natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
90 Moreover, the interference with the right to property of such operators is limited to their right to use their land and is temporary in so far as, provided that they have carried out the recovery measures imposed on them by the competent authorities, they can recover full enjoyment of their property rights. 
90 Osim toga, zadiranje u pravo vlasništva tih operatera ograničeno je na njihovo pravo uporabe vlastitog zemljišta i ostaje privremeno u smislu da oni ponovno mogu u potpunosti uživati svoja prava vlasništva čim izvrše mjere otklanjanja koje su im nametnula nadležna tijela.
91 In those circumstances, such measures on the part of the competent authority do not appear to go beyond what is necessary to attain the basic objective of Directive 2004/35, namely to prevent and remedy environmental damage, which means that, in this instance, the operators in question must implement the remedial measures determined by that authority. 
91 U tim okolnostima takve mjere nadležnog tijela ne prekoračuju ono što je potrebno za postizanje osnovnog cilja Direktive 2004/35, a to je sprečavanje i otklanjanje štete u okolišu, što znači da u ovom slučaju dotični operateri moraju provesti mjere otklanjanja koje je odredilo to tijelo.
92 The answer to the third question is therefore that, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, Directive 2004/35 does not preclude national legislation which permits the competent authority to make the exercise by operators at whom environmental recovery measures are directed of the right to use their land subject to the condition that they carry out the works required by the authority, even though that land is not affected by those measures because it has already been decontaminated or has never been polluted. 
92 Stoga na treće pitanje valja odgovoriti da, u okolnostima kakve su u glavnom postupku, Direktivi 2004/35 nije protivan nacionalni propis koji nadležnom tijelu dopušta da ostvarivanje prava operatera na koje se odnose mjere otklanjanja štete u okolišu na uporabu vlastitog zemljišta uvjetuje izvršenjem radova koje to tijelo zahtijeva, čak i ako se te mjere ne odnose na to zemljište budući da je već dekontaminirano ili nikad nije bilo onečišćeno.
However, such a measure must be justified by the objective of preventing a deterioration of the environmental situation in the area in which those measures are implemented or, pursuant to the precautionary principle, by the objective of preventing the occurrence or resurgence of further environmental damage on the land belonging to the operators which is adjacent to the whole shoreline at which those remedial measures are directed. 
Međutim, takva mjera mora biti opravdana ciljem sprečavanja pogoršanja stanja okoliša na području na kojem se te mjere provode ili, u skladu s načelom opreznosti, ciljem sprečavanja nastanka ili ponovne pojave daljnje štete u okolišu na susjednom zemljištu u vlasništvu operaterâ uzduž cijele obale na koju su usmjerene te mjere otklanjanja.
1. Articles 7 and 11(4) of Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage, in conjunction with Annex II to the directive, must be interpreted as permitting the competent authority to alter substantially measures for remedying environmental damage which were chosen at the conclusion of a procedure carried out on a consultative basis with the operators concerned and which have already been implemented or begun to be put into effect. 
1. Članak 7. i članak 11. stavak 4. Direktive 2004/35 o odgovornosti za okoliš u pogledu sprečavanja i otklanjanja štete u okolišu, u vezi s Prilogom II. toj Direktivi, treba tumačiti tako da nadležnom tijelu dopuštaju da bitno izmijeni mjere otklanjanja štete u okolišu koje su odabrane nakon postupka provedenog na osnovi savjetovanja s dotičnim operaterima, a koje su već provedene ili su se počele provoditi.
is also required to invite, inter alia, the persons on whose land those measures are to be carried out to submit their observations and to take them into account; and 
dužno je isto tako pozvati osobito osobe na čijem će se zemljištu te mjere provoditi da daju svoje primjedbe, i te primjedbe uzima u obzir; i - mora voditi računa o kriterijima utvrđenima u odjeljku 1.3.1.
must take account of the criteria set out in Section 1.3.1. of Annex II to Directive 2004/35 and state in its decision the grounds on which its choice is based, and, where appropriate, the grounds which justify the fact that there was no need for a detailed examination in the light of those criteria or that it was not possible to carry out such an examination due, for example, to the urgency of the environmental situation. 
Priloga II. Direktivi 2004/35 i u svojoj odluci navesti razloge svog odabira te, prema potrebi, razloge kojima se opravdava činjenica da nije bilo potrebe za detaljnom procjenom s obzirom na te kriterije ili da takvu procjenu nije bilo moguće provesti, na primjer zbog hitnosti situacije u okolišu.
2. In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, Directive 2004/35 does not preclude national legislation which permits the competent authority to make the exercise by operators at whom environmental recovery measures are directed of the right to use their land subject to the condition that they carry out the works required by the authority, even though that land is not affected by those measures because it has already been decontaminated or has never been polluted. 
2. U okolnostima kakve su u glavnom postupku, Direktivi 2004/35 nije protivan nacionalni propis koji nadležnom tijelu dopušta da ostvarivanje prava operatera na koje se odnose mjere otklanjanja štete u okolišu na uporabu vlastitog zemljišta uvjetuje izvršenjem radova koje to tijelo zahtijeva, čak i ako se te mjere ne odnose na to zemljište budući je već dekontaminirano ili nikad nije bilo onečišćeno.
(Appeal - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Common Position 2001/931/CFSC - Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Freezing of funds applicable to a group included in a list drawn up, revised and amended by the Council of the European Union - Rights of the defence) 
„Žalba - Zajednička vanjska i sigurnosna politika - Mjere ograničavanja protiv određenih osoba i subjekata s ciljem borbe protiv terorizma - Zajedničko stajalište 2001/931/ZVSP - Uredba (EZ) br. 2580/2001 - Zamrzavanje sredstava koje se primjenjuje na skupinu koja se nalazi na popisu koji je izradilo, revidiralo i izmijenilo Vijeće Europske unije - Pravo na obranu"
In Case C-27/09 P, 
U predmetu C-27/09 P,
APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 19 January 2009, 
povodom žalbe na temelju članka 56. Statuta Suda Europske unije, podnesene 19. siječnja 2009.,
French Republic, represented by E. Belliard and by G. de Bergues and A. Adam, acting as Agents, 
Francuska Republika, koju zastupaju E. Belliard, G. de Bergues i A. Adam, u svojstvu agenata,
appellant, 
žalitelj,
the other parties to the proceedings being: 
druge stranke u postupku su:
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, established at Auvers-sur-Oise (France), represented by J.-P. Spitzer, avocat, D. Vaughan QC and M.-E. Demetriou, Barrister, 
People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran, osnovana u Auvers-sur-Oise (Francuska), koju zastupaju J.-P. Spitzer, avocat, D. Vaughan, QC i M.-E. Demetriou, Barrister,
applicant at first instance, 
tužitelj u prvostupanjskom postupku,
Council of the European Union, 
Vijeće Europske unije,
defendant at first instance, 
tuženik u prvostupanjskom postupku,
European Commission, represented by S. Boelaert and P. Aalto, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg, 
Europska komisija, koju zastupaju S. Boelaert i P. Aalto, u svojstvu agenata, s izabranom adresom za dostavu u Luxembourgu,
intervener at first instance, 
intervenijent u prvostupanjskom postupku,
composed of V. Skouris, President, A. Tizzano, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues (Rapporteur), K. Lenaerts and J.-C. Bonichot, Presidents of Chambers, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, A. Arabadjiev and C. Toader, Judges, 
u sastavu: V. Skouris, predsjednik, A. Tizzano, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues (izvjestitelj), K. Lenaerts i J.-C. Bonichot, predsjednici vijeća, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, A. Arabadjiev i C. Toader, suci,
1 By its appeal, the French Republic seeks to have set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 4 December 2008 in Case T-284/08 People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran v Council [2008] ECR I-3487 (`the judgment under appeal'), by which that court upheld the action brought by the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (`the PMOI') for annulment of Council Decision 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2007/868/EC (OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21, `the contested decision'), insofar as it concerned the PMOI. 
1 Francuska Republika svojom žalbom traži ukidanje presude Prvostupanjskog suda Europskih zajednica od 4. prosinca 2008., People's Mojahedin Organisation of Iran/ Vijeće (T-284/08, Zb., str. II-3487., u daljnjem tekstu: pobijana presuda), kojom je sud prihvatio tužbu koju je podnio People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran (u daljnjem tekstu: PMOI) za poništenje Odluke Vijeća 2008/583/EZ od 15. srpnja 2008. o provedbi članka 2. stavka 3. Uredbe (EZ) br. 2580/2001 o posebnim mjerama ograničavanja protiv određenih osoba i subjekata s ciljem borbe protiv terorizma, te o stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2007/868/EZ (SL L 188, str. 21.) (u daljnjem tekstu: sporna odluka), u dijelu koji se odnosi na PMOI.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001) 
Rezolucija Vijeća sigurnosti Ujedinjenih naroda 1373 (2001)
2 On 28 September 2001, the United Nations Security Council (`the UN Security Council') adopted Resolution 1373 (2001) on strategies to combat terrorism and, in particular, the financing of terrorism, by any means. 
2 Vijeće sigurnosti Ujedinjenih naroda (u daljnjem tekstu: Vijeće sigurnosti UN-a) donijelo je 28. rujna 2001. Rezoluciju 1373 (2001) o strategiji za borbu svim sredstvima protiv terorizma, a posebno financiranja terorizma.
Point 1(c) of the Resolution provides, inter alia, that all States are to freeze without delay funds and other financial assets or economic resources of persons who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts; of entities owned or controlled by such persons; and of persons and entities acting on behalf of or at the direction of such persons and entities. 
Točkom 1.(c) Rezolucije propisuje se, među ostalim, da sve države moraju odmah zamrznuti sredstva i drugu financijsku imovinu ili ekonomske izvore osoba koje su počinile ili pokušale počiniti terorističko djelo ili koje sudjeluju u počinjenju terorističkog djela ili olakšavaju njegovo počinjenje; subjekata u vlasništvu ili pod kontrolom tih osoba; i osoba i subjekata koji postupaju u ime ili po uputama tih osoba i subjekata.
3 This resolution does not provide a list of persons to whom the restrictive measures must be applied. 
3 Rezolucijom nije predviđen popis osoba na koje se mjere ograničavanja moraju primijeniti.
Common Position 2001/931/CFSP 
Zajedničko stajalište 2001/931/ZVSP
4 On 27 December 2001, on the view that action by the European Community was necessary in order to implement Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), the Council of the European Union adopted, inter alia, Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 93). 
4 Smatrajući da je potrebno poduzeti mjere za provedbu Rezolucije Vijeća sigurnosti 1373 (2001), Vijeće Europske unije donijelo je 27. prosinca 2001., među ostalim, Zajedničko stajalište 2001/931/ZVSP o primjeni posebnih mjera u borbi protiv terorizma (SL L 344, str. 93.) (SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 18., svezak 1., str. 11.).
5 Article 1(1) of that Common Position provides: 
5 Člankom 1. stavkom 1. tog Zajedničkog stajališta određuje se:
`This Common Position applies in accordance with the provisions of the following Articles to persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts and listed in the Annex.' 
„Ovo Zajedničko stajalište primjenjuje se sukladno odredbama sljedećih članaka na osobe, skupine i subjekte navedene u Prilogu, a koje su uključene u teroristička djela."
6 Article 1(2) and (3) of Common Position 2001/931 defines what is meant by `persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts' and `terrorist act', respectively. 
6 Člankom 1. stavcima 2. i 3. Zajedničkog stajališta 2001/931 definira se tko/što su „osobe, skupine i su bjekti uključeni u teroristička djela" i što je „terorističko djelo".
7 Article 1(4) and (6) of that Common Position provides: 
7 Člankom 1. stavcima 4. i 6. tog Zajedničkog stajališta određuje se:
`4. The list in the Annex shall be drawn up on the basis of precise information or material in the relevant file which indicates that a decision has been taken by a competent authority in respect of the persons, groups and entities concerned, irrespective of whether it concerns the instigation of investigations or prosecution for a terrorist act, an attempt to perpetrate, participate in or facilitate such an act based on serious and credible evidence or clues, or condemnation for such deeds. 
„4. Popis u Prilogu sastavlja se na temelju točnih podataka ili materijala iz odgovarajuće dokumentacije koja ukazuje na to da je odluku u vezi s tim osobama, skupinama i subjektima donijelo nadležno tijelo, bez obzira na to je li ta odluka donesena u vezi s pokretanjem istrage ili kaznenog progona za terorističko djelo, za pokušaj počinjenja, sudjelovanje, ili pomaganje pri počinjenju takvog djela, na temelju ozbiljnih i vjerodostojnih dokaza ili indicija, ili na temelju osuda za takva djela.
Persons, groups and entities identified by the Security Council of the United Nations as being related to terrorism and against whom it has ordered sanctions may be included in the list. 
Popisu se mogu dodati osobe, skupine i subjekti za koje je Vijeće sigurnosti Ujedinjenih naroda identificiralo da su povezani s terorizmom i protiv kojih je odredilo sankcije.
For the purposes of this paragraph, "competent authority" shall mean a judicial authority, or, where judicial authorities have no competence in the area covered by this paragraph, an equivalent competent authority in that area. 
U smislu ovog stavka, „nadležno tijelo" jest pravosudno tijelo ili, tamo gdje pravosudna tijela nisu nadležna za područje u smislu ovog stavka, ekvivalentno tijelo nadležno za ovo područje. [...]
... 6. The names of persons and entities on the list in the Annex shall be reviewed at regular intervals and at least once every six months to ensure that there are grounds for keeping them on the list.' 
6. Imena osoba i subjekata navedenih na popisu redovito se revidiraju, a najmanje jednom u šest mjeseci, kako bi se osiguralo postojanje razloga zadržavanja imena na popisu."
8 The PMOI was added to the list in the Annex to Common Position 2001/931 by Council Common Position 2002/340/CFSP of 2 May 2002 updating Common Position 2001/931 (OJ 2002 L 116, p. 75). 
8 Zajedničkim stajalištem Vijeća 2002/340/ZVSP od 2. svibnja 2002. o ažuriranju Zajedničkog stajališta 2001/931 (SL L 116, str. 75.) na popis u Prilogu Zajedničkom stajalištu 2001/931 uvršten je PMOI.
9 The PMOI's inclusion in the list appearing in the Annex to Common Position 2001/931 was then maintained by a series of subsequent decisions taken by the Council in accordance with Article 1(6) of that Common Position. 
9 PMOI je zatim na popisu iz Priloga Zajedničkom stajalištu 2001/931 održavan nizom odluka koje je Vijeće naknadno donosilo u skladu s člankom 1. stavkom 6. tog Zajedničkog stajališta.
10 On 27 December 2001 the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 70). 
10 Vijeće je 27. prosinca 2001. donijelo Uredbu (EZ) br. 2580/2001 o posebnim mjerama ograničavan ja protiv određenih osoba i subjekata s ciljem borbe protiv terorizma (SL L 344, str. 70. i ispravak SL L 52, str. 58.) (SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 18. svezak 1. str. 5.).
11 Recital 5 in the preamble to Regulation No 2580/2001 states: 
11 U uvodnoj izjavi 5. u preambuli Uredbe br. 2580/2001 navodi se:
`Action by the Community is necessary in order to implement the CFSP [common foreign and security policy] aspects of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP.' 
„Za provedbu elemenata ZVSP-a Zajedničkog stajališta 2001/931/ZVSP, nužno je djelovanje Zajednice."
12 In the words of Article 2 of that regulation: 
12 U skladu s člankom 2. te Uredbe:
`1. Except as permitted under Articles 5 and 6: 
„1. Osim iznimaka dopuštenih u skladu s člancima 5. i 6.:
(a) all funds, other financial assets and economic resources belonging to, or owned or held by, a natural or legal person, group or entity included in the list referred to in paragraph 3 shall be frozen; 
(a) sva financijska sredstva, ostala financijska imovina i gospodarski izvori koji pripadaju, ili koje ima u vlasništvu ili drži neka fizička ili pravna osoba, skupina ili subjekt navedeni u popisu iz stavka 3. zamrzavaju se;
(b) no funds, other financial assets and economic resources shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to, or for the benefit of, a natural or legal person, group or entity included in the list referred to in paragraph 3. 
(b) nikakva financijska sredstva, ostala financijska imovina ili gospodarski izvori nisu dostupni, neposredno ili posredno, u korist neke fizičke ili pravne osobe, skupine ili subjekta uključenog u popis iz stavka 3.
2. Except as permitted under Articles 5 and 6, it shall be prohibited to provide financial services to, or for the benefit of, a natural or legal person, group or entity included in the list referred to in paragraph 3. 
2. Osim iznimaka dopuštenih u skladu s člancima 5. i 6., zabranjeno je pružanje financijskih usluga nekoj fizičkoj ili pravnoj osobi, skupini ili subjektu navedenom u popisu iz stavka 3. ili u njihovu korist.
3. The Council, acting by unanimity, shall establish, review and amend the list of persons, groups and entities to which this Regulation applies, in accordance with the provisions laid down in Article 1(4), (5) and (6) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP ...' 
3. Odlučujući jednoglasno, Vijeće utvrđuje, ispituje i mijenja popis osoba, skupina i subjekata na koje se ova Uredba odnosi, u skladu s odredbama članka 1. stavaka 4., 5. i 6. Zajedničkog stajališta 2001/931/ZVSP [...]"
13 The PMOI was added to the list referred to in Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 by Council Decision 2002/334/EC of 2 May 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 and repealing Decision 2001/927/EC (OJ 2002 L 116, p. 33). 
13 PMOI je na popis iz članka 2. stavka 3. Uredbe br. 2580/2001 dodan Odlukom Vijeća 2002/334/EZ od 2. svibnja 2002. o provedbi članka 2. stavka 3. Uredbe br. 2580/2001 i stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2001/927/EZ (SL L 116, str. 33.).
14 Subsequently, the PMOI's inclusion in the list referred to in Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 was continued by further Council decisions, adopted in accordance with Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001, including the contested decision. 
14 PMOI je zatim ostao na tom popisu na temelju niza odluka koje je Vijeće naknadno donosilo u skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 3. Uredbe br. 2580/2001, uključujući i spornu odluku.
15 The PMOI was removed from that list by Council Decision 2009/62/EC of 26 January 2009 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 and repealing Decision 2008/583/EC (OJ 2009 L 23, p. 25). 
15 PMOI je s tog popisa uklonjen Odlukom Vijeća 2009/62/EZ od 26. siječnja 2009. o provedbi članka 2. stavka 3. Uredbe br. 2580/2001 i stavljanju izvan snage Odluke 2008/583/EZ (SL L 23, str. 25.) (SL, posebno izdanje na hrvatskom jeziku, poglavlje 18., svezak 4., str. 46.).
16 Recital 5 in the preamble to Decision 2009/62 states: 
16 U uvodnoj izjavi 5. u preambuli Odluke 2009/62 navodi se:
`Following the judgment [under appeal], one group has not been included in the list of persons, groups and entities to which Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 applies.' 
„Slijedom presude [u žalbenom postupku] Prvostupanjskog suda od 4. prosinca 2008. u predmetu T-284/08, jedna skupina nije uvrštena na popis osoba, skupina i subjekata na koje se primjenjuje Uredba (EZ) br. 2580/2001."
17 It is not disputed that the group referred to in that recital is the PMOI. 
17 Nesporno je da je skupina navedena u toj uvodnoj izjavi PMOI.
Background to the case 
Okolnosti spora
18 For an account of the earlier background to the present dispute, paragraph 1 of the judgment under appeal makes reference to the judgments of the General Court in Case T-228/02 Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council [2006] ECR II-4665, paragraphs 1 to 26, and Case T-256/07 People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council [2008] ECR II-3019, paragraphs 1 to 37. 
18 Radi upoznavanja s dosadašnjim okolnostima ovog spora, u prvoj se točki pobijane presude poziva na presude Općeg suda od 12. prosinca 2006., Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran/Vijeće (T-22 8/02, Zb., str. II-4665., točke od 1. do 26. i od 23. listopada 2008., People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran/Vijeće (T-256/07, Zb., str. II-3019., točke od 1. do 37.).
19 Paragraphs 1, 2, 12 and 16 of Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council state as follows: 
19 U točkama 1., 2. 12. i 16. gore navedene presude Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran/Vijeće navodi se:
`1. As appears from the case-file, [the PMOI] was founded in 1965 and set itself the objective of replacing the regime of the Shah of Iran, then the mullahs' regime, by a democracy. 
„1. Iz spisa proizlazi da je [PMOI] osnovan 1965. zadavši si kao cilj zamjenu režima iranskoga šaha, a zatim i režima mula, demokracijom.
In 1981 it took part in the foundation of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), a body defining itself as the "parliament in exile of the Iranian resistance". 
Godine 1981. sudjelovao je u osnivanju National Council of Resistance of Iran (dalje u tekstu: NCRI), tijela koje sebe definira kao „parlament iranskog otpora u izgnanstvu".
At the time of the facts giving rise to the present dispute, it was composed of five separate organisations and an independent section, making up an armed branch operating inside Iran. 
U vrijeme činjenica koje su dovele do ovog spora sastojao se od pet zasebnih organizacija i jedne neovisne sekcije, oružanog ogranka koji je djelovao u samom Iranu.
According to [the PMOI], however, it and all its members have expressly renounced all military activity since June 2001 and it no longer has an armed structure at the present time. 
Međutim, prema tvrdnjama [PMOI-ja], on sam i sve njegove članice izričito su se od lipnja 2001. odrekli svih vojnih aktivnosti te trenutačno u svom sastavu više nema nijednu vojnu strukturu.
2. By order of 28 March 2001, the United Kingdom Secretary of State for the Home Department ("the Home Secretary") included [the PMOI] in the list of organisations proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. 
2. UK Secretary of State for the Home Department (Ministarstvo unutarnjih poslova, Ujedinjena Kraljevina, u daljnjem tekstu: Home Secretary) rješenjem je [PMOI] uvrstio u popis organizacija zabranjenih na temelju Zakona o terorizmu iz 2000.