natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulatory quality is the responsibility of all three institutions involved in the legislative process. 
A szabályozás minőségéért a jogalkotási folyamatban részt vevő mindhárom intézmény felelős.
The Commission’s reports on the ex-post reviews carried out are systematically forwarded to the co-legislators but seldom produce a direct reaction to the Commission. 
Az elvégzett utólagos felülvizsgálatokról szóló bizottsági jelentéseket módszeresen megküldik a társjogalkotóknak, de azok ritkán jeleznek vissza közvetlenül a Bizottságnak e jelentések kapcsán.
Nevertheless, co-legislators may use ex-post reviews within the broader policy cycle when the subject matter of an ex-post review is the subject of legislative reform or renewal (see paragraphs 69 to 70). 
A társjogalkotók ennek ellenére felhasználhatják az utólagos felülvizsgálatokat a szélesebb körű szakpolitikai ciklus során, ha annak témájában jogalkotási reformra vagy jogszabályok átdolgozására kerül sor (lásd: 69–70. bekezdés).
Despite recent improvement, the “evaluate first” principle is still not respected in around a quarter of cases. 
A közelmúltbeli javulás ellenére az esetek mintegy felében még mindig nem tartják szem előtt az értékeléssel indítás elvét.
When evaluations and impact assessments are carried out simultaneously (back-to-back), this raises doubts regarding the independence of the two processes and the effective consideration of the evaluation conclusions (see paragraphs 71 to 74). 
Amikor egyidejűleg készül értékelés és hatásvizsgálat (back-to-back értékelés), kétségek merülhetnek fel a két folyamat függetlensége és az értékelés következtetéseinek eredményes mérlegelése tekintetében (lásd: 71–74. bekezdés). 41 4. ajánlás.
37 Recommendation 4 - Ensuring respect for the “Evaluate first” principle (a) The Commission should ensure that the “evaluate first” principle is systematically respected when revising existing legislation. 
Az értékeléssel indítás elve betartásának biztosítása a) A Bizottság gondoskodjon arról, hogy a meglévő jogszabályok felülvizsgálata során módszeresen érvényesüljön az értékeléssel indítás elve.
Therefore, it should not validate a proposal the impact assessment of which is not based on previous evaluation work. (b) The Regulatory Scrutiny Board should pay due attention to effective application of this principle. 
Ezért ne validálja azokat a javaslatokat, amelyek hatásvizsgálata nem alapul előzetes értékelésen. b) A Szabályozói Ellenőrzési Testület fordítson kellő figyelmet ennek az elvnek az eredményes alkalmazására.
It should publish annually a list of those impact assessments which do not respect the “evaluate first” principle. 
Ennek keretében évente tegye közzé azon hatásvizsgálatok jegyzékét, amelyek nem felelnek meg az értékeléssel indítás elvének.
Target implementation date: December 2018. The REFIT programme is unclear 96. 
Ajánlott megvalósítási határidő: 2018. december Nem egyértelmű a REFIT program logikája 96.
The REFIT programme has been instrumental in promoting a Better Regulation mind-set across the Commission in order to improve the quality of legislation. 
A REFIT program hozzájárult a minőségi jogalkotás szellemiségének meghonosításához a Bizottságon belül, javítva ezzel a jogszabályok minőségét.
However, its rationale is unclear, as are the criteria by which individual initiatives have been labelled as REFIT. 
Logikája azonban nem egyértelmű, és az sem, hogy az egyes kezdeményezések mely kritériumok alapján kapták meg a REFIT címkét.
At the same time, the toolbox presents REFIT as a specific programme. This raises questions as to its current nature (see paragraphs 75 to 81). 
Az eszköztár ugyanakkor külön programként mutatja be a REFIT-et, emiatt nem egyértelmű a program jelenlegi státusza (lásd: 75–81. bekezdés).
38 Recommendation 5 - Mainstreaming REFIT into the Better Regulation cycle The Commission should clarify the REFIT concept and mainstream its presentation and use to avoid the perception that REFIT is in some way separate from the standard Better Regulation cycle. 
42 5. ajánlás. A REFIT integrálása a minőségi jogalkotási ciklusba A Bizottság egyértelműsítse a REFIT koncepcióját, valamint gondoskodjon a program ismertetésének és alkalmazásának következetességéről, nehogy úgy tűnhessen, hogy a REFIT nem képezi teljes mértékben a minőségi jogalkotási ciklus részét.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mrs Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 16 May 2018. 
Ajánlott megvalósítási határidő: 2018. december A jelentést 2018. május 16-i luxembourgi ülésén fogadta el az Iliana IVANOVA számvevőszéki tag elnökölte II.
3 Mixed (different kinds of review) Collection and analysis of data for the review required under Article 30(9) of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions (lED) (July 2013) Commission Report: “Report on the reviews undertaken under Article 30(9) and Article 73 of Directive 2010/75/EU of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions addressing emissions from intensive livestock rearing and combustion plants” (COM(2013) 286) 17.5.13 Implementation Report Assessment and Summary of the Member States’ Implementation Reports for the IED, IPPCD, SED and WID (approved in March 2016) Ongoing Evaluation and Implementation report Evaluation of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and its triennial review (August 2016) Ongoing Implementation Report Three years of implementation of the E-PRTR - Supporting study for the European Commission (April 2012) Commission Report: “on progress in implementing Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (EPRTR)” (COM(2013) 111) 5.3.13 Evaluation Evaluation of Directive 1994/63/EC on VOC emissions from petrol storage and distribution and Directive 2009/126/EC on petrol vapour recovery — final evaluation report, Amec Foster Wheeler et al. 
05. 12. 16. 17. 16. 13. 1 2 6
Commission SWD: “REFIT evaluation of Directive 94/63/EC on the control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions resulting from the storage of petrol and its distribution from terminals to service stations and Directive 2009/126/EC on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations” (SWD(2017) 65) 28.2.17 Implementation Report Commission Report: “under Article 7 of Directive 2009/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on Stage II petrol vapour recovery during refuelling of motor vehicles at service stations” (COM(2017) 118 final) 7.3.17 Implementation Report Analysis of Member States' reports on the implementation of the Paints Directive (April 2013) Commission Report: “Report on the implementation of Directive 2004/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain paints and varnishes and vehicle refinishing products and amending Directive 1999/13/EC” (COM(2013) 704) 16.10.13 Evaluation and Implementation report Evaluation of Directive 2002/49/EC Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise (September 2016) Commission Report: “on the implementation of the Environmental Noise Directive in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2002/49/EC” (COM(2017) 151) Commission SWD: “REFIT evaluation of Directive 2002/49/EC relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise” (SWD(2016) 454) 13.12.2016 (evaluation) & 30.3.2017 (IR) Agency annual report --Air quality in Europe — 2013 report, EEA Report No 9/2013 2013 
17. 09. 28. II. 1 2 5 6 8
6 Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Saving Lives: Boosting Car Safety in the EU Reporting on the monitoring and assessment of advanced vehicle safety features, their cost effectiveness and feasibility for the review of the regulations on general vehicle safety and on the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road users (COM(2016) 787) Report (L-category vehicles) Ongoing Report SWD: General Report on REACH Accompanying the document: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in accordance with Article 117(4) REACH and Article 46(2) CLP, and a review of certain elements of REACH in line with Articles 75(2), 138(3) and 138(6) of REACH (SWD(2013) 25) Commission report: General Report on REACH Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in accordance with Article 117(4) REACH and Article 46(2) CLP, and a review of certain elements of REACH in line with Articles 75(2), 138(3) and 138(6) of REACH (COM(2013) 49) 5.2.2013 REFIT evaluation (REACH) Ongoing FC (Non-REACH) Ongoing Evaluation (Detergents) Ongoing Report COM report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents, concerning the use of phosphorus in consumer automatic dishwasher detergent (COM(2015) 229) 29.5.2015 REFIT evaluation “Ex-post evaluation of EU pre-packaging directives” (September 2015) SWD: REFIT-Evaluation of the pre-packaging legal framework Directives 75/107/EEC, 76/211/EEC and 2007/45/EC (SWD(2016)219) 4.7.2016 
04. 05. 16. 17. 15. 1 5. 2 4 5 6 8
8 Evaluation “Evaluation of Directive 2009/43/EC on the Transfers of Defence-Related Products within the Community” (June 2016) SWD: Evaluation of the Transfers Directive (SWD(2016) 398 final) Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Evaluation of Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community (COM(2016) 760) 30.11.2016 REFIT evaluation “Ex-post evaluation of Late Payment Directive” (November 2015) SWD: Evaluation of the Late Payment Directive/ REFIT Evaluation (SWD(2016) 278) Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (COM(2016) 534) 26.8.2016 Evaluation (Defective products) Ongoing Back-to-back evaluation-IA (Market surveillance) Ongoing Implementation report SWD: Guidance papers on accreditation (SWD(2013) 35) Organisation of market surveillance in the Member States (SWD(2013) 36) Commission report: Product safety and market surveillance package report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 (COM(2013) 77) 13.2.2013 
08. 08. 26. 13. 1 2 5 6 8
9 Evaluation “Evaluation of the Application of the mutual recognition principle in the field of goods” (June 2015) Back-to-back evaluation-IA (Mutual recognition) Ongoing Evaluation (Free movement of goods) Ongoing Evaluation SWD: Analysis of the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 from 2013 to 2015 and factsheets (SWD(2016) 126) Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 from 2013 to 2015 (COM(2016) 212) 1.6.2016 Report Commission report: Article 25 Report to the European Parliament and the Council on the impact of the procedures established by Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 on European standardisation on the timeframe for issuing standardisation requests (COM(2015) 198) 13.5.2015 REFIT evaluation SWD: evaluation of the modifications introduced by Directive 2007/66/EC to Directives 89/665/EEC and 92/13/EEC concerning the European framework for remedies in the area of public procurement/ refit evaluation (SWD(2017) 13) Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the effectiveness of Directive 89/665/EEC and Directive 92/13/EEC, as modified by Directive 2007/66/EC, concerning review procedures in the area of public procurement (COM(2017) 28) Treated as ongoing because published after the deadline for the sample (24.1.2017) Evaluation SWD: Evaluation of Directive 2009/81/EC on public procurement in the fields of defence and security (SWD(2016) 407) 30.11.2016 
16. 15. 2015. 13. 2015. 1 2 5 6
10 Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Directive 2009/81/EC on public procurement in the fields of defence and security, to comply with Article 73(2) of that Directive (COM(2016) 762) REFIT back-to-back evaluation-IA (IPRED) Ongoing Evaluation (OHIM) Ongoing REFIT evaluation SWD: Evaluation of the Council Directive on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents (Directive 86/653/EEC) / REFIT evaluation (SWD(2015) 146) 16.7.2015 Report SWD: Accompanying the Commission report (below) (SWD(2015)207) Commission report: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Postal Services Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC and 2008/6/EC) (COM(2015) 568) 17.11.2015 Evaluation “Evaluation of the Internal Market Legislation for Industrial Products” (13.1.2014) SWD: Part 1: Evaluation of the Internal Market Legislation for Industrial Products (SWD(2014) 23 final) Commission communication: communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: a vision for the internal market for industrial products (COM(2014) 25 final) 22.1.2014 Evaluation (Design system) Ongoing 
05. 17. 24. 13. 1 2 5 6 8
DG HOME 11 Type of ex-post review Supporting studies Commission’s documents Date of publication Evaluation “Evaluation of the Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation”, DG Migration and Home Affairs, Final report (18.3.2016) “Evaluation of the Dublin III Regulation”, DG Migration and Home Affairs, Final report (4.12.2015) Commission communication: “Managing the refugee crisis: State of Play of the Implementation of the Priority Actions under the European Agenda on Migration” (COM(2015) 510 final) Proposal for a Regulation (of the EP and Council) establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (recast) (COM(2016) 270 final; 2016/0133 (COD)) 14.10.2015 4.5.2016 Evaluation JRC Technical report: Fingerprint recognition for children (2013) EU-LISA’s input for VIS overall evaluation (3.11.2015) [limited] Commission report: “on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Visa Information System (VIS), the use of fingerprints at external borders and the use of biometrics in the visa application procedure/REFIT Evaluation” (COM(2016) 655 final) Commission SWD: “Evaluation of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and Council concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) / REFIT Evaluation” (SWD(2016) 328 final) 14.10.2016 Evaluation Tipik’s conformity check: Overall report on the transposition of Facilitators’ Package (June 2015) Evaluation and Impact Assessment Study on a proposal for a revision of the EU legal framework related to the facilitation of irregular migration (migrant smuggling) Ongoing Ongoing 
16. 15. 03. 11. 1 2 5 6 8
12 Evaluation The overall evaluation of the second generation Schengen Information System (9.5.2016) [limited] SIS technical assessment (5.2.2016) [limited] Commission report: “on the evaluation of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) in accordance with Articles 24(5), 43(3) and 50(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 and art. 
16. 09. 24. 24. 1 2 4 5 6 8
13 Evaluation on the application of the Return Directive (2008/115/EC) Final Report European Commission – DG Home Affairs (22 October 2013) Conformity check Tipik’s conformity check: Final Overall report on the transposition of Directive 2004/81/EC Study on Council Directive 2004/81/EC on the residence permit issued to victims of human trafficking and smuggled persons - Draft Final Report (February/March 2013) Commission communication: “On the application of Directive 2004/81 on the residence permit issued to third-country nationals who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate illegal immigration, who cooperate with the competent authorities.” 
14. 03. 28. 13. 1 2 4 5 6 8
17 Implementation report “One-year report on human medicines pharmacovigilance tasks of the European Medicines Agency”. 
12. 13. 1 2
19 Subject-specific report Study on the identification of potential risks to public health associated with the use of refillable electronic cigarettes and development of technical specifications for refill mechanisms (May 2016) Commission report on the potential risks to public health associated with the use of refillable electronic cigarettes (COM(2016) 269 final) 20.5.2016 
16. 16. 1 2 6
3 Regulation (EU) No 653/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 as regards electronic identification of bovine animals and labelling of beef (Commission proposal: COM(2012) 639) Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No 228/2013, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC (Commission proposal: COM(2013) 267 final) 
14. 16. 15. 16. 2014. 2015. 2016. 16. 14. 14. 14. 2015. 15. 1 2 4 5 6 8
In the European Parliament, the relevant committees take note of the Commission’s ex-post reviews and related reports. 
Az Európai Parlamentben az illetékes bizottságok tudomásul veszik a Bizottság utólagos felülvizsgálatait és az azokhoz kapcsolódó jelentéseket.
Each committee has an established internal process, where a decision is taken, usually at the level of the coordinators (the representatives of each political group in every committee), whether and how to provide a follow-up to them. 
Minden egyes bizottság kialakított egy belső eljárást arra, hogy – rendszerint a koordinátorok (az egyes képviselőcsoportok képviselői minden bizottságban) szintjén hozott – határozat esetén nyomon követik-e azokat vagy sem, és ha igen, hogyan.
Within the European Parliament, the follow-up to such Commission documents can be given, inter alia, in the form of a debate in the coordinators meeting, as part of the structured dialogue of a committee with the relevant Commissioner, as an element of the debate when discussing new legislative proposals and voting on possible amendments, or by initiating a report on the implementation of a certain EU policy, legislation, or spending programme, or can constitute an important basis for a hearing or workshop organised by the relevant committee. 
Az Európai Parlamenten belül a Bizottság e dokumentumainak nyomon követése megvalósulhat többek között a koordinátorok ülésén zajló vita formájában, egy bizottság és az illetékes biztos közötti strukturált párbeszéd részeként, az új jogalkotási javaslatok megvitatása és a lehetséges módosításokról szóló szavazás elemeként vagy egy bizonyos uniós szakpolitika, jogszabály vagy kiadási program végrehajtásáról szóló jelentés kezdeményezése révén, vagy fontos alapot jelenthet az illetékes bizottság által szervezett meghallgatás vagy munkaértekezlet számára.
The European Commission’s ex-post reviews/reports are also considered by the relevant services, namely the Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services, the Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union and the Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union when providing background research information to Members. 
Az érintett szolgálatok – nevezetesen a Parlamenti Kutatási Szolgáltatások Főigazgatósága, az Uniós Belső Politikák Főigazgatósága és az Uniós Külső Politikák Főigazgatósága – az Európai Bizottság utólagos felülvizsgálatait/jelentéseit is figyelembe veszik, amikor a képviselők számára háttérkutatási információkat szolgáltatnak.
Such background information is generally made publicly available on the European Parliament’s website (EP Think T ank). 
E háttérinformációkat általában nyilvánosan hozzáférhetővé teszik az Európai Parlament honlapján (EP Think Tank).
The development of such guidelines within the European Parliament would need to leave Members the freedom of political choice in order to freely exercise their mandate. 
Ezen iránymutatásoknak az Európai Parlamenten belüli kidolgozása során a képviselők számára biztosítani kell a politikai választás szabadságát mandátumuk szabad gyakorlása érdekében.
The European Parliament has started to draw up this comprehensive Rolling Checklist, since such information did not exist before, at least in a form available to the Parliament. 
Az Európai Parlament megkezdte ezen átfogó gördülő ellenőrzőlista összeállítását, mivel az ilyen információk korábban még nem léteztek, legalábbis nem a Parlament rendelkezésére álló formában.
This publicly available document is mainly used by the committee secretariats in order to advise their Members on how to potentially prioritise committee work within the limited meeting time available. 
Ezt a nyilvánosan elérhető dokumentumot elsősorban a bizottsági titkárságok használják, hogy tanácsot adjanak képviselőik számára arra vonatkozóan, hogy a korlátozott ülésidőn belül hogyan állítsanak fel potenciális sorrendet a bizottsági munkák között.
In the context of monitoring the transposition of EU law into national law, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission have signed the Joint Political Declaration of 27 October 2011 of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on explanatory documents (OJ C 369/15 of 17 December 2011) and the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents (OJ C 369/14 of 17 December 2011). 
Az uniós jog nemzeti jogba történő átültetésének nyomon követése keretében az Európai Parlament, a Tanács és a Bizottság aláírta az Európai Parlament, a Tanács és a Bizottság magyarázó dokumentumokról szóló, 2011. október 27-i együttes politikai nyilatkozatát (HL C 369., 2011.12.17., 15. o.), valamint a tagállamok és a Bizottság magyarázó dokumentumokról szóló, 2011. szeptember 28-i együttes politikai nyilatkozatát (HL C 369., 2011.12.17., 14 . o.).
In order to monitor the implementation and application of legislation, it is also necessary to receive information on the transposition of EU law into national law. 
A jogszabályok végrehajtásának és alkalmazásának nyomon követése érdekében az uniós jog nemzeti jogba történő átültetéséről is tájékoztatást kell kapni.
In the framework of the abovementioned joint political declarations, such information should be provided by the Member States to the Commission. 
A fent említett együttes politikai nyilatkozatok keretében ezeket az információkat a tagállamoknak a Bizottság rendelkezésére kell bocsátaniuk.
This information would also be useful for Parliament, since as a co-legislator it has an interest in knowing whether EU law is properly transposed into national law in order to allow it to develop its intended effects. 
Ezek az információk hasznosnak lennének a Parlament számára is, mivel társjogalkotóként érdekében áll tudnia, hogy az uniós jogot megfelelően ültették-e át a nemzeti jogba annak érdekében, hogy lehetővé váljon a tervezett hatások kibontakozása.