natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
69 It is true that, according to the Greek Government, the competent authorities, which have planned to establish and put into operation a mechanical recycling and composting plant and a landfill site at Strongilo Kefali in the municipality of Khordakios, have come up against opposition from the members of the public concerned, in the form of complaints and actions brought before the competent administrative and judicial authorities challenging the administrative decisions concerning the location of the two installations. 
69 Točno je da su prema tvrdnjama grčke vlade nadležna tijela koja na lokaciji „Strongilo Kefali" u općini Khordakios planiraju uspostaviti i staviti u pogon postrojenje za mehaničko recikliranje i kompostiranje kao i sanitarno odlagalište otpada naišla na protivljenje pojedinaca na koje se to odnosi u obliku prigovora i tužbi nadležnim upravnim i pravosudnim tijelima osporavajući upravne odluke o lokaciji dvaju postrojenja.
70 However, as has already been pointed out in paragraph 21 of the judgment in Case C-45/91, it is settled case-law that a Member State may not plead internal circumstances, such as difficulties of implementation which emerge at the stage when a Community measure is put into effect, to justify a failure to comply with obligations and time-limits laid down by Community law. 
70 Međutim, kako je već istaknuto u točki 21. navedene presude Komisija/Grčka, u skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom država članica se ne može pozivati na unutarnje okolnosti poput poteškoća u provođenju nastalih u fazi provedbe akta Zajednice, kako bi opravdala nepoštovanje obveza i vremenskih rokova predviđenih pravom Zajednice.
71 It must therefore be held that the Hellenic Republic has not complied with the judgment in Case C-45/91 inasmuch as it persists in failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of Directive 75/442 as regards adoption of the measures necessary to ensure that waste is disposed of in the area of Chania without endangering human health and without harming the environment. 
71 Prema tome valja utvrditi da Helenska Republika nije postupila u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka u mjeri u kojoj i dalje traje povreda obveza na temelju članka 4. Direktive 75/442 u pogledu donošenja potrebnih mjera koje bi osigurale da se otpad zbrine na području prefekture Chania na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu.
72 As regards, second, fulfilment of the obligation imposed by Article 5 of Directive 78/319 to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste without endangering human health and without harming the environment, the Greek Government's assertion that toxic and dangerous waste have not been tipped into the river Kouroupitos since 1996 is supported by consideration of the file. 
72 Drugo, u pogledu ispunjavanja obveze zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu, predviđene člankom 5. Direktive 78/319, valja utvrditi da studija priložena spisu dokazuje tvrdnju grčke vlade da se toksičan i opasan otpad više ne deponira u rijeku Kouroupitos.
Its assertion is disputed only partially by the Commission, which concedes that the quantities of toxic and dangerous waste have been reduced. 
Komisija, koja priznaje da su se smanjile količine toksičnog i opasnog otpada, samo djelomično osporava navedenu tvrdnju.
73 It is for the Commission in such circumstances to provide the Court, in the course of the proceedings, with the information necessary to determine the extent to which a Member State has complied with a judgment declaring it to be in breach of its obligations. 
73 U tim okolnostima valja napomenuti da Komisija u okviru ovog postupka treba Sudu osigurati potrebne informacije kako bi odredio u kojoj je mjeri država članica postupila u skladu s presudom u kojoj su utvrđene povrede njezinih obveza.
74 Since no such information is available, it has not been proved that the Hellenic Republic has failed fully to comply with the obligation to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste from the area of Chania in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 78/319. 
74 Budući da takve informacije nisu dostupne, valja napomenuti da nije dokazano da Helenska Republika nije u potpunosti ispunila obvezu zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada iz prefekture Chania u skladu s odredbama članka 5. Direktive 78/319.
75 As regards, third, fulfilment of the obligations to draw up waste disposal plans and to draw up, and keep up to date, plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste, imposed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 respectively, it is settled case-law that incomplete practical measures or fragmentary legislation cannot discharge the obligation of a Member State to draw up a comprehensive programme with a view to attaining certain objectives (Case C-298/97 Commission v Spain [1998] ECR I-3301, paragraph 16). 
75 Treće, s obzirom na izvršenje obveze izrade i ažuriranja planova za zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđene člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319, treba utvrditi da u skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom država članica ne može ispuniti obvezu izrade sveobuhvatnih programa radi postizanja određenih ciljeva pomoću nepotpunih praktičnih mjera ili fragmentarnog zakonodavstva (presuda od 28. svibnja 1998., Komisija/Španjolska, C-298/97, Zb., str. I-3301., t. 16.).
76 Contrary to the claims of the Greek Government, legislation or specific measures amounting only to a series of ad hoc normative interventions that are incapable of constituting an organised and coordinated system for the disposal of waste and toxic and dangerous waste cannot be regarded as plans which the Member States are required to adopt under Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 (see, by analogy, Case C-214/96 Commission v Spain [1998] ECR I-7661, paragraph 30). 
76 Suprotno tvrdnjama grčke vlade zakon ili konkretne mjere koje se sastoje samo od niza ad hoc normativnih intervencija koje ne predstavljaju organiziran i koordiniran sustav za zbrinjavanje otpada i toksičnog i opasnog otpada ne mogu se smatrati planovima koje države članice moraju donijeti na temelju članka 6. Direktive 75/442 i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 (vidjeti, analogijom, presudu od 25. studenoga 1998., Komisija/Španjolska, C-214/96, Zb., str. I-7661., t. 30.).
77 It therefore follows that the Hellenic Republic has likewise failed to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 inasmuch as it persists in failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 so far as concerns the drawing up of waste management plans and plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste. 
77 Slijedom navedenoga valja napomenuti da Helenska Republika nije postupila ni u skladu s gore navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka u mjeri u kojoj i dalje postoji povreda obveza koje ona ima na temelju članka 6. Direktive 75/442 i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 u pogledu izrade planova gospodarenja otpadom i planova zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada.
78 On the basis of all the foregoing considerations it must be held that, by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that waste is disposed of in the area of Chania without endangering human health and without harming the environment in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and by failing to draw up for that area plans for the disposal of waste, pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 75/442, and of toxic and dangerous waste, pursuant to Article 12 of Directive 78/319, the Hellenic Republic has not implemented all the necessary measures to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 and has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the Treaty. 
78 Na temelju svih gore navedenih razmatranja valja utvrditi da Helenska Republika nije poduzela sve potrebne mjere za postupanje u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka te je tako povrijedila svoje obveze na temelju članka 171. Ugovora jer nije poduzela potrebne mjere kako bi osigurala zbrinjavanje otpada na području prefekture Chania na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu u skladu s člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i jer nije izradila planove za zbrinjavanje otpada za to područje u skladu s člankom 6. Direktive 75/442, te zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada u skladu s člankom 12. Direktive 78/319.
Setting of the penalty payment 
Određivanje novčane kazne
79 Relying on the method of calculation set out in its memorandum 96/C 242/07 of 21 August 1996 on applying Article 171 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1996 C 242, p. 
79 Oslanjajući se na metodu izračuna utvrđenu u obavijestima 96/C 242/07 od 21. kolovoza 1996. o primjeni članka 171. Ugovora (SL C 242, str.
6) and its communication 97/C 63/02 of 28 February 1997 on the method of calculating the penalty payments provided for pursuant to Article 171 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1997 C 63, p. 2), the Commission has proposed that the Court should, in respect of failure to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91, impose a penalty payment of ECU 24 600 for each day of delay from the date of notification of the present judgment until the breach of obligations has been remedied. 
6.) i 97/C 63/02 od 28. veljače 1997. o metodi izračuna novčane kazne predviđene na temelju članka 171. Ugovora o EZ-u (SL C 63, str. 2.), Komisija predlaže Sudu da zbog nepostupanja u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka naloži novčanu kaznu od 24 600 ECU po danu zakašnjenja od dana obavijesti o ovoj presudi do prestanka povrede obveze.
The Commission contends that a financial penalty in the form of a periodic penalty payment is the most appropriate means of achieving the objective of compliance with the judgment as soon as possible. 
Komisija smatra da je novčana kazna u obliku dnevne novčane kazne najprimjereniji način postizanja cilja, a to je da država članica što je prije moguće postupi u skladu s presudom Komisija/Grčka.
80 The Greek Government claims that the Court should set the penalty payment on the basis of coefficients of seriousness and duration which are more favourable to the Hellenic Republic than those applied by the Commission. 
80 Grčka vlada zahtijeva od Suda da odredi novčanu kaznu na temelju koeficijenata težine i trajanja povrede koji su za Helensku Republiku povoljniji od onih koje je primijenila Komisija.
It contends that the coefficient relating to the duration of the infringement, determined unilaterally by the Commission without considering the extent to which the judgment has been complied with, does not reflect the existing situation and would be unfair to the Hellenic Republic. 
Ona smatra da koeficijent koji se odnosi na trajanje povrede, a koji je Komisija jednostrano odredila ne uzimajući u obzir doseg u kojem se postupalo u skladu s presudom, ne odražava postojeću situaciju te bi bio nepravedan prema Helenskoj Republici.
While the Commission has a discretion to determine coefficients relating to seriousness, duration and the Member States' ability to pay, without their assent, it is exclusively for the Court to assess what is just, proportionate and equitable. 
Prema mišljenju te vlade, iako Komisija ima diskrecijsku ovlast da odredi koeficijente s obzirom na težinu povrede, njezino trajanje i platežnu sposobnost država članica bez njihove suglasnosti, isključivo je na Sudu da procijeni što je pravedno, proporcionalno i pravično.
81 As to that, Article 171(1) of the Treaty provides that, if the Court finds that a Member State has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaty, that State is required to take the necessary measures to comply with the Court's judgment. 
81 U tom pogledu valja podsjetiti da članak 171. stavak 1. Ugovora predviđa da ako Sud utvrdi da je država članica povrijedila obvezu na temelju Ugovora, od te se države zahtijeva da poduzme potrebne mjere za postupanje u skladu s presudom Suda.
82 Article 171 of the Treaty does not specify the period within which a judgment must be complied with. 
82 U članku 171. Ugovora nije određen rok u kojem se mora postupiti u skladu s presudom.
However, in accordance with settled case-law, the importance of immediate and uniform application of Community law means that the process of compliance must be initiated at once and completed as soon as possible (Case 131/84 Commission v Italy [1985] ECR 3531, paragraph 7, Case 169/87 Commission v France [1988] ECR 4093, paragraph 14, and Case C-334/94 Commission v France, cited above). 
Međutim, u skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom, važnost žurne i ujednačene primjene prava Zajednice znači da postupak izvršenja treba započeti odmah i završiti ga što je prije moguće (presuda od 6. studenoga 1985., Komisija/Italija, 131/84, Zb., str. 3531., t. 7.; presuda od 13. srpnja 1988., Komisija/Francuska, 169/87, Zb., str. 4093., t. 14. i navedena presuda od 7. ožujka 1996., Komisija/Francuska, t. 31.).
83 If the Member State concerned has not taken the necessary measures to comply with the Court's judgment within the time-limit laid down by the Commission in the reasoned opinion adopted pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 171(2) of the Treaty, the Commission may bring the case before the Court. 
83 Ako država članica na koju se to odnosi ne poduzme potrebne mjere za postupanje u skladu s presudom Suda u roku koji Komisija odredi u svojem obrazloženom mišljenju donesenom na temelju članka 171. stavka 2. podstavka 1. Ugovora, Komisija može predmet uputiti Sudu.
As provided in the second subparagraph of Article 171(2), the Commission is to specify the amount of the lump sum or penalty payment to be paid by the Member State concerned which it considers appropriate in the circumstances. 
U smislu članka 171. stavka 2. podstavka 2. Ugovora Komisija određuje visinu paušalnog iznosa ili novčane kazne koju je država članica na koju se to odnosi dužna platiti, a koju smatra primjerenom s obzirom na okolnosti.
84 In the absence of provisions in the Treaty, the Commission may adopt guidelines for determining how the lump sums or penalty payments which it intends to propose to the Court are calculated, so as, in particular, to ensure equal treatment between the Member States. 
84 Budući da u Ugovoru ne postoje odredbe u tom pogledu, valja priznati da Komisija može donijeti smjernice za određivanje izračuna paušalnih iznosa ili novčanih kazni koje namjerava predložiti Sudu, posebno kako bi osigurala jednako postupanje među državama članicama.
85 Memorandum 96/C 242/07 states that decisions as to the amount of a fine or penalty payment must be taken with an eye to their purpose, namely the effective enforcement of Community law. 
85 U tom pogledu u navedenoj obavijesti 96/C 242/07 navodi se da kod određivanja iznosa kazne ili novčane kazne treba imati u vidu svrhu tog instrumenta, a to je učinkovita provedba prava Zajednice.
The Commission therefore considers that the amount must be calculated on the basis of three fundamental criteria: the seriousness of the infringement, its duration and the need to ensure that the penalty itself is a deterrent to continuation of the infringement and to further infringements. 
Komisija stoga smatra da se iznos mora izračunati na osnovi triju temeljnih kriterija, tj. težine povrede, njezina trajanja te potrebe da se osigura da sama kazna ima odvraćajući učinak kojim se sprečava nastavak povrede ili ponovna povreda.
86 Communication 97/C 63/02 identifies the mathematical variables used to calculate the amount of penalty payments, that is to say a uniform flat-rate amount, a coefficient of seriousness, a coefficient of duration, and a factor intended to reflect the Member State's ability to pay while ensuring that the penalty payment is proportionate and has a deterrent effect, calculated on the basis of the gross domestic product of the Member States and the weighting of their votes in the Council. 
86 U gore navedenoj obavijesti 97/C 3/02 utvrđuju se matematičke varijable korištene za izračun iznosa novčane kazne, odnosno ujednačeni paušalni iznos, koeficijent težine povrede, koeficijent trajanja i faktor koji odražava platežnu sposobnost države članice istovremeno osiguravajući da je novčana kazna proporcionalna te da ima odvraćajući učinak, da je izračunana na temelju bruto domaćeg proizvoda država članica i ponderiranja njihovih glasova u Vijeću.
87 Those guidelines, setting out the approach which the Commission proposes to follow, help to ensure that it acts in a manner which is transparent, foreseeable and consistent with legal certainty and are designed to achieve proportionality in the amounts of the penalty payments to be proposed by it. 
87 Ta indikativna pravila kojima se utvrđuju smjernice koje Komisija namjerava slijediti pomažu osigurati da ona djeluje na transparentan, predvidljiv način u skladu s pravnom sigurnosti te s ciljem postizanja proporcionalnosti iznosa novčanih kazni koje ona predlaže.
88 The Commission's suggestion that account should be taken both of the gross domestic product of the Member State concerned and of the number of its votes in the Council appears appropriate in that it enables that Member State's ability to pay to be reflected while keeping the variation between Member States within a reasonable range. 
88 U tom pogledu prijedlog Komisije da se vodi računa i o bruto domaćem proizvodu predmetne države članice i broju glasova koje ona ima u Vijeću primjeren je budući da se njime vodi računa o platežnoj sposobnosti te države članice pri čemu zadržava razlike između država članica u razumnom okviru.
89 It should be stressed that these suggestions of the Commission cannot bind the Court. 
89 Valja naglasiti da ovi prijedlozi Komisije ne mogu biti obvezujući za Sud.
It is expressly stated in the third subparagraph of Article 171(2) of the Treaty that the Court, if it finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment ... may impose a lump sum or a penalty payment on it. 
Ustvari, u članku 171. stavku 2. podstavku 3. Ugovora izričito se navodi da „Utvrdi li Sud da država članica nije postupila sukladno njegovoj presudi, može joj odrediti plaćanje paušalnog iznosa ili novčane kazne."
However, the suggestions are a useful point of reference. 
Međutim, ti prijedlozi predstavljaju korisnu referentnu osnovicu.
90 First, since the principal aim of penalty payments is that the Member State should remedy the breach of obligations as soon as possible, a penalty payment must be set that will be appropriate to the circumstances and proportionate both to the breach which has been found and to the ability to pay of the Member State concerned. 
90 Prvo, s obzirom da je glavni cilj novčane kazne da država članica okonča povredu obveze što je prije moguće, iznos novčane kazne mora se odrediti na način da je primjerena okolnostima i proporcionalna utvrđenoj povredi kao i platežnoj sposobnosti države članice na koju se odnosi.
91 Second, the degree of urgency that the Member State concerned should fulfil its obligations may vary in accordance with the breach. 
91 Drugo, stupanj žurnosti ispunjenja obveza predmetne države članice može varirati u skladu s povredom.
92 In that light, and as the Commission has suggested, the basic criteria which must be taken into account in order to ensure that penalty payments have coercive force and Community law is applied uniformly and effectively are, in principle, the duration of the infringement, its degree of seriousness and the ability of the Member State to pay. 
92 U tom pogledu i u skladu s prijedlogom Komisije osnovni kriteriji koji se moraju uzeti u obzir kako bi se osigurao prisilni karakter novčane kazne s ciljem jednake i učinkovite primjene prava Zajednice su, u načelu, trajanje povrede, stupanj težine povrede i platežna sposobnost države članice.
In applying those criteria, regard should be had in particular to the effects of failure to comply on private and public interests and to the urgency of getting the Member State concerned to fulfil its obligations. 
Kod primjene tih kriterija treba posebno uzeti u obzir posljedice koje povreda ima na privatne i javne interese te žurnost zbog koje predmetna država članica treba ispuniti svoje obveze.
93 In the present case, having regard to the nature of the breaches of obligations, which continue to this day, a penalty payment is the means best suited to the circumstances. 
93 U ovom predmetu valja napomenuti da, s obzirom na prirodu povreda obveza koje još uvijek traju, novčana je kazna najbolje sredstvo primjereno okolnostima.
94 As regards the seriousness of the infringements and in particular the effects of failure to comply on private and public interests, the obligation to dispose of waste without endangering human health and without harming the environment forms part of the very objectives of Community environmental policy as set out in Article 130r of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 174 EC). 
94 S obzirom na težinu povreda te, posebno, posljedice koje povrede imaju na privatne i javne interese, obveza zbrinjavanja otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu sastavni je dio samih ciljeva politike Zajednice u području zaštite okoliša u skladu s člankom 130. R Ugovora o EZ-u (koji je nakon izmjene postao članak 174. UEZ-a).
The failure to comply with the obligation resulting from Article 4 of Directive 75/442 could, by the very nature of that obligation, endanger human health directly and harm the environment and must, in the light of the other obligations, be regarded as particularly serious. 
Povreda obveze koja proizlazi iz članka 4. Direktive 75/442 mogla bi zbog same prirode te obveze izravno ugroziti zdravlje ljudi i štetiti okolišu te se mora, s obzirom na ostale obveze, smatrati osobito teškom.
95 The failure to fulfil the more specific obligations of drawing up a waste disposal plan and drawing up, and keeping up to date, plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste, imposed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 respectively, must be regarded as serious in that compliance with those specific obligations was necessary in order for the objectives set out in Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319 to be fully achieved. 
95 Povreda posebnih obveza izrade planova za zbrinjavanje otpada te izrade i ažuriranja planova za zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđenih člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319 treba se smatrati teškom zato što je ispunjavanje tih posebnih obveza bilo potrebno kako bi se u potpunosti postigli ciljevi predviđeni u članku 4. Direktive 75/442 i članku 5. Direktive 78/319.
96 Thus, contrary to the Commission's submissions, the fact that specific measures have been taken, in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 78/319, to reduce the quantities of toxic and dangerous waste cannot have a bearing on the seriousness of the failure to comply with the obligation, under Article 12 of Directive 78/319, to draw up, and keep up to date, plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste. 
96 Stoga, suprotno tvrdnjama Komisije, činjenica da su poduzete posebne mjere u skladu s člankom 5. Direktive 78/319 kako bi se smanjile količine toksičnog i opasnog otpada ne može utjecati na težinu povrede obveze izrade i ažuriranja planova za zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada na temelju članka 12. Direktive 78/319.
97 In addition, account should be taken of the fact that it has not been proved that the Hellenic Republic has failed fully to comply with the obligation to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste from the area of Chania in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 78/319. 
97 Nadalje valja uzeti u obzir činjenicu da nije dokazano da je Helenska Republika u potpunosti povrijedila obvezu zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada iz područja prefekture Chania u skladu s člankom 5. Direktive 78/319.
98 As regards the duration of the infringement, suffice it to state that it is considerable, even if the starting date be that on which the Treaty on European Union entered into force and not the date on which the judgment in Case C-45/91 was delivered. 
98 S obzirom na trajanje povrede, dovoljno je navesti da je ona znatna čak i ako je počela s danom stupanja na snagu Ugovora o Europskoj uniji, a ne na dan donošenja gore navedene presude Komisija/Grčka.