natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to create more transparency, Parliament will provide a detailed overview of the financing of the KAD II building project in its annual financial management report which is submitted to the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Bureau as well as published in the Official Journal. 
Parlament će u cilju veće transparentnosti u svojem godišnjem izvješću o financijskom upravljanju, koje se podnosi Odboru za proračune, Odboru za proračunski nadzor i Predsjedništvu te objavljuje u Službenom listu, ponuditi detaljan pregled financiranja građevinskog projekta KAD II.
Recommendation 4 The recommendation is accepted. 
Preporuka 4. Preporuka se prihvaća.
Parliament has analysed the different lessons learned from previous projects and always aims at putting in place the most adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects. 
Parlament je analizirao različite lekcije naučene iz prethodnih projekata i uvijek nastoji primjenjivati upravljačke procese na način najprimjereniji velikim građevinskim projektima i projektima obnove.
The Martens, Havel and House of European History projects were concluded successfully. 
Projekti Martens, Havel i Kuća europske povijesti uspješno su završeni.
Measures in the context of the KAD II project include the introduction of lean management and a reinforced partnership with Luxembourgish authorities. 
Mjere poduzete u okviru projekta KAD II obuhvaćaju uvođenje racionalnog upravljanja i pojačano partnerstvo s luksemburškim vlastima.
This partnership, additional internal resources and an efficient financial structure avoided that project delays resulted in additional cost (see the reply to paragraph 50). 
Zahvaljujući tom partnerstvu, dodatnim internim resursima i učinkovitoj financijskoj strukturi izbjegnuti su dodatni troškovi zbog kašnjenja projekta (vidi odgovor na točku 50.).
See the replies to paragraphs 58 and 60. 
Vidi odgovore na točke 58. i 60.
Recommendation 5 The recommendation is accepted. 
Preporuka 5. Preporuka se prihvaća.
Further improvements are scheduled, including the introduction of specific IT tools. 
Već su planirana daljnja poboljšanja, uključujući uvođenje posebnih informatičkih alata.
A Master Plan 2019 for office management was developed. 
Pripremljen je glavni plan za 2019. za upravljanje uredskim prostorom.
Parliament is currently developing a system of lead indicators. 
Parlament trenutačno razvija sustav glavnih pokazatelja.
Parliament welcomes the recommendation of monitoring the efficiency of buildings portfolio of all institutions on a harmonised basis taking into account the particularities of each institution as well as the limitations of the Treaties. 
Parlament pozdravlja preporuku da se učinkovitost portfelja nekretnina svih institucija prati na usklađen način vodeći računa o posebnosti svake institucije i o ograničenjima iz Ugovorâ.
Replies of the Council of the European Union Inter-institutional cooperation is extensive 21. 
Odgovor Vijeća Europske unije Međuinstitucijska suradnja intenzivna je 21.
The Council is aware of the impact the inter-institutional call for tenders could have on the participation of SMEs. 
Vijeće je svjesno učinka koji bi međuinstitucijski poziv na podnošenje ponuda mogao imati na sudjelovanje MSP-a.
The decision to propose or associate itself with an inter-institutional project takes into consideration such implications and, whenever possible, the Council encourages the participation of SMEs in calls for tenders. 
Odlukom o predlaganju međuinstitucijskog projekta ili pridruživanju njemu takve se posljedice uzimaju u obzir te Vijeće, kad god je to moguće, potiče sudjelovanje MSP-a u pozivima na podnošenje ponuda.
Financing mechanisms of large construction projects are often complex thereby affecting budgetary transparency 38. 
Mehanizmi za financiranje velikih građevinskih projekata često su složeni, čime se utječe na transparentnost proračuna 38.
The last construction project conducted by the Council was the Europa building project, which envisaged a simple financing method. 
Posljednji građevinski projekt Vijeća bio je projekt izgradnje zgrade Europa, za koji je bila predviđena jednostavna metoda financiranja.
The Belgian state would lead and pay for the project whilst the Council would reimburse the amount to the state, by means of deferred payments. 
Belgijska država vodila bi i platila projekt, a Vijeće bi nadoknadilo iznos državi postupkom kupnje s odgodom plaćanja.
The Council partially agrees with the ECA's observation; nevertheless, this practice resulted in considerable savings in terms of interest in the case of the Europa building project, estimated at EUR 23 million (amount resulting from the difference between the total amount to be paid in case of deferred payments and the actual amount to be paid). 
Vijeće se djelomično slaže s opažanjem Europskog revizorskog suda. Ipak, ta je praksa dovela do znatnih ušteda u pogledu kamata u slučaju projekta izgradnje zgrade Europa, procijenjenih na 23 milijuna EUR (iznos dobiven razlikom između ukupnog iznosa koji treba platiti u slučaju odgode plaćanja i stvarnog iznosa koji treba platiti).
The practice is compliant with the Financial Regulation. 
Ta je praksa u skladu s Financijskom uredbom.
The Council's Europa project: within budget but delayed 46. 
Projekt Vijeća za zgradu Europa: unutar proračuna, ali uz kašnjenje 46.
The Council reacted to these shortcomings by putting together a team of professionals and project managers who managed to keep risks, deadlines and the budget under control. 
Vijeće je na te nedostatke odgovorilo uspostavom tima stručnjaka i voditelja projekata koji su uspjeli zadržati rizike, rokove i proračun pod kontrolom.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1. 
Zaključci i preporuke Preporuka 1.
The Council accepts the recommendation. 
Vijeće prihvaća preporuku.
The building strategy will be formalised and the planning documents will be updated regularly. 
Građevinska strategija bit će formalizirana, a dokumenti o planiranju redovito će se ažurirati.
Recommendation 2. 
Preporuka 2.
A pilot phase is scheduled for 2019 and a Steering Committee has been appointed and mandated to assess the costs, risks and benefits of implementing the programme in the Council and to make recommendations to the Secretary-General regarding further implementation. 
Pilot-faza predviđena je za 2019. te je imenovan upravljački odbor s mandatom da procijeni troškove, rizike i koristi provedbe programa u Vijeću i pruži preporuke glavnom tajniku u pogledu daljnje provedbe.
Recommendation 3. 
Preporuka 3.
The financing mechanism of future construction projects will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 
Mehanizam za financiranje budućih građevinskih projekata procjenjivat će se prema pojedinačnim slučajevima.
Recommendation 4 The Council accepts the recommendation and has already taken measures to formalise a project management procedure. 
Preporuka 4. Vijeće prihvaća preporuku i već je poduzelo mjere za formalizaciju postupka upravljanja projektima.
Recommendation 5 The Council accepts the recommendation. 
Preporuka 5. Vijeće prihvaća preporuku.
Regarding point (a), an assessment will be conducted in order to identify possible indicators and ways of implementing them. 
U pogledu točke (a) provest će se procjena kako bi se utvrdili mogući pokazatelji i načini njihove provedbe.
Regarding points (b) and (c), the Council will participate in any initiative to implement the common methodology. 
U pogledu točaka (b) i (c) Vijeće će sudjelovati u svakoj inicijativi za provedbu zajedničke metodologije.
The Council agrees to discuss this matter in the inter-institutional Infrastructure, Logistics and Internal Services (ILIS) Working Group. 2/ 
Vijeće se slaže razmotriti to pitanje na razini međuinstitucijske Radne skupine za infrastrukturu, logistiku i interne usluge (ILIS).
Replies of the European Commission OBSERVATIONS 13. 
Odgovor Europske komisije PRIMJEDBE 13.
The Commission adapts on a yearly basis to changing conditions related to, e.g., budgetary constraints, staffing policies and other political decisions by means of the Multiannual Policy Framework (MAPF). 
Komisija se svake godine prilagođava promjeni uvjeta povezanih s npr. proračunskim ograničenjima, kadrovskim politikama i drugim političkim odlukama putem višegodišnjih okvira politika.
This tool takes into account all likely decisions and constraints affecting the planning of property requirements for a 10-year horizon. 
Tim se instrumentom uzimaju u obzir sve vjerojatne odluke i ograničenja koja utječu na planiranje zahtjeva za prostore za desetogodišnje razdoblje.
In this context, there is no need to develop different scenarios. 
U tom kontekstu nema potrebe za izradom različitih scenarija.
The Commission would like to highlight that the main driver for the Commission to consider and engage, wherever appropriate, in new ways of working is primarily the creation of an optimal working environment. 
Komisija bi željela istaknuti da je glavni razlog za razmatranje i uvođenje novih načina rada, ako je potrebno, prije svega stvaranje optimalnog radnog okruženja.
Even though external benchmarking shows that new ways of working can, to a certain extent, result in cost savings, these are considered as side effects and the intention is to largely re-invest them in staff wellbeing through improved quality of office space and IT equipment. 
Iako vanjske referentne vrijednosti pokazuju da novi načini rada mogu u određenoj mjeri dovesti do uštede troškova, to se smatra nuspojavom i namjera je da se veći dio ušteđenih sredstava uloži u dobrobit djelatnika poboljšanjem kvalitete uredskog prostora i informatičke opreme.
Explorative work in that respect and the implementation of pilot projects are ongoing. 
U tom pogledu u tijeku su istraživanja i provedba pilot-projekata.
37. (b) Concerning the financing options, the Commission will have to borrow funds on the market in order to acquire the JMOII building. 
37. (b) Kad je riječ o mogućnostima financiranja, Komisija će morati posuditi sredstva na tržištu kako bi kupila zgradu JMOII.
To this aim, in 2012, different scenarios were developed based on size of the loan, interest rates, and duration of the loan. 
U tu svrhu 2012. su izrađeni različiti scenariji na temelju iznosa zajma, kamatnih stopa i roka otplate zajma.
The Commission considers that its budgetary procedure is transparent and would like to note that: 1. 
Komisija smatra da je njezin proračunski postupak transparentan i želi napomenuti sljedeće: 1.
The principle of specification means that appropriations may be used only for the purpose for which they have been provided. 
Načelo specifikacije znači da se odobrena sredstva mogu koristiti samo za namjenu za koju su osigurana.
This requirement is basically satisfied by dividing the budget into chapters, the budget appropriations used were also earmarked for administrative expenditure; 2. 
Taj je zahtjev u osnovi zadovoljen podjelom proračuna u dva poglavlja, pri čemu su i korištena proračunska sredstva bila predviđena za pokrivanje administrativnih rashoda; 2.
These transfers are expressly authorised by the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Article 317), under the conditions laid down in the Financial Regulation. 
Ti su prijenosi izričito odobreni Ugovorom o funkcioniranju Europske unije (članak 317.), pod uvjetima utvrđenima u Financijskoj uredbi.
It permits the final matching up of identified needs and expected surpluses with a view to achieving an optimum outturn. 
Dopušteno je završno usklađivanje utvrđenih potreba i očekivanih viškova u cilju postizanja optimalne realizacije.
The Commission considers that by approving these transfers, the budgetary authority recognises the financial advantage of the advance payments. 
Komisija smatra da odobrenjem tih prijenosa proračunsko tijelo priznaje financijsku pogodnost predujmova.
The Commission will negotiate with the Luxembourgish authorities how the additional costs will be shared. 
Komisija će pregovarati s luksemburškim tijelima o podjeli zajedničkih troškova.
This is due to the changes to the project schedule relative to the December 2015 Georgieva – Asselborn agreement, taking into account the role of both parties for the delays. 
To je zbog izmjena rokova projekta u odnosu na sporazum Georgieva–Asselborn iz prosinca 2015. uzimajući u obzir ulogu obiju strana u kašnjenju.
The Commission does not agree with this observation. 
Komisija se ne slaže s ovom primjedbom.
The Commission considers that the rental costs due to the moving out of JMO to the replacement buildings (T2, Ariane and Laccolith) are independent from the changes in the construction calendar of JMO II, as the move was due to the asbestos in the JMO building. 
Komisija smatra da troškovi najma zbog preseljenja iz zgrade JMO u zamjenske zgrade (T2, Ariane i Laccolith) ne ovise o izmjenama rokova izgradnje objekta JMO II jer je preseljenje bilo zbog azbesta u zgradi JMO.
Had the Commission been able to remain in the JMO building, it would have continued to rent it from the Luxembourgish authorities for a very low amount (EUR1), therefore the rental costs would have been reduced by EUR 90 million. 
Da je Komisija mogla ostati u zgradi JMO, nastavila bi je unajmljivati od luksemburških tijela po vrlo niskoj cijeni (1 EUR), tako da bi troškovi najma bili smanjeni za 90 milijuna EUR.
The Commission would like to highlight that, in real estate matters, the different size, needs and localisation of each institution lead to the specific characteristics that can have an important influence on comparability of results. 
Komisija želi istaknuti da kod nekretnina zbog razlika u veličini, potrebama i lokaciji pojedine institucije nastaju posebne karakteristike koje mogu imati važan utjecaj na usporedivost rezultata.
The Commission would like to clarify that the reported variance of rent per person is due to several factors, such as the valuation method of the purchased buildings, the potential cost of fitting-out works, the consideration of buffer spaces, etc. 
Komisija bi željela razjasniti da je do navedene razlike u najmu po osobi došlo zbog nekoliko čimbenika kao što su metoda vrednovanja kupljenih zgrada, potencijalni trošak opremanja, prostor pored gradilišta itd.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 - The institutions1 should update and formalise their building strategies and regularly update planning documents The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
ZAKLJUČCI I PREPORUKE Preporuka 1 – institucije1 bi trebale ažurirati i formalizirati svoje građevinske strategije te redovito ažurirati dokumentaciju s planovima Komisija djelomično prihvaća preporuku.
Concerning the building strategy, the main principles of the Commission’s real estate policy as outlined in the Communication COM(2007)501 are to the largest extent still up-to-date. 
Kad je riječ o strategiji građenja glavna načela Komisijine nekretninske politike izložena u Komunikaciji COM(2007)501 u velikoj su mjeri ažurirana.
This policy might be reviewed in light of the developments concerning the NWoW being implemented and on the outcome of 2021-2027 MFF negotiations. 
Ta bi se politika mogla revidirati s obzirom uvođenje novih načina rada i ishod pregovora o VFO-u za razdoblje 2021.–2027.
Concerning planning documents, the Commission considers that these documents (MAPFs and Working Document on Buildings accompanying the Draft Budget) are already updated annually. 
Kad je riječ o dokumentaciji s planovima Komisija smatra da se ti dokumenti (višegodišnji okviri politika i radni dokument o zgradama priloženi nacrtu proračuna) već ažuriraju svake godine.
Consequently the Commission is not concerned by this part of recommendation. 
Stoga se taj dio preporuke ne odnosi na Komisiju.
See also reply to paragraph 13. 
Vidjeti i odgovor na stavak 13.
Recommendation 2 – The institutions should evaluate the New Ways of Working projects The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Preporuka 2 – Institucije bi trebale ocijeniti projekte novih načina rada Komisija prihvaća preporuku.
The Commission acknowledges the complexity of the financial regulations but does not agree with the statement that the mechanisms are not transparent (see replies to paragraph 42). 
Komisija priznaje složenost financijskih propisa, ali ne slaže se s izjavom da mehanizmi nisu transparentni (vidjeti odgovore na stavak 42.).
Recommendation 3 – The institutions should increase budgetary transparency of the financing mechanisms for construction projects. 
Preporuka 3 – Institucije bi trebale povećati proračunsku transparentnost mehanizama financiranja za građevinske projekte.
Concerning budgetary transparency, the Commission refers to its replies in paragraph 42. 
U pogledu proračunske transparentnosti Komisija upućuje na svoje odgovore u stavku 42.
Moreover, the Commission could provide each year in the Working Document on Buildings accompanying the Draft Budget, the information about advance payments that would be made for the various projects. 
Nadalje, Komisija bi u radnom dokumentu o zgradama priloženom nacrtu proračuna mogla svake godine navesti podatke o predujmovima za različite projekte.
For example, the advance payments made in 2018 would be included in the Working Document for 2020. 
Na primjer, predujmovi isplaćeni 2018. naveli bi se u radnom dokumentu 2020.
Recommendation 4 – The institutions should set up adequate management procedures for large construction and renovation projects The Commission partially accepts the recommendation. 
Preporuka 4 – Institucije bi trebale uspostaviti prikladne procedure za upravljanje velikim građevinskim i renovacijskim projektima Komisija djelomično prihvaća preporuku.
The Commission considers that the required building management procedure is in place. 
Komisija smatra da tražene procedure upravljanja zgradama postoje.
This might be reassessed in the mid-term, particularly in relation to construction and renovation projects such as Loi 130. 
To bi se u srednjem roku moglo ponovno procijeniti, osobito za građevinske i renovacijske projekte kao što je Loi 130.
Recommendation 5 – The institutions should improve consistency of data and monitoring of the buildings portfolio The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
Preporuka 5 – Institucije bi trebale poboljšati dosljednost podataka i praćenje portfelja zgrada Komisija prihvaća preporuku.
The Commission would like to highlight that in real estate matters the different size, needs and localisation of each institution lead to the specific characteristics that can have an important influence on comparison results. 3 
Komisija želi istaknuti da kod nekretnina zbog razlika u veličini, potrebama i lokaciji pojedine institucije nastaju posebne karakteristike koje mogu imati važan utjecaj na uspoređivanje rezultata.
Replies of the Court of Justice INTRODUCTION In general, the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court of Justice’) welcomes the very positive findings made by the European Court of Auditors (‘the Court of Auditors’) concerning the efficiency of its buildings policy, its successful cooperation with the other institutions and with the Luxembourg authorities and the excellent results achieved by the three major building projects audited. 
Odgovor Suda Europske unije UVOD Uvodno valja navesti da Sud Europske unije (u daljnjem tekstu: Sud) pozdravlja vrlo pozitivna utvrđenja Europskog revizorskog suda (u daljnjem tekstu: Revizorski sud) u pogledu učinkovitosti Suda u vođenju nekretninske politike te uspješne suradnje s drugim institucijama i luksemburškim vlastima kao i u pogledu ostvarenja izvrsnih rezultata u okviru triju opsežnih projekata koji su bili predmet revizije.
The building policy of the Court of Justice has two major objectives: — firstly, having first followed a policy of renting, the Court intends, since the definitive fixing of its seat in Luxembourg (decided at the Edinburgh European Council in 1992), to become the owner of the buildings which it occupies, like the other institutions and in line with the recommendations of the Court of Auditors Special Report (No 2/2007) which underlined the budgetary savings of such a policy; — secondly, the Court intends to have premises suitable for its specific judicial needs and to bring all its services together on a single site so as to optimise its functioning. 
Dva su glavna zadana cilja nekretninske politike Suda: – kao prvo, vodeći se na početku politikom unajmljivanja nekretnina, Sud, nakon konačnog utvrđenja svojeg sjedišta u Luxembourgu (odlukom Europskog vijeća u Edinburghu 1992.), nastoji steći vlasništvo zgrada u kojima se nalazi, kao što to čine i druge institucije, a u skladu s preporukama iz posebnog izvješća Revizorskog suda (br. 2/2007) u kojem se ističu proračunske uštede takve politike; – kao drugo, Sud nastoji raspolagati prostorima koji su prilagođeni posebnostima potreba sudovanja i objediniti sve svoje službe na jednom mjestu radi optimiranja svojeg djelovanja.
The consistency with which that has been followed, combined with excellent cooperation with the Luxembourg public authorities, has given rise, over time, to very good results. 
Dosljednost u vođenju te politike i izvrsna suradnja s luksemburškim javnim vlastima ostvarili su s vremenom vrlo dobre rezultate.
Through the establishment of a system of rigorous and effective internal monitoring, the Court of Justice, with restricted human and financial resources, has run the three audited projects in strict compliance with the specifications of requirements, the timetables and the budgets set. 
Zahvaljujući uspostavi strogog i učinkovitog sustava internog nadzora, Sud je s ograničenim ljudskim i financijskim resursima vodio tri projekta koja su bila predmet revizije uz strogo poštovanje utvrđenih specifikacija, rokova i proračuna.
The Court of Justice emphasises that the configuration of its buildings complex had to be adapted to the task and judicial activities of the institution and to the needs of its occupants, mostly lawyers. 
Valja naglasiti da je raspored nekretninskog kompleksa Suda trebalo prilagoditi njegovu mandatu i pravosudnim aktivnostima te institucije kao i potrebama zaposlenika, uglavnom pravnika.
The buildings strategy of the Court of Justice pursues the objective of transparency and responsibility, its achievements being presented annually to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union in reports which are also available to the public on its website. 
Cilj nekretninske strategije Suda jest transparentnost i odgovornost, pri čemu se njezini rezultati svake godine predstavljaju Europskom parlamentu i Vijeću Europske unije u obliku izvješća, koja su također dostupna javnosti na internetskoj stranici Suda.
The building policy of the Court of Justice has also developed in such a way as to comply with environmental standards, which enabled it to obtain EMAS registration. 
Nekretninska politika Suda razvijana je imajući u vidu i poštovanje okolišnih standarda, što je omogućilo registraciju u sustavu EMAS.
Response to points 38 to 41 of the report: The financing of three audited building projects of the Court of Justice was in fact complex but at the same time perfectly supervised and conducted in a fully transparent manner. 
OPAŽANJA Odgovor na odlomke 38. do 41. izvješća: Financiranje triju nekretninskih projekata Suda koji su bili predmet revizije uistinu je bilo složeno, ali istodobno posve uređeno i potpuno transparentno provedeno.
The documents used to establish the financial framework were drawn up by the competent authorities of the host State in accordance with the legal provisions applicable and have been published or made available to the audit bodies and the budget discharge authorities. 
Dokumentaciju koja je služila za izradu financijskog okvira donijela su nadležna tijela države domaćina u skladu s mjerodavnim zakonskim odredbama te je ona objavljena odnosno učinjena dostupnom revizijskim tijelima i tijelima nadležnima za davanje proračunske razrješnice.