natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In order to enable the allocation of the sea-fishing products and goods to the respective fishing logbook in the cases where the certification of non-manipulation is provided on a form or document other than the printout of the fishing logbook, the economic operator should include in that other form or document a reference to the respective fishing logbook.
Kako bi se osigurala dosljednost odredaba o osiguranjima, upućivanje u članku 83.
The possibility in Article 136 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 to declare a means of transport for temporary admission orally should be extended to cover the specific situations referred to Articles 214, 215 and 216 of that Delegated Regulation because the standard customs formalities are normally unnecessary for such goods.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 na države članice trebalo bi zamijeniti upućivanjem na carinska tijela.
The calculation of the amount of import duty in certain cases of inward processing has been provided for twice in the same way in Articles 76(b) and 168(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Rok za donošenje odluke o povratu ili otpustu iz članka 97.
This overlap should be removed by deleting Article 168(2).
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi produljiti ako nadležno carinsko tijelo nije u mogućnosti dovršiti procjenu i donijeti odluku o povratu ili otpustu u propisanom roku jer odluka koju treba donijeti ovisi o ishodu predmeta koji se vodi pred Sudom Europske unije, u skladu s člankom 267.
End-use authorisations allowing the storage together of different products falling within Chapters 27 and 29 of the Combined Nomenclature (‘mixed storage’) should establish sufficient guarantees for the subsequent identification of the different goods that have been mixed and for enabling their supervision by customs.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije, a koji uključuje identična ili usporediva činjenična i pravna pitanja ili ovisi o posebnim upravnim postupcima koji su u tijeku i koji mogu utjecati na tu odluku.
A similar provision to that existing under the repealed Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 should be introduced into Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446.
Kako bi se osiguralo da produljenje roka za donošenje odluke nema negativan utjecaj na tužitelja, to bi produljenje trebalo biti moguće samo ako podnositelj zahtjeva na njega pristane te bi ga trebalo jasno ograničiti na te posebne situacije.
In order to ensure consistency with Article 118(4) of the Code, Article 189 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should allow for defective goods or goods not complying with the terms of the contract to be placed under external transit procedure, instead of being taken out of the customs territory of the Union, both of which leads for those goods to the loss of their customs status of Union goods.
Kako bi se osigurao nesmetan tok trgovine robom Unije između dijelova carinskog područja Unije na koje se primjenjuje Direktiva Vijeća 2006/112/EZ ili Direktiva Vijeća 2008/118/EZ i dijelova tog područja u kojima se te odredbe ne primjenjuju (posebna fiskalna područja), člancima 114. i 134.
With a view to simplifying the use of the export procedure followed by a transit procedure and in order to eliminate the risk that a customs debt and a debt for other charges not covered by a guarantee arises, Union goods exported to a third country and moved through the customs territory of the Union under a TIR operation or under a transit procedure in accordance with the ATA/Istanbul Convention should be required to be placed under the external transit procedure and hence become non-Union goods.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi utvrditi određena pojednostavnjenja u pogledu carinskih formalnosti i provjera koje se primjenjuju na trgovinu unutar iste države članice.
In order to facilitate the supervision by the customs authorities of movements of goods referred to in Article 1 of Council Directive 2008/118/EC placed under the export procedure followed by the transit procedure, those goods should be allowed to be placed under the external transit procedure, by which they lose their customs status of Union goods.
U skladu s člankom 115.
In order to facilitate the processing of applications by customs authorities and to make the application process more efficient for economic operators authorised consignors should be allowed to submit applications for an authorisation to use seals of a special type to the customs authority which is competent to grant the status of authorised consignor.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 mjesto koje nije nadležni carinski ured može se odobriti u svrhu podnošenja robe, uz uvjet da se roba deklarira za carinski postupak ili se ponovno izveze u vrlo kratkom roku.
A number of provisions relating to temporary admission refer to means of transport used privately or commercially.
To razdoblje trebalo bi se neznatno produljiti kako bi veći broj gospodarskih subjekata mogao ispuniti taj uvjet.
The meaning of those terms should be clarified for the purposes of all the rules on total relief from import duty in the context of temporary admission.
Isto produljenje trebalo bi primijeniti na uvjet u pogledu odobrenja mjesta koje nije prostor za privremeni smještaj robe.
The definitions laid down in Article 215(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should therefore be converted into a more general rule in Article 207 of that Delegated Regulation.
Kako bi se zaštitile informacije o mjestu ulova proizvoda ribarstva pri dostavi ispisa očevidnika o ribolovu nadležnim tijelima trećih zemalja kako bi ta tijela mogla potvrditi da nije bilo manipulacije proizvodima morskog ribolova i robom koja je pretovarena i prevezena kroz tu zemlju ili to područje, gospodarskim subjektima trebalo bi omogućiti brisanje tih podataka iz ispisa očevidnika o ribolovu za potrebe te potvrde.
A new paragraph should be introduced into Article 215 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, so that natural persons who have their habitual residence in the customs territory of the Union may benefit from the temporary admission procedure so that they can use privately hired non-Union means of road transport in the Union.
Kako bi se omogućila raspodjela proizvoda morskog ribolova i robe u odgovarajući očevidnik o ribolovu u slučajevima u kojima je potvrda da nije bilo manipulacije navedena na obrascu ili dokumentu koji nije očevidnik o ribolovu, gospodarski bi subjekt na tom drugom obrascu ili dokumentu trebao navesti upućivanje na odgovarajući očevidnik o ribolovu.
Opening this possibility would solve some problems facing car rental agencies and encourage border tourism.
Mogućnost usmene deklaracije prijevoznog sredstva za privremeni uvoz predviđena člankom 136.
However, as temporary admission is mainly designed for persons established outside of the Union, Article 218 should limit such private use to a short period of time.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi proširiti tako da obuhvaća posebne situacije iz članaka 214., 215. i 216. te Delegirane uredbe jer su standardne carinske formalnosti obično nepotrebne za takvu robu.
The use of the temporary admission procedure in accordance with Article 218, Article 220, Article 223, Article 228 and Articles 231 to 236 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should also be allowed where the holder of the procedure is established inside the customs territory of the Union.
Izračun iznosa uvozne carine u određenim slučajevima unutarnje proizvodnje predviđen je dva puta na isti način u članku 76. točki (b) i članku 168. stavku 2.
This flexibility is needed because there is no reason justifying a different treatment of persons established in and outside the customs territory of the Union for the purposes of temporary import of certain goods, such as goods to be exhibited or used at a public event.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446.
In order to ensure that the legal provisions are properly implemented in the relevant electronic systems, certain provisions of Annexes A and B to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should be amended.
To preklapanje trebalo bi ukloniti brisanjem članka 168. stavka 2.
Annex 22-01 to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 provides for specific rules for determining the country where certain goods underwent their last substantial transformation within the meaning of Article 32 of the same Regulation.
U Delegiranu uredbu (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi uvesti odredbu sličnu onoj koja postoji u Uredbi Komisije (EEZ) br. 2454/93, koja je stavljena izvan snage.
Such a list of rules should be extended to include additional products in order to allow a uniform interpretation of the principle of the last substantial transformation for those products.
Kako bi se osigurala dosljednost s člankom 118. stavkom 4.
In addition, to ensure that the rules are properly applied, the list is updated to the last version of the goods nomenclature established under the International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (Harmonised System).
Zakonika, trebalo bi člankom 189.
Following the publication of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446, some errors of different types have been detected and need to be corrected.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 omogućiti da se neispravna roba ili roba koja nije u skladu s uvjetima ugovora stavi u postupak vanjskog provoza umjesto da se iznosi iz carinskog područja Unije, zbog čega takva roba gubi carinski status robe Unije.
In Articles 124a, 126a, 129a, 129d, 131, 193, 195 and 197, the reference to the Articles of the Code being supplemented needs to be more precise.
Kako bi se pojednostavnila primjena postupka izvoza nakon kojeg slijedi postupak provoza i kako bi se uklonio rizik nastanka carinskog duga i duga za druge pristojbe koje nisu obuhvaćene osiguranjem, trebalo bi propisati da se roba Unije koja se izvozi u treću zemlju i premješta unutar carinskog područja Unije u okviru postupka TIR ili postupka provoza u skladu s Konvencijom ATA ili Istanbulskom konvencijom, stavlja u postupak vanjskog provoza i stoga postaje roba koja nije roba Unije.
In Annexes A and B, certain data element need to be better defined.
Kako bi se carinskim tijelima olakšao nadzor kretanja robe iz članka 1.
To ensure consistency, the specimens in Annexes B-03 and B-05 containing an error in the numerical reference to the element ‘Reference number/UCR’ should be replaced and an error in the reference to the common data element ‘CN code, net quantity, value (M)’ in Annex 71-05 should be corrected.
Direktive Vijeća 2008/118/EZ stavljene u postupak izvoza nakon kojeg slijedi postupak provoza, trebalo bi dopustiti da se ta roba stavi u postupak vanjskog provoza, čime ona gubi carinski status robe Unije.
Some wrong references to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92, to Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 and to the Code should be corrected in Annex 90.
Kako bi se carinskim tijelima olakšala obrada zahtjeva i postupak učinio učinkovitijim za gospodarske subjekte, trebalo bi ovlaštenim pošiljateljima omogućiti predaju zahtjeva za izdavanje odobrenja za uporabu posebne vrste plombi carinskom tijelu koje je nadležno za odobravanje statusa ovlaštenog pošiljatelja.
The amending provisions of this Regulation modify several provisions of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 that have proved difficult to apply in practice.
Niz odredaba u vezi s privremenim uvozom odnose se na prijevozna sredstva koja se upotrebljavaju za privatne ili komercijalne svrhe.
They should ensure that the Code and the Delegated Regulation are implemented more in line with economic reality and are therefore urgently needed.
Značenje tih pojmova trebalo bi pojasniti u smislu svih pravila o potpunom oslobođenju od uvozne carine u okviru privremenog uvoza.
For the sake of legal certainty, the new provision regarding the use of means other than electronic data-processing techniques in relation to applications and decisions for which the relevant data requirements are not set out in Annex A to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should apply from 2 October 2017.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi stoga preinačiti u općenitije pravilo iz članka 207. te Delegirane uredbe.
On that date, the UCC Customs Decision System referred to in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/578 was deployed and since then, pursuant to Article 2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/341, the customs authorities can no longer allow the use of means other than electronic data processing techniques for customs decisions and applications.
U članak 215.
However, after 2 October 2017, certain applications and decisions in the paper form still have had to be used.
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi uvesti novi stavak kojim bi se fizičkim osobama koje imaju uobičajeno boravište na carinskom području Unije omogućilo iskorištavanje pogodnosti postupka privremenog uvoza, kako bi se u Uniji mogle služiti sredstvima cestovnog prijevoza koja su privatno unajmljena izvan Unije.
These should produce effects for a certain period of time and it is neither in the economic operator's interest nor the Member State's interest that their validity is put into question for the lack of due form.
Uvođenjem te mogućnosti riješili bi se određeni problemi s kojima se suočavaju agencije za iznajmljivanje automobila i potaknuo turizam u pograničnim područjima.
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 should therefore be amended and corrected accordingly,
Međutim, s obzirom na to da je privremeni uvoz uglavnom namijenjen osobama koje imaju poslovni nastan izvan Unije, člankom 218. trebalo bi takvu privatnu uporabu ograničiti na kratko razdoblje.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Usto, trebalo bi dopustiti primjenu postupka privremenog uvoza u skladu s člancima 218., 220., 223., 228. te člancima od 231. do 236.
Article 1
Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446, uz uvjet da korisnik postupka ima poslovni nastan na carinskom području Unije.
Amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446
Takva je fleksibilnost potrebna jer ne postoji razlog kojim se opravdava različito postupanje prema osobama s poslovnim nastanom na carinskom području Unije te izvan njega kad je riječ o privremenom uvozu određene robe, primjerice robe namijenjene izlaganju ili upotrebi na javnim događanjima.
Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 is amended as follows:
Kako bi se osigurala pravilna primjena pravnih propisa u odgovarajućim elektroničkim sustavima, trebalo bi izmijeniti određene odredbe priloga A i B Delegiranoj uredbi (EU) 2015/2446.
Article 1(19) is replaced by the following:
Takav popis pravila trebalo bi proširiti na dodatne proizvode kako bi se omogućilo jedinstveno tumačenje načela posljednje bitne obrade ili prerade za te proizvode.
‘exporter’ means:
Usto, kako bi se osigurala pravilna primjena propisa, popis se ažurira na zadnju verziju nomenklature robe uspostavljenu Međunarodnom konvencijom o Harmoniziranom sustavu nazivlja i brojčanog označivanja robe (Harmonizirani sustav).
a private individual carrying goods to be taken out of the customs territory of the Union where these goods are contained in the private individual's personal baggage;
Nakon objave Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 otkrivene su određene pogreške različite vrste koje treba ispraviti.
in other cases, where (a) does not apply:
U člancima 124.a, 126.a, 129.a, 129.d, 131., 193., 195. i 197. potrebno je preciznije upućivanje na članke Zakonika koji se njima dopunjuju.
a person established in the customs territory of the Union, who has the power to determine and has determined that the goods are to be taken out of that customs territory;
U prilozima A i B potrebno je bolje definirati određene podatkovne elemente.
where (i) does not apply, any person established in the customs territory of the Union who is a party to the contract under which goods are to be taken out of that customs territory.’;
Kako bi se osigurala dosljednost, trebalo bi zamijeniti ogledne primjerke iz priloga B-03 i B-05 koji sadržavaju pogrešku u brojčanom upućivanju na element „Referentni broj/UCR” te ispraviti pogrešku u upućivanju na zajednički podatkovni element „Oznaka KN, neto količina, vrijednost (M)” iz Priloga 71-05.
in Article 5(1) the following point is added:
U Prilogu 90. potrebno je ispraviti određena pogrešna upućivanja na Uredbu Vijeća (EEZ) br. 2913/92, Uredbu (EEZ) br. 2454/93 i na Zakonik.
requesting registration and endorsement of proof of customs status of Union goods.’;
Odredbama o izmjeni ove Uredbe prilagođuju se određene odredbe Delegirane Uredbe (EU) 2015/2446 za koje se pokazalo da ih je u praksi teško primijeniti.
in Title I, Chapter 2, Section 2, the following is inserted:
Tim bi se odredbama trebala osigurati provedba Zakonika i Delegirane uredbe koja je dosljednija gospodarskoj situaciji pa su stoga hitno potrebne.
‘Subsection 0
Ova bi Uredba stoga trebala stupiti na snagu sljedećeg dana od dana objave.
Means for the exchange of information used for applications and decisions for which the relevant data requirements are not set out in Annex A
Međutim, određeni zahtjevi i odluke morali su se i dalje upotrebljavati u papirnatom obliku nakon 2. listopada 2017.
Article 7a
Oni bi u određenom razdoblju trebali proizvoditi pravne učinke i nije u interesu ni gospodarskog subjekta ni države članice da se njihova valjanost dovede u pitanje zbog toga što nisu u propisanom obliku.
Applications and decisions made by means other than electronic data-processing techniques
Delegiranu uredbu (EU) 2015/2446 trebalo bi stoga na odgovarajući način izmijeniti i ispraviti,
(Article 6(3)(a) of the Code)
DONIJELA JE OVU UREDBU:
Customs authorities may allow the use of means other than electronic data-processing techniques in relation to applications and decisions for which the relevant data requirements are not set out in Annex A and in relation to any subsequent applications and acts relating to the management of those decisions.’;
Članak 1.
in Article 10, point (a) is replaced by the following:
Izmjene Delegirane uredbe (EU) 2015/2446
where the application for a decision is not accepted in accordance with Article 11 of this Regulation or with the second subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447;
Delegirana uredba (EU) 2015/2446 mijenja se kako slijedi:
in Article 37(21), points (b) and (c) are replaced by the following:
1. članak 1. stavak 19. zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
an exporter who is established in a Member State and is registered with the customs authorities of that Member State for the purpose of exporting products originating in the Union to a country or territory with which the Union has a preferential trade arrangement; or
‚izvoznik’ znači:
a re-consignor of goods who is established in a Member State and is registered with the customs authorities of that Member State for the purpose of making out replacement statements on origin in order to re-consign originating products elsewhere within the customs territory of the Union or, where applicable, to Norway or Switzerland (‘a registered re-consignor’);’;
fizička osoba koja prevozi robu koja se iznosi iz carinskog područja Unije, ako se ta roba nalazi u osobnoj prtljazi te fizičke osobe;
Article 40 is replaced by the following:
u ostalim slučajevima u kojima se točka (a) ne primjenjuje:
‘Article 40
i. osoba s poslovnim nastanom na carinskom području Unije koja ima ovlasti za odlučivanje i odlučila je da se roba iznese iz tog carinskog područja;
Means for applying to become a registered exporter and for exchanging information with registered exporters
ako se podtočka i. ne primjenjuje, bilo koja osoba s poslovnim nastanom na carinskom području Unije koja je stranka u ugovoru na temelju kojeg se roba iznosi iz tog carinskog područja.”;
Means other than electronic data-processing techniques may be used for all communications and exchanges of information in relation to applications and decisions concerning the status of a registered exporter and in relation to any subsequent applications and acts relating to the management of those decisions.’;
u članku 5. stavku 1. dodaje se sljedeća točka:
in Article 53, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:
podnošenja zahtjeva za registraciju i ovjeru dokaza o carinskom statusu robe Unije.”;
‘Articles 41 to 52 of this Regulation and Article 108 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 shall apply mutatis mutandis to exports from the Union to a beneficiary country for the purposes of bilateral cumulation.’;
u glavi I. poglavlju 2. odjeljku 2. umeće se sljedeće:
Article 55 is amended as follows:
„Pododjeljak 0.
paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
Sredstva razmjene informacija koja se upotrebljavaju za zahtjeve i odluke za koje odgovarajući zahtjevi u pogledu podataka nisu utvrđeni u Prilogu A
Regional cumulation between beneficiary countries in the same regional group shall apply only under the condition that the working or processing carried out in the beneficiary country where the materials are further processed or incorporated goes beyond the operations described in Article 47(1) and, in the case of textile products, also beyond the operations set out in Annex 22-05.
Članak 7.a
Where the condition laid down in the first subparagraph is not fulfilled, the country to be stated as country of origin on the proof of origin issued or made out for the purposes of exporting the products to the Union shall be the country of the regional group where the highest share of the value of the materials used in the manufacture of the final product originates.’;
Zahtjevi i odluke koji nisu podneseni tehnikama elektroničke obrade podataka
paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:
(članak 6. stavak 3. točka (a) Zakonika)
When granted, regional cumulation between beneficiary countries of Group I or Group III shall allow materials originating in a country of one regional group to be considered as materials originating in a country of the other regional group when incorporated in a product obtained there, provided that the working or processing carried out in the latter beneficiary country goes beyond the operations described in Article 47(1) and, in the case of textile products, also beyond the operations set out in Annex 22-05.
Carinska tijela mogu dopustiti upotrebu drugih sredstava osim tehnika elektroničke obrade podataka kad je riječ o zahtjevima i odlukama za koje odgovarajući zahtjevi u pogledu podataka nisu utvrđeni u Prilogu A i o svim daljnjim zahtjevima i aktima koji se odnose na upravljanje tim odlukama.”;
Where the condition laid down in the first subparagraph is not fulfilled, the country to be stated as country of origin on the proof of origin for the purposes of exporting the products to the Union shall be the country participating in the cumulation where the highest share of the value of the materials used in the manufacture of the final product originates.’;
u članku 10. točka (a) zamjenjuje se sljedećim:
paragraph 8 is replaced by the following:
ako zahtjev za odluku nije prihvaćen u skladu s člankom 11. ove Uredbe ili u skladu s člankom 12. stavkom 2. drugim podstavkom Provedbene uredbe Komisije (EU) 2015/2447;
Articles 41 to 52 of this Regulation and Articles 108 to 111 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 shall apply mutatis mutandis to exports from one beneficiary country to another for the purposes of regional cumulation.’;
u članku 37. stavku 21. točke (b) i (c) zamjenjuju se sljedećim:
in Article 76, point (b) is replaced by the following:
izvoznik s poslovnim nastanom u državi članici koji je registriran pri carinskim tijelima te države članice za potrebe izvoza proizvoda podrijetlom iz Unije u zemlju ili područje s kojima Unija ima sporazum o povlaštenoj trgovini ili