natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commis-sion has not substantially changed the objectives, the mechanisms or the targets of the Daphne programme, but it has proposed a number of improvements with a view to enhanc-ing the impact of the programme.
A Bizottsèg lïnyegïben nem vèltoztatta meg a Daphne program cïlkit｀zïseit, mecha-nizmusait vagy cïlkûzûnsïgït, de szèmos fejlesztïst javasolt a program hatèsènak fokozè-sèra.
(a) An important improvement is the increase of the budget: EUR 50 million will be available for the period 2004›08, compared with EUR 20 million of the «rstprogramme.Anincreasein the budget is necessary in order to face both the consequences of enlargement to cen-tral and east European countries and the large demand from organisations in order to at least reduce frustration that sometimes appears among the applicants.
a) Az egyik fontos elﾒrelïpïs a kûltsïgvetïs emelïse: 50 milliù euro èll majd rendelkezïsre a 2004›2008 kûzûtti idﾒszakra, szemben azzal a 20 milliù eurùval, amellyel az elsﾒ program gazdèlkodhatott. A kûltsïgvetïsi keret emelïse elengedhetetlen ahhoz, hogy a program meg tudjon felelni a kûzïp- ïs kelet-eurùpai orszègok csatlakozèsèval jèrù kihóvèsnak, valamint a szervezetek komoly igïnyïnek, hogy legalèbb enyhótsïk a csatlakozni kóvènù orszègok kû-rïben olykor mutatkozù tèvolsègtartèst a programmal kapcsolatban.
Daphne II is pro-posed for a period of « v e y e a r s . T h i s p r o v i d e s a n a n n u a l bu d g e t o f E U R 1 0 m i l l i o n i n s t e a d o f EUR 5 million.
A Daphne II ûtïves idﾒ-szakra szùl, ógy 5 milliù euro helyett 10 milliù eurùs ïves kûltsïgvetïst biztosót.
(b) The second improvement is the list of activities that can be supported.
b) A mèsodik elﾒrelïpïs a tèmogathatù tevïkenysïgek sora.
The Daphne II pro-gramme is more exhaustive, compared with Daphne I, about the types of activity, the ar-eas of action, which can be funded.
A Daphne II program a Daphne I-nïl sokkal rïszletesebben tartalmazza a «nanszórozhatùtevïkenysïgtópusokatïsafellï-pïsi t e r Ÿ l e t e k e t .
It is foreseen that the programme comprise the fol-lowing types of activities:
A program vèrhatùan a kûvetkezﾒ tópusÿ tevïkenysïgekre terjed ki:
‡ identi«cationandexchangesofgoodpracticeandworkexperiencewithaviewinparticular to implementing preventive measures and assistance to victims;
‡ a bevèlt gyakorlatok ïs munkatapasztalatok azonosótèsa ïs cserïje, k Ÿ l û n û s tekintettel a megelﾒzﾒ intïzkedïsek ïs az èldozatok segótïsïnek gyakorlati megvalùsótèsèra;
‡ mapping surveys, studies and research;
‡ feltïrkïpezﾒ cïlÿ felmïrïsek, tanulmènyok ïs kutatès;
«eldworkwiththeinvolvementofthebene«ciaries,particularlychildrenandyouth,in all phases of project design, implementation and evaluation;
A ‡gyermekek· ês ‡#atalok·kõzõttimegkülõnbõztetês mêg nem egyêrtelm╆.
‡ creation of sustainable multidisciplinary networks; more broadly de#nedtore$ectprevailingnational attitudes and legislation, and generally ranges from around 16 to 25 years of age.
A gyakorlatban a legtõbb projekt a gyermekek jogaival foglalkozó ENSZ-egyezmênyt kõveti, amikor azt mondja, hogy mindenki gyermeknek szâmît, aki mêg nem tõltõtte be 18. êletêvêt.
Clearly this also overlaps into `adulthood' as generally de#ned.葵isre$ectsthe general confusion about when childhood ends and adulthood begins, and the fact that in most programming worldwide people moving from one into the other ̋ adolescents or young people ̋ are o挨enoverlookedbecause they are too d i L c u l t t o c a t e g o r i s e . 葵 e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe has taken a pragmatic approach to this and, in not imposing de#nitions,has le挨ittotheindividual projects to #nda`comfortableplace' between national needs and international frameworks.
A ‡#atalok·ugyanakkor egy szêlesebb kõr╆, a meglêv┸ nemzeti attit╆dõket ês tõrvênyalkotâst tükrõz┸ meghatârozâs, amely âltalâban 15«25 êves korcsoportra vonatkozik.
‡ training and design of educational packages;
Mivel az âltalânos meghatârozâs szerint ez a korcsoport mâr âtnyúlik a ‡feln┸ttkorba·, sok a zavar azzal kapcsolatban, hogy mikor vêgz┸dik a gyermekkor, ês mikor kezd┸dik a feln┸ttkor.
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes and support for victims and people at risk, including children and young people who witness domestic violence;
‡ helyszóni munka a kedvezmïnyezettek, k Ÿ l û n û s e n gyermekek ïs «atalokbevonèsèval,aprojekt tervezïsïnek, gyakorlati megvalùsótèsènak ïs ïrtïkelïsïnek ûsszes fèzisèban;
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes for perpetrators, whilst ensuring the safety of victims and children;
‡ kezelïsi ïs tèmogatèsi programok kidolgozèsa ïs gyakorlati megvalùsótèsa az elkûvetﾒk rïszïre, az èldozatok biztonsègènak biztosótèsa mellett;
‡ development and implementation of awareness-raising activities targeted to speci«caudi-ences, design of materials to supplement those already available, or adaptation and use of existing materials in other geographical areas or for other target groups;
‡ speci«kuscïlkûzûnsïgerﾒszakrùlvalùtèjïkozottsègènaknûvelïsïtcïlzùtevïkenysïgekkidolgozèsa ïs gyakorlati megvalùsótèsa, a mèr rendelkezïsre èllùkat kiegïszótﾒ anyagok kidolgozèsa, illetve mès fûldrajzi helyen vagy mès cïlcsoport szèmèra kïszótett meglïvﾒ anyagok ètdolgozèsa ïs felhasznèlèsa;
‡ dissemination of the results obtained under the Daphne I and II programmes including their adaptation, transfer and use by other bene«ciariesorinothergeographicalareas;
‡ a Daphne I ïs II program keretïben elïrt eredmïnyek terjesztïse, beleïrtve azok alkalma-zèsèt, ètadèsèt ïs mès kedvezmïnyezettek èltal vagy mès fûldrajzi t e r Ÿ l e t e k e n tûrtïnﾒ hasznèlatèt;
‡ assessment and development of activities contributing to positive treatment for people vulnerable to violence, that is to an approach which encourages respect for them and pro-motes their well-being and self-ful«lment.
‡ az erﾒszakkal szemben s ï r Ÿ l ï k e n y szemïlyek pozitóv kezelïsïhez hozzèjèrulù tevïkeny-sïgek felmïrïse ïs kifejlesztïse, konkrïtan: mèsok èltali e l i s m e r ï s Ÿ k , valamint ûnmaguk-kal valù e l ï g e d e t t s ï g Ÿ k ïs kiegyensÿlyozottsèguk elïrïsït cïlzù tevïkenysïgekï.
(c) The Commission has also set aside around 15 % of the budget of the programme in order to enable the Commission to improve the programme's impact and to play a more proac-tive rule with a view to the dissemination of good practices. Activities to be covered are threefold.
c) A Bizottsèg a program kûltsïgvetïsïnek k û r Ÿ l b e l Ÿ l 15%-èt szènja a program hatïkonysè-gènak nûvelïsïre, illetve arra, hogy a Bizottsèg a jelenleginïl is kezdemïnyezﾒbb szerepet jètsszon a bevèlt gyakorlat terjesztïsïben.
A «rstaxisistodevelopindicatorsonviolence,sothatthequanti«edimpactofpolicies and projects can be measured.
Itt hèrom t e r Ÿ l e t e t kell ïrinteni: elﾒszûr muta-tùkat kell lïtrehozni az erﾒszakrùl, hogy az eljèrèsmùdok ïs a projektek szèmszer｀sótett hatèsa mïrhetﾒ legyen.
In complement to these indicators, it will seek to set up a procedure for regular and sustainable data collection, preferably with the assist-ance of Eurostat, in order to be able to quantify violence in the Union more accurately.
Ezen erﾒszakmutatùk mellï a Bizottsèg, lehetﾒleg az Eurostat se-gótsïgïvel, eljèrèst dolgoz ki a rendszeres ïs fenntarthatù adatgy｀jtïsre, hogy az Uniùban elﾒfordulù erﾒszak pontosabban szèmszer｀sóthetﾒ legyen.
A second axis will be to extract and deduce policy issues, wherever possible, from the work achieved by funded projects, with the aim of suggesting common policies on violence at Community level and reinforcing judicial practice.
A munka mèsodik lïpïsekïnt a Bizottsèg › amennyiben ez lehetsïges › ûsszegy｀jti a «nanszórozottprojektekkeretïbenmegvalùsótott munka eredmïnyeit, azzal a cïllal, hogy belﾒle az erﾒszakra vonatkozùan kûzûs eljèrèsmùdot fogalmazzon meg kûzûssïgi szinten, ïs megerﾒsótse az i g a z s è g Ÿ g y i gyakorlatot.
Finally, the third axis would be to dis-seminate, on a Europe-wide scale, good practices stemming from funded projects.
V ï g Ÿ l a munka harmadik fèzisa a «nanszórozottprojektekbﾒlszèrmazùbevèltgyakorlat terjesztïse lesz eurùpai szinten.
The Daphne initiative in 1997, 1998 and 1999
A Daphne kezdemïnyezïs hèrom ïve: 1997, 1998 ïs 1999
In the « r s tffy e a r o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e ( 1 9 9 7 ) , t h e c a l l f o r p r o po s a l s w a s f a i r l y s p e c i « cffo n priority actions to be taken:
A Daphne kezdemïnyezïs elsﾒ ïvïben (1997-ben), az ajènlatkïrïs meglehetﾒsen egyedi mù-don fogalmazta meg a prioritèsos intïzkedïseket:
‡ setting up networks or reinforcement of networks at European level to promote and coor-dinate information and actions on measures aimed at protecting, and preventing violence towards children, young people and women, including the promotion of cooperation be-tween NGOs and voluntary organisations and authorities involved in these areas;
‡ hèlùzatok lïtrehozèsa vagy megerﾒsótïse eurùpai szinten az olyan intïzkedïsekrﾒl szùlù informèciùk ïs fellïpïsek elﾒsegótïsïre ïs ûsszehangolèsèra, melyek cïlja a gyermekek, « a t a l o k ï s n ﾒ k v ï d e l m e , v a l a m i n t a z e l l e n Ÿ k i r è n y u l ù e r ﾒ s z a k m e g a k a d è l y o z è s a , b e l e ï r t v e a nem kormènyzati ïs ûnkïntes szervezetek ïs az e t e r Ÿ l e t t e l foglalkozù hatùsègok e g y Ÿ t t - m ｀ k û d ï s ï n e k elﾒsegótïsït;
‡ promotion of the establishment of a `child helpline' on a similar basis in every Member State;
‡ valamennyi tagèllamban hasonlù alapon m｀kûdﾒ ¶gyermeksegïlyvonal• kialakótèsènak tèmogatèsa;
‡ special measures at European level for the protection of children, young people and wom-en, with primary consideration being given to them in all actions concerning them, their rights being enjoyed without discrimination of any kind;
‡ eurùpai szint｀ k Ÿ l û n l e g e s intïzkedïsek a gyermekek, «atalokïsnﾒkvïdelmïre.Ezenin-tïzkedïsek sorèn a gyermekek, a «atalokïsanﾒkmindenﾒketïrintﾒfellïpïskapcsènelsﾒdleges « g y e l m e t ï l v e z n e k , ï s j o g a i k a t b è r m i l y e n h è t r è n y o s m e g k Ÿ l û n b û z t e t ï s n ï l k Ÿ l ï l v e z h e t i k ;
‡ prevention and protection of children, young people and women from all kinds of violence and commercial sexual exploitation, tra/ckingandotherabuse;
‡ a gyermekek, «atalokïsnﾒkvïdelmemindenfïleerﾒszakosïskereskedelmicïlÿszexuè-lis kizsèkmènyolès, a v e l Ÿ k valù kereskedelem ïs mès erﾒszak ellen, valamint ezek megelﾒ-zïse;
‡ actions aimed at tackling international paedophile rings;
‡ fellïpïsek a nemzetkûzi pedo«lhèlùzatokfelszèmolèsèra;
‡ pilot projects and subsidies to NGOs or voluntary organisations working towards these aims, in particular working for the rights and the protection of children, young people and women, in particular regarding sexual abuse.
‡ kósïrleti projektek ïs tèmogatèsok juttatèsa az e cïl elïrïsïïrt fèradozù › k Ÿ l û n û s e n a gyermekek, «atalokïsnﾒkjogaiïrtïsvïdelmïben,illetveaszexuèlisbèntalmazèsfelszè-molèsèïrt tevïkenykedﾒ › nem kormènyzati vagy ûnkïntes szervezeteknek.
The 1997 priorities clearly re‹ectedthepoliticalimpetusbehindtheinitiativeinthewakeofthe `Dutroux a . a i r ' i n B e l g i u m a n d t h e W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a - t i o n of Children.
Az 1997. ïvi prioritèsok egyïrtelm｀en t Ÿ k r û z t ï k a kezdemïnyezïs mûgûtti politikai l e n d Ÿ l e - t e t , amelyet a ¶Dutroux-Ÿgy• ïs a gyermekek szexuèlis kizsèkmènyolèsa elleni vilègkongresz-szus vèltott ki Belgiumban.
Sexual violence is mentioned in three of the six stated measures and the call for actions `aimed at tackling international paedophile rings' is a clear if unrealistic echo of public and political concerns of the time.
A szexuèlis erﾒszakot a hat kijelûlt intïzkedïs k û z Ÿ l hèromban emlótik, ïs a ¶nemzetkûzi pedo«lhèlùzatokfelszèmolèsèt•cïlzùfellïpïsrevalùfelhóvèsvilègos,mïgha nem is reèlis visszhangja napjaink kûzïleti ïs politikai aggèlyainak.
In fact, it was unlikely that NGOs would consider themselves as the appropriate instigators of actions targeting international paedophile rings and indeed it is unlikely that the selection panel formed to review the submissions would have looked favourably on any project that demonstrated ignorance of the limits of NGO actions in what is clearly primarily a police investigation and law-enforcement task.
A nem kormèny-zati szervezetek megótïlïse szerint nem ﾒk a nemzetkûzi pedo«lkûrûkelleniharcarraalkalmasszorgalmazùi. Mïg kevïsbï valùszón｀, hogy a pèlyèzatok elbórèlèsèra lïtrehozott v è l a s z t ù t e s - t Ÿ l e t kedvezﾒen fogadott volna bèrmilyen olyan projektet, amely egy egyïrtelm｀en rendﾒri nyomozèsi ïs b ｀ n Ÿ l d û z ï s i hatèskûrbe tartozù kïrdïskûrben « g y e l m e n k ó v Ÿ l h a g y j a a n e m k o r m è n y z a t i szervezetek fellïpïseinek korlètait.
The call for a Community-wide child helpline was also from the political wish-list rather than from «eldexperience.Therehadbeenanumberofsuccessfulnationalchildren'shelplinessetup in Europe (in the UK, for example, and in Italy) in the 1990s, and it is understandable that the Commission might have wished to explore the possibility of extending this experience across the Community.
A kûzûssïgi szint｀ gyermeksegïlyvonallal kapcsolatos felhóvès is inkèbb politikai ûsztûnzïs｀ volt, semmint a helyszóni tapasztalatokbùl szèrmazù. Az 1990-es ïvekben szèmos, azùta sike-resen m｀kûdﾒ nemzeti gyermeksegïlyvonalat hoztak lïtre Eurùpèban (pïldèul az E g y e s Ÿ l t Kirèlysègban ïs Olaszorszègban), ezïrt ïrthetﾒ, hogy a Bizottsèg szeretnï megvizsgèlni, mik a lehetﾒsïgei annak, hogy e tapasztalatot az egïsz Kûzûssïgre kiterjessze.
In practice, however, a number of exploratory e . o r t s bo t h i n D a p h n e - f u n d e d projects, and through a working conference supported by EU-wide research and con-vened by the Commission itself in 1998, showed that varied and deeply established technical, u s e r - p r o « l e a n d l o g i s t i c a l i s s u e s i n t h e Mffe m b e r S t a t e s m a d e a s i n g l e Cffo m mstu n i tffy - w i d e h e l - p l i n e service impossible to achieve (at least given realities then current in telephone technol-ogy, structures and use).
A gyakorlatban azonban a Daphne èltal «nanszórozottprojektekkeretïbenkifejtettszèmosfeltèrùerﾒfeszótïsïs az Uniù-szerte folytatott kutatèssal tèmogatott ïs a Bizottsèg èltal 1998-ben ûsszehóvott
The selection criteria for projects were much more grounded in reality, deriving from a judi-cious coming-together of the modalities outlined in the Stockholm Declaration and Agenda for Action and the Commission's encouragement of European added value.
A Stockholmi Nyilatkozatban ïs Akciùtervben vèzolt mùdozatok ïs a Bizottsèg eurùpai hoz-zèadott ïrtïkre irènyulù ûsztûnzïse kûzûtti szerencsïs talèlkozès folytèn a projektek kivèlasz-tèsènak szempontjai sokkal erﾒsebben gyûkereztek a valùsègban.
Proposals were to meet the following criteria:
Ógy a javaslatoknak a kû-vetkezﾒ szempontoknak kellett m e g f e l e l n i Ÿ k :
‡ ability to present added value at European Union level ̌ projects focusing not only on the immediate (local, regional or national) situation but seeking to contribute to development at a European level;
‡ hozzèadott ïrtïk biztosótèsa az Eurùpai Uniù szintjïn: azaz olyan projektek, amelyek nemcsak a kûzvetlen (helyi, regionèlis vagy nemzeti) helyzetet cïlozzèk meg, hanem kere-sik annak a mùdjèt, hogy hogyan tudnènak hozzèjèrulni az eurùpai szint｀ fejlﾒdïshez;
‡ innovation in terms of content and organisation;
‡ innovèciù a tartalom ïs szervezet tekintetïben;
‡ aims to promote best practice in the area(s) concerned;
‡ a projekt segótse elﾒ, hogy az ïrintett t e r Ÿ l e t e ( k e ) n a lehetﾒ legeredmïnyesebben lehessen alkalmazni a gyakorlatban;
‡ ability to permit transnational exchanges;
‡ a projekt segótse elﾒ az orszègok kûzûtti informèciù- ïs vïlemïnycserït;
‡ a target of transferable results, containing result indicators related to the objectives, with detailed provisions for monitoring against these indicators.
‡ a projekt cïlja legyen az eredmïnyek ètadhatùsèga, melyek tartalmazzèk a cïlokkal û s s z ef Ÿ g g ﾒ eredmïnymutatùkat ïs a rïszletes intïzkedïseket a mutatùktùl valù eltïrïsek felfe-dïsïre.
The Commission believed that the thematic and programmatic aims outlined in the call for proposals were most likely to be achieved through projects that included the following ac-tivities:
A Bizottsèg èllèspontja szerint az ajènlatkïrïsben felvèzolt tematikus ïs a programozèssal kapcsolatos cïlok leginkèbb olyan projektek keretïben valùsóthatùk meg, amelyek magukban foglaljèk a kûvetkezﾒ tevïkenysïgeket:
‡ training and exchanges, primarily for personnel of NGOs and private associations;
‡ tovèbbkïpzïs ïs szakmai cserïk, elsﾒsorban a nem kormènyzati szervezetek ïs m a g è n - e g y e s Ÿ l e t e k szakemberei szèmèra;
‡ pilot projects demonstrating clear European interest and value added;
‡ kósïrleti projektek, melyek egyïrtelm｀en eurùpai ïrdeket ïs hozzèadott ïrtïket hordoz-nak;
‡ the setting-up or reinforcement of European networks, particularly for the promotion and coordination of information and focused on protection and prevention;
‡ eurùpai hèlùzatok lïtrehozèsa ïs megerﾒsótïse, a vïdelemre ïs megelﾒzïsre ûsszpontosó-tù tèjïkoztatès elﾒsegótïsïnek ïs ûsszehangolèsènak cïljèbùl;
‡ studies and research;
‡ tanulmènyok ïs kutatès;
‡ dissemination of information including through campaigns, brochures, newsletters, media presentations, etc. to raise awareness of the problems and to encourage non-violence;
‡ informèciùk terjesztïse tûbbek kûzt a kampènyok sorèn, ismertetﾒkûn, hórleveleken, mïdiabemutatùkon stb. k e r e s z t Ÿ l azzal a cïllal, hogy azok rèïbresszenek a nehïzsïgekre, ïs hirdessïk az erﾒszakmentessïget;
‡ promotion of cooperation between NGOs and public authorities, including law-enforce-ment and judicial bodies.
‡ a nem kormènyzati szervezetek ïs hatùsègok kûzûtti e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d ï s fokozèsa, beleïrtve a b ｀ n Ÿ l d û z ï s i ïs igazsègszolgèltatèsi szerveket.
Although these criteria, aims and priorities presented a formidable challenge to the planning capacity of NGOs, many of whom had worked broadly in child protection but not speci«callyon violence and rarely at pan-European level, the 47 projects selected in 1997 were well fo-cused and succeeded in `tuning in' to the Commission's multi-faceted guidelines.
Bèr ezek a kritïriumok, cïlok ïs prioritèsok ùrièsi kihóvèst jelentettek a nem kormènyzati szer-vezetek tervezïsi kapacitèsènak › k û z Ÿ l Ÿ k szèmos szervezet szïles kûr｀ tevïkenysïget fejtett ki a gyermekvïdelem, de nem s p e c i « k u s a n a z e r ﾒ s z a k t e r Ÿ l e t ï n , ï s c s a k a l e g r i t k è b b e s e t b e n p è n e u r ù p a i szinten ›, az 1997-ben kivèlasztott 47 projekt cïlkit｀zïsei mind megfelelﾒek vol-tak, ïs sikeresen ¶befogadtèk• a Bizottsèg sokoldalÿ irènyelveit.
Since the Daphne initiative and programme comprise projects submitted rather than projects commissioned, the eventual focus of the projects depends entirely on what the proposing organisations wish to work on (within the general guidelines provided).
Mivel a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs (ïs program) tûbbnyire pèlyèzatokon benyÿjtott, semmint kirendelt projektekbﾒl èllt, a projektek esetleges cïlkeresztjïben az èll, amin a javaslù szerve-zetek dolgozni kóvènnak (a rendelkezïsre bocsètott èltalènos irènyelvek hatèrain b e l Ÿ l ) .
No projects were recommended as a result and the issue disappeared altogether from the Daphne radar screen.
Ennek kûvetkeztïben az 1998. ïvi mèsodik ajènlatkïrïs alkalmèval a vèllalt projektek tevïkenysïgi
Aims and priorities
Cïlok ïs prioritèsok skèlèja mèr ¶hïzagos• volt.
This left the possibilities open for broader exploration of reporting mechanisms beyond telephone helplines (for example drop-in centres, police help-desks, etc.).
Az 1997. ïvi tanulsègok miatt az uniùs segïlyvonal lïtrehozèsèra vonatkozù javaslatot mèr
The unrealistic call for projects `to tackle international paedophile rings' was removed from the priority areas and r e d e « n e d i n m o r e a p p r op r i a t e N G O t e r m s i n t h e l i s t o f ` a r e a s w h i c h h a v e nffo t yet been adequately covered' as:
‡ Olyan eszkûzûk bevezetïse, amelyek cïlja, hogy az ûsszes tagorszègban lïtezﾒ megèlla-podèsok ïrtelmïben ûsztûnûzze a beszèmolùk kïszótïsït a gyermekek, «atalokïsnﾒkelleni erﾒszakrùl ïs a nﾒkkel szembeni szexuèlis kizsèkmènyolès cïljèbùl folytatott keres-kedelemrﾒl.
‡ protecting children from paedophile activity by increasing understanding of the nature of paedophile behaviour, recidivism and the role of paedophile networking and use of pornography, thus becoming a research/understanding action rather than direct `tackling'.
Ezzel lehetﾒvï vèlt, hogy a telefonos segïlyvonalnèl sokkal szïlesebb kûrben m｀kûdﾒ jelen-tïstïtel lehetﾒsïgeit is feltïrkïpezzïk (pl. króziskûzpontok, rendﾒrsïgi segïlyszolgèlat stb.).
In an annex entitled `Summary of the areas of activity covered by the programme in 1997 and of certain areas not yet covered', «rstattemptsweremadetoencourageorganisationstoavoidduplicating actions that had already been taken and to either diversify or develop ways to build on previous experience, ideally by broadening the application of existing experiences, lessons or materials to other Member States. Gaps identi«edwere:
A ¶nemzetkûzi p e d o « l h è l ù z a t o k f e l s z è m o l è s è r a • v offn a t k o z ù v a l ù s z e r ｀ t l e n p r o j e k t f e l h ó v è sffl e - k e r Ÿ l t a prioritèst ïlvezﾒ t e r Ÿ l e t e k listèjèrùl, ïs a nem kormènyzati szervezetek szèmèra elfo-gadhatùbb fogalmak segótsïgïvel ÿ j r a d e « n i è l t è k , m i n t ¶ a m ï g n e m m e g f e l e l ﾒ e n k e z e l t t e r Ÿ - l e t e k listèjèn szereplﾒ kïrdïst•.
‡ the identi«cationofvulnerabilityfactorsandgroupsandthedevelopmentofprotectionmechanisms based on these ̌ again an attempt to prompt understanding as a basis for action;
‡ A pedo«lbeèllótottsèg,avisszaesïs,apedo«lhèlùzatïpótïsszerepïnek,valaminta p o r n o - g r è « a h a s z n è l a t è n a k j o b b m e g ï r t ï s ï n k e r e s z t Ÿ l a g y e r m e k e k v ï d e l m e a p e d o « l t e v ï k e n y - s ï g t ﾒ l , azaz inkèbb kutatèst, a megïrtïst cïlzù akciù, semmint kûzvetlen ¶felszèmolès•.
‡ abuse within the extended family group, within male groupings (e.g. armed forces, closed male society) and the abuse pro«leofsuchgroupingšade-emphasisonsexualexploi-tation and a broadening to wider issues of abuse and gendered violence, re‹ectingemerg-ing trends in international debate on these issues;
Az ¶Ûsszefoglalù az 1997. ïvi program èltal kezelt ïs nïhèny mïg kezelïsre vèrù t e r Ÿ l e t r ﾒ l • cóm｀ mellïklet elﾒszûr tett kósïrletet arra, hogy bètorótsa a szervezeteket a mèr megtett s ógy felesleges pèrhuzamos fellïpïsek e l k e r Ÿ l ï s ï r e , valamint arra, hogy tevïkenysïgi palettèjuk szónesótïsïvel talèljèk meg annak mùdjèt, hogyan lehet a korèbbi tapasztalatokat «gyelembevïve kiszïlesóteni a meglïvﾒ tapasztalatokat a tûbbi tagèllam kûvetkeztetïseinek vagy esz-kûzeinek bﾒvótïsïvel. A kûvetkezﾒ hiènyok mutatkoztak:
‡ the role of teachers, carers, siblings, family, society and other potential protectors and how to maximise their impact to protect women and children from abuse ̌ a concise attempt to «ndwaystomobiliseandempowercivilsocietyprotectionagents;
‡ a sebezhetﾒsïgi tïnyezﾒk ïs a legsebezhetﾒbb csoportok beazonosótèsa ïs ennek alapjèn vïdelmi mechanizmusok kidolgozèsa › ez ÿjfenti kósïrlet arra, hogy a jelensïg megïrtïse legyen a fellïpïs kiindulèsi pontja;
‡ the signs of abuse and how to recognise and report them with a view to intervening during abuse ̌ an important, targeted version of `awareness-raising' which aimed to provide tools so that those who are in a position to protect from abuse can recognise when they should act to stop the abuse and support the victim;
‡ visszaïlïs a tègabb ïrtelemben vett csalèdban, illetve fïr«akûsszezèrtkûzûssïgeiben(pl.a fegyveres erﾒknïl), ïs az ilyen kûzûssïgek hajlama a visszaïlïsre. › Itt a hangsÿly a sze-xuèlis kizsèkmènyolèsrùl a visszaïlïs, bèntalmazès ïs a nemi erﾒszak tègabb fogalomkû-rïre helyezﾒdik, s ez t Ÿ k r û z i az e kïrdïsekkel kapcsolatos nemzetkûzi vitèkban kialakulù trendeket;