natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission therefore concluded that the imposition of countervailing duties would be in the interest of the Union industry.
Kako bi se utvrdila razina mjera, Komisija je najprije utvrdila iznos pristojbe koji je potreban kako bi se uklonila prijetnja štete koju bi pretrpjela industrija Unije.
Interest of unrelated importers
Pri izračunu razine uklanjanja štete Komisija je smatrala da bi ta razina trebala omogućiti industriji Unije da pokrije svoje troškove proizvodnje i ostvari dobit prije oporezivanja od prodaje istovjetnog proizvoda u Uniji kakvu bi razumno mogla postići industrija te vrste u sektoru u uobičajenim uvjetima tržišnog natjecanja, odnosno u uvjetima bez subvencioniranog uvoza.
As referred to in recital (30), only one unrelated importer, Gunvor International BV, replied to the questionnaire sent by the Commission.
Razina uklanjanja štete izračunana je na temelju usporedbe ponderirane prosječne cijene subvencioniranog uvoza, kako je utvrđeno za potrebe izračuna sniženja cijene u uvodnoj izjavi 354., s neštetnom cijenom industrije Unije za istovjetni proizvod.
In its reply, the importer submits that it is against the imposition of measures and that the situation of the Union industry is caused by an inefficient production system and management.
Neštetna cijena utvrđena je dodavanjem opravdane razine dobiti trošku proizvodnje.
The Commission observes that importers of biodiesel are very often traders on the Union market that not only do import, but also trade with biodiesel purchased from Union producers.
Ciljna profitna marža određena je na 11 %, odnosno na razinu koju je Komisija primijenila u prethodnom ispitnom postupku s mjerama uvedenima 26. studenoga 2013.
However, the Union producers, especially the larger ones, rely to a significant extent on their own distribution channels.
Nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama CARBIO je tvrdio da bi ciljna dobit trebala biti dobit iz razdoblja od 2015. do rujna 2017., a ne ciljna dobit od 11 % upotrijebljena u prethodnom ispitnom postupku.
The Commission therefore does not expect the importers would be able to fully replace the level of imports affected by measures with biodiesel purchased from Union producers.
CARBIO je tu tvrdnju ponovio nakon konačne objave.
The possible negative effect on importers can however partially be balanced by the increased volume of trade of biodiesel purchased from the Union industry.
Komisija je ciljnu dobit iz prethodnog ispitnog postupka upotrijebila jer je, bez obzira na to je li šteta utvrđena ili ne, Komisija primijetila da se industrija Unije, kako se čini, nije potpuno oporavila od učinaka prethodnog dampinga pa razine dobiti ostvarene tijekom razmatranog razdoblja nisu reprezentativne.
Interest of users/consumers
U tom pogledu Komisija i dalje smatra da je dobit upotrijebljena u prethodnom ispitnom postupku primjerena i prevladavajuća u situaciji niskog obujma subvencioniranog uvoza.
Producers of diesel fuel, that is refineries, purchase the biodiesel, imported or produced by Union industry.
Razina uklanjanja štete za „ostala društva koja surađuju” i za „sva ostala društva” utvrđuje se na isti način kao stope subvencije za ta društva iz uvodne izjave 304.
Due to legal requirement, refineries need to add biodiesel to the fossil fuel sold on the market.
Retroaktivno uvođenje kompenzacijskih pristojbi
In this regard it is the final consumer that would be affected by the price increase following imposition of measures.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 10., Komisija je Uredbom o evidentiranju uvoz predmetnog proizvoda podrijetlom iz Argentine uvjetovala evidentiranjem s obzirom na moguću retroaktivnu primjenu svih kompenzacijskih mjera u skladu s člankom 24. stavkom 5. osnovne uredbe.
The price of fossil fuels is, with rare exemptions, lower than price of biodiesel, but given its content of normally no more than 10 %, the negative effect of price increase of biodiesel is only partially passed on to the consumer.
U skladu s člankom 16. stavkom 4. osnovne uredbe pristojbe se mogu retroaktivno uvesti „za proizvode koji su ušli u potrošnju najviše 90 dana prije datuma primjene privremenih mjera”.
The Commission found that the imposition of duties would have the negative effect of increasing consumer prices.
Komisija primjećuje da u ovom predmetu nisu uvedene nikakve privremene mjere.
However, because of the limited content of biodiesel in the final product purchased by consumers (typically less than 10 %), this negative effect on the price of diesel fuel would only be a small proportion compared to the direct change in the price of biodiesel on the Union market.
Na temelju toga Komisija smatra da jedan od pravnih uvjeta iz članka 16. stavka 4. osnovne uredbe nije ispunjen pa ne bi trebalo retroaktivno uvesti pristojbe na evidentirani uvoz.
Following the disclosure of the information document the EBB stated that the Commission has acted inconsistently with its obligations by finding it was unable to conclude on Union interest despite the lack of any compelling reasons showing that the imposition of measures would be against Union interest.
Nakon konačne objave EBB je naveo da bi pristojbe trebalo retroaktivno naplatiti na evidentirani uvoz jer su ispunjena četiri uvjeta za retroaktivnu naplatu pristojbi na temelju članka 16. stavka 4. osnovne uredbe.
The Commission in its information document found it imperative to examine the effects of changes that took place shortly before issuing the information document and happened after the end of the investigation period.
Konkretno, EBB je naveo da bi u ovom slučaju trebalo primijeniti drugi dio članka 16. stavka 4., „ne prije pokretanja ispitnog postupka”, jer bi ga trebalo tumačiti odvojeno od teksta „najviše 90 dana prije datuma primjene privremenih mjera”.
The EBB further commented that the Commission failed to clearly state the reasons on which its ultimate finding was based that it remained unclear as to whether the imposition of measures would be in the interest in the Union.
U članku 16. stavku 4. osnovne uredbe utvrđeno je da se pristojbe se mogu retroaktivno naplatiti samo „za proizvode koji su ušli u potrošnju najviše 90 dana prije datuma primjene privremenih mjera, ali ne prije pokretanja ispitnog postupka”.
The Commission, as explained in recital (489), found it imperative to further examine additional information with regard to Union interest and this was the reason for the decision of not imposing provisional measures.
Drugi dio članka 16. stavka 4., „ne prije pokretanja ispitnog postupka”, ne može se tumačiti odvojeno od ostatka teksta tog članka jer se u tom članku to ne dopušta.
The Commission examined all additional information obtained following the disclosure of the information document, that included in particular, but was not limited to, the replies to additional questionnaires received from the EBB and the sampled Union producers, statistics on biodiesel imports to the Union after the investigation period and other data provided by interested parties following the disclosure of the information document.
Stoga u nedostatku privremenih pristojbi koje su, ako su na snazi, retroaktivna primjena konačnih pristojbi, kako je utvrđeno u uvodnoj izjavi 502., Komisija smatra da pravni uvjeti iz članka 16. stavka 4. osnovne uredbe nisu ispunjeni i da stoga ne bi trebalo retroaktivno uvesti pristojbe na evidentirani uvoz.
On the basis of the examination of this additional information, and further evidence of injury suffered by the Union industry, such as negative impact on profitability and a substantial reduction of production explained in recitals (366)(363) and (473), the Commission concluded that there are no compelling reasons under Article 31 of the basic Regulation that it would not be in the interest of the Union to impose measures.
Konačne mjere
DEFINITIVE COUNTERVAILING MEASURES
S obzirom na prethodno navedeno i u skladu s člankom 15. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe, trebalo bi uvesti konačnu kompenzacijsku pristojbu na razini koja je dovoljna da se ukloni prijetnja štete prouzročena subvencioniranim uvozom, a da ne premašuje utvrđeni iznos subvencioniranja.
On the basis of the conclusions reached by the Commission on subsidy, threat of injury, causation and Union interest, a definitive countervailing duty should be imposed to prevent the materialisation of the imminent threat of material injury caused to the Union industry by the subsidised imports.
S obzirom na visoku stopu suradnje argentinskih proizvođača izvoznika pristojba za „sva ostala društva” bila je utvrđena na razini najviše pristojbe koja će se uvesti društvima u uzorku.
Injury elimination level
Pristojba za „sva ostala društva” primjenjivat će se na ona društva koja nisu surađivala u ovom ispitnom postupku.
To determine the level of the measures, the Commission first established the amount of duty necessary to eliminate the threat of injury suffered by the Union industry.
Za ostale argentinske proizvođače izvoznike koji surađuju iz tablice 24., a nisu u uzorku, konačna stopa pristojbe određena je na razini ponderiranih prosječnih stopa utvrđenih za proizvođače izvoznike u uzorku koji surađuju.
When calculating the injury elimination level the Commission considered that this level should allow the Union industry to cover its costs of production and obtain a profit before tax that could be reasonably achieved by an industry of this type in the sector under normal conditions of competition, i.e. in the absence of subsidised imports, on sales of the like product in the Union.
Na temelju toga konačne stope pristojbe koje treba uvesti određene su kako slijedi:
The injury elimination level was calculated on the basis of a comparison of the weighted average price of the subsidised imports, as established for the price undercutting calculations in recital (354), and the non-injurious price of the Union industry for the like product.
Tablica 24.
The non-injurious price was established by adding to the cost of production a reasonable profit level.
Konačna kompenzacijska pristojba
The target profit margin was set at 11 %, that is the level used by the Commission in its previous investigation with measures imposed on 26 November 2013.
Društvo/grupa
Following the disclosure of the information document CARBIO argued that the target profit should be the profit from the period between 2015 and September 2017 and not the 11 % target profit used in the previous investigation.
Iznos subvencioniranja
CARBIO reiterated this claim following final disclosure.
Stopa kompenzacijske pristojbe
The Commission used the target profit of the previous investigation, because, irrespective of establishing injury or not, the Commission observed that the Union industry appears not to have fully recovered from the effects of past dumping, and therefore the profit levels reached during the period considered are not representative.
Ostala društva koja surađuju – COFCO Argentina SA i Cargill SACI
In this respect, the Commission still considers the profit used in its previous investigation as appropriate and prevailing in a situation of low volumes of subsidised imports.
Pojedinačne stope kompenzacijske pristojbe određene u ovoj Uredbi utvrđene su na temelju nalaza ovog ispitnog postupka.
The injury elimination level for ‘other cooperating companies’ and for ‘all other companies’ is defined in the same manner as the subsidy rates for these companies in recital (304).
Pojedinačne stope kompenzacijske pristojbe stoga odražavaju stanje utvrđeno tijekom ovog ispitnog postupka u odnosu na predmetna društva.
Retroactive imposition of countervailing duties
Navedene pojedinačne stope pristojbe (za razliku od pristojbe na području cijele zemlje koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”) primjenjuju se tako isključivo na uvoz proizvoda podrijetlom iz predmetne zemlje koje proizvode predmetna društva.
As stated in recital (10), the Commission made imports of the product concerned originating in Argentina subject to registration by the registration Regulation in view of the possible retroactive application of any countervailing measures under Article 24(5) the basic Regulation.
Uvezeni proizvodi koje proizvodi neko drugo društvo koje se posebno ne spominje u izvršnom dijelu ove Uredbe, uključujući subjekte povezane s onima koji se posebno spominju, ne mogu imati koristi od tih stopa i podliježu stopi pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na „sva ostala društva”.
Pursuant to Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation, duties may be levied retroactively ‘on products which were entered for consumption no more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures’.
Društvo može zatražiti daljnju primjenu tih pojedinačnih stopa pristojbe čak i ako poslije promijeni svoj naziv ili naziv jednog od svojih subjekata.
The Commission observes that no provisional measures were imposed in this case.
Zahtjev se mora uputiti Komisiji.
On that basis, the Commission considers that one of the legal conditions under Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation is not met and therefore the duties should not be levied retroactively on the registered imports.
Zahtjev mora sadržavati sve relevantne informacije kojima je moguće dokazati da ta promjena ne utječe na pravo društva da ostvaruje koristi od pojedinačne stope pristojbe koja se na njega primjenjuje.
Following final disclosure, the EBB stated that the duties should be levied retroactively on the registered imports, as the four conditions for the retroactive collection of duties under Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation are met.
Ako promjena naziva tog društva ne utječe na njegovo pravo da ostvaruje koristi od stope pristojbe koja se na njega primjenjuje, obavijest o promjeni naziva objavit će se u Službenom listu Europske unije.
In particular, EBB stated that the second part of Article 16(4) referring to ‘not prior to the initiation of the investigation’ should be applied in the case at hand as it should be read separately from the text ‘no more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures’.
Ako zbog događaja nakon razdoblja ispitnog postupka dođe do trajne promjene okolnosti, mogu se poduzeti odgovarajuće mjere u skladu s člankom 19. osnovne antisubvencijske uredbe.
Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation sets out that duties may be levied retroactively only ‘on products which were entered for consumption no more than 90 days prior to the date of application of provisional measures but not prior to the initiation of the investigation’.
Uzimajući u obzir sudsku praksu Suda, primjereno je predvidjeti stopu zatezne kamate koja će se platiti u slučaju povrata konačnih pristojbi jer se u relevantnim odredbama na snazi u pogledu carinskih pristojbi ne predviđa ta kamatna stopa i jer bi primjena nacionalnih pravila dovela do neopravdanih narušavanja odnosa među gospodarskim subjektima, ovisno o tome koja je država članica odabrana za carinjenje.
The second part of Article 16(4) referring to ‘not prior to the initiation of the investigation’ cannot be read separately from the rest of the text of that Article as the Article does not allow for that.
OBJAVA
Consequently, in the absence of provisional duties, which, if in place, are a retroactive application of definitive duties, as set out in recital (502), the Commission considers that the legal conditions under Article 16(4) of the basic Regulation are not met and therefore the duties should not be levied retroactively on the registered imports.
Zainteresirane strane bile su obaviještene o bitnim činjenicama i razmatranjima na temelju kojih se namjeravalo preporučiti uvođenje konačne kompenzacijske pristojbe na uvoz biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine.
Definitive measures
Zainteresiranim stranama dano je i razdoblje unutar kojeg su mogle podnijeti prigovore nakon te objave.
In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 15(1) of the basic Regulation, a definitive countervailing duty should be imposed at a level sufficient to eliminate the threat of injury caused by the subsidised imports without exceeding the amount of subsidisation found.
Primjedbe koje su zainteresirane strane dostavile propisno su razmotrene te su, prema potrebi, nalazi na odgovarajući način promijenjeni.
Given the high rate of cooperation of Argentinian exporting producers, the ‘all other companies’ duty was set at the level of the highest duty imposed on the sampled companies.
OBLIK MJERA
The ‘all other companies’ duty will be applied to those companies which did not cooperate in this investigation.
Nakon konačne objave osam proizvođača izvoznika koji surađuju, uključujući njihova povezana društva u Urugvaju i Švicarskoj, i CARBIO ponudili su preuzimanje obveza u vezi s cijenama u skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 1. osnovne uredbe.
For the other cooperating non-sampled Argentinian exporting producers listed in Table 24, the definitive duty rate is set at the weighted average of the rates established for the cooperating exporting producers in the sample.
Komisija je prihvatila te ponude preuzimanja obveza Provedbenom odlukom (EU) 2019/245 jer smatra da se njima uklanjaju štetni učinci subvencioniranog uvoza i u dovoljnoj mjeri ograničava rizik od izbjegavanja mjera.
On that basis, the definitive duty rates to be imposed are set as follows:
Ako Komisija, u skladu s člankom 13. stavkom 9. osnovne uredbe, povuče odluku o prihvaćanju preuzete obveze zbog kršenja obveza upućivanjem na konkretne transakcije te proglasi odgovarajuće račune na temelju preuzete obveze nevaljanima, carinski dug nastaje u trenutku prihvaćanja deklaracije za puštanje tih transakcija u slobodni promet.
Table 24
Mjere predviđene ovom Uredbom u skladu su s mišljenjem Odbora osnovanog člankom 15. stavkom 1.
Definitive Countervailing Duty
Uredbe (EU) 2016/1036 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća,
Company/Group
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
Amount of subsidisation
Članak 1.
Countervailing duty rate
Uvodi se konačna kompenzacijska pristojba na uvoz monoalkilnih estera masnih kiselina i/ili parafinskih plinskih ulja dobivenih sintezom i/ili hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnog podrijetla, u čistom obliku ili u mješavini, trenutačno razvrstanih u oznake KN ex15162098 (oznake TARIC 1516209821, 1516209829 i 1516209830), ex15180091 (oznake TARIC 1518009121, 1518009129 i 1518009130), ex15180095 (oznaka TARIC 1518009510), ex15180099 (oznake TARIC 1518009921, 1518009929 i 1518009930), ex27101943 (oznake TARIC 2710194321, 2710194329 i 2710194330), ex27101946 (oznake TARIC 2710194621, 2710194629 i 2710194630), ex27101947 (oznake TARIC 2710194721, 2710194729 i 2710194730), 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992 (oznake TARIC 3824999210, 3824999212 i 3824999220), 38260010 i ex38260090 (oznake TARIC 3826009011, 3826009019 i 3826009030) podrijetlom iz Argentine.
Other cooperating companies — COFCO Argentina SA and Cargill SACI
Stope konačne kompenzacijske pristojbe koja se primjenjuje na neto cijenu franko granica Unije, neocarinjeno, za proizvod opisan u stavku 1. koji proizvode dolje navedena društva, iznose kako slijedi:
The individual company countervailing duty rates specified in this Regulation was established on the basis of the findings of this investigation.
Društvo
Therefore, individual countervailing duty rates reflect the situation found during this investigation with respect to the companies concerned.
Konačna kompenzacijska pristojba
Those individual duty rates (as opposed to the countrywide duty applicable to ‘all other companies’) are thus exclusively applicable to imports of products originating in the country concerned and produced by the companies concerned.
Dodatna oznaka TARIC
Imported products produced by any other company not specifically mentioned in the operative part of this Regulation, including entities related to those specifically mentioned, cannot benefit from those rates and are subject to the duty rate applicable to ‘all other companies’.
Aceitera General Deheza S.A.
A company may request the continued application of those individual duty rates despite subsequently changing its name or the name of one of its entities.
Bunge Argentina S.A.
The request must be addressed to the Commission.
LDC Argentina S.A.
The request must contain all the relevant information enabling to demonstrate that the change does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate which applies to it.
Molinos Agro S.A.
If the change of name of the company does not affect its right to benefit from the duty rate which applies to it, a notice informing about the change of name will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Oleaginosa Moreno Hermanos S.A.C.I.F. y A
Should developments after the investigation period lead to a change in circumstances of a lasting nature, appropriate action in accordance with Article 19 of the basic anti-subsidy regulation may be taken.
Vicentin S.A.I.C.
In view of the case-law of the Court of Justice, it is appropriate to provide for the rate of default interest to be paid in case of reimbursement of definitive duties, because the relevant provisions in force concerning customs duties do not provide for such an interest rate, and the application of national rules would lead to undue distortions between economic operators depending on which Member State is chosen for customs clearance.
COFCO International Argentina S.A.
DISCLOSURE
Cargill S.A.C.I.
Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of a definitive countervailing duty on imports of biodiesel, originating in Argentina.
Osim ako je drukčije određeno, primjenjuju se važeće odredbe o carinama.
Interested parties were also granted a period within which they could make representations subsequent to this disclosure.
Stopa zatezne kamate koja se plaća u slučaju povrata iz kojeg proizlazi pravo na zateznu kamatu jest stopa koju primjenjuje Europska središnja banka za svoje glavne operacije refinanciranja, objavljena u seriji C Službenog lista Europske Unije, koja je na snazi prvog kalendarskog dana u mjesecu dospijeća plaćanja, uvećana za jedan postotni bod.
The comments submitted by interested parties were duly considered, and, where appropriate, the findings have been modified accordingly.
Članak 2.
FORM OF THE MEASURES
Uvoz proizvoda prijavljenih za puštanje u slobodan promet izuzima se od kompenzacijske pristojbe uvedene člankom 1. pod uvjetom da su ih proizvela, isporučila i za njih račune izdala društva od kojih je Komisija prihvatila preuzimanje obveza i čiji su nazivi navedeni u Provedbenoj odluci (EU) 2019/245, kako je povremeno izmijenjena, te da su uvezeni u skladu s odredbama te provedbene odluke Komisije.
Following final disclosure, eight cooperating exporting producers, including their related companies in Uruguay and Switzerland, and together with CARBIO, offered price undertakings in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.
Uvoz iz stavka 1. izuzima se od kompenzacijske pristojbe ako:
The Commission accepted these undertaking offers by Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/245, as it considers that they eliminate the injurious effects of the subsidised imports and limit to a sufficient degree the risk of circumvention.
je takav uvoz popraćen računom na temelju preuzete obveze, odnosno trgovačkim računom koji sadržava barem podatke i izjavu propisane u Prilogu 1. ovoj Uredbi; i
Whenever the Commission withdraws, under Article 13(9) of the basic Regulation, its acceptance of an undertaking following a breach by referring to particular transactions and declares the relevant undertaking invoices as invalid, a customs debt shall be incurred at the time of acceptance of the declaration for release into free circulation of these transactions.
je takvom uvozu priložena potvrda o izvoznoj obvezi u skladu s Prilogom 2. ovoj Uredbi; i
The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council,
roba koja je prijavljena i predočena carinskim tijelima točno odgovara opisu na računu na temelju preuzete obveze.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Carinski dug nastaje u trenutku prihvaćanja prijave za puštanje u slobodan promet:
Article 1
ako se u pogledu uvoza opisanog u stavku 1. utvrdi da nije ispunjen jedan uvjet ili više njih iz tog stavka i stavka 2.; ili