natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tol, kol kompensacija už tokios priežiūros neviršija paciento valstybės narės draudimo ligos atveju sistemoje nustatyto draudimo dydžio, reikalavimo dėl išankstinio leidimo panaikinimas neturėtų pažeisti socialinės apsaugos sistemos finansinės pusiausvyros.
In so far as the reimbursement of such care remains within the limits of the cover guaranteed by the sickness insurance scheme of the Member State of affiliation, abolition of the prior authorisation requirement is not likely seriously to disrupt the financial equilibrium of social security systems.
Teisingumo Teismas nuolatos buvo tos nuomonės, kad sąlygos, pagal kurias valstybės narės teikia priežiūros ne ligoninėje paslaugas jų pačių teritorijoje, taip pat taikomos ir tuo atveju, kai jos teikiamos ne valstybėje narėje, kurioje gyvena pacientas, jeigu tos sąlygos neprieštarauja Bendrijos teisei.
As the Court of Justice has consistently held, the conditions under which Member States grant non-hospital care on their own territory remain applicable in the case of care provided in a Member State other than that of affiliation in so far as those conditions are compatible with Community law.
Be to, leidimų suteikimo sąlygų ir su tuo susijusių procedūrų požiūriu leidimų prisiimti išlaidas už sveikatos priežiūrą kitoje valstybėje narėje nuostatai turi atitikti šią direktyvą.
By the same token, authorisation schemes for the assumption of costs of care in another Member State must comply with this Directive as regards the conditions for granting authorisation and the related procedures.
(55) Apie laisvą paslaugų judėjimą Teisingumo Teismas nuolatos buvo tos nuomonės, jog išankstinio leidimo, reikalingo tam, kad būtų kompensuotos išlaidos už kitoje valstybės narėje suteiktas sveikatos priežiūros paslaugas, sistema reikalinga tam, kad būtų galima planuoti ligoninių infrastruktūrų skaičių, jų geografinį paskirstymą, organizavimo būdą, joms suteikiamą įrangą ir netgi medicinos paslaugų, kurias jos gali teikti, pobūdį.
(55) As the Court of Justice has consistently held with regard to the free movement of services, a system of prior authorisation for the reimbursement of hospital care provided in another Member State appears justified by the need to plan the number of hospital infrastructures, their geographical distribution, the mode of their organisation, the equipment with which they are provided and even the nature of the medical services which they are able to offer.
Tokio planavimo tikslas yra užtikrinti, kad kiekvienoje valstybėje narėje būtų užtektinai įvairaus pobūdžio ir aukštos kokybės paslaugas teikiančių ligoninių, į kurias būtų galima kreiptis nuolatos siekiant užtikrinti veiksmingą išlaidų valdymą ir kiek įmanoma daugiau išvengti netikslingo finansinių, techninių ir žmogiškųjų išteklių naudojimo.
The aims of such planning are to ensure, within each Member State, sufficient permanent access to a balanced range of quality hospital care, to secure efficient cost management and, so far as is possible, to avoid wastage of financial, technical or human resources.
Pagal Teisingumo Teismo precedentų teisę, sveikatos priežiūros ligoninėje sąvoka turi būti objektyviai apibrėžta, o išankstinių leidimų sistema turi būti proporcinga siekiamiems bendro intereso tikslams.
In accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice, the concept of hospital care must be objectively defined and a system of prior authorisation must be proportionate to the general interest objective pursued.
Consequential to amendments (to Recitals 14,53,54,55,56,57 and to Articles 2.2, 4(10), 17(18), 23) which aim at removing health services from the scope of this legislation.
Consequential to amendments (to Recitals 14, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 and to Articles 2.2, 4(10), 17(18), 23) which aim at removing health services from the scope of this legislation.
(56) Tarybos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 1408/71 22 straipsnyje nurodomos aplinkybės, kuriomis kompetentingos nacionalinės institucijos negali atsisakyti išduoti leidimą, kurio siekiama remiantis šio reglamento nuostatomis.
(56) Article 22 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 specifies the circumstances in which the competent national institution may not refuse an authorisation sought on the basis of that provision.
Valstybės narės negali atsisakyti išduoti leidimą tais atvejais, kai kalbama apie jų teritorijoje atliekamą gydymą ligoninėje, kuris kompensuojamas pagal tos šalies socialinio draudimo sistemą, o toks pats arba vienodai efektyvus gydymas negali būti laiku suteiktas jų teritorijoje sąlygomis, numatytomis jų socialinio draudimo sistemoje.
Member States may not refuse authorisation in cases where the hospital care in question, when provided in their territory, is covered by their social security system, and treatment which is identical or equally effective cannot be obtained in time in their territory under the conditions laid down by their social security system.
Teisingumo Teismas nuolat laikėsi nuomonės, kad su leistinu atidėliojimu susijusi sąlyga turi būti apsvarstyta atsižvelgiant į visas kiekvieno atvejo aplinkybes, priimant domėn ne tik paciento sveikatos būklę tuo metu, kai prašoma suteikti pagalbą, bet ir sveikatos būklės istoriją bei galimą jo ligos raidą.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that the condition relating to acceptable delay must be considered together with all the circumstances of each case, taking due account not only of the medical condition of the patient at the time when authorisation is requested, but also his medical history and the probable evolution of his illness.
Valstybės narės socialinio draudimo sistemos prisiimamos išlaidos kitos valstybės narės teritorijoje suteiktų gydymo paslaugų atveju negali būti mažesnės už gimtosios šalies teritorijoje socialinio draudimo sistemos kompensuojamas išlaidas.
(57) The assumption of costs, by the social security systems of the Member States, in respect of health care provided in another Member State must not be lower than that provided for by their own social security system for health care provided in their territory.
Kaip Teisingumo Teismas yra ne kartą nurodęs, dėl laisvo paslaugų judėjimo, nesant leidimo, kompensacija už sveikatos priežiūrą ne ligoninėje, atsižvelgiant į paciento valstybės narės tarifus, neturėtų didelio poveikio jos socialinės apsaugos sistemos finansavimui.
As the Court has consistently pointed out with regard to the free movement of services, in the absence of authorisation, the reimbursement of non-hospital care in accordance with the scales of the Member State of affiliation would not have a significant effect on the financing of its social security system.
Tais atvejais, kai pagal Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 1408/71 22 straipsnį suteikiamas leidimas, sąnaudos prisiimamos pagal valstybės narės, kurioje suteikiama priežiūra, tarifus.
In cases where authorisation has been granted, in the framework of Article 22 of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, the assumption of costs is made in accordance with the rates applicable in the Member State in which the health care is provided.
Tačiau jei kompensuojama suma yra mažesnė už tą, kurią turėtų sumokėti pacientas, jei jis būtų gydomas savo valstybėje narėje, pastaroji turi prisiimti išlaidų, kurias būtų reikėję sumokėti, likutį.
However, if the level of coverage is lower than that to which the patient would have been entitled if he had received the same care in the Member State of affiliation, the latter must assume the remaining costs up to the level which would have applied.
(64) Reglamentuojamų profesijų komercinių ryšių draudimus būtina panaikinti ne atšaukiant draudimus, susijusius su komerciniu ryšiu turiniu, bet panaikinant tuos draudimus, kurie tam tikrai profesijai bendrai draudžia vieną ar kelis komercinių ryšių būdus, pavyzdžiui, draudžia bet kokio pobūdžio reklamą vienoje ar keliose žiniasklaidos priemonėse.
(64) It is necessary to put an end to the total prohibitions of commercial communications by the regulated professions, not by removing bans on the content of a commercial communication but rather those which, in a general way and for a given profession, forbid one or more forms of commercial communication, such as a ban on all advertising in one or more given media.
Kalbant apie komercinių ryšių turinį ir būdus, būtina skatinti specialistus Bendrijos lygmeniu sudaryti Bendrijos teisę atitinkančius elgesio kodeksus.
As regards the content and methods of commercial communication, it is necessary to encourage professionals to draw up, in accordance with Community law, codes of conduct at Community level.
The regulation of commercial communications by certain professions has long been considered necessary by some Member States as contributing to the protection of the consumer as well as to the integrity and dignity of the professions themselves.
The regulation of commercial communications by certain professions has long been considered necessary by some Member States as contributing to the protection of the consumer as well as to the integrity and dignity of the professions themselves.
The extent to which this is the case in any given Member State will depend on a number of factors including aspects of national culture and tradition.
The extent to which this is the case in any given Member State will depend on a number of factors including aspects of national culture and tradition.
It is inappropriate for the Commission to attempt to establish such a broad interpretation of its responsibility to further the internal market that it begins to interfere in matters which are rightly in the exclusive competence of the Member States.
It is inappropriate for the Commission to attempt to establish such a broad interpretation of its responsibility to further the internal market that it begins to interfere in matters which are rightly in the exclusive competence of the Member States.
68 konstatuojamoji dalis
Recital 68
(68) Ši direktyva nepažeidžia teisinių ar kitų iniciatyvų vartotojų apsaugos srityje.
(68) This Directive is without prejudice to any legislative or other initiatives in the field of consumer protection.
(68) Ši direktyva nepažeidžia teisėkūros ar kitokių iniciatyvų vartotojų apsaugos, aplinkos apsaugos, darbininkų sveikatos ir saugumo, visuomenės sveikatos ir pacientų judumo srityse.
(68) This Directive is without prejudice to any legislative or other initiatives in the fields of consumer protection, environmental protection, workers’ health and safety, public health and patient mobility.
As in the case of consumer protection, it is of overriding importance that the furtherance of the single market for services not be pursued at the expense of these considerations.
As in the case of consumer protection, it is of overriding importance that the furtherance of the single market for services not be pursued at the expense of these considerations.
Improvement of patient mobility is a high priority.
Improvement of patient mobility is a high priority.
Therefore, specific legislation should be adopted in order to facilitate and to improve the free movement of patients in the EU.
Therefore, specific legislation should be adopted in order to facilitate and to improve the free movement of patients in the EU.
72 konstatuojamoji dalis
Recital 72
(72) Šioje direktyvoje atsižvelgiama į pagrindines teisės bei stebimi principai, kurie buvo pripažinti Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartijoje, ypač jos 8, 15, 21, ir 47 straipsniuose.
(72) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles which are recognised notably in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, in Articles 8, 15, 21 and 47 thereof.
(72) Šioje direktyvoje atsižvelgiama į pagrindines teisės bei stebimi principai, kurie buvo pripažinti Europos Sąjungos pagrindinių teisių chartijoje, ypač jos 8, 15, 21, 34–38 ir 47 straipsniuose.
(72) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles which are recognised notably in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, in Articles 8, 15, 21 , 34 to 38 and 47 thereof.
Šioje direktyvoje nustatytos bendros nuostatos, kurios padeda paslaugų teikėjams naudotis įsisteigimo laisve ir laisvų paslaugų judėjimu.
This Directive establishes general provisions facilitating exercise of the freedom of establishment for service providers and the free movement of services.
Tokiu būdu siekiama padėti įgyvendinti prie Sutarties 2 straipsnyje išdėstytus uždavinius, taip pat prie ekonominės veiklos, lemiančios aukštą užimtumą ir socialinę apsaugą, darnaus vystymo bei aukšto lygio aplinkos apsaugos ir kokybės gerinimo poreikį.
In so doing it seeks to contribute to the fulfilment of the tasks laid down in Article 2 of the Treaty, i ncluding the sustainable development of economic activities leading to a high level of employment and of social protection and respecting the need for a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment.
Šia direktyva valstybės narės nėra įpareigojamos liberalizuoti visuotinės svarbos paslaugas arba privatizuoti tokias paslaugas teikiančias viešąsias įstaigas.
It does not require Member States to liberalise services of public interest or privatise public establishments which offer such services.
It is important that in stating the objectives of what is primarily a measure to ensure the free movement of services, the Directive includes a reminder of the broader goals of the European Community, goals which cannot be subordinated one to another, for example by prejudicing environmental, public health or social protection through the introduction of liberalising measures which in some circumstances may be disproportionate.
It is important that in stating the objectives of what is primarily a measure to ensure the free movement of services, the Directive includes a reminder of the broader goals of the European Community, goals which cannot be subordinated one to another, for example by prejudicing environmental, public health or social protection through the introduction of liberalising measures which in some circumstances may be disproportionate.
It must be made clear that the Directive does not compel Member States to liberalise services of public interest or to privatise public establishments offering such services or require them to abolish existing monopolies, including lotteries.
It must be made clear that the Directive does not compel Member States to liberalise services of public interest or to privatise public establishments offering such services or require them to abolish existing monopolies, including lotteries.
Monopolies curb the urge to gamble, on the one hand, and, on the other, bring in substantial revenue for the common good.
Monopolies curb the urge to gamble, on the one hand, and, on the other, bring in substantial revenue for the common good.
Clarification must be provided in the body of the Directive.
Clarification must be provided in the body of the Directive.
ca) bendroms ekonominės svarbos paslaugoms, kurioms valstybė narė arba Bendrija taiko specifinius viešųjų paslaugų įpareigojimus;
(ca) services of general economic interest which the responsible Member State or the Community subjects to specific public service obligations;
Article III-6 of the Constitutional Treaty states that “…the Union and the Member States… shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions, in particular economic and financial, which enable them to fulfil their missions.
Article III-6 of the Constitutional Treaty states that “…the Union and the Member States… shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions, in particular economic and financial, which enable them to fulfil their missions.
European laws shall define these principles and conditions without prejudice to the competence of Member States, in compliance with the Constitution, to provide, to commission and to fund such services.”
European laws shall define these principles and conditions without prejudice to the competence of Member States, in compliance with the Constitution, to provide, to commission and to fund such services.”
Failure to exclude services of general interest from the provisions of this Directive would constitute such a prejudice.
Failure to exclude services of general interest from the provisions of this Directive would constitute such a prejudice.
cb) visuotinės svarbos socialinėms paslaugoms, kurioms valstybė narė arba Bendrija taip pat taiko specifinius viešųjų paslaugų įpareigojimus, ir prie kurių priskiriamos nuolatinės priežiūros paslaugos asmenims, kurie dėl su amžiumi susijusių arba dėl kitų negalavimų, arba todėl, kad yra vaikai, negali gyventi savarankiškai, o taip pat ir kitos paslaugos;
(cb) social services of general interest which the responsible Member State or the Community subjects to specific public service obligations including, but not limited to, residential care services for persons who, through age-related or other infirmity, or because they are children, are incapable of leading fully independent lives;
The White Paper on Services of General Interest [COM (2004)374] states that “Social services of general interest have a specific role to play as an integral part of the European to play as an integral part of the European model of society.
The White Paper on Services of General Interest [COM (2004)374] states that “Social services of general interest have a specific role to play as an integral part of the European to play as an integral part of the European model of society.
Based on the principle of solidarity, social services of general interest are people-centred and ensure that citizens can effectively enjoy their fundamental rights and a high level of social protection, and they strengthen social and territorial cohesion.”
Based on the principle of solidarity, social services of general interest are people-centred and ensure that citizens can effectively enjoy their fundamental rights and a high level of social protection, and they strengthen social and territorial cohesion.”
The inclusion of such services in the provisions of this Directive would prejudice this role.
The inclusion of such services in the provisions of this Directive would prejudice this role.
2 straipsnio 2 dalies (c c) punktas (naujas)
Article 2, paragraph 2, point (c c) (new)
cc) sveikatos paslaugos;
(cc) health services;
2 straipsnio 2 dalies (c d) punktas (naujas)
Article 2, paragraph 2, point (c d) (new)
cd) vandens tiekimo paslaugoms;
(cd) water distribution services;
This directive must not threaten the principle that the management of water distribution services must remain within the public sector.
This directive must not threaten the principle that the management of water distribution services must remain within the public sector.
In particular, Articles 9 to 15, concerning the authorisation procedures, need to be accompanied by specific measures for services of general interest provided by public institutions .
In particular, Articles 9 to 15, concerning the authorisation procedures, need to be accompanied by specific measures for services of general interest provided by public institutions .
ce) paslaugoms, kurios gali kelti pavojų aplinkai arba kurios gali pakenkti visuomenės sveikatai ir kurios dėl to turi būti atidžiai vykdomos bei kruopščiai prižiūrimos;
(ce) services which may involve environmental hazard or risks potentially prejudicial to public health, and which therefore require careful execution and close supervision;
Where public health is involved, a Member State should not be expected to abdicate its responsibilities in this way.
Where public health is involved, a Member State should not be expected to abdicate its responsibilities in this way.
2 straipsnio 2 dalies cf punktas (naujas)
Article 2, paragraph 2, point (c f) (new)
cf) švietimo paslaugoms, kurių visas arba dalį išlaidų apmoka arba dengia valstybė, arba kita valstybės narės, kurioje šios paslaugos yra teikiamos, valstybinė valdžios institucija.
(cf) educational services the whole or part of the cost of which is paid or refundable by the state or other public authority of the Member State in which the service is provided.
Education is the foundation of national culture and is thus, with certain careful and useful exceptions, generally left to the competence of the Member States.
Education is the foundation of national culture and is thus, with certain careful and useful exceptions, generally left to the competence of the Member States.
Funding by public authority is a clear recognition of the socially useful function of an educational service and the addition of this criteria is intended to exclude commercial services which, though they have an educational content, are not recognised as worthy of such public support – e.g. private language schools or IT training services aimed at the private sector.
Funding by public authority is a clear recognition of the socially useful function of an educational service and the addition of this criteria is intended to exclude commercial services which, though they have an educational content, are not recognised as worthy of such public support – e.g. private language schools or IT training services aimed at the private sector.
Šios direktyvos taikymas netrukdo taikyti kitų Bendrijos teisės aktų nuostatų, reglamentuojančių joje minimas paslaugas.
Application of this Directive shall not prevent the application of provisions of other Community instruments as regards the services governed by those provisions .
Galioja ši direktyva, jei kitais Bendrijos teisės aktais, reglamentuojančiais joje minimas paslaugas, nenurodoma kitaip .
This Directive shall apply unless otherwise provided by other Community instruments as regards the services governed by those provisions.
The provisions of the services Directive should not apply where there are requirements under Community instruments concerning the establishment and provision of environmental services (e.g. the EMAS Regulation, waste framework directive).
The provisions of the services Directive should not apply where there are requirements under Community instruments concerning the establishment and provision of environmental services (e.g. the EMAS Regulation, waste framework directive).
(10) „ligoninės priežiūra“ laikoma medicininė priežiūra, kuri gali būti suteikta tik turint medicinos infrastruktūrą ir kuri paprastai reikalauja ten gydomo asmens priėmimo į stacionarą, o šios infrastruktūros pavadinimas, organizavimas ir finansavimas tokią priežiūrą klasifikuojant kaip ligoninės priežiūrą, neturi įtakos;
(10) “hospital care” means medical care which can be provided only within a medical infrastructure and which normally requires the accommodation therein of the person receiving the care, the name, organisation and financing of that infrastructure being irrelevant for the purposes of classifying such care as hospital care;
4 straipsnio 13 a punktas (naujas)
Article 4, point 13 a (new)
(13a) „sveikatos apsaugos sistemai priklausančios profesijos atstovas“ reiškia: profesijos atstovas, kuris teikia paslaugas diagnozuojant ir gydant ligas, kaip pvz. medicinos, slaugos, bei farmacines paslaugos;
(13a) 'member of a regulated health profession' means a member of a regulated profession exercising an activity consisting of providing services for the diagnosis or treatment of illnesses, such as medical, paramedical and pharmaceutical services;
2 dalis negali būti taikoma dokumentams, minimiems Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos ../../EB 46 straipsnyje , bei Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos ../../EB 45 straipsnio 3 dalyje .
Paragraph 2 shall not apply to the documents referred to in Article 46 of Directive ../../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council or in Article 45(3) of Directive ../../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2 dalis negali būti taikoma Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos nuostatoms, arba Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvos ../../EB nuostatoms.
Paragraph 2 shall not apply to the provisions of the European Parliament and of the Council or of Directive ../../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.