natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
46 No Project Description Grants received previously Total amount of investment Amount of EU Grant Fund TO (a) PA (b) IP/SO (c) Start & end date Outputs and results achieved Selection procedure No (see Annex III) Finland - OP Sustainable growth and work - Finland’s structural funds programme - 2014FI16M2OP001 30 To offer training for people employed intermittently to increase their chances of finding jobs and their choice of jobs (social economy) Yes 0.31 0.22 ESF 8 3 9i 1.1.2015 - 31.12.2016 Beneficiaries: 82 persons (target 100 persons) 18 31 Development of a user interface software for medical ultrasound scanner Yes 0.34 0.17 ERDF 3 1 3a 1.1 30.1.2015 - 30.4.2016 At project completion / estimate 2 years after: Turnover:+ €0.25 million + 100 % / + €10 million + 100 % Direct exports: + € 0.25 million + 100 % / + €9.8 million + 100 % Jobs: + 3 / 15 (of which women 0 / 5) (target 35) Jobs in R&D: + 3 / 10 (of which women 0 / 3) Other intangible rights 0 / 3 (target 4) 17 32 Development of new wooden cladding products coating line Yes 1.4 0.56 ERDF 3 1 3d 2.1 27.1.2015 - 27.1.2017 At project completion / estimated 2 years after completion: Turnover: + €1 million +12 % / + €2 million + 24 % (target €3 million) Direct exports: NA / + €0.3 million + 33 % (target €1 million) Jobs: + 3 / + 6 of which female: + 1 / + 2 (target 2) 17 
2016. 7. 2. 4. 1 2 4 5 7
47 No Project Description Grants received previously Total amount of investment Amount of EU Grant Fund TO (a) PA (b) IP/SO (c) Start & end date Outputs and results achieved Selection procedure No (see Annex III) Finland - OP Sustainable growth and work - Finland’s structural funds programme - 2014FI16M2OP001 33 Extension of a factory for the development of production and logistics operations Yes 1.17 0.35 ERDF 3 1 3d 2.1 1.6.2014 - 31.12.2014 At project completion / estimated 2 years after completion: Turnover: + €10 million + 150 % (target €11 million) / + €35 million + 350 % Direct exports: + €9 million + 643 % (target € 0.9 million)/ + €26 million + 999 %) Jobs: + 10 / + 50 of which women + 3 / + 5 (target 50) R&D jobs: + 2 /+ 2 of which women + 0/ + 1 (target 4) Other intangible rights 1 / 3 Project contributes to low carbon economy 17 34 Extension of the machinery park for modern technology for piping and steel structure production and re-organise the lay-out of the production site Yes 1.43 0.5 ERDF 3 1 3d 2.1 13.2.2015 – 31.12.2016 At project completion / estimated 2 years after completion: Turnover: 0 / + €1.4 million + 34 % Direct exports: 0 / + €0.46 million + 136 % (target €0.75 million) Jobs:+5/+8 ofwhichfemale 0/0 Other : energy savings NA / + 1 MWh/a 17 Notes: (a) TO: thematic objective. (b) PA: priority axis. (c) IP: investment priority and SO: specific objective. 
Opis projekta Prethodno primljena bespovratna sredstva Ukupan iznos ulaganja Iznos bespovratnih sredstava EU-a Fond TO (a) PA (b) IP/SO (c) Datum početka i završetka Ostvarenja i rezultati koji su postignuti Br. postupka odabira (vidi prilog III.) 2. 3. 49 Br. 1 2 4 5
Thematic objectives ANNEX II 48 Number Description 1 Strengthening research, technological development and innovation 2 Enhancing access to, and use of quality of, information and communication technologies 3 Enhancing the competitiveness of SMEs 4 Supporting the shift towards a low-carbon economy in all sectors 5 Promoting climate change adaptation, risk prevention and management 6 Preserving and protecting the environment and promoting resource efficiency 7 Promoting sustainable transport and removing bottlenecks in key network infrastructures 8 Promoting sustainable and quality employment and supporting labour mobility 9 Promoting social inclusion, combating poverty and any discrimination 10 Investing in education, training and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning 11 Enhancing institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders and an efficient public administration Source: Article 9 and Annex XI Part I of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
9. Tematski ciljevi PRILOG II. 1 2 4 5 7
50 No Name / identification Remarks Fund TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Type of selection procedure (c) Competitive 1st in 1st serve Projects audited (see Annex II) Czech Republic OPEIC 4 Marketing I Objective SO 2.2: To increase internationalization of SMEs - Services for SMEs focused on international competitiveness enabling entry to foreign markets; - Sophisticated consultancy of experts in international markets and consultancy for strategic management and innovation management, incl. mentoring and coaching; - Services to support SME networking in international research cooperation (Horizon 2020, COSME). 
2. Naziv / oznaka Napomene Fond TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Vrsta postupka odabira (c) Natjecateljski postupak Prema redoslijedu podnošenja Projekti obuhvaćeni revizijom (vidi prilog II.) 2 4
ERDF 3 PA2, SO 2.2 Temporary call 2.6.2015 - 30.11.2015 YES provided that the applications score a minimum of 60 points out of 100 6, 7 5 Real Estate I Objective SO 2.3: To increase the use of entrepreneurial infrastructure - Modernization of production facilities and reconstruction of existing obsolete infrastructure, and - Reconstruction of brownfields (excluding costs for the removal of ecological burdens) and their transformation into modern business premises and newly reconstructed areas. 
2015. 1. 2. 1 5 7
ERDF 3 PA2, SO 2.3 Temporary call in two phases: 1.6. till 31.8.2015 Eligible applications only: 1.12.2015 till 31.1.2016 YES provided that the applications score a minimum of 60 points out of 100 8, 9 France OP Lorraine et Vosges 6 Entreprenariat et entreprises Objective: To select projects with a view to support the investment in SMEs, at all stages of their development, to generate sustainable jobs and added-value ERDF 3 PA 2 - SO 2.3.A Permanent call 1 year revolving YES provided that the criteria are met 10, 11, 13 
1. 2016. 2. 3. 1 2
52 No Name / identification Remarks Fund TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Type of selection procedure (c) Competitive 1st in 1st serve Projects audited (see Annex II) Italy OP Piemonte 13 “Mercato del Lavoro” in the region Piedmont (except Turin province) To select trainings to shorten the access to the labour market of mainly unemployed youths and adults (19-25 years sometimes older) with low levels of education and exposed to a range of factors that put them at a greater risk of long-term unemployment (Formazione professionale finalizzata alla lotta contro la disoccupazione) Call managed by the Managing Authority ESF 8 PA1 SO: 1.8.i.1.3 Temporary call 10.7.2015 - 29.7.2015 YES scoring and ranking 19, 20 14 “Obbligo d’Istruzione” CMT 2015/2016 in Turin province To select courses to allow young people that have difficulties to integrate and have been excluded from school mainstream education, or even dropped out of school /compulsory education/instruction to fulfil their right/duty to 10 years education and training ESF 8 PA1 SO: 1.8ii.2.4 NA This call was not a selection procedure as such but consisted in the prolongation of the contracts for beneficiaries selected previously via a similar call 2011/2012. 
2015. 1. 7. 2. 1 2 4 5
For simplicity and time saving, the MA decided to reiterate the same training activity for the period 2015-2018. 
2015. 8. 1 2
21, 22 Italy OP Puglia 15 D.D. No 2487 of 22/12/2014 Objective: Facilitate the creation of new production units; the extension of existing production units; the diversification of the production to new, additional products; fundamental change in the overall production process of an existing unit ERDF 3 PA3 - 3.6 Permanent call YES provided that the criteria are met. 
12. 6. 3. 4. 1 2 4 7
23, 24 16 DD 367 of 6.8.2015 To select projects aiming at improving and upgrading the network of social welfare, educational and healthcare facilities across Puglia region. 
2015. 8. Cilj je odabrati projekte koji su usmjereni na poboljšanje i nadogradnju mreže usluga socijalne skrbi te obrazovnih i zdravstvenih usluga u cijeloj regiji Apuliji.
Its purpose is to fill in the gaps in the supply of social-care services to people, families and communities in the Region, by co-financing social investment plans or structural measures in the social, healthcare or ERDF 9 9.10 and 9.11 Permanent call YES as long as applications score a minimum of 70 points out of 100 25, 26 53 No Name / identification Remarks Fund TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Type of selection procedure (c) Competitive 1st in 1st serve Projects audited (see Annex II) educational fields. 
Naziv / oznaka Napomene Fond TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Vrsta postupka odabira (c) Natjecateljski postupak Prema redoslijedu podnošenja Projekti obuhvaćeni revizijom (vidi prilog II.) uvesti usluge socijalne skrbi koje nedostaju u ponudi osobama, obiteljima i zajednicama u Apuliji, i to sufinanciranjem socijalnih planove ulaganja ili strukturnih mjera u područjima socijalne i zdravstvene skrbi te obrazovanja.
Eligible beneficiaries are e.g. public institutions, mainly municipalities , and private bodies offering social care services, which were formerly public welfare and charity institutions or other public utilities (e.g. local health services, chamber of commerce) Finland - OP Structural Funds 17 Enterprise development and support schema Complementary ERDF support schema executed in four Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment ERDF 3 3 / all, discretional focussing on regional targeted actions Permanent, valid for the whole MFF 2014-20. 
Prihvatljivi korisnici su, primjerice, javne institucije, uglavnom općine, i privatna tijela koja pružaju usluge socijalne skrbi koje, a koja su ranije bile javne ustanove koje su djelovale u području socijalne skrbi i dobrotvornog rada ili drugih javnih usluga (npr. lokalne zdravstvene usluge, gospodarska komora) barem 70 od 100 bodova Finska – OP „Strukturni fondovi” 17 Program za razvoj i potporu poduzetništva Dodatan program potpore iz EFRR-a koji se provodi u četirima centrima za gospodarski razvoj, promet i okoliš EFRR 3 3 / svi, diskrecijsko usmjeravanje na regionalne ciljane mjere Trajni, valjan tijekom cijelog razdoblja VFO-a 2014. – 2020.
Annual national budgetary appropriation Yes, as long as applications score a minimum threshold 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34 18 Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment South Savo Finland, Mikkeli ERDF: focus on Intelligent specialization ESF: focus on Support for youth actions and Integration of actors and enhanced cooperation ESF ERDF 3 8 9 ERDF - PA2 ESF - PA3 ESF - PA4 ESF - PA5 Temporary call: 8.12.2014-16.2.2015 Yes, as long as applications score a minimum threshold 29, 30 19 Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, North Ostrobothnia, Oulu ESF ERDF all All PA/IP/SO Temporary call: 5.5.2014-29.8.2014 Yes, as long as applications score a minimum threshold N/A The projects selected were not advanced enough, thus not audited 
Godišnja nacionalna proračunska odobrena sredstva DA, pod uvjetom da prijave prijeđu donji prag bodova 27, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34 18 Centar za gospodarski razvoj, promet i okoliš, Južna Savonija, Finska, Mikkeli EFRR: naglasak na pametnim specijalizacijama ESF: naglasak na potpori mjerama za mlade te integraciji dionika i pojačanoj suradnji ESF EFRR 3 8 9 EFRR – PA2 ESF – PA3 ESF – PA4 ESF – PA5 Privremeni poziv: 8. 12. 2014. – 16.
54 No Name / identification Remarks Fund TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Type of selection procedure (c) Competitive 1st in 1st serve Projects audited (see Annex II) Finland - OP Structural Funds 20 Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, North Ostrobothnia, Oulu Under ESF: special focus on the integration of the immigrants into society Under ERDF: focus on environmental and natural resources in particular bio-recycling economy as well as energy and material efficiency and on operations/projects linked to research-and development ESF ERDF 3 8 9 ERDF - PA1 ERDF - PA2 ESF - PA3 ESF - PA4 ESF - PA5 Temporary call: ESF: 12.12.2015 - 5.2.2016 ERDF: 12.12.2015 - 12.2.2016 Yes, as long as applications score a minimum threshold Notes: (a) TO: thematic objective. (b) PA: priority axis, IP: investment priority, SO: specific objective. (c) Type of selection procedures: Temporary Calls: Calls that have a duration inferior of 12 months, usually few weeks to a few months. 
2. 56 Br. Naziv / oznaka Napomene Fond TO (a) PA/IP/SO (b) Vrsta postupka odabira (c) Natjecateljski postupak Prema redoslijedu podnošenja Projekti obuhvaćeni revizijom (vidi prilog II.) 1 2 4 5
Permanent Calls: Calls open with a duration superior of 12 months, sometimes for the whole duration of the programme period. 
Trajni poziv: poziv koji je otvoren duže od 12 mjeseci, katkad i tijekom cijelog programskog razdoblja.
Direct awards: Involve the earmarking of funding to an organisation, usually a public body, who then redistributes the money to external beneficiaries. 
Izravno sklapanje ugovora: postupak koji uključuje osiguravanje sredstava za određenu organizaciju, uglavnom javno tijelo, koje zatim raspodjeljuje sredstva vanjskim korisnicima.
Source: Documentation of the selection procedures. 
Izvor: dokumentacija o postupcima odabira.
56 ERDF ESF Total EU funds Other funds Total EU + other funds TOs covered Partnership Agreement approval date EC approval date of the OP Latest version and approval date Designation of National Authorities by EC/ MS Managing authority (MA) If applicable: Intermediate Body (IB) or Delegated Managing Authority (DMA) Amounts in million euros except for CZ Italy - OP ESF Piemonte - 2014IT05SFOP013 NA 436 436 436 872 8,9,10,11 29.10.2014 11.7.2017 12.12.2014 EC:8.9.2017 MS: 24.10.2016 MA: Region Piemonte (unit “Social Cohesion”) IB: Citta Metropolitana Torino Italy - OP Puglia - 2014IT16M2OP002 1 394 386 1 780 1 780 3 560 1,2,3,4,5,6, 7,8,9,10, 11,12 29.10.2014 17.7.2014 13.8.2015 EC: 21.2.2018 MS:18.7.2017 MA: Region Puglia (unit “Servizio Attuazione del programma”) IB: Puglia Sviluppo Finland - OP Sustainable Growth and work - 2014FI16M2OP001 766 513 1 279 1 279 2 558 1,3,4,8,9, 10 7.10.2014 11.12.2014 24.5.2016 EC: 20.12.2016 MS: 24.11.2016 MA: The Department of Enterprise and Regional Development at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment IB: ELY-Centers in Mikkeli and Oulu 
6. 1. 8. 1 2 4 5 7
59 Priority Axis Thematic Objective Investment priority Specific Objective health inequalities and better service accessibility infrastructure for children and welfare services and infrastructure for people of restricted autonomy, and upgrading the infrastructure network and local healthcare and welfare services Finland - OP Sustainable growth and work PA1 3 3a - Promoting entrepreneurship, in particular by facilitating the economic exploitation of new ideas and fostering the creation of new firms, including through business incubators 1.1 - Creating new business activities PA1 3 3d - Supporting SMEs so that they can be part of the growth in the local, national and international markets and innovative processes 2.1 - Promoting the growth and expansion abroad of SMEs PA3 8 8i - Access to employment for jobseekers and inactive people, including the long-term unemployed and people far from the labour market, also through local employment initiatives and support for labour mobility of workers 6.1 - Promoting the employment of young people and those in a weak position in the job market PA5 9 9i - Active inclusion, including with a view to promoting equal opportunities and active participation, and improving employability 10.1 - Improving the ability of those outside employment to work and function 
1. 1. 1. 2. Upravljačko tijelo: Sektor za poduzetništvo i regionalni razvoj u sklopu Ministarstva gospodarstva i zapošljavanja Posredničko tijelo: ELY centri u Mikkeliju i Ouluu 1 2 5
62 Regions PA/IP /SO Output indicators CO6: Private investment matching public support to enterprises (grants) in million euros CO7: Private investment matching public support to enterprises (non-grants) in million euros CO8: Employment increase in supported enterprises Specific indicators: Number of companies in projects where the main objective is to promote growth and international business operations Number of companies that are starting to export or that expand their exports to a new market area Energy saved (MWh) Companies with a significant increase in turnover or staff Companies promoting low-carbon solutions Less developed Transition Developed 337.15 10 4 900 5 170 1 330 460 435 1 340 650 Total 337.15 10 4 900 5 170 1 330 460 435 1 340 650 Result indicators and source Growing companies (employs min. 
1. 3. 3. 10. 10. 1 2 4 5 7
3 people and average growth of staff exceeds 10 %) (source: Statistics Finland) Transition Developed 4 326 4 759 Call Project PA 1 3d Baseline Target 2023 Baseline Target Legend: CO: common output indicator; CR: common result indicator, SR: specific result indicator (under the ERDF, all result indicators are specific to the Member State / OP). 
Polazna vrijednost Razvijene Ciljna vrijednost Poziv Projekt 5170 1330 460 435 1340 650 Tumač: CO: zajednički pokazatelj ostvarenja; CR: zajednički pokazatelj rezultata, SR: posebni pokazatelj rezultata (u okviru EFRR-a svaka država članica / OP ima posebne pokazatelje rezultata). Prilog VII.
Outputs and results in the selection procedures and applications examined 68 ANNEX VIII Is there a selection criteria about result indicators / expected results? 
Ostvarenja i rezultati u ispitanim postupcima odabira i prijavama 70 Prilog VIII.
Are there quantified indicators in the applications? 
Sadržavaju li prijave kvantificirane pokazatelje?
Is there a selection criteria about result indicators / expected results? 
Postoje li kriteriji za odabir u pogledu pokazatelja rezultata/očekivanih rezultata?
Result indicators corresponding to those at OP level and quantified (a) 7 (b) 12 Output Results 14 the achievement of the indicators) Limited assessment of the expected results in the assessment reports (result indicator not assessed) France PON FSE 2014FR05SFOP001 8 9 But result indicators different from the OP result indicators 16 18 Not explicitely requested but this is required in the standard format application Output indicators not related to OP indicators and not quantified (Indicators different from the OP’s were also provided) 11 17 But result indicators different from the OP result indicators Only the relevance of the indicators used was assessed 12 Only qualitative information on the expected results Only relevance of the indicators used was assessed (Indicators different from the OP’s were also provided) Consistency with amount of grant Italy OP Piemonte 2014IT05SFOP013 13 14 19&20 21&22 Use of unit costs (c) NA, no info on results Italy OP Puglia 2014IT16M2OP002 15 Request for expected results only through the business plan Applications outlining expected results and their contribution to the OP objectives Assessment of the described expected results but with weaknesses 23&24 
Sadržavaju li prijave kvantificirane pokazatelje? (a) 7 (b) 12 doprinose ostvarenju pokazatelja) Ostvarenja Rezultati Ograničena procjena očekivanih rezultata u izvješćima o procjeni (pokazatelj rezultata nije procijenjen) Francuska – nacionalni OP ESF-a – 2014FR05SFOP001 8 9 (Dostavljeni su također pokazatelji koji se razlikuju od pokazatelja operativnog programa) 10 Međutim, pokazatelji rezultata razlikuju se od pokazatelja rezultata operativnog programa 11 Nije izričito zatraženo, ali potrebno je u prijavi standardnog oblika 12 18 Samo kvalitativne informacije o očekivanim rezultatima (Dostavljeni su također pokazatelji koji se razlikuju od pokazatelja operativnog programa) Procijenjena je samo relevantnost korištenih pokazatelja Procijenjena je samo relevantnost korištenih pokazatelja Dosljednost u odnosu na iznos bespovratnih sredstava Italija – OP „Piemonte” – 2014IT05SFOP013 13 14 19 i 20 21 i 22 Upotreba „jediničnih troškova” (c) —, nema informacija o rezultatima Italija – OP „Puglia” – 2014IT16M2OP002 15 23 i 24
YES Partially NO NA: not applicable Note: (a) See Annex III list of selection procedures. (b) See Annex I list of projects examined. (c) Unit costs is a methodology to determine the amount of eligible costs where this amount is equal to the output to be reached (for instance the number of places to be created in a crèche, here number of places created) multiplied by the unit cost per place. 
DA djelomično NE —: nije primjenjivo Napomena: (a) Vidi prilog III.popis postupaka odabira. (b) Vidi prilog I.popis ispitanih projekata. (c) Jedinični troškovi metodologija su za određivanje iznosa prihvatljivih troškova pri čemu je iznos jednak očekivanom ostvarenju (primjerice broj mjesta predviđenih za jaslice, ovdje broj stvorenih mjesta) pomnožen s jediničnim troškom po mjestu. Izvor: (1) Dokumentacija za postupke odabira.
(2) Applications submitted for the projects examined during this audit. 
(2) Prijave koje su podnesene za projekte koji su ispitani tijekom ove revizije.
(3) Assessment reports for these applications. 
(3) Izvješća o procjeni za navedene prijave.
REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS "SELECTION AND MONITORING FOR ERDF AND ESF PROJECTS IN THE 2014-2020 PERIOD ARE STILL MAINLY OUTPUTS-ORIENTED" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IV. 
ODGOVORI KOMISIJE NA POSEBNO IZVJEŠĆE EUROPSKOG REVIZORSKOG SUDA „ODABIR I PRAĆENJE PROJEKATA EFRR-A I ESF-A U RAZDOBLJU 2014.–2020.
The selection of projects is the exclusive responsibility of the Member States (MS). 
Države članice snose isključivu odgovornost za odabir projekata.
The monitoring arrangements, as well as the achievements reported in the Annual Implementation Reports (AIRs) and progress reports, allow to assess progress towards the objectives quantified by the output and result indicator targets as programmed in the operational programmes (OP) (which include baselines and targets). 
Mehanizmi praćenja i postignuća o kojima se izvješćuje u godišnjim izvješćima o provedbi i izvješćima o napretku omogućuju procjenu napretka ka ostvarenju ciljeva koji se mjeri na temelju ciljeva ostvarenja i pokazatelja rezultata kako su programirani u operativnim programima (OP) (koji uključuju početne vrijednosti i ciljeve).
Evaluations make it possible to assess the contribution to policy objectives. 
Na temelju evaluacija može se procijeniti doprinos ciljevima politike.
First bullet: The Commission considers that there is a difference between direct results of projects financed and the results to be achieved at the level of the OP (reflected by the result indicators). 
Prva točka: Komisija smatra da postoji razlika između izravnih rezultata financiranih projekata i rezultata koje treba ostvariti na razini OP-a (koji se temelje na pokazateljima rezultata).
As regards the basis of selecting projects, the Commission considers that in many types of assistance, it is more efficient to set quality thresholds and accept all projects that meet this threshold than to apply a method of direct comparison of applications. 
Kada je riječ o osnovi za odabir projekata, Komisija smatra da je u pogledu mnogih vrsta pomoći učinkovitije utvrditi pragove kvalitete i prihvatiti sve projekte koji zadovoljavaju taj prag nego primjenjivati metodu izravne usporedbe svih prijedloga.
The latter approach may lead to a high number of initial project applications which in itself do not necessarily result in better overall project quality and would entail unnecessary administrative burden for the managing authorities and for applicants. 
Potonji pristup može dovesti do velikog broja početnih prijedloga projekata koji sami po sebi nužno ne pridonose boljoj ukupnoj kvaliteti projekta i donijeli bi nepotrebno administrativno opterećenje za upravljačka tijela i podnositelje prijedloga projekata.
Second bullet: Audits of the monitoring systems can only be carried out in a meaningful way once sufficient data on the projects implemented has been collected, aggregated and reported to the Commission. 
Druga točka: Revizije sustava praćenja mogu se provoditi na smisleni način tek kad se prikupi dostatna količina podataka o provedenim projektima i kad se ti podaci objedine i dostave Komisiji.