natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In accordance with Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in conjunction with Article 6 thereof and in the light of current scientific and technical knowledge, it is, however, necessary to include certain conditions and restrictions.
Stalnom odboru za bilje, životinje, hranu i hranu za životinje dostavila nacrt izvješća o produljenju odobrenja za karfentrazon-etil.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Za jednu ili više reprezentativnih uporaba najmanje jednog sredstva za zaštitu bilja koje sadržava karfentrazon-etil utvrđeno je da su mjerila za odobravanje predviđena člankom 4.
Taking into account that the current approval of carfentrazone-ethyl expires on 31 July 2018, this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 ispunjena.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,
Stoga je primjereno produljiti odobrenje za karfentrazon-etil.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Procjena rizika za produljenje odobrenja aktivne tvari karfentrazon-etil temelji se na ograničenom broju reprezentativnih uporaba, no time se ne ograničavaju uporabe za koje se mogu odobriti sredstva za zaštitu bilja koja sadržavaju karfentrazon-etil.
Article 1
Stoga je primjereno ukinuti ograničenje za uporabu te tvari isključivo kao herbicida.
The approval of the active substance carfentrazone-ethyl is renewed as set out in Annex I.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 u vezi s njezinim člankom 6. te s obzirom na postojeća znanstvena i tehnička saznanja, potrebno je, međutim, utvrditi određene uvjete i ograničenja.
The Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 is amended in accordance with Annex II to this Regulation.
Budući da postojeće odobrenje karfentrazon-etila istječe 31. srpnja 2018., ova bi Uredba trebala stupiti na snagu što prije.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Odobrenje aktivne tvari karfentrazon-etil produljuje se kako je utvrđeno u Prilogu I.
Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1).
Članak 3.
Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance carfentrazone-ethyl.
Za Komisiju
EFSA Journal 2016;14(8):4569.
Predsjednik
Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu
Uredba (EZ) br. 1107/2009 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. listopada 2009. o stavljanju na tržište sredstava za zaštitu bilja i stavljanju izvan snage direktiva Vijeća 79/117/EEZ i 91/414/EEZ (SL L 309, 24.11.2009., str. 1.).
ANNEX I
Direktiva Komisije 2003/68/EZ od 11. srpnja 2003. o izmjeni Direktive Vijeća 91/414/EEZ radi uvrštavanja trifloksistrobina, karfentrazon-etila, mezotriona, fenamidona i izoksaflutola kao aktivnih tvari (SL L 177, 16.7.2003., str. 12.).
Date of approval
EFSA Journal 2016.;14(8):4569.
Carfentrazone-ethyl
Uobičajeni naziv, identifikacijski brojevi
CAS No 128639-02-1
Kemijski naziv prema IUPAC-u
CIPAC No 587.202
Čistoća
Ethyl (RS)-2-chloro-3-[2-chloro-4-fluoro-5-[4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H- 1,2,4-triazol-1-yl]phenyl]propionate
Datum odobrenja
For the implementation of the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on carfentrazone-ethyl, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, shall be taken into account.
Karfentrazon-etil
In their overall assessment Member States shall pay particular attention to:
CAS br.
the protection of groundwater when the substance is applied in regions with vulnerable soil and/or climate conditions,
128639-02-1
the protection of soil non-target organisms,
CIPAC br.
the protection of aquatic organisms,
587.202
the protection of non-target terrestrial higher plants.
Etil (RS)-2-kloro-3-[2-kloro-4-fluoro-5-[4-(difluorometil)-4,5-dihidro-3-metil-5-okso-1H- 1,2,4-triazol-1-il]fenil]propionat
Conditions of use shall include risk mitigation measures, where appropriate.
1. kolovoza 2018.
The applicant shall submit to the Commission, the Member States and the Authority confirmatory information as regards:
31. srpnja 2033.
the relevance of metabolites that may occur in groundwater, taking into account any relevant classification for carfentrazone-ethyl in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in particular as carcinogen category 2;
Za provedbu jedinstvenih načela iz članka 29. stavka 6.
the effect of water treatment processes on the nature of residues present in drinking water.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1107/2009 moraju se uzeti u obzir zaključci izvješća o pregledu za karfentrazon-etil, a posebno njegovi dodaci I. i II.
The applicant shall submit the information mentioned in point (1) within one year after the publication on the website of the European Chemicals Agency of the opinion adopted by the Committee for Risk Assessment of the European Chemicals Agency in accordance with Article 37(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 with respect to carfentrazone-ethyl.
U svojoj ukupnoj ocjeni države članice moraju obratiti posebnu pozornost na sljedeće:
The applicant shall submit the information requested under point (2) within two years of a guidance document on evaluation of the effect of water treatment processes on the nature of residues present in surface and groundwater being made public by the Commission.
zaštitu podzemnih voda ako se aktivna tvar primjenjuje u područjima s osjetljivim tlom i/ili nepovoljnim klimatskim uvjetima;
Further details on identity and specification of active substance are provided in the review report.
zaštitu organizama u tlu koji ne pripadaju ciljanoj skupini;
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (OJ L 353, 31.12.2008, p. 1).
zaštitu vodenih organizama;
ANNEX II
zaštitu kopnenog višeg bilja koje ne pripada ciljnoj skupini.
in Part A, the entry 60 on carfentrazone-ethyl is deleted;
Podnositelj zahtjeva mora Komisiji, državama članicama i Agenciji dostaviti potvrdne informacije o sljedećem:
in Part B, the following entry is added:
relevantnosti metabolita koji mogu biti prisutni u podzemnim vodama, uzimajući u obzir relevantno razvrstavanje karfentrazon-etila u skladu s Uredbom (EZ) br.
Number
1272/2008 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća, osobito kao karcinogene tvari kategorije 2.;
For the implementation of the uniform principles, as referred to in Article 29(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the conclusions of the review report on carfentrazone-ethyl, and in particular Appendices I and II thereof, shall be taken into account.
učinku postupaka pročišćavanja vode na vrstu ostataka prisutnih u vodi za piće.
the protection of groundwater when the substance is applied in regions with vulnerable soil and/or climate conditions;
Podnositelj zahtjeva mora dostaviti informacije iz točke 1. u roku od godinu dana od objave mišljenja Odbora za procjenu rizika Europske agencije za kemikalije na internetskim stranicama Europske agencije za kemikalije u pogledu karfentrazon-etila, u skladu s člankom 37. stavkom 4.
the protection of soil non-target organisms;
Uredbe (EZ) br.
the protection of aquatic organisms;
1272/2008.
The applicant shall submit the information requested under point (2) within two years of a guidance document on evaluation of the effect of water treatment processes on the nature of residues present in surface and groundwater being made public by the Commission.’
Podnositelj zahtjeva mora dostaviti informacije iz točke 2. u roku od dvije godine nakon što Komisija objavi smjernice za ocjenu učinka postupaka pročišćavanja vode na vrstu ostataka prisutnih u površinskim odnosno podzemnim vodama.
Jean-Claude Juncker
Uredba (EZ) br.
amending and correcting Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards detailed rules concerning certain provisions of the Union Customs Code
o izmjeni i ispravku Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 o dopuni Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o detaljnim pravilima koja se odnose na pojedine odredbe Carinskog zakonika Unije
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code, and in particular Articles 2, 7, 24, 65, 88, 99, 142, 151, 156, 160, 212, 216, 231 and 253 thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EU) br. 952/2013 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 9. listopada 2013. o Carinskom zakoniku Unije, a posebno njezine članke 2., 7., 24., 65., 88., 99., 142., 151., 156., 160., 212., 216., 231. i 253.,
The practical implementation of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (the Code) together with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 has shown that some amendments need to be made to that Delegated Regulation in order to better adjust it to the needs of economic operators and customs administrations.
Provedbom Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013 (Zakonik) zajedno s Delegiranom Uredbom Komisije (EU) 2015/2446 u praksi se pokazala nužnost određenih izmjena te Delegirane uredbe radi njezine bolje prilagodbe potrebama gospodarskih subjekata i carinskih uprava.
In Article 1(19) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, the definition of ‘exporter’ should be modified in relation to exports of goods that are not carried by a private individual in his personal baggage, in order to allow greater flexibility to business partners in the choice of the person which may act as exporter.
U članku 1. stavku 19.
The current definition is problematic insofar as it determines as ‘exporter’ only one person, who has to meet three cumulative requirements: being established in the customs territory of the Union, holding a contract with a consignee in a third country, and having the power to determine that the goods are to be brought outside the customs territory of the Union.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi izmijeniti definiciju pojma „izvoznik” u odnosu na izvoz robe koju fizička osoba ne nosi u osobnoj prtljazi, čime bi se poslovnim partnerima omogućila veća fleksibilnost u izboru osoba koje mogu djelovati kao izvoznik.
Therefore, the new definition of ‘exporter’ should be less restrictive and limit the conditions for being an exporter to the essential requirements for the functioning of the export procedure: the exporter must have the power to determine that the goods are to be taken out of the customs territory of the Union and, in line with Article 170(2) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, the exporter must be established in the customs territory of the Union.
Važeća je definicija problematična u mjeri u kojoj se kao „izvoznik” određuje samo jedna osoba koja mora ispuniti tri kumulativna zahtjeva: osoba mora imati poslovni nastan na carinskom području Unije i ugovor s primateljem u trećoj zemlji te ovlast za odlučivanje o slanju robe izvan carinskog područja Unije.
Only in cases where the business partners do not agree on the person who may act as exporter or the person is not established in the customs territory of the Union, the exporter is determined by the customs legislation.
Stoga bi nova definicija pojma „izvoznik” trebala biti manje restriktivna i ograničiti uvjete za status izvoznika na bitne zahtjeve za funkcioniranje postupka izvoza: izvoznik mora imati ovlast za odlučivanje o slanju robe izvan carinskog područja Unije i, u skladu s člankom 170. stavkom 2.
In Article 5(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, persons requesting proof of customs status of Union goods, irrespective of whether they are established in the customs territory of the Union or not, should be required to register for an EORI number so that they can access the UCC Proof of Union Status system as referred to in the Annex to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/578.
Uredbe (EU) br. 952/2013, izvoznik mora imati poslovni nastan na carinskom području Unije.
The customs authorities need a permanent derogation from the obligation to use electronic data-processing techniques in relation to applications and decisions that occur rarely and for which the obligation to deploy electronic data-processing techniques would require a disproportionate economic effort.
Izvoznik bi se utvrđivao u skladu s carinskim zakonodavstvom samo ako se poslovni partneri ne mogu složiti o tome tko je osoba koja može djelovati kao izvoznik ili ako osoba nema poslovni nastan na carinskom području Unije.
Given that the range of electronic data-processing techniques differs from Member State to Member State, the applications and decisions in relation to which this derogation should be granted also varies from Member State to Member State.
Člankom 5. stavkom 1.
All the Member States must use electronic data-processing techniques with respect to the applications and decisions for which common data requirements exist and for which common electronic systems have been deployed.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi obvezati osobe koje traže dokaz o carinskom statusu robe Unije, neovisno o tome imaju li poslovni nastan na carinskom području Unije ili ne, na registriranje za EORI broj kako bi im se omogućio pristup sustavu dokaza o statusu robe Unije u okviru Carinskog zakonika Unije iz Priloga Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2016/578.
Accordingly, a new Article 7a of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be laid down allowing the use of other means than electronic data-processing techniques exclusively for applications and decisions for which the relevant data requirements are not set out in Annex A to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Carinskim tijelima potrebno je trajno odstupanje od obveze upotrebe tehnika elektroničke obrade podataka kad je riječ o zahtjevima i odlukama do kojih rijetko dolazi i zbog kojih bi obveza uvođenja tehnika elektroničke obrade podataka rezultirala nerazmjernim gospodarskim opterećenjem.
In order to avoid that the decision-making procedure is unduly delayed by an applicant not providing the right information to the customs authorities despite having been given the opportunity to do so, Article 10(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should not extend the right to be heard to applicants who have been asked to provide relevant information and have failed to do so, resulting in the customs authorities not being able to accept their application.
Imajući u vidu da se raspon tehnika elektroničke obrade podataka razlikuje među državama članicama, zahtjevi i odluke u odnosu na koje bi trebalo odobriti to odstupanje također se razlikuju među državama članicama.
The definition of registered exporter in Article 37(21) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be clarified to also cover exporters established in a Member State and registered with the customs authorities of that Member State, for the purpose of exporting products originating in the Union to a country or territory with which the Union has a preferential trade arrangement, so as to allow those exporters to make out origin declarations for benefitting from the preferential trade arrangement concerned.
Sve države članice moraju upotrebljavati tehnike elektroničke obrade podataka za zahtjeve i odluke za koje postoje zajednički zahtjevi u pogledu podataka i za koje su uvedeni zajednički elektronički sustavi.
By contrast, the definition should not include the registration of Union exporters for the purpose of replacing statements on origin when goods are re-consigned to Turkey, because replacement of a proof of origin in the EU when goods are re-consigned to Turkey is not applicable.
U skladu s time, u Delegiranu uredbu (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi uvesti novi članak 7.a kojim će se omogućiti upotreba drugih sredstava osim tehnika elektroničke obrade podataka isključivo za zahtjeve i odluke za koje odgovarajući zahtjevi u pogledu podataka nisu utvrđeni u Prilogu A Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2015/2446.
Article 40 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 provides for the possibility to use means other than electronic data-processing techniques when submitting applications to become a registered exporter.
Kako bi se izbjegla neopravdana kašnjenja u postupku odlučivanja zbog toga što podnositelj zahtjeva carinskim tijelima nije dostavio točne informacije unatoč tome što je imao mogućnost to učiniti, člankom 10. točkom (a) Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 ne bi trebalo proširiti pravo na saslušanje podnositelja zahtjeva od kojih je zatraženo dostavljanje relevantnih informacija i koji to nisu učinili, zbog čega carinska tijela nisu u mogućnosti prihvatiti njihov zahtjev.
This permanent derogation should be extended to all communication and exchanges of information in relation to applications and decisions concerning the status of a registered exporter and in relation to any subsequent applications and acts relating to the management of those decisions, as the existing electronic data processing system for registered exporters, the Registered Exporter System (REX) referred to in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/578, does not currently include a harmonised interface for communications with economic operators.
Trebalo bi pojasniti definiciju registriranog izvoznika iz članka 37. stavka 21.
The derogation is temporary and will not be needed once the REX system will provide that harmonized interface.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 kako bi se definicijom obuhvatili i izvoznici s poslovnim nastanom u državi članici i registrirani pri carinskim tijelima te države članice za potrebe izvoza proizvoda podrijetlom iz Unije u zemlju ili područje s kojima Unija ima sporazum o povlaštenoj trgovini, kako bi se tim izvoznicima omogućilo sastavljanje izjava o podrijetlu radi ostvarivanja pogodnosti od predmetnog sporazuma o povlaštenoj trgovini.
In order to ensure compliance with the rules on origin of the goods, the customs authorities in Member States and the competent authorities in beneficiary countries applying bilateral or regional cumulation, as set out in Article 53 and Article 55(8) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, should carry out all the necessary verifications and controls of origin and not only control the issue or making out of proofs of origin.
Nasuprot tome, definicija ne bi trebala uključivati registraciju izvoznika iz Unije radi zamjene tvrdnji o podrijetlu ako se roba ponovno šalje u Tursku jer zamjenski dokazi o podrijetlu iz EU-a nisu primjenjivi pri ponovnom slanju robe u Tursku.
In order to make clearer the rule for determination of origin in the case of regional cumulation, the second and third subparagraphs of Article 55(4) and of Article 55(6) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be merged.
Člankom 40.
In order to ensure consistency with the terms used in Article 166(1)(b) and (c), Article 167(1)(s), Article 168 and Article 169 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, the wording in Article 76 of that Delegated Regulation concerning the derogation for the calculation of the amount of import duty on processed products resulting from inward processing should be amended.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 predviđena je mogućnost upotrebe sredstava koja nisu tehnike elektroničke obrade podataka pri podnošenju zahtjeva za status registriranog izvoznika.
For reasons of clarity, Article 82 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should refer to the Annexes in which the relevant common data requirements for the undertaking of the guarantor are set out.
To trajno odstupanje trebalo bi proširiti na svu komunikaciju i razmjenu informacija u pogledu zahtjeva i odluka o statusu registriranog izvoznika i u pogledu svih daljnjih zahtjeva i akata koji se odnose na upravljanje tim odlukama, s obzirom na to da postojeći sustav za elektroničku obradu podataka registriranih izvoznika, sustav registriranih izvoznika (REX) iz Priloga Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2016/578, trenutačno ne uključuje usklađeno sučelje za komunikaciju s gospodarskim subjektima.
In order to ensure consistency of the provisions concerning guarantees, the reference in Article 83 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 to Member States should be replaced by a reference to customs authorities.
Odstupanje je privremeno i neće biti potrebno nakon što se u sustavu REX uvede to usklađeno sučelje.
The time-limit for taking decisions on repayment or remission provided for in Article 97 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be extended where it is not possible for the competent customs authority to complete an assessment and take a decision on repayment or remission in the due period of time because the decision to be taken depends on the outcome of a case involving identical or comparable questions of facts and of law pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union in accordance with Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or of specific pending administrative procedures which may affect that decision.
Carinska tijela država članica i nadležna tijela zemalja korisnica koje primjenjuju dvostrane ili regionalne kumulacije, kako je utvrđeno u članku 53. i članku 55. stavku 8.
In order to ensure that the extension of the period to decide does not adversely affect the applicant, that extension should be possible only if the applicant does not oppose to it and should be clearly limited to those specific situations.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, trebala bi radi osiguravanja usklađenosti s pravilima o podrijetlu robe izvršiti sve potrebne provjere i nadzore podrijetla, a ne samo nadzor izdavanja ili sastavljanja dokaza o podrijetlu.
In order to ensure the smooth flow in the trade of Union goods between parts of the customs territory of the Union to which Council Directive 2006/112/EC or Council Directive 2008/118/EC apply and parts of that territory where those provisions do not apply (special fiscal territories), Articles 114 and 134 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should establish certain simplifications concerning the customs formalities and controls that are applicable to that trade when it takes place within the same Member State.
Kako bi se pojasnilo pravilo za određivanje podrijetla u slučaju regionalne kumulacije, članak 55. stavak 4. drugi i treći podstavak te članak 55. stavak 6. drugi i treći podstavak Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi objediniti.
Under Article 115 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 a place other than the competent customs office may be approved for the purposes of the presentation of goods under the condition that the goods are declared for a customs procedure or are re-exported within a very short period of time.
Kako bi se osigurala dosljednost pojmova iz članka 166. stavka 1. točaka (b) i (c), članka 167. stavka 1. točke (s), članka 168. i članka 169.
That period should be slightly extended so that more economic operators can comply with that condition.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, trebalo bi izmijeniti tekst članka 76. te Delegirane uredbe kojim je uređeno odstupanje u slučaju izračuna iznosa uvozne carine na prerađene proizvode koji proizlaze iz postupka unutarnje proizvodnje.
The same extension should apply to the condition regarding the approval of a place other than a temporary storage facility for temporary storage of goods.
Radi jasnoće, članak 82.
In order to protect the information on the place of catch of the fishery products when the printout of the fishing logbook is provided to the authorities of third countries so that those authorities can certify that sea-fishing products and goods transhipped and transported through their country or territory have not been manipulated, the economic operators should be allowed to remove that information from the fishing logbook printout for the purposes of that certification.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebao bi upućivati na priloge u kojima su utvrđeni relevantni zajednički zahtjevi u pogledu podataka za preuzete obveze jamca.