natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dalībvalstis, lai nepieļautu nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu, var pieņemt vai paturēt spēkā stingrākus noteikumus jomā, kuru aptver šī direktīva .
The Member States may adopt or retain in force stricter provisions in the field covered by this Directive to prevent money laundering.
Lai nepieļautu nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanu un teroristu finansēšanu , dalībvalstis šīs direktīvas regulētajā jomā var pieņemt vai paturēt stingrākus noteikumus .
The Member States may adopt or retain in force stricter provisions in the field covered by this Directive to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing .
Dalībvalstis aizliedz to finanšu un kredītiestādēm uzturēt anonīmus kontus, anonīmas reģistrācijas vai kontus uz fiktīviem vārdiem .
Member States shall prohibit their credit and financial institutions from keeping anonymous accounts , anonymous passbooks or accounts in fictitious names.
Dalībvalstis aizliedz to finanšu un kredītiestādēm uzturēt anonīmus kontus vai anonīmas krājgrāmatiņas.
Member States shall prohibit their credit and financial institutions from keeping anonymous accounts or anonymous passbooks.
Atkāpjoties no 8. panta 3. punkta, dalībvalstis visos gadījumos nosaka, lai esošo anonīmo kontu vai anonīmo krājgrāmatiņu īpašnieki un labuma guvēji pēc iespējas drīz un visādā gadījumā pirms konti vai grāmatiņas tiek lietoti, tiek pakļauti klientu uzticamības pārbaudei.
By way of derogation from Article 8(3), Member States shall in all cases require that the owners and beneficiaries of existing anonymous accounts or anonymous passbooks shall be submitted to customer due diligence requirements as soon as possible and in any case before the accounts or passbooks are used in any way.
Institūcijām un personām, kuras ietvertas šīs direktīvas ietvaros, jāpiemēro pienācīgās rūpības principa procedūras, pamatojoties uz ticamiem neatkarīgiem primārajiem dokumentiem, datiem vai informāciju , sekojošos gadījumos:
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive shall apply customer due diligence procedures on the basis of reliable independent source documents, data or information in the following cases:
Iestādes un personas, uz kurām attiecas šī direktīva, piemēro klientu uzticamības pārbaudes procedūras šādos gadījumos:
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive shall apply customer due diligence procedures in the following cases:
Basic provision governing the key customer due diligence obligation imposed on all institutions and persons coming under this Directive.
Basic provision governing the key customer due diligence obligation imposed on all institutions and persons coming under this Directive.
In accordance with a risk-based approach, the reliable independent source documents specified by the Commission are rarely available, particularly in the case of legal entities, and would be impossible to obtain or could be obtained only at disproportionate expense.
In accordance with a risk-based approach, the reliable independent source documents specified by the Commission are rarely available, particularly in the case of legal entities, and would be impossible to obtain or could be obtained only at disproportionate expense.
Consequently, it should be left up to those concerned to determine how they comply with their customer due diligence obligation.
Consequently, it should be left up to those concerned to determine how they comply with their customer due diligence obligation.
Detailed provisions must in any case be left to the Member States, which can include them in the publication obligations they impose on legal entities.
Detailed provisions must in any case be left to the Member States, which can include them in the publication obligations they impose on legal entities.
c) ja pastāv aizdomas par nelegālu līdzekļu legalizēšanu, neatkarīgi ne no kādas samazinājuma, izņēmuma vai līmeņa ;
(c) when there is a suspicion of money laundering, regardless of any derogation, exemption or threshold;
c) ja pastāv aizdomas par nelegālu līdzekļu legalizēšanu vai teroristu finansēšanu , neatkarīgi no izņēmumiem, atbrīvojumiem vai robežvērtības .
(c) when there is a suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing , regardless of any derogation, exemption or threshold;
7. panta 1. punkta a) apakšpunkts
Article 7, paragraph 1, point (a)
a) klienta identifikāciju un klienta identitātes pārbaudi;
(a) identifying the customer and verifying the customer’s identity;
a) klienta identifikāciju un klienta identitātes pārbaudi, izmantojot dokumentus, ziņas vai informāciju, kas iegūta no uzticama un neatkatrīga avota ;
(a) identifying the customer and verifying the customer´s identity on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent source ;
7. panta 1. punkta b) apakšpunkts
Article 7, paragraph 1, point (b)
b) ī stenā īpašnieka, kur tas iespējams , identifikāciju, kā arī pamatotu pasākumu piemērošanu, lai pārliecinātos par īstenā īpašnieka identitāti, tā, lai organizācija vai persona ir pārliecināta, ka tā zina, kas ir īstenais īpašnieks, ieskaitot , attiecībā uz juridiskajām personām, trestus un citas juridiskās organizācijas , pielietojot pamatotus pasākumus, lai saprastu klienta īpašnieka tiesību un kontroles struktūru;
(b) identifying, where applicable, the beneficial owner and taking reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner such that the institution or person is satisfied that it knows who the beneficial owner is, including, as regards legal persons, trusts and similar legal arrangements, taking reasonable measures to understand the ownership and control structure of the customer;
b) atbilstīgos gadījumos – īpašuma beneficiāra identifikāciju, kā arī atbilstīgu un atkarībā no riska pakāpes izraudzītu pasākumu piemērošanu, lai pārbaudītu viņa identitāti, tā, lai iestāde vai persona ir pārliecināta, ka tā zina, kas ir ī pašuma beneficiārs, tostarp attiecībā uz juridiskajām personām, trastiem un līdzīgām līgumsabiedrībām , piemērojot atbilstīgus un atkarībā no riska pakāpes izraudzītus pasākumus, lai saprastu klienta īpašuma un kontroles struktūru;
(b) identifying, where applicable, the beneficial owner and taking risk-based and adequate measures to verify his identity such that the institution or person is satisfied that it knows who the beneficial owner is, including, as regards legal persons, trusts and similar legal arrangements, taking risk-based and adequate measures to understand the ownership and control structure of the customer;
7. panta 1. punkta ba) apakšpunkts
Article 7, paragraph 1, point (b a) (new)
ba) īpašnieku vai juridisko saistību dokumentācijas trūkuma gadījumā, lai deklarētu īpašuma beneficāru, šis pienākums tiks uzskatīts par izpildītu, ja būs pārbaudīti publiski pieejami avoti, klients būs pienācīgi iztaujāts un godprātīgi pieņemts lēmums, ņemot vērā iespējamo risku.
(ba) In the absence of a record of owners or a legal obligation to declare beneficial ownership, this duty shall be regarded as discharged when publicly available sources of information have been consulted, reasonable questioning of the customer conducted, and a judgement made in good faith taking account of the perceived risk.
Atbildība iestājas tikai gadījumos, kad pieļauta uzkrītoša un acīm redzama nolaidība identifikācijas pasākumos;
Liability shall only arise in the case of blatant and obvious omissions in identification efforts.
It is unreasonable to impose a strict duty in the absence of a register of ownership or a legal obligation to declare beneficial ownership
It is unreasonable to impose a strict duty in the absence of a register of ownership or a legal obligation to declare beneficial ownership.
7. panta 1. punkta d) apakšpunkts
Article 7, paragraph 1, point (d)
d) pienācīgās rūpības par notiekošu biznesa attiecību kārtošana , ieskaitot šo attiecību gaitā veikto transakciju pārbaudi, lai nodrošinātu, ka transakcijas ir kārtotas saskaņā ar to, ka institūcija vai persona pazīst klientu, biznesa un riska profilu, ieskaitot, ja nepieciešams, fondu izcelsmi, un nodrošinot, ka uzglabātie dokumenti, dati vai informācija tiek atjaunoti.
(d) conducting ongoing due diligence on the business relationship including scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the institution’s or person’s knowledge of the customer, the business and risk profile, including, where necessary, the source of funds and ensuring that the documents, data or information held are kept up-to-date.
d) darījumu attiecību uzraudzība , ieskaitot šo attiecību gaitā veikto darījumu pārbaudi, lai nodrošinātu, ka darījumi ir kārtoti saskaņā ar to, ka institūcija vai persona pazīst klientu, viņa darījumus un riska profilu, ieskaitot, ja nepieciešams, līdzekļu izcelsmi, un nodrošinot, ka uzglabātie dokumenti, dati vai informācija tiek atjaunoti.
(d) conducting ongoing monitoring of the business relationship including scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions being conducted are consistent with the institution’s or person’s knowledge of the customer, the business and risk profile, including, where necessary, the source of funds and ensuring that the documents, data or information held are kept up-to-date.
Institūcijas vai personas, kas ietvertas šajā direktīvā , katram klientam piemēro pienācīgās rūpības prasības , kas minētas 1. punktā, bet var noteikt šādu pasākumu apjomu, pamatojoties uz riska jūtīgumu , atkarībā no klienta, biznesa attiecību, produkta vai transakcijas veida.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive shall apply each of the customer due diligence requirements in paragraph 1, but may determine the extent of such measures on a risk-sensitive basis depending on the type of customer, business relationship, product or transaction.
Iestādes vai personas, uz kurām attiecas šī direktīva , katram klientam piemēro uzticamības pārbaudi , kas minēta 1. punktā, bet var noteikt šādu pasākumu apjomu, pamatojoties uz riska pakāpi atkarībā no klienta, darījumu attiecību, produkta vai darījumu veida.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive shall apply each of the customer due diligence requirements in paragraph 1, but may determine the extent of such measures on a risk-sensitive basis depending on the type of customer, business relationship, product or transaction.
Iestādēm un personām, uz kurām attiecas šī direktīva, ir jāpierāda 33. pantā minētajām iestādēm, ieskaitot pašpārvaldes iestādes, ka pasākumu apjoms attiecībā uznelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanas un terorisma finansēšanas riskiem ir atbilstīgs.
The institutions and persons covered by this Directive should be able to demonstrate to the authorities mentioned in Article 33, including self-regulatory bodies, that the extent of the measures is appropriate in view of the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing.
The emphasis on a risk-based approach also includes a degree of discretion for those covered by these obligations.
The emphasis on a risk-based approach also includes a degree of discretion for those covered by these obligations.
Consequently, it is reasonable to require them to justify and document their risk-based decisions.
Consequently, it is reasonable to require them to justify and document their risk-based decisions.
Dalībvalstis pieprasa, ka institūcijas un personas, kuras pakļautas šai direktīvai, piemēro klientu pienācīgo rūpību pirms vai biznesa attiecību nodibināšanas laikā, vai izpildot gadījuma rakstura klientu transakcijas .
Member States shall require that the institutions and persons covered by this Directive apply customer due diligence before or during the course of establishing a business relationship or executing a transaction for occasional customers .
Dalībvalstis nodrošina, ka klientu un īpašuma beneficiāru identifikācija notiek pirms darījumu attiecību uzsākšanas vai pirms darījuma veikšanas .
Member States shall require that the verification of the identity of the customer and the beneficial owner takes place before the establishment of a business relationship or the execution of a transaction .
In principle, the identity should be verified before a business relationship is established and, in any case, before any financial transaction is carried out.
In principle, the identity should be verified before a business relationship is established and, in any case, before any financial transaction is carried out.
1.a Atkāpjoties no 1. punkta, dalībvalstis ir tiesīgas pieļaut, ka klienta un īpašuma beneficiāra identitātes pārbaude notiek darījuma attiecību dibināšanas laikā, ja tas izrādās nepieciešami, lai nepārtrauktu darījuma normālu norisi, un ja nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanas vai terorisma finansēšanas risks ir neliels.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may allow the verification of the identity of the customer and the beneficial owner to be completed during the establishment of a business relationship if this is necessary not to interrupt the normal conduct of business and where there is little risk of money laundering or terrorist financing occurring.
Šajā gadījumā šīs provcedūras ir jāpabeidz iespējami drīz pēc pirmās tikšanās.
In such situations these procedures should be completed as soon as practicable after the initial contact.
8. panta 1.b punkts (jauns)
Article 8, paragraph 1 b (new)
Šādos gadījumos pārbaudei jānotiek izmaksas laikā vai pirms tās vai tad, kad attlīdzības saņēmējs gatavojas izmantot polisē paredzētās tiesības vai arī pirms tam.
In all such cases verification should take place at or before the time of payout or at or before the time the beneficiary intends to exercise rights vested under the policy.
In the case of life insurance, it is obviously not the establishment of the business relationship (conclusion of the insurance contract), but the related financial transaction (payout of life assurance policy) that is the key element involving a risk of money laundering.
In the case of life insurance, it is obviously not the establishment of the business relationship (conclusion of the insurance contract), but the related financial transaction (payout of life assurance policy) that is the key element involving a risk of money laundering.
Consequently, it has been spelt out that identity must have been reliably verified at the time of the financial transaction.
Consequently, it has been spelt out that identity must have been reliably verified at the time of the financial transaction.
Dalībvalstis pieprasa, ka, gadījumā, ja institūcija vai persona, kas ir iesaistīta, nav spējīga izpildīt 7. panta 1. punkta a), b) un c) daļas prasības, tā nedrīkst atvērt kontu, nodibināt biznesa attiecības vai izpildīt transakciju , vai arī tai jāpārtrauc biznesa attiecības, un jāapsver iespēja ziņot finansiālās izmeklēšanas vienībai, saskaņā ar 19. panta prasībām attiecībā par klientu.
Member States shall require that, where the institution or person concerned is unable to comply with points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 7(1), it may not open the account , establish a business relationship or perform the transaction, or shall terminate the business relationship, and shall consider making a report to the financial intelligence unit in accordance with Article 19 in relation to the customer.
Dalībvalstis nodrošina , ka gadījumā, ja attiecīgā iestāde vai persona nespēj izpildīt prasības , kas noteiktas 7. panta 1. punkta a), b) un c) apakšpunktā , lai noteiktu klienta identitāti , tā drīkst atvērt kontu tikai tad, ja ir atbilstīgs apliecinājums, ka finanšu darījums klienta uzdevumā netiek veikts, kamēr nav pilnībā noskaidrots, vai viss atbilst iepriekšminētajām prasībām ; ja iepriekšminētās prasības netiek ievērotas arī turpmāk, attiecīgā iestāde vai persona nedrīkst nodibināt darījumu attiecības vai veikt jebkādus darījumus , vai arī tai ir jāpārtrauc darījumu attiecības un jāgatavo ziņojums par klientu finanšu ziņu vākšanas vienībai saskaņā ar 19. pantu.
Member States shall require that, where the institution or person concerned is unable to meet the obligations to determine customer identity in accordance with points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 7(1), it may only open an account provided there are adequate safeguards in place to ensure that financial transactions are not performed on behalf of the client until final clarification on the basis of full compliance with the aforementioned provisions is obtained; in the event of continued non-compliance with the aforementioned provisions, the institution or person concerned shall not establish a business relationship or perform any transaction, or shall terminate the business relationship, and shall consider making a report to the financial intelligence unit in accordance with Article 19 in relation to the customer.
Dalībvalstīm šis noteikums nav jāpiemēro attiecībā uz notāriem, neatkarīgajiem juristiem, audotoriem, ārējus pakalpojumus sniedzošiem grāmatvežiem un nodokļu konsultantiem, kad tie pārbauda savu klientu juridisko situāciju vai kad tie aizstāv vai pārstāv savus klientus, tostarp sniedzot konsultācijas par procesa uzsākšanu vai izvairīšanos no tā.
Member States shall not be obliged to apply this provision in situations when notaries, independent legal professionals, auditors, external accountants and tax advisors are in the course of ascertaining the legal position for their client or performing their task of defending or representing that client in, or concerning judicial proceedings, including advice on instituting or avoiding proceedings.
Dalībvalstis pieprasa , ka visi kazino klienti ir jāidentificē un to identitāte jāpārbauda, ja tie iegādājas vai maina spēļu kauliņus , kuru vērtība ir 1000 EUR vai lielāka.
Member States shall require that all casino customers shall be identified and the identity verified if they purchase or exchange gambling chips with a value of EUR 1 000 or more.
Dalībvalstis nodrošina , ka visi kazino klienti ir jāidentificē un to identitāte jāpārbauda, ja tie iegādājas vai maina spēļu žetonus , kuru vērtība ir 3000 EUR vai lielāka.
Member States shall require that all casino customers shall be identified and the identity verified if they purchase or exchange gambling chips with a value of EUR 3 000 or more.
For practical reasons and in line with a risk-based approach, a threshold of €3000 is appropriate for customer identification.
For practical reasons and in line with a risk-based approach, a threshold of €3 000 is appropriate for customer identification.
Atkāpjoties no 6. panta a, b un d apakšpunkta, 7. panta un 8. panta 1. apakšpunkta, uz iestādēm un personām, uz kurām attiecas šī direktīva, neattiecas minēto pantu noteikumi, ja klients ir kredītiestāde vai finanšu iestāde, uz kuru attiecas šī direktīva, vai tādā trešā valstī esoša kredītiestāde vai finanšu iestāde, kura izvirza šai direktīvai ekvivalentas prasības un kurā pāraruga šo prasību ievērošanu.
By way of derogation from Articles 6(a), (b) and (d), 7 and 8(1), the institutions and persons subject to this Directive shall not be subject to the requirements provided for in those Articles where the customer is a credit or financial institution covered by this Directive, or a credit or financial institution situated in a third country which imposes equivalent requirements to those laid down by this Directive and are supervised for compliance with those requirements.
Individuals may also be subject to the simplified customer due diligence obligations if their activities comply with the relevant requirements of the Directive
Individuals may also be subject to the simplified customer due diligence obligations if their activities comply with the relevant requirements of the Directive.
10. panta 1. punkta ievaddaļa
Article 10, paragraph 1, introductory part
Dalībvalstis, atkāpjoties no 6., 7. panta un 8. panta 2. punkta, var atļaut institūcijām un personām, kuras pakļautas šai direktīvai , nepiemērot klientu pienācīgās rūpības principu attiecībā uz klientiem, kuri pārstāv neliela riska varbūtību nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanai, konkrēti :
By way of derogation from Articles 6, 7 and 8(2) Member States may allow the institutions and persons covered by this Directive not to apply customer due diligence in respect of customers who represent a low risk of money laundering, such as :
Atkāpjoties no 6. panta a), b) un d) apakšpunkta, 7. panta un 8. panta 1. punkta , dalībvalstis var atļaut iestādēm un personām, uz kurām attiecas šī direktīva , nepiemērot klientu uzticamības pārbaudi attiecībā uz:
By way of derogation from Articles 6(a), (b) and (d), 7 and 8(1) Member States may allow the institutions and persons covered by this Directive not to apply customer due diligence in respect of:
a) dalībvalstu vai trešo valstu finanšu un kredītiestādēm, ja tās atbilst prasībām cīņas pret nelegālo līdzekļu legalizēšanu starptautiskajiem standartiem, kā arī, ja tās tiek pārraudzītas saskaņā ar šīm prasībām;
(a) credit and financial institutions from the Member States, or from third countries provided that they are subject to requirements to combat money laundering consistent with international standards and are supervised for compliance with those requirements;
10. panta 1. punkta c) apakšpunkts
Article 10, paragraph 1, point (c)
c) kopēju rēķinu , kurus pārvalda notāri vai citi neatkarīgie juridiskie profesionāļi, īstenie īpašnieki no dalībvalstīm vai trešām valstīm, ja tie atbilst prasībām cīņas pret nelegālo līdzekļu legalizēšanu starptautiskajiem standartiem, kā arī, ja tie tiek pārraudzīti saskaņā ar šīm prasībām.
(c) beneficial owners of pooled accounts held by notaries and other independent legal professionals from the Member States, or from third countries provided that they are subject to requirements to combat money laundering consistent with international standards and are supervised for compliance with those requirements.
c) īpašuma beneficiāriem, kuru kopējos kontus pārvalda notāri vai citi neatkarīgie juristi no dalībvalstīm vai trešām valstīm, ja uz tiem attiecas prasības par nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanas vai teroristu finansēšanas apkarošanu, kuras atbilst starptautiskiem standartiem un ja pārrauga, vai tie izpilda šīs prasības , kā arī ja informācija par īpašuma beneficiāriem ir pieejama pēc to iestāžu pieprasījuma, kurās glabājas kopējie konti .
(c) beneficial owners of pooled accounts held by notaries and other independent legal professionals from the Member States, or from third countries provided that they are subject to requirements to combat money laundering or terrorist financing consistent with international standards and are supervised for compliance with those requirements and provided that the information on the identity of the beneficial owner is available on request to the institutions that act as depository institutions for the pooled accounts;
10. panta 1. punkta ca) apakšpunkts (jauns)
Article 10, paragraph 1, point (c a) (new)
ca) dalībvalstu valsts iestādēm;
(ca) domestic public authorities;
10. panta 1. punkta beigu daļa (jauna)
Article 10, paragraph 1, closing part (new)
vai arī attiecībā uz klientiem, kuru gadījumā pastāv neliels nelegāli iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšanas vai terorisma finansēšanas risks un kuri atbilst tehniskajiem kritērijiem, kas noteikti saskaņā ar 37. panta 1. punkta b) apakšpunktu.
or in respect of any other customer representing a low risk of money laundering or terrorist financing which meets the technical criteria established in accordance with Article 37(1)(b).
10. panta 1. punkta a) apakšpunkts (jauns)
Article 10, paragraph 1 a (new)
Gadījumos, kas minēti -1. un 1. punktā, personām un iestādēm noteikti jāiegūst pietiekama informācija, lai konstatētu, vai uz klientu attiecas minētajos punktos noteiktie izņēmumi.
In the cases mentioned in paragraphs -1 and 1, persons and institutions shall in any case gather sufficient information to establish if the customer qualifies for an exemption as mentioned in these paragraphs.
Dalībvalstis un Komisija informē viena otru par gadījumiem, kad tās uzskata, ka trešā valsts neatbilst noteikumiem, kas ietverti 1. punkta a), b) vai c) daļā .
The Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where they consider that a third country does not meet the conditions laid down in paragraph 1(a), (b) or (c).