natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 26 October 2016 the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) adopted the panel report, as modified by the Appellate Body report (‘the Argentina Reports’), in the European Union — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina dispute (DS473).
Opći sud zaključio je da institucije nisu uspjele dokazati, u skladu s traženim pravnim standardom, postojanje primjetnog iskrivljenja cijena glavnih sirovina koje se upotrebljavaju za proizvodnju biodizela u Argentini i Indoneziji kao rezultat sustava različitog oporezivanja izvoza na temelju kojeg su na sirovine i biodizel primijenjene različite stope poreza.
On 28 February 2018, the DSB also adopted the panel report in the European Union — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Indonesia dispute (DS480) (‘the Indonesia Report’).
Presudio je da institucije nisu trebale zauzeti stajalište da cijene sirovina nisu objektivno odražene u evidencijama argentinskih i indonezijskih proizvođača izvoznika te da nisu trebale zanemariti te evidencije pri izračunu uobičajene vrijednosti biodizela proizvedenog u Argentini i Indoneziji.
Both Indonesia and the EU did not appeal that report.
Tijelo za rješavanje sporova WTO-a donijelo je 26. listopada 2016. izvješće povjerenstva kako je izmijenjeno izvješćem Žalbenog tijela („izvješća o Argentini”) u sporu Europska unija – antidampinške mjere na biodizel iz Argentine (DS473).
In the Argentina and Indonesia Reports (‘the Reports’), it was found, inter alia, that the EU acted inconsistently with:
Tijelo za rješavanje sporova 28. veljače 2018. donijelo je i izvješće povjerenstva u sporu Europska unija – antidampinške mjere za biodizel iz Indonezije (DS480) („izvješće o Indoneziji”).
Article 2.2.1.1 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement (‘ADA’) by failing to calculate the cost of production of the product under investigation on the basis of the records kept by the producers;
Ni Indonezija ni EU nisu uložili žalbe na to izvješće.
Article 2.2 of the ADA and Article VI:1(b)(ii) of the GATT 1994 by not using the cost of production in Argentina and Indonesia when constructing the normal value of biodiesel;
U izvješćima o Argentini i Indoneziji („izvješća”) utvrđeno je, među ostalim, da je EU postupio u suprotnosti sa sljedećim:
Article 9.3 of the ADA and Article VI:2 of the GATT 1994 by imposing anti-dumping duties in excess of the margin of dumping that should have been established under Article 2 of the ADA and Article VI:1 of the GATT 1994, respectively.
člankom 2.2.1.1.
In the Indonesia Report the panel found, in addition, that the EU had acted inconsistently with:
Sporazuma WTO-a o antidampingu jer nije izračunao troškove proizvodnje proizvoda iz ispitnog postupka na temelju evidencije proizvođača,
Articles 2.2.2(iii) and 2.2 of the ADA by failing to determine the profit normally realized by other exporters or producers on sales of products of the same general category in the domestic market of the country of origin;
člankom 2.2.
Article 2.3 of the ADA by failing to construct the export price of one Indonesian exporting producer, P.T.
Sporazuma o antidampingu i člankom VI. stavkom 1. točkom (b) podtočkom ii.
Musim Mas, on the basis of the price at which the imported biodiesel produced by P.T.
Općeg sporazuma o carinama i trgovini (GATT) iz 1994. jer se pri izračunu uobičajene vrijednosti biodizela nije koristio troškovima proizvodnje u Argentini i Indoneziji,
Musim Mas was first resold to independent buyers in the EU;
člankom 9.3.
Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the ADA, by failing to establish the existence of significant price undercutting with regard to Indonesian imports.
Sporazuma o antidampingu i člankom VI. stavkom 2.
The Panel recommended that the DSB request the EU to bring its measures into conformity with the ADA and the GATT 1994.
GATT-a iz 1994. jer je uveo antidampinške pristojbe koje premašuju dampinšku maržu koja je trebala biti utvrđena u skladu s člankom 2.
Following the Argentina Reports, the Commission had initiated a review under Article 1(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/476 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the review’).
Sporazuma o antidampingu odnosno člankom VI. stavkom 1.
At the initiation of the review, the Commission announced that it considered it appropriate to examine the consequences of the findings of the Argentina Reports also for the measures imposed on biodiesel from Indonesia, as the legal interpretations contained in the Argentina Reports appeared to be also relevant for the investigation concerning Indonesia.
GATT-a iz 1994.
However, during the review, the Commission received a number of comments from interested parties concerning, in particular, the applicability of the interpretation of the Argentina Reports to the measures on biodiesel from Indonesia.
Osim toga, povjerenstvo je u izvješću o Indoneziji utvrdilo da je EU postupio u suprotnosti sa sljedećim:
The Commission considered that the analysis of the comments with regard to Indonesia required more time and decided not to include an examination of Indonesia in the amending Regulation, but instead to keep the review open as far as it concerned Indonesia.
člankom 2.2.2. točkom iii. i člankom 2.2.
On 18 September 2017, the Commission adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1578 amending the definitive Regulation (‘the amending Regulation’) in so far as Argentinian exporting producers were concerned.
Sporazuma o antidampingu jer nije odredio dobit koju obično ostvaruju drugi izvoznici ili proizvođači od prodaje proizvoda iz iste opće kategorije na domaćem tržištu zemlje podrijetla,
The annulment by the General Court of the operative parts of the definitive Regulation with regard to the exporting producers concerned also affects the validity of the amending Regulation.
člankom 2.3.
As the amending Regulation amended the Regulation of which the operative parts have been annulled, it has itself also become void and not applicable in respect of the exporting producers concerned.
Sporazuma o antidampingu jer nije izračunao izvoznu cijenu jednog indonezijskog proizvođača izvoznika, društva P.T.
On 28 May 2018 a Notice was published re-opening the original investigation concerning imports of biodiesel originating in Argentina and Indonesia that led to the adoption of the definitive Regulation (‘the Notice’).
Musim Mas, na temelju cijene po kojoj se uvezeni biodizel koji je proizvodilo društvo P.T.
At the same time the pending review with regard to Indonesia was closed.
Musim Mas isprva preprodavao neovisnim kupcima u EU-u,
According to the case-law of the Court, the procedure for replacing an annulled act may be resumed at the very point at which the illegality occurred.
člancima 3.1. i 3.2.
The Union's institutions, in so complying with the judgments, have the possibility to remedy the aspects of the definitive Regulation which led to its annulment in respect of the exporting producers concerned.
Sporazuma o antidampingu jer nije utvrdio postojanje znatnog sniženja cijene s obzirom na indonezijski uvoz.
The Commission should observe not only the operative part of the judgments but also the grounds which led to those judgments and constituted its essential basis, inasmuch as they were necessary to determine the exact meaning of what was stated in the operative part.
Povjerenstvo je preporučilo da Tijelo za rješavanje sporova zatraži od EU-a da svoje mjere uskladi sa Sporazumom o antidampingu i GATT-om iz 1994.
Other findings reached in the definitive Regulation which were not contested within the time-limits for a challenge or which were contested but rejected by the General Court's judgments, and therefore did not lead to the annulment of the definitive Regulation, remain valid.
Komisija je nakon izvješća o Argentini pokrenula pregled na temelju članka 1. stavka 3.
In order to comply with its obligations, the Commission decided to resume the present anti-dumping proceeding at the very point at which the illegality occurred and thus to re-examine the methodology used for constructing a normal value.
Uredbe (EU) 2015/476 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća („revizija”).
The Notice included in its scope the reasoning of the General Court's judgments for the exporting producers concerned and the possibility to extend the findings to all exporting producers from Argentina and Indonesia.
Na početku pregleda Komisija je najavila da smatra prikladnim ispitati posljedice nalaza izvješća o Argentini i u pogledu mjera uvedenih na uvoz biodizela iz Indonezije, s obzirom na to da se pravna tumačenja iz izvješća o Argentini čine važnima i za ispitni postupak koji se odnosi na Indoneziju.
Furthermore, it took into account the findings of the WTO panels and Appellate Body, both in respect of Argentina and Indonesia, in order to bring the measures found WTO inconsistent into full compliance with the WTO Agreements, in accordance with Article 19.1 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding.
Međutim, tijekom revizije Komisija je zaprimila određeni broj primjedbi zainteresiranih strana, posebno u pogledu primjenjivosti tumačenja izvješća o Argentini na mjere za biodizel iz Indonezije.
In the Notice the Commission invited the exporting producers concerned and the Union industry to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the Notice.
Komisija je ustvrdila da analiza primjedbi u pogledu Indonezije zahtijeva više vremena te je odlučila da ispitivanje Indonezije neće uključiti u uredbu o izmjeni, nego da će reviziju koja se odnosi na Indoneziju ostaviti otvorenom.
All parties who so requested within that time limit, and who demonstrated that there were particular reasons why they should be heard, were granted the opportunity to be heard.
Komisija je 18. rujna 2017. donijela Provedbenu uredbu (EU) 2017/1578 o izmjeni konačne uredbe („uredba o izmjeni”) u dijelu u kojem se odnosi na argentinske proizvođače izvoznike.
Representations were received from the European Biodiesel Board (EBB), five exporting producers in Indonesia and the authorities of Indonesia.
Činjenica da je Opći sud poništio izvršne dijelove konačne uredbe s obzirom na predmetne proizvođače izvoznike utječe i na valjanost uredbe o izmjeni.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE GENERAL COURT AND OF THE FINDINGS OF THE WTO
Budući da se uredbom o izmjeni mijenjala uredba čiji su izvršni dijelovi poništeni, ona je sama prestala važiti i nije primjenjiva u odnosu na predmetne proizvođače izvoznike.
The Commission has the possibility to remedy the aspects of the definitive Regulation which led to its annulment, while leaving unchanged the parts of the assessment which are not affected by the judgments.
Obavijest o ponovnom pokretanju početnog ispitnog postupka u pogledu uvoza biodizela podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije objavljena je 28. svibnja 2018. te je dovela do donošenja konačne uredbe („obavijest”).
As indicated in the Notice, in addition the Commission reassessed the definitive findings of the original investigation by taking into account the findings of the WTO panels and Appellate Body both in respect of Argentina and Indonesia.
Istodobno je završena revizija u pogledu Indonezije koja je bila u tijeku.
The Commission decided to extend the findings to all exporting producers from Argentina and Indonesia.
U skladu sa sudskom praksom Suda postupak zamjene poništenog akta može se nastaviti točno od onog trenutka u kojem je nezakonitost nastala.
That reassessment was based on information collected in the original investigation and the review, as well as on information received by interested parties after the publication of the Notice.
Institucije Unije, poštujući presude, imaju mogućnost ispraviti aspekte konačne uredbe koji su doveli do njezina poništenja u odnosu na predmetne proizvođače izvoznike.
One Indonesian exporting producer, Wilmar, has claimed, before and after disclosure, that there is no legal basis to reopen the investigation with regard to Wilmar as the General Court had annulled the definitive Regulation in its entirety for that company.
Komisija bi trebala uzeti u obzir ne samo izreke presuda već i razloge zbog kojih su one donesene i na kojima se temelje, u mjeri u kojoj je to bilo potrebno da bi se odredilo točno značenje onoga što je navedeno u izreci.
However, Article 266 TFEU provides that an institution whose act has been declared void must take the necessary measures to comply with the Court's judgment.
Ostali nalazi utvrđeni u konačnoj uredbi koji nisu osporeni u za to predviđenom roku ili koji su osporeni, ali je to odbačeno presudom Općeg suda te stoga nisu doveli do poništenja konačne uredbe, ostaju na snazi.
In addition, the EU must bring the anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of biodiesel from Indonesia into conformity with the recommendations and rulings contained in the WTO Reports.
Kako bi ispunila svoje obveze, Komisija je odlučila ponovno pokrenuti trenutačni antidampinški postupak točno od onog trenutka u kojem je nezakonitost nastala, te time preispitati metodologiju upotrijebljenu za izračun uobičajene vrijednosti.
In order to examine what measures should be taken to comply with the Court and WTO rulings, it was necessary to re-open the investigation at the time when the illegality was found for both countries and for all exporting producers concerned.
Obavijest je uključivala obrazloženje presuda Općeg suda s obzirom na predmetne proizvođače izvoznike i mogućnost da se nalazi prošire na sve proizvođače izvoznike iz Argentine i Indonezije.
Whether a measure is annulled in whole or in part is irrelevant for the purposes of determining whether the Commission must in consequence reinvestigate all the aspects of the investigation which preceded the annulled measure.
Nadalje, uzeti su u obzir nalazi povjerenstava i Žalbenog tijela WTO-a koji se odnose na Argentinu i na Indoneziju kako bi se mjere za koje je WTO utvrdio da su nesukladne u potpunosti uskladile sa sporazumima WTO-a, u skladu s člankom 19. stavkom 1.
The Commission therefore rejected this claim.
Dogovora o rješavanju sporova.
The original investigation of dumping and injury covered the period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 (‘investigation period’).
Komisija je u obavijesti pozvala predmetne proizvođače izvoznike i industriju Unije da iznesu svoja stajališta u pisanom obliku i da zatraže saslušanje u roku utvrđenom u obavijesti.
With respect to the parameters relevant in the context of the injury assessment, data covering the period from 1 January 2009 to the end of the investigation period were analysed (‘period considered’).
Svim stranama koje su to zatražile u navedenom roku i koje su dokazale da postoje posebni razlozi da ih se sasluša dana je mogućnost da budu saslušane.
PRODUCT CONCERNED
Primljena su očitovanja Europskog odbora za biodizel (EBB), pet proizvođača izvoznika u Indoneziji i indonezijskih vlasti.
The product concerned is fatty-acid mono-alkyl esters and/or paraffinic gasoils obtained from synthesis and/or hydro-treatment, of non-fossil origin, in pure form or as included in a blend originating in Argentina and Indonesia, currently falling within CN codes ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992, 38260010 and ex38260090 (‘the product concerned’, commonly referred to as ‘biodiesel’).
PROVEDBA PRESUDA OPĆEG SUDA I NALAZA WTO-a
Neither the Court's judgments nor the Reports affect the findings set out in recitals 16 to 27 of the definitive Regulation concerning the product concerned and the like product.
Komisija može ispraviti aspekte konačne uredbe koji su doveli do njezina poništenja, ostavljajući pritom nepromijenjene dijelove ocjene na koje se presude ne odnose.
DETERMINATION OF THE NORMAL VALUE AND CALCULATION OF THE DUMPING MARGINS
Kako je navedeno u obavijesti, Komisija je dodatno ponovno ocijenila konačne nalaze početnog ispitnog postupka uzimajući u obzir nalaze povjerenstava i Žalbenog tijela WTO-a koji se odnose na Argentinu i na Indoneziju.
The Commission reassessed the findings of the original investigation on the issues of cost adjustment, profit cap and double counting.
Komisija je odlučila proširiti nalaze na sve proizvođače izvoznike iz Argentine i Indonezije.
Cost adjustment
Ta se ponovna ocjena temeljila na informacijama prikupljenima u početnom ispitnom postupku i reviziji te na informacijama koje su zainteresirane strane dobile nakon objave obavijesti.
The General Court judgments and the WTO findings mentioned in recital 8 all relate to the cost-adjustment done by the EU institutions in the definitive Regulation.
Jedan indonezijski proizvođač izvoznik, društvo Wilmar, tvrdio je i prije i poslije objave da nema pravne osnove za ponovno pokretanje ispitnog postupka u odnosu na to društvo jer je Opći sud konačnu uredbu poništio u cijelosti kad je riječ o tom društvu.
As mentioned in recital 28 of the definitive Regulation, the Commission had determined that the normal value had to be constructed as the domestic sales were considered not to be in the ordinary course of trade.
Međutim, u članku 266.
This finding has not been contested and remains valid.
UFEU-a propisuje se da institucija čiji je akt proglašen ništavim mora poduzeti potrebne mjere kako bi postupila u skladu s presudom Suda.
No interested party contested this finding in the course of this review either.
Osim toga, EU mora uskladiti antidampinške mjere uvedene na uvoz biodizela iz Indonezije s preporukama i odlukama koje se nalaze u izvješćima WTO-a.
In recitals 29 to 34 of the definitive Regulation, the Commission established that the difference in the export taxes imposed by Indonesia on the main raw material input (crude palm oil in Indonesia and soybean oil and soya beans in Argentina) and those imposed on the finished product (biodiesel) depressed domestic prices in Indonesia and Argentina, and hence this should be taken into account in the construction of the normal value.
Kako bi se ispitalo koje bi mjere trebalo poduzeti radi usklađivanja s presudama Suda i WTO-a, bilo je nužno ponovno pokrenuti ispitni postupak od trenutka u kojem je nezakonitost pronađena s obzirom na obje zemlje i na sve predmetne proizvođače izvoznike.
As a result, when constructing the normal value, the Commission replaced the costs of the main raw material reported in the records of the exporting producers with reference prices published by the relevant authorities of the countries concerned.
Činjenica poništava li se mjera u cijelosti ili dijelom nije važna kako bi se odredilo mora li Komisija zbog toga ponovno ispitati sve aspekte ispitnog postupka koji je prethodio mjeri koja se poništava.
The Commission further based its conclusions in the original investigation on the interpretation that Article 2.2.1.1 of the ADA allows the investigating authority to decline to use the records of the exporting producers if it determines that they are either (i) inconsistent with GAAP or (ii) do not reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of the product under consideration (recitals 42 and 72 of the definitive Regulation).
Komisija je stoga odbacila tu tvrdnju.
The Panel and Appellate Body, in the Reports for both Argentina and Indonesia, are of the opinion that the Commission did not provide a legally sufficient basis under Article 2.2.1.1 for concluding that the Indonesian and Argentinian producers' records did not reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of biodiesel, or for disregarding the relevant costs in those records when constructing the normal value of biodiesel.
Početnim ispitnim postupkom o dampingu i šteti bilo je obuhvaćeno razdoblje od 1. srpnja 2011. do 30. lipnja 2012. („razdoblje ispitnog postupka”).
Following the Argentina Reports, the Commission had recalculated the normal value for exporting producers in Argentina using the methodology explained in recitals 40 to 49 for Argentina of the provisional Regulation.
Kad je riječ o parametrima relevantnima za procjenu štete, analizirani su podaci koji obuhvaćaju razdoblje od 1. siječnja 2009. do kraja razdoblja ispitnog postupka („razmatrano razdoblje”).
As explained above in recital 11 and 12, the Commission had initially also recalculated the normal value for exporting producers in Indonesia, using the methodology explained in recitals 60 to 65 for Indonesia of the provisional RegulationOJ L 141, 28.5.2013, p. 6.
PREDMETNI PROIZVOD
The Commission now re-applied this methodology for both countries.
Predmetni su proizvod monoalkilni esteri masnih kiselina i/ili parafinska plinska ulja dobivena sintezom i/ili hidrotretiranjem, nefosilnog podrijetla, u čistom obliku ili u mješavini, podrijetlom iz Argentine i Indonezije, trenutačno razvrstani u oznake KN ex15162098, ex15180091, ex15180095, ex15180099, ex27101943, ex27101946, ex27101947, 27102011, 27102015, 27102017, ex38249992, 38260010 i ex38260090 („predmetni proizvod”, koji se obično naziva „biodizel”).
In its submissions made after the re-opening of this case, EBB claimed that the Reports do not preclude recourse to a cost adjustment to the raw material costs when constructing the normal value, provided it is properly explained.
Ni presude Suda ni izvješća ne utječu na nalaze utvrđene u uvodnim izjavama od 16. do 27. konačne uredbe koje se odnose na predmetni proizvod i istovjetni proizvod.
The same claim was made during the Review following the Argentina Reports, and rejected by the Commission as accepting it would not be in line with the findings of the Reports, as explained in recitals 43 to 53 of the amending Regulation.
UTVRĐIVANJE UOBIČAJENE VRIJEDNOSTI I IZRAČUN DAMPINŠKIH MARŽI
As that explanation remains valid after the Indonesia Report, the Commission continued to reject this claim.
Komisija je ponovno ocijenila nalaze početnog ispitnog postupka s obzirom na pitanja prilagodbe troškova, gornje granice dobiti i dvostrukog brojanja.
For reasons explained in recitals 44 and 64 of the provisional Regulation, the domestic sales in either country were not considered as being made in the ordinary course of trade and the normal value of the like product had to be constructed under Article 2(3) and (6) of the basic Regulation.
Prilagodba troškova
This was done by adding to the adjusted production costs during the investigation period, the selling, general and administrative expenses incurred (‘SG&A’) and a reasonable profit margin.
Presude Općeg suda i nalazi WTO-a navedeni u uvodnoj izjavi 8. povezani su s prilagodbom troškova koju su provele institucije EU-a u konačnoj uredbi.
As explained in recitals 46 and 65 of the provisional Regulation, the Commission considered that the amount for profit could not be based on the actual data of the sampled companies in Indonesia.
Kako je navedeno u uvodnoj izjavi 28. konačne uredbe, Komisija je utvrdila da je bilo potrebno izračunati uobičajenu vrijednost jer se smatralo da domaća prodaja nije u skladu s uobičajenim tijekom trgovine.
Therefore, the amount for profit used when constructing the normal value was determined under Article 2(6)(c) of the basic Regulation on the basis of the reasonable amount of profit that a young and innovative capital intensive industry of this type under normal conditions of competition in a free and open market could achieve, that is 15 % based on turnover.
Taj nalaz nije osporen i stoga ostaje na snazi.
In the Argentina and Indonesia WTO cases, the determination of an amount of profit of 15 % was challenged by both countries who claimed that the amount for profit was not based on a ‘reasonable method’ as required by Article 2.2.2(iii) ADA.
Nijedna zainteresirana strana nije osporila taj nalaz ni tijekom ove revizije.
The WTO adjudicating bodies found in both cases that the EU had not acted inconsistently with the ADA in this respect.
U uvodnim izjavama od 29. do 34. konačne uredbe Komisija je utvrdila da su zbog razlika između izvoznih poreza koje je Indonezija uvela na glavne sirovine (sirovo palmino ulje u Indoneziji te sojino ulje i soja u zrnu u Argentini) i onih uvedenih na gotovi proizvod (biodizel) snižene domaće cijene u Indoneziji i Argentini, zbog čega bi to trebalo uzeti u obzir pri izračunu uobičajene vrijednosti.