natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Komisija is trying to close EPSs negotiations by 2008, in order to avoid the negotiation of further waivers with other WTO members that will impact on AKR market access to the EU.
The Commission is trying to close EPA negotiations by 2008, in order to avoid the negotiation of further waivers with other WTO members that will impact on ACP market access to the EU.
The Understanding on Article XXIV defines a "reasonable time" as ten years and specifies that this should be exceeded "only in exceptional cases"; there is certainly scope to present the EU-AKR EPSs as exceptional cases as the level of development between the parties is so variable.
The Understanding on Article XXIV defines a "reasonable time" as ten years and specifies that this should be exceeded "only in exceptional cases"; there is certainly scope to present the EU-ACP EPAs as exceptional cases as the level of development between the parties is so variable.
A concern that has been expressed repeatedly by AKR country ministers and regional level negotiators is the need for greater resources.
A concern that has been expressed repeatedly by ACP country ministers and regional level negotiators is the need for greater resources.
The six AKR regions suffer greatly from supply-side constraints and institutional shortcomings that need to be addressed.
The six ACP regions suffer greatly from supply-side constraints and institutional shortcomings that need to be addressed.
The EU should consider providing extra EDF resources to AKR countries, firstly, to help them cope with the major institutional reforms that have been demanded of them under EPSs, and secondly to assess their development impact before the negotiations are concluded.
The EU should consider providing extra EDF resources to ACP countries, firstly, to help them cope with the major institutional reforms that have been demanded of them under EPAs, and secondly to assess their development impact before the negotiations are concluded.
Partnership is one of the main principles of the Cotonou Agreement and the EPSs, yet the Komisija has been reluctant to engage in debate on many of the issues raised by
Partnership is one of the main principles of the Cotonou Agreement and the EPAs, yet the Commission has been reluctant to engage in debate on many of the issues raised by
AKR partners, like those of the African trade ministers Meeting in Cairo last June.
ACP partners, like those of the African trade ministers Meeting in Cairo last June.
In particular, AKR countries have been keen to highlight the importance of addressing the supply-side constraints currently endured by many AKR countries which might prevent them from truly benefiting from a liberalised trade regime with the EU.
In particular, ACP countries have been keen to highlight the importance of addressing the supply-side constraints currently endured by many ACP countries which might prevent them from truly benefiting from a liberalised trade regime with the EU.
Greater financing is also needed to help AKR economies meet the increasingly demanding EU technical, sanitary and other regulatory standards.
Greater financing is also needed to help ACP economies meet the increasingly demanding EU technical, sanitary and other regulatory standards.
In addition means need to be foreseen to alleviate the social impact of the economic reforms that the EPSs will bring about.
In addition means need to be foreseen to alleviate the social impact of the economic reforms that the EPAs will bring about.
Free trade with the EU would also lead to significant revenue losses for AKR countries.
Free trade with the EU would also lead to significant revenue losses for ACP countries.
The income from import duties and levies constitutes an important element of the national budgets in AKR countries.
The income from import duties and levies constitutes an important element of the national budgets in ACP countries.
Furthermore, many AKR countries do not have the capacity in place to introduce or extend their tax systems sufficiently.
Furthermore, many ACP countries do not have the capacity in place to introduce or extend their tax systems sufficiently.
The abolishment of import tariffs may lead to cheaper supply goods for domestic production (machines for industrial production etc.); however, the EPSs negotiations cannot be concluded without a solution to compensate for the loss of AKR government revenue.
The abolishment of import tariffs may lead to cheaper supply goods for domestic production (machines for industrial production etc.); however, the EPA negotiations cannot be concluded without a solution to compensate for the loss of ACP government revenue.
In this respect it would be useful to build triggers into the EPSs negotiations, to ensure that a phase can start only when resources are available or when a certain result has been attained.
In this respect it would be useful to build triggers into the EPA negotiations, to ensure that a phase can start only when resources are available or when a certain result has been attained.
The EU should respect the demands of AKR partners and maintain the commitments undertaken at the WTO meeting in Doha, avoiding discussion on the Singapore Issues in EPSs negotiations.
The EU should respect the demands of ACP partners and maintain the commitments undertaken at the WTO meeting in Doha, avoiding discussion on the Singapore Issues in EPAs negotiations.
The inclusion of the Singapore Issues in any EPS agreement would probably serve to strengthen EU companies' rights at the expense of AKR national-level development plans.
The inclusion of the Singapore Issues in any EPA agreement would probably serve to strengthen EU companies' rights at the expense of ACP national-level development plans.
Regionalism is a core objective of both AKR countries and the EU and it is central to EPSs negotiations.
Regionalism is a core objective of both ACP countries and the EU and it is central to EPA negotiations.
EPSs should support and be based on existing regional integration initiatives and objectives.
EPAs should support and be based on existing regional integration initiatives and objectives.
However EPSs negotiations have led in some cases to the creation of new Regional Economic Communities, encompassing countries of markedly different development levels.
However EPA negotiations have led in some cases to the creation of new Regional Economic Communities, encompassing countries of markedly different development levels.
This has caused major difficulties in AKR countries, undermining the protection of strategic industries because of the urgency to align their tariffs before the end of negotiations in 2007.
This has caused major difficulties in ACP countries, undermining the protection of strategic industries because of the urgency to align their tariffs before the end of negotiations in 2007.
The regional integration efforts of the AKR countries should be given enough completion time so that they can be consolidated before being exposed to EU competition.
The regional integration efforts of the ACP countries should be given enough completion time so that they can be consolidated before being exposed to EU competition.
In practice this means that such transition periods for intra-regional development would go well beyond 2008, the proposed start of the implementation of the EPSs.
In practice this means that such transition periods for intra-regional development would go well beyond 2008, the proposed start of the implementation of the EPAs.
The new EU GSP+ system, if properly implemented, could put environmental and social standards as a top priority in trade agreements with AKR and other developing countries respecting certain international standards.
The new EU GSP+ system, if properly implemented, could put environmental and social standards as a top priority in trade agreements with ACP and other developing countries respecting certain international standards.
Moreover, AKR LDCs currently enjoy better market access to the EU under the Everything but Arms (EBA) initiative than that which is currently on offer under the EPSs.
Moreover, ACP LDCs currently enjoy better market access to the EU under the 'Everything but Arms' (EBA) initiative than that which is currently on offer under the EPAs.
There is therefore not much incentive for AKR LDCs to engage in the EPSs process.
There is therefore not much incentive for ACP LDCs to engage in the EPA process.
The market access they enjoy at present is non-reciprocal and would remain so if they choose not to involve themselves in an EPS.
The market access they enjoy at present is non-reciprocal and would remain so if they choose not to involve themselves in an EPA.
Indeed countries enjoying preferences under GSP may be better off under this regime than under reciprocal EPSs agreements.
Indeed countries enjoying preferences under GSP may be better off under this regime than under reciprocal EPAs agreements.
The Europos Komisija must address this issue if the EPSs are to go forward and achieve the developmental goals that supposedly underlie them.
The European Commission must address this issue if the EPAs are to go forward and achieve the developmental goals that supposedly underlie them.
The review of the EPS negotiations foreseen in 2006 by art.37.4 of the Cotonou Agreement should represent a major assessment of the extent to which the negotiations are indeed contributing to these goals.
The review of the EPA negotiations foreseen in 2006 by art.37.4 of the Cotonou Agreement should represent a major assessment of the extent to which the negotiations are indeed contributing to these goals.
Negotiators need to recall the Cape Town Declaration - unanimously adopted by the AKR-EU JPA in March 2002 - which called for the establishment of development benchmarks against which to assess the conduct and outcome of the AKR-EU trade negotiations.
Negotiators need to recall the Cape Town Declaration - unanimously adopted by the ACP-EU JPA in March 2002 - which called for the establishment of development benchmarks against which to assess the conduct and outcome of the ACP-EU trade negotiations.
Strong involvement of civil society, such as the consultation of AKR civil society through local trade-scrutinising task forces, is consequently needed, as well as the continued involvement of national-level Parliaments.
Strong involvement of civil society, such as the consultation of ACP civil society through local trade-scrutinising task forces, is consequently needed, as well as the continued involvement of national-level Parliaments.
Under the current timetable, EPSs negotiations are due to be concluded by December 2007 at the latest with an implementation phase of between 10 and 12 years beginning in January 2008.
Under the current timetable, EPA negotiations are due to be concluded by December 2007 at the latest with an implementation phase of between 10 and 12 years beginning in January 2008.
There are many more hurdles to overcome in the individual EPSs negotiations before this date, and it is imperative that all negotiators keep the Cotonou Agreement's primary objective of poverty eradication at the forefront of any agreements made.
There are many more hurdles to overcome in the individual EPA negotiations before this date, and it is imperative that all negotiators keep the Cotonou Agreement's primary objective of poverty eradication at the forefront of any agreements made.
In order to retain the added value in AKR economies a different system, where production is prioritised for the domestic over the export market and where producers' income is guaranteed, needs to be forged.
In order to retain the added value in ACP economies a different system, where production is prioritised for the domestic over the export market and where producers' income is guaranteed, needs to be forged.
Ekonominės partnerystės susitarimų (EPS) poveikis vystymuisi
The development impact of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs)
dėl pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, iš dalies keičiančio Reglamentą (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 2728/94, įsteigiantį Išorės veiksmų garantijų fondą
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
EUROPOS PARLAMENTO TEISĖKŪROS REZOLIUCIJOS PROJEKTAS...........................4
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................2
TEISĖS REIKALŲ KOMITETO NUOMONĖ DĖL TEISINIO PAGRINDO..........................11
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...............2
– atsižvelgdamas į Komisijos pasiūlymą Tarybai (KOM (2005)0130)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0130 )
OL C ..., 2006 1 13, p. .... ,
OJ C .., 13.1.2006, p. ... ,
– atsižvelgdamas į EB sutarties 308 straipsnį ir EAEB 203 straipsnį, pagal kuriuos Taryba pasikonsultavo su Parlamentu ( C6‑0176/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty and to Article 203 of the EAEC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0176/2005 ),
– atsižvelgdamas į Biudžeto komiteto pranešimą ( A6‑0054/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0054/2006 ),
1 nurodomoji dalis
CITATION 1
atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 181a straipsnį ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 181a thereof,
Pasiūlymo daliai, besiremiančiai Europos bendrija (pagrindinė paskolų dalis, kuriai taikomas Garantijų fondo mechanizmas), taikomas Sutarties 181a straipsnis, o ne 308 straipsnis, kaip siūlo Komisija.
The European Community part of this proposal (the substantive part of the volume of loans covered by the guarantee fund mechanism) falls under Art. 181a of the Treaty, not Art. 308 as proposed by the Commission.
Balsavimo procedūros pareikalaus kvalifikuotos daugumos Taryboje.
Voting procedures will entail qualified majority in the Council.
Tai tampa nesuderinama su pasiūlymo Euratomo dalimi, kuri reikalauja vieningumo.
This becomes incompatible with the Euratom part of the proposal, which requires unanimity.
Todėl Komisija kviečiama pateikti naują pasiūlymą, susijusį su Euratomo dalimi.
The Commission is therefore also invited to present a new proposal concerning the Euratom part.
Nors EP galios (konsultavimasis) nebus paveiktos, taip elgtis būtų teisiškai teisinga, ir kai kuriais atvejais tai taip pat galėtų reikšti skirtumą, ar pasiūlymui taikoma bendro sprendimo procedūra, ar ne, kaip atsitiko su naujausiu pranešimu dėl Stabilumo priemonės.
Although the powers of the EP will not be affected (consultation), it is legally correct to proceed in this way and. in some cases, it could also mean the difference whether a proposal falls under co-decision or not, as was the case with the recent report on the Stability Instrument.
atsižvelgdama į Europos atominės energijos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 203 straipsnį,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 203 thereof,
(4) Jei pagal 2007–2013 m. finansines perspektyvas būtų panaikintas Garantijų fondo finansavimui sukurtas rezervas, lėšos Garantijų fondui turėtų būti skiriamos iš Europos Sąjungos bendrojo biudžeto kaip privalomosios išlaidos.
(4) Should the reserve created to endow the Guarantee Fund be abolished for the Financial Perspectives 2007–2013, the funding of the Guarantee Fund should be provided for as an obligatory expenditure from the general budget of the European Union .
(4) Jei pagal 2007–2013 m. finansinę perspektyvą būtų panaikintas Garantijų fondo finansavimui sukurtas rezervas, Garantijų fondas turėtų būti finansuojamas neatsižvelgiant į aukščiausias finansinės perspektyvos ribas ir įtrauktas į rezervą.
(4) Should the reserve created to endow the Guarantee Fund be abolished for the Financial Perspectives 2007–2013, the Guarantee Fund should be financed outside the Financial Perspective ceilings and included in the reserve.
This amendment follows the recommendations on the European Parliament resolution on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ) of 8 June 2005, paragraph 46.
This amendment follows the recommendations on the European Parliament resolution on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 ( 2004/2209(INI) ) of 8 June 2005, paragraph 46.
(7) Sutartyse nenumatyta kitų galių priimti šį reglamentą, išskyrus numatytąsias EB sutarties 308 straipsnyje ir Euratomo sutarties 203 straipsnyje,
(7) The Treaties do not provide, for the adoption of this Regulation, powers, other than those in Article 308 of the EC Treaty and Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty,
1 straipsnio 4 punktas
ARTICLE 1, POINT 4
5 straipsnio 2 dalis (Reglamentas (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 2728/94)
Article 5, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94)
Švelninamuoju mechanizmu pagrįsti apskaičiavimai atliekami atskirai nuo 3 straipsnio trečioje pastraipoje ir 4 straipsnyje nurodytų apskaičiavimų.
The calculations based on this smoothing mechanism shall be made separately from the calculations referred to in Article 3, third paragraph, and in Article 4.
Tačiau pagal tuos apskaičiavimus atliekamas tik vienas pervedimas per metus.
Nevertheless, they will together result in one annual transfer.
Pagal šį mechanizmą iš Europos Sąjungos bendrojo biudžeto mokamos sumos laikomos Fondo grynuoju turtu vykdant skaičiavimus pagal 3 ir 4 straipsnius.
The amounts to be paid from the general budget of the European Union under this smoothing mechanism shall be treated as net assets of the Fund for the calculation pursuant to Articles 3 and 4.
Tačiau pagal tuos apskaičiavimus atliekamas tik vienas pervedimas per metus , aiškiai nurodant atskiras dalis .
Nevertheless, they will together result in one annual transfer , but clearly indicating the different parts.
For reasons of transparency and information to the Budgetary Authority.
.For reasons of transparency and information to the Budgetary Authority
5 straipsnio 3 dalis (Reglamentas (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 2728/94)
Article 5, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94)
Jei vienos ar kelių negrąžintų didelių paskolų atveju įvykdomi garantijose numatyti įsipareigojimai ir Fondo lėšos dėl to sumažėja iki mažesnės už 50 % planuojamos sumos, Komisija pateikia ataskaitą apie išimtines priemones, kurių gali tekti imtis Fondui papildyti.“
If, as a result of the activation of guarantees on one or more major defaults, resources in the Fund fall below 50 % of the target amount, the Commission shall submit a report on exceptional measures that might be required to replenish the Fund.”
Jei vienos ar kelių negrąžintų didelių paskolų atveju įvykdomi garantijose numatyti įsipareigojimai ir Fondo lėšos dėl to sumažėja iki mažesnės už 75 % planuojamos sumos, Komisija nedelsiant praneša biudžeto valdymo institucijai apie šios padėties priežastis ir pateikia ataskaitą apie išimtines priemones, kurių gali tekti imtis Fondui papildyti.“
If, as a result of the activation of guarantees on one or more major defaults, resources in the Fund fall below 75% of the target amount, the Commission shall immediately inform the budgetary authority as to the reasons for this situation and submit a report on exceptional measures that might be required to replenish the Fund.”
Išankstinio perspėjimo mechanizmas yra protingas, jei, sakysime, nebus grąžinta keletas didelių paskolų.
A mechanism of early-warning is prudent in case some major loans were not to be repaid.
75 % ribinis skaičius suteiktų biudžeto valdymo institucijai daugiau laiko įvertinti situaciją remiantis Komisijos pasiūlymu.
A threshold figure of 75 % would give more time for the budgetary authority to assess the situation on the basis of the Commission proposal.
2006 m.vasario 24 d.
24 February 2006
Januszui Lewandowskiui
Mr Janusz Lewandowski
Tema: nuomonė dėl pasiūlymo dėl Tarybos reglamento, iš dalies keičiančio Reglamentą (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 2728/94, įsteigiantį Išorės veiksmų garantijų fondą, teisinio pagrindo ( KOM(2005)0130 – C6‑0176/2005 – 2005/0025(CNS) )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions ( COM(2005)0130 – C6‑0176/2005 – 2005/0025(CNS) )
Dar nepaskelbta OL .
Not yet published in OJ.
Gerbiamasis pirmininke,
Dear Mr Chairman,
vadovaudamasis Darbo tvarkos taisyklių 35 straipsnio 2 dalimi, 2006 m. vasario 1 d. laišku paprašėte Teisės reikalų komiteto pateikti nuomonę dėl to, ar minėtojo Komisijos pasiūlymo teisinis pagrindas yra pagrįstas ir tinkamas.
By letter of 1 February 2006 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
2006 m. vasario 23 d. vykusio posėdžio metu komitetas apsvarstė pirmiau minėtą klausimą.
The Committee considered the above question at its meeting of 23 February 2006.
Komisija pateikė šį pasiūlymą laikydamasi EB sutarties 308 straipsnio ir Euratomo 203 straipsnio, kadangi nedidelę garantijų mechanizmo apimamos veiklos dalį sudaro ir Euratomo paskolos.
The Commission has presented this proposal under Article 308 of the EC Treaty and also under Article 203 Euratom, since a small part of the actions covered by the guarantee mechanism also consists of Euratom loans.
Jūsų komiteto pranešėjo E. Seppäneno nuomone, tinkamas šio pasiūlymo teisinis pagrindas EB vardu būtų EB sutarties 181a straipsnis („Ekonominis, finansinis ir techninis bendradarbiavimas su trečiosiomis šalimis“), todėl jis pateikė pakeitimą, kuriuo pasiūlymo teisinis pagrindas, kurį sudarė EB Sutarties 308 straipsnis, keičiamas EB Sutarties 181a straipsniu.
Your rapporteur, Mr Seppänen, is of the opinion that the correct legal basis for the EC part of the proposal would be Article 181a EC (Economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries) and has therefore presented an amendment changing the legal base from Article 308 EC to Article 181a EC.
Tačiau dėl tokio pakeitimo kiltų prieštaravimas, nes tada tas pats reglamentas Sutartyse turėtų du teisinius pagrindus, kuriems Taryboje taikoma skirtinga balsavimo tvarka: dėl EB sutarties 181a straipsnio balsuojama kvalifikuota balsų dauguma, o dėl Euratomo 203 straipsnio – vienbalsiai.
This change would however lead to a “conflictual” situation in that the same regulation would have two Treaty bases with different voting procedures in the Council, Article 181a EC requiring a qualified majority and Article 203 Euratom requiring unanimity.
Todėl Biudžeto komiteto pranešėjas ragina Komisiją pateikti atskirą pasiūlymą dėl šio pasiūlymo dalies, susijusios su Euratomu.
Consequently, the rapporteur of the Committee on Budgets invites the Commission to present a separate legal instrument for the Euratom part of the proposal.
Remiantis nusistovėjusia Teisingumo Teismo praktika, aišku, kad teisinio pagrindo negalima parinkti subjektyviai, bet jis turi būti grindžiamas objektyviais veiksniais, kuriuos galima patikrinti teismine tvarka, pvz., nagrinėjamo teisės akto tikslu ir turiniu.
It is clear from settled case-law of the Court of Justice that the choice of legal basis is not a subjective one, but "must be based on objective factors which are amenable to judicial review"
1 Byla 45/86 Komisija prieš Tarybą, 1987 m.
Case 45/86 Commission v Council [1987] ECR 1439, para.
I-2867, 17-21 punktus (Byla dėl titano dioksido), bylos C-388/01 Komisija prieš Tarybą, 2004 m.
See, e.g., Case C-300/89 Commission v Council [1991] ECR I-2867, paras 17-21 ( Titanium dioxide case), Case C-388/01 Commission v Council [2004] ECR I-4829, para.
EB sutarties 181a straipsnis buvo įterptas Nicos sutartimi siekiant reglamentuoti ekonominį, finansinį ir techninį bendradarbiavimą su trečiosiomis šalimis, kurios nėra besivystančios šalys, nes iki šiol nė viename sutarties straipsnyje nebuvo tokios nuostatos.
Article 181a of the EC Treaty was introduced by the Treaty of Nice in order to get around the problem that no treaty article covered economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries which were not developing countries.