natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 12 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 sets out the total number of duly completed and submitted farm returns per Member State that are eligible for the payment of the standard fee.
U članku 12.
Article 19(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 provides for a reduction of the standard fee to 80 % where the total number of duly completed and delivered farm returns in respect of a FADN division or a Member State is less than 80 % of the number of returning holdings laid down for that FADN division or for the Member State concerned.
Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/220 utvrđen je ukupan broj propisno ispunjenih i dostavljenih izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva po državi članici koja imaju pravo na plaćanje standardne naknade.
In order to ensure a fair application of that provision, it should not be possible to compensate for non-delivered farm returns in a FADN division for which less than 80 % of the number of returning holdings laid down for that FADN division was submitted by the Member State.
Člankom 19. stavkom 1. točkom (a) Uredbe (EZ) br. 1217/2009 predviđa se smanjenje standardne naknade na 80 % ako je ukupan broj propisno ispunjenih i dostavljenih izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva u odnosu na područnu jedinicu FADN-a ili na državu članicu manji od 80 % broja izvještajnih gospodarstava propisanog za tu područnu jedinicu FADN-a ili za predmetnu državu članicu.
Article 14(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 sets a 2-month deadline for the validation of submitted farm returns in relation to their potential eligibility for the payment of the increased standard fee.
Kako bi se zajamčila pravedna primjena te odredbe, ne bi trebalo biti moguće nadoknaditi nedostavljena izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva u područnoj jedinici FADN-a za koju je država članica podnijela manje od 80 % od broja izvještajnih gospodarstava propisanog za tu područnu jedinicu FADN-a.
In order to provide more clarity as regards the duration of that period, it should be expressed in working days in the Member State concerned.
Člankom 14. stavkom 4.
In addition, the Commission should have the possibility to extend that period in exceptional and duly justified cases.
Provedbene Uredbe (EU) 2015/220 utvrđuje se rok od dva mjeseca za ovjeru dostavljenih izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva u pogledu njihove potencijalne prihvatljivosti za isplatu povećane standardne naknade.
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 should therefore be amended accordingly.
Kako bi se osigurala veća jasnoća u pogledu trajanja tog razdoblja, ono treba biti izraženo u radnim danima u predmetnoj državi članici.
Having regard to the nature of the amendments, it is appropriate that they apply as from the accounting year 2018.
Osim toga, Komisija bi trebala moći produljiti taj rok u iznimnim i opravdanim slučajevima.
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Farm Accountancy Data Network,
Provedbenu uredbu (EU) 2015/220 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Uzimajući u obzir prirodu izmjena, primjereno je da se primjenjuju od obračunske godine 2018.
Article 1
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora za sustav poljoprivrednih knjigovodstvenih podataka,
Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 is amended as follows:
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
in Article 12, the following paragraph is added:
Članak 1.
‘However, farm returns from a FADN division with a higher number of submitted farm returns than laid down for that FADN division in Annex II shall not be considered as eligible for the payment of the standard fee in a FADN division for which less than 80 % of the required number of returning holdings is submitted by the Member State.’;
Provedbena uredba (EU) 2015/220 mijenja se kako slijedi:
in Article 14, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
u članku 12. dodaje se sljedeći stavak:
To the increase of the standard fee under points (a) and (b) of paragraph 3 may be added EUR 2 for the accounting year 2018 and EUR 5 from the accounting year 2019 where the accountancy data has been verified by the Commission in accordance with point (b) of the first paragraph of Article 13 of this Regulation and is deemed duly completed in accordance with Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009, either at the moment of its submission to the Commission, or within 40 working days from the date on which the Commission informed the submitting Member State that the submitted accountancy data is not duly completed.
„Međutim, izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva iz područne jedinice FADN-a s brojem dostavljenih izvješća za poljoprivredna gospodarstva koji je veći od onog propisanog za tu područnu jedinicu FADN-a u Prilogu II. neće imati pravo na isplatu standardne naknade u područnoj jedinici FADN-a za koju je država članica dostavila manje od 80 % od propisanog broja izvještajnih gospodarstava.”;
In exceptional and duly justified cases, the Commission may decide to extend that period of 40 working days.
u članku 14. stavak 4. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
The end date of the period of 40 working days, or of any extension thereof, shall be confirmed in writing between the Commission and the liaison agency of the Member State concerned.’.
Povećanju standardne naknade iz stavka 3. točaka (a) i (b) može se dodati iznos od 2 EUR za obračunsku godinu 2018. i iznos od 5 EUR od obračunske godine 2019. ako je Komisija provjerila knjigovodstvene podatke u skladu s člankom 13. prvim podstavkom točkom (b) ove Uredbe i ako se oni smatraju propisno ispunjenima u skladu s člankom 8. stavkom 2.
Article 2
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1217/2009, u trenutku njihova dostavljanja Komisiji ili u roku od 40 radnih dana od datuma kada Komisija obavijesti državu članicu koja ih je dostavila da dostavljeni knjigovodstveni podatci nisu propisno ispunjeni.
This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
U iznimnim i propisno opravdanim slučajevima, Komisija može odlučiti produljiti to razdoblje od 40 radnih dana.
It shall apply from the accounting year 2018.
Datum isteka razdoblja od 40 radnih dana, ili njegovo produljenje, potvrđuje se u pisanom obliku između Komisije i agencija za vezu predmetne države članice.”.
Done at Brussels, 20 November 2018.
Ova Uredba stupa na snagu sedmog dana od dana objave u Službenom listu Europske unije.
For the Commission
Primjenjuje se od obračunske godine 2018.
OJ L 328, 15.12.2009, p. 27.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 20. studenoga 2018.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/220 of 3 February 2015 laying down rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Union (OJ L 46, 19.2.2015, p. 1).
Za Komisiju
laying down procedure and criteria for the application of the economic equilibrium test pursuant to Article 11 of Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council
o utvrđivanju postupka i kriterija za primjenu testa ekonomske ravnoteže na temelju članka 11.
(Text with EEA relevance)
Direktive 2012/34/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća
Having regard to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area, and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 11(4) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,
Whereas:
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu 2012/34/EU Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća od 21. studenoga 2012. o uspostavi jedinstvenog Europskog željezničkog prostora, a posebno njezin članak 11. stavak 4. drugi podstavak,
Directive 2012/34/EU as amended by Directive (EU) 2016/2370 has opened up the market for domestic rail passenger services with a view to completing the single European railway area.
budući da:
This may have implications for the organisation and financing of rail passenger services provided under a public service contract.
Direktivom 2012/34/EU kako je izmijenjena Direktivom (EU) 2016/2370 otvoreno je tržište za usluge domaćeg željezničkog prijevoza putnika s ciljem dovršavanja jedinstvenog europskog željezničkog prostora.
Member States may introduce in their legislation the possibility to deny access to the infrastructure where the economic equilibrium of such public service contracts would be compromised by new open access rail passenger services.
To može utjecati na organizaciju i financiranje usluga željezničkog prijevoza putnika koje se pružaju na temelju ugovora o javnim uslugama.
On the other hand, such services, depending on their specific features, such as quality characteristics, timing, destinations served and prospective customers targeted, may not be in head-on competition with public services, and thus cause only limited impact on the economic equilibrium of a public service contract.
Države članice mogu u svoje zakonodavstvo uvesti mogućnost odbijanja pristupa infrastrukturi u slučajevima u kojima bi ekonomska ravnoteža takvih ugovora o javnim uslugama bila ugrožena novim uslugama željezničkog prijevoza putnika otvorenog pristupa.
Furthermore, there may be positive network effects for public service operators, net benefits to passengers or wider social benefits that should be taken into account.
S druge strane, takve usluge, ovisno o njihovim posebnim svojstvima, kao što su kvaliteta, vremenski raspored, odredišta za koja se pružaju i ciljani korisnici, možda se ne natječu s javnim uslugama i tako imaju ograničen utjecaj na ekonomsku ravnotežu ugovora o javnim uslugama.
It is therefore necessary to balance the legitimate interests of operators performing a public service contract and competent authorities, on the one hand, with the overarching objectives of completing the single European railway area and reaping its wider social benefits, on the other hand.
Nadalje, mogu postojati pozitivni mrežni učinci za operatere javne usluge, neto koristi za putnike ili šire društvene koristi koje treba uzeti u obzir.
The economic equilibrium test should achieve a balance between those competing interests.
Stoga je potrebno uravnotežiti legitimne interese operatera koji izvršavaju ugovor o javnim uslugama i nadležnih tijela s jedne strane, i glavne ciljeve za dovršenje jedinstvenog Europskog željezničkog prostora te iskorištavanje širih socijalnih koristi, s druge strane.
Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council lays down that, as a reward for discharging public service obligations in the provision of rail passenger services, operators may be granted financial compensation or exclusive rights, or both.
Testom ekonomske ravnoteže trebala bi se postići ravnoteža između tih suprotstavljenih interesa.
However, the grant of exclusive rights to railway operators should not result in the foreclosure of domestic rail passenger markets.
Uredbom (EZ) br. 1370/2007 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća utvrđuje se da se operaterima kao nagrada za ispunjavanje obveza pružanja usluga željezničkog prijevoza putnika mogu dodijeliti financijska naknada ili isključiva prava, ili oboje.
Such exclusive rights should not preclude the right of access of other railway undertakings, unless the economic equilibrium test shows that, taking into account the value of the exclusive rights, the new rail passenger service would have a substantial negative impact on the profitability of services operated under the public service contract or the net cost of their provision for the competent authority, or both, depending on risk-sharing arrangements stipulated in the public service contract.
Međutim, dodjela isključivih prava željezničkim prijevoznicima ne bi trebala imati za posljedicu zatvaranje domaćih tržišta željezničkog prijevoza putnika.
An economic equilibrium test should be requested only in respect of passenger rail services which are not provided under a public service contract and which are either entirely new or entail a substantial modification of an existing service.
Takva isključiva prava ne bi trebala isključivati pravo pristupa drugih željezničkih prijevoznika, osim ako test ekonomske ravnoteže pokaže da bi, uzimajući u obzir vrijednost isključivih prava, nova usluga željezničkog prijevoza putnika imala znatan negativan utjecaj na profitabilnost usluga koje se obavljaju u okviru ugovora o javnim uslugama ili neto trošak njihova pružanja za nadležno tijelo, ili oboje, ovisno o aranžmanima za podjelu rizika predviđenima u ugovoru o javnim uslugama.
This notion encompasses also commercial services provided by the same operator that carries out the public service contract.
Treba provesti test ekonomske ravnoteže samo u pogledu usluga željezničkog prijevoza putnika koje se ne pružaju u okviru ugovora o javnim uslugama i koje su potpuno nove ili podrazumijevaju znatnu izmjenu postojeće usluge.
It should be for the regulatory body to assess whether a proposed modification of a rail passenger service should be considered substantial.
Taj pojam obuhvaća i komercijalne usluge koje pruža isti operater koji izvršava ugovor o javnim uslugama.
An increase in frequencies or number of stops could be considered a substantial modification.
Regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi procijeniti bi li se predložena izmjena usluge željezničkog prijevoza putnika trebala smatrati znatnom.
A variation in prices should not be considered a substantial modification, unless it is inconsistent with normal market behaviour, and where relevant, with the business plan submitted to the regulatory body at the time the previous economic equilibrium test was carried out.
Povećanje učestalosti ili broja zaustavljanja može se smatrati znatnom izmjenom.
The regulatory body's decision should include an assessment of net benefits to customers arising from the new rail passenger service in the short and medium term, and should take into account the technical information provided by the infrastructure manager on relevant infrastructure requirements and on expected impacts on network performance and on optimal capacity utilisation by all applicants.
Promjena cijena ne bi se trebala smatrati znatnom izmjenom, osim ako nije u skladu s uobičajenim tržišnim ponašanjem te, prema potrebi, s poslovnim planom koji je dostavljen regulatornom tijelu u trenutku obavljanja prethodnog testa ekonomske ravnoteže.
The regulatory body should be entitled both to assess the likely impact of the new passenger service, and to assess whether such impact would be substantial and thus compromise the economic equilibrium of the existing public service contract.
Odluka regulatornog tijela trebala bi uključivati procjenu neto koristi za korisnike koje proizlaze iz nove usluge željezničkog prijevoza putnika u kratkom i srednjem roku te bi trebala uzeti u obzir tehničke informacije koje pruža upravitelj infrastrukture o relevantnim zahtjevima u pogledu infrastrukture i o očekivanim učincima na izvedbu mreže te optimalno korištenje kapacitetom svih podnositelja zahtjeva.
In order to avoid the interruption of a new rail passenger service that has already started, and to give legal certainty to this new service about its possibility to operate, the period during which an economic equilibrium test can be requested should be limited and linked to the time of the applicant's notification of its interest in operating a new rail passenger service.
Regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi imati pravo i na ocjenjivanje vjerojatnog učinka nove usluge prijevoza putnika te procjenu bi li takav učinak bio znatan i time ugrozio ekonomsku ravnotežu postojećih ugovora o javnim uslugama.
To be admissible, a request for an economic equilibrium test should include substantiation that the economic equilibrium of the public service contract would be compromised by the proposed new service.
Kako bi se spriječilo prekidanje nove usluge željezničkog prijevoza putnika nakon njezina početka rada i kako bi se toj novoj usluzi osigurala pravna sigurnost u pogledu mogućnosti rada, razdoblje za traženje testa ekonomske ravnoteže trebalo bi biti ograničeno i povezano s vremenom podnositeljeve obavijesti o namjeri da pokrene novu uslugu željezničkog prijevoza putnika.
In order to ensure legal certainty for all parties involved and to enable the infrastructure manager to process requests for capacity according to the procedure set out in Section 3 of Chapter IV of Directive 2012/34/EU, the regulatory body should take a decision on economic equilibrium within a pre-determined time frame, and in any event before the deadline for receipt of requests of capacity, set by the infrastructure manager in accordance with point 3 of Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU.
Kako bi bio prihvatljiv, zahtjev za test ekonomske ravnoteže treba sadržavati dokaze o tome da nova usluga neće ugroziti ekonomsku ravnotežu ugovora o javnim uslugama.
However, if at the time the applicant's notification is received, a public service contract is in the process of being competitively tendered and an economic equilibrium test has been requested, the regulatory body may decide to suspend consideration of the application for the new rail passenger service for a limited period of time pending the award of the new public service contract.
Kako bi se osigurala pravna sigurnost za sve uključene strane i upravitelju infrastrukture omogućilo da obrađuje zahtjeve za kapacitet u skladu s postupkom utvrđenim u odjeljku 3. poglavlja IV.
The suspension should last for no longer than 12 months from the receipt of the applicant's notification or until the tender process has concluded, whichever is sooner.
Direktive 2012/34/EU, regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi donijeti odluku o ekonomskoj ravnoteži u unaprijed utvrđenom vremenskom okviru, a u svakom slučaju prije roka za primitak zahtjeva za kapacitet, koji je postavio upravitelj infrastrukture u skladu s točkom 3.
These specific provisions are without prejudice to the application of this regulation to a public service contract which is on-going at the time the applicant's notification is received.
Priloga VII.
In these circumstances, and where the economic equilibrium test on the existing public service contract demonstrates that access can be granted, such access should be time-limited until the expiry of the existing public service contract.
Direktivi 2012/34/EU.
The economic equilibrium of a public service contract should be regarded as compromised if the proposed new service would have a substantial negative impact on the level of profit for the public service operator and/or their operation would imply a substantial increase in net cost for the competent authority.
Međutim, ako se u trenutku primitka obavijesti podnositelja zahtjeva provodi konkurentno nadmetanje za ugovor o javnim uslugama te je zatražen test ekonomske ravnoteže, regulatorno tijelo može odlučiti suspendirati razmatranje zahtjeva za novu uslugu željezničkog prijevoza putnika tijekom ograničenog razdoblja do dodjele novog ugovora o javnim uslugama.
When assessing whether an impact is substantial, the regulatory body should take into account criteria such as whether the new service would jeopardise the viability and endanger the continuity of the public service, either because performance of the public contract would not be economically sustainable for the public service operator, or because it would entail a substantial increase in net cost for the competent authority.
Suspenzija bi trebala trajati najviše 12 mjeseci od primitka obavijesti podnositelja zahtjeva ili do zaključenja natječajnog postupka, ovisno o tome što nastupi prije.
Beyond the economic analysis, the regulatory body should also assess and take into account the net benefits to customers in the short and medium term and any impacts in network performance and capacity use.
Tim posebnim odredbama ne dovodi se u pitanje primjena ove Uredbe na ugovor o javnim uslugama koji je u tijeku u trenutku obavijesti podnositelja zahtjeva.
The regulatory body should take into account the technical information provided by the infrastructure manager on relevant infrastructure requirements, on expected impacts on network performance and on optimal capacity utilisation by all applicants.
U tim okolnostima i ako se testom ekonomske ravnoteže postojećeg ugovora o javnim uslugama dokaže da se pristup može dodijeliti, takav bi pristup trebao biti vremenski ograničen do isteka postojećeg ugovora o javnim uslugama.
The economic analysis should focus on the impact of the proposed new service on the public service contract as a whole, including the services specifically affected, for its entire time-scale, taking into account the value of any existing exclusive rights that may have been granted.
Ekonomska ravnoteža ugovora o javnim uslugama trebala bi se smatrati ugroženom ako bi predložena nova usluga imala znatan negativan utjecaj na razinu dobiti za operatera javne usluge i/ili bi pružanje tih usluga podrazumijevalo znatno povećanje neto troška za nadležno tijelo.
No predefined quantified threshold regarding the damage should be applied strictly or in isolation, and no such thresholds should be set in national legislation.
Pri procjeni je li učinak znatan, regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi uzeti u obzir određene kriterije, npr. bi li nova usluga ugrozila održivost i kontinuitet javne usluge, bilo zbog toga što izvršenje ugovora o javnoj nabavi ne bi bilo ekonomski održivo za operatera javne usluge ili zbog toga što bi to dovelo do znatnog povećanja neto troška za nadležno tijelo.
The assessment should be based on an objective methodology adopted by the regulatory body having regard to the specificities of rail transport in the Member State concerned.
Osim ekonomske analize, regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi procijeniti i uzeti u obzir neto koristi za korisnike u kratkom i srednjem roku te učinke na izvedbu mreže i korištenje kapaciteta na mreži.
When the regulatory body comes to the conclusion that the new rail passenger service would compromise the economic equilibrium of the public service contract, in its decision it should indicate, if relevant, possible changes to the new rail passenger service which would enable access to be granted.
Regulatorno tijelo trebalo bi uzeti u obzir tehničke informacije koje pruža upravitelj infrastrukture o relevantnim zahtjevima u pogledu infrastrukture, o očekivanim učincima na izvedbu mreže te optimalno korištenje kapacitetom svih podnositelja zahtjeva.
The regulatory body may issue recommendations to the competent authority as regards other possible conditions that would enable access to be granted, in particular in the light of its analysis of net benefits to customers arising from the new rail passenger service.
Ekonomska analiza trebala bi biti usmjerena na utjecaj predložene nove usluge na ugovor o javnim uslugama u cjelini, uključujući usluge na koje postoji konkretan utjecaj, tijekom cijelog njezina trajanja, uzimajući u obzir vrijednost svih postojećih isključivih prava koja su mogla biti dodijeljena.
If the application for access concerns a new rail passenger service as defined in Article 3(36) of Directive 2012/34/EU and the objective economic analysis of the regulatory body shows that the new passenger service would have a substantial negative impact on the economic equilibrium of a public service contract, the regulatory body should determine conditions which would enable access to be granted in accordance with Article 11a of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Ni jedan unaprijed utvrđeni kvantificirani prag u pogledu štete ne bi se trebao primjenjivati strogo ili izdvojeno, a u nacionalnom zakonodavstvu ne bi trebalo utvrditi takve pragove.
In all its activities related to the economic equilibrium test, the regulatory body should not disclose confidential or commercially sensitive information received from the parties.
Procjena bi se trebala temeljiti na objektivnoj metodologiji koju regulatorno tijelo donese uzimajući u obzir specifičnosti željezničkog prijevoza u predmetnoj državi članici.