natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court found that the condition of ‘genuine use' may be fulfilled where an EU figurative mark is used only in conjunction with an EU word mark that is superimposed over it, and the combination of those two marks is, furthermore, itself registered as a European Union trade mark, to the extent that the differences between the form in which the trade mark is used and that in which it was registered do not change the distinctive character of the trade mark as registered. 
2. Sud je smatrao da uvjet „stvarne uporabe” može biti ispunjen ako se figurativni žig EU-a upotrebljava samo u kombinaciji s verbalnim žigom EU-a koji se nalazi iznad njega, a kombinacija je osim toga sama po sebi registrirana kao žig Europske unije, ako se razlikama između oblika u kojem se taj žig upotrebljava i oblika u kojem je registriran ne mijenja razlikovni karakter tog žiga kako je registriran.
Specsavers commenced proceedings for trade mark infringement and passing off on the basis of the earlier EUTM SPECSAVERS (word mark), as well as the figurative signs , and , against ASDA, a supermarket chain, which relaunched its optical business and targeted Specsavers in its marketing campaign. 
Grupacija Specsavers pokrenula je postupak zbog povrede žiga i zavaravajućeg označivanja na temelju ranijeg žiga EU-a SPECSAVERS (verbalni žig) i figurativnih žigova i protiv lanca supermarketa ASDA koji je ponovno pokrenuo svoje poslovanje u sektoru optike te pokrenuo reklamnu kampanju koja je bila usmjerena na Specsavers.
Specsavers used its black and white registrations in colour and acquired reputation in the UK for the colour green, using its sign as follows: . 
Gurpacija Specsavers upotrebljavala je svoje crno-bijele registracije u boji i stekao ugled u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini za zelenu boju, upotrebljavajući svoj znak kako slijedi: .
ASDA also acquired reputation in the UK for another shade of green in its supermarket business and applied it to the optical business: . 
Lanac ASDA je također stekao ugled u Ujedinjenoj Kraljevini za drugu nijansu zelene boje u sektoru supermarketa i primijenio je na poslovanje u sektoru optike: .
The Court found that the use of with the superimposed word sign may be considered genuine use of the wordless logo mark to the extent that the wordless logo mark as registered always refers in that form to the goods of the Specsavers group (to be determined by the referring court) (para. 24). 
Sud je isto tako smatrao da se uporaba s verbalnim žigom koji se nalazi iznad njega može smatrati stvarnom uporabom žiga s logotipom bez natpisa ako taj žig s logotipom bez natpisa u obliku u kojem je registriran uvijek upućuje na proizvode grupacije Specsavers (utvrdit će sud koji je uputio zahtjev) (t. 24.).
The Board of Appeal regarded the presentation of the two words as the use of two separate marks, since the evidence submitted by the opponent showed that one of them was an old brand of the opponent with its own identity and was present on the market with a number of accompanying signs, as is common practice in the labelling of the specific products (wine). 
Žalbeno vijeće smatralo je prikaz dviju riječi uporabom dvaju odvojenih žigova jer su dokazi koje je podnio podnositelj prigovora pokazali da je jedan od njih bila stara robna marka podnositelja prigovora s vlastitim identitetom i da je taj žig bio zastupljen na tržištu s mnogobrojnim pratećim znakovima, što je uobičajena praksa u etiketiranju određenih proizvoda (vino).
‘“DUBOIS” and “MINUTO” are separate marks that are affixed together in the concrete product, as is common practice in the labelling of wine products (name of the winery and name of the product). 
„DUBOIS” i „MINUTO” odvojeni su žigovi koji zajedno označavaju konkretan proizvod, što je uobičajena praksa u etiketiranju vinskih proizvoda (ime vinarije i naziv proizvoda).
As regards Spanish brands, see for example “TORRES” - “Sangre de Toro”, “TORRES” - “Acqua d'Or”. 
U pogledu španjolskih marki pogledajte na primjer „TORRES” - „Sangre de Toro”, „TORRES” - „Acqua d'Or”.
When asking for “MINUTO” wine, the relevant consumer will be aware that such wine is included within the line of products “DUBOIS”, however, “MINUTO” will be perceived as a trade mark of its own, even if it may appear next to the sign ”DUBOIS” in the invoices, brochures and/or product labels' (para. 18). 
Kada se relevantni potrošač zanima za vino „MINUTO”, on zna da je to vino dio proizvodne linije „DUBOIS”, međutim, „MINUTO” se doživljava kao žig sam za sebe, čak i ako se na računima, u brošurama i/ili etiketama proizvoda pojavljuje pored znaka „DUBOIS” (t. 18.).
The General Court confirmed that the use of the mark Coloris with additional word elements such as ‘global coloring concept' or ‘gcc' did not alter its distinctive character because the additional elements were merely used together with the mark Coloris and positioned below it and were of such a size that they were not predominant in the mark. 
Opći sud potvrdio je da uporaba žiga „Coloris” s dodatnim verbalnim elementima, kao na primjer „global coloring concept” ili „gcc” nije promijenila razlikovni karakter žiga, zbog toga što su dodatni elementi samo upotrijebljeni zajedno sa žigom „Coloris” i smješteni ispod njega, pri čemu njihova veličina nije dominirala u predmetnom žigu.
The same finding applies with even greater force to the additional words (global coloring concept) as ‘they are words with a general meaning. 
Isti zaključak primjenjuje se tim više na dodatne riječi (global coloring concept), zbog toga što su to „riječi općeg značenja”.
Furthermore, the word “coloring” refers to the goods concerned and, consequently, has a certain descriptive character' (para. 31). 
Nadalje, riječ „coloring” odnosi se na predmetne proizvode i prema tome ima određeni opisni karakter (t. 31.).
The Court indicated that ‘the fact that, in that newspaper article, the names of the funds are composed of the term “halder”, to which a number in Roman numerals has been added, is not such as to call into question the conclusion on use of the mark, since, because of their brevity, their weak distinctive character and their ancillary position, those additions do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered' (para. 58). 
Sud je naveo da „činjenica da se u tom novinskom članku imena fondova sastoje od izraza „halder” kojem je dodan rimski broj nije takav da dovede u pitanje zaključak o uporabi žiga, zato što ti dodatci, zbog svoje kratkoće, slabog razlikovnog karaktera i sporednog položaja, ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga u obliku u kojem je registriran” (t. 58.).
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; confirmed 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI 
09/07/2013, R 1190/20114, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI; potvrđeno 30/06/2015, T489/13, VIÑA ALBERDI / VILLA ALBERTI
The figurative signs reproduced in the evidence of use contain the distinctive elements of the earlier mark and those elements are clearly visible on the labels. 
Figurativni znakovi reproducirani u dokazu o uporabi sadržavaju razlikovne elemente ranijeg žiga, a ti su elementi jasno vidljivi na etiketama.
The inversion of the figurative and word elements of the sign and the additional indication of the respective appellation of origin (Soave, Soave Superiore and Chianti) do not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark, which appears reproduced in the sign with all its distinctive elements. 
Preokretanje figurativnih i verbalnih elemenata znaka i dodatne naznake odgovarajuće oznake podrijetla (Soave, Soave Superiore i Chianti) ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga čija se reprodukcija pojavljuje u znaku sa svim njegovim razlikovnim elementima.
Consumers of wines are particularly interested in knowing the precise geographical origin of these products; however, the addition of this information about the geographical origin of the goods is not capable of altering the distinctive character of a trade mark in its essential function of identifying a particular commercial origin (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19). 
Potrošači vina posebno su zainteresirani za informaciju o točnom zemljopisnom podrijetlu tih proizvoda; međutim, dodavanje takvih informacija o zemljopisnom podrijetlu proizvoda ne može promijeniti razlikovni karakter žiga pri ispunjavanju svoje osnovne funkcije utvrđivanja određenog komercijalnog podrijetla (08/12/2005, T29/04, Cristal Castellblanch, EU:T:2005:438, § 19).
The Court stated that the term ‘line', synonymous with the German word ‘Linie', is commonly used in advertising and business in relation to a product line. 
Sud je utvrdio da se engleski izraz „line” (linija), istoznačan njemačkom izrazu „Linie”, često upotrebljava u oglašavanju i poslovanju kada je riječ o proizvodnim linijama.
It is likely to be perceived automatically as an additional element by the average consumer, particularly in Germany. 
Prosječni potrošač vjerojatno će ga automatski doživjeti kao dodatni element, posebno u Njemačkoj.
The Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the term ‘line' did not alter the distinctive character of the disputed mark and that use of this trade mark in combination with this term was a use of that mark (paras 26-27). 
Sud se složio sa žalbenim vijećem da izraz „line” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter osporavanog žiga te da se uporaba tog žiga u kombinaciji s tim izrazom može smatrati uporabom tog žiga (t. 26. - 27.).
AINHOA AINHOA in combination with ‘BIO', ‘LUXE', ‘MINERAL PASSION', ‘SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE' or 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669 
AINHOA AINHOA u kombinaciji s „BIO”, „LUXE”, „MINERAL PASSION”, „SPA WORLD CHOCOLATE” ili 23/09/2015, T426/13, EU:T:2015:669
The figurative element consists of a square representing the sky, with clouds concentrated in the lower part of the square. 
Figurativni element sastoji se od kvadrata koji predstavlja nebo, s oblacima smještenima u donjem dijelu kvadrata.
This element has no obvious connection with the goods in question, and is not original. 
Taj element nema očitu vezu s predmetnim proizvodima i nije izvorni element.
Therefore, and taking into account its size and accessory position, it does not alter the overall impression produced by the mark at issue. 
Dakle, uzimajući u obzir i njegovu veličinu i sporedni položaj, on ne mijenja ukupni dojam stvoren predmetnim žigom.
The use of the figurative element must be regarded as an acceptable variation of the contested mark. 
Uporaba figurativnog elementa mora se smatrati prihvatljivom varijantom osporavanog žiga.
Furthermore, the elements added, such as, ‘bio', ‘luxe', ‘mineral passion' or ‘spa world chocolate', are descriptive of the characteristics of the goods. 
Nadalje, dodani elementi, kao što su „bio”, „luxe”, „mineral passion” ili „spa world chocolate” opisuju svojstva proizvoda.
The element ‘bio' may easily be perceived as an abbreviation of the term ‘biological' and refers to the origin or composition of the goods concerned. 
Element „bio” može se lako shvatiti kao kratica pojma „biološki” i odnosi se na podrijetlo ili sastav predmetnih proizvoda.
The term ‘mineral' describes the components of the goods in question as minerals are commonly used in cosmetics. 
Izraz „mineral” opisuje sastavnice predmetnih proizvoda jer se minerali često upotrebljavaju u kozmetici.
In addition, the word ‘spa' has a particular meaning with regard to health and wellness establishments. 
Osim toga, riječ „spa” ima posebno značenje u odnosu na zdravstvene centre za opuštanje i njegu tijela.
Finally, the word ‘luxe' is intended to describe the range of goods in question. 
Konačno, svrha riječi „luxe” jest opisati raspon predmetnih proizvoda.
Consequently, such additional elements do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (paras 30-32). 
Slijedom toga, takvi dodatni elementi ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 30. - 32.).
The use of the earlier mark ‘PELASPAN-PAC' without the hyphen connecting the elements ‘PELASPAN' and ‘PAC' does not alter the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered and therefore counts for the genuine use assessment. 
Uporaba ranijeg žiga „PELASPAN-PAC” bez spojnice koja spaja elemente „PELASPAN” i „PAC” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga kako je registriran te se stoga smatra važnom za procjenu stvarne uporabe.
‘In the case in hand, and after an examination of the proof submitted, which focuses essentially on the Spanish market, the Board is of the opinion that use of the “TENTATION” registered trade mark through use of the “TENTATIONS” sign does not alter the distinctive character of the original registered trade mark. 
„U ovom slučaju i nakon ispitivanja podnesenog dokaza, koji se uglavnom odnosi na španjolsko tržište, vijeće smatra da uporaba registriranog žiga „TENTATION” kroz uporabu znaka „TENTATIONS” ne mijenja razlikovni karakter izvornog registriranog žiga.
Specifically, the mere addition of the letter “S” to the end of the trade mark does not substantially alter the visual appearance or pronunciation of the registered trade mark and does not create a different conceptual impression on the Spanish market either. 
Naime, samo dodavanje slova ,S' na kraju žiga ne mijenja bitno vizualni izgled ili izgovor registriranog žiga niti na španjolskom tržištu stvara drugačiji konceptualni dojam.
The trade mark in question will be perceived merely as being in its plural form as opposed to its singular form. 
Predmetni žig doživljava se samo kao oblik u množini umjesto u jednini.
Therefore, said change does not alter the distinctive character of the sign' (para. 17). 
Prema tome, ta izmjena ne mijenja razlikovni karakter znaka” (t. 17.).
‘… these signs are not, as the applicant seems to suggest, significant alterations of the distinctive character of the earlier mark as registered' (para. 24). 
„[...] ti znakovi ne predstavljaju značajne izmjene razlikovnog karaktera ranije registriranog žiga, što podnositelj prijave nastoji dokazati” (t. 24.).
‘… whereas the German word “Feriendorf”, meaning “holiday village”, could be perceived as descriptive of the relevant [hotel] services, the same was not true for the word element “panno[n]ia”' (para. 30). 
„[...] iako se njemačka riječ „Feriendorf”, što znači „turističko naselje”, može smatrati opisnom za relevantne [hotelske] usluge, isto ne vrijedi za verbalni element „panno[n]ia” (t. 30.).
Consequently, the addition of the word ‘panno[n]ia' alters the distinctive character of the mark. 
Slijedom toga, dodavanje riječi „panno[n]ia” mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga.
‘It cannot be considered … that the use of CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE constitutes use of the mark CAPTAIN in a form which does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as registered, since the two signs appear essentially different' (para. 20). 
„CAPTAIN BIRDS EYE [...] nije moguće tumačiti kao uporabu žiga CAPTAIN u obliku koji ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga kako je registriran zbog toga što se ta dva znaka doimaju bitno različitima” (t. 20.).
The addition of the semi-circular graphical element does not change the overall impression of the sign (para. 49). 
Dodavanje polukružnog grafičkog elementa ne mijenja ukupni dojam znaka (t. 49.).
The figurative elements are only decorative or even negligible and do not alter the distinctive character of the mark (para. 43). 
Figurativni elementi samo su dekorativni ili čak zanemarivi i ne mijenjaju razlikovni karakter žiga (t. 43.).
‘[T]his material shows that the respondent's products also contain other elements, in particular a Japanese character within a small circle, which is depicted either above or below the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 19). 
„[O]vaj materijal pokazuje da proizvodi tuženika sadržavaju i neke druge elemente, konkretno japanski znak u malom krugu koji je prikazan ispod ili iznad riječi ,BIONSEN'” (t. 19.).
‘However, in the present case, the combination of the stylised form of the word “BIONSEN” and the Japanese character, independently of whether it is above or under the word “BIONSEN”, constitutes at the most use which differs from the form in which it was registered only in negligible elements. 
„Ipak, u ovom slučaju, kombinacija stiliziranog oblika riječi ,BIONSEN' i japanskog znaka, neovisno o tome nalazi li se on iznad ili ispod riječi ,BIONSEN', može se smatrati samo uporabom koja se od oblika u kojemu je žig registriran razlikuje samo u zanemarivim elementima.
The word “BIONSEN” as used is merely a slight and banal stylisation of the word ‘BIONSEN'. 
Riječ ,BIONSEN', kako se upotrebljava, predstavlja samo beznačajnu i običnu stilizaciju riječi ,BIONSEN'.
As to the addition of the figurative element in the form of a circular element with a Japanese character, this will hardly be noticed by the average consumer due to its relatively small size and position, either under or on the right side above the word “BIONSEN”' (para. 23). 
Kada je riječ o dodavanju figurativnog elementa u obliku kružnog elementa s japanskim znakom, teško da će ga prosječni potrošač primijetiti zbog njegove relativno male veličine i položaja, ispod ili na desnoj strani iznad riječi ,BIONSEN'” (t. 23.).
The General Court considered that both the registered form of the earlier mark and the form used included the word ‘BUS' and the figurative element of ‘three interlaced triangles'. 
Opći sud smatrao je da registrirani oblik ranijeg žiga i upotrijebljeni oblik uključuju riječ „BUS” i figurativni element „tri isprepletena trokuta”.
The presentation of the elements is not particularly original or unusual in either form. 
Prikaz tih elemenata ni u jednom obliku nije osobito originalan ili neobičan.
The variation in them does not affect the distinctive character of the trade mark. 
Različite varijante elemenata ne utječu na razlikovni karakter žiga.
As regards the omission of ‘Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e. 
U pogledu izostavljanja „Betreuungsverbund für Unternehmer und Selbständige e.
V.', the latter was ‘a string of words, written in small characters and occupying a secondary position, at the bottom of the sign. 
V.”, potonji se element sastojao od „niza riječi napisanih malim slovima koja zauzimaju sekundarni položaj na dnu znaka.
Its meaning (Association for the assistance of businessmen and the self-employed, registered association) refers to the services in question. 
Njegovo značenje (Udruženje za pomoć poduzetnicima i samozaposlenima, registrirano udruženje) odnosi se na predmetne usluge.
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; confirmed 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484 
29/09/2011, T415/09, Fishbone, EU:T:2011:550; potvrđeno 18/07/2013, C621/11 P, Fishbone, EU:C:2013:484
The Board considered that although in some pieces of evidence the earlier mark did not include the word ‘beachwear', this did not alter the distinctiveness of the earlier mark because it was plainly descriptive of the nature of the goods (t-shirts, beachwear). 
Vijeće je smatralo da, iako u nekim dokazima raniji žig nije uključivao riječ „beachwear”, to ne mijenja razlikovni karakter ranijeg žiga zbog toga što ona očito opisuje narav proizvoda (majice kratkih rukava, odjeća za plažu).
The General Court held: ‘In the present case, the earlier mark is a composite mark, representing a ship's wheel, that is to say, a sign with a rounded shape. 
Opći sud smatrao je sljedeće: „Raniji žig u ovom je slučaju složeni žig koji predstavlja kormilo, odnosno riječ je o znaku zaobljenog oblika.
In the centre of the sign there is a fish skeleton, at the top of which is written the term “fishbone”, and at the bottom the term “beachwear”. 
U sredini znaka nalazi se kostur ribe na čijem je vrhu napisan izraz ,fishbone', a na dnu izraz ,beachwear'.
The term “beachwear”, which means “beach clothing” in English, is descriptive of the nature of the goods covered by the earlier mark [emphasis added]. 
Izraz ,beachwear', koji na engleskom jeziku znači ,odjeća za plažu', opisuje narav proizvoda obuhvaćenih ranijim žigom [isticanje naknadno dodano].
That descriptive character is obvious in the case of the “beach clothing” covered by the earlier mark, but also in the case of “t-shirts”, for which the term “beachwear” will immediately be perceived as meaning that it refers to a t-shirt to be worn in casual situations, for example, on the beach in summer. 
Taj je opisni karakter očigledan u slučaju elementa ,odjeća za plažu' koji je obuhvaćen ranijim žigom, ali i u slučaju elementa ,majica kratkih rukava' u kojem se izraz ,beachwear' odmah doživljava kao majica koja se nosi u ležernim situacijama, na primjer ljeti na plaži.
Consumers will thus understand that term as designating the type of goods and will not perceive it as an indication of their commercial origin. 
Prema tome, potrošači taj izraz razumiju kao vrstu proizvoda i ne percipiraju ga kao oznaku njegova komercijalnog podrijetla.
The fact that the term “beachwear” is written in a more fanciful font than that of the term “fishbone”, which is written in ordinary capital letters, cannot alter such an assessment. 
Činjenica da je izraz ,beachwear' pisan maštovitijom vrstom slova nego izraz ,fishbone', koji je pisan običnim velikim slovima, ne može promijeniti takvu procjenu.
Furthermore, … the font of the term “beachwear” cannot be regarded as uncommon, since it comprises printed lower-case characters. 
Osim toga, [...] vrsta slova izraza ,beachwear' ne može se smatrati nesvakidašnjom zbog toga što se on sastoji od malih pisanih slova.
As for the horizontal position of the term “beachwear” in the earlier mark, which runs in a perpendicular sense across the bottom of a ship's wheel, it is no more graphically incisive than that of the term “fishbone” which, also written horizontally, follows the rounded shape of that wheel' (paras 6263). 
Kada je riječ o vodoravnom položaju izraza ,beachwear' na ranijem žigu, koji se proteže okomito po dnu brodskog kormila, on nije grafički precizniji od izraza ,fishbone' koji, također pisan vodoravno, prati zaobljeni oblik tog kormila (t. 62.63.).
It is not considered that the absence of the word ‘de' affects the distinctive character of the trade mark. 
Ne smatra se da izostavljanje riječi „de” utječe na razlikovni karakter žiga.
The Court confirmed (para. 53) the finding of the Board that the ‘distinctiveness of the mark is largely dominated by the wording ‘LIDL MUSIC' and only marginally influenced by the figurative elements used to represent the letters and the small monogram underneath' (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19). 
Sud je potvrdio (t. 53.) zaključak žalbenog vijeća da „razlikovnošću ranijeg žiga znatno dominira formulacija ‚LIDL MUSIC' i samo je marginalno pod utjecajem figurativnih elemenata koji se upotrebljavaju za predstavljanje slova i malog monograma ispod” (21/03/2012, R 2379/20101, LIDL express (fig.)/LÍDL MUSIC (fig.) et al., para. 19.).
The omission of the transliteration of the term in Greek characters does not alter the distinctive character of the mark as the form used contains the term APALIA, which is distinctive and dominant. 
Izostavljanje transliteracije izraza pisanog grčkim slovima ne mijenja razlikovni karakter žiga zbog toga što upotrijebljeni oblik sadržava pojam APALIA koji je razlikovan i dominantan.
‘[T]he absence of the word element ‘TONY' in the first two marks significantly alters the distinctive character of the registered earlier mark ‘TONY HAWK'. 
„[I]zostavljanje verbalnog elementa ,TONY' u prva dva žiga značajno mijenja razlikovni karakter registriranog ranijeg žiga ,TONY HAWK'.
Therefore, these marks shall be perceived as separate marks and their use cannot be considered as the use of the word mark ‘TONY HAWK'. 
Prema tome, te žigove treba smatrati zasebnim žigovima, a njihova se uporaba ne može smatrati uporabom verbalnog žiga ,TONY HAWK'.”
(in Spain) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); appeal 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 did not refer to the Spanish trade marks) 
(u Španjolskoj) 03/02/2010, R 1625/20084 LT LIGHT-TECHNO / (FIGURATIVE); žalba 10/11/2011, T143/10, LT LighT-Thecno, EU:T:2011:652 nije se odnosila na španjolske žigove)
‘The earlier trade mark is registered as “SP LA SPOSA”. 
„Raniji žig registriran je kao ,SP LA SPOSA'.