natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dalībvalstis nodrošina, lai izmeklēšana vai kriminālvajāšana par šajā pamatlēmumā minētajiem likumpārkāpumiem tiktu veikta visefektīvākajā veidā, pilnībā ievērojot cilvēktiesības, un nebūtu atkarīga no noziegumā cietušās personas paziņojuma vai apsūdzības, vismaz tad, ja tas notiek dalībvalsts teritorijā.
Member States shall ensure that investigations into, or prosecution of, offences covered by this Framework Decision are conducted in the most efficient way with full respect for human rights and not dependent on a report or accusation made by a person subjected to the offence, at least if the acts were committed in the territory of the Member State.
Papildus pasākumiem, kas paredzēti Padomes 2001. gada 15. marta Pamatlēmumā 2001/220/JAI par cietušo statusu kriminālprocesos, katra dalībvalsts veic, ja tas nepieciešams, visus iespējamos pasākumus, lai garantētu adekvātu palīdzību cietušo ģimenēm kriminālprocesa pamatos.
In addition to the measures laid down in Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings, each Member State shall, if necessary, take all measures possible to ensure appropriate assistance for victims’ families.
Papildus pasākumiem, kas paredzēti Padomes 2001. gada 15. marta Pamatlēmumā 2001/220/JAI par cietušo statusu kriminālprocesos, katra dalībvalsts veic, ja tas nepieciešams, visus iespējamos pasākumus, lai garantētu adekvātu aizsardzību un palīdzību cietušajiem un viņu ģimenēm kriminālprocesa pamatos.
In addition to the measures laid down in Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA of 15 March 2001 on the standing of victims in criminal proceedings, each Member State shall, if necessary, take all measures possible to ensure appropriate protection and assistance for victims and their families.
Smago un organizēto noziegumu vienība un Līdzekļu atgūšanas vienība
Serious and Organised Crime Unit and Asset Recovery Unit
Katrā dalībvalstī jānodibina Smago un organizēto noziegumu vienība un Līdzekļu atgūšanas vienība, lai nodrošinātu koordināciju valsts līmenī un šīs vienības darbotos kā vienotie kontaktpunkti .
Each Member State shall establish a Serious and Organised Crime Unit and an Asset Recovery Unit, to ensure coordination at national level and to act as a single contact point.
Liecinieku un policijas informatoru aizsardzība
Protection of witnesses and police informants
Katra dalībvalsts veic visus vajadzīgos pasākumus, lai tos, kuri sniedz noderīgu informāciju noziedzīgu organizētu grupu izdarītu noziegumu novēršanā, atklāšanā un / vai sodīšanā, neatkarīgi no tā, vai viņi ir liecinieki vai pastrādājuši kādu no 4. pantā minētajiem noziegumiem, vai viņu radiniekus pienācīgi aizsargātu no atriebības, draudiem un tiešas iebaidīšanas.
Each Member State shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that persons who supply information useful for the prevention, uncovering and/or punishment of crimes committed by criminal organisations, whether they are witnesses or perpetrators of crimes that fall within the scope of Article 4, are adequately protected against the risks of retaliation, threats or direct intimidation targeting themselves or their relatives.
Starptautiskā sadarbība
International cooperation
Dalībvalstis veic nepieciešamos pasākumus, lai nodrošinātu starptautisko sadarbību, cita starpā veidojot kopīgas izmeklēšanas grupas.
The Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure international cooperation, inter alia by forming joint investigation teams.
Sākot ar 2006. gadu, d alībvalstis vāc statistiku par 2. punktā minētajiem noziegumiem un nosūta to Komisijai, kura apkopo vienotu un salīdzināmu statistiku.
Member States shall collect statistics on the offences referred to in Article 2 and shall forward those statistics to the Commission, which shall draw up harmonised and comparable statistics as from 2006.
Dalībvalstis, vēlākais līdz (… datums) iesniedz Padomes un Komisijas ģenerālsekretariātam dokumentus par šā pamatlēmuma noteikumu ieviešanu nacionālajā likumdošanā.
The Member States shall transmit to the General Secretariat of the Council and to the Commission, by [ ... ] at the latest, the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them by this Framework Decision.
Pamatojoties uz Komisijas iesniegto rakstisko ziņojumu šajā sakarā, Padome pārbauda, vēlākais (… datums), vai dalībvalstis ir veikušas visus vajadzīgos pasākumus, lai izpildītu šo pamatlēmumu.
The Council, acting on the basis of a report established on the basis of this information and a written report transmitted by the Commission, shall, by [ ... ] at the latest, assess the extent to which Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Framework Decision.
Pamatojoties uz Komisijas iesniegto rakstisko ziņojumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei šajā sakarā, Eiropas Parlaments un Padome pārbauda, vēlākais (… datums), vai dalībvalstis ir veikušas visus vajadzīgos pasākumus, lai izpildītu šo pamatlēmumu
The European Parliament and the Council, acting on the basis of a report established on the basis of this information and a written report transmitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council , shall, by [ ... ] at the latest, assess the extent to which Member States have taken the necessary measures to comply with this Framework Decision.
ATZINUMS Sniegusi Ārlietu komiteja
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs
Ārlietu komiteja aicina par jautājumu atbildīgo Pilsoņu brīvību, tieslietu un iekšlietu komiteju savā ziņojumā iekļaut šādus grozījumus:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Eiropas Savienība ievēro principus, kas atzīti Līguma par Eiropas Savienību 6. panta 2. punktā un atspoguļoti Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību hartā, īpaši tās VI nodaļā .
The Union observes the principles recognised by Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and reflected in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Chapter VI thereof.
Katra dalībvalsts veic visus nepieciešamos pasākumus saskaņā ar savām juridiskajām tradīcijām un pieejamiem līdzekļiem, lai uzlabotu noziedzības profilaksi.
Each Member State shall take all necessary measures, in accordance with its own legal traditions and available means, to improve the prevention of crime.
Šajā sakarā ļoti ieteicami šādi pasākumi:
In this connection, the following measures are highly recommended:
- palielināt sabiedrības informētību par noziedzības izpausmju apjomu un veidu visā Eiropā un draudiem, ko tā rada personu integritātei un labklājībai dalībvalstīs,
- increasing public awareness of the extent and nature of criminal activities across Europe and the threats which they pose to the integrity of individuals and the welfare of the Member States;
- sekmēt labākas prakses apmaiņu dalībvalstīs.
- promoting the exchange of best practices among Member States.
Kopienai jāsniedz finansiālā palīdzība, lai atbalstītu sabiedrības informētības kampaņu.
The Community should provide financial assistance to support the information and awareness-raising campaign.
Dalībvalstis nodrošina Eiropola kā noziedzības izlūkdatu iestādes lomas nostiprināšanu, lai tas varētu veikt savu pamatuzdevumu, sniedzot dalībvalstīm informāciju un izlūkdatus, kas ļautu sasniegt vislabākos rezultātus organizētās noziedzības novēršanā un apkarošanā .
Member States shall ensure that Europol’s role as an organ for criminal intelligence is strengthened in order to fulfil its task of providing Member States with information and intelligence leading to most effective results in preventing and combating organised crime.
2. panta 1.a punkts (jauns)
Article 2 , paragraph 1 a (new)
Šis pamatlēmums neietekmē pienākumu respektēt pamattiesības un juridiskos principus, kas noteikti Eiropas Savienības Līguma 6. pantā.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of altering the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union.
2. panta b) punkts
Article 2, point (b)
b) ikvienas personas rīcība, kura tīši un apzinoties gan savas kriminālās rīcības mērķi, gan organizācijas nolūkus izdarīt minētos noziegumus, aktīvi piedalās organizācijas kriminālajās darbībās, ieskaitot informācijas vai materiālas palīdzības sniegšanu, musināšanu veikt noziedzīgas darbības, iesaista organizācijā jaunus dalībniekus, jebkādā veidā finansē organizācijas darbību, apzinoties, ka šī līdzdalība veicinās šīs organizācijas kriminālo darbību īstenošanu.
(b) conduct by any person who, with intent and with knowledge of either the aim and general activity of the organisation or its intention to commit the offences in question, actively takes part in the organisation’s criminal activities, including the provision of information or material means, incitement to commit criminal activities, the recruitment of new members and all forms of financing of its activities, knowing that such participation will contribute to the achievement of the organisation’s criminal activities.
8. panta 2. punkts
Article 8 , paragraph 2
Priekšlikums Padomes Pamatlēmumam par cīņu pret organizēto noziedzību
Proposal for a Council Framework decision on the fight against organised crime
Komiteja, kurai lūgts sniegt atzinumu Datums, kad paziņoja plenārsēdē
Opinion by Date announced in plenary
Ciešāka sadarbība – datums, kad paziņoja plenārsēdē
Enhanced cooperation – date announced in plenary
Par atzinumu atbildīgā referente: Iecelšanas datums
Draftswoman Date appointed
Aizstājējs(-i), kas bija klāt galīgajā balsojumā
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
Piezīmes (pieejamas tikai vienā valodā)
Comments (data available in one language only)
ATZINUMS Sniegusi JURIDISKĀ komiteja
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs
par priekšlikumu Padomes Pamatlēmumam par cīņu pret organizēto noziedzību
on the proposal for a Council framework decision on the fight against organised crime
International organised crime represents a true scourge in the European Union.
International organised crime represents a true scourge in the European Union.
In addition to the enormous profits derived from individual crimes committed (trafficking in drugs, weapons, human beings, etc.), criminal organisations operating in the Union’s territory distort not only the free market and healthy competition, but also the very rules of civil co-existence.
In addition to the enormous profits derived from individual crimes committed (trafficking in drugs, weapons, human beings, etc.), criminal organisations operating in the Union’s territory distort not only the free market and healthy competition, but also the very rules of civil co-existence.
In those areas where they are most firmly established, such organisations systematically invest and recycle huge amounts of capital in apparently legal economic activities, to the point where they influence the development of entire regions.
In those areas where they are most firmly established, such organisations systematically invest and recycle huge amounts of capital in apparently legal economic activities, to the point where they influence the development of entire regions.
Criminal organisations employ their capital or manpower in a wide variety of activities, from high finance to service companies, from waste disposal to building, and wherever there is any opportunity of acquiring substantial public funds.
Criminal organisations employ their capital or manpower in a wide variety of activities, from high finance to service companies, from waste disposal to building, and wherever there is any opportunity of acquiring substantial public funds.
As a result of violence, corruption and extortion directed against legitimate business, the heavy costs of these illegal activities are borne by citizens whose quality of life is affected.
As a result of violence, corruption and extortion directed against legitimate business, the heavy costs of these illegal activities are borne by citizens whose quality of life is affected.
The Commission has rightly chosen the framework decision as an instrument for requiring the 25 Member States to approximate their criminal law provisions on the fight against organised crime, since at present the Member States’ legal systems tackle this serious phenomenon in very different ways, and in some cases with dangerous loopholes.
The Commission has rightly chosen the framework decision as an instrument for requiring the 25 Member States to approximate their criminal law provisions on the fight against organised crime, since at present the Member States’ legal systems tackle this serious phenomenon in very different ways, and in some cases with dangerous loopholes.
The present proposal for a framework decision has therefore been confined to 11 articles designed to regulate basic concepts vital for combating organised crime, setting out common minimum standards to be incorporated into the respective national criminal laws of the Member States so as to provide for:
The present proposal for a framework decision has therefore been confined to 11 articles designed to regulate basic concepts vital for combating organised crime, setting out common minimum standards to be incorporated into the respective national criminal laws of the Member States so as to provide for:
(1) a common definition of organised crime, together with specific cases of related offences;
(1) a common definition of organised crime, together with specific cases of related offences;
(2) minimum penalties for natural and legal persons guilty of such offences;
(2) minimum penalties for natural and legal persons guilty of such offences;
(3) special rules for those who cooperate with the judicial process;
(3) special rules for those who cooperate with the judicial process;
(4) minimum procedural rules for defining jurisdiction and coordinating criminal measures among Member States.
(4) minimum procedural rules for defining jurisdiction and coordinating criminal measures among Member States.
Your draftsman believes that it is vital to legislate as simply and clearly as possible, thereby keeping to a minimum any possible interpretation difficulties or delays in transposition.
Your draftsman believes that it is vital to legislate as simply and clearly as possible, thereby keeping to a minimum any possible interpretation difficulties or delays in transposition.
It is worth bearing in mind that these rules must be converted into specific instruments for justice operators and police forces, who require simple and effective methods in order to pursue their investigations and inquiries successfully.
It is worth bearing in mind that these rules must be converted into specific instruments for justice operators and police forces, who require simple and effective methods in order to pursue their investigations and inquiries successfully.
In particular, taking a cue from existing legislation in Member States which, for historical and social reasons, were the first to tackle these problems in depth, your draftsman is proposing a number of amendments designed simply to make the text easier to use and apply in practice.
In particular, taking a cue from existing legislation in Member States which, for historical and social reasons, were the first to tackle these problems in depth, your draftsman is proposing a number of amendments designed simply to make the text easier to use and apply in practice.
With regard to the definition of a criminal organisation, it is proposed to delete the requirement for the association to be established over a period of time , since this is not essential and above all would entail an excessive burden of proof that would hamper the carrying out of investigations.
With regard to the definition of a criminal organisation, it is proposed to delete the requirement for the association to be established over a period of time , since this is not essential and above all would entail an excessive burden of proof that would hamper the carrying out of investigations.
With the same end in view, it was also thought useful to include as one of the defining features of a criminal organisation its hierarchical structure , rather than the expression used by the Commission, a developed structure , which is a debatable concept, difficult to define.
With the same end in view, it was also thought useful to include as one of the defining features of a criminal organisation its hierarchical structure , rather than the expression used by the Commission, a developed structure , which is a debatable concept, difficult to define.
With regard to other aspects, it was decided to include significant additions to the text in order to overcome a number of serious shortcomings.
With regard to other aspects, it was decided to include significant additions to the text in order to overcome a number of serious shortcomings.
For example, in Article 3 it was decided to include, above and beyond custodial sentences, penalties such as the seizure of assets and measures such as a temporary or permanent disqualification from pursuing an activity for persons belonging to a criminal organisation.
For example, in Article 3 it was decided to include, above and beyond custodial sentences, penalties such as the seizure of assets and measures such as a temporary or permanent disqualification from pursuing an activity for persons belonging to a criminal organisation.
Lastly, in the interests of better and more effective coordination of penal measures between Member States, it is proposed that a specific provision be added to Article 7 to settle disputes over jurisdiction between the authorities of various Member States, by introducing a rule whereby, when criminal proceedings have been initiated by more than one Member State on the basis of the same facts, they should continue in the Member States where proceedings were first opened.
Lastly, in the interests of better and more effective coordination of penal measures between Member States, it is proposed that a specific provision be added to Article 7 to settle disputes over jurisdiction between the authorities of various Member States, by introducing a rule whereby, when criminal proceedings have been initiated by more than one Member State on the basis of the same facts, they should continue in the Member States where proceedings were first opened.
These specific suggestions are therefore designed to ensure that, after countless official declarations on the matter, steps can finally be taken in the 25 Member States, to achieve the necessary harmony between national criminal laws, without which this dangerous scourge afflicting our society can never be effectively eliminated.
These specific suggestions are therefore designed to ensure that, after countless official declarations on the matter, steps can finally be taken in the 25 Member States, to achieve the necessary harmony between national criminal laws, without which this dangerous scourge afflicting our society can never be effectively eliminated.
1. panta 1. daļa
Article 1, first paragraph
Saskaņā ar šo pamatlēmumu ar “kriminālu organizāciju” saprot strukturētu apvienību, kurā ir vairāk par divām personām, kas izveidota noteiktā laikā un koncentrēti darbojas, izdarot likumpārkāpumus, kas sodāmi ar brīvības atņemšanu vai ar aizturēšanas lēmumu, kas atbilst brīvības atņemšanai līdz četriem gadiem, vai bargāku sodu, ja pārkāpumi satur nepārprotamu vēlmi tieši vai netieši iegūt finansiālu vai cita veida materiālu labumu.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association , established over a period of time, of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
Saskaņā ar šo pamatlēmumu ar “kriminālu organizāciju” saprot strukturētu apvienību, kurā ir vairāk par divām personām, kura koncentrēti darbojas, izdarot likumpārkāpumus, kas sodāmi ar brīvības atņemšanu vai ar aizturēšanas lēmumu, kas atbilst brīvības atņemšanai līdz četriem gadiem, vai bargāku sodu, ja pārkāpumi satur nepārprotamu vēlmi tieši vai netieši iegūt finansiālu vai cita veida materiālu labumu.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
1. panta 2. daļa
Article 1, second paragraph
3. panta 2.a punkts (jauns)
Article 3, paragraph 2a (new)
Katra dalībvalsts veic vajadzīgos pasākumus, lai papildus šī panta iepriekšējos punktos minētajiem sodiem, personām, kas sauktas pie atbildības par noziegumiem saskaņā ar 2. pantu, piemērotu arī šādus soda mērus:
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, in addition to the penalties laid down in the previous paragraphs of this article, persons held liable for offences pursuant to Article 2 may also be subject to penalties such as:
a) tās mantas konfiskāciju, kura izmantota vai paredzēta izmantošanai nozieguma izdarīšanā, un tās mantas konfiskāciju, kura veido atlīdzību par šādu noziegumu vai ieņēmumus vai peļņu no tā, vai arī veido tā priekšmetu;
(a) the seizure of articles which were used or intended to be used to commit the offence and articles which are the reward, proceeds or profit thereof or which constitute the object thereof;
b) aizliegumu uz laiku vai vispār veikt profesionālo darbību vai uzņēmējdarbību;
(b) temporary or permanent disqualification from pursuing a professional or business activity;
c) atcelšanu no politiska vai valsts amata un aizliegumu pretendēt uz šādu amatu.
(c) disqualification from and ineligibility for political and public offices.
In many cases, in addition to custodial sentences, penalties relating to assets or involving disqualification may be effective.
In many cases, in addition to custodial sentences, penalties relating to assets or involving disqualification may be effective.
4. panta b) apakšpunkta, sākuma frāze
Article 4, letter (b), opening phrase
b) sniedz administratīvajām vai juridiskajām iestādēm informāciju, ko tās nevar iegūt citādā veidā, tādējādi palīdzot:
(b) provides the administrative or judicial authorities with information which they would not otherwise have been able to obtain, helping them to :
b) Sniedz administratīvajām vai juridiskajām iestādēm savlaicīgu un pilnīgu informāciju, kas palīdz:
(b) provides the administrative or judicial authorities with timely and exhaustive information useful to :
If information concerning an offence is to be genuinely useful to the investigating authorities, it must be timely and as complete as possible; it is also necessary to remove the need to prove in some way that it would be impossible for the authorities to obtain the same information by other means, something which seems illogical and difficult to demonstrate.
If information concerning an offence is to be genuinely useful to the investigating authorities, it must be timely and as complete as possible; it is also necessary to remove the need to prove in some way that it would be impossible for the authorities to obtain the same information by other means, something which seems illogical and difficult to demonstrate.
4. panta b) apakšpunkta pirmais ievilkums
Article 4, letter (b), first indent
4. panta b) apakšpunkta otrais ievilkums
Article 4, letter (b), second indent
– ļaut identificēt vai aizturēt par 1. un 2. pantā minētajiem noziegumiem atbildīgās personas;
– allow the identification or capture of those responsible for offences referred to in Articles 1 and 2 ;
4. panta b) apakšpunkta trešais ievilkums
Article 4, letter (b), third indent
– atrast pierādījumus attiecībā uz 1. un 2. pantā minētajiem noziegumiem;
– find evidence relating to the offences referred to in Articles 1 and 2 ;
4. panta b) apakšpunkta piektais ievilkums
Article 4, letter (b), fifth indent