natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, Annex III to the Protocol, to which Article 6(3) refers, lists all the factors of which account must be taken with a view to the issue of an authorisation. 
Osim toga, u Prilogu III. Protokolu, na koji se članak 6. stavak 3. odnosi, postoji popis svih čimbenika koje treba uzeti u obzir kod izdavanja odobrenja.
37 According to the Commission, the absence of measures, programmes and guidelines adopted jointly does not have the effect of paralysing implementation of the Protocol or preventing the issue of discharge authorisations, but increases the discretion of the Member States in issuing those authorisations, the exercise of which is open to judicial review. 
37 Prema mišljenju Komisije, izostanak zajednički usvojenih mjera, programa i smjernica nema učinak paraliziranja provedbe Protokola niti sprečava izdavanje odobrenja za ispuštanje, ali povećava marginu prosudbe države članice u izdavanju tih odobrenja, čije izvršenje podliježe sudskom nadzoru.
38 The Syndicat and the Commission add that the version of Article 6 which results from the amended Protocol and the other amendments to the annexes does not alter the preceding assessment. 
38 Koordinacija ribara i Komisija dodaju da verzija članka 6. koja proizlazi iz izmijenjenog Protokola i drugih izmjena prilogâ ne mijenja raniju ocjenu.
39 According to the settled case-law of the Court, a provision in an agreement concluded by the Community with a non-member country must be regarded as being directly applicable when, regard being had to its wording and to the purpose and nature of the agreement, the provision contains a clear and precise obligation which is not subject, in its implementation or effects, to the adoption of any subsequent measure (see inter alia Demirel, cited above, paragraph 14, and Case C-171/01 Wählergruppe Gemeinsam [2003] ECR I-4301, paragraph 54). 
39 Prema ustaljenoj sudskoj praksi Suda, odredbu iz sporazuma koji Zajednica sklopi s trećom zemljom valja smatrati izravno primjenjivom ako, s obzirom na njezin tekst te svrhu i prirodu sporazuma, odredba sadržava jasnu i preciznu obvezu koja u svojoj provedbi ili svojim učincima nije podređena intervenciji drugog, naknadnog akta (vidjeti osobito presude Demirel, gore navedenu, t. 14. i od 8. svibnja 2003., Wählergruppe Gemeinsam, C-171/01, Zb., str. I-4301., t. 54.).
40 In order to determine whether Article 6(3) of the Protocol satisfies those criteria, it is first necessary to examine its wording. 
40 Kako bi se odredilo ispunjava li članak 6. stavak 3. Protokola te kriterije, prvo treba preispitati njegov tekst.
41 That provision clearly, precisely and unconditionally lays down the obligation for Member States to subject discharges of the substances listed in Annex II to the Protocol to the issue by the competent national authorities of an authorisation taking due account of the provisions of Annex III. 
41 U tom smislu, valja utvrditi da se tom odredbom jasno, precizno i bezuvjetno utvrđuje obveza država članica da ispuštanja tvari navedenih u Prilogu II. Protokolu podvrgnu izdavanju odobrenja od strane nadležnih nacionalnih tijela uzimajući u obzir odredbe Priloga III.
42 As the Commission rightly points out, the fact that the national authorities have discretion in issuing authorisations under the criteria set out in Annex III in no way diminishes the clear, precise and unconditional nature of the prohibition on discharges without prior authorisation that results from Article 6(3) of the Protocol. 
42 Kao što to valjano navodi Komisija, činjenica da nacionalna tijela imaju marginu prosudbe u izdavanju odobrenja pod uvjetima navedenima u Prilogu III. ni na koji način ne umanjuje jasnoću, preciznost i bezuvjetnost zabrane ispuštanja bez prethodnog odobrenja koja proizlazi iz članka 6. stavka 3. Protokola.
43 That finding is supported by the purpose and nature of the Protocol. 
43 Takvo utvrđenje potkrepljuju svrha i narav Protokola.
44 It is clear from Articles 1 and 4 of the Protocol that its purpose is to prevent, abate, combat and eliminate pollution of the Mediterranean Sea area caused by discharges from rivers, coastal establishments or outfalls, or emanating from any other land-based sources within their territories. 
44 Iz članaka 1. i 4. Protokola proizlazi da je njegova svrha spriječiti, umanjiti, suzbiti i ukloniti onečišćenje u području Sredozemnog mora koje uzrokuju ispuštene otpadne vode [ispuštanja] iz rijeka, obalnih objekata ili morskih ispusta, ili koje potječe iz [bilo kojih] drugih izvora na kopnu unutar njihovih teritorija.
To that end, reiterating the undertakings given pursuant to Articles 4 and 8 of the Convention, Article 1 of the Protocol requires the Contracting Parties to take `all appropriate measures'. 
U tom cilju, ponovno naglašavajući obveze na temelju članaka 4. i 8. Konvencije, člankom 1. Protokola od ugovornih stranaka zahtijeva se da poduzmu „[sve] odgovarajuće mjere".
45 By establishing a system of prior authorisation by the competent national authorities for the discharge of the substances listed in Annex II to the Protocol, Article 6(3) contributes to the elimination by Member States of pollution from land-based sources in the area covered by the Protocol. 
45 Uspostavom sustava prethodnog odobrenja koje nadležna nacionalna tijela izdaju za ispuštanje tvari navedenih u Prilogu II. Protokolu, članak 6. stavak 3. doprinosi tome da države članice uklanjaju onečišćenje s kopna na području obuhvaćenom Protokolom.
Recognition of the direct effect of the provision in question can only serve the purpose of the Protocol, as recalled above, and reflect the nature of the instrument, which is intended, inter alia, to prevent pollution resulting from the failure of public authorities to act. 
Priznanje izravnog učinka predmetne odredbe može samo biti pozitivno u odnosu na svrhu Protokola kako je gore navedena, i odražavati vrstu instrumenta kojim se želi, između ostalog, spriječiti onečišćenje do kojeg dođe zbog toga što su javna tijela propustila djelovati.
46 The foregoing considerations also apply to the interpretation of Article 6(1) of the amended Protocol. 
46 Prethodna očitovanja primjenjuju se i na tumačenje članka 6. stavka 1. izmijenjenog Protokola.
The reference therein to `the relevant decisions or recommendations of the meetings of the Contracting Parties', which the competent national authorities must take into account, does not call in question the clear, precise and unconditional nature of the prohibition on discharges without authorisation. 
Upućivanje na „važne odluke ili preporuke sastanaka ugovornih stranaka" iz toga stavka, koje nadležna nacionalna tijela moraju uzeti u obzir, ne dovodi u pitanje jasnoću, preciznost i bezuvjetnost zabrane ispuštanja bez odobrenja.
In addition, the amendments approved by Decision 1999/801 in no way alter the purpose or nature of the Protocol. 
Osim toga, izmjene odobrene Odlukom 1999/801 ni na koji način ne mijenjaju svrhu ni narav Protokola.
47 In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that both Article 6(3) of the Protocol and Article 6(1) of the amended Protocol, following its entry into force, have direct effect, so that any interested party is entitled to rely on those provisions before the national courts. 
47 S obzirom na prethodno navedeno, na prvo pitanje valja odgovoriti da članak 6. stavak 3. Protokola te, nakon što stupi na snagu, i članak 6. stavak 1. izmijenjenog Protokola imaju izravni učinak tako da svaka zainteresirana strana ima pravo pozvati se na te odredbe pred nacionalnim sudovima. Područje primjene članka 6. stavka 3.
Scope of Articles 6(3) of the Protocol and 6(1) of the amended Protocol 
Protokola i članka 6. stavka 1. izmijenjenog Protokola
48 As the Syndicat, the French Government and the Commission have rightly observed, Annex III to the Protocol, referred to in Article 6(3) thereof, which lists the factors to be taken into account with a view to the issue of authorisations for the discharge of waste, itself refers to Annex II, which sets out the substances contained in the waste in question. 
48 Kako su se koordinacija ribara, francuska vlada i Komisija s pravom očitovali, i sam Prilog III. Protokolu, koji se spominje u članku 6. stavku 3. tog Protokola i navodi čimbenike koje treba uzeti u obzir s ciljem izdavanja ovlaštenja [odobrenja] za ispuštanje otpada, odnosi se na Prilog II. koji navodi tvari sadržane u otpadu o kojem je riječ.
These include, in paragraph 11, `substances which have, directly or indirectly an adverse effect on the oxygen content of the marine environment, especially those which may cause eutrophication' and, in paragraph 13, `substances which, though of a non-toxic nature, may become harmful to the marine environment or may interfere with any legitimate use of the sea owing to the quantities in which they are discharged'. 
Među njima su, u točki 11., „tvari koje izravno ili neizravno negativno utječu na sadržaj kisika u morskom okolišu, posebno one koje mogu uzrokovati eutrofikaciju" i, u točki 13. „tvari koje iako su netoksične, mogu postati opasne za morski okoliš ili koje mogu zbog ispuštene količine ometati zakonito korištenje mora".
49 Paragraphs 11 and 13 clearly do not make the requirement of prior authorisation for the discharge of the substances to which they refer conditional on their toxicity. 
49 Valja utvrditi da se u točkama 11. i 13. obveza ishođenja prethodnog odobrenja za ispuštanje tvari na koje se one odnose ne uvjetuje toksičnošću tih tvari.
50 The conclusion must be the same as regards the scope of Article 6(1) of the amended Protocol. 
50 Isto valja zaključiti i u pogledu područja primjene članka 6. stavka 1. izmijenjenog Protokola.
51 Pursuant to that provision, it is all `point source discharges into the Protocol Area [which includes, pursuant to Article 3(d) of the amended Protocol, marshes communicating with the Mediterranean Sea] and releases into water or air that reach and may affect the Mediterranean Area', and no longer merely discharges of the substances listed in Annex II to the Protocol, which will henceforth be `strictly subject to authorisation or regulation by the competent authorities', which are to take account inter alia of the provisions of the amended Protocol and of Annex II thereto. 
51 Na temelju te odredbe, odsada svako „ispuštanje iz točkastih izvora u područje Protokola [što uključuje, prema članku 3. točki (d) izmijenjenog Protokola, močvare povezane sa Sredozemnim morem] i oslobađanje u vodu ili zrak koje dospijeva [u] i može utjecati na područje Sredozemnog mora", a ne više samo ispuštanja tvari navedenih u Prilogu II. Protokolu, „strogo podliježu autorizaciji [odobrenju] ili propisu od strane nadležnih tijela", koja u obzir uzimaju između ostalog odredbe izmijenjenog Protokola i njegovog Priloga II.
52 In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the second question must be that both Article 6(3) of the Protocol and Article 6(1) of the amended Protocol must be interpreted as prohibiting, without an authorisation issued by the national competent authorities, the discharge into a saltwater marsh communicating with the Mediterranean Sea of substances which, although not toxic, have an adverse effect on the oxygen content of the marine environment. 
52 S obzirom na prethodno navedeno, na prvo pitanje valja odgovoriti da i članak 6. stavak 3. Protokola i članak 6. stavak 1. izmijenjenog Protokola treba tumačiti u smislu da zabranjuju da se, bez odobrenja koje izdaju nadležna nacionalna tijela, u slane močvare povezane sa Sredozemnim morem ispuštaju tvari koje, iako su netoksične, negativno utječu na sadržaj kisika u morskom okolišu.
53 The costs incurred by the French Government and by the Commission, which have submitted observations to the Court, are not recoverable. 
53 Troškovi podnošenja očitovanja Sudu koje su imale francuska vlada i Komisija ne nadoknađuju se.
THE COURT (Second Chamber), 
SUD (drugo vijeće),
in answer to the questions referred to it by the Cour de cassation by judgment of 6 May 2003, hereby rules: 
kao odgovor na prethodna pitanja koja mu je uputio Cour de cassation presudom od 6. svibnja 2003., odlučuje:
1. Article 6(3) of the Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution from Land-based Sources, signed in Athens on 17 May 1980, approved by Council Decision 83/101/EEC of 28 February 1983 and, following its entry into force, Article 6(1) of the Protocol as amended at the Conference of Plenipotentiaries held in Syracuse on 7 and 8 March 1996, which amendments were approved by Council Decision 1999/801/EC of 22 October 1999, have direct effect, so that any interested party is entitled to rely on those provisions before the national courts. 
1. Članak 6. stavak 3. Protokola o zaštiti Sredozemnog mora od onečišćavanja s kopna, potpisanog u Ateni 17. svibnja 1980., odobrenog Odlukom Vijeća 83/101/EEZ od 28. veljače 1983. te, nakon što stupi na snagu, članak 6. stavak 1. istog Protokola, kako je izmijenjen na Konferenciji punomoćnika održanoj u Sirakuzi 7. i 8. ožujka 1996., čije su izmjene odobrene Odlukom Vijeća 1999/801/EZ od 22. listopada 1999., imaju izravan učinak tako da svaka zainteresirana strana ima pravo pozvati se na te odredbe pred nacionalnim sudovima.
2. Those same provisions must be interpreted as prohibiting, without an authorisation issued by the national competent authorities, the discharge into a saltwater marsh communicating with the Mediterranean Sea of substances which, although not toxic, have an adverse effect on the oxygen content of the marine environment. 
2. Te iste odredbe treba tumačiti u smislu da zabranjuju da se, bez odobrenja koje izdaju nadležna nacionalna tijela, u slane močvare povezane sa Sredozemnim morem ispuštaju tvari koje, iako su netoksične, negativno utječu na sadržaj kisika u morskom okolišu. Objavljeno na javnoj raspravi u Luxembourgu 15. srpnja 2004.
6 December 2005 
6. prosinca 2005.
(Animal health and public health requirements - Composite feedingstuffs for animals - Indication of the exact percentage of the components of a product - Infringement of the principle of proportionality) 
„Zahtjevi u vezi sa zdravljem životinja i javnim zdravljem - Krmne smjese za životinje - Navođenje točnih postotaka sastojaka proizvoda - Povreda načela proporcionalnosti"
In Joined Cases C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04, 
U spojenim predmetima C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04,
REFERENCES for preliminary rulings under Article 234 EC, brought by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) (C-453/03), by the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) (C-11/04 and C-12/04) and by the Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (Netherlands) (C-194/04), by decisions of 23 October 2003, 11 November 2003 and 22 April 2004, received by the Court on 27 October 2003, 15 January 2004 and 26 April 2004 respectively, in the proceedings 
povodom zahtjeva za prethodnu odluku na temelju članka 234. UEZ-a, koje su uputili High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) (Visoki sud, Engleska i Wales, Odjel Queen's Bench, Upravni sud, Ujedinjena Kraljevina) (C-453/03), Consiglio di Stato (Italija) (C-11/04 i C-12/04) i Rechtbank's-Gravenhage (Nizozemska) (C-194/04), odlukama od 23. listopada 2003., 11. studenoga 2003. i 22. travnja 2004., koje je Sud zaprimio 27. listopada 2003., 15. siječnja 2004. odnosno 26. travnja 2004., u postupcima
The Queen, on the application of: 
The Queen, na zahtjev:
ABNA Ltd (C-453/03), 
ABNA Ltd (C-453/03),
Denis Brinicombe, 
Denis Brinicombe,
BOCM Pauls Ltd, 
BOCM Pauls Ltd,
Devenish Nutrition Ltd, 
Devenish Nutrition Ltd,
Nutrition Services (International) Ltd, 
Nutrition Services (International) Ltd,
Primary Diets Ltd 
Primary Diets Ltd
v Secretary of State for Health, 
protiv Secretary of State for Health,
Food Standards Agency, 
Food Standards Agency,
Fratelli Martini & C. SpA (C-11/04), 
Fratelli Martini & C. SpA (C-11/04),
Cargill Srl 
Cargill Srl
v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali, 
protiv Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali,
Ministero della Salute, 
Ministero della Salute,
Ministero delle Attività Produttive, 
Ministero delle Attività Produttive,
Ferrari Mangimi Srl (C-12/04), 
Ferrari Mangimi Srl (C-12/04),
Associazione nazionale tra i produttori di alimenti zootecnici (Assalzoo) 
Associazione nazionale tra i produttori di alimenti zootecnici (Assalzoo) protiv
v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali, 
Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali,
Ministero delle Attività Produttive 
Ministero delle Attività Produttive
and Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi) (C-194/04), 
i Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi) (C-194/04),
v Productschap Diervoeder, 
protiv Productschap Diervoeder,
composed of V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans and A. Rosas (Rapporteur), Presidents of Chambers, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet and M. Ilešič, Judges, 
u sastavu: V. Skouris, predsjednik, P. Jann, C. W. A. Timmermans i A. Rosas (izvjestitelj), predsjednici vijeća, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J. N. Cunha Rodrigues, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet i M. Ilešič, suci,
Advocate General: A. Tizzano, 
nezavisni odvjetnik: A. Tizzano,
Registrars: M.-F. Contet, Principal Administrator, and K. Sztranc, Administrator, 
tajnici: M.-F. Contet, glavna administratorica, i K. Sztranc, administratorica,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 30 November 2004, 
uzimajući u obzir pisani postupak i nakon rasprave održane 30. studenoga 2004.,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: 
uzimajući u obzir očitovanja koja su podnijeli:
ABNA Ltd, by D. Anderson QC and E. Whiteford, Solicitor, 
za ABNA Ltd, D. Anderson, QC, i E. Whiteford, solicitor,
Fratelli Martini & C. SpA, by F. Capelli, avvocato, and B. Klaus, Rechtsanwältin, 
za Fratelli Martini & C. SpA, F. Capelli, avvocato, i B. Klaus, Rechtsanwältin,
Ferrari Mangimi Srl, by E. Cappelli, P. De Caterini and A. Bandini, avvocati, 
za Ferrari Mangimi Srl, E. Cappelli, P. De Caterini i A. Bandini, avvocati,
Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi), by H. Ferment, advocaat, 
za Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi), H. Ferment, advocaat,
the United Kingdom Government, by M. Bethell (C-453/03), acting as Agent, and C. Lewis (C-453/03), Barrister, 
za vladu Ujedinjene Kraljevine, M. Bethell (C-453/03), u svojstvu agenta, uz asistenciju C. Lewisa (C-453/03), barrister,
the Italian Government, by I.M. Braguglia and M. Fiorilli (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, and by G. Albenzio (C-194/04), avvocato dello Stato, 
za talijansku vladu, I. M. Braguglia i M. Fiorilli (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata, i G. Albenzio (C-194/04), avvocato dello Stato,
the Netherlands Government, by S. Terstal (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), H. G. Sevenster (C-453/03 and C-194/04) and J.G.M. van Bakel (C-453/03 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za nizozemsku vladu, S. Terstal (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), H. G. Sevenster (C-453/03 i C-194/04) i J. G. M. van Bakel (C-453/03 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the Danish Government, by J. Molde (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agent, 
za dansku vladu, J. Molde (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenta,
the Greek Government, by K. Marinou (C-453/03) and S. Charitaki (C-11/04 and C-12/04), and by G. Kanellopoulos and V. Kontolaimos (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za grčku vladu, K. Marinou (C-453/03) i S. Charitaki (C-11/04 i C-12/04) te G. Kanellopoulos i V. Kontolaimos (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the Spanish Government, by M. Muñoz Pérez (C-453/03, C-11/04 and C-12/04) and J.M. Rodríguez Cárcamo (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za španjolsku vladu, M. Muñoz Pérez (C-453/03, C-11/04 i C-12/04) i J. M. Rodríguez Cárcamo (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the French Government, by G. de Bergues (C-453/03) and R. Loosli-Surrans (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za francusku vladu, G. de Bergues (C-453/03) i R. Loosli-Surrans (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the European Parliament, by E. Waldherr (C-453/03), and by M. Moore, G. Ricci (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04) and A. Baas (C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za Europski parlament, E. Waldherr (C-453/03) te M. Moore, G. Ricci (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04) i A. Baas (C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the Council of the European Union, by T. Middleton and F. Ruggeri Laderchi (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), and by A.-M. Colaert (C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za Vijeće Europske unije, T. Middleton i F. Ruggeri Laderchi (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04) te A.-M. Colaert (C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
the Commission of the European Communities, by B. Doherty and P. Jacob (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), and by C. Cattabriga (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 and C-194/04), acting as Agents, 
za Komisiju Europskih zajednica, B. Doherty i P. Jacob (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04) te C. Cattabriga (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04 i C-194/04), u svojstvu agenata,
1 The references for preliminary rulings centre essentially on the validity of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63, p. 23), in particular Article 1(1)(b) and 1(4) thereof. 
1 Zahtjevi za prethodnu odluku odnose se ponajprije na valjanost Direktive 2002/2/EZ Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 28. siječnja 2002. o izmjeni Direktive Vijeća 79/373/EEZ o prometu krmnih smjesa i stavljanju izvan snage Direktive Komisije 91/357/EEZ (SL L 63, str. 23.), a posebno njezina članka 1. stavka 1. točke (b) i članka 1. stavka 4.
2 Those references have been made in the context of the examination of requests by manufacturers of compound feedingstuffs for animals or representatives of that industry for the annulment or suspension of the rules adopted for the purpose of transposing in national law the contested provisions of Directive 2002/2. 
2 Zahtjevi su upućeni u okviru ispitivanja tužba koje su proizvođači krmnih smjesa za životinje ili predstavnici te industrije uložili za poništenje ili suspenziju propisa donesenog s ciljem prenošenja spornih odredaba Direktive 2002/2 u nacionalno pravo.
The legal framework 
Pravni okvir
3 Directive 2002/2 is based on Article 152(4)(b) EC, which provides: 
3 Direktiva 2002/2 temelji se na članku 152. stavku 4. točki (b) UEZ-a, kojim je predviđeno:
`The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives referred to in this Article through adopting: 
„Vijeće, odlučujući u skladu s postupkom iz članka 251. i nakon savjetovanja s Gospodarskim i socijalnim odborom te Odborom regija, doprinosi ostvarivanju ciljeva iz ovog članka usvajanjem: [...]
... (b) by way of derogation from Article 37, measures in the veterinary and phytosanitary fields which have as their direct objective the protection of public health;'. 
(b) odstupajući od članka 37., mjera u veterinarskom i fitosanitarnom području, kojima je neposredni cilj zaštita javnog zdravlja;". [neslužbeni prijevod]
4 It is appropriate to set out the following recitals in the preamble to Directive 2002/2: 
4 Valja navesti sljedeće uvodne izjave Direktive 2002/2:
`(2) As regards labelling, the purpose of Directive 79/373/EEC is to ensure that stock farmers are informed objectively and as accurately as possible as to the composition and use of feedingstuffs. 
„(2) U pogledu oznaka, cilj je Direktivom 79/373/EEZ osigurati objektivno i što točnije obavješćivanje uzgajivača o sastavu i upotrebi hrane za životinje.