that the President of the Council be authorised to arrange for the deposit of the instrument of approval.
The Commission is authorised to negotiate any amendments to the Action Plan and the amendments provided for by Article X.
The Commission is authorised to negotiate any amendments to the Action Plan and the amendments provided for by Article X.
3) Rapporteur's position
3) Rapporteur's position
The rapporteur sees the conclusion of the Agreement as an important step with regard to the conservation of migratory species of wild animals, and takes the view that the Agreement complements existing Community legislation.
Your rapporteur sees the conclusion of the Agreement as an important step with regard to the conservation of migratory species of wild animals, and takes the view that the Agreement complements existing Community legislation.
He regrets the fact that, following the setting of a new date for the Third Meeting of the Parties (MOP-3) in Dakar, Senegal, it will not be possible for the Community to become a Party to the Agreement in time for this meeting.
He regrets the fact that, following the setting of a new date for the Third Meeting of the Parties (MOP-3) in Dakar, Senegal, it will not be possible for the Community to become a Party to the Agreement in time for this meeting.
Furthermore, the rapporteur considers that the Commission's mandate (under Article 3) goes too far.
Furthermore, your rapporteur considers that the Commission's negotiating mandate (under Article 3) goes too far.
It is not appropriate to authorise the Commission to negotiate all amendments to the Agreement.
It is not appropriate to authorise the Commission to negotiate all amendments to the Agreement.
The negotiating mandate should, rather, as is usual with international agreements, be confined to the Annexes to the Agreement (i.e. amendments pursuant to Article X(5)).
The negotiating mandate should, rather, as is usual with international agreements, be confined to the Annexes to the Agreement (i.e. amendments pursuant to Article X(5)).
The right to enter a reservation against an amendment under Article X(5) should, for reasons of practicability and efficiency, be conferred on the Commission.
The right to enter a reservation with respect to an amendment under Article X(5) should, for reasons of practicability and efficiency, be conferred on the Commission.
TEISĖS REIKALŲ KOMITETO NUOMONĖ DĖL TEISINIO PAGRINDO
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS
Aplinkos apsaugos, visuomenės sveikatos ir maisto saugos komiteto
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Dėl: Pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos sprendimo dėl Europos bendrijos Susitarimo dėl Afrikos ir Eurazijos migruojančių vandens paukščių išsaugojimo ( KOM(2004)0531 – C6–0048/2005 – 2004/0181(CNS) )
Subject: Legal basis of the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds ( COM(2004)0531 – C6‑0048/2005 – 2004/0181(CNS) )
Dar nepaskelbtas OL. sudarymo teisinis pagrindas
Not yet published in the OJ
2005 m. balandžio 13 d. laišku pagal Darbo tvarkos taisyklių 35 straipsnio 2 dalį Jūs kreipėtės į Teisės reikalų komitetą, kad šis apsvarstytų minėto Komisijos pasiūlymo teisinio pagrindo teisėtumą ir tinkamumą.
By letter of 13 April 2005 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2) to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Siūlomas Tarybos sprendimo teisinis pagrindas yra EB sutarties 175 straipsnio 1 dalis, sietina su 300 straipsnio 2 dalies pirmos pastraipos pirmuoju sakiniu, ir 300 straipsnio 3 dalies pirmoji pastraipa.
The legal basis proposed for the Council decision is Article 175(1) in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300(2), first subparagraph, and Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty.
Komitetas šį klausimą apsvarstė per savo 2005 m. gegužės 24 d. posėdį.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 24 May 2005.
Atsižvelgiant į Europos Bendrijų Teisingumo Teismo praktiką įprasta kad teisinį pagrindą Bendrijos teisės aktus leidžianti institucija parenka ne savo nuožiūra, jis turi būti paremtas objektyviais veiksniais ir teisiškai patikrinamas.
It is clear from the settled case law of the European Court of Justice (CJEC) that the choice of legal basis is not left to the discretion of the Community legislator but must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review.
Tarp tokių veiksnių vieni iš svarbesnių yra akto tikslas ir turinys
These factors include in particular the aim and the content of the legal act
OL L 210, 1982 7 19, p.
OJ L 210, 19.7.1982, p.
Bonos konvencijos IV straipsnyje numatoma, kad siekiant apsaugoti nepalankioje padėtyje atsidūrusias gyvūnų rūšis kaip įmanoma greičiau turi būti sudaromos regioninės sutartys.
Article IV of the Bonn Convention provides for the conclusion of regional agreements which, for species with an unfavourable conservation status, should be concluded as soon as possible.
Reikia nedelsiant atkreipti dėmesį į migruojančius Afrikos ir Eurazijos vandens paukščius ir pagerinti jų apsaugą bei sukaupti daugiau informacijos, kuri yra būtina norint priimti reikalingus sprendimus.
The waterbirds of the African-Eurasian flyways merit immediate attention in order to improve their conservation status and to gather information as a basis for sound management decisions.
African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement, AEWA) bendru sutarimu priėmė ir 63 paplitimo zonos valstybės, ir Europos bendrija.
The AEWA regional agreement was adopted by consensus by 63 Range States and by the European Community.
Šiuo susitarimu norima sukurti bendros paplitimo zonos valstybių politikos siekiant apsaugoti Palearktikoje ir Afrikoje migruojančių vandens paukščių rūšis ir populiacijas, nepriklausomai nuo jų apsaugos būklės, teisinį pagrindą.
This agreement aims at creating the legal framework for a concerted conservation policy of the Range States of migratory waterbirds species and populations, individuals of which migrate in the Western Palaearctic and Africa, irrespective of their current conservation status.
Pagal AEWA susitarimą ir ypač jo 4 straipsnį numatoma sukurti sprendimų priėmimo organą, vadinamą Šalių susitikimu ir sudarytą iš susitariančiųjų šalių atstovų, turinčių įgaliojimus iš dalies keisti susitarimą ir prie jo pridedamą veiksmų planą.
The AEWA agreement and, more particularly, Article VI thereof, provides for a decision-making body called the Meeting of the Parties made up of representatives of the signatory parties and which is empowered to amend the agreement as such as well as the action plan annexed thereto.
Turėdama tokią galią ir būdama Šalių susitikimo narė bei vadovaudamasi pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos sprendimo 3 straipsniu Europos Komisija yra įgaliota Bendrijos vardu derėtis ir pritarti visiems veiksmų plano pakeitimams, kaip numatyta AEWA Susitarimo IV straipsnyje
By virtue of the exercise of such a power as a member of the Meeting of the Parties , the European Commission is authorised, on the basis of Article 3 of the proposal for a Council decision, to negotiate and approve, on behalf of the Community, any amendments to the action plan provided for by Article IV
IV straipsnis: Veiksmų planas ir Išsaugojimo gairės
ARTICLE IV: Action Plan and Conservation Guidelines
Veiksmų planas pateikiamas šio Susitarimo 3 priede.
An Action Plan is appended as Annex 3 to this Agreement.
Pagal toliau nurodytus skyrius, atitinkančius šio Susitarimo III straipsnyje nustatytas bendrąsias išsaugojimo priemones, Veiksmų plane nurodyti veiksmai, kurių Šalys privalo imtis dėl prioritetinių rūšių ir problemų:
It specifies actions which the Parties shall undertake in relation to priority species and issues, under the following headings, consistent with the general conservation measures specified in Article III of this Agreement:
a) rūšių išsaugojimas;
(a) species conservation;
b) buveinių išsaugojimas;
(b) habitat conservation;
c) žmonių veiklos valdymas;
(c) management of human activities;
d) moksliniai tyrimai ir stebėsena;
(d) research and monitoring;
e) švietimas ir informacija;
(e) education and information; and
Veiksmų planas iš naujo svarstomas kiekvienoje Šalių susitikimo eilinėje sesijoje, atsižvelgiant į Išsaugojimo gaires.
The Action Plan shall be reviewed at each ordinary session of the Meeting of the Parties, taking into account the Conservation Guidelines.
Visus Veiksmų plano pakeitimus priima Šalių susitikimas, atsižvelgdamas į šio Susitarimo III straipsnio nuostatas.
Any amendment to the Action Plan shall be adopted by the Meeting of the Parties, taking into consideration the provisions of Article III of this Agreement.
X STRAIPSNIS: Susitarimo pakeitimai
ARTICLE X: Amendment of the Agreement
Šis Susitarimas gali būti iš dalies pakeistas eilinės arba neeilinės Šalių susitikimo sesijos metu.
This Agreement may be amended at any ordinary or extraordinary session of the Meeting of the Parties.
Bet kuri Šalis gali siūlyti Susitarimo pakeitimus.
Proposals for amendment may be made by any Party.
Siūlomo pakeitimo tekstas ir jo pagrindimas perduodamas Susitarimo sekretoriatui likus ne mažiau kaip šimtui penkiasdešimčiai dienų iki sesijos pradžios.
The text of any proposed amendment and the reasons for it shall be communicated to the Agreement secretariat not less than one hundred and fifty days before the opening of the session.
Susitarimo sekretoriatas siūlymo kopijas nedelsdamas perduoda Šalims.
The Agreement secretariat shall transmit copies forthwith to the Parties.
Visas savo pastabas dėl pateikto teksto Šalys perduoda Susitarimo sekretoriatui likus ne mažiau kaip šešiasdešimčiai dienų iki sesijos pradžios.
Any comments on the text by the Parties shall be communicated to the Agreement secretariat not less than sixty days before the opening of the session.
Po paskutinės pastabų pateikimo termino dienos Sekretoriatas Šalims kuo skubiau praneša visas iki tos dienos gautas pastabas.
The Secretariat shall, as soon as possible after the last day for submission of comments, communicate to the Parties all comments submitted by that day.
Kiekvienas Susitarimo pakeitimas, išskyrus jo priedų pakeitimus, priimamas dviejų trečdalių dalyvaujančių ir balsuojančių Šalių balsų dauguma ir toms Šalims, kurios jį priėmė, įsigalioja trisdešimtą dieną nuo tos dienos, kai du trečdaliai Šalių, kurios pakeitimo priėmimo dieną buvo Susitarimo Šalimis, deponuoja depozitarui savo pakeitimo priėmimo dokumentus.
An amendment to the Agreement other than an amendment to its annexes shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority of the Parties present and voting and shall enter into force for those Parties which have accepted it on the thirtieth day after the date on which two thirds of the Parties to the Agreement at the date of the adoption of the amendment have deposited their instruments of acceptance of the amendment with the Depository.
Kiekvienai Šaliai, kuri savo priėmimo dokumentą deponuoja po tos dienos, kai du trečdaliai Šalių deponavo savo priėmimo dokumentus, pakeitimas įsigalioja trisdešimtą dieną nuo tos dienos, kai ji deponuoja savo priėmimo dokumentą.
For each Party which deposits an instrument of acceptance after the date on which two thirds of the Parties have deposited their instruments of acceptance, the amendment shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date on which it deposits its instrument of acceptance.
Bet kurie papildomi priedai ir priedo pakeitimai priimami dviejų trečdalių dalyvaujančių ir balsuojančių Šalių balsų dauguma ir įsigalioja visoms Šalims devyniasdešimtą dieną nuo tos dienos, kai juos priėmė Šalių susitikimas, išskyrus Šalis, kurios padarė išlygą pagal šio straipsnio 6 dalį.
Any additional annexes and any amendment to an annex shall be adopted by a two-thirds majority of the Parties present and voting and shall enter into force for all Parties on the ninetieth day after the date of its adoption by the Meeting of the Parties, except for Parties which have entered a reservation in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article.
Per šio straipsnio 5 dalyje numatytą devyniasdešimties dienų laikotarpį bet kuri Šalis, apie tai raštu pranešusi depozitarui, gali padaryti bet kurio papildomo priedo ar priedo pakeitimo išlygą.
During the period of ninety days provided for in paragraph 5 of this Article, any Party may by written notification to the Depository enter a reservation with respect to an additional annex or an amendment to an annex.
Tokią išlygą galima atšaukti bet kuriuo metu, apie tai raštu pranešus depozitarui, ir po to papildomas priedas ar pakeitimas tai Šaliai įsigalioja trisdešimtą dieną nuo tos dienos, kai ji atšaukė išlygą. .
Such reservation may be withdrawn at any time by written notification to the Depository, and thereupon the additional annex or the amendment shall enter into force for that Party on the thirtieth day after the date of withdrawal of the reservation. .
Vis dėlto Komisija turėtų vesti šias derybas konsultuodamasi su specialiu Tarybos paskirtu komitetu.
However, the Commission should conduct these negotiations in consultation with a special committee designated by the Council.
Išnagrinėjus aptariamo Susitarimo keitimo tvarką reikėtų pažymėti, kad Šalių susitikimas yra sprendimų priėmimo organas, galintis priimti pakeitimus taikydamas supaprastintą procedūrą:
After examination of the procedure for amendment of the agreement in question, it can be stated that the Meeting of the Parties constitutes the decision-making body which is capable of adopting amendments under a simplified procedure:
· Šalių susitikimas sprendimus priima bendru sutarimu, o jeigu jo neįmanoma pasiekti – dalyvaujančių ir balsuojančių šalių dviejų trečdalių balsų daugumą;
● Decisions of the Meeting of the Parties shall be adopted by consensus or, if consensus cannot be achieved, by a two-thirds majority of the Parties present and voting;
· Teisę balsuoti turi tik šalys.
● Only Parties have the right to vote.
Kiekviena šalis turi vieną balsą, tačiau Susitarimo šalimis esančios regioninės ekonominės integracijos organizacijos savo įgaliojimų srityse turi balso teisę, lygią tiek balsų, kiek yra jų valstybių narių.
Each Party shall have one vote, but regional economic integration organisations which are Parties to this Agreement shall, in matters within their competence, exercise their right to vote with a number of votes equal to the number of their Member States.
Dėl to atrodytų, kad EB sutarties 300 straipsnio 4 dalis
Consequently, it would seem that Article 300(4)
300 straipsnio 4 dalis, EB sutartis: „4.
Article 300(4) ECT: ‘4.
Sudarydama susitarimą ir nukrypdama nuo 2 dalies nuostatų, Taryba gali įgalioti Komisiją pritarti pakeitimams Bendrijos vardu, jeigu tame susitarime yra numatyta, kad pakeitimai priimami pagal supaprastintą procedūrą arba juos priima pagal minėtą susitarimą įsteigtas organas; suteikdama šį įgaliojimą Taryba gali numatyti tam tikras specifines sąlygas.“ yra tinkamas teisinis pagrindas, kuriuo remiantis Europos Komisijai leidžiama Bendrijos vardu derėtis dėl ir pritarti visiems būsimiems AEWA susitarimo pakeitimams.
When concluding an agreement, the Council may, by way of derogation from paragraph 2, authorise the Commission to approve modifications on behalf of the Community where the agreement provides for them to be adopted by a simplified procedure or by a body set up by the agreement; it may attach specific conditions to such authorisation’. of the EC Treaty constitutes the appropriate legal basis for authorising the European Commission to negotiate and approve, on behalf of the Community, any amendments made to the AEWA agreement in the future.
Atsižvelgdamas į šiuos svarstymus Teisės reikalų komitetas per savo posėdį 2005 m. gegužės 24 d. vienbalsiai nusprendė
In the light of these considerations, at its meeting of 24 May 2005, the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided unanimously
dėl pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos sprendimo dėl Europos bendrijos Susitarimo dėl Afrikos ir Eurazijos migruojančių vandens paukščių išsaugojimo sudarymo
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds
EB sutarties 300 straipsnio 3 dalies 1 pastraipa
Art. 300(3), subparagraph 1, TEC
Pagrindas Darbo Tvarkos taisyklėse
Basis in Rules of Procedure
51 straipsnis, 83 straipsnio 7 dalis ir 35 straipsnis
Rules 51, 83(7) and 35
Nuomonę teikiantis komitetas Paskelbimo per plenarinį posėdį data
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
BUDG JURI
BUDG 7.3..2005
7.3.2005 1.4.2005
JURI 1.4.2005
Glaudesnis bendradarbiavimas
Enhanced cooperation Date announced in plenary
Pakeistas referentas
Previous rapporteur(s)
JURI nuomonės pareiškimo data
Legal base disputed Date of JURI opinion
dėl pasiūlymo dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento, numatančio Bendrijos kodeksą dėl taisyklių, reglamentuojančių laisvą asmenų judėjimą per sienas
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders
*** Pritarimo procedūra visų Parlamento narių balsų dauguma, išskyrus EB sutarties 105, 107, 161 ir 300 straipsniuose bei ES sutarties 7 straipsnyje
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
Šiems pasiūlytiems pataisymams būtinas atitinkamų skyrių sutikimas.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................64
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................64
OPINION of the Committee ON LEGAL AFFAIRS on the proposed legal basis 68
OPINION of the Committee ON LEGAL AFFAIRS on the proposed legal basis 68
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................70
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................70
EUROPOS PARLAMENTO TESĖKŪROS REZOLIUCIJOS PROJEKTAS
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
dėl pasiūlymo dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento, numatančio Bendrijos kodeksą dėl taisyklių, reglamentuojančių laisvą asmenų judėjimą per sienas
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders
– atsižvelgdamas į Komisijos pasiūlymą Europos Parlamentui ir Tarybai KOM(2004)0391 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0391 )
– atsižvelgdamas į EB sutarties 251 straipsnio 2 dalį ir 62 straipsnio 1 dalies bei 2 dalies a punktą, pagal kurias Komisija pateikė pasiūlymą Parlamentui ( C6‑0080/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 62(1) and (2)(a) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0080/2004 ),
– atsižvelgdamas į Piliečių laisvių, teisingumo ir vidaus reikalų komiteto bei Vystymosi komiteto pranešimą ( A6‑0188/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0188/2005 ),
1. pritaria pakeistam Komisijos pasiūlymui;
Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION
PROPOSAL FOR A REGULATION
OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders code)
establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders code)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 62(1) and (2)(a) thereof,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 62(1) and (2)(a) thereof,
OJ C […], […], p. […].
OJ C […], […], p. […].
The common policy on the crossing of external borders, as provided for by Article 62(2) of the Treaty is such a measure.
The common policy on the crossing of external borders, as provided for by Article 62(2) of the Treaty is such a measure.
OJ L 230, 22.09.2000, p.
OJ L 230, 22.09.2000, p.
19. and the Common Manual.
19. and the Common Manual.
OJ C 313, 16.12.2002, p.
OJ C 313, 16.12.2002, p.
COM(2002) 233 final.
COM(2002) 233 final.
This objective was included in the “Plan for the management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union”, approved by the Council on 13 June 2002 and endorsed by the Seville European Council on 21 and 22 June 2002 and by the Thessaloniki European Council on 19 and 20 June 2003.
This objective was included in the “Plan for the management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union”, approved by the Council on 13 June 2002 and endorsed by the Seville European Council on 21 and 22 June 2002 and by the Thessaloniki European Council on 19 and 20 June 2003.
Border control should help to combat illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings and to prevent any threat to the Member States' internal security, public policy, public health and international relations.
Border control should help to combat illegal immigration and trafficking in human beings and to prevent any threat to the Member States' internal security, public policy, public health and international relations.
(6a) Border checks should be conducted in such a way as to fully respect human dignity.
(6a) Border checks should be conducted in such a way as to fully respect human dignity.
Border control should be carried out in a professional and respectful manner and be proportionate to the objectives pursued.
Border control should be carried out in a professional and respectful manner and be proportionate to the objectives pursued.