natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
20/05/2011, R 2132/20102, SUSURRO (fig.) / SUSURRO Nine invoices concerning the sale of wine in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, showing that over a period of 36 months, goods marketed under the earlier mark and worth EUR 4 286.36 were sold, as well as an undated sample of a product label, were not considered sufficient proof of genuine use of a Spanish trade mark registered for alcoholic drinks (except beers) in Class 33. 
20/05/2011, R 2132/20102, SUSURRO (fig.) / SUSURRO Devet računa za prodaju vina iz 2005., 2006., 2007. i 2008., koji pokazuju prodaju proizvoda stavljenih na tržište pod ranijim žigom tijekom razdoblja od 36 mjeseci u vrijednosti od 4 286,36 EUR, kao i primjerak etikete proizvoda bez datuma, ne smatra se dostatnim dokazom o stvarnoj uporabi španjolskog žiga koji je registriran za alkoholna pića (osim piva) u razredu 33.
The evidence showed that the sales of wine had been made in a small, very provincial, part of Spain. 
Dokazima je pokazano da je vino prodano u malom provincijskom dijelu Španjolske.
For a country with over 40 million inhabitants, the amount sold of a relatively cheap wine was found to be too small to create or preserve an outlet for goods (wine) that are consumed in large quantities by the average Spanish consumer. 
Za zemlju od više od 40 milijuna stanovnika količina relativno jeftino prodavanog vina smatra se premalom za stvaranje ili očuvanje prodajnog mjesta za proizvode (vino) koje prosječni španjolski potrošač konzumira u velikim količinama.
07/07/2011, R 908/20102, ALFA-REN / ALPHA D3 et al. Table of sales figures for ALFACALCIDOL products in Lithuania between 2005 and 2008, indicating products sold by Teva Corp. under the trade mark ‘ALPHA D3' (source: IMS health database, Lithuania); an undated copy of packaging for a product ‘ALPHA D3' (undated); and a copy of an advertisement for ‘ALPHA D3' products sold in Lithuania (not translated) were found insufficient to show genuine use of the mark in Lithuania. 
07/07/2011, R 908/20102, ALFA-REN / ALPHA D3 et al. Tablica prodajnih rezultata za proizvode ALFAKACIDOL u Litvi od 2005. do 2008. u kojoj su navedeni proizvodi koje je poduzeće Teva Corp. prodalo pod žigom „ALPHA D3” (izvor: zdravstvena baza podataka IMS-a, Litva), nedatirana preslika ambalaže proizvoda „ALPHA D3” (bez datuma) i preslika oglasa za proizvode „ALPHA D3” koji su prodani u Litvi (bez prijevoda) smatraju se nedostatnim dokazom stvarne uporabe žiga u Litvi.
It could not be seen from the evidence submitted whether the marked goods were actually distributed and, if so, the quantities involved. 
Iz podnesenih dokaza nije se moglo vidjeti jesu li proizvodi koji su stavljeni na tržište stvarno distribuirani i ako jesu, u kojoj količini.
16/03/2011, R 820/20101, BE YOU / BEYU Sales of goods with profits below EUR 200 during the 9month period of use were not considered sufficient proof of genuine use of the opposing mark in respect of the goods in Class 14. 
16/03/2011, R 820/20101, BE YOU / BEYU Prodaja proizvoda sa zaradom nižom od 200 EUR tijekom razdoblja od 9 mjeseci nije bila dostatan dokaz o stvarnoj uporabi žiga protiv kojeg se podnosi prigovor u odnosu na proizvode u razredu 14.
06/04/2011, R 999/20101, TAUTROPFEN CHARISMA (fig.) / CHARISMA Eleven invoices showing that 13 units of perfumery goods were sold in Spain between 2003 and 2005, for a total amount of EUR 84.63, were deemed as insufficient proof of genuine use of the sign. 
06/04/2011, R 999/20101, TAUTROPFEN CHARISMA (fig.) / CHARISMA Jedanaest računa koji pokazuju da je 13 jedinica parfimerijskih proizvoda prodano između 2003. i 2005. u Španjolskoj u ukupnom iznosu od 84,63 EUR smatralo se nedostatnim dokazom o stvarnoj uporabi žiga.
Account has been taken of the fact that the goods were intended for daily use and available at a very affordable price. 
U obzir su uzete činjenice da su proizvodi namijenjeni za svakodnevnu uporabu i dostupni po vrlo pristupačnoj cijeni.
27/10/2008, B 1 118 605, Viña la Rosa Photocopies of three independent wine guides mentioning the opponent's trade mark (without further explanation as to the volume, edition, publisher, etc.) were not considered sufficient to prove use for wines. 
27/10/2008, B 1 118 605, Viña la Rosa Preslike tri odvojena vinska vodiča u kojima se spominje žig podnositelja prigovora (bez daljnjeg objašnjenja o svesku, izdanju, izdavaču itd.) nisu se smatrale dostatnim dokazom uporabe vina.
21/06/1999, B 70 716, Oregon The Opposition Division found an invoice for 180 pairs of shoes as insufficient to prove genuine use. 
21/06/1999, B 70 716, Oregon Odjel za prigovore smatrao je da je račun za 180 pari cipela nedostatan za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe.
30/01/2001, B 193 716, Lynx As evidence of use the opponent submitted two invoices, for a total amount of 122 items of clothing, and four undated labels with no indication of what goods they were to be affixed to. 
30/01/2001, B 193 716, Lynx Podnositelj prigovora kao dokaz je podnio dva računa za ukupno 122 odjevna predmeta i četiri etikete bez datuma i naznake o kakvom je proizvodu riječ.
The Opposition Division considered them insufficient. 
Odjel za prigovore smatrao ih je nedostatnima.
16/11/2011, T308/06, Buffalo Milke, EU:T:2011:675 Nine invoices dated between April 2001 and March 2002, representing sales of around EUR 1 600 (with a turnover figure barely above EUR 1 000 000 per year) and showing that items were delivered to different customers in small quantities (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 or 144 pieces), for widely used products like shoe polish, in the largest European market, Germany, with approximately 80 million potential consumers, were deemed as providing evidence of use that objectively is such as to create or preserve an outlet for polishing cream and leather conditioner. 
16/11/2011, T308/06, Buffalo Milke, EU:T:2011:675 Smatralo se da devet računa s datumima između travnja 2001. i ožujka 2002. koji pokazuju prodaju u iznosu od oko 1 600 EUR (s prometom koji jedva premašuje 1 000 000 EUR godišnje) i isporuku predmeta različitim potrošačima u malim količinama (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 ili 144 komada) za proizvode za široku potrošnju kao što je laštilo za cipele u Njemačkoj, najvećem europskom tržištu koje broji oko 80 milijuna potencijalnih potrošača, pruža dokaze o uporabi koja je objektivno bila takva da stvori ili očuva prodajno mjesto za kremu za poliranje i omekšivač za proizvode od kože.
Furthermore, the volume of sales, in relation to the period and frequency of use, was deemed to be significant enough not to be considered merely token, minimal or notional for the sole purpose of preserving the rights conferred by the mark. 
Osim toga, smatralo se da je opseg prodaje, u odnosu na razdoblje i učestalost uporabe, dovoljno značajan da se ne smatra samo simboličnim, minimalnim ili apstraktnim, s isključivom svrhom očuvanja prava koja proizlaze iz žiga.
Confirmed by the General Court (para. 68) 
Navedeno je potvrdio i Opći sud (t. 68.).
10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338 Evidence (invoices, lists of sales) proving that the intervener sold 4 hollow-fibre oxygenators with detachable hard-shell reservoirs in Finland in 1998, 105 in 1999 and 12 in 2001, for a total amount of EUR 19 901.76, was deemed sufficient proof of genuine use of the EUTM registered for oxygenators with integrated pump; controllers for integrated pump; regulating devices of air pressure for integrated pump; suction pumps; blood flow meters in Class 10 (paras 48, 60). 
10/09/2008, T325/06, Capio, EU:T:2008:338 Dokazi (računi, popisi prodaje) kojima se dokazuje da je posrednik prodao 4 oksigenatora od šupljih vlakana s odvojivim spremnicima s čvrstom stijenkom 1998. u Finskoj, 105 oksigenatora 1999. i 12 oksigenatora 2001. u ukupnom iznosu od 19 901,76 EUR, procijenjeni su dostatnim za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe žiga EU-a koji je registriran za oksigenatore s integriranom pumpom; regulatore za integriranu pumpu; regulatore tlaka zraka za integriranu pumpu; usisne pumpe; mjerače protoka krvi, u razredu 10. (t. 48., 60.).
27/09/2007, T418/03, La Mer, EU:T:2007:299 Ten invoices over a period of 33 months, relating to several product ranges, the packaging of which bears the trade mark concerned, with numbers very far apart (22 214 for the invoice of 03/01/1995, 24 085 for that of 04/05/1995, 24 135 for that of 10/05/1995 and 31 348 for that of 26/03/1997), showing that the sales were made to different persons, were deemed as permitting the inference that they had been submitted merely by way of illustration of total sales but not as showing that the trade mark was used publicly and outwardly rather than solely within the undertaking that owned the earlier trade mark or within a distribution network owned or controlled by that undertaking. 
27/09/2007, T418/03, La Mer, EU:T:2007:299 Deset računa izdanih tijekom razdoblja od 33 mjeseca za nekoliko asortimana proizvoda, čija je ambalaža bila označena predmetnim žigom, koji su se sastojali od vrlo različitih iznosa (22 214 za račun od 3. siječnja 1995., 24 085 za račun od 4. svibnja 1995., 24 135 za račun od 10. svibnja 1995. i 31 348 za račun od 26. ožujka 1997.) i koji pokazuju da je prodaja izvršena za različite osobe, smatralo se dostatnima za izvođenje zaključka da su računi podneseni samo kao prikaz ukupne prodaje, a ne za pokazivanje da je žig bio u uporabi javno i prema van umjesto isključivo u poduzeću koje je bilo nositelj ranijeg žiga ili unutar distribucijske mreže u vlasništvu ili pod kontrolom tog poduzeća.
Nevertheless, the sales effected, while not considerable, were deemed as constituting use that objectively was such as to create or preserve an outlet for the products concerned and entailing a volume of sales that, in relation to the period and frequency of use, was not so low as to allow the conclusion that the use was merely token, minimal or notional for the sole purpose of preserving the rights conferred by the mark (paras 87-90). 
Ipak, iako neznačajna, izvršena se prodaja smatrala uporabom koja je objektivno bila takva da stvori ili očuva prodajno mjesto s predmetnim proizvodima i ukupnim opsegom prodaje koji, u odnosu na razdoblje i učestalost uporabe, nije bio tako slab da se izvede zaključak da je uporaba bilo samo simbolična, minimalna ili apstraktna i s isključivom svrhom očuvanja prava koja proizlaze iz žiga (t. 87. - 90.).
The Board's findings were confirmed by the General Court. 
Opći sud potvrdio je zaključke vijeća.
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Evidence of the sale to a single customer in Spain of concentrated fruit juices during a period of 11.5 months, with a total volume of sales of EUR 4 800, corresponding to the sale of 293 cases of 12 items each, was considered sufficient use of the earlier Spanish trade mark (paras 68-77). 
11/05/2006, C416/04 P, Vitafruit, EU:C:2006:310 Dokazi o prodaji koncentriranih voćnih sokova jednom kupcu u Španjolskoj tijekom razdoblja od 11,5 mjeseci, s ukupnim prometom u visini 4 800 EUR, što odgovara prodaji 293 kutije od po 12 sokova svaka, smatraju se dostatnima za dokazivanje uporabe ranijeg španjolskog žiga (t. 68. - 77.).
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 As evidence of use, the opponent (merely) provided several catalogues for end consumers, featuring the relevant trade mark on clothing articles. 
08/07/2010, T30/09, Peerstorm, EU:T:2010:298 Podnositelj prigovora kao dokaz o uporabi dostavio je (samo) nekoliko kataloga za krajnje potrošače u kojima je predmetni žig prikazan na odjevnim predmetima.
The Court held that ‘…it is true that those catalogues provide no information on the quantity of goods actually sold by the intervener under the trade mark PETER STORM. 
Sud je smatrao da „[...] je istina da u katalozima nema nikakvih informacija o količini proizvoda koje je posrednik stvarno prodao pod žigom PETER STORM.
However, it is necessary to take into account … the fact that a large number of items designated by the trade mark PETER STORM were offered in the catalogues and that those items were available in more than 240 shops in the United Kingdom for a significant part of the relevant period. 
Ipak, treba uzeti u obzir [...] činjenicu da je velik broj predmeta označenih žigom PETER STORM bio ponuđen u katalozima i da su ti predmeti bili dostupni u više od 240 trgovina u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini tijekom znatnog dijela relevantnog razdoblja.
Those factors support the conclusion, in the context of a global assessment … that the extent of its use was fairly significant' (paras 42 to 43). 
Tim se čimbenicima podupire zaključak u kontekstu cjelovite procjene [...] da je opseg njegove uporabe bio prilično značajan” (t. 42. i 43.).
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY The sale of approximately 1 000 miniature toy vehicles was considered sufficient extent of use in light of the products being sold mainly to collectors at a high price in a particular market. 
04/09/2007, R 35/20072, DINKY Smatralo se da prodaja oko 1 000 minijaturnih vozila igračaka upućuje na dostatan opseg uporabe proizvoda koji se na određenom tržištu prodaje po visokoj cijeni i pretežno kolekcionarima.
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR The sale of 500 kg of milk proteins for a total value of EUR 11 000 was considered sufficient to prove genuine use for milk proteins for human consumption. 
11/10/2010, R 571/20091, VitAmour / VITALARMOR Prodaja 500 kilograma mliječnih bjelančevina u ukupnoj vrijednosti od 11 000 EUR smatrala se dostatnom za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe mliječnih bjelančevina za prehranu ljudi.
In view of the nature of the products, which are not consumer goods but ingredients for use by the food processing industry, the amount and values shown did demonstrate a market presence above the threshold required. 
S obzirom na narav proizvoda koji nisu namijenjeni širokoj potrošnji, već je riječ o sastojcima za uporabu u industriji prerade hrane, prikazana količina i vrijednosti dokazuju prisutnost na tržištu iznad potrebnog praga.
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Eleven invoices made out to different undertakings in various regions of Spain, showing that the proprietor of the mark sold, in the relevant period and under the mark, 311 containers of the product, in different sizes, for a net amount of EUR 2 684, were deemed sufficient to prove genuine use of a mark registered for preservatives against deterioration of wood in Class 2. 
27/07/2011, R 1123/20104, Duracryl / DURATINT et al. Jedanaest računa koji glase na različita poduzeća u različitim dijelovima Španjolske i koji pokazuju da je nositelj žiga u relevantnom razdoblju pod žigom prodao 311 spremnika proizvoda različitih veličina za neto iznos od 2 684 EUR, smatralo se dostatnima za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe žiga koji je registriran za konzervanse protiv propadanja drva u razredu 2.
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 An annual turnover of more than EUR 10 million over several years was claimed for medical preparations. 
01/02/2011, B 1 563 066 Nositelj je tvrdio da je ostvario godišnji promet medicinskih preparata veći od 10 milijuna EUR tijekom nekoliko godina.
The corresponding invoices (one per relevant year) only proved actual sales of about EUR 20 per year. 
Odgovarajućim računima (jedan za svaku relevantnu godinu) dokazana je samo stvarna prodaja od oko 20 EUR godišnje.
In an overall assessment, and in the context of further material submitted, such as price lists, a sworn statement, packaging and advertising material, the Office found this sufficient to prove genuine use. 
U cjelokupnoj procjeni i uz dodatni podneseni materijal, kao što su cjenici, prisegnute izjave, ambalaža i reklamni materijal, Ured je navedeno smatrao dostatnim dokazom stvarne uporabe.
26/01/2001, B 150 039 The Opposition Division regarded evidence of sales of around 2 000 furry toy animals in a high-priced market sector as sufficient. 
26/01/2001, B 150 039 Odjel za prigovore smatrao je dostatnima dokaze o prodaji oko 2 000 plišanih igračaka životinja u tržišnom sektoru koji karakteriziraju visoke cijene.
18/06/2001, B 167 488 The opponent submitted one invoice referring to the sale of one high-precision laser cutting machine for FRF 565 000, a catalogue describing its performance and some photographs depicting the product. 
18/06/2001, B 167 488 Podnositelj prigovora podnio je jedan račun koji se odnosi na prodaju jednog laserskog uređaja za rezanje visoke preciznosti za 565 000 FRF, katalog u kojemu se opisuju svojstva uređaja i nekoliko fotografija s prikazom proizvoda.
The Opposition Division considered them as sufficient evidence taking into account the nature of the product, the specific market and its considerably high price. 
Odjel za prigovore smatrao ih je dostatnim dokazima, uzimajući u obzir narav proizvoda, specifično tržište i njegovu poprilično visoku cijenu.
Case No Registered mark Actual use Comment 
Broj predmeta Registrirani žig Stvarna uporaba Napomena
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Relevant goods were beverages in Classes 29 and 32. 
12/12/2014, T105/13, TrinkFix Drinkfit Relevantni proizvodi bili su pića iz razreda 29. i 32.
The labels on bottles of beverages are narrow, so it is not unusual for a word mark to be written on two lines (para. 47). 
Etikete na bocama pića uske su te stoga nije neuobičajeno da se verbalni znak piše u dva reda (t. 47.).
Registered form Actual use Case No 
Registrirani oblik Stvarna uporaba Broj predmeta
‘In the present case the mark CRISTAL appears clearly four times on the neck of the bottle marketed by the intervener and twice on the main label, accompanied by the symbol ®. 
„Žig CRISTAL u tom se slučaju jasno pojavljuje četiri puta na vratu boce koju je posrednik stavio na tržište i dva puta na glavnoj etiketi, a prati ga simbol ®.
On the neck, that mark is separate from the other elements. 
Žig na vratu boce odvojen je od ostalih elemenata.
In addition, the mark CRISTAL appears alone on the boxes in which bottles of the mark CRISTAL are marketed. 
Osim toga, žig CRISTAL pojavljuje se sam na kutijama u kojima se prodaju boce sa žigom CRISTAL.
Equally, on the invoices produced by the intervener reference is made to the term “cristal” with the mention “1990 coffret”. 
Jednako tako, na računima posrednika navedeno je upućivanje na izraz ,cristal' nakon kojeg slijedi ,1990 coffret'.
It should be noted that the mark CRISTAL thus identifies the product marketed by the intervener' (para. 35). 
Treba napomenuti da žig CRISTAL u ovom slučaju identificira proizvod koji posrednik prodaje” (t. 35.).
‘As regards the mention “Louis Roederer” on the main label, it merely indicates the name of the manufacturer's company, which may provide a direct link between one or more product lines and a specific undertaking. 
„Kada je riječ o navodu ,Louis Roederer' na glavnoj etiketi, on samo upućuje na naziv poduzeća proizvođača, kojim se može uspostaviti izravna veza između jedne ili više proizvodnih linija i određenog poduzeća.
The same reasoning applies to the group of letters “lr”, which represents the initials of the intervener's name. 
Isto obrazloženje primjenjuje se i na skupinu slova ,lr' koja predstavlja inicijale imena posrednika.
As pointed out by [the Office], joint use of those elements on the same bottle does not undermine the function of the mark CRISTAL as a means of identifying the products at issue' (para. 36). 
Kao što je [Ured] istaknuo, zajednička uporaba tih elemenata na istoj boci ne umanjuje svrhu žiga CRISTAL kao sredstva za identificiranje predmetnih proizvoda” (t. 36.).
‘Furthermore, [the Office's] finding that the use of the word mark together with the geographical indication “Champagne” cannot be considered to be an addition capable of altering the distinctive character of the trade mark when used for champagne must be endorsed. 
„Osim toga, treba podržati zaključak [Ureda] da se uporaba verbalnog žiga zajedno sa zemljopisnom oznakom ,Champagne' ne može smatrati dodatkom koji može promijeniti razlikovni karakter žiga ako se on upotrebljava za šampanjac.
In the wine sector the consumer is often particularly interested in the precise geographical origin of the product and the identity of the wine producer, since the reputation of such products often depends on whether the wine is produced in a certain geographical region by a certain winery' (para. 37). 
Potrošač u sektoru vina često je posebno zainteresiran za precizno zemljopisno podrijetlo proizvoda i identitet proizvođača vina zato što ugled takvih proizvoda često ovisi o tome proizvodi li određena vinarija vino na nekom određenom zemljopisnom području” (t. 37.).
Registered form Actual use Case No 
Delegirane uredbe o žigu EU-a]” (t. 38.).
L.114 is a French trade mark registered for pharmaceutical products in Class 5. 
L.114 francuski je žig koji je registriran za farmaceutske proizvode u razredu 5.
The Court found that: 1) the missing full-stop between the capital letter ‘L' and the number 114 constituted a minor difference that did not deprive earlier mark L.114 of its distinctive character (para. 53). 
Sud je utvrdio da: izostavljena točka između velikog slova „L” i broja 114 čini manju razliku koja nije utjecala na umanjenje razlikovnog karaktera ranijeg žiga L.114 (t. 53.).
2) ‘Lehning' was the house mark. 
„Lehning” je bio matični žig.
The fact that earlier mark ‘L.114' was used together with that house mark did not alter its distinctive character within the meaning of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR] (para. 53). 
Činjenica da se raniji žig „L.114” upotrebljavao zajedno s tim matičnim žigom nije mijenjala razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga u smislu članka 15. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe (EZ) 207/2009 [koji je postao članak 18. stavak 1. točka (a) Uredbe o žigu EU-a] (t. 53.).
YGAY YGAY together with a number of other verbal and figurative elements 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai 
YGAY YGAY zajedno s više drugih verbalnih i figurativnih elemenata 24/09/2008, R 1695/20071, I GAI (fig.) / YGAY et al.; potvrđeno 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai
In the Board's decision (confirmed 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) it was pointed out that the trade mark YGAY appears in many photographs on both the label and the box in which the bottle is sold. 
U odluci vijeća (potvrđenoj 21/09/2010, T546/08, i Gai, EU:T:2010:404, § 19, 20) istaknuto je da se žig „YGAY” pojavljuje na mnogobrojnim fotografijama na etiketi i na kutiji u kojoj se prodaje boca.
On the labels, the trade mark in question is separated from the other elements. 
Predmetni je žig na etiketama odvojen od ostalih elemenata.
On some labels, it appears on its own, beneath the phrase MARQUES DE MURRIETA, written in large bold letters. 
Na nekim se etiketama pojavljuje sam, ispod natpisa MARQUES DE MURRIETA, napisanog velikim podebljanim slovima.
On others, the phrase BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA is written in small letters in the upper part, while the elements CASTILLO YGAY are written in large, stylised letters across the label. 
Na ostalim etiketama natpis BODEGAS MARQUES DE MURRIETA napisan je malim slovima u gornjem dijelu, a elementi CASTILLO YGAY napisani su velikim stiliziranim slovima preko etikete.
The trade mark YGAY also appears on its own or together with the phrase CASTILLO YGAY on the boxes in which the bottles are sold. 
Žig YGAY pojavljuje se i samostalno ili zajedno s natpisom CASTILLO YGAY na kutijama u kojima se prodaju boce.
Reference is also made, on the invoices submitted by the opponent, to the trade mark YGAY, along with general information such as the year of production and origin, etc. It follows, therefore, that the sign YGAY functions as the trade mark identifying the goods, wine, sold by the opponent (para. 15). 
Na računima koje je podnio podnositelj prigovora stoji i upućivanje na žig YGAY, uz opće informacije kao što je godina proizvodnje i podrijetlo itd. Iz toga proizlazi da žig YGAY funkcionira kao žig kojim se identificiraju proizvodi, odnosno vino, koje podnositelj prigovora prodaje (t. 15.).
Mark No 1 Mark No 2 18/04/2013, C12/12, Colloseum Holding 
2 18/04/2013, C12/12, Colloseum Holding
Levi Strauss is the proprietor of the two EUTMs reproduced above. 
Levi Strauss nositelj je dvaju prethodno reproduciranih žigova EU-a.