natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, upon availability of political commitment, and better absorption capacity, the Commission should better target resources in key areas of the rule of law where we noted a significant need for support: the fight against corruption and organised crime (with a particular focus on the public prosecution) and media freedom. 
Nadalje, na temelju postojanja političke predanosti i povećanog kapaciteta iskorištavanja sredstava, Komisija bi trebala usmjeriti sredstva na ključna područja vladavine prava u kojima smo uočili znatnu potrebu za potporom, a to su borba protiv korupcije i organiziranog kriminala (uz poseban naglasak na državnom odvjetništvu) te sloboda medija.
73 Enhancing regional cooperation and strengthening administrative capacity in the region as a whole is of high importance and has been encouraged by the Commission, notably through the Western Balkans Investment Framework (paragraphs 19, 39, and 55). 
73 Poboljšanje regionalne suradnje i jačanje administrativnih kapaciteta u cijeloj regiji vrlo su važni te ih je Komisija poticala, posebice preko Okvira za ulaganja na zapadnom Balkanu (odlomci 19., 39. i 55.).
74 However, during the period audited, the Regional Cooperation Council did not have a significant impact on the ground. 
74 Međutim, tijekom razdoblja obuhvaćenog revizijom Vijeće za regionalnu suradnju nije imalo znatan učinak na terenu.
For the Regional School of Public Administration, it was too early to establish whether it improved administrative capacity in the Western Balkans (paragraphs 39, 45 and 57). 
Kad je riječ o Regionalnoj školi za javnu upravu, bilo je prerano za utvrđivanje jesu li se s pomoću nje povećali administrativni kapaciteti na zapadnom Balkanu (odlomci 39., 45. i 57.).
Recommendation 4 Regional cooperation Under IPA I and II, the Commission should support regional cooperation. 
4. preporuka Regionalna suradnja Komisija bi u okviru IPA-e I i IPA-e II trebala podržati regionalnu suradnju.
In particular, it should ensure that its financial contributions to the RCC and ReSPA yield measurable and sustainable results on the ground. 
Osobito bi trebala zajamčiti da njezini financijski doprinosi Vijeću za regionalnu suradnju i Regionalnoj školi za javnu upravu donesu mjerljive i održive rezultate na terenu.
Conclusions and recommendations 43 75 The political dialogue in the Western Balkans had a limited impact on the rule of law in a number of cases. It did achieve some progress with regard to public administration reform (paragraphs 59 to 64). 
Zaključci i preporuke 43 75 Politički dijalog na zapadnom Balkanu imao je u nizu slučajeva ograničen učinak na vladavinu prava, no njime je ipak ostvaren određen napredak u pogledu reforme javne uprave (odlomci 59.–64.).
Recommendation 5 Political dialogue The Commission should use political dialogue to support the delivery of results pertaining to the rule of law and public administration reform under the IPA. 
5. preporuka Politički dijalog Komisija bi se trebala koristiti političkim dijalogom kako bi pružila potporu postizanju rezultata u području vladavine prava i reforme javne uprave u okviru IPA-e.
This report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mr Karel PINXTEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 12 July 2016. 
Ovo je izvješće usvojilo III. revizijsko vijeće, kojim predsjeda član Revizorskog suda Karel PINXTEN, na sastanku održanom u Luxembourgu 12. srpnja 2016.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President 
Za Europski revizorski sud Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA Predsjednik
Annexes 44 Key events for understanding EU–Western Balkan relations 2000 ο 1 June – The Santa Maria da Feira European Council states that all the countries involved in an SAA process are potential candidates for EU membership. 
Prilozi 44 Ključni događaji za shvaćanje odnosa između EU-a i zapadnog Balkana 2000. ο 1. lipnja – U Santa Maria de Feiri Europsko vijeće izjavljuje da su sve zemlje uključene u postupak provedbe Sporazuma o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju potencijalne kandidatkinje za članstvo u EU-u.
2001 ο 1 April – Former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic, wanted on charges of war crimes, abuse of power and corruption, is arrested. ο 13 August – The Ohrid Framework Agreement seals the peace deal between the government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the country’s ethnic Albanian community. 
2001. ο 1. travnja – Uhićen je Slobodan Milošević, bivši jugoslavenski predsjednik, optužen za ratne zločine, zlouporabu ovlasti i korupciju. ο 13. kolovoza – Ohridskim okvirnim sporazumom sklopljen je mirovni dogovor između vlade bivše jugoslavenske republike Makedonije i albanske zajednice u toj zemlji.
2003 ο 20 June – The Thessaloniki European Council confirms the EU perspective for the Western Balkans. 
2003. ο 20. lipnja – Na sastanku Europskog vijeća u Solunu potvrđena je perspektiva EU-a za zapadni Balkan.
2004 ο 22 March – The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia applies for EU membership. ο 1 April – The SAA with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia enters into force 2005 ο 16 December – The Council confirms the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as a candidate country. 
2004. ο 22. ožujka – Bivša jugoslavenska republika Makedonija podnosi zahtjev za članstvo u EU-u. ο 1. travnja – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen s bivšom jugoslavenskom republikom Makedonijom stupa na snagu. 2005. ο 16. prosinca – Vijeće potvrđuje da je bivša jugoslavenska republika Makedonija zemlja kandidatkinja.
2006 ο 3 June – After a successful referendum, Montenegro declares its independence. 
2006. ο 3. lipnja – Crna Gora proglašava svoju neovisnost nakon uspješnog referenduma.
2007 ο 1 January – IPA I enters into force ο 26 February – In Bosnia and Herzegovina vs. Serbia and Montenegro, the ICJ rules that the Srebrenica massacre was an act of genocide, whilst clearing the respondent for responsibility for the massacre. 
2007. ο 1. siječnja – IPA I stupa na snagu. ο 26. veljače – U predmetu Bosna i Hercegovina protiv Srbije i Crne Gore Međunarodni sud donosi presudu da je masakr u Srebrenici bio genocidni čin, iako je tuženika oslobodio odgovornosti za masakr.
2008 ο 17 February – Kosovo declares its independence. ο 11 July – At the donors’ conference for Kosovo, the Commission and EU Member States pledge nearly 800 million euros to specifically support Kosovo. ο 15 December – Montenegro applies for EU membership. 
2008. ο 17. veljače – Kosovo proglašava svoju neovisnost. ο 11. srpnja – Na konferenciji donatora za Kosovo Komisija i države članice EU-a obvezuju se da će dati gotovo 800 milijuna eura za potporu Kosovu. ο 15. prosinca – Crna Gora podnosi zahtjev za članstvo u EU-u.
2009 ο 1 April – The SAA with Albania enters into force. ο 24 April – Albania applies for EU membership. ο 22 December – Serbia applies for EU membership. ο 22 December – The ECHR condemns Bosnia and Herzegovina for the violation of the democratic rights of citizens of non-majority communities. 
2009. ο 1. travnja – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen s Albanijom stupa na snagu. ο 24. travnja – Albanija podnosi zahtjev za članstvo u EU-u. ο 22. prosinca – Srbija podnosi zahtjev za članstvo u EU-u. ο 22. prosinca – Europski sud za ljudska prava osuđuje Bosnu i Hercegovinu za povredu demokratskih prava građana iz manjinskih zajednica.
2010 ο 1 May – The SAA with Montenegro enters into force. ο 22 July – The ICJ issues an advisory opinion that the unilateral declaration of Kosovo’s independence did not violate any applicable rule of international law. ο 17 December – The Council confirms Montenegro as a candidate country. 
2010. ο 1. svibnja – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen s Crnom Gorom stupa na snagu. ο 22. srpnja – Međunarodni sud izdaje savjetodavno mišljenje da jednostranim proglašenjem neovisnosti Kosova nije povrijeđeno nijedno primjenjivo pravilo međunarodnog prava. ο 17. prosinca – Vijeće potvrđuje da je Crna Gora zemlja kandidatkinja.
2011 ο 26 May and 20 July – prominent Serb war criminals sought by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia are arrested. 
2011. ο 26. svibnja i 20. srpnja – Uhićeni su istaknuti srpski ratni zločinci za kojima je tragao Međunarodni kazneni sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju.
Annexes 45 2012 ο 1 March – The European Council confirms Serbia as a candidate country. ο 29 June – Montenegro’s accession negotiations formally start. 
Prilozi 45 2012. ο 1. ožujka – Europsko vijeće potvrđuje da je Srbija zemlja kandidatkinja. ο 29. lipnja – Službeno počinju pristupni pregovori s Crnom Gorom.
2013 ο 19 April – The Prime Ministers of Kosovo and Serbia sign the Brussels Agreement, normalising relations between the two countries. ο 1 September – The SAA with Serbia enters into force. 
2013. ο 19. travnja – Premijeri Kosova i Srbije potpisuju Briselski sporazum, kojim su normalizirani odnosi između dviju zemalja. ο 1. rujna – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen sa Srbijom stupa na snagu.
2014 ο 1 January – IPA II enters into force ο 21 January – Serbia’s accession negotiations formally start. ο 27 June – The Council confirms Albania as a candidate country. ο 15 July – Declaration by the incoming President of the Commission that no new accessions will take place before 2020. ο 28 August – Western Balkans Summit in Berlin. 
2014. ο 1. siječnja – IPA II stupa na snagu. ο 21. siječnja – Službeno počinju pristupni pregovori sa Srbijom. ο 27. lipnja – Vijeće potvrđuje da je Albanija zemlja kandidatkinja. ο 15. srpnja – Budući predsjednik Komisije izjavljuje da prije 2020. godine neće doći do novog proširenja. ο 28. kolovoza – Sastanak na vrhu o zapadnom Balkanu održan u Berlinu.
2015 ο 1 June – The SAA with Bosnia and Herzegovina enters into force. ο 20 August – Western Balkans Summit in Vienna. 
2015. ο 1. lipnja – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen s Bosnom i Hercegovinom stupa na snagu. ο 20. kolovoza – Sastanak na vrhu o zapadnom Balkanu održan u Beču.
2016 ο 15 February – Bosnia and Herzegovina applies for EU membership. ο 30 March – Western Balkans Summit in Durrës, Albania. ο 1 April – The SAA with Kosovo enters into force. 
2016. ο 15. veljače – Bosna i Hercegovina podnosi zahtjev za članstvo u EU-u. ο 30. ožujka – Sastanak na vrhu o zapadnom Balkanu održan u Draču (Albanija). ο 1. travnja – Sporazum o stabilizaciji i pridruživanju sklopljen s Kosovom stupa na snagu.
Source: ECA, on the basis of European Commission data. 
Izvor: Sud na temelju podataka Europske komisije.
Annexes 47 No Beneficiary Project IPA decision year Amount (euro) Rule of law 23 24 Montenegro Support to the implementation of the anti-corruption strategy and action plan Corruption in local government – zero tolerance! 
4. Crna Gora Support to the implementation of the anti-corruption strategy and action plan (Potpora provedbi strategije i akcijskom planu za borbu protiv korupcije) Corruption in local government – zero tolerance!
2012 2012 700 000 190 308 25 26 27 28 29 Serbia Police reform: internal affairs Improvement of efficiency and transparency of the judiciary system (courts) Fight against corruption Improvement of transparency and efficiency (prosecutors and penal system) Support for civil society (I and II) 2007 2007 2008 2008 2007 2008 1 000 000 2 643 064 2 147 000 1 891 517 1 983 458 TOTAL 60 161 522 Public administrative reform 1 2 3 4 5 Albania Support for the Albanian Department of Public Administration (DOPA) Support for the Albanian public procurement, concessions and public auctions systems Strengthening the Assembly of Albania Support for the Albanian Customs Administration Implementation of a modern Financial Management and Control System and Public Financial Inspection 2008 2008 2010 2011 2012 958 892 899 076 1 454 147 1 424 496 2 500 000 6 7 8 9 10 Bosnia and Herzegovina Capacity building of the Office of the Coordinator for Public Administration Reform Development and implementation of a nationwide public internal financial control strategy Capacity Building of General Government and Public Finance Statistics Curricula for transparency and accountability Support for coordination and Implementation of Public Administration Reform 2007 2007 2009 2010 2011 1 824 961 1 105 904 1 603 790 445 253 476 450 Annex II 
7. 8. 9.
Annexes 48 No Beneficiary Project IPA decision year Amount (euro) Public administrative reform 11 12 13 14 the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Technical assistance for the IPA training and support facility Strengthening the capacity of institutions to manage and implement operational programmes Support for the Public Procurement System Technical Assistance to the Ministry of Information Society and Administration and Strengthening the implementation of the National System for Training Coordination 2007 2008 2008 2009 856 280 1 599 710 986 442 1 095 000 15 16 17 18 19 Montenegro Further development and strengthening of the public procurement system Strengthening the management and control systems for EU financial assistance Strengthening State Audit Institution Audit Quality control in the State Audit Institution Strengthening the management of EU funds and general administrative procedures 2009 2009 2010 2013 2014 2014 2014 1 080 017 2 000 000 751 068 250 000 1 261 500 20 21 22 23 Serbia Municipal support programme Support for the Public Procurement Office Support for the development of Public Internal Financial Control Harmonisation of the Customs Enforcement Division with the standards, organisation and operational methodology of EU enforcement agencies 2007 2007 2008 2008 22 501 150 116 650 2 000 000 1 399 641 TOTAL 48 590 427 Source: ECA on the basis of European Commission data, 30 June 2015. 
4. 5. 8.
Annexes 49 Audit sample of IPA I regional programmes Source: ECA on the basis of European Commission data, 30 June 2015. 
Prilozi 49 Revizijski uzorak regionalnih programa IPA-e I Izvor: Sud na temelju podataka Europske komisije, 30. lipnja 2015.
Contracted amounts represent the total contracted amounts for all projects in these programmes. 
Ugovoreni iznosi čine ukupne ugovorene iznose za sve projekte u tim programima.
Reply of 50 the Commission Executive summary VIII The Commission would like to point out that conditionality has been applied, where appropriate, and at the appropriate level, to achieve the maximum possible impact of the enlargement policy objectives, in often difficult political contexts. 
Odgovori 50 Komisije Sažetak VIII Komisija bi željela istaknuti da je, prema potrebi i na prikladnoj razini, primijenila uvjetovanje radi ostvarenja najvećeg mogućeg utjecaja ciljeva politike proširenja u često teškom političkom kontekstu.
With regard to funding levels, the Commission would like to point out that the funding provided in the relevant sectors was appropriate, given the relatively limited amount of large-scale investments required and the limits posed by the existing absorption capacity. 
U vezi s razinama financiranja, Komisija bi željela istaknuti da je financiranje u relevantnim sektorima bilo primjereno, s obzirom na relativno ograničen broj potrebnih velikih ulaganja te na ograničenja postojećeg apsorpcijskog kapaciteta.
Media freedom, civil society and the fight against corruption and organised crime require primarily the provision of expert advice through technical assistance, which was ensured through IPA, and not large-scale investment. 
Sloboda medija, civilno društvo i borba protiv korupcije i organiziranog kriminala ne zahtijevaju velika ulaganja, nego prvenstveno pružanje stručnih savjeta putem tehničke pomoći koja je osigurana u okviru programa IPA.
X The Commission would like to stress that the Regional Cooperation Council has primarily been set up by the countries in the region as a forum to meet and discuss common challenges and that this objective has been met. 
X Komisija želi naglasiti da su Vijeće za regionalnu suradnju prvenstveno osnovale zemlje te regije kao forum za sastanke i raspravu o zajedničkim izazovima te da je taj cilj ostvaren.
Introduction 09 The Commission would like to underline that the enlargement process is a strict but fair process built on established criteria and lessons learned from the past. 
Uvod 09 Komisija želi naglasiti da je proces proširenja strog, ali pravedan proces koji se temelji na utvrđenim kriterijima i poukama iz prošlosti.
Each country is assessed on the basis of its own merit. 
Svaka zemlja ocjenjuje se na temelju vlastitih zasluga.
The challenges faced by the current enlargement countries are such that none will be ready to join the EU during the mandate of the current Commission, which will expire towards the end of 2019. 
Izazovi s kojima se suočavaju sadašnje zemlje proširenja takvi su da ni jedna neće biti spremna pristupiti EU-u tijekom mandata aktualne Komisije koji istječe krajem 2019.
The Council in December 2015 reiterated that enlargement remains a key policy of the EU and reiterated the EU’s unequivocal commitment to the European perspective of the Western Balkans. 
Vijeće je u prosincu 2015. ponovilo da proširenje ostaje ključna politika EU-a i ponovilo nedvosmislenu predanost EU-a europskoj perspektivi Zapadnog Balkana.
Observations 23 The Commission would like to point out that all countries have strategies in the area of the rule of law. 
Opažanja 23 Komisija bi željela istaknuti da sve zemlje imaju strategiju u području vladavine prava.
However, not all may have an overarching or updated strategy in the justice sector. 
Međutim, sve možda i nemaju glavnu ili ažurnu strategiju u pravosudnom sektoru.
Box 4 — Experience with decentralising management under IPA I The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The Commission would like to highlight that in order to mitigate the risk of further losses of projects, the procedure for the review of contractual documents has been improved and is more selective in decentralising funds under IPA II. 
Okvir 4. – Iskustvo s decentraliziranjem upravljanja u okviru IPA-e I Bivša jugoslavenska republika Makedonija Komisija bi htjela naglasiti da je radi smanjenja rizika od daljeg gubitka projekata poboljšan postupak revizije ugovornih dokumenata i selektivnija je decentralizacija sredstava u okviru programa IPA II.
The Commission also closely monitors the procurement plans prepared by the national authorities and advises on the prioritisation of projects. 
Usto, Komisija pozorno prati planove nabave koje pripremaju državna tijela i pruža savjete u vezi s određivanjem prioriteta među projektima.
Moreover, the Commission monitors the implementation of the DIS action plan prepared by the national authorities to address any issues related to the implementation of IPA. 
Usto, Komisija prati provedbu akcijskog plana za decentralizirani sustav provedbe koji su izradila nacionalna nadležna tijela u cilju rješavanja svih pitanja povezanih s provedbom programa IPA.
Reply of the Commission 51 Box 4 — Experience with decentralising management under IPA I Serbia The purpose of the decentralised implementation system (DIS) under IPA I was the management of IPA funds by national authorities. 
Odgovori Komisije 51 Okvir 4. – Iskustvo s decentraliziranjem upravljanja u okviru IPA-e I Srbija Svrha decentraliziranog sustava primjene u okviru programa IPA I bila je omogućiti nacionalnim tijelima upravljanje sredstvima iz programa IPA.
The accreditation process, therefore, did not entail a comprehensive assessment of the public finance management at the country level, which was incorporated only in the IPA II legal framework. 
Stoga postupak akreditacije nije podrazumijevao sveobuhvatnu ocjenu upravljanja javnim financijama na razini države. To je bilo ugrađeno tek u pravni okvir programa IPA II.
It should be noted that in the case of Serbia, the Commission continued to monitor the DIS structures by following up any outstanding issues and taking any corrective measures. 
Treba napomenuti da je u slučaju Srbije Komisija nastavila nadzirati strukture decentraliziranog sustava primjene praćenjem svih neriješenih pitanja i poduzimanjem korektivnih mjera.
For instance, in 2015, due to the persistent weaknesses in one of the key structures (Audit Authority) the Commission decided to suspend the Conferral, given that the system did not guarantee the appropriate use of EU funds. 
Primjerice, u 2015. zbog postojanih nedostataka u jednoj od ključnih struktura (revizijsko tijelo) Komisija je odlučila obustaviti dodjeljivanje, s obzirom na to da sustav nije jamčio odgovarajuću uporabu fondova EU-a.
28 The Commission would like to point out that conditionality has been applied, where appropriate, and at the appropriate level, to achieve the maximum possible impact of the enlargement policy objectives, in often difficult political contexts. 
28 Komisija bi željela istaknuti da je, prema potrebi i na prikladnoj razini, primijenila uvjetovanje radi ostvarenja najvećeg mogućeg utjecaja ciljeva politike proširenja u često teškom političkom kontekstu.
They are clearly defined in sector/project fiches in a measurable way and are enforced during implementation. 
Uvjeti su jasno definirani u sektor-skim/projektnim sažecima, mjerljivi su i primjenjuju se tijekom provedbe.
This is to ensure that only mature projects (actions) are financed. 
Time se osigurava da se financiraju samo zreli projekti (djelovanja).
Numerous projects have been postponed in programming, where critical preconditions were not in place. 
Brojni su projekti odgođeni u programiranju jer ključni preduvjeti nisu bili ispunjeni.
36 The Commission partially agrees. 
36 Komisija se djelomično slaže.
As a general policy, the Commission systematically follows up on all evaluations, notably through a detailed table of recommendations and follow-up actions. 
Kao opće politike Komisija sustavno prati sve evaluacije, posebno detaljnom tablicom s preporukama i aktivnostima praćenja.
The Commission would also like to point out that result oriented monitoring (ROM) is based on generic questions which may be used for all countries and/or sectors. 
Komisija bi željela istaknuti i da se praćenje usmjereno na rezultate (ROM) temelji na generičkim pitanjima koja se mogu upotrijebiti za sve zemlje i/ili sektore.
However, experts with the relevant targeted experience can be used to provide a more balanced view. 
No stručnjaci s odgovarajućim ciljanim iskustvom mogli bi pružiti uravnoteženiji stav.
37 The Commission points out that a comprehensive strategic evaluation of PAR is currently ongoing. 
37 Komisija ističe da je trenutačno u tijeku sveobuhvatno strateško ocjenjivanje PAR-a.
Box 7 — Regional donor coordination in the Western Balkans RCC The Commission would like to note that the RCC organised several sector-related discussions at regional level, including a dedicated donor coordination meeting. 
Okvir 7. – Regionalna koordinaciju donatora na zapadnom Balkanu RCC Komisija želi napomenuti da je RCC organizirao nekoliko sektorskih rasprava na regionalnoj razini, uključujući poseban sastanak za koordinaciju donatora.
These actions have contributed to providing a regional perspective in donor assistance. 
Tim se mjerama donatorskoj pomoći osigurala regionalna perspektiva.
The RCC has built a donor database (SEEDAD). 
RCC je sastavio bazu podataka donatora (SEEDAD).
A beta version was finalised in December 2015 and the database was presented to the donor community at the donor coordination meeting held in March 2016 (http://www.rcc.int/seedad). 
Beta-verzija dovršena je u prosincu 2015. i baza podataka predstavljena je donatorskoj zajednici na sastanku za koordinaciju donatora u ožujku 2016. (http://www.rcc.int/seedad/)
Reply of the Commission 52 40 Despite some shortcomings in the donor coordination process on the part of the national authorities, due to the support provided by the Commission and the EU Delegations, this did not have an impact on the correct implementation of the IPA financial assistance. 
Odgovori Komisije 52 40 Unatoč nekim nedostacima procesa u kojem su nacionalna tijela koordinirala donatore, zahvaljujući potpori Komisije i delegacija EU-a, to nije naštetilo pravilnoj provedbi financijske pomoći iz programa IPA.