natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Recommendation 3 Improve projects’ selection The Commission should further improve the standardised evaluation grids and the guidelines for assessors so as to ensure that all assessments are coherent and consistent. 
3. preporuka Poboljšanje postupka odabira projekata Komisija bi trebala dodatno poboljšati standardizirane evaluacijske tabli‐ ce i smjernice za ocjenjivače kako bi zajamčila usklađeno i dosljedno ocjenjivanje projektnih prijedloga.
It should be fully clear to assessors precisely which criteria they should assess and how they should give scores. 
Ocjenjivačima bi trebalo biti potpuno jasno koje kriterije ocjenjuju i na koji način boduju prijedloge.
The reassessment approach should be clear and consistently applied. 
Pristup provedbi ponov‐ ne ocjene treba biti jasan i dosljedan.
Conclusions and recommendations 27 Recommendation 4 Better use the possibilities for improving project proposals where assessors have identified design weaknesses The Commission should more systematically invite applicants to adjust their project proposals to ensure that weaknesses identified by the assessors are better taken into account, while safeguarding that djustments are non-substantial so that fair and equal treatment remains guaranteed. 
Zaključci i preporuke 27 4. preporuka Bolje iskorištavanje mogućnosti da se poboljšaju projektni prijedlozi kada ocjenjivači uoče nedostatke u njiho‐ vim konceptima Komisija bi trebala na sustavniji način pozivati podnositelje zahtjeva da pri‐ lagode svoje projektne prijedloge tako da obrate veću pozornost na nedostat‐ ke koje su uočili ocjenjivači i pobrinuti se da pritom prijedlog ne bude bitno izmijenjen kako bi se zajamčilo pra‐ vedno i jednako postupanje prema podnositeljima zahtjeva.
56 By and large, project activities have been carried out as planned and are generally cost-effective, in particular the projects implemented by civil society organisations in partner countries. 
56 Projektne aktivnosti većinom su pro‐ vedene prema planu i uglavnom su isplative, posebno kad je riječ o projek‐ tima koje su provele organizacije civil‐ nog društva u partnerskim zemljama.
However, the systems for measuring impacts are rather weak, with unclear logical frameworks for projects, a lack of well-defined benchmarks and targets, and an inconsistent approach to project evaluations. 
Među‐ tim, sustavi za mjerenje učinaka prilič‐ no su slabi, karakteriziraju ih nejasne logičke matrice za projekte, manjak precizno utvrđenih referentnih i ciljnih vrijednosti i nedosljedan pristup evalu‐ aciji projekata.
When projects provide assistance for victims, the impact is tangible, albeit limited to relatively small target groups. 
Projekti kojima se pruža pomoć žrtvama ostvaruju primjetan učinak, ali samo u razmjerno malim ciljnim skupinama.
The contribution of projects which seek legislative or policy reforms is difficult to assess as progress typically also depends on many other factors. 
Doprinos projekata kojima se potiču reforme zakono‐ davstva ili politike teško je procijeniti jer napredak obično ovisi i o brojnim drugim čimbenicima.
However, the civil society organisations that were supported mostly depend to a large extent on financial support and the intensity of their activities often decreases significantly when EIDHR funding ends (see paragraphs 32 to 53). 
Međutim, većina organizacija civilnog društva koje primaju financijsku pot‐ poru u velikoj mjeri ovise o njoj te nji‐ hove aktivnosti često znatno opadnu nakon što prestanu dobivati potporu iz EIDHR‐a (vidi odlomke 32. – 53.).
Recommendation 5 Develop the performance measure‐ ment framework further The Commission should simplify the template for the logical framework of EIDHR projects so that the links between objectives, activities and impacts become clearer. 
5. preporuka Dodatno poboljšanje okvira za mjere‐ nje uspješnosti Komisija bi trebala pojednostavniti obrazac logičke matrice za projekte EIDHR‐a kako bi ciljevi, aktivnosti i učinci bili jasnije povezani.
Impact indicators and measurable targets should be defined on the basis of baselines and project activities that are planned. 
Pokazate‐ lji učinka i mjerljive ciljne vrijednosti trebali bi se određivati na temelju osnovnih vrijednosti i planiranih pro‐ jektnih aktivnosti.
The approach to project evaluations should be harmonised. 
Potrebno je uskladiti pristup evaluaciji projekata.
Recommendation 6 Focus more on improving the sustain‐ ability of beneficiary organisations In its calls for proposals, the Commission should promote measures to make civil society organisations more self-sustainable, for example through donor coordination, and should consider ways to provide continued support for beneficiary organisations that are performing well. 
6. preporuka Pridavanje više pozornosti poboljša‐ nju financijske održivosti organizacija korisnica potpore Komisija bi u pozivima na podnošenje prijedloga trebala promicati mjere za poboljšanje financijske održivosti or‐ ganizacija civilnog društva, na primjer koordinacijom donatora, te bi trebala razmotriti načine na koje bi organiza‐ cijama koje postižu uspješne rezultate pružala stalnu potporu.
Conclusions and recommendations 28 This Report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mr Karel PINXTEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 30 June 2015. 
Zaključci i preporuke 28 Ovo je izvješće usvojilo III. revizijsko vijeće, kojim predsjeda član Revizorskog suda Karel PINXTEN, na sastanku održanom u Luxembourgu 30. lipnja 2015.
Annexes The death penalty in Africa 29 Annex I 0 250 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO © Turkstat Cape Verde Eritrea Abolitionist Abolitionist de facto Retentionist Source: Amnesty International 2013 500 750 1000 km South Africa Swaziland Lesotho Source: Eurostat. 
Prilozi Smrtna kazna u Africi 29 Prilog I. 0 250 Administrativne granice: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO © Turkstat Cape Verde Senegal Gambia Niger Eritrea Ethiopia Guinea-Bissau Guinea Sierra Leone Burkina Faso Benin Nigeria Djibouti Somalia Comoros Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu u praksi Države koje provode smrtnu kaznu Izvor: Amnesty International 2013 500 750 1000 km South Africa Swaziland Lesotho Izvor: Eurostat.
Senegal Gambia Mauritania Niger Libya Chad Egypt Sudan Guinea-Bissau Guinea Sierra Leone Nigeria Ethiopia Central African Republic South Sudan Djibouti Somalia Comoros Liberia Democratic Republic of the Congo Morocco Tunisia Algeria Mali Burkina Faso Benin Ghana Cameroon Equatorial Guinea Togo Côte d'Ivoire Sao Tome and Principe Gabon Congo Uganda Kenya Rwanda Seychelles Burundi Malawi Tanzania Angola Zambia Namibia Zimbabwe Botswana Madagascar Mozambique Mauritius 
Morocco Mauritania Tunisia Algeria Mali Libya Chad Egypt Sudan South Sudan Liberia Togo Cameroon Ghana Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Equatorial Guinea Democratic Republic of the Congo Uganda Kenya Rwanda Sao Tome and Principe Congo Seychelles Gabon Burundi Malawi Angola Zambia Namibia Zimbabwe Botswana Madagascar Mozambique Mauritius Tanzania Prilozi 30 Smrtna kazna u Aziji Prilog II.
Annexes 30 The death penalty in Asia Annex II 0 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO © Turkstat Georgia Azerbaijan Armenia Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Afghanistan Mongolia China Thailand Dem People's Rep of Korea Japan South Korea Philippines Indonesia Turkey Turkmenistan Lebanon Syria Iran Palestine Iraq Nepal Bhutan Israel Jordan Kuwait Qatar Pakistan Bahrain Saudi Arabia Yemen India Abolitionist Abolitionist de facto Abolitionist for ordinary crimes only Retentionist Source: Amnesty International 2013 250 500 750 1000 km Sri Lanka Maldives Malaysia Singapore United Arab Emirates Oman Bangladesh Myanmar Laos Cambodia Vietnam Brunei Malaysia Russian Federation This designation shall not be construed as recognition of a State of Palestine and is without prejudice to the individual positions of the Member States on this issue. 
0 Administrativne granice: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO © Turkstat Georgia Armenia Turkey Lebanon Syria Palestine Iraq Azerbaijan Turkmenistan Kazakhstan Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Russian Federation Mongolia China Thailand Israel Jordan Nepal Bhutan Bahrain Saudi Arabia Yemen India Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu u praksi Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu samo za kaznena djela obuhvaćena općim zakonodavstvom Države koje provode smrtnu kaznu Izvor: Amnesty International 2013 250 500 750 1000 km Sri Lanka Maldives Malaysia Singapore Malaysia Indonesia Iran Kuwait Qatar Tajikistan Afghanistan Dem People's Rep of Korea Japan SouthKorea Pakistan United Arab Emirates Oman Bangladesh Myanmar Laos Cambodia Vietnam Brunei Ovaj naziv ne znači priznanje države Palestine i ne dovodi u pitanje pojedinačna stajališta država članica o tom pitanju.
Source: Eurostat. 
Izvor: Eurostat.
Annexes 31 The death penalty in Latin America United States of America Mexico Bahamas Haiti Dominican Republic Annex III Cuba Jamaica Haiti Dominican Republic Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Grenada Venezuela Antigua and Barbuda Guadeloupe (France) Dominica Martinique (France) Barbados Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Guyana Panama Colombia Abolitionist Abolitionist de facto Abolitionist for ordinary crimes only Retentionist Source: Amnesty International 2013 0 250 500 750 1000 km Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO Source: Eurostat. 
Philippines Prilozi 31 Smrtna kazna u Latinskoj Americi United States of America Mexico Bahamas Haiti Dominican Republic Bahamas Haiti Panama Colombia Dominican Republic Antigua and Barbuda Guadeloupe (France) Dominica Martinique (France) Barbados Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Guyana Bolivia Paraguay Argentina Cuba Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Grenada Venezuela Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu u praksi Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu samo za kaznena djela obuhvaćena općim zakonodavstvom Države koje provode smrtnu kaznu Izvor: Amnesty International 2013 0 250 500 750 1000 km Administrativne granice: © EuroGeographics © UN-FAO Izvor: Eurostat.
Bahamas Bolivia Paraguay Argentina Guatemala El Salvador Venezuela Guyana Suriname Guyana (France) Brazil Uruguay Costa Rica Colombia Belize Cuba Jamaica Honduras Nicaragua Panama Ecuador Peru Chile 
Guatemala El Salvador Venezuela Guyana Suriname Guyana (France) Brazil Uruguay Costa Rica Colombia Belize Cuba Jamaica Honduras Nicaragua Panama Ecuador Peru Chile Prilog III.
Annexes 32 The death penalty in the United States Annex IV 0 1000 km 0 500 1000 km 250 500 Alaska 750 0 200 Source: Amnesty International 2013 Administrative boundaries: © UN-FAO California Russia Arizona Canada Kansas Oklahoma Texas Missouri Arkansas Indiana Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Mississippi Source: Eurostat. 
Prilozi 32 Smrtna kazna u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama Prilog IV. 0 1000 km 0 500 1000 km 250 500 0 200 Izvor: Amnesty International 2013 Administrativne granice: © UN-FAO California Russia Oklahoma Texas Missouri Arkansas Indiana Kentucky Tennessee Alabama Mississippi West Virginia Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Izvor: Eurostat.
Washington Oregon Nevada Idaho Utah Montana Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Canada North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Minnesota Iowa Wisconsin Illinois Vermont New York Pennsylvania West Virginia Virginia North Carolina South Carolina Maine New Hampshire Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New Jersey Delaware Maryland District of Columbia Bahamas Cuba Mexico Hawaii 400 km Louisiana Abolitionist Retentionist Florida Michigan Ohio Georgia 
Washington Oregon Nevada Idaho Utah Montana Wyoming Colorado New Mexico Canada North Dakota South Dakota Nebraska Kansas Minnesota Iowa Wisconsin Illinois Michigan Vermont New York Pennsylvania Maine New Hampshire Massachusetts Rhode Island Connecticut New Jersey Delaware Maryland District of Columbia Bahamas Cuba Alaska 750 Države koje su ukinule smrtnu kaznu Države koje provode smrtnu kaznu Arizona Canada Georgia Mexico Hawaii 400 km Florida Louisiana Ohio
Annexes 34 Projects for which the Court’s auditors reviewed the Commission’s assessment of concept notes and full proposals Country Contract number Call for proposal Subject Beneficiary Project name Grant amount (euro) Reason for selection Georgia 2008/148-044 2007/126-224 Torture Association Justice and Liberty Prevention of torture in military guardhouses. 
Prilozi 34 Projekti za koje su revizori Suda analizirali ocjenu projektnog sažetka i cjelovitog prijedloga koju je provela Komisija Država Broj ugovora Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga Predmet Korisnik Naziv projekta Iznos bespovratnih sredstava (eura) Razlog odabira projekta Gruzija 2008/148-044 2007/126-224 Mučenje Association Justice And Liberty Prevention of torture in military guardhouses 204 961,00 Provedena je revizija 2008/148-184 2007/126-224 Mučenje Empathy Association Strengthening the System of Rehabilitation for Torture Victims in Georgia 679 937,00 Provedena je revizija Kina 2008/148-024 2007/126-224 Mučenje The Great Britain China Centre Prevention of Torture in the PRC 787 966,00 Provedena je revizija Demokratska Republika Kongo 2008/148-156 2007/126-224 Mučenje Solidarité Pour La Promotion Sociale Et La Paix Asbl Assistance et réhabilitation des victimes de la torture en RDC 421 836,00 Provedena je revizija Argentina, Brazil, Madagaskar, Maroko, Tajland i Turska 2008/148-045 2007/126-224 Mučenje Association for the prevention of torture Preventing torture through the promotion of the Optional Protocol to the convention against Torture in five target countries 986 306,00 Bitna razlika u bodovima ocjenjivača Moldova 2008/148-070 2007/126-224 Mučenje United Nations Development Programme Support for the strengthening the national preventive mechanism as per OPCAT provisions 640 000,00 Bitna razlika u bodovima ocjenjivača Izrael 2009/148-034 2007/126-224 Mučenje Adalah-The legal Center for Arab minority rights in Israel Combating and preventing torture and ill-treatment of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli prisons and Palestinian civilians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory 638 651,00 Nedostajao je mali broj bodova da bude odabran Argentina ugovor nije sklopljen 2007/126-224 Mučenje Comité para la defensa de la salud, la ética profesional y los derechos humanos asocian civil Programa de asistencia y rehabilitación a víctimas de la represión y la tortura en contextos de acciones judiciales por crímenes de las humanidad 683 708,00 Nedostajao je mali broj bodova da bude odabran Prilog VI.
Annexes 39 Country Contract number Call for proposal Subject Beneficiary Project name Grant amount (euro) Reason for selection Democratic Republic of the Congo 2010/222-810 2010/128-815 Torture Coopi - Cooperazione Internazionale Projet de prévention, protection et réhabilitation des victimes de VS et de leurs communautés et au renforcement des capacités communautaires et étatiques à l’Est de la RDC 1 395 000.00 Audited United Kingdom, London 2010/222-086 2010/128-815 Torture Penal Reform International Strengthening institutions and building civil society capacity to combat torture in nine CIS countries 1 130 583.00 Audited 2010/222-733 2010/128-815 Torture The Redress Trust Limited Lbg Reparation for torture: global sharing of expertise 1 033 805.00 Audited Benin 2010/223-216 2010/128-815 Torture Care France Association ETODE: Pour la justice et les droits des femmes et des filles 1 159 409.00 Just fell short for selection Nigeria not contracted 2010/128-815 Torture Concern Universal Preventing women’s ill-treat-ment/Rehabilitating widows in CRS and Eboyni State 313 060.00 Assessors’ scores are significantly different Turkey not contracted 2010/128-815 Torture Roh Saglig-inda Insan Haklari Girisimi (Human Rights in Mental Health Initiative) Project for creating a civic monitoring system in the mental health field 380 000.00 Project name does not relate to the objective of the global call Source: European Commission. 
1 194 359,00 Provedena je revizija DR Kongo 2010/222-810 2010/128-815 Mučenje Coopi - Cooperazione Internazionale Projet de prévention, protection et réhabilitation des victimes de VS et de leurs communautés et au renforcement des capacités communautaires et étatiques à l’Est de la RDC 1 395 000,00 Provedena je revizija Prilog VI. Prilozi 39 Država Broj ugovora Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga Predmet Korisnik Naziv projekta Iznos bespovratnih sredstava (eura) Razlog odabira projekta London, Ujedinjena Kraljevina 2010/222-086 2010/128-815 Mučenje Penal Reform International Strengthening institutions and building civil society capacity to combat torture in 9 CIS countries 1 130 583,00 Provedena je revizija 2010/222-733 2010/128-815 Mučenje The Redress Trust Limited Lbg Reparation for torture: Global Sharing of Expertise 1 033 805,00 Provedena je revizija Benin 2010/223-216 2010/128-815 Mučenje Care France Association ETODE: Pour la justice et les droits des femmes et des filles 1 159 409,00 Nedostajao je mali broj bodova da bude odabran Nigerija ugovor nije sklopljen 2010/128-815 Mučenje Concern Universal Preventing Women’s Ill-treatment / Rehabilitating widows in CRS and Eboyni State 313 060,00 Bitna razlika u bodovima ocjenjivača Turska ugovor nije sklopljen 2010/128-815 Mučenje Roh Sagliginda Insan Haklari Girisimi (Hu-man Rights in Mental Health Initiative) Project for creating a civic monitoring system in the mental health field 380 000,00 Naziv projekta nije povezan s ciljem globalnog poziva Izvor: Europska komisija.
1 194 359.00 2012/302-948 131-543 Torture The Greater Nelspruit Rape Intervention Project Group Sexual assault and domestic violence rights programme. 173 317.00 Annex VII 
1 194 359,00 2012/302-948 131-543 Mučenje The Greater Nelspruit Rape Intervention Project Group Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Rights Programme 173 317,00 Prilog VII.
Annexes 42 Country Contract number Call for proposal Subject Beneficiary Project name Grant amount (euro) United States 2009/167-748 2008/127-238 Death penalty Murder Victim’s Families For Human Rights Voices of victims against the death penalty 485 615.65 2009/167-820 2008/127-238 Death penalty The National Coalition To Abolish The Death Penalty National coalition to abolish the death penalty intensive assistance program 305 060.86 2009/167-888 2008/127-238 Death penalty Witness To Innocence American DREAM campaign 374 944.62 2009/211-244 2008/127-238 Death penalty American Bar Association The death penalty assessments project: toward a nationwide moratorium on executions 708 162.00 2009/167-889 2008/127-238 Death penalty Death Penalty Information Center Changing the course of the death penalty debate: a proposal for public opinion research, message development, and communications on capital punishment in the US 193 443.00 2012/297-076 2011/131-085/2 Death penalty Witness To Innocence Eyes wide open project 850 032.14 2012/297-078 2011/131-085/2 Death penalty Equal Justice USA Inc Corporation Breaking barriers: engaging new voices to abolish the death penalty in the United States 495 014.31 Source: European Commission. 
Prilozi 42 Država Broj ugovora Poziv na podnošenje prijedloga Predmet Korisnik Naziv projekta Iznos bespovratnih sredstava (eura) Sjedinjene Američke Države 2009/167-748 2008/127-238 Smrtna kazna Murder Victim’s Families For Human Rights Voices of Victims Against the Death Penalty 485 615,65 2009/167-820 2008/127-238 Smrtna kazna The National Coalition To Abolish The Death Penalty National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty Intensive Assistance Program 305 060,86 2009/167-888 2008/127-238 Smrtna kazna Witness To Innocence American DREAM Campaign 374 944,62 2009/211-244 2008/127-238 Smrtna kazna American Bar Association The Death Penalty Assessments Project: Toward a Nationwide Moratorium on Executions 708 162,00 2009/167-889 2008/127-238 Smrtna kazna Death Penalty Information Center Changing the Course of the Death Penalty Debate: A Proposal for Public Opinion Research, Message Development, and Communications on Capital Punishment in the U.S. 193 443,00 2012/297-076 2011/131-085/2 Smrtna kazna Witness To Innocence Eyes Wide Open Project 850 032,14 2012/297-078 2011/131-085/2 Smrtna kazna Equal Justice USA Inc Corporation Breaking Barriers: Engaging New Voices to Abolish the Death Penalty in the United States 495 014,31 Izvor: Europska komisija.
Reply of the Commission 43 and the EEAS Executive summary IV The Commission and the EEAS are fully convinced of the effectiveness of the EIDHR as one of several instruments in the fight against torture and the death penalty, a belief widely shared by the human rights community at large. 
Odgovori Komisije 43 i ESVD‐a Sažetak IV Komisija i Europska služba za vanjsko djelovanje (ESVD) potpuno su uvjerene u djelotvornost Europ‐ skog instrumenta za demokraciju i ljudska prava (EIDHR) kao jednog od nekoliko instrumenata za borbu protiv mučenja i smrtne kazne.
This is evidenced for instance by the American Bar Association’s public acknowledgment of the role of an EIDHR grant in the abolition of the death penalty in the state of Pennsylvania. 
Dokaz je za to, na primjer, javno priznanje Američke odvjetničke komore (eng. American Bar Association) u pogledu uloge bespovratnih sred‐ stava EIDHR‐a u ukidanju smrtne kazne u državi Pennsylvaniji.
V The EIDHR is fully consistent with the European Union’s human rights priorities, both globally and for individual countries. 
V EIDHR je u potpunosti u skladu s prioritetima Europ‐ ske unije u području ljudskih prava, ne samo na globalnoj razini nego i na razini pojedinih zemalja.
The nature and objectives of the EIDHR put human rights organisations in the driving seat and give them an effective and practical tool to reach their own policy objectives, while at the same time helping to reach those of the EU — a win–win situation. 
S obzirom na prirodu i ciljeve EIDHR‐a organiza‐ cijama za ljudska prava prepušteno je vodstvo te im je dan učinkovit i praktičan alat za postizanje ciljeva vlastite politike, uz istovremeno pružanje pomoći u postizanju ciljeva EU‐a, a to je situacija u kojoj svi dobivaju.
The grants award procedures on which the EIDHR is based are strictly and transparently implemented, a notable feat considering the very large number of applicants across the world under each call and the inherent difficulty in assessing applications in a field — human rights protection — that does not lend itself easily to quantifiable assessments. 
Postupci dodjele bespovrat‐ nih sredstava na kojima se temelji EIDHR provode se strogo i transparentno, što je značajan pothvat s obzirom na vrlo velik broj podnositelja zahtjeva diljem svijeta u okviru svakog poziva i inherentne poteškoće u procjeni zahtjeva u području – zaštiti ljudskih prava – koje ne može lako biti predmet mjerljivih procjena.
The EIDHR covers actions in very complex political situations and often difficult country settings, considering that human rights objectives are not easily achievable even under the most favourable conditions. 
EIDHR‐om su obuhvaćena djelo‐ vanja u vrlo složenim političkim situacijama i često teškim okolnostima u zemljama, uzimajući u obzir činjenicu da ciljevi u području ljudskih prava nisu lako ostvarivi čak i u najpovoljnijim uvjetima.
The exceedingly low number of complaints or litigation related to the EIDHR — and indeed the persistently high number of applications in each call for proposals (a total of ca. 1 200 concept note applications under the calls for proposals studied by the Court) — show that this view is also shared by the global human rights community at large. 
Vrlo mali broj pritužbi ili sporova povezanih s EIDHR‐om i stalno velik broj zahtjeva u okviru svakog poziva na podnošenje prijedloga (ukupno oko 1200 prijava projektnih sažetaka u okviru poziva na podnošenje prijedloga koje je ispitao Sud) pokazuju da to staja‐ lište općenito dijeli i globalna zajednica za ljudska prava.