natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G-STAR and 21/01/2010, T309/08, EU:T:2010:22 
G-STAR i 21/01/2010, T309/08, EU:T:2010:22
Visually the signs give a different overall impression, due to the figurative element of a Chinese dragon's head placed at the beginning of the mark applied for. 
Vizualno znakovi ostavljaju različiti ukupni dojam zbog figurativnog elementa glave kineskog zmaja na početku žiga za koji je podnesena prijava.
Aurally, there is a rather close aural similarity between the marks at issue. 
Postoji prilično bliska zvučna sličnost između predmetnih žigova.
The signs are conceptually different, since the element ‘star' of the earlier marks is a word that is part of basic English vocabulary, the meaning of which is widely understood throughout the EU. 
Znakovi su konceptualno različiti jer je element „star” (zvijezda) ranijeg žiga riječ koja je dio osnovnog engleskog rječnika, a čije je značenje razumljivo diljem EU-a.
Therefore, the earlier marks will be perceived as referring to a star or a famous person. 
Stoga će se raniji žigovi shvatiti kao da se odnose na zvijezdu ili poznatu osobu.
It is possible that a part of the relevant public will attribute to the element ‘stor' of the contested mark the sense of the Danish and Swedish word ‘stor', meaning ‘big, large', or will regard it as a reference to the English word ‘store' meaning ‘shop, storage'. 
Moguće je da će dio relevantne javnosti elementu „stor” osporavanog žiga pripisati značenje danske i švedske riječi „stor”, što znači „velik, širok”, ili će je smatrati upućivanjem na englesku riječ „store” u značenju „trgovina, spremište”.
It is, however, more likely that the majority of the relevant public will not attribute any particular meaning to that element. 
Ipak, vjerojatnije je da većina relevantne javnosti tom elementu neće pripisati nikakvo posebno značenje.
Therefore, the relevant public will perceive the marks at issue as conceptually different inasmuch as the earlier marks have a clear meaning throughout the EU, while the mark applied for has either a different meaning for part of the relevant public or no meaning. 
Stoga će relevantna javnost predmetne žigove pojmiti kao konceptualno različite s obzirom na to da raniji žigovi imaju jasno značenje diljem EU-a, dok žig za koji je podnesena prijava ima ili različito značenje za dio relevantne javnosti ili uopće nema značenje.
According to settled case-law, where the meaning of at least one of the two signs at issue is clear and specific so that it can be grasped immediately by the relevant public, the conceptual differences between those signs may counteract the visual and aural similarities between them. 
U skladu s utvrđenom sudskom praksom, ako je značenje barem jednog od dvaju predmetnih znakova jasno i specifično tako da ga relevantna javnost može odmah pojmiti, konceptualne razlike između tih znakova mogu ublažiti njihove vizualne i zvučne sličnosti.
The Board of Appeal was right to find that the visual and conceptual differences between the marks prevented any assumption of a possible link between them (paras 25 to 36). 
Žalbeno vijeće bilo je u pravu kada je zaključilo da vizualne i konceptualne razlike između žigova onemogućuju bilo kakvu pretpostavku o mogućoj vezi između njih (t. 25. - 36.).
ONLY 07/10/2010, R 1556/20092 (confirmed 08/12/2011, T586/10, EU:T:2011:722) 
ONLY 07/10/2010, R 1556/20092 (potvrđeno 08/12/2011, T586/10, EU:T:2011:722)
The goods in Class 3 are identical and target the same public. 
Proizvodi iz razreda 3. istovjetni su i namijenjeni istoj javnosti.
There is a slight degree of visual and conceptual similarity between the signs at issue and a moderate degree of aural similarity. 
Postoji mala razina vizualne i konceptualne sličnosti između predmetnih znakova i umjerena razina zvučne sličnosti.
Even if the earlier marks had a reputation, the differences between the signs, in particular due to the conceptual unit created by the combination of the element ‘only' and the distinctive dominant element ‘givenchy', would be significant enough for the public not to make any connection between them. 
Čak i ako su raniji žigovi imali ugled, razlike između znakova, posebno zbog konceptualne jedinice stvorene kombinacijom elementa „only” i razlikovnog dominantnog elementa „givenchy”, bile bi dovoljne da ih javnost ne poveže.
KARUNA 29/06/2010, R 696/20094, (confirmed 20/06/2012, T357/10, EU:T:2012:312) 
KARUNA 29/06/2010, R 696/20094, (potvrđeno 20/06/2012, T357/10, EU:T:2012:312)
The goods concerned, chocolate in Class 30, are identical. 
Predmetni proizvodi, čokolada iz razreda 30., istovjetni su.
The signs differ visually not only because of the figurative elements in the sign applied for, but also because of their verbal elements. 
Znakovi se vizualno razlikuju ne samo zbog figurativnih elemenata znaka za koji je podnesena prijava, već i zbog njihovih verbalnih elemenata.
Even though the verbal elements of the marks at issue have three letters out of six in common, a difference arises because the earlier marks begin with the letters ‘ka' while the mark applied for begins with the letters ‘co', and because the consumer normally attaches more importance to the first part of words. 
Iako verbalni elementi predmetnih žigova imaju tri od šest zajedničkih slova, razlika nastaje jer raniji žig počinje slovima „ka”, dok žig za koji je podnesena prijava počinje slovima „co”, te zbog toga što potrošači inače više pozornosti obraćaju na prvi dio riječi.
There is a low degree of phonetic similarity between the signs taken as a whole. 
Između znakova, gledanih u cjelini, postoji niska razina fonetske sličnosti.
Conceptually, the word ‘corona', meaning ‘crown' in Spanish, does not have any meaning in Estonian, Latvian or Lithuanian. 
Konceptualno riječ „corona”, koja na španjolskom jeziku znači „kruna”, nema nikakvo značenje na estonskom, latvijskom ili litavskom jeziku.
Accordingly, no conceptual comparison is possible between the signs at issue in the three Baltic States. 
U skladu s time, nije moguće konceptualno usporediti predmetne znakove u tim trima baltičkim državama.
The mere fact that the Lithuanian word ‘karūna' means ‘crown' is not sufficient to establish that the relevant public associates the terms ‘karuna' or ‘karūna' with the word ‘corona', which remains a foreign word. 
Sama činjenica da litavska riječ „karūna” znači „kruna” nije dovoljna kako bi se utvrdilo da relevantna javnost pojam „karuna” ili „karūna” povezuje s riječju „corona” koja je i dalje strana riječ.
Repute for services in Classes 38, 42 and 45, inter alia, a website for social networking Classes 14, 18 and 25 
Ugled za usluge iz razreda 38., 42. i 45., među ostalim, mrežno mjesto za društveno umrežavanje Razredi 14., 18. i 25.
The Board defined the relevant public as the average European consumer of the goods applied for, which are ordinary goods meant for the general public. 
Vijeće je definiralo relevantnu javnost kao prosječnog europskog potrošača proizvoda za koji je podnesena prijava, a koji je običan proizvod namijenjen široj javnosti.
The Board found it likely that the applicant's goods could be seen as merchandising products coming from the opponent. 
Vijeće je utvrdilo vjerojatnost da se proizvodi podnositelja prijave mogu pojmiti kao trgovačka roba podnositelja prigovora.
Items such as t-shirts, key chains, watches, hand bags, jewellery, caps, etc., are very frequently used as marketing means bearing trade marks that relate to entirely distinct goods and services. 
Predmeti kao što su majice, privjesci za ključeve, ručni satovi, ručne torbe, nakit, kape itd. često se upotrebljavaju kao marketinška sredstva sa žigovima koji se odnose na potpuno različite proizvode i usluge.
Upon encountering the sign TWITTER used on a watch, a scarf or a t-shirt, the relevant consumer would inevitably make a mental connection with the opponent's sign and the services it offers, on account of the reputation of the opponent's mark. 
Nakon susretanja sa znakom TWITTER na ručnom satu, šalu ili majici, relevantni će ga potrošač nezaobilazno povezati sa znakom i uslugama podnositelja prigovora zbog ugleda njegova žiga.
This would give the applicant a competitive advantage since its goods would benefit from the extra attractiveness they would gain from the association with the opponent's older mark. 
Time bi se podnositelju prijave osigurala konkurentna prednost jer bi njegovi proizvodi imali koristi od privlačnosti koja proizlazi iz asocijacije s ranijim znakom podnositelja prigovora.
Buying a TWITTER watch as a present for someone who is known to be a TWITTER user is, for example, an action motivated by the fondness for the earlier mark (para. 40). 
Primjerice, kupnja ručnog sata TWITTER kao dara osobi za koju se zna da je korisnica društvene mreže TWITTER djelo je motivirano naklonjenošću ranijem žigu (t. 40.).
Terms in Article 8(5) EUTMR Commonly used equivalents 
Pojmovi iz članka 8. stavka 5.
Unfair advantage Free-riding, riding on the coat-tails 
Uredbe o žigu EU-a Najčešći ekvivalenti
Detriment to distinctiveness Dilution by blurring, dilution, blurring, watering down, debilitating, whittling away 
Nepošteno iskorištavanje Provlačenje, ubacivanje u područje djelovanja
Detriment to repute Dilution by tarnishing, tarnishment, degradation 
Šteta razlikovnosti Razblaživanje zamagljivanjem, razblaživanje, zamagljivanje, razvodnjavanje, oslabljivanje, slabljenje
Earlier reputed sign EUTM application Case No 
Šteta ugledu Razblaživanje okaljanjem, okaljanje, degradacija
Spa Les Thermes de Spa Spa-Finders 25/05/2005, T67/04 
Raniji znak s ugledom Prijava za žig EU-a Broj predmeta
The unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark consists in the fact that the image of the mark with a reputation or the characteristics that it projects will be transferred to the goods covered by the mark applied for, with the result that the marketing of those goods can be made easier by the association with the earlier mark with a reputation (para. 48). 
Nepošteno iskorištavanje razlikovnog karaktera ili ugleda ranijeg žiga sastoji se u tome da će imidž žiga s ugledom ili obilježja koja se njime projiciraju biti prenesena na proizvode obuhvaćene žigom za koji je podnesena prijava, čime se olakšava oglašavanje tih proizvoda zbog njihove asocijacije s ranijim žigom s ugledom (t. 48.).
In her opinion in the Intel preliminary ruling, Advocate General Sharpston referred to unfair advantage as follows: ‘The concepts of taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the mark in contrast must be intended to encompass “instances where there is clear exploitation and free-riding on the coattails of a famous mark or an attempt to trade upon its reputation”. 
U svojem mišljenju u preliminarnoj presudi Intel nezavisna odvjetnica Sharpston na nepošteno se iskorištavanje osvrnula na sljedeći način: „Pojmom nepoštenog iskorištavanja razlikovnog karaktera ili ugleda žiga moraju se obuhvatiti i situacije u kojima postoji jasno iskorištavanje i ubacivanje u područje djelovanja poznatog žiga ili pokušaj trgovanja njegovim ugledom.
Thus by way of example Rolls Royce would be entitled to prevent a manufacturer of whisky from exploiting the reputation of the Rolls Royce mark in order to promote his brand. 
Na taj bi način, primjerice, društvo Rolls Royce imalo pravo spriječiti proizvođača viskija da iskorištava ugled žiga „Rolls Royce” da bi promicao svoju robnu marku.
It is not obvious that there is any real difference between taking advantage of a mark's distinctive character and taking advantage of its repute; since however nothing turns on any such difference in the present case, I shall refer to both as free-riding' (para. 33). 
Nije očito da postoji stvarna razlika između iskorištavanja razlikovnog karaktera žiga i iskorištavanja njegova ugleda; s obzirom na to da ipak nijedan čimbenik ne upućuje na takvu razliku u ovom predmetu, oboje ću smatrati provlačenjem” (t. 33.).
‘… the reputation of the trade mark CITIBANK in the European Community in regard to banking services is not disputed. 
„[…] ugled žiga ‚CITIBANK' u Europskoj zajednici u vezi s bankarskim uslugama ne dovodi se u pitanje.
That reputation is associated with features of the banking sector, namely, solvency, probity and financial support to private and commercial clients in their professional and investment activities. 
Taj se ugled povezuje sa značajkama bankarskog sektora, odnosno solventnošću, poštenošću i financijskom potporom privatnim i komercijalnim klijentima u njihovim profesionalnim i ulagačkim aktivnostima”.
' ‘…there is a clear relationship … between the services of customs agencies and the financial services offered by banks such as the applicants, in that clients who are involved in international trade and in the import and export of goods also use the financial and banking services, which such transactions require. 
„[…] postoji jasna veza... između usluga carinskih agencija i financijskih usluga koje pružaju banke kao što je ona podnositelja prijave, u smislu da klijenti koji su uključeni u međunarodnu trgovinu te u uvoz i izvoz proizvoda isto tako upotrebljavaju financijske i bankarske usluge koje takve transakcije zahtijevaju.
It follows that there is a probability that such clients will be familiar with the applicants' bank given its extensive reputation at international level.' 
Iz toga slijedi da postoji mogućnost da će takvi klijenti biti upoznati s bankom podnositelja prijave zbog njezina velikog ugleda na međunarodnoj razini”.
‘In those circumstances, the Court holds that there is a high probability that the use of the trade mark applied for, CITI, by customs agencies, and therefore for financial agency activities in the management of money and real estate for clients, may lead to free-riding, that is to say, it would take unfair advantage of the well-established reputation of the trade mark CITIBANK and the considerable investments undertaken by the applicants to achieve that reputation. 
„U tim okolnostima Sud smatra da postoji velika mogućnost da uporaba žiga ‚CITI', za koji je podnesena prijava, među carinskim agencijama te stoga i za aktivnosti financijske agencije u upravljanju novcem i nekretninama klijenata, može dovesti do provlačenja odnosno nepoštenog iskorištavanja afirmiranog ugleda žiga ‚CITIBANK' i znatnih ulaganja podnositelja prijave u stjecanje takvog ugleda.
That use of the trade mark applied for, CITI, could also lead to the perception that the intervener is associated with or belongs to the applicants and, therefore, could facilitate the marketing of services covered by the trade mark applied for. 
Uporaba žiga ‚CITI' za koji je podnesena prijava može dovesti i do shvaćanja da se podnositelja prigovora povezuje s posrednikom ili da on njima pripada te se njome, stoga, može olakšati oglašavanje usluga obuhvaćenih žigom za koji je podnesena prijava.
That risk is further increased because the applicants are the holders of several trade marks containing the component “citi”' (paras 81 to 83). 
Rizik je dodatno uvećan jer su podnositelji prijave nositelji nekoliko žigova koji sadržavaju element ‚citi'” (t. 81. - 83.).
MINERAL SPA (for soaps, perfumeries, essential oils, preparations for body and beauty care, preparations for the hair, dentifrices in Class 3) could take unfair advantage of the image of the earlier trade mark SPA and the message conveyed by it in that the goods covered by the contested application would be perceived by the relevant public as supplying health, beauty and purity. 
Žigom ‚MINERAL SPA' (za sapune, parfeme, esencijalna ulja, pripravke za njegu tijela i ljepotu, pripravke za kosu, paste za zube razreda 3.) može se nepošteno iskoristiti imidž ranijeg žiga ‚SPA' i poruke koju on prenosi, odnosno da relevantna javnost proizvode obuhvaćene osporavanom prijavom može smatrati proizvodima kojima se pružaju usluge u području zdravlja, ljepote i čistoće.
It is not a question of whether toothpaste and perfume contain mineral water, but whether the public may think that the goods concerned are produced from or with mineral water (paras 43 and 44). 
Nije pitanje sadržavaju li pasta za zube i parfem mineralnu vodu, već može li javnost pomisliti da su predmetni proizvodi proizvedeni od mineralne vode ili s mineralnom vodom (t. 43. i 44.).
Earlier reputed sign Case No 
Raniji znak s ugledom Broj predmeta
L'Oréal et al. 12/07/2011, C324/09 (preliminary ruling) 
L'Oréal et al. 12/07/2011, C324/09 (preliminarna presuda)
According to L'Oréal et al., the defendants manufactured and imported perfume that was a ‘smellalike' of L'Oréal's fragrances but sold at a considerably lower price, using packaging that was reminiscent of the get-up covered by L'Oréal's marks. 
U skladu s predmetom L'Oréal et al., tužene su strane proizvodile i uvozile parfeme koji su „mirisom nalikovali” mirisima društva L'Oréal, ali su se prodavali po znatno nižim cijenama u ambalaži koja je podsjećala na izgled žigova društva L'Oréal.
The defendants used comparison lists to present the perfumes, which they marketed as being imitations or replicas of goods bearing a trade mark with repute. 
Tužene strane upotrebljavale su usporedne popise kako bi predstavile parfeme koje su stavljale na tržište kao imitacije ili replike proizvoda koji su nosili žig s ugledom.
Under Council Directive 84/450/EEC, comparative advertising that presents the advertiser's products as an imitation of a product bearing a trade mark is inconsistent with fair competition and thus unlawful. 
Prema Direktivi Vijeća 84/450 usporedno oglašavanje u okviru kojeg se proizvode oglašivača predstavlja kao imitaciju proizvoda sa žigom nije u skladu s poštenim tržišnim natjecanjem te je stoga nezakonito.
Therefore, any advantage gained by the advertiser through such advertising will have been achieved as a result of unfair competition and must be regarded as taking unfair advantage of the reputation of that mark). 
Stoga će se za bilo kakvu prednost dobivenu oglašavanjem putem takvih oglasa smatrati da je postignuta nepoštenim tržišnim natjecanjem i mora se smatrati nepoštenim iskorištavanjem ugleda toga žiga.
‘Taking account of the fact that the financial and stock market listing services supplied by the intervener under its trade mark Nasdaq and, therefore, the trade mark Nasdaq itself, undeniably present a certain image of modernity [the link between the signs] enables the transfer of that image to sports equipment and, in particular, to the high-tech composite materials which would be marketed by the applicant under the mark applied for, which the applicant appears to recognise implicitly by stating that the word ‘nasdaq' is descriptive of its main activities. 
„Uzimajući u obzir činjenicu da financijske i burzovne usluge koje pruža posrednik pod svojim žigom ‚Nasdaq' te stoga i sam žig ‚Nasdaq' zasigurno čine određeni imidž suvremenosti koji se [vezom između znakova] može prenijeti na sportsku opremu, posebno na visokotehnološke materijale koje bi podnositelj prijave stavio na tržište pod žigom za koji je podnesena prijava, a koji on implicitno prepoznaje tvrdeći da riječ ‚nasdaq' opisuje njegove glavne aktivnosti.
Therefore, in light of that evidence, and taking account of the similarity of the marks at issue, the importance of the reputation and the highly distinctive character of the trade mark Nasdaq, it must be held that the intervener has established prima facie the existence of a future risk, which is not hypothetical, of unfair advantage being drawn by the applicant, by the use of the mark applied for, from the reputation of the trade mark Nasdaq. 
Stoga, uzimajući u obzir te dokaze te imajući na umu sličnost predmetnih žigova, važnost ugleda i visoku razinu razlikovnog karaktera žiga ‚Nasdaq', mora se zaključiti da je posrednik utvrdio prima facie postojanje budućeg rizika, koji nije hipotetski, od nepoštenog iskorištavanja ugleda žiga ‚Nasdaq' uporabom žiga za koji je podnesena prijava.
There is therefore no need to set aside the contested decision on that point' (paras 60 and 61). 
Shodno tomu, osporavanu odluku o tom pitanju ne treba ukinuti” (t. 60. i 61.).
There is a certain proximity and link between entertainment services and beer, even a certain similarity due to their complementarity. 
Postoji određena bliskost i veza između usluga zabave i piva, čak i određena sličnost zbog njihove komplementarnosti.
The public in the United Kingdom would be able to make a link with the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) when seeing a beer with the contested mark Royal Shakespeare in a supermarket or in a bar. 
Javnost u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini mogla bi povezati osporavani žig „Royal Shakespeare” s kazališnim ansamblom Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC) kada vidi pivo u supermarketu ili baru.
The contested mark would benefit from the power of attraction, the reputation and the prestige of the earlier mark for its own goods and services, which would attract the consumers' attention thanks to the association with RSC, thereby gaining a commercial advantage over its competitors' goods. 
Osporavani žig imao bi koristi od snage privlačnosti, ugleda i prestiža ranijeg žiga za vlastite proizvode i usluge kojima bi se privukla pozornost potrošača zahvaljujući asocijaciji s RSC-om te bi se za njih na taj način osigurala trgovačka prednost pred konkurentskim proizvodima.
The economic advantage would consist of exploiting the effort expended by RSC to establish the reputation and the image of its earlier mark without paying any compensation in exchange. 
Gospodarska prednost sastojala bi se od iskorištavanja nastojanja RSC-a u pogledu uspostave ugleda i imidža svojeg ranijeg žiga bez plaćanja ikakve naknade u zamjenu.
That equates to an unfair advantage (para. 61). 
To je jednako nepoštenom iskorištavanju (t. 61.).
While recognising that the primary function of a trade mark was as an indicator of origin, the General Court held that a mark could also serve to transmit other messages, concerning particular qualities or characteristics of the designated goods or services, or the images and sensations projected by the mark itself, such as luxury, lifestyle, exclusivity, adventure or youth. 
Uvažavajući činjenicu da je primarna funkcija žiga bila oznaka podrijetla, Opći sud utvrdio je da žig može služiti i za prijenos drugih poruka o određenim kvalitetama ili obilježjima predmetnih proizvoda ili usluga ili predodžbi i doživljaja koje projicira sam žig, npr. luksuza, životnog stila, ekskluzivnosti, avanture ili mladosti.
In this sense, a trade mark possessed an intrinsic economic value that was autonomous and distinct to that of the goods or services for which it was registered (para. 57). 
U tom smislu, žig ima vlastitu gospodarsku vrijednost koja je bila autonomna i razlikovna u odnosu na proizvode ili usluge za koje je registriran (t. 57.).
The risk of taking unfair advantage encompasses cases of manifest exploitation or parasitism of a mark with reputation, namely the risk of transferring the image of the mark with reputation or the characteristics projected by it to the goods covered by the mark applied for, thus facilitating the marketing of those goods through association with the earlier mark with reputation (para. 59). 
Rizikom od nepoštenog iskorištavanja obuhvaćeni su slučajevi očitog iskorištavanja ili parazitizma žiga s ugledom, odnosno rizik od prijenosa imidža žiga s ugledom ili obilježja koja se njime projiciraju na proizvode obuhvaćene žigom za koji je podnesena prijava, čime se olakšava oglašavanje tih proizvoda putem asocijacije s ranijim žigom s ugledom (t. 59.).