natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission provides guidance, which serves as a document to clarify certain legal interpretations and to disseminate examples of good practices of implementation of the EU law to the Member States. 
Komisija daje smjernice koje državama članicama služe kao dokument kojim se pojašnjavaju određena pravna tumačenja i šire primjeri dobre prakse u pogledu provedbe zakonodavstva EU-a.
The issue of the reasonableness of costs is regularly discussed with Member States in various contexts: the latest event was the Error rate seminar that took place in June 2018 during which aspects of the reasonableness of costs and the use of Simplified Cost Options were discussed. 
O pitanju razumnosti troškova redovito se raspravlja s državama članicama u različitim kontekstima: posljednja aktivnost bio je seminar o stopama pogrešaka koji se održao u lipnju 2018., tijekom kojeg se razgovaralo o aspektima opravdanosti troškova i korištenju pojednostavnjenih mogućnosti financiranja.
Trainings may be organised upon Member States’ requests, and several trainings have already been organised concerning this topic. 
Izobrazbe se mogu organizirati na zahtjev država članica, a već je organizirano nekoliko izobrazbi povezanih s ovom temom.
It should also be noted, that the uptake of Simplified Cost Options is significantly increasing throughout the implementation of the Rural Development Programmes, which means that the assessment of the reasonableness of costs is used less frequently by the Member States. 
Treba napomenuti i da se primjena pojednostavnjenih mogućnosti financiranja znatno povećava tijekom provedbe programa ruralnog razvoja, što znači da države članice rjeđe koriste procjenu opravdanosti troškova.
Reply to paragraph 98, recommendation 3(b): The recommendation by ECA is considered as fully implemented. 
3 (b): Preporuka Europskog revizorskog suda smatra se u cijelosti provedenom.
Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 requires that in 2017 and 2019 the annual review meetings between the Commission and each Member State cover all programmes. 
1303/2013 zahtijeva se da se na godišnjim preglednim sastancima između Komisije i svake države članice za 2017. i 2019. obuhvate svi programi.
These review meetings shall take into account the progress reports on the implementation of the Partnership Agreement. 
Na tim se preglednim sastancima uzimaju u obzir izvješća o napretku u provedbi Sporazuma o partnerstvu.
Among others, this report shall set out information on the implementation of mechanisms to ensure coordination between the European Structural and Investment Funds and other Union and national funding instruments and with the European Investment Bank. 
Među ostalim, to izvješće sadržava informacije o provedbi mehanizama kojima se osigurava usklađenost između ESI fondova i drugih financijskih instrumenata Unije i nacionalnih financijskih instrumenata te usklađenost s financiranjem iz Europske investicijske banke.
These review meetings are additional means to ensure the complementarity and synergies between European Structural and Investment Funds programmes in a given Member State, and provides a basis to introduce improvements when necessary. 
Ti pregledni sastanci dodatna su sredstva za osiguranje komplementarnosti i sinergije među programima europskih strukturnih i investicijskih fondova u određenoj državi članici i pružaju osnovu za uvođenje poboljšanja kada je to potrebno.
Reply to paragraph 100, recommendation 4(b): The Commission remains of the position that it is not responsible for monitoring that feedback systems to improve upcoming trainings are in place. 
4 (b): Komisija ostaje pri stajalištu da nije odgovorna za praćenje jesu li uspostavljeni sustavi za prikupljanje povratnih informacija kako bi se poboljšale buduće izobrazbe.
As to reliable information on the quality and effectiveness of the knowledge-transfer and advisory services, Annex V of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2014 specifies the common evaluation questions (EQ) for rural development: EQ 1, referring to Focus Area 1A, reads: ‘To what extent have RDP interventions supported innovation, cooperation and the development of the knowledge base in rural areas?’This EQ shall be answered in the enhanced Annual Implementation Report submitted in 2019 and in theex-post evaluation. 
Kad je riječ o pouzdanim informacijama o kvaliteti i učinkovitosti uslugâ prijenosa znanja i savjetovanja, u Prilogu V. Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) br.
Reply to paragraph 102, recommendation 5: The Commission considers this recommendation as fully implemented. As regards the audits in the field of knowledge transfer and innovation that were not carried out in the practice were planned in the Multiannual Work Programme 2016-2019 for year n+2 i.e. for 2018-2019. 
5: Komisija preporuku smatra u cijelosti provedenom. Kad je riječ o revizijama u području prijenosa znanja i inovacija koje nisu provedene u praksi, planirane su u višegodišnjem programu rada za razdoblje 2016.–2019. za godinu n+2, odnosno za razdoblje 2018.–2019.
Following a new Central Risk Assessment carried out in 2017 their risk scoring was lower due to the lower expenditure and, given the available resources, it was decided to take on board other audits (with higher risk and more expenditure). 
Nakon nove Središnje procjene rizika, provedene 2017., njihove procjene rizika bile su niže zbog manjih rashoda, a s obzirom na raspoloživa sredstva odlučeno je da se prihvate i druge revizije (s većim rizikom i većim rashodima).
After the Special report, the risk profile of the audit field was increased. 
Nakon tematskog izvješća povećan je profil rizičnosti u području revizije.
As a consequence, DG AGRI selected and carried out 5 audits (in AT, DK, FR, IT, SE). 
Kao posljedica toga, GU AGRI odabrao je i proveo pet revizija (u Austriji, Danskoj, Francuskoj, Italiji i Švedskoj).
It should be understood that, due to expenditure being very low, even if an increase of the risk factor of the audit field in the risk analysis was done, the number of selected transactions is still limited. 
Treba imati na umu da je, s obzirom na vrlo male rashode, čak i ako je izvršeno povećanje faktora rizika područja revizije u analizi rizika, niz odabranih transakcija i dalje ograničen.
Moreover, in the new audit approach that DG AGRI is carrying out since July 2018, the focus is on the work of the Certification Body (CB) for all non-IACS measures, including the measures related to knowledge transfer and innovation. 
Štoviše, u novom pristupu reviziji koji GU AGRI provodi od srpnja 2018. naglasak je stavljen na rad certifikacijskog tijela za sve mjere izvan IAKS-a, uključujući mjere povezane s prijenosom znanja i inovacijama.
Whenever such a measure is in sample 1 of the CB it will also be selected by DG AGRI in its audit. 
Kad god je takva mjera u uzorku 1 certifikacijskog tijela, u svojoj će ga reviziji odabrati i GU AGRI. 8.10.2019.
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/231 EN Special report 13/2015: EU support to timber-producing countries under the FLEGT action plan Reply to paragraph 58, recommendation 1: This recommendation was partially accepted in 2015 by the Commission, as earmarking a budget for implementing the FLEGT Action Plan is only feasible for thematic programmes/budget lines. 
Službeni list Europske unije C 340/231 HR Tematsko izvješće br. 13/2015: „Potpora EU-a zemljama proizvođačima drvne sirovine u okviru Akcijskog plana za provedbu zakonodavstva, upravljanje i trgovinu u području šumarstva (Akcijskog plana za FLEGT)” Odgovor na odlomak 58. preporuku br. 1: Komisija je 2015. djelomično prihvatila ovu preporuku jer je izdvajanje proračuna za provedbu Akcijskog plana za FLEGT izvedivo samo za tematske programe/proračunske linije.
For the period 2014-2020, the Commission earmarked 145 million euro for implementing the FLEGT Action Plan under the Thematic Programme Budget Line and developed Annual Action Plans detailing what action areas of the FLEGT action plan were to be financed. 
Komisija je za razdoblje 2014.–2020. izdvojila 145 milijuna EUR za provedbu Akcijskog plana za FLEGT u okviru proračunske linije tematskog programa i izradila godišnje akcijske planove u kojima je detaljno utvrđeno koja će se područja djelovanja Akcijskog plana za FLEGT financirati.
Special report 16/2015: Improving the security of energy supply by developing the internal energy market: more efforts needed Reply to paragraph 117, recommendation 3: The Commission considers the recommendation is fully implemented through the extension of the regulatory framework and the setup of a platform. 
Tematsko izvješće br. 16/2015: „Povećanje sigurnosti opskrbe energijom razvojem unutarnjeg energetskog tržišta: nužni su dodatni napori” Odgovor na odlomak 117. preporuku br.
Reply to paragraph 123, recommendation 7 (b): The Commission had partially accepted the recommendation and took the requested action on the accepted elements. 
Odgovor na odlomak 123. preporuku br. 7 (b): Komisija je djelomično prihvatila preporuku i poduzela zatražene mjere u pogledu prihvaćenih elemenata.
Reply to paragraph 126, recommendation 9: The Commission had not accepted the recommendation. 
Odgovor na odlomak 126. preporuku br. 9: Komisija nije prihvatila ovu preporuku.
However, it took the actions considered necessary to address the underlying issues. 
No poduzela je mjere koje su se smatrale potrebnima radi rješavanja temeljnih pitanja.
Special report 17/2015: Commission’s support of youth action teams: redirection of ESF funding achieved, but insufficient focus on results Reply to paragraph 84, recommendation 2 (a): The Commission considers the recommendation is fully implemented. 
Tematsko izvješće br. 17/2015: „Potpora Komisije akcijskim timovima za mlade: ostvareno je preusmjeravanje sredstava ESF-a, ali uz nedovoljnu usredotočenost na rezultate” Odgovor na odlomak 84. preporuku br.
The Commission insists that the examination of opportunities to improve results, is an on-going, standard practice. 
Komisija inzistira da je ispitivanje mogućnosti za poboljšanje rezultata stalna i uobičajena praksa.
The Commission examines each reprogramming request, whether triggered by the need to incorporate new additional funds or not, primarily with a view of achieving better results, and discusses at length with the Member State. 
Komisija ispituje svaki zahtjev za reprogramiranje, bez obzira na to je li potaknut potrebom za uključivanjem novih dodatnih sredstava ili ne, prvenstveno radi postizanja boljih rezultata, i detaljno raspravlja s državom članicom.
So far, the Commission had not taken the initiative to propose new modifications as it would have been unnecessary and highly inefficient. 
Komisija do sada nije preuzela inicijativu i predložila nove izmjene jer bi bile nepotrebne i vrlo neučinkovite.
Reply to paragraph 84, recommendation 2 (b): The Commission considers the recommendation is fully implemented. 
2 (b): Komisija smatra da je ova preporuka u cijelosti provedena.
The Commission insists that such as assessment is carried out diligently and has always been standard practice. 
Komisija inzistira na tome da se procjena provodi marljivo i da je ona uvijek bila uobičajena praksa.
Reporting on every single detail of the assessment process, on elements that are required by the Regulations and have always been standard practice, is seen as unnecessary and inefficient, hence the absence of detailed information on the checklists. 
Izvješćivanje o svim pojedinostima postupka procjenjivanja, o elementima koji su propisani uredbama i koji su uvijek bili uobičajena praksa smatra se nepotrebnim i neu-činkovitim, zbog čega na kontrolnim popisima nedostaju detaljne informacije.
Reply to paragraph 84, recommendation 2 (c): The Commission insists that this recommendation is fully implemented to the degree that it remains relevant. 
2 (c): Komisija inzistira da je ova preporuka u cijelosti provedena u mjeri u kojoj ostaje relevantna.
This recommendation has lost relevance during the 2014-2020 as Annual Implementation Reports are no longer considered as the means of communicating detailed, but only summarised information. 
Ova je preporuka izgubila na važnosti tijekom razdoblja 2014.–2020. jer se godišnja izvješća o provedbi više ne smatraju načinom priopćavanja detaljnih, već samo sažetih informacija.
The Commission insists that sufficient, relevant information is transmitted through the Annual Implementation Reports and more detailed information is provided through other means of reporting (e.g. evaluation reports; technical meetings and monitoring committees – the discussions of which are reflected in minutes and notes to the file). 
Komisija naglašava da se u godišnjim izvješćima o provedbi prenose dovoljne, relevantne informacije, a da se detaljnije informacije osiguravaju drugim načinom izvješćivanja (npr. izvješća o evaluaciji, tehnički sastanci i odbori za praćenje – čije su rasprave zabilježene u zapisnicima i internim bilješkama).
The Commission insists that systematic plausibility and reliability checks are carried out as standard practice. 
Komisija naglašava da se sustavne provjere vjerodostojnosti i pouzdanosti provode kao uobičajena praksa.
Evidence exists on this being a standard practice (guidance documents from the evaluation unit and from the ESF coordination unit; checklists for accepting reports). 
Postoje dokazi da je to uobičajena praksa (smjernice iz jedinice za evaluaciju i iz koordinacijske jedinice ESF-a, kontrolni popisi za prihvaćanje izvješćâ).
Documenting every single check carried out, would be unnecessary and inefficient. 
Dokumentiranje svake provedene provjere bilo bi nepotrebno i neučinkovito.
The Commission will only be in the position to complete the respective monitoring at that time. 
Komisija će u tom trenutku samo moći dovršiti predmetno praćenje.
Reply to paragraph 77, recommendation 3 (a): The Commission considers this recommendation as implemented as the required action of advising the Member States to set up additional indicators was accomplished. 
Odgovor na odlomak 77. preporuku br. 3 (a): Komisija tu preporuku smatra provedenom jer je provedena potrebna mjera savjetovanja država članica da odrede dodatne pokazatelje.
The Commission monitors the implementation of the Rural Development Programmes through the set of common context, result and output indicators under the 2014-2020 Common Monitoring and Evaluation System. 
Komisija prati provedbu programâ ruralnog razvoja putem skupa zajedničkih pokazatelja konteksta, rezultata i ostvarenja u okviru Zajedničkog sustava praćenja i evaluacije 2014.–2020.
C 340/232 Official Journal of the European Union 8.10.2019 EN Evaluations are carried out by/on behalf of the Member States while the synthesis of these evaluations at EU level is done under the responsibility of the Commission services. 
C 340/232 Službeni list Europske unije 8.10.2019. HR Evaluacije provode države članice ili se one provode u njihovo ime, a sinteza tih evaluacija na razini EU-a obavlja se u nadležnosti službi Komisije.
The mandatory elements of the 2014-2020 Common Monitoring and Evaluation System, contained in the implementing act, include a list of the indicators to be used to monitor the performance of the policy. 
Obvezni elementi Zajedničkog sustava praćenja i evaluacije 2014.–2020., sadržani u provedbenom aktu, uključuju popis pokazatelja koji će se koristiti za praćenje uspješnosti politike.
Beyond these indicators, the Commission cannot do more but only to advise/encourage the Member States to set up the additional indicators. 
Osim ovih pokazatelja, Komisija može samo savjetovati/poticati države članice da utvrde dodatne pokazatelje.
The recommendation to ‘advise those Member States where Non-productive investments support is significant, to define specific result indicators for the Non-productive investments types most frequently funded’was fulfilled through the guidelines on the ‘Assessment of Rural Development Programmes results: How to prepare for reporting on evaluation in 2017’. 
Preporuka „da Komisija državama članicama sa znatnim udjelom potpore neproizvodnim ulaganjima treba pružiti savjete o utvrđivanju pokazateljâ rezultata za najčešće financirane vrste neproizvodnih ulaganja” ispunjena je utvrđivanjem „Smjernica o procjeni rezultata programâ ruralnog razvoja: kako se pripremiti za izvješćivanje o evaluaciji u 2017.”
The Commission cannot oblige the Member States to establish such additional indicators as it goes beyond the mandatory elements of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation System (CMES) framework for 2014-2020. 
Komisija ne može obvezati države članice da utvrde takve dodatne pokazatelje jer to prelazi obvezne elemente okvira Zajedničkog sustava praćenja i evaluacije (CMES) za razdoblje 2014.– 2020.
Reply to paragraph 81, recommendation 5 (b): The Assurance and Audit Directorate of DG AGRI will continue including ECA’s findings in its preparatory work for the Multiannual Work Programme (MAWP). 
5 (b): Uprava za osiguranje i reviziju GU-a AGRI nastavit će uključivati rezultate Europskog revizorskog suda u pripremni rad za Višegodišnji program rada (VPR).
Special report 23/2015: Water quality in the Danube river basin: progress in implementing the water framework directive but still some way to go Reply to paragraph 172, recommendation 1 (d): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Tematsko izvješće br. 23/2015: „Kakvoća vode u dunavskom slijevu: ostvaren je napredak u provedbi Okvirne direktive o vodama, ali potrebni su dodatni napori” Odgovor na odlomak 172. preporuku br.
Reply to paragraph 172, recommendation 1 (e): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 172. preporuku br. 1 (e): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 172, recommendation 1 (f): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 172. preporuku br. 1 (f): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 182, recommendation 2 (b): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 182. preporuku br. 2 (b): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 182, recommendation 2 (c): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 182. preporuku br. 2 (c): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 182, recommendation 2 (d): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 182. preporuku br. 2 (d): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 191, recommendation 3 (b): The Commission did not accept this recommendation. 
Odgovor na odlomak 191. preporuku br. 3 (b): Komisija nije prihvatila ovu preporuku.
Reply to paragraph 191, recommendation 3 (e): Further work is foreseen and this recommendation is expected to be fully implemented by the end of 2020. 
Odgovor na odlomak 191. preporuku br. 3 (e): Predviđen je daljnji rad i očekuje se da će ova preporuka u cijelosti biti provedena do kraja 2020.
Reply to paragraph 191, recommendation 3 (f): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 191. preporuku br. 3 (f): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Reply to paragraph 191, recommendation 3 (g): This recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Odgovor na odlomak 191. preporuku br. 3 (g): Ova preporuka upućena je državama članicama.
Special report 24/2015: Tackling intra-Community VAT fraud: More action needed Reply to paragraph 116, recommendation 6: The Commission did not accept this recommendation. 
24/2015: „Borba protiv prijevara unutar Zajednice u području PDV-a: potrebno je odlučnije djelovati” Odgovor na odlomak 116. preporuku br. 6: Komisija nije prihvatila ovu preporuku.
The recommendation has been overtaken by the Commission’s proposal, currently discussed by the Council, for a ‘definitive VAT system’, overhauling the current VAT system for intra-EU trade and including new rules on reporting obligations. 
Preporuku je zamijenio prijedlog Komisije, o kojem trenutačno raspravlja Vijeće, o „konačnom sustavu PDV-a”, kojim će se reformirati postojeći sustav PDV-a za trgovinu unutar EU-a te uključiti nova pravila o obvezama izvješćivanja.
Reply to paragraph 117, recommendation 7: The Commission did not accept this recommendation. 
Odgovor na odlomak 117. preporuku br.
The Commission proposal for ‘definitive VAT system’, currently discussed by the Council, foresees the abolition of the sectorial reverse charge (in relation to goods in a first phase) as it deals structurally with the root of the intra-EU fraud problem. 
Prijedlogom Komisije za „konačni sustav PDV-a”, o kojem Vijeće trenutačno raspravlja, predviđeno je ukidanje sektorskog obrnutog oporezivanja (u odnosu na robu u prvoj fazi) jer se strukturalno bavi uzrokom problema prijevara unutar EU-a.
Special report 25/2015: EU support for rural infrastructure: potential to achieve significantly greater value for money Reply to paragraph 101, recommendation 1(b): The Commission considers that the recommendation is fully implemented. 
Tematsko izvješće br. 25/2015: „Potpora EU-a ruralnoj infrastrukturi: moguće je ostvariti znatno veću vrijednost za uloženi novac” Odgovor na odlomak 101. preporuku br.
The platform for exchange of best practice – the European Network for Rural Development – is established and used by Member States as projects and best practices in implementation appear during the current programming period 2014-2020. 
Države članice uspostavljaju i koriste platformu za razmjenu najboljih praksi – Europsku mrežu za ruralni razvoj – jer se projekti i najbolje prakse u provedbi pojavljuju tijekom tekućeg programskog razdoblja 2014.–2020.
Further assessments as to potential deadweight can only be done on a case-by-case basis and during programme evaluation, for which the Commission has issued guidance. 
Daljnje procjene u pogledu mogućeg učinka mrtvog tereta mogu se provesti samo zasebno od slučaja do slučaja i tijekom evaluacije programa, za koju je Komisija izdala smjernice.
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/233 EN In addition, the Commission has, with the adoption of the rural development programmes for the current period 2014-2020, mitigated the risk of non-achievement of added value for the EU funds. 
8.10.2019. Službeni list Europske unije C 340/233 HR Osim toga, Komisija je donošenjem programâ ruralnog razvoja za tekuće razdoblje 2014.–2020. ublažila rizik od neostvarenja dodane vrijednosti za EU fondove.
Reply to paragraph 101, recommendation 1(d): The Commission considers this recommendation as partly implemented, as itsimplementation is on-going. 
Odgovor na odlomak 101. preporuku br. 1 (d): Komisija preporuku smatra djelomično provedenom s obzirom na to da je njezina provedba u tijeku.
Regular contacts are established between the different services of the Commission. 
Uspostavljeni su redoviti kontakti među različitim službama Komisije.
When rural development programmes are approved or amended, other services of the Commission are included in the process via formal Inter-Service Consultations and contributions are taken into account. 
Nakon odobrenja ili izmjena programâ ruralnog razvoja, druge službe Komisije uključuju se u postupak putem službenih savjetovanja između službi i u obzir se uzimaju doprinosi.
The enhanced Annual Implementation Reports for 2018, to be submitted in 2019 are supposed to provide more insights as to the effectiveness of arrangements for ensuring complementarity between EU funds. 
Proširena godišnja izvješća o provedbi za 2018., koja bi trebala biti dostavljena 2019., trebala bi pružiti bolji uvid u djelotvornost dogovora o osiguravanju komplementarnosti između fondova EU-a.
A revised guidance for these Annual Implementation Reports has been published in September 2018. 
Revidirane smjernice za ova godišnja izvješća o provedbi objavljene su u rujnu 2018.
Reply to paragraph 106, recommendation 2(b): The Commission considers this recommendation as fully implemented. 
2 (b): Komisija preporuku smatra u cijelosti provedenom.