natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. üdvözli a Bizottság azon kezdeményezését, amely a Natura 2000 társfinanszírozása számára stratégiai megközelítést javasol, és a Dimas biztos által Párizsban, 2005. január 24-én, a "Biodiverzitás, tudomány és kormányzás" című nemzetközi konferencián tett nyilatkozatot;
Welcomes the initiative of the Commission to propose a strategic approach to co-finance Natura 2000 and the statement made by Commissioner Dimas at the International Conference on "Biodiversity, Science and Governance" on 24 January 2005 in Paris;
Amennyiben ez nem történik meg, felhívja a Bizottságot, hogy hozzon létre az új környezetvédelmi célú pénzügyi eszközön (LIFE+) belül egy, a Natura 2000 finanszírozására szolgáló külön tételt annak érdekében, hogy biztosítsa a biodiverzitás megőrzését a hálózaton belül, felhívja továbbá a Bizottságot, hogy védje meg a Natura 2000 célkitűzéseit a 2007–2013 közötti időszakra szóló pénzügyi tervről folytatott tárgyalások során, és garantálja, hogy az EU biodiverzitási stratégiája fő pillérének számító Natura 2000 igazgatására rendelkezésre bocsássák a javasolt minimális 21,35 milliárd eurót;
F ailing that, calls on the Commission to create a specific item dedicated to Natura 2000 financing in the new Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) in order to ensure the conservation of biodiversity in the network and c alls on the Commission to secure the objectives of Natura 2000 in the negotiations on the financial perspectives for the period 2007-2013 and to guarantee that the proposed minimum of €21.35 billion is provided for the management of Natura 2000 as the main pillar of the EU biodiversity strategy .
8. elismeri, hogy míg az integrált megközelítés csak akkor lehet hatékony, ha határozottan hajtják végre, a múlt tapasztalata azt mutatja, hogy korlátozott volt a sikere; úgy ítéli meg, hogy a javasolt, vidékfejlesztési és strukturális alapra vonatkozó szabályozás nem tükrözi megfelelően a Natura 2000 rendelkezéseit, nem épül a közlemény szándékaira és veszélyezteti az EU 2010-re tervezett biodiverzitási célkitűzéseit, többek között az alábbiak miatt:
Recognises that, while the integration approach might be effective if it is implemented in a robust manner, past experience shows success has been limited; considers that the proposed rural development and structural fund regulations fail to reflect adequate Natura 2000 provisions, failing to deliver upon the Communication’s ambition and putting the EU 2010 biodiversity target at risk, inter alia due to the following:
- a strukturális alap támogatására jogosult földrajzi területekre vonatkozó speciális kritériumok kizárnak néhányat a leginkább veszélyeztetett élőhelytípus és faj közül;
- the specific criteria for geographic areas eligible for structural fund support would exclude some of the most endangered habitat types and species;
- a biológiai sokszínűség megőrzése mindeddig nem tartozott a vidékfejlesztési és strukturális alapok főbb célkitűzései közé, és helyi vagy regionális összefüggésben akár ellent is mondhat egyéb társadalmi-gazdasági fejlesztési céloknak;
- biodiversity conservation has, until now, not been a major objective of rural development and structural funds, and may in a local and regional context even conflict with other socio-economic development objectives;
- a Natura 2000 társfinanszírozása közvetlenül versenyezne egyéb gazdasági és társadalmi projekttel, így a transzeurópai hálózatokkal vagy a mezőgazdasági gazdálkodás strukturális kiigazításaival;
- co-financing of Natura 2000 sites would compete directly with other economic and social projects, such as the Trans-European Networks or structural adjustment in farming;
- a vidékfejlesztési és strukturális alapok programozása és igazgatása a regionális társadalmi-gazdasági fejlődés elősegítéséhez van kötve, és az igazgatásukért felelős szerveknek jelenleg korlátozott a természetvédelmi hatásköre, és hiányzik a természetvédelmi projektek igazgatásához szükséges szakértelem és képzettség;
- the programming and management of rural development and structural funds is geared towards fostering regional socio-economic development, and the administrations responsible for managing them have, at the moment, still limited nature conservation competencies, lacking the expertise and skills required to manage projects with nature conservation objectives;
15. üdvözli a Bizottság javaslatát, amely a természetvédelmi politikát az Unió fenntartható gazdasági, szociális és regionális fejlesztésének szélesebb keretébe helyezi; mindazonáltal úgy ítéli meg, hogy a végleges javaslat nem fejez ki eltökélt szándékot ezen politika megfelelő finanszírozására és sikeres alkalmazására;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to incorporate nature-conservation policy in the broader framework of sustainable economic, social and regional development in the European Union; considers, however, that its final proposal does not demonstrate its firm resolve to provide sufficient funding for this policy and ensure its successful implementation;
A MEZŐGAZDASÁGI ÉS VIDÉKFEJLESZTÉSI BIZOTTSÁG VÉLEMÉNYE
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
a Környezetvédelmi, Közegészségügyi és Élelmiszer-biztonsági Bizottság részére
for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
The Committee on Agriculture calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Agriculture calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. whereas the Natura 2000 network is intended to lead to a genuinely European nature conservation network, based on the measures adopted in the Birds Directive
A. whereas the Natura 2000 network is intended to lead to a genuinely European nature conservation network, based on the measures adopted in the Birds Directive
Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
1). and Habitats Directive
1). and Habitats Directive
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
B. whereas the Natura 2000 network is expected to cover an area of 63,7 m hectares and the costs have been estimated at EUR 6,1 billion annually, and whereas, given that the network benefits the whole of the Union and is geared to objectives on a Community scale, it must not involve greater costs for those states containing greater biological diversity and a larger protected area,
B. whereas the Natura 2000 network is expected to cover an area of 63,7 m hectares and the costs have been estimated at EUR 6,1 billion annually, and whereas, given that the network benefits the whole of the Union and is geared to objectives on a Community scale, it must not involve greater costs for those states containing greater biological diversity and a larger protected area,
C. whereas the burden of financing nature conservation and the Natura 2000 network should be shared fairly by all EU citizens,
C. whereas the burden of financing nature conservation and the Natura 2000 network should be shared fairly by all EU citizens,
D. whereas the 2003 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy will significantly increase the costs incurred by Europe's farmers due to the provisions on cross-compliance,
D. whereas the 2003 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy will significantly increase the costs incurred by Europe's farmers due to the provisions on cross-compliance,
E. whereas farmers and forest owners can make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity on farmland through their management practices, and in many cases this results in additional spending which must be adequately compensated,
E. whereas farmers and forest owners can make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity on farmland through their management practices, and in many cases this results in additional spending which must be adequately compensated,
F. whereas the European Commission analyses three different scenarios for the future financing of the Natura 2000 network in its communication,
F. whereas the European Commission analyses three different scenarios for the future financing of the Natura 2000 network in its communication,
G. whereas in 2002 the Council set the farm budget without taking account of the extra costs to farmers and forest owners arising from the application of the commitments entered into by the Community with the Habitats Directive,
G. whereas in 2002 the Council set the farm budget without taking account of the extra costs to farmers and forest owners arising from the application of the commitments entered into by the Community with the Habitats Directive,
Welcomes the Commission's communication as a basis for analysing and determining financing methods for the Natura 2000 network;
Welcomes the Commission's communication as a basis for analysing and determining financing methods for the Natura 2000 network;
Considers, however, that the Commission's communication fails to clarify a number of gaps in the financing of Natura 2000 and that, in particular, it fails to resolve the question of how to finance the costs of the specific measures to conserve habitats and species which have hitherto been covered by Life Nature;
Considers, however, that the Commission's communication fails to clarify a number of gaps in the financing of Natura 2000 and that, in particular, it fails to resolve the question of how to finance the costs of the specific measures to conserve habitats and species which have hitherto been covered by Life Nature;
Is concerned, however, at the long delay recorded in the completion of the Natura 2000 network and the negative consequences this entails for both the more precise estimate of its funding requirements and the more effective planning and coordination of the actions it comprises; regrets that the Commission's communication does not provide a more precise estimate of the costs of the Natura 2000 network, and that insufficient account has been taken of the fact that the forthcoming enlargements of the Union will indeed entail a reduction in resources for the network, given that a larger protected area will have to be subsidised from the same amounts; calls on the Commission, in this context, to draw up a new and more precise estimate which includes the real costs of the Natura 2000 network;
Is concerned, however, at the long delay recorded in the completion of the Natura 2000 network and the negative consequences this entails for both the more precise estimate of its funding requirements and the more effective planning and coordination of the actions it comprises; regrets that the Commission's communication does not provide a more precise estimate of the costs of the Natura 2000 network, and that insufficient account has been taken of the fact that the forthcoming enlargements of the Union will indeed entail a reduction in resources for the network, given that a larger protected area will have to be subsidised from the same amounts; calls on the Commission, in this context, to draw up a new and more precise estimate which includes the real costs of the Natura 2000 network;
Recalls that the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive; strongly urges that this promise be kept;
Recalls that the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive; strongly urges that this promise be kept;
Calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that the process of completing the Natura 2000 network is speeded up and that a detailed study is made of the overall cost involved, including the following factors:
Calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that the process of completing the Natura 2000 network is speeded up and that a detailed study is made of the overall cost involved, including the following factors:
- the spending needed in order to compensate specific sections of the population affected in areas included in the network;
- the spending needed in order to compensate specific sections of the population affected in areas included in the network;
- the real needs of the Member States of the enlarged Union;
- the real needs of the Member States of the enlarged Union;
- the debate on the 2007-2013 financial perspective, which may have a catalytic effect on the future course of funding for the network, as well as Union policies in more general terms;
- the debate on the 2007-2013 financial perspective, which may have a catalytic effect on the future course of funding for the network, as well as Union policies in more general terms;
Insists that if Natura 2000 expenditure is to be included in the Rural Development Fund, the endowment of the fund needs to be increased accordingly;
Insists that if Natura 2000 expenditure is to be included in the Rural Development Fund, the endowment of the fund needs to be increased accordingly;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the differences in the area protected in the Member States in connection with co-financing proposals;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the differences in the area protected in the Member States in connection with co-financing proposals;
Believes that the Rural Development Funds can be used to compensate the extra farming costs in Natura 2000 sites, provided that this does not reduce the required funding for other measures within rural development, animal welfare, agri-environmental measures and other objectives included in the proposed Rural Development Funds regulation;
Believes that the Rural Development Funds can be used to compensate the extra farming costs in Natura 2000 sites, provided that this does not reduce the required funding for other measures within rural development, animal welfare, agri-environmental measures and other objectives included in the proposed Rural Development Funds regulation;
Considers that Natura 2000 funding used for nature management measures should be targeted at farmers or other private land-users, in order to provide them with opportunities to diversify their income basis;
Considers that Natura 2000 funding used for nature management measures should be targeted at farmers or other private land-users, in order to provide them with opportunities to diversify their income basis;
Calls on the Commission, consequently, to draw up a new proposal for the financing of the Natura 2000 network on the basis of the scenarios already put forward, which should include a policy to provide information on and raise public awareness of nature-conservation issues, with the aim of highlighting the development-related, economic and social benefits resulting from the application of the proposed measures;
Calls on the Commission, consequently, to draw up a new proposal for the financing of the Natura 2000 network on the basis of the scenarios already put forward, which should include a policy to provide information on and raise public awareness of nature-conservation issues, with the aim of highlighting the development-related, economic and social benefits resulting from the application of the proposed measures;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to incorporate nature-conservation policy in the broader framework of sustainable economic, social and regional development in the European Union; considers, however, that its final proposal does not demonstrate its firm resolve to provide sufficient funding for this policy and ensure its successful implementation;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to incorporate nature-conservation policy in the broader framework of sustainable economic, social and regional development in the European Union; considers, however, that its final proposal does not demonstrate its firm resolve to provide sufficient funding for this policy and ensure its successful implementation;
Stresses that further development and maintenance of the Natura 2000 network should be achieved preferably not through land acquisition but through long-term management contracts with farmers and other private land-users.
Stresses that further development and maintenance of the Natura 2000 network should be achieved preferably not through land acquisition but through long-term management contracts with farmers and other private land-users.
A REGIONÁLIS FEJLESZTÉSI BIZOTTSÁG VÉLEMÉNYE
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development
Fogalmazó: Jillian Evans
Draftswoman: Jillian Evans
A Regionális Fejlesztési Bizottság felhívja a Környezetvédelmi, Közegészségügyi és Élelmiszer-biztonsági Bizottságot mint illetékes bizottságot, hogy állásfoglalási indítványába foglalja bele a következő javaslatokat:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. aggodalommal szemléli, hogy késik a Natura 2000 megvalósítása;
Is concerned that implementation of Natura 2000 has been delayed ;
Believes that it is essential that there be a study made of the social and economic impact of restrictive spatial planning measures arising from the Natura 2000 network on the land concerned, those who live there and their economic activities; and likewise to demarcate the areas acquired for the conservation of habitats and biodiversity on a strictly technical and scientific basis, establish conditions for the development of job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities, and produce information which can easily be consulted by local people and local authorities;
Believes that it is essential that there be a study made of the social and economic impact of restrictive spatial planning measures arising from the Natura 2000 network on the land concerned, those who live there and their economic activities; and likewise to demarcate the areas acquired for the conservation of habitats and biodiversity on a strictly technical and scientific basis, establish conditions for the development of job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities, and produce information which can easily be consulted by local people and local authorities;
Emphasises that structural funds cannot be the only source of EU funding for the Natura 2000 networks and that funding should be coordinated with the rural development fund, LIFE+ and a dedicated fund.
Emphasises that structural funds cannot be the only source of EU funding for the Natura 2000 networks and that funding should be coordinated with the rural development fund, LIFE+ and a dedicated fund.
Calls on the Commission to guarantee adequate financing of Natura 2000, whether by means of a specific instrument, or by increasing the funding for LIFE + by including an item earmarked for biodiversity conservation, which will allow the objectives to made met;
Calls on the Commission to guarantee adequate financing of Natura 2000, whether by means of a specific instrument, or by increasing the funding for LIFE + by including an item earmarked for biodiversity conservation, which will allow the objectives to made met;
Calls for all the planning instruments to be integrated into a single Operational Plan, which will take a strategic development approach;
Calls for all the planning instruments to be integrated into a single Operational Plan, which will take a strategic development approach;
Calls for objective supports to be established to develop alternative productive, job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities with the objective of strengthening the local economic fabric, and likewise the establishment of effective measures to protect and enhance local economic resources and products, with due attention to their specific characteristics and their importance in the local economies;
Calls for objective supports to be established to develop alternative productive, job-creating and wealth-generating economic activities with the objective of strengthening the local economic fabric, and likewise the establishment of effective measures to protect and enhance local economic resources and products, with due attention to their specific characteristics and their importance in the local economies;
Emphasises that financing from the structural funds for Natura 2000 must be allocated to specific, authorised objectives, and be adequately resourced, and that their release should be made conditional on national Natura 2000 finance plans;
Emphasises that financing from the structural funds for Natura 2000 must be allocated to specific, authorised objectives, and be adequately resourced, and that their release should be made conditional on national Natura 2000 finance plans;
Points out that since the Natura 2000 network benefits the entire Union and responds to Community-level objectives, it should not represent additional costs to those Member States where biological diversity is greater and the protected areas more extensive, as laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC; calls on the Commission, for this reason, to take due account, when dealing with proposals for co-funding, of the proportionality criterion in respect of the protected area within the various Member States;
Points out that since the Natura 2000 network benefits the entire Union and responds to Community-level objectives, it should not represent additional costs to those Member States where biological diversity is greater and the protected areas more extensive, as laid down in Directive 92/43/EEC; calls on the Commission, for this reason, to take due account, when dealing with proposals for co-funding, of the proportionality criterion in respect of the protected area within the various Member States;
Calls on the Commission to require the Member States to give due consideration to the needs of Natura 2000 management when establishing their programmes for the structural funds, so they can incorporate their Natura 2000 network protection schemes into their operational plans;
Calls on the Commission to require the Member States to give due consideration to the needs of Natura 2000 management when establishing their programmes for the structural funds, so they can incorporate their Natura 2000 network protection schemes into their operational plans;
Draws attention to the need to use adequate monitoring to ensure that the institutes responsible for nature conservation are actually equipped with the requisite human and financial resources to perform their nature conservation duties;
Draws attention to the need to use adequate monitoring to ensure that the institutes responsible for nature conservation are actually equipped with the requisite human and financial resources to perform their nature conservation duties;
Véleménynyilvánításra felkért bizottság(ok)
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary