natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tariff classification
[Varšava, Poljska]
[Warsaw, Poland]
Proizvod obuhvaćen OTI-jem iz Priloga je po svojim objektivnim obilježjima i svojstvima identičan proizvodu opisanom u mišljenju 2530.90/2 Odbora za Harmonizirani sustav WCO-a o razvrstavanju kao „sipki bijeli prah koji sadržava više od 99,2 % masenog udjela bezvodnog dinatrijeva sulfata, dobiven samo mehaničkim prikupljanjem tenardita (bezvodni dinatrijev sulfat) koji prirodno nastaje na otvorenom na površini mirabilita (dinatrijev sulfat dekahidrat) kristaliziranog iz prirodne jezerske slane vode zbog niske temperature zimi.
In that WCO HSC classification opinion the classification of the product is under subheading 253090 of the Harmonized System, which corresponds to subheading 25309000 of the Combined Nomenclature.
Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie
01-513 Warszawa
ul.
of 10 January 2019
оd 10. siječnja 2019.
Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine, and in particular Articles 9(2) and 10(2) thereof,
uzimajući u obzir Direktivu Vijeća 64/432/EEZ od 26. lipnja 1964. o zdravstvenim problemima životinja koji utječu na trgovinu govedima i svinjama unutar Zajednice, a posebno njezin članak 9. stavak 2. i članak 10. stavak 2,
The Bulgarian and French language versions of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC contain an error in Article 3(1)(b).
Bugarska i francuska jezična verzija Odluke Komisije 2004/558/EZ sadržavaju pogrešku u članku 3. stavku 1. točki (b).
Done at Brussels, 10 January 2019.
Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 10. siječnja 2019.
OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977.
SL 121, 29.7.1964., str. 1977.
Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States (OJ L 249, 23.7.2004, p. 20).
Odluka Komisije 2004/558/EZ od 15. srpnja 2004. o provedbi Direktive Vijeća 64/432/EEZ u odnosu na dodatna jamstva za trgovinu govedima unutar Zajednice u pogledu zaraznog goveđeg rinotraheitisa i odobrenju programa iskorjenjivanja koji su predstavile određene države članice (SL L 249, 23.7.2004., str. 20.).
of 28 May 2018
оd 28. svibnja 2018. o programu potpore SA.
on aid scheme SA.34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) implemented by Germany for baseload consumers under Paragraph 19 StromNEV
34045 (2013/c) (ex 2012/NN) koji je provela Njemačka za potrošače baznog opterećenja iz članka 19.
(notified under document C(2018) 3166)
StromNEV-a
(Only the German version is authentic)
(priopćeno pod brojem dokumenta C(2018) 3166)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(Vjerodostojan je samo tekst na njemačkom jeziku)
Having given notice to the parties concerned to submit their comments and having regard to their comments,
uzimajući u obzir Sporazum o Europskom gospodarskom prostoru, a posebno njegov članak 62. stavak 1. točku (a),
Whereas:
nakon što je zainteresiranim stranama uputila obavijest da dostave svoje primjedbe i uzimajući u obzir njihove primjedbe,
By complaints submitted by the Bund der Energieverbraucher e.V. on 28 November 2011, by the GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH on 8 December and by citizens since December 2011, the Commission was informed that Germany had implemented since 2011 a full exemption from network charges for certain large electricity consumers.
POSTUPAK
By letter dated 29 June 2012, Germany provided the Commission with further information on that aid scheme.
Poduzetnik Bund der Energieverbraucher e.V. u svojoj pritužbi od 28. studenoga 2011., poduzetnik GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH u svojoj pritužbi od 8. prosinca 2011. i građani u pritužbama iz prosinca 2011. obavijestili su Komisiju da Njemačka od 2011. provodi potpuno izuzeće nekih velikih potrošača električne energije od naknada za upotrebu mreže.
By letter dated 6 March 2013 (‘the Opening Decision’), the Commission informed Germany that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereafter: TFEU or Treaty) in respect of the aid scheme.
U dopisu od 29. lipnja 2012.
Germany submitted its comments on the Opening Decision on 8 April 2013.
Njemačka je Komisiji dostavila dodatne informacije o tom programu potpore.
The Opening Decision was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Komisija je dopisom od 6. ožujka 2013. („odluka o pokretanju postupka”) obavijestila Njemačku da je u pogledu programa potpore odlučila pokrenuti postupak utvrđen člankom 108. stavkom 2.
The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid scheme.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (u daljnjem tekstu UFEU ili Ugovor).
The Commission received comments from interested parties.
Njemačka je 8. travnja 2013. dostavila svoje primjedbe na odluku o pokretanju postupka.
It forwarded them to Germany, which was given the opportunity to react; its comments were received by letter dated 5 November 2013.
Odluka o pokretanju postupka objavljena je u Službenom listu Europske unije.
During a meeting of 17 October 2013 and by letters notified on 7 April 2015, 20 July 2016, 6 July 2017, 18 September 2017, 3 October 2017 and 23 October 2017, the Commission requested Germany to provide information.
Komisija je pozvala zainteresirane strane da dostave svoje primjedbe u pogledu programa potpore.
The latest information was submitted on 11 December 2017.
Proslijedila ih je Njemačkoj, koja je imala priliku dostaviti svoj odgovor.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID
Njezine primjedbe primljene su u dopisu od 5. studenoga 2013.
NETWORK CHARGES IN GERMANY
Na sastanku održanom 17. listopada 2013. i u dopisima od 7. travnja 2015., 20. srpnja 2016., 6. srpnja 2017., 18. rujna 2017., 3. listopada 2017. i 23. listopada 2017.
The system of network charges in Germany is governed by the German Energy Act (Energiewirtschaftsgesetz, ‘EnWG’).
Komisija je od Njemačke zatražila da joj dostavi informacije.
For the purposes of this Decision, only the EnWG as modified by Article 1 of the Law of 26 July 2011 on the review of provisions governing the energy market (‘the Law of 26 July 2011’) and before the amendments introduced by Article 1 of the Law of 26 July 2016 on the further development of the electricity market (‘EnWG 2011’) is relevant.
DETALJAN OPIS POTPORE
Paragraph 21 of the EnWG 2011 requires that the charges that the network operators charge to their end users are proportionate (‘angemessen’), non-discriminatory, transparent and are calculated on the basis of the costs of an efficient network management.
NAKNADE ZA UPOTREBU MREŽE U NJEMAČKOJ
Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011 empowers the federal government to lay down detailed rules on the methodology for the calculation of network charges by ordinance.
Sustav naknada za upotrebu mreže u Njemačkoj uređen je njemačkim Zakonom o energiji (Energiewirtschaftsgesetz, „EnWG”).
Point 1 of the first sentence of Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011 empowers the federal government to determine the general methodology of calculating network charges.
Za potrebe ove Odluke mjerodavan je samo EnWG kako je izmijenjen člankom 1.
Point 3 of the same sentence empowers the federal government to determine in which cases of atypical network use individual network charges can be approved.
Zakona od 26. srpnja 2011. o reviziji odredbi kojima se uređuje energetsko tržište („Zakon od 26. srpnja 2011.”) i prije izmjena uvedenih člankom 1.
Adopted on the basis of Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011, the Ordinance on Electricity Network Charges (Stromnetzentgeltverordnung, ‘StromNEV’) contains detailed provisions on the determination of network charges.
Zakona od 26. srpnja 2016. o daljnjem razvoju tržišta električne energije („EnWG iz 2011.”)
Paragraph 3(2) of the StromNEV clarifies that network charges are paid for the services provided by the network operator at the network level to which a user is connected as well as all for the use of all upstream network levels.
Člankom 21.
Paragraph 16(1) of the StromNEV establishes the guiding principle according to which network charges need to reflect the costs actually caused by network users.
EnWG-a iz 2011. utvrđeno je da naknade koje mrežni operateri naplaćuju svojim krajnjim korisnicima moraju biti proporcionalne („angemessen”), nediskriminirajuće, transparentne i izračunane na temelju troškova učinkovitog upravljanja mrežom.
Against this background and in line with the empowerment laid down in point 1 of the first sentence of Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011, the StromNEV provides for the general methodology that network operators have to follow for calculating network charges.
Člankom 24.
This calculation methodology is laid down in Paragraphs 4 to 14 of the StromNEV 2011.
EnWG-a iz 2011. savezna vlada ovlašćuje se da pravilnikom utvrdi detaljna pravila o metodologiji izračuna naknada za upotrebu mreže.
This methodology consists of first taking the various annual cost elements of all networks together.
Točkom 1. prve rečenice članka 24.
Those are the construction costs of the electricity network (transmission and distribution lines, substations), the maintenance and the costs for operating the network, including the costs linked to so-called system services (primary, secondary and minute reserves, re-dispatching and electricity to cover network losses).
EnWG-a iz 2011. savezna vlada ovlašćuje se da utvrdi opću metodologiju izračuna naknada za upotrebu mreže.
Their annual amount is calculated based on the profit and loss account of the network operators (Paragraph 4 of the StromNEV 2011).
Točkom 3. iste rečenice savezna vlada ovlašćuje se da utvrdi slučajeve u kojima se mogu odobriti pojedinačne naknade za netipičnu upotrebu mreže.
They include not only material costs and personnel costs but also loan interests (Paragraph 5 of the StromNEV), depreciation (Paragraph 6 of the StromNEV 2011), a remuneration for the network operator's own capital (Paragraph 7 of the StromNEV 2011) and taxes (Paragraph 8 of the StromNEV 2011).
Pravilnik o naknadama za upotrebu elektroenergetske mreže (Stromnetzentgeltverordnung, „StromNEV”), koji je donesen na temelju članka 24.
Revenues like connection costs and subsidies have to be deducted (Paragraph 9 of the StromNEV).
EnWG-a iz 2011., sadržava detaljne odredbe o utvrđivanju naknada za upotrebu mreže.
Metering costs, however, are not included in the network costs and are also subject to separate metering fees.
U članku 3. stavku 2.
The costs linked to the purchase of balancing energy are not included in the network costs as it is invoiced separately to the users responsible for the imbalance.
StromNEV-a pojašnjeno je da se naknade za upotrebu mreže plaćaju za usluge koje mrežni operater pruža na razini mreže na koju je korisnik priključen te za upotrebu svih viših razina mreže.
The total annual costs of the networks are then allocated to the different network and network levels (high voltage, substation levels, medium voltage, low voltage).
Člankom 16. stavkom 1.
Annex 2 of the StromNEV 2011 contains the list of those network levels.
StromNEV-a utvrđeno je vodeće načelo prema kojemu naknade za upotrebu mreže moraju odražavati stvarne troškove koje su prouzročili korisnici mreže.
The next step in the determination of the network charges will be to convert the total annual costs of the networks into the network charges.
U tom kontekstu i u skladu s ovlasti utvrđenoj u točki 1. prve rečenice članka 24.
They are determined top-down for each voltage level (from high voltage to low voltage).
EnWG-a iz 2011.
First the so-called specific annual costs of the high voltage level are determined by dividing the total annual costs of the high voltage level by the annual peak load measured on that high voltage level, as the peak load of the network level is viewed as the main cost determining factor.
StromNEV-om se utvrđuje opća metodologija koje se mrežni operateri moraju pridržavati pri izračunu naknada za upotrebu mreže.
This is expressed in EUR/kW.
Ta metodologija izračuna utvrđena je u člancima od 4. do 14.
Via the ‘simultaneity function’ of each grid level described in recital 14 below, the specific annual costs will be converted into a price per connection capacity, in EUR/kW and into a price per unit of electricity consumed, in EUR/kWh.
StromNEV-a iz 2011.
The same exercise is then done for the next voltage level.
Prvi korak u toj metodologiji jest skupni izračun godišnjeg iznosa različitih elemenata troška svih mreža.
However the total annual costs of the next voltage level will be composed on its own costs and of rolled-over costs from the upstream voltage level.
Riječ je o troškovima izgradnje elektroenergetske mreže (prijenosni i distribucijski vodovi, transformatorske stanice), održavanja i upravljanja mrežom, uključujući troškove povezane s takozvanim uslugama sustava (primarna, sekundarna i minutna rezerva, redispečiranje i električna energija kojom se pokrivaju gubitci u mreži).
The rolled over costs correspond to the total costs of the upstream level minus the network charges obtained from network users (final consumers and electricity suppliers directly connected to that voltage level).
Njihov godišnji iznos računa se na temelju računa dobiti i gubitka mrežnih operatera (članak 4.
The following figure 1 shows the roll-over of costs.
StromNEV-a iz 2011.).
In a network in which electricity flows top-down, network users will thus have to bear the costs of the network level to which they are connected, as well as part of the costs of the upstream networks as those networks are used to transmit the electricity to them as well.
Oni ne uključuju samo materijalne troškove i troškove osoblja, nego i kamate na kredite (članak 5.
Figure 1
StromNEV-a), amortizaciju (članak 6.
Roll-over of network costs for the determination of network charges (1)
StromNEV-a iz 2011.), prinos od vlastitog kapitala mrežnog operatera (članak 7.
In the figure, HS stands for high voltage, MS stands for medium voltage, NS stands for low voltage, HS/MS stands for the substation in which high voltage is transformed to medium voltage, MS/NS stands for the substation converting medium voltage to low voltage.
StromNEV-a iz 2011.) i poreze (članak 8.
Source: Commission based on description provided by Germany and completed with the information contained in Figure 1 of the BNetzA Report ‘Netzentgeltsystematik Elektrizität’ of December 2015 available under https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Energie/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Netzentgelte/Netzentgeltsystematik/Bericht_Netzentgeltsystematik_12-2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.
StromNEV-a iz 2011.).
The simultaneity function referred to above under recital 13 is described in Paragraph 16(2) StromNEV and Annex 4 of StromNEV 2011.
StromNEV-a).
This function attributes to each network user a ‘simultaneity factor’ between 0 and 1.
Troškovi očitavanja brojila nisu uključeni u troškove mreže i za njih postoje zasebne naknade za očitavanje brojila.
The simultaneity factor expresses the probability — based on historical figures — that the electricity consumption of the individual network user in question contributes to the annual peak load of the network level concerned.
Troškovi povezani s kupnjom energije uravnoteženja nisu uključeni u troškove mreže jer se za njih izdaje odvojeni račun korisnicima odgovornima za neravnotežu.
The simultaneous annual peak load of the network is an important cost driver of the network given that this annual peak load is important for the dimensioning of network in which electricity is flowing top-down.
Ukupni godišnji troškovi mreža tada se raspoređuju među različitim mrežama i razinama mreže (visokonaponska, razine transformatorskih stanica, srednjenaponska, niskonaponska).
The idea behind the simultaneity function is that network users which have a higher probability of contributing to the annual peak load will pay a higher capacity tariff.
Prilog 2.
The users of each network level are the final consumers directly connected to the high voltage level as well as downstream network levels.
StromNEV-u iz 2011. sadržava popis tih razina mreže.
The simultaneity factors of all network users of the network level considered are then introduced into a graph on the y-axis and put in correlation with the number of annual hours of full use (x-axis).
Sljedeći korak u utvrđivanju naknada za upotrebu mreže jest pretvorba ukupnih godišnjih troškova mreža u naknade za upotrebu mreže.
This results into the simultaneity function.
One se utvrđuju „odozgo prema dolje” za svaku razinu napona (od visokonaponske do niskonaponske).
This function is linear and continuous but composed of two linear parts which intersect at a kink at 2500 annual usage hours made.
Prvo se utvrđuju takozvani posebni godišnji troškovi visokonaponske razine dijeljenjem ukupnih godišnjih troškova visokonaponske razine s godišnjim vršnim opterećenjem izmjerenim na toj visokonaponskoj razini jer se vršno opterećenje razine mreže smatra glavnih čimbenikom za utvrđivanje troška.
The simultaneity function is then converted into a tariff per connection capacity in EUR/kW and into a tariff per unit of electricity consumed in EUR/kWh.
Ta se vrijednost izražava u EUR/kW.
When establishing the network charges, network operators must also take into account the maximum revenue level allowed for each one of them by the Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur, ‘BNetzA’) (on the maximum revenue level allowed, see also recital 43).
Primjenom „funkcije istodobnosti” svake razine mreže koja je opisana u nastavku u uvodnoj izjavi 14. posebni godišnji troškovi pretvorit će se u cijenu po kapacitetu priključka u EUR/kW i cijenu po jedinici potrošene energije u EUR/kWh.
In practice, this maximum revenue level, which is established by benchmarking with other network operators, will have as consequence that high costs resulting from inefficiencies cannot be recovered through network charges.
Isti izračun obavlja se i za sljedeću razinu napona.
This system aims at improving the efficiency of the network operators.
No ukupni godišnji troškovi sljedeće razine napona sastoje se od vlastitih troškova i troškova prenesenih iz više razine napona.
The methodology described in recitals 11 to 15 above implements the ‘principle of cost-causality’ when determining the network charges for the majority of network users.
Na grafikonu 1. u nastavku nalazi se prikaz prijenosa troškova.
Paragraph 19 of the StromNEV addresses the network charges to be paid in line with the principle of cost-causality by so-called atypical network users, i.e. users with a consumption or load pattern that differs significantly from the consumption or load profile of the other users as provided for in point 3 of the first sentence of Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011.
U mreži u kojoj se električna energija isporučuje „odozgo prema dolje” korisnici mreže morat će snositi troškove razine mreže na koju su priključeni, ali i dio troškova viših razina jer se te razine upotrebljavaju za prijenos električne energije i do njih.
The heading of Paragraph 19 of the StromNEV is ‘atypical network use’.
Grafikon 1.
Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV identifies two groups of atypical network users: Firstly, users whose annual peak load predictably and significantly deviates from the simultaneous annual peak load of all other network users connected to the same network (first sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV).
Prijenos troškova mreže radi utvrđivanja naknada za upotrebu mreže (1)
Typically this concerns network users who are systematically consuming outside peak load times because for instance they are running equipment at night.
Na grafikonu HS označava visoki napon, MS označava srednji napon, NS označava niski napon, HS/MS označava transformatorsku stanicu u kojoj se visoki napon pretvara u srednji napon, MS/NS označava transformatorsku stanicu u kojoj se srednji napon pretvara u niski napon.
This first category of atypical network users is hereinafter designated as ‘non-peak consumers’.
Izvor: Komisija, na temelju opisa koji je dostavila Njemačka i koji je dopunjen informacijama s grafikona 1. iz Izvješća agencije BNetzA „Netzentgeltsystematik Elektrizität” iz prosinca 2015. dostupnoga na https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Energie/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Netzentgelte/Netzentgeltsystematik/Bericht_Netzentgeltsystematik_12-2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1.
Secondly, users with an annual electricity consumption reaching minimum 7000 hours of use and exceeding 10 gigawatt hours (GWh) (second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV).
Kako bi se osiguralo da dodjela različitim korisnicima mreže odražava stvarne troškove pojedinačnog korisnika mreže, kako je utvrđeno člankom 16. stavkom 1.
This second category of atypical network users is hereinafter designated as ‘baseload consumers’.
StromNEV-a, na predmetnu razinu napona primjenjuje se funkcija istodobnosti.
Before the amendment introduced by Article 7 of the Law of 26 July 2011 and described more in detail below in section 2.2, Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV as amended by the Law of 3 September 2010 (‘StromNEV 2010’) stated that both non-peak and baseload consumers were to pay individual network charges as also explicitly provided under the empowerment laid down in point 3 of the first sentence of Paragraph 24 of the EnWG 2011 (see recital 7 above).
Faktor istodobnosti izražava vjerojatnost da potrošnja električne energije predmetnog pojedinog korisnika mreže pridonosi godišnjem vršnom opterećenju predmetne razine mreže na temelju podataka o prošloj potrošnji.
Such individual network charges were to take due account of the consumption pattern of the atypical network user.
Istodobno godišnje vršno opterećenje mreže važan je faktor koji utječe na trošak mreže jer je to godišnje vršno opterećenje važno za projektiranje mreže u kojoj električna energija teče „odozgo prema dolje”.
More precisely, the third sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2010 required that the individual network charge should reflect the contribution of the atypical network user to a reduction of the overall network charges or their contribution to avoiding an increase in network charges.
Funkcija istodobnosti temelji se na konceptu da će korisnici mreže za koje je vjerojatnije da će u većoj mjeri pridonijeti godišnjem vršnom opterećenju plaćati veću naknadu za kapacitet.
To this end, in 2010, the BNetzA published a guidance paper outlining the so-called ‘physical path methodology’ that should be applied to determine the network costs caused by the baseload consumers and thereby their individual network charges.
Korisnici svake razine mreže krajnji su potrošači izravno priključeni na visokonaponsku razinu mreže i niže razine mreže.
The physical path methodology aims at identifying the stand-alone costs of a particular network user.
Faktori istodobnosti svih korisnika mreže na predmetnoj razini mreže potom se unose u grafikon na os y i stavljaju u korelaciju s brojem godišnjih sati maksimalne upotrebe (os x).
It measures the costs of a virtual use of an existing direct line from the consumption site to an adequate generation installation by computing the capital and operational expenditures of the part of the network used to connect the baseload consumer to the closest power plant that can cover the entire needs of the baseload consumer and adding the costs of network services that the baseload consumer has been using, if any.
Na taj način dobiva se funkcija istodobnosti.
The second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2010, however, required both non-peak and baseload consumers to pay a minimum contribution of at least 20 % of the published network charge, that is to say the individual network charge calculated based on the contribution of the atypical network user to a reduction of the overall network charges or their contribution to avoiding an increase in network charges could not be lower than 20 % of the published network charge.
Riječ je o linearnoj i kontinuiranoj funkciji koja se sastoji od dva linearna dijela koja se presijecaju u šiljku na 2500 sati upotrebe godišnje.