natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ārēju izmeklēšanu sāk ar Biroja ģenerāldirektora lēmumu pēc viņa ierosmes vai pēc attiecīgās dalībvalsts vai Komisijas lūguma.
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission.
Ārēju izmeklēšanu sāk ar Biroja ģenerāldirektora lēmumu pēc viņa ierosmes vai pēc attiecīgās dalībvalsts, Komisijas vai Eiropas Parlamenta lūguma.
The decision to open an external investigation shall be taken by the Director‑General of the Office, acting on his own initiative or following a request from a Member State concerned or the Commission or the European Parliament .
It should be clear that the director-general may open external investigations in response to requests by the European Parliament as well as a Member State or the Commission.
It should be clear that the Director General may open external investigations in response to requests by the European Parliament as well as a Member State or the Commission.
Kamēr Birojs veic iekšēju izmeklēšanu šīs regulas izpratnē, iestādes, organizācijas, biroji vai aģentūras nesāk paralēlu administratīvo izmeklēšanu par tiem pašiem faktiem.
While the Office is conducting an internal investigation within the meaning of this Regulation, the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies shall not open a parallel investigation into the same facts.
Pat, ja Birojs veic iekšēju izmeklēšanu šīs regulas izpratnē, iestādes, organizācijas, biroji vai aģentūras var sākt paralēlu administratīvo izmeklēšanu par tiem pašiem faktiem , kuru vajadzētu veikt, balstoties uz visplašāko iespējamo sadarbību ar OLAF .
Even if the Office is conducting an internal investigation within the meaning of this Regulation, the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies may open a parallel investigation into the same facts , which should be conducted on the basis of the fullest possible cooperation with OLAF .
It is obvious that it is impossible to forbid an institution to conduct an investigation in connection with its internal oversight powers and that, this being so, requiring cooperation between the different investigations fully accords with the 'structural dialogue' between OLAF and the institutions referred to in Article 11a of the Commission proposal.
It is obvious that it is impossible to forbid an institution to conduct an investigation in connection with its internal oversight powers and that, this being so, requiring cooperation between the different investigations fully accords with the 'structural dialogue' between OLAF and the institutions referred to in Article 11a of the Commission proposal.
7.a pants – 2. punkts – 1. daļa
Article 7a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Ja izmeklēšana atklāj , ka iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras loceklis, vadītājs, ierēdnis vai darbinieks, vai jebkura cita persona, kas tur strādā, vai uzņēmējs var būt personiski iesaistīts, attiecīgo personu par to informē, ja vien tas netraucē izmeklēšanas gaitai.
As soon as an investigation reveals that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed, provided that this does not prejudice the conduct of the investigation.
Ja ir nopietni pierādījumi tam , ka iestādes, organizācijas, biroja vai aģentūras loceklis, vadītājs, ierēdnis vai darbinieks, vai jebkura cita persona, kas tur strādā, vai uzņēmējs var būt personiski iesaistīts, attiecīgo personu par to informē , izmantojot šim nolūkam paredzētu paziņojumu, kurā precīzi norāda kādas darbības tā, iespējams, veikusi, to, kādā statusā attiecīgā persona ir iesaistīta, kādas procesuālas garantijas tai ir paredzētas un jo īpaši veidu, kādā tā var iesniegt savas piezīmes un dokumentus, ko tā uzskata par svarīgiem šajā lietā .
As soon as there is solid evidence that a member, manager, official or other servant or a person serving an institution, body, office or agency or an economic operator may be personally implicated in a matter, the person concerned shall be informed by means of an approp ria te communication giving precise details of the action he is alleged to have committed, the capacity in which he is involved in the matter, what procedural guarantees are provided for his benefit and, in particular, how he can submit any observations and documents which he considers relevant.
Ja tiek uzskatīts, ka šādas paziņojuma sniegšana traucētu izmeklēšanas gaitai , ir pieļaujami izņēmumi.
Where it is deemed that the despatch of such a communication would prejudice the conduct of the investigation , exceptions may be made .
The person concerned should be informed in a communication that there is solid evidence of their involvement.
The person concerned should be informed in a communication that there is solid evidence of their involvement.
The communication should include the abovementioned information so as to enable the person concerned to react appropriately.
The communication should include the abovementioned information so as to enable the person concerned to react appropriately.
A decision not to send such a communication can, of course, be taken if it is deemed that to do so would be detrimental to the investigation.
A decision not to send such a communication can, of course, be taken if it is deemed that to do so would be detrimental to the investigation.
7.a pants – 2. punkts – 2. daļa
Article 7 a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Personīgi iesaistītai personai ir tiesības neliecināt pret sevi .
That person must be given a summary of such matters in the invitation to comment.
(Grozījums uz tekstu latviešu valodā neattiecas.)
He is entitled to be assisted by a person of his choice.
7.a pants – 2. punkts – 3. daļa
Article 7a – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Gadījumos, kad izmeklēšanai vajadzīga pilnīga slepenība vai vajadzīgi izmeklēšanas līdzekļi, kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē vai, ārējas izmeklēšanas gadījumā, valsts kompetentās iestādes kompetencē, Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt atlikt pildīt pienākumu uzaicināt personīgi iesaistīto personu izklāstīt savus apsvērumus.
In cases requiring absolute secrecy to be maintained for the sake of the investigation and entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director‑General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to ask the person implicated to make his views known.
Par to viņš vispirms informē kontroles padomdevēju, kas sniedz atzinumu saskaņā ar 14. panta 3. punktu.
He shall first notify the Review Adviser, who shall give an opinion in accordance with Article 14(3).
Ja notiek iekšēja izmeklēšana, Biroja ģenerāldirektors šo lēmumu saskaņo ar iestādi, organizāciju, biroju vai aģentūru, kurai attiecīgā persona ir piederīga.
In the case of an internal investigation, the Director‑General of the Office shall take his decision in agreement with the institution, body, office or agency to which the person concerned belongs.
Gadījumos, kad izmeklēšanu nepieciešams veikt konfidenciāli vai ir vajadzīgi izmeklēšanas līdzekļi, kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē vai ārējas izmeklēšanas gadījumā valsts kompetentās iestādes kompetencē, Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt atlikt pildīt pienākumu nosūtīt šā punkta otrajā daļā paredzēto paziņojumu vai uzaicināt personīgi iesaistīto personu izklāstīt savus apsvērumus.
In cases where the investigation needs to be conducted on a confidential basis and entailing use of investigative proceedings falling under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority or, in the case of an external investigation, that of a competent national authority, the Director‑General of the Office may decide to defer fulfilment of the obligation to send the communication referred to in the second paragraph or to ask the person implicated to make his views known.
Šajā pantā paredzētos iesaistītās personas tiesību un garantiju ierobežojumus drīkst piemērot tikai tad, ja tie atbilst atzinumam, ko saskaņā ar 14. panta 3. punktu iepriekš pieņēmis kontroles padomdevējs.
Restricting the rights of the person implicated by the investigation and the guarantees afforded him as provided for in this Article shall be permissible only if such restrictions are in accordance with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser pursuant to Article 4(3).
The wording should make it clear that the restrictions provided for in Article 7a of the rights of the person under investigation and the guarantees afforded him on the grounds of confidentiality or the involvement of national authorities may be imposed only if they conform with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser in accordance with Article 4(3) .
The wording should make it clear that the restrictions provided for in Article 7a of the rights of the person under investigation and the guarantees afforded him on the grounds of confidentiality or the involvement of national authorities may be imposed only if they conform with the opinion adopted beforehand by the Review Adviser in accordance with Article 4(3) .
Uzaicinājums uz jebkādu iztaujāšanu gan lieciniekam, gan personai, kas ir personīgi iesaistīta 2. punkta izpratnē, jānosūta, par to paziņojot vismaz astoņas darba dienas iepriekš, šo termiņu var saīsināt, par to vienojoties ar personu, kas jāiztaujā.
The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least eight working days’ notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the agreement of the person to be interviewed.
Uzaicinājums uz jebkādu iztaujāšanu gan lieciniekam, gan personai, kas ir personīgi iesaistīta 2. punkta izpratnē, jānosūta, par to paziņojot vismaz desmit darba dienas iepriekš, šo termiņu var saīsināt, ja persona, kas jāiztaujā, skaidri izteikusi savu piekrišanu .
The invitation to any interview, whether with a witness or with a person implicated personally within the meaning of paragraph 2, must be sent with at least ten working days’ notice; the period of notice may be shortened with the express consent of the person to be interviewed.
Pavēstē tiek uzskaitītas izsauktās personas tiesības.
The invitation shall include a list of the rights of the person interviewed.
Ja iztaujāšanas gaitā tiek iegūti pierādījumi par to, ka liecinieka statusā iztaujājamā persona varētu būt iesaistīta izmeklējamos faktos, nekavējoties piemēro 2. punktā paredzētos procesuālos noteikumus.
When, in the course of the interview, evidence emerges that the person interviewed as a witness may be involved in the facts under investigation, the procedural rules provided for in paragraph 2 shall apply at once.
The period of notice should be longer.
The period of notice should be longer.
Also, as procedural guarantees already apply to persons implicated personally, the wording should make it clear that the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 7a(2) apply only to persons interviewed as witnesses who could be regarded as involved in the facts under investigation.
Also, as procedural guarantees already apply to persons implicated personally, the wording should make it clear that the procedural guarantees provided for in Article 7a(2) apply only to persons interviewed as witnesses who could be regarded as involved in the facts under investigation.
a) plašāku aizsardzību, kas attiecīgā gadījumā izriet no Līgumu noteikumiem, kā arī piemērojamiem valstu noteikumiem;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties or any relevant national provisions;
a) plašāku aizsardzību, kas attiecīgā gadījumā izriet no Līgumu noteikumiem, Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību hartas, kā arī jebkuriem citiem piemērojamiem valstu vai Kopienas noteikumiem, tostarp no noteikumiem, kurus paredz Protokols par privilēģijām un neaizskaramību Eiropas Kopienās ;
(a) to more extensive protection which may derive from the rules of the Treaties , the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union or any other relevant national or Community provisions , including the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities ;
b) Eiropas Parlamenta deputātu nolikumā un Eiropas Kopienu Civildienesta noteikumos paredzētās tiesības un pienākumus.
(b) to rights and obligations conferred by the Statute for Members of the European Parliament or the Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities .
The possible sources of more extensive guarantees for persons implicated in investigation should be indicated in greater detail.
The possible sources of more extensive guarantees for persons implicated in investigation should be indicated in greater detail.
Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt nesniegt pirmajā daļā minēto paziņojumu vienīgi tad, ja izmeklēšanai vajadzīga pilnīga slepenība vai vajadzīgi izmeklēšanas līdzekļi , kas ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē.
The Director‑General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases requiring the maintenance of absolute secrecy and use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority.
Biroja ģenerāldirektors var nolemt nesniegt pirmajā daļā minēto paziņojumu vienīgi gadījumos, ja izmeklēšanu nepieciešams veikt konfidenciāli vai tā ir saistīta ar izmeklēšanas līdzekļu izmantošanu , kuri ir valsts tiesu iestāžu kompetencē, un vienīgi tad, ja šāds lēmums atbilst kontroles padomdevēja šajā nolūkā sniegtajam atzinumam .
The Director‑General of the Office may decide not to make the communication referred to in the first subparagraph in cases where the investigation needs to be conducted on a confidential basis and entailing the use of investigative measures that fall under the jurisdiction of a national judicial authority , but only if that decision accords with the opinion delivered by the Review Adviser in that connection .
It should be made clear that the communication may be dispensed with only in accordance with the opinion of the Review Adviser, whose role is to ensure compliance with the procedural guarantees applicable to the persons involved in the investigation.
It should be made clear that the communication may be dispensed with only in accordance with the opinion of the Review Adviser, whose role is to ensure compliance with the procedural guarantees applicable to the persons involved in the investigation.
Minētās piezīmes kopā ar šā punkta pirmajā daļā paredzēto informāciju nosūta attiecīgajai dalībvalstij un attiecīgajai iestādei.
Those comments shall be sent to the Member State concerned together with the information referred to in paragraph 1.
Attiecīgajai personai vai tās pilnvarotajai personai nodrošina iespēju iepriekš iepazīties ar izmeklēšanas lietas materiāliem.
The person concerned or his authorised representative shall be given the opportunity at the outset to inspect the files relating to the investigation
The statement of the person involved must be forwarded to the Member States so that they are fully informed of the facts of the case.
The statement of the person involved must be forwarded to the Member States so that they are fully informed of the facts of the case.
It should be made clear in this connection that there must be a full right of inspection of the case files so as to allow the person concerned to prepare a full statement.
It should be made clear in this connection that there must be a full right of inspection of the case files so as to allow the person concerned to prepare a full statement.
Biroja ģenerāldirektors vēršas pie Kontroles padomdevēja ar lūgumu sniegt atzinumu gadījumos, kas paredzēti 6. pantā, 7. pantā un 7.a panta 2. punkta trešajā daļā.
Cases shall be referred for the opinion of the Review Adviser by the Director‑General of the Office in the circumstances referred to in Article 6(7) and the third subparagraph of Article 7a(2).
Turklāt Biroja ģenerāldirektors var vērsties pie kontroles padomdevēja ar jebkādu pieprasījumu attiecībā uz izmeklēšanas kontroli.
The Director‑General of the Office may also submit any request to the Review Adviser in connection with the review of investigations.
Biroja ģenerāldirektors vēršas pie Kontroles padomdevēja ar lūgumu sniegt atzinumu gadījumos, kas paredzēti 6. pantā, 7. pantā, 7.a panta 2. punkta trešajā daļā un 8.a panta otrajā daļā .
Cases shall be referred for the opinion of the Review Adviser by the Director‑General of the Office in the circumstances referred to in Article 6(7) , the third subparagraph of Article 7a(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 8a .
Article 14(4) of the proposal should be amended in tandem with the proposed amendment to the second subparagraph of article 8a.
Article 14(4) of the proposal should be amended in tandem with the proposed amendment to the second subparagraph of Article 8a.
Šīs regulas īstenošanas pasākumus, jo īpaši attiecībā uz procesuālo garantiju piemērošanu Biroja administratīvajā izmeklēšanā, pieņem saskaņā ar 15.b panta 2. punktā noteikto regulatīvo kontroles procedūru.
The measures to implement this Regulation, particularly those relating to the application of procedural guarantees in administrative investigations by the Office , shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 15b(2).
The Commission should have conferred upon it the delegated power to adopt specific measures to implement this regulation, particularly as regards the application of procedural guarantees in administrative investigations by the Office.
The Commission should have conferred upon it the delegated power to adopt specific measures to implement this regulation, particularly as regards the application of procedural guarantees in administrative investigations by the Office.
Since such measures are general in nature and intended to update and supplement certain non-essential aspects of this regulation, they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Since such measures are general in nature and intended to update and supplement certain non-essential aspects of this regulation, they should be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Komisijai palīdz komiteja, kas izveidota saskaņā ar Padomes Regulas (EK) Nr. 515/97 43. pantu.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee instituted by Article 43 of Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97.
Ja ir atsauce uz šo punktu, piemēro Lēmuma 1999/468/EK 5.a panta 1. līdz 4. punktu un 7. pantu, ņemot vērā minētā lēmuma 8. panta noteikumus.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, paragraphs 1 to 4 of Article 5a and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Atzinumu sniedza
Opinion delivered by
par Eiropas ombuda īpašo ziņojumu Eiropas Parlamentam, kas sagatavots pēc ieteikuma projekta Eiropas Savienības Padomei sakarā ar sūdzību Nr. 1487/2005/GG
on the Special Report by the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 1487/2005/GG
– ņemot vērā EK līguma 195. panta 1. punkta otro daļu,
– having regard to Article 195(1), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,
– ņemot vērā Eiropas Parlamenta 1994. gada 9. marta lēmumu 94/262/EOTK, EK, Euratom par noteikumiem un vispārējiem nosacījumiem, kas reglamentē ombuda pienākumu izpildi
– having regard to the Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties
– ņemot vērā Special Eurobarometer Nr. 237 un 243 numurā publicēto informāciju par Eiropas Komisijas pētījumiem attiecībā uz valodu izplatību Eiropas Savienībā,
– having regard to the studies carried out by the European Commission which were published in Special Eurobarometer Nos 237 and 243 on the dissemination of languages in the European Union,
– ņemot vērā Eiropas ombuda statūtu 3. panta 5. punktu, kurā noteikts, ka ombuds kopā ar attiecīgo iestādi vai struktūrvienību, cik iespējams, meklē risinājumu, lai novērstu administratīvās kļūmes un sūdzību apmierinātu,
– having regard to Article 3(5) of the Statute of the Ombudsman, which directs the Ombudsman to seek, as far as possible, a solution with the institution concerned in order to eliminate the instance of maladministration and satisfy the complainant,
– ņemot vēra deputātu Anna Záborská , Bernd Posselt , Francis Wurtz , Zita Gurmai un Marian Harkin iesniegto rakstisko deklarāciju 48/2008 par daudzvalodību, kuru līdz šim ir parakstījuši 276 deputāti,
– having regard to Written Declaration 48/2008 by Anna Záborská, Bernd Posselt, Francis Wurtz, Zita Gurmai and Marian Harkin on multilingualism, which has so far gathered 276 signatories,
– ņemot vērā Lūgumrakstu komitejas ziņojumu ( A6-0395/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0395/2008 ),
A. tā kā pārredzamības uzlabošana, daudzvalodības veicināšana un precīzas informācijas sniegšana sabiedrībai ir viens no ES un tās iestāžu prioritārajiem mērķiem;
A. whereas improved transparency, the promotion of multilingualism and the provision of accurate information to the public are objectives which are given the highest priority by the EU and its institutions,
B. tā kā viens no demokrātiskas leģitimitātes un pārredzamības vispārējo pamatprincipu svarīgiem priekšnoteikumiem un sastāvdaļām ir vienkāršota piekļuve informācijai visiem ES pilsoņiem;
B. whereas ease of access to information for all citizens of the EU is an important prerequisite for, and a basic element of, the general principles of democratic legitimacy and transparency,
C. cenšoties nodrošināt tiešu piekļuvi informācijai par ES iestāžu darbību visās to struktūrās pēc iespējas vairāk iedzīvotājiem;
C. wishing to enable as many citizens as possible to have direct access to information on the activities of the EU institutions in all their formations,
D. apzinoties, ka šī vēlme jāsaskaņo ar loģistikas problēmu, ko rada ES oficiālo valodu lielais skaits;
D. whereas this wish must be reconciled with the logistical challenge posed by a large number of official EU languages,
E. apzinoties, ka Internets kļūst par arvien svarīgāku plašsaziņas līdzekli informācijas iegūšanai, un tādēļ arī Eiropas Savienībai tas jāizmanto centienos nodrošināt pārredzamību un izplatīt informāciju,
E. whereas the internet is an increasingly important means of obtaining information and must, accordingly, be used by the European Union in its efforts to achieve transparency and disseminate information,
(a) Padome, tāpat kā jebkura cita ES iestāde, pirmām kārtām pati ir atbildīga par prezidentūras tīmekļa vietnēm un tajās izmantotajām valodām;
(a) the Council, like every EU institution, is, in the first instance, itself responsible for the websites of its presidency and the languages used thereon;
(b) Padomes parasti tajās izmantotā pieeja nevar būt galēji atšķirīga no ES iestādēs un to struktūrvienībās īstenotās vienotās pieejas;
(b) the practices followed in the Council cannot be pursued in a way which is completely isolated from uniform implementation by the institutions and their formations;
(c) informāciju šajās tīmekļa vietnēs ideālā variantā vajadzētu padarīt savlaicīgi pieejamu visās Kopienas oficiālajās valodās;
(c) the information on these websites should, ideally, be made available in good time in all official languages of the Community;
(d) ja valodu skaits jāierobežo, izmantojamo valodu izvēle jāpamato ar objektivitātes, saprātīguma, pārredzamības un iespējamības kritērijiem;
(d) if the number of languages is to be limited, the choice of the languages to be used must be based on criteria of objectivity, reasonableness, transparency and manageability;
(e) Padomes atteikšanās apsvērt sūdzības iesniedzēja lūgumu pēc būtības ir administratīva kļūme;
(e) the Council’s refusal to address the substance of the complainant’s request constitutes an instance of maladministration;