natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5 According to Article 1(a) of Directive 2004/38, the directive concerns inter alia ‘the conditions governing the exercise of the right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States by Union citizens and their family members’.
5 U skladu s člankom 1. točkom (a) Direktive 2004/38, Direktiva se, među ostalim, odnosi na „uvjete pod kojima građani Unije i članovi njihovih obitelji ostvaruju pravo na slobodno kretanje i boravak unutar državnog područja država članica”.
6 According to Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2004/38, for the purposes of the directive, ‘family member’ means inter alia the spouse.
6 U skladu s člankom 2. stavkom 2. točkom (a) Direktive 2004/38, u smislu Direktive, „član obitelji” znači, među ostalim, bračni drug.
7 Article 3 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Beneficiaries’, provides in paragraph 1:
7 Člankom 3. Direktive 2004/38, „Nositelji prava”, u njegovom stavku 1. određuje se:
‘This Directive shall apply to all Union citizens who move to or reside in a Member State other than that of which they are a national, and to their family members as defined in point 2 of Article 2 who accompany or join them.’
„Ova se Direktiva primjenjuje na sve građane Unije koji se useljavaju ili borave u državi članici različitoj od one koje su državljani i na članove njihovih obitelji, u smislu članka 2. točke 2. ove Direktive, koji ih prate ili im se pridružuju.”
8 Article 5 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Right of entry’, states:
8 Člankom 5. Direktive 2004/38, „Pravo na ulazak”, pojašnjava se:
‘1. Without prejudice to the provisions on travel documents applicable to national border controls, Member States shall grant Union citizens leave to enter their territory with a valid identity card or passport and shall grant family members who are not nationals of a Member State leave to enter their territory with a valid passport.
„1. Ne dovodeći u pitanje odredbe o putnim ispravama koje se primjenjuju pri nadzoru državne granice, države članice odobravaju ulazak na svoje područje građanima Unije s važećom osobnom iskaznicom ili putovnicom te članovima obitelji koji nisu državljani države članice s važećom putovnicom.
2. Family members who are not nationals of a Member State shall only be required to have an entry visa in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 or, where appropriate, with national law. For the purposes of this Directive, possession of the valid residence card referred to in Article 10 shall exempt such family members from the visa requirement.
2. Od članova obitelji koji nisu državljani države članice zahtijeva se ulazna viza samo u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br. 539/2001 ili, prema potrebi, nacionalnim zakonodavstvom. Za potrebe ove Direktive, posjedovanje važeće dozvole boravišne iskaznice iz članka 10. ove Direktive oslobađa te članove obitelji od obveze pribavljanja vize.
5. The Member State may require the person concerned to report his/her presence within its territory within a reasonable and non-discriminatory period of time. Failure to comply with this requirement may make the person concerned liable to proportionate and non-discriminatory sanctions.’
5. Država članica može od te osobe zahtijevati da prijavi svoju prisutnost na njezinom državnom području u razumnom i nediskriminirajućem roku. Nepoštovanje ovog zahtjeva može dovesti do proporcionalnih i nediskriminirajućih sankcija protiv dotične osobe.”
9 Article 7 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Right of residence for more than three months’, states:
9 Člankom 7. Direktive 2004/38, „Pravo na boravak dulji od tri mjeseca”, pojašnjava se:
‘1. All Union citizens shall have the right of residence on the territory of another Member State for a period of longer than three months if they:
„1. Svi građani Unije imaju pravo na boravak na državnom području druge države članice u razdoblju duljem od tri mjeseca ako:
"(a) are workers or self-employed persons in the host Member State; or"
"(a) su radnici ili samozaposlene osobe u državi članici domaćinu; ili"
"(b) have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence and have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State; or"
"(b) imaju dostatna sredstva za sebe i članove svoje obitelji da ne postanu teret za sustav socijalne pomoći države članice domaćina tijekom svog razdoblja boravka te su sveobuhvatno zdravstveno osigurani u državi članici domaćinu; ili"
"(c) – are enrolled at a private or public establishment, accredited or financed by the host Member State on the basis of its legislation or administrative practice, for the principal purpose of following a course of study, including vocational training; and"
(c) – su upisani u privatnu ili javnu ustanovu, ovlaštenu ili financiranu od države članice domaćina na temelju njezinog zakonodavstva ili upravne prakse, s glavnom svrhom školovanja, uključujući strukovno osposobljavanje, te
"– have comprehensive sickness insurance cover in the host Member State and assure the relevant national authority, by means of a declaration or by such equivalent means as they may choose, that they have sufficient resources for themselves and their family members not to become a burden on the social assistance system of the host Member State during their period of residence; …"
"– su sveobuhvatno zdravstveno osigurani u državi članici domaćinu, te putem izjave ili drugim jednakovrijednim sredstvom, relevantnom nacionalnom tijelu zajamče da imaju dostatna sredstva za sebe i članove svoje obitelji kako tijekom svojeg razdoblja boravka ne bi postali teret za sustav socijalne pomoći države članice domaćina; …"
2. The right of residence provided for in paragraph 1 shall extend to family members who are not nationals of a Member State, accompanying or joining the Union citizen in the host Member State, provided that such Union citizen satisfies the conditions referred to in paragraph 1(a), (b) or (c).
2. Pravo na boravak predviđeno u stavku 1. obuhvaća članove obitelji koji nisu državljani države članice, a koji su u pratnji građanina Unije ili mu se pridružuju u državi članici domaćinu, pod uvjetom da taj građanin Unije ispunjava uvjete iz stavka 1. točke (a), (b) ili (c).
10 Article 9 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Administrative formalities for family members who are not nationals of a Member State’, provides:
10 Člankom 9. Direktive 2004/38, „Administrativne formalnosti za članove obitelji koji nisu državljani države članice”, utvrđuje se:
‘1. Member States shall issue a residence card to family members of a Union citizen who are not nationals of a Member State, where the planned period of residence is for more than three months.
„1 Država članica izdaje boravišnu iskaznicu članovima obitelji građanina Unije koji nisu građani države članice, ako je planirano trajanje boravka dulje od tri mjeseca.
2. The deadline for submitting the residence card application may not be less than three months from the date of arrival.
2 Rok za podnošenje zahtjeva za izdavanje boravišne iskaznice ne smije biti kraći od tri mjeseca od datuma dolaska.
3. Failure to comply with the requirement to apply for a residence card may make the person concerned liable to proportionate and non-discriminatory sanctions.’
3. Nepoštovanje obveze podnošenja zahtjeva za izdavanje boravišne iskaznice može dovesti do proporcionalnih i nediskriminirajućih sankcija protiv dotične osobe.”
11 Article 10 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Issue of residence cards’, provides:
11 Člankom 10. Direktive 2004/38, „Izdavanje boravišne iskaznice”, utvrđuje se:
‘1. The right of residence of family members of a Union citizen who are not nationals of a Member State shall be evidenced by the issuing of a document called “Residence card of a family member of a Union citizen” no later than six months from the date on which they submit the application. A certificate of application for the residence card shall be issued immediately.
„1. Pravo na boravak članova obitelji građanina Unije koji nisu državljani države članice evidentira se izdavanjem isprave pod nazivom ,Boravišna iskaznica za člana obitelji građanina Unijeʼ najkasnije šest mjeseci od datuma podnošenja zahtjeva. Potvrda o podnošenju zahtjeva za izdavanje boravišne iskaznice izdaje se odmah.
2. For the residence card to be issued, Member States shall require presentation of the following documents:
2. Države članice za izdavanje boravišne iskaznice zahtijevaju predočavanje sljedećih isprava:
"(a) a valid passport;"
"(a) važeće putovnice;"
"(b) a document attesting to the existence of a family relationship or of a registered partnership;"
"(b) isprave kojom se potvrđuje postojanje obiteljske veze ili registriranog partnerstva;"
"(c) the registration certificate or, in the absence of a registration system, any other proof of residence in the host Member State of the Union citizen whom they are accompanying or joining;"
"(c) potvrde o prijavi ili ako sustav prijava ne postoji, bilo kojeg drugog dokaza o boravku u državi članici domaćinu za građanina Unije u čijoj su pratnji ili mu se pridružuju;"
"(d) in cases falling under points (c) and (d) of Article 2(2), documentary evidence that the conditions laid down therein are met;"
"(d) u slučajevima iz članka 2. stavka 2. točaka (c) i (d), dokumentiranih dokaza da su ispunjeni uvjeti utvrđeni u toj odredbi;"
12 Article 27 of Directive 2004/38, which appears in Chapter VI of the directive, ‘Restrictions on the right of entry and the right of residence on grounds of public policy, public security or public health’, provides in paragraphs 1 and 2:
12 Člankom 27. Direktive 2004/38, koji se nalazi u Poglavlju VI. Direktive, „Ograničenja prava na ulazak i prava na boravak zbog razloga javnog poretka, javne sigurnosti ili javnog zdravlja”, utvrđuje se u njegovim stavcima 1. i 2.:
‘1. Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, Member States may restrict the freedom of movement and residence of Union citizens and their family members, irrespective of nationality, on grounds of public policy, public security or public health. These grounds shall not be invoked to serve economic ends.
„1. Podložno odredbama ovog poglavlja, države članice mogu ograničiti slobodu kretanja i boravka građanima Unije i članovima njihovih obitelji, bez obzira na njihovo državljanstvo, zbog razloga javnog poretka, javne sigurnosti ili javnog zdravlja. Na ove razloge ne može se pozivati u gospodarske svrhe.
2. Measures taken on grounds of public policy or public security shall comply with the principle of proportionality and shall be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned. Previous criminal convictions shall not in themselves constitute grounds for taking such measures.
2. Mjere poduzete zbog razloga javnog poretka ili javne sigurnosti moraju biti u skladu s načelom proporcionalnosti i temeljiti se isključivo na osobnom ponašanju dotičnog pojedinca. Ranije osiđujuće kaznene presude same po sebi ne predstavljaju razloge za poduzimanje takvih mjera.
The personal conduct of the individual concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society. Justifications that are isolated from the particulars of the case or that rely on considerations of general prevention shall not be accepted.’
Osobno ponašanje dotičnog pojedinca mora predstavljati stvarnu, trenutačnu i dostatno ozbiljnu prijetnju koja utječe [na] neki od temeljnih interesa društva. Obrazloženja koja nisu povezana s pojedinačnim slučajem ili se odnose na opću prevenciju nisu prihvatljiva. ”
13 Article 35 of Directive 2004/38, ‘Abuse of rights’, provides:
13 Člankom 35. Direktive 2004/38, „Zlouporaba prava”, utvrđuje se:
‘Member States may adopt the necessary measures to refuse, terminate or withdraw any right conferred by this Directive in the case of abuse of rights or fraud, such as marriages of convenience. Any such measure shall be proportionate and subject to the procedural safeguards provided for in Articles 30 and 31.’
„Države članice mogu donijeti potrebne mjere radi odbijanja, ukidanja ili opoziva prava koja proizlaze iz ove Direktive u slučaju zlouporabe prava ili prijevare, poput fiktivnih brakova. Sve su takve mjere proporcionalne i podliježu postupovnim jamstvima predviđenima u člancima 30. i 31. ”
14 As stated in Article 38 of Directive 2004/38, it repealed inter alia Articles 10 and 11 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1968 (II), p. 475), as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2434/92 of 27 July 1992 (OJ 1992 L 245, p. 1) (‘Regulation No 1612/68’).
14 Kao što proizlazi iz njezinog članka 38., Direktivom 2004/38 stavljeni su izvan snage među ostalim članci 10. i 11. Uredbe (EEZ) br. 1612/68 Vijeća od 15. listopada 1968. o slobodi kretanja radnika unutar Zajednice (SL L 257, str. 2.) (SL, posebno izdanje na engleskom jeziku 1968. (II.), str. 475.), kako je izmijenjena Uredbom Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2434/92 od 27. srpnja 1992. (SL L 245, str. 1.) (u daljnjem tekstu: Uredba br. 1612/68).
15 At the material time, Directive 2004/38 was transposed into Irish law by the European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) (No 2) Regulations 2006, which were made on 18 December 2006 and entered into force on 1 January 2007 (‘the 2006 Regulations’).
15 U vrijeme nastanka činjenica u glavnom postupku Direktiva 2004/38 bila je prenesena u irsko pravo Uredbom iz 2006. o slobodnom kretanju osoba u Europskim zajednicama [European Communities (Free Movement of Persons) (br. 2) Regulations 2006], koja je donesena 18. prosinca 2006. i stupila na snagu 1. siječnja 2007. (u daljnjem tekstu: Uredba iz 2006.).
16 Regulation 3(1) and (2) of the 2006 Regulations provides:
16 Člankom 3. stavcima .1. i 2. Uredbe iz 2006. utvrđuje se:
‘(1) These Regulations shall apply to –
„(1) Ova se Uredba primjenjuje na:
(a) Union citizens,
(a) građane Unije,
(b) subject to paragraph (2), qualifying family members of Union citizens who are not themselves Union citizens, and
(b) podložno stavku 2., članove obitelji građana Unije koji ispunjavaju kriterije, a koji sami nisu građani Unije i
(c) subject to paragraph (2), permitted family members of Union citizens.
(c) podložno stavku 2., dopuštene članove obitelji građana Unije.
(2) These Regulations shall not apply to a family member unless the family member is lawfully resident in another Member State and is –
(2) Ova se Uredba primjenjuju na člana obitelji samo ako član obitelji zakonito boravi u nekoj drugoj državi članici i –
(a) seeking to enter the State in the company of a Union citizen in respect of whom he or she is a family member, or
(a) želi ući u državu u pratnji građanina Unije kojemu je član obitelji ili
(b) seeking to join a Union citizen, in respect of whom he or she is a family member, who is lawfully present in the State.’
(b) želi se pridružiti građaninu Unije kojemu je član obitelji, koji zakonito boravi u državi. ”
17 ‘Qualifying family members of Union citizens’ within the meaning of Regulation 3 of the 2006 Regulations include spouses of Union citizens.
17 „Članovi obitelji građana Unije koji ispunjavaju kriterije” u smislu članka 3. Uredbe iz 2006. uključuju bračne drugove građana Unije.
The Metock case
Predmet Metock
18 Mr Metock, a national of Cameroon, arrived in Ireland on 23 June 2006 and applied for asylum. His application was definitively refused on 28 February 2007.
18 B. B. Metock, državljanin Kameruna, u Irsku je stigao 23. lipnja 2006. i podnio zahtjev za azil. Njegov je zahtjev konačno odbijen 28. veljače 2007.
19 Ms Ngo Ikeng, born a national of Cameroon, has acquired United Kingdom nationality. She has resided and worked in Ireland since late 2006.
19 H. E. Ngo Ikeng, rođena kao državljanka Kameruna, dobila je državljanstvo Ujedinjene Kraljevine. U Irskoj boravi i radi od kraja 2006. godine.
20 Mr Metock and Ms Ngo Ikeng met in Cameroon in 1994 and have been in a relationship since then. They have two children, one born in 1998 and the other in 2006. They were married in Ireland on 12 October 2006.
20 B. B. Metock i H. E. Ngo Ikeng upoznali su se 1994. u Kamerunu i od tada su u vezi. Imaju dvoje djece, jedno rođeno 1998. i drugo 2006. Vjenčali su se u Irskoj 12. listopada 2006.
21 On 6 November 2006 Mr Metock applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Union citizen working and residing in Ireland. The application was refused by decision of the Minister for Justice of 28 June 2007, on the ground that Mr Metock did not satisfy the condition of prior lawful residence in another Member State required by Regulation 3(2) of the 2006 Regulations.
21 6. studenoga 2006. B. B. Metock podnio je zahtjev za boravišnu iskaznicu kao bračni drug građanke Unije koja radi i boravi u Irskoj. Zahtjev je odbijen odlukom Ministera for Justice od 28. lipnja 2007. jer B. B. Metok nije ispunjavao uvjet prethodnog zakonitog boravka u nekoj drugoj državi članici u skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 2. Uredbe iz 2006.
22 Mr Metock, Ms Ngo Ikeng and their children brought proceedings against that decision.
22 B. B. Metock, H. E. Ngo Ikeng i njihova djeca podnijeli su tužbu protiv te odluke.
The Ikogho case
Predmet Ikogho
23 Mr Ikogho, a national of a non-member country, arrived in Ireland in November 2004 and applied for asylum. His application was definitively refused and the Minister for Justice made a deportation order against him on 15 September 2005. A challenge to the deportation order was dismissed by order of the High Court of 19 June 2007.
23 H. Ikogho, državljanin treće zemlje, stigao je u Irsku u studenome 2004. i podnio zahtjev za politički azil. Njegov je zahtjev konačno odbijen i Minister for Justice donio je 15. rujna 2005. odluku o njegovu protjerivanju. Žalba na odluku o protjerivanju odbijena je rješenjem High Courta od 19. lipnja 2007.
24 Mrs Ikogho, who is a United Kingdom national and a Union citizen, has resided and worked in Ireland since 1996.
24 D. Ikogho, koja je državljanka Ujedinjene Kraljevine i građanka Unije, u Irskoj boravi i radi od 1996.
25 Mr and Mrs Ikogho met in Ireland in December 2004 and were married there on 7 June 2006.
25 H. i D. Ikogho upoznali su se u Irskoj u prosincu 2004. i tamo vjenčali 7. lipnja 2006.
26 On 6 July 2006 Mr Ikogho applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Union citizen residing and working in Ireland. His application was refused by decision of the Minister for Justice of 12 January 2007, on the ground that, by reason of the deportation order of 15 September 2005, Mr Ikogho was staying in Ireland illegally at the time of his marriage.
26 H. Ikogho je 6. srpnja 2006. podnio zahtjev za boravišnu iskaznicu kao bračni drug građanke Unije koja boravi i radi u Irskoj. Njegov je zahtjev odbijen odlukom Minister for Justice od 12. siječnja 2007. zbog toga što je H. Ikogho, uzimajući u obzir odluku o protjerivanju od 15. rujna 2005., u Irskoj nezakonito boravio u vrijeme sklapanja braka.
27 Mr and Mrs Ikogho brought proceedings against that decision.
27 H. i D. Ikogho podnijeli su tužbu protiv te odluke.
The Chinedu case
Predmet Chinedu
28 Mr Chinedu, a Nigerian national, arrived in Ireland in December 2005 and applied for asylum. His application was definitively refused on 8 August 2006. Ms Babucke, of German nationality, is lawfully resident in Ireland.
28 R. Chinedu, nigerijski državljanin, došao je u Irsku u prosincu 2005. i podnio zahtjev za politički azil. Njegov je zahtjev konačno odbijen 8. kolovoza 2006. M. Babucke, njemačka državljanka, zakonito boravi u Irskoj.
29 Mr Chinedu and Ms Babucke were married in Ireland on 3 July 2006.
29 R. Chinedu i M. Babucke vjenčali su se u Irskoj 3. srpnja 2006.
30 By application received by the Minister for Justice on 1 August 2006, Mr Chinedu applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Union citizen. The application was refused by decision of the Minister for Justice of 17 April 2007, on the ground that Mr Chinedu did not satisfy the condition of prior lawful residence in another Member State required by Regulation 3(2) of the 2006 Regulations.
30 Zahtjevom koji je Minister for Justice zaprimio 1. kolovoza 2006. R. Chinedu zatražio je boravišnu iskaznicu kao bračni drug građanke Unije. Zahtjev je odbijen odlukom Ministera for Justice od 17. travnja 2007. jer R. Chinedu nije ispunio uvjet prethodnog zakonitog boravka u nekoj drugoj državi članici u skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 2. Uredbe iz 2006.
31 Mr Chinedu and Ms Babucke brought proceedings against that decision.
31 R. Chinedu i B. Babucke podnijeli su tužbu protiv te odluke.
The Igboanusi case
Predmet Igboanusi
32 Mr Igboanusi, a Nigerian national, arrived in Ireland on 2 April 2004 and applied for asylum. His application was refused on 31 May 2005 and the Minister for Justice made a deportation order against him on 15 September 2005.
32 H. Igboanusi, nigerijski državljanin, došao je u Irsku 2. travnja 2004. i podnio zahtjev za politički azil. Njegov je zahtjev odbijen 31. svibnja 2005., a Minister for Justice donio je odluku o protjerivanju 15. rujna 2005.
33 Ms Batkowska, a Polish national, has resided and worked in Ireland since April 2006.
33 R. Batkowska, poljska državljanka, boravi i radi u Irskoj od travnja 2006.
34 Mr Igboanusi and Ms Batkowska met in Ireland and were married there on 24 November 2006.
34 H. Igboanusi i R. Batkowska upoznali su se u Irskoj i tamo vjenčali 24. studenoga 2006.
35 On 27 February 2007 Mr Igboanusi applied for a residence card as the spouse of a Union citizen. His application was refused by decision of the Minister for Justice of 27 August 2007, on the ground that Mr Igboanusi did not satisfy the condition of prior lawful residence in another Member State required by Regulation 3(2) of the 2006 Regulations.
35 H. Igboanusi je 27. veljače 2007. podnio zahtjev za boravišnu iskaznicu kao bračni drug građanke Unije. Njegov je zahtjev odbijen odlukom Minister for Justice od 27. kolovoza 2007. jer H. Igboanusi nije zadovoljio uvjet prethodnog zakonitog boravka u nekoj drugoj državi članici u skladu s člankom 3. stavkom 2. Uredbe iz 2006.
36 Mr Igboanusi and Ms Batkowska brought proceedings against that decision.
36 H. Igboanusi i R. Batkowska podnijeli su tužbu protiv te odluke.
37 On 16 November 2007 Mr Igboanusi was arrested and detained pursuant to the deportation order against him. He was deported to Nigeria in December 2007.
37 H. Igboanusi je 16. studenoga 2007. uhićen i zadržan u skladu s odlukom o njegovom protjerivanju. Deportiran je u Nigeriju u prosincu 2007.
The main proceedings and the order for reference
Glavni postupak i zahtjev za prethodnu odluku
38 The four cases were heard together before the national court.
38 Ta su četiri predmeta spojena u jedan glavni postupak pred nacionalnim sudom.
39 All the applicants in the main proceedings submitted essentially that Regulation 3(2) of the 2006 Regulations is not compatible with Directive 2004/38.
39 Svi podnositelji zahtjeva u glavnom su postupku u biti tvrdili da članak 3. stavak 2. Uredbe iz 2006. nije spojiv s Direktivom 2004/38.
40 They argued that nationals of non-member countries who are spouses of Union citizens have a right, consequential to and dependent on that of the Union citizen, to move and reside in a Member State other than that of which the Union citizen is a national, a right which derives from the family relationship alone.
40 Tvrdili su da državljani trećih zemalja koji su bračni drugovi građana Unije imaju pravo, koje proizlazi iz prava građanina Unije i ovisi o tom pravu, slobodno se kretati i boraviti u nekoj drugoj državi članici različitoj od one čiji je građanin Unije državljanin, što je pravo koje proizlazi iz samog obiteljskog odnosa.