natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
... (h) "final destination" means the destination on the ticket presented at the check-in counter or, in the case of directly connecting flights, the destination of the last flight; alternative connecting flights available shall not be taken into account if the original planned arrival time is respected;
(h) ,konačno odredište' znači destinacija na karti predstavljena na šalteru za registraciju putnika ili, u slučaju izravno povezanih letova, odredište zadnjeg leta; zamjenski povezani letovi koji su dostupni neće uzimati u obzir izvorno planirano vrijeme dolaska;
10 Article 5 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Cancellation', provides:
10 Članak 5. Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Otkazivanje leta", propisuje:
`1. In case of cancellation of a flight, the passengers concerned shall:
„1. U slučaju otkazivanja leta, dotični putnici:
(a) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 8; and
(a) imaju pravo na pomoć od strane stvarnog zračnog prijevoznika u skladu s člankom 8.; i
(b) be offered assistance by the operating air carrier in accordance with Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2), as well as, in event of re-routing when the reasonably expected time of departure of the new flight is at least the day after the departure as it was planned for the cancelled flight, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and
(b) imaju pravo na pomoć od strane stvarnog zračnog prijevoznika u skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 1. točkom (a) i člankom 9. stavkom 2., kao i, u slučaju preusmjeravanja kada je predviđeno vrijeme polaska novog leta najmanje jedan dan nakon vremena polaska koje je bilo planirano za otkazani let, na pomoć navedenu u članku 9. stavku 1. točki (b) i članku 9. stavku 1. točki (c); i
(i) they are informed of the cancellation at least two weeks before the scheduled time of departure; or (ii)
i. su obaviješteni o otkazivanju leta najmanje dva tjedna prije vremena polaska predviđenog redom letenja; ili
they are informed of the cancellation between two weeks and seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart No more than two hours before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than four hours after the scheduled time of arrival; or
ii. su obaviješteni o otkazivanju leta u roku od dva tjedna do sedam dana prije vremena polaska predviđenog redom letenja i ponuđeno im je preusmjeravanje koje im omogućuje da otputuju ne više od dva sata prije vremena polaska predviđenog redom letenja i da stignu u mjesto odredišta [krajnje odredište] unutar četiri sata od planiranog vremena dolaska [vremena dolaska predviđenog redom letenja]; ili
they are informed of the cancellation less than seven days before the scheduled time of departure and are offered re-routing, allowing them to depart no more than one hour before the scheduled time of departure and to reach their final destination less than two hours after the scheduled time of arrival.
iii. su obaviješteni o otkazivanju leta u roku od sedam dana prije vremena polaska predviđenog redom letenja i ponuđeno im je preusmjeravanje, čime im je omogućeno da otputuju ne više od sat vremena ranije od predviđenog vremena polaska i da stignu u mjesto odredišta unutar dva sata od planiranog vremena dolaska [vremena dolaska predviđenog redom letenja].
... 3. An operating air carrier shall not be obliged to pay compensation in accordance with Article 7, if it can prove that the cancellation is caused by extraordinary circumstances which could not have been avoided even if all reasonable measures had been taken.
3. Stvarni zračni prijevoznik nije dužan platiti odštetu u skladu s člankom 7., ako može dokazati da je do otkazivanja leta došlo zbog izvanrednih okolnosti koje se nije moglo izbjeći čak ni ako su sve razumne mjere poduzete [koje ne bi bilo moguće izbjeći čak i da su bile poduzete sve razumne mjere].
11 Article 6 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Delay', is worded as follows:
11 Članak 6. Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Kašnjenje leta", propisuje:
(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or
(a) za dva sata i više za letove od 1500 km ili kraće; ili
(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or
(b) za tri sata ili više za sve letove unutar Zajednice duže od 1500 km i za sve ostale letove između 1500 km i 3500 km; ili
(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and (ii)
i. pomoć propisanu u članku 9. stavku 1. točki (a) i članku 9. stavku 2.; i
when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c); and
ii. kada je razumno očekivano vrijeme polaska najmanje dan nakon prethodno najavljenog vremena polaska, pomoć propisanu u članku 9. stavku 1. točki (b) i članku 9. stavku 1. točki (c); i
(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).
iii. kada je kašnjenje leta najmanje pet sati, pomoć propisanu člankom 8. stavkom 1. točkom (a).
2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time-limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.'
2. U svakom slučaju, pomoć će se pružiti unutar gore propisanih vremenskih rokova, a s obzirom na svaku pojedinu kategoriju udaljenosti." 12 Članak 7.
12 Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Right to compensation', provides:
Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Pravo na odštetu", glasi:
(a) EUR 250 for all flights of 1500 kilometres or less;
(a) 250 EUR za sve letove dužine 1500 km ili kraće;
(b) EUR 400 for all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres, and for all other flights between 1500 and 3 500 kilometres;
(b) 400 EUR za sve letove unutar Zajednice, duže od 1500 km i za sve druge letove dužine između 1500 km i 3500 km;
2. When passengers are offered re-routing to their final destination on an alternative flight pursuant to Article 8, the arrival time of which does not exceed the scheduled arrival time of the flight originally booked:
2. Kada je putnicima ponuđeno preusmjeravanje do njihovog mjesta odredišta zamjenskim letom, sukladno članku 8., i kad na taj način ostvareno vrijeme dolaska ne premašuje prvotno vrijeme dolaska leta [predviđeno vrijeme dolaska prvotno rezerviranog leta]:
(a) by two hours, in respect of all flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or
(a) za 2 sata, u vezi s letovima dugim 1500 km ili kraće; [za dva sata, u slučaju svih letova dužine do 1500 km;] ili
(b) by three hours, in respect of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and for all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or
(b) za 3 sata, u vezi sa svim letovima unutar Zajednice, dužih od 1500 km i u vezi sa svim ostalim letovima između 1500 km i 3500 km; [za tri sata, u slučaju svih letova unutar Zajednice dužih od 1500 km kao i u pogledu svih ostalih letova dužine između 1500 km i 3500 km;] ili
13 Article 8 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Right to reimbursement or re-routing', is worded as follows: `1.
13 Članak 8. Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Pravo na vraćanje prevoznine ili preusmjeravanje", propisuje:
Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall be offered the choice between:
1. Upućivanjem na ovaj članak, putnicima se nudi izbor između:
(a) -- reimbursement within seven days, by the means provided for in Article 7(3), of the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought, for the part or parts of the journey not made, and for the part or parts already made if the flight is no longer serving any purpose in relation to the passenger's original travel plan, together with, when relevant, --
(a) - nadoknade u roku od 7 dana, u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 3., cjelokupnog iznosa vrijednosti karte po cijeni po kojoj je kupljena, za dio ili dijelove putovanja koji nisu realizirani i za dio, ili dijelove putovanja koji su već ostvareni, ako let više [ne] služi svrsi prvotnog plana putovanja putnika, zajedno sa, kada je to primjereno,
14 Article 9 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Right to care', is worded as follows:
14 Članak 9. Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Pravo na skrb", glasi:
`1. Where reference is made to this Article, passengers shall be offered free of charge:
„1. Pozivanjem na ovaj članak, putnici ostvaruju pravo na besplatne:
(b) hotel accommodation in cases --
(b) smještaj u hotelu u slučajevima
where a stay of one or more nights becomes necessary, or
kada je potrebno ostati jednu ili više noći, ili
-- where a stay additional to that intended by the passenger becomes necessary;
kada je potreban ostanak duži od onoga koji je putnik planirao;
2. In addition, passengers shall be offered free of charge two telephone calls, telex or fax messages, or e-mails.
2. Uz navedeno, putnici imaju pravo na dva besplatna telefonska poziva, telefaks poruke ili elektroničke poruke. [Osim navedenog, putnici imaju pravo na dva besplatna telefonska poziva ili dvije besplatne poruke teleksom, telefaksom ili elektroničkom poštom.]
3. In applying this Article, the operating air carrier shall pay particular attention to the needs of persons with reduced mobility and any persons accompanying them, as well as to the needs of unaccompanied children.'
3. U primjeni ovog članka, stvarni zračni prijevoznik posebno vodi računa o potrebama osoba sa smanjenom pokretljivošću i svim osobama u njihovoj pratnji, kao i o potrebama djece bez pratnje." 15 Članak 13.
15 Article 13 of Regulation No 261/2004, entitled `Right of redress', provides:
Uredbe br. 261/2004, naslovljen „Pravo regresa", propisuje:
`In cases where an operating air carrier pays compensation or meets the other obligations incumbent on it under this Regulation, no provision of this Regulation may be interpreted as restricting its right to seek compensation from any person, including third parties, in accordance with the law applicable.
„U slučajevima gdje stvarni zračni prijevoznik plaća odštetu ili izvršava druge obveze koje proizlaze iz ove Uredbe, niti jedna odredba iz ove Uredbe ne može se protumačiti na način koji bi ograničavao njegovo pravo da zatraži odštetu od bilo koje osobe, uključujući treću stranu u skladu s primjenljivim pravom.
In particular, this Regulation shall in no way restrict the operating air carrier's right to seek reimbursement from a tour operator or another person with whom the operating air carrier has a contract.
Posebno se ovom Uredbom, ni na koji način, ne ograničava pravo stvarnog zračnog prijevoznika da traži nadoknadu od tour operatora ili od druge osobe s kojom zračni prijevoznik ima ugovor.
Similarly, no provision of this Regulation may be interpreted as restricting the right of a tour operator or a third party, other than a passenger, with whom an operating air carrier has a contract, to seek reimbursement or compensation from the operating air carrier in accordance with applicable relevant laws.'
Sukladno tome, niti jedna odredba iz ove Uredbe ne može se protumačiti na način koji bi ograničavao prava tour operatora ili treće osobe, ako ta treća osoba nije putnik, a s kojom zračni prijevoznik ima ugovor, da potražuje nadoknadu ili odštetu od zračnog prijevoznika u skladu s relevantnim primjenljivim propisima."
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Glavni postupci i prethodna pitanja
16 Mrs Folkerts held a reservation to fly from Bremen to Asunción, via Paris and São Paulo.
16 L.-T. Folkerts imala je rezervaciju za let iz Bremena za Asunción preko Pariza i São Paula.
17 In accordance with the original planning, Mrs Folkerts' flight was scheduled to depart from Bremen on 16 May 2006 at 6.30 am and arrive in Asunción, her final destination, the same day at 11.30 pm.
17 U skladu s prvotnim planom, bilo je predviđeno da L.-T. Folkerts krene letom iz Bremena 16. svibnja 2006. u 6.30 i stigne u Asunción, koji je bio njezino krajnje odredište, istog dana u 23.30.
18 The departure of the flight from Bremen to Paris, operated by the company Air France, was delayed and the aircraft took off only shortly before 9.00 am, that is a delay of approximately two and a half hours beyond the scheduled departure time.
18 Let Air Francea iz Bremena u Pariz kasnio je u odlasku i zrakoplov je uzletio tek nešto prije 9.00, što je kašnjenje od približno dva i pol sata u odnosu na planirano vrijeme odlaska.
Mrs Folkerts, who already had her boarding cards for the entire journey on departure from Bremen, did not reach Paris until after Air France's aircraft scheduled for the connecting flight to São Paulo had already departed.
L.-T. Folkerts, koja je pri odlasku iz Bremena već imala svoje ukrcajne karte za cjelokupno putovanje, stigla je u Pariz tek kada je Air Franceov zrakoplov koji je bio planiran kao povezani let do São Paula već otišao.
Mrs Folkerts was re-booked by Air France on to a later flight to São Paulo.
Društvo Air France izdalo je gospođi L.-T. Folkerts novu rezervaciju za kasniji let do São Paula.
Because of her late arrival in São Paulo, Mrs Folkerts missed the connecting flight to Asunción originally scheduled.
Zbog svog zakašnjelog dolaska u São Paulo, L.-T. Folkerts je propustila prvotno planirani povezani let za Asunción.
She therefore did not arrive in Asunción until 17 May 2006 at 10.30 am, that is 11 hours after the arrival time originally scheduled.
Radi toga je stigla u Asunción tek 17. svibnja 2006. u 10.30, to jest jedanaest sati nakon prvotno planiranog vremena dolaska.
19 At first instance and then on appeal, Air France was ordered to pay Mrs Folkerts damages, including, in particular, a sum of EUR 600 under Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 261/2004.
19 U prvostupanjskom postupku i potom u žalbenom postupku, društvu Air France je bilo naloženo da gospođi L.-T. Folkerts isplati odštetu uključujući, posebno, iznos od 600 EUR u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 1. točkom (c) Uredbe br. 261/2004.
20 Air France then brought an appeal on a point of law before the Bundesgerichtshof (German Federal Court of Justice).
20 Društvo Air France je potom podnijelo zahtjev za reviziju („Revision") Bundesgerichtshofu (Savezni vrhovni sud).
21 The Bundesgerichtshof considers that the outcome of that action depends on whether Mrs Folkerts is entitled to compensation from Air France pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004.
21 Sud koji je uputio zahtjev smatra da ishod tog postupka ovisi o tome ima li L.-T. Folkerts pravo na odštetu od društva Air France na temelju članka 7. Uredbe br. 261/2004.
22 The Bundesgerichtshof takes the view that Mrs Folkerts is entitled to compensation in the amount of EUR 600 only if the case-law of the Court of Justice (Joined Cases C-402/07 and C-432/07 Sturgeon and Others [2009] ECR I-10923 - according to which passengers have the right to compensation under Article 7(1) of Regulation No 261/2004 also in the event of long delay - is also applicable to cases where, although there was not yet any delay beyond the scheduled departure within the terms of Article 6(1) of that regulation, the final destination was nonetheless reached three hours or more after the arrival time originally scheduled.
22 Sud koji je uputio zahtjev smatra da L.-T. Folkerts ima pravo na odštetu u iznosu od 600 EUR samo ako se sudska praksa Suda (presuda od 19. studenoga 2009., Sturgeon i dr., spojeni predmeti C-402/07 i C-432/07, Zb., str. I-10923.) - prema kojoj putnici imaju pravo na odštetu temeljem članka 7. stavka 1. Uredbe br. 261/2004 i u slučajevima dugog kašnjenja - primjenjuje također na slučajeve u kojima se, iako nije bilo kašnjenja u odnosu na planirano vrijeme odlaska u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. navedene uredbe, na konačno odredište unatoč tome stiglo tri sata ili više nakon prvotno planiranog vremena dolaska.
23 Therefore, in the Bundesgerichtshof's view, the question of whether the right to compensation advanced by Mrs Folkerts is well founded depends on whether Article 7(1) of Regulation No 261/2004 may be relied on even where there is no delay within the terms of Article 6(1) of that regulation.
23 Stoga po mišljenju suda koji je uputio zahtjev pitanje je li pravo na odštetu koju je zatražila L.-T. Folkerts utemeljeno ovisi o tome može li se članak 7. stavak 1. Uredbe br. 261/82004 primijeniti čak i u slučaju kada nema kašnjenja u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. navedene uredbe.
The Bundesgerichtshof takes the view that it is not clear from the grounds of the judgment in Sturgeon and Others whether, for the purpose of entitlement to compensation under Article 7(1) of Regulation No 261/2004, the length of the delay in reaching the final destination alone is determinant or whether entitlement to compensation for such a delay additionally requires that the conditions set out in Article 6(1) of that regulation be met, that is to say, that the departure of the flight in question was already delayed beyond the limits set out in Article 6(1).
Sud koji je uputio zahtjev smatra da, u smislu prava na odštetu u skladu s člankom 7. stavkom 1. Uredbe br. 261/2004, iz obrazloženja presude u predmetu Sturgeon i dr. nije jasno, je li odlučujuća sama duljina kašnjenja pri dolasku na konačno odredište ili se za pravo na odštetu za takvo kašnjenje dodatno zahtijeva da budu ispunjeni uvjeti navedeni u članku 6. stavku 1. te uredbe, to jest, da je odlazak dotičnog leta već kasnio u odnosu na granice navedene u članku 6. stavku 1.
24 In those circumstances the Bundesgerichtshof decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
24 U tim je okolnostima sud koji je uputio zahtjev odlučio prekinuti postupak i Sudu postaviti sljedeća prethodna pitanja:
`(1) Does a passenger have a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004 in the case where departure of his flight was delayed for a period which is below the limits specified in Article 6(1) of that regulation, but arrival at the final destination was at least three hours later than the scheduled arrival time?
„1. Ima li putnik pravo na odštetu u skladu s člankom 7. Uredbe br. 261/2004 u slučaju klada je odlazak njegovog leta kasnio manje od graničnih vrijednosti navedenih u članku 6. stavku 1. navedene Uredbe, ali je dolazak na konačno odredište kasnio najmanje tri sata u odnosu na planirano vrijeme dolaska?
(2) If the first question is answered in the negative:
2. Ako bi na prvo pitanje valjalo odgovoriti niječno:
For the purpose of determining whether there was a delay, within the terms of Article 6(1) of Regulation No 261/2004, in the case of a flight consisting of several stages, should reference be made to the individual stages or to the distance to the final destination?'
Treba li za potrebe utvrđivanja, je li u slučaju leta koji se sastoji od nekoliko faza postojalo kašnjenje u smislu članka 6. stavka 1. Uredbe br. 261/2004, uzeti u obzir pojedinačne faze ili udaljenost do konačnog odredišta?"
25 By its first question the Bundesgerichtshof asks, in essence, whether Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004 must be interpreted as meaning that compensation is payable, on the basis of that article, to a passenger on connecting flights who has been delayed at departure for a period below the limits specified in Article 6 of that regulation, but has arrived at his final destination at least three hours later than the scheduled arrival time.
25 Svojim prvim pitanjem sud koji je uputio zahtjev u biti pita treba li članak 7. Uredbe 261/2004 tumačiti tako da se odšteta temeljem tog članka isplaćuje putniku koji putuje povezanim letovima i koji je u polasku kasnio manje od graničnih vrijednosti navedenih u članku 6. te uredbe, ali je na svoje konačno odredište stigao najmanje tri sata kasnije od planiranog vremena dolaska.
26 In the first place, it must be recalled that, as is apparent from Article 1(1) thereof, the purpose of Regulation No 261/2004 is to grant minimum rights to air passengers when faced with three different types of situation, namely, when they are denied boarding against their will, when their flights are cancelled and, lastly, when their flights are delayed.
26 Na prvom mjestu, valja podsjetiti da je svrha Uredbe br. 261/2004, kako proizlazi iz njezinog članka 1. stavka 1., davanje minimalnih prava zrakoplovnim putnicima kada se nađu u tri različite vrste situacija, to jest, kada im se uskrati ukrcaj protivno njihovoj volji, kada su njihovi letovi otkazani i, konačno, kada njihovi letovi kasne. 27 Iz članka 2.
27 It is apparent from Article 2 of Regulation No 261/2004, setting out definitions for the purposes of that regulation, that, unlike denied boarding and flight cancellation, flight delay is not itself defined in that article.
Uredbe br. 261/2004, u kojem se navode definicije za potrebe te Uredbe, vidljivo je da, za razliku od uskraćenog ukrcaja i otkazivanja leta, kašnjenje leta kao takvo u tom članku nije definirano.
28 In addition, it should be noted that Regulation No 261/2004 contemplates two different types of flight delay.
28 Osim toga, valja napomenuti da se u Uredbi br. 261/2004 razmatraju dvije različite vrste kašnjenja leta.
29 First, in some contexts, such as the delay provided for in Article 6 of Regulation No 261/2004, that regulation refers only to a flight's being delayed beyond its scheduled departure time.
29 Prvo, u nekim kontekstima, poput kašnjenja predviđenog člankom 6. Uredbe br. 261/2004, ta se uredba odnosi samo na let koji kasni u odnosu na njegovo planirano vrijeme odlaska.
30 Second, in other contexts, Regulation No 261/2004 deals with the situation where arrival at the final destination has been delayed.
30 Drugo, u drugim kontekstima, Uredbom br. 261/2004 uređuje se situacija u kojoj je došlo do kašnjenja pri dolasku na konačno odredište.
Thus, in Article 5(1)(c)(iii) of Regulation No 261/2004, the European Union legislature draws legal consequences from the fact that the passengers whose flights have been cancelled and who are offered re-routing by an air carrier reach their final destination a certain amount of time after the cancelled flight's scheduled time of arrival.
Tako člankom 5. stavkom 1. točkom (c) podtočkom iii. Uredbe br. 261/2004 zakonodavac Europske unije predviđa pravne posljedice temeljem činjenice da putnici čiji su letovi otkazani i kojima je zračni prijevoznik ponudio preusmjeravanje stižu na svoje konačno odredište određeno vrijeme nakon planiranog vremena dolaska otkazanog leta.
31 In that connection, it should be noted that the reference, in Regulation No 261/2004, to different types of delay is compatible with Article 19 of the Montreal Convention, that convention being an integral part of the EU legal order (see Case C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA [2006] ECR I-403, paragraph 36, and Case C-63/09 Walz [2010] ECR I-4239, paragraphs 19 and 20).
31 U vezi s tim valja napomenuti da je upućivanje na različite vrste kašnjenja u Uredbi br. 261/2004 u skladu s člankom 19. Montrealske konvencije, koja je sastavni dio pravnog poretka Unije (vidjeti presude od 10. siječnja 2006., IATA i ELFAA, C-344/04, Zb., str. I-403., t. 36. i od 6. svibnja 2010., Walz, C-63/09, Zb., str. I-4239., t. 19. i 20.).
Article 19 of the Montreal Convention refers to the concept of `delay in the carriage by air of passengers', without specifying at which stage of such carriage the delay in question must occur.
Članak 19. Montrealske konvencije upućuje na pojam „kašnjenje u zračnom prijevozu putnika" ne određujući u kojoj se fazi takvog prijevoza dotično kašnjenje mora dogoditi.