natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2000 the European Union launched the Lisbon Strategy › an ambitious agenda for reform whose aim was to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based econo-my in the world by 2010.
Az elmÿlt hÿsz ïv sorèn az irènyelv tèrgyi hatèlya fokozatosan b ﾒ v Ÿ l t , ïs ma mèr minden ipari, mezﾒgazdasègi ïs halèszati termïkre kiterjed.
At its half-way mark, in 2005, the Com-mission proposed a renewed approach to this strategy focus-ing on growth and jobs. The Commission identi«edimprovingthe quality of European and national regulation to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market as a key challenge in this respect.
A 98/48/EK irènyelv az informèciùs tèrsada-lom szolgèltatèsait is magèban foglalja, mivel ïrezhetﾒen megnﾒtt az igïny egy olyan mechanizmus irènt, amely ellen-ﾒrzïst biztosót e gyorsan fejlﾒdﾒ ÿj t e r Ÿ l e t felett, ugyanakkor meghagyja ÿgy a gazdasègi szereplﾒk, mint a tagèllamok le-hetﾒ legnagyobb fokÿ szabadsègèt ahhoz, hogy megelﾒzhes-sïk a m｀szaki fejlﾒdïst gètlù tïnyezﾒk lïtrejûttït ebben a szektorban.
One of the most di/cultandimportanttasksinthemanage-ment of the internal market is preventing the adoption of na-tional technical regulations and standards which create new barriers to trade.
A belsﾒ piac irènyótèsèval û s s z e f Ÿ g g ï sb e n az egyik legnehe-zebb ïs legfontosabb feladat az olyan nemzeti m｀szaki szabè-lyok ïs szabvènyok elfogadèsènak megelﾒzïse, amelyek csak ÿjabb akadèlyokat gûrdótenïnek a kereskedelem elï.
Twenty years after its entry into force the N o - t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e ( D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C , c o d i « e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C ) has proved to be a fundamental internal market in-strument.
Hÿsz ïv-vel hatèlybalïpïse utèn a tèjïkoztatèsi eljèrès megèllapótèsèrùl szùlù irènyelv (a 98/34/EK irènyelvvel kodi«kèlt83/189/EGKirènyelv) a belsﾒ piac egyik alapvetﾒ jelentﾒsïg｀ eszkûzïnek bizonyult.
This procedure contributes to the application of the subsidi-arity principle, both through enabling improvements to be made to national legislation and identifying areas where har-monisation is really necessary.
Ez az eljèrès egyrïszt ÿgy segóti elﾒ a szubszidiaritès elvïnek ï r v ï n y e s Ÿ l ï s ït , hogy lehetﾒsïget teremt a nemzeti jogalko-tès tûkïletesótïsïre, mèsrïszt ÿgy, hogy meghatèrozza azo-kat a t e r Ÿ l e t e k e t , ahol valùban s z Ÿ k s ï g van jogharmonizèci-ùra.
Thus, the decision-making proc-ess can take place at the most appropriate level enabling de-centralisation which safeguards the diversity of political, cultural and regional traditions.
Ógy a dûntïshozatali eljèrèsra a legmegfelelﾒbb szinten k e r Ÿ l sor, ami teret ad a decentralizèciùnak, ezèltal fenntart-ja a politikai, kulturèlis ïs regionèlis tradóciùk sokszón｀sïgït.
The Directive has provided an insight into national regulatory initiatives, has led to the crea-tion of a genuine discussion forum, clearing the way for joint action to strengthen the internal market and has recently con-tributed to the establishment of the enlarged internal market of 25 Member States.
Az irènyelv betekintïst enged a nemzeti szabèlyozèsi kezde-mïnyezïsekbe, valùdi vitafùrum lïtrejûttïhez vezet, ïs ez-zel megnyitja az utat a belsﾒ piac megerﾒsótïsït cïlzù effg y Ÿ t - t e s fellïpïs elﾒtt; az utùbbi idﾒben pedig hozzèjèrult a 25 tagÿra b ﾒ v Ÿ l t belsﾒ piac megteremtïsïhez.
The mechanism set up by the original Directive 83/189/EEC is based on the agreement of the Member States to inform and consult each other and the Commission before they adopt technical regulations and to modify their drafts if necessary.
Az eredetileg a 83/189/EGK irènyelvvel lïtrehozott mechaniz-mus alapjèt a tagèllamoknak az a megèllapodèsa kïpezte, amelynek ïrtelmïben mïg az ÿjabb m｀szaki szabèlyok elfo-gadèsa elﾒtt tèjïkoztatjèk egymèst ïs a Bizottsègot, illetve konzultèlnak egymèssal ïs a Bizottsèggal, tovèbbè, ha kell, mùdosótjèk e szabèlyok tervezetït.
By means of transparency and the exchange of information at the legislative proposal stage, the Member States have agreed to prevent the emergence of new obstacles to the single market.
A tagèllamok megèllapod-tak arrùl, hogy a tûrvïnyalkotès javaslattïteli szakaszèban biztosótott ètlèthatùsèg ïs informèciùcsere rïvïn megakadè-lyozzèk az egysïges piac m｀kûdïsït hètrèltatù ÿjabb akadè-lyok lïtrejûttït.
Furthermore, this mechanism is a tool of better regulation since it allows the d i . e r e n t c o m p e t e n t a uijt h o r i t i e s , bo t h a t C o m mstu - n i t y and national levels, to prevent problems ex ante thus avoid-ing costly and controversial infringement proceedings which can only be launched ex post.
Ezïrt dolgoztèk ïs terjesztettïk ki fokozatosan a termïkekkel û s s z e f Ÿ g g ﾒ ûsszes m｀szaki szabèly- ïs szabvènytervezet elfo-gadès elﾒtti ètvilègótèsèt szolgèlù eljèrèst.
The exchange and gathering of information is also an e.ectivewayofensuringthatnationalbest practices become known and are used as a model for oth-er regulatory initiatives.
A Bizottsèg, a tagèl-lamok, az ipar ïs az egyïnek ógy rèlètèssal rendelkeznek a m｀-
A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula-tions and standards relating to products was therefore established and gradually expanded.
Emellett ez a mechanizmus a hatïkonyabb szabèlyozès egyik eszkûze, miutèn lehetﾒvï teszi, hogy kûzûssïgi ïs nemzeti szinten a k Ÿ l û n f ï l e illetïkes hatùsègok a problïmèkat ex ante megelﾒzzïk, ïs ógy k e r Ÿ lj ï k el a jogsïrtïsekkel kapcsolatban csak ex post megindóthatù, kûltsïges ïs meddﾒ vitèkkal ter-hes, a Bórùsèg elﾒtt zajlù eljèrèsokat.
The Commission, the Member States, in-dustry and individuals thus have an open window upon technical activities, which enables them to eliminate at source any barriers to the free movement of goods.
A rendszer minden elﾒnye csak ÿgy aknèzhatù ki az ipar szèmè-ra, ha ismeri annak m｀kûdïsït, ïs tudja, hogyan fïrhet hozzè a tèjïkoztatèsok tartalmèhoz.
Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish-ment in the Internal Market, the Commission's services are work-ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services other than Information Society services.
A Bizottsèg 2002-es jelentïsït kûvetﾒen › mely a szolgèlta-tèsnyÿjtès, valamint a belsﾒ p i a c t e r Ÿ l e t ï n valù letelepedïs szabadsègèt korlètozù akadèlyokat tette vizsgèlata tèrgyèvè › a Bizottsèg szolgèlatai a 98/34/EK irènyelv hatèlyènak lehet-sïges kiterjesztïsïn dolgoznak, hogy annak szabèlyai az in-formèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsain tÿl egyïb szolgèltatè-sokra is kiterjedjenek.
The exchange of information is carried out in accordance with a two-pronged procedure which divides the Directive into two distinct but complementary parts.
Az informèciùk cserïje egy kettﾒs eljèrèsnak megfelelﾒen zaj-lik, mely az irènyelvet kït, egymèstùl eltïrﾒ, de egymèst kiegï-szótﾒ rïszre osztja fel.
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
Bevezetïs: A 98/34/EK irènyelv › az ètlèthatùsèg eszkûze a belsﾒ piac szolgèlatèban
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
Az Eurùpai Bórùsèg Cassis de Dijon-ótïlet nïven ismerttï vèlt hatèrozatèra alapozva a Bizottsèg a 80-as ïvek elejïn ÿj politi-kèt hirdetett meg a belsﾒ piac teljessï tïtele cïljèbùl, aminek alapjèt hèrom elgondolès kïpezte:
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
Az elsﾒ rïsz az olyan ÿj nemzeti kezdemïnyezïsekre vonatkozù informèciùszolgèltatèsi eljèrèst ûleli fel, amelyek eredmïnye-kïppen a nemzeti szabvènyok megszûvegezïsïnek a nemzeti s z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i t e s t Ÿ l e t e k , az eurùpai s z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i t e s t Ÿ l e t e k , nevezetesen a CEN (Eurùpai S z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i Bizottsèg), a CENELEC (Eurùpai Elektrotechnikai S z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i Bizottsèg), ïs az ETSI (Eurùpai Tèvkûzlïsi S z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i Intïzet), valamint az Eurùpai Bizottsèg effg y Ÿ t t e s rïszvïtelïvel kell megtûrtïnnie.
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
Az eljèrès lebonyolótèsènak kûtelezettsïgït a Bizottsèg ïves szer-zﾒdïs keretïben ruhèzta èt az eurùpai s z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i t e s t Ÿ l e - t e k r e .
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
› A k Ÿ l û n û s e n a k û z effg ï s z s ï g Ÿ g y , a kûzbiztonsèg ïs a kûrnye-zet kïrdïsït ïrintﾒ fontos gazdasègi szektorokra korlètozù-dù jogharmonizèciù;
› Harmonisation limited to important economic sectors cover-ing, in particular, health, safety and the environment;
Az irènyelv mèsodik rïszïnek cómzettjei a tagèllamok, amelyek vèllaltèk a szabèlyozès t e r Ÿ l e t ï n kialakótandù kûlcsûnûs ètvilè-gótèsi ïs monitoringrendszerben valù rïszvïtelt.
The second part of the Directive is addressed to the Member States who have agreed to take part in a reciprocal transpar-ency and monitoring system in the regulatory «eld.Thisinitia-tive was original in several ways:
Ez a kezdemï-nyezïs tûbb szempontbùl is eredetinek bizonyult:
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
› A nemzeti szabèlyozèsok meg«gyelïsïnekmegelﾒzïsenalapulù szemlïlete.
Since 1984, Directive 83/189/EEC which, following codi«ca-tion later became Directive 98/34/EC, has laid down a preven-tive mechanism, the scope of which has been progressively extended.
1984 ùta a 83/189/EGK irènyelv › amelybﾒl a kodi«kèciùtkûvetﾒ-en a 98/34/EK irènyelv lett › egy olyan megelﾒzﾒ mechanizmust hozott lïtre, amelynek tèrgyi hatèlya mèig fokozatosan b ﾒ v Ÿ l .
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
› A rendszer megelﾒzﾒ jelleg｀: az informèciùszolgèltatèsra ak-kor k e r Ÿ l sor, amikor a termïkekre, illetve az informèciùs tèr-sadalom szolgèltatèsaira vonatkozù m｀szaki szabèlyok mïg csak a tervezet megszûvegezïsïnek fèzisèban tartanak, ógy azok mïg mùdosóthatùak annak cïljèbùl, hogy megfelelje-nek a belsﾒ piac alapelveinek.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Ma az Eurùpai Uniù tagèllamai kûtelesek a termïkekre ïs az in-formèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsaira vonatkozù m｀szaki sza-bèlytervezeteiket mïg azelﾒtt bejelenteni a Bizottsègnak ïs a tûbbi tagèllamnak, hogy azok › az elfogadèsukat kûvetﾒen › a nemzeti jog rïszïvï vèlnènak.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
› Nem csak a Bizottsèg, de valamennyi tagèllam is ellenﾒrizhe-ti ïs «gyelemmelkósïrhetieszûvegeketavèrakozèsi(standstill) idﾒszak sorèn. Ez utùbbiak elismertïk egy olyan eljèrès elﾒnyeit, amely viszonossègi alapon biztosót szèmuk-ra befolyèst a tûbbi tagèllam jogalkotèsi folyamatai felett.
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Az elgondolès akkoriban forradalminak szèmótott, ïs annyiban az is maradt, hogy a Bizottsèg jelenleg is vizsgèlja, kiterjeszthe-tﾒ-e a hatèlya mès t e r Ÿ l e t e k r e .
› The system also permits national draft legislation to be put on ice for a certain period to facilitate discussion at Com-munity level on the matter in the light of harmonisation initiatives.
gyelïst vïgezhetnek, azonban ez az eljèrès nehïzkesebb, ïs alkalmazèsèra is ritkèn k e r Ÿ l sor a tagèllamok kûzûtt.
Moreover, by means of this legislative observa-tory, the real needs for harmonisation can be identi«edmore easily.
szïben alkalmazèsra k e r Ÿ l t , rïszlegesen Tûrûkorszègra is alkal-mazandù a vele kûtûtt tèrsulèsi megèllapodès alapjèn.
The application of the noti«cationprocedurehasgivenrisetonew practices.
› A rendszer arra is lehetﾒsïget biztosót, hogy a nemzeti jog-szabèlytervezeteket bizonyos idﾒre fïlretegyïk, ïs a tèrgy-ban a jogharmonizèciùs kezdemïnyezïsek fïnyïben folyù kûzûssïgi szint｀ vitèt ezzel is elﾒmozdótsèk.
An entire philosophy of information exchange, dialogue and cooperation has evolved between the Member States.
A bejelentïsi eljèrès alkalmazèsa ÿj gyakorlat kialakulèsèhoz vezetett.
This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Az informèciùcsere, a pèrbeszïd ïs az effg y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û - d ï s egïsz «lozù«èjajûttlïtrea tagèllamokkûzûtt.Eza mecha-nizmus impozèns referenciaeszkûznek bizonyult, amelynek se-gótsïgïvel a tagèllamok meróthetnek partnereik elgondolèsaibùl a m｀szaki szabèlyokat ïrintﾒ kûzûs problïmèk megoldèsa ïr-dekïben, k Ÿ l û n û s e n az olyan ÿjonnan szabèlyozott t e r Ÿ l e t e - k e n , mint amilyen a gïntechnolùgièval mùdosótott szervezete-kï, a domïnnevekï ïs a gïnterèpièï.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
E z e n k ó v Ÿ l a Bizottsèg oktatèsi eszkûzkïnt is igïnybe veszi a 98/34/EK irènyelvet a tagèllamok jogalkotèsi stólusènak kiigazó-tèsa cïljèbùl.
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
A rendszer, amely meglehetﾒsen lassÿ rajtot vett, fokozatosan l e n d Ÿ l e tb e jûtt, ïs mèra szïlesre tèrta azt az ablakot, amelyen k e r e s z t Ÿ l a Bizottsèg, a tagèllamok ïs a vèllalkozèsok rèlèthat-nak a nemzeti hatùsègok ïs a s z a b v è n y Ÿ g y i t e s t Ÿ l e t e k m｀szaki t e r Ÿ l e t e n folyù tevïkenysïgïre (a termïkek ûsszetïtelïre, cóm-kïzïsïre, megnevezïsïre, vizsgèlatèra stb., valamint a termïk-nek a hulladïkkezelïsig tartù teljes ïletciklusèra vonatkozù szabèlyok tekintetïben).
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net.
Az irènyelv hatèlya fokozatosan k ib ﾒ - v Ÿ l t , ógy ma mèr valamennyi mezﾒgazdasègi ïs ipari elﾒèllótèsÿ termïkre kiterjed, tovèbbè egyre nagyobb szèmÿ rendelkezïst vesz « g y e l e mb e , k Ÿ l û n û s e n a n n a k m effg a k a d è l y o z è s a ï r d e k ï - b e n , hogy a m｀szaki elﾒórèsoknak valù megfelelïst kûzvetett mùdon elﾒórù rendelkezïsek kicsÿsszanak a hèlùn.
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
1998-ban a 98/48/EK irènyelv kiterjesztette az eljèrès hatùkûrït, ami ógy az informèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsaira vonatkozù szabèlyokat is magèban foglalja.
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended.
Az irènyelv t e r Ÿ l e t i hatèlya is fokozatosan kiszïlesedett.
Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
A 98/34/EK irènyelv, amely mèr 1990 ùta az EFTA-orszègok egy rï-
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p. 75) and by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/10/EC of 23 March 1994 (OJ L 100, 19.4.1994, p. 30).
A 83/189/EGK irènyelvet mindenekelﾒtt a Tanècs 1988. mèrcius 22-i 88/182/EGK irènyelve (HL L 81., 1988.3.26., 75. o.), tovèbbè az Eurùpai Parlament ïs a Tanècs 1994. mèrcius 23-i 94/10/EK irènyelve (HL L 100., 1994.4.19., 30. o.) mùdosótotta.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
Az EFTA ïs az EGK tagèllamok kûzûtt lïtrejûtt, a m｀szaki szabèlyok terïn tûrtïnﾒ informèciùszolgèltatèsi eljèrès megèllapótèsèrùl szùlù megèllapodès 1990 novemberïben lïpett hatèlyba.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Az Eurùpai Gazdasègi Tïrsïgrﾒl szùlù megèllapodès, amely 1994. januèr 1-jïtﾒl alkalmazandù, kïsﾒbb a s z Ÿ k s ï g e s kiigazótèsok-kal magèba foglalta a 83/189/EGK irènyelvet.
Switzerland, though not a signatory to this Agreement, continues to apply the procedure for the exchange of in-formation.
Bèr Svèjc nem órta alè ezt a megèllapodèst, az informèciùk cserïjïben tovèbbra is alkalmazza az eljèrèst.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol.
Az Eurùpai Gazdasègi Kûzûssïg ïs Tûrûkorszèg kûzûtti tèrsulèst lïtrehozù megèllapodès (HL C kût.
16 No C 113, 24.12.1973) and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the «nalphaseofthecustomsunion(OJL35,13.2.1996,p.1).
16. sz. C 113., 1973.12.24., angol nyelv｀ vèltozat) ïs a vèm-uniù vïgsﾒ fèzisènak megvalùsótèsèrùl szùlù, 1995. december 22-i 1/95 EK›Tûrûkorszèg tèrsulèsi tanècsi hatèrozat (HL L 39., 1996.12.13., 1. o.).
Convention No 180 of the Council of Europe on Information and Legal Co-operation concerning `Information Society Services'.
Az Eurùpa Tanècs 180. egyezmïnye az ¶informèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsait• ïrintﾒ tèjïkoztatèsrùl ïs jogi effg y Ÿ t t m ｀ k û d ï s r ﾒ l .
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
biztosótja a letelepedïs szabadsègèt ïs az informèciùs tèrsada-lom szolgèltatèsainak szabad èramlèsèt korlètozù ÿjabb akadè-lyok kialakulèsènak megelﾒzïsït, amely azt vizsgèlja, hogy az e t e r Ÿ l e t e n hozott ÿj nemzeti jogszabèlyok ûsszeegyeztethetﾒ-ek-e az EK-Szerzﾒdïs 43. ïs 49. cikkïben foglaltakkal.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
Az Eurùpai Bórùsèg joggyakorlatènak megfelelﾒen a Szerzﾒdïs 43. ïs 49. cikke elﾒórja a korlètozèsok › vagyis az ûsszes olyan intïzkedïs felszèmolèsèt, ¶amely tiltja, akadèlyozza, vagy kevïs-bï vonzùvè teszi az ilyen szabadsègok [a letelepedïs ïs a szol-gèltatèsnyÿjtès szabadsègènak] gyakorlèsèt•.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Ennek az elvnek az ïrtelmïben minden tagèllamnak el kell fo-gadnia, hogy a tûbbi tagèllamban jogszer｀en elﾒèllótott vagy forgalomba hozott termïkeket a t e r Ÿ l e t ï n ïrtïkesótsïk, feltïve, hogy › amennyiben jogos, pïldèul az egïszsïghez vagy a biz-tonsèghoz f｀zﾒdﾒ ïrdekek forognak kockèn › ezek a termïkek a hazai termïkekïvel egyenïrtïk｀ szint｀ vïdelmet kïpesek garantèlni.
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Ahhoz, hogy egy nem harmonizèlt t e r Ÿ l e t e n valamely nemzeti korlètozès a belsﾒ piac biztosótotta alapvetﾒ szabadsègjogok alùl kivïtelkïnt elfogadhatù lehessen, e joggyakorlat alapjèn meg kell feleljen a m effg k Ÿ l û n b û z t e t ï s tilalma, a s z Ÿ k s ï g e s s ï g ïs az arènyossèg elvïnek.
Furthermore, the provisions of Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the « n a l p h a s e o ft h e C uffs t o m s U n i o n , which provides for the elimination of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent e . e c t b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d Tffu r k e y , a r e i n t e r p r e t e d f o r the purposes of their implementation and application to products covered by the Customs Union, in conformity with the relevant decisions of the European Court of Justice con-cerning provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 28 to 30 thereof.
Mindemellett a vèmuniù vïgsﾒ fèzisènak megvalùsótèsèrùl szù-lù, 1995. december 22-i 1/95 EK›Tûrûkorszèg tèrsulèsi tanècsi hatèrozatban › mely hatèrozat az EU ïs Tûrûkorszèg kûzûtt a mennyisïgi korlètozèsok, illetve a mennyisïgi korlètozèsokkal azonos hatèsÿ intïzkedïsek felszèmolèsèrùl rendelkezik › fog-lalt rendelkezïseket a vïgrehajtèsuk ïs alkalmazèsuk szem-pontjèbùl ÿgy kell ïrtelmezni, hogy azok kiterjednek a vèm-uniù hatèlya alè esﾒ termïkekre, ûsszhangban az EK-Szerzﾒdïs egyes rendelkezïseit › k Ÿ l û n û s e n a 28›30. cikket › illetﾒen az Eurùpai Bórùsèg èltal hozott vonatkozù hatèrozatokkal.
Directive 98/34/EC, by extending the scope of application of the information procedure to rules on Information Society services, ensured, since August 1999, the prevention of new barriers to the freedom of establishment and the free move-ment of Information Society services by providing a mecha-nism to analyse the compatibility of new national legislation in this « e l d w i t h A r t i c l e s 4 3 a n d 4 9 o ft h e E C T r e a t y .
KŸlûnûsen a szolgèltatèsnyÿjtès szabadsègèt illetﾒen ez annyit je-lent, hogy azok a nemzeti elﾒórèsok, amelyek nincsenek tekintettel a gazdasègi szereplﾒ èltal a letelepedïsïnek helye szerinti tagèl-lamban › amelynek t e r Ÿ l e t ï r ﾒ l szolgèltatèsait kónèlja › mèr telje-sótett kûvetelmïnyekre, arènytalan korlètozèsnak m i n ﾒ s Ÿ l n e k , ïs ezïrt a kûzûssïgi jog alapjèn elfogadhatatlanok a kïrdïses szol-gèltatèsnyÿjtès helye szerinti tagèllamban › ógy az informèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsai esetïben is › a n ï l k Ÿ l , hogy a szolgèlta-tèst nyÿjtù gazdasègi szereplﾒnek azon tagèllam t e r Ÿ l e t ï r e kelle-ne lïpnie, ahol szolgèltatèsèt igïnybe veszik.
According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, Ar-ticles 43 and 49 of the Treaty require the elimination of restric-
A tèjïkoztatèsi eljèrès alkalmazèsi kûrïnek az informèciùs tèr-sadalom szolgèltatèsaira valù kiterjesztïsïvel a 98/34/EK irèny-elv 1999 augusztusètùl egy olyan mechanizmus segótsïgïvel
The Commission has also made sure that planned national rules do not impose needless or exces-
Ezïrt az informèciùs tèrsadalom szolgèltatèsai terïn kidolgo-zott nemzeti jogszabèlytervezetek vizsgèlatènèl a Bizottsèg