natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6 387 113 X 37 Tramo 1o Fase2a Def. rellenos D. Este: quiebro 1o y 2a alineación Espigón Cueva Bermeja 5 673 967 2 809 113 Construction of new land area adjacent to the existing breakwater, to support operations on the dock for liquid and dry bulk. 
6 387 113 X 37 Tramo 1o Fase2a Def. rellenos D. Este: quiebro 1o y 2a alineación Espigón Cueva Bermeja 5 673 967 2 809 113 Izgradnja novog zemljišta pokraj postojećeg lukobrana radi potpore radovima na doku povezanima s tekućim i suhim teretom 2 809 113 X 2 809 113 Država članica Luka Ispitani projekt Sadržaj projekta Kapacitet Povezanost Ostalo zirano ostvare-nje1 Španjolska 1. zbroj (isključujući ponovno revidirane projekte) 2 461 546 621 1 076 626 856 Ukupno novih projekata nad kojima je provedena revizija po kategoriji: 447 553 574 599 658 626 29 414 656 7 18 12 193 775 022 Ukupno novih projekata nad kojima je provedena revizija: 1 076 626 856 Ukupno novih projekata nad kojima je provedena revizija u % od ukupnog broja: 41,57 55,70 2,73 Prilog II.
Annexes 75 1 2 Finding at the time of the audit visit. 
Prilozi 75 1 2 Rezultati u vrijeme revizije.
No of Mem-pro- ber jects State Port Project examined Project costs in euros EU-funding in euros Project contents Capacity Connection Others Uncom-pleted output1 Output completed and used as planned1 Output completed and unused or heavily underused % of amount of unused or heavily underused EU funding spent or to be spent2 Re-audited projects 38 Italy Augusta Port of Augusta 15 493 707 3 839 328 Construction of buildings, quays, RO-RO berths, pavements, barriers, external systems for the completion of the commercial port of Augusta. 
Broj projekata Troškovi projekta u eurima Sredstva EU-a u eurima Reali-Ostvare- nje je re-alizirano i iskorišteno prema planu1 Ostvarenje je realizi-rano, ali je neiskorišteno ili iskorišteno vrlo slabo % iznosa sredstava EU-a koja su potrošena ili će se potrošiti, a nisu se koristila ili su se vrlo slabo koristila2 40 Punta Langosteira (La Coruña) Nuevas instalaciones portuarias en Punta Langosteira (La Coruña) – 1a Fase – Korisnik: Autoridad Portuaria de A Coruña 590 172 648 257 539 720 Izgradnja vanjske luke uz postojeću luku 257 539 720 X 244 662 734 41 Ferrol 110 860 209 39 065 500 Izgradnja vanjske luke kao nadopune postojećoj luci 39 065 500 X 35 158 950 42 Arinaga, Las Palmas Puerto de Arinaga – Muelle de Agüimes 1a fase A” korisnik: Autoridad Portuaria de Las Palmas 23 480 152 11 750 152 Izgradnja nove luke radi smanjenja preopterećenja luke Las Palmas 11 750 152 X 10 692 638 Država članica Luka Ispitani projekt Sadržaj projekta Kapacitet Poveza-Osta- nost lo zirano ostvare-nje1 Ponovno revidirani projekti 38 Italija Augusta luka Augusta 15 493 707 3 839 328 Izgradnja zgrada, pristaništa, ro-ro pristaništa, pločnika, prepreka, vanjskih sustava za dovršenje komercijalne luke Augusta 1 919 664 1 919 664 X 3 839 328 39 Campamento San Roque infrastructuras portuarias en las instalaciones de Campamento, San Roque 37 688 436 16 582 912 Obnova pristaništa i izgradnja 33,2 ha površine za terminal, od čega je novoizgrađeno 17,6 ha 16 582 912 X 16 582 912 Španjolska Ampliación del Puerto de Ferrol (puerto exterior)” – Korisnik: Autoridad Portuaria de Ferrol – San Cibrao („ponovna revizija”) Prilog II.
Annexes 76 1 2 Finding at the time of the audit visit. 
Prilozi 76 1 2 Rezultati u vrijeme revizije.
Annexes 77 Overview of non‐completed projects Member State Port concerned Non-completed project When was the project expected to end (initial date in the contract)? 
Prilozi 77 Pregled nedovršenih projekata Država članica Predmetna luka Nedovršeni projekt Kad je projekt trebao završiti (prvotni datum u ugovoru)?
How important is the delay compared to the initial set target (in months, as known now)? 
Koliko je kašnjenje bitno u usporedbi s prvotno određenim ciljem (u mjesecima, trenutačno stanje)?
EU-amount concerned (euros) Logistics and ports. 
Predmetna sredstva EU-a (u eurima) Logistika i luke.
Annexes 78 Main characteristics of Member States’ port systems, and overview of EU and EIB 1. 
Prilozi 78 Glavne karakteristike lučkih sustava država članica i pregled potpore EU-a i EIB-a za revidirana lučka područja (razdoblje 2000. – 2013.)1 1.
Germany Germany has about 21 seaports and about 250 inland ports. 
Njemačka U Njemačkoj postoji otprilike 21 morska luka i 250 pristaništa na unutarnjim vodama.
There is a division of responsibilities between Federal Government, the Federal States (Länder) and local authorities and other main port stakeholders (e.g. industry, trade unions) which makes it difficult to identify common goals and strategies. 
Odgovornost za njih podijeljena je između savezne vlade, saveznih zemalja (Länder) i lokalnih vlasti te ostalih glavnih lučkih dionika (npr. industrija, sindikati), što otežava utvrđivanje zajedničkih ciljeva i strategija.
The Federal Government is essentially responsible for establishing the regulatory transport framework plan and providing infrastructure links to and from seaports and inland ports (hinterland-connection), whereas the Federal States (and local authorities) are mainly responsible for the port infrastructure and industry and trade unions ensure port operations. 
Savezna vlada u osnovi je odgovorna za uspostavu plana regulatornog okvira za promet i pružanje infrastrukturnih veza do morskih luka i pristaništa na unutarnjim vodama (veza s područjem u zaleđu) i iz njih, dok su savezne zemlje (i lokalne vlasti) uglavnom odgovorne za lučku infrastrukturu i industriju, a sindikati osiguravaju lučke radnje.
The following main investments (structural funds) have been identified: support for the audited port areas (2000‐2013 period) 1 Annex IV million euros Amrum: EU: 0.3 Helgoland: EU: 11.3 Norddeich: EU: 1.6 Bensersiel: EU: 0.2 Emden: EU: 1.2 Wilhelmshaven: Brake: EU: 22.5 Hamburg: EU: 6.3 EIB: 225 Stade-Bützfleth: EU: 4.2 EU: 40.4 EIB: 325 0 100km Kreis Nordfriesland: EU: 0.3 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Hooge: EU: 0.8 Rendsburg: EU: 1.2 Kiel: EU: 6.5 Lübeck: Rostock: EU: 88.2 Cuxhaven: EU: 37.6 Bremerhaven: EU: 22.7 Wismar: EU: 23.7 EU: 20.8 EIB: 375.5 Flensburg: EU: 0.7 Stadt Barth: EU: 2 Stralsund: EU: 20.8 Sassnitz: EU: 19 Lubmin: EU: 34.3 1 Source: ECA compilation of Commission data and EIB publicly available data (website). 
Utvrđena su sljedeća glavna ulaganja (iz strukturnih fondova): Prilog IV. u milijunima eura Kreis Nordfriesland: EU: 0.3 Amrum: EU: 0.3 Helgoland: EU: 11.3 Norddeich: EU: 1.6 Bensersiel: EU: 0.2 Flensburg: EU: 0.7 Stadt Barth: EU: 2 Stralsund: EU: 20.8 Sassnitz: EU: 19 Lubmin: EU: 34.3 Emden: EU: 1.2 Wilhelmshaven: Brake: EU: 22.5 Hamburg: EU: 6.3 EIB: 225 Stade-Bützfleth: EU: 4.2 EU: 40.4 EIB: 325 0 100km Hooge: EU: 0.8 Rendsburg: EU: 1.2 Kiel: EU: 6.5 Lübeck: Rostock: EU: 88.2 Cuxhaven: EU: 37.6 Bremerhaven: EU: 22.7 Wismar: EU: 23.7 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 EU: 20.8 EIB: 375.5 1 Izvor: kompilacija Suda podataka Komisije i javno dostupnih podataka EIB-a (internetska stranica).
Annexes 79 2. 
Prilozi 79 2.
Spain Spain has one of the longest coastlines in Europe (8 000 km). 
Španjolska Španjolska obala jedna je od najdužih u Europi (8 000 km).
Its geographical location, being closest to the axis of one of the world’s major maritime routes, also strengthens its position as a strategic area in international shipping and a logistics platform in southern Europe. 
Njezin zemljopisni položaj, koji je najbliži osovini jednog od glavnih svjetskih pomorskih putova, također doprinosi njezinoj poziciji strateškog područja u međunarodnoj plovidbi i logističke platforme u južnoj Europi.
The State-owned Spanish Port System includes 46 ports of general interest, managed by 28 Port Authorities, whose investments; coordination and efficiency are monitored and managed by a government agency Puertos del Estado, a body depending on the Ministry of Public Works which is responsible for implementing the government’s port policy. 
Španjolski lučki sustav, koji je u vlasništvu države, obuhvaća 46 luka od općeg interesa, kojima upravlja 28 lučkih uprava, a čija ulaganja, koordinaciju i učinkovitost prati i njima upravlja vladina agencije Puertos del Estado, tijelo ovisno o Ministarstvu javnih radova, koje je odgovorno za provedbu vladine politike za luke.
Spain is the country that has invested most of the EU-money in its ports (almost 40 % of the entire EU amount). 
Španjolska je zemlja koja je uložila najviše novca EU-a u svoje luke (gotovo 40 % od ukupnog iznosa EU-a).
Annexes 80 3. 
Prilozi 80 3.
Italy The Italian ports system is fragmented. 
Italija Talijanski je lučki sustav rascjepkan.
It consists of a multitude of small ports characterised by scale inefficiency and limited market power vis-à-vis global terminal operators. 
Sastoji se od mnogo malih luka koje karakterizira razmjerna neučinkovitost i ograničena tržišna snaga u odnosu na globalne operatore terminala.
The Italian government has recently adopted a new law for port reform, amongst others, to merge ports located close to each other and their port authorities to rationalise the ports system, improve coordination, attract additional cargo and investments, and provide more financial autonomy. 
Talijanska vlada nedavno je donijela novi zakon o lučkoj reformi kojim se nalaže da se, između ostaloga, spoje luke koje se nalaze u neposrednoj blizini i da njihova lučka uprava racionalizira sustav luka, poboljša koordinaciju, privuče dodatan promet i ulaganja te osigura veću financijsku neovisnost.
Investments in the Southern part of the country were mainly from the cohesion policy funds, whereas the northern part was focusing on both EIB and TEN-T money. 
Ulaganja u južnom dijelu zemlje uglavnom su ostvarena iz fondova kohezijske politike, dok je sjeverni dio obuhvaćen sredstvima EIB-a i mreže TEN-T.
Annex IV million euros 0 100km Gioia Tauro: EU: 61.3 Messina: EU: 5 Catania: EU: 34.1 Augusta: EU: 50.3 Malta: EU: 4.2 Genova: EU: 12.3 EIB: 100 Savona: EIB: 109.7 € Venezia: EU: 6.5 Ravenna: EU: 3.1 EIB: 30 Livorno: EU: 0.7 Civitavecchia: EU: 0.6 NAPA ports cooperation: Rieka, Venezia, Trieste, Koper: EU: 18.4 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Port of Baia/Bacoli: EU: 0.2 Procida: EU: 0.4 Napoli: EU: 115.7 Port of Ischia: EU: 0.001 Torre del Greco: EU: 0.7 Salerno: EU: 167.4 Brindisi: EU: 25 Taranto: EU: 29 Acciaroli: EU: 3.6 Marina di Pisciotta: EU: 0.5 
Zabilježena su sljedeća ulaganja: Prilog IV. u milijunima eura 0 100km Gioia Tauro: EU: 61.3 Messina: EU: 5 Catania: EU: 34.1 Augusta: EU: 50.3 Malta: EU: 4.2 Genova: EU: 12.3 EIB: 100 Savona: EIB: 109.7 € Venezia: EU: 6.5 Ravenna: EU: 3.1 EIB: 30 Livorno: EU: 0.7 Civitavecchia: EU: 0.6 NAPA ports cooperation: Rieka, Venezia, Trieste, Koper: EU: 18.4 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Port of Baia/Bacoli: EU: 0.2 Procida: EU: 0.4 Napoli: EU: 115.7 Port of Ischia: EU: 0.001 Torre del Greco: EU: 0.7 Salerno: EU: 167.4 Brindisi: EU: 25 Taranto: EU: 29 Acciaroli: EU: 3.6 Marina di Pisciotta: EU: 0.5
Annexes 81 4. 
Prilozi 81 4.
Poland The 2007 ‘National Strategy on development of Polish ports by 2015’ had the objectives of improving the competitiveness of Polish ports, increasing their contribution to the socioeconomic development of the country and strengthening their significance within the international transport network. 
Poljska „Nacionalna strategija razvoja poljskih luka do 2015. godine” iz 2007. godine imala je za cilj poboljšanje konkurentnosti poljskih luka, povećanje njihova doprinosa društveno-gospodarskom razvoju zemlje i jačanje njihova značaja u okviru međunarodne prometne mreže.
Three ports were considered key for the functioning of the national economy: Gdańsk, Gdynia and Szczecin-Świnoujście. 
Tri su se luke smatrale ključnima za funkcioniranje nacionalnog gospodarstva: Gdanjsk, Gdynia i Szczecin-Świnoujście.
The bulk of the public investments therefore are concentrated on these three ports, and their connections to the international corridors, as follows: Annex IV million euros 0 500km Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Szczecin: EU: 163.9 Further investments called: “Polish sea”: EU: 47.9 Darlowo: EU: 4.95 Kołobrzeg: EU: 26.9 Gdynia: EU: 80.5 Gdansk: EU: 342.2 Elblag: EU: 7.4 mio € 
Najveći dio javnih ulaganja stoga je usmjeren na te tri luke i njihove veze s međunarodnim koridorima, i to na sljedeći način: Prilog IV. u milijunima eura 0 500km Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Szczecin: EU: 163.9 Further investments called: “Polish sea”: EU: 47.9 Darlowo: EU: 4.95 Kołobrzeg: EU: 26.9 Gdynia: EU: 80.5 Gdansk: EU: 342.2 Elblag: EU: 7.4 mio €
Annexes 82 5. 
Prilozi 82 5.
Sweden The Swedish law provides to the central state the management and financial responsibilities for the fairways outside, but leading to, the ports, and for the connections to the hinterland whereas the area within the port zone is the responsibility of the local or regional authority. 
Švedska Švedskim zakonom središnjoj su državi omogućeni upravljanje i financijska odgovornost za plovne putove koji se nalaze izvan luka, ali koji vode do njih, kao i za veze s područjem u zaleđu, pri čemu je područje unutar lučke zone odgovornost lokalne ili regionalne vlasti.
Since 2010, there is a global national investment plan for infrastructure projects for all transport modes in Sweden. 
Od 2010. godine za sve vrste prijevoza u Švedskoj postoji globalni nacionalni plan ulaganja za infrastrukturne projekte.
The plan covers the period 2010 to 2021, is updated every 4 years, and includes maritime transport, ports and fairways. 
Planom je obuhvaćeno razdoblje 2010. – 2021., ažurira se svake četiri godine te uključuje pomorski promet, luke i plovne putove.
For port infrastructure investments the port authorities, belonging to the local communes, decide and the state has no say in this because of the regional and local autonomy; whereas the dues for the fairways, managed by the Swedish Maritime Administration (SMA), are State responsibility. 
O ulaganjima u lučke infrastrukture odlučuju lučke uprave koje pripadaju lokalnim općinama, a država u tome nema pravo glasa zbog regionalne i lokalne samouprave, dok je za pristojbe za plovne putove kojima upravlja Švedska pomorska uprava (SMA) odgovorna država.
The following main EU and EIB investments were noted since 2000: Annex IV million euros Göteborg: EU: 5.6 EIB: 79 Malmö: EU: 6.9 Trelleborg: EU: 1.5, EIB: 48 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 Lake Malaren: EU: 2.8 Södertälje: EU: 0.6 Norrköping: EU: 3.5 Stockholm: EU: 14 Karlskrona: EU: 17 Lulea: EU: 3.7 0 700km 
Od 2000. godine zabilježena su sljedeća glavna ulaganja EU-a i EIB-a: Prilog IV. u milijunima eura Lake Malaren: EU: 2.8 Södertälje: EU: 0.6 Norrköping: EU: 3.5 Karlskrona: EU: 17 Malmö: EU: 6.9 Trelleborg: EU: 1.5, EIB: 48 Administrative boundaries: © EuroGeographics © EEA Stockholm: EU: 14 Göteborg: EU: 5.6 EIB: 79 Lulea: EU: 3.7 Cartography: Eurostat - GISCO, 04/2016 0 700km
28876 - allegations) 159 768 000 less then 50 % 35 000 000 C21/09 Port Authority of Piraeus 5 2011 6 2011 Latvia Ventspils a) construction of a dry cargo terminal; b) construction of berths c) construction of breakwater; d) dredging; e) construction of railroads; f) renovation of mooring jetties; g) fortification of the coast of the channel Unknown, for confidentiality reasons no figures provided 62.86 % 31 400 000 C39/09 (ex. 
Latvija Ventspils a) izgradnja terminala za suhi teret, b) izgradnja priveza, c) izgradnja lukobrana, d) jaružanje, e) izgradnja željezničkih pruga, f) obnova molova za privezivanje, g) utvrđenje obale kanala nepozna-to, zbog povjerljivosti nisu navedeni iznosi 62,86 % 31 400 000 C39/09 (ex.
358/09) Ventspils Port Authority 7 2011 Creation of a multimodal container hub 60 km from Rotterdam Sea terminal. 
358/09) Lučka uprava Ventspils 6 2011. 7 2011.
Ablasserdam container transferium Latvia Netherlands Krievu Sala Rotterdam Relocation of freeport Rigo from the city centre to the currently unused port area named Kirevu Sala allowing the expansion of the City of Riga 195 380 916 46 300 000 61.10 % 17.90 % 119 387 658 8 300 000 N 44/2010 SA 32224 Riga Freeport Authority no port project no port project Annex VI 
Latvija Nizozemska Krievu Sala Rotterdam Preseljenje slobodne luke Riga iz središta grada na lučko područje naziva Kirevu Sala, koje trenutačno nije u uporabi, što će omogućiti širenje grada Rige 195 380 916 46 300 000 61,10 % 17,90 % 119 387 658 8 300 000 N 44/2010 SA 32224 Lučka uprava slobodne luke Riga nema projekta za luke nema projekta za luke Izrada multimodalnoga kontejnerskog čvorišta 60 km od morskog terminala u Rotterdamu.
(PPA) Annex VI 
(PPA) 12 2013.
Annexes 86 State aid cases in Year Country Seaport concerned Type of good covered, infrastructure (l) and/or superstructure (S) Planned investment costs (in euros) Aid intensity Aid (in euros) Decision number Beneficiary sea ports 12 2013 Greece Katakolo a) Extension of windward pier (160 m); b) extension of existing quay in front of restaurants (63 m); c) additional works on existing pier (extension); d) construction of passenger reception building; e) extension/ renovation old warehouse; f) construction of an open air-theatre; g) reconstruction of surrounding areas and public spaces; h) construction of port traffic and passport-control building 12 265 965 91.23 % 11 190 240 SA.35738 Pygros Municipal Port Fund (PMPF) 13 2013 Spain Santa Cruz de Tenerife a) works for sheltering the harbour (protection and reinforcement of northern side of th quay and external breakwater (128 million euros); b) counter breakwater to protect southern side of the quay (27.8 million euros); c) commercial areas for storage solid bulk and containers (86.8 million euros); d) restauration of the nearby natural reserve (phase 1) (0.6 million euros) 243 800 000 27.48 % 67 000 000 SA.36223 Port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife and Ley de Puertos del Estado y de la Marina Mercante (LEPEYMM) 14 2013 Poland Polish ports superstructures Modification of the aid scheme N 546/2008 - Investment aid for the development of intermodal transport under Infrastructure and Environmental Operational Programme (budget increase from 111 million to approx. 
Grčka Katakolo a) proširenje mola u smjeru protiv vjetra (160 m), b) proširenje postojećeg pristaništa ispred restorana (63 m), c) dodatni radovi na postojećem molu (proširenje), d) izgradnja zgrade za prijam putnika, e) proširenje/obnova starog skladišta, f) izgradnja kazališta na otvorenome, g) izgradnja okolnih područja i javnih prostora, h) izgradnja zgrade za kontrolu lučkog prometa i putovnica 12 265 965 91,23 % 11 190 240 SA.35738 Fond općinske luke Pigros (PMPF) u vezi sa sigurnosti (KKIKT): 21,335 milijuna eura) Prilog VI. Prilozi 86 Slučajevi državnih potpora u morskim lukama Godina Zemlja Predmetna morska luka Vrsta obuhvaćene robe, infrastrukture (l) i/ ili nadgrađa (N) Planirani troškovi ulaganja (u eurima) Intenzitet potpore Potpora (u eurima) Broj odluke Korisnik 13 2013.
170 million euros) due to the substantial need for modernising and investing in intermodal infrastructure in Poland. (port infrastructure will be especially targeted). a) intermodal transport: construction of logistic centres and container terminals, storage and handling facilities, internal roads and railways, water supply, electronic equipment; 170 000 000 50 % for port and intermodal infrastructure; 30 % for information and communication equipment SA.36485 Aid is available to enterprises from EU Member States who perform or intend to perform intermodal transportation operations in Poland - such as operators of container terminals and logistics centres - with the exclusion of undertakings in financial difficulties and undertakings from whom the Commission has ordered the recovery of aid, as long as the aid has not been fully recovered. 15 2013 Italy Capo d’Orlando Breakwater dock, dredging, mooring, touristic infrastructure 48.71 % 20 020 000 SA.36621 b) internal transport network within ports (roads, railways, underground passages, parking lots, storage yards; telecommunication systems. 
Poljska Nadgrađe poljskih luka sa 111 milijuna eura na približno 170 milijuna eura) zbog znatne potrebe za modernizacijom intermodalne infrastrukture u Poljskoj i ulaganjem u nju (poseban cilj bit će lučka infrastruktu-ra). a) Intermodalni promet: izgradnja logističkih centara i kontejnerskih terminala, objekata za skladištenje i rukovanje, unutarnjih cesta i željezničke pruge, vodoopskrbe, elektroničke opreme, b) interna prometna mreža unutar luka (ceste, željezničke pruge, podzemni prolazi, parkirališta, skladišna dvorišta, telekomunikacijski sustavi). 170 000 000 SA.36485 15 2013. Italija Capo d’Orlando lukobran, dok, jaružanje, privezivanje, turistička infrastruktura 48,71 % 20 020 000 SA.36621 Izmjena sustava državnih potpora N 546/2008 – potpora za ulaganja za razvoj intermodalnog prometa u okviru operativnog programa za infrastrukturu i okoliš (povećanje proračuna 50 % za lučku i intermodalnu infrastrukturu, 30 % za informacijsku i komunikacijsku opremu Potpore su dostupne poduzećima iz država članica EU-a koje vrše ili namjeravaju vršiti radnje intermodalnog prijevoza u Poljskoj, kao što su operatori kontejnerskih terminala i logističkih centara, ne uključujući poduzeća u financijskim teškoćama te poduzeća od kojih je Komisija zatražila povrat potpora, ako potpora nije u potpunosti vraćena.
40838 Port Authority of the Free Port of Ventspils 22 2015 23 2015 Expansion of the Port of Calais and build a new cross Channel terminal to allow better operation of cross-Channel sea transport services Germany France Sassnitz Calais Extension of the port by constructing a new berth (No 10) to optimise the use of berths 8 and 9 5 100 000 887 500 000 88.68 % 30.40 % 4 523 000 270 000 000 SA.41865 SA.39688 Fährhafen Sassnitz GmbH Port de Calais Italy Taranto Dredging and disposal of dredging materials due to inadequacy of the infrastructure to accomodate increasingly larger container ships 83 000 000 54 % 38 158 587 SA.39542 Port Authority of Taranto a) upgrading of the port of Patras (5th pier); b) road and rainwater drain works; c) Terminal building 1; d) Terminal building 2; e) Auxiliary building, Patras Port Authority S.A. 
2015. Njemačka Francuska Sassnitz Calais Proširenje luke izgradnjom novog priveza (br. Italija Taranto Jaružanje i zbrinjavanje materijala nastalog jaružanjem zbog neodgovarajuće infrastrukture za prihvat sve većih kontejnerskih brodova 83 000 000 54 % 38 158 587 SA.39542 Lučka uprava Taranto a) nadogradnja luke Patras (5. mol), b) radovi na cesti i odvodu kišnice, c) izgradnja 1. terminala, d) izgradnja 2. terminala, e) pomoćna zgrada Lučka uprava Patras S.A.
Reply of the Commission 89 Executive summary III First indent The Commission notes that the TEN-T Regulation and the Core Network Corridor Work Plans foresee the developing of strategies at EU level so as to ensure that European priorities are taken into consideration for port developments. 
Odgovori 89 Komisije Sažetak III Prva alineja Komisija primjećuje kako Uredba o TEN-T-u i planovi rada za koridor osnovne mreže predviđaju razvijanje strategija na razini EU-a kako bi se osiguralo uzimanje europskih prioriteta u obzir pri razvitku luka.
The TEN-T Regulation provides for an EU-wide infrastructure planning since 2013 by establishing a Core and Comprehensive networks associated with technical standards and implementation deadlines. 
Uredbom o TEN-T-u predviđa se infrastrukturno planiranje koje pokriva cijeli EU uspostavljanjem osnovne i sveobuhvatne mreže povezane s tehničkim standardima i provedbenim rokovima.
This regulation results from the analysis of the traffic volumes of EU seaports. 
Ta je Uredba rezultat analize opsega prometa u morskim lukama EU-a.