natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On the basis of these reasonable profit levels the Commission concluded that bpost had been overcompensated which led to the recovery of EUR 417 million (see http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-45_en.htm).
Anonimna osoba upućuje i da je povećanje područja primjene obveze pružanja univerzalne usluge u Zakonu o pošti iz 2010. na pakete do 20 kg naznaka interesa društva Correos da proširi svoje poslovanje kako bi se, zahvaljujući svojem položaju pružatelja univerzalne usluge, moglo natjecati na tržištu s ostalim trgovačkim društvima koje pružaju usluge dostave paketa na španjolskom tržištu usluga dostave paketa.
Given that the comments of the Spanish State and Correos are very convergent, the Commission will refer to comments made by the Spanish authorities and/or Correos in the following of the document.
Komisija će naknadu za obvezu pružanja univerzalne usluge društvu Correos u skladu sa Zakonom o pošti iz 2010. procijeniti u drugoj odluci (vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 32.).
In most cases, the same comment is made by both parties.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH i Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg protiv Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
In some cases, it is only made by one of them.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije 2009/554/EZ od 21. listopada 2008. u predmetu SA.20461 (C49/2006(ex NN 65/06)) – Poste Italiane (SL L 189, 21.7.2009., str. 3.).
Communication from the Commission: European framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (2005) (OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4).
Predmet T-613/97, Ufex i ostali protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:T:2006:150.
See in particular Decision 2012/321/EU and Decision 2012/636/EU.
Komisija ga je objavila 18. veljače 2013. (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/new_guide_eu_rules_procurement_en.pdf).
See footnote 2 of paragraph 21 of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
Odluka Komisije 2012/321/EU od 25. siječnja 2012. o mjeri SA.14588(C20/2009) koju je provela Belgija u korist društva De Post – La Poste (sada bpost) (SL L 170, 29.6.2012., str. 1.).
This cost allocation methodology is described in paragraphs 28 et seq. of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
Vidjeti, primjerice, Odluku Komisije od 28. ožujka 2012. u predmetu SA.33054 (2012/N) – Naknada za neto troškove nastale radi zadržavanja mreže koja nije tržišno održiva u razdoblju od 2012. do 2015. i nastavak instrumenta radnog kapitala (SL C 121, 26.4.2012., str. 1.), i Odluku Komisije 2012/636/EU od 25. siječnja 2012. o mjeri C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) koju je provela Njemačka za društvo Deutsche Post AG (SL L 289, 19.10.2012., str. 1.).
As for example described in the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Postal Services Directive and in particular the Annex on the calculation of the net cost of the postal universal service obligation.
Presuda Suda od 3. srpnja 2003., spojeni predmeti C-83/01 P, C-93/01 P i C-94/01 P, Chronopost/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2003:388.
Further guidance can be found in the Commission's State aid decision practice since 2012.
Presuda Suda od 1. srpnja 2008., spojeni predmeti C-341/-06 P, C-342/01 P i C-342/06P, Chronopost i La Poste/UFEX i ostali, ECLI:EU:C2008:375.
See for example Commission Decision of 4 December 2015 in case SA.43243 (2015/N) — State compensations granted to Poste Italiane SpA for the delivery of the universal postal service over the periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019 (OJ C 104, 18.3.2016, p. 1)., Commission Decision of 1 August 2014 in Case SA.35608 (2014/C) implemented by Greece in favour of Hellenic Post (ELTA) (OJ C 348, 3.10.2014, p. 48).
Odluka Komisije 98/365/EZ od 1. listopada 1997. od navodnoj državnoj potpori koju je Francuska dodijelila društvu SMFI-Chronopost (SL L 164, 9.6.1998., str. 37.).
Commission Decision of 5 August 2016 in case SA.38869 (2014/N) Compensation of Poczta Polska for the net cost of USO 2013-2015 (OJ C 284, 5.8.2016, p. 1).
Povjerljive informacije.
Case C-471/09 P Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2011:521, paragraph 65.
Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia: CNMC će donijeti odluke kada budu utvrđeni neto trošak pružanja univerzalne poštanske usluge i nepošteno opterećenjeza te različite godine.
Press releases, publication of decisions on its website.
C-460/07, Sandra Puffer protiv Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Linz, ECLI:EU:C:2009:254.
See footnote 53.
Odluka Komisije 2011/3/EU od 24. veljače 2010. o ugovorima o javnim uslugama prijevoza između danskog ministarstva prometa i Danske Statsbaner (Državna potpora C 41/08 (ex NN 35/08)) (SL L 7, 11.1.2011., str. 1.).
E.g.
Prema metodologiji raspodjele troškova neto trošak obveze pružanja javne usluge kao što je USO razlika je između nastalih troškova i prihoda ostvarenih izvršavanjem obveze pružanja javne usluge.
Hellenic Post, Poste Italiane.
U skladu s metodologijom raspodjele troškova, tom neto trošku može se dodati razumna dobit kako bi se izračunao najveći iznos dopuštene naknade.
See Commission Decision of 20 November 2012 in Case SA.33989 (2012/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Poste Italiane (OJ C 77, 15.3.2013, p. 12) and Commission Decision in Case SA.35608 (2014/C) implemented by Greece in favour of Hellenic Post (ELTA).
Povrat na prodaju je mjera profitabilnosti koja se naziva još i marža operativne dobiti.
See paragraph 50 of the Commission Decision in Case SA.33989 (2012/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Poste Italiane.
Izračunava se kao omjer između neto operativne dobiti (prije kamata i poreza) i prihoda od prodaje.
Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities EU:C:1980:209, paragraph 11; and Joined cases T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 to 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 to T-6/98 and T-23/98 Alzetta Mauro and others v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:2000:151, paragraph 80.
Drugim riječima, neto operativna dobit je razlika između prihoda i troškova na operativnoj razini.
Case 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities, EU:C:1980:209 paragraphs 11 and 12; and Case T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities EU:T:1998:77, paragraphs 48-50.
Predmet T-358/94 Compagnie nationale Air France protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:1996:194, točka 56.
Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9).
Predmet 248/84 Savezna Republika Njemačka protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:1987:437, točka 17.; i spojeni predmeti T-92/00 i T-103/00 Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava (T-92/00), Ramondín, SA i Ramondín Cápsulas, SA (T-103/00) protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:2002:61, točka 57.
Case C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances EU:C:1994:311, paragraphs 28 and 35.
Spojeni predmeti C-180/98 to C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov i ostali protiv Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
See Joined Cases T-195/01 and T-207/01 Government of Gibraltar v Commission EU:T:2002:111, paragraph 111.
Predmet C-41/90 Höfner & Fritz Elser protiv Macrotron GmbH EU:C:1991:161, točka 21. i spojeni predmeti od C-180/98 do C-184/98 Pavel Pavlov i ostali protiv Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten EU:C:2000:428, točka 74.
According to article 4 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1), modifications of a purely formal or administrative nature which cannot affect the evaluation of the compatibility of the aid measure with the common market as well as an increase in the original budget of an existing aid scheme by up to 20 % shall not be considered an alteration to existing aid.
Predmet C-118/85 Komisija Europskih zajednica protiv Talijanske Republike EU:C:1987:283, točka 7.
For example, if the USO services were loss making but overall the company was profit making, no compensation was to be granted while some could be granted after the change.
Predmet C-82/01 P Aéroports de Pariz protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:2002:617, točka 74.; i predmet C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) protiv Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, točka 25.
Alternatively, if the company would be loss-making overall with a very profitable USO, it could receive compensation.
Vidjeti i Komunikaciju Komisije o primjeni pravila o državnim potporama Europske unije na naknadu koja se dodjeljuje za obavljanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa, (2012/C 8/02), točka 9.
Decision 2012/21/EU.
Predmet C-49/07 Motosykletistiki Omospondia Ellados NPID (MOTOE) protiv Elliniko Dimosio EU:C:2008:376, točka 27.; i predmet C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurance, Société Paternelle-Vie, Union des Assurances de Pariz-Vie i Caisse d'Assurance et de Prévoyance Mutuelle des Agriculteurs protiv Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche EU:C:1995:392, točka 21.
Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, (OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4).
Predmet C-39/94 Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) i ostali protiv La Poste i ostali EU:C:1996:285, točka 60. i predmet C-342/96 Kraljevina Španjolska protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1999:210, točka 41.
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67).
Predmet C-173/73 Talijanska Republika protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1974:71, točka 13.
See paragraph 11 of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
Vidjeti točke od 71. do 82.
See recital 28.
Odluke o pokretanju postupka iz 2016.
The provision could apply to a measure starting in the past and still ongoing.
Vidjeti uvodne izjave od 296. do 320.
In such case, a modification or even termination of the entrustment could possibly be requested.
Odluke 2012/321/EU.
See for example La Poste (France), Poste Italiane (Italy) and ELTA (Greece): all 15 years.
U slučaju bposta primijenjena je razumna razina dobiti od 4,8 % za 2004. i 2005. godinu i od 7,4 % ROS za godine od 2006. do 2010.
Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings (OJ L 318, 17.11.2006, p.17).
Na temelju tih razumnih razina dobiti Komisija je zaključila da je društvu bpost isplaćena prekomjerna naknada na temelju čega je izvršen povrat 417 milijuna EUR (vidjeti http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-12-45_en.htm)
See paragraph 31 of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
Budući da su primjedbe Španjolske i društva Correos slične, Komisija će dalje u dokumentu upućivati na primjedbe španjolskih nadležnih tijela i/ili društva Correos.
See paragraph 44 of the 2012 SGEI Framework.
U većini slučajeva obje strane iznijele su istu primjedbu.
See footnote 31.
U nekim slučajevima primjedbu je dala samo jedna strana.
Even if dividends were taken into account in that case, the Commission also indicated in paragraph 345 of the decision, the Commission notably indicated that ‘dividend policy cannot be equated with a refund clause which makes it possible to adjust compensation for the fulfilment of a public service obligation and to prevent overcompensation.’
Komunikacija Komisije: Okvir Europske unije za državne potpore u obliku naknade za javne usluge (2005.)
The Spanish authorities have indicated their intention to request a fiscal adjustment for the calculation of the recovery amount.
(SL C 297, 29.11.2005., str. 4.).
Notice from the Commission — Towards an effective implementation of Commission decisions ordering Member States to recover unlawful and incompatible State aid, OJ C 272, 15.11.2007, p. 4–17
Vidjeti posebno Odluku 2012/321/EU i Odluku 2012/636/EU.
Case C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, EU:C:1994:100, paragraph 14.
Vidjeti presudu Suda od 22. prosinca 2008., British Aggregates protiv Komisije, C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757, točku 111.
Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 1996, Air France v Commission, T-358/94, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, paragraph 62.
Kako je, primjerice, opisano u Radnom dokumentu službi Komisije uz Izvješće Komisije Europskom parlamentu i Vijeću o primjeni Direktive o poštanskim uslugama, a posebno u Prilogu o izračunu neto troška obveze pružanja univerzalne usluge.
Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans EU:C:2003:415, paragraph 84.
Dodatne smjernice dostupne su u Komisijinoj praksi odluka o državnim potporama od 2012.
Case 30/59 De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community EU:C:1961:2, p. 19; and Case C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline EU:C:2001:598, paragraph 38.
Predmet C-471/09 P Diputación Foral de Vizcaya i ostali protiv Komisije, ECLI:EU:C:2011:521, točka 65.
Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, Paint Graphos and others EU:C:2011:550, paras 49 et seq.
Priopćenja za tisak, objava odluka na njezinu web-mjestu.
See Case C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline EU:C:2001:598.
Vidjeti bilješku 53.
Cases T-211/04 and T-215/04, Commission and Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom EU:T:2008:595, para 80.
Npr.
Administrative concession over the property itself or over the public services for which the property is used, right in rem to a tenancy, right in rem to usufruct and right of ownership.
Hellenic Post, Poste Italiane.
See, inter alia, case C-88/03 Portugal v. Commission EU:C:2006:511, paragraph 56; Joined cases C-78/08 to C-80/08 Paint Graphos EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 49.
Vidjeti Odluku Komisije od 20. studenoga 2012. u predmetu SA.33989 (2012/NN) koju je provela Italija u korist društva Poste Italiane (SL C 77, 15.3.2013., str. 12.) i Odluku Komisije u predmetu SA.35608 (2014/C) koju je provela Grčka u korist društva Hellenic Post (ELTA).
See, inter alia, case C-88/03 Portugal v. Commission EU:C:2006:511, paragraph 56; joined cases C-78/08 to C-80/08 Paint Graphos, EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 49.
Vidjeti stavak 50.
The exceptions provided for in Article 107(2) of the Treaty concern: (a) aid of a social character granted to individual consumers; (b) aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences; and (c) aid granted to certain areas of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Odluke Komisije u predmetu SA.33989 (2012/NN) koju je Italija provela u korist društva Poste Italiane.
The exceptions provided for in Article 107(3) of the Treaty concern: (a) aid to promote the development of certain areas; (b) aid for certain important projects of common European interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of the Member State; (c) aid to develop certain economic activities or areas; (d) aid to promote culture and heritage conservation; and (e) aid specified by a Council decision
Predmet 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:C:1980:209, točka 11.; i spojeni predmeti T-298/97, T-312/97, T-313/97, T-315/97, T-600/97 do 607/97, T-1/98, T-3/98 do T-6/98 i T-23/98 Alzetta Mauro i ostali protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:2000:151, točka 80.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy EU:C:1987:283, paragraphs 7 and 8.
Predmet 730/79 Philip Morris Holland BV protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica, EU:C:1980:209 točke 11. i 12. i predmet T-214/95 Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flamanska regija) protiv Komisije Europskih zajednica EU:T:1998:77, točke 48. – 50.
Case C-30/87 Bodson EU:C:1988:225, paragraph 18.
Uredba Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 od 13. srpnja 2015. o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila primjene članka 108.
See, in particular, Case C-364/92 SAT EU:C:1994:7, paragraph 30 and Case C-343/95 Calì & Figli EU:C:1997:160, paragraphs 22 to 23.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 248, 24.9.2015., str. 9.).
See Commission Decision in Case SA.33989 (2012/NN) implemented by Italy in favour of Poste Italiane.
Predmet C-44/93 Namur-Les Assurances EU:C:1994:311, točke 28. i 35.
Indeed, according to paragraph 13 of the Commission's SGEI Communication: ‘[t]he decision of an authority not to allow third parties to provide a certain service (for example, because it wishes to provide the service in-house) does not rule out the existence of an economic activity’.
Vidjeti spojene predmete T-195/01 i T-207/01 Vlada Gibraltara protiv Komisije EU:T:2002:111, točka 111.
See Case C-70/72 Commission v Germany [1973] ECR 813, paragraph 13.
Uredbe Komisije (EZ) br. 794/2004 od 21. travnja 2004. o provedbi Uredbe Vijeća (EU) 2015/1589 o utvrđivanju detaljnih pravila za primjenu članka 108.
See Joined Cases C-278/92, C-279/92 and C-280/92 Spain v Commission [1994] ECR I-4103, paragraph 75.
Ugovora o funkcioniranju Europske unije (SL L 140, 30.4.2004., str. 1.), izmjene formalne ili administrativne prirode koje ne mogu utjecati na evaluaciju spojivosti mjere potpore sa zajedničkim tržištem i povećanje izvornog proračuna postojeće mjere potpore za do 20 % ne smatraju se izmjenom postojeće potpore.
See Case C-75/97 Belgium v Commission [1999] ECR I-030671 paragraphs 64 and 65.
Na primjer, ako se uslugama obuhvaćenima obvezom univerzalne usluge ostvaruju gubici, ali trgovačko društvo ostvaruje dobit, nije se odobravala naknada, dok se nakon izmjene može dodijeliti nekakva naknada.
CORREOS
S druge strane, trgovačko društvo moglo bi dobiti naknadu ako bi općenito ostvarivalo gubitke iako je obveza pružanja univerzalne usluge profitabilna.
Correos is the largest provider of postal services in Spain, with 8787 postal points of contact in 2016.
Odluka 2012/21/EU.
It is the market leader in the Spanish postal sector with the biggest market share of the Spanish postal services market, except in parcel services.
Okvir Zajednice za državnu potporu u obliku naknade za javne usluge (SL C 297, 29.11.2005., str. 4.).
The Autonomous Body ‘Correos y Telégrafos’ was created by the State General Budget Law 31/1990 of 27 December 1990.
Odluka Komisije 2005/842/EZ od 28. studenoga 2005. o primjeni članka 86. stavka 2.
The autonomous body ‘Correos y Telégrafos’ was set up in 1992, attached to the Ministry of Transport, Tourism and Communications.
Ugovora o EZ-u na državne potpore u obliku naknade za obavljanje javne usluge koja se dodjeljuje određenim poduzetnicima kojima je povjereno obavljanje usluga od općeg gospodarskog interesa (SL L 312, 29.11.2005., str. 67.).
Law 14/2000 of 29 December 2000, on Fiscal, Administrative and Social Measures, adopted the legal framework for the ‘Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos, S.A.’, the Company being set up in June 2001.
Vidjeti stavak 11.
On 5 June 2012 all the companies belonging to the Correos Group (i.e. Correos and its subsidiaries Correos Express, Nexea and Correos Telecom) were incorporated into the SEPI holding, which became their sole shareholder.
Okvira za usluge od općeg gospodarskog interesa iz 2012.
As compensation for delivering the USO, Correos received public funding from 1998 to 2010.
Vidjeti uvodnu izjavu 28.
Subsequently, the 2010 Postal Law entrusted Correos with the provision of the USO for a period of 15 years starting on 1 January 2011.
Odredba bi se mogla primjenjivati na mjeru koja je počela u prošlosti i još uvijek traje.
From 2000 to 2010, the USO compensation to Correos was granted on the basis of a methodology developed by the Spanish authorities (the ‘Spanish methodology’), which is detailed in the 2000 Plan de Prestación.
U takvom slučaju mogla bi se zatražiti izmjena ili čak prekid povjeravanja.
Moreover, the 2000 Plan de Prestación establishes that Correos should implement analytical accounting with separation of accounts as provided in Article 29 of the 1998 Postal Law.
Vidjeti, na primjer La Poste (Francuska), Poste Italiane (Italija) i ELTA (Grčka): svih petnaest godina.
The 1998 Postal Law was superseded by the 2010 Postal Law, which entered into force on 1 January 2011.
Direktiva Komisije 2006/111/EZ od 16. studenoga 2006. o transparentnosti financijskih odnosa između država članica i javnih poduzeća, kao i o financijskoj transparentnosti unutar određenih poduzeća (SL L 318, 17.11.2006., str. 17.).
The 2010 Postal Law entrusted Correos with the provision of the USO for a period of 15 years starting on the entry into force of the Law (i.e. until 1 January 2026).
Vidjeti stavak 31.
At this stage, according to the Spanish authorities, Correos has not formally received any USO compensation since 2011 although it has benefited from advance payments on a provisional basis for the years 2011-2017.
Okvira za usluge od općeg gospodarskog interesa iz 2012.
The actual net cost corresponding to those years remains to be calculated once the new Plan de Prestación is adopted and the NAC methodology defined.
Vidjeti stavak 44.
The IBI is a local tax in the Spanish tax system which is regulated by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2004 of 5 March 2004.
Okvira za usluge od općeg gospodarskog interesa iz 2012.
According to Article 60 of that Royal Legislative Decree, this tax ‘is an objective direct tax imposed on the value of property under the terms laid down in this Royal Legislative Decree’.
Vidjeti bilješku31.
The IAE was laid down in Law 39/1988 of 28 December 1988, substituted by Royal Legislative Decree 2/2004 of 5 March 2004.
Čak i ako bi dividende uzele u obzir u tom slučaju, Komisija je u stavku 345.
It follows from Article 78 of this Royal Legislative Decree that undertakings that carry out economic, business, professional or artistic activities should be subject to the tax.
Odluke navela da „politika dividendi ne može se izjednačiti s odredbom o povratima u skladu s kojom je moguće prilagoditi naknadu za izvršenje obveze pružanja javne usluge i spriječiti prekomjerne naknade.”
The IAE Tariffs were laid down in Royal Legislative Decree 1175/1990 of 28 of September.
Španjolska nadležna tijela najavila su da planiraju zatražiti fiskalnu prilagodbu za izračun iznosa povrata.
They classify the postal activity under Group 847 ‘Postal services and telecommunications’ from 1999 onwards.
Obavijest Komisije – Osiguravanje učinkovite provedbe odluka Komisije kojima se državama članicama nalaže povrat nezakonite i nespojive državne potpore (SL C 272, 15.11.2007., str. 4.).
The so-called Licence Quota, which was a modality of the Tax on Activities and Commercial and Industrial Benefits, was adopted by Decree 3313/1966 of 29 December 1966.
Predmet C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, EU:C:1994:100, točka 14.
Law 39/1988 of 28 December 1988 would replace the Tax on Economic and Commercial and Industrial Benefits in its modality of the Licence Quota with the IAE.
Presuda Općeg suda od 12. prosinca 1996., Air France protiv Komisije, T-358/94, ECLI:EU:T:1996:194, točka 62.
The aim of the capital injections is stated in the report of Correos' appearance before the Congress of Deputies (‘el Congreso de los Diputados’) on 4 October 2005.
Predmet C-280/00 Altmark Trans EU:C:2003:415, točka 84.
The report makes a link between the capital injections and the need of carrying out new investments in the company.
Predmet 30/59 De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg protiv Visokog tijela Europske zajednice za ugljen i čelik EU:C:1961:2, točka 19. i predmet C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline EU:C:2001:598, točka 38.
The existence of a reduced tariff for political candidates to send electoral material has been in place since 1977 where the elections of 15 June 1977 took place.
Spojeni predmeti C-78/08 to C-80/08, Paint Graphos i ostali EU:C:2011:550, točke 49 i dalje.
The elections of 15 June 1977 where organized by royal Decree 20/1997 of 18 March 1977, which established for the first time a special tariff for the distribution of electoral material.
Vidjeti predmet C-143/99 Adria-Wien Pipeline EU:C:2001:598.