natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(h) A vast majority of the partners have a long experience of violence prevention or protection „
A Daphne-tapasztalat eredmïnyei h) A partnerek tÿlnyomù tûbbsïge sokïves tapasztalattal rendelkezik az erﾒszak megelﾒzï-sïnek ïs az erﾒszak elleni vïdekezïsnek a t e r Ÿ l e t ï n „
(N = 216 projects with experience)
(N= 216 projekt tapasztalattal)
„ and that experience is used in the projects: there is a great correspondence between their area of expertise and the area tackled by the project, as can be seen from the follow-ing diagram:
„ïs ezt a tapasztalatot fel is hasznèlja a projektben: erﾒs kapcsolat van a szakïrtelem t e r Ÿ - l e t e ïs a projekt èltal megcïlzott t e r Ÿ l e t kûzûtt, mint az az alèbbi diagramrùl leolvashatù:
7 % i Areas of the project are in the `core activities' of the coordinator
7 % i A projekt t e r Ÿ l e t e i a koordinètor ¶fﾒ tevïkenysïgei• kûrïbe esnek i"A projekt egyik t e r Ÿ l e t e a koordinètor ¶fﾒ tevïkenysïgei• kûrïbe esik
(i) A link with past projects and synergies with running projects were developed: as sug-gested in the priorities of the calls for proposals, a number of projects have built upon the experience of others or have developed synergies with other running projects as follows:
5 4 % i"A projekt t e r Ÿ l e t e i a koordinètor ¶fﾒ tevïkenysïgei• kûrïn k ó v Ÿ l esnek i) Kapcsolat rïgebbi projektekkel ïs e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d ï s kifejlesztïse mès futù projektekkel: amint a pèlyèzati felhóvès prioritèsai sugalljèk, szèmos projekt ïpótett mèsok tapasztalata-ira, vagy fejlesztett ki e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d ï s t mès zajlù projektekkel. Rïszletesen:
104 (50 %) of projects have a link with a previous project:
104 (50%) projekt kapcsolùdik valamely korèbbi projekthez:
‡ for 80 of these, this was with a Daphne project.
‒ 80 esetïben ez egy Daphne-projekt.
One of them also has a link with a local project and one with a project funded by the Education and Culture Directorate- General;
Ezek k û z Ÿ l egy lokèlis projekthez is kapcsolùdik, egy mèsik pedig egy, az O k t a t è s Ÿ g y i ïs Kulturèlis Fﾒigazgatùsèg èltal tèmogatott pro-jekthez;
‡ nine projects were funded by local/regional/national authorities/organisations;
‒ 9 projektet tèmogattak helyi/regionèlis/nemzeti hatùsègok/szervezetek;
‡ two projects were funded by the EQUAL programme (`Poverty eradication and social exclusion' and `NOW initiative');
‒ 2 projektet az EQUAL program tèmogatott (¶A szegïnysïg felszèmolèsa ïs a tèrsadalmi kirekesztïs• ïs a ¶NOW kezdemïnyezïs•);
‡ eight projects were funded by other EC programmes (`Injury protection' from the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, `Jeunesse pour l'Europe', Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Directorate-General, Employment and Social A . a i r s D i r e c t o r a t e - G e n e r a l , ` E u r op e a g a i n s t A I D S ' , E d u c a t i o n a n d C u l tffu r e D i r e c t o r a t e - G e n - e r a l , Internal Market Directorate General, `Leonardo da Vinci') (one project each);
‒ 8 projektet mès EK-programok tèmogattak (¶Vïdelem a s ï r Ÿ l ï s e k k e l szemben, E g ï s z - s ï g Ÿ g y i ïs Fogyasztùvïdelmi Fﾒigazgatùsèg•, ¶ I － ÿ s è g E u r ù p è ï r t • , ¶ I n f o r m è c i ù s , K o m - m u n i k è c i ù s , Kulturèlis ïs Audiovizuèlis Fﾒigazgatùsèg•, ¶Foglalkoztatèsi ïs Szocièlis Fﾒ-igazgatùsèg•, ¶Eurùpa az AIDS ellen•, ¶ O k t a t è s Ÿ g y i ïs Kulturèlis Fﾒigazgatùsèg•, ¶Belsﾒ Piaci Fﾒigazgatùsèg•, ¶Leonardo•) (1-1 projekt);
Type of link with previous project
Az elﾒzﾒ projekttel valù kapcsolat tópusa
Previous project gave the idea of the project
Az elﾒzﾒ projekt adta a jelen projekt ûtletït
Project uses results of previous project
A projekt megerﾒsóti/kiterjeszti az elﾒzﾒ projekt eredmïnyeit
Project disseminates results of previous project
A projekt elterjeszti az elﾒzﾒ projekt eredmïnyeit
Project replicates results to other areas of violence
A projekt az erﾒszak mès t e r Ÿ l e t e i n ismïtli meg az elïrt eredmïnyeket
Project replicates results to another location
A projekt mès helyen ismïtli meg az elïrt eredmïnyeket
Projects developing synergies with other running projects
Mès zajlù projektekkel e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d ï s t kifejlesztﾒ projektek
Sixty-one projects (29 %) have synergies with another running project:
61 projekt (29%) m｀kûdik e g y Ÿ t t mès zajlù projektekkel:
‡ seven projects were Daphne projects, including one that also developed synergies with national projects;
‒ 7 projekt Daphne-projekt volt, melyek k û z Ÿ l 1 nemzeti projektekkel is e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d û t t ;
‡ 29 projects were funded by local/regional/national authorities/organisations;
‒ 29 projektet tèmogattak helyi/regionèlis/nemzeti hatùsègok/szervezetek;
‡ four projects were funded by the EQUAL programme (respectively by the `NOW' and `Em-ployment' initiatives (one project each) as well as `Social exclusion' (two projects));
‒ 4 projektet az EQUAL program tèmogatott (konkrïtan: NOW [1 projekt], a M u n k a Ÿ g y i kez-demïnyezïs [1 projekt], illetve a Tèrsadalmi kirekesztïs [2 projekt]);
‡ two projects were funded by Employment and Social A . a i r s D i r e c t o r a t e - G e n e r a l ;
‒ 2 projektet tèmogatott a Foglalkoztatèsi ïs Szocièlis Fﾒigazgatùsèg;
‡ two projects were funded by `Europe against AIDS', including one that also developed synergies with national projects;
‒ 2 projektet tèmogatott az EURÙPA az AIDS ellen, melyek k û z Ÿ l 1 nemzeti projektekkel is e g y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d û t t ;
‡ two projects were funded by the `Leonardo da Vinci' programme;
‒ 2 projektet a Leonardo da Vinci-program tèmogatott;
‡ three projects were funded by other EC programmes (RURIS, Prisma, STOP) (one project each);
‒ 3 projektet mès EK-programok tèmogattak (RURIS, PRISMA, STOP) (1-1 projekt);
‡ three projects of networks of associations;‡ one project was funded by the Catholic Overseas Development Fund;‡ one project had contacts with the European Observatory on Violence.
‒ 1 projekt az Eurùpai Erﾒszak-meg«gyelﾒÈllomèssal volt szerzﾒdïses viszonyban.
Type of links with the other running project
A mès zajlù projekttel valù kapcsolat tópusa
Project uses the results of other project
A projekt felhasznèlja a mèsik projekt eredmïnyeit
Project disseminates results of other project
A projekt elterjeszti a mèsik projekt eredmïnyeit
Project replicates results to other areas of violence
A projekt mès cïlcsoportokkal/kedvezmïnyezettekkel ismïtli meg az elïrt eredmïnyeket
Exchange of information/experience between both projects
Informèciù-/tapasztalatcsere a kït projekt kûzûtt
(j) The groups targeted by the projects are wide-ranging:
(N= 218 projekt, projektenkïnt legfeljebb hèrom tïtel)
(k) If we consider the Daphne objectives (as de«nedinthedecisionandrecalledinthetextsof the calls for proposals), the following split and evolution were detected:
A brief history of Daphne k) A Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek szempontjèbùl (amelyeket a hatèrozat jelûl ki, ïs amelyek a pè-lyèzati felhóvèsok szûvegïben is szerepelnek) a kûvetkezﾒ megoszlès ïs fejlﾒdïs tapasz-talhatù:
Support to multidisciplinary networks
Multidiszciplinèris hèlùzatok tèmogatèsa
Exchange of good practices
A bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïse
Studies, research or data collection
Tanulmènyok, kutatès vagy adatgy｀jtïs
Information sources
Tèjïkoztatù forrèsok
Recognition and reporting of violence
Az erﾒszak felismerïse ïs jelentïse
Daphne objectives of the projects: i1997›99 , i65 projects 2000›01 andi70 projects 2002›03
A projektek Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsei i1997›99 , i65 projekt 2000›2001 ïs i70 projekt 2002›2003
The objective of 65 % (on average) of the projects is the exchange of good practices and this is increasingly so when looking at the evolution of the projects' generations.
A projektek 65%-ènak (ètlagosan) cïlkit｀zïse a bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïse. Mïg szem-bet｀nﾒbb ez a tÿlsÿly, ha m e g n ï z z Ÿ k a projektgenerèciùk fejlﾒdïsït.
This illustrates the true added value of Daphne, i.e. the transfer of good practices within and between transnational partnerships.
Ez jùl mutatja a Daphne valùdi hozzèadott ïrtïkït: a bevèlt gyakorlatok tovèbbadèsèt a nemzetkûzi part-neri t û m û r Ÿ l ï s e k e n b e l Ÿ l ïs kûzûtt.
On the contrary, the building of information sources is still not greatly tackled.
Ezzel szemben az informèciùs forrèsok lïtrehozèsa mïg jobbèra a jûvﾒ feladata.
An interesting evolution that emerges from the diagram is the decrease of the `informa-tion campaigns' and of the `recognition and reporting of violence' categories, in favour of more `studies, research or data collection' and `exchange of good practices'.
Ïrdekes fejlﾒdïs olvashatù le az èbrèrùl: a tèjïkoztatèsi kampènyok ïs az erﾒszak felismerïse ïs jelentïse kategùrièban, melyet a tanulmènyok ïs a bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïsïnek nû-vekedïse ellensÿlyoz.
Obviously, after the «rstfewyearswhentheneedforsuchcampaignswasobvious,theorganisationsinvolved in the «ghtagainstviolencestartedtorelylessonthisapproachandtofocusmore on other objectives.
Az elsﾒ nïhèny ïvben az e.ïlekampènyirèntiigïnymagètùlïrte-tﾒdﾒ volt, ezt kûvetﾒen viszont az erﾒszak elleni k Ÿ z d e l e m b e n rïszt vevﾒ szervezetek egy-re kevïsbï tèmaszkodtak erre a megkûzelótïsre, ïs mès cïlkit｀zïsek kaptak nagyobb «-gyelmet.
When analysing in more detail the nature of the projects' objec-tives, the following categories appear:
A projektek cïlkit｀zïseinek rïszletesebb elemzïse sorèn a kûvetkezﾒ kategùrièk bukkannak fel:
Improved understanding of violence
Az erﾒszak jobb megïrtïse
Prevention of violence
Az erﾒszak megelﾒzïse
Detection of violence
Az erﾒszak leleplezïse
Protection from violence
Vïdelem az erﾒszakkal szemben
Assistance to victims
Segótsïgnyÿjtès az èldozatoknak
Reintegration of victims
Az èldozatok ÿjraintegrèlèsa
Psychological support to victims
Az èldozatok pszicholùgiai tèmogatèsa
Support to families
Tèmogatès a csalèdoknak
Legislative measures
Jogi intïzkedïsek
Treatment of o.enders
Az elkûvetﾒk kezelïse
Reintegration of o.enders
Az elkûvetﾒk ÿjraintegrèlèsa
Results and impact of Daphne
A Daphne eredmïnyei ïs hatèsa
For the purpose of this report, an evaluation of the seven years of Daphne activities (1997›2003) was carried out.
E jelentïs cïljaira ïrtïkelïs k ï s z Ÿ l t a Daphne hïtïves (1997›2003) tevïkenysïgeirﾒl.
The main characteristic of this study is that it is exhaustive: all projects (303) from the initiative (1997›99) and the programme (2000›03) have been analysed.
A tanul-mèny legfontosabb vonèsa a teljessïg: az elemzïs a kezdemïnyezïs (1997›1999) ïs a program (2000›2003) minden projektjïre (303) kiterjed.
The conclusions were as follows:
Az alèbbi kûvetkeztetïseket s i k e r Ÿ l t levonni:
`The initiative and programme objectives were and remain relevant to the needs at their origin i.e. protecting children, young people and women from violence and preventing it.
¶A kezdemïnyezïs ïs a program cïlkit｀zïsei az eredeti igïnyek › azaz a gyermekek, «atalokïs nﾒk erﾒszaktùl valù megvïdïse ïs az erﾒszak megelﾒzïse › szempontjèbùl relevènsak voltak ïs ma-radtak.
Both the outputs and the impacts contribute to achieving each objective of the Daphne programme, so con«rmingits e.ectiveness.Thee/ciencyof theprogrammeis evidencedby theimpressiveoutputsandim-pacts, compared with the modest resources allocated.
A vóvmènyok ïs a hatèsok egyarènt hozzèjèrulnak a Daphne program egyes cïlkit｀zïsei-nek megvalùsótèsèhoz, igazolva annak hatïkonysègèt. A program hatïkonysègèt tanÿsótjèk a rendelkezïsre èllù szerïny forrèsokhoz mïrten ragyogù vóvmènyok ïs hatèsok.
Their sustainability once the projects have ended is rather weak, because of insu/cientlyplannedandtargeteddisseminationanddi/cultieswith post-project funding.'
A projekt befejezï-sït kûvetﾒen ezek fenntarthatùsèga igen gyenge az eredmïnyek nem kielïgótﾒen megtervezett ïs cïlzott terjesztïse, valamint a projekt utù«nanszórozèsènak nehïzsïgei miatt.•
The «ndingscanbesummarisedasfollows:
A kûvetkeztetïsek az alèbbi mùdon foglalhatùk ûssze:
Violence against children,
Erﾒszak a gyermekekkel, «atalokkal
" young people and women
" ïs nﾒkkel szemben
Daphne Initiative and Programme
Daphne kezdemïnyezïs ïs program
E/ciency: excellent value for money
Hatïkonysèg: kivèlù ïrtïk a befektetett pïnzïrt
E.ectiveness: good for both outputs and impacts
Hatèsossèg: mind a vóvmènyok, mind a hatèsok tekintetïben jù
Sustainability: weak
Fenntarthatùsèg: gyenge
The relevance of the Daphne programme is evaluated by the extent to which the objectives are and remain appropriate to the context, i.e. to the social needs the programme is meant to satisfy.
A Daphne program jelentﾒsïgït az hatèrozza meg, hogy a cïlkit｀zïsek mennyire jelentﾒsek, ïs mennyire maradnak azok a kontextus tekintetïben, azaz azon szocièlis igïnyek szempont-jèbùl, amelyeket a program kielïgóteni hivatott.
Relevance of the Daphne objectives to the social needs
A Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek jelentﾒsïge a szocièlis igïnyek szempontjèbùl
The «ghtagainstviolencecombinesalargenumberofinitiativesandactions.Daphnedoesnot aim to directly reduce the number of victims of violence.
Az erﾒszak elleni k Ÿ z d e l e m nagyszèmÿ kezdemïnyezïst ïs m｀veletet egyesót. A Daphne nem cïlozza k û z v e t l e n Ÿ l az erﾒszak èldozatai szèmènak csûkkentïsït.
Instead, the programme aims to support organisations whose actions contribute to protecting against violence, preventing it and assisting victims.
Ehelyett a program olyan szer-vezetek tèmogatèsèt veszi cïlba, amelyeknek m｀veletei hozzèjèrulnak az erﾒszak elleni vïde-lemhez, az erﾒszak megelﾒzïsïhez ïs az èldozatok segótïsïhez.
This explains the key role played by NGOs in Daphne since its origin.
Ez magyarèzatot szolgèltat arra, miïrt jètszanak kulcsszerepet a Daphnïban kezdettﾒl fogva a nem kormènyzati szervezetek.
The Daphne objectives were d e « n e d i n g e n e r a l t e r m s s o t h a t t h e y w o u l d b e v a l i d f o r m a n y d i . e r e n t tffy p e s o f v i o l e n c e .
A Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek nagy èltalènossègban lettek meghatèrozva, azïrt, hogy az erﾒszak sok fajtèjèra ïrvïnyesek legyenek. Hat Daphne-cïlkit｀zïs van:
‡ support to multidisciplinary networks;‡ exchange of good practice;
‒ ‒ ‒ multidiszciplinèris hèlùzatok tèmogatèsa;a bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïse; tanulmènyok, kutatès ïs adatgy｀jtïs;
‡ studies, research and data collection;‡ information campaigns;‡ information sources;‡ recognition and reporting of violence.
‒ ‒ ‒ tèjïkoztatèsi kampènyok;tèjïkoztatù forrèsok;az erﾒszak felismerïse ïs jelentïse.
By being independent from the areas of violence covered, these objectives are not in‹uencedby priorities set annually on aspects of violence.
Mivel a fenti cïlkit｀zïsek f Ÿ g g e t l e n e k az erﾒszak ïrintett t e r Ÿ l e t e i t ﾒ l , ezeket nem befolyèsol-jèk az erﾒszak aspektusai k û z Ÿ l ïvente kijelûlt prioritèsok.
In addition, these objectives are instruments rather than objectives, stricto sensu.
Tovèbbè: ezek a cïlkit｀zïsek sokkal inkèbb eszkûzûk, mint szigorÿ ïrtelemben vett cïlkit｀zïsek.
In fact, they contribute to the more general meta-objec-tives that implicitly underpin the programme, i.e. European response to violence through networking and exchange of best practice, prevention and protection of victims, increased awareness (see Graph 2 below).
Voltakïppen azokhoz az èltalèno-sabb metacïlkit｀zïsekhez jèrulnak hozzè, amelyeken a program kimondatlanul nyugszik, azaz: eurùpai vèlasz az erﾒszakra hèlùzatïpótïsen ïs a legjobb gyakorlat kicserïlïsïn k e r e s z - t Ÿ l , az erﾒszak megelﾒzïse, az èldozatok vïdelme ïs a tèjïkozottsèg nûvelïse (lèsd alèbb a 2. èbrèt).
Continuing relevance
Folyamatos jelentﾒsïg
The fact that these objectives remained relevant over the years is evident to a majority of stakeholders interviewed.
Az a tïny, hogy ezek a cïlkit｀zïsek ïveken èt relevènsak maradtak, vilègosan kit｀nik a meg-kïrdezett ïrdekeltek zûmïnek vïlemïnyïbﾒl.
For some of them, the programme represented an improvement on the initiative in this respect, as the objectives partly moved from awareness-raising through informing, to changing behaviours, which is the most crucial impact.
Nïhènyuk szèmèra a program ebben a tekin-tetben elﾒrelïpïst jelentett a kezdemïnyezïshez kïpest, minthogy a cïlkit｀zïsek a tèjïko-zottsèg nûvelïsïrﾒl a tèjïkoztatèson èt a viselkedïs megvèltoztatèsèra, vagyis a leginkèbb kritikus hatèsra tolùdtak.
In fact, raising awareness does not `naturally' provoke changes in behaviour; those changes require time, resources, organisational variation, etc.
A tèjïkozottsèg nûvelïse voltakïpp nem vonja ¶termïszetes mùdon• maga utèn a viselkedïs megvèltozèsèt; az ilyen vèltozèsokhoz idﾒ s z Ÿ k s ï g e s , valamint erﾒ-forrèsok, szervezeti vèltozèsok stb.
Some stakeholders also envisage that, in the medium term, prevention should increase in importance relative to the protection of victims.
Bizonyos ïrdekeltek ÿgy lètjèk, hogy kûzïptèvon a megelﾒzïs nagyobb hangsÿlyt kell, hogy kapjon, mint az èldozatok vïdelme.
Several stakeholders point to the critical im-portance of the treatment of o.endersasameansofpreventingfurtherviolence.
Szèmos ïrdekelt fïl az elkûvetﾒk kezelïsït mint a tovèb-bi erﾒszak megelﾒzïsïnek eszkûzït tartja kritikus fontossègÿnak.
The relevance of the Daphne objectives and their permanence are also evidenced by the growth of the funds requested by proposers between 1997 and 2002, indicating how impor-tant the demand and the needs are and remain.
A Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek jelentﾒsïgït ïs idﾒtèllùsègèt az 1997 ïs 2002 kûzûtti pèlyèzùk tèmo-gatèsigïnyïnek nûvekedïse is igazolja, mely azt is mutatja, hogy a kereslet ïs az igïnyek fontosak, ïs azok is maradnak.
The e . e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe i s a s s e s s e d b y t h e e x t e n t t o w h i c h t h e o u tp uijt s a n d impacts contribute to the achievement of the Daphne objectives.
A Daphne program hatèsossègèt az hatèrozza meg, hogy a vóvmènyok ïs hatèsok milyen mïrtïkben jèrulnak hozzè a Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek megvalùsótèsèhoz.
For each project, a link was made between its outputs and the Daphne objectives they support.
Minden egyes projekt esetïben az ïrtïkelïs kapcsolatot teremtett a vóvmènyok ïs a tèmoga-tott Daphne-cïlkit｀zïsek kûzûtt.
Out of 699 outputs, 601 strongly or very strongly support the Daphne objectives as follows:
699 vóvmènybùl 601 erﾒsen vagy nagyon erﾒsen tèmogatja a Daphne-cïlkit｀zïseket. Rïszletesen:
Studies, research or"""data collection"""
"" vagy adatgy｀jtïs
" multidisciplinary networks""
" hèlùzatok tèmogatèsa""
Information campaigns"""
Az erﾒszak felismerïse ïs
Recognition"""and reportingon violence""
Tèjïkoztatù
Graph 1: Support of outputs to programme's objectives
1. èbra: A program cïlkit｀zïseit tèmogatù vóvmènyok
N = 601 outputs with high or very high contribution: iconferences, seminars, workshops; istudies, reports and books; i"information materials; i"guidelines, training packages, manuals; iwebsites, CDs and CD-ROMs
601 vóvmèny hozzèjèrulèsa nagy vagy igen nagy: Konferencièk, szeminèriumok, m｀helyek i; Tanulmènyok, je-lentïsek ïs kûnyvek i; Tèjïkoztatù anyagok i ; Irènymutatèsok, oktatùcsomagok, ÿtmutatùk i ; Webhelyek, CD-k ïs CD-ROM-ok i
Graph 1 should be interpreted as follows: 15 % of the outputs contribute to the objective `sup-port to multi-disciplinary networks', and they are composed of 38 % of `conferences, seminars and workshops', 16 % of `studies, reports and books' and 11 % of `information materials'.
A fenti diagramot a kûvetkezﾒkïpp kell ïrtelmezni: A vóvmènyok 15%-a jèrul hozzè a ¶multidiszciplinèris hèlùzatok tèmogatèsa• cïlkit｀zïshez; 38%-ban ¶konferencièk, szeminèri-umok ïs m｀helyek•, 16%-ban ¶tanulmènyok, jelentïsek ïs kûnyvek•, 11%-ban ¶tèjïkoztatù anyagok• rïvïn.
Main impacts
Fﾒ hatèsok
Support for multidisciplinary networks
A bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïse
Exchange of good practices
Eurùpai vèlasz az erﾒszak kïrdïseire hèlùzatïpótïsen ïs a bevèlt gyakorlat kicserïlïsïn, illetve tanulmènyokon k e r e s z t Ÿ l
Adoption of good practices66 %
A bevèlt gyakorlatok ètvïtele 66%
European response to issues of violence through networking, exchange of good practices and studies
Tanulmènyok, kutatès vagy adatgy｀jtïs
Improved expertise64 %
Szakïrtelem nûvelïse 64%
Studies, research or data collection
Az erﾒszak megelﾒzïse/vïdelem az erﾒszakkal szemben
Improved means and/oraccess to assistance 57 %
A segótsïgnyÿjtès eszkûzeinek ïs/vagy elïrhetﾒsïgïnek javulèsa 57%
Prevention / protectionfrom violence
Tèjïkoztatù forrèsok
Information sources
Tèjïkoztatèsi kampènyok
Improved awareness of issues of violence and of end bene«ciaries' situation: 76 %
Nagyobb fokÿ tèjïkozottsèg az erﾒszakkal kapcsolatos kïrdïsek ïs a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettek helyzetïnek tekintetïben: 76%
Increased awareness of issues of violence
Nagyobb fokÿ tèjïkozottsèg az erﾒszakkal kapcsolatos kïrdïsek tekintetïben
Visibility / discussion of violence 67 %
Az erﾒszak lèthatùsèga/megvitatèsa 67%
Openness to experiencefrom other countries: 52 %
Nyitottsèg mès orszègokbeli tapasztalatok felï: 52%
Graph 2: Contribution of impacts to programme's objectives
2. èbra: A hatèsok hozzèjèrulèsa a program cïlkit｀zïseihez
Note: Percentages in the `Main impacts' boxes are the frequencies of projects having recorded such an impact.
(A ¶Fﾒ hatèsok• dobozban szereplﾒ szèzalïkïrtïkek az olyan projektek gyakorisègèt jelzik, amelyekben ilyen hatèst megèllapótottak.)
Only the most important impacts (above 45 % of frequencies) are displayed and only the main relations with objectives are shown, in the interests of readability.
Csak a legfontosabb hatèsok lettek f e l t Ÿ n t e t v e (45%-os gyakorisèg felett), tovèbbè csak a cïlki-t｀zïsekkel valù legfontosabb kapcsolatok szerepelnek a kûnnyebb olvashatùsèg ïrdekïben.
It is no surprise that the proportion of outputs supporting a given objective is commensurate with the number of projects tackling that objective.
Nem meglepﾒ, hogy az adott cïlkit｀zïst tèmogatù vóvmènyok rïszarènya szoros kapcsolatban èll a szùban forgù cïlkit｀zïst ïrintﾒ projektek szèmèval.
The striking «gurehereisthattheobjective`exchangeofgoodpractice'issupportedbymorethan a third of the outputs.
A legszembet｀nﾒbb adat az, hogy a ¶bevèlt gyakorlatok kicserïlïse• cïlkit｀zïst a vóvmènyok-nak tûbb mint az egyharmada tèmogatja.
This shows (a) the importance of that objective for the participants and (b) the real added value of the Daphne programme in transferring knowledge from coun-try to country and from organisation to organisation throughout Europe.
Ez jelzi a) a szùban forgù cïlkit｀zïs jelentﾒsïgït a rïsztvevﾒk szèmèra, b) a Daphne program valùs hozzèadott ïrtïkït a tudès ètadèsèban egyik orszègbùl a mèsikba, egyik szervezettﾒl egy mèsikhoz, Eurùpèn èt.
On the other hand, the objective `information sources' is more neglected. Special attention should therefore be devoted to this aspect in Daphne II.
Ezzel szemben a ¶tèjïkoztatù forrèsok• cïlkit｀zïs kevesebb «gyelmetkapott.KŸlûn«gyelmetkell tehèt fordótani a Daphne II program ezen aspektusèra.
Looking at the diagram the other way round, it appears that encouraging people to work together (by `Conference, seminars and workshops') is the output that contributes most to the objectives and promotes all of them.
Fordótva tekintve a diagramra: ÿgy t｀nik, hogy a kûzûs munka ûsztûnzïse (¶konferencièk, szeminèriumok, m｀helyek• ÿtjèn) jelenti azt a vóvmènyt, amely a legtûbb cïlkit｀zïshez hoz-zèjèrul, ïs elﾒmozdótja az ûsszest.
The output `Studies, reports and books' also signi«-cantly contributes to all the objectives.
A ¶tanulmènyok, jelentïsek ïs kûnyvek• is jelentﾒsen hoz-zèjèrul az ûsszes cïlkit｀zïshez.
It is also interesting to note that `Training packages and manuals' has an in‹uenceonthreeobjectives, con«rmingtheneedtokeeptraininghighontheagenda.
Ïrdemes arra is fel«gyelni,hogyaz¶oktatùcsomagokïsÿtmutatùk•hèromcïlkit｀zïsrevanhatèssal, ami alètèmasztja a kïpzïs napirenden tartèsènak fontossègèt.
Moreover, there is no signi«cantdi.erenceinthequalityoftheoutputsfromoneobjectiveto the other.
Tovèbbè: nincs lïnyeges minﾒsïgi k Ÿ l û n b s ï g a vóvmènyok minﾒsïgïben az egyes cïlkit｀zï-sek kûzûtt.
In addition, each programme objective is also supported by impacts.
E z e n f e l Ÿ l a program minden egyes cïlkit｀zïsït a hatèsok is tèmogatjèk.