natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
43. uzsver priekšrocības, kādas nodrošinātu konkurētspējīgāka Eiropas drošības rūpniecība, kas balstīta uz esošo aizsardzības rūpniecības un citu specializētu un ar jaunām tehnoloģijām saistītu nozaru jaudu, veicinot ekonomisko izaugsmi un vispārējo Eiropas ekonomikas konkurētspēju, kā arī uzsver to pozitīvo ietekmi uz Eiropas Savienības sabiedrību;
Stresses the benefits that a more competitive European security industry, based on the existing capacity of the defence industry and other specialised areas relating to new technology infrastructures, could provide in strengthening the economic growth and overall competitiveness of the European economy, and also stresses its positive results within society in the European Union;
on Security Research - The Next Steps
on Security Research - The Next Steps
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Underlines the public-interest nature of all aspects of security research, and accordingly calls for the programmes and projects in this field to be given sufficient stability and for the budgetary allocation to be linked to the trend in gross domestic product, so as to secure the greatest possible continuity over time and the best results;
Underlines the public-interest nature of all aspects of security research, and accordingly calls for the programmes and projects in this field to be given sufficient stability and for the budgetary allocation to be linked to the trend in gross domestic product, so as to secure the greatest possible continuity over time and the best results;
Supports the Commission’s intention (as expressed in COM(2004)0590 ) to establish a European Security Research Programme (ESRP), commencing in 2007, as an independent specific research programme, with its own set of procedures (i.e. adapted to confidentiality requirements), rules of participation, contracts and financial instruments, within the 7th Framework Programme of Community Research; nevertheless encourages the Commission to further clarify the basic objectives and concrete implementation of the programme, and to further specify the priority level of this programme in comparison with the other programmes;calls on the Commission to take into account that security research is a new research area for the programme which should be financed in addition to the planned doubling of funds under the 7th Framework Programme;
Supports the Commission’s intention (as expressed in COM(2004)0590 ) to establish a European Security Research Programme (ESRP), commencing in 2007, as an independent specific research programme, with its own set of procedures (i.e. adapted to confidentiality requirements), rules of participation, contracts and financial instruments, within the 7th Framework Programme of Community Research; nevertheless encourages the Commission to further clarify the basic objectives and concrete implementation of the programme, and to further specify the priority level of this programme in comparison with the other programmes;calls on the Commission to take into account that security research is a new research area for the programme which should be financed in addition to the planned doubling of funds under the 7th Framework Programme;
Calls for the ESRP to be allocated sufficient funding in accordance with the recommendations of the Group of Personalities (GoP) amounting to EUR 1 billion annually in addition to all current Community, national or intergovernmental funding; calls on the Commission to act in order to ensure that equal opportunity to collaborate in the European Security Research Programme will be offered to all Member States; stresses that funding of the ESRP should not lead to a reduction in funding levels in other areas of Community research which are vital for the security and safety of Europe’s citizens and the world at large;
Calls for the ESRP to be allocated sufficient funding in accordance with the recommendations of the Group of Personalities (GoP) amounting to EUR 1 billion annually in addition to all current Community, national or intergovernmental funding; calls on the Commission to act in order to ensure that equal opportunity to collaborate in the European Security Research Programme will be offered to all Member States; stresses that funding of the ESRP should not lead to a reduction in funding levels in other areas of Community research which are vital for the security and safety of Europe’s citizens and the world at large;
Advocates, parallel to technology-driven research, a focus on the development of common modelling and threat intelligence capabilities, utilising the comparative advantages enjoyed by Member States in every given instance;
Advocates, parallel to technology-driven research, a focus on the development of common modelling and threat intelligence capabilities, utilising the comparative advantages enjoyed by Member States in every given instance;
Recommends that the future ESRP include among its priorities the fight against terrorism, territorial monitoring, civil defence, control of the Union’s external frontiers, and other areas in which Community action can provide added value without entering into conflict with the competences of the Member States;
Recommends that the future ESRP include among its priorities the fight against terrorism, territorial monitoring, civil defence, control of the Union’s external frontiers, and other areas in which Community action can provide added value without entering into conflict with the competences of the Member States;
Calls on the Commission to build on the experience gained in the first call for proposals as part of the preparatory action in order to confirm the priority areas; believes greater attention should be paid to research into public acceptance of security research and to handling of classified data in order to allow more extensive exchange of such data between Member States;
Calls on the Commission to build on the experience gained in the first call for proposals as part of the preparatory action in order to confirm the priority areas; believes greater attention should be paid to research into public acceptance of security research and to handling of classified data in order to allow more extensive exchange of such data between Member States;
Calls for a ‘European Security Advisory Board’ with responsibility for defining the strategic lines of action for the ESRP , giving advice on the principles and mechanisms of implementation as well as carrying out analysis of the areas of technology in which the EU should strive to set up its own competitive capabilities without delay; requests that the advisory board could be open also to representatives of all Member States and composed of high-ranking experts from public and private clientele, industry, research institutions and other important interest groups, with smaller businesses represented as well;
Calls for a ‘European Security Advisory Board’ with responsibility for defining the strategic lines of action for the ESRP , giving advice on the principles and mechanisms of implementation as well as carrying out analysis of the areas of technology in which the EU should strive to set up its own competitive capabilities without delay; requests that the advisory board could be open also to representatives of all Member States and composed of high-ranking experts from public and private clientele, industry, research institutions and other important interest groups, with smaller businesses represented as well;
Calls on the Commission to present to the Parliament the strategic lines of action, as well as the advice received on principles and mechanisms of implementation, the specific proposals concerning participation, types of contracts and financing instruments for research activities within the ESRP, and the necessary arrangements on intellectual property and technology transfer worked out together with the Advisory Board for Security Research without delay;
Calls on the Commission to present to the Parliament the strategic lines of action, as well as the advice received on principles and mechanisms of implementation, the specific proposals concerning participation, types of contracts and financing instruments for research activities within the ESRP, and the necessary arrangements on intellectual property and technology transfer worked out together with the Advisory Board for Security Research without delay;
Calls on the Member States, in consultation with the European Parliament, to define clearly the precise tasks of the European Defence Agency (EDA) in the fields of research and technology so as to prevent a duplication of effort and optimise the contribution of dual-use research , in order to ensure an efficient and effective relationship between the ESRP and the EDA;
Calls on the Member States, in consultation with the European Parliament, to define clearly the precise tasks of the European Defence Agency (EDA) in the fields of research and technology so as to prevent a duplication of effort and optimise the contribution of dual-use research , in order to ensure an efficient and effective relationship between the ESRP and the EDA;
Calls on the Commission to build on the report ‘Research for a Secure Europe’ published by the GoP in the field of Security Research and on the final report of the Panel of Experts on Space and Security, to extend to national satellite initiatives the kind of cooperation and collaboration in security research that is necessary in order to maximise the capacity of civilian, military and dual-use systems and to meet the operational needs and requirements of the Union;
Calls on the Commission to build on the report ‘Research for a Secure Europe’ published by the GoP in the field of Security Research and on the final report of the Panel of Experts on Space and Security, to extend to national satellite initiatives the kind of cooperation and collaboration in security research that is necessary in order to maximise the capacity of civilian, military and dual-use systems and to meet the operational needs and requirements of the Union;
Reiterates its view that the measures proposed in the communication of the Commission ‘European Defence and Industrial Market Issues – Towards an EU Defence Policy’ significantly contribute to more competitiveness among firms in the security sector and support the development of a market for security products and systems, and that their unrestricted implementation can increase utility maximisation;
Reiterates its view that the measures proposed in the communication of the Commission ‘European Defence and Industrial Market Issues – Towards an EU Defence Policy’ significantly contribute to more competitiveness among firms in the security sector and support the development of a market for security products and systems, and that their unrestricted implementation can increase utility maximisation;
Invites the Commissioner responsible to report to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy before implementation of the ESRP.
Invites the Commissioner responsible to report to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy before implementation of the ESRP.
Security Research - The Next Steps
Security Research - The Next Steps
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan B?ezina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Garrelt Duin, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Garrelt Duin, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
pILSOŅU BRĪVĪBU, TIESLIETU UN IEKŠLIETU KOMITEJAS ATZINUMS
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Calls on the Commission, in view of the expected cost of the research programme (€1 billion per year), to provide for a more obvious and direct interaction between those carrying out the research and those engaged in the activities the research is devised to benefit;
Calls on the Commission, in view of the expected cost of the research programme (€1 billion per year), to provide for a more obvious and direct interaction between those carrying out the research and those engaged in the activities the research is devised to benefit;
Encourages the Council and the Commission, in cooperation with the European Parliament, before any funding for the research is allocated, to establish clearly, within and between their respective bodies, the objectives and priorities to be pursued in the area of security research and the role to be given at each stage to the Member States and the European agencies involved;
Encourages the Council and the Commission, in cooperation with the European Parliament, before any funding for the research is allocated, to establish clearly, within and between their respective bodies, the objectives and priorities to be pursued in the area of security research and the role to be given at each stage to the Member States and the European agencies involved;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to set these priorities on the basis of the operational programming framework for the implementation of the Hague programme and the fight against terrorism in the case of internal security and the European defence strategy in the case of external security;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to set these priorities on the basis of the operational programming framework for the implementation of the Hague programme and the fight against terrorism in the case of internal security and the European defence strategy in the case of external security;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the fact that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe could already have entered into force (Article IV-447 sets the date of 1 November 2006) and that responsibilities for the security of the European Union would therefore be considerably increased by the establishment of the Internal Strategy Committee (COSI) within the Council and by the role of the Minister for Foreign Affairs, who will be a member of the European Commission with responsibility, inter alia, for security matters, including the fight against terrorism; urges the Council and Commission to clarify the scope of competences and possible operational powers envisaged for COSI;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the fact that the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe could already have entered into force (Article IV-447 sets the date of 1 November 2006) and that responsibilities for the security of the European Union would therefore be considerably increased by the establishment of the Internal Strategy Committee (COSI) within the Council and by the role of the Minister for Foreign Affairs, who will be a member of the European Commission with responsibility, inter alia, for security matters, including the fight against terrorism; urges the Council and Commission to clarify the scope of competences and possible operational powers envisaged for COSI;
Invites the Commission to take account of the fact that the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has been set up to advise the Commission on any Community measures affecting the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and privacy;
Invites the Commission to take account of the fact that the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party has been set up to advise the Commission on any Community measures affecting the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and privacy;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the notion of the ‘public interest’ of security research, both for the European Union and the Member States, in order to avoid the risk of funding projects which are not in line with political priorities or with certain public interest or privacy protection obligations, or with the protection of human rights, civil liberties and private life; points out that transparency in the allocation of contracts is of utmost importance;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the notion of the ‘public interest’ of security research, both for the European Union and the Member States, in order to avoid the risk of funding projects which are not in line with political priorities or with certain public interest or privacy protection obligations, or with the protection of human rights, civil liberties and private life; points out that transparency in the allocation of contracts is of utmost importance;
Points out to the Commission that consultation and cooperation with experts from all relevant security research stakeholder groups within the framework of the European Security Research Advisory Board is of value; however, urgently calls for the inclusion of representatives of civil liberties organisations, scientific research bodies, and public institutions on the Advisory Board;
Points out to the Commission that consultation and cooperation with experts from all relevant security research stakeholder groups within the framework of the European Security Research Advisory Board is of value; however, urgently calls for the inclusion of representatives of civil liberties organisations, scientific research bodies, and public institutions on the Advisory Board;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the importance of the interoperability of national and Community systems as a necessary pre-condition for the effective functioning of the solidarity clause inserted into the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which aims to avert the terrorist threat and provide for mutual assistance in the event of terrorist attacks or natural disasters;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the importance of the interoperability of national and Community systems as a necessary pre-condition for the effective functioning of the solidarity clause inserted into the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which aims to avert the terrorist threat and provide for mutual assistance in the event of terrorist attacks or natural disasters;
Calls on the Commission to develop autonomous technology for Europe’s own use which allows for interoperability of systems, in such a way that the Union can free itself of its dependence on third-country technologies;
Calls on the Commission to develop autonomous technology for Europe’s own use which allows for interoperability of systems, in such a way that the Union can free itself of its dependence on third-country technologies;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to study a system of balanced sharing of expenditure on additional resources to be mobilised over and above those provided for in the Community research plan, in order to ensure that the burden of the cost of research takes account of the economic weight of individual Member States, based on a percentage of GNP, and to make commitments over a multiannual period, enabling reliable planning to take place.
Calls on the Council and the Commission to study a system of balanced sharing of expenditure on additional resources to be mobilised over and above those provided for in the Community research plan, in order to ensure that the burden of the cost of research takes account of the economic weight of individual Member States, based on a percentage of GNP, and to make commitments over a multiannual period, enabling reliable planning to take place.
Substitutes under Rule 178(2)
Substitutes under Rule 178(2)
Pētījumi drošības jomā — turpmākie pasākumi
Security Research - The Next Steps
Izskatīšana apakškomitejā
Discussed in sub-committee
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Glyn Ford, Jarom?r Kohl?ček, Alexander Lambsdorff, Pasqualina Napoletano , Rihards Pīks, Aloyzas Sakalas, Pierre Schapira, Inger Segelström
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Glyn Ford, Jaromír Kohlíček, Alexander Lambsdorff, Pasqualina Napoletano, Rihards Pīks, Aloyzas Sakalas, Pierre Schapira, Inger Segelström
*** Piekrišanas procedūra Parlamenta deputātu vairākums, izņemot gadījumus, kas minēti EK Līguma 105., 107., 161. un 300. pantā un ES Līguma 7. pantā
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
– ņemot vērā Komisijas priekšlikumu Eiropas Parlamentam un Padomei ( COM(2004)0098 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0098 )
– ņemot vērā EK Līguma 251. panta 2. punktu un 95. pantu, saskaņā ar kuriem Komisija Parlamentam iesniedza priekšlikumu ( C5‑0081/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5‑0081/2004 ),
– ņemot vērā Vides, sabiedrības veselības un pārtikas nekaitīguma komitejas ziņojumu ( A6‑0104/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0104/2005 ),
4) BaP un citu PAO emisija vidē ir cik vien iespējams jāsamazina.
(4) The emission of BaP and other PAHs into the environment should be reduced as much as possible.
Lai nodrošinātu cilvēku veselības un vides augstu aizsardzības līmeni un lai atbilstīgi 1998. gada protokolam, kas pievienots 1979. gada Konvencijai par pārrobežu gaisa piesārņojumu lielos attālumos ar noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, veicinātu PAO kopējās gada emisijas samazināšanos, šķiet, ir jānosaka ierobežojumi attiecībā uz BaP un dažu citu PAO laišanu tirgū un izmantošanu pildeļļās un riepās;
In order to provide a high level of protection to human health and the environment and to contribute to the reduction of total annual emissions of PAHs as required in the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants, it therefore appears necessary to restrict the placing on the market and the use of BaP and certain other PAHs in extender oils and tyres.
Lai nodrošinātu cilvēku veselības un vides augstu aizsardzības līmeni un lai atbilstīgi 1998. gada protokolam, kas pievienots 1979. gada Konvencijai par pārrobežu gaisa piesārņojumu lielos attālumos ar noturīgiem organiskajiem piesārņotājiem, veicinātu PAO kopējās gada emisijas samazināšanos, šķiet, ir jāierobežo augsta PAO satura pildeļļu un maisījumu, kurus izmanto kā pildeļļas riepu ražošanā, laišana tirgū un izmantošana;
In order to provide a high level of protection to human health and the environment and to contribute to the reduction of total annual emissions of PAHs as required in the 1998 Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Persistent Organic Pollutants, it therefore appears necessary to restrict the placing on the market and the use of PAH-rich extender oils and blends used as extender oils for the production of tyres.