natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ juvenile justice and protecting the victim from being re-victimised ̌ an emerging issue at international level and in Europe in particular in relation to the criminalisation of tra/ck-ing victims;
‡ mi a tanèrok, gondozùk, testvïrek, csalèd, a tèrsadalom ïs mès potencièlis vïdelmezﾒk szerepe, ïs hogyan lehet s z e r e p Ÿ k e t maximalizèlni a nﾒk ïs gyermekek bèntalmazèsa el-leni vïdelemben?
‡ behaviour patterns of abusers and methods of criminal cooperation ̌ an important «rststep in intervening in the area of the perpetrator and an important statement of the need to understand how they work;
‡ melyek a bèntalmazès jelei, illetve hogyan ismerhetﾒk fel ïs jelenthetﾒk be annak ïrdekï-ben, hogy mèr a bèntalmazèskor be lehessen avatkozni?
‡ support mechanisms for women and children being abused and e.ectivereportingandintervention ̌ « r s t mffe n t i o nffo f s p e c i « c d i r e c t s up po r t a c t i o n , w h i c h l e d t o D a p h n e b e i n g cffo n s i d e r e d in NGO circles as a `victim-based' programme;
Ez egy fontos, cïlzott vèltozata a ¶rèïbresztﾒ-tudatfokozù• megoldèsnak, melynek cïlja, hogy a bèntalmazès ellen potenci-èlisan vïdelmet nyÿjtù szereplﾒk felismerhessïk, mikor kell f e l l ï p n i Ÿ k a bèntalmazès meg-akadèlyozèsa ïs az èldozat segótïse ïrdekïben;
‡ self-help mechanisms for victims of violence ̌ a suggestion to promote full participation of victims and their empowerment, a theme that continued throughout the initiative and programme;
Îgy egyetlen projektet sem javasoltak elfogadâsra, ês a kêrdês teljesen lekerült a Daphne program napirendjêr┸l.
‡ statistical overviews of patterns of abuse, demographic trends, vulnerable groups, etc. ̌ recognition of the dire paucity of statistical mapping of the problem of violence in Europe, a recurring theme in subsequent years;
‡ a «atalkorÿakigazsègszolgèltatèsaïsazèldozatvïdelmeattùl,hogyismïtèldozattèvèljon.Egy nemzetkûzi szinten ïs Eurùpèban egyre inkèbb f e l m e r Ÿ l ﾒ tïma k Ÿ l û n û s e n az èldoza-tokkal valù kereskedelem kriminalizèlùdèsa kapcsèn;
‡ behaviour modi«cationofabusersandvictimšsuggestingthoughtonwaystomovebeyond `awareness-raising' to promote actual change in behaviour;
Az elkûvetﾒ ol-dalèrùl tûrtïnﾒ beavatkozès elsﾒ lïpïsekïnt annak tudatosótèsa, hogy r e n d k ó v Ÿ l fontos az elkûvetﾒket motivèlù mechanizmusok megïrtïse;
‡ role of privacy and disclosure ̌ a response to analysis of the «rstyear'sproposals,wheremany projects demonstrated poor understanding of the rights of con«dentialityofbothvictims and perpetrators, and a prerequisite for any work on data collection and storage;
‡ tèmogatù mechanizmusok a bèntalmazott nﾒk ïs gyermekek szèmèra, eredmïnyes beje-lentïs ïs hatïkony beavatkozès. Elﾒszûr szerepelnek olyan speci«kusankûzvetlentèmo-gatù akciùk, amelyek miatt a Daphne az ¶èldozatkûzpontÿ program• megótïlïst kapta a nem kormènyzati szervezetek kûreiben;
‡ the image of the child and of women and the role of advertising, broadcast and print media and other mass media in protection and prevention ̌ an attempt to mobilise and inform press players in Europe in the wake of continued broad coverage of such issues demonstrating incomplete understanding;
‡ az erﾒszak èldozatait tèmogatù ûnsegïlyezﾒ mechanizmusok. Ez a tïma, amely egy javas-lat arra, hogy az èldozatok teljes jogaikkal felruhèzva vegyenek rïszt a programban, fïm-jelzi a kezdemïnyezïst ïs az egïsz Daphne programot;
‡ the impact of pornography, in particular of child pornography ̌ aimed at complementing work done elsewhere in the Commission on the vehicles used to transmit pornography.
‡ a bèntalmazèsi mintèk, a demogrè«aitrendek,alegsebezhetﾒbbcsoportokstb.statisztikaièttekintïse, mely mûgûtt az a felismerïs èll, hogy Eurùpa-szerte megdûbbentﾒen szegï-nyes az erﾒszak statisztikai regisztrèciùja. Az utùbbi ïvekben vissza-visszatïrﾒ tïma ez;
In the event, the projects subsequently accepted for funding did indeed re‹ectthesesugges-tions, even if they did not in most cases exactly reproduce them.
‡ az elkûvetﾒk ïs èldozatok viselkedïsïnek vèltozèsa. Ez sugallja azt, hogy a ¶rèïbresztïs-tudatfokozès• mùdszerïn tÿllïpve kell elﾒsegóteni a viselkedïs tïnyleges vèltozèsèt;
Many more projects in the second year of the Daphne initiative aimed to undertake research or studies as a basis for then developing actions or tools for action.
‡ a titoktartès ïs felfedïs szerepe.
Many of the projects aimed to «lltheidenti«edgapsin a modest way by «rstpilotingactionswithindistinctvulnerablegroupssuchasruralwom-en, or young people living in institutions.
Vèlasz az elsﾒ ïvben tett javaslatok elemzïseire, ahol sok projektbﾒl az t｀nt ki, hogy az èldozatokkal ïs az elkûvetﾒkkel kapcsolatos titoktartèshoz valù jogot nem ïrtelmeztïk kellﾒkïppen.
In this way, the Daphne initiative began to lay the foundations of much more solid and usable knowledge and practical experience.
Ez azonban az adatgy｀jtïssel ïs -tèrolèssal kap-csolatban vïgzett munka elﾒfeltïtele;
E . o r t s t o l e a r n l e s s o n s f r o m i n i t i a l e x p e r i e n c e s o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e , a n d t o bu i l d t h e s e i n t o an improved programme that would be more likely to have real impact, grow the knowl-edge base in Europe and produce value for the European Commission, were supported by the creation in 1998 of a simple newsletter called Daphne News.
‡ a gyermek ïs a nﾒ imèzsa, valamint a reklèm, a m｀sorszùrès, a nyomtatott mïdia ïs mès tûmegmïdia szerepe a vïdelemben ïs megelﾒzïsben.
This Commission initiative was designed s p e c i « c a l l y t o ` po s i t i o n ' D a p h n e a s a p r o g r a m mffe t h a t s up po r t e d a n a l y s i s a n d r e ‹ e c t i o n , i nfo r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e a n d n e t w o r k i n g nffo t o n l y b y o t h e r a g e n c i e s bu t w i t h t h e a c t i v e participation of the Commission.
Egy kósïrlet az eurùpai mïdiumok szereplﾒinek mozgùsótèsèra ïs tèjïkoztatèsèra, ïrdekelttï tïve ﾒket az ilyen kïrdïsekkel kapcsolatos, a kïrdïs hiènyos megïrtïsït èbrèzolù szïles kûr｀ hórszolgèltatèsban;
It was used to share with organisations that were implementing projects or that had already completed project activity ideas about inter-esting projects as well as lists, for example, of newly selected projects.
E n n e k c ï lj a , h o g y k i e g ï s z ó t s e a Bizottsègon b e l Ÿ l mèshol vïgzett, a pornogrè«ètterjesztﾒeszkûzûkfelszèmolèsèrairènyu-lù munkèt.
Through this list, in particular, organisations were able to learn about other organisations working in the same area as them in other Member States.
Noha az utùlag «nanszórozèsraelfogadottprojektektartalmaztèkisezeketajavaslatokat,azesetek tûbbsïgïben nem adtèk vissza pontosan azokat.
Over time, many of the organisations contacted each other and proposed partnerships for new Daphne projects ̌ to the extent, in fact, that peo-ple within the organisations and indeed at the Commission began to talk about `the Daphne family'.
A Daphne kezdemïnyezïs mèsodik ïvïben nem egy projekt t｀zte ki cïlul az akkor kialakótès alatt lïvﾒ fellïpïsek alapjèul szolgè-lù kutatèsok vagy tanulmènyok elvïgzïsït, illetve eszkûzûk lïtrehozèsèt ezekhez a fellïpï-sekhez.
These partnerships have in many cases continued long beyond the duration of the Daphne project that gave rise to them and in some cases have become structural.
Sok projekt tûrekedett arra, hogy a legsebezhetﾒbb kûzûssïgekben (vidïki nﾒk, in-tïzmïnyekben lakù « a t a l o k ) v ï g z e t t k ó s ï r l e t i f e l l ï p ï s e k k e l k i k Ÿ s z û b û lj e a b e a z offn o s ó t o t t h ï - z a g o k a t .
For exam-ple, a 1998 project implemented by Radda Barnen (Save the Children Sweden) that identi«eda small NGO as a partner in Spain resulted in the Spanish organisation in time becoming Save the Children Spain.
Ily mùdon a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs rakta le elsﾒkïnt egy szilèrdabb lèbakon èllù ïs hasznèlhatùbb tudès ïs gyakorlati tapasztalat alapjait.
Unfortunately, the compilation, writing and distribution of Daphne News was time-consuming for the small team of people working on the Daphne initiative. Daphne News ceased to exist after the third issue in May 1999 and is now replaced by a website, regularly updated.
Az 1998-ban Daphne Hórek (Daphne News) cómmel ÿtjèra indótott hórlevïl cïlja ûsszetett volt: minïl tûbb tanulsègot levonni a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs eredeti tapasztalataibùl, ezeket in-tegrèlni egy nagy valùszón｀sïggel valùs hatèst kifejteni kïpes programba, kiszïlesóteni az eurùpai tudèsalapot, ïs ïrtïket teremteni az Eurùpai Bizottsèg szèmèra.
Its ad-dress is: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Ez a kezdemïnyezïs azzal a cïllal indult el, hogy a Daphnït az elemzﾒ gondolkodèst, az informèciùcserït ïs a hè-lùzatïpótïst nemcsak a tûbbi Ÿgynûksïg kûrïben, hanem a Bizottsèg aktóv rïszvïtelïvel tè-mogatù programkïnt ¶aposztrofèljèk•.
Again in 1999, the last year of the Daphne initiative, the lessons learned through project visits, reports (including a «rstexternalevaluationreportbyanindependentteamofexpertsonthe1997 initiative) and selection and monitoring processes were built into the call for proposals and guidelines for applicants.
A Daphne Hórek kûzïrthetﾒ stólusban szèmolt be a Daphne kezdemïnyezïsrﾒl ïs az ellenﾒrzûtt projektekrﾒl. Fﾒ k Ÿ l d e t ï s e az volt, hogy a projekteket vïgrehajtù, illetve projekteket mèr le-futtatott szervezeteket tèjïkoztassèk az ïrdekes programokrùl, illetve kûzzïtegyïk a frissen kivèlogatott projektek listèit.
Aims and priorities
Cïlok ïs prioritèsok mos szervezet kapcsolatba lïpett egymèssal, ïs partnerkïnt jelentkezett az ÿj Daphne-pro-jektekhez.
«rstquarterof2000,gaveorganisationsconsideringapplyingforfundingtheopportunitytoread through the «nalreportsofallprojectscompletedin1997and,throughasimplekey-word search, to pay particular attention to work that had been done in the area in which they were considering submitting a project.
Ez pedig lassan olyan mïrtïket ûltûtt, hogy maguk a szervezeteknïl ïs a Bizott-sègnèl dolgozùk mèr ¶Daphne csalèdrùl• kezdtek beszïlni.
It had been noted, when project submissions for 1998 were read, that many of the projects claimed to be suggesting activities that would be attempted `for the «rsttimeever'when,infact, such activities had already been undertaken in Europe or indeed even funded by the Daphne initiative itself.
Ezek a partnersïgek sok esetben megmaradtak az ﾒket lïtrehozù Daphne-projekt lejèrta utèn is, ïs egyes esetekben szervezett egysïggï kovècsolùdtak.
The call for proposals in 1999 therefore emphasised the need for or-ganisations preparing projects to inform themselves of actions that had already been imple-mented and, where possible, to build on these or adapt them either for broader EU coverage or for application in di.erentcircumstances.Thisencouragementto`build'ratherthan`rein-vent' was in fact repeated each year from 1999, although a large number of project submis-sions continued to suggest actions that did not take account of previous experience.
Erre pïlda a Radda Barnen (Mentsd Meg a Gyermekeket Svïdorszèg) èltal megvalùsótott egyik 1998. ïvi projekt, amikor egy kisebb nem kormènyzati spanyol szer-vezetet kïrt fel spanyolorszègi partnerekïnt, s ebbﾒl lïtrejûtt a Mentsd Meg a Gyermekeket Spanyolorszèg szervezet.
In 1999, a number of new issues also began to emerge, however.
Sajnos azonban a Daphne Hórek szerkesztïse, megórèsa ïs terjesztïse nagyon idﾒigïnyes fel-adat volt a Daphne kezdemïnyezïsben dolgozù marïknyi munkatèrs szèmèra, s az ÿjsèg az 1999. mèjusi harmadik szèm utèn megsz｀nt.
In particular, the focus on raising awareness of violence against women in Europe in 1999 prompted an increase in awareness-raising projects on gendered violence in general and on domestic violence in par-ticular.
Jelenleg egy rendszeresen frissótett weboldal helyettesóti, melynek cóme: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Projects on the clandestine migration of unaccompanied minors, on the rights of migrant domestic workers, on support to victims of tra/ckingandtopreventexploitationofmigrantand tra/ckedwomen,wereforerunnersofa growingnumberofprojectsthat,inthefollow-ing years, r e ‹ e c t e d a n i m po r t a n t n e w w o r k l o a d f o r N G O s a n d p u b l i c a uijt h o r i t i e s i n E u r op e .
A Daphne kezdemïnyezïs utolsù ïvïben (1999-ben) a projektlètogatèsok sorèn levont kû-vetkeztetïseket, a jelentïseket (beleïrtve az 1997. ïvi kezdemïnyezïsrﾒl egy f Ÿ g g e t l e n szak-ïrtﾒcsoport èltal kïszótett elsﾒ k Ÿ l s ﾒ ïrtïkelﾒ jelentïst) ïs a kivèlogatèsi ïs ellenﾒrzïsi eljèrè-sokat beïpótettïk az ajènlatkïrïsekbe, valamint a pèlyèzùk irènymutatèsaiba.
I m po r t a n t issues such as rape, female genital mutilation (FGM) and violence in the aftermath of cffo n ‹ i c t a l s o « g u r e d f o r t h e « r s t t i mffe a m o n g D a p h n e - f u n d e d p r o j e c t s .
Emellett a 2000. elsﾒ negyedïvïben indótott Daphne-weboldal a «nanszórozèsikïrelembenyÿjtèsètfontolga-tù szervezetek szèmèra lehetﾒsïget nyÿjtott arra, hogy betekintïst nyerjenek az 1997-ben lezèrt ûsszes projektrﾒl szùlù zèrùjelentïsbe, ïs egyszer｀ kulcsszavas keresïssel tekintsïk èt az azon a t e r Ÿ l e t e n vïgzett munkèt, amelyen a projekt benyÿjtèsèt fontolgatjèk.
While Daphne projects continued, therefore, to re‹ectwellthenatureofdebateandneedsrelated to violence in Europe, some problems noted from the very beginning of the initiative persisted.
Ïrdekes volt, hogy az 1998. ïvi pèlyèzatok olvastèn sok projektben szerepelt, hogy ¶ÿjszer｀ tevïkenysïg•, amely ¶a vilègon e g y e d Ÿ l è l l ù • , mikûzben mèr volt hasonlù tevïkenysïg Eurù-pèban, esetenkïnt a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs tèmogatèsèval is.
These related mostly to project design and management, and suggested a contin-ued need for improvements in the capacity of organisations, for the Commission to continue to monitor and provide technical advice to projects, and for ongoing work in the Daphne `team' itself to draw lessons, analyse trends and develop the initiative in the light of this re‹ec-tion.
Az 1999. ïvi ajènlatkïrïs ezïrt hangsÿlyozta, hogy a projektkïszótﾒ szervezetek elﾒbb tèjïkozùdjanak a mèr megvalùsult akciùkrùl, lehetﾒsïg szerint vegyïk ezeket alapul, vagy terjesszïk ki azokat az Uniùban. 1999-tﾒl kezdﾒdﾒen ïvrﾒl ïvre szorgalmaztèk, hogy a szervezetek az ¶ÿjrafelfedezïs• helyett az ¶elﾒzmïnyekre• ïpótsenek.
In regard to project preparation and planning, there were still weaknesses in:
Ennek ellenïre szèmos pèlyèzù tovèbbra is olyan akciùkat java-solt, amelyek « g y e l m e n k ó v Ÿ l h a g y t è k a k o r è b b i t a p a s z t a l a t o k a t .
‡ focusing on cause and e.ectandmatchingactionstotheproblemstheyaimedtosolve;
A nﾒk elleni erﾒszak jelensïgïre valù ¶rèïbresztïsnek• kûszûnhetﾒen szèmos ¶rèïbresztﾒ• projekt indult ÿtjèra a nemi erﾒszakkal ïs k Ÿ l û n û s e n a csalèdon b e l Ÿ l i erﾒszakkal kapcsolatosan.
‡ learning lessons and knowing how to share these with appropriate groups, and in particu-lar spreading these in appropriate form and with added value in other Member States;
Az eurùpai bevèndorlèst kósïrﾒ kûz- ïs politikai «-gyelem fokozùdèsa, valamint az aggèly, hogy e kïrdïs fïlreïrtelmezïse diszkriminèciùt s z Ÿ l , ïs az Eurùpèban ïlﾒ ïs dolgozù bevèndorlùk bèntalmazèsèhoz vezet, szèmos, a bevèndorlùk jogaira, valamint a fajgy｀lûlet ïs diszkriminèciù èldozatainak tèmogatèsèra ûsszpontosótù projekt elindótèsèt ûsztûnûzte.
‡ using the budget to facilitate implementation and output, rather than as a simple `costing' exercise;
Az olyan fontos kïrdïsek, mint a nemi erﾒszak, a nﾒi nemi szervek megcsonkótèsa ïs k offn ‹ i k t u s s z Ÿ l t e e r ﾒ s z a k s z i n t ï n e l ﾒ s z û r j e l e n t e k m e g a D a p h n e è l t a l « n a n s z ó r o z o t t p r o j e k t e k t ï m è i kûzûtt.
Many submissions remained local, with token partnerships set up purely for the purpose of satisfying the Daphne selection criteria.
Noha a Daphne-projektek tovèbb folytatùdtak, ahhoz, hogy az eurùpai erﾒszakkal kapcsola-tos vitèk ïs a mïg hiènyzù intïzkedïsek tovèbbra is a «gyelemkûzïppontjèbanmaradjanak,megmaradt nïhèny, a kezdemïnyezïs kezdetei ùta lïtezﾒ problïma.
A large number of projects did not seem to realise
Ezek tûbbnyire a projekt kialakótèsèt ïs irènyótèsèt ïrintettïk, szorgalmaztèk a szervezetek kapacitèsènak fejlesztïsït,
Aims and priorities the potential that having partners in other Member States o.erednotonlyforbroadcoveragebut for improved understanding and analysis, and for support.
Cïlok ïs prioritèsok ïs azt, hogy a Bizottsèg tovèbbra is kûvesse nyomon a projekteket, adjon azokhoz technikai tanècsot, a Daphne-¶team• pedig vonja le a s z Ÿ k s ï g e s kûvetkeztetïseket, elemezze a trende-ket, ïs e gondolatok fïnyïben fejlessze tovèbb a kezdemïnyezïst.
On a more positive note, the projects selected continued to break new ground in a number of ways:
A projektek elﾒkïszótïsïben ïs tervezïsïben az alèbbi t e r Ÿ l e t e k e n mutatkoztak gyengesï-gek:
‡ they sometimes piloted new or variant methodologies, often across a number of d i . e r e n t Mffe m b e r States;
‡ ûsszpontosótès az okra ïs hatèsra, valamint a megoldandù problïmèhoz illeszkedﾒ fellï-pïsekre;
‡ the output of many projects was of a high standard and usable in several Member States, sometimes all;
‡ kûvetkeztetïsek levonèsa, azok megosztèsa a megfelelﾒ csoportokkal ïs mès tagèllamok-ban valù t e r j e s z t ï s Ÿ k a megfelelﾒ formèban, hozzèadott ïrtïkkel;
‡ new insights were gained through research, studies and data collection, and in particular this often included comparative analysis across the EU;
‡ partnerek felkutatèsa a hatùkûr ïs hatïkonysèg javótèsèra;
‡ the support of the Commission opened doors for many organisations and enhanced their ability to function within their own environment and at European (and in some cases in-ternational) level.
‡ a vïgrehajtès ïs eredmïny elﾒmozdótèsèt szolgèlù kûltsïgvetïs igïnybevïtele szemben az egyszer｀ ¶kûltsïgelszèmolès• gyakorlatèval;
[External evaluation of Project 97/066/WC]
‡ eredmïnyek ïs teljesótmïny ïrtïkelïse.
By the time the Daphne programme 2000›03 was launched in 2000, an enormous amount of new work had emerged from the three-year experience of the Daphne initiative, and the Com-mission's commitment to this work was regularly talked about in international circles.
Sok pèlyèzat megmaradt helyi szinten, ïs sok jelkïpes partnersïg jûtt lïtre csak azïrt, hogy a pèlyèzat megfeleljen a Daphne program szelekciùs szempontjainak. àgy t｀nt, hogy a pro-jektek tûbbsïge nem volt tisztèban azzal, milyen elﾒnyûkkel jèr, ha partnereik vannak a tûbbi tagèllamban, s ezzel nemcsak szïlesebb kûrben tudjèk t e v ï k e n y s ï g Ÿ k e t kifejteni, hanem ked-vezﾒbb elbórèlèst, elemzïst ïs tèmogatèst kapnak.
The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child received a b r i e « n g o n D a p h n e i n 1 9 9 9 ; t h e f o l l o w - up r e po r t to the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children listed Daphne as an example of good regional practice. The `spirit' of Daphne, characterised as:
Ha der｀lètùbban s z e m l ï lj Ÿ k a helyzetet, a kivèlasztott projektek tovèbbra is ÿttûrﾒk voltak, hiszen:
‡ taking calculated risks to break new ground,
‡ ÿj vagy eltïrﾒ mùdszereket kósïrleteztek ki nemegyszer szèmos tagèllam bevonèsèval;
‡ learning and sharing,
‡ eleddig ïrintetlen tïmèkba fogtak;
‡ supporting partnerships both in projects and with the Commission,
‡ sok projekt eredmïnye magas szónvonalÿ ïs hasznèlhatù volt szèmos (olykor mindegyik) tagèllamban;
‡ promoting added value across the Member States,
‡ a kutatèsok, tanulmènyok ïs adatgy｀jtïsek ÿj betekintïst nyÿjtottak, s ez gyakran az egïsz Uniùra kiterjedﾒ ûsszehasonlótù elemzïst foglalt magèban;
‡ seeking to empower protection structures, groups and individuals,
¶A projektkoordinètorok megótïlïse szerint, ha egy projektet az ‚Eurùpai Bizottsèg§ neve fïm-jelzett, az dûntﾒ szerepet jètszott a projekt hiteles fellïpïsïben„ a teamvezetﾒk az iskolai ha-tùsègok rïszïrﾒl pl. azonnali attit｀dvèltozèst vettek ïszre.• (A 97/066/WC projekt k Ÿ l s ﾒ ïrtïkelïse.)
‡ tackling violence comprehensively from the angles of prevention, protection, support, re-habilitation and in the context of grassroots-level information about European and na-tional realities, was cited as a reason for the continued support of NGOs, public authorities and other players.
Mire 2000-ben a Daphne program 2000›2003 ÿtjèra indult, ùrièsi mennyisïg｀ munka halmo-zùdott fel a Daphne kezdemïnyezïs hèromïves tapasztalatèbùl, ïs a Bizottsèg elkûtelezett-sïge e munkèval kapcsolatosan nemzetkûzi kûrûkben is tïma volt.
The Commission's close engagement with the projects was hailed as a rare example of sup-port that went beyond funding to real commitment.
A nem kormènyzati szervezetek tèmogatèsa szilèrd volt, ïs a Daphne-projektek tapasztalatai mès rïgiùkban tartott konferencièkra ïs m｀helyekbe is eljutottak a vezetﾒ ïs partnerszerve-
This led to some complications.
‡ elsajètót ïs megoszt;
The « r s t w a s t h a t t h e i n c l u s i o nffo f t h e nffo n - mffe m b e r S t a t e cffo u n t r i e s d e p e n d e d o n f r a mffe w o r k a g r e e mffe n t s being in place between the EU and these States, and no agreement had as yet been « n a l i s e d b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d a p p l i c a n t S t a t e s .
‡ tèmogatja a partnersïget a projektekben ïs a Bizottsèggal egyarènt;
The second innovation, the opening-up of the call to local authorities as project leaders, was straightforward and gave rise to no new challenges, although in practice local authorities were slow to come forward as project leaders rather than partners.
‡ arra tûrekszik, hogy vïdelmezﾒ struktÿrèkat, csoportokat, egyïneket tegyen kïpessï a vïdelemre;
The third change, however, the inclusion of multiannual projects, a.ectedthemanagementof the overall Daphne budget and, indirectly, the selection of projects signi«cantly.Inthe«rstyear of the Daphne programme, the funds for projects of more than 12 months' duration had to be allocated out of that single year's budget.
‡ ètfogùan gètat vet az erﾒszaknak a megelﾒzïs, vïdelem, tèmogatès, rehabilitèciù eszkû-zïvel, ïs az eurùpai ïs nemzeti realitèsokrùl szùlù civil szint｀ informèciùval.
This could have seriously reduced the number of projects funded that year as, for example, one three-year project would take up the fund-ing for three one-year projects.
E ¶jellemrajz• ûsztûnûzte a nem kormènyzati szervezetek, hatùsègok ïs mès szereplﾒk tovèb-bi tèmogatèsèt.
This would risk discouraging applicants. As a result, it was decided to limit the number of multiannual projects in order not to seriously disadvantage those who felt that their capacity did not allow them to manage multiannual projects (for example, because the size of the organisation did not allow it to bear the burden of expend-iture against delayed reimbursement for more than one year at a time).
A Bizottsègnak a projektekkel szembeni szoros elkûtelezettsïgït pedig a tèmogatès olyan ritka pïldèjakïnt Ÿdvûzûltïk, amely a pïnzbeni tèmogatèson messze tÿl-menﾒen igazi elkûtelezettsïgrﾒl tanÿskodik.
‡ production of common frameworks for violence;
Ezek az ÿjótèsok azonban csak tovèbb bonyolótottèk a helyzetet.
‡ measurement of the impact of di.erenttypesofviolencetoestablishappropriatere-sponse;
KŸlûnûsen a hatèrokon ètóvelﾒ tïmèkkal (emberkereskedelem, ki-vèndorlès) foglalkozù projektek esetïben fel kellett kïrni a szervezeteket, hogy projektjeiket dolgozzèk èt, ha «nanszórozèstszeretnïnekkapni.
‡ assessment of measures and practices to prevent and detect violence in order to prevent future exposure to violence;
E szakïrtﾒk, a n ï l k Ÿ l hogy a projektek megtervezïsït jelentﾒsen befolyèsoltèk volna, nemcsak a vïgrehaj-tù szervezetek ïrdeklﾒdïsïre is szèmot tartù rïszletekre tudtèk a Daphne programkoordinè-
‡ information campaigns to raise awareness in the public, media and/or targeted profes-sional groups;
Cïlok ïs prioritèsok torènak «gyelmïtfelhóvni,dejavaslatottehettekatÿlnagykapacitèstlekûtﾒprojekteklerû-vidótïsïre, vagy ïpp fordótva, egy-egy projekt kihatèsèt fokozù kisebb kiegïszótïsekre.