natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
`Reforming the Commission', White Paper, Part I, point V3, and Part II, point XXX, COM(2000) 200 final.Commission communication concerning the fraud-proofing of legislation and contract management, of 7.11.2001, SEC(2001) 2029 final.
A Bizottsâg reformjâról szóló fehêr kõnyv I. rêsze V3. pontja ês II. rêsze XXX. pontja, COM(2000) 200 vêgleges.A jogszabâlyok ês a szerz┸dêskezelês csalâsbiztonsâgâról szóló, 2001. november 7-i bizottsâgi kõzlemêny, SEC(2001) 2029 vêgleges.
COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE AND CUSTOMS MATTERS
MEZ─GAZDASÂGI ÊS VÂMÜGYI TERÜLETEKEN VALÓ EGYÜTTM┍KÕDÊS
The instrument for cooperation in agricultural and customs matters (43) lays down the conditions under which the customs and agricultural authorities of the Member States cooperate with one another and also with the Commission at the request of an applicant authority or spontaneously, to ensure, notably, the exercise of a special surveillance on persons, places, movements of goods and means of transportation, administrative inquir-ies, the providing of a document, etc.
A mez┸gazdasâgi ês vâmügyi területeken az együttm╆kõdês eszkõze43 hatârozza meg azo-kat a feltêteleket, amelyek mellett a vâm- ês mez┸gazdasâgi hatósâgok egymâssal ês a Bi-zottsâggal « megkeres┸ hatósâg kêrêsêre vagy õnkêntes alapon « együttm╆kõdnek annak êrdekêben, hogy biztosîtsâk a speciâlis felügyeletet a szemêlyek, a helyek, az âruk mozgâsa ês a szâllîtóeszkõzõk, a kõzigazgatâsi vizsgâlatok ês a tanúsîtvânyok kiâllîtâsa tekintetêben.
The regulation also makes provisions for mutual assistance with the authorities in third countries and the information from the Commission when this presents a particular interest (Articles 19 to 22).
A rendelet tovâbbâ el┸îrja a harmadik orszâgokkal való kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâst ês a Bizottsâg êrtesîtêsêt, amennyiben külõnõsen fontos êrdek âll fenn (19«22. cikk).
The regulation established a customs information system (Articles 23 to 41) that enables information to be disseminated rapidly and makes the cooperation procedures more effi-cient (44).
A rendelet lêtrehozott egy vâminformâciós rendszert (23«41. cikk), amely lehet┸vê teszi az informâciók gyors terjesztêsêt, ês hatêkonyabbâ teszi az együttm╆kõdêsi eljârâsokat44.
This year this subject was chosen by the Commission and the Member States as one of the central questions covered in the questionnaire.
A Bizottsâg ês a tagâllamok ez êvben e kêrdêst a kêrd┸îv kõzponti têmâjâvâ vâlasztottâk.
The following section gives an overview on the state of play in this area.
Az alâbbi szakasz âttekintêst nyújt e terület helyzetêr┸l.
Results of analysis of the contributions from the Member States (
Âltalânossâgban elmondható, hogy a rendelet vêgrehajtâsa kielêgît┸ módon tõrtênik.
While in general the implementation of the regulation is satisfactory, analyses shows that the quality of both Member State and Commission statistical data could be improved and that certain practical problems should be resolved.
Az elemzêsb┸l az derül ki, hogy a tagâllamok ês a Bizottsâg szintjên rendelkezêsre âlló statisztikai adatok min┸sêgên mêg lehet javîtani, ês megoldâst kellene talâlni nêhâny gyakorlati problêmâra.
Statistics on communications.
A kõzlemênyeket illet┸ statisztikai adatok.
Most Member States have encountered difficulties in sup-plying reliable and coherent statistics concerning the communications or reports request-ed.
A legtõbb tagâllam nehêzsêgekkel talâlta szembe magât a kõzlemênyeket vagy jelentêseket illet┸, megbîzható ês koherens statisztikai adatok õsszeâllîtâsa sorân.
The Member States have neither a centralised database for this type of information nor a uniform definition of the concept of `mutual assistance communication'.
A tagâllamok az ilyenfajta informâcióhoz nem rendelkeznek sem kõzponti adatbâzissal, sem pedig a ‡kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâsi kõzlemêny· kifejezês egysêges meghatârozâsâval.
No analysis was therefore possible and examination of the figures was based merely on a quantitative ap-proach.
Îgy csak az adatok mennyisêgi vizsgâlata volt elvêgezhet┸, elemzêsre nem volt lehet┸sêg.
Also, there are no exploitable statistics on the number of communications and reports requested by or communicated to the Commission.
Hasonlókêppen a Bizottsâg âltal igênyelt vagy a Bizottsâggal kõzõlt kõzlemênyek ês jelentêsek szâmâra vonatkozóan sem lêteznek hasznosîtható statisztikai adatok.
Improvement of the databases is desirable for use in risk analysis.
Az adatbâzisok javîtâsa ajânlatos annak êrdekêben, hogy hasznâlhatók legye-nek a kockâzatelemzêshez.
Handling of request for mutual assistance.
A kõlcsõnõs jogsegêly irânti kêrelem kezelêse.
Member States have reported problems, in particular response time, the quality and relevance of responses (or even the absence of any response, particularly from certain third countries) and translation problems.
A tagâllamok külõnbõz┸ problêmâkat je-lentettek, külõnõsen a vâlaszadâsi hatârid┸ket, a vâlaszok min┸sêgêt ês helytâllósâgât (s┸t a vâlasz hiânyât, f┸kênt egyes harmadik orszâgok rêszêr┸l), tovâbbâ fordîtâsi problêmâkat.
As a result, the time limit for instituting the proceedings in question sometimes expires.
Aminek nêha az az eredmênye, hogy elêvülnek a megindîtott intêzkedêsek.
Most of the Member States regularly use reminders to speed up the procedure.
A legtõbb tag-âllam az eljârâs felgyorsîtâsa êrdekêben rendszeresen fordul ahhoz a megoldâshoz, hogy felszólîtâst küld.
Regulation (EC) No 515/97, OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, supplemented by Commission Regulation (EC) No 696/98: OJ L 96, 28.3.1998, p.
A 696/98/EK bizottsâgi rendelettel (HL L 96., 1998.3.28.) kiegêszîtett 515/97/EK rendelet (HL L 82., 1997.3.22.).A harmadik pillêr egyik eszkõze kiegêszîti e rendszert: a kõzõssêgi ês nemzeti vâmjogszabâlyok ellen elkõvetett b╆ncse-lekmênyeket illet┸en a b╆ntet┸nyomozâs keretêben a kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâsi mechanizmusokat meghatârozó ‡II.
A certain number of the investigations concerned are the natural extension of administra-tive inquiries initiated under Regulation (EC) No 515/97.
Bizonyos êrintett vizsgâlatok az 515/97/EK rendelet êrtelmêben vêgzett kõzigazgatâsi vizsgâlatok termêszetes folytatâsât kêpezik.
In 2004, 10 Member States (Belgium, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland,) ratified the Naples II Convention.
2004-ben tîz tagâllam ratifikâlta a fenti egyezmênyt (Ausztria, Belgium, Ciprus, Ma-gyarorszâg, Litvânia, Lettorszâg, Portugâlia, Finnorszâg, Szlovênia ês Szlovâkia).
A further two (Czech Republic, Estonia) ratified it at the beginning of 2005.
2005 elejên tovâbbi kêt orszâg (a Cseh Kõztârsasâg ês Êsztorszâg) ratifikâlta.
At the time this report was drafted, only three Member States had not yet deposited their instrument of ratification.All the answers by Member States can be consulted in the working document (SEC(2005) 973) relating to the report, since the report gives only a very summarised overview.
E jelentês elkêszîtêsekor mâr csak hârom tagâllam nem helyezte letêtbe a meger┸-sît┸ okiratot.A tagâllamok vâlaszainak teljes szõvege a jelentêshez kapcsolódó munkadokumentumban (SEC(2005) 973) êrhet┸ el, a jelentês kifejezetten csak õsszefoglaló jelleg╆ âttekintêst ad.
Cooperation with third countries.
2 2 âllapodâsok kõtêsêt javasoltâk46.
Member States have suggested concluding cooperation agreements with third countries to resolve some of the problems reported (46). Although the Commission updates and distributes the contact list during each mutual assistance committee meeting (two or three times a year), it has been reported that sometimes it is difficult to determine the competent authority in a third country in a Member State (when a request is sent by a third country).
Annak ellenêre, hogy a Bizottsâg a kapcsolattartók listâjât frissîti ês a kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâsi bizottsâg (êvente kêt vagy hârom alkalommal meg-rendezêsre kerül┸) gy╆lêsein kiosztja, jelentês kêszül arról, hogy nêha nehêz meghatârozni egy harmadik orszâg vagy tagâllam hatâskõrrel rendelkez┸ hatósâgât (amennyiben a kêrel-met harmadik orszâg nyújtotta be).
Handling of fraud risk messages.
A csalâs veszêlyêr┸l szóló kõzlemênyek kezelêse.
Member States are required (47) to inform the Commission of risks of fraud or other irregularities that are of particular relevance at Community level, and the Commission conveys this information to other Member States.
A tagâllamok êrtesîtik a Bizottsâgot a feltêtelezett csalâsokról vagy egyêb szabâlytalansâgokról, amennyiben azok külõnõsen fon-tos kõzõssêgi szint╆ êrdeket sêrtenek, ês a Bizottsâg âtadja ezen informâciókat a tõbbi êrin-tett tagâllamnak47.
In some Member States, there are two or more competent administrations for the application of customs legislation; messages are then handled in the same way as other requests for mu-tual assistance; a central coordinating unit or office generally receives the message and conducts an initial analysis of it in order to determine which competent authority should deal with it (48).
Egyes tagâllamokban a vâmjogszabâlyok alkalmazâsâêrt kêt vagy tõbb hatósâg felel┸s, azonban ezen kõzlemênyek kezelêse a kõlcsõnõs jogsegêly irânti kêrelmek kezelêsêvel hasonló módon tõrtênik: a kõzlemêny rendszerint egy koordinâciós egysêghez vagy koordinâciós kõzponti irodâhoz êrkezik be, ahol az ügyet kezel┸ illetêkes hatósâg meghatârozâsa êrdekêben els┸dleges elemzêst hajtanak vêgre48.
The results are conveyed to the Commission (OLAF) by the coordinating unit/office.
A koordinâciós egysêg/iro-da tovâbbîtja az esetleges eredmênyeket a Bizottsâgnak (OLAF).
Necessity of a judicial authorisation.
Igazsâgügyi hatósâgi engedêly szüksêgessêge.
Where the consent of the judicial authority is re-quired to implement a measure needed to handle a request for mutual assistance, the in-formation thus obtained is conveyed to the requesting Member State (49).
Amennyiben a kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâs irânti kêrelem kezelêsêhez szüksêges intêzkedês vêgrehajtâsâhoz az igazsâgügyi hatósâg en-gedêlyêre van szüksêg, az îgy kapott informâciót âtadjâk a kêrelmez┸ tagâllamnak49.
An additional judicial authorisation may be necessary for the transmission of information.
Az informâció tovâbbîtâsâhoz esetlegesen kiegêszît┸ igazsâgügyi hatósâgi engedêly szüksêges.
Member States differ widely as to which types of investigative measures require authorisation from the judicial authority; in particular, the customs authorities have more extensive powers of administrative inquiry.
A tagâllamokban nagy eltêrês mutatkozik az igazsâgügyi hatósâgi engedêlyt igênyl┸ vizsgâ-latok tîpusât illet┸en, külõnõsen a vâmhivatalok kõzigazgatâsi vizsgâlati hatâskõrêt tekint-ve.
Generally speaking, however, each time such an authorisation is required to take an investigative measure, it is also required in order to send the report to the requesting Member State (50).
Âltalânossâgban elmondható, hogy amennyiben a vizsgâlat vêgrehajtâsâhoz engedêly kell, az esetben a jelentêst kêrelmez┸ tagâllamnak tõrtên┸ tovâbbîtâsâhoz is engedêlyre van szüksêg50.
Certain Member States also impose additional require-ments, not laid down in the regulation, for transmitting the data obtained.
Egyes tagâllamok a kapott adatok tovâbbîtâsâhoz « a rendeletben el┸ nem îrt « kiegêszît┸ feltêteleket szabnak meg.
Treatment of reports submitted following a mission in a third country.
Harmadik orszâgban való kiküldetêst kõvet┸en benyújtott jelentêsek kezelêse.
Following a Community mission in a third country, a report, countersigned by those taking part in the mission, and the supporting documentation which could be used as evidence, are sent to the Member States concerned even if they have not taken part in the mission (51).
Harma-dik orszâgban tõltõtt kiküldetês vêgên a rêsztvev┸k âltal jóvâhagyott jelentêst, valamint a bizonyîtêkkênt felhasznâlható iratokat tovâbbîtjâk az êrintett tagâllamoknak, mêg az eset-ben is, ha azok nem vettek rêszt a kiküldetêsben51.
The Commission wished to know if the reports and documentation could be used as evidence in a recovery procedure before a national court, whether the Member State took part in the mission or not.
A Bizottsâg tudni kîvânta, hogy a tovâb-bîtott jelentêsek ês iratok behajtâsi eljârâs sorân nemzeti bîrósâg el┸tt bizonyîtêkkênt hasz-nâlhatók-e függetlenül attól, hogy a tagâllam rêszt vett vagy nem a kiküldetêsben.
The Member States replied in the affirmative.
A tagâllamok igenl┸ vâlaszt adtak e kêrdêsre.
However, there may be dif-ficulties with the evidence in a recovery procedure in a Member State that has not taken part in the mission in cases where the third country has not signed the report, something which is not required by the Community regulation.
A harmadik orszâgok hatósâgai azonban nem îrtâk alâ e jelentêst (a kõzõssêgi jogszabâlyok nem kõvetelik meg e hatósâgok alâîrâsât), ami a bizonyîtêkot illet┸en nehêzsêgekkel jârhat a kiküldetêsben rêszt nem vev┸ tagâllam-ban kezdemênyezett eljârâs folyamân.
Statistics on follow-up of cases reported.
Statisztikai adatok a jelentett esetek nyomon kõvetêsêr┸l.
Communication of the administrative and judi-cial decisions on reported cases is obligatory (52).
A rendelet êrtelmêben a jelen-tett eseteket illet┸en kõtelez┸ az igazgatâsi vagy büntet┸jogi hatârozatok kõzlêse52.
Although several Member States plan to
Habâr tõbb tagâllam azt tervezi, hogy a kõzõlt esetek nyomon kõvetêsêêrt ês a statisztikai adatok
It has been suggested that agreements be concluded with the following countries: Albania, Armenia, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, China, Croatia, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Panama, Romania, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, the countries of the Middle East, the Balkan countries, the north African countries and the countries of south-east Asia.
Megâllapodâsok kõtêse az alâbbi orszâgokkal javasolt: Albânia, Õrmênyorszâg, Fehêroroszorszâg, Bosznia ês Hercego-vina, Kanada, Kîna, Horvâtorszâg, Egyesült Arab Emîrsêgek, Indonêzia, Japân, Laosz, Malajzia, Panama, România, Oroszorszâg, Szerbia ês Montenegró, Szingapúr, Tajvan, Thaifõld, Tunêzia, Vietnâm, ‡kõzel-keleti orszâgok·, ‡balkâni orszâgok·, ‡êszak-afrikai orszâgok·, ‡dêlkelet-âzsiai orszâgok·.
The cooperation agreements signed with India (20.10.2004) and Mexico (26.3.2001) came into force.Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 515/97.In Poland, the Bureau for International Treasury Relations is the main correspondent of the Commission, but the customs authorities must also be contacted in a certain number of cases.
Az Indiâval 2004. október 20-ân ês Mexikóval 2001. mârcius 26-ân alâîrt együttm╆kõdêsi megâllapodâsok hatâlyba lêptek.Az 515/97/EK rendelet 18. cikke.Lengyelorszâgban a Bizottsâg f┸ târgyalópartnere az âllamkincstâr nemzetkõzi kapcsolatokêrt felel┸s irodâja, azonban bizonyos esetekben a vâmhatósâgokkal is fel kell venni a kapcsolatot.
Both services are departments of the Ministry of Finance.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 515/95.With the exception of France, Poland and Slovakia concerning customs investigations.Article 20 of the regulation.Article 49 of the regulation, generally made through the OWNRES system.
Mindkêt szolgâlat a pênzügyminisztêrium szerve-zeti egysêge.Az 515/97/EK rendelet 3. cikke.A vâmügyi vizsgâlatok tekintetêben Lengyelorszâg, Szlovâkia ês Franciaorszâg kivêtelêvel.A rendelet 20. cikke.49. cikk, rendszerint az OWNERS-rendszeren keresztül.
2 3 set up departments responsible for following up cases reported and drawing up statistics, there is no centralised management of this information at present and the statistics cur-rently obtained are incomplete and unreliable.
2 3 kidolgozâsâêrt felel┸s szervezeti egysêgeket hoz lêtre, a legtõbb tagâllam jelenleg nem kõz-pontosîtja ezen informâciót, îgy az elkêszîtett statisztikai adatok hiânyosak, ês nem igazân megbîzhatók.
Only a few decisions concern organised crime.
A szervezett b╆nõzêst illet┸ hatârozatok arânya nagyon alacsony.
The reason for this may be the scant incidence of organised crime in customs and agricultural infringements, the restricted definition of organised crime in the legislation of certain Member States, reclassification by the judicial authority of the offences reported (for example, conspiracy), or also a lack of evidence in the case file.
Ez azzal magyarâzható, hogy viszonylag alacsony a szervezett b╆nõzês rêszarânya a vâmügyi ês me-z┸gazdasâgi b╆ncselekmênyekben, tovâbbâ, hogy egyes tagâllamok jogrendszere nagyon sz╆k êrtelemben hatârozza meg a szervezett b╆nõzêst, ezenkîvül, hogy az igazsâgügyi szerv újraosztâlyozza a megâllapîtott b╆ncselekmênyeket (pl. b╆nszõvetsêggê), vagy hogy az ügy-ben nem âll rendelkezêsre elegend┸ bizonyîtêk.
Measures taken by the Commission in 2004
A Bizottsâg âltal 2004-ben hozott intêzkedêsek
Stepping up cooperation in agricultural and customs matters.
Mez┸gazdasâgi ês vâmügyi területeken való együttm╆kõdês javîtâsa.
Following the thematic report of the Budget DG on the handling of mutual assistance messages (53), the Commis- sion consulted the Member States and confirmed the need to:
A kõlcsõnõs segît-sêgnyújtâst illet┸ kõzlemênyek kezelêsêr┸l szóló kõltsêgvetêsi f┸igazgatósâgi tematikus jelentêst53 kõvet┸en a Bizottsâg konzultâciót folytatott a tagâllamokkal. Az alâbbi szüksêg- letek igazolódtak be:
̋ reinforce the efficiency of working methods by faster and more modern exchange and follow-up of information;
« a munkamódszerek hatêkonysâgât modernebb ês gyorsabb informâciócserêvel ês infor-mâciós nyomon kõvetêssel kell meger┸sîteni,
̋ foster a better cooperative environment between the tools of detection, investigation and prosecution (articulation between mutual assistance sheets, CIS (54) and
54 ês a vâmügyi nyilvântartâs-azonosîtó adatbâzis (FIDE)
̋ better synergy between the respective aims of various Commission departments.
« jobb koordinâlâsra van szüksêg a Bizottsâg külõnbõz┸ szolgâlatai âltal kit╆zõtt cêlkit╆-zêsek kõzõtt.
In 2004, a feasibility study was conducted with a view to creating an electronic message: `Mutual assistance/fraud communication'.
2004-ben megvalósîthatósâgi tanulmânyt indîtottak be a ‡kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâs/csalâs kõzlêse· elektronikus kõzlemêny lêtrehozâsânak el┸kêszîtêsêhez.
Extension of cooperation to other areas.
Az együttm╆kõdês egyêb területekre való kiterjesztêse.
On 20 July 2004, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Parliament and Council regulation on mutual administrative assist-ance (56).
A Bizottsâg 2004. július 20-ân rendelettervezetet nyújtott be az Európai Parlamentnek ês a Tanâcsnak a kõlcsõnõs kõz-igazgatâsi segîtsêgnyújtâs vonatkozâsâban56.
The proposed regulation could provide a more detailed legislative framework in the fight against fraud and encourages cooperation with and coordination by the Commission, par-ticularly OLAF.
A javasolt rendelet âtfogóbb jogalapot biztosîtana a csalâs elleni küzdelemben ês el┸segîtenê a Bizottsâggal, külõnõsen az OLAF-fal való kõzõssêgi szint╆ együttm╆kõdêst ês koordinâciót.
The proposal is horizontal: it covers all the areas involved in the fight against Community fraud not yet addressed by sectoral legislation, in particular the cooperation between Member States and the Commission in the fight against intra-Community VAT fraud (57), the Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
A rendeletjavaslat horizontâlis jelleg╆, a kõzõssêgi szint╆ csalâs elleni küzdelem minden olyan âgazatâra kiterjed, amelyeket âgazatilag mêg nem szabâlyoznak, külõnõsen a HÊA-ra57, struk-turâlis alapokra ês kõzvetlen kiadâsokra vonatkozó kõzõssêgen belüli csalâs elleni küzdelemben a tagâllamok ês a Bizottsâg kõzõtti együttm╆kõdêsre.
It also concerns the use of information on financial transactions suspected of involving laundering of proceeds from Community fraud.
A rendeletjavaslat egyarânt vonatkozik a kõzõssêgi szint╆ csalâsból szârmazó pênzek mosâsânak feltêtelezett pênzügyi tranzakcióit illet┸ informâciók felhasznâlâsâra.
Cooperation should be used above all for cases of particular impor-tance for the Community, i.e. tax losses of at least EUR 500 000 in cases of VAT fraud or of EUR 100 000 in other cases.
Az együttm╆kõdêsnek a kõzõssêgi szinten külõnõs jelent┸sêg╆ ügyekre kellene õsszpontosîtania, vagyis olyan esetekre, ahol az adóvesztesêg HÊA-csalâs esetên legalâbb 500 000 EUR ês egyêb esetekben 100 000 EUR.
Thematic report of 2002 on the handling of mutual assistance messages in the Member States.Database `Customs information system', foreseen by the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the Use of Information Tech-nology for Customs Purposes (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995).
A kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâst illet┸ kõzlemênyek tagâllamokon belül tõrtên┸ kezelêsêr┸l szóló, 2002. êvi tematikus jelen-tês.Az informâciótechnológia vâmügyi cêlokra tõrtên┸ felhasznâlâsâról szóló, 1995. július 26-i egyezmêny (HL C 316., 1995.11.27.) âltal tervezett ‡vâminformâciós rendszer· adatbâzisa.
A new common interface should allow the storage of a certain amount of information from the mutual assistance messages.The creation of a customs files identification database (FIDE) foreseen by the additional protocol to the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes of 8 May 2003 (OJ C 139, 13.6.2003).
Egy új kõzõs felületnek kõszõnhet┸en lehet┸vê vâlna, hogy ebben târoljâk a kõlcsõnõs segîtsêgnyújtâst illet┸ kõzlemênyekben talâlható bizonyos informâciókat.Az informâciótechnológia vâmügyi cêlokra tõrtên┸ felhasznâlâsâról szóló egyezmêny 2003. mâjus 8-i kiegêszît┸ jegyz┸-kõnyve (HL C 139., 2003.6.13.) el┸îrja a vâmügyi nyilvântartâs-azonosîtó adatbâzis (FIDE) lêtrehozâsât.
Its objective is to allow the competent authorities of a Member State to identify the competent authorities of the other Member States who investigated the same persons or companies.COM(2004) 509 final.The aim of the proposed regulation is to supplement Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 of 7.10.2003, OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, which concerns only cooperation between Member States, and not between Member States and the Com-mission.
A FIDE cêlki-t╆zêse az, hogy lehet┸vê tegye egy tagâllam illetêkes hatósâgai szâmâra a tõbbi tagâllam azon illetêkes hatósâgainak beazonosîtâsât, amelyek ugyanazon szemêlyeket vagy vâllalkozâsokat illet┸en vizsgâlatot folytatnak vagy folytattak.COM(2004) 509 vêgleges.A javasolt rendelet a 2003. október 7-i 1798/2003/EK tanâcsi rendelet (HL L 264., 2003.10.15.) kiegêszîtêsêre irânyul, amely csak a tagâllamok kõzõtti, ês nem a tagâllamok, illetve a Bizottsâg kõzõtti együttm╆kõdêsre vonatkozik.
The Commission supervises the recovery of amounts unduly paid by the Communities as the result of an error, fraud or another irregularity, and the collection of own resources.
A Bizottsâg ügyel a Kõzõssêgek âltal hiba, csalâs vagy egyêb szabâlytalansâg rêvên jogalap nêlkül kifizetett õsszegek behajtâsâra, valamint a sajât forrâsok beszedêsêre.
In the areas directly managed by it, the Commission itself is responsible for recovery.
A kõzvetlenül âltala kezelt területeken a behajtâs is a Bizottsâg sajât hatâskõre alâ tartozik.
In areas in which management has been decentralised, this responsibility is shared, with the Commission following the recovery procedures initiated by the Member States or else applying the clearance procedures.
A decentrali-zâlt igazgatâs területên megosztott a hatâskõr, a Bizottsâg kõveti a tagâllamok âltal kezde-mênyezett behajtâsi eljârâsokat, ês adott esetben alkalmazza az elszâmolâsi eljârâsokat.
In 2004, the Commission took several measures aimed at improving recovery of own resources, agricultural funds, Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
A Bizottsâg 2004-ben tõbb intêzkedêst is hozott a sajât forrâsok, a mez┸gazdasâgi ês struk-turâlis alapok, tovâbbâ a kõzvetlen kiadâsok behajtâsânak javîtâsa êrdekêben.
Member States are responsible for the recovery of traditional own resources. The Member States must keep `A accounts' (58) for the registration of paid and/or guaranteed customs debts, and `B accounts' for the registration of either unpaid or not guaranteed debts (or debts guaranteed but contested).
A hagyomânyos sajât forrâsok behajtâsâêrt a tagâllamok felel┸sek. ‡A szâmlâkat·58 kell ve-zetniük a kifizetett ês/vagy garantâlt vâmtartozâsok nyilvântartâsâról, valamint ‡B szâmlâ-kat· a ki nem fizetett ês nem garantâlt (vagy garantâlt, de vitatott) tartozâsok nyilvântartâ-sâról.