natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- by means of the decision of 31st October 2001 it was decided that the hearing fixed for 8th November 2001 would not be held and the next hearing was fixed for 7th December 2001, 
-daje rješenjem od 31. listopada 2001.g. odlučeno da se ročište zakazano za dan 8. studeni 200l.g. neće održati, a iduće je ročište zakazano za dan 7. prosinac 200l.g.,
- at the hearing of 25th March 2002 a testimony was given by one witness and the plaintiff Bogdan Vidaković and the next hearing was fixed for 27th September 2002 in order to hear the testimony of the defendant, whilst the plaintiffs were invited to notify the above hearing to Ljeposava Milaković in order to attend it, 
-da je na ročištu 25. ožujka 2002.g. izveden dokaz saslušanjem jednog svjedoka te tuzitelj a Bogdana Vidakovica i iduće je zakazano za dan 27. rujan 2002.g., a radi sasiusanja tuzenice, time da su tužitelji pozvani obavijestili o tom rocistu Ljeposavu Milakovic radi pristupa na isto,
- on 17th October 2002 the request for the hearing of the witness Ljeposava Milaković and for the collection of her authentic signature was sent, 
-da je 17. listopada 2002.g. sačinjena zamolnica po pitanju saslušanja svjedoka Ljeposava Milakovic te uzimanja njezinih nespornih potpisa,
- by means of the decision of 28th November 2002 it was decided that the hearing fixed for 5th December 2002 would not be held and the next hearing was fixed for 27th January 2003, 
-da je rješenjem od 28. studenog 2002.g. odlučeno da se ročište zakazano za dan 5. prosinac 2002.g. neće održati, a iduće je zakazano za dan 27. siječanj 2003.g.,
- in her letter of 10th April 2003 the defendant gave a detailed statement and proposed, inter alia, that a handwriting analysis is performed on the signature of Ljeposava Milaković, and submitted detailed documentation, 
-da se tuženica u podnesku od 10. travnja 2003.g. detaljnije očitovala te predložila, između ostalog, izvođenje dokaza grafoloskim vjestačenjem potpisa Ljeposave Milakovic te dostavila opseznu dokumentaciju,
- the new hearing fixed for 8th May 1991 was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the defendant, 
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 8. svibnja 1991.g. odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za tuženicu,
- at the hearing of 27th January 2003 the defendant gave her testimony, whilst the plaintiffs filed a letter with detailed statement and the final claim; therefore the hearing was concluded and the next hearing was fixed for 15th May 2003 on which the testimony of a witness would be collected, 
-da je 27. siječnja 2003.g. održano ročiste na kojem je izveden dokaz saslušanjem tuzenice, a tužitelji su predali u spis podnesak kojim se detaljnije očituju i postavljaju konačan tužbeni zahtjev, slijedom čega je ročište odgođeno, a iduće zakazano za dan 15. svibanj 2003.g., na kojem je određeno izvesti dokaz saslušanjem jednog svjedoka,
- at the hearing of 27th September 2002 the plaintiffs submitted the statement of Ljeposava Milaković of 15th April 2002; the hearing concerned was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the defendant and the next hearing was fixed for 5th December 2002; at the same time it was laid down to collect the probatory statement of the witness Ljeposava Milaković by means of a request addressed to the foreign competent court and to collect her authentic signature, 
-da su tužitelji na rocistu 27. rujna 2002.g. predali izjavu Ljeposave Milakovic od 15. travnja 2002.g., koje ročište je odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za tuzenicu, a iduće je zakazano za dan 5. prosinac 2002.g., time da je istovremeno određeno izvođenje dokaza saslušanjem svjedoka Ljeposave Milakovic zamolbenim putem preko nadležnog suda u inozemstvu te poradi uzimanja njezinih nespornih potpisa,
- at the hearing held on 7th December 2001 a testimony was given by the plaintiff Bosiljka Kolarov, who informed the court in that occasion that the plaintiff Bogdan Vidaković lived in England and proposed that the defendant alone should be invited at the next hearing and that her former attorney should testify concerning the circumstances of the presentation of the supplement to the lawsuit; therefore the hearing was concluded and the next hearing was fixed for 25th March 2002, 
-da je na ročištu održanom 7. prosinca 2001.g. izveden dokaz saslušanjem tužitelj ice Bosiljke Kolarov, koja je na rocistu obavijestila sud o tome da tužitelj Bogdan Vidaković ima adresu stanovanja u Engleskoj te predložila da se na iduće ročište pozove samo tuženica te da se izvede dokaz saslušanjem njezina bivšeg punomoćnika na okolnost priloga uz tužbu, slijedom čega je ročište odgođeno i iduće zakazano za dan 25. ožujak 2002.g.,
- the hearing fixed for 15th May 2003 was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the witness Anica Schmit and the plaintiffs submitted their application to the file, 
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 15. svibanj 2003.g. odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za svjedoka (Anica Schmit), a tužitelji su u spis istom prilikom predali podnesak,
- on 27th November 2003 a letter from the Municipal court in Sombor was received, 
-da je 27. studenog 2003.g. primljen dopis Opcinskog suda u Somboru,
- by means of the decision of 3rd December 2003 the plaintiffs were requested to submit the authenticated translation of the above letter, which was complied with on 12th January 2004, 
-da su tužitelji rješenjem od 3. prosinca 2003.g. pozvani dostaviti oyjereni prijevod gore navedenog dopisa, sukladno kojem traženju su postupili 12. siječnja 2004.g.,
- at the hearing of 23rd February 2004 the plaintiffs proposed that another request is sent for the purpose of collecting the testimony of Ljeposava Milaković, wherefore the hearing was concluded and it was laid down to collect the probatory statement of Ljeposava Milaković by means of a request, 
-da su tužitelji na rocistu 23. veljače 2004.g. predložili ponovno uputiti zamolnicu radi saslušanja Ljeposave Milakovic, slijedom čega je isto ročiste odgođeno te određeno saslušanje svjedoka Ljeposave Milakovic zamolbenim putem,
- on 9th November 2004 the report drawn up on 14th September 2004 by the Municipal court in Apatin (collection of the testimony of Milaković Ljeposava) was received, 
-da je 9. studenog 2004.g. primljen zapisnik sastavljen 14. rujna 2004.g. pred Opštinskim sudom u Apatinu (saslušanje Milakovic Leposave),
- on 17th November 2005 the proceedings were suspended due to the absence of plaintiffs, who were duly summoned thereto, 
-da je 17. studenog 2005.g. nastupilo mirovanje postupka u ovoj pravnoj stvari (obzirom na izostanak uredno pozvanih tužitelja),
- on 22nd April 2005 the plaintiffs proposed the continuation of the proceedings, 
-da su tužitelji 22. travnja 2005.g. predložili nastavak postupka,
- at the hearing of 2nd April 2005 the attorney Božica Šegon appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs without the power of attorney, wherefore she was not permitted to represent the plaintiffs and it was decided that the next hearing would be fixed in writing, 
-da je na ročište 2. travnja 2005.g. z.a tužitelje pristupila odvjetnica Bozica Segon bez punomoći, kojoj nije dopušteno zastupanje bez punomoći, pa je određeno da ce se iduće ročište zakazati pisanim putem,
- on 12th October 2005 the case in question was assigned to another court, - the attorney Božica Šegon was invited to submit the power of attorney of the plaintiffs by means of the decision of 9th November 2005, 
-da je predmet preraspoređen u rad drugom sudu 12. listopada 2005.g., -da je odvjetnica Božica Segon rješenjem od 9. studenog 2005.g. pozvana u roku od 30 dana dostaviti punomoć za tužitelje,
- on 16th January 2006 the examination of the file Ps-992/97 was requested, 
-da je 16. siječnja 2006.g. zatražen priklop predmeta Ps-992/97,
- on 22nd February 2005 a copy of the report drawn up by the Municipal court in Apatin was sent via diplomatic channels to the plaintiffs to the address: Bačka Palanka, Đure Jakšića 1, 
-da je 22. veljače 2005.g. tužiteljima otpremljena diplomatskim putem preslika zapisnika sačinjenog pred Opštinskim sudom u Apatinu i to na adresu Backa Palanka, Dure Jaksica 1,
- on 12th January 2007 the court requested information to the Administration for international judicial assistance, cooperation and human rights as regards the delivery of the above document to the plaintiffs and on 12th April 2007 it received information that the request should be drawn up in the Croatian language and translated into English (authenticated translation), 
-da je 12. siječnja 2007.g. sud zatražio obavijest od Uprave za međunarodnu pravnu pomoć, suradnju i ljudska prava po pitanju dostave gore navedenog pismena za tuzitelje te 12. travnja 2007.g. dobio obavijest da je zamolnicu potrebno sastaviti na hrvatskoj jeziku i ovjerenom prijevodu na engleski jezik,
- on 6th June 2007 the court fixed a hearing for 10th January 2008 and sent the summons to the plaintiffs via diplomatic channels, 
-da je sud 6. lipnja 2007.g. zakazao ročište za dan 10. siječanj 2008.g., a poziv tužitelja za isto otpremio diplomatskim putem,
- on 19th April 2007 the court sent a query to the attorney Božica Šegon as to whether she would represent the plaintiffs in the concerned proceedings, 
-da je sud 19. travnja 2007.g. pozvao odvjetnicu Bozicu Segon da se oeituje zastupa li eventualno tužitelje u ovoj pravnoj stvari,
- by means of the decision of 20th August 2007 the court sent a query to the attorney Željko Perišić, who took over the legal practice of the former attorney of the defendant, as to whether he would represent the defendant in the concerned proceedings, in which case he should submit thereto the power of attorney, 
-da je sud rješenjem od 20. kolovoza 2007.g. pozvao odvjetnika Zeljka Petrisica, kao preuzimatelja odvjetničkog ureda ranijeg punomoćnika tuženice, da se očituje zastupa li tuženicu u ovoj pravnoj stvari te u tom slucaju dostavi urednu punomoć,
- on 10th October 2007 the notification was received that the documents addressed to the plaintiffs were not returned as undelivered, but at the same the parties did not return the signed delivery notes, whilst no proof of delivery could be obtained from the post services, 
-da je 10. listopada 2007.g. primljena obavijest da pismena za tužitelje nisu vraćena kao neuručena, a isto tako stranke nisu dostavile potpisane dostavnice, dok se od poste ne može dobiti dokaz obavljenoj dostavi,
- the hearing fixed for 10th January 2008 was postponed due to the undue delivery of the summons to the plaintiffs (delivery notes not returned), 
-da je ročište zakazano za dan 10. siječnja 2008.g. odgođeno zbog neuredne dostave za tuzitelje ( dostavnice nisu vracene ),
- on 10th January 2008 the court sent a query to the attorney Veljko Miljević as to whether he represented the plaintiffs in the concerned proceedings, having in mind the power of attorney from 1998 which nominates both Savo Barać and Veljko Miljević as attorneys of the plaintiffs (joint legal practice); the attorney Veljko Miljević responded thereto in writing on 25th January 2008 stating that he had never represented the plaintiffs in the concerned proceedings, nor had the plaintiffs nominated him as their attorney and that the concerned power of attorney, which contained in the header the name of the joint legal practice with the deceased attorney-at-law Savo Barać, had not existed since July 2000, 
-da je sud 10. siječnja 2008.g. uputio dopis odvjetniku Veljku Miljevicu u pravcu zastupa li eventualno tužitelje u ovoj pravnoj stvari, obzirom na sadržaj punomoći iz 1998.g. u kojoj su kao punomoćnici navedeni ne samo odvjetnik Savo Barac već i odvjetnik Veljko Miljevic ( zajednički odvjetnički ured ), na koje traženje je 25. siječnja 2008.g. dobiveno očitovanje odvjetnika Veljka Miljevica u pravcu da on nikada nije zastupao tužitelje u ovoj pravnoj stvari, niti su mu isti ikada potpisali punomoć, a da je spomenuta punomoć u zaglavlju imala navedenu oznaku Zajedničkog odvjetničkog ureda sa pokojnim odvjetnikom Savom Baracem, koji ured ne postoji još od srpnja2000.g.,
- on 30th January 2008 the court requested and on 18th February 2008 received the notification of the Croatian Chamber of Attorneys that the attorney-at-law Savo Barać (former attorney of the plaintiffs) had been deleted from the register of attorneys and that his legal practice had been taken over by the attorney Božica Šegon, 
-da je sud 30. siječnja 2008.g. zatražio, a 18. veljače 2008.g. dobio obavijest Hrvatske odvjetničke komore o tome da je odvjetnik Savo Barac ( raniji punomoćnik tužitelja) brisan iz imenika odvjetnika te da je preuzimatelj njegova ureda odvjetnica Bozica Segon,
- by means of the decision of 20th March 2008 the plaintiffs were invited to nominate an attorney for the reception of documents in the Republic of Croatia within 15 days, which was sent to them via diplomatic channels, 
-da su tužitelji rješenjem od 20. ožujka 2008.g. pozvani u roku od 15 dana postaviti punomoćnika za primanje pismena u Republici Hrvatskoj, koje rješenje im je otpremljeno diplomatskim putem,
- by means of the letter of 30th July 2008 the plaintiffs notified to the court the name of the attorney who would represent them in the concerned proceedings, that is the attorney Ibrica Zulfirkarpašić, 
-da su tužitelji podneskom od 30. srpnja 2008.g. obavijestili sud o punomoćniku koji ce ih u ovoj pravnoj stvari zastupali - odvjetnik Ibrica Zulfikarpasic,
- by means of the decision of 26th August 2008 the plaintiffs were instructed that it would be appropriate to deliver the historic land register extract for the real estate in question, which request was executed by the plaintiffs on 24th October 2008, 
-da je tužiteljima rješenjem od 26. kolovoza 2008.g. ukazano da bi bilo uputno dostaviti povijesni z.k. izvadak za predmetnu nekretninu, sukladno kojem traženju su tužitelji postupili 24. listopada 2008.g.,
- burden of proof in relation to administrative sanctions 
-teret dokaza u odnosu na upravne sankcije
Court control 
Sudska kontrola
According to the provision of the Article 12 paragraph 1 
Prema odredbi članka 12. stavak 1.
According to the provision of the Article 6, paragraph 1 
Prema odredbi članka 6. stavak 1.
- who has a right to appeal 
- tko se ima pravo žaliti
- special legal remedies 
- posebni pravni lijekovi
complaint (Article 
prigovor (čl.
decision cancellation and abrogation (Article 
poništavanje i ukidanje rješenja (čl.
- possibility of receiving legal assistance during the appeal process 
- mogućnosti dobivanja pravne pomoći tijekom žalbenog procesa
Compensation 
Odšteta
of LGAP, when a decision is cancelled in order to avoid severe and immediate danger for the lives and health of people and public safety, the party has a right to compensation of damages. 
ZUP-a, kad je rješenje ukinuto radi otklanjanja teške i neposredne opasnosti za život i zdravlje ljudi i javnu sigurnost, stranka ima pravo na naknadu stvarne štete.
If by omission to fulfil the duty stipulated in the contract, the public legal body suffers damages, this body has a right to require restitution from the party. 
Ako je neispunjivanjem obveze iz ugovora javnopravnom tijelu nastala šteta, to tijelo ima pravo od stranke potraživati naknadu štete.
of LGAP, if the party does not fulfil its obligations from an administrative contract, the public legal body will terminate the contract unilaterally. 
ZUP-a, ako stranka ne ispunjava obveze iz upravnog ugovora, javnopravno tijelo jednostrano će raskinuti upravni ugovor.
of LGAP, if a public legal body breaches contract obligations, the party can file a complaint. 
ZUP-a, zbog neispunjivanja ugovornih obveza javnopravnog tijela stranka može izjaviti prigovor.
STATE SECRETARY 
DRŽAVNI TAJNIK
According to the provision of the Article 155, paragraph 1 
Prema odredbu članka 155. stavak 1.
- is proportionality taken into account during coercive execution 
- uzima li se u obzir srazmjernost tijekom prisilne provedbe
of the Law on general administrative procedure (Official Gazette number 47/09- hereinafter: 
Zakona o općem upravnom postupku („Narodne novine“ broj 47/09 - u daljnjem tekstu:
LGAP) administrative matters are decided upon by a decision, with a possibility that the administrative act by which it is decided on an administrative matter can have a different name. 
ZUP) o upravnoj stvari odlučuje se rješenjem, s time da akt kojim se odlučuje o upravnoj stvari može imati i drugi naziv.
of the Constitution of Republic of Croatia (Official Gazette, number 41/01 - revised text and 79/10, hereinafter: 
Ustava Republike Hrvatske („Narodne novine“, broj 41/01-pročišćeni tekst, i 79/10-u daljnjem tekstu:
According to the provision of the Article5, paragraph 1. 
Prema odredbi članka 5. stavak 1.
- can assess the constitutionality of the law and the legality of other regulations which are no longer valid if no more than a year has passed from the end of validity until placement of request or proposal for initiation of procedure. 
- može ocjenjivati ustavnost zakona te ustavnost i zakonitost drugih propisa koji su prestali važiti ako od tog prestanka do podnošenja zahtjeva ili prijedloga za pokretanje postupka nije prošlo više od godine dana.
of LGAP, when based on regulations a party is ordered an obligation, such measures will be applied for fulfilment of the obligation which are more favourable for the party, if by applying such measures the purpose of the regulation is achieved. 
ZUP-a, kad se na temelju propisa stranci nalaže kakva obveza, prema njoj će se primjenjivati one mjere za ispunjenje obveze koje su za nju povoljnije, ako se takvim mjerama postiže svrha propisa.
of LGAP, during the procedure public legal bodies are obliged to ensure that parties involved protect and exercise their rights as easy as possible and take care that the exercise of their rights is not endangering the rights of third persons or in contradiction to public interest. 
ZUP-a, pri vođenju postupka javnopravna tijela dužna su strankama omogućiti da što lakše zaštite i ostvare svoja prava, vodeći pri tome računa da ostvarivanje njihovih prava ne bude na štetu prava trećih osoba niti u protivnosti s javnim interesom.
Of the Civil Servants Act (Official Gazette, number 92/05, 107/07 and 27/08) the principle is prescribed which prohibits discrimination and preferential treatment of citizens on any basis. 
Zakona o državnim službenicima („Narodne novine“, broj 92/05, 107/07 i 27/08) propisano je načelo zabrane diskriminacije i povlašćivanja građana po bilo kojoj osnovi.
Furthermore, Article 15 prescribes a general obligation of all civil servants to perform their duties according to the laws and to respect the legal and constitutional order of Republic of Croatia. 
Nadalje, članak 15. propisuje načelnu obvezu obavljanja dužnosti i obvezu postupanja državnih službenika u skladu sa zakonima te poštivanje pravnog i ustavnog poretka Republike Hrvatske.
Article 25 paragraph 1 prescribes the obligation of the civil servant to behave in a manner which will not diminish his/her reputation, nor the reputation of the civil service and not to put in doubt his impartiality in treatment. 
Članak 25. stavak 1. propisuje da se državni službenik mora ponašati tako da ne umanji svoj ugled i ugled državne službe te ne dovede u pitanje svoju nepristranost u postupanju.
Based on paragraph 2 of the same Article the Government of Republic of Croatia has elaborated in detail the rules of conduct of civil servants by the Code of Ethics of the Civil Servants (Official Gazette, number 49/06 and 134/08). For example the Article 8 paragraph 1 prescribes that the civil servant treats citizens professionally, impartially and with good manners, and Article 10 paragraph 1 
Na temelju stavka 2. istoga članka Vlada Republike Hrvatske je Etičkim kodeksom državnih službenika („Narodne novine“, broj 49/06 i 134/08) detaljno razradila pravila ponašanja državnih službenika (npr.članak 8. stavak 1. propisuje da službenik prema građanima postupa profesionalno, nepristrano i pristojno, a članak 10. stavak 1.
of the Code prescribes equality of treatment of all citizens by civil servants). 
Kodeksa propisuje jednakost postupanja službenika prema svim građanima).
of LGAP, a null and void decision has no legal effect and when its annulment is announced, legal effects of such decision are also considered null and void. 
ZUP-a, ništavo rješenje nema pravni učinak i u slučaju oglašivanja rješenja ništavim, smatraju se ništavim i pravni učinci tog rješenja.
of the Constitution, laws and other regulations of state bodies and bodies with public competence cannot have a retroactive effect. 
Ustava, zakoni i drugi propisi državnih tijela i tijela koja imaju javne ovlasti ne mogu imati povratno djelovanje.
According to Article 89, paragraph 5 only specific legal provisions can have a retroactive effect only due to especially justified reasons. 
Prema odredbi članka 89. stavak 5. samo iz posebno opravdanih razloga pojedine odredbe zakona mogu imati povratno djelovanje.
of LGAP, by which the principle of access to information and data protection is prescribed, public legal bodies are obligated to ensure access to necessary data, proscribed forms, website of the public legal body and offer other notices, advice and expert assistance. 
ZUP-a, kojom je propisano Načelo pristupa podacima i zaštite podataka, javnopravna tijela dužna su strankama omogućiti pristup potrebnim podacima, propisanim obrascima, internetskoj stranici javnopravnog tijela i pružiti im druge obavijesti, savjete i stručnu pomoć.
of the Access to Information Act (Official Gazette number 172/03- hereinafter: 
Zakona o pravu na pristup informacijama („Narodne novine“, broj 172/03-u daljnjem tekstu:
According to provisions of AIA, no time limit is prescribed for exercising the right to access to information. 
Prema odredbama ZOPPI-a nije propisano vremensko ograničenje ostvarivanja prava na pristup informacijama.
of AIA, the body of public government is obligated to issue a decision on refusal of the request to information to which the person who placed the request can appeal. 
ZOPPI-a, tijelo javne vlasti obvezno je donijeti rješenje o odbijanju zahtjeva za pružanjem informacije, na koje podnositelj zahtjeva može izjaviti žalbu.
- are there any regulations on providing information ex officio about creating policies if it is in the interest of good and democratic administration 
- postoje li propisi o pružanju informacija ex officio o kreiranju politike ukoliko je to u interesu dobre i demokratske uprave
of AIA, irrespectively of individual request by which the exercise of right to information is requested, the public bodies are obligated to announce in official journals or electronic media in an appropriate way especially: 
ZOPPI-a, neovisno o pojedinačnim zahtjevima kojima se traži ostvarivanje prava na pristup informaciji tijela javne vlasti obvezna su na prikladan način, u službenim glasilima ili na informatičkom mediju objaviti posebno:
2.) Information on their operation, including data on activities, organisation, costs of operation and sources of financing, 
2) informacije o svom radu, uključujući podatke o aktivnostima, organizaciji, troškovima rada i izvorima financiranja,
3) information on submitted requests, applications, petitions, suggestions and other activities which the nominees have undertaken towards the public government body. 
3) informacije o podnesenim zahtjevima, predstavkama, peticijama, prijedlozima, kao i drugim aktivnostima koje su korisnici poduzeli prema tijelu javne vlasti.
of AIA, the public government bodies with a competence to draft laws and secondary legislation are obligated to publish drafts of these acts and ensure that the nominees can provide their opinion thereabout in an appropriate time frame. 
ZOPPI-a, tijela javne vlasti u čijoj je nadležnosti izrada nacrta zakona i podzakonskih akata dužna su objavljivati nacrte tih akata te omogućiti ovlaštenicima da se u primjerenom roku o njima očituju.
Personal Data Protection Act regulates the protection of personal data of natural persons and supervision of the collection, processing and use of personal data in Republic of Croatia. 
Zakonom o zaštiti osobnih podataka uređuje se zaštita osobnih podataka o fizičkim osobama te nadzor nad prikupljanjem, obradom i korištenjem osobnih podataka u Republici Hrvatskoj.