natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whilst pharmacies marketing their products by internet can cherry-pick, concentrating on certain economically attractive market segments, traditional pharmacies, bound by the ABO, are subject to a set of costly obligations, including maintaining a full range of products, stocking a minimum quantity of medicines and providing a duty service.
Dok ljekarne koje stavljaju svoje proizvode u promet putem interneta imaju mogućnost „pokupiti vrhnjeˮ, koncentrirajući se na određene ekonomski privlačne segmente tržišta, tradicionalne ljekarne, koje obavezuje ABO, podliježu nizu skupih obveza, uključujući održavanje potpunog asortimana proizvoda, stvaranje minimalne količine zaliha lijekova i pružanje usluge dežurstva.
That entails distortion of the conditions of competition.
To podrazumijeva narušavanje uvjeta tržišnog natjecanja.
86 More specifically, the Apothekerverband submits that, as regards prescription medicines, all German pharmacies are obliged by law to charge the prices set by the ABO, reached by applying increases to the manufacturers' prices, which the latter are free to set.
86 Apothekerverband posebno naglašava da, u pogledu lijekova koji se izdaju na recept, sve njemačke ljekarne imaju obvezu po zakonu zaračunavati cijene koje je odredio ABO, koje se postižu povećanjem prodajnih cijena proizvođača, koje potonji slobodno određuju.
By contrast, undertakings selling medicinal products by mail order from abroad are not subject to the requirements of the ABO and take advantage of that to offer a limited range of products, essentially composed of expensive medicines, which they offer at prices that are competitive in comparison with those in traditional pharmacies.
Suprotno tome, poduzeća koja prodaju lijekove poštanskom narudžbom iz inozemstva ne podliježu zahtjevima ABO-a i koriste to da bi ponudila ograničen asortiman proizvoda, koji se u biti sastoji od skupih lijekova koje nude po cijenama koje su konkurentne u usporedbi s onima u tradicionalnim ljekarnama.
87 Consequently, in the Apothekerverband's submission, the prohibition on selling medicines by mail order forms an integral part of the social security system, the aim of which is to ensure that a reliable and balanced supply of medicines is available to the general public at any time.
87 Zato je prema mišljenju Apothekerverbanda zabrana prodaje lijekova putem poštanske narudžbe sastavni dio sustava socijalne sigurnosti, čiji je cilj osigurati pouzdanu i uravnoteženu opskrbu lijekovima, dostupnu svima u bilo koje vrijeme.
The prohibition cannot be modified or abolished in isolation unless the system as a whole is reviewed.
Ta zabrana se ne može mijenjati niti ukidati odvojeno bez revidiranja sustava kao cjeline.
In that regard, the Apothekerverband mentions the considerations developed by the Court in Case C-368/98 Vanbraekel and Others [2001] ECR I-5363, paragraphs 47 to 49, and Case C-157/99 Smits and Peerbooms [2001] ECR I-5473, paragraphs 72 to 74, relating to safeguarding the social security system and a balanced hospital and medical service.
U tom pogledu, Apothekerverband se poziva na razmatranja o zaštiti sustava socijalne sigurnosti te uravnotežene zdravstvene i bolničke usluge, kako ih je predstavio Sud u presudama od 12. srpnja 2001., Vanbraekel i dr. (C-368/98, Zb., str. I-5363., t. 47. do 49.) i Smits i Peerbooms (C-157/99, Zb., str. I-5473., t. 72. do 74.).
88 The Greek Government supports that view, pointing out the importance placed on the method of distributing medicines in pharmacies and the role of the pharmacist both by the Court's case-law and by certain Community law provisions (see Commission v Germany , paragraph 20, and Council Directive 85/432/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 1985 L 253, p. 34) and Council Directive 85/433/EEC of 16 September 1985 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 1985 L 253, p. 37)).
88 Grčka vlada podržava to stajalište i upozorava na važnost koja se pridaje načinu distribucije lijekova u ljekarnama i ulozi ljekarnika kroz sudsku praksu Suda i određenim odredbama prava Zajednice (vidjeti navedenu presudu Komisija/Njemačka, t. 20. i Direktivu Vijeća 85/432/EEZ od 16. rujna 1985. o usklađivanju zakona i drugih propisa u vezi s određenim djelatnostima u području farmacije (SL L 253, str. 34.) te Direktivu Vijeća 85/433/EEZ od 16. rujna 1985. o uzajamnom priznavanju diploma, svjedodžaba i drugih dokaza o formalnoj osposobljenosti iz farmacije, uključujući mjere za olakšavanje učinkovitog izvršavanja prava poslovnog nastana koje se odnose na određene aktivnosti iz područja farmacije (SL L 253, str. 37.)).
89 The Irish Government favours an outright prohibition on the sale of prescription medicines over the internet.
89 Irska vlada podupire potpunu zabranu izdavanja lijekova na recept putem interneta.
It recognises that checking the authenticity of prescriptions is facilitated by the local knowledge and experience of pharmacists who are in close and daily contact with patients and doctors in their region.
Priznaje da lokalno znanje i iskustvo olakšavaju provjeru autentičnosti liječničkih recepata ljekarnicima koji su u stalnom i svakodnevnom kontaktu s pacijentima i liječnicima u svojoj regiji.
Allowing prescription medicines to be supplied following receipt of a prescription and without any other control would greatly increase the risk of prescription fraud or misuse.
Omogućavanje da se lijekovi koji se izdaju na recept dostavljaju na temelju prethodno primljenog recepta i bez bilo koje druge kontrole značajno bi povećalo rizik od prijevare ili zlouporabe recepta.
Furthermore, doctors usually only prescribe medicines which are available to their patients and therefore prescribe medicines which are authorised in the Member State in which they practise.
Osim toga tvrdi da liječnici načelno propisuju samo lijekove koji su dostupni njihovim pacijentima i stoga propisuju lijekove koji su odobreni na području države članice u kojoj ti liječnici obavljaju praksu.
However, a doctor may prescribe a medicine not authorised in the Member State in which he practises if he is aware that the medicine may be obtained from an internet pharmacy.
Međutim, liječnik može propisati lijek i koji nije odobren u državi članici u kojoj obavlja praksu ako zna da se lijek može dobiti u internetskoj ljekarni.
In that way, prescription medicines unauthorised in a Member State may be marketed in that Member State without the authorities being informed that that is the case.
Na taj se način lijekovi koji nisu odobreni u državi članici mogu stavljati u promet u toj državi članici bez da su tijela te države o tome obaviještena.
90 The defendants in the main proceedings put forward a number of arguments against the dangers allegedly posed by the sale of medicinal products by mail order.
90 Tuženici u glavnom postupku iznose niz argumenata protiv opasnosti koje bi navodno predstavljala prodaja lijekova poštanskom narudžbom.
First, the guarantee that the customer will receive expert advice from the pharmacist when the medicine is supplied does not provide justification for an all-out prohibition on mail-order sales, on the basis of Article 30 EC.
Najprije, jamstvo da će korisnik dobiti stručan savjet od ljekarnika pri izdavanju lijeka ne daje opravdanje za potpunu zabranu prodaje putem poštanske narudžbe u skladu s člankom 30. UEZ-a.
The pharmacist can also advise and monitor when he is not in the presence of the customer but sends the customer the medicines after having given him thorough advice and carefully checked the order.
Ljekarnik može također savjetovati i nadgledati i kad se ne nalazi u nazočnosti korisnika te poslati korisniku lijekove nakon što ga je detaljno savjetovao i pažljivo provjerio narudžbu.
91 The defendants in the main proceedings add that in the case of an internet order the customer has the opportunity to contact the pharmacist by telephone or in writing (for example, by e-mail).
91 Tuženici u glavnom postupku dodaju da u trenutku narudžbe putem interneta korisnik ima mogućnost kontaktirati ljekarnika telefonom ili pisanim putem (na primjer, putem elektroničke pošte).
The quality of the advice given in that way may even be superior to that of normal pharmaceutical advice given directly to the customer in the pharmacy.
Kvaliteta savjeta koji se daju na taj način može biti čak veća nego kod uobičajenog farmaceutskog savjetovanja u ljekarni u prisutnosti korisnika.
92 The argument that the virtual pharmacist is not in a position to take the initiative in giving advice is not justified.
92 Prema mišljenju tuženika u glavnom postupku, tvrdnja da virtualni ljekarnik ne može sam preuzeti inicijativu za savjetovanje nije utemeljena.
The necessary information about taking the medicine, or using it appropriately, is provided in writing by the pharmacist when the medicine is dispatched.
Potrebne informacije o uzimanju lijeka ili o njegovom ispravnom korištenju ljekarnik daje pisanim putem pri otpremi lijeka.
That initiative may be backed up, should the need arise, by a telephone call from the pharmacy to the customer.
Tu inicijativu ljekarna može prema potrebi nadopuniti telefonskim pozivom korisniku.
93 As to the alleged need for the physical presence of the customer when a medicine is purchased, the defendants in the main proceedings also observe that a great many consumers do not come to the pharmacy in person to collect their medicines.
93 Po pitanju navodne fizičke prisutnosti korisnika pri kupnji lijeka, tuženici u glavnom postupku navode da mnogi korisnici ne dolaze osobno u ljekarnu podići svoje lijekove.
94 Second, as regards the alleged lack of control of virtual pharmacies, the defendants in the main proceedings submit that such pharmacies are subject to State supervision and to requirements that orders be checked internally.
94 Na drugom mjestu, u pogledu navodnog pomanjkanja kontrole virtualnih ljekarni, tuženici u glavnom postupku tvrde da te ljekarne podliježu nadzoru države i zahtjevima interne kontrole narudžbi.
First, DocMorris is subject to supervision by the competent authorities in the Member State of origin, namely the State inspector of Netherlands pharmacies.
S jedne strane, DocMorris podliježe nadzoru nadležnih tijela svoje države članice podrijetla, i to nizozemskog državnog inspektora za ljekarne.
That supervision covers all procedures and operations carried out in the course of operating the pharmacy and selling medicines by mail order.
Taj nadzor uključuje sve postupke i aktivnosti pri vođenju ljekarne i prodaji lijekova putem poštanske narudžbe.
Second, under Netherlands law, all pharmacies must record their internal security rules and operational procedures in a quality manual.
S druge strane, prema nizozemskom pravu, sve ljekarne moraju evidentirati svoja interna sigurnosna pravila i operativne postupke u priručniku o kvaliteti.
DocMorris complies with the rules of the European Association of Mail Service Pharmacies of which it is a member, which contain more detailed provisions on the question of checking orders, packaging and receipt.
DocMorris poštuje pravila European Association of Mail Service Pharmacies čiji je član, koja sadržavaju detaljnije odredbe u vezi s provjerom narudžbi, pakiranja i primitka.
95 The internal security measures imposed by DocMorris ensure that the processing of orders and the provision of advice are solely within the purview of authorised pharmacists and qualified pharmaceutical technicians and comply with certain quality requirements.
95 Unutarnje sigurnosne mjere koje je uveo DocMorris osiguravaju da je obrada narudžbi i davanje savjeta isključivo u domeni ovlaštenih farmaceuta i kvalificiranih farmaceutskih tehničara uz poštovanje određenih zahtjeva kvalitete.
The fact that the purchase of a medicinal product takes place in a pharmacy in another Member State is not relevant given that the conditions for access to the profession of pharmacist and those relating to the exercise of the profession are harmonised at Community level (see, in relation to Directive 85/432, Schumacher , paragraph 20, and Commission v Germany , paragraph 19).
Činjenica da se kupovina lijeka odvija u ljekarni u drugoj državi članici nije relevantna s obzirom da su uvjeti za pristup profesionalnom ljekarniku i oni koji se odnose na obavljanje djelatnosti usklađeni na razini Zajednice (vidjeti, u vezi s Direktivom 85/432, presude Schumacher, t. 20. i Komisija/Njemačka, t. 19.).
96 Third, concerning the risks linked to prescription medicines, the pharmacist, in accordance with the requirements of the European Association of Mail Service Pharmacies, must ensure that medicines are sent only where the pharmacy concerned has received the original prescription, issued by a doctor or a dentist, and only where the person who will receive the product is actually the prescription holder.
96 Treće, u pogledu rizika povezanog s lijekovima koji se izdaju na recept, ljekarnik mora u skladu sa zahtjevima European Association of Mail Service Pharmacies osigurati da se lijekovi šalju samo nakon što dotična ljekarna primi originalni recept koji je izdao liječnik ili zubar i samo kad je osoba koja će primiti proizvod u stvari vlasnik recepta.
97 Since the conditions in which a medicinal product must be subject to a doctor's prescription have been harmonised (see Directive 92/26, as replaced by Title VI of the Community Code), there is a uniform level of protection throughout the Community.
97 S obzirom da su uvjeti po kojima lijek podliježe liječničkom receptu usklađeni (vidjeti Direktivu 92/26, kako je zamijenjena glavom VI. zakonika Zajednice), postoji jedinstvena razina zaštite diljem Zajednice.
Where, exceptionally, the classification of the medicine in the Member State of origin differs from that in the importing Member State, DocMorris always proceeds on the basis of the most stringent national legislation, so that national rules concerning the need for a prescription are never evaded.
Kada se u iznimnim slučajevima klasifikacija lijeka u državi članici podrijetla razlikuje od one u državi članici uvoza, DocMorris uvijek postupa na temelju najstrožeg nacionalnog zakonodavstva, tako da se nikad ne zaobilaze nacionalni propisi o izdavanju liječničkog recepta.
98 Fourth, given the advanced stage of harmonisation of provisions concerning the authorisation of medicinal products within the Community and the system of mutual recognition laid down thereby (see Regulation No 2309/93, and Directive 93/39 and Commission Directive 2000/38/EC of 5 June 2000 amending Chapter Va (Pharmacovigilance) of Council Directive 75/319/EEC on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 139, p. 28)), it is appropriate to start from the principle that a medicinal product which is authorised in one Member State cannot give rise to health risks which are so serious that they warrant an absolute ban on any cross-border mail-order trade in medicines.
98 Četvrto, s obzirom na visoku razinu usklađenosti odredbi u vezi s odobravanjem lijekova unutar Zajednice i na sustav uzajamnog priznavanja koji postoji u Zajednici (vidjeti Uredbu br. 2309/93, Direktivu 93/39 i Direktivu Komisije 2000/38/EZ od 5. lipnja 2000. o izmjeni poglavlja V.a (Farmakovigilancija) Direktive Vijeća 75/319/EEZ o usklađivanju odredaba utvrđenih zakonom i drugim propisima koji se odnose na gotove lijekove (SL L 139, str. 28.)), valjalo bi početi od načela da lijekovi koji su odobreni u jednoj državi članici ne mogu biti uzrok zdravstvenih rizika koji su toliko ozbiljni da opravdavaju apsolutnu zabranu prekogranične trgovine lijekova poštanskom narudžbom.
99 Fifth, nor does the use of the internet give rise to any additional health risks, which can be avoided only by an absolute prohibition on mail-order business in medicinal products.
99 Peto, niti uporaba inteneta ne može biti uzrok dodatnih zdravstvenih rizika koji se mogu izbjeći samo apsolutnom zabranom trgovine lijekovima putem poštanske narudžbe.
However, the technical potential of the internet, in particular the ability to prepare customised interactive pages, can be used in order to ensure optimum health protection.
Međutim, tehničke mogućnosti interneta, a posebno one koje omogućuju sposobnost izrade interaktivnih stranica koje su prilagođene pojedinom korisniku, mogu se koristiti za osiguranje najbolje zaštite zdravlja.
100 Finally, the prohibition at issue in the main proceedings is not justified on the ground that it ensures, from an economic point of view, that the population at large is supplied with medicinal products commensurate with its needs.
100 Naposljetku, zabrana u predmetu u glavnom postupku nije opravdana zato što s gospodarskog stajališta osigurava široku opskrbu stanovništva lijekovima prilagođenu njegovim potrebama.
In that regard, the defendants in the main proceedings maintain that, since any virtual pharmacy must be approved in the same way as a pharmacy to which the public has access in the Member State in which it is established, the ability to sell medicinal products by mail order must not be perceived as an alternative in competition with pharmacies open to the public but as an offer complementing sales by the latter.
U tom smislu, tuženici u glavnom postupku tvrde da, s obzirom da svaka virtualna ljekarna mora biti odobrena na isti način kao i javna ljekarna u državi članici u kojoj ima sjedište, mogućnost prodaje lijekova poštanskom narudžbom ne smije se smatrati konkurencijom javnim ljekarnama, već ponudom koja nadopunjava prodaju potonjih.
Since they are bound by national requirements applicable in the Member State of origin, virtual pharmacists are precluded from confining themselves to selling a range of expensive products.
S obzirom da ih obvezuju nacionalni zahtjevi koji se primjenjuju u državi članici podrijetla, isključeno je da bi se „virtualni ljekarnik" ograničio na prodaju asortimana proizvoda po višim cijenama.
101 The defendants in the main proceedings conclude that neither the German Government nor the Apothekerverband has shown that cross-border mail-order trade in medicinal products constitutes a danger to health, which can be avoided only by an absolute prohibition on that type of business.
101 Tuženici u glavnom postupku zaključuju da ni njemačka vlada ni Apothekerverband nisu dokazali da prekogranična prodaja lijekova poštanskom narudžbom predstavlja opasnost za zdravlje koja se može izbjeći samo apsolutnom zabranom takve vrste poslovanja.
In reality, health may be protected just as effectively by appropriate rules, in particular by requirements relating to the control of orders, packaging and receipt, as imposed by the Member State from which the medicinal products come.
U stvarnosti se zdravlje može zaštititi jednako tako učinkovito odgovarajućim propisima, a posebno zahtjevima u pogledu kontrole narudžbi, pakiranja i njegovog primitka, kako ih nalaže država članica iz koje lijekovi dolaze.
102 As is maintained by the parties to the main action, the Member States which have submitted observations to the Court and the Commission, Article 30 EC continues to apply in relation to the manufacture and marketing of specialised pharmaceutical products as long as harmonisation of national rules has not been fully achieved in those areas (see Schumacher , paragraph 15; Delattre , paragraph 48; Eurim-Pharm , paragraph 26; Commission v Germany , paragraph 10; and Ortscheit , paragraph 14).
102 Kako tvrde stranke u glavnom postupku, države članice koje su podnijele očitovanja Sudu i Komisiji, članak 30. UEZ-a i dalje se primjenjuje u području proizvodnje i trgovanja gotovim lijekovima dok se u potpunosti ne postigne usklađivanje nacionalnih propisa u tim područjima (vidjeti navedene presude Schumacher, t. 15., Delattre, t. 48., Eurim-Pharm, t. 26., Komisija/Njemačka, t. 10. i Ortscheit, t. 14.).
In that regard, it should be noted that the sale of medicinal products to end consumers has not been subject to full Community harmonisation.
S tim u vezi treba primijetiti da prodaja lijekova krajnjim korisnicima nije bila predmet potpunog usklađivanja na razini Zajednice.
103 It is settled case-law that the health and life of humans rank foremost among the assets or interests protected by Article 30 EC and it is for the Member States, within the limits imposed by the Treaty, to decide what degree of protection they wish to assure (see Schumacher , paragraph 17; Eurim-Pharm , paragraph 26; and Ortscheit , paragraph 16).
103 U skladu s ustaljenom sudskom praksom, zdravlje i životi ljudi na prvom su mjestu vrijednosti i interesa zaštićenih člankom 30. UEZ-a i na državama članicama je da u okviru granica koje nameće Ugovor odluče o razini zaštite koju žele osigurati (vidjeti navedene presude Schumacher, t. 17., Eurim-Pharm, t. 26. i Ortscheit, t. 16.).
104 However, national rules or practices likely to have a restrictive effect, or having such an effect, on the importation of pharmaceutical products are compatible with the Treaty only to the extent that they are necessary for the effective protection of health and life of humans.
104 Međutim, nacionalni propisi ili prakse koji mogu imati ograničavajući učinak ili koje imaju takav učinak na uvoz farmaceutskih proizvoda u skladu su s Ugovorom samo u onoj mjeri u kojoj su potrebni za učinkovitu zaštitu zdravlja i života ljudi.
A national rule or practice cannot benefit from the derogation provided for in Article 30 EC if the health and life of humans may be protected just as effectively by measures which are less restrictive of intra-Community trade ( Schumacher , paragraphs 17 and 18; Delattre , paragraph 53; Eurim-Pharm , paragraph 27; Commission v Germany , paragraphs 10 and 11; and Ortscheit , paragraph 17).
Nacionalno pravo ili praksa ne može se koristiti odstupanjem predviđenim u članku 30. UEZ-a, ako se zdravlje i životi ljudi mogu zaštititi jednako učinkovito mjerama koje manje ograničavaju trgovinu unutar Zajednice (vidjeti navedene presude Schumacher, t. 17. i 18., Delattre, t. 53., Eurim-Pharm, t. 27., Komisija/Njemačka, t. 10. i 11. i Ortscheit, t. 17.).
105 In the case before the national court, no doubt is cast on the fact that the virtual pharmacy is subject to supervision by the Netherlands authorities, with the result that the arguments put forward by the Apothekerverband to assert generally that the supervision to which such a pharmacy is subject is inadequate, in comparison with that to which a traditional pharmacy is subject, cannot be accepted.
105 U predmetu pred nacionalnim sudom nije sporna činjenica da „virtualnu ljekarnu" nadziru nizozemska tijela, te stoga argumenti koje iznosi Apothekerverband za načelnu tvrdnju da je nadzor nad takvom ljekarnom nedostatan u usporedbi s nadzorom nad tradicionalnom ljekarnom, ne mogu biti prihvaćeni.
106 The only arguments which are capable of providing adequate reasons for prohibiting the mail-order trade in medicinal products are those relating to the need to provide individual advice to the customer and to ensure his protection when he is supplied with medicines and to the need to check that prescriptions are genuine and to guarantee that medicinal products are widely available and sufficient to meet requirements.
106 Jedini argumenti koji mogu opravdati zabranu trgovine lijekovima poštanskom narudžbom su oni koji se odnose na potrebu pružanja osobnog savjetovanja kupcu i osiguravanje njegove zaštite pri izdavanju lijekova i na potrebu provjere istinitosti recepta te koji osiguravaju da je opskrba lijekovima dostupna široj javnosti i prilagođena njezinim potrebama.