natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Viņš apgalvo, ka sarakstam “Kopā mēs esam stipri”, kas pārstāvēja koalīciju no poļu un krievu minoritāšu reģionālajām partijām, nepiešķīra nevienu deputāta vietu, neskatoties uz to, ka šis saraksts pārvarēja 5 % barjeru, kas pēc Lietuvas vēlēšanu likuma ļauj pretendēt uz deputātu vietām, taču seši citi saraksti savstarpēji sadalīja 13 Lietuvas deputātu vietas.
He complains in particular that the list ‘Together we are strong’, representing a coalition of regional parties of the Polish and Russian minorities, was not allocated a single seat, despite exceeding the 5% threshold for the allocation of seats laid down by Lithuanian electoral law, whereas Lithuania’s 13 seats were divided up among six other lists.
Šāda vietu sadale, ko veica Centrālā vēlēšanu komiteja, esot pretrunā ar 1976. gada Akta 3. pantu, kurš nosaka, ka: “Dalībvalstis var noteikt obligāto slieksni vietu sadalījumam.
He maintains that the allocation of seats made by the Central Electoral Commission was in breach of Article 3 of the 1976 Act according to which, ‘Member States may set a minimum threshold for the allocation of seats.
Valsts līmenī noteiktais slieksnis nedrīkst pārsniegt 5 % no nodotajām balsīm.”
At national level this threshold may not exceed 5% of votes cast’.
Ir jāuzsver, ka ne tikai Akta 3. pants, bet arī 1. panta 1. punkts izvirza noteikumu, ka vēlēšanas notiek, ievērojot proporcionālas pārstāvības principu, izmantojot sarakstu sistēmu vai atsevišķu pārdalāmu balsu sistēmu.
In addition to Article 3, it should be pointed out that Article 1(1) of the Act stipulates that the election, using the list system or the single transferable vote, must be based on proportional representation.
Šis noteikums ir saistošs dalībvalstīm, lai gan tās var ieviest minimālo procentu barjeru (valsts līmeņa vēlēšanās līdz 5 % no nobalsojušo skaita), lai izvairītos no elektorāta sašķelšanās.
This is binding as regards the Member States’ laws, although they may introduce a minimum threshold for the allocation of seats (up to 5% of the votes cast at national level) in order to avoid fragmentation of the electorate.
Tomēr tas nenozīmē, ka Akta 3. pantu var interpretēt tā, ka jebkurš saraksts, kas vēlēšanās ieguvis vairāk nekā 5 % balsu, automātiski iegūst vismaz vienu vietu, jo dalībvalstīs ar mazu vietu skaitu (mazāku nekā 20, kā Lietuvas gadījumā) tas ir matemātiski neiespējami.
However, it does not seem possible to interpret Article 3 of the Act as meaning that any list which exceeds the 5% threshold should be automatically allocated at least one seat, since in the case of Member States with a small number of seats (fewer than 20, as is the case for Lithuania), this is impossible for simple arithmetical reasons.
Galīgā pārbaude, ņemot vērā iesniegtos dokumentus, apliecināja, ka šo sūdzību nevar attaisnot un nav pamata atņemt deputātu mandātus Lietuvā ievēlētajiem deputātiem.
In the final analysis and in the light of the documentation submitted, the complaint cannot be seen as justified and there are no grounds for not validating the mandate of the Members whose election has been notified by Lithuania.
Tādējādi apstrīdējums saskaņā ar 1976. gada Aktu ir jāuzskata par nepamatotu.
The objection should therefore be considered unfounded pursuant to Article 12 of the 1976 Act.
Pilnvaru pārbaudē piemērojamie tiesību akti un procedūras
Legislative and procedural framework governing the verification of credentials
Saskaņā ar 12. panta noteikumiem Aktā par Eiropas Parlamenta pārstāvju ievēlēšanu vispārējās tiešās vēlēšanās, kas ir grozīts ar Padomes 2002. gada 25. jūnija un 22. septembra lēmumu, Eiropas Parlamentam ir jāpārbauda deputātu pilnvaras.
Under the terms of Article 12 of the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, as amended by the Council decision of 25 June/22 September 2002, the European Parliament is required to verify the credentials of its Members.
Šajā nolūkā tas ņem vērā dalībvalstu izziņotos oficiālos rezultātus un izšķir visus strīdus, kas var rasties saistībā ar Akta noteikumiem, izņemot tos strīdus, kas rodas saistībā ar Aktā pieminētiem valstu noteikumiem.
For this purpose, it takes note of the results declared officially by the Member States and rules on any disputes which may arise out of the provisions of the Act, other than those arising out of the national provisions to which the Act refers.
Eiropas Parlamenta Reglamenta 3. un 4. pantā precizē pārbaudes norisi un atbildīgajai komitejai (saskaņā ar Reglamenta VI pielikumu tā ir Juridiskā komiteja) prasa iesniegt ziņojumu Parlamentam par pilnvaru pārbaudi un jebkādiem strīdīgiem jautājumiem.
Rules 3 and 4 of the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure specify the details of the verification process and require the committee concerned (according to Annex VI of the Rules, the Committee on Legal Affairs) to submit a report to Parliament on the verification of credentials and on any disputes.
Šis ziņojums ir par 2004. gada 10. ‑ 13. jūnija Eiropas Parlamenta vēlēšanu rezultātiem, un tas ir balstīts uz katras dalībvalsts oficiālu paziņojumu par vēlēšanu rezultātiem, minot ievēlēto deputātu vārdus, kā arī iespējamo aizstājēju vārdus vēlēšanu rezultātu secībā (Reglamenta 3. panta 2. punkts).
This report therefore relates to the results of the direct elections to the European Parliament held from 10 to 13 June 2004 and is based on the official notifications by all the Member States of the full election results including the names of the elected Members and any substitutes together with their ranking in accordance with the results of the vote (Rule 3(2) of the Rules of Procedure).
Saskaņā ar Akta 5. pantu deputāta amata pilnvaru laiks sākās ar Parlamenta pirmās sesijas atklāšanu 2004. gada 20. jūlijā.
Under the terms of Article 5 of the Act, the term of office of Members began with the opening of the first sitting of Parliament on 20 July 2004.
Saskaņā ar Reglamenta 3. panta 5. punktu deputāti darbojas Parlamentā un tā struktūrvienībās un īsteno visas tiesības, kamēr deputāta pilnvaras nav pārbaudītas vai kamēr nav pieņemts lēmums par attiecīgiem strīdīgiem jautājumiem.
In accordance with Rule 3(5) of the Rules of Procedure, a Member may take his seat in Parliament and on its bodies and enjoy all the rights attaching thereto until such time as his or her credentials have been verified or a ruling given on any dispute.
Tas nozīmē, ka deputātiem viņu tiesības ir pilnā apjomā līdz tam brīdim, kad Parlamenta plenārsēdē pieņem ziņojumu par pilnvaru pārbaudi vai par jebkuru strīdīgu jautājumu.
Accordingly, Members may exercise their rights in full until the adoption in plenary of the report on the verification of credentials or on any disputes.
Reglamenta 3. panta 2. punkts nosaka, ka deputāta mandātu var apstiprināt tikai pēc tam, kad deputāts ir iesniedzis rakstiskas deklarācijas saskaņā ar 1976. gada 20. septembra Akta 7. pantu un Reglamenta I pielikumu.
Rules 3(2) of the Rules of Procedure stipulates that the validity of a Members' mandate may not be confirmed unless the written declarations required on the basis of Article 7 of the Act of 20 September 1976 and Annex I to the Rules of Procedure have been made.
Pirmā deklarācija ir par faktu, ka deputāts neieņem nevienu no amatiem, kas minēti Akta 7. pantā, tas ir, saskaņā ar Kopienas likumiem neveic ar Eiropas Parlamenta deputāta amatu nesavienojamas funkcijas, un otra deklarācija apliecina, ka deputāts neveic profesionālās darbības un jebkuras citas trešo pušu apmaksātas funkcijas vai darbības, kā arī nesaņem finansiālu atbalstu, gan kā darbinieks, gan materiālā veidā, ko nenodrošina Eiropas Parlaments saistībā ar deputāta politiskajām darbībām.
The first of the declarations is to the effect that the Member does not hold any of the offices listed in Article 7 of the Act - offices incompatible with membership of the European Parliament under Community law - and the second details the Members' professional activities, any other remunerated functions or activities, and any support, whether financial or in terms of staff or material, additional to that provided by Parliament in connection with his political activities by third parties.
Šīm deklarācijām jābūt uz divām atsevišķām lapām, kuras deputāti saņem pēc viņu ievēlēšanas.
These declarations have to be made on two separate forms handed to Members after their election.
Tikai deputāts personīgi atbild par deklarācijām, ko viņš(-a) ir sagatavojis(-usi) saskaņā ar savām zināšanām un sirdsapziņu.
Making the declarations is the sole responsibility of the Member, who must make them to the best of his or her knowledge.
Ar 1976. gada Akta grozījumiem, kas stājās spēkā 2004. gada 1. aprīlī, ieviesa jaunus nesavienojamības gadījumus, iekļaujot nesavienojamību ar deputāta pienākumiem valstī (izņemot Īrijas un Apvienotās Karalistes deputātus), kuri jau attiecās uz 2004. gada Parlamenta vēlēšanām.
The amendments to the 1976 Act, which came into force on 1 April 2004, introduced new cases of incompatibility, including in particular incompatibility with membership of a national parliament (except for Members elected in Ireland and the United Kingdom) with effect from the European Parliament elections in 2004.
Jāuzsver arī, ka 1976. gada Akts ir daļa no Eiropas primārajiem tiesību aktiem, un tāpēc Eiropas Savienības iestādēm un dalībvalstīm tas jāievēro.
It should also be pointed out that the 1976 Act constitutes European primary law and as such must be observed by the Union institutions and Member States.
Tas nozīmē, ka Parlamentam ir juridiskas saistības nekavējoties ņemt vērā Akta 7. pantā noteiktos nesavienojamības iemeslus un tad noteikt, ka attiecīgā deputāta vieta ir brīva.
This means that Parliament has a legal obligation to take note immediately of the existence of any of the grounds for incompatibility laid down in Article 7 of the Act and then establish that the seat of the Member concerned is vacant.
Tomēr saskaņā ar Akta noteikumiem nesavienojamību Eiropas mērogā ir jānosaka, izmantojot deputāta pilnvaru pārbaudes procedūru, ko saskaņā ar Reglamentu uzsāk diezgan ilgu laiku pēc Parlamenta pilnvaru termiņa sākuma, un, ņemot vērā attiecīgās komitejas darba organizāciju, tas var ilgt vairākus mēnešus.
Under the provisions of the Act, however, incompatibilities at European level have to be examined during the verification of credentials procedure which, under the Rules of Procedure, only begins well after the opening of Parliament's term of office and, for reasons connected with the organisation of the work of the committee concerned, may last for several months.
Tāpēc ir jāpārskata šo jautājumu nosakošie Reglamenta noteikumi.
The provisions of the Rules of Procedure concerning this issue therefore need to be re-examined.
Reglamenta grozījumu priekšlikums
Proposed changes to the rules
Kā jau iepriekš atzīmēts, pašreizējie Reglamenta noteikumi ir jāatjaunina, lai tie būtu saskaņā ar jaunajiem 1976. gada Akta noteikumiem (īpaši attiecībā uz amatu nesavienojamību).
As explained above, the current provisions of the Rules of Procedure need to be updated to bring them into line with the new provisions of the 1976 Act (particularly as regards incompatibilities).
Daži gadījumi laikā starp diviem Parlamenta sasaukumiem ir uzrādījuši nopietnus juridiskus trūkumus.
In fact, some of the cases which have arisen during the transition from one Parliament to the next have revealed serious legal loopholes:
a) Nesavienojamība saskaņā ar Kopienas tiesību aktiem (piemēram, dubultais deputāta mandāts): vajadzība ievērot 1976. gada Akta 7. panta noteikumus nozīmē to, ka Parlamentam atklāšanas sēdē jālemj par jebkādiem skaidriem un/vai vispārzināmiem amatu nesavienojamības gadījumiem.
(a) Existence of incompatibilities under Community law (e.g. dual parliamentary mandate): the need to comply with the provisions of Article 7 of the 1976 Act means that Parliament has to rule on the existence of any clear and/or commonly known cases of incompatibility at its constituent sitting.
Pašreiz spēkā esošā Reglamenta 3. panta noteikumi Parlamentam neļauj uzsākt deputāta pilnvaru pārbaudi pirms atklāšanas sēdes vai, saskaņā ar pagaidu noteikumu, pat šīs sēdes laikā.
The current provisions of Rule 3 of the Rules of Procedure in practice do not allow Parliament to proceed with the verification of credentials before the constituent sitting or even, as a temporary expedient, during that sitting.
Viens iespējamais risinājums būtu, līdzīgi kā to dara dažu valstu parlamentos, ar šādu jautājumu vērsties pie pagaidu Parlamenta struktūrvienībām (komisijām, ad hoc komitejām, arī pie Parlamenta Prezidija), kuru lēmumu pēc tam ratificētu kompetentā Parlamenta struktūrvienība.
One possible solution, in line with the practice followed in some national parliaments, would be to refer the question to temporary parliamentary bodies (boards, ad hoc committees, provisional bureau) with subsequent ratification by the competent parliamentary body.
b) Ja paziņojums par deputāta ievēlēšanu ir starp pēdējo viena sasaukuma Parlamenta plenārsēdi un nākamā Parlamenta atklāšanas sēdi : Šādos gadījumos (kas attiecās, piemēram, uz vienu deputātu no Maltas iepriekšējā Parlamenta sasaukuma beigās) ir jāatrod alternatīvs risinājums priekšsēdētāja paziņojumam plenārsēdē, ka no dalībvalsts ir saņemts paziņojums.
(b) Giving notice given of the election of a Member during the period between the last plenary sitting of one parliament and the constituent sitting of the next : in cases of this kind (which affected a Maltese Member of Parliament at the end of the last parliament), an alternative needs to be found to the announcement by the President in plenary that notice has been received from a Member State.
Turklāt tas, ka ar šādu paziņojumu par jaunievēlētā deputāta pilnvaru termiņa sākšanos nāk klajā tikai vienu reizi, rada problēmas, ja vairs nav paredzētas plenārsēdes, un tādēļ tās ir jāatrisina, lai ievērotu dalībvalstu tiesības aizvietot (kaut arī tikai uz dažām nedēļām) Parlamenta deputātus, kuru mandāta termiņš ir beidzies.
Apart from the fact that it is only once this announcement has been made that a newly elected Member's term of office actually begins, a solution must be found to the problems which arise when the plenary is no longer meeting in order to respect the right of Member States to replace (if only for a period of a few weeks) Members of Parliament whose term of office has ended.
Ir arī jārada noteikumi, lai pārbaudītu attiecīgo deputātu pilnvaras.
Provision must also be made for the verification of the credentials of the Members in question.
Bez deputātu deklarācijām komiteja var pārbaudīt jebkurus iebildumus, kas balstīti uz 1976. gada Akta noteikumu pārkāpumiem (īpaši 7. pantu), bet tā nevar izskatīt nekādus citus pārkāpumus, īpaši atsevišķu valstu vēlēšanu likumu pārkāpumus.
In addition to the declarations made by Members, the committee may examine any objections based on breaches of the 1976 Act (essentially Article 7), but may not consider any other objections, particularly those based on national electoral law.
Strīdīgie jautājumi ir izskatīti II pielikumā.
Objections are considered in Annex II.
par pilnvaru pārbaudi
Verification of credentials
3., 4, un 9. pants un I pielikums
Rules 3, 4 and 9 and Annex I
Juridiskā komiteja 13.12.2004
JURI 13.12.2004
Giuseppe Gargani 14.09.2004
Giuseppe Gargani 14.9.2004
Maria Berger , Marek Aleksander Czarnecki , Giuseppe Gargani , Klaus - Heiner Lehne , Katalin Lévai , Antonio López - Istúriz White , Antonio Masip Hidalgo , Aloyzas Sakalas , Daniel Stroz , Andrzej Jan Szejna , Nicola Zingaretti , Jaroslav Zvěřina , Tadeusz Zwiefka
Maria Berger, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Aloyzas Sakalas, Daniel Stroz, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Bert Doorn , Evelin Lichtenberger , Arlene McCarthy , Marie Panayotopoulos - Cassiotou , József Szájer
Bert Doorn, Evelin Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, József Szájer
DALĪBVALSTU PAZIŅOJUMI
NOTIFICATION BY THE MEMBER STATES
PE 347.128
PE 347.128v03-00
– ņemot vērā Padomes lēmuma priekšlikumu (KOM(2004) 0577)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0577 )
– ņemot vērā EK līguma 37. pantu saistībā ar 300. panta 2. punktu,
- hving regard to Article 37 in conjunction with Article 300(2) of the EC Treaty,
– ņemot vērā EK līguma 300. panta 3. punkta pirmo daļu, saskaņā ar kuru Padome ar to ir apspriedusies ( C6–0113/2004 ),
– having regard to the Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0113/2004 ),
– ņemot vērā Reglamenta 51. pantu, 43. panta 1. punktu un 83. panta 7. punktu,
– having regard to Rules 51, 43(1) and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ņemot vērā Zivsaimniecības komitejas ziņojumu un Vides, sabiedrības veselības un pārtikas nekaitīguma komitejas atzinumu ( A6-0044/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0044/2004 ),
The Commission proposal concerns the future management of the fisheries resources of the Baltic Sea and the Belts, which are currently regulated by the Convention on Fishing and Conservation 1973 of the living Recourses in the Baltic Sea and the Belts (Gdansk Convention), as well as by the activities of the Internal Baltic Sea Fisheries Commission (IBSFC) established by this Convention.
The Commission proposal concerns the future management of the fisheries resources of the Baltic Sea and the Belts, which are currently regulated by the Convention on Fishing and Conservation 1973 of the living Recourses in the Baltic Sea and the Belts (Gdansk Convention), as well as by the activities of the Internal Baltic Sea Fisheries Commission (IBSFC) established by this Convention.
The main tasks of the IBSFC are the fixing and allocation of annual fishing possibilities for cod, salmon, herring and sprat, as well as the establishment and adoption of technical conservation measures for these fisheries.
The main tasks of the IBSFC are the fixing and allocation of annual fishing possibilities for cod, salmon, herring and sprat, as well as the establishment and adoption of technical conservation measures for these fisheries.
The Baltic Sea waters include no high seas and fall within the scope of national jurisdiction.
The Baltic Sea waters include no high seas and fall within the scope of national jurisdiction.
The areas within the 4 nautical miles from the baselines fall solely within the national jurisdiction.
The areas within the 4 nautical miles from the baselines fall solely within the national jurisdiction.
In addition, fishing within the 4 nautical miles is stipulated by the co-decisions of fishing corporations.
In addition, fishing within the 4 nautical miles is stipulated by the co-decisions of fishing corporations.
This provides the owners of the private waters with some powers to decide on the management of their waters.
This provides the owners of the private waters with some powers to decide on the management of their waters.
Currently, and until 31 December 2005, the parties of the Gdansk Convention are the Community, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and the Russian Federation.
Currently, and until 31 December 2005, the parties of the Gdansk Convention are the Community, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and the Russian Federation.
As a result of the enlargement of the Union, the four new Member States must withdraw from the Gdansk Convention at the date of their accession or at the earliest possible date thereafter (Article 6 of the 2003 Act of accession).
As a result of the enlargement of the Union, the four new Member States must withdraw from the Gdansk Convention at the date of their accession or at the earliest possible date thereafter (Article 6 of the 2003 Act of accession).
A withdrawal notified during 2004 will take effect at the end of 2005 (Article XIX of the Gdansk Convention).
A withdrawal notified during 2004 will take effect at the end of 2005 (Article XIX of the Gdansk Convention).
If the Community does not withdraw from the Convention before the end of 2004, this international convention will become a forum for bilateral activities.
If the Community does not withdraw from the Convention before the end of 2004, this international convention will become a forum for bilateral activities.
In this case, 95 % of the Convention waters would be Community waters.
In this case, 95 % of the Convention waters would be Community waters.
The Commission considers it to be disproportionate and inefficient to have an international fisheries organisation such as the IBSFC as the framework for the bilateral management of the Baltic Sea fishery resources.
The Commission considers it to be disproportionate and inefficient to have an international fisheries organisation such as the IBSFC as the framework for the bilateral management of the Baltic Sea fishery resources.
Therefore the Commission proposes the withdrawal of the Community from the Gdansk Convention.
Therefore the Commission proposes the withdrawal of the Community from the Gdansk Convention.
Instead the Commission proposes a bilateral agreement with the Community and the Russian Federation.
Instead the Commission proposes a bilateral agreement with the Community and the Russian Federation.
This agreement would integrate the existing bilateral agreements between the Russian Federation and Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Sweden within a single bilateral agreement.
This agreement would integrate the existing bilateral agreements between the Russian Federation and Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Sweden within a single bilateral agreement.
In general, the Rapporteur supports the scheme proposed by the Commission.
In general, the Rapporteur supports the scheme proposed by the Commission.
No amendments to the Commission proposal are therefore proposed by the Rapporteur.
No amendments to the Commission proposal are therefore proposed by the Rapporteur.
The Rapporteur emphasizes the importance of reaching a sustainable bilateral agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation, taking care of all the relevant aspects currently included in the management system established by the Gdansk Convention.
The Rapporteur emphasizes the importance of reaching a sustainable bilateral agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation, taking care of all the relevant aspects currently included in the management system established by the Gdansk Convention.
As regards the forthcoming EC Regulation which will amend the fisheries regulations of the IBSFC and transpose them into part of the Community law, the Rapporteur would already like to stress that the current area of application of the existing regulation should not be extended, as this could lead to an additional regulation concerning the coastal fishing of the species of the inland waters (freshwater fish such as perch, pike perch, powan and pike) which do not fall within quotas.
As regards the forthcoming EC Regulation which will amend the fisheries regulations of the IBSFC and transpose them into part of the Community law, the Rapporteur would already like to stress that the current area of application of the existing regulation should not be extended, as this could lead to an additional regulation concerning the coastal fishing of the species of the inland waters (freshwater fish such as perch, pike perch, powan and pike) which do not fall within quotas.
The stipulations of the IBSFC, as well as the Community provisions have so far been limited to the areas outside the 4 nautical miles, and only to the species below quotas.
The stipulations of the IBSFC, as well as the Community provisions have so far been limited to the areas outside the 4 nautical miles, and only to the species below quotas.