natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In inter partes proceedings, unless submitted by electronic means, any supporting documents, including annexes or other evidence must be submitted in two copies (for further information see the Guidelines, Part A, General Rules, Section 1, Means of Communication, Time Limits). 
U postupku inter partes, sve popratne dokumente, osim onih koji se podnose elektroničkim putem, uključujući sve priloge ili druge dokaze, treba podnijeti u dva primjerka (dodatne informacije potražite u Smjernicama, dio A, Opća pravila, odjeljak 1., Komunikacijska sredstva, rokovi).
The written evidence will be communicated to the other party as soon as possible, and the Office may set the other party a time limit of, in principle, 2 months to reply. 
O dokaznom materijalu u pisanom obliku obavješćuje se druga stranka što je ranije moguće, a Ured može drugoj stranci odrediti rok od načelno dva mjeseca u kojem treba odgovoriti.
A deficiency will be raised during the proceedings stage (i) when the evidence is not structured in numbered annexes; (ii) when no index is sent (that is to say, when the required content of the index is not identifiable in any form); or (iii) when, on its own motion or after being questioned by the other party, the Office finds it justified, in particular when it considers that the failure to comply with the relevant requirements significantly impairs the Office's or the other party's ability to review and assess the documents or items of evidence submitted and to understand the relevance of the same. 
Na nedostatak se ukazuje u fazi postupka, i. ako dokazi nisu navedeni u numeriranim prilozima; ii. ako nije poslano kazalo (odnosno, ako se ni u kojem obliku ne može utvrditi traženi sadržaj kazala); ili iii. ako Ured na vlastitu inicijativu ili nakon što to zatraži stranka smatra to opravdanim, osobito ako smatra da neispunjavanje relevantnih zahtjeva znatno narušava sposobnost Ureda ili druge stranke da pregleda i procijeni podnesene dokumente ili dokazne materijale te da razumije njihovu relevantnost.
Any such deficiency may be overcome by structuring the evidence in numbered annexes, or submitting an index identifying the content of the annexes, as applicable. 
Takav se nedostatak može izbjeći ako se dokazi navedu u numeriranim prilozima ili ako se podnese kazalo u kojem se utvrđuje sadržaj prilogâ, ako je primjenjivo.
Where the deficiency is not remedied within the period specified by the Office, and where it is still not possible for the Office to clearly establish to which ground or argument a document or item of evidence refers, that document or item will not be taken into account. 
Ako se nedostatak ne ukloni u roku koji određuje Ured te ako Ured i dalje ne može jasno utvrditi na koji se razlog ili argument dokument ili dokazni materijal odnosi, taj dokument ili materijal ne uzimaju se u obzir.
No such specific provisions as to the format of document or items of evidence exist for RCD proceedings. 
U postupcima povezanima s dizajnom Zajednice ne postoje takve posebne odredbe u pogledu formata dokumenta ili dokaznih materijala.
Therefore, documents or items of evidence submitted by one party will be communicated to the other parties as soon as possible, and the Office may set the other parties a time limit of, in principle, 2 months to reply. 
O svim dokumentima ili dokaznom materijalu koje podnosi jedna stranka ostale stranke obavijestit će se što je ranije moguće, a Ured može ostalim strankama odrediti rok od načelno dva mjeseca u kojem trebaju odgovoriti.
For further information on oral proceedings, see paragraph 5 below. 
Dodatne informacije o usmenom postupku potražite u odlomku 5. navedenom u nastavku.
4.2 Oral evidence and inspections 
Usmeni dokazi i uvidi
This refers to evidence taken in oral proceedings, such as hearing the oral evidence of parties, witnesses or experts, or carrying out inspections. 
To se odnosi na dokaze izvedene u usmenim postupcima, kao što su saslušanje dokaza stranaka, svjedoka ili vještaka, odnosno provođenje uvida.
Only in exceptional cases will the Office decide to hear oral evidence, in particular because of the cumbersome nature of the procedure, which is liable to protract the proceedings, and because of the cost, which will have to be borne by the unsuccessful party in inter partes proceedings or, in some cases, by both parties. 
Ured samo u iznimnim predmetima odlučuje saslušati dokaze u usmenom obliku, osobito zbog složene prirode postupka zbog koje se postupak može oduljiti i zbog troškova koje naposljetku mora snositi stranka koja nije bila uspješna u postupku inter partes, ili, u pojedinim slučajevima, obje stranke.
If the Office invites one of the parties to give evidence orally, it will advise the other parties accordingly so that they can attend. 
Ako Ured pozove jednu od stranaka da iznese dokaz u usmenom obliku, o tome obavješćuje ostale stranke koje u tom slučaju tome mogu prisustvovati.
Similarly, when the Office summons an expert or a witness to a hearing, it will advise the parties concerned. 
Nadalje, ako Ured na raspravu pozove određenog stručnjaka ili svjedoka, o tome obavješćuje dotične stranke.
These may be present and put questions to the person giving evidence. 
One mogu prisustvovati raspravi i postavljati pitanja osobi koja izvodi dokaze.
4.3 Specific means of evidence 
Posebni dokazni materijal
4.3.1 Commissioning of experts by the Office 
Vještaci koje angažira Ured
Opinions by experts will be used only as a last resort because they involve substantial costs and protract the proceedings. 
Mišljenje vještaka upotrebljava se samo kao krajnje rješenje jer zbog toga nastaju znatni troškovi i produljuje se postupak.
It is up to the Office to decide whether or not to commission an expert's opinion, who to appoint as expert and what form the opinion should take. 
Ured odlučuje hoće li zatražiti mišljenje vještaka, koga imenovati za vještaka i kakvog oblika treba biti mišljenje.
However, the Office does not maintain a list of experts because it uses experts as a means of taking evidence only by way of exception. 
Međutim, Ured nema popis vještaka jer ih za izvođenje dokaza upotrebljava isključivo u iznimnim slučajevima.
The terms of reference of the expert include: 
Okviri u kojima vještak radi uključuju:
a precise description of their task; 
točan opis njihova zadatka;
the deadline for submitting their opinion; 
rok za podnošenje mišljenja;
the names of the parties to the proceedings; 
imena stranaka u postupku;
details of any costs to be reimbursed by the Office. 
pojedinosti o troškovima koje treba nadoknaditi Ured.
The expert opinion must be submitted in the language of the proceedings or accompanied by a translation into that language. 
Mišljenje vještaka mora se podnijeti na jeziku postupka ili uz njega mora biti priložen prijevod na taj jezik.
A copy of any written opinion, and of the translation if needed, must be submitted to the parties. 
Primjerak svakog mišljenja u pisanom obliku i, ako je potrebno, prijevoda treba dostaviti strankama.
If the Office considers the report sufficient, and if the parties accept this form of report, it will in principle be used only in its written form. 
Ako Ured izvješće smatra dostatnim i ako stranke prihvate taj oblik izvješća, ono će se načelno upotrebljavati samo u pisanom obliku.
The submission of an oral report or the hearing of oral evidence given by the expert will therefore be at the Office's discretion. 
Predaja usmenih izvješća ili saslušanja usmenih dokaza koje iznosi vještak stoga je mogućnost koja ovisi o prosudbi Ureda.
The parties can object to an expert on the grounds of incompetence or a conflict of interest, or because the expert was previously involved in the dispute or is suspected of partiality. 
Stranke mogu istaknuti prigovor u pogledu vještaka na temelju nenadležnosti ili sukoba interesa, zato što je vještak prethodno bio uključen u spor ili ga se sumnjiči na pristranost.
No refusal may be based on the appointed expert's nationality. 
Odbijanje se ne smije temeljiti na nacionalnosti imenovanog vještaka.
If a party objects to the expert, the Office will rule on the objection. 
Ako stranke istaknu prigovor u pogledu vještaka, Ured odlučuje o prihvaćanju ili odbijanju prigovora.
4.3.2 Affidavits 
Uredbe o provedbi Uredbe o dizajnu Zajednice.
In order for a statement to be considered sworn or affirmed, it must be understood by the parties that making a false statement would be considered a criminal offence under the law of the Member State in which the document was drawn up. 
Kako bi se izjava smatrala pisanom pod prisegom ili svečanom, stranke moraju razumjeti da se davanje lažnih izjava smatra kaznenim djelom na temelju prava države članice u kojoj je dokument sastavljen.
Where that is not the case, the document will be considered simply as any other written document or statement (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 32 and the case-law cited therein). 
Ako to nije slučaj, dokument se razmatra kao svaki drugi pisani dokument ili izjava (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 32 and the case-law cited therein).
The evidential value of an affidavit is relative (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 33). 
Dokazna je vrijednost izjave pod prisegom relativna (28/03/2012, T214/08, Outburst, EU:T:2012:161, § 33).
In assessing the evidential value of such a document, the Office will consider first and foremost the credibility of the account it contains. 
U ocjeni dokazne vrijednosti dokumenta Ured najprije razmatra vjerodostojnost njegova sadržaja.
It will then take account, in particular, of the person who produced the document, the circumstances in which it came about, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, on the face of it, the document appears sound and reliable (07/06/2005, T303/03, Salvita, EU:T:2005:200, § 42 and the case-law cited therein; 18/11/2015, T813/14, Cases for portable computers, EU:T:2015:868, § 26). 
Zatim konkretno uzima u obzir osobu koja je dostavila dokument, okolnosti u kojima ga je ta osoba pribavila, osobu kojoj je upućen i čini li se dokument valjanim i pouzdanim na prvi pogled (07/06/2005, T303/03, Salvita, EU:T:2005:200, § 42 i navedena sudska praksa; 18/11/2015, T813/14, Cases for portable computers, EU:T:2015:868, § 26).
Affidavits containing detailed and concrete information and/or that are supported by other evidence have a higher probative value than very general and abstractly drafted statements. 
Izjave pod prisegom koje sadržavaju podrobne i konkretne informacije ili informacije koje su potkrijepljene drugim dokazima mogu imati veću dokaznu vrijednost od općih i apstraktnih izjava.
The mere fact that affidavits from third parties are made according to a predetermined draft provided by the interested party (parties) does not in itself affect their reliability and credibility, and does not call into question their probative value since the veracity of their contents is certified by the signatory (16/09/2013, T200/10, Avery Dennison, EU:T:2013:467, § 73). 
Sama činjenica da se izjave pod prisegom trećih strana sastavljaju prema unaprijed određenom obrascu koji daje zainteresirana stranka (stranke) ne utječe na njihovu pouzdanost i vjerodostojnost te se njome ne dovodi u pitanje njihova dokazna vrijednost s obzirom na to da je njihov sadržaj potvrdila osoba koja ju je potpisala (16/09/2013, T200/10, Avery Dennison, EU:T:2013:467, § 73).
4.3.3 Inspections 
Uvidi
Only in very exceptional circumstances will the Office carry out an inspection in situ. 
Samo u krajnje iznimnim okolnostima Ured provodi uvid in situ.
5 Oral Proceedings 
Članci 49. do 55.
Articles 96 to 97 EUTMR 
Delegirane uredbe o žigu EU-a
Articles 49 to 55 EUTMDR 
Članci 64. i 65.
Articles 64 to 65 CDR 
Uredbe o dizajnu Zajednice
Articles 42 to 46 and 82 CDIR 
Članci 42. do 46. i članak 82.
In the vast majority of cases it will be sufficient for the parties to present their observations in writing. 
U većini je slučajeva dovoljno da stranke podnesu svoja očitovanja u pisanom obliku.
5.1 Summons to oral proceedings 
Pozivanje na usmeni postupak
Where the Office has decided to hold oral proceedings and to summon the parties, the period of notice may not be less than one month unless the parties agree to a shorter period. 
Ako je Ured odlučio provesti usmeni postupak i uputiti poziv strankama, rok za obavijest ne smije biti kraći od mjesec dana osim ako stranke dogovore kraći rok.
Since the purpose of any oral proceedings is to clarify all outstanding points before the final decision is taken, the Office, in its summons, should draw the parties' attention to the points that need to be discussed in order for the decision to be taken. 
Budući da je svrha svakog usmenog postupka razjasniti sva preostala pitanja koja treba riješiti prije donošenja konačne odluke, Ured u svojim pozivima treba skrenuti pozornost stranaka na točke o kojima treba raspraviti kako bi se donijela odluka.
Where the Office considers it necessary to hear oral evidence from the parties, witnesses or experts, it will take an interim decision stating the means by which it intends to obtain evidence, the relevant facts to be proven and the date, time and place of the hearing. 
Ako Ured smatra da je potrebno saslušati dokaze stranaka, svjedoka ili vještaka u usmenom obliku, donosi privremenu odluku u kojoj navodi na koji način namjerava pribaviti dokaze, relevantne činjenice koje treba dokazati te datum, vrijeme i mjesto rasprave.
The period of notice will be at least one month, unless the parties concerned agree to a shorter period. 
Rok za obavijest iznosi najmanje mjesec dana, osim ako dotične stranke ne dogovore kraći rok.
The summons will provide a summary of this decision and state the names of the parties to the proceedings and details of the costs, if any, that the witnesses or experts may be entitled to have reimbursed by the Office. 
U pozivu se navodi sažetak odluke i imena stranaka u postupku te pojedinosti o troškovima, ako postoje, za koje svjedoci i vještaci mogu imati pravo na naknadu koju isplaćuje Ured.
The Office may also offer the possibility of taking part in the oral proceedings by video conference or other technical means. 
Ured može ponuditi i mogućnost sudjelovanja u usmenom postupku putem videokonferencije ili drugim tehničkim sredstvima.
If required, and in order to facilitate the hearing, the Office may invite the parties to submit written observations or to submit evidence prior to the oral hearing. 
Ako je potrebno i kako bi se olakšala rasprava, Ured može pozvati stranke da podnesu pisana očitovanja ili predoče dokaze prije rasprave.
The period fixed by the Office for receiving these observations must allow sufficient time for them to reach the Office and then be forwarded to the other parties. 
U roku koji određuje Ured za primanje tih očitovanja mora biti dovoljno vremena kako bi ona stigla do Ureda te da bi ih se zatim proslijedilo drugim strankama.
The parties may likewise submit evidence in support of their arguments on their own initiative. 
Stranke također mogu na vlastitu inicijativu podnijeti dokaze kojima potkrepljuju svoje argumente.
However, if this evidence ought to have been produced at an earlier stage of the proceedings, the Office will decide whether these items of evidence are admissible, taking account of the principle of hearing both parties, where appropriate. 
Međutim, ako su ti dokazi trebali biti podneseni u ranijoj fazi postupka, Ured odlučuje jesu li oni dopušteni, uzimajući u obzir načelo saslušanja obiju stranaka ako je potrebno.
5.2 Language of oral proceedings 
Jezik usmenog postupka
Oral proceedings will be in the language of the proceedings unless the parties agree to use a different official EU language. 
Usmeni postupak vodi se na jeziku postupka osim ako stranke dogovore da će upotrebljavati neki drugi službeni jezik EU-a.
The Office may communicate in oral proceedings in another official EU language and it may, upon prior written request, authorise a party to communicate in another official EU language provided that simultaneous interpretation of the communication into the language of proceedings can be made available. 
Ured u usmenom postupku može komunicirati na drugom službenom jeziku EU-a te može, uz prethodni pisani zahtjev, dopustiti stranci da komunicira na drugom službenom jeziku EU-a pod uvjetom da je dostupna mogućnost simultanog prevođenja na jezik postupka.
The costs of providing simultaneous interpretation will be paid by the party making the request or by the Office as the case may be. 
Troškove simultanog prevođenja plaća stranka koja podnosi zahtjev ili Ured, ovisno o slučaju.
5.3 Course of the oral proceedings 
Tijek usmenog postupka
Oral proceedings before the examiners, the Opposition Division and the department in charge of the Register will not be public. 
Usmeni postupak pred ispitivačima, Odjelom za prigovore i odjelom kojemu je povjereno održavanje registra nije javan.
Oral proceedings, including the delivery of the decision, will be public before the Cancellation/Invalidity Division and the Boards of Appeal, insofar as the department before which the proceedings are taking place does not decide otherwise in cases where admission of the public could have serious and unjustified disadvantages, in particular for a party to the proceedings. 
Usmeni postupak, uključujući donošenje odluke, vodi se javno pred odjelom za brisanje / proglašenje ništavosti i žalbenim odborom, osim ako odjel pred kojim se vodi postupak odluči drukčije u slučajevima u kojima bi prisutnost javnosti mogla biti uzrokom ozbiljnih i nepravednih okolnosti, osobito stranci u postupku.
If a party who has been duly summoned to oral proceedings does not appear before the Office, the proceedings may continue without them. 
Ako se stranka kojoj je propisno upućen poziv na usmeni postupak ne pojavi u Uredu, postupak se može nastaviti bez nje.
If the Office invites a party to give evidence orally, it will advise the other parties accordingly so that they can attend. 
Ako Ured pozove jednu od stranaka da iznese dokaz u usmenom obliku, o tome obavješćuje ostale stranke koje u tom slučaju tome mogu prisustvovati.
At the end of the oral proceedings the Office will allow the parties to present their final pleadings. 
Na kraju usmenog postupka Ured treba omogućiti strankama da iznesu svoje završne riječi.
Article 53 EUTMDR 
Delegirane uredbe o žigu EU-a
Article 46 CDIR 
Članak 46.
In particular, they will not contain the verbatim statements made nor be submitted for approval. 
Točnije, ne sadržava doslovno podnesene izjave niti se predaje na odobrenje.
However, any statements by experts or witnesses will be recorded so that at further instances the exact statements made can be verified. 
Međutim, sve izjave vještaka ili svjedoka bilježe se kako bi se točne podnesene izjave kasnije mogle provjeriti.
Where oral proceedings or the taking of evidence before the Office are recorded, the recording will replace the minutes. 
Ako se usmeni postupak ili izvođenje dokaza u Uredu snima, ta snimka zamjenjuje zapisnik.
The parties will receive a copy of the minutes. 
Stranke dobivaju primjerak zapisnika.
5.5 Costs of taking evidence in oral proceedings 
Troškovi izvođenja dokaza u usmenom postupku
The Office may make the taking of evidence conditional upon a deposit by the party requesting it. 
Ured uvjetuje izvođenje dokaza uplatom stranke koja ga je zatražila.
The amount will be fixed by the Office based on an estimate of the costs. 
Iznos određuje Ured na temelju procjene troškova.
The witnesses and experts summoned or heard by the Office will be entitled to reimbursement of expenses for travel and subsistence, including an advance. 
Svjedoci i vještaci kojima je Ured uputio poziv ili ih je saslušao imaju pravo na naknadu putnih i boravišnih troškova, uključujući predujam.
They will also be entitled to compensation for loss of earnings and payment for their work. 
Imaju pravo i na naknadu izgubljene zarade te isplatu za svoj rad.
Where the Office decides to adopt means of taking evidence that require oral evidence from witnesses or experts, the Office will bear the cost of this. 
Ako Ured odluči primijeniti načine izvođenja dokaza kojima se od svjedoka i vještaka traži usmeni dokaz, Ured snosi povezane troškove.
6.1 Contents 
Uredbe o žigu EU-a
Article 94 EUTMR 
Članak 62.
Article 62 CDR 
Uredbe o dizajnu Zajednice
Articles 38 to 41 CDIR 
Članci 38. do 41.
The decision will cover the relevant points raised by the parties. 
Odluka obuhvaća relevantna pitanja koja su istaknule stranke.
In particular, if there are different outcomes for some goods and services of the EUTM application or registration concerned, the decision will make clear which of the goods and services are refused and which are not. 
Konkretno, ako postoje različiti ishodi za određene proizvode i usluge u okviru predmetne prijave ili registracije žiga EU-a, iz odluke će biti jasno koji su proizvodi i usluge odbijeni, a koji nisu.
Article 33 EUTMDR 
Uredbe o dizajnu Zajednice
Article 70 CDR 
Članci 37. i 79.
Articles 37 and 79 CDIR 
Uredbe o provedbi Uredbe o dizajnu Zajednice
It does not involve the relationship with the Office (fees paid, the Office's internal costs). 
Ured ne nadoknađuje nikakve plaćene pristojbe (iznimke su članak 33.
In ex parte proceedings, there is no decision on costs, nor any apportionment of costs. 
Delegirane uredbe o žigu EU-a i članak 37.
Decisions on costs, or the fixing of costs, are limited to opposition, cancellation and design invalidity proceedings (including the ensuing appeal proceedings or proceedings before the GC and CJEU). 
Odluke o troškovima ili utvrđivanje troškova donose se samo u postupcima prigovora, brisanja i proglašenja ništavosti (uključujući žalbene postupke koji slijede, postupke pred Općim sudom ili Sudom EU-a).
If a decision is given in inter partes proceedings, the Office will also decide on the apportionment of costs. 
Stoga, ako je odluka donesena u postupku inter partes, Ured odlučuje o raspodjeli troškova.
The decision will fix the costs to be paid by the losing party/parties. 
Odlukom se utvrđuju troškovi koje trebaju platiti stranke koje su izgubile spor.
The losing party will bear the fees and costs incurred by the other party that are essential to the proceedings. 
Stranka koja je izgubila spor snosi pristojbe i troškove nastale drugoj stranci koji su ključni za postupak.
No proof that these costs were actually incurred is required. 
Nije potreban dokaz da su ti troškovi zaista nastali.
If both parties fail on one or more heads or if reasons of equity so dictate, the Office may determine a different apportionment of costs. 
Ako su obje stranke neuspješne u jednom ili više zahtjeva ili do te mjere da to zahtijeva pravičnost, Ured može odrediti drukčiju raspodjelu troškova.
If the contested EUTM application, EUTM or RCD is withdrawn or surrendered, or the opposition, request for cancellation or application for a declaration of invalidity is withdrawn, the Office will not decide on the substance of the case, although it will normally take a decision on costs. 
Ako se osporavana prijava žiga EU-a, žig EU-a ili dizajn Zajednice povuče ili ga se nositelj odrekne, odnosno ako se odustane od zahtjeva za brisanje ili za proglašenje ništavosti, Ured ne odlučuje o meritumu predmeta iako obično donosi odluku o troškovima.
The party terminating the proceedings will bear the fees and costs incurred by the other party. 
Stranka koja prekida postupak snosi pristojbe i troškove koji su nastali drugoj stranci.
Where the case is closed for other reasons, the Office will fix the costs at its discretion. 
Ako se predmet zaključi iz drugih razloga, Ured utvrđuje troškove prema vlastitoj prosudbi.
This part of the decision can be enforced in simplified proceedings in all Member States of the EU once it becomes final. 
Ovaj se dio odluke može izvršiti u pojednostavnjenom postupku u svim državama članicama EU-a nakon što postane konačna.
In no case will the decision on costs be based on hypothetical assumptions about who might have won the proceedings if a decision on substance had been taken. 
Odluka o troškovima ni u jednom se predmetu neće temeljiti na pretpostavkama o tome tko je mogao pobijediti u postupku da je donesena odluka o meritumu.