natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jaunās dalībvalstis , nomaļie reģioni un salu reģioni
Νew Member States and remote and island regions
Remote regions such as the Aegean islands face objective difficulties in setting up organisational structures.
Remote regions such as the Aegean islands face objective difficulties in setting up organisational structures.
These regions also face supply-related problems and it is also important to maintain a certain level of production to enable them to meet their food needs.
These regions also face supply-related problems and it is also important to maintain a certain level of production to enable them to meet their food needs.
Given that producer organisations are the corner stone of the COM, these regions should be given differential treatment in respect of the general recognition rules applicable to other EU-15 regions.
Given that producer organisations are the corner stone of the COM, these regions should be given differential treatment in respect of the general recognition rules applicable to other EU-15 regions.
Ražotāju organizācijām dalībvalstīs, kas Kopienai pievienojušā 2004. gadā vai vēlāk, uz laiku līdz pieciem gadiem var piešķirt pārejas periodu, kura laikā tām jāpanāk atbilstība 4. panta noteikumiem par atzīšanu.
Producer organisations in Member States which acceded to the Community in 2004 or thereafter may be allowed a transitional period of no more than five years in which to meet the conditions for recognition laid down in Article 4.
Ražotāju organizācijām dalībvalstīs, kas Kopienai pievienojušā 2004. gadā vai vēlāk, kā arī Egejas jūras salās (Regula ...) uz laiku līdz pieciem gadiem var piešķirt pārejas periodu, kura laikā tām jāpanāk atbilstība 4. panta nosacījumiem par atzīšanu.
Producer organisations in Member States which acceded to the Community in 2004 or thereafter and those in the Aegean islands (Regulation ...) may be allowed a transitional period of no more than five years in which to meet the conditions for recognition laid down in Article 4.
Atzīšanas plāna finansējums
Financing of the recognition plans
Atbalstu, kas paredzēts 6. panta 2. punkta a) apakšpunktā, piešķir pēc vienotas likmes.
The aid referred to under Article 6(2a) shall be granted on a flat-rate basis.
Minētā atbalsta summu nosaka atkarībā no katras ražotāju organizācijas gadā pārdotās produkcijas vērtības, un tā:
The amount of that aid shall be determined, for each producer organisation, on the basis of the value of its marketed production, and shall be equal to:
a) pirmajā, otrajā, trešajā, ceturtajā un piektajā gadā attiecīgi veido līdz 10 %, 10 %, 8 %, 6 % un 4 % no pārdotās produkcijas vērtības, ja tā nepārsniedz EUR 2 000 000, un
(a) in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years, 10%, 10%, 8%, 6% and 4% respectively of the value of the marketed production up to a maximum of EUR 2 000 000, and:
b) pirmajā, otrajā, trešajā, ceturtajā un piektajā gadā attiecīgi veido līdz 5 %, 5 %, 4 %, 3 % un 3 % no pārdotās produkcijas vērtības, ja tā pārsniedz EUR 2 000 000.
(b) in the first, second, third, fourth and fifth years, 5%, 5%, 4%, 3% and 3% respectively of the value of the marketed production in excess of EUR 2 000 000.
Komisija savos piemērošanas noteikumos nosaka vienai ražotāju organizācijai piešķiramā atbalsta maksimāli pieņemamo apjomu un maksāšanas kārtību.
The Commission shall determine, in its implementing rules, the maximum limits on aid per producer organisation, as well as the payment methods.
Šajā pantā precizēti 6. panta noteikumi, ņemot vērā, ka attiecināmās izmaksas jau tagad atspoguļojas ierobežojumos, kas noteikti finanšu pārskatā pozīcijā „Ražotāju organizāciju iepriekšēja atzīšana” (30–40 miljoni eiro gadā).
This article fleshes out the provisions of Article 6: the chargeable expenditure is already reflected in the limits laid down in the financial statement, under the heading ‘prior recognition of producer organisations’ (EUR 30 - 40 m per annum).
Tādēļ patlaban Komisijas regulas (EK) Nr. 1943/2003 3. pantā minētās atbalsta summas ir divkāršotas.
There is thus a duplication of the amounts of aid currently laid down in Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1943/2003.
Ņemot vērā šī panta nozīmi un vajadzību nodrošināt pārredzamību, lietderīgāk būtu šo pantu iekļaut Padomes pamatregulā, nevis Komisijas piemērošanas noteikumos, kuros galvenā uzmanība vērsta tikai uz administratīviem aspektiem.
In view of its importance and on grounds of visibility, it appears preferable to incorporate this article in the basic Council regulation, rather than leaving it for the Commission’s implementing rules, which are of a strictly administrative nature.
a) biedru vai pašu ražotāju organizāciju finansiāliem ieguldījumiem;
(a) financial contributions of members or the producer organisation itself;
a) biedru vai pašu ražotāju organizāciju finansiāliem ieguldījumiem; pēdējā gadījumā dalībvalstis var noteikt ražotāju organizācijas ieguldījumu izcelsmi;
(a) financial contributions of members or the producer organisation itself ; in the latter case, the funds contributed by the producer organisation may have their origins decided by the Member States ;
Nedrīkst ierobežot ražotāju organizāciju ieguldījumu izcelsmi, zinot, ka patlaban šī izcelsme var būt vienīgi pašu resursi un, jo īpaši, savas produkcijas pārdošana.
The origins of the producer organisations’ contributions should not be restricted, given that at present they can only come from their own resources and, in particular, from the producers’ income from sales.
Šādā situācijā, ja ražotāju organizācijām nodrošināmiem pakalpojumiem, kā sagaidāms, būs tendence nākotnē palielināties, grāmatvedības un finanšu vadība kļūs padziļinātāka, ja līdzekļiem būs dažāda veida izcelsme.
In these circumstances, if, as is hoped, the services provided by the POs tend to increase in the future, the accounting and financial management will become more complex as funds of very diverse kinds are generated.
Visbeidzot, ar līdzekļu izcelsmes noteikšanu saistīts papildu sarežģījums no grāmatvedības viedokļa praksē kavē ražotāju organizāciju ieguldījumu faktisko iemaksu veikšanu.
Finally, the added difficulty arising from identifying the origin of the funds from an accounting viewpoint is a practical obstacle to the POs actually making their contributions.
Pieredze apliecina, ka, lai arī spēkā esošie noteikumi pieļauj līdzekļu diversifikāciju, šī iespēja praksē netiek īstenota pastāvošo ierobežojumu dēļ.
Experience confirms this, since, even if the existing rules permit the diversification of funds, this option has scarcely been applied in practice thanks to the restrictions in force.
Darbības fondus var izmantot darbības programmu finansēšanai, kuras dalībvalstis apstiprina saskaņā ar 12. pantu.
Operational funds shall be used to finance operational programmes approved by Member States in accordance with Article 12.
Darbības fondus var izmantot darbības programmu finansēšanai, kuras dalībvalstis apstiprina saskaņā ar 12. pantu , un drošības fonda finansēšanai saskaņā ar 12.a pantu .
Operational funds shall be used to finance operational programmes approved by Member States in accordance with Article 12 and to finance the Security Fund pursuant to Article 12a .
Ir vajadzīgs noteikums par krīžu novēršanu un vadību ne tikai attiecībā uz darbības programmām, lai varētu nodrošināt šī fonda daudzgadu pārvaldi.
An instrument is needed to prevent and manage crises outside the operational programmes to make it possible to manage this fund multiannually.
ba) patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības pasākumu veicināšana;
(ba) promotion of consumer protection measures,
ea) izcelsmes apzīmējumu un ģeogrāfiskās izcelsmes norāžu popularizēšana;
(ea) promotion of designations of origin and geographical indications,
eb) vajadzības gadījumā piedāvājuma un pieprasījuma labāka pielāgošana pārstrukturēšanas programmas īstenošanai;
(eb) better adjustment of supply to demand, with the introduction of restructuring programmes if necessary;
Improving quality and marketing should sometimes be accompanied by better adjustment of supply to demand.
Improving quality and marketing should sometimes be accompanied by better adjustment of supply to demand.
f) krīžu situāciju vadība.
(f) crisis management.
fa) tādu pasākumu pieņemšana, kuri paredzēti produktu pārstādei, lai tos izmantotu kā biomasas degvielu.
(fa) the adoption of measures geared to processing products for use as biofuel.
The search for new market outlets could figure among the measures promoted under the operational programmes.
The search for new market outlets could figure among the measures promoted under the operational programmes.
Darbības programmu mērķiem ir pievienoti apmācības pasākumi, jo tos neuzskata par tirgus krīžu vadības instrumentu.
Training measures are added to the objectives of the operational programmes, since they are not a tool for market crisis management.
fd) ražas apdrošināšana.
(fc) harvest insurance.
Šis ir priekšlikums iekļaut starp galvenajiem mērķiem ražas apdrošināšanu, jo šis mērķis nav tieši saistīts vienīgi ar tirgus krīžu vadību un attiecas arī uz citiem riskiem.
The general objectives should include the creation of harvest insurance schemes, since this objective does not exclusively concern ‘market’ crisis management but covers other risks.
Krīžu vadība jāsaista ar krīžu novēršanu augļu un dārzeņu tirgū, un rīcību šādas krīzes situācijās, un pie tās šādā kontekstā pieder:
Crisis management shall be related to avoiding and dealing with crises on the fruit and vegetable markets and shall cover in this context:
a) izņemšana no tirgus,
(a) market withdrawals,
b) nenogatavojušos augļu un dārzeņu novākšana, vai ražas nenovākšana,
(b) green harvesting or non-harvesting of fruit and vegetables,
c) informācija un komunikācija,
(c) promotion and communication,
d) mācību pasākumi,
(d) training measures,
e) ražas apdrošināšana,
(e) harvest insurance,
f) atbalsts savstarpējā atbalsta fondu administratīvo izmaksu segšanai.
(f) support for the administrative costs of setting up mutual funds.
The architecture of operational programmes was designed to accommodate measures to structurally reinforce the economic organisation of the industry.
The architecture of operational programmes was designed to accommodate measures to structurally reinforce the economic organisation of the industry.
The current annual programming procedure is incompatible with the prevention and management of crises, necessitating responsiveness and placing of funds in reserve during favourable seasons.
The current annual programming procedure is incompatible with the prevention and management of crises, necessitating responsiveness and placing of funds in reserve during favourable seasons.
Accordingly, a crisis prevention and management instrument absolutely must be established as part of the COM in fruit and vegetables outside the operational programmes to permit the multiannual management of that fund.
Accordingly, a crisis prevention and management instrument absolutely must be established as part of the COM in fruit and vegetables outside the operational programmes to permit the multiannual management of that fund.
Finanšu ieguldījumus, kas palielina vides noslodzi, ir atļauts izdarīt tikai tad, kad ir veikti iedarbīgi aizsargpasākumi vides aizsardzībai pret tai šādi radušos slodzi.
Investments which increase environmental pressure shall only be permitted in situations where effective safeguards to protect the environment from these pressures are in place.
Nav nepieciešams paredzēt šādu nosacījumu, jo attiecībā uz ieguldījumiem darbības programmās tas ir pārmērīgs.
It is not desirable to include such an obligation, which appears excessive for investments in the operational programmes.
Darbības programmās iekļauj vietēja, reģionāla un valsts līmeņa pasākumus augļu un dārzeņu patēriņa veicināšanai jaunatnes vidū.
Operational programmes shall include action to promote the consumption of fruit and vegetables targeted at young consumers at local, regional or national level.
Saskaņā ar iepriekšējiem grozījumiem dalībvalstīm ir brīva izvēle noteikt darbības fondu prioritātes.
In line with the rapporteur’s earlier amendments, Member States should be allowed to determine the priorities of the operational funds.
Kopienas finansiālā palīdzība ir vienāda ar biedru ražotāju faktiskajām finanšu iemaksām, bet ne lielāka par 50% no faktiskajām izmaksām.
The Community financial assistance shall be equal to the amount of the financial contributions of member producers as actually paid but limited to 50% of the actual expenditure incurred.
Kopienas finansiālā palīdzība ir vienāda ar biedru ražotāju faktiskajām finanšu iemaksām, bet ne lielāka par 50% no faktiskajām izmaksām saistībā ar darbības programmām un saskaņā ar 12.a panta 2. punktā drošības fondam paredzēto procedūru .
The Community financial assistance shall be equal to the amount of the financial contributions of member producers as actually paid but limited to 50% of the actual expenditure incurred for operational programmes in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 12a(2) for the Security Fund .
The cost of crisis management measures must not be deducted from the funding for structural measures provided for in operational programmes.
The cost of crisis management measures must not be deducted from the funding for structural measures provided for in operational programmes.
The crisis prevention and management fund must be independent of the operational programmes and must be financed from different, complementary budgetary resources.
The crisis prevention and management fund must be independent of the operational programmes and must be financed from different, complementary budgetary resources.
Kopienas finansiālās palīdzības maksimālā vērtība nedrīkst pārsniegt 4,1 % no attiecīgās ražotāju organizācijas pārdotās produkcijas vērtības.
The Community financial assistance shall be capped at 4.1% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation.
Kopienas finansiālās palīdzības maksimālā vērtība nedrīkst pārsniegt 6 % no attiecīgās ražotāju organizācijas pārdotās produkcijas vērtības.
The Community financial assistance shall be capped at 6% of the value of the marketed production of each producer organisation.
Although the reform will require producer organisations to take on new burdensome tasks, the Community aid ceiling will be maintained at 4.1% of the value of the production marketed by each organisation.
Although the reform will require producer organisations to take on new burdensome tasks, the Community aid ceiling will be maintained at 4.1% of the value of the production marketed by each organisation.
This will result in a reduction in the financial resources available to producer organisations, whose expenditure capacity could suffer a 17% cut in the case of 60% funding as proposed by the Commission.
This will result in a reduction in the financial resources available to producer organisations, whose expenditure capacity could suffer a 17% cut in the case of 60% funding as proposed by the Commission.
The ceiling on Community aid should therefore be raised from 4.1% to 6% of the value of marketed production.
The ceiling on Community aid should therefore be raised from 4.1% to 6% of the value of marketed production.
Ja maksimāli pieļaujamais apjoms ir lielāks par 6 % no pārdotās produkcijas vērtības, papildus var sniegt Kopienas finansiālo palīdzību no Regulas (EK) Nr. 1782/2003 42. pantā paredzētās valsts rezerves, ja maksimāli pieļaujamais apjoms nepārsniedz 0,5 % no katrai dalībvalstij piešķirtās pamatsummas, tostarp no šīs regulas 12.a pantā minētā drošības fonda.
The Community financial aid may be supplemented by part of the national reserve referred to in Article 42 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, up to a maximum of 0.5% of the reference amounts allocated to each Member State, including the Security Fund mentioned in Article 12a of this Regulation.
Dalībvalstis informē Komisiju par savām interesēm attiecībā uz šo finansējuma fakultatīvo iespēju un ņem to vērā 11. pantā minēto valsts stratēģiju izstrādē.
Member States shall inform the Commission of their interest in this optional funding possibility, and shall take it into account when determining their national strategies as referred to in Article 11.
Lai ievērotu budžeta neitralitātes principu priekšlikumā, dalībvalstis var izmantot Regulā (EK) Nr. 1782/2003 minētās valsts rezerves saistībā ar tiesībām uz maksājumu, ja šīs valstis uzskata, ka darbības fondiem piešķirtie līdzekļi ir nepietiekami.
In order to ensure that the proposal observes the principle of budgetary neutrality, Member States may have the option of resorting to the national payment reserve under Article 42 of Regulation (EC) 1782/2003, should the resources allocated to the operational funds be found insufficient.
Tādēļ no rezerves, nepārsniedzot vispārējo maksimāli pieļaujamo apjomu 0,5 % apmērā, var segt papildu izmaksas, ko rada darbības fondu maksimāli pieļaujamā apjoma palielināšana vai atkarībā no apstākļiem drošības fonda izveidošana no valsts puses.
Any additional expenditure generated by the increases in the ceilings for the operational funds or, where relevant, the creation by a Member State of a Security Fund, may, accordingly, draw on the reserve up to an overall limit of 0.5%.
Tomēr finansiālās palīdzības ierobežošanu nepiemēro, ja radušos izdevumu apmēru palielina līdz 60 %, kā paredzēts šā panta 2. punktā.
However, the limitation of financial assistance shall not apply where the percentage of the expenditure incurred is increased to 60%, as provided for in paragraph 2 below.
If the Community co-financing increase to 60% were to be capped, producer organisations would, in order to ensure that aid for some schemes at 60% was effective, need to abandon the implementation of some of the 50%-rate schemes contained in their operational programmes or increase their own contribution to these schemes to above 50%.
If the Community co-financing increase to 60% were to be capped, producer organisations would, in order to ensure that aid for some schemes at 60% was effective, need to abandon the implementation of some of the 50%-rate schemes contained in their operational programmes or increase their own contribution to these schemes to above 50%.
This would not be legally compatible with the provision which guarantees producer organisations a minimum reimbursement of 50%.
This would not be legally compatible with the provision which guarantees producer organisations a minimum reimbursement of 50%.
a) to iesniegušas vairākas Kopienas ražotāju organizācijas, kas darbojas dažādās dalībvalstīs pēc starptautiskām programmām;
(a) it is submitted by several Community producer organisations operating in different Member States on transnational schemes;
a) to iesniegušas vairākas Kopienas ražotāju organizācijas, kas darbojas pēc kopīgām programmām vai dažādās dalībvalstīs pēc starptautiskām programmām;
(a) it is submitted by several Community producer organisations operating on joint schemes or, in different Member States, on transnational schemes;
The mechanism put forward to provide 60% funding for such operational programmes or part of such programmes while maintaining the Community aid ceiling at 4.1% is inconsistent with the proposed objective of providing an incentive, in that it entails a reduction in the expenditure capacity of the producer organisations of around 17% (from 8.2% to 6.83% = -1.37% VPC).
The mechanism put forward to provide 60% funding for such operational programmes or part of such programmes while maintaining the Community aid ceiling at 4.1% is inconsistent with the proposed objective of providing an incentive, in that it entails a reduction in the expenditure capacity of the producer organisations of around 17% (from 8.2% to 6.83% = -1.37% VPC).
The range of schemes which may be funded at 60% under Article 9(2) should be extended by incorporating into letter (a) joint schemes carried out by two or more producer organisations.
The range of schemes which may be funded at 60% under Article 9(2) should be extended by incorporating into letter (a) joint schemes carried out by two or more producer organisations.
c) tā attiecas tikai uz īpašu atbalstu organiskās lauksaimniecības produktu ražošanai, uz kuru attiecas Padomes Regula (EK) Nr. 2092/91;
(c) it covers solely specific support for the production of organic products covered by Council Regulation (EC) No 2092/91;
Ir jāpaplašina to pasākumu loks, kurus finansē 60 % apmērā, iekļaujot pasākumus, lai veicinātu videi nekaitīgu paņēmienu izmantošanu.
The range of schemes which may be funded at 60% should be extended so as to include schemes to promote the use of environment-friendly techniques.
f) to ir iesniegušas ražotāju organizācijas dalībvalstīs, kurās ražotāju organizācijas pārdod mazāk nekā 20% augļu un dārzeņu produkcijas;
(f) it is submitted by producer organisations in Member States where producer organisations market less than 20% of fruit and vegetables production;
f) to ir iesniegušas ražotāju organizācijas dalībvalstīs, kurās ražotāju organizācijas pārdod mazāk nekā 20% augļu un dārzeņu produkcijas , vai ražotāju organizācijas, kas darbojas reģionā, kurā ražotāju organizācijas tirgo mazāk nekā 20 % no augļu un dārzeņu produkcijas, vai ražotāju organizācijas, kas ir atzītas pirms šīs direktīvas stāšanās spēkā, un šo organizāciju tirgotās produkcijas vērtība vairāk nkeā 50 % apmērā nāk no atbalsta pārstrādes produktiem saskaņā ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 2201/96 un Regulu (EK) Nr. 2202/96 ;
(f) it is submitted by producer organisations in Member States where producer organisations market less than 20% of fruit and vegetables production , or by producer organisations operating in regions in which less than 20% of fruit and vegetable production is marketed by producer organisations, or by producer organisations recognised before the entry into force of this regulation, over 50% of whose marketed production value comes from aid for processed products under Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 and Regulation (EC) No 2202/96 ;
Ir jāpaplašina to programmu piemērošanas joma, kuras finansē 60 % apmērā, lai veicinātu apvienošanos asociācijās vismaz tajos reģionos vai tajās dalīvalstīs, kurās ražotāju organizācijām nav pietiekami lielas tirgus daļas.
The list of programmes that may be funded at a rate of 60% should be extended to stimulate the formation of associations, at least in regions or Member States where producer organisations do not have sufficient shares of the market.
ga) to ir iesniegusi tāda ražotāju organizācija, kas ir atzīta saistībā ar kādu produktu, kuram ir zems iesaistīšanās līmenis;
(ga) it is submitted by a recognised producer organisation for a product for which there is a weak associative movement;
gb) to ir iesniegusi tāda ražotāju organizācija, kas ir atzīta saistībā ar produktiem, kuriem ir nozīmīga loma vietējā vai reģionālajā ekonomikā vai ekoloģijā un kurus ilgstoši ir grūti realizēt Kopienas tirgū spēcīgas starptautiskas konkurences dēļ;
(gb) it is submitted by a recognised producer organisation for a product of major economic or ecological importance, local or regional, which encounters permanent difficulties on the Community market, owing in particular to international competition;
Ir jāveicina tādu ražotāju organizāciju darbība, kuru produkcija ir pakļauta lielai ārējai konkurencei.
It is necessary to promote the actions of producer organisations whose products are subjected to high levels of outside competition.
Regulā (EK) Nr. 2200/96 bija paredzēta iespēja veikt īpašus pasākumus attiecībā uz šādiem produktiem (17. pants), bet šo iespēju svītroja izskatāmajā priekšlikumā.
Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 included the possibility of adopting specific measures for those products (Article 17): the proposal as it stands eliminates them.
gc) to ir iesniegusi atzīta ražotāju organizācija.
(gc) it is submitted by an association of recognised producer organisations.
The range of schemes which may be funded at 60% under Article 9(2) should be extended by adding a letter (h) for programmes submitted by an association of recognised producer organisations.
The range of schemes which may be funded at 60% under Article 9(2) should be extended by adding a letter (h) for programmes submitted by an association of recognised producer organisations.