natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Eleven Union producers were sampled on the basis of:
Komisija je na temelju te primjedbe 25. rujna 2017. od proizvođača iz Unije zatražila da dostave dodatne informacije o tim razinama kako bi se utvrdio revidirani uzorak proizvođača iz Unije.
the overall representativity in terms of size of the production and sales volume of the product concerned in the year 2016;
Proizvođači iz Unije koji surađuju i koji su odgovorili na upitnik za odabir uzorka uključuju velika te mala i srednja poduzeća („MSP-ovi”) i čine više od 50 % ukupne procijenjene proizvodnje i prodaje u Uniji.
the representativity of tiers in terms of size of the production volume of the product concerned in the year 2016;
Kako bi utvrdila konačni uzorak, Komisija je uzela u obzir podjelu sektora guma na različite razine, osiguravajući time da društva u uzorku obuhvaćaju sve tri razine.
the geographical spread; and
Osim toga, kako bi osigurala da je situacija MSP-ova primjereno prikazana u analizi štete s obzirom na to da oni čine oko 15 % ukupnog obujma prodaje proizvođača iz Unije u Uniji, Komisija je smatrala da bi i MSP-ovi trebali biti zastupljeni u uzorku.
the representativity of the Union producers in terms of size, namely between SMEs and larger companies.
Jedanaest proizvođača iz Unije odabrana su u uzorak na temelju:
The sampled Union producers comprise both large companies and SMEs.
ukupne reprezentativnosti u smislu veličine obujma proizvodnje i prodaje predmetnog proizvoda 2016.,
The selected Union producers were based in six Member States which together accounted for more than 36 % of Union production and sales reported by the cooperating Union producers.
reprezentativnosti razina u smislu veličine obujma proizvodnje predmetnog proizvoda 2016.,
On 22 December 2017, one of the sampled Union producers, the Polish producer, Geyer & Hosaja, informed the Commission that it had decided to stop cooperating with the investigation.
geografske pokrivenosti, i
The percentages mentioned in recital (30) above are not impacted by the withdrawal of this producer as its production represents less than 0,1 % of the total Union production.
reprezentativnosti proizvođača iz Unije u smislu veličine, odnosno MSP-ova i većih društava.
The Commission therefore concluded that the final sample remains representative of the Union industry.
Proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku sastoje se od velikih društava i MSP-ova.
Finally, the Giti Group submitted that the Commission should have terminated this investigation immediately because of the procedurally erroneous pre-selection of the sample of Union producers.
Odabrani proizvođači iz Unije imaju sjedište u šest država članica te su zajedno činili više od 36 % ukupne proizvodnje i prodaje u Uniji, kako su prijavili proizvođači iz Unije koji surađuju.
The Commission recalled that the provisional selection of a sample of Union producers is legally possible and conducive to an effective investigation within tight deadlines.
Jedan od proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku, poljski proizvođač Geyer & Hosaja, obavijestio je Komisiju 22. prosinca 2017. o tome da je odlučio prekinuti suradnju u ispitnom postupku.
As demonstrated in recitals (26) to (30), the provisional sample was changed further to comments from interested parties.
Povlačenje tog proizvođača ne utječe na postotke navedene u prethodnoj uvodnoj izjavi 30. jer njegova proizvodnja čini manje od 0,1 % ukupne proizvodnje u Uniji.
Consequently, the claim was rejected.
Komisija je stoga zaključila da je konačni uzorak i dalje reprezentativan za industriju Unije.
Importers
Konačno, Grupa Giti navela je da je Komisija odmah trebala prekinuti predmetni ispitni postupak zbog pogrešaka u postupku prethodnog odabira uzorka proizvođača iz Unije.
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked unrelated importers to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Komisija je podsjetila da je pravno moguće odabrati privremeni uzorak proizvođača iz Unije i da to dovodi do učinkovitog ispitnog postupka unutar kratkih rokova.
Five importers came forward importing around 430000 units of imports from the PRC.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnim izjavama od 26. do 30., privremeni uzorak promijenjen je na temelju primjedbi zainteresiranih strana.
Two companies were sampled accounting for [70 % - 90 %] of the importers that submitted a sampling form.
Posljedično, ta je tvrdnja odbačena.
Exporting producers
Uvoznici
In order to decide whether sampling was necessary and, if so, to select a sample, the Commission asked all exporting producers in the PRC to provide the information specified in the Notice of Initiation.
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od nepovezanih uvoznika zatražila da dostave informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
In addition, it requested the authorities of the PRC to identify and/or contact other exporting producers, if any, that could be interested in participating in the investigation.
Javilo se pet uvoznika koji uvoze oko 430000 jedinica uvoza iz NRK-a.
44 exporting producers/group(s) of exporting producers in the country concerned provided the requested information and agreed to be included in the sample.
U uzorak su odabrana dva društva koja čine [70 %–90 %] uvoznika koji su dostavili obrazac za odabir uzorka.
In accordance with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation, the Commission selected the following sample of four groups of exporting producers on the basis of the largest representative volume of exports to the Union which could reasonably be investigated within the time available:
Proizvođači izvoznici
China National Tire Group, China;
Kako bi odlučila je li odabir uzorka potreban i, ako jest, kako bi odabrala uzorak, Komisija je od svih proizvođača izvoznika iz NRK-a zatražila da dostave informacije navedene u Obavijesti o pokretanju postupka.
Giti Group, China;
Osim toga, zatražila je od nadležnih tijela NRK-a da utvrde ostale proizvođače izvoznike, ako takvi postoje, koji bi mogli biti zainteresirani za sudjelovanje u ispitnom postupku i/ili da s njima stupe u kontakt.
Hankook Group, China;
Ukupno je 44 proizvođača izvoznika/grupa proizvođača izvoznika u predmetnoj zemlji dostavilo zatražene informacije i pristalo da ih se uključi u uzorak.
Xingyuan Group, China.
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1. točkom (b) osnovne uredbe Komisija je odabrala sljedeći uzorak od četiriju grupa proizvođača izvoznika na temelju najvećeg reprezentativnog obujma izvoza u Uniju koji bi se razumno mogao ispitati u raspoloživom vremenu:
The sampled groups of exporting producers represented more than 50 % of the total imports of the product concerned to the Union.
Grupa China National Tire, Kina,
In accordance with Article 27(2) of the basic Regulation, all known exporting producers concerned, and the GOC, were consulted on the selection of the sample.
Giti Group, Kina,
Comments on the proposed sample were received from the European Retreading Association (‘BIPAVER’), which claimed that the finally selected sample could lead to a strong imbalance in the product mix between tier 2 and tier 3 tyres.
Hankook Group, Kina,
In their view, the average import prices might not accurately reflect the part of import volumes that are most harmful to the Union industry.
Xingyuan Group, Kina.
Therefore, they urged the Commission to reassess and amend the sample.
Grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku činile su više od 50 % ukupnog uvoza predmetnog proizvoda u Uniju.
The Commission assessed whether it would be practically feasible to further enlarge the sample.
U skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 2. osnovne uredbe provedeno je savjetovanje o odabiru uzorka sa svim poznatim proizvođačima izvoznicima na koje se postupak odnosi te s kineskom vladom.
It pointed out that the groups of exporting producers selected in the sample consisted of: (1) 13 legal entities that were involved in the production and domestic sales of the product concerned; (2) two related exporters located outside of the Union; and (3) more than ten related importers located in the Union.
Zaprimljene su primjedbe Europskog udruženja proizvođača protektiranih guma („BIPAVER”), koje je tvrdilo da konačno odabrani uzorak može prouzročiti velike neravnoteže u ponudi proizvoda između guma 2. i 3. razine.
The data provided by each of these entities needed to be processed and verified.
Smatrali su da se u prosječnim uvoznim cijenama ne mora točno odražavati dio obujmova uvoza koji su najštetniji za industriju Unije.
Therefore, the Commission considered that more exporting producers could not be reasonably investigated within the time available.
Stoga su od Komisije zatražili da ponovno procijeni i izmijeni uzorak.
BIPAVER also considered that two of the sampled companies were not representative recipients of countervailable subsidies because they have their headquarters and some production facilities outside of the PRC.
Komisija je procijenila bi li se dodatno povećanje uzorka moglo provesti u praksi.
The Commission noted that the fact that an individual company might not have received directly a specific type of alleged subsidy did not render the sample non-representative, as the purpose of the sample was to represent the overall tyres industry in the PRC with regard to eligibility for all types of alleged subsidies.
Istaknula je da se grupe proizvođača izvoznika odabrane u uzorku sastoje od: 1.
The four sampled groups of exporting producers were representative in terms of eligibility for the subsidies alleged in the complaint.
13 pravnih subjekata uključenih u proizvodnju i domaću prodaju predmetnog proizvoda; 2. dvaju povezanih izvoznika sa sjedištem izvan Unije; i 3. više od deset povezanih uvoznika sa sjedištem u Uniji.
Hence, the Commission considered that the selected sample represents a proper basis to examine the existence and the extent of the alleged subsidisation.
Bilo je potrebno obraditi i provjeriti podatke koje je dostavio svaki od tih subjekata.
The proposed sample hence complies with Article 27(1)(b) of the basic Regulation.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da u raspoloživom vremenu ne bi mogla u razumnoj mjeri ispitati veći broj proizvođača izvoznika.
The Commission therefore decided to retain the proposed sample as the final sample.
BIPAVER je smatrao i da dva društva u uzorku nisu reprezentativni primatelji subvencija protiv kojih se mogu uvesti kompenzacijske mjere jer im se sjedišta i dio proizvodnih postrojenja nalaze izvan NRK-a.
In addition to the four sampled exporting producers, six exporting producers declared that, in the event that they are not selected to be in the sample, they would like to receive a questionnaire and other claim forms in order to claim an individual examination under Article 27(3) of the basic Regulation.
Komisija je napomenula da činjenica da pojedinačno društvo možda nije izravno dobilo posebnu vrstu navodne subvencije ne čini uzorak nereprezentativnim jer je svrha uzorka predstavljati cjelokupnu industriju guma u NRK-u s obzirom na prihvatljivost za sve vrste navodnih subvencija.
As requested, the Commission sent questionnaires to these six exporting producers.
Četiri grupe proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku bile su reprezentativne u smislu prihvatljivosti za subvencije navedene u pritužbi.
However, none of them replied to the questionnaire.
Stoga je Komisija smatrala da odabrani uzorak predstavlja odgovarajuću osnovu za ispitivanje postojanja i opsega navodnog subvencioniranja.
Questionnaire replies and verification visits
Predloženi uzorak stoga je u skladu s člankom 27. stavkom 1. točkom (b) osnovne uredbe.
The Commission sent questionnaires to the four sampled Chinese exporting producers; the non-sampled exporting producers as well as the sampled Union producers.
Komisija je stoga odlučila zadržati predloženi uzorak kao konačni uzorak.
Questionnaire replies were received from the four sampled Chinese exporting producers and from ten sampled Union producers.
Osim tih četiriju proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, šest je proizvođača izvoznika izjavilo da bi, ako ne budu odabrani u uzorak, željeli primiti upitnik i druge obrasce zahtjeva kako bi podnijeli zahtjev za pojedinačno ispitivanje na temelju članka 27. stavka 3. osnovne uredbe.
None of the non-sampled exporting producers sent a reply to the questionnaires.
U skladu sa zahtjevom Komisija je poslala upitnike na adrese tih šest proizvođača izvoznika.
A questionnaire was also sent to the GOC.
Međutim, nijedan od njih nije odgovorio na te upitnike.
It included specific questionnaires for the China Development Bank (‘CDB’), Export Import Bank of China (‘EXIM’), Agricultural Bank of China (‘ABC’), Bank of China (‘BOC’), and the Chinese Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (‘Sinosure’).
Odgovori na upitnik i posjeti radi provjere
Those financial institutions had been specifically referred to in the complaint as public bodies or bodies directed and entrusted granting subsidies.
Komisija je poslala upitnike na adrese četiriju kineskih proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku, proizvođača izvoznika koji nisu odabrani u uzorak te proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward the specific questionnaire for financial institutions to any other financial institution that provided loans or export credits to the sampled companies, or to the buyers of the sampled companies.
Odgovore na upitnik dostavili su četiri kineska proizvođača izvoznika u uzorku i deset proizvođača iz Unije u uzorku.
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these financial institutions and to send them directly to the Commission.
Nijedan od proizvođača izvoznika koji nisu odabrani u uzorak nije poslao odgovor na upitnike.
Furthermore, the questionnaire for the GOC included specific questionnaires for those producers of natural rubber, synthetic rubber, carbon black and nylon cord which, according to the complaint, provided inputs at less than adequate remuneration to the sampled companies, i.e. Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd and Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
Upitnik je poslan i kineskoj vladi.
In addition, the GOC was asked to forward that specific questionnaire to all other producers and distributors of the raw materials in question which had provided inputs to the sampled companies.
Obuhvaćao je posebne upitnike za Kinesku razvojnu banku („CDB”), Kinesku izvozno-uvoznu banku („EXIM”), Poljoprivrednu banku Kine („ABC”), Banku Kine („BOC”) te Kinesko društvo za osiguranje izvoza i kredita („Sinosure”).
The GOC was also asked to gather any responses provided by these producers and to send them directly to the Commission.
Te financijske institucije posebno su navedene u pritužbi kao javna tijela ili tijela koja upravljaju dodjelom subvencija i nadležna su za nju.
The Commission received questionnaire replies from the GOC, which included replies to the specific questionnaire from EXIM, BOC, ABC and Sinosure.
Osim toga, kineska vlada pozvana je da taj posebni upitnik za financijske institucije proslijedi svim drugim financijskim institucijama koje su davale kredite ili izvozne kredite društvima u uzorku ili kupcima društava u uzorku.
The Commission sought and verified all information deemed necessary for the determination of subsidy, injury and Union interest.
Od kineske vlade zatraženo je i da prikupi sve odgovore koje te financijske institucije dostave te da ih izravno pošalje Komisiji.
A verification visit took place at the premises of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, during which officials from other relevant ministries also participated.
Nadalje, upitnik za kinesku vladu obuhvaćao je posebne upitnike za one proizvođače prirodnog kaučuka, sintetičkog kaučuka, ugljene čađe i najlonske kordne niti koji su, prema navodima iz pritužbe, društva u uzorku opskrbljivali ulaznim materijalima uz neprimjereno nisku naknadu, tj. za društva Sinopec, Sinopec Baling Co., Chemchina, Shandong Haohua, Jiangxi Blackcat Carbon Black Co., Ltd, Hangzhou Zhongce Qingquan Industrial Co., Ltd i Suqian Junma Tyre Cord Company Limited.
Moreover, representatives from the following financial institutions were present during this verification visit;
Osim toga, od kineske vlade zatraženo je da taj posebni upitnik proslijedi svim ostalim proizvođačima i distributerima predmetnih sirovina koji su društva u uzorku opskrbljivali ulaznim materijalima.
Export Import Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Od kineske vlade zatraženo je i da prikupi sve odgovore koje ti proizvođači dostave te da ih izravno pošalje Komisiji.
Agricultural Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Komisija je od kineske vlade primila odgovore na upitnik koji su uključivali odgovore na posebni upitnik dobivene od EXIM-a, BOC-a, ABC-a i društva Sinosure.
Bank of China, Beijing, China;
Komisija je zatražila i provjerila sve informacije koje je smatrala neophodnima za utvrđivanje subvencije, štete i interesa Unije.
Sinosure, Beijing, China.
U prostorima kineskog ministarstva trgovine obavljen je posjet radi provjere tijekom kojeg su sudjelovali i dužnosnici drugih relevantnih ministarstava.
Moreover, verification visits pursuant to Article 26 of the basic Regulation were carried out at the premises of the following companies:
Osim toga, tijekom tog posjeta radi provjere bili su prisutni i predstavnici sljedećih financijskih institucija:
Sampled Union producers
Kineska izvozno-uvozna banka, Peking, Kina,
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poland;
Poljoprivredna banka Kine, Peking, Kina,
Wetest, Czech Republic;
Banka Kine, Peking, Kina,
Pneumatici, Italy;
Sinosure, Peking, Kina.
Banden plant, the Netherlands;
Osim toga, posjeti radi provjere u skladu s člankom 26. osnovne uredbe obavljeni su u prostorima sljedećih društava:
Marangoni SpA Ltd Italy;
proizvođači iz Unije u uzorku
Roline N.V., the Netherlands;
Good Year Firma Oponiarska, Poljska,
four Union producers which requested confidentiality.
Wetest, Češka,
Sampled unrelated importers in the Union
Pneumatici, Italija,
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, the Netherlands;
postrojenje Banden, Nizozemska,
Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Germany.
Marangoni SpA Ltd.
Sampled producers in the PRC
Italija,
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Roline N.V., Nizozemska,
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Beijing, PRC;
četiri proizvođača iz Unije koja su zatražila povjerljivost;
Chemchina Corporation, Beijing, PRC;
nepovezani uvoznici iz Unije u uzorku
Chemchina Finance, Beijing, PRC;
Heuver Bandengroothandel B.V, Nizozemska,
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
društvo Hämmerling The Tyre Company GmbH, Njemačka;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd, Taiyuan, PRC;
proizvođači iz NRK-a u uzorku
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd, Beijing, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, NRK,
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd, Jiaozuo, PRC;
Beijing Rubber Research and Design Institute, Peking, NRK,
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd:, Jining, PRC;
Chemchina Corporation, Peking, NRK,
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC;
Chemchina Finance, Peking, NRK,
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd., Peking, NRK,
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd, Qingdao, PRC;
Aeolus Tyre (Taiyuan) Co. Ltd., Taiyuan, NRK,
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd, Jining, PRC.
Chonche Auto Repair Group Co. Ltd., Peking, NRK,
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Shanghai, PRC;
Henan Tyre Group Co. Ltd., Jiaozuo, NRK,
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Yanzhou Ruiyuan Rubber Plastic Co. Ltd.:, Jining, NRK,
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
Yinhe Power Plant Co. Ltd., Jining, NRK,
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd, Hefei, PRC;
QingdaoYellow Sea (Rubber) Group Co. Ltd., Qingdao, NRK,
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd, Hualin, PRC;
Qingdao Yellow Sea Rubber Co. Ltd., Qingdao, NRK,
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd, Fujian, PRC;
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd., Jining, NRK;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
Giti Tire (China) Investment Co., Šangaj, NRK,
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd, Yinchuan, PRC;
Giti Tire (Anhui) Co. Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
GITI Radial Tire (Anhui) Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd, Hubei, PRC;
Anhui Prime Cord Fabrics Company Ltd., Hefei, NRK,
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
Giti Tire (Hualin) Co. Ltd., Hualin, NRK,
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd, Shanghai, PRC.
Giti Tire (Fujian) Co. Ltd., Fujian, NRK,
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd, Shanghai, PRC;
GITI Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, NRK,
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Chongqing, PRC;
GITI Greatwall Tire (Yinchuan) Co. Ltd., Yinchuan, NRK,
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd, Jiangsu, PRC;
GITI Tyre (Chongqing) Company Ltd., Chongqing, NRK,
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
GITI Steel Cord (Hubei) Company Ltd., Hubei, NRK,
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Engineering Shanghai Company Ltd., Šangaj, NRK,
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd, Dongying, PRC;
Seyen Machinery (Shanghai) Company Ltd., Šangaj, NRK;
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd, Dongying, PRC.
Shanghai Hankook Tire Sales Co. Ltd., Šangaj, NRK,
Non-imposition of provisional measures and subsequent procedure
Chongqing Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Chongqing, NRK,
Given that it had imposed provisional measures in the parallel anti-dumping case in May 2018, the Commission decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case.
Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co. Ltd., Jiangsu, NRK;
On 13 July 2018, all interested parties received an Information Document describing the Commission's preliminary findings on the alleged subsidy schemes and the Commission's preliminary conclusions as far as injury, causation and Union interest were concerned, as set out in the provisional anti-dumping Regulation.
Xingyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
Several interested parties made written submissions on the information document.
Guangrao Xinhongyuan Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
The parties who so requested were granted an opportunity to be heard.
Xingyuan International Tyre Co. Ltd., Dongying, NRK,
Following the disclosure of the Information Document, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd claimed that it should not be considered as a related company of China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd (‘CNRC’).
Guangda Tyre Co Ltd., Dongying, NRK.
In this sense, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd disagreed with the application of Article 127 of the Union Customs Code Implementing Act (EU) 2015/2447 (the ‘Union Customs Code’) for the purpose of calculating a weighted average amount of subsidisation for related companies.
Neuvođenje privremenih mjera i daljnji postupak
Instead, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd referred to the definition of Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement, which requires control of one company over another, in order to establish the relation between companies.
Budući da je u svibnju 2018. uvela privremene mjere dok je trajao usporedni antidampinški predmet, Komisija je u ovom predmetu odlučila da neće uvesti privremene mjere.
Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd then argued that Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd would not qualify as a related company under this standard, as it was allegedly not controlled by CNRC.
Sve zainteresirane strane primile su 13. srpnja 2018. dokument s informacijama u kojem su navedeni preliminarni nalazi Komisije o navodnim programima subvencija i preliminarni zaključci Komisije u pogledu štete, uzročnosti i interesa Unije, kako je utvrđeno u Privremenoj antidampinškoj uredbi.
In addition, Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd noted that the basic Regulation did not make any reference to the Union Customs Code.
Nekoliko zainteresiranih strana dostavilo je pisane podneske o dokumentu s informacijama.
The Commission recalled that Article 16 of the ASCM Agreement is mirrored in Article 9(2) of the basic Regulation.
Stranama koje su to zatražile omogućeno je da budu saslušane.
However, both articles refer only to the definition of the Union industry and the relationship of Union producers to exporting producers.
Nakon objave dokumenta s informacijama društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. tvrdilo je da ga ne bi trebalo smatrati povezanim društvom društva China National Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. („CNRC”).
In that context, a Union producer may be taken from the definition of the Union industry if it is controlled by an exporting producer.
U tom se smislu društvo Pirelli Tyre Co. Ltd. nije složilo s primjenom članka 127.