natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the same vein, the Guidelines on State aid for Research, Development and Innovation (R & D&I) states that: ‘Where the same entity carries out activities of both economic and non-economic nature, the public funding of the non-economic activities will not fall under Article 61(1) of the EEA Agreement if the two kinds of activities and their costs, funding and revenues can be clearly separated so that cross-subsidisation of the economic activity is effectively avoided.
tellUs (Dokument br. 730560).
Evidence of due allocation of costs, funding and revenues can consist of annual financial statements of the relevant entity’ (paragraph 18, emphasis added).
Dodatne informacije podnositelja pritužbe.
These conditions are set out in the Transparency Directive (Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings (OJ L 318, 17.11.2006, p. 17)), incorporated into the EEA Agreement by Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 55/2007 of 8 June 2007 (OJ L 266, 11.10.2007, p. 15 and EEA Supplement No 48, 11.10.2007, p. 12).
Poruka elektroničke pošte podnositelja pritužbe od 13. siječnja 2015.
Reference is made to the graphic included in IN's letter dated 28 October 2013 (Document No 688215).
(Dokument br. 734800).
The Authority notes that the development costs were taken into account in the budget of IN for 2013, year in which the costs occurred.
Odgovor norveških tijela na poruku elektroničke pošte koju je 13. siječnja 2015. poslao podnositelj pritužbe, vidjeti prethodnu napomenu (Dokument br. 742759).
See further details in recitals 113 to 115.
Presude u predmetima Belgija protiv Komisije (Tubemeuse), C-142/87, EU:C:1990:125, t.
Attachment to IN's mail to the Authority dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
25., i France Télécom (Bouygues), T-425/04 RENV i T-444/04 RENV, EU:T:2015:450, t.
Attachment 2 to IN's mail dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
186.
Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720778).
Presude u predmetima Höfner i Elser protiv Macrotona, C-41/90, EU:C:2011:732, t.
A capitalised cost is recognised as part of a fixed asset on a company's balance sheet, rather than being charged to expense in the period incurred.
21. – 23., Pavlov i dr., C-180/98 do C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428, i predmet E-5/07 Private Barnehagers Landsforbund [2008.]
Consequently, a non-capitalised costs is an expense only for the year in which it takes place.
EFTA Ct.
A copy of the NRS 19 was sent to the Authority as Annex II to the letter dated 24 November 2014 (Document No 730560).
Rep., str. 62., t.
According to the case-law, a measure which is potentially accessible to all undertakings is not selective.
78.
See, inter alia, judgment in Germany v Commission, C-156/98, EU:C:2000:467, paragraph 22.
Presuda u predmetu Ministero dell'Economica e delle Finanze protiv Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, C-222/04, EU:C:2006:8, t.
The Authority notes that this methodology has been applied consistently to all the premium agreements since 2013, including the agreements concerning the two first pilot projects, i.e. VisitSØrlandet and VisitTrondheim.
108.
In Annex 4 to the reply to the opening decision (Document No 720779), IN provided the Authority with a copy of all the signed premium partnership agreements.
Presuda u predmetu Banco Exterior de España, C-37/92, EU:C:1993:836, t.
The hourly full cost model differs from the basic cost model, were some common costs can be deducted from total cost.
11.
This model has not been applied by IN in the framework of the partnership agreements.
Moguće je supostojanje gospodarskih i negospodarskih djelatnosti u okviru istog sektora, a ponekad ih može obavljati ista organizacija.
IN has explained that since the Guidelines for User payments from 2011, this model was put aside.
U tom scenariju subjekt treba smatrati poduzetnikom samo u pogledu njegovih gospodarskih djelatnosti.
The full cost methodology is used for all IN's services, if the same service can be provided by private actors (Document No 720775, reply to the opening decision).
Vidjeti presudu u predmetu Komisija protiv Italije, C–118/85, EU:C:1987:283, t.
The percentage of employees' time expended on the project is also pre-established (Doc No 720778, Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision).
7.
The Authority notes that in 2013 only the pilot projects were signed.
Vidjeti i Odluku Komisije 2006/225/EZ (SL L 81, 18.3.2006., str. 25.), uvodna izjava 43.
IN's letter dated 24 November 2014 (Document No 730560).
Dostupno na sljedećoj poveznici: https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/NHD/Vedlegg/Brev/2013_oppdragsbrev_innovasjonnorge.pdf#search=OPPDRAGSBREV&regj_oss=1
In the reply to the opening decision (Document No 720775), IN explains in further detail that the RTBs and DMOs have been involved in the new project structure since 2013.
Vidjeti presudu u predmetu Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) protiv Komisije, C-205/03, EU:C:2006:453, t. 26.
The RTBs and DMOs have also invested time and resources.
Mišljenje nezavisnog odvjetnika u predmetu Federación Española de Empresas de Tecnología Sanitaria (FENIN) protiv Komisije, C-205/03, EU:C:2005:666, t.
Their direct involvement and participation in the project justify an hourly rate below the general hour rate calculated by IN.
31.
A complete list of the extra cost of the pilots projects was submitted to the Authority as Annex 6 of IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720781).
Vidjeti presude u predmetima Pavel Pavlov i dr., C-180/98 do C-184/98, EU:C:2000:428, t.
This price methodology has been used by other private companies active in the market.
76., i Ambulanz Glöckner, C-475/99, EU:C:2001:577, t.
Information regarding this costs allocation method can be found at: https://www.adspeed.com/Knowledges/1104/Blog/How_much_charge_advertising_website.html or http://www.quora.com/What-is-an-industry-accepted-cost-per-page-view-of-dynamic-content-not-cache-able For instance, this is the methodology used by Google for some of its services (information available at https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/2472735?hl=en).
20.
IN's email to the Authority dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
Predmet E-6/98, Norveška protiv ESA-a, Rep. 1998., str. 242, t.
IN's email to the Authority dated 20 May 2015 (Document No 757843).
34.
A copy of the account was submitted to the Authority attached to IN's letter dated 28 October 2013 (Documents No 688215 and to, Annex 3 to IN's reply to the opening decision (Document No 720778).
Vidjeti i presude u predmetima Komisija i Španjolska protiv Vlade Gibraltara i Ujedinjene Kraljevine, C-106/09 i C-107/09, EU:C:2011:732, i Francuska protiv Komisije, C-241/94, EU:C:1996:353, t.
See also IN's email dated 14 April 2015 (Document No 753927).
19. i 20.
Judgment in EPAC v Commission, T-204/97 and T-270/97, EU:T:2000:148, paragraph 122.
Presuda u predmetu Ladbroke Racing protiv Komisije, T-67/94, EU:T:1998:7, t.
Judgment in Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission, (West-LB) T-228/99 and T-233/99, EU:T:2006:405, paragraph 207.
52., i SIC protiv Komisije, T-46/97, EU:T:2000:123, t.
Judgment in West-LB, see above, paragraph 314 and in Italy v Commission (Eni-Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, paragraph 22.
83.
Judgment in Chronopost SA v Commission, C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P and C-94/01 P EU:C:2003:388, paragraph 40.
Presuda u predmetu Chronopost SA protiv Komisije, C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P i C-94/01 P, EU:C:2003:388, t.
Section 1(2) of the Manufacturing Guidelines, which provides that ‘[t]his Chapter firstly focuses on, the one hand, on the act referred to in point 1 of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the Transparency Directive and, on the other hand, it develops the principle that where the State provides finances to a company in circumstances that would not be applicable to an investor operating under normal market economy conditions, it does this in contradiction to the market economy investor principle, and state aid is involved’.
40.
The Manufacturing Guidelines are available at: http://www.eftasurv.int/?1=1 & showLinkID=16995 & 1=1 ( OJ L 274, 26.10.2000.
Vidjeti, na primjer, odluke Tijela br. 84/15/COL o navodnom unakrsnom subvencioniranju obrazovnih programa u području pomorstva koje pružaju norveško udruženje za pomoć na moru (Redningsselskapet) i Sveučilište u Tromsøu (SL C 193, 11.6.2015., str. 9.), dostupno na sljedećoj poveznici: http://www.eftasurv.int/media/esa-docs/physical/84-15-COL.pdf); br. 142/03/COL o restrukturiranju i prijenosu javnih sredstava Zavodu za istraživanje rada (SL C 248, 16.10.2003., str. 6.), br. 343/09/COL o nekretninskim transakcijama općine Time u vezi s parcelama 1/152, 1/301, 1/630, 4/165, 2/70, 2/32 (SL L 123, 12.5.2011., str. 72.), br. 496/13/COL o financiranju koncertne dvorane i konferencijskog centra Harpa (Island) (SL L 172, 12.6.2014., str. 36.), uvodna izjava 56. i u njoj navedene odluke, i br. 174/13/COL o financiranju društava za prikupljanje komunalnog otpada (SL C 263, 12.9.2013., str. 5.).
EEA Supplement No 48 of the same date).
Jednako tako, u Smjernicama o državnim potporama za istraživanje, razvoj i inovacije navedeno je da „[a]ko isto tijelo obavlja djelatnosti gospodarske i negospodarske naravi, javna sredstva za negospodarske djelatnosti neće biti obuhvaćena člankom 61. stavkom 1.
Ibid, point 1 under the title ‘practicality of the market economy investor principle’.
Sporazuma o EGP-u ako se te dvije vrste djelatnosti i njihovi troškovi, financijska sredstva i prihodi mogu jasno odvojiti kako bi se učinkovito izbjeglo unakrsno subvencioniranje gospodarske djelatnosti.
This is in line with the mandates established regarding public services.
Dokaz o pravilnoj raspodjeli troškova, financijskih sredstava i prihoda može se sastojati od godišnjih financijskih izvješća relevantnog subjekta” (stavak 18., naglasak je dodan).
For instance, in the broadcasting guidelines the Authority considers that it is not reasonable to ask for a profit in the provision of the public service.
Ti su uvjeti utvrđeni Direktivom o transparentnosti (Direktivom Komisije 2006/111/EZ od 16. studenoga 2006. o transparentnosti financijskih odnosa između država članica i javnih poduzeća, kao i o financijskoj transparentnosti unutar određenih poduzeća (SL L 318, 17.11.2006., str. 17.), koja je uključena u Sporazum o EGP-u Odlukom Zajedničkog odbora EGP-a br. 55/2007 od 8. lipnja 2007.
On the contrary, regarding economic activities a profit element, which represents the fair remuneration of capital taking into account risk, is reasonable.
(SL L 266, 11.10.2007., str. 15., i Dodatak o EGP-u br. 48, 11.10.2007., str. 12.).
See paragraph 72 of the Guidelines.
Upućuje se na grafički prikaz iz dopisa IN-a od 28. listopada 2013.
IN provides through the platform visitnorway.com non-economic and economic services.
(Dokument br. 688215).
The overall operation of the platform does not necessarily provide for a profit.
Tijelo napominje da su troškovi razvoja bili uzeti u obzir u proračunu IN-a za 2013., godinu u kojoj su troškovi nastali.
However, the scope of the present decision is limited to access whether IN obtains a reasonable profit from the economic services.
Za daljnje pojedinosti vidjeti uvodne izjave od 113. do 115.
The figures regarding the provision of non-economic services fall outside the scope of the state aid rules.
Dodatak pošti IN-a upućenoj Tijelu 14. travnja 2015.
Detailed Excel sheets were sent to the Authority concerning the premium partner agreements costs and the economic model for cost allocation (Document No 727330).
(Dokument br. 753927).
Judgment in French Republic v Commission (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, EU:C:2002:294, paragraph 70.
Dodatak 2. pošti IN-a upućenoj Tijelu 14. travnja 2015.
According to the Court, ‘[i]t is necessary to place oneself in the context of the period during which the financial support measures were taken in order to assess the economic rationality of the State's conduct, and thus to refrain from any assessment based on a later situation’ (paragraph 71).
(Dokument br. 753927).
Document No 720781.
Prilog 3. odgovoru IN-a na odluku o pokretanju postupka (Dokument br. 720778).
The case-law accepts that public companies might look at long-term profit maximisation.
Kapitalizirani je trošak priznat kao dio dugotrajne imovine u bilanci društva, odnosno ne knjiži se kao rashod u razdoblju u kojem je nastao.
See judgments in Italy v Commission (Lanerossi), C-303/88, EU:C:1991:136, paragraph 22; Italy v Commission (ALFA-FIAT), C-305/89, EU:C:1991:142, paragraph 20; and Ciudad de la Luz v Commission, T-319/12 and T-321/12, EU:T:2014:604, paragraph 41.
Stoga se nekapitalizirani trošak smatra rashodom samo za godinu u kojoj je nastao.
The General Court has underlined the need for public undertakings to demonstrate the economic rationale of their projects.
Primjerak NRS-a 19. dostavljen je Tijelu kao Prilog II. dopisu od 24. studenoga 2014.
On that occasion, the Norwegian authorities provided new information and clarifications on their submission dated 1 September 2014.
(Dokument br. 730560).
The Authority also asked IN additional questions which were replied to by email dated 17 October 2014 [5].
U odgovoru na odluku o pokretanju postupka (Dokument br. 720775) IN detaljnije objašnjava da su RTZ-ovi i AUO-ovi bili uključeni u strukturu novog projekta od 2013.
Their objective is rather to stimulate the economic activity of the tourism sector in their respective geographical areas [21].
Izravnom je uključenošću i sudjelovanjem u projektu opravdana satnica niža od opće satnice koju je izračunao IN.
No 61/16/COL
br. 61/16/COL
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), in particular to Article 61 and Protocol 26,
UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru (dalje u tekstu: „Sporazum o EGP-u”), a posebno članak 61. i Protokol 26.,
HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (‘the Surveillance and Court Agreement’), in particular to Article 24,
UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Sporazum među državama EFTA-e o osnivanju Nadzornog tijela i Suda (dalje u tekstu: „Sporazum o nadzoru i sudu”), a posebno članak 24.,
HAVING REGARD to Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement (‘Protocol 3’), in particular to Article 1 of Part I and Article 7(2) of Part II,
UZIMAJUĆI U OBZIR Protokol 3. uz Sporazum o nadzoru i sudu (dalje u tekstu: „Protokol 3.”), a posebno dio I. članak 1. i dio II. članak 7. stavak 2.,
By letter dated 16 July 2010 (Document No 565828), Míla ehf.
Dopisom od 16. srpnja 2010.
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Míla’ or ‘the complainant’) submitted a complaint to the EFTA Surveillance Authority (‘the Authority’) concerning alleged unlawful state aid granted by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in Iceland through leases for the use and operation of two optical fibres, which were previously operated on behalf of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (‘NATO’).
(Dokument br. 565828), trgovačko društvo Míla ehf.
On 19 February 2013, Míla lodged an application to the EFTA Court for the annulment of Decision No 410/12/COL.
Društvo Míla podnijelo je 19. veljače 2013. zahtjev Sudu EFTA-e za poništaj Odluke br. 410/12/COL.
By its judgment of 27 January 2014 in Case E-1/13, the EFTA Court annulled the Authority's Decision [4].
Svojom presudom od 27. siječnja 2014. u predmetu E-1/13 Sud EFTA-e poništio je Odluku Tijela.
On 16 July 2014, the Authority adopted Decision No 299/14/COL to initiate the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 1(2) of Part I of Protocol 3 and invited the Icelandic authorities as well as interested parties to provide comments.
[4]
The Authority received comments by the Icelandic authorities (Documents No 722921- 722923) as well as third party comments by Míla (Document No 729699), Vodafone (Document No 723556) and a private individual (Document No 729917).
Tijelo je 16. srpnja 2014. donijelo Odluku br. 299/14/COL o pokretanju službenog istražnog postupka predviđenog u dijelu I. članku 1. stavku 2.
The third party comments were forwarded to the Icelandic authorities, who provided comments on them (Documents No 744468-744471 and 753302-753303).
Protokola 3. i pozvalo je islandska nadležna tijela i zainteresirane stranke da dostave svoje primjedbe.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE
Tijelo je zaprimilo primjedbe islandskih nadležnih tijela (dokumenti br. 722921– 722923) te primjedbe trećih stranaka koje su dostavila društva Míla (dokument br. 729699), Vodafone (dokument br. 723556) i jedna privatna osoba (dokument br. 729917).
BACKGROUND — INVITATION TO TENDER FOR THE LEASE OF TWO OPTICAL FIBRES OPERATED ON BEHALF OF NATO
Primjedbe trećih stranaka proslijeđene su islandskim nadležnim tijelima koja su dostavila primjedbe na njih (dokumenti br. 744468-744471 i 753302-753303).
On 15 August 2007, the Icelandic Government fully took over the operation of the Radar Agency (Ratsjárstofnun) [5], which had until that time been operated under the auspices of the US authorities.
OPIS MJERE
The Radar Agency had previously operated three optical fibres in the approximately 1850 km long, eight-fibre optical cable circling Iceland and its North-West region [6].
POZADINA – POZIV NA PODNOŠENJE PONUDE ZA ZAKUP DVAJU OPTIČKIH VLAKANA ČIJIM SE RADOM UPRAVLJA U IME NATO-a
This opened up opportunities for the Icelandic Government to put one or more of the three fibres to other use.
Islandska vlada je 15. kolovoza 2007. potpuno preuzela upravljanje radom Agencije za radare (Ratsjárstofnun) [5], čiji je rad dotad bio pod nadzorom američkih nadležnih tijela.
The Icelandic authorities decided to use one of the fibres for the Icelandic Air Defence System (‘IADS’) and for secure governmental telecommunications.
Agencija za radare prethodno je upravljala trima optičkim vlaknima u optičkom kablu od osam vlakana duljine otprilike 1850 km koji okružuje Island i njegovu sjeverozapadnu regiju.
The authorities further decided that the State Trading Centre (Ríkiskaup) should carry out a tender award procedure for the use and operation of the other two fibres [7].
Time se omogućilo islandskoj vladi da upotrijebi jedno ili više od tri vlakna u druge svrhe.
The details of the invitation to tender were set out in the project description drafted by Ríkiskaup.
Islandska nadležna tijela odlučila su upotrijebiti jedno od vlakana za Islandski zračni obrambeni sustav („IADS”) i za sigurne državne telekomunikacije.
According to that document, Ríkiskaup, on behalf of the Defence Department of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, invited tenders for the use and operation of two of the three optical fibres to be leased out to two unrelated parties, with the intention of negotiating a lease for the duration of 10 years.
Nadležna tijela odlučila su i da bi Državni trgovački centar (Ríkiskaup) trebao provesti natječajni postupak za uporabu i rad dvaju drugih vlakana.
According to the tender, the optical cable is about 1850 km in length, lies intact between the present 16 termination points (as of the date of the tender) and goes through telephone exchanges and other telecommunication installations on its way circling Iceland.
[7]
Telephone exchanges and other telecommunications installations are, for the most part, owned by and under the supervision of Míla.
Pojedinosti poziva na podnošenje ponuda utvrđeni su u opisu projekta koji je izradio Ríkiskaup.
According to point 2.3 of the tender, the proposed lease will not include any facilities for equipment of the lessee.
U skladu s tim dokumentima, Ríkiskaup je, u ime Obrambene agencije Ministarstva vanjskih poslova, objavio poziv na podnošenje ponuda za uporabu i upravljanje dvama od tri optičkih vlakana koja će se dati u zakup dvama nepovezanim strankama s namjerom pregovaranja o desetogodišnjem zakupu.
The lessee will be responsible for obtaining necessary facilities for its equipment or any other facilities needed to use the fibres.
U natječaju je navedeno da je optički kabel duljine otprilike 1850 km i da se proteže između postojećih 16 priključnih točaka (na dan ponude) te prolazi kroz telefonske centrale i drugu telekomunikacijsku opremu na putu oko Islanda.
The lessee is thus responsible for securing access to facilities and the termination points where it intends to connect its equipment to the fibre.
Telefonske centrale i ostala telekomunikacijska oprema većinom su u vlasništvu i pod nadzorom društva Mila.
In case the lessee needs to acquire or rent facilities for its equipment, additional connections or other items, the lessee will bear the costs.
Prema točki 2.3. natječaja, predloženi zakup neće uključivati objekte za opremu zakupoprimca.
The lessee is responsible for all communications with the owners of facilities, the lessor being neither an intermediary nor the provider of facilities of any kind nor will the lessor guarantee that the lessee will have access to facilities at assembly points or elsewhere.
Zakupoprimac će biti odgovoran za nabavu odgovarajućih objekata za svoju opremu ili drugih objekata potrebnih za uporabu vlakana.
The lessee may add new termination points to the optical fibre, but this must be done in consultation with the lessor and other co-owners of the fibre.
Zakupoprimac je stoga odgovoran za osiguravanje pristupa objektima i priključnim točkama na kojima planira povezati svoju opremu s vlaknom.
The lessee will bear any costs associated with the adding of new termination points.
Ako zakupoprimac mora kupiti ili iznajmiti objekte za svoju opremu, dodatne veze ili druge stavke, on će snositi sve troškove.
Detailed requirements are set to secure that any access to the cable by the lessee and the addition of termination points are carefully prepared and executed in a professional manner so as to secure uninterrupted use of the cable by others.
Zakupoprimac je odgovoran za svu komunikaciju s vlasnicima objekata pri čemu zakupodavac nije ni posrednik ni pružatelj bilo kakve vrste objekata niti će jamčiti da će zakupoprimac imati pristup objektima na točkama sklapanja ili negdje drugdje.
As concerns the rental charge, the invitation to tender sets a minimum rental charge of ISK 19000000 per year for each fibre to ensure that the cost of operation and maintenance of the optical fibres would be covered [9].
Zakupoprimac može na optičko vlakno dodati nove priključne točke, ali to mora učiniti u dogovoru sa zakupodavcem i drugim suvlasnicima vlakna.
The closing date for submitting offers and for opening of offers was 19 June 2008.
Zakupoprimac će snositi sve troškove povezane s dodavanjem novih priključnih točaka.
The assessment of offers was based on the following criteria:
Utvrđeni su detaljni zahtjevi kako bi se osiguralo da su pristup zakupoprimca kablovima i dodavanje priključnih točaka pažljivo pripremljeni i da se ostvaruju na profesionalan način kako bi se osiguralo da se drugi mogu nesmetano koristiti kablom.
Table 1
U pogledu naknade za zakup, u pozivu na podnošenje ponuda utvrđena je minimalna naknada u iznosu od 19000000 ISK godišnje za svako vlakno kako bi se osiguralo pokrivanje troškova rada i održavanja optičkih vlakana.
Award criteria in the tender
Krajnji datum za podnošenje ponuda i njihovo otvaranje bio je 19. lipnja 2008.
Matter of Judgment
Ocjenjivanje ponuda temeljilo se na sljedećim kriterijima:
Percentage points
Tablica 1.
Stimulation of Competition
Kriteriji za dodjelu u natječaju
Rental Charge
Prosudba
Commencement of Services
Postotni bodovi
Supply of Services
Poticanje tržišnog natjecanja
Number of network termination points
Naknada za zakup
One Tariff throughout the Country
Početak pružanja usluga
The outcome of the tender was that five offers were received from four independent undertakings, as summarised in Table 2 below.
Pružanje usluga
Two of the offers were variant offers:
Broj priključnih točaka mreže
Table 2
Jedna tarifa u cijeloj zemlji
Offers received in the tender
Tijekom natječajnog postupka zaprimljeno je pet ponuda od četiri neovisna poduzetnika kako je sažeto u tablici 2. u nastavku.
Name of company
Dvije ponude sadržavale su varijantna rješenja:
Leasing price offered
Tablica 2.
Award criteria: total points scored
Zaprimljene ponude na natječaj