natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Graph 51 shows the number of persons from whom pecuniary gain acquired by a criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority was confiscated. 
U grafikonu 51. prikazan je broj osoba kojima je oduzeta imovinska korist za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti.
During the observed three-year period, for this criminal offence, the measure of confiscation of pecuniary gain was pronounced for 146 perpetrators, while during previous observed six-year period (from 2002 to 2007) the same measure had been pronounced for 112 convicted persons. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za to kazneno djelo mjera oduzimanja imovinske koristi donesena je za 146 počinitelja, dok je u prijašnjemu promatranome šestogodišnjem razdoblju (od 2002. do 2007.) mjera oduzimanja imovinske koristi bila donesena u odnosu na 112 osoba kojima je izrečena osuđujuća presuda.
Law on the Responsibility of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences (hereinafter: Law) was published in the Official Gazette, No. 151, from September 24, 2003. 
Zakon o odgovornosti pravnih osoba za kaznena djela (u nastavku teksta Zakon) objavljen je u Narodnim novinama broj 151 od 24. rujna 2003.
It entered into force on March 24, 2004, inaugurating liability of legal persons for committed criminal offences into the legal system of the Republic of Croatia. 
Zakon je stupio na snagu 24. ožujka 2004. i time je u pravni sustav Republike Hrvatske uvedena odgovornost pravnih osoba za kaznena djela.
The Law has since then been applied without major amendments because Law on Amendments of the Law on the Responsibility of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences (Official Gazette, No. 110 from October 5, 2007) amended only articles 9 and 10. 
Zakon je u primjeni bez većih izmjena jer su Zakonom o izmjenama i dopunama Zakona o odgovornosti pravnih osoba za kaznena djela (NN, br.
Although criminal responsibility is something often talked about, the Law itself regulates responsibility for criminal offences committed by responsible persons within legal persons. 
Zakona povećani su rasponi novčanih kazni koje se mogu izreći za pojedina kaznena djela ovisno o propisanim maksimumima kazni zatvora koje se mogu izreći fizičkim osobama.
Namely, one of fundamental principles of the Law is that a legal person, in cases prescribed by the Law, is responsible for the criminal offences of its responsible persons, and therefore we do not talk about criminal responsibility of legal persons, but about there responsibility for criminal offences. 
Naime, jedna od temeljnih postavki Zakona jest da je pravna osoba u zakonom propisanim slučajevima odgovorna za kaznena djela odgovornih osoba, stoga ne govorimo o kaznenoj odgovornosti pravnih osoba, nego o njihovoj odgovornosti za kaznena djela.
Experiences gathered so far indicate that by pronouncing sanctions to the legal person, in accordance with the Law on the Responsibility of Legal Persons for Criminal Offences, one can influence economic subjects to refrain from committing criminal offences, thus influencing legal persons to act more responsible. 
Dosadašnja iskustva pokazuju da se izricanjem sankcija pravnoj osobi u skladu sa Zakonom o odgovornosti pravnih osoba za kaznena djela može utjecati na gospodarske subjekte da ne čine kaznena djela i samim tim utjecati na odgovornije ponašanje pravnih osoba.
In some cases it is necessary to sanction the legal person because by sanctioning only the responsible person the purpose of sanction would not be achieved. 
U pojedinim slučajevima kažnjavanje pravne osobe nužno je jer se kažnjavanjem samo odgovorne osobe ne postiže svrha kažnjavanja.
Legal person is sanctioned for the criminal offence of its responsible person „if it violates certain obligation of the legal person, or by it legal person acquired or ought to acquire illegal pecuniary gain for itself or someone else“ (Article 3 of the ZOPOKD). 
Pravna osoba kažnjava se za kazneno djelo odgovorne osobe “ako se njime povređuje neka dužnost pravne osobe ili je njime pravna osoba ostvarila ili trebala ostvariti protupravnu imovinsku korist za sebe i drugoga” (članak 3.
During the observed three-year period, public prosecutor's offices made 54 decisions after the submission of crime reports against legal persons. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju državna odvjetništva donijela su 54 odluke u povodu kaznenih prijava protiv pravnih osoba.
With regard to the observed three-year period, 20 crime reports were submitted for paragraph 1, 12 crime reports for paragraph 2, 5 crime reports for paragraph 3 wile for paragraph 4 there was 17 crime reports. 
U odnosu na promatrano trogodišnje razdoblje, za stavak 1. podneseno je 20 kaznenih prijava, za stavak 2. podneseno je 12 kaznenih prijava, za stavak 3. podneseno je pet kaznenih prijava, a za stavak 4. podneseno je 17 kaznenih prijava.
Graph 54 shows the number of legal persons reported for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority, by decision types from public prosecutor's offices. 
U grafikonu 54. prikazan je broj prijavljenih pravnih osoba za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti prema vrstama odluka državnih odvjetništava.
During the observed three- year period, public prosecutor's offices made 49 decisions on rejection of crime reports against legal persons and 5 decisions on accusation against legal persons. 
U promatranom trogodišnjem razdoblju državna odvjetništva donijela su 49 odluka o odbačaju kaznenih prijava protiv pravnih osoba te pet odluka o optuženju pravnih osoba.
Graph 55 shows the number of court decisions as well as decisions types, whence accusation for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority. 
U grafikonu 55. prikazan je broj odluka i vrste odluka sudova u povodu optuženja za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti.
Two legal persons were found responsible for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority. 
Dvije pravne osobe proglašene su odgovornima za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti.
One legal person was found responsible for the criminal offence from paragraph 3 and was fined with 10 000 Kuna's, while other legal person was found responsible for the criminal offence from Paragraph 4 and was fined with 700 000 Kuna's. 
Jedna pravna osoba proglašena je odgovornom za kazneno djelo iz stavka 3. i izrečena joj je novčana kazna od 10 000 kuna, dok je druga pravna osoba proglašena odgovornom za kazneno djelo iz stavka 4. i izrečena joj je novčana kazna od 700 000 kuna.
No legal person was pronounced a measure of confiscation of pecuniary gain. 
Nijednoj pravnoj osobi nije izrečena mjera oduzimanja imovinske koristi.
According to provisions of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, each Member State is obliged to adopt legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offence, the conversion or transfer of property, if the perpetrator knows that such property is the proceeds of crime, when it is done for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property. 
Prema odredbama Konvencije Ujedinjenih naroda protiv korupcije, svaka država potpisnica dužna je poduzeti zakonodavne i druge mjere potrebne kako bi se inkriminiralo kao kazneno djelo konverzija ili prijenos imovine, ako počinitelj zna da ta imovina predstavlja imovinsku korist ostvarenu kaznenim djelom, kad se to čini radi prikrivanja ili lažnog prikazivanja nezakonitog podrijetla te imovine.
According to the Article 6 of the Convention, this criminal offence exist when perpetrator intentionally performs a conversion or transfer of property, knowing that such property is proceeds of crime, for the purpose of concealing or disguising the illicit origin of the property or when he is assisting any person who is involved in the commission of the main criminal offence to evade the legal consequences of his actions; or when he conceals or disguise of the true nature, source, location, disposition, movement, rights with respect to, or ownership of, property, knowing that such property is proceeds of crime. 
Prema članku 6. te konvencije, to kazneno djelo postoji kada počinitelj s namjerom izvrši konverziju ili prijenos imovine za koju se zna da je nezakonit prihod, sa svrhom prikrivanja ili maskiranja nezakonitog podrijetla takve imovine ili pomaganja bilo kojoj osobi uključenoj u izvršenje glavnoga kaznenog djela kako bi izbjegla zakonske posljedice svojih djela ili koja prikriva ili maskira pravu prirodu, podrijetlo, mjesto, raspolaganje, premještanje te postojanje prava odnosno vlasništva na imovinu za koju se zna da predstavlja nezakonit prihod.
This criminal offence is done by the person who in banking, financial or other economic operations, invests, takes over, exchanges or otherwise conceals the true source of money, objects, rights or proprietary benefits which he knows to be originated from or acquired by a criminal offence. 
To kazneno djelo čini ona osoba koja u bankarskome, novčarskome ili drugom poslovanju uloži, preuzme, zamijeni, pretvori ili na drugi način prikrije pravi izvor novca, predmeta, prava ili imovinske koristi za koju zna da je nastala ili je pribavljena kaznenim djelom.
For the existence of the criminal offence of money laundering it is important to prove existence of the so called predicate offence, which is a criminal offence from which „dirty“ money originated. 
Za postojanje kaznenog djela pranja novca bitno je dokazati postojanje tzv. predikatnoga kaznenog djela, dakle kaznenog djela iz kojeg potječe „prljavi” novac.
This criminal offence can be committed also by a negligent form of guilt. 
To kazneno djelo može se počiniti i nehajnim oblikom krivnje.
In paragraph 4 it is regulated that if the perpetrator, when committing a criminal offence from paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article, is negligent towards the fact that the money, items or rights might have been acquired by a criminal offence, will be sanctioned with imprisonment between 3 months and 3 years. 
U stavku 4 određeno je ako počinitelj u slučaju počinjenja djela iz stavaka 1. i 2. tog članka postupa s nehajem glede okolnosti da su novac, predmeti ili prava pribavljeni kaznenim djelom, kaznit će se kaznom zatvora od 3 mjeseca do 3 godine.
Public prosecutor's offices made decisions upon crime reports for 4 108 perpetrators of corruptive criminal offences. 
Državna odvjetništva donijela su odluke u povodu kaznenih prijava za 4 108 počinitelja koruptivnih kaznenih djela.
There were 1 420 persons accused (or 34.6% out of the total number of reported), while 632 of them (44.5% of all accused persons) were convicted. 
Optuženo je 1 420 osoba ili 34,6% od ukupnog broja prijavljenih, a osuđeno njih 632 ili 44,5% od ukupnog broja optuženih osoba.
By analysing the number of reported, accused and convicted persons, by each year of observed period, one could notice the proportionate increase in the number of reports, accusations and convictions for corruptive criminal offences. 
Analizirajući broj prijavljenih, optuženih i osuđenih osoba po godinama promatranog razdoblja, može se zaključiti da je riječ o razmjernom povećanju broja prijava, optuženja i osuda za koruptivna kaznena djela.
During the observed three-year period, public prosecutor's offices rejected 65.7% of crime reports for corruptive criminal offences. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju državna odvjetništva odbacila su 65,7% kaznenih prijava za koruptivna kaznena djela.
For one third of crime reports decision on accusation had been brought, while for 2.9 % of reported persons investigation was terminated. 
Za trećinu prijavljenih osoba donesena je odluka o optuženju, dok je za 2,9 % prijavljenih osoba obustavljena istraga.
The data analysis show that public prosecutor's offices most often made decisions for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority, when committed by official persons, their share being 87.4%. 
Analiza podataka pokazuje da su državna odvjetništva najčešće donosila odluke za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti od strane službene osobe i njihov udio je 87,4%.
Compared to all persons reported for corruptive criminal offences, the share of 9.9% refers to persons reported for criminal offences of accepting ad offering a bribe, while the share of 2.7% refers to other corruptive criminal offences. 
U odnosu na sve prijavljene osobe za koruptivna kaznena djela, udio od 9,9% odnosi se na prijavljene osobe za kaznena djela primanja i davanja mita, dok se udio od 2,7% odnosi na ostala koruptivna kaznena djela.
Lack of suspicion is the most often reason for rejecting a crime report. 
Nedostatna sumnja najčešći je razlog odbačaja kaznenih prijava.
The share of 71.3% of all reasons for rejection of crime report refer to lack of suspicion. 
Udio od 71,3% svih razloga odbačaja kaznenih prijava odnosi se na nedostatnu sumnju.
In 23.9% of cases crime reports were rejected because the behaviour had not been defined as a criminal offence. 
Kaznene prijave odbačene su zbog toga što nema obilježja kaznenog djela u 23,9% slučajeva.
Excluded criminal prosecution had been a reason for rejection of the crime report in 4.4% of cases. 
Isključen kazneni progon bio je razlog odbačaja kaznenih prijava u 4,4% slučajeva.
The number of rejections of crime report due to interest of the defendant or society, as well as due to triviality of the criminal offence (0.4% in total) was negligible. 
Neznatan je broj odbačaja kaznenih prijava zbog svrhovitosti te zbog beznačajnog kaznenoga djela (ukupno 0,4%).
Statistical data show that investigation was terminated most often due to the lack of proof (75.4%), because the behaviour was not defined as a criminal offence (10.0%), excluded guilt (8.2%), and due to excluded criminal prosecution (6.4%). 
Statistički podaci govore o tome da je istraga obustavljana najčešće zbog toga što nema dokaza (75,4%), potom zbog toga što nema obilježja kaznenog djela (10,0%), što je isključena krivnja (8,2%) te zbog toga što je isključen progon (6,4%).
In each year of the observed period, every twelfth investigation had been terminated, compared to all decisions made upon concluded investigation. 
U svakoj pojedinoj godini promatranog razdoblja prosječno je svaka dvanaesta istraga bila obustavljena u odnosu na sve odluke po dovršenoj istrazi.
Looking at indicators on the share of convicted persons in the total number of accused ones, for each year of the reported period, one can conclude there is a proportionate increase in the number of the convicted persons, compared to persons accused for corruptive criminal offences. 
Promatrajući pokazatelje o udjelu osuđenih u ukupnom broju optuženih osoba za svaku pojedinu godinu promatranoga razdoblja, može se zaključiti da je riječ o razmjernom povećanju broja osuđenih osoba u odnosu na optužene osobe za koruptivna kaznena djela.
With regard to all persons accused for corruptive criminal offences, 44.5% of them were convicted. 
U odnosu na sve optužene osobe za koruptivna kaznena djela, njih 44,5% proglašeno je krivima.
Criminal prosecution was terminated for 459 persons (32.3%). 
Kazneni postupak obustavljen je za 459 osoba (32,3%).
Judgements rejecting charges amounted to 162 (11.4%), and judgements of acquittal to 167 (11.8%). 
Odbijajuće su presude 162 (11,4%), a oslobađajućih je presuda 167 (11,8%).
Looking at the number of convictions, by each year of the reported person, it is evident that their share compared to all verdicts for each year, is somewhere between 36.4% and 50.5%. 
Promatrajući broj osuđujućih presuda iz godine u godinu promatranoga razdoblja, njihov udio u odnosu na sve presude za svaku pojedinu godinu kreće se od 36,4% do 50,5%.
With regard to the number of convictions there is a noticeable proportionate increase of the number of convicted persons for corruptive criminal offences. 
U odnosu na broj osuđujućih presuda zamjetno je razmjerno povećanje broja osoba koje su proglašene krivima za koruptivna kaznena djela.
Data indicate that in 2008 there were 168 persons convicted for corruptive criminal offences, 228 persons in 2009, and 236 in 2010. 
Podaci pokazuju da je u 2008. godini bilo osuđeno 168 osoba za koruptivna kaznena djela, u 2009. osuđeno je njih 228, a u 2010. godini 236 osoba.
By analysing types of decisions made by courts whence accusation for corruptive criminal offences, data show that from year to year of observed period the number of terminations of the criminal proceeding is significantly decreasing, while there is also a decrease in the number of judgements of acquittal. 
Analizirajući vrste odluka suda u povodu optuženja za koruptivna kaznena djela, podaci pokazuju da je iz godine u godinu promatranog razdoblja broj obustava kaznenog postupka mnogo manji, a manji je i broj oslobađajućih presuda.
With regard to judgement rejecting charges, in the last year of the observed period (2010) there was a decrease of judgements rejecting charges, compared to the year 2009. 
U odnosu na odbijajuće presude, u posljednoj promatranoj godini (2010.) smanjen je broj odbijajućih presuda u odnosu na 2009.
During the observed three-year period, 81.3% of persons accused for corruptive criminal offences was accused for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority, while 16.8% of persons were accused for criminal offences of accepting and offering a bribe. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju 81,3% optuženih osoba za koruptivna kaznena djela optuženo je za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti, dok je njih 16,8% optuženo za kaznena djela primanja i davanja mita.
Compared to all persons accused for corruptive criminal offences, there is a negligible share of persons accused for other corruptive criminal offences (1.9% of them). 
U odnosu na sve optužene osobe za koruptivna kaznena djela, neznatan je udio onih koji su optuženi za druga koruptivna kaznena djela (njih 1,9%).
During the observed three-year period, 632 persons were convicted for criminal offences. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za koruptivna kaznena djela osuđene su 632 osobe.
There were 232 persons sanctioned with unsuspended imprisonment, while 395 persons had been sanctioned with suspended imprisonment. 
Na bezuvjetnu zatvorsku kaznu osuđene su njih 232, a na uvjetnu kaznu zatvora 395 osoba.
Also 3 unsuspended fines and two educational measured were pronounced. 
Izrečene su tri bezuvjetne novčane kazne te dvije odgojne mjere.
With regard to individual corruptive criminal offences, there is a significantly highest number of persons convicted for the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority (430 of them), than for the criminal offence of offering a bribe (142 of them). 
U odnosu na pojedina koruptivna kaznena djela, najveći je broj osuđenih osoba za kazneno djelo zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti (njih 430), potom za kazneno djelo davanje mita (njih 142).
For the criminal offence of accepting a bribe 50 persons were convicted, while for criminal offences of illegal intercession and abuse in performing governmental duties 5 persons were convicted for each criminal offence. 
Za kazneno djelo primanja mita osuđeno je 50 osoba, a za kaznena djela protuzakonitog posredovanja i zlouporabe obavljanja dužnosti državne vlasti po pet osoba.
With regard to all persons convicted for criminal offences, 68.8 % of them had been convicted for criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority, when committed by an official person, while 30.4% of them were convicted for criminal offences of accepting and offering a bribe. 
U odnosu na sve osuđene osobe za koruptivna kaznena djela, njih 68,8% osuđeno je za kaznena djela zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti od strane službene osobe, dok je njih 30,4% osuđeno za kaznena djela primanja i davanja mita.
During the observed three-year period, 62.5% of all convicted persons were sanctioned to suspended imprisonment. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju na uvjetnu kaznu zatvora osuđeno je 62,5% svih osuđenih osoba.
Unsuspended imprisonment had been pronounced for 36.7% of all persons convicted (for criminal offences of general criminality, the share of unsuspended imprisonment is significantly lower and is around 19%). 
Bezuvjetna zatvorska kazna izrečena je za 36,7% svih osuđenih osoba (za kaznena djela općega kriminaliteta udio bezuvjetne zatvorske kazne mnogo je manji i iznosi oko 19%).
The share of other sanctions pronounced for corruptive criminal offences is negligible (0.8%). 
Udio ostalih sankcija za koruptivna kaznena djela neznatan je (0,8%).
During the observed three-year period, pecuniary gain had been confiscated from 190 persons, due to commitment of corruptive criminal offences. 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za 190 osoba oduzeta je imovinska korist zbog počinjenja koruptivnih kaznenih djela.
Data show that there is a proportionate increase in the number of convicted persons from whom pecuniary gain had been confiscated due to commitment of corruptive criminal offences. 
Podaci pokazuju da je riječ o razmjernom povećanju broja osuđenih osoba kojima je oduzeta imovinska korist zbog počinjenja koruptivnih kaznenih djela.
With regard to perpetrators of the criminal offence of abuse of office and official authority, in 147 cases pecuniary gain had been confiscated. 
U odnosu na počinitelje kaznenog djela zlouporabe položaja i ovlasti, u 147 slučajeva oduzeta je imovinska korist.
With regard to the perpetrators of criminal offences of accepting and offering a bribe, pecuniary gain had been confiscated in 43 cases. 
U odnosu na počinitelje kaznenih djela primanja i davanja mita u 43 slučaja oduzeta je imovinska korist.
By analysing data on the sex structure of persons accused for corruptive criminal offences, during the observed three-year period, we come to indicator showing that the share of 75.6% refers to men, while the share of women is 24.4%. 
Analizirajući podatke o spolnoj strukturi optuženih osoba za koruptivna kaznena djela u promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju dolazi se do pokazatelja o tome da se udio od 75,6% odnosi na muškarce, dok je 24,4% žena.
When comparing these indicators with indicators on sex structure of the perpetrators of general criminality, it is evident that the share for criminal offences of general criminality is 90% men and 10% women. 
Usporedbom tih pokazatelja s pokazateljima spolne strukture počinitelja općega kriminaliteta zamjetno je da kod kaznenih djela općega kriminaliteta taj omjer iznosi 90% za muškarce, a 10% za žene.
During the observed three-year period, 1 420 persons had been accused, out of that 1 073 men (75.6%) and 347 women (24.4%). 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju optuženo je 1.420 osoba, od kojih su 1.073 muškarci (75,6%) i 347 žene (24,4%).
When comparing the share of women population for criminal offences of general criminality with an average share of women around 10%, and the share of women perpetrators of corruptive criminal offences (24.4%), one can conclude that there is a significant share of women perpetrators of corruptive criminal offences. 
Usporedbom udjela ženske populacije za kaznena djela općega kriminaliteta, kod kojih je udio prosječno 10%, te udjela žena kod koruptivnih kaznenih djela (24,4%) može se zaključiti da je znatan udio žena počiniteljica koruptivnih kaznenih djela.
When looking at the age structure, statistical data show that most often perpetrators of corruptive criminal offences are within the age group ranging between 41 and 50 years of age (371 of them), followed by persons within the age group ranging between 31 and 40 year (335 of them). 
Promatrajući dobnu strukturu, statistički podaci pokazuju da su počinitelji koruptivnih kaznenih djela najčešće osobe dobne skupine od 41 do 50 godina (njih 371), potom osobe dobne skupine od 31 do 40 godina (njih 335).
During the observed three-year period, for criminal offences of accepting and offering a bribe 238 persons were accused, of which 215 men (90.3% of them) and 23 women (9.7% of them). 
U promatranome trogodišnjem razdoblju za kaznena djela primanja i davanja mita optuženo je 238 osoba, od kojih je 215 muškaraca (njih 90,3%) i 23 žene (njih 9,7%).