natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Due to long-time lack of systematic care for the development of human resources the Ministry of Justice has been using for years the temporary work of the judicial officials at a series of key posts at the Ministry, including the positions of deputy and assistant to the Minister, and after appropriate legal changes positions of state secretaries and directors. 
Ministarstvo pravosuđa se zbog dugogodišnjeg nedostatka sustavne brige za razvoj vlastitih ljudskih potencijala godinama koristilo privremenim radom pravosudnih dužnosnika na nizu ključnih mjesta u Ministarstvu, koja su uključivala i mjesta zamjenika i pomoćnika ministara, a nakon odgovarajućih zakonskih promjena i mjesta Državnih tajnika i ravnatelja.
Judges and state attorneys that came on a temporary basis from the judicial bodies were not chosen according to the political affiliation criteria but because they possessed the necessary professional qualities. 
Suci i državni odvjetnici koji su privremeno dolazili iz pravosudnih tijela nisu bili birani po kriterijima političke podobnosti, već potrebnih stručnih kvaliteta.
The same is true for the officials temporarily allocated from particular state administration bodies. 
Isto vrijedi i za službenike privremeno raspoređene iz pojedinih tijela državne uprave.
During the reorganization and further strengthening of the Ministry in order o enable it to face the European challenges, it is necessary to systematically develop in-house human resources in order for them to gradually replace the human resources borrowed from the judicial or state bodies. 
Tijekom preustroja i daljnjeg jačanja Ministarstva s ciljem osposobljavanja za europske izazove, nužno je sustavno razvijati vlastite ljudske resurse, s ciljem da oni postupno zamjene ljudske resurse posuđene iz pravosudnih ili državnih tijela.
To this end, an international cooperation programs were arranged and implemented. as well as the internal program of strengthened communication and team work within the Ministry. 
U tu svrhu dogovoreni su i započeli su se provoditi međunarodni programi suradnje, ali i interni program snažnije komunikacije i timske suradnje unutar Ministarstva.
ACTION PLAN GOALS 
CILJEVI AKCIJSKOG PLANA
To create and implement the Ministry of Justice Human Resources Development Action Plan with anticipated short term and long term results: 
Sačiniti i provesti akcijski plan razvoja ljudskih potencijala u Ministarstvu pravosuđa, kojim se predviđaju kratkoročni i dugoročni rezultati:
In accordance with the Admission Pan fill the vacant posts at the Ministry necessary for regular functioning and carrying out of current activities, especially those referring to the EU accession; 
U skladu s Planom prijama popuniti upražnjena radna mjesta u Ministarstvu koja su neophodna za redovno funkcioniranje i obavljanje tekućih aktivnosti, poglavito onih koja se odnose na pristup Europskoj uniji;
Establishing human resources of the Ministry of Justice in accordance with modern principles stemming from the modern models of the human resources management. 
Stvaranje vlastitih kadrovskih potencijala Ministarstva pravosuđa prema suvremenim načelima koja proizlaze iz suvremenih modela upravljanja ljudskim potencijalima;
Temporary allocation of judicial officials and officials of other state administration bodies to be used only if circumstances demand it so in order to resolve specialist problems. The allocation itself is to be directed to advisory duties and posts, leaving the key managing roles for in-house human resources of the Ministry of Justice. 
Privremeno raspoređivanje pravosudnih dužnosnika i službenika iz drugih tijela državne uprave primjenjivati samo u nužnim okolnostima koja proizlaze iz potrebe razrješavanja specijalističkih problema, a samo raspoređivanje usmjeravati na savjetničke poslove i mjesta, prepuštajući ključne rukovodne uloge vlastitim kadrovskim potencijalima Ministarstva pravosuđa.
Minister Dražen Bošnjaković, m.p. 
Ministar Dražen Bošnjaković, v. r.
This Regulations shall enter into force on the eighth day from the date of its publishing in the Official Gazette. 
Ovaj Pravilnik stupa na snagu osmog dana od dana objave u »Narodnim novinama«.
The witness said: 
Svjedok je rekao:
(transcript, p. 
(transkript, str.1501.).
In Article 
U čl.
(transcript, p. 1501) 
(transkript, str.1501.).
„It must be on the 5th“ (transcript, p. 
„It must be on the 5th.“ (transkript, str.
According to UNHCR data (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 7/95, July 1995 i 10/95, October 1995) in Serbia and Montenegro in July 1995 
Prema podacima UNHCR-a (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 7/95, July 1995. i 10/95, October 1995.) u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori je u srpnju 1995.
(before the Operation Storm) there was 449000 displaced persons and refugees (including Serbs from the Republic of Croatia and from Bosnia and Herzegovina). 
(dakle prije Oluje) bilo 449.000 prognanika i izbjeglica (uključujući Srbe iz RH i BiH).
Notes related to Serbian counter-claim against the Republic of Croatia 
Bilješke vezane uz srbijansku protutužbu protiv RH
(MPO /Military Police Operation/ Storm, overview of witness testimonies before the ICTY and other notes) 
(VRA „Oluja“, osvrt na iskaze svjedoka pred ICTY i druge bilješke)
This is an analysis of testimonies of several witnesses before the ICTY regarding the course and aftermath of the Military Police Operation Storm. 
Ovo je analiza iskaza nekoliko svjedoka pred ICTY koji se odnose na tijek i posljedice vojno-redarstvene operacije „Oluja“.
The testimonies of the stated witnesses are cited once or more times in the counter-claim and they relate to one to two testimonies. 
Iskazi navedenih svjedoka navode se u tekstu Protutužbe jednom ili nekoliko puta i uglavnom se odnose na jedan do dva iskaza u svjedočenju.
However, by analysing particular testimonies it is possible to find certain discrepancies in relation to the Serbian counter-claim. 
Ipak, analizom teksta pojedinih svjedočenja moguće je naći i određene nepodudarnosti u odnosu na tekst srbijanske protutužbe.
In Article 1197 of the Serbian counter-claim, the defendant (Serbia) states that President Tuđman "clearly expressed his criminal goal" , especially apostrophized is the following sentence: 
U članku 1197. srbijanske protutužbe tuženik (Srbija) navodi kako je predsjednik Tuđman „vrlo jasno iznio svoj zločinački cilj“ a posebice se apostrofira rečenica:
„To strike so hard that Serbs will in essence disappear, that is, what we do not capture immediately is forced to capitulate in a few days time“. 
„Da nanesemo takve udarce da Srbi praktično nestanu, odnosno da ono što nećemo odmah osvojiti (zahvatiti) da mora kapitulirati u nekoliko dana“.
Here ( and later on in 1198) the defendant insists on the first part of this sentence (Serbs disappearing) which is not understandable without the rest of the sentence that refers to capitulation. 
Ovdje (i kasnije 1198.) tuženik inzistira na prvom dijelu rečenice (nestanak Srba) koji nije moguće razumjeti bez nastavka rečenice, koji se odnosi na kapitulaciju.
In my opinion it is very important to stress the second part of that sentence, as „capitulation“ can mean and it does mean the end of military resistance in this case of so called 
Držim kako je od velike važnosti istaknuti drugi dio rečenice, budući da „kapitulacija“ može značiti i znači prestanak vojnog otpora države ili vojne formacije (u ovom slučaju tzv.
Therefore the meaning of the utterance "Serbs" is purely military and political structures of Serb rebels. 
Stoga iskaz „Srbi“ znači isključivo vojne i političke strukture pobunjenih Srba.
In fact, in the text of the testimonies of certain witnesses the utterances regarding Serbs and Croats are used unevenly: sometimes they are used to signify the entire ethnic group and sometimes solely for military formations or, in turn, for civilian and military formations together. 
Naime, u tekstu svjedočenja pojedinih svjedoka iskazi o Srbima i Hrvatima upotrebljavaju se neujednačeno: ponekad se koriste za cjelokupnu etničku skupinu, ponekad i isključivo za vojne formacije ili, pak, za civile i vojne formacije zajedno.
In Article 1220, the defendant refers to testimonies of several witnesses regarding how the purpose of the shelling of Knin were not specific military targets but the abuse of civilians. 
U članku 1220. tuženik se poziva na više svjedoka kako granatiranje Knina nije bilo usmjerene na određene vojne ciljeve već za uznemiravanje civila.
Some of the witnesses claimed that there had been no military targets in Knin. 
Neki od svjedoka tvrdili su kako u Kninu nije bilo vojnih ciljeva.
However, during the witness questioning the existence of several military targets in Knin and the surrounding area was pointed out. 
Međutim, tijekom ispitivanja svjedoka ukazano je na postojanje nekoliko vojnih ciljeva u Kninu i okolici.
Joseph L.C.Bellerose's witness, 
Tako je svjedok Josepha L.C.
who stated in his testimony that there were several possible military targets in Knin, as follows: 
Bellerosea, koji je u svjedočenju rekao kako je postojalo nekoliko mogućih vojnih ciljeva u Kninu:
„For what I have seen in my time in Knin, the military target would have been the north camp, the camp adjacent to the UN compound and the RSK headquarters in downtown Knin.“ (transcript, 5871- 5872). 
„For what I have seen in my time in Knin, the military target would have been the north camp, the camp adjacent to the UN compound and the RSK headquarter in downtown Knin.“ (transkript, 5871- 5872.).
The mentioned existence of several relevant VRSK military targets in Knin is unavoidable when commenting on the shelling of Knin during the MPO Storm. 
Navedeno postojanje nekoliko relevantnih vojnih ciljeva VRSK u Kninu naprosto nije moguće zaobići u tumačenju granatiranja Knina tijekom VRA Oluja.
In Article 1227 the defendant refers to a testimony of witness Sava Mirković which states that on 4th of August 1995 the village of Polača was also shelled despite having no military targets. 
U članku 1227. tuženik navodi iskaz svjedoka Save Mirkovića kako je 4. kolovoza 1995. granatirano i selo Polača, koje nije imalo vojnih ciljeva.
During the testimony, Defence Counsel Mišetić presented information from the book by VRSK General Milisava Sekulić (Knin je pao u Beogradu /Knin fell in Belgrade/that, at the time, in the location called Sivo Brdo, next to the village of Polača, there was an artillery position of a unit of so called 
Tijekom svjedočenja, odvjetnik Mišetić je naveo podatke iz knjige generala VRSK Milisava Sekulića (Knin je pao u Beogradu, 2000.), kako je na lokalitetu Sivo Brdo, pokraj mjesta Polača u to vrijeme bio položaj topništva jedne postrojbe tzv.
Therefore, judging by the book, there was a military target in the village, although the witness, Mirković, claimed not to know anything about it. 
Mjesto je dakle imalo vojni cilj, sudeći prema navodu iz knjige, prema je svjedok Mirković tvrdio da s time nije upoznat.
1228 refers to the testimony of Herman Steenbergen, a UN military observer, who states that he was forced to evacuate his team on 4th of August 1995 because of the shelling of Gračac. 
1228. navodi se svjedočenje Hermana Steenbergena, vojnog promatrača UN-a kako je zbog granatiranja Gračaca 4. kolovoza 1995. bio prisiljen evakuirati svoj tim.
However, the witness did not state the scale of the shelling of Gračac. 
Međutim, svjedok nije precizirao razmjere granatiranja Gračaca.
Also it is evident from the transcript of the testimony that the witness continued with his regular activities already on the 5th of August. 
Također je iz transkripta svjedočenja vidljivo kako je svjedok već 5. kolovoza nastavio s redovitim aktivnostima.
In fact, when asked by Mr. 
Naime, na upit g.
Du Toit to explain his statement in the previous report he stated as follows: 
Du Toit-a, da pojasni navod iz ranijeg izvješća:
In Article 1234 it is stated that " Serbs were forced to leave Krajina during the Operation Storm". 
U članku 1234. navodi se kako su „Srbi bili prisiljeni napustiti Krajinu tijekom operacije Oluja“.
They attempt to establish the coercion in President Tuđman's words "Serbs must disappear". 
Prisila se pokušava utemeljiti u riječima predsjednika Tuđmana kako „Srbi moraju nestati“.
However, several convoys of civilians left the area of so called 
Međutim, nekoliko konvoja civila napustilo je područje tzv.
RSK /Republic of Serbian Krajina/ even before the Operation Storm. 
RSK i prije početka „Oluje“.
The Serbian leadership in so called 
Time je vodstvo Srba u tzv.
RSK thereby showed that the loss of power in the occupied areas must be followed by the exodus of the civilians. 
RSK pokazalo da gubitak vlasti na okupiranim područjima mora biti praćen i odlaskom civila.
We find confirmation of this in testimonies of several witnesses, for example witness Mira Grubor stated (transcript, p. 
Potvrdu nalazimo i u svjedočenjima nekoliko svjedoka, primjerice svjedokinja Mira Grubor izjavila je (transkript, str.
1388) that she had sent her five years old daughter to Serbia 6 days before the beginning of the MPO Storm and after the fall of Bosansko Grahovo. 
1388) kao je 6 dana prije početka VRA Oluje i nakon pada Bosanskog Grahova petogodišnju kćer poslala u Srbiju.
In several places it is stated that Serbs were victims when the civilians were pulled out of the convoys (Article 
Na nekoliko se mjesta navode i podaci o tomu kako su Srbi bili žrtve i tijekom izvlačenja civila u kolonama (čl.
For example in Article 
Primjerice u čl.
1233 it is stated that one of the extraction routes for Serbs was direction Topusko-Glina-Petrinja-Sisak and then along the highway via Lipovac towards Serbia. 
1233. navode se kako je jedan od smjerova izvlačenja Srba bio i pravac Topusko-Glina-Petrinja-Sisak i autocestom preko Lipovca za Srbiju.
The Serbian counter-claim does not contain the fact that the mentioned exodus of Serbs was the result of the decision of the leadership of local Serbs and the agreement between the two sides reached after the surrender of the of military forces of so called 
U srbijanskoj protutužbi ne navode se činjenice kako je navedeni izlazak Srba bio posljedica odluke vodstva lokalnih Srba i dogovora dviju strana nakon predaje vojnih snaga tzv.
RSK to Croatian Army in Banovina area. 
RSK Hrvatskoj vojsci na području Banovine.
Further on, Croatia provided the exit route and provisions at several rest posts. 
Nadalje, Hrvatska je osigurala prometnicu za izlazak, pomoć u namirnicama na nekoliko odmorišta.
The mentioned convoy was escorted by several representatives if various bodies (UN, EU and other), that certainly would not be there if this was the case of ethnic cleansing. 
Navedeni je konvoj pratilo i više predstavnika različitih tijela (UN, EU i sl.), koji zasigurno tamo ne bi bili ukoliko je bila riječ o etničkom čišćenju.
Also, there was a possibility to leave the convoy and return home, something only a few families did. 
Također je postojalo i mogućnost napuštanja konvoja i povratka kući, što je iskoristilo svega nekoliko obitelji.
The first section of the mentioned convoy consisted mostly of private vehicles with members of the military and the police of so called 
Prvi dio navedenog konvoja činila su osobna vozila ponajviše s predstavnicima vojske i milicije tzv.
1234 it is stated that between 180000 and 220000 was forced to leave Krajina. 
1234. navodi se kako je između 180.000 i 220.000 bilo prisiljeno napustiti Krajinu.
However, the real problem arises when attempting to determine the precise information on the number of Serb refugees from Croatia (in Serbia). 
Međutim, pravi problem nastaje kada se pokušaju utvrditi precizni podaci o broju izbjeglih Srba iz Hrvatske (u Srbiji).
However, several months after the Operation Storm, UNHCR numbers show 330000 of displaced persons and refugees in Serbia and Montenegro. 
Međutim, nekoliko mjeseci nakon Oluje, UNHCR u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori bilježi 330.000 prognanika i izbjeglica.
The significantly smaller number of refugees in Serbia, after the Operation Storm, indicates a lack of updating of the records as well as manipulation with the refugee issue by the Serbian government. 
Značajno smanjivanje broj izbjeglica u Srbiji, nakon proteka oluje, govori samo o neažurnom vođenju evidencije ali i o manipulaciji srbijanskih vlasti s izbjegličkom problematikom.
1237 the defendant stated that so far there is no precise number of persons killed during the MPO Storm because Croatian bodies „subsequently limited the movement of everyone, including the representatives of the international community in order to cover up the crimes“. 
1237. tuženik navodi do sada nije utvrđen precizan broj ubijenih osoba tijekom VRA Oluja budući da su hrvatska tijela „svima, uključujući predstavnike međunarodne zajednice, naknadno ograničila kretanjem područjem kako bi prikrile zločine“.
Referring to the testimony of the UN military observer Tor Munkelien (sometime his name is written as - Ton, last name- Minkuielien) dated 15.04.2008. 
Pri tomu se tuženik poziva na svjedočenje vojnog promatrača UN-a Tora Munkelien (ime se ponegdje navodi - Ton, prezime - Minkuielien) od 15.04.2008.
However, the transcript contains the following wording by Edward Russo for the Office of the Prosecutor :„During some of these patrols, Mr. 
Međutim u transkriptu se nalazi slijedeća formulacija koju je izrekao Edward Russo for the Office of the Prosecutor :„During some of these patrols, Mr.
Munkelien and his fellow UNMOs were restricted in their movements by HV soldiers or civilian police who had set up checkpoints on the main roads leading into Knin.“ However, during the testimony the witness also stated the following „We put it into the sitrep and I think we covered most of the areas. 
Munkelien and his fellow UNMOs were restricted in their movements by HV soldiers or civilian police who had set up checkpoints on the main roads leading into Knin.“ Međutim svjedok je tijekom izlaganja rekao i slijedeće „We put it into the sitrep and I think we covered most of the areas.
We were all over the area during the period that I was there.“ (transcript, p. 
We were all over the area during the period that I was there.“ (transkript, str.
Also, later in the text the witness responds to a following conclusion made by Attorney Cayley: 
Također, kasnije u tekstu svjedok je na konstataciju odvjetnika Cayleya:
„So it would be fair to say that you had freedom of movement subject to the security considerations that were agreed between the UNCRO military commander in Sector South and the Croatian authorities; yes?“ and the witness responds as follows: 
„So it would be fair to say that you had freedom of movement subject to the security considerations that were agreed between the UNCRO military commander in Sector South and the Croatian authorities; yes?“ rekao slijedeće:
„Yes, we had the freedom of movement“ (transcript, p. 
„Yes, we had the freedom of movement“ (transkript, str.
The witness also stated the following: 
Svjedok je također rekao i slijedeće:
"But even when it was restricted, we managed to find other roads and to reach the areas he we wished to visit“ (transcript, p. 
"But even when it was restricted, we managed to find other roads and to reach the areas he we wished to visit“ (transkript, str.
In line with the stated views of the witness, the initial position of the defendant, according to which the restriction of movement made it impossible to determine the precise number of victims after the MPO Storm, cannot be corroborated. 
Sukladno navedenim stajalištima svjedoka nije moguće potkrijepiti početni stav tuženika prema kojemu je ograničavanje kretanja onemogućilo utvrđivanje preciznog broja žrtava nakon VRA Oluja.
In Article 1273 the defendant states that 13 Serbs were killed in the village of Plavno. 
U članku 1273. tuženik navodi kako je 13 Srba ubijeno u mjestu Plavno.
Testimony of Aleksandar Tchernetsky is mentioned as one of the sources of information (transcript, p. 
Kao jedna od izvora informacije navodi se i svjedočenje Aleksandra Tchernetskyja (transkript, str.
3209) regarding the finding of a body of a man who was killed together with several sheep and a dog during the sweeping operation in the village of Plavno. 
3209.) o pronalasku tijela muškarca ubijenog zajedno s nekoliko ovaca i psom tijekom akcije čišćenja u mjestu Plavno.
However, during the testimony and cross examination by Defence Counsel Kuzmanović it was determined that the witness had not seen the body of the man, not did he have any information on the perpetrator of the nurser, as the witness himself stated: 
Međutim, tijekom svjedočenja i ispitivanja odvjetnika Kuzmanovića utvrđeno je kako svjedok nije vidio tijelo muškarca, niti raspolaže podatke o počinitelju ubojstva, budući da je sam svjedok rekao:
I didn't see the man“ (transcript, p. 
I didn't see the man“ (transkript, str.
3212) and that it was a member of his patrol that actually saw the body. 
3212) te da je tijelo muškarca vidio član njegove patrole.
Also, the witness was unable to confirm the existence of a written report on the mentioned finding of the body. 
Također, svjedok nije mogao potvrditi da je uopće postojalo pisano izvješće o navedenom pronalasku tijela muškarca.
Further on, in Article 
Nadalje, u čl.
1355 it is stated that the Croatian authorities settled Croats into Serbian houses. 
1355 navodi se kao su hrvatske vlasti naselile srpske kuće Hrvatima.
At the same time forgetting the fact that after the Operation Storm the exodus of the non-Serbian population from BiH continued. 
Pri tomu se zaboravlja kako je nakon Oluje nastavljen progon nesrpskog stanovništva iz BiH.
According to UNHCR data (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 10/95, October 1995.) between 14th of August and 21st of September 1995 22077 persons, mostly Croats and Bosniaks, were forced to leave north-east Bosnia and fled to Croatia (crossing Sava River and the village of Davor), and that many Croats and Bosniaks were forced to leave as they were forcefully removed from their homes. 
Prema podacima UNHCR-a (Information Notes on former Yugoslavia, UNHCR, 10/95, October 1995.) navodi se kako je između 14. kolovoza i 21. rujna 1995. iz sjeveroistočne Bosne u Hrvatsku (preko Save i mjesta Davor) protjerano 22.077 osoba, uglavnom Hrvata i Bošnjaka, te kako su mnogi Hrvati i Bošnjaci prisiljeni otići zbog protjerivanja iz njihovih kuća.
And they had to be housed as soon as possible. 
A njih je u kratkom roku negdje trebalo ipak smjestiti.
During that period, according to the same source, there was 463000 displaced persons and refugees (from BiH) in Croatia. 
U tom razdoblju, prema istom izvoru, u Hrvatskoj je bilo smješteno 463.000 prognanika i izbjeglica (iz BiH).
Several times Krajina is referred to as a separate entity, and in Article 
U nekoliko je navrata pisano kao o Krajini kao zasebnom entitetu, te u čl.
1390 it is concluded that so called 
1390. zaključeno kako je tzv.
RSK is „a specific geographic area in Croatia with primarily Serbian population, for whom this area represents a historical, religious and cultural seat“. 
RSK „specifično zemljopisno područje u Hrvatskoj pretežito naseljeno Srbima, kojima je to područje bilo povijesno, vjersko i kulturno središte“.
Further on , it is stated that "Krajina as such received a status of an UN protected zone." 
Dalje se kaže kako je „Krajina kao takva dobila status zone pod zaštitom UN-a.“
However, there is nothing that would suggest the existence of a separate entity, except for a rebel military force, that would provide to what is in an essence a historical category, (Venetian and Austrian military border intended for a creation of a protection zone with regard tot he rest of the empire and to prevent attacks from the Ottoman Empire) , meaning that it never objectively had. 
Međutim, ne postoji ništa što bi sugeriralo postojanje zasebnog entiteta, osim pobunjeničke vojne sile, koji jednoj povijesnoj kategoriji (mletačkoj i austrijskoj vojnoj krajini namijenjenoj stvaranju zaštitne zone prema ostatku carstva i prevenciji napada iz Otomanskog carstva) daje tumačenje koje ono objektivno nije imalo.