natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The main impacts support one or more programme objectives and all programme objectives are supported by impacts.
A legfﾒbb hatèsok a program egy vagy tûbb cïlkit｀zïsït tèmogatjèk, ïs a program ûsszes cïlkit｀zïsït tèmogatjèk hatèsok.
The e . e c t i v e n e s s o f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe i s t hffu s e n s u r e d b y t h e cffo n t r i bu t i o n s o f bo t h t h e o u tp uijt s and the impacts.
A Daphne program hatèsossègèt tehèt a vóvmènyoknak ïs hatèsoknak a cïlkit｀zïsekhez valù e g y Ÿ t t e s hozzèjèrulèsa biztosótja.
The analysis produced a number of recommendations for sustaining that e.ectiveness:
Az elemzïs a hatèsossèg fenntartèsèra vonatkozùan tûbb ajènlèssal èllt elﾒ:
‡ encourage tangible outputs, such as videos or training modules, that are easy to replicate or to adapt in other areas or with other professionals working with end-bene«ciaries;
‒ kïzzelfoghatù vóvmènyok ûsztûnzïse, ÿgymint videùkï, oktatèsi modulokï, melyek kûny-nyen sokszorosóthatùk, illetve adaptèlhatùk mèst t e r Ÿ l e t e k r e vagy a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnye-zettekkel dolgozù mès foglalkozèsÿakra;
‡ increase dissemination activities so that project results get more visibility with decision-makers;
‒ a terjesztïsi tevïkenysïgek fokozèsa, annak ïrdekïben, hogy a projektek eredmïnyei lèt-hatùbbè vèljanak a dûntïshozùk szèmèra;
‡ increasingly involve target groups, end-bene«ciariesandkeystakeholdersasearlyasthedesign stage of the project.
‒ a cïlcsoportok, vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettek ïs kulcsfontossègÿ ïrdekeltek fokozott bevo-nèsa mèr a projekt tervezïsi fèzisèba is.
The programme e/ciencymeasurestherelationbetweeninputsononehandandoutputsand impacts on the other hand, with a view to assessing the value for money.
A program hatïkonysèga a rèfordótèsok ïs a vóvmènyok, hatèsok kûzti kapcsolatot mïri, a pïnzïrt kapott ïrtïk megbecslïsïnek cïlzatèval.
A programme like Daphne is, however, not a production unit, the costs and bene«tsofwhichcan be precisely estimated in monetary terms.
Azonban az olyan programok, mint amilyen a Daphne, nem termelïsi egysïgek, melyek kûlt-sïgei ïs elﾒnyei pontosan kifejezhetﾒk p ï n z Ÿ g y i mutatùkkal.
Although most of the inputs are known ̌ in terms of funds ̌ it is meaningless to put a monetary value on the outputs or impacts: for example, the value of enabling children and women to protect themselves better and prevent violence cannot be expressed in commercial terms.
Jùllehet a rèfordótèsok zûme ismert › mint tèmogatès ›, ïrtelmetlen pïnzbeli ïrtïket tulajdonótani a vóvmènyoknak, illetve hatèsoknak: pl. annak az ïrtïke, hogy a gyermekek ïs a nﾒk kïpessï vèlnak arra, hogy jobban megvïdjïk magukat, ïs megelﾒzzïk az erﾒszakot, nem fejezhetﾒ ki szèmszer｀en.
We can, however, gain indications of the usefulness of the programme, its outputs and impacts.
Lehetsïges azonban indikètorokat kïszóteni a program hatïkonysègèrùl, vóvmènyairùl ïs hatèsairùl.
Another theoretically feasible approach to assessing e/ciencywouldbetobenchmarktheinputs and outputs/impacts of Daphne in relation to a programme with comparable outputs and impacts.
A hatïkonysèg megbecslïsïnek mèsik lehetsïges elmïleti megkûzelótïse a Daphne program rèfordótèsainak, illetve vóvmènyainak ïs hatèsainak teljesótmïnyïrtïkelïse volna egy hasonlù vóvmènyokat ïs hatèsokat hozù mèsik program t Ÿ k r ï b e n .
However, to our knowledge and according to the stakeholders interviewed, Daphne is unique, and no comparable programme exists, although there are national initia-tives that cover some of the Daphne areas.
Azonban tudomèsunk ïs a megkïr-dezett ïrdekeltek vïlemïnye szerint a Daphne e g y e d Ÿ l è l l ù , semmifïle vele ûsszemïrhetﾒ program nem lïtezik, jùllehet van nïhèny olyan nemzeti kezdemïnyezïs, amely a Daphne bizonyos t e r Ÿ l e t e i t fedi le.
We have assessed e/ciencybyfollowinga p r a g m a t i c a p p r o a c h , m a k i n g t h e b e s tffu s e o f t h e d i . e r e n t k i n d s o f i nfo r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a n d f o c u s i n g o n t h e uijt i l i tffy o f t h e p r o g r a m mffe .
A hatïkonysègot az alèbbi pragmatikus megkûzelótïs keretïben ï r t ï k e l t Ÿ k , mely a lehetﾒ legjobban kihasznèlja a rendelkezïsre èllù informèciùkat, ïs a program hasznossègèra ûssz-pontosót.
T h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e sample of 148 completed projects analysed can be characterised by the fol-lowing basic facts and «gures.
148 befejezett projekt reprezentatóv mintèjèt e l e m e z t Ÿ k . Ezekbﾒl az alèbbi jellemzﾒ tïnyek ïs szèmadatok sz｀rhetﾒk le:
‡ The sample represents a total budget of nearly EUR 20 million (up to 2001), i.e. about EUR 133 000 per project and EUR 23 500 per participant.
‒ A minta mintegy 20 milliù eurùs ûsszkûltsïgvetïst kïpvisel (2001-ig), azaz kb. 133 000 eurùt projektenkïnt, ïs 23 500 eurùt rïsztvevﾒnkïnt.
‡ For two thirds of the projects, the remaining 25 % of the budget is covered by internal funds only.
‒ Az EU-tèmogatès ennek a kûltsïgvetïsnek kb.
In particular, these «guresre‹ectthedi/cultaccesstoexternalfunding,eitherbecausethisfundingisscarceorbecausesecur-ing it is not easy.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy az EU ètlagosan 2 teljes munkaidﾒs egyenïrtïknyi (TME) tèmogatèst nyÿjt minden projekthez egy ïven èt, vagy 0,35 TME-t rïszt vevﾒ szervezeten-kïnt.
The funding is often complemented by extra work from the participating NGOs as well as by volunteers. The volume of this e.ortisobviouslydi/cultto evaluate.
Egyben azt is jelenti, hogy a Daphne ètlagosan a rïszt vevﾒ szervezetek szemïlyze-tïnek 0,8%-èt tèmogatja13 egy ïven èt.
) Assuming an average of 42 full-time equivalents in the participating organisations employing less than 1 000 persons.
Âtlagosan 42 teljes munkaid┸s egyenêrtêket feltêtelezve az 1000-nêl kevesebb szemêlyt foglalkoztató rêszt vev┸ szervezetek esetêben.
‡ On average, each project generated «veoutputsthatcontributedsigni«cantlytoachievingthe six main programme objectives.
Ezek a szèmok a k Ÿ l s ﾒ tèmogatèshoz valù hozzèjutès nehïzsïgït t Ÿ k r û z i k , vagy azïrt, mert az ilyen tèmo-gatèsok ritkèk, vagy azïrt, mert biztosótèsuk nem kûnny｀.
A very impressive volume of material was dissemi-nated by 98 % of the projects and events were organised by 90 % of them: e.g. 27 projects disseminated 228 000 posters and 297 000 brochures; various events were organised, at-
A tèmogatèst gyakran egïszóti ki pluszmunka a rïszt vevﾒ nem kormènyzati szervezetek, valamint ûnkïntesek rïszïrﾒl. Az e.ïleerﾒfeszótïseknagysègètnyilvènvalùannehïzfelmïrni.
The results of the Daphne experience tended by a total of 40 000 people.
A Daphne-tapasztalat eredmïnyei
The outputs and their dissemination contributed to producing impacts on target groups, end-bene«ciaries,thegeneralpublicanddecision-makers.
A vóvmènyok ïs t e r j e s z t ï s Ÿ k hozzèjèrult ahhoz a hatèshoz, amit a cïlcsoportban, a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettekben, a nagykûzûnsïgben ïs a dûntïshozùkban s i k e r Ÿ l t kelteni.
‡ The 148 projects analysed involved 1 227 organisations.
‒ Az elemzett 148 projektben 1227 szervezet vett rïszt.
Participation in the project had an impact on 97 % of them, mainly in terms of improved expertise, improved networking ca-pacities or adoption of good practice.
A projektben valù rïszvïtel 97%-ukra volt hatèssal, mindenekelﾒtt a szakïrtelem fejlﾒdïse, a hèlùzati kapacitès javulèsa ïs a be-vèlt gyakorlatok ètvïtele terïn.
Participation in Daphne has therefore had a de«niteand positive e.ectontheseorganisations.
A Daphnïban valù rïszvïtel tehèt hatèrozott ïs pozitóv hatèssal volt ezekre a szervezetekre.
These achievements therefore represent substantial value, particularly in view of the limited funding provided by the Commission.
Az elïrt eredmïnyek tehèt komoly ïrtïket kïpviselnek, k Ÿ l û n û s e n , ha tekintetbe v e s s z Ÿ k a Bizottsèg èltal nyÿjtott tèmogatès korlètjait.
The evaluation did check whether there was any sig-ni«cantrelationshipbetweenthebudgetsize,ontheonehand,andthenatureandfrequen-cy of outputs and impacts on the other, and came to the conclusion that there was none.
Az ïrtïkelïs ellenﾒrizte, hogy van-e lïnyegi û s z - s z ef Ÿ g g ï s a kûltsïgvetïs nagysèga ïs a vóvmènyok, hatèsok termïszete, illetve gyakorisèga kûzûtt, ïs arra a kûvetkeztetïsre jutott, hogy nincs.
This is, at least partly, due to the fact that most participants in Daphne consider the budget as a tool.
Ez, legalèbbis rïszben, annak tudhatù be, hogy a Daphne legtûbb rïsztvevﾒje eszkûznek tekinti a kûltsïgvetïst.
They invest voluntary e.ortandattributehighvaluetotheprojectresults.
Ûnkïntes erﾒfeszótï-seket tesznek, ïs nagy ïrtïket tulajdonótanak a projekt eredmïnyeinek.
Value for money is also evidenced by the following elements:
A pïnzïrt kapott ïrtïkrﾒl tanÿskodnak a kûvetkezﾒk is:
‡ achievement of a high-level objective: generation of common de«nitionsoracommonapproach to a violence-related issue;
Magas szint｀ cïlkit｀zïsek elïrïse: Kûzûs de«nóciùkvagykûzûsmegkûzelótïskidolgozèsaazerﾒszakkal kapcsolatos kïrdïsekben.
‡ quality of the outputs: some outputs are still demanded after the project's end or can be easily replicated;
A vóvmènyok minﾒsïge: Bizonyos vóvmènyok irènt a projekt befejezïsït kûvetﾒen is van igïny, vagy kûnnyen megismïtelhetﾒek.
‡ project sustainability: the project still exists after the end of the contract, or it laid the foun-dations for follow-up projects.
A projekt fenntarthatùsèga: A projekt a szerzﾒdïs vïge utèn is lïtezik, vagy lefektette az utù-munkèlati projekt alapjait.
Another con«rmationofthevalueformoneycomesfromthe ex-post evaluations, carried out by independent experts on behalf of Daphne, project by project.
A pïnzïrt kapott ïrtïk mèsik igazolèsèt a visszatekintﾒ ïrtïkelïsek nyÿjtjèk, melyeket a Daphne megbózèsèbùl f Ÿ g g e t l e n szakïrtﾒk vïgeztek el, k Ÿ l û n - k Ÿ l û n az egyes projektekre.
Out of 76 projects evaluated in this way between 1998 and 2000, 79 % were assessed as providing good or excellent value for money.
Az ógy ïrtïkelt 76, 1998 ïs 2000 kûzti projekt 79%-èt ïrtïkeltïk ÿgy, mint amely jù vagy kivèlù ïrtïket nyÿjtott a befektetett pïnzïrt.
Last but not least, most stakeholders interviewed ̌ who are not past or present project co-ordinators ̌ consider that Daphne has a dual utility:
V ï g Ÿ l , de nem utolsùsorban a legtûbb megkïrdezett ïrdekelt fïl › akik nem projektkoordi-nètorok, ïs korèbban sem voltak azok › ÿgy vïlte, hogy a Daphne haszna kettﾒs:
‡ it is unique in addressing the issues of violence against women, young people and children in an integrated way (i.e. considering all the dimensions of violence) and on a European scale;
‒ e g y e d Ÿ l è l l ù a nﾒkkel, «atalokkalïsgyermekekkelszembenierﾒszakkïrdïseinekintegrèlt(azaz az erﾒszak ûsszes dimenziùjèt tekintetbe vevﾒ) felvetïsïben, valamint egïsz Eurùpè-ra kiterjedﾒ jellegïben;
‡ it brings about positive changes in the way violence is perceived and addressed in terms of prevention and protection.
‒ pozitóv vèltozèst hoz az erﾒszak ïrzïkelïsïben, illetve az erﾒszak elleni fellïpïsben, a meg-elﾒzïs ïs a vïdelem terïn.
From the evidence above, we can state that the programme is e / c i e n t , i . e . w i t h l i m i t e d E U s up po r t , signi«cantachievementsandimpactswererealised.Thisassessmentcanbetem-pered by two considerations:
A fentiek alapjèn kijelenthetﾒ: a program hatïkony, vagyis a rendelkezïsre èllù korlètos EU-tèmogatès mellett jelentﾒs eredmïnyeket ïs hatèst kûnyvelhetett el. Ezt az ïrtïkelïst az alèb-bi kït ïszrevïtellel kell k i e g ï s z ó t e n Ÿ n k :
‡ there have been additional inputs in the form of contributions in kind and the work of vol-unteers that have not been systematically calculated. These inputs have also contributed to outputs and impacts, but are not necessarily sustainable;
‒ a projektek tovèbbi rèfordótèsokat is kaptak, termïszetbeni juttatèsok ïs ûnkïntes munka formèjèban, melyek nem lettek szisztematikusan «gyelembevïve.Ezekarèfordótèsokishozzèjèrultak a vóvmènyokhoz ïs hatèsokhoz, azonban nem f e l t ït l e n Ÿ l fenntarthatùak;
‡ among the partners from the social sector, only a small number have sound expertise in resource management, de«nitionofworkplans,etc.,thatfacilitatesoptimaluseofthelimited resources available and prevents exhaustion setting in.
‒ a szocièlis szektorbeli partnerek k û z Ÿ l csupèn kevïs rendelkezik alapos szakïrtelemmel az erﾒforrès-kezelïs, a munkatervek kijelûlïse stb. t e r Ÿ l e t ï n , melyek megkûnnyótik a rendel-kezïsre èllù vïges erﾒforrèsok optimèlis kihasznèlèsèt ïs k i m e r Ÿ l ï s Ÿ k e l k e r Ÿ l ï s ït .
Results typology
Az eredmïnyek tipolùgièja
The MEANS Collection (14) de«nes`output'as`thatwhichis«nancedandaccomplished(orconcretised) with the money allocated to an intervention'.
A MEANS f Ÿ z e t e k 1 4 ÿgy de«nièljèka¶vóvmènyokat•vagy¶kûzvetleneredmïnyeket•,mint¶amelyre a beavatkozèsra elﾒirènyzott pïnzt fordótjèk, ezèltal az e l k ï s z Ÿ l , illetve konkrït formèt ûlt•.
In the case of Daphne projects, outputs consist of all the activities developed by the partners during the project in order to support the objectives of the Daphne programme and to ensure the dissemination of the project results.
A Daphne-projektek esetïben a vóvmènyok magukban foglaljèk mindazon tevïkenysï-geket, amelyeket a partnerek a projekt ideje alatt fejtettek ki a Daphne program cïlkit｀zïse-inek tèmogatèsa cïljèbùl, illetve a projekt eredmïnyeinek elterjesztïse ïrdekïben.
This section concerns thus the 148 completed projects funded from 1997 to 2001 and that were analysed (the other 74 did not answer or were no longer reachable: bank-rupt, disappeared, etc.).
Ennek megfelelﾒen a jelen szakasz azzal az 1997 ïs 2001 kûzûtt tèmogatott ïs befejezett 148 pro-jekttel foglalkozik, amelyek elemzïs alè lettek vonva (a fennmaradù 74 nem adott vèlaszt, vagy mèr nem volt elïrhetﾒ: csﾒdbe ment, nem volt mèr megtalèlhatù stb.).
The 699 outputs identi«edaredistributedasfollows:
A 699 azonosótott vóvmèny megoszlèsa a kûvetkezﾒ:
Information materials, including newsletters
Tèjïkoztatù anyagok, egyebek kûzt hórlevelek
Studies, reports and books
Tanulmènyok, jelentïsek ïs kûnyvek
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Irènymutatèsok, oktatùcsomagok, ÿtmutatùk
Direct action/«eld interventions, helplines
Kûzvetlen m｀veletek, helyszóni beavatkozès, segïlyvonalak
Websites, CDs and CD-ROMs
Webhelyek, CD-k ïs CD-ROM-ok
Videos, TV/radio spots and other audiovisual products
Videùk, tïvï-/rèdiùspotok ïs egyïb audiovizuèlis anyagok
Conferences, seminars, workshops
Konferencièk, szeminèriumok, m｀helyek
Outputs achieved within the project (699 outputs)
A projektek keretïben elïrt vóvmènyok (699 vóvmèny)
Presented di.erently,thepercentageofprojectshavinggeneratedoutputsareasfollows:
Mèskïpp bemutatva: azon projektek szèzalïkos rïszarènya, amelyek valamilyen vóvmènyt elïrtek, a kûvetkezﾒ:
Studies, reports and books
Tèjïkoztatù anyagok, egyebek kûzt hórlevelek
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Tanulmènyok, jelentïsek ïs kûnyvek
Direct action/«eld interventions, helplines
Irènymutatèsok, oktatùcsomagok, ÿtmutatùk
Websites, CDs and CD-ROMs
Kûzvetlen m｀veletek, helyszóni beavatkozès, segïlyvonalak
Conferences, seminars, workshops
Adatbèzisok, e-mail hèlùzatok
Distribution of projects according to the outputs achieved (148 projects, up to three choices per project)
A projektek megoszlèsa az elïrt vóvmènyok szerint (148 projekt, projektenkïnt legfeljebb 3 vóvmèny)
) MEANS Collection ̋ Evaluation of socioeconomic programmes, European Commission, Regional Policy DG, 1999.
MEANS füzetek, ‡Evaluating socio-economic programmes·, Európai Bizottsâg, Regionâlis Politikai F┸igazgatósâg, 1999.
The outputs `conferences/seminars', `information materials' and `audiovisual products' are those that contribute best to the raising of awareness.
Ezzel szemben az olyan vóvmènyok, mint az ¶oktatùcsomagok•, ¶tanulmènyok•, illetve ¶kûz-vetlen m｀veletek• hatnak k û z v e t l e n Ÿ l a cïlcsoportokra ïs a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettekre.
The extent to which they produce a change of mentality and behaviour is not known precisely.
Va-lùjèban azoknak a projekteknek a hatèsa, amelyek keretïben oktatèsi csomagot ïs ÿtmutatùt hoztak lïtre, nagyobb a tûbbiïnïl (lèsd mïg a hatèsokkal foglalkozù 4.4. fejezetet):
On the other side, outputs such as `training packages', `studies' and `direct actions' are those that impact directly on the target groups and on the end-bene«ciaries.Infact,theprojectsthat produced training packages and manuals show a higher impact than the others (see also point 4.4 on impacts) in terms of:
‡ ¶A cïlcsoport megvèltozott viselkedïse az erﾒszak megelﾒzïse tekintetïben• (e projektek 53%-a, szemben a teljes mintèra vonatkozù 40%-kal),
‡ `changed behaviour of target groups regarding prevention of violence' (53 % of these projects compared with 40 % for the entire sample);‡ `improved means for end-bene«ciariestotackletheirsituation'(70%oftheseprojectscompared with 55 % for the entire sample).
‡ ¶A vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettek eszkûzeinek javulèsa h e l y z e t Ÿ k kezelïsïre• (e projektek 70%-a, szemben a teljes mintèra vonatkozù 55%-kal).
The above two points, con«rmedbytheopinionofsomestakeholders,tendtoshowthatinformation campaigns are useful for actually preventing violence.
A fenti kït szempont, melyet tûbb ïrdekelt fïl vïlemïnye is alètèmaszt, azt jelzi, hogy a tèjï-koztatù kampènyok hasznosak az erﾒszak tïnyleges megelﾒzïsïben.
However, in order to im-prove the situation of the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s , d i r e c t a d v o c a c y w i t h a n d s up po r t t offe n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e m o r e i m po r t a n t t h a n g e n e r a l i nfo r m a t i o n a n d a w a r e n e s s - r a i s i n g .
Ugyanakkor a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezettek helyzetïnek javótèsa szempontjèbùl fontosabb a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnye-zettek kûzvetlen felkarolèsa ïs tèmogatèsa, mint az èltalènos tèjïkoztatès ïs a tèjïkozottsèg nûvelïse.
Of the completed projects, 97 % implemented dissemination activities along the following categories:
A befejezett projektek 97%-èban valùsótottak meg terjesztïsi tevïkenysïget, a kûvetkezﾒ megoszlèsban
(N = 144 projects with dissemination)
(N= 144 projekt terjesztïssel)
38 % i"Distribution of materiali"Organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and organisation of events i"Distribution of materials and close contacts i"Distribution of materials, organisa-tion of events and close contacts
3 8 % i"Anyag terjesztïse i"Esemïnyek szervezïse i"Anyag terjesztïse ïs esemïnyek szervezïse i"Anyag terjesztïse ïs kûzeli kapcsolatok i"Anyag terjesztïse, esemïnyek szervezïse ïs kûzeli kapcsolatok
By considering each way separately, it appears that 98 % of the projects have distributed materials, 90 % have organised events and 42 % have had close contacts.
Az egyes mùdokat k Ÿ l û n v è l a s z t v a : a projektek 98%-a terjesztett anyagot, 90%-a szervezett esemïnyt, ïs 42%-a ïpótett kûzeli kapcsolatokat.
Considering their actual dissemination, a large majority of projects performed better than planned: most of the projects had equal or better performance regarding dissemination ex-penditures (89 % of projects), timing of dissemination (80 %), audience (96 %) and dissemina-tion activities (98 %).
A tïnyleges terjesztïs tekintetïben a projektek tÿlnyomù tûbbsïge a tervezettnïl jobban teljesótett: a legtûbb projekt ugyanolyan jù vagy jobb teljesótmïnyt mutatott fel a terjesztïsi kûltsïgek tekintetïben (a projektek 89%-a), a terjesztïs idﾒzótïse tekintetïben (80%), a kû-zûnsïg tekintetïben (96%) ïs a terjesztïsi tevïkenysïgek tekintetïben (98%).
The latter produced the following materials:
A szùban forgù projektek a kûvetkezﾒ anyagokat èllótottèk elﾒ:
Manuals/guidelines/training packs
3 1 àtmutatùk/irènymutatèsok/ oktatèsi csomagok
Distribution of projects according to their production of materials for dissemination (144 projects)
A projektek megoszlèsa a terjesztïsi cïlokra elﾒèllótott anyagok szerint (144 projekt)
Considering that most of the projects had a duration of one year, we can evidently state that partners have produced a lot of material over a short period, as indicated below:
Tekintetbe vïve, hogy a legtûbb projekt egyïves idﾒtartamÿ volt, fenntartèsok n ï l k Ÿ l kimond-hatjuk, hogy a partnerek hatalmas mennyisïg｀ anyagot èllótottak elﾒ rûvid idﾒ alatt, amint azt az alèbbi felsorolès is igazolja:
227 966 posters by 27 projects 13 556 newsletters by 9 projects 297 160 brochures by 27 projects 77 272 reports by 46 projects 64 600 manuals by 7 projects 27 700 books by 19 projects 370 t-shirts by 2 projects 731 456 lea‹etsby36projects 21 553 articles by 14 projects 2 000 directories by 2 projects 1 770 videos by 5 projects 5 000 stickers by 2 projects 6 000 postcards by 4 projects 16 152 CD-ROMs by 12 projects 2 000 business cards by 2 projects 2 000 colour cartoons by 1 project 500 protocols by 1 project 200 pins by 1 project.
› 227 966 poszter 27 projektben › 13 556 hórlevïl 9 projektben › 297 160 brosÿra 27 projektben › 77 272 jelentïs 46 projektben › 64 600 ÿtmutatù 7 projektben › 27 700 kûnyv 19 projektben › 370 pùlù 2 projektben › 731 456 szùrùlap 36 projektben › 21 553 cikk 14 projektben › 2 000 cómtèr 2 projektben › 1 770 videù 5 projektben › 5 000 matrica 2 projektben › 6 000 kïpeslap 4 projektben › 16 152 CD-ROM 12 projektben › 2 000 nïvjegykèrtya 2 projektben › 2 000 szónes rajzsorozat 1 projektben › 500 protokoll 1 projektben › 200 kit｀zﾒ 1 projektben
From the survey, the following «gureshavebeenextractedonthenumbersofeventsorgan-ised and their attendees:
A felmïrïs a kûvetkezﾒ adatokkal szolgèlt a szervezett esemïnyek ïs a lètogatùk kapcsèn:
71 meetings organised for 19 projects, totalling 880 attendees 51 participations in conferences, for 6 projects, totalling 3 620 attendees 94 conferences organised for 62 projects, totalling 16 793 attendees 389 seminars organised for 64 projects, totalling 11 334 attendees245 workshops organised for 36 projects, totalling 4 356 attendees 56 project presentations organised for 6 projects, totalling 3 160 attendees 2 press conferences organised for 1 project, totalling 40 attendees 70 implementation meetings organised for 1 project and involving 546 persons.
› 2 sajtùtèjïkoztatùt szerveztek 1 projekt kapcsèn; ezen ûsszesen 40-en vettek rïszt › 70 megvalùsótèssal foglalkozù talèlkozùt szerveztek 1 projekt kapcsèn; ezeken ûsszesen 546-an vettek rïszt.
Conferences, seminars and workshops are strong instruments for networking.
A konferencièk, szeminèriumok ïs m｀helyek a hèlùzatïpótïs hatïkony eszkûzei.
Their added value for dissemination and generation of impact is, however, more questionable.
A terjesztïs ïs a hatès tekintetïben hozzèadott ïrtïk azonban kïrdïses:
‡ The resources required to organise such events are substantial, compared with other dis-semination activities such as dissemination through a website.‡ Dissemination mainly concerns the people attending.
‡ Az e.ïleesemïnyekmegszervezïsejelentﾒserﾒforrèsokatkûvetelaterjesztïsitevïkeny-sïgekhez, pïldèul egy webhelyen k e r e s z t Ÿ l i terjesztïshez kïpest. ‡ A terjesztïs javarïszt a rïsztvevﾒkre korlètozùdik.
Conferences, seminars and work-shops are useful on condition that they reach target group members and end-bene«ciariesbeyond those directly targeted by the project or that they reach key political people and thus better position the results to have a larger impact.‡ Most of the time, conferences are one-shot events: once they are «nished,thereisoftennofollow-up action with the aim of making things change.
A konferencièk, szeminèriumok, m｀he-lyek akkor hasznosak, ha elïrik a cïlcsoport tagjait ïs a vïgsﾒ kedvezmïnyezetteket a pro-jekt èltal k û z v e t l e n Ÿ l cïlba vettek kûrïn tÿl is, illetve a politikai kulcsembereket; ógy jobb pozóciùt biztosótanak az eredmïnyeknek, melyeknek ezèltal nagyobb hatèsuk lehet. ‡ Az esetek tÿlnyomù rïszïben a konferencièk egyszeri esemïnyek: amikor befejezﾒdnek, èltalèban semmifïle utùm｀velet nincs, amely a dolgok megvèltoztatèsèra irènyulna.
They therefore conclude the project activities instead of being a link in the dissemination and impact chain.‡ They often take place at the end of the project, which is probably too late to have an impact.
En-nïlfogva lezèrjèk a projekt tevïkenysïgït ahelyett, hogy szemet kïpeznïnek a terjesztïs ïs hatès lèncèban. ‡ Sokszor a projekt vïgïn k e r Ÿ l rèjuk sor, ami èltalèban tÿl kïsﾒ ahhoz, hogy hatèsa lehessen.