natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
DEFINITIVE ANTI-DUMPING MEASURES
Tvrdio je da je Komisija oduzimanjem prosječne dobiti tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka i dodavanjem ciljne dobiti zanemarila različite razine dobiti koje su proizvođači iz Unije ostvarili za različite modele.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed in order to prevent further injury being caused to the Union industry by the dumped imports of the product concerned.
Ta zainteresirana strana tvrdila je da bi neštetnu cijenu trebalo izračunati oduzimanjem prosječne dobiti po PCN-u od stvarnih cijena prije nego što se doda ciljna dobit.
Injury elimination level
Komisija podsjeća da se u osnovnoj uredbi ne navodi nikakva specifična metodologija za izračun razine uklanjanja štete.
For the purpose of determining the level of these measures, account was taken of the dumping margins found and the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the injury sustained by the Union producers, without exceeding the dumping margins found.
Nadalje, Komisijino utvrđivanje odnosi se na istovjetni proizvod koji prodaje industrija Unije.
Following the imposition of provisional measures, an exporting producer submitted that the Commission's methodology to calculate the non-injurious price of the Union producers was flawed.
S obzirom na to potpuno je prihvatljivo ukloniti prosječnu dobit industrije Unije iz njezinih prosječnih prodajnih cijena kako bi se utvrdio prosječni trošak proizvodnje istovjetnog proizvoda i zatim dodati ciljnu dobit za izračun razine uklanjanja štete.
It claimed that by deducing the average profit during the investigation period and adding the target profit, the Commission disregarded the different profit levels achieved by the Union producers for different models.
Komisija je u prošlosti dosljedno primjenjivala tu metodologiju i ima znatnu slobodu u provedbi te ocjene.
This interested party claimed that the non-injurious price should be calculated by deducting from the actual prices the average profit per PCN before adding the target profit.
U ovom se ispitnom postupku šteta ocjenjuje za sve vrste proizvoda u cjelini.
The Commission recalls that the basic Regulation does not provide any specific methodology to calculate the injury elimination level.
Zaista, svi pokazatelji štete, uključujući profitabilnost i ciljnu dobit, izraženi su kao prosjek za sve vrste predmetnog proizvoda.
Furthermore, the Commission's determination concerns the like product sold by the Union industry.
Pri utvrđivanju neštetne cijene cilj je iz industrije Unije ukloniti štetu koju uzrokuje dampinški uvoz u cjelini.
In this respect, it is perfectly acceptable to remove the average profit of the Union industry from its average sales prices to determine the average cost of production of the like product and then add the target profit to calculate the injury elimination level.
Da bi se uklonila ta šteta dovoljno je neštetnu cijenu utvrditi ravnomjernim povećanjem prodajne cijene svih vrsta proizvoda za razliku između stvarne dobiti tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka i ciljne dobiti, čime se industriji Unije omogućuje da ostvari ciljnu dobit.
The Commission has consistently used this methodology in the past and holds significant discretion when carrying out this assessment.
Nije potrebno pojedinačno ocjenjivati profitabilnost za svaku pojedinu vrstu proizvoda.
Indeed, all injury indicators including the profitability and the target profit are expressed as an average for all product types of the product concerned.
Umjesto toga, podnositelj pritužbe tvrdio je da bi se ciljna dobit mogla utvrditi u odnosu na ciljnu dobit klasičnih bicikala (8 %) koja bi se prilagodila prema gore za 1,5 % kako bi se uzeli u obzir zahtjevi u pogledu dodatne tehnologije, veće dodane vrijednosti i dodatnog ulaganja.
When establishing the non-injurious price, this is done with a view to remove the injury from the Union industry caused by the dumped imports as a whole.
Komisija podsjeća da je ciljna dobit ona dobit koju industrija Unije kao cjelina može ostvariti kada nema štetnog dampinga.
In order to remove that injury, it is sufficient if the non-injurious price is established by uniformly increasing the sales price of all product types by the difference between the actual profit during the investigation period and the target profit, thereby allowing the Union industry to achieve the target profit.
Kao posljedica toga, ona se ne može utvrditi na temelju dobiti koju je ostvario odabrani broj proizvođača iz Unije.
It is not necessary to individually assess the profitability situation for each individual product type.
Stoga se argument morao odbaciti.
The complainant disagreed with the target profit used by the Commission for calculating the non-injurious price.
Kad je riječ o drugoj tvrdnji (ciljna dobit korištena u ispitnom postupku o klasičnim biciklima prilagođena prema gore), Komisija podsjeća da se svaki ispitni postupak provodi na temelju posebnih činjenica predmeta u vezi s predmetnim proizvodom, a ne na temelju činjenica utvrđenih u ispitnim postupcima u vezi s drugim proizvodima.
It submitted that the target profit should not be the average profit from the Union industry but the average profit from the companies not injured by Chinese imports in 2015.
U ovom slučaju Komisija je potvrdila da je upotrijebljena ciljna dobit primjerena i da nije bilo razloga da se koristi ciljnom dobiti drugog proizvoda.
The complainant argued since the target profit is the reasonable profit that the Union producers could achieve in the absence of injury caused by dumped/subsidised imports, the Commission could not by definition take as reference point the profitability of Union producers already materially injured by dumped/subsidised imports.
Stoga se tvrdnja morala odbiti.
As an alternative, the complainant submitted that the target profit could be determined by reference with the target profit of traditional bicycles (8 %) adjusted upwards by 1,5 % to reflect additional technology, higher added value and additional investment requirements.
Nakon konačne objave podnositelj pritužbe ponovio je svoje tvrdnje i tvrdio da je u drugim slučajevima Komisija odstupila od svoje standardne metodologije za utvrđivanje ciljne dobiti u odnosu na relevantne okolnosti.
The Commission recalls that the target profit is the profit that the Union industry as a whole can achieve in the absence of injurious dumping.
Kao što je već navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 210., Komisija podsjeća da se svaki predmet procjenjuje na temelju specifičnih činjenica predmeta.
As a consequence, it cannot be established on the basis of the profit achieved by a selected number of Union producers.
U tom je konkretnom slučaju Komisija zaključila da ne postoji posebna okolnost koja bi opravdala uporabu samo dobiti koju su ostvarili određeni proizvođači, kako je tražio podnositelj pritužbe.
The argument had therefore to be rejected.
Naposljetku, Komisija napominje da je, kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama od 59. do 63., za prilagodbu neštetne cijene industrije Unije uzela u obzir određene troškove koje su imali proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku.
As far as the alternative claim (target profit used in the investigation concerning traditional bicycles adjusted upwards), the Commission recalls that each investigation is carried out on the basis of the specific facts of the case concerning the product concerned and not on facts established in investigations concerning other products.
U skladu s time prilagođena je i razina uklanjanja štete, što je dovelo do smanjenja marže štete za 3 % – 5 %.
In this particular case, the Commission confirmed that the target profit used was appropriate and that there was no reason for it to resort to a target profit of another product.
Kako je opisano u uvodnoj izjavi 72., društvo Giant je nakon konačne objave podnijelo zahtjev u pogledu navedene prilagodbe.
Thus, the claim had to be rejected.
Taj je zahtjev prihvaćen, a nastalo smanjenje marže sniženja ciljnih cijena objavljeno je bez dodatnih primjedbi.
After final disclosure, the complainant reiterated its claims and submitted that in other cases the Commission had deviated from its standard methodology to establish the target profit by reference to relevant circumstances.
Uzimajući u obzir prilagodbu na temelju uvodne izjave 212. te budući da nisu dostavljene dodatne primjedbe u pogledu razine uklanjanja štete, potvrđena je metodologija iz uvodnih izjava od 257. do 262. privremene uredbe.
As already outlined in recital (210), the Commission recalls that each case is assessed on the basis of its specific facts.
Ponuda za preuzimanje obveze u pogledu cijena
In this particular case, the Commission concluded that there was no particular circumstance which would justify the use of the profit achieved by certain producers only, as requested by the complainant.
Nakon objave jedan kineski proizvođač izvoznik, Wettsen Corporation, dostavio je ponudu za preuzimanje obveze u pogledu cijena.
Finally, the Commission notes that, as outlined in recitals (59) to (63), it took into account certain costs incurred by the sampled Union producers to adjust the non-injurious price of the Union industry.
Društvo Wettsen Corporation nije bilo uključeno u uzorak, a iako je zatražilo pojedinačno ispitivanje, taj je zahtjev odbijen zajedno s ostalim zahtjevima za pojedinačno ispitivanje.
The injury elimination level was adjusted accordingly, leading to a reduction of 3 % - 5 % to the injury margin.
Ponuda za preuzimanje obveze u pogledu cijena odbačena je iz više razloga, o kojima je društvo Wettsen Corporation obaviješteno zasebnim dopisom.
As described in recital (72), said adjustment was subject to a claim from Giant following the final disclosure.
Razlozi su bili sljedeći:
That claim was accepted and the resulting decrease of the underselling margin was disclosed without any further comment.
prvo, društvo Wettsen Corporation ima povezani subjekt izvan NRK-a koji također proizvodi električne bicikle;
Taking into account the adjustment made under recital (212) and in the absence of other comments concerning the injury elimination level, the methodology described in recitals (257) to (262) to the provisional Regulation was confirmed.
drugo, u ponudi za preuzimanje obveze u pogledu cijena ponuđena je fiksna najnižna uvozna cijena samo za tri glavne vrste električnih bicikala, čime nisu obuhvaćene sve vrste bicikala koji su se izvozili u Uniju tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka; i
Price undertaking offer
treće, budući da je predložena najniža uvozna cijena po vrsti proizvoda bila prosjek prodajnih cijena za predmetnu vrstu proizvoda, ona bi društvu Wettsen Corporation omogućila prodaju skupljih električnih bicikala po štetnim cijenama uz prividno pridržavanje najniže uvozne cijene.
Following the disclosure one Chinese exporting producer, Wettsen Corporation, submitted a price undertaking offer.
Konačne mjere za NRK
Wettsen Corporation was not sampled, and although it had requested individual examination, that request along with all other requests for individual examination was rejected.
S obzirom na zaključke u vezi s dampingom, štetom, uzročnosti i interesom Unije te u skladu s člankom 9. stavkom 4. osnovne uredbe, treba uvesti konačne antidampinške mjere na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda na razini utvrđene dampinške marže ili marže štete, ovisno o tome koja je niža, u skladu s pravilom niže pristojbe.
The price undertaking offer was rejected for a number of reasons, which was communicated to Wettsen Corporation in a separate letter.
U tom slučaju, osim u slučaju jednog kineskog proizvođača izvoznika, konačnu stopu antidampinške pristojbe trebalo bi u skladu s time odrediti na razini utvrđenih marži štete.
The reasons were as follows:
Napominje se da je antisubvencijski postupak proveden usporedno s antidampinškim postupkom.
first, Wettsen Corporation has a related party outside the PRC who also manufactures electric bicycles;
U skladu s člankom 24. stavkom 1.
second, the price undertaking offer fixed the Minimum Import Price (‘MIP’) only for three major types of electric bicycles which did not cover all the types exported to the Union during the investigation period; and,
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o zaštiti od subvencioniranog uvoza iz zemalja koje nisu članice Europske unije, s obzirom na primjenu pravila niže pristojbe i činjenicu da su konačne subvencijske stope niže od razine uklanjanja štete, primjereno je uvesti konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na razini utvrđenih konačnih subvencijskih stopa i zatim uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu do relevantne razine uklanjanja štete.
third, as the proposed MIP per type was an average of sales prices within that type, it would have allowed sales of higher priced electric bicycles at injurious prices by Wettsen Corporation while seemingly complying with the MIP.
U predmetu Yadea Technology Group Co., Ltd. („društvo Yadea”), utvrđena je marža štete za to drušvo u usporednom antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku na temelju informacija koje je dostavilo društvo Yadea.
Definitive measures for the PRC
Komisija je stoga pri razmatranju kombiniranog učinka antidampinških i kompenzacijskih pristojbi smatrala primjerenim upotrijebiti maržu štete za društvo Yadea za razliku od marže štete za društva koja surađuju u antidampinškom ispitnom postupku.
In view of the conclusions reached with regard to dumping, injury, causation and Union interest, and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, definitive anti-dumping measures should be imposed on the imports of the product concerned at the level of the lower of the dumping and the injury margins found, in accordance with the lesser duty rule.
Isto tako, u slučaju društva Yadea, proizvođača izvoznika s dampinškom maržom nižom od razine uklanjanja štete, konačna kompenzacijska pristojba utvrđena je na razini utvrđene konačne subvencijske stope te je konačna antidampinška pristojba uvedena na razini relevantne dampinške marže umanjene za iznos kompenzacijske pristojbe.
In this case, except for one Chinese exporting producer, the definitive anti-dumping duty rate should accordingly be set at the level of the injury margins found.
To je umanjenje bilo potrebno jer u situaciji u kojoj je uobičajena vrijednost utvrđena na temelju članka 2. stavka 7. točke (a) osnovne uredbe uvođenje kumulirane pristojbe koja odražava razinu subvencioniranja i ukupnu razinu dampinga može dovesti do dvostrukog kompenziranja učinaka subvencioniranja („dvostruko računanje”).
It is noted that an anti-subsidy investigation was carried out in parallel with the anti-dumping investigation.
U skladu s člankom 18. osnovne uredbe, društva koja ne surađuju u antidampinškom postupku (iako surađuju u usporednom antisubvencijskom postupku) podliježu preostaloj dampinškoj marži i marži štete.
Pursuant to Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union, in view of the use of the lesser duty rule and the fact that the definitive subsidy rates are lower than the injury elimination level, it is appropriate to impose a definitive countervailing duty at the level of the established definitive subsidy rates and then impose a definitive anti-dumping duty up to the relevant injury elimination level.
Nakon konačne objave, prihvaćanje zahtjeva društva Giant, opisanog u uvodnim izjavama 72. i 212., te promjena kompenzacijskih pristojbi u usporednom antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku doveli su do promjene antidampinških pristojbi.
In case of Yadea Technology Group Co., Ltd (‘Yadea’), a company-specific injury margin was established in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation on the basis of the information provided by Yadea.
Ta je promjena objavljena zainteresiranim stranama i nije bila predmet daljnjih primjedbi u okviru antidampinškog ispitnog postupka.
The Commission therefore considered it appropriate to use Yadea's company-specific injury margin as opposed to the injury margin for cooperating companies in the anti-dumping investigation when considering the combined effect of anti-dumping and countervailing duties.
Stoga su stope po kojima će se uvesti konačna antidampinška pristojba utvrđene u tablici 6. u nastavku:
Also, in the case of Yadea, the exporting producer with a dumping margin lower than the injury elimination level, the definitive countervailing duty was established at the level of the established definitive subsidy rate and a definitive anti-dumping duty was imposed at the level of the relevant dumping margin reduced by the amount of the countervailing duty.
Tablica 6.
That reduction was necessary because in a situation where the normal value is established on the basis of Article 2(7)(a) of the basic Regulation, the imposition of a cumulated duty reflecting the level of subsidisation and the full level of dumping may result in offsetting the effects of subsidisation twice (‘double-counting’).
Konačne mjere
In accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation, the non-cooperating companies in the anti-dumping investigation (although cooperating in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation), are subject to the residual dumping margin and injury margin.
Dampinška marža
Following final disclosure, the acceptance of a claim from Giant described in recitals (72) and (212) as well as a change of the countervailing duties in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation led to a change in the anti-dumping duties.
Stopa subvencije
That change was disclosed to interested parties and was not subject to any further comments in the framework of the anti-dumping investigation.
Kompenzacijska pristojba
Therefore, the rates at which the definitive anti-dumping duty will be imposed are set as in Table 6 as follows:
Antidampinška pristojba
Table 6
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
Definitive measures
Ostala društva koja su surađivala u antidampinškom postupku (uz iznimku društava koja podliježu usporednoj stopi kompenzacijske pristojbe za sva ostala društva – Provedbena uredba (EU) 2019/72 (Prilog I.)
Dumping margin
Ostala društva koja su surađivala u antidampinškom postupku, koja podliježu usporednoj kompenzacijskoj pristojbi za sva ostala društva u Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) 2019/72 (Prilog II.)
Subsidy rate
Društva koja nisu surađivala u antidampinškom postupku, ali koja su surađivala u usporednom antisubvencijskom ispitnom postupku i koja su navedena u Prilogu I. Provedbenoj uredbi (EU) 2019/72 (Prilog III.)
Countervailing duty
Pojedinačne stope antidampinške pristojbe za svako društvo određene u ovoj Uredbi utvrđene su na temelju nalaza ovog ispitnog postupka.
Anti-dumping duty
One stoga odražavaju stanje utvrđeno tijekom tog ispitnog postupka u vezi s tim trgovačkim društvima.
Giant Electric Vehicle (Kunshan) Co., Ltd;
Navedene stope pristojbi (za razliku od pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na području cijele zemlje na „sva ostala društva”) primjenjuju se stoga isključivo na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom iz NRK-a koji proizvode ta društva, odnosno posebno spomenuti pravni subjekti.
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation (with the exception of the companies subject to the parallel countervailing duty rate for all other companies Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72) (Annex I)
Uvezeni predmetni proizvodi koje proizvode druga društva koja se posebno ne spominju u izvršnom dijelu ove Uredbe svojim nazivom i adresom, uključujući subjekte povezane s onima koji se posebno spominju, ne mogu ostvarivati pogodnosti od tih stopa i podliježu stopi pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”.
Other co-operating companies in the anti-dumping investigation, subject to the parallel countervailing duty for all other companies Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72) (Annex II)
Sve zahtjeve kojima se traži primjena tih stopa antidampinških pristojbi za pojedinačna društva (npr. nakon promjene naziva subjekta ili nakon osnivanja novog proizvodnog ili prodajnog subjekta) treba uputiti Komisiji sa svim bitnim podacima, osobito o promjenama djelatnosti društva u vezi s proizvodnjom, domaćom i izvoznom prodajom povezanom s primjerice tom promjenom naziva ili promjenom proizvodnog ili prodajnog subjekta.
Non-cooperating companies in the anti-dumping investigation, but cooperating in the parallel anti-subsidy investigation and listed in the Annex I of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/72 (Annex III)
Prema potrebi, ova će se Uredba u skladu s tim izmijeniti tako što će se ažurirati popis društava na koja se primjenjuju pojedinačne stope antidampinške pristojbe.
The individual company anti-dumping duty rates specified in this Regulation were established on the basis of the findings of this investigation.
U slučajevima u kojima je kompenzacijska pristojba oduzeta od antidampinške pristojbe kako bi se izbjeglo dvostruko računanje, naplatom kompenzacijske pristojbe nastoje se kompenzirati i učinci subvencija protiv kojih se mogu uvesti kompenzacijske mjere i učinci dampinške marže (do razine subvencijske stope).
Therefore, they reflect the situation found during that investigation with respect to those companies.
Kao posljedica toga, povrat plaćene pristojbe može se odobriti samo ako se dokaže da je ta pristojba veća od stvarne subvencijske stope i odgovarajuće dampinške marže.
Those duty rates (as opposed to the country-wide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC and produced by those companies and thus by the specific legal entities mentioned.
Stoga se u ispitnim postupcima za povrat na temelju članka 21.
Imported products concerned produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation with its name and address, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from those rates and shall be subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1037 treba uzeti u obzir i posebna situacija proizvođača izvoznika u odnosu na stvarnu dampinšku maržu koja je prevladavala tijekom razdoblja ispitnog postupka za povrat.
Any claim requesting the application of those individual company anti-dumping duty rates (e.g. following a change in the name of the entity or following the setting up of new production or sales entities) should be addressed to the Commission with all relevant information, in particular any modification in the company's activities linked to production, domestic and export sales associated with, for example, that name change or that change in the production and sales entities.
Ako se izvoz jednog od društava na koje se primjenjuje pojedinačna stopa antidampinške pristojbe nakon uvođenja predmetnih mjera opsegom znatno poveća, takvo povećanje obujma moglo bi se samo po sebi smatrati promjenom strukture trgovine zbog uvođenja mjera u smislu članka 13. stavka 1. osnovne uredbe.
If appropriate, this Regulation will accordingly be amended by updating the list of companies benefiting from individual anti-dumping duty rates.
U tim okolnostima i pod uvjetom da su ispunjeni uvjeti moguće je započinjanje postupka za sprečavanje izbjegavanja mjera.
In cases where the countervailing duty has been subtracted from the anti-dumping duty in order to avoid double-counting, the collection of the countervailing duty aims at offsetting both the effects of the countervailable subsidy and the dumping margin (up to the level of the subsidy rate).
Tim ispitnim postupkom može se, među ostalim, ispitati potreba ukidanja pojedinačne stope pristojbe i kasnije uvođenje stope koja se primjenjuje na području cijele zemlje.
As a consequence, a refund of duty paid can only be granted if it is shown that such duty exceeds the actual subsidy rate and the corresponding dumping margin.
Kako bi se smanjio rizik od izbjegavanja mjera zbog velike razlike u stopama pristojbi, potrebne su posebne mjere za osiguravanje primjene pojedinačnih antidampinških pristojbi.