natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C 54/36 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 Also Community legislation on animal welfare requires the appropriate level of veterinary supervision and inspections on farms and Member States are obliged to report about the results of their controls. 
C 54/36 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.3.3. Also Community legislation on animal welfare requires the appropriate level of veterinary supervision and inspections on farms and Member States are obliged to report about the results of their controls.
Article 3.8.1.3 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code provides for Guidelines for the discontinuation of specific surveillance after recognition of freedom from infection: A country that has been recognised as free from infection in accordance with the provisions of the Terrestrial Code may discontinue specific surveillance while maintaining the infection-free status, provided that: (a) it is a notifiable disease; (b) an early detection system is in place; (c) measures to prevent disease/infection introduction are in place; (d) vaccination against the disease is not applied; (e) infection is known not to be established in wildlife. 
Article 3.8.1.3 of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code provides for Guidelines for the discontinuation of specific surveillance after recognition of freedom from infection: A country that has been recognised as free from infection in accordance with the provisions of the Terrestrial Code may dis-continue specific surveillance while maintaining the infection-free status, provided that: (a) it is a notifiable disease; (b) an early detection system is in place; (c) measures to prevent disease/infection introduction are in place; (d) vaccination against the disease is not applied; (e) infection is known not to be established in wildlife.
The establishment of measures such as the imposition of penal sanctions in case of failure to notify, or enquiries and public order restrictions affecting private property, were hardly conceivable at Community level under the legal framework then applicable. 
The establishment of measures such as the imposition of penal sanctions in case of failure to notify, or enquiries and public order restrictions affecting private property, were hardly conceivable at Community level under the legal framework then applicable.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/37 53. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 54/37 53.
The Irish authorities also traced all animals introduced from the United Kingdom into Ireland and ordered their killing. 
The Irish authorities also traced all animals introduced from the United Kingdom into Ireland and orde-red their killing.
C 54/38 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 The financing decisions also clarified that only the ÔmarketŐ value of the animals was eligible for Community funding. 
C 54/38 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.3.3. The financing decisions also clarified that only the ‘market’ value of the animals was eligible for Community funding.
As far as the specific issue of indemnification of livestock farmers is concerned, the situation is very different from one Member State to another. 
As far as the specific issue of indemnification of livestock farmers is concerned, the situation is very different from one Member State to another.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/39 The Commission considers that, under such circumstances it would in future be advisable to include, either in the rules governing direct payments or in the veterinary decisions conferring entitlement to indemnification, a clause to guarantee that no double payments are made and to place the responsibility for this clearly in the hands of the Member States. 
2005.3.3. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 54/39 The Commission considers that, under such circumstances it would in future be advisable to include, either in the rules governing direct payments or in the veterinary decisions conferring entitlement to indemnification, a clause to guarantee that no double payments are made and to place the responsibility for this clearly in the hands of the Member States.
It was communicated in June 2001 to the authorities of the Netherlands in response to their question on the eligibility for the premium of animals slaughtered in the course of a FMD epidemic and was confirmed in February 2004 to the Netherlands Minister of Agriculture, specifying that the premium could be granted for animals slaughtered in a slaughterhouse as long as the sum of the premium was neither included in the evaluation of animals for the purposes of veterinary compensation nor paid on that count, in order to prevent double payment. 
It was communicated in June 2001 to the authorities of the Netherlands in response to their question on the eligibility for the premium of animals slaughtered in the course of a FMD epidemic and was confirmed in February 2004 to the Netherlands Minister of Agriculture, specifying that the premium could be granted for animals slaughtered in a slaughterhouse as long as the sum of the premium was neither included in the evaluation of animals for the purposes of veterinary compensation nor paid on that count, in order to prevent double payment.
C 54/40 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 Also, Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 obliges Member States to lay down rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of feed and food law and other Community provisions relating to the protection of animal health and welfare, and to take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. 
C 54/40 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.3.3. Also, Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 obliges Member States to lay down rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of feed and food law and other Community provisions relating to the protection of animal health and welfare, and to take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented.
The shortcomings identified by the Court are not the result of a lack of guidance by the Commission but by the administrative disorganisation attributable to the Member States, which can be accounted for to some extent by the circumstances of the crisis. 
The shortcomings identified by the Court are not the result of a lack of guidance by the Commission but by the administrative disorganisation attributable to the Member States, which can be accounted for to some extent by the circumstances of the crisis.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/41 Moreover, the CourtŐs statement relates only to payment of the balance. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 54/41 Moreover, the Court’s statement relates only to payment of the balance.
The part played by the windfall effect after the crisis is impossible to assess. 
The part played by the wind-fall effect after the crisis is impossible to assess.
However, in practice, a reasonable clinical diagnosis of FMD, even in the context of an ongoing outbreak, may only be established in animals of certain susceptible species that display clear clinical signs. (d) Article 4(3) of Directive 90/425/EEC already requires Member States to take the appropriate measures to penalise any infringement of veterinary legislation in relation to trade by natural or legal persons. 
However, in practice, a reasonable clinical diagnosis of FMD, even in the context of an ongoing outbreak, may only be established in animals of certain susceptible species that disp-lay clear clinical signs. (d) Article 4(3) of Directive 90/425/EEC already requires Member States to take the appropriate measures to penalise any infringement of veterinary legislation in relation to trade by natural or legal persons.
C 54/42 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 (e) As indicated in paragraph 80, the obligation to notify outbreaks through the system of ADNS is laid down in Directive 82/894/EEC, which also specifies the details of the required information. 
C 54/42 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.3.3. (e) As indicated in paragraph 80, the obligation to notify outbreaks through the system of ADNS is laid down in Directive 82/894/EEC, which also specifies the details of the required information.
These authorities have to take the necessary steps according to the legislation immediately, and thereby to prevent or at least limit the spread of disease. (c) Although it is advisable to slaughter the animals quickly, the need for supporting documents on the amounts to be reimbursed make it necessary to compile a detailed financial inventory. 
These authorities have to take the necessary steps according to the legislation immediately, and thereby to prevent or at least limit the spread of disease. (c) Although it is advisable to slaughter the animals quickly, the need for supporting documents on the amounts to be reimbursed make it necessary to compile a detailed financial inventory.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/43 96. 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 54/43 96.
In order to minimise the risks of economic sanctions in case of outbreaks of FMD, Directive 2003/85/EC provides the Member States with a maximum of flexibility as regards the control instruments employed to eradicate the disease quickly. 
In order to minimise the risks of economic sanctions in case of outbreaks of FMD, Directive 2003/85/EC provides the Member States with a maximum of flexibility as regards the control instruments employed to eradicate the disease quickly.
C 54/44 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 In ÔapplicationŐ of the OIE code a country may regain its previous disease-and infection-free status Ôthree months after the last case where a stamping-out policy and serological surveillance are applied....Ő With the last outbreak in the United Kingdom in September 2001 and the first meeting of the appropriate Commission of the OIE in January 2002, the United Kingdom was recognised as free of the disease by the OIE at the earliest opportunity. 
C 54/44 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja 2005.3.3. In ‘application’ of the OIE code a country may regain its previous disease-and infection-free status ‘three months after the last case where a stamping-out policy and serological surveillance are applied....’ With the last outbreak in the United Kingdom in September 2001 and the first meeting of the appropriate Commission of the OIE in January 2002, the United Kingdom was recognised as free of the disease by the OIE at the earliest opportunity.
The EU as a whole was therefore not blocked for all products for a period of 12 months. 
The EU as a whole was therefore not bloc-ked for all products for a period of 12 months.
Timely, adequate and fair compensation is therefore essential to ensure cooperation of the farming community. 
Timely, adequate and fair compensation is therefore essential to ensure cooperation of the farming community.
A draft regulation formalising the arrangements for granting Community co-funding will be presented to the Member States soon. 
A draft regulation formali-sing the arrangements for granting Community co-funding will be presented to the Member States soon.
Moreover, it is stated under point 70 that any accumulation of premiums and indemnifications should be prohibited explicitly. 
Moreover, it is stated under point 70 that any accumulation of premiums and indemnifications should be pro-hibited explicitly.
The Commission always took the view that, first, the premium could be granted to producers irrespective of the state of health of their livestock and, second, that there was good reason for granting the premium for animals slaughtered to combat FMD, if the regulatory conditions for granting the premium were met and the animals were slaughtered in a slaughterhouse. 
The Commission always took the view that, first, the premium could be granted to producers irrespective of the state of health of their livestock and, second, that there was good reason for granting the premium for animals slaughtered to combat FMD, if the regulatory conditions for granting the premium were met and the animals were slaughtered in a slaughterhouse.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/45 As it is always at pains to protect the CommunityŐs financial interests and also to simplify monitoring for both the Commission and the Member States, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down the expenditure that is eligible for Community funding. (c) As indicated above, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down expenditure that is eligible for Community funding. 
2005.3.3. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 54/45 As it is always at pains to protect the Community’s financial interests and also to simplify monitoring for both the Commission and the Member States, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down the expenditure that is eligible for Community funding. (c) As indicated above, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down expenditure that is eligible for Community funding.
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 9/2004 on Forestry Measures within Rural Development Policy, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 67/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 67/1 I (Tájékoztatások) SZÁMVEVŐSZÉK 2004/9 sz. KÜLÖNJELENTÉS a vidékfejlesztési politikán belüli erdőgazdálkodási intézkedésekről a Bizottság válaszaival együtt (az EK-Szerződés 248. cikke (4) bekezdése második albekezdésének alapján) (2005/C 67/01) TARTALOMJEGYZÉK ÖSSZEFOGLALÓ....................................................................
INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 
AzEUerdőügyitámogatásaéserdőstratégiája .........................................
EUforestrysupportandtheEUforestrystrategy ............................... EUfinancialsupporttoforests ............................................. TheauditoftheCourt ................................................... 
Atagállamokeltérőenértelmezikaz„erdő”fogalmát .................................... Nem világos, hogyan valósuljon meg az erdőstratégia megosztott irányítás mellett . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LegalFramework........................................................ 
SOK FORRÁST AZ ELŐZŐ PROGRAMOZÁSI IDŐSZAK INTÉZKEDÉSEI EMÉSZTENEK FEL . . . . . . . .
CommissionŐs information on forestry action at Member States level is still incomplete ............................................................ LARGEUPTAKEOFFUNDSFROMPREVIOUSPROGRAMMINGPERIOD............... 
Afásterületekkörnyezetbarátkiterjesztése........................................
ACOMPLEXSYSTEM........................................................ 
Bizonytalanakorábbiföldhasználatellenőrzése ....................................
Otherforestrymeasures .................................................. 
A bevételkiesés ellentételezését szolgáló kompenzációs támogatások kiszámítása . . . . . . . . . .
19 TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
Nemmegbízhatóakanemzetihatóságokhelyszíniellenőrzései ........................
Large uptake of funds for restoring damage caused by natural disasters Compliancewithtenderingprocedures .................................. 
Sok forrást a természeti csapások által okozott károk felszámolására használnak fel........................................................................
IMPACTOFAFFORESTATIONOFAGRICULTURALLANDMEASURE ................. 
65–69 14 70–74 15 75 15 76 16 77–78 16 79–87 16 ......
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union GLOSSARY OF TERMS Afforestation of agricultural land: where new forests and woodland are created from agricultural land (this afforestation policy was originally dealt with under 1992 common agricultural policy (CAP) reform as part of a set of policies to take farmland out of food production). 
2005.3.18. HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja KIFEJEZÉSJEGYZÉK Mezőgazdasági terület erdősítése: mezőgazdasági terület új erdővé és fás területté alakítása (ezzel az erdőtelepítési politikával eredetileg a Közös Agrárpolitika 1992-es reformja keretében foglalkoztak, azoknak a politikáknak a részeként, amelyekkel mezőgazdasági területeket vontak ki a termelésből).
CAP: common agricultural policy Crown cover density: proportion of area covered by the vertical projection of tree crown DG: Directorate-General EAGGF: European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund Forest action: afforestation and other forestry measures Forest area: the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation final report on global forest resources assessment (FRA), issued in 1995, defined a forest as: an area with 20 % crown cover density for industrialised countries and 10 % for developing countries. 
EMOGA: Európai Mezőgazdasági Orientációs és Garanciaalap. Erdészeti intézkedés: Erdőtelepítés és egyéb erdőgazdálkodási intézkedések. Erdő: az ENSZ Élelmezésügyi és Mezőgazdasági Szervezete 1995-ben zárójelentést tett közzé a Föld erdővagyonának értékeléséről (Forest Resources Assessment), és a következőkben határozta meg az erdőt: olyan terület, ahol a borítás iparosodott országokban 20 százalék, fejlődő országokban 10 százalék.
Forestry measures: measures (i) to improve the multifunctional role of forests and woodland and to protect against, or assist in re-establishing forests after natural disasters (fire, flood, high winds etc.); (ii) to maintain and improve the ecological stability of forests where the protective and ecological role of these forests is of public interest, and (iii) to afforest non-agricultural land. 
Erdőgazdálkodási intézkedések: intézkedések i. az erdők és fás területek többrendeltetésű szerepének javítására és a természeti katasztrófák elleni védelem céljából vagy természeti csapások (tűz, árvíz, szélviharok stb.) után az erdők újbóli létrehozásának elősegítésére; ii. az erdők ökológiai stabilitásának fenntartására és javítására, ahol ezeknek az erdőknek védő és ökológiai szerepe közérdekű; és iii. a nem mezőgazdasági terület erdősítésére.
Forestry plans: national or subnational forest programmes (or equivalent instruments) are the basis for forestry support in the EU (1). 
Erdészeti tervek: Nemzeti vagy alacsonyabb szintű erdőprogramok (vagy ezzel egyenértékű eszközök) képezik az EU-ban az erdészeti támogatás alapját (1).
They provide a framework for applying sustainable forest management. 
Ezek biztosítják a fenntartható erdőgazdálkodás alkalmazásának keretét.
They are tools for planning, implementing and monitoring forestry and forest-related activities and provide an environment for the concerted and coordinated implementation of programmes and activities by all interested parties on the basis of mutually agreed objectives and strategies (2). 
Az erdészeti és erdőhöz kapcsolódó tevékenységek tervezésének, végrehajtásának és felügyeletének eszközei, és megteremtik a környezetet az összes érdekelt fél programjainak és tevékenységének együttes és összehangolt végrehajtásához közösen megállapított célkitűzések és stratégiák alapján (2).
Forestry structures measures: measures which address the development of forests and forestry, the protection of forests against atmospheric pollution and fires and forestry research. 
Erdészeti strukturális intézkedések: olyan intézkedések, melyek az erdők és erdészet fejlesztését, az erdők légköri szennyezésekkel, tűzzel szembeni védelmét és az erdészeti kutatásokat célozzák.
OP: operational Programme. 
OP: Operatív program.
Star Committee: Commission Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development. 
Star Committee: az Európai Bizottság Agrárstrukturális és Vidékfejlesztési Bizottsága.
Sustainable forestry: a widely used definition is: Ôdevelopment which meets the need of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needsŐ. 
Fenntartható erdészet: széles körben használt meghatározása „olyan fejlesztés, mely anélkül elégíti ki a jelen szükségleteit, hogy veszélyeztetné a jövő generációinak arra való képességét, hogy kielégítsék saját igényeiket”.
Sustainable forest management thus means finding the right balance between economic, environmental and social aspects for current and future generations. 
A fenntartható erdőgazdálkodás így azt jelenti, hogy megtalálják a megfelelő egyensúlyt a jelenlegi és jövőbeli generációk gazdasági, környezeti és társadalmi szempontjai között.
Wooded land/woodland area: the UN/FAO final report on Global Forest Resources Assessment, issued in 1995, defined for developed countries as land which has some forestry characteristics but is not forest. 
Fás terület: az ENSZ/FAO 1995-ben közzétett zárójelentése a Föld erdővagyonának értékeléséről (Forest Resources Assessment) meghatározza ezt a fogalmat a fejlett országokban olyan területek leírására, melyeknek ugyan van némi erdős jellegük, de nem erdők.
It includes woody elements more than 50 cm and less than 7 m in height, covering more than about 20 % of the area. 
50 cm-nél magasabb és 7 m-nél alacsonyabb fásszárú növények borítják a terület több mint 20 %-át.
C 67/3 (1) Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 80). 
C 67/3 (1) Az 1257/1999/EK tanácsi rendelet 29. cikke (HL L 160., 1999.6.26., 80. o.).
(2) COM(1998) 649, 3.11.1998. 
(2) COM(1998) 649, 1998.11.3.
C 67/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Forests and woodlands cover 136 million ha (36 %) of the land area of the European Union of 15 Member States. 
C 67/4 HU Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja ÖSSZEFOGLALÓ I. A 15 tagállamú Európai Unió szárazföldi területének 36 %-át, 136 millió hektárt erdők és fás területek borítják.
Forestry and forest-based industries provide employment for 2,6 million people. 
Az erdészet és az erdőkre alapuló iparágak 2,6 millió embernek adnak munkát.
Although the Treaties have little to say about forestry, EU support for forestry has existed since 1964. 
Habár a Szerződésekben kevés szó esik az erdőgazdálkodásról, az EU már 1964-től fogva biztosít támogatást ezen a téren.
In 1998 the Council adopted an EU forestry strategy (1) based on two key principles: (a) forest management should be sustainable (2), (b) forests have a multifunctional (ecological, economic and social) role. 
A Tanács 1998-ban fogadta el az EU erdészeti stratégiáját (1), amely két alapelvre épül: a) az erdőgazdálkodásnak fenntarthatónak kell lennie (2); b) az erdők többrendeltetésű (ökológiai, gazdasági és társadalmi) szerepet töltenek be.
Since the year 2000, forestry measures, grouped in two categories of action, afforestation and other forestry measures, have been financed by rural development funds. 
2000 óta a két kategóriába sorolt erdészeti intézkedéseket – erdőtelepítés, illetve egyéb erdőgazdálkodási intézkedések – a vidékfejlesztési alapokból finanszírozzák.
Planned EU spending on forestry for the period 2000 to 2006 is 4,7 billion euro, half for afforestation of agricultural land and half for other forestry measures. 
Az EU a 2000–2006-os időszakban 4,7 milliárd EUR-t tervez erdőgazdálkodási célra költeni, felerészben mezőgazdasági területek erdősítésére, felerészben pedig egyéb erdőgazdálkodási intézkedésekre.
The CourtŐs audit determined whether the forestry measures were based on forestry plans or equivalent instruments; how such measures were programmed and financed; how they were implemented and what their impact was. 
A Számvevőszék ellenőrzése annak megállapítására irányult, hogy az erdőgazdálkodási intézkedések erdőgazdálkodási terveken vagy ezekkel egyenértékű eszközökön alapulnak-e; hogy miként programozták és finanszírozták, illetve miként és milyen hatással valósították meg ezeket az intézkedéseket.
Audit visits were carried out at the Commission and in the main recipient Member States (Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and France). 
Helyszíni ellenőrzésekre került sor a Bizottságnál és a fő kedvezményezett tagállamokban (Spanyolország, Portugália, Olaszország, Írország és Franciaország).