natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kiekvienai kaimo plėtros programai valstybė narė , atsižvelgdama į savo institucinę struktūrą, skiria:
For each rural development programme the Member State shall, in accordance with its institutional structure, designate:
a) valdymo instituciją, viešąją arba privačią, regioninę arba vietinę įstaigą, paskirtą valstybės narės, arba pati valstybė narė atlieka tą užduotį, kad galėtų vadovauti programai;
(a) the managing authority, being a public or private national, regional or local body designated by the Member State, or the Member State itself when it carries out that task, to manage a programme;
a) valdymo instituciją, viešąją arba privačią, regioninę arba vietinę įstaigą, paskirtą valstybės narės, atsižvelgiant į jos institucinę struktūrą arba pati valstybė narė atlieka tą užduotį, kad galėtų vadovauti programai;
(a) the managing authority, being a public or private national, regional or local body designated by the Member State in accordance with its institutional structure , or the Member State itself when it carries out that task, to manage a programme;
77 straipsnio 1 dalies a punktas
Article 77, paragraph 1, point (a)
a) užtikrina, kad operacijos finansavimui būtų atrinktos pagal kaimo plėtros programai taikomus kriterijus ir kad jos atitiktų galiojančias Bendrijos ir nacionalines taisykles bei Bendrijos politikos sritis per visą jų įgyvendinimo laikotarpį;
(a) ensuring that operations are selected for funding in accordance with the criteria applicable to the rural development programme and that they comply, for the whole period of their execution, with applicable Community and national rules and Community policies;
92 straipsnis
Article 92
70 straipsnio 2 dalyje minimam rezervui skiriama suma naudojama LEADER metodo įgyvendinimui programose remti.
The amount allocated to the reserve referred to in Article 70(2) shall be used to support implementation of the LEADER approach in programmes.
LEADER metodo įgyvendinimas vertinamas pagal objektyvius kriterijus, įskaitant:
Implementation of the LEADER approach shall be evaluated on the basis of objective criteria including:
a) LEADER metodui teikiamą prioritetą,
(a) the priority given to the LEADER approach,
b)LEADER metodo teritorinę aprėptį,
(b) the territorial coverage of the LEADER approach,
c) etapą, pasiektą įgyvendinant LEADER prioritetinę kryptį,
(c) the stage reached in implementing the LEADER priority axis,
d) svertų poveikį privačiam kapitalui,
(d) the leverage effect on private capital,
e) tarpinių vertinimų rezultatus.
(e)the results of mid-term evaluations.
95 straipsnio 1 dalis
Article 95, paragraph 1
Komisijai padeda Kaimo plėtros komitetas (toliau – Komitetas).
The Commission shall be assisted by a Rural Development Committee (hereinafter: the ‘Committee’).
Komisijai padeda Kaimo plėtros komitetas ir Nuolatinis miškų komitetas (toliau – Komitetas).
The Commission shall be assisted by a Rural Development Committee and a Standing Committee on Forestry (hereinafter: the ‘Committee’).
Involvement of the forestry industry in the implementation of the programme in accordance with the industry's significance for the development of rural areas and better coordination of forest-relevant activities at Member State and EU level.
Involvement of the forestry industry in the implementation of the programme in accordance with the industry’s significance for the development of rural areas and better coordination of forest-relevant activities at Member State and EU level.
98 straipsnio 2 dalis
Article 98, paragraph 2
Tarybos direktyvos ir sprendimai, nustatantys ir iš dalies keičiantys nepalankių sričių sąrašus, numatytus Reglamento (EB) Nr. 950/97 21 straipsnio 2 dalyje, panaikinami.
Council Directives and Decisions laying down and amending the lists of less-favoured areas referred to in Article 21(2) of Regulation (EC) No 950/97 are repealed.
The repeal of the directives and decisions referred to in Article 98(2) would create major problems in the immediate future.
The repeal of the directives and decisions referred to in Article 98(2) would create major problems in the immediate future.
It would be wiser to carry out detailed studies and in the meantime to leave the lists of less-favoured areas unaltered, pending the results of the studies
It would be wiser to carry out detailed studies and in the meantime to leave the lists of less-favoured areas unaltered, pending the results of the studies.
I priedo 35 straipsnio 3 dalies 2 ir 3 skyriai
Annexe I, Article 35, paragraph 3, columns 2 and 3
Didžiausia gamtinės kliūties išmoka
Maximum natural handicap payment
250 už vieną NŽP hektarą
250 Per hectare of UAA
Didžiausia išmoka kalnuotoms vietovėms arba sritims, kuriose yra kitų kliūčių
Maximum handicap payment for mountain areas and for areas with other handicaps
BIUDŽETO KOMITETO NUOMONĖ
OPINION OF THE commiTTEE ON BUDGETS
Žemės ūkio komitetui
for the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
dėl pasiūlymo parengti Tarybos reglamentą dėl Europos žemės ūkio kaimo plėtros fondo (EŽUKPF) paramos kaimo plėtrai
on the proposal for a Council Regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
Biudžeto komitetas ragina atsakingą Žemės ūkio ir kaimo plėtros komitetą į savo pranešimą įtraukti šiuos pakeitimus:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
70 straipsnio 1dalis
Article 70, paragraph 1
2007–2013 m. turimi Fondo įsipareigoti ištekliai sudaro 88,75 milijardo eurų 2004 m. kainomis.
The resources available for commitment from the Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 shall be EUR 88.75 billion at 2004 prices.
Metinis išteklių paskirstymas pateiktas II priede.
The annual breakdown is shown in Annex II.
Iš šių išteklių ne mažiau kaip 31,3 milijardo eurų 2004 m. kainomis yra sutelkiama konvergencijos tikslui tinkamuose regionuose.
Of these resources, at least EUR 31.3 billion at 2004 prices shall be concentrated in regions eligible for the Convergence Objective.
2007–2013 m. turimi Fondo įsipareigoti ištekliai sudaro XXX milijardo eurų 2004 m. kainomis.
The resources available for commitment from the Fund for the period 2007 to 2013 shall be EUR XXX billion at 2004 prices.
The overall amount indicated in paragraph 1 must be regarded as purely indicative until a decision has been taken on the 2007-2013 financial perspectives
The overall amount indicated in paragraph 1 must be regarded as purely indicative until a decision has been taken on the 2007-2013 financial perspectives.
pasiūlymas dėl Tarybos reglamento dėl Europos žemės ūkio kaimo plėtros fondo (EŽŪKPF) paramos kaimo plėtrai
Proposal for a Council regulation on support for rural development by EAFRD
Gérardas Deprezas 20.9.2004
Gérard Deprez 20.9.2004
Reimer Böge, Simon Busuttil, Paulo Casaca, Gérard Deprez, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Hynek Fajmon, Markus Ferber, Ingeborg Gräßle, Catherine Guy-Quint, Ville Itälä, Anne Elisabet Jensen, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk, Janusz Lewandowski, Vladimír Maňka, Giovanni Pittella, Anders Samuelsen, László Surján, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
Reimer Böge, Simon Busuttil, Paulo Casaca, Gérard Deprez, Ingeborg Gräßle, Louis Grech, Catherine Guy-Quint, Ville Itälä, Anne Elisabet Jensen, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Janusz Lewandowski, Vladimír Maňka, Anders Samuelsen, László Surján, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
Regioninės plėtros komiteto NUOMONĖ
OPINION OF THE commiTTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
teikiama Žemės ūkio ir kaimo plėtros komitetui
for the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
dėl pasiūlymo parengti Tarybos reglamentą dėl Europos žemės ūkio kaimo plėtros fondo (EŽUKPF) paramos kaimo plėtrai
on the proposal for a Council regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
This proposal aims at reinforcing the EU’s rural development policy and simplifying its implementation by replacing the former variety of rural development programmes by one funding and programming instrument, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
This proposal aims at reinforcing the EU’s rural development policy and simplifying its implementation by replacing the former variety of rural development programmes by one funding and programming instrument, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
The draftswoman welcomes the proposal to strengthen Rural Development and believes that greater recognition must be given to the role of Rural Development in contributing to balanced regional development and regional and national growth in the context of the Lisbon process and the Goteborg conclusions.
The draftswoman welcomes the proposal to strengthen Rural Development and believes that greater recognition must be given to the role of Rural Development in contributing to balanced regional development and regional and national growth in the context of the Lisbon process and the Goteborg conclusions.
The move to simplification of the Rural Development policy by bringing it under a single funding and programming network is very positive.
The move to simplification of the Rural Development policy by bringing it under a single funding and programming network is very positive.
However, it must be ensured that the simplification process applies at all levels.
However, it must be ensured that the simplification process applies at all levels.
The implementation of the Rural Development policy needs adequate funding and any cut in the proposed funding for Rural Development will impact negatively on the ability of rural areas to achieve economic growth thereby preventing these areas from effectively contributing to the Lisbon Process.
The implementation of the Rural Development policy needs adequate funding and any cut in the proposed funding for Rural Development will impact negatively on the ability of rural areas to achieve economic growth thereby preventing these areas from effectively contributing to the Lisbon Process.
The call for genuine stakeholder consultation and participation in the preparation of Rural Development strategies and policies is welcome.
The call for genuine stakeholder consultation and participation in the preparation of Rural Development strategies and policies is welcome.
The draftswoman recommends a flexible approach at National and EU level in the drawing up of Rural Development strategies in order to ensure that local and regional programmes can adequately promote the development of rural areas using tailor made initiatives which have emerged from genuine stakeholder consultation.
The draftswoman recommends a flexible approach at National and EU level in the drawing up of Rural Development strategies in order to ensure that local and regional programmes can adequately promote the development of rural areas using tailor made initiatives which have emerged from genuine stakeholder consultation.
It is very encouraging that the proposal designates the Diversification of the Rural Economy and Quality of life in Rural Areas as one of the 3 priority axes of the new Rural Development policy.
It is very encouraging that the proposal designates the Diversification of the Rural Economy and Quality of life in Rural Areas as one of the 3 priority axes of the new Rural Development policy.
This axis could prove to be a motor for development in many rural areas and if implemented correctly could have a multiplier effect leading to job creation, diversification of activities, added value to products and a template of development based on the bottom up approach.
This axis could prove to be a motor for development in many rural areas and if implemented correctly could have a multiplier effect leading to job creation, diversification of activities, added value to products and a template of development based on the bottom up approach.
Particular attention should be focused on the generation of Social Capital in particular youth capital as this will play a significant role in the long term sustainable development of rural areas.
Particular attention should be focused on the generation of Social Capital in particular youth capital as this will play a significant role in the long‑term sustainable development of rural areas.
Rural Development policy must assist the creation of sustainable off-farm jobs located within a reasonable commuting distance from the homes of workers in conjunction with Regional and Cohesion policies.
Rural Development policy must assist the creation of sustainable off-farm jobs located within a reasonable commuting distance from the homes of workers in conjunction with Regional and Cohesion policies.
It is appreciated that each programme contains a specific LEADER axis to finance the implementation of the local development strategies of local development groups built on the 3 thematic axes.
It is appreciated that each programme contains a specific LEADER axis to finance the implementation of the local development strategies of local development groups built on the 3 thematic axes.
However, the 3% performance fund allocated to LEADER should be incorporated into the minimum allocation for LEADER.
However, the 3 % performance fund allocated to LEADER should be incorporated into the minimum allocation for LEADER.
The minimum budgetary allocation for each of the 3 axes is reflecting a balance between the three axes, yet allowing sufficient flexibility at Local /Regional/National level to devise programmes suited to Local/Regional/National needs.
The minimum budgetary allocation for each of the 3 axes is reflecting a balance between the three axes, yet allowing sufficient flexibility at Local /Regional/National level to devise programmes suited to Local/Regional/National needs.
Unfortunately, sufficient account is not taken of the very many people who leave farming each year or those who are engaged in part-time farming.
Unfortunately, sufficient account is not taken of the very many people who leave farming each year or those who are engaged in part-time farming.
Appropriate training and retraining opportunities should be put in place to allow these people to access other types of employment within their local areas.
Appropriate training and retraining opportunities should be put in place to allow these people to access other types of employment within their local areas.
Furthermore, there is concern that the criteria for designation of areas with natural handicaps will be redefined without taking into account many other factors which contribute to disadvantage e.g. peripheral location, socio-economic factors etc.
Furthermore, there is concern that the criteria for designation of areas with natural handicaps will be redefined without taking into account many other factors which contribute to disadvantage e.g. peripheral location, socio-economic factors etc.
It would be helpful to consider establishing a transition period for phasing out aid to farmers in areas which will no longer be eligible for support.
It would be helpful to consider establishing a transition period for phasing out aid to farmers in areas which will no longer be eligible for support.
In addition, grants for planting forests, the reduction of farm forest premia and the reduction of the premium time span should be handled with caution since this will lead to a drop in afforestation as forestry will no longer be seen as a viable farm enterprise.
In addition, grants for planting forests, the reduction of farm forest premiums and the reduction of the premium time span should be handled with caution since this will lead to a drop in afforestation as forestry will no longer be seen as a viable farm enterprise.
This will also have other implications, e.g. unemployment in the forestry industry will result - this will be particularly severe in rural areas, opportunities for carbon sequestration will be lost, etc.
This will also have other implications, e.g. unemployment in the forestry industry will result - this will be particularly severe in rural areas, opportunities for carbon sequestration will be lost, etc.
It is positive that compensatory payments to farmers and forest owners/mangers are made for income forgone and cost incurred due to the implementation of site network.
It is positive that compensatory payments to farmers and forest owners/mangers are made for income forgone and cost incurred due to the implementation of site network.
Nevertheless, a separate funding instrument is necessary for Natura 2000.
Nevertheless, a separate funding instrument is necessary for Natura 2000.
There is a risk that the objectives of Natura 2000 may not be attained due to inadequate funding.
There is a risk that the objectives of Natura 2000 may not be attained due to inadequate funding.
Finally, the draftswoman suggests that other community policies should be “rural proofed” i.e. verification that they do not conflict with rural development policy, and indeed where appropriate actively promote rural development objectives.
Finally, the draftswoman suggests that other community policies should be ‘rural proofed’ i.e. verification that they do not conflict with rural development policy, and indeed where appropriate actively promote rural development objectives.
Regioninės plėtros komitetas prašo atsakingą Žemės ūkio ir kaimo plėtros komitetą į savo pranešimą įtraukti šiuos pakeitimus:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(6) Europos žemės ūkio kaimo plėtros fondo (toliau – Fondas) veikla ir operacijos, prie kurių jis prisideda, turi būti nuoseklios bei suderinamos su kitomis Bendrijos politikos sritimis ir atitikti visus Bendrijos teisės aktus.
(6) The activities of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, hereinafter called the ‘Fund’, and the operations to which it contributes must be consistent and compatible with the other Community policies and comply with all Community legislation.
(6) Europos žemės ūkio kaimo plėtros fondo (toliau – Fondas) veikla ir operacijos, prie kurių jis prisideda, turi būti nuoseklios bei suderinamos su kitomis Bendrijos politikos , ypač su socialinės, ekonominės ir teritorinės sanglaudos politikos kaimo vietovėse, sritimis ir atitikti visus Bendrijos teisės aktus.
(6) The activities of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, hereinafter called the ‘Fund’, and the operations to which it contributes must be consistent and compatible with the other Community policies , especially those on socio-economic and territorial cohesion for rural areas, and comply with all Community legislation.
While addressing territorial specificities, the structural funds are intervening in rural areas.
While addressing territorial specificities, the structural funds are intervening in rural areas.
It is of paramount importance to ensure consistency and strategic planning with the EAFRD interventions.
It is of paramount importance to ensure consistency and strategic planning with the EAFRD interventions.
(7) Vykdydama su kaimo plėtra susijusią veiklą, Bendrija rūpinasi neatitikčių šalinimu bei vyrų ir moterų lygybės skatinimu laikydamasi Sutarties 2 ir 3 straipsnių nuostatų.
(7) In its action in favour of rural development the Community takes care to encourage the elimination of disparities and the promotion of equality between women and men in accordance with Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty.
(7) Vykdydama su kaimo plėtra susijusią veiklą, Bendrija rūpinasi neatitikčių šalinimu bei nediskriminavimo ir vyrų ir moterų lygybės skatinimu laikydamasi Sutarties 2 ir 3 straipsnių nuostatų.
(7) In its action in favour of rural development the Community takes care to encourage the elimination of disparities and the promotion of non-discrimination and equality between women and men in accordance with Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty.
The non-discrimination principle has a broader scope than the one encompassed by merely the gender based criteria.
The non-discrimination principle has a broader scope than the one encompassed by merely the gender‑based criteria.
(8a) Kultūros raida, natūralios ir žmogaus sukurtos aplinkos kokybė, kokybinis ir kultūrinis gyvenimo aspektai bei darniojo turizmo raida turi prisidėti kuriant ekonomiškai ir socialiai patrauklesnes kaimo vietoves tiek, kiek tai skatina kurti ilgalaikį užimtumą.
(8a) Cultural development, the quality of the natural and the man-made environment, the qualitative and cultural dimension of life and the development of sustainable tourism contribute to making rural areas economically and socially more attractive in so far as they encourage the creation of sustainable employment.
(10) Planuojant kaimo plėtrą būtina laikytis Bendrijos ir nacionalinių prioritetų ir papildyti kitas Bendrijos politikos sritis, ypač žemės ūkio rinkos politiką, sanglaudos politiką ir bendrą žuvininkystės politiką.
(10) The programming of rural development should comply with Community and national priorities and complement the other Community policies, in particular the agricultural market policy, cohesion policy and Common Fisheries Policy.
(10) Planuojant kaimo plėtrą būtina laikytis Bendrijos ir nacionalinių prioritetų ir papildyti kitas Bendrijos politikos sritis, ypač žemės ūkio rinkos politiką, sanglaudos politiką, socialinės įtraukties, nediskriminavimo ir lyčių lygybės skatinimo politikas bei bendrą žuvininkystės politiką.
(10) The programming of rural development should comply with Community and national priorities and complement the other Community policies, in particular the agricultural market policy, cohesion policy , policies for social inclusion, non-discrimination and promotion of equal opportunities and common fisheries policy.
Todėl EŽŪKPF naudojimas turi prisidėti prie sinergijos tarp konvergencijos tikslo ir konkurencingumo kaimo vietovėse tikslo palaikymo, įtraukiant į kaimo strateginius planus EKPF ir ESF veiklą.
The use of the EAFRD should therefore contribute to maintaining a synergy between the convergence objective and the objective of competitiveness in rural areas by including ERDF and ESF actions in the rural strategic plans.
Nuoseklumas turi būti užtikrinamas tiek programų kūrimo, tiek ir įgyvendinimo lygiu.
Consistency should be ensured at both programming and implementation levels.
30 konstatuojamoji dalis
Recital 30
(30) (30) Parama specifiniams žemės valdymo metodams turi būti prisidedama prie tvaraus vystymosi, kai ūkininkai ir miško savininkai yra skatinami pirmiausia taikyti žemėtvarkos metodus, suderinamus su būtinybe išsaugoti natūralią aplinką ir landšaftą ir apsaugoti gamtos išteklius bei protingai jais naudotis.
(30) Support for specific methods of land management should contribute to sustainable development by encouraging farmers and forest holders in particular to employ methods of land use compatible with the need to preserve the natural environment and landscape and protect and improve resources.
Ji turėtų prisidėti prie 6-osios Bendrijos aplinkos apsaugos veiksmų programos įgyvendinimo ir pirmininkaujančios valstybės išvadų dėl tvaraus vystymosi strategijos.
It should contribute to the implementation of the 6th Community Environment Action Programme and the Presidency conclusions regarding the Sustainable Development Strategy.
Pagrindiniai klausimai, į kuriuos turi būti kreipiamas dėmesys, yra šie: biologinė įvairovė, NATURA 2000 buveinių valdymas, vandens ir dirvožemio apsauga, klimato kaitos švelninimas, įskaitant šiltnamio dujų išskyrimo mažinimą, amoniako išskyrimo mažinimą ir subalansuotą pesticidų naudojimą.
Key issues to be addressed include biodiversity, NATURA 2000 site management, the protection of water and soil, climate change migration including the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the reduction of ammonia emissions and the sustainable use of pesticides.
Natura 2000 valdymo veiksmai, kurie negali būti finansuojami iš struktūrinių arba kaimo plėtros fondų, turi būti finansuojami iš ES biologinės įvairovės fondo, sukurto pagal LIFE + pasiūlymą.
Natura 2000 management activities that cannot be funded from either structural or rural development funds should be funded by a dedicated EU fund for biodiversity set up under the LIFE+ proposal.