natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Annexes 90 Annual nominal GDP growth rate 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 CZ EE CY LV LT HU MT PL SI SK BG RO HR Annual nominal growth rate (y) y≥ 5 % 5 % > y≥ 3 % y< 3 % Source: ECA, based on AMECO database. 
1995. 1994. CZ EE CY LV LT HU MT PL SI SK BG RO HR Godišnja nominalna stopa rasta (y) y ≥ 5% 5% > y ≥ 3% y < 3% Izvor: Sud, na temelju baze podataka AMECO-a.
Annexes 91 Compliance with the nominal and structural targets set in EDP recommendations and EDP deadline extensions Annex VI illustrates how the EDPs introduced for the Member States in the sample have evolved. 
Prilozi 91 Pridržavanje nominalnih i strukturnih ciljeva navedenih u preporukama u vezi s EDP-om i produljenih rokova za EDP U Prilogu VI. prikazan je razvoj EDP-ova koje su uvele države članice iz uzorka.
In each case the blue cells show the year of the EDP deadline, with blue arrows pointing to any extensions. 
Plave ćelije pokazuju godinu isteka roka EDP-a za pojedinu državu, a plave strelice upućuju na bilo kakva produljenja roka.
Other colours show whether the Member State complied (green) or not (red) with the targets set in the Council’s EDP recom‐ mendations for the relevant indicators (headline deficit, structural effort and, for recommendations issued after the ‘Six‐pack’ entered into force, the adjusted structural deficit and bottom‐up indicator). 
Ostale boje pokazuju je li država članica ostvarila (zelena) ili nije (crvena) ciljeve navedene u preporukama Vijeća u vezi s EDP-om za relevantne pokazatelje (ukupni deficit, strukturni napor te – za preporuke izdane nakon stupanja na snagu paketa sa šest mjera – prilagođeni strukturni deficit i pokazatelj „odozdo prema gore”).
The first number in a cell represents the target, and the second is the actual value achieved. 
Prva brojka u ćeliji predstavlja cilj, a druga ostvarenu vrijednost.
Finally, yellow cells indicate that no annual target was set for the year in question, black cells that the specific indicator was not applicable (not yet in force) and grey cells that, although the data were available, the Commission did not take them into account in its assessment of effective action. 
Konačno, žute ćelije upućuju na to da nije određen godišnji cilj za dotičnu godinu, crne da određeni pokazatelj nije bio primjenjiv (još nije stupio na snagu) i sive da Komisija nije uzela u obzir dostupne podatke u svojoj procjeni djelotvornosti poduzetih radnji.
Source: ECA, based on the Council’s EDP decisions and recommendations, Commission’s Article 126(3) reports and staff working documents underlying the assessments of SCPs, draft budgetary plans and the 4th, 6th and 7th reviews of the economic adjustment programme for Cyprus. 
Izvor: Sud, na temelju odluka i preporuka Vijeća u vezi s EDP-om, Komisijinih izvješća i radnih dokumenata iz članka 126. stavka 3. na kojima se temelji procjena Programa stabilnosti i konvergencije, nacrta proračunskih planova te 4., 6., i 7. pregleda programa gospodarske prilagodbe za Cipar.
Assess. of effective action (29.05.2013) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach nts → - 7,1 % > 1 % → 0,3 % > 1 % → 0,2 % nts → - 0,75 % nts → - 5,3 % > 1 % → 1,1 % > 1 % → 0,9 % nts → - 1,5 % nts → - 4,8 % > 1 % → 1,1 % > 1 % → 1,1 % nts → 1,5 % > - 3 % → - 3,9 % > 1 % → 1,4 % > 1 % → 1,3 % nts → 1,5 % > - 3 % → - 4,2 % 2014 DBP (15.11.2013) EDP deadline Headlinedeficit >-3,9%→-4,1%>-3,6%→-3,8% -2,8%→-3,7% MEETING THE TARGET NOT MEETING THE TARGET NO TARGET SET (nts) NOT APPLICABLE (n/a) DATA NOT AVAILABLE DATA AVAILABLE, BUT NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY COMMISSION EDP DEADLINE EXTENSION OF EDP DEADLINE EDP initiated on 06 April 2009 > 1 % > 1 % Annex VI 
2013. 2014. (29.5.2013.)
Annexes 94 GERMANY LEGEND: Assessment 2010 SP (31.03.2010) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach Assess. of effective action (15.06.2010) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2011 SP (07.06.2011) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2012 SP (30.05.2012) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach MEETING THE TARGET NOT MEETING THE TARGET NO TARGET SET (nts) NOT APPLICABLE (n/a) DATA NOT AVAILABLE DATA AVAILABLE, BUT NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY COMMISSION 2010 2011 EDP initiated on 30 November 2009 EDP DEADLINE 2012 2013 nts → - 5.7 % nts → - 1.7 % nts → - 5.7 % nts → 0.5 % nts → - 3.3 % nts → 0.0 % nts → - 5.7 % 0.5 % → 0.1 % nts → - 5.7 % 0.5 % → 0.0 % nts → - 2.0 % 0.5 % → 0.5 % nts → - 1.0 % 0.5 % → 1.1 % nts → 0.5 % → 0.1 % 0.5 % → nts → - 1.2 % 0.5 % → 0.6 % nts → - 0.9 % 0.5 % → 0.4 % >-3%→ 0.5 % → nts → >-3%→ 0.5 % → >-3%→ 0.5 % → > - 3 % → - 0.7 % 0.5 % → 0.1 % EDP abrogated on 22 June 2012 Annex VI 
2011. 2012. (7.6.2011.) EDP pokrenut 30. studenoga 2009. g.
Annexes 96 ITALY Assessment 2010 SP (31.03.2010) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach Assess. of effective action (15.06.2010) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2011 SP (07.06.2011) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2012 SP (30.05.2012) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2013 SP (29.05.2013) EDP deadline Headline deficit Structural effort Adjusted structural effort Bottom-up approach 2010 EDP initiated on 30 November 2009 nts → - 5.3 % 0.5 % → 0.0 % 2011 nts → - 5.1 % 0.5 % → 0.0 % 2012 > - 3 % → 0.5 % → 2013 2014 2015 LEGEND: MEETING THE TARGET NOT MEETING THE TARGET NO TARGET SET (nts) NOT APPLICABLE (n/a) DATA NOT AVAILABLE DATA AVAILABLE, BUT NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY COMMISSION EDP DEADLINE nts → - 5.7 % + 0.5 % → - 0.5 % nts → - 4.6 % + 0.5 % → + 2.3 % nts → - 5.7 % + 0.5 % → 0.0 % nts → - 4.0 % + 0.5 % → + 0.4 % > - 3 %→ 0.5 % → > - 3 % → - 3.2 % + 0.5 % → + 0.4 % nts → - 3.9 % + 0.5 % → - 0.9 % > - 3 % → - 2.0 % + 0.5 % → - 0.6 % > - 3 % → - 3.0 % + 0.5 % → + 2.2 % > - 3 % → - 1.1 % > - 3 % → - 2.9 % > - 3 % → - 2.5 % EDP abrogated on 21 June 2013 Annex VI 
2013. (29.5.2013.) Rok EDP-a Ukupan deficit Strukturni napor Prilagođeni strukturni napor Pristup odozdo prema gore cno → - 5,3% 0,5% → 0,0% cno → - 5,7% + 0,5% → - 0,5% cno → - 4,6% + 0,5% → + 2,3% cno → - 5,7% + 0,5% → 0,0% cno → - 4,0% + 0,5% → + 0,4% > - 3% → 0,5% → > - 3% → - 3,2% + 0,5% → + 0,4% cno → - 3,9% + 0,5% → - 0,9% > - 3% → - 2,0% + 0,5% → - 0,6% > - 3% → - 3,0% + 0,5% → + 2,2% > - 3% → - 1,1% > - 3% → - 2,9% > - 3% → - 2,5% EDP ukinut 21. lipnja 2013. g.
This includes (...) reforms to improve the framework for competition in services and promote the integration of the low-skilled and long-term unemployed into the labour market through a flexicurity approach which combines better access to qualifications with improved incentives to work the Council invites the German authorities to implement reforms with a view to raising potential GDP growth Italy 30.11.2009 the Italian authorities should ensure an average annual fiscal effort of 0.5 percentage points of GDP over the period 2010-2012 the Italian authorities should ensure an average annual fiscal effort of at least 0.5 percentage points of GDP over the period 2010-2012 the Italian authorities are also invited to step up efforts to strengthen competition in product and services markets, simplify legislation, reduce the administrative burden at all levels of government and, within a ‘flexicurity’ approach and with a view to reducing regional disparities, improve the functioning of the labour market and the efficiency, outcomes and standards of the education system Nil Source: ECA. 
2010. 2012. 2010. 2012. Talijanske vlasti također se pozivaju da ulože više napora u osnaživanje tržišnog natjecanja na tržištima proizvoda i usluga, pojednostave zakonske akte, smanje administrativno opterećenje na svim razinama vlasti i – u okviru pristupa fleksigurnosti i u cilju smanjenja razlika među regijama – unaprijede funkcioniranje tržišta rada te djelotvornost, ishode i standarde obrazovnog sustava.
Annexes 101 Implementation of planned structural reforms 2011 2012 2013 France CSR1 CSR2 CSR3 CSR4 CSR5 Partly implemented Some progress Some progress / limited progress / some progress Partly implemented Some progress Some progress / some progress / some progress Partly implemented Some progress Some progress / some progress / some progress Partly implemented Substantial progress Limited progress/limited progress / some progress Partly implemented Limited progress No progress / no progress / some progress Italy CSR1 CSR2 CSR3 CSR4 CSR5 CSR6 Partly implemented Some progress Limited progress Partly implemented Fully addressed / some progress Limited progress Partly implemented Some progress Some progress Partly implemented Some progress Limited progress Partly implemented Limited progress Limited progress Partly implemented Some progress Limited progress Malta CSR1 CSR2 CSR3 CSR4 CSR5 CSR6 Partially implemented Not implemented Some progress Not implemented No progress Limited progress Partially implemented Some progress Some progress Not implemented No progress Limited progress Partially implemented Limited progress Some progress Some progress Germany CSR1 CSR2 CSR3 CSR4 Partially implemented Partially implemented Partially implemented Partially implemented Annex VIII 
2012. 2013. FRANCUSKA PPZ1 PPZ2 PPZ3 PPZ4 PPZ5 djelomično provedene određen napredak određen napredak/ograničen napredak/ određen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak određen napredak/određen napredak/ određen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak određen napredak/određen napredak/ određen napredak djelomično provedene značajan napredak ograničen napredak/ograničen napredak/ određen napredak djelomično provedene ograničen napredak bez napretka/bez napretka/određen napredak ITALIJA PPZ1 PPZ2 PPZ3 PPZ4 PPZ5 PPZ6 djelomično provedene određen napredak ograničen napredak djelomično provedene u cijelosti provedene ograničen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak određen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak ograničen napredak djelomično provedene ograničen napredak ograničen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak ograničen napredak MALTA PPZ1 PPZ2 PPZ3 PPZ4 PPZ5 PPZ6 djelomično provedene nisu provedene određen napredak nisu provedene bez napretka ograničen napredak djelomično provedene određen napredak određen napredak nisu provedene bez napretka ograničen napredak djelomično provedene ograničen napredak određen napredak određen napredak NJEMAČKA PPZ1 PPZ2 PPZ3 PPZ4 djelomično provedene djelomično provedene djelomično provedene djelomično provedene Prilog VIII.
Reply of the Commission 103 Executive summary V Detailed procedures and guidelines have been put in place regarding data quality assessment as well as the analysis and assessment of compliance under the fiscal rules. 
Odgovori 103 Komisije Sažetak V Uspostavljeni su detaljni postupci i smjernice u pogledu ocjenjivanja kvalitete podataka te analize i ocjene usklađenosti u skladu s fiskalnim pravilima.
The Commission would like to stress that the EDP data report‐ ing by Member States has been greatly refined since 2005. 
Komisija bi željela istaknuti da je izvješćivanje o podacima o postupku u slučaju prekomjernog deficita (EDP) znatno razrađeno od 2005.
The Commission does not agree with the conclusions of inadequate feedback and poor record‐keeping, as material information has been properly assessed and documentation has significantly improved over recent years. 
Komisija se ne slaže sa zaključcima o neprimjerenim povratnim informacijama i lošem vođenju evidencije jer su ključne informacije primjereno ocijenjene, a evidentiranje se posljednjih godina znatno poboljšalo.
The Council recommendations and decisions implementing the Stability and Growth Pact are prepared by the Economic and Financial Committee (EFC). 
Preporuke i odluke Vijeća o provedbi Pakta o stabilnosti i rastu priprema Gospodarski i financijski odbor (GFO).
In addition to the Commission’s reporting to the EFC, the legal texts and accompa‐ nying Staff Working Documents (SWDs), which are publicly available, contain extensive additional information and explanations on EDP‐related decisions. 
Osim izvješća Komisije GFO-u, pravni tekstovi i popratni radni dokumenti službi, koji su javno dostupni, sadržavaju opsežne dodatne informacije i objašnjenja o odlukama povezanima s postupkom u slučaju prekomjernog deficita.
The members of the EFC include representatives from all the Member States, the European Commission and the European Central Bank. 
Članovi GFO-a uključuju predstavnike iz svih država članica, Europske komisije i Europske središnje banke.
Minutes are kept for all the EFC meetings to record the Committee’s work for present and future reference. 
Na svim sastancima GFO-a vodi se zapisnik o radu Odbora kako bi mogao poslužiti kao referentni dokument za sadašnjost i budućnost.
The minutes summarise the exchange of views among members and record the decisions that were taken. 
U zapisniku se sažima razmjena stajališta među članovima i unesene su donesene odluke.
The Secretariat prepares draft minutes after each meeting and circulates them to the members for their comments. 
Tajništvo nakon svakog sastanka sastavlja nacrt zapisnika i dostavlja ga članovima da daju svoje primjedbe.
The minutes are adopted at the subsequent meeting of the EFC. 
Zapisnici se prihvaćaju na sljedećem sastanku GFO-a.
Mem‐ bers may take notes for their own use during the meetings, although unauthorised disclosure of any non‐public information is prohibited. 
Članovi mogu tijekom sastanaka voditi bilješke za vlastite potrebe iako je zabranjeno neovlašteno otkrivanje informacija koje nisu javne.
Following the endorsement by the EFC of the draft Council documents implementing the SGP, the Secretariat of the EFC forwards the draft documents to the Secretariat of the Council. 
Nakon što je GFO potvrdio nacrt dokumenata Vijeća o provedbi Pakta o stabilnosti i rastu, Tajništvo GFO-a prosljeđuje nacrt tih dokumenata Tajništvu Vijeća.
The Council recommendations and decisions are adopted by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (Ecofin). 
Preporuke i odluke Vijeća donosi Vijeće za ekonomske i financijske poslove (Ecofin).
Minutes are also kept for all the meetings of the Ecofin. 
Zapisnici se vode i na svim sastancima Ecofina.
VI The Commission considers that transparency has recently been enhanced significantly. 
VI Komisija smatra da je transparentnost nedavno znatno pojačana.
The Commission however does not agree that information was generally unavailable. 
Međutim, ona se ne slaže da su informacije općenito bile nedostupne.
On the contrary, the Commission is fully committed to transparency. 
Naprotiv, Komisija je potpuno opredijeljena za transparentnost.
In the statistical field, the Commission pub‐ lishes methodological advice and guidance, provided it does not breach statistical confidentiality enshrined in Council Regulation 479/2009. 
U području statistike Komisija objavljuje metodološke savjete i smjernice ako se time ne krši statistička povjerljivost utvrđena u Uredbi Vijeća (EZ) br. 479/2009.
With the European System of Accounts, the Commission’s approach is clearly rules‐based and the Commission does not depart from established procedures. 
S Europskim sustavom računa pristup Komisije jasno je utemeljen na pravilima, a Komisija ne odstupa od utvrđenih postupaka.
Applying sound judgement in line with the rules instead of a purely mechanistic approach is, however, a core task of the Commission and is the only means to properly reflect the diversity of Member States and issues at stake. 
Međutim, Komisija umjesto čisto mehaničkog pristupa mora primijeniti zdravu prosudbu u skladu s pravilima jer se jedino na taj način može ispravno uzeti u obzir različitost država članica i predmetnih pitanja.
In recent years, the EU fiscal framework has undergone several changes with a view to introducing complementary rules, strengthening compliance mechanisms and raising national ownership. 
Posljednjih godina fiskalni okvir EU-a nekoliko je puta izmijenjen u cilju uvođenja komplementarnih pravila, jačanja mehanizama usklađivanja i povećanja nacionalnog vlasništva.
Reply of the Commission 104 The legislative changes introduced had to be technically operationalised. To this end, the methodologies and clas‐ sifications utilised in assessing compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) had to be adapted. 
Odgovori Komisije 104 Uvedene izmjene zakona morale su se tehnički provesti. U tu svrhu trebalo je prilagoditi metodologije i klasifikacije koje se upotrebljavaju za ocjenjivanje usklađenosti s Paktom o stabilnosti i rastu (PSR).
VII In relation to the implementation of structural reforms, the Commission would like to clarify that although appro‐ priate structural reforms can play a key role in eliminating excessive deficits, their implementation is not a legally relevant component in the abrogation of an EDP. 
VII U pogledu provedbe strukturnih reformi Komisija bi željela objasniti da iako odgovarajuće strukturne reforme mogu imati ključnu ulogu u uklanjanju prekomjernih deficita, njihova provedba nije pravno relevantna komponenta u obustavi postupka u slučaju prekomjernog deficita.
In terms of enforcement, the focus of the legislation which governs the EDP is fiscal outcomes and, as such, the relevant legislation does not contain specific provision to enforce the implementation of structural reforms. 
U pogledu izvršenja, zakonodavstvo kojim je uređen postupak u slučaju prekomjernog deficita usmjereno je na fiskalne ishode te stoga primjenjivo zakonodavstvo ne sadržava posebne odredbe za izvršenje provedbe strukturnih reformi.
Indeed, it is important to re‐state that the assessment of effective action under an EDP is focussed on the delivery of the required budgetary adjustment and is not affected by the evaluation of structural reforms. 
Važno je ponoviti da je ocjenjivanje djelotvornih mjera u okviru postupka u slučaju prekomjernog deficita usmjereno na uvođenje potrebnih proračunskih prilagodbi i da na njega ne utječe evaluacija strukturnih reformi.
The implementation of structural reforms, including those undertaken under an Economic Partnership Programme (EPP), is monitored in the context of the European Semester, including under the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure. 
Provedba strukturnih reformi, među ostalim onih koje se poduzimaju u okviru programa gospodarskog partnerstva (PGP), nadzire se u kontekstu europskog semestra, uključujući u okviru postupka zbog makroekonomskih neravnoteža.
However, the Article 9 of Regulation (EU) No 473/2013 of 21 May 2013 does not foresee specific steps in cases where the imple‐ mentation of structural reforms falls short of what is recommended in the analysis of the EPP. 
473/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. svibnja 2013. nisu predviđeni posebni koraci u slučajevima kada se provedbom strukturnih reformi ne ostvari ono što se preporučuje u analizi PGP-a.
For countries subject to specific monitoring due to the presence of excessive imbalances, the implementation of reforms is monitored under the Excessive Imbalances Procedure. 
U državama koje podliježu posebnom praćenju zbog postojanja prekomjernih neravnoteža provedba reformi nadzire se u okviru postupka zbog prekomjernih neravnoteža.
That said, at the point of examining whether an EDP needs to be opened for a given Member State, the Commission analyses carefully all relevant medium‐term developments regarding the economic, budgetary and debt positions. 
Stoga, kada procjenjuje treba li za neku državu članicu pokrenuti postupak u slučaju prekomjernog deficita, Komisija pomno analizira sva relevantna srednjoročna kretanja u pogledu ekonomskih i proračunskih stanja te stanja duga.
These ‘relevant factors’ include the implementation of structural reforms in the context of the European Semester such as within the Excessive Imbalances Procedure. 
Ti „relevantni čimbenici” uključuju provedbu strukturnih reformi u okviru europskog semestra, primjerice u okviru postupka zbog prekomjernih neravnoteža.
The Commission considers that a lack of implementation of structural reforms constitutes an aggravating relevant factor. 
Komisija smatra da je izostanak provedbe strukturnih reformi otežavajući relevantni čimbenik.
Reply of the Commission 105 The Commission does not agree that the EDP over‐emphasises the deficit dimension at the expense of debt. In particular, since the 2011 reform of the legislation known as ‘the Six‐pack’, the breach of the debt threshold of 60% of GDP has been elevated to the trigger of the EDP. 
Odgovori Komisije 105 Komisija se ne slaže da se postupkom u slučaju prekomjernog deficita pretjerano naglašava dimenzija deficita na štetu duga, posebno budući da je od reforme zakonodavstva iz 2011., koja je poznata pod nazivom „paket od šest mjera”, povreda praga razine duga od 60 % BDP-a povećana do razine pokretanja postupka u slučaju prekomjernog deficita.
The Commission has opened a debt‐based (and deficit‐based) EDP for Malta in 2013, which has successfully exited the procedure in 2015. 
Komisija je 2013. u pogledu Malte pokrenula postupak u slučaju prekomjernog deficita utemeljen na dugu (i na deficitu) i ona je uspješno izašla iz postupka 2015.
At the same time, the concept of debt diminishing at a satisfactory pace was operationalised through the debt‐reduction benchmark and is now assessed as part of the Commission’s regular monitoring of Member States’ fiscal positions. 
Istovremeno je pojam umanjivanja duga zadovoljavajućom dinamikom primijenjen s pomoću referentne vrijednosti za smanjenje duga i sada se ocjenjuje kao dio Komisijina redovitog praćenja fiskalnih položaja država članica.
VIII The Commission is committed to equal treatment of Member States. 
VIII Komisija se obvezala jednako postupati prema državama članicama.
Where shortcomings in this respect have been identified, the Commission has taken action to ensure the consistent application of rules and will continue to do so. 
Ako u tom pogledu budu utvrđeni nedostaci, Komisija je poduzela mjere za osiguranje dosljedne primjene pravila i nastavit će to činiti.
The Commission has greatly improved transparency since 2005. 
Komisija je od 2005. znatno povećala transparentnost.
In the field of EDP data and methodological ques‐ tions, the Commission is publishing all mission reports, bilateral advice given to Member States and other relevant information. 
U području podataka o EDP-u i metodoloških pitanja Komisija objavljuje sva izvješća s misija, bilateralne savjete pružene državama članicama i druge relevantne informacije.
While the Commission acknowledges that there has been a lack of transparency regarding the fiscal surveillance process until a number of years ago, the Commission stresses that these shortcomings have been decisively tackled in recent years through the actions mentioned above (see Commission’s reply to paragraph VI), including the provi‐ sion of more detailed information as well as the advance codification of the key concepts and methodologies. 
Iako potvrđuje da do prije nekoliko godina postupak fiskalnog nadzora nije bio dovoljno transparentan, Komisija ističe da su ti nedostaci odlučno uklonjeni posljednjih godina s pomoću prethodno spomenutih mjera (vidjeti odgovor Komisije na odlomak VI.), uključujući pružanjem detaljnijih informacija i prethodnom kodifikacijom ključnih pojmova i metodologija.
IX (a) The Commission accepts similar (while not exactly the same) recommendations made in the ‘Conclusions and rec‐ ommendations’ section of the report (recommendations 1 to 4). 
IX točka (a) Komisija prihvaća slične (iako ne potpuno iste) preporuke navedene u odjeljku izvješća o „Zaključcima i preporu-kama” (1. do 4. preporuka).
IX (a) (i) The Commission considers the current quality assessment procedures appropriate. 
IX točka (a) podtočka i. Komisija smatra da su postojeći postupci ocjenjivanja kvalitete primjereni.
It will continue to endeavour to better document this work. 
I dalje će nastojati bolje evidentirati svoj rad.