natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The documents submitted as proof of use refer only to female wedding dresses. 
Dokumenti koji su podneseni kao dokaz o uporabi odnose se samo na ženske vjenčanice.
The element “LA SPOSA” is a common term, which will be understood by the Italian and Spanish public as “the bride” and has a weak distinctive character for the goods in issue, namely wedding dresses. 
Element ,LA SPOSA' uobičajeni je naziv koji će talijanska i španjolska javnost razumjeti kao ,nevjesta' i on ima slab razlikovni karakter u pogledu predmetnih proizvoda, odnosno vjenčanica.
The opponent itself, in its price list “tarifa de precios” which is drafted in various official languages of the EC, translated this term into the respective languages; underneath the term “LA SPOSA”, the terms “novia” are mentioned in the Portuguese version of the list, “bride” in the English version, “Braut” in the German version, and so on. 
Sam podnositelj prigovora u svojem je cjeniku ,tarifa de precios', koji je izrađen na raznim službenim jezicima Europske zajednice, taj izraz preveo na predmetne jezike, pri čemu se u portugalskoj verziji troškovnika ispod izraza ,LA SPOSA' spominje izraz ,novia', u engleskoj verziji ,bride', u njemačkoj verziji ‚Braut' i tako dalje.
This shows that even the respondent itself understands the term “LA SPOSA” as a reference to the consumer targeted, namely the bride' (para. 18). 
To pokazuje da čak i sam tuženik izraz ,LA SPOSA' shvaća kao upućivanje na ciljanog potrošača, odnosno nevjestu” (t. 18.).
‘Therefore the element “SP” at the beginning of the earlier mark is a distinctive element and cannot be disregarded. 
„Prema tome, element ,SP' na početku ranijeg žiga predstavlja razlikovni element koji se ne može ignorirati.
This element cannot be neglected, first and foremost as it is placed at the beginning of the mark. 
Taj se element ne može zanemariti, prvenstveno zato što se nalazi na početku žiga.
Also, it is meaningless and distinctive on its own, in all the languages of the European Union' (para. 19). 
Osim toga, on nema značenje i razlikovan je sam po sebi, na svim jezicima Europske unije” (t. 19.).
‘[T]he omission of the letter “SP” in the word “LA SPOSA” or “LA SPOSA COLLECTION” is not an acceptable variation of the earlier mark but a significant modification to the distinctive character of the mark. 
„[I]zostavljanje slova ,SP' u riječima ,LA SPOSA' ili ,LA SPOSA COLLECTION' nije prihvatljiva varijanta ranijeg žiga, već značajna izmjena razlikovnog karaktera žiga.
The documents submitted by the respondent are insufficient to prove that the mark “SP LA SPOSA” has been put to genuine use' (para. 26). 
Dokumenti koje je podnio tuženik nisu dostatni za dokazivanje stvarne uporabe žiga ,SP LA SPOSA'” (t. 26.).
In this case the Court examined whether the omission, in the form as used, of the expression ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' alters the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered. 
U tom je predmetu Sud ispitivao mijenja li izostavljanje izraza „La Sabiduría del Sabor”, u obliku u kojem se žig upotrebljava, razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga kako je registriran.
Firstly, the words 'Sabores de Navarra' (tastes/flavours of Navarra) refer to sensations or impressions evoking a region of northern Spain. 
Prvo, riječi „Sabores de Navarra” (okusi Navarre) odnose se na osjećaje ili dojmove koji u misli dozivaju regiju u sjevernoj Španjolskoj.
Thus, the elements can be perceived by the Spanish-speaking public as descriptive of the geographical origin of the goods in question. 
Stoga javnost sa španjolskog govornog područja može doživjeti elemente kao opisne u pogledu zemljopisnog podrijetla predmetnih proizvoda.
Moreover, the word ‘sabores' (favours) may be perceived as an indication of product quality, i.e. flavour. 
Osim toga, riječ „sabores” (okusi) može se doživjeti kao oznaka kvalitete proizvoda, tj. okusa.
It follows that the elements ‘Sabores de Navarra' must be regarded as essentially descriptive. 
Iz toga proizlazi da se elementi „Sabores de Navarra” u suštini moraju smatrati opisnima.
The elements ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor', given the meaning of the word ‘La Sabiduría' (wisdom) and the word ‘sabor' (flavour), constitutes a play of words and cannot be considered descriptive. 
Elementi „La Sabiduría del Sabor”, s obzirom na značenje riječi „Sabiduría” (mudrost) i „sabor” (okus) predstavljaju igru riječi i ne mogu se smatrati opisnima.
It follows that the distinctiveness of the earlier mark comes essentially from the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor'. 
Iz toga slijedi da razlikovnost ranijih žigova u suštini proizlazi iz riječi „La Sabiduría del Sabor”.
The Court found that in the present case, the omission of the words ‘La Sabiduría del Sabor' in the form used alters the distinctive character of the mark (paras 31-45). 
Sud je utvrdio da u tom predmetu izostavljanje riječi „La Sabiduría del Sabor” u obliku u kojem se žig upotrebljava mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 31. - 45.).
‘The earlier trade marks are strongly characterised by the presence of the figurative element. 
„Figurativni elementi značajni su u ranijim žigovima.
However, the documents submitted during the opposition proceedings and, even if they were to be taken into account, the appeal proceedings, do not show any use of the figurative element contained in the earlier trade marks' (para. 19). 
Međutim, dokumentima koji su podneseni tijekom postupka prigovora, čak i da su uzeti u obzir tijekom žalbenog postupka, ne bi se pokazala nikakva uporaba figurativnog elementa u ranijim žigovima” (t. 19.).
The Court confirmed that the use of a [standard] typeface does not alter the distinctive character of a word mark. 
Sud je potvrdio da uporaba [standardnog] oblika slova ne mijenja razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga.
It rather helps to distinguish the mark from the descriptive elements ‘ron' and ‘de Cuba' (para. 34). 
Umjesto toga pomoć je u razlikovanju žiga od opisnih elemenata „ron” i „de Cuba” (t. 34.).
The Board confirmed OD's views that use of the word mark ‘MILENARIO' written in stylised bold characters did not affect the distinctive character of the mark, as the word ‘MILENARIO' was considered to be the dominant element of the mark registered for sparkly wines and liquors in Class 33 (para. 13). 
Vijeće je potvrdilo mišljenje Odjela za prigovore da uporaba verbalnog žiga „MILENARIO”, pisanog stiliziranim podebljanim slovima, nije utjecala na razlikovni karakter žiga zbog toga što se smatralo da je riječ „MILENARIO” dominantni element žiga koji je registriran za pjenušava vina i likere u razredu 33. (t. 13.).
Representation of the word mark, registered for pharmaceutical and sanitary preparations; plasters; materials for dressings; fungicides; disinfectants covered by the earlier trade mark in Class 5, in a stylised form together with figurative elements was not considered as substantially changing the distinctive character of the word trade mark ‘AMYCOR' as registered. 
Smatra se da prikaz verbalnog žiga koji je registriran za farmaceutske i higijenske pripravke; flastere; materijale za previjanje; fungicide; dezinfekcijska sredstva koji su obuhvaćeni ranijim žigom iz razreda 5., pri čemu je znak prikazan u stiliziranom obliku zajedno s figurativnim elementima, ne mijenja značajno razlikovni karakter verbalnog žiga „AMYCOR” kako je registriran.
‘The applicant's argument that the proof of use is insufficient because it refers to the device mark … and not to the word mark ‘THE ECONOMIST' fails. 
„Obrazloženje podnositelja prijave da je dokaz o uporabi nedostatan zbog toga što se odnosi na logotip [...], a ne na verbalni žig ‚THE ECONOMIST', nije prihvaćen.
First, the submitted evidence refers to both earlier marks (i.e. the word mark and the device mark). 
Prvo, podneseni dokaz odnosi se na oba ranija žiga (odnosno na verbalni žig i logotip).
Furthermore, use of the earlier device mark constitutes use of the earlier word mark. 
Osim toga, uporaba ranijeg logotipa predstavlja uporabu ranijeg verbalnog žiga.
In this respect it should be noted that word marks are considered used as registered, also if the typeface is different (this may be different if the typeface is a very particular one), if there is a usual change in the letter size or a usual change between lower-case and capital letters, if used in a specific colour or if used in combination with generic additions. 
U tom pogledu treba napomenuti da se smatra da su verbalni žigovi u uporabi u obliku u kojem su registrirani, čak i ako je oblik slova drukčiji (to može biti drukčije ako se upotrebljava vrlo poseban oblik slova), ako je riječ o uobičajenoj promjeni veličine slova ili uobičajenom izmjenjivanju malih i velikih slova, ako se oni upotrebljavaju u određenoj boji ili ako se upotrebljavaju u kombinaciji s generičkim dodavanjima.
Use of the word “THE ECONOMIST” in a standard typeface, with the usual use of capitals at the beginning of the words “The” and “Economist”, in a white colour on a contrasting background is considered use, not only of the earlier device mark but of the earlier word mark as well' (para. 14). 
Uporaba riječi ‚THE ECONOMIST' u standardnom obliku slova, uz uobičajenu uporabu velikih slova na početku riječi ‚The' i ‚Economist' pisanih bijelom bojom na kontrastnoj pozadini smatra se uporabom ne samo ranijeg logotipa, već i ranijeg verbalnog žiga” (t. 14.).
BIOTEX (various) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX 
BIOTEX (razna) 02/10/2001, R 812/20001 BIO TEK (fig.) / BIOTEX
‘The mark, as shown in those documents, has been variously depicted in the following styles: - The word BIOTEX in white block capitals on a dark background in advertisements. 
„Dokaz o uporabi pokazuje da je žig, unatoč različitim stilskim promjenama, u biti ostao ,BIOTEX'.
- The word BIOTEX in white block capitals with the top-most point of the letter ‘I' in darker colouring. 
Slova sadržana u žigu općenito su velika slova koja ne sadrže ništa neobično.
- The word BIOTEX in plain block white capitals on the labels and packaging of detergent products. 
Velika su slova ponekad obična i dvodimenzionalna, a ponekad osjenčana kako bi ostavila dojam trodimenzionalnosti.
- The word BIOTEX in plain typeface on shipping invoices. 
Ponekad slovo ,i' ima drukčiju boju na vrhu.
Sometimes the letter “I” has a different colour tip. 
Registrirani oblik Stvarna uporaba Broj predmeta
This does not automatically mean that the mark was not used as registered. 
To ne znači automatski da žig nije bio u uporabi u obliku u kojemu je registriran.
Each case must be looked at on its own merits. 
Svaki slučaj treba razmotriti samostalno.
In this case, the Office finds that the mark SILVER is the actual trade mark. 
Ured u ovom slučaju utvrđuje da je žig ,SILVER' stvarni žig.
The appearance of the other word elements “Bière sans alcool”, “Bière de haute qualité”, “pur malt” and “Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg” and the figurative element is only secondary to the mark SILVER. 
Izgled ostalih verbalnih elemenata ,Bière sans alcool', ,Bière de haute qualité', ,pur malt' i ,Brassée par le Brasseries Kronenbourg' te figurativnog elementa tek je sekundaran žigu ,SILVER'.
It is also clear from the marketing study, the newspaper extract and the invoices that the actual trade mark is SILVER. 
Iz marketinške studije, novinskog isječka i računa jasno proizlazi da je stvarni žig ,SILVER'.
The Office finds that the use of the word SILVER is so dominant in the figurative mark that it fulfils the requirements of having been used as registered.' 
Ured smatra da je uporaba riječi ,SILVER' toliko dominantna u figurativnom žigu da ispunjava zahtjeve uporabe u obliku u kojem je registriran”.
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; dismissed 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Quantum, EU:C:2007:171 
12/01/2006, T147/03, Quantum, EU:T:2006:10; odbačeno 15/03/2007, C171/06 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2007:171
In any case, since the stylisation of the letter “q” suggests, as has just been said, the face of a watch, it is not particularly distinctive for goods in Class 14, the only goods for which the applicant has furnished proof of use of the earlier mark. 
U svakom slučaju, kao što je prethodno navedeno, budući da stilizirano slovo ,q' predstavlja brojčanik sata, ono nije osobito razlikovno u pogledu proizvoda iz razreda 14. - jedinih proizvoda za koje je podnositelj prijave dostavio dokaz o uporabi ranijeg žiga.
The word ‘vigar' is an invented word and is, therefore, inherently distinctive. 
Riječ „vigar” izmišljena je te stoga ima svojstven razlikovni karakter.
Given the fact that the word ‘vigar' is the only word element, and given its inherent distinctiveness, its central position and the fact that the additional elements highlight its presence, the word is the most distinctive element of the earlier mark. 
S obzirom na činjenicu da je riječ „vigar” jedini verbalni element i s obzirom na njegovu svojstvenu razlikovnost, središnji položaj i činjenicu da dodatni elementi naglašavaju njegovu prisutnost, riječ je najrazlikovniji element ranijeg žiga.
The form as used differs from the earlier mark as registered only in the ascending orientation of its oval background, the use of lower case instead of upper case letters and the replacement of the crown element by a sequence of three dots. 
Oblik žiga kako se upotrebljava razlikuje se od ranijeg žiga kako je registriran samo u uzlaznoj orijentaciji njegove ovalne pozadine, uporabi malih slova umjesto velikih slova i zamjeni elementa krune nizom od triju točaka.
The Court agreed that a different orientation of the same background, the use of upper case or lower case letters when they are standard letters that reproduce the same term, or the substitution of an ornamental element (the sequence of dots) for a laudatory element when both of those elements serve to reinforce the term ‘vigar', are minor differences that do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier trade mark as registered. 
Sud se složio da drukčija orijentacija iste pozadine, uporaba velikih i malih slova kada je riječ o standardnim slovima kojima se prikazuje isti izraz ili zamjena ukrasnog elementa (niz točaka) pohvalnim elementom kada oba ta elementa služe za pojačanje pojma „vigar”, čine manje razlike koje ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga kako je registriran.
That finding is not called into question if the second form of use is taken into account, inasmuch as, even though, in that case, the basic background disappears and the word ‘spain' is present, the latter will be understood as a merely descriptive addition (paras 70-74). 
Taj se nalaz ne dovodi u pitanje ako se u obzir uzme drugi oblik uporabe zato što će se, čak i ako u tom slučaju nestane osnovna pozadina i doda se riječ „spain”, potonje shvatiti samo kao opisni dodatak (t. 70. - 74.).
The distinctive character of the mark is essentially derived, not from its figurative elements, but from the word ‘vieta'. 
Razlikovni karakter žiga u osnovi ne proizlazi iz njegovih figurativnih elemenata, već iz riječi „vieta”.
The element has a high level of distinctive character and occupies an important position in the overall impression created by the mark as registered, whilst the figurative elements have only weak distinctive character and occupy merely an ancillary position in the overall impression. 
Taj element ima visoku razinu razlikovnog karaktera i zauzima važan položaj u ukupnom dojmu koji stvara žig kako je registriran, dok figurativni elementi imaju slab razlikovni karakter i zauzimaju samo sporedan položaj u stvaranju ukupnog dojma.
Those figurative elements, including the typeface used, have a relatively marginal visual impact. 
Ti figurativni elementi, uključujući tipografska obilježja, imaju relativno marginalan vizualni utjecaj.
The rectangular border does not present any originality in relation to usual commercial use. 
Pravokutni obrub ne predstavlja nikakvu originalnost u odnosu na uobičajenu komercijalnu uporabu.
As regards the figurative elements made up of, on the one hand, grey rectangles separating the letters of the word ‘vieta' and, on the other hand, white rectangles appearing in the middle of the sides of the rectangular border, they are very small in size, are not striking and do not present any originality (paras 47 and 48). 
Kada je riječ o figurativnim elementima sastavljenima od, s jedne strane, sivih pravokutnika koji rastavljaju slova u riječi „vieta” i, s druge strane, bijelih pravokutnika koji se pojavljuju na sredini pravokutnih obruba s lijeve i desne strane riječi, oni su vrlo maleni, nisu upečatljivi i ne predstavljaju nikakvu originalnost (t. 47. i 48.).
The two Greek flags do not possess any distinctive character in relation to the products at hand which are commonly known to be food specialities originating from Greece. 
Dvije grčke zastave ne posjeduju nikakav razlikovni karakter u odnosu na proizvode koji su dobro poznati kao specijaliteti podrijetlom iz Grčke.
This is supported by the whole get-up of the product, coloured in blue and white in accordance with the colours of the Greek flag, the depiction of scenery which calls to mind a Mediterranean scene and the symbol for a Protected Designation of Origin below the picture' (para. 39). 
To podupire cjelokupni izgled proizvoda - plava i bijela boja u skladu s bojama grčke zastave, prikaz krajolika koji podsjeća na Mediteran i simbol zaštićene oznake izvornosti ispod slike” (t. 39.).
The Court took the view that, if no colour is claimed in the application, the use of different colour combinations ‘must be allowed, as long as the letters contrast against the background.' 
Sud je smatrao da se, ako se u prijavi ne navodi nikakva boja, uporaba različitih kombinacija boja „mora dopustiti ako su slova u kontrastu s pozadinom”.
The Court also noted that the letters M, A, D were arranged in a particular way in the EUTM. 
Sud je napomenuo i da su slova M, A, D u žigu EU-a raspoređena na poseban način.
Accordingly, representations of the sign that do not alter the arrangement of the letters, or the contrast of colour, constitute genuine use (paras 41 and 45). 
U skladu s tim, prikazi znaka kojima se ne mijenja raspored slova ili kontrast boja predstavljaju stvarnu uporabu (t. 41. i 45.).
The word element was considered to be the dominant feature of the figurative mark, since it was in a central position and in large letters. 
Smatra se da je verbalni element dominantno obilježje figurativnog žiga jer se nalazi u sredini i pisan je velikim slovima.
It was considered that the distinctive character was not changed (para. 15). 
Procijenjeno je da razlikovni karakter nije izmijenjen (t. 15.).
‘The orange background is the colour of packaging of the products. 
„Narančasta pozadina predstavlja boju ambalaže proizvoda.
The mark is used in black on a white background, outlined in silver similar to the earlier registered mark. 
Za žig je upotrijebljena crna boja na bijeloj podlozi, s obrisom u srebrnoj boji, nalik ranijem registriranom žigu.
The typeface has been slightly modernised and the small hyphen between “Bi” and “Fi” has been deleted. 
Oblik slova blago je moderniziran, a spojnica između ,Bi' i ,Fi' obrisana je.
The distinctive character of the earlier mark is still based on the large black letters “Bi Fi”, the “B” and “F” being in capital letters and the two “i” letters in lower case, on a white background and outlined in silver' (para. 45). 
Razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga i dalje se temelji na velikim crnim slovima ,Bi Fi', pri čemu su slova ,B' i ,F' pisana velikim slovima, a dva slova ,i' malim slovima, na bijeloj pozadini i s obrisom u srebrnoj boji” (t. 45.).
(with word mark John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (AG case) 
(s verbalnim žigom John Deere) 28/10/2009, T137/08, Green/Yellow, EU:T:2009:417 (predmet AG)
‘The colours covered by the application for registration were designated using the Munsell system as: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (green) and 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (yellow). 
„Boje obuhvaćene prijavom za registraciju navedene su uporabom Munsellovog sustava boja: 9.47 GY3.57/7.45 (zelena) i 5.06 Y7.63/10.66 (žuta).
The arrangement is described as being ‘green for the vehicle body and yellow for the wheels', as is shown by a picture attached to the application and reproduced below ' (para. 3). 
Raspored je opisan na sljedeći način: ,zelena za karoseriju vozila i žuta za kotače‚, kako je prikazano na slici priloženoj uz prijavu i reproduciranoj u nastavku ” (t. 3.).
‘[A]lthough it is true that the disputed mark was used and promoted in conjunction with the word mark John Deere [underlining added] and that the intervener's advertising expenditure in the European Union was presented as a whole and not individually for each country, the applicant is wrong to claim that it was not proved to the required legal standard that the intervener had used the combination of the colours green and yellow on its goods as a trade mark and that the market penetration of its goods had been deep and long-lasting in all the Member States of the European Union as at 1 April 1996' (para. 46). 
„[I]ako je istina da je osporavani žig bio u uporabi i promoviran zajedno s verbalnim žigom John Deere [isticanje naknadno dodano] i da je posrednikov trošak za oglašavanje u Europskoj uniji prikazan kao cjelina, a ne pojedinačno za svaku zemlju, podnositelj prijave je u krivu kada tvrdi da nije u dovoljnoj mjeri dokazano da je posrednik upotrebljavao kombinaciju zelene i žute boje kao žig na svojim proizvodima i da je prodor njegovih proizvoda na tržište bio intenzivan i dugotrajan u svim državama članicama Europske unije 1. travnja 1996.” (t. 46.).
In this case the use of the mark with a different spelling and the addition of the letter ‘C' alter the distinctive character of the registered sign, because the letters ‘VIT' are now seen as a descriptive element, namely ‘VIT C' (which refers to ‘Vitamin C'). 
U tom slučaju uporaba žiga uz izmijenjeni način pisanja i dodavanje slova „C” mijenja razlikovni karakter registriranog znaka zbog toga što se sada slova „VIT” percipiraju kao opisni element, odnosno „VIT C” (koji se odnosi na „Vitamin C”).
‘[T]he ‘NOVEDADES' catalogues dated 2004-2009 consistently show the mark and only this version. 
„[K]atalozi ,NOVEDADES' s datumom iz 2004. - 2009. dosljedno prikazuju žig i to samo ovu inačicu.
This does not constitute use of the mark [as registered] (with or without colour) as admissible under Article 15(1)(a) CTMR [now Article 18(1)(a) EUTMR]. 
To se ne smatra uporabom znaka [u obliku u kojemu je registriran] (sa ili bez boje) kako je dopuštena na temelju članka 15. stavka 1. točke (a) Uredbe o žigu Zajednice [koji je postao članak 18. stavak 1. točka (a) Uredbe o žigu EU-a].
The mere fact that both marks include a word element LLOYD'S is not enough for that purpose, also the figurative elements of the earlier mark must appear in the form as used. 
Sama činjenica da oba žiga uključuju verbalni element ,LLOYD'S' nije dostatna u tu svrhu, a i figurativni elementi ranijeg žiga moraju se pojaviti u obliku u kojem se upotrebljavaju.
The form as used is in a different font, lacks the single letter L at the end and surrounded by an orbital device, and lacks the circular or orbital device around the word ‘LLOYD'S'. 
Oblik koji je u uporabi ima drukčiju vrstu slova, nedostaje mu samostalno slovo ,L' na kraju i okružuje ga element koji nalikuje orbiti, a nedostaje mu kružni ili orbitalni element oko riječi ,LLOYD'S'.
In other words, all its figurative elements are missing in the form as used. 
Drugim riječima, nedostaju svi figurativni elementi u obliku koji je u uporabi.
On top, the form as used contains the conspicuous device of a flying bird with a long beak. 
Oblik u uporabi na vrhu ima upadljivi element ptice u letu s dugim kljunom.
The omission of all the figurative elements of the mark as registered and the addition of another figurative element does alter, in the form as used, the distinctive character of the mark and is much more than a mere variation or modernisation' (para. 35). 
Izostavljanje svih figurativnih elemenata žiga kako je registriran i dodavanje drugog figurativnog elementa u obliku koji je u uporabi mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga i on predstavlja više od same varijante ili modernijeg izričaja” (t. 35.).