natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission acknowledges that introduction of the new ESC instrument in 2000 resulted in slow but progressive implementation but there is no link between introducing EDIS, due to start Ôat the earliest in 2002Ő, and initial difficulties in implementing ESC grant schemes introduced two years earlier. 
The Commission acknowledges that introduction of the new ESC instrument in 2000 resulted in slow but progressive implementation but there is no link between introducing EDIS, due to start „at the earliest in 2002”, and initial difficulties in implementing ESC grant schemes introduced two years earlier.
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the inexperienced agencies learning curve with the new ÔmeasureŐ mechanism. 
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the inexperienced agencies learning curve with the new „measure” mechanism.
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the learning curve those countries had to undergo with this new ÔmeasureŐ mechanism. 
Initial difficulties were mainly due to the learning curve those countries had to undergo with this new „measure” mechanism.
C 15/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 35. 
C 15/24 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.1.20.
The Phare Review identified multi-annual programming (on the basis on strengthened National Programmes for the Adoption of the Acquis and PNDPs) as a medium-term task that, under certain conditions, could have been operational from 2002 onwards. 
The PHARE Review identified multi-annual programming (on the basis on strengthened National Programmes for the Adoption of the Acquis and PNDPs) as a medium-term task that, under certain conditions, could have been operational from 2002 onwards.
A multiannual approach in the context of Phare CBC was easier to implement given the limited scope of the programme and its complementary nature of a programme conceived to work, since its outset, with Interreg (a programme with multiannual programming) at the EU-CC borders. 
A multiannual approach in the context of PHARE CBC was easier to implement given the limited scope of the programme and its complementary nature of a programme conceived to work, since its outset, with Interreg (a programme with multiannual programming) at the EU-CC borders.
As of 1999, the further alignment with Interreg meant that Joint Programming Documents in a multiannual perspective (although only indica-tive: for Phare those allocations have to be decided on an annual basis) were adopted to cover the 2000 to 2002 period and revised in 2003. 
As of 1999, the further alignment with Interreg meant that Joint Programming Documents in a multiannual perspective (although only indicative: for PHARE those allocations have to be decided on an annual basis) were adopted to cover the 2000 to 2002 period and revised in 2003.
Co-financing requirements are in all Phare investment project fiches since 2000. 
Co-financing requirements are in all PHARE investment project fiches since 2000.
As preparations for accession imposed a considerable financial burden on candidate countries, both joint and parallel co-financing was permitted under Phare. 
As preparations for accession imposed a considerable financial burden on candidate countries, both joint and parallel co-financing was permitted under PHARE.
Even though Phare is bound by annual financing decisions, both co-financing forms clearly require multi-annual budgetary planning of co-financing by the countries. 
Even though PHARE is bound by annual financing decisions, both co-financing forms clearly require multi-annual budgetary planning of co-financing by the countries.
The indicative objective of allocating approximately 35 % of Phare national programmes to ESC was Ôto be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basisŐ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999). 
The indicative objective of allocating approximately 35 % of PHARE national programmes to ESC was „to be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basis” (PHARE Guidelines Decision 1999).
Until 2002, most Structural FundsŐ national structures were not yet designated. 
Until 2002, most Structural Funds’ national structures were not yet designated.
In 2000 and 2001, the Commission was already pushing for progress by making Phare ESC investment decisions under conditions of acute institutional uncertainty. 
In 2000 and 2001, the Commission was already pushing for progress by making PHARE ESC investment decisions under conditions of acute institutional uncertainty.
However, this enter-prising approach was in the end vindicated by the outcome of the negotiations in terms of both actual results and timing. 
However, this enterprising approach was in the end vindicated by the outcome of the negotiations in terms of both actual results and timing.
In regard to Bulgaria, the Commission agreed with the CourtŐs observations in September 2002 and corrective measures were taken. 
In regard to Bulgaria, the Commission agreed with the Court’s observations in September 2002 and corrective measures were taken.
In keeping with its objective to prepare for Structural Funds, Phare ESC investments closely mirrored ESF and ERDF-type investments. 
In keeping with its objective to prepare for Structural Funds, PHARE ESC investments closely mirrored ESF and ERDF-type investments.
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/25 45. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 15/25 45.
This was evident in the 2002 Accession Partnerships priorities and Action Plans for Administrative Capacity, including for ESC institution building, which averaged about 6 % of national programmes. 
This was evident in the 2002 Accession Partnerships priorities and Action Plans for Administrative Capacity, including for ESC institution building, which averaged about 6% of national programmes.
However no tendering rules were ÔbrokenŐ in the sense of an irregularity. 
However no tendering rules were „broken” in the sense of an irregularity.
As was established in the CourtŐs Special Report on Twinning, this instrument improved significantly after its start-up phase and general conclusions cannot be drawn from difficulties in the start-up phase prior to the CommissionŐs own evaluation of the instrument and remedial measures taken. 
As was established in the Court’s Special Report on Twinning, this instrument improved significantly after its start-up phase and general conclusions cannot be drawn from difficulties in the start-up phase prior to the Commission’s own evaluation of the instrument and remedial measures taken.
To the limited extent that the respective roles of Twinning pre-accession advisers and consultants were not defined, this was a project management operational problem shared by the country administrations (mainly) and Member State project leaders responsible for these projects (and is addressed in the various replies in the CourtŐs Twinning Reports). 
To the limited extent that the respective roles of Twinning pre-accession advisers and consultants were not defined, this was a project management operational problem shared by the country administrations (mainly) and Member State project leaders responsible for these projects (and is addressed in the various replies in the Court’s Twinning Reports).
However, thanks also to the Phare ESC approach (PNDPs), overall planning capacity was established and allowed candidate countries to submit their draft SF Development plans in early 2003 (in order to assure timely approval and launch in 2004 of CSFs+OPs and SPDs). 
However, thanks also to the PHARE ESC approach (PNDPs), overall planning capacity was established and allowed candidate countries to submit their draft SF Development plans in early 2003 (in order to assure timely approval and launch in 2004 of CSFs+OPs and SPDs).
C 15/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 61. 
C 15/26 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.1.20. 61.
As highlighted in replies to paragraphs 9, 25 and 27, IB was used on the whole territory, at central and regional level, for preparing the structures due to manage the ESC, whereas, as the Phare Review stipulated: ÔPhare investment support in the ESC must be focused on a few priorities if it is to have an impact. 
As highlighted in replies to paragraphs 9, 25 and 27, IB was used on the whole territory, at central and regional level, for preparing the structures due to manage the ESC, whereas, as the PHARE Review stipulated: „PHARE investment support in the ESC must be focused on a few priorities if it is to have an impact.
This concentration requires a discipline on programming to ensure that resources are not spread too thinly across too many programmesŐ. 
This concentration requires a discipline on programming to ensure that resources are not spread too thinly across too many programmes”.
The Commission considers that an overall evolutionary strategy did exist (Progress Reports and resulting Accession Partnerships) on which the Phare programme including ESC was based. 
The Commission considers that an overall evolutionary strategy did exist (Progress Reports and resulting Accession Partnerships) on which the PHARE programme including ESC was based.
Modified Phare procedures mirrored ERDF and ESF measures to the maximum extent allowed by the external assistance provisions of the Financial Regulations. 
Modified PHARE procedures mirrored ERDF and ESF measures to the maximum extent allowed by the external assistance provisions of the Financial Regulations.
On EDIS, the Phare Review stipulated that decentralisation could not start before 2002 at the earliest due to the preparation needed to ensure adequate management and financial control systems were in place and operational. 
On EDIS, the PHARE Review stipulated that decentralisation could not start before 2002 at the earliest due to the preparation needed to ensure adequate management and financial control systems were in place and operational.
Given the legal flexibility of the Phare Guidelines, allocations were relatively high. 
Given the legal flexibility of the PHARE Guidelines, allocations were relatively high.
In 2001 to 2002, on average, ESC investment accounted for almost 37 % of national programme financing (see 38), in line with the aim in the 2000 Phare Review. 
In 2001 to 2002, on average, ESC investment accounted for almost 37 % of national programme financing (see 38), in line with the aim in the 2000 PHARE Review.
The indicative (i.e. suggestive, it was not a minimum requirement) 35 % ESC allocation was Ôto be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basisŐ (Phare Guidelines Decision 1999). 
The indicative (i.e. suggestive, it was not a minimum requirement) 35 % ESC allocation was „to be applied with flexibility on a country-by-country basis” (PHARE Guidelines Decision 1999).
The lessons learned are already being taken into account and the Bulgaria and Romania Roadmaps together with the revised Phare Guidelines already outline the strategy underway. 
The lessons learned are already being taken into account and the Bulgaria and Romania Roadmaps together with the revised PHARE Guidelines already outline the strategy underway.
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/27 71. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 15/27 71.
Phare implementing agencies, in order not to lose the experience they acquired, should become (or be integrated into) the SF managing and implementing bodies. 
PHARE implementing agencies, in order not to lose the experience they acquired, should become (or be integrated into) the SF managing and implementing bodies.
The Phare Guidelines have been revised and the Programming Guide for 2004 has already been revised to introduce multiannual planning for ESC and, where appropriate and feasible, also for institution building. 
The PHARE Guidelines have been revised and the Programming Guide for 2004 has already been revised to introduce multi-annual planning for ESC and, where appropriate and feasible, also for institution building.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 6/2004 The organisation of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals in the European Union together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 29/01) Photograph: Animal wearing the two statutory ear tags 
2005.2.4. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 29/1 I (Tájékoztatások) SZÁMVEVŐSZÉK 2004/6 sz. KÜLÖNJELENTÉS a szarvasmarhafélék azonosítási és nyilvántartási rendszerének létrehozásáról az Európai Unióban a Bizottság válaszaival együtt (az EK-Szerződés 248. cikke (4) bekezdése második albekezdésének alapján) (2005/C 29/01) Fotó: Két szabályszerű füljelzőt viselő szarvasmarha
C 29/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
Általánosháttér-információ ..................................................
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
ASzámvevőszékellenőrzése .................................................
Generalcontext......................................................... 
Aszarvasmarha-ágazatjelentősége ............................................
Introduction ........................................................... 
ATanácsésazEurópaiParlament .............................................
The Commission has no mandate to adopt implementing measures in respect of national databases.............................................................. 
Atagállamok .............................................................
There is room for improvement in the CommissionŐs rules concerning on-the-spot checks andpenalties.......................................................... . FINDINGS CONCERNING THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SYSTEM AT COMMUNITY LEVEL Absenceofpreciserulesonthemanagementofnationaldatabases................ . 
A Bizottságnak a helyszíni ellenőrzésre és szankciókra vonatkozó szabályai tökéletesítésre szorulnak ................................................................
Absence of criteria for recognition of the fully operational character of databases SupervisionbytheCommission ............................................ 
Hiányoztak a kritériumok az adatbázisok teljes működőképességének igazolásához . . . . . .
TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
ABizottságfelügyeletiszerepe................................................
31 4.2.2005 Paragraph Page I-X 3 1-6 4 1-3 4 4-6 4 7-32 5 7-10 5 11-17 9 18-26 9 27-32 12 27 12 28 13 29-31 13 32 13 33-46 13 33-34 13 35-37 13 38-39 14 40-41 15 42-46 17 47-78 18 47-54 18 55-64 20 65-71 22 72-77 24 72-74 24 75-77 24 78-91 25 92-99 29 
31 Bekezdés Oldal I–IX 3 1–6 4 1–3 4 4–6 4 7–26 5 7–10 5 11–17 9 18–26 9 27–32 12 27 12 28 13 29–31 13 32 13 33–46 13 33–34 13 35–37 13 38–39 14 40–41 15 42–46 17 47–77 18 47–54 18 55–64 20 65–71 22 72–77 24 72–74 24 75–77 24 78–91 25 92–99 29 2005.2.4.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Identifying and registering the bovine herd is an essential prerequisite in guaranteeing the traceability of beef and veal and is also an element in the conditions attached to the various bovine premiums. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja ÖSSZEFOGLALÓ I. A szarvasmarhák azonosítása és nyilvántartása a szarvasmarhahús nyomon követhetőségének alapját képezi, és egyben a marha-és borjúhúsra vonatkozó különböző jövedelemtámogatások jogosultsági feltétele.
These premiums amounted to more than 7 000 million euro in 2002 and more than 8 000 million euro in 2004. 
E támogatások összege 2002-ben felülmúlta a 7 milliárd, 2004-ben pedig a 8 milliárd EUR-t.
The main objective of the audit was to evaluate the cattle identification and registration system, at the Commission (design, implementation controls and follow-up) and in the Member States (operational system allowing effective monitoring of animals from birth until slaughter and allowing verification of correct payment of all direct aid). 
Az ellenőrzés fő célja, hogy értékelést adjon a szarvasmarhafélék azonosítási és nyilvántartási rendszeréről mind a Bizottság (a rendszer kidolgozása és megvalósításának ellenőrzése, felügyelete), mind pedig a tagállamok szintjén (működőképes rendszer, amely lehetővé teszi az állatok hatékony nyomon követését születésüktől levágásukig, illetve biztosítja a közvetlen támogatások helyes kifizetését).
The audit was carried out in the four Member States with the largest bovine herds (Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom). 
Az ellenőrzésre a négy legjelentősebb marhaállománnyal rendelkező tagállamban (Németország, Franciaország, Olaszország és Egyesült Királyság) került sor.
The identification system has four components: ear tags, passports, herd registers and the computerised database containing the details of all cattle. 
Az azonosítási rendszer négy alkotóeleme: a füljelzők, a marhalevelek, az állomány-nyilvántartások, illetve a valamennyi szarvasmarha adatát tartalmazó számítógépes adatbázis.
This database is one component of the system and was to be operational on 31 December 1999 at the latest. 
Ez az adatbázis tehát a rendszer része, és legkésőbb 1999. december 31-én működőképesnek kellett volna lennie.
Cattle identification and registration systems were set up in the four Member States more than two years after the target date of 31 December 1999 and still have some weaknesses. 
A négy tagállamban több mint két évvel az 1999. december 31-i határidő után létrehozott azonosítási és nyilvántartási rendszer még mindig nem mentes bizonyos hiányosságoktól.
For example, the passports of animals traded between Member States are not monitored, there is no exchange of information between national databases, there are delays in updating the databases and the level of reliability of the information contained in the databases must often be considered inadequate. 
Nem biztosított például a tagállamok között eladásra került állatok marhaleveleinek nyomon követése, nincsen információcsere a nemzeti adatbázisok között, az adatbázisokat késve töltik fel, és a bennük szereplő adatok megbízhatósága gyakran nem tekinthető kielégítőnek.
V. The general framework of the system was laid down by the Parliament and the Council. 
V. A rendszer általános kereteit a Parlament és a Tanács határozta meg.
The Commission was given the task of implementing certain components of the system, but responsibility for implementing the system lies with the Member States. 
A Bizottság feladata, hogy a rendszer egyes összetevőire vonatkozó végrehajtási rendelkezéseket hozzon, míg a rendszer megvalósításának felelőssége a tagállamokra hárul.
The legislation did not include procedures for Member States to exchange data on cattle movements and the exchange was in any case compromised by the fact that data format varies from one Member State to another. 
Nem vezettek be semmilyen eljárást a jogi szabályozás keretében a tagállamok állatmozgásokkal kapcsolatos adatcseréjére vonatkozóan, s az ilyen adatcsere útjába amúgy is akadályt gördít, hogy az adatformátumok tagállamonként eltérnek egymástól.
All attempts to reconcile information from the various databases have failed. 
Eddig a különböző adatbázisokból származó adatok egyeztetésére irányuló minden próbálkozás kudarcot vallott.
The Member States interpreted certain elements of Community regulations in different ways, in respect of the deadlines for tagging and reporting, the fundamental concept of Ôkeeper of bovine animalsŐ and return of animal passports. 
A tagállamok eltérően értelmezték a közösségi szabályozás egyes elemeit, például a füljelzővel való ellátásra és a bejelentés határidejére, sőt a szarvasmarhatartó fogalmának meghatározására vagy a marhalevelek visszaszolgáltatására vonatkozóan is.
The Commission was not given responsibility for adopting implementing measures for setting up and checking the databases. 
A Bizottságot nem bízták meg azzal, hogy az adatbázisokra és azok ellenőrzésére vonatkozó végrehajtási rendelkezéseket hozzon.
This explains, in part, the differences found between the Member States. 
Részben ez magyarázza a tagállamok között észlelt különbségeket.
The control and penalty systems in place have not been adapted to ensure that they are appropriate to the various keepers of cattle, such as traders, assembly centres or slaughterhouses. 
Az ellenőrzéssel és a büntetésekkel kapcsolatos intézkedések nincsenek tekintettel az olyan állattar-tókra, mint a kereskedők, a gyűjtőközpontok vagy a vágóhidak.
In addition, the databases contain certain data, such as retagging rates and delays in registration, which the Member States do not use as control instruments. 
Ráadásul a tagállamok nem használják az ellenőrzés eszközeként az adatbázisokban szereplő egyes információkat, mint például a bejelentési késedelmeket vagy a füljelzővel való újraellátás százalékarányát.
Control practices also vary greatly from one Member State to another. 
Tagállamonként igen eltérő az ellenőrzési gyakorlat is.
As far as checks on the implementation and monitoring of the cattle identification and registration system are concerned, the Commission has interpreted its own role in a restrictive manner and has given no guidance on the setting-up of the databases. 
Ami az azonosítási és nyilvántartási rendszer megvalósításának ellenőrzését, illetve a rendszer felügyeletét illeti, a Bizottság korlátozottan értelmezte szerepét, és nem szolgált útmutatással az adatbázisok létrehozásához.
No standardised management rules have been issued and no quality indicator has been developed as regards the operation of the databases. 
A Bizottság nem bocsátott ki az egységes irányításra vonatkozó szabályokat, és nem dolgozták ki az adatbázisok működésére vonatkozó minőségi mutatókat sem.
The procedures for recognising the Ôfully operational characterŐ of the databases are unsatisfactory and the CommissionŐs role is too often limited to confirming the technical existence of the databases, without evaluating their actual operation on the basis of precise management rules or predefined quality indicators. 
Elégtelenek az adatbázisok működőképességének igazolására szolgáló eljárások. A Bizottság szerepe túl gyakran abban merült ki, hogy műszaki értelemben megállapította az adatbázis létezését, de nem adott pontos irányítási szabályok vagy előre meghatározott minőségi mutatók alapján értékelést annak valóságos működéséről.
The Commission should be given adequate resources to take on a genuine guiding role in the system, in particular by drawing up standardised management rules, quality indicators and a format for the exchange of data between national databases. 
A Bizottságnak megfelelő forrásokkal kellene rendelkeznie ahhoz, hogy ténylegesen el tudja látni a rendszer irányítójának szerepét: egységes irányítási szabályokat és minőségi mutatókat kellene megállapítania, és meg kellene szabnia a nemzeti adatbázisok közötti adatcsere formátumát.
The exchange of data between Member States, and even with third countries, should be organised with a view to retaining control over intra-Community and extra-Community movements. 
Szükséges a tagállamok közötti, sőt harmadik országokat is felölelő adatcsere megszervezése, hogy ellenőrizni lehessen az állatok Közösségen belüli és kívüli mozgásait.
C 29/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 IX. 
C 29/4 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.2.4.
The administrative checks applied in the various Member States should also be compared and specifications provided for cross-checks to be carried out between the identification and registration databases and the IACS databases before the various premiums are paid. 
Ajánlatos még az is, hogy megtörténjék a különböző tagállamokban érvényben lévő adminisztratív ellenőrzések összehasonlítása, valamint annak meghatározása, hogy a különböző támogatások kifizetése előtt milyen keresztellenőrzéseket kell elvégezni az azonosítási és nyilvántartási rendszer adatbázisa és az IIER adatbázisa között.