natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its submission, the obligations flowing from Articles 4 and 6 of Directive 75/442 and Articles 5 and 12 of Directive 78/319 are fulfilled only if the plans prescribed by those directives are adopted and actually implemented.
Prema stajalištu Komisije, obveze koje proizlaze iz članaka 4. i 6. Direktive 75/442 i članaka 5. i 12. Direktive 78/319 ispunjene su samo ako su planovi i programi propisani tim direktivama doneseni i stvarno provedeni. 53 Iz informacija koje je dostavila grčka vlada proizlazi da je plan zbrinjavanja otpada predviđen člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i program zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđen člankom 12.
53 It states that it is clear from the information provided by the Greek Government that the waste disposal plan required by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and the plan for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste required by Article 12 of Directive 78/319 were still at a preliminary stage and that the river Kouroupitos continued to serve as a site for the uncontrolled disposal of waste from the Chania area.
Direktive 78/319 još uvijek u preliminarnoj fazi te da rijeka Kouroupitos još uvijek služi kao lokacija za nekontrolirano odlaganje otpada iz prefekture Chania.
54 The Greek Government points out that a Member State might very well have drawn up and notified to the Commission the plans prescribed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 without, however, having taken the necessary measures required by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319.
54 Grčka vlada ističe da je neka država članica mogla izraditi planove i programe predviđene člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319 te o njima obavijestiti Komisiju bez da je, međutim, poduzela potrebne mjere predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 5. Direktive 78/319.
Conversely, a Member State could have taken the necessary measures required by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319 without having drawn up and given notification of the plans prescribed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319, in which case the failure to fulfil obligations would relate solely to the latter provisions.
Suprotno tome, država članica mogla je poduzeti potrebne mjere predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 5. Direktive 78/319, a da nije izradila planove i programe propisane člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319. te da nije o njima obavijestila Komisiju, u kojem bi se slučaju povreda obveza odnosila samo na te posljednje odredbe.
55 It should be noted that, whilst Article 4 of Directive 75/442 did not specify the actual content of the measures to be taken in order to ensure that waste is disposed of without endangering human health and without harming the environment, it was none the less binding on the Member States as to the objective to be achieved, while leaving to them a margin of discretion in assessing the need for such measures (Commission v Italy, cited above, paragraph 67).
55 Valja istaknuti da iako članak 4. Direktive 75/442 nije precizirao stvarni sadržaj mjera koje se trebaju poduzeti kako bi se osiguralo da se otpad zbrinjava na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu, on je ipak obvezivao države članice u pogledu cilja koji se treba postići, ostavljajući im diskrecijske ovlasti u procjeni potrebe za takvim mjerama (gore navedena presuda od 9. studenoga, Komisija/Italija, t. 67.).
56 Thus the Court has held that a significant deterioration in the environment over a protracted period when no action has been taken by the competent authorities is in principle an indication that the Member State concerned has exceeded the discretion conferred on it by that provision (Commission v Italy, paragraph 68).
56 Zbog toga Sud tvrdi da znatno pogoršanje stanja okoliša tijekom produljenog razdoblja za vrijeme kojeg nadležna tijela nisu poduzela nikakve mjere, u načelu predstavlja naznaku da je država članica na koju se to odnosi prekoračila diskrecijske ovlasti koje su joj dodijeljene tom odredbom (gore navedena presuda od 9. studenoga, Komisija/Italija, t. 68.).
57 The same analysis can be made as regards Article 5 of Directive 78/319.
57 Jednaka se analiza može izvesti u pogledu članka 5. Direktive 78/319.
58 In addition, the obligations flowing from Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and Article 5 of Directive 78/319 were independent of the more specific obligations contained in Articles 5 to 11 of Directive 75/442 concerning the planning, organisation and supervision of waste disposal operations and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 concerning the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste.
58 Nadalje valja utvrditi da su obveze koje proizlaze iz članka 4. Direktive 75/442 i članka 5. Direktive 78/319 neovisne u odnosu na detaljnije obveze sadržane u odredbama članaka 5. do 11. Direktive 75/442 o planiranju, organizaciji i nadzoru postupaka zbrinjavanja otpada kao i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 o zbrinjavanju toksičnog i opasnog otpada.
The same is true of the corresponding obligations under Directive 75/442 as amended and Directive 91/689.
Jednako vrijedi i za odgovarajuće obveze na temelju Direktive 75/442, kako je izmijenjena, te Direktive 91/689.
59 Accordingly, in order to determine whether the Hellenic Republic has satisfied the obligation to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91, it must be established in turn whether each of the obligations found by that judgment not to have been fulfilled has, in so far as those obligations are mutually independent, since been complied with.
59 Prema tome, kako bi se utvrdilo je li Helenska Republika ispunila obvezu postupanja u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka, valja utvrditi sukcesivno je li ispunjena svaka pojedinačna obveza iz navedene presude za koju je utvrđena povreda u mjeri u kojoj su te obveze međusobno neovisne.
Compliance with the obligations flowing from Article 171(1) of the Treaty
Poštovanje obveza koje proizlaze iz članka 171. stavka 1. Ugovora
60 The Greek Government argues in defence that the volume of waste which continues to be tipped in the Kouroupitos ravine has decreased significantly because some of the waste is landfilled at appropriate sites located in four sub-prefectures of the prefecture of Chania (Sfakia, Kalives, Selino and Kissamo) and a paper sorting and recycling system has been set up.
60 Grčka vlada u svojoj obrani tvrdi da se obujam otpada koji se i dalje odbacuje u klanac rijeke Kouroupitos znatno smanjio jer se jedan dio otpada odlaže na odgovarajuće lokacije smještene u četiri okruga prefekture Chania (Sfakia, Kalives, Selino i Kissamo) i jer je uveden sustav odvajanja i recikliranja papira.
61 Toxic and hazardous waste from the American military base at Souda has not been deposited in the Kouroupitos ravine since 1996, but is entrusted to a private undertaking which transports it abroad in order for it to be treated.
61 Toksičan i opasan otpad iz američke vojne baze Souda ne odlaže se u klanac rijeke Kouroupitos od 1996., već je povjeren privatnom poduzeću koje ga prevozi na obradu u inozemstvo.
That is also the case with hospital waste, which is loaded into a special vehicle and stored in a cold chamber until it is incinerated.
Jednako se postupa i s bolničkim otpadom koji se utovaruje na posebno vozilo i skladišti u hladnoj komori do spaljivanja pirolizom.
As for sediments of hydrocarbons, the Greek Government affirms that they are stored in an appropriate place until they are sent abroad.
Što se tiče naslaga ugljikovodika, grčka vlada uvjerava da se one skladište na odgovarajuće mjesto dok ne budu poslane u inozemstvo.
Used mineral oils are passed to the Chania prefectorial authorities for transportation to a reclamation plant, while tankers no longer deposit the contents of septic tanks into the Kouroupitos as a biological sewage treatment plant has been built in the Chania area.
Korištena mineralna ulja prosljeđuju se upravnim tijelima prefekture Chania radi prijevoza do postrojenja za regeneraciju, dok cisterne više ne ispuštaju sadržaj septičkih jama u rijeku Kouroupitos budući da je u prefekturi Chania izgrađeno postrojenje za biološku obradu kanalizacijskog otpada.
62 It should be remembered that the present proceedings stem from a complaint received by the Commission on 22 September 1987, drawing its attention to uncontrolled waste disposal in the mouth of the river Kouroupitos, on the Akrotiri peninsula, by the majority of the municipalities in the prefecture of Chania.
62 U tom pogledu prvenstveno valja podsjetiti da ovaj postupak proizlazi iz prigovora koji je Komisiji 22. rujna 1987. uputila većina općina u prefekturi Chania, skrećući pozornost na nekontrolirano odlaganje otpada na ušću rijeke Kouroupitos, na poluotoku Akrotiri.
The waste included refuse from military bases in the area, hospitals and clinics, and residues from salt factories, poultry farms, slaughterhouses and all the industrial sites in the area.
Taj otpad sadržava otpad iz vojnih baza na tom području, bolnica i klinika te otpad iz tvornica soli, peradarskih farmi, klaonica i svih industrijskih postrojenja iz tog područja.
63 In a study produced to the Court by the Greek Government entitled Environmental Impact of Uncontrolled Solid Waste Combustion in the Kouroupitos Ravine, Crete, which was carried out in June 1996 by the Laboratory of Environmental Engineering and Management of the Technical University of Crete, in collaboration with the Institute of Ecological Chemistry, Munich, it is stated:
63 U studiji koju je u lipnju 1996. proveo Laboratorij za tehnologiju i upravljanje okolišem Tehničkog fakulteta na Kreti u suradnji s Institutom za ekološku kemiju iz Münchena pod nazivom „Učinak na okoliš nekontroliranog izgaranja krutog otpada u klancu rijeke Kouroupitosa na Kreti", a koju je grčka vlada predočila Sudu, navodi se: „[...]
... The solid wastes are disposed of in the Kouroupitos ravine located approximately 30 km east of Chania, on the Akrotiri peninsula.
Krupni se otpad odlaže u klancu rijeke Kouroupitos koji je smješten otprilike 30 kilometara istočno od Chanie, na poluotoku Akrotiri.
The wastes are dumped into the ravine from the top at a distance of 200 m from the sea without any other care.
Otpad se baca u klanac s njegova vrha na udaljenosti od 200 metara od mora bez ikakvih mjera opreza.
The wastes have been uncontrollably burning for at least 10 years, while the burning is self-supporting due to the high levels of organic matter.
Otpad nekontrolirano izgara već najmanje posljednjih 10 godina, a zbog visokih razina organske tvari radi se o procesu samostalnog izgaranja.
The improper waste disposal combined with the uncontrolled burning of the solid wastes has resulted in an environmentally hazardous situation, with the leachate seeping into the [sea], and the products of the burning process being transferred both to land and sea.
Takvo neprimjereno odlaganje otpada u kombinaciji s nekontroliranim izgaranjem krutog otpada dovelo je do situacije koja je opasna po okoliš jer procjedne vode cure u [more], a produkti procesa izgaranja šire se na tlo i u more."
64 As regards, first, fulfilment of the obligation imposed by Article 4 of Directive 75/442 to dispose of waste without endangering human health and without harming the environment, the Greek Government does not dispute that solid waste, in particular household refuse, is still tipped into the river Kouroupitos.
64 Prvo, u pogledu ispunjavanja obveze zbrinjavanja otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu predviđene člankom 4. Direktive 75/442, grčka vlada ne osporava da se krupni otpad, a posebno otpad iz kućanstava, još uvijek odlaže u rijeku Kouroupitos.
65 It is clear from the letters from the Prefecture of Chania to the Ministry of the Environment of 7 May and 18 August 1998, disclosed by the Greek Government, that most of the waste still ends up, in the same uncontrolled and unlawful manner, in the Kouroupitos ravine, which today receives all the household waste from the urban area of Chania.
65 Iz dopisa koji su iz prefekture Chania 7. svibnja i 18. kolovoza 1998. poslani Ministarstvu okoliša i o kojima je grčka vlada izdala obavijest jasno je da većina otpada još uvijek na nekontrolirani i nezakonit način završava u klancu rijeke Kouroupitos koji danas prima sav otpad iz kućanstava gradskog područja Chanie.
66 The Greek Government concedes in its rejoinder that in any event, only the definitive solution to the problem, that is to say discontinuing the operation at the river Kouroupitos and introducing a modern, lawful and effective system, could be regarded as fully satisfactory.
66 Grčka vlada u svojem odgovoru na repliku priznaje da se „u svakom slučaju samo konačno rješenje problema, a to je zaustavljanje radnji na rijeci Kouroupitos i uvođenje modernog, zakonitog i učinkovitog sustava, može smatrati u potpunosti zadovoljavajućim".
67 Moreover, it is apparent from paragraph 10 of the judgment in Case C-45/91 that the Greek Government had stated on 15 March 1988 in reply to the Commission that it was going to put an end to the operation of that tip after August 1988 and create new disposal sites.
67 Štoviše, iz točke 10. gore navedene presude Komisija/Grčka proizlazi da je grčka vlada već u odgovoru Komisiji od 15. ožujka 1988. izjavila da namjerava zaustaviti odlaganje na tom odlagalištu nakon kolovoza 1988. i otvoriti nova odlagališta otpada.
68 The fact remains that that has still not been done.
68 Valja utvrditi da to još uvijek nije učinjeno.
69 It is true that, according to the Greek Government, the competent authorities, which have planned to establish and put into operation a mechanical recycling and composting plant and a landfill site at Strongilo Kefali in the municipality of Khordakios, have come up against opposition from the members of the public concerned, in the form of complaints and actions brought before the competent administrative and judicial authorities challenging the administrative decisions concerning the location of the two installations.
69 Točno je da su prema tvrdnjama grčke vlade nadležna tijela koja na lokaciji „Strongilo Kefali" u općini Khordakios planiraju uspostaviti i staviti u pogon postrojenje za mehaničko recikliranje i kompostiranje kao i sanitarno odlagalište otpada naišla na protivljenje pojedinaca na koje se to odnosi u obliku prigovora i tužbi nadležnim upravnim i pravosudnim tijelima osporavajući upravne odluke o lokaciji dvaju postrojenja.
70 However, as has already been pointed out in paragraph 21 of the judgment in Case C-45/91, it is settled case-law that a Member State may not plead internal circumstances, such as difficulties of implementation which emerge at the stage when a Community measure is put into effect, to justify a failure to comply with obligations and time-limits laid down by Community law.
70 Međutim, kako je već istaknuto u točki 21. navedene presude Komisija/Grčka, u skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom država članica se ne može pozivati na unutarnje okolnosti poput poteškoća u provođenju nastalih u fazi provedbe akta Zajednice, kako bi opravdala nepoštovanje obveza i vremenskih rokova predviđenih pravom Zajednice.
71 It must therefore be held that the Hellenic Republic has not complied with the judgment in Case C-45/91 inasmuch as it persists in failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 4 of Directive 75/442 as regards adoption of the measures necessary to ensure that waste is disposed of in the area of Chania without endangering human health and without harming the environment.
71 Prema tome valja utvrditi da Helenska Republika nije postupila u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka u mjeri u kojoj i dalje traje povreda obveza na temelju članka 4. Direktive 75/442 u pogledu donošenja potrebnih mjera koje bi osigurale da se otpad zbrine na području prefekture Chania na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu.
72 As regards, second, fulfilment of the obligation imposed by Article 5 of Directive 78/319 to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste without endangering human health and without harming the environment, the Greek Government's assertion that toxic and dangerous waste have not been tipped into the river Kouroupitos since 1996 is supported by consideration of the file.
72 Drugo, u pogledu ispunjavanja obveze zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu, predviđene člankom 5. Direktive 78/319, valja utvrditi da studija priložena spisu dokazuje tvrdnju grčke vlade da se toksičan i opasan otpad više ne deponira u rijeku Kouroupitos.
Its assertion is disputed only partially by the Commission, which concedes that the quantities of toxic and dangerous waste have been reduced.
Komisija, koja priznaje da su se smanjile količine toksičnog i opasnog otpada, samo djelomično osporava navedenu tvrdnju.
73 It is for the Commission in such circumstances to provide the Court, in the course of the proceedings, with the information necessary to determine the extent to which a Member State has complied with a judgment declaring it to be in breach of its obligations.
73 U tim okolnostima valja napomenuti da Komisija u okviru ovog postupka treba Sudu osigurati potrebne informacije kako bi odredio u kojoj je mjeri država članica postupila u skladu s presudom u kojoj su utvrđene povrede njezinih obveza.
74 Since no such information is available, it has not been proved that the Hellenic Republic has failed fully to comply with the obligation to dispose of toxic and dangerous waste from the area of Chania in accordance with Article 5 of Directive 78/319.
74 Budući da takve informacije nisu dostupne, valja napomenuti da nije dokazano da Helenska Republika nije u potpunosti ispunila obvezu zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada iz prefekture Chania u skladu s odredbama članka 5. Direktive 78/319.
75 As regards, third, fulfilment of the obligations to draw up waste disposal plans and to draw up, and keep up to date, plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste, imposed by Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 respectively, it is settled case-law that incomplete practical measures or fragmentary legislation cannot discharge the obligation of a Member State to draw up a comprehensive programme with a view to attaining certain objectives (Case C-298/97 Commission v Spain [1998] ECR I-3301, paragraph 16).
75 Treće, s obzirom na izvršenje obveze izrade i ažuriranja planova za zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada predviđene člankom 6. Direktive 75/442 i člankom 12. Direktive 78/319, treba utvrditi da u skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom država članica ne može ispuniti obvezu izrade sveobuhvatnih programa radi postizanja određenih ciljeva pomoću nepotpunih praktičnih mjera ili fragmentarnog zakonodavstva (presuda od 28. svibnja 1998., Komisija/Španjolska, C-298/97, Zb., str. I-3301., t. 16.).
76 Contrary to the claims of the Greek Government, legislation or specific measures amounting only to a series of ad hoc normative interventions that are incapable of constituting an organised and coordinated system for the disposal of waste and toxic and dangerous waste cannot be regarded as plans which the Member States are required to adopt under Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 (see, by analogy, Case C-214/96 Commission v Spain [1998] ECR I-7661, paragraph 30).
76 Suprotno tvrdnjama grčke vlade zakon ili konkretne mjere koje se sastoje samo od niza ad hoc normativnih intervencija koje ne predstavljaju organiziran i koordiniran sustav za zbrinjavanje otpada i toksičnog i opasnog otpada ne mogu se smatrati planovima koje države članice moraju donijeti na temelju članka 6. Direktive 75/442 i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 (vidjeti, analogijom, presudu od 25. studenoga 1998., Komisija/Španjolska, C-214/96, Zb., str. I-7661., t. 30.).
77 It therefore follows that the Hellenic Republic has likewise failed to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 inasmuch as it persists in failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 6 of Directive 75/442 and Article 12 of Directive 78/319 so far as concerns the drawing up of waste management plans and plans for the disposal of toxic and dangerous waste.
77 Slijedom navedenoga valja napomenuti da Helenska Republika nije postupila ni u skladu s gore navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka u mjeri u kojoj i dalje postoji povreda obveza koje ona ima na temelju članka 6. Direktive 75/442 i članka 12. Direktive 78/319 u pogledu izrade planova gospodarenja otpadom i planova zbrinjavanja toksičnog i opasnog otpada.
78 On the basis of all the foregoing considerations it must be held that, by failing to take the measures necessary to ensure that waste is disposed of in the area of Chania without endangering human health and without harming the environment in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 75/442 and by failing to draw up for that area plans for the disposal of waste, pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 75/442, and of toxic and dangerous waste, pursuant to Article 12 of Directive 78/319, the Hellenic Republic has not implemented all the necessary measures to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91 and has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 171 of the Treaty.
78 Na temelju svih gore navedenih razmatranja valja utvrditi da Helenska Republika nije poduzela sve potrebne mjere za postupanje u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka te je tako povrijedila svoje obveze na temelju članka 171. Ugovora jer nije poduzela potrebne mjere kako bi osigurala zbrinjavanje otpada na području prefekture Chania na način koji ne ugrožava zdravlje ljudi i ne šteti okolišu u skladu s člankom 4. Direktive 75/442 i jer nije izradila planove za zbrinjavanje otpada za to područje u skladu s člankom 6. Direktive 75/442, te zbrinjavanje toksičnog i opasnog otpada u skladu s člankom 12. Direktive 78/319.
Setting of the penalty payment
Određivanje novčane kazne
79 Relying on the method of calculation set out in its memorandum 96/C 242/07 of 21 August 1996 on applying Article 171 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1996 C 242, p.
79 Oslanjajući se na metodu izračuna utvrđenu u obavijestima 96/C 242/07 od 21. kolovoza 1996. o primjeni članka 171. Ugovora (SL C 242, str.
6) and its communication 97/C 63/02 of 28 February 1997 on the method of calculating the penalty payments provided for pursuant to Article 171 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1997 C 63, p. 2), the Commission has proposed that the Court should, in respect of failure to comply with the judgment in Case C-45/91, impose a penalty payment of ECU 24 600 for each day of delay from the date of notification of the present judgment until the breach of obligations has been remedied.
6.) i 97/C 63/02 od 28. veljače 1997. o metodi izračuna novčane kazne predviđene na temelju članka 171. Ugovora o EZ-u (SL C 63, str. 2.), Komisija predlaže Sudu da zbog nepostupanja u skladu s navedenom presudom Komisija/Grčka naloži novčanu kaznu od 24 600 ECU po danu zakašnjenja od dana obavijesti o ovoj presudi do prestanka povrede obveze.
The Commission contends that a financial penalty in the form of a periodic penalty payment is the most appropriate means of achieving the objective of compliance with the judgment as soon as possible.
Komisija smatra da je novčana kazna u obliku dnevne novčane kazne najprimjereniji način postizanja cilja, a to je da država članica što je prije moguće postupi u skladu s presudom Komisija/Grčka.
80 The Greek Government claims that the Court should set the penalty payment on the basis of coefficients of seriousness and duration which are more favourable to the Hellenic Republic than those applied by the Commission.
80 Grčka vlada zahtijeva od Suda da odredi novčanu kaznu na temelju koeficijenata težine i trajanja povrede koji su za Helensku Republiku povoljniji od onih koje je primijenila Komisija.