natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sutarties 272 straipsnyje numatyta procedūra nuo TIS numatytos biudžeto procedūros nesiskiria labai daug, tik yra mažiau ribojanti.
With the introduction of the co-decision procedure by the Amsterdam Treaty (May 1999) and the new balance of legislative competences between European Parliament and Council, the problem "amounts deemed necessary" was formalised in the Joint Declaration of 1995 on the Incorporation of Financial Provisions in legislative acts.
Pavyzdžiui, Komisijos (ir Europos Parlamento) pasiūlymuose 2007–2013 m. laikotarpiu išlaidas moksliniams tyrimams siūloma padidinti 300%, pažangai – 5%, piliečių dalyvavimui – 80%.
In its conclusions, the Court confirms the independence of the legislative and budgetary procedures and at the same time strengthens the link between the two although neither of the two should impose to the other.
Jei teisėkūros institucija nusprendžia dėl padidinimo, kurį būtų sunku finansuoti neperžengiant didžiausios padidėjimo normos ribų (pvz., moksliniai tyrimai + 300% Komisijos pasiūlyme, BUSP) arba kuriam būtų sunku nustatyti išlaidų objektą (t. y. struktūriniai fondai), biudžeto institucija turi nuspręsti dėl procedūros finansuoti šiuos veiksmus pagal naują didžiausią padidėjimo normą.
The Nice Treaty, which entered into force on in February 2003, has increased the scope of co-decision in several areas (freedom, justice and security, and external actions).
Tokios programos gali būti taikomos tik paskutinius metus (arba paskutinius dvejus metus).
Over the next period, there will be additional programmes with multi-annual envelopes.
Pranešėjas mano, kad net pagal Sutarties 272 straipsnio procedūrą Parlamentas gali užtikrinti visų programų (struktūrinių fondų, konkurencingumo (Lisabonos tikslai), pilietybės, išorės veiksmų) finansavimą tiek neperžengdamas didžiausios padidėjimo normos ribų, tiek kartu su Taryba patvirtindamas naują didžiausią padidėjimą normą.
In accordance with article 26 of the Inter-institutional Agreement of 6 May 1999, the Commission presented fresh proposals for a new medium-term financial perspective in February 2004, followed by the related legislative proposals.
Programos, kurios sumos fiksuotos, nebus koreguojamos, o toms, kuriose sumos nurodomosios, finansavimas, atsižvelgiant į politinius prioritetus, gali būti padidintas arba sumažintas.
It should be recalled that most of the Community multi-annual programmes terminate at the end of 2006, which implies that 90% of the legislation with financial implications has to be renewed in the context of the new financial perspective.
· Sutarties nuostatos (272 straipsnis) Europos Parlamentui yra palankesnės nei galimybė pratęsti FP/TIS (26 TIS straipsnis).
On 16-17 June 2005, the European Council did not succeed in agreeing on a common position based on the Luxembourg presidency compromise.
· Metiniai biudžetai ir daugiametės programos vieni kitiems neprieštarauja.
The sectoral committees have started to examine the legislative proposals.
DARBO DOKUMENTAS NR.2 DĖL KOMISIJOS NAUJŲ PASIŪLYMŲ DĖL 2007–2013 M. FINANSINĖS PERSPEKTYVOS : PIRMOSIOS PASTABOS
At this stage 17 have already been adopted.
Pirmininkas J. Barroso savo mintis išdėstė ir Europos Parlamento pirmininkų sueigos susirinkime spalio 20 d.
At its meeting of 27 October, the European Council took note of the "Five proposals to relaunch negotiations".
Didžiausias Komisijos rūpestis nuo praėjusio birželio mėn. buvo Europos Tarybos nesugebėjimas pasiekti susitarimą.
- the structure of EU spending, namely an earmarking from headings 1b and 2, a Globalisation Fund and heading 2
Atsižvelgiant į Europos Parlamento birželio 8 d. balsavimą, Komisijos pradiniai 2004 m. vasario mėn. pasiūlymai atrodo nerealūs dėl turinio ir laiko.
- modernising the budget notably setting up a timetable and scope for review
ES teisės aktų su finansinėmis pasekmėmis nustoja galioti 2006 m.), ir 2007 m. biudžeto projekto (PDB) paruošimą padaryti efektyvesnį.
On 15 November, the Presidency foresees to make a new proposal including a table with figures in view of a discussion in Coreper and at the 21 November General Affairs Council.
Komisijos „mintys“ pateikiamos pagal penkias temas
Legislation in absence of a Financial Perspective
RAPID MEMO/05/386; http://europa.eu.int/rapid/ :
The EU budget has developed within a multi-annual framework since 1988.
Komisijos pasiūlymus galima vertinti kaip šiek tiek nutolusius nuo „Prodžio paketo“ ir išlaikančius realistiškesnį požiūrį.
There can be no Financial Perspective without EP's agreement.
Bendra pastaba, kad nors dauguma punktų buvo pabrėžti EP rezoliucijoje, absoliutus privalomumas pasiekti susitarimą gruodžio mėn. (net maža kaina) yra greičiausiai perdėtas.
This rate of increase may not, however, exceed the rate of growth of Community GNP for the year concerned. provides for the prolongation of the existing Financial Perspective (see below) unless it is denounced by one of the parties:
Pirmininkas J. Borrell ir R. Böge daug kartų pažymėjo, kad:
Estimation of the evolution of expenditures under art.
Laiško siekis pagerinti finansinę struktūrą lydinčius elementus atitinka Parlamento derybinę poziciją.
a. the use of this automatic mechanism over the years leads to a reduction of the NCE,
Tačiau šios nuostatos atsilieka nuo Parlamento prašymų, įskaitant nuostatas pagerinti išlaidų kokybę.
b. the structure of the current FP is not adequate to highlight the priorities identified by the Commission and shared by the Parliament (i.e. Lisbon strategy),
Daugumos delegacijų bendras požiūris buvo gana skeptiškas.
d. the starting point for the prolongation - FP for the year 2006 – is based on EU 25 while the FP for 2007 onwards will be for EU 27.
Kitas posėdis buvo numatytas lapkričio 16 d.
In respect of the procedure set down by the Treaty (art.
I. Augimo ir įdarbinimo išteklių didinimas
– by Parliament and Council that can jointly fix a new MRI to finance the budget.
The first step is to identify and ring fence the investment provided under cohesion policy for competitiveness, in particular through research and innovation, human capital, business services, major European infrastructures, improvement of energy efficiency and renewable energies.
Pilot projects and preparatory actions according to article 49 of the Financial Regulation Should the legislative authority (Council or EP and Council) include a certain amount in the legal basis, the budgetary authority should endeavour not to depart from this decision, unless there are justified reasons.
§ This contribution should increase in line with the acceleration of the Lisbon strategy.
In practical terms the respect of the multi-annual envelopes has a limited effect in the annual budget (only the last year of implementation of a programme).
Each Member State should set a target to increase the proportion of cohesion spending devoted directly to competitiveness.
In fact, the budgetary authority can adjust the share of the envelope over the period, according to the annual priorities.
§ A similar mechanism would be established in respect of rural development .
The rapporteur is fully aware of the advantages obtained by Parliament over the last years through the budgetary cooperation setup in the IIA.
The result of this earmarking would be to increase the share of spending linked to the new Lisbon strategy to at least a third of the EU budget."
This margin could be used in total (3.6% increase per year) for all programmes or it could be used on a more selective basis, according to Parliament's priorities.
Europos Parlamento derybinė pozicija
An agreement between the Parliament and Council to fix a new MRI is necessary to finance such activities.
Buvo pabrėžta Lisabonos strategija ir ypač tyrimai, naujovės ir infrastruktūra.
· Annual budgets and multi-annual programmes are not contradictory.
60 proc. viso voko, skirto Sanglaudos politikos išlaidų kategorijai (1b), būtų rezervuota konkurencingumo veiksmams ir daugiausia tyrimams, taip pat infrastruktūrai, keliams ir oro uostams.
· In the absence of agreement on the FP/IIA, Parliament and Council, in their double responsibility as legislative and budgetary authorities, could find ad hoc solutions to finance some specific programmes and to "Ring Fence" major policies.
Šiuo metu apie 50 proc. lėšų jau skirta struktūriniams veiksmams, susijusiems su konkurencija.
Since last June, the failure of the European Council to reach an agreement has been a major concern within the Commission.
Ši idėja sutampa su EP išreikšta mintimi stiprinti paramą Lisabonos strategijai.
The Commission's proposals could be interpreted as taking some distance from the "Prodi package" with a more realistic approach.
Pranešėjas pabrėžia poreikį išplėsti EIB galimybes skatinti augimą ir konkurencingumą, kaip tai aiškiai pabrėžiama EP derybinėje pozicijoje (50 straipsnio paskutinė pastraipa).
As a general comment even if most of the points have been stressed in the EP resolution, the insistence on the absolute necessity to reach an agreement in December (even at low cost) is probably overstated.
Tačiau pasiūlymas palieka tuos pačius klausimus: ar tai galima laikyti esminiu pasikeitimu, ar tai tėra „kosmetinė“ iniciatyva?
- no Financial Perspective/Inter-institutional Agreement will be in place without EP agreement, and that
Ar ši priemonė bus privaloma?
- no agreement on figures will occur without an agreement on the IIA.
Ar bus priemonė, kuria bus galima sustabdyti paramą valstybėms narėms, kurios nesilaikys šio tikslo?
However, those ideas are trailing behind Parliament's requests, including those to improve the quality of the expenditure.
Kaip bus garantuojamas ekonominis šios priemonės efektyvumas?
At its meeting of 7 November, the General Affairs Council examined President Barroso's 'ideas'.
Tokia pat priemonė turi būti taikoma ir kaimo plėtrai su tiksliniu 30 proc. paskyrimu.
The general approach of most delegations was rather sceptical.
Tai neprieštarautų EP derybinei pozicijai, kuri, nors ir be paskyrimo, yra palanki kaimo plėtrai (žr.
Another meeting was foreseen for 16 November.
Globalizavimo iššūkio priėmimas: smūgių sušvelninimas
the full text of the five "ideas" is reproduced in this document and can be found under RAPID MEMO/05/386 from 20 October 2005; http://europa.eu.int/rapid/
It would provide a swift answer to one-off, clearly defined problems resulting from restructuring.
A new approach is needed to the way these policies boost growth.
No new bureaucracy is needed: existing instruments and networks could be used, but access to extra resources is necessary.
§ A specific earmarking of funds from cohesion spending would reinforce the drive for growth and jobs.
The Fund would cover training, relocation of workers, outplacement: the costs of action to help find a new job.
The first step is to identify and ring fence the investment provided under cohesion policy for competitiveness, in particular through research and innovation, human capital, business services, major European infrastructures, improvement of energy efficiency and renewable energies.
Clear criteria on the nature of the crisis and the scale of the eligible costs will be set out.
§ This contribution should increase in line with the acceleration of the Lisbon strategy.
Not all restructuring would qualify: this would be a crisis mechanism to be used only to address significant economic and social shocks related to globalisation.
Each Member State should set a target to increase the proportion of cohesion spending devoted directly to competitiveness.
It should only intervene if a threshold is reached, defined in terms of the proportion of workers hit by redundancy in the sector and the region concerned, and the local jobless rate.
This target should be set by Member States above an average minimum of 60% of total cohesion spending.
To be cost-effective, this instrument will be delivered through existing Structural Fund instruments and using the same rules.
§ In the run-up to the Spring European Council each year, Member States would report on this spending to the Council and the European Parliament, as an integral part of the reporting mechanisms to comply with the agreed objectives for growth and jobs.
This resource would lie outside the financial framework (as already the case for the EU Solidarity Fund) and would be mobilised only when needed.
§ A similar mechanism would be established in respect of rural development .
Needless to say, the decision on whether to use this option would rest with Parliament and Council."
The result of this earmarking would be to increase the share of spending linked to the new Lisbon strategy to at least a third of the EU budget."
Europos Parlamento derybinė pozicija
European Parliament's negotiating position
Europos Parlamento rezoliucijoje (žr.
Paragraph 15, 21 and 52 of the Böge resolution read as follows:
46 straipsnį priede) siekiant apimti įvairius poreikius, numatyti skirtingi lankstumo tipai (konkurencingumo rezervas, sanglaudos rezervas, skubios pagalbos rezervas, solidarumo rezervas, paskolų garantijos rezervas ir lankstumo rezervas).
15. [...] underlines the importance of cohesion policy in achieving the Lisbon goals and helping to bridge the gap between the different territories of the European Union; insists that all resources allocated to cohesion policy should be spent for this purpose ;
Pranešėjo pastabos
Rapporteur's Comments
Naujas Komisijos pasiūlymas keičia Augimo derinimo fondą, kuris buvo finansuojamas iš nepanaudotų asignavimų ir suteikė naują apimtį naujai priemonei.
The Lisbon Strategy has been emphasised and mainly research, innovation and infrastructures.
Pranešėjas gali pritarti Komisijos iškeltam tikslui remti lankstumo priemonę, nors jis nepritaria ribojimui iki vienos išlaidų kategorijos (1b).
An earmarking of 60% of the overall envelope dedicated to the Cohesion Policy (Heading 1b) would be reserved for competitiveness actions and mainly research but also infrastructure, motorways and airports.
Europos Parlamentas, be abejo, nepritars Tarpinstituciniam susitarimui, kuriame lankstumo priemonė ribojama iki vienos išlaidų kategorijos, ypač atsižvelgdamas į griežtesnę finansinę struktūrą.
It is not clear whether all the instruments of the new cohesion policy: convergence, regional competitiveness and employment, European territorial cooperation and the Cohesion Fund, would be concerned or only some of them.
Dabartinių žemės ūkio reformų konsolidavimas
Meeting the challenge of globalisation: a shock absorber
Komisijos pasiūlymas
Commission Proposal
This agreement should be fully respected.
The Fund would cover training, relocation of workers, outplacement: the costs of action to help find a new job.
One of the key reforms was to introduce more dynamism into agricultural spending by shifting funds from direct aids for farmers to rural development.
Clear criteria on the nature of the crisis and the scale of the eligible costs will be set out.
Increasing the pace of these shifts by 1 per cent a year from 2009 would release extra funds to have a direct impact on growth and jobs in rural communities.
Not all restructuring would qualify: this would be a crisis mechanism to be used only to address significant economic and social shocks related to globalisation.
It would also boost the funding for the Union’s innovative conservation network, NATURA 2000."
Needless to say, the decision on whether to use this option would rest with Parliament and Council."
EP derybinė pozicija labai aiškiai susijusi su 2002 m. susitarimu.
The European Parliament's resolution (see par.
22 straipsnyje sakoma:
45 in Annex).
Tačiau jis mano, kad, kaip ir pabrėžiama EP derybinėje pozicijoje, be papildomo bendro finansavimo, Komisijos pasiūlymas reikštų ES ūkininkų pajamų sumažinimą.
The rapporteur can share the objective expressed by the Commission to provide for a flexibility mechanism, although he disagrees with the limitation to one heading (1b).
Pasirodo, ši priemonė yra slaptas 2002 m. susitarimo išsižadėjimo metodas.
The European Parliament will certainly not accept an Inter-institutional Agreement with a flexibility mechanism reduced to one heading, especially if combined with a restrictive financial framework.
Biudžeto modernizavimas: gairės peržiūrai
Consolidating the current agricultural reforms
But a more over-arching review is also needed.
This agreement should be fully respected.
The Union should commit itself to carrying out a comprehensive review of all aspects of the organisation of the EU budget – expenditure, revenue and structure – with a view to ensuring that the budget is equipped to respond to the challenges of the future.
One of the key reforms was to introduce more dynamism into agricultural spending by shifting funds from direct aids for farmers to rural development.
The review would be launched by a White Paper on modernisation of spending and revenue to be put forward by the Commission early in 2009."
Increasing the pace of these shifts by 1 per cent a year from 2009 would release extra funds to have a direct impact on growth and jobs in rural communities.
Šiuo periodu yra numatomos kelios žemės ūkio ir Lisabonos strategijos peržiūros.
The EP negotiating position is also very clear concerning the respect of the 2002 agreement.
Komisija mano, kad visuotinė peržiūra turėtų vykti dviem etapais nedalyvaujant valstybėms narėms:
The rapporteur agrees on the fact that the Lisbon strategy should not be limited to heading 1a and 1b.
2009 pradžioje: Baltosios knygos pristatymas ir toliau diskusijos institucijose (EP ir Taryboje);
The review would be launched by a White Paper on modernisation of spending and revenue to be put forward by the Commission early in 2009."
Pranešėjas pabrėžia, kad pasiūlymas, kuris leistų naujai Komisijai siūlyti kai kuriuos Baltosios knygos pakeitimus ir Europos Parlamentui suteiktų teisę dalyvauti sprendžiant dabartinę finansinę perspektyvą, neturėtų jokios įtakos finansinei perspektyvai.
The rapporteur underlines that such a proposal which would allow the new Commission to propose some adjustments in the White Paper and the newly elected Parliament to have a say on the current Financial Perspective would have no effect on the Financial Perspective.
Siūloma peržiūra yra neveiksminga priemonė, jei reikėtų perorientuoti ar priderinti finansinę perspektyvą.
The proposed review is an ineffective tool to be able to re-orient or adjust the FP if necessary.
EP teigiamiau vertintų tikrą peržiūrėjimo sąlygą ar trumpesnį periodą.
EP would prefer a genuine revision clause or a shorter period.
Kartu šis pasiūlymas sumažins finansinės perspektyvos patikimumą po 2010 m.
At the same time this proposal will reduce the credibility of the Financial Perspective after 2010.
V. Demokratinio atidumo ir darnos mūsų išoriniuose veiksmuose didinimas
V. Increasing democratic scrutiny and coherence of our external action
Europos Parlamento pozicija dėl EPF palaiko EPF įtraukimą į bendrą biudžetą, o ne žalos darymą kitoms (įskaitant naujas) politikoms.
Concerning EDF, the European Parliament's position is in favour of 'budgetisation' but not to the detriment of other (including new) policies.
Pranešėjas dažnai minėjo, kad ryšys tarp abiejų šių aspektų turi būti stiprus derybų punktas.
The rapporteur has often mentioned that the link between the two should be a strong point for the negotiations.
Aiškiai parodomas Tarybos paskutinio kompromiso asignavimų trūkumas.
The shortage of appropriations of the Council's last compromise is put in evidence.
EPF turėtų būti įtrauktas į bendrą biudžetą: Tarpinstituciniame susitarime bus pasiūlyta kai kurių priemonių, suteikiančių daugiau galių (kontrolės) EP dėl įgyvendinimo.
The EDF should be budgetised: some instruments giving more power (control) to the EP on implementation will be proposed for the Inter-institutional Agreement.
Parlamentas pabrėžė, kad, neįsigaliojus Konstitucijai, kuri išplėstų Europos Parlamento galias šioje srityje, išorinių veiksmų priemonių skaičiaus sumažinimas nuo 38 iki 4 yra nepriimtinas.
Parliament has emphasised that the reduction of the number of instruments for external actions from 38 to 4 combined with the non-entry into force of the Constitution, which would extend EP's powers in this area, is not acceptable.
Pranešėjas dažnai minėjo tam tikros atšaukimo sąlygos poreikį ir poreikį Tarpinstituciniame susitarime parengti naują išorinių priemonių, kurios priimtinos Europos Parlamentui, pristatymą.
The rapporteur has often raised the need for a sort of call-back clause and an Inter-institutional Agreement to make the new presentation of external instruments acceptable for EP.
Derybinė pozicija galėtų būti tokia: „daugiau pinigų, daugiau galių“.
The negotiating position could be: 'more money, more power'.
Komisijos pasiūlymus galima vertinti kaip teigiamą žingsnį link Europos Parlamento derybinės pozicijos dėl tam tikro aspektų skaičiaus, ypač dėl lankstumo poreikio, dėl Europos Parlamento teisių dėl išorinių programų peržiūrėjimo ir užtikrinimo, nors šiuo metu Europos Parlamentas jų vis dar nevykdo.
The Commission proposals could be considered as a positive move towards the European Parliament's negotiating position on a limitative number of aspects, notably, the need for flexibility, for revision and for ensuring EP's rights over external programmes, although they still trail behind that of the EP.
Jie neatsižvelgia nei į skirtingus lankstumo rezervus, skirtus nenumatytiems poreikiams padengti, nei į kokybines Europos Parlamento pasiūlytas sąlygas (žr.
They are not taking into account the different flexibility reserves for covering unforeseen needs nor of the qualitative conditions proposed by Parliament (par.
46 ir 50 straipsnius priede), pvz., finansinį reglamentą, administracinės naštos sumažinimą, valstybių narių sertifikavimą, naujų finansavimo ir bendro finansavimo priemonių supaprastinamą.
46 and 50, see annex) such as the Financial Regulation, simplification of administrative burden, certification by Member States, simplification of the new instruments of financing and co-financing.
Pranešėjas primena, kad šie elementai yra nediskutuotina bendro susitarimo dėl finansinės perspektyvos / Tarpinstitucinio susitarimo dalis.
The rapporteur recalls that these elements are a non-negotiable part of the overall agreement on the Financial Perspective/Inter-institutional Agreement.
Pranešėjas apgailestauja, kad iki šiol nebuvo įmanoma pradėti derybų dėl TIS skaičių ir nuostatų, ir tai tikrai nepalengvins pasiekti susitarimą su Europos Parlamentu.
The rapporteur regrets that until now it has been impossible to open the negotiations on figures and the provisions of the IIA which will certainly not facilitate the agreement with the European Parliament.
Tiek Komisija, tiek Taryba turi atkreipti dėmesį, kad, nepasiekus susitarimo su Europos Parlamentu, nebus pasiektas susitarimas ir dėl finansinės perspektyvos / Tarpinstitucinio susitarimo ir kad Europos Parlamento pritarimas TIS, kuris turėtų apimti ir kokybinius elementus, bus sąlyginis.
Both the Commission and the Council should be aware that there can be no agreement on the next FP/IIA without agreement with the European Parliament, and that EP agreement will be conditional on its agreement on the IIA, which should take on board qualitative elements as well.
Pranešėjas jau minėjo, kad Komisija, siekdama palengvinti derybas, galėtų pateikti peržiūrėtą TIS versiją.
The rapporteur already mentioned that the Commission could propose a revised version of the IIA to facilitate the negotiations.
DARBO DOKUMENTAS NR.4 DĖL PIRMOSIOS REAKCIJOS Į PAKEISTĄ 2006 M. VASARIO 1 D. KOMISIJOS PASIŪLYMO DĖL TARPINSTITUCINIO SUSITARIMO VARIANTĄ
WORKING DOCUMENT N° 4: ON FIRST REACTION TO THE REVISED VERSION OF THE INTERINSTITUTIONAL AGREEMENT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION ON 1 FEBRUARY 2006
Europos Parlamentui savo rezoliucija, dėl kurios buvo balsuojama 2005 m. gruodžio 1 d., pateikus prašymą, Komisija 2006 m. vasario 1 d. priėmė pakeistą Tarpinstitucinio susitarimo variantą.
Following the request made by the European Parliament in its resolution voted on 1 December 2005, the Commission has adopted a revised version of the Interinstitutional Agreement on 1 February 2006.