natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
38 The Greek Government states that the infringement procedure for failure to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 began on 11 October 1993 when the Commission, having received no information regarding compliance with that judgment, wrote to the Greek authorities reminding them that the Court had found against the Hellenic Republic and setting a time-limit for communication by them of the measures taken to comply with the Court's ruling. 
38 Postupak zbog neizvršavanja navedene presude Komisija/Grčka počeo je 11. listopada 1993. kada se Komisija, nakon što nije zaprimila informacije o izvršenju predmetne presude, obratila grčkim tijelima podsjećajući ih na kaznu Helenskoj Republici sadržanu u toj presudi i odredivši rok u kojem one Sudu trebaju dostaviti obavijest o poduzetim mjerama za postupanje u skladu s tom presudom.
39 The Greek Government argues that, although it relates to the future and not to the past and does not apply retroactively, the fine contains retroactive elements. 
39 Grčka vlada tvrdi da, iako se odnosi na budućnost, a ne na prošlost, te se ne primjenjuje retroaktivno, kazna sadrži retroaktivne elemente.
The procedure under Article 171(2) of the Treaty essentially involves consideration of the past and the fine is calculated on the basis of factors and criteria referring to acts carried out in the past. 
Postupak na temelju članka 171. stavka 2. Ugovora u biti podrazumijeva da se prošlost uzima u obzir a kazna se izračunava na temelju elemenata i kriterija koji se odnose na postupke iz prošlosti.
The Commission seeks to penalise past conduct while pursuing the longer-term objective of avoiding future reoffending by the undisciplined Member State. 
Komisija pokušava kažnjavanjem prošlih postupaka ostvariti dugoročni cilj, a to je da u slučaju „nedisciplinirane" države članice u budućnosti ne dođe do „recidiva".
40 The Commission contends that Article 171(2) of the Treaty is not being applied retroactively. 
40 Komisija odgovara da se članak 171. stavak 2. Ugovora ne primjenjuje retroaktivno.
The present action can be distinguished from Commission v France, cited above, since here all the stages of the infringement procedure have taken place after the Treaty on European Union entered into force. 
Ova se tužba razlikuje od prije navedenog predmeta Komisija/Francuska, budući da su se u ovom slučaju sve faze postupka pokrenutog zbog povrede obveze odvijale nakon što je stupio na snagu Ugovor o Europskoj uniji.
41 Nor are the penalties being applied retroactively. 
41 Kazne se također ne primjenjuju retroaktivno.
The penalty payment proposed by the Commission cannot be considered to be a penal sanction, because it is imposed to influence future conduct. 
Novčana kazna koju je Komisija predložila ne može se smatrati kaznenom sankcijom jer je naložena kako bi utjecala na buduće ponašanje.
42 On this issue, it is sufficient to note, first, that all the stages of the pre-litigation procedure, including the letter of formal notice of 21 September 1995, occurred after the Treaty on European Union entered into force. 
42 U tom je pogledu, kao prvo, dovoljno napomenuti da su se sve faze predsudskog postupka, a posebno pismo opomene od 21. rujna 1995., odvijale prije nego što je Ugovor o Europskoj uniji stupio na snagu.
The letter of 11 October 1993 to which the Greek Government refers does not form part of that procedure. 
U stvari, dopis od 11. listopada 1993. na koji se poziva grčka vlada nije dio navedenog postupka.
Second, the argument put forward by the Greek Government concerning the relevance, when setting the penalty payment, of factors and criteria relating to the past is indissociable from consideration of the substance of the case, in particular as regards the object of penalty payments under Article 171(2) of the Treaty. 
Drugo, argument koji je istaknula grčka vlada u pogledu uzimanja u obzir elemenata i kriterija koji se odnose na prošlost kod određivanja novčane kazne podudara se u biti s ispitivanjem merituma spora, a posebno cilja kazne iz članka 171. stavka 2. Ugovora.
43 Accordingly, the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Greek Government must be rejected. 
43 U tim okolnostima valja odbiti prigovor nedopuštenosti koji je podnijela grčka vlada.
44 A preliminary point to be considered is whether the obligations which the Hellenic Republic owed under Articles 4 and 6 of Directive 75/442 and Articles 5 and 12 of Directive 78/319 still apply as Community law now stands. 
44 Najprije valja razmotriti postoje li još uvijek obveze Helenske Republike na temelju članaka 4. i 6. Direktive 75/442 i članaka 5. i 12. Direktive 78/319 s obzirom na trenutačno stanje prava Zajednice.
45 Directive 75/442 was substantially amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991 (OJ 1991 L 78, p. 32). 
45 U tom pogledu valja napomenuti da je Direktiva 75/442 znatno izmijenjena Direktivom Vijeća 91/156/EEZ od 18. ožujka 1991. (SL L 78, str. 32.).
The effect of Article 1 of Directive 91/156 is that Articles 1 to 12 of Directive 75/442 have been replaced by Articles 1 to 18 and three annexes have been added. 
Iz članka 1. Direktive 91/156 u stvari proizlazi da su članci 1. do 12. Direktive 75/442 zamijenjeni člancima 1. do 18. te da su dodana tri priloga.
46 Directive 78/319 was repealed with effect from 12 December 1993 and replaced by Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste (OJ 1993 L 377, p. 20). 
46 Direktiva 78/319 stavljena je izvan snage s učinkom od 12. prosinca 1993. i zamijenjena Direktivom Vijeća 91/689/EEZ od 12. prosinca 1991. o opasnom otpadu (SL L 377, str. 20.).
Council Directive 94/31/EC of 27 June 1994 amending Directive 91/689 (OJ 1994 L 168, p. 28) postponed the repeal of Directive 78/319 to 27 June 1995. 
Direktivom Vijeća 94/31/EZ od 27. lipnja 1994. o izmjeni Direktive 91/689 (SL L 168, str. 28.) odgođeno je stavljanje izvan snage Direktive 78/319 do 27. lipnja 1995.
47 Comparative study of the abovementioned provisions shows that the amended directive tightened up certain provisions of Directive 75/442 (Case C-365/97 Commission v Italy [1999] ECR I-7773, paragraph 37). 
47 Iz usporednog ispitivanja navedenih odredbi proizlazi da je Direktiva 75/442, kako je izmijenjena, postrožila određene odredbe Direktive 75/442 (presuda od 9. studenoga 1999., Komisija/Italija, C-365/96, Zb., str. I-7773., t. 37.).
Thus, the obligations imposed on the Member States by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 remain applicable by virtue of the first paragraph of Article 4 of the amended directive (Commission v Italy, paragraph 61). 
Zbog toga se obveze država članica predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i dalje primjenjuju na temelju članka 4. stavka 1. Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena (gore navedena presuda od 9. studenoga 1999., Komisija/Italija, t. 61.)
The obligation laid down in Article 6 of Directive 75/442 to draw up waste disposal plans corresponds now to the obligation under Article 7 of the amended directive to draw up waste management plans. 
Obveza predviđena člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 o izradi planova zbrinjavanja otpada sada odgovara obvezi iz članka 7. Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena, o izradi planova gospodarenja otpadom.
48 Similarly, the obligations imposed on the Member States by Article 5 of Directive 78/319 are retained by virtue of Article 4 of Directive 75/442, as amended. 
48 Na sličan način, obveze država članica predviđene člankom 5. Direktive 78/319 zadržavaju se na temelju članka 4. Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena.
First, the obligation under Article 5(1) of Directive 78/319 to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste without endangering human health or harming the environment now appears in the first paragraph of Article 4 of Directive 75/442, as amended, that directive having been rendered applicable to hazardous waste by Article 1(2) of Directive 91/689. 
Prvo, obveza zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu, koja proizlazi iz članka 5. stavka 1. Direktive 78/319, sada se pojavljuje u članku 4. stavku 1. Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena, koja se primjenjuje na opasni otpad na temelju članka 1. stavka 2. Direktive 91/689.
49 Second, Article 5(2) of Directive 78/319 imposed a specific obligation on the Member States to take the necessary steps to prohibit the abandonment and uncontrolled discharge, tipping or carriage of toxic and dangerous waste, as well as its consignment to installations, establishments or undertakings other than those referred to in Article 9(1) of the directive. 
49 Kao drugo, članak 5. stavak 2. Direktive 78/319 predviđa preciznu obvezu prema kojoj države članice trebaju poduzeti mjere potrebne za zabranu ostavljanja, nekontroliranog odlaganja ili prijevoza toksičnog i opasnog otpada, kao i pohranjivanje otpada u postrojenjima, ustanovama ili poduzećima koja nisu ona predviđena u članku 9. stavku 1. te direktive.
That obligation now appears in the second paragraph of Article 4 of Directive 75/442, as amended. 
Ta se obveza sada pojavljuje u članku 4. stavku 2. Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena.
50 As regards the obligation laid down in Article 12 of Directive 78/319 to draw up, and keep up to date, plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste, that obligation corresponds to the obligation to draw up plans for the management of hazardous waste, imposed by Article 6(1) of Directive 91/689. 
50 S obzirom na obvezu izrade i ažuriranja planova zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđenu člankom 12. Direktive 78/319, ta obveza odgovara obvezi izrade planova gospodarenja opasnim otpadom predviđenoj člankom 6. stavkom 1. Direktive 91/689.
51 It follows from the foregoing that the obligations owed by the Hellenic Republic under Articles 4 and 6 of Directive 75/442 and Articles 5 and 12 of Directive 78/319 still apply as Community law now stands. 
51 Iz gore navedenog proizlazi da se obveze Helenske Republike na temelju članaka 4. i 6. Direktive 75/442 i članaka 5. i 12. Direktive 78/319 još uvijek primjenjuju s obzirom na trenutačno stanje prava Zajednice.
Scope of the obligations found not to have been fulfilled in the judgment in Case C-45/91 
Opseg obveza za koje je utvrđena povreda u presudi C-45/91
52 The Commission maintains that the Hellenic Republic would have satisfied its obligation under Article 171 of the Treaty to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 had it drawn up and implemented the plans prescribed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319. 
52 Komisija smatra da bi Helenska Republika bila ispunila obvezu izvršenja navedene presude Komisija/Grčka iz članka 171. Ugovora da je izradila i provela planove i programe propisane člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319.
In its submission, the obligations flowing from Articles 4 and 6 of Directive 75/442 and Articles 5 and 12 of Directive 78/319 are fulfilled only if the plans prescribed by those directives are adopted and actually implemented. 
Prema stajalištu Komisije, obveze koje proizlaze iz članaka 4. i 6. Direktive 75/442 i članaka 5. i 12. Direktive 78/319 ispunjene su samo ako su planovi i programi propisani tim direktivama doneseni i stvarno provedeni. 53 Iz informacija koje je dostavila grčka vlada proizlazi da je plan zbrinjavanja otpada predviđen člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i program zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđen člankom 12.
53 It states that it is clear from the information provided by the Greek Government that the waste disposal plan required by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and the plan for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste required by Article 12 of Directive 78/319 were still at a preliminary stage and that the river Kouroupitos continued to serve as a site for the uncontrolled disposal of waste from the Chania area. 
Direktive 78/319 još uvijek u preliminarnoj fazi te da rijeka Kouroupitos još uvijek služi kao lokacija za nekontrolirano odlaganje otpada iz prefekture Chania.
54 The Greek Government points out that a Member State might very well have drawn up and notified to the Commission the plans prescribed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 without, however, having taken the necessary measures required by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319. 
54 Grčka vlada ističe da je neka država članica mogla izraditi planove i programe predviđene člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319 te o njima obavijestiti Komisiju bez da je, međutim, poduzela potrebne mjere predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 5. Direktive 78/319.
Conversely, a Member State could have taken the necessary measures required by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319 without having drawn up and given notification of the plans prescribed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319, in which case the failure to fulfil obligations would relate solely to the latter provisions. 
Suprotno tome, država članica mogla je poduzeti potrebne mjere predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 5. Direktive 78/319, a da nije izradila planove i programe propisane člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319. te da nije o njima obavijestila Komisiju, u kojem bi se slučaju povreda obveza odnosila samo na te posljednje odredbe.
55 It should be noted that, whilst Article 4 of Directive 75/442 did not specify the actual content of the measures to be taken in order to ensure that waste is disposed of without endangering human health and without harming the environment, it was none the less binding on the Member States as to the objective to be achieved, while leaving to them a margin of discretion in assessing the need for such measures (Commission v Italy, cited above, paragraph 67). 
55 Valja istaknuti da iako članak 4. Direktive 75/442 nije precizirao stvarni sadržaj mjera koje se trebaju poduzeti kako bi se osiguralo da se otpad zbrinjava na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu, on je ipak obvezivao države članice u pogledu cilja koji se treba postići, ostavljajući im diskrecijske ovlasti u procjeni potrebe za takvim mjerama (gore navedena presuda od 9. studenoga, Komisija/Italija, t. 67.).
56 Thus the Court has held that a significant deterioration in the environment over a protracted period when no action has been taken by the competent authorities is in principle an indication that the Member State concerned has exceeded the discretion conferred on it by that provision (Commission v Italy, paragraph 68). 
56 Zbog toga Sud tvrdi da znatno pogoršanje stanja okoliša tijekom produljenog razdoblja za vrijeme kojeg nadležna tijela nisu poduzela nikakve mjere, u načelu predstavlja naznaku da je država članica na koju se to odnosi prekoračila diskrecijske ovlasti koje su joj dodijeljene tom odredbom (gore navedena presuda od 9. studenoga, Komisija/Italija, t. 68.).
57 The same analysis can be made as regards Article 5 of Directive 78/319. 
57 Jednaka se analiza može izvesti u pogledu članka 5. Direktive 78/319.
58 In addition, the obligations flowing from Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319 were independent of the more specific obligations contained in Articles 5 to 11 of Directive 75/442 concerning the planning, organisation and supervision of waste disposal operations and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 concerning the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste. 
58 Nadalje valja utvrditi da su obveze koje proizlaze iz članka 4. Direktive 75/442 i članka 5. Direktive 78/319 neovisne u odnosu na detaljnije obveze sadržane u odredbama članaka 5. do 11. Direktive 75/442 o planiranju, organizaciji i nadzoru postupaka zbrinjavanja otpada kao i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 o zbrinjavanju toksičnog i opasnog otpada.
The same is true of the corresponding obligations under Directive 75/442 as amended and Directive 91/689. 
Jednako vrijedi i za odgovarajuće obveze na temelju Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena, te Direktive 91/689.
59 Accordingly, in order to determine whether the Hellenic Republic has satisfied the obligation to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91, it must be established in turn whether each of the obligations found by that judgment not to have been fulfilled has, in so far as those obligations are mutually independent, since been complied with. 
59 Prema tome, kako bi se utvrdilo je li Helenska Republika ispunila obvezu postupanja u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka, valja utvrditi sukcesivno je li ispunjena svaka pojedinačna obveza iz navedene presude za koju je utvrđena povreda u mjeri u kojoj su te obveze međusobno neovisne.
Compliance with the obligations flowing from Article 171(1) of the Treaty 
Poštovanje obveza koje proizlaze iz članka 171. stavka 1. Ugovora
60 The Greek Government argues in defence that the volume of waste which continues to be tipped in the Kouroupitos ravine has decreased significantly because some of the waste is landfilled at appropriate sites located in four sub-prefectures of the prefecture of Chania (Sfakia, Kalives, Selino and Kissamo) and a paper sorting and recycling system has been set up. 
60 Grčka vlada u svojoj obrani tvrdi da se obujam otpada koji se i dalje odbacuje u klanac rijeke Kouroupitos znatno smanjio jer se jedan dio otpada odlaže na odgovarajuće lokacije smještene u četiri okruga prefekture Chania (Sfakia, Kalives, Selino i Kissamo) i jer je uveden sustav odvajanja i recikliranja papira.
61 Toxic and hazardous waste from the American military base at Souda has not been deposited in the Kouroupitos ravine since 1996, but is entrusted to a private undertaking which transports it abroad in order for it to be treated. 
61 Toksičan i opasan otpad iz američke vojne baze Souda ne odlaže se u klanac rijeke Kouroupitos od 1996., već je povjeren privatnom poduzeću koje ga prevozi na obradu u inozemstvo.
That is also the case with hospital waste, which is loaded into a special vehicle and stored in a cold chamber until it is incinerated. 
Jednako se postupa i s bolničkim otpadom koji se utovaruje na posebno vozilo i skladišti u hladnoj komori do spaljivanja pirolizom.
As for sediments of hydrocarbons, the Greek Government affirms that they are stored in an appropriate place until they are sent abroad. 
Što se tiče naslaga ugljikovodika, grčka vlada uvjerava da se one skladište na odgovarajuće mjesto dok ne budu poslane u inozemstvo.
Used mineral oils are passed to the Chania prefectorial authorities for transportation to a reclamation plant, while tankers no longer deposit the contents of septic tanks into the Kouroupitos as a biological sewage treatment plant has been built in the Chania area. 
Korištena mineralna ulja prosljeđuju se upravnim tijelima prefekture Chania radi prijevoza do postrojenja za regeneraciju, dok cisterne više ne ispuštaju sadržaj septičkih jama u rijeku Kouroupitos budući da je u prefekturi Chania izgrađeno postrojenje za biološku obradu kanalizacijskog otpada.
62 It should be remembered that the present proceedings stem from a complaint received by the Commission on 22 September 1987, drawing its attention to uncontrolled waste disposal in the mouth of the river Kouroupitos, on the Akrotiri peninsula, by the majority of the municipalities in the prefecture of Chania. 
62 U tom pogledu prvenstveno valja podsjetiti da ovaj postupak proizlazi iz prigovora koji je Komisiji 22. rujna 1987. uputila većina općina u prefekturi Chania, skrećući pozornost na nekontrolirano odlaganje otpada na ušću rijeke Kouroupitos, na poluotoku Akrotiri.
The waste included refuse from military bases in the area, hospitals and clinics, and residues from salt factories, poultry farms, slaughterhouses and all the industrial sites in the area. 
Taj otpad sadržava otpad iz vojnih baza na tom području, bolnica i klinika te otpad iz tvornica soli, peradarskih farmi, klaonica i svih industrijskih postrojenja iz tog područja.
63 In a study produced to the Court by the Greek Government entitled Environmental Impact of Uncontrolled Solid Waste Combustion in the Kouroupitos Ravine, Crete, which was carried out in June 1996 by the Laboratory of Environmental Engineering and Management of the Technical University of Crete, in collaboration with the Institute of Ecological Chemistry, Munich, it is stated: 
63 U studiji koju je u lipnju 1996. proveo Laboratorij za tehnologiju i upravljanje okolišem Tehničkog fakulteta na Kreti u suradnji s Institutom za ekološku kemiju iz Münchena pod nazivom „Učinak na okoliš nekontroliranog izgaranja krutog otpada u klancu rijeke Kouroupitosa na Kreti", a koju je grčka vlada predočila Sudu, navodi se: „[...]
... The solid wastes are disposed of in the Kouroupitos ravine located approximately 30 km east of Chania, on the Akrotiri peninsula. 
Krupni se otpad odlaže u klancu rijeke Kouroupitos koji je smješten otprilike 30 kilometara istočno od Chanie, na poluotoku Akrotiri.
The wastes are dumped into the ravine from the top at a distance of 200 m from the sea without any other care. 
Otpad se baca u klanac s njegova vrha na udaljenosti od 200 metara od mora bez ikakvih mjera opreza.
The wastes have been uncontrollably burning for at least 10 years, while the burning is self-supporting due to the high levels of organic matter. 
Otpad nekontrolirano izgara već najmanje posljednjih 10 godina, a zbog visokih razina organske tvari radi se o procesu samostalnog izgaranja.
The improper waste disposal combined with the uncontrolled burning of the solid wastes has resulted in an environmentally hazardous situation, with the leachate seeping into the [sea], and the products of the burning process being transferred both to land and sea. 
Takvo neprimjereno odlaganje otpada u kombinaciji s nekontroliranim izgaranjem krutog otpada dovelo je do situacije koja je opasna po okoliš jer procjedne vode cure u [more], a produkti procesa izgaranja šire se na tlo i u more."
64 As regards, first, fulfilment of the obligation imposed by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 to dispose of waste without endangering human health and without harming the environment, the Greek Government does not dispute that solid waste, in particular household refuse, is still tipped into the river Kouroupitos. 
64 Prvo, u pogledu ispunjavanja obveze zbrinjavanja otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442, grčka vlada ne osporava da se krupni otpad, a posebno otpad iz kućanstava, još uvijek odlaže u rijeku Kouroupitos.
65 It is clear from the letters from the Prefecture of Chania to the Ministry of the Environment of 7 May and 18 August 1998, disclosed by the Greek Government, that most of the waste still ends up, in the same uncontrolled and unlawful manner, in the Kouroupitos ravine, which today receives all the household waste from the urban area of Chania. 
65 Iz dopisa koji su iz prefekture Chania 7. svibnja i 18. kolovoza 1998. poslani Ministarstvu okoliša i o kojima je grčka vlada izdala obavijest jasno je da većina otpada još uvijek na nekontrolirani i nezakonit način završava u klancu rijeke Kouroupitos koji danas prima sav otpad iz kućanstava gradskog područja Chanie.
66 The Greek Government concedes in its rejoinder that in any event, only the definitive solution to the problem, that is to say discontinuing the operation at the river Kouroupitos and introducing a modern, lawful and effective system, could be regarded as fully satisfactory. 
66 Grčka vlada u svojem odgovoru na repliku priznaje da se „u svakom slučaju samo konačno rješenje problema, a to je zaustavljanje radnji na rijeci Kouroupitos i uvođenje modernog, zakonitog i učinkovitog sustava, može smatrati u potpunosti zadovoljavajućim".
67 Moreover, it is apparent from paragraph 10 of the judgment in Case C-45/91 that the Greek Government had stated on 15 March 1988 in reply to the Commission that it was going to put an end to the operation of that tip after August 1988 and create new disposal sites. 
67 Štoviše, iz točke 10. gore navedene presude Komisija/Grčka proizlazi da je grčka vlada već u odgovoru Komisiji od 15. ožujka 1988. izjavila da namjerava zaustaviti odlaganje na tom odlagalištu nakon kolovoza 1988. i otvoriti nova odlagališta otpada.
68 The fact remains that that has still not been done. 
68 Valja utvrditi da to još uvijek nije učinjeno.