natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court found that the opponent had failed to submit opinion polls showing the recognition of the ‘winged hourglass' logo independently of the word element, and the use of this figurative element alone in a limited number of documents was found insufficient from both a quantitative and qualitative point of view (paras 91 to 93 and para. 112). 
Sud je utvrdio da podnositelj prigovora nije podnio ispitivanja javnog mnijenja kojima bi dokazao prepoznatljivost „pješčanog sata s krilima” neovisno o verbalnom elementu, a sama uporaba tog figurativnog elementa u ograničenom broju dokumenata nije bila dovoljna ni s kvantitativnog ni kvalitativnog gledišta (t. 91. - 93. i t. 112.).
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq, EU:T:2007:131 The opponent provided detailed evidence relating to the intensity, geographical extent and duration of use of its trade mark, Nasdaq, as well as to the amount spent in promoting it, demonstrating that it was known by a significant part of the relevant public. 
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq, EU:T:2007:131 Podnositelj prigovora dostavio je podrobne dokaze o intenzitetu, zemljopisnom opsegu i trajanju uporabe svojeg žiga „Nasdaq” te o iznosu potrošenom na njegovu promidžbu, čime je dokazao da je žig bio poznat znatnom dijelu relevantne javnosti.
The Court considered that the fact that it did not produce figures regarding market share did not call this finding into question (para. 51). 
Sud je smatrao da činjenica da nisu dostavljeni brojčani podatci o tržišnom udjelu ne dovodi u pitanje taj nalaz (t. 51.).
The Court concluded that, first, the factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serve as examples, as all relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence produced by the intervener is already sufficient in itself to conclusively prove the reputation of its mark, Nasdaq (para. 52). 
Sud je ponajprije zaključio da popis čimbenika koje treba uzeti u obzir kako bi se utvrdio ugled ranijeg žiga služi samo kao primjer jer se moraju uzeti u obzir svi relevantni dokazi u predmetu te da su, osim toga, ostali podrobni i provjerljivi dokazi koje je posrednik iznio dovoljni sami po sebi kako bi se definitivno dokazao ugled njegova žiga „Nasdaq” (t. 52.).
24/02/2010, R 765/20091, Bob the Builder (fig.) / BOB et al. The evidence submitted proved that the earlier mark enjoyed a very significant reputation in Sweden for jellies, jams, fruit stews, fruit drinks, concentrates for production of drinks and juice'. 
24/02/2010, R 765/20091, Bob the Builder (fig.) / BOB et al. Podneseni dokazi upućivali su na to da je raniji žig imao vrlo velik ugled u Švedskoj za „želee, džemove, dinstano voće, voćne napitke, koncentrate za proizvodnju napitaka i voćnih sokova”.
According to the survey conducted by TNS Gallup, spontaneous awareness (answers by telephone to the question ‘What brands for - ‘the relevant group of products is mentioned' - have you heard about or do you know about?') of the trade mark ‘BOB' varied between 25 % and 71 %, depending on the goods: apple sauces, jams, marmalades, soft drinks, fruit drinks and fruit juices. 
Prema istraživanju koje je provelo društvo TNS Gallup, spontana svjesnost (telefonski odgovori na pitanje „Za koje ste robne marke - spominje se relevantna skupina proizvoda - čuli ili koje poznajete?”) o žigu „BOB” kretala se od 25 do 71 % ovisno o proizvodu: umaci od jabuka, džemovi, marmelade, negazirana pića, voćni napitci i voćni sokovi.
Supported awareness (answers to a questionnaire showing the products bearing the mark) varied between 49 % and 90 %, depending on the goods. 
Podržana svjesnost (odgovori na upitnik u kojem se pokazuju proizvodi koji nose žig) kretala se od 49 do 90 % ovisno o proizvodu.
Furthermore, the market share for 2001 to 2006 averaged 30-35 % in the above product groups (para. 34). 
Nadalje, tržišni udjel za razdoblje od 2001. do 2006. iznosio je u prosjeku 30 - 35 % za prethodno navedenu skupinu proizvoda (t. 34.).
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, confirmed 10/05/2012, C100/11 P ‘… the size of the market share of BOTOX in the United Kingdom, 74.3 % in 2003, like the degree of awareness of the trade mark of 75 % among the specialised public accustomed to pharmaceutical treatments against wrinkles, is sufficient to substantiate the existence of a considerable degree of recognition on the market' (para. 76). 
16/12/2010, T345/08 & T357/08, Botolist / Botocyl, potvrđeno 10/05/2012, C100/11 P „[...] veličina tržišnog udjela žiga „BOTOX” u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini od 74,3 % 2003. godine, kao i razina svjesnosti o žigu od 75 % u specijaliziranoj javnosti naviknutoj na farmaceutske tretmane protiv bora dovoljna je da bi se dokazalo postojanje znatne razine prepoznatljivosti na tržištu” (t. 76.).
13/12/2004, T08/03, Emilio Pucci, EU:T:2004:358 The Court considered that the opponent failed to prove the enhanced distinctiveness or reputation of its earlier trade marks, since the evidence submitted (advertisements, seven letters from a number of advertising directors and a video cassette) did not include adequately substantiated or verifiable objective evidence to make it possible to assess the market share held by the marks Emilio Pucci in Spain, how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing use of the marks had been, or the amount invested by the undertaking in promoting them (para. 73). 
13/12/2004, T08/03, Emilio Pucci, EU:T:2004:358 Sud je smatrao da podnositelj prigovora nije uspio dokazati naglašenu razlikovnost ili ugled svojih ranijih žigova jer podneseni dokazi (reklame, sedam pisama reklamnih direktora i videokaseta) nisu obuhvaćali prikladno potkrijepljene ili provjerljive objektivne dokaze kako bi se mogao procijeniti tržišni udjel koji imaju žigovi „Emilio Pucci” u Španjolskoj, intenzivnost, zemljopisni opseg i trajanje uporabe ili iznos koji je poduzeće uložilo u njihovu promidžbu (t. 73.).
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112, KENZO / KENZO KENZO identifies, in the eyes of the European public, a pre-eminent provider of recognised fashion and luxury items in the form of perfumes, cosmetics and clothing. 
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112, KENZO / KENZO „KENZO” u očima europske javnosti predstavlja uglednog dobavljača poznatih modnih i luksuznih proizvoda u obliku parfema, kozmetike i odjeće.
The relevant public however was considered to be the general public (para. 29). 
Međutim, relevantnom javnošću smatrala se šira javnost (t. 29.).
12/01/2011, R 446/20101, TURBOMANIA / TURBOMANIA The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public. 
12/01/2011, R 446/20101, TURBOMANIA / TURBOMANIA Ograničena prisutnost proizvoda na tržištu nikako nije onemogućila da proizvod bude vrlo dobro poznat relevantnoj javnosti.
The evidence clearly showed that the trade mark appeared continuously in specialist magazines for the market from December 2003 to March 2007 (the date of the EUTM application). 
Dokazi su jasno pokazivali da se žig stalno pojavljivao u specijaliziranim časopisima za to tržište od prosinca 2003. do ožujka 2007. (datum podnošenja prijave za žig EU-a).
That meant that the public targeted by the magazines had constant, ongoing exposure to the opponent's trade mark over a long period covering more than 3 years prior to the relevant date. 
To je značilo da je ciljana javnost toga časopisa bila stalno i neprekidno izložena žigu podnositelja prigovora tijekom dugog razdoblja koje je obuhvaćalo više od tri godine prije relevantnog datuma.
Such a huge presence in the press specifically targeting the relevant public was more than sufficient evidence that the relevant public was aware of the trade mark (para. 31). 
Takva intenzivna prisutnost u tiskovinama posebno namijenjenima relevantnoj javnosti bila je sasvim dovoljan dokaz da je relevantna javnost svjesna žiga (t. 31.).
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq The opponent submitted evidence showing that the mark Nasdaq appeared almost daily, particularly with reference to the Nasdaq indices, in many newspapers and on many television channels that can be read/viewed throughout Europe. 
10/05/2007, T47/06, Nasdaq Podnositelj prigovora podnio je dokaze kojima pokazuje da se žig „Nasdaq” pojavljuje gotovo svakodnevno, posebno u vezi s Nasdaq indeksima, u brojnim novinama i na mnogim televizijskim kanalima koji se mogu čitati/gledati diljem Europe.
The opponent also submitted evidence of substantial investments in advertising. 
Podnositelj prigovora podnio je i dokaze u pogledu znatnih ulaganja u oglašavanje.
The Court found reputation proven, even though the opponent did not submit any market share figures (paras 47 to 52). 
Sud je zaključio da je ugled dokazan, iako podnositelj prigovora nije podnio nikakve brojčane podatke o tržišnom udjelu (t. 47. - 52.).
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. The documents submitted (press articles, sales figures, surveys) showed that the earlier sign, CIALIS, was intensively used before the filing date of the EUTM application, that the products under the mark CIALIS were marketed in several Member States where they enjoyed a consolidated position among the leading brands, and that there was a high degree of recognition when compared with the market leader Viagra. 
15/09/2011, R 2100/20101, SEXIALIS / CIALIS et al. Podnesenom dokumentacijom (članci iz novina, brojčani podatci o prodaji, istraživanja) pokazano je da se raniji žig „CIALIS” intenzivno upotrebljavao prije datuma podnošenja prijave za žig EU-a, da su proizvodi koji nose žig „CIALIS” bili na tržištu u nekoliko država članica u kojima su imali konsolidirani položaj među vodećim robnim markama te da je postojala visoka razina prepoznatljivosti u usporedbi s vodećom markom na tržištu „Viagra”.
Large and constantly growing market share and sales numbers also showed ‘the vast expansion of CIALIS' (para. 55). 
Velikim i stalno rastućim tržišnim udjelom te podatcima o prodaji jednako je tako pokazano „veliko širenje žiga ‚CIALIS'” (t. 55.).
Reputation was not sufficiently proven, in particular because none of the documents referred to recognition of the earlier trade mark by the relevant end consumers. 
Ugled nije dovoljno detaljno dokazan, osobito jer se nijedan dokument nije odnosio na prepoznatljivost ranijeg žiga među relevantnim krajnjim potrošačima.
Nor was any evidence about the market share of the opponent's goods submitted. 
Nisu priloženi ni dokazi o tržišnom udjelu proizvoda podnositelja prigovora.
Information about market share is particularly important in the sector in which the opponent had its core business (handbags, transport items, accessories and clothing), as it is ‘a quite atomized and competitive sector' and ‘there are many different competitors and designers in that product range' (paras 59 to 61). 
Informacije o tržišnom udjelu posebno su važne u sektoru u kojem je podnositelj prigovora obavljao svoju osnovnu djelatnost (ručne torbe, predmeti koji se upotrebljavaju u prijevozu, dodatci i odjeća) i koji je „vrlo atomiziran i konkurentan” te „postoje mnogi različiti konkurenti i dizajneri u tom asortimanu proizvoda” (t. 59. - 61.).
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Although, for reasons of force majeure, it was not possible for the earlier trade mark to become well known by traditional methods, that is, through sales of the product, it did become extremely well known as a result of promotional activities, through the trade mark being extensively, continually and constantly publicised in the specialist press and at sector fairs, thereby reaching virtually the whole of the three relevant sectors of the public. 
12/01/2011, R 445/20101, FLATZ / FLATZ Iako raniji žig zbog više sile nije mogao postati dobro poznat uporabom tradicionalnih metoda, odnosno prodajom proizvoda, on je ipak postao vrlo dobro poznat putem promidžbenih aktivnosti, odnosno opsežnim oglašavanjem žiga, stalno i neprekidno u specijaliziranim tiskovinama i na sektorskim sajmovima, čime je dospio do gotovo triju cijelih relevantnih sektora javnosti.
The limited presence of the product on the market by no means prevented it from becoming well known by the relevant public that, on the relevant date, FLATZ was the trade mark with which the opponent identified its electronic bingo machines (paras 41, 42, 50 and 51). 
Ograničena prisutnost proizvoda na tržištu nikako nije onemogućila da proizvod postane dobro poznat u relevantnoj javnosti te je na relevantni datum žig „FLATZ” bio žig kojim je podnositelj prigovora identificirao svoje elektroničke uređaje za igranje tombole (t. 41., 42., 50. i 51.).
The lack of figures regarding market share held by the trade mark ARENA in the relevant countries was not in itself capable of calling the finding of reputation into question. 
Nedostatak brojčanih podataka o tržišnom udjelu žiga „ARENA” u relevantnim zemljama sam po sebi nije bio dostatan da se dovede u pitanje nalaz o ugledu.
First, the list of factors to be taken into consideration in order to ascertain the reputation of an earlier mark only serves to illustrate examples, as all the relevant evidence in the case must be taken into consideration and, second, the other detailed and verifiable evidence submitted by the opponent is already sufficient in itself to prove conclusively the substantial degree of recognition of the ARENA mark amongst the relevant public (para. 59). 
Kao prvo, popis čimbenika koje treba uzeti u obzir da bi se utvrdio ugled ranijeg žiga služi samo kao primjer jer se moraju uzeti u obzir svi relevantni dokazi u određenom slučaju, a kao drugo, ostali podrobni i provjerljivi dokazi koje je podnositelj prigovora podnio sami su po sebi dovoljni da bi se definitivno dokazao znatan postotak prepoznatljivosti žiga „ARENA” u relevantnoj javnosti (t. 59.).
If the earlier mark were so well known in the 27 Member States of the EU for TV broadcasting and magazines, it should have been easy for the opponent to provide information about ‘the reach of the mark' just before 2008, when the EUTM application was filed. 
Ako je raniji žig bio vrlo dobro poznat u 27 država članica EU-a zbog prikazivanja na televiziji i objavljivanja u časopisima, podnositelju prigovora trebalo bi biti jednostavno pružiti informacije o „dosegu žiga” neposredno prije 2008., kada je podnesena prijava za žig EU-a.
The magazine sales figures did not cover the right period. 
Brojčani podatci o prodaji časopisa nisu obuhvaćali točno razdoblje.
Nor did the documents submitted give any indication of the extent to which the public was aware of the mark (paras 16 and 18). 
Jednako tako, podnesenim dokumentima nisu se pružili nikakvi pokazatelji opsega svjesnosti javnosti o žigu (t. 16. i 18.).
The evidence submitted showed a particularly impressive duration of use (over 30 years) and geographical extent of use (over seventy-five countries worldwide, including the Member States concerned) for the ARENA brand (para. 55). 
Podnesenim dokazima pokazano je vrlo dojmljivo trajanje uporabe (više od 30 godina) i zemljopisni opseg uporabe (više od 75 zemalja diljem svijeta, uključujući predmetne države članice) robne marke „ARENA” (t. 55.).
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (appeal dismissed in 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) The Beatles group was considered to be a group with an exceptional reputation, lasting for more than 40 years (para. 36). 
29/03/2012, T369/10, Beatle, EU:T:2012:177 (žalba odbačena u predmetu od 14/05/2013, C294/12 P, EU:C:2013:300) Skupina Beatles smatra se skupinom s iznimnim ugledom koji traje više od 40 godina (t. 36.).
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Evidence of the promotion of BOTOX in English in the scientific and general-interest press was sufficient to establish the mark's reputation amongst both the general public and health-care professionals (paras 65 and 66). 
10/05/2012, C100/11 P, Botolist / Botocyl Dokazi o promidžbi ranijeg žiga „BOTOX” na engleskom jeziku u znanstvenim i općim tiskovinama bili su dovoljni za utvrđivanje ugleda žiga u široj javnosti i među zdravstvenim djelatnicima (t. 65. i 66.).
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO The opponent's goods have been advertised and articles have been written about them in many of the world's leading fashion-related lifestyle magazines, and in some of Europe's leading mainstream periodicals. 
29/05/2012, R 1659/20112 KENZO / KENZO; 25/03/2013, R 1364/20122, KENZO / KENZO Proizvodi podnositelja prigovora oglašavali su se i o njima se pisalo u mnogim vodećim svjetskim modnim časopisima, kao i u nekim vodećim europskim općim časopisima.
In line with the case-law, the reputation of KENZO for the said goods is confirmed. 
U skladu sa sudskom praksom, potvrđen je ugled žiga „KENZO” za navedene proizvode.
The goods for which the earlier mark has reputation are cosmetics, perfumes and clothing. 
Proizvodi za koje raniji žig ima ugled jesu kozmetički proizvodi, parfemi i odjeća.
Because of its substantial reputation, the earlier mark KENZO possesses an ‘undisputable allure' that can be transferred to nearly any luxury product (para. 33). 
Zbog njegova znatnog ugleda, raniji žig „KENZO” ima „neospornu privlačnost” koja se može prenijeti na gotovo sve luksuzne proizvode (t. 33.).
A subsequent case confirmed this reputation (para. 33). 
U kasnijem je predmetu taj ugled potvrđen (t. 33.).
It is apparent from Ferrero's various advertising campaigns on Italian television (including Rai) that the earlier mark was widely exposed to viewers in 2005 and 2006. 
Iz različitih reklamnih kampanja Ferrera na talijanskoj televiziji (uključujući Rai) očito je da je raniji žig 2005. i 2006. bio u velikoj mjeri izložen gledateljima.
Many of these spots appear to have been broadcast at peak viewing times (e.g. during Formula 1 Grand Prix coverage) (para. 41). 
Mnogi od tih reklamnih spotova prikazivali su se u vrijeme najveće gledanosti (npr. tijekom prijenosa utrka Grand Prix Formule 1) (t. 41.).
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (under appeal, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) The opponent's trade mark is not only known per se but, due to the high price of sports cars and the opponent's intensive expenditure on advertising, and against the background of its successes in racing, the public associates it with an image of luxury, high technology and high performance (para. 31). 
11/01/2011, R 306/20104, CARRERA / CARRERA, (pobijana presuda, 27/11/2014, T173/11, Carrera / CARRERA, EU:T:2014:1001) Žig podnositelja prigovora nije samo poznat sam po sebi, već ga zbog visoke cijene sportskih automobila i znatnih troškova koje je podnositelj prigovora uložio u oglašavanje te prema njegovim uspjesima u utrkama javnost povezuje s imidžom luksuza, visoke tehnologije i visoke učinkovitosti (t. 31.).
It was therefore considered that the appellant successfully proved reputation in Poland for jewellery, but did not prove reputation for the other goods and services covered by its earlier signs. 
Stoga se smatralo da je podnositelj žalbe uspješno dokazao ugled u Poljskoj u vezi s nakitom, ali nije dokazao ugled za ostale proizvode i usluge obuhvaćene njegovim ranijim znakovima.
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (confirmed 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) The Board of Appeal may take into consideration, in addition to the facts expressly put forward by the parties, facts that are well known, that is, which are likely to be known by anyone or that may be learnt from generally accessible sources. 
22/06/2004, T185/02, Picaro, EU:T:2004:189 (potvrđeno 12/01/2006, C361/04 P, Picaro, EU:C:2006:25) Žalbeno vijeće, osim činjenica koje su stranke izričito navele, može uzeti u obzir i činjenice koje su dobro poznate, odnosno koje su najvjerojatnije poznate svima ili koje se mogu saznati iz opće dostupnih izvora.
That exception must therefore be given a strict interpretation, defining its extent so as not to exceed what is necessary for achieving its object' (paras 29 to 32). 
Uredbe o žigu EU-a] čini iznimku od načela ispitivanja činjenica koje provodi [Ured] na vlastitu inicijativu iznesenog na početku tom odredbom.
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO It is common knowledge that the earlier mark is indeed a very famous brand, not only in France, but in most European countries, in large part due to the public's exposure to products at airport and duty free boutiques as well as long-standing advertising in widely circulated magazines. 
30/03/2009, R 1472/20072, El Polo / POLO Opće je poznato da je raniji žig doista vrlo poznata robna marka, ne samo u Francuskoj, već i u većini europskih zemalja, a uglavnom zbog izloženosti javnosti proizvodima u zračnim lukama i bescarinskim trgovinama, kao i zbog dugogodišnjeg oglašavanja u visokotiražnim časopisima.
The weight of evidence required to support statements that are universally known to be true need not be great (para. 32). 
Teret dokaza potreban kako bi se potkrijepile izjave koje su općepoznate kao istinite ne mora biti velik (t. 32.).
The documentation emanates, in the main, from the respondent directly and contains information taken from its trade catalogues, its own advertising and documents downloaded from its website. 
Dokumentacija uglavnom proizlazi izravno od tuženika i sadržava informacije iz njegovih trgovačkih kataloga, reklama i dokumenata preuzetih s njegovog mrežnog mjesta.
There is insufficient documentation/information from third parties to reflect clearly and objectively what precisely the respondent's position on the market is. 
Nema dovoljno dokumenata/informacija od trećih strana koje bi jasno i objektivno odražavale točan položaj tuženika na tržištu.
Reputation not proved (para. 26). 
Ugled nije dokazan (t. 26.).
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, As regards documents in the case file that come from the company itself, the General Court has held that, to assess the evidential value of such a document, account should be taken first and foremost of the credibility of the account it contains. 
16/11/2011, T500/10, Doorsa, Kada je riječ o dokumentaciji u spisu koji je podnijelo samo društvo, Opći sud utvrdio je da bi za procjenu dokazne vrijednosti takvog dokumenta trebalo prije svega uzeti u obzir vjerodostojnost iskaza koji sadržava.
The General Court added that it is then necessary to take account, in particular, of the person from whom the document originates, the circumstances in which it came into being, the person to whom it was addressed and whether, prima facie, the documents appear sound and reliable (para. 49). 
Opći sud dodao je da je u tom slučaju potrebno posebno uzeti u obzir osobu od koje dokument potječe, okolnosti u kojima je nastao, osobu kojoj je bio namijenjen i čine li se na prvi pogled dokumenti utemeljenima i pouzdanima (t. 49.).
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. The statement submitted by an expert consultancy firm in the area of digital media strategy in the UK attests to the fact that the opponent is ‘the leading supplier of digital television in the UK' and that ‘Sky has an enormous and impressive reputation' (para. 37). 
12/05/2011, R 729/20091, SKYBLOG / SKY et al. U izjavi koju je podnijelo stručno konzultantsko društvo iz područja strategije digitalnih medija iz Ujedinjene Kraljevine potvrđuje se da je podnositelj prigovora „vodeći dobavljač digitalne televizije u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini” te da žig „Sky” ima iznimno velik i dojmljiv ugled” (t. 37.).
17/12/2010, T192/09, Seve Trophy, EU:T:2010:553 As far as judgments of Spanish courts are concerned, the European Union trade mark system is an autonomous system, consisting of a set of rules and objectives that are specific and applied independently of any national system (para. 79). 
17/12/2010, T192/09, SeveTrophy, EU:T:2010:553 Kada je riječ o presudama španjolskih sudova, sustav žigova Europske unije autonomni je sustav koji se sastoji od niza pravila i ciljeva koji su specifični te se primjenjuju neovisno o nacionalnom sustavu (t. 79.).