natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This brochure contains the Council’s annual report on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents in 2007.
E z az is m e r t e t ő a d o k u m e n t u m o k h o z v a ló n y i l v á n o s h o z z á f é r és r ő l szól ó ,
The report, adopted by the Council in April 2008, presents the regulatory, administrative and practical adjustments made by the Council to ensure compliance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
E K r e n de l e t r e n de l k e z és e in e k va ló m e g f e l e l és é r de k é be n f o g a n a t o s í t o t t szabá l y z a ti, iga z g a t á s i és g y a k o r l a ti k i i g a z í t á sok a t.
In addition, the report highlights the key developments in the sixth year of implementation of the Regulation and reviews complaints submitted to the European Ombudsman as well as rulings given by the Community Courts in 2007 under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in cases concerning access to Council documents.
A j e l e n t és ezen f e l ü l k i e m e li a r e n de l e t vé g r e ha j t á s a ha t o d i k év é n e k k u l c s f o n t o s ságú f e j l e m é n y e it, á t t e k i n t i az e u r ó p a i om b u d s m a n h o z be n y új t o t t pa n a s z o k a t, va l a m in t a k ö z ö s s é g i b í r ó s á g o k n a k
Additional information (and previous reports) on access to Council documents and on other transparency issues can be found on the Internet website http://www.consilium.europa.eu, under "Documents".
, va l a m in t egy é b , á t l á t ha t ó s á g g a l ka p c s o l a t o s k é r d é s e k r e v o n a t k o z ó t o v á b b i in f o r m á c ió
REGULATORY, ADMINISTRATIVE AND PRACTICAL ADAPTATIONS
, IGAZGATÁSI
Fields covered by applications
A h o z z á f é r és i kérel m e k t á r g y á t k é p e z ő t e r ü l e t e k
Number of documents examined and refusals of access
A v i z s g á lt do k u m e n t u m o k és m e g t a g ad o tt h o z z á f é r é sek szám a
LEGAL ACTION
INTÉZKEDÉSEK
ANNEX: STATISTICS ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO COUNCIL DOCUMENTS
TANÁCS
Part II analyses the figures for applications for access during the reference period.
E K e u r ó p a i pa r l a m e n t i és t a n á c s i rende l e t 17.
See documents 7957/03, 8036/04 , 8896/05, 13354/1/06 REV 1 and 8184/07.
A k o r á b b i éve s j e l e n t és e k h e z ha s o n l ó a n e j e l e n t és
Page 9
. része a
In the case of sensitive documents3, the author specifies the references which may be permitted to appear in the register4
/EK r e n de l e t rende l k e z és e in e k va ló m e g f e l e l és c é l j á b ó l t e tt szabá l y o z á s i, iga z g a t á s i és g y a k o r l a ti k i i g a z í t á sok a t ta r t a l m az z a
• in the legislative field, "I/A" and "A" item notes submitted to Coreper and/or the Council, as well as draft legislative acts, draft common positions and joint texts approved by the Conciliation Committee to which they refer;
. rész k o n k r é t a b b a n f o g l a l k o z ik a h o z z á f é r és i jog a l ó l i, az
For the purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, "sensitive documents" means documents classified as "CONFIDENTIEL", "SECRET" or "TRÈS SECRET/TOP SECRET".
. rész p e d i g az e u r ó p a i om b u d s m a n h o z be n y új t o t t p a n a s z o k k a l és a m e g t e tt jogi in t é z k e d é s e k k e l fogl a l k o z i kfi. .
• documents which have been made available in full to a member of the public who made an application.
- r a v o n a t k o z ó j e l e n t és e i tek in t e t é ben lásd az
Consultations (in terms of number of screens viewed) totalled 9 212 745.
E l n ö k s é g rész é r e k ü l d ö tt, 2003
This makes for greater openness, particularly in the legislative field.
) be k ez d és éve l összhangban a
Legislative Transparency
- á n j e l e n t és t te tt közzé
In the case of the Council, these specific provisions are set out in Annex II to the Rules of Procedure.
, am e l y e k e t a n y i l v á n t a r t á s b a n a u t o m a t i k u s a r c h i v á l á s i rends z e r r év é n r ö g z í t e t t e kfi. .
It moreover follows from Article 207(3) of the EC Treaty concerning the implementation of Article 255(3) that the Council shall provide for greater access to its documents when it is acting in its legislative capacity.
T a n á c s vagy a n n a k v a l a m e ly e l ő k é s z í t ő s z e r v e rész é r e be n y új t o t t va l a m e n n y i o l y a n nem m in ő s í t e tt dokum e n t u m a u t o m a t i k u s an be k e r ü l a n y i l v á n t a r t á s b a
The same principle, applicable to the three institutions directly involved in the legislative process, is set out in Article 12(2) of Regulation 1049/2001.
, am e ly t a n á c s k o z á sok a l a p j á u l s z o l g á l, be f o l y á s o l ha t j a a d ö n t és h o z a t a li fol y a m a t o t v a gy t ü k r ö z i az egy ad o t t te r ü l e ten e l é rt
The monthly summary can be consulted on the Council's website http://www.consilium.europa.eu under the heading "Documents" – "Summary of Council acts".
A n y i l v á n t a r t á s h o z z á f é r és t bi z t o s ít na gy szám ú o l y a n d o k u m e n t u m t e l j e s s z ö v e g é h e z
As in previous years, in 2007 the Council Secretariat ran a series of training sessions12for Council staff responsible for document production in order to familiarise them with the procedures and practice to be followed as regards public access to documents.
T a n á c s és e l ő k é s z í t ő s z e r v e i ül és e in e k t e r v e z e tt na p i r e n d j e i (ka t o n a i és b i z t o n s á g i k é r d é s e k k e l f o g l a l k o z ó egy e s s z e r v e k k i v é t e l éve l);
In 2007, the "Transparency, access to documents and information to the public" Unit of the General Secretariat of the Council (DG F) had a staff of 19, allocated as follows:
T a n á c s h o z be n y új t o t t ol y a n d o k u m e n t u m o kfi, , a m e l y e k o l y a n n a p i r e n d i pont b a n s z e r e p e l n e k
Access to documents: Information to the public:
T a n á c s rész é r e be n y új t o t t fe l j egy z ések az
5 AD and 8 AST staff 6 AST staff.
” és az
The staff of the "Information to the public" section handles the requests for information from members of the public under the Code of good administrative behaviour for the General Secretariat of the Council13.
, va l a m in t az i l l e t é k e s egy e z t e t ő b i z o t tság á l t a l jóvá ha g y o t t jog a l k o t á s i a k t u s
Page 14
L á s d az
Moreover, the vast majority of journalists are mainly interested in the latest news.
343 d o k u m e n t u m o t bocsá t o t t a k a n y i l v á n o s s á g r e n de l k ez és é r e
Applications originating from non-EU countries represented 8 % of the total.
T a n á c s e l j á r á s i szabá l y z a t a
With regard to the initial applications, the grounds for refusal most frequently invoked were the protection of the decisionmaking process, which accounted for nearly two fifths of all refusals (38 %), followed by the protection of the public interest as regards international relations (15,1 %), public security (13,3 %), and defence and military matters (2,3 %).
• k ö z ö s á l l á s pont e l f o g a d á s á t, köz ö s s z ö v e g egy e z t e t ő b i z o t t s á g i j ó v á ha g y á s á t va gy jog a l k o t á s i a k t u s v é g l e g e s e l f o g a d á s á t köve tően v a l a m e ly jog a l k o t á s i ak t u s r a v o n a t k o z ó d o k u m e n t u m o k ;
It was not invoked at all at the confirmatory stage during the period under consideration, whereas it had been the grounds for 4,6 % of refusals in 2006.
• ha r m ad i k f é l t ő l szá r m azó dokum e n t u m o kfi, , a m e l y e k e t a s z e r z ő k ö z z é t e tt va gy a n n a k be l egy e z és éve l te ttek k ö z z é
While this exception is not the Council's most frequently invoked grounds for refusal, its importance for the proper functioning and effectiveness of the institution's work should nevertheless be emphasised17.
• a n y i l v á n o s ság va l a m e l y , k é r e l m e t be n y új t o t t tagj a szám á r a t e l j e s e g é s z é be n r e n de l k e z és r e b o c s á t o t t dokum e n t u m o kfi. .
If the Council were to lose that instrument, the efficiency of its work would be compromised.
217 d o k u m e n t u m o t t a r t a l m az o t t, am e l y b ő l 724
This is why it is in the public interest that the Council should have access to impartial legal advice.
(a n y i l v á n t a r t á s b a n s z e r e p l ők
This case-law was cited by the Court in its order of 23 October 2002 in case C-445/00, Austria v. Council, paragraph 12.
, azaz vagy l e t ö l t h e t ő for m á t u m b a n e l é r h e t ő
COM(2007) 185 of 18 April 2007, Green Paper: Public Access to Documents held by institutions of the European Community – A review.
- o s n ö v e k e d é s t a n y i l v á n t a rtáson k e r e s z t ü l k ö z v e t l e n ü l h o z z á f é r h e t ő d o k u m e n t u m ok szám á b a n
The outcome of the consultation was subsequently summarised in a
” d o k u m e n t u m ok á l t a l á b a n nem t ö l t h e tők l e
Commission staff working document published in January 200821, which inter alia contained the following findings:
, de k é r e l e m r e r e n de l k e z és r e b o c s á t ha tók
The vast majority of the respondents would prefer the public registers and web-sites of the institutions to be more harmonised and easier to access.
. ót a a rész be n h o z z á f é r h e t ő k é n t m in ő s í t e tt va l a m e n n y i új d o k u m e n t u m a n y i l v á n t a rtáson k e r e s z t ü l k ö z v e t l e n ü l h o z z á f é r h e t ő a n y i l v á n o s ság szám á r a
In this latter context, industry called for better protection of business information.
- n y i l v á n t a r t á s á t, am i egy év a l a tt a f e l ha s z n á l ó k szám á n a k
An Interinstitutional Committee to examine best practice, address possible conflicts and discuss future developments on public access to documents was established in 2002 under Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
T a n á cson vagy e l ő k é s z í t ő s z e r v e in be l ü l i m e g be s z é lések t á r g y á t k é p e z i, és az ily e n d o k u m e n t u m a de l e g á c iók á l l á s pont j á t tükr ö z i, ol y a n h e l y z e t á l l ha t e l ő
The discussion was concentrated on the main topics, which had been the subject of the public consultation, and on the need for increasing the userfriendliness of the public registers of the three institutions, notably through the creation of a common Internet portal.
, és a d o k u m e n t u m o k r ó l f o l y t a t o t t m e g be s z é lések i de jén b i z t o s í t j a az e l ő kész í t ő d o k u m e n t u m ok t a r t a l m á h o z v a ló h o z z á f é r és t, k i z á r ó l ag a de l e g á c iók m e g n e v e z és é r e v a ló h i v a t k o z á sok a t távol í t v a e l.
In June 2006, the European Council adopted an overall policy on transparency
Fő t i t k á r s á g a ez z e l pá r h u z a m osan a több e k k ö z öt t a
, the most important elements of which are the opening to the public the Council's deliberations under the co-decision procedure as well as the organisation on the regular basis of public debates on important issues affecting the interests of the Union
T a n á c s á l t a l egy ad o t t hón a p b a n e l f o g a d o t t va l a m e n n y i jog a l k o t á s i akt u s t fe l sor o l ó ha v i ö s s z e f o g l a l ó t k é s z ít. A z ö s s z e f o g l a l ó e m e l l e tt t a r t a l m az z a a s z a v a z a tok e r e d m é n y é r e v o n a t k o z ó in f o r m á c i ó t
In December 2007, the Presidency submitted a report to the Council on the implementation of the overall policy on transparency and assessment of its impact on the effectiveness of the Council's work25.
T a n á c s j egy z ő könyv é be n r ö g z í t e tt, a jog a l k o t á s i akt u s r a v o n a t k o z ó n y i l a t k o z a t o k a t .
Although the issue of public access to the decisionmaking process of the Council is not in itself covered by Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 nor, for that matter, by Article 255 of the EC Treaty, it is useful to sketch the developments in other areas of transparency within the framework of this report.
E u r ó p a i Pa r l a m e n t e l j á r á s i szabá l y z a t a i k b a n k i d o l g o z z á k a d o k u m e n t u m o k h o z v a l ó hozzá f é r és r e v o n a t k o z ó k ü l ö n r e n de l k ez és e k e t. A
See 10633/06, pp. 23 and 24, as well as the Council's annual report on access to documents - 2006, pp. 17-18.
T a n á c s e s e t é ben e k ü l ö n r e n de l k ez és e k e t az e l j á r á s i szabá l y z a t II.
27 number of public deliberations and debates
) be k ez d és é b ő l köve t k ez ő e n továbbá a
Moreover, the new overall policy on transparency had contributed to widening access to Council documents since the documents relating to items discussed in public sessions of the Council are now automatically made public and available in the official languages of
A jog a l k o t á s i fo l y a m a t b a n k ö z v e t l e n ü l é r in t e tt há r o m in t é z m é n y r e a l k a l m az a n d ó ugyanezen e l v e t az
28 the European Union on the Council's Internet website
) bekezdése ha t á r o z z a m e g
See 15828/07, p. 5.
) bekezdésének m e g f e l e l ő e n
COMPLAINTS LODGED WITH THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN AND LEGAL ACTION TAKEN
T a n á c s jog i ak t u s a in a k j egy z é k e ”
Complaint 386/2006/BM, submitted to the Ombudsman on 8 February 2006
A z e l ő z ő éve k h e z ha s o n l ó a n a
Against this background, the Council re-consulted OHIM in order to determine whether the additional information provided to the Ombudsman by the complainant would allow it to provide more information, although this issue strictly speaking went beyond the scope of his complaint.
- be n is szám o s k é p z és t t a r t o t t a d o k u m e n t u m ok e l k é s z í t és é é rt fe l e l ő s t a n á c s i szem é l y z e t részé r e a n n a k é r de k é be n , hogy m e g i s m e r t e s s e v e lük a d o k u m e n t u m o k h o z v a ló nyi l v á n o s h o z z á f é r és t e k i n t e t é be n köve t e n d ő e l j á r á sok a t és g y a k o r l a t o t
LEGAL ACTION
: a szem é l y z e t 5 AD és
Rulings given under the rules on access to documents
„ n y i l v á n o s ság t á j é k o z t a t á s a ” n e v ű rész l e g
Firstly, it contested the Council's decision to refuse access to a note from the Commission to the Council's Article 133 Committee concerning the state of play of the WTO-negotiations on environment and trade, following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancun in September 2003.
); ezen k í v ü l 2007 j ú n i u s á b a n és o k t ó be r é ben k ü l ö n t á j é k o z t a t ó ü l és e k e t ta r t o t t a k az á t l á t ha t ó s á g i osz t á l y szem é l y z e t e
See the Council Annual report on access to documents - 2006, pp. 23-26.
/ a közös k ü l - és b i z t o n s á g p o l i t i k a fő k é p v is e l ő j é n e k
Secondly, the applicant submitted that the Council had infringed upon Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 by failing to apply properly the principle of proportionality in assessing the possibility of partial disclosure.
-i ha t á r o z a t a a n y i l v á n o s s á g f e l é i r á n y u l ó s z a k m a i kapcso l a t t a r t á s t e k in t e t é ben az
Moreover, since the exceptions at issue in the dispute fell under Article 4(1) of Regulation No 1049/2001, the Council was not required in the case at hand to balance the protection of the public interest against the applicant's interest in gaining access to the note, the applicant's claim that its interest in having access to the note should have been balanced against the Council's interest in not disclosing it therefore had to be dismissed.
Fő t i t k á r s á g a á l t a li, a d o k u m e n t u m h o z v a l ó h o z z á f é r és iránt i ké r e l e m t e l j e s v a gy rész l e g e s m e g t a g a d á s e s e tén a k é r e l m ez ő m e g e r ő s í t ő k é r e l m e t n y új t ha t be
As for the applicant's second plea, alleging, in essence, that the Council had failed to properly apply the principle of proportionality in assessing whether partial disclosure of the note was possible, the Court took the view that this possibility had been thoroughly examined by the Council, which had also consulted the
, am e l y be n az in t é z m é n y t á l l á s pont j a f e l ü l v i z s g á l a t á r a k é r h e ti. A m e g e r ő s í t ő k é r e l e m t e l j e s v a gy rész l e g e s m e g t a g a d á s a e s e tén a k é r e l m ez ő p a n a s z t nyúj t ha t be az e u r ó p a i om b u d s m a n h o z és
Commission on this question pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 1049/2001
T a n á c s d o k u m e n t u m a i h o z v a ló h o z z á f é r és r e v o n a t k o z ó s t a t is z t i k á t ta r t a l m az
It could therefore not be concluded that the Council, in claiming that no minutes existed on the agenda item concerned, infringed the applicant's right to access to documents conferred by Regulation No 1049/2001.
- v a gy m e g e r ő s í t ő k é r e l m e t köve t ő e n ) n y i l v á n o s s á t e tt dokum e n t u m ok szám a
Moreover, even if the applicant's request had included a request for access to internal records drawn up by the Commission and Member States' delegations, the Council could not communicate those records pursuant to Article 2(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, since they were neither held nor received by the Council.
- n y i l v á n t a r t á s á n a k az in t e r n e ten k e r e s z t ü l i leké r de z és é r e v o n a t k o z ó s t a t is z t i k á k is b i z o n y í t j á kfi, , az in t e r n e ten e l é r h e t ő n y i l v á n t a r t á s t o v á b b r a is f o n t o s k e r e s és i eszköz t je l e n t azon p o l g á rok szám á r a
The request for access was submitted and subsequently examined under the provisions of Decision 93/731/EC, OJ 1993 L 340, 31.12.1993, p. 43.
A z a l a p k é r e l m ek fő k é n t d i á k o k t ó l és k u t a t ó k t ó l é r k e z tek
For further details on the initial stages of the proceedings, see also the Council's annual report on access to documents - 2003, pp. 34-35 as well as the annual report for the year 2004, pp. 28-29.
, az i p a ri és a k e r e s k e de l m i ága z a t, va l a m in t a l o b b i c s o p o r tok
In its decision of 30 July 1999 the Council had stated that the requested document had been drawn up by the Central Banks Governors and therefore invited the applicant to send his request directly to the author of the document in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(2) of Decision 93/731/EC on public access to documents34.
) s z in t én a l e g e r ő t e l j e s e b be n ké p v i s e lt t á r s ad a l m i és s z a k m a i csopor tok k ö z é t a r t o z n a kfi. .
The applicant, however, claimed that the Council had infringed the "basic Community law principle which provides for public access to documents" as well as Article 1 of Decision 93/731/EC and
M i v e l a k é r e l m ez ő k n e k nem k e ll m e g a d n i uk sem szem é l y a z o n o s s á g u k a t, sem
Article 253 of the EC Treaty (failure to state the reasons).
) s z in t én d i á k o k t ó l és k u t a t ó k t ó l s z á r m az o t t.
This provision, containing the so-called "originator rule", read as follows: "Where the requested document was written by a natural or legal person, a Member State, another Community institution or body, or any other national or international body, the application must not be sent to the Council, but direct to the author."
- n y i l v á n t a r t á s a i a s a jtó szám á r a r e n de l k e z és r e á lló l e h e t s é g e s for r á sok n a k csak egy i k é t ké p v i s e l i kfi. .
The originator rule was abolished with the entry into force of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 on 3 December 2001, save for third party documents which, although held by the institutions, had been established prior to that date.
E z e n k í v ü l az új s á g í rók több s é g é t e l s ő sor b a n a l e g f rissebb h í rek é r de k l i kfi. .
For further information on that issue, see Report from the Commission on the implementation of the principles in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, COM(2004) 45 final, pp. 7-8 and p. 14.
, hogy az új s á g í r ó k t ó l be é r k e z e tt néhá ny h o z z á f é r és i k é r e l e m e l s ő sor b a n a t é n y f e l t á ró új s á g í r á s t e r ü l e t é h e z k a p c s o l ó d o t t, és ily m ódon ha s o n l í t o t t az egy e t e m i / fő is k o l a i okt a tók á l t a l be n y új t o tt ké r e l m e k h e z
Page 29
) és az
That said, despite the increasingly complex nature of the dossiers to be examined, the General Secretariat of the Council is coping with the ensuing administrative burden, while meeting the time-limits laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
- és m e g e r ő s í t ő k é r e l m ek v i s z o n y l ag m a g a s szám a az z a l a t é n n y e l m a g y a r á z ha t ó , hogy szám o s m u l t in a c i o n á l is v á l l a l a t és nem z e t k ö z i ügyvé d i i r o d a
In this regard, the contribution made by the Working Party on Information to the processing of confirmatory applications must be noted.
, va l a m in t n a g y s z á m ú , k ü l ö n b ö z ő g a z d a s á g i és i p a ri ága z a t o t e u r ó p a i sz in t en ké p v i s e l ő t á rsaság s z é k h e l y e
The rate of access to Council documents in 2007 fell in comparison to 2006 (78,9 % in 2007 as against 87,7 % in 2006).
A h o z z á f é r és i kére l m e k t á r g y a i t képező t e r ü l e t e k
However, this must be seen in the light of the above-mentioned fact that a very considerable number of documents were made directly accessible to the public via the register as soon as they were circulated.
A h o z z á f é r és i ké r e l m ek t á r g y á t ké p e z ő t e r ü l e t e t ille tően a be l - és i g a zságügy t e r ü l e t e iránt f i g y e l h e t ő
Documents released by the General Secretariat of the Council at the initial stage 2003 2004 2005 2006
- k a l szem be n ) iránt i é r de k l ő d é s e v i s z o n y l a g o s a n á llandó m a r ad t
Based on 7.775 documents considered.
- ben a l e g több m e g e r ő s í t ő k é r e l e m az
Professional profile of the applicants (initial applications)
E z a szám f o l y a m a t o s a n n ő tt az e l m ú lt há r o m évben
Environmental Lobbies
-a i r á n y u lt a be l - és igazságügy r e
Other groups of interests
( t e l j e s egészében vagy részben
Members of the European Parliament and their assistants
- b a n ez z e l indok o l ták a m e g t a g a d á sok
Professional profile of the applicants (confirmatory applications)
, ugyanakko r v é d i k a jog i vé l e m é n y e k b i z a l m a s j e l l e g é t.
Civil society
T a n á c s ügyben
Industrial/Commercial Sector
. és az t köve t ő p o n t j a it (az
Public authorities (non-EU institutions, third-country representatives, etc.)
B i z o t t s á g d o k u m e n t u m a i h o z v a l ó n y i l v á n o s hozzá f é r és r ő l szó l ó
Members of the European Parliament and their assistants
L e g u t ó b b i p o l i t i k a i sz in t ű ü l és é n , a m e l y r e
Undeclared professional origin
. c i k k e nem s z a b á l y o z z a
United Kingdom
., az o m b u d s m a n h o z
Finland Sweden United Kingdom
, hogy e rész l e g e s közzé t é t e l az
Energy
, hogy a
Health and Consumer Protection
A m in t az t m á r e j e l e n t és e l s ő része is t a r t a l m az t a
Tax Questions – Fiscal Issues
- be n be n y új t o t t ké r e l m ek több m in t
Regional Policy and Economical/Social Cohesion
A nyilvános dokumentum-nyilvántartásban szereplő, valamint a nyilvános / letölthető dokumentumok száma
Justice and Home Affairs
Egyéb érdekcsoportok
Legal questions
Civil társadalom
Functioning of the institutions
Egyetemi kutatás
Financing of the Union (Budget, Statute)
Tudományos világ
Transparency
Könyvtár
Reasons for refusal of access (replies provided by the General Secretariat of the Council at the initial stage)
A kérelmezők szakmai háttere (megerősítő kérelmek)
Protection of public interest as regards defence and military matters
Az Európai Parlament képviselői és asszisztenseik
Protection of public interest as regards international relations
A kérelmezők földrajzi eloszlása (alapkérelmek)