natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A person is considered to have adequate knowledge if he/she has completed graduate studies in the field of economics and related areas, law and related areas and mathematics, physics, information science and related areas, in accordance with the regulations governing scientific activity and high education and recognition of foreign educational qualifications. 
Odgovarajućim stručnim znanjima smatra se najmanje završen diplomski studij iz područja ekonomije i njoj srodnih područja, prava i srodnih područja te matematike, fizike, informatike, elektrotehnike i srodnih područja, u skladu s propisima kojima se uređuje znanstvena djelatnost i visoko obrazovanje te priznavanje inozemnih obrazovnih kvalifikacija.
Adequate experience for a supervisory board member is considered to be: 
Odgovarajućim iskustvom za člana nadzornog odbora smatra se:
five years of consecutive work experience as a management or supervisory board member in a credit institution; 
pet godina kontinuiranog iskustva na poslovima člana uprave ili nadzornog odbora u kreditnoj instituciji,
seven years of consecutive work experience in the following positions: 
sedam godina kontinuiranog iskustva na sljedećim poslovima:
work in a body competent for the supervision of credit or financial institutions; 
rad u tijelu nadležnom za nadzor nad kreditnim ili financijskim institucijama,
experience gained through long-term academic work; 
iskustvo stečeno dugogodišnjim akademskim radom,
experience gained through long-term work in government administration bodies or public authorities in key management positions with a high degree of independence; 
iskustvo stečeno dugogodišnjim radom u tijelima državne uprave ili javnopravnim tijelima na ključnim rukovodećim mjestima s visokim stupnjem samostalnosti,
experience in the management of organisational units of credit or financial institutions key for their business activity; or 
dugogodišnje rukovođenje organizacijskim jedinicama u kreditnim ili financijskim institucijama bitnim za obavljanje njihove djelatnosti,
experience of managing a branch of a credit or financial institution; 
iskustvo rukovođenja podružnicom kreditne ili financijske institucije,
experience as a procurator of advisor to the management board of a credit or a financial institution; or 
iskustvo prokurista ili savjetnika uprave kreditne ili financijske institucije ili
long-term experience in managing the financial affairs in large entrepreneurs determined by accounting regulations. 
dugogodišnje iskustvo u rukovođenju financijskim poslovima u velikim poduzetnicima određenima računovodstvenim propisima.
he/she is not in a conflict of interest in relation to the credit institution, shareholders, supervisory board members, key function holders or senior management of the credit institution; 
3. koja nije u sukobu interesa u odnosu na kreditnu instituciju, dioničare, članove nadzornog odbora, nositelje ključnih funkcija i više rukovodstvo kreditne institucije
A conflict of interest is the situation where private interests of a person are contrary to the interest of a credit institution, particularly where a person's private interest affects or may affect his/her impartialiy in the exercise of his/her duty. 
Sukob interesa okolnosti su kada su privatni interesi osobe u suprotnosti s interesom kreditne institucije, a posebice kada privatni interes osobe utječe ili može utjecati na njezinu nepristranost u obavljanju dužnosti.
A conflict of interest will be deemed to exist: 
Smatra se da postoji sukob interesa:
if a supervisory board member or a person connected with him/her is in a materially significant business relationship with the credit institution; 
ako član nadzornog odbora ili s njim povezana osoba ima značajan poslovni odnos s kreditnom institucijom,
if a supervisory board member is also a member of the supervisory or management board of another credit institution, financial institution, mixed financial holding company or a financial holding which are not a part of the same group of credit institutions to which this particular credit institution belongs; or 
ako je član nadzornog odbora ujedno i član nadzornog odbora ili uprave druge kreditne institucije, financijske institucije, mješovitoga financijskoga holdinga ili financijskog holdinga, a koji nisu dio iste grupe kreditnih institucija kojoj pripada i ta kreditna institucija ili
if other circumstances point to a conflict of interest; 
ako druge okolnosti upućuju na sukob interesa.
he/she may be appointed a member of the supervisory board under the provisions of the Companies Act; 
4. koja može biti član nadzornog odbora prema odredbama Zakona o trgovačkim društvima i
he/she is able to commit sufficient time to perform his/her functions; 
5. koja može posvetiti dovoljno vremena ispunjavanju obveza iz svoje nadležnosti
A supervisory board member may not commit sufficient time to perform his/her functions if he/she simultaneously performs: 
Smatra se da član nadzornog odbora ne može posvetiti dovoljno vremena ispunjavanju obveza iz svoje nadležnosti ako istodobno obnaša:
the function of the chairperson or a management board member of a credit institution and another function of a management board member of some other undertaking or the function of directing the business of some other undertaking; 
funkciju predsjednika ili člana uprave kreditne institucije i još jednu funkciju člana uprave nekoga drugoga trgovačkog društva ili funkciju vođenja javnoga trgovačkog društva ili komanditnog društva,
the function of the management board member and more than two functions of a supervisory board member; or 
funkciju člana uprave i više od dvije funkcije člana nadzornog odbora ili
more than four functions of a supervisory board member. 
više od četiri funkcije člana nadzornog odbora.
One function is considered to be the function of a member of the management or supervisory boards of undertakings within the same group and undertakings in which a credit institution has a qualifying holding while functions in non-profit organisations and supervisory boards, where the person in question represents the Republic of Croatia or some other Member State of the European Union are not taken into account. 
Jednom funkcijom smatraju se funkcije člana uprave ili nadzornog odbora društava unutar iste grupe i društava u kojima kreditna institucija ima kvalificirani udio, a funkcije u neprofitnim organizacijama i u nadzornim odborima kad osoba predstavlja Republiku Hrvatsku ili neku drugu članicu Europske unije ne uzimaju se u obzir.
The credit institution's supervisory board must have at least one independent member. 
Nadzorni odbor kreditne institucije mora imati najmanje jednog neovisnog člana.
A supervisory board member is considered to be independent: 
Smatra se da je član nadzornog odbora neovisan:
if he/she is not a shareholder of the credit institution in question or any of the undertakings connected with it; 
ako nije dioničar te kreditne institucije ni s njom povezanog društva,
if he/she is not a member of the management board of an undertaking which is connected with the credit institution and provided he/she has not held such a position in the last five years; 
ako nije član uprave društva koje je povezano s kreditnom institucijom i ako nije bio na tom položaju u posljednjih pet godina,
if he/she was not a member of the management board or a key function holder in the credit institution in question in the last five years; 
ako u posljednjih pet godina nije bio član uprave ili nositelj ključne funkcije u toj kreditnoj instituciji,
if he/she is not an employee of the undertaking connected with the credit institution or has not been an employee not covered by item 3) of that credit institution or an undertaking connected with the credit institution; 
ako nije zaposlenik društva koje je povezano s kreditnom institucijom ili u posljednje tri godine nije bio zaposlenik koji nije pokriven točkom 3) te kreditne institucije ili s njom povezanog društva,
if he/she, apart from the compensation received for performing the function of a supervisory board member of that credit institution and undertakings connected with the credit institution, does not receive nor has received any material compensation; 
ako osim naknade za obnašanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora od kreditne institucije i s njom povezanih društava ne prima niti je primao značajnu naknadu,
if he/she is not or was not in the last three years a member, partner or employee of an audit firm which provides or has provided audit services to the credit institution or to an undertaking connected with it; 
ako nije ili u posljednje tri godine nije bio član, partner ili zaposlenik revizorskog društva koje pruža ili je pružalo revizorske usluge kreditnoj instituciji ili s njom povezanom društvu,
if he/she is not a member of the management board of another undertaking in which a member of the management board of the credit institution is a member of the supervisory board; 
ako nije član uprave drugog društva u kojem je član uprave kreditne institucije član nadzornog odbora,
if he/she is not connected with members of the management board of the credit institution; and 
ako nije povezan s članovima uprave kreditne institucije i
if he/she has not been a member of the supervisory board of that credit institution for over 12 years. 
ako nije član nadzornog odbora te kreditne institucije više od 12 godina.
Application for prior approval for supervisory board members 
Zahtjev za izdavanje prethodne suglasnosti za obavljanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora
The application for prior approval to perform the function of a member of the supervisory board of a credit institution is to be submitted by the management board of the credit institution (or in the case of establishing a credit institution, its founders) at least three months before expiry of the term of office of an individual member of the supervisory board, for a maximum term of office of four years. 
Zahtjev za izdavanje prethodne suglasnosti za obavljanje funkcije člana nadzornog odbora kreditne institucije podnosi uprava kreditne institucije (odnosno kod osnivanja kreditne institucije njezini osnivači) najmanje tri mjeseca prije isteka mandata pojedinog člana nadzornog odbora, za mandat koji ne može biti duži od četiri godine.
Statement of the Croatian National Bank regarding the issue of foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens in Ljubljanska banka 
Očitovanje Hrvatske narodne banke o problemu devizne štednje hrvatskih građana u Ljubljanskoj banci
The issue of unpaid foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens in the former Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb has again come under the spotlight in connection with the intended entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka or its qualified co-owner into the Croatian banking system. 
U posljednje vrijeme iznova se aktualizira pitanje neisplaćene devizne štednje hrvatskih građana u nekadašnjoj Glavnoj filijali Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana, a vezano za željeni ulazak Nove Ljubljanske banke ili njenog kvalificiranog suvlasnika u hrvatski bankovni sustav.
This, as the Croatian National Bank has stated previously, is unacceptable, until at least resolution is found to the issue of that part of debts of Ljubljanska banka to Croatian citizens which involves the so-called untransferred foreign currency savings. 
Kao što je poznato, Hrvatska narodna banka smatra da je to neprihvatljivo, dok se ne riješi barem onaj dio dugovanja Ljubljanske banke hrvatskim građanima koji se odnosi na tzv. neprenesenu deviznu štednju.
The Slovene side would not accept such an option in the past. 
Slovenska strana to u proteklom razdoblju nije prihvaćala.
In defending their rejective position, some Slovene officials have gone so far as to ignore or distort irrefutable facts, or even, as we witnessed in the last few days the attempts of Slovene individuals in prominent positions, to threat to block Croatia's entry into the European Union (which, as the latest news suggest, has been denied) or to dismiss Croatia on the basis of offensive disqualifications. 
Obrazlažući svoj odbijajući stav, pojedini slovenski dužnosnici nisu prezali ni od ignoriranja ili čak izvrtanja nepobitnih činjenica, a posljednjih dana pojedinci na istaknutim pozicijama nisu se suzdržavali čak ni od prijetnji blokadom Hrvatske na putu u Europsku uniju (što je, prema najnovijim vijestima, ipak opovrgnuto), pa čak i od uvredljivih diskvalifikacija.
In view of this situation, it is worth underlining some of the key Slovene positions regarding this issue and examine the extent of their "foundation in facts", leaving aside at this point the contradictory nature of some of them. 
Vrijedi stoga podsjetiti na neke od osnovnih slovenskih teza koje se plasiraju oko ovog slučaja i osvrnuti se na njihovu "utemeljenost", ostavljajući ovom prigodom po strani i međusobnu kontradiktornost nekih od njih.
The branch office acts for the account of its parent bank while the parent bank guarantees for the liabilities of its branch with its entire assets, without limitation (which is not a feature specific of Croatia only but an international standard applied throughout Europe). 
Filijala posluje za račun matične banke, a matična banka jamči za njene obveze cjelokupnom svojom imovinom, bez ograničenja (što nije nikakav ovdašnji specifikum, već međunarodni standard, koji vrijedi i svuda u Europi).
This means that depositors of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, which had no legal personality, were and remained in a contractual relation with the parent Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana. 
To ujedno znači da su i štediše Glavne filijale Zagreb, koja nije imala status pravne osobe, bili i ostali u ugovornom odnosu s matičnom Ljubljanskom bankom d.d. Ljubljana.
Position 2 - The obligations of Ljubljanska banka terminated with Yugoslavia's dissolution, depositors' foreign currency savings had been guaranteed by the former Yugoslavia, and Nova Ljubljanska banka has nothing to do with Ljubljanska banka. 
2. teza - Raspadom Jugoslavije obveza Ljubljanske banke je prestala, štedišama je za deviznu štednju jamčila bivša federacije, a Nova Ljubljanska banka nema nikakve veze s Ljubljanskom bankom.
Deposit guarantees are activated (again, not something specific to this case only) when a bank goes into bankruptcy, which was not the case with Ljubljanska banka. 
Jamstvo za štednju aktivira se (što također nije nikakva ovdašnja posebnost) kad banka završi u stečaju, što kod Ljubljanske banke nije bio slučaj.
This bank continued to operate under the same name for several years after the break-up of the former Yugoslavia and was later transformed to Nova Ljubljanska banka. 
Ona je još nekoliko godina nakon raspada bivše federacije redovno poslovala pod istim imenom, a zatim je pretvorena u Novu Ljubljansku banku.
This was done after courts, both in and outside Slovenia, started ruling in favour of the first depositors who initiated court proceedings to retrieve their savings. 
To je učinjeno nakon što su sudovi i u Sloveniji i izvan nje počeli donositi presude u korist štediša koji su prvi pokrenuli sudske postupke da bi došli do svojih štednih uloga.
Evidently, the purpose of this transformation was to help Nova Ljubljanska banka to rid itself of the obligations of its predecessor towards depositors outside Slovenia. 
Takav potez realiziran je s evidentnom namjerom da se Nova Ljubljanska banka otarasi obveza svoje prethodnice prema štedišama izvan Slovenije.
In this "transformation" Nova Ljubljanska banka took over practically the entire assets of Ljubljanska banka, including, naturally, all its depositors in Slovenia. 
U toj "pretvorbi" Nova Ljubljanska banka preuzela je praktički sveukupnu imovinu Ljubljanske banke, a naravno i sve njene štediše u Sloveniji.
Moreover, the July 1994 Constitutional Act, on which this operation was based, made it impossible for non-Slovene depositors to collect their claims on the basis of court decisions. 
Štoviše, Ustavnim zakonom iz srpnja 1994. godine, na kojemu se ta operacija zasnivala, ne-slovenskim štedišama je onemogućeno da naplate svoja potraživanja temeljem sudskih rješenja.
Position 3 - The obligations of Ljubljanska banka towards Croatian depositors would already have been settled had it not been for the Croatian National Bank which made the operations of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, or the entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka impossible. 
3. teza - Obveze Ljubljanske banke prema hrvatskim štedišama već bi bile izmirene da Hrvatska narodna banka nije "onemogućila poslovanje zagrebačkoj filijali" odnosno ulazak Novoj Ljubljanskoj banci.
However, the facts speak of the opposite. 
Činjenice govore nešto sasvim drugo.
This was never done. 
To, međutim, nikad nije učinjeno.
Instead of the recapitalisation of the branch office by its parent bank, it has been suggested that Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb be recapitalised largely by funding from the Croatian Fund for Development. 
Umjesto da ju dokapitalizira matična banka, predloženo je da se zagrebačka filijala Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana dokapitalizira najvećim dijelom sredstvima - Hrvatskog fonda za razvoj.
Obviously, the Croatian side was not interested in this model of revitalisation of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb. 
Iz razumljivih razloga, za takav model osposobljavanja Glavne filijale Zagreb Ljubljanske banke d.d. hrvatska strana nije imala interesa.
As a token of its good will, however, and confident that the parent bank will ultimately find a mutually acceptable resolution, the Croatian National Bank tolerated some degree of operations of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb for a number of years. 
No, u znak dobro volje i u uvjerenju da će matična banka ipak iznaći neko obostrano prihvatljivo rješenje, zagrebačkoj filijali je Hrvatska narodna banka još godinama tolerirala određeni opseg poslovanja.
More specifically, it allowed the bank to perform domestic payment system services in connection with collection of its claims and servicing of its liabilities. 
Preciznije rečeno, dopušteni su joj poslovi domaćeg platnog prometa za potrebe naplate njenih potraživanja i izvršavanja njenih obveza.
This was not done and now repayment of savings is made conditional upon previous, direct or indirect, entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka into the Croatian financial market. 
To nije učinjeno, ali se sad isplata štednje uvjetuje prethodnim, izravnim ili posrednim, ulaskom Nove Ljubljanske banke na hrvatsko financijsko tržište.
It is worth mentioning here that Bosnia and Herzegovina permitted the entry of Nova Ljubljanska banka into the country's banking system, but obligations towards depositors have nonetheless remained unsettled. 
Uzgred rečeno, u Bosni i Hercegovini omogućen je ulazak Nove Ljubljanske banke u bankovni sustav, ali obveze prema štedišama ipak nisu izmirene.
Position 4 - By permitting its citizens to transfer their savings from the branch offices of banks with a head office registered outside Croatia to the Croatian banks, the Republic of Croatia has assumed an obligation to all depositors, including to those who still have valid savings books of Ljubljanska banka. 
4. teza - Omogućivši svojim građanima da prenesu svoju štednju iz filijala banaka sa sjedištem izvan Hrvatske u ovdašnje banke, Republika Hrvatska preuzela je na sebe obvezu prema svim štedišama, pa i onima koji još imaju važeće štedne knjižice Ljubljanske banke.
After gaining autonomy, the Republic of Croatia permitted its citizens, with an aim of gaining the citizens' confidence in its banking system, to choose either to remain in a direct contractual relationship, under private law, with banks outside the territory of Croatia or to transfer their claims to the Republic of Croatia which would in turn guarantee a gradual repayment of savings over a ten-year period. 
Republika Hrvatska je nakon osamostaljenja - u cilju izgradnje povjerenja građana u svoj bankovni sustav - omogućila svojim građanima da izaberu hoće li ostati u izravnom privatno-pravnom ugovornom odnosu s bankama sa sjedištem izvan Hrvatske ili će svoja potraživanja prepustiti Republici Hrvatskoj, a ona će im jamčiti postupnu isplatu štednje tijekom deset godina.
Approximately two-thirds of the total foreign currency savings in Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb were transferred and about one-third of depositors believed that they would obtain their money in a much faster and easier way if they retained their valid savings books of Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana. 
Otprilike dvije trećine štednje od ukupne devizne štednje u Glavnoj filijali Zagreb je preneseno, a vlasnici približno jedne trećine štednje vjerovali su da će lakše i brže do svog novca ako u svojim rukama zadrže važeće štedne knjižice Ljubljanske banke d.d. Ljubljana.
Consequently, according to the available data, the Croatian citizens have a direct claim of about DEM 312 million of principal plus interest, on the basis of untransferred savings in Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb, while the claim of the Croatian government for the repaid transferred savings is almost double. 
Dakle, temeljem neprenesene štednje u zagrebačkoj filijali Ljubljanske banke hrvatski građani izravno potražuju prema raspoloživim podacima oko 312 milijuna DEM glavnice plus kamate, a hrvatska država još gotovo dvaput toliko za isplaćenu prenesenu štednju.
Position 5 - Slovenia did not benefit from the branch offices of Ljubljanska banka in Croatia, so why expect Slovenia to have any obligations to their depositors? 
5. teza - Slovenija nije imala nikakve koristi od poslovnica Ljubljanske banke u Hrvatskoj, pa zašto bi onda imala i obveze prema njihovim štedišama.
No person has ever founded a bank to benefit the local population and enterprises, but for its own business interests, which was also the case with Ljubljanska banka. 
Nitko nikad nije otvarao banke iz dobročinstva prema lokalnom stanovništvu i poduzećima, već zbog vlastitih poslovnih interesa, pa tako i Ljubljanska banka.
The available data show that the total amount of foreign currency savings deposited by all banks from Slovenia (including Ljubljanska banka system in Slovenia and other banks) with the National Bank of Yugoslavia exceeded by only about twenty percent the deposited amount originating from foreign currency savings with Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb. 
Raspoloživi podaci pokazuju da je ukupni iznos devizne štednje koji su sve banke iz Slovenije (dakle i cijeli tamošnji sustav Ljubljanske banke i ostale) deponirale kod Narodne banke Jugoslavije bio samo za dvadesetak posto veći od iznosa deponiranog iz same zagrebačke podružnice Ljubljanske banke.
Position 6 - The dinar amounts provided by the National Bank of Yugoslavia to Ljubljanska banka d.d., Ljubljana in the form of interest-free loans, in exchange for the foreign currency savings of Croatian citizens, have been used for extending loans to Croatian companies through Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana - Main Branch Office Zagreb. 
6. teza - Dinarima koje je Ljubljanska banka d.d. Ljubljana dobila u obliku beskamatnog kredita od Narodne banke Jugoslavije, kao protuvrijednost za deponiranu deviznu štednju prikupljenu od hrvatskih građana, kreditirane su putem zagrebačke filijale hrvatske tvrtke.
It is neither depositors' concern nor can they have any influence on a bank's decisions as to whom it will provide loans from its funds. 
Štediša se ne tiče niti imaju ikakvog utjecaja na odluke banke koga će kreditirati raspoloživim sredstvima.
It is therefore inconceivable that in any civilized country in the world the liabilities of a bank to its depositors would be challenged on the grounds that their money has been used for financing a loan to a company which has failed to repay it. 
Stoga je nezamislivo bilo gdje u civiliziranom svijetu da se obveza banke prema svom štediši osporava tvrdnjom da je njegovim novcem kreditirana neka tvrtka od koje nije naplaćen dug.