natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(1) A court of second instance shall review a judgement in relation to such part thereof as is challenged by appeal and on the grounds and for the reasons stated by the appellant in the appeal. 
(1) Drugostupanjski sud ispituje presudu u onom dijelu u kojem se pobija žalbom i to iz osnova i razloga koje žalitelj navodi u žalbi.
In respect of such part of the judgement as is reviewed on appeal the court shall also review of its own motion whether the judgement violates to the disadvantage of the defendant any provision of substantive misdemeanour law and whether the statute of limitations for misdemeanour prosecution has expired. 
U dijelu u kojemu po žalbi ispituje presudu, sud po službenoj dužnosti ispituje i jesu li presudom na štetu okrivljenika povrijeđene odredbe prekršajnog materijalnog prava i je li u postupku nastupila zastara prekršajnog progona.
(2) Upon appeal by the prosecutor, a first-instance judgement may be set aside or amended also to the advantage of the defendant. 
(2) U povodu žalbe tužitelja može se prvostupanjska presuda ukinuti ili preinačiti i u korist okrivljenika.
(3) The violation set out in Article 195, paragraph 1, point 2, of this Act may be asserted by the appellant in their appeal only where the appellant was unable to assert it in the course of the trial or the proceeding or where, although they asserted it, the court of first instance failed to take it into account. 
(3) Na povredu iz članka 195. stavka 1. točke 2. ovoga Zakona žalitelj se može pozvati u žalbi samo ako tu povredu nije mogao iznijeti u tijeku glavne rasprave ili postupka, ili je iznio, ali ju prvostupanjski sud nije uzeo u obzir.
(4) Where an appeal is filed only to the defendant's advantage, a judgement may not be amended to their disadvantage. 
(4) Ako je podnesena samo u korist okrivljenika žalba, presuda se ne smije izmijeniti na njegovu štetu.
(5) An appeal filed for the defendant's benefit on an error of fact or an error of substantive misdemeanour law shall also include an appeal against the decision on the misdemeanour sanction or the confiscation of a pecuniary advantage. 
(5) U korist okrivljenika podnesena žalba zbog pogrešno ili nepotpuno utvrđenog činjeničnog stanja ili zbog povrede materijalnog prekršajnog prava sadrži u sebi i žalbu zbog odluke o prekršajnopravnoj sankciji i oduzimanju imovinske koristi.
(6) If, upon someone's appeal, the court of second instance establishes that the reasons for which it decided in favour of the defendant are also advantageous to any co-defendant who did not appeal or did not appeal in this sense, it shall proceed of its own motion as if such an appeal was filed, unless a judgement has been delivered dismissing the charge against the appellant due to the expiry of the statute of limitations for misdemeanour prosecution. 
(6) Ako drugostupanjski sud u povodu bilo čije žalbe utvrdi da su razlozi zbog kojih je donio odluku u korist okrivljenika od koristi i za kojeg od suokrivljenika koji nije podnio žalbu ili je nije podnio u tom smislu, postupit će po službenoj dužnosti kao da takva žalba postoji, osim ako se protiv žalitelja presudom odbija optužba zbog nastupanja zastare prekršajnog progona.
Decisions on appeal of the court of second instance 
Odluke drugostupanjskog suda o žalbi
(1) In a panel session the court of second instance may make a decision rejecting an appeal as belated or inadmissible, or may deliver a judgement dismissing an appeal as unfounded and confirming the first-instance judgement, or may make a decision setting aside the first-instance judgement and remanding the case to the first instance, or may deliver a judgement amending the first-instance judgement. 
(1) Drugostupanjski sud može u sjednici vijeća rješenjem odbaciti žalbu kao nepravodobnu ili nedopuštenu, ili presudom odbiti žalbu kao neosnovanu i potvrditi prvostupanjsku presudu, ili rješenjem ukinuti prvostupanjsku presudu i dostaviti predmet prvostupanjskom sudu na ponovno suđenje i odluku, ili presudom preinačiti prvostupanjsku presudu.
(2) On all appeals against the same judgement the court of second instance shall decide in a single decision. 
(2) O svim žalbama protiv iste presude drugostupanjski sud odlučuje jednom odlukom.
Rejecting an appeal 
Odbacivanje žalbe
(1) A decision shall be made rejecting an appeal as belated if it is established that the appeal was filed after the statutory time limit. 
(1) Žalba će se odbaciti rješenjem kao nepravodobna ako se utvrdi da je podnesena nakon zakonskog roka.
(2) A decision shall be made rejecting an appeal as inadmissible if it is established that: 
(2) Žalba će se odbaciti rješenjem kao nedopuštena ako se:
1. the appeal was filed by a person not authorised to appeal; 
1. utvrdi da je žalbu podnijela osoba koja nije ovlaštena na podnošenje žalbe,
2. the appeal was filed by a person who has waived their right to appeal or who under this Act is deemed to have waived this right; 
2. utvrdi da je žalbu podnijela osoba koja se odrekla prava na podnošenje žalbe ili se prema ovome Zakonu smatra da se odrekla tog prava,
3. the appellant has withdrawn the appeal filed or is deemed under this Act to have withdrawn the appeal filed; 
3. utvrdi da je podnositelj odustao od podnesene žalbe ili se prema ovome Zakonu smatra da je odustao od podnesene žalbe,
4. the appeal is not allowed under law. 
4. utvrdi da žalba po zakonu nije dopuštena.
Dismissing an appeal 
Odbijanje žalbe
The court of second instance shall deliver a judgement dismissing an appeal as unfounded and confirming the first-instance judgement where it establishes that the grounds on which the judgement is challenged do not exist. 
Drugostupanjski će sud presudom odbiti žalbu kao neosnovanu i potvrditi prvostupanjsku presudu kad utvrdi da ne postoje razlozi zbog kojih se presuda pobija.
Setting aside a first-instance judgement 
Ukidanje prvostupanjske presude
(1) In upholding an appeal as well-founded, the court of second instance shall make a decision setting aside the first-instance judgement and remanding the case to the first instance if it establishes the existence of an error of procedural misdemeanour law, with the exception of the cases set out in Article 207, paragraph 1, of this Act, or if it holds that due to an error of fact a retrial or a new proceeding before the court of first instance is to be ordered. 
(1) Drugostupanjski će sud, prihvaćajući žalbu osnovanom, rješenjem ukinuti prvostupanjsku presudu i dostaviti predmet na ponovno suđenje ako utvrdi da postoji bitna povreda odredaba prekršajnog postupka, osim slučajeva iz članka 207. stavka 1. ovoga Zakona, ili ako smatra da zbog pogrešno ili nepotpuno utvrđenog činjeničnog stanja treba naložiti novu glavnu raspravu ili postupak pred prvostupanjskim sudom.
(2) The court of second instance may order that a retrial or a new proceeding before the court of first instance be held before a different judge. 
(2) Drugostupanjski sud može naložiti da se nova glavna rasprava odnosno postupak pred prvostupanjskim sudom održi pred drugim sucem.
(3) The court of second instance may also set aside a first-instance judgement only in part if particular parts of the judgement can be singled out without prejudice to proper adjudication. 
(3) Drugostupanjski sud može i samo djelomično ukinuti prvostupanjsku presudu ako se pojedini dijelovi presude mogu izdvojiti bez štete za pravilno suđenje.
Amending a first-instance judgement 
Preinačavanje prvostupanjske presude
The court of second instance shall, in upholding an appeal, deliver a judgement amending the first-instance judgement if it accepts the established facts as set out in the operative part of the judgement as correct and fully established and finds that in view of the established facts and through the proper application of law a different judgement needs to be delivered, and according to the facts, also in the case of any of the violations set out in Article 195, paragraph 1, points 6 and 9, of this Act. 
Drugostupanjski će sud, prihvaćajući žalbu presudom preinačiti prvostupanjsku presudu ako utvrđeno činjenično stanje iz izreke prvostupanjske presude prihvati pravilnim i potpuno utvrđenim i da se s obzirom na to utvrđeno činjenično stanje po pravilnoj primjeni zakona ima donijeti drukčija presuda, a prema stanju stvari i u slučaju povreda iz članka 195. stavka 1. točke 6. i 9. ovoga Zakona.
Statement of reasons for a second-instance judgement or decision 
Obrazloženje drugostupanjske presude i rješenja
(1) In the statement of reasons for its judgement or decision, the court of second instance needs to assess in essence the appeal allegations and state the violations of law it has taken into account. 
(1) U obrazloženju presude, odnosno rješenja drugostupanjski sud treba u bitnome ocijeniti žalbene navode i iznijeti povrede zakona koje je uzeo u obzir.
(2) Where a first-instance judgement is set aside for an error of procedural misdemeanour law, the statement of reasons shall specify which provisions of procedural misdemeanour law have been violated and in what respect. 
(2) Kad se prvostupanjsko presuda ukida zbog bitnih povreda odredaba prekršajnog postupka, u obrazloženju treba navesti koje su odredbe povrijeđene i u čemu se povrede sastoje.
(3) Where a first-instance judgement is set aside for an error of fact, the deficiencies in the establishment of facts, in particular in deciding on the motions of the parties for the obtainment and taking of particular evidence and why the new evidence and facts are important for proper adjudication, shall be stated. 
(3) Kad se prvostupanjsko presuda ukida zbog pogrešno ili nepotpuno utvrđenoga činjeničnog stanja, navest će se u čemu su nedostaci u utvrđivanju činjeničnog stanja, posebice u odlučivanju o prijedlozima stranaka da se pribave i izvedu pojedini dokazi, odnosno zašto su novi dokazi i činjenice važni za donošenje pravilne odluke.
Delivery of the file to the court of first instance 
Dostavljanje spisa prvostupanjskom sudu
(1) The court of second instance shall return all the files to the court of first instance together with a sufficient number of certified copies of its decision to be served on the parties and the other persons concerned. 
(1) Drugostupanjski će sud vratiti sve spise prvostupanjskom sudu s dovoljnim brojem ovjerenih prijepisa svoje odluke radi predaje strankama i drugim zainteresiranim osobama.
(2) If a defendant is in detention, the court of second instance shall deliver its decision and the files to the court of first instance as soon as possible. 
(2) Ako je okrivljenik u zadržavanju, drugostupanjski je sud dužan svoju odluku sa spisima dostaviti prvostupanjskom sudu žurno.
Retrial and decision-making by the court of first instance 
Ponovno suđenje i odlučivanje prvostupanjskog suda
(1) The court of first instance that is remanded the case shall proceed on the basis of the previous motion to indict. 
(1) Prvostupanjski sud kojem je predmet dostavljen na ponovno suđenje uzet će za osnovu prijašnji optužni prijedlog.
If a first-instance judgement is set aside in part, the said court shall proceed only on the basis of such part of the motion to indict as relates to the part of the judgement that was set aside. 
Ako je prvostupanjska presuda djelomično ukinuta, taj će sud za osnovu uzeti samo onaj dio optužnog prijedloga koji se odnosi na ukinuti dio presude.
(2) At a retrial or in a new proceeding the parties may assert new facts and present new evidence. 
(2) Na novoj glavnoj raspravi odnosno u postupku stranke mogu isticati nove činjenice i iznositi nove dokaze.
(3) The court of first instance shall perform all procedural acts and discuss all disputed issues to which the decision of the court of second instance refers. 
(3) Prvostupanjski je sud dužan izvesti sve postupovne radnje i raspraviti sva sporna pitanja na koja je upozorio drugostupanjski sud u svojoj odluci.
(4) In handing down a new judgement, the court of first instance is bound by the prohibition referred to in Article 202, paragraph 4, of this Act. 
(4) Pri izricanju nove presude prvostupanjski je sud vezan zabranom iz članka 202. stavka 4. ovoga Zakona.
2. APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION AND LEGAL RECOURSE AGAINST AN ORDER 
2. ŽALBA PROTIV RJEŠENJA I PRAVNO SREDSTVO PROTIV NAREDBE
Appeal against a decision 
Žalba protiv rješenja
(1) An appeal against a decision of a court of first instance that was made before, in the course of and after a conducted proceeding may always be filed by the parties and persons whose rights have been violated, unless this Act provides that it is not appealable. 
(1) Protiv rješenja prvostupanjskog suda donesenog prije, u tijeku i nakon provedenog postupka stranke i osobe čija su prava povrijeđena mogu uvijek podnijeti žalbu kad ovim Zakonom nije propisano da žalba nije dopuštena.
An appeal shall be filed with the court that made the decision within three days from the day of service of the decision, unless this Act provides for a different time limit. 
Žalba se podnosi sudu koji je donio rješenje u roku tri dana od dana dostave rješenja, osim ako ovim Zakonom nije određen drugi rok.
Unless this Act provides otherwise, an appeal shall stay the enforcement of the decision. 
Žalba odgađa izvršenje rješenja osim ako ovim Zakonom nije drukčije određeno.
(2) In deciding on an appeal, the court of second instance may decide to reject the appeal as belated or inadmissible, dismiss the appeal as unfounded, or uphold the appeal and amend or set aside the decision and, where necessary, remand the case to the first instance. 
(2) Rješavajući o žalbi, drugostupanjski sud može rješenjem odbaciti žalbu kao nepravodobnu ili kao nedopuštenu, odbiti žalbu kao neosnovanu ili prihvatiti žalbu i rješenje preinačiti ili ukinuti i prema potrebi predmet dostaviti prvostupanjskom sudu na ponovno odlučivanje.
(3) The provisions of Article 179, paragraphs 7 and 8, Article 191, Article 193 through 199, and Article 202, paragraph 6, of this Act shall apply accordingly to the procedure for appealing a decision. 
(3) Na postupak o žalbi protiv rješenja će se odgovarajuće primijenjivati odredbe članka 179. stavka 7. i 8., članka 191., članka 193. do 199. i članka 202. stavka 6. ovoga Zakona.
Legal recourse against an order 
Pravno sredstvo protiv naredbe
Unless this Act provides otherwise, orders shall not be appealable nor shall any other legal recourse be available against them. 
Ako ovim Zakonom nije određeno drukčije, protiv naredbe nije dopuštena žalba ili drugo pravno sredstvo.
Twenty-seventh Title (XXVII) 
Glava dvadesetsedma (XXVII.)
EXTRAORDINARY LEGAL REMEDIES 
IZVANREDNI PRAVNI LIJEKOVI
1. REOPENING OF A MISDEMEANOUR PROCEEDING 
1. OBNOVA PREKRŠAJNOG POSTUPKA
Reopening of a misdemeanour proceeding to the defendant's disadvantage 
Obnova prekršajnog postupka na štetu okrivljenika
(1) A misdemeanour proceeding may be conducted anew at the request of the authorised prosecutor if: 
(1) Prekršajni se postupak može ponovno provesti na zahtjev ovlaštenog tužitelja ako je:
1. the motion to indict was finally rejected because there was no authorised prosecutor; 
1. optužni prijedlog pravomoćno odbačen zato što nije bilo ovlaštenog tužitelja,
2. the motion to indict was finally rejected for the reason set out in Article 239, paragraph 6, of this Act; 
2. optužni prijedlog pravomoćno odbačen iz razloga predviđenog člankom 239. stavkom 6. ovoga Zakona,
3. the previous misdemeanour proceeding was finally terminated for lack of authorised prosecutor; 
3. prekršajni postupak pravomoćno obustavljen jer nije bilo ovlaštenog tužitelja,
4. the charge was finally dismissed because for lack of authorised prosecutor. 
4. optužba pravomoćno odbijena jer nije bilo ovlaštenog tužitelja.
(2) A misdemeanour proceeding may be conducted anew on the basis of a corrected or supplemented motion to indict if the motion to indict was rejected by decision on the grounds that it was sloppily written or incomplete. 
(2) Prekršajni se postupak može ponovno provesti, na temelju ispravljenog ili dopunjenog optužnog prijedloga, ako je pravomoćnim rješenjem odbačen optužni prijedlog zbog neurednosti ili nepotpunosti.
(3) If a charge is dismissed by a final judgement because the defendant, after committing a misdemeanour, has fallen victim to a long-term mental illness, the proceeding shall, upon motion of the authorised prosecutor, be continued as soon as the reasons for which such decision was made cease to exist. 
(3) Ako je pravomoćnom presudom odbijena optužba zbog toga što je okrivljenik nakon počinjenog prekršaja obolio od kakve trajne duševne bolesti, postupak će se na zahtjev ovlaštenog tužitelja nastaviti čim prestanu uzroci zbog kojih je donesena navedena odluka.
(4) If the authorised prosecutor referred to in Article 109, paragraph 1, points 1 through 3, of this Act fails to institute a misdemeanour proceeding within the prescribed time limit or withdraws, in the course of the proceeding, the motion to indict, as a result of which the charge is dismissed by a final judgement and the injured party does not institute a proceeding, the misdemeanour proceeding may be reopened if it is proven that the proceeding was not instituted or that the motion to indict was withdrawn as a result of the criminal offence of abuse of official position by the person responsible therefor within the authorised prosecution authority. 
(4) Ako ovlašteni tužitelj iz članka 109. stavka 1. točke 1. do 3. ovoga Zakona nije u propisanom roku pokrenuo prekršajni postupak ili je tijekom postupka odustao od optužnog prijedloga i stoga je pravomoćnom presudom odbijena optužba, a oštećenik nije pokrenuo postupak, prekršajni se postupak može obnoviti ako se dokaže da postupak nije pokrenut odnosno do odustanka od optužnog prijedloga je došlo zbog kaznenog djela zlouporabe službenog položaja odgovorne osobe za to u tijelu ovlaštenog tužitelja.
The provision of Article 214, paragraph 2, of this Act shall apply to the presentation of evidence. 
Glede dokazivanja kaznenog djela primijenit će se odredba članka 214. stavka 2. ovoga Zakona.
(5) In the case referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, limitation periods shall start to run from the day the conditions for the reopening of a misdemeanour proceeding are met. 
(5) U slučaju iz stavka 4. ovoga članka, rokovi zastare teku od dana kada su se stekli uvjeti za ponovno pokretanje prekršajnog postupka.
Reopening of a misdemeanour proceeding to the convicted person's advantage 
Obnova prekršajnog postupka u korist osuđenika
(1) A misdemeanour proceeding that ended with a final judgement or another misdemeanour decision may be reopened to the advantage of the convicted person if: 
(1) Prekršajni se postupak završen pravomoćnom presudom ili drugom odlukom o prekršaju može obnoviti u korist osuđenika:
1. it is proven that the judgement or another decision is based on a false document or a false testimony of a witness, expert witness or interpreter; 
1. ako se dokaže da je presuda ili druga odluka utemeljena na lažnoj ispravi ili na lažnom iskazu svjedoka, vještaka ili tumača,
2. it is proven that the judgement or another decision was rendered as a result of a criminal offence committed by the the responsible person of the prosecutor or by the judge; 
2. ako se dokaže da je do presude ili druge odluke došlo zbog kaznenog djela odgovorne osobe tužitelja ili suca,
3. new facts are put forward or new evidence presented which in themselves or in relation to previous evidence constitute an appropriate legal basis for the convicted person's acquittal or their conviction under a more lenient regulation; 
3. ako se iznesu nove činjenice ili se podnesu novi dokazi koji su sami za sebe ili u svezi s prijašnjim dokazima prikladni da prouzroče oslobođenje osuđenika koji je bio osuđen ili njegovu osudu po blažem propisu,
4. a convicted person has been convicted more than once for the same act or if more than one convicted person were convicted of an act that could have been committed by only one or some of the convicted persons. 
4. ako je osuđenik za isto djelo više puta osuđen ili ako je više osuđenika osuđeno zbog istog djela koje je mogao počiniti samo jedan osuđenik ili neki od njih.
(2) In the cases referred to in paragraph 1, points 1 and 2, of this Article there must be a final judgement proving that the said persons have been found guilty of the criminal offences in question. 
(2) U slučajevima iz stavka 1. točke 1. i 2. ovoga članka mora se pravomoćnom presudom dokazati da su navedene osobe proglašene krivim za dotična kaznena djela.
Where a proceeding against these persons cannot be conducted by reason of their death or the existence of such circumstances as exclude criminal prosecution, the facts referred to in paragraph 1, points 1 and 2, of this Article may be established also by means of other evidence. 
Ako se postupak protiv tih osoba ne može provesti zbog toga što su umrle ili što postoje okolnosti koje isključuju kazneni progon, činjenice iz stavka 1. točke 1. i 2. ovoga članka mogu se utvrditi i drugim dokazima.
Persons entitled to file a petition, filing of and deciding on a petition 
Ovlaštenici za podnošenje zahtjeva, podnošenje i odlučivanje o zahtjevu
(1) A petition for the reopening of a misdemeanour proceeding may be filed by the parties and, in case the convicted person dies, by the persons referred to in Article 192, paragraph 2, of this Act. 
(1) Zahtjev za obnovu prekršajnog postupka mogu podnijeti stranke, a nakon smrti osuđenika i osobe iz članka 192. stavka 2. ovoga Zakona.
(2) A petition may be filed also after a misdemeanour sanction has been enforced and notwithstanding the statute of limitations. 
(2) Zahtjev se može podnijeti i nakon što je prekršajnopravna sankcija izvršena i bez obzira na zastaru.
(3) A petition shall be filed with and decided on by the misdemeanour court that heard the previous case. 
(3) Zahtjev se podnosi prekršajnom sudu koji je sudio u prijašnjem postupku, koji i odlučuje o zahtjevu.
(4) A petition shall state the statutory basis for requesting the reopening of a proceeding and the evidence corroborating the facts on which the petition is based. 
(4) U zahtjevu se mora navesti po kojoj zakonskoj osnovi se traži obnova i kojim se dokazima potkrepljuju činjenice na kojima se zahtjev temelji.
If a petition fails to include such information, the court shall proceed in accordance with Article 117, paragraph 4, of this Act. 
Ako zahtjev ne sadrži te podatke, sud će postupiti sukladno članku 117. stavku 4. ovoga Zakona.
(5) A judge who took part in the taking of the previous decision may not take part in deciding on the petition. 
(5) U rješavanju o zahtjevu ne može sudjelovati sudac koji je sudjelovao u donošenju prijašnje odluke.
(6) The court shall decide to reject a petition if it establishes: 
(6) Sud će rješenjem zahtjev odbaciti ako utvrdi:
1. that the petition does not contain the information referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article; 
1. da zahtjev ne sadrži podatke iz stavka 4. ovoga članka,
2. on the basis of the petition itself and the file of the previous case that the petition has been filed by a person not entitled thereto; 
2. na temelju samog zahtjeva i spisa prijašnjeg postupka da je zahtjev podnijela neovlaštena osoba,
3. that the statutory conditions for the reopening are not met; 
3. da nema zakonskih uvjeta za obnovu postupka,
4. that the facts and evidence forming the basis of the petition were already put forward in a previous petition for the reopening of a proceeding that was dismissed by a final court decision; 
4. da su činjenice i dokazi na kojima se zahtjev temelji već bili izneseni u prijašnjem zahtjevu za obnovu postupka koji je odbijen pravomoćnim rješenjem suda,
5. that the facts and evidence obviously do not constitute an appropriate legal basis for the reopening of a proceeding. 
5. da činjenice i dokazi očito nisu prikladni da se na temelju njih dopusti obnova.
(7) If the court does not reject a petition under paragraph 6 of this Article, it shall serve a copy of the petition to the opposing party, which shall have eight days to respond to the petition. 
(7) Ako sud ne odbaci zahtjev prema stavku 6. ovoga članka, dostavit će prijepis zahtjeva protivnoj stranci, koja ima pravo u roku od osam dana odgovoriti na zahtjev.