natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Results of the perception survey of participants in the European Commission’s public consultations 56 Preparation of the public consultation: Satisfaction The language used during the consultation process 82 % The information available about the scope and aim of the public consultation 75 % The background documents, links and other reference documents that were available 60 % Taking part in the public consultation: Satisfaction The duration of the public consultation (number of weeks the questionnaire was accessible at the European Commission’s website for responses) 79 % The length of the public consultation’s questionnaire The clarity and simplicity of the public consultation’s q uestions express your views onsultation: 80 % 69 % 76 % Satisfaction The number of open questions with free text boxes to and provide detailed comments Information on the results of the public c The “factual report” which included a summary of all i nput received 41 % The “synopsis report” which included information on how responses received have been taken into account 38 % The information available about the related legislative proposal 38 % To what extent do you agree with the following statements? 
58 Rezultati ankete o predodžbi među sudionicima javnih savjetovanja Europske komisije 59 75 % Razina zadovoljstva Priprema javnog savjetovanja: Jezik koji se upotrebljava tijekom postupka savjetovanja 82 % Dostupne informacije o opsegu i cilju javnog savjetovanja Dostupnost dokumenata o kontekstu, poveznica i drugih referentnih dokumenata 60 % Razina zadovoljstva Sudjelovanje u javnom savjetovanju: Trajanje javnog savjetovanja (broj tjedana u kojima je upitnik bio dostupan na internetskoj stranici Europske komisije za pružanje odgovora) Broj otvorenih pitanja s okvirima za slobodno unošenj izražavanja vlastitih mišljenja i iznošenja detaljnih pri 79 % Duljina upitnika u okviru javnog savjetovanja 80 % Jasnoća i jednostavnost pitanja u okviru javnog savjet vanja e teksta radi jedbi Podatci o rezultatima javnog savjetovanja: 69 % 76 % Razina zadovoljstva „Izvješće o činjenicama” koje je uključivalo sažetak svi informacija h primljenih 41 % „Sažeto izvješće” koje je uključivalo informacije o tome na koji su način primljeni odgovori uzeti u obzir 38 % Dostupne informacije o zakonodavnom prijedlogu na koje se javno savjetovanje odnosi 38 % o m
Agreement EU policies and laws are designed transparently 37 % EU policies and laws are prepared based on evidence and backed up by the views of citizens and other stakeholders 33 % Citizens and other stakeholders can contribute throughout the policy and law-making process 40 % The European Commission is taking account of the opinion other stakeholders of citizens nd It is important to have public consultations carried out in a languages of the EU 33 % 92 % Source: ECA survey. a ll 24 official 
Razina slaganja in 37 % Politike i zakoni EU-a izrađuju se na temelju dokaza i uzimajući u obzir stajališta građana i drugih dionika 33 % Građani i drugi dionici mogu pridonijeti postupku donošenja politika i zakona 40 % Europska komisija uzima u obzir mišljenje građana i drugih dionika 33 % Važno je provoditi javna savjetovanja na sva 24 službena jezika EU-a 92 % Izvor: anketa koju je proveo Sud.
Detailed statistics 1. 
Detaljni statistički podatci 1.
How many times have you participated in public consultations organised by the European Commission in the last three years, 2016, 2017 and 2018? once 2 or 3 times more than 3 times 2. 
Koliko ste puta u posljednje tri godine, 2016., 2017. i 2018. godine, sudjelovali u javnim savjetovanjima koja je organizirala Europska komisija? jedanput 2 ili 3 puta više od 3 puta 2.
Were you replying Answers Ratio 1 318 695 211 59.26 % 31.25 % 9.49 % 3. 
Jeste li sudjelovali Odgovori Omjer 1 318 695 211 59,26 % 31,25 % 9,49 % 3.
How were you informed about the European Commission’s public consultations? by the European Commission’s webpage by the European Commission’s social media channels by a civil society organisation (non-governmental organisations, labour unions, farmers’ associations or other) by national authorities by regional or local authorities by a colleague/friend by my employer by news or articles (whether online or offline) by other 4. 
Navedite izvor putem kojega ste saznali za javna savjetovanja Europske komisije internetska stranica Europske komisije kanali Europske komisije u okviru društvenih mreža organizacija civilnog društva (nevladine organizacije, sindikati, udruge poljoprivrednika ili drugo) nacionalna tijela regionalna ili lokalna tijela kolega/prijatelj poslodavac vijesti ili članci (bilo putem internetske mreže bilo izvanmrežno) drugo 4.
Why did you participate? you were interested in the topic you wanted to influence the legislative outcome you considered your participation a civic responsibility you wanted to share your expertise you were directly affected by the legislative outcome you were asked, in your professional capacity, to participate other Answers Ratio 1 505 372 347 67.67 % 16.73 % 15.6 % 57 as an individual in your personal capacity in your professional capacity or on behalf of an organisation in both capacities Answers Ratio 374 295 1 058 85 59 200 39 655 143 16.82 % 13.26 % 47.57 % 3.82 % 2.65 % 8.99 % 1.75 % 29.45 % 6.43 % Answers Ratio 1 237 1 295 1 085 392 295 158 31 55.62 58.23 % 48.79 % 17.63 % 13.26 % 7.1 % 1.39 % % 
Zašto ste sudjelovali? zanimala vas je tema željeli ste utjecati na ishod zakonodavnih propisa smatrali ste da sudjelovanjem ispunjavate svoju građansku dužnost htjeli ste podijeliti svoje iskustvo ishod zakonodavnih propisa izravno vas se je doticao od vas je zatraženo da sudjelujete u profesionalnom svojstvu drugo Odgovori Omjer 1 505 372 347 67,67 % 16,73 % 15,6 % 61 kao pojedinac u svoje osobno ime u profesionalnom svojstvu ili u ime određene organizacije u oba svojstva Odgovori Omjer 374 295 1 058 85 59 200 39 655 143 16,82 % 13,26 % 47,57 % 3,82 % 2,65 % 8,99 % 1,75 % 29,45 % 6,43 % Odgovori Omjer 1 237 1 295 1 085 392 295 158 31 55,62 % 58,23 % 48,79 % 17,63 % 13,26 % 7,1 % 1,39 %
What was your overall satisfaction with the process of this public consultation? satisfied rather satisfied rather dissatisfied dissatisfied don’t know / no opinion Answers Ratio 327 23.11 % 600 42.4 % 190 13.43 % 112 7.92 % 186 13.14 % 8.1. Preparation of the public consultation: (1) The language used during the consultation process Satisfied Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Answers Ratio 754 53.29 % 410 28.98 % 124 8.76 % 
8. 8. Priprema javnog savjetovanja: (1.) 75 31.
Taking part in the public consultation: (1) The duration of the public consultation (number of weeks the questionnaire was accessible at the European Commission’s website for responses) Satisfied Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Dissatisfied Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable Answers Ratio 620 43.82 % 495 34.98 % 85 6.01 % 43 3.04 % 172 12.16 % 8.2. 
8. 2. Sudjelovanje u javnom savjetovanju: (1.)
Taking part in the public consultation: (2) The length of the questionnaire Satisfied Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Dissatisfied Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable Answers Ratio 482 34.06 % 646 45.65 % 170 12.01 % 42 2.97 % 75 5.3 % 8.2. 
2. Duljina upitnika bio/bila sam zadovoljan/zadovoljna bio/bila sam prilično zadovoljan/zadovoljna bio/bila sam prilično nezadovoljan/nezadovoljna bio/bila sam nezadovoljan/nezadovoljna ne znam / nemam mišljenje o tome / nije primjenjivo Odgovori Omjer 620 43,82 % 495 34,98 % 85 6,01 % 43 3,04 % 172 12,16 % Odgovori Omjer 482 34,06 % 646 45,65 % 170 12,01 % 42 2,97 % 75 5,3 %
Taking part in the public consultation: (3) The clarity and simplicity of the public consultation’s questions Satisfied Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Dissatisfied Answers Ratio 403 28.48 % 577 40.78 % 261 18.45 % 118 8.34 % 
8. 2. 3.
Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable 56 3.96 % 8.2. Taking part in the public consultation: (4) The number of open questions with free text boxes to express your views and provide detailed comments Answers Ratio 60 Satisfied Rather satisfied 606 Rather dissatisfied 137 Dissatisfied 55 Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable 152 465 32.86 % 42.83 % 9.68 % 3.89 % 10.74 % 8.3. 
8. 3. Sudjelovanje u javnom savjetovanju: (4.) 68
Information on the results of the public consultation: (1) The “factual report” which included a summary of all input received Answers Ratio Satisfied 220 15.55 % Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Dissatisfied 197 13.92 % 359 25.37 % 239 16.89 % Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable 400 28.27 % 8.3. Information on the results of the public consultation: (2) The “synopsis report” which included information on how responses received have been taken into account Answers Ratio Satisfied 205 14.49 % Rather satisfied Rather dissatisfied Dissatisfied 231 16.33 % 328 23.18 % 248 17.53 % Don’t know / No opinion / Not applicable 403 28.48 % 8.3. 
8. 2. 3.
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?: (2) EU policies and laws are prepared based on evidence and backed up by the views of citizens and other stakeholders Agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Disagree Don’t know / No opinion Answers Ratio 157 7.06 % 568 25.54 % 727 32.69 % 648 29.14 % 124 5.58 % 61 9. 
2. 9. 68 69
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?: (3) Citizens and other stakeholders can contribute throughout the policy and law-making process Agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Disagree Don’t know / No opinion Answers Ratio 246 11.06 % 619 27.83 % 735 33.05 % 498 22.39 % 126 5.67 % 9. 
3. 9. 67
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?: (4) The European Commission is taking account of the opinion of citizens and other stakeholders Agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Disagree Don’t know / No opinion Answers Ratio 175 7.87% 540 24.28 % 720 32.37 % 619 27.83 % 170 7.64 % 9. 
9. U kojoj se mjeri slažete sa sljedećim tvrdnjama?: (4.) 75
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?: (5) It is important to have public consultations carried out in all 24 official languages of the EU Agree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Disagree Don’t know / No opinion Answers Ratio 1 648 381 72 56 67 74.1 % 17.13 % 3.24 % 2.52 % 3.01 % 
5. Važno je provoditi javna savjetovanja na sva 24 službena jezika EU-a Slažem se U načelu se slažem U načelu se ne slažem Ne slažem se Ne znam / nemam mišljenje o tome Odgovori 1 648 381 72 56 67 Omjer 74,1 % 17,13 % 3,24 % 2,52 % 3,01 %
Annex IV — Translation of citizens’ responses Citizen 1: “Die Möglichkeit, außerhalb von Wahlen meine Meinung mitzuteilen und diese in die Gestaltung Europas einzubringen.” 
Prilog IV. – Prijevod odgovora građana Građanin 1.: „Die Möglichkeit, außerhalb von Wahlen meine Meinung mitzuteilen und diese in die Gestaltung Europas einzubringen.”
(DE) / “The opportunity to share my opinion outside elections and so help to shape Europe.” 
(DE) / „Prilika da iznesem mišljenje i negdje drugdje osim na izborima te tako doprinesem oblikovanju Europe.”
(IT) / “The opportunity to express an opinion directly without intermediaries.” 
Građanin 2.: „La possibilità di poter esprimere un'opinione direttamente senza intermediari.”
(LV) / “Opportunity to express your thoughts and wishes as a farmer.” 
(LV) / „Prilika da izrazim svoja razmišljanja i želje kao poljoprivrednik.”
(EN) Citizen 5: “... 
Građanin 5.: „...
(DE) / “... 
(DE) / „...
An important milestone on the way to democratizing the EU.” 
To što ova mogućnost postoji važan je korak na putu k demokratizaciji EU-a.”
(ES) / “I find this type of consultation interesting, as long as its result are used to make decisions and citizens are not consulted only at elections. 
(ES) / „Smatram da je ova vrsta savjetovanja zanimljiva pod uvjetom da se dobiveni rezultati upotrijebe za donošenje odluka i da se građane za mišljenje ne pita samo na izborima.
I think this is serious.” 
Mislim da je to ozbiljan problem.”
(EN) Citizen 9: “To da se traži mišljenje i nas 'običnih' građana i malih subjekata.” 
Građanin 9.: „To da se traži mišljenje i nas „običnih’ građana i malih subjekata.”
(HR) / “To ask for the views of ‘ordinary’ citizens and small businesses.” 
(HR) Građanin 10.: „Difficulté à savoir à quoi elle va servir CONCRÈTEMENT.”
(FR) / “Difficult to know how they will be used IN CONCRETE TERMS.” 
(FR) / „Teško je znati kako će se TOČNO upotrijebiti.”
(EN) Citizen 11: “Es hat den Eindruck einer reinen Alibibefragung hinterlassen.” 
Građanin 11.: „Es hat den Eindruck einer reinen Alibibefragung hinterlassen.”
(DE) / “It gives the impression of being a token survey.” 
(DE) / „Ostaje dojam da se anketa provodi čisto pro forma.”
(FR) / “... it is JUST a token consultation that seems pro forma and unfortunately not yet a genuine exercise of participatory democracy... . 
Građanin 12.: „... c'est JUSTE une consultation qui semble pro forma et pas encore un réel exercice de démocratie participative, hélas...
Otherwise, the gap between citizens and Eurocrats will continue to widen, something which can only benefit Eurosceptics and populists.” 
Sinon, le fossé entre citoyen et eurocrate ne cessera de s'agrandir, ce qui sera tout bénéfice pour les eurosceptiques et autres national-populistes.”
(EN) Citizen 13: “... 
Građanin 13.: „...
( BG) / “... 
(BG) / „...
In this situation, what is the point of wasting our time taking part in these consultations?” 
U toj situaciji, koja je svrha gubljenja vremena na sudjelovanje u ovim savjetovanjima?”
(EN) Citizen 14: “... não tive perceção da utilidade da participação.” 
Građanin 14.: „... não tive perceção da utilidade da participação.”
(PT) / “... [I] didn’t see the value in taking part.” 
(PT) / „...Ne vidim korist od sudjelovanja.”
(NL) / “... 
(NL) / „...
The EU is not there for ordinary European citizens.” 
EU ne vodi računa o običnim europskim građanima.”
(NL) / “Perhaps the consultations should be more widely advertised to the general public. 
(NL) / „Možda bi se savjetovanja trebala intenzivnije oglašavati u široj javnosti.
If you are not a member of an NGO or other organisation, you are often unaware of them.” 
Ako niste član neke nevladine ili druge organizacije, često niste ni svjesni da ta savjetovanja postoje.”
(EN) Citizen 20: “... gdyby nie organizacje i fundacje to nigdy bym sie nie wypowiedziala na zaden temat bo nic do mnie nie dociera, zaadna ankieta.” 
Građanin 20.: „... gdyby nie organizacje i fundacje to nigdy bym sie nie wypowiedziala na zaden temat bo nic do mnie nie dociera, zaadna ankieta.”
(PL) / “...if it weren’t for organisations and foundations, I would never comment on any subject because nothing reaches me, e.g. questionnaires.” 
(PL) / „...da nema organizacija i zaklada, nikad ne bih komentirao nijednu temu jer ništa ne dolazi do mene, primjerice upitnici.”
(DE) / “I would like to be able to read in my daily paper about current European Commission topics. 
(DE) / „Želio bih da u dnevnim novinama mogu pročitati o tome koje su aktualne teme Europske komisije.
I would also like there to be radio, television and press coverage of current surveys.” 
Također bih želio da na radiju, televiziji i u medijima postoje izvještaji o aktualnim anketama.”
(EN) Citizen 22: “J'ai découvert les consultations publiques UE par Facebook alors que j'ai 31 ans. 
Građanin 22.: „J'ai découvert les consultations publiques UE par Facebook alors que j'ai 31 ans.
(FR) / “I discovered EU public consultations on Facebook even though I'm 31. 
(FR) / „Iako imam 31 godinu, javna savjetovanja EU-a otkrio sam na Facebooku.
More communication about the EU and its future laws is needed.” 
Potrebna je bolja komunikacija o EU-u i njegovim budućim zakonima.”
(GR) / “Send people newsletters by email about policies they say they’re interested in.” 
(GR) / „Ljudima bi e-poštom trebalo slati novosti o politikama za koje iskažu zanimanje.”
well as reaching out to citizens electronically, a public campaign is also important in order to involve those citizens who are most interested.” 
Građanin 24.: „Určitě, je kromě elektronického oslovení občanů důležitá i veřejná kampaň, aby se zúčastnilo maximum zainteresovaných občanů.”
(EN) Citizen 25: “Enemmän tietoa näistä kyselyistä eri paikkoihin! 
Građanin 25.: „Enemmän tietoa näistä kyselyistä eri paikkoihin!
(FI) / “More information about these surveys in different locations! 
(FI) / „Potrebno je više informacija o tim anketama na različitim mjestima!
For example, it would be good if these surveys – and EU-wide citizens’ initiatives – were visible on the same website as Finnish civic and municipal initiatives.” 
Na primjer, bilo bi dobro da su te ankete, kao i građanske inicijative na razini EU-a, vidljive na istim internetskim stranicama kao i građanske i općinske inicijative u Finskoj.”
(EN) Citizen 27: “... escaso entusiasmo e implicación de los Gobiernos en estos procesos.” 
Građanin 27.: „... escaso entusiasmo e implicación de los Gobiernos en estos procesos.”
(ES) / “Little enthusiasm and involvement in these processes by governments.” 
(ES) / „Vlade pokazuju slab entuzijazam i angažiranost u tim procesima.”
(EN) Citizen 28: “De betrokkenheid met nationale parlementen is naar mijn idee te gering.“ (NL) / “I think there is too little involvement with national parliaments.” 
Građanin 28.: “De betrokkenheid met nationale parlementen is naar mijn idee te gering.“ (NL) / „Mislim da su nacionalni parlamenti premalo angažirani.”
(DE) / “The above documents were mostly available only in foreign languages. 
(DE) / „Navedeni dokumenti bili su uglavnom dostupni samo na stranim jezicima.
Such bureaucratic language is already very complicated in German, so this is a non-starter!” 
Takav birokratski jezik vrlo je složen i na njemačkom jeziku pa je nemoguće ostvariti ikakav rezultat!”
(EN) Citizen 31: “Limbajul greoi, jargonul administrativ, textele trebuie curăţate şi traduse în limbajul uzual al unei populaţii mediu educate.” 
Građanin 31.: „Limbajul greoi, jargonul administrativ, textele trebuie curăţate şi traduse în limbajul uzual al unei populaţii mediu educate.”
(RO) / “Dense language and administrative jargon: such documents should be made clearer and translated into a style that people with an ordinary education can understand.” 
(RO) / „Teški tekstovi i administrativni žargon: takve dokumente treba jasnije sročiti i prevesti na način koji osobe s redovnim obrazovanjem mogu razumjeti.”
(DK) / “In a new survey, which I have to answer, the questions should be in my mother tongue: Danish. 
(DK) / „U novoj anketi na koju moram odgovoriti pitanja bi trebala biti na mojem materinskom jeziku: danskom.
The wording should also be easier to understand, as not everyone has a university-level education.” 
Tekst bi također trebao biti razumljiviji s obzirom na to da nisu svi visokoobrazovani.”
(FR) / “Some difficult questions for non-specialists in the policy area in question –questions are not always accessible.” 
(FR) / „Bilo je teških pitanja za osobe koje nisu stručnjaci u predmetnom području politike – pitanja nisu uvijek jasna.”
(EN) Citizen 35: “... 
Građanin 35.: “...
The measures need to be adjusted to the people to which they’re intended for.” 
Mjere je potrebno prilagoditi ljudima kojima su namijenjene.”
Citizen 36: “e-Dostopnost za mlade NAJBOLJNAJMANJ - izključenost starejših, ki niso digitalizirani.” 
Građanin 36.: „e-Dostopnost za mlade NAJBOLJNAJMANJ - izključenost starejših, ki niso digitalizirani.”
(SL) / “Accessible for young people, but not for older people who are less familiar with technology.” 
(SL) / „E-dostupnost za mlade – isključivanje starijih koji nisu digitalizirani.”
(DE) / “I felt that the purpose of the questions was not always clear, so it was extremely important to have extra space for comments where an answer could be explained in more detail.” 
(DE) / „Smatram da svrha pitanja nije uvijek jasna pa je iznimno važno imati dodatni prostor za komentare kojima se odgovor može detaljnije objasniti.”
(EN) Citizen 39: “...möjligheten att lämna fria synpunkter och bifoga material” (SE) / “...the opportunity to express free comments and attach material.” 
Građanin 39.: „...möjligheten att lämna fria synpunkter och bifoga material” (SE) / „... prilika za slobodno izražavanje komentara i prilaganje materijala.”
(EN) Citizen 41: “Une consultation particulière avec la forte participation de campagnes de réponses (living land et syndicats agricoles), la Commission européenne a peu communiqué sur les méthodes utilisées pour traiter ces données à part.” 
Građanin 41.: „Une consultation particulière avec la forte participation de campagnes de réponses (living land et syndicats agricoles), la Commission européenne a peu communiqué sur les méthodes utilisées pour traiter ces données à part.”
(FR) / “For one particular consultation with a high participation rate (living land and agricultural unions), the European Commission gave very little information about the methods used to process these data separately.” 
(FR) / „O jednom konkretnom savjetovanju s visokom stopom sudjelovanja (o životu od plodova zemlje i poljoprivrednim udruženjima) Europska komisija dala je vrlo malo informacija o metodama koje su primijenjene kako bi se ti podatci obradili zasebno.”
(FR) / “We don’t know how the results will be used: how are the replies analysed and weighted? 
(FR) / „Ne znamo kako će se rezultati upotrijebiti: kako se odgovori analiziraju i kako im se određuje relativna važnost?
How are the results then used to prepare legislative proposals (if this is actually the purpose they serve)?” 
Kako se rezultati potom koriste za izradu zakonodavnih prijedloga (ako je to zapravo svrha kojoj služe)?”
(ES) / “The EU is influenced by corporate lobbies. 
(ES) / „EU je pod utjecajem korporativnih lobija.
Its goal is not ordinary people’s wellbeing.” 
Njegov cilj nije dobrobit običnih ljudi.”
(FR) / “The way the EU currently operates is not democratic at all and the lobby groups seem to have greater power than the people, which is bad for everyone. 
(FR) / „Način na koji EU trenutačno djeluje nije nimalo demokratičan, a čini se da lobističke skupine imaju veću moć od ljudi, što je loše za svakoga.
Social policy is the big loser, as the EU is only there to serve the interests of big corporations and banks at the people’s expense.” 
Socijalna politika velik je gubitnik s obzirom na to da EU služi samo interesima velikih korporacija i banaka nauštrb građana.” 69
Citizen 47: “niewiem jaki wynik bo nic niewiadomo.” 
Građanin 47.: „Niewiem jaki wynik bo nic niewiadomo.”
(PL) / “I don’t know what the result is, I don’t know anything about it.” 
(PL) / „Ne znam koji je rezultat, ne znam ništa o tome.”
(HU) / “I don’t receive a summary of the opinions. 
(HU) / „Ne dobivam sažetak mišljenja.
The outcome of the consultation is unknown.” 
Ne zna se koji je ishod savjetovanja.”
(DE) / “I would have expected to get an update by email, so I could track statuses and results.” 
Građanin 49.: „Ich hätte erwartet mal ein Update per email zu bekommen, wo ich Status und Ergebnisse denn verfolgen könnte.”
(EN) Citizen 51: “... l'absence d'infos, accompagnements, suites... données après la participation à l'enquête: pas de panels citoyens pour débattre de la pertinence de nos idées et propositions et surtout de pouvoir exposer et expliciter nos idées et propositions.” 
Građanin 51.: „... l'absence d'infos, accompagnements, suites... données après la participation à l'enquête: pas de panels citoyens pour débattre de la pertinence de nos idées et propositions et surtout de pouvoir exposer et expliciter nos idées et propositions.”
(FR) / “...The lack of information and follow-up after taking part in the survey: there were no public groups to discuss the relevance of our ideas and proposals or to be able to present and explain our ideas and proposals.” 
(FR) / „... Nema informacija i popratnih koraka nakon sudjelovanja u anketi: nije bilo javnih skupina za raspravu o važnosti naših ideja i prijedloga ili za predstavljanje i objašnjavanje naših ideja i prijedloga.”
(IT) / “There was no direct follow-up. 
(IT) / „Nema izravnih popratnih koraka.
You need to have a lot of time to search for the news that interest you. 
Potrebno je puno vremena za pretraživanje vijesti koje vas zanimaju.