natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to support these efforts, the European Council calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of aligning interventions under the PEACE II programme and the International Fund for Ireland with those of the other programmes under the Structural Funds that come to an end in 2006, including the implications in financial terms.”
In order to support these efforts, the European Council calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of aligning interventions under the PEACE II programme and the International Fund for Ireland with those of the other programmes under the Structural Funds that come to an end in 2006, including the implications in financial terms.”
It is clear therefore that considerable political good will exists for the extension of this Programme both at Commission level and at the level of the Heads of State and Government.
It is clear therefore that considerable political good will exists for the extension of this Programme both at Commission level and at the level of the Heads of State and Government.
It is perhaps only to be regretted that given this was already evident at the June European Council, it has taken the Commission until mid-October in order to produce a proposal for a Council Regulation.
It is perhaps only to be regretted that given this was already evident at the June European Council, it has taken the Commission until mid-October in order to produce a proposal for a Council Regulation.
The consequent obligation on Parliament to condense all its normal procedures must therefore be seen as unfortunate.
The consequent obligation on Parliament to condense all its normal procedures must therefore be seen as unfortunate.
Finally, given the degree of support for the extension of PEACE, it is incumbent upon the Budgetary Authority - Parliament and the Council - to approve the necessary modifications to the 2000-2006 Financial Perspective, or to take whatever other measures might be necessary, in order to ensure that adequate financial provisions are put in place for the continuation of the programme.
Finally, given the degree of support for the extension of PEACE, it is incumbent upon the Budgetary Authority - Parliament and the Council - to approve the necessary modifications to the 2000-2006 Financial Perspective, or to take whatever other measures might be necessary, in order to ensure that adequate financial provisions are put in place for the continuation of the programme.
In a climate where there still exists, understandably, distrust and indeed fear in many quarters, the on-going peace process requires subtle and delicate handling.
In a climate where there still exists, understandably, distrust and indeed fear in many quarters, the on-going peace process requires subtle and delicate handling.
Political messages and symbolism are all important.
Political messages and symbolism are all important.
In this the EU can now act positively to demonstrate its solidarity, while at the same time contributing in a concrete manner to the creation of a better society in a region of Europe that has already suffered too much.
In this the EU can now act positively to demonstrate its solidarity, while at the same time contributing in a concrete manner to the creation of a better society in a region of Europe that has already suffered too much.
Parliament should therefore provides its assent so that this extension may come into force on 1 January 2005.
Parliament should therefore provides its assent so that this extension may come into force on 1 January 2005.
ATTĪSTĪBAS KOMITEJAS ATZINUMS
OPINION OF COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS
Par Komisijas priekšlikumu Padomes regulai, ar kuru groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 1260/1999, ar ko paredz vispārīgus noteikumus par struktūrfondiem, attiecībā uz programmas PEACE ilguma pagarināšanu un jaunu saistību apropriāciju piešķiršanu ( KOM(2004)0631 – 16064/2004 — C6-0252/2004 — 2004/0224(AVC) )
Subject: Commission proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds concerning the extension of the duration of the PEACE programme and the granting of new commitment appropriations ( COM(2004)0631 –16064/2004 - C6-0252/2004 - 2004/0224(AVC) )
OV vēl nav publicēts. .
Not yet published in OJ.
Komiteja minēto Komisijas priekšlikumu izskatīja 2004. gada 15. novembra sanāksmē.
The Committee considered the above Commission proposal at its meeting of 15 November 2004.
Šajā sanāksmē Budžeta komiteja vienbalsīgi, vienam deputātam atturoties
At this occasion, the Committee on Budgets decided unanimously with 1 abstention
Balsojumā piedalījās: Janusz Lewandowski (priekšsēdētājs), Jan Mulder (priekšsēdētāja vietnieks), Reimer Böge (priekšsēdētāja vietnieks), Gérard Deprez (atzinuma sagatavotājs), Laima Liucija Andrikien ė, Paulo Casaca , Brigitte Douay , Den Dover , Salvador Garriga Polledo , Neena Gill , Dariusz Maciej Grabowski , Louis Grech , Catherine Guy-Quint , Anne Elisabet Jensen , Wiesław Stefan Kuc , Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk , Alain Lamassoure , Albert Jan Maat , Vladimír Maňka , Hans-Peter Martin , Jean-Claude Martinez , Mario Mauro, Gérard Onesta , Wojciech Roszkowski , Paul Rübig , Antonis Samaras , Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski , Liszl ó Surjįn , Helga Trüpel , Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski , Marilisa Xenogiannakopoulou un Tomį Zatloukal . , nolēma pieņemt šādu grozījumu:
The following were present for the vote: Janusz Lewandowski (chairman), Jan Mulder (vice-chairman), Reimer Böge (vice-chairman), Gérard Deprez (draftsman), Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Paulo Casaca, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Neena Gill, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Louis Grech, Catherine Guy-Quint, Anne Elisabet Jensen, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk, Alain Lamassoure, Albert Jan Maat, Vladimír Maňka, Hans-Peter Martin, Jean-Claude Martinez, Mario Mauro, Gérard Onesta, Wojciech Roszkowski, Paul Rübig, Antonis Samaras, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Marilisa Xenogiannakopoulou and Tomáš Zatloukal. , to adopt the following amendment:
“uzskata, ka Komisijas priekšlikumam ir jāpievieno finanšu pārskats un ka šādam pārskatam jāsaskan ar finanšu plāna otrās izdevumu kategorijas maksimālo robežu tikai tad, ja starp Eiropas Parlamentu un Padomi ir panākta vienošanās par to, ka tiek palielināta šīs kategorijas atbilstīgās apakškategorijas maksimālā robeža.”
"Considers that a financial statement should be attached to the Commission proposal, and that such a statement shall only be compatible with the ceiling of Heading 2 of the financial perspective, provided that an agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the increase of the corresponding sub-ceiling within the heading is reached."
Budžeta komiteja aicina atbildīgo Reģionālās attīstības komiteju iekļaut minēto grozījumu tās ziņojumā.
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the above amendment in its report.
(personiskais paraksts) J anusz Lewandowski
(sgd) Janusz Lewandowski
Priekšlikums Padomes regulai, ar kuru groza Regulu (EK) Nr. 1260/1999, ar ko paredz vispārīgus noteikumus par struktūrfondiem, attiecībā uz programmas PEACE ilguma pagarināšanu un jaunu saistību apropriāciju piešķiršanu.
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds concerning the extension of the duration of the PEACE programme and the granting of new commitment apppropriations
EK Līguma 161. pants
Article 161, EC
75. panta 1. punkts
Rule 75(1)
par Padomes kopējo nostāju Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes lēmuma pieņemšanai daudzgadējas Kopienas programmas ieviešanā, lai padarītu digitālo saturu Eiropā pieejamāku, lietojamāku un izmantojamāku
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable
– ņemot vērā Padomes kopējo nostāju (10458/4/2004 – C6-0140/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (10458/4/2004 – C6‑0140/2004 ),
22.4.2004. pieņemtie teksti, P5_TA(2004)0364 . attiecībā uz Komisijas priekšlikumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei ( KOM(2004)0096 )
Texts Adopted, 22.4.2004, P5_TA(2004)0364 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0096 )
– ņemot vērā grozīto Komisijas priekšlikumu ( KOM(2004)0367 )
– having regard to the Commission's amended proposal ( COM(2004)0367 )
– ņemot vērā Rūpniecības, pētniecības un enerģētikas komitejas ieteikumu otrajam lasījumam ( A6‑0002/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0002/2005 ),
Saskaņā ar lēmumu, Kopienas pasākumu ieviešanas finansiālais ietvars laikā no 2005. gada 1. janvāra līdz 2008. gada 31. decembrim, tiek noteikts 135 miljoni EUR , no kuriem 55,6 miljoni EUR ir paredzēti laika periodam līdz 2006. gada 31. decembrim.
The financial framework for the implementation of the Community actions under this Decision for the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008 is hereby set at EUR 135 million , of which EUR 55,6 million is for the period until 31 December 2006.
Saskaņā ar lēmumu, Kopienas pasākumu ieviešanas finansiālais ietvars laikā no 2005. gada 1. janvāra līdz 2008. gada 31. decembrim, tiek noteikts 149 miljoni EUR , no kuriem 55,6 miljoni EUR ir paredzēti laika periodam līdz 2006. gada 31. decembrim.
The financial framework for the implementation of the Community actions under this Decision for the period from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008 is hereby set at EUR 149 million , of which EUR 55,6 million is for the period until 31 December 2006.
The amount agreed within the Council in its common position implies too great a reduction with respect to the Commission initial proposal (163 million €) and does not provide the Programme with appropriated funding.
The amount agreed within the Council in its common position implies too great a reduction with respect to the Commission initial proposal (163 million €) and does not provide the Programme with appropriated funding.
In order to find a compromise with the Council the Parliament can accept a minor reduction.
In order to find a compromise with the Council the Parliament can accept a minor reduction.
Padomes kopējā nostāja Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes lēmuma pieņemšanai daudzgadējas Kopienas programmas ieviešanā, lai padarītu digitālo saturu Eiropā pieejamāku, lietojamāku un izmantojamāku
Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a multiannual Community programme to make digital content in Europe more accessible, usable and exploitable
Jurdiskais pamats
Legal basis
EK līguma 251. panta 2. punkts
Article 251(2) EC
1. lasījuma datums EP – P[5]
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P[5]
Aizstātais referents
Previous rapporteur(s)
– ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei ( KOM(2004)0162 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0162 )
– ņemot vērā EK līguma 251. panta 2. punktu un 95. pantu, atbilstīgi kuram Komisija iesniedza priekšlikumu Parlamentam ( C5–0126/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0126/2004 ),
– ņemot vērā Vides, sabiedrības veselības un pārtikas nekaitīguma komitejas ziņojumu ( A6-0004/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0004/2005 ),
2. aicina Komisiju, ja tā vēlas priekšlikumu būtiski grozīt vai aizstāt ar citu redakciju, nodot šo jautājumu Parlamentam atkārtoti;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
3.a) otrreizēja izmantojamība, pārstrādājamība un reģenerējamība ir svarīgi ES vides politikas mērķi, visas iesaistītās puses atzinīgi vērtē Direktīvas 2000/53/EK un šīs direktīvas ieguldījumu;
(3a) Re-usability, recyclability and recoverability are important EU environment policy objectives, and consequently the contributions of Directive 2000/53/EC and this Directive are welcomed by all concerned.
5) “references transportlīdzeklis” ir transportlīdzekļa tipa tā versija, kuru apstiprinātājiestāde ir atzinusi par visproblemātiskāko attiecībā uz otrreizēju izmantojamību, pārstrādājamību, reģenerējamību;
(5) ‘reference vehicle’ means the version within a type of vehicle, which is identified by the approval authority as being the most problematic in terms of re-usability, recyclability and recoverability;
Apstiprinātājiestāde, vienojoties ar ražotāju, izvēlas šos transportlīdzekļus no dažādām tipa versijām..
These vehicles shall be chosen by the approval authority from amongst the different versions within a type in agreement with the manufacturer.
Ņem vērā šādus kritērijus:
The following criteria shall be taken into account:
virsbūves veidu,
the type of bodywork;
pieejamos pielāgošanas līmeņus,
the available trim levels;
pieejamās papildu iekārtas, kuras var ierīkot, ražotājam par to uzņemoties atbildību;
the available optional equipment which can be fitted under the manufacturer’s responsibility;
Apstiprinātājiestāde pārbauda, vai no polimēriem vai elastomēriem izgatavotās detaļas, kas ir iekļautas šīs direktīvas I pielikuma 2. punktā minētajā demontāžas sarakstā, ir marķētas saskaņā ar Komisijas 2003. gada 27. februāra Lēmumu 2003/138/EK , ar ko nosaka transportlīdzekļu detaļu un materiālu kodēšanas standartus, ievērojot Direktīvu 2000/53/EK.
The approval authority shall check that the component parts made of polymers or elastomers included in the dismantling list referred to in Annex I paragraph 2 to this Directive are marked in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/138/EC of 27 February 2003 establishing component and material coding standards for vehicles pursuant to Directive 2000/53/EC.
Apstiprinātājiestāde pārbauda, vai ražotājs ir veicis vajadzīgos pasākumus, lai nodrošinātu, ka no polimēriem vai elastomēriem izgatavotās detaļas, kas ir iekļautas šīs direktīvas I pielikuma 2. punktā minētajā demontāžas sarakstā, ir marķētas saskaņā ar Komisijas 2003. gada 27. februāra Lēmumu 2003/138/EK 1 , ar ko nosaka transportlīdzekļu detaļu un materiālu kodēšanas standartus, ievērojot Direktīvu 2000/53/EK.
The approval authority shall check whether the manufacturer has taken the requisite steps to ensure that the component parts made of polymers or elastomers included in the dismantling list referred to in Annex I paragraph 2 to this Directive are marked in accordance with Commission Decision 2003/138/EC of 27 February 2003 establishing component and material coding standards for vehicles pursuant to Directive 2000/53/EC.
Dalībvalstis saskaņā ar šīs direktīvas IV pielikuma 2. punktu ieceļ kompetentu iestādi , kas veic sākotnējo novērtējumu un izdod atbilstības sertifikātu.
Member States shall appoint a competent authority, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Annex IV to this Directive, to carry out the preliminary assessment and to issue the certificate of compliance.
Dalībvalstis saskaņā ar šīs direktīvas IV pielikuma 2. punktu ieceļ kompetentu iestādi , kas veic sākotnējo novērtējumu un izdod atbilstības sertifikātu; ir jāieceļ šāda veida iestādes, kas jau pastāv;
Member States shall appoint a competent authority, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Annex IV to this Directive, to carry out the preliminary assessment and issue the certificate of compliance ; already existing authorities of this kind should be appointed .
Atkarībā no transportlīdzekļa tipa izvēlas vienu references transportlīdzekli:
With respect to a vehicle type, one reference vehicle shall be selected within:
Ja apstiprinātājiestādei un ražotajam kopējiem spēkiem neizdodas noteikt, kura transportlīdzekļa tipa versija ir visproblemātiskākā attiecībā uz otrreizēju izmantojamību, pārstrādājamību, reģenerējamību, atkarībā no transportlīdzekļa tipa izvēlas vienu references transportlīdzekli:
Should the approval authority and the manufacturer fail jointly to identify the most problematic version of a type of vehicle in terms of re-usability, recyclability and recoverability, with respect to a vehicle type, one reference vehicle shall be selected within:
Priekšlikums Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes direktīvai par mehānisko transportlīdzekļu tipa apstiprinājumu attiecībā uz to otrreizēju izmantošanu, pārstrādāšanu un utilizāciju, un ar ko groza Padomes Direktīvu 70/156/EEK
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to their re-usability, recyclability and recoverability and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC
ES Līguma 251. panta 2. punkts un 95. pants
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
ENVI 29.03.2004
ENVI 29.3.2004
TRAN 29.03.2004
TRAN 29.3.2004
TRAN 28.07.2004
TRAN 28.7.2004
Holger Krahmer 01.09.2004
Holger Krahmer 1.9.2004
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs , Liam Aylward, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Norbert Glante, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Liam Aylward, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Norbert Glante, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
PE 347.301v03-00
PE 347.301v02-00
– ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei ( KOM(2004)0320 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 0320)
– ņemot vērā EK Līguma 251. panta 2. punktu un 95. pantu, saskaņā ar kuriem Komisija tam iesniedz priekšlikumu ( C6‑0030/2004 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0030/2004 ),
– ņemot vērā Vides, sabiedrības veselības un pārtikas nekaitīguma komitejas ziņojumu (A6‑0000/2005),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0005/2005 ),
Komisijas priekšlikums
Text proposed by the Commission
Nedrīkst laist apgrozībā vai izmantot kā vielu vai sastāvdaļu preparātu pagatavošanai komponentu koncentrācijā, kas sasniedz vai pārsniedz 0,1 % masas jebkādos pielietojumos, izņemot starpproduktus.”
Toluene is used as a raw material in the production of benzene and a host of other chemicals (e.g. benzoic acid, nitrotoluenes, tolyl diisocyanates, as well as dyes, pharmaceuticals, food additives, plastics, etc.).
Priekšlikums Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes direktīvai par toluola un trihlorbenzola tirdzniecības un lietošanas ierobežojumiem (Direktīvas Nr. 76/769/EEK divdesmit astotais grozījums)
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of toluene and trichlorobenzene (twenty-eighth amendment of Council Directive 76/769/EEC)
EK Līguma 251. panta 2. punkts un 95. pants
Articles 251(2) and 95 EC
Apspriešanas datums EP
Date submitted to Parliament
par priekšlikumu Padomes lēmumam par papildu protokola noslēgšanu asociācijas nolīgumam starp Eiropas Kopienu un tās dalībvalstīm, no vienas puses, un Čīles Republiku, no otras puses, ņemot vērā Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas, Slovākijas Republikas un Ungārijas Republikas pievienošanos Eiropas Savienībai.
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
– ņemot vērā Padomes lēmuma priekšlikumu (KOM(2004) 0566)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0566 )
“Oficiālajā Vēstnesī” vēl nav publicēts. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– ņemot vērā piekrišanas pieprasījumu, ko Padome iesniedza saskaņā ar EK līguma 300. panta 3. punkta otro apakšpunktu, kā arī 310. pantu un 300. panta 2. punkta pirmo apakšpunktu ( C6-0022/2004 );
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Articles 310 and 300(2), first subparagraph ( C6‑0022/2005 ),
– ņemot vērā Reglamenta 75., 83. panta 7. punktu un 43. panta 1. punktu,
– having regard to Rules 75, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ņemot vērā Starptautiskās tirdzniecības komitejas ieteikumu ( A6‑0007/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0007/2005 ),
Priekšlikums Padomes lēmumam par papildu protokola noslēgšanu asociācijas nolīgumam starp Eiropas Kopienu un tās dalībvalstīm, no vienas puses, un Čīles Republiku, no otras puses, ņemot vērā Čehijas Republikas, Igaunijas Republikas, Kipras Republikas, Latvijas Republikas, Lietuvas Republikas, Maltas Republikas, Polijas Republikas, Slovēnijas Republikas, Slovākijas Republikas un Ungārijas Republikas pievienošanos Eiropas Savienībai.
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Chile, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic to the European Union
EK līguma 300. panta 3. punkta otrais apakšpunkts
Article 300(3), second subparagraph, EC Treaty
83. panta 7. punkts, 75. panta 1. punkts un 43. pants
Rules 83(7), 75(1) and 43
INTA 11.01.2005
INTA 11.1.2005
Enrique Barón Crespo 14.09.2004
Enrique Barón Crespo 14.9.2004
43. panta 1. punkts 14.09.2004.
Rule 43(1) 14.9.2004
par Eiropas Vides un veselības rīcības plānu 2004.–2010.gadam
on the European Environment & Health Action Plan 2004-2010
PE 349.889v01-00
PE 349.889v02-00
EIROPAS PARLAMENTA REZOLŪCIJAS PRIEKŠLIKUMS.....................................................3
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...................................................3
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT...................................................................................................10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT...................................................................................................10
– ņemot vērā 2004. gada 31. marta rezolūciju par Eiropas stratēģiju vides un veselības jomā
– having regard to its resolution of 31 March 2004 on a European Environment and Health Strategy
Pieņemtais teksts , P5_TA(2004)0246 . ,
Text adopted, P5_TA(2004)0246 . ,