natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this context, in the past, the Commission has reported that, in order to exclude State aid, the amount of compensation for the discharge of PSOs should correspond to the market price, where the relevant market is an effectively contestable market with a sufficient number of potential bidders (see European Commission, Non-Paper on services of general economic interest and state aid, 12.11.2002, paragraph 87).
To je, prema navodima podnositelja pritužbi, dovelo do toga da je do većine otkazivanja tijekom razdoblja 2012.–2013. u odabranim lukama došlo pri brzinama vjetra ispod 15 m/s.
For background information on the Hurtigruten Agreement, see Decision No 205/11/COL on the Supplementary Agreement on the Hurtigruten service, section 2 (OJ L 175, 5.7.2012, p. 19, and EEA Supplement No 37, 5.7.2012, p. 1).
Presuda u predmetu Altmark Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv društva Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH (Altmark), C-280/00, EU:C:2003:415, točka 75.
Until 2006, the service was operated by two maritime companies, Ofotens or Vesteraalens Dampskipsselskap ASA and Troms Fylkes Dampskipsselskap.
3577/92 od 7. prosinca 1992. o primjeni načela slobode pružanja usluga u pomorskom prometu unutar država članica (pomorska kabotaža) (SL L 364, 12.12.1992., str. 7.), uključena u Sporazum o EGP-u Odlukom Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 70/97 (SL L 30, 5.2.1998., str. 42. i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 5, 5.2.1998., str. 175.).
The two companies merged in March 2006 to form Hurtigruten, which now operates the service.
Odluka o pokretanju postupka, točka 43.
In fact, according to the information submitted, the company Boreal/Veolia Transport had put forward questions during the Q&A process of the procurement procedure and was considering participating.
SL L 220, 17.8.2013., str. 20., točka 147.
Judgment in CoNISMa, C-305/08, EU:C:2009:807, paragraph 37; Judgment in Assitur, C-538/07, EU:C:2009:317, paragraph 26.
Presuda u predmetu T-674/11, ECLI:EU:T:2015:684, točka 103.
Decision 2012/21/EU incorporated at point 1h of Annex XV of the EEA Agreement.
Vidjeti presudu u spojenim predmetima E-10/11 i E-11/11 Hurtigruten [2012.]
Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, OJ L 161, 13.6.2013, p. 12 (Annex II) and EEA Supplement No 34, 13.6.2013, p. 1.
EFTA Ct.
The capacity cost distribution formula has been calculated by determining the ratio of the number of passenger kilometers required through the government procurement agreement, and Hurtigruten's actual passenger kilometer capacity.
Podnositelji pritužbi navode da su, prema podacima Udruženja norveških luka, troškovi na obalnoj liniji u razdoblju 2009.–2014. povećani za oko 17 %.
The passenger cost distribution formula has been calculated by determining the ratio between the number of passenger kilometers expected for distance travellers and the number of passenger kilometers for other travelers.
Do tog je povećanja došlo djelomično zbog općeg povećanja cijena, djelomično zbog povećanja prosječne bruto tonaže Hurtigrutenove flote te djelomično zbog viših troškova održavanja i razvoja infrastrukture do kojih je došlo zbog strožih propisa i standarda u pogledu infrastrukturnih projekata.
The Norwegian authorities have confirmed that these parameters do not include the expected refunds derived from the Seafarers Tax Refund Scheme (see EFTA Surveillance Authority Decision No 085/16/COL raising no objections to the tax refund scheme for employing seafarers 2016–2026, available at: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/esa-docs/physical/085-16-COL.pdf).
Primjena pravila o državnim potporama na naknade dodijeljene za pružanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa (SL L 161, 13.6.2013., str. 12.
Section 6 reads: ‘Both parties may request negotiations over production changes during the contract period.
(Prilog I.) i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 34, 13.6.2013., str. 1.), stavak 60.
The changes must not be considered significant and may involve increases or reductions in production, quality or capacity changes, or addition or elimination of single ports of call.
Dopis BDO-a, „Procjene cijena, zasebno računovodstvo i izvješćivanje”, Oslo, 22. veljače 2010.
Changes may apply to the rest of the contract period or for shorter periods. The remuneration shall be adjusted according to costs and revenues flowing from the changes. Distribution of costs and revenues shall be based on accounting separation’.
Dopis BDO-a, „Linija Bergen–Kirkenes – nove alternative za procjene cijena”, Oslo, 9. lipnja 2010.
Section 7 reads: 1.
U situaciji u kojoj putnik u okviru PSO-a nije u mogućnosti dobiti kabinu s ležajem, putnik može na temelju putnog jamstva zatražiti besplatno putovanje bez kabine s ležajem na planiranom putovanju ili besplatno putovanje u kabini s ležajem na sljedećem planiranom putovanju.
‘In the event of amendments to acts, regulations or statutory orders which the parties could not have reasonably foreseen on signing the contract and which entail material extra costs or savings for the contract for the public procurement of the service, each of the parties may demand negotiations concerning extraordinary adjustment of the remuneration from the contracting authority, a change to production or other measures […].
Nitko se 2014. nije pozivao na putno jamstvo, no 2015. ono je upotrijebljeno 15 puta.
Accounting separation shall form the basis of any renegotiation of the contract.
Oni se, među ostalim, odnose na promjene rezervacija putnika, pronalaženje alternativnog prijevoza za putnike i teret, troškove za pokrivanje vraćenog novca, zrakoplovne karte, hotele, taksije i najam autobusa.
It is considered to be of material significance for the party when it constitutes more than 5 % of the annual agreed remuneration for the year in question […].’
Primjena pravila o državnim potporama na naknade dodijeljene za pružanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa (SL L 161, 13.6.2013., str. 12.
The negotiations also led to certain changes incorporated to the draft tender contract, see HA, section 4.1 third paragraph (route production requirements), section 7 (renegotiations), section 8 (force majeure) and section 9.2 (non-performance in production).
(Prilog I.) i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 34, 13.6.2013., str. 1.), stavak 67.
Judgment in E-10/11 and E-11/11 Hurtigruten [2012] EFTA Ct.
U nastavku odjeljka 2.14. navodi se: „Odabir će se provesti na temelju ocjene razine cijena različitih alternativa u usporedbi s razlikama u učestalosti koje različite alternative predstavljaju.
Rep. 758, paragraph 127.
Nakon što se odabere alternativa javni naručitelj odabrat će ponudu u kojoj se nudi najniža cijena za cijelo ugovorno razdoblje (po cijenama iz 2011.).”
See in this context: Judgment in Coordination bruxelloise d'institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) v European Commission, T-137/10, EU:T:2012:584, paragraph 191.
Odluka Komisije 2012/21/EU od 20. prosinca 2011. o primjeni članka 106. stavka 2.
OJ L 161, 13.6.2013, p. 12 (Annex II) and EEA Supplement No 34, 13.6.2013, p. 1, paragraph 50.
Sporazumu o EGP-u.
See also Communication from the Commission on the interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 applying the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage), COM(2014) 232 final, 22.4.2014, section 5.5.2.
SL L 161, 13.6.2013., str. 12.
The results achieved through the negotiations have been examined and substantiated by the latest financial evaluation of BDO (see section 5.4 below on the second BDO report 2016).
(Prilog I.) i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 34, 13.6.2013., str. 1.), stavak 68.
In order to reach its conclusion, the report assesses all sailings on all ships between all ports-of-call in the years prior to the tender, i.e. the years 2008-2010, on the basis of detailed statistics received from Hurtigruten, concerning the number of passengers travelled with each ship on the different dates and legs in 2015, taking also into account the results of a study undertaken by TØI in 2002 for the same purpose in the context of the agreement covering the period 2005-2012.
Vidjeti Odluku Tijela br. 417/01/COL od 19. prosinca 2001. o naknadi za usluge pomorskog prijevoza u okviru „Sporazuma o Hurtigrutenu”, koja je dostupna na http://www.eftasurv.int.
No 081/17/COL
br. 081/17/COL
the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Article 61 and Protocol 26,
Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru („Sporazum o EGP-u”), a posebno njegov članak 61. i Protokol 26.,
Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (‘Protocol 3’), in particular to Article 1 of Part I and Articles 7(2) and 13 of Part II, and
Protokol 3.
having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those provisions [1], and having regard to their comments,
Sporazuma o nadzoru i sudu („Protokol 3.”), a posebno članak 1. dijela I. te članak 7. stavak 2. i članak 13. dijela II.,
Whereas:
nakon što je pozvalo zainteresirane strane da dostave svoje primjedbe u skladu s tim odredbama [1] i uzimajući u obzir njihove primjedbe,
I. FACTS
budući da:
PROCEDURE
I. ČINJENICE
By email dated 2 April 2014, Gámaþjónustan hf.
POSTUPAK
(‘the complainant’) lodged a complaint with the Authority concerning alleged unlawful state aid granted by the City of Reykjavík (‘the City’) through the rent of property and land in the Gufunes area in Reykjavík, Iceland, to Íslenska Gámafélagið (‘ÍG’), allegedly below market price [2].
Društvo Gámaþjónustan hf.
Following a preliminary examination the Authority, on 30 June 2015, adopted Decision No 261/15/COL to initiate a formal investigation into the alleged aid.
(„podnositelj pritužbe”) podnijelo je e-poštom 2. travnja 2014. pritužbu Tijelu o navodnoj nezakonitoj državnoj potpori koju je dodijelio Grad Reykjavík („Grad”) na temelju najma nekretnine i zemlje na području Gufunes u Reykjaviku na Islandu društvu Íslenska Gámafélagið („ÍG”) po cijeni navodno nižoj od tržišne [2].
By letter dated 1 October 2015 [3], the Icelandic authorities responded to the Authority's decision.
Nakon preliminarnog ispitivanja Tijelo je 30. lipnja 2015. donijelo Odluku br. 261/15/COL o pokretanju službenog istražnog postupka o navodnoj državnoj potpori.
On 24 September 2015, the Authority's Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure was published in the Official Journal of the European Union and in the EEA Supplement to it, giving interested parties one month to comment on the Authority's preliminary views [4].
Dopisom od 1. listopada 2015.
By letter dated 26 November 2015 [7], the Authority forwarded the comments and the market information to the Icelandic authorities who were given the opportunity to respond.
[9], 27. svibnja 2016.
By letter dated 5 January 2016, [8] the Icelandic authorities responded.
i 15. prosinca 2016.
The matter was also discussed between representatives of the Icelandic authorities and the Authority at a meeting in Reykjavík on 12 February 2016.
OPIS MJERE
Finally, the Authority received additional information concerning developments in the Gufunes area, from the complainant by emails dated 21 May 2016 [9], 27 May 2016 [10] and 15 December 2016 [11].
PODRUČJE GUFUNES (6) Područje Gufunes nalazi se u okrugu Grafarvogur u Reykjaviku, na Islandu.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Na tom je području do 2001. poslovala tvornica gnojiva Áburðarverksmiðjan.
THE GUFUNES AREA
Fond za plansku izgradnju Reykjavika (Skipulagssjóður Reykjavíkur, „SR”) kupio je 2002. tvornicu i okolno područje od dioničara tvornice Áburðarverksmiðjan („kupoprodajni ugovor”).
The Gufunes area is situated in the Grafarvogur district of Reykjavík, Iceland.
Prema navodima islandskih nadležnih tijela, prvotni je plan bio ukloniti sve zgrade i opremu s tog područja.
Until the year 2001, a fertiliser factory, Áburðarverksmiðjan, was operating in the area.
Fond SR raspušten je 2007. te je osnovan novi fond, Eignasjóður, koji je preuzeo imovinu i zadaće fonda SR.
In 2002, the planning fund of Reykjavík (Skipulagssjóður Reykjavíkur, ‘SR’) bought the factory and the surrounding area from the shareholders of Áburðarverksmiðjan (‘the purchase agreement’).
U skladu s gradskim prostornim planom Reykjavika za razdoblje 2001. – 2024., područje Gufunes ima stambenu namjenu i nije namijenjeno industrijskim aktivnostima [12].
According to the Icelandic authorities, the plan at the time was to remove all the buildings and installations from the area.
Osim toga, na tom se području planira izgradnja autoceste Sundabraut koja će povezivati područja Laugarnes i Gufunes.
In 2007, SR was dissolved and a new fund, Eignasjóður, was founded to take over SR's assets and tasks.
Nadalje, u skladu s gradskim planom Reykjavika za razdoblje 2010. – 2030., industrijsko područje Gufunesa vraća se u prijašnje stanje te je na tom mjestu u budućnosti predviđeno mješovito urbano područje namijenjeno stambenim jedinicama i čistim poslovnim aktivnostima [13].
According to the Reykjavík Municipal Zoning Plan 2001-2024, the Gufunes area is intended for residential purposes and not for industrial activities [12].
Ni u jednom se planu u budućnosti ne predviđa smještanje industrijskih aktivnosti na tom području.
Additionally, the area is intended for the construction of the Sundabraut highway, connecting Laugarnes and Gufunes.
UGOVORI SKLOPLJENI IZMEĐU GRADA REYKJAVIKA I DRUŠTVA ÍSLENSKA GÁMAFÉLAGIÐ O NAJMU ZEMLJE I NEKRETNINA NA PODRUČJU GUFUNES
Moreover, according to the Reykjavík Municipal plan for 2010-2030, the industrial area of Gufunes is regressing and a mixed urban area of residential units and clean commercial activities is anticipated in the future [13].
Kada je SR u veljači 2002. kupio zemlju i nekretnine na području Gufunes, ondje se nalazilo više najmoprimaca (uglavnom poduzetnici i investitori).
Neither plan foresees that industrial activities will continue to be located in the area in the future.
Tada je društvo ÍG imalo ugovor o najmu s tvornicom Áburðarverksmiðjan koji je sklopljen 29. listopada 1999. („ugovor iz 1999.”).
AGREEMENTS CONCLUDED BETWEEN THE CITY OF REYKJAVÍK AND ÍSLENSKA GÁMAFÉLAGIÐ FOR THE RENT OF LAND AND PROPERTIES IN THE GUFUNES AREA
U ugovoru iz 1999. određena je mjesečna najamnina u iznosu od 159240 ISK na temelju cijene po kvadratnom metru [14].
In February 2002, when SR purchased the land and the properties in the Gufunes area, the area was occupied by several tenants (mainly contractors and developers).
ÍG se tom zemljom koristio za potrebe svojeg poslovanja u području gospodarenja otpadom.
At the time, ÍG had a lease agreement with Áburðarverksmiðjan, which had been concluded 29 October 1999 (‘the 1999 Agreement’).
U skladu s kupoprodajnim ugovorom, SR je preuzeo sve obveze i prava od tvornice Áburðarverksmiðjan u pogledu postojećih ugovora o najmu, uključujući i ugovor iz 1999. s društvom ÍG.
The 1999 Agreement set out a monthly rental fee of ISK 159240, based on a price per square meter [14].
Prema navodima Grada, na području Gufunes stalno je bilo mnogo aktivnosti te se njime teško upravljalo.
ÍG used the land for its waste management business.
Osim toga, zgrade i oprema bile su u lošem stanju, neki najmoprimci nisu plaćali najam te je došlo do nakupljanja otpada, primjerice, olupina automobila.
According to the purchase agreement, SR took over all obligations and rights from Áburðarverksmiðjan regarding the existing lease agreements, including the 1999 Agreement with ÍG.
Gradu je stoga bilo jasno da će, u skladu sa svojim obvezama zemljovlasnika, morati zaposliti osoblje za danonoćni nadzor tog područja.
According to the City, the Gufunes area was continuingly busy and difficult to manage.
S obzirom na to stanje, nije se smatralo realnim ponuditi to područje u svrhu najma.
Moreover, the buildings and installations were in bad shape, some tenants were not paying rent and there had been an accumulation of scrap, such as car wreckages.
Stoga je odlučeno da se postojeći ugovori o najmu ne produlje te da se umjesto toga sklopi ugovor samo s jednom stranom.
It was therefore clear to the City that in order to serve its role as a landowner, it would have to hire staff to control the area during day and night.
Slijedom toga, SR je odlučio pregovarati o uvjetima najma, čišćenja i nadzora područja s društvom ÍG koje je tada bilo najveći pojedinačni najmoprimac te je na vrijeme plaćalo najamninu [15].
The following is an overview of the agreements concluded between SR and ÍG: (i) 22 February 2005.
U općem ugovoru o najmu iz 2005. nije bila utvrđena cijena koja se plaćala po kvadratnom metru ili vrijednost obveza društva ÍG.
The total monthly rental fee was set at ISK 960000 for a total of 4676 square meters (including a 500 square meter lot) [16].
ÍG se obvezao i povući tužbu protiv Grada u vezi s troškovima održavanja [21].
14 October 2005.
Prema navodima Grada, iako je u najmu društva ÍG zemlja površine od 130000 m2, samo 110000 m2 te zemlje upotrebljivo je za potrebe društva.
SR and ÍG concluded an agreement (‘the 2005 General Lease Agreement’), replacing the previous agreement from 22 February 2005, regarding lease, clean-up and supervision of land in the area of Gufunes.
Ukupna registrirana površina zgrada iznosi 24722 m2.
The Icelandic authorities have explained that the agreement covered an area of about 130000 square meters.
Predmetna zemlja, zgrade i oprema nalaze se na utvrđenom lučkom području koje pripada društvu Faxaflóahafnir sf., a iznajmljeno je Gradu.
The validity of the 2005 General Lease Agreement was extended, through an amendment, until 31 December 2011.
Prema dostavljenim informacijama, prosječan mjesečni trošak koji snosi ÍG iznosi 10815624 ISK, uključujući trošak najamnine.
ÍG was also obliged to demolish specified properties and remove equipment on the ground.
Mjesečni trošak najma stoga iznosi približno 25 % ukupnih mjesečnih troškova društva ÍG.
ÍG was allowed to keep devices and installations removed from the ground at its own expense [19]. (iv) 21 December 2007.
Kad je sklopljen ugovor o najmu od 22. veljače 2005., SR nije nametnuo nikakve obveze društvu ÍG.
The validity of the 2005 General Lease Agreement was extended, through an amendment, until 31 December 2015.
Obveze društva ÍG uvedene su općim ugovorom o najmu iz 2005. od 14. listopada 2005. te su određene s obzirom na predložena rušenja i procijenjene troškove čišćenja, uklanjanja i nadzora područja.
The owner could at any time take over part or all of the leased land if necessary due to changes in land use planning.
Obveze u pogledu čišćenja i uklanjanja smatrale su se opsežnima s obzirom na stanje područja.
ÍG also committed to reconnect pipes for electricity, water and heating that had become unusable.
U nastavku se nalazi procjena troškova društva ÍG u skladu s njegovim obvezama određenima u općem ugovoru o najmu iz 2005.
Moreover, ÍG withdrew a tort claim against the City [20]. (v) 15 June 2009.
: Izvor: Grad Reykjavík
The validity of the 2005 General Lease Agreement was extended, through an amendment, until 31 December 2018.
Godina
ÍG undertook to handle the maintenance of the area and to raise a levee, and an existing lease of a boat storage owned by Reykjavík Yacht club was extended.
Trošak najamnine
According to the City, although the size of land rented by ÍG is 130000 m2, only 110000 m2 is usable for their purposes.
Administrativni troškovi
The total registered size of the buildings is 24722 m2.
Održavanje
According to the Icelandic Property Registry, the value of the land previously owned by Áburðarverksmiðjan is ISK 211000000.
Pravni troškovi
The value of the land which ÍG rents has not been assessed, but the value of the entire land previously owned by Áburðarverksmiðjan it is estimated by the City at around ISK 137000000.
Troškovi energije drugih
The total registered value of buildings rented by ÍG is ISK 850323512 [22].
Nedovršeno rušenje
According to Article 4(2) of the Icelandic Act on Municipal Income No 4/1995, the property owner shall pay the property tax except where leased farms, leased lots or other contractual utilisation of land are involved, in which case the tax shall be paid by the resident or the user.
Dovršeno rušenje
The land, buildings and installations in question are on a defined harbour area which belongs to Faxaflóahafnir sf. and is leased to the City.
Popravci
The City therefore pays the property tax on the leased land and the properties rented out to ÍG.
Ulazi/ograde
Although none of the agreements include information concerning the value of the services provided by ÍG, the City has provided a table setting out an estimation of ÍG's costs stipulated in the 2005 General Lease Agreement and later amendments (hereafter collectively referred to as ‘the rental agreements’) from the time when the 2005 General Lease Agreement was concluded and until the end of the lease period in 2018 [23].
Čišćenje
The estimation was carried out by the City's expert analysts.
Bojanje
Furthermore, the information provided contains the cost of both finished and unfinished demolition projects.
Obnove
According to the information provided, the average monthly cost borne by ÍG is ISK 10815624, including the rental fee.
Električni vodovi itd.
The rental fee per month is therefore approximately 25 % of ÍG's total cost per month.
Otpadne vode
When the lease agreement dated 22 February 2005 was concluded, SR did not impose any obligations on ÍG.
Lukobran
ÍG's obligations were introduced with the 2005 General Lease Agreement of 14 October 2005 and determined in light of the proposed demolitions and estimated costs of cleaning, disposal and supervision of the area.
Odlaganje
The cleaning and disposal obligations were considered extensive in light of the area's condition.
Asfalt
Below is an evaluation of ÍG's costs in accordance with their obligations stipulated in the 2005 General Lease Agreement [24]:
Tlo
Source: City of Reykjavík.
Protupožarni alarm
Year
Ukupne obveze
Rental fee
Ukupno u ISK
Employee
Mjesečni prosjek
Administration
Prosjek
Maintenance
NAJNOVIJI RAZVOJ DOGAĐAJA NA PODRUČJU GUFUNES
Legal
Početkom 2014.
Energy costs of others
Gradsko vijeće Reykjavika odlučilo je uspostaviti upravljački odbor koji će predstaviti viziju za područje Gufunes [25].
Demolition unf.
Odbor je predložio otvoreni idejni natječaj o budućem planskom uređenju područja Gufunes.
Demolition fin.
Gradsko vijeće Reykjavika odlučilo je, na sjednici u lipnju 2015., objaviti oglas o natječaju kojim se potiče zainteresirane strane da dostave ideje o budućoj organizaciji područja Gufunes [26].
Repairs
Nakon objave oglasa Grad je primio četiri ideje.
Gates/Fences
Jedan od tih podnesaka poslalo je društvo RVK Studios, koje se bavi proizvodnjom filmova, a koje je izrazilo svoju zainteresiranost da kupi dio zgrada na području Gufunes radi osnivanja filmske industrije na tom području.
Cleaning
Zgrade za čiju je kupnju društvo RVK Studios izrazilo zainteresiranost neke su od nekretnina nekadašnje tvornice Áburðarverksmiðjan koje su iznajmljene društvu ÍG na temelju ugovora o najmu.
Painting
Grad i društvo RVK Studios dali su nakon toga dvama neovisnim agentima za nekretnine da procjene vrijednost predmetnog dijela područja Gufunes [27].
Restorations
Na sjednici Gradskog vijeća od 18. studenoga 2015.
Wiring etc.
Vijeće je zadužilo gradski Ured za upravljanje nekretninama i gospodarski razvoj da počne pregovarati s društvom RVK Studios na temelju tih procjena vrijednosti [28].
Sewage
Osim toga, Vijeće je zadužilo Ured da počne pregovarati s društvom ÍG o napuštanju područja i mogućem premještanju u skladu s odredbama općeg ugovora o najmu iz 2005.
Breakwater
Gradsko vijeće Reykjavika 19. svibnja 2016. pristalo je sklopiti ugovor s društvom RVK Studios o kupoprodaji određenih nekretnina na području Gufunes [29].
Disposal
Grad je nakon toga priopćio da će društvo ÍG premjestiti svoje poslovne aktivnosti u novo gradsko industrijsko područje u Esjumelaru [30].
Asphalt
Gradonačelnik Reykjavika i glavni izvršni direktor društva ÍG potpisali su 20. svibnja 2016. ugovore o raskidu ugovorā o najmu i o premještanju društva ÍG te su otvorili radove na novim poslovnim prostorima društva ÍG u Esjumelaru.
Soil
Grad je 27. svibnja 2016. potpisao ugovor s društvom RVK Studios o kupoprodaji nekih od nekretnina nekadašnje tvornice Áburðarverksmiðjan [31].
Fire alarm
Veličina nekretnina prodanih društvu RVK Studios iznosi 8400 m2, a kupoprodajna cijena iznosila je 301650000 ISK.