natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ the development of Community-wide information sources on the various «eldsofvio-lence;
A mèsodik ÿjótès, azaz az ajènlattïtelek kiterjesztïse a helyi hatùsègokra mint projektvezetﾒk-re, mèr egyenesen kûvetkezett a korèbbiakbùl, s mint ilyen, nem volt ÿj kelet｀, noha a gya-korlatban a helyi hatùsègok kicsit nehïzkesen vèllaltèk a projektvezetﾒi szerepet a partner-szerep helyett.
‡ studies of di.erentaspectsofviolenceandhowtopreventthem;
A harmadik vèltozès, azaz a tûbbïves projektek bevonèsa, viszont mèr ïrzïkenyen ïrintette a Daphne-kûltsïgvetïst ïs a projektek kivèlogatèsèt.
‡ identi«cationofwaystoimproverecognition,reportingandmanagementoftheconse-quences of violence.
A Daphne program elsﾒ ïvïben a 12 hùnapnèl hosszabb projektek « n a n s z ó r o z è s è h o z s z Ÿ k s ï g e s p ï n z e s z k û z û k e t a z a d o t t ï v k û l t - s ï g v e t ï s ï b ﾒ l kellett kiutalni.
Projects covered domestic violence, sexual violence including incest, gendered violence, vio-lence in schools, psychological violence, the health impacts of violence including female genital mutilation, law enforcement and child pornography online.
Ez komoly mïrtïkben csûkkentette az adott ïvben «nanszórozottprojektek szèmèt, mivel pïldèul egy hèromïves projekt hèrom egyïves projekt «nanszórozè-si lehetﾒsïgeit vonja el.
They are categorised in more detail in the annex.
Ez pedig elkedvetlenótenï a pèlyèzùkat.
Internet and child pornography are also signi«cant,with6 % of the total.'
A pèlyèzatokban kitïrtek a pèlyèzùknak szùlù irènyelvekben f e l t Ÿ n e t e t t valamennyi tevïkenysïgre, ÿgymint:
Commission report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the Daphne programme 2000›03, January 2002
‡ kûzûs keretprogram az erﾒszak ellen;
Submissions continued to fail because they were local and did not attempt to explore the potential of `European-ness'.
‡ a tûbbfïle tópusÿ erﾒszak hatèsènak mïrïse a helyes viszontvèlasz megèllapótèsa ïrdekï-ben;
However, those projects that did make e . o r t s t o ` b e E u r op e a n ' a c h i e v e d some success and, as monitoring visits, «nalreportsandevaluationsdemonstrated,there began to be a growing understanding of the value of truly `European' action. Projects reported that:
‡ az erﾒszak megelﾒzïsït ïs felderótïsït cïlzù intïzkedïsek ïs gyakorlatok feltïrkïpezïse a jûvﾒbeni erﾒszak megakadèlyozèsa ïrdekïben;
‡ they were able to identify not only di.erencesbetweentheproblems,responsesandwaysof working among Member States but also points of convergence, leading to successful sharing of methodologies and tools;
‡ informèciùs kampènyok, melyek cïlja a nagykûzûnsïg, a mïdia ïs/vagy cïlzott szakmai csoportok rèïbresztïse a problïmèra;
`The researchers, coming from di.erentcountriesandwithdi.erentworkhabits,appliedthemethods from their own vantage point, thus the material gathered is relatively ill-assorted.
‡ az erﾒszak k Ÿ l û n f ï l e t e r Ÿ l e t e i r ﾒ l szùlù informèciùs forrèsok kidolgozèsa Kûzûssïg-szerte;
Despite this, these di.erenceswereanalysedateachjointmeetingandputintoperspectivewithwork habits on the one hand and with the context, reception in the «eld,reactionofauthorities,etc. on the other.' [Project 99/025/C]
‡ tanulmènyok az erﾒszak k Ÿ l û n f ï l e megkûzelótïseirﾒl ïs megakadèlyozèsukrùl;
‡ the value of comparative analysis ̌ for example of legal frameworks relating to sexual violence ̌ enhanced understanding and the ability to advocate for review and harmoni-sation;
‡ az erﾒszak kûvetkezmïnyei felismerïsïnek, bejelentïsïnek ïs kezelïsïnek javótèsèt szol-gèlù mùdszerek beazonosótèsa.
‡ the potential for transfer of knowledge and the sharing of information, methodologies and tools was more evident as organisations got to know each other and understood better their speci«csituationsandneeds;
A projektek felûleltïk a csalèdon b e l Ÿ l i erﾒszakot, a szexuèlis erﾒszakot, beleïrtve a vïrfertﾒ-zïst, a nemi erﾒszakot, az iskolai erﾒszakot, a pszicholùgiai erﾒszakot, az erﾒszak egïszsïgre gyakorolt hatèsait, beleïrtve a N p I NEMI SZERVEK MEGCSONKÓTÈSÈT, a b ｀ n Ÿ l d û z ï s t ïs az internetes gyermekpornogrè«èt.(Ezekrïszletesebbfelsorolèsètlèsdamellïkletben).
‡ they were able to transcend language barriers and develop what some projects called `Daphne language', i.e. communication based on common understanding of the issues and responses.
¶A tevïkenysïgi t e r Ÿ l e t e k tekintetïben egyïrtelm｀en a szexuèlis erﾒszak formèi èllnak az elsﾒ helyen (szexuèlis erﾒszak 17%, kereskedelmi cïlÿ szexuèlis kizsèkmènyolès 8%, emberkereske-delem 7%).
`The question of translating or interpreting a concept such as ``vulnerability'' is complex in itself.
(A Bizottsèg jelentïse az Eurùpai Parlamentnek ïs a Tanècsnak a 2000›2003. ïvi Daphne programrùl, 2002. januèr)
We encountered this problem when translating and adapting questionnaires, and it posed a problem even for French-speaking children.
Sok pèlyèzat tovèbbra sem nyert, mert helyi jelleg｀ maradt, ïs meg sem kósïrelte feltèrni az ¶eurùpaisègban• rejlﾒ lehetﾒsïgeket.
„Vulnerability is a concept that is di/culttotrans-late as it relates to di.erentsemantic(andsocial)«elds:justice,education,medicine,criminol-ogy, protection of children, social work, psychology and cultural anthropology„However, within the team, as a result of the seminars, members became familiar with each other and began to understand each other better.'
Sikeresebbek voltak azok a projektek azonban, amelyek mïgis megkósïreltek ¶eurùpai jelleget ûlteni•, ïs amint azt az ellenﾒrzﾒ lètogatèsok, zèrùje-lentïsek ïs ïrtïkelïsek igazoltèk, egyre tûbben ïrtettïk meg az ¶eurùpaisèg• èltal hordozott ïrtïkeket.
Although much remained to be learned about what being a `European project' entailed, there were clear signs by 2000 that many organisations had grown, as a result of Daphne support, into organisations whose impact was European rather than national or even local.
‡ nem csupèn a tagèllamokban lïtezﾒ problïmèk, vèlaszok ïs munkamùdszerek kûzûtti el-tïrïseket tudtèk rûgzóteni, de ezeket egymèshoz is tudtèk kûzelóteni, s ezzel sikeresen meg tudtèk osztani egymèssal a mùdszertanokat ïs az eszkûzûket;
There remained a concern, however, that the Daphne programme should not be just a short-term funding mechanism but a framework in which learning ̌ about violence and how to respond to it in terms of protection, prevention and support for victims ̌ might develop and build into a comprehensive response to this EU-wide problem.
Ennek ellenïre ezek az eltïrïsek minden kûzûs ïrtekezleten terótïkre s ûsszevetïsre k e r Ÿ l t e k , egyrïszt a munkabïli szokèsokban valù k Ÿ l û n b s ï g e k , mèsrïszt a kontextus, a fogad-tatès, a hatùsègok reakciùi stb. tekintetïben.• [99/025/C projekt]
The key words for the remaining years of the Daphne programme, therefore, became `devel-opment', `building', `adapting' and `extending'.
‡ pïldèul a szexuèlis erﾒszakra vonatkozù jogi keretek ûsszehasonlótù elemzïse nagyban hozzèjèrult a problïmakûr jobb megïrtïsïhez ïs a jogi keretek f e l Ÿ l v i z s g è l a t è h o z ïs har-monizèciùjèhoz;
The selection panel focused on projects that aimed to add value to work that had already been done, by:
‡ a tudès ètadèsènak, az informèciù, mùdszertanok ïs eszkûzûk megosztèsènak lehetﾒsïge sokkal egyïrtelm｀bbï vèlt, hiszen a szervezetek megismertïk egymèst, ïs mïg jobban ètïreztïk sajètos h e l y z e t Ÿ k e t ïs s z Ÿ k s ï g l e t e i k e t ;
‡ evaluating and testing output and results, adapting them and taking them further;
‡ a rïsztvevﾒk f e l Ÿ l tudtak emelkedni nyelvi korlètaikon, ïs ki tudtèk alakótani az egyes pro-jektek èltal csak ¶Daphne-nyelvkïnt• emlegetett nyelvet, azaz a kïrdïsek ïs vèlaszok e g y Ÿ t - t e s megïrtïsïn alapulù kommunikèciùt.
‡ updating research and broadening it to cover all Member States and, where possible, can-didate countries and EFTA/EEA countries (plus Cyprus, Malta and Turkey);
¶Egy olyan fogalom fordótèsa vagy tolmècsolèsa, mint a ‚sebezhetﾒsïg§, mèr ûnmagèban is bo-nyolult feladat.
‡ moving from studies and data collection to analysis and, on the basis of this, recommenda-tions and lessons at European level;
Bèr mïg rengeteg a tanulnivalù az ¶eurùpai projektekrﾒl• ïs azok apportjèrùl, 2000-re mèr sok szervezet a Daphne-tèmogatèsnak kûszûnhetﾒen vèlt inkèbb eurùpai, mint nemzeti vagy akèr helyi hatèskûrrel rendelkezﾒ szervezettï.
‡ broader application of training and education modules, awareness-raising materials, and operational tools such as questionnaires;
Egy fontos kïrdïs azonban megoldatlan maradt: a Daphne program ne csak egy rûvid tèvra «nanszórozùmechanizmuslegyen,hanemegyolyankeret,amelybenazerﾒszakrùl,azarravalù reagèlèsrùl, a vïdelmezïsrﾒl, a megelﾒzïsrﾒl ïs az èldozatok segótïsïrﾒl valù tanulès tovèbb fejlﾒdhet, ïs b e ï p Ÿ l h e t egy erre az egïsz Eurùpèt ïrintﾒ problïmèra adott ètfogù vèlaszba.
‡ compilation and documentation of resources made available by Daphne and other sources (web-based, human, publications, audiovisual, training methodologies and packages, etc.).
A Daphne programbùl mïg hètralevﾒ ïvek kulcsszavai ezïrt a ¶fejlesztïs•, ¶ïpótïs•, ¶adaptèlès• ïs ¶kiterjesztïs• lettek.
If this were to be possible, it would also be necessary to reinforce partnerships, expand net-works and improve capacity, including through the continued exchange of information and perhaps s t a . , m o r e r e g u l a r « e l d v i s i t s i nffo t h e r Mffe m b e r S t a t e s , a n d mstu c h i m p r o v e d , m o r e t a r g e t e d conferences, workshops and other working meetings.
‡ a teljesótmïny ïs az eredmïnyek ïrtïkelïse ïs tesztelïse, ezek alkalmazèsa ïs tovèbbvi-tele;
Achieving this within the limits of project funding became a real challenge and, as the Daphne programme progressed and submissions did rise to the challenge posed by the Commission's encouragement to improve, budgets became severely squeezed and the possibility of failure or incomplete activity became a reality for some organisations.
‡ a kutatès aktualizèlèsa ïs kiszïlesótïse az ûsszes tagèllamra, ïs ahol ez lehetsïges, a tagje-lûlt ïs az EFTA/EGT-orszègokra (valamint Ciprusra, Mèltèra, Tûrûkorszègra);
Aims and priorities produce all its publications in English only, rather than favour one of the partners' lan-guages!).
‡ tanulmènyok kïszótïse ïs adatgy｀jtïs helyett az elemzïsek elﾒtïrbe helyezïse, ïs ennek alapjèn eurùpai szint｀ javaslatok ïs kûvetkeztetïsek;
Given its time-bound nature, the Daphne programme 2000›03 also focused increasingly on the ability of projects to sustain their impact and on what the Commission itself could do to facilitate this:
‡ a kïpzïsi ïs oktatèsi modulok ïs a rèïbresztïs eszkûzeinek (kïrdﾒóvek) szïlesebb kûr｀ al-kalmazèsa;
‡ the Daphne website was upgraded so that there would be a long-term archive of all project reports;
‡ a Daphne ïs egyïb forrèsok (internet, humèn, kiadvènyok, audiovizuèlis, kïpzïsi mùdszer-tanok ïs csomagok stb.) èltal rendelkezïsre bocsètott anyagok szerkesztïse ïs dokumen-tèlèsa.
‡ a `library' of awareness-raising materials that had been produced in projects was begun in 2002 and produced both as a printed resource and in electronic form posted to the website.
Ideèlis esetben s z Ÿ k s ï g lenne a partnersïgek megerﾒsótïsïre, a hèlùzatok bﾒvótïsïre ïs a kapacitèsok fokozèsèra tûbbek kûzûtt tovèbbi informèciùcserïvel ïs az èllomèny esetleges lecserïlïsïvel, rendszeresebb helyszóni lètogatèsokkal mès tagèllamokban ïs sokkal maga-sabb szint｀ ïs jobban cïlzott konferencièkkal, m｀helyekkel ïs mès munkaïrtekezletekkel.
This allowed organisations to download graphics «lesforposters,forexample,sothatananti-violence message developed and tested in one project could be replicated across other Member States with minimum expense and maximum consistency;
S z Ÿ k s ï g lenne pl. olyan ÿj projektek pèlyèztatèsèra is, melyek ïrtïkelïsi mutatùkat dolgoznak ki, szorgalmazzèk a bevèlt gyakorlat kielemzïsït, ïs tûkïletesótik az adatgy｀jtïst ïs a feltïr-kïpezïst, s ezzel egy ètfogù kïpet adnènak az Eurùpèban megnyilvènulù erﾒszak minden formèjèrùl.
‡ a series of `illustrative cases' was produced to give examples of the kinds of projects that Daphne had funded and to show how they had succeeded and what their impact had been;
Ez azonban igazi kihóvèst jelent a p r o j e k t « n a n s z ó r o z è s k e r e t e i k û z û t t ï s a D a p h n e p r o g r a m e l ﾒ r e h a l a d t è v a l , ïs ahogy egyre tûbb pèlyèzat ïrkezett a Bizottsèg felhóvèsa nyomèn, a kûlt-sïgvetïsek kiapadtak, ïs nem egy szervezetet fenyegetett az a veszïly, hogy pèlyèzata nem lesz sikeres, vagy nem tudja vïgigvinni azt.
‡ the idea of Daphne News was reprised through regular e-mail communications to all or-ganisations who had worked with Daphne, containing information on newly funded projects, updates to the website, and other milestones.
Mivel a Daphne program 2000›2003 sz｀k idﾒkorlètokon b e l Ÿ l m｀kûdik, egyre inkèbb fontos szempont lett az, hogy a projektek maradandù hatèst gyakoroljanak, ïs az, hogy mit tesz a Bizottsèg ennek elﾒmozdótèsa ïrdekïben.
Projects had always had to identify a minimum of 20 % co-«nancingfortheirprojects,andincreasingly monitoring visits were used to encourage them to seek ongoing funding so that their Daphne-funded activity could continue without Commission support.
‡ a Daphne weboldalèt felÿjótottèk, ïs ógy lehetﾒvï vèlt a projektjelentïsek hosszÿ tèvÿ tè-rolèsa;
Where possible, ideas were shared on where funding might be sourced; nevertheless, ongoing funding re-mained a challenge.
‡ a ¶rèïbresztïs• eszkûzeinek projektekben kïszótett ¶katalùgusèt• 2002-ben kezdtïk lïtre-hozni.
At the Commission itself, consideration was given as early as 2002 to the future of the Daphne programme and its possible renewal.
Ebbﾒl lehetett kinyomtatni, móg az elektronikus formèban lïvﾒ anyagok f e l k e r Ÿ l t e k a weboldalra.
Lessons from the seven-year Daphne experience were built into preliminary proposals, including the need for increased funding to allow bigger projects to be supported, and some means of allowing the Commission to actively commis-sion projects to « l l g a ps i d e n t i « e d a s i m po r t a n t t o t h e Cffo m mstu n i tffy bu t nffo tp r o po s e d b y o r - g a n i s a t i o n s .
Ezèltal lehetﾒvï vèlt, hogy a szervezetek pïldèul gra«kusfèjlokatposztergyanènt tûltsenek le, ógy az egyik projektben kidolgozott ïs letesztelt erﾒszakellenes Ÿze-net minimèlis rèfordótèssal ïs maximèlis ûsszhanggal sokszorosóthatù ïs a tûbbi tagèllam-ban terjeszthetﾒ lett;
`The Daphne programme is acknowledged as an important multidisciplinary instrument in the campaign against violence and it has acquired international renown.'
‡ e l k ï s z Ÿ l t a ¶szemlïltetﾒ esetek• sorozata, mellyel illusztrèlni ïs bemutatni lehetett a Daphne èltal «nanszórozottprojekteket,asikerhezvezetﾒutatïshatèsukat;
Resolution of the European Parliament on the mid-term review of the Daphne programme 2000›03
A z e g y r e g y a - k o r i b b ellenﾒrzﾒ lètogatèsok cïlja ezïrt az volt, hogy ezzel is ûsztûnûzzïk a szervezeteket a « n a n s z ó r o z è s i f o r r è s o k f o l y a m a t o s k e r e s ï s ï r e , ï s h o g y a D a p h n e è l t a l « n a n s z ó r o z o t t m u n k a a
Exploring violence
Cïlok ïs prioritèsok
Seven years of action, 303 projects funded, hundreds of organisations working and thousands of people touched by this work, and still Daphne has never de«ned`violence'.
Ha lehetsïges volt, a szervezetek ki-cserïltïk egymès kûzt az esetleges tèmogatùk elïrhetﾒsïgeit, azonban a folyamatos «nan-szórozès tovèbbra is kihóvès maradt.
Instead, the Daphne initia-tive and programme sought to explore violence as understood by the people of Europe them-selves ̌ leaders, partners, participants and b e n e « c i a r i e s o f D a p h n e - f u n d e d a c t i o n s ̌ a n d t hffu s to map out the whole gamut of actions, structures, frameworks and attitudes that are `violence' in Europe.
Ezek kûzûtt szerepel a megemelt p ï n z Ÿ g y i tèmogatès s z Ÿ k s ï g e s s ï g e a nagyobb projektek tèmo-gatèsa ïrdekïben, illetve azon eszkûzûk, amelyekkel a Bizottsèg olyan projekteket rendelhet meg, amelyek betûlthetik az èltala fontosnak tartott, de a szervezetek èltal nem javasolt ¶hï-zagokat•.
There is consequently no de«nitionofviolenceincludedinthedecision (10) establishing the Daphne programme 2000›03.
¶A nemzetkûzi hórnev｀ Daphne program egy elismert, fontos multidiszciplinèris eszkûz az erﾒ-szak elleni kampènyban.•
There is, however, a general statement indicating some of the implications of violence and relating it in particular to negative impact on health, since the legal base for the programme was within the ambit of public health.
(Jelentïs az Eurùpai Parlamentnek a 2000›2003. ïvi Daphne program kûzïptèvÿ èttekintïsïrﾒl, amelyet a Bizottsèg a Nﾒk Jogaiïrt ïs az Esïlyegyenlﾒsïgïrt kïszótett)
`Physical, sexual and psychological violence against children, young persons and women consti-tutes a breach of their right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity and a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence; the e.ectsof such violence are so widespread throughout the Community as to constitute a major health scourge.
Ehelyett tehèt a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs ïs program azt kósïrelte meg feltèrni, amit maguk az eurùpai emberek › a Daphne èltal tèmogatott akciùk vezetﾒi, partnerei, rïsztvevﾒi ïs kedvezmïnyezettjei › ïrtenek az erﾒszakon, majd ennek nyomèn megrajzolta az Eurùpèban ¶erﾒszaknak• tekintett fellïpïsek, struktÿrèk, keretek ïs attit｀dûk teljes palettèjèt.
It is important to recognise the serious immediate and long-term implications for health, psycho-logical and social development, and for the equal opportunities of those concerned, that violence has for individuals, families and communities and the high social and economic costs to society as a whole.
¶A gyermekek, «atalokïsnﾒkelleni«zikai,szexuèlisïspszicholùgiaierﾒszaksïrtijogukatazïlethez, biztonsèghoz, szabadsèghoz, mïltùsèghoz, «zikaiïsïrzelmiintegritèsukhoz,ïssÿ-lyosan veszïlyezteti az ilyen erﾒszak èldozatèul esett szemïlyek «zikaiïsmentèlisegïszsïgït.Az ilyen erﾒszak kûvetkezmïnyeinek szïles kûrben valù elterjedïse a Kûzûssïgben sÿlyos csapèst jelent az egïszsïgre.
According to the World Health Organisation's de«nition,healthisastateofcompletephysical,mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or in«rmity.'
Fontos, hogy f e l i s m e r j Ÿ k , milyen sÿlyos kûzvetlen ïs hosszÿ tèvÿ kûvetkezmïnyekkel jèr az erﾒszak az èldozatok egïszsïgïre, pszicholùgiai ïs szocièlis fejlﾒdïsïre ïs esïlyegyenlﾒsïgï-re, ïs hogy az erﾒszak az egyïnek, csalèdok ïs kûzûssïgek szèmèra magas tèrsadalmi, szoci-èlis ïs gazdasègi kûltsïgekkel jèr.
In short, violence was seen as anything that impeded `complete physical, mental and social well-being' and a breach of the right to `life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emo-tional integrity'.
Ûsszefoglalva, az erﾒszak megótïlïse az volt, hogy gètolja a ¶teljes «zikai,mentèlisïsszocièlisjùlïtet•, ïs megsïrti az ¶ïlethez, biztonsèghoz, szabadsèghoz, mïltùsèghoz, «zikaiïsïrzelmiintegritèshoz• valù jogot.
This very broad approach to violence allowed Daphne projects to explore in detail the many faces of violence and the speci«cnational,regionalandlocalformsitpre-dominantly takes.
Az erﾒszak e r e n d k ó v Ÿ l tèg ïrtelm｀ megkûzelótïsïnek kûszûnhetﾒ-en a Daphne-projektek mïlyrehatùan feltèrtèk az erﾒszak ezer ïs ezer arcèt, ïs azokat a sajè-tos nemzeti, regionèlis ïs helyi formèit, amelyeket tûbbnyire magèra ûlt.
) Decision No 293/2000/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 January 2000 adopting a programme of Community action (the Daphne programme) (2000 to 2003) on preventive measures to #ghtviolence against children, young persons and women.
Az Európai Parlament ês a Tanâcs 2000. januâr 24-i 293/2000/EK hatârozata, amely kõzõssêgi fellêpêst fogad el (a 2000«2003. êvi Daphne program) megel┸z┸ intêzkedêsekr┸l a gyermekek, #atalokêsn┸k elleni er┸szak leküzdêse cêljâból.
This broad contextual statement has served to allow considerable ‹exibilityinapproachestoviolence taken by projects throughout the life of the Daphne programme.
Ez az erﾒszak fogalmènak ily szïles ïrtelmezïst adù nyilatkozat lehetﾒvï tette, hogy a Daphne program egïsz idﾒtartama alatt rugalmasan kezelje a projektek tïmèjèul szolgèlù erﾒszakot.
Since 2000, projects have focused on areas of violence that are prevalent across the Member States of the EU (and often beyond) and therefore provide opportunities for transferring results, but that are also identi«edasbeingpriorityareasforactionintheprojectorganisations'ownlocalities/coun-tries.
2000 ùta a projektek az erﾒszak olyan t e r Ÿ l e t e i t ïrintettïk, amelyek az EU tagèllamaiban (ïs gyakran azon tÿl) hangsÿlyozottan jelen vannak. Ennek kûszûnhetﾒen lehetﾒvï vèlt az ered-mïnyek ètadèsa, ïs ezek a t e r Ÿ l e t e k egyszersmind olyan prioritèst ïlvezﾒ t e r Ÿ l e t e k k ï is vèltak, amelyek hathatùs fellïpïst igïnyelnek a szervezetek sajèt orszègaiban.
This may well explain the continued support for Daphne from organisations working at community level and represents a signi«cantstepinbuildingabridgebetweencommunity-level priorities and issues of European importance.
Ez nem csupèn azt magyarèzza, hogy miïrt tèmogatjèk kûzûssïgi szint｀ szervezetek a Daphne programot, ha-nem fontos elﾒrelïpïs abban is, hogy hód ï p Ÿ lj û n a kûzûssïgi szint｀ prioritèsok ïs eurùpai jelentﾒsïg｀ tïmèk kûzûtt.
The diversity of violence in Europe
Az ezerarcÿ erﾒszak Eurùpèban
Over the life of the Daphne programme, therefore, projects have been supported that have worked to protect from, and to prevent, these general areas of violence:
A Daphne program idﾒtartama alatt ezïrt olyan programokat tèmogatott, melyek cïlja az erﾒ-szak alèbbi, legèltalènosabb megnyilvènulèsai elleni vïdekezïs ïs azok megakadèlyozèsa:
‡ emotional and verbal abuse,
‡ emocionèlis ïs verbèlis bèntalmazès
‡ coercion and exploitation,
‡ kïnyszerótïs ïs kizsèkmènyolès
‡ psychological violence,
‡ pszicholùgiai erﾒszak
A more detailed list of the forms of violence i d e n t i « e d i n E u r op e , a n d t h e g r o up s m o b i l i s e d t h r o u g h Daphne projects to combat them, can be found in Annex 1.
Az erﾒszak Eurùpèban beazonosótott formèit ïs a Daphne-projekteken k e r e s z t Ÿ l ezek l e k Ÿ z - d ï s ï r e mobilizèlt csoportok rïszletesebb listèjèt lèsd az 1. mellïkletben.
Although it soon became clear that the multi-faceted nature of violence was well re‹ectedinprojects submitted to and/or funded by Daphne, it was also obvious that conducting a Euro-barometer exercise to seek more input on Europeans' perceptions of violence would not only complement project activity but also serve as a base for attempting to track some trends in perceptions of violence over time.
Bèr hamar vilègossè vèlt, hogy az erﾒszak ezerarcÿ jellegït jùl t Ÿ k r û z t ï k a Daphnïhoz benyÿj-tott ïs/vagy a Daphne èltal «nanszórozottpèlyèzatok,azisnyilvènvalùvolt,hogyhaegyÿn.Eurobaromïter-felmïrïs segótsïgïvel vizsgèlatot vïgeznïnek az eurùpaiak erﾒszakfelfogè-sèrùl, akkor ezzel nemcsak k i e g ï s z Ÿ l n ï n e k a projektek tevïkenysïgei, hanem ez alapjèn nyo-mon kûvethetﾒ lenne az erﾒszak-percepciù nïhèny trendje is.
The disaggregated nature of the data in Eurobarometer studies also allows for some general conclusions to be drawn about how di.erentcountries,age groups and socioeconomic groups might also perceive violence, and their responses to it.
Az ezernyi ¶adatmorzsènak• kûszûnhetﾒen az Eurobaromïter-tanulmènyokbùl nïhèny èltalènos tanulsèg is levonhatù az-zal kapcsolatban, hogy a k Ÿ l û n f ï l e orszègok, kor- ïs tèrsadalmi-gazdasègi csoportok hogyan lètjèk az erﾒszakot, ïs hogyan reagèlnak rè.