natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The precise sequence of the stills is as follows: In the 1st still, the ribbon enters the frame in the upper edge of the frame and flows down the right edge of the frame, before flowing upward in the 2nd to 6th stills. 
Točan je niz uzastopnih statičnih slika sljedeći: Na statičnoj slici 1. vrpca ulazi u okvir na gornjem rubu okvira te se kreće prema donjem desnom rubu okvira, a zatim na slikama 2. do 6. kreće prema gore.
During that phase of motion (in the 4th still) the end of the ribbon is shown, producing the effect of a trailing ribbon. 
Tijekom te faze pokreta (na slici 4.) prikazuje se završetak vrpce, čime se dobiva učinak vrpce koja vijori.
In the 6th to 17th stills, the ribbon flows counterclockwise around the frame. 
Na slikama 6. do 17. vrpca se kreće unutar okvira u smjeru suprotnom od kazaljke na satu.
From the 9th still onwards, the sphere appears in the centre of the frame. 
Od slike 9. nadalje u središtu okvira pojavljuje se kugla.
The interior of the sphere is the same colour as the ribbon. 
Unutrašnjost kugle iste je boje kao i vrpca.
The ribbon flows around the sphere. 
Vrpca se kreće oko kugle.
In the 14th still, the ribbon enters the sphere, as if being pulled inside. 
Na slici 14. vrpca ulazi u kuglu kao da je nešto uvlači unutra.
In the 15th to 17th stills, the ribbon disappears inside the sphere. 
Na slikama 15. do 17. vrpca nestaje unutar kugle.
In the 19th and 20th stills, the sphere moves toward the viewer, gaining in size and ending the motion. 
Na slikama 19. i 20. kugla se približava prema gledatelju dobivajući na veličini i time pokret završava.
Description: The mark is an animated sequence with two flared segments that join in the upper right portion of the mark. 
Opis: Žig je animirana sekvenca s dva raširena segmenta koji se spajaju u gornjem desnom dijelu žiga.
During the animation sequence, a geometric object moves upwards adjacent to the first segment and then downwards adjacent to the second segment, while individual chords within each segment turn from dark to light. 
Tijekom animirane sekvence, geometrijsko tijelo podiže se pokraj prvog segmenta, a onda spušta pokraj drugog segmenta, dok pojedinačni kraci unutar svakog segmenta prelaze iz tamnog u svijetle.
The stippling in the mark is for shading only. 
Točkanje prikazano na žigu služi samo za sjenčanje.
The entire animated sequence lasts between 1 and 2 seconds. 
Cijela animirana sekvenca traje između jedne i dvije sekunde.
Description: The mark comprises a moving image consisting of a toothbrush moving towards a tomato, pressing onto the tomato without breaking the skin, and moving away from the tomato. 
Opis: Žig se sastoji od pokretne slike četkice za zube koja se primiče rajčici, pritišće rajčicu bez probijanja kožice te se odmiče od rajčice.
The Office rejected the application as it was not possible to establish the precise movement from the description provided along with the representation. 
Ured je odbio prijavu jer iz opisa priloženog uz prikaz nije bilo moguće utvrditi točno kretanje.
Description: The mark consists of an animated sequence on a plain background, namely a door that can be opened in the following three stages: open/mid-open/closed or closed/mid-open/open, using the symbols ‘+' and ‘-'. 
Opis: Žig se sastoji od animirane sekvence na jednostavnoj pozadini, odnosno vrata koja se mogu otvoriti u sljedeće tri faze: otvorena/poluotvorena/zatvorena ili zatvorena/poluotvorena/otvorena, uporabom simbola „+” i „-”.
The length of the animation between the stages is half a second. 
Trajanje animacije između tih faza je pola sekunde.
The door and its frame are rectangular and are in the style of a basic geometric drawing with a small rectangular handle, opening onto a plain background. 
Vrata i njihov okvir pravokutnog su oblika u stilu osnovnog geometrijskog crteža s malom pravokutnom ručkom, a otvaraju se na jednostavnu pozadinu.
The symbols ‘+' and ‘-' are placed by each of the long edges of the frame. 
Simboli „+” i „-” smješteni su uz svaku od dužih stranica okvira.
The Office rejected the application as it was not possible to establish the precise movement from the description provided along with the graphic representation. 
Ured je odbio prijavu jer iz opisa priloženog uz grafički prikaz nije bilo moguće utvrditi točno kretanje.
A sign that consists of the opening and closing of a door by pushing buttons on the left or right of the latter is subject to the consumer's personal interpretation. 
Znak koji se sastoji od otvaranja i zatvaranja vrata pritiskom gumba na lijevoj ili desnoj strani vrata podliježe osobnoj interpretaciji potrošača.
27/10/2005, T305/04, Odeur de fraise mûre, EU:T:2005:380, § 34 The Court considered that the smell of strawberries varies from one variety to another and the description ‘smell of ripe strawberries' can refer to several varieties and therefore to several distinct smells. 
27/10/2005, T305/04, Odeur de fraise mûre, EU:T:2005:380, § 34 Sud je smatrao da miris jagoda varira od sorte do sorte, dok se opis „miris zrelih jagoda” može odnositi na nekoliko sorti i, prema tome, na više različitih mirisa.
The description was found neither unequivocal nor precise and did not eliminate all elements of subjectivity in the process of identifying and perceiving the sign claimed. 
Utvrđeno je da ovaj opis nije ni jednoznačan ni precizan, te da opis ne otklanja sve elemente subjektivnosti u procesu utvrđivanja i tumačenja traženog znaka.
Absolute Grounds for Refusal - Non-Distinctive Trade Marks 
Apsolutni razlozi za odbijanje - Nerazlikovni žigovi
CHAPTER 3 
POGLAVLJE 3.
NON-DISTINCTIVE TRADE MARKS 
NERAZLIKOVNI ŽIGOVI
(Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR) 
(Članak 7. stavak 1. točka (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a)
1 General Remarks 3 
1 Opće napomene 3
2 Word Elements 3 
2 Verbalni elementi 3
3 Titles of Books 5 
3 Naslovi knjiga 5
4 Single Letters 6 
4 Pojedinačna slova 6
4.1 General considerations 6 
4.1 Opća razmatranja 6
4.2 Examples 7 
4.2 Primjeri 7
5 Slogans: Assessing Distinctive Character 7 
5 Slogani: procjena razlikovnog karaktera 7
6 Simple Figurative Elements 11 
6 Jednostavni figurativni elementi 11
7 Commonplace Figurative Elements 12 
7 Obični figurativni elementi 12
8 Typographical Symbols 13 
8 Tipografski simboli 13
9 Pictograms 14 
9 Piktogrami 14
10 Common/Non-Distinctive Labels 16 
10 Obične/nerazlikovne etikete 16
11 Shape Marks 18 
11 Žigovi koje čini oblik 17
11.1 Preliminary remarks 18 
11.1 Uvodne napomene 17
11.2 Shapes unrelated to the goods or services themselves 18 
11.2 Oblici koji nisu povezani sa samim proizvodima ili uslugama 18
11.3 Shape of the goods themselves or shapes related to the goods or services 18 
11.3 Oblik samih proizvoda ili oblici povezani s proizvodima i uslugama 18
11.4 Shape of the packaging 25 
11.4 Oblik ambalaže 24
12 Position Marks 27 
12 Pozicijski žigovi 26
13 Pattern Marks 29 
13 Žigovi uzorka 28
14 Colour Marks 32 
14 Žigovi koje čini boja 31
14.1 Single Colours 32 
14.1 Pojedinačne boje 31
14.2 Colour combinations 33 
14.2 Kombinacije boja 32
15 Sound Marks 34 
15 Zvučni žigovi 33
16 Motion, Multimedia and Hologram Marks 36 
16 Žigovi koje čini pokret, multimedijalni i hologramski žigovi 35
Specific types of trade mark - namely ‘word mark', ‘figurative mark', ‘shape mark', ‘position mark', ‘pattern mark', ‘colour mark', ‘sound mark', ‘motion mark', ‘multimedia mark', and ‘hologram mark' - are now defined by law (Article 3(3)(a) to (j) EUTMIR). 
Sad su zakonom (članak 3. stavak 3. točka od (a) do (j) Uredbe o provedbi Uredbe o žigu EU-a) utvrđene posebne vrste žigova, konkretno: verbalni žig, figurativni žig, žig koji čini oblik, pozicijski žig, žig uzorka, žig u boji, zvučni žig, žig koji čini pokret, multimedijalni žig i hologramski žig.
Marks not covered by those specific types may, however, also be filed as EUTM applications (Article 3(4) EUTMIR). 
Međutim, i žigovi koji nisu obuhvaćeni tim posebnim vrstama žigova mogu se prijaviti kao žigovi EU-a (članak 3. stavak 4.
According to settled case-law, distinctiveness of a trade mark within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR means that the sign serves to identify the product and/or services in respect of which registration is applied for as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish that product from those of other undertakings (29/04/2004, C468/01 P - C472/01 P, Tabs (3D), EU:C:2004:259, § 32; 21/10/2004, C64/02 P, Das Prinzip der Bequemlichkeit, EU:C:2004:645, § 42; 08/05/2008, C304/06 P, Eurohypo, EU:C:2008:261, § 66; 21/01/2010, C398/08 P, Vorsprung durch Technik, EU:C:2010:29, § 33). 
U skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom razlikovni karakter žiga u smislu članka 7. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a znači da znak služi za utvrđivanje da proizvodi i/ili usluge za koje se predaje prijava za registraciju potječu iz određenog poduzeća i time za razlikovanje tog proizvoda od proizvoda drugih poduzeća (29/04/2004, C468/01 P - C472/01 P,Tabs (3D), EU:C:2004:259, § 32; 21/10/2004, C64/02 P Das Prinzip der Bequemlichkeit, EU:C:2004:645, § 42; 08/05/2008, C304/06 P Eurohypo, EU:C:2008:261, § 66; 21/01/2010, C398/08 P, Vorsprung durch Technik, EU:C:2010:29, § 33).
According to settled case-law, such distinctiveness can be assessed only by reference first to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the relevant public's perception of that sign (12/07/2012, C311/11 P, Wir machen das Besondere einfach, EU:C:2012:460, § 24 and case-law cited). 
Prema ustaljenoj sudskoj praksi navedeni razlikovni karakter može se procijeniti samo prvo upućivanjem na proizvode ili usluge za koje se traži registracija, a zatim na predodžbu relevantne javnosti o tom znaku (12/07/2012, C311/11 P, Wir machen das Besondere einfach, EU:C:2012:460, § 24 i navedena sudska praksa).
According to the case-law of the European courts, a word mark that is descriptive of characteristics of goods or services for the purposes of Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR is, on that account, necessarily devoid of any distinctive character with regard to the same goods or services for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR (12/06/2007, T190/05, Twist & Pour, EU:T:2007:171, § 39). 
U skladu sa sudskom praksom europskih sudova smatra se da verbalni žig koji opisuje obilježja proizvoda ili usluga u smislu članka 7. stavka 1. točke (c) Uredbe o žigu EU-a zbog te činjenice nema razlikovni karakter s obzirom na iste proizvode i usluge u smislu članka 7. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a (12/06/2007, T190/05, Twist & Pour, EU:T:2007:171, § 39).
In a similar vein, even though a given term might not be clearly descriptive with regard to the goods and services concerned, as to the point that an objection under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR would not apply, the term would still be objectionable under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR on the ground that it will be perceived by the relevant public as only providing information on the nature of the goods and/or services concerned and not as indicating their origin. 
Slično tome, iako taj pojam možda neće jasno opisivati predmetne proizvode i usluge u pogledu prigovora na temelju članka 7. stavka 1. točke (c) Uredbe o žigu EU-a koji se neće primjenjivati, taj bi pojam i dalje bio neprihvatljiv temeljem članka 7. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a iz razloga što će relevantna javnost smatrati da predmetni izraz tek pruža informacije o naravi predmetnih proizvoda i/ili usluga, a ne upućuje na njihovo podrijetlo.
This was the case with the term ‘medi', which was considered as merely providing information to the relevant public about the medical or therapeutic purpose of the goods or of their general reference to the medical field (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369, § 22). 
Takav je slučaj s pojmom „medi”, za koji se smatra da relevantnoj javnosti samo pruža informacije o medicinskoj ili terapijskoj svrsi proizvoda ili njihovom općem upućivanju na područje medicine (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369, § 22).
An objection under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR would also apply in those cases where the lexical structure employed, although not correct from a grammatical point of view, can be considered to be common in advertising language and in the commercial context at issue. 
Prigovor na temelju članka 7. stavka 1. točke (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a primjenjuje se i u slučajevima kad se upotrijebljena leksička struktura, iako gramatički netočna, može smatrati uobičajenom u oglašivačkom i komercijalnom kontekstu.
This was the case for the combination ‘ECO PRO', in which the laudatory element PRO is placed after the descriptive element ECO and which would be perceived by the relevant public as an indication that the designated goods are intended for ‘ecological professionals' or are ‘ecological supporting' (25/04/2013, T145/12, Eco Pro, EU:T:2013:220, § 29-32). 
To je bio slučaj s kombinacijom „ECO PRO”, u kojoj pohvalni element PRO dolazi nakon opisnog elementa ECO, pri čemu bi relevantna javnost označene proizvode doživjela kao namijenjene „stručnjacima za ekologiju” ili kao one koji „podupiru ekologiju” (25/04/2013, T145/12, Eco Pro, EU:T:2013:220, § 29-32).
2 Word Elements 
Verbalni elementi
Words are non-distinctive or cannot confer distinctiveness on a composite sign if they are so frequently used that they have lost any capacity to distinguish goods and services. 
Riječi nemaju razlikovni karakter niti mogu dati razlikovni karakter složenom znaku ako se toliko često upotrebljavaju da nemaju mogućnost razlikovanja proizvoda i usluga.
The following terms, alone or in combination with other unregistrable elements, fall foul of this provision. 
Pojmovi u nastavku, bilo samostalno bilo u kombinaciji s drugim elementima koji se ne mogu registrirati, u sukobu su s tom odredbom.
Terms merely denoting a particular positive or appealing quality or function of the goods and services should be refused if applied for either alone or in combination with descriptive terms: 
Pojmove koji označavaju samo određenu pozitivnu ili privlačnu karakteristiku ili funkciju proizvoda i usluga treba odbiti ako se upotrebljavaju samostalno ili u kombinaciji s opisnim pojmovima:
ECO as denoting ‘ecological' (24/04/2012, T328/11, EcoPerfect, EU:T:2012:197, § 25; 15/01/2013, T625/11, EcoDoor, EU:T:2013:14, § 21); 
ECO koji označava „ekološki” (24/04/2012, T328/11, EcoPerfect, EU:T:2012:197, § 25; 15/01/2013, T625/11, EcoDoor, EU:T:2013:14, § 21);
FLEX and FLEXI as referring to ‘flexible' (13/06/2014, T352/12, Flexi, EU:T:2014:519, § 20-21); 
FLEX i FLEXI koji se odnose na „fleksibilan” (13/06/2014, T352/12,Flexi, EU:T:2014:519,§ 20-21);
GREEN as being ‘environmentally friendly' (27/02/2015, T106/14, Greenworld, EU:T:2015:123, § 24); 
GREEN kao „ekološki prihvatljiv” (27/02/2015, T106/14, Greenworld, EU:T:2015:123, § 24);
MEDI as referring to ‘medical' (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369); 
MEDI koji se odnosi na „medicinski” (12/07/2012, T470/09, Medi, EU:T:2012:369);
MULTI as referring to ‘much, many, more than one' (17/11/2005, R 904/20042, MULTI); 
MULTI koji se odnosi na „puno, mnogo, više od jednog” (17/11/2005, R 904/20042, MULTI);
MINI as denoting ‘very small' or ‘tiny' (17/12/1999, R 62/19992, MINIRISC); 
MINI koji označava nešto „jako malo” ili „sitno” (17/12/1999, R 62/19992, MINIRISC);
MEGA as denoting ‘big' (28/04/2015, T137/13, MEGARAIL, EU:T:2015:232, § 38); 
MEGA kao „velik” (28/04/2015, T137/13,MEGARAIL, EU:T:2015:232, § 38);
Premium/PREMIUM as referring to ‘best quality' (22/05/2012, T60/11, Suisse Premium, EU:T:2012:252, § 46-49, 56, 58; 17/01/2013, T582/11 & T583/11, Premium XL / Premium L, EU:T:2013:24, § 26); 
Premium/PREMIUM koji se odnosi na „najbolju kvalitetu” (22/05/2012, T60/11, Suisse Premium, EU:T:2012:252, § 46-49, 56, 58; 17/01/2013, T582/11&T583/11, Premium XL/ Premium L, EU:T:2013:24, § 26);
PLUS as denoting ‘additional, extra, of superior quality, excellent of its kind'. 
PLUS koji označava „dodatno, posebno, vrhunske kvalitete, izvrsno”.
SUPER for highlighting the ‘positive qualities of the goods or services' (judgments of 19/05/2010, T464/08, Superleggera, EU:T:2010:212, § 23-30; 20/11/2002, T79/01 & T86/01, Kit Pro / Kit Super Pro, EU:T:2002:279, § 26); 
SUPER za isticanje „pozitivnih kvaliteta proizvoda i usluga” (presude od 19/05/2010, T464/08, Superleggera, EU:T:2010:212, § 23-30; 20/11/2002, T79/01 &T86/01,Kit Pro / Kit Super Pro, EU:T:2002:279, § 26);
ULTRA as denoting ‘extremely' (09/12/2002, R 333/20021, ULTRAFLEX); 
ULTRA koji znači „iznimno” (09/12/2002, R 333/20021, ULTRAFLEX);
[2: Amended on 23/06/2010.] 
[2: Izmijenjeno 23. 6. 2010.]
UNIVERSAL as referring to goods that are ‘fit for general or universal use' (02/05/2012, T435/11, UniversalPHOLED, EU:T:2012:210, § 22, 28). 
UNIVERSAL koji se odnosi na proizvode koji su „prigodni za opću ili univerzalnu uporabu” (02/05/2012, T435/11, UniversalPHOLED, EU:T:2012:210, § 22, 28).
Top level domain endings, such as ‘.com', only indicate the place where information can be found on the internet and thus cannot render a descriptive or otherwise objectionable mark registrable. 
Završetak vršne domene, na primjer„.com”, samo označava na kojem mjestu na internetu možete doći do informacija, te stoga opisan ili neprihvatljiv žig ne može učiniti prihvatljivim za registraciju.
Therefore, www.books.com is as objectionable for printed matter as the term ‘books' alone. 
Prema tome, www.books.com neprihvatljiv je za tiskovine jednako kao i samostalni izraz „knjige”.
This was confirmed by the General Court in its judgment of 21/11/2012, T338/11, Photos.com, EU:T:2012:614, § 22, where it was stated that the element ‘.com' is a technical and generic element, the use of which is required in the normal structure of the address of a commercial internet site. 
Opći sud potvrdio je navedeno u svojoj presudi od 21/11/2012, T338/11, Photos.com, EU:T:2012:614, § 22, u kojoj navodi da je element „.com” tehnički i generički element čija je uporaba nužna u uobičajenoj strukturi adrese komercijalnih internetskih stranica.
Furthermore, it may also indicate that the goods and services covered by the trade mark application can be obtained or viewed online, or are internet related. 
Osim toga, taj element može upućivati i na mogućnost da se proizvode i usluge obuhvaćene prijavljenim žigom naruči ili pogleda na internetu ili da su ti proizvodi povezani s internetom.
Accordingly, the element in question must also be considered to be devoid of distinctive character in respect of the goods or services concerned. 
Prema tome, predmetni element treba tumačiti kao element koji nema razlikovni karakter za predmetne proizvode ili usluge.
Abbreviations of the legal form of a company such as Ltd., GmbH, etc. cannot add to the distinctiveness of a sign. 
Kratice pravnog oblika društva kao što su Ltd. (d.o.o.), GmbH (d.o.o.), itd. ne mogu pridonijeti razlikovnom karakteru znaka.
Names of individual persons are distinctive, irrespective of the frequency of the name and even in the case of the most common surnames, such as Jones or García (16/09/2004, C404/02, Nichols, EU:C:2004:538, § 26, 30), and the names of prominent persons (including heads of state). 
Imena pojedinaca razlikovna su neovisno o učestalosti imena i čak i u slučaju najučestalijih prezimena kao što su Jones ili García (16/09/2004, C404/02, Nichols, EU:C:2004:538, § 26, 30) te imena istaknutih pojedinaca (uključujući državne čelnike).
However, an objection will be raised if the name can also be perceived as a non-distinctive term in relation to the goods and services (e.g. ‘Baker' for pastry products). 
Međutim, prigovor će se podnijeti ako se ime može smatrati i nerazlikovnim pojmom u pogledu proizvoda i usluga (npr. Baker (engl. pekar) za pekarske proizvode).
3 Titles of Books 
Naslovi knjiga
Trade marks consisting solely of a famous story or book title may be non-distinctive under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR in relation to goods and services that could have that story as their subject matter. 
Žigovi u čijem se nazivu pojavljuje samo poznata priča ili naslov knjige mogu imati nerazlikovni karakter na temelju članka 7. stavka 1. točke (b) u pogledu proizvoda i usluga s temom predmetne priče.
The reason for this is that certain stories (or their titles) have been established for so long and become so well known that they have ‘entered into the language' and are incapable of being ascribed any meaning other than that of a particular story. 
Razlog tome je što su određene priče (ili njihovi naslovi) postale toliko uvriježene i poznate da su „ušle u jezik” i stoga im se ne može pripisati nikakvo drugo značenje osim onoga predmetne priče.
For example, ‘Peter Pan', ‘Cinderella' and ‘The Iliad' are perfectly capable of being distinctive trade marks for paint, clothing or pencils. 
Na primjer „Petar Pan”, „Pepeljuga” ili „Ilijada” mogu biti razlikovni žigovi za boju, odjeću ili olovke.
However, they are incapable of performing a distinctive role in relation to books or films, for example, because consumers will simply think that these goods refer to the story of Peter Pan or Cinderella, this being the only meaning of the terms concerned. 
Međutim, oni ne mogu imati razlikovnu ulogu u pogledu, na primjer, knjiga ili filmova, zato što će potrošači jednostavno pomisliti da se ti proizvodi odnose na priču o Petru Panu ili Pepeljugi jer je to jedino značenje predmetnih pojmova.
Objections should only be raised in such cases where the title in question is famous enough to be truly well known to the relevant consumer and where the mark can be perceived in the context of the goods/services as primarily signifying a famous story or book title. 
Prigovore treba uputiti samo onda kada je predmetni naslov popularan toliko da je relevantnom potrošaču uistinu dobro poznat i kada se žig može tumačiti u kontekstu proizvoda/usluga kao da prije svega ukazuje na poznatu priču ili naslov knjige.
A finding of non-distinctiveness in this regard will be more likely where it can be shown that a large number of published versions of the story have appeared and/or where there have been numerous television, theatre and film adaptations reaching a wide audience, in particular when a work has passed into the public domain once copyright protection has expired. 
Izostanak razlikovnog karaktera izgledniji je kada se može dokazati velik broj objavljenih verzija priče ili brojne televizijske, kazališne i filmske adaptacije koje dopiru do široke publike, posebno kad je djelo postalo javno dobro nakon isteka zaštite autorskih prava.
In cases where copyright is still running, the Office will presume good faith and register the mark (which can later be the subject of a cancellation action if the applicant was not entitled to file the EUTM application). 
U slučajevima kad autorska prava i dalje vrijede Ured će pretpostaviti dobru vjeru i registrirati žig (koji poslije može biti predmet postupka za brisanje ako podnositelj prijave nije imao pravo podnijeti prijavu žiga EU-a).
Depending on the nature of the mark in question, an objection may be taken in relation to printed matter, films, recordings, plays and shows (this is not an exhaustive list). 
Ovisno o naravi predmetnog žiga, prigovor se može uputiti u pogledu tiskovina, filmova, snimki, predstava i priredaba (ovaj popis nije konačan).
4 Single Letters 
Pojedinačna slova
[3: This part deals with single letters under Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR. 
[3: Ovaj je dio posvećen pojedinačnim slovima u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 1. točke (b) Uredbe o žigu EU-a.
For single letters under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR, see the Guidelines, Part B, Examination, Section 4, Absolute Grounds for Refusal, Chapter 4, Descriptive Trade Marks (Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR), paragraph 2.8).] 
Pojedinosti o pojedinačnim slovima u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 1. točkom (c) Uredbe o žigu EU-a potražite u Smjernicama, dio B, Ispitivanje, odjeljak 4., Apsolutni razlozi za odbijanje, poglavlje 4., Opisni žigovi (članak 7. stavak 1. točka (c) Uredbe o žigu EU-a, odlomak 2.8.).]
4.1 General considerations 
Opća razmatranja