natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· A 2012. február 29-i eredmények elfogadása
· Adoption of results of 29 February 2012.
A Bizottság 2013. évi munkaprogramja: strukturált párbeszéd
Commission Work Programme 2013 : Structured dialogue
· Eszmecsere Andris Piebalgs fejlesztési biztossal
· Exchange of views with Andris Piebalgs, Commissioner for Development
2012. március 27., 11.00–12.00
27 March 2012, 11.00 – 12.00
A közös agrárpolitika reformja és a politikák fejlesztési célú koherenciája
Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and Policy Coherence for Development
· Eszmecsere Dacian Cioloş mezőgazdasági és vidékfejlesztési biztossal
· Exchange of views with Dacian Cioloş, Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development
· Eszmecsere Claus Sorensennel, a DG ECHO főigazgatójával a jogszabálytervezetekről
· Exchange of views on draft legislation with Claus Sorensen, General Director DG ECHO
· A módosítások előterjesztésének határideje: 2012. június 22., 12.00
· Deadline for tabling amendments: 22 June 2012, 12.00
2012. március 27., 15.00–15.30
27 March 2012, 15.00 – 15.30
· A módosítások előterjesztésének határideje: 2012. április 16., 17.00
· Deadline for tabling amendments: 16 April 2012, 17.00
2012. március 27., 15.30–16.00
27 March 2012, 15.30 – 16.00
Energiapolitikai együttműködés kezdeményezése határainkon túli partnerekkel: a biztonságos, fenntartható és versenyképes energiaellátás stratégiai megközelítése
Engaging in energy policy cooperation with partners beyond our borders: A strategic approach to secure, sustainable and competitive energy supply
2012. március 27., 16.00–17.30
27 March 2012, 16.00 – 17.30
2013. évi költségvetés - felhatalmazás a háromoldalú egyeztetésre
2013 Budget - Mandate for Trilogue
· Eszmecsere Giovanni La Viával, a 2013. évi költségvetés általános előadójával a fejlesztési együttműködéssel és a humanitárius segélyekkel kapcsolatos esetleges prioritásokról
· Exchange of views with Giovanni La Via, general rapporteur for the budget 2013, on possible priorities in the field of development cooperation and humanitarian aid
2012. március 27., 17.30–18.30
27 March 2012, 17.30 – 18.30
Brüsszel 2012. március 28., szerda 2012. március 29., csütörtök NAPIREND 2012. március 28., szerda 16:54 Külön szavazás – részenkénti szavazás – névszerinti szavazás
Brussels Wednesday, 28 March 2012 Thursday, 29 March 2012 AGENDA Wednesday, 28 March 2012 15:39 Separate votes - Split votes - Roll-call votes
Plenáris nyitány: az EP elnöke elítélte a franciaországi gyilkosságokat
Opening: President Schulz condemns Toulouse killings
LAURINYECZ István BXL (+32) 2 28 43943 EMAIL istvan.laurinyecz@europarl.europa.eu Andrea LŐVEI STR (+33) 3 881 64093 PORT (+36) 20 334 62 58 EMAIL Sajto-hu@europarl.europa.eu EMAIL andrea.lovei@europarl.europa.eu ADDINFO (+36) 1 411 35 52 A plenáris ülést megnyitó beszédében Martin Schulz elítélte a múlt heti montaubani és toulouse-i gyilkosságokat, amelyek során három katonát, három gyermeket és egy tanárt ölt meg támadójuk.
Andrew BOREHAM BXL (+32) 2 28 42319 STR (+33) 3 881 74005 PORT (+32) 498 98 34 01 EMAIL press-en@europarl.europa.eu The recent callous and cowardly murder of three soldiers, three children and a teacher in Montauban and Toulouse must strengthen Parliament's resolve to uphold the values of mutual respect and tolerance, said its President Schulz, opening the Brussels mini-session.
Ezek az értékek jelentik ugyanis a civilizált világ alapját - mondta Schulz.
These values are the foundation of the civilised world", he added.
2012. március 29., csütörtök, 14.00–15.00 (Koordinátorok ülése) és 15.00–18.30
Thursday 29 March 2012, 14.00 – 15.00 (coordinators’ meeting) and 15.00 – 18.30
A harmadik országokkal való együttműködést szolgálói partnerségi eszköz létrehozása
Establishing a Partnership Instrument for cooperation with third countries.
2012. évi költségvetés: III. szakasz – Bizottság Előadó: Francesca Balzani (S&D) Átcsoportosítási kérelmek
2012 Budget: Section III - Commission Rapporteur: Francesca Balzani (S&D) Any possible transfer request
2012. évi költségvetés: egyéb szakaszok Előadó: José Manuel Fernandes (PPE) EESC 01/2012 - Létszámterv – Egyéb átcsoportosítási kérelmek
2012 Budget: Other Sections Rapporteur: José Manuel Fernandes (PPE) EESC 01/2012 - Establishment plan Any other transfer request
· 2012. április 25., 9.00–12.30 és 15.00–18.30 és 18.30–19.30 (Brüsszel)
· 25 April 2012, 9.00 – 12.30 and 15.00 – 18.30 and 18.30 – 19.30 (Brussels)
2012. március 29., csütörtök (14.00–15.00)
Thursday, 29 March 2012 (14.00-15.00)
Strasbourg 2012. április 17., kedd 2012. április 20., péntek NAPIRENDTERVEZET 2012. március 21., szerda 14:39 Külön szavazás – részenkénti szavazás – névszerinti szavazás
Strasbourg Tuesday, 17 April 2012 Friday, 20 April 2012 DRAFT AGENDA Wednesday, 21 March 2012 12:42 Separate votes - Split votes - Roll-call votes
a volt Jugoszláviában elkövetett háborús bűncselekményeket vizsgáló nemzetközi törvényszék mandátumának hatásos alkalmazását támogató korlátozó jellegű intézkedések bevezetéséről szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló javaslatról
on the proposal for a Council regulation imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
(EB(2004)0348 - SN 2057/2004 – C6–0041/2004 – 2004/0114(CNS))
(COM(2004) 0348 - SN 2057/2004 - C6-0041/2004– 2004/0114(CNS))
Eljárások jelölései
Symbols for procedures
* Konzultációs eljárás leadott szavazatok többsége
* Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast
**I. Együttműködési eljárás (első olvasat) leadott szavazatok többsége
**I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
*** Hozzájárulási eljárás a Parlament összes képviselőjének többsége, kivéve az EK-Szerződés 105., 107., 161. és 300., valamint az EU-Szerződés 7. cikke alá tartozó esetekben
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***I. Együttdöntési eljárás (első olvasat) leadott szavazatok többsége
***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
Együttdöntési eljárás (harmadik olvasat) leadott szavazatok többsége az együttes szövegtervezet jóváhagyásához
***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
(Az eljárás típusa a Bizottság által javasolt jogalaptól függ.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
Módosító javaslatok jogalkotási szöveghez
Amendments to a legislative text
A Parlament módosító javaslataiban a módosított szöveg félkövér dőlt betűkkel van kiemelve.
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
A normál dőlt betű s kiemelés jelzi az illetékes osztályoknak, hogy a jogalkotási szöveg mely részeiben javasolnak javításokat a végleges szöveg kidolgozásának elősegítése érdekében (például nyilvánvaló hibák vagy kihagyások egy adott nyelvi változatban).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
Az ilyen jellegű javasolt módosításokat egyeztetni kell az érintett osztályokkal.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
EURÓPAI PARLAMENTI JOGALKOTÁSI HATÁROZAT-TERVEZET.................................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................5
EURÓPAI PARLAMENTI JOGALKOTÁSI HATÁROZAT-TERVEZET
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
a volt Jugoszláviában elkövetett háborús bűncselekményeket vizsgáló nemzetközi törvényszék mandátumának hatásos alkalmazását támogató korlátozó jellegű intézkedések bevezetéséről szóló tanácsi rendeletre irányuló javaslatról
on the proposal for a Council regulation imposing certain restrictive measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
(EB(2004)0348 - SN 2057/2004 – C6–0041/2004 – 2004/0114(CNS) )
(COM(2004) 0348 – SN 2057/2004 - C6‑0041/2004 – 2004/0114(CNS) )
(Konzultációs eljárás)
(Consultation procedure)
Az Európai Parlament ,
The European Parliament ,
– tekintettel a Bizottságnak Tanácshoz intézett javaslatára (EB(2004)0348)
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2004) 0348)
A Hivatalos Lapban még nem tették közzé. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– tekintettel a Tanács iránymutatására (SN 2057/2004)
- having regard to the Council guidelines (SN 2057/2004),
– tekintettel az EK-Szerződés 60. és 301. cikkére,
– having regard to Articles 60 and 301 of the EC Treaty,
– tekintettel az EK-Szerződés 308. cikkére, amely alapján a Tanács konzultált a Parlamenttel ( C6–0041/2004 ),
- having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0041/2004 ),
– tekintettel eljárási szabályzata 51. cikkére,
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– tekintettel az Állampolgári Jogi, Bel- és Igazságügyi Bizottság jelentésére,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0006/2004 ),
On 28 August 2003, with a view to supporting the strategy being pursued by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
On 28 August 2003, with a view to supporting the strategy being pursued by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
The ICTY was established by the UN Security Council in 1993 on the basis of Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
The ICTY was established by the UN Security Council in 1993 on the basis of Chapter VII of the UN Charter.
Its mandate is to prosecute the serious breaches of international humanitarian law committed in the former Yugoslavia after 1 January 1991. , the UN Security Council urged Member States, inter alia, 'to consider imposing measures against individuals and groups or organisations assisting indictees at large to continue to avoid justice, including measures designed to restrict the travel and freeze the assets of such individuals, groups or organisations' (sixth recital of Resolution 1503 (2003)
Its mandate is to prosecute the serious breaches of international humanitarian law committed in the former Yugoslavia after 1 January 1991. , the UN Security Council urged Member States, inter alia, 'to consider imposing measures against individuals and groups or organisations assisting indictees at large to continue to avoid justice, including measures designed to restrict the travel and freeze the assets of such individuals, groups or organisations' (sixth recital of Resolution 1503 (2003)
Document accessible at http://www.un.org/english/docs/sc under the heading 'Resolutions'. .
Document accessible at http://www.un.org/english/docs/sc under the heading 'Resolutions'. .
Since this resolution is based on Chapter VII of the UN Charter
Since this resolution is based on Chapter VII of the UN Charter
See http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapter7.htm. entitled: 'ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION', the Council of the European Union reached agreement in May 2004 on a common position under the common foreign and security policy whereby the Union agreed to act in response to the Security Council's request.
See http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/chapter7.htm. entitled: 'ACTION WITH RESPECT TO THREATS TO THE PEACE, BREACHES OF THE PEACE, AND ACTS OF AGGRESSION', the Council of the European Union reached agreement in May 2004 on a common position under the common foreign and security policy whereby the Union agreed to act in response to the Security Council's request.
The draft common position identified the persons whose assets should be frozen as a matter of priority, and the Council reserved the right to update the list thereof, using the same method, in the light of the activities of the ICTY.
The draft common position identified the persons whose assets should be frozen as a matter of priority, and the Council reserved the right to update the list thereof, using the same method, in the light of the activities of the ICTY.
Since, pursuant to Article 301 of the EC Treaty
Since, pursuant to Article 301 of the EC Treaty
Article 301 of the EC Treaty reads: 'Where it is provided, in a common position or in a joint action adopted according to the provisions of the Treaty on European Union relating to the common foreign and security policy, for an action by the Community to interrupt or to reduce, in part or completely, economic relations with one or more third countries, the Council shall take the necessary urgent measures.' , this common position has to be converted into Community law, the Commission has submitted a proposal for a regulation which provides for assets to be frozen throughout the Community.
Article 301 of the EC Treaty reads: 'Where it is provided, in a common position or in a joint action adopted according to the provisions of the Treaty on European Union relating to the common foreign and security policy, for an action by the Community to interrupt or to reduce, in part or completely, economic relations with one or more third countries, the Council shall take the necessary urgent measures.' , this common position has to be converted into Community law, the Commission has submitted a proposal for a regulation which provides for assets to be frozen throughout the Community.
Since this constitutes an exception to the free movement of capital, the legal basis is also Article 60(1) of the EC Treaty
Since this constitutes an exception to the free movement of capital, the legal basis is also Article 60(1) of the EC Treaty
Article 60(1) of the EC Treaty reads: 'If, in the cases envisaged in Article 301, action by the Community is deemed necessary, the Council may, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 301, take the necessary urgent measures on the movement of capital and on payments as regards the third countries concerned.' .
Article 60(1) of the EC Treaty reads: 'If, in the cases envisaged in Article 301, action by the Community is deemed necessary, the Council may, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 301, take the necessary urgent measures on the movement of capital and on payments as regards the third countries concerned.' .
The draft regulation is also based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty (implicit powers of the Community) on the grounds that, in the light of the strict interpretation given by the Council, the measures provided for in Articles 60 and 301 refer to third countries and not to natural persons.
The draft regulation is also based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty (implicit powers of the Community) on the grounds that, in the light of the strict interpretation given by the Council, the measures provided for in Articles 60 and 301 refer to third countries and not to natural persons.
This approach had already been used for the adoption of Regulations (EC) 2580/2001 and 881/2002
This approach had already been used for the adoption of Regulations (EC) 2580/2001 and 881/2002
Published respectively in OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
Published respectively in OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
70 and OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
70 and OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
9. , which concerned the freezing of the assets of terrorist organisations.
9. , which concerned the freezing of the assets of terrorist organisations.
Recourse to Article 308 of the EC Treaty made consultation of the European Parliament obligatory.
Recourse to Article 308 of the EC Treaty made consultation of the European Parliament obligatory.
A decision was taken that Parliament should be consulted in accordance with the urgent procedure provided for in Rule 134 of the Rules of Procedure, with a view to a vote being taken at the September 2004 part-session.
A decision was taken that Parliament should be consulted in accordance with the urgent procedure provided for in Rule 134 of the Rules of Procedure, with a view to a vote being taken at the September 2004 part-session.
When it consulted Parliament on the draft regulation, the Council also forwarded a copy of the guidelines that it had drawn up when it was debating the Commission proposal.
When it consulted Parliament on the draft regulation, the Council also forwarded a copy of the guidelines that it had drawn up when it was debating the Commission proposal.
Observations relating to the substance of the proposals submitted to the EP
Observations relating to the substance of the proposals submitted to the EP
The Council initiative supplements other measures already taken by the Council to stop the movement of indictees wanted by the ICTY for ten years
The Council initiative supplements other measures already taken by the Council to stop the movement of indictees wanted by the ICTY for ten years
Common Position 2003/280/CFSP, OJ L 101, 23.4.2003, p.
Common Position 2003/280/CFSP, OJ L 101, 23.4.2003, p.
22, renewed the following year by Common Position 2004/293/CFSP, OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p.
22, renewed the following year by Common Position 2004/293/CFSP, OJ L 94, 31.3.2004, p.
The latter Common Position was supplemented by Council Decision 2004/528/CFSP, OJ L 233, 2.7.2004, p.
The latter Common Position was supplemented by Council Decision 2004/528/CFSP, OJ L 233, 2.7.2004, p.
With regard to the form, both the Commission proposal and the Council guidelines (which are identical except for a few minor changes) are based on the model provisions set out in the 'Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy' adopted by the Council on 3 December 2003
With regard to the form, both the Commission proposal and the Council guidelines (which are identical except for a few minor changes) are based on the model provisions set out in the 'Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy' adopted by the Council on 3 December 2003
Accessible on the Council register at: http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/03/st15/st15579.en03.pdf. on the basis of the experience in this field that it has acquired over several years.
Accessible on the Council register at: http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/03/st15/st15579.en03.pdf. on the basis of the experience in this field that it has acquired over several years.
That applies in particular to the definition of 'funds' and economic resources and, especially, to the wording of the derogations admissible on humanitarian grounds to which the European Parliament devoted specific attention when it was considering similar measures designed to freeze the funds of terrorist organisations
That applies in particular to the definition of 'funds' and economic resources and, especially, to the wording of the derogations admissible on humanitarian grounds to which the European Parliament devoted specific attention when it was considering similar measures designed to freeze the funds of terrorist organisations
See, in particular:
See, in particular:
- its opinion dated 13 December 2001 on the draft Council regulation on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (4765/3/2001 - C5‑0665/2001 - 2001/0228(CNS) ), http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade2?PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT+TA+20011213+ITEMS+DOC+XML+V0//EN&LEVEL=3&NAV=X,
- its opinion dated 13 December 2001 on the draft Council regulation on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (4765/3/2001 - C5‑0665/2001 - 2001/0228(CNS) ), http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/sipade2?PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT+TA+20011213+ITEMS+DOC+XML+V0//EN&LEVEL=3&NAV=X,
- the resolutions adopted on 7 February 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0055 ): European Parliament resolution on the Council Decision of 27 December 2001 on measures to combat terrorism and ( P5_TA(2002)0048 ) European Parliament resolution on the progress made in 2001 towards the establishment of the area of freedom, security and justice provided for in Article 2, fourth indent, of the TEU,
- the resolutions adopted on 7 February 2002 ( P5_TA(2002)0055 ): European Parliament resolution on the Council Decision of 27 December 2001 on measures to combat terrorism and ( P5_TA(2002)0048 ) European Parliament resolution on the progress made in 2001 towards the establishment of the area of freedom, security and justice provided for in Article 2, fourth indent, of the TEU,
- the opinion adopted on 11 April 2002 on the proposal concerning the freezing of the assets of persons associated with the Al-Qaida terrorist network (COM(2002) 117 - C5-0132/2002 - 2002/0059(CNS) ). .
- the opinion adopted on 11 April 2002 on the proposal concerning the freezing of the assets of persons associated with the Al-Qaida terrorist network (COM(2002) 117 - C5-0132/2002 - 2002/0059(CNS) ). .
It should be noted that the draft regulation entrusts a significant role to the Commission
It should be noted that the draft regulation entrusts a significant role to the Commission
The Commission already manages most executive activities: in this connection, see the documentation accessible at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/index.htm. , which will have the task of updating:
The Commission already manages most executive activities: in this connection, see the documentation accessible at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/index.htm. , which will have the task of updating:
- in response to an instruction from the Council, the list of persons whose assets should be frozen (Annex 1), and
- in response to an instruction from the Council, the list of persons whose assets should be frozen (Annex 1), and
- in response to an instruction from the Member States, the list of authorities which may determine derogations, in particular for humanitarian purposes (Annex 2).
- in response to an instruction from the Member States, the list of authorities which may determine derogations, in particular for humanitarian purposes (Annex 2).
The information relating to the financial sanctions will be made accessible to the public and, in particular, to banking establishments, principally by the publication of a general list of the persons and assets subject to sanctions of this nature
The information relating to the financial sanctions will be made accessible to the public and, in particular, to banking establishments, principally by the publication of a general list of the persons and assets subject to sanctions of this nature
Accessible on the Internet at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/list/consol-list.htm.
Accessible on the Internet at http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/list/consol-list.htm.
This list has been compiled in cooperation with the following establishments: BANKING FEDERATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, EUROPEAN SAVINGS BANKS GROUP, EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVE BANKS, EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC BANKS - EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC BANKS AND FUNDING AGENCIES. .
This list has been compiled in cooperation with the following establishments: BANKING FEDERATION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, EUROPEAN SAVINGS BANKS GROUP, EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVE BANKS, EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC BANKS - EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC BANKS AND FUNDING AGENCIES. .
From a procedural point of view, since two texts on the same subject have been referred to Parliament, the parliamentary committee concerned will have to decided which of the two texts it wishes to adopt as the basic text to be submitted to the House (application, mutatis mutandis, of Rule 41(4) of the Rules of Procedure
From a procedural point of view, since two texts on the same subject have been referred to Parliament, the parliamentary committee concerned will have to decided which of the two texts it wishes to adopt as the basic text to be submitted to the House (application, mutatis mutandis, of Rule 41(4) of the Rules of Procedure