natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tās profesijas, kuru tiesiskais statuss pakalpojuma nodrošināšanu pieprasa obligātā kārtā, līdz brīdim, kad tiek oficiāli paziņota to nelikumība, ir atbrīvotas no prasības šo pakalpojumu apturēt.
Those professions the legal status of which makes the provision of the service in question obligatory, up to the limits of manifest illegality, shall be exempt from the requirement to refrain therefrom.
25. panta 1. punkts
Article 25, paragraph 1
Institūcijas un personas, kuras pakļautas direktīvai, kā arī to vadītāji un darbinieki nedrīkst izpaust nedz ieinteresētajam klientam, nedz kādai citai trešai pusei, ka informācija ir nodota finansiālās izmeklēšanas vienībai, saskaņā ar 19., 20. un 21. pantiem, vai, ka tiek veikta, vai var tikt veikta izmeklēšana par nelegāli iegūto līdzekļu legalizēšanu.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive and their directors and employees shall not disclose to the customer concerned nor to other third persons that information has been transmitted to the financial intelligence unit in accordance with Articles 19, 20 and 21 or that a money laundering investigation is being or may be carried out.
Iestādes un personas, kam saistoša šī direktīva, un to vadītāji un darbinieki, neskaitot neatkarīgos profesionālos juristus, kas ir saistīti ar juridiskās konsultācijas sniegšanu klientam vai jebkurai citai personai, kas ir saistīta ar vai vēro tiesvedību, nedrīkst atklāt attiecīgajiem klientiem vai arī citām trešajām personām, ka informācija saskaņā ar 19., 20. un 21. pantu tikusi pārsūtīta finanšu izmeklēšanas vienībai vai, ka notiek vai tiks veikta izmeklēšana par nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive and their directors and employees , not including independent legal professionals in connection with the giving of legal advice to a client or to any person in connection with or in contemplation of legal proceedings, shall not disclose to the customer concerned nor to other third persons that information has been transmitted to the financial intelligence unit in accordance with Articles 19, 20 and 21 or that a money laundering investigation is being or may be carried out.
Neizpaušanas prasība netiek piemērots, ja persona vai iestāde, uz ko attiecas šī direktīva, saskaņā ar valsts likumdošanu, ir saistīta ar īpašu izpaušanas prasību.
The non-disclosure obligation shall not be applied when a person or institution subject to this Directive is charged with specific disclosure obligations under national legislation.
Dalībvalstis nodrošina, ka tiek publicēts konsolidēts šo statistisko ziņojumu pārskats.
Member States shall ensure that a consolidated review of these statistical reports is published.
Ņemot vērā tehnisko līdzekļu attīstību, lai cīnītos pret nelegāli iegūto līdzekļu legalizēšanu, un, lai nodrošinātu šīs direktīvas vienotu piemērošanu, Komisija, saskaņā ar procedūru, uz kuru veikta atsauce 38. panta 2. punktā, pieņems sekojošus piemērošanas pasākumus:
In order to take account of technical developments in the fight against money laundering and to ensure uniform application of this Directive, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 38(2), adopt the following implementing measures:
Lai cīņā pret nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu un teroristu finansēšanu ņemtu vērā tehnoloģiskos sasniegumus un nodrošinātu vienotu direktīvas piemērošanu, Komisija, saskaņā ar 38. panta 2. punktā minētajām procedūrām, pieņem sekojošus īstenošanas pasākumus:
In order to take account of technical developments in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and to ensure uniform application of this Directive, the Commission shall, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 38(2), adopt the following implementing measures:
37. panta 1. punkta a) apakšpunkts
Article 37, paragraph 1, point (a)
a) 1definīciju, kuras ietvertas 1. panta 2. punktā un 3. panta 2. punkta a) un d) daļās, 5., 8., 9., 10., 11., un 12. pantos, tehnisko aspektu noskaidrošana;
(a) clarification of the technical aspects of the definitions in Article 1(2 ) and in Article 3(2)(a) and (d), (5), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12);
a) 1. panta 2. punktā un 2a pantā , 3. panta 2. punkta a) un d) apakšpunktos un 5., 8., 9., 10., 11. un 12. punktā minēto tehnisko aspektu definīciju precizēšana
(a) clarification of the technical aspects of the definitions in Article 1(2) and 2a and in Article 3(2)(a) and (d), (5), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12);
38. panta 1. punkts
Article 38, paragraph 1
Komisiju atbalstīs Nelegāli iegūto līdzekļu legalizēšanas novēršanas komiteja, turpmāk “komiteja”.
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering, hereinafter “the Committee”.
Nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanas novēršanas komiteja, turpmāk “komiteja”, sniedz palīdzību Komisijai; šī komiteja kopā ar Komisiju sniedz ikgadēju ziņojumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei par savu darbību un iecerēm.
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee on the Prevention of Money Laundering, hereinafter “the Committee” , which Committee shall, together with the Commission, deliver an annual report on its activities and deliberations to the European Parliament and to the Council .
Trīs gadu laikā no šīs direktīvas stāšanās spēkā un vismaz trīs ikgadējos starplaikos pēc tam, Komisija sniegs ziņojumu par šīs direktīvas īstenošanu un iesniegs to Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei.
Within three years of the entry into force of this Directive, and at least at three yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Directive and submit it to the European Parliament and the Council.
Ziņojums pārsvarā attiecas uz jomām, kas jāpārskata, kā tas noteikts direktīvas 2001/97/EK 2. pantā.
The report shall relate, in particular, to the fields to be reviewed as laid down in Article 2 of Directive 2001/97/EC.
LŪGUMRAKSTU KOMITEJAS ATZINUMS
OPINIONOF THE COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS
Pilsoņ brīvību, tieslietu un iekšlietu komitejai
for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Lūgumrakstu komiteja aicina par jautājumu atbldīgo Pilsoņu brīvību, tieslietu un iekšlietu komiteju savā ziņojumā iekļaut šādus grozījumus.
The Committee on Petitions calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(i) nekustama īpašuma vai saimnieciskas vienības pirkšanu un pārdošanu;
(i) buying and selling of real property or business entities;
(i) nekustama īpašuma vai saimnieciskas vienības pirkšanu un pārdošanu;
(ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;
(ii) klienta līdzekļu, vērtspapīru vai aktīvu pārvaldīšanu;
(iii) opening or management of bank, savings or securities accounts;
ii) klienta līdzekļu, vērtspapīru vai aktīvu pārvaldīšanu;
(iv) organisation of contributions necessary for the creation, operation or management of companies;
(iii) banku, uzkrājumu vai vērtspapīru kontu atklāšanu vai pārvaldīšanu;
(v) creation, operation or management of trust companies or similar structures;
iii) banku, uzkrājumu vai vērtspapīru kontu atklāšanu vai pārvaldīšanu;
(i) buying and selling of real property or business entities;
(iv) nepieciešamo ieguldījumu veikšanu, kas vajadzīgs kompāniju radīšanai, vadīšanai un pārvaldei;
(ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;
iv) nepieciešamo ieguldījumu veikšanu, kas vajadzīgs kompāniju radīšanai, vadīšanai un pārvaldei;
(iii) opening or management of bank, savings or securities accounts;
(v) trestu, kompāniju vai līdzīgu struktūru radīšanu, vadīšanu un pārvaldi;
(iv) organisation of contributions necessary for the creation, operation or management of companies;
(v) trestu, kompāniju vai līdzīgu struktūru radīšanu, vadīšanu un pārvaldi;
(v) creation, operation or management of trust companies or similar structures ,
ja no klientiem iegūtā informācija neattiecas uz darbībām, kas saistītas ar profesionālo noslēpumu.
provided that the information thus obtained from their clients does not relate to activities covered by professional confidentiality.
10. panta 3a. punkts (jauns)
Article 10, paragraph 3a (new)
Neatkarīgie juridiskās profesijas pārstāvji, kas iesaistīti īpašās darbībās, kas minētas 3. panta 12. a punktā, nekādā gadījumā nav pakļauti Direktīvas 6., 7. un 8. pantos uzskaitītajām saistībām, jo profesionālais noslēpums ir prioritārs attiecībā pret šādām saistībām.
In any event the specific activities engaged in by the independent legal professionals referred to in Article 3 12a) shall not be subject to the obligations laid down in Article 6, 7 and 8 of this Directive, in so far as the bond of professional confidentiality takes precedence over such obligations.
Dalībvalstis neuzliek par pienākumu notāriem, neatkarīgajiem juridisko profesiju pārstāvjiem, auditoriem, ārējiem grāmatvežiem un nodokļu konsultantiem piemērot noteikumus, kas izklāstīti 19. panta 1. punktā, attiecībā uz informāciju, kuru tie saņem vai iegūst par kādu no saviem klientiem, laikā, kad tie nosaka sava klienta noteiktu juridisko stāvokli vai veic tā uzdevumu, vai aizstāv, vai pārstāv šo klientu juridiskajās procedūrās, vai attiecībā uz juridiskajām procedūrām, ieskaitot konsultācijas par procedūru uzsākšanu vai izvairīšanos no tām, neatkarīgi no tā vai šī informācija ir iegūta vai saņemta pirms, pēc vai šādu procedūru laikā, vai arī arbitrāžas vai starpniecības procedūru laikā .
Member States shall not apply the obligations laid down in Article 19(1) to notaries, independent legal professionals, auditors, external accountants and tax advisors with regard to information they receive from or obtain on one of their clients, in the course of ascertaining the legal position for their client or performing their task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning judicial proceedings, including advice on instituting or avoiding proceedings, whether such information is received or obtained before, during or after such proceedings, or within the framework of arbitration or mediation procedures.
20.panta 2.punkta 1a. daļa (jauna)
Article 20, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1a (new)
Juridiskās konsultācijas, kas nav nepārprotamā veidā saistītas ar naudas atmazgāšanu, ir pakļautas tikai profesionālā noslēpuma saistībām.
In any event, legal advice - which is not provided within an unmistakable context of money laundering - shall be subject solely to the bond of professional confidentiality.
21. panta 3a. daļa (jauna)
Article 21, paragraph 3 (new)
Tā kā neatkarīgie juridiskās profesijās pārstāvji ir pakļauti profesionālā noslēpuma saistībām, uz viņiem neattiecina iepriekšējā punktā minētos nosacījumus.
In so far as independent legal professionals are subject to the bond of professional confidentiality, they shall not be covered by the provisions of the third paragraph.
25. panta 2. daļa
Article 25, second paragraph
Ja neatkarīgie juridiskie profesionāļi, notāri, auditori, grāmatveži un nodokļu konsultanti, darbojoties kā neatkarīgi juridiskie profesionāļi mēģina atrunāt klientu no iesaistīšanās nelegālajā darbībā, tas nav uzskatāms par izpaušanu pirmā punkta nozīmē .
Where independent legal professionals, notaries, auditors, accountants and tax advisors, acting as independent legal professionals seek to dissuade a client from engaging in illegal activity, this shall not constitute a disclosure within the meaning of the first paragraph.
Šī punkta pirmajā daļā minētajā minētie aizliegumi neattiecas uz juridiskās profesijas pārstāvju darbībām, kurās prioritāras ir profesionālā noslēpuma saistības.
The prohibition laid down in the above paragraph shall not apply to those activities of legal professionals in which the bond of professional confidentiality takes precedence.
Divu gadu laikā pēc šīs direktīvas stāšanās spēkā un jebkurā gadījumā, pirms stājas spēkā līgums par Eiropas Konstitūciju, un vismaz trīs gadus pēc tam Komisija sniegs ziņojumu par šīs direktīvas īstenošanu, it īpaši attiecībā uz noteikumiem saistībā ar profesionālo noslēpumu, kas attiecas uz juristiem un neatkarīgajiem juridiskās profesijas pārstāvjiem, un iesniegs to Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei.
Within two years of the entry into force of this Directive - and, in any event, before the Treaty adopting a Constitution for Europe comes into force - and at least at three yearly intervals thereafter, the Commission shall draw up a report on the implementation of this Directive (with particular reference to the way in which the professional confidentiality of lawyers and other independent legal professionals is treated) and submit it to the European Parliament and the Council.
Komiteja, kurai lūgts sniegt atzinumu Datums, kad paziņoja plenārsēdē
Committee asked for opinion Date announced in plenary
Referents, kas atbildīgs par atzinumu Iecelšanas datums
Draftswoman Date appointed
Grozījumu pieņemšanas datums
Date adopted
EK līguma 47. panta 2. punkts un 95. pants
47(2) and 95 EC
Datums, kad iesniedza Parlamentam
Date submitted to Parliament
PE 355.666v01-00
PE 355.666v03-00
– ņemot vērā Luksemburgas Lielhercogistes iniciatīvu (5429/2005)
– having regard to the initiative of Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (5429/2005)
– ņemot vērā Padomes 1998. gada 3. decembra akta 44. pantu, ar ko nosaka personāla noteikumus, kas piemērojami Eiropola darbiniekiem (turpmāk – “personāla noteikumi”),
– having regard to Article 44 of the Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees (hereinafter referred to as the ‘staff regulations’),
– ņemot vērā Līguma par Eiropas Savienību 39. panta 1. punktu, saskaņā ar ko Padome konsultēja Parlamentu ( C6‑0037/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0037/2005 ),
– ņemot vērā tā Reglamenta 93. un 51. pantu,
– having regard to Rules 93 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ņemot vērā Komisijas paziņojumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei – Demokrātiska Eiropola kontrole ( KOM(2002)0095 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the European Parliament and the Council - Democratic Control over Europol ( COM(2002)0095 ),
- ņemot vērā tā 2002. gada 30. maija ieteikumu Padomei par Eiropola turpmāko attīstību un tā automātisko iekļaušanu Eiropas Savienības institucionālajā sistēmā
− having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 30 May 2002 on the future development of Europol and its automatic incorporation into the institutional system of the European Union
Pieņemtie teksti, P5_TA(2002)0269 . ,
Texts Adopted, P5_TA(2002)0269 . ,
– ņemot vērā tā 2003. gada 10. aprīļa ieteikumu Padomei par Eiropola turpmāko attīstību
– having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 10 April 2003 on the future development of Europol
– ņemot vērā Pilsoņu brīvību, tieslietu un iekšlietu komitejas ziņojumu (A6‑0000/2005),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0139/2005 ),
A. tā kā Parlaments nav informēts un ar to nav notikušas konsultācijas par darbības un organizatoriskiem pasākumiem attiecībā uz Eiropolu vai tā pašreizējām aktivitātēm un turpmākām programmām saistībā ar ES un dalībvalstu vajadzībām; tā kā informācijas trūkuma dēļ Parlamentam nav iespējams novērtēt ierosinātā lēmuma atbilstību un piemērotību;
A. whereas Parliament has not been consulted on, or informed of, any of the operational and organisational measures concerning Europol, or Europol’s current activities and future programmes in response to the needs of the EU and the Member States; whereas this lack of information makes it impossible for Parliament to assess the relevance and adequacy of the proposed decision;
Like his predecessors your rapporteur believes that this proposal needs to be assessed in the more general context of the latest developments concerning Europol, and in particular, checking whether the European Parliament’s repeated requests on the requisite democratic control of Europol and on data protection and access to documents are being satisfied by the Council or not.
Like his predecessors your rapporteur believes that this proposal needs to be assessed in the more general context of the latest developments concerning Europol, and in particular, checking whether the European Parliament’s repeated requests on the requisite democratic control of Europol and on data protection and access to documents are being satisfied by the Council or not.
Council Act of 27 November 2003 drawing up, on the basis of Article 43(1) of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), a Protocol amending that Convention Official Journal C 002 , 06/01/2004 P. 0001 - 0012 and containing a series of amendments principally designed to increase Europol’s powers and operating capacity, as well as certain rules concerning improved supply of information to the EP and consultation of that institution with regard to Europol’s activities.
Council Act of 27 November 2003 drawing up, on the basis of Article 43(1) of the Convention on the Establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention), a Protocol amending that Convention Official Journal C 002 , 06/01/2004 P. 0001 - 0012 and containing a series of amendments principally designed to increase Europol’s powers and operating capacity, as well as certain rules concerning improved supply of information to the EP and consultation of that institution with regard to Europol’s activities.
The protocol only partially addressed these issues
The protocol only partially addressed these issues
New article 34 ‘Informing the European Parliament’ (point 8.2 of the Protocol) states: ‘The Presidency of the Council or its representative may appear before the European Parliament with a view to discuss general questions relating to Europol.
New article 34 ‘Informing the European Parliament’ (point 8.2 of the Protocol) states: ‘The Presidency of the Council or its representative may appear before the European Parliament with a view to discuss general questions relating to Europol.
The Presidency of the Council or its representative shall, with respect to the European Parliament, take into account the obligations of discretion and confidentiality’. but it did not meet other expectations:
The Presidency of the Council or its representative shall, with respect to the European Parliament, take into account the obligations of discretion and confidentiality’. but it did not meet other expectations:
The problem of protecting privacy and personal data has become chronic in the third pillar, particularly regarding exchange of data (whether personal or not) with third countries (i.e. the United States) and with European institutions or bodies (such as the draft agreement between Europol and Eurojust).
The problem of protecting privacy and personal data has become chronic in the third pillar, particularly regarding exchange of data (whether personal or not) with third countries (i.e. the United States) and with European institutions or bodies (such as the draft agreement between Europol and Eurojust).
Your rapporteur welcomes the approach of the Joint Supervisory Body aimed at ‘examining all the agreements that Europol has drawn up with third states and bodies and scrutinising orders to open analysis files’ as well as its commitment to ‘ensure that data protection concerns are taken into account when new initiatives involving Europol are being drawn up’
Your rapporteur welcomes the approach of the Joint Supervisory Body aimed at ‘examining all the agreements that Europol has drawn up with third states and bodies and scrutinising orders to open analysis files’ as well as its commitment to ‘ensure that data protection concerns are taken into account when new initiatives involving Europol are being drawn up’
‘The European Council urges the Member States to enable Europol in cooperation with Eurojust to play a key role in the fight against serious cross-border (organised) crime and terrorism by:
‘The European Council urges the Member States to enable Europol in cooperation with Eurojust to play a key role in the fight against serious cross-border (organised) crime and terrorism by:
· encouraging good cooperation between their competent national authorities and Europol.’
· encouraging good cooperation between their competent national authorities and Europol.’
In particular, several Member States have not yet ratified the protocol strengthening Europol’s operational support function with respect to national police authorities
In particular, several Member States have not yet ratified the protocol strengthening Europol’s operational support function with respect to national police authorities
The Member States’ contradictory attitude is nothing less than astonishing.
The Member States’ contradictory attitude is nothing less than astonishing.
On the one hand, they maintain they wish to call on Europol for, among other things, operations involving national police services.
On the one hand, they maintain they wish to call on Europol for, among other things, operations involving national police services.
On the other hand, however, they have not established an appropriate legal basis for Europol, even though Eurojust operates under Article 30 of the Treaty on European Union (this solution has been advocated by Parliament for years, and, since 2002, by the Council’s legal service).
On the other hand, however, they have not established an appropriate legal basis for Europol, even though Eurojust operates under Article 30 of the Treaty on European Union (this solution has been advocated by Parliament for years, and, since 2002, by the Council’s legal service).
The JSB activity report refers in diplomatic terms to the lack of democratic control: ‘There is also the wider issue of parliamentary scrutiny of Europol.
The JSB activity report refers in diplomatic terms to the lack of democratic control: ‘There is also the wider issue of parliamentary scrutiny of Europol.
In 2002 the Commission came to the conclusion that the existing controls in place to supervise the work of Europol - exercised by national parliaments, the European Parliament, national data protection authorities, the JSB and the Europol Management Board - were not ‘insufficient’.
In 2002 the Commission came to the conclusion that the existing controls in place to supervise the work of Europol - exercised by national parliaments, the European Parliament, national data protection authorities, the JSB and the Europol Management Board - were not ‘insufficient’.
It was noted, however, that the indirect and fragmented nature of much of this control would suggest that ‘something clearer and more transparent is needed’.
It was noted, however, that the indirect and fragmented nature of much of this control would suggest that ‘something clearer and more transparent is needed’.
Such issues fall outside the remit of the JSB but it is clear that as Europol’s tasks become increasingly operational, control and scrutiny of Europol’s work will have to adapt to take account of this’
Such issues fall outside the remit of the JSB but it is clear that as Europol’s tasks become increasingly operational, control and scrutiny of Europol’s work will have to adapt to take account of this’
Europol’s mission shall be to support and strengthen action by the Member States’ police authorities and other law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy.
Europol’s mission shall be to support and strengthen action by the Member States’ police authorities and other law enforcement services and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating serious crime affecting two or more Member States, terrorism and forms of crime which affect a common interest covered by a Union policy.
European laws shall determine Europol’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks .
European laws shall determine Europol’s structure, operation, field of action and tasks .