natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In contrast, both the ASCM Agreement and the basic Regulation are silent about the method how to assess the relationship between exporting producers for the purpose of establishing the amount of subsidisation.
Provedbene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 o Carinskom zakoniku Unije („Carinski zakonik Unije”) za izračun ponderiranog prosječnog iznosa subvencioniranja za povezana društva.
In order to ensure that measures can be enforced effectively, particularly to avoid channelling exports through a related company with the lowest duty, it is the Commission's practice to establish the relationship between exporting producers through the criteria laid down in Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 of 24 November 2015.
Umjesto toga društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. uputilo je na definiciju iz članka 16.
This was clearly communicated to all parties in the Notice of initiation at the start of the proceeding.
Sporazuma o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama, prema kojem jedno društvo mora kontrolirati drugo društvo da bi ona bila povezana.
In addition, reference to Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementation Act is explicitly contained in Article 2(1) of the basic Anti-dumping Regulation and the Commission should have the same treatment of parties in both anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases.
Zatim je tvrdilo da se prema toj normi društvo Pirelly Tyre Co. Ltd. ne može smatrati povezanim društvom jer ga navodno ne kontrolira CNRC.
CNRC is the largest shareholder of Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd During the investigation period, it owned 65 % of the shares.
Komisija je podsjetila na članak 16.
As of today, it still holds 46 % of the shares.
Sporazuma o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama koji odgovara članku 9. stavku 2. osnovne uredbe.
Therefore, in the context of this investigation, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd and CNRC are considered to be related.
Međutim, u oba se članka upućuje samo na definiciju industrije Unije i odnos proizvođača iz Unije i proizvođača izvoznika.
The claim was thus rejected.
U tom se kontekstu proizvođač iz Unije može izuzeti iz definicije industrije Unije ako ga kontrolira proizvođač izvoznik.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd also commented that it should be considered only as a cooperating party, and not as an exporting producer, since the company stopped the production of the product concerned in November 2017.
Nasuprot tome, ni u Sporazumu o subvencijama i kompenzacijskim mjerama ni u osnovnoj uredbi ne spominje se način ocjenjivanja odnosa među proizvođačima izvoznicima za potrebe utvrđivanja iznosa subvencioniranja.
The Commission established that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd was an exporting producer during the entire investigation period.
Kako bi se osigurala djelotvorna provedba mjera, a posebno kako bi se izbjeglo preusmjeravanje izvoza preko povezanog društva s najnižom pristojbom, Komisija u svojoj praksi utvrđuje odnos među proizvođačima izvoznicima na temelju kriterija iz članka 127.
The fact that subsequently the company ceased the production does not alter the result of the investigation.
Provedene uredbe (EU) 2015/2447 od 24. studenoga 2015. o Carinskom zakoniku Unije.
The claim was therefore rejected.
To je nedvosmisleno priopćeno svim strankama u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka na njegovu početku.
Following final disclosure Pirelli reiterated its claim that it functions independently from the China National Tire Group.
Osim toga, upućivanje na članak 127.
However, none of the claims was substantiated with additional evidence.
Provedbene uredbe o Carinskom zakoniku Unije izričito je sadržano u članku 2. stavku 1. osnovne antidampinške uredbe i Komisija bi trebala postupati na isti način sa strankama u antidampinškim predmetima i strankama u antisubvencijskim predmetima.
In particular, Pirelli did not contest the ownership structure described by the Commission in annex 2 of its final disclosure.
Trenutačno i dalje drži 46 % dionica.
Therefore the Commission rejected this claim.
Stoga se u kontekstu ovog ispitnog postupka smatra da su društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. i CNRC međusobno povezani.
The Commission continued seeking and verifying all information it deemed necessary for its definitive findings.
Stoga je tvrdnja odbačena.
Given that the injury period and the investigation period are the same as in the parallel anti-dumping investigation, the Commission informed, on 1 June 2018, interested parties that the information and comments submitted concerning injury in the framework of the anti-dumping investigation were also going to be taken into account for this investigation.
Društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. dostavilo je i primjedbu da bi se ono trebalo smatrati samo stranom koja surađuje, a ne proizvođačem izvoznikom, s obzirom na to da je društvo prestalo s proizvodnjom predmetnog proizvoda u studenome 2017.
None of the parties opposed to this approach.
Komisija je utvrdila da je društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. bilo proizvođač izvoznik tijekom cijelog razdoblja ispitnog postupka.
In the parallel anti-dumping investigation parties received, on 24 July 2018, final disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Činjenica da je društvo kasnije prestalo s proizvodnjom ne mijenja rezultate ispitnog postupka.
Furthermore interested parties received an additional disclosure on 10 September 2018.
Stoga je tvrdnja odbačena.
As described in recital (60) above the comments submitted in the framework of those disclosures were in so far they concerned injury, causation and Union interest fully considered in this investigation and, where appropriate, taken into account and reflected in the findings of this investigation.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Pirelli ponovilo je svoju tvrdnju da djeluje neovisno o Grupi China National Tire.
Final disclosure
Međutim, nijedna tvrdnja nije potkrijepljena dodatnim dokazima.
On 28 September 2018, the Commission informed all parties of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it intended to impose a definitive anti-subsidy duty on imports of the product concerned into the Union.
Konkretno, društvo Pirelli nije osporilo vlasničku strukturu koju je Komisija opisala u Prilogu 2. konačnoj objavi.
All parties were granted a period within which they could make comments on the final disclosure (i.e. 8 October 2018).
Stoga je Komisija odbacila tu tvrdnju.
Several interested parties requested an extension of the deadline.
Komisija je nastavila prikupljati i provjeravati sve informacije koje je smatrala potrebnima za donošenje svojih konačnih nalaza.
The Commission granted until 10 October 2018 10AM for submitting comments to those parties.
S obzirom na to da su razdoblje štete i razdoblje ispitnog postupka jednaki kao u usporednom antidampinškom ispitnom postupku Komisija je 1. lipnja 2018. obavijestila zainteresirane strane da će informacije i primjedbe o šteti dostavljene u okviru antidampinškog ispitnog postupka uzeti u obzir i u ovom ispitnom postupku.
The CCCMC, the CRIA, three out of the four sampled Chinese exporting producers, two unrelated importers made written submissions commenting on the final disclosure.
Nijedna se strana nije protivila tom pristupu.
Following final disclosure, the China National Tire Group claimed its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission when it rejected its request for further extension of the deadline provided for submission of comments on the final disclosure.
Sve stranke u usporednom antidampinškom ispitnom postupku primile su 24. srpnja 2018. konačnu objavnu o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih Komisija namjerava uvesti konačnu antidampinšku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
According to it, the Commission should not view the ten-day period as a fixed time limit.
Nadalje, 10. rujna 2018. zainteresirane strane primile su dodatnu objavu.
Furthermore, when setting out the deadline, the Commission should consider the peculiarities of the case at hand and allow sufficient time for both written and oral submissions.
Kako je prethodno opisano u uvodnoj izjavi 60., primjedbe o šteti, uzročnosti i interesu Unije dostavljene nakon tih objava u cijelosti su razmotrene u ovom ispitnom postupku te su, prema potrebi, uzete u obzir u nalazima ovog ispitnog postupka.
In respect of these claims, the Commission noted that it had fully complied with the minimum deadline of 10 days set in Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation for comments on final disclosure.
Konačna objava
Furthermore, it also granted an extension to all interested parties in the proceeding who requested so taking into account the urgency of the matter in accordance with the same Article.
Komisija je 28. rujna 2018. sve stranke obavijestila o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih namjerava uvesti konačnu antisubvencijsku pristojbu na uvoz predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
Hämmerling requested a hearing with the Hearing Officer to raise legal concerns related to the current investigation and certain horizontal issues concerning data protection of confidential and non-confidential information as included in the TRON TDI database and the current practice of granting access to the non-confidential files to interested parties outside the territory of the Union through that database.
Svim je strankama odobreno razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle podnijeti primjedbe na konačnu objavu (8. listopada 2018.).
The Commission observed that the EU institutions are not legally bound by the General Data Protection Regulation but by Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih strana zatražilo je produljenje roka.
Moreover, Hämmerling confirmed that the personal data protection issue was not directly linked to a possible specific hampering of its rights of defence under trade defence law.
Komisija je to odobrila i rok za dostavu primjedbi produljen je do 10. listopada 2018. u 10 sati.
The Commission therefore concluded that Hämmerling's status as interested party in the proceeding and its rights of defence were not directly affected.
Primjedbe o konačnoj objavi dostavili su CCCMC, CRIA, tri od četiri kineska proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku i dva nepovezana uvoznika.
After final disclosure, Hämmerling reiterated its claim that ‘the right to personal data protection is an independent right, where threshold for its violation does not require an actual example, but the mere possibility of being misused in inappropriate manner, such as making it available to unverified users of database in third-countries with no adequate assessment of their observance of data protection law’.
Nakon konačne objave Grupa China National Tire tvrdila je da je Komisija povrijedila njezino pravo na obranu odbacivši njezin zahtjev za dodatno produljenje roka za podnošenje primjedbi na konačnu objavu.
In relation to this claim, the Commission referred to Article 9(6) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 that allows the Commission to transfer personal data if the transfer is necessary or legally required for the defence of legal claims, and the fact that all data subjects have to sign the TRON terms of use (that stipulates amongst other that there can be no unauthorized release of any information from TRON) when entering into TRON for the first time when they were granted interested party access to a case.
Njezino je mišljenje da Komisija ne bi trebala desetodnevno razdoblje smatrati fiksnim rokom.
It considered therefore that the use of TRON is compliant with the applicable data protection rules.
Nadalje, pri utvrđivanju roka Komisija bi trebala uzeti u obzir posebnosti predmeta te osigurati dovoljno vremena za pisane podneske i usmeno očitovanje.
Following final disclosure the Giti Group requested a hearing with Hearing Officer claiming that its rights of defence have been breached by the Commission as it included the duty drawback scheme very late in the proceeding and it arrived to wrong conclusions.
U pogledu tih tvrdnji Komisija je napomenula da je u potpunosti poštovala minimalni rok od 10 dana za dostavu primjedbi o konačnoj objavi, koji je utvrđen u članku 30. stavku 5. osnovne uredbe.
The Hearing Officer took the view that the Notice of Initiation allowed for covering the scheme under discussion.
Osim toga, odobrila je njegovo produljenje svim zainteresiranim stranama u postupku koje su to zatražile uzimajući u obzir hitnost predmeta u skladu s istim člankom.
Furthermore, the Giti Group should have been aware that this scheme is covered by the proceeding and had sufficient time to present all their comments to the Commission.
Društvo Hämmerling zatražilo je saslušanje kod službenika za saslušanje o pravnim pitanjima povezanima s tekućim ispitnim postupkom i određenim horizontalnim pitanjima o zaštiti povjerljivih podataka i podataka koji nisu povjerljivi uključenih u bazu podataka TRON TDI i trenutačnoj praksi odobravanja pristupa spisima koji nisu povjerljivi zainteresiranim stranama izvan područja Unije s pomoću te baze podataka.
The Hearing Officer concluded that the rights of defence of the Giti Group were respected.
Komisija je primijetila da institucije EU-a nisu pravno obvezane Općom uredbom o zaštiti podataka, nego Uredbom 45/2001.
Several other interested parties reiterated the same concerns as expressed after the information document and asked the Commission to make further clarifications.
Osim toga, društvo Hämmerling potvrdilo je da pitanje zaštite osobnih podataka nije izravno povezano s mogućim konkretnim preprekama ostvarivanju njegova prava na obranu u skladu sa zakonodavstvom o trgovinskoj zaštiti.
The Commission considered that the open file, the Information Document and the Final Disclosure contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence.
Komisija je stoga zaključila da položaj društva Hämmerling kao zainteresirane strane u postupku i njegovo pravo na obranu nisu izravno narušeni.
Moreover, a note for the file providing clarifications on the Information Document was included in the open file before final disclosure.
Nakon konačne objave društvo Hämmerling ponovilo je svoju tvrdnju da je „pravo na zaštitu osobnih podataka neovisno pravo te da nije potreban stvaran primjer njegova kršenja, nego je dovoljna samo mogućnost zlouporabe, kao što je stavljanje na raspolaganje tih podataka neprovjerenim korisnicima baze podataka u trećim zemljama, bez odgovarajuće procjene njihova poštovanja zakona o zaštiti podataka.”
It therefore rejected the request to provide further clarifications.
U vezi s tom tvrdnjom Komisija upućuje na članak 9. stavak 6.
Finally, the parties claimed that their rights of defence were seriously affected as the period for commenting on the final disclosure was too short even with the extension and did not take into consideration the peculiarities of this investigation.
Uredbe 45/2001 koji joj omogućuje prijenos osobnih podataka ako je on potreban ili pravno obvezan za obranu pravnih zahtjeva te na činjenicu da sve osobe na koje se podaci odnose, pri prvom ulasku u bazu podataka TRON nakon što im se odobri pristup određenom predmetu, moraju pristati na uvjete uporabe TRON-a (kojima se, među ostalim, zabranjuje neovlašteno širenje informacija iz TRON-a).
Regarding the set deadline the Commission reiterated that it had complied with the legal deadline under Article 30(5) of the basic Regulation, as further explained in recital (65) above.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da je uporaba TRON-a u skladu s primjenjivim pravilima o zaštiti podataka.
It added that the parties had received an extensive disclosure by means of the Information Document in July 2018 which already set out the main considerations and conclusions for all subsidies with the exception of excess remission of natural rubber and electricity provided for less than adequate remuneration.
Nakon konačne objave Grupa Giti zatražila je saslušanje pred službenikom za saslušanje tvrdeći da je Komisija povrijedila njezino pravo na obranu jer je program povrata uvoznih naknada u postupak uključila vrlo kasno i zato došla do pogrešnih zaključaka.
At that stage parties were granted a deadline of 25 days to submit comments.
Službenik za saslušanja smatrao je da je u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka taj program obuhvaćen.
As most of the issues were therefore known to all parties, the comments received upon final disclosure were also substantial, ranging from 8 to 63 pages.
Nadalje, Grupa Giti trebala je znati da je taj program obuhvaćen postupkom i imala je dovoljno vremena da sve svoje primjedbe dostavi Komisiji.
With respect to the injury aspect of this investigation, the Commission noted that parties received a final disclosure and an additional final disclosure document also in the context of the parallel anti-dumping investigation.
Stoga je službenik za saslušanja smatrao da se pravo Grupe Giti na obranu poštovala.
The present investigation addressed the comments received following the two disclosures.
Nekoliko drugih zainteresiranih strana ponovilo je nedoumice koje su već izražene nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama te je od Komisije zatražilo objašnjenje.
Therefore, the Commission considered that the open file and the disclosures already contained sufficient information allowing all interested parties to fully exercise their rights of defence within the deadline as set out in the definitive disclosure document.
Komisija je smatrala da u otvorenom spisu, dokumentu s informacijama i konačnoj objavi već postoji dovoljno informacija kojima se svim zainteresiranim stranama omogućuje da u potpunosti ostvare pravo na obranu.
For these reasons, the Commission took the view that the rights of defence of all interested parties were fully observed during this proceeding.
Nadalje, bilješka za spis u kojoj se nalaze pojašnjenja o dokumentu s informacijama uključena je u javni spis prije konačne objave.
PRODUCT CONCERNED AND LIKE PRODUCT
Stoga je odbacila zahtjev za dodatna objašnjenja.
Product concerned
Konačno, stranke su tvrdile da je njihovo pravo na obranu bilo ozbiljno ugroženo jer je razdoblje za dostavu primjedbi o konačnoj objavi bilo prekratko usprkos njegovu produljenju i jer nisu uzete u obzir posebnosti ovog ispitnog postupka.
The product concerned is certain pneumatic tyres, new or retreaded, of rubber, of a kind used for buses or lorries, with a load index exceeding 121 originating in the PRC, currently falling within CN codes 40112090 and ex40121200 (TARIC code 4012120010).
U pogledu utvrđenog roka Komisija je ponovila da je poštovala zakonski rok u skladu iz članka 30. stavka 5. osnovne uredbe, kako je dodatno objašnjeno u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 65.
These CN and TARIC codes are given for information only.
Dodala je da su stranke u srpnju 2018. zaprimile brojne informacije u dokumentu s informacijama, u kojem su već izneseni glavni aspekti i zaključci za sve subvencije, uz iznimku pretjeranog otpusta carina za prirodni kaučuk i električne energije koja se prodavala po cijeni manjoj od primjerene.
The product concerned covers both new and retreaded pneumatic tyres for buses or lorries which share the same essential physical, chemical and technical characteristics.
U toj su fazi stranke dobile rok od 25 dana za dostavu primjedbi.
Both types of the product concerned are made of the same input (even if the technology involved may differ) and have a similar structure.
Budući da su sve stranke već bile upoznate s većinom tih pitanja, nakon konačne objave zaprimljene su i opsežne primjedbe (u rasponu od 8 do 63 stranica).
The variance in raw materials and structure impart different performance characteristics.
U pogledu aspekta štete ovog ispitnog postupka Komisija je napomenula da su stranke primile konačnu objavu i dodatni dokument o konačnoj objavi i u okviru usporednog antidampinškog ispitnog postupka.
Manufacturing process
U ovom je ispitnom postupku odgovoreno na primjedbe primljene nakon tih dviju objava.
New tyres
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da su otvoreni spis i objave već sadržavali dovoljno informacija da se svim zainteresiranim stranama omogući potpuno ostvarenje prava na obranu u roku utvrđenom u dokumentu o konačnoj objavi.
The manufacturing process of the new lorry and bus tyres involves: (1) compounding and mixing rubber; (2) tyre components preparation; (3) (green) tyre building; (4) curing (vulcanisation); and (5) final inspection.
Zato je Komisija smatrala da je pravo na obranu svih zainteresiranih strana tijekom ovog postupka bilo u potpunosti poštovano.
All lorry and bus tyres are made from the same basic raw materials, namely natural rubber, synthetic rubber, steel, carbon black, other chemicals and oils as well as fabric and have the same components, namely tread belt, sidewall, inner casing, bead wires, steel belts, casing cords, even if a certain variance is found between the various producers of this product.
PREDMETNI PROIZVOD I ISTOVJETNI PROIZVOD
The manufacturing process of the new lorry and bus tyres was also found to involve varying technologies, which, however, did not impact on the overall findings of interchangeability.
Predmetni proizvod
Retreaded tyres
Predmetni proizvod čine određene pneumatske gume, nove ili protektirane, od kaučuka, vrste koja se rabi za autobuse ili kamione, s indeksom opterećenja većim od 121, podrijetlom iz NRK-a, trenutačno razvrstane u oznake KN 40112090 i ex40121200 (oznaka TARIC 4012120010).
Retreading is essentially a recycling process whereby worn tyres are refurbished through a replacement of the tread on an old casing.
Te oznake KN i TARIC imaju samo informativnu svrhu.
Casings are main elements of the retreading process, and, as such a substantial part of the retreader activity is the selection and acquisition of casings suitable for retreading.
Predmetni proizvod obuhvaća nove i protektirane pneumatske gume za autobuse ili kamione koje imaju jednaka bitna fizička, kemijska i tehnička svojstva.
Casings are thereby the main input of the production process and constitute — depending of their quality — either a real ‘semi-finished’ product or a waste.
Obje vrste predmetnog proizvoda izrađuju se od istih ulaznih materijala (čak i ako se upotrijebljena tehnologija razlikuje) i imaju sličnu strukturu.
Again, this process can involve varying technologies without impact on the Commission's interchangeability findings.
Zbog razlika u sirovinama i strukturi različite su značajke učinkovitosti.
Uses and types of tyres
Postupak proizvodnje
Lorry and bus tyres are produced in a large variety of types and sizes found on a wide range of commercial vehicles, from local delivery lorries and buses in urban or regional settings to the long haul lorries and buses according to their size and load index specifications.
Nove gume
They are neither suitable for use on passenger vehicles or on other light commercial vehicles nor for fully off-the-road vehicles such as agricultural tractors.
Postupak proizvodnje novih guma za kamione i autobuse uključuje: 1. pripremu i miješanje kaučuka; 2. pripremu komponenti gume; 3. (zelenu) proizvodnju gume; 4. vulkanizaciju; i 5. završnu kontrolu.
Tyres for lorries or buses are sold in two types and four categories.
Sve gume za kamione i autobuse izrađuju se od istih osnovnih sirovina, odnosno prirodnog kaučuka, sintetičkog kaučuka, čelika, ugljene čađe, drugih kemikalija i ulja te tekstila i imaju iste komponente, odnosno gazni sloj, bok gume, unutarnji plašt, žičani obruč u stopi, čelični pojas i kordne niti na plaštu, čak i ako postoje određene razlike među proizvođačima tog proizvoda.
Tube type tyre is a more traditional option; it has an inner tube, which has its own valve, placed inside the tyre.
Utvrđeno je da su u postupak proizvodnje novih guma za kamione i autobuse uključene različite tehnologije, ali one nisu utjecale na ukupne nalaze međusobne zamjenjivosti.
In a tubeless tire, the tire and the rim of the wheel form an airtight seal, with the valve being directly mounted on the rim.
Protektirane gume
An overwhelming majority of tyres for lorries or buses sold in the Union are tubeless tyres.
Protektiranje je zapravo postupak recikliranja u kojem se istrošene gume obnavljaju zamjenom gaznog sloja na starom plaštu.