natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Germany has explained that this minimum contribution aims at guaranteeing that also atypical network users pay a minimum contribution to the management of the public grid to which they are connected.
Funkcija istodobnosti tada se pretvara u naknadu po kapacitetu priključka u EUR/kW i naknadu po jedinici potrošene električne energije u EUR/kWh.
Concerning baseload consumers in particular, Germany has indicated that if they are located very close to a baseload power plant, the network charges calculated based on the physical path methodology could be close to zero.
Pri utvrđivanju naknada za upotrebu mreže mrežni operateri moraju uzeti u obzir i maksimalnu razinu prihoda koju je svakome od njih odobrila Savezna agencija za mreže (Bundesnetzagentur, „BNetzA”) (za više o maksimalnoj dopuštenoj razini prihoda vidjeti i uvodnu izjavu 43.).
Those baseload consumers, however, still benefit from the public network and the secured electricity supply that it provides.
U praksi ta maksimalna razina prihoda, koja se utvrđuje usporedbom s drugim mrežnim operaterima, znači da se visoki troškovi uzrokovani neučinkovitosti neće moći nadoknaditi naknadama za upotrebu mreže.
Germany has moreover explained that the minimum contribution was taking account of the fact that the physical path methodology can only serve as a proxy to determine the individual network costs.
Cilj tog sustava jest poboljšanje učinkovitosti mrežnih operatera.
THE FULL EXEMPTION BETWEEN 2011 AND 2013
Ako bi izmjena odobrene maksimalne razine prihoda dovela do smanjenja naknade za upotrebu mreže, mrežni operater mora prilagoditi naknade za upotrebu mreže (članak 17. stavak 2.
In the StromNEV as amended by Article 7 of the Law of 26 July 2011, which entered into force on 4 August 2011 but was retroactively applicable as of 1 January 2011 (‘StromNEV 2011’), the system of individual network charges for baseload consumers was abolished and replaced by a full exemption from the obligation to pay network charges.
Pravilnika o uvođenju poticaja za učinkovitost mreže za opskrbu energijom – Verordnung über die Anreizregulierung der Energieversorgungsnetze, ARegV iz 2011.).
Individual network charges for non-peak consumers remained in place as well as their obligation to pay at least 20 % of the published network charge.
Primjenom metodologije prethodno opisane u uvodnim izjavama od 11. do 15. u utvrđivanju naknada za upotrebu mreže za većinu korisnika mreže provodi se „načelo stvarnog troška”.
According to the second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 end users were to be exempted from network charges if their annual energy consumption reaches at least 7000 hours of full use and exceeds 10 GWh of consumption.
Člankom 19. stavkom 2.
That exemption (‘the full exemption’) constitutes the subject-matter of both the Opening Decision and this Decision.
StromNEV-a utvrđene su dvije skupine netipičnih korisnika mreže.
The threshold of 7000 hours of full use is what characterizes a baseload consumer in the sense that this threshold can only be reached if the end user concerned remains almost constantly connected to the network with the same load.
Prvu čine korisnici čije je godišnje vršno opterećenje predvidljivo i znatno odstupa od istodobnog godišnjeg vršnog opterećenja svih drugih korisnika mreže priključenih na istu mrežu (prva rečenica članka 19. stavka 2.
Hours of (full) use are defined under Paragraph 2(2) of the StromNEV as the quotient of the annual power output and the annual peak load of the respective network user.
StromNEV-a).
Pursuant to the third sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011, the exemption provided for in the second sentence of the same paragraph was to be granted only once the competent regulatory authority (either the BNetzA or one of the regional regulators, ‘Landesregulierungsbehörde’) had verified that the legal conditions were fulfilled.
To se obično odnosi na korisnike mreže koji sustavno troše energiju izvan razdoblja vršnog opterećenja jer na primjer opremu upotrebljavaju noću.
Once that verification was completed, the BNetzA or the Landesregulierungsbehörde delivered an authorisation that entitled the baseload consumer to the full exemption as of 1 January 2011 (provided all conditions were met at that date) and for an indefinite period (provided that the requirements continued to be met).
Ta se prva kategorija netipičnih korisnika mreže u daljnjem tekstu naziva „izvanvršni potrošači”.
The full exemption resulted in a reduction of revenues for network operators.
Drugu čine korisnici s godišnjom potrošnjom električne energije koja doseže minimalnih 7000 sati upotrebe i premašuje 10 gigavatsati (GWh) (druga rečenica članka 19. stavka 2.
This financial loss has been compensated through a special surcharge as of 2012 (see section 2.4 below).
StromNEV-a).
The full exemption was abolished by an amendment to the StromNEV as of 1 January 2014.
Prije izmjene uvedene člankom 7.
BENEFICIARIES AND AID AMOUNT
Zakona od 26. srpnja 2011., koja je detaljnije opisana u odjeljku 2.2. u nastavku, u članku 19. stavku 2.
Germany has provided a provisional list of undertakings entitled to an exemption under the second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011.
StromNEV-a, kako je izmijenjen Zakonom od 3. rujna 2010. („StromNEV iz 2010.”), bilo je utvrđeno da izvanvršni potrošači i potrošači baznog opterećenja moraju plaćati pojedinačne naknade za upotrebu mreže kako je izričito predviđeno u ovlasti iz točke 3. prve rečenice članka 24.
Based on this information, more than 200 undertakings were exempted from network charges under the second sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 in the period 2011 to 2013.
EnWG-a iz 2011. (vidjeti prethodnu uvodnu izjavu 7.).
Only occasionally have undertakings involved in the service sector (for instance web hosting) obtained a full exemption.
Konkretno, u trećoj rečenici članka 19. stavka 2.
Those undertakings were undertakings with large data centres.
StromNEV-a iz 2010. navodi se da bi pojedinačna naknada za upotrebu mreže trebala odražavati doprinos netipičnog korisnika mreže smanjenju sveukupnih naknada za upotrebu mreže ili njegov doprinos izbjegavanju njihova povećanja.
The estimates provided by Germany indicate that the losses incurred by the network operators due to the full exemption over the period 2011 to 2013 amount to approximately EUR 900 million compared to a situation in which baseload consumers would have paid the normal charge.
U tu svrhu agencija BNetzA je 2010. objavila smjernice u kojima se daje pregled takozvane „metodologije fizičke putanje”, koja bi se trebala primjenjivati za utvrđivanje troškova mreže koje su uzrokovali potrošači baznog opterećenja, a time i njihovih pojedinačnih naknada za upotrebu mreže.
The loss is, however, probably lower as in the calculation of the 2011 network charges network operators normally took into account the fact that the baseload consumers would have been eligible for individual network charges under Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2010.
Cilj metodologije fizičke putanje jest utvrđivanje pojedinačnih troškova određenog korisnika mreže.
FINANCING MECHANISM
No u drugoj rečenici članka 19. stavka 2.
THE FINANCING MECHANISM AS DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPH 19 OF THE STROMNEV 2011
StromNEV-a iz 2010. bilo je utvrđeno da izvanvršni potrošači i potrošači baznog opterećenja moraju plaćati minimalni doprinos od najmanje 20 % objavljene naknade za upotrebu mreže, odnosno da pojedinačna naknada za upotrebu mreže izračunana na temelju doprinosa netipičnog korisnika mreže smanjenju sveukupnih naknada za upotrebu mreže ili njegova doprinosa sprječavanju njihova povećanja nije smjela biti niža od 20 % objavljenih naknada za upotrebu mreže.
Given that the exempted baseload consumers were connected to different network levels, the full exemption led to losses in revenue both for the transmission system operators (‘TSO’) and the distribution system operators (‘DSO’).
Njemačka je objasnila da se tim minimalnim doprinosom osiguravalo da i netipični korisnici mreže plaćaju minimalni doprinos za upravljanje javnom mrežom na koju su priključeni.
The sixth sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 obliged the TSO to compensate the DSO for their losses in revenue resulting from the full exemption.
Posebno kad je riječ o potrošačima baznog opterećenja, Njemačka je istaknula da su za one koji se nalaze vrlo blizu elektrani baznog opterećenja naknade za upotrebu mrežu izračunane metodologijom fizičke putanje mogle biti blizu nuli.
However, for the reasons set out in detail under section 2.4.3, such compensation de facto only took place as of 2012.
No ti potrošači baznog opterećenja i dalje ostvaruju koristi od javne mreže i zajamčene opskrbe električnom energijom koja se njome isporučuje.
In 2011, the losses were born by the TSO and DSO to whose network the exempted baseload consumers were connected.
Njemačka je nadalje objasnila da se minimalnim doprinosom uzima u obzir činjenica da metodologija fizičke putanje može poslužiti samo kao zamjena za utvrđivanje pojedinačnih troškova mreže.
Furthermore, pursuant to the seventh sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011, the TSO had to set off the sum of their payments to the DSO and their own losses amongst themselves.
POTPUNO IZUZEĆE OD 2011.
For the detailed rules on how to carry out that set-off, Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 referred to Paragraph 9 of the Combined Heat and Power Generation Act (Kraft-Wärme-Kopplungsgesetz, ‘KWKG’) applicable at the time, which was to be applied by analogy.
DO 2013.
The set-off served to spread the financial burden between the TSO in such a way that each TSO bore the same burden in proportion to the electricity supplied to final consumers (directly or indirectly) connected to their respective network area.
U skladu sa StromNEV-om kako je izmijenjen člankom 7.
Paragraph 9 of the KWKG, to which the seventh sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 referred, established the system by which TSOs were compensated through the so-called CHP-surcharge for the extra costs resulting from their obligation to pay support to producers of cogenerated electricity connected to their network under the KWKG and their obligation to compensate DSOs for the support that they also paid to producers of cogenerated electricity connected to their network under the KWKG.
Zakona od 26. srpnja 2011., koji je stupio na snagu 4. kolovoza 2011., no retroaktivno se primjenjuje od 1. siječnja 2011. („StromNEV iz 2011.”) sustav pojedinačnih naknada za upotrebu mreže za potrošače baznog opterećenja ukinut je i zamijenjen potpunim izuzećem od obveze plaćanja naknada za upotrebu mreže.
The analogous application of Paragraph 9 of the KWKG implied that network operators could introduce a surcharge to obtain compensation for the financial losses resulting from the full exemption and that the revenues collected from this surcharge had to be transferred from DSOs to the TSOs.
Pojedinačne naknade za upotrebu mreže za izvanvršne potrošače i njihova obveza plaćanja najmanje 20 % objavljene naknade za upotrebu mreže ostale su na snazi.
In addition, Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 stipulated that Paragraph 20 of the StromNEV 2011 was applicable by analogy.
U drugoj rečenici članka 19. stavka 2.
Paragraph 20 of the StromNEV 2011 stated that electricity grid operators had to make sure, prior to publishing their network charges for electricity, that the revenues of the charges were sufficient to cover their expected costs.
StromNEV-a iz 2011. utvrđeno je da su krajnji korisnici izuzeti od plaćanja naknada za upotrebu mreže ako njihova godišnja potrošnja električne energije doseže najmanje 7000 sati maksimalne upotrebe i premašuje 10 GWh potrošnje.
Since the entry into force of the ARegV, which establishes a regulatory system that is aimed at incentivising network operators to a more efficient network management, network charges do not need to be approved by the BNetzA anymore (as a result of Paragraph 23a of the EnWG).
To izuzeće („potpuno izuzeće”) predmet je odluke o pokretanju postupka i ove odluke.
According to Paragraph 17 ARegV 2011 this authorized maximum revenue level must be respected when network operators determine network charges.
Sati (maksimalne) upotrebe definirani su u članku 2. stavku 2.
Network operators continue, however, to be obliged to make sure prior to publishing their network charges for electricity, that the revenues of the charges were sufficient to cover their expected costs (but within the limit of the authorized maximum revenue level).
StromNEV-a kao količnik godišnje izlazne snage i godišnjeg vršnog opterećenja predmetnog korisnika mreže.
As explained below, the BNetzA adopted a regulatory decision in order to regulate more in detail the surcharge system, which was eventually put in place as of 2012 (see section 2.4.2).
U skladu s trećom rečenicom članka 19. stavka 2.
By contrast, in 2011, the sixth and seventh sentences of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 were not implemented and each network operator bore its own costs (see section 2.4.3).
StromNEV-a iz 2011. izuzeće iz druge rečenice tog članka dodjeljuje se tek nakon što nadležno regulatorno tijelo (agencija BNetzA ili neko od regionalnih regulatornih tijela, „Landesregulierungsbehörde”) provjeri jesu li ispunjeni svi pravni zahtjevi.
FINANCING VIA THE ‘PARAGRAPH 19-SURCHARGE’ AS OF 2012
Nakon provjere agencija BNetzA ili Landesregulierungsbehörde izdali bi odobrenje kojim je potrošaču baznog opterećenja odobreno potpuno izuzeće od 1. siječnja 2011. (pod uvjetom da su svi zahtjevi ispunjeni na taj datum) na neodređeno razdoblje (pod uvjetom da se zahtjevi i dalje nastave ispunjavati).
The legal framework for the compensation and the set-off of the losses in revenue resulting from the full exemption was concretized by a regulatory decision of the BNetzA adopted on 14 December 2011 (‘the regulatory decision of 14 December 2011’) on the basis of Paragraph 29(1) of the EnWG and point 6 of Paragraph 30(2) of the StromNEV 2011.
Potpuno izuzeće dovelo je do smanjenja prihoda mrežnih operatera.
The decision imposed on the DSO the obligation to collect from end users a surcharge called the ‘Paragraph 19-surcharge’.
Taj financijski gubitak od 2012. nadoknađuje se posebnom dodatnom pristojbom (vidjeti odjeljak 2.4. u nastavku).
The BNetzA further imposed on the DSO the obligation to transfer the proceeds from this surcharge to the TSO on a monthly basis (as also provided for under Paragraph 9(5) of the KWKG to which the seventh sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 refers).
No za 2011. nije uvedena nikakva posebna dodatna pristojba i te su godine financijski gubitak snosili mrežni operateri.
The purpose of the Paragraph 19-surcharge was to establish a financing mechanism that distributes the financial burden resulting from the application of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011 in a transparent and homogenous way and thus to create equal conditions for all electricity consumers across Germany.
Potpuno izuzeće ukinuto je izmjenom StromNEV-a od 1. siječnja 2014.
The amount of the Paragraph 19-surcharge was not calculated by the BNetzA but needed to be calculated each year by the TSO on the basis of the methodology set out by the BNetzA.
KORISNICI I IZNOS POTPORE
This implied that the TSO had to determine on the one hand the forecasted financial losses resulting from the full exemption compared to the full network charge and on the other hand the forecasted consumption in order to determine the Paragraph 19-surcharge per kWh.
Velika većina tih poduzetnika pripada različitim granama proizvodnog sektora, posebno u području kemijske industrije (uključujući industrijske plinove), papira, tekstila, čelika, obojenih metala, rafinerija nafte i proizvodnje stakla.
For the first year of operation (that is to say 2012), however, the BNetzA set the amount that needed to be recovered through the Paragraph 19-surcharge at EUR 440 million.
Poduzetnici iz uslužnog sektora (primjerice, internetsko udomljavanje, tj. hosting) dobili su potpuno izuzeće samo u nekim slučajevima.
This amount served as a basis for the calculation of the surcharge.
Riječ je o poduzetnicima s velikim podatkovnim centrima.
Of this amount, EUR 300 million needed to be recovered in order to compensate for the losses in revenue resulting from the full exemption.
Procjene koje je dostavila Njemačka ukazuju na to da gubitci mrežnih operatera nastali zbog potpunog izuzeća od 2011. do 2013. iznose približno 900 milijuna EUR u usporedbi sa situacijom u kojoj bi potrošači baznog opterećenja plaćali uobičajenu naknadu.
The remaining EUR 140 million were destined to cover the losses in revenue resulting from individual network charges based on the first sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011.
MEHANIZAM FINANCIRANJA
Before the amendments introduced by Article 7 of the Law of 26 July 2011 in the StromNEV, the loss of revenues resulting from individual network charges for atypical network users were recouped, to the extent that the network operator was an efficient company and hence could under the ARegV recoup its entire costs, through network charges: as network operators knew in advance that some users would pay less, they could already factor that in in the calculation of network charges under Paragraph 20 of the StromNEV.
MEHANIZAM FINANCIRANJA KAKO JE OPISAN U ČLANKU 19.
Under the sixth and seventh sentence of Paragraph 19(2) of the StromNEV 2011, however, the loss of revenues resulting from individual network charges for non-peak consumers and the full exemption for baseload consumers had to be compensated through a dedicated surcharge.
STROMNEV-A IZ 2011.
In addition, the regulatory decision of 14 December 2011 provided that the TSO had to establish for each year what the real need in terms of financial resources was for the previous year.
Budući da su izuzeti potrošači baznog opterećenja bili priključeni na različite razine mreže, potpuno izuzeće dovelo je do gubitaka prihoda operatera prijenosnih sustava („OPS-i”) i operatera distribucijskih sustava („ODS-i”).
Where the proceeds from the Paragraph 19-surcharge exceeded the amount actually needed to compensate the TSO for the losses in revenue resulting from the full exemption and the compensation of DSO, the surcharge in the subsequent year would have to be reduced by the difference.
U šestoj rečenici članka 19. stavka 2.
Where the proceeds were insufficient, the surcharge was increased accordingly.
StromNEV-a iz 2011. utvrđena je obveza OPS-â da ODS-ima nadoknadi gubitke prihoda nastale zbog potpunog izuzeća.
FINANCING MECHANISM FOR 2011
Nadalje, OPS-i su u skladu sa sedmom rečenicom članka 19. stavka 2.
The regulatory decision of 14 December 2011 explicitly stated that the losses in revenue incurred in 2011 were not covered by the compensation and set-off mechanism described in recital 30.
StromNEV-a iz 2011. trebali međusobno prebiti ukupna plaćanja ODS-ima i vlastite gubitke.
As regards the losses incurred in 2011, the DSO were thus not entitled to be compensated by the TSO.
Kad je riječ o detaljnim pravilima o tom prijeboju, u članku 19. stavku 2.
Both the DSO and the TSO had to cover those losses in revenue from their own resources.
StromNEV-a iz 2011. upućuje se na članak 9. tada važećeg Zakona o kogeneraciji toplinske i električne energije (Kraft-Wärme-Kopplungsgesetz, „KWKG”), koji se morao primijeniti mutatis mutandis.
As mentioned in recital 32, the ARegV established a regulatory system that is aimed at incentivising network operators to a more efficient network management and under which network operators are subject to a maximum revenue level established by the BNetzA.
Člankom 9.
This authorized maximum revenue level is established for a regulatory period of 5 years the maximum.
KWKG-a, na koji se upućuje u sedmoj rečenici članka 19. stavka 2.
In order to establish this maximum revenue level, network operators are obliged to provide the BNetzA with various accounting data (including costs and revenues) prior to the start of a regulatory period.
StromNEV-a iz 2011., uspostavljen je sustav u okviru kojega se OPS-ima isplaćivala takozvana dodatna pristojba za kogeneraciju kao naknada dodatnih troškova proizašlih iz njihovih obveza iz KWKG-a prema kojima su trebali plaćati naknadu proizvođačima kombinirano proizvedene električne energije priključenima na njihovu mrežu i nadoknaditi ODS-ima troškove naknade proizvođačima kombinirano proizvedene električne energije priključenima na njihovu mrežu.
In addition, the maximum revenue level that network operators are allowed to obtain from network users is evolving during the 5 year regulatory period to take into account inefficiencies of network operators in order to induce them to increase efficiency.
Primjena mutatis mutandis članka 9.
This implies that the approved maximum revenue will decrease during the regulatory period.
KWKG-a značila je da su mrežni operateri mogli uvesti dodatnu pristojbu kako bi nadoknadili financijske gubitke nastale zbog potpunog izuzeća te da su ODS-i prihode ostvarene naplatom te dodatne naknade morali prenijeti OPS-ima.
The efficiency of a network operator is measured prior to the regulatory period based on a comparison of the network operators by the BNetzA.
Osim toga, u članku 19. stavku 2.
The first regulatory period was from 2009 to 2013.
StromNEV-a iz 2011. utvrđeno je da se članak 20.
The positive or negative differences between the approved maximum revenue level and the actually obtained revenues are booked on a special regulatory account, which is an accounting tool administered by the BNetzA (Paragraph 5 of the ARegV) in order to steer network operators towards more efficiency.
U članku 20.
The resulting positive balance or negative balance was transferred to the next regulatory period (Paragraph 5(4) of the ARegV 2011) and spread over the five years of the second regulatory period as a decrease or increase of the otherwise applicable maximum revenue level.
Od stupanja na snagu ARegV-a, kojim se uspostavlja regulatorni sustav čiji je cilj poticanje mrežnih operatera na učinkovitije upravljanje mrežom, agencija BNetzA više ne mora odobriti naknade za upotrebu mreže (na temelju članka 23.a EnWG-a).
However, if the revenues obtained in a given year of the regulatory period were to exceed by more than 5 % the approved maximum revenue level, the network operator concerned would have to adapt its network charges (to avoid that the same situations occurs again in the following year and to avoid that the reduction of network charges would be postponed until the next regulatory period).
Umjesto toga, na temelju članka 32. stavka 1. točke 1.
If the revenues obtained in a given year of the regulatory period were to be below the approved maximum revenue level by more than 5 %, the network operator concerned would have the right to adapt its network charges (to avoid that the same situations occurs again in the following year and avoid a sudden increase of network charges in the next regulatory period).
ARegV-a iz 2011. agencija BNetzA odobrava maksimalnu razinu prihoda koje mrežni operateri mogu ostvariti od korisnikâ mreže.
The network operator has, however, in the latter case the choice to adapt the network charges or not..
Prema članku 17.
It is in this framework that the losses in revenue incurred by the network operators due to the full exemption in 2011 had to be compensated.
ARegV-a iz 2011. mrežni operateri moraju se pridržavati te odobrene maksimalne razine prihoda kada utvrđuju naknade za upotrebu mreže.
At the time of the ‘Verprobung’ for 2011 (and which took place in 2010), the full exemption was not known and could not have been taken into account when network charges were established for 2011.
No mrežni operateri i dalje imaju obvezu osigurati da su njihovi prihodi od naknada dostatni za pokrivanje očekivanih troškova (no unutar granica odobrene maksimalne razine prihoda) prije nego što objave svoje naknade za upotrebu električne mreže.