natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is capable of preventing NCAs from taking any action at all or limiting their enforcement actions.
Stoga je u takvim slučajevima usporedne primjene nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja i prava Unije ključno da nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje imaju jednaka jamstva neovisnosti, resurse te provedbene ovlasti i ovlasti za izricanje novčanih kazni koji su potrebni kako bi se osiguralo da se ne postigne različit ishod.
The lack of guarantees of independence, resources, and enforcement and fining powers for many NCAs to be able to apply Articles 101 and 102 TFEU effectively means that undertakings engaging in anti-competitive practices might face very different outcomes in proceedings, depending on the Member State in which they are active.
Osim toga, davanje ovlasti nacionalnim tijelima nadležnima za tržišno natjecanje da prikupe sve informacije koje se odnose na poduzetnika koji je predmet istrage, među ostalim u digitalnom obliku, bez obzira na medij na kojem su pohranjene, utjecalo bi i na opseg ovlasti nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje u slučajevima u kojima ona u ranim fazama svojih postupaka poduzmu odgovarajuću istražnu mjeru na temelju nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja koje se primjenjuje usporedno s člancima 101. i 102.
They might be subject to no enforcement under Article 101 or 102 TFEU or they might only be subject to ineffective enforcement.
UFEU-a.
For example, in some Member States, undertakings can escape liability for fines simply by restructuring.
Davanjem nacionalnim tijelima nadležnima za tržišno natjecanje ovlasti pretrage različitog opsega, ovisno o tome hoće li ona u konačnici primijeniti samo nacionalno pravo tržišnog natjecanja ili usporedno i članke 101. i 102.
Uneven enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, whether applied on a stand-alone basis or in parallel with national competition law, results in missed opportunities to remove barriers to market entry and to create fairer competitive markets throughout the Union where undertakings compete on their merits.
UFEU-a, narušila bi se učinkovitost provedbe prava tržišnog natjecanja na unutarnjem tržištu.
Undertakings and consumers particularly suffer in those Member States where NCAs are less equipped to be effective enforcers.
U skladu s tim, područje primjene ove Direktive trebalo bi obuhvaćati i primjenu članaka 101. i 102.
Undertakings cannot compete on the merits if there are safe havens for anti-competitive practices, for example, because evidence of anti-competitive practices cannot be collected or because undertakings are able to escape liability for fines.
UFEU-a na samostalnoj osnovi i usporednu primjenu nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja na isti predmet.
Undertakings therefore have a disincentive to enter such markets, to exercise their rights of establishment, and to provide goods and services there.
U pogledu zaštite izjava poduzetnika pokajnika i prijedloga za nagodbu, ova bi Direktiva trebala obuhvaćati i primjenu nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja na samostalnoj osnovi.
Consumers based in Member States where there is less enforcement miss out on the benefits of effective competition enforcement.
Mnogim nacionalnim tijelima nadležnima za tržišno natjecanje nacionalno pravo onemogućuje da raspolažu potrebnim jamstvima neovisnosti, resursima te provedbenim ovlastima i ovlastima za izricanje novčanih kazni kako bi ona mogla učinkovito provoditi pravila Unije o tržišnom natjecanju.
Uneven enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, whether applied on a stand-alone basis or in parallel with national competition law, throughout the Union thus distorts competition in the internal market and undermines its proper functioning.
Time se narušava njihova sposobnost učinkovite primjene članaka 101. i 102.
Gaps and limitations in the tools and guarantees of NCAs undermine the system of parallel powers for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, which is designed to work as a cohesive whole based on close cooperation within the European Competition Network.
UFEU-a i primjene nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja usporedno s člancima 101. i 102.
This system depends on authorities being able to rely on each other to carry out fact-finding measures on each other's behalf in order to foster cooperation and mutual assistance among the Member States.
UFEU-a.
However, it does not work well when there are still NCAs that do not have adequate fact-finding tools.
Na primjer, u okviru nacionalnog prava mnoga nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje nemaju učinkovite instrumente za otkrivanje povreda članaka 101. i 102.
In other key respects, NCAs are not able to provide each other with mutual assistance.
UFEU-a ili za izricanje novčanih kazni poduzetnicima koji krše propise ili nemaju odgovarajuće ljudske i financijske resurse te operativnu neovisnost za učinkovitu primjenu članaka 101. i 102.
For example, in the majority of Member States, undertakings that operate across borders are able to evade paying fines simply by not having a legal presence in some of the territories of Member States in which they are active.
UFEU-a.
This reduces incentives to comply with Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
To može prouzročiti potpuni izostanak djelovanja nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje ili ograničiti njihove mjere provedbe.
The resulting ineffective enforcement distorts competition for law-abiding undertakings and undermines consumer confidence in the internal market, particularly in the digital environment.
Budući da mnoga nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje ne raspolažu jamstvima neovisnosti, resursima te provedbenim ovlastima i ovlastima za izricanje novčanih kazni kako bi mogla učinkovito primjenjivati članke 101. i 102.
In order to ensure a truly common competition enforcement area in the Union that provides a more even level playing field for undertakings operating in the internal market and reduces unequal conditions for consumers, there is a need to put in place fundamental guarantees of independence, adequate financial, human, technical and technological resources and minimum enforcement and fining powers for applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and for applying national competition law in parallel to those Articles so that national administrative competition authorities can be fully effective.
UFEU-a, ishodi postupaka u pogledu poduzetnika koji primjenjuju protutržišne prakse mogu biti vrlo različiti ovisno o državi članici u kojoj posluju.
It is appropriate to base this Directive on the dual legal basis of Articles 103 and 114 TFEU.
Moguće je da uopće ne podliježu provedbi na temelju članka 101. ili 102.
This is because this Directive covers not only the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and the application of national competition law in parallel to those Articles, but also covers the gaps and limitations in the tools and guarantees of NCAs needed to apply Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, because such gaps and limitations negatively affect both competition and the proper functioning of the internal market.
UFEU-a ili da samo podliježu neučinkovitoj provedbi.
Putting in place fundamental guarantees to ensure that NCAs apply Articles 101 and 102 TFEU uniformly and effectively should be without prejudice to the ability of Member States to maintain or introduce more extensive guarantees of independence and resources for national administrative competition authorities and more detailed rules on the enforcement and fining powers of NCAs.
Primjerice, u nekim državama članicama poduzetnici mogu već s pomoću restrukturiranja izbjeći obvezu plaćanja novčanih kazni.
In particular, Member States should be able to endow NCAs with additional powers beyond the core set provided for in this Directive to further enhance their effectiveness, such as powers to impose fines on natural persons or, by way of exception, the power to carry out inspections with the consent of those subject to inspection.
Zbog neujednačene provedbe članaka 101. i 102.
Conversely, detailed rules are necessary in the area of conditions for granting leniency for secret cartels.
UFEU-a, bez obzira na to primjenjuju li se na samostalnoj osnovi ili usporedno s nacionalnim pravom tržišnog natjecanja, propuštaju se prilike uklanjanja prepreka pristupanju tržištu i uspostave pravednijih konkurentnih tržišta širom Unije na kojima se poduzetnici natječu na temelju svoje uspješnosti.
Undertakings will only disclose secret cartels in which they have participated if they have sufficient legal certainty that they will benefit from immunity from fines.
Posljedice trpe posebno poduzetnici i potrošači u onim državama članicama u kojima su nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje slabije opremljena za učinkovitu provedbu pravila o tržišnom natjecanju.
The marked differences between the leniency programmes in the Member States lead to legal uncertainty for potential leniency applicants.
Poduzetnici se ne mogu natjecati na temelju uspješnosti ako postoje sigurna utočišta za protutržišne prakse, na primjer zato što nije moguće prikupiti dokaze o protutržišnim praksama ili zato što poduzetnici mogu izbjeći obvezu plaćanja novčanih kazni.
This may weaken their incentives to apply for leniency.
Poduzetnike se stoga odvraća od ulaska na ta tržišta, ostvarivanja svojih prava poslovnog nastana te pružanja robe i usluga na tim tržištima.
If Member States were able to implement or apply clearer and harmonised rules for leniency in the area covered by this Directive, this would not only contribute to the objective of maintaining incentives for applicants to disclose secret cartels, in order to render competition enforcement in the Union as effective as possible, but would also guarantee a level playing field for undertakings operating in the internal market.
Potrošači u državama članicama u kojima je provedba slabija ne ostvaruju koristi od učinkovite provedbe tržišnog natjecanja.
This should not prevent Member States from applying leniency programmes that cover not only secret cartels, but also other infringements of Article 101 TFEU and equivalent provisions of national competition law, or from accepting leniency applications from natural persons acting in their own name.
Stoga se neujednačenom provedbom članaka 101. i 102.
This Directive should also be without prejudice to leniency programmes that exclusively provide for immunity from sanctions in criminal judicial proceedings for the enforcement of Article 101 TFEU.
UFEU-a, bez obzira na to primjenjuju li se na samostalnoj osnovi ili usporedno s nacionalnim pravom tržišnog natjecanja, širom Unije narušavaju tržišno natjecanje na unutarnjem tržištu i njegovo pravilno funkcioniranje.
This Directive should not apply to national laws insofar as they provide for the imposition of criminal sanctions on natural persons, with the exception of the rules governing the interplay of leniency programmes with the imposition of sanctions on natural persons.
Nedostaci i ograničenja u instrumentima i jamstvima nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje narušavaju sustav usporednih nadležnosti za provedbu članaka 101. i 102.
It also should not apply to national laws that provide for the imposition of administrative sanctions on natural persons that do not operate as an independent economic actor on a market.
UFEU-a, koji je osmišljen tako da funkcionira kao povezana cjelina na temelju bliske suradnje u okviru Europske mreže za tržišno natjecanje.
Pursuant to Article 35 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, Member States can entrust the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU exclusively to an administrative authority, as is the case in most jurisdictions, or they can entrust this to both judicial and administrative authorities.
Taj sustav ovisi o tome može li se jedno nadležno tijelo osloniti na drugo da u njegovo ime provede mjere utvrđivanja činjeničnog stanja kako bi se potaknula suradnja i uzajamna pomoć među državama članicama.
In the latter case, the administrative authority is at least primarily responsible for conducting the investigation, while the judicial authority is typically entrusted with the power to take decisions imposing fines and can have the power to take other decisions, such as finding an infringement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
Međutim, to ne funkcionira dobro ako još ima nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje koja nemaju primjerene instrumente za utvrđivanje činjeničnog stanja.
The exercise of the powers, conferred by this Directive on NCAs, including the investigative powers, should be subject to appropriate safeguards which at least comply with the general principles of Union law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in particular in the context of proceedings which could give rise to the imposition of penalties.
U drugim ključnim aspektima nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje ne mogu si pružati uzajamnu pomoć.
These safeguards include the right to good administration and the respect of undertakings' rights of defence, an essential component of which is the right to be heard.
Na primjer, u većini država članica poduzetnici koji posluju na prekograničnoj osnovi mogu izbjeći plaćanje novčanih kazni već ako nemaju pravnu prisutnost na državnim područjima nekih država članica u kojima posluju.
In particular, NCAs should inform the parties under investigation of the preliminary objections raised against them under Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU in the form of a statement of objections or a similar measure prior to taking a decision finding an infringement, and those parties should have an opportunity to make their views on those objections known effectively before such a decision is taken.
Time se smanjuju poticaji za poštovanje članaka 101. i 102.
The right to access the file should be subject to the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets and should not extend to confidential information and internal documents of, and correspondence between, the NCAs and the Commission.
Neučinkovitom provedbom koja iz toga proizlazi narušava se tržišno natjecanje za poduzetnike koji posluju u skladu sa zakonom te potkopava povjerenje potrošača u unutarnje tržište, posebno u digitalnom okruženju.
Moreover, for decisions of NCAs, in particular those decisions finding an infringement of Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU, and imposing remedies or fines, the addressees should have the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal, in accordance with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
S ciljem postizanja istinski zajedničkog područja provedbe tržišnog natjecanja u Uniji, na kojem se za poduzetnike koji posluju na unutarnjem tržištu osiguravaju ravnopravniji uvjeti, a za potrošače smanjuju nejednaki uvjeti, postoji potreba da se uspostave temeljna jamstva neovisnosti, odgovarajući financijski, ljudski, tehnički i tehnološki resursi te minimalne provedbene ovlasti i ovlasti za izricanje novčanih kazni za primjenu članaka 101. i 102.
Such decisions should be reasoned so as to allow addressees of such decisions to ascertain the reasons for the decision and to exercise their right to an effective remedy.
UFEU-a i za primjenu nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja usporedno s tim člancima kako bi nacionalna upravna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje mogla biti potpuno učinkovita.
Moreover, in accordance with the right to good administration, Member States should ensure that, when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, NCAs conduct proceedings within a reasonable timeframe, taking into account the specificities of each case.
Primjereno je utemeljiti ovu Direktivu na dvojnoj pravnoj osnovi članaka 103. i 114.
The design of those safeguards should strike a balance between the respect of the fundamental rights of undertakings and the duty to ensure that Articles 101 and 102 TFEU are effectively enforced.
UFEU-a.
The exchange of information between NCAs, and the use of such information in evidence for the application of Article 101 or Article 102 TFEU, should be carried out pursuant to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.
To je zato što se ovom Direktivom ne obuhvaća samo primjena članaka 101. i 102.
Empowering national administrative competition authorities to apply Articles 101 and 102 TFEU impartially and in the common interest of the effective enforcement of the Union competition rules is an essential component of the effective and uniform application of those rules.
UFEU-a i usporedno s tim člancima primjena nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja, nego se njome obuhvaćaju i nedostaci i ograničenja u instrumentima i jamstvima nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje koji su potrebni za primjenu članaka 101. i 102.
The operational independence of national administrative competition authorities should be strengthened in order to ensure the effective and uniform application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU.
UFEU-a jer ti nedostaci i ograničenja negativno utječu i na tržišno natjecanje i na pravilno funkcioniranje unutarnjeg tržišta.
To this end, express provision should be made in national law to ensure that when applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, national administrative competition authorities are protected against external intervention or political pressure that is liable to jeopardise their independent assessment of the matters before them.
Uspostavom temeljnih jamstava kako bi se osiguralo da nacionalna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje ujednačeno i učinkovito primjenjuju članke 101. i 102.
For that purpose, the grounds regarding the dismissal from the national administrative competition authority of those persons who take decisions exercising the powers referred to in Articles 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16 of this Directive should be laid down in advance in national law in order to remove any reasonable doubt as to their impartiality and their imperviousness to external factors.
UFEU-a ne bi se trebalo dovoditi u pitanje sposobnost država članica da zadrže ili uvedu opsežnija jamstva neovisnosti i resurse za nacionalna upravna tijela nadležna za tržišno natjecanje te detaljnija pravila o provedbenim ovlastima i ovlastima za izricanje novčanih kazni nacionalnih tijela nadležnih za tržišno natjecanje.
Similarly, clear and transparent rules and procedures for the selection, recruitment or appointment of those persons should be laid down in advance in national law.
Posebno, države članice trebale bi moći nacionalnim tijelima nadležnima za tržišno natjecanje, uz temeljni niz ovlasti predviđen ovom Direktivom, dodijeliti dodatne ovlasti kako bi se dodatno poboljšala njihova učinkovitost, kao što su ovlasti za izricanje novčanih kazni fizičkim osobama ili, iznimno, ovlast za provedbu pretraga uz suglasnost onih nad kojima se provode.
Moreover, to ensure the impartiality of national administrative competition authorities, the fines that they impose for infringements of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU should not be used to finance these authorities directly.
S druge strane, potrebna su detaljna pravila u području uvjeta za dodjelu oslobođenja ili umanjenja za tajne kartele.
To ensure the operational independence of national administrative competition authorities, their heads, staff and those who take decisions should act with integrity and refrain from any action which is incompatible with the performance of their duties.
Poduzetnici će otkriti tajne kartele u kojima su sudjelovali samo ako imaju dovoljnu pravnu sigurnost da će biti oslobođeni od novčanih kazni.
To prevent the independent assessment by heads, staff and those who take decisions from being jeopardised, they should refrain from any incompatible actions, whether gainful or not, both during their employment or term of office and for a reasonable period thereafter.
Znatne razlike među pokajničkim programima u državama članicama dovode do pravne nesigurnosti za potencijalne podnositelje zahtjeva za oslobođenje ili umanjenje.
This means that during their employment or their term of office, the staff and those who take decisions should not be able to deal with proceedings for the application of Article 101 or 102 TFEU in which they have been involved or which directly concern undertakings or associations of undertakings by which they have been employed or otherwise professionally engaged, if this has the potential to compromise their impartiality in a specific case.
To može oslabiti njihove poticaje za podnošenje takvih zahtjeva.
Similarly, the staff and those who take decisions, as well as their close relatives, should not have any interest in any businesses or organisations which are subject to proceedings for the application of Article 101 or 102 TFEU in which they take part, if this has the potential to compromise their impartiality in a specific case.
Kada bi države članice mogle provoditi ili primjenjivati jasnija i usklađena pravila o oslobođenju ili umanjenju u području obuhvaćenom ovom Direktivom, time bi se ne samo doprinijelo cilju zadržavanja poticaja za podnositelje zahtjeva da otkriju tajne kartele kako bi se provedba tržišnog natjecanja u Uniji učinila što učinkovitijom, nego bi se i jamčilo jednakost uvjeta za sve poduzetnike koji posluju na unutarnjem tržištu.
The assessment of whether their impartiality might be impaired in a specific case should take into account the nature and the magnitude of the interest and the level of involvement or engagement of the individual concerned.
Time se države članice ne bi trebalo spriječiti da primjenjuju pokajničke programe koji obuhvaćaju ne samo tajne kartele, nego i druge povrede članka 101.
Where it is necessary to ensure the impartiality of the investigation and the decision-making process, the individual concerned should be required to recuse herself or himself from the specific case.
UFEU-a i jednakovrijednih odredaba nacionalnog prava tržišnog natjecanja, ili da prihvaćaju zahtjeve fizičkih osoba za oslobođenje ili umanjenje koji djeluju u svoje ime.
This also means that, for a reasonable period after leaving the national administrative competition authority, whenever former staff or those who took decisions engage in an occupation which is related to the proceedings for the application of Article 101 or 102 TFEU with which they were dealing during their employment or term of office, they should not be involved in the same case in their new occupation.
Ovom se Direktivom također ne bi trebalo dovoditi u pitanje pokajničke programe kojima se isključivo predviđa oslobođenje od sankcija u kaznenom sudskom postupku za provedbu članka 101.
The length of that period might be determined by taking into account the nature of the new occupation of the individuals concerned as well as the level of their involvement and responsibility in the same proceedings during their employment or term in office in the national administrative competition authority.
UFEU-a.
Every national administrative competition authority should publish a code of conduct that, without prejudice to the application of stricter national rules, covers rules on conflicts of interest.
Ova se Direktiva ne bi trebala primjenjivati na nacionalne propise u mjeri u kojoj se njima predviđa izricanje kaznenih sankcija fizičkim osobama, uz iznimku pravila kojima se uređuje interakcija između pokajničkih programa i izricanja sankcija fizičkim osobama.
The operational independence of national administrative competition authorities should not preclude either judicial review or parliamentary supervision in accordance with national law.
Također se ne bi trebala primjenjivati na nacionalne propise kojima se predviđa izricanje administrativnih sankcija fizičkim osobama koje ne posluju kao neovisan gospodarski subjekt na tržištu.
Accountability requirements should also contribute to ensuring the credibility and the legitimacy of the actions of national administrative competition authorities.
U skladu s člankom 35.
Proportionate accountability requirements include the publication by national administrative competition authorities of periodic reports on their activities to a governmental or parliamentary body.
Uredbe (EZ) br. 1/2003 države članice mogu povjeriti provedbu članaka 101. i 102.