natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Decisions of the UK national office relating to the reputation of BOTOX are facts that may, if relevant, be taken into account by the General Court, despite the EUTM owners not being parties in those decisions (para. 78). 
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Odluke nacionalnog ureda Ujedinjene Kraljevine o ugledu žiga „BOTOX” činjenice su koje Opći sud može, ako su relevantne, uzeti u obzir iako nositelji žiga EU-a nisu stranke u tim odlukama (t. 78.).
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. The cancellation applicant did not submit sufficient proof of the reputation of its trade marks. 
(fig.) / FRESH & CLEAN et al. Podnositelj zahtjeva za brisanje nije podnio dovoljno dokaza ugleda svojih žigova.
According to the extracts from the 2001 survey conducted in Italy, although the level of ‘prompted recognition' stands at 86 %, the rate of ‘spontaneous recognition' is only 56 %. 
U skladu s izvatcima iz istraživanja provedenog 2001. u Italiji, iako je razina „izazvane prepoznatljivosti” bila 86 %, stopa „spontane prepoznatljivosti” iznosila je samo 56 %.
Moreover, no indication is given of the questions put to the people surveyed, making it impossible to determine whether the questions were really open and unassisted. 
Osim toga, nema pokazatelja o pitanjima postavljenima ispitanicima pa je nemoguće utvrditi jesu li pitanja zaista bila otvorena i bez pomoći.
The survey further fails to state for which goods the trade mark is known (para. 27). 
U istraživanju se ne navodi ni za koje je proizvode žig poznat (t. 27.).
27/03/2014, R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) The surveys do not seem to be carried out by the well-known GfK company, as the applicant argues, but rather by a Mr Philip Malivore who, according to his own declaration, is only ‘a former director of GfK'. 
27/03/2014,R 540/20132, Shape of a bottle (3D) Čini se da istraživanja ne provodi dobro poznato društvo GfK, kako tvrdi podnositelj prijave, nego g. Philip Malivore koji je, prema vlastitoj izjavi, samo „bivši direktor društva GfK”.
The Board is thus perplexed as to how a former employee of GfK can be authorised to use that company's logo on each and every page of the surveys when he is now ‘an independent market research consultant'. 
Vijeće je stoga izrazilo čuđenje zbog činjenice da je bivši zaposlenik društva GfK ovlašten upotrebljavati logotip društva na svakoj stranici istraživanja dok trenutačno obavlja djelatnost „neovisnog konzultanta u istraživanju tržišta”.
These facts cast considerable doubt on the source, reliability and independent nature of the surveys (para. 49). 
Tim se činjenicama dovode u pitanje izvor, pouzdanost i neovisnost istraživanja (t. 49.).
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA The survey submitted by the opponent does not provide conclusive information to demonstrate that the earlier sign is well known to the Spanish public for aerated waters as the interviewees were carefully selected on the basis of their origin, that is, Colombians resident in Spain. 
/ COLOMBIANA LA NUESTRA Ispitivanjem koje je podnositelj prigovora podnio ne pružaju se uvjerljive informacije kojima bi se dokazalo da je raniji žig dobro poznat španjolskoj javnosti za gazirane vode jer su ispitanici pomno odabrani na temelju njihova podrijetla, odnosno odabrani su Kolumbijci koji žive u Španjolskoj.
This is only a very small part of the population living in Spain. 
To je vrlo malen dio stanovništva Španjolske.
Moreover, the statements are not corroborated by conclusive data on the extent or turnover of the goods (para. 23). 
01/06/2011, R 1345/20101, Fukato Fukato (fig.) / DEVICE OF A SQUARE (fig.) etal.
That opinion poll was conducted by an independent company. 
To je ispitivanje javnog mnijenja provelo neovisno društvo.
In principle, samples of 1 000-2 000 interviewees are considered sufficient, provided they are representative of the type of consumer concerned. 
U načelu, uzorci od 1 000 do 2 000 ispitanika smatraju se dovoljnima uz uvjet da su reprezentativni za predmetnu vrstu potrošača.
The opponent's opinion poll was based on a sample of 500 interviewees, which is not sufficient in respect of the services for which reputation is claimed. 
Ispitivanje javnog mnijenja podnositelja prigovora temeljilo se na uzorku od 500 ispitanika, što nije dovoljno u odnosu na usluge za koje se zahtijeva ugled.
According to the opinion poll, the logo of the earlier mark has been associated especially with services in the financial and insurance fields. 
Prema ispitivanju javnog mnijenja logotip ranijeg žiga povezivao se prije svega s uslugama u području financija i osiguranja.
Since the opposition is only based on Class 42 with regard to the earlier European Union trade mark, it does not cover financial and insurance services. 
Budući da se prigovor temelji samo na razredu 42. u odnosu na raniji žig EU-a, njime nisu obuhvaćene financijske i osiguravateljske usluge.
Consequently, the opinion poll submitted is not suitable proof of the reputation of the opponent's European Union trade mark (para. 58). 
Stoga podneseno ispitivanje javnog mnijenja nije prikladan dokaz ugleda žiga EU-a podnositelja prigovora (t. 58.).
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. The many brand awards won by the mark were, together with the huge investment in advertising and the number of articles published in different publications, considered an important part of the evidence for reputation (para. 9(iii) and para. 27). 
25/01/2011, R 907/20092, O2PLS / O2 et al. Brojne nagrade za robnu marku koje su dodijeljene za žig, zajedno s golemim ulaganjima u oglašavanje i brojem članaka objavljenih u različitim izdanjima, smatrale su se važnim dijelom dokaza o ugledu (točka 9. podtočka iii.
Case No Comment 
i točka 27.).
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI & ABBRACCI The reputation of the earlier trade mark in Italy was proven by the copious amount of documentation submitted by the opponent, which included, inter alia, an article from Economy revealing that in 2005 the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark was one of the fifteen most counterfeited fashion brands in the world; an article published in Il Tempo on 05/08/2005, in which the ‘BACI & ABBRACCI' trade mark is mentioned alongside others, including Dolce & Gabbana, Armani, Lacoste and Puma, as being targeted by counterfeiters; an article published in Fashion on 15/06/2006, in which the trade mark is defined as ‘a true market phenomenon'; publicity campaigns from 2004 to 2007, with testimonials from entertainment and sports celebrities; and a market survey conducted by the renowned independent agency Doxa in September 2007, from which it emerges that the trade mark is ‘top of mind' in the fashion sector for 0.6 % of the Italian public (para. 35). 
10/03/2011, R 555/20092, BACI MILANO (fig.) / BACI & ABBRACCI Ugled ranijeg žiga u Italiji bio je dokazan opsežnom dokumentacijom koju je podnio podnositelj prigovora, a koja je, među ostalim, sadržavala članak iz časopisa Economy koji pokazuje da je 2005. žig „BACI & ABBRACCI” bio jedna od petnaest najkrivotvorenijih modnih marki na svijetu; članak objavljen u novinama Il Tempo 5. kolovoza 2005. u kojem se žig „BACI & ABBRACCI” spominje uz druge žigove, uključujući „Dolce& Gabbana”, „Armani”, „Lacoste” i „Puma”, kao meta krivotvoritelja; članak objavljen u časopisu Fashion 15. lipnja 2006., u kojem se žig definira kao „istinski tržišni fenomen”; reklamne kampanje od 2004. do 2007. sa svjedočanstvima poznatih osoba iz svijeta zabave i sporta; istraživanje tržišta koje je provela poznata neovisna agencija Doxa u rujnu 2007. iz kojeg proizlazi da je žig „prvi na pameti” u sektoru mode za 0,6 % talijanske javnosti (t. 35.).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed by 10/05/2012, C100/11 P The inclusion of a word in a dictionary is the expression of a fair amount of recognition on the part of the public. 
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potvrđeno 10/05/2012, C100/11 P Uvrštavanje riječi u rječnik izraz je velikog priznanja u određenom dijelu javnosti.
The references in the 2002 and 2003 editions of a number of dictionaries published in the United Kingdom constitute one of the items of evidence that may establish the reputation of the trade mark BOTOX in that country or amongst the English-speaking public of the European Union (paras 55 and 56). 
Upućivanja u izdanjima iz 2002. i 2003. niza rječnika objavljenih u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini jedan su od dokaznih materijala kojima se može utvrditi ugled žiga „BOTOX” u toj zemlji ili u javnosti engleskog govornog područja u Europskoj uniji (t. 55. i 56.).
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) The evidence submitted shows a high level of recognition of the mark on the Spanish market. 
14/04/2011, R 1272/20101, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al. (08/07/2015, T357/11 INTP, GRUPO BIMBO (fig.) / BIMBO et al., EU:T:2015:534) Priloženi dokazi pokazuju visoku razinu prepoznatljivosti žiga na španjolskom tržištu.
The total invoices on the Spanish tin-loaf market in 2004 amounted to EUR 346.7 million, of which the opponent's invoices amounted to EUR 204.9 million. 
Ukupni fakturirani iznos na španjolskom tržištu pakiranog kruha 2004. bio je 346,7 milijuna EUR, od čega su fakture podnositelja prigovora iznosile 204,9 milijuna EUR.
The invoices submitted cover advertisements on TV, as well as in newspapers and magazines. 
Podnesene fakture obuhvaćaju i reklame na televiziji te u novinama i časopisima.
Therefore, the reputation of ‘BIMBO' in Spain for industrially produced bread has been substantiated (para. 64). 
Stoga je ugled žiga „BIMBO” u Španjolskoj za industrijski proizveden kruh dokazan (t. 64.).
The Court did not address this point. 
Sud nije obradio ovu točku.
10/01/2011, R 43/20104, FFR (fig.) / CONSORZIO VINO CHIANTI CLASSICO (fig.), (05/12/2012, T143/11, F.F.R., EU:T:2012:645) The documents submitted show that the device of a black rooster has acquired reputation and will be associated with wines from the Chianti Classico region. 
10/01/2011, R 43/20104, FFR (fig.) / CONSORZIO VINO CHIANTI CLASSICO (fig.), (05/12/2012, T143/11, F.F.R., EU:T:2012:645) Podneseni dokumenti pokazuju da je logotip crnog pijetla stekao ugled te da će biti povezan s vinima iz regije Chianti-Classico.
The opponent provided several copies of advertisements in newspapers and magazines, showing its promotional activity, as well as independent articles displaying a black rooster in connection with the Chianti Classico region. 
Podnositelj prigovora dostavio je nekoliko primjeraka reklama u novinama i časopisima, čime je dokazao svoju promidžbenu aktivnost, kao i neovisne članke s prikazom crnog pijetla u vezi s regijom Chianti Classico.
However, given that the reputation only pertains to the device of a black rooster and given that this device is only one part of the earlier marks, serious doubts arise about whether reputation can be attributed to the marks as a whole. 
Ipak, imajući na umu da se ugled odnosi samo na logotip crnog pijetla i da je taj logotip samo jedan dio ranijeg žiga, javljaju se ozbiljne sumnje u pogledu toga može li se ugled pripisati žigovima u cjelini.
Moreover, for the same reason, doubt also arises about which marks the reputation could be attributed to, given that the opponent owns several marks. 
Osim toga, zbog istog se razloga javlja sumnja u pogledu toga kojim se žigovima može pripisati ugled s obzirom na to da podnositelj prigovora posjeduje nekoliko žigova (t. 26., 27.).
(paras 26 and 27). 
Sud nije procijenio dokaze ugleda.
BOTOX BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL 16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08 confirmed by 10/05/2012, C100/11 P 
BOTOX BOTOLIST i BOTOCYL 16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08 potvrđeno 10/05/2012, C100/11 P
The trade mark BOTOX had a reputation for pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of wrinkles in the United Kingdom on the filing date of the contested marks, which cover a range of goods in Class 3. 
Žig „BOTOX” imao je ugled kao farmaceutski pripravak za tretiranje bora u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini na dan podnošenja prijave za osporavane žigove kojima je obuhvaćen niz proizvoda iz razreda 3.
The General Court confirmed the Board's finding that there is a certain overlap between the goods, namely a low degree of similarity between the opponent's pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of wrinkles and the contested cosmetics among other creams, whereas the remaining contested goods, namely perfumes, suntanning milks, shampoos, bath salts, etc., are dissimilar. 
Opći sud potvrdio je nalaz Vijeća o tome da postoji određeno preklapanje između proizvoda, odnosno niska razina sličnosti između farmaceutskih pripravaka za tretiranje bora podnositelja prigovora i osporavane kozmetike među ostalim kremama, dok su ostali osporavani proizvodi, odnosno parfemi, mlijeka za sunčanje, šamponi, soli za kupanje itd. različiti.
Nevertheless, the goods at issue concern related market sectors. 
Ipak, predmetni proizvodi odnose se na povezane sektore tržišta.
The General Court confirmed the Board's finding that the relevant public - practitioners as well as the general public - would not fail to notice that both the trade marks applied for, BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL, begin with ‘BOTO-', which comprises almost the whole of the mark BOTOX, which is well known to the public. 
Opći sud potvrdio je nalaz Vijeća o tome da će relevantna javnost, i stručnjaci i šira javnost, primijetiti da oba žiga za koja je podnesena prijava, „BOTOLIST” i „BOTOCYL, počinju prefiksom „BOTO-”, što obuhvaća gotovo cijeli žig „BOTOX” koji je javnosti dobro poznat.
The General Court pointed out that ‘BOTO- is not a common prefix, either in the pharmaceutical field or in the cosmetic field and that it has no descriptive meaning. 
Opći sud istaknuo je da prefiks „BOTO-” nije uobičajeni prefiks, ni u području farmacije, ni u području kozmetike, te da nema opisno značenje.
Even if the sign BOTOX could be broken down into ‘bo' for ‘botulinum' and ‘tox' for ‘toxin', in reference to the active ingredient that it uses, that word would then have to be considered to have acquired a distinctive character, inherent or through use, at least in the United Kingdom. 
Čak ni kada bi se znak „BOTOX” mogao podijeliti u slog „bo” koji se odnosi na „botulinum” i slog „tox” koji se odnosi na „toksin”, čime se upućuje na aktivni sastojak koji se u njemu upotrebljava, trebalo bi se smatrati da je ta riječ, barem u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini, poprimila razlikovni karakter, svojstven ili stečen uporabom.
In light of all the relevant factors, the public would naturally be led to establish a link between the marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL and the reputed mark BOTOX (paras 65 to 79). 
S obzirom na sve relevantne čimbenike, javnost bi prirodno bila navedena na uspostavu veze između žigova „BOTOLIST” i „BOTOCYL” i žiga s ugledom „BOTOX” (t. 65. - 79.).
Earlier reputed sign EUTM application Case No 
Raniji znak s ugledom Prijava za žig EU-a Broj predmeta
The Board found that a link would be established between RED DOG and RED BULL because (i) the marks have some relevant common features, (ii) the conflicting goods in Classes 32-33 are identical, (3) the RED BULL mark is reputed, (iv) the RED BULL mark has acquired a strong distinctive character through use and (v) there might be a possibility of confusion (para. 19). 
Vijeće je utvrdilo da se između žigova „RED DOG” i „RED BULL” može uspostaviti veza zbog toga što i. žigovi imaju određene relevantne zajedničke značajke, ii. proizvodi u sukobu iz razreda 32. i 33. istovjetni su, iii. žig „RED BULL” ima ugled, iv. žig „RED BULL” uporabom je stekao snažan razlikovni karakter te v. može doći do mogućnosti dovođenja u zabludu (t. 19.).
It is reasonable to assume that the average consumer of beverages, who knows the reputed RED BULL mark and sees the RED DOG marks on the same kind of beverages would immediately recall the earlier mark. 
Razumno je pretpostaviti da će se prosječni potrošač napitaka koji prepoznaje žig s ugledom „RED BULL” kada vidi žig „RED DOG” na istoj vrsti napitaka odmah prisjetiti ranijeg žiga.
According to the Intel judgment, this is ‘tantamount to the existence of a link' between the marks (para. 24). 
Prema presudi „Intel”, to je „jednako postojanju veze” između žigova (t. 24.).
The trade marks are highly similar overall (para. 42). 
Žigovi su općenito vrlo slični (t. 42.).
Visually, all the letters of the earlier trade mark are present in the contested one, and the first four and final two are in the same order. 
Vizualno su sva slova ranijeg žiga prisutna u osporavanom žigu, a prva četiri i zadnja dva prikazana su istim redoslijedom.
There is visual similarity, especially since the public tends to pay more attention to the beginnings of words (paras 35 and 36). 
Postoji vizualna sličnost, posebno zbog toga što javnost veću pozornost obraća na početak riječi (t. 35. i 36.).
The identity of the first and last syllable, together with the fact that the middle syllables have the sound [g] in common, leads to a high degree of phonetic similarity (paras 38 and 39). 
Istovjetnost prvog i posljednjeg sloga, uz činjenicu da srednji slogovi imaju zajednički glas [g], dovodi do visoke razine fonetske sličnosti (t. 38. i 39.).
Neither of the signs has a meaning and, therefore, the public will not differentiate them conceptually (para. 40). 
Nijedan od znakova nema značenje te ih stoga javnost neće konceptualno razlikovati (t. 40.).
The earlier mark covers pharmaceuticals for the treatment of erectile dysfunctions in Class 5, whereas the contested mark covers non-alcoholic and alcoholic drinks in Classes 32 and 33. 
Ranijim su žigom obuhvaćeni farmaceutski proizvodi za tretiranje erektilnih disfunkcija iz razreda 5., dok su osporavanim žigom obuhvaćena bezalkoholna i alkoholna pića iz razreda 32. i 33.
The reputation of the earlier sign for the goods mentioned is not disputed. 
Ugled ranijeg znaka za spomenute proizvode nije doveden u pitanje.
The General Court found that although no direct connection can be established between the goods covered by the marks in dispute since they are dissimilar, an association with the earlier mark remains possible, taking into account the high degree of similarity between the signs and the strong reputation acquired by the earlier mark. 
Opći sud utvrdio je da, iako se ne može uspostaviti izravna veza između proizvoda koji su obuhvaćeni osporavanim žigovima jer su oni različiti, ostaje mogućnost asocijacije s ranijim žigom s obzirom na visoku razinu sličnosti između znakova te snažan ugled koji je stekao raniji žig.
Therefore, the General Court concludes that a link is likely to be established between the marks (para. 52). 
Stoga Opći sud zaključuje da će se vrlo vjerojatno uspostaviti veza između žigova (t. 52.).
As the contested trade mark is exclusively made up of the central and distinctive element of the earlier trade mark, namely the expression ‘royal shakespeare', the signs at issue are visually, phonetically and conceptually similar. 
Budući da se osporavani žig izričito sastoji od središnjeg i razlikovnog elementa ranijeg žiga, odnosno izraza „royal shakespeare”, predmetni su znakovi vizualno, fonetski i konceptualno slični.
Therefore, the average consumer will establish a link between those signs (para. 29). 
Stoga će prosječni potrošač uspostaviti vezu između tih znakova (t. 29.).
The earlier mark covers services in Class 41, including theatre productions, whereas the contested mark covers non-alcoholic and alcoholic drinks in Classes 32 and 33 and providing of food and drink, restaurants, bars, pubs, hotels; temporary accommodation in Class 42. 
Ranijim su žigom obuhvaćene usluge razreda 41., uključujući kazališnu produkciju, dok su osporavanim žigom obuhvaćena bezalkoholna i alkoholna pića iz razreda 32. i 33. te pružanje hrane i pića, restorani, barovi, pivnice, hoteli; privremeni smještaj iz razreda 42.
The General Court confirmed the Board's finding of the ‘exceptional' reputation of the earlier mark in the United Kingdom for theatre productions. 
Opći sud potvrdio je nalaz Vijeća o „iznimnom” ugledu ranijeg žiga u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini za kazališnu produkciju.
The relevant public for the contested trade mark is the same as the relevant public for the earlier trade mark, namely the public at large (para. 58). 
Relevantna javnost za osporavani žig jednaka je relevantnoj javnosti za raniji žig, odnosno široj javnosti (t. 58.).
Although the contested goods in Classes 32-33 do not appear to be directly and immediately linked to the opponent's theatre productions, there is a certain proximity and link between them. 
Iako osporavani proizvodi iz razreda 32. i 33. naizgled nisu izravno i neposredno povezani s kazališnom produkcijom podnositelja prigovora, postoji određena bliskost i veza između njih.
The General Court refers to the judgment of 04/11/2008, T161/07, Coyote ugly, EU:T:2008:473, § 31-37, where a certain similarity between entertainment services and beer was found due to their complementarity. 
Opći sud upućuje na presudu od 04/11/2008, T161/07, Coyote ugly, EU:T:2008:473, § 31-37 u kojoj je utvrđena određena sličnost između zabavljačkih usluga i piva zbog njihove komplementarnosti.
The General Court added that it is common practice, in theatres, for bar and catering services to be offered either alongside and during the interval of a performance. 
Opći sud dodao je da je uobičajena praksa u kazalištima da se ugostiteljske usluge nude tijekom izvedbi i u pauzama.
Moreover, irrespective of the above, in view of the established reputation of the earlier trade mark, the relevant public, namely the public at large in the United Kingdom, would be able to make a link with the intervener when seeing a beer with the contested trade mark in a supermarket or in a bar (para. 60). 
Nadalje, bez obzira na prethodno navedeno i imajući u vidu utvrđeni ugled ranijeg žiga, relevantna javnost, odnosno šira javnost u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini, moći će uspostaviti vezu s posrednikom kada ugleda pivo s osporavanim žigom u supermarketu ili baru (t. 60.).
The signs only have a certain degree of visual and aural similarity. 
Znakovi imaju samo određenu razinu vizualne i zvučne sličnosti.
The Board confirms that the reputation of the earlier marks has been proven solely for distribution of energy services. 
Vijeće potvrđuje da je ugled ranijeg žiga dokazan samo za distribuciju energetskih usluga.
These services are completely different from the goods for which protection is requested in Classes 18, 20, 24 and 27. 
Te su usluge potpuno drukčije od proizvoda za koje se traži zaštita u razredima 18., 20., 24. i 27.
The relevant section of the public is the same, given that the services for which a reputation has been proven, namely distribution of energy services, are aimed at the general public and the goods in dispute are also aimed at the average consumer who is reasonably observant and circumspect. 
Relevantan je dio javnosti isti, uzimajući u obzir da su usluge za koje je ugled dokazan, odnosno distribucija energetskih usluga, namijenjene široj javnosti i da su osporavani proizvodi jednako tako namijenjeni prosječnom potrošaču koji je razumno pažljiv i obazriv.
However, even if the relevant section of the public for the goods or services for which the conflicting marks are registered is the same or overlaps to some extent, those goods or services may be so dissimilar that the later mark is unlikely to bring the earlier mark to the mind of the relevant public. 
Ipak, čak i ako je relevantan dio javnosti za proizvode ili usluge za koje su registrirani suprotstavljeni žigovi isti ili se u određenoj mjeri preklapa, ti proizvodi i usluge mogu biti toliko različiti da je malo vjerojatno da će kasniji žig relevantnu javnost podsjetiti na raniji žig.
It is even less likely that, when intending to purchase a bag or item of furniture, the relevant public will link these goods to a trade mark that is very well known, but for services in the energy sector (paras 69 and 79). 
Još je manje vjerojatno da će pri kupnji torbe ili komada namještaja relevantna javnost te proizvode povezati sa žigom koji je dobro poznat, ali se odnosi na usluge u energetskom sektoru (t. 69. i 79.).
Earlier reputed signs EUTM application Case No 
Raniji znakovi s ugledom Prijava za žig EU-a Broj predmeta